Oakley City Council
May 14, 2024

AGENDA

REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY

COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/OAKLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
Tuesday, May 14, 2024
6:30 PM
Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California 94561.

Unless stated otherwise on the agenda, every item on the agenda is exempt from CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15378, 15301, 15323 and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065.

MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley will create a resilient future that fosters and attracts a vibrant and evolving community that welcomes and values all people.

VISION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley celebrates our unique Delta lifestyle and small-town feel where we Live in a safe, dynamic community, Work together to build the future, and Play in our own backyard.

Agendas are posted in Oakley at Oakley City Hall-3231 Main Street, outside the gym at Delta Vista Middle School-4901 Frank Hengel Way and outside the Library at Freedom High School-1050 Neroly Road.

Agendas are also posted on the City’s Internet Website www.ci.oakley.ca.us.

A complete packet of information containing staff reports and exhibits related to each item is available for public review prior to an Oakley City Council and/or City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority meeting at Oakley City Hall, 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Oakley City Council, Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency or Oakley Public Financing Authority regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection, during regular business hours, at the front counter in the Main Lobby of the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Agendas may be picked up at the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 for no charge. To request information regarding placement on the City’s agenda e-mail distribution list, please contact us at (925) 625-7000.

The City of Oakley provides social media options to stay connected to City Hall through Facebook, Twitter, Next Door and Instagram. Other opportunities to connect with City Hall include Engage In Oakley, Oakley OnDemand on the City's website, and by emailing [email protected]. 1 If you have a physically challenging condition and require special accommodations, please call the City Clerk’s office at (925) 625-7000.

Please keep cell phones/electronic devices turned off during the meeting. Please be advised that City Council meetings are video recorded and attendees may appear on video.

Information Regarding Public Comment
Members of the public may address the Council on items of interest that are within the City’s jurisdiction. In compliance with State law, the council may not take actionor have discussion on any item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. Public comment on items not listed on the agenda will be heard under the Public Comments section of the agenda. Public comments on items listed on the agenda will be heard as the Mayor calls the items. In compliance with State law, the Council may not take action on an item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. If you would like to speak on any agenda item, please fill out a public speaker card available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk seated in the Council Chamber prior to the agenda item being called. The Mayor will call you by name to the podium to hear your comment.

PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES. Online public comments are accepted until 5 p.m. the day of the meeting and can be submitted at
https://www.ci.oakley.ca.us/online-public-comment-card/.

1.OPENING MATTERS
Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority

1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority

1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag

1.3 Award of Certificates for the Oakley Leadership Academy

1.4 Presentation of Proclamations 1. Building Safety Month (Ken Strelo, Community Development Director) 2. National Police Week (Paul Beard, Police Chief 3. National Public Works Week (Kevin Rohani, Public Works Director/City Engineer)

1. Building Safety Month Proclamation

2. National Police Week Proclamation

3. National Public Works Week Proclamation

2.PUBLIC COMMENTS
2 At this time, the public is permitted to address the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority on non-agendized items.

3.COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS

4.CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are typically non-controversial in nature and are considered for approval by the Oakley City Council/ Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority with one single action. Members of the audience, Staff or the Oakley City Council/ Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority who would like an item removed from the Consent Calendar for purposes of public input may request the Mayor remove the item. The public may request to remove an item(s) to provide input by completing a public speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk prior to the item(s) being called by the Mayor.

4.1 Approve Minutes from the Regular Joint City Council/City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency and Special Public Financing Authority Meeting held April 23, 2024 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) Minutes 04-23-24

4.2 Accept Report Out of Closed Session Memo (Derek Cole, City Attorney) Memo

4.3 Waive the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 7-24 Amending Section

2.1.010 of the Oakley Municipal Code Concerning the Use of Social Media by Members of the City Council (Derek Cole, City Attorney) Ordinance

4.4 Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Contract to Capra Environmental Services Corporation for On-Call Weed and Brush Maintenance Grazing Services for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024/25 and 2025/26 and approving Contract Amendment No. 1 for FY 2023/24 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report

1. Capra Proposal 2024

2. Capra On-Call FY 23-24 Amendment No. 1

3. Resolution

4.5 Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Contract with Strike Doors, LLC for On-Call Electrical Gate and Door Maintenance Services and Repair for City facilities for FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
3 Staff Report

1. Strike Doors Proposal

2. Resolution

4.6 City of Oakley Investment Report (3rd Quarter FY 2023/24) (Jeri Tejeda, Administrative Services Director)
Staff Report

1. City of Oakley Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2024

2. FY 2024 City Investment Worksheet

4.7 City of Oakley as Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency Quarterly Investment Report (3rd Quarter FY 2023/24) (Jeri Tejeda, Administrative Services Director)
Staff Report

1. City of Oakley as Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2024.

4.8 Adopt a Resolution Approving the 2024 Oakley Regional Park Master Plan, Capital Improvement Program Project No. 176 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer
Staff Report

1. Resolution

2. 2024 Oakley Regional Park Master Plan

4.9 Adopting Two Resolutions Initiating the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 proceedings; initiating the process and declaring the intention to levy and collect assessments, and setting June 11, 2024, as the date for the Public Hearing (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
Staff Report

1. Resolution No 1

2. Resolution No 2

3. Preliminary Engineers Report

4.10 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement for Downtown Tree Lighting Maintenance Services with Pacific Display, Inc. for the City of Oakley for Fiscal Years (FY) 2024/25 and 2025/26 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
Staff Report
4 1. Resolution

2. Pacific Display Proposal

4.11 Adopt Two Resolutions Approving a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and a Final Map for Summer Lake North (Phase 1) Village 1 Subdivision 9616 located at the northeast corner of East Cypress Road and Bethel Island Road (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report

1. Vicinity Map

2. Resolution - FM

3. Resolution - SIA

4. Draft SIA

5. Final Map

4.12 Adopt Two Resolutions Approving a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Final Map for Summer Lake North (Phase 1) Village 2 Subdivision 9617 located at the northeast corner of East Cypress Road and Bethel Island Road (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
Staff Report

1. Vicinity Map

2. Resolution - FM

3. Resolution - SIA

4. Draft SIA

5. Final Map

4.13 City of Oakley General Plan Annual Progress Report Calendar Year 2023 (Evan Gorman, Associate Planner)
Staff Report

1. City of Oakley General Plan Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2023

4.14 (Continued from April 23, 2024) Adopt a Resolution Accepting a Grant Deed Conveying to the City of Oakley Certain Real Property Interests (portions of APN 034-090-022, located at Laurel Road and O’Hara Avenue) (Derek Cole, City Attorney)
Staff Report

1. Proposed Resolution Accepting Real Property

4.15 Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Contract to Sweeping Corp of America (SCA) for Street and Parking Lot Sweeping Maintenance Services for the City of Oakley for FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
Staff Report

1. SCA Proposal 2024
5 2. Resolution

5.PUBLIC HEARINGS

5.1 Planning Area 6-H Subdivision 9636 (East Cypress Corridor Specific Plan) Tentative Map (TM 01-23) – Request for approval of a Vesting Tentative Map to subdivide 16.5 acres into 89 single family residential lots. APNs 032-082-010 and 032-082-011 (Ken Strelo, Community Development Director) Suggested Action: 1) Receive the Staff Report, 2) Receive Questions from the City Council, 3) Open the Public Hearing, 4) Receive Comments from the Applicant, 5) Receive Public Testimony, 6) Close the Public Hearing, 7) Deliberate, 8) Summarize the Deliberation 9) Adopt the Resolution
Staff Report

1. Vicinity Map

2. Notice of Public Hearing

3. Applicant's Plans

4. Proposed Resolution

6.REGULAR CALENDAR

6.1 Adopt a Resolution to re-allocate or un-fund certain capital improvement projects for fiscal year 2023-2024 (Jeri Tejeda, Administrative Services Director) Staff Report

1. Resolution

2. Capital Improvement Schedule

7.REPORTS

7.1 CITY MANAGER
(a) City Manager
(b) Business License Update
(b) April 2024 New Business Licenses

7.2 OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a) Reports from Council Liaisons to Regional Committees, Commissions and Boards AND Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency
(b) Requests for Future Agendas
6 8.WORK SESSIONS

8.1 Fiscal Year 2024/25 Budget Work Session (Jeri Tejeda, Administrative Services Director)
Budget Study Session FY 2024-25 PowerPoint

8.2 Pancho’s Market 2 - Preliminary General Plan Amendment (PA 02-23) – Work Session to discuss the merits of a potential project to amend the General Plan Land Use Designation of an approximately 0.42-acre parcel from Residential Low/Medium (RLM) to Commercial (CO) (Evan Gorman, Associate Planner) Staff Report

1. Vicinity Map

2. Notice of Work Session

3. General Plan Land Use Map Excerpt

4. Planning Commission Staff Report from April 2, 2024

8.3 5050 Live Oak Avenue - Preliminary General Plan Amendment (PA 01-24) – Work Session to discuss the merits of a potential project to amend the General Plan Land Use Designation of an approximately 1.42-acre parcel from Light Industrial (LI) to Residential Low/Medium (RLM) (Evan Gorman, Associate Planner)
Staff Report

1. Vicinity Map

2. Notice of Work Session

3. General Plan Land Use Map Excerpt

4. Planning Commission Staff Report from April 2, 2024

9.CLOSED SESSION

9.1 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.5(e)
Title: City Manager

10.ADJOURN
7 Proclamation
Building Safety Month — May, 2024
WHEREAS, the City of Oakley is committed to recognizing that our growth and strength depends on the safety and essential role our homes, buildings and infrastructure play, both in everyday life and when disasters strike; and
WHEREAS, our confidence in the resilience of these buildings that make up our community is achieved through the devotion of vigilant guardians – building safety and fire prevention officials, architects, engineers, builders, tradespeople, design professionals, laborers, plumbers and others in the construction industry – who work year-round to ensure the safe construction of buildings; and WHEREAS, these guardians are dedicated members of the International Code Council, a nonprofit that brings together local, state, territorial, tribal and federal officials who are experts in the built environment to create and implement the highest-quality codes to protect us in the buildings where we live, learn, work and play; and
WHEREAS, these modern building codes include safeguards to protect the public from hazards such as hurricanes, snowstorms, tornadoes, wildland fires, floods, and earthquakes; and WHEREAS, Building Safety Month is sponsored by the International Code Council to remind the public about the critical role of our communities’ largely unknown protectors of public safety – our local code officials - who assure us of safe, sustainable, and affordable buildings that are essential to our prosperity; and
WHEREAS, “Mission Possible”, The theme for Building Safety Month 2024, encourages us all to raise awareness about building safety on a personal, local and global scale; and WHEREAS, each year, in observance of Building Safety Month, people all over the world are asked to consider the commitment to improve building safety, resilience and economic investment at home and in the community, and to acknowledge the essential service provided to all of us by local and state building departments, fire prevention bureaus and federal agencies in protecting lives and property.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Anissa Williams, Mayor of the City of Oakley along with the members of the Oakley City Council, hereby proclaim the month of May 2024 as Building Safety Month.

May 14, 2024
____________________
Anissa Williams, Mayor
8 Proclamation
National Police Week
May 12-18, 2024
WHEREAS, there are approximately 900,000 law enforcement officers serving in communities across the United States, including the dedicated members of the Oakley Police Department; and WHEREAS, nearly 60,000 assaults against law enforcement officers are reported each year, resulting in approximately 16,000 injuries; and
WHEREAS, in 1962, President Kennedy proclaimed May 15 as National Peace Officers Memorial Day and the calendar week in which May 15 falls, as National Police Week; and WHEREAS, the members of the law enforcement agency of the City of Oakley play an important role in safeguarding the rights and freedoms of the citizens of our community; and, WHEREAS, it is important that all citizens know and understand the problems, duties, responsibilities, hazards, and sacrifices of their police department, and that members of our police department recognize their duty to serve the people by safeguarding life and property, by protecting them against violence and disorder, and by protecting the innocent against deception and the weak against oppression or intimidation; and, WHEREAS, our police department has grown to be a modern and scientific law enforcement agency which unceasingly provides professional law enforcement services.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Anissa Williams, Mayor of the City of Oakley, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby recognize the week of May 12-18, 2024 as National Police Week in the City of Oakley, and further extend appreciation to all Law Enforcement for the vital services they perform and their exemplary dedication to the community they serve.

May 14, 2024
_____________________
Anissa Williams, Mayor
9 Proclamation
National Public Works Week
May 19-25, 2024
WHEREAS, public works professionals focus on infrastructure, facilities and services that are of vital importance to sustainable and resilient communities and to the public health, high quality of life and well-being of the people of Oakley; and
WHEREAS, these infrastructure, facilities and services could not be provided without the dedicated efforts of public works professionals, who are engineers, managers, and employees at all levels of government, who are responsible for rebuilding, improving, and protecting our nation’s transportation system, public buildings, parks and other structures and facilities essential for our citizens; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the citizens, civic leaders, and children in Oakley to gain knowledge of and maintain an ongoing interest and understanding of the importance of public works and public works programs in their community; and
WHEREAS, the year 2024 marks the 64th annual National Public Works Week sponsored by the American Public Works Association.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Anissa Williams, Mayor of the City of Oakley along with the members of the Oakley City Council, do hereby proclaim the week of May 19 - 25, 2024 as National Public Works Week in the City of Oakley, and call upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the issues involved in providing our public works and to recognize the substantial contributions which public works officials make every day to protect our health, safety, comfort and quality of life.

May 14, 2024
___________________
Annissa Williams, Mayor
10 Minutes of the Regular Joint Meeting of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency and Special Meeting of the Oakley Public Financing Authority held
April 23, 2024
1) OPENING MATTERS

1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority
Mayor Anissa Williams called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California. Vice Mayor Shannon Shaw and Councilmembers Hugh Henderson, George Fuller and Aaron Meadows were also present.

1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
Mayor Williams led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

1.3 Update from Liberty Union High School District Superintendent (Eric Volta) and Oakley Union Elementary School District Superintendent (Jeff Palmquist)
Superintendent Eric Volta provided an update and handout to the Council including information regarding current enrollment, academics, Measure U and other projects, the proposed District focus for 2023-2024, and District budget.

Dr. Fuller inquired about the partnership or academy Superintendent Volta mentioned.

Superintendent Volta explained it is the California Partnership Academy whereby schools can create a smaller learning community within a school, in this case, contractors, homebuilders, etc. to provide a school to career program, also called linked learning in some cases. He mentioned they have the classes, there is just a little extra funding for them to make clean classes of core classes, i.e., English 11 Construction Academy or U.S. History Construction Academy, for the students to go to school together.
11 Dr. Fuller commented that it is concerning to hear that they are the 4th lowest funded.

He inquired if that is based on per student.

Superintendent Volta confirmed that it is per student. He explained that with the new funding model (in last 10 years), schools with high numbers of students that are either English language learners or receive reduced/free lunch receive a greater amount of money per student, and there are also some high school districts that are rather small in affluent areas that receive more money than the state would actually give them under LCFF. He mentioned they have a low number of students that are signing up for reduced/free lunch (under 30%) and so their general fund revenue is not as great.

Dr. Fuller congratulated him on the figures and mentioned they went up in both English and Math, and their acceptance rates are at least at par, if not more, into UCs and CSUs.

Superintendent Volta mentioned he is very happy with last year’s acceptance rates, and they will see how this year’s acceptance rates are.

Mayor Williams inquired where he is seeing the biggest impact with being the 4th lowest funded, i.e., attracting teachers, teacher shortages, or openings for teachers.

Superintendent Volta mentioned there are 4 openings, 3 in English, with interviews happening for some today. He explained that when they have freshmen sign up for classes early, in January/February, it is to determine students’ needs for courses and so the District may offer teachers. He mentioned one way they are attracting teachers from other districts is to allow them to bring their kids into the District.

Superintendent Jeff Palmquist provided an update and handout to the Council including the LCAP process, professional development, continued work with the County office on literacy, residency grants, district and community-wide events, advisory councils, developing a comprehensive facilities plan that details recommendations from the facilities audit, investigate the cost and feasibility of a Facilities Master Plan, upgrade facility security across all district facilities, work with the City and other partners on joint use, enrollment, schools, finance, and challenges (state budget, post-COVID behavior and support, and structure and alignment).

Mayor Williams inquired if there is still discussion regarding a potential school site on E.

Cypress with enrollment increasing and anticipated growth on E. Cypress.

Superintendent Palmquist mentioned with the Facilities Master Plan, it is comprehensive, i.e., future site, school boundaries, state of affairs on current sites, etc.

He mentioned they are getting ready to issue a Request for Proposals and the firm that is awarded would be tasked with looking at the needs in that area. He commented that Summer Lake is pretty full and will continue to grow. He mentioned they know as more housing comes in that will be of primary concern. He shared that they are still working through it, but they are active, and these things are on top of mind for them. 12 1.4 Proclamation Recognizing May 5-11, 2024 as Municipal Clerks Week (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)
Mayor Williams presented a proclamation to City Clerk Libby Vreonis recognizing May 5-11, 2024 as Municipal Clerks Week.
2) PUBLIC COMMENTS
Michael Dupray commented on a middle school racist assault and bullying incident two years ago in which an agreement was eventually reached with the Oakley Union Elementary School District on 12 issues. He mentioned the District went above and beyond, creating a complete anti-racism program, Creating Places of Belonging, that has successfully been offered to other districts and to the state as a resolution for legislation. On behalf of the parents of African American Students and the NAACP, he thanked Mr. Palmquist, Mrs. Bordanero and Dr. Tiffanie Monique-Jenkins for their strength of character and courage to recognize the problem and work with the student’s mother and NAACP. He provided a handout regarding Creating Places of Belonging.

Odessa Lefrancois thanked Superintendent Palmquist for creating a safe space and working with NAACP to make that happen and commented that it is great to see diversity and inclusion being done in the school system, but it also must happen in the community as a whole. She mentioned on May 4, they will be honoring 5 seniors in East Contra Costa County on a scholarship, at an annual banquet, and she hopes to see other Councilmembers attend; for tickets see Michael Dupray.

Bud Chaddock commented regarding the previous meeting and effort of the Council and staff for their efforts to contact others (CCC Sheriff, EBRPD, U.S. Coast Guard and Fish & Wildlife) regarding enforcement and laws pertaining to poaching and destroying the Marsh Creek ecosystem, in the form of a letter. He mentioned EBRPD has been the first to the rescue in making it known they will have more enforcement now and during the spawn period to write tickets. He thanked Colin Coffey with EBRPD, and EBRPD and its workers, for their clean-up efforts of needles and debris. He also thanked Pete Zirkle with ISD. He requested a copy of the letter the City will send so he may share it with groups concerning the matter. He mentioned this past Earth Day he was on the Upper Sand Creek Basin by the Kaiser facility in Antioch and retrieved many items, over 3 hours covering ½ mile or so, along with 17 volunteers. He thanked Victoria Woolfolk with Contra Costa Resource Conservation District. He mentioned he attended a meeting in Sacramento regarding Bill Jenkins, Chairman of the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, and Jay Sorenson, a defender of the Delta, as well as to talk about his issue.

Vicki Morgan commented that she has lived in her quiet neighborhood for 37 years and requested the Council consider an ordinance for Airbnbs as there is a house near hers in which Police has been called a few times, the house was cleared one time, there are cars parking backward on the lawn and 4 deep in the driveway, and cars backward driving and doing burnouts. She mentioned she also has a new renter on her street that is a nuisance, having many cars and a 20-foot limo. She shared that she called Police, and the cars were all towed except the limo which he states is his car and he finally 13 registered it. She mentioned he doesn’t take care of his yard, he is crashing into neighbors’ cars and doesn’t have insurance, so she is not sure what to do but wants it resolved. She also commented that the volume of meetings online is super low-and suggested it be reviewed. She thanked the City for its service. 3) COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS
Vice Mayor Shaw commented that she appreciates the NAACP scholarship banquet event invitation; however, she is unavailable as it is the same night as City’s 25th Anniversary event but asked them to keep them coming.

Dr. Fuller commented that he wasn’t sitting on the dais then, but the City has an Airbnb policy and good code enforcement, and he has worked with Police on parking issues as well, so he appreciates it is there. He mentioned he just returned from the AERA Annual Conference in Philadelphia, and for people who are hard of hearing, with audio processing deficits, they had a machine the size of an iPad put in the middle will transcribe words as they are being spoken, and he is sure through AI that it could can translate, and if someone is unable to read their native language, they could probably get a Bluetooth to translate the audio. He mentioned it seems fairly inexpensive and easy to have at the Clerk’s desk, so people do not have to call ahead of time or go through a lot to access.

Mayor Williams commented that she is overcommitted on May 4th; she already asked Vice Mayor Shaw to cover two other events for her.
4) CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Williams announced that item 4.4 will be continued to the next meeting.

Dr. Fuller requested items 4.8, 4.9, 4.10 and 4.14 pulled.

It was moved by Dr. Fuller and seconded by Councilmember Meadows to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar excluding item 4.4. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)
Items 4.8, 4.9, 4.10 and 4.14
Dr. Fuller commented on 4.8, 4.9, 4.10, 4.14, that he is very happy to see these items, especially the mention of the systems being out of date. He thanked Ms. Navarro for diligently researching this and bringing it forward so that access to the website can be easier and hopefully protect the City from cyberattacks.

In relation to item 4.14, Mayor Williams requested language be included that the provider must show how it will future proof the website so it will always kept up to date with the latest technology as modernization of technology and the Brown Act occurs, so Council is not having to start over again in 15 years.
14 Ms. Navarro confirmed language can built in. She requested to remove the second paragraph on page 2 of the draft Request for Proposals (RFP) as it includes old language to mail or hand-deliver the RFP.

Mayor Williams inquired about the timeline for the new website.

Ms. Navarro indicated that the RFP will be received in one month, but to implement something as major as this could take up to a year, especially given other priorities staff has and they want to do it right. She mentioned staff has built into the RFP a schedule for the things they are asking for.

It was moved by Dr. Fuller and seconded by Councilmember Meadows to approve items 4.8, 4.9, 4.10 and 4.14. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)

4.1 Approve Minutes from the Regular Joint City Council/City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority Meeting held April 9, 2024 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)

4.2 Accept Report Out of Closed Session Memo (Derek Cole, City Attorney)

4.3 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement for monthly Security Camera Services with KB Security Kams, Inc. for Fiscal Years (FY) 2024/25 and 2025/26 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)

4.4 (Continued from April 9, 2024) Adopt a Resolution Accepting a Grant Deed Conveying to the City of Oakley Certain Real Property Interests (portions of APN 034-090-022, located at Laurel Road and O’Hara Avenue) (Derek Cole, City Attorney)

4.5 Adopt a Resolution Approving the Contract and Grant of Transmission Line Easement for a portion of Laurel Road to Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) to Relocate Electric Utility Poles to accommodate the Laurel Road Widening Project-Capital Improvement Project Number 280 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)

4.6 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with TJKM Transportation Consultants, to provide contract traffic engineering services for the City of Oakley on an on-call basis for Fiscal Years (FY) 2024/25 and 2025/26 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)

4.7 Adopt a Resolution for Award of a contract to Waterworks Industries, Inc. for Lake, Aeration Fountain, Pump Station, Generator Maintenance and Overhead Crane Inspection Services at Cypress Grove Subdivision, Emerson Ranch Subdivision, Delaney Park Subdivision, Prescott Subdivision, Bridgehead Rd, City Hall, Recreation Center and Oakley Plaza 15 for Fiscal Year FY 2024/25 and 2025/26 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)

4.8 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Purchase and Installation of Four New Firewalls (Danielle Navarro, Assistant City Manager and Robert Barker, IT Manager)

4.9 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Contract with Keep IT Simple for Information Technology Services for FY 2024/25 (Danielle Navarro, Assistant City Manager)

4.10 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Purchase and Installation of a New Storage Area Network and Appropriation of $105,538 from the ARPA Fund in FY 2023/2024 (Robert Barker, IT Manager)

4.11 Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement with KB Home North Bay for the sale of the real property containing approximately 27.0-acres, located at the northeast corner of East Cypress Road and Knightsen Avenue (APN 032-081-025) (Joshua McMurray, City Manager)

4.12 Adopt a Resolution Approving the Agreement with McDonald’s USA, LLC (APN 035-510-006) for “Stormwater Management Facility Operations and Maintenance Agreement and Right of Entry” for DR 09-20 McDonald’s Restaurant Project Located at 1060 Laurel Plaza and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)

4.13 Adopt a Resolution Approving the Agreement with McDonald’s USA, LLC for “Agreement of Property Owner for Provision of Landscaping in the Public Right of Way” for DR 09-20 McDonald’s Restaurant Project Located at 1060 Laurel Road and Authorizing the City Manager for Execute the Agreement (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)

4.14 Approve the City of Oakley Website Design, Hosting, Implementation & Maintenance Support Services Request for Proposal (RFP) and Authorize the Release of the RFP (Danielle Navarro, Assistant City Manager) 5) PUBLIC HEARINGS
Mayor Williams announced there are no Public Hearing items. 16 6) REGULAR CALENDAR

6.1 Annual Report of Military Equipment Usage - 2023
(Paul Beard, Chief of Police)
Chief of Police Paul Beard provided a PowerPoint presentation including background information regarding AB 481 (2021), military equipment used by OPD, patrol rifle inventory, less lethal launcher inventory, 2023 military equipment purchases, 2023 military equipment training, 2023 military equipment operational incidents, 2023 military equipment community concerns/complaints, 2023 military equipment internal audit, 2024 military equipment projected purchases, and anticipated “retirement” of military equipment. He announced a community meeting is required within 30 days of this report and it will be held May 16, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. in the Oakley City Council Chambers.

No public comments were submitted.

The City Council had no questions or comments.

6.2 Waive the First Reading and Introduce an Ordinance Amending Section

2.1.010 of the Oakley Municipal Code Concerning the Use of Social Media by Members of the City Council (Derek Cole, City Attorney) City Attorney Derek Cole presented the staff report.

No public comments were submitted.

Dr. Fuller commended Mr. Cole and Councilmember Meadows for the courage they have exemplified in bringing forth this ordinance. He explained that this is not a comfortable position for free speech within this Council Chambers and has not been for a few years. He mentioned Councilmember Meadows talks about six generations. He shared that his great-great-whatever grandfather, Dr. Samuel Fuller, arrived in 1620 in Plymouth, Massachusetts, and was the first doctor in Plymouth and died an early death because he was treating patients. He also shared that his family served their country and worked diligently. He mentioned some may say they were colonizers, but in the process, they built a great nation that came up with the Bill of Rights that exists for many reasons, one of them, freedom of speech. He mentioned he entered the opportunity and distinct honor of military service, the Marine Corp, during wartime, before three of the Councilmembers were born and Councilmember Henderson was probably going around in shorts. He mentioned there were WWII veterans that served, and he understood what it is to stand up for the Constitution of the United States, against all enemies foreign and domestic. He mentioned that many have given their lives to ensure what we have. He shared that Pearl Harbor shows what the Japanese intended, how badly we handled it, and what our response was, and people were giving their lives to ensure that they have freedom of speech because if they would have lost, they would have lost it. He mentioned he sees the ordinance Mr. Cole has brought forth and has heard Councilmember Meadows say that people should be able to say what they want to say on this dais, and he agrees, but has probably angered some people.

He mentioned they need to know that free speech is going to happen and they take 17 responsibility for it, and when he says something at the dais, he understands that, or when he writes something, he understands that, but when someone comes to him and says he better take that back or he is going to suffer consequences, they shouldn’t say something like that with him. He mentioned that this Council, in the time that he has sat on the dais, has spent $25k on consultants to find a way to have a social media policy to quiet certain Councilmembers, especially himself, and if you add in fees to bring meetings together and Mr. Cole’s expertise to write the ordinance, it is at least $10k, so at least $35k has been spent on trying to abridge free speech which he finds shameful.

He mentioned they cannot get a simple device in front of someone to help them hear but they have managed to get $35k for this. He mentioned he hopes this ends the dialogue, and he knows they will have censures and other things, but they will still have free speech up at the dais.

It was moved by Dr. Fuller to waive the first reading and introduce the ordinance as presented.

Mayor Williams clarified that Councilmember Henderson requested the ordinance.

It was seconded by Councilmember Henderson to waive the first reading and introduce the ordinance as presented. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 7) REPORTS

7.1 CITY MANAGER
(a) City Manager
(b) Report from the Oaks Apartments
(c) Legislation Update
(a) City Manager Joshua McMurray mentioned the County is undergoing an update to its Local Hazard Mitigation Plan and the City has slides running on the screens to bring awareness and advertise what the County is doing. He mentioned in an effort to make the County more disaster ready and resilient, the Contra Costa County Office of Emergency Services is seeking feedback on the 2024 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. He explained that the Plan serves as a guide for the County and Oakley to become more resilient to the impacts of natural, human caused, and technological hazards. He shared that Oakley residents are invited to share feedback on the Plan through the City’s website, www.ci.oakley.ca.us, and clicking on the 2024 Hazard Mitigation Plan post under News & Announcements, or by using the links in the City’s Facebook, Instagram and Nextdoor accounts. He mentioned they have also provided a QR code being displayed on the slides during this meeting as well as on the sign in the City Hall lobby.

Mr. McMurray thanked the Council for the approval of the purchase and sale agreement with KB Home North Bay for the Burroughs property. He mentioned construction on E Cypress starts next week; it begins on the frontage of the Burroughs property, starting at the west end of site at E. Cypress and Knightsen Avenue where the signalized intersection will be, then will move east. He shared that they are going through a permitting process and there are birds in the area causing some delay. He mentioned in 18 the next few months construction should happen on the remainder of the roadway; the contract is signed and they are ready to go as soon as they have the green light.

Mr. McMurray announced the City’s 25th Anniversary event will be held May 4 at Civic Center Park, 4pm-10pm. He reintroduced staff member Ken Strelo who was recently promoted to the position of Community Development Director. (b) Mr. McMurray shared that the result of the Affordable Housing Ad-Hoc Committee meetings is to have a monthly report from the management company which is attached to the agenda and representation is here tonight.

An anonymous online public comment was submitted indicating that The Oaks have not lived up to their expectations and what was discussed at the meeting; they are trying about 1% with very little improvement.

Barbara Bautista provided public comments, an update from the residents. She thanked the City for getting involved with the Ad-Hoc Committee and mentioned there were a lot of things that came out of it that were helpful. She mentioned the tenants’ perspective from those she has spoken with, both seniors and families, are pleased right now because things are moving along, landscape and maintenance have started, and it doesn’t mean that things can’t still improve, but that they are seeing a lot of things happening. She mentioned trees are being marked for trimming and the grounds are looking better like 11 years ago when she moved there which is nice to see. She shared that they updated the community room floors and the residents are very happy with that, so they do see some progress happening with it, but tenants are still watching. She mentioned the garbage is still an issue but not as big of an issue as it started out to be and communication blasts are very effective. She added that they know there is room for more improvement, and this is just the beginning, and they have faith that this will continue on.

Dr. Fuller thanked Councilmember Meadows and Vice Mayor Shaw for what they have done to put this together and get action going. He inquired what happens if this doesn’t continue and suggested it be monitored. He mentioned he is a bit chagrin in regard to the report in that it is the type of report that comes across as “we can’t make any money”, they have 74 tenants and 79 are needed to break even, and he is concerned that they have all these great ideas but will eventually indicate they are running out of money. He mentioned the City is part owner of the property and is supposed to receive revenue but never does, although the City facilitated bonds for its construction, so the City needs to take responsibility for that area. He mentioned contacting Mr. McMurray or Mr. Cole for further explanation.

Vice Mayor Shaw thanked Oke Johnson for being present and mentioned in the report, she asked for good and bad, so the short revenue is the bad. She mentioned she wants to know how many residents are participating in the regular meetings so they can have an idea if the number of participants are the same as they had at meetings held at City Hall. She thanked Barbara Bautista for giving the residents’ perspective. She shared that she still receives calls from residents and obviously, nothing changes overnight, but she doesn’t want to borrow worry on what may happen, rather she would like to 19 continue having updates and if things get real bad again, they can discuss bringing the ad-hoc committee back, but hopefully will not have to do that. She mentioned she appreciates the thorough report and suggested they try to lease up to get the full revenue.

Councilmember Meadows thanked Oke Johnson for the report and Barbara Bautista for her comments. He mentioned he wants to continue to hear comments every time Winn Management brings reports. In relation to Dr. Fuller’s comments on revenue, he mentioned he (Councilmember Meadows) has said at previous meetings that he does not care what their revenue is, they have responsibilities, and they need to meet those responsibilities. He shared that he is a landlord and property manager, and it doesn’t matter if he makes money or not, he has to do certain things to provide habitable housing and so do they, and they know that. He thanked Oke Johnson for what has been done so far and mentioned they will be watching.

Mayor Williams requested a couple of follow ups. She mentioned she sees the day-today maintenance states 96 new work orders for March and 295 work orders were completed for March, but she would still like to see how many work orders were called in for March. She mentioned obviously, there was a big backlog. She provided correction; she does not want to see how many were called in, but how old the old work orders were. She mentioned if they only had 96 new work orders and 295 were completed, it seems like a big jump, and she would like data on how many that were completed were old versus new. She mentioned one of the pain points is the gates which has constantly been an issue and it looks like a vendor was supposed to repair the gate on April 17th, so she would like to see follow up to know if the gate got repaired and what the long-term plan is to keep it closed for residents. She requested more detail on these items in future reports. She mentioned she liked the things everyone was talking about, i.e., the number of residents using services and going to meetings. She added that she likes the information that is being provided regarding the programming offered but would like to see the number of people utilizing that. She mentioned food and security is an issue here and she would like to know the number of people utilizing it. She commented that it is a great thing to offer, but whether people utilize it are two different things.

Councilmember Meadows mentioned that in follow up to the service request that Mayor Williams mentioned, he would like to see the average days from open to close on a service ticket.
(c) Mr. McMurray mentioned he does not have further update other than what has been provided in the analysis and he is happy to take any comments or direction.

Dr. Fuller mentioned with AB 1657, about halfway down on the first page, the state legislature can change different allocations and rewrite the laws regarding affordable housing, and the last time it came in, it was, and still is his interpretation, that they can change RHNA numbers and if AB 1657 passes at $10 billion, they can take everything that has been done before and rewrite it in a manner that they want to put it in which bothers him considerably. He mentioned in attending ABAG meetings, all he hears is it is great because they can change RHNA numbers which is mostly coming from more 20 affluent areas in the south, cooler areas, and coastal areas where their RHNA numbers are much higher than ours.

Mayor Williams mentioned the analysis does not mention RHNA much. She requested staff find out if the intent is to decouple RHNA and the Transportation Bond Act. She indicated it is not mentioned here, but that does not mean it is an impossibility.

Mr. McMurray responded that he will confirm that.

Mr. McMurray mentioned AB 1033 is regarding an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) local ordinance separate sale or conveyance which is now law. He explained that it allows cities to introduce an ordinance to allow an ADU to be sold or conveyed separately. He explained that currently, without that ordinance in place, any single-family property that is allowed an ADU by right, the single-family home and ADU cannot be sold separately:
they are sold as one property, but they can be rented out separately. He mentioned this bill would allow for cities to allow a separate sale or conveyance under specific conditions, like the process for residential or commercial condos.

Dr. Fuller mentioned in the first paragraph, it mentions they “may” implement, which he understands they are not required to implement, but they may with specific conditions, but are not obligated to which he is happy to hear about as his preference would be to not get into backyard units being sold with neighbors and condominiums over garages.

Councilmember Meadows mentioned as a real estate agent, he fully agrees with Dr.

Fuller.

Mayor Williams mentioned she requested further analysis on this, mostly because she had local, smaller developers asking her about it and they are targeting cities that are adopting this ordinance to provide these ADUs. She explained as she has mentioned before that she sits on a policy committee that addresses community services and one of its biggest issues right now is homelessness and the easy path that gets people to homelessness so she brought this up, not because she has a position on it, but rather to know implications of adopting an ordinance like this with the caveat that there are a couple of other Senate bills that are going before Tax & Revenue which would potentially exempt ADUs from tax for 15 years which she believes would be a disaster for cities. She mentioned she would like to know the implications of passing an ordinance like this on the housing supply side, implications of any fees the City collects from it, and what it would do for our neighborhoods. She mentioned that she doesn’t want to send staff down a rabbit hole if no one else is interested in that analysis.

7.2 OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a) Reports from Council Liaisons to Regional Committees, Commissions and Boards AND Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency
21 Councilmember Meadows reported he attended the Contra Costa Transportation Authority meeting last Wednesday where they received a presentation on the WETA ferry service and 4 potential locations in 3 different cities (Martinez, Pittsburg, and Antioch).

Dr. Fuller reported that the BAHFA/ABAG/executive committees are very intertwined; it is hard to disassociate one from another. He mentioned that the person heading the housing committee, Carlos Romero, said he is speaking for the landowners, developers, and citizens of the County, which he was amused by. He mentioned the final action of the $20 billion regional bond for affordable housing will go for final approval; however, with ABAG, that doesn’t mean General Assembly; everything is done in committee, so the committee will make the final decision if it goes forward as a regional bond in November or in June, probably after the General Assembly which is June 21. He mentioned they had what he believes a pretty good poll; they found in the 9-county area, citizens (67%) do not believe government is doing a good job, and they also found that citizens believe we need more money and affordable housing needs more money, but citizens (69%) are not in favor of a tax for any matter. He mentioned they went on to say who favors it (50%), but they need 2/3 to pass. He mentioned Berkeley Mayor Jesse Arreguin, who is now trying to be State Senator District 7, suggested elected officials campaign for it which is a great soapbox for him to stand on during his campaign, but he doesn’t know how they are going to overcome 50% and it is going to cost a lot of money to campaign. He added that not surprising, Alameda and San Francisco are in favor, but it is still not by 2/3, and the rest of the 9-county area is not in favor. He mentioned BAHFA discussed labor standards and want project labor agreements (PLA) for all the money that will be coming into ABAG, or at least the 80% that will go out to others; if it goes out to a city, the city will have to go out for a PLA for anything that is spent. He mentioned the state legislature is holding it up and the inside scoop that he got was that the labor trade unions already proposed a PLA agreement with ABAG and BAHFA, but they turned it down and in doing so, said they would send it up to the state and they don’t expect it to pass. He added that PLAs for local areas would be allowable, he is not opposed to that, and the local areas would keep it, supposedly. He mentioned to keep in mind that BAHFA is doing everything it can to get 100% control of regional bonds, they are still active, they are still with the legislature, and still want all the money. He added that they have an expenditure amount and as Mayor Williams mentioned during the last meeting, they expect a big pot in the regional area, and they will allocate all the money in one manner or another. Dr. Fuller also reported he attended the meeting on April 18 that Mayor Williams mentioned and attended the power meeting that was even more depressing. He explained that the power committee out of ABAG has taken it upon itself to start in the process of allocating natural gas because they say it’s going to be a lot cheaper but for all the areas they showed where they would be saving money, they have different double-digit increases in prices in natural gas they would be selling. He mentioned the biggest thing he saw was that they plan to be a regional natural gas distributor. He mentioned he didn’t go to MTC as it is someone else’s bailiwick and he thought this would be enough for him.
22 Councilmember Henderson reported he attended the Ironhouse Sanitary District Board meeting on April 16, the Green Empowerment Zone on April 19, and the East Contra Costa Habitat Conservancy meeting yesterday.

Vice Mayor Shaw reported she attended the Chamber Mixer and the Friends of the Oakley Library had its first presentation for fundraising for the new library and community center. She also reported a library subcommittee meeting on April 17 and a tour with Assemblymember Lori D. Wilson later this week to try and get some more attention around the library project. She reported she attended a fundraising event for Get Vocal for Victims, a non-profit that provide legal and victim services to families at no cost and the speaker was discussing a former police officer that was working security and was killed; his family was denied any victim rights because it was determined he was the victim, not the family, so this non-profit was able to provide services to the family and provide more justice. She also reported that she attended the Opportunity Junction Gala on April 20; the organization provides training for low-income Contra Costa residents to get into the workforce either with administration or nursing and they will have their ribbon cutting for their second nursing program they are starting in Antioch. She mentioned she was on Zoom today, her brother passed away 5 years ago from a fentanyl overdose, and next week she will be speaking at the fentanyl awareness event on April 30 at 6:00 p.m. that will be held at Liberty Union High School District in the Performing Arts Center; registration is available. She shared that there will be presentations regarding fentanyl awareness and Narcan administration, they will be handing out Narcan to all registered attendees that would like it, and she is going to honor her brother and speak about it as a personal experience.

Mayor Williams reported she also attended the Chamber Mixer as she wanted to support the Friends of the Oakley Library in its first presentation. She mentioned she attended the Library stakeholder meeting, Get Vocal for Victims, and yesterday she had an opportunity to take a long tour with Loaves and Fishes that services Oakley and most of Contra Costa County through dining rooms and she had a great experience getting to know their operations and all the things they do for our community, and it’s an important resource which is why she was talking about
food and security. She mentioned that Oakley is the third most utilized for their meals and one of the smallest service areas; it’s a pretty shocking number to beat out Antioch for food and security and she wants to bring attention to it so they can figure out a way to have their community members eat. She explained that is why she wants more detail about what The Oaks are doing for their residents.
(b) Requests for Future Agendas
Mayor Williams requested a letter of support in alignment with CalCities’ letters of support of 5 bills proposing substantial changes to Prop 47, especially punishment for things related to retail theft.

Vice Mayor Shaw supported it and mentioned CalCities has sample letters.

Mayor Williams mentioned she already forwarded the sample letters to Mr. McMurray, hoping that she would get at least a second.
23 8) WORK SESSION
Mayor Williams announced there are no Work Sessions.
9) CLOSED SESSIONS
Mayor Williams announced the Closed Session item. She mentioned the meeting will be adjourned after Closed Session and the next meeting will be held Tuesday, May 14, 2024 at 6:30 p.m. in the Oakley City Council Chambers.

9.1 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.5(e)
Title: City Manager
10) ADJOURN
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted,
Libby Vreonis
City Clerk
24 MEMORANDUM
City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US Date: April 23, 2024
To: Mayor and City Councilmembers
From: Derek P. Cole, City Attorney
CC: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
Subject: Closed Session Report-Out Memo
For Consideration at the City Council Meeting of May 14, 2024 Background and Analysis
The City Council considered the following closed session item during its regular meeting held April 23, 2024:

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.5(e)
Title: City Manager
Direction was provided to staff. There was no reportable action.

Fiscal Impact
None.

Recommendation
Receive and file this report.

Attachments
None.
25 Ordinance No. 7-24 Page 1 of 2
ORDINANCE NO. 7-24

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY AMENDING SECTION 2.1.010 OF THE OAKLEY MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING THE USE

OF SOCIAL MEDIA BY MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Oakley Municipal Code section 2.1.010 is added as follows:

Section 2.1.010 Use of Social Media
a. It is the practice of members of the City Council to use personal social media, which is any digital platform that allows members to create and share information with other users or audiences.
b. When members of the City Council use their personal social media to discuss City matters, their social media communications may be considered public records subject to public disclosure under the California Public Records Act (California Government Code section 7920 et seq.) or other applicable law. c. When members of the City Council use their personal social media and interact in any manner with other members, their social media communications may be subject to open meeting laws, including the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code section 54950 et seq.).
d. When members of the City Council use their personal social media to discuss any quasi-judicial matters that may or do come before the City Council, their social media communications could reasonably be construed as evidence of bias, prejudgment, or personal interest.
e. If Members of the City Council use publicly accessible personal social media to communicate regarding City business, they may be creating a limited public forum subject to First Amendment speech protections. If such a forum is created, a member taking action, such as removing individual comments or blocking individuals from commenting, may violate those individuals’ First Amendment rights. (Lindke v. Freed, United States Supreme Court Case No. 22-611, decided March 15, 2024.)
f. Members of the City Council shall refrain from using any City-owned or issued devices to use or maintain their private social media accounts. g. Members of the City Council shall be provided a written copy of this section at the beginning of any term they serve or fill, following their election, reelection, or appointment, which copy shall be provided no later than the date of the first regular meeting of their term.
26 Ordinance No. 7-24 Page 2 of 2
SECTION 2. CEQA FINDING.

The City Council determines that the provisions of this ordinance are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) because the instant ordinance involves continuing administrative activities and thus is not a project, as CEQA defines, pursuant to Section 15378(b)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines. To the extent the adoption of this Ordinance constitutes a project, the City Council finds pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15061(b)(3) that the project is exempt from environmental review because it can be seen with certainty that the adoption of the ordinance would not have any significant impact on the environment.

SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY.

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining provisions, and the City Council declares that it would have adopted each provision of this ordinance irrespective of the validity of any other provision.

SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after adoption.

SECTION 5. PUBLICATION.

The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause this Ordinance or a summary thereof to be printed once within fifteen (15) days after its adoption in a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Oakley.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oakley this 14th day of May, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
__
Anissa Williams, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________ _________________
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
27 STAFF REPORT

City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: May 14, 2024
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Contract to Capra Environmental Services Corporation for On-Call Weed and Brush Maintenance Grazing Services for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024/25 and 2025/26 and approving Contract Amendment No. 1 for FY 2023/24
Background and Analysis
The City of Oakley has limited in-house resources to be able to address all of the on-going maintenance needs of the public infrastructure and facilities in the community. Outside contractors have been used to supplement City staff in performing maintenance activities.

The various types of public works maintenance activities that the City needs for outside contractor resources generally are major street repair, storm drainpipe repair and rehabilitation, ditch cleaning, large scale brush removal from open ditches and drainage basins, striping of streets and parking lots, guard rail repair and replacement, large scale vegetation management and concrete repair.

Goat and sheep grazing provides weed and brush maintenance in a very cost-effective way, compared to using contractors with mechanized equipment. It is also an environmentally friendly maintenance practice.

The use of these animals for weed clearing has been very successful in Oakley for the past few years and has been popular with many of the Oakley residents who enjoy the sight of the herd grazing in the community. The utilization of goats and sheep for weed and vegetation clearing is also used by Contra Costa County and many other Cities in the Bay Area.

Capra Environmental Services Corporation has been providing weed and brush grazing services for the past few years in Oakley. They have performed well and accommodated the City’s service requests professionally.

On April 14, 2020, an agreement was executed between the City of Oakley and Capra Environmental Services Corporation for on-call maintenance grazing services for Fiscal Year (FY) 2020/21 and 2021/22 and extended an additional two years to June 30, 2024. The contract was limited to a not-to-exceed amount of $50,00 per fiscal year and now is in need of additional funding for services that need to occur prior to the end of FY 2023/24. As a result, Staff are requesting an increase of $40,000 in the contract amount for FY 2023/24, for a total not-to-exceed contract amount of $90,000.

Approved and
Forwarded to the
City Council
28 STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 2
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US In addition, Staff are recommending that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement with Capra Environmental Services Corporation for weed and brush grazing services for FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 for a not to exceed amount of $90,000 for each fiscal year, with the option to extend the contract for an additional two years to 2028 if work is performed satisfactorily.

Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan for community health and safety by ensuring City properties are maintained to preserve safety for the Oakley Community.

Fiscal Impact
The proposed work will be paid for from the Stormwater maintenance fund. Contract signing will not occur until the FY 2024/2025 Budget has been adopted City by Council.

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution approving the additional funding for the FY 2023/24 agreement with Capra Environmental Services Corporation, as well as the new agreement for services for FY 2024/25 and 2025/26 and authorizes the City Manager to execute these agreements.

Attachments
Attachment 1 – Proposal
Attachment 2 – Amendment No. 1 Agreement – FY 2023/24
Attachment 3 - Resolution
29 May 1, 2024
City of Oakley
Public Works Maintenance Foreman
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
Attn: Gary Alsobrook
Thank you for allowing us to propose grazing services again this year. We value your business and want to continue grazing for The City of Oakley not only this year, but each year thereafter.

We have the knowledge and experience to do the job right servicing your community. We have the resources to get the job done and we appreciate the trust you place in us.

Our commitment to complete the job professionally and efficiently is our highest priority. We look forward to continuing our relationship and grazing for The City of Oakley again this year.

Please contact me with any questions. Thanks again!
Sincerely,
Paul Abess
30 Did you know CAPRA is another word for goats? Goats are in our name! CAPRA provides a service using goats and sheep as an eco-friendly way to manage vegetation, brush, weeds, and to help prevent wildfires.

Our large fleet of environmentally friendly, self-propelled weed eating goats and sheep have a very high metabolism to say the least, they are always hungry and ready to go to work! Our fleet consists of 7,500 head Boer Spanish Cross Goats and 2,500 head of Dorper Sheep.

We have worked in the past with homeowners' associations, city & county officials, fire departments, park & recreations and conservancy organizations to clear invasive weeds while protecting native plant life.

BENEFITS OF CHOOSING GOATS:

Eco-friendly - Goats do not pollute and they naturally fertilize as they work.

Reduce Wildfires - Goats work across the country consuming brush to reduce fires and saving lives in the process.

Natural Immunity - Goats are immune to thorns & poison oak and they love eating them!

Cost - Using our goat service can save you up to 50% compared to hiring men and machinery to clear your property.

All our Goats are up to date with their vaccinations, de-wormer and get the right medical care when needed. A “goat herder” is present to ensure that all the goats stay where they are supposed to be when on your property. The goats work when they want and take regular breaks, enjoying fresh water, beautiful views, and fresh air.

Our goats are not specifically trained to eat certain plants and keep away from others, but it is fortunate that many goats favorites are invasive or common nuisance species. These include:
31 • blackberry
• ragweed
• mulberry
• vetch
• autumn olive
• multifora rose
• thistles
• poison oak
• horse weed
• garlic mustard
• leafy spurge
• plantain
• raspberry
• wild parsnip
We use Anatolian Shepherds as predator control dogs. They stay with the goats 24/7 and although generally friendly they take their jobs seriously. We also use a variety of Border Collies as herding dogs. These dogs facilitate the movement of goats from one area to another. Our Collies are bred for their herding abilities.

OUR STAFF:

Debbie Olympius – Veterinary Technician, Field Supervisor That’s right, we have a Vet Tech on staff! Debbie is not only an experienced Veterinary Technician, she has over 20 years of experience in the goat grazing business. As the founder and owner of KD Goat Ranch, she has the knowledge and experience to take our company to the next level.

Paul Abess – Operations Manager
As a former distribution company owner, Paul has extensive knowledge in directing the logistics operation. He has 30 years of experience in logistics and compliments our business by directing the movement of animals and scheduling the necessary tasks to complete the jobs effectively and efficiently.

Shepherds
Our shepherds are experienced goat and sheep managers from Peru. They live on site with the herds to ensure the safety of the animals and the public and care for the animals on the job site. We communicate with each shepherd daily to manage their and the animal’s needs.

WHY GOATS?
Dodging the use of Herbicides and Preventing Wildfires
Avoiding Water Contamination
Natural Insurance
32 Behind the Scenes
Our company has an office staff that supports our field operations and manages all our administrative needs. With shepherds from Peru, a large fleet of 7,000 animals, our equipment, licenses, and records, our administrative staff is busy and instrumental in the success of our operation.

REFERENCES:

State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) – Alameda, Contra Costa, Solano, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Marin Counties
Clearing steep terrain along highways, on ramps, and off ramps for fire prevention.

Contact: Mr. Mike Benca, Field Services
(510) 715-8727
Sacramento County Department of Water Resources – Sacramento County Clearing detention basins of unwanted weeds for fire prevention.

Contact: Mr. Paul Brokken
(916) 875-7136
Cosumnes Community Service District, Parks and Recreation Department – Elk Grove Clearing unwanted weeds surrounding the vernal pool habitats, also aiding in fuel reduction for the surrounding residence.

Contact: Mr. Jeff Repetti, Park Maintenance Manager
(916) 869-2382
El Dorado Hills Community Service District – El Dorado Hills, CA Fuel reduction and weed abatement in steep terrain in public open spaces amongst residence properties in multiple sights.

Contact: Mr. Ryan Kukkola, Park Superintendent
(916) 643-4361
33 SCOPE OF SERVICES:

Graze multiple sites for approximately 45 acres total. Temporary fencing, livestock hauling, on-site shepherd and daily maintenance fees are all included in the grazing fee. Temporary fencing will be removed at the completion of the job. Occasionally at the request of the City, some sites may require grazing twice within a fiscal year.

PRICING:

Price per acre $1,095.00, spring/summer.

Price per acre $ 650.00, fall/winter.
10 acres minimum necessary to avoid transportation and set-up fees.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide grazing services. 34 AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF OAKLEY AND CAPRA

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CORPORATION FOR ON-CALL GOAT GRAZING SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/24
This Amendment is entered into by and between the CITY OF OAKLEY, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “City”), and Capra Environmental Services Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Contractor”), effective as of the 14TH day of May 2024.

RECITALS
A. On April 14, 2020, City and Contractor executed an Agreement for on-call maintenance services for Goat Grazing Services (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”) in the amount of $50,000 per fiscal year for 2020/21 and 2021/22; and then extended through June 30, 2024,
B. City and Consultant now desire that the following amendment be made to the Consultant services for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023/2024: increase of $40,000 to the not-to-exceed contract amount from $50,000 per fiscal year to $90,000 for FY 2023/24 to hereby be approved by the City Manager and their proposal attached here as Exhibit A; and, C. Except as provided herein, all other terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

AGREEMENT
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Oakley, a municipal corporation in the State of California, has authorized the execution of this Amendment in duplicate by its City Manager, Approved to as Form by the City Attorney and attested by its City Clerk as of the 14th day of May 2024, and the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed in duplicate.

City
City of Oakley, a Municipal Corporation
By:

Joshua McMurray, City Manager
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________________
Derek P. Cole, City Attorney
Consultant
Capra Environmental Services Corporation
By:

John Quinn, Owner
35 Resolution No. -24 Page 1 of 1
RESOLUTION NO. __-24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT WITH CAPRA

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CORPORATION FOR ON-CALL WEED AND

BRUSH MAINTENANCE GRAZING SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2023/24 AND APPROVING THE NEW CONTRACT FOR AND FY 2024/25 AND 2025/26
WHEREAS, City of Oakley is responsible for vegetation maintenance services for all the stormwater detention basins and other City parcels of lands at locations throughout the City of Oakley; and
WHEREAS, Capra Environmental Services Corporation has been performing vegetation services using a herd of goats for the past few years for the City of Oakley; and
WHEREAS, Staff recommends executing the contract Amendment No. 1 with Capra Environmental Services Corp. for the increase contract amount of $40,000 for the remainder of FY 2023/24, as well as executing a new contract in the not-toexceed amount of $90,000 each for FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 for grazing services throughout the City; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, by the City Council of the City of Oakley that the agreements with Capra Environmental Services Corp. are hereby approved and the City Council Authorizes the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 for an additional $40,000 for FY 2023/24 as well in a not-toexceed amount of $90,000 annually for FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26. The proposal is hereto attached as Exhibit A.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED, if at the end of the term the services have been performed satisfactorily the City Manager has the discretion to approve an extension of the agreement to June 30, 2028, under the same terms as the original agreement.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oakley at a meeting held on the 14th of May 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTIONS:
36 Resolution No. -24 Page 2 of 1
APPROVED:

___________________
ATTEST: Anissa Williams, Mayor
______ ________
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
37 STAFF REPORT

City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: May 14, 2024
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Contract with Strike Doors, LLC for OnCall Electrical Gate and Door Maintenance Services and Repairs for City of Oakley Facilities for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024/25 and 2025/26 Background and Analysis
The City of Oakley has limited in-house resources to be able to address all of the ongoing maintenance needs of the public infrastructure and facilities. Outside contractors have been used to supplement City staff in performing specialized maintenance and repair activities. These contract services are used to provide maintenance services across all departments including the electric gate and door maintenance, troubleshooting and repairs.

With the geographic location of Oakley in the far eastern region of Contra Costa County, there are limited contractors available to perform various maintenance services for the agencies.

Staff has investigated the concept of having On-Call Maintenance Service Agreements that would provide the City with a wide range of maintenance services for various trades. With this approach, staff can supplement in-house resources with outside contractors to expeditiously and professionally provide these services. The award of the agreement is exempt from competitive bidding under Section 3.6.010 of the Oakley Municipal Code paragraph 8) which provides an exception for competitive bidding “For maintenance and repair of buildings and facilities.” Currently, for all such contract services above the $50,000 amount, the City Council must authorize the work by simple majority per City’s purchasing policy.

Strike Doors, LLC is a contractor that specializes in automatic electric door and gate service, installation, and maintenance. They have been successfully providing emergency door and gate service for the City of Oakley for the last few years. They have performed very well and have been extremely responsive to various service requests. The immediate accessibility of Strike Doors, LLC to provide electric door and gate maintenance service is very valuable to the organization and a factor in their selection as the vendor of choice to provide this maintenance service. The electric doors and gates at the Police Department, Recreation Center, City Hall, and Public Works Operations Building are critical to access to the facilities.

Approved and
Forwarded to the
City Council
38 STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 2
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
This item is consistent with the Strategic Plan 27+ Finance and Fiscal responsibility goals.

Fiscal Impact
Approval of this resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute the On-Call Services Agreement with Strike Doors, LLC for FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26. Funding will be included in the Public Works Operation Budget for the respective fiscal years. The Contract signing will not occur until the FY 2024/2025 Budget has been adopted by the City Council.

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving an On-Call Services Agreement with Strike Doors, LLC for FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 and authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement. If at the end of the term, the services have been performed satisfactorily the City Manager has the discretion to approve an extension of the agreement to June 30, 2028.

Attachments
Attachment 1 – Strike Doors, LLC Proposal
Attachment 2 - Resolution
39 May 1, 2024
[email protected] License No. 1032968 1-800-658-2839 1-800-658-2839
Complete Door Service
www.StrikeDoors.com
[email protected]
License No. 1032968
Dir No. 1000058454
Re: Public Notice – Oakley California
Attn: City of Oakley
Strike Doors LLC, Contractors State License Board (CSLB) #1032968, is a commercial only door servicing company who services a 100-mile radius of Sacramento, CA.

We have a walk-in office and warehouse located at 4237 S Market Ct., Ste. E, Sacramento, CA 95966. Our office and warehouse location are for storage and daily operations with our official mailing address for notices, correspondences, and invoice remittances being sent to 18 Rosita Way, Oroville, CA 95966.

Strike Doors LLC holds the following classifications with CSLB:
➢ C61/D28: Doors, Gates, and Activating Devices
➢ C61/D21: Machinery and Pumps
➢ C17: Glazing
With the beforementioned classifications, we can perform routine services, repairs, and installs of all manners of man-doors, overhead doors, gates, dock levelers, and storefront door systems. For more info on our available services, please visit: www.strikedoors.com.

Serving All of Northern CA
40 May 1, 2024
[email protected] License No. 1032968 1-800-658-2839 Rate Schedule: Our current rate schedule is as followed:
- Normal Business Hour Rates (8am – 5pm Monday – Friday):
o Single Labor = $155/Hour
o Crew Labor (two or more technicians) = $230/Hour
o Mandatory Service Charge = $355
- After Hour Rates:
o Single Labor = $232.50/Hour
o Crew Labor (two or more technicians) = $345/Hour
o Mandatory Service Charge = $355
As of the date of this letter, we do not anticipate any rate hikes for the next 12 months.

Feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns and we look forward to a continued partnership with the City of Oakley.

With Kind Regards,
Lo Saephan
Operations Manager
916-533-6982
[email protected]
41 Resolution No. - 24
RESOLUTION NO. - 24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY

APPROVING THE ON-CALL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH STRIKE DOORS,

LLC FOR ON-CALL ELECTRICAL GATE AND DOOR MAINTENANCE AND

REPAIR SERVICES TO CITY OWNED FACILITIES AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT FOR FISCAL YEARS
2024/25 AND 2025/26
WHEREAS, the City of Oakley Public Works and Engineering Department frequently seeks repair and maintenance services for City owned facilities; and WHEREAS, the City of Oakley does not have in-house resources for providing specialty electrical gate and door repair and maintenance of the city facilities; and WHEREAS, Strike Doors, LLC has provided satisfactory, economical and prompt electrical gate and door maintenance and repair services to the City of Oakley for past few years, and now they have proposed to continue to provide these services; and
WHEREAS, the award of the agreement is exempt from competitive bidding under Section 3.6.010 of the Oakley Municipal Code paragraph 8) which provides an exception for competitive bidding “For maintenance and repair of buildings and facilities”; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, by the City Council of the City of Oakley that the On-Call Electrical Gate Maintenance and Repair Services Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A with Strike Doors, LLC for FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute an agreement.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED, if at the end of the term, the services have been performed satisfactorily the City Manager has the discretion to approve an extension of the agreement to June 30, 2028.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oakley at a meeting held on this 14th day of May 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTIONS:
42 Resolution No. - 24
APPROVED:

___________________
ATTEST: Anissa Williams, Mayor
___
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
43 STAFF REPORT

City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: May 14, 2024
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Jeri Tejeda, Administrative Service Director
SUBJECT: City of Oakley Quarterly Investment Report (3rd Quarter FY 23/24) Background and Analysis
California law and the City’s Investment Policy require the City’s fiscal officer to submit a quarterly investment report to the City Council at the end of each quarter. The report should contain information on all securities held and include a statement denoting the ability of the local agency to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
This agenda item is consistent with the Strategic Plan 27+ goal for the City of Oakley to leverage its financial resources for the long-term benefit of our residents and businesses while maintaining sufficient reserves to provide stability and ensure a successful future.

Fiscal Impact
City resources are organized and accounted for on a fund basis with some of those funds being restricted for specified uses and others that are unrestricted. For investment purposes, however, the funds are invested as a pool. The Investment Report for the Period Ending March 31, 2024, attached shows a combined pool balance of $92,042,229.72 In addition, the pool had combined 3rd Quarter accrued interest earnings of $392,530.49 compared to $359,514.23 at the end of the 2nd Quarter. Interest for the period reflects the high rates currently being offered on safe investments, including LAIF’s short-term investments and the various types of investments that are being made through PFM, with terms of up to five years.

We continue to earn the stated rate of interest at cost on the investments that we have purchased, which can be seen in the PFM investment report and averaged 2.27% for the quarter ended March 31, 2024.

The City is in compliance with the adopted investment policy and able to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

Approved and
Forwarded to the
City Council
44 STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 2
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council accept the investment report for the 3rd Quarter of Fiscal Year 2023-2024.

Attachments

1. City of Oakley Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2024

2. FY 2024 City Investment Worksheet
45 Investment Performance Review
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Client Management Team PFM Asset Management LLC
Allison Kaune, Senior Analyst
Rachael Miller, Client Consultant
213 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101-2141
717-232-2723
1 California Street Ste. 1000
San Francisco, CA 94111-5411
415-393-7270
NOT FDIC INSURED : NO BANK GUARANTEE : MAY LOSE VALUE
For Institutional Investor or Investment Professional Use Only - This material is not for inspection by, distribution to, or quotation to the general public City of Oakley
46 © PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
Market Summary
47 For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
QUARTERLY MARKET SUMMARY Fixed Income Management
Summary
► The first quarter of 2024 was characterized by continued economic resilience led by strong consumer spending, inflation that continues to slowly grind lower, and a robust labor market.
► The Federal Reserve (Fed) kept the overnight rate at its current target range of 5.25% to 5.50% at its March 20 meeting, as expected, marking the fifth consecutive pause following the last rate hike in July 2023. The Fed’s updated “dot plot” implies three 0.25% rate cuts through 2024 while the number of cuts implied for 2025 was reduced from three to two. Markets entered the year pricing in over six cuts in 2024 but since have now converged to Fed projections. The Fed chair has said they need more confidence that inflation is moving toward its 2% target before the first rate cut. Yields moved higher in the first quarter with the return of the Fed’s “higher-for-longer” stance.
► A strong economic backdrop and increasing likelihood for a soft-landing led equity markets to reach new record highs. The S&P 500 Index jumped 10.6% in the first quarter, while yields on U.S. Treasury maturities from one to 30 years were higher by 25 to 40 basis points (bps).

Economic Snapshot
► Although January and February inflation readings came in above expectations, CPI actually trended lower in the first quarter and continued to decline from its mid2022 peak. Headline and core CPI (which excludes food and energy) registered year-over-year increases of 3.2% and 3.8%, respectively, through February. ► U.S. real gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the fourth quarter came in at an impressive 3.4%, capping a strong year in which GDP grew 3.1%. The economy continues to be bolstered by strong consumer spending, supported by the strength of the labor market. This trend is expected to continue before moderating through the balance of the year.
► The U.S. labor market showed little signs of softening, adding over 800,000 jobs in the first quarter after 637,000 were added in the fourth quarter. In the latest reading, 303,000 jobs were created in March, which is the highest level since May of 2023. The unemployment rate also ticked down to 3.8% and has been below 4% for over two years. Strong wage increases reflect a competitive labor market and further support consumer spending.

Interest Rates
► The market spent the majority of the first quarter adjusting its expectations as strong economic data and Fed commentary pushed back on the notion that a rate cut was imminent. As a result, fed funds futures recalibrated expectations throughout the quarter and are now priced for the first rate cut to occur in July, a four-month delay from expectations at the beginning of the year. ► Reflecting the market adjustment to delayed rate cuts expectations, U.S.

Treasury yields increased notably over the quarter. The yield on the 2-, 5-, and 10-year U.S. Treasuries rose 37 bps, 37 bps, and 32 bps, respectively. ► As a result of higher absolute yields, U.S. Treasury indices with longer durations generated negative returns, with the breakeven point around the twoyear maturity. For example, the ICE BofA 3-, 5-, and 10-year U.S. Treasury indices returned -0.21%, -0.76%, and -1.61%, respectively. On the flipside, shorter-duration indices posted positive total returns, as higher income was able to more than offset negative price impacts. The ICE BofA 3-month, 1-, and 2- year U.S. Treasury indices returned +1.29%, +0.83%, and +0.21% respectively.

Sector Performance
► Yield spreads across most investment-grade (IG) sectors continued to tighten throughout the first quarter, resulting in positive excess returns on corporates and most other non-government fixed income sectors. Diversification across these “spread sectors” helped bolster relative performance given the absolute back-up in yields to start the year.
► Federal agency, municipal, and supranational spreads remained low and range bound throughout the first quarter. These sectors eked out positive excess returns, mostly from their modest incremental income. Callable agencies outperformed bullet agencies as bond market volatility waned from recent multi-year highs.
► IG corporates produced strong excess returns on robust market demand and continued yield spread tightening. IG corporates finished the quarter at their lowest spread in over two years. As a result of historically tight spreads, value in the sector is now more opportunistic.
► The asset-backed security (ABS) sector was the strongest-performing fixed income sector in the first quarter. The rally in the sector was supported by strong structural elements of the asset class as well as ongoing optimism regarding the strength of the American consumer and, like IG corporates, robust appetite for new issues. Incremental income from ABS remains attractive and our fundamental outlook for the economy remains supportive for the sector. ► Mortgage-backed security (MBS) performance was mixed for the first quarter, with yield spreads widening in longer maturity structures. Volatility was relativity muted compared to the fourth quarter and helped returns in the first quarter, but the overall sector underperformed. On the other hand, agency commercial mortgage-backed security spreads tightened relative to passthroughs, resulting in strong relative performance.

PFM Asset Management LLC | For Institutional Investor or Investment Professional Use Only – This material is not for inspection by, distribution to, or quotation to the general public. 1 48
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
QUARTERLY MARKET SUMMARY Fixed Income Management
Economic Snapshot
Labor Market Dec '23 Mar '23
Unemployment Rate Mar '24 3.8% 3.7% 3.5%
Change In Non-Farm Payrolls Mar '24 303,000 290,000 146,000 Average Hourly Earnings (YoY) Mar '24 4.1% 4.3% 4.6%
Personal Income (YoY) Feb '24 4.6% 4.9% 5.8%
Initial Jobless Claims (Week) 3/30/24 221,000 198,000 216,000 Growth
Real GDP (QoQ SAAR) 2024Q4 3.4% 4.9% 2.6%
GDP Personal Consumption (QoQ SAAR) 2024Q4 3.3% 3.1% 1.2% Retail Sales (YoY) Feb '24 1.5% 5.0% 2.2%
ISM Manufacturing Survey (Month) Mar '24 50.3 47.1 46.5 Existing Home Sales SAAR (Month) Feb '24 4.38 mil. 3.88 mil. 4.35 mil.

Inflation/Prices
Personal Consumption Expenditures (YoY) Feb '24 2.5% 2.6% 4.4% Consumer Price Index (YoY) Feb '24 3.2% 3.4% 5.0%
Consumer Price Index Core (YoY) Feb '24 3.8% 3.9% 5.6%
Crude Oil Futures (WTI, per barrel) Mar 31 $83.17 $71.65 $75.67 Gold Futures (oz) Mar 31 $2,217 $2,072 $1,969
Latest
0 200K
400K
600K
800K
1,000K

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%
Mar '21 Sep '21 Mar '22 Sep '22 Mar '23 Sep '23 Mar '24 Unemployment Rate (left) vs. Change in Non-Farm Payrolls (right) Change In Non-Farm Payrolls Unemployment Rate
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
Dec '20 Jun '21 Dec '21 Jun '22 Dec '22 Jun '23 Dec '23 Real GDP (QoQ)
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
Mar '21 Sep '21 Mar '22 Sep '22 Mar '23 Sep '23
Consumer Price Index
CPI (YoY) Core CPI (YoY)
2 2
1 1

1. Data as of Third Quarter 2023.

2. Data as of Fourth Quarter 2022.

Note: YoY = year-over-year, QoQ = quarter-over-quarter, SAAR = seasonally adjusted annual rate, WTI = West Texas Intermediate crude oil.

Source: Bloomberg.

PFM Asset Management LLC | For Institutional Investor or Investment Professional Use Only – This material is not for inspection by, distribution to, or quotation to the general public. 2 49
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
QUARTERLY MARKET SUMMARY Fixed Income Management
Source: Bloomberg.

Interest Rate Overview
U.S. Treasury Note Yields U.S. Treasury Yield Curve
U.S. Treasury Yields Yield Curves as of March 31, 2024
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
3-mo1-yr2-yr3-yr5-yr7-yr10-yr20-yr30-yr
Yield
Maturity
March 31, 2024 December 31, 2023 March 31, 2023
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
3-mo1-yr2-yr3-yr5-yr07-yr10-yr25-yr30-yr
Yield
Maturity
U.S. Treasury Federal Agency Corporates, A Rated

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%
3/31/23 6/30/23 9/30/23 12/31/23 3/31/24
Yield
2-Year 5-Year 10-Year
Maturity Mar '24 Dec '23 Change over
Quarter
Mar '23 Change over
Year
3-Month 5.37% 5.34% 0.03% 4.75% 0.62%
1-Year 5.03% 4.77% 0.26% 4.62% 0.41%
2-Year 4.62% 4.25% 0.37% 4.03% 0.59%
5-Year 4.21% 3.85% 0.36% 3.58% 0.63%
10-Year 4.20% 3.88% 0.32% 3.47% 0.73%
30-Year 4.34% 4.03% 0.31% 3.65% 0.69%
PFM Asset Management LLC | For Institutional Investor or Investment Professional Use Only – This material is not for inspection by, distribution to, or quotation to the general public. 3 50
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
QUARTERLY MARKET SUMMARY Fixed Income Management
March 31, 2024 Duration Yield 3 Month 1 Year 3 Years
1-3 Year Indices
U.S. Treasury 1.83 4.70% 0.30% 2.97% 0.08%
Federal Agency 1.62 4.80% 0.46% 3.54% 0.27%
U.S. Corporates, A-AAA rated 1.84 5.23% 0.73% 4.71% 0.72% Agency MBS (0 to 3 years) 1.97 5.27% 0.49% 3.84% (0.49%) Taxable Municipals 1.35 4.95% 0.89% 3.98% 1.09%
1-5 Year Indices
U.S. Treasury 2.59 4.55% (0.02%) 2.42% (0.59%)
Federal Agency 1.96 4.70% 0.33% 3.29% (0.29%)
U.S. Corporates, A-AAA rated 2.54 5.15% 0.58% 4.68% 0.14% Agency MBS (0 to 5 years) 3.03 5.14% 0.30% 3.49% (1.01%) Taxable Municipals 2.25 4.87% 0.43% 3.40% 0.16%
Master Indices (Maturities 1 Year or Greater)
U.S. Treasury 6.31 4.45% (0.94%) (0.19%) (2.82%)
Federal Agency 3.32 4.65% 0.09% 2.89% (1.01%)
U.S. Corporates, A-AAA rated 6.85 5.18% (0.32%) 3.62% (1.98%) Agency MBS (0 to 30 years) 5.63 5.05% (1.07%) 1.36% (2.93%) Taxable Municipals 8.94 5.10% (0.38%) 2.43% (3.01%)
Source: ICE BofAML Indices.

As of 03/31/2024 Returns for Periods ended 03/31/2024
Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized.

PFM Asset Management LLC | For Institutional Investor or Investment Professional Use Only – This material is not for inspection by, distribution to, or quotation to the general public.

ICE BofAML Index Returns
4 51
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
QUARTERLY MARKET SUMMARY Fixed Income Management
Disclosures
PFM Asset Management LLC (“PFMAM”) is an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. (“USBAM”). USBAM is a subsidiary of U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”). U.S. Bank is a separate entity and subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. U.S.

Bank is not responsible for and does not guarantee the products, services or performance of PFMAM.

The views expressed within this material constitute the perspective and judgment of PFM Asset Management LLC at the time of distribution and are subject to change.

Information is obtained from sources generally believed to be reliable and available to the public; however, PFM Asset Management LLC cannot guarantee its accuracy, completeness, or suitability. The information contained in this report is not an offer to purchase or sell any securities.

NOT FDIC INSURED : NO BANK GUARANTEE : MAY LOSE VALUE
Further distribution is not permitted without prior written consent.

PFM Asset Management LLC | For Institutional Investor or Investment Professional Use Only – This material is not for inspection by, distribution to, or quotation to the general public. 5 52
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
Portfolio Review:

CITY OF OAKLEY
6 53
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Compliance
|
Note: Pre- and post-trade compliance for the account(s) managed by PFM Asset Management is provided via Bloomberg Asset and Investment Management ("AIM").

Certificate of Compliance
During the reporting period for the quarter ended March 31, 2024, the account(s) managed by PFM Asset Management ("PFMAM") were in compliance with the applicable investment policy and guidelines as furnished to PFMAM.

Acknowledged : PFM Asset Management LLC
7 54
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Account Summary
|
Account Summary

1. Yield at market, yield on cost, and portfolio duration only include investments held within the separately managed account(s), excludes balances invested in overnight funds.

The current 7-day yield is the net change, exclusive of capital changes and income other than investment income, in the value of a hypothetical fund account with a balance of one share over the seven-day base period including the statement date, expressed as a percentage of the value of one share (normally $1.00 per share) at the beginning of the seven-day period. This resulting net change in account value is then annualized by multiplying it by 365 and dividing the result by 7. The yields quoted should not be considered a representation of the yield of the fund in the future, since the yield is not fixed.

2. City of Oakley - City of Oakley - 6111-01
Portfolio Values March 31, 2024CAMP Managed Account $26,797,119 CAMP Pool $710,383
Amortized Cost $27,712,013
Market Value $26,797,119
Accrued Interest $98,117
Cash $0
Analytics¹ March 31, 2024Yield at Market 4.73%
Yield on Cost 2.27%Portfolio Duration 2.09
CAMP Pool7-Day Yield 5.48%
8 55
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Account Summary
|
Account Summary
CAMP Managed Account $26,895,236CAMP Pool $710,383Total Program $27,605,619 Consolidated Summary
Sector Allocation

2.6% 1.1% 0.0%

8.9%

14.5%

29.8%

14.0%

11.0%

18.2%

0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
$0$2$4$6$8
$10
Millions
Under
30 days
31 to 60
days
61 to 90
days
91 to
180 days
181 days
to 1 year
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 4 years
4 to 5 years
5 to 7 years
7 to 10
years
Over 10
years
Maturity Distribution
(Weighted Average Maturity: 796 Days)

1. Account summary and sector allocation include market values, accrued interest, and overnight balances. Maturity distribution includes market values and excludes accrued interest and overnight balances U.S. Treasury | 82%Corporate | 15%Joint Powers Authority | 3% 9 56
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Portfolio Snapshot
|
Total market value includes accrued interest and balances invested in CAMP, as of March 31, 2024.Yield and duration calculations exclude balances invested in CAMP.The portfolio’s benchmark is the ICE BofA 1-5 Year U.S. Treasury Index. Source: Bloomberg.

An average of each security’s credit rating was assigned a numeric value and adjusted for its relative weighting in the portfolio.

1. Portfolio Snapshot - CAMP-CITY OF OAKLEY¹
Credit Quality - S&P
28% 28%
14%
18%
11%
5%
34%
27%
22%
12%
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%
0-1 Yr 1-2 Yrs 2-3 Yrs 3-4 Yrs 4-5 Yrs
Portfolio Benchmark
Duration Distribution
U.S. Treasury | 82%Corporate | 15%Joint Powers Authority | 3% Sector Allocation
AAAm | 3%AA+ | 85%AA | 3%AA- | 1%A+ | 3%A | 3%A- | 3%
BBB+ | 1%
Portfolio Statistics
Portfolio Effective Duration 2.09 years
Benchmark Effective Duration 2.52 yearsPortfolio Credit Quality AA Yield At Market 4.73%
Yield At Cost 2.27%
Total Market Value $27,605,619.19
Managed Account Sub-Total $26,797,119.11Pool $710,383.07 Accrued Interest $98,117.01
10 57
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Portfolio Characteristics
|
$0.0$5.8
$11.6
$17.4$23.2$29.0
Millions
March 2024
$0.0$5.8
$11.6
$17.4$23.2$29.0
Millions
December 2023
$0.0$5.8
$11.6
$17.4$23.2$29.0
Millions
September 2023
$0.0$5.8
$11.6
$17.4$23.2$29.0
Millions
June 2023
Sector Allocation Review
U.S. Treasury Corporate Joint Powers Authority
Market values, excluding accrued interest. Only includes fixed-income securities held within the separately managed account(s) and LGIPs managed by PFMAM. Detail may not add to total due to rounding.

Security Type Jun-23 % of Total Sep-23 % of Total Dec-23 % of Total Mar-24 % of Total U.S. Treasury $23.0 79.6% $20.6 77.6% $19.1 68.6% $22.7 82.3%Corporate $4.1 14.0% $4.0 15.2% $4.1 14.9% $4.1 15.1%Joint Powers Authority $1.9 6.4% $1.9 7.2% $4.6 16.5% $0.7 2.6%Total $28.9 100.0% $26.6 100.0% $27.8 100.0% $27.5 100.0% 11 58
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Portfolio Activity
|
Portfolio Activity
Net Activity by Sector
($ millions)
U.S. TreasuryU.S. Treasury
($4.0) ($2.0) $0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0
Based on total proceeds (principal and accrued interest) of buys, sells, maturities, and principal paydowns. Detail may not add to total due to rounding.

Sector Net ActivityU.S. Treasury $3,552,544Total Net Activity $3,552,544 Sales/Maturities Purchases
12 59
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Portfolio Performance
|

1. The lesser of 10 years or since inception is shown. Since inception returns for periods one year or less are not shown. Performance inception date is December 31, 2021.2. Interest earned calculated as the ending accrued interest less beginning accrued interest, plus net interest activity.3. Returns for periods one year or less are presented on a periodic basis. Returns for periods greater than one year are presented on an annualized basis.4. The portfolio’s benchmark is the ICE BofA 1-5 Year U.S. Treasury Index. Source: Bloomberg. -1.0%

0.0%1.0%2.0%3.0%4.0%
Return
Portfolio Benchmark Net of Fees
Portfolio Performance
Market Value Basis Earnings 3 Months 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years Since Inception¹ Interest Earned² $146,209 $465,379 - - $785,677
Change in Market Value $67,605 $560,876 - - ($538,752)
Total Dollar Return $213,814 $1,026,255 - - $246,925
Total Return³
Portfolio 0.72% 3.54% - - 0.03%Benchmark⁴ -0.02% 2.42% - - -0.53%Basis Point Fee 0.02% 0.10% - - 0.10%Net of Fee Return 0.69% 3.44% - - -0.07% 3 Months 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years Since Inception
13 60
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Portfolio Performance
|

1. The lesser of 10 years or since inception is shown. Performance inception date is December 31, 2021.2. Interest earned calculated as the ending accrued interest less beginning accrued interest, plus net interest activity.3. Realized gains / (losses) are shown on an amortized cost basis.

Accrual Basis Earnings
Accrual Basis EarningsInterest Earned²Realized Gains / (Losses)³Change in Amortized CostTotal Earnings 3 Months
$146,209- $31,099
$177,308
1 Year
$465,379- $137,766$603,145
3 Years---- 5 Year---- Since Inception¹ $785,677 ($21,947) $247,984 $1,011,714 14 61
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com |
Portfolio Holdings and Transactions
15 62
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Portfolio Summary
|
Ratings shown are calculated by assigning a numeral value to each security rating, then calculating a weighted average rating for each security type / issuer category using all available security ratings,excluding Not-Rated (NR) ratings. For security type / issuer categories where a rating from the applicable NRSRO is not available, a rating of NR is assigned. Includes accrued interest and excludes balancesinvested in overnight funds.

Issuer Diversification
Security Type / Issuer Market Value (%) S&P / Moody's / FitchU.S. Treasury 84.5% UNITED STATES TREASURY 84.5% AA / Aaa / AA
Corporate 15.5%
3M COMPANY 0.8% BBB / A / A
AMAZON.COM INC 2.6% AA / A / AAAPPLE INC 1.4% AA / Aaa / NR BANK OF AMERICA CO 1.6% A / A / AABRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO 0.8% A / A / NRBURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE 0.8% AA / A / NR COMCAST CORP 0.7% A / A / AGOOGLE INC 1.1% AA / Aa / NRJP MORGAN CHASE & CO 0.8% A / A / AAMASTERCARD INC 0.8% A / Aa / NRSTATE STREET CORPORATION 1.5% A / A / AATARGET CORP 0.8% A / A / ATEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 1.0% A / Aa / NR TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 0.8% A / A / A
Total 100.0%
16 63
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Portfolio Composition
|
Issuer Distribution
As of March 31, 2024
Issuer Market Value ($) % of PortfolioUNITED STATES TREASURY 22,658,251 82.37%CAMP POOL 710,383 2.58% AMAZON.COM INC 689,399 2.51%
BANK OF AMERICA CO 426,320 1.55%STATE STREET CORPORATION 413,744 1.50% APPLE INC 382,504 1.39%
GOOGLE INC 281,897 1.02%TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 268,366 0.98%MASTERCARD INC 218,525 0.79%TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 213,503 0.78%JP MORGAN CHASE & CO 211,911 0.77%BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO 210,082 0.76%TARGET CORP 208,802 0.76%3M COMPANY 208,183 0.76%BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE 205,362 0.75%COMCAST CORP 200,272 0.73% Grand Total 27,507,502 100.00%
17 64
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Portfolio Holdings
|
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
Security Type/DescriptionDated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par S&P
Rating
Moody's
Rating
Settle
Date
Original
Cost
Trade
Date
YTM
at Cost
Accrued
Interest
Market
Value
Amortized
Cost
U.S. Treasury
US TREASURY NOTESDTD 09/15/2021 0.375% 09/15/2024
91282CCX7 2,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/13/2021 10/14/2021 2,482,617.19 0.62 433.08 2,497,279.35 2,445,703.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 11/15/2021 0.750% 11/15/2024
91282CDH1 2,050,000.00 AA+ Aaa 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 1,984,496.09 1.99 5,828.98 2,034,682.16 1,994,265.63 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 03/31/2020 0.500% 03/31/2025
912828ZF0 1,425,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/13/2021 10/14/2021 1,413,087.89 0.75 19.47 1,421,569.61 1,362,878.84 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 05/31/2020 0.250% 05/31/2025
912828ZT0 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 944,687.50 2.04 840.16 979,942.14 946,875.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 09/30/2020 0.250% 09/30/2025
91282CAM3 2,320,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/13/2021 10/14/2021 2,264,265.63 0.87 15.85 2,298,931.10 2,167,750.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 1,490,000.00 AA+ Aaa 5/2/2022 5/3/2022 1,352,349.61 3.00 936.37 1,422,632.75 1,377,551.49 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 03/31/2021 0.750% 03/31/2026
91282CBT7 1,835,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/13/2021 10/14/2021 1,816,721.68 0.98 37.60 1,826,820.20 1,700,242.19 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
91282CCF6 930,000.00 AA+ Aaa 6/6/2022 6/7/2022 850,732.03 3.04 2,344.06 886,931.43 856,762.50 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
91282CCZ2 2,510,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/13/2021 10/14/2021 2,487,939.45 1.06 60.01 2,498,896.68 2,296,650.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 04/30/2020 0.500% 04/30/2027
912828ZN3 835,000.00 AA+ Aaa 8/3/2022 8/4/2022 744,813.48 2.96 1,754.88 776,404.83 741,584.38 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 08/15/2017 2.250% 08/15/2027
9128282R0 875,000.00 AA+ Aaa 9/6/2022 9/7/2022 826,567.38 3.48 2,487.98 841,932.58 816,894.58 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2028
91282CGH8 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 3/1/2024 3/5/2024 969,921.88 4.34 5,865.38 970,490.98 970,625.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 04/30/2023 3.500% 04/30/2028
91282CHA2 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 2/22/2024 2/26/2024 966,484.38 4.39 14,711.54 967,253.59 970,000.00 US TREASURY NOTESDTD 07/31/2023 4.125% 07/31/2028
91282CHQ7 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 2/15/2024 2/16/2024 995,039.06 4.25 6,912.77 995,176.27 994,062.50 US TREASURY N/B NOTESDTD 10/31/2023 4.875% 10/31/2028
91282CJF9 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 2/22/2024 2/26/2024 1,021,953.13 4.35 20,491.07 1,021,544.75 1,025,156.20 18 65
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Portfolio Holdings
|
Security Type/DescriptionDated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par S&P
Rating
Moody's
Rating
Settle
Date
Original
Cost
Trade
Date
YTM
at Cost
Accrued
Interest
Market
Value
Amortized
Cost
U.S. Treasury
US TREASURY N/B NOTESDTD 01/31/2024 4.000% 01/31/2029
91282CJW2 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 2/15/2024 2/16/2024 990,585.94 4.21 6,703.30 990,797.89 989,843.80 US TREASURY N/B NOTESDTD 02/29/2024 4.250% 02/28/2029
91282CKD2 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 3/1/2024 3/5/2024 999,492.19 4.26 3,695.65 999,498.91 1,001,406.20 Security Type Sub-Total 23,770,000.00 23,111,754.51 2.28 73,138.15 23,430,785.22 22,658,251.31 Joint Powers Authority
CAMP Pool 710,383.07 AAAm NR 710,383.07 0.00 710,383.07 710,383.07Security Type Sub-Total 710,383.07 710,383.07 0.00 710,383.07 710,383.07 Corporate
AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE
NOTESDTD 05/12/2021 0.450% 05/12/2024
023135BW5 300,000.00 AA A1 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 290,007.00 2.04 521.25 299,480.06 298,239.60 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORPNOTESDTD 02/13/2020 1.800% 02/13/2025 89236TGT6 220,000.00 A+ A1 10/13/2021 10/15/2021 225,425.20 1.04 528.00 221,417.60 213,502.96 3M COMPANY (CALLABLE) CORPNOTESDTD 08/26/2019 2.000% 02/14/2025 88579YBH3 215,000.00 BBB+ A3 10/13/2021 10/15/2021 222,221.85 0.97 561.39 216,752.23 208,182.78 MASTERCARD INC CORP NOTES(CALLABLE)DTD 12/03/2019 2.000% 03/03/2025 57636QAN4 225,000.00 A+ Aa3 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 222,387.75 2.41 350.00 224,189.55 218,524.50 BURLINGTN NORTH SANTA FE CORPNOTES (CALDTD 03/09/2015 3.000% 04/01/2025 12189LAV3 210,000.00 AA- A3 10/13/2021 10/15/2021 223,351.80 1.12 3,150.00 213,127.55 205,361.94 AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE
NOTESDTD 04/13/2022 3.000% 04/13/2025
023135CE4 400,000.00 AA A1 4/11/2022 4/13/2022 399,364.00 3.06 5,600.00 399,781.23 391,159.20

APPLE INC (CALLABLE) CORP NOTES
DTD 05/11/2020 1.125% 05/11/2025
037833DT4 400,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/13/2021 10/15/2021 401,944.00 0.99 1,750.00 400,572.21 382,504.00 19 66
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Portfolio Holdings
|
Security Type/DescriptionDated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par S&P
Rating
Moody's
Rating
Settle
Date
Original
Cost
Trade
Date
YTM
at Cost
Accrued
Interest
Market
Value
Amortized
Cost
Corporate
COMCAST CORP (CALLABLE)CORPORATE NOTESDTD 05/27/2015 3.375% 08/15/2025 20030NBN0 205,000.00 A- A3 10/13/2021 10/15/2021 221,514.80 1.22 884.06 210,164.03 200,271.68 BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COCORPORATE NOTESDTD 11/13/2020 0.750% 11/13/2025 110122DN5 225,000.00 A A2 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 210,096.00 2.66 646.88 218,416.84 210,081.60 BANK OF AMERICA CORP(CALLABLE) CORPORATDTD 02/13/2020 2.015% 02/13/2026 06051GHY8 220,000.00 A- A1 10/13/2021 10/15/2021 225,106.20 1.46 591.07 221,334.24 213,110.70 STATE STREET CORP NOTES(CALLABLE)DTD 10/29/2020 2.901% 03/30/2026 857477BM4 215,000.00 A A1 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 215,483.75 2.84 17.33 215,158.20 209,305.73 STATE STREET CORP NOTES(CALLABLE)DTD 10/29/2020 2.901% 03/30/2026 857477BM4 210,000.00 A A1 10/13/2021 10/15/2021 222,541.20 1.51 16.92 213,607.33 204,438.15 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)DTD 04/15/2020 2.083% 04/22/2026 46647PBK1 220,000.00 A- A1 10/13/2021 10/15/2021 225,416.40 1.52 2,023.98 221,627.03 211,910.60

ALPHABET INC CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)DTD 08/09/2016 1.998% 08/15/2026
02079KAC1 300,000.00 AA+ Aa2 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 294,777.00 2.42 765.90 297,195.84 281,896.80 TARGET CORP CORP NOTES(CALLABLE)DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027 87612EBM7 200,000.00 A A2 3/14/2022 3/16/2022 194,764.00 2.53 823.33 196,978.77 185,602.20 TARGET CORP CORP NOTES(CALLABLE)DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027 87612EBM7 25,000.00 A A2 1/19/2022 1/24/2022 24,957.50 1.99 102.92 24,976.17 23,200.28 BANK OF AMERICA CORP NOTES(CALLABLE)DTD 10/21/2016 3.248% 10/21/2027 06051GGA1 225,000.00 A- A1 1/3/2023 1/5/2023 210,411.00 4.78 3,248.00 214,179.13 213,209.10 20 67
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Portfolio Holdings
|
Security Type/DescriptionDated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par S&P
Rating
Moody's
Rating
Settle
Date
Original
Cost
Trade
Date
YTM
at Cost
Accrued
Interest
Market
Value
Amortized
Cost
Corporate
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC CORPNOTES (CALLABDTD 11/03/2017 2.900% 11/03/2027 882508BC7 285,000.00 A+ Aa3 1/3/2023 1/5/2023 267,880.05 4.29 3,397.83 272,269.28 268,365.98 Security Type Sub-Total 4,300,000.00 4,297,649.50 2.19 24,978.86 4,281,227.29 4,138,867.80 Managed Account Sub Total 28,070,000.00 27,409,404.01 98,117.01 26,797,119.11Securities Sub TotalAccrued Interest $28,780,383.07 $28,119,787.08 $98,117.01 $27,507,502.18 $98,117.01
27,712,012.51
$28,422,395.58

2.27 2.27%
Total Investments $27,605,619.19
21 68
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Portfolio Activity
|
Quarterly Portfolio Transactions
Trade
Date
Settle
Date Par ($) CUSIP
Maturity
Date
Transact
Coupon Amount ($)
Yield
at Market
Realized
Security Description G/L (BV)
BUY2/15/2024 2/16/2024 1,000,000.00 91282CJW2 US TREASURY N/B NOTES 4.00% 1/31/2029 992,344.18 4.21%2/15/2024 2/16/2024 1,000,000.00 91282CHQ7 US TREASURY NOTES 4.12% 7/31/2028 996,852.25 4.25%2/22/2024 2/26/2024 1,000,000.00 91282CJF9 US TREASURY N/B NOTES 4.87% 10/31/2028 1,037,756.70 4.35%2/22/2024 2/26/2024 1,000,000.00 91282CHA2 US TREASURY NOTES 3.50% 4/30/2028 977,830.53 4.39%3/1/2024 3/5/2024 1,000,000.00 91282CGH8 US TREASURY NOTES 3.50% 1/31/2028 973,191.11 4.34%3/1/2024 3/5/2024 1,000,000.00 91282CKD2 US TREASURY N/B NOTES 4.25% 2/28/2029 1,000,069.64 4.26% Total BUY 6,000,000.00 5,978,044.41 0.00
INTEREST1/15/2024 1/15/2024 225,000.00 87612EBM7 TARGET CORP CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) 1.95% 1/15/2027 2,193.751/31/2024 1/31/2024 1,490,000.00 91282CBH3 US TREASURY NOTES 0.37% 1/31/2026 2,793.752/13/2024 2/13/2024 220,000.00 89236TGT6 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORP NOTES 1.80% 2/13/2025 1,980.002/13/2024 2/13/2024 220,000.00 06051GHY8 BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE) CORPORAT 2.01% 2/13/2026 2,216.502/14/2024 2/14/2024 215,000.00 88579YBH3 3M COMPANY (CALLABLE) CORP NOTES 2.00% 2/14/2025 2,150.002/15/2024 2/15/2024 300,000.00 02079KAC1 ALPHABET INC CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) 1.99% 8/15/2026 2,997.002/15/2024 2/15/2024 205,000.00 20030NBN0 COMCAST CORP (CALLABLE) CORPORATE NOTES 3.37% 8/15/2025 3,459.382/15/2024 2/15/2024 875,000.00 9128282R0 US TREASURY NOTES 2.25% 8/15/2027 9,843.753/3/2024 3/3/2024 225,000.00 57636QAN4 MASTERCARD INC CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) 2.00% 3/3/2025 2,250.00 22 69
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Portfolio Activity
|
Quarterly Portfolio Transactions
Trade
Date
Settle
Date Par ($) CUSIP
Maturity
Date
Transact
Coupon Amount ($)
Yield
at Market
Realized
Security Description G/L (BV)
INTEREST3/15/2024 3/15/2024 2,500,000.00 91282CCX7 US TREASURY NOTES 0.37% 9/15/2024 4,687.503/30/2024 3/30/2024 425,000.00 857477BM4 STATE STREET CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) 2.90% 3/30/2026 6,164.633/31/2024 3/31/2024 2,320,000.00 91282CAM3 US TREASURY NOTES 0.25% 9/30/2025 2,900.003/31/2024 3/31/2024 1,425,000.00 912828ZF0 US TREASURY NOTES 0.50% 3/31/2025 3,562.503/31/2024 3/31/2024 1,835,000.00 91282CBT7 US TREASURY NOTES 0.75% 3/31/2026 6,881.253/31/2024 3/31/2024 2,510,000.00 91282CCZ2 US TREASURY NOTES 0.87% 9/30/2026 10,981.25 Total INTEREST 14,990,000.00 65,061.26 0.00
MATURITY3/31/2024 3/31/2024 2,400,000.00 912828W71 US TREASURY NOTES 2.12% 3/31/2024 2,425,500.00 Total MATURITY 2,400,000.00 2,425,500.00 0.00
23 70
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Appendix
|
Important Disclosures
This material is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide specific advice or a specific recommendation, as it was prepared without regard to any specific objectives or financial circumstances.Investment advisory services are provided by PFM Asset Management LLC ("PFMAM"), an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. ("USBAM"). USBAM is a subsidiary of U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank"). U.S. Bankis a separate entity and subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bank is not responsible for and does not guarantee the products, services or performance of PFMAM. The information contained is not an offer to purchase or sell any securities. Additional applicable regulatory information is available upon request.PFMAM professionals have exercised reasonable professional care in the preparation of this performance report. Information in this report is obtained from sourcesexternal to PFMAM and is generally believed to be reliable and available to the public; however, we cannot guarantee its accuracy, completeness or suitability. We rely on the client's custodian for security holdings and market values. Transaction dates reported by the custodian may differ from money manager statements. While efforts are made to ensure the data contained herein is accurate and complete, we disclaim all responsibility for any errors that may occur. References to particular issuers arefor illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be recommendations or advice regarding such issuers. Fixed income manager and index characteristics are gathered from external sources. When average credit quality is not available, it is estimated by taking the market value weights of individual credit tiers on the portion ofthe strategy rated by a NRSRO.It is not possible to invest directly in an index. The index returns shown throughout this material do not represent the results of actual trading of investor assets.

Third-party providers maintain the indices shown and calculate the index levels and performance shown or discussed. Index returns do not reflect payment of any salescharges or fees an investor would pay to purchase the securities they represent. The imposition of these fees and charges would cause investment performance to belower than the performance shown.The views expressed within this material constitute the perspective and judgment of PFMAM at the time of distribution and are subject to change. Any forecast,projection, or prediction of the market, the economy, economic trends, and equity or fixed-income markets are based upon certain assumptions and current opinion asof the date of issue and are also subject to change. Some, but not all assumptions are noted in the report. Assumptions may or may not be proven correct as actualevents occur, and results may depend on events outside of your or our control. Changes in assumptions may have a material effect on results. Opinions and datapresented are not necessarily indicative of future events or expected performance.For more information regarding PFMAM's services or entities, please visit www.pfmam.com.© 2023 PFM Asset Management LLC. Further distribution is not permitted without prior written consent. 24 71
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Appendix
|
Important Disclosures
This information is for institutional investor use only, not for further distribution to retail investors, and does not represent an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buyor sell any fund or other security. Investors should consider the Trust's investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses before investing in the Trust. This and otherinformation about the Trust is available in the Trust's current Information Sheet, which should be read carefully before investing. A copy of the Trust's information Statement may be available by calling 1-800-729-7665 or is available on the Trust's website at www.camponline.com. While the Cash Reserve Portfolio seeks tomaintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share and the CAMP TERM Portfolio seeks to achieve a net asset value of $1.00 per share at the stated maturity, it is possible to lose money investing in the Trust. An investment in the Trust is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any othergovernment agency. Shares of the Trust are distributed by PFM Fund Distributors, Inc., member Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) (www.finra.org) andSecurities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) (www.sipc.org). PFM Fund Distributors, Inc. is an affiliate of PFM Asset Management LLC.

Market values that include accrued interest are derived from closing bid prices as of the last business day of the month as supplied by Refinitiv, Bloomberg, or Telerate. Where prices are not available from generally recognized sources, the securities are priced using a yield-based matrix system to arrive at an estimatedmarket value.

In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, information is presented on a trade date basis; forward settling purchases are included in the monthly balances, and forward settling sales are excluded.

Performance is presented in accordance with the CFA Institute's Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). Unless otherwise noted, performance is showngross of fees. Quarterly returns are presented on an unannualized basis. Returns for periods greater than one year are presented on an annualized basis. Past performance is not indicative of future returns.

Bank of America/Merrill Lynch Indices provided by Bloomberg Financial Markets.Money market fund/cash balances are included in performance and duration computations.Standard & Poor's is the source of the credit ratings. Distribution of credit rating is exclusive of money market fund/LGIP holdings.Callable securities in the portfolio are included in the maturity distribution analysis to their stated maturity date, although, they may be called prior to maturity.MBS maturities are represented by expected average life. 25 72
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Appendix
|
Glossary
Accrued Interest: Interest that is due on a bond or other fixed income security since the last interest payment was made.Agencies: Federal agency securities and/or Government-sponsored enterprises.Amortized Cost: The original cost of the principal of the security is adjusted for the amount of the periodic reduction of any discount or premium from the purchase date until the date of the report. Discount or premium with respect to short-term securities (those with less than one year to maturity at time of issuance) is amortized on a straight line basis. Such discount or premium with respect to longer-term securities is amortized using the constant yield basis.

Asset-Backed Security: A financial instrument collateralized by an underlying pool of assets – usually ones that generate a cash flow from debt, such as loans, leases, credit card balances, and receivables.

Bankers’ Acceptance: A draft or bill or exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill as well as the insurer.Commercial Paper: An unsecured obligation issued by a corporation or bank to finance its short-term credit needs, such as accounts receivable and inventory.Contribution to Total Return: The weight of each individual security multiplied by its return, then summed for each sector to determine how much each sector addedor subtracted from the overall portfolio performance.Effective Duration: A measure of the sensitivity of a security’s price to a change in interest rates, stated in years.Effective Yield: The total yield an investor receives in relation to the nominal yield or coupon of a bond. Effective yield takes into account the power of compoundingon investment returns, while nominal yield does not.FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. A federal agency that insures bank deposits to a specified amount.Interest Rate: Interest per year divided by principal amount and expressed as a percentage.Market Value: The value that would be received or paid for an investment in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.Maturity: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable.Negotiable Certificates of Deposit: A CD with a very large denomination, usually $1 million or more, that can be traded in secondary markets.Par Value: The nominal dollar face amount of a security.Pass-through Security: A security representing pooled debt obligations that passes income from debtors to its shareholders. The most common type is themortgage-backed security. 26 73
© PFM Asset Management LLC pfmam.com
City of Oakley
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2024
Appendix
|
Glossary
Repurchase Agreements: A holder of securities sells these securities to an investor with an agreement to repurchase them at a fixed price on a fixed date.Settle Date: The date on which the transaction is settled and monies/securities are exchanged. If the settle date of the transaction (i.e., coupon payments andmaturity proceeds) occurs on a non-business day, the funds are exchanged on the next business day.Supranational: A multinational union or association in which member countries cede authority and sovereignty on at least some internal matters to the group, whosedecisions are binding on its members.Trade Date: The date on which the transaction occurred; however, the final consummation of the security transaction and payment has not yet taken place.Unsettled Trade: A trade which has been executed; however, the final consummation of the security transaction and payment has not yet taken place.U.S. Treasury: The department of the U.S. government that issues Treasury securities.Yield: The rate of return based on the current market value, the annual interest receipts, maturity value, and the time period remaining until maturity, stated as a percentage on an annualized basis.

YTM at Cost: The yield to maturity at cost is the expected rate of return based on the original cost, the annual interest receipts, maturity value, and the time periodfrom purchase date to maturity, stated as a percentage on an annualized basis.YTM at Market: The yield to maturity at market is the rate of return based on the current market value, the annual interest receipts, maturity value, and the timeperiod remaining until maturity, stated as a percentage on an annualized basis. 27 74
75 STAFF REPORT

City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: May 14,2024
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Jeri Tejeda, Administrative Service Director
SUBJECT: City of Oakley as Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency – Quarterly Investment Report (3rd Quarter FY 23/24) Background and Analysis
California law and the City’s Investment Policy require the Agency’s fiscal officer to submit a quarterly investment report to the Agency’s governing board. The report should contain information on all securities held and include a statement denoting the ability of the local agency to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

Fiscal Impact
The Investment Report for the Period Ending March 31, 2024, attached shows a balance of $1,282,754.78 in cash for operations before the City receives the next distribution from the Department of Finance requested with the ROPS. To increase annual cash flow savings of refunding bonds, cash reserves were applied to bond insurance with Build America Mutual (BAM). The Reserve Requirements are satisfied in face amounts of $571,000.00 for 2015 Bonds and $1,827,318.76 for 2018 Bonds.

The Agency is in compliance with the City’s annually adopted investment policy. The tax revenues distributed to the Agency is sufficient to make the Agency’s enforceable obligation payments as approved by the Department of Finance.

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council, as the Board of the Successor Agency, accept the investment report for the 3rd Quarter of Fiscal Year 23/24.

Attachments

1. City of Oakley as Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2024.

Approved and
Forwarded to the
City Council
76 77

STAFF REPORT

City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: May 14, 2024
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Approving the 2024 Oakley Regional Park Master Plan, Capital Improvement Program Project No. 176
Background and Analysis
The City’s adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget designates funding for various infrastructure repair and replacement projects. This is consistent with the City’s goals to improve the quality of the City’s public park, street, and facility infrastructure and to enhance the quality of life for Oakley residents.

One of the key projects in the City’s CIP is the phased construction of the Oakley Regional Park. This project will transform a 55-acre site at the north end of Sellers Avenue that was deeded to the City as part of the development agreements related to the Emerson and Gilbert Ranch Subdivision projects. This site will be a key feature of the City’s Park network and a major destination point for the residents and visitors to Oakley.

Over the past 9 years, the City undertook a process to develop concept plans for the future design and development of the Oakley Regional Park site, and 2 Master Plans were developed and approved in 2016 and 2019.

The election of the new City Council in 2020 and subsequent creation of the City of Oakley Strategic Plan 27+ with new perspectives, brought up the need to create a new plan that is in accordance with the new City Council vision and Strategic Plan 27+.

A workgroup of staff, consultants, and stakeholders worked over several months to develop a new concept plan for the construction of this future park that would accommodate the park and recreational needs of the community for years to come.

Extensive community outreach was performed to solicit input from all interested parties.

This new concept plan was refined several times during 2023 and 2024 to its final form which incorporates new recreational uses at this site that include camping, fishing, and boating amenities among other traditional park uses.

Staff will use the 2024 Oakley Regional Park Master Plan as an opportunity to promote this unique and special project further and work with the City’s Grant writing consultant to pursue new grant opportunities to design and construct the Oakley Regional Park over the coming years.

Approved and
Forwarded to the
City Council
78 STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 2
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
This item is consistent with the Strategic Plan 27+ Parks and Open Space goals.

Fiscal Impact
There is no immediate financial impact on the City’s budget at this time. This project is anticipated to cost over $125M to design and construct, which will span several years/decades depending on the availability of the State grants for such a park project and the City’s ability to secure such grants.

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the final 2024 Oakley Regional Park Master Plan.

Attachments

1. Resolution

2. 2024 Oakley Regional Park Master Plan
79 Resolution No. __-24 Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. __-24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY
APPROVING THE 2024 OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
WHEREAS, as part of the Fiscal Year 2023/24 Budget, the City of Oakley approved a 5-Year Capital improvement Program (CIP); and WHEREAS, CIP Project Number 176 is to design and construct the improvements for the future Oakley Regional Park Project; and
WHEREAS, Callander Associates has been the project landscape architect and involved in the last round of park master planning in 2019; and WHEREAS, Callander Associates in collaboration with City Officials, Staff, residents, and stakeholders worked during 2023 on the creation of a new Oakley Regional Park Master Plan that is in conformance with the Strategic Plan 27+ Park and Open Space, attached here as Exhibit A; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the 2024 Oakley Regional Park Master Plan and authorizes Staff to pursue and apply for grant funding for the design and construction of this project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oakley at a meeting held on the 14th of May, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTIONS:

APPROVED:

_______________________
ATTEST: Anissa Williams, Mayor
______
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
80 OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK
MAY 14, 2024

MASTER PLAN

CITY OF OAKLEY
81 82

OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK

MASTER PLAN
Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture. Inc
prepared by
MAY 14, 2024
83 OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Mayor and City Council
Anissa Williams, Mayor
Shannon Shaw, Vice Mayor
Hugh Henderson, Council Member
Dr. George Fuller, Council Member
Aaron Meadows, Council Member
City Staff
Joshua McMurray, City Manager
Danielle Navarro, Assistant City Manager
Kevin Rohani, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Billilee Saengchalern, Engineering Manager
Jesse Dela Cruz, Public Works Maintenance Manager
Troy Faulk, Recreation Manager
Consultant Team
Brian Fletcher, Principal
Zach Katz, Project Manager
Dania Castro, Job Captain
84 1. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND .......................................................................... 3 • Introduction
• Site Context
• History
• 2019 Master Plan Summary
• Current Master Plan Goals

2. SITE UNDERSTANDING .......................................................................................... 9 • Existing Conditions
• Site Reconnaissance and Analysis
• Opportunities & Constraints

3. OUTREACH PROCESS .......................................................................................... 13 • Overview
• Public Outreach
• Stakeholder and Committee Meetings
• Survey Data Collection

4. CONCEPT PLANS................................................................................................. 21 • Overview
• Design Alternatives
• Preferred Plan

5. IMPLEMENTATION ............................................................................................... 26 • Cost Estimate
• Funding Sources

6. APPENDIX .......................................................................................................... 28 • Appendix A - Meeting Summaries
• Appendix B - Survey Results Summaries
• Appendix C - Design Alternatives
• Appendix D - Preferred Master Plan
• Appendix E - Cost Estimates

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 1 85 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY
86 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Surrounded by newly restored tidal
marshes and a stone’s throw away from
hundreds of new housing units lies 55 acres
of unrealized opportunity. The Oakley
Regional Park site has the potential to
address the community’s current and
future recreational needs and draw visitors
throughout the region to generate revenue
that could help offset some of the ongoing
maintenance costs.

There have been a few design efforts to
date, but none have resulted in obtaining
grant funding to help realize any part of the
project. The goal of this project is to listen
and engage critical stakeholders and the
overall community early and throughout the
process to identify potential programmatic
elements and build a consensus for a park
vision.

The community engagement process
outlined in this master plan report employs
a variety of interactive methods and
events, maximizing participation from the
community and stakeholders. This inclusive
approach ensured valuable feedback
was collected, guiding the master plan’s
gradual development through stages.

Presented within this master plan is the
preferred plan, encapsulating a highlevel design concept complemented by a written description and general
recommendations. To facilitate funding,
the cost of improvements within the
preferred plan is delineated across phases
that allows items to be built independently
of one another to the maximum extent
possible so that the project could be
constructed as monies become available.

It’s important to note that the preferred
plan doesn’t commit to project approvals
or priorities. Instead, it serves as an
informative tool for the City, offering
insights into scopes and estimated costs
of potential projects. Final decisions will
remain independent to the City and will be
subject to environmental review as needed.

CITY OF OAKLEY 1
Site Photo - Existing conditions of Dutch Slough
87 01

INTRODUCTION &

BACKGROUND
88 CITY OF OAKLEY 3

1. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND
Introduction
Oakley Regional Park is one of the City’s
most sought after parks and has the
potential to: provide a multitude of
amenities for the community; host citywide
events; and attract national recreational
events throughout the year. The recent
development and growth within the City of
Oakley creates an appropriate opportunity
to update the Oakley Regional Park Master
Plan to meet the most current community
needs. The end result of the project will be a
master plan that will help guide future park
improvements, that maximizes potential
opportunities for grant funding, and
provides opportunities for partnerships to
reduce costs and maximize programming.

Site Photo - Drone footage of existing conditions
Site Context
Oakley Regional Park is located in the
City of Oakley at the north end of Sellers
Avenue. It is situated between the Emerson
and Gilbert parcel, along the Contra Costa
Canal and has a portion of Emerson slough
running through. The site, spanning over
55 acres, is a unique location for a future
regional park that can offer opportunities
for various activities, including recreational,
educational, passive leisure, and city-wide
programs and events.

History
For over a century, the site was used for
grazing and dairy operations. The Emerson
family, in particular, owned their land since
the mid-nineteenth century, operating the
89 4 OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
dairy farm until the early twentieth century.

The Burroughs family, who purchased the
land in 1906, managed it as a dairy farm
until 1974 when they sold a portion of their
property to the Gilbert family.

Afterwards, the Burroughs and Gilbert
parcels were used as range land for more
than two decades. The project site is
situated within Oakley’s city limits and inside
the County’s Urban Limit Line designated
as “M-8” for mixed-use development in the
1990 Contra Costa County General Plan.

Development agreements were recorded
in 1997 allowing for the construction of
4,100-6,000 residential units on the 1,700
acres owned by the Burroughs and Gilberts,
which included the property both north
and south of the Contra Costa Canal to
Cypress Road.

In 1999, when the City of Oakley
incorporated, it was obligated to
honor these development agreements.

Subsequently, in 2003, the Dutch Slough
Tidal Restoration Project site (north of the
Contra Costa Canal) was acquired by the
Department of Water Resources and from
there began the preparation and future
construction of the tidal restoration project.

As part of the renegotiated agreement with
the City of Oakley, the Emerson, Gilbert
and Burroughs families deeded 63 acres,
approximately 5 miles of trail easements,
and 55 acres upland at the end of Sellers
Ave. to the City of Oakley for a community
park.

The site represents a unique opportunity
to build a substantial new park for the
growing Oakley community. In 2006 the
City facilitated an outreach process that
culminated in the Dutch Slough Community
Park and Public Access Master Plan. Then
most recently in 2019, after additional
outreach, a master plan update was
produced.

Figure 1 - Location Map
NTS
E. Cypress Rd.

Main St.

Laurel Rd.

Sellers Ave.

Oakley Regional
Park
Big Break
Big Break Regional
Shoreline
Dutch Slough
90 CITY OF OAKLEY 5

1. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND
2019 Master Plan Summary
For the previous master plan, the City
conducted an extensive public outreach
campaign including workshops, public
meetings, and steering committee
meetings in order to create a new vision for
Oakley Regional Park. Once the planning
process was complete, development goals
were established based on the information
gathered. The following is a summary of
the goals and programmatic elements of
the 2019 Master Plan:
• Provide accessible and beneficial
park features to the local and regional
community.
• Provide a unique destination and programs.
• Provide opportunities for partnerships to
reduce costs and maximize programming.
• Provide connections to regional trail
network.

Figure 2 - Aerial of Oakley Regional Park Site
• Preserve agricultural history.
• Provide a community garden.
• Maximize revenue.
• Design a park so that it can be built in
phases.
• Develop a central meeting location for
community events and ceremonies.
• Provide a pavilion to hold concerts.
• Develop strong pedestrian circulation
through the site and between primary
features within the park.
• Include high quality multi-purpose sport
fields.
• Include field lighting for multi-purpose sports
fields.

Gilbert
Parcel
Emerson
Parcel
Burroughs
Parcel
Dutch Slough
Big Break
March Creek
Emerson Slough
Little Dutch Slough
Contra Costa Canal
Oakley
Regional Park
91 OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK ADVANCEMENT
MAY 28, 2019

ACTIVITY AREAS

1. MULTI-USE TURF FIELDS

2. LITTLE LEAGUE FIELD
(250’-300’ OUTFIELDS)

3. SOCCER FIELD (U-10)

4. LACROSSE FIELD

5. BOCCE BALL COURTS

6. DESTINATION PLAYGROUND

7. MULTI-USE TRAIL

8. MULTI-USE TRAIL + EQUESTRIAN

9. INTERPRETIVE NATURE TRAIL

10. OUTDOOR LEARNING/CLASSROOM

11. TRAIL KIOSK

12. KAYAK LAUNCH

13. BEACH RIVER FRONT

COMMUNITY GATHERING AREA

14. PICNIC MEADOW

15. OPEN MEADOW

16. GROUP PICNIC AREA - PLAY AREA

17. GROUP PICNIC AREA - FIELDS

18. SCORE KEEPERS BOOTH/SHELTER

19. SHADE STRUCTURE, TYP.

20. PAVILION

21. BOAT HOUSE

22. INTERPRETIVE CENTER

23. HISTORIC GILBERT HOUSE

24. EVENT LAWN

25. VISITOR/ADMIN BUILDING

26. COMMUNITY GARDEN

27. FARM ANIMAL PADDOCK

28. AGRICULTURAL FIELDS

29. AGRICULTURAL SUPPORT/BARN

30. CONCESSION/ RESTROOM
OTHER

31. PARK ENTRY

32. BRIDGE CROSSOVER

33. ACCESS ROAD, TYP.

34. GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD

35. MAINTENANCE BUILDING

36. PARKING, TYP.

37. TRAIL HEAD PARKING + EQUESTRIAN

MASTER PLAN

DUTCH SLOUGH

CONTRA COSTA CANAL

SELLERS AVENUE
0 40’ 80’ 160’
2 3
4 8
7 6
5 12
11 1
10 9

MASTER PLAN LEGEND

COOLCREST DRIVE

AMBERWIND CIRCLE

WILLOW WAY

BLUESTONE DRIVE
2 13
14 15
15 16
17 18
19 21
20 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
36 36
36 37
33 19
11 8
8 11
6 OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
• Provide security lighting and other security
features throughout the park.
• Provide seating and picnic areas.
• Provide a concessions/storage building for
the multi-purpose sports fields.
• Design park to accommodate a variety of
small and large gatherings and community
events.
• Design park for low maintenance and good
maintenance access.
• Use materials that are vandal resistant.
• Plan for summer/science camps utilizing the
park.
• Design a unique destination playground
with accessible features.
• Design more open spaces that can be used
for both passive and active recreation.

Figure 3 - 2019 Master Plan, Final Concept
• Include water front access into Emerson
Slough.
• Design a boat house for retail, rental and
mechanic space.
• Provide a kayak launch.
• Provide spaces for outdoor learning and
classrooms.
• Provide on site maintenance yard.
92 CITY OF OAKLEY 7

1. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND
Current Master Plan Goals
This master plan for Oakley Regional
Park seeks to develop a comprehensive
approach and achieve the following goals:
• Engage the community and
stakeholders to better understand
desired amenities and improvements.
• Explore opportunities for potential trail
connectivity.
• Study how a new park can benefit
and provide opportunities to the
community.
• Develop a master plan to guide the
future park’s vision.
• Provide a resource for potential grant
funding opportunities and partnerships.

These goals were achieved through an
extensive master planning process which
is described in the following sections. To
ensure the master plan was responsive to
current community needs and desires, a
series of meetings and online surveys were
organized to collect feedback from the
public and stakeholders to narrow down
the direction for the future Oakley Regional
Park.

Site Photo - 2022 Google street view off Sellers Ave.
93 02
SITE

UNDERSTANDING
94 CITY OF OAKLEY 9

2. SITE UNDERSTANDING
Overview
In the four years since the previous
preferred concept plan had been created,
significant changes have occurred within
both the community and the park site.

Oakley’s population has grown by 5%,
leading to evolving needs and desires
among residents. With ongoing residential
development near the park site, the
demand for recreation amenities has
reached unprecedented levels. Embracing
these transformations, the establishment
of a new park stands as a crucial step
towards meeting the community’s evolving
requirements.

Site Photo - 2015 image of Gilbert house
Site Photo - Drone footage of existing conditions
95 OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
MARCH 29, 2023
10 OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS PLAN Site Reconnaissance and Analysis
A site visit was conducted by the design
team to visually review apparent features
that existed within the project site. The
purpose of the visit was to familiarize the
team members with the location, condition
and context of the existing site. As certain
elements within the site had slowly been
demolished throughout the years, the City
of Oakley was able to provide the design
team with current aerial imagery to virtually
view the site to see what has changed and
had remained within the site today. All of
this information was cataloged for use
throughout the design process.

Opportunities and Constraints
Based on a detailed site analysis,
opportunities and constraints were
developed for the site and presented to
the public for input as follows:

Opportunities
• Potential connections to future trails
and trail on existing levees.
• Potential water access to Emerson
Slough.
• Potential fishing opportunities along
Emerson Slough.
• Utilize historical Gilbert House for
recreational events.

Constraints
• The only vehicular entry point is at
Sellers Ave.
• Possible sedimentation within Emerson
Slough.
• Grant Opportunities
Figure 4 - Opportunities and Constraints Plan
96 CITY OF OAKLEY 11

2. SITE UNDERSTANDING
(This page intentionally left blank)
97 03

OUTREACH

PROCESS
98 CITY OF OAKLEY 13

3. OUTREACH PROCESS
Overview
An essential part to a successful master
plan is receiving input during development
to ensure the plan represents the needs
and preferences of project stakeholders
and end users. The Oakley Regional Park
master plan is a product of feedback
received from the local community and
several stakeholder groups that were
engaged during a series of in-person
meetings and online surveys. The meetings
took place over several months where the
same participants had the opportunity
to monitor the progress and ensure their
voices were being heard.

The outreach process was designed to
gather broad preferences at first and
slowly refine the design documents in
response to the comments received. In
the beginning of the process, outreach
participants were encouraged to express
their ideas and desires based on the 2019
concept plan. Only after initial feedback
was received were design alternatives
prepared. The design alternatives were
eventually critiqued and refined into a
single preferred alternative, which was
further vetted through more review.

Components of the outreach process
are described in the following sections.

Summaries of outreach meetings are
provided in Appendix A.

Public Outreach
Graphics Displays
To augment the meetings described
below, the City created a website for the
public to follow along and receive updates
on the master plan process. The website
provided all meeting announcements,
meeting minutes and graphics that were
presented. Additionally, meetings and
other opportunities for input through our
online survey were advertised through
several social media platforms.

Figure 5 - Project Process Diagram
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEPT
OCT

FINAL MASTER PLAN

DRAFT MASTER PLAN
OUTREACH EVENT & COMMUNITY MEETING #2
OUTREACH EVENT & COMMUNITY MEETING #1

PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT & MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVES
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
MAR

C I T Y C O U N C I L
MEETING #1

C I T Y C O U N C I L
MEETING #2

C I T Y C O U N C I L
MEETING #3
2023 2024
99 HELP PLAN
YOUR SHORELINE PARK!
• City Council Roll Call
WE WANT YOUR INPUT! MEETING AGENDA
The City of Oakley is hosting a Community

OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 29, 2023
7:00PM - 9:00PM
14 OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
Community Meeting #1
At the first community meeting, the City
and design team introduced the master
plan process by sharing the 2019 previous
efforts, project background and overall
goals. After reviewing a site analysis
showing opportunities and constraints, the
public was asked to vote on images that
represented potential site amenities that
they wanted to see in the forthcoming
concept plans. General comments and
ideas were also documented with written
notes and an online survey was advertised
for those who could not attend the inperson meeting.

Pop-up Events
In order to have a successful Oakley
outreach program it is necessary to get the
word out. In addition to announcements
delivered via the City’s website, social
media platforms, email newsletters, and
publications, the design team attended
the Friday Night Bites event on May 5,
2023 to engage with the community.

During the pop-up event, the design team
showcased graphics that were presented
at Community Meeting #1, along with
an additional board illustrating the online
survey results, collected feedback, and
advertised upcoming community meetings.

Community Meeting #2
At the second community meeting, the
community was presented two design
alternatives. The design alternatives
reflected the input received during the first
community meeting and from the online
survey. Preferences for each alternative
were collected in-person and through a
second online survey.

The key differences between the
alternatives are as follows:

Alternative 1 is designed with the direction
Figure 6 - Open House Handout
100
CITY OF OAKLEY 15

3. OUTREACH PROCESS
of it being more of a traditional park with
an emphasis on community gathering
spaces, walking paths, sports fields, courts
and a destination play area. A boat launch
and fishing piers off the Emerson Slough
was proposed within the northern part of
the park site to provide fishing and water
access for day users. Additional amenities
on the eastern portion of the site included
a community garden, outdoor classroom
space, a City corp yard and the restoration
of the existing Gilbert house.

While both Alternatives provide water
access out to the delta, Alternative 2 went
in the direction of creating a destination
camping experience. This design included
fewer sports fields, an inclusive nature
themed play area, community gathering
spaces, walking paths, dog park and
camping for both RV and tent users. A boat
launch and fishing pier was also included
within Alternative 2 but in a larger scale to
accommodate fishing tournaments and
trailer parking for overnight camp users. A
swimming area along the southern portion
of Emerson Slough was provided for non
boat users. Similar amenities were also
included within the eastern portion of the
site including the restoration of the existing
Gilbert house, City corp yard and with
the addition of providing retail incubator
spaces for local small businesses.

Both Alternatives are shown on the following
page, and are also provided in Appendix C.

City Council Meeting #2
After reviewing the feedback for both
alternatives, the direction for the preferred
plan became unclear as the final count
of community votes were equal for both
alternatives. This resulted in having an
additional meeting with City Council
to provide additional feedback and
for them to provide direction for the
preferred plan. However, based on
specific feedback that was mentioned
within both alternatives, a third alternative
was presented during the meeting to
assist the City with their decision and
was ultimately chosen by City Council.

Outreach Photo - Community meeting #1
101
16 OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN

OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
JULY 19, 2023
MASTER PLAN, ALTERNATIVE 1
0 40’ 80’ 160’
SELLERS AVE.

EMERSON SLOUGH
soccer field, U6, typ.
soccer field, 11v11 &
(2) U10
soccer field, ‘x’ & (2)
U12
baseball field, 90’
baseball field, 60’, typ.
shade structure
drop off zone
entry gateway
picnic & gathering area
multi-use trail, typ.
tennis/pickleball courts
restroom/concession
shaded bleachers, typ.
disc golf (9 holes), typ.
community garden
destination
play area
trail connection
city corp yard
park entry
orchard, typ.
shade structure/
restroom, typ.
shade structure/
outdoor classroom
gilbert house
gilbert house
event space
pedestrian bridge
parking lot, typ.
shoreline trail
restroom building
shaded picnic area &
outdoor classrooom
trailer/ trailhead
parking, typ.
trailhead restroom
trailhead entry
fishing deck,
typ.
overflow parking, typ.
boat launch
outdoor concert
lawn
shade pavilion, typ.
potential future trail
connection
potential future trail
connection

OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
JULY 19, 2023
MASTER PLAN, ALTERNATIVE 2
soccer field, U6, typ.
potential future trail
connection
soccer field, 11v11 &
(2) U10, typ.
baseball field, 90’, typ.
rv camp site, typ.
restroom /
concessions
sports field
entry & plaza
trail connection
shaded bleachers, typ.

SELLERS AVE.

EMERSON SLOUGH
park entry
vineyard, typ.
retail / incubator
space, typ.
(tasting rooms,
resturant, etc.)
gilbert house
gilbert house
event space
parking lot, typ.
trailer/ trailhead
parking, typ.
trailhead restroom
& bait shop
trailhead entry
fishing deck
restroom
building
picnic area/
shade
structure
swimming
area
boat launch
camping facilities &
registration office
nature themed
play area
outdoor stage
shoreline trail
potential future trail
connection
pedestrian bridge
tent camp site, dog park, typ.
typ.
city corp yard
0 40’ 80’ 160’

OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
JULY 19, 2023
MASTER PLAN, ALTERNATIVE 1
0 40’ 80’ 160’
SELL
tennis/pickleball courts
trail connection
p
outdoor classrooom

OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
JULY 19, 2023
MASTER PLAN, ALTERNATIVE 2
ccer field, U6, typ.
otential future trail
onnection
occer field, 11v11 &
2) U10, typ.
aseball field, 90’, typ.
camp site, typ.
restroom /
concessions
sports field
entry & plaza
trail connection
aded bleachers, typ.

SELLERS AVE.

EMERSON SLOUGH
park entry
vineyard, typ.
retail / incubator
space, typ.
(tasting rooms,
resturant, etc.)
gilbert house
gilbert house
event space
parking lot, typ.
trailer/ trailhead
parking, typ.
trailhead restroom
& bait shop
trailhead entry
fishing deck
restroom
building
picnic area/
shade
structure
swimming
area
boat launch
camping facilities &
registration office
nature themed
play area
outdoor stage
shoreline trail
potential future trail
connection
pedestrian bridge
tent camp site, dog park, typ.
typ.
city corp yard
0 40’ 80’ 160’
Figure 7 - Preliminary Design Alternatives
102
CITY OF OAKLEY 17
City Council Meeting #3
A presentation summarizing the entire
outreach process was presented to the
City Council along with the master plan
documents. The Council was asked to
provide comments on the draft master
plan, which were incorporated before the
final document was adopted.

Stakeholder and Committee Meetings
In addition to the community events and
meetings described above, the design
team gave presentations to several
stakeholder groups throughout the
outreach process. All of the groups were
asked to provide feedback, which was
combined with input received during
public outreach. The stakeholder groups
that were involved within the two meetings
the City had organized included:
• CA Department of Water Resources
• East Bay Regional Park District
• Contra Costa County Water District
• Reclamation District 2137
• City of Oakley Police Department
• Contra Costa County Fire Protection
District
The design team met with the stakeholders
in a virtual meeting to present the project
and collect comments. Although not
every member was present during the
stakeholder meetings, everyone that
received an invitation was provided with a
written meeting summary and encouraged
to fill out an online survey.

Survey Data Collection
In addition, as part of the outreach
process, a series of surveys were distributed
to collect community feedback which
guided the master plan development.

These surveys were provided to meeting
participants; and also advertised to the
general public through flyers, newsletters,
City publications, social media platforms
and the City’s website.

The initial survey was released the same
day as Community Meeting #1 and asked
participants to vote for their preferred park
Outreach Photo - Community Meeting #2
103
18 OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
amenities within an array of categories and
to also provide their own ideas for how they
would like the previous master plan to be
improved. By providing the community with
an online survey, we were able to reach over
300 participants.

The second survey was also released on the
same day as Community Meeting #2 and
provided a means of collecting comments
on the two design alternatives that were
presented during the in person meeting.

There were 162 participants for the second
online survey and each individual provided
detailed responses for both alternatives.

Once the votes had been tallied up, there
was an apparent tie between the two
alternatives and it became unclear as to
which alternative was preferred most. Due to
this, an additional alternative was presented
to the City Council, along with the original
two, and the top voted alternative was then
used to move forward with the preferred plan.

A summary of the survey results is presented
in Appendix B.

3. OUTREACH PROCESS
Figure 8 - Graph of survey data indicating public
preferences for possible active recreation amenities
Figure 9 - Online survey #1
Outreach Photo - Pop-up Event
104
CITY OF OAKLEY 19
(This page intentionally left blank)
105
04 CONCEPT PLANS
106

EMERSON SLOUGH
CITY OF OAKLEY 21

4. CONCEPT PLANS
Overview
The concept plan described in the
following sections is the product of the
outreach process and is intended to serve
as a general framework for the future
improvements of Oakley Regional Park. The
selection and placement of amenities is
based on the feedback received from the
public and stakeholders that participated
in the outreach meetings. The drawings
are not meant to show final designs for
improvements, but are recommendations
to provide general direction, programmatic
elements, and inspiration. Detailed design
development and feasibility studies would
be necessary prior to implementing
improvements.

Although the preferred plan is described
below, it was preceded by the design
alternatives, along with an additional
iteration which assisted in the direction of
the preferred plan. The design alternatives
are provided in Appendix C for reference.

Preferred Concept Plan
The preferred plan is shown in Appendix
D and described below. Based on the
feedback and input received throughout
the process, the preferred plan is a mix
of amenities from both alternatives and
emphasizes an outdoor nature theme. The
plan begins at the main entrance going
into the park off of Sellers Ave.

As one makes their way along the
Figure 10 - Traditional park amenities
107
potential future trail
connection
picnic area/shade
structure
pump track
rv camp site, typ.
picnic area/shade
structure
skate park restroom
flexible open
space/buffer
trail connection
perimeter nature trail,
typ.
disc golf, typ.
park entry
vineyard, typ.
retail / incubator
space, typ.
(tasting rooms,
resturant, restroom, etc.)
gilbert house
gilbert house
event space
parking lot, typ.
trailer/ trailhead
parking, typ.
trailhead restroom
& bait shop
trailhead entry
fishing deck
restroom building
picnic area/
shade structure
flexible event
space
swimming area
boat launch
camping facilities &
registration office
nature destination
play area
outdoor stage
shoreline trail
potential future trail
connection
pedestrian bridge
tent camp site,
typ.
city corp yard
picnic area/
shade structure
SELLERS AVE.

EMERSON SLOUGH
0 40’ 80’ 160’

CONTRA COSTA CANAL
OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN CITY OF OAKLEY 22

4. CONCEPT PLANS
Figure 11 - Preferred Master Plan
108

OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
DECEMBER 1, 2023

VICINITY MAP

LANDSCAPE PLANTING MATERIAL
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME Trees:

Arbutus marina / Strawberry Madrone
Lagerstroemia indica ‘Tuscarora’ / Red-pink crape myrtle Olea europaea ‘Swan Hill’ / Swan Hill Olive
Platanus acerifolia ‘Columbia’ / London Plan Tree
Quercus agrifolia coast / Live Oak
Zelkova serrata ‘Musashino’ / Saw Leaf Zelkova
Shrubs:

Achillea millefolium ‘Island Pink’ / Yarrow
Bouteloua gracilis ‘Blonde Ambition’ / Blue Grama
Cistus ‘Sunset’ / Rockrose
Cotinus coggygria ‘Royal Purple’ / Purple Smoke Bush
Cotoneaster dammeri ‘Lowfast’ / Bearberry Cotoneaster
Muhlenbergia rigens / Deer Grass
Nepeta x faassenii ‘Walker’s Low’ / Catmint
Perovskia atriplicifolia ‘Blue Spires’ / Russian Sage
Phormium tenax ‘Jack Spratt’ / New Zealand Flax
Rosa x ‘Noaschnee’ / White Carpet Rose
Rosmarinus officinalis ‘Collingwood Ingram’ / Dwarf Rosemary Salvia clevelandii ‘Winnifred Gilman’ / Cleveland Sage
Salvia leucantha ‘Santa Barbara’ / Mexican Bush Sage

GILBERT HOUSE

BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME
Trees:

Acer negundo / Box Elder
Alnus rhombifolia / White Elder
Populus fremontii / Fremont Cottonwood
Quercus lobata / Valley Oak
Shrubs :

Artemisia douglasiana / Mugwort
Cephalanthus occidentalis / Buttonbrush
Deschampsia cespitosa / Tufted Hairgrass
Muhlenbergia rigens / Deer Grass
Rosa californica / California Wild Rose
Salix lasiolepis / Arroyo Willow
RIPARIAN EDGE BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME Trees:

Quercus agrifolia / Coast Live Oak
Quercus lobata / Valley Oak
Shrubs:

Achillea millefolium ‘Island Pink’ / Yarrow
Baccharis pilularis ‘Twin Peaks’ / Dwarf Coyote Brush
Ceanothus gloriosus ‘Anchor Bay’ / Anchor Bay Ceanothus Heteromeles arbutifolia / Toyon
Muhlenbergia rigens / Deer Grass
Nassella pulchra / Purple Needlegrass
Rhamnus californica ‘Mound San Bruno’ / CoffeeBerry
Salvia ‘Bee’s Bliss’ Bee’s / Bliss sage
Salvia clevelandii ‘Winnifred Gilman’ / Cleveland Sage

NATURE EDGE
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME Trees:

Quercus lobata / Valley Oak
Shrubs:

Achillea millefolium ‘Island Pink’ / Yarrow
Deschampsia cespitosa / Tufted Hairgrass
eschscholzia californica / California Poppy
Muhlenbergia rigens / Deer Grass
Nassella pulchra / Purple Needlegrass
Salvia clevelandii ‘Winnifred Gilman’ / Cleveland Sage

OPEN MEADOW
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME Trees:

Acer rubrum ‘October Glory’ / Red Maple
Arbutus marina Strawberry / Madrone
Lagerstroemia indica ‘Tuscarora’ / Red-Pink Crape Myrtle Magnolia grandiflora ‘Little Gem’ / Dwarf Magnolia
Pistacia chinensis ‘Keith Davey’ / Fruitless Chinese Pistache Ulmus parvifolia ‘True Green’ / Chinese Evergreen Elm
Zelkova serrata ‘Musashino’ / Saw Leaf Zelkova
Shrubs:

Achillea millefolium ‘Island Pink’ / Yarrow
Callistemon viminalis ‘Little John’ / Dwarf Bottlebrush Chondropetalum tectorum / Cape Reed
Cistus ‘Sunset’ / Rockrose
Cotoneaster dammeri ‘Lowfast’ / Bearberry Cotoneaster
Chondopetalum tectorum / Cape Rush
Deschampsia cespitosa / Tufted Hairgrass
Dietes iridioides / Fortnight Lily
Juncus patens / California Rush
Muhlenbergia rigens / Deer Grass
Perovskia atriplicifolia ‘Blue Spires’ / Russian Sage
Salvia leucantha ‘Santa Barbara’ / Mexican Bush Sage
Teucrium fruticans ‘Compactum’ / Bush Germander

PARKING LOT
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME TURF 90/10 T a l l f e s c u e b y D e l t a B l u e g r a s s 1 1
3 3
3 5
2 2
4 4
4 4
6 6
5 5 5
5 23 OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
roundabout, the first exit heading north
will veer towards the east side of Emerson
Slough. Immediately to the right, the
City will be provided with a new corp
yard to consolidate and facilitate all
of the needs required to maintain not
only Oakley Regional Park but all of
the parks within the City of Oakley.

Continuing north alongside rows of
vineyard grape vines, the historically
restored Gilbert house sits at the end of
the street where it can be rented out for
private events and weddings. A pedestrian
bridge is also provided to enhance and
continue the parks strong circulation
throughout both sides of the park.

Heading east from the Gilbert house,
flexible retail incubator spaces are
provided within two buildings to provide
opportunities for an array of community
events, farmers markets, food truck
socials, and pop-up stores for small
local businesses. Being in close proximity
with the agricultural vineyards, learning
opportunities and resources can also be
provided for future master gardeners.

By taking the second exit within the
roundabout off of Sellers Ave, this portion
of the park enters into a unique destination
park that was influenced by the feedback
received from the community outreach.

The design for this portion of the park
switched gears to focus more in providing
a specialized camping experience with
water access and nature related activities.

While one of the main attractions within
the park provides an opportunity for
water access, the drawings shown
within the concept plan are intended
as recommendations. Feasibility, water
quality and environmental studies will
need to be completed for all water
related elements. The design provides a
boat and kayak launch for recreational
users to have access out into the delta.

This amenity gives the park the opportunity
to host tournaments and events that
are locally and nationally put together.

Figure 12 - Excert of Apendix D, landscape planting materials 109

CONTRA COSTA CANAL
CITY OF OAKLEY 24

4. CONCEPT PLANS
Figure 13 - Camping facilities
The design also provides water access for
non-boat users, by designing a beach front
swimming area for families to spend hot
summer days cooling off along the Emerson
slough. Restroom buildings and picnic
areas are also provided within this space.

Continuing on within the space near the
swimming area, traditional park amenities
are implemented for a variety of user
types. An all-abilities destination play
area was critical to the community and
stakeholders so the concept plan provides
the amount of space to thoroughly design
a nature themed play area that can
accommodate multiple opportunities
for inclusive play elements. Community
gathering spaces, open turf areas and
a shaded picnic area are also included
within this area which can provide
additional event spaces while providing
a picturesque view of the water front.

While the park has an array of amenities for
day use, a variety of overnight camping was
proposed to encourage affordable family
vacations and summer camp opportunities.

Both tent and RV camping locations are
provided with picnic tables and basic
utility hookups. Communal restrooms
and shower facilities are integrated with
the camping facilities building where
a guest will be able to also find basic
necessities near the registration office.

While the majority of the active recreation
amenities are geared towards utilizing the
water access, there was a high number
of community votes for additional park
amenities. A skate park, pump track and
small disc golf course was integrated into
the park design to provide additional
amenities for park users. Trailheads are
provided at two locations on the site for
future trail connections. However, there
are also internal nature trails around the
perimeter of the park along with water
front walking paths to provide different
opportunities to reconnect with nature.

Refer to Appendix D for the recommended
landscape planting materials which
focus on a mix of native species, drought
tolerant ornamentals and riparian species.
110
05 IMPLEMENTATION
111
CITY OF OAKLEY 26

5. IMPLEMENTATION
Cost Estimate
To assist with developing a phasing strategy
and allocating funding for improvements,
an estimate of probable costs was prepared
for the preferred plan and broken down
into phases (See diagram below). Phasing
numbering does not indicate the priority for
construction implementation. The phases
were separated in a manner that allowed
items to be built independently of one
another to the maximum extent possible so
that the project could be constructed as
funding became available. Dollar figures
are based on current (2023) construction
costs and are expected to increase over
time due to inflation. When budgeting for
implementation, it is recommended to
add 4% inflation for every year after 2023.

The total estimated cost for each phase is
summarized below. A more detailed cost
breakdown for each phase is provided in
Appendix E.

Funding Sources
Funding for Oakley Regional Park outlined in
this master plan would likely need to come
from a mix of local municipal sources and
external grant funding. Potential funding
sources for elements of the master plan
could include the Boat Launching Facilities
Grant, Recreational Trails Program (RTP)
Non-Motorized, 2023 Urban Agriculture
Grant Program, Proposition 68, local and
private donations, and park dedication fees
from local developments. However, when
grant opportunities arise, they will be easier
to apply for now that desired improvements
are defined and documented.

Phase Estimated Cost
1 $32,809,480
2 $18,969,720
3 $26,809,410
4 $23,752,530
5 $26,321,780
Total Estimated Cost $128,662,920

OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN

PHASING PLAN
SELLERS AVE.

EMERSON SLOUGH
0 40’ 80’ 160’

CONTRA COSTA CANAL
Figure 14 - Phasing Diagram
PHASE 1
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 5
112
06 APPENDIX
113

APPENDIX A
Meeting Summaries
114

www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain
Via Email Only
April 10, 2023
Meeting Summary
Oakley Regional Park Master Plan
RE: Stakeholder Meeting #1
Date: April 10, 2023
Time: 1:30 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.

Attendees: City of Oakley (City): Kevin Rohani
Billilee Saenchalern
Jesse Dela Cruz
Lindsey Bruno

Callander Associates (CA): Zach Katz
Dania Castro

California Department of Water Resources (DWR):

Katherine Bandy
East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD):

Carlos Lare-Masters
David Kendall
Neoma Lavalle
Contra Costa County Water District (CCCWD):

Kim Lin
Dino Angelosante
Reclamation District 2137 (RD): Nate Hersey
The purpose of this meeting was to was to introduce you to the project and solicit input from each stakeholder. The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting
Item Action to take

1. DWR
115
Meeting Summary
Oakley Regional Park Master Plan
RE: Stakeholder Meeting #1
April 10, 2023

222048_SUM_StakeholderMtg#1.docx
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

2. There is a memorandum and CEQA document that
were developed in the early 2000’s. These documents
go into detail about trail access, buffer requirements, shoreline access, lighting and amplifications
requirements. These documents mention that some of
these items will have to be revisited when the park is
under design.

Noted, DWR to send
documents to team.

3. There is a trail access point in the Northern portion of site as shown on the Opportunities & Constraints plan.

This access point connects to the marsh restoration
trail. There no trails access point at the other two
locations shown on the Opp & Con plan.

4. Per the CEQA document, non-motorized such as a
kayak launch would be allowed. Motorized boats is
technically allow but would be difficult with the current sedimentation in Emerson Slough.

5. Fishing is allowed along Emerson Slough within the park property. It is suggested that there are designated
fishing platforms to limit areas where people can fish.

Noted

6. Public fishing access in the marsh restoration area isn’t allowed.

7. All work in and along the slough for fishing platforms and for boat access would require permits from Army
Corps, Fish & Wildlife and State Water Board.

8. There are easements that run through the property. Nate Hershey to send documents indicating
Easements

9. A conceptual trail loop map for the levees and
restoration area was developed.

Nate Hershey to send
document of conceptual
trail.

10. EBRPD

11. Marsh Creek Regional Trail and Big Break Regional Trail are the closest trails and are highly used.

12. There are no new trail connections planned that
would have access to the park.

13. The closest trail to the park that connects to the Marsh Creek Trail is the trail that runs along the housing
development to the south of the canal. The only
116
Meeting Summary
Oakley Regional Park Master Plan
RE: Stakeholder Meeting #1
April 10, 2023

222048_SUM_StakeholderMtg#1.docx
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.
possible connection from this trail to the park would be through Sellers Ave.

Item Action to take

14. The MOU has information that lays out who is
responsible of maintenance along the levee.

15. The Levee could be a trail but access to the levee
would be required.

16. Funding sources are Delta Conservancy and State
Coastal Conservancy.

17. CCCWD

18. CCCWD access the canals through gates on Sellers
Ave. Any changes to Sellers would require these gates
be accessible.

19. The City plans on expanding Sellers to a 4 lane with sidewalk on both sides similar to the southern portion of the street. The sidewalk included in these
improvements could provide a connection from the
park to the trail adjacent to the subdivision to the
south of the canal. CCCWD would want to make sure
any connection is safe for trail users and allows for
access to the existing gates.

City to provide any
documents related to the
Sellers Ave expansion to
CA

20. City would need to coordinate with CCCWD for any
improvements that encroach into the CCCWD
property.

21. The current layout of utility poles should be considered when designing the park.

22. CCCWD has as-builts for Little Dutch Slough and Sellers Ave.

CCCWD to provide asbuilts.

The information above is Callander Associates’ understanding of items discussed and decisions reached at the meeting. Callander Associates is proceeding with the project based on this understanding.

Submitted by:
117
Meeting Summary
Oakley Regional Park Master Plan
RE: Stakeholder Meeting #1
April 10, 2023

222048_SUM_StakeholderMtg#1.docx
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Zach Katz
Callander Associates
cc: All attendees
118
www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain
Via Email Only
April 27, 2023
Meeting Summary
Oakley Regional Park Master Plan
RE: Stakeholder Meeting #2
Date: April 27, 2023
Time: 9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.

Attendees: City of Oakley (City): Kevin Rohani
Billilee Saenchalern
Callander Associates (CA): Zach Katz
Brian Fletcher
City of Oakley Police Department (PD):

Paul Beard
Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (CCCFPD):

Joe Ottolini
Michael Cameron
The purpose of this meeting was to introduce you to the project and solicit input from each stakeholder. The following items were discussed and/or decided upon during the meeting
Item Action to take

1. PD

2. The PD will require proper roadways for ingress and
egress for the site, with the goal of people leaving the site quickly, especially for large events.

Noted

3. The park should try to reduce homelessness with
lighting and visibility into the park.

Noted
119
Meeting Summary
Oakley Regional Park Master Plan
RE: Stakeholder Meeting #2
April 27, 2023

222048_SUM_StakeholderMtg#2.docx
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc.

4. Gated pathways not open to the public could help PD
with monitoring. Cameras throughout the site would
help with monitoring as well.

Noted

5. Although the PD doesn’t have a boat for
emergencies, there should be consideration of a
motorized boat launch for emergencies. Community
members have provided boats for emergencies in the
past.

6. Trails should be wide enough for access vehicles.

Noted
Noted

7. CCCFPD

8. Larger fire trucks wouldn’t be able to access on top of the levee. Only small fire vehicles would be able to.

Noted

9. Water will be required at the site for fire hydrants and possibly sprinklers for buildings.

Noted

10. Any gates should be keyed for fire access.

11. Access roads should support fire trucks and need to meet their turning radii requirements.

CCCFPD to provide turning
radii templates.

12. The City will set up a site visit with PD and CCCFPD to visit the site.

The information above is Callander Associates’ understanding of items discussed and decisions reached at the meeting. Callander Associates is proceeding with the project based on this understanding.

Submitted by:

Zach Katz
Callander Associates
cc: All attendees
120
(This page intentionally left blank)
121

APPENDIX B
Survey Results Summaries
122
www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 14 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565
Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain
April 28, 2023
Community Meeting #1 Data Summary
Oakley Regional Park Master Plan
Most popular Field Sports amenities based on sticker votes

1. Baseball
a. HS/College/Pro, 22 votes
b. Little League, 16 votes
c. Pony, 8 votes
d. Bronco, 0 votes

2. Soccer
a. 11v11, 5 votes
b. U-10, 2 votes
c. Overall, 2 votes
d. U-12, 1 vote
e. U-8, 0 votes
f. U-6, 0 votes

3. Softball, 1 vote

4. Cricket, 1 vote

5. Lacrosse, 1 vote

6. Other Amenities added during the event are classified as ‘Active Recreation’ and was included within that section.

Most popular Active Recreation amenities based on sticker votes

1. Kayak Launch Dock, 34 votes

2. Shoreline, 24 votes

3. Multi-use Trails, 22 votes

4. Pickleball, 12 votes

5. Disc Golf (18 holes), 11 votes

6. Bocce Ball Courts, 6 votes

7. Fitness Court, 6 votes

8. Tennis, 5 votes

9. Other amenities added during the event:
a. Community Pool, 6 votes
b. Riding Arena, 4 votes
c. Dog Park (Small & Large), 3 votes
d. Disc Golf (9 holes), 2 votes
e. Corn Hole, 1 vote
f. Volleyball (Sand or Cement), 1 vote
g. Jet Ski Launch, 1 vote
h. Mini Golf, 1 vote
Most popular Passive Recreation/Play amenities based on sticker votes

1. Nature Play, 19 votes
123
Outreach #1 Data Summary
Oakley Regional Park Master Plan
April 28, 2023

22048_SUM_Outreach1Data.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc.

2. Destination Play Area/Fully Accessible, 18 votes

3. Fishing, 18 votes

4. Community Pavilion, 17 votes

5. Picnic Area, 13 votes

6. Picnic Meadow, 13 votes

7. Shaded Picnic Shelter, 12 votes

8. Standard Play Area, 1 vote

9. Other amenities added during the event:
a. Large fountain area to assemble and create memories, 1 vote b. Facilities for birding/wildlife observation
c. Water feature at play area
Most popular Themes & Programming amenities based on sticker votes

1. Outdoor Classroom, 34 votes

2. Community Garden, 18 votes

3. Agricultural Fields, 8 votes

4. Other amenities added during the event:
a. Living historical Area (farm animals, garden, etc), 1 vote b. History of area/farms/native Americans, 1 vote
Most popular Gilbert House Programming amenities based on sticker votes

1. Wedding Events, 16 votes

2. Corporate Events, 7 votes

3. Other amenities added during the event:
a. 24 Hour Library, 2 votes
b. Welcome/Information Center, 1 vote
Additional Notes Mentioned
• Provide loading/unloading zone near kayak launch for easy access. • Natural turf for sports field is preferred opposed to synthetic turf as it gets too hot. • Provide indoor batting cages, concessions and restrooms. • Provide warming bleachers and shade over bleachers.
• Provide multiple fields to host multiple games/tournaments at once. • 90’ baseball fields can easily be used for smaller fields. • Baseball fields to have portable mounds.
• Provide a space for food truck events.
• Will fencing around fields be temporary or permanent? • Provide field lights.
• Provide storage for all sports. Including storage for Soccer goals. • City lacks tennis courts.
• Keep light pollution and amplification in mind during design phase. • Provide informative panels to learn about restoration area. • Public access to restoration areas.
• Provide space and historical areas for school field trips. • Is there any saved barn wood?
124
Outreach #1 Data Summary
Oakley Regional Park Master Plan
April 28, 2023

22048_SUM_Outreach1Data.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. • Provide a community garden with education on farming. Example parks: Ardenwood historical farm in Fremont, Sunol Ag Park and Tilden park in Berkley. • Provide opportunities within park for fishing tournaments to be held. • Highlight historical significance of the land for education purposes.

Community Meeting #1 Survey Data Summary
Oakley Regional Park Master Plan
Number of Survey Responses
• Public responses = 334
• 90% of survey responders live in the city of Oakley.

Most Popular ‘Likes’ Towards the Previous Master Plan
• Baseball and softball fields
• Walking paths/trails
• Water access/kayak launch
• Playground
• Picnic areas
Preferred Field Sports
• Top three votes: Baseball (280 votes), Soccer (261 votes), and Softball (259 votes) • Lacrosse (51 votes), Cricket (42 votes)
• Additional popular sports that were mentioned within ‘Other’:
o Basketball (26 votes)
o Football (12 votes)
o Tennis(11votes)
o Pickleball (8 votes)
Desired Age Group/Field Size for Baseball and Soccer
• 60’ baseball field/Little League (92 votes)
• 70’ baseball field/Bronco (10 votes)
• 80’ baseball field/Pony (2 votes)
• 90’ baseball field/HS/College/Pro (95 votes)
• U-6 (5 votes)
• U-8 (5 votes)
• U-10 (12 votes)
• U-12 (14 votes)
• 11v11 (9 votes)
• All Ages Soccer fields (14 votes)
Preferred Active Recreation Amenity
• Top Three Votes: Multi-Use Trails (221 votes, Shoreline (189 votes), Kayak Launch Dock (148 votes)
• Bocce Ball Courts (96 votes), Tennis (90 votes), Fitness courts (80 votes), Disc golf (73 votes) & Pickleball (61 votes)
• Additional popular amenities that were mentioned within ‘Other’:
o Basketball (10 votes)
125
Outreach #1 Data Summary
Oakley Regional Park Master Plan
April 28, 2023

22048_SUM_Outreach1Data.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. o Community pool (8 votes)
o Volleyball (3 votes)
o Equestrian area (3 votes)
Preferred Passive Recreation/Play Amenities
• Top three votes: Nature Play (206 votes), Shaded Picnic Shelter (194 votes), Picnic Meadow (146 votes)
• Community pavilion (143 votes), Picnic Area (139 votes), Fishing (132 votes) • Additional popular amenities mentioned within ‘Other’:
o Standard play area: 7
o Destination play area: 9
o Splash pad: 5
o Dog Park: 3
Preferred Play Area Type
• Destination play area/Fully accessible: 282 votes
• Standard play area: 46 votes
Preferred Theme and Programming Amenity
• Top three votes: Outdoor Classroom (265 votes), Community Garden (264 votes), Agricultural Fields (228 votes)
• Gilbert House Event Space (196 votes)
Preferred Park Name
• Top three votes: Oakley Regional Community Park (153 votes), Delta Breeze Regional Park (78 votes), Delta Shoreline Park (72 votes)
126

www.callanderassociates.com

BURLINGAME GOLD RIVER SAN JOSE
1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 285 Burlingame, CA 94010 Gold River, CA 95670 San Jose, CA 95110 650.375.1313 916.985.4366 408.275.0565

Recreate
Educate
Live+Work
Connect
Sustain

August 16, 2023
Community Meeting #2 Survey Data Summary
Oakley Regional Park Master Plan
Number of Attendees who were at Outreach Meeting #1
• 48 out of 162 had attended.

Number of participants who live in Oakley
• 143 out of 162 live in Oakley.

Preferred Alternative
o Alternative 1: 70 votes
o Alternative 2: 72 votes
o Both: 4 votes
o Neutral: 9 votes
Participants Reason for Preferring Alternative 1
• Programming and outdoor classroom
• Disc golf
• Variety of activities/sports for all ages
• Baseball fields
• Soccer fields
• Pickleball courts
• Ability to hold events
• Family oriented
• Amenities for kids
• Trails
• Fishing decks
• Community garden
Participants Reason for Preferring Alternative 2
• Swimming area
• Nature play area
• More nature oriented
• It’s overall uniqueness
• Fishing opportunities
• Has more open space
• The camping
• Family oriented
• Dog park
• Trail space/ nature walks
• Wine Tasting
• Sports fields
127
Outreach #1 Data Summary
Oakley Regional Park Master Plan
April 28, 2023

22048_SUM_Outreach2Data.docx
© copyrighted 2021 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc.

Improvement Recommendations for Alternative 1
• Skate park
• Smaller corp yard
• Add a kayak launch
• Have four baseball field flipped the other direction. • Add swimming area/lagoons.
• Add splash pad.
• More picnic and bbq areas.
• Add dog park.
• Add vineyard and wine tasting.
• Have pickleball courts over tennis courts.
• Have water access similar to alternative 2.
• Have two 90’ ball fields.
• Provide as many additional soccer field sizes as possible. • Include a badminton court.
• Additional restrooms.
• Shaded play structures.
• Indoor sports facilities.
• Fenced play area.
• Add full size basketball court.
• Add livestock arena.

Improvement Recommendations for Alternative 2
• To not have sports dual sports field. To have either soccer or baseball. • Add an observation deck to look out towards the delta. • More shade around play area.
• Add disc golf.
• Remove ball fields for different amenities for camping. • Science camp area.
• Swap motorized boar ramp to human powered craft launch only. • Have paved trails and walkways.
• Provide full hook-up within camp site.
• Additional fishing decks.
• Add fishing pier.
• Add a bike/skate park.
• Add pump track.
• More shade around swimming area.
• Add water theme activities.
• Add a kayak launch.
• Add splash pad.
• Provide a convenience store within campsite.
• More open space.
• Provide regular programming and events.
• Add community garden.
128
(This page intentionally left blank)
129

APPENDIX C
Design Alternatives
130

OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
JULY 19, 2023
MASTER PLAN, ALTERNATIVE 1
0 40’ 80’ 160’
SELLERS AVE.

EMERSON SLOUGH
soccer field, U6, typ.
soccer field, 11v11 &
(2) U10
soccer field, ‘x’ & (2)
U12
baseball field, 90’
baseball field, 60’, typ.
shade structure
drop off zone
entry gateway
picnic & gathering area
multi-use trail, typ.
tennis/pickleball courts
restroom/concession
shaded bleachers, typ.
disc golf (9 holes), typ.
community garden
destination
play area
trail connection
city corp yard
park entry
orchard, typ.
shade structure/
restroom, typ.
shade structure/
outdoor classroom
gilbert house
gilbert house
event space
pedestrian bridge
parking lot, typ.
shoreline trail
restroom building
shaded picnic area &
outdoor classrooom
trailer/ trailhead
parking, typ.
trailhead restroom
trailhead entry
fishing deck,
typ.
overflow parking, typ.
boat launch
outdoor concert
lawn
shade pavilion, typ.
potential future trail
connection
potential future trail
connection
131

OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
JULY 19, 2023

FIELD SPORTS &

ACTIVE RECREATION
ACTIVE
& PASSIVE

RECREATION

THEMES &

PROGRAMING

PASSIVE

RECREATION
DISC GOLF (9-HOLES)

SHADED BLEACHERS
PROGRAM ELEMENTS & MATERIALS, ALTERNATIVE 1

ORCHARD

WEDDINGS AT GILBERT HOUSE

COMMUNITY GARDEN

TRAILHEAD RESTROOM

PICKLEBALL / TENNIS COURTS

OUTDOOR CLASSROOM

SHADED PAVILION / PICNIC AREA

SHORELINE WALKING PATH

MULTI-USE TRAIL
BASEBALL FIELDS, 90’
& 60’
SOCCER FIELDS, 11V11, U12, U10
&
U
6 RESTROOM/CONCESSIONS
NTS
CITY
CORP
YARD

EDUCATIONAL PANELS

EVENTS AT GILBERT HOUSE

FISHING DECKS

BOAT LAUNCH

PICNIC MEADOW

TRAILER PARKING

DESTINATION PLAY

CORP YARD
132

OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
JULY 19, 2023
MASTER PLAN, ALTERNATIVE 2
soccer field, U6, typ.
potential future trail
connection
soccer field, 11v11 &
(2) U10, typ.
baseball field, 90’, typ.
rv camp site, typ.
restroom /
concessions
sports field
entry & plaza
trail connection
shaded bleachers, typ.

SELLERS AVE.

EMERSON SLOUGH
park entry
vineyard, typ.
retail / incubator
space, typ.
(tasting rooms,
resturant, etc.)
gilbert house
gilbert house
event space
parking lot, typ.
trailer/ trailhead
parking, typ.
trailhead restroom
& bait shop
trailhead entry
fishing deck
restroom
building
picnic area/
shade
structure
swimming
area
boat launch
camping facilities &
registration office
nature themed
play area
outdoor stage
shoreline trail
potential future trail
connection
pedestrian bridge
tent camp site, dog park, typ.
typ.
city corp yard
0 40’ 80’ 160’
133

OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
JULY 19, 2023
PROGRAM ELEMENTS & MATERIALS, ALTERNATIVE 2

VINEYARD

WINE TASTING

WEDDINGS/EVENTS AT GILBERT HOUS
E

RETAIL / INCUBATOR SPACE

CORP YARD
NTS

FIELD SPORTS

RECREATION

ACTIVE & PASSIVE

RECREATION

PASSIVE

RECREATION
BASEBALL FIELDS, 90’
S
OCCER FIELDS, 11V11, U12, U10 &
U6

SHADED BLEACHERS

RESTROOM/CONCESSIONS

RV & TENT CAMPING

MULTI-USE TRAIL

CAMPING AMENITIES

SWIMMING AREA

DOG PARK

NATURE PLAY AREA

FISHING DECKS

BOAT LAUNCH

TRAILHEAD RESTROOM

TRAILER PARKING

SHORELINE WALKING PATH

THEMES &

PROGRAMING
CITY
CORP
YARD
134

OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
JULY 19, 2023

LANDSCAPE MATERIALS

VICINITY MAP
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME Trees:

Arbutus marina / Strawberry Madrone
Lagerstroemia indica ‘Tuscarora’ / Red-pink crape myrtle Olea europaea ‘Swan Hill’ / Swan Hill Olive
Platanus acerifolia ‘Columbia’ / London Plan Tree
Quercus agrifolia coast / Live Oak
Zelkova serrata ‘Musashino’ / Saw Leaf Zelkova
Shrubs:

Achillea millefolium ‘Island Pink’ / Yarrow
Bouteloua gracilis ‘Blonde Ambition’ / Blue Grama
Cistus ‘Sunset’ / Rockrose
Cotinus coggygria ‘Royal Purple’ / Purple Smoke Bush
Cotoneaster dammeri ‘Lowfast’ / Bearberry Cotoneaster
Muhlenbergia rigens / Deer Grass
Nepeta x faassenii ‘Walker’s Low’ / Catmint
Perovskia atriplicifolia ‘Blue Spires’ / Russian Sage
Phormium tenax ‘Jack Spratt’ / New Zealand Flax
Rosa x ‘Noaschnee’ / White Carpet Rose
Rosmarinus officinalis ‘Collingwood Ingram’ / Dwarf Rosemary Salvia clevelandii ‘Winnifred Gilman’ / Cleveland Sage
Salvia leucantha ‘Santa Barbara’ / Mexican Bush Sage

GILBERT HOUSE

BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME
Trees:

Acer negundo / Box Elder
Alnus rhombifolia / White Elder
Populus fremontii / Fremont Cottonwood
Quercus lobata / Valley Oak
Shrubs :

Artemisia douglasiana / Mugwort
Cephalanthus occidentalis / Buttonbrush
Deschampsia cespitosa / Tufted Hairgrass
Muhlenbergia rigens / Deer Grass
Rosa californica / California Wild Rose
Salix lasiolepis / Arroyo Willow
RIPARIAN EDGE BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME Trees:

Quercus agrifolia / Coast Live Oak
Quercus lobata / Valley Oak
Shrubs:

Achillea millefolium ‘Island Pink’ / Yarrow
Baccharis pilularis ‘Twin Peaks’ / Dwarf Coyote Brush
Ceanothus gloriosus ‘Anchor Bay’ / Anchor Bay Ceanothus Heteromeles arbutifolia / Toyon
Muhlenbergia rigens / Deer Grass
Nassella pulchra / Purple Needlegrass
Rhamnus californica ‘Mound San Bruno’ / CoffeeBerry
Salvia ‘Bee’s Bliss’ Bee’s / Bliss sage
Salvia clevelandii ‘Winnifred Gilman’ / Cleveland Sage

NATURE EDGE
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME Trees:

Quercus lobata / Valley Oak
Shrubs:

Achillea millefolium ‘Island Pink’ / Yarrow
Deschampsia cespitosa / Tufted Hairgrass
eschscholzia californica / California Poppy
Muhlenbergia rigens / Deer Grass
Nassella pulchra / Purple Needlegrass
Salvia clevelandii ‘Winnifred Gilman’ / Cleveland Sage
Groundcover:
90/10 Tall fescue by Delta Bluegrass

OPEN MEADOW
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME Trees:

Acer rubrum ‘October Glory’ / Red Maple
Arbutus marina Strawberry / Madrone
Lagerstroemia indica ‘Tuscarora’ / Red-Pink Crape Myrtle Magnolia grandiflora ‘Little Gem’ / Dwarf Magnolia
Pistacia chinensis ‘Keith Davey’ / Fruitless Chinese Pistache Ulmus parvifolia ‘True Green’ / Chinese Evergreen Elm
Zelkova serrata ‘Musashino’ / Saw Leaf Zelkova
Shrubs:

Achillea millefolium ‘Island Pink’ / Yarrow
Callistemon viminalis ‘Little John’ / Dwarf Bottlebrush Chondropetalum tectorum / Cape Reed
Cistus ‘Sunset’ / Rockrose
Cotoneaster dammeri ‘Lowfast’ / Bearberry Cotoneaster
Chondopetalum tectorum / Cape Rush
Deschampsia cespitosa / Tufted Hairgrass
Dietes iridioides / Fortnight Lily
Juncus patens / California Rush
Muhlenbergia rigens / Deer Grass
Perovskia atriplicifolia ‘Blue Spires’ / Russian Sage
Salvia leucantha ‘Santa Barbara’ / Mexican Bush Sage
Teucrium fruticans ‘Compactum’ / Bush Germander

PARKING LOT
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME Alternative #1:

Synthetic turf
Alternative #2:
90/10 T a l l f e s c u e b y D e l t a B l u e g r a s s TURF
1 1
3 3
3 5
5 5
2 2
4 4
4 4
6 6
135
(This page intentionally left blank)
136

APPENDIX D
Preferred Master Plan
137

OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
DECEMBER 1, 2023
potential future trail
connection
picnic area/shade
structure
pump track
rv camp site, typ.
picnic area/shade
structure
skate park restroom
flexible open
space/buffer
trail connection
perimeter nature trail,
typ.
disc golf, typ.
park entry
vineyard, typ.
retail / incubator
space, typ.
(tasting rooms,
resturant, restroom, etc.)
gilbert house
gilbert house
event space
parking lot, typ.
trailer/ trailhead
parking, typ.
trailhead restroom
& bait shop
trailhead entry
fishing deck
restroom building
picnic area/
shade structure
flexible event
space
swimming area
boat launch
camping facilities &
registration office
nature destination
play area
outdoor stage
shoreline trail
potential future trail
connection
pedestrian bridge
tent camp site,
typ.
city corp yard
picnic area/
shade structure

PREFERRED MASTER PLAN
SELLERS AVE.

EMERSON SLOUGH
0 40’ 80’ 160’

CONTRA COSTA CANAL
138

OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN

PROGRAM ELEMENTS & MATERIALS

VINEYARD

WINE TASTING

WEDDINGS/EVENTS AT GILBERT HOUS
E

RETAIL / INCUBATOR SPACE

CORP YARD
NTS

ACTIVE RECREATION

ACTIVE & PASSIVE

RECREATION

PASSIVE

RECREATION

RV & TENT CAMPING

MULTI-USE TRAIL

CAMPING AMENITIES

SWIMMING AREA

FISHING DECKS

BOAT LAUNCH

TRAILHEAD RESTROOM

TRAILER PARKING

SHORELINE WALKING PATH

THEMES &

PROGRAMING
CITY
CORP
YARD
DECEMBER 1, 2023
DISC GOLF (6-HOLES)

DESTINATION PLAY

OUTDOOR CLASSROOM

SHADED PAVILION / PICNIC AREA

PICNIC MEADOW

PUMP TRACK

SKATE PARK
139

OAKLEY REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN
DECEMBER 1, 2023

VICINITY MAP

LANDSCAPE PLANTING MATERIAL
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME Trees:

Arbutus marina / Strawberry Madrone
Lagerstroemia indica ‘Tuscarora’ / Red-pink crape myrtle Olea europaea ‘Swan Hill’ / Swan Hill Olive
Platanus acerifolia ‘Columbia’ / London Plan Tree
Quercus agrifolia coast / Live Oak
Zelkova serrata ‘Musashino’ / Saw Leaf Zelkova
Shrubs:

Achillea millefolium ‘Island Pink’ / Yarrow
Bouteloua gracilis ‘Blonde Ambition’ / Blue Grama
Cistus ‘Sunset’ / Rockrose
Cotinus coggygria ‘Royal Purple’ / Purple Smoke Bush
Cotoneaster dammeri ‘Lowfast’ / Bearberry Cotoneaster
Muhlenbergia rigens / Deer Grass
Nepeta x faassenii ‘Walker’s Low’ / Catmint
Perovskia atriplicifolia ‘Blue Spires’ / Russian Sage
Phormium tenax ‘Jack Spratt’ / New Zealand Flax
Rosa x ‘Noaschnee’ / White Carpet Rose
Rosmarinus officinalis ‘Collingwood Ingram’ / Dwarf Rosemary Salvia clevelandii ‘Winnifred Gilman’ / Cleveland Sage
Salvia leucantha ‘Santa Barbara’ / Mexican Bush Sage

GILBERT HOUSE

BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME
Trees:

Acer negundo / Box Elder
Alnus rhombifolia / White Elder
Populus fremontii / Fremont Cottonwood
Quercus lobata / Valley Oak
Shrubs :

Artemisia douglasiana / Mugwort
Cephalanthus occidentalis / Buttonbrush
Deschampsia cespitosa / Tufted Hairgrass
Muhlenbergia rigens / Deer Grass
Rosa californica / California Wild Rose
Salix lasiolepis / Arroyo Willow
RIPARIAN EDGE BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME Trees:

Quercus agrifolia / Coast Live Oak
Quercus lobata / Valley Oak
Shrubs:

Achillea millefolium ‘Island Pink’ / Yarrow
Baccharis pilularis ‘Twin Peaks’ / Dwarf Coyote Brush
Ceanothus gloriosus ‘Anchor Bay’ / Anchor Bay Ceanothus Heteromeles arbutifolia / Toyon
Muhlenbergia rigens / Deer Grass
Nassella pulchra / Purple Needlegrass
Rhamnus californica ‘Mound San Bruno’ / CoffeeBerry
Salvia ‘Bee’s Bliss’ Bee’s / Bliss sage
Salvia clevelandii ‘Winnifred Gilman’ / Cleveland Sage

NATURE EDGE
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME Trees:

Quercus lobata / Valley Oak
Shrubs:

Achillea millefolium ‘Island Pink’ / Yarrow
Deschampsia cespitosa / Tufted Hairgrass
eschscholzia californica / California Poppy
Muhlenbergia rigens / Deer Grass
Nassella pulchra / Purple Needlegrass
Salvia clevelandii ‘Winnifred Gilman’ / Cleveland Sage

OPEN MEADOW
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME Trees:

Acer rubrum ‘October Glory’ / Red Maple
Arbutus marina Strawberry / Madrone
Lagerstroemia indica ‘Tuscarora’ / Red-Pink Crape Myrtle Magnolia grandiflora ‘Little Gem’ / Dwarf Magnolia
Pistacia chinensis ‘Keith Davey’ / Fruitless Chinese Pistache Ulmus parvifolia ‘True Green’ / Chinese Evergreen Elm
Zelkova serrata ‘Musashino’ / Saw Leaf Zelkova
Shrubs:

Achillea millefolium ‘Island Pink’ / Yarrow
Callistemon viminalis ‘Little John’ / Dwarf Bottlebrush Chondropetalum tectorum / Cape Reed
Cistus ‘Sunset’ / Rockrose
Cotoneaster dammeri ‘Lowfast’ / Bearberry Cotoneaster
Chondopetalum tectorum / Cape Rush
Deschampsia cespitosa / Tufted Hairgrass
Dietes iridioides / Fortnight Lily
Juncus patens / California Rush
Muhlenbergia rigens / Deer Grass
Perovskia atriplicifolia ‘Blue Spires’ / Russian Sage
Salvia leucantha ‘Santa Barbara’ / Mexican Bush Sage
Teucrium fruticans ‘Compactum’ / Bush Germander

PARKING LOT

BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME
TURF 90/10 T a l l f e s c u e b y D e l t a B l u e g r a s s 1 1
3 3
3 5
2 2
4 4
4 4
6 6
5 5
5 5
140
(This page intentionally left blank)
141

APPENDIX E
Cost Estimates
142
prepared for the
City of Oakley
prepared on: 11/29/23
prepared by: DC
checked by: ZK/DR
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
A. Project Start-up

1. Bonding and mobilization ALLOW 8.0% 1,345,697.84 $ 1,345,697.84 $

2. Construction staking ALLOW LS 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $

3. Traffic control ALLOW LS 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $
$ 1,645,700.00
B. Demolition

1. Clear and grub 401,075 SF 0.25 $ 100,268.75 $

2. Pavement removal (1' depth) 1,853 CY 80.00 $ 148,240.00 $

3. Slough restoration 80,175 SF 10.00 $ 801,750.00 $

4. Tree removal ALLOW LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $

5. Miscellaneous demolition ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ $ 1,175,260.00
C. Earthwork, Grading & Utilities

1. Rough grading, 1' avg depth 14,854 CY $ 40.00 $ 594,160.00

2. Storm water pollution prevention ALLOW LS $ 52,000.00 $ 52,000.00

3. Water meter POC & backflow preventer ALLOW LS $ 188,000.00 $ 188,000.00

4. Storm drain POC ALLOW LS $ 13,000.00 $ 13,000.00

5. Sanitary sewer POC ALLOW LS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00

6. Stormdrain pipe, allowance ALLOW LS 250,000.00 $ $ 250,000.00

7. Sanitary sewer pipe, allowance ALLOW LS 200,000.00 $ $ 200,000.00

8. Potable water distribution, allowance ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ $ 100,000.00

9. Catch basin, allowance ALLOW LS 50,000.00 $ $ 50,000.00

10. Bioretention area (4% of hardscape) 13,885 SF $ 21.00 $ 291,585.00

11. Outfalls, allowance ALLOW LS 50,000.00 $ $ 50,000.00

12. Electrical Service ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ $ 100,000.00

13. Hydrant, allowance ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ $ 100,000.00

14. Miscellaneous utilities ALLOW LS 250,000.00 $ $ 250,000.00 $ 2,248,750.00
D. Buildings/Shade Structures

1. Corp yard ALLOW LS 1,937,000.00 $ 1,937,000.00 $

2. Shade shelter w/ podium ALLOW LS 125,000.00 $ 125,000.00 $

3. Boat shop/restroom building ALLOW LS 3,270,000.00 $ 3,270,000.00 $ $ 5,332,000.00
E. Site Construction

1. Asphalt paving, roadway/parking 282,990 SF 16.00 $ 4,527,840.00 $

2. Parking lot striping ALLOW LS 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $

3. Concrete pavement 59,390 SF 16.00 $ 950,240.00 $

4. Decorative concrete pavement 4,645 SF 22.00 $ 102,190.00 $

5. Concrete curb and gutter 2,400 LF 65.00 $ 156,000.00 $

6. Boat launch & boarding float ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $

7. Fishing outlook/pier ALLOW LS 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $

8. Park entry sign 1 EA 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $
$ 6,154,270.00
Draft Master Plan - Phase 1
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Oakley Regional Park
22048_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 1 of 15 143
prepared for the
City of Oakley
prepared on: 11/29/23
prepared by: DC
checked by: ZK/DR
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Draft Master Plan - Phase 1
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Oakley Regional Park
F. Site Furnishings

1. Trash receptacle 4 EA 1,415.00 $ 5,660.00 $

2. Recycle receptacle 4 EA 1,430.00 $ 5,720.00 $

3. Picnic table 6 EA 1,720.00 $ 10,320.00 $

4. Bench 2 EA 1,515.00 $ 3,030.00 $

5. Bike rack 2 EA 2,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $

6. Drinking fountain 3 EA 10,500.00 $ 31,500.00 $
$ 60,230.00
G. Site Lighting/Electrical (light poles,
foundation, luminaires & conduit)

1. Roadway lighting, 150' o.c. 36 EA 15,000.00 $ 535,000.00 $

2. Pathway lighting, 75' o.c. 5 EA 10,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ $ 585,000.00
F. Landscape

1. Irrigation POC 3 EA 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $

2. Controller assembly 3 EA 26,000.00 $ 78,000.00 $

3. Irrigation backflow preventer 3 EA 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $

4. Master valve 3 EA 1,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $

5. Flow sensor 3 EA 1,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $

6. Mainline piping (incl. gate valve & quick
coupling)
3,125 LF 30.00 $ 93,750.00 $

7. Irrigation system, shrub and groundcover
areas (including remote control valves)
93,440 SF 4.00 $ 373,760.00 $

8. Irrigation system, tree bubblers 214 EA 100.00 $ 21,400.00 $ $ 602,910.00
G. Soil Preparation

1. Soil preparation and fine grading 93,440 SF 1.00 $ 93,440.00 $ $ 93,440.00
H. Planting

1. Trees, 48" box 27 EA 1,500.00 $ 40,500.00 $

2. Trees, 24" box 60 EA 500.00 $ 30,000.00 $

3. Trees, 15 gal. 20 EA 350.00 $ 7,000.00 $

4. Shrubs and grasses (5' o.c. spacing) 1,495 EA 45.00 $ 67,284.00 $

5. Groundcover (8' o.c. spacing) 897 EA 18.00 $ 16,145.28 $

6. Mulch 93,440 SF 1.00 $ 93,440.00 $
$ 254,370.00
22048_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 2 of 15 144
prepared for the
City of Oakley
prepared on: 11/29/23
prepared by: DC
checked by: ZK/DR
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Draft Master Plan - Phase 1
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Oakley Regional Park
I. Landscape Maintenance

1. Landscape Maintenance 3 MO 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ J. Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 18,166,930.00
K Contingencies

1. Design contingency ALLOW 15% 2,725,039.50 $ 2,725,039.50 $

2. Construction contingencies ALLOW 10% 1,816,693.00 $ 1,816,693.00 $

3. Inflation ALLOW 4% 726,677.20 $ 726,677.20 $
$ 5,268,410.00
L. $ 23,435,340.00
M. Project Soft Costs

1. Construction management Fee (planning,
design, construction & close out)
ALLOW 8% 1,874,827.20 $ 1,874,827.20 $

2. Studies (topo, geotech, traffic,
environmental, etc.)
ALLOW 12% 2,812,240.80 $ 2,812,240.80 $

3. Services (Special inspections & testing) ALLOW 1% 234,353.40 $ 234,353.40 $

4. Permits/Fees (calwater, PG&E, building/plan
review, other)
ALLOW 3% 703,060.20 $ 703,060.20 $

5. Preliminary design and public outreach

6. Design development ALLOW 2.5% 585,883.50 $ 585,883.50 $

7. Construction documents ALLOW 10% 2,343,534.00 $ 2,343,534.00 $

8. Construction administration ALLOW 2.5% 585,883.50 $ 585,883.50 $

9. Miscellaneous ALLOW 1% 234,353.40 $ 234,353.40 $
$ 9,374,140.00
N. $ 32,809,480.00

TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS & CONTINGENCIES
The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on Callander Associates' judgment at this level document preparation and is offered only as reference data. Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. has no control over construction costs and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variation may occure between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices.

Based on drawing titled "Preferred Master Plan", dated "December 1, 2023" TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS - PHASE 1
22048_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 3 of 15 145
prepared for the
City of Oakley
prepared on: 11/29/23
prepared by: DC
checked by: ZK/DR
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
A. Project Start-up

1. Bonding and mobilization ALLOW 8.0% 778,052.55 $ 778,052.55 $

2. Construction staking ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $

3. Traffic control ALLOW LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $

4. Temporary fence 1,915 LF 6.00 $ 11,490.00 $
$ 914,540.00
B. Demolition

1. Clear and grub 305,205 SF 0.25 $ 76,301.25 $

2. Pavement removal (1' depth) 2,210 CY 80.00 $ 176,800.00 $

3. Slough restoration 88,290 SF 10.00 $ 882,900.00 $

4. Miscellaneous demolition ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ $ 1,236,000.00
C. Earthwork, Grading & Utilities

1. Rough grading, 1' avg depth 11,303 CY $ 40.00 $ 452,120.00

2. Beach front grading, 3' avg depth 3,246 CY $ 40.00 $ 129,840.00

3. Storm water pollution prevention ALLOW LS $ 52,000.00 $ 52,000.00

4. Stormdrain pipe, allowance ALLOW LS $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00

5. Sanitary sewer pipe, allowance ALLOW LS $ 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00

6. Potable water distribution, allowance ALLOW LS $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00

7. Catch basin, allowance ALLOW LS $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00

8. Bioretention area (4% of hardscape) 4,635 SF $ 21.00 $ 97,335.00

9. Outfalls, allowance ALLOW LS $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00

10. Electrical Service ALLOW LS $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00

11. Hydrant, allowance ALLOW LS $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00

12. Miscellaneous utilities ALLOW LS $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 1,431,300.00
D. Buildings/Shade Structures

1. Shade shelter, octogonal ALLOW LS 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $

2. Restroom building 1 EA 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $
$ 580,000.00
E. Site Construction

1. Concrete pavement 49,055 SF 16.00 $ 784,880.00 $

1. Decorative concrete pavement 11,410 SF 22.00 $ 251,020.00 $

1. Play area curb 1,205 LF 80.00 $ 96,400.00 $

1. Beach front sand, 1' avg depth 29,220 SF 12.00 $ 350,640.00 $

1. Play area tile surfacing 55,310 SF 27.00 $ 1,493,370.00 $

1. Pedestrian bridge ALLOW LS 800,000.00 $ 800,000.00 $

1. Water front outlook ALLOW LS 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ $ 4,276,310.00
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Oakley Regional Park
Draft Master Plan - Phase 2
22048_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 4 of 15 146
prepared for the
City of Oakley
prepared on: 11/29/23
prepared by: DC
checked by: ZK/DR
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Oakley Regional Park
Draft Master Plan - Phase 2
F. Site Furnishings

1. Play equipment (Tot, Youth & swings) ALLOW LS 500,00 $ 500,000.00 0.00 $

2. Trash receptacle 9 EA 1,415.00 $ 12,735.00 $

3. Recycle receptacle 9 EA 1,430.00 $ 12,870.00 $

4. Picnic table 10 EA 1,720.00 $ 17,200.00 $

5. Bench 16 EA 1,515.00 $ 24,240.00 $

6. Bike rack 5 EA 2,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $

7. Drinking fountain 3 EA 10,500.00 $ 31,500.00 $
$ 608,550.00
G. Site Lighting/Electrical (light poles,
foundation, luminaires & conduit)

1. Pathway lighting, 75' o.c. 17 EA 10,000.00 $ 170,000.00 $ $ 170,000.00
F. Landscape

1. Irrigation POC 2 EA 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $

2. Controller assembly 2 EA 26,000.00 $ 52,000.00 $

3. Irrigation backflow preventer 2 EA 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $

4. Master valve 2 EA 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $

5. Flow sensor 2 EA 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $

6. Mainline piping (incl. gate valve & quick
coupling)
1,700 LF 30.00 $ 51,000.00 $

7. Irrigation system, shrub and groundcover
areas (including remote control valves)
76,825 SF 4.00 $ 307,300.00 $

8. Irrigation system, tree bubblers 170 EA 100.00 $ 17,000.00 $

9. Irrigation system, turf areas (including remote
control valves)
127,465 SF 2.25 $ 286,796.25 $
$ 738,100.00
G. Soil Preparation

1. Soil preparation and fine grading 204,290 SF 1.00 $ 204,290.00 $ $ 204,290.00
H. Planting

1. Trees, 48" box 18 EA 1,500.00 $ 27,000.00 $

2. Trees, 24" box 42 EA 500.00 $ 21,000.00 $

3. Trees, 15 gal. 25 EA 350.00 $ 8,750.00 $

4. Shrubs and grasses (5' o.c. spacing) 1,229 EA 45.00 $ 55,314.00 $

5. Groundcover (8' o.c. spacing) 738 EA 18.00 $ 13,275.36 $

6. Turf from sod 127,465 SF 1.00 $ 127,465.00 $

7. Mulch 76,825 SF 1.00 $ 76,825.00 $
$ 329,630.00
22048_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 5 of 15 147
prepared for the
City of Oakley
prepared on: 11/29/23
prepared by: DC
checked by: ZK/DR
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Oakley Regional Park
Draft Master Plan - Phase 2
I. Landscape Maintenance

1. Landscape Maintenance 3 MO 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ J. Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 10,503,720.00
K Contingencies

1. Design contingency ALLOW 15% 1,575,558.00 $ 1,575,558.00 $

2. Construction contingencies ALLOW 10% 1,050,372.00 $ 1,050,372.00 $

3. Inflation ALLOW 4% 420,148.80 $ 420,148.80 $
$ 3,046,080.00
L. $ 13,549,800.00
M. Project Soft Costs

1. Construction management Fee (planning,
design, construction & close out)
ALLOW 8% 1,083,984.00 $ 1,083,984.00 $

2. Studies (topo, geotech, traffic,
environmental, etc.)
ALLOW 12% 1,625,976.00 $ 1,625,976.00 $

3. Services (Special inspections & testing) ALLOW 1% 13 $ 135,498.00 5,498.00 $

4. Permits/Fees (calwater, PG&E, building/plan
review, other)
ALLOW 3% 406,494.00 $ 406,494.00 $

5. Preliminary design and public outreach

6. Design development ALLOW 2.5% 338,745.00 $ 338,745.00 $

7. Construction documents ALLOW 10% 1,354,980.00 $ 1,354,980.00 $

8. Construction administration ALLOW 2.5% 338,745.00 $ 338,745.00 $

9. Miscellaneous ALLOW 1% 135,498.00 $ 135,498.00 $
$ 5,419,920.00
N. $ 18,969,720.00
The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on Callander Associates' judgment at this level document preparation and is offered only as reference data. Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. has no control over construction costs and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variation may occure between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices.

TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS & CONTINGENCIES
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS - PHASE 2
Based on drawing titled "Preferred Master Plan", dated "December 1, 2023" 22048_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 6 of 15 148
prepared for the
City of Oakley
prepared on: 11/29/23
prepared by: DC
checked by: ZK/DR
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
A. Project Start-up

1. Bonding and mobilization ALLOW 8.0% 1,148,836.63 $ 1,148,836.63 $

2. Construction staking ALLOW LS 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $

3. Traffic control ALLOW LS 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $

4. Temporary fence 3,365 LF 6.00 $ 20,190.00 $
$ 1,344,030.00
B. Demolition

1. Clear and grub 461,345 SF 0.25 $ 115,336.25 $

2. Pavement removal (1' depth) 5,024 CY 80.00 $ 401,920.00 $

3. Miscellaneous demolition ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ $ 617,260.00
C. Earthwork, Grading & Utilities

1. Rough grading, 1' avg depth 17,086 CY $ 40.00 $ 683,440.00

2. Storm water pollution prevention ALLOW LS $ 52,000.00 $ 52,000.00

3. RV sanitary sewer hookups ALLOW LS $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00

4. RV potable water hookups ALLOW LS $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00

5. Stormdrain pipe, allowance ALLOW LS $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00

6. Sanitary sewer pipe, 8", allowance ALLOW LS $ 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00

7. Potable water distribution, allowance ALLOW LS $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00

8. Catch basin, allowance ALLOW LS $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00

9. Bioretention area (4% of hardscape) 9,990 SF $ 21.00 $ 209,790.00

10. Hydrant, allowance ALLOW LS $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00

11. Miscellaneous utilities ALLOW LS $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 1,995,230.00
D. Buildings/Shade Structures

1. Camping facilities/restroom building ALLOW LS $3,705,000.00 3,705,000.00 $

2. Shade shelter, octogonal ALLOW LS 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ $ 3,785,000.00
E. Site Construction

1. Asphalt paving, roadway/parking 124,185 SF 16.00 $ 1,986,960.00 $

2. RV parking lot striping ALLOW LS 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $

3. Asphalt paving, trail 9,050 SF 12.00 $ 108,600.00 $

4. Concrete pavement 59,765 SF 16.00 $ 956,240.00 $

5. Decorative concrete pavement 14,940 SF 22.00 $ 328,680.00 $

6. Concrete curb and gutter 2,435 LF 65.00 $ 158,275.00 $

8. Stabilized decomposed granite pavement 41,720 SF 12. $ 500,640.00 00 $ $ 4,089,400.00
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Oakley Regional Park
Draft Master Plan - Phase 3
22048_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 7 of 15 149
prepared for the
City of Oakley
prepared on: 11/29/23
prepared by: DC
checked by: ZK/DR
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Oakley Regional Park
Draft Master Plan - Phase 3
F. Site Furnishings

1. Trash receptacle 45 EA 1,415.00 $ 63,675.00 $

2. Recycle receptacle 45 EA 1,430.00 $ 64,350.00 $

3. Picnic table 40 EA 1,720.00 $ 68,800.00 $

4. Bench 30 EA 1,515.00 $ 45,450.00 $

5. BBQ grills 18 EA 1,660.00 $ 29,880.00 $

6. Bike rack 6 EA 2,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $

7. Drinking fountain 9 EA 10,500.00 $ 94,500.00 $
$ 378,660.00
G. Site Lighting/Electrical (light poles,
foundation, luminaires & conduit)

1. Roadway lighting, 150' o.c. 21 EA 15,000.00 $ 315,000.00 $

2. Pathway lighting, 75' o.c. 13 EA 10,000.00 $ 130,000.00 $

3. RV parking electrical hookup ALLOW LS 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ $ 595,000.00
F. Landscape

1. Irrigation POC 3 EA 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $

2. Controller assembly 3 EA 26,000.00 $ 78,000.00 $

3. Irrigation backflow preventer 3 EA 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $

4. Master valve 3 EA 1,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $

5. Flow sensor 3 EA 1,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $

6. Mainline piping (incl. gate valve & quick
coupling)
2,785 LF 30.00 $ 83,550.00 $

7. Irrigation system, shrub and groundcover
areas (including remote control valves)
324,630 SF 4.00 $ 1,298,520.00 $

8. Irrigation system, tree bubblers 320 EA 100.00 $ 32,000.00 $

9. Irrigation system, turf areas (including remote
control valves)
21,415 SF 3.00 $ 64,245.00 $
$ 1,592,320.00
G. Soil Preparation

1. Soil preparation and fine grading 346,045 SF 1.00 $ 346,045.00 $ $ 346,050.00
H. Planting

1. Trees, 48" box 40 EA 1,500.00 $ 60,000.00 $

2. Trees, 24" box 90 EA 500.00 $ 45,000.00 $

3. Trees, 15 gal. 30 EA 350.00 $ 10,500.00 $

4. Shrubs and grasses (5' o.c. spacing) 5,194 EA 45.00 $ 233,730.00 $

5. Groundcover (8' o.c. spacing) 3,116 EA 18.00 $ 56,096.64 $

6. Turf from sod 21,415 SF 1.00 $ 21,415.00 $

7. Mulch 324,630 SF 1.00 $ 324,630.00 $
$ 751,370.00
22048_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 8 of 15 150
prepared for the
City of Oakley
prepared on: 11/29/23
prepared by: DC
checked by: ZK/DR
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Oakley Regional Park
Draft Master Plan - Phase 3
I. Landscape Maintenance

1. Landscape Maintenance 3 MO 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ J. Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 15,509,320.00
K Contingencies

1. Design contingency ALLOW 15% 2,326,398.00 $ 2,326,398.00 $

2. Construction contingencies ALLOW 10% 1,550,932.00 $ 1,550,932.00 $

3. Inflation ALLOW 4% 620,372.80 $ 620,372.80 $
$ 4,497,700.00
L. $ 20,007,020.00
M. Project Soft Costs

1. Construction management Fee (planning,
design, construction & close out)
ALLOW 8% 1,600,561.60 $ 1,600,561.60 $

2. Studies (topo, geotech, traffic,
environmental, etc.)
ALLOW 6% 1,200,421.20 $ 1,200,421.20 $

3. Services (Special inspections & testing) ALLOW 1% 20 $ 200,070.20 0,070.20 $

4. Permits/Fees (calwater, PG&E, building/plan
review, other)
ALLOW 3% 600,210.60 $ 600,210.60 $

5. Preliminary design and public outreach

6. Design development ALLOW 2.5% 500,175.50 $ 500,175.50 $

7. Construction documents ALLOW 10% 2,000,702.00 $ 2,000,702.00 $

8. Construction administration ALLOW 2.5% 500,175.50 $ 500,175.50 $

9. Miscellaneous ALLOW 1% 200,070.20 $ 200,070.20 $
$ 6,802,390.00
N. $ 26,809,410.00
The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on Callander Associates' judgment at this level document preparation and is offered only as reference data. Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. has no control over construction costs and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variation may occure between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices.

TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS & CONTINGENCIES
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS - PHASE 3
Based on drawing titled "Preferred Master Plan", dated "December 1, 2023" 22048_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 9 of 15 151
prepared for the
City of Oakley
prepared on: 11/29/23
prepared by: DC
checked by: ZK/DR
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
A. Project Start-up

1. Bonding and mobilization ALLOW 8.0% 1,017,844.99 $ 1,017,844.99 $

2. Construction staking ALLOW LS 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $

3. Traffic control ALLOW LS 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $

5. Temporary fence 2,870 LF 6.00 $ 17,220.00 $
$ 1,285,060.00
B. Demolition

1. Clear and grub 395,745 SF 0.25 $ 98,936.25 $

2. Pavement removal (1' depth) 4,616 CY 80.00 $ 369,280.00 $

3. Miscellaneous demolition ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ $ 568,220.00
C. Earthwork, Grading & Utilities

1. Rough grading, 1' avg depth 14,657 CY $ 40.00 $ 586,280.00

2. Pump track grading ALLOW LS 250,000.00 $ $ 250,000.00

3. Storm water pollution prevention ALLOW LS $ 52,000.00 $ 52,000.00

4. Stormdrain pipe, allowance ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ $ 100,000.00

5. Sanitary sewer pipe, 8", allowance ALLOW LS 150,000. $ $ 150,000.00 00

6. Potable water distribution, allowance ALLOW LS 100,0 $ $ 100,000.00 00.00

7. Catch basin, allowance ALLOW LS 50,000.00 $ $ 50,000.00

8. Bioretention area (4% of hardscape) 14,660 SF $ 21.00 $ 307,860.00

9. Electrical Service ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ $ 100,000.00

10. Hydrant, allowance ALLOW LS 50,000.00 $ $ 50,000.00

11. Miscellaneous utilities ALLOW LS 150,000.00 $ $ 150,000.00 $ 1,896,140.00
D. Buildings/Shade Structures

1. Shade shelter, Square 2 EA 80,000.00 $ 160,000.00 $

2. Restroom building 1 EA 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $
$ 660,000.00
E. Site Construction

1. Asphalt paving, trail 290,620 SF 12.00 $ 3,487,440.00 $

2. Concrete pavement 60,715 SF 16.00 $ 971,440.00 $

3. Decorative concrete pavement 15,180 SF 22.00 $ 333,960.00 $

4. Skate Park ALLOW LS 1,000,000.00 $ 1,000,000.00 $

5. Pump track ALLOW LS 700,000.00 $ 700,000.00 $

6. Disc golf (6 holes) ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ $ 6,592,840.00
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Oakley Regional Park
Draft Master Plan - Phase 4
22048_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 10 of 15 152
prepared for the
City of Oakley
prepared on: 11/29/23
prepared by: DC
checked by: ZK/DR
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Oakley Regional Park
Draft Master Plan - Phase 4
F. Site Furnishings

1. Trash receptacle 9 EA 1,415.00 $ 12,735.00 $

2. Recycle receptacle 9 EA 1,430.00 $ 12,870.00 $

3. Picnic table 10 EA 1,720.00 $ 17,200.00 $

4. Bench 20 EA 1,515.00 $ 30,300.00 $

5. Bike rack 8 EA 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $

6. Drinking fountain 2 EA 10,500.00 $ 21,000.00 $

7. Skate park features ALLOW LS 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ $ 310,110.00
G. Site Lighting/Electrical (light poles,
foundation, luminaires & conduit)

1. Pathway lighting, 75' o.c. 11 EA 10,000.00 $ 110,000.00 $ $ 110,000.00
F. Landscape

1. Irrigation POC 3 EA 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $

2. Controller assembly 3 EA 26,000.00 $ 78,000.00 $

3. Irrigation backflow preventer 3 EA 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $

4. Master valve 3 EA 1,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $

5. Flow sensor 3 EA 1,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $

6. Mainline piping (incl. gate valve & quick
coupling)
1,715 LF 30.00 $ 51,450.00 $

7. Irrigation system, shrub and groundcover
areas (including remote control valves)
296,990 SF 4.00 $ 1,187,960.00 $

8. Irrigation system, tree bubblers 210 EA 100.00 $ 21,000.00 $ $ 1,374,410.00
G. Soil Preparation

1. Soil preparation and fine grading 296,990 SF 1.00 $ 296,990.00 $ $ 296,990.00
H. Planting

1. Trees, 48" box 22 EA 1,500.00 $ 33,000.00 $

2. Trees, 24" box 53 EA 500.00 $ 26,500.00 $

3. Trees, 15 gal. 30 EA 350.00 $ 10,500.00 $

4. Shrubs and grasses (5' o.c. spacing) 4,752 EA 45.00 $ 213,831.00 $

5. Groundcover (8' o.c. spacing) 2,851 EA 18.00 $ 51,320.16 $

6. Mulch 296,990 SF 1.00 $ 296,990.00 $
$ 632,140.00
22048_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 11 of 15 153
prepared for the
City of Oakley
prepared on: 11/29/23
prepared by: DC
checked by: ZK/DR
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Oakley Regional Park
Draft Master Plan - Phase 4
I. Landscape Maintenance

1. Landscape Maintenance 3 MO 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ J. Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 13,740,910.00
K Contingencies

1. Design contingency ALLOW 15% 2,061,136.50 $ 2,061,136.50 $

2. Construction contingencies ALLOW 10% 1,374,091.00 $ 1,374,091.00 $

3. Inflation ALLOW 4% 549,636.40 $ 549,636.40 $
$ 3,984,860.00
L. $ 17,725,770.00
M. Project Soft Costs

1. Construction management Fee (planning,
design, construction & close out)
ALLOW 8% 1,418,061.60 $ 1,418,061.60 $

2. Studies (topo, geotech, traffic,
environmental, etc.)
ALLOW 6% 1,063,546.20 $ 1,063,546.20 $

3. Services (Special inspections & testing) ALLOW 1% 17 $ 177,257.70 7,257.70 $

4. Permits/Fees (calwater, PG&E, building/plan
review, other)
ALLOW 3% 531,773.10 $ 531,773.10 $

5. Preliminary design and public outreach

6. Design development ALLOW 2.5% 443,144.25 $ 443,144.25 $

7. Construction documents ALLOW 10% 1,772,577.00 $ 1,772,577.00 $

8. Construction administration ALLOW 2.5% 443,144.25 $ 443,144.25 $

9. Miscellaneous ALLOW 1% 177,257.70 $ 177,257.70 $
$ 6,026,760.00
N. $ 23,752,530.00
The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on Callander Associates' judgment at this level document preparation and is offered only as reference data. Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. has no control over construction costs and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variation may occure between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices.

TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS & CONTINGENCIES
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS - PHASE 4
Based on drawing titled "Preferred Master Plan", dated "December 1, 2023" 22048_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 12 of 15 154
prepared for the
City of Oakley
prepared on: 11/29/23
prepared by: DC
checked by: ZK/DR
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
A. Project Start-up

1. Bonding and mobilization ALLOW 8.0% 1,079,602.05 $ 1,079,602.05 $

2. Construction staking ALLOW LS 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $

3. Traffic control ALLOW LS 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $

4. Temporary fence 1,345 LF 6.00 $ 8,070.00 $
$ 1,287,670.00
B. Demolition

1. Clear and grub 436,685 SF 0.25 $ 109,171.25 $

2. Pavement removal (1' depth) 2,245 CY 80.00 $ 179,600.00 $

3. Metal barn removal ALLOW LS 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $

4. Tree removal ALLOW LS 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $

5. Miscellaneous demolition ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ $ 513,770.00
C. Earthwork, Grading & Utilities

1. Rough grading, 1' avg depth 18,418 CY $ 40.00 $ 736,720.00

2. Storm water pollution prevention ALLOW LS $ 52,000.00 52,000.00 $

3. Water meter POC & backflow preventer ALLOW LS $ 94,000.00 94,000.00 $

4. Storm drain POC ALLOW LS $ 13,000.00 13,000.00 $

5. Sanitary sewer POC ALLOW LS $ 10,000.00 10,000.00 $

6. Gas POC ALLOW LS $ 10,000.00 10,000.00 $

7. Gas pipe, allowance ALLOW LS 120,000.00 $ 120,000.00 $

8. Stormdrain pipe, allowance ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $

9. Sanitary sewer pipe, 8", allowance ALLOW LS 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $

10. Potable water distribution, allowance ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $

11. Catch basin, allowance ALLOW LS 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $

12. Bioretention area (4% of hardscape) 6,025 SF $ 21.00 126,525.00 $

13. Outfalls, allowance ALLOW LS 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $

14. Electrical Service ALLOW LS 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $

15. Hydrant, allowance ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $

16. Miscellaneous utilities ALLOW LS 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ $ 2,162,250.00
D. Buildings/Shade Structures

1. Gilbert house renovation ALLOW LS 800,000.00 $ 800,000.00 $

2. retail/incubator/restroom building 2 EA 3,135,000.00 $ 6,270,000.00 $ $ 7,070,000.00
E. Site Construction

1. Asphalt paving, roadway/parking 74,185 SF 16.00 $ 1,186,960.00 $

2. Parking lot striping ALLOW LS 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $

3. Concrete pavement 54,605 SF 16.00 $ 873,680.00 $

4. Decorative concrete pavement 15,275 SF 22.00 $ 336,050.00 $

5. Concrete curb and gutter 1,010 LF 65.00 $ 65,650.00 $

6. Stabilized decomposed granite pavement 6,510 SF 12.00 $ 78,120.00 $ $ 2,570,460.00
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Oakley Regional Park
Draft Master Plan - Phase 5
22048_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 13 of 15 155
prepared for the
City of Oakley
prepared on: 11/29/23
prepared by: DC
checked by: ZK/DR
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Oakley Regional Park
Draft Master Plan - Phase 5
F. Site Furnishings

1. Trash receptacle 8 EA 1,415.00 $ 11,320.00 $

2. Recycle receptacle 8 EA 1,430.00 $ 11,440.00 $

3. Bench 10 EA 1,515.00 $ 15,150.00 $

4. Bike rack 2 EA 2,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $

5. Drinking fountain 3 EA 10,500.00 $ 31,500.00 $
$ 73,410.00
G. Site Lighting/Electrical (light poles,
foundation, luminaires & conduit)

1. Roadway lighting, 150' o.c. 15 EA 15,000.00 $ 220,000.00 $

2. Pathway lighting, 75' o.c. 20 EA 10,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ $ 420,000.00
F. Landscape

1. Irrigation POC 2 EA 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $

2. Controller assembly 2 EA 26,000.00 $ 26,000.00 $

3. Irrigation backflow preventer 2 EA 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $

4. Master valve 2 EA 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $

5. Flow sensor 2 EA 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $

6. Mainline piping (incl. gate valve & quick
coupling)
1,345 LF 30.00 $ 40,350.00 $

7. Irrigation system, shrub and groundcover
areas (including remote control valves)
34,615 SF 4.00 $ 4.00 $

8. Irrigation system, tree bubblers 160 EA 100.00 $ 16,000.00 $

9. Irrigation system, turf areas (including remote
control valves)
21,115 SF 3.00 $ 63,345.00 $
$ 164,700.00
G. Soil Preparation

1. Soil preparation and fine grading 55,730 SF 1.00 $ 55,730.00 $ $ 55,730.00
H. Planting

1. Trees, 48" box 18 EA 1,500.00 $ 27,000.00 $

2. Trees, 24" box 42 EA 500.00 $ 21,000.00 $

3. Trees, 15 gal. 20 EA 350.00 $ 7,000.00 $

4. Vineyard ALLOW LS 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $

5. Shrubs and grasses (5' o.c. spacing) 554 EA 45.00 $ 24,930.00 $

6. Groundcover (8' o.c. spacing) 332 EA 18.00 $ 5,980.32 $

7. Turf from sod 21,115 SF 1.00 $ 21,115.00 $

8. Mulch 34,615 SF 1.00 $ 34,615.00 $
$ 241,640.00
22048_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 14 of 15 156
prepared for the
City of Oakley
prepared on: 11/29/23
prepared by: DC
checked by: ZK/DR
Item # Description Qty Unit Cost Item Total Subtotal
Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
Oakley Regional Park
Draft Master Plan - Phase 5
I. Landscape Maintenance

1. Landscape Maintenance 3 MO 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ J. Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 14,574,630.00
K Contingencies

1. Design contingency ALLOW 15% 2,186,194.50 $ 2,186,194.50 $

2. Construction contingencies ALLOW 10% 1,457,463.00 $ 1,457,463.00 $

3. Inflation ALLOW 4% 582,985.20 $ 582,985.20 $
$ 4,226,640.00
L. $ 18,801,270.00
M. Project Soft Costs

1. Construction management Fee (planning,
design, construction & close out)
ALLOW 8% 1,504,101.60 $ 1,504,101.60 $

2. Studies (topo, geotech, traffic,
environmental, etc.)
ALLOW 12% 2,256,152.40 $ 2,256,152.40 $

3. Services (Special inspections & testing) ALLOW 1% 188,012.70 $ 188,012.70 $

4. Permits/Fees (calwater, PG&E, building/plan
review, other)
ALLOW 3% 564,038.10 $ 564,038.10 $

5. Preliminary design and public outreach

6. Design development ALLOW 2.5% 470,031.75 $ 470,031.75 $

7. Construction documents ALLOW 10% 1,880,127.00 $ 1,880,127.00 $

8. Construction administration ALLOW 2.5% 470,031.75 $ 470,031.75 $

9. Miscellaneous ALLOW 1% 188,012.70 $ 188,012.70 $
$ 7,520,510.00
N. $ 26,321,780.00
The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on Callander Associates' judgment at this level document preparation and is offered only as reference data. Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. has no control over construction costs and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variation may occure between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices.

TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS & CONTINGENCIES
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS - PHASE 5
Based on drawing titled "Preferred Master Plan", dated "December 1, 2023" 22048_EST.xls
© copyrighted 2023 Callander Associates
Landscape Architecture, Inc. 15 of 15 157
(This page intentionally left blank)
158

STAFF REPORT

City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: May 14, 2024
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Adopting Two Resolutions Initiating the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 proceedings; initiating the process and declaring the intention to levy and collect assessments, and setting June 11, 2024, as the date for the Public Hearing
Background and Analysis
On July 10, 2000, the City Council approved a resolution ordering the formation of the City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 (District) to fund the maintenance and operation of public parks, landscaping, and streetlighting. Prior to that, operations and maintenance funds were provided through the Countywide Landscaping and Lighting District (LL-2) and County Service Area L-100 (CSA L-100). In accordance with the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (Streets and Highways Code Section 22500 et seq.), the City is required to annually prepare an Engineer’s Report that proposes a budget for the assessment district as well as assessments for all properties within the District.

To begin the process of developing the annual Engineer's Report, Section 22622 of the Streets and Highways Code requires the City Council to first adopt a resolution generally describing any proposed new improvements to be included in determining the annual assessment levied for any assessment district created under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, declaring the intention to annex territory, and must order the preparation of an Engineer's Report prior to initiating proceedings to fix the annual levy of assessments for any such districts. That resolution is included with this report.

The District includes three zones, two of which are Citywide. Zone 1, commonly known as the Citywide Parks Zone, provides for the operation and maintenance of community parks, landscaping and recreational facilities. Zone 2, commonly known as the Citywide Street Lighting Zone, provides for the operation and maintenance of streetlights within the public rights-of-ways throughout Oakley. Zone 3 contains 26 sub-zones and provides for the operation and maintenance of landscaping and neighborhood parks for specific projects or neighborhoods.

The City Engineer, utilizing the services of Francisco & Associates, Inc. has prepared the Preliminary Engineer’s Report for the District, for Fiscal Year 2024/25. The Engineer’s Report, which is on file with the City Clerk, proposes a budget and assessments for each of the three zones, and explains the methodology used to determine the proposed assessment.

Approved and
Forwarded to the
City Council
159

STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 2
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US There are no proposed assessment rate increases in the District for Fiscal Year 2024/25 above the allowed maximum assessment rates.

While the purpose of the Engineer’s Report is to establish the assessment rates to be levied for the year, Staff uses the document to review the overall financial health of the District and the individual zones. It is important to note that the budgets are based on the best current information and City staff projections for the budget year.

Zone 1 has had several projects come online in recent years including the Marsh Creek restoration project, the Main Street medians and parking lots in the downtown area that are being expanded as part of the road improvement project, the addition of new landscaping located at the Highway Off Ramp/Main Street at Neroly Road intersection, and improvements to the Moura property.

Zone 2 continues to rely on a contribution from Gas Tax to fund the PG&E utility charges.

Assessments are expected to be up slightly from what was budgeted last year, but a Gas Tax contribution of approximately $190,000 for FY 2024/25 is expected, based on FY 2023/24 costs. There are avenues Staff are pursuing to offset the Gas Tax contribution. First, all new development in the City is annexing into the City’s Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 in lieu of the LLAD and in-tract streetlighting for these new developments is funded by the CFD.

Also, CFD No. 2015-2 is apportioned a share of cost associated with streetlights located along arterials and major roadways. Furthermore, the installation of new LED lamps is expected to lower energy costs in the future.

Zone 3 consists of 26 sub-zones, each of which has its own individual City fund and corresponding budget table. Each sub-zone’s projected revenues roughly equal or exceed its annual expenditures. Careful review of the individual sub-zone budgets will reveal that some total expenditures are slightly higher than the revenues; in practicality Staff will be managing actual costs throughout the year to try and not spend more funds than are being generated annually, unless absolutely necessary. Some of the older zones need to be managed very closely to ensure adequate funds are available, but that is no different than years past.

The Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that a public hearing be held by the City Council to determine if the proposed assessments should be levied. Adoption of the resolution will set the hearing for the regular City Council meeting on June 11, 2024, and the hearing will be advertised in the newspaper at least 10 days prior.

Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
This item is consistent with the Strategic Plan 27+ Park and Open Space and Finance and Fiscal Responsibility section goals.
160

STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 3
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US Fiscal Impact
For Fiscal Year 2024/25, it is estimated that the City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 will provide the following revenue:

Zone 1 (Community Parks) - $1,492,757
Zone 2 (Citywide Streetlighting) - $259,376
Zone 3 (Project Specific Landscaping) - $ 3,265,860
Total $ 5,017,993
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution of Initiation and Resolution of Intention to levy and collect assessments and setting June 11, 2024, as the date for the Public Hearing for the City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1.

Attachments

1. Resolution of Initiation

2. Resolution declaring the intention to levy and collect assessments, and setting the Public Hearing

3. Preliminary Engineer’s Report
161

CITY OF OAKLEY
RESOLUTION NO. ___-24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY INITIATING THE

ANNUAL PROCESS FOR THE OAKLEY STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 AND ORDERING THE ENGINEER OF WORK TO PREPARE AND FILE THE ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25
WHEREAS, on July 10, 2000, the City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 (the "District") was formed by the adoption of Resolution 67-00; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the July 10, 2000, formation of the District, various new subdivisions have been annexed into the District in accordance with the requirements of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 and Proposition 218; and WHEREAS, Section 22622 of the Streets and Highways Code requires the City Council to adopt a resolution generally describing any proposed new improvements to be included in determining the annual assessment levied for any assessment district created under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, Section 22622 further requires that the City order the preparation of an Engineer's Report prior to initiating proceedings to fix the annual levy of assessments for any such districts.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Oakley hereby finds and directs as follows:

1. The improvements to be made in the City of Oakley Landscape and Lighting District No. 1 ("District") for Fiscal Year 2024/25 are generally described as follows:

Zone 1: The maintenance, operation, and repair of public landscaping, park and recreational facilities located within the public right-of-ways, public property, and designated easements within Zone 1 of the District. The facilities shall include, but not be limited to, landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, sidewalks, trails, lights, playground equipment, play courts, public restrooms, and associated appurtenances.

Zone 2: The maintenance, operation, repair and replacement of all public streetlighting facilities located within the public streets and within public easements for private streets within Zone 2 of the District. The facilities shall include, but not be limited to, the lighting poles, fixtures, conduits, conductors, service boxes, controllers, and appurtenances, and the furnishing of power, together with all 162
incidental expenses for the maintenance, operation, and repair of the streetlighting system.

Zone 3: The maintenance, operation, repair and replacement of all public landscaping located within the public streets, public parks, and within public easements within the sub-zones of Zone 3 of the District. The facilities shall include, but not be limited to landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, sidewalks, trails, and appurtenances, and the furnishing of power and water, together with all incidental expenses for the maintenance, operation, and repair of the landscaping.

2. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 22622, Francisco & Associates is hereby directed to prepare the annual Engineer's Report prior to initiating proceedings to fix the annual levy of assessments for the District.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oakley at a meeting held on the 14th of May 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTIONS:

APPROVED:

_______________________
Anissa Williams, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________ _______________________
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
163

CITY OF OAKLEY
RESOLUTION NO. ___-24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER’S REPORT, DECLARING THE INTENT TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25, AND SETTING JUNE 11, 2024, AS THE DATE FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE CITY OF OAKLEY STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, on July 10, 2000, the City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 (the “District”) was formed by the adoption of Resolution 67- 00; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the July 10, 2000, formation of the District, various new subdivisions have been annexed into the District in accordance with the requirements of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 and Proposition 218; and WHEREAS, as required by Section 22622 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the City Council of the City of Oakley, by approval of Resolution of Initiation No. ___-24 has described any proposed improvements to be included for the determination of annual assessments levied for any assessment district created under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; ordered the preparation of an Engineer’s Report to determine the annual levy of assessments for any such district; and proposed annexation of territory, concurrently with and through the same procedures as the formation of new Assessment Districts; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer of Work has prepared a report in accordance with the provisions of Article XIIID, Section 4, of the California Constitution, provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, and Section 22623 of the California Streets and Highways Code. Said report has been made, filed, and duly considered by this City Council and is hereby deemed sufficient and preliminarily approved. Said report shall stand as the report for all subsequent proceedings relating to the proposed levy of District assessments for Fiscal Year 2024/25; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council to order the levy and collection of assessments within the District for Fiscal Year 2024/25; and WHEREAS, reference is hereby made to the aforementioned report on file with the City Clerk for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots within said district; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing will be held on the levy of the proposed assessments before the City Council on June 11, 2024, at 6:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Oakley City Hall at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California, 94561. Prior to the conclusion of said 164
public hearing, any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk, or having previously filed a protest, may file a withdrawal of that protest. A written protest by a property owner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by such owner; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk is authorized and directed to give the notice of hearing required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Government Code Section 54954.6(c).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Oakley hereby finds and directs as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. Fiscal Year 2024-25 Preliminary Engineer’s Report for the City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 is hereby approved.

3. The public hearing on the levy of the proposed assessments will be held before the City Council on June 11, 2024, at 6:30 P.M. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Council Chambers located at the Oakley City Hall, 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California, 94561.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oakley at a meeting held on the 14th of May 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTIONS:

APPROVED:

_______________________
Anissa Williams, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________ _______________________
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
165
Street LighƟng and Landscape
Assessment District No. 1
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Preliminary Engineer’s Report
May 14, 2024
166
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.

City of Oakley City Council Members and Staff ............................................................ ii Certificates .................................................................................................................. iii SECTION I – Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 SECTION II – Annexation of Territory ......................................................................... 4 SECTION III – Engineer’s Report ................................................................................ 6 Part A – Plans and Specifications ..................................................................... 8 Part B – Estimate of Cost ................................................................................. 16 Table No. 1 – FY 2024-25 Budget Summary ...................................... 16 Part C – Assessment District Diagram ............................................................. 17 Part D – Method of Apportionment of Assessment ........................................... 21 General vs. Special Benefit ................................................................ 22 Part E – Property Owner List & Assessment Roll ............................................. 40

APPENDICES
Appendix A – Benefit Zone 1 (Community Parks, Landscaping & Recreation) – Detailed Maintenance Diagrams
Appendix B – Benefit Zone 3 (Interior Landscaping/Neighborhood Parks) – Detailed Maintenance Diagrams
Appendix C – Detailed Cost Estimate of the Improvements for each Benefit Zone Appendix D – Benefit Zone 2 Streetlighting EDUs by Land Use Classification Appendix E – Assessment Roll
167
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 AGENCY DIRECTORY ii

CITY OF OAKLEY
STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

CITY OF OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND STAFF
Anissa Williams
Mayor
Shannon Shaw
Vice Mayor
George Fuller
Council Member
Hugh Henderson
Council Member
Aaron Meadows
Council Member
Joshua McMurray
City Manager
Derek P. Cole
City Attorney
Jeri Tejada
Administrative Services Director
Kevin Rohani, P.E.

Public Works Director/City Engineer

Francisco & Associates
Assessment Engineer
168
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 CERTIFICATES iii
ENGINEER’S REPORT

CITY OF OAKLEY
STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
The undersigned, acting on behalf of the City of Oakley, respectfully submits the enclosed Engineer’s Report as directed by the Oakley City Council pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution, provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and Section 22500 et seq of the California Streets and Highways Code. The undersigned certifies that he is a Professional Engineer, registered in the State of California.

Dated: April 26, 2024 By:

Kevin Rohani
City Engineer
RCE No. 51138
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram, thereto attached, was filed with me on the day of , 2024.

Libby Vreonis
City Clerk
City of Oakley, California
By:

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of City of Oakley, California, on the day of , 2024.

Libby Vreonis
City Clerk
City of Oakley, California
By:

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram, thereto attached, was filed with the Contra Costa County Auditor, on the day of , 2024.

Libby Vreonis
City Clerk
City of Oakley, California
By:
169
City of Oakley SECTION I
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 INTRODUCTION 1 SECTION I

INTRODUCTION

ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF OAKLEY
STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
In 1999 the City of Oakley was incorporated. Certain areas within the City limits of Oakley were previously located within and benefited from the Contra Costa Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) and the Street Lighting Assessment District (L-100). Through the formation of the Street Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District No. 1 (“District”) in Fiscal Year (FY) 2000-01, the City of Oakley transferred the responsibility of the park and recreational, streetlighting and landscaping improvements from the County to the City.

As required by the 1972 Act, the City sent notices to each property owner informing them of the formation of the District and allowed them the opportunity to attend a Public Meeting and a Public Hearing held June 26, 2000 and July 10, 2000, respectively. At the Public Hearing, written protests representing more than 50% of the parcels being assessed were not received and, accordingly, the City Council was permitted to form the assessment district. City Council subsequently adopted a resolution confirming the levy of assessments. Following the adoption of this resolution, the Assessor’s Roll was prepared and filed with the County Auditor’s Office to be included on the FY 2000-01 tax roll.

Background Information for Zone 1 (Community Parks, Landscaping & Recreation) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, through the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, approved the formation of the Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2).

Improvements that were authorized to be constructed, operated, maintained, and serviced included:

Landscaping, irrigation, landscape and recreational lighting, park and recreational facilities, including but not limited to playground equipment, play courts, public restrooms, and associated appurtenant facilities.

Generally, the public improvements were constructed by developers as a part of the conditions permitting the developer to construct new housing or commercial/industrial developments. However, the ongoing operation and maintenance of the various improvements were financed through the LL-2. The LL-2 is composed of benefit zones to ensure that the operation and maintenance costs of the landscaping and park and recreational improvements are specifically paid for by those property owners who directly benefit from the improvements.

The Oakley Municipal Advisory Council’s Parks Subcommittee recognized the need to develop attractive parks, well-maintained landscaped areas and recreation facilities and 170
City of Oakley SECTION I
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 INTRODUCTION 2 wanted to provide a funding source that would satisfy those needs. On September 22, 1987, the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County adopted Resolution No. 87-566 for the annexation of the Oakley area to the Countywide Landscaping District, forming Zone 16. When the City of Oakley incorporated in 1999, Zone 16 of LL-2 became Zone 1 of the Oakley Street Lighting & Landscape Assessment District. The original assessment per single family residence was $29.80 which was set in FY 1987-88. The assessment rate was subsequently increased to $31.88 per single-family parcel and has remained at this rate since FY 1995-96. The Zone 1 assessment rate was not intended to be increased until such time that the annual costs to maintain the facilities exceeded the annual revenue generated through the levy of assessments.

In Fiscal Year 2003-04, City Staff analyzed the Zone 1 assessment rate to determine if the revenues would be sufficient to meet the newly adopted goals of the City’s Parks & Recreation Master Plan 2021 which stipulates a goal of 6.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. The analysis of the Zone 1 rate concluded that the City would need to charge future (new) development $211.33 (in FY 2004-05 dollars) per single family home to ensure that a stable revenue source would be available for the newly adopted goal of 6.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. On May 27, 2003, City Staff presented this analysis to Council and Council concurred that the assessment rate for all future (new) development would be $211.33 per single family home resulting in the creation of Zone 1-A. Commencing with FY 2004-05, the maximum assessment rate for Zone 1-A has been increased annually based upon the change in the Consumer Price Index for the Bay Area.

In FY 2005-06, Contra Costa County created Zone 1-B to provide a stable funding source for the Summer Lake Community Park as part of the Summer Lake Development and other community facilities. The City subsequently annexed this territory into the City of Oakley in 2006.

Background Information for Zone 2 (Streetlighting)
The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, on October 31, 1978, instructed the Public Works Director to develop an alternate means to supplement the ad-valorem tax revenue to fund streetlighting in various County Service Areas. As provided in the County Service Area Law, Government Code, Sections 25210.1 and following, the Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 79-42 on March 27, 1979 confirming the formation of a Street Lighting Assessment District (L-100) to fund the operation and maintenance of streetlights. Improvements that are authorized to be constructed, operated, maintained and serviced include:

Poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, wiring equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices and associated appurtenant facilities.

The areas of the County streetlighting district that were subsequently annexed into the City of Oakley in 2000 are now a part of the City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape 171
City of Oakley SECTION I
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Assessment District No. 1. This portion of the streetlighting assessment is identified as Zone 2 of the Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1.

In Fiscal Year 2005-06, City Staff analyzed the Zone 2 assessment rate to ensure that revenues would be sufficient to meet the rising energy costs. The analysis of Zone 2 concluded that the City would need to charge new development $42.81 (in FY 2005-06 dollars) per single family home to ensure that a stable revenue source for rising energy costs would be created. Commencing with FY 2006-07, the maximum assessment rate for Zone 2-A has been increased annually based upon the change in the Consumer Price Index for the Bay Area.

Background Information for Zone 3 (Interior Landscaping/Neighborhood Parks) In addition to Zone 16 of LL-2, many of the subdivisions within LL-2 included public landscaping improvements which had individual Zones for the operation and maintenance of the interior landscaping. When the City of Oakley incorporated in 1999, these existing landscaping Zones were transferred to the Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 as subzones of Zone 3. The facilities that are operated and maintained within these subzones are described in further detail in Section III, Part A of this report. As new properties are developed, they are required to annex into an existing subzone or form a new subzone to operate and maintain the facilities.

Current Information
As required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, this annual Engineer’s Report includes: (1) a description by benefit zone of the improvements to be operated, maintained and serviced by the District, (2) an estimated budget by benefit zone for the District, and (3) a listing of the proposed assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District.

The Oakley City Council will hold a Public Hearing on June 11, 2024 to provide an opportunity for any interested person to be heard. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the levy of assessments as originally proposed or as modified. Following the adoption of this resolution, the Assessor’s Roll will be prepared and filed with the Contra Costa County Auditor’s Office, to be included on the FY 2024-25 tax roll.

Payment of the assessment for each parcel will be made in the same manner and at the same time as payments are made for property taxes. All funds collected through the assessment must be placed in a special fund and can only be used for the purposes stated within this report.
172
City of Oakley SECTION II
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY 4 SECTION II

ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY

CITY OF OAKLEY
STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
On November 5, 1996 California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled "Right to Vote On Taxes Act" which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts.

These new procedures stipulate that even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, future increases to an assessment or annexation of territory to an existing District that creates a new assessment must comply with the provisions of Proposition 218. However, if the increase in assessment were anticipated in the assessment formula (e.g., consumer price index increase or assessment cap) then the assessment would be in compliance with the intent and provisions of Proposition 218.

Future Annexation Information
Generally, developers as a part of their conditions permitting the developer to construct new housing or commercial/industrial developments, construct public improvements such as parks, landscaping and streetlighting. The ongoing operation, maintenance and servicing of these improvements can be financed through the District. Annexation of the development project to the District ensures that the operation, maintenance and servicing of the improvements are specifically paid for by those property owners who directly benefit from the improvements.

In order to comply with the requirements of Proposition 218, the City of Oakley implements the following procedures:
1) Every property owner within the area being annexed will be mailed a ballot, which will allow the property owner to cast their vote on whether to annex into the existing assessment district. A notice describing the assessment, the individual property owner’s maximum annual assessment rate, the duration of the assessment, the reason for the assessment, the basis upon which the assessment is calculated, and the date and time for a public hearing will accompany the ballots.
2) After the close of the set Public Hearing, the ballots, which are returned within 45 days after mailing, will be tabulated to determine whether or not a majority protest against the assessment exists.
173
City of Oakley SECTION II
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY 5 3) The ballots are weighted based on the proportionate amount of their maximum assessment for each Zone they are being annexed into. 4) Publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial and institutional activities.

All property owners within an annex area will be noticed in accordance with Proposition 218 prior to the Public Hearing. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, and after the ballots have been tabulated, the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the maximum assessment rate.
174
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 ENGINEER'S REPORT 6 SECTION III

ENGINEER'S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679

OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE

CITY OF OAKLEY
STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and in accordance with the Resolution of Initiation No. __-24 and Resolution of Intention, accepting the Preliminary Engineer’s Report No. __-24, both adopted on May 14, 2024, by the Oakley City Council, State of California, in connection with the proceedings for:

CITY OF OAKLEY
STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 Herein after referred to as the "Assessment District", I, Kevin Rohani, P.E., the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the "Report" consisting of five (5) parts as follows:

PART A: PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
This part describes the improvements to be maintained within the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file in the Public Works Department.

PART B: ESTIMATE OF COST
This part contains an estimate of the cost of the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of the improvements in each benefit zone as described in Part A (Plans and Specifications). This part includes the estimated expenses for FY 2024-25 in addition to the proposed budget for FY 2024-25 for each of the benefit zones. The detailed budget information is on file in the Public Works Department.

PART C: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
This part incorporates by reference a diagram of the Assessment District showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District, the boundaries of any zones within the Assessment District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District. This diagram is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Oakley.
175
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 ENGINEER'S REPORT 7 PART D: METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
This part contains the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the Assessment District, in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received.

PART E: PROPERTY LIST & ASSESSMENT ROLL
This part contains a list of the parcels and proposed assessment amount on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the District. The list is keyed to the records of the Contra Costa County Assessor, which are incorporated herein by reference and is filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Oakley.

176
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART A 8 PART A

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The assessment district is composed of three (3) benefit zones. Benefit Zone 1 (Community Parks, Landscaping & Recreation Facilities) consists of all the parcels that benefit from the construction, operation, maintenance, and servicing of community park, landscaping, and recreational facilities. Benefit Zone 2 (Streetlighting) consists of all the parcels that benefit from the construction, operation, maintenance, and servicing of streetlighting facilities. Benefit Zone 3 (Interior Landscaping/Neighborhood Parks) consists of twenty-six (26) sub-zones and includes all the parcels that benefit from the construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping and neighborhood park facilities. The improvements associated with each benefit zone are described below:

Benefit Zone 1 – Community Parks, Landscaping & Recreation Facilities The community park, landscaping and recreation facilities consist of, but are not limited to: operation and maintenance of park and recreation facilities, plants, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscape, sidewalks, trails, lights, playground equipment, play courts, restrooms, and associated appurtenant facilities located within the public rights-of-way, public property and designated easements within the boundaries of the Assessment District. A listing of the current parks maintained is listed below and is also shown in Appendix “A”:
 Contribution to Vintage Parkway, O'Hara, Oakley & Gehringer School Parks (these are owned by the Oakley Union Elementary School District)  Main Street Landscaping (segments)
 Empire Avenue Landscaping (segments)
 Crockett Park (4.66 acres)
 Main Street Park (.40 acres)
 Laurel Ball Fields Park (13.63 acres)
 Freedom Basin Park (8.5 acres)
 Laurel Road Landscaping (segments)
 Civic Center Park (1.0 acres)
 Dewey Park (0.20 acres)
 Cypress/Marsh Creek Trailhead
 Neroly Road Landscaping (segments)
 O’Hara Avenue Landscaping (segments)
 Hwy 160 Off Ramp/Main Street Neroly Rd
 Vintage Parkway Landscaping (Main Street to the overpass)  Contribution to Zone 3-17 for Creekside Park (10.0 acres)  Contribution to Zone 3-18 for Nutmeg Park (2.6 acres)  Contribution to Zone 3-19 for Nunn-Wilson Family Park (3.0 acres)  Contribution to Zone 3-22 for Cypress Grove Park (6.0 acres)  Contribution to Zone 3-23 for Shady Oak Park (5.0 acres)  Contribution to Zone 3-25 for Magnolia Park (5.0 acres)  Contribution to Zone 3-26 for Summer Lake Park (17 acres) 177
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART A 9 Benefit Zone 2 - Streetlighting
The lighting facilities consist of, but are not limited to: poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, wiring, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices and appurtenant facilities as required to provide lighting located within the public rights-ofway, public property and designated easements within the boundaries of the Assessment District.

Benefit Zone 3 – Interior Landscaping/Neighborhood Parks The landscaping facilities consist of, but are not limited to: landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, sidewalks, trails, and appurtenant facilities located within public rights-of-way, public property and designated easements within the boundaries of the Assessment District.

The following is a detailed description of each of the twenty-six (26) landscaping subzones located within Benefit Zone 3 and is also shown in Appendix “B”.

Zone 3-1 (Vintage Parkway)
Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements within public street rights-of-way of Subdivisions 6333, 6821, 6862, 7089, 7193, 7229, 7372, 7585, 7654, and portions of 6452, 6576 and 6577, and along the frontage on Big Break Road north until the end of Tract 6333 and on from Big Break Road to Highway 4. Includes Vintage Parkway, Rutherford Way, Piper Lane, and Walnut Meadows Drive.

Zone 3-2 (Oakley Ranch)
Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements along the east side of State Highway 4 and the east side of Charles Way.

Zone 3-3 (Empire)
Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements along the east side of Empire Avenue at the Hemlock Drive intersection.

Zone 3-4 (Oakley Town Center)
Maintain and service landscaping and irrigation system along sidewalk area on Empire Avenue and Highway 4 and median islands on Empire Avenue.

Zone 3-5 (Oak Grove)
Maintain and service landscaping and irrigation facilities system along the southerly side of Laurel Road frontage and along State Highway 4 frontage from Laurel Road south to the north side of Honey Lane. Improvements to the Oak Grove Homeowner’s Association owned Oak Grove Park (0.80 acres) include a play lot, barbecues, and picnic tables located on Parcel B on Subdivision 6922.
178
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART A 10 Zone 3-6 (Laurel Woods/Luna Estates)
Maintain and service walkway area on Laurel Road. Landscaping and irrigation within the public right-of-way along 120 linear feet of the north side of Laurel Road fronting Tract 7489.

Zone 3-7 (South Forty)
Maintain and service landscaping and irrigation system along the frontage areas of Neroly Road.

Zone 3-8 (Claremont)
Landscaping, maintenance, and operation of Claremont Bay Park (0.25 acres) consisting of playground equipment, benches, tables, turf, and irrigation improvements. Also, landscaping and maintenance responsibilities of a parking bay.

Zone 3-9 (Gateway)
Maintain and service landscaping and irrigation system along frontage and sidewalk areas on Cypress Road and Empire Avenue frontage of the Gateway Subdivision.

Zone 3-10 (Countryside aka Village Green)
Landscaping and irrigation facilities of a parkway strip behind the sidewalk along Cypress Road and Lois Lane.

Zone 3-11 (Country Fair aka Meadow Glen)
Landscaping, irrigation, and miscellaneous facilities within the public right-of-way of Highway 4 (400 feet) and Bernard Road (300 feet) of this development.

Zone 3-12 (California Sunrise)
This project consists of the installation of landscaping and irrigation improvements such as water lines, sprinklers, and plants along the north side of Cypress Road fronting Tract 7365 and Waterford Way.

Zone 3-13 (California Visions aka Laurel Heights)
Landscaping, irrigation, and miscellaneous facilities within the public right-of-way along 660 linear feet of the south side of Laurel Avenue east of O'Hara Avenue. The landscaping strip varies in width from three feet to eight feet and is located on Laurel Avenue. Includes maintenance of frontage landscaping on Rose Lane.

Zone 3-14 (Claremont Heritage)
Landscaping, irrigation, and miscellaneous facilities within the public right-of-way along 275 linear feet of the north side of Main Street (State Route 4). The landscaping strip varies in width from three feet to eight feet. Landscaping and irrigation within the public right-of-way along 565 linear feet of Highway 4 (aka Main Street) fronting Tracts 7775, 7366 and 7367.
179
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART A 11 Zone 3-15 (Country Fair aka Meadow Glen II)
Landscaping and irrigation within the public right-of-way along 1,265 linear feet of Gum Tree Road adjacent to Tract 7704 and 452 linear feet frontage along Live Oak Avenue;
Maintain and service landscaping and irrigation system along sidewalk areas on Empire Avenue, El Monte Drive, Holly Drive, and Tate Lane. Includes islands and hardscape across from the subdivisions;
Landscaping and irrigation maintenance of landscape facilities and 750 linear feet of frontage and median landscaping along Oakley Road. Landscape improvements along the frontage of Oakley Road total approximately 1,030 linear feet; Landscaping and irrigation within the public right-of-way along 1,140 linear feet of Empire Avenue and along 550 linear feet of Oakley Road fronting tracts 7385, 7830 through 7833; and
Landscaping and irrigation maintenance for Heather Park (0.25 acres) and Holly Creek Park (6.7 acres) is also included.

Development Plan 3022-94 is one parcel (037-390-101) consisting of 50 affordable senior housing units. The landscape improvements consist of maintaining landscape and irrigation facilities along Oakley Road, approximately 403 linear feet. These are currently maintained by a private entity.

Zone 3-16 (Sundance)
Landscaping within public right-of-way along Almondtree Lane, Highway 4 and Cypress Road, fronting Subdivision 7837, totaling 1,200 linear feet and varying in width from five feet to 21 feet.

Zone 3-17 (Laurel Anne)
Landscaping improvements are located within the public right-of-way, fronting Laurel Road and Highway 4, along the frontage of Subdivisions 6935 and 7809 to their point of intersection. Landscape improvements also include the Laurel Road median islands and Parcel B;
Landscape improvements include frontage along Teton Road located within subdivisions 6963 and 8650;
Landscape improvements total approximately 2,150 linear feet along Laurel Road and Highway 4 and vary in width from ten to fifteen feet. The Laurel Road median improvements are approximately 1,160 linear feet and vary in width from five to sixteen feet;
The maintenance of Harvest Park (0.05 acres) (Parcel “B” of Subdivision 7809); and 180
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART A 12 The maintenance of Creekside Park (10.0 acres) is also included (a portion of the maintenance is funded by Zone 1).

Zone 3-18 (Country Place)
Landscape improvements are located within the public right-of-way fronting Kay Lane, O’Hara Avenue and Carpenter Road. Landscape improvements total approximately 38,000 square feet along Kay Lane, approximately 17,000 square feet along O’Hara Avenue and approximately 3,000 square feet along Carpenter Road; and The maintenance of Nutmeg Park (2.6 acres) located within Subdivision 7640 is also included (a portion of the maintenance is funded by Zone 1).

Zone 3-19 (Laurel Crest)
Landscape improvements are located within the public right-of-way fronting Laurel Road, Brown Road, Oxford Drive, Empire Avenue – East, Carpenter Road, Joshua Street (between Carpenter Road and Pinenut Street) and the Laurel Road and Hampton Way medians. Landscape improvements total approximately 74,000 square feet; and
The maintenance of Nunn-Wilson Family Park (3.0 acres) and Basin (Phase 2) and the Trail along Brown Road are also included (a portion of the park maintenance is funded by Zone 1).

Zone 3-20 (Marsh Creek Glenn)
Landscape improvements include the maintenance of Marsh Creek Glenn Park (2.4 acres), consisting of maintenance of the concrete walkway, the play apparatus, the masonry wall and landscape maintenance in and around the Park, in addition to frontage along Salvador Lane north of Amador Court.

Zone 3-21 (Quail Glen) and Zone 3-21A (4411 Live Oak Avenue) Landscape improvements include the maintenance and operation of landscaping and irrigation, including approximately 5,250 square feet along the Live Oak Avenue frontage of Subdivision 7359 and approximately 2,500 square feet along Neroly Road frontage of Subdivision 7359. In FY 2015-16, Zone 3-21A was annexed into the District and added maintenance of the landscaping along the frontage of Live Oak Avenue and the frontage of El Dorado Road that are adjacent to the parcel located at 4411 Live Oak Avenue.

Zone 3-22 (Cypress Grove)
Landscape improvements include the maintenance and operation of landscaping and irrigation of the following:
 Cypress Road north and south right-of-way, Frank Hengle east and west right-ofway, Picasso Way east and west right-of-way (3.04 acres);  Trail Landscaping (3.40 acres);
 Detention Pond Buffer (2.26 acres);
181
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART A 13  Briarwood Park (old Cypress Grove) (2.0 acres);
 Cypress Grove Park (6.0 acres) (a portion of the maintenance is funded by Zone 1); and
 6’ Fencing along E. Cypress Rd and Picasso Dr (Iron House Elementary School).

Zone 3-23 (South Oakley)
Landscape improvements include the maintenance and operation of landscaping and irrigation of the following:
 Shady Oak Drive right-of-way (.43 acres);
 Simoni Ranch Road right-of-way (1.94 acres);
 Main Street right-of-way (0.54 acres);
 Rose Avenue right-of-way (0.16 acres);
 Carpenter Road right-of-way (0.08 acres);
 Grapevine Way right-of-way (0.09 acres);
 Cinnamon Ridge right-of-way (0.33 acres);
 Entry Trail (0.17 acres);
 Brownstone Road right-of-way landscaping (Subdivision 8530 – 23,810 square feet);
 O’Hara Avenue right-of-way landscaping and median (Subdivision 8530 – 27,480 square feet);
 Neroly Road right-of-way landscaping and medians (Subdivision 8530 – 39,840 square feet);
 O’Hara Avenue right-of-way landscaping (Subdivision 8734 – 15,564 square feet);  Oakley Road right-of-way landscaping (Subdivision 8823 – 4,400 square feet);  Main Street right-of-way landscaping (Subdivision 8916 – 8,800 square feet);  Rose Avenue right-of-way landscaping (Subdivision 8981 – 5,400 square feet);  Rose Avenue right-of-way landscaping (Subdivision 9183 – 30,384 square feet);  Carpenter Road right-of-way (Subdivision 9183 – 10,260 square feet);  Live Oak Ranch Park (1.0 acre);
 Simoni Ranch Park (1.0 acre);
 Riata Park (Subdivision 8530 -1.7 acres);
 Heartwood Park (Subdivision 8916 – 1.5 acres);
 Shady Oak Park (5.0 acres) (a portion of the maintenance is funded by Zone 1);  Rose/Carpenter Park (4.4 acres) – not anticipated to be turned over to the City for maintenance for FY 2024-25 (a portion of the maintenance will be funded by Zone 1); and
 6’ Fencing along Simoni Ranch Road (Gehringer Elementary School).

Zone 3-24 (Reserve/Stonecreek)
Landscape improvements include the maintenance and operation of landscaping and irrigation of the following:
 Teton Road frontage (1.14 acres);
 Sellars Road by Subdivision 8973 (0.77 acres);
 C Street landscaping (0.21 acres);
182
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART A 14  F Street landscaping (3,120 square feet);
 Tamarack Road Weed Abatement (5,096 square feet);
 Teton Road Entry Features at Northwest & Southwest;
 C Street Entry Feature (1,000 square feet);
 Marsh Creek Buffer Area (0.19 acres);
 Stonecreek Park (115,362 square feet) – not anticipated to be turned over to the City for maintenance for FY 2024-25 (a portion of the maintenance will be funded by Zone 1); and
 Teton Road Park (2.91 acres) – not anticipated to be turned over to the City for maintenance for FY 2024-25 (a portion of the maintenance will be funded by Zone 1).

Zone 3-25 (Magnolia Park)
Landscape improvements include the maintenance and operation of landscaping and irrigation, of the following:
 Carpenter right-of-way landscaping (24,900 square feet);  Brown Road right-of-way landscaping (118,800 square feet);  Neroly Road right-of-way landscaping (159,500 square feet);  Neroly Road Median landscaping (34,135 square feet);
 Empire Avenue right-of-way landscaping (16,975 square feet);  Project Entry Streets Median landscaping (1,890 square feet);  Dynasty Drive right-of-way landscaping (5,280 square feet);  Dynasty Drive Median landscaping (725 square feet);
 O’Hara Avenue right-of-way landscaping (32,200 square feet);  Carpenter Trail, Parcel F Subdivision 8731 (158,994 square feet);  Railroad Trail (Old Neroly Road) (82,125 square feet);  Neroly Daffodil Entry Feature, Parcel I Subdivision 8731 (13,131 square feet)  Pedestrian Trail, Parcel J Subdivision 8731 (2,997 square feet);  Pedestrian Trail, Parcel K Subdivision 8731 (3,608 square feet);  Novarina Trail Park, Parcel E Subdivision 8731 (2.0 acres);  Neroly Road, Frontage (Subdivision 9199 – 17,600 square feet);  Pedestrial Trail, Parcel A, Subdivision 9274 (9,155 square feet);  Dynasty Drive right-of-way landscaping (Subdivision 9199 – 1,800 square feet);  Pedestrian Trail, Parcel A Subdivision 9199 (3,224 square feet);  Neroly Road right-of-way (Subdivision 9274 – 42,900 square feet);  Brown Road right-of-way (Subdivision 9274 – 9,900 square feet); and  Pedestrian Trail, Subdivision 9274 (9,155 square feet);  Silver Bell Way right-of-way;
 Daffodil Park, Parcel G Subdivision 8731 (1.78 acres); and  Magnolia Park (5 acres) (a portion of the maintenance is funded by Zone 1). 183
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART A 15 Zone 3-26 (Summer Lake South)
Landscape improvements include the maintenance and operation of landscaping and irrigation, of the following including:
 Lakewood Park (0.58 acres);
 Manresa Park (0.26 acres);
 Sycamore Park (0.24 acres);
 Lakeside Park (1.64 acres);
 Leeward Park (0.71 acres);
 Catamaran Park and Greenbelt (0.79 acres); and
 Summer Lake Park (17.0 acres) (a portion of the maintenance is funded by Zone 1 funds).

In addition, the following Landscape improvements are within the landscape and lighting zone boundaries, however maintenance responsibility belongs to the Homeowner’s Association:
 Phase 1 Summer Lake Drive ROW Streetscape (Cypress Road south to South Well Pump Station & Phase 2 Limits);
 Phase 2 Summer Lake Drive ROW Streetscape (South Well Pump Station north to Cypress Road);
 Phase 1 Cypress Road ROW Streetscape & Entry (Bethel Island Road to second Summer Lake Drive Intersection); and
 Wetlands Frontage Landscape and Wetland.
184
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART B 16 PART B

ESTIMATE OF COST
The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of the park and recreational, streetlighting and landscaping facilities can be recovered by the District. Incidental expenses including administration of the District, engineering fees, legal fees, and all other costs associated with the construction, operation, and maintenance and servicing of the District can also be included.

The estimated FY 2024-25 expenditures for the proposed facilities in the City of Oakley have been provided by City Staff and are estimated as follows:

For a detailed breakdown on the annual operation, maintenance and servicing costs for each zone and sub-zone, refer to Appendix “C”. Appendix C also includes a detail of the Asset Lifecycle Replacement Program for each zone and sub-zone, as well. The Asset Lifecycle Replacement Program detail is used as a guide to calculate approximate replacement costs of the assets in each Zone and sub-zone and establishing reserves necessary to ensure asset replacements and funds for remediation projects are available when needed. Reserves are used to pay for the replacement or remediation of items in the detail but are not limited strictly to those items. The reserves are eligible to fund the replacement, remediation, or improvement of any asset or amenity in the Zone or subzone.

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. Any balance remaining on July 1 at the end of the fiscal year must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

FY 2024-25 Budget Summary
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
Community Parks,
Landscaping &
Recreation Budget
Streetlighting
Budget
Neighborhood
Landscaping &
Parks Budget Total Budget
Annual Revenue*:

Assessments $1,492,757 $259,376 $3,265,860 $5,017,993
Interest Income $19,750 $900 $10,850 $31,500
Other Sources (Gas Tax, Zone 1 Cont. to Zone 3) $889,495 $190,000 $265,000 $1,344,495 Total Revenue: $2,402,002 $450,276 $3,541,710 $6,393,988 Annual Expenses*:

Operating Expenses ($1,893,890) ($430,000) ($2,596,316) ($4,920,206) Incidental Expenses ($386,081) ($64,716) ($777,162) ($1,227,959) Total Expenditures: ($2,279,971) ($494,716) ($3,373,478) ($6,148,165) *When annual revenues are in excess of annual expenses, that money is used to fund reserves in each Zone as appropriate.

Table No. 1
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 185
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART C 17 PART C

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
The boundaries of City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 are completely within the boundaries of the City of Oakley. An Assessment Diagram for the City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1, which incorporates each of the zones for FY 2024-25, is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Oakley and is included on the following pages. A detailed diagram for each of the twenty-six (26) subzones in Zone 3 is referenced in this Report as Appendix “B”.

The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.
186
LEGEND
Zone 1-B Boundary
Zone 1-A Boundary
Future Parks
Zone 1 Boundary & Oakley City Limit
Parks maintained by Zone 1
exclusively
Parks located in Zone 3, but receive
a portion of funding from Zone 1
Parks owned by the School District, but
receive a portion of funding from Zone 1
City of Oakley
Zone 1 -- Community Park,
Landscaping & Recreation Facilities
** Other parks not included on this map are funded through Zone 3 assessments and are shown in Appendix A
* Creekside, Nutmeg, Nunn-Wilson, Cypress Grove, Shady Oak, Rose/Carpenter, Teton, Magnolia and Summer Lake Parks receive a portion of their funding from Zone 1 2,500 0 2,500 5,000 Feet
¯

CYPRESS RD

MAIN ST

SELLERS AVE

LIVE OAK AVE
HWY 4 OAKLEY RDROSE AVE

CONTRA COSTA CANAL

CONTRA COSTA CANAL

EMPIRE AVE

LAUREL RD

BETHEL ISLAND RD

DELTA RD

OHARA AVE

AT & SF RAILROAD
CANAL

MARSH CREEK MAIN ST

CYPRESS RD

NEROLY RD
O'Hara Park
Creekside Park*
Laurel Ball Fields Park
Freedom
Basin
Park
Summer Lake
Park*
Crockett
Park
Vintage Parkway
Park
Shady Oak
Park*
Oakley School
Park
Cypress Grove
Park*
Nutmeg Park*
Magnolia
Park*
Teton Park*
(FUTURE) Rose
/Carpenter Park*
(FUTURE)
Main Street
Park
Nunn-Wilson
Park*
Civic Center
Park Dewey
Park
Gehringer
Elementary
School Park
187
¯
City of Oakley
Zone 2 -- Street Lighting
LEGEND
Zone 2 Boundary
& Oakley City Limit
Zone 2-A Boundary

CYPRESS RD

MAIN ST

SELLERS AVE

LIVE OAK AVE
HWY 4 OAKLEY RDROSE AVE

CONTRA COSTA CANAL

CONTRA COSTA CANAL

EMPIRE AVE

LAUREL RD

BETHEL ISLAND RD

DELTA RD

OHARA AVE

AT & SF RAILROAD
CANAL

MARSH CREEK MAIN ST

CYPRESS RD

NEROLY RD
2,500 0 2,500 5,000 Feet
188

CYPRESS RD

MAIN ST

SELLERS AVE

LIVE OAK AVE
HWY 4 OAKLEY RDROSE AVE

CONTRA COSTA CANAL

CONTRA COSTA CANAL

EMPIRE AVE

LAUREL RD

BETHEL ISLAND RD

DELTA RD

OHARA AVE

AT & SF RAILROAD
CANAL

MARSH CREEK MAIN ST

CYPRESS RD

NEROLY RD
3-12
3-11
3-16
3-23
3-13
3-21 3-03
3-04
3-06
3-08 3-10
3-01
3-26
3-23
3-22
3-25
3-15
3-19
3-09
3-24
3-15
3-20
3-17 3-05
3-23
3-17
3-18
3-07
3-14
3-02
¯
City of Oakley
Zone 3 -- Interior Landscaping/Neighborhood Parks
2,500 0 2,500 5,000 Feet
LEGEND
Oakley City Limit
Zone 3 Boundaries
189
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 21 PART D

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
This section explains the benefits to be derived from the improvements and the methodology used to apportion the total assessments to the properties within the District.

The method used for apportioning the assessment is based upon the relative special benefits to be derived by the properties in each benefit zone of the District over and above the general benefits conferred to the public at large. The assessment is apportioned to each parcel in proportion to the relative cost of the special benefits from the improvements.

Discussion of Benefit
Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by Agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the operation, maintenance, and servicing of park and recreational, streetlighting, and landscaping improvements.

Section 22573 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
“The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000)) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]."
In addition, the 1972 Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax".

Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. “No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”
190
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 22 In addition, Article XIIID provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial and institutional activities.

General versus Special Benefit
In the absence of an annual assessment, the improvements in each benefit zone of the District would not be provided, therefore the improvements are “over and above” what otherwise would be provided in other portions of the City as part of General Services. All the assessment proceeds derived from each benefit zone will be utilized to fund the cost of providing a level of tangible “special benefits” in the form of proximate landscaping and other permanent public improvements. The assessments are also structured to provide specific improvements within each benefit zone, further ensuring the improvements funded by the assessments are of specific and special benefit to property within each benefit zone.

Specific Benefit has been quantified as:
 Unique proximity to improved landscaped areas;
 Access to improved landscape areas;
 Improved views within each Zone; and
 Extension of a property’s outdoor area for properties within close proximity to the improvements.

Although these improvements may be available to the general public at large, the public landscaping and other public improvements in each benefit zone of the District were specifically designed, located and created to provide additional and improved public resources for the direct advantage of property inside the benefit zone, and not the public at large. The boundaries of the benefit zones have been narrowly drawn to include those parcels that receive a direct advantage from the improvements.

Other properties that are outside a benefit zone do not enjoy the unique proximity, access, views, and other special benefit factors described previously. Moreover, many of the homes and other improvements on parcels in the benefit zones would not have been built if the assessments were not established because an assessment for public landscaping was a condition of development approval.

Without the assessments, the public improvements within the benefit zones would not be maintained and would turn into brown, unmaintained and unusable public improvements and public lands. If this happened, it would create a significant and material negative impact on the desirability, utility, and value of property in the benefit zone. The improvements are, therefore, clearly above what otherwise would be provided. In fact, it is reasonable to assume that if assessments were not collected and the improvements 191
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 23 were not maintained as a result, properties in the benefit zones would decline in desirability, utility, and value by significantly more than the amount of the assessments.

It is therefore concluded that all the landscaping improvements funded by the assessments are of 99% special benefit to the identified benefiting properties located within the benefit zones and that the value of the special benefits from such improvements to property in the benefit zones reasonably exceeds the cost of the assessments for every assessed parcel in the benefit zones. (In other words, as required by Proposition 218: the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each parcel reasonably exceeds the cost of the assessments.)
The City owns, maintains, rehabilitates, and replaces curb and gutter along the border of the benefit zone improvements. This curb and gutter serves to support, contain, retain, and manage irrigation flow and plant growth and provide a boundary for the improvements. The contribution from the City towards general benefit from the maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement of the curb and gutter is conservatively estimated to be 1%.

BENEFIT ZONES
Because there are varying degrees of improvements throughout the boundaries of the District, three (3) separate and distinct benefit zones have been created. Benefit Zone 1 consists of all the parcels that benefit from the construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of park and recreational facilities. In addition, Benefit Zone 1 consists of two sub-zones which includes all parcels that benefit from the construction of new park facilities. Benefit Zone 2 consists of all the parcels that benefit from the construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of streetlighting facilities. In addition, Benefit Zone 2 consists of one sub-zone which includes all parcels that benefit from the increased energy costs of streetlights. Benefit Zone 3 consists of twenty-six (26) sub-zones and includes all the parcels that benefit from the construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping facilities.

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The total operation, maintenance and servicing cost for the park and recreational, streetlighting, and landscaping improvements are apportioned in accordance with the methodology that is consistent with standard assessment engineering practices. The method for spreading the costs to each parcel is based on the Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) factor.

Since the assessment is levied on the owners of properties as shown on the tax rolls, the assessments must be assigned by Assessor's Parcel Number. If assessments were to be distributed by parcel, not considering land use, this would not be equitable, because a single-family parcel would be paying the same as a 50-unit apartment parcel or a large commercial establishment. Therefore, as previously stated, the total assessment costs are distributed to each parcel of land based on their pro-rata share of EDUs compared to the total number of EDUs within a benefit zone or benefit sub-zone. For example, if a single-family residential parcel is assigned 1.00 EDU and there is a total of 100 EDUs 192
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 24 within their benefit zone then the single family residential parcel would be responsible for

1.00% (1.00 EDU/100.00 EDUs) of the annual budget for that benefit zone.

Below is a summary of the assessment methodology used to allocate the costs for the operation, maintenance, and servicing costs of the park and recreational, streetlighting, and landscaping improvements.

BENEFIT ZONE 1

COMMUNITY PARKS, LANDSCAPING AND RECREATION FACILITIES BENEFIT

DETERMINATION
The overall quality of life and desirability of an area is enhanced when public park and recreational facilities are in place, improved, operable, safe, clean, and maintained.

Conversely, property desirability decreases when park and recreational facilities are unsafe or destroyed by the elements or vandalism.

Property desirability in an area also increases when there is an increase in the number of parks, recreation centers and sports facilities. These park and recreational facilities enable property owners to participate in sporting events, leisure activities, picnics, organized social events and other miscellaneous activities.

Studies in a number of communities, including counties and cities throughout the United States, have indicated that recreation areas and facilities, if well maintained and wisely administered, have caused a marked increase in the property values of parcels in the community. Consequently, such recreation and park facilities have proved to be an important factor in maintaining a sound economic condition and a high standard of livability in the community. These studies confirm the opinion long held by planning authorities as to the economic value of parks and recreational facilities in a community. “The recreation value is realized as a rise in the value of land and other property in or near the recreation area, and is of both private interest to the landowner and others, holding an economic stake in the area, and of public interest to the taxpayers, who have a stake” (National Recreation and Park Association, June 1985) “Recreation and park amenities are central components in establishing the quality of life in a community [businesses’] main resource is their employees for whom quality of life is an important issue. The availability and attractiveness of local parks and programs influences some companies’ relocation decisions the presence of a park encourages real estate development around it.” (California Parks & Recreation, Winter 1997) The benefit of parks and other recreational facilities to residential and commercial/industrial properties has been summarized by a number of studies. The United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, in a publication of June 1984, concluded that:
 "Parks and recreation stimulate business and generate tax revenues."  "Parks and recreation help conserve land, energy, and resources." 193
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 25  "An investment in parks and recreation helps reduce pollution and noise, makes communities more livable, and increases property values."  "Public recreation benefits all employers by providing continuing opportunities to maintain a level of fitness throughout one's working life, and through helping individuals cope with the stress of a fast-paced and demanding life." Proper maintenance and operation of the parks within the District benefit those properties within the service areas of the parks by providing environmental quality and recreational enhancement. The amount of benefit received will vary with the different land use on the property. There are two categories from which the total benefit of a parcel is derived:

1. Environmental Quality Benefit. The improvement of the quality of air, visual aesthetics, and attractiveness of the community as a place to live and work and do business.

2. Recreation Enhancement Benefit. The availability of usable and safe park and recreational facilities.

Recent studies have shown that adequate park and recreation facilities and recreation programs help to reduce crime and vandalism. This results in a savings to property owners by improved property values and promotes the well-being of the community.

COMMUNITY PARKS, LANDSCAPING AND RECREATION FACILITIES BENEFIT

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The single-family residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for the calculation of assessments and is defined as one (1) Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Commercial and industrial parcels benefit similarly to residential parcels because of increased property values and the ability to have their workers and patrons use the park and recreational facilities. Commercial and industrial parcels are assessed based on their acreage because larger parcels have the ability to generate larger pedestrian flows. The methodology used to assign EDUs to other land uses in proportion to the benefit they receive relative to the single-family residential parcel is shown below.

Developed Single Family Residential - The developed single-family parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of the benefit assessments. This basic unit shall be called an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Parcels designated as developed single family residential uses per the Contra Costa County land use code, or those parcels that have had a building permit pulled prior to July 1 are assessed one (1.00) EDU.

Developed Multiple Residential - The EDUs for land designated as developed multifamily uses which includes condominiums, mobile homes, and apartments are assessed a factor of one-half (0.50) EDU per dwelling unit (e.g. a parcel with a 100-unit apartment would be assessed 50 EDUs). Based on data from representative cities in Northern California, the multiple family residential factor of 50% is determined by the statistical proportion of relative trip generation from various types of residential uses, in combination with density per unit.
194
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 26 Developed Commercial/Industrial, Recreational, Institutional, and Other Miscellaneous Uses - Developed commercial and industrial properties include commercial, industrial, recreational, institutional, or miscellaneous uses per the Contra Costa County land use codes. The parcels are assessed based upon the acreage of the parcel. In converting developed commercial/industrial properties to EDUs, the factor used was from the Contra Costa County's average single-family lot residential lot size. The parcels will be assessed one (1.00) EDU for the first acre or any portion thereof, and one (1.00) EDU/acre for each additional acre or any portion thereof, up to a maximum of three (3.00) EDUs (3.00 acres). The minimum number of EDUs per parcel will be one (1.00) EDU.

Undeveloped Single Family Residential - Parcels defined as undeveloped single-family residential parcels will be assessed at 50% of the developed single-family rate.

Undeveloped Non-Single Family Residential - Parcels defined as undeveloped nonsingle family residential will be assessed at a 50% of the developed commercial/industrial rate. These parcels include undeveloped multi-family residential, commercial/industrial, recreational, institutional, and other miscellaneous parcels. These parcels will be assessed at 0.50 EDUs per acre or any portion thereof, with a minimum of 0.50 EDU per parcel and a maximum of 1.50 EDUs per parcel (3.00 acres). Incremental acreage greater than 3.00 acres is considered to be open space area and therefore receives no further assessment.

Exempt - Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-way, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial, and institutional activities.

COMMUNITY PARKS, LANDSCAPING AND RECREATION FACILITIES

ASSESSMENT RATES BY ZONE
The Fiscal Year 2024-25 Assessment Rates for Zone 1 are shown below. For further detail regarding annual revenues and expenditures in Zone 1, please see Appendix “C” in this Report.
 Zone 1 (Community Parks, Landscaping & Recreation Facilities) 9,098.85 EDUs for FY 2024-25
Maximum Rate: $31.88/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $31.88/EDU
 Zone 1-A (Community Parks, Landscaping & Recreation Facilities) Zone 1-A includes parcels added after FY 2004-05 that benefit from the construction, operation, and maintenance of park and recreation facilities that are anticipated to 195
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 27 meet the City’s Parks & Recreation Master Plan 2021 goal of 6.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. Starting with FY 2004-05 through FY 2015-16, all parcels with new developments have been annexed into Zone 1-A. In January 2016, the City formed Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Parks, Streetlight, Landscape, and Stormwater Services) and beginning FY 2016-17 all parcels with new developments have been annexed into Community Facilities District No. 2015-2.

Formed: January 12, 2004 (Sub 8655)
2,633.31 EDUs for FY 2024-25
Subdivision 8727 (27 units) annexed June 14, 2004
Subdivision 8725 (48 units) annexed FY 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 7655 (28 units) annexed FY 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 7590 (60 units) annexed FY 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 7760 (67 units) annexed FY 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 7426 (21 units) annexed FY 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 8765 (25 units) annexed FY 2005-06, November 8, 2004 Subdivisions 8678 (100 units), 8679 (201 units) & 8680 (240 units), FY 2006-07, November 14, 2005
Subdivisions 7662 (215 units), 7681 (40 units), & 8541 (354 units), FY 2006-07, February 13, 2006
Subdivisions 8737 (58 units), 8973 (176 units), 8994 (109 units), FY 2006-07; June 12, 2006
Subdivision 8731 (388 units), FY 2006-07; November 13, 2006 Subdivision 8734 (26 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8736 (42 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8916 (41 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8530 (110 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8981 (17 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8823 (6 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8843 (13 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8985 (1 unit) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 9183 (11 units) annexed FY 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Subdivision 9199 (43 units) annexed FY 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Subdivision 9274 (117 units) annexed FY 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Laurel Plaza Shopping Center (3.08 acres of Commercial) annexed FY 2012-13, August 9, 2011
Immanuel Baptist Church (5.00 EDUs) annexed FY 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Corporation for Better Housing (196 MFR and 208 Senior units) annexed FY 2012- 13, August 9, 2011
Minor Subdivision 09-976 (0.99 Acres) annexed FY 2012-13, August 9, 2011 4411 Live Oak Avenue (041-021-029) (1 unit) annexed FY 2015-16, July 14, 2015 Subdivision 9104 (20 units) annexed FY 2015-16, July 14, 2015 The maximum assessment rate of $211.33 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit for Benefit Zone 1-A was approved in FY 2004-05, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay 196
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 28 Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI was the rate set on April 2004 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 198.3. The CPI as of February 2024 is 345.15.

Maximum Rate: $367.83/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $367.83/EDU
 Zone 1-B (Summer Lake Community Park) – Subdivisions 8900, 8955, & 7562 Zone 1-B includes parcels benefiting from the Summer Lake Community Park and was created by Contra Costa County in FY 2005-06 as part of the Summer Lake Development to provide additional funding for the Summer Lake Park and other Community Parks, landscaping, and recreational facilities.

Formed: April 25, 2006 (by Contra Costa County)
636.37 EDUs for FY 2024-25
The maximum assessment rate of $805.71 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit for Benefit Zone 1-B was approved in FY 2005-06, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI was the rate set on June 2005 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 201.2. The CPI as of February 2024 is 345.15. The maximum rate for FY 2024-25 is $1,382.16/EDU. However, the anticipated FY 2024-25 expenditures are less than the maximum assessment rate would produce in revenue, therefore the actual rate for FY 2024-25 will be set at $367.83/EDU, which is equal to the rate in Zone 1-A.

Maximum Rate: $1,382.16/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $367.83/EDU
BENEFIT ZONE 2

STREETLIGHTING BENEFIT DETERMINATION
The proper functioning of streetlighting throughout the City of Oakley is imperative for the welfare of the property owners. Streetlighting provides protection to pedestrian traffic by illuminating the sidewalk and street crossing areas during nighttime hours. In addition, the proper operation, maintenance, and servicing of a streetlighting system benefits properties by providing additional security for the pedestrian traffic and reduces the possibility of vandalism to property during nighttime hours.

STREETLIGHTING BENEFIT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The degree of benefit for each parcel is determined by the use of each individual parcel, the intensity of illumination provided, the number of pedestrians generated, and the enhanced security during hours of darkness. Benefit Zone 2 has been established to identify the parcels that benefit from these streetlighting improvements. 197
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 29 Developed Single Family Residential – The single-family residential parcel is considered one unit of benefit (1.00 EDU). All other land uses have been analyzed to determine the benefit they receive from the intensity of illumination provided, the number of pedestrians generated by their property, and the enhanced security to their property during hours of darkness compared to that of a single-family residential parcel.

Other Land Uses – All other land uses have been analyzed to determine the intensity of illumination provided, the number of pedestrians generated by their property, and the enhanced security to their property during hours of darkness. For a detailed listing of the equivalent dwelling unit factors for each land use refer to Appendix “D”.

Exempt – Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-way, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial, and institutional activities.

FY 2024-25 - STREETLIGHTING ASSESSMENT RATES BY ZONE
The FY 2024-25 Assessment Rates for Zone 2 are shown below. For further detail regarding Zone 2 annual revenues and expenditures, please see Appendix “C” in this Report.
 Zone 2 (Oakley Streetlighting Facilities)
9,143.50 EDUs for FY 2024-25
Maximum Rate: $14.94/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $14.94/EDU
 Zone 2-A (Oakley Streetlighting Facilities)
Zone 2-A includes parcels that benefit from the construction, operation, and maintenance of increased lighting after FY 2006-07. Starting with FY 2004-05 through FY 2015-16, all parcels with new developments have been annexed into Zone 2-A. In January 2016, the City formed Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Parks, Streetlight, Landscape, and Stormwater Services) and beginning FY 2016-17 all parcels with new developments have been annexed into Community Facilities District No. 2015-2.

Formed: June 12, 2006
1,682.50 EDUs for FY 2024-25
Subdivision 8731 (403.5 EDUs), FY 2006-07; November 13, 2006 Subdivision 7562, 8900, & 8955 (625.5 EDUs), FY 2007-08 Subdivision 8734 (26 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 198
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 30 Subdivision 8736 (42 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8916 (41 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8530 (110 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8981 (17 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8823 (6 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8843 (13 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8985 (1 unit annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 9183 (10 units) annexed FY 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Subdivision 9199 (43 units) annexed FY 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Subdivision 9274 (117 units) annexed FY 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Laurel Plaza Shopping Center (3.08 acres of Commercial) annexed FY 2012-13, August 9, 2011
Immanuel Baptist Church (11.00 EDUs) annexed FY 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Corporation for Better Housing (196 MFR and 208 Senior units) annexed FY 2012- 13, August 9, 2011
Minor Subdivision 09-976 (0.99 Acres) annexed FY 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Summer Lake South Development
4411 Live Oak Avenue (041-021-029) (1 unit) annexed FY 2015-16, July 14, 2015 Subdivision 9104 (20 units) annexed FY 2015-16, July 14, 2015 The maximum assessment rate of $42.81 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit for Benefit Zone 2-A was approved in FY 2005-06, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI was the rate set on April 2005 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 202.50. The CPI as of February 2024 is 345.15.

Maximum Rate: $72.97/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $72.97/EDU
BENEFIT ZONE 3

INTERIOR LANDSCAPING/NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Trees, landscaping, hardscaping and appurtenant facilities, if well maintained, provide beautification, shade, and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings. In Parkways and Land Values, written by John Nolan and Henry V. Hubbard in 1937, it is stated:
"... there is no lack of opinion, based on general principals and experience and common sense, that parkways do in fact add value to property, even though the amount cannot be determined exactly. Indeed, in most cases where public money has been spent for parkways the assumption has been definitely made that the proposed parkway will show a provable financial profit to the City. It has been believed that the establishment of parkways causes a rise in real estate values throughout the City, or in parts of the City,..."
199
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 31 It should be noted that the definition of "parkways" above may include the roadway as well as the landscaping alongside the roadway.

Proper maintenance and operation of the roadway landscaping provides beautification and enhancement of the desirability of surroundings. The roadway landscaping maintained by each subzone typically includes the entryways into each geographical area and as such provide beautification to the subzone. These improvements provide special and direct benefit to each property located within the subzone.

LANDSCAPING BENEFIT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The single-family residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for the calculation of assessments and is defined as one (1) Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Commercial and industrial parcels benefit similarly to residential parcels because of increased property values and the desirability of their location. Commercial and industrial parcels are assessed based on their acreage because larger parcels have the ability to generate larger pedestrian flows. The methodology used to assign EDUs to other land uses in proportion to the benefit they receive relative to the single-family residential parcel are shown below.

Developed Single Family Residential - The developed single-family parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of the benefit assessments. Parcels designated as developed single family residential uses per the Contra Costa County land use code or those parcels that have had a building permit pulled prior to July 1 are assessed one (1.00) EDU.

Developed Multiple Residential - The EDUs for land designated as developed multifamily uses which includes condominiums, mobile homes, and apartments are assessed a factor of one-half (0.50) EDU per dwelling unit (e.g. a parcel with a 100-unit apartment would be assessed 50 EDUs). Based on data from representative cities in Northern California, the multiple family residential factor of 50% is determined by the statistical proportion of relative trip generation from various types of residential uses, in combination with density per unit.

Developed Commercial/Industrial, Recreational, Institutional, and Other Miscellaneous Uses - Developed commercial and industrial properties include commercial, industrial, recreational, institutional, or miscellaneous uses per the Contra Costa County land use codes. The parcels are assessed based upon the acreage of the parcel. In converting developed commercial/industrial properties to EDUs, the factor used was from the Contra Costa County's average single-family lot residential lot size. The parcels will be assessed one (1.00) EDU for the first acre or any portion thereof, and one (1.00) EDU/acre for each additional acre or any portion thereof, up to a maximum of three (3.00) EDUs (3.00 acres). The minimum number of EDUs per parcel will be one (1.00) EDU.

Undeveloped Single Family Residential - Parcels defined as undeveloped single-family residential parcels will be assessed at 50% of the developed single-family rate. 200
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 32 Undeveloped Non-Single Family Residential - Parcels defined as undeveloped nonsingle family residential will be assessed at a 50% of the developed commercial/industrial rate. These parcels include undeveloped multi-family residential, commercial/industrial, recreational, institutional, and other miscellaneous parcels. These parcels will be assessed at 0.50 EDUs per acre or any portion thereof, with a minimum of 0.50 EDU per parcel and a maximum of 1.50 EDUs per parcel (3.00 acres). Incremental acreage greater than 3.00 acres is considered to be open space area and therefore receives no further assessment.

Exempt - Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-way, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial, and institutional activities.

FY 2024-25 - LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT RATES BY ZONE
The FY 2024-25 Assessment Rates for each of the Subzones in Zone 3 are shown below.

For further details regarding the annual revenue and expenditures for each Subzone, please see Appendix “C” in this Report.
 Zone 3-1 (Vintage Parkway) Subdivisions 6333, por. 6452 & 6576 & 6577, 6821, 6862, 7089, 7193, 7229, 7372, 7585, & 7654
Formed: July 16, 1985
1,275.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $57.86/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $57.86/EDU
 Zone 3-2 (Oakley Ranch) Subdivision 6634
Formed: April 21, 1987
133.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $198.84/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $198.84/EDU
 Zone 3-3 (Empire) Subdivision 6656
Formed: June 16, 1987

45.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $100.76/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $100.76/EDU
201
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 33  Zone 3-4 (Oakley Town Center) Subdivision 7045
Formed: May 9, 1989

9.17 Acres
Maximum Rate: $1,193.16/Acre
FY 2024-25 Rate: $1,193.16/Acre
 Zone 3-5 (Oak Grove) Subdivisions 6922 & 6927
Formed: August 13, 1991
Additional Parcels Annexed: June 20, 1995
149.50 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $190.00/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $190.00/EDU
 Zone 3-6 (Laurel Woods/Luna Estates) Subdivisions 6971 & 7489.

Formed: August 1, 1989; Tract 7489: April 28, 1992

60.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $127.80/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $127.80/EDU
 Zone 3-7 (South Forty) Subdivision 6969
Formed: August 7, 1990

53.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $185.00/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $185.00/EDU
 Zone 3-8 (Claremont) Subdivision 7163
Formed: August 13, 1991

50.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $152.56/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $152.56/EDU
202
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 34  Zone 3-9 (Gateway) Subdivisions 6394, 6488, 6571, 6613, 6664, 6726, 6727, 6762, 6764 & 6858.

Formed: July 31, 1990
459.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $40.00/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $40.00/EDU
 Zone 3-10 (Countryside aka Village Green) Subdivisions 7164, & 7293 Formed: October 2, 1990

21.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $125.00/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $125.00/EDU
 Zone 3-11 (Country Fair aka Meadow Glen) Subdivision 6840 Formed: August 6, 1991

32.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $169.48/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $169.48/EDU
 Zone 3-12 (California Sunrise) Subdivision 7365
Formed: November 19, 1991
128.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $27.36/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $27.36/EDU
 Zone 3-13 (California Visions aka Laurel Heights) Subdivision 7667 Formed: November 17, 1992

96.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $125.00/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $125.00/EDU
203
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 35  Zone 3-14 (Claremont Heritage) Subdivisions 7775, 7367, and 7366 Formed as Zone 41: November 17, 1992
Tracts 7366, 7367 Annexed: July 26, 1994
114.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $160.00/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $160.00/EDU
 Zone 3-15 (Country Fair aka Meadow Glen II) Subdivisions 6867, 6980, 6996, 7003, 7090, 7165, 7330, 7368, 7385, 7704, 7707, 7808, 7830, 7831, 7832, 7833, 8725, 7655, 7590, 7760, 7426 8823, 8843, & DR 3022-94
Formed: July 26, 1994
888.50 EDUs
Subdivision 8725 (48 units) annexed FY 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 7655 (28 units) annexed FY 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 7590 (60 units) annexed FY 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 7760 (67 units) annexed FY 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 7426 (21 units) annexed FY 2004-05, July 12, 2004 Subdivision 8823 (6 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8843 (13 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 There are also 50 additional senior units located within Zone 3-15, but the improvements are privately maintained. The maximum annual assessment for the 50 senior units is $8,541.00. The applicant (Ecumenical Association for Housing) requested that the landscaping improvements for this development be maintained privately because of the manner in which the project was designed. By having this area privately landscaped, it will allow more privacy for the senior citizen residents.

The estimated maintenance costs for DP3022-94 will therefore not be included in the annual maintenance cost in FY 2024-25.

Maximum Rate: $138.00/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $138.00/EDU
 Zone 3-16 (Sundance) Subdivision 7837
Formed: December 20, 1994

81.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $110.00/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $110.00/EDU
204
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 36  Zone 3-17 (Laurel Anne) Subdivisions 6935, 6963, 7809, 8650, 8708, 8748, 8752, 8816, & 8822
Formed: June 20, 1995
321.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $273.16/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $273.16/EDU
 Zone 3-18 (Country Place) Subdivisions 6968, 7640, MS 7-95, & 7946 Formed: June 20, 1995
Subdivision 6968 (42 units) annexed FY 2002-03
130.00 EDUs
Maximum Rate: $180.00/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $180.00/EDU
 Zone 3-19 (Laurel Crest) Subdivisions 7630, 7657, 7658, 8168, 8169, 8403, 8440, & 8655
Formed: May 5, 1998
438.00 EDUs
Sub 7658, 8168, 8169, 8656 (154 units) annexed FY 2001-02 Sub 8403 (72 units) annexed FY 2002-03, November 13, 2001 Sub 8655 (34 units) annexed FY 2004-05, January 12, 2004 Maximum Rate: $200.00/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $200.00/EDU
 Zone 3-20 (Marsh Creek Glenn) Subdivisions 7689, 8391, 8504, 8648, 8727, & 8765 Formed: May 14, 2001
288.00 EDUs
Subdivision 8504 (12 units) annexed September 9, 2002
Subdivision 8727 (27 units) annexed FY 2004-05, June 14, 2004 Subdivision 8765 (25 units) annexed FY 2005-06, November 8, 2004 The maximum assessment rate for Benefit Zone 3-20 was approved in FY 2001-02 at $225.00 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco 205
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 37 Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI is the rate set on June 30, 2001 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 190.9. The CPI as of February 2024 is 345.15.

Maximum Rate: $406.80/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $406.80/EDU
 Zone 3-21 (Quail Glen) Subdivision 7359, 7235, 7358, & 7467 Formed: July 8, 2002
Subdivisions 7235, 7358 & 7467 (67 units) annexed September 2002 103.00 EDUs
4411 Live Oak Avenue (041-021-029) (1 unit) annexed FY 2015-16, July 14, 2015

1.00 EDU
The maximum assessment rate for Benefit Zone 3-21 was approved in FY 2002-03 at $200.00 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI is the rate set on June 30, 2002 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 193.2. The maximum assessment rate for Benefit Zone 3-21A was approved in FY 2015-16 at $895.32 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI for Zone 3-21A is the rate set on February 28, 2015 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 254.91. The CPI as of February 2024 is 345.15.

Zone 3-21 Maximum Rate: $357.30/EDU
Zone 3-21 FY 2024-25 Rate: $357.30/EDU
Zone 3-21A Maximum Rate: $1,212.27/EDU
Zone 3-21A FY 2024-25 Rate: $1,212.27/EDU
 Zone 3-22 (Cypress Grove) Subdivision 8678, 8679, & 8680 Formed: November 14, 2005
589.00 EDUs
The maximum assessment rate for Benefit Zone 3-22 was approved in FY 2006-07 at $343.90 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI is the rate set on April 2006 by the 206
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 38 Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 208.90. The CPI as of February 2024 is 345.15.

Maximum Rate: $568.19/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $568.19/EDU
 Zone 3-23 (South Oakley) Subdivisions 7662, 7681, 8541, 8530, 8734, 8736, 8916, 8981, 9183 & 9104.

Formed: February 13, 2006
755.50 EDUs
Subdivision 8530 (110 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8734 (26 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8736 (42 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8916 (41 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 8981 (17 units) annexed FY 2007-08, July 9, 2007 Subdivision 9183 (11 units) annexed FY 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Subdivision 9104 (20 units) annexed FY 2015-16, July 14, 2015 The maximum assessment rate for Benefit Zone 3-23 was approved in FY 2006-07 at $398.60 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI is the rate set on April 2006 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 208.90. The CPI as of February 2024 is 345.15.

Maximum Rate: $658.55/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $658.55/EDU
 Zone 3-24 (Reserve/Stonebrook) Subdivision 8737, 8973, 8994 Formed: January 12, 2006
171.50 EDUs
The maximum assessment rate for Benefit Zone 3-24 was approved in FY 2006-07 at $598.73 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI is the rate set on April 2006 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 208.90. The CPI as of February 2024 is 345.15. However, in FY 2024-25 the rate assessed will be $499.75/EDU.

Maximum Rate: $989.24/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $499.75/EDU
207
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART D 39  Zone 3-25 (Magnolia Park) Subdivision 8731
Formed: November 13, 2006
554.66 EDUs
Subdivision 9199 (43 units) annexed FY 2012-13, August 9, 2011 Subdivision 9274 (117 units) annexed FY 2012-13, August 9, 2011 The maximum assessment rate for Benefit Zone 3-25 was approved in FY 2006-07 at $1,100.55 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI is the rate set on June 2006 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 209.10. The CPI as of February 2024 is 345.15.

Maximum Rate: $1,816.62/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $1,816.62/EDU
 Zone 3-26 (Summer Lake South) Subdivision 8900, 8955, & 7562.

Formed: April 25, 2006 (by Contra Costa County)
632.37 EDUs
The maximum assessment rate for Benefit Zone 3-26 was approved in FY 2005-06 at $1,353.53 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, which may be annually adjusted based upon the previous year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers. The base CPI is the rate set on June 2005 by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics which was 201.20. The CPI as of February 2024 is 345.15. However, in FY 2024-25 the rate assessed will be $968.50 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit.

Maximum Rate: $2,389.47/EDU
FY 2024-25 Rate: $968.50/EDU
208
City of Oakley SECTION III
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 PART E 40 PART E

PROPERTY OWNER LIST & ASSESSMENT ROLL
The total assessment amount for each Zone and the proposed assessment amount apportioned to each parcel for FY 2024-25, in proportion to the benefit received by each parcel from the improvements, is contained in the Assessment Roll, which is on file in the Office of City Clerk of the City of Oakley and shown in Appendix “E”.

The Assessment Roll includes a list of all parcel numbers within the District that have been updated to match the last equalized Property Tax Roll of the Contra Costa County Assessor, which by reference is hereby made a part of this report. The last equalized Property Tax Roll includes a description of each parcel and shall govern for all details concerning the description of the parcels.

The total proposed assessments for the 2024-25 Fiscal Year are $1,492,757 for community park, landscaping and recreation facilities, $259,376 for streetlighting facilities, and $3,265,860 for landscaping facilities for a total of $5,017,993. .
209
City of Oakley
Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A
Benefit Zone 1 (Community Parks, Landscaping & Recreation) Detailed Maintenance Diagrams
210

CYPRESS RD

MAIN ST

SELLERS AVE
HWY 4ROSE AVE

CONTRA COSTA CANAL

CONTRA COSTA CANAL

LAUREL RD

BETHEL ISLAND RD

DELTA RD

OHARA AVE

AT & SF RAILROAD
CANAL

MARSH CREEK MAIN ST
O'Hara Park CYPRESS RD
Creekside Park*
Laurel Ball Fields Park
Freedom
Basin
Park
Summer Lake
Park*
Crockett
Park
Vintage Parkway
Park
Shady Oak
Park*
Oakley School
Park
Cypress Grove
Park*
Nutmeg Park*
Magnolia
Park*
Teton Park*
(FUTURE)
Rose
/Carpenter Park*
(FUTURE)
Main Street
Park
Nunn-Wilson
Park*
Civic Center
Park
Dewey
Park
Gehringer
Elementary
School Park
Marsh Creek
Trail Head
*
M
C
a
r
g
e
n
e
o
k
li
s
a
id
a
e
n
,
d
N
S
u
u
t
m
me
m
g
e
,
r
N
L
u
a
n
k
n
e
-
P
W
ar
il
k
s
s
o
r
n
e
,
c
C
ei
y
v
p
e
r
a
es
p
s
or
G
t
r
i
o
o
v
n
e,
of
S
t
h
h
a
e
d
i
y
r f
O
u
a
n
k
d
,
in
R
g
o
f
s
r
e
o
/C
m
ar
Z
p
o
e
n
n
e
t
1 er, Teton,
Text
¯
0 2,500
Feet
Legend
Parks
Parcels
¯
0 2,500
Feet