Oakley City Council
July 11, 2023

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
328
Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
44 / 61
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
329
Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
45 / 61
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 330
Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
46 / 61
Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Linear, Grading &
Excavation
Linear, Grading &
Excavation
3/25/2023 4/7/2023 5.00 10.0 —
Linear, Drainage, Utilities, &
Sub-Grade
Linear, Drainage, Utilities, &
Sub-Grade
4/8/2023 4/21/2023 5.00 10.0 —
Linear, Paving Linear, Paving 4/22/2023 5/5/2023 5.00 10.0 — Demolition Demolition 1/1/2023 2/12/2023 5.00 30.0 —
Site Preparation Site Preparation 2/13/2023 3/24/2023 5.00 30.0 — Grading Grading 3/25/2023 5/5/2023 5.00 30.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 5/27/2023 9/12/2025 5.00 600 — Paving Paving 5/6/2023 5/26/2023 5.00 15.0 —
331
Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
47 / 61
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/10/2023 9/26/2025 5.00 600 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Demolition Excavators Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 332 Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
48 / 61
Linear, Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42 Linear, Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Linear, Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Linear, Grading &
Excavation
Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Linear, Grading &
Excavation
Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Linear, Drainage,
Utilities, & Sub-Grade
Trenchers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 40.0 0.50

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 15.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 3.07 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 20.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
333
Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
49 / 61
Grading Onsite truck—— HHDT
Building Construction————
Building Construction Worker 27.7 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 8.23 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck—— HHDT
Paving————
Paving Worker 15.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor— 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck—— HHDT
Architectural Coating————
Architectural Coating Worker 5.54 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor— 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck—— HHDT
Linear, Grading & Excavation————
Linear, Grading & Excavation Worker 10.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Linear, Grading & Excavation Vendor 0.00 8.40 HHDT,MHDT Linear, Grading & Excavation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Linear, Grading & Excavation Onsite truck—— HHDT
Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade————
Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade Worker 5.00 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade Vendor 0.00 8.40 HHDT,MHDT Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade Onsite truck—— HHDT Linear, Paving————
334
Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
50 / 61
Linear, Paving Worker 12.5 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Linear, Paving Vendor 0.00 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Linear, Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Linear, Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 304,054 101,351 0.00 0.00 —

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (Building Square Footage)
Acres Paved (acres)
Linear, Grading & Excavation — — 0.20 0.00 —
Linear, Drainage, Utilities, &
Sub-Grade
— — 0.20 0.00 —
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,000 —
Site Preparation — — 45.0 0.00 —
Grading — — 90.0 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
335
Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
51 / 61
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Single Family Housing 0.85 0%
User Defined Linear 0.20 100%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2023 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2024 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2025 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Single Family
Housing
727 726 726 265,197 7,964 7,957 7,957 2,906,073

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Single Family Housing —
336
Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
52 / 61
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 15
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 62
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
304053.75 101,351 0.00 0.00 —

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Single Family Housing 476,234 204 0.0330 0.0040 3,559,088 337
Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
53 / 61

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Single Family Housing 2,802,209 13,156,231

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Single Family Housing 18.4 0.00

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Single Family Housing Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Single Family Housing Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor 338
Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
54 / 61

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration
339
Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
55 / 61

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 19.4 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 1.95 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.

Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation 1 0 0 N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
340
Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
56 / 61
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation 1 1 1 2
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details
341
Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
57 / 61

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 37.6
AQ-PM 24.9
AQ-DPM 42.8
Drinking Water 43.3
Lead Risk Housing 37.4
Pesticides 62.3
Toxic Releases 24.8
Traffic 9.01
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 80.9
Groundwater 39.4
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 0.00
Impaired Water Bodies 96.3
Solid Waste 22.1
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 78.9
Cardio-vascular 79.5
Low Birth Weights 40.9
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 46.8
Housing 25.3
Linguistic 9.46
Poverty 44.2
342
Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
58 / 61
Unemployment 26.9

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 53.47106378
Employed 45.74618247
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 38.0341332
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 78.60900808
Transportation —
Auto Access 40.33106634
Active commuting 17.10509432
Social —
2-parent households 12.13909919
Voting 48.44090851
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 80.59797254
Park access 50.03208007
Retail density 10.07314256
Supermarket access 2.399589375
Tree canopy 47.18336969
Housing —
Homeownership 62.29949955
Housing habitability 86.79584242
343
Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
59 / 61
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 48.45374054 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 95.30347748
Uncrowded housing 52.3675093
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 44.9121006
Arthritis 0.0
Asthma ER Admissions 12.2
High Blood Pressure 0.0
Cancer (excluding skin) 0.0
Asthma 0.0
Coronary Heart Disease 0.0
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 0.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 0.0
Life Expectancy at Birth 20.9
Cognitively Disabled 46.5
Physically Disabled 57.4
Heart Attack ER Admissions 10.4
Mental Health Not Good 0.0
Chronic Kidney Disease 0.0
Obesity 0.0
Pedestrian Injuries 19.6
Physical Health Not Good 0.0
Stroke 0.0
Health Risk Behaviors—
Binge Drinking 0.0
Current Smoker 0.0
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 0.0
344
Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
60 / 61
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 25.4
Elderly 75.4
English Speaking 70.3
Foreign-born 43.5
Outdoor Workers 12.9
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 74.3
Traffic Density 9.9
Traffic Access 56.2
Other Indices —
Hardship 54.9
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 35.7

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 47.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 55.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state. 345
Sellers Avenue Detailed Report, 9/8/2022
61 / 61

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health and Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Per CGS map, project site is composed of marine and continental sedimentary rock.

Construction: Construction Phases Linear construction assumed to occur entirely during grading phase.

Construction: Off-Road Equipment Construction equipment assumed to be generally consistent with the normal construction defaults.

Operations: Vehicle Data Trip generation updated based on project-specific traffic report. 346
Appendix B
Planning Survey Report
347

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
Application Form and Planning Survey Report
To Comply With and Receive Permit Coverage Under
The East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan
and Natural Community Conservation Plan
Please complete this application to apply for take authorization under the state and federal East Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP incidental take permits. The East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy (“Conservancy”) or local jurisdiction (City of Brentwood, City of Clayton, City of Oakley, City of Pittsburg, and Contra Costa County) may request more information in order to deem the application complete.

I. PROJECT OVERVIEW

PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT NAME: DeJesus Property
PROJECT TYPE: Residential Commercial Transportation Utility Other PROJECT DESCRIPTION (BRIEF): Construction of a 77-lot residential subdivision. A detailed project description is included in Attachment A.

PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: West side of Sellers Road in Oakley, Contra Costa County, California.

PARCEL/PROJECT SIZE (ACRES): 20.75+/- acres (20.42+/- acre parcel + 0.33+/- acres off-site improvements to Sellers Avenue) PROJECT APN(S): 033-150-013
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE: May 2022 FINAL PSR DATE: (City/County/Conservancy use) LEAD PLANNER: Joshua McMurray
JURISDICTION: City of Brentwood City of Clayton City of Oakley City of Pittsburg Contra Costa County Participating Special Entity*

DEVELOPMENT FEE ZONE: Zone I Zone II Zone III Zone IV
See figure 9-1 of the HCP/NCCP at www.cocohcp.org for a generalized development fee zone map. Detailed development fee zone maps by jurisdiction are available from the jurisdiction.

PROJECT APPLICANT INFORMATION
APPLICANT’S NAME: MLC Holdings, Inc.

AUTHORIZED AGENT’S NAME AND TITLE: Paul Manyisha, Forward Planning Manager PHONE NO.: (925) 324-6178 APPLICANT’S E-MAIL: [email protected] MAILING ADDRESS: 2603 Camino Ramon, Suite 140, San Ramon, CA 94583 BIOLOGIST INFORMATION1
BIOLOGICAL/ENVIRONMENTAL FIRM: Moore Biological Consultants CONTACT NAME AND TITLE: Diane S. Moore, M.S.

PHONE NO.: (209) 745-1159 CONTACT’S E-MAIL: [email protected] MAILING ADDRESS: Moore Biological Consultants, 10330 Twin Cities Rd., Ste. 30, Galt, California 95632 1 A USFWS/CDFW-approved biologist (project-specific) is required to conduct the surveys. Please submit biologist(s) approval request to the Conservancy. *Participating Special Entities are organizations not subject to the authority of a local jurisdiction. Such organizations may include school districts, irrigation districts, transportation agencies, local park districts, geological hazard abatement districts, or other utilities or special districts that own land or provide public services.
348

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
II. PROJECT DETAILS
Please complete and/or provide the following attachments:
1) Project Description
Attach as Attachment A: Project Description. Provide a detailed written description that concisely and completely describes the project and location. Include the following information:
• All activities proposed for the site or project, including roads utilized, construction staging areas, and the installation of underground facilities, to ensure the entire project is covered by the HCP/NCCP permit
• Proposed construction dates, including details on construction phases, if applicable • Reference a City/County application number for the project, if applicable • General Best Management Practices, if applicable
• If the project will have temporary impacts, please provide a restoration plan describing how the site will be restored to pre-project conditions, including revegetation seed mixes or plantings and timing 2) Project Vicinity Map
Provide a project vicinity map. Attach as Figure 1 in Attachment B: Figures. 3) Project Site Plans
Provide any project site plans for the project. Attach as Figure 2 in Attachment B: Figures. 4) CEQA Document
Indicate the status of CEQA documents prepared for the project. Provide additional comments below table if necessary.

Type of Document Status Date Completed
Initial Study underway 2022
Notice of Preparation
Draft EIR
Final EIR
Notice of Categorical Exemption
Notice of Statutory Exemption
Other (describe)
III. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND IMPACTS
Please complete and/or provide the following attachments:
1) Field-Verified Land Cover Map2
Attach a field-verified land cover map in Attachment B: Figures and label as Figure 3. The map should contain all land cover types present on-site overlaid on aerial/satellite imagery. Map colors for the land cover types should conform to the HCP/NCCP (see Figure 3-3: Landcover in the Inventory Area for land cover type legend).
2) Photographs of the Project Site
Attach representative photos of the project site in Attachment B: Figures and label as Figure 4. Please provide captions for each photo.
2 For PSEs and city or county public works projects, please also identify permanent and temporary impact areas by overlaying crosshatching (permanent impacts) and hatching (temporary impacts) on the land cover map.
349

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
3) Land Cover Types and Impacts and Supplemental Tables • For all terrestrial land cover types please provide calculations to the nearest hundredth of an acre (0.01).

For aquatic land cover types please provide calculations to the nearest thousandth of an acre (0.001). • Permanent Impacts are broadly defined in the ECCC HCP/NCCP to include all areas removed from an undeveloped or habitat-providing state and includes land in the same parcel or project that is not developed, graded, physically altered, or directly affected in any way but is isolated from natural areas by the covered activity. Unless such undeveloped land is dedicated to the Preserve System or is a deed-restricted creek setback, the development mitigation fee will apply (if proposed, would require Conservancy approval). • Temporary Impacts are broadly defined in the ECCC HCP/NCCP as any impact on vegetation or habitat that does not result in permanent habitat removal (i.e. vegetation can eventually recover). • If wetland (riparian woodland/scrub, wetland, or aquatic) land cover types are present on the parcel but will not be impacted please discuss in the following section 4) Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters. Wetland impact fees will only be charged if wetland features are impacted. However, development fees will apply to the entire parcel. • Stream land cover type is considered a linear feature where impacts are calculated based on length impacted. The acreage within a stream, below Top of Bank (TOB), must be assigned to the adjacent land cover type(s). Insert area of impact to stream below TOB in parentheses after the Land Cover acreage number (e.g., Riparian Woodland/Scrub: 10 (0.036) – where 10 is the total impacted acreage including 0.036 acre, which is the acreage within stream TOB).

Complete following supplemental Stream Feature Detail table to provide information for linear feet. • Total Impacts acreage should be the total parcel acreage (development project) or project footprint acreage (rural infrastructure or utility project).

Table 1: Land Cover Types and Impacts
Land Cover Type Permanent
Impacts
Temporary
Impacts
Stream Setback Preserve System
Dedication
Grassland
Annual Grassland
Alkali Grassland
Ruderal 20.10
Shrubland
Chaparral and Scrub
Woodland
Oak Savannah
Oak Woodland
Riparian
Riparian Woodland/Scrub
Wetland
Permanent Wetland
Seasonal Wetland
Alkali Wetland
Aquatic
Aquatic (Reservoir/Open Water)
Slough/Channel
Pond
Stream (in linear feet) - - - -
Irrigated Agriculture
Pasture
Cropland
Orchard
Vineyard
Other
Nonnative woodland
Wind turbines
Developed (not counted toward Fees)
Urban 0.65
Aqueduct
Turf
Landfill
TOTAL IMPACTS 20.75
Proposed for HCP/NCCP
Dedication on the Parcel
(Requires Conservancy Approval)
350

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
Identify any uncommon vegetation and uncommon landscape features3:

Supplemental to Table 1: Uncommon Vegetation and Landscape Features Please provide details of impacts to stream features:

Stream Name: None
Watershed:

Supplemental to Table 1: Stream Feature Detail5
3 These acreages are for Conservancy tracking purposes. Impacts to these uncommon vegetation and landscape features should be accounted for within the land cover types in Table 1 (e.g., x acres of purple needlegrass in this supplemental table should be accounted for within annual grassland in Table 1). 4 Insert amount/number, not acreage. Provide additional information on these features in Attachment A: Project Description. 5 Use more than 1 row as necessary to describe impacts to streams on site. 6 See glossary (Appendix A) for definition of stream type and order. 7 Stream length is measured along stream centerline, based on length of impact to any part of the stream channel, TOB to TOB.

Permanent
Impacts
Temporary
Impacts
Uncommon Grassland Alliances
Purple Needlegrass Grassland
Blue Wildrye Grassland
Creeping Ryegrass Grassland
Wildflower Fields
Squirreltail Grassland
One-sided Bluegrass Grassland
Serpentine Bunchgrass Grassland
Saltgrass Grassland
Alkali Sacaton Bunchgrass Grassland
Other
Uncommon Landscape Features
Rock Outcrops
Caves
Springs and seeps
Scalds
Sand Deposits
Mines4
Buildings (bat roosts)3
Potential nest sites (trees or cliffs)3 7 trees
Stream Width Stream Type6 Permanent Impacts
(linear feet)7
Temporary Impacts
(linear feet)7
≤ 25 feet wide
> 25 feet wide
Perennial
Intermittent
Ephemeral, 3rd or higher order
Ephemeral, 1st or 2nd order

≤ 25 feet wide
> 25 feet wide
Perennial
Intermittent
Ephemeral, 3rd or higher order
Ephemeral, 1st or 2nd order

≤ 25 feet wide
> 25 feet wide
Perennial
Intermittent
Ephemeral, 3rd or higher order
Ephemeral, 1st or 2nd order

351

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
4) Summary of Land Cover Types
Please provide a written summary of descriptions for land cover types found on site including characteristic vegetation.

The first field survey conducted at the site was on October 21, 2020. This report reflects current site conditions based on the recent May 13th, 2022 field survey.

Ruderal Grassland: The project site is an open field that contained rows of recently cut grasses and weeds presumably being prepared for a hay harvest; there are weedier strips of grassland along the edges of the site (fence lines, road, and railroad tracks) and around the barn in the site (Figures 4a – 4d). Grasslands in the site have been highly disturbed by past agricultural use, grazing, development on the site and surrounding parcels, and other human activities (Figure 3). Dominant grassland species in the site include oats (Avena fatua), ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus), prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola), black mustard (Brassica nigra), telegraph weed (Heterotheca grandiflora), long-beaked stork’s fill (Erodium botrys), and Russian thistle (Salsola tragus).

Urban/Developed: The developed areas in the site include an historical driveway from Sellers Avenue that leads to the barn in the north part of the site; this driveway is barely discernible in present day. The barn, graveled and landscaped areas surrounding the barn, and a small structure northwest of the barn are also considered urban (Figure 3 and 4d).

There are 7 trees in the project site. There are six ornamental trees associated with the large barn and an olive tree in the northeast corner of the site adjacent to Sellers Avenue. 5) Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters
If wetlands and waters are present on the project site, project proponents must conduct a delineation of jurisdictional wetlands and waters. Jurisdictional wetlands and waters are defined on pages 1-18 and 1-19 of the ECCC HCP/NCCP as the following land cover types: permanent wetland, seasonal wetland, alkali wetland, aquatic, pond, slough/channel, and stream. It should be noted that these features differ for federal and state jurisdictions. If you have identified any of these land cover types in Table 1, complete the section below. a) Attach the wetland delineation report as Attachment E: Wetland Delineation. If a wetland delineation has not been completed, please explain below in section 4c. b) Please check the following permits the project may require. Please submit copies of these permits to the Conservancy prior to the start of construction:

CWA Section 404 Permit8 CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification Waste Discharge Requirements Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement c) Provide any additional information on impacts to jurisdictional wetland and waters below, including status of the permit(s):

An assessment of potentially jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. or wetlands in the site was undertaken on May 13, 2022. There are no potentially jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. or wetlands of any type in the site. The site consists primarily of highly disturbed ruderal grassland, with soils that appear to be well draining. 8 The USACE Sacramento District issued a Regional General Permit 1 (RGP) related to ECCC HCP/NCCP covered activities. The RGP is designed to streamline wetland permitting in the entire ECCC HCP/NCCP Plan Area by coordinating the avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures in the Plan with the Corps’ wetland permitting requirement. Applicants seeking authorization under this RGP shall notify the Corps in accordance with RGP general condition number 18 (Notification). 352

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
6) Species-Specific Planning Survey Requirements
Based on the land cover types found on-site and identified in Table 1, check the applicable boxes in Table 2a.

Table 2a. Species –Specific Planning Survey Requirements Land Cover Type
in Project Area Required Survey Species Habitat Element in Project Area Planning Survey Requirement9 Info in HCP Grasslands,
oak savannah,
agriculture, or
ruderal
San Joaquin kit fox Assumed if within modeled range
of species
If within modeled range of species,
identify and map potential breeding or
denning habitat within the project site
and a 250-ft radius around the project
footprint.
pp. 6-37
to 6-38
Western burrowing
owl
Assumed Identify and map potential breeding
habitat within the project site and a
500-ft radius around the project
footprint. Please note the HCP
requires buffers for occupied burrows.

Surveys may need to encompass an
area larger than the project footprint.
pp. 6-39
to 6-41
Aquatic
(ponds,
wetlands,
streams, sloughs,
channels, and
marshes)
Giant garter snake Aquatic habitat accessible from
the San Joaquin River
Identify and map potential habitat. pp. 6-43
to 6-45
California tiger
salamander
Ponds and wetlands
Vernal pools
Reservoirs
Small lakes
Identify and map potential breeding
habitat. Document habitat quality and
features. Provide the Conservancy
with photo-documentation and report.
pp. 6-45
California
red-legged frog
Slow-moving streams, ponds and
wetlands
Identify and map potential breeding
habitat. Document habitat quality and
features. Provide the Conservancy
with photo-documentation and report.
p. 6-46
Covered shrimp Seasonal wetlands
Vernal pools
Sandstone rock outcrops
Sandstone depressions
Identify and map potential habitat.

Please note the HCP requires a 50 foot
non-disturbance buffer from seasonal
wetlands that may be occupied by
covered shrimp. Surveys may need to
encompass an area larger than the
project footprint.
pp. 6-46
to 6-48
Any Townsend’s big-eared
bat
Rock formations with caves
Mines
Abandoned buildings outside
urban area
Map and document potential breeding
or roosting habitat.
pp. 6-36
to 6-37
Swainson’s hawk Potential nest sites within 1,000
feet of project
Inspect large trees for presence of nest
sites. Document and map.
pp. 6-41
to 6-43
Golden Eagle Potential nest sites with ½ mile of
project
Inspect large trees for presence of nest
sites. Document and map.
pp. 6-38
to 6-39
Surveys for all covered species must be conducted by a qualified biologist (USFWS/CDFW project-specific approved). Please submit biologist approval request to the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy.

Surveys for all covered species must be conducted according to the respective USFWS or CDFW survey protocols, as identified in Chapter

6.4.3 in the HCP/NCCP.
7) Planning Survey Species Habitat Maps
Provide Planning Survey Species Habitat Maps as required in Table 2a, attach as Figure 5 in Attachment B:

Figures.
9 The planning survey requirements in this table are not comprehensive. Please refer to Chapter 6.4.3 in the ECCC HCP/NCCP for more detail. 353

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
8) Results of Species Specific Surveys
Provide a written summary describing the results of the planning surveys. Please discuss the location, quantity, and quality of suitable habitat for specified covered wildlife species on the project site.

General Setting: The project site is in Oakley, in Contra Costa County, California (Figure 1). The site is within Section 31 in Township 2 North, Range 3 East of the USGS 7.5-minute Brentwood topographic quadrangle (Figure 1). The site is situated at an elevation of approximately 20 feet above mean sea level. Land uses in this portion of Oakley are primarily residential and agricultural. Sellers Avenue bounds the east edge of the site and railroad tracks bound the west edge of the site. There is a residential subdivision to the west of the railroad tracks. The south edge of the site is adjacent to a fallow field and the north edge of the site is adjacent to ranchette-style residential parcels.

Western Burrowing Owl: The project site contains ruderal grassland and is within the range of western burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia). California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB, 2022) does not contain any records of western burrowing owl within 500 feet of the site (Figure 5b) The nearest record of burrowing owl in the CNDDB (2022) search area is approximately

0.25 miles northwest of the site. The site was inspected for burrowing owls and ground squirrel burrows with evidence of burrowing owl occupancy (i.e., white wash, pellets, feathers). Comprehensive inspection of potential burrowing owl habitat was accomplished by walking meandering transects throughout the property.

No western burrowing owls or burrows with evidence of burrowing owl occupancy were observed. Very few ground squirrel burrows were observed in the project site; the burrows were primarily located along the southern fence line and along the railroad tracks.

Swainson’s Hawk: The site contains areas of ruderal grassland and is along the western edge of the range of Swainson’s hawks (Buteo swainsoni). There are 7 trees in the site that are potentially suitable for nesting Swainson’s hawks, as well as several potential nest trees near and visible from the site. Trees in the site and visible from the site were inspected for raptor stick nests. No raptor stick nests were observed in the on-site trees or in trees visible from the site. No Swainson’s hawks were observed during the field survey, which was conducted just outside of the nesting season of this species. CDFW’s CNDDB contains no occurrences of Swainson’s hawk within 1,000 feet of the site and only 1 record within 0.5 mile of the site (Figure 5b).

Golden Eagle: The site contains ruderal grassland and is within the range of golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos).

CDFW’s CNDDB contains no occurrences of golden eagle within 0.5 miles of the site or within the larger geographical area depicted in Figure 5b. There are 7 trees in the site that are potentially suitable for nesting golden eagles and only a few potential nest trees near and visible from the site. Trees on the site and visible from the site were inspected for raptor stick nests. No raptor stick nests were observed in the trees on site or any of the off-site trees visible from the site. No golden eagles were observed and this species nests more often on cliffs in remote natural areas than in trees near urban areas. 9) Covered and No-Take Plants
Please check the applicable boxes in Table 2b based on the land cover types found in the project area. If suitable land cover types are present on site, surveys must be conducted using approved CDFW/USFWS methods during the appropriate season for identification of covered and no-take species (see page 6-9 of the ECCC HCP/NCCP). Reference populations of covered and no-take plants should be visited, where possible, prior to conducting surveys to confirm that the plant species is visible and detectable at the time surveys are conducted. In order to complete all the necessary covered and no-take plant surveys, spring, summer, and fall surveys may be required.
354

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
Table 2b. Covered and No-Take Plant Species
Plant Species
Covered
(C) or NoTake (N)Associated Land
Cover Type
Typical Habitat or Physical Conditions, if
Known
Typical Blooming
Period
Suitable Land
Cover Type
Present
Adobe navarretia
(Navarretia nigelliformis ssp.
radians) a
C Annual Grassland Generally found on clay barrens in Annual Grassland b
Apr–Jun Yes
No
Alkali milkvetch
(Astragalus tener ssp. tener)
N Alkali grassland
Alkali wetland
Annual grassland
Seasonal wetland
Generally found in vernally moist habitat in soils with a slight to strongly elevated pH
Mar–Jun Yes
No
Big tarplant
(Blepharizonia plumosa)
C Annual grassland Elevation below 1500 feet d most often on Altamont Series or Complex soils
Jul–Oct Yes
No
Brewer’s dwarf flax
(Hesperolinon breweri)
C Annual grassland
Chaparral and scrub
Oak savanna
Oak woodland
Generally, restricted to grassland areas within a 500+
buffer from oak woodland and/or chaparral/scrub d
May–Jul Yes
No
Brittlescale
(Atriplex depressa)
C Alkali grassland
Alkali wetland
Restricted to soils of the Pescadero or Solano soil
series; generally found in southeastern region of plan
area d
May–Oct Yes
No
Caper-fruited tropidocarpum
(Tropidocarpum capparideum)
N Alkali grassland Mar–Apr Yes
No
Contra Costa goldfields
(Lasthenia conjugens)
N Alkali grassland
Alkali wetland
Annual grassland
Seasonal wetland
Generally found in vernal pools Mar–Jun Yes
No
Diablo Helianthella
(Helianthella castanea)
C Chaparral and scrub
Oak savanna
Oak woodland
Elevations generally above 650 feet d Mar–Jun Yes
No
Diamond-petaled poppy
(Eschscholzia rhombipetala)
N Annual grassland Mar–Apr Yes
No
Large-flowered fiddleneck
(Amsinckia grandiflora)
N Annual grassland Generally on clay soil Apr–May Yes
No
Mount Diablo buckwheat
(Eriogonum truncatum)
N Annual grassland
Chaparral and scrub
Ecotone of grassland and chaparral/scrub Apr–Sep Yes
No
Mount Diablo fairy-lantern
(Calochortus pulchellus)
C Annual grassland
Chaparral and scrub
Oak savanna
Oak woodland
Elevations generally between 650 and 2,600d Apr–Jun Yes No
Mount Diablo Manzanita
(Arctostaphylos auriculata)
C Chaparral and scrub Elevations generally between 700 and 1,860 feet; restricted to the eastern and northern flanks of Mt.

Diablo d and the vicinity of Black Diamond Mines
Jan–Mar Yes
No
Recurved larkspur
(Delphinium recurvatum)
C Alkali grassland
Alkali wetland
Mar–Jun Yes
No
Round-leaved filaree
(California macrophylla) c
C Annual grassland Mar–May Yes
No
San Joaquin spearscale
(Extriplex joaquiniana) e
C Alkali grassland
Alkali wetland
Apr–Oct Yes
No
Showy madia
(Madia radiata)
C Annual grassland
Oak savanna
Oak woodland
Primarily occupies open grassland or grassland on
edge of oak woodland
Mar–May Yes
No
a The species Navarretia nigelliformis subsp. nigelliformis is no longer considered to occur within Contra Costa County based on specimen annotations at the UC and Jepson Herbaria at the University of California Berkeley as well as the opinions of experts in the genus. This taxon is now recognized as Navarretia nigelliformis subsp. radians. Any subspecies of Navarretia nigelliformis encountered as a part of botanical surveys in support of a PSR should be considered as covered under this HCP/NCCP. b Habitat for the Navarretia nigelliformis subspecies that occurs within the inventory are is inaccurately described in the HCP/NCCP as vernal pools. The entity within the Inventory generally occupies clay barrens within Annual Grassland habitat, which is an upland habitat type. c From California Native Plant Society. 2007. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v7-07d). Sacramento, CA. Species may be identifiable outside of the typical blooming period; a professional botanist shall determine if a covered or no take plant occurs on the project site. Reference population of covered and no-take plants should be visited, where possible, prior to conducting surveys to confirm that the plant is visible and detectable at the time surveys are conducted. d See Species Profiles in Appendix D of the Final HCP/NCCP. Reference populations of covered and no-take plants should be visited, where possible, prior to conducting surveys to confirm that the plant species is visible and detectable at the time surveys are conducted. e In the recent update to the Jepson eflora (JFP 2013) Atriplex joaquinana has been circumscribed and segregated into a new genus called Extriplex based on the work of Elizabeth Zacharias and Bruce Baldwin (2010). The etymology of the genus Extriplex means, “beyond or outside Atriplex”. 355

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
10) Results of Covered and No-Take Plant Species
Provide a written summary describing the results of the planning surveys conducted as required in Table 2b.

Describe the methods used to survey the site for all covered and no-take plants, including the dates and times of all surveys conducted (see Tables 3-8 and 6-5 of the ECCC HCP/NCCP for covered and no-take plants), including reference populations visited prior to conducting surveys.

If any covered or no-take plant species were found, include the following information in the results summary:
• Description and number of occurrences and their rough population size. • Description of the “health” of each occurrence, as defined on pages 5-49 and 5-50 of the HCP/NCCP. • A map of all the occurrences.
• Justification of surveying time window, if outside of the plant’s blooming period. • The CNDDB form(s) submitted to CDFW (if this is a new occurrence). • A description of the anticipated impacts that the covered activity will have on the occurrence and how the project will avoid impacts to all covered and no-take plant species. If impacts to covered plant species cannot be avoided and plants will be removed by covered activity, the Conservancy must be notified and has the option to salvage the covered plants. All projects must demonstrate avoidance of all six no-take plants (see table 6-5 of the HCP/NCCP).

Survey Methods
Surveys to assess potentially suitable habitat for special-status plants were undertaken on October 21, 2020 and May 13, 2022. The site was systematically searched by walking throughout the site.

Survey Results and Discussion
The site is ruderal grassland that is periodically mowed and/or disked. Due to an absence of potentially suitable habitat for special-status plants, focused surveys during the blooming period of each species in Table 2b were not warranted.

IV. SPECIES-SPECIFIC AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENTS Please complete and/or provide the following attachments:
1) Species-Specific Avoidance and Minimization for Selected Covered Wildlife Complete the following table and check the applicable box for covered species determined by the planning surveys.

Table 3. Summary of Applicable Preconstruction Surveys, Avoidance and Minimization, and Construction Monitoring Requirements10
Species Preconstruction Survey
Requirements
Avoidance and Minimization
Requirements Construction Monitoring Required Info in HCP San
Joaquin
kit fox
• On project footprint and 250-ft
radius, map all dens (>5 in.
diameter) and determine status
• Provide written survey results
to USFWS within 5 working
days after surveying
• Monitor dens
• Destroy unoccupied dens
• Discourage use of occupied (nonnatal) dens
• Establish exclusion zones ( >50 ft
for potential dens, and >100 ft for
known dens)
• Notify USFWS of occupied natal
dens
pp. 6-37
to 6-38
Western
burrowing
owl
• On project footprint and 500-ft
radius, identify and map all
owls and burrows, and
determine status
• Document use of habitat (e.g.
breeding, foraging)
• Avoid occupied nests during
breeding season (Feb-Sep)
• Avoid occupied burrows during
nonbreeding season (Sep – Feb)
• Install one-way doors in occupied
burrow (if avoidance not possible)
• Monitor burrows with doors
installed
• Establish buffer zones (250 ft
around nests)
• Establish buffer zones (160 ft
around burrows)
pp. 6-39
to 6-41
10 The requirements in this table are not comprehensive; they are detailed in the next section on the following page. 356

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
Giant
garter
snake
• Delineate aquatic habitat up to
200 ft from water’s edge on
each side
• Document any occurrences
• Limit construction to Oct-May
• Dewater habitat April 15 – Sep 30
prior to construction
• Minimize clearing for construction
• Delineate 200 ft buffer around
potential habitat near construction
• Provide field report on monitoring
efforts
• Stop construction activities if
snake is encountered; allow snake
to passively relocate
• Remove temporary fill or debris
from construction site
• Mandatory training for
construction personnel
pp. 6-43
to 6-45
California
tiger
salamander
• Provide written notification to
USFWS and CDFW regarding
timing of construction and
likelihood of occurrence on site
• Allow agency staff to translocate
species, if requested
• None p. 6-45
California
red-legged
frog
• Provide written notification to
USFWS and CDFW regarding
timing of construction and
likelihood of occurrence on site
• Allow agency staff to translocate
species, if requested
• None p. 6-46
Covered
shrimp
• Establish presence/absence
• Document and evaluate use of
all habitat features (e.g. vernal
pools, rock outcrops)
• Establish buffer near construction
activities
• Prohibit incompatible activities
• Establish buffer around outer edge
of all hydric vegetation associated
with habitat (50 ft or immediate
watershed, whichever is larger)
• Mandatory training for
construction personnel
pp. 6-46
to 6-48
Townsend’s
big-eared
bat
• Establish presence/absence
• Determine if potential sites
were recently occupied (guano)
• Seal hibernacula before Nov
• Seal nursery sites before April
• Delay construction near occupied
sites until hibernation or nursery
seasons are over
• None pp. 6-36
to 6-37
Swainson’s
hawk
• Determine whether potential
nests are occupied
• No construction within 1,000 ft of
occupied nests within breeding
season (March 15 - Sep 15)
• If necessary, remove active nest
tree after nesting season to
prevent occupancy in second year.
• Establish 1,000 ft buffer around
active nest and monitor
compliance (no activity within
established buffer)
pp. 6-41
to 6-43
Golden
Eagle
• Establish presence/absence of
nesting eagles
• No construction within ½ mile near
active nests (most activity late Jan
– Aug)
• Establish ½ mile buffer around
active nest and monitor
compliance with buffer
pp. 6-38
to 6-39
2) Required Preconstruction Surveys, Avoidance and Minimization, and Construction Monitoring All preconstruction surveys shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 6.4.3, Species-Level Measures, and Table 6-1 of the ECCC HCP/NCCP. Detailed descriptions of preconstruction surveys, avoidance and minimization, and construction monitoring applicable to each of the wildlife species in Table 3 are located below. Please remove the species-specific measures that do not apply to your project (highlight entire section and delete).

WESTERN BURROWING OWL
Preconstruction Surveys
Prior to any ground disturbance related to covered activities, a USFWS/CDFW- approved biologist will conduct a preconstruction survey in areas identified in the planning surveys as having potential burrowing owl habitat. The surveys will establish the presence or absence of western burrowing owl and/or habitat features and evaluate use by owls in accordance with CDFW survey guidelines (California Department of Fish and Game 1995).

On the parcel where the activity is proposed, the biologist will survey the proposed disturbance footprint and a 500- foot radius from the perimeter of the proposed footprint to identify burrows and owls. Adjacent parcels under different land ownership will not be surveyed. Surveys should take place near sunrise or sunset in accordance with CDFW guidelines. All burrows or burrowing owls will be identified and mapped. Surveys will take place no more than 30 days prior to construction. During the breeding season (February 1– August 31), surveys will document whether burrowing owls are nesting in or directly adjacent to disturbance areas. During the nonbreeding season (September 1–January 31), surveys will document whether burrowing owls are using habitat in or directly adjacent to any 357

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
disturbance area. Survey results will be valid only for the season (breeding or nonbreeding) during which the survey is conducted.

Avoidance and Minimization and Construction Monitoring
This measure incorporates avoidance and minimization guidelines from CDFW’s Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Game 1995).

If burrowing owls are found during the breeding season (February 1 – August 31), the project proponent will avoid all nest sites that could be disturbed by project construction during the remainder of the breeding season or while the nest is occupied by adults or young. Avoidance will include establishment of a non-disturbance buffer zone (described below). Construction may occur during the breeding season if a qualified biologist monitors the nest and determines that the birds have not begun egg-laying and incubation or that the juveniles from the occupied burrows have fledged. During the nonbreeding season (September 1 – January 31), the project proponent should avoid the owls and the burrows they are using, if possible. Avoidance will include the establishment of a buffer zone (described below).

During the breeding season, buffer zones of at least 250 feet in which no construction activities can occur will be established around each occupied burrow (nest site). Buffer zones of 160 feet will be established around each burrow being used during the nonbreeding season. The buffers will be delineated by highly visible, temporary construction fencing.

If occupied burrows for burrowing owls are not avoided, passive relocation will be implemented. Owls should be excluded from burrows in the immediate impact zone and within a 160-foot buffer zone by installing one-way doors in burrow entrances. These doors should be in place for 48 hours prior to excavation. The project area should be monitored daily for 1 week to confirm that the owl has abandoned the burrow. Whenever possible, burrows should be excavated using hand tools and refilled to prevent reoccupation (California Department of Fish and Game 1995).

Plastic tubing or a similar structure should be inserted in the tunnels during excavation to maintain an escape route for any owls inside the burrow.

SWAINSON’S HAWK
Preconstruction Survey
Prior to any ground disturbance related to covered activities that occurs during the nesting season (March 15– September 15), a qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction survey no more than 1 month prior to construction to establish whether Swainson’s hawk nests within 1,000 feet of the project site are occupied. If potentially occupied nests within 1,000 feet are off the project site, then their occupancy will be determined by observation from public roads or by observations of Swainson’s hawk activity (e.g., foraging) near the project site. If nests are occupied, minimization measures and construction monitoring are required (see below).

Avoidance and Minimization and Construction Monitoring
During the nesting season (March 15–September 15), covered activities within 1,000 feet of occupied nests or nests under construction will be prohibited to prevent nest abandonment. If site-specific conditions or the nature of the covered activity (e.g., steep topography, dense vegetation, limited activities) indicate that a smaller buffer could be used, the Implementing Entity will coordinate with CDFW/USFWS to determine the appropriate buffer size.

If young fledge prior to September 15, covered activities can proceed normally. If the active nest site is shielded from view and noise from the project site by other development, topography, or other features, the project applicant can apply to the Implementing Entity for a waiver of this avoidance measure. Any waiver must also be approved by USFWS and CDFW. While the nest is occupied, activities outside the buffer can take place.

All active nest trees will be preserved on site, if feasible. Nest trees, including non-native trees, lost to covered activities will be mitigated by the project proponent according to the requirements below.

Mitigation for Loss of Nest Trees
The loss of non-riparian Swainson’s hawk nest trees will be mitigated by the project proponent by:
358

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
• If feasible on-site, planting 15 saplings for every tree lost with the objective of having at least 5 mature trees established for every tree lost according to the requirements listed below.

AND either
1) Pay the Implementing Entity an additional fee to purchase, plant, maintain, and monitor 15 saplings on the HCP/NCCP Preserve System for every tree lost according to the requirements listed below, OR 2) The project proponent will plant, maintain, and monitor 15 saplings for every tree lost at a site to be approved by the Implementing Entity (e.g., within an HCP/NCCP Preserve or existing open space linked to HCP/NCCP preserves), according to the requirements listed below.

The following requirements will be met for all planting options:
• Tree survival shall be monitored at least annually for 5 years, then every other year until year 12. All trees lost during the first 5 years will be replaced. Success will be reached at the end of 12 years if at least 5 trees per tree lost survive without supplemental irrigation or protection from herbivory. Trees must also survive for at least three years without irrigation.
• Irrigation and fencing to protect from deer and other herbivores may be needed for the first several years to ensure maximum tree survival.
• Native trees suitable for this site should be planted. When site conditions permit, a variety of native trees will be planted for each tree lost to provide trees with different growth rates, maturation, and life span, and to provide a variety of tree canopy structures for Swainson’s hawk. This variety will help to ensure that nest trees will be available in the short term (5-10 years for cottonwoods and willows) and in the long term (e.g., Valley oak, sycamore). This will also minimize the temporal loss of nest trees. • Riparian woodland restoration conducted as a result of covered activities (i.e., loss of riparian woodland) can be used to offset the nest tree planting requirement above, if the nest trees are riparian species. • Whenever feasible and when site conditions permit, trees should be planted in clumps together or with existing trees to provide larger areas of suitable nesting habitat and to create a natural buffer between nest trees and adjacent development (if plantings occur on the development site). • Whenever feasible, plantings on the site should occur closest to suitable foraging habitat outside the UDA. • Trees planted in the HCP/NCCP preserves or other approved offsite location will occur within the known range of Swainson’s hawk in the inventory area and as close as possible to high-quality foraging habitat.

GOLDEN EAGLE
Preconstruction Survey
Prior to implementation of covered activities, a qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction survey to establish whether nests of golden eagles are occupied (see Section 6.3.1, Planning Surveys). If nests are occupied, minimization requirements and construction monitoring will be required.

Avoidance and Minimization
Covered activities will be prohibited within 0.5 mile of active nests. Nests can be built and active at almost any time of the year, although mating and egg incubation occurs late January through August, with peak activity in March through July. If site-specific conditions or the nature of the covered activity (e.g., steep topography, dense vegetation, limited activities) indicate that a smaller buffer could be appropriate or that a larger buffer should be implemented, the Implementing Entity will coordinate with CDFW/USFWS to determine the appropriate buffer size.

Construction Monitoring
Construction monitoring will focus on ensuring that no covered activities occur within the buffer zone established around an active nest. Although no known golden eagle nest sites occur within or near the ULL, covered activities inside and outside of the Preserve System have the potential to disturb golden eagle nest sites. Construction monitoring will ensure that direct effects to golden eagles are minimized. 359

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
3) Construction Monitoring Plan
Before implementing a covered activity, the applicant will develop and submit a construction monitoring plan to the planning department of the local land use jurisdiction and the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy for review and approval. Elements of a brief construction monitoring plan will include the following:
• Results of planning and preconstruction surveys.11
• Description of avoidance and minimization measures to be implemented, including a description of project-specific refinements to the measures or additional measures not included in the HCP/NCCP. • Description of monitoring activities, including monitoring frequency and duration, and specific activities to be monitored.
• Description of the onsite authority of the construction monitor to modify implementation of the activity.

Check box to acknowledge this requirement.

V. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS ON COVERED ACTIVITIES
1) Check off the HCP conservation measures that apply to the project.

APPLIES TO ALL PROJECTS
Conservation Measure 1.11. Avoid Direct Impacts on Extremely Rare Plants, Fully Protected Wildlife Species, or Migratory Birds. This conservation measure applies to all projects. All projects will avoid all impacts on extremely rare plants and fully protected species listed in Table 6-5 of the ECCC HCP/NCCP. See HCP pp. 6-23 to 6-25, and Table 6-5.

APPLIES TO PROJECTS THAT IMPACT COVERED PLANT SPECIES
Conservation Measure 3.10. Plant Salvage when Impacts are Unavoidable. This condition applies to projects that cannot avoid impacts on covered plants and help protect covered plants by prescribing salvage whenever avoidance of impacts is not feasible. Project proponents wishing to remove populations of covered plants must notify the Conservancy of their construction schedule to allow the Conservancy the option of salvaging the populations. See HCP pp. 6-48 to 6-50.

APPLIES TO PROJECTS THAT INCLUDE ARE ADJACENT TO STREAMS, PONDS, OR WETLANDS Conservation Measure 2.12. Wetland, Pond, and Stream Avoidance and Minimization. All projects will implement measures described in the HCP to avoid and minimize impacts on wetlands, ponds, streams, and riparian woodland/scrub. See HCP pp. 6-33 to 6-35.

APPLIES TO NEW DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
Conservation Measure 1.10. Maintain Hydrologic Conditions and Minimize Erosion. All new development must avoid or minimize direct and indirect impacts on local hydrological conditions and erosion by incorporating the applicable Provision C.3 Amendments of the Contra Costa County Clean Water Program’s (CCCCWP’s) amended NPDES Permit (order no. R2-2003-0022; permit no. CAS002912). The overall goal of this measure is to ensure that new development covered under the HCP has no or minimal adverse effects on downstream fisheries to avoid take of fish listed under ESA or CESA. See HCP pp. 6-21 to 6-22.

APPLIES TO NEW DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS THAT INCLUDE OR ARE ADJACENT TO STREAMS, PONDS, OR WETLANDS Conservation Measure 1.7. Establish Stream Setbacks. A stream setback will be applied to all development projects covered by the HCP according to the stream types listed in Table 6-2 of the HCP. See HCP pp. 6-15 to 6-18 and Table 6-2.

APPLIES TO NEW DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ADJACENT TO EXISTING PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, HCP PRESERVES, OR LIKELY HCP ACQUISITION SITES
Conservation Measure 1.6. Minimize Development Footprint Adjacent to Open Space. Project applicants are encouraged to minimize their development footprint and set aside portions of their land to contribute to the HCP Preserve System. Land set aside that contributes to the HCP biological goals and objectives may be credited against development fees. See HCP pages 6-14 to 6-15.

Conservation Measure 1.8. Establish Fuel Management Buffer to Protect Preserves and Property. Buffer zones will provide a buffer between development and wildlands that allows adequate fuel management to minimize the risk of wildlife damage to property or to the preserve. The minimum buffer zone for new development is 100 feet. See HCP pages 6-18 to 6-19. 11 If the preconstruction surveys do not trigger construction monitoring, results of preconstruction surveys should still be submitted to the local jurisdiction and the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy.
360

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
Conservation Measure 1.9. Incorporate Urban-Wildlife Interface Design Elements. These projects will incorporate design elements at the urban-wildlife interface to minimize the indirect impacts of development on the adjacent preserve. See HCP pp. 6-20 to 6-21.

APPLIES TO ROAD MAINTENANCE PROJECTS OUTSIDE THE UDA
Conservation Measure 1.12. Implement Best Management Practices for Rural Road Maintenance. Road maintenance activities have the potential to affect covered species by introducing sediment and other pollutants into downstream waterways, spreading invasive weeds, and disturbing breeding wildlife. In order to avoid and minimize these impacts, BMPs described in the HCP will be used where appropriate and feasible. See HCP pp. 6-25 to 6-26.

APPLIES TO NEW ROADS OR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS OUTSIDE THE UDA Conservation Measure 1.14. Design Requirements for Covered Roads Outside the Urban Development Area (UDA). New roads or road improvements outside the UDA have impacts on many covered species far beyond the direct impacts of their project footprints. To minimize the impacts of new, expanded, and improved roads in agricultural and natural areas of the inventory area, road and bridge construction projects will adopt siting, design, and construction requirements described in the HCP and listed in Table 6-6. See HCP pp. 6-27 to 6-33 and Table 6-6.

APPLIES TO FLOOD CONTROL MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES
Conservation Measure 1.13. Implement Best Management Practices for Flood Control Facility Maintenance. Flood control maintenance activities have the potential to affect covered species by introducing sediment and other pollutants into downstream waterways and disturbing breeding wildlife. In order to avoid and minimize these impacts, BMPs described in the HCP will be used where appropriate and feasible. See HCP pp. 6-26 to 6-27.
2) For all checked conservation measures, describe how the project will comply with each measure.

Attach as Attachment C: Project Compliance to HCP Conditions.

VI. MITIGATION MEASURES
1) Mitigation Fee Calculator(s)
Complete and attach the fee calculator (use permanent and/or temporary impact fee calculator as appropriate), and attach as Attachment D: Fee Calculator(s). 2) Briefly describe the amount of fees to be paid and when applicant plans to submit payment.

The 20.75+/- acre site contains 20.10 acres of ruderal grassland and 0.65 acres of urban land.

The site is within Fee Zone 1 and construction is expected to commence in late-2022.

Using the current fee schedule, fees would be paid on 20.10+/- acres within Fee Zone 1, at a cost of $18,937.95 per acre ($380,652.83). Fees will be paid pursuant to the fee schedule that is in place at the time construction commences.
361
ATTACHMENT A: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
362
DeJesus Property
Project Description
May 2022
The 20.75+/- acre project site is along the west side of Sellers Road, approximately 0.5 miles south of Sellers Avenue, in Oakley, Contra Costa County, California (Figure 1). The site is within Sections 31 and 32, in Township 2 North, Range 3 East of the USGS 7.5- minute Brentwood topographic quadrangle. The project site includes a parcel encompassing 20.42+/- acres, and an offsite 0.33+/- acre sliver along Sellers Avenue.

MLC Holdings, Inc. plans to divide the property in to a 77-lot residential subdivision with single family medium-sized homes (Figures 2a -2c). Access to the site will be from tow locations along Sellers Avenue. One road will be in the approximate location as the existing access road in to the site and the second access point will be a new road along the south edge of the site. A network of roads and a cul-de-sac will provide access to all of lots in the subdivision. There will be an open space/water quality area in the west part of the site, adjacent to the railroad tracks.

The project may require minor improvements to the edge of Sellers Avenue for shoulder work and/or construction of a sidewalk along the edge of the road. If needed, these offsite improvements will occur on 0.33+/- acres of land immediately east of the site. The north edge of the site is reserved for the future extension of Laurel Road.

The proposed project will connect to existing City infrastructure to provide sewer and water to the site. The storm water will be detained in a water quality treatment basin prior to its discharge into the City’s storm drain system.

Standard construction best management practices (BMPs) will be employed during construction to minimize the potential for erosion and off-site transport of fines. BMPs will include use of water trucks, appropriate compaction of soil, and installation of straw wattles, silt fences or other technologies along the perimeter of the site during construction, and stabilization of bare soils as appropriate with seeding, straw, and/or hydromulch.

Construction is expected to begin in late-2022 and is expected to continue through 2023. 363
ATTACHMENT B: FIGURES
364
Site Map/USGS
DeJesus Property
City of Oakley, Contra Costa County, CA
^_
Study Area
. 0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Figure 1
Map Date: 10/29/2020
Moore Biological
C:\Users\owner\Documents\FEC_INC\Projects\Moore Biological\DeJesus_Property\MXD\dejesus_property_ecccp_figure_1.mxd Consultants
Study Area
USGS Base Map: BRENTWOOD, CA

7.5 minute topographic quadrangle
Section: 31
Township: 02N
Range: 03E
365
1 2 3 4 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
5 6 7 8 9
19 18
21 20
23 25
24 22
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33
37 34
35 36
40 38
39 41
46 49
48 47
43 45
44 57 42
56 55
54 53
52 51
50 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 69
66 67
68 72
70 71
77 76
75 74
73 PARCEL A SELLERS AVENUE

FUTURE LAUREL ROAD

RETENTION BASIN

PARCEL B

OPEN SPACE
48' STREET SECTION 56' STREET SECTION
40' STREET SECTION
F:\3247-000\ACAD\TM\TM-1.DWG
0 60 120 180 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
SHEET NO.

TM-1

GENERAL NOTES

VESTING TENTATIVE MAP

DEJESUS PROPERTY

SELLERS AVENUE

CITY OF OAKLEY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
Figure 2a: 7FTUJOH
5FOUBUJWF
.BQ 366
1 2
3 4
6 7
5 8
9 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 25 24 23 22 21 20
26 27
28 29
30 33 42
34 41
35 40
36 39
37 38
32 43
44 45
49 58
50 57
51 56
52 55
53 54
48 59
47 60
46 61
74 73
72 71
70 75
76 77
65 66
67 68
69 64
63 62
31 A A
B
B
C

C SELLERS AVENUE

FUTURE LAUREL ROAD

RETENTION BASIN

OPEN SPACE
LOT 61 LOT 7
F:\3247-000\ACAD\TM\TM-3.DWG
0 60 120 180 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
SHEET NO.

TM-3
LEGEND

SECTION A-A SECTION B-B SECTION C-C

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN

DEJESUS PROPERTY

SELLERS AVENUE

CITY OF OAKLEY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
Figure 2C: 1SFMJNJOBSZ
(SBEJOH Plan 367
1 2
3 4
6 7
5 8
9 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 25 24 23 22 21 20
26 27
28 29
30 33 42
34 41
35 40
36 39
37 38
32 43
44 45
49 58
50 57
51 56
52 55
53 54
48 59
47 60
46 61
74 73
72 71
70 75
76 77
65 66
67 68
69 64
63 62
31 SELLERS AVENUE

FUTURE LAUREL ROAD

RETENTION BASIN

OPEN SPACE

TYPICAL UTILITY SECTION
F:\3247-000\ACAD\TM\TM-4.DWG
0 60 120 180 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
SHEET NO.

TM-4
LEGEND

PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN

DEJESUS PROPERTY

SELLERS AVENUE

CITY OF OAKLEY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
Figure 2c: 1SFMJNJOBSZ
6UJMJUZ
Plan 368
Sellers Ave
Tuolumne Way
Yosemite Cir
Wildhorse Rd
Big Bend Ct
Kings Canyon Way
Vitale St
Driveway
C:\Users\owner\Documents\FEC_INC\Projects\Moore Biological\DeJesus_Property\MXD\dejesus_property_ecccp_figure_3.mxd Figure 3
Map Date: 10/29/2020
Aerial Source: Google Earth (02/2020)
Field Verified Landcover Map
City of Oakley, Contra Costa County, CA
DeJesus Property
On-Site (20.42 ac.)
Off-Site Improvements
(0.33 ac.)
Urban/Developed (0.65 ac.)
Ruderal Grassland (20.10 ac.)
Moore Biological
Consultants
0 250 500
.

On-Site 19.78 0.64
Off-Site 0.32 0.01
Total 20.10 0.65
Ruderal
Grassland (Acres)
Urban/Developed
(Acres)
369

MOORE BIOLOGICAL
Rows of recently cut hay in the body of the site, looking west from the east edge of the site; 05/13/22. This is the location of an old access road from Sellers Avenue to the large barn in the site.

Rows of recently cut hay in the west part of the site, looking southwest from the north edge of the site; 05/13/22.

FIGURE 4a

REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPHS
370

MOORE BIOLOGICAL
South edge of the site, looking west from the southeast corner of the site; 05/13/22.

East edge of the site, looking north along Sellers Avenue from the southeast corner of the site; 05/13/22. There will be road improvements along Sellers Avenue.

FIGURE 4b

REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPHS
371

MOORE BIOLOGICAL
North edge of the site, looking west from the northeast corner of the site; 05/13/22.

West edge of the site, looking northwest from the southwest corner of the site; 05/13/22. Railroad tracks are situated just west of the site.

FIGURE 4c

REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPHS
372

MOORE BIOLOGICAL
Ground squirrel burrows along the west edge of the site; 05/13/22. There are a few ground squirrels burrows within the site, primarily located along the railroad tracks and edges of the site.

Large barn and a few smaller structures in the north part of the site, looking northwest; 05/13/22. There are a total of six trees associated with the barn in the site.

FIGURE 4d

REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPHS
373
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!( Sellers Ave
Tuolumne Way
Yosemite Cir
Wildhorse Rd
Big Bend Ct
Kings Canyon Way
Vitale St
Driveway
C:\Users\owner\Documents\FEC_INC\Projects\Moore Biological\DeJesus_Property\MXD\dejesus_property_ecccp_figure_5a.mxd .
0 250 500
Figure 5a
Map Date: 10/29/2020
Aerial Source: Google Earth (02/2020)
Moore Biological
Consultants
Field Verified Landcover Map
City of Oakley, Contra Costa County, CA
DeJesus Property
!( Trees; assumed habitat for Swainson's hawk,
golden eagle, and white-tailed kite. Urban/Developed (0.65 ac.) Ruderal Grassland (20.10 ac.); assumed
habitat for western burrowing owl.

On-Site (20.42 ac.)
Off-Site Improvements
(0.33 ac.)
On-Site 19.78 0.64
Off-Site 0.32 0.01
Total 20.10 0.65
Ruderal
Grassland (Acres)
Urban/Developed
(Acres)
374
C:\Users\owner\Documents\FEC_INC\Projects\Moore Biological\DeJesus_Property\MXD\dejesus_property_ecccp_figure_5b.mxd Regional Species Habitat Map
City of Oakley, Contra Costa County, CA
. 0 500 1,000
Figure 5b
Map Date: 10/29/2020
Aerial Photo: DigitalGlobe (2020)
DeJesus Property
Moore Biological
Consultants
Western Burrowing Owl
Potential Habitat within 500 ft.

Study Area
Swainson Hawk
Potential Habitat within 1,000 ft.

Golden Eagle
Potential Habitat within 0.5 miles
Western Burrowing Owl
Swainson's hawk
White-tailed kite
375
ATTACHMENT C: PROJECT COMPLIANCE TO HCP CONDITIONS
376
DeJesus Property
Project Compliance to HCP Conditions
May 2022
HCP/NCCP Conservation Measure 1.11. Avoid Direct Impacts on Extremely Rare Plants, Fully Protected Wildlife Species, or Covered Migratory Birds:

The potential for special-status plants to occur within the site is considered extremely remote, as described in Section III (10).

Species-specific pre-construction surveys, and if needed, monitoring and avoidance requirements for burrowing owl, Swainson’s hawk, and golden eagle will be conducted as described in Section IV (2). There is no suitable habitat in the site for ringtail (Bassariscus astutus), a “fully protected species,” per California Fish and Game Code Section 4700.

Similarly, there is no suitable nesting habitat in the site for peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus), a “fully protected species,” per California Fish and Game Code Section 3511.

White-tailed kite (Elanus caeruleus), another “fully protected species,” per California Fish and Game Code Section 3511 could potentially nest in trees in and near the site. This species is documented in CDFW’s CNDDB in two locations within 0.5 mile of the site (Figure 5b). Prior to any ground disturbance related to covered activities that occur during the nesting season (March 15-August 31), a qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction survey no more than 1 month prior to construction to establish whether white-tailed kite is nesting in trees in or visible from the site. In the event active nests are found, the applicant shall notify the Implementing Entity (i.e., City of Oakley) and consult with CDFW for further guidance.

On-site tree, shrubs, and grasslands could be used by other species of nesting birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. If possible, vegetation removal will occur outside of the general bird nesting season (February 1 through August 31). Alternately, a qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction survey no more than 2 weeks prior to vegetation removal. In the event active nests are found, the applicant shall notify the Implementing Entity and consult with CDFW for further guidance.

HCP/NCCP Conservation Measure 1.10. Maintain Hydrologic Conditions and Minimize Erosion:

The project has been designed to maintain hydrologic conditions and minimize erosion. Standard construction best management practices (BMPs) will be employed during construction to minimize the potential for erosion and off-site transport of fines.

BMPs will include use of water trucks, appropriate compaction of soil, and installation of straw wattles, silt fences or other technologies along the perimeter of the site during construction, and stabilization of bare soils as appropriate with seeding, straw, and/or hydromulch.
377
ATTACHMENT D: FEE CALCULATOR
378
ECCC HCP/NCCP 2022 Fee Calculator Worksheet
Clayton, Oakley, Pittsburg, County, PSE1
Permanent Impacts
PROJECT APPLICANT:

PROJECT NAME:

APN(s):

JURISDICTION:

DATE:

DEVELOPMENT FEE

PERMANENT IMPACTS
(ACRES)
2022 FEE/ACRE
subject to change 2
Fee Zone 1 20.10 x $18,937.95 = $380,652.83
Fee Zone 2 x $37,875.90 = $0.00
Fee Zone 3 x $9,468.98 = $0.00
Fee Zone 43 x $28,406.93 = $0.00
Development Fee Total = $380,652.83

WETLAND MITIGATION FEE

PERMANENT IMPACTS
(ACRES)
2022 FEE/ACRE
subject to change 2
x $105,515.99 = $0.00
Perennial Wetland x $159,911.71 = $0.00
Seasonal Wetland x $374,220.31 = $0.00
Alkali Wetland x $378,310.21 = $0.00
Ponds x $205,923.71 = $0.00
Aquatic (open water) x $102,962.44 = $0.00
Slough / Channel x $147,029.10 = $0.00

STREAMS

PERMANENT IMPACTS
(LINEAR FEET)
2022 FEE/LINEAR FT
subject to change 2
x $542.59 = $0.00
x $814.47 = $0.00
Wetland Mitigation Fee Total = $0.00
FEE REDUCTION5 Development Fee reduction for land in lieu of fee = Development Fee reduction (up to 33% ) for permanent assessments = Wetland Mitigation Fee reduction for wetland restoration/creation performed by applicant = Reduction Total = $0.00
FINAL FEE CALCULATION Development Fee Total $380,652.83 Wetland Mitigation Fee Total + $0.00
Mitigation Fee Subtotal = $380,652.83
+
= $380,652.83
5 Fee reductions must be reviewed and approved by the Conservancy.

MLC Holdings, Inc.

DeJesus Property
033-150-013
May 2022
Oakley
4 Per Chapter 9.3.1 of the HCP/NCCP, for every acre of impact on wetlands, streams, ponds, and riparian woodland/scrub, applicants will pay the appropriate development fee (according to fee zone) towards land acquisition and the conservation program as a whole, as well as a wetland mitigation fee to cover the costs of successful restoration or creation.

Impacts to riparian/scrub, wetlands, ponds,
aquatic, and slough/channel are charged both a
wetland mitigation fee and a development fee.

Please also include these impact acres to
development fee above.4
See appropriate ordinance or HCP/NCCP Figure 9-
1 to determine Fee Zone
March 10, 2022
Contribution to Recovery6
Streams greater than 25 feet wide
1 The City of Brentwood is on a separate fee schedule until the 2017 Fee Audit has been adopted by the city. For projects within Brentwood, please use the Brentwood fee calculator worksheets.

TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE PAID
3 Fee Zone 4 is not shown on Figure 9-1 of the HCP/NCCP but refers to the fee applicable to those few covered acitivities located in northeastern Antioch (p. 9-21). 2 Development fees are adjusted annually (no later than March 15 of each year) according to a formula that includes both a Home Price Index (HPI) and a Consumer Price Index (CPI). The Wetland Mitigation Fees are adjusted according to a CPI.

Streams 25 feet wide or less
6 Participating Special Entities (PSEs) are required to pay fees over and above permanent and temporary impact mitigation fees to cover indirect costs of extending permit coverage, including a portion of the costs of the initial preparation of the Plan, and a portion of the costs of conservation actions designed to contribute to species recovery. This amount will be determined in accordance with the Contribution to Recovery Implementation Policy adopted by the Conservancy Governing Board on December 8, 2014.

Riparian woodland / scrub
379
Appendix C
CNDDB Search Results
380
8/26/22, 11:07 AM Print View
https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/rarefind/view/QuickElementListView.html 1/1 Query Summary:

Quad IS (Brentwood (3712186))
AND Other Status CONTAINS (CDFW_FP-Fully Protected OR CDFW_SSC-Species of Special Concern) Print Close
CNDDB Element Query Results
Scientific
Name
Common
Name
Taxonomic
Group
Element
Code
Total
Occs
Returned
Occs
Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
CA
Rare
Plant
Rank
Other
Status Habitats
Agelaius
tricolor
tricolored
blackbird Birds ABPBXB0020 955 1 None Threatened G1G2 S1S2 null BLM_S-Sensitive, CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special Concern,
IUCN_EN-Endangered,
NABCI_RWL-Red Watch List,
USFWS_BCC-Birds of
Conservation Concern
Freshwater marsh, Marsh & swamp, Swamp, Wetland
Anniella
pulchra
Northern
California
legless
lizard
Reptiles ARACC01020 383 3 None None G3 S3 null CDFW_SSC-Species of Special Concern, USFS_S-Sensitive Chaparral, Coastal dunes, Coastal scrub Athene
cunicularia
burrowing
owl Birds ABNSB10010 2011 48 None None G4 S3 null
BLM_S-Sensitive, CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special Concern,
IUCN_LC-Least Concern,
USFWS_BCC-Birds of
Conservation Concern
Coastal prairie, Coastal scrub, Great Basin grassland,
Great Basin scrub, Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub, Valley & foothill grassland
Elanus
leucurus
white-tailed
kite Birds ABNKC06010 184 4 None None G5 S3S4 null
BLM_S-Sensitive, CDFW_FPFully Protected, IUCN_LC-Least Concern
Cismontane woodland, Marsh & swamp, Riparian
woodland, Valley & foothill grassland, Wetland
Emys
marmorata
western
pond turtle Reptiles ARAAD02030 1404 7 None None G3G4 S3 null BLM_S-Sensitive, CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special Concern,
IUCN_VU-Vulnerable, USFS_SSensitive
Aquatic, Artificial flowing waters, Klamath/North coast flowing waters, Klamath/North coast standing waters,
Marsh & swamp, Sacramento/San Joaquin flowing waters,
Sacramento/San Joaquin standing waters, South coast
flowing waters, South coast standing waters, Wetland
Lanius
ludovicianus
loggerhead
shrike Birds ABPBR01030 110 1 None None G4 S4 null
CDFW_SSC-Species of Special
Concern, IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
Broadleaved upland forest, Desert wash, Joshua tree
woodland, Mojavean desert scrub, Pinon & juniper
woodlands, Riparian woodland, Sonoran desert scrub
381
8/26/22, 11:08 AM Print View
https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/rarefind/view/QuickElementListView.html 1/1 Query Summary:

Quad IS (Brentwood (3712186))
AND CA Rare Plant Rank IS (1A OR 1B OR 1B.1 OR 1B.2 OR 1B.3 OR 2A OR 2B OR 2B.1 OR 2B.2 OR 2B.3) Print Close
CNDDB Element Query Results
Scientific
Name
Common
Name
Taxonomic
Group
Element
Code
Total
Occs
Returned
Occs
Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
CA
Rare
Plant
Rank
Other
Status Habitats
Blepharizonia
plumosa big tarplant Dicots PDAST1C011 53 6 None None G1G2 S1S2 1B.1 SB_CalBG/RSABG-California/RanchoSanta Ana Botanic Garden Valley & foothill grassland Centromadia parryi
ssp. congdonii Congdon's tarplant Dicots PDAST4R0P1 98 1 None None G3T2 S2 1B.1 BLM_S-Sensitive, SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden
Valley & foothill grassland
Cicuta maculata
var. bolanderi
Bolander's waterhemlock Dicots PDAPI0M051 17 1 None None G5T4T5 S2? 2B.1 null Marsh & swamp, Salt marsh, Wetland
Extriplex
joaquinana
San Joaquin
spearscale Dicots PDCHE041F3 127 3 None None G2 S2 1B.2 BLM_S-Sensitive, SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden
Alkali playa, Chenopod
scrub, Meadow & seep,
Valley & foothill grassland
Hesperolinon
breweri
Brewer's western
flax Dicots PDLIN01030 29 1 None None G2 S2 1B.2 null
Chaparral, Cismontane
woodland, Ultramafic, Valley
& foothill grassland
Oenothera
deltoides ssp.
howellii
Antioch Dunes
evening-primrose Dicots PDONA0C0B4 10 1 Endangered Endangered G5T1 S1 1B.1 SB_CalBG/RSABG-California/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic Garden, SB_UCBG-UC
Botanical Garden at Berkeley
Interior dunes
Symphyotrichum
lentum
Suisun Marsh
aster Dicots PDASTE8470 175 1 None None G2 S2 1B.2
SB_CalBG/RSABG-California/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic Garden, SB_USDA-US
Dept of Agriculture
Brackish marsh, Freshwater
marsh, Marsh & swamp,
Wetland
Tropidocarpum
capparideum
caper-fruited
tropidocarpum Dicots PDBRA2R010 20 1 None None G1 S1 1B.1 SB_CalBG/RSABG-California/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic Garden, USFS_SSensitiveValley & foothill grassland 382
8/26/22, 11:09 AM Print View
https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/rarefind/view/QuickElementListView.html 1/1 Query Summary:

Quad IS (Brentwood (3712186))
AND Federal Listing Status IS (Endangered OR Threatened OR Proposed Endangered OR Proposed Threatened OR Candidate) OR State Listing Status IS (Endangered OR Threatened OR Candidate Endangered OR Candidate Threatened)
Print Close
CNDDB Element Query Results
Scientific
Name
Common
Name
Taxonomic
Group
Element
Code
Total
Occs
Returned
Occs
Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
CA
Rare
Plant
Rank
Other
Status Habitats
Agelaius
tricolor tricolored blackbird Birds ABPBXB0020 955 1 None Threatened G1G2 S1S2 null BLM_S-Sensitive, CDFW_SSC-Species of
Special Concern, IUCN_EN-Endangered,
NABCI_RWL-Red Watch List,
USFWS_BCC-Birds of Conservation
Concern
Freshwater marsh, Marsh &
swamp, Swamp, Wetland
Ambystoma
californiense
pop. 1
California tiger
salamander - central
California DPS
Amphibians AAAAA01181 1265 21 Threatened Threatened G2G3T3 S3 null CDFW_WL-Watch List, IUCN_VUVulnerable Cismontane woodland,
Meadow & seep, Riparian
woodland, Valley & foothill
grassland, Vernal pool,
Wetland
Branchinecta
lynchi
vernal pool fairy
shrimp Crustaceans ICBRA03030 796 3 Threatened None G3 S3 null IUCN_VU-Vulnerable Valley & foothill grassland,Vernal pool, Wetland Buteo
swainsoni Swainson's hawk Birds ABNKC19070 2548 11 None Threatened G5 S3 null BLM_S-Sensitive, IUCN_LC-LeastConcern Great Basin grassland,
Riparian forest, Riparian
woodland, Valley & foothill
grassland
Oenothera
deltoides ssp.
howellii
Antioch Dunes
evening-primrose Dicots PDONA0C0B4 10 1 Endangered Endangered G5T1 S1 1B.1 SB_CalBG/RSABG-California/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic Garden, SB_UCBG-UC
Botanical Garden at Berkeley
Interior dunes
Vulpes
macrotis
mutica
San Joaquin kit fox Mammals AMAJA03041 1020 3 Endangered Threatened G4T2 S2 null null Chenopod scrub, Valley & foothill grassland
383
Appendix D
Traffic Impact Analysis
384
Sellers Avenue Residential Development
Draft Traffic Impact Analysis
August 1, 2022
Oakley, CA
385
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
Page i
Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................4

1.1 STUDY PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................................................ 4

1.2 STUDY INTERSECTIONS ...................................................................................................................................................... 4

1.3 STUDY SCENARIOS ............................................................................................................................................................. 5

2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................8

2.1 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED ................................................................................................................................................. 8

2.2 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................ 8

2.3 LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS ..................................................................................................................................... 10

3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................... 12

3.1 EXISTING SETTING AND ROADWAY SYSTEM ................................................................................................................ 12

3.2 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES .................................................................................................................................. 12

3.3 EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES ......................................................................................................................................... 13

3.4 EXISTING TRANSIT FACILITIES ........................................................................................................................................ 14

3.5 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .................................................................................................................................... 17

3.6 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 17

4.0 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS .................................................................................... 20

4.1 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED .............................................................................................................................................. 20

4.2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION........................................................................................................................................... 22

4.3 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT ........................................................................................................ 24

4.4 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS ........................................... 29

5.0 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................... 32

5.1 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH ................................................................................................................................. 32

5.2 INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – BACKGROUND NO-PROJECT CONDITIONS ................................. 33

6.0 BACKGROUND PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS ........................................................................... 36

6.1 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – BACKGROUND PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS .................................. 36

7.0 ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................. 38

7.1 SITE ACCESS, CIRCULATION, AND MULTIMODAL IMPACTS ........................................................................................ 38

7.2 SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................................... 39 386
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
Page ii

7.3 PARKING ANALYSIS......................................................................................................................................................... 39

7.4 QUEUEING ANALYSIS...................................................................................................................................................... 40 Tables
Table 1: Level of Service Thresholds Based on Intersection Control Delay ................................................................... 9 Table 2: Existing Transit Facilities ................................................................................................................................................ 15 Table 3: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing Conditions ........................................................................... 17 Table 4: Project Vehicle Trip Generation .................................................................................................................................. 23 Table 5: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing plus Project Conditions .................................................. 29 Table 6: Intersection Level of Service – Background Conditions .................................................................................... 33 Table 7: Intersection Traffic Level of Service – Background plus Project Conditions ............................................. 36 Table 8: Queueing for Study Intersections, in Feet .............................................................................................................. 40 Table 9: Queueing for Study Intersections, in Feet .............................................................................................................. 41 Figures
Figure 1: Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 2: Project Site Plan ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Figure 3: Transit Service Map ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 Figure 4: Existing Lane Patterns and Traffic Control ............................................................................................................ 18 Figure 5: Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ......................................................................................................................... 19 Figure 6: Traffic Analysis Zones in Project Study Area ........................................................................................................ 21 Figure 7a: Trip Distribution & Assignment .............................................................................................................................. 25 Figure 7b: Trip Distribution & Assignment ............................................................................................................................. 26 Figure 8a: Trip Distribution with Laurel Road Extension .................................................................................................... 27 Figure 8b: Background Lane Patterns and Traffic Control with Laurel Road Extension ........................................ 28 Figure 9: Existing plus Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................... 31 Figure 10: Redistribution of Existing Trips for Background Conditions ....................................................................... 34 Figure 11: Background Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...................................................................................... 35 Figure 12: Background plus Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .................................................................................... 37 387
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
Page iii
Appendices
Appendix A – Existing Conditions LOS Reports
Appendix B – Existing plus Project Conditions LOS Reports Appendix C – Existing plus Project Conditions Mitigated LOS Reports Appendix D – Background Conditions LOS Reports
Appendix E – Background plus Project Conditions LOS Reports Appendix F – Background plus Project Conditions Mitigated LOS Reports

388
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report describes results of the Transportation Impact Assessment (TIA) for a proposed Sellers Road residential development in the City of Oakley in Contra Costa County. The project site is located in east Oakley, on the southwest corner of the future intersection at Sellers Road and E. Laurel Road. The proposed residential development includes 85 single-family residential lots. The entire development is within the City of Oakley. Direct access to and from the site is proposed via two proposed driveways on Sellers Road. There are no existing sidewalks on Sellers Road in the vicinity of the project area.

This chapter discusses the TIS Purpose, project study area, and analysis scenarios. Figure 1 shows the study area and project site location. Figure 2 shows the project site plan, dated November 2021.

1.1 STUDY PURPOSE
The purpose of the TIA is to evaluate potential transportation impacts that could result from the proposed project, identify short-term and long-term multi-modal circulation needs where relevant to site access and/or project impacts, identify potential mitigation measures for any significant transportation impacts, and evaluate the adequacy of the proposed site plan for accommodating multi-modal site access and meeting City of Oakley Guidelines.

1.2 STUDY INTERSECTIONS
TJKM evaluated transportation conditions at three existing study intersections, and one proposed new driveway which would provide access to the project site. All intersections were evaluated based on conditions provided from recent traffic counts conducted for the a.m. (7:00 a.m.-9:00 a.m.) and p.m. (4:00 p.m.-6:00 p.m.) peak periods for a typical weekday. The following study intersections were selected in consultation with City staff based on the anticipated trip generation and travel pattern for project trips:

1. E. Cypress Road / Sellers Avenue

2. Sellers Avenue / Future E. Laurel Road*

3. Sellers Avenue / Delta Road

4. Sellers Avenue / Project Access 1**

5. Sellers Avenue / Project Access 2**

6. Main Street / E. Laurel Road

7. Main Street / Delta Road
*Indicates intersection would be evaluated under Background scenarios only **Indicates intersection would be evaluated under “plus Project” scenarios only

389
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis

1.3 STUDY SCENARIOS
The roadway operations analysis addresses the following six traffic scenarios:
 Existing Conditions – This scenario describes existing transportation conditions in the study area based on the current roadway and sidewalk network characteristics, transit service, and the existing Oakley Citywide Traffic Model.
 Existing plus Project Conditions – This scenario is similar to Existing Conditions but with the additions of net new trips that would be generated by the project.  Background Conditions –This scenario describes the projected peak hour traffic operations based on the net change to travel patterns anticipated from approved (but not yet constructed) or fully/partially occupied developments in the City at the time of the Existing Conditions assessment. This includes additional trips that would be generated if the proposed approved developments were to operate at full occupancy. The conditions in this scenario were developed using the Updated Citywide Vistro Model.
 Background plus Project Conditions – This scenario is similar to Background Conditions but with the inclusion of vehicle trips that would be generated by the project. The Background plus Project Conditions analysis provides an assessment of project impacts that takes into account other projects that would be completed within a similar timeframe as the project. 390
Mailcoat Ave
Main St
E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Delta Rd Delta Rd
W Cypress Rd
Sellers Ave Sellers Ave
Knightsen Ave
Broadway St
Emerson Ranch Wy
Franklin L
n
Machado Ln
Jersey Island Rd
Picasso Dr
Frank Hengel Wy
Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Simoni Ranch Rd
W Bolton Rd
Brownstone Rd
Hill Ave
Study Intersection Project Entrance Project Site
3 1
x
2 4
5 6
7 N
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
270-044
LEGEND
391
TJKM
N
Figure 2: Site Plan
270-044
392
TJKM
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis

2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY

2.1 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED
The City of Oakley has not yet established standards of significance for vehicle miles traveled which is now a mandatory CEQA component of traffic studies. The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Technical Advisory (December 2018) provides guidance to analysts and local jurisdictions for implementing VMT as a metric for determining the transportation impact for land use projects. The OPR guidelines state that for analysis purposes, “VMT” refers to automobile VMT, specifically passenger vehicles and light trucks. Heavy truck traffic is typically excluded. This study evaluates project-related VMT as outlined in the adopted CCTA VMT methodology. The methodology and implementation guidelines were adopted by CCTA in July 2020.

The CCTA guidelines include a screening process that describes five scenarios in which a project would be exempted from a VMT analysis requirement: 1) projects exempt from CEQA analysis, 2) small projects, 3) local serving projects, 4) projects in transit priority areas, and 5) projects in low VMT areas. It should be noted that even if a project satisfies one or more of the screening criteria, lead agencies may still require a VMT analysis if there is evidence that the project has characteristics that might lead to a significant amount of VMT. The project does not satisfy the requirements for screening criteria 1-4.

Under the CCTA VMT methodology, a low VMT area is defined as a city or unincorporated portion within one of the CCTA subregions where home-based VMT per resident is at least 15 percent below the countywide or where the commute VMT per employee is at least 15 percent below the regional average.

A conservative reading of the methodology would indicate that when the citywide average VMT per resident is above the countywide average, projects cannot be screened out based on location, and a VMT analysis must be completed. In such cases, the appropriate significance thresholds based on countywide or regional average would be applied. The methodology also permits the applicable average VMT for the subject municipality or unincorporated CCTA subregion to be utilized instead of the countywide or regional average, if it is less stringent.

Under CCTA guidelines, a residential project would have a significant impact on VMT if it would generate residential VMT per capita higher than 85 percent of the City of Oakley average.

2.2 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative measure that describes operational conditions as they relate to the traffic stream and perceptions by motorists and passengers. LOS generally describes these conditions in terms of speed and travel time, delays, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, and safety. The operational LOS are given letter designations from A to F, with A representing the best operating conditions (free-flow with little or no delay) and F representing the worst conditions (severely congested flow with high delays). Intersections are generally the capacity-controlling locations, with respect to traffic operations, on arterial and collector streets. 393
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis

Signalized Intersections
The study intersections under traffic signal control were analyzed using Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM 6) Operations Methodology for Signalized Intersections (Transportation Research Board, 2016), as described in Chapter 19. This methodology determines LOS based on overall average control delay per vehicle for the intersection during peak hour operating conditions. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The average control delay for signalized intersections was calculated using Vistro analysis software version 7.00-05 and correlated to a LOS designation. Table 1 presents the HCM 6 delay and LOS definitions.

Unsignalized Intersections
Stop-control study intersections were analyzed using HCM 6 Operations Methodology for Unsignalized Intersections, as described in Chapters 20 and 21. LOS ratings for stop-control intersections are based on average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle. At the side street of one-way stop-controlled intersections or two-way stop sign intersections, the control delay is calculated for each movement, not for the intersection as a whole. For approaches composed of a single lane, the control delay is computed as the average of all movements in that lane. The weighted average delay for the entire intersections is presented for all-way stop-controlled (AWSC) intersections, while the worst-movement delay is presented for side-street stop-controlled intersections. The average control delay for unsignalized intersections was calculated using Vistro analysis software version (7.00-04) and correlated to a LOS designation. At an unsignalized intersection, most of the major street traffic is not delayed, and by definition has acceptable conditions. The major street left-turn movements and minor street movements are all susceptible to delay of varying degrees. Generally, higher major street traffic volumes are associated with higher delay for minor movements. HCM 6 definitions for delay and LOS at signalized intersections are presented in Table

1. The analysis methodology described above was used to measure a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic operations for all study intersections.

Table 1 describes the LOS thresholds from the HCM 6th edition for intersections. The intersection LOS thresholds differ between signalized and unsignalized intersections.

Table 1: Level of Service Thresholds Based on Intersection Control Delay Level of
Service Description
Signalized
Intersection
Delay (D)
(sec)
Unsignalized
Intersection
Delay (D)
(sec)
A
Very low control delay, up to 10 seconds per vehicle.

Progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Many vehicles do not stop at all.

Short cycle lengths may tend to contribute to low delay values.
0 ≤ D ≤ 10 0 ≤ D ≤ 10
B
Control delay greater than 10 and up to 20 seconds per
vehicle. There is good progression or short cycle lengths or both. More vehicles stop causing higher levels of delay. 10 < D ≤ 20 10 < D ≤ 15
394
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis

C
Control delay greater than 20 and up to 35 seconds per
vehicle. Fair progression or longer cycle lengths, or both cause higher delays. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear. Cycle failure occurs when a given green phase does not serve queued vehicles and overflow occurs. The
number of vehicles stopping is significant, though many still pass through the intersection without stopping.
20 < D ≤ 35 15 < D ≤ 25
D
Control delay greater than 35 and up to 55 seconds per
vehicle. The influence of congestions becomes more
noticeable. Longer delays may result from some
combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle
lengths, or high volumes. Many vehicles stop, the
proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable.
35 < D ≤ 55 25 < D ≤ 35
E
Control delay greater than 55 and up to 80 seconds per
vehicle. The limit of acceptable delay. High delays usually indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high volumes. Individual cycle failures are frequent.
55 < D ≤ 80 35 < D ≤ 50
F
Control delay in excess of 80 seconds per vehicle.

Unacceptable to most drivers. Oversaturation, arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. Many
individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be contributing factors to higher delay. 80 < D 50 < D
Source: HCM 6th Edition

2.3 LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
Although level of service is no longer used for identifying impacts under CEQA, level of service analysis is still used for determining consistency with adopted agency plans and standards. Where standards refer to significant environmental impacts, this analysis instead identifies these as significant inconsistencies with adopted plans. In most cases, in this report LOS exceedances are characterized as substantial.

Per the City of Oakley General Plan, LOS D or a volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio of 0.90 are the thresholds of acceptability for signalized intersections. Any signalized intersection operating worse than LOS D would be considered inconsistent with this standard. The intersection of Main Street and E. Cypress Road, which is a CMP intersection (Contra Costa County 2019 Congestion Management Program, CCTA, 2019), and the intersections along Main Street at Laurel Road and Delta Road, which are within Priority Development Areas (Plan Bay Area 2040, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2017), have standards of LOS E or better. For this study, the study intersections were analyzed using HCM 6th Edition Methodology as per the City’s guidance. Average control delay is reported in seconds per vehicle for signalized and all-waystop-control intersections and critical delay for minor approaches is reported for two-way-stop-control intersections. Intersections operating worse than LOS D are considered inconsistent with the City’s standard.
395
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis

Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines includes criteria for potential transportation impacts. Although no longer applicable for CEQA, they are still relevant issues for consideration by Oakley. These include whether a project would result in one of the following:
 Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, bicycle and pedestrian paths, and mass transit.
 Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to LOS standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways.
 Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks.
 Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment).  Result in inadequate emergency access.
 Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities.  Section 4B of the Contra Costa County Transportation Analysis Guidelines identifies significance criteria based on level of service analysis results. Significant impacts occur if:
 The addition of project traffic results in the degradation of intersection operations from acceptable LOS D or better to unacceptable operations (LOS E or LOS F), except for intersections in Priority Development Areas (“PDA”) where the minimum acceptable operational standard is LOS E. This document refers to these exceedances as “substantial”.  The addition of project traffic to an intersection operating unacceptably before the addition of project trips results in an increase in average controlled delay (for signalized and all-way stopcontrolled intersections) or worst movement/approach delay (for side-street stop-controlled intersections) at the intersection by 5.0 seconds or more.

396
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis

3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
This section describes existing conditions in the immediate project site vicinity, including roadway facilities, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and available transit service. In addition, existing traffic volumes and operations are presented for the study intersections, including the results of LOS calculations.

3.1 EXISTING SETTING AND ROADWAY SYSTEM
Relevant roadways in the project vicinity are discussed below and shown in Figure 1.

E. Cypress Road – E. Cypress Road is a two to four lane major arterial roadway. E. Cypress Road extends east-west between Main Street and Sandmound Boulevard. Residential, school, and agricultural uses, along with vacant land, characterize the lands along both sides of E. Cypress Road. Posted speed limits on E. Cypress Road are 35 miles per hour (mph) between Main Street and Frank Hengel Way and east of Summer Lake Drive, 45 mph between Frank Hengel Way and Sellers Avenue and between Bethel Island Road and Summer Lake Drive, and 50 mph between Sellers Avenue and Bethel Island Road.

Sellers Avenue – Sellers Avenue is a two lane, north-south collector roadway north of E. Cypress Road, and minor arterial south of E. Cypress Road. Residential and agricultural uses characterize the lands along both sides of Sellers Avenue. The maximum posted speed limit on Sellers Avenue is 50 mph between E.

Cypress Road and Delta Road.

Laurel Road – Laurel Road is a two- to four-lane, east-west divided roadway. Currently, Laurel Road extends to Teton Road in the east and terminates at SR 4 to the west. Laurel Road mainly serves to collect and distribute traffic to/from residential streets and SR 4. In the future Laurel Road will extend to Sellers Avenue in the east and will be widened to four lanes for the portion east of Main Street. The posted speed limit on Laurel Road ranges between 35 to 40 mph near the project site.

Main Street – Main Street is a two to four lane major arterial roadway. Main Street is currently the major north-south transportation corridor in the City of Oakley. Mixed residential, commercial, and agricultural uses characterize the lands along both sides of Main Street between Rose Avenue and Laurel Avenue.

Maximum speeds posted on Main Street are 35 mph west of Rose Avenue, 45 mph between Rose Avenue and Bernard Road, and 40 mph south of Bernard Road.

Delta Road – Delta Road is a two-lane, east-west rural road that extends east from Main Street providing connection to the north end of the planned Byron Highway. Delta Road mainly provides access to residential and agricultural land uses. The posted speed limit on Delta Road is 40 mph.

3.2 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
Walkability is defined as the ability to travel easily and safely between various origins and destinations without having to rely on automobiles or other motorized travel. The ideal “walkable” community includes wide sidewalks, a mix of land uses providing residential, employment, and shopping opportunities, minimal conflict points with vehicle traffic, and access to transit facilities and services.

Pedestrian facilities are comprised of crosswalks, sidewalks, pedestrian signals, and off-street paths, which provide safe and convenient routes for pedestrians to access destinations such as institutions, businesses, public transportation, and recreation facilities.
397
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis

There are no existing sidewalks provided along the project frontage. The closest sidewalk network is located on the north side of E. Cypress Road at the intersection of E. Cypress Road and Sellers Avenue; on both sides of Main Street, south of Laurel Road; and on the south side of Laurel Road, east and west of Main Street.

3.3 EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES
Bicycle facilities include the following:

Multi-Use Paths (Class I) – A path physically separated from motor vehicle traffic by an open space or barrier, and either within a highway or an independent right-of-way (ROW), used by bicyclists, pedestrians, joggers, skaters, and other non-motorized travelers. Class I paths are the most popular type of facility. Because the availability of uninterrupted ROW is limited, this type of facility may be difficult to locate and expensive to build, relative to other types of bicycle facilities, but inexpensive compared to new roadways. Ideal locations for bike paths are areas such as powerline easements, utility easements, canal banks, river levees, drainage easements, railroad or highway ROW, or regional community parks.

Bike Lanes (Class II) – A portion of a roadway designated by striping and pavement markings for the preferential or exclusive use of bicyclists. Bike lanes are intended to promote an orderly flow of bicycle and vehicle traffic. This type of facility is established by using the appropriate striping, pavement legends, and signs.

Bike Routes (Class III) – Bike routes are shared facilities between bicycle and motor vehicle traffic.

They provide for specific bicycle demand and may be used to connect discontinuous segments of bike lanes. In addition, bike routes are located on residential streets and rural roads. If the pavement width is sufficient, and traffic volume/speeds warrant, an edge line may be painted to further delineate the bike route. Bike routes are signed with the G-93 Bike Route marker but no striping or legends are required.

The City of Oakley General Plan (September 2002), City of Oakley Parks, Recreation, and Trails Master Plan 2020 (Summer 2007), and the Contra Costa County Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (October 2009) propose that several new bicycle facilities be constructed in the future which includes trunk line bikeway network passing through Main Street and Laurel Road and a local multi-use trail on E. Cypress Road and Sellers Avenue in the vicinity of the project area.

The existing bicycle facilities are at the following locations:
 East Cypress Road – Class II bicycle facilities are provided on the north side between Knightsen Avenue and Main Street, and on the south side between Main Street and 790 feet east of Frank Hengel Way.
 Main Street- Class II bicycle facilities are provided between Cypress Road and Simoni Ranch Road on both sides.
 Sellers Avenue – Class II bicycle facilities are provided north of E. Cypress Road.  Laurel Road- Class II bicycle facilities are provided between Harvest Drive and Main Street on both sides.
 Marsh Creek Regional Trail- Class I bicycle facility provided along Marsh Creek which can be accessed through Delta road approximately 1.5 miles west of the project site. 398
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis

 Via Delta de Anza Trail- Class I bicycle facility provided along Contra Costa Canal which can be accessed through Cypress Road and O’ Hara Avenue approximately two miles west of the project site.

3.4 EXISTING TRANSIT FACILITIES
Tri-Delta Transit provides transit services in the City of Oakley, with three lines connecting Brentwood and the Pittsburg/Bay Point Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station. Due to COVID-19 conditions, some of the routes and schedules may not currently be in full operation.  Route 300, the Pittsburg BART/Brentwood Park & Ride route, is a weekday express route connecting Brentwood to the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART station via Oakley and Antioch. This bus travels along Main Street, operating from 4:15 a.m. to approximately 10:00 p.m. with 15 to 30- minute headways.
 Route 383, the Oakley/Antioch/Freedom High School route, connects Oakley to Antioch and Freedom High School in Oakley. This route, in both clockwise and counterclockwise directions, provides only weekday service. The counterclockwise route runs with approximate one-hour headways, and the clockwise route runs twice during the a.m. peak hour period only.  Route 391, the BART/Pittsburg/Antioch/Oakley/Brentwood route, provides weekday service to most East County Cities. The route operates from 4:00 a.m. to 1:15 a.m. with 30 to 60-minute headways.
 Route 393, the BART/Pittsburg/Antioch/Oakley/Brentwood route, provides weekend service to Route 391. The route operates from 5:20 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. with approximately 60-minute headways.

Routes 391 and 393 operate via bus stops located at the study intersections of Main Street and Laurel Road, and Main Street and Delta Road. Table 2 summarizes the services and frequency during the weekday and on weekends for transit in the City of Oakley. Figure 3 shows a map of transit routes operated by Tri-Delta Transit.
399
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis

Table 2: Existing Transit Facilities
Route From To
Weekdays Saturday Sunday
Hours Headway
(min) Hours Headway (min) Hours Headway (min)
300
Pittsburg/
Bay Point
BART
Station
Brentwood
Park &
Ride
4:15 a.m. –
10:00 p.m. 10-30 …. …. …. ….
383
Antioch
Park &
Ride
Antioch
Park &
Ride 1
6:52 a.m. –
5:26 p.m. 60-120 …. …. …. ….
391
Pittsburg/
Bay Point
BART
Station
Brentwood
Park &
Ride
4:03 a.m. -
1:14 a.m. 30-60 …. …. …. ….
393
Pacifica &
Mariners
Cove
Brentwood
Park &
Ride
…. …. 5:22 a.m. –
1:39 a.m. 60 6:24 a.m. – 1:49 a.m. 60
Source: www.trideltatransit.com

400
Figure 3: Transit Service Map
270-044
N
401
TJKM
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis

3.5 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
The Existing Conditions turning movement volumes for vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians at all study intersections reflect those of the most recently approved City of Oakley Citywide Model for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Since the City of Oakley is currently in the process of updating the model, the analysis may be updated with current counts at all intersections. Existing lane patterns and traffic control are illustrated in Figure 4. Existing turning movement volumes at each existing study intersection are illustrated in Figure 5.

3.6 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – EXISTING CONDITIONS Under Existing Conditions, intersections were analyzed based on lane geometries and traffic controls provided by the Existing Conditions scenario of the Citywide Traffic Model and observed in the field.

Table 3 summarizes peak hour levels of service at the study intersections under Existing Conditions.

Detailed LOS worksheets for this scenario are provided in Appendix A. Under Existing Conditions, all study intersections operate within acceptable jurisdictional standards of LOS D/E or better during both peak hours, except the intersection at Main Street/Delta Road (Intersection #7), which operate at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour.

Table 3: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing Conditions Notes: Bold text indicates unacceptable intersection operations. *Indicates Routes of Regional Significance (East County Action Plan, CCTA, 2019). **Analyzed under plus Project Scenarios, only.
***Analyzed under Background Scenarios, only.
1 Indicates intersection is located in Priority Development Area and has standard of LOS E (Plan Bay Area 2050). 2 AWSC – All-way stop control; TWSC – Two-way stop control. 3 A.M. – Morning peak hour; P.M. – Evening peak hour.
4 Delay: Average control delay in seconds per vehicle, reported values are overall for signalized and all-way-stop-control intersections; and critical minor approaches for one- and two-way stop-control intersections. 5 LOS: Level of Service.

ID Intersection Control2 Peak
Hour3
Existing Conditions
Average
Delay4 LOS5
1 Sellers Road / E. Cypress Road* Signalized A.M. 18.4 B P.M. 17.2 B
2 Sellers Road / Laurel Road*** Signalized A.M. - -
P.M. - -
3 Sellers Road / Delta Road AWSC A.M. 9.4 A
P.M. 13.0 B
4 Sellers Road / Project Access 1** One-Way Stop A.M. - - P.M. - -
5 Seller Road / Project Access 2** One-Way Stop
A.M. - -
P.M. - -
6 Main Street / Laurel Road*1 Signalized A.M. 40.7 D
P.M. 32.8 C
7 Main Street / Delta Road*1 TWSC A.M. 70.2 F
P.M. 40.5 E
402
Traffic Signal
Intersection #1
Sellers Rd/E Cypress Rd
Intersection #3
Sellers Rd / Delta Rd
Intersection #6
Main St / Laurel Rd
Intersection #7
Main St / Delta Rd
Laurel Rd Neroly Rd
Main St
Delta Rd
Sellers Ave
Delta Rd
Main St
E Cypress Rd
Sellers Ave
Figure 4: Existing Lane Patterns and Traffic Control
270-044
LEGEND
Stop Sign TJKM
403
Intersection #1
Sellers Rd/E Cypress Rd
Intersection #3
Sellers Rd / Delta Rd
Intersection #6
Main St / Laurel Rd
Intersection #7
Main St / Delta Rd
Laurel Rd
Main St
Delta Rd
Sellers Ave
Delta Rd
Main St
E Cypress Rd
Sellers Ave
96 (86)
5 (2)
47 (106)
107 (136)
348 (370)
91(94)
33 (88)
86 (203)
36 (51)
348 (562)
66 (98)
5 (22)142 (149)3 (13)
569 (445)151 (112)
8 (10)2 (0)1 (3)
164 (129)465 (326)61 (95)
190 (134)
51(48)
1(0)
501 (283)
95 (68)
104 (57)
162 (95)
176 (58)
3 (21)
63 (85)
38 (43)
11 (1)
289 (379)
177 (96)
176 (165)
56 (162)
101(123)
13 (34)
63 (113)
41(52)
Figure 5: Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
270-044
TJKM
XX AM Peak Hour Traffic Volume
LEGEND
(XX) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume
404
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis

4.0 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS

4.1 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED
TJKM conducted Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) analysis for the project in compliance with Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) via the Contra Costa Transportation Authority’s (CCTA) recommended VMT analysis methodology. The CCTA VMT analysis methodology provides different screening criteria and significance thresholds based on the project land use type. CCTA considers residential projects to have a significant impact on VMT if the project generated home-based VMT per resident is higher than the less stringent of the following:
 85% of the home-based VMT per resident in the municipality or  85% of the existing County-wide average home-based VMT per resident.

TJKM conducted a VMT (Vehicle Miles Traveled) analysis for the proposed housing project located at the intersection of E. Laurel Road and Sellers Road Lane in Oakley, CA. The project proposes build 85 single family units in a residential subdivision.

The VMT Analysis was performed for this project in the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) Model. The Travel Analysis Zone (TAZ) for this project in the model is #30267. The 85 single family dwelling units were added into the TAZ for the base year to see if the project creates significant VMT impacts.

As this project is not screened out from VMT analysis, two full model runs were performed for this project in accordance to CCTA VMT methodology. The first one is a base year 2020 run to analyze existing VMT per capita numbers for the City of Oakley. The second run is a base year plus project 2020 run with the housing units added in to see if its impact on VMT is significant.

From the 2020 Base Year run, the home based VMT per capita for the City of Oakley is 26.76. For a project to not be significant, the 85% threshold is set at 0.85 x 26.76 which is 22.75. This value is the less stringent home-based VMT per capita number as mentioned in the CCTA VMT methodology guidelines.

The 2020 Base Year plus Project model run added 85 Single Family Dwelling Units into TAZ #30267. The resultant home based VMT per capita for the project TAZ is 23.39. Since this value is higher than the threshold, some mitigation is required for this project to have an insignificant impact on VMT.

A mitigation measure that this project may attempt is:

1. Improve the pedestrian network – this strategy focuses on creating a pedestrian network within the project and connecting to nearby destinations. Sidewalk improvements count as part of this strategy and the maximum VMT reduction allowed is 5.7%.

A 5.7% reduction in VMT for the project reduces the value from 23.39 to 22.06. With mitigation, the Sellers Ave residential project is found to have a less than significant impact on VMT for the base year.

Figure 6 illustrates the traffic analysis zones surrounding the proposed project. 405
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
21 Figure 6: Traffic Analysis Zones in Project Study Area 30267
30269 30268
30266
30263
406
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
22 4.2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
The project vehicle trip generation rates were obtained from the reference Trip Generation, 11h Edition (2021), published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Based on the applicable rates for Single-Family Detached Housing (ITE Code 210), the Project is forecasted to generate 802 daily vehicle trips, including 60 (16 inbound, 44 outbound) a.m. peak hour and 80 (50 inbound, 30 outbound) p.m. peak hour vehicle trips. Table 4 summarizes the trip generation calculation for the proposed single-family home development.
407
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
23 Table 4: Project Vehicle Trip Generation
Land Use (ITE Code) Size1 Daily A.M. Peak2 P.M. Peak2 Rate Trips Rate In:Out In Out Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Proposed Single-Family Detached Housing (210) 85 DU 9.43 802 0.70 26:74 16 44 60 0.94 63:37 50 30 80 Net New Trips 802 16 44 60 50 30 80
Notes: Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, 2021. 1DU – Dwelling Units 2A.M. Peak – morning peak period (7:00 a.m.-9:00 a.m.); P.M. Peak – evening peak period (4:00p.m.-6:00 p.m.) 408
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
24 4.3 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
The peak-hour vehicle trips generated by the project were manually assigned to each study intersection based on two origin and destination trip-distribution assumptions for Existing and Background scenarios.

The trip distribution assumptions under Existing plus Project Conditions follow:
 19 percent to/from Main Street North
 63 percent to/from Laurel Road west of Main Street
 15 percent to/from Main Street South
 2 percent to/from Sellers Road South
 1 percent to/from E. Cypress Road East
Figures 7a and 7b illustrate the distribution of project trips to origins/destinations, and the assignment of project trips to study intersections based on the anticipated path(s) of travel under Existing plus Project Conditions.

The trip distribution assumptions under Background plus Project Conditions follow:
 19 percent to/from Main Street North
 53 percent to/from Laurel Road west of Main Street
 15 percent to/from Main Street South
 2 percent to/from Sellers Road South
 1 percent to/from E. Cypress Road East
Figures 8a and 8b illustrate the distribution of project trips to origins/destinations, and the assignment of project trips to study intersections based on the anticipated path(s) of travel under Bakcground plus Project Conditions.
409
Mailcoat Ave
Main St
E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Delta Rd Delta Rd
W Cypress Rd
Sellers Ave Sellers Ave
Knightsen Ave
Broadway St
Emerson Ranch Wy
Franklin L
n
Machado Ln
Jersey Island Rd
Picasso Dr
Frank Hengel Wy
Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Simoni Ranch Rd
W Bolton Rd
Brownstone Rd
Hill Ave
Study Intersection Project Entrance Project Site XX% Trip Distribution 19%
63%
15%
1%
1% 1%
3 1
x
2 4
5 6
7 N
Figure 7a: Existing Conditions Trip Distribution
270-044
LEGEND
410
TJKM
Intersection #7
Main St / Delta Rd
Intersection #1
Sellers Rd / E Cypress Rd
Intersection #2
Sellers Rd / Laurel Rd
Intersection #3
Sellers Rd / Delta Rd
Intersection #4
Sellers Rd / Project Access #1
Intersection #5
Sellers Rd / Project Access #2
Intersection #6
Main St / Laurel Rd
Laurel Rd
Main St
Delta Rd
Sellers Rd
Delta Rd
Main St
28 (19)
13 (42)
10 (32)
0 (1)
1 (0)
E Cypress Rd
Sellers Rd
Sellers Rd
Future Laurel Rd
13 (42)
36 (26)
Sellers Rd
Project Access #1
Sellers Rd
Project Access #2
36 (25)
3 (7)
7 (4)
1 (0)
6 (21)
7 (21)
4 (2)
18 (13)
2 (3)
18 (13)
7 (21)
4 (2)
4 (2)
18 (13)
2 (4)2 (3)
3 (7)
7 (4)
Figure 7b: Existing Conditions Trip Distribution & Assignment 270-044
TJKM
XX AM Peak Hour Project Volume
LEGEND
(XX) PM Peak Hour Project Volume
411
Mailcoat Ave
Main St
E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Delta Rd Delta Rd
W Cypress Rd
Sellers Ave Sellers Ave
Knightsen Ave
Broadway St
Emerson Ranch Wy
Franklin Ln
Machado Ln
Jersey Island Rd
Picasso Dr
Frank Hengel Wy
Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Simoni Ranch Rd
W Bolton Rd
Brownstone Rd
Hill Ave
Study Intersection Project Entrance Project Site XX% Trip Distribution 19%
53%
15%
1%
1% 1%
10%
3 1
x
2 4
5 6
7 N
Figure 8a: Background Conditions Trip Distribution
270-044
LEGEND
412
TJKM
Mailcoat Ave
Main St
E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Delta Rd Delta Rd
W Cypress Rd
Sellers Ave Sellers Ave
Knightsen Ave
Broadway St
Emerson Ranch Wy
Franklin Ln
Machado Ln
Jersey Island Rd
Picasso Dr
Frank Hengel Wy
Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Simoni Ranch Rd
W Bolton Rd
Brownstone Rd
Hill Ave
Intersection #7
Main St / Delta Rd
Intersection #1
Sellers Rd / E Cypress Rd
Intersection #2
Sellers Rd / Laurel Rd
Intersection #3
Sellers Rd / Delta Rd
Intersection #4
Sellers Rd / Project Access #1
Intersection #5
Sellers Rd / Project Access #2
Intersection #6
Main St / Laurel Rd
Laurel Rd
Main St
Delta Rd
Sellers Rd
Delta Rd
Main St
5 (14)
8 (27)
1 (0)
1 (1)
E Cypress Rd
Sellers Rd
Sellers Rd
Future Laurel Rd
5 (15)
Sellers Rd
Project Access #1
Sellers Rd
Project Access #2
12 (9)
7 (4)
1 (1)
7 (25)
8 (24)
4 (3)
18 (13)
18 (12)
8 (24)
4 (3)
4 (2)
18 (12)
1 (1)
2 (7)
7 (4)
23 (16)
13 (9)
10 (34)
2 (7)
23 (16)
19%
53%
15%
1%
1% 1%
10%
3 1
2 4
5 6
7 Figure 8b: Background Conditions Trip Distribution & Assignment 270-044
TJKM
XX AM Peak Hour Project Volume
LEGEND
(XX) PM Peak Hour Project Volume
413
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
29 4.4 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS Figure 9 shows the peak hour volumes at each intersection under Existing plus Project Conditions. Table 5 summarizes peak hour levels of service at the study intersections under Existing plus Project Conditions, based on the addition of project trips to each study intersection. Detailed LOS worksheets for this scenario are provided in Appendix B. As shown, all study intersections will continue to operate at acceptable LOS under Existing plus Project conditions, except the intersection at Main Street/Delta Road (Intersection #7), which operates at LOS F during the a.m. peak.

Table 5: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing plus Project Conditions Notes: Bold text indicates unacceptable intersection operations. *Indicates Routes of Regional Significance (East County Action Plan, CCTA, 2019). **Analyzed under plus Project Scenarios, only.
***Analyzed under Background Scenarios, only.
1 Indicates intersection is located in Priority Development Area and has standard of LOS E (Plan Bay Area 2050). 2 AWSC – All-way stop control; TWSC – Two-way stop control. 3 A.M. – Morning peak hour; P.M. – Evening peak hour.
4 Delay: Average control delay in seconds per vehicle, reported values are overall for signalized and all-way-stop-control intersections; and critical minor approaches for one- and two-way stop-control intersections. 5 LOS: Level of Service.

Traffic Impact Findings
The project impact to the intersection at Main Street/E. Cypress Delta Road (Intersection #7) is potentially substantial because the project adds five or more seconds of delay in the a.m. peak period.

The stop-controlled intersection of Main Street/Delta Road (Study Intersection #7) operates at unacceptable LOS F during the a.m. peak hour under Existing Conditions without and with the proposed project. During the a.m. peak hour, the addition of project traffic increases delay by over five seconds, and thus a potential substantial impact, due to lack of acceptable gaps to the westbound left-turn movement, is observed. TJKM performed a peak hour signal warrant analysis, based on the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) standards, at the intersection for existing peak hour traffic ID Intersection Control2 Peak
Hour3
Existing Conditions Existing plus Project
Conditions Substantial
Impact?
(Y/N) Average
Delay4 LOS5 Average Delay4 LOS5
1 Sellers Road / E. Cypress
Road* Signalized A.M. 18.4 B 19.8 B N
P.M. 17.2 B 18.5 B N
2 Sellers Road / Laurel Road*** Signalized A.M. - - N
P.M. - - N
3 Sellers Road / Delta Road AWSC
A.M. 9.4 A 9.5 A N
P.M. 13.0 B 13.2 B N
4 Sellers Road / Project Access
1**
One-Way
Stop
A.M. - - 11.3 B N
P.M. - - 10.9 B N
5 Seller Road / Project Access
2**
One-Way
Stop
A.M. - - 11.2 B N
P.M. - - 10.7 B N
6 Main Street / Laurel Road*1 Signalized A.M. 40.7 D 40.5 D N P.M. 32.8 C 32.1 C N
7 Main Street / Delta Road*1 TWSC A.M. 70.2 F 113.5 F Y P.M. 40.5 E 44.5 E N
414
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
30 volumes. A signal is warranted in the a.m. and p.m. peak hour, based on the peak hour signal warrant (Warrant #3). Installing a signal control at this intersection improves intersection operations to LOS C or better during both a.m. and p.m. peak hours.

Appendix C contains detailed LOS worksheets for mitigations under Existing plus Project Conditions and the peak hour signal warrant worksheets.

415
Mailcoat Ave
Main St
E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Delta Rd Delta Rd
W Cypress Rd
Sellers Ave Sellers Ave
Knightsen Ave
Broadway St
Emerson Ranch Wy
Franklin Ln
Machado Ln
Jersey Island Rd
Picasso Dr
Frank Hengel Wy
Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Simoni Ranch Rd
W Bolton Rd
Brownstone Rd
Hill Ave
Intersection #1
Sellers Rd / E Cypress Rd
Intersection #3
Sellers Rd / Delta Rd
Intersection #4
Sellers Rd / Project Access #1
Intersection #5
Sellers Rd / Project Access #2
Intersection #6
Main St / Laurel Rd
Intersection #7
Main St / Delta Rd
E Cypress Rd
Sellers Rd
Sellers Rd
Project Access #1
Sellers Rd
Project Access #2
6 (21)
281 (185)
4 (2)
18 (13)
2 (3)
166 (207)
7 (21)
278 (166)
4 (2)
18 (13)
2 (4)
150 (197)
132 (111)
5 (2)
47 (107)
8 (10)2 (0)
1 (3)
1 (0)
501 (283)
95 (68)
11 (1)
289 (379)
190 (138)
Delta Rd
Sellers Rd
33 (88)
87 (203)
36 (51)
22 (26)143 (149)
3 (13)
3 (21)
63 (85)
38 (43)
16 (41)
63 (113)
41 (52)
Laurel Rd
Main St
107 (136)348 (370)
91 (94)
192 (148)465 (326)61 (95)
104 (57)
162 (95)
176 (58)
186 (197)
56 (162)
101 (123)
Delta Rd
Main St
348 (562)
69 (105)
569 (445)151 (112)
190 (134)
58 (52)
19%
63%
15%
1%
1% 1%
3 1
2 4
5 6
7 Figure 9: Existing plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 270-044
TJKM
XX AM Peak Hour Volume
LEGEND
(XX) PM Peak Hour Volume
416
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
32 5.0 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS
This scenario evaluates the project’s contribution to potential background traffic impacts. Future impacts were evaluated taking into account key planned improvements in the City of Oakley. The most notable project is the completion of the Laurel Road extension between Main Street and Sellers Avenue. This includes a railroad grade separation and widening/construction of Laurel Road to four lanes in this section. In addition, Sellers Avenue is planned to be widened to four lanes between Laurel Road and E.

Cypress Road. Cypress Road is planned to be fully improved to six lanes east of Sellers Avenue and to four lanes west of Sellers Avenue. Other roads and intersections are scheduled to be improved as well.

Figure 10 shows the redistribution of existing traffic as depicted in the Updated Oakley Traffic Model with the Laurel Road extension.

5.1 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH
Using the calibrated and validated updated Citywide Traffic Model, additional traffic projected to be generated from approved developments was forecasted for Background Conditions. The Background Conditions scenario includes additional traffic that would be generated by various approved projects completed within the City of Oakley and redistribution of traffic due to the Laurel Road extension. The approved projects include the Acacia Residential, Emerson Ranch Commercial, and Burroughs/WestGate Ventures Residential projects previously completed by TJKM.

Additionally, he following planned improvements, as per the Capital Improvement Program, are considered at the study intersections with and without the proposed project:
 Sellers Avenue/E. Cypress Road is analyzed with the recent upgrade to lane geometry and signal timing. Additionally, the intersection considers planned widenings of Sellers Avenue and E.

Cypress Road segments. The intersection is analyzed with one shared through-left lane and two right-turn lanes at the southbound approach; one exclusive left-turn lane, one shared throughright lane and two right-turn lanes at the northbound approach; one left-turn lane, two through lanes and one shared through-right lane at the eastbound approach; and two exclusive left-turn lanes, one through lane and one shared through-right lane at the westbound approach.  Main Street/Laurel Road is analyzed with future planned upgrade to striping at the northbound, eastbound and westbound approaches under Background Conditions. The intersection is analyzed with one exclusive left-turn lane, two through lanes and one exclusive right-turn lane at the northbound approach; one exclusive left-turn lane, two through lanes and one exclusive rightturn lane at the eastbound approach; and one exclusive left-turn lane, three through lanes and one exclusive right-turn lane at the westbound approach.  Main Street/Delta Road is analyzed as a signalized intersection with updated lane geometry under Background Conditions. The intersection is analyzed with exclusive left-turn and right-turn lanes at the westbound approach, one through lane and one shared through-right lane at the northbound approach, and one exclusive left-turn lane and two through lanes at the southbound approach.
 Sellers Avenue/Laurel Road is a new intersection analyzed under Background Conditions. This intersection is formed due to the extension of Laurel Road. The intersection is analyzed as a 417
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
33 signalized intersection with two left-turn lanes and one right-turn lane at the eastbound approach, one exclusive left-turn lane and two through lanes at the northbound approach, and one through lane and two right-turn lanes at the southbound approach.

5.2 INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – BACKGROUND NO-PROJECT CONDITIONS Figure 11 shows the forecasted volumes at each intersection under Background Conditions, based on the update of the Oakley Citywide Traffic Model. Table 6 summarizes peak hour levels of service at the study intersections under Background Conditions without the proposed Project. Detailed LOS worksheets for this scenario are provided in Appendix D. Under Background Conditions, all study intersections operate within acceptable jurisdictional standards of LOS D/E or better during the both peak hours.

Table 6: Intersection Level of Service – Background Conditions Notes: Bold text indicates unacceptable intersection operations. *Indicates Routes of Regional Significance (East County Action Plan, CCTA, 2019). **Analyzed under plus Project Scenarios, only.
***Analyzed under Background Scenarios, only.
1 Indicates intersection is located in Priority Development Area and has standard of LOS E (Plan Bay Area 2050). 2 AWSC – All-way stop control; TWSC – Two-way stop control. 3 A.M. – Morning peak hour; P.M. – Evening peak hour.
4 Delay: Average control delay in seconds per vehicle, reported values are overall for signalized and all-way-stop-control intersections; and critical minor approaches for one- and two-way stop-control intersections. 5 LOS: Level of Service.

ID Intersection Control2 Peak
Hour3
Background Conditions
Average
Delay4 LOS5
1 Sellers Road / E. Cypress Road* Signalized A.M. 43.8 D P.M. 36.7 D
2 Sellers Road / Laurel Road*** Signalized A.M. 48.7 D
P.M. 50.5 D
3 Sellers Road / Delta Road AWSC A.M. 10.2 B
P.M. 19.1 C
4 Sellers Road / Project Access 1** One-Way Stop A.M. - - P.M. - -
5 Seller Road / Project Access 2** One-Way Stop A.M. - - P.M. - -
6 Main Street / Laurel Road*1 Signalized A.M. 52.6 D
P.M. 52.0 D
7 Main Street / Delta Road*1 Signalized
A.M. 11.9 B
P.M. 7.9 A
418
Traffic Signal
Intersection #1
Sellers Rd / E Cypress Rd
Intersection #2
Sellers Rd / Laurel Rd
Intersection #3
Sellers Rd / Delta Rd
Intersection #6
Main St / Laurel Rd
Intersection #7
Main St / Delta Rd
Laurel Rd
Laurel Rd
Main St
Delta Rd
Sellers Rd
Delta Rd
Sellers Rd
Main St
E Cypress Rd
Sellers Rd
-200 (-150)
+200 (+150) +200 (+150) +200 (+150)
-50 (-25)
+50 (+25)
-50 (-25)
+50 (+25)
-50 (-25)
+50 (+25)
+50 (+25)
-150 (-100)
Figure 10: Redistribution of Existing Trips for Background Conditions 270-044
LEGEND
Stop Sign TJKM
419
Intersection #1
Sellers Rd / E Cypress Rd
Intersection #2
Sellers Rd / Laurel Rd
Intersection #3
Sellers Rd/ Delta Rd
Intersection #6
Main St / Laurel Rd
Intersection #7
Main St / Delta Rd
Laurel Rd
Main St
Delta Rd
Main St
E Cypress Rd
Sellers Rd
174 (156)
67 (116)
241 (786)
173 (192)341 (412)153 (133)
370 (642)
71 (114)
640 (492)162 (140)
121 (187)215 (41)13 (14)
309 (341)496 (403)71 (127)
214 (18)
65 (10)
12 (12)
987 (793)
588 (316)
175 (77)
786 (297)
214 (60)
61 (181)
462 (990)
167 (83)
146 (299)
361 (852)
121 (205)
Delta Rd
Sellers Rd
3 (21)
63 (85)
158 (43)
34 (92)
88 (336)
85 (51)
0 (0)
196 (380)
52 (43)152 (227)
3 (13)
679 (185)273 (209)
25 (75)
63 (113)
44 (54)
295 (670)
50 (25)
Sellers Rd
Laurel Rd
Figure 11: Background Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 270-044
TJKM
XX AM Peak Hour Traffic Volume
LEGEND
(XX) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume
420
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
36 6.0 BACKGROUND PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS
This scenario is identical to Background No-Project Conditions, but with the addition of projected traffic from the proposed project. Trip generation, distribution, and assignment for the proposed project are adjusted to account for traffic redistribution with the Laurel Road extension. Figures 8a and 8b show the trip distribution and assignment under Background plus Project Conditions.

6.1 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – BACKGROUND PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS Figure 12 shows the forecasted volumes at each intersection under Background plus Project Conditions, based on the updated Oakley Citywide Traffic Model and the proposed project traffic. Table 7 summarizes peak hour levels of service at the study intersections under Background plus Project Conditions, with Background Conditions results included for comparison purposes. Detailed LOS worksheets for Background plus Project Conditions are provided in Appendix E. As shown, all study intersections will continue to operate at acceptable LOS under Background plus Project conditions.

Table 7: Intersection Traffic Level of Service – Background plus Project Conditions Notes: Bold text indicates unacceptable intersection operations. *Indicates Routes of Regional Significance (East County Action Plan, CCTA, 2019). **Analyzed under plus Project Scenarios, only.
***Analyzed under Background Scenarios, only.
1 Indicates intersection is located in Priority Development Area and has standard of LOS E (Plan Bay Area 2050). 2 AWSC – All-way stop control; TWSC – Two-way stop control. 3 A.M. – Morning peak hour; P.M. – Evening peak hour.
4 Delay: Average control delay in seconds per vehicle, reported values are overall for signalized and all-way-stop-control intersections; and critical minor approaches for one- and two-way stop-control intersections. 5 LOS: Level of Service.

ID Intersection Control2 Peak
Hour3
Background
Conditions
Background plus
Project Conditions Substantial
Impact?
(Y/N) Average
Delay4 LOS5 Average Delay4 LOS5
1 Sellers Road / E. Cypress
Road* Signalized A.M. 43.8 D 45.7 D N
P.M. 36.7 D 37.0 D N
2 Sellers Road / Laurel Road*** Signalized A.M. 48.7 D 49.2 D N P.M. 50.5 D 50.7 D N
3 Sellers Road / Delta Road AWSC A.M. 10.2 B 10.3 B N
P.M. 19.1 C 19.3 C N
4 Sellers Road / Project Access
1**
One-Way
Stop
A.M. - - 11.0 B N
P.M. - - 11.3 B N
5 Seller Road / Project Access
2**
One-Way
Stop
A.M. - - 10.9 B N
P.M. - - 11.2 B N
6 Main Street / Laurel Road*1 Signalized A.M. 52.6 D 53.0 D N P.M. 52.0 D 52.0 D N
7 Main Street / Delta Road*1 Signalized A.M. 11.9 B 12.0 B N P.M. 7.9 A 8.0 A N
421
Mailcoat Ave
Main St
E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Delta Rd Delta Rd
W Cypress Rd
Sellers Ave Sellers Ave
Knightsen Ave
Broadway St
Emerson Ranch Wy
Franklin Ln
Machado Ln
Jersey Island Rd
Picasso Dr
Frank Hengel Wy
Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Simoni Ranch Rd
W Bolton Rd
Brownstone Rd
Hill Ave
Intersection #7
Main St / Delta Rd
Intersection #1
Sellers Rd / E Cypress Rd
Intersection #2
Sellers Rd / Laurel Rd
Intersection #3
Sellers Rd / Delta Rd
Intersection #4
Sellers Rd / Project Access #1
Intersection #5
Sellers Rd / Project Access #2
Intersection #6
Main St / Laurel Rd
Main St
Delta Rd
Sellers Rd
Future Laurel Rd
Sellers Rd
Project Access #1
Sellers Rd
Project Access #2
7 (25)
282 (234)
4 (3)
18 (13)
215 (393)
8 (24)
278 (213)
4 (2)
18 (12)
23 (16)
210 (390)
E Cypress Rd
Sellers Rd
186 (165)
67 (116)
242 (786)
121 (187)215 (41)
13 (14)
12 (12)
987 (793)
588 (316)
61 (181)
462 (990)
172 (97)
Delta Rd
Sellers Rd
34 (92)
89 (337)
85 (51)
59 (47)153 (228)
3 (13)
3 (21)
63 (85)
158 ( 43)
25 (75)
63 ( 113)
44 (54)
Laurel Rd
Main St
173 (192)341 (412)
155 (140)
309 (341)496 (403)71 (127)
175 (77)
809 (313)
214 (60)
146 (299)
369 (879)
121 (205)
372 (649)
71 (114)
214 (18)
72 (14)
640 (492)162 (140)
689 (191)
279 (225)
60 (59)
308 (680)
1 (1)
197 (381)
19%
53%
15%
1%
1% 1%
10%
3 1
2 4
5 6
7 Figure 12: Background plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 270-044
TJKM
XX AM Peak Hour Volume
LEGEND
(XX) PM Peak Hour Volume
422
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
38 7.0 ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS
The following sections provide additional analyses of other transportation issues associated with the project site, including:
 Site access, circulation, and multimodal impacts
 Sight Distance Analysis
 Parking Analysis
 Queueing Analysis
The analyses in these sections are based on professional judgment in accordance with the standards and methods employed by traffic engineers. Although operational issues are not considered CEQA impacts, they do describe traffic conditions that are relevant to describing the project environment.

7.1 SITE ACCESS, CIRCULATION, AND MULTIMODAL IMPACTS
Site Access and On-Site Circulation
The proposed project is located in the southwest quadrant of the future intersection of Sellers Road and Laurel Road (Intersection #2). The project proposes internal roadways, accessible from Sellers Road, which provide access to the single family homes, as shown in Figure 2. The roadway widths, including sidewalks on both sides, will range between 40 and 48 feet wide. The project proposes to provide sidewalks with landscaping on both sides of the internal roadways and on the west side of Sellers Road. Additionally, the project driveway will provide curb ramps at both driveways and at the southwest corner of the Sellers Road and Future Laurel Road intersection. The project driveways on Sellers Road will both be one-way stop controlled with vehicles entering and exiting the site anticipated to be travelling at 25 to 30 miles per hour (mph). Emergency vehicles will access the project site via the two proposed intersections on Sellers Road.

The site circulation works well for vehicular traffic with multiple routes providing access to the singlefamily homes. The internal roadways, which will provide access to the single-family residences, accommodates two-way travel. The proposed roadway also accommodates emergency and garbage truck circulation. Based on the current site plan, it is not clear if the internal roadways accommodate on-street parking. TJKM recommends the project accommodate on-street parking on both sides of the internal roadways.

Pedestrian Facilities Impacts
Pedestrian access would be provided via proposed sidewalks along the project frontage on the west side of Sellers Road and both sides of the future Laurel Road, and within the project site. All internal streets would have sidewalks to provide accessible paths of travel to each home. TJKM recommends the sidewalk widths are at least six feet wide, and curb ramps are provided at all internal crossings to provide adequate pedestrian facilities.

A significant impact occurs if the proposed project conflicts with applicable or adopted policies, plans or programs related to pedestrians facilities or otherwise decreases the performance or safety of pedestrian 423
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
39 facilities. The proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to the nearby and future proposed pedestrian facilities.

Bicycle Facilities Impacts
Bicycle access to the project site would be provided by the nearest bicycle facilities, which are existing Class II bike lane facilities along both sides of E. Cypress Road and both sides of Laurel Road, west of Main Street. The project does not propose to provide new bicycle facilities. The Contra Costa County Transportation Authority Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan proposes Class II bike lanes Sellers Road, south of E. Cypress Road, which is along the project frontage.

An impact to bicyclists occurs if the proposed project disrupt existing bicycle facilities; or conflict or create inconsistencies with adopted bicycle system plans, guidelines, and policies. A significant impact occurs if the proposed project conflicts with applicable or adopted policies, plans or programs related to bicycle facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of bicycle facilities. The proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to the nearby and future proposed bicycle facilities.

Transit Facilities Impacts
A proposed project is considered to have a significant impact on transit if it conflicts with existing or planned transit facilities, or is expected to generate additional transit trips and does not provide adequate facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists to access transit routes and stops.

The nearest transit facility is currently located at the intersection of Main Street and E. Cypress Road, and in the future, at the intersection of Main Street and Laurel Road, which will be accessible with the future planned extension of Laurel Road. The bus stops are not accessible via sidewalks and bike facilities, however, future planned facilities, and the extension of Laurel Road, will make the bus stops more accessible to and from the project site. The proposed project will likely not add a significant amount of volume to existing bus service capacity. Therefore, the proposed project is not expected to result in any significant impacts to the nearby transit network.

7.2 SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS
Sellers Road is currently a two-lane bidirectional roadway and has a posted speed limit of 50 mph near the project site. The proposed project will pave new roadways within the project site, and provide two access points on the west side of Sellers Avenue. As per the proposed site plan (Figure 2), oncoming traffic travelling northbound and southbound on Sellers Road have a clear line of sight to vehicles exiting the project site for at least 430 feet, north and south of both project entrances. No obstructions to sight distance are expected, however, TJKM recommends that on-street parking is prohibited on Sellers Road, along the project frontage.

7.3 PARKING ANALYSIS
Under the City of Oakley zoning regulations, the proposed project is classified as a single family residential use. For single family dwelling units, the City of Oakley Municipal Parking Code (Chapter

9.1.1402) requires two covered off-street parking spaces per unit. In order to satisfy City of Oakley Code 424
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
40 requirements, TJKM recommends the project provide two covered parking spaces at each dwelling unit lot (170 total parking spaces). Assuming each residential unit provides a two-car garage, the proposed project meets the parking supply requirements for the City of Oakley. TJKM also recommends the project accommodates on-street parking along the proposed internal roadways to accommodate guest parking.

7.4 QUEUEING ANALYSIS
TJKM conducted a vehicle queuing and storage analysis for all exclusive left-turn or right-turn pockets at the study intersections where project traffic is added under Existing and Existing plus Project scenarios.

The 95th percentile (maximum) queues were analyzed using the HCM 6th Edition Queue methodology contained in Vistro software. Detailed calculations are included in the LOS appendices corresponding to each analysis scenario.

Table 8 summarizes the 95th percentile queue lengths at the study intersections under Existing and Existing plus Project scenarios. Under Existing plus Project scenarios, the proposed project increases queue length by a maximum of 20 feet, or less than one vehicle (one vehicle length=25 feet), at the intersection of Main Street/Laurel Road (Intersection #6). The addition of project traffic causes queue lengths to increase by approximately one vehicle at the eastbound left-turn at the intersection of Main Street and Laurel Road, and by less than one vehicle at the westbound left-turn at the intersection of Sellers Road/E. Cypress Road.

The intersection of Main Street and Laurel Road is significantly overloaded by projected development in the City of Oakley. Alternate access to the south is needed so traffic can reach an upgraded Laurel Road and Main Street intersection without having to use Main Street. This is included in the general plan.

Under Existing and Existing plus Project Conditions, the westbound left-turning traffic exceeds queueing capacity by a maximum 85 feet, or four car lengths during the a.m. peak. However, this overflow is not due to traffic generated by the proposed traffic, as the maximum queue length does not change with the addition of project traffic.

It is noted that the queuing issues described above may be resolved by Oakley’s planned improvements highlighted in the CIP.

Table 8: Queueing for Study Intersections, in Feet
# Study Intersections Lane
Group
Storage
Length
Existing Existing plus
Project Change

AM PM AM PM AM PM
1 Sellers Road / E. Cypress Road EBL 185 15 5 15 5 0 0
WBL 250 65 35 75 40 10 5
6 Main Street / Laurel Road
NBL 305 175 205 175 205 0 0
SBL 215 100 145 100 145 0 0
EBL 160 125 110 135 130 10 20
WBL 300 385 90 385 90 0 0
Notes:

Storage length and 95th percentile queue is expressed in feet per lane.

Bold indicates overflow.

Table 9 summarizes the 95th percentile queue lengths at the study intersections under Background and Background plus Project scenarios. Under Background plus Project scenarios, the proposed project 425
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
41 increases queue length by a maximum of 45 feet, or less than two vehicles (one vehicle length=25 feet), at the intersection of Sellers Road/Laurel Road (Intersection #2). The addition of project traffic causes queue lengths to increase by a maximum of one vehicle at the northbound left-turn at the intersection of Sellers Road and E. Cypress Road, two vehicles at the eastbound right-turn of Sellers Road and Laurel Road, and by less than one vehicle at the southbound right-turn at the intersection of Main Street/Laurel Road.

The intersections of Sellers Road/E. Cypress Road, Sellers Road/Laurel Road, and Main Street/Laurel Road are significantly overloaded by projected development in the City of Oakley. Under Background and Background plus Project Conditions, several turning lanes exceed queueing capacity during both peak periods. However, this overflow is not due to traffic generated by the proposed traffic, as the project adds a maximum of 25 feet, or one vehicle length, to the overflowing turning lanes.

It should also be noted that the Sellers Road/Laurel Road (Intersection #2) intersection is a future planned intersection, and thus, turn pockets and signal timing is assumed for this project. With the Laurel Road extension, improvements must be made to Main Street/Laurel Road (Intersection #6), as more traffic will be distributed through that intersection. These needed improvements are not reflected in this study.

Table 9: Queueing for Study Intersections, in Feet
# Study Intersections Lane
Group
Storage
Length
Background Background plus
Project Change

AM PM AM PM AM PM
1 Sellers Road / E. Cypress Road
NBL 150 255 145 280 155 25 10
SBTL 110 365 80 380 80 15 0
EBL 185 105 205 105 210 0 5
WBL 250 410 175 430 175 20 0
2 Sellers Road / Laurel Road*
NBL 100 0 0 40 25 40 25
SBR 100 470 120 475 125 5 5
EBR 100 60 30 75 75 15 45
6 Main Street / Laurel Road
NBL 305 380 320 380 320 0 0
SBL 215 145 225 145 225 0 0
SBR 215 530 400 550 410 20 10
EBL 160 270 585 270 585 0 0
EBR 160 170 260 165 255 -5 -5
WBL 240 465 115 465 115 0 0
WBR 100 285 125 280 125 -5 0
7 Main Street / Delta Road
NBR 100 20 15 20 15 0 0
SBL 95 70 45 70 45 0 0
WBR 100 75 5 75 5 0 0
Notes:

Storage length and 95th percentile queue is expressed in feet per lane.

Bold indicates overflow.
*Indicates a future planned intersection, thus turn pocket lengths are assumed.

426
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
42 Appendix A
Existing Conditions LOS Reports

427
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.535
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 18.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Sellers Rd/E Cypress Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 45.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 185.00 100.00 100.00 250.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Intersection Setup
1 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 1: 1 Existing Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
428
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 125 6 61 1 3 12 14 357 219 136 716 1 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 31 2 15 0 1 3 3 89 55 34 179 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.7700 0.7700 0.7700 0.6900 0.6900 0.6900 0.8100 0.8100 0.8100 0.7000 0.7000 0.7000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 96 5 47 1 2 8 11 289 177 95 501 1 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 96 5 47 1 2 8 11 289 177 95 501 1 Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Volumes
2 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 1: 1 Existing Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
429
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 30 60 0 30 60 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 8 0 0 4 0 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
3 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 1: 1 Existing Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
430
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 89.89 19.35 16.06 221.75 66.54 207.36 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 3.60 0.77 0.64 8.87 2.66 8.29 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 49.94 10.75 8.92 128.72 36.97 118.20 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.00 0.43 0.36 5.15 1.48 4.73 Critical Lane Group Yes Yes No Yes Yes No
Lane Group LOS C F E B C B
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 23.71 83.16 74.91 18.02 25.41 13.32 X, volume / capacity 0.79 0.98 0.93 0.84 0.77 0.79
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 2.23 57.49 49.22 3.94 2.67 2.31 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.15 0.04 0.15
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 21.47 25.66 25.69 14.07 22.73 11.01 c, Capacity [veh/h] 242 16 15 688 177 903
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1690 1620 1752 1724 1752 1840 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.11 0.01 0.01 0.33 0.08 0.39 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.14 0.01 0.01 0.40 0.10 0.49
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 7 1 0 21 5 25
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 4.00 6.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 52 52 52 52 52 52
Lane Group C C L C L C
Lane Group Calculations
4 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 1: 1 Existing Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
431
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 23.71 23.71 23.71 83.16 83.16 83.16 74.91 18.02 18.02 25.41 13.32 13.32 Movement LOS C C C F F F E B B C B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 23.71 83.16 19.37 15.24
Approach LOS C F B B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 18.36
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.535
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 34.67 34.67 34.67 34.67
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.161 1.744 2.643 2.629 Crosswalk LOS B A B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 667 667 1333 1333 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 20.00 20.00 5.00 5.00
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.876 1.586 2.533 2.967 Bicycle LOS A A B C
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 4 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
5 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 1: 1 Existing Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
432
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.249
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 9.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 3: Sellers Rd/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 39 102 43 3 163 17 17 82 53 47 78 4 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 10 26 11 1 41 4 4 20 13 12 19 1 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8700 0.8700 0.8700 0.7700 0.7700 0.7700 0.8100 0.8100 0.8100 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 33 86 36 3 142 15 13 63 41 38 63 3 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 33 86 36 3 142 15 13 63 41 38 63 3 Name
Volumes
6 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 1: 1 Existing Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
433
Intersection LOS A
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 9.37
Approach LOS A A A A
Approach Delay [s/veh] 9.44 9.50 9.16 9.32
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 24.36 24.48 19.32 16.85 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 0.97 0.98 0.77 0.67
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.25 0.25 0.21 0.18
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 743 736 736 698
Lanes
Intersection Settings
7 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 1: 1 Existing Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
434
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.585
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 40.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Main St/Laurel Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 480.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 305.00 100.00 100.00 215.00 100.00 215.00 160.00 100.00 100.00 300.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Intersection Setup
8 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 1: 1 Existing Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
435
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 1 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 2 0 2 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 2 0 2 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 134 435 114 76 581 205 196 62 112 263 242 155 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 33 109 28 19 145 51 49 16 28 66 60 39 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.6700 0.6700 0.6700 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 107 348 91 61 465 164 176 56 101 176 162 104 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 107 348 91 61 465 164 176 56 101 176 162 104 Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Volumes
9 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 1: 1 Existing Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
436
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No Yes No Yes No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.1 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 18 0 0 24 0 0 26 0 0 30 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Split [s] 15 38 0 15 38 0 18 40 0 22 44 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.1 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 20 40 0 16 40 0 16 20 0 16 20 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 10 0 6 10 0 6 6 0 6 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 7 4 0 3 8 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lagging Force-Off
Offset [s] 108.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 115
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
10 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 1: 1 Existing Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
437
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 176.16 211.84 201.82 102.01 329.07 307.87 125.54 68.29 128.93 383.09 437.78 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 7.05 8.47 8.07 4.08 13.16 12.31 5.02 2.73 5.16 15.32 17.51 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 97.87 121.47 114.19 56.67 210.19 193.73 69.74 37.94 71.63 252.73 296.56 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 3.91 4.86 4.57 2.27 8.41 7.75 2.79 1.52 2.87 10.11 11.86 Critical Lane Group Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Lane Group LOS E C C E C C D D D F D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 55.59 20.50 20.61 58.59 26.54 26.89 54.00 42.13 44.17 83.83 51.46 X, volume / capacity 0.83 0.33 0.33 0.78 0.52 0.52 0.76 0.21 0.45 0.95 0.94 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 4.20 1.02 1.11 4.96 2.40 2.69 1.80 0.13 0.47 35.75 8.85 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.37 0.09 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 51.39 19.48 19.50 53.63 24.14 24.20 52.21 42.00 43.70 48.08 42.61 c, Capacity [veh/h] 161 861 801 98 795 719 256 296 250 276 423 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1767 1855 1724 1767 1855 1679 3431 1855 1565 1767 1735 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.03 0.07 0.15 0.23 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.09 0.46 0.46 0.05 0.43 0.43 0.07 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.24 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 10 53 53 6 49 49 9 18 18 18 28 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.40 3.40 2.00 3.10 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.40 5.40 4.00 5.10 C, Cycle Length [s] 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 Lane Group L C C L C C L C R L C
Lane Group Calculations
11 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 1: 1 Existing Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
438
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 55.59 20.54 20.61 58.59 26.64 26.89 54.00 42.13 44.17 83.83 51.46 51.46 Movement LOS E C C E C C D D D F D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 27.43 29.52 49.04 64.36
Approach LOS C C D E
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 40.70
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.585
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 2019.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 47.03 47.03 47.03 47.03
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.738 2.740 2.671 2.298 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 565 565 602 677 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 29.59 29.61 28.11 25.18
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.123 2.271 2.170 2.649 Bicycle LOS B B B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
12 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 1: 1 Existing Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
439
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.566
Level Of Service: F
Delay (sec / veh): 93.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 7: Main St/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 95.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 387 73 194 729 59 221
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 97 18 48 182 15 55
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9000 0.9000 0.7800 0.7800 0.8600 0.8600 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 348 66 151 569 51 190
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 348 66 151 569 51 190
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Volumes
13 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 1: 1 Existing Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
440
Intersection LOS F
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 12.87
Approach LOS A A F
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 1.89 70.23
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 15.98 0.00 219.46 219.46 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.00 8.78 8.78 Movement LOS A A A A F F
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 8.97 0.00 92.97 64.16 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.01 0.57 0.35
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
14 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 1: 1 Existing Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
441
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.487
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 17.2
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Sellers Rd/E Cypress Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 45.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 185.00 100.00 100.00 250.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Intersection Setup
1 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 3: 3 Existing Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
442
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 1 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 102 2 126 5 0 15 1 412 104 75 311 0 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 26 1 32 1 0 4 0 103 26 19 78 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.6500 0.6500 0.6500 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9100 0.9100 0.9100 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 86 2 106 3 0 10 1 379 96 68 283 0 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 86 2 106 3 0 10 1 379 96 68 283 0 Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Volumes
2 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 3: 3 Existing Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
443
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 30 60 0 30 60 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 8 0 0 4 0 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
3 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 3: 3 Existing Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
444
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 86.88 20.38 3.56 174.43 35.08 65.05 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 3.48 0.82 0.14 6.98 1.40 2.60 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 48.27 11.32 1.98 96.91 19.49 36.14 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.93 0.45 0.08 3.88 0.78 1.45 Critical Lane Group Yes Yes No Yes Yes No
Lane Group LOS C E F B C A
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 20.00 70.73 271.96 16.47 26.61 9.82 X, volume / capacity 0.80 0.97 0.99 0.80 0.79 0.41
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.95 48.22 249.16 3.40 5.30 0.49 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.15 0.04 0.15
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 18.05 22.51 22.80 13.07 21.31 9.33 c, Capacity [veh/h] 288 21 1 642 95 767
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1645 1607 1752 1768 1752 1840 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.14 0.01 0.00 0.29 0.04 0.17 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.17 0.01 0.00 0.36 0.05 0.42
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 8 1 0 17 2 19
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 4.00 6.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 45 45 45 45 45 45
Lane Group C C L C L C
Lane Group Calculations
4 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 3: 3 Existing Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
445
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 20.00 20.00 20.00 70.73 70.73 70.73 271.96 16.47 16.47 26.61 9.82 9.82 Movement LOS C C C E E E F B B C A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 20.00 70.73 16.96 13.08
Approach LOS C E B B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 17.20
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.487
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 34.67 34.67 34.67 34.67
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.047 1.733 2.400 2.443 Crosswalk LOS B A B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 667 667 1333 1333 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 20.00 20.00 5.00 5.00
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.939 1.593 2.413 2.197 Bicycle LOS A A B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 4 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
5 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 3: 3 Existing Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
446
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.575
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 13.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 3: Sellers Rd/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Delta Rd Delta Rd
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 99 228 57 14 162 24 35 115 53 51 100 25 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 25 57 14 4 40 6 9 29 13 13 25 6 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9800 0.9800 0.9800 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 88 203 51 13 149 22 34 113 52 43 85 21 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 88 203 51 13 149 22 34 113 52 43 85 21 Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Delta Rd Delta Rd
Volumes
6 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 3: 3 Existing Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
447
Intersection LOS B
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 13.01
Approach LOS C B B B
Approach Delay [s/veh] 15.42 11.27 11.60 11.37
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 91.94 33.71 35.50 30.08 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 3.68 1.35 1.42 1.20
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.57 0.32 0.33 0.29
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 668 634 620 605
Lanes
Intersection Settings
7 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 3: 3 Existing Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
448
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.386
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 32.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Main St/Laurel Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 480.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 305.00 100.00 100.00 215.00 100.00 215.00 160.00 100.00 100.00 300.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Intersection Setup
8 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 3: 3 Existing Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
449
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 1
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 1 0 0 1
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 1 0 0 1
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 1 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 1 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 153 416 106 108 370 147 172 169 128 67 110 66 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 38 104 26 27 93 37 43 42 32 17 28 17 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 0.9600 0.9600 0.9600 0.8600 0.8600 0.8600 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 136 370 94 95 326 129 165 162 123 58 95 57 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 136 370 94 95 326 129 165 162 123 58 95 57 Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Volumes
9 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 3: 3 Existing Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
450
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No Yes No Yes No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.1 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 18 0 0 24 0 0 26 0 0 30 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Split [s] 15 38 0 15 38 0 18 40 0 22 44 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.1 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 20 40 0 16 40 0 16 20 0 16 20 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 10 0 6 10 0 6 6 0 6 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 7 4 0 3 8 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lagging Force-Off
Offset [s] 108.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 115
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
10 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 3: 3 Existing Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
451
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 202.66 151.94 143.10 142.87 161.86 149.39 110.30 203.12 155.19 91.22 221.41 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 8.11 6.08 5.72 5.71 6.47 5.98 4.41 8.12 6.21 3.65 8.86 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 114.80 84.41 79.50 79.37 89.92 82.99 61.28 115.13 86.22 50.68 128.47 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 4.59 3.38 3.18 3.17 3.60 3.32 2.45 4.61 3.45 2.03 5.14 Critical Lane Group Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Lane Group LOS E B B E B B D D D E D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 58.05 12.63 12.69 56.68 13.89 14.00 54.36 48.62 47.94 59.32 53.79 X, volume / capacity 0.90 0.25 0.25 0.81 0.26 0.26 0.74 0.68 0.61 0.77 0.86 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 6.64 0.57 0.61 4.35 0.62 0.69 1.75 1.21 1.04 5.30 4.04 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 51.41 12.07 12.08 52.33 13.27 13.30 52.61 47.41 46.90 54.03 49.75 c, Capacity [veh/h] 170 1069 995 134 1031 933 232 249 211 87 205 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1767 1855 1726 1767 1855 1679 3431 1855 1573 1767 1730 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.09 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.09 0.08 0.04 0.10 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.10 0.58 0.58 0.08 0.56 0.56 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.05 0.12 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 11 66 66 9 64 64 8 15 15 6 14 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.40 3.40 2.00 3.10 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.40 5.40 4.00 5.10 C, Cycle Length [s] 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 Lane Group L C C L C C L C R L C
Lane Group Calculations
11 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 3: 3 Existing Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
452
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 58.05 12.65 12.69 56.68 13.92 14.00 54.36 48.62 47.94 59.32 53.79 53.79 Movement LOS E B B E B B D D D E D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 22.95 21.33 50.54 55.31
Approach LOS C C D E
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 32.79
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.386
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 7881.94 0.00 0.00 3329.98 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 47.03 47.03 47.03 47.03
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.634 2.644 2.655 2.189 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 565 565 602 677 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 29.59 29.59 28.11 25.19
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.116 2.075 2.333 1.961 Bicycle LOS B B B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
12 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 3: 3 Existing Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
453
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.375
Level Of Service: F
Delay (sec / veh): 54.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 7: Main St/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 95.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 598 104 123 489 51 141
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 149 26 31 122 13 35
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9400 0.9400 0.9100 0.9100 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 562 98 112 445 48 134
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 562 98 112 445 48 134
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Volumes
13 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 3: 3 Existing Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
454
Intersection LOS F
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 5.95
Approach LOS A A E
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 1.94 40.51
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 11.91 0.00 112.44 112.44 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 4.50 4.50 Movement LOS A A A A F E
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 9.67 0.00 54.31 35.52 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.37 0.30
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
14 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Road TIS
Scenario 3: 3 Existing Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
455
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
43 Appendix B
Existing plus Project Conditions LOS Reports

456
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.572
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 19.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Sellers Rd/E Cypress Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 45.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 185.00 100.00 100.00 250.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Intersection Setup
1 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
457
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 171 6 61 1 3 12 14 357 235 136 716 1 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 43 2 15 0 1 3 3 89 59 34 179 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.7700 0.7700 0.7700 0.6900 0.6900 0.6900 0.8100 0.8100 0.8100 0.7000 0.7000 0.7000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 132 5 47 1 2 8 11 289 190 95 501 1 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 96 5 47 1 2 8 11 289 177 95 501 1 Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Volumes
2 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
458
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 30 60 0 30 60 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 8 0 0 4 0 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
3 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
459
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 124.42 19.98 16.73 255.62 75.46 233.76 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 4.98 0.80 0.67 10.22 3.02 9.35 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 69.12 11.10 9.29 153.89 41.92 137.58 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.76 0.44 0.37 6.16 1.68 5.50 Critical Lane Group Yes Yes No Yes Yes No
Lane Group LOS C F E B C B
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 25.04 83.12 75.74 19.84 27.81 14.12 X, volume / capacity 0.82 0.97 0.92 0.85 0.77 0.79
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 2.18 54.81 47.40 4.33 2.71 2.19 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.15 0.04 0.15
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 22.86 28.31 28.34 15.51 25.10 11.93 c, Capacity [veh/h] 291 17 15 694 176 912
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1702 1620 1752 1720 1752 1840 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.14 0.01 0.01 0.34 0.08 0.39 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.17 0.01 0.01 0.40 0.10 0.50
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 10 1 0 23 6 28
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 4.00 6.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 57 57 57 57 57 57
Lane Group C C L C L C
Lane Group Calculations
4 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
460
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 25.04 25.04 25.04 83.12 83.12 83.12 75.74 19.84 19.84 27.81 14.12 14.12 Movement LOS C C C F F F E B B C B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 25.04 83.12 21.13 16.30
Approach LOS C F C B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 19.85
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.572
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 34.67 34.67 34.67 34.67
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.212 1.744 2.673 2.629 Crosswalk LOS B A B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 667 667 1333 1333 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 20.00 20.00 5.00 5.00
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.952 1.586 2.560 2.967 Bicycle LOS A A B C
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 4 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
5 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
461
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.261
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 9.5
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 3: Sellers Rd/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 39 104 43 3 164 25 21 82 53 47 78 4 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 10 26 11 1 41 6 5 20 13 12 19 1 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8700 0.8700 0.8700 0.7700 0.7700 0.7700 0.8100 0.8100 0.8100 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 33 87 36 3 143 22 16 63 41 38 63 3 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 1 0 0 1 7 3 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 33 86 36 3 142 15 13 63 41 38 63 3 Name
Volumes
6 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
462
Intersection LOS A
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 9.46
Approach LOS A A A A
Approach Delay [s/veh] 9.51 9.61 9.27 9.38
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 24.90 26.06 20.16 17.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 1.00 1.04 0.81 0.68
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.25 0.26 0.21 0.19
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 738 736 730 693
Lanes
Intersection Settings
7 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
463
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.032
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 11.6
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 4: Sellers Rd/Project Access 1
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 1
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 2 166 281 6 18 4
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1 42 70 2 5 1
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 2 166 281 6 18 4
Other Volume [veh/h] 2 18 7 6 18 4
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 148 274 0 0 0
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 1
Volumes
8 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
464
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.56
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.09 0.00 11.34
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.00 2.90 2.90 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 Movement LOS A A A A B B
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.63 10.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
9 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
465
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.031
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 11.5
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: Sellers Rd/Project Access 2
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 2
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 2 150 278 7 18 4
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1 38 70 2 5 1
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 2 150 278 7 18 4
Other Volume [veh/h] 2 2 4 7 18 4
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 148 274 0 0 0
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 2
Volumes
10 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
466
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.57
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.10 0.00 11.20
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.00 2.84 2.84 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.47 9.98 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
11 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
467
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.600
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 40.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Main St/Laurel Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 480.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 305.00 100.00 100.00 215.00 100.00 215.00 160.00 100.00 100.00 300.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Intersection Setup
12 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
468
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 1 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 2 0 2 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 2 0 2 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 134 435 114 76 581 240 207 62 112 263 242 155 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 33 109 28 19 145 60 52 16 28 66 60 39 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.6700 0.6700 0.6700 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 107 348 91 61 465 192 186 56 101 176 162 104 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 28 10 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 107 348 91 61 465 164 176 56 101 176 162 104 Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Volumes
13 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
469
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No Yes No Yes No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.1 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 18 0 0 24 0 0 26 0 0 30 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Split [s] 15 38 0 15 38 0 18 40 0 22 44 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.1 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 20 40 0 16 40 0 16 20 0 16 20 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 10 0 6 10 0 6 6 0 6 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 7 4 0 3 8 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lagging Force-Off
Offset [s] 108.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 115
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
14 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
470
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 176.16 213.10 203.01 102.01 349.55 324.19 132.52 67.99 128.33 383.09 438.92 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 7.05 8.52 8.12 4.08 13.98 12.97 5.30 2.72 5.13 15.32 17.56 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 97.87 122.39 115.06 56.67 226.22 206.39 73.62 37.77 71.29 252.73 297.49 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 3.91 4.90 4.60 2.27 9.05 8.26 2.94 1.51 2.85 10.11 11.90 Critical Lane Group Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Lane Group LOS E C C E C C D D D F D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 55.59 20.75 20.87 58.59 27.48 27.92 53.84 41.81 43.81 83.83 51.78 X, volume / capacity 0.83 0.33 0.33 0.78 0.55 0.55 0.77 0.21 0.44 0.95 0.94 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 4.20 1.04 1.13 4.96 2.72 3.10 1.82 0.12 0.44 35.75 9.16 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.37 0.10 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 51.39 19.71 19.74 53.63 24.76 24.83 52.03 41.68 43.37 48.08 42.61 c, Capacity [veh/h] 161 855 795 98 789 705 267 302 255 276 423 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1767 1855 1724 1767 1855 1659 3431 1855 1565 1767 1735 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.03 0.07 0.15 0.23 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.09 0.46 0.46 0.05 0.43 0.43 0.08 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.24 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 10 53 53 6 49 49 9 19 19 18 28 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.40 3.40 2.00 3.10 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.40 5.40 4.00 5.10 C, Cycle Length [s] 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 Lane Group L C C L C C L C R L C
Lane Group Calculations
15 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
471
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 55.59 20.79 20.87 58.59 27.60 27.92 53.84 41.81 43.81 83.83 51.78 51.78 Movement LOS E C C E C C D D D F D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 27.63 30.31 48.94 64.55
Approach LOS C C D E
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 40.94
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.600
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 2019.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 47.03 47.03 47.03 47.03
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.738 2.752 2.681 2.298 Crosswalk LOS B C B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 565 565 602 677 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 29.59 29.61 28.11 25.18
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.123 2.300 2.188 2.649 Bicycle LOS B B B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
16 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
472
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.645
Level Of Service: F
Delay (sec / veh): 113.6
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 7: Main St/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 95.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 387 77 194 729 67 221
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 97 19 48 182 17 55
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9000 0.9000 0.7800 0.7800 0.8600 0.8600 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 348 69 151 569 58 190
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 3 0 0 7 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 348 66 151 569 51 190
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Volumes
17 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
473
Intersection LOS F
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 16.76
Approach LOS A A F
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 1.89 91.43
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 16.04 0.00 258.26 258.26 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.00 10.33 10.33 Movement LOS A A A A F F
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 8.99 0.00 113.61 84.70 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.01 0.64 0.35
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
18 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 5: 5 Existing plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
474
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.535
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 18.5
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Sellers Rd/E Cypress Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 45.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 185.00 100.00 100.00 250.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Intersection Setup
1 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
475
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 1 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 132 2 127 5 0 15 1 412 150 75 311 0 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 33 1 32 1 0 4 0 103 38 19 78 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.6500 0.6500 0.6500 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9100 0.9100 0.9100 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 111 2 107 3 0 10 1 379 138 68 283 0 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 25 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 86 2 106 3 0 10 1 379 96 68 283 0 Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Volumes
2 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
476
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 30 60 0 30 60 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 8 0 0 4 0 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
3 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
477
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 114.50 21.34 3.66 214.92 39.95 73.55 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 4.58 0.85 0.15 8.60 1.60 2.94 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 63.61 11.85 2.03 123.71 22.19 40.86 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.54 0.47 0.08 4.95 0.89 1.63 Critical Lane Group Yes Yes No Yes Yes No
Lane Group LOS C E F B C A
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 21.79 71.49 280.22 17.95 28.98 10.00 X, volume / capacity 0.82 0.96 1.00 0.83 0.78 0.38
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 2.01 46.31 254.71 3.83 5.15 0.42 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.15 0.04 0.15
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 19.77 25.18 25.51 14.12 23.83 9.58 c, Capacity [veh/h] 318 21 1 677 96 813
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1656 1607 1752 1746 1752 1840 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.16 0.01 0.00 0.32 0.04 0.17 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.19 0.01 0.00 0.39 0.05 0.44
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 10 1 0 20 3 22
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 4.00 6.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 51 51 51 51 51 51
Lane Group C C L C L C
Lane Group Calculations
4 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
478
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 21.79 21.79 21.79 71.49 71.49 71.49 280.22 17.95 17.95 28.98 10.00 10.00 Movement LOS C C C E E E F B B C A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 21.79 71.49 18.41 13.69
Approach LOS C E B B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 18.51
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.535
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 34.67 34.67 34.67 34.67
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.109 1.733 2.437 2.443 Crosswalk LOS B A B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 667 667 1333 1333 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 20.00 20.00 5.00 5.00
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.990 1.593 2.489 2.197 Bicycle LOS A A B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 4 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
5 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
479
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.579
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 13.2
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 3: Sellers Rd/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Delta Rd Delta Rd
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 99 228 57 14 162 28 42 115 53 51 100 25 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 25 57 14 4 40 7 10 29 13 13 25 6 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9800 0.9800 0.9800 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 88 203 51 13 149 26 41 113 52 43 85 21 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 88 203 51 13 149 22 34 113 52 43 85 21 Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Delta Rd Delta Rd
Volumes
6 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
480
Intersection LOS B
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 13.16
Approach LOS C B B B
Approach Delay [s/veh] 15.62 11.40 11.82 11.45
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 93.21 34.90 37.61 30.36 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 3.73 1.40 1.50 1.21
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.58 0.32 0.34 0.29
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 663 631 617 601
Lanes
Intersection Settings
7 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
481
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.022
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 11.2
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 4: Sellers Rd/Project Access 1
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 1
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 3 207 185 21 13 2
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1 52 46 5 3 1
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 3 207 185 21 13 2
Other Volume [veh/h] 3 13 21 21 13 2
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 194 164 0 0 0
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 1
Volumes
8 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
482
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.43
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.11 0.00 10.93
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 1.85 1.85 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.17 9.40 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
9 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
483
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.021
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 11.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: Sellers Rd/Project Access 2
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 2
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 4 197 166 21 13 2
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1 49 42 5 3 1
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 4 197 166 21 13 2
Other Volume [veh/h] 4 3 2 21 13 2
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 194 164 0 0 0
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 2
Volumes
10 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
484
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.47
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.15 0.00 10.73
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.00 1.79 1.79 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.95 9.29 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
11 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
485
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.402
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 33.1
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Main St/Laurel Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 480.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 305.00 100.00 100.00 215.00 100.00 215.00 160.00 100.00 100.00 300.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Intersection Setup
12 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
486
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 1
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 1 0 0 1
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 1 0 0 1
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 1 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 1 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 153 416 106 108 370 168 205 169 128 67 110 66 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 38 104 26 27 93 42 51 42 32 17 28 17 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 0.9600 0.9600 0.9600 0.8600 0.8600 0.8600 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 136 370 94 95 326 148 197 162 123 58 95 57 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 19 32 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 136 370 94 95 326 129 165 162 123 58 95 57 Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Volumes
13 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
487
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No Yes No Yes No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.1 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 18 0 0 24 0 0 26 0 0 30 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Split [s] 15 38 0 15 38 0 18 40 0 22 44 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.1 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 20 40 0 16 40 0 16 20 0 16 20 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 10 0 6 10 0 6 6 0 6 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 7 4 0 3 8 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lagging Force-Off
Offset [s] 108.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 115
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
14 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
488
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 202.66 156.50 147.39 142.87 175.50 160.41 131.25 200.60 152.83 91.22 221.41 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 8.11 6.26 5.90 5.71 7.02 6.42 5.25 8.02 6.11 3.65 8.86 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 114.80 86.95 81.88 79.37 97.50 89.12 72.92 113.32 84.91 50.68 128.47 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 4.59 3.48 3.28 3.17 3.90 3.56 2.92 4.53 3.40 2.03 5.14 Critical Lane Group Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Lane Group LOS E B B E B B D D D E D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 58.05 13.21 13.28 56.68 14.65 14.77 53.87 47.29 46.69 59.32 53.79 X, volume / capacity 0.90 0.26 0.26 0.81 0.28 0.28 0.77 0.63 0.57 0.77 0.86 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 6.64 0.59 0.64 4.35 0.68 0.78 1.81 0.93 0.83 5.30 4.04 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 51.41 12.62 12.64 52.33 13.96 13.99 52.06 46.36 45.86 54.03 49.75 c, Capacity [veh/h] 170 1052 978 134 1013 908 265 267 226 87 205 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1767 1855 1726 1767 1855 1662 3431 1855 1573 1767 1730 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.09 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.09 0.08 0.04 0.10 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.10 0.57 0.57 0.08 0.55 0.55 0.08 0.14 0.14 0.05 0.12 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 11 65 65 9 63 63 9 17 17 6 14 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.40 3.40 2.00 3.10 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.40 5.40 4.00 5.10 C, Cycle Length [s] 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 Lane Group L C C L C C L C R L C
Lane Group Calculations
15 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
489
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 58.05 13.23 13.28 56.68 14.68 14.77 53.87 47.29 46.69 59.32 53.79 53.79 Movement LOS E B B E B B D D D E D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 23.40 21.72 49.82 55.32
Approach LOS C C D E
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 33.05
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.402
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 7881.94 0.00 0.00 3329.98 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 47.03 47.03 47.03 47.03
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.634 2.658 2.667 2.189 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 565 565 602 677 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 29.59 29.59 28.11 25.19
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.116 2.093 2.388 1.961 Bicycle LOS B B B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
16 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
490
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.407
Level Of Service: F
Delay (sec / veh): 58.1
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 7: Main St/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 95.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 598 112 123 489 55 141
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 149 28 31 122 14 35
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9400 0.9400 0.9100 0.9100 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 562 105 112 445 52 134
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 7 0 0 4 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 562 98 112 445 48 134
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Volumes
17 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
491
Intersection LOS F
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 6.53
Approach LOS A A E
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 1.95 44.51
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 122.94 122.94 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 4.92 4.92 Movement LOS A A A A F E
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 9.71 0.00 58.12 39.20 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.41 0.30
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
18 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 6: 6 Existing plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
492
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
44 Appendix C
Existing plus Project Conditions Mitigated LOS Reports

493
Minor Street Volume = 241
(182) VPH
Major Street Volume = 1,134 (1,217) VPH
A signal is WARRANTED in the a.m. Peak Hour
A signal is WARRANTED in the p.m. Peak Hour
Source: CA MUTCD 2014, Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies, Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals, Figure 4C-3
Peak Hour Warrant (Urban Areas)
Intersection #7: Main St. & Delta Rd., Oakley, CA
Scenario: Existing Conditions
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
494
Minor Street Volume = 248
(186) VPH
Major Street Volume = 1,137 (1,224) VPH
A signal is WARRANTED in the a.m. Peak Hour
A signal is WARRANTED in the p.m. Peak Hour
Source: CA MUTCD 2014, Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies, Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals, Figure 4C-3
Peak Hour Warrant (Urban Areas)
Intersection #7: Main St. & Delta Rd., Oakley, CA
Scenario: Existing plus Project Conditions
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
495
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.631
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 17.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 7: Main St/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 95.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Intersection Setup
1 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 9: 9 Existing plus Project Conditions AM - Mitigations Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
496
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 387 77 194 729 67 221
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 97 19 48 182 17 55
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9000 0.9000 0.7800 0.7800 0.8600 0.8600 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 348 69 151 569 58 190
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 3 0 0 7 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 348 66 151 569 51 190
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Volumes
2 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 9: 9 Existing plus Project Conditions AM - Mitigations Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
497
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.4 3.4 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10 0 0 10 17 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.4 4.4 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 60 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 0 5 5 5 0
Lead / Lag - - Lead - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 6 0 5 2 4 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
3 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 9: 9 Existing plus Project Conditions AM - Mitigations Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
498
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 211.28 105.69 194.22 147.30 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 8.45 4.23 7.77 5.89 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 121.06 58.71 108.72 81.84 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 4.84 2.35 4.35 3.27 Critical Lane Group No No Yes Yes
Lane Group LOS C C B C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 21.15 26.83 10.51 24.20 X, volume / capacity 0.87 0.79 0.78 0.83
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
d2, Incremental Delay [s] 4.58 5.54 1.45 5.23
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 16.57 21.29 9.06 18.98
c, Capacity [veh/h] 533 246 935 346
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1631 1599 1679 1464
(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.28 0.12 0.43 0.20 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.33 0.15 0.56 0.24
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 17 8 29 12
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.40 2.00 3.40 3.40
l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 5.40 4.00 5.40 5.40
C, Cycle Length [s] 52 52 52 52
Lane Group C L C C
Lane Group Calculations
4 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 9: 9 Existing plus Project Conditions AM - Mitigations Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
499
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 21.15 21.15 26.83 10.51 24.20 24.20 Movement LOS C C C B C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 21.15 13.94 24.20
Approach LOS C B C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 17.70
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.631
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F F F
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 667 1333 667 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 20.00 5.00 20.00
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.325 3.083 2.035 Bicycle LOS B C B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
5 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 9: 9 Existing plus Project Conditions AM - Mitigations Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
500
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.645
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 20.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 7: Main St/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 95.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Intersection Setup
1 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 10: 10 Existing plus Project Conditions PM - Mitigations Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
501
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 598 112 123 489 55 141
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 149 28 31 122 14 35
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9400 0.9400 0.9100 0.9100 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 562 105 112 445 52 134
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 7 0 0 4 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 562 98 112 445 48 134
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Volumes
2 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 10: 10 Existing plus Project Conditions PM - Mitigations Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
502
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.4 3.4 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10 0 0 10 17 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.4 4.4 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 60 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 0 5 5 5 0
Lead / Lag - - Lead - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 6 0 5 2 4 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
3 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 10: 10 Existing plus Project Conditions PM - Mitigations Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
503
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 337.58 78.49 72.01 114.96 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 13.50 3.14 2.88 4.60 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 216.84 43.60 40.01 63.87 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 8.67 1.74 1.60 2.55 Critical Lane Group Yes Yes No Yes
Lane Group LOS C C A C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 26.23 32.28 5.37 28.41
X, volume / capacity 0.93 0.78 0.46 0.81
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
d2, Incremental Delay [s] 12.40 7.98 0.30 6.21
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
k, delay calibration 0.28 0.11 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 13.83 24.30 5.07 22.20
c, Capacity [veh/h] 764 158 1073 243
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1633 1599 1679 1471
(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.43 0.08 0.29 0.13 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.47 0.10 0.64 0.17
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 26 5 35 9
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.40 2.00 3.40 3.40
l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 5.40 4.00 5.40 5.40
C, Cycle Length [s] 55 55 55 55
Lane Group C L C C
Lane Group Calculations
4 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 10: 10 Existing plus Project Conditions PM - Mitigations Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
504
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 26.23 26.23 32.28 5.37 28.41 28.41 Movement LOS C C C A C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 26.23 10.78 28.41
Approach LOS C B C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 20.28
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.645
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F F F
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 667 1333 667 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 20.00 5.00 20.00
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.731 2.569 1.883 Bicycle LOS B B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
5 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 10: 10 Existing plus Project Conditions PM - Mitigations Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
505
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
45 Appendix D
Background Conditions LOS Reports

506
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.742
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 43.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Sellers Rd/E Cypress Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 45.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocke 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 150.00 100.00 150.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 185.00 100.00 185.00 250.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pock 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Intersection Setup
1 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
507
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/ 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestria 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestri 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Pa No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [ve 226 87 313 19 312 175 75 570 206 840 1410 17 Total 15-Minute Volume [ 56 22 78 5 78 44 19 143 52 210 353 4 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.7700 0.7700 0.7700 0.6900 0.6900 0.6900 0.8100 0.8100 0.8100 0.7000 0.7000 0.7000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/ 174 67 241 13 215 121 61 462 167 588 987 12 Right Turn on Red Volum 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment 9 10 27 5 8 28 29 21 8 79 46 6 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh 69 52 167 7 205 85 21 152 32 214 640 5 In-Process Volume [veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percenta 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Base Volume Adjustment 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h 96 5 47 1 2 8 11 289 127 295 301 1 Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Volumes
2 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
508
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 21 0 0 21 0 11 24 0 14 27 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 30 60 0 30 60 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 8 0 0 4 0 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Split Split Split Split Split Split Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 80
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
3 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
509
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 256.04 171.26 137.63 367.18 87.39 103.55 266.67 259.03 411.64 630.88 634.82 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 10.24 6.85 5.51 14.69 3.50 4.14 10.67 10.36 16.47 25.24 25.39 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 154.21 95.15 76.46 240.11 48.55 57.53 162.23 156.46 275.53 455.81 459.12 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 6.17 3.81 3.06 9.60 1.94 2.30 6.49 6.26 11.02 18.23 18.36 Critical Lane Group Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Lane Group LOS D D D E D E D D D D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 51.21 44.89 44.21 55.41 37.65 63.20 41.35 43.18 44.53 39.79 40.33 X, volume / capacity 0.83 0.57 0.57 0.89 0.31 0.77 0.71 0.72 0.93 0.92 0.92 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 6.26 1.91 1.20 12.74 0.31 11.98 1.25 2.92 5.08 9.81 10.27 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.20 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.24 0.24 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 44.95 42.98 43.00 42.67 37.33 51.23 40.10 40.26 39.45 29.98 30.06 c, Capacity [veh/h] 273 267 432 371 560 97 746 342 901 777 774 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1752 1711 2768 1835 2768 1752 3503 1604 3403 1840 1832 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.13 0.09 0.09 0.18 0.06 0.04 0.15 0.15 0.25 0.39 0.39 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.20 0.20 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.26 0.42 0.42 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 17 17 17 22 22 6 23 23 29 46 46 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 Lane Group L C R C R L C C L C C
Lane Group Calculations
4 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
510
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 51.21 44.89 44.33 55.41 55.41 37.65 63.20 41.49 43.18 44.53 40.06 40.33 Movement LOS D D D E E D E D D D D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 46.90 49.27 43.81 41.72
Approach LOS D D D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 43.80
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.742
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 29.76 29.76 29.76 29.76
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.984 2.516 3.095 3.323 Crosswalk LOS C B C C
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 425 425 450 525 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 24.81 24.81 24.03 21.76
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.593 2.395 2.028 3.430 Bicycle LOS B B B C
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 4 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
5 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
511
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.363
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 48.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Sellers Ave/Laurel Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocke 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pock 1 0 0 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Ave Sellers Ave Laurel Rd
Intersection Setup
6 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
512
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/ 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestria 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestri 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [ 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneu 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Pa No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [ve 0 196 273 679 295 50
Total 15-Minute Volume [ 0 49 68 170 74 13
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/ 0 196 273 679 295 50
Right Turn on Red Volum 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment 0 0 1 78 27 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh 0 48 48 401 218 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percenta 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Base Volume Adjustment 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h 0 148 224 200 50 50
Name Sellers Ave Sellers Ave Laurel Rd
Volumes
7 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
513
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 10 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 5 5 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 35 31 65 0 69 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 30 30 0 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 5 5 0 5 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 6 0 4 0
Control Type Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fixed time
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 100
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
8 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
514
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 174.39 346.22 468.15 191.89 62.35 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 6.98 13.85 18.73 7.68 2.49 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 96.88 223.60 321.19 107.05 34.64 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 3.88 8.94 12.85 4.28 1.39 Critical Lane Group No No No Yes Yes No
Lane Group LOS A E D D D C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.00 65.71 43.59 52.59 35.84 33.49 X, volume / capacity 0.00 0.38 0.45 0.74 0.25 0.09
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.00 2.16 2.40 5.44 0.49 0.33 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 0.00 63.54 41.19 47.15 35.35 33.16 c, Capacity [veh/h] 294 512 607 914 1197 550
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1603 3204 1683 2532 3113 1431 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.00 0.06 0.16 0.27 0.09 0.03 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.18 0.16 0.36 0.36 0.38 0.38
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 31 27 61 61 65 65
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 169 169 169 169 169 169
Lane Group L C C R L R
Lane Group Calculations
9 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
515
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 65.71 43.59 52.59 35.84 33.49 Movement LOS A E D D D C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 65.71 50.01 35.50
Approach LOS E D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 48.72
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.363
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 41.41 41.41 41.41
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.349 2.775 2.539 Crosswalk LOS B C B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 540 1220 1300 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 26.65 7.61 6.13
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.721 3.130 1.560 Bicycle LOS A C A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
10 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
516
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.333
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 10.2
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 3: Sellers Rd/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocke 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [ve 34 88 85 3 152 52 25 63 44 158 63 3 Total 15-Minute Volume [ 9 22 21 1 38 13 6 16 11 40 16 1 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/ 34 88 85 3 152 52 25 63 44 158 63 3 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh 1 1 49 0 8 37 12 0 3 120 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percenta 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h 33 86 36 3 142 15 13 63 41 38 63 3 Name
Volumes
11 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
517
Intersection LOS B
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 10.25
Approach LOS B B A B
Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.03 10.16 9.45 11.01
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 29.83 30.33 17.58 36.52 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 1.19 1.21 0.70 1.46
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.29 0.29 0.19 0.33
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 718 710 689 673
Lanes
Intersection Settings
12 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
518
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.794
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 52.6
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Main St/Laurel Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 49.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocke 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 305.00 100.00 1150.00 215.00 100.00 215.00 160.00 100.00 160.00 240.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pock 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Intersection Setup
13 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
519
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/ 0 1 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestria 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian 2 0 2 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestri 2 0 2 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Pa No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [ve 216 426 191 89 620 386 162 401 134 319 1173 261 Total 15-Minute Volume [ 54 107 48 22 155 97 41 100 34 80 293 65 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.6700 0.6700 0.6700 Total Hourly Volume [veh/ 173 341 153 71 496 309 146 361 121 214 786 175 Right Turn on Red Volum 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment 36 4 6 1 2 0 2 33 0 17 64 7
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh 30 39 6 9 29 295 18 222 20 21 360 64 In-Process Volume [veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percenta 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h 107 298 141 61 465 14 126 106 101 176 362 104 Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Volumes
14 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
520
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No Yes No Yes No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.1 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 18 0 0 24 0 0 26 0 0 30 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Split [s] 22 40 0 22 40 0 22 39 0 39 56 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.1 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 11 33 0 11 33 0 14 35 0 18 39 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 10 0 6 10 0 6 6 0 6 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 7 4 0 3 8 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lagging Force-Off
Offset [s] 108.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 140
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
15 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
521
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 381.71 351.07 323.27 146.96 366.15 531.30 268.10 243.48 169.20 467.21 680.61 283.18 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 15.27 14.04 12.93 5.88 14.65 21.25 10.72 9.74 6.77 18.69 27.22 11.33 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 251.63 227.41 205.68 81.64 239.30 372.94 163.31 144.80 94.00 320.43 497.68 174.77 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 10.07 9.10 8.23 3.27 9.57 14.92 6.53 5.79 3.76 12.82 19.91 6.99 Critical Lane Group Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Lane Group LOS F D D E D E E D D E D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 101.03 38.24 38.57 70.10 45.98 66.84 79.69 43.66 42.36 74.81 46.78 35.89 X, volume / capacity 0.95 0.50 0.50 0.81 0.61 0.87 0.88 0.44 0.33 0.94 0.95 0.48 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 40.47 2.69 3.01 5.30 2.77 19.67 17.93 0.13 0.18 19.21 2.24 0.24 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.17 0.04 0.04 0.21 0.04 0.04 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 60.56 35.55 35.57 64.79 43.21 47.17 61.76 43.54 42.18 55.60 44.55 35.65 c, Capacity [veh/h] 227 654 586 110 1011 446 185 908 404 341 1229 548 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1767 1855 1663 1767 3532 1557 1767 3532 1569 1767 3532 1577 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.12 0.18 0.18 0.05 0.18 0.25 0.09 0.11 0.09 0.18 0.33 0.17 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.13 0.35 0.35 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.10 0.26 0.26 0.19 0.35 0.35 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 18 49 49 9 40 40 15 36 36 27 49 49 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.40 3.40 2.00 3.10 3.10 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.40 5.40 4.00 5.10 5.10 C, Cycle Length [s] 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 Lane Group L C C L C R L C R L C R
Lane Group Calculations
16 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
522
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 101.03 38.32 38.57 70.10 45.98 66.84 79.69 43.66 42.36 74.81 46.78 35.89 Movement LOS F D D E D E E D D E D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 54.64 55.30 51.79 50.26
Approach LOS D E D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 52.60
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.794
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 1527.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 59.43 59.43 59.43 59.43
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.817 2.895 3.010 2.935 Crosswalk LOS C C C C
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 493 493 480 727 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 39.75 39.77 40.43 28.35
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.247 2.463 2.135 3.006 Bicycle LOS B B B C
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
17 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
523
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.433
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 11.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 7: Main St/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocke 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 95.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pock 0 1 1 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Intersection Setup
18 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
524
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/ 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestria 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestri 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [ 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneu 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Pa No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [ve 411 79 208 821 76 249
Total 15-Minute Volume [ 103 20 52 205 19 62
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9000 0.9000 0.7800 0.7800 0.8600 0.8600 Total Hourly Volume [veh/ 370 71 162 640 65 214
Right Turn on Red Volum 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment 8 0 0 24 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh 14 5 11 47 14 24
In-Process Volume [veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percenta 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30
Base Volume Adjustment 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h 348 66 151 569 51 190
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Volumes
19 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
525
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.4 3.4 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10 0 0 10 17 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.4 4.4 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 60 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 0 5 5 5 0
Lead / Lag - - Lead - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 6 0 5 2 4 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
20 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
526
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 56.30 20.29 71.43 53.66 17.69 76.46 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.25 0.81 2.86 2.15 0.71 3.06 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 31.28 11.27 39.69 29.81 9.83 42.48 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.25 0.45 1.59 1.19 0.39 1.70 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes No No Yes
Lane Group LOS B B B A B B
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 14.72 13.10 19.24 7.12 11.79 16.76 X, volume / capacity 0.64 0.28 0.77 0.54 0.20 0.75
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.08 0.52 4.51 0.30 0.27 3.47 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 13.64 12.58 14.74 6.83 11.52 13.29 c, Capacity [veh/h] 641 286 271 1527 371 331
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 3197 1427 1599 3197 1599 1427 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.13 0.06 0.13 0.26 0.05 0.17 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.20 0.20 0.17 0.48 0.23 0.23
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 7 7 6 18 9 9
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.40 3.40 2.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 5.40 5.40 4.00 5.40 5.40 5.40 C, Cycle Length [s] 37 37 37 37 37 37
Lane Group C R L C L R
Lane Group Calculations
21 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
527
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 14.72 13.10 19.24 7.12 11.79 16.76 Movement LOS B B B A B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 14.46 9.57 15.59
Approach LOS B A B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 11.93
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.433
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F F F
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 667 1333 667 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 20.00 5.00 20.00
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.964 2.409 1.560 Bicycle LOS A B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
22 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 2: 2 Background Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
528
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.676
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 36.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Sellers Rd/E Cypress Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 45.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocke 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 150.00 100.00 150.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 185.00 100.00 185.00 250.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pock 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Intersection Setup
1 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
529
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/ 0 0 1 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestria 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestri 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Pa No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [ve 186 138 936 22 63 288 197 1076 90 347 871 13 Total 15-Minute Volume [ 46 35 234 5 16 72 49 269 23 87 218 3 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.6500 0.6500 0.6500 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9100 0.9100 0.9100 Total Hourly Volume [veh/ 156 116 786 14 41 187 181 990 83 316 793 12 Right Turn on Red Volum 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment 16 16 1 10 16 52 53 148 15 1 94 11 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh 54 98 679 1 25 125 127 463 61 97 566 1 In-Process Volume [veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percenta 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Base Volume Adjustment 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h 86 2 106 3 0 10 1 379 7 218 133 0 Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Volumes
2 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
530
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 43 0 0 21 0 12 32 0 24 44 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 30 60 0 30 60 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 8 0 0 4 0 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Split Split Split Split Split Split Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 120
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
3 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
531
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 143.56 340.38 290.72 78.73 145.83 207.31 318.10 329.13 173.57 234.35 245.28 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 5.74 13.62 11.63 3.15 5.83 8.29 12.72 13.17 6.94 9.37 9.81 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 79.76 219.02 180.54 43.74 81.02 118.17 201.66 210.24 96.43 138.01 146.15 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 3.19 8.76 7.22 1.75 3.24 4.73 8.07 8.41 3.86 5.52 5.85 Critical Lane Group No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Lane Group LOS C D D D D D C D D C C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 27.75 40.76 35.82 38.29 43.62 47.29 34.81 36.83 42.88 31.73 32.41 X, volume / capacity 0.38 0.83 0.88 0.35 0.79 0.83 0.83 0.84 0.78 0.64 0.64 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.47 8.90 3.40 0.89 3.83 7.42 2.04 4.03 3.05 0.74 1.42 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.26 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 27.28 31.86 32.42 37.40 39.79 39.87 32.77 32.81 39.83 30.99 30.99 c, Capacity [veh/h] 494 466 781 240 365 237 930 468 444 913 476 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1752 1652 2768 1816 2768 1752 3503 1762 3403 3503 1826 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.11 0.23 0.25 0.05 0.10 0.11 0.22 0.22 0.10 0.17 0.17 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.27 0.27 0.13 0.26 0.26 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 27 27 27 12 12 13 25 25 12 25 25 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Lane Group L C R C R L C C L C C
Lane Group Calculations
4 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
532
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 27.75 40.76 37.09 38.29 38.29 43.62 47.29 35.38 36.83 42.88 31.96 32.41 Movement LOS C D D D D D D D D D C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 36.15 42.41 37.19 35.04
Approach LOS D D D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 36.72
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.676
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 49.50 49.50 49.50 49.50
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.943 2.548 3.173 3.402 Crosswalk LOS C B C C
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 650 283 433 633 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 27.34 44.20 36.84 28.02
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 3.639 2.175 2.309 2.237 Bicycle LOS D B B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 4 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
5 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
533
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.339
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 50.5
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Sellers Ave/Laurel Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocke 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pock 1 0 0 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Ave Sellers Ave Laurel Rd
Intersection Setup
6 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
534
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/ 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestria 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestri 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [ 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneu 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Pa No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [ve 0 380 209 185 670 25
Total 15-Minute Volume [ 0 95 52 46 168 6
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/ 0 380 209 185 670 25
Right Turn on Red Volum 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh 0 186 134 35 645 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percenta 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Base Volume Adjustment 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h 0 194 75 150 25 25
Name Sellers Ave Sellers Ave Laurel Rd
Volumes
7 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
535
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 10 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 5 5 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 35 31 65 0 69 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 30 30 0 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 5 5 0 5 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 6 0 4 0
Control Type Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fixed time
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 120
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
8 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
536
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 327.27 267.52 120.54 420.92 30.59 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 13.09 10.70 4.82 16.84 1.22 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 208.78 162.87 66.97 282.98 16.99 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 8.35 6.51 2.68 11.32 0.68 Critical Lane Group No No Yes No Yes No
Lane Group LOS A E D D D C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.00 77.05 40.95 37.73 42.67 32.72 X, volume / capacity 0.00 0.74 0.34 0.20 0.56 0.05
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.00 9.37 1.55 0.50 1.89 0.16 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 0.00 67.68 39.40 37.23 40.78 32.57 c, Capacity [veh/h] 294 512 607 914 1197 550
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1603 3204 1683 2532 3113 1431 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.07 0.22 0.02 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.18 0.16 0.36 0.36 0.38 0.38
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 31 27 61 61 65 65
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 169 169 169 169 169 169
Lane Group L C C R L R
Lane Group Calculations
9 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
537
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 77.05 40.95 37.73 42.67 32.72 Movement LOS A E D D D C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 77.05 39.44 42.31
Approach LOS E D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 50.53
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.339
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 51.34 51.34 51.34
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.396 2.784 2.515 Crosswalk LOS B C B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 450 1017 1083 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 36.04 14.50 12.60
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.873 2.210 1.560 Bicycle LOS A B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
10 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
538
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.775
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 19.1
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 3: Sellers Rd/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocke 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [ve 92 336 51 13 227 43 75 113 54 43 85 21 Total 15-Minute Volume [ 23 84 13 3 57 11 19 28 14 11 21 5 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/ 92 336 51 13 227 43 75 113 54 43 85 21 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh 4 132 0 0 77 21 41 0 2 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percenta 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h 88 203 51 13 149 22 34 113 52 43 85 21 Name
Volumes
11 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
539
Intersection LOS C
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 19.06
Approach LOS D B B B
Approach Delay [s/veh] 25.94 14.71 14.53 12.52
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 181.85 65.33 55.44 28.92 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 7.27 2.61 2.22 1.16
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.77 0.48 0.44 0.28
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 618 587 552 526
Lanes
Intersection Settings
12 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
540
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.658
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 52.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Main St/Laurel Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 49.21 0.00 0.00 49.21 0.00 0.00 49.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocke 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 305.00 100.00 1150.00 215.00 100.00 215.00 160.00 100.00 160.00 240.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pock 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Intersection Setup
13 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
541
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/ 0 0 0 1
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian 1 0 0 1
v_co, Outbound Pedestria 1 0 0 1
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian 0 0 1 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestri 1 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Pa No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [ve 216 463 149 144 458 388 311 888 214 68 338 88 Total 15-Minute Volume [ 54 116 37 36 114 97 78 222 53 17 84 22 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 0.9600 0.9600 0.9600 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 Total Hourly Volume [veh/ 192 412 133 127 403 341 299 852 205 60 297 77 Right Turn on Red Volum 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment 24 22 0 4 18 47 83 6 40 0 2 4
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh 32 45 14 28 59 265 76 659 42 2 50 16 In-Process Volume [veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percenta 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h 136 345 119 95 326 29 140 187 123 58 245 57 Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Volumes
14 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
542
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No Yes No Yes No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.1 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 18 0 0 24 0 0 26 0 0 30 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Split [s] 33 33 0 37 37 0 27 59 0 11 43 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.1 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 11 33 0 11 33 0 14 35 0 18 39 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 10 0 6 10 0 6 6 0 6 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 7 4 0 3 8 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lagging Force-Off
Offset [s] 108.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 140
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
15 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
543
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 320.53 289.60 271.54 224.36 224.56 402.41 586.60 540.02 259.24 114.07 236.75 125.80 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 12.82 11.58 10.86 8.97 8.98 16.10 23.46 21.60 10.37 4.56 9.47 5.03 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 203.54 179.68 165.91 130.64 130.78 268.13 400.81 380.15 156.62 63.37 139.80 69.89 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 8.14 7.19 6.64 5.23 5.23 10.73 16.03 15.21 6.26 2.53 5.59 2.80 Critical Lane Group Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Group LOS E C C E C D F D D E E D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 70.12 26.41 26.55 67.44 28.10 35.74 133.16 52.46 43.82 71.62 55.66 53.25 X, volume / capacity 0.91 0.38 0.38 0.86 0.31 0.59 1.08 0.94 0.51 0.79 0.62 0.37 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 10.48 1.29 1.41 5.03 0.56 3.94 74.67 2.28 0.36 5.85 0.43 0.35 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.09 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 59.65 25.12 25.13 62.41 27.54 31.80 58.49 50.18 43.46 65.77 55.23 52.90 c, Capacity [veh/h] 238 843 773 167 1464 653 288 943 420 86 546 241 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1767 1855 1701 1767 3532 1577 1767 3532 1575 1767 3532 1556 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.12 0.17 0.17 0.08 0.13 0.25 0.18 0.25 0.14 0.04 0.10 0.06 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.14 0.45 0.45 0.09 0.41 0.41 0.16 0.27 0.27 0.05 0.15 0.15 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 19 64 64 13 58 58 23 37 37 7 22 22 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.40 3.40 2.00 3.10 3.10 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.40 5.40 4.00 5.10 5.10 C, Cycle Length [s] 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 Lane Group L C C L C R L C R L C R
Lane Group Calculations
16 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
544
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 70.12 26.45 26.55 67.44 28.10 35.74 133.16 52.46 43.82 71.62 55.66 53.25 Movement LOS E C C E C D F D D E E D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 37.86 36.82 68.92 57.43
Approach LOS D D E E
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 51.96
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.658
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 5111.22 0.00 0.00 2680.42 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 59.43 59.43 59.43 59.43
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.729 2.875 2.984 2.792 Crosswalk LOS B C C C
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 393 450 766 541 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 45.20 42.04 26.66 37.25
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.243 2.376 2.725 1.967 Bicycle LOS B B B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
17 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
545
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.323
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 7.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 7: Main St/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocke 0 0 0 1 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 95.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pock 0 1 1 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Intersection Setup
18 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
546
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/ 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestria 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestri 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [ 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneu 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Pa No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [ve 683 121 154 541 11 19
Total 15-Minute Volume [ 171 30 38 135 3 5
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9400 0.9400 0.9100 0.9100 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/ 642 114 140 492 10 18
Right Turn on Red Volum 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment 26 0 0 16 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh 54 16 28 31 9 16
In-Process Volume [veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percenta 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30
Base Volume Adjustment 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h 562 98 112 445 1 2
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Volumes
19 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
547
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.4 3.4 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10 0 0 10 17 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.4 4.4 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 60 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 0 5 5 5 0
Lead / Lag - - Lead - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 6 0 5 2 4 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
20 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
548
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 45.09 14.02 43.32 0.98 3.25 6.38 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.80 0.56 1.73 0.04 0.13 0.26 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 25.05 7.79 24.07 0.55 1.80 3.54 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.00 0.31 0.96 0.02 0.07 0.14 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes No No Yes
Lane Group LOS A A B A B B
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 9.11 7.50 18.32 3.03 14.87 17.40 X, volume / capacity 0.66 0.26 0.77 0.29 0.18 0.35
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.73 0.30 6.11 0.08 1.43 3.87 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 8.39 7.20 12.21 2.95 13.44 13.53
c, Capacity [veh/h] 1035 462 200 1879 60 54
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 3197 1427 1599 3197 1599 1427 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.21 0.08 0.10 0.17 0.01 0.01 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.32 0.32 0.12 0.59 0.04 0.04
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 9 9 4 17 1 1
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.40 3.40 2.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 5.40 5.40 4.00 5.40 5.40 5.40 C, Cycle Length [s] 29 29 29 29 29 29
Lane Group C R L C L R
Lane Group Calculations
21 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
549
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 9.11 7.50 18.32 3.03 14.87 17.40 Movement LOS A A B A B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 8.87 6.42 16.47
Approach LOS A A B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 7.91
Intersection LOS A
Intersection V/C 0.323
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F F F
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 667 1333 667 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 20.00 5.00 20.00
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.223 2.133 1.560 Bicycle LOS B B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
22 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers TIS
Scenario 4: 4 Background Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
550
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
46 Appendix E
Background plus Project Conditions LOS Reports

551
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.751
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 45.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Sellers Rd/E Cypress Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 45.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 150.00 100.00 150.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 185.00 100.00 185.00 250.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Intersection Setup
1 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
552
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 242 87 314 19 312 175 75 570 212 840 1410 17 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 60 22 79 5 78 44 19 143 53 210 353 4 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.7700 0.7700 0.7700 0.6900 0.6900 0.6900 0.8100 0.8100 0.8100 0.7000 0.7000 0.7000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 186 67 242 13 215 121 61 462 172 588 987 12 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 9 10 27 5 8 28 29 21 8 79 46 6 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 69 52 167 7 205 85 21 152 32 214 640 5 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 96 5 47 1 2 8 11 289 127 295 301 1 Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Volumes
2 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
553
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 21 0 0 21 0 11 24 0 14 27 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 30 60 0 30 60 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 8 0 0 4 0 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Split Split Split Split Split Split Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 80
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
3 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
554
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 278.89 175.52 141.59 382.10 90.98 107.11 276.87 268.12 429.03 658.94 663.12 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 11.16 7.02 5.66 15.28 3.64 4.28 11.07 10.72 17.16 26.36 26.52 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 171.50 97.51 78.66 251.95 50.55 59.51 169.97 163.32 289.50 479.40 482.92 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 6.86 3.90 3.15 10.08 2.02 2.38 6.80 6.53 11.58 19.18 19.32 Critical Lane Group Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Lane Group LOS D D D E D E D D D D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 52.67 45.23 44.66 58.27 39.01 65.07 42.64 44.50 46.94 41.90 42.48 X, volume / capacity 0.84 0.54 0.55 0.90 0.31 0.77 0.71 0.73 0.94 0.92 0.93 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 6.59 1.63 1.03 14.05 0.32 12.10 1.26 2.94 5.83 10.75 11.24 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.22 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.26 0.26 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 46.08 43.60 43.63 44.22 38.69 52.97 41.39 41.56 41.11 31.15 31.24 c, Capacity [veh/h] 287 281 454 370 558 97 751 343 891 774 771 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1752 1710 2768 1835 2768 1752 3503 1600 3403 1840 1832 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.14 0.09 0.09 0.18 0.06 0.04 0.15 0.16 0.25 0.39 0.39 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.20 0.20 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.26 0.42 0.42 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 19 19 19 23 23 6 24 24 30 48 48 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 Lane Group L C R C R L C C L C C
Lane Group Calculations
4 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
555
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 52.67 45.23 44.76 58.27 58.27 39.01 65.07 42.76 44.50 46.94 42.18 42.48 Movement LOS D D D E E D E D D D D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 47.81 51.61 45.14 43.95
Approach LOS D D D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 45.68
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.751
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 29.76 29.76 29.76 29.76
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.990 2.516 3.100 3.323 Crosswalk LOS C B C C
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 425 425 450 525 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 24.81 24.81 24.03 21.76
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.621 2.395 2.031 3.430 Bicycle LOS B B B C
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 4 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
5 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
556
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.385
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 49.2
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Sellers Ave/Laurel Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Ave Laurel Rd
Intersection Setup
6 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
557
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 23 210 279 689 308 60
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 6 53 70 172 77 15
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 23 210 279 689 308 60
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 23 13 5 0 0 10
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 1 2 88 40 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 48 48 401 218 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 148 224 200 50 50
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Ave Laurel Rd
Volumes
7 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
558
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 10 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 5 5 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 35 31 65 0 69 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 30 30 0 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 5 5 0 5 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 6 0 4 0
Control Type Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fixed time
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 100
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
8 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
559
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 38.18 188.02 353.89 476.86 199.21 75.40 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.53 7.52 14.16 19.07 7.97 3.02 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 21.21 104.46 229.63 328.29 112.31 41.89 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.85 4.18 9.19 13.13 4.49 1.68 Critical Lane Group Yes No No Yes Yes No
Lane Group LOS E E D D D C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 57.68 66.26 43.86 53.15 36.03 33.80 X, volume / capacity 0.08 0.41 0.46 0.75 0.26 0.11
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.52 2.42 2.49 5.74 0.52 0.40 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 57.16 63.84 41.37 47.41 35.51 33.40 c, Capacity [veh/h] 294 512 607 914 1197 550
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1603 3204 1683 2532 3113 1431 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.01 0.07 0.17 0.27 0.10 0.04 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.18 0.16 0.36 0.36 0.38 0.38
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 31 27 61 61 65 65
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 169 169 169 169 169 169
Lane Group L C C R L R
Lane Group Calculations
9 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
560
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 57.68 66.26 43.86 53.15 36.03 33.80 Movement LOS E E D D D C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 65.42 50.47 35.67
Approach LOS E D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 49.22
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.385
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 41.41 41.41 41.41
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.370 2.789 2.552 Crosswalk LOS B C B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 540 1220 1300 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 26.65 7.61 6.13
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.752 3.157 1.560 Bicycle LOS A C A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
10 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
561
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.335
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 10.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 3: Sellers Rd/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 34 89 85 3 153 59 25 63 44 158 63 3 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 9 22 21 1 38 15 6 16 11 40 16 1 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 34 89 85 3 153 59 25 63 44 158 63 3 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 1 1 49 0 8 37 12 0 3 120 0 0 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 33 86 36 3 142 15 13 63 41 38 63 3 Name
Volumes
11 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
562
Intersection LOS B
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 10.31
Approach LOS B B A B
Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.08 10.26 9.50 11.06
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 30.17 31.91 17.69 36.77 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 1.21 1.28 0.71 1.47
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.29 0.30 0.19 0.33
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 715 710 686 669
Lanes
Intersection Settings
12 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
563
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.031
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 11.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 4: Sellers Rd/Project Access 1
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 1
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 215 282 7 18 4
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 54 71 2 5 1
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 215 282 7 18 4
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 18 8 7 18 4
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 1 2 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 48 48 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 148 224 0 0 0
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 1
Volumes
13 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
564
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.46
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 11.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.75 2.75 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.38 9.32 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
14 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
565
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.030
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 11.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: Sellers Rd/Project Access 2
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 2
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1 197 278 8 18 4
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 49 70 2 5 1
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 1 197 278 8 18 4
Other Volume [veh/h] 1 0 4 8 18 4
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 1 2 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 48 48 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 148 224 0 0 0
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 2
Volumes
15 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
566
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.49
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.04 0.00 10.93
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.00 2.71 2.71 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.29 9.30 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
16 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
567
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.804
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 53.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Main St/Laurel Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 49.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 305.00 100.00 1150.00 215.00 100.00 215.00 160.00 100.00 160.00 240.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Intersection Setup
17 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
568
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 1 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 2 0 2 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 2 0 2 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 216 426 194 89 620 386 162 410 134 319 1207 261 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 54 107 48 22 155 97 41 103 34 80 302 65 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.6700 0.6700 0.6700 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 173 341 155 71 496 309 146 369 121 214 809 175 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 23 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 36 4 6 1 2 0 2 33 0 17 64 7 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 30 39 6 9 29 295 18 222 20 21 360 64 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 107 298 141 61 465 14 126 106 101 176 362 104 Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Volumes
18 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
569
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No Yes No Yes No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.1 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 18 0 0 24 0 0 26 0 0 30 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Split [s] 22 40 0 22 40 0 22 39 0 39 56 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.1 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 11 33 0 11 33 0 14 35 0 18 39 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 10 0 6 10 0 6 6 0 6 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 7 4 0 3 8 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lagging Force-Off
Offset [s] 108.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 140
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
19 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
570
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 381.71 358.31 329.63 146.96 371.40 548.62 268.10 245.64 166.83 467.21 697.12 279.51 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 15.27 14.33 13.19 5.88 14.86 21.94 10.72 9.83 6.67 18.69 27.88 11.18 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 251.63 233.11 210.63 81.64 243.45 387.25 163.31 146.42 92.68 320.43 511.64 171.97 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 10.07 9.32 8.43 3.27 9.74 15.49 6.53 5.86 3.71 12.82 20.47 6.88 Critical Lane Group Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Lane Group LOS F D D E D E E D D E D C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 101.03 39.53 39.90 70.10 47.43 71.97 79.69 42.72 41.32 74.81 46.25 34.89 X, volume / capacity 0.95 0.51 0.51 0.81 0.63 0.89 0.88 0.44 0.32 0.94 0.96 0.46 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 40.47 2.94 3.29 5.30 3.11 23.59 17.93 0.12 0.16 19.21 2.30 0.22 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.17 0.04 0.04 0.21 0.04 0.04 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 60.56 36.60 36.61 64.79 44.32 48.38 61.76 42.60 41.16 55.60 43.95 34.67 c, Capacity [veh/h] 227 637 571 110 979 432 185 941 418 341 1261 563 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1767 1855 1661 1767 3532 1557 1767 3532 1570 1767 3532 1577 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.12 0.18 0.18 0.05 0.18 0.25 0.09 0.12 0.09 0.18 0.34 0.17 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.13 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.10 0.27 0.27 0.19 0.36 0.36 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 18 48 48 9 39 39 15 37 37 27 50 50 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.40 3.40 2.00 3.10 3.10 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.40 5.40 4.00 5.10 5.10 C, Cycle Length [s] 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 Lane Group L C C L C R L C R L C R
Lane Group Calculations
20 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
571
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 101.03 39.62 39.90 70.10 47.43 71.97 79.69 42.72 41.32 74.81 46.25 34.89 Movement LOS F D D E D E E D D E D C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 55.55 57.92 50.94 49.69
Approach LOS E E D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 53.03
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.804
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 1527.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 59.43 59.43 59.43 59.43
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.817 2.895 3.019 2.944 Crosswalk LOS C C C C
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 493 493 480 727 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 39.75 39.77 40.43 28.35
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.249 2.463 2.142 3.034 Bicycle LOS B B B C
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
21 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
572
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.434
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 12.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 7: Main St/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 95.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 1 1 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Intersection Setup
22 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
573
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 413 79 208 821 84 249
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 103 20 52 205 21 62
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9000 0.9000 0.7800 0.7800 0.8600 0.8600 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 372 71 162 640 72 214
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 2 0 0 0 7 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 8 0 0 24 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 14 5 11 47 14 24
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 348 66 151 569 51 190
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Volumes
23 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
574
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.4 3.4 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10 0 0 10 17 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.4 4.4 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 60 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 0 5 5 5 0
Lead / Lag - - Lead - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 6 0 5 2 4 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
24 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
575
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 56.85 20.36 71.75 54.05 19.75 76.51 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.27 0.81 2.87 2.16 0.79 3.06 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 31.58 11.31 39.86 30.03 10.97 42.50 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.26 0.45 1.59 1.20 0.44 1.70 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes No No Yes
Lane Group LOS B B B A B B
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 14.76 13.12 19.30 7.14 11.90 16.71 X, volume / capacity 0.64 0.28 0.77 0.54 0.23 0.75
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.08 0.51 4.51 0.30 0.30 3.41 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 13.68 12.61 14.78 6.84 11.59 13.30 c, Capacity [veh/h] 642 287 271 1528 372 332
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 3197 1427 1599 3197 1599 1427 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.13 0.06 0.13 0.26 0.05 0.17 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.20 0.20 0.17 0.48 0.23 0.23
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 7 7 6 18 9 9
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.40 3.40 2.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 5.40 5.40 4.00 5.40 5.40 5.40 C, Cycle Length [s] 37 37 37 37 37 37
Lane Group C R L C L R
Lane Group Calculations
25 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
576
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 14.76 13.12 19.30 7.14 11.90 16.71 Movement LOS B B B A B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 14.50 9.60 15.50
Approach LOS B A B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 11.96
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.434
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F F F
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 667 1333 667 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 20.00 5.00 20.00
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.966 2.409 1.560 Bicycle LOS A B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
26 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
577
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.679
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 37.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Sellers Rd/E Cypress Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 45.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 150.00 100.00 150.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 185.00 100.00 185.00 250.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Intersection Setup
1 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
578
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 1 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 196 138 936 22 63 288 197 1076 105 347 871 13 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 49 35 234 5 16 72 49 269 26 87 218 3 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.6500 0.6500 0.6500 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9100 0.9100 0.9100 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 165 116 786 14 41 187 181 990 97 316 793 12 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 16 16 1 10 16 52 53 148 15 1 94 11 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 54 98 679 1 25 125 127 463 61 97 566 1 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 86 2 106 3 0 10 1 379 7 218 133 0 Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Volumes
2 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
579
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 43 0 0 21 0 12 32 0 24 44 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 30 60 0 30 60 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 8 0 0 4 0 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Split Split Split Split Split Split Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 120
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
3 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
580
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 154.50 345.10 294.18 79.72 147.69 209.30 324.85 334.53 175.80 235.58 246.46 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 6.18 13.80 11.77 3.19 5.91 8.37 12.99 13.38 7.03 9.42 9.86 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 85.83 222.72 183.20 44.29 82.05 119.62 206.90 214.45 97.66 138.93 147.03 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 3.43 8.91 7.33 1.77 3.28 4.78 8.28 8.58 3.91 5.56 5.88 Critical Lane Group No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Lane Group LOS C D D D D D C D D C C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 28.32 41.48 36.31 38.71 44.11 47.80 34.99 37.05 43.36 31.74 32.39 X, volume / capacity 0.40 0.83 0.88 0.36 0.79 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.78 0.63 0.63 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.52 9.22 3.49 0.90 3.88 7.50 2.04 4.07 3.09 0.71 1.35 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.27 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 27.80 32.26 32.82 37.81 40.23 40.30 32.95 32.99 40.27 31.03 31.03 c, Capacity [veh/h] 493 465 779 239 364 236 942 471 443 925 482 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1752 1652 2768 1816 2768 1752 3503 1751 3403 3503 1826 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.11 0.23 0.25 0.05 0.10 0.11 0.22 0.23 0.10 0.17 0.17 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.27 0.27 0.13 0.26 0.26 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 27 27 27 13 13 13 26 26 12 25 25 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Lane Group L C R C R L C C L C C
Lane Group Calculations
4 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
581
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 28.32 41.48 37.64 38.71 38.71 44.11 47.80 35.54 37.05 43.36 31.96 32.39 Movement LOS C D D D D D D D D D C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 36.66 42.88 37.41 35.17
Approach LOS D D D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 37.02
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.679
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 49.50 49.50 49.50 49.50
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.950 2.548 3.179 3.402 Crosswalk LOS C B C C
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 650 283 433 633 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 27.34 44.20 36.84 28.02
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 3.655 2.175 2.318 2.237 Bicycle LOS D B B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 4 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
5 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
582
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.362
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 50.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Sellers Ave/Laurel Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Ave Laurel Rd
Intersection Setup
6 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
583
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 16 390 225 191 680 59
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 4 98 56 48 170 15
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 16 390 225 191 680 59
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 16 9 15 0 0 34
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 1 1 6 10 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 186 134 35 645 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 194 75 150 25 25
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Ave Laurel Rd
Volumes
7 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
584
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 10 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 5 5 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 35 31 65 0 69 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 30 30 0 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 5 5 0 5 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 6 0 4 0
Control Type Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fixed time
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 120
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
8 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
585
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 26.41 336.68 286.71 124.78 427.78 74.09 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.06 13.47 11.47 4.99 17.11 2.96 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 14.67 216.13 177.47 69.32 288.50 41.16 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.59 8.65 7.10 2.77 11.54 1.65 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes No Yes No
Lane Group LOS E E D D D C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 57.26 78.19 41.57 37.84 42.90 33.77 X, volume / capacity 0.05 0.76 0.37 0.21 0.57 0.11
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.35 10.26 1.73 0.52 1.96 0.39 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 56.91 67.92 39.83 37.32 40.94 33.38 c, Capacity [veh/h] 294 512 607 914 1197 550
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1603 3204 1683 2532 3113 1431 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.01 0.12 0.13 0.08 0.22 0.04 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.18 0.16 0.36 0.36 0.38 0.38
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 31 27 61 61 65 65
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 169 169 169 169 169 169
Lane Group L C C R L R
Lane Group Calculations
9 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
586
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 57.26 78.19 41.57 37.84 42.90 33.77 Movement LOS E E D D D C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 77.36 39.86 42.17
Approach LOS E D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 50.71
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.362
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 51.34 51.34 51.34
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.427 2.798 2.530 Crosswalk LOS B C B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 450 1017 1083 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 36.04 14.50 12.60
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.895 2.246 1.560 Bicycle LOS A B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
10 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
587
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.778
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 19.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 3: Sellers Rd/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 92 337 51 13 228 47 75 113 54 43 85 21 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 23 84 13 3 57 12 19 28 14 11 21 5 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 92 337 51 13 228 47 75 113 54 43 85 21 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 4 132 0 0 77 21 41 0 2 0 0 0 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 88 203 51 13 149 22 34 113 52 43 85 21 Name
Volumes
11 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
588
Intersection LOS C
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 19.26
Approach LOS D B B B
Approach Delay [s/veh] 26.29 14.91 14.60 12.58
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 184.10 67.46 55.77 29.07 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 7.36 2.70 2.23 1.16
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.78 0.49 0.44 0.28
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 616 586 549 524
Lanes
Intersection Settings
12 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
589
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.024
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 11.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 4: Sellers Rd/Project Access 1
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 1
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 393 234 25 13 3
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 98 59 6 3 1
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 393 234 25 13 3
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 12 24 25 13 3
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 1 1 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 186 134 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 194 75 0 0 0
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 1
Volumes
13 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
590
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.27
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 11.31
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.10 2.10 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.80 9.19 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
14 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
591
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.021
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 11.5
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: Sellers Rd/Project Access 2
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1 381 213 24 12 2
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 95 53 6 3 1
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 1 381 213 24 12 2
Other Volume [veh/h] 1 0 3 24 12 2
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 1 1 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 186 134 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 194 75 0 0 0
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd
Volumes
15 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
592
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.26
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.02 0.00 11.19
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.00 1.80 1.80 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.54 9.10 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
16 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
593
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.666
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 52.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Main St/Laurel Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 49.21 0.00 0.00 49.21 0.00 0.00 49.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 305.00 100.00 1150.00 215.00 100.00 215.00 160.00 100.00 160.00 240.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Intersection Setup
17 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
594
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 1
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 1 0 0 1
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 1 0 0 1
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 1 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 1 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 216 463 157 144 458 388 311 916 214 68 356 88 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 54 116 39 36 114 97 78 229 53 17 89 22 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 0.9600 0.9600 0.9600 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 192 412 140 127 403 341 299 879 205 60 313 77 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 16 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 24 22 0 4 18 47 83 6 40 0 2 4 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 32 45 14 28 59 265 76 659 42 2 50 16 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 136 345 119 95 326 29 140 187 123 58 245 57 Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Volumes
18 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
595
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No Yes No Yes No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.1 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 18 0 0 24 0 0 26 0 0 30 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Split [s] 33 33 0 37 37 0 27 59 0 11 43 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.1 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 11 33 0 11 33 0 14 35 0 18 39 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 10 0 6 10 0 6 6 0 6 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 7 4 0 3 8 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lagging Force-Off
Offset [s] 108.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 140
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
19 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
596
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 320.53 298.09 278.69 224.36 227.43 408.43 586.60 553.69 256.62 114.07 245.75 124.43 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 12.82 11.92 11.15 8.97 9.10 16.34 23.46 22.15 10.26 4.56 9.83 4.98 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 203.54 186.20 171.35 130.64 132.90 272.95 400.81 391.45 154.65 63.37 146.50 69.13 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 8.14 7.45 6.85 5.23 5.32 10.92 16.03 15.66 6.19 2.53 5.86 2.77 Critical Lane Group Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Group LOS E C C E C D F D D E D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 70.12 27.32 27.47 67.44 28.88 36.87 133.16 51.90 42.85 71.62 54.92 52.21 X, volume / capacity 0.91 0.39 0.39 0.86 0.32 0.61 1.08 0.94 0.49 0.79 0.62 0.35 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 10.48 1.39 1.52 5.03 0.59 4.21 74.67 2.28 0.33 5.85 0.41 0.30 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.09 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 59.65 25.94 25.95 62.41 28.30 32.66 58.49 49.62 42.53 65.77 54.51 51.91 c, Capacity [veh/h] 238 828 757 167 1436 641 288 971 433 86 575 253 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1767 1855 1695 1767 3532 1577 1767 3532 1575 1767 3532 1556 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.12 0.17 0.17 0.08 0.13 0.25 0.18 0.26 0.14 0.04 0.10 0.06 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.14 0.45 0.45 0.09 0.41 0.41 0.16 0.28 0.28 0.05 0.16 0.16 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 19 62 62 13 57 57 23 39 39 7 23 23 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.40 3.40 2.00 3.10 3.10 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.40 5.40 4.00 5.10 5.10 C, Cycle Length [s] 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 Lane Group L C C L C R L C R L C R
Lane Group Calculations
20 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
597
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 70.12 27.37 27.47 67.44 28.88 36.87 133.16 51.90 42.85 71.62 54.92 52.21 Movement LOS E C C E C D F D D E D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 38.43 37.62 68.10 56.67
Approach LOS D D E E
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 52.00
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.666
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 5111.22 0.00 0.00 2620.88 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 59.43 59.43 59.43 59.43
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.731 2.875 2.994 2.802 Crosswalk LOS B C C C
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 393 450 766 541 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 45.20 42.04 26.66 37.25
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.249 2.376 2.748 1.982 Bicycle LOS B B B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
21 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
598
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.325
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 8.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 7: Main St/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 95.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 1 1 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Intersection Setup
22 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
599
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 690 121 154 541 15 19
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 173 30 38 135 4 5
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9400 0.9400 0.9100 0.9100 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 649 114 140 492 14 18
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 7 0 0 0 4 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 26 0 0 16 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 54 16 28 31 9 16
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 562 98 112 445 1 2
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Volumes
23 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
600
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.4 3.4 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10 0 0 10 17 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.4 4.4 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 60 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 0 5 5 5 0
Lead / Lag - - Lead - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 6 0 5 2 4 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
24 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
601
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 46.69 14.31 43.89 0.98 4.39 6.04 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.87 0.57 1.76 0.04 0.18 0.24 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 25.94 7.95 24.38 0.55 2.44 3.36 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.04 0.32 0.98 0.02 0.10 0.13 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes No No Yes
Lane Group LOS A A B A B B
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 9.20 7.55 18.44 3.07 15.16 16.53 X, volume / capacity 0.66 0.26 0.77 0.29 0.22 0.32
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.73 0.30 6.09 0.08 1.65 2.96 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 8.47 7.26 12.35 2.99 13.51 13.56
c, Capacity [veh/h] 1040 464 200 1878 67 60
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 3197 1427 1599 3197 1599 1427 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.22 0.08 0.10 0.17 0.01 0.01 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.32 0.32 0.12 0.59 0.04 0.04
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 9 9 4 17 1 1
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.40 3.40 2.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 5.40 5.40 4.00 5.40 5.40 5.40 C, Cycle Length [s] 29 29 29 29 29 29
Lane Group C R L C L R
Lane Group Calculations
25 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
602
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 9.20 7.55 18.44 3.07 15.16 16.53 Movement LOS A A B A B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 8.96 6.47 15.92
Approach LOS A A B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 7.99
Intersection LOS A
Intersection V/C 0.325
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F F F
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 667 1333 667 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 20.00 5.00 20.00
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.229 2.133 1.560 Bicycle LOS B B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
26 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
603
Sellers Avenue TIS - Traffic Impact Analysis
47 Appendix F
Background plus Project Conditions Mitigated LOS Reports 604
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.751
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 45.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Sellers Rd/E Cypress Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 45.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 150.00 100.00 150.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 185.00 100.00 185.00 250.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Intersection Setup
1 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
605
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 242 87 314 19 312 175 75 570 212 840 1410 17 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 60 22 79 5 78 44 19 143 53 210 353 4 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.7700 0.7700 0.7700 0.6900 0.6900 0.6900 0.8100 0.8100 0.8100 0.7000 0.7000 0.7000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 186 67 242 13 215 121 61 462 172 588 987 12 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 9 10 27 5 8 28 29 21 8 79 46 6 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 69 52 167 7 205 85 21 152 32 214 640 5 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 96 5 47 1 2 8 11 289 127 295 301 1 Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Volumes
2 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
606
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 21 0 0 21 0 11 24 0 14 27 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 30 60 0 30 60 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 8 0 0 4 0 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Split Split Split Split Split Split Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 80
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
3 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
607
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 278.89 175.52 141.59 382.10 90.98 107.11 276.87 268.12 429.03 658.94 663.12 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 11.16 7.02 5.66 15.28 3.64 4.28 11.07 10.72 17.16 26.36 26.52 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 171.50 97.51 78.66 251.95 50.55 59.51 169.97 163.32 289.50 479.40 482.92 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 6.86 3.90 3.15 10.08 2.02 2.38 6.80 6.53 11.58 19.18 19.32 Critical Lane Group Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Lane Group LOS D D D E D E D D D D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 52.67 45.23 44.66 58.27 39.01 65.07 42.64 44.50 46.94 41.90 42.48 X, volume / capacity 0.84 0.54 0.55 0.90 0.31 0.77 0.71 0.73 0.94 0.92 0.93 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 6.59 1.63 1.03 14.05 0.32 12.10 1.26 2.94 5.83 10.75 11.24 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.22 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.26 0.26 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 46.08 43.60 43.63 44.22 38.69 52.97 41.39 41.56 41.11 31.15 31.24 c, Capacity [veh/h] 287 281 454 370 558 97 751 343 891 774 771 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1752 1710 2768 1835 2768 1752 3503 1600 3403 1840 1832 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.14 0.09 0.09 0.18 0.06 0.04 0.15 0.16 0.25 0.39 0.39 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.20 0.20 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.26 0.42 0.42 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 19 19 19 23 23 6 24 24 30 48 48 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 Lane Group L C R C R L C C L C C
Lane Group Calculations
4 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
608
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 52.67 45.23 44.76 58.27 58.27 39.01 65.07 42.76 44.50 46.94 42.18 42.48 Movement LOS D D D E E D E D D D D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 47.81 51.61 45.14 43.95
Approach LOS D D D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 45.68
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.751
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 29.76 29.76 29.76 29.76
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.990 2.516 3.100 3.323 Crosswalk LOS C B C C
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 425 425 450 525 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 24.81 24.81 24.03 21.76
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.621 2.395 2.031 3.430 Bicycle LOS B B B C
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 4 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
5 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
609
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.385
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 49.2
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Sellers Ave/Laurel Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Ave Laurel Rd
Intersection Setup
6 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
610
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 23 210 279 689 308 60
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 6 53 70 172 77 15
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 23 210 279 689 308 60
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 23 13 5 0 0 10
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 1 2 88 40 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 48 48 401 218 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 148 224 200 50 50
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Ave Laurel Rd
Volumes
7 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
611
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 10 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 5 5 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 35 31 65 0 69 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 30 30 0 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 5 5 0 5 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 6 0 4 0
Control Type Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fixed time
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 100
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
8 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
612
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 38.18 188.02 353.89 476.86 199.21 75.40 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.53 7.52 14.16 19.07 7.97 3.02 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 21.21 104.46 229.63 328.29 112.31 41.89 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.85 4.18 9.19 13.13 4.49 1.68 Critical Lane Group Yes No No Yes Yes No
Lane Group LOS E E D D D C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 57.68 66.26 43.86 53.15 36.03 33.80 X, volume / capacity 0.08 0.41 0.46 0.75 0.26 0.11
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.52 2.42 2.49 5.74 0.52 0.40 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 57.16 63.84 41.37 47.41 35.51 33.40 c, Capacity [veh/h] 294 512 607 914 1197 550
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1603 3204 1683 2532 3113 1431 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.01 0.07 0.17 0.27 0.10 0.04 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.18 0.16 0.36 0.36 0.38 0.38
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 31 27 61 61 65 65
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 169 169 169 169 169 169
Lane Group L C C R L R
Lane Group Calculations
9 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
613
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 57.68 66.26 43.86 53.15 36.03 33.80 Movement LOS E E D D D C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 65.42 50.47 35.67
Approach LOS E D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 49.22
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.385
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 41.41 41.41 41.41
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.370 2.789 2.552 Crosswalk LOS B C B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 540 1220 1300 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 26.65 7.61 6.13
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.752 3.157 1.560 Bicycle LOS A C A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
10 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
614
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.335
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 10.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 3: Sellers Rd/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 34 89 85 3 153 59 25 63 44 158 63 3 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 9 22 21 1 38 15 6 16 11 40 16 1 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 34 89 85 3 153 59 25 63 44 158 63 3 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 1 1 49 0 8 37 12 0 3 120 0 0 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 33 86 36 3 142 15 13 63 41 38 63 3 Name
Volumes
11 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
615
Intersection LOS B
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 10.31
Approach LOS B B A B
Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.08 10.26 9.50 11.06
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 30.17 31.91 17.69 36.77 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 1.21 1.28 0.71 1.47
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.29 0.30 0.19 0.33
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 715 710 686 669
Lanes
Intersection Settings
12 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
616
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.031
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 11.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 4: Sellers Rd/Project Access 1
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 1
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 215 282 7 18 4
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 54 71 2 5 1
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 215 282 7 18 4
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 18 8 7 18 4
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 1 2 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 48 48 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 148 224 0 0 0
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 1
Volumes
13 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
617
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.46
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 11.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.75 2.75 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.38 9.32 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
14 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
618
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.030
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 11.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: Sellers Rd/Project Access 2
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 2
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1 197 278 8 18 4
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 49 70 2 5 1
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 1 197 278 8 18 4
Other Volume [veh/h] 1 0 4 8 18 4
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 1 2 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 48 48 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 148 224 0 0 0
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 2
Volumes
15 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
619
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.49
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.04 0.00 10.93
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.00 2.71 2.71 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.29 9.30 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
16 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
620
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.804
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 53.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Main St/Laurel Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 49.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 305.00 100.00 1150.00 215.00 100.00 215.00 160.00 100.00 160.00 240.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Intersection Setup
17 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
621
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 1 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 2 0 2 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 2 0 2 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 216 426 194 89 620 386 162 410 134 319 1207 261 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 54 107 48 22 155 97 41 103 34 80 302 65 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.6700 0.6700 0.6700 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 173 341 155 71 496 309 146 369 121 214 809 175 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 23 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 36 4 6 1 2 0 2 33 0 17 64 7 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 30 39 6 9 29 295 18 222 20 21 360 64 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 107 298 141 61 465 14 126 106 101 176 362 104 Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Volumes
18 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
622
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No Yes No Yes No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.1 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 18 0 0 24 0 0 26 0 0 30 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Split [s] 22 40 0 22 40 0 22 39 0 39 56 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.1 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 11 33 0 11 33 0 14 35 0 18 39 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 10 0 6 10 0 6 6 0 6 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 7 4 0 3 8 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lagging Force-Off
Offset [s] 108.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 140
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
19 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
623
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 381.71 358.31 329.63 146.96 371.40 548.62 268.10 245.64 166.83 467.21 697.12 279.51 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 15.27 14.33 13.19 5.88 14.86 21.94 10.72 9.83 6.67 18.69 27.88 11.18 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 251.63 233.11 210.63 81.64 243.45 387.25 163.31 146.42 92.68 320.43 511.64 171.97 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 10.07 9.32 8.43 3.27 9.74 15.49 6.53 5.86 3.71 12.82 20.47 6.88 Critical Lane Group Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Lane Group LOS F D D E D E E D D E D C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 101.03 39.53 39.90 70.10 47.43 71.97 79.69 42.72 41.32 74.81 46.25 34.89 X, volume / capacity 0.95 0.51 0.51 0.81 0.63 0.89 0.88 0.44 0.32 0.94 0.96 0.46 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 40.47 2.94 3.29 5.30 3.11 23.59 17.93 0.12 0.16 19.21 2.30 0.22 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.17 0.04 0.04 0.21 0.04 0.04 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 60.56 36.60 36.61 64.79 44.32 48.38 61.76 42.60 41.16 55.60 43.95 34.67 c, Capacity [veh/h] 227 637 571 110 979 432 185 941 418 341 1261 563 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1767 1855 1661 1767 3532 1557 1767 3532 1570 1767 3532 1577 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.12 0.18 0.18 0.05 0.18 0.25 0.09 0.12 0.09 0.18 0.34 0.17 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.13 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.10 0.27 0.27 0.19 0.36 0.36 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 18 48 48 9 39 39 15 37 37 27 50 50 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.40 3.40 2.00 3.10 3.10 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.40 5.40 4.00 5.10 5.10 C, Cycle Length [s] 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 Lane Group L C C L C R L C R L C R
Lane Group Calculations
20 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
624
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 101.03 39.62 39.90 70.10 47.43 71.97 79.69 42.72 41.32 74.81 46.25 34.89 Movement LOS F D D E D E E D D E D C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 55.55 57.92 50.94 49.69
Approach LOS E E D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 53.03
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.804
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 1527.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 59.43 59.43 59.43 59.43
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.817 2.895 3.019 2.944 Crosswalk LOS C C C C
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 493 493 480 727 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 39.75 39.77 40.43 28.35
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.249 2.463 2.142 3.034 Bicycle LOS B B B C
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
21 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
625
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.434
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 12.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 7: Main St/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 95.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 1 1 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Intersection Setup
22 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
626
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 413 79 208 821 84 249
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 103 20 52 205 21 62
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9000 0.9000 0.7800 0.7800 0.8600 0.8600 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 372 71 162 640 72 214
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 2 0 0 0 7 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 8 0 0 24 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 14 5 11 47 14 24
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 348 66 151 569 51 190
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Volumes
23 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
627
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.4 3.4 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10 0 0 10 17 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.4 4.4 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 60 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 0 5 5 5 0
Lead / Lag - - Lead - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 6 0 5 2 4 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
24 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
628
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 56.85 20.36 71.75 54.05 19.75 76.51 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.27 0.81 2.87 2.16 0.79 3.06 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 31.58 11.31 39.86 30.03 10.97 42.50 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.26 0.45 1.59 1.20 0.44 1.70 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes No No Yes
Lane Group LOS B B B A B B
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 14.76 13.12 19.30 7.14 11.90 16.71 X, volume / capacity 0.64 0.28 0.77 0.54 0.23 0.75
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.08 0.51 4.51 0.30 0.30 3.41 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 13.68 12.61 14.78 6.84 11.59 13.30 c, Capacity [veh/h] 642 287 271 1528 372 332
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 3197 1427 1599 3197 1599 1427 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.13 0.06 0.13 0.26 0.05 0.17 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.20 0.20 0.17 0.48 0.23 0.23
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 7 7 6 18 9 9
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.40 3.40 2.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 5.40 5.40 4.00 5.40 5.40 5.40 C, Cycle Length [s] 37 37 37 37 37 37
Lane Group C R L C L R
Lane Group Calculations
25 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
629
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 14.76 13.12 19.30 7.14 11.90 16.71 Movement LOS B B B A B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 14.50 9.60 15.50
Approach LOS B A B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 11.96
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.434
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F F F
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 667 1333 667 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 20.00 5.00 20.00
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.966 2.409 1.560 Bicycle LOS A B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
26 LOSReport
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 7: 7 Background plus Project Conditions AM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
630
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.679
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 37.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Sellers Rd/E Cypress Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 45.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 150.00 100.00 150.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 185.00 100.00 185.00 250.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Intersection Setup
1 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
631
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 1 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 196 138 936 22 63 288 197 1076 105 347 871 13 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 49 35 234 5 16 72 49 269 26 87 218 3 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.6500 0.6500 0.6500 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9100 0.9100 0.9100 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 165 116 786 14 41 187 181 990 97 316 793 12 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 16 16 1 10 16 52 53 148 15 1 94 11 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 54 98 679 1 25 125 127 463 61 97 566 1 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 86 2 106 3 0 10 1 379 7 218 133 0 Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd E Cypress Rd E Cypress Rd
Volumes
2 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
632
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 43 0 0 21 0 12 32 0 24 44 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 30 60 0 30 60 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 8 0 0 4 0 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Split Split Split Split Split Split Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 120
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
3 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
633
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 154.50 345.10 294.18 79.72 147.69 209.30 324.85 334.53 175.80 235.58 246.46 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 6.18 13.80 11.77 3.19 5.91 8.37 12.99 13.38 7.03 9.42 9.86 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 85.83 222.72 183.20 44.29 82.05 119.62 206.90 214.45 97.66 138.93 147.03 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 3.43 8.91 7.33 1.77 3.28 4.78 8.28 8.58 3.91 5.56 5.88 Critical Lane Group No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Lane Group LOS C D D D D D C D D C C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 28.32 41.48 36.31 38.71 44.11 47.80 34.99 37.05 43.36 31.74 32.39 X, volume / capacity 0.40 0.83 0.88 0.36 0.79 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.78 0.63 0.63 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.52 9.22 3.49 0.90 3.88 7.50 2.04 4.07 3.09 0.71 1.35 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.27 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 27.80 32.26 32.82 37.81 40.23 40.30 32.95 32.99 40.27 31.03 31.03 c, Capacity [veh/h] 493 465 779 239 364 236 942 471 443 925 482 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1752 1652 2768 1816 2768 1752 3503 1751 3403 3503 1826 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.11 0.23 0.25 0.05 0.10 0.11 0.22 0.23 0.10 0.17 0.17 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.27 0.27 0.13 0.26 0.26 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 27 27 27 13 13 13 26 26 12 25 25 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Lane Group L C R C R L C C L C C
Lane Group Calculations
4 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
634
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 28.32 41.48 37.64 38.71 38.71 44.11 47.80 35.54 37.05 43.36 31.96 32.39 Movement LOS C D D D D D D D D D C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 36.66 42.88 37.41 35.17
Approach LOS D D D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 37.02
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.679
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 49.50 49.50 49.50 49.50
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.950 2.548 3.179 3.402 Crosswalk LOS C B C C
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 650 283 433 633 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 27.34 44.20 36.84 28.02
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 3.655 2.175 2.318 2.237 Bicycle LOS D B B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 4 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
5 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
635
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.362
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 50.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Sellers Ave/Laurel Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Ave Laurel Rd
Intersection Setup
6 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
636
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 16 390 225 191 680 59
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 4 98 56 48 170 15
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 16 390 225 191 680 59
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 16 9 15 0 0 34
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 1 1 6 10 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 186 134 35 645 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 194 75 150 25 25
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Ave Laurel Rd
Volumes
7 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
637
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 10 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 5 5 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 35 31 65 0 69 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 30 30 0 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 5 5 0 5 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 6 0 4 0
Control Type Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fixed time
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 120
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
8 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
638
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 26.41 336.68 286.71 124.78 427.78 74.09 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.06 13.47 11.47 4.99 17.11 2.96 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 14.67 216.13 177.47 69.32 288.50 41.16 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.59 8.65 7.10 2.77 11.54 1.65 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes No Yes No
Lane Group LOS E E D D D C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 57.26 78.19 41.57 37.84 42.90 33.77 X, volume / capacity 0.05 0.76 0.37 0.21 0.57 0.11
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.35 10.26 1.73 0.52 1.96 0.39 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 56.91 67.92 39.83 37.32 40.94 33.38 c, Capacity [veh/h] 294 512 607 914 1197 550
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1603 3204 1683 2532 3113 1431 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.01 0.12 0.13 0.08 0.22 0.04 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.18 0.16 0.36 0.36 0.38 0.38
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 31 27 61 61 65 65
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 169 169 169 169 169 169
Lane Group L C C R L R
Lane Group Calculations
9 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
639
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 57.26 78.19 41.57 37.84 42.90 33.77 Movement LOS E E D D D C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 77.36 39.86 42.17
Approach LOS E D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 50.71
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.362
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 51.34 51.34 51.34
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.427 2.798 2.530 Crosswalk LOS B C B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 450 1017 1083 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 36.04 14.50 12.60
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.895 2.246 1.560 Bicycle LOS A B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
10 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
640
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.778
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 19.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 3: Sellers Rd/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 92 337 51 13 228 47 75 113 54 43 85 21 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 23 84 13 3 57 12 19 28 14 11 21 5 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 92 337 51 13 228 47 75 113 54 43 85 21 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 4 132 0 0 77 21 41 0 2 0 0 0 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 88 203 51 13 149 22 34 113 52 43 85 21 Name
Volumes
11 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
641
Intersection LOS C
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 19.26
Approach LOS D B B B
Approach Delay [s/veh] 26.29 14.91 14.60 12.58
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 184.10 67.46 55.77 29.07 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 7.36 2.70 2.23 1.16
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.78 0.49 0.44 0.28
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 616 586 549 524
Lanes
Intersection Settings
12 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
642
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.024
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 11.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 4: Sellers Rd/Project Access 1
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 1
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 393 234 25 13 3
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 98 59 6 3 1
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 393 234 25 13 3
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 12 24 25 13 3
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 1 1 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 186 134 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 194 75 0 0 0
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd Project Access 1
Volumes
13 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
643
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.27
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 11.31
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.10 2.10 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.80 9.19 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
14 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
644
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.021
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 11.5
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: Sellers Rd/Project Access 2
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1 381 213 24 12 2
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 95 53 6 3 1
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 1 381 213 24 12 2
Other Volume [veh/h] 1 0 3 24 12 2
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 1 1 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 186 134 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 194 75 0 0 0
Name Sellers Rd Sellers Rd
Volumes
15 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
645
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.26
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.02 0.00 11.19
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.00 1.80 1.80 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.54 9.10 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
16 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
646
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.666
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 52.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Main St/Laurel Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 49.21 0.00 0.00 49.21 0.00 0.00 49.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 305.00 100.00 1150.00 215.00 100.00 215.00 160.00 100.00 160.00 240.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Intersection Setup
17 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
647
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 1
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 1 0 0 1
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 1 0 0 1
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 1 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 1 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 216 463 157 144 458 388 311 916 214 68 356 88 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 54 116 39 36 114 97 78 229 53 17 89 22 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 0.9600 0.9600 0.9600 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 192 412 140 127 403 341 299 879 205 60 313 77 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 16 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 24 22 0 4 18 47 83 6 40 0 2 4 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 32 45 14 28 59 265 76 659 42 2 50 16 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 136 345 119 95 326 29 140 187 123 58 245 57 Name Main St Main St Laurel Rd Laurel Rd
Volumes
18 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
648
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No Yes No Yes No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.5 0.0 2.0 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.1 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 18 0 0 24 0 0 26 0 0 30 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Split [s] 33 33 0 37 37 0 27 59 0 11 43 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.5 0.0 3.0 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.1 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 11 33 0 11 33 0 14 35 0 18 39 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 10 0 6 10 0 6 6 0 6 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 7 4 0 3 8 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lagging Force-Off
Offset [s] 108.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 140
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
19 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
649
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 320.53 298.09 278.69 224.36 227.43 408.43 586.60 553.69 256.62 114.07 245.75 124.43 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 12.82 11.92 11.15 8.97 9.10 16.34 23.46 22.15 10.26 4.56 9.83 4.98 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 203.54 186.20 171.35 130.64 132.90 272.95 400.81 391.45 154.65 63.37 146.50 69.13 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 8.14 7.45 6.85 5.23 5.32 10.92 16.03 15.66 6.19 2.53 5.86 2.77 Critical Lane Group Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Group LOS E C C E C D F D D E D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 70.12 27.32 27.47 67.44 28.88 36.87 133.16 51.90 42.85 71.62 54.92 52.21 X, volume / capacity 0.91 0.39 0.39 0.86 0.32 0.61 1.08 0.94 0.49 0.79 0.62 0.35 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 10.48 1.39 1.52 5.03 0.59 4.21 74.67 2.28 0.33 5.85 0.41 0.30 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.09 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 59.65 25.94 25.95 62.41 28.30 32.66 58.49 49.62 42.53 65.77 54.51 51.91 c, Capacity [veh/h] 238 828 757 167 1436 641 288 971 433 86 575 253 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1767 1855 1695 1767 3532 1577 1767 3532 1575 1767 3532 1556 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.12 0.17 0.17 0.08 0.13 0.25 0.18 0.26 0.14 0.04 0.10 0.06 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.14 0.45 0.45 0.09 0.41 0.41 0.16 0.28 0.28 0.05 0.16 0.16 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 19 62 62 13 57 57 23 39 39 7 23 23 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 3.40 3.40 2.00 3.10 3.10 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.50 5.50 4.00 5.40 5.40 4.00 5.10 5.10 C, Cycle Length [s] 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 Lane Group L C C L C R L C R L C R
Lane Group Calculations
20 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
650
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 70.12 27.37 27.47 67.44 28.88 36.87 133.16 51.90 42.85 71.62 54.92 52.21 Movement LOS E C C E C D F D D E D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 38.43 37.62 68.10 56.67
Approach LOS D D E E
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 52.00
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.666
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 5111.22 0.00 0.00 2620.88 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 59.43 59.43 59.43 59.43
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.731 2.875 2.994 2.802 Crosswalk LOS B C C C
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 393 450 766 541 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 45.20 42.04 26.66 37.25
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.249 2.376 2.748 1.982 Bicycle LOS B B B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
21 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
651
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.325
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 8.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 7: Main St/Delta Rd
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 40.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 95.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 1 1 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Intersection Setup
22 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
652
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 690 121 154 541 15 19
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 173 30 38 135 4 5
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9400 0.9400 0.9100 0.9100 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 649 114 140 492 14 18
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 7 0 0 0 4 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 26 0 0 16 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 54 16 28 31 9 16
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 562 98 112 445 1 2
Name Brentwood Blvd Main S Delta Rd
Volumes
23 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
653
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.4 0.0 2.0 3.4 3.4 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10 0 0 10 17 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.4 4.4 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 60 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 0 5 5 5 0
Lead / Lag - - Lead - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 6 0 5 2 4 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
24 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
654
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 46.69 14.31 43.89 0.98 4.39 6.04 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.87 0.57 1.76 0.04 0.18 0.24 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 25.94 7.95 24.38 0.55 2.44 3.36 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.04 0.32 0.98 0.02 0.10 0.13 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes No No Yes
Lane Group LOS A A B A B B
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 9.20 7.55 18.44 3.07 15.16 16.53 X, volume / capacity 0.66 0.26 0.77 0.29 0.22 0.32
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.73 0.30 6.09 0.08 1.65 2.96 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 8.47 7.26 12.35 2.99 13.51 13.56
c, Capacity [veh/h] 1040 464 200 1878 67 60
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 3197 1427 1599 3197 1599 1427 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.22 0.08 0.10 0.17 0.01 0.01 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.32 0.32 0.12 0.59 0.04 0.04
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 9 9 4 17 1 1
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.40 3.40 2.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 5.40 5.40 4.00 5.40 5.40 5.40 C, Cycle Length [s] 29 29 29 29 29 29
Lane Group C R L C L R
Lane Group Calculations
25 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
655
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 9.20 7.55 18.44 3.07 15.16 16.53 Movement LOS A A B A B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 8.96 6.47 15.92
Approach LOS A A B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 7.99
Intersection LOS A
Intersection V/C 0.325
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F F F
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 667 1333 667 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 20.00 5.00 20.00
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.229 2.133 1.560 Bicycle LOS B B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
26 LOS Report
TJKM
Sellers Rd TIS
Scenario 8: 8 Background plus Project Conditions PM
Version 2020 (SP 0-0)
Generated with
656
Responses to Comments
Sellers Avenue Subdivision
January 2023
1 INTRODUCTION
This Responses to Comments document contains comments received during the public review period of the Sellers Avenue Subdivision Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND).