AGENDA
REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY
COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND SPECIAL MEETING OF THE OAKLEY
PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
Tuesday, May 28, 2024
6:30 PM
Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California 94561.
Unless stated otherwise on the agenda, every item on the agenda is exempt from CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15378, 15301, 15323 and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065.
MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley will create a resilient future that fosters and attracts a vibrant and evolving community that welcomes and values all people.
VISION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley celebrates our unique Delta lifestyle and small-town feel where we Live in a safe, dynamic community, Work together to build the future, and Play in our own backyard.
Agendas are posted in Oakley at Oakley City Hall-3231 Main Street, outside the gym at Delta Vista Middle School-4901 Frank Hengel Way and outside the Library at Freedom High School-1050 Neroly Road.
Agendas are also posted on the City’s Internet Website www.ci.oakley.ca.us.
A complete packet of information containing staff reports and exhibits related to each item is available for public review prior to an Oakley City Council and/or City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority meeting at Oakley City Hall, 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Oakley City Council, Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency or Oakley Public Financing Authority regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection, during regular business hours, at the front counter in the Main Lobby of the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Agendas may be picked up at the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 for no charge. To request information regarding placement on the City’s agenda e-mail distribution list, please contact us at (925) 625-7000.
The City of Oakley provides social media options to stay connected to City Hall through Facebook, Twitter, Next Door and Instagram. Other opportunities to connect with City Hall include Engage In Oakley, Oakley OnDemand on the City's website, and by emailing [email protected]. 1 If you have a physically challenging condition and require special accommodations, please call the City Clerk’s office at (925) 625-7000.
Please keep cell phones/electronic devices turned off during the meeting. Please be advised that City Council meetings are video recorded and attendees may appear on video.
Information Regarding Public Comment
Members of the public may address the Council on items of interest that are within the City’s jurisdiction. In compliance with State law, the council may not take actionor have discussion on any item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. Public comment on items not listed on the agenda will be heard under the Public Comments section of the agenda. Public comments on items listed on the agenda will be heard as the Mayor calls the items. In compliance with State law, the Council may not take action on an item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. If you would like to speak on any agenda item, please fill out a public speaker card available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk seated in the Council Chamber prior to the agenda item being called. The Mayor will call you by name to the podium to hear your comment.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES. Online public comments are accepted until 5 p.m. the day of the meeting and can be submitted at
https://www.ci.oakley.ca.us/online-public-comment-card/.
1.OPENING MATTERS
1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority
1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag (Pearl Joudrey, Almond Grove Elementary Student)
1.3 Update from Contra Costa Water District (Vice President, Antonio Martinez)
1.4 Update from Diablo Water District (Dan Muelrath, General Manager)
1.5 Update from Contra Costa Mosquito & Vector Control District (Michael Krieg)
2.PUBLIC COMMENTS
2 At this time, the public is permitted to address the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority on non-agendized items.
3.COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS
4.CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are typically non-controversial in nature and are considered for approval by the Oakley City Council/ Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority with one single action. Members of the audience, Staff or the Oakley City Council/ Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority who would like an item removed from the Consent Calendar for purposes of public input may request the Mayor remove the item. The public may request to remove an item(s) to provide input by completing a public speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk prior to the item(s) being called by the Mayor.
4.1 Approve Minutes from the Regular Joint City Council/City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority Meeting held May 14, 2024 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk
Minutes 05-14-24
4.2 Report Out of Closed Session Memo (Derek Cole, City Attorney) Memo
4.3 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement for Heating, Ventilation and Air-Conditioning (HVAC) Preventative Maintenance and Repair Services with Prime Mechanical Service, Inc. for Fiscal Years (FY) 2024/25 and 2025/26 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report
1. Resolution
2. Prime Mechanical Proposal
4.4 Adopt a Resolution accepting the work associated with Capital Improvement Project Number 295 – Fiscal Year (FY) 2023/24 Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Repair and Replacement Project (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
Staff Report
1. Resolution
2. CIP 295 - Notice of Completion
3 4.5 Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Contract for Professional Services Agreement for On-Call Materials Testing Services to BSK Associates for Fiscal Years (FY) 2024/25 and 2025/26 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report
1. BSK Associates 2024 Proposal
2. Resolution
4.6 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Bellecci and Associates to Provide Design Services for Capital Improvement Project Number 302 - East Cypress Road Widening (Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road) Project (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
Staff Report
1. Resolution
2. Bellecci & Associates Proposal
4.7 Adopt a Resolution Adopting the 2024 Engineering Standard Plans and Details for the City of Oakley (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Staff Report
1. 2024 Engineering Standard Details
2. Resolution
5.PUBLIC HEARINGS
6.REGULAR CALENDAR
6.1 Waive the First Reading and Introduce an Ordinance Adding Oakley Municipal Code Section 9.1.1230(d) to Address Outdoor and Indoor Marijuana Cultivation Exceeding Six Plants as Separate Offense (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk/Paralegal) Staff Report
1. Proposed Ordinance
6.2 Waive the First Reading and Introduce an Ordinance Adding Oakley Municipal Code Section 4.41.120 to Include Administrative Hearing Requirements Related to Unlicensed Commercial Cannabis Activity (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk/Paralegal)
Staff Report
1. Proposed Ordinance
7.REPORTS
4 7.1 CITY MANAGER
(a) City Manager
(b) Report from the Oaks Apartments
The Oaks City Update
7.2 OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a) Reports from Council Liaisons to Regional Committees, Commissions and Boards AND Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency
(b) Requests for Future Agendas
8.WORK SESSION
8.1 Exploring Funding Options for Local Startups and Small Businesses (Harumi Murata, Economic Development Analyst)
Staff Report
9.CLOSED SESSIONS
9.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency designated representatives: Mayor Williams, Vice Mayor Shaw, City Attorney Cole
Unrepresented employee: City Manager
9.2 CITY ATTORNEY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957
10.ADJOURN
5 Minutes of the Regular Joint Meeting of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority held May 14, 2024
1) OPENING MATTERS
1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority
Mayor Anissa Williams called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California. Vice Mayor Shannon Shaw and Councilmembers Dr. George Fuller, Hugh Henderson and Aaron Meadows were also present.
1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
Oakley Leadership Academy graduate Kerry Harvey led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
1.3 Award of Certificates for the Oakley Leadership Academy City Manager Joshua McMurray provided information regarding the Academy and mentioned there were 16 participants.
Mayor Williams presented certificates to graduates Andrea Everage, Arnoldo Diaz, Cathy Jurkiewicz, Hiren Patel, Jeanne Krieg, Kerry Harvey, Makayla Mattos, Martha Berry, Matthew Berry, Michael Krieg, Tejah Dillon, and Timothy Trickel. Academy graduates Joshua Smith, Lisa Cano-Loomis, Penelope Tackitt, and Wesley Morgan were not present but were recognized.
1.4 Presentation of Proclamations
1. Building Safety Month (Ken Strelo, Community Development Director)
2. National Police Week (Paul Beard, Police Chief
3. National Public Works Week (Kevin Rohani, Public Works Director/City Engineer) Mayor Williams presented the Building Safety Month proclamation to Ken Strelo, Community Development Director.
Mayor Williams presented the National Police Week proclamation to Paul Beard, Chief of Police.
Chief Beard mentioned tomorrow is Police Memorial Day for our nation and Lieutenant Roberts is in Washington D.C. along with his son who is also in law enforcement for an annual 6 commemorative event for peace officers. Chief Beard mentioned he has authorized the Flag of the United States be flown at half-staff tomorrow and for black bands to be worn across Officer’s badges representing the 3 fallen officers from the Bay Area.
Mayor Williams presented the National Public Works Week proclamation to Kevin Rohani, Public Works Director/City Engineer.
Mr. Rohani mentioned City staff will host an open house next Thursday, May 23, 9am-12pm, in the Civic Center parking lot, with over 200 elementary school students expected to attend. He invited the Council to join.
2) PUBLIC COMMENTS
Chris Palomo, Field Representative for Local 152 Carpenters Union, commented that there is exploitation of workers by developers, unrepresented workers denied livable wages, contractors failing to provide health care, and misclassification of workers. He urged the Council to enact and enforce labor standards and the value hands that build brick and mortar buildings.
Joey Ogo with Be Exceptional commented that he provides skateboarding classes with Parks & Recreation. He requested improvements to Creekside Skate Park. He explained that the ground is rough and unfriendly, skaters want to go to Antioch and Brentwood because they have better skate parks, and the parking lot at Creekside Park is a better surface to skate on than the actual skate park. He requested the Council consider repaving the skate park at Creekside Park.
Mayor Williams requested staff provide a future update on any upcoming improvements.
Alex Menjivar mentioned he is a new resident of Oakley and comes from New York and Sacramento that have the best skateparks. He inquired what can he do for his city. He mentioned he helps Joey at Creekside with the skate program and the surface is like a cheese grater. He shared that he recently started working for a skateboard company and skateboarding is in the Olympics. He mentioned the parking lot has better ground than the actual skatepark and it is embarrassing. He mentioned the kids want to skate in the parking lot, but they can’t because of liability. He added that on Instagram, they see the ground being fixed at the splash site at Creekside Park, but no improvements for the skate park.
Lorena Campos commented that there is a need for repaving the skate park and she will take the request to Parks & Recreation. She explained the skate park is in extremely poor condition, the parking lot is preferred over the skate park because the pavement is cracked and uneven, deterring it from use. She mentioned that the skate park is for family use, but it compromises safety and deters use. She requested the City Council consider her request to re-pave the skate park.
Bud Chaddock commented that Danny Harris from CSDA came out to assess the salmon situation and has experience with the restoration of Monterey Bay and other areas; he confirmed the San Joaquin is vital for all California salmon and that there is great impact to income and jobs related to the salmon, and it is necessary to preserve it. He mentioned they can’t keep counting on the Mokelumne, the only river that had a good return. He mentioned that it is necessary to protect Marsh Creek, a great resource, to guard it against salmon poaching, and we need to do more. He mentioned keeping the water quality clean is important. He mentioned new parks are being discussed but they have a valuable resource already and he doesn’t want to see it become like the buffalo disappearance and later laws were enacted. He added that it takes the Federal, State and local governments to work together. 7 Marilyn Tiernan commented that to emphasize what Bud was talking about, she has heard that there are homeless persons defecating in waterways and are in the field closer to Laurel. She mentioned the people near the Cypress bridge are defecating, and a number of other things.
She mentioned she doesn’t know who is responsible for it or if have they have suggestions, who to call.
Mayor Williams inquired if Cypress bridge is Antioch’s jurisdiction.
Mr. McMurray confirmed it is not.
Mayor Williams mentioned Chief Beard will speak with Ms. Tiernan. 3) COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS
Dr. Fuller inquired if the persons making public comment were talking about Creekside Park and Mayor Williams confirmed they were.
Dr. Fuller apologized for being behind on messages and getting back to Bud. He mentioned the San Joaquin starts at Mammouth Lakes and is a vital part to California. He mentioned he has asked Mr. McMurray and others to open up a Library Commission Ad Hoc Committee. He mentioned the Affordable Housing Ad-Hoc Advisory Committee meetings were public, the agenda was posted and published, and there were minutes. He requested that ad-hoc committee meetings be public if they plan to change policies. He added that the library is very important.
Councilmember Meadows commented that regarding the social media policy, he is supportive of the First Amendment and people should have the right to say what they want, including Councilmembers, but with that comes responsibility.
In reference to comments made by Dr. Fuller on Next Door a few days ago. Councilmember Meadows mentioned that the park is Enrico Cinquini Park, not Edward Cinquini. He shared that Mr. Cinquini did a lot for the Oakley community, he was a friend and mentor, he served on the Oakley-Knightsen Fire Board, he was part of OMAC from day 1 until June 30, 1999 (Councilmember Meadows served March 93’ until the end), he served in WWII in the Marine Corp., and he (Dr. Fuller) should get his (Enrico Cinquini) name right as he did a lot for Oakley.
Regarding comments made by Dr. Fuller about moving money around, Councilmember Meadows mentioned he did not introduce a resolution for Enrico Cinquini Park; it is at northeast end of Carpenter and Rose, and happened before the City’s incorporation, not at his doing.
Regarding comments made by Dr. Fuller regarding E. Cypress Road being defunded, Councilmember Meadows mentioned there is an item tonight to add money to E. Cypress Road.
He shared that all 5 of the Councilmembers have made a commitment to make improvements to E. Cypress Road.
Regarding comments made by Dr. Fuller regarding McDonald’s and Quick Quack, Councilmember Meadows shared that he voted for both. He explained that he believes in the Constitution and property rights; both developers and homeowners have rights. He mentioned all Councilmembers had the same information that they would have been sued and likely would have lost millions of dollars, and that money would not be available to go to parks or E. Cypress Road.
8 Regarding comments made by Dr. Fuller regarding Rotary, Councilmember Meadows mentioned that three Councilmembers (including him) and the City Manager are members. He shared that last weekend, Rotary had its 5th Anniversary Gala to raise money for projects for Oakley, members have painted maps on all elementary schools, eight Freedom High School Seniors will receive $1k scholarships, and they are raising money for the food and toy distribution at Christmas. He commented that he doesn’t appreciate having it singled out continually. He mentioned that facts matter.
4) CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Williams announced that item 4.14 will be continued to the next meeting.
Dr. Fuller pulled items 4.5, 4.8, 4.10, 4.11, 4.12, and 4.13.
Mayor Williams pulled item 4.4.
It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Councilmember Henderson to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) Item 4.4
Councilmember Williams commented that the cost has increased a great amount and with issues last year with sick and dying goats, she hopes with this increase that kids don’t see that happening while walking to school. She inquired if there is a plan in place.
Public Works Director/City Engineer Kevin Rohani mentioned the incident she referred to happened two years ago and has already been addressed with the shepherd. He explained that the volume of grazing this year is why there is a cost increase. He mentioned staff try to do some of the work with machinery and some with goats because it is impossible to reach some drain areas with equipment. He also mentioned that sometimes with a wet winter, they have to bring goats twice per year. He added that they need to monitor vegetation, goats are popular and environmentally friendly, and they put measures in place to keep costs down.
Mayor Williams recalled Brian Oftedal mentioning in one of his fire updates that grazing goats are the most efficient way to prevent wildfires.
It was moved by Mayor Williams and seconded by Councilmember Meadows to adopt the resolution. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)
Item 4.5
Dr. Fuller inquired why City employees cannot be trained to do the work of Strike Doors.
Public Works Director/City Engineer Kevin Rohani explained that the work Strike Doors performs is specialized, for example for electric gates and to do everything that Strike Doors does would require one person dedicated to all facilities in town, so they contract for more specialized work.
Dr. Fuller inquired why they can’t train staff and if the City has electricians.
Mr. Rohani explained that there are no electricians; they have maintenance workers. 9 Dr. Fuller mentioned he has a problem with it and explained that since the 1990s, there has been contracting out work; he believes our employees can be trained; there are too many contracts out which is a detriment to our employees; the first choice should be to go through them and if there is no other way, then contract.
It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Vice Mayor Shaw to adopt the resolution. AYES: Henderson, Meadows, Shaw, Williams. NOES: Fuller. (4-1) Item 4.8
Public Works Director/City Engineer Kevin Rohani mentioned that the 2024 Oakley Regional Park Master Plan started developing last year with community meetings and outreach, and there have been two rounds of massive planning since 2016 to present. He shared a key feature is its’ uniqueness with features such as camping, fishing, and water recreation, to be a destination point with some traditional park components to draw visitors to Oakley. He shared that E. Cypress residents are eagerly anticipating this park once they get funding and can build it.
Bud Chaddock commented that the park is based on getting grant funds. He mentioned that there are bad enough problems now with roads. He commented on the fishing; that they are considering putting something else in without fixing what is in. He inquired who is going to clean up campgrounds when they have people under Cypress bridge. He suggested developers will have to start putting in more money. He mentioned he likes the idea of a park and Brannan Island is similar and it is having problems at times with funding. He mentioned the roads are choked already and they spent $400k on a fish ladder on Marsh Creek that is useless; the fish can’t get up it because there is not enough water because we keep taking more. He suggested fixing what we have and having the money upfront.
Dr. Fuller mentioned years ago it was called the regional park, then it went to the 55-acre park, and then back to the regional park. He inquired why there have been name changes.
Mr. Rohani explained it is all the same, it is a 55-acre park, it does not have an official name, and it is called the regional park right now as a default name. He explained that once it is funded and built, they will need to create a name.
Dr. Fuller inquired if the Council is approving the item.
Mr. Rohani confirmed that is correct. He mentioned maybe two years ago, after creating the Oakley Strategic Plan, the Council made a collective decision to have a master plan, so they have already walked down this path and the entire Council was involved in the process, and the last public meeting, they had the general support of the Council. He explained that they can use this approval of the plan for an assortment of grant funding and funding opportunities. He mentioned that this will not be built overnight but rather in phases because of its mass scale, and there is a lot of synergy at this site, but they need a plan to use; it is similar to the library plan, this is a vision.
Dr. Fuller moved approval.
Vice Mayor Shaw commented she is not a fan of the item being on Consent. She mentioned E.
Cypress Road will be done before this park and she sends grant information to staff every time she gets it. She mentioned the phases can be adjusted, the whole site is not safe, and if approved, how can they get the site safe-maybe they can start seeing trails linked or something. 10 She shared that she is not a 100% fan of overnight camping. She inquired if someone would manage it, so staff is not burdened and there are not homeless utilizing it.
City Manager Joshua McMurray explained that the phasing will be dictated by funding available; they have to have a plan to apply for funding. He mentioned Marsh Creek is sensitive to Mr.
Chaddock as there are a lot of sensitive issues to many residents, but they have to focus on conducting City business for the good of the entire city and need a plan in place. He mentioned the Council took courageous steps to take a step forward, to build a base for water sports, recreation, and fishing; they need a site they can have control of, there are many aspects of the plan to appeal to the community, and they can enter into a public-private partnership with someone that is licensed to manage the campground and boat launch. In response to Dr.
Fuller’s comment, yes, they can approve the plan, but more approvals will be needed, such as environmental, design, etc.
Vice Mayor Shaw mentioned she is excited about the water aspect, the unique-skatepark and pump, and she is happy to see it going in this direction. She is happy with the design.
Mayor Williams commented that she is not happy it is on consent; she would have liked to see a final work session. She mentioned the skatepark and pump track she is happy about but surprised to see in the plan, and the final figure is daunting; it seems unattainable and the City doesn’t have resources for multi-year construction as costs go up every year and licensing may recoup some of those costs. She mentioned she loves the plan and idea and she originally brought the item forward; however, she doesn’t want this to also not happen; she wants confidence.
Mr. McMurray mentioned that he can’t say with 100% confidence that it will happen, but they have a great team to find funding; licensing, funding and public-private partnerships, things that they can explore that they haven’t yet; they don’t know what can get until have a plan; they have been unsuccessful on previous 2 plans; this type of project is appealing to grants; they can engage the State for support; and if the Council adopts it; staff will leave no stone unturned.
It was moved by Dr. Fuller and seconded by Vice Mayor Shaw to adopt the resolution. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)
Item 4.10
Dr. Fuller inquired why employees can’t be trained for tree lighting maintenance.
Public Works Director/City Engineer Kevin Rohani responded that this is the best cost, and the company provides service to other cities. He mentioned they take care of trees along Main Street to re-string trees when vandalized. He also mentioned that the staff does some and the company does some. He explained that in much larger cities that have hundreds of employees it may be different, but Oakley is never going to be that type of city; it uses in-house resources and a contractor.
Dr. Fuller commented that he is aware of “lean and mean”, the first thing he wanted to disappear when he came on the Council. He shared it always bothered him to assume public workers are goofing off, and he is not convinced employees couldn't be trained. He shared he was impressed when winter holiday decorations went up and the Park Ranger was up on the ladder helping. He mentioned the staff are dedicated workers, very much involved, and he would like to expand on that.
11 Mr. Rohani mentioned if anyone thinks Public Works staff are goofing off, he invites them to come visit and see; he doesn't want that persona to be associated with Oakley Public Works.
He mentioned the $20k pricing; they will do some and rearrange schedules, but with the amount of work, they need to contract support.
Mayor Williams commented that this item is unlike the other item in that the City does not have specialized labor. She inquired if there are not enough bodies here.
Mr. Rohani explained that it is a volume issue; if they train people for specialized work, there are still general duties to be done from changing a light bulb to machines not working. He mentioned that this company comes in twice per year, and they re-string lights. He shared that this past week they repaved Main Street and had to re-string lights because tree limbs were broken. He mentioned it takes time from other work and this is most efficient way so they can take care of other services.
It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Councilmember Henderson to adopt the resolution. AYES: Henderson, Meadows, Shaw, Williams. NOES: Fuller. (4-1) Items 4.11 and 4.12
Dr. Fuller mentioned this does not show any affordable units. He inquired upon actual completion if the design will contain 20%.
City Manager Joshua McMurray explained that on both items, 4.11 and 4.12, no affordable units will be constructed; however, there are 6 builder remedy applications that will eventually provide affordable housing by the time the entire Summer Lake subdivision is completed.
Mayor Williams mentioned the history of entitlements goes back 15+ years. She inquired if staff anticipates much building done before E. Cypress Road is completed.
Public Works Director/City Engineer Kevin Rohani mentioned there are currently 820 homes proposed; Village 1 and 2 proposed to be approved tonight, will take a number of years. He mentioned E. Cypress Road will be completed; this is the first phase of development and it will take a number of years.
It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Dr. Fuller to adopt the resolutions for items 4.11 and 4.12. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) Item 4.13
Dr. Fuller thanked Mr. Gorman for his report, mentioning he was highly impressed, and it was easy to follow.
Mayor Williams requested staff include real numbers behind general statements to show the City is doing it, as data matters.
It was moved by Dr. Fuller and seconded by Councilmember Meadows to accept the report.
Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)
12 4.1 Approve Minutes from the Regular Joint City Council/City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency and Special Public Financing Authority Meeting held April 23, 2024 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)
4.2 Accept Report Out of Closed Session Memo (Derek Cole, City Attorney)
4.3 Waive the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 7-24 Amending Section
2.1.010 of the Oakley Municipal Code Concerning the Use of Social Media by Members of the City Council (Derek Cole, City Attorney)
4.4 Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Contract to Capra Environmental Services Corporation for On-Call Weed and Brush Maintenance Grazing Services for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024/25 and 2025/26 and approving Contract Amendment No. 1 for FY 2023/24 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
4.5 Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Contract with Strike Doors, LLC for On-Call Electrical Gate and Door Maintenance Services and Repair for City facilities for FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
4.6 City of Oakley Investment Report (3rd Quarter FY 2023/24) (Jeri Tejeda, Administrative Services Director)
4.7 City of Oakley as Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency Quarterly Investment Report (3rd Quarter FY 2023/24) (Jeri Tejeda, Administrative Services Director)
4.8 Adopt a Resolution Approving the 2024 Oakley Regional Park Master Plan, Capital Improvement Program Project No. 176 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer
4.9 Adopting Two Resolutions Initiating the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 proceedings; initiating the process and declaring the intention to levy and collect assessments, and setting June 11, 2024, as the date for the Public Hearing (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
4.10 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement for Downtown Tree Lighting Maintenance Services with Pacific Display, Inc. for the City of Oakley for Fiscal Years (FY) 2024/25 and 2025/26 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
4.11 Adopt Two Resolutions Approving a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and a Final Map for Summer Lake North (Phase 1) Village 1 Subdivision 9616 located at the northeast corner of East Cypress Road and Bethel Island Road (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
4.12 Adopt Two Resolutions Approving a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Final Map for Summer Lake North (Phase 1) Village 2 Subdivision 9617 located at the northeast corner of East Cypress Road and Bethel Island Road (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
4.13 City of Oakley General Plan Annual Progress Report Calendar Year 2023 (Evan Gorman, Associate Planner)
13 4.14 (Continued from April 23, 2024) Adopt a Resolution Accepting a Grant Deed Conveying to the City of Oakley Certain Real Property Interests (portions of APN 034-090-022, located at Laurel Road and O’Hara Avenue) (Derek Cole, City Attorney)
4.15 Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Contract to Sweeping Corp of America (SCA) for Street and Parking Lot Sweeping Maintenance Services for the City of Oakley for FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
5) PUBLIC HEARINGS
5.1 Planning Area 6-H Subdivision 9636 (East Cypress Corridor Specific Plan) Tentative Map (TM 01-23)-Request for approval of a Vesting Tentative Map to subdivide 16.5 acres into 89 single family residential lots. APNs 032-082-010 and 032-082-011 (Ken Strelo, Community Development Director) Community Development Director Ken Strelo provided the staff report and PowerPoint presentation.
Dr. Fuller inquired if there is affordable housing. He mentioned there are senior units but they are pricey and constricted, so he is curious how they are going to make their affordable housing unit needs within that unit as presented.
Mr. Strelo explained that it is not proposed for affordability; the Development Agreement gave an option up to 196 affordable units; this is different, and he believes the homes will be single family market rate as staff has not received a proposal for a density increase or affordability.
Dr. Fuller inquired if it can be added as a requirement is the Council approves it.
Mr. Strelo suggested the Council hear from the applicant first as the Council can require it, but the applicant would have to agree to it.
Councilmember Meadows mentioned there is no affordable housing, but he would expect a lower price point based on the lot size.
Owen Poole, representative for the applicant, mentioned on the previous map, the project had 4 pieces: the levee, roadway to south, Bethel Island Road, and the envelope in the middle. He mentioned to acquire it, they had to complete the entire perimeter around the levee and the response from Bethel Island Road to Summer Lake, in working with Planning and Public Works, was to align the edge so when Summer Lake North is finished, they have alignment to complete the levee. He mentioned they lost a lot of units because of environmental constraints to the west and they built a $4.5 million preserve that has been accepted and approved by HCP and is functioning; they voluntarily gave up units to the environment. He mentioned that affordable housing was never part of the deal. He shared that the City was created because it was tired of being the County’s dumping ground for affordable housing. He explained that this project, how do it to develop east side of road for Oakley; if there had been an affordable project, this would not happen as it would not pencil. He mentioned they are trying to come up with a variety of housing types and sizing and his son lives in Oakley, so he is sensitive that housing is expensive. He mentioned this project is trying to capture units lost and responding to the East Cypress Corridor alignment with Bethel Island Road and Sandmound. 14 Dr. Fuller mentioned they built the preserve to meet environmental requirements and forfeited 54 units. He expressed that his concern is that there is no affordable housing, and they have an obligation to meet requirements. He mentioned he understands about connecting the levee and hill.
Mr. Poole mentioned the road will elevate part of the levee.
Dr. Fuller commented that he can accept that units forfeited as an exchange for affordable housing to recoup their investment; even though wasn’t discussed before and now it is; based on that he can accept it along with what was done for the preserve.
Councilmember Meadows commented that he doesn’t like the layout; it is the same as Oakley Road and he didn’t like that. He mentioned he is likely to vote for it but requested Mr. Poole not bring back layouts like this.
Mayor Williams inquired about the anticipated selling price.
Mr. Poole mentioned he doesn’t know but hopefully it will be as affordable as possible.
Mayor Williams mentioned there are garages. She inquired if there is extra parking for visitors, which Mr. Poole confirmed there will be.
Mayor Williams opened the public hearing and called for public comments. There being no public comments, she closed the public hearing.
Dr. Fuller inquired if the Council approves the tentative map if it is required to accept and keep the same map or if another map can be brought forward.
Mr. Strelo explained that is the tentative map is approved by the Council, the entitlement is good as long as the applicant meets all conditions of approval before filing the final map; once the final map comes forward, it should be approved by the Council and recorded. He mentioned what still will come forward is the design/architectural that will be reviewed by the Planning Commission.
Dr. Fuller shared that he passed by a project similar to this and he agrees with Councilmember Meadows; it makes him shudder, it looks like military housing, corroded and unpleasant. He mentioned if modifications could be made, it would be nice to see.
In response to Mayor Williams’ inquiry about selling price, Councilmember Meadows guessed on a price point; if built today, it would be in the high 600s-low 700s.
Mayor Williams inquired if the likelihood of anything being built before E. Cypress Road is built is slim.
Mr. Strelo confirmed that is correct; the homes cannot be occupied until the levee is built.
Mayor Williams expressed that she hates the price point; it is more than average that residents can afford, but she appreciates the variety of housing. She shared that she is not a fan of more single-family homes; these are tiny homes, and the price point is crazy.
Councilmember Meadows mentioned it is $90k in fees just to pull a permit before they start to build.
15 It was moved by Councilmember Henderson and seconded by Councilmember Meadows (he expressed he doesn’t like the layout). Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) Mayor Williams called for a break at 8:24 p.m. The Council reconvened approximately 10 minutes later.
6) REGULAR CALENDAR
6.1 Adopt a Resolution to re-allocate or un-fund certain capital improvement projects for fiscal year 2023-2024 (Jeri Tejeda, Administrative Services Director) City Manager Joshua McMurray took a moment to address what he indicated was misinformation on Dr. Fuller’s social media accounts. He mentioned staff identified there was an issue with the CIP program during past review at mid-year and was very transparent about it, he is committed to being transparent, and it was mentioned that mid-year review statements showed that CIP may need to be placed on hold, there were potential funding deficits and potential for negative fund balance, specifically with the traffic impact fee and park impact fee.
He mentioned they expressed that they must wait until May to confirm if they should need to unfund projects during that time, and is what staff is doing tonight. He mentioned they don’t operate in perfection, but in reality. He provided specific numbers of homes budgeted versus permits pulled in fiscal years 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 with both fiscal years having shortages.
He mentioned the economy has not improved. He mentioned he communicated through email with Dr. Fuller that the City cannot mix park impact funds with road funds. He explained that the Fund 204 park impact fee has been adjusted lower and there are rising costs for the Enrico Cinquini Park; during fiscal year 2022/2023, they allocated $3.5 mil for the project. He mentioned park impact fees come from developers. In regard to Fund 202, CIP 268,269, and 270, were unfunded to balance the fund to be responsible; an adjustment is being made for lower than expected revenue. He mentioned they are not unfunding any work on E. Cypress as mentioned in Dr. Fuller’s social media post. Mr. McMurray explained that his job is to ensure the project is delivered to the community as promised, staff is exercising transparency and attempting to correct deficiencies in funds, and staff is asking the Council to unfund projects in the most responsible way possible.
Administrative Service Director Jeri Tejeda presented the staff report.
Dr. Fuller inquired if ARPA funds need to go to parks.
Mr. McMurray responded that is exactly what is happening which he already provided in an email and on the record now.
Dr. Fuller mentioned how many times he has pleaded to get something done to Creekside and now there are people coming to the meeting to address it; the east side of Main is not getting any money and the area is neglected. He mentioned the streets running north of Delta Road are private and dirt roads, also along Main Street some are padlock/gated. He mentioned if APRA fees can go to parks, $1-$2 million should go to Creekside Park.
Mr. McMurray commented that staff is preparing to recommend the budget and Council can provide direction if it wishes to move money to Creekside. 16 Dr. Fuller mentioned how many times he has pleaded, and he hasn’t had any contact with the individuals that showed up to ask for improvements to Creekside Park. He mentioned it is clear they can move $1, 2, 3 million into Creekside Park and discussed CIP 302.
Mr. McMurray mentioned they have already funded ARPA funds; they don’t need to fund it twice; the design will move forward.
Dr. Fuller inquired what amount is allocated to design.
Ms. Tejeda mentioned it will come before Council during the next meeting; it is around $300k.
Dr. Fuller mentioned the City has looked for funding for the Recreation Center and park areas, but E. Cypress Road he campaigned on when there was a fire and it was a madhouse; he is hearing that is not being changed but he has heard that over and over again; it’s not misstated; it is staff’s writing that is misleading, smoke and mirrors. He inquired why they can’t take $1 million and move it from Cinquini Park to the Library as it involves expanding Civic Center Park.
Mr. McMurray explained that there are multiple impact fees when issuing a building permit: park, impact and public facility impact fees; they have budgeted public facility impact fees for the library and cannot use the park fees for the library.
Dr. Fuller inquired if he foresaw this.
Mr. McMurray explained that he just read specific verbatim statements that they did foresee this, the cost of park construction, over $1 million per acre; the cost of construction is very expensive now.
Dr. Fuller mentioned it is $5 million now and another $1 million soon, then it will be $6 million in the end.
Mr. McMurray explained that the City doesn’t typically develop parks from ground up; this project was approved by the County; the park fee the County was going to pay the City was $2.1 million and they can’t construct at that price, but residents expect the park.
Dr. Fuller inquired why they didn’t unfund the parking lot to use for the park.
Mr. McMurray mentioned that decision was made by the City Council and project expense is increasing; there is no way to deliver it to the community for less than what is proposed unless it will be 4.5 acres of turf.
Dr. Fuller inquired why the City hasn’t done anything for Creekside Park.
Mr. McMurray mentioned staff has not received any direction from the Council to do anything with Creekside Park.
Mayor Williams inquired if there could ever be a situation where the Council can use park funds for a parking lot.
Mr. McMurray explained that the impact fees are separate buckets and the Council would have to adopt resolutions for roadway improvements to include parking lots.
Mayor Williams inquired about the accounting on item 302. 17 Ms. Tejeda mentioned it is to show previously funded and money remaining.
Mayor Williams inquired if they are not lessening the amount.
Ms. Tejeda explained that $380k is set aside for design and it had been allocated in the traffic impact fund and in the ARPA fund, and they are now reducing it by $380k, but the intent is not to have double the amount. She mentioned it is to design phase 3 of E. Cypress Road.
Mayor Williams inquired if E. Cypress Road is not being stalled which Ms. Tejeda confirmed is correct.
Vice Mayor Shaw mentioned she went through the whole staff report and had the same general consensus what they are getting at. She mentioned the attachments to staff reports have details so sometimes it takes further digging.
Councilmember Meadows inquired if they move traffic impact fees to park funds, if payers of traffic impact fees would be able to request a refund of traffic impact fees.
Mr. McMurray mentioned that would be an issue as well as an audit as they are mixing buckets.
City Attorney Derek Cole mentioned the City would be sued and would lose.
Ms. Tejeda mentioned the AB 1600 report happens at the same time as the audit and they have to report on impact fees-- how they are spending and when they anticipate spending. She mentioned the intent is to collect and spend within every 5 years.
Mayor Williams commented that CIP 268/269 are necessary. She inquired if the CIP remaining for $200k is going to get the intersection improved.
Mr. McMurray mentioned it is not even close. He explained that the right-of-way needs to be acquired and there is design and construction. He mentioned he does not think that the design could even happen right now for $100k.
Mayor Williams inquired with right-of-way needing to be acquired on Laurel Road and E.
Cypress if staff thinks the City would have a project within 5 years.
Mr. McMurray mentioned he highly doubts it. He explained that the main way the City gets public infrastructure is through development and the City constructing small sections.
Dr. Fuller mentioned item 310 provides gas tax of $200k for widening, then general capital projects for $400k. He inquired if it can’t go to Delta and Main.
Mr. McMurray explained that traffic impact fee money can be used on roadways, however the Council can decide if it wants to provide different direction. He mentioned staff have been given direction to focus on E. Cypress Road and Laurel Road; they just want to make sure the fund balance balances.
Dr. Fuller mentioned he really didn’t mean it is going to be unfunded; staff found money over here to get it done; staff said it is being unfunded and now defensively are saying they didn’t and it wasn’t in the report.
Councilmember Henderson requested clarification if they unfund the Delta Road and Main project, it is not going away, they are just moving it until they can do another project. 18 Mr. McMurray mentioned this is correct and intersections.
Councilmember Henderson mentioned they are including with it needing land and another jurisdiction to deal with when it comes to design.
Mayor Williams mentioned she wants to make sure that everyone understands that money is allocated and cannot be used and they can’t accuse people of misappropriating money if they don’t understand; it doesn’t mean they took it from something else to unfund it. She mentioned because we [the Council] may not understand when reading; if they say money is going to this, they have a duty to put it to that. She mentioned after the entire Council has been fighting to have funding go to E Cypress, to take it from that to give to Brownstone would be unjust as direction has already been given to staff and people are expecting it. She mentioned to accuse staff…
Dr. Fuller inquired who accused staff of misappropriated funds and mentioned Mayor Williams’ double talk is something.
Mayor Williams mentioned she must have misunderstood when Dr. Fuller mentioned that all of a sudden staff will find $500k; that is how she heard it. She mentioned staff is not moving money around to fund a pet project or something else.
There were no public comments.
It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Vice Mayor Shaw to adopt the resolution.
Dr. Fuller mentioned the southeast side of town is dangerous, it is ignored over and over again because of the general election, the southeast side or east of Main is po’ folk/BIPOC, the City is not worried about injuries with Brownstone, and the intersections are dangerous. He mentioned the bottom line is that there is $5 million for that project and they are moving money; they can have a nice park with $4 million but got a Recreation Center first.
Mr. Cole mentioned they are getting way off topic, this topic was not presented, and the Council controls the creation of CIPs and funding.
Mayor Williams called the question.
AYES: Henderson, Meadows, Shaw, Williams. NOES: Fuller. (4-1) 7) REPORTS
7.1 CITY MANAGER
(a) City Manager
(b) Business License Update
Mr. McMurray reported on the County’s Emergency Services Local Hazardous Mitigation Plan, the Military Equipment meeting to be held May 16 at 6pm in the Chambers, and AB 1657 (Mayor Williams inquired at the last meeting if RHNA numbers could shift and in his review they cannot and in Townsend’s review there is no language in the bill that numbers move in any way). He addressed comments Dr. Fuller made about him in Rotary. He explained that he 19 joined Rotary in 2021, it meets his moral values, he has been a member for over 2 years, he has dedicated his entire career to public service, he supports their mission, and he proudly wears its pin. He mentioned the business license update has been provided in the agenda packet.
7.2 OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR
AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a) Reports from Council Liaisons to Regional Committees, Commissions and Boards AND Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency
Councilmember Henderson reported he attended the City’s birthday party on May 4th, on May 7th he attended the Ironhouse Sanitary District Board meeting, and on May 8, he attended Supervisor Burgis’ mixer in Brentwood.
Vice Mayor Shaw reported she attended Tri-Delta meeting on the 24th, the 25th she attended a tour regarding the Library with Assemblymember Wilson and later that night she attended a East Bay CalCities meeting and Attorney General Rob Bonta spoke, and she attended a Library County Foundation meeting via Zoom. She also reported that she spoke at the Liberty Union High School District (LUHSD) Fentanyl Awareness event, on 5/1 she attended a sub-committee meeting for the Library regarding the donor wall design and brochure, she attended Oakley’s 25th birthday kick off, Tri-Delta’s shredding event, the Chamber’s mega mixer put on by Diane Burgis, and Rotary. She mentioned she has received some calls from The Oaks residents, some complaints, compliments, and advice.
Dr. Fuller reported he attended Supervisor Burgis’ event, a stormwater runoff meeting webinar, and the East Bay Council on Leadership regarding the economic forecast.
Councilmember Meadows mentioned the TRANSPLAN meeting last week was canceled. He reported he attended the City’s birthday event, CCTA is tomorrow, and MCE Thursday.
Mayor Williams provided information regarding the Tri-Delta Board’s position on SB 1031, the paratransit program (Measure X funding) and the CalCities’ meeting featuring AG Rob Bonta’s report. She reported she attended Brentwood’s Day of Service; LUHSD Athletic Hall of Fame where Freedom High School’s 2016 football team was inducted, the Brentwood Chamber job fair, the LUHSD fentanyl awareness event, the Library sub-committee meeting, the Measure X funding meeting, and a mental Health ceremony.
(b) Requests for Future Agendas
Mayor Williams requested a Day of Service event after the City’s 25th anniversary year. It was supported by Vice Mayor Shaw.
8) WORK SESSIONS
8.1 Fiscal Year 2024/25 Budget Work Session (Jeri Tejeda, Administrative Services Director)
Administrative Services Director Jeri Tejeda presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation.
20 There was an issue with microphones. Mayor Williams called for a brief recess.
Due to meeting time constraints, Mayor Williams inquired if they could pause the item and hear items 8.2 and 8.3 prior to this discussion.
It was moved by Vice Mayor Shaw and seconded by Mayor Williams to change the order of items as mentioned. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) Items 8.2 and 8.3 were heard and then Item 8.1 was heard.
Ms. Tejeda continued her presentation.
Dr. Fuller asked if you create a public service fund, how you keep it from an outside attack, e.g., Police service fund if there is a call by the public to defund Police.
Ms. Tejeda explained that the fund it sits in doesn’t allow staff to allocate or take money away from the fund. She mentioned if the Council wants to cut the Police budget, it can happen whether the money is in the general fund or in the Police service fund. She mentioned the P-6 money is still the P-6 money; it is just sitting in a different place.
Dr. Fuller commented he likes being transparent, but if an incident similar to the George Floyd incident occurred, he is afraid the headlines would point directly to the money that needs to go.
He mentioned he is skeptical of stockpiling (IT services fund). He inquired how the City ensures that someone paying taxes now gets the entire value of that tax now rather than some or all later. He also inquired why the incremental method is used.
Ms. Tejeda explained that historical data is used when they don’t have all the data; they look at what has happened in the past and use it as a tool to prepare for the future.
Dr. Fuller mentioned it limits systemic creativity.
Ms. Tejeda mentioned historical data is not percentage based; it is used as a guideline but it is not mandatory a specific value is used; discussions happen with staff for current year budget; it is helpful for 10-year projections.
Councilmember Meadows inquired if we believe sales tax will increase 3% and if it came from HDL.
Ms. Tejeda confirmed it came from HDL and the City went slightly more conservative than the actual HDL percentage.
Councilmember Meadows expressed that it has been wrong, but hopefully it is correct. He inquired about the internal services fund, if it is standard in agencies which Ms. Tejeda confirmed it is.
Councilmember Henderson mentioned another way to describe internal services fund is capital equipment replacement and they are building it all into one fund. He mentioned other agencies budgets may have those separate but by doing it in the internal fund, you can move it across to other replacement areas.
Ms. Tejeda confirmed it is to do capital replacements and they build a plan based on how many vehicles, when they may need to be replaced and the cost of replacing them. 21 Councilmember Henderson inquired if they try to go the life cycle of the vehicle of which Ms.
Tejeda confirmed is correct.
Councilmember Henderson referred to assessed valuation, the City using 5.5% whereas the consultant used 6%. He inquired how staff calculated that into 10 years.
Ms. Tejeda explained that the 5.5% is only for 3 years; the consultants give us a 5-year plan so it is 4% for 2025, 4% for 2026, and 5.5% for 2027, 2028 and 2029, and the consultant’s estimates are between 6-6.5% during these years, and then they go back down to 4% for the rest of the years which is extremely conservative.
With the time being 10:53 p.m., it was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Vice Mayor Shaw to extend the meeting past 11 p.m. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)
Vice Mayor Shaw mentioned the internal funds, it is like a giant compound account; she likes the idea of it and going that route, as they may have years where they need funds for replacements.
Mayor Williams mentioned the internal service funds will have a shortage of funds in 2033 by $240k and this does not change that.
Ms. Tejeda explained that the expenditures are built into the department budgets which escalate by whatever they put in which is the 4% in operating budgets. She mentioned potentially if they reduced what was moved to the internal service funds year over year, which means they wouldn’t be able to replace equipment, that would change the outlook of the 10-year plan; this is included in that 10-year projection.
Mayor Williams inquired since this is General Fund money, if it could be reassessed; if something didn’t need to be replaced, the money could be moved to other places.
Ms. Tejeda explained that if they found an internal service fund that accumulated large balances not being spent, staff would bring it to Council to reassess where it should go.
Mayor Williams had a similar question regarding stormwater funds and if it could be increased or decreased depending on what is happening which Ms. Tejeda confirmed could.
Dr. Fuller requested an increase in the ADA funds so the Council can say they are behind it.
8.2 Pancho’s Market 2 - Preliminary General Plan Amendment (PA 02-23)-Work Session to discuss the merits of a potential project to amend the General Plan Land Use Designation of an approximately 0.42-acre parcel from Residential Low/Medium (RLM) to Commercial (CO) (Evan Gorman, Associate Planner) Associate Planner Evan Gorman presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation.
Mayor Williams inquired if this would have the same availability as other commercial; they currently cannot apply for grants.
Mr. Gorman mentioned he is not familiar with how this impacts grants.
City Manager Joshua McMurray mentioned the grant program can help commercial business, they not asking applicant to move toward it, but they would qualify. 22 Mayor Williams mentioned they are alone on a corner, there are not houses up against it; there is housing across the street and behind it some distance.
Mr. Gorman confirmed there is an empty section of lot behind it and residences around.
Mayor Williams inquired if the applicant wishes to expand.
Mr. Gorman mentioned that has not been disclosed to staff.
Councilmember Meadows inquired with the GPA, if they can run it through when doing other GPAs to save cost for the applicant.
Mr. McMurray mentioned the City could wrap that into GPA project it initiates but not sure that the City has anything immediate, but when it does, they can see if the timing works for the property owner.
Councilmember Meadows shared that he supports the change.
Vice Mayor Shaw mentioned that it is not often that they are asked to change from residential to commercial; it was meant to be commercial, and she would support it.
Dr. Fuller mentioned this area of the City has been neglected, the applicant has served the community and gained respect, he is happy with what has he has done and is fine with it.
Councilmember Henderson mentioned he supports it, it has been a commercial establishment for 50+years, and it needs to be commercial.
Mayor Williams mentioned she is in agreement as long as it is financially feasible; it should have always been commercial.
8.3 5050 Live Oak Avenue - Preliminary General Plan Amendment (PA 01-24)-Work Session to discuss the merits of a potential project to amend the General Plan Land Use Designation of an approximately 1.42-acre parcel from Light Industrial (LI) to Residential Low/Medium (RLM) (Evan Gorman, Associate Planner) Mr. Gorman presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation.
Councilmember Meadows inquired why the applicant is not present.
Mr. Gorman mentioned the applicant was unable to attend.
Microphones cut out at 10:18 p.m. and were brought back up.
Public Comments
Ken Ferrante commented that changing that parcel has an effect on adjacent parcels and could cause a slow creep; if they turn that into residential, other light industrial may be affected. He mentioned sounds and dust that will flow in that direction. He added that the City has a large footprint for residential growth that is already approved; it is dangerous to reduce a light industrial footprint because as the City grows, people need somewhere to operate. He mentioned he has partnered with the City for growth for many years and changing zoning is damaging to long term general planning.
23 Richard Ladeira submitted written comments and mentioned he bought property in 1983 with the help of Rico Cinquini to get light industrial; they need a buffer or it won’t work right.
Councilmember Meadows inquired if Mr. Ladeira is on north side of the school and if Mr.
Ferrante is across the street from the school (and 2 other locations).
Dr. Fuller inquired what is his relation.
Mr. Ferrante mentioned he is west of the proposed zoning change; it would affect business operations and people trying to sleep.
Mayor Williams expressed concerns about stranding an island of light industrial and doesn’t agree to take it away. She mentioned it is zoned for Antioch schools, so they are not doing residents any favors; she is not in favor.
Dr. Fuller mentioned if light industrial isn’t developed with the existence of state laws, if a person can say its vacant and start constructing; the state may come in and build it.
Mr. Gorman mentioned they didn’t assess how recent state law would affect it; it didn’t have that level of review.
Councilmember Henderson mentioned he is not in support of it; they have very few areas zoned in the City for light industrial.
Councilmember Meadows inquired if they change it and have a corner left, if someone can put light industrial on that 1 acre.
Mr. Gorman mentioned that would have to be considered in the review process.
Councilmember Meadows inquired again why the applicant is not present.
Mr. Gorman responded that the applicant told him they couldn’t make it.
Councilmember Meadows commented that it tells him they’re not that interested. He mentioned pre-2020, the parcel to the east was converted to light industrial and he understands the school is there but just because the school went in, doesn’t mean it changes uses around it; the school has to live with it. He mentioned Mr. Ferrante was affected with certain hours conditioned and the type of operation, he works between school hours for most part; other operations would be in conflict.
Mr. Ferrante mentioned he knew going into it what he was facing, he has tried to be a good neighbor, but if someone else had it he is uncertain; they are upwind, everything on Live Oak is upwind, so he focuses on a very clean site because when dust comes through, it goes to the school; he has made a choice to pave and sweep.
Councilmember Meadows commented that the residential lot to the east has had the property for a while, they got a crazy price for it, and there are factors that make it cost prohibitive, but assuming fill is needed, he inquired if it can ever be converted back to light industrial.
Mr. Gorman responded that it can through the same process.
Vice Mayor Shaw commented that with 1.42 acres, there could potentially be 7 units; it is restrictive on commercial but would not be on residential; she is not a fan. 24 Dr. Fuller commented that he is not enthused about the housing project, and he doesn’t have enough information to make a decision.
9) CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Williams announced the Closed Session item and provided date, time and location of the next regular meeting.
9.1 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.5(e)
Title: City Manager
10) ADJOURN
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 12:00 a.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Libby Vreonis
City Clerk
25 MEMORANDUM
City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US Date: May 14, 2024
To: Mayor and City Councilmembers
From: Derek P. Cole, City Attorney
CC: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
Subject: Closed Session Report-Out Memo
For Consideration at the City Council Meeting of May 28, 2024 Background and Analysis
The City Council considered the following closed session item during its regular meeting held May 14, 2024:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.5(e)
Title: City Manager
Direction was provided to staff. There was no reportable action.
Fiscal Impact
None.
Recommendation
Receive and file this report.
Attachments
None.
26 STAFF REPORT
City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: May 28, 2024
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement for Heating, Ventilation and Air-Conditioning (HVAC) Preventative Maintenance and Repair Services with Prime Mechanical Service, Inc. for Fiscal Years (FY) 2024/25 and 2025/26 Background and Analysis
The City of Oakley has limited in-house resources to be able to address all the specialized maintenance needs of the public infrastructure and facilities in the community. Outside contractors have been used to supplement City staff in performing maintenance activities.
The various types of public works maintenance activities that the City needs for outside contractor resources generally are for major street repair, large storm drainpipe repair and rehabilitation, large scale brush removal from open ditches and drainage basins, large striping projects of streets and parking lots, heating, ventilation & air conditioning service (HVAC) and security camera services for parking lots, street intersections and parks.
The City has contracted with Prime Mechanical Service, Inc. from 2020 to present, for all HVAC services of the City owned facilities and has been happy with their level of service.
Staff worked with Prime Mechanical Service, Inc. to prepare a new scope of work and proposal that accommodates the City’s needs for the upcoming fiscal year and beyond.
The award of the agreement is exempt from competitive bidding under Section 3.6.010 of the Oakley Municipal Code paragraph 8) which provides an exception for competitive bidding “For maintenance and repair of buildings and facilities.” Currently, for all such contract services above $50,000 amount, the City Council must authorize the work by simple majority per the City’s purchasing policy.
Prime Mechanical Service, Inc. has provided their statement of qualifications and continues to be the preferred contractor to help assist staff with all HVAC needs for our facilities for FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 with the option to extend the contract for an additional two years to 2028 if work is performed satisfactorily.
Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan for community health and safety by ensuring our Facilities are maintained to preserve safety for the Oakley Community.
Approved and
Forwarded to the
City Council
27 STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 2
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US Fiscal Impact
Approval of the resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute the quarterly and oncall HVAC services agreement withPrime Mechanical Service, Inc. for FY 2024/25, and FY 2025/26. The funding for this service is included in the City’s facility maintenance budget for the respective fiscal years. The Contract signing will not occur until the FY 2024/25 Budget has been adopted by Council.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the quarterly and on-call HVAC Services Agreement with Prime Mechanical Service, Inc. for FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement in an amount not to exceed $18,424.00 each for FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 quarterly maintenance services with the option to extend the Agreement through June 30, 2028, if work continues to be performed satisfactorily.
Attachments
1. Resolution
2. Prime Mechanical Service, Inc. Proposal FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 28 Resolution No. ___-24
RESOLUTION NO. ___-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY APPROVING AN AWARD OF CONTRACT WITH PRIME MECHANICAL SERVICE, INC. FOR HEATING,
VENTILATION AND AIR-CONDITIONING PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE AND
REPAIR SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT FOR FISCAL YEARS (FY) 2024/25 AND 2025/26
WHEREAS, the City of Oakley Public Works and Engineering Department frequently seeks specialized repair and maintenance services for City-owned infrastructure; and WHEREAS, Prime Mechanical Service, Inc. has performed HVAC maintenance services competently for the City since 2020; and
WHEREAS, the award of the agreement is exempt from competitive bidding under Section 3.6.010 of the Oakley Municipal Code paragraph 8) which provides an exception for competitive bidding “For maintenance and repair of buildings and facilities”.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, by the City Council of the City of Oakley that the HVAC Maintenance Services agreement with Prime Mechanical Service, Inc. for a not-to-exceed amount of $18,424.00 for each Fiscal Year 2024/25 and 2025/26 is hereby approved for quarterly maintenance services, and the City Manager is authorized to execute said agreement. The proposal is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED, if at the end of the term the services have been performed satisfactorily the City Manager has the discretion to approve an extension of the agreement to June 30, 2028, under the same terms as the original agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oakley at a meeting held on the 28th of May 2024 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
APPROVED:
_______________________
Anissa Williams, Mayor
ATTEST:
______
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 STAFF REPORT
City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: May 28, 2024
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution accepting the work associated with Capital Improvement Project Number 295 – Fiscal Year (FY) 2023/24 Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Repair and Replacement Project
Background and Analysis
The City’s adopted FY 2023/24 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget designates funding for various infrastructure repair and replacement projects. This is consistent with the City of Oakley’s Strategic Plan (Community Health & Safety) goals to improve the quality of the City’s public infrastructure and to enhance the quality of life for our residents.
The City uses this annual project to perform the repair and replacement of damaged/ uplifted sidewalks or curb and gutter throughout the City of Oakley, to eliminate trip and fall hazards, and to provide safe sidewalks for pedestrians in the community. Tree roots are a major cause of sidewalk uplifts, and this project targeted some of the worst areas in the City where the tree roots have damaged the concrete beyond any temporary repairs. The successful completion of this project is a major step forward in keeping the public sidewalks in the community in good condition and enhances the quality of life for the residents.
The City Council had approved a 50-50 concrete cost share program to help property owners with cases of damaged and uplifted sidewalks. This program has made the replacement of damaged curb, gutter and sidewalks as simplified as possible for property owners as the City is responsible for the design and management of the construction of the project. At the end of the project, the property owners pay half the actual cost of the construction for the damaged concrete along their property, instead of being responsible for the whole cost of the design and construction.
The residents who participate in the program receive a great value, and the project helps reduce the City and property owner’s exposure to liability resulting from trip and fall incidents.
Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
This item is consistent with the Strategic Plan 27+ Community Health and Safety goals.
Fiscal Impact
The contract with R&R Pacific Construction Inc. was successfully completed on time for $99,031.00, which is under the authorized budget of $100,000.
Approved and
Forwarded to the
City Council
40 STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 2
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council Adopt the Resolution accepting CIP Project No. 295 – FY 2023/24 Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Repair and Reconstruction Project as constructed by R&R Pacific Construction Inc., to be complete, and to direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion for the project with the County Recorder
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Attachment 2 – Notice of Completion
41 Resolution No. __-24 Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. __-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY ACCEPTING AS COMPLETE THE WORK PERFORMED BY R&R PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION INC. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NUMBER 295 – FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 CURB, GUTTER, & SIDEWALK REPAIR AND
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
WHEREAS, City staff, prepared plans, special provisions, and cost estimates related to CIP Project No. 295 – FY 2023/24 Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Repair and Reconstruction Project; and
WHEREAS, on March 12, 2024, by adopting Resolution Number 32-24 the City Council awarded a construction contract to R&R Pacific Construction, Inc., for the construction of CIP No. 295 – FY 2023/24 Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Repair and Reconstruction Project; and
WHEREAS, R&R Pacific Construction, Inc., has satisfied the contractual requirements necessary for the acceptance of CIP No. 295 to be deemed complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, by the City Council of the City of Oakley that CIP Project No. 295 – FY 2023/24 Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Repair and Reconstruction Project is hereby accepted as complete.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a Notice of Completion for CIP No. 295 with the County Recorder.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oakley at a meeting held on the 28th of May 2024 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
APPROVED:
_______________________
Anissa Williams, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________ _______________________
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
42 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City Clerk
City Of Oakley
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
City Of Oakley
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER’S USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Fiscal Year (FY) 2023/24 Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Repair & Replacement Project – Capital Improvement Project Number 295
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
The CITY OF OAKLEY, a political subdivision of the State of California, did, on March 12, 2024, enter into an agreement with R&R Pacific Construction Inc., for the construction of Capital Improvement Program Project Number 295 – FY 2023/24 Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Repair & Replacement Project located on various streets located within the City of Oakley limits.
The Owner’s nature of interest or estate in the property described below is in fee.
The work described in the contract documents was to furnish all material, labor, and equipment necessary to complete FY 2023/24 Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Repair & Replacement Project – CIP 295.
On May 28, 2024, said contract, as a whole was completed and the work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Oakley.
______________________________________________________________________
VERIFICATION
I have read the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed this 28th day of May 2024 at Oakley, California.
Date: ______________ By:
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk
City of Oakley, California
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE §6103 NO FEE IS REQUIRED
FOR THE RECORDATION OF THIS
DOCUMENT
43 STAFF REPORT
City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: May 28, 2024
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Professional Services Agreement for OnCall Materials Testing Services to BSK Associates for Fiscal Years (FY) 2024/25 and 2025/26
Background and Analysis
The materials testing and inspection of new infrastructure and street projects that are constructed in the community is a critical element of the long-term performance and sustainability of the new infrastructure. This task involves testing of the aggregate base, asphalt, and concrete that is used in the construction of new street infrastructure.
As the City continues to grow with the construction of new private development projects, the demand to provide material testing and inspection services continues to increase. The City of Oakley has been using geotechnical engineering consultant services for past several years to test and inspect the materials that are used by developers and contractors in the construction of new street infrastructure to ensure that all projects (Residential and Commercial) are constructed in compliance with the City engineering standards and are documented.
The on-call agreement approach gives the City the flexibility to bring in resources as needed for projects in a cost effective and efficient way. BSK Associates have performed material testing services on multiple projects over the past several years and have done so professionally while accommodating the City’s requests very promptly. BSK Associates is very familiar with the geographic location of Oakley in the far eastern region of Contra Costa County, its soil conditions, and the general construction materials that are accessible for use by contractors as reflected in the statement of qualifications by BSK Associates. Staff recommends that BSK Associates continue to provide material testing services for the City of Oakley’s construction projects.
The award of the agreement is exempt from competitive bidding under Section 3.6.010 of the Oakley Municipal Code paragraph 1) which provides an exception for competitive bidding on “Contracts involving the acquisition of professional or specialized services, such as, but not limited to, services rendered by architects, attorneys, engineers, and other specialized consultants” Currently, for all such contract services above the $50,000 amount, the City Council must authorize the work by simple majority per the City’s purchasing policy.
Approved and
Forwarded to the
City Council
44 STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 2
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan for community health and safety by ensuring Geotechnical Testing & Inspection of various projects are maintained to preserve the quality of the public infrastructure.
Fiscal Impact
Approval of the resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with BSK Associates with a not to exceed amount of $75,000 per fiscal year, through June 30, 2026, with the option to extend the agreement an additional two years through June 30, 2028, if work is performed satisfactorily. This contract will not require funding from the City’s General Fund, as it will be funded on a project-by-project basis, either by private developers or by capital projects. Contract signing will not occur until the FY 2024/2025 Budget has been adopted by the City Council.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with BSK Associates for materials testing and inspection services for FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 with the option of extending the agreement an additional two years if work is performed satisfactorily.
Attachments
1. BSK Associates Proposal
2. Resolution
45 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
FOR
ON-CALL GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES AND
MATERIALS TESTING AND SPECIAL INSPECTION SERVICES
FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26
Submitted on May 15, 2024 by:
399 Lindbergh Avenue
Livermore, CA 94551
P: (925) 315-3151
DIR #100003557
Primary Point of Contact:
Mr. Cristiano Melo, PE, GE
[email protected]
Environmental, Geotechnical, Construction Services, Analytical Testing 46 399 Lindbergh Avenue
Livermore CA 94551
P 925.315.3151
www.bskassociates.com1
Environmental, Geotechnical, Construction Services, Analytical Testing - An Employee-Owned Company May 15, 2024 BSK Proposal No. P24000412
Mr. Kevin Rohani, PE
Public Works Director/City Engineer
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
[email protected]
SUBJECT: Statement of Qualifications for Geotechnical Engineering Services and Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services – FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26 Dear Mr. Rohani:
BSK Associates (BSK) is pleased to provide our Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) to the City of Oakley (City) for on-call geotechnical engineering services and materials testing and special inspections services for FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26. BSK has a successful history of providing geotechnical engineering and materials testing and special inspections on-call services to municipal clients throughout Northern California since 1966 with a presence in the Bay Area since 1984. We have been providing services to the City since 2016 that have included geotechnical peer reviews, geotechnical engineering services, and construction inspection services via project-specific contracts and our 2020 on-call contract with the City.
Over 75 percent of our Bay Area projects belong to public agencies. Within the Bay Area, BSK currently holds on-call contracts with the Cities of Alameda, American Canyon, Belmont, Berkeley, Brentwood, Dublin, El Cerrito, Fremont, Livermore, Oakley, Pacifica, Pleasanton, San Mateo, San Ramon, San Pablo, Vallejo, and Walnut Creek as well as the Public Works Departments of Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, the Hayward Area Recreation and Park District, and Caltrans District 4.
Our Bay Area staff has extensive experience with peer reviews, emergency response to geologic hazards, street rehabilitation/resurfacing, street widening and other improvements, pedestrian/bicycle trails and bridges, storm damage repairs, public parks and recreational facilities, public buildings, installing new or replacing existing water mains and sewer lines, and improvements to water and wastewater facilities. With our extensive local experience, staffing size, and Bay Area office location at 399 Lindbergh Avenue in Livermore, BSK is confident we can continue to provide the City with excellent response time and personalized on-call services.
BSK’s Primary Point of Contact and Project Manager for this contract will continue to be Mr. Cristiano Melo, PE, GE, who is authorized to negotiate and execute a contract with the City on BSK’s behalf. Mr.
Melo has been practicing geotechnical engineering and materials testing in the Bay Area since 2000.
Our BSK team looks forward to the opportunity to continue providing services to the City for this contract.
Should you have any questions about our qualifications, do not hesitate to contact Mr. Melo. Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
BSK Associates
Omar K. Khan, PGiT Cristiano Melo, PE, GE
Project Professional II Primary Point of Contact/Project Manager 47 Statement of Qualifications for On-Call Geotechnical Engineering Services & BSK Proposal No. P24000412 Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services – FY 2024-25 & FY 2025-26 May 15, 2024 Oakley, California Page 2
Environmental, Geotechnical, Construction Services, Analytical Testing - An Employee-Owned Company SECTION 1. BSK ASSOCIATES QUALIFICATIONS
1.1 Description of BSK Associates
Founded in 1966, BSK Associates has been in business for nearly 58 years and is a 100 percent employeeowned California S-corporation that provides construction observation/materials testing/special inspection, geotechnical and environmental consulting services, and analytical laboratory services. Over the past 5 years, BSK has had a steady staff of approximately 200 employees distributed amongst offices and laboratories throughout the States of California and Washington. BSK’s Livermore (Bay Area), Rancho Cordova (Sacramento), Fresno, and Bakersfield offices also house soils and materials laboratories accredited by the AASHTO Accreditation Program. The firm includes two divisions: an Engineering Division and an Analytical Division. The table below summarizes BSK’s office locations. BSK is a registered public works contractor with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). Our DIR registration number is 1000003557.
BSK OFFICES
BSK Bakersfield (San Joaquin Valley): 700 22nd Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301 BSK Fresno (Corporate and Central Valley): 691 N. Laverne Avenue, Suite 101, Fresno, CA 93727 BSK Fresno Analytical Laboratory (National Reach): 687 N. Laverne Avenue, Fresno, CA 93727 BSK Livermore (Bay Area): 399 Lindbergh Avenue, Livermore, CA 94551 BSK Santa Clara County (South Bay Area): 2510 Seaboard Avenue, San Jose, CA 95131 BSK Tracy (San Joaquin County): 252 West Larch Road, Suite H, Tracy, CA 95304 BSK Rancho Cordova (Sacramento): 3140 Gold Camp Drive #160, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 BSK San Bernardino: 350 E. Commercial Road, Suite #110, San Bernardino, CA 92408 BSK Vancouver Analytical Laboratory (Pacific Northwest): 2517 East Evergreen Boulevard, Vancouver, WA 98661 BSK Visalia Engineering and Analytical Center: 1200 N. Plaza Drive, Visalia, CA 93291 This contract will be serviced from our Bay Area office and laboratory located at 399 Lindbergh Avenue in Livermore, California, which staffs a total of approximately 25 employees, including 3 registered engineers (2 of whom are Registered Geotechnical Engineers), 2 registered geologists/Certified Engineering Geologists, 2 engineers in training, 2 geologists in training, and 16 certified special inspectors and materials testers, among others.
1.2 Geotechnical Engineering Services
BSK’s team of geotechnical engineers, geologists, and support staff has the technical capability and prior knowledge of local soil conditions within the City’s limits to provide creative, practical, and technically sound recommendations within a reasonable budget. We are well-equipped to provide cost-effective investigations and recommendations for many types of engineering improvement projects.
Our geotechnical design and recommendations experience encompasses, but is not exclusive to the following:
Geotechnical design services
Peer review services
Emergency response to geologic hazards
Geologic/seismic hazard studies
AC and concrete pavement design
Shallow and deep foundations
Slope stability analysis
Natural or synthetic turf fields
General and specialized earthwork
Hillside grading
Site drainage
Subgrade stabilization
Liquefaction mitigation
Groundwater level monitoring
48 Statement of Qualifications for On-Call Geotechnical Engineering Services & BSK Proposal No. P24000412 Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services – FY 2024-25 & FY 2025-26 May 15, 2024 Oakley, California Page 3
Retaining walls
Concrete slabs-on-grade
Percolation testing
Construction observation/testing
1.3 Materials Testing and Inspection Services
BSK’s construction services group provides quality assurance/quality control observation, monitoring and testing of construction materials. We are knowledgeable of construction materials including aggregates, asphalt, reinforced concrete, structural steel, concrete, masonry, fireproofing, and are familiar with the associated construction processes and methods. Members of our construction services team work under the direction of Professional Engineers, and our laboratories and technical staff are accredited by a number of agencies including:
American Concrete Institute (ACI) American Welding Society (AWS) CA Department of Transportation
(Caltrans)
Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development
CA Division of the State Architect (DSA) International Code Council (ICC) (OSHPD) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers American Society for Non-Destructive Testing (ASNT) U.S. Bureau of Reclamation AASHTO Materials Reference Laboratory BSK maintains accredited materials testing laboratories in Livermore, Fresno, and Bakersfield that can perform various standard sets of tests in accordance with ASTM and California Test Methods.
SECTION 2. KEY TEAM MEMBERS
2.2 Professional Staff
BSK’s Bay Area personnel are highly experienced at providing on-call consulting services to municipalities and public agencies. Below are our key professional personnel, however, several additional staff members are available to support the contract as needed. Resumes for our key team members are available upon request.
Cristiano Melo, PE, GE – Primary Point of Contact
Mr. Cristiano Melo will continue to serve as the Primary Point of Contact and Project Manager for this contract. He will be responsible for allocating the appropriate resources of BSK’s Bay Area office and laboratory to meet the demands for all services for this contract. He will work closely with each team member and will also be responsible for the quality and delivery of projects. Mr. Melo is very familiar with on-call services with municipal clients, serving as BSK’s main point of contact for BSK’s current on-call contracts with the Cities of Alameda, Belmont, Berkeley, Brentwood, Dublin, Oakley, Pacifica, and Vallejo, Contra Costa County, the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, and the Hayward Area Recreation and Park District. He has nearly 24 years of geotechnical engineering and materials testing experience supporting projects ranging from design of shallow and deep foundations to retaining walls, geotechnical peer reviews, emergency response to geologic hazards, pavement evaluation and rehabilitation studies, earthwork, hillside grading, site drainage, subgrade stabilization, slope stability analysis, and GHAD support.
Carrie L. Foulk, PE, GE – Senior Geotechnical Engineer
Ms. Carrie Foulk will continue to assist Mr. Melo with geotechnical tasks and serve assecondary reviewer for all deliverables. Ms. is a licensed Civil and Geotechnical Engineer in the State of California and has over 24 years of geotechnical experience providing geotechnical engineering consulting for public and private 49 Statement of Qualifications for On-Call Geotechnical Engineering Services & BSK Proposal No. P24000412 Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services – FY 2024-25 & FY 2025-26 May 15, 2024 Oakley, California Page 4
sector clients, including local area government agencies. Her expertise covers many levels of project responsibility including scoping, conducting field and laboratory investigations, performing engineering analyses, preparing reports, and coordinating and providing construction services. She serves as the main point of contact for BSK’s current on-call contracts with the Cities of Pleasanton and Livermore, and Alameda County.
Michael Kibbey, EIT – Materials Testing Task Manager
Mr. Michael Kibbey will continue to serve as the materials testing task manager for this contract. Mr.
Kibbey is BSK’s Livermore CSD Group Manager and has approximately 16 years of experience providing and managing material testing and special inspection services on a multitude of projects. He will assist this team with coordination of field staff, delivery and quality control of field reports, and provide technical guidance to field staff as needed. He is extremely responsive and an excellent communicator that can be counted on to perform his duties in a thorough and professional manner while integrating our team as an extension of the City.
2.2 Certified Field Staff
Provided below is a matrix showing our certified field staff’s capabilities for our Bay Area office. Their qualifications and resumes are available upon request.
INSPECTOR
EARHMAACIRCMASPCCWISSWSSBFP
James Auser, PE X X X X X X
Matt Lagerstrom X X
David Eckhardt X X
Dennis Ness X X X X X X X X
Keven Evans X X X X X
Ken Clark X X X
Scott Orr X X X
Don Steckbar X X X X
Marvin Pohl X X X X X X
Legend: EAR = Earthwork/Soil
HMA = Hot Mix Asphalt/AC
Pavement
ACI = Concrete
Sampling/Testing
MAS = Masonry
CWI = AWS Certified Welding Inspector
SSW = Structural Steel Welding
SSB = Structural Steel Bolting
FP = Fireproofing
RC = Reinforced Concrete
PC = Pre-stressed Concrete
SECTION 3. RECENT CITY OF OAKLEY PROJECTS
BSK has been providing services to the City since 2016 for various projects. Below is a list of recent projects that BSK has worked on for the City in the past 3 years:
Geotechnical peer review services for numerous residential development, commercial, public facilities, and levee projects.
Geological and geotechnical site reconnaissance of levees along Cypress Grove, Emerson Ranch, and Delaney Park subdivisions.
50 Statement of Qualifications for On-Call Geotechnical Engineering Services & BSK Proposal No. P24000412 Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services – FY 2024-25 & FY 2025-26 May 15, 2024 Oakley, California Page 5
Construction inspection services for downtown parking lot project. Construction inspection services for the downtown train platform station and parking lot project. Construction inspection services for the police station parking lot. Construction inspection services for FY20-21 street and surface repair.
SECTION 4. SCHEDULE OF FEES
The following three pages include our proposed Schedule of Fees. The schedule includes our job titles with hourly rates, test and equipment fees, other fees, and markup for subconsultants/subcontractors, vendors, and expenses. The rates noted in the schedule are subject to an annual increase of 3% or the Consumer Price Index of the San Francisco Bay Area, whichever is greater, effective July 1 of each year following the initiation of a services agreement with the City. 51 BSK Associates - Schedule of Fees - 07/01/2024 to 06/30/2025 (City of Oakley) Principal $ 285.00 Administrative Assistant / Clerical $ 100.00 Senior Professional $ 250.00 Seismic GIS $ 220.00
Project Professional II $ 235.00 GIS Specialist $ 190.00 Project Professional I $ 200.00 Information Specialist II $ 180.00 Staff Professional II $ 175.00 Information Specialist I $ 160.00 Staff Professional I $ 155.00 CAD $ 120.00
Project Administrator $ 110.00 Litigation support 1.5x standard rate Non-Destructive Inspection/Testing $ 165.00 BASIS OF CHARGES FOR FIELD TECHNICIAN SERVICES Special Inspector $ 140.00 Field Work from 0 to 4 hours Bill 4 hours Engineering Technician $ 135.00 Field Work from 4 to 8 hours Bill 8 hours Technician $ 130.00 Field Work over 8 hours / Saturdays Bill time and a half Ground Penetrating Radar Scanning Technician $ 315.00 Sundays, holidays and over 12 hours Bill double time Core Drilling Technician $ 245.00 Night Shift (Shift commencing after 2pm / before 4am) Base Rate x 12.5% Floor Flatness Testing Technician $ 210.00 Show-up time (no work performed) Bill 2 hours Sample Pickup / Transportation / Delivery $ 120.00 Sampling or cylinder pickup, minimum charge Bill 2 hours Laboratory Technician $ 130.00
Group 1 - Special inspector $ 170.00 BASIS OF CHARGES FOR FIELD TECHNICIAN SERVICES Group 2 - Special Inspector $ 165.00 Field Work from 0 to 4 hours Bill 4 hours Group 3 - Engineering Technician $ 146.00 Field Work from 4 to 8 hours Bill 8 hours Group 3 - Geotechnical Professional $ 185.00 Field Work over 8 hours / Saturdays Bill time and a half Group 3 - Environmental Professional $ 185.00 Sundays, holidays and over 12 hours Bill double time Group 4 - Technician $ 130.00 Night Shift (Shift commencing after 2pm / before 4am) Base Rate x 12.5% Show-up time (no work performed) Bill 2 hours
Sampling or cylinder pickup, minimum charge Bill 2 hours Group 1 - Geotechnical Professional $ 185.00 BASIS OF CHARGES FOR FIELD TECHNICIAN SERVICES Group 1 - Environmental Professional $ 185.00 Field Work from 0 to 4 hours Bill 4 hours Group 1 - Technician $ 165.00 Field Work from 4 to 8 hours Bill 8 hours Group 2 - Special Inspector $ 170.00 Field Work over 8 hours / Saturdays Bill time and a half Group 3 - Non-Destuctive Testing (NDT) $ 180.00 Sundays, holidays and over 12 hours Bill double time Premium Shift (Weekday work before 6am / after 5pm) Bill time and a half Show-up time (no work performed) Bill 2 hours
Sampling or cylinder pickup, minimum charge Bill 2 hours Mileage (Portal to Portal) $ 1.00 Certified Payroll / DIR Upload (Monthly) $ 300.00 Bridge Toll Cost + 15% Non-Performance Certified Payroll / DIR Upload (Monthly) $ 100.00 Parking Fees Cost + 15% Subcontractor Management / Compliance Forms (Monthly)$ 100.00 Per Diem (as required) Quote / $250 min. Additional LCP Tracker or Other Compliance Software (Monthly) $ 200.00 Subconsultants/Subcontractors/Vendors/Expenses Cost + 15% Additional Special Forms, as required (Monthly) $ 150.00 Project Administration Fees 7% of Invoice Project Setup (Project) $ 525.00 DIR Administration Fees 3% of Invoice
REIMBURSABLES
NORTHERN CA PREVAILING WAGE LABOR RATES
SOUTHERN CA PREVAILING WAGE LABOR RATES
PERSONNEL RATES
Escalation: The rates noted below are subject to an annual increase of 3% or the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco Bay Area, whichver is greater, effective July 1 of each year following the initiation of a services agreement.
PROFESSIONAL STAFF
TECHNICAL STAFF - FIELD AND LABORATORY (NON-PREVAILING WAGE) BSK Fee Schedule 2023-2-NCE-STAN Page 1 of 3 52
BSK Associates - Schedule of Fees - 07/01/2024 to 06/30/2025 (City of Oakley) gINT (software) $ 65.00 LiqIT (software) $ 65.00
LPile (software) $ 65.00 Slide (software) $ 127.00
APile (software) $ 65.00 Settle3D (software) $ 127.00
SHAFT (software) $ 65.00 Cpet-IT (software) $ 65.00
GROUP (software) $ 127.00 LiqSVs (software) $ 65.00
Cliq (software) $ 65.00 ArcGIS (software) $ 65.00
LiquefyPro (software) $ 65.00 Surfer (software) $ 65.00 Nuclear Gauge (Day) $ 70.00 10' PVC Blank - 2"(Each) $ 27.00 Skidmore Wilhelm Calibrator (Day) $ 70.00 10' PVC Blank - 4: (Each) $ 62.00 NDT Weld Testing Equipment - UT/MT/PT (Day) $ 70.00 10' PVC Screen - 2" (Each) $ 42.00 Proof Load Testing Equipment (Day) $ 70.00 10' PVC Screen - 4" (Each) $ 84.00 Torque Wrench (Day) $ 70.00 5' PVC Blank - 2" (Each) $ 18.00 GPR Scanning Equipment (Day) $ 325.00 5' PVC Blank - 4" (Each) $ 53.00 Rebar Locator/Pachometer (Day) $ 128.00 5' PVC Screen - 2" (Each) $ 27.00 Coring Equipment (day) $ 240.00 5' PVC Screen - 4" (Each) $ 69.00 Relative Humidity Meter (Day) $ 70.00 55 Gallon Drum (Each) $ 125.00 Moisture Emission Test Kit (Each) $ 48.00 6 "x 5' Steel Monument Cover (Each) $ 295.00 Wood Moisture Meter (Day) $ 70.00 Air Indicators (Each) $ 53.00 Air Meter (Concrete) $ 70.00 Combustible Gas Indicator (Day) $ 79.00 Laptop (Day) $ 75.00 Disposable Bailer (Each) $ 14.00
Document Scanner (Day) $ 32.00 Hydro Punch Tip (Each) $ 25.00 Vehicle/Truck Charge (Day) $ 137.00 Lantec GEM 500 (Day) $ 258.00 Hand Auger (Day) $ 150.00 Locking Cap - 2" (Each) $ 25.00 Seismograph (Day) $ 317.00 Locking Cap - 4" (Each) $ 50.00 Hand-held GPS (Day) $ 97.00 Silicone Tubing (Foot) $ 9.00 Slope Inclinometer Probe (Each) $ 500.00 Tedlar Vapor Bags (Each) $ 30.00 Double Ring Infiltrometer (Day) $ 638.00 Bottom Cap (Each) $ 10.00 Drilling Kit - Paint/Stakes/Lath (Each) $ 34.00 Disposable Purge Pump Tubing (Foot) $ 2.00 Sample Sleeve w/ Caps/Teflon 6" (Each) $ 13.00 Bison Resistivity Meter (Day) $ 203.00 Manometer (Day) $ 247.00 Chem Grout Pump (Day) $ 132.00 Generator $ 105.00 DC Purge Pump (Day) $ 67.00
Power Auger $ 105.00 Development Pump and Controller (Day) $ 92.00 AC Cold Patch (Each) $ 13.00 Dissolved Oxygen Meter (Day) $ 80.00 Bentonite Grout (Bag) $ 27.00 Grundfos Converterm (Day) $ 89.00 Bentonite Medium Chips (Bag) $ 25.00 Hydropunch II (Each) $ 317.00 Bentonite Pellets (Bucket / Bag) $ 189.00 Interface Meter (Each) $ 119.00 Bentonite Powder (Bag) $ 15.00 Kemmer Sampler (Day) $ 46.00 Filter Sand (Bag) $ 14.00 ORP Meter (Each) $ 85.00
Portland Cement (Bag) $ 19.00 Sample Pump (Day) $ 127.00 Ready Mix (Bag) $ 18.00 Scanning Equipment (Day) $ 128.00 Padlocks (Each) $ 27.00 Water Level Data Logger (Day) $ 98.00 pH/EC/Temperature Meter (Day) $ 75.00 Telescopic Wastewater Sampler (Day) $ 67.00 PID/OVA (Day) $ 150.00 SVE System (Month) $1,400.00
Steam Cleaner (Day) $ 139.00 Combustible Gas Meter (Day) $ 240.00 Turbidity Kit (Day) $ 85.00 Water Meter (Day) $ 65.00
Water Sample Filters (Each) $ 28.00 Flow Monitoring Equipment (Day) $ 389.00 Well Sounder (Day) $ 60.00 Liquid Proportional Sampling Equipment (Day) $ 394.00 Well Vault Traffic Rated Box (Each) $ 139.00 Gas Detector Pump (Each) $ 46.00 Bollards (Each) $ 119.00 Landfill Gas Chromatograph (Day) $ 260.00 Air Compressor (Day) $ 70.00 Support Truck (Day) $ 260.00 Continuous Core Sampler (Day) $ 325.00 Sound Level Meter (Each) $ 41.00 4" Disposable Bailers (Each) $ 25.00 Water Level Transducers (Each) $ 15.00 Escalation: The rates noted below are subject to an annual increase of 3% or the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco Bay Area, whichver is greater, effective July 1 of each year following the initiation of a services agreement.
SOFTWARE AND EQUIPMENT
ANALYSIS SOFTWARE USAGE FEES
EQUIPMENT
BSK Fee Schedule 2023-2-NCE-STAN Page 2 of 3 53
BSK Associates - Schedule of Fees - 07/01/2024 to 06/30/2025 (City of Oakley) Modified or Standard Proctor - 4" or 6" Mold (ASTM / AASHTO) $ 320.00 % Crushed Particles / Fractured Particles (CT 205/AASHTO T335) $ 208.00 Proctor with Oversize Material (ASTM / AASHTO) $ 400.00 '% Flat & Elongated (ASTM D4791) $ 159.00 Proctor Check Point (All Methods) $ 171.00 Minus 200 Wash/Aggregate (ASTM C117) $ 105.00 Caltrans Maximum Wet Density (CT 216) $ 270.00 Sieve Analysis w/ Wash (ASTM C136 / CT 202 / AASHTO T27) $ 215.00 Minus 200 Wash Soil (ASTM D1140) $ 105.00 Sieve Analysis - Coarse Only (ASTM C136 / CT 202 / AASHTO T27) $ 105.00 Moisture Content of Soils (ASTM D2216) $ 54.00 Coarse Specific Gravity / Absorption (ASTM C127/CT 206/AASHTO T85) $ 200.00 Plasticity Index (ASTM D4318) $ 276.00 Fine Specific Gravity / Absorption (ASTM C128/CT 207/AASHTO T84) $ 200.00 Expansion Index of Soils (UBC No. 29) $ 296.00 Sand Equivalent (ASTM D2419 / CT 217 / AASHTO T176) $ 159.00 Collapse Potential of Soils (ASTM D2435) $ 257.00 Durability Index (CT 229) $ 315.00 Organic Impurities (ASTM C40 / CT 213) $ 105.00 Abrasion by LA Rattler, Large Size (ASTM C131/CT 211/AASHTO T96) $ 360.00 Tube Density & Moisture Content of Soil $ 63.00 Abrasion by LA Rattler, Small Size (ASTM C131/CT 211/AASHTO T96) $ 296.00 Visual Classification (ASTM D2488) $ 54.00 Cleanness Value of Aggregate (CT 227) $ 227.00 Hydrometer (ASTM D422 / CT 203) $ 300.00 Aggregate Wt pcf Compacted (ASTM C 29) $ 111.00 Double Hydrometer (ASTM D4221) $ 394.00 Gradation-Rip Rap - Per Sieve (D5519-Method A) $ 284.00 Uncompacted Void Content (CT 234 / AASHTO T304) $ 140.00 Sodium Sulfate Soundness-Min. Charge (ASTM C88/CT 214/AASHTO T104) $ 440.00 Sand Density Calibration (ASTM D1566) $ 220.00 Sodium Sulfate Soundness-Per Sieve (ASTM C88/CT 214/AASHTO T104) $ 140.00 Minimum Resistivity of Soils (CT 643) $ 177.00 R-Value of Soils (CT 301) $ 500.00 Consolidation (ASTM D2435) $ 527.00 Soil Cement Compression - Set (ASTM D1633) $ 300.00 Remolded Consolidation (ASTM D2435) $ 446.00 CIR / FDR Compressive Strength Testing - Set $ 300.00 Minimum Index Density Soils (ASTM D4254) $ 87.00 CIR / FDR Sample Preparation / Compaction $ 275.00 Direct Shear Remolded (ASTM D3080) $ 330.00 CBR (ASTM D1883/AASHTO T-180) $1,250.00 % Lumps/Friable Particles (ASTM C142) $ 102.00 Preparation of Soil-Cement Samples $ 947.00 '% Organics in Soil (ASTM D2974) $ 172.00 Soluble Sulfate Chloride & Sulfide $ 164.00 Direct Shear (ASTM D3080) $ 276.00 pH Sulphate & Chloride $ 83.00 Remolded Direct Shear (ASTM D3080) $ 330.00 Corrosivity - Sulfate Chloride Sulfide $ 164.00 Remolded Flexwall Perm (ASTM D5084) $ 704.00 Corrosivity - Soil pH Test $ 83.00 JMF Mix Design, Superpave / Caltrans $11,274.00 Bitumen Content - Ignition (ASTM D6307 / CT382 / AASHTO T308) $ 155.00 JMF Verification - HMA - Superpave / Caltrans $6,533.00 Oil Content Correction Factor (ASTM D6307 / CT 382 / AASHTO T308) $ 656.00 JMF Production Startup - Superpave / Caltrans $6,078.00 Gradation from Extraction (ASTM D5444 / AASHTO T30) $ 123.60 RAP Material Testing - Additional Fee $ 790.00 Bulk Specific Gravity (CT308 / AASHTO T275 / ASTM D2726) $ 45.00 Rubberized RHMA Material - Additional Fee $1,824.00 HMA Theo. Max Density Rice Method (ASTM D2041 / CT 309 / AASHTO T209) $ 155.00 JMF Mix Design, HVEEM $3,900.00 Volumetric Calculations (VMA, VFA, DP, AV, Eff. Calcs) $ 67.00 JMF Mix Design, Marshall $4,627.00 Moisture Content of Asphalt (CT 370 / AASHTO T329) $ 83.00 Open Graded Asphalt Optimum Bitumen Content (CT 368) $2,785.00 Film Stripping $ 111.00 Gyratory Compaction - Set of 3 (AASHTO T312) $ 421.00 Compaction/Preparation of HMA Briquette (CT 304) $ 276.00 Hamburg Wheel Track (AASHTO T324) $2,500.00 Stabilometer Value - Set of 3 (CT366) $ 350.00 Tensile Strength Ratio (CT 371 / AASHTO T283) $1,380.00 Lab Mixed TSR - Moisture Induced Damage (AASHTO T283 / CT 371) $1,850.00 Marshall Maximum Density (ASTM D6926) $ 368.00 Calculated AC Maximum Density (CT 367) $ 125.00 Marshall Stability & Flow (ASTM D6927) $ 315.00 Thickness Determination of AC Cores $ 27.00 Compression Test Concrete - Per Cylinder (ASTM C39) $ 35.00 Flexural Test per Beam (ASTM C78 / CT 523) $ 112.00 Compression Test Concrete - Set of 4/5 (ASTM C39) $ 171.00 Linear Shrinkage - Set of 3 (ASTM C157) $ 500.00 Compression Test of Core (ASTM C42) $ 76.00 Unit Weight Lt Wt Concrete (ASTM C567) $ 70.00 Compressive Strength of Shotcrete Panel $ 400.00 Splitting Tensile Strength of Concrete (ASTM C496) $ 150.00 Compression Test Composite CMU Prism (1) $ 208.00 Compressive Strength CMU Block (ASTM C140) $ 240.00 Compression Test Grout (Set of 4) $ 151.00 Comp. Strength, SG, & Abs. of CMU - Per Block (ASTM C140) $ 276.00 Compression Test Mortar (Set of 3) $ 138.00 Masonry Linear Shrinkage (ASTM C426) $ 507.00 Tensile & Bend of Rebar #3-11 $ 186.00 Brinell Hardness of Steel (ASTM E10) $ 125.00 Slip and Tensile Rebar Couplers (CT 670) $ 270.00 Rockwell Hardness of Steel (ASTM E18) $ 125.00 Bolt Proof & Ultimate Load $ 178.00 Face Bend of Steel Coupon $ 76.00 Bolt Hardness - Set of 3 $ 125.00 Root Bend of Weld Coupon $ 76.00 Nut Proof Load - Set of 3 $ 178.00 Side Bend of Weld Coupon $ 76.00 Nut Hardness - Set of 3 $ 125.00 Tensile Test of Steel Coupon $ 105.00 Washer Hardness - Set of 3 $ 125.00 Bend Test of Steel Coupon $ 90.00 Dry Density Fireproofing (ASTM E605) $ 119.00 Adhesion / Cohesion Fireproofing Materials $ 159.00
METALS & FIREPROOFING
Escalation: The rates noted below are subject to an annual increase of 3% or the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco Bay Area, whichver is greater, effective July 1 of each year following the initiation of a services agreement.
MATERIALS LABORATORY TESTS
Standard Rate Applys to Normal Testing Schedule. Rush Order Turnaround Time Charged at 1.5 x Standard Unit Rates.
HOT MIX ASPHALT
CONCRETE & MASONRY
SOILS & AGGREGATES
BSK Fee Schedule 2023-2-NCE-STAN Page 3 of 3 54
Resolution No. __-24 Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. -24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY
APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BSK
ASSOCIATES FOR ON-CALL MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT FOR FISCAL YEARS 2024/25 AND 202526
WHEREAS, the City of Oakley utilizes the services of consultants to provide support services on a wide range of construction projects where the scope and magnitude for many of the tasks are larger than what City staff can perform; and WHEREAS, BSK Associates has performed materials testing services for the City on a number of construction projects in an exemplary way and have accommodated the City’s service needs; and
WHEREAS, The award of the agreement is exempt from competitive bidding under Section 3.6.010 of the Oakley Municipal Code paragraph 1) which provides an exception for competitive bidding on “Contracts involving the acquisition of professional or specialized services, such as, but not limited to, services rendered by architects, attorneys, engineers, and other specialized consultants” Currently, for all such contract services above the $50,000 amount, the City Council must authorize the work by simple majority per the City’s purchasing policy.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, by the City Council of the City of Oakley that the On-Call Materials Testing proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A with BSK Associates for FY 2024/25 and 2025/26 for an amount not to exceed $75,000.00 per fiscal year is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute an agreement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED, if at the end of the term the services have been performed satisfactorily the City Manager has the discretion to approve an extension of the agreement to June 30, 2028, under the same terms as the original agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oakley at a meeting held on May 28, 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
55 Resolution No. __-24 Page 2
APPROVED:
_______________________
ATTEST: Anissa Williams, Mayor
_____________________ _______________________
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
56 STAFF REPORT
City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: May 28, 2024
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Bellecci and Associates, Inc. to Provide Design Services for East Cypress Road Widening (Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road) Project - Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Number 302 Background and Analysis
The City’s adopted Fiscal Year (FY) 2023/24 Capital Improvement Program Budget designates funding for various infrastructure improvements in the community. This is consistent with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+ goals to improve the quality of the City’s public infrastructure and to enhance the quality of life for our residents.
The improvements to East Cypress Road have been a key part of the City’s CIP program as established by the City Council, and a priority for the community to accommodate the growing needs of the residents of the East Cypress Road corridor.
Over the past few years as private development projects were constructed, each respective private development project constructed the new East Cypress Road along their frontage as seen along Emerson Ranch and Delaney Park subdivisions. The construction of the improvements to widen East Cypress Road along the Burroughs Subdivision will commence in spring 2024 and is anticipated to be completed by summer 2025. The completion of this project will bring the improvements to the widened East Cypress Roadto west of Jersey Island Road.
ACD TI Capital Group, the developer of the Grand Cypress Preserve project was originally slated to construct the improvements to East Cypress Road from the CCWD canal to Bethel Island Road. The Grand Cypress Preserve project would be the largest residential development project that has been planned in Oakley and would take several years to construct. The developer informed the City that they have placed their development project on hold and will not be constructing the East Cypress Road improvements until a date yet to be determined.
The uncertainty of the construction of the improvements to this important section of East Cypress Road on the developer’s part necessitated that the City negotiate with the developer to reach an agreement. This agreement included the acquisition of the right of way and transfer of all plans and permits that the developer had been working on for the East Cypress Road improvements. The City Council approved the Superseding Agreement on October 24, 2023, regarding reimbursement for and implementation of construction of the improvements related to the Grand Cypress Preserve Project. This agreement was executed in order for the Approved and
Forwarded to the
City Council
57 STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 2
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US City to undertake the design and construction of the East Cypress Road improvements. The Developer handed over project documents to the City on December 14, 2023.
The improvements to East Cypress Road that would have been constructed by ACD TI Capital Group is divided into two (2) CIP projects.
CIP 310 is for the East Cypress Road Widening Project and CCWD canal undergrounding at the intersection with Jersey Island Road. The design of this project is currently underway, and construction anticipated to start in spring 2025.
CIP 302 is for East Cypress Road Widening and Improvements from Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road. Staff have worked with Bellecci and Associates, Inc. the design engineering firm who has been working on preparation of the improvement plans for the East Cypress Road corridor to define a comprehensive and concise scope of work for the completion of the engineering design for the widening and improvements of East Cypress Road (Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road). The results from these discussions generated a very competitively priced proposal for the completion of the design for this project.
The project schedule is to have this project design completed during 2024 and to start the construction of CIP 302 by summer 2025.
Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
The approval of this agreement is consistent with the Oakley Strategic Plan under our Community Health and Safety Goal to provide safe streets in our City. East Cypress Road is a critical segment in the Oakley roadway infrastructure network that will serve existing and future communities in the eastern portion of the City.
Fiscal Impact
The funding for the design of this project has been included in the Capital Improvement budget for Fiscal Year 2023/24 for CIP 302.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the proposal with Bellecci and Associates, Inc. for providing engineering design services associated with CIP Number 302 – East Cypress Road Widening (Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road) Project and to authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement for a not to exceed amount of $309,543.00.
Attachments
1) Resolution
2) Bellecci and Associates, Inc. Proposal
58 RESOLUTION NO.___-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN A CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BELLECCI AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR DESIGN
SERVICES FOR THE EAST CYPRESS ROAD WIDENING PROJECT (JERSEY ISLAND ROAD TO BETHEL ISLAND ROAD) – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NUMBER 302
WHEREAS, as part of the Fiscal Year 2023/24 Budget the City of Oakley approved a 5-Year Capital improvement Program (CIP); and WHEREAS, Project Number 302 is to widen East Cypress Road from Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road; and
WHEREAS, staff solicited a proposal from Bellecci and Associates, Inc. for the design of this project; and
WHEREAS, Bellecci and Associates, Inc. has submitted a comprehensive proposal at a very competitive cost for engineering design services for CIP Project Number 302 for an amount not to exceed $309,543.00; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, that the City Council of the City of Oakley hereby approves the proposal from Bellecci and Associates Inc. for engineering design services for CIP Project Number 302 for an amount not to exceed $309,543.00 in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, and authorizing the City Manager to execute this into an Agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oakley at a meeting held on the 28th of May 2024 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
APPROVED:
_______________________
ATTEST: Anissa Williams, Mayor
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
59 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 A Proposal to City of Oakley
East Cypress Road Widening/
Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road
CIP #302
May 8, 2024
East Cypress Road / Jersey Island Road • City of Oakley 60 May 8, 2024
Mr. Kevin Rohani, PE
Public Works Director/City Engineer
City of Oakley
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
Re: Proposal for the East Cypress Road Widening: Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road CIP#302 Dear Mr. Rohani,
Bellecci & Associates (Bellecci) is very excited to submit our proposal to provide professional design, engineering, and surveying services to the City of Oakley for a new high profile project on East Cypress Road. Enclosed you will find our Technical Proposal and proposed fee estimate to provide the necessary services to deliver a successful project to the City.
We appreciate your time in reviewing our proposal for the East Cypress Road Widening: Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road CIP#302. We have a tremendous level of existing knowledge about the City of Oakley’s infrastructure within the Grand Cypress Preserve specific plan area and strong familiarity with the various stakeholders such as Contra Costa Water District, Ironhouse Sanitary District, and Delta Diablo Water District. Our experience within the City has been gained over the course of our 30+ year track record of working directly in Oakley, for the City and on a substantial number of private projects. This includes our site-specific knowledge of East Cypress Road including our design work with ACD-TI Capital on the Grand Cypress Preserve Improvements. We believe our team’s extensive knowledge about the City and the surrounding communities, as well as our outstanding qualifications will set us apart from other consultants.
To compliment our substantial civil qualifications and deep understanding of Oakley’s infrastructure, Bellecci has teamed up with BMA Structural Engineers, a highly qualified structural construction engineering firm who has designed several projects in the western United States.
Listed below is the Bellecci relevant experience to serve the City of Oakley on the East Cypress Road Widening, Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road Project:
• Bellecci prepared the final design bid construction plans and specifications for City of Oakley on the nearby City CIP 247 project, on East Cypress Road which is currently in construction.
• Bellecci is also assiting the City on the CIP 302 East Cypress Road Widening at the Contra Costa Canal project • Bellecci is extremely familiar with the existing conditions since we performed the land surveying and utility investigations within the Grand Cypress Preserve project area, and we have been working on the adjacent properties and roadways for the past 8 years. • We have designed similar high-profile arterial roadways, road widening, and/or pavement and general roadway improvements for the Cities of:
Alameda, Concord, Dublin, Pittsburg, Suisun City, and the County of Alameda We look forward to having the opportunity to deliver a successful project to the City of Oakley. If you have any questions, please contact me at 925 • 685 • 4569 or at [email protected].
Sincerely,
Daniel Leary, PE PTOE QSD
PE License #C48394
OAKLEY | East Cypress Road Widening: Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road CIP#302 61
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Firm Profile: Bellecci 1
Project Understanding & Approach
Scope of Work: Bellecci 2
Statement of Qualifications
Relevant Projects 9
Key Staff Resumes 13
Organization Chart 23
References 24
Hourly Rate Schedule 25
Cost Proposal 26
OAKLEY | East Cypress Road Widening: Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road CIP#302 62 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 1 Firm Profile: Bellecci
COMPANY INFORMATION
Bellecci is a California Corporation, formed in 1983, who provides civil engineering, land surveying, and construction management services to both public sector and private clients in Northern California. Bellecci is well known to Cities, Counties, and other agencies in Marin County, the East Bay, the Peninsula, and Silicon Valley. The firm has been the civil engineer and surveyor on 20+ Transportation Corridor Improvement Projects over the past decade as shown on the list below.
MOST RELEVANT PROJECTS
Client Project Budget
Alameda, County of E. 14th Complete Streets Ph. II (1 mile) $16M Alameda, County of Mission Blvd. Complete Streets+ Rule 20A (1 mile) $25M Alameda, County of Stanton Avenue - Ph I & II $6M
Alameda, County of Fairmont Avenue Pavement | Bike Lanes $2M Alameda, County of A Street Improvements - Class IV $1M Alameda, County of Via Enrico / Channel Street Gap Closure $1.5M Alameda, City of Webster St. / Willie Stargell Ave. (SR 260)* (1 mile) $6.7M Belmont, City of Notre Dame Pavement & SD Rehab $2.3M
Brentwood, City of Brentwood Blvd. Medians (.5 mile) $1.46M Burlingame, City of Downtown Burlingame Avenue Streetscape $15M Concord, City of Downtown Sidewalks, Driveways, ADA Ramps $205k Cupertino, City of Cupertino Bike Boulevards $1.38M
Cupertino, City of Stevens Creek Blvd. Bike Lanes $921k Davis, City of Downtown Third St. Complete Streets $6M
Dublin, City of Dublin Blvd. Widening | Rule 20 (1.9 miles) $4.5M El Cerrito, City of San Pablo Ave. Streetscape | Rain Gardens $3.5M Galt, City of So. Galt SRTS, Green Bike Lanes & Pave Rehab (1.3 miles) $1.69M** Martinez, City of Marina Vista Complete Streets & UUD (.6 mile) $3.9M Pittsburg West Leland Pavement Improvements $974k
Redwood City, City of Middlefield Rd. Complete Streets |UUD (.5 mile) $9M San Bruno, City of Downtown San Bruno Ave. Ped. Improve. $613K San Pablo, City of El Portal Streetscape, Gateway, UUD (2.5 miles) $3.8M Saratoga, City of Prospect Rd./ Saratoga Ave. Complete Streets (1.9 mi) $4.7M Sunnyvale, City of Downtown Murphy Avenue Streetscape $4.5M Sunnyvale, City of Hendy Avenue Complete Streets (.4 mile) $2M+ UC Berkeley Historic Piedmont Ave. Complete Streets $1.5M Vallejo, City of Downtown Streetscape Ph I-III (10 blocks) $6.4M Daniel Leary, PE, PTOE, QSD
Principal in Charge
MBA: Cal State Hayward, Hayward, CA
BSCE: Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
PE: CA 48394
PTOE: 3935
QSD/P: 24867
CAPACITY:
38 Bellecci Employees
OFFICES:
2290 Diamond Blvd., Ste. 100
Concord, CA 94520
925 • 685 • 4569
7077 Koll Center Parkway, Ste. 210
Pleasanton , CA
925 • 685 • 4885
* See image above
** Project was combined with one designed
by another firm
Dublin Blvd. Widening & Complete Streets • Dublin, CA
63 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 2 Scope of Work SCOPEOFWORK
OAKLEY | East Cypress Road - CIP 1
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND BACKGROUND
Project Understanding:
The City of Oakley is seeking to retain a design consultant for engineering design services to expedite the design and construction of the East Cypress Road (ECR) roadway widening improvements from east of the Jersey Island Road (JIR) intersection to Bethel Island Road (BIR). The City took ownership of the plans and technical specifications prepared by Bellecci under contract with ACD-TI Oakley for ECR. In general, the plans will be converted from a developer plan set to a CIP project with City technical specifications and bid form. The design team will show the improvements associated with the East Cypress Road Widening at Jersey Island Road as the existing condition for this project.
PROJECT APPROACH AND SCOPE OF WORK
Description of Work:
Bellecci & Associates, Inc. (CONSULTANT) will provide design engineering services to the City of Oakley (CITY) for the East Cypress Road Project (ECR), which includes preparation of plans, technical specifications, estimates (PS&E), and project management.
Plan items included on May 10, 2023 ECR plan set
The May 10, 2023 plan set was reviewed by Contra Costa Fire Protection District (CCFPD), Iron house Sanitary District (ISD), Diablo Water District (DWD), and CITY. The Improvement plan set included the following:
• Storm water treatment and storm drain system design
• Diablo Water District (DWD) new 20” main line extension • DWD existing 24” DIP main line relocation at select locations • ISD new 14” force main design
• ISD new 8” force main design
• New 8” gravity sanitary sewer main on existing East Cypress Road • New sidewalk and Class II bike lanes
• New traffic signal improvements at the intersection of Street ‘A’ and East Cypress Road, and signal interconnect conduit improvements to connect to adjacent signalized intersections • Traffic signal modifications at Bethel Island Road intersection • New median islands, street trees and street lighting
• Roadway pavement rehabilitation within those portions of existing East Cypress Road that will remain • Modification of the roadway geometry to meet the City's future needs. • Provisions for the coordination and cooperation with the private contractor working for the Grand Cypress Preserve project
• Design of existing driveway connections to the new roadway • Preparation of legal descriptions and associated plat maps for right of way acquisition and/or easement acquisitions • Temporary construction easements
ECR Plan Items to be Revised for CIP Project – included in the CIP 302 Scope of Work For the items listed above that were designed as part of the May 10, 2023 plans, the following items will be revised to convert the project plans to an Oakley Capital Improvement Project and to reflect the reduced scope of improvements:
A. Remove roadway improvement scope west of Station 126+00 a. CIP 310 improvements reflected as existing condition B. Utility installation coordination
a. Extension of new DWD 20” water main to ‘A’ Street
b. Relocation of existing DWD 24” water main into new ECR at select locations c. Installation of new ISD 14” sanitary sewer force main d. Installation of new ISD 8” sanitary sewer force main, beginning at ‘A’ street e. Installation of new 8” gravity sanitary sewer along existing East Cypress Road C. Staging plans showing the overall sequence of work, lane width and number of lane requirements for each stage, 64 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 3 SCOPE Scope of Work OFWORK
OAKLEY | East Cypress Road - CIP 2
and adjacent City project coordination requirements.
D. Revise cross sections to show proposed roadway, sidewalk, and embankment slopes; R/W and roadway limits; and backfill and excavation areas
a. Perform excavation and import fill quantity calculations E. Revise future ‘A’ St to account for any changes by CBG at the intersection F. Project Technical Specifications matching CIP 310 format G. Construction Sequencing and traffic control performance specifications for contractor to provide traffic control plans and traffic control system during construction
H. Detailed SWPPP specifications for contractor to perform storm water pollution control I. On-site C.3 Mitigation Measures (Biotreatment Area Design) J. PG&E Application and Coordination
a. Applications for new signal connection and new irrigation controller K. Landscape and irrigation design
L. Corrosion protection design for water main
Items of work included as part of the separate CIP 310 design project.
A. Dry utility coordination and design
B. Existing water and sewer force main relocation at Jersey Island Road C. Structural engineering design for culvert crossing
D. Roadway embankment and widening at Jersey Island Road Intersection Items of work not included in this agreement or performed by others under separate agreement. • Right of Way acquisition and legal descriptions
• Additional Potholing of existing utilities
• We assume Environmental Clearances (CEQA) are completed or work to be done by others.
TASK 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1.1 Project Management: CONSULTANT will be responsible for managing both the technical and non-technical, organization related administrative work. The key project management tasks that will be implemented by Bellecci include establishing and updating the project schedule, monitoring and updating the project budget, scheduling coordination meetings with key parties, subconsultant coordination, and status reports. More details on the key Project Management tasks are summarized below.
1.2 Schedule: The project schedule will be created in MS Project and submitted to the CITY for review and approval. In addition, CONSULTANT will submit monthly invoices that highlight the approved budget, budget remaining, and amount spent for the invoicing period, estimated cost at completion and an estimate of the percent complete.
1.3 Meetings: Attend meetings with CITY staff and utility coordination meetings as required by the CITY. The meetings will include:
• Four (4) Design Review Meetings with CITY Public Works/CIP staff including Kickoff meeting, meeting prior to 95% submittal to discuss proposed design for new scope items, meeting after 95% submittal, and meeting after 100% submittal for ECR.
• CONSULTANT will prepare the Agenda, organize, and conduct the meetings. Subconsultants will not attend/participate in meetings with the CITY.
TASK 2 SUPPLEMENTAL FIELD SURVEY
2.1 Supplemental Field Surveys: CONSULTANT will perform two (2) days of supplemental ground survey to survey the proposed and existing East Cypress Road areas. Survey includes EP, poles, overhead wires, utility boxes, air release valves, pipe culverts, fences, markers, signs, ditches, water valves, gas valves, utility structures, paint markings and trees.
65 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 4 Scope of Work
SCOPEOFWORK
OAKLEY | East Cypress Road - CIP 3
TASK 3 BIOTREATMENT AREAS
3.1 Biotreatment Area Layout and Grading: CONSULTANT will revise the project layout to include biotreatment areas.
Biotreatment areas will be sized in compliance with the Contra Costa Clean Water Program C.3 Guidebook.
Biotreatment areas will be connected to the proposed storm drain system, with revised storm drain profiles. Consultant will update the roadway grading plans to direct runoff to the biotreatment areas. Consultant will prepare a Storm Water Control Plan and C.3 report.
3.2 Biotreatment Area Details: CONSULTANT will develop biotreatment area details in compliance with City storm drain standards and Contra Costa Clean Water Program C.3 Guidebook. Details will include biotreatment vertical curb, biotreatment curb and gutter, curb opening, soil mix, inlet, cleanout, and pipe details .
TASK 4 MEDIAN AND BIORETENTION PLANTING
4.1 Landscape and Irrigation Plans: CONSULTANT’s landscape architect will extend the planting theme from the previous CIP 247 and CIP 310 projects to the portion of East Cypress Road from Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road. Planting plans will address the irrigation strategy options, streetscape planting and irrigation, streetscape median pavers, and storm water treatment areas. Biotreatment planting shall be in compliance with the Contra Costa Clean Water Program C.3 Guidebook. Irrigation plans will include extending existing service or installing new meter and backflow. Planting and irrigation details will be included.
TASK 5 SEPARATE PLANS FOR ISD
5.1 Sanitary Sewer Force Main Profile: CONSULTANT will prepare additional plan sheets showing proposed Ironhouse Sanitary District 14” Sanitary Sewer Force Main plan and profile from the project limit east of Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road. The plan view will indicate a separate force main alignment stationing, station/offset labels, alignment labels, and ISD notes. The profile view will show surface profile along the force main alignment, force main profile, crossing utilities, and dimensions.
TASK 6 SEPARATE PLANS FOR DWD
6.1 Water Main Profile: CONSULTANT will prepare additional plan sheets showing proposed Diablo Water District 20” Water Main plan and profile from the project limit east of Jersey Island Road to ‘A’ Street. The plan view will indicate a separate water main alignment stationing, station/offset labels, alignment labels, and DWD notes. The profile view will show surface profile along the water main alignment, water main profile, crossing utilities, and dimensions.
TASK 7 CORROSION PLANS
7.1 Site Soil Corrosivity Evaluation: CONSULTANT’s subconsultant will perform on-site inspection, including measuring in-situ soil resistivities at selected locations throughout the project site using the Wenner 4-pin technique. In-situ soil resistivities will be measured to a depth of 15 feet and Barnes Layer calculations will be utilized to determine the variation of resistivity versus soil depth. Subconsultant will evaluate the results of the in-situ soil resistivities and determine the corrosivity of the soils at the site to the proposed underground utilities and associated appurtenances.
7.2 Soil Corrosivity Engineering Report: CONSULTANT’s subconsultant will prepare an engineering report that will provide a summary of the field data collected and an analysis of this data. The potential for corrosion on the underground utilities will be determined based on the analysis and recommendations for the long-term prevention of corrosion will be included. All fieldwork and recommendations will be in compliance with NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers) and Local Water District Corrosion Control Standards.
7.3 Corrosion Control Design Services: CONSULTANT’s subconsultant will prepare detailed installation drawings, 66 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 5 SCOPE Scope of Work OFWORK
OAKLEY | East Cypress Road - CIP 4
technical specifications, and engineering cost estimate for a corrosion control system for the subject underground metallic utilities. All drawings and specifications shall be suitable for bidding purposes. Design drawings and specifications will be prepared in accordance with the project standards. All cathodic protection designs will be in accordance with NACE Standard SP0169-13. Two design submittals are anticipated; one at the 95% design phase and another at the 100% design phase.
TASK 8 LIGHTING RELOCATION AT ECR/BIR INTERSECTION
8.1 Street Lighting Relocation: CONSULTANT’s subconsultant will include the design for street lighting relocation at East Cypress Road/Bethel Island Road intersection with new meter for lighting. The consultant will coordinate with PG&E for new business applications. We assume the City of Oakley to pay the fees for the new application and service.
TASK 9 COORDINATION WITH CBG AT ‘A’ ST FOR UTILITY REDESIGN
9.1 Coordination with CBG: CONSULTANT will coordinate with CBG for design changes at ‘A’ St. Consultant will revise drawings based on most recent CBG utility design at ‘A’ St. We assume two (2) virtual meetings with CBG for utility coordination.
TASK 10 ALLOWANCE FOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
10.1 Structural Engineering Allowance: CONSULTANT’s subconsultant will prepare signed and stamped structural engineering design drawings and details for structural issues that may be encountered during design. Examples of possible structural engineering drawings required include retaining wall design, custom lighting footing details, and custom utility structure details.
TASK 11 ECR 95% PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND COST ESTIMATE
11.1 95% Plans & Estimate
CONSULTANT will prepare plans, specifications and bid items in standard CITY format. CONSULTANT will provide the CITY with submittals at 95% completion. CONSULTANT will also prepare an Engineer Opinion of Probable Construction Cost and will submit this in a MS Excel spreadsheet. Specifications, as necessary, will be prepared utilizing the latest City of Oakley Standard Specifications where they exist, and Caltrans Standard Specifications where City of Oakley Specifications do not exist. Bid documents will be prepared in MS Word format. The printing allowance in the budget will be tracked during design, and the actual amount spent on printing will depend on the number of copies the City requests for each submittal.
Title Sheet: CONSULTANT will include a sheet index identifying all the sheets with sheet numbers.
Key Map: CONSULTANT will edit as necessary the current key map for the East Cypress Road Project with sheet designation. The Key map is a small-scale graphic line diagram showing sheet arrangements, alignment lines and station lines.
Survey Control Plan: CONSULTANT will prepare a Survey Control Plan for the East Cypress Corridor from Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road. The Survey Control Plan will identify the survey monuments along the corridor with monument information. Project benchmark and basis of bearing information will also be included on these plans.
Street Cross Sections: CONSULTANT will review and update cross sections every 100 ft for the East Cypress Corridor (within the project limits) showing the structural elements of the roadway from the May 10, 2023 plan set. The street cross sections are a graphic representation of existing conditions, and the work to be performed as they predominantly appear within the station limits shown (only major items of work are shown).
Existing sections will be shown as dashed lines. Multiple typical cross sections to be shown on a single sheet with the lowest stationing shown on the bottom sheet and the sections will go up the sheet as the stationing advances. The typical section will be shown looking up station. The beginning and end stations of each typical cross section would typically break 67 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 6 Scope of Work SCOPEOFWORK
OAKLEY | East Cypress Road - CIP 5
at full 100-foot stations, unless the break in the typical sections requires more detailed accuracy.
Horizontal Control Plan: CONSULTANT will prepare Horizontal Control Plan Sheets containing general project data such as the proposed construction, existing facilities, horizontal alignment, right of way lines and construction notes with stationing. Layout sheets will be oriented to show mainline stationing progressing left to right. Layout sheets will be 1"=40' scale drawings. Grading Plans will be included in lieu of profiles. Pavement Rehabilitation areas will be identified on the layout plans with hatching corresponding to new pavement structural sections, grind and inlay, overlay at conforms, full depth hot mix asphalt areas.
Demolition Plans: CONSULTANT will prepare demolition plan sheets containing general project data such as existing facilities, horizontal alignment, right of way lines and construction notes with stationing identifying the limits of demolition.
Demolition sheets will also be oriented to show mainline stationing progressing left to right. Demolition sheets will be 1"=40' scale drawings. Demolition notes will be included with references to the plans identifying removal of fences, walls, trees, structures, protection of existing structures, etc.
Construction Details: CONSULTANT will prepare civil related construction details such as curb ramp enlargements with grading, pavement transitions, curb transitions, bioretention areas etc.
Utility Plan and Profile (Water and Sanitary Sewer Force Main): CONSULTANT will prepare Utility plan sheets identifying visible utility structures with available existing utility information from record and utility maps. The location of the utilities is to be shown to the best degree of information available. Utility Legend and Utility contacts will be included on the first utility plan sheet. These plans will identify the utility impacts - removal, abandonment, relocations. Drainage Improvements will be shown on the Improvement Plan. Relocated sanitary sewer force main, relocated DWD 24” water main and extended DWD 20” water main will be shown on the utility plan and profile sheets. Phasing exhibits for the relocated 24 “ DWD water main will be provided.
Temporary Water Pollution Control Plans: CONSULTANT will prepare temporary water pollution control plan sheets identifying Best Management Practices (BMP's) for Water Pollution Control (WPC). This plan will also identify the project risk level based on the Construction General Permit SWPPP Requirements.
Storm Water Control Plans: CONSULTANT will prepare storm water control plans identifying the drainage management areas and general stormwater runoff flow direction. The SWCP will also include the post-construction impervious, pervious, treatment, and landscape areas in tabular format.
Grading Plans: CONSULTANT will prepare Grading Plans showing existing topographic survey information of existing grading, and new grading information with slopes shown along the gutters and cross slopes shown every 100'. No grading plans will be prepared for segments where there are no civil improvements. Grading enlargement details will be included in construction details or as part of the grading plans.
Drainage Plans: CONSULTANT will prepare Drainage plan sheets identifying a visual representation in plan view aspect of the drainage facilities showing visible existing drainage structures with available existing utility information from record and utility maps. The location of the utilities will be shown to the best degree of information available. A drainage system number will be assigned to each drainage system on the project where work is to be performed.
New drainage information will be shown on the plans as systems 1, 2, 3 and so on, and each system pipes and inlets identified as A, B, C etc. These plans will identify the drainage impacts - removal, abandonment, relocations and new drainage infrastructure improvements. If there is no drainage work to be performed on a corresponding project layout sheet, the drainage plan sheet for this area will be omitted.
Drainage Profiles: CONSULTANT will prepare Drainage Profiles for the New Drainage Systems. Drainage profiles will show new pipe type, size, length, and location. The existing ground line profile will be shown as a dashed line and finished grade shown as solid line. The inverts at Manholes and structures will be identified and the slopes of the drainage pipes will be shown using percentage for slopes. Drainage system numbers and unit designations on the profiles will correspond to the 68 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 7 SCOPE Scope of Work OFWORK
OAKLEY | East Cypress Road - CIP 6
drainage plan sheets.
Traffic Signal Design: CONSULTANT’s subconsultant will prepare a 1” = 20’ scale plan sheet for the 8 new traffic signals at the intersection of ‘A’ St/East Cypress Road and 4 new traffic signals at Bethel Island Road/East Cypress Road. The plans will include features and details required by the City.
Traffic Signal Interconnect Plans: CONSULTANT’s subconsultant will include the design for interconnect equipment extending the interconnect system along East Cypress Road from Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road.
Signing and Striping Design: CONSULTANT will prepare signing and striping plans per the City standards. The plans will include removal, modification, and installation of lane markings, markers, striping, bike lanes, crosswalk stripes, and signs as necessary for the improvements. Additional improvements such as green bike lane transitions shall be added as desired by the City.
Structural Details: CONSULTANT’s subconsultant will include structural details as necessary.
Cathodic Protection Plan: CONSULTANT’s subconsultant will include designs for cathodic protection for the water mains.
Planting Plan: CONSULTANT’s subconsultant will include planting design for the bioretention areas and planted medians where they occur.
Landscape Details: CONSULTANT’s subconsultant will include details associated with the planting design.
Irrigation Plan and Details: CONSULTANT’s subconsultant will include design for the irrigation system and new irrigation service connections and associated details to support the planting plan design.
11.2 95% Plans, Specifications and Estimates
The 95% plans, specifications and bid items will be compiled in the standard City format. The 95% submittal will incorporate the comments from the CITY on the previous submittal. The submittal at this stage will be comprised of the sheets described below. See below List of Sheet Series:
1. Title Sheet
2. General Notes
3. Key Map
4. Survey Control Plan
5. Typical Sections
6. Layout Plans
7. Grading Plan (Grading enlargements and other civil details)
8. Temporary Water Pollution Control Plans
9. Storm Water Control Plan
10. Demolition Plans
11. Drainage Plans
12. Drainage Profiles
13. Utility Plans (Including ISD and DWD new mains with profiles)
14. Corrosion Control Plans
15. Construction Staging Plans
16. Signing & Striping Plan
17. Traffic Signal Plans
18. Traffic Signal Interconnect plans
19. Street Lighting Plans
20. Structural Details
21. Planting Plan
22. Landscape Details
23. Irrigation Plan
SCOPEOFWORK
24. Irrigation Details
11.3 Street Lighting: CONSULTANT’s subconsultant will review the reduced scope and revise the May 10, 2023 plan set street lighting design to maintain previously designed street light spacing.
TASK 12 ECR FINAL DESIGN PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND COST ESTIMATE CONSULTANT ill lifitid bid ititdd CITY ft ittht
69 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 8 Scope of Work
SCOPEOFWORK
OAKLEY | East Cypress Road - CIP 7
24. Irrigation Details
11.3 Street Lighting: CONSULTANT’s subconsultant will review the reduced scope and revise the May 10, 2023 plan set street lighting design to maintain previously designed street light spacing.
TASK 12 ECR FINAL DESIGN PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND COST ESTIMATE CONSULTANT will prepare plans, specifications and bid items in standard CITY format in response to the comments received for the 95% submittal. Bid documents will be prepared in MS Word format. The printing allowance in the budget will be tracked during design, and the actual amount spent on printing will depend on the number of copies the City requests for each submittal.
12.1 100% Bid PS&E Submittal: CONSULTANT will provide one round of edits for a back check set. CONSULTANT will issue one final bid set, stamped and wet-signed by the Registered Professional Engineer and Traffic Engineer. The bid set will incorporate the corrections and plan check responses from CITY review.
TASK 13 BIDDING SUPPORT
13.1 Bidding Support: CONSULTANT will provide bidding support services, including providing Bidders’ RFI responses and issuing plan, specification, and bid schedule addenda as necessary.
TASK 14 ALLOWANCE FOR ECR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS & RESUBMIT If required, CONSULTANT will prepare an additional updated set of plans, specifications and bid items in standard CITY format in response to the comments received for the 100% submittal. Bid documents will be prepared in MS Word format.
The printing allowance in the budget will be tracked during design, and the actual amount spent on printing will depend on the number of copies the City requests for each submittal.
14.1 Additional Bid PS&E Submittal: CONSULTANT will provide one additional round of edits (at the request of the City) for a back check set. CONSULTANT will issue one final bid set, stamped and wet-signed by the Registered Professional Engineer and Traffic Engineer. The bid set will incorporate the corrections and plan check responses from CITY review.
TASK 15 JDH CORROSION SYSTEM CHECKOUT
15.1 Corrosion System Checkout: CONSULTANT’s subconsultant will provide on-site installation assistance during construction to ensure that the specified systems are installed correctly. The subconsultant will provide assistance with materials procurement if needed and with exothermic welding procedures as well. The subconsultant will perform a system checkout following installation and prepare a checkout report that contains the base line potentials for the subject buried water mains and fittings (i.e. “On” and “Off” potential measurements). The subconsultant will provide a checkout report and Letter of Certification following the final system checkout certifying that the subject corrosion control systems have been designed and installed in accordance with NACE and Local Water District Corrosion Control Standards. This letter will be signed and stamped by a licensed Corrosion Engineer.
TASK 16 PRINTING & EXPENSES
16.1 Printing & Expenses: CONSULTANT will provide print documents as requested by the City, and other various expenses throughout the project.
TASK 17 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS
17.1 Temporary Construction Easements: CONSULTANT will prepare temporary construction easements at the request of the City.
70 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 9 This multi-phase project includes the widening of Dublin Boulevard from four to six travel lanes —three in each direction. Bellecci has been in charge of two phases: the undergrounding of utilities via the Rule 20 process and the roadway widening, sidewalk and associated site improvements. Specific improvements include new bicycle lanes; intersection improvements; a new pedestrian sidewalk over a new pedestrian bridge, landscape improvements, a bus shelter relocation and additional ROW for the new alignment and other improvements.
Dublin Blvd. is a highly traveled road with approximately 33,000 ADT.
Construction: $5M+
Schedule: Completed Summer 2019
Client Reference:
City of Dublin
Michael Boitnott, PE, CIP Manager
925 • 833 • 6630
Dublin Boulevard Widening & Complete Streets (1.9 miles) Bellecci was selected to provide design services for approximately 1.3 miles of pavement improvements which featured cold-in-place recycling (CIR), pavement fabric placement, crack seal. The CIR segments were 4” thick and covered approximately 187k SF. This project was constructed without the need for any RFI’s, which is a testament to the high quality of our surveying and final bid plan set. This project also included ADA ramp construction, PCC curb & gutter removal and replacement, PCC sidewalk removal and replacement, utility cover lowering & restoring to grade, survey monument reinstallation, replacement of traffic loops and/or installation of vehicle detection cameras, striping removal and replacement.
Construction: $1.04M
Schedule: Completed Spring 2019
Client Reference:
City of Pittsburg
Ronald Nevels, Senior Civil*
[email protected]
510 • 981 • 6439
*Now with the City of Berkeley
W. Leland SB-1 Pavement Repair Project (1.3 miles)
Relevant Projects
71 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 10 Relevant Projects
Bellecci designed over a mile of complete streets and pavement rehabilitation on this heavily traveled regional corridor. The project includes Class IV protected bike lanes, new sidewalks, curb, driveway conforms, pedestrian safety improvements and assorted improvements via our On-Call contract with Alameda County. The improvements on E. 14th also features bulb-outs, raised curb medians, and crosswalks. Early in the preliminary design, Bellecci led two public outreach meetings. The community meetings were successful and well attended by the business operators, elected officials representatives and the community.
Construction: $17M
Schedule: Completed Spring 2022
Client Reference:
Alameda County Public Works Agency (ACPWA)
Ms. Amber Lo, PE
510 • 481 • 6963
510 • 670 • 5485
• 1 mi+ pavement rehab on major arterial (former SR)
• ADA ramps/new sidewalks/curb, gutter, medians, driveways • Class IV Bicycle lanes
• Bulbouts
This project involves pavement rehabilitation on Galindo Street, a major high profile City arterial providing access to Downtown, Concord BART Station, and Highway 680 & 242. Rehab options being considered include:
mill and fill, cold-in-place recycling (CIR), or full depth reclamation (FDR). The pavement design requires potholing and utility locating, coordination with utility companies,Other design work includes new curb ramps, protected bike lanes, and traffic signal modifications within the project limits.
Construction: $2.3M (CIP est.)
Schedule: in Design 04/24 (Const. ETA is Spring 2024)
Client Reference:
City of Concord
Justin Gee, PE, Project Manager
925 • 671 • 3284
[email protected]
Galindo Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 2452 • Concord, City of Existing Conditions (Galindo Street)
• 1 mi+ pavement rehab on major arterial
• ADA ramps/sidewalks/curb, gutter, driveways
• Class II Bicycle lanes
• Signal modifications
E. 14th St. Pavement Rehabilitation + Corridor Improvements • Alameda Co. Public Works 72 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 11 Bellecci was selected as the civil engineer for this $25M, high profile complete street and undergrounding project on the busy Mission Blvd. corridor in Alameda County near I-238 & E. 14th Street. Our scope includes creating the PG&E base files, utility letters, JT intent layout + vaults, CAD, PG&E and County coordination. It also included project management for the civil engineering and surveying.
Construction: $25M
Status: Design Complete | UG Utility phase in Const. 01/24 Client Reference:
Alameda County Public Works Agency
(ACPWA)
Ms. Amber Lo, Project Manager
510 • 670 • 5485
Mission Blvd. Rule 20A Project, Phase III (1 mile)
Bellecci has been the lead engineer for several years on this complete streets, pavement rehab, bicycle/pedestrian safety improvement City project. It features a half mile long sidewalk level, separate bike route, a mile of undergrounding, and other complete streets / pavement improvements. We designed green infrastructure and coordinated new lighting. The project added new stormwater treatment/bioretention areas. A traffic signal was upgraded to include bicycle detection, accessible pedestrian signals, and an emergency vehicle preemption system. https://sf.streetsblog.org/2022/05/20/eyes-on-the-street-redwood-city-nl Construction: $8.06M (Complete Streets) | $7.6M (Rule 20) Status: Completed Spring 2021
Client Reference:
City of Redwood City
Mr. Peter Delgado
City Project Manager
650 • 780 • 7373
Middlefield Rd. Pavement Rehabilitation & Half Mile Sidewalk Level Bikeway • Redwood City, City of • 1 mi+ pavement rehab on major arterial
• ADA ramps/new sidewalks/curb, gutter, medians, driveways • Class IV Bicycle lanes (sidewalk level)
• RRFB / Ped safety improvements
• Bulbouts, stormwater planters
Relevant Projects
73 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 12 Bellecci has been working on the design to remove barriers to accessibility in the public ROW in the City in the vicinity of Levi’s Stadium, Great America, and VTA light rail station/s. Improvements are being made to sidewalks, ADA curb ramps, driveways, asphalt repairs, pedestrian street crossings, parking lots, landscape areas, rail crossings, traffic signals, and other miscellaneous barriers. The project is divided into several bid packages (1, 2, and 3).
Construction: $11.4M (all Phases)
Schedule:
Pkg. 1 Completed: 09/22 | Pkg. 2 Completed: 02/23
Pkg. 3 Completed 2023 | Pkg. 4 Substantially Complete Fall 2023 Client Reference:
Vincent Luchessi, PE, Senior Civil Engineer
Public Works Department
408 • 615 • 3012
[email protected] • ADA curb ramps / pedestrian safety on several major arterials • Improving ADA access to Levi stadium, Great America, VTA light rail • Packages 1 & 2 Completed in last 5 years
Public ROW Citywide ADA Improvements • Santa Clara, City of Relevant Projects
Bellecci were the civil engineers and surveyors for this OBAG funded pedestrian and bike safety improvement project. Prospect Road is a major, 4-lane arterial with approx. 20,000 ADT. This project built 16 new landscaped medians with landscaping along 1.9 miles, sidewalk gap closures, new/repaired ADA curb ramps, gutters, utility and drainage improvements, green bike lanes and loops, bus pads in front of Prospect High School, and audible signals at two intersections and pavement rehabilitation.
Construction: $5.5M
Schedule: Completed Fall 2019
Client Reference:
City of Saratoga
Mr. Macedonia Nunez, PE, Project Manager
408 • 868 • 1218
• Pavement rehab on major arterial (near Campbell/Hamilton) • ADA ramps/sidewalk repair-gaps/curb, gutter, medians
• Class II Bicycle lanes
• City of San Jose Encroachment Permit
• Signal modifications at 3 intersections
Saratoga/Prospect Rd. Corridor Improvements • Saratoga, City of 74 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 13 Key Staff Resumes
Daniel Leary, PE, PTOE, QSD, MBA
Principal Engineer II
27 years experience • 25 years with Bellecci
MBA: Cal State Hayward, Hayward, CA
BSCE: Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
PE: CA 48394
PTOE: 3935
QSD/P: 24867
Daniel is know for his ability to skillfully implement CIP projects, from the grant/conceptual phase, through construction completion. He excels at managing straight forward, as well as very complex, multi-discipline projects with construction values up to $15M. Of most relevance to this contract, he has managed several different roadway and bicycle improvement projects for Alameda Co. Public Works (ACPWA) over the past three years and has managed multiple City of Pittsburg projects. He is a leader in streetscape and complete streets civil design and is a member of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP).
E. 14th Street - Complete Streets • Alameda County Public Works $18M Project Manager: Project to create Class IV bike lanes, widen sidewalks, enhanced crosswalks, bulb-outs, and undergrounding of all utilities. Also included are street tree plantings, improved medians, decorative pavers, and decorative streetlights for Ph. II which includes SR 185.
Stanton Ave. Complete Streets • Alameda County Public Works $6M Project Manager: To prepare PS&E for new / replacement sidewalks, curb/gutter, driveway conforms, new ADA curb ramps, retaining wall improvements, tree planting, storm water area planting, C.3 and pedestrian access enhancements - including RRFB improvements at mid-block crosswalks for Ph. I & II.
Burlingame Ave. Streetscape • City of Burlingame $15.9M Project Manager: Bulbouts, widened sidewalks, ADA ramps, new pavement, pavers, rain gardens, downtown business district coordination, parking stalls, bulbouts, crosswalks, drainage. (APWA Silicon Valley Chapter Project of Year - 2015)
Third Street Bicycle Corridor| Complete Streets • City of Davis $3.5M Project Manager: Downtown gateway to UC Davis. Permeable pavers, urban rain gardens, bioswales, bulbouts, ADA curb ramps, storm drain, sewer, water, gas, joint trench, sidewalks, and drainage.
Middlefield Road Corridor Improvements • City of Redwood City $15.6M Project Manager: Streetscape, Rule 20, pedestrian, bike safety, County coordination, New wider sidewalks, paver crosswalk,bioswale treatment, pedestrian safety, Class IV bike lanes.
Saratoga Ave. Complete Streets • City of Saratoga $4.5M Project Manager: 1.9 mi of ped/bike safety - including Class II buffered bike lanes, 6500’ of new medians, ADA curb, gutter, walk, bike lanes, drainage, utilities, bus stop, and proposed RRFB.
Mission Blvd. • Alameda County Rule 20, Ph. III $20M
Principal in Charge: Project on a busy county corridor that connects I-238 and E.14th St. Scope includes PG&E base files, utility letters, JT Intent layouts, vaults, CAD, PG&E/ county coordination, he also provided project management assistance.
Project Duties
• City Procedures & QC
• Invoicing & Project Management
• Resource for Survey & Design
• Transportation Design Expertise
• East County Knowledge
• Alternate Contact with City
75 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 14 Anoop Admal, PE, LSIT, QSD, MSCE
Professional Engineer III
19 years experience • 18 years with Bellecci
MSCE: University of Memphis, Memphis, TN
BSCE: Osmania University, Hyderabad, India
PE: CA 76008
LSIT: CA 8256
QSD/P: 23976
Anoop will serve as the Team Leader for this project. Anoop is Bellecci’s in-house expert on a wide range of CIP categories including complete streets, SRTS, and waterline and sanitary sewer projects. He has worked on several local projects including taking the lead on updating of the Standard Specifications for the City of Pittsburg. He is extremely organized and known for his attention to detail and high quality plans. Anoop has exceptional relevant experience for similar local roadway corridor improvement projects for local Cities and Alameda County.
E. 14th Street - Complete Streets • Alameda County Public Works $18M Project Engineer: Project to widen sidewalks, enhanced crosswalks, bulb-outs, and undergrounding of all utilities. Also included are street tree plantings, improved medians, decorative pavers, and decorative streetlights for Ph. II which includes SR 185.
Middlefield Road Corridor Improvements • City of Redwood City $15.6M Project Manager: Streetscape, Rule 20, pedestrian, bike safety, County coordination, New wider sidewalks, paver crosswalk,bioswale treatment, pedestrian safety, Class IV bike lanes.
Avenues 3–1 Sewer & Water • City of San Bruno $8M
Project Manager: Design services, and obtained a Caltrans Encroachment Permit for the portion of the work on El Camino Real (SR 82) for sewer rehabilitation for 6”, 8”, and 14” (7,110 LF)and water main replacements. The water improvements on this project consist of 7,920 feet of ne 8” diameter water pipeline.
Burlingame Ave. Streetscape • City of Burlingame $15.9M Project Engineer: Bulbouts, widened sidewalks, ADA ramps, new pavement, pavers, rain gardens, downtown business district coordination, parking stalls, bulbouts, crosswalks, drainage. (APWA Silicon Valley Chapter Project of Year - 2015)
2019 Water Main Replacements • City of Sunnyvale $6M
Project Manager: Design to replace approximately 13,750 LF of water mains citywide. Work includes valves and fire hydrants, and replacement of Fire service laterals, tie-in of new mains to existing mains, service laterals up to existing water meters and replace non-radio-read water meters.
Downtown Streetscape Ph. I-III • City of Vallejo $4M
Professional Engineer: 10+ blocks, intersection, signal, new sidewalks, ADA curb, pavement, and rain garden.
Mission Blvd. Rule 20, Ph. III • Alameda County $20M
Professional Engineer: Project on a busy county corridor that connects I-238 and E.14th St. Scope includes PG&E base files, utility letters, JT Intent layouts, vaults, CAD, PG&E/ county coordination, and he provided project management assistance.
Willie Stargell / Webster St. (SR 260) • City of Alameda $8M Professional Engineer: Class I Bike Lanes, New Sidewalks,New Roadway, Caltrans Signal, ROW, Utilities, Coordination with College of Alameda.
Saratoga Ave. Complete Streets • City of Saratoga $4.5M Project Engineer: 1.9 mi of ped/bike safety - including Class II buffered bike lanes, 6500’ of new medians, ADA curb, gutter, walk, bike lanes, drainage, utilities, bus stop, and proposed RRFB.
Project Duties
• Primary Contact with City
• Design Team Leader
• Attend Utility Coordination Meetings
• Schedule & Budget
• Regular Meetings with Designers
• Stakeholder Meetings
• Oversee Creation of PS&E
• Subconsultant Coordination
Key Staff Resumes
76 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 15 Amy Yang, PE, MSCE, PMP
Professional Engineer I, Associate
6.5 years experience • 6.5 years with Bellecci
MSCE: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
BSCE: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
PE: CA 90849
Amy is an extremely valuable employee of the firm who is one of the smartest engineers hired by the firm. She passed her P.E. exam faster than most in Bellecci’s 40+ year history. In addition to her extreme intelligence, Amy has demonstrated exceptional leadership and earned professional development achievements which led to her being promoted to a firm Associate in 2021. Amy is the 1st Bellecci employee to earn a PMP which certifies her as a project management expert. Amy also has an abundance of relevant design experience in the preparation of construction documents for complete streets, major utility improvements, ADA curbs, gutter, sidewalks, pedestrian / bicycle safety facilities, and pavement rehabilitation projects. She has advanced Excel skills which she used to create a custom formula for a spreadsheet to help automate a previously time consuming, manual data gathering task for an undergrounding of overhead utilities (Rule 20) project.
Correas Street Rule 20 • City of Half Moon Bay $1.5M
Project Engineer: Rule 20 project to Bellecci has been the lead engineer since 2016 on the project to underground the overhead utilities in front of the new library. Improvements include new street lights, curb, gutter, sidewalks, underground substructure, and preparation of the JT composite drawings. Bellecci has also led coordination meetings with representatives from PG&E, AT&T, Comcast, the Architect, and the City. Intent Drawing, UUD Boundary, Program Management, Composite Drawings, Form B.
Middlefield Road Streetscape & UUD • City of Redwood City $10.5M Project Engineer: Streetscape, Rule 20, pedestrian, bike safety, County coordination, New wider sidewalks, paver crosswalk,bioswale treatment, pedestrian safety, Class IV bike lanes.
Antoniette Rule 20 • City of South San Francisco $2M est.
Project Engineer: Rule 20 project to undergrounding the overhead utilities of this area adjoining the Centennial Trail, a public recreation area, and fronting the planned Civic Center Campus, a civic area.
Mission Road Rule 20 • City of South San Francisco $TBD Project Engineer: New 2019 Rule 20 project to commence in phases. Project will underground overhead utilities in this UUD district near the South SF BART Station. She will be working on the creation of design, JT Layout, JT Staging Plans, and CAD files for PG&E.
Mission Blvd. • Alameda County Rule 20, Ph. III $15M
Professional Engineer: Project on a busy county corridor that connects I-238 and E.14th St. Scope includes PG&E base files, utility letters, JT Intent layouts, vaults, CAD, PG&E/ county coordination — she also provided project management assistance.
E. 14th Street - Complete Streets • Alameda County Public Works $16M Professional Engineer: Project to widen sidewalks, enhanced crosswalks, bulb-outs, and undergrounding of all utilities. Also included are street tree plantings, improved medians, decorative pavers, and decorative streetlights for Ph. II which includes SR 185.
Project Duties
• Drafting
• Street Layout
• Design of Wet Utilities
• Plan & Profiles
• Technical/Administrative Assistance
Key Staff Resumes
77 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 16 Robert Broestl, PE
QA/QC, Principal Engineer II
30+ years experience • 18 years with Bellecci
BSCE: Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
PE: CA 41828
Robert is one of Bellecci’s proposed Project Managers for this contract. He has been providing engineering services to the City of Oakley, off and on, since it was first incorporated as a City in 1999. In his 14+ year with Bellecci, Robert has worked on a handful of Oakley projects including six years of annual Citywide Street Sign Replacements, a 2013 sidewalk gap closure project, Cypress Pavement Rehabilitation, and several other sidewalk gap closure projects. He has worked well with City engineering staff and has delivered successful projects. His most relevant local knowledge for this contract includes managing engineering design projects for the Cities of Brentwood and Pittsburg, as well as the Delta Diablo Sanitation District.
On-Call Projects (Design/CM) • City of Oakley
Project Manager: Has provided civil design, and/or project management services for the Annual Citywide Street Sign Inventory, sidewalk gap closure project (2007, 2009, and 2013), and the Cypress Pavement Repair. His experience includes two previous projects on E. Blithedale Avenue On-Call Projects (Design/CM) • City of Millbrae
Project Manager: Has provided civil design, and/or project management services for 30+On-Call projects since 2006. Projects have included ADA curbs, pavement repair/rehab; sewer rehab; water mains, trash capture, retaining walls, slope stabilization, and SRTS improvements.
Belmont Pavement Rehab • City of Belmont $800k
Project Manager: Federally funded pavement/utility improvement project. The project reconstructed portions of Notre Dame Avenue and Cipriani Boulevard. Scope of work included creating one bid package for the road reconstruction project and a second bid package for the sewer and storm drain work. This project received a 2016 award from the APWA Silicon Valley chapter.
On-Call Projects (Design/CM) • City of Concord
Project Manager: Has provided civil design, and/or project/construction management services for 17 On-Call projects since 2006. Projects have included ADA curbs and new sidewalk, pavement repair/rehabilitation, bank stabilization, parks and Class I trails, traffic signals, and storm drainage.
Dublin Boulevard Widening & Complete Streets • City of Dublin $5M+ Project Manager: Widen this congested road with new Class II bike lanes (1.9 miles), intersection improvements, ROW acquisition, parking lot mods, new path, Section 4(f) clearance, extensive business coordination.
2017 Pavement Maintenance Project Design • City of Hercules $814k Project / Construction Manager: Managed design and CM/ inspection services for this pavement maintenance project. The repairs include asphalt concrete base repairs, crack sealing, slurry seal surfacing, striping removal and replacement estimated to take 40 days to complete.
Decoto Green Streets LID Project • City of Union City $1.4M Project Manager: LID demonstration project. PM for Phase I and Phase II that has been completed.
Stormwater “Rain Gardens”, green landscape improvements, new ADA curb ramps, drainage, striping, and permeable paver parking stalls.
Project Duties
• QA/QC
• Pavement Rehab Expertise
• Review of Plans
• Review of Technical Specifications
Key Staff Resumes
78 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 17 Emma Schoenthal, EIT
Engineer III, Associate
5.5 years experience • 5.5 years with Bellecci
BSCE: University of California, San Diego Environmental Engineering Emma is a self starter who graduated summa cum laude with a 3.95 GPA from a prestigious University of California school. She was awarded the “Highest Academic Achievement in Environmental Engineering” and earned the John E. Starrett Memorial Scholarship award. Her software experience includes AutoCAD, MATLAB, Solidworks, 3D Printing and programming for PTC Mathcad and Python. We are thrilled that Emma decided to join our new generation of outstanding academic achievers.
Bike Boulevard • City of Cupertino $1.38M
Project Engineer: A project that will construct Improvements at nine different City locations included: new Class II bike lanes, bicycle slip‐lane improvements, striping, signage, intersection bulb‐outs, raised crosswalks, accessible curb ramps, speed table and wall improvements.
Stevens Creek Blvd. Bike Lanes • City of Cupertino $921k Project Engineer: A project that will construct Improvements for a major regional arterial road including new Class IV bike lanes, intersection bulb‐outs and curb returns, curb ramps, raised buffer island, and signal modifications at three intersections.
E. 5th| Vecino Ped. Safety • City of Benicia $458k
Project Engineer: This Federally Funded HSIP Project will construct new sidewalk and retaining wall terminating at the I-780 WB off ramp. Two new street lights, a bulb-out with a pedestrian hybrid beacon, striping, and ADA curb ramps at the I-780 on and off ramps are included.
The project will require an encroachment permit from Caltrans.
Stanton Ave. Complete Street Ph. II • Alameda County Public Works $6M Project Engineer: Design services to prepare PS&E for new and replacement sidewalks, curb/ gutter, conforms at existing driveways, new ADA curb ramps, retaining wall improvements, tree planting, storm water area planting, storm water quality (C.3) enhancements and pedestrian access enhancements; including RRFB improvements at mid-block crosswalks.
E. 14th St. Corridor Improvements - Ph. II • Alameda Coounty Public Works $18M Project Engineer: Project to widen sidewalks, enhanced crosswalks, bulb-outs, an undergrounding of all utilities. Also included are street tree plantings, improved medians, decorative pavers, and decorative streetlights.
Middlefield Rd. Rule 20 Project • City of Redwood City $9M Project Engineer: The project is a mile of undergrounding and the construction cost estimate for the composite drawings Bellecci has led 28 coordination meetings with representatives from PG&E, AT&T, Comcast, Astound, and the City of Redwood City. She also assisted with the review and preparation of the project specifications.
Project Duties
• Design and Drafting of PS&E
• Grading and Drainage Plans
• Coordination with Traffic Consultant &
Landscape Architect
Key Staff Resumes
79 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 18 Anthony Nguyen, EIT
Engineer II
6 years experience • 6 years with Bellecci
BSCE: San Jose State University
Anthony brings a great can-do attitude combined with an engineer’s natural problem solving abilities. While earning his degree in Civil Engineering, he interned at San Jose Mineta Airport where he assisted with updating maps for SJC using ESRI Arc GIS and AutoCAD. He also interned with the City of Campbell’s Engineering Department and used AutoCAD to create striping plans for street improvement projects. Other experience he gained included working on an application for a street improvement project that earned a Greenroads Silver Certification, and assisted the Land Development Department by working on an update of the City wide GIS Storm Drain Systems mapping.
E. 14th St. Corridor Improvements - Ph. II • Alameda County Public Works $18M Project Engineer: Project to widen sidewalks, enhanced crosswalks, bulb-outs, and undergrounding of all utilities. Also included are street tree plantings, improved medians, decorative pavers, and decorative streetlights.
Stanton Ave. Complete Street Ph. II • Alameda County Public Works $6M Project Engineer: Design services to prepare PS&E for new and replacement sidewalks, curb/ gutter, conforms at existing driveways, new ADA curb ramps, retaining wall improvements, tree planting, storm water area planting, storm water quality (C.3) enhancements and pedestrian access enhancements; including RRFB improvements at mid-block crosswalks.
E. 5th| Vecino Ped. Safety • City of Benicia $458k
Project Engineer: This Federally Funded HSIP Project will construct new sidewalk and retaining wall terminating at the I-780 WB off ramp. Two new street lights, a bulb-out with a pedestrian hybrid beacon, striping, and ADA curb ramps at the I-780 on and off ramps are included. The project will require an encroachment permit from Caltrans.
Third Street Bicycle Corridor| Complete Streets • City of Davis $3.5M Project Engineer: Downtown gateway to UC Davis. Permeable pavers, urban rain gardens, bioswales, bulbouts, ADA curb ramps, storm drain, sewer, water, gas, joint trench, sidewalks, and drainage.
Antoniette Rule 20 • City of South San Francisco $2M est.
Project Engineer: Rule 20 project to undergrounding the overhead utilities of this area adjoining the Centennial Trail, a public recreation area, and fronting the planned Civic Center Campus, a civic area.
Mission Road Rule 20 • City of South San Francisco $6M* Project Engineer: New 2019 Rule 20 project to commence in phases. Project will underground overhead utilities in this UUD district near the South SF BART Station. He will be working on the creation of design, JT Layout, JT Staging Plans, and the CAD files for PG&E *Total est. project to be phased
Project Duties
• Design and Drafting of PS&E
• Drainage Profile
• Culvert Crossing Design
• Civil Details
• Coordination with Potholing Contractor
Key Staff Resumes
80 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 19 Project Duties
• Design of Improvements
• Demolition Plans
• Improvement Plans
• Signing/Striping Plans
Edmond Tsui, EIT
Assistant Engineer II
4 years experience • 3 years with Bellecci
BSCE: San Jose State University, San Jose, CA
Edmond’s background includes his role a direct hire Engineering Technician for the City of Palo Alto. In his role with the City, he performed GIS map and database updates, collected GPS field data, worked on layout for water services using AutoCAD Map Civil 3D. He is familiar with local conditions from his design work on CIP projects for other Silicon Valley Cities, and from when he worked for the City of Palo Alto and Edmond has experience with utility design projects for Cities, Counties, and other agencies in the SF Bay Area. Below is a representative sampling of his most relevant experience. Of most relevance to this contract, Edmond has worked on Patterson’s Pedestrian Controlled Crosswalk Safety Project.
Pavement /Street Improvements Projects
• Pedestrian Controlled Crosswalk Safety Project • City of Patterson • $725k • Peery Park Transportation Improve. • City of Sunnyvale • $4.2M • Mission Blvd. Class IV/Complete Streets • Alameda Co. PW • $25M • East Cypress Rd. Pavement + Widening • City of Oakley • $7.8M • 2022 Street Resurfacing Project • City of Milpitas
• Slurry Seal Package 2-A • San Mateo, City of • $2.87M (low bid) • Diablo-DeAnza Corridor + Pavement Rehab • City of Novato • $874k • Downtown Bike/Pedestrian Improvements • Concord • $3.8M • Contra Costa Blvd./Taylor Buff. Bike Lanes & Complete Streets Utilities
• 2019–20 Citywide Waterline Improvements • City of Sunnyvale • $6.09M • W. Olive Ave. Waterline Replacement Project • City of Sunnyvale • Avenues 3-1 Water Main & Sewer Improvements • City of San Bruno • $9.4M • E. Cypress 14” Sewer Force Main • City of Oakley
• E. Cypress Corridor Improvements + Utilities • City of Oakley Key Staff Resumes
81 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 20 Project Duties
• Base Mapping / Drafting
• Street Layout
• Utility Coordination
• Notification to Utility Co’s
• Specifications
• Technical/Admin. Assistance
Isaias Mata, EIT
Assistant Engineer I
2 years experience • 2 years with Bellecci
Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis Isaias is another gifted engineer who has joined the Bellecci family. He became an engineer to make a positive impact on people and society. While working at Bellecci, he provided AutoCAD work on the 12,000+ LF 2019 City of Sunnyvale Citywide Water Main Improvement project. Of most relevance to this contract, he has worked on several recent pavement maintenance / rehabilitation projects.
Pavement /Street Improvements Projects
• Peery Park Transportation Improve. • City of Sunnyvale • $4.2M • Mission Blvd. Class IV/Complete Streets • Alameda Co. PW • $25M • 2022 Street Resurfacing Project • City of Milpitas
• Slurry Seal Package 2-A • San Mateo, City of • $2.87M (low bid) • PTAP-22 Non-Pavement Asset Inventory • Albany, City of • 2022 Street Resurfacing Project • Milpitas, City of • $6.8M est.
Utilities
• 2019–20 Citywide Waterline Improvements • City of Sunnyvale • $6.09M • Ave. 3-1 Water & Sewer Improvements • City of San Bruno • $9.4M Key Staff Resumes
82 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 21 Project Duties
• Survey Manager
• Manage & Schedule Survey Crew
• Oversee basemap development
• Resolved Field Survey Data
• Locate Property Lines
• Records Search
• Topographic survey of collected
field data
• QA/ QC
Alexander Fong, PLS
Professional Land Surveyor
LS License: CA 9252
32 Years Experience / 32 Years with Bellecci
Alexander is a Professional Land Surveyor with three decades of broad experience in boundary resolution, topography, GPS control and construction surveying. Alexander has been in-charge of the union field survey crews and has been the primary surveyor preparing all of Bellecci’s survey maps. He is well known in the industry for skillfully coordinating between owners, contractors and builders for deadlines during all phases of the projects; from up-front mapping to final construction staking. Of most relevance to this project, Alex has been the PLS /Survey Manager for a handful of stand alone and design level survey projects in the San Joaquin Valley. He also has local experience from providing the surveying for Patterson’s Pedestrian Controlled Crosswalk Safety Project.
Pavement /Street Improvements/Complete Streets
• Perry Park Transportation Improvements • City of Sunnyvale • $4M • ADA in the ROW Ped. Safety Improve. Ph. 1-III • Santa Clara • $11.4M • Stevens Creek Blvd. Class IV Bikeway • City of Cupertino • $811k • Meadow Ln./Market St. Paving Project • City of Concord • $5M • Concord Measure Q Pavement Rehab • City of Concord • $2.4M • Middlefield Class IV Bikeway/Complete Streets • Redwood City • $8.06M • E. 14th St. Class IV Bikeway/Complete Streets • Alameda Co. PW • $17M • Mission Blvd. Class IV/Complete Streets • Alameda Co. PW • $25M • Saratoga Ave./Prospect Rd. Complete Streets/Medians • Saratoga $4.5M • Stanton Ave. Complete Streets/ Pavement Rehab • Alameda Co. • $6M • Campanile Way Pavement Rehab • UC Berkeley • $1.3M
• Contra Costa Blvd./Taylor Buff. Bike Lanes & Complete Streets • New Railroad Avenue Pavement Rehab. • City of Suisun City • $496k • San Carlos 2021 Pave. Rehab. (C9416-21) • City of San Carlos • $7M • Fremont Ave. CIR Pavement Rehab. • City Los Altos • $1.2M Sewer & Water
• 2019–20 Citywide Waterline Improvements • City of Sunnyvale • $6.09M • 2016–17 Water Line Replacement • City of Sunnyvale • $3.6M • Murphy Ave. Streetscape & Sanitary Sewer • City of Sunnyvale • $4M • Diamond Blvd./Willow Pass Road Sewer Rehabilitation • City of Concord • $771k • Whitman Rd. Sanitary Sewer Improvements • City of Concord • $2.75M • Adobe Creek Sewer Rehab (Direction Drill) • City of Los Altos • $1.21M • 2018 Sanitary Sewer WW0100219/119 • City of Los Altos • $2.1M • Structural Reach CAR A Sewer Replacement • City of Los Altos • $742k • Broadway Water Main Replacement • City of Millbrae • $2.25M • Taylor Blvd. Sewer & Water Realignment • City of Millbrae • $290k est • Hillcrest Basin Sewer Project • City of Millbrae • $1.6M • Landing Lane Sewer & Pavement Project • City of Millbrae • 2013 Street & Sewer Rehabilitation • Mill Valley, City of • 2011 Sewer & Waterline Replacement • Millbrae, City of • Memorial Park Water Treatment Improvements • San Mateo County Parks • Avenues 3-1 Water Main & Sewer Improvements • City of San Bruno • $9.4M • Crystal Springs Ave. / El Camino Real (SR 82) Sewer Improvements • City of San Bruno • E. 14th St. Complete Streets/ Sewer Rehab • Alameda County PW • $17.3M • Third Street Corridor Water & Sewer Mains • City of Davis • $6M • Memorial Stadium Sewer & Water Mains • UC Berkeley
• Haas Business School Expansion Sewer & Water Mains • UC Berkeley • $3.8M • Antoinette Rule 20 • City of South San Francisco • $2M • 2017 Water Main Topo Survey • City of Redwood City
• 2015–16 Water Main Extension • City of Martinez • $2.5M+ • Fairview Waterline CIP # 592-59202 • City of Brentwood Key Staff Resumes
83 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 22 Key Staff Resumes
Daniel Takacs, LSIT
Survey Technician III, Associate
7 Years Experience • 7 Years with Bellecci*
BA: California State University, Chico
Daniel is a graduate of California State University, Chico who studied geography and took coursework in remote sensing, field techniques, water resource policy and planning, and AutoCAD.
His typical survey projects include creation of Topographic Surveys, Legal Descriptions, Plat Maps, Easement Maps, and updates of Final Maps for private development projects. He is proficient in the latest version of AutoCAD and has experience using ArcMap for GIS surveying projects, as well as Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop. Daniel has proven himself to be a dependable surveyor and is a quick learner.
Roads/ Active Transportation
• Santa Clara ADA in the ROW Citywide Imp. • City of Santa Clara • $11M • UVA Creekside (Albany) Record of Survey • UC Berkeley • Laurel Street Record of Survey • City of Los Altos
Utilities
• Whitman Rd. Sanitary Sewer Improvements • City of Concord • $2.75M • Structural Reach Sewer ROW Survey • City of Los Altos Misc. / Other
• CVFPB Levee Parcelization Project • CA Dept of Water Resources (DWR)* • King School Park Play Area Topographic Survey • City of Berkeley Buildings
• Police Headquarters Building Improvements Topo Survey • City of San Pablo • Vandengate Subdivision • Discovery Builders
• North Field Athletic Building Topographic Survey • UC Berkeley Project Duties
• Review all Computations for Survey Plat
& Record Plat Preparation
• Establish & Maintain Client Contacts
• Boundary Analysis Calculations
• Layout of Final Maps
• Assist Land Surveying Manager in
Preparation of Budgets & Schedules
• Prepare Cutsheets Using Field Data
* Includes experience with an affiliated,
but now dissolved DVBE company prior
to joining Bellecci
84 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 23 Organization Chart
TEAM
MPB Design
JDH Corrosion
Weston Heidzig, EIT
Engineer III, Associate
DESIGN
Michael Becker, PE
Senior Project Manager
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
Billilee Saengchalern, PE, TE
Engineering Manager
CITY OF OAKLEY
Michael Freitag
Associate
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
Daniel Leary, PE, PTOE, QSD
Principal Engineer II
DESIGN
Alex Fong, PLS
Survey Manager, Principal
SURVEY
Daniel Takacs, LSIT
Survey Technician II
SURVEY
Field Survey Crew
Local 3 (Central State)
SURVEY
Anoop Admal, PE, LSIT, QSD
Principal Engineer I, Project Manager
DESIGN
Severin Ott, PE, QSP
Professional Engineer III
DESIGN
Anthony Nguyen, EIT
Engineer II
DESIGN
Emma Schoenthal, EIT
Engineer III, Associate
DESIGN
SURVEY DESIGN SUBS
360 Aerial
Gates
Tom Herink
Project Manager
CORROSION
Jeff Conway
Project Manager
AERIAL SURVEY
Project Manager
STRUCTURAL
Structural Engineer
135 additional team members
Sanderson Bellecci Company
Robert Broestl, PE
Principal Engineer II, QA/QC
DESIGN
Bellecci (Civil/Survey)
Edmond Tsui, EIT
Assistant Engineer II
DESIGN
85 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 24 Peter Delgado, Project Manager
City of Redwood City
[email protected]
650 • 780 • 7373
Woodside Road (SR 84) at Middlefield Rd. Improvements
Completed: December 2018
Construction: $1.6M
This project increased pedestrian safety and mobility across this major intersection with State Route 84 (Woodside Road). The scope included reconstructing the roadway intersection, upgrading the traffic signal system at Middlefield Rd., and Woodside Road to incorporate new sidewalks, curb ramps, crosswalks, pedestrian signals, and roadway lighting.
Mr. Macedonia Nunez, Project Manager
City of Saratoga
[email protected]
408 • 868 • 1218
Prospect Rd. / Saratoga Avenue Complete Streets
Completed: Fall 2019
Construction: $4.76M (Engineer’s Estimate)
Bellecci designed new landscaped medians, sidewalk gap closures, new/ repaired ADA curb ramps, gutters, utility and drainage improvements, green bike lanes along 1.9 miles of this major 4-lane arterial with 20,000 ADT. Also included are audible signals and new bus pads in front of Prospect High School.
Prospect Rd. Complete Streets/New Medians • Saratoga, CA Below is a list of some of Bellecci’s current project references. We can provide other references who can attest to our professional qualifications and performance upon request.
Amber Lo, Project Manager
Alameda County Public Works Agency (ACPWA)
[email protected]
510 • 670 • 5485
E. 14th Street Corridor Improvements
Completed In Construction Winter 2021
Construction: $18M
Design for over a mile of complete streets and pavement rehabilitation on Asheville traveled regional corridor. The project includes Class IV protected bike lanes, new sidewalks, curb, driveway conforms, pedestrian safety improvements, and assorted improvements via our On-Call contract with Alameda County. The improvements on E. 14th also features bulb-outs, raised curb medians, and improved sidewalks.
References
86 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 25 Hourly Rate Schedule
14 Consultant Fee Schedule & Reimbursable Expenses
Engineering Services Hourly Billing Rate
Engineering Intern $90
Assistant Engineer I $130
Assistant Engineer II $150
Engineer I $164
Engineer II $174
Engineer III $190
Professional Engineer I $204
Professional Engineer II $210
Professional Engineer III $220
Principal Engineer I $240
Principal Engineer II $270
Land Surveying Services
Safety Monitor/Flag Person $118
Survey Technician I $124
Survey Technician II $150
Survey Technician III (LSIT) $174
Professional Land Surveyor $220
Survey, Chief of Party $174
Survey, Journeyman Rodman $110
Survey, Apprentice I $72
Survey, Apprentice II $84
Survey, Apprentice III $96
Survey, Apprentice IV $108
Drone Photography/Videography $175
Graphic Artist $134
Time & Materials Rate Sheet: Effective Through December 31, 2024 Construction Services Hourly Billing Rate
Resident Engineer $188
Senior Public Works Inspector $174
Public Works Inspector $154
Public Works Inspector Assistant $128
Construction Manager $220
Project Coordinator $124
Administrative $106
Legal & Expert Services
Document Review and Case Meetings $350
Depositions and Trial Testimony $425
Client authorized overtime work will be charged at 135% of the standard hourly rates.
Reimbursable expenses shall include, but are not limited to the following:
In House Printing Bond: $0.25/sf • Mylar: $5/sf
Large Format Color Presentation $2.50/sf
Color Copies: 8.5 x 11” • 11 x 17” $1.00/ea • $1.90/ea
Other Direct Project Expenses cost + 10%
Subcontractors cost + 10%
Outside Printing & Delivery Service cost + 10%
For 2025, a 4% increase from 2023/2024 rates will be applied.
For 2026, a 4% increase from 2025 rates will be applied. $140
87 OAKLEY | East Cypress Rd. Widening: Jersey Island Rd. to Bethel Island Rd. CIP#302 26 Cost Proposal
City of Oakley
Proposal for: CIP 302 - East Cypress Road Widening from Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road ODCs Mark Ups Total
$272 $256 $232 $220 $212 $196 $176 $160 $156 $132 $92 $228 $178 $174 $380 $290 LS Fee LS Fee LS Fee LS Fee LS Fee LS Fee 1 Project Management 12 40 40 92 $21,984 $0 $21,984
2 Supplemental Field Survey (ALW) 4 8 16 28 $8,384 $0 $8,384 3 Biotreatment Areas - details, layout, piping, grading 4 16 20 16 24 10 4 94 $16,456 $0 $16,456 4 Median and Bioretention Planting 0 $0 $32,300 $3,230 $35,530 5 Separate plans for ISD, in the plan set (similar to CIP 247) 4 12 48 40 4 108 $16,800 $0 $16,800 6 Separate plans for DWD, in the plan set (similar to CIP 247) 4 16 62 42 4 128 $20,128 $0 $20,128 7 Corrosion Plans by JDH 0 $0 $12,000 $1,200 $13,200
8 Lighting Relocation at ECR/BIR intersection due to Widening 4 28 32 $6,512 $0 $6,512 9 Coordination with CBG at A St for Utility Redesign 4 40 44 $8,064 $0 $8,064 10 Allow for Structural Engineering 40 40 $6,240 $21,300 $2,130 $29,670 11 ECR 95% Plans, Technical Specifications, and Cost Estimate 2 4 40 78 112 80 24 340 $54,336 $650 $6,000 $150 $680 $61,816 12 ECR Final Design Plans, Technical Specs, and Cost Estimate 2 4 8 24 40 60 40 16 194 $31,856 $500 $4,000 $150 $465 $36,971 13 Bidding support 6 8 36 50 $7,552 $500 $500 $100 $8,652 14 Allow for ECR Additional Comments & Resubmit (if needed) 2 8 12 24 18 64 $11,272 $0 $11,272 15 JDH Corrosion System Checkout 0 $0 $6,500 $650 $7,150 16 Printing & Expenses 0 $0 $1,500 $150 $1,650
17 Temporary Construction Easements (if needed) 8 20 28 $5,304 $5,304 16 70 14 116 40 60 166 40 364 248 52 12 0 28 16 0 1242 $214,888 $1,150 $10,500 $18,500 $32,800 $21,300 $0 $1,800 $8,605 $309,543 Notes:
Distribution of Hours may vary during the performance of the services Billing rates will have 3.5% escalation at each calendar year Traffic EngineeringCorrosionLandscape Arch
Task Task Description
Principal Engineer II
Bellecci, a Sanderson Bellecci Company
Principal Engineer IProfessional Eng IIIProfessional Eng II Prof. Eng I /Traffic Eng
Engineer IIIEngineer IIEngineering TechSurvey Technician III3-person survey crew Total
Hours
Subconsultants
Engineer IAssistant Eng IIAssistant Eng IProfessional Land Surv I2-person survey crew Total Fee
Other
Direct
Costs
Survey Technician II
05/08/2024 - v2
Structural Eng
10% Sub
Mark Up
Total Labor
Costs
Earth CalcJoint Trench
88 STAFF REPORT
City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: May 28, 2024
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Approving the 2024 Engineering Standard Plans and Details for City of Oakley
Background and Analysis
The City of Oakley developed its first edition of Engineering Standard Details in 2016 which set forth the general guidelines and requirements for the design and construction of infrastructure projects in the City including private development work within existing and future right-of-way.
The purpose of these standards was to set a level of quality and consistency in the construction of infrastructure projects. The implementation of standards will increase the longevity and performance of infrastructure improvements and reduce long-term maintenance costs for the City. In addition, the Engineering Standard Details provide guidance and clarity in the construction of projects as well as reducing complications that happen during construction work caused by the lack of such standards in municipalities.
The Engineering Standards should be periodically updated to reflect changes in construction practices, materials, and to add clarifications. The updated 2024 City of Oakley Engineering Standard Details have incorporated the latest version of the State of California Department of Transportation Standards which in turn are following the Federal Highway Administration standards.
The City Engineering Standards work in conjunction with the State of California Department of Transportation standards and specifications. The City references the State standards and makes modifications where appropriate to meet the City’s unique needs. The City standards and specifications focus on items of work that the State does not generally handle, such as local street, park and landscaping, irrigation, utilities, and other municipal unique items.
The Updated 2024 Engineering Standards have revised existing details to all sections to ensure the design and construction of projects in Oakley are following the latest standards.
Approved and
Forwarded to the
City Council
89 STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 2
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US Approval of the updated Engineering Standard details will provide a formal document making it easier for engineers, contractors, and staff to follow during the design and construction of infrastructure for public and private projects.
Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
This item is consistent with the Strategic Plan 27+ Community Health and Safety goals.
Fiscal Impact
There is no direct cost associated with the new standards, as they will be incorporated into project designs by the City of Oakley and the consultants who work on the design of various projects in Oakley. The updated 2024 Engineering Standard Details will have no financial impact on the City budget.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the updated 2024 Engineering Standard Details.
Attachments
1. 2024 Engineering Standard Details
2. Resolution
90 STANDARD
City of Oakley
Public Works & Engineering Department
MAY 2024
PLANS
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
Prepared By:
Volume III
91 Introduction
The City of Oakley presents the third volume of Standard Plans developed by the Public Works and Engineering Department. The City of Oakley has adopted the Caltrans Standard Plans and Contra Costa County Standard Details, but the City of Oakley Standard plans are specific to the City’s public improvements. The City Standard Plans will govern between conflicting details with Caltrans and Contra Costa County standard details.
These drawings shall be used in conjunction with the latest edition of the Caltrans Standard Specifications, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (i.e. “The GREENBOOK”), and project specific City of Oakley Specifications.
All details pertaining to the design of potable water, recycled water, and sanitary sewer systems shall be reviewed and approved by Diablo Water District and Ironhouse Sanitary District respectively.
All curb ramps and accessible routes shall conform to Caltrans Standards, Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG), and Title 24 of the California Building Code.
A hard copy of the City of Oakley Standard Plans is available for purchase at the City of Oakley located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561.
Comments
The City of Oakley is committed to the quality of this publication and desires to correct any errors, omissions, or ambiguities in the next publication of this document. If you have any comments, corrections, or additions you would like to submit for consideration to be included in the next publication, you are encouraged to submit them to:
City of Oakley
Public Works and Engineering Department
3231 Main St.
Oakley, CA 94561
925-625-7037
[email protected]
92 Table of Contents
X-02
X-03
X-04
C-01
C-02
C-03
C-04
C-05
C-06
Concrete Driveway to Sidewalk Reconstruction C-07
HMA Conform Details C-08
Speed Hump C-09
Storm Drain
Curb Drain SD-01
Concrete Valley Gutter SD-02
Pipe Trench Detail SD-03
Pipe Trench Notes SD-04
Manhole / Catch Basin & Valve Box Adjustment SD-05
Standard Manhole SD-06
Manhole Frame and Cover SD-07
Type I Curb Inlet SD-08
Type II Inlet SD-09
Type III Inlet Landscape Area / Park Inlet SD-10
Reticuline Frame & Grate SD-11
Storm Drain Marker SD-12
Electrical
Street Light- Cobra Head Double LED E-01
Street Light- Cobra Head Single LED E-02
Street Light- Decorative Double LED E-03
Street Light- Decorative Single LED E-04
Signal Specifications and Equipment List E-05
X-01
93 Signs
Street Name Sign- Major Street SS-01
Street Name Sign- Minor Street SS-02
Street Name Sign- Location and Mounting SS-03
Landscape
Preferred Tree List L-01
Tree Planting Specifications L-02
Tree Planting L-03
Root Barrier L-04
Shrub Planting L-05
Plant Spacing L-06
Irrigation
Irrigation Equipment List IR-01
Irrigation Electrical Meter Pedestal IR-02
Controller Assembly IR-03
Controller Grounding IR-04
Grounding Rod IR-05
Master Valve IR-06
Flow Sensor IR-07
Trenching IR-08
Thrust Blocks IR-09
Gate Valve (4 inch & larger) IR-10
Gate Valve (3 inch & smaller) IR-11
Quick Coupling Valve IR-12
Valve Box Installation IR-13
Splice Box / Pull Box IR-14
Irrigation Wire Connection IR-15
Remote Control Valve IR-16
Remote Control Valve with Filter Kit IR-17
Pop-up Rotor Head IR-18
Pop-up Spray Head IR-19
Bubbler IR-20
Miscellaneous
Site Amenities M-01
Removable Bollard Park or Trail M-02
Fence- Chain Link M-03
Perimeter Fence M-04
Solid Waste Trash Enclosure M-05
Oak Leaf Anti-Skate Guard M-06
Table of Contents
94 STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
May 2024
NOT TO SCALE
X-01 TYPICAL SECTIONS
MAJOR ROADS
FC = Face of Curb
FOUR LANES
FOUR LANES
112’ R/W
68’
84’
22’
22’ 22’
CL 22’
CL
8’*
8’* 8’*
6’ 8’*
6’ 6’
8’* 6’
8’* 8’*
8’*
2% max
Meandering
Sidewalk
* Min. 6’
* Min. 6’
8’
8’ 8’
12’ 8’
12’
12’
12’
Bike
Lane
Bike
Lane
Bike
Lane
Bike
Lane
14’
14’ 8’ 8’
14’
14’
R/W
FC
FC FC
FC
R/W
2% max
128’ R/W R/W R/W
2% max
2% min
2% min
Meandering
Sidewalk Median
2% max
2% min
2% min
NOTES:
All pavement sections to be determined by
the project soils report and R-value
A
A
A
A
S IX LANES
108’
22’ 22’ CL 8’* 6’ 8’* 8’* 6’ 8’*
* Min. 6’
8’ 12’ 12’ 8’
Bike
Lane
Bike
Lane
14’ 8’ 8’ 14’
FC FC
R/W 152’ R/W R/W
2% max 2% min
Meandering
Sidewalk Median
2% max 2% min
A A
12’ 12’
95 STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
X-02 TYPICAL SECTIONS
RESIDENTIAL
PRIVATE
M I N O R / R E S I D E N T I A L
NOTES:
1. Sidewalk per the approval of the Planning Division
2. Street widths subject to the approval of the
Fire District and Planning Division
FC = Face of Curb
30’ P.A.U.E.
56’ R/W
20’ min.
36’
10’ min.
18’
5’
5’ 5’
5’
5’ 5’
10’ min.
18’
CL
CL
R/W
R/W
FC
FC
FC
FC
R/W
R/W
Sidewalk
Sidewalk
2% max
2% max
2% max
2% max
2% min
2% min
2% min
2% min
1 2
TWO LANE COLLECTOR
76’ R/W
40’
CL
6’ 6’ 6’* 6’
2% max
Sidewalk
6’* 8’
Bike
Lane
Bike
Lane
12’ 12’ 8’ 6’
2’
Main Bike
Buffer Lane
BIKE LANE
6’
R/W
FC FC
R/W
2% max
A
A A
May 2024
Meandering
96 STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE
X-03 STREET END
LAYOUT OPTIONS
Road Type
Residential Street 45’ 55’
Commercial /Industrial Street 55’ 65’
Radius
A B
CUL-DE-SAC
ROW
Face of curb
CL
32’ Radius Min
36’ Min See
Note 1
Notes
1. Minimum roadway widths:
20 ft - no parking
32 ft - parking on one side
36 ft - parking on both sides
2. Cross slope within turnaround
shall not exceed 8% grade.
3. Surface shall be all-weather and capable
of supporting a 37 ton vehicle.
4. Cul-de-Sac shall have standard curb
and gutter, See Std Plan C-01.
5. Standards are minimum City requirements
subject to Fire District approval.
6. No parking signs must be installed
where parking is restricted.
7. Dead-end access roads over 150’ in length shall
comply with ECCCFPD Ordinance 2019-02.
SHUNT
28’ Radius Min
20’ Min
See Note 1 &7
CL
20’
Min
HAMMERHEAD
28’ Radius Min
20’ Min
See Note 1 & 7
CL
75’Min
20’
Min
(Private Only) (Private Only)
A
B
20’
Min
May 2024
97 STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
X-04
DRIVEWAY AND
INTERSECTION
SIGHT TRIANGLES
Notes
1. Foliage at maturity and berm, if any, shall
not exceed 3 feet in height.
2. A visual clearance from the street to 15
feet in height shall be maintained with all
tree foliage within the sight triangle.
3. A visual clearance from the sidewalk to 7
feet in height shall be maintained with all
tree foliage within the sight triangle.
4. Site specific sight triangle exhibit to be
provided upon request by the Public
Works and Engineering Department.
5. Refer to the AASHTO Green Book,
Section 9.5 Intersection Sight Distance,
for additional guidance.
MAJOR STREET WITH STOP CONTROL ON MINOR STREET
Major Road Posted
Speed Limit (MPH)
D Minimum
Distance (ft)*
25 30
35 40
45 *AASHTO Green Book
280
335
390
445
500
Sidewalk
R/W - Property Line 25’ x 25’ Min at
Property Line
Vehicle Typ.
Major Street center line
Minor Street
or
Access Point
Edge of Roadway /
Street
Foliage
15’ Min
D
3’
20’
STOP
D
7’ Min
3’
May 2024
98 STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
C-01 CONCRETE CURB
AND GUTTER
Notes:
1. 2.
3. 4.
6. The finished curb shall immediately be
sprayed with transparent curing compound.
Curb shall be covered by waterproof paper
or plastic membrane in the event of rain or
other unsuitable weather. Curing time shall
be a minimum of 72 hours.
7. 9. Gutter pan slope shall not exceed 5%
at pedestrian curb ramp entry locations.
Contractor shall use 1.2” maximum between
lip of gutter flow line at these locations.
10. All concrete shall be per current Caltrans
Specifications Section 73 “Concrete Curbs and
Sidewalks” and Section 90 “Concrete”. Concrete
pound of liquid lamp black
of concrete. Liquid lamp black
shall include 1
per cubic yard
color shall be “Davis A 8090 Black” or equal.
11. All curb and gutter shall have 2 #4 Rebar the
entire length and embedded on both ends
using dowels (one dowel in the center of the
gutter; one dowel in the center of the curb).
12”
6”
6”
6” 1”
1” Radius 1.5” See Note 9
1” Radius 1/2” Radius
2% Max
CL II AB
3”
6”
3”
12”
18”
8 All curb and gutter shall be placed on a
minimum of 6' Aggregate Base Class II 95%
maximum compaction ASTM D1557 or per
the direction of the City Engineer.
8. #4 Rebar shall be extended along full length
of the curb and gutter with a 2' overlap at
end of rebar. Longitudinal rebar should start
and stop at required expansion joints.
May 2024
All radii less than 100’ shall use flexible wood
or metal forms to eliminate angular points at
10’ section points.
5. 3/4" expansion joints driveway sections, curb
returns, curb ramps, and cold joints or a
maximum of 30' center to center. Expansion
joints shall protrude 1" below the bottom of
the gutter. Slip joint dowels (1/2" x 12") to be
used bridging required expansion joints.
Finished work shall not vary more than
1/8" in grade and 1/4" in alignment.
Saw-cut and remove 18" minimum street
section for curb and gutter installation on
existing streets. Plug 18" AC overcut with a
minimum of 6" thick HMA.
Thru joints shall be placed adjacent to catch
basins, inlets at point s of tangency on
streets, and at alley and driveway returns.
Maximum spacing shall be 30' pre-molded
joint filler, shall be 1/2" wide and conform to
AASHTO design M213. Dummy joints shall
be placed every 10'.
99 STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
C-02 CONCRETE
VERTICAL CURB
Notes:
1. 2.
HMA
#4 Rebar
CL II AB
6”
8”
12”
3” 3”
4”
1/2”
3. 4.
5. May 2024
The construction notes of Standard Plan
C-01 apply to concrete vertical curb.
Median islands shall have 8" vertical
clearance from Top of Curb to Pavement.
Plug 18" AC overcut with a minimum of 6"
thick HMA.
Slip joint dowels (1/2" x 12") to be used
bridging required expansion joints.
Longitudinal rebar should start and stop at
required expansion joints.
100
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
CONCRETE DIVIDER
/ MOWBAND C-03
Notes:
1. SECTION
Compacted subgrade
Concrete with
soft-broom finish
1/2” tooled radius Finish grade of
turf after setting
Bark Mulch
#4 Rebar, centered and
continuous. Overlap
all joints 20” and tie.
6”
12”
3” 3”
2. 3.
4. May 2024
Provide 1/4” wide by 1/2” deep score lines
at 8’-0” O.C. and expansion joints at 32’-0”
O.C.
Slip joint dowels (1/2" x 12") to be used
bridging required expansion joints
Slip joint dowels (1/2" x 12") to be used
bridging required expansion joints.
Longitudinal rebar should start and stop at
required expansion joints.
101
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
MONOLITHIC AND
SEPARATED
C-04
Notes:
1. Sidewalk shall be a minimum of 4”. All concrete
shall be per current Caltrans Specifications
Section 73 “Concrete Curbs and Sidewalks”
and Section 90 “Concrete”. Concrete shall
include 2 pounds of liquid lamp black per
cubic yard of concrete. Liquid lamp black
color shall be “Davis A 8090 Black” or equal.
2. Full Expansion Joints shall be placed to
match those placed in adjacent Curb and
Gutter, with maximum spacing of 30 ft.
3. Native subgrade shall have 90% minimum
compaction and AB subgrade shall have 95%
minimum compaction ASTM D1557 or
per the direction of the City Engineer.
4. Sidewalk shall be at least 6” thick behind
Rolled Curb and Residential Driveways and
8” thick behind Commercial Driveways.
5. The finished sidewalk shall be sprayed with
a transparent curing compound covered by
waterproof paper or plastic sheeting in the
event of rain or other inclement weather; curing
time shall be for a minimum of 72 hours.
TYPICAL SECTION
MONOLITHIC
PLAN VIEW
TYPICAL SECTION
SEPARATED
5’ Min
Planting Strip
Var.
Concrete Curb
and Gutter
See Std.
Plan C-01
Sidewalk when machine poured
monolithic to curb shall be 6” thick
See Note 1
Separated
Monolithic
2- #3 Rebar for the entire
length of section and dowels
embedded 4” into existing
sidewalk on both ends and
extending 8” min. into new
concrete. Expansion joints
shall also be doweled. 4” CLII AB
95% Max Compaction
ASTM D1557
2%
6. All joints shall be cleaned and edged
with an edger having a 1/4” radius.
7. Sidewalk and planter strip widths
shall conform to dimensions shown in
appropriate street cross section details.
8. The width of the sidewalk directly
behind curb without planter shall be a
minimum of 5’ from back of curb.
9. Exposed surfaces shall be a medium broom
finish.
May 2024
102
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
CONCRETE
DRIVEWAY WITH
PLANTER
C-05
Notes:
Equals width of driveway at property
line, 14’ min - 30’ max for residential
and 25’ min - 35’ max for commercial.
1/2” wide full depth expansion joint
Full depth expansion joint if
A is 15’ or greater.
Driveway to be surfaced with
asphalt or concrete.
Driveway concrete shall be a minimum
of 6” thick for residential and 8” thick for
commercial locationsand is to be placed
on a minimum of 6" Class II aggregate
base 95% maximum compaction, ASTM
D1557. Over 95% compacted subgrade.
All concrete shall be per current Caltrans
Specifications Section 73 “Concrete
Curbs and Sidewalks” and Section 90
“Concrete”. Concrete shall include two
(2) pounds of liquid lamp black per cubic
yard of concrete. Liquid lamp black color
shall be “Davis A 8090 Black” or equal.
Sawcut and remove 18” minimum
street section for driveway
in existingstreets. Plug 18"
All work shall conform to current ADA
requirements.
#4 rebar 16” O.C. both ways minimum
3” cover.
4’ min. at 2% for sidewalk transition to
monolithic.
A
A
A
F
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
G
C
C
C
H
D
D
I
J
J
I
E
E
E
CURB TRANSITION
DETAIL
Concrete Sidewalk
See Std Plan C-04
4’ min
Rebar (Not shown)
See
Detail
below
6” to top
of curb
12”
R=30”
Curb & Gutter
See Std Plan C-01
24”
24”
2% Max
2% Max
2% Max
Sidewalk
Planter
5’ Min
11% Max
R=30”
12”
3/4” Lip
installation
May 2024
AC overcut with a minimum of 6" HMA.
Slip joint dowels (1/2" x 12") to be used
at all expansion joints.
103
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE CONCRETE
DRIVEWAY WITHOUT
PLANTER
C-06
Notes:
A
A
A
F
B
B B
B
B
B
G
C
C
H
D
D
D
I
I
E
C U R B T R A N S I T I O N
D E TA I L
Concrete Sidewalk
See Std Plan C-04
Rebar (Not shown)
See
Detail
below
64”
Curb & Gutter
See Std Plan C-01
64” 64”
2% Max
3/4” Lip
May 2024
Equals width of driveway at property line, 14'
min - 30' max for residential and 25' min - 35'
max for commercial.
1/2" wide full depth expansion joint.
Full depth expansion joint if A is 15' or
greater.
Driveway to be surfaced with asphalt or
concrete.
Driveway concrete shall be a minimum of 6"
thick for residential and 8" thick for
commercial locations and is to be placed on
a minimum of 6" Class II aggregate base
95% maximum compaction, ASTM D1557.
Over 95% compacted subgrade.
All concrete shall be per current Caltrans
Specifications Section 73 "Concrete Curbs
and Sidewalks" and Section 90 "Concrete."
Concrete shall include one pound of liquid
lamp black per cubic yard of concrete. Liquid
lamp black color shall be "Davis A 8090
Black" or equal.
Sawcut and remove 18" minimum street
section for driveway installation in
existing streets. Plug 18" AC overcut
with a minimum of 6" thick HMA. Slip
joint dowels (1/2" x 12") to be used at
all expansion joints.
All work shall conform to current ADA
requirements.
#4 rebar 16" O.C. both way minimum
3" cover.
104
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
Saw cut or remove
at joint line
Refer to Std. Plan
C-05 & C-06
Joint Material
Joint Material
Joint Material
Existing road section
4” Concrete
Conc Curb & Gutter
See Std Plan C-01 Undisturbed subgrade or
approved material 95% Max
compaction ASTM D1557
6” CL II AB 95% Max
compaction ASTM D1557
Saw cut or remove
at joint line
Remove Exist Curb, Gutter, and Driveway sections
Joint line or saw cut at lip of gutter
18”
Remove
24”
18”
Deep Lift
6” HMA
2% Max
2%
CONCRETE
DRIVEWAY
TO SIDEWALK
RECONSTRUCTION
C-07
A
B
A
B
SECTION A-A
SECTION B-B
May 2024
Notes:
1. Rebar: #4 @16” O.C. both ways,
Min 3” concrete coverage.
2. 3.
4. 5.
6" Class II AB requirement under
sidewalk.
18" existing AV overcut with 6" HMA
roadway replacement plug (95%).
Slip joint dowels (1/2" x 12") to
be used at all expansion joints.
Saw cut 18" if curb & gutter are
replaced.
105
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
HMA CONFORM
DETAILS C-08
Notes:
1. 2.
3. 4.
Notes:
1. Safety edges shall be used on all roads posted 35 mph or higher with paved shoulders 4’ or less.
2. Construction safety edge in conformance with project special provisions or City of Oakley Public Works Department Standard Provision for Construction.
SAFETY EDGE
PAVEMENT FAILURE
BASE FAILURE REPAIR DETAIL
HMA Overlay
HMA Overlay
HMA Overlay
Cold Plane, or sawcut
HMA and excavate to
a near line See Note 3
HMA = Hot Mix Asphalt
Cold Plane, or sawcut
HMA and excavate to
a near line See Note 3
1.5 x HMA (Exist), Min 0.25’
unless otherwise directed in
construction plans, Special
Provisions, or by the Engineer
2x HMA (Exist), Min 0.5’
unless otherwise directed in
construction plans, Special
Provisions, or by the Engineer
HMA to e placed in 2” lifts Max.
HMA
HMA
AB
AB
Exist / new EP
4’ Min each way
See Note 1
4’ Min each way
See Note 1
65° to 70° (Vert)
5%
Existing AC
Rock Shoulder
CL II AB or Recycled CL II
AB compacted to 95%
Failed Pavement
& Base Section
Failed Pavement
& Base Section
See Note 2
See Note 2
Clear area of all vegetation,
apply pre-emergent
May 2024
Limits of pavement failure repairs and
base failure shall be as marked in the
field by the Engineer / Inspector.
For pavement failure repairs and base
failure repairs re-compact the existing
road base or subgrade to 95%
relatively density prior to placing HMA.
Place asphalt binder on all vertical cut
faces prior to placing HMA.
All sawcuts shall be sealed using
asphalt binder and fine sand. Asphalt
binder (SS1 Tack Oil or equivalent to
be used on all adjacent concrete/AC
vertical and horizontal exposed
edges.
106
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
SPEED HUMP C-09
Notes:
1. Speed Hump must be parabolic
2. Type A HMA AR-4000, max aggregate size 1/2”
3. Grind to key in all edges (1.5” x 12”).
4. Signs shown typical in both directions.
5. Sign post must be galvanized square 2” x 2”
post with 3/8” diameter holes spaced 1” apart.
6. Signs shall be 3M Diamond Grade.
7. All striping shall be thermoplastic paint.
8. Speed Hump installation must adhere to the
Neighborhood Traffic Management Policy.Center Line
Center along travel lane
PLAN VIEW
SECTION
SECTION
1’ space white typ.
1’ white, marking typ.
Grind all edges
30”
14’
Varies
Speed hump (parabolic curve)
Finished grade of
existing pavement See note 3
0” 0.8” 1.5” 2.0” 2.5”
1’ typ
6” 24” taper
12”
Curb face Speed Hump
1.5” See note 3
7’
14’
2.8” 2.9” 3”
8’
50’
30”
30”
30”
18”
18”
May 2024
107
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
CURB DRAIN SD-01
SECTION A-A
4” Concrete
3”
Standard Curb and Gutter See Std
Plan C-01
Flow line
1/2” min
3”
A
A
Top of sidewalk
4” CL II AB
Add 3" x 3" wire mesh requirement over top of 3" drain pipe.
May 2024
Note:
2% max
3" dia pipe, SCH 40 PVC
108
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
SD-02 CONCRETE
VALLEY GUTTER
Notes:
1. Expansion joints with 1/2” x 12” slip.
2. Dowels at 20 foot intervals.
3. All concrete shall be per current Caltrans
Specifications Section 73 “Concrete
Curbs and Sidewalks”
“Concrete”. Concrete
pound of liquid lamp
and
shall
Section 90
include one
per
yard of concrete. Liquid lamp black color
shall be “Davis A 8090 Black or equal.
4. Valley Gutter width must be designed to
meet collect and convey requirements
to meet capacity for storm drain.
6”
6” 1-1/2”
1/4” max
8”
#4 rebar
See Note 4
HMA
4”
CL II AB
95% Max compaction
ASTM D1557
18” min 18” min
Tie #4 longitudinal rebar to slip dowels
at expansion joints.
May 2024
black
109
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
PIPE TRENCH
DETAIL SD-03
Notes:
Saw cut existing pavement
Backfill Bedding Material
Var 8” min or as recommended
by the geotechnical engineer
24’ min
8”
12” 12”
8”
Var
3/4” crushed rock
Pipe spring
line
Pipe OD
12” min
Apply asphalt binder to edge
of existing pavement (typ)
See Note 3. (1/2”
med grade HMA
minimum)
(Class II aggregate
base @95% relative
compaction
minimum)
Control Density Fill
(CDF) or native backfill,
if acceptable, otherwise
CL 2 AB as directed by
City Engineer @90%
relative compaction
minimum
Native or CL 2 AB
@90% relative
compaction, minimum
CL 2 AB or CDF
@95% relative
compaction minimum
4"
May 2024
1. See Standard Plan SD-04 for additional
trench requirements.
2. The 4" HMA minimum shall be placed in two
2" lifts. Thickness of HMA roadway trench
replacement at the discretion of the City
Inspector.
3. Pavement section to match existing or
whichever is greater on collector and arterial
roadways.
4. Residential streets minimum 3" HMA.
5. Roadway utility pipe depths below 10 ft should
require PE stamped structurally shoring, and/or
per existing conditions at the discretion of the
City Engineer.
6. 12" or greater limit of the existing roadway AC
trench overcut at the discretion of the City
Inspector.
6"
110
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
PIPE TRENCH NOTES SD-04
Notes
1. All backfill material shall be placed in lifts
not to exceed 6 inches before compaction
unless authorized by the City Engineer.
2. Mechanical compaction of backfill material shall
not begin until the depth of compacted backfill
material is 2 feet above the top of pipe.
3. Each lift shall be mechanically compacted to the required density prior to placing succeeding lifts of backfill material.
4. Compaction tests shall be as required by the
city construction inspector, but in no case less
than 2 tests every 200 feet of trench.
5. In-place density will be determined by one or more of the following methods.
(A) ASTM D1557, test for density of soil in place by the sand cone method.
(B) ASTM D2922- Nuclear method.
6. Laboratory density will be determined by
ASTM D 1557, Moisture-Density Relations
of soils and soil-aggregate mixtures.
7. If the edge of the trench falls within 3 feet of the gutter, the entire pavement shall be removed to the gutter.
8. On steep slopes, construct clay or concrete dam through the bedding material as determined by the City Engineer.
9. For concrete streets place 6 inches of Class
A Portland Cement Concrete over 6” of Class
2 Aggregate Base for finished surface.
10. All trench construction shall be in compliance
with latest OSHA Standards.
11. Place permanent pavement within 7 days after backfilling.
Temporary cutback allowed for 7 days maximum, prior to
final HMA. Time adjustments per review of the existing
scope of work at the City Inspector's discretion Install hot, temporary Asphalt Concrete (AC) to finish grade until
permanent Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) is placed.
BEDDING MATERIAL
Granular bedding material requirements
Caltrans durability index minimum 30
STRUCTURAL BACKFILL
Structural backfill requirements percent passing
Minimum Sand Equivalent of 20
Sleeve Sizes
1”
3/4”
3/8”
#4
#8
Sleeve Sizes
1-1/2”
3/4”
#4”
#30
#200
Percentage Passing
100
90-100
20-55
0-10
0-5
Percentage Passing
100
80-100
30-60
5-35
0-12
May 2024
12. If existing HMA section is less than 4”, grind
AC to full depth of existing AC and replace
full depth of HMA section (4” minimum).
13. In paved streets, all cuts shall be smooth and vertical with the area being generally rectangular. Native material may be used as backfill if approved by the City Engineer. If sand backfill is used, it must be well graded, tamped with vibratory compactor, if needed.
14. A 6" course of CL II AB and 3" HMA is minimum surface to be restored. No restoration shall be less substantial than existing composition. In cases of concrete streets, a 6" thickness of concrete on a 6" CL II AB is the minimum standard.
15. All storm drain pipes shall be ADS High
Performance Polypropylene (PP) Dual-gasketed wall
pipes or as approved by the City Engineer. Thickness of HMA roadway trench replacement at the discretion of the City Inspector.
111
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
PLAN
Patch area
See Notes 1&2
A A
SD-05
MANHOLE/CATCH
BASIN & VALVE BOX
ADJUSTMENT
Notes
1. Remove pavement and base materials for a
distance which is equal to the diameter of the
frame plus two feet. Adjust casting frame to
new pavement surface using concrete blocks.
3. Single ring of #4 rebar through concrete encasement
for concrete ring within roadway.
4. Top of utility to be level with existing roadway grade. 2”x4”x8” solid brick used for final
MANHOLE & CATCH BASIN
ADJUSTMENT
adjustment
to grade. 6” high maximum.
VALVE BOX ADJUSTMENT
SECTION A-A
Smooth edge Seal
with SSI Typ 12 Outside Dia. 12
Conc. Blocks
Native Soil
Class II AB,
95% Relative
Compaction
4” Min
HMA CL A
OUTSIDE PAVED AREA INSIDE PAVED AREA
12” 12” 6” Conc
Exist
Pvmnt
Seal with
SSI Typ
May 2024
2. 6”
2” min
112
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
SD-06 STANDARD
MANHOLE
Notes
1. Precast Manhole sections shall conform to
applicable provisions of ASTM C478.
2. 5. Manhole base must be poured
against undisturbed soil. If excavated
too deep, fill with concrete.
6. For manhole with large diameter pipes, see
Contra Costa County Standard Plans.
Street surface
Hot Mix Asphalt
See SD-05
Manhole Frame and Cover
See Std Plan SD-07
2” min
4”
4”
8”
3’ min
O.D. Pipe + 2”
4’8”
Precast sections
as required
Mortar all interior and
exterior joint spaces
typ. See Note 4.
Precast base with
integral riser
48”
24” dia.
6” min
Smooth finish
4” min
16” max
May 2024
9" Class II for Aggregate Base bedding
compacted to 95% maximum ASTM D1557
or as required by the Geotechnical
Engineer.
4. Backfill Class II AB around MH to 95%
compaction or CDF fill option if width is
too narrow between existing native and
MH exterior walls as required by the City
Inspector.
3. All joints with External Concrete Joint
Wrap.Two layers may be required to seal
base; plaster with mortar thereafter.
113
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
SD-07 MANHOLE FRAME
AND COVER
Manufacturer’s
Name Optional
Label “STORM”
or “SEWER”
Pick hole
PLAN
Top of pattern
and letters
1/4”
1/2”
3/16”
DIAMOND COVER
PATTERN DETAIL
26-3/4”
25-1/4”
1” 1”
6” 5/8”
3/4”
23-3/4”
34-1/8”
SECTION A-A
Pick holes
1-1/8”
8 webs
1/2” thick
A A
May 2024
114
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
TYPE 1 CURB INLET SD-08
Notes:
1. Conc
Bicycle Safe Grate
Frame and Grate
2” x 3/16” Reticuline Bars
Typ See Std Plan SD-11
A
A
B B
PLAN
2 1/2” X 2 1/2” X 2 1/2” X 4’0”
4 3/4” X 3 1/2” Sq.
Head Bolts at 14”
1-1/2”
Metal shall be Galv
ANGLE ANCHOR
#4 @ 10” O.C.
both ways typ
Hook sideways
9”
1’6”
No. 4
FCFace of curb
1 1/2” clear
SECTION B-B
Conform to gutter or
roadway section unless
depression is called for.
Height Var
Var to match adjacent
curb type
1 1/2” Clear
#4 @ 10” O.C.
both ways typ
12”
6” 6” 6” 6”
6”
6”
3’0” 3’0”
4:1
1 1/2” clear
SECTION A-A
May 2024
Where inlet is located within a return,
angle anchor shall be curved to match
face of curb radius.
2. When H exceeds6'-0", to us a manhole
base with Type "A" inlet top and
transition slab.
3. Mortar all interior and exterior joint
spaces, pipe access, and flush.
Accessing utility pipes to be cut flush
with interior of inlet walls.
4. See SD-06 Note 4.
Notes:
5. Water stop/gasket at the discretion
of the City Engineer.
115
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
TYPE II INLET SD-09
Bicycle Safe Grate
Frame and Grate
2” x 3/16” Reticuline Bars
Typ See Std Plan SD-11
Frame to be
anchored to
concrete per
manufacturer’s
specifications
#4 @ 10” O.C.
both ways typ
#4 @ 10” O.C.
both ways typ
4”
Var
Var
1 1/2” Clear
1 1/2” Clear
1” min6” max
6”
4:1
Concrete
Concrete
A A
B
B
PLAN
SECTION A-A
SECTION B-B
6” 6” 2’0”
3’0”
6” 6” 3’0”
4’0”
May 2024May 2024
Notes:
See Notes on SD-08.
116
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
SD-10 TYPE III LANDSCAPE
AREA INLET
Notes
basin, per plan.
Grate and frame with grate
locking device, per plan.
Finish grade, flush with top of grate
Storm drain pipe, per plan.
Grout pipe in place. 1 sack
sand-cement slurry
Pipe openings to be cast into concrete
Reinforcement per Manufacturer
Aggregate base, Class II, 12” deep x basin
width. Compact to 95% relativity density.
Subgrade, compacted to
90% relative density.
BASIN DETAIL
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
At planting areas, 18” wide filter fabric
wrapped around and glued at edges
to structure where weep holes occur.
At planting areas, 2” weep
holes at 10” O.C.
Invert elevation, per plan.
Where weep holes occur surround
catch basin with drain
diameter max size,
rock, 3/4”
Finish surface, where paving occurs.
CL
As Required
6”
12”
3” min 24” x 24”
12”
4:1
May 2024
Precast concrete See Note 4
SD-06.
compacted as
recommended by the Geotechnical Engineer.
117
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
SD-11 RETICULINE
FRAME & GRATE
Notes
1. Hinged grate only when specified.
2. Place grate bars parallel to flow.
3. Frame, grate, and anchors shall
be galvanized after fabrication
FRAME
SECTION B-B
SECTION A-A
GRATE
3/4” Fillet
weld full
depth each
side on the
outside of
bearing
bar and
every other
internal bar.
2’1”
1/4”
4” x 3-1/4”
2’
3-1/2” x 1/4” x 3’4-7/8” bar
3/8” dia. rivets
on 5” centers
2” x 3/16”
reticuline
bars- top
flush
4” X 1/4”
Bearing Bars
typ10 bars
for 24” grate
3” x 1/4” end
bar- top flush
3” x 1/4” end band
3/16”
3’5-3/8”
3’4”
5”
4. Frame and grate to be welded
steel or approved alternative.
B B
A
A
3”
4”
3”
3-1/2”
2’
4”6”
4” 1’5” 4”
1/2” anchors
2”
3/16”
L 4” x 3” x 1/4”
1/4” 1/2”
3-1/2”
1/4”
1’11-5/8”
1’11-1/8” 1/4”
May 2024
118
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
SD-12 STORM DRAIN
MARKER
Notes
1. Available for purchase at the City of
Oakley Public Works Department
2. Storm Drain marker by Almetek,
Item No. STDM-9599-SSP.
3. Sub-surface installation
with tube adhesive
4. Wire brush surface, blow dust,
apply adhesive press down.
Hardware
• SIKS_ADH
Sikaflex 10.1 fl. oz. caulk tube
(1 Tube per 15 markers)
• CDB4
Carbide drill bit
• DCG
Dripless caulking gun
TOP VIEW
SIDE VIEW
0.187”
Drilled 1/2” down
and embed marker Center pilot hole Tube adhesive applied on back of marker
Clear Sealer
Corner Radius 0.187”
Embossing height 0.040”
4”
May 2024
119
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
SD-13 FLUSH TRENCH
PLATE
FLUSH TRENCH PLATE
Open trench
Fill void between saw cut and
plate with cold mix AC
Roadway surface
Flush with
roadway surface
Steel trench plate
Pin plate upon
direction of the
City Inspector
6” 6”
6” min 6” min
6” min
Notes
1. Contractor shall install signs per current MUTCD requirements for uneven pavement.
2. If trench plates cannot sit completely flush due to crowns, quarter crowns, or uneven pavement an AC transition will be required. The transition shall be a minimum 3 feet horizontal for every inch vertical on arterials and 1 foot horizontal for every inch vertical on residential streets.
May 2024
120
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
STREET LIGHT
COBRA HEAD
DOUBLE L.E.D.
E-01
Notes
1. Pole Specifications:
HAPCO Round Tapered Spun
Aluminum Pole or approved
equal. Model No.
RTA316D8C4M2C-01 Arm
length shall be 12 feet unless
noted on the plans. Length may
vary based on location and
street type.
Fixture Specifications:
LED Fixture by CREE or approved equal.
Model No. XSPPSM-D-HT-2ME-8L-40K7-
UL-SV-N-Q4 56W for major streets
(arterial / collector)
29W for local streets
(residential).
2. Foundation Specifications: Class "A"
Concrete Field
Cast 4,500 PSI minimum.
3. Verify anchor bolt design and bolt circle
with manufacturer. Rebar cage per
Caltrans ES-7N or design foundation
for 100 mph wind loading.
4. (4) 1”x40”- 8NC Galv. Stl. Anchor Bolts,
AASHTO M314-90 Grade 55, 10” Of
Threaded End Galv.
Per ASTM A153.
Minumum anchor bolt
embedment depth shall be 32 inches.
(4) 1”-8NC Galv. Stl. Hex Nuts
(4) 1” Galv. Stl. Lock Washers
(4) 1” Galv. Stl. Flat Washers
5. A 6” wide minimum concrete
pad around the base of the light pole
must be provided.
ELEVATION
29’6”
6”
CL
See Note 1
See Note 2
Fixture by
others
2’6”
Rise
2 3/8” O.D.
1’6”
5’0”
30” dia
See Note 3
See Note 5
2” SCH 40 PVC
15’ - #6 Bare CU. Grd. Wire,
secure to Electrolier Grd.
Stud cover with 2” of soil
prior to pouring base or 5/8”
x 10’ copper Weld Grd. Rod
HAPCO
Cast Alum. Base Flange
(44207) w/ bolt covers and
stainless steel hex hd screws
Frame tapped 3/8”-
16NC for grounding
Tapered Alum. Tube .188”
Wall Alloy 6063-T6
Tapered Alum. Tube (4”
O.D.)
.125” Wall Alloy (6063-16)
2 1/2” x 5 1/8”
Elliptical Section
Wire hole w/ 1” I.D.
Alloy 6063-T6 w/ 1/2”-13NC
Stainless Steel Hardware
HAPCO Rounded Tapered
Spun Aluminum Pole
or approved equal
Alum. pole cap
w/ stainless
steel screws
Reinforced Handhole (4” x
6”) w/ cover and stainless
steel hex hd screws
May 2024
6. All electrical splices and fuses to be
within pole handhole (not as pullbox
grade).
7. Verify acceptable clearances from potential
overhead existing electrical with PG&E
Inspection prior to installation. Require
clearances referenced in PG&E Green Book.
8. All electrical splices to be mechanically secured
and sealed to "Waterproof" level per current State
Electrical Code.
9. Streetlight Base Center will be at 24" minimum from
Face of Curb.
10. Pullbox Details:
- Conduits accessing pullbox to have end flair caps and sealed with duct seal. - 6" crushed rock fill within pullbox, top of rock grade below conduit openings. - 1/4" x 1/2" 19 gauge galvanized welded wire mesh to be placed at top of crushed rock fill grade and below accessing conduit openings. - Pullboxes to be placed downstream of adjacent roadway flow of traffic. 6 ft cable loop slack required within pullboxes.
- See Caltrans Standard Details.
121
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
E-02
STREET LIGHT
COBRA HEAD
SINGLE L.E.D.
Notes
1. Pole Specifications:
HAPCO Round Tapered Spun
Aluminum Pole or approved equal.
Model No. RTA316D8C4M1C-01
Arm length shall be 12 feet unless
noted on the plans. Length may vary
based on location and street type.
Fixture Specifications:
LED Fixture by CREE or approved
equal. Model No. XSPSM-DHT-2ME-8L-40K7-UL-SV-N-Q4 56W
for major streets (arterial / collector)
29W for local streets (residential).
2. Foundation Specifications:
Class “A” Concrete Field Cast
4,500 PSI minimum. Rebar
cage per Caltrans ES-7N.
3. Verify anchor bolt design and
bolt circle with manufacturer.
4. Design foundation for 100
mph wind loading.
5. (4) 1”x40”- 8NC Galv. Stl. Anchor Bolts,
AASHTO M314-90 Grade 55, 10” Of
Threaded End Galv. Per ASTM A153.
Minumum anchor bolt embedment depth
shall be 32 inches.`
(4) 1”-8NC Galv. Stl. Hex Nuts
(4) 1” Galv. Stl. Lock Washers
(4) 1” Galv. Stl. Flat Washers
6. A 6” wide minimum concrete pad
around the base of the light pole must
be provided.
ELEVATION
29’6”
6”
CL
See Note 1 See Note 2
Fixture by others
2’6”Rise
2 3/8” O.D.
1’6”
5’0”
30” dia
See Note 3
See Note 6
2” SCH 40 PVC
15’ - #6 Bare CU.
Grd. Wire, secure to
Electrolier Grd. Stud
cover with 2” of soil
prior to pouring base
or 5/8” x 10’ copper
Weld Grd. Rod
HAPCO
Cast Alum. Base
Flange (44207) w/ bolt
covers and stainless
steel hex hd screws
Frame tapped 3/8”-
16NC for grounding
Tapered Alum.
Tube .188” Wall
Alloy 6063-T6
Tapered Alum. Tube
(4” O.D.)
.125” Wall Alloy
(6063-16)
2 1/2” x 5 1/8”
Elliptical Section
Wire hole w/ 1” I.D.
rubber Grommet
Extruded Alum.
Pole Plate Alloy
6063-T6 w/ 1/2”-
13NC Stainless
Steel Hardware
HAPCO Rounded
Tapered Spun
Aluminum Pole or
approved equal
Alum. pole
cap w/
stainless
steel screws
Reinforced Hand hole
(4” x 6”) w/ cover
and stainless steel
hex hd screws
May 2024
7. See Notes on E-01.
122
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
E-03
STREET LIGHT
DECORATIVE
DOUBLE L.E.D.
Notes
1. Pole Specifications:
BEACON Pole Model No. RSA-B-SHO-F14-50-B-TN3-BBT+VINY/5/BBT w/ clam shell base
Pole shall be factory prime coated and
electrostatically powder coated “Black”
with the allocation of a small 3.5-mil
weather resistant powder coat whose
base is polyester and thermocured.
Base painted both inside and out.
2. Fixture Specifications:
BEACON
(2) Model No. T1/AF/H2/24L-55/4K7/DIR3
or DIR4/UNV/SWP/PCR-TL-7P/FINIAL/
BBT
Lens: Acrylic, Frosted
Optics: Type III (residential street)
Type IV (cul de sac)
Light: 24LED Engine and Drivers
Combination
Voltage: 120 through 227 Volts, 60 Hz
Fixture shall be SiteSync ready to include
plug in daughter board or approved equal.
Fixture shall be NRTL Listed for Wet
Location.
Fasteners shall be stainless steel.
3. Foundation Specifications:
Class “A” Concrete Field Cast
2,500 PSI minimum @ 28 days.
4. Verify anchor bolt design and
bolt circle with manufacturer.
5. Design foundation for 100
mph wind loading.
6. Decorative light pole bases shall
be provided at the sole cost of
Developer or Contractor, with
the authorization of the City.
7. Conduit shall be installed
with 30” of cover.
8. Contact Oakley Beacon Manufacturer
Representative (530) 888-8686.
ELEVATION
BASE DETAIL43 1/2”
5”
14’
18’-5 3/4”Ref
Alloy Type
A356 Wall
Thickness
0.188”
GFI Hand hole
42-1/4”
18-1/2”
39-1/2”
8.5” dia bolt
circle per Manf.
Specification
9”
4’
See Note 3
24” to FC
Light Pole
2” PVC to Pull Box
1-1/2 PVC to Pull Box
for Security Camera.
Pull Box to be per
Std. Plan No. E-02
Conc. Sidewalk
2’ Dia
#6 bare solid wire coiled
at bottom of base
4-1” x 36” x 4” Galv.
Anchor Bolts w/
8.5” Bolt Circle
CL
May 2024
9. See Notes on E-01.
123
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
BASE DETAIL
5”
Alloy Type
A356 Wall
Thickness
0.188”
E-04
STREET LIGHT
DECORATIVE
SINGLE L.E.D.
Notes
1. Pole Specifications:
BEACON Pole Model No. RSA-B-SHO-F14-50-B-TN3-BBT+VINY/5/BBT w/ clam shell base
Pole shall be factory prime coated and
electrostatically powder coated “Black”
with the allocation of a small 3.5-mil
weather resistant powder coat whose
base is polyester and thermocured.
Base painted both inside and out.
2. Fixture Specifications:
BEACON
Model No. T1/AF/H2/24L-55/4K7/DIR3 or
DIR4/UNV/SWP/PCR-TL-7P/FINIAL/BBT
Lens: Acrylic, Frosted
Optics: Type III (residential street)
Type IV (cul de sac)
Light: 24LED Engine and Drivers
Combination
Voltage: 120 through 227 Volts, 60 Hz
Fixture shall be NRTL Listed for Wet
Location.
Fasteners shall be stainless
steel and meet AAMA 605.2
performance specification.
3. Foundation Specifications:
Class “A” Concrete Field Cast
2,500 PSI minimum @ 28 days.
4. Verify anchor bolt design and
bolt circle with manufacturer.
5. Design foundation for 100
mph wind loading.
6. Decorative light pole bases shall
be provided at the sole cost of
Developer or Contractor, with
the authorization of the City.
7. Conduit shall be installed
with 30” of cover.
8. Contact Oakley Beacon Manufacturer
Representative
(530) 888-8686.
ELEVATION43 1/2”
14’
17’-6 1/2”
42 1/2”
18 1/2”
8.5” dia bolt
circle per Manf.
Specification
9”
4’
See Note 3
24” to FC
Light Pole
2” PVC to Pull Box
Conc. Sidewalk
2’ Dia
#6 bare solid waire coiled
at bottom of base
4-1” x 36” x 4” Galv.
Anchor Bolts w/
8.5” Bolt Circle
CL
1-1/2 PVC to Pull Box
for Security Camera.
Pull Box to be per
Std. Plan No. E-02
May 2024
9. See Notes on E-01.
124
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
E-05 SIGNAL
SPECIFICATIONS
Notes
1. Within 14 calendar days of receipt of
contractor’s Materials List, the City shall
have the right to request a sample of any
materials used for the construction of the
traffic signal or fiber optic system.
2. The right to request includes, but is not limited
to: controller, controller cabinet, and any
other item deemed necessary to be tested or
inspected for compliance to the materials.
3. Materials not received by the City within
the time specified shall be deemed to
be unsatisfactory, and rejected.
4. All equipment and software installed
shall be compatible with the existing
City traffic control system.
5. The Contractor shall arrange to have a signal
technician (qualified to work on the controller
unit and employed by the controller unit
manufacturer or his representative) present
at the time the equipment is turned on. The
contractor shall deliver a fully operating system.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SPECIFICATIONS
6. The Contractor shall furnish a “Certificate
of Compliance” assuring the City that the
traffic signal controller and cabinet comply
with these Special Provisions and they
will operate as shown on the Plans.
7. The maintenance and repair agreement
period for furnished equipment shall not
commence until the controllers, cabinets,
and auxiliary equipment have been
installed at the project sites, placed in
operation by a factory representative,
and the project accepted as complete.
ITEM MANUFACTURER/MODEL OR TYPE
(OR APPROVED EQUAL)
Signal Controller Type 2070
Signal Controller Software McCain Omni Ex Intersection Control Software for ATC Controllers Version 1.6
Video Detection ITERIS Model Vantage Vector Hybrid Video/ Radar Detection System, The Video/Radar
processors shall be ITERIS Model Vantage
Edge 2 Processors (VEC-EDG201N-PAK)
Traffic Signal Controller Cabinet McCain Type 332
Pedestrian Countdown Clock LEOTEK, Model: TSL-PED-16-CIL Pedestrian Push Button Campbell Company, Model: 4EVR
Lighted Street Name Sign Southern Manufacturing, Mode: Clean Profile L.E.D. Illuminated Sign
May 2024
125
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
SS-01 STREET NAME SIGN
MAJOR STREET
Notes
1. A combination of 6” “Highway Gothic”
Font (UC) with 4.5” “Highway Gothic” Font
(LC) shall be used for street name.
2. Supplementary lettering to indicate the type
of street (such as Street, Avenue, or Road)
shall be in smaller lettering 3” high.
3. The border shall be 0.5” in width. The corners
of the sign should be rounded to fit the border.
4. Street name sign blanks shall be 0.125” thick,
ASTM B209 Alloy 6061-T6, flat aluminum.
5. Reflective sheeting shall be 3M Visual
Impact Performance - Series 3990 (green
and white) and shall be coated with 3M
Premium Protective Overlay Film - Series
1160 (both sides), or approved equivalents.
6. Sign colors shall be a green background
with white letters and white border.
7. Signs shall be double faced (front and
rear) with block arrows pointing in same
direction (i.e. from to right ad rear to left).
8. Sign locations and mounting shall be as
shown on location detail (SS-03) Sheet 3.
Acceptable Sign Abbreviations
AVE Avenue
BLVD Boulevard
CIR Circle
CT Court
DR Drive
LN Lane
PL Place
RD Road
ST Street
TER Terrace
PKWY Parkway
PVT Private
DETAIL
REVERSE SIDE
2.0 2.0
14.0 R=0.5
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
3.0 3.0
3.0 5.0
5.0 10.0
ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES
3.0 2.0
48.0 max
0.25 min
1.5 0.25
0.25 May 2024
126
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
SS-02 STREET NAME SIGN
MINOR STREET
Notes
1. A combination of 6” “Highway Gothic”
Font (UC) with 4.5” “Highway Gothic” Font
(LC) shall be used for street name.
2. Supplementary lettering to indicate the type
of street (such as Street, Avenue, or Road)
shall be in smaller lettering 3” high.
3. The border shall be 0.25” in width. The corners
of the sign should be rounded to fit the border.
4. Street name sign blanks shall be 0.125” thick,
ASTM B209 Alloy 6061-T6, flat aluminum.
5. Reflective sheeting shall be 3M Visual
Impact Performance - Series 3990 (green
and white) and shall be coated with 3M
Premium Protective Overlay Film - Series
1160 (both sides), or approved equivalents.
6. Sign colors shall be a green background
with white letters and white border.
7. Signs shall be double faced (front and rear)
8. Sign locations and mounting shall be as
shown on location detail (SS-03) Sheet 3.
9. At the intersection with public street /
private street name sign shall match
the Standard Drawings but must have
“PVT” where the block would go.
DETAIL
2.25 1.0
2.25 0.75
4.0 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES
0.25 Acceptable Sign Abbreviations
AVE Avenue
BLVD Boulevard
CIR Circle
CT Court
DR Drive
LN Lane
PL Place
RD Road
ST Street
TER Terrace
PKWY Parkway
PVT Private
8.0 24.0 min
5.5 4.0
R=0.5
0.25 0.25
2.25 1.0
May 2024
127
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
SS-03
STREET NAME
SIGN LOCATION
AND MOUNTING
Notes
1. Sign to be located 18” from face of curb
or back of monolithic sidewalk.
2. Bottom of sign shall be mounted 7’
min. above ground or sidewalk per
Detail “A” shown on this sheet.
3. Signs to be City of Oakley
Standard Street Name Sign.
4. Signs shall be mounted with Hawkins’
Heavy Duty Aluminum “Vandal Proof”
(HD) VP Model #V14F-(HD)VP-2c2P
(without finial) or approved equal.
5. Signs mounted on signal standards or
electroliers shall be mounted with Hawkins’
“Vandal Proof” wing bracket Model #V14F-(HD)
VP-AB or approved equal. Brackets shall
be fastened to poles with two (2) 3/4” wide x
0.030” thick Type 201 Stainless Steel bends.
6. Street name sign may be combined
with stop sign (R1), and placed in
a location for maximum visibility as
approved by the City Engineer.
SIGN LOCATIONS
DETAIL “A”
Major Street
Major StreetMajor Street Major Street
Minor Street
Minor Street Minor Street
Minor Street
NOTE:
Stop signs mounted
on same post as street
name signs shall be
below street name
signs. (See Note 6)
Typical
Location at edge
of pavement
(No Sidewalk)
Location in 4’
Monolithic Sidewalk
Location in 10’
Monolithic Sidewalk
Location in
planter strip
8” Dia or Sq
Square Sign
Post Anchor
Base
2” square
Galvanized
Post
7’ Min
Clearance(See Note Below)
4’
18”
18”
3”
18”
May 2024
30”
128
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
L-01A PREFERRED
TREE LIST
STD. PLAN NO.
PREFERRED TREE LIST
List of trees below are suitable for use in the public easement areas in Oakley. Care in selecting the proper tree or the specified need should be foremost in the decision - recommendation process. Small Accent trees can be planted in the easement area but do not meet the criteria of a "Street Tree". Standard trees only. No multi-trunk. The Parks and Landscape Division shall have final decision-making authority on all trees approved in public landscape areas.
ACCENT TREES - Small Sized (Under 25' high)
TREE NAME VARIETY COMMON NAME COMMENTS
Arbutus Marina Hybrid Strawberry Madrone Do not plant adjacent to City Streets or sidewalks. Fruit can be messy
Cercidphyllum japonicum Katura Tree
Parkinsonia hybrid Desert Museum Palo Verde
Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud Male only
Chionanthus retusus Chinese Fringe Tree Do not plant adjacent to City Streets or sidewalks due to wet fruit litter.
Crataegus phaenopyrum Washington Hawthorn Do not plant adjacent to City Streets or sidewalks due to wet fruit litter.
Geijera parviflora Australian Willow
Lagerstroemia indica Hybrid Crape Myrtle Select varietals less susceptible to powdery mildew
Laurus nobilis Saratoga Saratoga Laurel
Magnolia grandiflora Little Gem, Virginiana, Magnolia
or Jim Wilson Moonglow
Prunus cerasifera Krauter vesuvius Purple-Leaf Plum Do not plant adjacent to City Streets or sidewalks. Fruit can be messy
Vitex agnus-castus Chaste
STREET TREES - Medium Sized (25' to 45' high)
TREE NAME VARIETY COMMON NAME COMMENTS
Acer buergerianum Trident Maple
Acer truncatum Pacific Sunset Shantung Maple
Amelanchier laevis Spring Flurry Serviceberry
Carpinus caroliniana American Hornbeam Insects, other issues? Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree
Maackia amurensis Maackia
Magnolia grandiflora St. Mary St. Mary Southern Magnolia Magnolia soulangeana Saucer Magnolia
Metrosideros excelsa New Zealand Christmas Tree Large root area Nyssa sylvatica Sour Gum - Tupelo
Ostrya virginiana American Hop Hornbeam
May 2024
129
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
L-01B PREFERRED
TREE LIST
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
Note: The list above is restricted as the City prohibits the planting of trees in the public easement area with fruit, undesirable seeds, cones, or nuts; Trees with voracious shallow root systems that are known to cause sidewalk or driveway damage; and trees with known pest (disease, insect or invertebrate) problems.
PREFERRED TREE LIST (Cont.)
Tilia cordata Greenspire, Shamrock Little Leaf Linden Susceptible to Aphids or Redmond
Tristaniopsis laurina Elegant Elegant Water Gum Susceptible to Aphids Tristania confertax Lophostemon Brisbane Box Susceptible to Aphids Ulmus parvifolia Emerald Flair Elm Chinese Elm Potential Anthracnose issue Ulmus davidiana Japonica Emerald Sunshine Emerald Sunshine Elm Ulmus wilsoniana Prospector Prospector Elm
NON-RESIDENTAL TREES - Large Sized (Over 45' high)
TREE NAME VARIETY COMMON NAME COMMENTS
Acer rubrum Red Sunset or October Glory Red Maple
Cedrus atlantica Glauca Blue Atlas Cedar
Celtis australis European Hackberry
Magnolia grandiflora Edith Bogue Magnolia
Metasequoia glyptostroboides Dawn Redwood
Pinus eldarica Afghan Pine
Plantinus acerfolia Morton Circle Exclamation Planetree Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak
Quercus ilex Holly Oak
Quercus rubra Red Oak
Quercus virginiana Southern Live Oak
Zelkova serrata Village Green or Sawleaf Zelkova
Musashimo
STREET TREES - Medium Sized (25' to 45' high) (Cont.)
TREE NAME VARIETY COMMON NAME COMMENTS
Pistacia chinensis Pearl Street, Red Push Chinese Pistacia Male Only or Keith Davey
Pyrus calleryana Chanticleer, New Bradford Flowering Pear Do not plant adjacent to City Streets or sidewalks due to wet fruit litter.
May 2024
130
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
L-02 TREE PLANTING
SPECIFICATIONS
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
PLANTING SEQUENCE
TREE SPECIFICATIONS
1. Dig the planting hole as deep as the container and twice as large as its diameter. If over-excavation occurs, foot-tamp bottom of planting hole as necessary to prevent root crown from settling below surrounding grade.
2. Remove the root ball carefully from the container by supporting it from below. Sever any circling roots (3/16 inch or greater) with sharp shears or saw. If the root ball is dense or compacted, carefully loosen the roots at the side and bottom of the root ball. The severing of large roots will encourage new roots initiating at the cuts.
3. Center root ball in hole on undisturbed soil such that root crown is visible at the top of the root crown and 2 inches above grade.
4. Fill planting hole around root ball with backfill mix and foot-tamp in lifts. Be careful not to disturb the root ball.
5. Backfill mix shall be as specified by the soils analysis.
6. Pre-plant and post-plant fertilizers shall be as required by soils analysis.
7. Use the remaining native soil to create a water basin appropriate to the site. Height of water basin shall not exceed height of the root crown.
All trees must meet the following minimum specifications:
1. Height: 7 feet high measured from rootcrown to tip of central leader.
2. Caliper: 1-1/2 inches, measured 6 inches above the root crown (24 inch Box Minimum).
3. Branching: Minimum spread of 2 - 3 feet with good branch distribution.
4. Central Leader: Single, dominant, relatively straight stem.
Any exception to the above must be approved by the City.
All planting stock must have the approval of the City.
City reserves the right to reject trees that do not meet high quality nursery stock of the current edition of the Guideline Specifications for Nursery Tree Quality, published by the Urban Tree Foundation.
May 2024
131
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
TREE PLANTING L-03
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
24" Min.
1' 1'
6' Max.
Planting hole. Center tree in pit. Scarify sides and
bottom of planting hole.
Undisturbed native soil.
Root crown. Placed such that the root crown is
visible and set 2" above surrounding grade.
Root Ball. Completely remove burlap or wire
basket if applicable.
V.I.T Cinch-Tie 32" (See Detail A). Wrap cinch
tie around the tree trunk and the stake twisting to
form a figure "8". Tie with the double back
locking configuration. Secure with Galvanized
nail driven through the cinch tie and into the
stake to prevent slippage.
Tree type shall be determined by Parks Division.
Central leader 2" Gap Typ
2x Root Ball Dia.
6" Max.
below
main fork
or branch
Varies
3" Min. depth mulch as specified. Do not place
mulch within 3"-4" of tree trunk.
(2) 3" Dia. mpu
in. Pressure Treated Poles (Typ).
DETAIL A
Backfill mix as specified.
Bubbler (Typ)
1. Avoid damage to roots.
2. Avoid root ball when placing stakes.
3. Root barrier required for trees 6' or less from paving, wall or building. See Standard Plan L-04 for Root
Barrier installation.
4. Backfill mix and post-plant fertilizer as required by soils analysis.
NOTES:
Water basin. Height not to exceed root crown.
6"
Finish grade.
May 2024
132
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
ROOT BARRIER L-04
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
1. Install per manufacturers specifications directly against edge without voids.
2. Panel length per manufacturers specifications and extend a min. length of 10' from trunk.
3. Linear installation shall extend a min. of 10' from centerline of tree for a min. 20' overall length.
4. Surround installation at perimeter of concrete tree wells only.
Tree 6' or less from paving,
wall or building
1-1/2" Min. above finish grade (Typ)
Finish grade.
Root ball.
Curb and gutter or
other paving.
Edge of paving, wall or
building
Mulch as applicable.
Root barrier control panel
UB24 by Deep Root Corp.
Planting hole see Standard
Plan L-03.
May 2024
133
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
SHRUB PLANTING L-05
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
Planting hole. Center plant in pit. Scarify sides
and bottom of planting hole.
Plant as specified.
Undisturbed native soil.
3" Min. depth mulch as specified. Do not place
mulch within 3"-4" of tree trunk.
Backfill mix as specified.
Finish grade.
Water basin. Height not to exceed root crown.
Root ball.
Root crown. Plant root crown 2" above
surrounding grade.
NOTES:
1. Backfill mix and post-plant fertilizer as required by soils analysis. 2x Root Ball Dia.
May 2024
134
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
PLANT SPACING L-06
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
S S
S
S
Plant as specified (Typ)
Edge of paving, wall, building, or utility box.
PLANT QUANTITY CHART
Spacing Plants per Square Foot
6" O.C. 4.60
8" O.C. 2.60
10" O.C. 1.66
12" O.C. 1.15
15" O.C. 0.738
18" O.C. 0.512
24" O.C. 0.290
30" O.C. 0.185
36" O.C. 0.116
NOTES:
1. S = On-center plant spacing.
2. Use the larger on center spacing for spacing at interface of different plant species.
3. This detail is intended as a guide for shrubs and groundcover spaced at equal distance from each other.
May 2024
135
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
IR-01 IRRIGATION
EQUIPMENT LIST
Valve Boxes with Stainless Steel Lock-Down Bolts
Remote Control Valve
Quick Coupling Valve
Ball Valve
Pop-Up Stream Rotor
Gear Driven Rotor
Pop-Up Spray
Bubbler
Per Diablo Water District Specifications and Details
Nibco F-619-RWS-SON (Flanged end w/ square operating nut) Backflow Preventer, Freeze Protections and Enclosure
NOTES:
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT LIST
MANUFACTURER/MODEL
(OR APPROVED EQUAL) ITEM
KBI SCH 80 PVC True Union Type (at Remote Control Valves and Quick Coupling Valves)
Master Valve Included with Controller Assembly (See Note 1 below) Flow Sensor
Hunter ICV Series with Filter Sentry
Carson black colored box and t-cover lid in shrub areas and green colored box and t-cover lid for turf areas. Use Carson Specification Gate & Quick Coupling Valve Box with Stainless Steel Grade.
Lock-Down Bolts
Controller Assembly
Hunter PROS-PRS40-CV-F Series with MP Rotator Nozzles (6" Pop-ups in Turf and 12" Pop-ups in Shrubs)
Hunter I-20-SS and I-25-SS Series (6" Pop-ups in Turf and 12" Pop-ups in Shrubs), and I-40 Series (Sports Turf)
Hunter PROS-PRS30-CV-F Series with PRO Series Nozzles (6" Pop-ups in Turf and 12" Pop-ups in Shrubs)
Hunter PCB Series (0.25 GPM, 1 per Shrub and 2 per Tree) or HEB Series w/ Diffuser Cap (Shrubs only-Size for application)
1. 2.
3. SiteOne Satellite Controller Assembly: SA6-WT5-H2OXX-AX/RSE/FAN-16/GRP-K/UFMVC-150P+200/CAB14-B/FS-CAB with WT2W-H2O-1VD/WT2W-H2O-SA/GR-K for 2-wire path.
HydroPoint WeatherTRAK Optiflow XR 2-wire controller housed in a 16” top entry Strong Box stainless steel enclosure with master valve, flow sensor, enclosure fan, and rain sensor.
All inclusive includes ten years service and warranty. Provide one (1) Apple iPad Pro (12.9 inch size and most current generation 1TB with wi-fi), Smart Keyboard Folio for iPad Pro, Apple Pencil (most current generation), AppleCare with 2 year service coverage.
Contact SiteOne Representative at (800) SITE-ONE for purchase order, preconstruction meeting, test for communication with central computer, warranty, and certifications. Contractor shall verify power availability and install unit per manufacturer's specifications on specified on concrete pad. Controller commissioning, flow sensor commissioning and Optiflow site optimization shall be conducted by Hydropoint Data Systems or SiteOne prior to turnover to the City.
All shrub areas shall be designed with a 100% bubbler based system (no drip, dripline or micro irrigation). Overhead irrigation may be allowed in some instances for ground cover where area 10' or wider.
Rotors are preferred for all turf areas. Where rotors are not feasible, pop-up rotators will be acceptable substitute. 44 LRC or 44 NP (for Non-Potable)
Gate Valve (4 inch and larger)
Leemco LGT-XXSS (Stainless steel gate valve w/ cross handle) HydroPoint WeatherTRAK ET Pro 3 or Optiflow XR (Based on application) SiteOne Satellite Assembly (See Note 1 Below) Gate Valve (3 inch and smaller)
Included with Controller Assembly (See Note 1 below)
Pressure Reducing Valve Wilkins 500HLR Series
Remote Control Valve w/ Filter and Pressure Regulator Hunter PCZ Series (set at 25 PSI) Tree Bubbler (in paved areas or tree well)
Sub-Surface Irrigation (Limited use upon approval by Parks and Landscape Maintenance Manager)
Hunter RZWS-18-25-CV-SLEEVE
Hunter HDL-CV Series (Size for application)
with ECO-Indicator, PLD-AVR, and PLD-BV
STD. PLAN NO.
May 2024
136
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
IR-02
IRRIGATION
ELECTRICAL
METER PEDESTAL
16"
13"
16"
MOUNTING BASE
16"
8"
48"
44"
17"
CABINET SECTION
Means provided to hold door in open position
Demand meter reset cover with window
Padlock Bracket extending thru door for
security
Lift off Service Cover
Hinged Deadfront
Fully hinged meter/test section cover
Ground Rod
LEGEND:
1. Landscape screening shall be required with 36" min. clearance on the front and back of the enclosure.
2. Service Cabinet shall be type Milbank West CP3B11115A Stainless Steel for 100-Ampere and less or approved equal.
NOTES:
17" Encl
Depth
3" Min Foundation Extension on all sides; 6" Min depth
22-1/2" Utility
Termination
Landing
Service
Terminal
Section
Customer
Section
Stainless
Steel
Hinged
Exterior
Door
14-1/2"
1-7/8" 14-1/2"
12-1/4"
1-1/2"
(4) 5/8" -11 x 18" Anchor Bolts
6-1/2"
12-1/4"
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
May 2024
137
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
CONTROLLER
ASSEMBLY IR-03
SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW
8'-12'
lid
open
Ϊ
Ǧ
1 2
3 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 7 14
5 15
13 12
11 9
10 1
2 3
8 9
6 7
9-1/2"
to ground plate
6" min
1 2
3 4
5 4
1. Installation shall comply with the current edition of the National Electric Code and the manufacturer's specifications.
2. Electrical service from source to controller location shall be provided by the Electrical Contractor.
3. Irrigation Contractor shall provide rigid steel conduit from service stub-out to controller GFCI switch and shall complete electrical service to controller.
4. Enclosure's field location and orientation shall be approved by the City. Provide 12" min. horizontal clearance from edges.
5. Seal all open ends of conduit with non-hardening duct seal.
6. Provide continuous bead of clear, outdoor caulk on exterior base of controller pedestal.
NOTES:
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
6" min
24" Min.
Cover
6 Strongbox Stainless Steel NEMA 3R Rainproof
Enclosure (UL listed).
Satellite Assembly by SiteOne GreenTech.
Terminal strip for control wires.
Service Disconnect Switch w/ GFCI Receptacle.
Electrical Flex Conduit for power.
Concrete pad with anchor bolts per manufacturer
recommendations. 6" min. thick and sloped to drain.
Finished grade.
Flow Sensor Terminal Board.
4 5
6 1-1/2" SCH 40 PVC electrical conduit w/ sweep ell for Flow Sensor Cable.
Electrical conduit w/ sweep ell for Control Wires. Use
3" SCH 40 PVC for Conventional wire systems or
1-1/2" SCH 40 PVC for 2-Wire systems.
1-1/2" SCH 40 PVC electrical conduit w/ sweep ell for
Master Valve Wires.
1-1/2" rigid steel electrical conduit w/ sweep ell for 110 VAC Power Line.
1-1/2" SCH 40 PVC electrical conduit w/ sweep ell for
Ground Wire.
Copper grounding plate required, See Detail IR-04.
#6 Ground Wire secured to Backboard Grounding
Terminal.
May 2024
138
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
IR-04 CONTROLLER
GROUNDING
Concrete pad
30"
8' - 12'
Copper Ground Plate
6 AWG solid bare
Copper wire
Copper Ground Plate Earth Contact Material
Irrigation Controller
TOP VIEW
1-1/2" min. SCH 40 PVC electrical conduit w/ sweep ell
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
Irrigation Controller
6 AWG solid bare
Copper wire
SIDE VIEW
NOTES:
1. Grounding shall meet the minimum requirements of the current edition of the National Electric Code, the American Society of Irrigation Consultants Guideline 100-2002 for Earth Grounding Electronic Equipment in Irrigation Systems, and the manufacturer's requirements.
2. Seal all open ends of conduit with non-hardening duct seal and slope to drain away.
May 2024
139
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
GROUNDING ROD IR-05
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
Round plastic valve box w/ bolt-down lid.
Heat stamp "GR" on lid
Finish Grade
NOTES:
1. Grounding shall meet the minimum requirements of the current edition of the National Electric Code and the American Society of Irrigation Consultants Guideline 100-2002 for Earth Grounding Electronic Equipment in Irrigation Systems.
2. See Standard Plan IR-13 for Irrigation Valve Box Installation.
3. Cover box cut-outs with 10 MIL pipe tape to prevent soil in box.
Ground Rod, 8' long by 5/8" diameter
Copper Clad Rod, locate 8' from
equipment and control wire path
6 AWG solid bare Copper wire, 12" min.
cover and avoid kinks or bending
Cadweld Connection
3/4" Drain Rock at 12" min. depth.
Extend 2" beyond perimeter of box
3 Common Bricks for leveling (Typ)
1/4"-1/2" - 19 Gauge Galvanized
Welded Wire Mesh
May 2024
140
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
MASTER VALVE IR-06
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
to Flow Sensor
NOTES:
Rectangular plastic valve box w/ bolt-down lid.
Heat brand "MV" on lid
4 Common Bricks
for leveling (Typ)
Finish Grade
Varies
24" Min.
Cover
SCH 80 PVC Union (Typ)
SCH 80 PVC Reducer Bushing
from Master Valve size to Flow
Sensor size
SCH 40 PVC Mainline
SCH 80 PVC Nipple (Typ)
Valve ID Tag
Waterproof Connector (Typ)
SCH 80 PVC Adapter from Mainline
size to Master Valve size
SCH 80 PVC 45 degree Elbow (Typ)
SCH 40 PVC Mainline size per plan
1. Provide a 36" expansion coil at wire connections.
2. See Standard Plan IR-13 for Irrigation Valve Box Installation.
3. Designate purple color-coding on appropriate appurtenance and reclaimed water warning tags when used with reclaimed water.
4. Cover box cut-outs with 10 MIL pipe tape to prevent soil in box.
5. Terminate conduit inside valve box in location to prevent obstruction of servicing equipment.
6. Seal all open ends of conduit with non-hardening duct seal and slope to drain away.
Master Valve
4" Min.
3/4" Drain Rock at 12" min.
depth. Extend 2" beyond
perimeter of box
3"±
1/4"-1/2" - 19 Gauge
Galvanized Welded Wire
Mesh
Extend top of conduit to
3' +/- below bottom of lid
1-1/2" SCH 40 PVC electrical
conduit w/ sweep ell with
Master Valve Cable. Locate
to prevent obstruction of
servicing valves.
May 2024
141
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
FLOW SENSOR IR-07
Direction of Flow
10x Pipe Dia.
Dimension 'A'
Flow
Sensor
5x Pipe Dia.
Dimension 'B'
No Valves, Reducers or Elbows in this area
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
Rectangular plastic valve box w/ bolt-down lid.
Heat brand "FS" on lid
4 Common Bricks
for leveling (Typ)
SCH 40 PVC Mainline
size per plan
SCH 40 PVC Mainline size of Flow Sensor
SCH 80 PVC Reducer Bushing
from Flow Sensor size to Mainline
size
SCH 80 PVC Reducer Bushing
from Master Valve size to Flow
Sensor size
1-1/2" SCH 40 PVC electrical conduit
w/ sweep ell with Flow Sensor Cable.
Valve ID Tag
Varies
24" Min.
Cover
SCH 80 PVC 45 degree
Elbow (Typ)
1/4"-1/2" - 19 Gauge
Galvanized Welded Wire
Mesh
4" Min.
3/4" Drain Rock at 12" min.
depth. Extend 2" beyond
perimeter of box
NOTES:
3"±
1. Provide a 36" expansion coil at wire connections.
2. See Standard Plan IR-13 for Irrigation Valve Box Installation.
3. Designate purple color-coding on appropriate appurtenance and reclaimed water warning tags when used with reclaimed water.
4. Cover box cut-outs with 10 MIL pipe tape to prevent soil in box.
5. Terminate conduit inside valve box in location to prevent obstruction of servicing equipment.
6. Seal all open ends of conduit with non-hardening duct seal and slope to drain away.
Flow Sensor
Install at 45 degree angle
Waterproof
May 2024
Finish Grade
Finish Grade
Extend top of conduit to 3' +/- below bottom of lid
142
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
TRENCHING IR-08
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
MAINLINE JOINT TRENCH
24"
12" 12"
WIRE
IN CONDUIT
120 VOLT
CONDUIT
DOMESTIC
WATER
LATERAL
LINE
1. All mainline shall be installed per manufacturer's specifications.
2. All PVC pipe shall be installed in the trench in a serpentine manner per manufacturer's specifications.
3. All pipe in joint trenches shall be place with 2" min. between pipes. Pipe of other trades shall be placed with a 6" min. between pipes unless specified otherwise.
4. All 120 volt wiring in conduit shall be installed per local ordinances and codes.
5. Tape and bundle wire at 10' intervals. All wire not in joint trench with mainline shall be installed in conduit. 10"
6" min. (Typ)
10" 10" 14"
NOTES:
24" 24"
12"
12" 12"
24"
Domestic
Water
Wire
Mainline
Clean Fill (Typ)
120 Volt
Finish Grade (Typ)
Marking Tape
See
Legend
Finish Grade (Typ)
See
Legend
Clean Fill (Typ)
Marking Tape
Marking Tape
24"
May 2024
143
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
TBBA
(2) #4 Bars
12" Min
TBBA
12" Min
(2) #4 Bars (2) #4 Bars
TBBA
12" Min
1. Thrust Blocks shall only be used if Joint Restraints are not specified. Install joint restraints per the manufacturer's specifications and provide polyethylene encasement of all cast iron and ductile iron pipe and fittings per the City General Notes for Park and Landscape Improvement Plans.
2. Thrust blocks shall not project higher than 1/2 the distance from the bottom of the trench to finish grade. Place concrete against undisturbed soil.
3. Do not cover ends of fittings or bolts with concrete or allow concrete to come in contact with PVC.
4. Concrete shall have compression strength of 2000 PSI.
5. Consult Manufacturer's literature for recommended Thrust Block Bearing Area (TBBA) based on actual field conditions.
At Minimum TBBA shall be sized as follows:
4"
6"
8"
1.5 SQ FT
3.5 SQ FT
6.3 SQ FT
1.0 SQ FT
2.5 SQ FT
4.5 SQ FT
1.0 SQ FT*
2.5 SQ FT*
4.5 SQ FT*
* OR AS DESIGNED BY THE ENGINEER.
REDUCERS TEES & DEAD ENDS
ELBOWS VALVES
PIPE SIZE 90-DEGREE ELLS 45-DEGREE ELLS
VALVES, TEES,
REDUCERS, DEAD ENDS
NOTES:
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
12" Min
TBBA
(2) #4 Bars
THRUST BLOCKS IR-09
NOT TO SCALE
May 2024
144
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
IR-10 GATE VALVE
(4 INCH & LARGER)
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
Ductile Iron Self-Restrained
Fitting (Typ)
4" Min.
Round plastic valve box w/ bolt-down lid.
Heat stamp "GV" on lid
3 Common Bricks for leveling (Typ)
10" Class 160 PVC Sleeve. Notch
over Mainline as necessary.
Class 200 PVC
Mainline (Typ)
Finish Grade
36" Min.
Cover
Gate Valve
1. See Standard Plan IR-13 for Irrigation Valve Box Installation.
2. Install joint restraints per the manufacturer's specifications and provide polyethylene encasement of all cast iron and ductile iron pipe and fittings per the City General Notes for Park and Landscape Improvement Plans.
3. Designate purple color-coding on appropriate appurtenance and reclaimed water warning tags when used with reclaimed water.
4. Cover box cut-outs with 10 MIL pipe tape to prevent soil in box.
NOTES:
3/4" Drain Rock at 12" min. depth.
Extend 2" beyond perimeter of box
1/4"-1/2" - 19 Gauge Galvanized
Welded Wire Mesh
May 2024
145
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
IR-11 GATE VALVE
(3 INCH & SMALLER)
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
4" Min.
Round plastic valve box w/ bolt-down lid.
Heat stamp "GV" on lid
10" Class 160 PVC Sleeve. Notch
over Mainline as necessary.
SCH 80 PVC Union
SCH 40 PVC Mainline
SCH 80 PVC Adapter
Finish Grade
24" Min.
Cover
Gate Valve
1. See Standard Plan IR-13 for Irrigation Valve Box Installation.
2. Designate purple color-coding on appropriate appurtenance and reclaimed water warning tags when used with reclaimed water.
3. Cover box cut-outs with 10 MIL pipe tape to prevent soil in box.
NOTES:
SCH 80 PVC threaded nipple
3 Common Bricks for leveling (Typ)
3/4" Drain Rock at 12" min. depth.
Extend 2" beyond perimeter of box
1/4"-1/2" - 19 Gauge Galvanized
Welded Wire Mesh
May 2024
146
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
1. See Standard Plan IR-13 for Irrigation Valve Box Installation.
2. Adjust valve box to permit full operation and maintenance of equipment.
3. Designate purple color-coding on appropriate appurtenance and reclaimed water warning tags when used with reclaimed water.
4. Cover box cut-outs with 10 MIL pipe tape to prevent soil in box.
NOTES:
Rectangular plastic valve box w/ bolt-down lid.
Heat brand "QC" on lid
4 Common Bricks for leveling (Typ)
Valve box extension
Stainless Steel Clamp (Typ)
1" x 3/16" x 30" Angle Iron
1/4"-1/2" - 19 Gauge Galvanized
Welded Wire Mesh
SCH 80 PVC, 4" Nipple
SCH 80 PVC Tee or 90 Elbow
connected to Irrigation Mainline
SCH 80 PVC,
90 Elbow (Typ)
SCH 40 PVC Mainline
Quick Coupling Valve
Varies
24" Min.
Cover
SCH 80 PVC True Union Ball Valve
3/4" Drain Rock at 12" min. depth.
Extend 2" beyond perimeter of box
SCH 80 PVC Nipple (Typ)
Finish Grade
2"±
1/2"
4" Min.
IR-12 QUICK COUPLING
VALVE
NOT TO SCALE
May 2024
SCH 80 PVC,
length as necessary
147
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
VALVE BOX
INSTALLATION IR-13
12" 12"
Planting Area 12" 12"
Edge of lawn, walk,
fence, curb, etc.
10" round Valve Box
Rectangular Valve Box (Typ)
1. Retangular valve boxes shall be 11-3/4" X 17" X 12" deep valve box. Use 16" X 25-1/2" X 15" deep rectangular valve box for 1-1/4" and larger valve assemblies.
2. Center boxes over valves to permit service of valves and unions.
3. Set boxes in ground cover/shrub area where possible and maintain a minimum of 5' for trees.
4. Set boxes parallel to each other and perpendicular to edge.
5. Set boxes 1" above grade in turf areas and 3" above grade in shrub areas.
6. Avoid heavily compacting soil around boxes to prevent damaging valve boxes.
7. Heat Brand ID on valve box lid with 2" height letters:
'X1' for Remote Control Valves ('X' = Controller '1' = station number) 'FS' for Flow Sensor
'MV' for Master Control Valve
'GV' for Gate Valve
'QC' for Quick Coupling Valve
'SP' for Splice Box
'PB' for Pull Box
8. Install stainless steel bolts in locking cover.
9. Designate purple colored boxes and lids with reclaimed water warning tags when used with reclaimed water.
10.Install valve box extensions as required to completely enclose valve assemblies.
11.Cover box cut-outs with 10 MIL pipe tape to prevent soil in box.
QC
A1 Heat Brand ID (Typ)
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
PLAN
GV
May 2024
148
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
IR-14 SPLICE BOX/
PULL BOX
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
Finish Grade
Round plastic valve box w/ bolt-down lid.
Heat stamp "PB" on lid Finish Grade
3 Common Bricks for leveling (Typ)
1. See Standard Plan IR-13 for Irrigation Valve Box Installation.
2. Cover box cut-outs with 10 MIL pipe tape to prevent soil in box.
3. Seal all open ends of conduit with non-hardening duct seal and slope to drain away.
4. Include pull rope for spare or empty conduits to pull boxes intended for future wire installation.
5. See City General Notes for Park and Landscape Improvement Plans for additional requirements.
NOTES:
SPLICE BOX
PULL BOX
Cable or Pull Rope, 36" expansion loop
3/4" Drain Rock at 12" min. depth.
Extend 2" beyond perimeter of box
Use 3" SCH 40 PVC electrical conduit
w/ sweep ell for Conventional wire
systems or 1-1/2" SCH 40 PVC for
2-Wire systems (Typ)
Control Wire or Cable, 36" expansion coil
Waterproof Connector (Typ)
1/4"-1/2" - 19 Gauge Galvanized
Welded Wire Mesh
3 Common Bricks for leveling (Typ)
3/4" Drain Rock at 12" min. depth.
Extend 2" beyond perimeter of box
1/4"-1/2" - 19 Gauge Galvanized
Welded Wire Mesh
Use 3" SCH 40 PVC electrical conduit
w/ sweep ell for Conventional wire
systems or 1-1/2" SCH 40 PVC for
2-Wire systems (Typ)
Round plastic valve box w/ bolt-down lid.
Heat stamp "SP" on lid
Extend top of conduit to 3' +/- below bottom of lid
Extend top of conduit to 3' +/- below bottom of lid
May 2024
149
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
IR-15 IRRIGATION WIRE
CONNECTION
Eq Eq
STEP 1: Strip both wires. Twist strand around rigid
strand over half the length of stripped wires.
Tube Cover
Locking Fingers
STEP 5: Position all the wires through the
dedicated insulator channels and snap insulator
tube cover closed.
STEP 3: Insert the twisted splice into the "Y"
electrical spring connection and twist over wire
strands in a clockwise direction.
STEP 4: Insert the connector into the gel-filled
direct bury splice kit. Push past the locking fingers
to secure connector inside tube.
STEP 2: Fold the other half of the rigid strand over
twisted strand as shown.
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
1. Use 3M DBR/Y-6 Direct Bury Splice Kit or approved equal
2. Maximum wire sizes per connector are 3-#4's or 2-#12's May 2024
150
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
IR-16 REMOTE CONTROL
VALVE
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
1. Provide a 36" expansion coil at wire connections.
2. See Standard Plan IR-13 for Irrigation Valve Box Installation.
3. Designate purple color-coding on appropriate appurtenance and reclaimed water warning tags when used with reclaimed water.
4. Cover box cut-outs with 10 MIL pipe tape to prevent soil in box.
5. Terminate conduit inside valve box in location to prevent obstruction of servicing equipment.
6. Seal all open ends of conduit with non-hardening duct seal and slope to drain away.
Rectangular plastic valve box w/ bolt-down lid.
Heat brand valve number on lid.
4 Common Bricks for leveling (Typ)
SCH 80 PVC Union (Typ)
SCH 40 PVC Adapter from
Valve size to Lateral Line size
SCH 80 PVC Nipple (Typ)
1-1/2" SCH 40 PVC electrical conduit
w/ sweep ell with Control Wires for
2-Wire systems.
1/4"-1/2" - 19 Gauge Galvanized
Welded Wire Mesh
3/4" Drain Rock at 12" min. depth.
Extend 2" beyond perimeter of box
2-Wire Decoder as required for 2-Wire systems.
Zip tie to inside lip of valve box.
SCH 40 PVC Mainline size per plan
SCH 80 PVC Tee or 90 Elbow
connected to Irrigation Mainline
SCH 80 PVC Nipple (Typ)
SCH 80 PVC Elbow (Typ)
SCH 40 PVC Lateral Line
SCH 40 PVC 45 degree
Elbow (Typ)
4" Min.
Varies
24" Min.
Cover
3"±
12" Min.
Cover
Remote Control Valve
Valve ID Tag
SCH 80 PVC True Union Ball Valve
Waterproof Connector (Typ)
Extend top of conduit to 3'
+/- below bottom of lid
Finish Grade
May 2024
151
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
IR-17
REMOTE CONTROL
VALVE WITH
FILTER KIT
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
1. Provide a 36" expansion coil at wire connections.
2. See Standard Plan IR-13 for Irrigation Valve Box Installation.
3. Designate purple color-coding on appropriate appurtenance and reclaimed water warning tags when used with reclaimed water.
4. Cover box cut-outs with 10 MIL pipe tape to prevent soil in box.
5. Terminate conduit inside valve box in location to prevent obstruction of servicing equipment.
6. Seal all open ends of conduit with non-hardening duct seal and slope to drain away.
Rectangular plastic valve box w/ bolt-down lid.
Heat brand valve number on lid.
4 Common Bricks for leveling (Typ)
Varies
24" Min.
Cover
SCH 80 PVC Union (Typ)
SCH 40 PVC Adapter from
Valve size to Lateral Line size
SCH 40 PVC Lateral Line
SCH 80 PVC Nipple (Typ)
1-1/2" SCH 40 PVC electrical conduit
w/ sweep ell with Control Wires for
2-Wire systems.
1/4"-1/2" - 19 Gauge Galvanized
Welded Wire Mesh
4" Min.
3/4" Drain Rock at 12" min. depth.
Extend 2" beyond perimeter of box
1"±
Remote Control Valve
Valve ID Tag
SCH 80 PVC True Union Ball Valve
SCH 40 PVC 45 degree
Elbow (Typ)
SCH 40 PVC Mainline size per plan
SCH 80 PVC Tee or 90 Elbow
connected to Irrigation Mainline
SCH 80 PVC Nipple (Typ)
SCH 80 PVC Elbow (Typ)
2-Wire Decoder as required for 2-Wire systems.
Zip tie to inside lip of valve box.
12" Min.
Cover
Waterproof Connector (Typ)
Extend top of conduit to 3'
+/- below bottom of lid
May 2024
Finish Grade
152
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
IR-18 POP-UP ROTOR
HEAD
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
12" Min.
Cover
See Note
Pop-up Rotor below
Finish Grade
Edge
SCH 80 PVC Nipple (Length as required)
PVC Irrigation Lateral
SCH 80 PVC 2-1/2" Nipple between elbows
SCH 80 PVC Nipple (10" min.)
30 - 60 angle on swing joint
SCH 80 PVC 90 Elbow (TxT)
SCH 80 PVC Nipple out of Tee
SCH 40 PVC 90 Elbow (SxT) or Tee (SxSxT)
SCH 80 PVC Elbow (TxT)
1. Set head 1" above grade in turf areas and 3" above grade in shrub areas.
2. 2" clear in turf and 6" clear in shrub areas from edges i.e. header, mowband, wall, fence, or pavement.
3. Set all heads minimum of 24" clear from edge of impervious pavement that does not drain into landscape.
May 2024
153
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
POP-UP SPRAY HEAD IR-19
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
12" Min.
Cover
NOTES:
1. Set head 1" above grade in turf areas and 3" above grade in shrub areas.
2. 2" clear in turf and 6" clear in shrub areas from edges i.e. header, mowband, wall, fence, or pavement.
3. Set all heads minimum of 24" clear from edge of impervious pavement that does not drain into landscape.
See Note
Pop-Up Spray Head below
Finish Grade
Edge
PVC Irrigation Lateral
SCH 80 PVC Nipple (10" min.)
30 - 60 angle on swing joint
SCH 40 PVC Street Ell
Marlex Street Ell
SCH 40 PVC 90 Elbow (SxT) or Tee (SxSxT)
Marlex Street Ell
May 2024
154
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
BUBBLER IR-20
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
1. Flexible hose shall be algae and UV resistant.
2. Primer ALL solvent weld connections between PVC and flexible hose.
3. Use only IPS Weld-On #795 cement at flexible hose connections.
4. Secure bubbler at edge of plant root ball.
5. Locate bubblers on uphill side of plants on slopes.
6. Locate bubblers on opposite sides of tree and prevent conflicts with tree staking. 12" Min.
Cover
Finish Grade
1/2" gray SCH 40 or SCH
80 PVC Male Adapter
Valcon 5000 Series spring-loaded check
valve. Install where low head drainage
will cause erosion and/or excess water.
Slope
Root ball
Plant
1/2" SCH 40 PVC Male Adapter
1/2" IPS Flexible PVC hose (0.840 O.D.)
SCH 40 PVC, 90 Elbow (SxT) or Tee (SxSxT) at PVC Irrigation Lateral SCH 80 PVC Nipple
Mulch
Bubbler. Set at edge of plant root ball
May 2024
155
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
SITE AMENITIES M-01
STD. PLAN NO.
SITE AMENITIES
1. All Outdoor Creation Inc. products to include City logo and anti-graffiti Nano Tech Barrier sealer coat.
2. All steel near overhead irrigation shall be galvanized and powder coated or stainless steel.
ITEM MANUFACTURER/MODEL NOTES
(OR APPROVED EQUAL)
Park Bench Dumor Vertical Slat w/back, Non-skateboard, Black, Middle Bench Model: 119-60 arm rest
Park Bench - Concrete Outdoor Creations Inc. Concrete color: Davis Sequoia Sand or approved alternate Bench Model: 408SKB City of Oakley Logo: 11” x 5.2" in full relief on backrest, no color
Picnic Table Outdoor Creations Inc. Concrete color: Davis Sequoia Sand or approved alternate Side Entrance Table City of Oakley Logo: 11” x 5.2” in full relief on table legs (2) Model: 100S and 107S or 108S no color, use skate blocks and ADA accommodations Group Barbeque - Concrete Outdoor Creations Inc. Concrete color: Davis Sequoia Sand or approved alternate Group BBQ City of Oakley Logo: 11” x 5.2” in full relief onopposing Model:3001AG sides (2) of receptacle, no color
Barbeque - Concrete Outdoor Creations Inc. Concrete color: Davis Sequoia Sand or approved alternate Family BBQ City of Oakley Logo: 11” x 5.2” in full relief on opposing Model: 3001A sides (2) of receptacle, no color
Drinking Fountain Haws Vandal resistant, green powder coated finish with pet Barrier Free Stainless Steel fountain, use Freeze Resistant Bury Valve as specified by Pedestal Fountain the City
Model: 3500D-FR
Trash Receptacle Outdoor Creations Inc.
Concrete Trash Receptacle-Round
Model: 500
Concrete color: Davis Sequoia Sand or approved alternate City of Oakley Logo: 16” x 6” engraved and painted as
specified on 1 side of trash can. Stainless steel powder coated lid & galvanized cable, bolts, nuts and washer.
Recycle Receptacle Outdoor Creations Inc.
Concrete Trash Receptacle-Round
Model: 500
Concrete color: Davis Sequoia Sand or approved alternate City of Oakley Logo: 16” x 6” engraved and painted as
specified on 1 side of trash can. Stainless steel powder coated lid & galvanized cable, bots, nuts and washer.
Trash & Recycle Receptacle Outdoor Creations Inc. Concrete color: Davis Sequoia Sand or approved alternate (Option) Concrete Dual Trash & Receptacle City of Oakley Logo: 11” x 5.2” in full relief on 1 side of trash Rectangular Model: 511 can. Blue door for recycle receptacle door Dog Waste Dispenser Zero Waste Install on 6x6 PTDF Post Model: JJ1B008 City standard sign available for purchase from City Bleachers Patterson Williams 3-Row, 15' aluminum frame bleacher without guardrail Model: 1171-315A
Park Sign Outdoor Creation Inc. Concrete color: Davis Sequoia Sand Model: 7070S with 703C Base Park name & address: as approved by City Bollards - Removable 1-800-Bollards Color: as approved by City Model: RPSS4000-1
Perimeter Fence American Precast Concrete Inc. 3'3” tall, 2 rails Model: Woodcrete Rails Color: Buff
Perimeter Fence (Option) None 3' tall, 2 rails, see detail M-04 Playground Fence As required by ASTM F2049-11
Playground Surfacing sofSURFACES Color: as approved by City Model: duraSAFE 5.25 Premium 95 Series
Restroom Facility CXT Precast Product Color and fixtures: as approved by City Model: Cortez-19
May 2024
156
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
M-02
REMOVABLE
BOLLARD
PARK OR TRAIL
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
1. Add reflective tape, two 1" bands at top.
2. Installation to be completed in accordance with manufacturer's specifications.
3. Bollard shall be as manufactured by 1800Bollards, (800) 265-5273 or www.1800Bollards.com.
Hinging lid
City provided lock
2'-0"
1'-0"
3'-0"
SECTION
1'-6"
Dia.
Finish Grade
4" dia. Type 316 stainless steel Bollard
1/2" Hole with #3 Rebar
1" Reflective tape (Typ)
Undisturbed native soil or
engineered fill per soils report
Concrete Footing
2" Gravel Base
Dome cap
Stainless steel receiver sleeve
Embed Sleeve and hinging lid flush
NOTES:
May 2024
157
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
APPROVED BY
CITY ENGINEER
DATE STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
JUNE 2016 M-03
CL CL
NOT TO SCALE
FENCE CHAIN LINK
FENCE CHAIN LINK M-03
See Note D
3”
3” 3”
Post Post
Height per plan
Height per plan
Width per plan
See Note C
12”
30”
3” Clr
3” Clr
9” diameter, typ
8”dia
Notes:
A. Concrete for footings
shall be Class “B” (2500
PSI) for more information,
see specifications.
B. Provide submittal
for all materials
C. 36” depth for 4’ high
fence, 48” depth for 6’
high fence and above.
D. 12” diameter for 4’ high
fence, 18”diameter for 6’
high fence and above.
Legend
Midrail 1-5/8” diameter for gates 6’ high minimum
Locking mechanism
Chain link wire mesh, posts and hardwaregalvanized and powder coated: black Finish grade, or finish surface
Terminal or corner post at gate, 3” diameter
Truss rod, at corners and ends
Post concrete footing, typical
Compacted subgrade to 95% relative compaction
Gate Rail, 1-7/8” outside diameter
Gate lock NIC to be determined by City
Gate frame vertical, 2-1/2” OD for 4’ high
fence, 3” OD for greater than 4’ high fence
Gate bottom, per specifications
Concrete footing with sleeve to accept
locking mechanism in closed position,
typical of 2 (other location to be where gate
is open, to be field approved by City)
Tension or tensil, not compression
Corner post, 2-1/2” diameter,
for corner post see 5
Slope away from post
Top and bottom rail, 1-5/8” diameter pipe
Line post, 2-1/4” diameter pipe
Stretcher bar, typical
CHAIN LINK
DBL SWING GATE
CHAIN LINK
DBL SWING GATE
1 1
3 3
2 2
4 4
5 5 5
8 8
6 6
9 9
9 7
7 10
10 11
11 11
1 12
12 6
13 13
14 14 14
3 4
15 15
16 16
16 17
17 17
18 18
19 19
7 8
May 2024
158
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
PERIMETER FENCE M-04
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
BRACKET ENLARGEMENT
1-1/2"
3-1/2"
5"
Bracket (Typ)
1'-10" 6"
1. All wood to be rough sawn redwood. All posts shall be pressure treated.
2. Slope rails with grade, do not step.
3. Attach brackets with 10d common, galvanized nails.
4. Bracket shall be 18 gauge galvanized steel.
ELEVATION SECTION
3'-6"
Undisturbed native soil or
engineered fill per soils report
Concrete Footing
2% Min. slope
1'-2"
Dia.
2'-0" 3'-6"
7'-0" O.C. (Typ)
Finish Grade
4" x 4" Rail (Typ)
6" x 6" Post with
1" Chamfer (Typ)
NOTES:
Gravel Base
2"
May 2024
159
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
M-05 SOLID WASTE
TRASH ENCLOSURE
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
1. Pad shall be engineered to withstand 20,000 lbs. of direct force from a single truck axle.
2. Gates shall be solid metal with cane bolts sleeves in the open and closed position. Each gate, with a minimum total span 16’ shall swing open a minimum of 135° from closed position. Hung gates have a 4” clearance off the finished pad or apron and surrounding curb.
3. The trash enclosure pad shall be designed to drain to a sewer connection as approved by Oakley Disposal Co. A water connection may be required by the Contra Costa County Health Department.
4. The enclosure exterior shall comply with standard Conditions of Approval for commercial and industrial projects. No enclosure shall be installed behind parking spaces.
5. Only solid waste containers and recycle containers are allowed inside the enclosure. Grease storage bins, soiled rag storage, etc. shall never be stored in the enclosure.
6. Roof and gates shall be powder coated and match in color.
7. Non-sacrificial anti-graffiti coating shall be applied to all visible surfaces of trash enclosure.
NOTES:
16' *
(See Note 3)
Apron Pad
(See Note 1)
18'-0" *
* Inside Dimension
Enclosure Pad
(See Note 1)
Refuse
Bin
Refuse
Bin
135°
Gate Post (Typ) Gate (See
Note 3)
8'-0"
Apron
Pad
Conc. Block Cap
6" High Curb
6'-2"
4" Clr
8'-0"
10'-0" *
LEGEND:
FRONT ELEVATION
TOP VIEW
SIDE ELEVATION
3/8" Round bar
weld to frame
1/4" Plate at top &
bottom of active leaf
Concrete Block or Reinforced Masonry Block shall
be split face or decorative or the masonry be
painted or plastered to match the main building.
Receiving sleeve. Outside location 135° min. angle
from closed gate position.
Stanley or approved equal. Heavy duty surface
mounted external hinges, weld to metal angle.
ASC Pacific "HR-36" 18 GA G.I. Metal Panels, or
approved equal-Paint over shop prime.
Ideal 64-6813 or approved equal. Cane bolt &
keeper interior.
King Arch. Metals 30-100 Weldable slide bolt latch
or approved equal.
1-1/2" Square steel tube weld to frame at interior
(Typ)
4" Sq. x 1/4" Plate butt weld with rounded corners
for bolt latch.
Metal screen. Stainless woven wire mesh with max.
2" opening. Weld to 1-1/2" square steel tube frame
and weld 1-1/2" x 1/4" support plates as necessary
(Typ)
2 2
3 1
2' Clr
4 5
7 6 8
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
Gate (See
Note 3) 1 1
9 9
9 Metal roof required
by City Ordinance
May 2024
160
STD. PLAN NO.
DATE
NOT TO SCALE
M-06 OAK LEAF ANTISKATE GUARD
STD. PLAN NO.
NOT TO SCALE
TOP VIEW
SECTION
Match wall radius or chamfer Top of wall
Face of wall
6"
Cast silicon bronze
oak leaf decorative
anti-skate guard
3"
Match wall radius or chamfer
Face of wall
Cast silicon bronze
oak leaf decorative
anti-skate guard
Top of wall
1. Installation to be completed in accordance with manufacturer's specifications.
2. Anchor with two blind pin anchors provided. Use anchors in conjunction with two-part epoxy.
3. Space at 18” from end of planters/walls and approximately 36” on centers. Do not apply at grout joints.
4. Decorative anti-skate guard shall be as manufactured by Skate Stoppers, (619) 447-6374 or www.skatestoppers.com.
NOTES:
May 2024
161
Resolution No. __-24 Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. __-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE 2024 ENGINEERING STANDARD DETAILS
FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department is responsible for maintaining Standard Specifications and Engineering Standards Details establishing quality requirements and contract conditions for design and construction of infrastructure projects; and
WHEREAS, the Standard Specifications and Engineering Standards must be periodically updated to allow for changes in the design and construction practices, as the standards were created in 2016 and updated in 2021; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, by the City Council of the City of Oakley as follows:
a) The 2024 Engineering Standards, herein attached as Exhibit A and dated May 2024 are hereby approved, and
b) The previous editions of the Engineering Standards are hereby superseded, and the 2024 Engineering Standards Details approved herein shall be applicable to all projects following the approval of these standards, and
c) The City Engineer has the authority to make minor modifications to the standard plan details when necessary, and
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oakley at a meeting held on the 28th of May 2024 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
APPROVED:
_____________________
ATTEST: Anissa Williams, Mayor
_____________________ ________________
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
162
STAFF REPORT
1 City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: May 28, 2024
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Libby Vreonis, City Clerk/Paralegal
SUBJECT: Waive the First Reading and Introduce an Ordinance Adding Oakley Municipal Code Section 9.1.1230(d) to Address Outdoor and Indoor Marijuana Cultivation Exceeding Six Plants as Separate Offense Background and Analysis
Oakley Municipal Code Section 9.1.1230 addresses cultivation of marijuana. Outdoor cultivation of marijuana is prohibited and in accordance with State law, indoor cultivation is permitted for no more than six plants when cultivation strictly conforms to specific State requirements and regulations.
The proposed ordinance will clarify that each and every marijuana plant cultivated outdoors, or indoors in excess of six plants allowed by State law, is a separate offense and each will be subject to a separate administrative citation under Sections
1.5.002(e) and 4.41.108(b) added to the Oakley Municipal Code in March of this year. These sections allow for an administrative fine for unlicensed commercial cannabis activity not to exceed $1,000 per violation or $10,000 per day. The proposed ordinance would allow each and every marijuana plant cultivated outdoors, or indoors in excess of six plants allowed by State law, to be treated as a separate offense and subject to an administrative citation of $1,000 per plant or $10,000 per day.
Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
The proposed action is consistent with The City’s Community Health & Safety Goal.
Fiscal Impact
None.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council waive the first reading and introduce the proposed ordinance as presented or amended.
Attachments
1. Proposed Ordinance
Approved and
Forwarded to the
City Council
163
Ordinance No. X-24 Page 1 of
2 ORDINANCE NO. X-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY ADDING SECTION 9.1.1230(d) TO THE OAKLEY MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADDRESS
OUTDOOR AND INDOOR MARIJUANA CULTIVATION EXCEEDING SIX PLANTS
AS SEPARATE OFFENSE
WHEREAS,Oakley Municipal Code Section 9.1.1230 addresses cultivation of marijuana to prohibit outdoor cultivation of marijuana in accordance with State law and permits indoor cultivation of no more than six plants when cultivation strictly conforms to specific State requirements and regulations; and
WHEREAS, the proposed ordinance will clarify that each and every marijuana plant cultivated outdoors, or indoors in excess of six plants allowed by State law, is a separate offense and subject to a separate administrative citation under Oakley Municipal Code Sections 1.5.002(e) and 4.41.108(b).
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF OAKLEY MUNICIPAL CODE.
Oakley Municipal Code Section 9.1.1230(d) is hereby added as follows:
9.1.1230(d). Each and every marijuana plant cultivated outdoor, or in excess of the number of indoor plants allowed under this section, shall be a separate offense, and each such plant subject to a separate administrative citation fine under Oakley Municipal Code Sections 1.5.002(e) and 4.41.108(b). Each and every day a violation is maintained, caused, aided, abetted, concealed, suffered, or permitted is a separate offense.
SECTION 4. CEQA FINDING.
The City Council determines that the provisions of this ordinance are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) because the instant ordinance involves continuing administrative activities and thus is not a project, as CEQA defines, pursuant to Section 15378(b)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines. To the extent the adoption of this Ordinance constitutes a project, the City Council finds pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15061(b)(3) that the project is exempt from environmental review because it can be seen with certainty that the adoption of the ordinance would not have any significant impact on the environment.
SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining provisions, and the City Council declares that it would have adopted each provision of this ordinance 164
Ordinance No. X-24 Page 2 of
2 irrespective of the validity of any other provision.
SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after adoption.
SECTION 7. PUBLICATION.
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause this Ordinance or a summary thereof to be printed once within fifteen (15) days after its adoption in a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Oakley.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ________, 2024 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
Anissa Williams, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________ ____________________
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
165
STAFF REPORT
1 City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: May 28, 2024
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Libby Vreonis, City Clerk/Paralegal
SUBJECT: Waive the First Reading and Introduce an Ordinance to Add Oakley Municipal Code Section 4.41.120 to Include Administrative Hearing Requirements Related to Unlawful Commercial Cannabis Activity Background and Analysis
On March 12, 2024, the Oakley City Council adopted Ordinance 5-24 regarding administrative fines for unlicensed commercial cannabis activity and declared it a public nuisance. Administrative fines may be immediately imposed for violations of this ordinance not to exceed $1,000 per violation or $10,000 per day.
California Government Code Section 53069.4(a)(2)(E)(i, ii, iii) provides that if such an ordinance is adopted that it provide for a reasonable period of time for the correction or remedy of the violation prior to the administrative fines that are imposed after notice and a reasonable time to correct only when the property owner can substantiate all of the following: (1) a tenant is in possession of the property that is the subject matter of the administrative action, (2) the rental property owner or agent can provide evidence that the rental or lease agreement prohibits the commercial cannabis activity, and (3) the rental property owner or agent did not know the tenant was engaging in unlawful commercial cannabis activity and no complaint, property inspection, or other information caused the rental property owner or agent to have actual notice of the unlawful commercial cannabis activity.
If an administrative violation is found for unlawful commercial cannabis activity, the property owner is mailed a Notice of Violation and/or administrative fine imposed by the City. The property owner has the right to appeal administrative fines to an administrative hearing officer. The proposed addition of this ordinance incorporates the three requirements mentioned above that the property owner would have to substantiate during the administrative hearing. Failure to meet any or all of the requirements would result in the administrative fine being upheld. The ordinance would comply with the provisions of this statute, provide due process, and clarify such process as set forth above.
Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
The proposed action is consistent with The City’s Community Health & Safety Goal.
Approved and
Forwarded to the
City Council
166
STAFF REPORT
4882-2285-8658.1 CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 2 O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US Fiscal Impact
None.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council waive the first reading and introduce the proposed ordinance.
Attachments
1. Proposed Ordinance
167
Ordinance No. X-24 Page 1 of
2 ORDINANCE NO. X-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY ADDING SECTION 4.41.120 TO THE OAKLEY MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCLUDE
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO UNLICENSED
COMMERCIAL CANNABIS ACTIVITY
WHEREAS, the Oakley City Council adopted Ordinance 5-24 regarding administrative fines for unlicensed commercial cannabis activity and declared it a public nuisance on March 12, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the ordinance allows for administrative fines for unlicensed commercial cannabis activity not to exceed $1,000 per violation or $10,000 per day; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 53069.4(a)(2)(E)(i, ii, iii) provides that if such an ordinance is adopted that it provide for a reasonable period of time for the correction or remedy of the violation prior to the administrative fines that are imposed after notice and a reasonable time to correct only when the property owner can substantiate all requirements as set forth by this statute; and WHEREAS, incorporating the requirements of California Government Code Section 53069.4(a)(2)(E)(i, ii, iii) complies with provisions of state law, provides due process, and clarifies such process.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF OAKLEY MUNICIPAL CODE.
Oakley Municipal Code Section 4.41.120 is hereby added as follows:
4.41.120 Administrative Hearing Requirements.
Any property owner that can substantiate before an administrative hearing officer that all of the following are true shall be provided a reasonable period of time for the correction or remedy of the violation prior to the imposition of administrative fines or penalties:
a. A tenant is in possession of the property that is the subject of the administrative action. b. The rental property owner or agent can provide evidence that the rental or lease agreement prohibits the commercial cannabis activity.
c. The rental property owner or agent did not know the tenant was engaging in unlawful commercial cannabis activity and no complaint, property inspection, or other information caused the rental property owner or agent to have actual notice of the unlawful commercial cannabis activity.
168
Ordinance No. X-24 Page 2 of
2 SECTION 4. CEQA FINDING.
The City Council determines that the provisions of this ordinance are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) because the instant ordinance involves continuing administrative activities and thus is not a project, as CEQA defines, pursuant to Section 15378(b)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines. To the extent the adoption of this Ordinance constitutes a project, the City Council finds pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15061(b)(3) that the project is exempt from environmental review because it can be seen with certainty that the adoption of the ordinance would not have any significant impact on the environment.
SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining provisions, and the City Council declares that it would have adopted each provision of this ordinance irrespective of the validity of any other provision.
SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after adoption.
SECTION 7. PUBLICATION.
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause this Ordinance or a summary thereof to be printed once within fifteen (15) days after its adoption in a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Oakley.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ________, 2024 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
Anissa Williams, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________ ____________________
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
169
May 21, 2024
Mr. Josh McMurray, City Manager
City of Oakley
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
RE: Monthly update - The Oaks Rental Community
Dear Josh:
Per the request of Councilmembers Aaron Meadows and Shannon Shaw, I am submitting the update for the month of May 2024. After your review, should you have further questions, please feel free to contact me. I will be attending the next resident meeting, which is still being scheduled for the last week of June. I am looking forward to another opportunity to connect directly with the residents.
We will provide our next update one week prior to the second regularly scheduled City Council meeting in June.
Sincerely,
Oke Johnson
Executive Vice President
Winn Residential
170
THE OAKS
An Affordable Housing Community
Staff
POSITION NAME CONTACT INFO
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ Onsite Property Manager Karla Aguilar [email protected] or 925-625-1300 Regional Property Manager Katherine Aguirre [email protected] Divisional Vice President Sheyla Batres [email protected] Oke Johnson Executive Vice President [email protected] _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Administrative staff consists of an Assistant Property Manager, Bookkeeper, Community Coordinator and three Occupancy Specialists.
Maintenance staff consists of Maintenance Supervisor (currently open) and six maintenance technicians (two open positions). Three positions open in total.
We encourage anyone who is interested in the position to apply at: https://www.winncompanies.com/careers _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Occupancy & Collections
Physical Economic
Buildings Occupancy Occupancy
Oak Creek 51 & 49 75% 74.43%
The Commons 53 & 59 76% 75.92%
Oak Grove Terrace 65 81% 75.09%
Oak Place 67 76% 91.54%
Oak Forest 81 77% 93.94%
Oak Meadows 69 95% 78.23%
Oak Ridge 73 86% 85.42%
*Physical Occupancy = occupancy expressed as a percentage based on occupied units divided by total units *Economic Occupancy = occupancy expressed as a percentage based on charged rent divided by collected rent The staff is working on 25 new applications currently with a goal of each property to be in the mid 90% by June 30.
Administration
Legal
• 18 residents are eviction for nonpayment of rent and other lease violations.
Compliance & Recertifications
• 46 annual recertifications completed in March
• 30 annual recertifications completed in April
• 25 annual certifications due in May and 20 have been completed, 5 pending completion • 37 annual certifications due in June and 24 have been completed, 13 Pending completion • 37 annual certifications due in July and 20 have been completed, 17 pending completion 171
Resident Engagement
Resident Meetings
• Meeting May 17th was led by the Regional Manager.
AGENDA
Community Updates - Clubroom renovations end date 5/22/2024 for 59 and 65, sidewalk repairs, lighting improvements, doors & locks, Landscaping, Oak Tree Preservation in the Heritage Grove area.
Maintenance – How to report a service request, emergency situations and what to do, and ongoing maintenance schedule for the whole property
Parking – New parking policies will be distributed on 6/3/2024 and effective 8/1/2024 Resident Events – Summer BBQ and Donut Day
Resident Services – Reminder about all services offered free to all Upcoming Meetings –June 21st
Open Discussion – Comments, questions, suggestions
Requests for: Update of common space in building 59, request for updated laundry equipment, speed bumps and new play equipment for 53
Next Meeting – week of June 24th
The minutes from the meetings will be available for all residents no later than Friday, 5/24, in email form and in written form.
Email Communications
• Email Office Announcements
o Weekly, five emails are sent regarding topics such as:
Reporting maintenance needs
Upcoming events & reminders
Monthly newsletter
Leasing & Recertification reminders
• System generated nightly “Blast”
o Each night a brief email is sent to residents who have opted in and can be customized to fit a specific need.
Resident Events
• SUMMER KICKOFF - 5/14/2024 6 – 8 pm
o BBQ, raffle, music and games
o 125 residents in attendance
o Menu served – barbeque meats, corn on the cob, mac and cheese, salad and dessert o 20 residents won raffle prizes
• UPCOMING EVENTS
o Donut Day- 5/23/24
o Food Distribution- 5/20/24
Repairs & Maintenance
Capital Projects - 1st Quarter – Completed
• Landscape– Weed control, tree and shrubbery trimming, dead brush removal, edging and mowing, irrigation repairs
• Lighting - Interior & exterior inspections for photocells & bulbsreplacement, timer adjustments for daylight savings, major repairs were coordinated with an outside vendor, • Sidewalk Repairs & Replacement – ongoing process for improvement and replacement of broken concrete • Clubroom Improvements – Buildings 59, 65, 67, 81– flooring, painting, furniture 172
Capital Projects – 2nd Quarter – Underway
• Clubroom Improvements – Buildings 59, 65, 67 – all new furniture purchased and installed. • Heritage Grove area Maintenance
• Spring cleaning of Buildings- Currently addressing interior doors, floor repairs, lighting replacements and cleaning of lens covers
• Balcony Inspections – Balconies scheduled to be inspected by 5/31/2024. • Building & Unit Inspections – HVAC, roofs, windows, fascia, stucco and common area building inspections to be completed in June. Common area building inspections completed and all life & safety items have been repaired. Non-urgent items will be scheduled for completion in 3rd quarter. Unit inspections are scheduled for July and August.
• Tree Removal – At risk trees have been removed.
• Trash Compactor replacement – New compactor was installed on May 2nd. All new trash carts were received at the same time.
Day-to-day Maintenance
The property continued to make progress on closing out aging work orders, with 97 more works orders completed in April than were reported to the office. The property continues to balance resolving older service requests with non-emergency requests which are received.
March Service Request
• 96 new work orders were reported in March
• 295 work orders were completed in March
April Service Request
• 152 new work orders were reported in April
• 249 work orders were completed in April
Keys, Locks & Doors
• Monthly doors and locks inspections have occurred to ensure keys operate properly, doors open and close properly.
o Common area doors are inspected weekly, most recently on 5/13/2024 and 5/6/2024 with no findings.
o Inspection on Monday, 5/20, identified one door not properly working. The door is currently secure, additional repairs by a locksmith are scheduled for Friday, 5/24.
Cameras
• All camera systems were inspected last on 5/20/2024 and all were operational. Inspections occur biweekly on Monday.
Gates
• The motherboard on the communication system was vandalized on 4/19/2024 and the vehicle gates have not been operating properly. The vendor was contacted to assist, and they are researching solutions.
They have to find a compatible motherboard for replacement. Camera footage has been requested to prosecute the vandals.
Enhanced Resident Service Programming
May
• During the month of April, staff at The Oaks provided ten unique resident service events and eight in May (as of 5/21). Examples include:
173
o Regular community meetings. May 17th with upper management, next meeting to be held June 21, April 23rd with office management. Senior representative meeting held 4/4/2024, next one scheduled 5/24/2024.
o Emergency and Safety Workshops
o Distribution of baked goods from Panera Bread every Wednesday o Community BBQ
o Zumba class
o Food box distribution for shelf stable goods
o Food Bank distribution for fresh goods
o Upcoming - Donut Day, A’s baseball opener
Ongoing enhanced services, free of charge to the residents include:
• After School Programming
This program is open to school age children 5 – 17, five days per week for 3 hours and is free of charge to the resident and children.
• Scholarships
Scholarships are available for continuing education, advanced education, and certification programs.
Applications are available in the management office.
• Adult Programming
Programs are open to all residents. Some programming is specific to seniors 55 years or older. The programs are designed to support the needs of the seniors aging in place.
Examples of enhanced ongoing programming will include:
• Adult computer classes
• Employment development
• Healthy Lifestyle & Living classes
• Art classes
• Advanced Healthcare Directives, Wills & Trusts, Scam Prevention • Financial Literacy classes - reducing monthly costs – cable, cell phones, insurance, RX costs, reduced utility costs through the CARES program, free and reduced eyeglasses, free tax preparations
• Food Security
Food security exists when all people, at all times, have physical, social and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meets dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life. Our programs are based on these fundamentals and include access to free food giveaways. • Free foods are provided to the seniors on Wednesday and Fridays each week. Families have the same opportunity on Tuesdays of each week. The food is donated from local agencies and religious organizations. Fresh produce, pantry items, bakery items, eggs, canned goods, dry produce are among the many items the residents can choose from and rely upon. • Antioch Unified School District Meal Program provides one daily meal to children who have signed up to participate in this service. This is free of charge to parents. 174
STAFF REPORT
City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: May 28, 2024
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Harumi Murata, Economic Development Analyst
SUBJECT: Exploring Funding Options for Local Startups and Small Businesses Background and Analysis
The City of Oakley is committed to fostering the growth of local startups and small businesses, understanding that access to capital is crucial for their success. With ARPA funding ceasing, it is an opportune moment to explore alternative funding avenues to sustain this support, a testament to our commitment to the local business community.
This report presents not just potential strategies and funding sources but also a roadmap to a more robust financial support framework for the Oakley business community. These strategies have the potential to sustain and accelerate the growth of our local businesses, painting a promising picture for the future.
During the January 23, 2024 Meeting, staff was directed to identify funding options for small businesses and detailed the support already extended to nonprofits and businesses. Currently, the City directly supports local businesses in several key areas:
a. Retail and Light Industrial Improvement Programs
Launched in 2023, this program is aimed at directly investing & stimulating urban renewal and economic development. The City received 14 applications for commercial projects, wherein each business owner is pledging to invest at least $611,800 in their properties. Five businesses have completed the project and received the grant so far.
b. Small Business Recovery Grant
During the first cohort, 16 qualified local businesses received the grant, a total of $55,000. Grant recommendations were set at either $2,500 (for businesses with less than $100,000 annual revenue) or $5,000 (for businesses with greater than $100,000 annual revenue), providing a significant financial boost to these businesses. Currently, the second cohort application is open. c. Oakley Entrepreneur Center
The Oakley Entrepreneur Center, launched in 2020, directly supports local entrepreneurs in downtown Oakley. Designed as a resource for growing start-ups Approved and
Forwarded to the
City Council
175
STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 2
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US and home-based businesses, the 2,200-square-foot facility offers affordable, fully furnished office space, including private offices, conference rooms, co-working areas, copiers, and internet connectivity, providing a less capital-intensive option than traditional office spaces.
d. Downtown Revitalization Loans
Launched in 2019 to revitalize the downtown commercial development, it offered up to $75,000 in low-interest loans. These loans supported façade improvements, including signage, lighting, landscaping, etc. Three businesses received funding divided into two: a conventional loan of $37,500 at 2% interest and a forgivable $37,500 grant. However, the program's complex loan structure necessitated extensive documentation, payment collection, and administration efforts. Two projects are still within the first three years of their payment schedules, and they requested deferrals. They also claimed debt burden, especially during Covid, ROI uncertainty, benefiting the landlord rather than the business.
The Role of the City in Small Business Financing
Traditionally, financing small businesses has been the domain of banks, investors, and other financial entities. However, the City has a supportive role to play, which includes:
Educating small businesses about financial resources. Connecting businesses with federal, state, and private funding programs. Providing technical assistance.
Collaborating with local financial institutions to enhance access to financing. Despite our efforts, small businesses often encounter various barriers to securing capital. These include a lack of collateral, poor credit scores, financial literacy, and business planning costs. Additionally, broader economic issues such as rising interest rates and regional disparities in access to finance services complicate these challenges.
Proposed Programs and Strategies
Outlined below are a selection of programs and strategies frequently implemented by municipalities:
1. Federal Economic Adjustment Assistance Grants for Revolving Loan Funds (RLFs)
Pursue EAA grants to establish RLFs that provide loans to businesses unable to secure traditional financing. RLFs would focus on job creation and leveraging other capital sources.
2. Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs) 176
STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 3
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US Partner with CDFIs like ICA, Working Solutions, and AnewAmerica to facilitate loans and provide mentorship to underserved entrepreneurs, focusing on minorities and women.
3. Angel Investment and Venture Capital
Encourage local businesses to engage with Bay Area-based angel investors and venture capitalists who focus on high-potential startups, offering both capital and strategic guidance.
4. Crowdfunding Platforms
Promote equity crowdfunding as a viable option for startups to raise funds from a broader audience, highlighting platforms like Kickstarter and Indiegogo.
5. Federal and State Funding Programs
Maximize the use of SBA loans and HUD programs to provide diverse funding options for small businesses, from microloans to substantial real estate financing.
6. California State Funding Programs
Leverage state programs such as the Industrial Development Bonds and CalCAP to facilitate low-interest loans and other financial incentives.
7. Tourism and Economic Development Initiatives
Explore the potential for utilizing Transit Occupancy Tax revenues to fund business development tied to tourism, should hotel activity in Oakley increase.
Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
This item is consistent with the Strategic Plan 27+ Community and Economic Development goals.
Fiscal Impact
No immediate financial impact on the City’s budget at this time.
Staff Recommendation
The City Council is requested to guide the implementation of strategies to improve access to financing for local startups and small businesses. 177