Oakley City Council
July 9, 2024

AGENDA

REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY

COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/OAKLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
Tuesday, July 09, 2024
6:30 PM
Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California 94561.

Unless stated otherwise on the agenda, every item on the agenda is exempt from CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15378, 15301, 15323 and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065.

MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley will create a resilient future that fosters and attracts a vibrant and evolving community that welcomes and values all people.

VISION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley celebrates our unique Delta lifestyle and small-town feel where we Live in a safe, dynamic community, Work together to build the future, and Play in our own backyard.

Agendas are posted in Oakley at Oakley City Hall-3231 Main Street, outside the gym at Delta Vista Middle School-4901 Frank Hengel Way and outside the Library at Freedom High School-1050 Neroly Road.

Agendas are also posted on the City’s Internet Website www.ci.oakley.ca.us.

A complete packet of information containing staff reports and exhibits related to each item is available for public review prior to an Oakley City Council and/or City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority meeting at Oakley City Hall, 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Oakley City Council, Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency or Oakley Public Financing Authority regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection, during regular business hours, at the front counter in the Main Lobby of the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Agendas may be picked up at the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 for no charge. To request information regarding placement on the City’s agenda e-mail distribution list, please contact us at (925) 625-7000.

The City of Oakley provides social media options to stay connected to City Hall through Facebook, Twitter, Next Door and Instagram. Other opportunities to connect with City Hall include Envision Oakley, Oakley OnDemand on the City's website, and by emailing [email protected].

If you require special accommodation, please call the City Clerk’s office at (925) 625-7000 before the 1 meeting or contact City staff at the meeting.

Please keep cell phones/electronic devices turned off during the meeting. Please be advised that City Council meetings are video recorded and attendees may appear on video.

Information Regarding Public Comment
Members of the public may address the Council on items of interest that are within the City’s jurisdiction. In compliance with State law, the council may not take action or have discussion on any item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. Public comment on items not listed on the agenda will be heard under the Public Comments section of the agenda. Public comments on items listed on the agenda will be heard as the Mayor calls the items. In compliance with State law, the Council may not take action on an item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. If you would like to speak on any agenda item, please fill out a public speaker card available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk seated in the Council Chamber prior to the agenda item being called. The Mayor will call you by name to the podium to hear your comment.

PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES. Online public comments are accepted until 5 p.m. the day of the meeting and can be submitted at
https://www.ci.oakley.ca.us/online-public-comment-card/.

1.OPENING MATTERS
Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority

1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority

1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag

1.3 Proclamation Recognizing July as Parks and Recreation Month (Jesse Dela Cruz, Public Works Maintenance Manager and Troy Faulk, Recreation Manager) Proclamation

1.4 Tri-Delta Transit Update (Toan Tran, COO, Tri-Delta Transit)

1.5 Update from Contra Costa Transportation Authority Citizens Advisory Committee (Kai-Christian Torf, Committee Member)
2 1.6 Presentation on Oakley Veterans' Needs (Roy Manning, Assistant Commander/Service Officer for American Legion Post 202)

2.PUBLIC COMMENTS
At this time, the public is permitted to address the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority on non-agendized items.

3.COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS

4.CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are typically non-controversial in nature and are considered for approval by the Oakley City Council/ Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority with one single action. Members of the audience, Staff or the Oakley City Council/ Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority who would like an item removed from the Consent Calendar for purposes of public input may request the Mayor remove the item. The public may request to remove an item(s) to provide input by completing a public speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk prior to the item(s) being called by the Mayor.

4.1 Approve the Minutes of the Special Oakley City Council Meeting held June 11, 2024 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)
Minutes 06-11-24Sp

4.2 Approve Minutes from the Regular Joint City Council/City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency/ Public Financing Authority Meeting held June 11, 2024 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)
Minutes 06-11-24Reg

4.3 Report Out of Closed Session Memo (Derek Cole, City Attorney) Memo

4.4 Accept the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023/24 Fourth Quarter Report on the Capital Improvement Program (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
Staff Report
3 4.5 Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Contract to Quality Sound for the Civic Center Amphitheater Sound System Project – CIP No. 319 (Troy Faulk, Recreation Manager)
Staff Report

1. Resolution

2. Proposal-Quality Sound

4.6 Adopt a Resolution Establishing Special Speed Zones for Specific City Streets (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report

1. Resolution

2. Engineering and Traffic Survey

4.7 Adopt a Resolution Approving a Consulting Services Agreement between the City of Oakley and TRB and Associates, Inc. for On-Call services Related to Code Compliance Plan Review and Inspection Services for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 (Ken Strelo, Community Development Director)
Staff Report

1. TRB Statement of Qualifications

2. Draft Agreement

3. Proposed Resolution

4.8 Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Contract to CivicPlus for the Design, Hosting and Maintenance of a New City Website (Danielle Navarro, Assistant City Manager)
Staff Report

1. Proposed Resolution

2. Proposed Agreement

4.9 Adopt a Resolution for the Award of a Construction Agreement with R&R Pacific Construction, Inc. for the construction of the Laurel Road Widening (Cloverbrook Avenue to O’Hara Avenue) Project – Capital Improvement Project Number 280 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report

1. Resolution

2. Bid Summary Results

4.10 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to execute an amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with BKF Engineers, Inc. to provide Additional Design and Construction Support Services for the Laurel Road Widening (Cloverbrook Avenue to O’Hara Avenue) Project – Capital 4 Improvement Project Number 280 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
Staff Report

1. BKF Amendment Proposal

2. Resolution

4.11 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Consulting Services Agreement with BSK Associates to Provide Materials Testing and Special Inspections for the East Cypress Road Widening (Knightsen Avenue to Jersey Island Road) Project – Capital Improvement Project Number 247 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
Staff Report

1. Resolution

2. BSK Proposal

4.12 Creating Zone 192 within the Oakley Special Police Tax Area consisting of the Rosewood Estates project (Subdivision 8787) located at 4073 Rose Avenue (APN 035-220-035-6) (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report

1. Resolution
1A. Exhibit A - Diagram

2. Ordinance
1A. Exhibit A - Diagram
2B. Exhibit B - Rate Schedule

5.PUBLIC HEARINGS

5.1 Waive the First Reading and Introduce an Ordinance Amending Oakley Municipal Code Sections 9.1.404.c.9 and 9.1.1238.b.6 (Zoning Text Amendments – Winery-Related Uses and Carwash Highway Buffers) (RZ 02-24) (Ken Strelo, Community Development Director)
CEQA Determination: Find the project is categorically exempt under the “Common Sense” Exemption (14 Cal. Code Regs./CEQA Guideline § 15061(b)(3))
Suggested Action: Staff Recommendation: 1) Receive the Staff Report, 2) Receive Questions from the City Council, 3) Open the Public Hearing, 4) Receive Public Testimony, 5) Close the Public Hearing, 6) Deliberate, 7) Summarize the Deliberation 8) Waive the First Reading and Introduce the Ordinance
Staff Report

1. Notice of Public Hearing

2. Planning Commission Resolution 9-24
5 3. Draft Ordinance

5.2 Waive the First Reading and Introduce an Ordinance recommending the City Council approve the project titled, “Bernard Corners Rezone (RZ 01-24)” (Evan Gorman, Associate Planner)
CEQA Determination: Find that the project is categorically exempt under the CEQA “Common Sense” Exemption (14 Cal. Code Regs./CEQA Guidelines § 15061(b)(3))
Suggested Action: Staff Recommendation: 1) Receive the Staff Report, 2) Receive Questions from the City Council, 3) Open the Public Hearing, 4) Receive Comments from the Applicant, 5) Receive Public Testimony, 6) Close the Public Hearing, 7) Deliberate, 8) Summarize the Deliberation 9) Waive the First Reading and Introduce the Ordinance
Staff Report

1. Vicinity Map

2. Notice of Public Hearing

3. Planning Commission Resolution 11-24

4. Draft Ordinance

5.3 Adopt a resolution approving the project titled Oakley Village Subdivision 9577 Tentative Map Extension (TME 01-24) (Evan Gorman, Associate Planner) CEQA Determination: Find that the project is within the scope of the previously conducted environmental review for the approved tentative map and that no further review is necessary.

Suggested Action: Staff Recommendation: 1) Receive the Staff Report, 2) Receive Questions from the City Council, 3) Open the Public Hearing, 4) Receive Comments from the Applicant, 5) Receive Public Testimony, 6) Close the Public Hearing, 7) Deliberate, 8) Summarize the Deliberation 9) Adopt the Resolution Staff Report

1. Vicinity Map

2. Notice of Public Hearing

3. Approved Tentative Map

4. Planning Commission Resolution 13-24

5. Draft Resolution

5.4 Waive the First Reading and Introduce an Ordinance Approving the Burroughs Subdivision 9557 Development Agreement Amendment (DA 01-24) and Adopt a Resolution approving the Burroughs Subdivision 9557 Tentative Map Extension (TME 02-24) (Ken Strelo, Community Development Director) 6 CEQA Determination: Find that the project is within the scope of the previously conducted environmental review for the approved tentative map and that no further review is necessary.

Suggested Action: Staff Recommendation: 1) Receive the Staff Report, 2) Receive Questions from the City Council, 3) Open the Public Hearing, 4) Receive Comments from the Applicant, 5) Receive Public Testimony, 6) Close the Public Hearing, 7) Deliberate, 8) Summarize the Deliberation 9) Waive the First Reading and Introduce the Ordinance, 10) Adopt the Resolution
Staff Report

1. Vicinity Map

2. Notice of Public Hearing

3. Approved Tentative Map 9557

4. Proposed Resolution

5. Proposed Ordinance
5a. Proposed Development Agreement (Second) Amendment

6.REGULAR CALENDAR

6.1 Adopt a Resolution to Establish an Oakley Senior Center Specific Sub-Committee (Joshua McMurray, City Manager)
Staff Report

1. Draft Resolution

7.REPORTS

7.1 CITY MANAGER
(a) City Manager
(b) Business License Update
(c) Report from the Oaks Apartments
(d) Tyler ERP Conversion Update (Holly Sitton Orognen, Senior Project Manager, KOA Hills Consulting)
(b) June New Business Licenses
(c) Report from the Oaks Apartments

7.2 OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a) Reports from Council Liaisons to Regional Committees, Commissions and Boards AND Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency
(b) Requests for Future Agendas
7 8.WORK SESSIONS

9.ADJOURN
8 Proclamation
Park and Recreation Month
WHEREAS, parks and recreation is an integral part of communities throughout this country, including Oakley; and WHEREAS, parks and recreation promotes health and wellness, improving the physical and mental health of people who live near parks; and
WHEREAS, parks and recreation promotes time spent in nature, which positively impacts mental health by increasing cognitive performance and well-being, and alleviating illnesses such as depression, attention deficit disorders, and Alzheimer’s; and
WHEREAS, parks and recreation encourages physical activities by providing space for popular sports, hiking trails, swimming pools and many other activities designed to promote active lifestyles; and WHEREAS, parks and recreation is a leading provider of healthy meals, nutrition services and education; and WHEREAS, park and recreation programming and education activities, such as out-of-school time programming, youth sports and environmental education, are critical to childhood development; and WHEREAS, parks and recreation increases a community’s economic prosperity through increased property values, expansion of the local tax base, increased tourism, the attraction and retention of businesses, and crime reduction; and WHEREAS, parks and recreation is fundamental to the environmental well-being of our community; and WHEREAS, parks and recreation is essential and adaptable infrastructure that makes our communities resilient in the face of natural disasters and climate chance; and
WHEREAS, our parks and natural recreation areas ensure the ecological beauty of our community and provide a place for children and adults to connect with nature and recreate outdoors; and WHEREAS, the U.S. House of Representatives has designated July as parks and Recreation Month; and WHEREAS, Oakley recognizes the benefits derived from parks and recreation resources.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Anissa Williams, Mayor of the City of Oakley along with the members of the Oakley City Council, recognize July as Park and Recreation month in the City of Oakley.

July 9, 2024
___________________
Anissa Williams, Mayor
9 Minutes the Special Meeting of the Oakley City Council held June 11, 2024
1) Call to Order and Roll Call
Mayor Anissa Williams called the special meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. in the Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California. Vice Mayor Shannon Shaw and Councilmembers Dr. George Fuller, Hugh Henderson and Aaron Meadows were also present.
2) Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
Mayor Williams led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 3) Public Comments
None.
4) Closed Session

4.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Schaefers v. BNSF Railway Company et. al. (and City of Oakley), Contra Costa Sup. Ct. Case Nos. C22-01552 and C22-01555
Mayor Williams announced the closed session item and indicated that after closed session, the meeting will adjourn. She announced the Regular Joint Meeting of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority will be held here this evening beginning at 6:30 p.m.

There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:16 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted,
Libby Vreonis
City Clerk
10 Minutes of the Regular Joint Meeting of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority held June 11, 2024
1) OPENING MATTERS

1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority
Mayor Anissa Williams called the regular meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California. Vice Mayor Shannon Shaw and Councilmembers Dr. George Fuller, Hugh Henderson and Aaron Meadows were also present.

1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag (Boy Scout Troop 152) Four members of Troop 152 led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

1.3 Presentation of Proclamations

1. Juneteenth (Odessa LeFrancois and Michael Dupray, East Contra Costa County NAACP) The proclamation was mailed to the recipients as they were unable to attend the meeting.

2. LGBTQ+ Pride Month (Jeanette Ruddick, East Bay LGBTQIA Teen and Family Support Group) Mayor Williams presented the proclamation for LGBTQ+ Pride Month to Jeanette Ruddick and members of the East Bay LGBTQIA Teen and Family Support Group.

Ms. Ruddick shared information regarding the history of Pride Month and the importance of this month to honor the impact of events and advocate for rights. She thanked the Council for its support.

1.4 Update from Contra Costa Transportation Authority Citizens Advisory Committee (Kai-Christian Torf)
Mayor Williams announced this update has been rescheduled to July 9. 11 2) PUBLIC COMMENTS
Roger Mammon provided information on the Delta including that the site reservoir project has been fast tracked, ignoring CEQA, and in speaking with Barbara at Protect the Delta, things will be happening to protect the Delta. He mentioned a lot of the meetings regarding the Delta occur on Tuesdays; the Delta Heritage Authority Area Management Plan Advisory Committee will meet Tuesday, June 18, 1:30pm-3:30pm, at the Rio Vista Senior Center, and today there was a meeting at the Big Break Center Just Transitions in the Delta to discuss what people feel about the Delta and what can be done to address various things going on. He mentioned he noticed that they didn’t talk about reducing exports; they talked about what could be done to spend more money to fix it. He mentioned the next meeting will be in about 9-10 months in Rio Vista or Walnut Grove.

Roxanne Warner commented that as a licensed psychiatric technician and single mother of two successful adult children, we all know life is challenging and even more challenging today. She requested the Council highly consider the needs of heroic veterans and seniors of our community who have taught others, raised children, and fought for our freedom in wars to provide quality of life for all of us. She mentioned that the Older Americans Act places high regard with communities that cater to its seniors by utilizing widely used senior centers, services such as social and health benefits, resources, building of increased friendship, increases in healthier meal planning, nutrition availability, fitness, transportation services, integrational programs, and being of service to all in the community. She explained that all of this incorporates renewal of sense of purpose for veterans and seniors, decreases isolation, lowers depression, and decreases substance abuse, for overall quality of life and longevity. She shared that many veterans and seniors have minimum availability to skills available to children and teens. She commented that veterans and seniors deserve to have a face with a concrete structure and dependability to build a better sense of purpose to hand down as an example to future generations. She mentioned seniors need less chaos, less interruptions, and more structure, so they too can continue to thrive. She explained intimacy gets lost in large, bureaucratic, government-run buildings where everything is shared. She mentioned the only investment she brings is a heart for service so seniors and veterans can exude their duty to be the best examples for future generations. She asked the Council to please consider all avenues to the decision-making process of an adequate, well thought out plan for them so they may relocate appropriately to do their jobs well for the community. She inquired if their name is good for funding and if they do not deserve adequate space with their needs met. She mentioned that better purpose, thriving, and quality of life lived, is the best example they can give to children today.

Allan Perry commented that he has 35 signatures on a petition from people that wish to have the food program at the Senior Center continue. He shared that every week they see new faces in their line, some avoid contact because they are embarrassed to be in a food line, some come as early as 5:30am to get in line for tickets they distribute at 9am, and at 8am, there is not a parking space available and the line is around the building, often with 75-80 people in line, serving 300 families; they don’t want to stand in line with walkers and canes, but need to stand in line as that might be the only food they get for the week. He added that many walk from the area because they don’t have a car and to end the program would put a lot of those in the neighborhood around the Senior Center in hardship. He mentioned there are more than 11,000 senior centers in the United States with 586 in California. He shared information regarding cities that have smaller populations than Oakley that have senior centers.

Mike Castro commented that on May 1, they had meeting and Donna Baker asked about where seniors are going to be and City Manager Joshua McMurray said this is not time or place to talk 12 about it, and again on May 15, he asked Mr. McMurray, and the same thing was said to him. He mentioned he told Mr. McMurray if seniors are asked to park across the street that it is an accident waiting to happen to which Mr. McMurray said it wasn’t. He commented that he obviously doesn’t know seniors because it is. He mentioned this was on May 21 and he believes Mr. McMurray mentioned this was the first he had heard of it so the seniors can’t believe what comes out of his mouth anymore; they feel he is not for the seniors but just for the library and funds, so they feel he should be replaced with a better person that is for the seniors also which they don’t believe he is.

Chris Paloma, Field Representative with Carpenters Local Union 152 in Martinez covering Contra Costa County, requested the Council implement labor standards in Oakley. He mentioned there is tax fraud across the city, county, and state amounting to $8.4 billion per year. He explained that workers are building the homes we live in, yet they are being taken advantage of, they are not receiving livable wages, not receiving health care, and not able to join an apprenticeship program to better their situation. He mentioned there is no compliance, even prevailing wage projects still do not provide health care; those contractors are putting it on the check and health care is still project to project. He shared that this is back-breaking work, with shifts sometimes 12-hours in the heat, for minimum wage. He explained that tax fraud hurts all of us as taxes go toward things such as building bridges and schools in our communities. He mentioned having pre-qualification language to require contractors not only to pay prevailing wage, but also provide health care to workers, and to help enforce the provisions, as the DIR is spread too thin for enforcement. He added he would love to sit down and discuss these things with any Councilmembers.

William Carpenter commented that soon, the City will demolish the current Senior Center building to build more low-income housing. He mentioned as a disabled veteran and more senior than the average, he appreciates the opportunity to visit the senior center which is geared toward his generation. He mentioned living alone and independently, he welcomes the opportunity to visit and socialize with those of his generation as they share the same experiences and interests. He mentioned it is a place he can go once a week to share a balanced meal with others and swap stories. He agreed the new library and community center are needed but asked if it should it be at the expense of seniors. He suggested one of the proposed buildings be expanded to two stories to accommodate a separate Senior Center while keeping the other planned facilities. He mentioned that the City currently envisions the Senior Center as having a couple of office spaces housed either by the Recreation Center or proposed library/community center with no space for the functions and services conducted solely for the senior community, and in his opinion, adequate parking has not been proposed adjacent to the proposed library that would accommodate elderly and handicapped, especially if a Tri-Delta Transit stop is created there. He added that the City indicates that a parking lot located one or more blocks away isn’t a problem for seniors with mobility issues. He mentioned the City says it has insufficient funding for seniors and that seniors and veterans are not involved in securing funding for the separate senior facility. He asked the public if this is not the function of City leadership that values their older citizens or are they just using the Senior Center and veterans as a ruse to get funding. He mentioned seniors still have value and want to share; they still have meaning and worth. He urged the Oakley public to get involved as they too will be seniors some day; their needs and wants are being cast aside and they can see what is happening to the seniors, know it can happen to them, say it is not right, and support their fathers, grandfathers, and as in his case, great-grandfathers, many whom helped build this community. He mentioned they need a facility large enough to accommodate the functions of the senior community, run by seniors who understand the issues of growing old and the special needs they have, a facility that provides services geared for the older is what is needed to be called an Oakley Senior Center. He mentioned they do not need a small office space in a corner of a library just as many young folks want to hide old things or no longer use or value. 13 Donna Baker commented that she appreciates the hard work that has gone in so far for our community and she applauds the effort that has gone in so far for the library/Senior Center building. She mentioned she understands that for the City to qualify for grants it needs to include seniors and veterans. She suggested the seniors keep the current location of the Senior Center and the lot adjacent to it that has already been given to the City, and together they apply for the grants so the seniors may continue to use the property, and depending upon the funding, the seniors may or may not have to use a small portion of that $7.5 million set aside just for the library. She mentioned available state and federal grants include grants for senior centers, for Older Americans Act, for veteran groups, and transportation. She added that meanwhile, they can temporarily move library items to temporary classroom portables already owned by the library to a City property of the City’s choice, to allow Freedom High School their space and have temporary space for the library, a win for the Liberty Union High School District, for Freedom High School, for the Oakley Seniors, for the veterans, for 4-H, for the Food Bank to continue meeting needs of citizens, for Meals on Wheels that operates out of the Senior Center building, for CoCo Café which eventually wants to expand its program to 5 days a week, for public transportation, and most of all for the Friends of the Oakley Library because it will give them the gift of time to continue to put out a wide net for funding for an entire 28,000 square foot library.

An online comment was submitted by Jenifer Johnson who requested her comment be read into the meeting record which Mayor Williams read. Her comment was regarding the lack of available spots for summer camps. She suggested instead of using grant money for one free week, to put the money toward additional spots all summer long, utilize 6 elementary sites and 2 middle school sites to run smaller camps in the multi-purpose room to accommodate capacity that the Recreation Center cannot hold, and soon when there is an open building (library) on the Freedom High School campus they can solve two problems, staff (high schoolers) and location.

An online comment was submitted by Juliana Williams who expressed she is unhappy with the City approval of apartment complexes. She urged the Council to stop allowing unchecked building and expressed that she and her neighbors want Oakley to remain a small town.

Claudia Correia submitted a written comment mentioning that the Senior Center is a place to meet and socialize and to deactivate it is criminal in her opinion.

Laura Collins submitted a written comment that seniors need livelihood too and their wisdom and experience can help the younger generation.

Eleanor Railey submitted a written comment that she is not an Oakley resident but has attended various functions at the Senior Center and finds the volunteers helpful and friendly. She mentioned she agrees they need a place to adequately continue all functions offered. She asked the Council to put their parents, grandmother, etc. in their place.

Donna Baker submitted a written comment to apologize on behalf of the Oakley Senior Center for comments made by Mike Castro regarding Mr. McMurray.

Maria Reyes mailed a comment to the Council regarding the Senior Center, explaining the many services offered at the Senior Center and requesting the City Council consider providing a building that can accommodate all the services offered, rather than considering low-income housing. She mentioned it feels like the City is throwing the seniors out onto the streets and asked the Council to consider that one day they will be seniors too and would like a place to go to meet people, learn different things, eat lunch and play bingo. 14 3) COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS
Councilmember Meadows suggested scheduling with Mr. Mammon once a month to allow him more than three minutes to speak to update the Council on Delta matters.

Dr. Fuller commented that he thinks they need to recognize the trades in terms of what has been going on with construction. He mentioned that California Attorney General Bonta recently gave $3 million to Bay Area district attorneys to investigate wage theft/wage fraud throughout the Bay Area; Contra Costa County has received over $750k so it is a problem. He shared that on 1/1/1863, President Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation to free every slave in the Confederacy; it had to be carried throughout the Confederacy to be heard by Union soldiers. He mentioned on April 9, 1865, the Civil War ended and on June 19, 1865, Union soldiers arrived in Galveston, Texas to provide word of the Proclamation and the end of the Civil War. He shared that he had the privilege to work with Dr. Bernie Roy in the Watts area for the first magnet school because if you were a BIPOC person you had to ride the bus to go to school in the San Fernando Valley, and he brought it in. He mentioned in working there, he got to know about Juneteenth and the Black National Anthem written by James Weldon Johnson in 1900 to celebrate liberty. He commented that when he arrived in the City of Oakley, the City was not very friendly in terms of BIPOC, so he pushed for a Juneteenth celebration, and thanks to his colleagues, it has been approved. He announced that on June 15 in the Civic Center, the City of Oakley will have a Juneteenth celebration and he is happy to bring cultures together. He also commented that seniors are a demographic minority and he understands that seniors need their own senior center.
4) CONSENT CALENDAR

4.1 Approve Minutes from the Regular Joint City Council/City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency and Special Public Financing Authority Meeting held May 28, 2024 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)

4.2 Approve Minutes from the Special Joint City Council and Planning Commission Meeting held May 21, 2024 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)

4.3 Report Out of Closed Session Memo (Derek Cole, City Attorney)

4.4 Adopt a Resolution recognizing the 150-Year Anniversary of the Town of Byron, California (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)

4.5 Waive the Second Reading and adopt Ordinance No. 8-24 Adding Oakley Municipal Code Section 9.1.1230(d) to Address Outdoor and Indoor Marijuana Cultivation Exceeding Six Plants as Separate Offense (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)

4.6 Waive the Second Reading and adopt Ordinance No. 9-24 Adding Oakley Municipal Code Section 4.41.120 to Include an Administrative Hearing Process Related to Unlicensed Commercial Cannabis Activity (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)

4.7 Adopt a Resolution Ordering Specifications of the Election Order Regarding the November 5, 2024 City of Oakley General Municipal Election for Districts 1, 3 and 5 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)
15 4.8 Adopt a Resolution Designating Election Officials for the November 5, 2024 General Municipal Election (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)

4.9 Adopt a Resolution accepting the work associated with Capital Improvement Project Number (CIP) 205-Downtown Gateway Plaza and Infrastructure Improvement Project (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)

4.10 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement for Landscape Architectural Services with Dutchover & Associates to provide contract landscape and irrigation plan review and inspection services for the City of Oakley related to projects for Fiscal Years (FY) 2024/25 and 2025/26 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)

4.11 Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Work Associated with Capital Improvement Project Number (CIP) 255 -Cypress Grove Subdivision Pump Station Building Project (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)

4.12 Adopt a Resolution Approving a list of projects for Fiscal Year 2024/25 Funded by Senate Bill 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)

4.13 Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Contract to DC Electric Group, Inc. for Traffic Signal, Street Light Maintenance and Repair and USA Ticket Marking Services for Fiscal Years (FY) 2024/25 and 2025/26 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)

4.14 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with AireSpring for City Telephone and Internet Services for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024/2025 through 2027/2028 (Danielle Navarro, Assistant City Manager)

4.15 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Amendment for the Irrigation Well Installation at the City’s Freedom Basin Project--Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Number 265 to cover the cost for the PG&E Electric Service Application and Amendment No. 1 to the contract with Martell Water Systems, Inc. for additional costs for the well construction (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)

4.16 (Continued from May 14, 2024) Adopt a Resolution Accepting a Grant Deed Conveying to the City of Oakley Certain Real Property Interests (portions of APN 034-090-022, located at Laurel Road and O’Hara Avenue) (Derek Cole, City Attorney)

4.17 Request Approval of a Proclamation for a Future Agenda (Wound Care Awareness Month) (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)
Mayor Williams announced that items 4.1, 4.4 and 4.16 would be pulled.

Dr. Fuller requested items 4.9 and 4.13 be pulled.

It was moved by Councilmember Henderson and seconded by Dr. Fuller to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 16 Item 4.1
City Clerk Libby Vreonis noted revisions to the minutes within items 7.2 and 8.1.

It was moved by Dr. Fuller and seconded by Vice Mayor Shaw to approve the minutes as corrected. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)
Item 4.4
Mayor Anissa Williams called upon Linda Thuman, Chair of the Byron Municipal Authority, who thanked the City for recognizing the Town of Byron.

Claire Alaura, District Representative for County Board Supervisor Burgis’ Office, submitted a comment card, in support of recognition of the Town of Byron.

It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Councilmember Henderson to adopt the resolution. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) Item 4.9
Dr. Fuller commented that when he drives westbound on Main Street from Rose Avenue, he does not see a disabled parking space until he arrives in front of Grocery Outlet. He mentioned there used to be disabled parking but now there is two-hour parking in front of the Bistro, all diagonal parking, but no parking for someone in a wheelchair if they want to go to the Bistro because the nearest place he can find is the dental office or Guanatos where there are two disabled spaces in the parking lot. He mentioned Mr. Rohani is asking for approval and they will address it further with the budget; they have been told that projects include ADA, not just what is allocated for ADA within the budget, yet this project reduces the number of places to park on Main Street for handicapped people. He shared that he had to park at Guanatos to go to Chrome and he was able to walk but to consider a person that may be in a wheelchair to have to roll in the heat for that distance. He inquired why there were promises to add more ADA and now there is less.

Public Works Director/City Engineer Kevin Rohani commented that he does not recall the specifics of the promises Dr. Fuller mentioned, but this project is not on Main Street; this is the backside of Main Street from Second Street to Newman Way. He explained that it is a brandnew roadway, there is an abundance of ADA accessible parking for vehicles and vans in the parking lot that will service customers of all the businesses along Main Street, it exceeds the building requirements for ADA accessibility, it included ten EV charging stations with some for ADA accessibility in the back of the building, and he would be happy to provide a tour at his convenience. He mentioned the ADA along Main Street Dr. Fuller is referring to is a separate project, constructed in 2017, and generally they do not place ADA parking spaces along the streets; they are in the parking lots.

Dr. Fuller commented that there is no way to access that parking lot and it requires people who need ADA access to go through the back door, something that is never pleasant to contemplate.

He mentioned he can’t approve it; the vicinity map shows Main Street and the parking lot. He mentioned when it is open and accessible, they can look at it again, but there was handicapped parking taken from the front of the Bistro and replaced with two-hour parking and now there is no handicapped parking in front and you can’t access it from the rear due to the chain link fence and barricades, unless maybe someone can drive to Guanatos and drive all the way back. He mentioned right now, he doesn’t see access from Main Street so he will not vote to approve it, 17 but would look at it again when there is accessibility and people can park and with dignity, get out of their vehicles and go into the restaurant.

Mr. Rohani mentioned that the construction fences will come out after the finishing touches are completed for Summerfest. He mentioned the parking lot can be accessed through Journey Way, next to the Bistro, opposite Second Street, and on O’Hara Avenue all the barricades will come out and the parking lot will open, and also through Newman Way, so there is full accessibility throughout the campus that will open in a couple of weeks. He mentioned regarding the ADA parking spaces along Main Street, that Downtown Oakley didn’t look this way eight years ago; there was no curb, gutter or sidewalk, and while businesses may have painted handicapped parking, it may not have been up to code, and as part of the City’s projects, everything must meet the latest ADA and Building codes which staff has done.

Mayor Williams inquired where the closest ADA parking space is located for someone going to the Bistro.

Mr. Rohani mentioned the closest space is in the parking lot west of O'Hara Avenue; it has sidewalks that someone can easily use to go to the Bistro as well as handicapped ramps, with all street intersections visibly marked. He offered to take anyone on a tour and mentioned it is fully accessible, it has not opened yet because they are getting it ready for Summerfest.

Mayor Williams inquired if a vehicle can drive through to access everything once inside the parking lot.

Mr. Rohani mentioned east of the Bistro, Journey Way runs parallel to the railway right-of-way and connects to Norcross, the intersection at O’Hara will open and barricades will be removed, all of the parking lots are looped together, and will be fully accessible, including ADA parking spots for EV chargers.

Dr. Fuller inquired if there is a street sign or any sign at the entrance to the parking lot from Main Street indicating there is handicapped parking, besides having to drive it, which he does not prefer to do because the driveways are narrow. He commented that now handicapped persons have to drive further than anyone else going to the Bistro to access a marked parking space. He inquired if there are any signs on Main Street that indicate there is handicapped parking and once in the parking lot, if there are any signs showing which way to go to find handicapped parking.

Mr. Rohani mentioned these are referred to as wayfinding signs and currently they do not exist; it is taken that once everyone gets into circulation with the parking lots, everyone finds their way. He mentioned they can add a sign for anyone driving on Main Street to find parking in the back.

Dr. Fuller asked him to try and imagine if the only way you can go any place is through a wheelchair, and to do that, you have to hook the wheelchair to the back of your van, drive it down, pull down the wheelchair, get in it, and wheel yourself to the Bistro and back, so for anyone disabled, it is just not a matter of “go on your way”.

Mr. Rohani mentioned he understands. He commented that the parking lot even has van ADA parking spaces.

Mayor Williams commented that she assumes that municipalities must meet the highest standards and requirements for ADA, including how close spaces must be to entrances and exits, to make it the most user-friendly and accessible. She mentioned she realizes there are 18 some old ADA issues that they must get caught up on that seem different from this item. She inquired if audits are conducted on each project to show that they are meeting the highest standards of ADA accessibility because she assumes they would be subject to a lawsuit otherwise.

Mr. Rohani responded that all the new buildings in the Downtown must meet the CA Building Code and ADA code as part of the permit process, including how many parking spaces to include, and how many ADA parking spaces to include; these are designed as part of the project before construction begins, and get approved throughout the course of the project, get inspected, and at the end of the project when the building owner returns to get their occupancy permit, gets inspected again, including the ADA accessibility, to the most recent state codes.

Mayor Williams inquired if a building permit must be issued, and inspection performed, for a parking lot like that, which Mr. Rohani confirmed is correct.

Dr. Fuller commented that is called compliance in disability culture; you’re not really welcome, but if it must be built, build it as cheaply as possible. He mentioned the City has been audited and are $100 million in arrear with ADA services which they are aware of and which staff says they will take care of in construction, and staff is now asking him to approve construction that after all is said, you cannot just pull into a handicapped parking space on the street without a lot of trouble. He added while this may be compliant, he doesn’t think it is compliant, and therefore will vote ‘no’.

It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Vice Mayor Shaw to adopt the resolution. AYES: Henderson, Meadows, Shaw, Williams. NOES: Fuller. (4-1) Item 4.13
Dr. Fuller mentioned he wishes to address the same thing with this item. He mentioned from what he can tell from the budget, the City wants to keep expenses down and there is a traffic signal division to handle maintenance. He expressed he is unhappy that the City is contracting out a large number of services and would much rather see a ‘meet and confer’ with workers to see if they can handle this work, if they can be trained, if they would be willing to be trained, and what the compensation would be. He suggested if nothing else, they could hire retired people to come in and work at the regular rate.

Mr. Rohani mentioned they try to provide the best service to the community including in-house and contracted work depending on the project. He explained that traffic signal maintenance is highly specialized work and not something they can send staff to a junior college for a few months to become a signal technician; it takes about 4 years of education and 8,000 hours of actual training to become a certified traffic signal electrician and technician in California. He mentioned that cities much larger than Oakley contract services because it is impractical to have these in-house resources. He added that staff wants to be smart about how they deploy their resources and funding for their services. He further explained that traffic signals are a critical part of their infrastructure and there are liability issues if they malfunction; he wants to ensure the safety of residents. He mentioned there are currently over 40 signals with 4 more to be added in the near future. He added that even if they had trained people, they don’t have space for physical operations of a separate division, e.g., a bucket truck alone is over $200k, a warehouse would be needed to store parts, and the required specialized parts cannot just be obtained through local hardware stores. He mentioned all traffic signals in Oakley are serviced by contractor monthly, quarterly and annually on different maintenance schedules to ensure they are functioning as they should.
19 Mayor Williams inquired if there is an indemnity agreement for contracted services.

Mr. Rohani responded that they do not have a maintenance division specialized for traffic; the work is contracted, all contracts have indemnity clauses, and contracted work is documented with reports provided. He mentioned when accidents happen at intersections and lawsuits follow, parties want to see the records when the signal was last maintained; there is a lot that goes into maintenance and documentation to ensure the City is protected.

Mayor Williams inquired if retired people, as suggested, could take this on. She mentioned she assumed they would have to maintain a license and have a warehouse.

Mr. Rohani mentioned the issue is not retired or non-retired persons; it takes several years of school and over 8,000 hours in the field to become certified so when there is a service call, the person can respond to the maintenance box that holds electronics and knows how each controller box works, much like a computer; it is specialized work.

Mayor Williams mentioned it does not look like this went out to RFP. She inquired if staff went out to companies they know, but potentially, if there was a member in the community that specializes in this type of work, if they could have bid on this job.

Mr. Rohani explained an RFP was done 4-5 years ago when this firm was selected and prior to that other RFP’s were conducted for other projects. He mentioned that DC Electric has done excellent work for the City and staff would like to continue using their services.

It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Vice Mayor Shaw to adopt the resolution. AYES: Henderson, Meadows, Shaw, Williams. NOES: Fuller. (4-1) Item 4.16
City Clerk Libby Vreonis thanked the Councilmembers for their patience to consider the item as it had been continued several times. She mentioned corrective deeds were required of the sellers to ultimately prepare the grant deed of the property to the City which is now available.

It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Vice Mayor Shaw to adopt the resolution. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)
5) PUBLIC HEARINGS

5.1 Live Oak Industrial Park (TM 09-23, DR 07-23) Request for approval of a Tentative Map (TM 09-23) for condominium purposes and Design Review (DR 07-23) for the construction of eight warehouses. APN -037-100-065. (Ken Strelo, Community Development Director)
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Determination: Find the project is categorically exempt under the Infill Exemption (14 Cal. Code Regs./CEQA Guideline § 15332)
Mayor Williams announced the item.

Councilmember Henderson recused himself and left the room. 20 Community Development Director Ken Strelo presented the staff report and provided a PowerPoint presentation.

Councilmember Meadows inquired if a semitruck can get around the driveway.

Mr. Strelo confirmed it can and that all plans go through truck turning radius analysis.

Mayor Williams inquired if there could potentially be 16 separate uses in this plan. She also inquired if there is an option to not subdivide, such as the end two suites.

Mr. Strelo confirmed there could potentially be 16 separate uses in the building and as it is proposed when the final map is submitted, it would include those suites as needed; the applicant may wish to answer, but if before the final map is submitted and a user wanted to talk about the entire building or purchase those two suites, they could.

Mayor Williams inquired if the City’s consultants for economic development had identified this site as one of the sights to keep as light industrial.

Mr. Strelo responded that he does not have that answer off the top of his head.

Mayor Williams opened the public hearing.

Public Comment
Rich Ladeira commented that he owns the facility south of this project and he is 100% for it. He inquired if it is possible to delete the word “condominium”. He mentioned he sees no need for it; it scares him if some of these spaces are for sale that someone may purchase it and change it to something like an ADU.

Paul Seger commented that the staff report refers to this project as fitting into the infill exemption to CEQA. He pointed out that the project is smack dab in the middle of a California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, SB 535 disadvantaged communities census tract. He mentioned this is the only one in the City of Oakley, census tract 601330205.

He mentioned SB 535 stems from California Proposition 65 which requires businesses to provide warnings to Californians about significant exposures to chemicals that cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm; many of these items would fit into the light industrial nature of the zoning. He mentioned these chemicals can be products that Californians have purchased and have in their homes or work places, or that are released into the environment.

He mentioned by requiring that this information be provided Prop 65 enables Californians to make informed decisions about their exposures to these chemicals. He shared that SB 535 reports that this project census tract is an officially designated disadvantaged community and requires this project to address how the project will improve the health and quality of life for the community. He mentioned that more than 7,000 people live in this census tract and the percent of people living below twice the poverty level in this census tract is higher than 69% of the census tracts in California, cardiovascular disease in this census tract is 85.97% higher than the census tracts in California, and asthma rates in this census tract are 84% higher than census tracts in California. He mentioned the added environmental justice component to the General Plan, he hopes the City takes it seriously, and the Sierra Club will be looking at it and tracking it.

Mayor Williams closed the public hearing.

Councilmember Meadows commented that he likes the project, they worked on it on OMAC 30+ years ago and are finally seeing it come into existence, and it is needed in Oakley. To address 21 the comment made about use of the word “condominium”, he mentioned if there is concern that people will be living there, you’re not going to get that. He mentioned it is a great project and he supports it.

Vice Mayor Shaw agreed. She mentioned this is a different type of product than what the City currently has and there was some potential housing that was looked at for this location and was turned down, and by doing so, it provide this opportunity to do something different. She mentioned it brings to the community jobs and a different product that they do not have currently in the community, so she supports it. She commented that she can see how the word “condominiums” could be scary in terms of housing, but here because they are split buildings, it is the term that is used in real estate, but that doesn't mean people can live there.

Councilmember Meadows commented that it not only brings jobs but also small spaces for our local businesses to work out of which we don’t have, and this offers.

Mayor Williams commented that based on the comment received regarding CEQA, she assumes that to use the infill exemption to CEQA that all potential uses of light industrial were considered. She inquired what the stance on that is with there being no current tenants.

Mr. Strelo explained that when staff does a CEQA analysis to determine whether it requires an initial study or meets any of the CEQA exemptions, they look at the proposal, the application being submitted, and the project being proposed at that time; staff is examining any of the categorical exemptions that may apply and any statutory exemptions and if none apply, the project moves on to an initial study phase which is when negative declarations, mitigated negative declarations, or environmental impact reports may apply. He mentioned that with this type of project for light industrial, there are permitted by right uses, uses that are not expected to emit noise, dust, smoke etc., and then there are conditionally permitted uses, uses that may be listed with a catch all provision that sets forth that these types of uses may emit these types of things. He mentioned that conditional use permits are another type of discretionary approval; they go through their own type of analysis. He added that when a shell building comes in, staff is not looking at the worst-case scenario of what use may occupy it in the future; they are looking at the proposal in front of them.

Mayor Williams inquired if any of these concerns were brought forth to the Planning Commission.

Mr. Strelo responded that tonight is the first that he has heard of these concerns.

It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Vice Mayor Shaw to adopt the resolution as conditioned. AYES: Fuller, Meadows, Shaw, Williams. ABSTENTIONS:

Henderson. (4-0-1)
Councilmember Henderson returned to the room.

5.2 Adopt the Resolution Confirming the Diagrams and Assessments and Ordering the Levy and Collection of the Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2024/25 for the City of Oakley Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)
Public Works Director/City Engineer Kevin Rohani presented the staff report.

Mayor Williams called for questions and there being none, she opened the public hearing. 22 Mayor Williams inquired if there were any property owners that wanted to turn in a written protest regarding the levy of Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1 Assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25. There being none, she asked the City Clerk to report if there is a majority protest regarding the levy of street lighting and landscape assessment district No. 1 assessments for fiscal year 2024-25.

City Clerk Libby Vreonis confirmed there were no written protests submitted, declared there is no majority protest, and indicated proceedings may continue.

It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Councilmember Henderson to adopt the resolution. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 6) REGULAR CALENDAR

6.1 Consideration of Resolutions Adopting the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Proposed Operating Budget, Statement of Financial Policies, Appropriations Limit, Adopting the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Capital Budget and Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2024/25 through 2028/29 and Making Findings Related Thereto, and Approving Additional Sworn Police Positions on a Temporary Basis and the Master Salary Schedule. (Jeri Tejeda, Administrative Services Director)
Administrative Services Director Jeri Tejeda presented the staff report and a PowerPoint presentation. A handout was provided with corrections to pages 247 and 257 of the budget.

Councilmember Meadows commented that he likes what staff put together, it is clearer than what he has seen in past, and he likes over hiring two officers.

Dr. Fuller commented that the presentation on the budget was exemplary and easy to follow for expenditures and allocations. He mentioned he would like to address each resolution separately. He mentioned the operating budget, financial policies, and appropriations budget look good. He commented that there was nothing in the Creekside 115 expenditure fund. He mentioned that he was bewildered by the City Clerk section of the General Outlay, pages 102- 105, as there is no metric included for Public Records Act requests (PRAs) which would seem to be a large part of the City Clerk’s responsibilities and he is hopeful that someday the State will reimburse for the requirement, but if there is no data on it, he is not sure how to assess it.

He commented that on Page 95, he is very happy to see an IT help person that can be called, and the Council can receive assistance. He requested clarification regarding the 2% and 3% increases.

Ms. Tejeda responded that 3% is for the POA and 2% is for all other general non-sworn staff.

She mentioned these were adopted in 2022 for a five-year term, with a 9% increase for both units; one unit chose to go two years without and three years with 3% and the other chose to go 1 year without with 3% in the first year, and 2% in each additional year, so overall, everyone received 9%.

Dr. Fuller inquired why PRAs are not being assessed for the City Clerk’s Office as they seem like a lot of work.

Ms. Tejeda mentioned performance measures are newer, having been added to the budget a couple of budget cycles ago, and staff is still figuring out what to include and provide those numbers so they can take note and figure something out. 23 City Clerk Libby Vreonis agreed with Ms. Tejeda and added that on average, the City processes about 100 PRAs each year; however, this past year, the City switched to an online records request system and has seen a substantial increase in the number of requests. She explained at this time, staff is still examining the increase because before the electronic system, departments were handling some of those requests directly, whereas now most requests are being funneled through the system, so staff is tying to get a more accurate read on the numbers, and she anticipates that information will be included in future years.

Dr. Fuller commented that he would like to see it included in the matrix in the future. He mentioned in 2023, there was a report that addressed three significant budget deficiencies, including a deficiency regarding monthly investment reports. He inquired if the deficiencies have been resolved.

Ms. Tejeda mentioned the significant deficiencies that Dr. Fuller is referring to are from the annual audit, not from the budget document, and staff has worked very hard this year to resolve those. She mentioned one deficiency was the fee schedule and that has been corrected, and staff is aware of it to apply correct charges. She asked Dr. Fuller to restate which deficiency he brought up earlier.

Dr. Fuller commented that he mentioned earlier the investment reports but specifically related to budget, the report indicated the City should get away from incremental budgets but it is still being done. He inquired if they will be moving away from looking at a prior budget and trying to envision something new or if they will continue with incremental budget and trying to figure out how much it will increase.

Ms. Tejeda explained that she does not necessarily think that they follow an incremental budget in the sense of increasing the budget by a certain percentage each time. She mentioned every department spends time reviewing their budget by line item and determines what is needed and necessary, and the amount of increase may vary for each department based on needs.

Dr. Fuller inquired if the City Clerk’s Office wanted to invest in AI to prepare the minutes, for example (he is not advocating for it), and it will take a substantial initial investment, if it would be considered for an outlay to increase that amount beyond a COLA.

Ms. Tejeda explained that anything that would be a large add to the budget, currently over $50k, would require a form to be completed by the department listing the need and all the reasons why it is needed, and all departments’ requests are submitted at the same time for review by her and the City Manager and are discussed with the department directors to review what the budget can hold, and then they determine what provides the biggest benefit to the citizens of Oakley. She mentioned they are submitted annually on a form, so they are not just buried in a line item on the budget somewhere.

Mayor Williams inquired if ARPA funds could be considered if there is something moving around in the budget for some of the things they have received public comments for such as additional staffing for summer camp. She mentioned she referred the commenter to the schools as well.

She mentioned they have heard from the seniors as well. She inquired if some of the money does not come through, if they could decide as a Council, where they might be able to reallocate ARPA funds. She referred to page 152.

Ms. Tejeda mentioned ARPA reallocations were done mid-year. She suggested they bring it back again mid-year and discuss where funding is and any reallocations at that time. She mentioned page 152 provides where ARPA funding has been allocated but it doesn’t show how 24 much has been spent. She added that much of it is being spent, the largest portion, $3 million, going toward the library. She mentioned the only other funding that has some potential wiggle room is the amount allocated to technology enhancements. She shared as staff completes upcoming phases of the new EERP system in the next weeks, they will have a better understanding of their needs and what funding would be additional.

Mayor Williams mentioned people ask all the time why they can’t just shift money and she wanted to be able to identify any buckets of money that may be flexible should the majority of the Council decide something is important to pursue and ARPA funds seem to her the easiest place to get it from, but it sounds like it is down to the penny to pay for some of these things.

She added that she just wanted to have some thought as to reallocation if it is possible.

Ms. Tejeda mentioned pages 247 and 257 had errors that have been corrected and added to the budget.

Resolution #1: Approve a Resolution to Adopt the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Proposed Operating Budget, Statement of Financial Policies and Appropriations Limit It was moved by Dr. Fuller and seconded by Councilmember Meadows to adopt the Fiscal Year 2024/25 proposed Operating Budget, Statement of Financial Policies and Appropriations Limit.

Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)
Resolution #2: Approve a Resolution to Adopt a Fiscal Year 2024/25 Recommended Capital Budget and Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2024/25 through 2028/29.

Dr. Fuller inquired why we submit bids in the manner that we do with the CIP budget; how it gets to the bid trays.

Public Works Director/City Engineer Kevin Rohani explained that when staff prepares a project it is advertised by publishing in the newspaper and provided to all plan rooms in the Bay Area (where contractors go to get information on which projects are being offered in cities); notification gets sent to all of them. He mentioned that CIP 280 is currently being advertised and that at the July 9 Council meeting, he will present an award of contract for the Council’s consideration. He mentioned bids will be opened June 27.

Dr. Fuller mentioned during the last meeting Mr. Rohani addressed contract specifications and he went through a list of certain items to meet the standard. He inquired why they can’t do that for labor and meet with labor. He mentioned they just received a public comment regarding wage theft and the California Attorney General is concerned about wage theft and labor violations. He inquired why they can’t come up with a project labor agreement before projects go out to bid to make sure we’re getting the specifications involved.

Mr. Rohani mentioned that is a policy decision for the Council and discussion would be needed to review the impact of that on the projects that go to bid. He explained that all projects are bid to state requirements, including prevailing wage, and staff runs a tight ship on the bid process, records, payment records, and certified payrolls. He shared that the Council may recall that the Downtown project was brought forth to the Council in the fall of 2022 for award and Dr. Fuller had concern about his perspective and as a result, the Council requested staff bring a peer reviewer to peer review all the payrolls that staff reviews so they hired a consultant to perform that peer review for all certified payrolls and he is pleased to report that was done with a clean bill of health without any irregularities. He mentioned he is not naïve to those things happening with construction contracts but anything under the City’s purview, he will make sure that is not going on.
25 Dr. Fuller commented he will take that answer as a ‘yes’ if we so want to. He mentioned that he thinks staff already knows his position on $50k for a $100 million ADA deficit. He added that an audit was needed, the audit was conducted and showed $100 million in arrears, and he bets if another audit was conducted, it would now show $150 million in arrears. He mentioned he understands that there will always be 4 votes and there is going to have to be another way to bring this city up to speed with ADA because the City is “just plain ignoring us and he gets it.

He mentioned he doesn’t see anything for art and the community, and the seniors are correct; we need a library. He mentioned he hesitates with approving CIPs when they haven’t even looked at the County’s Las Dunes building. He commented that he will be voting ‘no’ and also would like to look into changing the policy for bids involving labor.

Mr. Rohani commented that aside from labor, Dr. Fuller was part of the process, including the Planning Commission, and the CIP program was fully discussed, and Dr. Fuller is well aware of the City’s resource structure; the City does not have unlimited funds and there are always competing interests. He mentioned if the Council wants E. Cypress Road to be done, something will have to give. He agreed that $50k is a drop in the bucket for a $150 million shortfall; they are doing what they can with the resources available while focusing on the highest priority projects that the Council had directed for the benefit of the community. He mentioned that the seniors may be another discussion, but the City has made substantial investments at the current Senior Center including a new roof, new HVAC, fixed the kitchen floor and doors, replaced the freezer, etc. so it is disingenuous to say the City does not do anything for the seniors when Public Works staff pretty much maintains the building. He mentioned that art would have to be a broader discussion by the Council and priorities if they wish to include art as part of CIPs, but right now staff has been focused on top projects of priority, E. Cypress Road (under construction) and Laurel Road (he will bring forth an award of contract July 9 for consideration).

It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Vice Mayor Shaw to adopt the resolution. AYES: Henderson, Meadows, Shaw, Williams. NOES: Fuller. (4-1) Resolution #3: Approve a Resolution to Adopt the Proposed Salary Schedule Effective July 7, 2024, Including the Approval of the Senior Planner Classification It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Councilmember Henderson to adopt the resolution. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) Resolution #4: Approve a Resolution Authorizing Two Additional Sworn Police Positions on a Temporary Basis
It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Vice Mayor Shaw to adopt the resolution. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)

6.2 Adopt a Resolution Approving the Third Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of Oakley and Joshua McMurray (Derek Cole, City Attorney) Assistant City Attorney Elizabeth Fratarcangeli presented the staff report, mentioning that this amendment provides a 5% increase in the City Manager’s annual base salary to $291,375 and increases his severance to a 9-month period with a right to earn 3 additional months, up to 12 months of severance, based on his time with the City. She mentioned that the total fiscal impact for a 5% pay increase is $17,808 annually, a 3% increase was assumed in the FY 24/25 budget document, so if this item is approved, staff would request a budget amendment to reconcile the 3% anticipated increase to the proposed 5% increase in the amount of $7,125 for FY 24/25 26 funded by the General Fund, and these are the only substantive changes to the City Manager’s employment contract.

It was moved by Councilmember Henderson and seconded by Councilmember Meadows to adopt the resolution. AYES: Henderson, Meadows, Shaw, Williams. NOES: Fuller. (4-1) Mayor Williams called for a 5-minute break at 8:39 p.m. The Council reconvened 8:47 p.m.

6.3 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to execute the Sixth Amendment to the Agreement with Cole Huber LLP for City Attorney Services (Joshua McMurray, City Manager)
City Manager Joshua McMurray presented the staff report. He mentioned approval of this item would allow for a 3-year term and the fiscal impact for general retainer services would be $192,000 in the first year, FY 24/25 (11% increase), $198,000 in the second year, FY 25/26 (3% increase) and $204,000 in the third year, FY 26/27 (3% increase).

Dr. Fuller requested clarification if the fiscal year impact for the first year will be an increase of $20k which Mr. McMurray confirmed is correct, approximately.

It was moved by Vice Mayor Shaw and seconded by Councilmember Henderson to adopt the resolution. AYES: Henderson, Meadows, Shaw, Williams. NOES: Fuller. (4-1)

6.4 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Joint Use Agreement and Side Agreement between the City of Oakley and the Oakley Union Elementary School District (Joshua McMurray, City Manager) City Manager Joshua McMurray presented the staff report.

Vice Mayor Shaw commented that besides E. Cypress Road, parks are probably the next biggest things she hears about from residents, especially regarding Vintage Park which is in her district. She added that Mr. McMurray mentioned in his report that it will be discussed during mid-year budget review, but she would like him to address the timeline as right now the park is unsafe and she understands that it would need to go out for bid, but she would like the public to have an idea when it may happen.

Mr. McMurray mentioned that demolition of certain playgrounds outlined in the agreement is the first step and the City has agreed to use its Public Works staff to do the demolition; it gives staff experience and is more cost effective for both the City and School District. He mentioned demolition will happen this summer/fall, staff will bring the mid-year budget to Council in February 2025, and with the Council’s approval, staff will add a project into the CIP to address the play structure at Vintage and the deficiencies at the O'Hara Park Middle School structure.

He added that if approved into the CIP, staff would have to look at design, bid the project, Council would consider award of the contract, and work would commence probably mid-2025.

Vice Mayor Shaw inquired if the $75,000 reimbursement would still work the same; they would have to provide the work and submit receipts to get reimbursed which Mr. McMurray confirmed is correct.

Dr. Fuller asked Mr. McMurray if he could go over again what he mentioned about raising prices and bids.
27 Mr. McMurray responded that the School District is making a one-time contribution to the City to address deficiencies with playgrounds; it is not enough to address community parks. He mentioned Vintage Parkway does not have a City park and the City needs to deliver a playground to that community that is appropriate to the number of residents that live there, similar to what the City did here at Civic Center Plaza. He added that staff’s plan is to add a CIP at mid-year to the FY 24/25 budget, staff will bring that to the Council in February 2025 for consideration, and if approved, staff would have to design, bid, award, and construct the project.

Dr. Fuller inquired if he was saying they can repair what is there now.

Mr. McMurray responded ‘no’ and explained that there is nothing that the City can use or re-use at the Vintage Parkway playground so it will be a scrape, as will be the Oakley Elementary playground. He mentioned that the O'Hara Park Middle School playground is still in good condition, there are pieces of the play structure that need replacement, a bench that needs to be replaced, and some other site furnishings that can be replaced.

Dr. Fuller inquired what is the discussion; if they go along with it, if Vintage Parkway will be all taken care of with a cheaper price and everybody over there will have a park, and that is it, or if they will still need to go through the CIP process.

Mr. McMurray explained that the CIP process still needs to ensue. He explained that this agreement gives the City a path forward from the current agreement and it outlines how the City gets to a new playground at Vintage Parkway, how they fix the playground at O’Hara, what happens in terms of maintenance obligations, and reimbursement from the City to the District for maintenance.

Dr. Fuller commented that it seems like irreconcilable differences; it has been a thorn in the City’s side for a long time and the City has spent a lot of time and effort to get compliance it never received. He mentioned that he is thankful for Lynelle Fuller (no relation to him) and Sherry Seat sitting down and for people here working out the agreement, but the bottom line is he would like to know why the City can’t buy the property from the School District if they would be willing to sell so the City can build a playground and not have to worry about Vintage Parkway anymore, whether the School District is going to or not going to comply, and whether a contract is going to or not going to work.

Mr. McMurray commented that he can’t answer those questions because they haven’t had those discussions with the School District. He mentioned it is possible, but he would not allude to the fact that it is something they could do or want to do; it is a discussion for the Council to provide direction if it wants to explore that. He explained that they looked at the agreement in place now as something the City can’t live with because unfortunately, the way it was structured is that it automatically renews. He explained further that if no action is taken now, the current term would automatically extend another 25 years with the City having to pay the School District $150k each year and right now there are several facilities that are deficient that the community relies on for use. He mentioned they worked collaboratively with the School District for well over a year to get to this agreement and it is a good agreement that places the burden of playgrounds with the City which it is good at and allows the School District to address their field issues specifically, so those two pieces of the puzzle are separated and specifically defined. He added that it reduces the City’s overall burden of the financial structure of the agreement, but it also places the burden of constructing projects, specifically the Vintage Parkway park site, on the City so there is give and take and he believes it is a mutually beneficial agreement to both parties. He mentioned they have never been at the point they are at now in agreement in principle to what is now on paper. He also mentioned that the School Board will consider it tomorrow night and he doesn’t expect any issues as the sub-committee consisting of Mayor 28 Williams and Councilmember Meadows as well as the School District’s two Board members have been engaged and there is buy-in from both sides.

Dr. Fuller inquired what happens if the City does not choose for the agreement to automatically renew, if it were to convey that they are done.

Mr. McMurray explained that the agreement is not something he would ever recommend entering as the term is 25 years and a lot can change during that time and it has as they have discussed; auto-renewal is unique as usually the parties want to meet and confirm that the agreement is working for both. He mentioned they are recommending a 5-year term upfront, with a 2-year automatic extension; if they do nothing, the current agreement will automatically extend and the City is on the hook so they have to do something in his opinion.

Dr. Fuller commented that there is nobody here that he can sit and talk about, so he won’t.

Councilmember Henderson mentioned he believes his question was answered but inquired if the agreement is agendized for the School Board meeting tomorrow night, which Mr. McMurray confirmed is correct.

Vice Mayor Shaw mentioned Mr. McMurray answered one of her questions as well in that it is not just playgrounds, but playgrounds and hardscapes and the bench was what she wanted to bring up. She inquired if anything that is not turf, not just the play structure, would be the City’s responsibility, which Mr. McMurray confirmed is correct.

Vice Mayor Shaw shared that she had someone inquire about the City purchasing the property as Dr. Fuller has mentioned, and she believes that this is an alternative to buying the property that will give residents now City maintained play structures in areas where residents don’t currently have play structures in those areas. She mentioned to buy it and build play structures would be way more than this agreement. She also mentioned that the residents in Vintage Parkway use the park a lot. She expressed that she is in favor of it.

Mayor Williams commented that the timeline Mr. McMurray mentioned would provide completion around mid-2025 and that would be fine for something completely gated off or demolished, but she receives emails all the time regarding the bench at O’Hara Park ripping clothing and would like to know if there is a way to update or remove the bench before February 2025.

Mr. McMurray responded that staff can revisit critical pieces of infrastructure that may need to be replaced much sooner.

Mayor Williams mentioned once the City maintains the equipment with this agreement, residents could use the City’s app to report any issues as with other parks the City currently maintains so they can assume it would have a much quicker response time.

Mr. McMurray confirmed that is correct; residents can report an issue through the Oakley OnDemand app, it goes to staff immediately, and staff would address it.

Mayor Williams commented that she is very excited about this and very happy with people that came to the table. She expressed gratitude for their effort and for people who want to make it right for residents.

Councilmember Meadows agreed they had positive conversations with the representatives from the School District Board.
29 Mayor Williams called for public comment; there were none.

It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Councilmember Henderson to adopt the resolution. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)

6.5 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement between the City of Oakley and the Oakley Union Elementary School District for School Resource Officer Services (Joshua McMurray, City Manager) Mr. McMurray presented staff report. He mentioned after the draft agreement had been prepared and the agenda was published, he had an additional conversation with the School District Superintendent and he requested a revision to the organization term of the agreement.

In addition to the last sentence which they worded together, the following language is proposed:
"To ensure collaboration, OUESD may request a personnel change in the SRO from the City of Oakley. That change may or may not be accommodated depending on staffing levels at the Police Department." He explained that if they do not feel the SRO is a good fit, they can have a mutual discussion and if the City is able to make that change, it will, otherwise, there is language to protect the City.

Vice Mayor Shaw commented that Mr. McMurray mentioned this agreement is modeled after the high school SRO agreement. She inquired if staff is happy with that agreement and when that agreements will be renewed.

Mr. McMurray commented that in his opinion, it has been a good agreement. He asked Chief of Police Paul Beard to comment. Mr. McMurray mentioned the high school agreement is out of term and he has been actively discussing it with LUHSD Superintendent Eric Volta who is leaving soon to a new position, but he will continue to work with LUHSD to get it up to date for a new cost share and new term.

Vice Mayor Shaw commented she was just curious if it is similar.

Mr. McMurray commented that he has had previous discussions with the Superintendent and he wouldn’t expect the District to have any issue with what has been discussed.

Chief Beard mentioned that during his tenure in Oakley, even prior to being Chief, he has seen how the SRO is modeled and the high school has changed over the past few years. He mentioned the SRO used to be treated a juvenile detective and the SRO would be pulled to work at the Police Department to investigate cases. He explained that responsibility has been taken away from the SRO to allow the SRO to be at the school 100% of the time. He mentioned that has been good modeling and the high school is happy with that arrangement. He added that the proposed SRO would follow the same modeling and would be at the schools 100% of the time, ideally 50% at each school. He mentioned that the SRO will need to make decisions which campus needs more of his or her time. He concluded by mentioning that he believes it is a good model that they have in place right now.

Mayor Williams inquired how many middle schools do this around the area.

Chief Beard mentioned that Pittsburg and Brentwood have them at the middle schools.

Mayor Williams inquired if they have a split or dedicated SRO in Brentwood for the three middle schools.

Chief Beard mentioned he is not certain but knows that they have more than one SRO. 30 Mayor Williams inquired if both schools equally need an SRO, if they could add an SRO under this agreement or if it would be a new agreement.

Mr. McMurray mentioned this agreement could be amended.

Councilmember Henderson inquired if this item is on the School Board agenda tomorrow night which Mr. McMurray confirmed it is.

Councilmember Henderson commented that the City is out in front of them on both.

Mr. McMurray confirmed that is correct; it is the way their meeting dates lined up.

Dr. Fuller commented that he likes the agreement. He mentioned on the second page under purpose, he wonders why it comes out so strong when the agreement speaks to collaboration all the way through. He mentioned there will be a decision made regarding the atmosphere that it will create but it doesn’t mention anything about collaboration. He suggested the first part of the sentence begin with “In collaboration with OUESD and OPD, an atmosphere will be created…” He mentioned he likes the idea of collaboration. He shared that he just happened to go through an American Educational Research Association webinar not about this, but they mentioned SROs, and he doesn’t know what their measurements are or how they address the study, but there are a few studies out that say the SROs are not working as they are supposed to work and there are some difficulties. He mentioned he would like to see the City’s work; it has a lot to offer. He commented that he sees it as the School District’s responsibility to address ongoing behavior and discipline problems, and the SRO can work with them, but it is not the City’s responsibility; it is the School District’s responsibility. He mentioned if the School District believes it is a crime, they can contact the SRO and the SRO can make a decision, and the City and School District will work collaboratively, but OUESD has the credential for an educational atmosphere and should not rely on the City to address discipline.

Chief Beard responded that regardless of the wording of the agreement, it has been a very collaborative effort thus far to ensure this agreement is just right to ensure there is a collaborative relationship between both parties. He shared the ultimate desire is for the middle schools to receive law enforcement services at both campuses. He mentioned the SRO is not assigned to be the disciplinarian for the school; the SRO is to prevent crime and provide a law enforcement service.

Dr. Fuller mentioned he would be glad to move it with that in there.

Mr. McMurray commented that if any amendments are proposed, they have not been discussed with School District, so he would need to provide those to them. He added in the event they are substantive, and the School District doesn’t agree with those amendments, staff would need to come back with the agreement.

Dr. Fuller mentioned he doesn’t see why they would disagree, but he would like to propose to include that OUESD and OPD will work collaboratively to create that atmosphere in the section of the agreement that addresses “Purpose.”
Mr. McMurray inquired if Dr. Fuller is requesting to add it to the beginning of that paragraph.

Dr. Fuller confirmed that is correct; he would like the paragraph to begin by including that, “Working collaboratively, both agencies agree to…” He moved to approve the item with that amendment.
31 Mayor Williams inquired what would be the process as this is going before the School Board tomorrow.

Mr. McMurray explained that if the Council approves the item with this amendment, staff would provide the amended agreement to the Superintendent to present to the School District Board and they would vote.

Councilmember Meadows requested clarification on the wording to be added at the beginning of the paragraph.

Dr. Fuller responded that he is proposing, “In collaboration with OUESD and OPD, the purpose is to create and encourage through every useful purpose…” Vice Mayor Shaw commented that she believes it addressed in the middle where it includes “students, parents, OUESD employees, and Police Officers, so it is even more inclusive than just OUESD and OPD, and she feels like it addresses that collaborative effort and even more parties in that collaboration.

Dr. Fuller mentioned communication is nice and encouraged, but decision-making involves a collaboration between the Chief of Police, the principals, and the School District.

Chief Beard commented that he doesn’t have the agreement in front of him, but it sounds like a minor change that he wishes to have included and that is what needs to be ironed out.

Mr. McMurray mentioned staff has notes on what Dr. Fuller just mentioned so if there is a motion, it is seconded, and there is a vote to approve, staff will present that to the School District, otherwise staff will present it to the School District ‘as is’.

Mayor Williams mentioned there was a first to include that amendment. She called for a second on the amendment. The motion died for lack of a second.

It was moved by Councilmember Henderson and seconded by Councilmember Meadows to adopt the resolution as written. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 7) REPORTS

7.1 CITY MANAGER
(a) City Manager
City Manager Joshua McMurray announced that the 2nd Annual Juneteenth Celebration will be held June 15 at Civic Center Plaza, 10am-1pm, and Summerfest will be held at Civic Center Plaza June 29, with a parade on Main Street, 9am-10am, and event, 11am-4pm. He mentioned with the heat and longer days, splash pads hours have been extended 10am-8pm until Labor Day and are open at Creekside and NunnWilson parks.
(b) Business License Update
Mr. McMurray mentioned the list for May is provided in the agenda packet. 32 (c) Report from the Oaks Apartments
Mr. McMurray mentioned that The Oaks Apartments representative is present from WinnResidential.

Vice Mayor Shaw inquired how residents that were displaced have been adjusting. She thanked them for providing the work order real page print out.

Katie with WinnResidential mentioned she is the regional manager and supervisor for the property (not on site).

Mayor Williams inquired if she is the same Katie as in “Coffee with Katie”.

Katie responded that is correct, residents are glad to be home, staff helped with cleaning out refrigerators due to the power outages, and residents received a stipend for food and rent reduction for the days they were out. She mentioned site staff did a great job coordinating the move; they had shuttles to ensure residents returned safely as quickly as they could. She mentioned a few people had to stay a few days longer because they need the elevator and it took a little longer to have repaired.

Vice Mayor Shaw shared that she was on site as residents were moving back and the community room was full of residents happy to be home. She mentioned that many of the seniors asked her questions about programming, the difference between Section 8 housing and tax credit housing, and many told her they don’t know how to apply for Section 8. She inquired if they provide that type of education through their social services or activity coordinator, and if not, can they bring someone in to provide that education so residents, especially seniors, know how to apply for services, including utilities; i.e., CARE program, or Section 8 where they can keep their apartment but where their rent would be determined on their income rather than market rate.

Katie mentioned they do provide utility and food assistance and have a lot of information that is provided from their office. Regarding Section 8 housing, she mentioned they usually direct residents to Section 8 for the County and any temporary rental assistance programs they are aware of.

Vice Mayor Shaw commented that is great, but they are waiting until there is a need; if management provides information upfront to residents of available options, then residents can come privately to staff to discuss.

Katie mentioned she wrote down the suggestion and will take it to their next meeting.

Dr. Fuller mentioned he previously inquired about the purpose of senior housing and management couldn’t provide an answer from what he could see. He mentioned in reading the letter from HUD, you can put seniors into one area as long as they know they are going into one area, but it is designed to facilitate elderly people is what is meant if he remembers correctly and what he is not hearing from management is why it is advantageous to be living in that apartment. He mentioned he is hearing from people living in that area that they are being maltreated, they are angry, they do not feel they are being addressed, the staff is discourteous, and management can’t answer what is the advantage to live in senior housing. He asked Katie what the advantage is and how is it being carried out for 55+ years old in the senior housing versus being inclusive throughout the complex.
33 Katie commented that the entire complex is open to all seniors and they can apply and would qualify for any of the buildings. She mentioned the benefit to the senior building is that it is more quiet and less disruptive without kids and guests, and it is more exclusive for them so they may relax in the community room without anyone underage intruding on their time and space; it is voluntary for them.

Dr. Fuller commented that he is hearing management and residents, and he would like to hear residents say it is so nice to be living there.

Katie mentioned when family housing was built on the same lot, a couple of the seniors were residents then and were upset that they had to now share space with family housing.

Dr. Fuller mentioned as Vice Mayor Shaw pointed out, that many seniors do not know what the advantage is for them. He provided an example such as having a doctor note for a CPAP machine could reduce an electric bill. He mentioned maybe they can include in programming an event such as a senior dance.

Katie commented that they had a sock hop last year.

Vice Mayor Shaw commented that the CPAP machine reduced utility bill is available to all, not just senior housing. She mentioned that some seniors indicated after the last meeting that they don’t want to live in the family housing buildings; those that choose to live in senior housing want to be with same age group with whom they share the same interests. She mentioned some have taken a unit in a family housing as a placeholder until a senior building apartment becomes available; where she works, it can take 3-4 years (62+ years old). She mentioned seniors want their own aging in place space where they can stay out on congregate living but still have some independence within a community of people their own age.

Dr. Fuller commend that is called inclusion.

Mayor Williams inquired when seniors apply if it meets the different buildings, i.e., Oak Forest Senior Villas, Oak Place Senior Villas, or Oak Grove Terrace.

Katie mentioned one of the first questions they ask applicants if they are over 55 years of age is if they prefer a senior or family building.

Mayor Williams inquired if management does not force residents into senior building just because they are over the age of 55.

Katie confirmed that is correct and mentioned that it takes 1.5 times rent to qualify for one of the senior buildings which is a benefit to them because of fixed income, and it 2.5 times rent to qualify for family housing, so it is a benefit to seniors to live in the senior building.

Mayor Williams commented on the real page report, the average days to complete, there are discrepancies in how quickly things are taken care of between buildings. She inquired if that is due to the complexity of the work orders because it seems like a long time.

Katie mentioned that she knows Oke Johnson with WinnResidential spoke about it during the last meeting, but it is different to see the chart. She explained that when residents put in work orders, they can be held in the system for various reasons, i.e., working with vendors, it may be lower priority than other work orders, or it could be a preventative maintenance situation that they put in the system, all of which tend to throw off the numbers for response time. She mentioned their maintenance director is working with the site right now to have the numbers be 34 more accurate; they are moving preventative maintenance items to a schedule, so it doesn’t throw off those numbers and they are checking older work orders to see why they were stalled and to make sure they are completed timely.

Mayor Williams commented that she has heard there is some frustration with how long work orders take so residents are saying they are not even putting in work orders, so she is telling them that if they want things fixed, there has to be a record that the problem exists. She mentioned she would appreciate refining the report to call out any health and safety situations, i.e., elevators and trash chutes, and for people to still place work orders for these. She mentioned people seem to like using the carts if they can provide an update on that and also the progress on posting the emergency evacuation plan and having drills.

Katie mentioned they are discussing the plan and getting it in place; they will include it in the next report.

Mayor Williams requested that they involve all agencies, i.e., fire, so they understand what the plan is.

Vice Mayor Shaw inquired with the continued completion of backlog on workorders and changing items to a preventative maintenance schedule, if Katie sees improvement in the number of days to complete.

Katie confirmed that is correct.

Vice Mayor Shaw mentioned she understands with a red tag emergency that work orders will be delayed. She inquired if management ever included the common areas, i.e., elevators, laundry rooms, in the app where residents can submit work orders. She mentioned that Oke Johnson discussed putting that in during the ad-hoc meetings and she think it might help people to feel comfortable to place work orders.

Katie mentioned their software is RealPage and Oke was working with them for a fix on that, but if it is a common area issue, residents can call site staff and staff can enter work orders into the system. She shared that the app is specific to units for work orders, payments, etc.; there is not an option to place work orders for common areas.

Vice Mayor Shaw inquired for residents who don’t like to use tech if they can call in work orders which Katie confirmed is correct.

7.2 OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR

AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a) Reports from Council Liaisons to Regional Committees, Commissions and Boards AND Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency
Mayor Meadows reported that he attended the CCTA Planning Committee meeting last Thursday.

Vice Mayor Shaw reported that she attended the Contra Costa Mayors Conference and the Freedom High School graduation ceremony.

Councilmember Henderson reported that he attended the Ironhouse Sanitary District Board meeting ISD on June 4 which involved mostly closed session as they try to fill the General 35 Manager position. He also reported attending Supervisor Burgis’ Bay Area Affordable Housing Bond discussion on June 5; it was a good discussion with about 7 people in the audience.

Mayor Williams reported that on June 5, she attended the Hijas Del Campo casita move-in; they worked with Carondelet High School to put tiny homes on a farm in Brentwood for farm workers and have future plans to do the same in Oakley. She also reported that she attended a BAFHA work session, where there was an explanation about BAHFA and the different things ABAG is trying to bring; there is additional literature for anyone interested. She also reported attending the Mayors Conference where the County Library provided a presentation on its locations, and they got to see more from the County’s perspective about the increase in usage and physical check outs, and they received information regarding plans and resources they have been working on as well as a self-service pilot program. She mentioned ABAG received the HCD report on the 7th RHNA cycle and they have asked for transparency on how the numbers are derived, and how vacant units and unhoused are calculated. She also mentioned that BART has extensive repairs coming up requiring bus bridges through 2025. She announced that Port Chicago Weekend is coming up with more information available on its website. She also announced that there will be workshops for people who wish to run for office in Lafayette on June 22, in Antioch on June 24, and in El Cerrito on June 26. She also reported attending the Meals on Wheels Gala and she got to see the impact they have out here. (b) Requests for Future Agendas
There were no requests for future agenda items.
8) WORK SESSIONS
None.
9) CLOSED SESSION
None.
10) ADJOURN
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:57 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted,
Libby Vreonis
City Clerk
36 MEMORANDUM
City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US Date: June 24, 2024
To: Mayor and City Councilmembers
From: Derek P. Cole, City Attorney
CC: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
Subject: Closed Session Report-Out Memo
For Consideration at the City Council Meeting of July 9, 2024 Background and Analysis
The City Council considered the following closed session item during its special meeting held June 11, 2024:

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Schaefers v. BNSF Railway Company et al. (and City of Oakley), Contra Costa Sup.

Ct. Case Nos. C22-01552 and C22-01555
Direction was provided to staff. There was no reportable action.

Fiscal Impact
None.

Recommendation
Receive and file this report.

Attachments
None.
37 STAFF REPORT

City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: July 9, 2024
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Accept the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023/24 Fourth Quarter Report on the Capital Improvement Program
Background and Analysis
This report summarizes the status of the various projects in the City of Oakley Capital Improvement Program (CIP) at the end of the Fourth Quarter for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023/24.

The City's CIP is a multi-year forecast of capital needs that includes new construction projects and planned improvements to existing facilities. The CIP establishes structure by identifying, prioritizing, approving, and the funding of capital improvement projects. Since the demand for capital projects typically exceeds the amount of available funds, projects are prioritized based on the City Council’s Strategic Goals.

The following highlights some of the projects and their progress in the Fourth Quarter of FY 2023/24 (April-June 2024):

1. Oakley Regional Community Park Project
Project # 176
Schedule: Project Master Planning is underway
Budget: $3,502,609
Funding Source: Community Park Fund, and Park Impact Fee This project transforms a 55-acre site at the end of Sellers Avenue that was given to the City as part of the development agreements with the Emerson, Gilbert, and Burroughs development projects. This site had several deteriorated structures related to a dairy farm that had been closed for decades. The first phase of this project was to demolish and remove the abandoned structures, which were a safety concern, and to clean up the site. This task was accomplished in the summer of 2019. In March of 2021, the City applied for a State Proposition 68 grant to fund the first phase of this project and did not qualify for the grant. The construction of the Oakley Regional Park will span several years as funding is secured through a combination of Grants and local funds. A new Master Planning study of this site was prepared and approved by the City Council in spring 2024. The study outlined the community and City Council preferences on the features that this park would have and will be used to pursue grant funding for the implementation of this park master plan.

Approved and
Forwarded to the
City Council
38 STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 2
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US

2. East Cypress Road Widening (Knightsen Avenue to Jersey Island Road) Project Project # 247
Schedule: Construction is underway
Budget: $11,180,000
Funding Source: Traffic Impact Fee Fund, Gas Tax, RMRA, Measure J The growth and development of new subdivision projects along the East Cypress Road corridor has necessitated various infrastructure improvements to accommodate the increased traffic volumes on this road. This project will widen and improve East Cypress Road from Knightsen Avenue to west of Jersey Island Road. The improvements will include curb, gutter, sidewalk and a median island. The construction of this project is underway, and it is anticipated to be completed by summer 2025.

3. Cypress Grove Subdivision Pump Station Building Project Project # 255
Schedule: Construction is completed
Budget: $1,732,944
Funding Source: CFD Fund
At the Cypress Grove Subdivision, the pump station, emergency generator, and its associated electrical components are housed in a building with only a half roof and are exposed to the environmental elements. The components degrade much quicker when exposed to the elements and require more frequent service and costly replacement. This project constructed a full roof and new walls on the existing building to enclose and protect the valuable mechanical components and promote their longevity. In addition, this project upgraded the electrical and mechanical parts of this pump station. The construction of this project has been successfully completed.

4. Irrigation Well Installation at City’s Freedom Basin Project Project # 265
Schedule: Construction is underway
Budget: $400,000
Funding Source: Public Facilities and Park Impact Fee Fund 39 STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 3
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US This project will install a new irrigation well adjacent to O’Hara Avenue next to the City owned storm drain basin, more commonly known as Freedom basin. This new well will provide the City with an independent, stable, and continuous source of water to irrigate the large field that is used by an assortment of leagues for sporting activities.

The existing well used to irrigate the field is owned and operated by the High School District, and due to its continuous breakdowns, this well is not a reliable source to provide the massive amount of irrigation water needed for this field. It is anticipated that the construction work will be completed by fall 2024.

5. Laurel Road Extension Project (Teton Road to Sellers Avenue) Project # 273
Schedule: Design is underway
Budget: $360,000
Funding Source: Traffic Impact Fee Fund
This Project will extend Laurel Road from Teton Road to Sellers Avenue, providing an alternate and much needed secondary route for the residents of far east Oakley along East Cypress Road. Currently, the only major access in and out of far east Oakley is via East Cypress Road. This current route along East Cypress Road passes by an elementary and middle school and crosses the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad tracks. Traffic volumes have increased over the years and continue to grow with the new housing developments in far east Oakley. Extending Laurel Road from Teton Road to Sellers Avenue will provide much-needed direct access to Highway 4 and job centers in the Bay Area and reduce traffic congestion from East Cypress Road.

This project will construct a new bridge across the BNSF railroad tracks and construct a new 4-lane roadway with curb, gutter, sidewalk, medians, and streetlights. In addition, a new traffic signal will be constructed at the intersection of Laurel Road and Sellers Avenue. The preliminary design of this project is completed. Staff will be working on the Right of Way acquisition process and securing funding for the construction of this project, which is estimated to be nearly $40M.

6. Laurel Road Widening Project (O'Hara Avenue to Cloverbrook Avenue) Project # 280
Schedule: Bidding is underway
Budget: $1,227,000
Funding Source: Traffic Impact Fee Fund, ARPA
Laurel Road from O'Hara Avenue to Cloverbrook Avenue is the last section of Laurel Road that needs to be widened and improved. Laurel Road is a major Arterial Road 40 STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 4
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US and the City's designated truck route with a direct connection to Highway 4. This section of Laurel Road has not been widened or improved due to the lack of Right of Way and is starting to deteriorate due to the large volume of vehicles that use Laurel Road every day. Staff worked for the past few years with the property owners at the intersection of Laurel Road and O’Hara Avenue and secured the necessary right of way for the roadway widening. The design of this project is currently underway and will require major utility relocation of the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) utility poles. WAPA has informed the City that they will be relocating their utility poles by July 2024 and the actual construction of all roadway widening and improvements is anticipated to start in summer 2024 and be completed by summer 2025.

7. Enrico Cinquini Park Construction Project
Project # 281
Schedule: Design is underway
Budget: $4,200,000
Funding Source: Park Impact Fee Fund
The developer of the Stonewood Subdivision, a collection of 262 lots, was conditioned to construct a new park (Enrico Cinquini Park) at the intersection of Rose Avenue and Carpenter Road. The obligation of the developer is the total amount of their Park Impact Fee ($2.1M), which would not be sufficient to construct this park and its associated facilities and features. As a result, the City will design and construct this park by utilizing the Park Impact Fee obligation of the developer, as well as supplementing it with additional City Park Impact fees. This beautiful and feature packed park for the community will include a new natural turf field, site grading, landscaping and irrigation, a half basketball court, a bocce ball court, a cornhole court, a splashpad water feature, a playground, restroom, and a covered picnic area. The design of the project is currently underway, and project bidding is anticipated to take place in fall 2024.

8. Pedestrian Crossing Lighting System Installation at O'Hara Avenue and Trail Crossing Project
Project # 294
Schedule: Construction is completed
Budget: $75,000
Funding Source: Street Maintenance & Rehab Fund and RMRA State Grant The City had been able to secure State grant funding to install new lighted crosswalk systems on O’Hara Avenue at the trail crossing. This project will improve the safety for 41 STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 5
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US pedestrians and bicyclists who ride on the trail as they cross O'Hara Avenue. The construction of this project has been successfully completed.

9. FY 2023/24 Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Reconstruction Project Project # 295
Schedule: Construction is completed
Budget: $100,000
Funding Source: RMRA Fund
This project repaired and replaced damaged concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk in the community as part of the 50-50 cost sharing program between the City and property owners. This project has been successfully implemented for the past few years and has continued into FY 2023/24. This project has helped to provide safe pedestrian facilities and reduce liability and claims for trip and fall accidents. The construction of this project has been successfully completed.

10. East Cypress Road Widening (Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road) Project Project # 302
Schedule: Design is underway
Budget: $20,000,000
Funding Source: To Be Determined
The growth and development of new subdivision projects along the East Cypress Road corridor has necessitated various infrastructure improvements to accommodate the increased traffic volumes on this road. This project will widen and improve East Cypress Road from Jersey Island Road to Bethel Island Road. The improvements will include roadway widening, bicycle lanes, curb and gutter, sidewalks, traffic signals, underground utilities, and median landscaping. The widening will complement the similar improvements that are being constructed on East Cypress Road from Knightsen Avenue to west of Jersey Island Road. The design of this project is underway, and construction is anticipated to start in 2026.

11. Public Works Operations Building Remodeling Project Project # 303
Schedule: Construction is underway
Budget: $260,000
Funding Source: Public Facilities Fund, General Capital Project 42 STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 6
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US The Public Works Operations Building used to be the suite of the former ACE Hardware Store. Since the City purchased this building, there have not been any major improvements related to the office spaces in the building. With the growth of the Public Works Department and increased demands for services from the community, this project will remodel the inside of the building to make a better functional workspace for the staff and their operations. The construction of this project is currently underway.

14. East Cypress Road Widening at CCWD Canal Crossing Project Project # 310
Schedule: Design is underway
Budget: $9,500,000
Funding Source: Traffic Impact Fee, General Capital Project Fund, Gas Tax, and Streets Maintenance and Rehab Fund
CCWD has undertaken the process of replacing the open canal in Oakley from the canal crossing near Main Street and has extended eastwards behind the Cypress Grove, Emerson, Delaney, and Burroughs subdivisions up to east Cypress Road.

CCWD has also undergrounded the remainder of this canal from south of East Cypress Road to its connection point at Rock Slough. The existing canal crosses East Cypress Road and will have to be replaced as part of the City’s East Cypress Road widening project. The City is collaborating with CCWD in all phases of the canal undergrounding project and at the East Cypress Road. The City will take the lead in undergrounding the canal and construction of the new and widened roadway. This project will not only underground approximately 600’ of the open canal, but also widen East Cypress Road to City standards to complement and connect to the improvements that are being constructed on this roadway as part of CIP 247. It is anticipated that the construction of CIP 310 work will start in early 2025.

Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
This item is consistent with the Strategic Plan 27+ Community Health and Safety goals.

Fiscal Impact
Each project listed in this report has a budgeted source of funds which have been approved by the City Council. These sources include Grants, Gas Tax, Measure J Sales Tax, Traffic Impact Fees, General Fund, Main Street Fund, and other Special Use funds. There is no fiscal impact associated with this CIP Update, this report is solely for informational purposes and no funding allocations are requested.
43 STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 7
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US Staff Recommendation
The Oakley City Council should provide comments and input to staff on the CIP report for the Fourth Quarter of FY 2023/24.
44 STAFF REPORT

City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: June 24, 2024
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Troy Faulk, Recreation Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Contract to Quality Sound for the Civic Center Amphitheater Sound System Project – CIP No. 319
Background and Analysis
Throughout each year the Recreation Division hosts special events that are designed to bring residents and visitors to Oakley and activate our downtown area. A key component to these events is the performances that take place on the Civic Center Plaza Stage. Events that utilize the stage for live performances include:
 Concerts in the Park
 Movies in the Park
 Memorial Day Ceremony
 Juneteenth Celebration
 Summer Fest
 Heart of Oakley
 Oaktober Fest
 Veteran’s Day Ceremony
 Holiday Tree Lighting
Currently, each event requires a different sound system set up. For events with live music, the bands bring their own comprehensive, portable sound system and set it up on stage. For smaller events such as the Movie in the Park Series, Recreation Staff will set up a simple portable sound system. For events such as Veteran’s Day and Holiday Tree Lighting the City hires a sound technician to provide and operate a sound system.

In order to address the inconsistent quality of sound that the portable sound system provides, staff is recommending the installation of a professional and permanent sound system that will provide much better sound quality to all events.

Quality Sound is a premiere firm with headquarters in Stockton who specialize in commercial grade Audio/Video systems that are used by government agencies and private institutions. The City has used the services of Quality Sound for design and installation of Audio/Video systems for Council Chambers, Recreation Center, and City Hall for the past years and has been very happy with the products and customer services. Staff had on-site meetings with Quality Sound and discussed the needs for the new Audio system for the Civic Center Park Amphitheater. After the detailed Approved and
Forwarded to the
City Council
45 STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 2
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US evaluation of several Audio systems, the design team of staff at Quality Sound settled on the proposed Audio system that will address the needs of the Amphitheater during various events and festivals and also provide it in a costeffective solution.

Consistency with Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
The Oakley Strategic Plan 27+ highlights upgrading and developing parks and open space as Primary Goals. The plan also includes the Sub-Goal of serving our diverse people, parks and programs by providing inclusive activities and access to engage the City’s family and friends in culture. This investment to the sound system would leave a lasting impact on Civic Center Plaza, allowing the City to offer the highest quality of events and bring more residents and visitors together in the heart of the downtown corridor.

Fiscal Impact
Funding for this project is included in the FY 2024/25 budget under CIP 319 and fully covers the $90,000 cost of this project.

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends adopting a resolution awarding a contract to Quality Sound for CIP 319 Amphitheater Sound System Project.

Attachments

1. Resolution

2. Proposal-Quality Sound
46 RESOLUTION NO. X-24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY

AWARDING A CONTRACT TO QUALITY SOUND FOR THE CIVIC CENTER AMPHITHEATER SOUND SYSTEM PROJECT – CIP NO. 319
WHEREAS, the City has a need for a professional and permanent sound system at the City Hall Amphitheater; and
WHEREAS, Quality Sound has provided services for the City for the Council Chambers, Recreation Center and City Hall and knows the City’s systems; and WHEREAS, Quality Sound has provided a bid or $90,000 for a professional audio system for the Civic Center Amphitheater;
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Oakley hereby approves the Agreement with Quality Sound for the construction of the Amphitheater Speaker Project- CIP Number 319 is approved for an amount not to exceed $90,000, and the City Manager is authorized to execute an Agreement.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of July 2024 by the following vote.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTION:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
___________________
Anissa Williams, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________ ________
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
47 Quality Sound
2010 E. Fremont St.

Stockton, CA 95205
QUOTE
14567
CA 496881 C-7, C-10
DIR 1000000115
ACO 6020

BILL TO JOB LOCATION
Company: City of Oakley Company: City of Oakley Date: 2024-04-17 Address: 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA
94561 Address: 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 Sales Rep: Gary Roda, CTS Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561 Phone: (209) 948 2104 EXT 1074 Contact: Kevin Rohani Contact: Kevin Rohani
Phone: (925) 675 7042 Phone: (925) 625 7003
TITLE
Oakley Civic Center Park Sound System - JBL CBT
Printed: 2024-04-17 Page 1 of 4
48 Quality Sound
2010 E. Fremont St.

Stockton, CA 95205
QUOTE
14567
CA 496881 C-7, C-10
DIR 1000000115
ACO 6020

SCOPE OF WORK
Quality Sound shall provide (furnish and install) a complete sound system for the Civic Park Amphitheater.

The sound system head-end equipment shall all be contained in a LOWELL locking steel wall rack cabinet with fully vented front door installed in the Snack Shack. A SYMETRIX digital signal processor (DSP) shall provide system protection and consistent operation with minimal user training required. On the platform, a custom interface panel mounted in a weatherproof wall box (via conduit provided by others) shall provide XLR inputs for one wired microphone, Left and Right Main and Subwoofer line-level connections for an auxiliary sound mixer, and stereo consumer-level inputs to accept playback of wired sources such as a laptop, smartphone or other music player. Two SHURE handheld digital wireless microphones shall be provided, complete with rechargeable batteries and drop-in recharger dock. A LISTEN TECHNOLGIES Assistive-Listening System Wi-Fi server shall allow broadcast of program material to audience member's personal smart phones over the park's existing Wi-Fi system (network drop to equipment rack by others). The rack shall be provided with a 20A FURMAN AC power sequencer/distribution unit with Master switch, and a simple SYMETRIX menu-driven control panel for system preset recall and limited-range adjustment of specific volume levels.

The main sound system shall include eight (8)  JBL loudspeakers and all required hardware. These loudspeakers shall be securely mounted to the steel pillars at either side other stage platform, configured as two columns of two cabinets per side. Each speaker column shall be provided with an UNDER COVER custom weather cover with removable front panel (black or white in color) for additional protection from the elements. For additional low-frequency support, two (2) portable self-powered JBL dual 18" subwoofers shall be provided, and shall include slip covers and caster kits for protection and ease of portability. Two (2) JBL AWC compact loudspeakers shall be mounted at the shade structure ceiling for foldback monitoring onstage. The main and monitor loudspeakers shall be driven by  CROWN power amplifiers. New install-grade wire shall be pulled (in conduits and j-boxes provided by others) between the head-end and loudspeakers. The entire system shall be fully installed and commissioned, and an In-Service session provided to acquaint staff with operation and maintenance of the new system.

Quality Sound's Scope of work:

Provide all equipment  for systems quoted.

Provide specialty wire and cable for systems quoted only.

Provide specialty back boxes for systems quoted only.

Provide fully-engineered system documentation package.

Final connect at terminal cans and head-end for systems quoted.

Submittals and Drawings in a timely manner as not to impact the schedule.

Tax and normal freight included in price.

Work to be done by others: (Exclusions from Quality Sound's scope of work):

Provide and Install all conduit, non-specialty back boxes, and terminal cans per Approved prints.

Provide required electrical service at proposed locations.

Provide IT assistance and network drop to rack location for integration of Wi-Fi Assistive-Listening System Any associated fees and permits cost is excluded.

Any coring, saw cutting or structural work is excluded.

Installation of all back boxes including specialty back boxes is excluded.

Patch/Paint, weatherproof penetrations and moving of existing fixtures is excluded.

Providing and Installing, Cable Trays, Wire Baskets, and back boards is excluded.

Providing and installing access doors, fire stop sleeves and fire caulking is excluded.

Printed: 2024-04-17 Page 2 of 4
49 Quality Sound
2010 E. Fremont St.

Stockton, CA 95205
QUOTE
14567
CA 496881 C-7, C-10
DIR 1000000115
ACO 6020

MANUFACTURER DESCRIPTION QTY
Lowell Wall Rack 16Ux23D 1.00
Lowell Vented Door 16U 1.00
Furman 20A Advanced Remote Smart Sequencer W/SMP & EVS, 9 Outlets 10Ft Cord 1.00
Ace Backstage Quality Sound Service Panel W/Rj-45 1.00
Netgear 8-Port Gigabit Ethernet Unmanaged Switch 1.00
Symetrix Programmable DSP, 8 mic/line in, 8 line out, ARC 1.00 Symetrix ARC Remote with 2 capacitive buttons, capacitve fader, OLED display 1.00 Ace Backstage Custom 3Ru Panel W/ 1-Gang Switch Cutout (ARC-3) 1.00 Crown Four-channel, 2400W @ 4 Power Amplifier with BLU link, 70V/100V (Mains) 1.00
Crown Two-channel, 300W @ 4 Analog Power Amplifier, 70V/100V (Monitors) 1.00 Shure Dual Wireless Vocal System With Sm58 Handheld transmitters 1.00 Listen Listen EVERYWHERE 2 Channel Wi-Fi Audio Server (ALS) 1.00 RF Venue Diversity Fin Antenna 1.00
RF Venue DFIN Cover 1.00
RDL Consumer Input Jacks Stereo 1.00
FSR Outdoor Wall Box & Cover w/ 2 & 3 Gang Mounting Plate - White 1.00 Ace Backstage Custom Interface Plate for Outdoor Wall Box 1.00 JBL High-Output Two-Way Line Array Column With Highly Adjustable Vertical Coverage 4.00
JBL High-Output Column Extension Speaker 4.00
JBL All-Weather Co-Ax, 8" 2-Way, Black (Monitors) 2.00
Under Cover NY Custom Weather Cover 4.00
Under Cover NY Removable Front Panel 4.00
JBL Sealed Panel Cover (1=2 Pcs) 4.00
JBL 2000 Watt Powered Dual 18" Subwoofer Featuring Crown Amplification 2.00 Deluxe Padded Cover for Subwoofer w/ Casters 2.00
JBL Caster Set Of 4 Swivel Casters 2.00
Shure Dual Docking Station For Slx-D Transmitters And Sb903 Battery 1.00 Shure Lithium-Ion Battery For Slx-D 2.00
West Penn 1P 22G STRD SHLD PVC JKT 1.00
Graybar THHN Building Wire, 12 AWG Stranded Copper Conductor, Black, 500 ft.

Spool 1.00
Graybar THHN Building Wire, 12 AWG Stranded Copper Conductor, Red, 500 ft.

Spool 1.00
Quality Sound Miscellaneous Hardware, cables, connectors 1.00 Quality Sound Use Tax Included in this LUMP SUM quote 1.00 Quality Sound Freight (non-taxable) 1.00
Quality Sound 1 Year Workmanship Warranty 1.00
Subtotal: $90,000.00
Tax: $0.00
Total: $90,000.00
Professional Services Total: $27,550.01
Printed: 2024-04-17 Page 3 of 4
50 Quality Sound
2010 E. Fremont St.

Stockton, CA 95205
QUOTE
14567
CA 496881 C-7, C-10
DIR 1000000115
ACO 6020
TERMS AND CONDITIONS:

Pricing is only good for forty-five days. A signed quote, contract, or P.O. shall be delivered to Quality Sound before any work is started or materials ordered.

Quality Sound is not responsible for delays caused by product availability. Quality Sound's on-site staff will require the work area to be free of obstructions prior to the commencement of any work. In addition, our staff will need unrestricted access to and from the work area and access to the nearest loading area. During service, the work areas should be considered a construction zone. In the interest of public safety, our staff must have priority use of the work areas until the services are complete. Our staff is scheduled to perform only the work included in this quote. If anyone with authority wishes to change or modify the scope of work, please get in touch with our office. If scheduling problems arise, Quality Sound will try to work around those needs. Quality Sound provides a one-year warranty against materials and workmanship defects on the newly installed equipment; manufacturer’s component warranties vary, but many extend past this point. All invoices shall be paid within forty-five days; after forty-five days, interest will be charged at 1.5% per month. Payments are accepted via check, electronic transfer, or cash. A service fee of 3.5% will be charged when paying with a credit card. Thank you again for choosing Quality Sound.

IF YOU WISH TO ACCEPT THIS PROPOSAL AND RELATED STATEMENT OF WORK, PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN BUYER:________________________________
(Print Name)
SIGNATURE:____________________________ DATE:__________________________________ Printed: 2024-04-17 Page 4 of 4
51 STAFF REPORT
City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: July 9, 2024
TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution to Establish Special Speed Zones for Specific City Streets
Background and Analysis
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires that all speed limits in excess of 25 miles per hour be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey conducted in accordance with procedures adopted by Caltrans if they are to be enforceable by the use of police radar. These special speed zone surveys are required to be updated every seven (7) years to continue the use of radar enforcement by police officers.

Speed survey data was collected in April 2024 for preparation of the special speed zone surveys used to establish the speed limits recommended in the attached resolution.

In general, the speed limit of a roadway is set at the nearest five mile per hour interval where eighty-five percent of the vehicles travel at or below the speed, known as the 85th percentile or critical speed. Based on the engineering survey the speed limit can be adjusted downward depending on the physical characteristics of the road, such as abrupt changes in horizontal and/or vertical alignment, and pavement width, so as to enhance its safety. In order for speeding violations to be enforceable in court the Police Department must have current speed zone certifications on file at the courthouse.

The recommended speed limits contained in the attached resolution reflect the current traffic conditions on Bridgehead Road, Empire Avenue, Laurel Road, Live Oak Avenue, Neroly Road, Oakley Road, O’Hara Avenue, Rose Avenue, and Sellers Avenue. The recommended speed limits include maintaining the existing posted speed limits on Bridgehead Road, two segments on Empire Avenue, three segments on Laurel Road, two segments on Live Oak Avenue, three segments on Neroly Road, two segments on Oakley Road and two segments on O’Hara Avenue and Rose Avenue.

Sellers Avenue (East Cypress Road to Delta Road) is recommended to have a speed limit reduction of 5 MPH from the existing speed limit. Adoption of these speed limits will allow enforcement by the use of Police radar.

The recommended speed limits shown in the attached resolution are based on an analysis of the traffic survey data and engineering and traffic studies. Adoption of the attached resolution will approve the recommendations and traffic order of the City Approved and
Forwarded to the
City Council
52 STAFF REPORT
CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 2
O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US Engineer establishing the speed limits on the listed streets consistent with the California Vehicle Code and the City’s Municipal Code.

All traffic surveys used for development of the traffic order were prepared in accordance with the standards adopted by Caltrans. A copy of the surveys, along with a copy of the approved resolution, will be maintained in the Public Works and Engineering files, with a copy in the Police Department and a copy delivered to the Contra Costa County Traffic Court.

Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+
This action is consistent with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+ under the Community Health and Safety goal to provide safe streets. The adopted speed limits for these roadway sections allow the Police Department’s Traffic Enforcement Team to enhance enforcement by having an approved Engineering and Traffic Survey Report to enforce the required speed limits in our roadway network.

Fiscal Impact
Existing speed limit signs will be replaced for the new speed limits, and additional signs will be installed as needed to increase motorist’s awareness of the speed limit and to advise about radar enforcement. The cost of the replacement and additional signs is included in the current Public Works operations budget.

Staff Recommendation
Staff is recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve the speed zones being recommended by the City Engineer as a result of the 2024 Engineering & Traffic Survey prepared by TJKM Transportation Consultants. All segments studied will remain at the current posted speed limit except for Sellers Avenue between East Cypress Road to Delta Road which is recommended for a 5 mile per hour speed reduction based on the current 85th percentile of speeds on this roadway.

Attachments

1. Resolution

2. Engineering and Traffic Survey
53 RESOLUTION NO. ____-24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY ADOPTING A

TRAFFIC ORDER OF THE CITY ENGINEER ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS WHEREAS, in April of 2024, the City Engineer had engineering and traffic surveys conducted for purposes of establishing prima facie speed limits on specific Oakley City streets; and
WHEREAS, on June 27, 2024, a final Engineering and Traffic Survey Report was prepared by TJKM Transportation Consultants outlining the findings of the speed surveys and the recommendations to speed limits on certain roadway segments; and WHEREAS, based on the Engineering and Traffic Survey report, the following listed streets and speed limits are recommended by the City Engineer.

Street___________ Limits____________
Speed Limit
__(mph)__
Study
Date_____
Bridgehead Road Main Street to Wilbur Avenue 45 4/5/2024 Empire Avenue Main Street to Laurel Road 40 4/5/2024
Empire Avenue Laurel Road to Southern City
Limits
45 4/5/2024
Laurel Road O’Hara Avenue to Rose Avenue 40 4/4/2024
Laurel Road Rose Avenue to Main Street 40 4/9/2024
Laurel Road Main Street to Teton Road 35 4/9/2024
Live Oak Avenue Main Street to Oakley Road 35 4/5/2024
Live Oak Avenue Oakley Road to Neroly Road/Live
Oak Avenue
40 4/4/2024
Neroly Road Main Street to Oakley Road 40 4/5/2024
Neroly Road Oakley Road to Live Oak Avenue 45 4/4/2024
Neroly Road Laurel Road to Empire Avenue 50 4/5/2024
54 Oakley Road Empire Avenue to Live Oak
Avenue
35 4/5/2024
Oakley Road Live Oak Avenue to Western City
Limits
45 4/9/2024
O’Hara Avenue West Cypress Road to Laurel
Road
35 4/5/2024
O’Hara Avenue Laurel Road to Neroly Road 40 4/5/2024
Rose Avenue Laurel Road to Simoni Ranch
Road
40 4/5/2024
Sellers Avenue East Cypress Road to Delta Road 45 4/9/2024 NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Oakley hereby resolves to approve the recommendations and Traffic Order of the City Engineer as listed above.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oakley at a meeting held on the 9th day of July 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTIONS:

APPROVED:
___________________
Anissa Williams, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________ ___________________
Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date
55 June 27, 2024
2024 Engineering & Traffic Survey
City of Oakley, CA
56 Engineering and Traffic Survey
June 27, 2024
City of Oakley, California
57 i
This Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey has been prepared under the direction of a licensed Civil Engineer. The licensed Civil Engineer attests to the technical information contained therein, and has judged the qualifications of any technical specialists providing engineering data, which recommendations, conclusions and decisions are based. These surveys conform to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommend speed limits appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

Prepared By:
____________________________
Anna Vickroy, PE, TE
Senior Transportation Engineer, TJKM
4305 Hacienda Drive, Suite 550
Pleasanton, CA 94588-2798
Tel: 925.463.0611
Fax: 925.463.3691
58 ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................1

1.1 Relevant California Vehicle Code Sections .................................................................................................................6

2.0 Data Collection and Analysis ...................................................................................................................11

2.1 Radar Speed Surveys and Analysis ..............................................................................................................................11

2.2 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Volumes..........................................................................................................................12

2.3 Field Observations..............................................................................................................................................................13

2.4 Traffic Collision Data..........................................................................................................................................................17

3.0 Speed Limit Recommendations...............................................................................................................23 TABLES
Table 1: Survey Segments.................................................................................................................................................................3 Table 2: Examples of Applicability of Rounding and Speed Limit Reductions on Local Agency Roadways....8 Table 3: Safety Corridor Definition Requirements...................................................................................................................8 Table 4: Land Uses and Facilities that Generate High Concentrations of Bicyclists and/or Pedestrians...........9 Table 5: Speed Survey Summary................................................................................................................................................. 14 Table 6: Average Daily Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................................................... 15 Table 7: Collision History Summary (Jan. 2018 – Dec. 2022)............................................................................................ 19 Table 8: Collision History Comparison with Statewide Averages................................................................................... 21 Table 9: Recommended Speed Limits Summary .................................................................................................................. 26 59 iii

FIGURES
Figure 1: Types of Speed Limits......................................................................................................................................................1 Figure 2: Survey Locations ................................................................................................................................................................4 Figure 3: Existing Speed Limits........................................................................................................................................................5 Figure 4: Average Daily Traffic Volumes................................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 5: Collision Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................ 22 Figure 6: Illustration of Examples of Applicability of Rounding and Speed Limit Reductions on Local Agency Roadways................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Figure 7: Recommended Speed Limit Changes .................................................................................................................... 27 Figure 8: Recommended Speed Limits ..................................................................................................................................... 28

APPENDICES
Appendix – Recommended Speed Limit Certifications and Supporting Data (Speed Survey Collection Forms and Average Daily Traffic Volumes)
60 1 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY |

1.0 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the posted speed limits for 17 segments within the City of Oakley and recommend speed limit changes, if any, in accordance with the State of California regulations and guidelines. CVC Section 40802 requires that Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) for speed limits should be conducted at least once every seven or 14 years based on established criteria. State and local agencies re-evaluate non-statutory speed limits on their street segments that have undergone a significant change in roadway characteristics or surrounding land uses since the speed limits were last reviewed.

The California State Legislature sets in place the regulations for California speed limits and the California Vehicle Code (CVC) places these regulations into language used primarily for enforcement purposes.

Various jurisdictions have responsibility for roadways throughout California, including the responsibility to set speed limits on these roadways according to the standards and procedures established by Caltrans.

The guidelines from the California Manual for Setting Speed Limits published by Caltrans (Rev. February, 2020) are used in this study. These guidelines help in establishing speed limits that are uniform throughout the state and avoid influence from political pressure or emotional perceptions.

Speed limits are established primarily for protecting the public from the behavior of reckless, unreliable, or dangerous drivers. Speed limits are generally established at or near the 85th percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed, also referred to as the critical speed, is defined as the speed at or below which 85 percent of traffic is moving in free flow conditions. Speed limits established on this basis conform to the consensus of those who drive on the roadways as to what speed is reasonable and safe under normal driving conditions. Figure 1 illustrates the various speed limit signs for different zones and roadways.

Figure 1: Types of Speed Limits
Many factors influence drivers and their perception of the safe speed at which to operate a vehicle. These factors should be considered as a whole because it is not practical to consider each individually. The design and physical characteristics of the roadway place limitations on the safe operating speed of vehicles. These characteristics include:
• Roadway geometrics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance Source: FHWA
61 2 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY |
• Roadside development, zoning, and environment
• Parking practices
• Bicycle and pedestrian activity
• Driveway density
• Signalized or stop-controlled intersections
• Rural, residential or developed areas
The study follows the goals and visions set in the 2022 City of Oakley General Plan. The City of Oakley aims to guide the City's transportation system and address issues related to mobility and access. Some of the goals outlined in the Circulation Element include:
• Prioritization and construction of complete streets that improve circulation and access for all modes of travel
• Provision of measures necessary to enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety and mobility • Support for increased public transit usage
• Encourage increased bicycle usage
• Enforcement of traffic laws.

The recommendations made in this study comply with the vision and goals identified in the General Plan.

This report presents the results of the E&TS conducted from March 2024 to May 2024 for 17 street segments throughout the City of Oakley, and incorporates input from radar speed surveys, average daily traffic counts, segment collision analyses, and analyses of roadway characteristics. The 17 survey segments included in the study are listed in Table 1, are shown in Figure 2, and are categorized below by roadway type:
• Three segments are designated as ‘Collectors’
• 10 segments are designated as ‘Major Arterials’
• Four segments are designated as ‘Minor Arterials’
The existing speed limits for the survey segments are illustrated in Figure 3. 62 3 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY |
Table 1: Survey Segments
No. Street Survey Limits Roadway
Classification
Roadway
Type
No. of
Lanes
Width
(feet)
Length
(miles)
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
1 Bridgehead
Road
Main Street to
Wilbur Avenue Major Arterial Undivided 2 26 0.41 45
2 Empire
Avenue
Main Street to Laurel
Road Major Arterial Divided 4 70 1.08 40
3 Empire
Avenue
Laurel Road to
Southern City limits Major Arterial Divided 4 80 0.82 45 4 Laurel
Road
O'Hara Avenue to
Rose Avenue Major Arterial Divided 4 80 0.49 40
5 Laurel
Road
Rose Avenue to Main
Street Major Arterial Divided 4 80 0.50 40
6 Laurel
Road
Main Street to Teton
Road Major Arterial Undivided 2 40 0.50 35
7 Live Oak
Avenue
Main Street to
Oakley Road Major Arterial Undivided 2 20 0.50 35
8 Live Oak
Avenue
Oakley Road to
Neroly Road/Live
Oak Road
Collector Undivided 2 26 1.12 40
9 Neroly
Road
Main Street to
Oakley Road Major Arterial Undivided 2 22 0.50 40
10 Neroly
Road
Oakley Road to Live
Oak Avenue Minor Arterial Undivided 2 36 1.31 45
11 Neroly
Road
Laurel Road to
Empire Avenue Minor Arterial Undivided 2 30 0.69 50
12 Oakley
Road
Empire Avenue to
Live Oak Avenue Major Arterial Divided 3 62 0.53 35
13 Oakley
Road
Live Oak Avenue to
Western City limits Minor Arterial Undivided 2 20 0.74 45 14 O'Hara
Avenue
West Cypress Road
to Laurel Road Collector Divided 4 78 1.00 35
15 O'Hara
Avenue
Laurel Road to
Neroly Road Major Arterial Undivided 3 50 1.00 40
16 Rose
Avenue
Laurel Road to
Simoni Ranch Road Collector Undivided 2 40 0.50 40
17 Sellers
Avenue
East Cypress Road to
Delta Road Minor Arterial Undivided 2 24 1.51 50
63 0 0.5 1 2
Miles
1 ST

MAIN ST

SELLERS AVE

EMPIRE RD

E CYPRESS RD

EMPIRE AVE

OHARA AVE

LIVE OAK AVE

O'HARA AVE

BROWN RD
LARIAT
LN

ROSE AVE

OAKLEY RD

LAUREL RD

MALICOAT AVE DOYLE RD

TETON RD

FALL LN

BRIDGEHEAD RD

BIG BEAR RD
BIG
B
REA
K
R
D

FERNWOOD DR

NEROLY RD

OAKLEY RD

NEROLY RD

NEROLY RD

NEROLY RD

MAIN ST

LAUREL RD
1 ST

SELLERS AVE

MAIN ST MAIN ST

WILBUR AVE

E CYPRESS RD

E CYPRESS RD

LAUREL RD

MAIN ST

MAIN ST

SIMONI RANCH RD
Figure 2: Study Segments
Bridgehead Road - Main St. to Wilbur Ave.

Empire Avenue - Main St. to Laurel Rd.

Empire Avenue - Laurel Rd. to South City Limits
Laurel Road - O'Hara Ave. to Rose Ave.

Laurel Road - Rose Ave. to Main St.

Laurel Road - Main St. to Teton Rd.

Live Oak Avenue - Main St. to Oakley Rd.

Live Oak Avenue - Oakley Rd. to Neroly Rd.

Neroly Road - Main St. to Oakley Rd.

Neroly Road - Oakley Rd. to Live Oak Ave.

Neroly Road - Laurel Rd. to Empire Ave.

Oakley Road - Empire Ave. to Live Oak Ave.

Oakley Road - Live Oak Ave. to West City Limits
O'Hara Avenue - W. Cypress Rd. to Laurel Rd.

O'Hara Avenue - Laurel Rd. to Neroly Rd.

Rose Avenue - Laurel Rd. to Simoni Ranch Rd.

Sellers Avenue - E. Cypress Rd. to Delta Rd.

Study Segments
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 9
17 1
2 3
4 5 6
7 8
9 10
11 13 12
15 16 17
14 64
1 2
3 4 5 6
7 8
9 10
11 13 12
14 15
16 17
0 0.5 1 2
Miles
1 ST

MAIN ST

SELLERS AVE

EMPIRE RD

E CYPRESS RD

EMPIRE AVE

OHARA AVE

LIVE OAK AVE

O'HARA AVE

BROWN RD
LARIAT
LN

ROSE AVE

OAKLEY RD

LAUREL RD

MALICOAT AVE DOYLE RD

TETON RD

FALL LN

BRIDGEHEAD RD

BIG BEAR RD

BIG BREA
K
R
D

FERNWOOD DR

NEROLY RD

OAKLEY RD

NEROLY RD

NEROLY RD

NEROLY RD

MAIN ST

LAUREL RD
1 ST

SELLERS AVE

MAIN ST MAIN ST

WILBUR AVE

E CYPRESS RD

E CYPRESS RD

LAUREL RD

MAIN ST

MAIN ST

SIMONI RANCH RD
Figure 3: Existing Speed Limits
Bridgehead Road - Main St. to Wilbur Ave.

Empire Avenue - Main St. to Laurel Rd.

Empire Avenue - Laurel Rd. to South City Limits
Laurel Road - O'Hara Ave. to Rose Ave.

Laurel Road - Rose Ave. to Main St.

Laurel Road - Main St. to Teton Rd.

Live Oak Avenue - Main St. to Oakley Rd.

Live Oak Avenue - Oakley Rd. to Neroly Rd.

Neroly Road - Main St. to Oakley Rd.

Neroly Road - Oakley Rd. to Live Oak Ave.

Neroly Road - Laurel Rd. to Empire Ave.

Oakley Road - Empire Ave. to Live Oak Ave.

Oakley Road - Live Oak Ave. to West City Limits
O'Hara Avenue - W. Cypress Rd. to Laurel Rd.

O'Hara Avenue - Laurel Rd. to Neroly Rd.

Rose Avenue - Laurel Rd. to Simoni Ranch Rd.

Sellers Avenue - E. Cypress Rd. to Delta Rd.

Study Segments
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 9
17 0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
LEGEND
Roads
XX Segment ID
Existing Speed Limits
35 mph
40 mph
City of Oakley
45 mph
50 mph
65 6 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY |

1.1 Relevant California Vehicle Code Sections
Applicable California Vehicle Code (CVC) Code sections for conducting an E&TS are summarized below:

CVC SECTION 235 – BUSINESS DISTRICT: An area in which at least 50 percent of the properties are used for business for a minimum distance of 400 feet on one side or 300 feet on both sides of a highway.

CVC SECTION 515 – RESIDENCE DISTRICT: An area outside of the Business District along a highway that has a minimum of 13 separate dwelling units on one side, or 16 on both sides within a distance of a quarter mile.

CVC SECTION 627 – ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY: A survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for use by state and local authorities, which shall include consideration of prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements, collision records, and highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. Local authorities may also consider residential district density (as defined in Section 515) and pedestrian and bicyclist safety.

CVC SECTION 22349 – MAXIMUM SPEED LIMITS: Provides that no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 mph. An exception to this, as stated in CVC Section 22356, is that Caltrans may increase the speed and these increases can only be made after consultation with the California Highway Patrol (CHP) and based on an engineering and traffic survey. Even if the maximum speed is raised, certain vehicles are still not permitted to be driven over 55 mph. These are listed below:
• Motor trucks having three or more axles or any truck towing another vehicle • Passenger vehicles towing other vehicles
• School buses transporting school pupils
• Farm labor vehicles transporting passengers
• Vehicles transporting explosives
CVC SECTION 22350 – BASIC SPEED LAW: Provides that no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. In other words, a driver violates the basic speed law if he or she is driving at unsafe speeds, even if that speed is lower than the posted regulatory speed limit sign.

CVC SECTION 22351 – SPEED LAW VIOLATIONS: States that the speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in CVC Section 22352 or established as authorized in the CVC is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the Basic Speed Law. This same section also states that the speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in CVC Section 22352 or established as authorized in the CVC is unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence 66 7 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY |
that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the Basic Speed Law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.

CVC SECTION 22352 – PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS: Establishes prima facie speed limits for local roads and streets. The term “prima facie”, as used in the CVC, is a speed limit that applies when no other specific speed limit is posted. It is a Latin term meaning “at first face” or “at first appearance”. It is also defined as “first view” and “before investigation”. Prima facie evidence is evidence sufficient to establish fact, or to raise presumption of fact, unless rebutted. These speed limits shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in the CVC and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof. It sets two speed limits covering six classes of location.

A speed limit of 15 mph applies at railroad crossings, at uncontrolled highway intersections with obstructed view, and on alleys. A speed limit of 25 mph applies on any highway other than State highways in any business or residence district, unless a different limit is established by procedures described in the CVC. The 25 mph limit also applies in school zones.

CVC SECTION 22357 (INCREASE OF LOCAL SPEED LIMITS TO 65 MPH) AND CVC SECTION 22358 (DECREASE OF LOCAL SPEED LIMITS): Authorizes local authorities to establish prima facie speed limits on streets and roads under their jurisdiction, on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey.

CVC SECTION 22358.3 (DECREASE ON NARROW STREETS) AND CVC SECTION 22358.4 (DECREASE OF LOCAL LIMITS NEAR SCHOOLS OR SENIOR CENTERS): Authorizes local agencies to reduce prima facie speed limits to 20 or 15 mph on narrow streets (with roadway width less than 25 feet), school zones, or senior centers on the basis of engineering and traffic surveys.

CVC SECTION 22358.5 – DOWNWARD SPEED ZONING: Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade, and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning.

CVC SECTION 22358.6 – ROUNDING OF SPEED LIMITS: Authorizes local agencies to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile speed of the free-flowing traffic. In cases where the 85th percentile speed results in rounding up to the nearest five-mile per hour increment, the local authority may round the speed limit down to the lower five-mile per hour increment. Local authorities may additionally lower the speed limit as provided by CVC Section 22358.7 and CVC Section 22358.8.

CVC SECTION 22358.7 – 5 MPH SPEED LIMIT REDUCTION: Authorizes local agencies to reduce the speed limit by an additional 5 mph if the portion of highway has been designated as a “safety corridor,” as defined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) and in Table 3, or if the portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, senior, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.
67 8 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY |
The procedure of rounding speed limits according to CVC Section 22358.6 and CVC Section 22358.7 is tabulated in Table 2.

Table 2: Examples of Applicability of Rounding and Speed Limit Reductions on Local Agency Roadways 85th-Percentile
Speed (mph)
Rounding to
nearest 5 mph
increment
(CVC 22358.6(a))
If rounding to
nearest is up, may
round down
(CVC 22358.6(c))
If rounding to
nearest is down,
may additionally
lower by 5 mph
(CVC 22358.6(b))
If safety corridor or
adjacent to high
concentration of
bicyclists & pedestrians,
may additionally lower
by 5 mph
(CVC 22358.7)

47.5-50.0 50 45 No 40

45.1-47.4 45 No 40 35

42.5-45.0 45 40 No 35

40.1-42.4 40 No 35 30
Source: 2014 CA MUTCD, Revision 7, Table 2B-104(CA)
Table 3: Safety Corridor Definition Requirements
Category Factors
Crash Weighting Factors to Develop One
Serious/Fatal Injury Safety Corridor
Crash weighting can be developed using fatal and serious injury crash data and other factors to prioritize safety corridors. Suggested weighting factors are as follows:
• Crash severity: Fatal Crashes, Serious Injury Crashes • Mode: Pedestrian-bicycle related crashes,
vehicle/other
• Disadvantaged Community Status: MPO/RTPA or
locally defined disadvantaged community status
based on most current version of CalEnviroScreen
• Vulnerable Populations: Seniors (age 65 and older)
and Youth (under age 15) based on the American
Community Survey
• School proximity (within 0.25 miles) based on the
California School Campus Database
Crash Density
Each roadway segment block can be converted into ~ 0.25 mile overlapping "corridor" segments to create a consistent unit of measurement and assess the concentration of linear patterns of injuries within a define[d] distance. The highest scoring (i.e. most fatal and serious injury crashes per mile) "corridor" segments within a street needs to be identified and an appropriate threshold set to determine safety corridor eligibility.

Maintenance
The jurisdiction can establish a review and re-evaluation frequency for safety corridors. However, such frequency need not exceed seven years.

Source: 2014 CA MUTCD, Revision 7, Table 2B-105(CA)
68 9 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY |
Table 4: Land Uses and Facilities that Generate High Concentrations of Bicyclists and/or Pedestrians Category Generator
Land Use
Employment centers
Presence of retail
Parks, multi-use trails, and recreational destinations
Schools/universities
Senior Centers
Cultural areas, entertainment space areas, or areas of community significance
Religious facilities
Health/medical facilities
Transit Factors Transit stops
Transit Oriented Developments/Transit Priority Areas
Presence of Pedestrian/Bicyclist Infrastructure
Sidewalk presence
Crosswalk presence
Bikeway presence
Nearby signalized intersections on four-way intersections Presence of micromobility devices such as bicycles or scooters Demographic Factors
Presence of vulnerable groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused
MPO/RTPA or locally defined disadvantaged community status Presence of students (all levels)
Local Data Need identified in a safety analysis such as a road safety audit or formalized planning document such as a local road safety plan Source: 2014 CA MUTCD, Revision 7, Table 2B-106(CA)
CVC SECTION 22358.8 – RETAINMENT OF LOCAL SPEED LIMIT: Authorizes local agencies to retain an existing speed limit on a portion of highway if it was established in a previous E&TS with a speed limit certification sheet and if a registered traffic engineer has determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the portion of highway since completion of the previous E&TS.

CVC SECTION 40802 (A)(2) – PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS: Provides that prima facie speed limits established under CVC Sections 22352(b)(1), 22354, 22357, 22358, and 22358.3 may not be enforced by radar unless the speed limit has been justified by an engineering and traffic survey within the last five years. This CVC section does not apply to a local street, road or school zone.

CVC SECTION 40802 (B) – PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS: For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as "local" on the "California Road System Maps," that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation.

When a street or road does not appear on the "California Road System Maps," it may be defined as a "local street or road" if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
69 10 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY | • Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
• Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in CVC Section 445.
• Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
70 11 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY |

2.0 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The basic purpose of this study is to evaluate selected arterial, collector, and local streets within the City of Oakley limits and to recommend appropriate speed limit revisions consistent with current laws and practices of California. The TJKM team, in coordination with the City of Oakley staff, coordinated the E&TS.

The data collection procedure and speed survey analysis methodology is briefly discussed below.

2.1 Radar Speed Surveys and Analysis
The speed surveys involve the use of radar guns to collect sample speeds on selected street segments. A key aspect for conducting the surveys is to ensure that street segments with unique characteristics are individually surveyed. The most crucial component of a speed zone survey is the selection of locations for the data collection task. The prevailing speed at the data collection point was selected to be representative of the entire speed zone area.

The project team worked with the City of Oakley staff and finalized the 17 street segments to be analyzed in this E&TS. Radar speed surveys were conducted in spring 2024 on days with fair weather, clear visibility, and dry pavement conditions. The survey locations were selected where the prevailing speeds were representative of the entire street segment and were not too close to any traffic control device. The selected locations were situated beyond the influence of stops, dips, curves, parked vehicles, and any other condition that may affect the normal rate of travel. An effort was made to ensure that the presence of radar survey equipment did not affect the speed of the traffic being surveyed.

The radar speed surveys were conducted for all study segments, using calibrated radar equipment by certified technicians. Most samples sizes for a particular segment include around 100 vehicles. In the case of low volume roadways, surveys were conducted for a minimum of a 90 minute period.

A Speed Survey Form was used to collect and summarize the following attributes:
• Street surveyed
• Precise location
• Street direction
• Date/day of the survey
• Start time & end time of survey
• Number of vehicles surveyed
• 85th percentile speed, 50th percentile speed, 10 mile pace • Percent and number of vehicles observed within the 10 mph pace speed • Percent and number of vehicles observed below pace
• Percent and number of vehicles observed above pace
• Range of speeds observed and standard deviation
71 12 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY | A description of some of the attributes is provided below:
50TH PERCENTILE SPEED (MEDIAN SPEED): The speed above and below which 50 percent of the sample speeds were observed. This value indicates the speed that a driver may choose to drive without the influence of any speed limits, speed signs, or enforcement. 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED (CRITICAL SPEED): The speed at or below which 85 percent of the sample speeds were observed. The 85th percentile speed of a spot speed survey is the primary indicator of the appropriate speed limit for a section of the roadway.
10 MPH PACE SPEED: The 10 mph increment (range) of speeds containing the greatest number of vehicles. In most cases, the 85th percentile speed and the recommended speed lie within the range, frequently in the middle to upper range of the interval. The percent of vehicles that fall within the pace speed is an indicator of the bunching of vehicular speeds. The number of observed vehicles within the 10 mph pace is often between 40 and 80 percent of the entire sample.

AVERAGE SPEED: The average speed is simply the cumulative speed divided by the number of observed vehicles.

SPEED RANGE: The range of speed is simply the difference in speeds of the fastest and slowest vehicles observed. A large range of speeds (in excess of 30 mph, for example) indicates less favorable conditions than a smaller range. The greater the range, the more inconsistency in travel speeds with a greater likelihood of traffic collisions. In general, uniform speeds result in a smooth progression of traffic.

The radar speed survey data was compiled and analyzed to determine the 50th percentile speed, the 85th percentile speed, the average speed, the speed range, the 10 mph pace speed, and the percent of vehicles observed within the 10 mph pace.

Table 5 presents the speed survey summary with existing speed limits, median speed, critical speed, 10 mile pace speed, and the percent of vehicles observed within pace. The completed speed survey forms for all 17 study segments are included in the Appendix.

2.2 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Volumes
The TJKM team collected average daily traffic (ADT) counts for all study segments by conducting tube counts along the segments. These counts were used to determine the collision rates for each segment, which in turn was used as a factor in determining the appropriate speed limit for each segment. Table 6 summarizes the roadway classification and ADT volumes for each study segment. The existing ADT volumes for the survey segments are illustrated in Figure 4. The ADT counts are available in the Appendix.
72 13 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY |

2.3 Field Observations
A final field check was conducted by driving each study segment while “floating” with prevailing traffic to determine the speed of traffic that is reasonable from the engineer’s viewpoint. The traffic engineer evaluates the appropriateness of the 85th percentile speed and adds the perspective of human judgment to set the appropriate speed limit. Factors such as roadside development, the number and location of driveways, parked vehicles; emergency shoulder areas, schools and playgrounds, areas frequented by pedestrians, horizontal and vertical alignment of the roadway, intersection spacing, visibility and control, landscaping, street fixtures, and other less tangible factors, all contribute to finalizing the recommended speed limits.
73 14 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY | Table 5: Speed Survey Summary
No. Street Survey Limits
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
No.

Speed
Data
Collected
Median
(mph)
85th
Percentile
(mph)
10-
Mile
Pace
(mph)
Percent
w/in
Pace
1 Bridgehead
Road
Main Street to Wilbur
Avenue 45 159 40 45 34-43 74%
2 Empire Avenue Main Street to Laurel
Road 40 130 39 44 35-44 79%
3 Empire Avenue Laurel Road to
Southern City limits 45 202 43 49 37-46 66%
4 Laurel Road O'Hara Avenue to
Rose Avenue 40 156 42 44 36-45 90%
5 Laurel Road Rose Avenue to Main
Street 40 112 37 40 32-41 87%
6 Laurel Road Main Street to Teton
Road 35 118 35 41 30-39 69%
7 Live Oak
Avenue
Main Street to Oakley
Road 35 138 35 41 29-38 64%
8 Live Oak
Avenue
Oakley Road to
Neroly Road/Live Oak
Road
40 172 39 43 35-44 92%
9 Neroly Road Main Street to Oakley
Road 40 175 38 43 32-41 67%
10 Neroly Road Oakley Road to Live
Oak Avenue 45 168 41 46 35-44 76%
11 Neroly Road Laurel Road to Empire
Avenue 50 141 48 52 43-52 84%
12 Oakley Road Empire Avenue to Live
Oak Avenue 35 126 35 40 31-40 68%
13 Oakley Road Live Oak Avenue to
Western City limits 45 153 41 48 38-47 61%
14 O'Hara Avenue West Cypress Road to
Laurel Road 35 121 36 40 32-41 82%
15 O'Hara Avenue Laurel Road to Neroly
Road 40 125 41 46 35-44 75%
16 Rose Avenue Laurel Road to Simoni
Ranch Road 40 125 38 42 34-43 74%
17 Sellers Avenue East Cypress Road to
Delta Road 50 120 43 47 38-47 74%
74 15 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY | Table 6: Average Daily Traffic Volumes
No. Street Survey Limits Direction Roadway
Classification
No.
of
Lanes
Average Daily Traffic Volumes
NB/EB SB/WB Two Way
Total
1 Bridgehead
Road
Main Street to
Wilbur Avenue NB/SB Major Arterial 2 4,441 4,589 9,030
2 Empire
Avenue
Main Street to
Laurel Road NB/SB Major Arterial 4 9,726 10,702 20,428
3 Empire
Avenue
Laurel Road to
Southern City
limits
NB/SB Major Arterial 4 6,701 8,016 14,717
4 Laurel
Road
O'Hara Avenue
to Rose Avenue EB/WB Major Arterial 4 9,620 10,432 20,052 5 Laurel
Road
Rose Avenue to
Main Street EB/WB Major Arterial 4 7,855 7,937 15,792
6 Laurel
Road
Main Street to
Teton Road EB/WB Major Arterial 2 3,455 3,421 6,876
7 Live Oak
Avenue
Main Street to
Oakley Road NB/SB Major Arterial 2 1,632 1,201 2,833
8 Live Oak
Avenue
Oakley Road to
Neroly
Road/Live Oak
Road
NB/SB Collector 2 2,269 2,110 4,379
9 Neroly
Road
Main Street to
Oakley Road NB/SB Major Arterial 2 2,802 2,924 5,726
10 Neroly
Road
Oakley Road to
Live Oak Avenue NB/SB Minor Arterial 2 1,593 1,960 3,553 11 Neroly
Road
Laurel Road to
Empire Avenue NB/SB Minor Arterial 2 2,363 2,947 5,310
12 Oakley
Road
Empire Avenue
to Live Oak
Avenue
EB/WB Major Arterial 3 2,106 2,095 4,201
13 Oakley
Road
Live Oak Avenue
to Western City
limits
EB/WB Minor Arterial 2 1,657 1,383 3,040
14 O'Hara
Avenue
West Cypress
Road to Laurel
Road
NB/SB Collector 4 4,073 4,173 8,246
15 O'Hara
Avenue
Laurel Road to
Neroly Road NB/SB Major Arterial 3 4,570 5,035 9,605
16 Rose
Avenue
Laurel Road to
Simoni Ranch
Road
NB/SB Collector 2 840 914 1,754
17 Sellers
Avenue
East Cypress
Road to Delta
Road
NB/SB Minor Arterial 2 2,705 2,761 5,466
75 0 0.5 1 2
Miles
1 ST

MAIN ST

SELLERS AVE

EMPIRE RD

E CYPRESS RD

EMPIRE AVE

OHARA AVE

LIVE OAK AVE

O'HARA AVE

BROWN RD
LARIAT
LN

ROSE AVE

OAKLEY RD

LAUREL RD

MALICOAT AVE DOYLE RD

TETON RD

FALL LN

BRIDGEHEAD RD

BIG BEAR RD

BIG BREA
K
R
D

FERNWOOD DR

NEROLY RD

OAKLEY RD

NEROLY RD

NEROLY RD

NEROLY RD

MAIN ST

LAUREL RD
1 ST

SELLERS AVE

MAIN ST MAIN ST

WILBUR AVE

E CYPRESS RD

E CYPRESS RD

LAUREL RD

MAIN ST

MAIN ST

SIMONI RANCH RD
Figure 4: Daily Trac Count
Bridgehead Road - Main St. to Wilbur Ave.

Empire Avenue - Main St. to Laurel Rd.

Empire Avenue - Laurel Rd. to South City Limits
Laurel Road - O'Hara Ave. to Rose Ave.

Laurel Road - Rose Ave. to Main St.

Laurel Road - Main St. to Teton Rd.

Live Oak Avenue - Main St. to Oakley Rd.

Live Oak Avenue - Oakley Rd. to Neroly Rd.

Neroly Road - Main St. to Oakley Rd.

Neroly Road - Oakley Rd. to Live Oak Ave.

Neroly Road - Laurel Rd. to Empire Ave.

Oakley Road - Empire Ave. to Live Oak Ave.

Oakley Road - Live Oak Ave. to West City Limits
O'Hara Avenue - W. Cypress Rd. to Laurel Rd.

O'Hara Avenue - Laurel Rd. to Neroly Rd.

Rose Avenue - Laurel Rd. to Simoni Ranch Rd.

Sellers Avenue - E. Cypress Rd. to Delta Rd.

Study Segments
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 9
17 1
2 3
4 5 6
7 8
9 10
11 13 12
15 16 17
14 LEGEND
Roads
XX
XX Segment ID
City of Oakley
Study Segment
XXXX Daily Traffic Count
9,030 5,726
2,833 4,379
20,428
8,246 9,605
1,754
5,466
14,717
3,553
5,310
3,040 4,201
20,052 15,792 6,876
76 17 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY |

2.4 Traffic Collision Data
Collisions reported at study segments were obtained from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database for a period of five years from January 2018 to December 2022. Collision rates are a significant factor in determining the appropriate speed limits.

Table 7 summarizes the type and the total number of collisions for all study segments. Table 8 and Figure 5 summarize the collision rates for the study segments in comparison with the statewide averages.

Live Oak Avenue from Main Street to Oakley Road (Study Segment 7) had a particularly high collision rate that was over three times the statewide average collision rate for a comparable roadway. One contributing factor to the high collision rate may be the relatively low traffic volume on Study Segment 7. Another contributing factor is that all of the collisions identified for Study Segment 7 are located at the intersection with Main Street, which has higher traffic volumes and speeds compared to Live Oak Avenue. Therefore, this collision rate is artificially high and not indicative of speed related issues on the Live Oak Avenue segment.

Definitions for Collision Types: The types of collisions and their definitions are defined by CHP and are listed below:

Head-On: Two motor vehicles, approaching from opposite directions, make direct contact. For example, the front of one vehicle collides with the front of another, or prior to impact, one vehicle skids sideways, causing the side of the skidding vehicle to collide with the front of the other.

Sideswipe: One motor vehicle strikes the side of another with a glancing blow. For example, two vehicles are proceeding in the same direction or from opposite directions, and the side of one vehicle strikes the side of the other.

Rear End: Two motor vehicles, traveling in the same direction, make direct contact. For example, the front of one vehicle strikes the rear of another vehicle, or Vehicle #1 approaches Vehicle #2 from the rear and skids sideways during a braking action, causing the side of Vehicle #1 to strike the rear of Vehicle #2.

Broadside: One motor vehicle strikes another vehicle at an angle greater than that of a sideswipe.

Hit Object: A motor vehicle strikes a fixed object or other object.

Overturned: A motor vehicle overturns and no prior collision or hitting an object caused the overturning. This would include a motorcyclist losing control, causing the vehicle to lie down on its side.

Auto/Ped: A vehicle strikes a pedestrian.
77 18 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY | Other: A collision not covered in the preceding elements. This entry shall be explained in the narrative, such as a vehicle involved with - a bicycle, train, or animal; an automobile fire; passengers falling or jumping from a vehicle; a vehicle backing; a bicycle involved with a pedestrian or another bicycle, etc. 78 19 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY | Table 7: Collision History Summary (Jan. 2018 – Dec. 2022) No. Street Survey Limits
Total No.
of
Collisions
Collision Type Collision Severity
HeadOn Sideswipe Rear
End Broadside Hit Object Overturned Auto/Ped Other Fatal Severe Injury Other
Visible
Injury
Injury:

Complaint
of Pain
Property
Damage
Only
1 Bridgehead
Road
Main Street to
Wilbur Avenue 4 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3
2 Empire
Avenue
Main Street to
Laurel Road 39 2 2 12 13 8 1 1 0 0 1 3 10 25
3 Empire
Avenue
Laurel Road to
Southern City
limits
5 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3
4 Laurel
Road
O'Hara Avenue to
Rose Avenue 15 0 1 9 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 4 10
5 Laurel
Road
Rose Avenue to
Main Street 9 0 0 3 4 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 8
6 Laurel
Road
Main Street to
Teton Road 4 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3
7 Live Oak
Avenue
Main Street to
Oakley Road 9 0 1 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 7
8 Live Oak
Avenue
Oakley Road to
Neroly Road/Live
Oak Road
6 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
9 Neroly
Road
Main Street to
Oakley Road 3 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2
10 Neroly
Road
Oakley Road to
Live Oak Avenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Neroly
Road
Laurel Road to
Empire Avenue 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
12 Oakley
Road
Empire Avenue to
Live Oak Avenue 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
13 Oakley
Road
Live Oak Avenue
to Western City
limits
3 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2
14 O'Hara
Avenue
West Cypress
Road to Laurel
Road
6 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5
15 O'Hara
Avenue
Laurel Road to
Neroly Road 15 0 1 5 5 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 11
16 Rose
Avenue
Laurel Road to
Simoni Ranch
Road
1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
79 20 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY | No. Street Survey Limits
Total No.
of
Collisions
Collision Type Collision Severity
HeadOn Sideswipe Rear
End Broadside Hit Object Overturned Auto/Ped Other Fatal Severe Injury Other
Visible
Injury
Injury:

Complaint
of Pain
Property
Damage
Only
17 Sellers
Avenue
East Cypress Road
to Delta Road 5 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5
80 21 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY | Table 8: Collision History Comparison with Statewide Averages No. Street Survey Limits
No. of Collisions Collision
Rate
State Average
Collision Rate
(2021)
Less than
State
Average?
(Jan 1, 2018 -
Dec 31, 2022)
1 Bridgehead Road Main Street to
Wilbur Avenue 4 0.60 1.11 Yes
2 Empire Avenue Main Street to
Laurel Road 39 0.97 1.04 Yes
3 Empire Avenue
Laurel Road to
Southern City
limits
5 0.23 1.04 Yes
4 Laurel Road O'Hara Avenue to
Rose Avenue 15 0.83 1.04 Yes
5 Laurel Road Rose Avenue to
Main Street 9 0.63 1.04 Yes
6 Laurel Road Main Street to
Teton Road 4 0.64 1.11 Yes
7 Live Oak Avenue Main Street to
Oakley Road 9 3.48 1.11 No
8 Live Oak Avenue
Oakley Road to
Neroly Road/Live
Oak Road
6 0.67 1.11 Yes
9 Neroly Road Main Street to
Oakley Road 3 0.57 1.11 Yes
10 Neroly Road Oakley Road to
Live Oak Avenue 0 0.00 1.11 Yes
11 Neroly Road Laurel Road to
Empire Avenue 2 0.30 1.11 Yes
12 Oakley Road Empire Avenue to
Live Oak Avenue 2 0.49 1.11 Yes
13 Oakley Road
Live Oak Avenue
to Western City
limits
3 0.73 1.11 Yes
14 O'Hara Avenue
West Cypress
Road to Laurel
Road
6 0.40 1.04 Yes
15 O'Hara Avenue Laurel Road to
Neroly Road 15 0.86 1.11 Yes
16 Rose Avenue
Laurel Road to
Simoni Ranch
Road
1 0.62 1.11 Yes
17 Sellers Avenue East Cypress Road
to Delta Road 5 0.33 1.11 Yes
81 0 0.5 1 2
Miles
1 ST

MAIN ST

SELLERS AVE

EMPIRE RD

E CYPRESS RD

EMPIRE AVE

OHARA AVE

LIVE OAK AVE

O'HARA AVE

BROWN RD
LARIAT
LN

ROSE AVE

OAKLEY RD

LAUREL RD

MALICOAT AVE DOYLE RD

TETON RD

FALL LN

BRIDGEHEAD RD

BIG BEAR RD

BIG BREA
K
R
D

FERNWOOD DR

NEROLY RD

OAKLEY RD

NEROLY RD

NEROLY RD

NEROLY RD

MAIN ST

LAUREL RD
1 ST

SELLERS AVE

MAIN ST MAIN ST

WILBUR AVE

E CYPRESS RD

E CYPRESS RD

LAUREL RD

MAIN ST

MAIN ST

SIMONI RANCH RD
Figure 5: Collision Analysis
Bridgehead Road - Main St. to Wilbur Ave.

Empire Avenue - Main St. to Laurel Rd.

Empire Avenue - Laurel Rd. to South City Limits
Laurel Road - O'Hara Ave. to Rose Ave.

Laurel Road - Rose Ave. to Main St.

Laurel Road - Main St. to Teton Rd.

Live Oak Avenue - Main St. to Oakley Rd.

Live Oak Avenue - Oakley Rd. to Neroly Rd.

Neroly Road - Main St. to Oakley Rd.

Neroly Road - Oakley Rd. to Live Oak Ave.

Neroly Road - Laurel Rd. to Empire Ave.

Oakley Road - Empire Ave. to Live Oak Ave.

Oakley Road - Live Oak Ave. to West City Limits
O'Hara Avenue - W. Cypress Rd. to Laurel Rd.

O'Hara Avenue - Laurel Rd. to Neroly Rd.

Rose Avenue - Laurel Rd. to Simoni Ranch Rd.

Sellers Avenue - E. Cypress Rd. to Delta Rd.

Study Segments
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 9
17 1
2 3
4 5 6
7 8
9 10
11 13 12
15 16 17
14 LEGEND
Roads
XX
XX Segment ID
City of Oakley
Collision Analysis
Collision Rate Below
Statewide Average
Collision Rate Above
Statewide Average
82 23 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY |

3.0 SPEED LIMIT RECOMMENDATIONS
The setting of speed limits requires a rational and defensible procedure to maintain the confidence of the public and legal systems. Speed limit determinations rely on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of drivers; one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective by measuring drivers' speeds.

The speed zoning section of the CA MUTCD was changed in 2004 to require rounding the 85th percentile to the nearest 5 mph increment rather than to the lower 5 mph increment in order to better conform to the standards established in the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA’s) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). This specific guideline revision resulted in raising certain street speed limits and had become a challenge to state and local jurisdictions.

In 2007, the California Traffic Control Devices Committee (CTCDC) ruled to approve a language change in the CA MUTCD to clarify how local speed limits should be set. Caltrans ultimately issued a Traffic Operations Policy Directive (No. 09-04), effective July 1, 2009, which clearly defined these changes and incorporated new requirements into the CA MUTCD. The changes are summarized below:
• Posted speed limits will be set "rounded to the nearest" 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed. • Jurisdictions can lower this speed by an additional 5 mph based on and justified by conditions and factors cited in the California Vehicle Code.

Studies of the effects of establishing, raising, and lowering speed limits include federal studies such as FHWARD-92-084 and FHWA-RD-98-154. These studies demonstrate that the most effective attribute in establishing the speed limit is to determine the 85th percentile speed and to set the posted speed close to that value. The empirical data in these studies demonstrates that setting the speed limit too high or too low can increase collisions. Speed limits that are set near the 85th percentile speed of free flowing traffic are safer and produce less variance in vehicle speeds. Because of this, the 85th percentile is used to establish the upper limit of operating speeds that are considered reasonable and prudent. In addition, setting the speed limit arbitrarily low often makes violators of a disproportionate number of drivers, does not facilitate the orderly movement of traffic, and requires constant enforcement to maintain compliance.

The 2014 Edition of the CA MUTCD requires as a standard that a speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, except that the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and CVC 22358.5.

According to CVC 21400, for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed if no further reduction is used. The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:
83 24 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY | • If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. The 35 mph established speed limit can be reduced by additional 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.
• If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. The 35 mph established speed limit can be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and are approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Section 2B.13 of the 2014 CA MUTCD further states that justification for reducing speed limits can be based on residential density, pedestrian/bicyclist safety and other factors not readily apparent to drivers but essential to meet the traffic safety needs of the community. The following factors may be considered to adjust and determine the final speed limits:
• Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance • 10 mph pace speed (a 10 mile range in which the highest number of data is recorded) • Roadside development and environment
• Parking practices and bicycle/pedestrian activity
• Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period On October 8, 2021, the procedure for establishing local speed limits was changed once again with Assembly Bill No. 43 (AB 43) being signed into law (and later clarified by Assembly Bill 1938 in 2022). Whereas the previous procedure required no further action be taken after rounding down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, AB 43 allows a local authority to use an additional 5 mph reduction if a portion of highway has been designated as a “safety corridor” as is defined by Caltrans in the CA MUTCD or if a portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, particularly those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused. The procedure is shown in Figure 6.

The existing speed limit may also be retained if it was established in a previous E&TS and if a registered traffic engineer has determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the portion of highway since completion of the previous E&TS.
84 25 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY | Figure 6: Illustration of Examples of Applicability of Rounding and Speed Limit Reductions on Local Agency Roadways
Source: 2014 CA MUTCD, Revision 7, Table 2B-104(CA)
The guidelines from the California Manual for Setting Speed Limits published by Caltrans (Rev. January 2024) were followed in this study. The speed limit recommendations are proposed for 17 street segments in the study based on the above discussed guidelines and speed data analysis. The speed limit for each study segment was recommended after determining the average speed, the 85th percentile speed, the pace speed, and considering other significant factors such as existing land use, roadway design characteristics and collision rates. The Appendix presents the recommended speed limit certifications of the traffic survey analyses, which include prevailing speed data, collision history, traffic factors, and roadway conditions. The recommended speed limit for each street segment is also shown with a comment on the rationale for the recommendation. Figure 7 illustrates the segments where speed limit changes are recommended. Figure 8 illustrates the recommended speed limits at the respective study segments.
30 35
40 45
50 55
85th-Percentile
"Critical Speed"
(mph)
Rounding to nearest
5 mph increment
(CVC 22358.6(a))
If rounding to
nearest is up, may
round down (CVC
22358.6(c))
If rounding to
nearest is down,
may additionally
lower by 5 mph
(CVC 22358.6(b))
If safety corridor or
adjacent to high
concentration of
bicyclists &
pedestrians, may
additionally lower
by 5 mph (CVC
22358.7)
Speed Limit
Condition of Rounding

47.5-50.0 mph 45.1-47.4 mph
Round down
initially
Round up
initially
85 26 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY | Table 9: Recommended Speed Limits Summary
No. Street Survey Limits
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Changes to
Existing Speed
Limit
(mph)
1 Bridgehead
Road
Main Street to
Wilbur Avenue 45 45 45 0
2 Empire Avenue Main Street to
Laurel Road 40 44 40 0
3 Empire Avenue
Laurel Road to
Southern City
limits
45 49 45 0
4 Laurel Road O'Hara Avenue
to Rose Avenue 40 44 40 0
5 Laurel Road Rose Avenue to
Main Street 40 40 40 0
6 Laurel Road Main Street to
Teton Road 35 41 35 0
7 Live Oak
Avenue
Main Street to
Oakley Road 35 41 35 0
8 Live Oak
Avenue
Oakley Road to
Neroly
Road/Live Oak
Road
40 43 40 0
9 Neroly Road Main Street to
Oakley Road 40 43 40 0
10 Neroly Road Oakley Road to
Live Oak Avenue 45 46 45 0
11 Neroly Road Laurel Road to
Empire Avenue 50 52 50 0
12 Oakley Road
Empire Avenue
to Live Oak
Avenue
35 40 35 0
13 Oakley Road
Live Oak Avenue
to Western City
limits
45 48 45 0
14 O'Hara Avenue
West Cypress
Road to Laurel
Road
35 40 35 0
15 O'Hara Avenue Laurel Road to
Neroly Road 40 46 40 0
16 Rose Avenue
Laurel Road to
Simoni Ranch
Road
40 42 40 0
17 Sellers Avenue
East Cypress
Road to Delta
Road
50 47 45 -5
86 0 0.5 1 2
Miles
1 ST

MAIN ST

SELLERS AVE

EMPIRE RD

E CYPRESS RD

EMPIRE AVE

OHARA AVE

LIVE OAK AVE

O'HARA AVE

BROWN RD
LARIAT
LN

ROSE AVE

OAKLEY RD

LAUREL RD

MALICOAT AVE DOYLE RD

TETON RD

FALL LN

BRIDGEHEAD RD

BIG BEAR RD

BIG BREA
K
R
D

FERNWOOD DR

NEROLY RD

OAKLEY RD

NEROLY RD

NEROLY RD

NEROLY RD

MAIN ST

LAUREL RD
1 ST

SELLERS AVE

MAIN ST MAIN ST

WILBUR AVE

E CYPRESS RD

E CYPRESS RD

LAUREL RD

MAIN ST

MAIN ST

SIMONI RANCH RD
Figure 7: Segment Speed Limit Changes
Bridgehead Road - Main St. to Wilbur Ave.

Empire Avenue - Main St. to Laurel Rd.

Empire Avenue - Laurel Rd. to South City Limits
Laurel Road - O'Hara Ave. to Rose Ave.

Laurel Road - Rose Ave. to Main St.

Laurel Road - Main St. to Teton Rd.

Live Oak Avenue - Main St. to Oakley Rd.

Live Oak Avenue - Oakley Rd. to Neroly Rd.

Neroly Road - Main St. to Oakley Rd.

Neroly Road - Oakley Rd. to Live Oak Ave.

Neroly Road - Laurel Rd. to Empire Ave.

Oakley Road - Empire Ave. to Live Oak Ave.

Oakley Road - Live Oak Ave. to West City Limits
O'Hara Avenue - W. Cypress Rd. to Laurel Rd.

O'Hara Avenue - Laurel Rd. to Neroly Rd.

Rose Avenue - Laurel Rd. to Simoni Ranch Rd.

Sellers Avenue - E. Cypress Rd. to Delta Rd.

Study Segments
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 9
17 17
LEGEND
Roads
Segment ID
City of Oakley
Speed Changes
XX
Reduced by 5 mph
87 1
2 3
4 5 6
7 8
9 10
11 13 12
14 15
16 17
0 0.5 1 2
Miles
1 ST

MAIN ST

SELLERS AVE

EMPIRE RD

E CYPRESS RD

EMPIRE AVE

OHARA AVE

LIVE OAK AVE

O'HARA AVE

BROWN RD
LARIAT
LN

ROSE AVE

OAKLEY RD

LAUREL RD

MALICOAT AVE DOYLE RD

TETON RD

FALL LN

BRIDGEHEAD RD

BIG BEAR RD

BIG BREA
K
R
D

FERNWOOD DR

NEROLY RD

OAKLEY RD

NEROLY RD

NEROLY RD

NEROLY RD

MAIN ST

LAUREL RD
1 ST

SELLERS AVE

MAIN ST MAIN ST

WILBUR AVE

E CYPRESS RD

E CYPRESS RD

LAUREL RD

MAIN ST

MAIN ST

SIMONI RANCH RD
Figure 8: Recommended Speed Limits
Bridgehead Road - Main St. to Wilbur Ave.

Empire Avenue - Main St. to Laurel Rd.

Empire Avenue - Laurel Rd. to South City Limits
Laurel Road - O'Hara Ave. to Rose Ave.

Laurel Road - Rose Ave. to Main St.

Laurel Road - Main St. to Teton Rd.

Live Oak Avenue - Main St. to Oakley Rd.

Live Oak Avenue - Oakley Rd. to Neroly Rd.

Neroly Road - Main St. to Oakley Rd.

Neroly Road - Oakley Rd. to Live Oak Ave.

Neroly Road - Laurel Rd. to Empire Ave.

Oakley Road - Empire Ave. to Live Oak Ave.

Oakley Road - Live Oak Ave. to West City Limits
O'Hara Avenue - W. Cypress Rd. to Laurel Rd.

O'Hara Avenue - Laurel Rd. to Neroly Rd.

Rose Avenue - Laurel Rd. to Simoni Ranch Rd.

Sellers Avenue - E. Cypress Rd. to Delta Rd.

Study Segments
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 9
17 0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
LEGEND
Roads
XX Segment ID
Recommended Speed Limits
35 mph
40 mph
City of Oakley
45 mph
50 mph
88 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY | CITY OF OAKLEY | A
APPENDIX – RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT CERTIFICATIONS

AND SUPPORTING DATA (SPEED SURVEY COLLECTION FORMS

AND AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES)
89 Segment #1
Street: Bridgehead Road
Limits: Main Street to Wilbur Avenue
Direction: NB/SB
Date /Location of Survey 4/5/2024
Posted Speed Limit (mph) 45
# Speed Data Collected 159
85th Percentile (mph) 45
10 mph Pace 34-43
Percent in Pace 74%
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 9,030
Length of Segment (mi.) 0.41
Street Classification Major Arterial
Date Range Covered Jan 1, 2018 - Dec 31, 2022
Total Accidents 4
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) 0.60
Statewide Average Accident Rate 1.11
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Approved and Authorized for release by the City of Oakley:

Signed:

Title:

Anna Vickroy, PE, TE
Existing Speed Limit: 45
Signed:

Title:

Mix of residential (mobile home park), commercial (hotel, gas stations, convenience stores, fast food establishments), industrial (junk yard, utility yard), and open space (agriculture and unused lot) land uses.

An undivided 2-lane major arterial. Double yellow lines serve as median. Concrete sidewalks present on easterly side and westerly side for approximately 375 feet and 576 feet north of Main Street, respectively. Class II bike lane on westerly side from approximately 247 feet north of Main Street to approximately 576 feet north of Main Street. Signal at intersection with Main St. Remaining side streets are stop controlled. Left-turn lane and right-turn lane pockets present on segment at intersection with Main St. Marked crosswalk present at intersection with Main St. No on-street parking present. No school zone is present. No horizontal curves present. Vertical curves present on approaches to railroad right-of-way. Roadway slopes positively in southerly direction. Low driveway density on both sides. Railroad underpass present approximately 1,350 feet north of Main St. §22358.6(a) - Round the speed limit to the nearest 5-mph increment from the 85th percentile speed: 45 --> 45 No
Recommended Speed Limit: 45
D. Roadway Conditions
Speed Limit Change?
C. Collision History
Senior Transportation Engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants Factors
A. Prevailing Speed Data
B. Traffic Factors
This survey conforms to Section 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic. 90 Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 1
28 1
29 3
30 2
31 1
32 2
33 1
34 6
35 10
36 11
37 12
38 12
39 15
40 12
41 15
42 7
43 17
44 6
45 7
46 7
47 3
48 3
49 1
50 2
51 1
52 53 1
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 159 27 - 53 40 mph 45 mph 34 - 43 117 74% 6% / 11 20% / 31

SPEED PARAMETERS
#1 - Bridgehead Rd Bet Main St & Wilbur Ave
City of Oakley
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:00
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-001
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
91 Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 1
30 2
31 1
32 33 1
34 3
35 5
36 3
37 4
38 7
39 5
40 6
41 8
42 2
43 5
44 3
45 4
46 3
47 1
48 3
49 1
50 2
51 1
52 53 1
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 72 29 - 53 40 mph 46 mph 34 - 43 48 67% 6% / 5 27% / 19

SPEED PARAMETERS
#1 - Bridgehead Rd Bet Main St & Wilbur Ave
City of Oakley
Northbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:00
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-001
0 2 4 6 8 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
92 Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 1
28 1
29 2
30 31
32 2
33 34 3
35 5
36 8
37 8
38 5
39 10
40 6
41 7
42 5
43 12
44 3
45 3
46 4
47 2
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 87 27 - 47 39 mph 43 mph 34 - 43 69 79% 6% / 6 14% / 12

SPEED PARAMETERS
#1 - Bridgehead Rd Bet Main St & Wilbur Ave
City of Oakley
Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:00
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-001
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
93 Day: Thursday City: Oakley
Date: Project #: CA24_080066_001
NB SB EB WB Total
4,441 4,589 0 0 9,030

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 42 6 12:00 62 86 148 00:00 01:00 23 31 54
0:15 35 8 12:15 61 51 112 01:00 02:00 12 19 31
0:30 6 15 21 12:30 65 76 141 02:00 03:00 23 17 40
0:45 10 9 19 12:45 77 73 150 03:00 04:00 28 21 49
1:00 17 8 13:00 73 67 140 04:00 05:00 73 90 163
1:15 44 8 13:15 66 74 140 05:00 06:00 136 72 208
1:30 16 7 13:30 76 66 142 06:00 07:00 233 125 358
1:45 62 8 13:45 73 65 138 07:00 08:00 262 191 453
2:00 54 9 14:00 68 90 158 08:00 09:00 300 262 562
2:15 25 7 14:15 71 75 146 09:00 10:00 230 194 424
2:30 95 14 14:30 73 80 153 10:00 11:00 254 237 491
2:45 73 10 14:45 80 92 172 11:00 12:00 257 262 519
3:00 65 11 15:00 79 105 184 12:00 13:00 265 286 551
3:15 73 10 15:15 74 90 164 13:00 14:00 288 272 560
3:30 57 12 15:30 93 100 193 14:00 15:00 292 337 629
3:45 10 6 16 15:45 83 106 189 15:00 16:00 329 401 730
4:00 14 18 32 16:00 71 108 179 16:00 17:00 335 430 765
4:15 14 11 25 16:15 98 101 199 17:00 18:00 308 387 695
4:30 20 40 60 16:30 93 99 192 18:00 19:00 277 346 623
4:45 25 21 46 16:45 73 122 195 19:00 20:00 208 250 458
5:00 25 18 43 17:00 74 91 165 20:00 21:00 113 136 249
5:15 34 16 50 17:15 65 95 160 21:00 22:00 102 103 205
5:30 32 23 55 17:30 73 105 178 22:00 23:00 68 72 140
5:45 45 15 60 17:45 96 96 192 23:00 00:00 25 48 73
6:00 45 33 78 18:00 89 97 186
6:15 49 18 67 18:15 79 96 175 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 68 37 105 18:30 63 72 135 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 71 37 108 18:45 46 81 127 1831 1521 3352
7:00 60 52 112 19:00 75 69 144 7:45 10:45 8:00
7:15 74 33 107 19:15 55 72 127 302 280 562
7:30 61 43 104 19:30 40 61 101 0.878 0.897 0.906
7:45 67 63 130 19:45 38 48 86
8:00 65 61 126 20:00 31 42 73 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 86 69 155 20:15 26 38 64 2610 3068 5678
8:30 84 52 136 20:30 31 28 59 15:30 16:00 16:00
8:45 65 80 145 20:45 25 28 53 345 430 765
9:00 64 46 110 21:00 23 27 50 0.880 0.881 0.961
9:15 52 47 99 21:15 22 21 43
9:30 58 49 107 21:30 25 24 49 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 56 52 108 21:45 32 31 63 562 453 1015
10:00 66 60 126 22:00 19 16 35 7:45 8:00 8:00
10:15 52 50 102 22:15 14 23 37 302 262 562
10:30 58 50 108 22:30 20 15 35 0.878 0.819 0.906
10:45 78 77 155 22:45 15 18 33
11:00 66 78 144 23:00 10 15 25 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 63 67 130 23:15 2 13 15 643 817 1460
11:30 63 58 121 23:30 7 13 20 16:15 16:00 16:00
11:45 65 59 124 23:45 67 13 338 430 765
TOTALS 1831 1521 0 0 3352 TOTALS 2610 3068 0 0 5678 0.862 0.881 0.961 SPLIT % 55% 45% 0% 0% 37% SPLIT % 46% 54% 0% 0% 63%
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
#1 ‐ Bridgehead Rd Bet Main St & Wilbur Ave
4/4/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB
94 Segment #2
Street: Empire Avenue
Limits: Main Street to Laurel Road
Direction: NB/SB
Date /Location of Survey 4/5/2024
Posted Speed Limit (mph) 40
# Speed Data Collected 130
85th Percentile (mph) 44
10 mph Pace 35-44
Percent in Pace 79%
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 20,428
Length of Segment (mi.) 1.08
Street Classification Major Arterial
Date Range Covered Jan 1, 2018 - Dec 31, 2022
Total Accidents 39
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) 0.97
Statewide Average Accident Rate 1.04
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Approved and Authorized for release by the City of Oakley:

Signed:

Title:

Signed: Anna Vickroy, PE, TE
Title: Senior Transportation Engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants §22358.6(a) - Round the speed limit to the nearest 5-mph increment from the 85th percentile speed: 44 --> 45 §22358.6(b) - Not applicable
§22358.6(c) - Lower the speed limit an additional 5 mph from the rounded speed limit if the speed limit was initially rounded up from the 85th percentile speed: 45 --> 40
Speed Limit Change? No
Existing Speed Limit: 40 Recommended Speed Limit: 40
C. Collision History
D. Roadway Conditions
Residential (single-family homes), commercial (mall), and open space land uses (park and agriculture).

A divided 4-lane major arterial. Raised median serves as median. Concrete sidewalks present on both sides except for portion of westerly side from Oakley Rd. to approximately 813 feet south of Oakley Rd. Class III sharrows present on both sides along full length of segment. Signals present at intersections with Main St., Oakley Rd., W. Cypress Rd., Gateway Dr., and Laurel Rd. Remaining intersections include side steet stop control. Left-turn lane pockets present along segment at all intersections. Right-turn lane pockets present along segment at all signalized intersections except at Gateway Dr. Marked crosswalks present at intersections with Main St., Oakley Rd., W. Cypress Rd., Truman Ln., Gateway Dr., and Laurel Rd. No on-street parking present. No school zone is present. Broad horizontal curves present at north end of segment. Gentle vertical curves all along segment. Segment slopes positively in southerly direction. Low driveway density on both sides for most of segment. North end of segment as medium driveway density on easterly side. Ped-bike trail present along canal at southern end of segment.

Factors
A. Prevailing Speed Data
B. Traffic Factors
This survey conforms to Section 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic. 95 Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 1
30 31 1
32 1
33 3
34 5
35 9
36 11
37 11
38 12
39 15
40 14
41 10
42 8
43 7
44 6
45 7
46 3
47 3
48 1
49 1
50 51
52 1
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 130 29 - 52 39 mph 44 mph 35 - 44 103 79% 8% / 11 13% / 16

SPEED PARAMETERS
#2 - Empire Ave Bet Laurel Rd & Main St
City of Oakley
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
12:15-13:00
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-002
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
96 Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 1
34 1
35 3
36 5
37 4
38 5
39 7
40 7
41 6
42 5
43 5
44 4
45 6
46 3
47 2
48 1
49 1
50 51
52 1
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 67 33 - 52 41 mph 45 mph 36 - 45 54 81% 7% / 5 12% / 8

SPEED PARAMETERS
#2 - Empire Ave Bet Laurel Rd & Main St
City of Oakley
Northbound Spot Speeds
12:15-13:00
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-002
02468
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
97 Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 1
30 31 1
32 1
33 2
34 4
35 6
36 6
37 7
38 7
39 8
40 7
41 4
42 3
43 2
44 2
45 1
46 47 1
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 63 29 - 47 38 mph 41 mph 33 - 42 54 86% 4% / 3 10% / 6

SPEED PARAMETERS
#2 - Empire Ave Bet Laurel Rd & Main St
City of Oakley
Southbound Spot Speeds
12:15-13:00
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-002
0 2 4 6 8 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
98 Day: Thursday City: Oakley
Date: Project #: CA24_080066_002
NB SB EB WB Total
9,726 10,702 0 0 20,428

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 27 16 43 12:00 154 156 310 00:00 01:00 68 45 113
0:15 15 8 23 12:15 159 150 309 01:00 02:00 29 29 58
0:30 16 15 31 12:30 165 143 308 02:00 03:00 20 34 54
0:45 10 6 16 12:45 136 161 297 03:00 04:00 31 104 135
1:00 11 3 14 13:00 144 153 297 04:00 05:00 38 300 338
1:15 7 13 20 13:15 171 163 334 05:00 06:00 49 400 449
1:30 59 14 13:30 151 191 342 06:00 07:00 101 496 597
1:45 64 10 13:45 173 137 310 07:00 08:00 295 690 985
2:00 66 12 14:00 168 164 332 08:00 09:00 566 969 1535
2:15 57 12 14:15 199 156 355 09:00 10:00 405 595 1000
2:30 4 10 14 14:30 172 170 342 10:00 11:00 429 601 1030 2:45 5 11 16 14:45 213 179 392 11:00 12:00 538 591 1129 3:00 6 20 26 15:00 164 194 358 12:00 13:00 614 610 1224 3:15 8 22 30 15:15 244 174 418 13:00 14:00 639 644 1283 3:30 9 25 34 15:30 310 200 510 14:00 15:00 752 669 1421 3:45 8 37 45 15:45 260 183 443 15:00 16:00 978 751 1729 4:00 9 36 45 16:00 225 157 382 16:00 17:00 891 676 1567 4:15 8 67 75 16:15 212 186 398 17:00 18:00 834 687 1521 4:30 9 95 104 16:30 244 171 415 18:00 19:00 774 596 1370 4:45 12 102 114 16:45 210 162 372 19:00 20:00 600 447 1047 5:00 9 109 118 17:00 217 185 402 20:00 21:00 462 314 776 5:15 11 91 102 17:15 203 178 381 21:00 22:00 314 258 572 5:30 10 91 101 17:30 200 155 355 22:00 23:00 180 129 309 5:45 19 109 128 17:45 214 169 383 23:00 00:00 119 67 186 6:00 21 123 144 18:00 220 159 379
6:15 15 119 134 18:15 225 142 367 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 25 122 147 18:30 163 149 312 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 40 132 172 18:45 166 146 312 2569 4854 7423
7:00 59 112 171 19:00 178 130 308 8:00 7:45 7:45
7:15 57 165 222 19:15 152 105 257 566 1032 1593
7:30 77 191 268 19:30 139 111 250 0.791 0.866 0.849
7:45 102 222 324 19:45 131 101 232
8:00 139 298 437 20:00 132 93 225 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 179 290 469 20:15 130 91 221 7157 5848 13005
8:30 141 222 363 20:30 106 81 187 15:15 15:00 15:15
8:45 107 159 266 20:45 94 49 143 1039 751 1753
9:00 93 143 236 21:00 87 75 162 0.838 0.939 0.859
9:15 86 144 230 21:15 90 74 164
9:30 106 166 272 21:30 79 62 141 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 120 142 262 21:45 58 47 105 861 1659 2520
10:00 106 152 258 22:00 63 44 107 8:00 7:45 7:45
10:15 108 171 279 22:15 46 32 78 566 1032 1593
10:30 110 125 235 22:30 37 30 67 0.791 0.866 0.849
10:45 105 153 258 22:45 34 23 57
11:00 132 154 286 23:00 43 24 67 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 126 148 274 23:15 18 17 35 1725 1363 3088
11:30 140 141 281 23:30 28 11 39 16:00 16:15 16:15
11:45 140 148 288 23:45 30 15 45 891 704 1587
TOTALS 2569 4854 0 0 7423 TOTALS 7157 5848 0 0 13005 0.913 0.946 0.956 SPLIT % 35% 65% 0% 0% 36% SPLIT % 55% 45% 0% 0% 64%
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
#2 ‐ Empire Ave Bet Laurel Rd & Main St
4/4/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
0 200
400
600
800
1000
1200
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB
99 Segment #3
Street: Empire Avenue
Limits: Laurel Road to Southern City limits
Direction: NB/SB
Date /Location of Survey 4/5/2024
Posted Speed Limit (mph) 45
# Speed Data Collected 202
85th Percentile (mph) 49
10 mph Pace 37-46
Percent in Pace 66%
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 14,717
Length of Segment (mi.) 0.82
Street Classification Major Arterial
Date Range Covered Jan 1, 2018 - Dec 31, 2022
Total Accidents 5
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) 0.23
Statewide Average Accident Rate 1.04
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Approved and Authorized for release by the City of Oakley:

Signed:

Title:

Signed: Anna Vickroy, PE, TE
Title: Senior Transportation Engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants §22358.6(a) - Round the speed limit to the nearest 5-mph increment from the 85th percentile speed: 49 --> 50 §22358.6(b) - Not applicable
§22358.6(c) - Lower the speed limit an additional 5 mph from the rounded speed limit if the speed limit was initially rounded up from the 85th percentile speed: 50 --> 45
Speed Limit Change? No
Existing Speed Limit: 45 Recommended Speed Limit: 45
C. Collision History
D. Roadway Conditions
Residential (single-family homes), commercial (gas station and convenience store), industrial, (utilities), recreation (fitness center), and open space (agriculture) land uses.

A divided 4-lane major arterial. Raised median serves as median. Concrete sidewalks present on easterly side for length of segment and on westerly side from Laurel Rd. to approximately 291 feet south of Laurel Rd. Class II bike lanes on both sides from Laurel Rd. to Neroly Rd. Class II bike lane on easterly side from Neroly Rd. to railroad right-of-way. Signals present at intersections with Laurel Rd., Carpenter Rd., and Neroly Rd. Remaining intersections include side steet stop control. Left-turn lane pockets present along segment at approximately all intersections. Right-turn lane pocket present at intersection with Neroly Rd. Marked crosswalks present at virtually all intersections. No on-street parking present. No school zone is present. Horizontal curves present at south end of segment at at-grade railroad crossing. Gentle vertical curves present along segment. Low driveway density on both sides.

Factors
A. Prevailing Speed Data
B. Traffic Factors
This survey conforms to Section 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic. 100
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 1
34 3
35 4
36 9
37 12
38 9
39 12
40 10
41 13
42 13
43 17
44 15
45 18
46 14
47 11
48 10
49 11
50 8
51 4
52 5
53 1
54 2
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 202 33 - 54 43 mph 49 mph 37 - 46 133 66% 8% / 17 26% / 52

SPEED PARAMETERS
#3 - Empire Ave Bet Laurel Rd & Southern City Limits
City of Oakley
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:00
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-003
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
101
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34 1
35 1
36 4
37 6
38 5
39 6
40 5
41 6
42 7
43 8
44 7
45 11
46 8
47 6
48 5
49 7
50 5
51 1
52 1
53 54 1
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 101 34 - 54 44 mph 48 mph 40 - 49 70 69% 22% / 23 8% / 8

SPEED PARAMETERS
#3 - Empire Ave Bet Laurel Rd & Southern City Limits
City of Oakley
Northbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:00
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-003
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
102
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 1
34 2
35 3
36 5
37 6
38 4
39 6
40 5
41 7
42 6
43 9
44 8
45 7
46 6
47 5
48 5
49 4
50 3
51 3
52 4
53 1
54 1
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 101 33 - 54 43 mph 49 mph 37 - 46 64 63% 10% / 11 26% / 26

SPEED PARAMETERS
#3 - Empire Ave Bet Laurel Rd & Southern City Limits
City of Oakley
Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:00
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-003
0 2 4 6 8 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
103
Day: Thursday City: Oakley
Date: Project #: CA24_080066_003
NB SB EB WB Total
6,701 8,016 0 0 14,717

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 12 14 26 12:00 109 113 222 00:00 01:00 27 47 74
0:15 2 13 15 12:15 112 126 238 01:00 02:00 13 16 29
0:30 10 12 22 12:30 92 125 217 02:00 03:00 8 21 29
0:45 38 11 12:45 97 119 216 03:00 04:00 35 30 65
1:00 70 7 13:00 91 135 226 04:00 05:00 97 54 151
1:15 15 6 13:15 109 132 241 05:00 06:00 120 64 184
1:30 47 11 13:30 112 135 247 06:00 07:00 154 116 270
1:45 14 5 13:45 111 137 248 07:00 08:00 227 303 530
2:00 37 10 14:00 120 169 289 08:00 09:00 494 626 1120
2:15 20 2 14:15 110 128 238 09:00 10:00 279 359 638
2:30 35 8 14:30 100 144 244 10:00 11:00 342 415 757
2:45 09 9 14:45 126 174 300 11:00 12:00 395 439 834
3:00 95 14 15:00 110 205 315 12:00 13:00 410 483 893
3:15 76 13 15:15 143 209 352 13:00 14:00 423 539 962
3:30 10 10 20 15:30 231 166 397 14:00 15:00 456 615 1071 3:45 99 18 15:45 174 202 376 15:00 16:00 658 782 1440
4:00 11 11 22 16:00 138 152 290 16:00 17:00 534 671 1205 4:15 16 9 25 16:15 150 186 336 17:00 18:00 520 712 1232 4:30 37 20 57 16:30 120 165 285 18:00 19:00 479 605 1084 4:45 33 14 47 16:45 126 168 294 19:00 20:00 387 440 827 5:00 20 15 35 17:00 143 175 318 20:00 21:00 272 299 571 5:15 25 16 41 17:15 109 194 303 21:00 22:00 224 201 425 5:30 34 14 48 17:30 123 156 279 22:00 23:00 100 112 212 5:45 41 19 60 17:45 145 187 332 23:00 00:00 47 67 114
6:00 41 22 63 18:00 136 172 308
6:15 34 24 58 18:15 127 149 276 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 37 32 69 18:30 113 142 255 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 42 38 80 18:45 103 142 245 2191 2490 4681
7:00 43 41 84 19:00 107 142 249 8:00 7:45 7:45
7:15 44 64 108 19:15 108 106 214 494 637 1122
7:30 62 88 150 19:30 84 99 183 0.753 0.751 0.797
7:45 78 110 188 19:45 88 93 181
8:00 85 212 297 20:00 82 92 174 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 158 194 352 20:15 72 75 147 4510 5526 10036
8:30 164 121 285 20:30 69 78 147 15:30 15:00 15:00
8:45 87 99 186 20:45 49 54 103 693 782 1440
9:00 76 88 164 21:00 54 63 117 0.750 0.935 0.907
9:15 60 78 138 21:15 79 43 122
9:30 72 97 169 21:30 50 59 109 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 71 96 167 21:45 41 36 77 721 929 1650
10:00 81 98 179 22:00 36 39 75 8:00 7:45 7:45
10:15 89 105 194 22:15 29 33 62 494 637 1122
10:30 81 89 170 22:30 22 19 41 0.753 0.751 0.797
10:45 91 123 214 22:45 13 21 34
11:00 104 103 207 23:00 11 26 37 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 88 117 205 23:15 11 20 31 1054 1383 2437
11:30 93 107 200 23:30 12 6 18 16:15 17:00 16:15
11:45 110 112 222 23:45 13 15 28 539 712 1233
TOTALS 2191 2490 0 0 4681 TOTALS 4510 5526 0 0 10036 0.898 0.918 0.917 SPLIT % 47% 53% 0% 0% 32% SPLIT % 45% 55% 0% 0% 68%
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
#3 ‐ Empire Ave Bet Laurel Rd & Southern City Limits
4/4/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB
104
Segment #4
Street: Laurel Road
Limits: O'Hara Avenue to Rose Avenue
Direction: EB/WB
Date /Location of Survey 4/4/2024
Posted Speed Limit (mph) 40
# Speed Data Collected 156
85th Percentile (mph) 44
10 mph Pace 36-45
Percent in Pace 90%
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 20,052
Length of Segment (mi.) 0.49
Street Classification Major Arterial
Date Range Covered Jan 1, 2018 - Dec 31, 2022
Total Accidents 15
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) 0.83
Statewide Average Accident Rate 1.04
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Approved and Authorized for release by the City of Oakley:

Signed:

Title:

Signed: Anna Vickroy, PE, TE
Title: Senior Transportation Engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants §22358.6(a) - Round the speed limit to the nearest 5-mph increment from the 85th percentile speed: 44 --> 45 §22358.6(b) - Not applicable
§22358.6(c) - Lower the speed limit an additional 5 mph from the rounded speed limit if the speed limit was initially rounded up from the 85th percentile speed: 45 --> 40
Speed Limit Change? No
Existing Speed Limit: 40 Recommended Speed Limit: 40
C. Collision History
D. Roadway Conditions
Residential (single-family homes), and open space (park, agriculture, vacant plot) land uses.

A divided 4-lane major arterial. Raised median serves as median. Concrete sidewalks present on both sides except for portion of southerly side from O'Hara Ave. to approximately 1,241 feet east of O'Hara Ave. Class II bike lane on northerly side for length of segment and on southerly side from Rose Ave. to approximately 705 feet west of Rose Ave. Signals present at intersections with Rose Ave. and O'Hara Ave. Side street stop control at Cloverbrook Ave./Y St. Left-turn lane pockets at all intersection approaches on segment. Marked crosswalks present at virtually all intersections. No on-street parking present. No school zone is present. No horizontal curves present. Gentle vertical curves along segment. Low driveway density on both sides.

Factors
A. Prevailing Speed Data
B. Traffic Factors
This survey conforms to Section 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic. 105
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32 3
33 1
34 2
35 5
36 4
37 11
38 7
39 14
40 11
41 18
42 21
43 21
44 19
45 14
46 3
47 1
48 1
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 156 32 - 48 42 mph 44 mph 36 - 45 140 90% 7% / 11 4% / 5

SPEED PARAMETERS
#4 - Laurel Rd Bet O'Hara Ave & Rose Ave
City of Oakley
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
13:10-13:55
4/4/2024
Project #: 24-080067-004
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
106
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32 1
33 1
34 2
35 5
36 37 3
38 5
39 6
40 41 3
42 8
43 16
44 14
45 12
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 76 32 - 45 43 mph 45 mph 36 - 45 67 88% 11% / 9 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
#4 - Laurel Rd Bet O'Hara Ave & Rose Ave
City of Oakley
Eastbound Spot Speeds
13:10-13:55
4/4/2024
Project #: 24-080067-004
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
107
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32 2
33 34
35 36 4
37 8
38 2
39 8
40 11
41 15
42 13
43 5
44 5
45 2
46 3
47 1
48 1
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 80 32 - 48 41 mph 43 mph 36 - 45 73 91% 2% / 2 7% / 5

SPEED PARAMETERS
#4 - Laurel Rd Bet O'Hara Ave & Rose Ave
City of Oakley
Westbound Spot Speeds
13:10-13:55
4/4/2024
Project #: 24-080067-004
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
108
Day: Thursday City: Oakley
Date: Project #: CA24_080066_004
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 9,620 10,432 20,052

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 44 6 50 12:00 112 128 240 00:00 01:00 131 32 163
0:15 32 9 41 12:15 118 104 222 01:00 02:00 56 31 87
0:30 21 10 31 12:30 133 115 248 02:00 03:00 33 49 82
0:45 34 7 41 12:45 144 136 280 03:00 04:00 25 119 144
1:00 16 11 27 13:00 142 129 271 04:00 05:00 43 407 450
1:15 22 4 26 13:15 131 133 264 05:00 06:00 87 598 685
1:30 98 17 13:30 125 138 263 06:00 07:00 162 637 799
1:45 98 17 13:45 172 119 291 07:00 08:00 346 767 1113
2:00 11 10 21 14:00 182 152 334 08:00 09:00 540 925 1465 2:15 7 10 17 14:15 153 154 307 09:00 10:00 356 631 987
2:30 10 16 26 14:30 161 153 314 10:00 11:00 355 489 844 2:45 5 13 18 14:45 204 155 359 11:00 12:00 438 494 932
3:00 5 12 17 15:00 154 180 334 12:00 13:00 507 483 990
3:15 9 33 42 15:15 229 189 418 13:00 14:00 570 519 1089 3:30 6 32 38 15:30 276 199 475 14:00 15:00 700 614 1314 3:45 5 42 47 15:45 231 175 406 15:00 16:00 890 743 1633 4:00 8 67 75 16:00 205 174 379 16:00 17:00 853 653 1506 4:15 7 95 102 16:15 226 135 361 17:00 18:00 919 608 1527 4:30 11 113 124 16:30 234 184 418 18:00 19:00 744 532 1276 4:45 17 132 149 16:45 188 160 348 19:00 20:00 593 442 1035 5:00 19 164 183 17:00 228 167 395 20:00 21:00 510 299 809 5:15 26 124 150 17:15 242 125 367 21:00 22:00 361 178 539 5:30 23 160 183 17:30 209 166 375 22:00 23:00 251 116 367 5:45 19 150 169 17:45 240 150 390 23:00 00:00 150 66 216 6:00 39 166 205 18:00 219 139 358
6:15 42 144 186 18:15 194 136 330 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 39 180 219 18:30 178 147 325 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 42 147 189 18:45 153 110 263 2572 5179 7751
7:00 53 140 193 19:00 167 109 276 8:00 7:45 7:45
7:15 81 188 269 19:15 141 108 249 540 977 1516
7:30 104 198 302 19:30 126 96 222 0.839 0.905 0.896
7:45 108 241 349 19:45 159 129 288
8:00 131 270 401 20:00 123 84 207 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 161 262 423 20:15 141 62 203 7048 5253 12301
8:30 139 204 343 20:30 132 77 209 15:15 15:00 15:15
8:45 109 189 298 20:45 114 76 190 941 743 1678
9:00 96 158 254 21:00 103 50 153 0.852 0.933 0.883
9:15 88 159 247 21:15 94 43 137
9:30 79 160 239 21:30 89 50 139 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 93 154 247 21:45 75 35 110 886 1692 2578
10:00 88 121 209 22:00 66 30 96 8:00 7:45 7:45
10:15 97 120 217 22:15 61 33 94 540 977 1516
10:30 83 135 218 22:30 68 31 99 0.839 0.905 0.896
10:45 87 113 200 22:45 56 22 78
11:00 118 117 235 23:00 42 24 66 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 103 138 241 23:15 31 17 48 1772 1261 3033
11:30 120 115 235 23:30 38 14 52 17:00 16:00 16:30
11:45 97 124 221 23:45 39 11 50 919 653 1528
TOTALS 0 0 2572 5179 7751 TOTALS 0 0 7048 5253 12301 0.949 0.887 0.914 SPLIT % 0% 0% 33% 67% 39% SPLIT % 0% 0% 57% 43% 61%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
#4 ‐ Laurel Rd Bet O'Hara Ave & Rose Ave
4/4/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB
109
Segment #5
Street: Laurel Road
Limits: Rose Avenue to Main Street
Direction: EB/WB
Date /Location of Survey 4/9/2024
Posted Speed Limit (mph) 40
# Speed Data Collected 112
85th Percentile (mph) 40
10 mph Pace 32-41
Percent in Pace 87%
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 15,792
Length of Segment (mi.) 0.50
Street Classification Major Arterial
Date Range Covered Jan 1, 2018 - Dec 31, 2022
Total Accidents 9
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) 0.63
Statewide Average Accident Rate 1.04
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Approved and Authorized for release by the City of Oakley:

Signed:

Title:

Signed: Anna Vickroy, PE, TE
Title: Senior Transportation Engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants §22358.6(a) - Round the speed limit to the nearest 5-mph increment from the 85th percentile speed: 40 --> 40 Speed Limit Change? No
Existing Speed Limit: 40 Recommended Speed Limit: 40
C. Collision History
D. Roadway Conditions
Residential (single-family homes), and open space (agriculture, vacant plot) land uses.

A divided 4-lane major arterial. Raised median serves as median. Concrete sidewalks on both sides for length of segment. Class II bike lanes on both sides for length of segment. Signals present at intersections with Rose Ave. and Main St. Side street stop control present at remaining intersections. Left-turn lane pockets at all intersection approaches on segment. Right-turn lane pocket at Main St. intersection approach on segment. Marked crosswalks present at virtually all intersections. No on-street parking present. No school zone is present. No horizontal curves present. Gentle vertical curves along segment. Low driveway density on both sides.

Factors
A. Prevailing Speed Data
B. Traffic Factors
This survey conforms to Section 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic. 110
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 1
30 2
31 4
32 9
33 9
34 7
35 14
36 7
37 11
38 13
39 13
40 6
41 8
42 1
43 3
44 2
45 2
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 112 29 - 45 37 mph 40 mph 32 - 41 97 87% 6% / 7 8% / 8

SPEED PARAMETERS
#5 - Laurel Rd Bet Rose Ave & Main St
City of Oakley
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:15-10:15
4/9/2024
Project #: 24-080067-005
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
111
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 1
30 2
31 3
32 6
33 5
34 3
35 6
36 2
37 7
38 7
39 6
40 3
41 42 1
43 44 1
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 53 29 - 44 36 mph 39 mph 31 - 40 48 91% 5% / 3 4% / 2

SPEED PARAMETERS
#5 - Laurel Rd Bet Rose Ave & Main St
City of Oakley
Eastbound Spot Speeds
09:15-10:15
4/9/2024
Project #: 24-080067-005
02468
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
112
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 1
32 3
33 4
34 4
35 8
36 5
37 4
38 6
39 7
40 3
41 8
42 43 3
44 1
45 2
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 59 31 - 45 38 mph 41 mph 32 - 41 52 88% 1% / 1 11% / 6

SPEED PARAMETERS
#5 - Laurel Rd Bet Rose Ave & Main St
City of Oakley
Westbound Spot Speeds
09:15-10:15
4/9/2024
Project #: 24-080067-005
0 2 4 6 8 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
113
Day: Thursday City: Oakley
Date: Project #: CA24_080066_005
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 7,855 7,937 15,792

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 41 3 44 12:00 92 96 188 00:00 01:00 104 24 128
0:15 27 8 35 12:15 110 74 184 01:00 02:00 44 19 63
0:30 16 8 24 12:30 104 97 201 02:00 03:00 32 35 67
0:45 20 5 25 12:45 103 100 203 03:00 04:00 22 90 112
1:00 16 6 22 13:00 98 93 191 04:00 05:00 36 289 325
1:15 15 3 18 13:15 111 104 215 05:00 06:00 74 434 508
1:30 86 14 13:30 105 113 218 06:00 07:00 159 477 636
1:45 54 9 13:45 138 98 236 07:00 08:00 283 608 891
2:00 11 7 18 14:00 147 115 262 08:00 09:00 518 687 1205 2:15 67 13 14:15 128 134 262 09:00 10:00 299 466 765
2:30 9 11 20 14:30 126 123 249 10:00 11:00 277 352 629
2:45 6 10 16 14:45 170 141 311 11:00 12:00 361 390 751
3:00 56 11 15:00 141 151 292 12:00 13:00 409 367 776
3:15 7 25 32 15:15 161 136 297 13:00 14:00 452 408 860
3:30 7 26 33 15:30 203 141 344 14:00 15:00 571 513 1084 3:45 3 33 36 15:45 198 164 362 15:00 16:00 703 592 1295 4:00 6 49 55 16:00 160 145 305 16:00 17:00 675 507 1182 4:15 5 59 64 16:15 161 102 263 17:00 18:00 733 486 1219 4:30 9 83 92 16:30 178 133 311 18:00 19:00 571 436 1007 4:45 16 98 114 16:45 176 127 303 19:00 20:00 482 316 798 5:00 11 119 130 17:00 163 132 295 20:00 21:00 411 215 626 5:15 27 85 112 17:15 175 116 291 21:00 22:00 304 119 423 5:30 19 118 137 17:30 194 117 311 22:00 23:00 217 66 283 5:45 17 112 129 17:45 201 121 322 23:00 00:00 118 41 159 6:00 42 118 160 18:00 152 107 259
6:15 31 99 130 18:15 166 117 283 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 42 131 173 18:30 153 121 274 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 44 129 173 18:45 100 91 191 2209 3871 6080
7:00 37 111 148 19:00 124 95 219 8:00 7:45 7:45
7:15 52 150 202 19:15 125 77 202 518 758 1275
7:30 99 148 247 19:30 111 76 187 0.875 0.831 0.871
7:45 95 199 294 19:45 122 68 190
8:00 138 228 366 20:00 106 56 162 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 148 182 330 20:15 120 57 177 5646 4066 9712
8:30 136 149 285 20:30 107 54 161 17:00 15:00 15:15
8:45 96 128 224 20:45 78 48 126 733 592 1308
9:00 80 132 212 21:00 95 34 129 0.912 0.902 0.903
9:15 76 118 194 21:15 76 36 112
9:30 81 109 190 21:30 68 28 96 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 62 107 169 21:45 65 21 86 801 1295 2096
10:00 61 83 144 22:00 64 27 91 8:00 7:45 7:45
10:15 84 92 176 22:15 48 18 66 518 758 1275
10:30 72 92 164 22:30 54 12 66 0.875 0.831 0.871
10:45 60 85 145 22:45 51 9 60
11:00 88 98 186 23:00 32 17 49 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 93 92 185 23:15 26 9 35 1408 993 2401
11:30 87 91 178 23:30 32 9 41 17:00 16:30 17:00
11:45 93 109 202 23:45 28 6 34 733 508 1219
TOTALS 0 0 2209 3871 6080 TOTALS 0 0 5646 4066 9712 0.912 0.955 0.946 SPLIT % 0% 0% 36% 64% 39% SPLIT % 0% 0% 58% 42% 61%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
#5 ‐ Laurel Rd Bet Rose Ave & Main St
4/4/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB
114
Segment #6
Street: Laurel Road
Limits: Main Street to Teton Road
Direction: EB/WB
Date /Location of Survey 4/9/2024
Posted Speed Limit (mph) 35
# Speed Data Collected 118
85th Percentile (mph) 41
10 mph Pace 30-39
Percent in Pace 69%
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 6,876
Length of Segment (mi.) 0.50
Street Classification Major Arterial
Date Range Covered Jan 1, 2018 - Dec 31, 2022
Total Accidents 4
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) 0.64
Statewide Average Accident Rate 1.11
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Approved and Authorized for release by the City of Oakley:

Signed:

Title:

Signed: Anna Vickroy, PE, TE
Title: Senior Transportation Engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants §22358.6(a) - Round the speed limit to the nearest 5-mph increment from the 85th percentile speed: 41 --> 40 §22358.6(b) - Lower the speed limit an additional 5 mph from the rounded speed limit if the speed limit was initially rounded down from the 85th percentile speed: 40 --> 35
Speed Limit Change? No
Existing Speed Limit: 35 Recommended Speed Limit: 35
C. Collision History
D. Roadway Conditions
Residential (single-family homes), and open space (vacant plot) land uses.

An undivided 2-lane major arterial. Double yellow lines serve as median. Concrete sidewalk on northerly side from Teton Rd. to Marsh Creek Bridge. Concrete sidewalk on southerly side along length of segment except between Creekside Wy. and Marsh Creek Bridge.

No bicycle facilities present along segment. Signal present at intersection with Main St. Side street stop control at remaining intersections. Left-turn lane pockets at intersection approaches to Quail Valley Run and to Main St. Marked crosswalks present at intersections with Main St. and at Marsh Creek Regional Trail approximately 115 feet west of intersection with Quail Valley Run. Onstreet parking present on southerly side from Marsh Creek Regional Trail to Teton Rd. No school zone is present. No horizontal curves present. Sharp vertical curves at Marsh Creek Regional Trail crossing. Low driveway density on both sides.

Factors
A. Prevailing Speed Data
B. Traffic Factors
This survey conforms to Section 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic. 115
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 1
27 28 5
29 4
30 5
31 11
32 7
33 12
34 7
35 7
36 7
37 8
38 8
39 10
40 3
41 12
42 4
43 3
44 1
45 1
46 2
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 118 26 - 46 35 mph 41 mph 30 - 39 82 69% 8% / 10 23% / 26

SPEED PARAMETERS
#6 - Laurel Rd Bet Main St & Teton Rd
City of Oakley
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:20-11:20
4/9/2024
Project #: 24-080067-006
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
116
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 1
27 28 2
29 2
30 1
31 5
32 3
33 2
34 5
35 3
36 5
37 2
38 4
39 8
40 3
41 7
42 43 3
44 1
45 46 1
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 58 26 - 46 36 mph 41 mph 32 - 41 42 72% 18% / 11 9% / 5

SPEED PARAMETERS
#6 - Laurel Rd Bet Main St & Teton Rd
City of Oakley
Eastbound Spot Speeds
10:20-11:20
4/9/2024
Project #: 24-080067-006
0 2 4 6 8 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
117
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 3
29 2
30 4
31 6
32 4
33 10
34 2
35 4
36 2
37 6
38 4
39 2
40 41 5
42 4
43 44
45 1
46 1
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 60 28 - 46 34 mph 41 mph 29 - 38 44 73% 5% / 3 22% / 13

SPEED PARAMETERS
#6 - Laurel Rd Bet Main St & Teton Rd
City of Oakley
Westbound Spot Speeds
10:20-11:20
4/9/2024
Project #: 24-080067-006
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
118
Day: Thursday City: Oakley
Date: Project #: CA24_080066_006
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 3,455 3,421 6,876

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 16 7 23 12:00 55 34 89 00:00 01:00 34 14 48
0:15 82 10 12:15 42 43 85 01:00 02:00 14 11 25
0:30 54 9 12:30 46 50 96 02:00 03:00 96 15
0:45 51 6 12:45 54 39 93 03:00 04:00 7 38 45
1:00 34 7 13:00 43 45 88 04:00 05:00 12 78 90
1:15 63 9 13:15 55 40 95 05:00 06:00 17 137 154
1:30 43 7 13:30 69 42 111 06:00 07:00 40 177 217
1:45 11 2 13:45 46 44 90 07:00 08:00 73 291 364
2:00 11 2 14:00 55 53 108 08:00 09:00 228 353 581
2:15 21 3 14:15 52 48 100 09:00 10:00 125 187 312
2:30 23 5 14:30 78 58 136 10:00 11:00 106 165 271
2:45 41 5 14:45 72 67 139 11:00 12:00 154 181 335
3:00 23 5 15:00 66 86 152 12:00 13:00 197 166 363
3:15 2 11 13 15:15 89 69 158 13:00 14:00 213 171 384
3:30 2 10 12 15:30 125 77 202 14:00 15:00 257 226 483
3:45 1 14 15 15:45 88 51 139 15:00 16:00 368 283 651
4:00 39 12 16:00 88 67 155 16:00 17:00 333 205 538
4:15 1 17 18 16:15 81 44 125 17:00 18:00 346 208 554
4:30 3 18 21 16:30 83 49 132 18:00 19:00 296 174 470
4:45 5 34 39 16:45 81 45 126 19:00 20:00 214 129 343
5:00 2 42 44 17:00 82 44 126 20:00 21:00 179 101 280
5:15 4 24 28 17:15 74 53 127 21:00 22:00 115 56 171
5:30 6 33 39 17:30 86 61 147 22:00 23:00 77 37 114
5:45 5 38 43 17:45 104 50 154 23:00 00:00 41 27 68
6:00 8 51 59 18:00 73 54 127
6:15 8 36 44 18:15 83 44 127 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 12 45 57 18:30 78 40 118 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 12 45 57 18:45 62 36 98 819 1638 2457
7:00 10 41 51 19:00 62 39 101 8:00 7:30 7:45
7:15 13 64 77 19:15 63 39 102 228 423 617
7:30 18 88 106 19:30 46 28 74 0.781 0.724 0.799
7:45 32 98 130 19:45 43 23 66
8:00 47 146 193 20:00 49 29 78 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 73 91 164 20:15 37 26 63 2636 1783 4419
8:30 71 59 130 20:30 53 17 70 15:15 14:45 15:15
8:45 37 57 94 20:45 40 29 69 390 299 654
9:00 34 52 86 21:00 28 14 42 0.780 0.869 0.809
9:15 35 44 79 21:15 24 16 40
9:30 35 47 82 21:30 35 14 49 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 21 44 65 21:45 28 12 40 301 644 945
10:00 23 30 53 22:00 26 14 40 8:00 7:30 7:45
10:15 29 44 73 22:15 15 8 23 228 423 617
10:30 31 58 89 22:30 21 8 29 0.781 0.724 0.799
10:45 23 33 56 22:45 15 7 22
11:00 30 37 67 23:00 14 10 24 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 43 43 86 23:15 96 15 679 413 1092
11:30 43 54 97 23:30 11 10 21 17:00 17:00 17:00
11:45 38 47 85 23:45 71 8 346 208 554
TOTALS 0 0 819 1638 2457 TOTALS 0 0 2636 1783 4419 0.832 0.852 0.899 SPLIT % 0% 0% 33% 67% 36% SPLIT % 0% 0% 60% 40% 64%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
#6 ‐ Laurel Rd Bet Main St & Teton Rd
4/4/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB
119
Segment #7
Street: Live Oak Avenue
Limits: Main Street to Oakley Road
Direction: NB/SB
Date /Location of Survey 4/5/2024
Posted Speed Limit (mph) 35
# Speed Data Collected 138
85th Percentile (mph) 41
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percent in Pace 64%
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,833
Length of Segment (mi.) 0.50
Street Classification Major Arterial
Date Range Covered Jan 1, 2018 - Dec 31, 2022
Total Accidents 9
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) 3.48
Statewide Average Accident Rate 1.11
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Approved and Authorized for release by the City of Oakley:

Signed:

Title:

Signed: Anna Vickroy, PE, TE
Title: Senior Transportation Engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants §22358.6(a) - Round the speed limit to the nearest 5-mph increment from the 85th percentile speed: 41 --> 40 §22358.6(b) - Lower the speed limit an additional 5 mph from the rounded speed limit if the speed limit was initially rounded down from the 85th percentile speed: 40 --> 35
Speed Limit Change? No
Existing Speed Limit: 35 Recommended Speed Limit: 35
C. Collision History
D. Roadway Conditions
Residential (single-family homes), industrial (distribution facility, construction yard, storage yards), and open space (agriculture) land uses.

An undivided 2-lane major arterial. Double yellow lines, single striped yellow line, and two-way left-turn lane serve as medians.

Concrete sidewalks present on easterly side in front of Orchard Park School and UPS Brentwood Center. No bicycle facilities present along segment. Signal present at intersection with Main St. All-way stop control at Oakley Rd. Left-turn and right-turn lane pockets present at approach to intersection with Main St. Marked crosswalk present at intersection with Main St. On-street parking present on easterly side in front of Orchard Park School and UPS Brentwood Center. School zone is present. No horizontal curves present. Gentle vertical curves along segment. Medium driveway density on both sides. Two-way left-turn lane in front of Orchard Park School.

Factors
A. Prevailing Speed Data
B. Traffic Factors
This survey conforms to Section 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic. 120
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 4
26 2
27 2
28 4
29 11
30 11
31 3
32 7
33 9
34 8
35 12
36 9
37 11
38 7
39 8
40 8
41 9
42 3
43 3
44 1
45 46 1
47 1
48 2
49 50 1
51 1
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 138 25 - 51 35 mph 41 mph 29 - 38 88 64% 8% / 12 28% / 38

SPEED PARAMETERS
#7 - Live Oak Ave Bet Oakley Rd & Main Ave
City of Oakley
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:10-11:35
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-007
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
121
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 2
26 1
27 2
28 2
29 7
30 6
31 1
32 2
33 3
34 3
35 5
36 5
37 6
38 1
39 4
40 5
41 7
42 3
43 3
44 1
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 69 25 - 44 36 mph 41 mph 33 - 42 42 61% 33% / 23 6% / 4

SPEED PARAMETERS
#7 - Live Oak Ave Bet Oakley Rd & Main Ave
City of Oakley
Northbound Spot Speeds
10:10-11:35
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-007
02468
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
122
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 2
26 1
27 28 2
29 4
30 5
31 2
32 5
33 6
34 5
35 7
36 4
37 5
38 6
39 4
40 3
41 2
42 43
44 45
46 1
47 1
48 2
49 50 1
51 1
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 69 25 - 51 35 mph 40 mph 29 - 38 49 71% 7% / 5 22% / 15

SPEED PARAMETERS
#7 - Live Oak Ave Bet Oakley Rd & Main Ave
City of Oakley
Southbound Spot Speeds
10:10-11:35
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-007
02468
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
123
Day: Thursday City: Oakley
Date: Project #: CA24_080066_007
NB SB EB WB Total
1,632 1,201 0 0 2,833

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 24 6 12:00 10 16 26 00:00 01:00 4 14 18
0:15 01 1 12:15 13 11 24 01:00 02:00 37 10
0:30 14 5 12:30 19 20 39 02:00 03:00 46 10
0:45 15 6 12:45 30 17 47 03:00 04:00 14 5 19
1:00 03 3 13:00 26 28 54 04:00 05:00 53 9 62
1:15 10 1 13:15 31 16 47 05:00 06:00 51 9 60
1:30 12 3 13:30 28 11 39 06:00 07:00 45 14 59
1:45 12 3 13:45 39 12 51 07:00 08:00 262 82 344
2:00 12 3 14:00 43 18 61 08:00 09:00 172 118 290
2:15 00 0 14:15 43 23 66 09:00 10:00 83 47 130
2:30 02 2 14:30 51 87 138 10:00 11:00 63 43 106
2:45 32 5 14:45 23 26 49 11:00 12:00 57 60 117
3:00 31 4 15:00 17 14 31 12:00 13:00 72 64 136
3:15 12 3 15:15 27 20 47 13:00 14:00 124 67 191
3:30 31 4 15:30 35 29 64 14:00 15:00 160 154 314
3:45 71 8 15:45 23 21 44 15:00 16:00 102 84 186
4:00 10 1 11 16:00 27 24 51 16:00 17:00 96 101 197
4:15 43 7 16:15 26 31 57 17:00 18:00 74 105 179
4:30 17 2 19 16:30 21 18 39 18:00 19:00 63 73 136
4:45 22 3 25 16:45 22 28 50 19:00 20:00 51 61 112
5:00 92 11 17:00 17 36 53 20:00 21:00 33 29 62
5:15 11 1 12 17:15 26 26 52 21:00 22:00 25 24 49
5:30 11 2 13 17:30 10 19 29 22:00 23:00 12 15 27
5:45 20 4 24 17:45 21 24 45 23:00 00:00 9 10 19
6:00 12 3 15 18:00 16 27 43
6:15 11 4 15 18:15 19 19 38 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 10 5 15 18:30 13 13 26 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 12 2 14 18:45 15 14 29 811 414 1225
7:00 17 5 22 19:00 12 18 30 7:30 7:30 7:30
7:15 25 15 40 19:15 11 14 25 344 140 484
7:30 62 18 80 19:30 15 16 31 0.544 0.614 0.599
7:45 158 44 202 19:45 13 13 26
8:00 83 57 140 20:00 10 11 21 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 41 21 62 20:15 85 13 821 787 1608
8:30 28 17 45 20:30 76 13 13:45 14:00 13:45
8:45 20 23 43 20:45 87 15 176 154 316
9:00 28 20 48 21:00 77 14 0.863 0.443 0.572
9:15 16 9 25 21:15 97 16
9:30 19 11 30 21:30 54 9 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 20 7 27 21:45 46 10 434 200 634
10:00 15 11 26 22:00 53 8 7:30 7:30 7:30
10:15 16 9 25 22:15 25 7 344 140 484
10:30 20 13 33 22:30 34 7 0.544 0.614 0.599
10:45 12 10 22 22:45 23 5
11:00 14 13 27 23:00 54 9 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 11 21 32 23:15 11 2 170 206 376
11:30 18 11 29 23:30 13 4 16:00 16:15 16:15
11:45 14 15 29 23:45 22 4 96 113 199
TOTALS 811 414 0 0 1225 TOTALS 821 787 0 0 1608 0.889 0.785 0.873 SPLIT % 66% 34% 0% 0% 43% SPLIT % 51% 49% 0% 0% 57%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
#7 ‐ Live Oak Ave Bet Oakley Rd & Main Ave
4/4/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB
124
Segment #8
Street: Live Oak Avenue
Limits: Oakley Road to Neroly Road/Live Oak Road
Direction: NB/SB
Date /Location of Survey 4/4/2024
Posted Speed Limit (mph) 40
# Speed Data Collected 172
85th Percentile (mph) 43
10 mph Pace 35-44
Percent in Pace 92%
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 4,379
Length of Segment (mi.) 1.12
Street Classification Collector
Date Range Covered Jan 1, 2018 - Dec 31, 2022
Total Accidents 6
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) 0.67
Statewide Average Accident Rate 1.11
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Approved and Authorized for release by the City of Oakley:

Signed:

Title:

Signed: Anna Vickroy, PE, TE
Title: Senior Transportation Engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants §22358.6(a) - Round the speed limit to the nearest 5-mph increment from the 85th percentile speed: 43 --> 45 §22358.6(b) - Not applicable
§22358.6(c) - Lower the speed limit an additional 5 mph from the rounded speed limit if the speed limit was initially rounded up from the 85th percentile speed: 45 --> 40
Speed Limit Change? No
Existing Speed Limit: 40 Recommended Speed Limit: 40
C. Collision History
D. Roadway Conditions
Residential (single-family homes), institutional (church), and open space (agriculture and vacant lot) land uses.

An undivided 2-lane collector. Double yellow lines serve as median. Concrete sidewalks present on easterly side from Gum Tree Rd. to approximately 381 feet south of Gum Tree Rd. and from Jane Ln. to Tate Ln. Concrete sidewalks present on westerly side from approximately 136 feet south of Know Ln. to approximately 161 feet north of Jane Ln. Class II bike lanes on both sides south of Live Oak Ave. All-way stop control present at intersections with Oakley Rd. and Neroly Rd./Live Oak Ave. Side street stop control present at remaining intersections. Right-turn lane pockets at Jane Ln. and Tate Ln. Marked crosswalks present at intersection with Neroly Rd./Live Oak Ave. and Via Delta de Anza Trail. On-street parking present on easterly side from Jane Ln. to Tate Ln. No school zone is present. Horizontal curve present south of Neroly Rd./Live Oak Ave. Gentle vertical curves present along length of segment. Segment generally slopes positively in southerly direction. High driveway density on both sides. Ped-bike trail present along canal at southern end of segment.

Factors
A. Prevailing Speed Data
B. Traffic Factors
This survey conforms to Section 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic. 125
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30 1
31 32 4
33 2
34 35 6
36 9
37 17
38 27
39 23
40 20
41 10
42 13
43 20
44 13
45 6
46 1
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 172 30 - 46 39 mph 43 mph 35 - 44 158 92% 4% / 7 5% / 7

SPEED PARAMETERS
#8 - Live Oak Ave Bet Neroly Rd & Oakley Rd
City of Oakley
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
12:00-13:00
4/4/2024
Project #: 24-080067-008
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
126
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30 1
31 32
33 1
34 35 1
36 1
37 1
38 10
39 8
40 15
41 8
42 10
43 13
44 10
45 5
46 1
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 85 30 - 46 41 mph 44 mph 36 - 45 81 95% 3% / 3 2% / 1

SPEED PARAMETERS
#8 - Live Oak Ave Bet Neroly Rd & Oakley Rd
City of Oakley
Northbound Spot Speeds
12:00-13:00
4/4/2024
Project #: 24-080067-008
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
127
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32 4
33 1
34 35 5
36 8
37 16
38 17
39 15
40 5
41 2
42 3
43 7
44 3
45 1
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 87 32 - 45 38 mph 42 mph 35 - 44 81 93% 5% / 5 2% / 1

SPEED PARAMETERS
#8 - Live Oak Ave Bet Neroly Rd & Oakley Rd
City of Oakley
Southbound Spot Speeds
12:00-13:00
4/4/2024
Project #: 24-080067-008
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
128
Day: Thursday City: Oakley
Date: Project #: CA24_080066_008
NB SB EB WB Total
2,269 2,110 0 0 4,379

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 52 7 12:00 22 26 48 00:00 01:00 21 12 33
0:15 63 9 12:15 24 24 48 01:00 02:00 73 10
0:30 75 12 12:30 29 34 63 02:00 03:00 13 4
0:45 32 5 12:45 34 26 60 03:00 04:00 69 15
1:00 02 2 13:00 29 36 65 04:00 05:00 22 46 68
1:15 30 3 13:15 44 30 74 05:00 06:00 17 55 72
1:30 10 1 13:30 37 28 65 06:00 07:00 31 81 112
1:45 31 4 13:45 41 28 69 07:00 08:00 115 181 296
2:00 00 0 14:00 52 30 82 08:00 09:00 150 228 378
2:15 11 2 14:15 52 31 83 09:00 10:00 102 122 224
2:30 02 2 14:30 39 49 88 10:00 11:00 103 115 218
2:45 00 0 14:45 49 41 90 11:00 12:00 98 129 227
3:00 23 5 15:00 47 37 84 12:00 13:00 109 110 219
3:15 11 2 15:15 48 40 88 13:00 14:00 151 122 273
3:30 11 2 15:30 72 41 113 14:00 15:00 192 151 343
3:45 24 6 15:45 45 35 80 15:00 16:00 212 153 365
4:00 56 11 16:00 49 32 81 16:00 17:00 207 144 351
4:15 0 15 15 16:15 51 47 98 17:00 18:00 174 136 310
4:30 6 14 20 16:30 50 34 84 18:00 19:00 170 117 287
4:45 11 11 22 16:45 57 31 88 19:00 20:00 135 87 222
5:00 1 11 12 17:00 56 40 96 20:00 21:00 108 54 162
5:15 5 14 19 17:15 46 30 76 21:00 22:00 67 26 93
5:30 2 16 18 17:30 28 34 62 22:00 23:00 39 12 51
5:45 9 14 23 17:45 44 32 76 23:00 00:00 32 14 46
6:00 8 23 31 18:00 37 35 72
6:15 8 16 24 18:15 59 29 88 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 7 16 23 18:30 33 29 62 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 8 26 34 18:45 41 24 65 673 984 1657
7:00 16 23 39 19:00 34 27 61 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 14 37 51 19:15 34 26 60 168 265 433
7:30 39 42 81 19:30 38 20 58 0.894 0.761 0.866
7:45 46 79 125 19:45 29 14 43
8:00 31 87 118 20:00 37 19 56 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 47 55 102 20:15 25 14 39 1596 1126 2722
8:30 44 44 88 20:30 27 10 37 15:30 14:30 14:45
8:45 28 42 70 20:45 19 11 30 217 167 375
9:00 20 38 58 21:00 21 9 30 0.753 0.852 0.830
9:15 26 20 46 21:15 18 9 27
9:30 33 38 71 21:30 19 2 21 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 23 26 49 21:45 96 15 265 409 674
10:00 23 30 53 22:00 11 4 15 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 23 34 57 22:15 13 2 15 168 265 433
10:30 29 24 53 22:30 10 3 13 0.894 0.761 0.866
10:45 28 27 55 22:45 53 8
11:00 23 27 50 23:00 53 8 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 25 26 51 23:15 13 4 17 381 280 661
11:30 24 42 66 23:30 75 12 16:15 16:15 16:15
11:45 26 34 60 23:45 72 9 214 152 366
TOTALS 673 984 0 0 1657 TOTALS 1596 1126 0 0 2722 0.939 0.809 0.934 SPLIT % 41% 59% 0% 0% 38% SPLIT % 59% 41% 0% 0% 62%
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
# 8 ‐ Live Oak Ave Bet Neroly Rd & Oakley Rd
4/4/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
0 50
100
150
200
250
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB
129
Segment #9
Street: Neroly Road
Limits: Main Street to Oakley Road
Direction: NB/SB
Date /Location of Survey 4/5/2024
Posted Speed Limit (mph) 40
# Speed Data Collected 175
85th Percentile (mph) 43
10 mph Pace 32-41
Percent in Pace 67%
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,726
Length of Segment (mi.) 0.50
Street Classification Major Arterial
Date Range Covered Jan 1, 2018 - Dec 31, 2022
Total Accidents 3
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) 0.57
Statewide Average Accident Rate 1.11
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Approved and Authorized for release by the City of Oakley:

Signed:

Title:

Signed: Anna Vickroy, PE, TE
Title: Senior Transportation Engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants §22358.6(a) - Round the speed limit to the nearest 5-mph increment from the 85th percentile speed: 43 --> 45 §22358.6(b) - Not applicable
§22358.6(c) - Lower the speed limit an additional 5 mph from the rounded speed limit if the speed limit was initially rounded up from the 85th percentile speed: 45 --> 40
Speed Limit Change? No
Existing Speed Limit: 40 Recommended Speed Limit: 40
C. Collision History
D. Roadway Conditions
Residential (single-family homes), commercial (car wash, fast food restaurant, auto maintenance), industrial (corporation yard), and open space (agriculture, vacant lot) land uses.

An undivided 2-lane major arterial. Single striped yellow line serves as median. Concrete sidewalk present on westerly side from Main St. to approximately 468 feet south of Main St. No bicycle facilities present along segment. Signal at intersection with Main St. All-way stop control at Oakley Rd. Left-turn lane pocket at approach to intersection with Main St. Marked crosswalks present at intersection with Main St. On-street parking present at north end of segment on westerly side. No school zone is present. No horizontal curves present. Gentle vertical curves present along segment. Segment slopes positively in southerly direction. High driveway density on both sides.

Factors
A. Prevailing Speed Data
B. Traffic Factors
This survey conforms to Section 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic. 130
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 1
27 3
28 3
29 4
30 5
31 4
32 9
33 10
34 7
35 12
36 11
37 12
38 19
39 10
40 14
41 14
42 7
43 5
44 7
45 9
46 3
47 4
48 2
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 175 26 - 48 38 mph 43 mph 32 - 41 118 67% 11% / 20 22% / 37

SPEED PARAMETERS
#9 - Neroly Rd Bet Oakley Rd & Main St
City of Oakley
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:45-12:45
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-009
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
131
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 1
27 1
28 2
29 2
30 1
31 2
32 5
33 5
34 3
35 7
36 5
37 5
38 6
39 2
40 7
41 5
42 3
43 4
44 3
45 6
46 3
47 1
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 79 26 - 47 38 mph 44 mph 32 - 41 50 63% 11% / 9 26% / 20

SPEED PARAMETERS
#9 - Neroly Rd Bet Oakley Rd & Main St
City of Oakley
Northbound Spot Speeds
11:45-12:45
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-009
02468
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
132
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 2
28 1
29 2
30 4
31 2
32 4
33 5
34 4
35 5
36 6
37 7
38 13
39 8
40 7
41 9
42 4
43 1
44 4
45 3
46 47 3
48 2
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 96 27 - 48 38 mph 42 mph 32 - 41 68 71% 11% / 11 18% / 17

SPEED PARAMETERS
#9 - Neroly Rd Bet Oakley Rd & Main St
City of Oakley
Southbound Spot Speeds
11:45-12:45
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-009
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
133
Day: Thursday City: Oakley
Date: Project #: CA24_080066_009
NB SB EB WB Total
2,802 2,924 0 0 5,726

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 32 5 12:00 47 42 89 00:00 01:00 12 15 27
0:15 36 9 12:15 40 25 65 01:00 02:00 9 10 19
0:30 45 9 12:30 31 38 69 02:00 03:00 12 10 22
0:45 22 4 12:45 49 45 94 03:00 04:00 18 11 29
1:00 32 5 13:00 45 48 93 04:00 05:00 50 36 86
1:15 22 4 13:15 50 44 94 05:00 06:00 82 36 118
1:30 34 7 13:30 48 48 96 06:00 07:00 130 80 210
1:45 12 3 13:45 44 39 83 07:00 08:00 175 122 297
2:00 40 4 14:00 40 47 87 08:00 09:00 206 153 359
2:15 02 2 14:15 47 58 105 09:00 10:00 165 135 300
2:30 65 11 14:30 46 74 120 10:00 11:00 140 156 296
2:45 23 5 14:45 54 69 123 11:00 12:00 143 157 300
3:00 13 4 15:00 44 60 104 12:00 13:00 167 150 317
3:15 52 7 15:15 45 53 98 13:00 14:00 187 179 366
3:30 61 7 15:30 41 57 98 14:00 15:00 187 248 435
3:45 65 11 15:45 54 79 133 15:00 16:00 184 249 433
4:00 10 8 18 16:00 56 65 121 16:00 17:00 215 272 487
4:15 77 14 16:15 48 74 122 17:00 18:00 233 296 529
4:30 16 8 24 16:30 56 56 112 18:00 19:00 167 212 379
4:45 17 13 30 16:45 55 77 132 19:00 20:00 120 152 272
5:00 12 4 16 17:00 58 80 138 20:00 21:00 67 105 172
5:15 21 9 30 17:15 56 82 138 21:00 22:00 72 69 141
5:30 25 11 36 17:30 68 61 129 22:00 23:00 43 44 87
5:45 24 12 36 17:45 51 73 124 23:00 00:00 18 27 45
6:00 33 17 50 18:00 43 72 115
6:15 26 16 42 18:15 34 55 89 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 36 20 56 18:30 46 49 95 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 35 27 62 18:45 44 36 80 1142 921 2063
7:00 33 20 53 19:00 47 43 90 8:00 10:45 8:00
7:15 50 21 71 19:15 23 46 69 206 176 359
7:30 52 29 81 19:30 27 24 51 0.920 0.746 0.965
7:45 40 52 92 19:45 23 39 62
8:00 50 35 85 20:00 19 24 43 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 51 38 89 20:15 17 32 49 1660 2003 3663
8:30 49 43 92 20:30 19 27 46 16:45 16:45 16:45
8:45 56 37 93 20:45 12 22 34 237 300 537
9:00 35 36 71 21:00 27 17 44 0.871 0.915 0.973
9:15 42 37 79 21:15 23 13 36
9:30 38 31 69 21:30 13 15 28 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 50 31 81 21:45 9 24 33 381 275 656
10:00 35 30 65 22:00 16 17 33 8:00 7:45 8:00
10:15 30 35 65 22:15 11 10 21 206 168 359
10:30 31 32 63 22:30 13 8 21 0.920 0.808 0.965
10:45 44 59 103 22:45 39 12
11:00 29 38 67 23:00 37 10 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 44 36 80 23:15 5 11 16 448 568 1016
11:30 34 43 77 23:30 65 11 16:45 16:45 16:45
11:45 36 40 76 23:45 44 8 237 300 537
TOTALS 1142 921 0 0 2063 TOTALS 1660 2003 0 0 3663 0.871 0.915 0.973 SPLIT % 55% 45% 0% 0% 36% SPLIT % 45% 55% 0% 0% 64%
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
#9 ‐ Neroly Rd Bet Oakley Rd & Main St
4/4/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB
134
Segment #10
Street: Neroly Road
Limits: Oakley Road to Live Oak Avenue
Direction: NB/SB
Date /Location of Survey 4/4/2024
Posted Speed Limit (mph) 45
# Speed Data Collected 168
85th Percentile (mph) 46
10 mph Pace 35-44
Percent in Pace 76%
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 3,553
Length of Segment (mi.) 1.31
Street Classification Minor Arterial
Date Range Covered Jan 1, 2018 - Dec 31, 2022
Total Accidents 0
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) 0.00
Statewide Average Accident Rate 1.11
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Approved and Authorized for release by the City of Oakley:

Signed:

Title:

Signed: Anna Vickroy, PE, TE
Title: Senior Transportation Engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants §22358.6(a) - Round the speed limit to the nearest 5-mph increment from the 85th percentile speed: 46 --> 45 Speed Limit Change? No
Existing Speed Limit: 45 Recommended Speed Limit: 45
C. Collision History
D. Roadway Conditions
Residential (single-family homes), utilities (railroad right-of-way, canal), and open space (agriculture, vacant lots) land uses.

An undivided 2-lane minor arterial. Single striped yellow line and double yellow lines serve as medians. Concrete sidewalk present on northerly side from Live Oak Ave. to approximately 253 feet west of Omega Ln. Class II bike lane on northerly side from Live Oak Ave. to approximately 250 feet west of Placer Dr. Class II bike lane on southerly side from Live Oak Ave. to approximately 90 feet west of Omega Ln. Signal at intersection with Via Delta de Anza Trail. All-way stop control at intersections with Oakley Rd. and Live Oak Ave.

Side street stop control at remaining intersections. Left-turn lane pocket at approach to intersection with Live Oak Ave. Marked crosswalks present at intersections with Live Oak Ave. and Via Delta de Anza Trail. No on-street parking present. No school zone is present. Broad horizontal curves present south of Regal Ct. Gentle vertical curves present throughout segment. High driveway density on both sides north of Omega Ln.

Factors
A. Prevailing Speed Data
B. Traffic Factors
This survey conforms to Section 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic. 135
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 1
28 29
30 2
31 32
33 3
34 6
35 5
36 10
37 4
38 10
39 15
40 24
41 15
42 20
43 14
44 10
45 3
46 11
47 5
48 5
49 1
50 1
51 2
52 1
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 168 27 - 52 41 mph 46 mph 35 - 44 127 76% 7% / 12 18% / 29

SPEED PARAMETERS
#10 - Neroly Rd Bet Oakley Rd & Live Oak Ave
City of Oakley
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:10-10:20
4/4/2024
Project #: 24-080067-010
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
136
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 1
28 29
30 2
31 32
33 3
34 5
35 4
36 9
37 2
38 2
39 13
40 9
41 2
42 9
43 4
44 5
45 46 9
47 3
48 2
49 50 1
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 85 27 - 50 40 mph 46 mph 34 - 43 59 69% 7% / 6 24% / 20

SPEED PARAMETERS
#10 - Neroly Rd Bet Oakley Rd & Live Oak Ave
City of Oakley
Northbound Spot Speeds
09:10-10:20
4/4/2024
Project #: 24-080067-010
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
137
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34 1
35 1
36 1
37 2
38 8
39 2
40 15
41 13
42 11
43 10
44 5
45 3
46 2
47 2
48 3
49 1
50 51 2
52 1
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 83 34 - 52 41 mph 45 mph 37 - 46 71 86% 3% / 3 11% / 9

SPEED PARAMETERS
#10 - Neroly Rd Bet Oakley Rd & Live Oak Ave
City of Oakley
Southbound Spot Speeds
09:10-10:20
4/4/2024
Project #: 24-080067-010
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
138
Day: Thursday City: Oakley
Date: Project #: CA24_080066_010
NB SB EB WB Total
1,593 1,960 0 0 3,553

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 11 2 12:00 21 30 51 00:00 01:00 65 11
0:15 21 3 12:15 13 15 28 01:00 02:00 34 7
0:30 23 5 12:30 15 26 41 02:00 03:00 55 10
0:45 10 1 12:45 30 30 60 03:00 04:00 76 13
1:00 22 4 13:00 17 29 46 04:00 05:00 16 15 31
1:15 00 0 13:15 20 19 39 05:00 06:00 22 19 41
1:30 12 3 13:30 30 34 64 06:00 07:00 54 38 92
1:45 00 0 13:45 32 30 62 07:00 08:00 65 89 154
2:00 10 1 14:00 19 35 54 08:00 09:00 138 133 271
2:15 12 3 14:15 18 33 51 09:00 10:00 97 110 207
2:30 13 4 14:30 27 41 68 10:00 11:00 81 98 179
2:45 20 2 14:45 36 44 80 11:00 12:00 90 102 192
3:00 21 3 15:00 24 59 83 12:00 13:00 79 101 180
3:15 32 5 15:15 47 40 87 13:00 14:00 99 112 211
3:30 11 2 15:30 56 49 105 14:00 15:00 100 153 253
3:45 12 3 15:45 40 47 87 15:00 16:00 167 195 362
4:00 42 6 16:00 31 40 71 16:00 17:00 120 188 308
4:15 25 7 16:15 37 41 78 17:00 18:00 132 207 339
4:30 43 7 16:30 21 51 72 18:00 19:00 111 163 274
4:45 65 11 16:45 31 56 87 19:00 20:00 70 95 165
5:00 42 6 17:00 33 57 90 20:00 21:00 56 58 114
5:15 32 5 17:15 38 49 87 21:00 22:00 40 32 72
5:30 59 14 17:30 37 47 84 22:00 23:00 24 19 43
5:45 10 6 16 17:45 24 54 78 23:00 00:00 11 13 24
6:00 12 5 17 18:00 22 45 67
6:15 11 12 23 18:15 27 39 66 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 21 11 32 18:30 30 36 66 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 10 10 20 18:45 32 43 75 584 624 1208
7:00 18 12 30 19:00 25 34 59 8:00 7:45 7:45
7:15 13 14 27 19:15 21 24 45 138 150 279
7:30 14 21 35 19:30 13 17 30 0.841 0.815 0.943
7:45 20 42 62 19:45 11 20 31
8:00 28 46 74 20:00 18 14 32 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 41 32 73 20:15 12 16 28 1009 1336 2345
8:30 40 30 70 20:30 14 13 27 15:15 16:30 15:00
8:45 29 25 54 20:45 12 15 27 174 213 362
9:00 19 30 49 21:00 10 9 19 0.777 0.934 0.862
9:15 26 33 59 21:15 9 10 19
9:30 27 20 47 21:30 14 8 22 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 25 27 52 21:45 75 12 203 222 425
10:00 22 27 49 22:00 76 13 8:00 7:45 7:45
10:15 17 13 30 22:15 85 13 138 150 279
10:30 21 21 42 22:30 55 10 0.841 0.815 0.943
10:45 21 37 58 22:45 43 7
11:00 19 30 49 23:00 31 4 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 22 27 49 23:15 23 5 252 395 647
11:30 29 25 54 23:30 35 8 16:45 16:30 16:45
11:45 20 20 40 23:45 34 7 139 213 348
TOTALS 584 624 0 0 1208 TOTALS 1009 1336 0 0 2345 0.914 0.934 0.967 SPLIT % 48% 52% 0% 0% 34% SPLIT % 43% 57% 0% 0% 66%
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
#10 ‐ Neroly Rd Bet Oakley Rd & Live Oak Ave
4/4/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
0 50
100
150
200
250
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB
139
Segment #11
Street: Neroly Road
Limits: Laurel Road to Empire Avenue
Direction: NB/SB
Date /Location of Survey 4/5/2024
Posted Speed Limit (mph) 50
# Speed Data Collected 141
85th Percentile (mph) 52
10 mph Pace 43-52
Percent in Pace 84%
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,310
Length of Segment (mi.) 0.69
Street Classification Minor Arterial
Date Range Covered Jan 1, 2018 - Dec 31, 2022
Total Accidents 2
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) 0.30
Statewide Average Accident Rate 1.11
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Approved and Authorized for release by the City of Oakley:

Signed:

Title:

Signed: Anna Vickroy, PE, TE
Title: Senior Transportation Engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants §22358.6(a) - Round the speed limit to the nearest 5-mph increment from the 85th percentile speed: 52 --> 50 Speed Limit Change? No
Existing Speed Limit: 50 Recommended Speed Limit: 50
C. Collision History
D. Roadway Conditions
Utility (water treatment plan), and open space (agriculture, vacant lots) land uses.

An undivided 2-lane minor arterial. Single striped yellow line, double yellow lines, and raised median serve as medians. Concrete sidewalk present on easterly side north of driveway to Randall-Bold Water Treatment Plant. Class II bike lanes on both sides from Empire Ave. to approximately 550 feet west of Empire Ave. Signal at intersection with Empire Ave. Side street stop control at driveway to Randall-Bold Water Treatment Plant. Left-turn lane pockets at approach to intersection with Empire Ave. Marked crosswalks present at intersection with Empire Ave. No on-street parking present. No school zone is present. Broad horizontal curve present on approach to Empire Ave. Low driveway density throughout length of segment. Laurel Rd. grade separated from Neroly Rd. via overcrossing.

Factors
A. Prevailing Speed Data
B. Traffic Factors
This survey conforms to Section 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic. 140
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 50 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40 1
41 1
42 3
43 8
44 6
45 11
46 13
47 16
48 17
49 19
50 12
51 8
52 8
53 5
54 4
55 5
56 2
57 58 2
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 141 40 - 58 48 mph 52 mph 43 - 52 118 84% 3% / 5 13% / 18

SPEED PARAMETERS
#11 - Neroly Rd Bet Empire Ave & Laurel Rd
City of Oakley
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
13:40-14:10
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-011
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
141
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 50 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40 1
41 1
42 2
43 5
44 4
45 6
46 7
47 7
48 9
49 9
50 7
51 4
52 5
53 3
54 2
55 4
56 1
57 58 1
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 78 40 - 58 48 mph 52 mph 43 - 52 63 81% 5% / 4 15% / 11

SPEED PARAMETERS
#11 - Neroly Rd Bet Empire Ave & Laurel Rd
City of Oakley
Eastbound Spot Speeds
13:40-14:10
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-011
0 2 4 6 8 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
142
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 50 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42 1
43 3
44 2
45 5
46 6
47 9
48 8
49 10
50 5
51 4
52 3
53 2
54 2
55 1
56 1
57 58 1
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 63 42 - 58 48 mph 52 mph 43 - 52 55 87% 1% / 1 12% / 7

SPEED PARAMETERS
#11 - Neroly Rd Bet Empire Ave & Laurel Rd
City of Oakley
Westbound Spot Speeds
13:40-14:10
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-011
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
143
Day: Thursday City: Oakley
Date: Project #: CA24_080066_011
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 2,363 2,947 5,310

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 13 4 12:00 33 37 70 00:00 01:00 7 10 17
0:15 11 2 12:15 20 24 44 01:00 02:00 43 7
0:30 54 9 12:30 35 33 68 02:00 03:00 34 7
0:45 02 2 12:45 35 36 71 03:00 04:00 6 11 17
1:00 32 5 13:00 34 34 68 04:00 05:00 12 52 64
1:15 01 1 13:15 32 55 87 05:00 06:00 23 84 107
1:30 10 1 13:30 45 42 87 06:00 07:00 47 112 159
1:45 00 0 13:45 36 48 84 07:00 08:00 135 184 319
2:00 00 0 14:00 31 37 68 08:00 09:00 247 318 565
2:15 12 3 14:15 46 40 86 09:00 10:00 105 166 271
2:30 21 3 14:30 47 46 93 10:00 11:00 118 137 255
2:45 01 1 14:45 52 49 101 11:00 12:00 121 137 258
3:00 32 5 15:00 59 48 107 12:00 13:00 123 130 253
3:15 15 6 15:15 48 61 109 13:00 14:00 147 179 326
3:30 12 3 15:30 59 114 173 14:00 15:00 176 172 348
3:45 12 3 15:45 45 79 124 15:00 16:00 211 302 513
4:00 1 13 14 16:00 37 59 96 16:00 17:00 214 207 421
4:15 5 12 17 16:15 56 54 110 17:00 18:00 225 241 466
4:30 5 12 17 16:30 61 54 115 18:00 19:00 181 170 351
4:45 1 15 16 16:45 60 40 100 19:00 20:00 120 128 248
5:00 6 24 30 17:00 64 63 127 20:00 21:00 68 102 170
5:15 4 19 23 17:15 52 62 114 21:00 22:00 34 55 89
5:30 5 20 25 17:30 49 59 108 22:00 23:00 16 28 44
5:45 8 21 29 17:45 60 57 117 23:00 00:00 20 15 35
6:00 7 23 30 18:00 55 45 100
6:15 13 25 38 18:15 42 56 98 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 17 31 48 18:30 38 32 70 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 10 33 43 18:45 46 37 83 828 1218 2046
7:00 12 39 51 19:00 36 39 75 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 27 43 70 19:15 36 35 71 272 322 594
7:30 33 48 81 19:30 28 24 52 0.756 0.732 0.807
7:45 63 54 117 19:45 20 30 50
8:00 90 62 152 20:00 22 26 48 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 74 110 184 20:15 20 23 43 1535 1729 3264
8:30 45 96 141 20:30 15 33 48 16:15 15:15 15:00
8:45 38 50 88 20:45 11 20 31 241 313 513
9:00 28 44 72 21:00 13 13 26 0.941 0.686 0.741
9:15 25 37 62 21:15 12 22 34
9:30 22 50 72 21:30 3 13 16 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 30 35 65 21:45 67 13 382 502 884
10:00 29 36 65 22:00 7 11 18 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 25 28 53 22:15 4 11 15 272 322 594
10:30 27 35 62 22:30 54 9 0.756 0.732 0.807
10:45 37 38 75 22:45 02 2
11:00 31 29 60 23:00 44 8 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 35 34 69 23:15 33 6 439 448 887
11:30 24 45 69 23:30 66 12 16:15 17:00 17:00
11:45 31 29 60 23:45 72 9 241 241 466
TOTALS 0 0 828 1218 2046 TOTALS 0 0 1535 1729 3264 0.941 0.956 0.917 SPLIT % 0% 0% 40% 60% 39% SPLIT % 0% 0% 47% 53% 61%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
#11 ‐ Neroly Rd Bet Empire Ave & Laurel Rd
4/4/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB
144
Segment #12
Street: Oakley Road
Limits: Empire Avenue to Live Oak Avenue
Direction: EB/WB
Date /Location of Survey 4/5/2024
Posted Speed Limit (mph) 35
# Speed Data Collected 126
85th Percentile (mph) 40
10 mph Pace 31-40
Percent in Pace 68%
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 4,201
Length of Segment (mi.) 0.53
Street Classification Major Arterial
Date Range Covered Jan 1, 2018 - Dec 31, 2022
Total Accidents 2
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) 0.49
Statewide Average Accident Rate 1.11
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Approved and Authorized for release by the City of Oakley:

Signed:

Title:

Signed: Anna Vickroy, PE, TE
Title: Senior Transportation Engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants §22358.6(a) - Round the speed limit to the nearest 5-mph increment from the 85th percentile speed: 40 --> 40 §22358.6(b) - Not applicable
§22358.6(c) - Lower the speed limit an additional 5 mph from the rounded speed limit if the speed limit was initially rounded up from the 85th percentile speed: 40 --> 35
Speed Limit Change? No
Existing Speed Limit: 35 Recommended Speed Limit: 35
C. Collision History
D. Roadway Conditions
Residential (single-family homes), commercial (gas station), and open space (agriculture, vacant lots) land uses.

A divided 3-lane major arterial. Double yellow lines and raised median serve as medians. Intermittent concrete sidewalks on southerly side. Class II bike lanes present east of Kelsey Ln. Signal at intersection with Empire Ave. All-way stop control at intersections with Live Oak Ave. and Kelsey Ln./Beldin Ln. Side street stop control present at remaining intersections. Left-turn lane pockets present along segment on approaches to intersections with Kenwood Cir., Kelsey Ln./Beldin Ln., Montevino Wy./Trenton St., and Empire Ave. Rightturn lane pockets present along segment on approaches to intersections with Kelsey Ln./Beldin Ln. and Empire Ave. Marked crosswalks present at interesctions with Kenwood Cir., Kelsey Ln./Beldin Ln., Montevino Wy./Trenton St., Canopy Ln., and Empire Ave.

No on-street parking present. No school zone is present. Horizontal curve present at approach to intersection with Empire Ave. Gentle vertical curves along length of segment. High driveway density throughout length of segment.

Factors
A. Prevailing Speed Data
B. Traffic Factors
This survey conforms to Section 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic. 145
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 1
27 3
28 4
29 10
30 4
31 7
32 10
33 9
34 14
35 8
36 8
37 5
38 6
39 13
40 6
41 5
42 5
43 5
44 1
45 46 1
47 48
49 1
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 126 26 - 49 35 mph 40 mph 31 - 40 86 68% 17% / 22 15% / 18

SPEED PARAMETERS
#12 - Oakley Rd Bet Empire Ave & Live Oak Ave
City of Oakley
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
13:00-13:55
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-012
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
146
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 2
28 2
29 3
30 2
31 3
32 7
33 4
34 6
35 2
36 6
37 3
38 5
39 7
40 3
41 4
42 3
43 2
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 64 27 - 43 36 mph 40 mph 32 - 41 47 73% 18% / 12 8% / 5

SPEED PARAMETERS
#12 - Oakley Rd Bet Empire Ave & Live Oak Ave
City of Oakley
Eastbound Spot Speeds
13:00-13:55
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-012
02468
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
147
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 1
27 1
28 2
29 7
30 2
31 4
32 3
33 5
34 8
35 6
36 2
37 2
38 1
39 6
40 3
41 1
42 2
43 3
44 1
45 46 1
47 48
49 1
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 62 26 - 49 34 mph 40 mph 28 - 37 41 66% 3% / 2 31% / 19

SPEED PARAMETERS
#12 - Oakley Rd Bet Empire Ave & Live Oak Ave
City of Oakley
Westbound Spot Speeds
13:00-13:55
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-012
0 2 4 6 8 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
148
Day: Thursday City: Oakley
Date: Project #: CA24_080066_012
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 2,106 2,095 4,201

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 71 8 12:00 29 24 53 00:00 01:00 24 5 29
0:15 41 5 12:15 34 26 60 01:00 02:00 84 12
0:30 90 9 12:30 28 31 59 02:00 03:00 87 15
0:45 43 7 12:45 23 35 58 03:00 04:00 3 12 15
1:00 12 3 13:00 38 37 75 04:00 05:00 11 49 60
1:15 21 3 13:15 28 28 56 05:00 06:00 10 74 84
1:30 41 5 13:30 33 38 71 06:00 07:00 45 98 143
1:45 10 1 13:45 25 32 57 07:00 08:00 72 164 236
2:00 31 4 14:00 47 34 81 08:00 09:00 112 168 280
2:15 01 1 14:15 34 39 73 09:00 10:00 74 100 174
2:30 22 4 14:30 66 35 101 10:00 11:00 77 91 168
2:45 33 6 14:45 46 35 81 11:00 12:00 99 101 200
3:00 01 1 15:00 43 35 78 12:00 13:00 114 116 230
3:15 13 4 15:15 45 40 85 13:00 14:00 124 135 259
3:30 13 4 15:30 50 57 107 14:00 15:00 193 143 336
3:45 15 6 15:45 49 48 97 15:00 16:00 187 180 367
4:00 16 7 16:00 55 51 106 16:00 17:00 231 171 402
4:15 59 14 16:15 54 43 97 17:00 18:00 232 128 360
4:30 1 18 19 16:30 58 39 97 18:00 19:00 169 125 294
4:45 4 16 20 16:45 64 38 102 19:00 20:00 123 103 226
5:00 2 15 17 17:00 63 22 85 20:00 21:00 78 63 141
5:15 1 16 17 17:15 58 42 100 21:00 22:00 59 32 91
5:30 2 13 15 17:30 54 31 85 22:00 23:00 34 16 50
5:45 5 30 35 17:45 57 33 90 23:00 00:00 19 10 29
6:00 8 21 29 18:00 44 41 85
6:15 10 21 31 18:15 59 30 89 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 14 20 34 18:30 37 25 62 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 13 36 49 18:45 29 29 58 543 873 1416
7:00 14 24 38 19:00 40 27 67 7:45 7:30 7:45
7:15 15 26 41 19:15 38 36 74 124 216 334
7:30 14 42 56 19:30 27 18 45 0.721 0.750 0.773
7:45 29 72 101 19:45 18 22 40
8:00 43 65 108 20:00 24 23 47 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 25 37 62 20:15 19 16 35 1563 1222 2785
8:30 27 36 63 20:30 20 11 31 16:30 15:30 15:30
8:45 17 30 47 20:45 15 13 28 243 199 407
9:00 17 19 36 21:00 16 10 26 0.949 0.873 0.951
9:15 20 24 44 21:15 14 7 21
9:30 21 26 47 21:30 11 8 19 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 16 31 47 21:45 18 7 25 184 332 516
10:00 23 21 44 22:00 11 4 15 7:45 7:30 7:45
10:15 12 30 42 22:15 10 3 13 124 216 334
10:30 22 18 40 22:30 76 13 0.721 0.750 0.773
10:45 20 22 42 22:45 63 9
11:00 17 23 40 23:00 74 11 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 31 28 59 23:15 63 9 463 299 762
11:30 29 22 51 23:30 42 6 16:30 16:00 16:00
11:45 22 28 50 23:45 21 3 243 171 402
TOTALS 0 0 543 873 1416 TOTALS 0 0 1563 1222 2785 0.949 0.838 0.948 SPLIT % 0% 0% 38% 62% 34% SPLIT % 0% 0% 56% 44% 66%
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
#12 ‐ Oakley Rd Bet Empire Ave & Live Oak Ave
4/4/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
0 50
100
150
200
250
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB
149
Segment #13
Street: Oakley Road
Limits: Live Oak Avenue to Western City limits
Direction: EB/WB
Date /Location of Survey 4/9/2024
Posted Speed Limit (mph) 45
# Speed Data Collected 153
85th Percentile (mph) 48
10 mph Pace 38-47
Percent in Pace 61%
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 3,040
Length of Segment (mi.) 0.74
Street Classification Minor Arterial
Date Range Covered Jan 1, 2018 - Dec 31, 2022
Total Accidents 3
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) 0.73
Statewide Average Accident Rate 1.11
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Approved and Authorized for release by the City of Oakley:

Signed:

Title:

Signed: Anna Vickroy, PE, TE
Title: Senior Transportation Engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants §22358.6(a) - Round the speed limit to the nearest 5-mph increment from the 85th percentile speed: 48 --> 50 §22358.6(b) - Not applicable
§22358.6(c) - Lower the speed limit an additional 5 mph from the rounded speed limit if the speed limit was initially rounded up from the 85th percentile speed: 50 --> 45
Speed Limit Change? No
Existing Speed Limit: 45 Recommended Speed Limit: 45
C. Collision History
D. Roadway Conditions
Residential (single-family homes), industrial (warehouses), and open space (agriculture, vacant lots) land uses.

An undivided 2-lane minor arterial. Double yellow lines serve as median. No concrete sidewalks present. No bicycle facilities present along segment. All-way stop control present at intersections with Live Oak Ave. and Neroly Rd. Side street stop control present at remaining intersections. No turn pockets present. No marked crosswalks present. No on-street parking present. No school zone is present. No horizontal curves present. Gentle vertical curves present along segment. Segment slopes positively in westerly direction.

Intermittent high and low driveway densities along segment on both sides.

Factors
A. Prevailing Speed Data
B. Traffic Factors
This survey conforms to Section 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic. 150
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 1
30 31 4
32 3
33 5
34 7
35 7
36 7
37 3
38 11
39 7
40 12
41 11
42 9
43 8
44 11
45 8
46 10
47 6
48 7
49 2
50 5
51 4
52 4
53 54 1
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 153 29 - 54 41 mph 48 mph 38 - 47 93 61% 24% / 37 16% / 23

SPEED PARAMETERS
#13 - Oakley Rd Bet Live Oak Ave & Western City Limits
City of Oakley
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
14:15-15:30
4/9/2024
Project #: 24-080067-013
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
151
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 1
30 31 3
32 2
33 2
34 6
35 5
36 2
37 1
38 4
39 3
40 5
41 7
42 3
43 7
44 5
45 6
46 7
47 5
48 4
49 1
50 3
51 2
52 1
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 85 29 - 52 42 mph 47 mph 38 - 47 52 61% 25% / 22 13% / 11

SPEED PARAMETERS
#13 - Oakley Rd Bet Live Oak Ave & Western City Limits
City of Oakley
Eastbound Spot Speeds
14:15-15:30
4/9/2024
Project #: 24-080067-013
02468
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
152
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 1
32 1
33 3
34 1
35 2
36 5
37 2
38 7
39 4
40 7
41 4
42 6
43 1
44 6
45 2
46 3
47 1
48 3
49 1
50 2
51 2
52 3
53 54 1
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 68 31 - 54 41 mph 48 mph 35 - 44 44 65% 8% / 6 27% / 18

SPEED PARAMETERS
#13 - Oakley Rd Bet Live Oak Ave & Western City Limits
City of Oakley
Westbound Spot Speeds
14:15-15:30
4/9/2024
Project #: 24-080067-013
02468
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
153
Day: Thursday City: Oakley
Date: Project #: CA24_080066_013
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 1,657 1,383 3,040

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 11 2 12:00 25 19 44 00:00 01:00 74 11
0:15 32 5 12:15 33 23 56 01:00 02:00 55 10
0:30 30 3 12:30 22 16 38 02:00 03:00 54 9
0:45 01 1 12:45 16 21 37 03:00 04:00 28 10
1:00 02 2 13:00 29 26 55 04:00 05:00 11 26 37
1:15 22 4 13:15 20 18 38 05:00 06:00 13 43 56
1:30 21 3 13:30 29 23 52 06:00 07:00 27 70 97
1:45 10 1 13:45 33 25 58 07:00 08:00 135 83 218
2:00 00 0 14:00 40 16 56 08:00 09:00 102 95 197
2:15 01 1 14:15 31 27 58 09:00 10:00 69 75 144
2:30 22 4 14:30 58 49 107 10:00 11:00 55 54 109
2:45 31 4 14:45 41 36 77 11:00 12:00 83 65 148
3:00 01 1 15:00 35 22 57 12:00 13:00 96 79 175
3:15 13 4 15:15 34 28 62 13:00 14:00 111 92 203
3:30 02 2 15:30 35 26 61 14:00 15:00 170 128 298
3:45 12 3 15:45 38 33 71 15:00 16:00 142 109 251
4:00 11 2 16:00 37 31 68 16:00 17:00 167 123 290
4:15 35 8 16:15 39 31 70 17:00 18:00 164 97 261
4:30 1 10 11 16:30 42 28 70 18:00 19:00 116 89 205
4:45 6 10 16 16:45 49 33 82 19:00 20:00 85 63 148
5:00 28 10 17:00 45 20 65 20:00 21:00 32 38 70
5:15 4 10 14 17:15 37 32 69 21:00 22:00 35 19 54
5:30 3 10 13 17:30 41 22 63 22:00 23:00 17 8 25
5:45 4 15 19 17:45 41 23 64 23:00 00:00 86 14
6:00 4 14 18 18:00 37 29 66
6:15 10 16 26 18:15 38 18 56 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 8 16 24 18:30 22 19 41 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 5 24 29 18:45 19 23 42 514 532 1046
7:00 15 14 29 19:00 29 22 51 7:30 7:30 7:30
7:15 13 15 28 19:15 28 18 46 181 103 284
7:30 29 24 53 19:30 18 7 25 0.580 0.858 0.657
7:45 78 30 108 19:45 10 16 26
8:00 48 25 73 20:00 12 14 26 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 26 24 50 20:15 78 15 1143 851 1994
8:30 15 23 38 20:30 77 14 16:15 14:30 14:30
8:45 13 23 36 20:45 69 15 175 135 303
9:00 17 14 31 21:00 95 14 0.893 0.689 0.708
9:15 20 18 38 21:15 10 3 13
9:30 18 17 35 21:30 37 10 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 14 26 40 21:45 13 4 17 237 178 415
10:00 15 10 25 22:00 71 8 7:30 7:30 7:30
10:15 14 20 34 22:15 42 6 181 103 284
10:30 10 11 21 22:30 43 7 0.580 0.858 0.657
10:45 16 13 29 22:45 22 4
11:00 15 11 26 23:00 33 6 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 20 21 41 23:15 43 7 331 220 551
11:30 26 11 37 23:30 10 1 16:15 16:00 16:00
11:45 22 22 44 23:45 00 0 175 123 290
TOTALS 0 0 514 532 1046 TOTALS 0 0 1143 851 1994 0.893 0.932 0.884 SPLIT % 0% 0% 49% 51% 34% SPLIT % 0% 0% 57% 43% 66%
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
#13 ‐ Oakley Rd Bet Live Oak Ave & Western City Limits
4/4/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB
154
Segment #14
Street: O'Hara Avenue
Limits: West Cypress Road to Laurel Road
Direction: NB/SB
Date /Location of Survey 4/5/2024
Posted Speed Limit (mph) 35
# Speed Data Collected 121
85th Percentile (mph) 40
10 mph Pace 32-41
Percent in Pace 82%
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 8,246
Length of Segment (mi.) 1.00
Street Classification Collector
Date Range Covered Jan 1, 2018 - Dec 31, 2022
Total Accidents 6
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) 0.40
Statewide Average Accident Rate 1.04
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Approved and Authorized for release by the City of Oakley:

Signed:

Title:

Signed: Anna Vickroy, PE, TE
Title: Senior Transportation Engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants §22358.6(a) - Round the speed limit to the nearest 5-mph increment from the 85th percentile speed: 40 --> 40 §22358.6(b) - Not applicable
§22358.6(c) - Lower the speed limit an additional 5 mph from the rounded speed limit if the speed limit was initially rounded up from the 85th percentile speed: 40 --> 35
Speed Limit Change? No
Existing Speed Limit: 35 Recommended Speed Limit: 35
C. Collision History
D. Roadway Conditions
Residential (single-family homes), commercial (gas station), institutional (middle school, recreation center), and open space (park, vacant lots) land uses.

A divided 4-lane collector. Raised median serves as median. Concrete sidewalks present consistently along westerly side and intermittently along easterly side. Class II bike lanes present on both sides for length of segment except between O'Hara Ct. and driveway to Oakley Recreation Center/O'Hara Park Middle School. Signals at intersections with W. Cypress Rd., Chianti Wy., and Laurel Rd. Side street stop control present at remaining intersections. Left-turn lane pockets present along segment at virtually every intersection except at Woodglen Dr./O'Hara Ct. Marked crosswalks present at intersections with Laurel Rd., Woodglen Dr./O'Hara Ct., Via Delta de Anza Trail, Chianti Wy., Covered Wagon Dr., and W. Cypress Rd. No on-street parking present. School zone is present. No horizontal curves present. Gentle vertical curves present. Medium driveway density on both sides. Segment narrows on bridge over canal.

Factors
A. Prevailing Speed Data
B. Traffic Factors
This survey conforms to Section 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic. 155
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 2
29 2
30 4
31 5
32 8
33 8
34 10
35 9
36 14
37 12
38 14
39 8
40 9
41 7
42 5
43 2
44 45 2
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 121 28 - 45 36 mph 40 mph 32 - 41 99 82% 10% / 13 8% / 9

SPEED PARAMETERS
#14 - O'Hara Ave Bet Laurel Rd & W Cypress Rd
City of Oakley
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:20-11:00
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-014
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
156
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
NorthboundFriday
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 1
29 2
30 3
31 2
32 6
33 5
34 4
35 5
36 6
37 5
38 7
39 3
40 6
41 4
42 3
43 1
44 45 1
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 64 28 - 45 36 mph 40 mph 32 - 41 51 80% 12% / 8 8% / 5

SPEED PARAMETERS
#14 - O'Hara Ave Bet Laurel Rd & W Cypress Rd
City of Oakley
Northbound Spot Speeds
10:20-11:00
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-014
02468
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
157
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 1
29 30 1
31 3
32 2
33 3
34 6
35 4
36 8
37 7
38 7
39 5
40 3
41 3
42 2
43 1
44 45 1
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 57 28 - 45 37 mph 40 mph 31 - 40 48 84% 3% / 2 13% / 7

SPEED PARAMETERS
#14 - O'Hara Ave Bet Laurel Rd & W Cypress Rd
City of Oakley
Southbound Spot Speeds
10:20-11:00
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-014
0 2 4 6 8 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
158
Day: Thursday City: Oakley
Date: Project #: CA24_080066_014
NB SB EB WB Total
4,073 4,173 0 0 8,246

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 54 9 12:00 49 79 128 00:00 01:00 21 14 35
0:15 53 8 12:15 48 57 105 01:00 02:00 10 7 17
0:30 54 9 12:30 46 49 95 02:00 03:00 7 10 17
0:45 63 9 12:45 52 57 109 03:00 04:00 7 17 24
1:00 52 7 13:00 57 63 120 04:00 05:00 12 37 49
1:15 42 6 13:15 82 51 133 05:00 06:00 18 76 94
1:30 11 2 13:30 57 77 134 06:00 07:00 52 91 143
1:45 02 2 13:45 66 75 141 07:00 08:00 205 290 495
2:00 10 1 14:00 72 69 141 08:00 09:00 508 486 994
2:15 11 2 14:15 98 63 161 09:00 10:00 189 198 387
2:30 27 9 14:30 71 80 151 10:00 11:00 216 190 406
2:45 32 5 14:45 110 77 187 11:00 12:00 236 223 459
3:00 15 6 15:00 85 72 157 12:00 13:00 195 242 437
3:15 15 6 15:15 151 160 311 13:00 14:00 262 266 528
3:30 14 5 15:30 130 137 267 14:00 15:00 351 289 640
3:45 43 7 15:45 113 82 195 15:00 16:00 479 451 930
4:00 06 6 16:00 80 85 165 16:00 17:00 309 302 611
4:15 3 11 14 16:15 75 63 138 17:00 18:00 324 264 588
4:30 2 11 13 16:30 75 87 162 18:00 19:00 243 243 486
4:45 79 16 16:45 79 67 146 19:00 20:00 147 177 324
5:00 2 13 15 17:00 71 64 135 20:00 21:00 129 144 273
5:15 5 16 21 17:15 70 60 130 21:00 22:00 72 79 151
5:30 3 22 25 17:30 81 81 162 22:00 23:00 46 48 94
5:45 8 25 33 17:45 102 59 161 23:00 00:00 35 29 64
6:00 13 18 31 18:00 76 65 141
6:15 9 17 26 18:15 54 73 127 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 10 22 32 18:30 56 50 106 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 20 34 54 18:45 57 55 112 1481 1639 3120
7:00 16 21 37 19:00 31 61 92 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 38 48 86 19:15 43 56 99 558 525 1083
7:30 59 97 156 19:30 28 29 57 0.742 0.944 0.828
7:45 92 124 216 19:45 45 31 76
8:00 180 136 316 20:00 45 48 93 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 188 139 327 20:15 36 33 69 2592 2534 5126
8:30 98 126 224 20:30 25 25 50 15:00 15:15 15:15
8:45 42 85 127 20:45 23 38 61 479 464 938
9:00 42 45 87 21:00 27 22 49 0.793 0.725 0.754
9:15 47 45 92 21:15 13 21 34
9:30 56 47 103 21:30 15 18 33 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 44 61 105 21:45 17 18 35 713 776 1489
10:00 51 43 94 22:00 11 15 26 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 59 52 111 22:15 17 16 33 558 525 1083
10:30 51 48 99 22:30 12 9 21 0.742 0.944 0.828
10:45 55 47 102 22:45 68 14
11:00 71 58 129 23:00 9 10 19 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 54 54 108 23:15 10 7 17 633 566 1199
11:30 48 57 105 23:30 10 6 16 17:00 16:00 16:00
11:45 63 54 117 23:45 66 12 324 302 611
TOTALS 1481 1639 0 0 3120 TOTALS 2592 2534 0 0 5126 0.794 0.868 0.926 SPLIT % 47% 53% 0% 0% 38% SPLIT % 51% 49% 0% 0% 62%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
#14 ‐ O'Hara Ave Bet Laurel Rd & W Cypress Rd
4/4/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB
159
Segment #15
Street: O'Hara Avenue
Limits: Laurel Road to Neroly Road
Direction: NB/SB
Date /Location of Survey 4/5/2024
Posted Speed Limit (mph) 40
# Speed Data Collected 125
85th Percentile (mph) 46
10 mph Pace 35-44
Percent in Pace 75%
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 9,605
Length of Segment (mi.) 1.00
Street Classification Major Arterial
Date Range Covered Jan 1, 2018 - Dec 31, 2022
Total Accidents 15
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) 0.86
Statewide Average Accident Rate 1.11
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Approved and Authorized for release by the City of Oakley:

Signed:

Title:

Signed: Anna Vickroy, PE, TE
Title: Senior Transportation Engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants §22358.6(a) - Round the speed limit to the nearest 5-mph increment from the 85th percentile speed: 46 --> 45 §22358.6(b) - Lower the speed limit an additional 5 mph from the rounded speed limit if the speed limit was initially rounded down from the 85th percentile speed: 45 --> 40
Speed Limit Change? No
Existing Speed Limit: 40 Recommended Speed Limit: 40
C. Collision History
D. Roadway Conditions
Residential (single-family homes), institutional (high school), and open space (park, agriculture, vacant lot) land uses.

An undivided 3-lane major arterial. Double yellow lines and raised median serve as median. Concrete sidewalks present consistently along westerly side and intermittently along easterly side. Class II bike lanes present consistently along westerly side and intermittently along easterly side. Signals present at intersections with Neroly Rd., Carpenter Rd., and Laurel Rd. Side street stop control present at remaining intersections. Left-turn lane pockets present at approaches to intersections with Neroly Rd., Carpenter Rd., and Laurel Rd. Right-turn lane pockets present at approaches to intersections at Brownstone Rd. and Laurel Rd. Marked crosswalks present at intersections with Neroly Rd., Carpenter Rd., and Laurel Rd. No on-street parking present. No school zone is present. No horizontal curves present. Gentle vertical curves throughout segment. Medium driveway density on both sides.

Factors
A. Prevailing Speed Data
B. Traffic Factors
This survey conforms to Section 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic. 160
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 1
29 30
31 1
32 33 2
34 3
35 4
36 6
37 9
38 9
39 10
40 13
41 9
42 15
43 11
44 8
45 4
46 6
47 7
48 4
49 3
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 125 28 - 49 41 mph 46 mph 35 - 44 94 75% 5% / 7 20% / 24

SPEED PARAMETERS
#15 - O'Hara Ave Bet Neroly Rd & Laurel Rd
City of Oakley
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:15-12:00
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-015
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
161
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 1
29 30
31 1
32 33 1
34 2
35 3
36 3
37 3
38 5
39 7
40 6
41 4
42 7
43 5
44 4
45 2
46 2
47 3
48 2
49 2
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 63 28 - 49 40 mph 45 mph 35 - 44 47 75% 7% / 5 18% / 11

SPEED PARAMETERS
#15 - O'Hara Ave Bet Neroly Rd & Laurel Rd
City of Oakley
Northbound Spot Speeds
11:15-12:00
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-015
02468
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
162
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 1
34 1
35 1
36 3
37 6
38 4
39 3
40 7
41 5
42 8
43 6
44 4
45 2
46 4
47 4
48 2
49 1
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 62 33 - 49 41 mph 46 mph 37 - 46 49 79% 9% / 6 12% / 7

SPEED PARAMETERS
#15 - O'Hara Ave Bet Neroly Rd & Laurel Rd
City of Oakley
Southbound Spot Speeds
11:15-12:00
4/5/2024
Project #: 24-080067-015
0 2 4 6 8 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
163
Day: Thursday City: Oakley
Date: Project #: CA24_080066_015
NB SB EB WB Total
4,570 5,035 0 0 9,605

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 99 18 12:00 59 71 130 00:00 01:00 21 20 41
0:15 11 2 12:15 59 59 118 01:00 02:00 18 7 25
0:30 77 14 12:30 54 51 105 02:00 03:00 8 11 19
0:45 43 7 12:45 59 56 115 03:00 04:00 17 9 26
1:00 40 4 13:00 66 59 125 04:00 05:00 29 25 54
1:15 85 13 13:15 110 66 176 05:00 06:00 33 57 90
1:30 41 5 13:30 63 86 149 06:00 07:00 83 90 173
1:45 21 3 13:45 109 77 186 07:00 08:00 210 363 573
2:00 12 3 14:00 88 85 173 08:00 09:00 421 693 1114
2:15 34 7 14:15 79 81 160 09:00 10:00 200 270 470
2:30 23 5 14:30 92 104 196 10:00 11:00 237 209 446
2:45 22 4 14:45 64 104 168 11:00 12:00 233 219 452
3:00 62 8 15:00 69 106 175 12:00 13:00 231 237 468
3:15 24 6 15:15 101 153 254 13:00 14:00 348 288 636
3:30 41 5 15:30 151 165 316 14:00 15:00 323 374 697
3:45 52 7 15:45 100 139 239 15:00 16:00 421 563 984
4:00 67 13 16:00 101 94 195 16:00 17:00 400 405 805
4:15 54 9 16:15 103 92 195 17:00 18:00 456 369 825
4:30 78 15 16:30 93 109 202 18:00 19:00 286 303 589
4:45 11 6 17 16:45 103 110 213 19:00 20:00 194 210 404
5:00 48 12 17:00 112 77 189 20:00 21:00 192 161 353
5:15 10 15 25 17:15 104 93 197 21:00 22:00 110 86 196
5:30 10 12 22 17:30 129 114 243 22:00 23:00 58 47 105
5:45 9 22 31 17:45 111 85 196 23:00 00:00 41 19 60
6:00 21 15 36 18:00 75 92 167
6:15 17 21 38 18:15 70 78 148 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 15 20 35 18:30 75 58 133 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 30 34 64 18:45 66 75 141 1510 1973 3483
7:00 27 34 61 19:00 43 62 105 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 42 59 101 19:15 66 67 133 439 749 1188
7:30 63 115 178 19:30 50 31 81 0.819 0.764 0.809
7:45 78 155 233 19:45 35 50 85
8:00 122 245 367 20:00 56 44 100 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 134 219 353 20:15 46 41 87 3060 3062 6122
8:30 105 130 235 20:30 52 34 86 17:00 15:00 15:15
8:45 60 99 159 20:45 38 42 80 456 563 1004
9:00 59 64 123 21:00 31 28 59 0.884 0.853 0.794
9:15 51 58 109 21:15 27 22 49
9:30 48 77 125 21:30 29 16 45 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 42 71 113 21:45 23 20 43 631 1056 1687
10:00 72 48 120 22:00 18 10 28 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 51 63 114 22:15 16 12 28 439 749 1188
10:30 56 46 102 22:30 15 15 30 0.819 0.764 0.809
10:45 58 52 110 22:45 9 10 19
11:00 55 55 110 23:00 11 5 16 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 51 61 112 23:15 13 6 19 856 774 1630
11:30 59 58 117 23:30 12 5 17 17:00 16:00 16:45
11:45 68 45 113 23:45 53 8 456 405 842
TOTALS 1510 1973 0 0 3483 TOTALS 3060 3062 0 0 6122 0.884 0.920 0.866 SPLIT % 43% 57% 0% 0% 36% SPLIT % 50% 50% 0% 0% 64%
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
#15 ‐ O'Hara Ave Bet Neroly Rd & Laurel Rd
4/4/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB
164
Segment #16
Street: Rose Avenue
Limits: Laurel Road to Simoni Ranch Road
Direction: NB/SB
Date /Location of Survey 4/9/2024
Posted Speed Limit (mph) 40
# Speed Data Collected 125
85th Percentile (mph) 42
10 mph Pace 34-43
Percent in Pace 74%
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,754
Length of Segment (mi.) 0.50
Street Classification Collector
Date Range Covered Jan 1, 2018 - Dec 31, 2022
Total Accidents 1
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) 0.62
Statewide Average Accident Rate 1.11
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Approved and Authorized for release by the City of Oakley:

Signed:

Title:

Signed: Anna Vickroy, PE, TE
Title: Senior Transportation Engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants §22358.6(a) - Round the speed limit to the nearest 5-mph increment from the 85th percentile speed: 42 --> 40 Speed Limit Change? No
Existing Speed Limit: 40 Recommended Speed Limit: 40
C. Collision History
D. Roadway Conditions
Residential (single-family homes) and open space (vacant lot) land uses.

An undivided 2-lane collector. Double yellow lines and quadraple yellow lines serve as median. Intermittent concrete sidewalks on both sides, though more consistent on easterly side than westerly side. Class II bike lanes present on both sides. Signal present at intersection with Laurel Rd. All-way stop control at intersections with Longhorn Wy./Barn Dance Wy. and Carpenter Rd./Simoni Ranch Rd. Side street stop control present at remaining intersections. Left-turn lane pockets present at approaches to intersections with Laurel Rd. and Stone Mountain Dr. Marked crosswalks present at intersections with Carpenter Rd. and Laurel Rd. No on-street parking present. No school zone is present. No horizontal curves present. Gentle vertical curves throughout segment. Low driveway density on both sides.

Factors
A. Prevailing Speed Data
B. Traffic Factors
This survey conforms to Section 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic. 165
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 1
28 1
29 2
30 3
31 5
32 7
33 4
34 10
35 5
36 7
37 13
38 9
39 10
40 11
41 7
42 13
43 7
44 4
45 46 1
47 2
48 1
49 1
50 1
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 125 27 - 50 38 mph 42 mph 34 - 43 92 74% 18% / 23 8% / 10

SPEED PARAMETERS
#16 - Rose Ave Bet Laurel Rd & Simoni Ranch Rd
City of Oakley
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:25-12:50
4/9/2024
Project #: 24-080067-016
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
166
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 1
28 1
29 2
30 1
31 3
32 6
33 2
34 4
35 2
36 1
37 6
38 5
39 8
40 6
41 5
42 8
43 1
44 2
45 46 1
47 2
48 49 1
50 1
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 69 27 - 50 39 mph 42 mph 33 - 42 47 68% 20% / 14 12% / 8

SPEED PARAMETERS
#16 - Rose Ave Bet Laurel Rd & Simoni Ranch Rd
City of Oakley
Northbound Spot Speeds
11:25-12:50
4/9/2024
Project #: 24-080067-016
0 2 4 6 8 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
167
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30 2
31 2
32 1
33 2
34 6
35 3
36 6
37 7
38 4
39 2
40 5
41 2
42 5
43 6
44 2
45 46
47 48 1
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 56 30 - 48 37 mph 43 mph 34 - 43 46 82% 12% / 7 6% / 3

SPEED PARAMETERS
#16 - Rose Ave Bet Laurel Rd & Simoni Ranch Rd
City of Oakley
Southbound Spot Speeds
11:25-12:50
4/9/2024
Project #: 24-080067-016
02468
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
168
Day: Thursday City: Oakley
Date: Project #: CA24_080066_016
NB SB EB WB Total
840 914 0 0 1,754

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 01 1 12:00 68 14 00:00 01:00 13 4
0:15 00 0 12:15 9 10 19 01:00 02:00 10 1
0:30 12 3 12:30 5 11 16 02:00 03:00 12 3
0:45 00 0 12:45 18 12 30 03:00 04:00 04 4
1:00 00 0 13:00 11 18 29 04:00 05:00 45 9
1:15 10 1 13:15 19 16 35 05:00 06:00 37 10
1:30 00 0 13:30 20 10 30 06:00 07:00 13 15 28
1:45 00 0 13:45 21 11 32 07:00 08:00 36 87 123
2:00 12 3 14:00 7 22 29 08:00 09:00 90 148 238
2:15 00 0 14:15 7 21 28 09:00 10:00 44 43 87
2:30 00 0 14:30 20 18 38 10:00 11:00 34 31 65
2:45 00 0 14:45 17 23 40 11:00 12:00 33 42 75
3:00 01 1 15:00 21 19 40 12:00 13:00 38 41 79
3:15 01 1 15:15 24 34 58 13:00 14:00 71 55 126
3:30 02 2 15:30 46 31 77 14:00 15:00 51 84 135
3:45 00 0 15:45 19 18 37 15:00 16:00 110 102 212
4:00 03 3 16:00 12 13 25 16:00 17:00 55 56 111
4:15 10 1 16:15 14 15 29 17:00 18:00 98 65 163
4:30 31 4 16:30 13 13 26 18:00 19:00 45 44 89
4:45 01 1 16:45 16 15 31 19:00 20:00 27 31 58
5:00 21 3 17:00 17 12 29 20:00 21:00 43 24 67
5:15 03 3 17:15 21 23 44 21:00 22:00 23 13 36
5:30 12 3 17:30 29 14 43 22:00 23:00 17 8 25
5:45 01 1 17:45 31 16 47 23:00 00:00 24 6
6:00 53 8 18:00 7 17 24
6:15 52 7 18:15 14 10 24 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 26 8 18:30 12 9 21 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 14 5 18:45 12 8 20 260 387 647
7:00 6 12 18 19:00 7 10 17 7:45 7:30 7:45
7:15 2 14 16 19:15 77 14 103 185 286
7:30 10 14 24 19:30 69 15 0.780 0.593 0.701
7:45 18 47 65 19:45 75 12
8:00 24 78 102 20:00 10 7 17 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 33 46 79 20:15 95 14 580 527 1107
8:30 28 12 40 20:30 16 6 22 15:00 14:45 14:45
8:45 5 12 17 20:45 86 14 110 107 215
9:00 11 13 24 21:00 63 9 0.598 0.787 0.698
9:15 10 12 22 21:15 54 9
9:30 15 11 26 21:30 54 9 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 87 15 21:45 72 9 126 235 361
10:00 10 2 12 22:00 51 6 7:45 7:30 7:45
10:15 9 10 19 22:15 44 8 103 185 286
10:30 65 11 22:30 63 9 0.780 0.593 0.701
10:45 9 14 23 22:45 20 2
11:00 9 13 22 23:00 11 2 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 9 13 22 23:15 11 2 153 121 274
11:30 66 12 23:30 01 1 17:00 17:00 17:00
11:45 9 10 19 23:45 01 1 98 65 163
TOTALS 260 387 0 0 647 TOTALS 580 527 0 0 1107 0.790 0.707 0.867 SPLIT % 40% 60% 0% 0% 37% SPLIT % 52% 48% 0% 0% 63%
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
#16 ‐ Rose Ave Bet Laurel Rd & Simoni Ranch Rd
4/4/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB
169
Segment #17
Street: Sellers Avenue
Limits: East Cypress Road to Delta Road
Direction: NB/SB
Date /Location of Survey 4/9/2024
Posted Speed Limit (mph) 50
# Speed Data Collected 120
85th Percentile (mph) 47
10 mph Pace 38-47
Percent in Pace 74%
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,466
Length of Segment (mi.) 1.51
Street Classification Minor Arterial
Date Range Covered Jan 1, 2018 - Dec 31, 2022
Total Accidents 5
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM) 0.33
Statewide Average Accident Rate 1.11
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Approved and Authorized for release by the City of Oakley: