Agenda packet — Ontario City Council, May 16, 2023 (part 1 of 5)

CITY OF ONTARIO
Regular City Council/Housing Authority
Meeting
MAY 16, 2023
City Hall
303 East B Street, Ontario, CA 91764

MAYOR PAUL S. LEON • MAYOR PRO TEM DEBRA DORST-PORADA
COUNCIL MEMBERS ALAN D. WAPNER, JIM W. BOWMAN AND RUBEN VALENCIA CITY CLERK SHEILA MAUTZ • TREASURER JAMES R. MILHISER
CITY MANAGER SCOTT OCHOA • CITY ATTORNEY RUBEN DURAN

WELCOME TO A MEETING OF THE ONTARIO CITY COUNCIL

All documents for public review are on ﬁle with the Records Management/City Clerk's Department located at 303 East B Street, Ontario, CA 91764.

Anyone wishing to speak in person during public comment or on a particular item will be required to ﬁll out a blue slip. Blue slips must be turned in prior to public comment beginning or before an agenda item is taken up. The Clerk will not accept blue slips after that time. To comment by email, submit your comments no later than 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting by emailing your name, agenda item you are commenting on and your comments to
[email protected].

All
comments received by the deadline will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration before action is taken on the matter and will be entered into the record.

Comments will be limited to 3 minutes. Speakers will be alerted when they have 1 minute remaining and when their time is up. Speakers are then to return to their seats and no further comments will be permitted.

In accordance with State Law, remarks during public comment are to be limited to subjects within Council's jurisdiction. Remarks on other agenda items will be limited to those items.

Remarks from those seated or standing in the back of the chamber will not permitted. All those wishing to speak including Council and Staff need to be recognized by the Chair before speaking.

CITY OF ONTARIO Regular City Council/Housing Authority Meeting CITY HALL 303 EAST B STREET, ONTARIO CA 91764 • www.OntarioCA.gov 1

ACCOMODATIONS

If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's oﬃce at 909-395-2009. Notiﬁcation of 48 hours prior to the meeting will help the City make reasonable arrangements. Equipment for the hearing impaired is available in the Records Management Office.

ORDER OF BUSINESS

The regular City Council and Housing Authority meeting begins with Closed Session and Closed Session Comment at
5:30 p.m.
, Public Comment at 6:30 p.m. immediately followed by the Regular Meeting and Public Hearings. No agenda item will be introduced for consideration after 10:00 p.m. except by majority vote of the City Council.

CALL TO ORDER
(OPEN SESSION)

ROLL CALL

Dorst-Porada, Wapner, Bowman, Valencia, Mayor/Chairman Leon

CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENT

The Closed Session Public Comment portion of the Council/Housing Authority meeting is limited to a maximum of 3 minutes for each speaker and comments will be limited to matters appearing on the Closed Session. Additional opportunities for further Public Comment will be given during and at the end of the meeting.

CLOSED SESSION
GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: APN: 1011-221-19; 1522 West Mission Boulevard; City/Authority negotiator: Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: The Ramanbhai G. Patel and Manjulaben R. Patel Revocable Living Trust; Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment

GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: APN: 0110-321-43; 2151 East Convention Center Way; City/Authority negotiator: Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: ONT Gateway LLC; Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment

GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: APNs: 0218-101-03, 0218-101-04, 0218-101-05, 0218-101-06; Southeast Corner Riverside Drive and Vineyard Avenue; City/Authority negotiator: Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: JCLIN INVESTMENT LP; Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment CITY OF ONTARIO Regular City Council/Housing Authority Meeting CITY HALL 303 EAST B STREET, ONTARIO CA 91764 • www.OntarioCA.gov 2

ATTACHMENT:

20230516 Closed Session

GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: APNs: 0218-111-08, 0218-111-11, 0218-111-12, 0218-111-49, 0218-111-50; Southeast Corner Riverside Drive and Ontario Avenue; City/Authority negotiator: Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: 15 Dairy River LLC; Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment

GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: APN: 0218-111-06; Southeast Corner Riverside Drive and Ontario Avenue; City/Authority negotiator: Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: Sanchez Family Trust; Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment

GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: APN: 0218-111-05; Southeast Corner Riverside Drive and Ontario Avenue; City/Authority negotiator: Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: Raymundo Flores; Under negotiation:

Price and terms of payment

GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: APNs: 0218-111-04, 0218-111-45; Southeast Corner Riverside Drive and Ontario Avenue; City/Authority negotiator: Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: Ontario WF Farm LLC; Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment

GC 54956.9(d)(4), CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION One (1) Case

GC 54957.6, CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATIONS: City Negotiator: City Manager or his designees; Bargaining Units: Ontario Police Officers Association, Ontario Police Management Group, Ontario Professional Fireﬁghters Association Local 1430, Ontario Fire Management Group, Department Heads, Executives, AFSCME Local 3061, Teamsters Local 1932, Association of Management Employees, Confidential Group, and Part-time Employees.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor pro Tem Dorst-Porada

INVOCATION
Pastor Delfa Tangonan Nava, Jesus is Lord Church Ontario

REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney

CITY OF ONTARIO Regular City Council/Housing Authority Meeting CITY HALL 303 EAST B STREET, ONTARIO CA 91764 • www.OntarioCA.gov 3

SPECIAL CEREMONIES

TWENTY-THIRD ANNUAL MODEL COLONY AWARDS
That the City Council present the 2023 “Model Colony” Awards for Historic Preservation.

RECOGNITION OF "HISTORIC PRESERVATION MONTH" IN THE CITY OF ONTARIO That the City Council Proclaim the Month of May 2023 as “Historic Preservation Month” in the City of Ontario.

PROCLAMATION OF MAY 20, 2023 AS KIDS TO PARKS DAY
That the City Council proclaim May 20, 2023 as Kids to Parks Day in the City of Ontario.

PUBLIC COMMENTS 6:30 P.M.

The Public Comment portion of the Council/Housing Authority meeting is limited to 30 minutes with each speaker given a maximum of 3 minutes. An opportunity for further Public Comment may be given at the end of the meeting. Under provisions of the Brown Act, Council is prohibited from taking action on oral requests.

To comment by email, submit your comments by email no later than 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting by emailing your name, agenda item you are commenting on and your comment to [email protected]
. All Comments received by the deadline will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration before action is taken on the matter and entered into the record. As previously noted -- if you wish to address the Council, fill out one of the blue slips at the rear of the chambers and give it to the City Clerk.

AGENDA REVIEW/ANNOUNCEMENTS

The City Manager will go over all updated materials and correspondence received after the Agenda was distributed to ensure Council Members have received them. He will also make any necessary recommendations regarding Agenda modiﬁcations or announcements regarding Agenda items to be considered.

CONSENT CALENDAR

All matters listed under CONSENT CALENDAR will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below – there will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the time Council votes on them, unless a member of the Council requests a speciﬁc item be removed from the Consent Calendar for a separate vote.

CITY OF ONTARIO Regular City Council/Housing Authority Meeting CITY HALL 303 EAST B STREET, ONTARIO CA 91764 • www.OntarioCA.gov 4

1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

ATTACHMENT:

20230418 Minutes (Not official until approved)

2. BILLS & PAYROLL

3. A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION OF TWO EASEMENTS FOR SANITARY

SEWER AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTH

BON VIEW AVENUE AND EAST ONTARIO BOULEVARD

ATTACHMENT:

Vacation 305 & 306^01 EXH 1

ATTACHMENT:

Vacation 305 & 306^02^RESO^RM

ATTACHMENT:

Vacation 305 & 306^03 RESO EXH A - D

4. AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR REMOTE ACCELA

SUPPORT WITH TRUEPOINT SOLUTIONS, LLC

5. AN AMENDMENT TO THE GOODS AND SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF

ASPHALT MATERIALS
Each member of the public wishing to address the City Council on items listed on the Consent Calendar will be given a total of 3 minutes.

Minutes for the regular meetings of the City Council and Housing Authority of April 18, 2023 and approving same as on file in the Records Management Department.

Bills April 14, 2023 through April 27, 2023, and Payroll April 9, 2023 through April 22, 2023 when audited by the Finance Committee.

That the City Council adopt a Resolution ordering the summary vacation of two easements for sanitary sewer and public utility purposes located at the southeast corner of South Bon View Avenue and East Ontario Boulevard.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA,

ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION OF TWO EASEMENTS FOR SANITARY SEWER

AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTH BON VIEW AVENUE AND EAST ONTARIO BOULEVARD.

That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an Amendment to the current Agreement (on-ﬁle with the Records Management Department) with TruePoint Solutions, LLC., Loomis, California, for on-going service and support of the Accela Civic Platform for a total not to exceed amount of $650,000 and extend the term for two years.

That the City Council authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Goods and Services Agreement (on file with the Records Management) with All American Asphalt of Corona, California, to procure asphalt materials in an amount not-to-exceed $965,970.

CITY OF ONTARIO Regular City Council/Housing Authority Meeting CITY HALL 303 EAST B STREET, ONTARIO CA 91764 • www.OntarioCA.gov 5

6. AMENDMENTS TO THE EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENTS WITH MCLAUGHLIN WASTE EQUIPMENT, INC. FOR COMMERCIAL BIN CONTAINERS AND ROLL-OFF CONTAINERS AND PARTS

7. ACCEPTANCE OF A WRITTEN PETITION TO CREATE A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT;

AND A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ESTABLISH CITY OF ONTARIO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 61 (MERRILL COMMERCE CENTER SERVICES) AND TO AUTHORIZE

THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES

ATTACHMENT:

CFD 61 Merrill Commerce Center^01^Resolution Intention^RM

ATTACHMENT:

CFD 61 Merrill Commerce Center^01A Map, EXH A

ATTACHMENT:

CFD 61 Merrill Commerce Center^01B RMA, EXH C

8. AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HINDERLITER DE

LLAMAS & ASSOCIATES (HDL) FOR SALES TAX CONSULTING AND REVENUE RECOVERY That the City Council take the following actions:

A
.

Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 4 to the existing Equipment Purchase Agreement (on ﬁle in the Records Management Department) with McLaughlin Waste Equipment, Inc. of Galt, California, for the procurement of commercial bin containers, exercising the option of a one-year extension of the agreement and extending the term of the agreement to June 30, 2024 in an amount not-to-exceed $1,000,000; and
B
.

Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 2 to the existing Equipment Purchase Agreement (on ﬁle in the Records Management Department) with McLaughlin Waste Equipment, Inc. of Galt, California, for the procurement of roll-oﬀ containers and parts, exercising the option of a one-year extension of the agreement and extending the term of the agreement to June 30, 2024 in an amount not-to-exceed $400,000.

That the City Council consider and:

A
.

Accept a written petition (on ﬁle with the Records Management Department) from Prologis LP, Research ("Landowner"), to create a Community Facilities District ("CFD") and to waive certain procedural matters, under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982; and
B
.

Adopt a Resolution of Intention to establish City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 61 (Merrill Commerce Center Services), authorize the associated levy of special taxes therein; and set a public hearing for the formation of the CFD as part of the regularly scheduled City Council meeting on Tuesday, June 20, 2023.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, OF

INTENTION TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED TO BE NAMED CITY OF ONTARIO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 61 (MERRILL COMMERCE CENTER SERVICES) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX.

CITY OF ONTARIO Regular City Council/Housing Authority Meeting CITY HALL 303 EAST B STREET, ONTARIO CA 91764 • www.OntarioCA.gov 6

SERVICES AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HDL

COREN & CONE FOR PROPERTY TAX SERVICES

9. A GRANT APPLICATION FROM THE ADMINISTRATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING FOR THE

ACTIVE SENIOR ON THE GO PROGRAM

10. FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET UPDATE REPORT

ATTACHMENT:

FY 2022-23 Third Quarter Budget Update Report_EXHIBIT A.pdf

ATTACHMENT:

Clerk-Treasurer Salary^RESO^RM

ATTACHMENT:

Part Time Grade Table_EXHIBIT B
That the City Council authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the following amendments:

A
.

An Amendment with Hinderliter de Llamas & Associates adding indirect cost recovery to the scope of work, increasing compensation for a new not-to-exceed amount of $1,700,000 with an expiration of June 30, 2025, and an option to add two (2) additional one-year terms to the agreement; and
B
.

An Amendment for the HdL Coren & Cone agreement to increase compensation for a new not-to-exceed amount of $172,605 with an expiration of June 30, 2025, and an option to add two (2) additional one-year terms to the agreement.

That the City Council authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for and accept a 12-month grant in the amount of $439,094 from the Administration for Community Living (ACL), a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, for the Recreation & Community Services Department's Active Seniors on the Go program.

A
.

That the City Council approve the budget adjustments and recommendations as presented in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Third Quarter Budget Update Report (Exhibit A), and adopt a Resolution pertaining to the City Clerk and Treasurer salary; B
.

That the City Council approve a revised Salary Schedule (Exhibit B) and for Unrepresented Part-time employees and authorize the City Manager to approve staﬃng programs and the assigned salary grade placement for each Part-Time classiﬁcation with the recommendation of the Human Resources / Risk Management agency.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA,

SETTING THE COMPENSATION OF THE CITY CLERK AND CITY TREASURER AND RESCINDING PREVIOUS RESOLUTION NO. 2014-016.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, if you challenge the City’s zoning, planning or any other decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to the public hearing. Affidavits of posting compliance, for all items below, are on file with the Records Management Department.

CITY OF ONTARIO Regular City Council/Housing Authority Meeting CITY HALL 303 EAST B STREET, ONTARIO CA 91764 • www.OntarioCA.gov 7

11. A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO UPDATE THE CITY'S

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (DIF) MASTER FACILITIES PLAN

ATTACHMENT:

Development Impact Fee DIF Master Facilities Plan 01^FINAL RESO^RM

ATTACHMENT:

DIF Master Facilities Plan Report^02 EXHIBIT "A"

12. A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER FILE NO. PUD22-005, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR A 2.38-ACRE PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED AT

THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF EUCLID

AVENUE AND D STREET, BORDERED BY E STREET ON THE NORTH AND LEMON AVENUE ON

THE EAST

ATTACHMENT:

20230516 File No. PUD22-005^01^PC Backup.pdf

ATTACHMENT:

File No. PUD22-005 ORD D Block PUD^02^RM

ATTACHMENT:

File No. PUD22-005 PUD ORD^03 ATTACH A

13. A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (FILE NO. PDA21-005) BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO AND

GROVE LAND VENTURE LLC, TO ESTABLISH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 20161 (FILE NO. PMTT20-011), A 159.95 ACRE PROPERTY

BORDERED BY EUCALYPTUS AVENUE TO THE NORTH, BON VIEW AVENUE TO THE WEST,

MERRILL AVENUE TO THE SOUTH, AND GROVE AVENUE TO THE EAST, WITHIN THE

INDUSTRIAL AND BUSINESS PARK LAND USE DISTRICTS OF THE SOUTH ONTARIO LOGISTICS CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN (FILE NO. PSP19-001) AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNS: 1054-071-01, 1054-071-02, 1054-081-03, 1054-091-01, 1054-091- 02, 1054-101-01, 1054-101-02, 1054-231-01, 1054-231-02, 1054-241-01, 1054-241-02, 1054- That the City Council consider and adopt a Resolution to update the City's Development Impact Fees (DIF) Master Facilities Plan.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA,

ADOPTING THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (DIF) MASTER FACILITIES PLAN UPDATE.

That the City Council introduce and waive further reading of an Ordinance approving File No.

PUD22-005, the D Block Planned Unit Development, establishing development standards and design guidelines to facilitate a commercial and residential mixed-use development located at the northeast corner of Euclid Avenue and D Street.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FILE NO. PUD22-005, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO ESTABLISH

DEVELOPMENT AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR

2.38-ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF EUCLID AVENUE

AND D STREET, BORDERED BY E STREET ON THE NORTH AND LEMON AVENUE ON THE EAST WITHIN THE LUA-1 (EUCLID AVENUE ENTERTAINMENT) OF THE MU-1 (DOWNTOWN MIXED USE) ZONING DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNS: 1048-363-05, 1048-363-04, 1048-363-03 AND 1048-363-02.

CITY OF ONTARIO Regular City Council/Housing Authority Meeting CITY HALL 303 EAST B STREET, ONTARIO CA 91764 • www.OntarioCA.gov 8 311-01, 1054-311-02, 1054-321-01 AND 1054-321-02)

ATTACHMENT:

File No. PDA21-005 Grove Land Venture LLC^01 EXH A&B

ATTACHMENT:

20230516 PDA21-005^PC Backup.pdf

ATTACHMENT:

File No. PDA21-005 Grove Land Venture LLC^02^ORD^RM

ATTACHMENT:

File No. PDA21-005 Grove Land Venture LLC^03 DEV AGR

14. A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTH ONTARIO LOGISTICS CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN (FILE NO. PSPA22-008), TO REMOVE A 71.6-ACRE PORTION OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN, IN CONJUNCTION WITH A ZONE CHANGE (FILE NO. PZC23-001) LOCATED

SOUTH OF EUCALYPTUS AVENUE, NORTH OF MERRILL AVENUE, WEST OF BON VIEW

AVENUE, AND EAST OF CAMPUS AVENUE
That the City Council introduce and waive further reading of an Ordinance approving a Development Agreement (File No. PDA21-005) between the City of Ontario and Grove Land Venture LLC, to establish the terms and conditions associated with Tentative Parcel Map 20161 (File No. PMTT20-011), a 159.95-acre property bordered by Eucalyptus Avenue to the north, Bon View Avenue to the west, Merrill Avenue to the south, and Grove Avenue to the east, within the Industrial and Business Park land use districts of the South Ontario Logistics Center Specific Plan.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FILE NO. PDA21-005, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE

CITY OF ONTARIO AND GROVE LAND VENTURE LLC, TO ESTABLISH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 20161 (FILE NO.

PMTT20-011), A 159.95 ACRE PROPERTY BORDERED BY EUCALYPTUS AVENUE TO

THE NORTH, BON VIEW AVENUE TO THE WEST, MERRILL AVENUE TO THE SOUTH,

AND GROVE AVENUE TO THE EAST, WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL AND BUSINESS PARK

LAND USE DISTRICTS OF THE SOUTH ONTARIO LOGISTICS CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN (FILE NO. PSP19-001) AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNS: 1054- 071-01, 1054-071-02, 1054-081-03, 1054-091-01, 1054-091-02, 1054-101-01, 1054- 101-02, 1054-231-01, 1054-231-02, 1054-241-01, 1054-241-02, 1054-311-01, 1054- 311-02, 1054-321-01 AND 1054-321-02.

That the City Council consider the following:

A
.

Adopt a Resolution approving File No. PSPA22-008, an Amendment to the South Ontario Logistics Center Speciﬁc Plan, including map and textual changes, to remove 71.6 acres from the Specific Plan; and
B
.

Introduce and waive further reading of an Ordinance adopting File No. PZC23-001, a Zone Change to establish the SP/AG (Speciﬁc Plan/Agriculture Overlay) zoning district on the Project site.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FILE NO. PSPA22-008, AMENDING THE SOUTH ONTARIO LOGISTICS

CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN, INCLUDING MAP AND TEXTUAL CHANGES TO REMOVE A

71.6-ACRE PORTION OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF EUCALYPTUS CITY OF ONTARIO Regular City Council/Housing Authority Meeting CITY HALL 303 EAST B STREET, ONTARIO CA 91764 • www.OntarioCA.gov 9

ATTACHMENT:

20230516 File Nos. PSPA22-008_PZC23-001^PC Backup.pdf

ATTACHMENT:

File Nos. PSPA22-008 and PZC23-001 SOLC SPA^01 RESO SPA^RM

ATTACHMENT:

File Nos. PSPA22-008 and PZC23-001 SOLC SPA^02 Reso Attach A - SPA Redlines

ATTACHMENT:

File Nos. PSPA22-008 and PZC23-001 SOLC SPA^03 Reso Attach B - PLN COA

ATTACHMENT:

File Nos. PSPA22-008 and PZC23-001 SOLC SPA^04^Ord and Attach A - Zone Change EXH^RM

ATTACHMENT:

File Nos. PSPA22-008 and PZC23-001 SOLC SPA^05 Ord Attach B - PLN COA

AVENUE, NORTH OF MERRILL AVENUE, WEST OF BON VIEW AVENUE, AND EAST OF

CAMPUS AVENUE FROM THE SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNS: 1054-051-01, 1054-051-02, 1054-061-01, 1054-061-02, 1054-251- 01, 1054-251-02, 1054-301-01 AND 1054-301-02.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FILE NO. PZC23-001, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH THE SP(AG) (SPECIFIC PLAN/AGRICULTURE OVERLAY) ZONING DISTRICT ON THE 71.6-ACRE PROJECT SITE

GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF EUCALYPTUS AVENUE, NORTH OF MERRILL

AVENUE, WEST OF BON VIEW AVENUE, AND EAST OF CAMPUS AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNS: 1054-051-01, 1054-051-02, 1054- 061-01, 1054-061-02, 1054-251-01, 1054-251-02, 1054-301-01 AND 1054-301-02.

STAFF MATTERS

City Manager Ochoa

COUNCIL MATTERS
Boards & Commissions Appointments

Mayor Leon
Mayor pro Tem Dorst-Porada
Council Member Wapner
Council Member Bowman
Council Member Valencia

ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF ONTARIO Regular City Council/Housing Authority Meeting CITY HALL 303 EAST B STREET, ONTARIO CA 91764 • www.OntarioCA.gov 10 1 of 5

CITY OF ONTARIO

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Council // Housing Authority // Other // (GC 54957.1) May 16, 2023
ROLL CALL: Dorst-Porada _, Wapner _, Bowman _, Valencia _, Mayor / Chairman Leon _.

STAFF: City Manager / Executive Director __, City Attorney __ In attendance: Dorst-Porada _, Wapner _, Bowman _, Valencia _, Mayor / Chairman Leon _.  GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: APN: 1011-221-19; 1522 West Mission Boulevard; City/Authority negotiator: Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: The Ramanbhai G. Patel and Manjulaben R.

Patel Revocable Living Trust; Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment No Reportable Action Continue Approved
/ / / / / /
Disposition: _________________________________________________________________ In attendance: Dorst-Porada _, Wapner _, Bowman _, Valencia _, Mayor / Chairman Leon _.  GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: APN: 0110-321-43; 2151 East Convention Center Way; City/Authority negotiator:

Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: ONT Gateway LLC; Under negotiation:

Price and terms of payment
No Reportable Action Continue Approved
/ / / / / /
Disposition: _________________________________________________________________ 11 2 of 5

CITY OF ONTARIO

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Council // Housing Authority // Other // (GC 54957.1) May 16, 2023
(continued)
In attendance: Dorst-Porada _, Wapner _, Bowman _, Valencia _, Mayor / Chairman Leon _.  GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: APNs: 0218-101-03, 0218-101-04, 0218-101-05, 0218-101-06; Southeast Corner Riverside Drive and Vineyard Avenue; City/Authority negotiator: Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: JCLIN INVESTMENT LP; Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment No Reportable Action Continue Approved
/ / / / / /
Disposition: _________________________________________________________________ In attendance: Dorst-Porada _, Wapner _, Bowman _, Valencia _, Mayor / Chairman Leon _.  GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: APNs: 0218-111-08, 0218-111-11, 0218-111-12, 0218-111-49, 0218-111-50; Southeast Corner Riverside Drive and Ontario Avenue; City/Authority negotiator: Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: 15 Dairy River LLC; Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment
No Reportable Action Continue Approved
/ / / / / /
Disposition: _________________________________________________________________ 12 3 of 5

CITY OF ONTARIO

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Council // Housing Authority // Other // (GC 54957.1) May 16, 2023
(continued)
In attendance: Dorst-Porada _, Wapner _, Bowman _, Valencia _, Mayor / Chairman Leon _.  GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: APN: 0218-111-06; Southeast Corner Riverside Drive and Ontario Avenue; City/Authority negotiator: Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: Sanchez Family Trust; Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment
No Reportable Action Continue Approved
/ / / / / /
Disposition: _________________________________________________________________ In attendance: Dorst-Porada _, Wapner _, Bowman _, Valencia _, Mayor / Chairman Leon _.  GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: APN: 0218-111-05; Southeast Corner Riverside Drive and Ontario Avenue; City/Authority negotiator: Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: Raymundo Flores; Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment
No Reportable Action Continue Approved
/ / / / / /
Disposition: _________________________________________________________________ 13 4 of 5

CITY OF ONTARIO

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Council // Housing Authority // Other // (GC 54957.1) May 16, 2023
(continued)
In attendance: Dorst-Porada _, Wapner _, Bowman _, Valencia _, Mayor / Chairman Leon _.  GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: APNs: 0218-111-04, 0218-111-45; Southeast Corner Riverside Drive and Ontario Avenue; City/Authority negotiator: Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: Ontario WF Farm LLC; Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment No Reportable Action Continue Approved
/ / / / / /
Disposition: _________________________________________________________________ In attendance: Dorst-Porada _, Wapner _, Bowman _, Valencia _, Mayor / Chairman Leon _.  GC 54956.9(d)(4), CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION One (1) Case
No Reportable Action Continue Approved
/ / / / / /
Disposition: _________________________________________________________________ 14 5 of 5

CITY OF ONTARIO

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Council // Housing Authority // Other // (GC 54957.1) May 16, 2023
(continued)
In attendance: Dorst-Porada _, Wapner _, Bowman _, Valencia _, Mayor / Chairman Leon _.  GC 54957.6, CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATIONS: City Negotiator: City Manager or his designees; Bargaining Units: Ontario Police Officers Association, Ontario Police Management Group, Ontario Professional Firefighters Association Local 1430, Ontario Fire Management Group, Department Heads, Executives, AFSCME Local 3061, Teamsters Local 1932, Association of Management Employees, Confidential Group, and Part-time Employees.

No Reportable Action Continue Approved
/ / / / / /
Disposition: _________________________________________________________________ Reported by:
___________________________________________
City Attorney / City Manager / Executive Director
15 Department: Planning
Prepared By: Elly Antuna
Staff Member Presenting:

Scott Murphy, Executive Director Community
Development
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No:

SUBJECT:

TWENTY-THIRD ANNUAL MODEL COLONY AWARDS

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
May 16, 2023
SECTION:

SPECIAL CEREMONIES

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council present the 2023 “Model Colony” Awards for Historic Preservation.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Focus Resources in Ontario's Commercial and Residential Neighborhoods Encourage, Provide or Support Enhanced Recreational, Educational, Cultural and Healthy City Programs, Policies and Activities
FISCAL IMPACT:

There is not a direct fiscal impact associated with this action.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

The Planning Commission, acting as the Historic Preservation Commission, developed the “Model Colony” Awards program to recognize outstanding achievement in the preservation of Ontario’s historic resources.

The “Model Colony” Awards are presented by the City Council each spring to coincide with National Historic Preservation Month. On May 16, 2023, the City Council proclaimed the month of May 2023 as "Historic Preservation Month" in the City of Ontario. Five awards will be presented in the categories of preservation. On April 25, 2023, the Planning/Historic Preservation Commission considered each category and chose the following recipients:

Restoration Award:

For achievement in the restoration of a historic resource.

Recipient:

Peter H. Vandenberg House,
Bryan and Monica Sinsabaugh
Award of Merit:

For achievement in the ongoing preservation of a historic resource.

Recipient:

Otis L. Harper House,
Jennifer Adams and Mathew Wedel
Rehabilitation Award:

For achievement in the rehabilitation of a historic resource.

Recipient:

Citrus Motors Building,
Damien and Mia Melle
16 Founder's Heritage Award and Rehabilitation Award:

For achievement in the ongoing
stewardship and rehabilitation of a historic resource.

Recipient:

Colonel John P. Robertson House, John and Diane Aylyng
George Chaﬀey Memorial Award:

For distinguished leadership in the preservation of Ontario’s cultural heritage.

Recipient:

Ontario Heritage, Petrina Delman, President
17 Department: Planning
Prepared By: Elly Antuna
Staff Member Presenting:

Scott Murphy, Executive Director Community
Development
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No:

SUBJECT:

RECOGNITION OF "HISTORIC PRESERVATION MONTH" IN THE CITY OF ONTARIO

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
May 16, 2023
SECTION:

SPECIAL CEREMONIES

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council Proclaim the Month of May 2023 as “Historic Preservation Month” in the City of Ontario.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

There is not a direct fiscal impact associated with this action.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

Since 1971, the National Trust for Historic Preservation has conducted nationwide campaigns to celebrate historical places and showcase preservation activities. In 2005, the National Trust began designating the month of May as Historic Preservation Month. The goals of Historic Preservation Month are to promote historical places for the purpose of instilling national and community pride, promoting heritage tourism, and showcasing the social and economic beneﬁts of historic preservation. This year, the City is celebrating historic preservation month by continuing the “Model Colony” Awards program and presentation.

The theme for the Model Colony Awards this year will be, “Placekeeping/Placemaking,” which highlights how utilizing existing historic community resources grows their role and strength in the community. Placekeeping is about engaging the community to recognize those places that preserve Ontario’s stories and culture. Ontario’s history remains one of its greatest assets, and through the community’s ongoing stewardship of the inherited built environment, these places continue to make and keep Ontario special. In keeping with this year’s theme, Model Colony Award winners will display their award recognition with a yard sign on their properties to showcase these historic places. Additionally, a collection of videos and photographs provided by the community has been prepared to showcase places that are important to the community. This social media campaign encouraged the community to submit photos or videos of places that preserve Ontario’s story and culture. This collection of photographs and videos gives insight into what the community believes is important and is another way to preserve Ontario’s heritage. 18 Department: Recreation
Prepared By: Danielle Guevara
Staff Member Presenting:

Nicholas S. Gonzalez, Recreation & Community
Services Director
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No:

SUBJECT:

PROCLAMATION OF MAY 20, 2023 AS KIDS TO PARKS DAY

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
May 16, 2023
SECTION:

SPECIAL CEREMONIES

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council proclaim May 20, 2023 as Kids to Parks Day in the City of Ontario.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Encourage, Provide or Support Enhanced Recreational, Educational, Cultural and Healthy City Programs, Policies and Activities
FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact associated with the approval of this report.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

Kids to Parks Day is a national day of outdoor play celebrated annually on the third Saturday of May in partnership with the National Park Trust. The National Park Trust is a 501(c)3 non-proﬁt organization with a mission to “preserve parks today and create park stewards for tomorrow.” This year marks the 13th anniversary of Kids to Parks Day. The day empowers kids and encourages families to get outdoors and visit local parks, public lands, and waters. The goal is to broaden children’s appreciation for nature and the outdoors.

In Ontario, the Recreation & Community Services Department will celebrate Kids to Parks Day by providing specialized programming at ﬁve park locations. These programs provide a great opportunity for Ontario residents to get outside and create fun family experiences. Residents are encouraged to visit multiple park locations throughout the City to learn about the City’s park system and enjoy park amenities and services.

The following parks will have specialized programming in celebration of Kids to Parks Day on Saturday, May 20, 2023:

Celebration Park North: Located at 4980 S. Celebration Avenue, activities will be held from 9 AM – 11 AM
Vineyard Park: Located at 1400 E. Sixth Street, activities will be held from 10 AM – 12 PM 19 Anthony Munoz Hall of Fame Park: Located at 1240 W. Fourth Street, activities will be held from 11 AM – 1 PM
Ontario Town Square: Located at 224 N. Euclid Avenue, activities will be held from 12 PM – 2 PM
De Anza Park: Located at 1405 S. Fern Avenue, activities will be held from 1 PM – 3 PM Participants are encouraged to visit each park location to receive a specialized Ontario mascot Croc pin. Residents can ﬁnd more information about this event and all other programs, classes, and activities by following the Recreation & Community Services Department on social media or by visiting www.OntarioCA.gov/Recreation.
20 ONTARIO CITY COUNCIL/

ONTARIO HOUSING AUTHORITY

MINUTES
APRIL 18, 2023
(Not Official Until Approved)
(Not Official Until Approved)

JOINT MEETINGS
The regular meetings of the Ontario City Council and the Housing Authority were held on Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at Ontario City Hall, 303 E. B Street Ontario, California.

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Leon called the joint meetings to order at 5:34 p.m.

ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Mayor/Chairman: Paul S. Leon
Mayor pro Tem/Vice Chair: Debra Dorst-Porada
Council/Authority Members: Alan D. Wapner, Jim W. Bowman and Ruben Valencia
ABSENT: Council/Authority Members: None.

Also present were City Manager / Executive Director Scott Ochoa, City Attorney/Legal Counsel Ruben Duran, and City Clerk / Secretary Sheila Mautz.

CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Leon inquired whether persons were present who wished to speak to the Closed Session items. Assistant City Clerk Isbell announced one written communication from Mr.

Email regarding the existing litigation, Ruben Valencia v. City of Ontario. Hearing no one present to speak, City Attorney Duran announced the matters for discussion as listed on the agenda. City Council recessed to Closed Session at 5:33 p.m., with Council Member Valencia recused from the first matter. Council Member Valencia joined Closed Session at 6:25 p.m.
 GC 54656.9(d)(1), CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL, EXISTING LITIGATION Ruben Valencia v. City of Ontario, Case No. CIVSB2302751  GC 54957.6, CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATIONS: City Negotiator: City Manager or his designees; Bargaining Units: Ontario Police Officers Association, Ontario Police Management Group, Ontario Professional Firefighters Association Local 1430, Ontario Fire Management Group, Department Heads, Executives, AFSCME Local 3061, Teamsters Local 1932, Association of Management Employees, Confidential Group, and Part-time Employees. 21 Ontario City Council/Ontario Housing
Regular Meeting Minutes – April 18, 2023

Page 2 of 13 ends

 GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: APN: 1011-382-09; 801-805 South Mountain Avenue; City/Authority Negotiator: Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: Peter Stuart Dejager and Michelle Julie Dejager; Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment  GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: APN: 1011-382-65; 1045 West Mission Boulevard; City/Authority Negotiator: Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: Kalpesh P. Solanki; Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment.
 GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: APN: 1048-562-06; 212-218 North Palm Avenue; City/Authority Negotiator:

Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: Kenneth Hale; Under negotiation:

Price and terms of payment
 GC 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: APN: 1048-562-07; 210 North Palm Avenue and 222 West B Street; City/Authority Negotiator: Scott Ochoa or his designee; Negotiating parties: Pan de Vida Spanish Ministry of Ontario; Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment.

OPEN MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
Mayor Leon reconvened the meetings at 6:37 p.m. for the regular session.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Valencia.

INVOCATION
The invocation was led by Pastor Victor Enoch, Victory Outreach Ontario Bilingual Church.

REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Duran announced the existing litigation Ruben Valencia v. City of Ontario was the only matter discussed in Closed Session, with Council Member Valencia recused from the discussion and there was no reportable action.

SPECIAL CEREMONIES

CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH PROCLAMATION
Mayor Leon presented The Children’s Network with a proclamation proclaiming the month of April as Child Abuse Prevention Month. Accepting on their behalf was Officer Wendy Alvarez who thanked Mayor Leon and the City Council.
22 Ontario City Council/Ontario Housing
Regular Meeting Minutes – April 18, 2023

Page 3 of 13 ends

COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROPERTY RECOGNITION PROGRAM AWARDS The City Council presented the Community Improvement Property Recognition Awards as follows:

Outstanding Property Award (Owner-Occupied): Shawn and Erica Rumenapp Outstanding Property Award (Rental Property): H&R Holdings, LLC.

Property Beautification Award (Owner Occupied): Clinton and Stephanie Bailey Property Beautification Award (Rental Property): Maryanne Larios Osborne & Nicholas Reed Mayor Leon recessed the meetings at 6:51 p.m. and reconvened at 6:54 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Assistant City Clerk Isbell announced there were two written public comments:

Chris Robles, alleged criminal activity at Cardenas Market parking lot.

Jesus Medrano, in opposition of warehouses.

Mayor Leon called upon the first speaker:

Enrique, thanked the Mayor and Council for supporting the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce and announced upcoming events.

Richard Gentry, expressed concerns regarding recreational vehicles storage prices.

Maria Galvan, expressed concerns with the Inland Valley Humane Society.

Victoria Pacheco, representing the Shine Smart Program shared information with Council regarding the program and encouraged residents to sign up for solar installation.

Randy Bekendam, stated warehouses are supported by the consumer.

Nadya Behna , representative of Assemblymember Rodriguez’s office announced upcoming events in South Ontario and a scholarship program.

Jimena Estrada, expressed concerns regarding homelessness.

Andrew Gerardo, representing the D’Andre Lampkin Foundation announced upcoming events.

AGENDA REVIEW/ANNOUNCEMENTS
City Manager Ochoa announced updated exhibits to the Resolution being considered under Agenda Item No. 4. The update reflected payments received from property owners up to 9:00 a.m. on Monday, April 17, 2023. The updated materials also reflected a revised and reduced amount for assessments totaling $74,505.84 related to 56 parcels. Since the public agenda was posted, $55,029.35 was collected for 17 parcels. 23 Ontario City Council/Ontario Housing
Regular Meeting Minutes – April 18, 2023

Page 4 of 13 ends

CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Bowman seconded by Mayor pro Tem Dorst-Porada and carried by a unanimous vote 5-0, to approve the Consent Calendar as presented.

1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes for the regular meetings of the City Council and Housing Authority of March 21, 2023, and approving same as on file in the Records Management Department.

2. BILLS & PAYROLL
Bills March 17, 2023 through March 30, 2023 in the amount of $17,015,705.84, and Payroll March 12, 2023 through March 25, 2023 in the amount of $4,542,451.50, when audited by the Finance Committee.

3. AN AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL
The City Council approved Amendment No. 3 to increase the contracted dollar amount with Environmental Logistics, Inc. of Bloomington, California by $406,700, which would increase the total not-to-exceed to $733,598.

4. A RESOLUTION FOR PLACEMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON THE SAN

BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ROLLS
The City Council adopted a Resolution for recovery of fees and costs incurred in abating property and dangerous building violations, as well as administrative citations and civil penalties associated with property maintenance violations and placing assessments on the San Bernardino County Tax Rolls.

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-023 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A REPORT REQUESTING THE

PLACEMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PROPERTY TAX BILLS FOR

CIVIL PENALTIES OR RECOVERY OF COSTS INCURRED FOR ABATEMENT OF VIOLATIONS OF CITY CODES AND ORDINANCES.

5. AWARD BID FOR A MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR STAND-BY

GENERATOR MAINTENANCE SERVICES AND REPAIRS
The City Council awarded Bid No. 1602 and authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute a three-year Maintenance Services Agreement with Global Power Group, Inc. of Lakeside, California, in the amount of $375,600 plus a 24 Ontario City Council/Ontario Housing
Regular Meeting Minutes – April 18, 2023

Page 5 of 13 ends

contingency of $150,000, for a total not-to-exceed amount of $525,600; and authorized the City Manager to extend the agreement for up to two (2) one-year options.

6. AMENDMENTS TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICE AGREEMENTS FOR

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR SPECIFIC CITY-OWNED

PROPERTY, PARKWAYS AND LANDSCAPE MEDIANS THROUGHOUT THE CITY
The City Council took the following actions:

A. Authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 7, adding one site to the Housing and Gas Tax Funded Sites, to the Maintenance Services Agreement (on file with Records Management) with Brightview Landscape Services, Inc. of Upland, California, for Contract No. PM1617-7.

B. Authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 5, adding four new sites in the Former Redevelopment Properties, to the Maintenance Services Agreement (on file with Records Management) with Brightview Landscape Services, Inc. of Upland, California for Contract No.

PM1617-10.

C. Authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 6, adding two new sites and the turf removal project at Fire Stations 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, to the Maintenance Services Agreement and (on file with Records Management) with Brightview Landscape Services, Inc. of Upland, California, for Contract No. PM1617-9 for the landscape maintenance services of certain parkways, fire stations, and landscape medians throughout the City.

7. AN AMENDMENT TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR QUIET HOMES AND ONTARIO

RANCH WEED ABATEMENT
The City Council took the following actions:

A. Authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 2, adding eight newly acquired sites at Quiet Home and exercising the optional two (2) one-year extensions, to the existing Maintenance Services Agreement with DW Landscape, Inc. of Upland, California, for Contract No. PM1718-7.

B. Authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 1, adding one newly acquired area for Ontario Ranch Weed Abatement and exercising the optional two (2) one-year extensions, to the existing Maintenance Services Agreement with DW Landscape, Inc. of Upland, California, for Contract No. PM1920-7.
25 Ontario City Council/Ontario Housing
Regular Meeting Minutes – April 18, 2023

Page 6 of 13 ends

8. AN AMENDMENT TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR PARKWAYS IN THE ONTARIO

RANCH AREA
The City Council authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 5, adding five newly acquired parkway planter areas at Park Place located in the Ontario Ranch area and exercising the optional two (2) one-year extensions to the existing Maintenance Services Agreement with Merchants Landscape Services, Inc. of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Contract No.

PM1920-6.

9. AN AMENDMENT TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR CELEBRATION NORTH AND

SOUTH PARKS
The City Council authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 1, exercising the optional two (2) one-year extensions, to the existing Maintenance Services Agreement with Priority Landscape Services of Brea, California, for landscape maintenance services at Celebration Park North and South for Contract No. PM1718-6.

10. AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUEL
The City Council approved and authorized the City Manager or his designee to enter into a five-year cooperative purchase and delivery of gasoline and diesel fuel with Nuckles Oil Company, DBA Merit Oil Company, of Bloomington, California, consistent with the terms and conditions of the County of San Bernardino Awarded Contract dated June 15, 2022.

11. AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH SAFE USA, INC. FOR CRACK SEALING SERVICES
The City Council approved and authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 1, exercising the optional two (2) one-year extensions, to the Construction Agreement with Safe USA, Inc. located in Ontario, California, for Contract No. SM 1920-5.

12. AN AMENDMENT TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR

CITYWIDE STREET SWEEPING SERVICES
The City Council authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 5, adding new streets in Ontario Ranch, to the Maintenance Services Agreement with Sweeping Corp of America, of Gardena, California, for Contract No. SM1617-2.
26 Ontario City Council/Ontario Housing
Regular Meeting Minutes – April 18, 2023

Page 7 of 13 ends

13. AN AMENDMENT TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR

CITYWIDE TREE MAINTENANCE SERVICES
The City Council authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 13, exercising the final one (1) year term extension and adding additional citywide tree maintenance services to the Maintenance Services Agreement with West Coast Arborists of Anaheim, California, for Contract No.

PM-WCA1415.

14. AN AMENDMENT TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR PARKWAYS AND MEDIANS IN

THE ONTARIO RANCH AREA
The City Council authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 3, adding five additional sites in the Community Facilities District (CFD) located in the Ontario Ranch area, to the Maintenance Services Agreement (on file with the Records Management) with Greentech Landscape, Inc. of Whittier, California, for Contract No. PM2021-2.

15. AUTHORIZE VENDORS FOR FLEET VEHICLE EQUIPPING
The City Council approved 10-8 Retrofit of Ontario, California, as an authorized vendor for current and future purchases and installation of electronics and equipment associated with the routine replacement of City fleet vehicles.

16. A DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CREDIT AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (FILE NO. PDIF22-003) BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO AND DUKE REALTY

STATE STREET LP, FOR FACILITY CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT PLAN (FILE NO. PDEV22-010), LOCATED AT 316 SOUTH BON

VIEW AVENUE, WITHIN THE IG (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL) ZONING DISTRICT The City Council approved the Development Impact Fee Credit and Reimbursement Agreement (File No. PDIF22-003) between the City of Ontario and Duke Realty State Street LP, for the facility construction associated with Development Plan (File No.

PDEV22-010), located at 316 South Bon View Avenue, within the IG (General Industrial) zoning district, and authorized the City Manager to execute the Agreement.

17. AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE DE ANZA COMMUNITY

CENTER ROOF RESTORATION PROJECT
The City Council took the following actions:

A. Authorized the City Manager or his designee to complete and execute Construction Contract No. D&C22-013 with Rite-Way Roofing Corporation located in Fontana, California, for the De Anza Community Center Roof Restoration Project in an amount of $420,858;
27 Ontario City Council/Ontario Housing
Regular Meeting Minutes – April 18, 2023

Page 8 of 13 ends

B. Authorized a 10% contingency of $42,086 for a not-to-exceed contract value of $462,944 to address any unforeseen issues that may arise during construction; and
C. Authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute all documents required for the completion of the project including, but not limited to, contracts, agreements, assessments, easements, reduction of retention accounts, and filing a notice of completion at the conclusion of all construction related activities.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

18. A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDING THE ZONING DESIGNATIONS ON 107 PROPERTIES LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE CITY
The City Council:

A. Adopted a Resolution approving the use of an Addendum to The Ontario Plan 2050 (TOP 2050) Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2021070364);
B. Introduced and waived of further reading of an Ordinance approving a Zone Change (File No. PZC22-001) amending the zoning designations on 107 properties located citywide to make the O cial Zoning Map consistent with TOP 2050 Land Use Plan (Exhibit LU-01); and
C. Reconsidered the zone change for Area A1 (APNS: 1008-551-01, 1008-551-13, 1008-551-11, and 1008-561-06) from LDR-5 (Low Density Residential) zoning district to MDR-18 (Medium Density Residential) zoning district and Area C2 (APNS: 1010-491-02, 1010-491-16, 1048-604-13, 1048- 604-14, and 1048-604-15) from MDR-25 (Medium-High Density Residential) zoning district to HDR-45 (High Density Residential) zoning district.

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-024 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO THE ONTARIO PLAN 2050 CERTIFIED SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2021070364), FOR WHICH AN INITIAL

STUDY WAS PREPARED, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AS AMENDED, FOR FILE NO. PZC22-001.

ORDINANCE NO. 3245 (FIRST READING) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FILE NO.

PZC22-001, A CITY INITIATED REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATIONS ON 107 PROPERTIES LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO

MAKE THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP CONSISTENT WITH THE ONTARIO PLAN 2050 POLICY PLAN (GENERAL PLAN) LAND USE PLAN (EXHIBIT LU-01), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APNS: 1008-522-04, 1008-522-01, 1008-522-02, 1008-522-03, 1008-513-16, 1008-551-01, 1008-551-13, 1008-551-12, 1008-551-11, 1008-561-06, 1008-551-07, 1008-441-01, 1048-525-12, 1049-094-07, 1049-094-10, 1049-094-08, 1049-094-09, 1048-525-14, 1048-525-13, 1048-525-15, 1048-523-15, 1048-523-16, 1048-523-18, 1048-522-08, 1048-522-09, 28 Ontario City Council/Ontario Housing
Regular Meeting Minutes – April 18, 2023

Page 9 of 13 ends

1048-522-10, 1048-522-11, 1048-524-14, 1048-524-15, 1048-524-16, 1048-524-17, 1048-525-16, 1048-525-17, 1048-525-18, 1048-525-19, 1048-525-20, 1048-523-17, 1049-094-04, 1049-094-14, 1049-094-02, 1049-094-01, 1049-093-10, 1049-093-09, 1049-093-07, 1049-093-06, 1049-093-04, 1049-093-03, 1049-093-02, 1049-093-01, 1049-091-04, 1049-091-03, 1049-091-02, 1049-091-01, 1049-094-13, 1049-094-05, 1049-094-11, 1049-094-06, 1049-093-08, 1049-093-05, 1010-502-08, 1010-502-09, 1048-604-13, 1048-604-14, 1048-604-15, 1010-491-16, 1010-491-02, 1010-491-03, 0210-551-02, 0210-551-03, 1050-272-20, 1050-272-01, 1050-272-21, 1050-284-01, 1051-221-07, 1051-222-13, 1051-222-12, 1051-222-01, 1051-221-08, 1051-222-11, 1051-221-09, 1051-222-10, 1051-221-10, 1051-222-09, 1051-221-11, 1051-222-08, 1051-221-12, 1051-221-13, 1051-221-14, 1051-221-16, 1051-221-15, 1051-221-20, 1051-271-66, 1051-271-67, 1051-271-06, 1048-556-05, 1048-556-04, 1048-556-03, 1048-556-02, 1048-556-01, 1048-556-14, 0110-071-01, 0110-061-01, 0110-071-06, 0110-071-02, 0110-072-11, 0110-072-10, AND 0110-071-07.

Notice of public hearing was duly given and affidavits of compliance are on file in the Records Management Department. There were three written communications with suggested recommendations from Ronnie Gonzalez, Nancy Sansonetti, and Myra Rios.

Mayor Leon opened the public hearing and inquired if anyone was interested in speaking to the item.

Myra Rios, spoke in opposition to the item.

Matt Ryan, spoke in opposition to the item.

Executive Director of Community Development Scott Murphy gave a presentation on the matter.

Mayor recessed the meetings recessed at 7:34 p.m. and Mayor pro Tem Dorst-Porada reconvened at 7:39 p.m.

City Attorney Duran announced that Mayor Leon realized he lives close to some of the locations being considered. Although the law does not require that the Mayor recuse himself he has decided to do so out of an abundance of caution.

Mayor pro Tem Dorst-Porada continued the hearing. With no more comment cards and no one else wishing to speak, Mayor pro Tem Dorst-Porada closed the public hearing and opened the item for Council discussion.

The City Council discussed the Item and came to the consensus that A1 would remain low density and C2 would remain medium density.

MOTION: Moved by Mayor pro Tem Dorst-Porada, seconded by Council Member Bowman and carried by unanimous 4-0 vote, with Mayor Leon recused, to adopt Resolution No. 2023-024 and introduce Ordinance No. 3245 and send A1 and C2 back to the Planning commission.
29 Ontario City Council/Ontario Housing
Regular Meeting Minutes – April 18, 2023

Page 10 of 13 ends

19. A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A

DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT REVISING AND CLARIFYING CERTAIN

PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO DEVELOPMENT CODE
The City Council introduced and waived further reading of the Ordinance approving File No. PDCA23-001, a Development Code Amendment revising and clarifying certain provisions of Chapters 1.0 (Development Code Enactment and General Provisions), 2.0 (Administration and Procedures), 5.0 (Zoning and Land Use), 6.0 (Development and Subdivision Regulations), 8.0 (Sign Regulations), and 9.0 (Definitions and Glossary) of the City of Ontario Development Code.

ORDINANCE NO. 3246 (FIRST READING) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FILE NO.

PDCA23-001, A DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT REVISING AND
CLARIFYING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF CHAPTERS 2.0 (ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES), 5.0 (ZONING AND LAND USE), 6.0 (DEVELOPMENT AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS), 8.0 (SIGN REGULATIONS), AND 9.0 (DEFINITIONS AND GLOSSARY) OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.

Notice of public hearing was duly given and affidavits of compliance are on file in the Records Management Department. There were no written communications.

Mayor Leon opened the public hearing and inquired if anyone was interested in speaking to the item. Hearing no one, Mayor Leon closed the public hearing and opened the item for Council discussion.

MOTION: Moved by Council Member Bowman, seconded by Council Member Wapner and carried by unanimous 5-0 vote, to introduce Ordinance No. 3246.

20. A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE

FORMATION OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 64 (SUNSET RANCH); ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS; AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE LEVYING

SPECIAL TAXES
The City Council:

A. Adopted a Resolution of Formation of Community Facilities District No. 64 (Sunset Ranch), authorizing the levy of special taxes within the community facilities district, and establishing an appropriations limit for the community facilities district;
B. Adopted a Resolution deeming it necessary to incur bonded indebtedness within Community Facilities District No. 64 (Sunset Ranch); C. Adopted a Resolution calling a special election for City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 64 (Sunset Ranch);
30 Ontario City Council/Ontario Housing
Regular Meeting Minutes – April 18, 2023

Page 11 of 13 ends

D. Adopted a Resolution declaring the results of the special election and directing the recording of a Notice of Special Tax Lien; E. Introduced and waived further reading of an ordinance levying special taxes within City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 64 (Sunset Ranch); and
F. Adopted a Resolution authorizing the execution and delivery of an acquisition and funding agreement with KB Home Coastal Inc., a California corporation.

Notice of public hearing was duly given and affidavits of compliance are on file in the Records Management Department. There were no written communications.

Mayor Leon opened the public hearing and inquired if anyone was interested in speaking to the item. Hearing no one, Mayor Leon closed the public hearing and opened the item for Council discussion.

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-025 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, OF FORMATION OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 64 (SUNSET RANCH), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX.

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, DEEMING IT NECESSARY TO INCUR

BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN CITY OF ONTARIO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 64 (SUNSET RANCH).

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-027 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION FOR CITY OF ONTARIO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 64 (SUNSET RANCH).

MOTION: Moved by Council Member Bowman, seconded by Mayor pro Tem Dorst-Porada and carried by unanimous 5-0 vote, to adopt Resolution Nos. 2023-025, 2023-026, and 2023-027.

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL

ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN FOR CITY OF ONTARIO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 64 (SUNSET RANCH).

City Clerk Mautz opened the ballot and announced one ballot in support.

MOTION: Moved by Council Member Bowman, seconded by Mayor pro Tem Dorst-Porada and carried by unanimous 5-0 vote, to adopt Resolution Nos 2023-028.

ORDINANCE NO. 3247 (FIRST READING) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITY DISTRICT NO. 64 (SUNSET RANCH). 31 Ontario City Council/Ontario Housing
Regular Meeting Minutes – April 18, 2023

Page 12 of 13 ends

MOTION: Moved by Mayor pro Tem Dorst-Porada, seconded by Council Member Bowman and carried by unanimous 5-0 vote, to introduce Ordinance No. 3247.

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-029 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND

DELIVERY OF AN ACQUISITION AND FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH KB HOME COASTAL INC.

MOTION: Moved by Mayor pro Tem Dorst-Porada, seconded by Council Member Bowman and carried by unanimous 5-0 vote, to adopt Resolution No. 2023-029.

STAFF MATTERS
City Manager Ochoa made no comments.

COUNCIL MATTERS

BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
Board and Commission Appointments
Mayor Leon noted applications were still being reviewed and anticipated making appointments at a future meeting.

Council Member Bowman had no comments.

Council Member Valencia had no comments.

Council Member Wapner announced he would be absent for the month of May.

Mayor pro Tem Dorst-Porada encouraged residents to donate to local charities.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Leon adjourned the meetings of the Joint Agencies at 8:09 p.m. and announced the next regular meeting on May 2, 2023.

Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK/SECRETARY
32 Ontario City Council/Ontario Housing
Regular Meeting Minutes – April 18, 2023

Page 13 of 13 ends

APPROVED:
_____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR/CHAIRMAN
33 Department: Engineering
Prepared By: Angela Truong
Staff Member Presenting:

Scott Murphy, Executive Director Community
Development
Reviewed By: Raymond Lee, Khoi Do
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 3
SUBJECT:

A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION OF TWO EASEMENTS FOR

SANITARY SEWER AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST

CORNER OF SOUTH BON VIEW AVENUE AND EAST ONTARIO BOULEVARD

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
May 16, 2023
SECTION:

CONSENT CALENDAR

RECOMMENDATION:

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Invest in the Growth and Evolution of the City's Economy Focus Resources in Ontario's Commercial and Residential Neighborhoods Invest in the City's Infrastructure (Water, Streets, Sewers, Parks, Storm Drains and Public Facilities)
FISCAL IMPACT:

There is not a direct ﬁscal impact associated with this action. The City did not pay to acquire the subject easements. The Developer has paid the applicable processing fees to defray any City cost to process this request.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

The applicant, EPD Solutions, has requested that the City vacate two existing easements, as shown on Exhibit 1, for sanitary sewer and public utility purposes to facilitate the development of the area. The easements are not needed for any present or future public sewer or public utility purposes. There are currently no existing public utilities within the easements and the easements are determined to be excess.

Section 8333(c) of the California Streets and Highways Code authorizes the City to summarily vacate (by Resolution with no public hearing) a public service easement that has been superseded by relocation or determined to be excess, and there are no public facilities located within the easement.

This summary vacation meets the California Government Code, Streets and Highways Code, Ontario Municipal Code, and has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 34 PARCEL 18.09 AC.PARCEL 21.90 AC.APN 1049-181-10APN 1049-181-12APN 1049-181-07APN 1049-181-09 APN1049-193-01&02E. ONTARIO BLVD.S. BON VIEW AVE.CALIFORNIA ST.PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPL6'CITY OF ONTARIOSANITARY SEWER & PUBLICUTILITY EASEMENTBK 2374, PG 394, O.R.TO BE VACATED6'12'CITY OF ONTARIOSANITARY SEWER & PUBLICUTILITY EASEMENTBK 4715, PG 52, O.R.TO BE VACATED

VICINITY MAPSITE
735 Carnegie Drive Suite 280San Bernardino CA 92408-3588 909-335-6116stantec.comWPT - BON VIEW AVE.ONTARIO, CALIFORNIAEXHIBIT 1PUBLIC EASEMENT VACATIONEXHIBIT 1PUBLIC EASEMENT VACATION LEGEND
35 RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,

CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION OF TWO

EASEMENTS FOR SANITARY SEWER AND PUBLIC UTILITY

PURPOSES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTH BON
VIEW AVENUE AND EAST ONTARIO BOULEVARD.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, pursuant to Division 9, Part 3, Chapter 4, of the Streets and Highways Code, may summarily vacate an easement under certain conditions specified therein; and WHEREAS, an easement for sanitary sewer and public utility purposes located approximately 33 feet south of East Ontario Boulevard and approximately 690 feet east of South Bon View Avenue, shown on a portion of Certificate of Compliance No. CC15- 006, in the City of Ontario, County of San Diego, is not needed for any present or future public utility or other municipal purposes and is determined to be excess; and WHEREAS, an easement for sanitary sewer and public utility purposes located approximately 300 feet north of California Street and approximately 415 feet east of South Bon View Avenue, as shown on a portion of Certificate of Compliance No. CC15-006, in the City of Ontario, County of San Diego, is not needed for any present or future public utility or other municipal purposes and is determined to be excess; and WHEREAS, Section 8333(c) of the California Streets and Highways Code authorizes the City to summarily vacate (by Resolution with no public hearing) a public service easement that has been superseded by relocation or determined to be excess and there are no other public utilities located within the easement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Ontario as follows:

SECTION 1. That the above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2. That title to the above-described said properties, more specifically described in Exhibit “A” and Exhibit “C” and depicted on Exhibit “B” and Exhibit “D” attached hereto, shall be vacated.

SECTION 3. That the City Clerk of the City of Ontario, California, shall cause a copy of this Resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California.

The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.
36 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of May 2023. _____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP

CITY ATTORNEY
37 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )

CITY OF ONTARIO )
I, SHEILA MAUTZ, City Clerk of the City of Ontario, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No. 2023- was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario at their regular meeting held May 16, 2023 by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
The foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2023- duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held May 16, 2023. _____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
38 EXHIBIT “A”

VACATION OF SANITARY SEWER & PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT

\\Us0328-ppfss01\shared_projects\2042639000\geomatics\legals Page 1 of 1

THAT PORTION OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. CC15-006, IN THE CITY OF

ONTARIO, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RE-RECORDED JULY 22, 2015 AS DOC# 2015-0310739 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

ALL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO EASEMENT FOR SANITARY SEWER AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AS DESCRIBED IN A DOCUMENT RECORDED MARCH 17, 1949 IN BOOK 2374, PAGE 394 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER.

ALSO AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.

SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS, AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD, IF ANY.

PREPARED BY: STANTEC CONSULTING
UNDER THE DIRECTION OF:

_______________________
MINH A. LE, P.L.S. 8543

MARCH 9, 2023
J.N. 2042 639000

APPROVED
03/23/2023 10:36:45 AM
39 735 Carnegie Drive Suite 280San Bernardino CA 92408-3588 909-335-6116stantec.com

APPROVED
03/23/2023 10:36:45 AM
40 EXHIBIT “A”

VACATION OF SANITARY SEWER & PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT

\\Us0328-ppfss01\shared_projects\2042639000\geomatics\legals Page 1 of 1

THAT PORTION OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. CC15-006, IN THE CITY OF

ONTARIO, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RE-RECORDED JULY 22, 2015 AS DOC# 2015-0310739 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

ALL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO EASEMENT FOR SANITARY SEWER AND PUBLIC UTILITIES PURPOSES AS DESCRIBED IN A DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 27, 1959 IN BOOK 4715, PAGE 52 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER.

ALSO AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.

SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS, AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD, IF ANY.

PREPARED BY: STANTEC CONSULTING
UNDER THE DIRECTION OF:

_______________________
MINH A. LE, P.L.S. 8543

MARCH 9, 2023
J.N. 2042 639000

APPROVED
03/23/2023 10:36:45 AM
41 735 Carnegie Drive Suite 280San Bernardino CA 92408-3588 909-335-6116stantec.com

APPROVED
03/23/2023 10:36:45 AM
42 Department: Information Technology
Prepared By: Samantha Robles
Staff Member Presenting:

Colin Fernandes, Executive Director Information
Technology
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 4
SUBJECT:

AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR REMOTE

ACCELA SUPPORT WITH TRUEPOINT SOLUTIONS, LLC

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
May 16, 2023
SECTION:

CONSENT CALENDAR

RECOMMENDATION:

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Operate in a Businesslike Manner
FISCAL IMPACT:

The Fiscal Year 2022-23 Adopted Budget includes appropriations from the Information Technology Fund for Information Technology Agency consulting services. The proposed Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement increases the authorized contract amount by $250,000 for a not to exceed contract amount of $650,000 and extends the Agreement an additional two years from July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2025, for a total term of six-years. The ﬁxed billing rates speciﬁed in the current Agreement will determine the amount charged for services and reﬂect the actual services provided. If approved, appropriations will be added to the future years' budgets consistent with the annual adoption process.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

In 2009, the City ﬁrst contracted with TruePoint Solutions, LLC, to support the Permits Plus to Accela implementation. TruePoint Solutions, LLC provides specialized expertise and support of the Community Development Agency's land management system, Accela, on an as-needed basis. Support from the TruePoint Solutions, LLC allows the City to automate processes, improve self-service options for Residents and Developers, and ensure that Staﬀ correctly implement changes to the City land management ordinances in the land management system. Staﬀ requests City Council approval to extend the Agreement to June 30, 2025, and to increase funding in Fiscal Years 2023-24 and 2024-25 for a not to exceed contract amount of $650,000.
43 Department: Parks & Maintenance
Prepared By: Alfredo Banuelos
Staff Member Presenting:

Tito Haes, Executive Director Public Works
Reviewed By: Bonnie Tam, Andrea Ampig
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 5
SUBJECT:

AN AMENDMENT TO THE GOODS AND SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE

PROCUREMENT OF ASPHALT MATERIALS

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
May 16, 2023
SECTION:

CONSENT CALENDAR

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Goods and Services Agreement (on ﬁle with the Records Management) with All American Asphalt of Corona, California, to procure asphalt materials in an amount not-to- exceed $965,970.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Invest in the City's Infrastructure (Water, Streets, Sewers, Parks, Storm Drains and Public Facilities)
Ensure the Development of a Well Planned, Balanced, and Self-Sustaining Community in Ontario Ranch
FISCAL IMPACT:

The recommended Amendment No. 1 for $160,000 increases the authorized contract amount from $805,970, to a total not-to-exceed contract amount of $965,970. The Fiscal Year 2022-23 Adopted Budget includes appropriations in the Gas Tax Fund for the purchase of asphalt materials.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

The City routinely purchases asphalt and other materials from suppliers on an as-needed basis for on-going maintenance and repairs including potholes and street overlays. The suppliers will be compensated for materials based on the fee structures and material billing rate set forth in the respective one-year purchasing agreements.

The City has an existing contract with All American Asphalt, and procuring these additional materials and services through All American Asphalt will result in an insubstantial increase in the scope of such contract of approximately 20%.

The recommended Amendment No. 1 will increase the current authorized contract amount by $160,000 for a new total not-to-exceed contract amount of $965,970 for pothole and street overlay maintenance needs.
44 Department: Integrated Waste
Prepared By: Blaine M Ishii
Staff Member Presenting:

Tito Haes, Executive Director Public Works
Reviewed By: Bonnie Tam, Andrea Ampig
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 6
SUBJECT:

AMENDMENTS TO THE EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENTS WITH
MCLAUGHLIN WASTE EQUIPMENT, INC. FOR COMMERCIAL BIN CONTAINERS

AND ROLL-OFF CONTAINERS AND PARTS

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
May 16, 2023
SECTION:

CONSENT CALENDAR

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council take the following actions:

A
.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Operate in a Businesslike Manner
FISCAL IMPACT:

The recommended amendments increase the total authorized amount for commercial bin containers by $1,000,000 for a new not-to-exceed amount of $3,900,000 and increases the total authorized amount for roll-oﬀ containers and parts by $400,000 for a new not- to-exceed amount of $1,880,000. The Fiscal Year 2023-24 Proposed Budget includes appropriations for these amendments in the Integrated Waste Fund.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

Commercial Bin Containers

The Integrated Waste Department currently has commercial bin containers of various sizes for 45 refuse, recycling, organics/green waste recycling and food waste service, including 1.5 cubic yards (cy), 3.0 cy, 4.0 cy, and 6.0 cy. The Department routinely replaces bin containers to maintain an adequate inventory to meet customer needs. Additionally, with CalRecycle mandates for AB 341, AB 1826 and SB 1383 initiatives, there is an increased number of requests for commercial bin equipment.

On June 16, 2019, the City awarded Bid #1122 and entered into a one-year agreement for $300,000 with four optional one-year extensions with McLaughlin Waste Equipment, Inc. (McLaughlin) for the purchase of new and replacement commercial bin containers. The agreement was amended in May 2020 to exercise the ﬁrst extension and increase the total contract amount by $300,000.

Amendment No. 2 was executed in June 2021 to exercise the second extension and increase the total contract amount by $300,000. Amendment No. 3 was executed in May 2022 to exercise the third extension and increase the total contract amount by $2,000,000. Staﬀ is now recommending exercising the fourth extension and an increase to the contract amount by $1,000,000 for a total contract amount not-to-exceed $3,900,000.

Roll-Off Containers and Parts

The Integrated Waste Department currently has roll-oﬀ bin containers of various sizes for refuse, recycling and wood/green waste recycling. The Integrated Waste Department routinely repairs containers to maintain an adequate inventory to meet customer needs. Some containers are too costly to repair and require replacement. Additional containers are also needed to accommodate the increase in roll-off accounts due to growth in the Ontario Ranch area.

On June 21, 2021, the City awarded Bid #1418 and entered into a one-year agreement for $180,000 with four optional one-year extensions to McLaughlin for the purchase of new roll-oﬀ containers and parts. The Agreement was amended in April 2022 to exercise the ﬁrst extension and increase the total contract amount by $1,300,000. Staﬀ is now recommending exercising the second extension and to increase the total contract amount by $400,000 for a total contract amount not- to-exceed $1,880,000. Additionally, this contract includes language to allow proposed decreases to prices based on decreases to the price of goods under the American Metal Market (AMM) and provides for pricing review to be updated quarterly (July 1, October 1, January 1, and April 1) and for any orders placed to be charged at the decreased quarterly pricing at the time. 46 Department: Financial Services
Prepared By: Cruz Torres
Staff Member Presenting:

Armen Harkalyan, Executive Director of Finance
Reviewed By: Cecilia House, . .

Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 7
SUBJECT:

ACCEPTANCE OF A WRITTEN PETITION TO CREATE A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT; AND A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ESTABLISH CITY OF ONTARIO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 61 (MERRILL COMMERCE CENTER

SERVICES) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
May 16, 2023
SECTION:

CONSENT CALENDAR

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council consider and:

A
.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Operate in a Businesslike Manner
Focus Resources in Ontario's Commercial and Residential Neighborhoods Ensure the Development of a Well Planned, Balanced, and Self-Sustaining Community in Ontario Ranch
FISCAL IMPACT:

The use of Mello-Roos ﬁnancing in the Merrill Commerce Center Services development are projected to generate approximately $986,000 to fund Administrative Fees and Municipal Services. The use of Mello-Roos ﬁnancing is critical in achieving the City Councils goal to "Ensure the Development of a Well Planned, Balanced, and Self-Sustaining Community in Ontario Ranch." The use of Mello-Roos ﬁnancing for the Merrill Commerce Center Services development will not generate funds for facilities; therefore, bonds will not be issued as part of this formation.

The General Fund will be reimbursed approximately $940,000 for Municipal Services after the administrative expenses are deducted. City Council approval will be required in future years to process annual special tax levies.

47 BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 provides local government, with the consent from a majority of the property owners, the authority to establish Community Facilities Districts (CFD) for the purpose of levying special taxes to ﬁnance various kinds of Municipal Services. Municipal services that may be funded by a CFD include: police protection Services, ﬁre protection and suppression services, ambulance and paramedic services, maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads, open space, ﬂood and storm drain protection services, and maintenance and operation of any real property or tangible property with an estimated useful life of five or more years that is owned by the governmental entity.

Prologis LP, Research, has provided a written petition to the City requesting the formation of a CFD, along with a deposit pursuant to a Deposit Agreement dated for August 1, 2021, to fund Municipal Services. The Merrill Commerce Center Services will be a business park/industrial project that addresses the development of approximately 385.61 gross acres located south of Eucalyptus Avenue, north of Merrill Avenue, west of Carpenter Avenue, and east of Grove Avenue. As proposed, the project is anticipated to include 7,341,068 square feet of business park/industrial space at build-out.

Under the Mello-Roos Act, the initial steps in the formation of a CFD to fund Municipal Services require a Resolution declaring the City’s intention to establish a Community Facilities District and levy special taxes. Included, as part of the Resolution of Intention, is the proposed Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax for the City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 61 (Merrill Commerce Center Services). The terms of the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax are consistent with the City Council’s adopted Mello-Roos local goals and policies. Additionally, City staﬀ has presented and discussed the proposed Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax with the landowner of the project.

As noted above, the issuance of bonds to ﬁnance public improvements is not being contemplated for this project; therefore, a Resolution to issue bonds is not associated with this item. As proposed, the attached Resolution declaring the City’s intention to establish the district and to levy special taxes will set a public hearing to consider the formation of the CFD for the regularly scheduled City Council meeting on Tuesday, June 20, 2023. 48 RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,

CALIFORNIA, OF INTENTION TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY

FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED TO BE NAMED CITY OF ONTARIO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 61 (MERRILL COMMERCE

CENTER SERVICES) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX.

WHEREAS, Section 53318 of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”) provides that proceedings for the establishment of a community facilities district shall be instituted by a legislative body of a local agency when a petition requesting the institution of the proceedings signed by the owners of not less than 10% of the area of land proposed to be included in the community facilities district and not proposed to be exempt from the special tax proposed to be levied therein, describing the boundaries of the territory that is proposed for inclusion in the community facilities district and specifying the types of services to be financed by the community facilities district is filed with the clerk of the legislative body; and
WHEREAS, Section 53318 of the Act further provides that such a petition may not be acted upon until the payment of a fee in an amount that the legislative body determines, within 45 days of receiving such petition, is sufficient to compensate the legislative body for all costs incurred in conducting proceedings to create a community facilities district pursuant to the Act; and
WHEREAS, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Ontario (the “City”) has received a written petition (the “Petition”) from Prologis, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Landowner”), requesting the institution of proceedings to establish a community facilities district (the “Community Facilities District”) and to levy a special tax (the “Special Tax”) in the Community Facilities District, describing the boundaries of the territory that is proposed for inclusion in the Community Facilities District and specifying the types of services to be financed by the Community Facilities District; and WHEREAS, the Landowner has represented and warranted to the City Council that the Landowner is the owner of 100% of the area of land proposed to be included within the Community Facilities District and not proposed to be exempt from the Special Tax; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the request to institute proceedings to establish the Community Facilities District, the Landowner paid a fee in an amount that the City Council has determined is sufficient to compensate the City Council for all cost incurred in conducting proceedings to create the Community Facilities District pursuant to the Act.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ontario as follows:
49 SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and the City Council so finds and determines.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby finds that the Petition is signed by the landowner owning the requisite area of land proposed to be included within the Community Facilities District and not proposed to be exempt from the Special Tax.

SECTION 3. The City Council proposes to establish a community facilities district under the terms of the Act. The boundaries of the territory proposed for inclusion in the Community Facilities District are described in the map showing the proposed Community Facilities District (the “Boundary Map”) on file with the City Clerk of the City (the “City Clerk”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, which boundaries are hereby preliminarily approved and to which map reference is hereby made for further particulars. The City Clerk is hereby directed to sign the original Boundary Map and record, or cause to be recorded, the Boundary Map with all proper endorsements thereon in the office of the San Bernardino County Recorder within 15 days of the date of adoption of this Resolution, all as required by Section 3111 of the California Streets and Highways Code.

SECTION 4. The name proposed for the Community Facilities District is “City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 61 (Merrill Commerce Center Services).” SECTION 5. The services (the “Services”) proposed to be financed by the Community Facilities District pursuant to the Act are described under the caption “Services” on Exhibit B hereto. The incidental expenses proposed to be incurred are identified under the caption “Incidental Expenses” on Exhibit B hereto. No facilities are proposed to be financed by the Community Facilities District.

SECTION 6. Except where funds are otherwise available, the Special Tax sufficient to pay for all Services, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all nonexempt real property in the Community Facilities District, will be annually levied within the Community Facilities District. The rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax (the “Rate and Method”), in sufficient detail to allow each landowner within the proposed Community Facilities District to estimate the maximum amount that he or she will have to pay, is described in Exhibit C attached hereto, which is by this reference incorporated herein. The obligation to pay the Special Tax may not be prepaid and permanently satisfied. The Special Tax will be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes or in such other manner as the City Council shall determine, including direct billing of the affected property owners.

The Special Tax may only finance the Services to the extent that they are in addition to those provided in the territory of the Community Facilities District before the Community Facilities District is created. The Services may not supplant services already available within that territory when the Community Facilities District is created. 50 SECTION 7. The City Council hereby fixes Tuesday, June 20, 2023, at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the City Council may reach the matter, at 303 East B Street, Ontario, California, as the time and place when and where the City Council will conduct a public hearing on the establishment of the Community Facilities District; provided, that, in the event the June 20, 2023 City Council meeting is held via teleconference and/or videoconference only, the means by which the public may observe such public hearing and offer public comment shall be prescribed in the notice and agenda for such City Council meeting.

SECTION 8. The City Clerk is hereby directed to publish, or cause to be published, a notice of said public hearing one time in a newspaper of general circulation published in the area of the proposed Community Facilities District. The publication of said notice shall be completed at least seven days prior to the date herein fixed for said public hearing. Said notice shall contain the information prescribed by Section 53322 of the Act.

SECTION 9. The levy of the proposed Special Tax shall be subject to the approval of the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District at a special election.

The proposed voting procedure shall be by mailed or hand-delivered ballot among the landowners in the Community Facilities District, with each owner having one vote for each acre or portion of an acre such owner owns in the Community Facilities District.

SECTION 10. Each officer of the City who is or will be responsible for providing one or more of the proposed types of Services is hereby directed to study, or cause to be studied, the proposed Community Facilities District and, at or before said public hearing, file a report with the City Council containing a brief description of the Services by type that will in his or her opinion be required to adequately meet the needs of the Community Facilities District, and his or her estimate of the cost of providing the Services. Such officers are hereby also directed to estimate the fair and reasonable cost of the incidental expenses proposed to be paid. Such report shall be made a part of the record of said public hearing.

SECTION 11. All actions heretofore taken by the officers, employees and agents of the City with respect to the establishment of the Community Facilities District, or in connection with or related to any of the matters referred to herein, are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified.

SECTION 12. The officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things that they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution and not inconsistent with the provisions hereof.

SECTION 13. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.
51 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of May 2023. _____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP

CITY ATTORNEY
52 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
53 A-1
4140-9035-5504.3

EXHIBIT A

BOUNDARY MAP
54 B-1
4140-9035-5504.3

EXHIBIT B

SERVICES AND INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
Services
The types of services to be financed by the Community Facilities District are police protection services, fire protection and suppression services, ambulance and paramedic services, maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space, flood and storm protection services , maintenance and operation of fiber optic telecommunication, wireless communication and public safety camera systems and maintenance and operation of any real property or other tangible property with an estimated useful life of five or more years that is owned by the City.

Incidental Expenses
The incidental expenses proposed to be incurred include the costs associated with the creation of the Community Facilities District, determination of the amount of taxes, collection of taxes, payment of taxes, or costs otherwise incurred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the Community Facilities District. 55 4140-9035-5504.3

EXHIBIT C

PROPOSED RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX 56 57

City of Ontario CFD No. 61 1 April 13, 2023

CITY OF ONTARIO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 61
(MERRILL COMMERCE CENTER SERVICES)

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX

A Special Tax shall be levied on all Assessor’s Parcels in the City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 61 (Merrill Commerce Center Services) (“CFD No. 61”) and collected each Fiscal Year commencing in Fiscal Year 2023-24, in an amount determined by the City Council of the City of Ontario through the application of the Rate and Method of Apportionment, as described below. All of the real property in CFD No. 61, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent, and in the manner herein provided.

A. DEFINITIONS

The terms as may hereinafter be set forth have the following meanings:

“Act” means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter

2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code.

“Administrative Expense s” means the following actual or reasonabl y estimated costs directly related to the administration of CFD No. 61: the costs of computing the Special Taxes and preparing the annual Special Tax collection schedules (whether by the City or CFD No. 61 or both); the costs of collecting the Special Taxes (whether by the County or otherwise); the costs associated with preparing Special Tax disclosure statements and responding to public inquiries regarding the Special Taxes; the costs of the City or CFD No. 61 related to an appeal of the Special Tax; the City’s administration fees and third party expenses; the costs of City staff time and reasonable overhead related to CFD No. 61; and amounts estimated or advanced by the City or CFD No. 61 for any other a dministrative purposes of CFD No. 61, including attorney’s fees and other costs related to commencing and pursuing to completion any foreclosure of delinquent Special Taxes.

“Assessor’s Parcel” means a lot or parcel shown on an Assessor’s Parcel Map wit h an assigned Assessor’s Parcel Number.

“Assessor’s Parcel Map” means an official map of the Assessor of the County designating parcels by Assessor’s Parcel Number.

“Assessor’s Parcel Number” means, with respect to an Assessor’s Parcel, that number assigned to such Assessor’s Parcel by the County for purposes of identification.

“CFD Administrator” means an official of the City responsible for determining the Special Tax Requirement, providing for the levy and collection of the Special Tax, and performing the other duties provided for herein.
58 City of Ontario CFD No. 61 2 April 13, 2023

“CFD No. 61” means Cit y of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 61 (Merrill Commerce Center Services).

“City” means the City of Ontario, California.

“City Council” means the City Council of the City, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 61.

“County” means the County of San Bernardino.

“Fiscal Year” means the period starting July 1 and ending on the following June 30.

“Gated Community Attached Dwelling Unit” means a Unit within any residential building containing two or more d welling units (including at tached condominiums, townhouses, duplexes, triplexes, and apartments) within a gated community that, within such community, is primarily served by private interior streets.

“Land Use Class” means any of the classes listed in Table 1 below.

“Lower Income Household Welfare Exemption Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, an Assessor’s Parcel wit hin the boundaries of CFD No. 61 that is subject to a w elfare exemption under subdivision (g) of Section 214 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code (or any succ essor statut e), as indicated in the most recent County assess or’s roll finalized prior to such Fiscal Year.

“Maximum Special Tax” means, with respect to an Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property, the maximum Special Tax determined in accordance with Section C below that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on such Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property.

“Multiple Family Dwelling Unit” means a Unit within any residential building containing two or more dwelling units, including attached condominiums, townhomes , duplexes, triplexes, and apartments, but excluding Gated Community Attached Dwelling Units.

“Non-Residential” means any buildings that are for commercial lodging use, commercial retail use, institutional use (e.g., churches, private schools), commercial restaurant use, office use, or industrial use.

“Non-Residential Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, an Assessor’s Parcel for which a building permit for new construction was issued after January 1, 2021, and before May 1 of the prior Fiscal Year, for a Non-Residential use.

“Property Owner Association Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, property within the boundaries of CFD No. 61 that was owned by a property owner association, including any master or sub-association, as of January 1 of the prior Fiscal Year.

59 City of Ontario CFD No. 61 3 April 13, 2023
“Proportionately” means that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy to the Maximum Special Tax is equal for all Assessor's Parcels of Taxable Property.

“Public Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, property within the boundaries of CFD No. 61 that is (a) owned by, irrevocably offered to, or dedicated to the federal government, the State, the County, the City, or any l ocal government or other public agency or (b) encumbered by an easement for purposes of public or utility right-of-way that makes impractical its use for any purpose other than that set forth in such easement, provided that any property leased by a public agency to a private entity and subject to taxation under Section 53340.1 of the Act shall be taxed and classified according to its use.

“Rate and Method of Apportionment” means this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax.

“Residential Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, an Assessor’s Parcel for which a building permit for new construction of one or more Units was issued after January 1, 2021, and before May 1 of the prior Fiscal Year.

“Services” means the services authorized to be financed, in whole or in part, by CFD No. 61, including: police protection services; fire prot ection and suppression services; ambulance and paramedic services; maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads, and open space; flood and storm protection services; and maintenance and operation of any real property or other tangible property with an estimated useful life of five or more years that is owned by the City.

“Single Family Detached Dwelling Unit” means any residential building containing only one Unit on one legal lot, including single family residences and single family detached residential condominium units.

“Special Tax” means the special tax authorized by the qualified electors of CFD No. 61 to be levied within the boundaries of CFD No. 61.

“Special Tax Requirement” means the amount necessary in any Fiscal Year to pay the cost of the Services, Administrative Expenses, and an amount equal to Special Tax delinquencies based on the historical delinquency rate for Special Taxes , as determ ined by the CFD Administrator.

“Square Footage” or “Sq. Ft.” means, with respect to a building of Non -Residential Property, the gross floor area square footage reflected on the original construction building permit, or as set forth in other official records maintained by the City’s Building Department or other appropri ate means selected by CFD No. 61, for such building , plus any squ are footage subsequently added to a building of Non-Residential Property after issuance of a building permit for expansion or renovation of such building.

“State” means the State of California.

60 City of Ontario CFD No. 61 4 April 13, 2023
“Taxable Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, all Assessor ’s Parcels of Residential Property and Non-Residential Property within the boundaries of CFD No. 61 which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below.

“Unit” means an individual single -family detached or attached home, townhome, condominium, apartment unit, or other residential dwelling unit, including each separate living area within a half-plex, duplex, triplex, fourplex, or other residential structure.

B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CATEGORIES

Each Fiscal Year, beginning with Fiscal Year 2023-24, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 61 shall be classified as Residential Property (Single Family Detached Dwelling Unit, Multiple Family Dwelling Un it, or Gated Community Attached Dwelling Unit) or Non - Residential Property and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment as determined pursuant to Sections C and D below.

C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX

The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor’s Parcel classified as Taxable Property shall be determined by reference to Table 1 below.

TABLE 1

MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX

Land Use Class Maximum Special Tax
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Residential Property:

Single Family Detached Dwelling Unit $1,501.46 per Unit Multiple Family Dwelling Unit $1,301.19 per Unit
Gated Community Attached Dwelling Unit $1,091.19 per Unit Non-Residential Property $0.273800 per Sq. Ft.

On January 1 of each Fiscal Year, commencing January 1, 2024, the Maximum Special Tax to be applied in the next Fiscal Year shall be subject to an automatic increase at a rate equal to 4.0% of the amount in effect for the prior Fiscal Year.

In some instances an Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax levied on such Assessor’s Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Tax for all Units of Residential Property and Square Footage of Non- Residential Property (based on the applicable building permits, final subdivision map, parcel map, condominium plan, or other recorded County map) located on that Assessor’s Parcel. 61 City of Ontario CFD No. 61 5 April 13, 2023

D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX

Each Fiscal Year, beginning with Fiscal Year 20 23-24, the CFD Administrator shall determine the Special Tax Requirement. The Sp ecial Tax shall then be levied Proportionately on each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax for such Assessor’s Parcel , until the Special Tax Requirement is satisfied. However, the Special Tax levied in any Fiscal Year shall not increase by more than 4.0% of the amount of the Special Tax levied in the prior Fiscal Year.

E. EXEMPTIONS
Notwithstanding anything in this Rate and Method of Apportionment to t he contrary, no Special Tax shall be levied on Public Property or Property Owner Association Property.

No Special Tax shall be levied on Lower Income Household Welfare Exemption Property; provided, however, that if, in any Fiscal Year, applicable law does not require that Lower Income Household Welfare Exemption Property be exempt from some portion, or all, of the Special Tax, such portion, or all, of the Special Tax s hall be levied on such property in accordance with this Rate and Method of Apportionment based on the Land Use Class to which the Assessor’s Parcel is assigned.

F. APPEALS

Any property owner may file a written appeal of the Special Tax with CFD No. 61 claiming that the amount or application of the Special Tax is not correct. The appeal must be filed not later than one calendar year after having paid the Special Tax that is dispu ted, and the appellant must be current in all payments of Special Taxes. In addition, during the term of the appeal process, all Special Taxes levied must be pai d on or before the payment date established when the levy was made.

The appeal must specify the reasons why the appellant claims the Special Tax is in error.

The CFD Administrator shall review the appeal, meet with the appellant if the CFD Administrator deems necessary, and advise the appellant of its determination.

If the property owner disagrees with the CFD Administrator’s decision relative to the appeal, the owner may then file a written appeal with the City Council, whose subsequent decision shall be final and binding on all interested parties. If the decision of the CFD Administrator or subsequent decision by the City Council requires the Special Tax to be modified or changed in favor of the property owner, then the CFD Administrator shall determ ine if sufficient Special Tax revenue is available to make cash refund. If a cash refund cannot be made, then an adjustment shall be made to credit future Special Tax levy(ies).

This procedure shall be exclusive and its exhaustion by any property owner sh all be a condition precedent to filing any legal action by such owner. 62 City of Ontario CFD No. 61 6 April 13, 2023

G. MANNER OF COLLECTION

The Special Taxes shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that the Special Taxes may be collected in such other manner as the City Council shall determine, includ ing direct bil ling of a ffected property owners.

H. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX

The Special Tax shall continue to be levied indefinitely on an annual basis on all Taxable Property in CFD No. 61.

63 Department: Financial Services
Prepared By: Cecilia House
Staff Member Presenting:

Armen Harkalyan, Executive Director of Finance
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 8
SUBJECT:

AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH

HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOCIATES (HDL) FOR SALES TAX CONSULTING

AND REVENUE RECOVERY SERVICES AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HDL COREN & CONE FOR PROPERTY

TAX SERVICES

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
May 16, 2023
SECTION:

CONSENT CALENDAR

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the following amendments:

A
.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Operate in a Businesslike Manner
FISCAL IMPACT:

Amendment No. 3 with HdL will add indirect cost recovery to scope of work with an expiration date of June 30, 2025, with the option to renew term for two (2) additional one-year terms. The not-to-exceed amount of $1,700,000 includes the amount of $622,446 from Amendment No. 2 and adds $1,077,554 for business license, transient occupancy tax (TOT) and indirect cost recovery services. Additionally, included in the agreements are the contingency fees of 20% for indirect cost recoveries, 25% for audit fees relating to sales tax revenues and 35% for audit fees relating to business license and TOT revenues. These fees are not included in the not-to-exceed amount of this agreement. The costs for the contingency or audit fees will be oﬀset by the revenues recovered.

Amendment No. 1 with HdL Coren & Cone will set the term of the Agreement to expire on June 30, 2025, with the option to renew for two (2) additional one-year terms and set the new not-to-exceed 64 amount of $172,605. This total includes the original Agreement amount of $66,750, an additional $1,855 to cover the remaining services for Fiscal Year 2022-23, and an additional $100,000 for the Property Tax Consulting services. In addition, $4,000 is included to cover any optional services incurred for Fiscal Year 2023-24 through Fiscal Year 2024-25. Additionally, the City will pay contingency fees of 25% for revenue recovery and audit fees for property tax. These fees are not included in the not-to-exceed amount of this agreement. The costs for the contingency or audit fees will be oﬀset by the revenues recovered. An additional appropriation from the General Fund for Fiscal Year 2022-23 is $1,855 for the property tax services. Appropriations for subsequent ﬁscal years will be requested during the annual budget process. Future funding is contingent upon City Council approval and budget adoption.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

Hinderliter de Llamas (HdL) is currently providing sales tax forecasting, analysis, audit, and revenue recovery services to the City for the local Bradley Burns 1% sales tax rate, as well as business license and transient occupancy tax (TOT) collection. Due to the complex nature of administering local transactions and use tax, the misallocations and lack of reporting on the updated rate of the tax are common. Therefore, the City recently contracted with HdL to ensure continued sales tax and transactions and use tax revenue monitoring.

The City utilizes a Cost Allocation Plan (CAP) to budget, plan and track interdepartmental costs but this plan has not been applied in the past to costs incurred administering federally funded grant programs. The City proposes to contract with HdL to implement an indirect cost recovery program to recoup costs incurred through our grant programs. HdL will create and administer the City's cost recovery program and a successful program may result in up to $2.8 million in reimbursements to the City's General Fund.

HdL Coren & Cone is currently providing property tax forecasting, analysis, audit, and revenue recovery services.

It is worth noting that most of HdL's key staﬀ members have extensive local government experience, having previously held positions in city management, ﬁnance, planning, economic development or revenue collection.
65 Department: Community Life and Culture
Prepared By: Danielle Guevara
Staff Member Presenting:

Nicholas S. Gonzalez, Recreation & Community
Services Director
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 9
SUBJECT:

A GRANT APPLICATION FROM THE ADMINISTRATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING

FOR THE ACTIVE SENIOR ON THE GO PROGRAM

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
May 16, 2023
SECTION:

CONSENT CALENDAR

RECOMMENDATION:

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Operate in a Businesslike Manner
Encourage, Provide or Support Enhanced Recreational, Educational, Cultural and Healthy City Programs, Policies and Activities
FISCAL IMPACT:

The City of Ontario has been awarded $439,094 in grant funds under Congressional Directive authorized and appropriated in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023. The City is not required to provide matching funds for the grant. The grant performance period is 12 months, beginning September 1, 2023 through August 31, 2024. The Recreation & Community Services Department will include the associated grant revenue and expenditure appropriations in the next Quarterly Budget Report to the City Council.

If the grant is not renewed
after the initial 12 months, future costs will be funded through the General Fund.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

The Active Seniors on the Go program was introduced in 2021 to promote a healthy lifestyle and encourage interaction among seniors. The Active Senior on the Go program intends to expand senior services beyond the Ontario Senior Center into other parks and community centers throughout the City.

The program consists of three components: health and wellness, nutrition and food distribution, and transportation. This grant will allow the Recreation & Community Services Department to expand these components, specifically:

Expand health and wellness programs for seniors beyond the Ontario Senior Center 66 Broaden home bound meal delivery services for seniors Develop and operate a food pantry at the Ontario Senior Center Expand transportation services to the Ontario Senior Center and to non-emergency medical appointment.

Congresswoman Norma Torres recommended these funds as part of the House Appropriations Committee Community Projects Funding and is speciﬁcally designated for location projects that support community priorities. This funding will provide the Recreation & Community Services Department resources to quickly expand services throughout the city to the approximately 43,000 residents in the City of Ontario who are over age 50. This expansion will keep Ontario seniors informed and thriving through social engagement, social services, and outreach materials.

The grant budget will provide:

A full-time Recreation/Community Services Coordinator position, responsible for the day-to- day operations of the program, for a total cost of $91,381.

Part-time salaries equivalent to 1,498 hours, for a total cost of $72,713.

A health and wellness contract instructors for programs.

The Recreation & Community Services Department intends to submit an application for the next round of grant funding from the Administration for Community Living to continue the Active Seniors on the Go program beyond this one-year grant period. 67 Department: Financial Services
Prepared By: Maria Garcia
Staff Member Presenting:

Armen Harkalyan, Executive Director of Finance
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 10
SUBJECT:

FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET UPDATE REPORT

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
May 16, 2023
SECTION:

CONSENT CALENDAR

RECOMMENDATION:

A
.

That the City Council approve the budget adjustments and recommendations as presented in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Third Quarter Budget Update Report (Exhibit A), and adopt a
Resolution pertaining to the City Clerk and Treasurer salary; B
.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Operate in a Businesslike Manner
FISCAL IMPACT:

The recommended actions will aﬀect several fund budgets as outlined in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Third Quarter Budget Update Report and supporting schedules.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

The Third Quarter Budget Update Report for Fiscal Year 2022-23 reﬂects the Financial Services Agency's continued eﬀorts to provide timely, accurate, and understandable ﬁnancial information to assist the City Council with decision making and achievement of core goals. All Funds have been reviewed in preparing this report. The emphasis of this report is on the General Fund, which funds the majority of government services including public safety, recreation, library, museum, parks, building and planning.

The primary purposes of this report are to:

Revise the City's budget to reﬂect the City Council's actions taken since the Mid-Year Budget Update;
Recommend personnel and organizational changes to enhance program operations and efficiencies;
Recommend budget adjustments that are consistent with City Council goals and objectives; and
68 Comment on signiﬁcant budget and economic trends which may impact current ﬁscal year's budget development.

Fiscal Year 2022-23 Third Quarter Budget Update Recommendations

Third Quarter Budget Update recommendations are routine in nature and comprised predominately by City Council actions taken since the Mid-Year Budget Update. Third Quarter Budget Update includes proposed new expenditure budget requests, as well as revised revenue estimates for FY 2022-23. For the General Fund, the net result of these actions will bring the General Fund estimated available and unencumbered ending fund balance to $ 63.36 million or 18.8% of total appropriations. This amount achieves the goal set by City Council as a reserve for speciﬁc and deﬁned emergency events (such as an earthquake or pandemic) and to address immediate needs in resources without impacting City services. This goal was temporarily decreased to 15% and then 16% during the COVID pandemic but has since been brought back up to the previous set goal of 18% effective July 1, 2021, with the goal of increasing the reserves up to 25% in future fiscal years.

General Fund Highlights
$5.0 million Facilities & Parks Maintenance Transfer from General Fund $1.0 million IT Fund Transfer for Equipment from General Fund $1.0 million Equipment Services Fund Transfer from General Fund $1.0 million for Whispering Lakes Golf Course

Other Funds (non-General Fund) Highlights
$11.0 million Acquisition of 1135 E. State Street
$9.0 million for Vista Verde Contribution from Affordability in Lieu $3.0 million Sports Complex Property Acquisition
$1.5 million for Mountain & D Street Property Acquisition

Other Budget-Related Actions
The City Council last reviewed and adjusted the salary compensation of the City Clerk and City Treasurer on March 4, 2014 and adjustments were eﬀective after the election in November 2014.

The City Council now desires to adjust the salaries. The City Clerk and City Treasurer's salary will increase to $10.13 per hour, for a total of $1,756.00 per month. This increase will take eﬀect upon the adoption of the Resolution.

In addition to what has been presented, Staﬀ recommends the Mayor and City Council approve a salary grade table for unrepresented part-time employees to be eﬀective May 21, 2023. Currently, a speciﬁc compensation grade is aligned with each part-time classiﬁcation. The last time these compensation grades were signiﬁcantly modiﬁed was in 2017 to ensure compliance with California's minimum wage.

In addition, a 2% general salary increase for all part-time classiﬁcations was eﬀective on July 3, 2022. If adopted, the salary grade table will establish part-time salary grades PT1 through PT25 allowing for a wider compensation range that aligns with today's job market, mirrors the competitive compensation practices of other local government employers, and provides greater ﬂexibility for adjustment in the future as needed. The City Manager or their designee shall have the authority to associate a speciﬁc part-time classiﬁcation with one of the established salary 69 grades. The adoption of all Part-Time classiﬁcation salary ranges will also ensure that the City continues to be able to attract, retain and motivate a highly qualiﬁed part-time workforce.

Employees designated as part-time working a full-time classiﬁcation will continue to have their compensation aligned with the full-time classiﬁcation's salary grade. The table included in Exhibit B outlines the new proposed salary range after the increase is applied.

As Staﬀ continues to look at the Part-Time proﬁles for each classiﬁcation and becoming the employer of choice. Staﬀ recommends that City Council approve the implementation of bilingual pay incentive for part-time classiﬁcations in the amount of $1.25/hour. This aligns with the City's overall goal of providing exceptional customer service, especially for the diverse community that utilizes our recreational programs.

In addition, the attraction and retention of qualiﬁed part-time staﬀ continues to limit the ability of Recreation and Community Services to provide critical recreation and community service programs for summer months. Staﬀ therefore recommends that Council authorize the City Manager to implement attraction and retention programs totaling no more than $200,000 for hourly, part-time positions assigned to Recreation and Community Services.

Conclusion

As the City recovers from the last three years of economic disruption from the COVID pandemic, other challenges still exist: the continued war in Ukraine; rising consumer goods prices, fuel costs, and interest rates; and the impending recession due to accelerated inﬂation levels not seen since the early 1980's. Even with the anticipated additional resources, the City will need to continue to practice ﬁscal discipline and establish proactive measures to safely navigate the current and upcoming ﬁscal challenges, as well as deliver an unparalleled level of service and commitment to our community.

The Adopted Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23, as modiﬁed through this Third Quarter Budget
Update, reﬂects the City Council's continued commitment to support high quality public safety and municipal services, provides for the maintenance and expansion needs of the City's infrastructure and facilities, proﬁles an aggressive economic development strategy, and assures the investment and reinvestment of City resources into the community - all in the name of aﬀording Ontario residents and businesses an exceptional quality of life. With the City Council's leadership and their prudent ﬁscal policies, the City's long-term ﬁnancial health will further solidify its standing as the economic leader in the Inland Empire, and a formidable player in California and the nation. 70 orrt nng

EXHIBIT A
71 Page
General Fund Revenues by Category 3
General Fund Expenditures by Category 4
General Fund Expenditures by Agency 5
General Fund Budget Summary 6
Citywide Expenditures by Category 7
Citywide Expenditures by Fund Type 8
Authorized Full-Time Positions 9
Recommended Personnel Changes 10
Budget Adjustment Highlights 11
Detail of Recommended Budget Adjustments 15
City of Ontario
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update Report
Table of Contents

EXHIBIT A
72 FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget
First Quarter
Budget Update
Mid-Year
Budget Update
Third Quarter
Budget Update
FY 2022-23
Current Budget
Actuals as of
3/31/2023 % Received
Sales Tax 109,900,000$ 20,000,000$ 14,200,000$ 300,000$ 144,400,000$ 76,778,197$ 53.2% Property Tax 82,967,000 - 4,572,000 (2,420,000) 85,119,000 53,853,537 63.3% Transient Occupancy Tax 16,500,000 - - - 16,500,000 9,626,946 58.3% Business License Tax 8,763,000 - - - 8,763,000 5,774,450 65.9% Parking Tax 3,000,000 - - 1,000,000 4,000,000 2,592,600 64.8% Franchise Tax 3,000,000 - - 1,000,000 4,000,000 659,012 16.5% Other Taxes 1,700,000 - - - 1,700,000 1,348,198 79.3% Licenses and Permits 6,192,000 2,678,000 - 425,000 9,295,000 7,549,950 81.2% Intergovernmental 9,171,077 - 884,255 - 10,055,332 7,470,805 74.3% Intergovernmental - ARPA 9,449,310 - - - 9,449,310 4,124,543 43.6% Charges for Services 23,793,354 680,900 620,000 3,981,000 29,075,254 20,986,640 72.2% Charges for Services - OIAA 20,902,300 - - - 20,902,300 13,934,866 66.7% Use of Money & Property 1,341,992 - - (1,600) 1,340,392 3,140,706 234.3% Fines and Forfeitures 753,000 18,000 - - 771,000 592,911 76.9% Miscellaneous 1,720,000 3,890,031 2,008,375 264,850 7,883,256 7,684,251 97.5% Total General Fund Revenues 299,153,033$ 27,266,931$ 22,284,630$ 4,549,250$ 353,253,844$ 216,117,612$ 61.2% Transfers-In - - - 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 0.
0%
TOTAL RESOURCES 299,153,033$ 27,266,931$ 22,284,630$ 6,549,250$ 355,253,844$ 216,117,612$ 60.8% 1 Adopted Revenue Items were re-classed to be consistent with the new Workday Chart of Accounts 2 Other Taxes includes Property Transfer Tax ($1.5M) and Motor Vehicle In Lieu ($200K) 3 Intergovernmental includes Cost Allocation Plan Revenue, Disability, Worker's Compensation, & Unemployment Internal Service Allocation Revenue 4 American Rescue Plan Act
5 Charges for Services includes Special Districts Service Charges ($10.6M) 6 Ontario International Airport Authority
7 Includes Toyota Arena revenue from FY 2021-22 per agreement 8 Property Taxes includes reduction due to parcel adjustments from Ontario to Chino 9 Charges for Services includes increases to various plan check and permit fees. 10 Transfers-In includes transfer to General Fund from the Public Services Fee Fund City of Ontario
General Fund Revenue by Category
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update
1 7
3 2
4 5
6 10
8 9

EXHIBIT A
3 73
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget
CIP/Grants/POs
Carryforward
First Quarter
Budget Update
Mid-Year
Budget Update
Third Quarter
Budget Update
FY 2022-23
Current Budget
Actuals as of
03/31/20231 % Expended
Personnel Costs 196,234,997$ -$ 1,901,682$ 3,671,458$ 504,175$ 202,312,312$ 150,141,046$ 74.2% Operating Expenditures 27,179,820 1,490,547 1,378,010 2,938,613 1,185,850 34,172,840 20,695,465 60.6% Contractual Services 16,976,742 6,475,733 1,958,000 175,000 275,000 25,860,475 22,157,910 85.7% Internal Service Allocations 42,715,839 - 43,953 109,832 - 42,869,624 32,409,830 75.6% Reimbursement Agreements 8,965,212 740,535 - 640,000 - 1 0,345,747 5,2 91,289 51 .1% Debt Service - - - - - - - 0.0%
Capital Expenditures 367,000 477,231 583,600 90,000 - 1,517,831 943,314 62.1% Transfers-Out 9,438,410 - 26,000,000 5,683,669 7,110,000 48,232,079 38,771,535 80.4% Total General Fund Appropriations 301,878,020$ 9,184,046$ 31,865,245$ 13,308,572$ 9,075,025$ 365,310,908$ 270,410,389$ 74.0% FTE General Fund 854.88 - 12.60 64.50 - 931.98
FTE Other Funds 419.12 - 1.40 24.50 - 445.02
Total FTE All Funds 1,274.00 - 14.00 89.00 - 1,377.00 1 Includes expenses and encumbrances/PO's.
2 Personnel costs includes $500K to Police Billable OT for contract increase (Revenue offset). 4 Contractual Agreements include $275K additional funding for Fire Plan Check Services (Revenue Offset). 5 Transfers include $2.1M in Sales Tax Contribution to CIP, $3M for Helicopter, and $3.9M Retiree Medical contribution. 6 Transfers include $12M for Measure Q Capital, $14M for Economic Development, $5M for Facilities and Parks Maintenance, $4.5M for Retiree Medical pay-as-you-go costs, $1M IT Equipment Services Transfer, $160K for new vehicles to Fleet, an additional

3 Operating expenditures includes $1M for Whispering Lakes Golf Course, $155K funding for the State of the City.

City of Ontario
General Fund Expenditures by Category
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update
2 3
5 6
4 EXHIBIT A
4 74
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget
CIP/Grants/POs
Carryforward
First Quarter
Budget Update
Mid-Year
Budget Update
Third Quarter
Budget Update
FY 2022-23
Current Budget
Actuals as of
03/31/20231 % Expended
Community Development 28,162,047$ 5,233,461$ 609,008$ 211,050$ -$ 34,215,566$ 24,929,525 72.9% Community Life & Culture 20,157,624 953,608 364,173 885,499 - 22,360,904 15,430,084 69.0% Economic Development 14,239,987 909,860 1,690,978 994,372 1,154,850 18,990,047 11,307,827 59.5% Financial Services 17,815,770 3,126 59,108 109,592 959 17,988,555 9,649,760 53.6% Human Resources/Risk Management 4,883,899 544,896 29,753 14,923 - 5,473,471 4,299,201 78.5% Management Services 9,451,579 290,481 81,615 - 3,216 9,826,891 7,567,912 77.0% Ontario Fire Department 75,869,598 377,783 955,261 2,119,151 275,000 79,596,793 61,286,884 77.0% Ontario Police Department 113,392,979 363,194 1,796,492 2,676,407 531,000 118,760,072 88,569,686 74.6% Public Works 8,466,127 60,036 726,458 613,909 - 9,866,530 8,597,975 87.1% Transfers-Out 9,438,410 - 26,000,000 5,683,669 7,110,000 48,232,079 38,771,535 80. 4% Total Appropriations & Transfers-Out 301,878,020$ 8,736,445$ 32,312,846$ 13,308,572$ 9,075,025$ 365,310,908$ 270,410,389$ 74.0% FTE General Fund 854.88 - 12.60 64.50 - 931.98 FTE Other Funds 419.12 - 1.40 24.50 - 445.02 Total FTE All Funds 1,274.00 - 14.00 89.00 - 1,377.00 -
1 Includes expenses and encumbrances/PO's.
2 Economic Development includes $1M for Whispering Lakes Golf Course, $155K funding for the State of the City. 3 Financial Services includes $1K for compensation adjustment for the City Treasurer. 4 Management Services includes $2K compensation adjustment for the Mayor, $1K compensation adjustment for the City Clerk. 6 Ontario Police Department includes $500K to Police Billable OT for contract increase (Revenue Offset), $31K in Miscellaneous expenses due to increase in bilable events (Revenue offset). 8 Transfers include $12M for Measure Q Capital, $14M for Economic Development, $5M for Facilities and Parks Maintenance, $4.5M for Retiree Medical pay-as-you-go costs, $1M IT Equipment Services Transfer, $160K for new vehicles to Fleet, an additional $1M for IT for equipment, and $1.1M for Fleet Services.

City of Ontario
General Fund Expenditures by Agency
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update
7 Transfers include $2.1M contribution from Sales Tax Revenue to CIP's, $370K Parkway Maintenance contribution, $3M for the Public Safety Helicopter, $12K for Streetlight Maintenance contribution, and $3.9M for Retiree Medical. 5 Ontario Fire Department includes $275K additional funding for Fire Plan Check Services (Revenue Offset). 2 4
5 3
7 8
6 EXHIBIT A
5 75
Fiscal Year 2022-23 Current Budget:

Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 73,920,837$
Fiscal Year 2022-23 Adopted Budget:

Resources & Transfers-In 299,153,033
Appropriations & Transfers-Out (301,878,020)
First Quarter Budget Recommendations
Resources & Transfers-In 27,266,931
Appropriations & Transfers-Out (17,865,245)
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Carryforward Encumbrances (9,184,046) Recommended Funding for Economic Development Activities1 (14,000,000)
Recommended Allocation to Economic Uncertainty Reserve1 (500,000)
Mid-Year Budget Recommendations
Resources & Transfers-In 22,284,630
Appropriations & Transfers-Out (13,308,572)
Third Quarter Budget Recommendations
Resources & Transfers-In 6,549,250
Appropriations & Transfers-Out (9,075,025)
Estimated Ending Fund Balance 63,363,773$
Estimated General Fund Reserve % 18.8%
(B) For FY 2022-23, the Council approved reserve level is 18% with the goal of increasing the reserves up to 25% in future fiscal years. 1 (A) Total GF Reserves is adjusted for a one time transfer exclusion of $14M for Economic Development Activities, and $500k allocation to Economic Uncertainty Reserve.

City of Ontario
General Fund Budget Summary
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update
1 EXHIBIT A
6 76
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget
CIP/Grants/POs
Carryforward
First Quarter
Budget Update
Mid-Year
Budget Update
Third Quarter
Budget Update
FY 2022-23
Current Budget
Actuals as of
03/31/20231 % Expended
Personnel Costs 262,771,754$ -$ 3,434,805$ 5,430,432$ 1,356,284$ 272,993,275$ 198,124,567$ 72.6% Operating Expenditures 173,666,937 52,371,933 3,592,406 6,457,803 24,812,245 260,901,324 144,023,694 55.2% Contractual Services 69,513,931 232,299,420 18,895,816 16,544,199 (25,710,995) 311,542,371 135,485,171 43.5% Internal Service Allocations 69,935,874 19,542 47,374 142,760 (1,609) 70,143,941 52,489,830 74.8% Reimbursement Agreements 8,965,212 16,841,809 - 640,000 - 26,447,021 7, 193,813 27. 2% Debt Service 35,769,756 - 9,000,000 6, 689,930 13, 500,000 64, 959,686 24, 873,956 38. 3% Capital Expenditures 9,645,000 14,948,333 7,190,941 54,734,706 23,725,300 110,244,280 52,436,926 47.6% Transfers-Out 31,346,668 - 26,000,000 21,887,811 5,110,000 84,344,479 77,427,357 91.8% Total Citywide Appropriations 661,615,132$ 316,481,037$ 68,161,342$ 112,527,641$ 42,791,225$ 1,201,576,377$ 692,055,314$ 57.6% FTE General Fund 854.88 - 12.60 64.50 - 931.98 FTE Other Funds 419.12 - 1.40 24.50 - 445.02 Total FTE All Funds 1,274.00 - 14.00 89.00 - 1,377.00 1 Includes expenses and encumbrances/PO's.
7 Transfers includes $5M for Parks & Facilities Maintenance Fund, $2M from NMC Public Services to General Fund, $1M for Equipment Services Fund, $1M for IT Fund, and $(4M) reversal of transfer from NMC Public Services Fund to NMC Fire Impact Fund.
4 Contractual Services includes includes $(10M) for budget revision for Euclid Avenue Recycled Water System WA1502, $(9M) for budget revision for Water Main Improvements WA2303, and $(5M) budget revision for Vineyard Sanitary Sewer Project SE1902, and $(2.9M) budget revision for Climatec Loan project closeout. 6 Capital Expenditures includes $17M for acquisition of 1135 E. State Street, $2.9M for acquisition of Entertainment District - Triangle Piemonte Property, $1.7M for 305-307 N Mountain Re-Settlement Agreement Property Acquisition 5 Debt Service includes $9M for Vista Verde II Contribution to OHA/Agency Fund from Affordability in Lieu, $3M for Sports Complex Property Acquisition, and $1.5M for Mountain & D Street Property Acquisition to OHA/Agency Fund from Affordability in Lieu.

City of Ontario
Citywide Expenditures by Category
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update
3 Operating Expenditures includes $10.9M for CFD Administrative Expense, $8.2M for various DIF Fund refunds, $1.1M for increase to Natural Gas Costs, and $1M for Whispering Lakes Golf Course. 2 Personnel Costs includes $1.3M for COPS Hiring Program Grant, $500K for overtime for Police Department, and $(400K) of various grant funding adjustments. 2 3
4 5
6 7

EXHIBIT A
7 77
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget
CIP/Grants/POs
Carryforward
First Quarter
Budget Update
Mid-Year
Budget Update
Third Quarter
Budget Update
FY 2022-23
Current Budget
Actuals as of
03/31/20231 % Expended
General Fund 301,878,020$ 9,184,046$ 31,865,245$ 13,308,572$ 9,075,025$ 365,310,908$ 270,410,389$ 74.0% Special Revenue Fund 43,081,236 74,698,692 3,168,018 15,865,408 26,324,991 163,138,345 101,814,739 62.4% Capital Projects Fund 19,876,031 125,131,010 5,573,837 60,864,119 39,486,862 250,931,859 57,011,858 22.7% Enterprise Funds 183,841,718 64,136,107 10,105,670 5,357,384 (23,611,432) 239,829,447 159,036,042 66.3% Internal Service Funds 110,978,709 31,274,094 8,489,635 17,091,374 (9,984,221) 157,849,591 102,235,150 64.8% Total City Funds 659,655,714$ 304,423,949$ 59,202,405$ 112,486,857$ 41,291,225$ 1,177,060,150$ 690,508,178$ 58.7% Ontario Housing Authority 1,959,418 12,057,088 8,958,937 40,784 1,500,000 24,516,227 1,547,136 6.3% Total All Funds 661,615,132$ 316,481,037$ 68,161,342$ 112,527,641$ 42,791,225$ 1,201,576,377$ 692,055,314$ 57.6% FTE General Fund 854.88 - 12.60 64.50 931.98 FTE Other Funds 419.12 - 1.40 24.50 445.02 Total FTE All Funds 1,274.00 - 14.00 89.00 1,377.00 1 Includes expenses and encumbrances/PO's.
2 General Fund includes $5M for Parks & Facilities Maintenance Fund, $1M for Equipment Services Fund, $1M for IT Fund, $1M for Whispering Lakes Golf Course, and $500K for overtime for Police Department (Revenue Offset) 3 Special Revenue Funds includes $10.9M for CFD Administrative Expense, $9.2M adjustment from Pension Benefit Fund to the newly set up Economic Development Activities Fund, $2.9M for acquisition of Entertainment District - Triangle Piemonte Property, $1.7M for 305-307 N Mountain Re-Settlement Agreement Property Acquisition, $1.3M for COPS Hiring Program Grant, and $800K for various DIF Fund refunds. 4 Capital Projects Funds includes $17M for acquisition of 1135 E. State Street, $9M for Vista Verde II Contribution to OHA/Agency Fund from Affordability in Lieu, $7.4M for various DIF Fund refunds, $3M for Sports Complex Property Acquisition, and $1.5M for Mountain & D Street Property Acquisition Contribution to OHA/Agency Fund from Affordability in Lieu. 5 Enterprise Funds includes $(10M) for budget revision for Euclid Avenue Recycled Water System WA1502, $(9M) for budget revision for Water Main Improvements WA2303, and $(5M) budget revision for Vineyard Sanitary Sewer Project SE1902.
6 Internal Service Funds includes $(9.2M) adjustment from Pension Benefit Fund to Economic Development Fund, $(2.9M) budget revision for Climatec Loan project closeout, and $1.1M for increase to Natural Gas Costs.

City of Ontario
Citywide Expenditures by Fund Type
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update
2 3
4 5
6 EXHIBIT A
8 78
Recommended Recommended Recommended
Agency
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget
First Quarter
Budget Update
Mid-Year Budget
Update
Third Quarter
Budget Update
Total Authorized
Full-Time Positions
Community Development 112.00 1.00 7. 00 - 120. 00 Community Life & Culture 58.00 5.00 6. 00 - 69. 00 Economic Development 6.00 - 3. 00 - 9. 00 Financial Services 42.00 - 4.00 - 46.00 Human Resources 23.00 - 2.00 - 25.00 Information Technology 33.00 - 6.00 - 39.00 Management Services 38.00 - - - 38.00 Ontario Fire Department1
228.00 1.00 29. 00 - 258. 00 Ontario Municipal Utilities Company 124.00 - 8.00 - 132.00 Ontario Police Department2
379.00 6.00 16. 00 - 401. 00 Public Works 231.00 1.00 8.00 - 240.00 Total Authorized Full-Time Positions3 1,274.00 14.00 89.00 0.00 1,377.00 General Fund 854.88 12.60 64.50 - 931.98 Other Funds 419.12 1.40 24.50 - 445.02 Total FTE All Funds 1,274.00 14.00 89.00 - 1,377.00 1 OFD positions includes the following sworn positions 185.00 1.00 24.00 - 210.00 2 OPD positions includes the following sworn positions 282.00 5.00 8.00 - 295.00 3 FY 2021-22 Adopted Full-Time Positions: 1,219
City of Ontario
Authorized Full-Time Positions
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update

EXHIBIT A
9 79
Agency Department General Fund Other Fund Total Position Action Economic Development
Economic Development (1.00) - (1.00) Economic Development Specialist Deletion 5,585$ - 6,790$ Economic Development 1.00 - 1.00 Economic Development Analyst Addition 6,041$ - 7,344$ - - -
Financial Services
Business License (1.00) (1.00) Business License Supervisor Salary Realignment 8,381$ - 10,187$ Business License 1.00 1.00 Business License Supervisor Salary Realignment 7,758$ - 9,428$ - - -
Ontario Municipal Utilities
Water - (1.00) (1.00) Water Production Supervisor Deletion 6,231$ - 7,571$ Utilities Customer Service 0.45 0.45 Utilities Customer Service Supervisor Addition 6,762$ - 8,221$ Utilities Customer Service 0.23 0.23 Utilities Customer Service Supervisor Addition 6,762$ - 8,221$ Utilities Customer Service - 0.32 0.32 Utilities Customer Service Supervisor Addition 6,762$ - 8,221$ - - -
Public Works
Commercial Bin Collection - (2.00) (2.00) Integrated Waste Lead Collector Deletion 4,777$ - 5,801$ Commercial Bin Collection - 2.00 2.00 Integrated Waste Supervisor Addition 5,921$ - 7,197$ - - -
Total Additions/(Deletions) - - - Net Change By Fund Net FTE Change
1000 General Fund -
5010 Water Operating (0.55)
5110 Sewer Operating 0.23
5210 Integrated Waste 0.32
Grand Total (0.00)
*Costs will be absorbed within the department's respective budget Recommended Personnel Changes
City of Ontario
Salary Range
Proposed Change
Third Quarter Budget Update
Fiscal Year 2022-23

EXHIBIT A
10 80
Agency Description
Appropriation
Adjustment General Fund Other Funds
Community Development
ESG Homeless Prevention & Rehousing grant reconciliation for final grant billing 766,700 - 766,700 CDBG - COVID19 Short Term Rental/Utilties Grant Reconciliation for final grant billing (Revenue Offset) 349,472 - 349,472 DIF refunds of building permits and /or DIF reimbursements paid to date 8,180,000 - 8,180,000 Mountain & D Street Property Acquisition Contribution to OHA/Agency Fund from Affordability in Lieu Fund 3,000,000 3,000,000 Vista Verde II Contribution to OHA/Agency Fund from Affordibility in Lieu Fund 9,000,000 9,000,000 21,296,172 - 21,296,172 Community Life & Culture
Americorps California For All Education Grant 33,760 - 33,760 National Recreation & Park Association Supporting Healthy Aging Through Parks Grant 3,000 - 3,000 OmniTrans Measure I Grant Budget Revision (118,904) - (118,904) Americorps State Continuation Grant Budget Revision (390,376) - (390,376) Budget Revision for Ontario Promise Corps Grant (217) - (217) Provide focus group and outreach for Opiod Settlement Plan Initiative (Offset by Opiod Settlement Funds) 9,525 - 9,525 (463,212) - (463,212) City of Ontario
Budget Adjustment Highlights
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update

EXHIBIT A
11 81
Agency Description
Appropriation
Adjustment General Fund Other Funds
City of Ontario
Budget Adjustment Highlights
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update
Economic Development
Whispering Lakes Golf Course 1,000,000 1,000,000 - Budget Revision for State of the City 154,850 154,850 - Acquisition of 1135 E. State Street 17,000,000 - 17,000,000 Sports Complex Property Acquisition 3,000,000 - 3,000,000 Fallis House-Mobility Hub Ins. Additional Appropriations for environmental remediation expense 294,862 - 294,862 Entertainment District - Triangle Piemonte Property Acquisition 2,940,300 - 2,940,300 Acquisition of 125 N. Euclid Ave 675,000 - 675,000 305-307 N Mountain Settlement Agreement Property Acquisition 1,700,000 - 1,700,000 26,765,012 1,154,850 25,610,162 Financial Services
Compensation Adjustment for City Treasurer 959 959 - Budget Revision for CFD Administrative Expense 10,955,345 - 10,955,345 2023 Lease Revenue Bond Cost of Issuance 555,000 555,000 11,511,304 959 11,510,345 Information Technology
MS1707_5011 Utility Billing System Upgrade Budget Revision (1,710) - (1,710) MS1707_5111 Utility Billing System Upgrade Budget Revision (8,611) - (8,611) MS1707_5210 Utility Billing System Upgrade Budget Revision (212) - (212) IT Telecommunication Services Budget Revision 360,000 - 360,000 349,467 - 349,467

EXHIBIT A
12 82
Agency Description
Appropriation
Adjustment General Fund Other Funds
City of Ontario
Budget Adjustment Highlights
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update
Management Services
Compensation Adjustment for City Clerk 959 959 - Compensation Adjustment for Mayor (CC Approved 03/21/2023) 2,257 2,257 - 3,216 3,216 - OMUC
Budget Revision for Euclid Avenue Recycled Water System WA1502 (10,000,000) - (10,000,000) Budget Revision for Water Main Improvements WA2303 (9,000,000) - (9,000,000) Budget Revision for Vineyard Sanitary Sewer Project SE1902 (5,000,000) - (5,000,000) (24,000,000) - (24,000,000) Ontario Fire Department
Additional Appropriations for Plan Check Services (Revenue Offset) 275,000 275,000 - 275,000 275,000 - Ontario Police Department
Officer Wellness and Mental Health Grant Award 193,072 - 193,072 Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) Grant FY21 Growth Payment (CC Approved 03/21/23) 170,288 - 170,288 Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) Grant FY22 Growth Payment (CC Approved 12/06/22) 182,022 - 182,022 Additional Appropriations for Contract Increases (Revenue Offset) 531,000 531,000 - FT 2022 COPS Hiring Program Grant (CC Approved 10/18/22) 1,250,000 - 1,250,000 DHS Homeland Security FY20 - PD Grant 37,073 - 37,073 Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) FY22 48,930 - 48,930 2,412,385 531,000 1,881,385

EXHIBIT A
13 83
Agency Description
Appropriation
Adjustment General Fund Other Funds
City of Ontario
Budget Adjustment Highlights
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update
Public Works
Additional Appropriations for Fleet Services Shop at PD Project for Contingency for Construction and Purchase of IT Equipment 100,000 - 100,000 Appropriate Additional Budget for City Hall Renovation Project for First and Second Floor Office Improvements 82,000 - 82,000 Fire Station 1 Budget Adjustment from NMC Fire impact to OMC Fire Impact - - - Project Closeout for Climatec Loan PF2103 (2,898,220) (2,898,220) Used Oil Grant (OPP13) FY 2022-23 27,200 27,200 Beverage Container Recycling Grant FY 2022-23 44,901 44,901 Emergency Vehicle Purchase for Police Department 110,000 110,000 Additional Appropriations for emergency mold/ACM remediation, roof, plumbing, HVAC repairs and new roll up doors. 150,000 150,000 Additional Appropriations for Procurement of Tires and Cost Increase 160,000 160,000 Additional Appropriations for Police Department Fleet Shop inventory parts 100,000 100,000 Additional Funding for paving materials for asphalt overlays. 190,000 190,000 Additional Appropriations for Integrated Waste Residential Landfill Disposal for higher volumes of organic waste 327,000 327,000 Additional Appropriations for Natural Gas cost increase 1,100,000 1,100,000 Additional Appropriations to paint king standard lights (Euclid Ave, Armsley Ave, Ontario Museum of History and Art, and Amtrack Station) 39,000 39,000
(468,119) - ( 468,119) Total Expenditures 37,681,225 1,965,025 35,716,200 Transfers-Out 5,110,000 7,110,000 (2,000,000) Grand Total 42,791,225$ 9,075,025$ 33,716,200$

EXHIBIT A
14 84
Appropriation Revenue Operating Operating Fund Balance
Description Adjustments Adjustments Transfers-In Transfers-Out Impact

GENERAL FUND
Fund 1000 - General Fund
Funding for State of the City 154,850 154,850 - - - Third Quarter Revenue Update Fire Plan Review & Permit Fees - 300,000 - - 300, 000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Fire Inspection (non-permitted) Revenue Adjustment - (50,000) - - (50,000) Third Quarter Revenue Update F.P.B. Standby Revenue Adjustment - 50,000 - - 50,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Operational Permits - 25,000 - - 25,000 Additional Appropriations for Plan Check Services (Revenue Offset) 125,000 - - - (125,000) Additional Appropriations for Plan Check Services (Revenue Offset) 150,000 - - - (150,000) Third Quarter Revenue Update Alarm Ordinance Fees - 205,000 - - 205,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Special Police Services - 76,000 - - 76,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Toyota Arena Security - 250,000 - - 250,000 Additional Appropriations for Contract Increases (Revenue Offset) 31,000 - - - (31,000) Additional Appropriations for Contract Increases (Revenue Offset) 500,000 - - - (500,000) IT Fund Transfer for Equipment from General Fund - - - 1,000,000 (1,000,000) Third Quarter Revenue Update Public Safety Tax Prop 172 - 300,000 - - 300,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Property Tax - Current Secured - (2,160,000) - - (2,160,000) Third Quarter Revenue Update Property Tax - Current Unsecured - (260,000) - - (260,000) Third Quarter Revenue Update Parking Tax - 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Franchise Fee - 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Electrical Permits - 400,000 - - 400,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Principal Payment - Rehabilitation Loan - (1,600) - - (1,600) Third Quarter Revenue Update Vehicle Release Fee - 70,000 - - 70,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update On Scene Filming Standby - 40,000 - - 40,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Building Plan Check Fees - 500,000 - - 500, 000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Construction Inspection Fees - 1,500,000 - - 1,500,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Engineering Plan Review Fees - 400,000 - - 400,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Use Permits - OMC - 75,000 - - 75,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Plan Check/Inspections - NMC - 100,000 - - 100,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Plan Check/Inspections - OMC - 75,000 - - 75,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Systematic Inspection Program Fee - 75,000 - - 75,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Contract Programs - 100,000 - - 100,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Facility Rentals/Reservations - 75,000 - - 75,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Municipal Sports - 40,000 - - 40,000 Third Quarter Revenue Update Community Center Programs - 100,000 - - 100,000 Equipment Services Transfer from General Fund - - - 1,000,000 (1,000,000) Facilities & Parks Maintenance Transfer from General Fund - - - 5,000,000 (5,000,000) General Fund Transfer from NMC Public Services - - 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 Whispering Lakes Golf Course 1,000,000 - - - (1,000,000) OIAA/DOJ Settlement Funding for Police Department Vehicle at Ontario International Airport to Provide Law Enforecement Services - 110,000 - - 110,000 Equipment Services Transfer from General Fund for OIAA/DOJ Settlement Funding for Police Department Vehicle at ONT - - - 110, 000 ( 110,000) Compensation Adjustment for City Clerk and City Treasurer 1,918 - - - (1,918) Compensation Adjustment for Mayor (CC Approved 03/21/2023) 2,257 - - - (2,257) GENERAL FUND TOTAL 1,965,025 4,549,250 2 ,000,000 7 ,110,000 ( 2,525,775) City of Ontario
Detail of Recommended Budget Adjustments by Fund
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update

EXHIBIT A
15 85
Appropriation Revenue Operating Operating Fund Balance
Description Adjustments Adjustments Transfers-In Transfers-Out Impact City of Ontario
Detail of Recommended Budget Adjustments by Fund
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Fund 2010 - Community Development Block Grant
ESG Homeless Prevention & Rehousing grant reconciliation for final grant billing 766,700 915,335 - - 148,635 CDBG - COVID19 Short Term Rental/Utilities Grant Reconciliation for final grant billing 349,472 349,472 - - - FY20 Emergency Solutions Grants Admin - ESG Revenue Adjustment - 113 - - 113 FY20 Emergency Solutions Grants Street Outreach - ESG Grant Revenue Adjustment - 167 - - 167 FY20 Emergency Solutions Grants Homeless Prevention - ESG Grant Revenue Adjustment - 493 - - 493 Emergency Solutions Grants ESG - COVID19 HP&RR Program Revenue Adjustment - 89,917 - - 89,917 Emergency Solutions Grants ESG - COVID19 Motel Voucher Program Revenue Adjustment - 259,772 - - 259,772 Emergency Solutions Grants ESG - CV2 Admin Revenue Adjustment - 25,281 - - 25,281 Emergency Solutions Grants ESG - CV2 Street Outreach Revenue Adjustment - 40,639 - - 40,639 Community Development Block Grant HOGI Vesta Property Revenue Adjustment - 21,934 - - 21,934 Community Development Block Grant Assisi House Renovations Revenue Adjustment - 3,523 - - 3,523 Community Development Block Grant Weatherization Home Improvement Revenue Adjustment - 355,261 - - 355,261 Community Development Block Grant Community Block Wall Mountain Ave Revenue Adjustment - 195,013 - - 195,013 Community Development Block Grant Downtown Storefront Façade Improvement Revenue Adjustment - 155,829 - - 155,829 Community Development Block Grant Mission-Mountain Storefront Façade Revenue Adjustment - 125, 000 - - 125,000 Community Development Block Grant Alley Pavement Rehab Project Revenue Adjustment - 10,629 - - 10,629 Community Development Block Grant 411 N Parkside Revenue Adjustment - 98,400 - - 98,400 Community Development Block Grant Sam Alba Park Restroom Rehab Revenue Adjustment - 348,584 - - 348,584 Community Development Block Grant LED Streetlight Conversion Project Revenue Adjustment - 199,950 - - 199,950 1,116,172 3,195,312 - - 2,079,140 Fund 2020 - HOME Grants
HOME Investment Partnerships 411 N Parkside - HOME Revenue Adjustment - 693,796 - - 693,796 HOME Investment Partnerships 2018 HOME TBRA IV Mercy Revenue Adjustment - 589 - - 589 HO
ME Investment Partnerships Neighborhood Revit Projects Revenue Adjustment - 760,000 - - 760,000 HOME Investment Partnerships 2021 HOME TBRA Mercy House Admin Revenue Adjustment - 40,000 - - 40,000 - 1,494,385 - - 1,494,385 Fund 2021 - Housing Grants
Emporia Phase II Grant Revenue Adjustment - 1,880,010 - - 1,880,010 - 1,880,010 - - 1,880,010 Fund 2400 - General Fund Grants
Officer Wellness and Mental Health Grant Award 193,072 193,072 - - - Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) Grant FY21 Growth Payment (CC Approved 03/21/23) 170,288 170,288 - - - Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) Grant FY22 Growth Payment (CC Approved 12/06/22) 182,022 182,022 - - - AmeriCorps California For All Education Grant 33,760 33,760 - - - National Recreation & Park Association Supporting Healthy Aging Through Parks Grant 3,000 3,000 - - - Transformative Climate Communities GR_MS_TCAH01 Revenue Adjustment - (193,839) - - (193,839) Transformative Climate Communities GR_TCGA18 Revenue Adjustment - 151,378 - - 151,378 OmniTrans Measure I Grant Budget Revision (118,904) - - - 118,904 AmeriCorps State Continuation Grant Budget Revision (390,376) - - - 390,376 Ontario Promise Corps Grant Budget Revision (217) - - - 217 FY 2022 COPS Hiring Program Grant (CC Approved 10/18/22) 1,250,000 1,250,000 - - - DHS Homeland Security FY20 - PD Grant 37,073 37,073 - - - Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) FY22 48,930 48,930 - - - 1,408,648 1,875,684 - - 467, 036

EXHIBIT A
16 86
Appropriation Revenue Operating Operating Fund Balance
Description Adjustments Adjustments Transfers-In Transfers-Out Impact City of Ontario
Detail of Recommended Budget Adjustments by Fund
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update
Fund 2522 - Opioid Settlement
Provide focus group and outreach for Opioid Settlement Plan Initiative (Offset by Opioid Settlement Funds) 9,525 - - - ( 9,525) Third Quarter Revenue Update Miscellaneous Receipts for Opioid Settlement Funds - 9,525 - - 9, 525 9,525 9,525 - - - Fund 2530 - Gas Tax
Additional Funding for paving materials for asphalt overlays. 190,000 - - - ( 190,000) 190,000 - - - ( 190,000) Fund 2570 - Economic Development Activities Fund
Move MS1805 West Euclid Revitalization Project from Pension Benefit to Economic Development Activities Fund 7,613,846 - - - (7,613,846) Move MS2101 Airport EDA Project Area Project from Pension Benefit to Economic Development Activities Fund 1,537,391 - - - (1,537,391) Move MS2104 Redevelopment NWC State & Bon View Project from Pension Benefit to Economic Development Activities Fund 53,764 - - - (53,764) Entertainment District - Triangle Piemonte Property Acquisition 2,940,300 - - - (2,940,300) 305-307 N Mountain Settlement Agreement Property Acquisition 1,700,000 - - - (1,700,000) 13,845,301 - - - (13,845,301) Fund 2650 - Park Impact/Quimby
DIF refunds of building permits and /or DIF reimbursements paid to date 800,000 - - - ( 800,000) 800,000 - - - ( 800,000) Fund 2660 - NMC Public Services
NMC Fire Impact Transfer from NMC Public Services Reversal - - - ( 4,000,000) 4, 000,000 General Fund Transfer from NMC Public Services - - - 2, 000,000 ( 2,000,000) - - - ( 2,000,000) 2, 000,000 Fund 2660 - Old Model Colony Services CFDs
Budget Revision for CFD Administrative Expense 55,930 - - - ( 55,930) 55,930 - - - ( 55,930) Fund 2920 - Ontario Ranch Services CFDs
Budget Revision for CFD Administrative Expense 10,899,415 819,938 - - ( 10,079,477) 10,899,415 819,938 - - ( 10,079,477) SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS TOTAL 28,324,991 9,274,854 - ( 2,000,000) ( 17,050,137)

EXHIBIT A
17 87
Appropriation Revenue Operating Operating Fund Balance
Description Adjustments Adjustments Transfers-In Transfers-Out Impact City of Ontario
Detail of Recommended Budget Adjustments by Fund
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update

CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
Fund 4010 - Capital Projects
Acquisition of 1135 E. State Street (Part 150) 17,000,000 - - - ( 17,000,000) Appropriate additional budget for City Hall Renovation Project for first and second floor office improvements 82,000 - - - ( 82,000) Sports Complex Property Acquisition 3,000,000 - - - ( 3,000,000) MS2211 Fallis House Additional Appropriations for Environmental Remediation Expense 294,862 1,002,452 - - 707, 590 2023 Lease Revenue Bond and Cost of Issuance 555,000 100,000,000 - - 99, 445,000 2023 Lease Revenue Bond Cost of Issuance 555,000 - - - ( 555,000) 2023 Lease Revenue Bond Proceeds - 100,000,000 - - 100, 000,000 Acquisition of 125 N. Euclid Ave 675,000 (675,000) 21,606,862 101,002,452 - - 79, 395,590 Fund 4030 - Affordability In-Lieu
Vista Verde II Contribution to OHA/Agency Fund to OHA/Agency Fund 9,000,000 - - - ( 9,000,000) MS2304 Mountain & D Street Property Acquisition Contribution to OHA/Agency Fund from the Affordability In Lieu Fund 1,500,000 - - - ( 1,500,000) 10,500,000 - - - ( 10,500,000) Fund 4310 - Old Model Colony - Fire Impact
Fire Station 1 Budget Adjustment from NMC Fire impact to OMC Fire Impact 186,667 - - - ( 186,667) 186,667 - - - ( 186,667) Fund 4410 - Ontario Ranch - Fire Impact
Fire Station 1 Budget Adjustment from NMC Fire impact to OMC Fire Impact (186,667) - - - 186, 667 Adjustment to Fire Impact Fees revenues - (2,000,000) - - ( 2,000,000) NMC Fire Impact Transfer from NMC Public Services Transfer Reversal - - ( 4,000,000) - ( 4,000,000) (186,667) (2,000,000) (4,000,000) - ( 5,813,333) Fund 4411 - Ontario Ranch - Local Adjacent Fiber
DIF refunds of building permits and /or DIF reimbursements paid to date 350,000 - - - ( 350,000) 350,000 - - - ( 350,000) Fund 4412 - Ontario Ranch - Local Adjacent Sewer
DIF refunds of building permits and /or DIF reimbursements paid to date 520,000 - - - ( 520,000) 520,000 - - - ( 520,000) Fund 4413 - Ontario Ranch - Local Adjacent Streets
DIF refunds of building permits and /or DIF reimbursements paid to date 660,000 - - - ( 660,000) 660,000 - - - ( 660,000) Fund 4414 - Ontario Ranch - Local Adjacent Storm Drain
DIF refunds of building permits and /or DIF reimbursements paid to date 1,500,000 - - - ( 1,500,000) 1,500,000 - - - ( 1,500,000) Fund 4415 - Ontario Ranch - Local Adjacent Storm Drain
DIF refunds of building permits and /or DIF reimbursements paid to date 1,650,000 - - - ( 1,650,000) 1,650,000 - - - ( 1,650,000) Fund 4419 - Ontario Ranch - Regional Streets
DIF refunds of building permits and /or DIF reimbursements paid to date 1,700,000 - - - ( 1,700,000) 1,700,000 - - - ( 1,700,000) Fund 4420 - Ontario Ranch - Regional Water
DIF refunds of building permits and /or DIF reimbursements paid to date 1,000,000 - - - ( 1,000,000) 1,000,000 - - - ( 1,000,000) -
CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS TOTAL 39,486,862 99,002,452 ( 4,000,000) - 5 5,515,590

EXHIBIT A
18 88
Appropriation Revenue Operating Operating Fund Balance
Description Adjustments Adjustments Transfers-In Transfers-Out Impact City of Ontario
Detail of Recommended Budget Adjustments by Fund
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update

ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Fund 5011 - Water Capital
MS1707_5011 Utility Billing System Upgrade Budget Revision (1,710) - - - 1, 710 Budget Revision for Euclid Avenue Recycled Water System WA1502 (10,000,000) - - - 10, 000,000 Budget Revision for Water Main Improvements WA2303 (9,000,000) - - - 9, 000,000 (19,001,710) - - - 19,001,710 Fund 5111 - Sewer Capital
MS1707_5111 Utility Billing System Upgrade Budget Revision (8,611) - - - 8,611 Budget Revision for Vineyard Sanitary Sewer Project SE1902 (5,000,000) - - - 5,000,000 (5,008,611) - - - 5,008,611 Fund 5210 - Integrated Waste
MS1707_5210 Utility Billing System Upgrade Budget Revision (212) - - - 212 Used Oil Grant (OPP13) FY 2022-23 27,200 27,200 - - - Beverage Container Recycling Grant FY 2022-23 44,901 44,901 - - - Additional Appropriations for Integrated Waste Residential Landfill Disposal for higher volumes of organic waste. 327,000 - - - (327,000) 398,889 72,101 - - (326,788) ENTERPRISE FUNDS TOTAL (23,611,432) 72,101 - - 2 3,683,533

INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
Fund 6010 - Equipment Services
Emergency Vehicle Purchase for Police Department Transfer from General Fund - OIAA/DOJ Settlement Funds for Law Enforcement Services at ONT 110,000 - - - ( 110,000) Additional Appropriations for Procurement of Tires and Cost Increase 160,000 - - - ( 160,000) Funding for Police Department Fleet Shop Inventory Parts 100,000 - - - ( 100,000) Equipment Services Transfer from General Fund - - 1, 110,000 - 1, 110,000 Additional Appropriations for Natural Gas Cost Increase 1,100,000 - - - ( 1,100,000) 1,470,000 - 1,110,000 - ( 360,000) Fund 6020 - Information Technology
IT Telecommunication Services Budget Revision 360,000 - - - ( 360,000) IT Fund Transfer for Equipment from General Fund - - 1, 000,000 - 1, 000,000 360,000 - 1,000,000 - 640,000 Fund 6030 - Facilities & Parks Maintenance
Additional Appropriations for Fleet Services Shop at PD Project for contingency for construction and purchase of IT equipment. 100,000 - - - (100,000) Project Closeout for Climatec Loan (2,898,220) - - - 2,898,220 Additional Appropriations for emergency mold/ACM remediation, roof, plumbing, HVAC repairs and new roll up doors. 150,000 - - - (150,000) Additional Appropriations to paint king standard lights (Euclid Ave, Armsley Ave, Ontario Museum of History and Art, and Amtrack Station). 39,000 - - - (39,000) Facilities & Parks Maintenance Transfer from General Fund - - 5,000,000 - 5,000,000 (2,609,220) - 5,000,000 - 7, 609,220

EXHIBIT A
19 89
Appropriation Revenue Operating Operating Fund Balance
Description Adjustments Adjustments Transfers-In Transfers-Out Impact City of Ontario
Detail of Recommended Budget Adjustments by Fund
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Third Quarter Budget Update
Fund 6210 - Pension Benefit Fund
Move MS1805 West Euclid Revitalization Project from Pension Benefit to Economic Development Activities Fund (7,613,846) - - - 7,613,846 Move MS2101 Airport EDA Project Area Project from Pension Benefit to Economic Development Activities Fund (1,537,391) - - - 1,537,391 Move MS2104 Redevelopment NWC State & Bon View Project from Pension Benefit to Economic Development Activities Fund (53,764) - - - 53,764 RSIP UAL Revenue Adjustment - 15,608,551 - - 15,608,551 (9,205,001) 15,608,551 - - 24,813,552 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS TOTAL (9,984,221) 15,608,551 7,110,000 - 32,702,772 TOTAL CITY FUNDS BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS 36,181,225 128,507,208 5, 110,000 5, 110,000 92, 325,983 -
Fund 2310 - Ontario Housing Authority -
MS2304 Mountain & D Street Property Acquisition Contribution from Affordability in Lieu 1,500,000 1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 - - - -
AGENCY FUNDS TOTAL 1,500,000 1,500,000 - - - -
TOTAL ALL FUNDS BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS 37,681,225 130,007,208 5, 110,000 5, 110,000 92, 325,983

EXHIBIT A
20 90
RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,

CALIFORNIA, SETTING THE COMPENSATION OF THE CITY CLERK

AND CITY TREASURER AND RESCINDING PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
NO. 2014-016.

WHEREAS, the City Council last reviewed and adjusted the salary compensation of the City Clerk and City Treasurer positions in March 2014 and such adjustments were effective after the election in November 2014; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2014-016 on March 4, 2014 to amend Sections 2-3.501(a) and 2-3.502(a) of the Ontario Municipal Code providing that the salaries for the City Clerk and City Treasurer positions shall be fixed by action of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the salaries for the City Clerk and City Treasurer positions and desires to adjust such salaries.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Pursuant to Section 2-3.501(a) of Chapter 3, Title 2, Article 5 of the Ontario Municipal Code, the compensation of the City Clerk shall be One-Thousand- seven hundred-fifty-six dollars ($1,756.00) per month.

SECTION 2. Pursuant to Section 2-3.502(a) of Chapter 3, Title 2, Article 5 of the Ontario Municipal Code, the compensation of the City Treasurer shall be One- Thousand-seven hundred-fifty-six dollars ($1,756.00) per month.

SECTION 3. The compensation of the City Clerk and the City Treasurer set by this resolution shall become effective upon the adoption of this Resolution.

SECTION 4. Previous Resolution No. 2014-016 is hereby repealed to the extent it is inconsistent with the provisions of this Resolution.

The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of May 2023. _____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
91 ATTEST:
____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP

CITY ATTORNEY
92 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
93 EXHIBIT B

Part-Time Grade Table - Effective 5/21/2023
GRADE STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 STEP 7 STEP 8 STEP 9 STEP 10 PT1 $15.75 $16.14 $16.55 $16.96 $17.39 $17.82 $18.27 $18.72 $19.19 $19.67 PT2 $16.14 $16.55 $16.96 $17.39 $17.82 $18.27 $18.72 $19.19 $19.67 $20.16 PT3 $16.55 $16.96 $17.39 $17.82 $18.27 $18.72 $19.19 $19.67 $20.16 $20.67 PT4 $16.96 $17.39 $17.82 $18.27 $18.72 $19.19 $19.67 $20.16 $20.67 $21.18 PT5 $17.39 $17.82 $18.27 $18.72 $19.19 $19.67 $20.16 $20.67 $21.18 $21.71 PT6 $17.82 $18.27 $18.72 $19.19 $19.67 $20.16 $20.67 $21.18 $21.71 $22.25 PT7 $18.27 $18.72 $19.19 $19.67 $20.16 $20.67 $21.18 $21.71 $22.25 $22.81 PT8 $18.72 $19.19 $19.67 $20.16 $20.67 $21.18 $21.71 $22.25 $22.81 $23.38 PT9 $19.19 $19.67 $20.16 $20.67 $21.18 $21.71 $22.25 $22.81 $23.38 $23.97 PT10 $19.67 $20.16 $20.67 $21.18 $21.71 $22.25 $22.81 $23.38 $23.97 $24.56 PT11 $20.16 $20.67 $21.18 $21.71 $22.25 $22.81 $23.38 $23.97 $24.56 $25.18 PT12 $20.67 $21.18 $21.71 $22.25 $22.81 $23.38 $23.97 $24.56 $25.18 $25.81 PT13 $21.18 $21.71 $22.25 $22.81 $23.38 $23.97 $24.56 $25.18 $25.81 $26.45 PT14 $21.71 $22.25 $22.81 $23.38 $23.97 $24.56 $25.18 $25.81 $26.45 $27.11 PT15 $22.25 $22.81 $23.38 $23.97 $24.56 $25.18 $25.81 $26.45 $27.11 $27.79 PT16 $22.81 $23.38 $23.97 $24.56 $25.18 $25.81 $26.45 $27.11 $27.79 $28.49 PT17 $23.38 $23.97 $24.56 $25.18 $25.81 $26.45 $27.11 $27.79 $28.49 $29.20 PT18 $23.97 $24.56 $25.18 $25.81 $26.45 $27.11 $27.79 $28.49 $29.20 $29.93 PT19 $24.56 $25.18 $25.81 $26.45 $27.11 $27.79 $28.49 $29.20 $29.93 $30.68 PT20 $25.18 $25.81 $26.45 $27.11 $27.79 $28.49 $29.20 $29.93 $30.68 $31.44 PT21 $25.81 $26.45 $27.11 $27.79 $28.49 $29.20 $29.93 $30.68 $31.44 $32.23 PT22 $26.45 $27.11 $27.79 $28.49 $29.20 $29.93 $30.68 $31.44 $32.23 $33.04 PT23 $27.11 $27.79 $28.49 $29.20 $29.93 $30.68 $31.44 $32.23 $33.04 $33.86 PT24 $27.79 $28.49 $29.20 $29.93 $30.68 $31.44 $32.23 $33.04 $33.86 $34.71 PT25 $28.49 $29.20 $29.93 $30.68 $31.44 $32.23 $33.04 $33.86 $34.71 $35.58

94 Department: Development Administration
Prepared By: Derrick E Womble
Staff Member Presenting:

Scott Murphy, Executive Director Community
Development
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 11
SUBJECT:

A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO UPDATE THE

CITY'S DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (DIF) MASTER FACILITIES PLAN

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
May 16, 2023
SECTION:

PUBLIC HEARINGS

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council consider and adopt a Resolution to update the City's Development Impact Fees (DIF) Master Facilities Plan.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Invest in the Growth and Evolution of the City's Economy Operate in a Businesslike Manner
Invest in the City's Infrastructure (Water, Streets, Sewers, Parks, Storm Drains and Public Facilities)
FISCAL IMPACT:

The proposed update of the Development Impact Fees (DIF) Master Facilities Plan (the "MFP") continues to reﬂect the City Council's direction that new development pays its fair share of the costs for infrastructure and that costs of development in the Ontario Ranch do not impact existing residents.

The update of the City's MFP is conducted periodically to reﬂect modiﬁcations to speciﬁc DIF Projects based on changes in projected infrastructure needs, actual costs, revised engineering estimates and scope of work. The MFP update deﬁnes the current costs of infrastructure included in the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Update Report (the "DIF Nexus Report"), which was previously approved by the City Council on August 16, 2022. There is no General Fund impact from adopting the update to the MFP.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

On August 16, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022- 133, updating and modifying the Development Impact Fees (DIF) and approving the DIF Nexus Report. The modified Fees became effective January 1, 2023.

Per Assembly Bill 602, jurisdictions are required to adopt a capital improvement plan as part of a nexus study for impact fees. The proposed MFP complies with this requirement. Therefore, in support of the DIF Nexus Report, Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC (“Consultant”) prepared comprehensive updates to the MFP. The MFP includes a scope of work/description, justiﬁcation, and relationship to The Ontario Plan for each DIF Project identified in the DIF Nexus Report.

95 It is important to note the MFP does not increase, modify, or change any of the existing fees set by Resolution No. 2022-133. All fee amounts pursuant to the Resolution shall remain in full force and in effect.

The MFP may be amended from time to time by Resolution of the City Council, in compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act, Government Code, 66000 et. seq. Furthermore, the proposed MFP complies with State law and the City's existing DIF Program Policies. Therefore, staﬀ is recommending approval of the MFP.
96 RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (DIF)
MASTER FACILITIES PLAN UPDATE.

WHEREAS, on July 1, 2003, the City Council of the City of Ontario (the "City Council") adopted Ordinance Nos. 2779 and 2780 to implement new and modified Development Impact Fees in recognition of the need to finance adequate infrastructure and other public improvements and facilities made necessary by new development in the City of Ontario ("City"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council previously adopted Resolution No. 2003-039 to establish policies for the implementation of the new and modified Development Impact Fees; Resolution No. 2003-070 to establish additional definitions and policies for the application of Development Impact Fees; and Resolution Nos. 2005-005, 2005-099, 2007-023, 2007-150, 2011-011, 2012-092, 2015-008, 2017-102, 2019-135, and 2022-133 to update and modify Development Impact Fee amounts; and WHEREAS, City staff and Revenue and Costs Specialists LLC, have reviewed the DIF Program and the infrastructure Master Plans and produced the Development Impact Fee Master Facilities Plan Update (the “Master Facilities Plan”) for the City of Ontario; and
WHEREAS, the Master Facilities Plan includes a scope of work, justification, and relationship to The Ontario Plan, for each DIF Project identified in the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report, which was previously approved by the City Council on August 16, 2022, by Resolution No. 2022-133; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Assembly Bill 602 (“AB 602”), jurisdictions shall adopt a capital improvement plan as part of a nexus study, for which the proposed Master Facilities Plan Update complies this requirement; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Master Facilities Plan does not change or modify any existing Fee amounts identified in Resolution No. 2022-133, and all Fee amounts pursuant to the Resolution shall remain in full force and effect; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 66000, et seq. and AB 602, a copy of the above referenced Master Facilities Plan has been made available for inspection by the public at Ontario City Hall for thirty (30) calendar days prior to the adoption of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, on May 16, 2023, the City Council of the City of Ontario conducted a hearing to consider the Master Facilities Plan, and concluded said hearing on that date; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 97 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2. This Resolution does not change or modify any Fee amounts previously adopted by the City Council in Resolution No. 2022-133, and all Fee amounts pursuant to the Resolution shall remain in full force and effect.

SECTION 3. The City Council hereby adopts the Master Facilities Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, and incorporated herein by this reference.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of May 2023. _____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________

CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
________________________________

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP

CITY ATTORNEY
98 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
99 "EXHIBIT A"
City of Ontario
Development Impact Fee
Master Facilities Plan Update
(Master Facilities Plan Update to follow this page)
100
DRAFT
101
DRAFT
102
DRAFT
103
DRAFT
104
DRAFT
105
DRAFT
106
DRAFT
107
DRAFT
108
DRAFT
109
DRAFT
110
DRAFT
111
DRAFT
112
DRAFT
113
DRAFT
114
DRAFT
115
DRAFT
116
DRAFT
117
DRAFT
118
DRAFT
119
DRAFT
120
DRAFT
121
DRAFT
122
DRAFT
123
DRAFT
124
DRAFT
125
DRAFT
126
DRAFT
127
DRAFT
128
DRAFT
129
DRAFT
130
DRAFT
131
DRAFT
132
DRAFT
133
DRAFT
134
DRAFT
135
DRAFT
136
DRAFT
137
DRAFT
138
DRAFT
139
DRAFT
140
DRAFT
141
DRAFT
142
DRAFT
143
DRAFT
144
DRAFT
145
DRAFT
146
DRAFT
147
DRAFT
148
DRAFT
149
DRAFT
150
DRAFT
151
DRAFT
152
DRAFT
153
DRAFT
154
DRAFT
155
DRAFT
156
DRAFT
157
DRAFT
158
DRAFT
159
DRAFT
160
DRAFT
161
DRAFT
162
DRAFT
163
DRAFT
164
DRAFT
165
DRAFT
166
DRAFT
167
DRAFT
168
DRAFT
169
DRAFT
170
DRAFT
171
DRAFT
172
DRAFT
173
DRAFT
174
DRAFT
175
DRAFT
176
DRAFT
177
DRAFT
178
DRAFT
179
DRAFT
180
DRAFT
181
DRAFT
182
DRAFT
183
DRAFT
184
DRAFT
185
DRAFT
186
DRAFT
187
DRAFT
188
DRAFT
189
DRAFT
190
DRAFT
191
DRAFT
192
DRAFT
193
DRAFT
194
DRAFT
195
DRAFT
196
DRAFT
197
DRAFT
198
DRAFT
199
DRAFT
200
DRAFT
201
DRAFT
202
DRAFT
203
DRAFT
204
DRAFT
205
DRAFT
206
DRAFT
207
DRAFT
208
DRAFT
209
DRAFT
210
DRAFT
211
DRAFT
212
DRAFT
213
DRAFT
214
DRAFT
215
DRAFT
216
DRAFT
217
DRAFT
218
DRAFT
219
DRAFT
220
DRAFT
221
DRAFT
222
DRAFT
223
DRAFT
224
DRAFT
225
DRAFT
226
DRAFT
227
DRAFT
228
DRAFT
229
DRAFT
230
DRAFT
231
DRAFT
232
DRAFT
233
DRAFT
234
DRAFT
235
DRAFT
236
DRAFT
237
DRAFT
238
DRAFT
239
DRAFT
240
DRAFT
241
DRAFT
242
DRAFT
243
DRAFT
244
DRAFT
245
DRAFT
246
DRAFT
247
DRAFT
248
DRAFT
249
DRAFT
250
DRAFT
251
DRAFT
252
DRAFT
253
DRAFT
254
DRAFT
255
DRAFT
256
DRAFT
257
DRAFT
258
DRAFT
259
DRAFT
260
DRAFT
261
DRAFT
262
DRAFT
263
DRAFT
264
DRAFT
265
DRAFT
266
DRAFT
267
DRAFT
268
DRAFT
269
DRAFT
270
DRAFT
271
DRAFT
272
DRAFT
273
DRAFT
274
DRAFT
275
DRAFT
276
DRAFT
277
DRAFT
278
DRAFT
279
DRAFT
280
DRAFT
281
DRAFT
282
DRAFT
283
DRAFT
284
DRAFT
285
DRAFT
286
DRAFT
287
DRAFT
288
DRAFT
289
DRAFT
290
DRAFT
291
DRAFT
292
DRAFT
293
DRAFT
294
DRAFT
295
DRAFT
296
DRAFT
297
DRAFT
298
DRAFT
299
DRAFT
300
DRAFT
301
DRAFT
302
DRAFT
303
DRAFT
304
DRAFT
305
DRAFT
306
DRAFT
307
DRAFT
308
DRAFT
309
DRAFT
310
DRAFT
311
DRAFT
312
DRAFT
313
DRAFT
314
DRAFT
315
DRAFT
316
DRAFT
317
DRAFT
318
DRAFT
319
DRAFT
320
DRAFT
321
DRAFT
322
DRAFT
323
DRAFT
324
DRAFT
325
DRAFT
326
DRAFT
327
DRAFT
328
DRAFT
329
DRAFT
330
DRAFT
331
DRAFT
332
DRAFT
333
DRAFT
334
DRAFT
335
DRAFT
336
DRAFT
337
DRAFT
338
DRAFT
339
DRAFT
340
DRAFT
341
DRAFT
342
DRAFT
343
DRAFT
344
DRAFT
345
DRAFT
346
DRAFT
347
DRAFT
348
DRAFT
349
DRAFT
350
DRAFT
351
DRAFT
352
DRAFT
353
DRAFT
354
DRAFT
355
DRAFT
356
DRAFT
357
DRAFT
358
DRAFT
359
DRAFT
360
DRAFT
361
DRAFT
362
DRAFT
363
DRAFT
364
DRAFT
365
DRAFT
366
DRAFT
367
DRAFT
368
DRAFT
369
DRAFT
370
DRAFT
371
DRAFT
372
DRAFT
373
DRAFT
374
DRAFT
375
DRAFT
376
DRAFT
377
DRAFT
378
DRAFT
379
DRAFT
380
DRAFT
381
DRAFT
382
DRAFT
383
DRAFT
384
DRAFT
385
DRAFT
386
DRAFT
387
DRAFT
388
DRAFT
389
DRAFT
390
DRAFT
391
DRAFT
392
DRAFT
393
DRAFT
394
DRAFT
395
DRAFT
396
DRAFT
397
DRAFT
398
DRAFT
399
DRAFT
400
DRAFT
401
DRAFT
402
DRAFT
403
DRAFT
404
DRAFT
405
DRAFT
406
DRAFT
407
DRAFT
408
DRAFT
409
DRAFT
410
DRAFT
411
DRAFT
412
DRAFT
413
DRAFT
414
DRAFT
415
DRAFT
416
DRAFT
417
DRAFT
418
DRAFT
419
DRAFT
420
DRAFT
421
DRAFT
422
DRAFT
423
DRAFT
424
DRAFT
425
DRAFT
426
DRAFT
427
DRAFT
428
DRAFT
429
DRAFT
430
DRAFT
431
DRAFT
432
DRAFT
433
DRAFT
434
DRAFT
435
DRAFT
436
DRAFT
437
DRAFT
438
DRAFT
439
DRAFT
440
DRAFT
441
DRAFT
442
DRAFT
443
DRAFT
444
DRAFT
445
DRAFT
446
DRAFT
447
DRAFT
448
DRAFT
449
DRAFT
450
DRAFT
451
DRAFT
452
DRAFT
453
DRAFT
454
DRAFT
455
DRAFT
456
DRAFT
457
DRAFT
458
DRAFT
459
DRAFT
460
DRAFT
461
DRAFT
462
DRAFT
463
DRAFT
464
DRAFT
465
DRAFT
466
DRAFT
467
DRAFT
468
DRAFT
469
DRAFT
470
DRAFT
471
DRAFT
472
DRAFT
473
DRAFT
474
DRAFT
475
DRAFT
476
DRAFT
477
DRAFT
478
DRAFT
479
DRAFT
480
DRAFT
481
DRAFT
482
DRAFT
483
DRAFT
484
DRAFT
485
DRAFT
486
DRAFT
487
DRAFT
488
DRAFT
489
DRAFT
490
DRAFT
491
DRAFT
492
DRAFT
493
DRAFT
494
DRAFT
495
DRAFT
496
DRAFT
497
DRAFT
498
DRAFT
499
DRAFT
500
DRAFT
501
DRAFT
502
DRAFT
503
DRAFT
504
DRAFT
505
DRAFT
506
DRAFT
507
DRAFT
508
DRAFT
509
DRAFT
510
DRAFT
511
DRAFT
512
DRAFT
513
DRAFT
514
DRAFT
515
DRAFT
516
DRAFT
517
DRAFT
518
DRAFT
519
DRAFT
520
DRAFT
521
DRAFT
522
DRAFT
523
DRAFT
524
DRAFT
525
DRAFT
526
DRAFT
527
DRAFT
528
DRAFT
529
DRAFT
530
DRAFT
531
DRAFT
532
DRAFT
533
DRAFT
534
DRAFT
535
DRAFT
536
DRAFT
537
DRAFT
538
DRAFT
539
DRAFT
540
DRAFT
541
DRAFT
542
DRAFT
543
DRAFT
544
DRAFT
545
DRAFT
546
DRAFT
547
DRAFT
548
DRAFT
549
DRAFT
550
DRAFT
551
DRAFT
552
DRAFT
553
DRAFT
554
Department: Planning
Prepared By: Diane Ayala
Staff Member Presenting:

Scott Murphy, Executive Director Community
Development
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 12
SUBJECT:

A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER FILE NO. PUD22-005, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR A 2.38-ACRE PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED AT

THE NORTHEAST

CORNER OF EUCLID AVENUE AND D STREET, BORDERED BY E STREET ON THE

NORTH AND LEMON AVENUE ON THE EAST

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
May 16, 2023
SECTION:

PUBLIC HEARINGS

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council introduce and waive further reading of an Ordinance approving File No. PUD22-005, the D Block Planned Unit Development, establishing development standards and design guidelines to facilitate a commercial and residential mixed-use development located at the northeast corner of Euclid Avenue and D Street.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Invest in the Growth and Evolution of the City's Economy Operate in a Businesslike Manner
Focus Resources in Ontario's Commercial and Residential Neighborhoods FISCAL IMPACT:

There is not a direct ﬁscal impact associated with this action. The proposed D Block Planned Unit Development (PUD) establishes development standards and guidelines to facilitate the development of commercial and residential mixture of use. Implementation of the PUD would result in an increase in property taxes from future development and the one-time payment to the City for plan check fees and development impact fees.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

On June 8, 2022, the Ontario Place D Block, LLC., ﬁled a Planned Unit Development (“PUD”) application, File No. PUD22-005, in conjunction with a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 20556), File No. PMTT22-019, a Development Plan, File No. PDEV22-031, and a Certiﬁcate of Appropriateness, File No. PHP22-010, to facilitate construction of a commercial and residential mixed-use development.

The Project site is comprised of 2.38 acres of land located within the historic downtown, at the northeast corner of Euclid Avenue and D Street, bordered by E Street on the north and Lemon Avenue on the east, within the LUA-1 (Euclid Avenue Entertainment) of the MU-1 (Downtown Mixed- Use) and Euclid Avenue Overlay zoning districts. The Project site is developed with a vacant commercial retail center, paved surface parking lot, and 3 automatic teller machines that have been 555
recently removed. The commercial retail center was constructed during the 1960s and then remodeled during the early 2000s.

On the same block, at the northwest corner, is a 0.12-acre lot that is improved with a fueling station.

The block south of the Project site is developed with a 5-level public parking structure and vacant land slated for construction of a mixed-use development consisting of 144 residential apartment units and approximately 4,050 square feet of ground ﬂoor retail. Other surrounding land uses include commercial to the west, across Euclid Avenue, and a mixture of retail and oﬃce to the east and north.

The Policy Plan speciﬁes that the Downtown Mixed-Use Area is to be implemented through the approval of an Area Plan or Planned Unit Development prior to the development of properties. In compliance with this requirement, the Applicant has submitted the D Block Planned Unit Development (included as Attachment "A" to the Ordinance), which is consistent with this vision, goals, and policies of the Policy Plan. A Planned Unit Development is comparable to a Speciﬁc Plan in that it establishes development regulations that are unique to a speciﬁc area. However, it is unlike a Speciﬁc Plan in that a Planned Unit Development is typically intended to apply to a single development project or several interrelated development projects that function together as a single, comprehensive project.

Key components of the D Block Planned Unit Development include the following:

Land Use and Development Regulations
— The MU-1 (Downtown Mixed Use) zoning district
allows for commercial and residential mixed-use development at a density of 25.1 to 75 dwelling units per acre and a building intensity of 2.0 Floor Area Ratio. Consistent with the MU-1 zoning district and TOP Downtown District Place Type, the D Block PUD allows for development of 60 to 178 dwelling units, with a maximum building height of 55 feet (4 stories) and up to 65 feet for architectural projections and elevators.

Landscaping

— The landscaping concept is centered around the use of sustainable and low water use plant materials. As an example, varying species of evergreen and deciduous trees with interest in form and foliage color may be integrated in the landscape design. Pattern and planting should accentuate the common open space areas and create a visible connection to pedestrian pathways and sidewalks. The PUD also requires the landscaping be drought tolerant and irrigation meet the current Water Use Classiﬁcations of Landscape Species requirements. Due to building placement, the use of container landscapes is encouraged and may be used along street frontages.

Parking and Circulation
— In order to achieve the preferred density and building intensities, the PUD allows for a combination of on-site and on-street parking to provide an adequate parking supply to meet the anticipated parking demand for the Project. All resident parking will be provided on site, while guest parking and retail visitor spaces will be provided on- street. The Project site is located within a mixed-use area where on-street parking is available along the Project frontage and on surrounding blocks.

Access to Mass Transit
— An existing bus stop is located on the northeast corner of Euclid Avenue and D Street for Omnitrans Route 83. Additionally, located near Euclid Avenue on Holt 556
Boulevard is Omnitrans Route 61 which has been identiﬁed as the future West Valley Connector Bus Rapid Transit (BRT).

Architectural Character
— The PUD includes architectural design guidelines, speciﬁc to the downtown location and mixed-use building type, and establishes the following design principles:

Create an architectural character that reﬂects the various styles within the historic downtown by using similar proportions, building details and building material; New buildings should appear to ﬁt in contextually with existing historic buildings by using similar proportions, articulation, building details and building material; The overall character should feel like a modern interpretation of a traditional American small town; and
Create compatibility between the mixed-use architecture and the residential architecture within the downtown area; the introduction of unifying elements such as similar materials and colors should be considered; however, “sameness” is discouraged.

On April 25, 2023, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the Project and concluded the hearing on that date. After considering all public testimony on the application, the Planning Commission voted unanimously (6-0) to approve a Resolution recommending that the City Council approve the D Block Planned Unit Development. At the same meeting, Planning Commission approved the related Tentative Tract Map, Development Plan, and Certiﬁcate of Appropriateness contingent upon City Council approval of the PUD.

HOUSING ELEMENT COMPLIANCE:

The Project is consistent with the Housing Element of the Policy Plan (General Plan) component of The Ontario Plan, as the Project site is not one of the properties in the Housing Element Sites contained in Tables B-1 and B-2 (Housing Element Sites Inventory) of the Housing Element Technical Report.

AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILITY PLAN (ALUCP) COMPLIANCE
: The California State
Aeronautics Act (Public Utilities Code Section 21670 et seq.) requires that an Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan be prepared for all public use airports in the State; and requires that local land use plans and individual development proposals must be consistent with the policies set forth in the adopted Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. On April 19, 2011, the City Council of the City of Ontario approved and adopted the ONT ALUCP, establishing the Airport Inﬂuence Area for Ontario International Airport, which encompasses lands within parts of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties, and limits future land uses and development within the Airport Inﬂuence Area, as they relate to noise, safety, airspace protection, and overﬂight impacts of current and future airport activity. As the decision-making body for the Project, the City Council has reviewed and considered the facts and information contained in the Application and supporting documentation against the ONT ALUCP compatibility factors, including [1] Safety Criteria (ONT ALUCP Table 2-2) and Safety Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-2), [2] Noise Criteria (ONT ALUCP Table 2-3) and Noise Impact Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-3), [3] Airspace protection Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-4), and [4] Overﬂight Notiﬁcation Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-5). As a result, the City Council, therefore, ﬁnds and determines that the Project, when implemented in conjunction with the conditions of approval, will be consistent with the policies and criteria set forth within the ONT ALUCP. 557
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The Project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32, In-ﬁll Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines, and meets all of the following conditions:

The proposed Project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations.

The proposed Project is located within the Downtown Mixed Use land use designation of the Policy Plan (general plan) Land Use Map, and the MU-1/LUA-1 (Downtown Mixed Use/Euclid Avenue Entertainment) zoning district. The proposed Project is consistent with all applicable Policy Plan policies, as well as with the requirements of the MU-1/LUA-1 (Downtown Mixed Use/Euclid Avenue Entertainment) zoning district and the related proposed D Block Planned Unit Development, which, at the Project location, intends to accommodate housing units at a density of 25 to 75 du/ac.

The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than ﬁve acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The Project is proposed within the established boundaries of the City of Ontario, on a project site totaling 2.38-acres of land, which is surrounded by established development on all sides and consists of a mix of multiple-family, civic, retail, and commercial land uses.

The Project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. The site is located in an urbanized area that has been fully developed with a commercial building and a large, paved surface for vehicular parking, and as such is not suitable habitat for any endangered, rare, or threatened species. Additionally, the site has not been identiﬁed on federal or state designation map.

Approval of the Project would not result in any signiﬁcant eﬀects relating to traﬃc, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed mixed-use commercial and residential development is similar to, and of no greater impact than other allowed uses and development projects within the MU-1/LUA-1 (Downtown Mixed Use/Euclid Avenue Entertainment) zoning district. The Project would not result in any signiﬁcant impacts through implementation of required state, regional, and local development and performance standards, and as demonstrated in the Air Quality and GHG, Noise, Traﬃc, and Parking Studies, and the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan ("PWQMP") prepared for the Project.

The site is adequately served by all required utilities and public services. All necessary wet and dry utilities are within the public street and are readily available for connection; and The application of the categorical exemption is not barred by one of the exceptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.
558
Case Planner: Diane Ayala Hearing Body Date Decision Action Planning Director
Approval:

DAB April 3, 2023 Approval Recommend
PC April 25, 2023
Submittal Date: June 8, 2022 CC
F
ILE NOS: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 SU
BJECT: A public hearing to consider: [1] a Planned Unit Development (File No. PUD22- 005) t
o establish development and performance standards and design guidelines for the project site; [2] Tentative Tract Map No. 20556 (File No. PMTT22-019), consolidating 4 lots into one lot; [3] a D evelopment Plan (File No. PDEV22 -031) to construct a mixed -use d
evelopment consisting of 1 09 residential apartment units and approximately 4,0 50 square feet of ground floor retail; and [4] a Certificate of Appropriateness (File No. PHP22- 010) to determine appropriateness of the infill development adjacent to a designated historic landmark on 2.38 acres of land within the LUA-1 (Euclid Avenue Entertainment) of the MU-1 (Downtown Mixed Use) zoning district located at the northeast corner of Euclid Avenue and D Street, bordered by E Street on the north and Lemon Avenue on the east; (APNs: 1048-363-05, 1048- 363-04, 1048-363- 03 and 1048 -363-02) submitted by Ontario Place D Block LLC. City Council action is required for File No. PUD22-005.

PR
OPERTY OWNER: City of Ontario
R
ECOMMENDED ACTION: That the Planning/Historic Preservation Commission consider and approve File No s. PUD22 -005,
PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22 -010,
pursuant to the facts and reasons
contained in the s taff report and
attached resolutions, and subject to the
conditions of approval appended to the
attached resolutions as "Attachment A.”
P
ROJECT SETTING: The Project site is
comprised of 2.38 acres of land located
within the historic downtown, at the
northeast corner of Euclid Avenue and D
Street, bordered by E Street on the north
and Lemon Avenue on the east , within
the LUA-1 (Euclid Avenue Entertainment)
of the MU-1 (Downtown Mixed-Use) and
Euclid Avenue Overlay zoning district s
(see Figure 1: Project Location ). The
Project site is developed with a vacant
Figure 1: Project Location
303 East B Street, Ontario, California 91764 Phone: 909.395.2036 / Fax: 909.395.2420

PLANNING COMMISSION

AGENDA REPORT
April 25, 2023
Approved
Final / PUDMay 16, 2023
Final
559
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 2 of 29 ends

commercial retail center, paved surface parking lot, and 3 automatic teller machines that have been recently removed. The commercial retail center was constructed during the 1960s and then remodeled during the early 2000s.

On the same block, at the northwest corner, is a 0.12 -acre lot that is improved with a fueling station. The block south of the Project s ite is developed with a 5 -level public parking structure and vacant land slated for construction of a mixed -use development consisting of 14 4 residential apartment units and approximately 4,050 square feet of ground floor retail. Other surrounding land use s include commercial to the west, across Euclid Avenue, and a mixture of retail and office to the east and north. The existing surrounding land uses, zoning, and Policy Plan (general plan) land use designations are summarized in the " Surrounding Zoning & Land Uses " table located in the Technical Appendix of this report.

PROJECT ANALYSIS:

(1) B
ackground — On July 5, 2022, the City Council approved a Disposition and Development Agreement (“DDA”) with the Applicant for a mutual benefit that would further The Ontario Plan (TOP) Policy Plan (general plan) goals of an intensive mixture of retail, office, and residential uses in a pedestrian friendly atmosphere, while ensuring that the historic character of the Downtown is preserved. As stipulated in the DDA, the City is responsible for preparing the site through relocation of existing businesses and building demolition to deliver a “shovel ready” Project site to the Applicant.

T
he Applicant filed a request for approval of the D Block Planned Unit Development (“PUD”), File No. PUD22-005, and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 20556), File No. PMTT22-019, concurrently with a Development Plan , File No. PDEV22 -031, and a Certificate of Appropriateness, File No. PHP22 -010. Final approval of the Tentative Tract Map and Development Plan is contingent upon the City Council adopti on of the PUD for the Project site and Certificate of Appropriateness approval by the Historic Preservation Commission.

On April 3, 2023, the Development Advisory Board considered the subject Tentative Tract Map and Development Plan and recommended approval to the Planning Commission with conditions of approval. On April 12, 2023, the Historic Preservation Subcommittee considered the subject Certificate of Appropriateness and recommended approval to the Planning/Historic Preservation Commission.

(2) Pl
anned Unit Development (File No. PUD22 -005) — The LUA-1 (Euclid Avenue Entertainment) of the MU -1 (Downtown Mixed -Use) zoning district , requires the preparation and approval of a PUD to establish the development standards and design guidelines for the site. The proposed D Block PUD, appended to the attached resolution as "Attachment A,” identifies the following components:

560
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 3 of 29 ends

(a) Land Use and Development Regulations — The MU -1 (Downtown Mixed Use) zoning district allows for commercial and residential mixed -use development at a density of 25.1 to 75 dwelling units per acre and a building intensity of 2.0 Floor Area Ratio.

Consistent with the MU -1 zoning district and TOP Downtown District Place Type , the D Block PUD allows for development of 60 to 178 dwelling units, with a maximum building height of 55 feet (4 stories) and up to 65 feet for architectural projections and elevators.

(b) L andscaping — The landscaping concept is centered around the use of sustainable and low water use plant materials. As an example, varying species of evergreen and deciduous trees with interest in form and foliage color may be integrated in the landscape design. Pattern and planting should accentuate the common open space areas and create a visible connection to pedestrian pathways and sidewalks. The PUD also requires the landscaping and irrigation be dro ught tolerant and meet the current Water Use Classifications of Landscape Species requirements. Due to building placement, t he use of container landscapes is encouraged and may be used along street frontages.

(c) Pa
rking and Circulation — In order to achi eve the preferred density and building intensities, the PUD allows for a combination of on-site and on-street parking to provide an adequate parking supply to meet the anticipated parking demand for the Project. All resident parking will be provided on site, while guest parking and retail visitor spaces will be provided on -street. The Project site is located within a mixed -use area where on -street parking is available along the project frontage and on surrounding blocks.

(d) A ccess to Mass Transit — An existing bus stop is located on the north east corner of Euclid Avenue and D Street for Omnitrans Route 83. Additionally, located near Euclid Avenue on Holt Boulevard is Omnitrans Route 61 which has been identified as the future West Valley Connector Bus Rapid Transit (BRT).

(e) A
rchitectural Character — The PUD includes architectural design guidelines, specific to the downtown location and mixed -use building type, and establishes the following design principles:

(
i) Create an architectural character that reflects the various styles within the historic downtown by using similar proportions, building details and building material.

(ii) New buildings should appear to fit in contextually with existing historic buildings by using similar proportions, articulation, building details and building material.

(iii) The overall character should feel like a modern interpretation of a traditional American small town.

561
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 4 of 29 ends

(iv) Create compatibility between the mixed-use architecture and the residential architecture within the downtown area; the introduction of unifying elements such as similar materials and colors should be considered; however, “sameness” is discouraged.

(3) Te ntative Tract Map (File No. PMTT22 -019) — Tentative Tract Map No. 20556, which is depicted in Exhibit B: Tentative Tract Map, proposes to consolidate 4 parcels of land into a single lot and vacate the north-south and east-west running alleys located within the Project site, creating a single 2.38-acre parcel for development. This will facilitate the construction of 4,050 square feet of comme rcial space and 109 residential apartment units in a mixed-use development.

(4) D
evelopment Plan (File No. PDEV22 -031)

(a) S i
te Design/Building Layout — The Project proposes the construction of one mixed-use building consisting of 1 09 residential apartment units, at a density of 45.8 dwelling units per acre, and approximately 4,050 square feet of ground floor commercial uses, as depicted in Exhibit C: Site Plan, attached. The proposed L -shaped building will have 4 -stories, with an overall average height of 51 feet, and constructed with an approximate 3-foot setback from Euclid Avenue, an average of 6 -foot setback from D Street, an approximate 2-foot setback from Lemon Avenue, and a 10 to 20-foot setback from the adjacent primary recreation area and surface p arking lot located at the northeastern portion of the site. The residential perimeter is enclosed by a decorative 6 - foot tubular steel fence.

Th
e stacked-flat residential unit configuration will provide studio, one and 2 -bedroom apartments, as depicted in Exhibit D: Floor Plans . Oriented towards Euclid Avenue, the ground floor commercial units are divided by a mid-block pedestrian pass-thru that leads to a gated corridor accessing the residential units, amenity area, and parking lot.

Residential units, as described in the table below, will be accessible from interior hallways, 2 on-site elevators, and 2 interior stairwells. Each unit will have a private deck or patio, ranging in size from 60 to 90 square feet, that will be enclosed by a decorative pony wall.

A 1,100 -square-foot roof deck patio and an adjacent 500 -square-foot clubhouse is located on the fourth floor. Four commercial units, ranging in size from approximately 600 to 1,850 square feet, will have Euclid Avenue frontage. The remaining c ommercial units on the block, also designed as a traditional storefront, will house the administrative operations and provide space for indoor amenities, storage, and mailboxes for residential tenants.

Residential Floor Plans
Plan No. Area
(in SF)
No. Bedrooms No. Baths No. of Units
S1 374 studio 1 bath 7
A1 670 1 bedroom 1 bath 2
562
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 5 of 29 ends

A1.1 670 1 bedroom 1 bath 47
B1 1,019 2 bedrooms 2 baths 4
B1.1 1,019 2 bedrooms 2 baths 46
B2 980 2 bedrooms 2 baths 3
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS 109

(b) Si te Access/Circulation — The Project will have pedestrian access at multiple locations throughout the site. All commercial units will have direct access from Euclid Avenue. Residents will have secured and gated access to their units and amenity areas from Euclid Avenue, D Street, E Street, Lemon Avenue, and the surface parking lot.

V
ehicular access to the site will be limited to residents. The fully enclosed and gated parking lot is accessible from E Street via 3, 2 -way driveways that lead to 24 -foot-wide drive aisles that circulate through the parking lot.

(c) Pa rking — The Project requires 200 vehicle parking spaces as specified in the proposed D Block PUD and are shown in the table below. In order to achieve the preferred Project density, residential parking will be provided on-site, with guest and retail visitor parking available on surrounding public streets, parking lots, and the C Block parking structure.

Parking Summary
Type of Use
Building
Area (in SF) or No.

Units
Parking Ratio Spaces
Required Spaces Provided
Residential Units 162 bedrooms 1 space per
bedroom 162 162 (off-street)
Residential Guest 109 units 0.20 space per unit 22 22 (street and public parking lots)
Retail Units 4,050 SF 0.25 per GFA 16 16 (street and public parking lots)
TOTAL 200 200 (off-street, on-street,
and public parking lots)

The Project is designed to provide a total of 162 residential parking spaces on -site (including 23 tandem spaces) , and 38 retail and visitor parking spaces will be accommodated on-street. To determine the availability of on-street and public parking spaces surrounding the Project site, a parking study was conducted in November 2022 by RK Engineering Group , Inc. and is includ ed as Attachment B -3 (Parking Study) . The parking study examined the availability of curb adjacent street parking along the Project frontage on E Street, D Street, Lemon Avenue, and the north and south bound lanes of Euclid Avenue. The parking study concluded that the minimum parking availability during the peak demand for parking was 48 spaces. In other words, if the Project was at a 100 563
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 6 of 29 ends

percent tenant occupancy during peak demand , there would be 10 additional street parking spaces available for public use. Thus, t he number of off -street parking spaces available meets the minimum parking requirement for the Project as supported by the parking study.

(d) A rchitecture — The building will be designed in a contemporary Art Deco architectural styl e, as depicted in Exhibit E: Exterior Elevations and Exhibit F: Project Renderings, attached. Ground floor commercial units are designed as a traditional storefront with a bulkhead (base), display windows, transom windows above display windows and entry door, and a mid-panel floor to distinguish from the upper residential floors. A combination of brick veneer, in a variety of colors and textures, smooth stucco, and fiber cement siding will emphasize each building modulation that will be carried through to the upper residential floors. The residential units will feature balconies with solid pony walls that consist of clear glass, stucco finish and an Art Deco motif. Vertical panels with windows that are inset from the exterior wall face and metal awnings are strategically placed over fourth-story windows to provide visual relief. The building has a parapet roof with decorative cornice.

 Articulation in building dipartite and tripartite divisions, creating breaks in horizontal massing every 30 to 65 feet through change of material and architectural features, and creating breaks in the vertical massing through use of a mid-floor panel distinguishing the commercial floor from the upper residential floors; and

 Articulation in storefront modulation through color and material changes, bulkhead/base, display windows, transom windows, glass entry doors with kickplates, and mid-floor panels; and

 Articulation in the building parapet and roof lines, which serves to accentuate the building’s entries and openings, and breaks up large expanses of building wall; and

 Articulation of building corners, through use of traditional Art Deco fluted columns and a stepped parapet roof; and

 Recessed and symmetrically arranged upper floor windows; and

 A mix of exterior materials, finishes, fixtures, and color blocking.

(e) Co
mmon Open Space, Amenities and Landscaping — Approximately 20,647 square feet of common open space and recreation amenities are provided throughout the site, which includes a pool deck and in -ground spa with seating, 2 outdoor lounge 564
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 7 of 29 ends

areas, open play area, indoor fitness room and work space on the ground floor and a roof deck and adjacent clubhouse with pool tables, tables, chairs, and sofas located on the fourth- level. Additional on -site amenities for residential tenants include long term bicycle parking and storage area. Common open space and amenities meet the minimum requirement of 20,500 square feet, at a ratio of 188 square feet per dwelling unit.

Landscaping is provided for the full length of the Project street frontages, recreation area, pedestrian walkways, and in the parking lot, for a total of 12,774 square feet (12.3 percent landscape coverage), which meets the minimum 12 percent landscape coverage requirement for the Project. A variety of accent and shade trees in 24-inch, 36-inch, and 48-inch box and 15-gallon sizes have been provided, as well as, 1, 5, and 15 - gallon size shrubs, groundcover, and vines. Decorative paving and lighting will be provided at entries, pedestrian walkways, and other key locations throughout the Project, as depicted in Exhibit G: Landscape Conceptual Plan, attached.

(f) S
ignage — All Project signage is required to comply with sign regulations provided in Ontario Development Code Division 8.1. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for the installation of any new on-site signage, the Applicant is required to submit Sign Plans for Planning Department review and approval.

(g) U
tilities (drainage, sewer) — Public utilities (water and sewer) are available to serve the Project. Furthermore, the Applicant has submitted a Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan ("PWQMP"), which establishes the Project's compliance with storm water discharge/water quality requirements. The PWQMP includes site design measures that capture runoff and pollutant transport by minimizing impervious surfaces and maximizes low impact development ("LID") best management practices ("BMPs"), such as retention and infiltration, biotreatment, and evapotranspiration. The PWQMP proposes the use of underground infiltration chambers located along the eastern portion of the site. Any overflow drainage will be conveyed to the public street by way of parkway drains and culverts.

T
he Project proposes to improve the existing right-of-way with 4-foot wide sidewalks with historic concrete scoring, King standard light post, and street trees, including Australian Willow, Chinquapin and Holly Oaks, and London Plane, planted in 4-foot wide tree grates designed to match the Civic Center/Town Square area.

(5) Ce rtificate of Appropriateness (File No. PHP22 -010) — Section 6.01.035 (Overlay Zoning Districts) of the Ontario Development Code, requires Certificate of Appropriateness approval for Development Plan a pproval located within the Euclid Avenue Overlay zoning district. The Euclid Avenue Overlay z oning district is intended to recognize, protect, and enhance the visual character and quality of Euclid Avenue as a historic resource (cultural landscape) and safeguard Euclid Avenue’s position on the National Register of Historic Places. The intent of the overlay zoning district is not to create a false sense of history with any new development along the Euclid Avenue Corridor, but 565
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 8 of 29 ends

rather to ensure that new development does not cause an adverse effect on the character-defining features of Euclid Avenue, such as the 60 -foot wide landscaped median, rock curbs, and King’s Standard lampposts. Additionally, all new construction should be compatible with the surrounding developments in site design, massing, and scale.

The Secretary of the Interior Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, also referred to as “the Standards,” provide a critical part of the framework of the national preservation program and are widely used at the federal, state and local levels to guide work on historic resources and have been adopted and incorporated into the Ontario Development Code. The Standards state that alterations will not destroy historic features and spatial relationships that characterize the historic resource and that new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with historic materials, features, size, scale, and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the resource.

The Downtown Design Guidelines, adopted in 1998, recognizes that downtown developed over several decades beginning in the late 1880s through the 1950s. As such, three retail districts were established to reflect the existing development and provide guidance on new context (infill) buildings. The Retail District is bound by Emporia Street to the south, G Street to the north, Lemon Avenue to the east, and generally Laurel Avenue to the west. The Retail District is further divided by thematical subdistricts. The “Turn-of-the-Century” starts at Emporia Street and then transitions north to the “Historic 1920s-1940s” at B Street. The subdistrict transitions north mid -block between C and D Streets to the “Historic 1950s Style,” where the Project site is located . Across from the Project site is the Ontario Laundry Building, Local Historic Landmark No. 6, built 1941 and constructed in the Streamline Moderne architectural style, and the remainder of the buildings on the block are single-story with large display windows typical of 1950s period construction. North of the Project site is a fueling station, office buildings, parking lots, and Bethel Congregational Church, Local Historic Landmark No. 24, constructed with split stone cladding in 1914. The commercial properties within this subdistrict have been constructed in a variety of styles, materials, and massing.

The Project illustrates the type of high -quality mixed-use development and architecture promoted by the proposed D Block PUD , Downtown Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of Interior Standards for the Treatment of Hist oric Properties. The design, site configuration and landscaping of the 4- story mixed -use commercial and residential development is appropriate in scale and massing for the infill construction and will not detract or adversely affect the historic character of neither Euclid Avenue n or the proposed Downtown Historic District.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION: T
he subject Application was advertised as a public hearing in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the City of Ontario (the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper). In addition, notices were mailed to all owners of real property located within a minimum of 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property that is the subject of the hearing, as shown on the records of the County Assessor. 566
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 9 of 29 ends

CORRESPONDENCE: As of the preparation of this Resolution, Planning Department staff has not received any written or verbal communications from the owners or occupants of properties surrounding the Project site or from the public in general, regarding the subject application.

AGENCY/DEPARTMENT REVIEWS: Each City agency/department has been provided the opportunity to review and comment on the subject application and recommend conditions of approval to be imposed upon the application. At the time of the Resolution preparation, recommended conditions of approval were provided and are appended to the attached Resolutions as "Attachment A."

On April 19, 2011, the City Council of the City of Ontario approved and adopted the ONT ALUCP, establishing the Airport Influence Area for Ontario International Airport, which encompasses lands within parts of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties, and limits future land uses and development within the Airport Influence Area, as they relate to noise, safety, airspace protection, and overflight impacts of current and future airport activity. As the decision-making body for File Nos. PMTT22 -019, PDEV22-031, and PHP22-010 and recommending body for File No. PUD22 -005, the Planning /Historic Preservation Commission has reviewed and considered the facts and information contained in the Application and supporting documentation against the ONT ALUCP compatibility factors, including [1] Safety Criteria (ONT ALUCP Table 2-2) and Safety Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-2), [2] Noise Criteria (ONT ALUCP Table 2-3) and Noise Impact Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2 -3), [3] Airspace protection Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2 -4), and [4] Overflight Notification Zo nes (ONT ALUCP Map 2 -5). As a result, the Planning / Historic Preservation Commission, therefore, finds and determines that the Project , when implemented in conjunction with the conditions of approval, will be consistent with the policies and criteria set forth within the ONT ALUCP.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE ONTARIO PLAN: The proposed Project is consistent with the principles, goals and policies contained within the Vision, Governance, Policy Plan (general plan), and City Council Priorities components of The Ontario Plan ("TOP"). More specifically, the goals and policies of TOP that are furthered by the proposed Project are as follows:

(1) C
ity Council Goals .

 Invest in the Growth and Evolution of the City's Economy  Operate in a Businesslike Manner
 Focus Resources in Ontario's Commercial and Residential Neighborhoods 567
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 10 of 29 ends

(2) Vision.

Distinctive Development:

 Commercial and Residential Development

 Development quality that is broadly recognized as distinctive and not exclusively tied to the general suburban character typical of much of Southern California.

(3) G overnance.

Decision Making:

 Go al G1 : Sustained decision-making that consistently moves Ontario towards its Vision by using The Ontario Plan as a framework for assessing choices.

 G 1 -2 . Long-term Benefit . We require decisions to demonstrate and document how they add value to the community and support the Ontario Vision.

(4) Po licy Plan (General Plan)

Land Use Element:

 G oal LU -1 Balance: A community that has a spectrum of housing types and price ranges that match the jobs in the City and that make it possible for peopl e to live and work in Ontario and maintain a quality of life.

 L U -1.1 Strategic Growth. We concentrate growth in strategic locations that help create place and identity, maximize available and planned infrastructure, foster the development of transit, and support the expansion of the active and multimodal transportation networks throughout the City.

 L U -1.6 Complete Community. We incorporate a variety of land uses and building types in our land use planning efforts that result in a complete community where residents at all stages of life, employers, workers, and visitors have a wide spectrum of choices of where they can live, work, shop and recreate within Ontario.

 G
oal LU -2 Compatibility: Compatibility between a wide range of uses and a resultant urban patterns and forms.

 L U -2.6 Infrastructure Compatibility . We require infrastructure to be aesthetically pleasing and in context with the community character.

H
ousing Element:
568
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 11 of 29 ends

 Goal H-2 Housing Supply & Diversity : Diversity of types of quality hou sing that are affordable to a range of household income levels, accommodate changing demographics, and support and reinforce the economic sustainability of Ontario.

 H
- 2.5 Housing Design . We require architectural excellence through adherence to City design guidelines, thoughtful site planning, environmentally sustainable practices, and other best practices.

 G oal H -5 Special Needs: A full range of housing types and community services that meet the special housing needs for all individuals and families in Ontario, regardless of income level, age, or other status.

C
ommunity Economics Element:

 G oal CE -1 Complete Community: A complete community that provides for all incomes and stages of life.

 CE-1 .6 Diversity of Housing . We collaborate with residents, housing providers, and the development community to provide housing opportunities for every stage of life; we plan for a variety of housing types and price points to encourage the development of housing supportive of our efforts to attract business in growing sectors of the community while being respectful of existing viable uses.

 G oal CE -2 Placemaking: A City of distinctive neighborhoods, districts, corridors, and centers where people choose to be.

 CE-2. 1 Development Projects . We require new deve lopment and redevelopment to create unique, high-quality places that add value to the community.

 CE-2. 2 Development Review . We require those proposing new development and redevelopment to demonstrate how their projects will create appropriately unique, functional, and sustainable places that will compete well with their competition within the region.

 CE-2. 4 Protection of Investment . We require that new development and redevelopment protect existing investment by providing architecture and urban design of equal or greater quality.

 CE-2. 5 Private Maintenance. We require adequate maintenance, upkeep, and investment in private property because proper maintenance on private property protects property values.

S
afety Element:

569
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 12 of 29 ends

 Goal S -1 Seismic & Geologic Hazards : Minimized risk of injury, loss of life, property damage, and economic and social disruption caused by earthquake-induced and other geologic hazards.

 S - 1.1 Implementation of Regulations and Standards. We require that all new habitable structures be designed in accordance with the most recent California Building Code adopted by the City, including provisions regarding lateral forces and grading.

C
ommunity Design Element:

 G oal CD -1 Image & Identity : A dynamic, progressive city containing distin ct and complete places that foster a positive sense of identity and belonging among residents, visitors, and businesses.

 CD-1. 1 City Identity. We take actions that are consistent with the City being a leading urban center in Southern California while recognizing, enhancing, and preserving the character of our existing viable neighborhoods.

 CD-1 .2 Place Types. We establish Place Types in urban, mixed use, and transit-oriented areas to foster the City's identity as a premier community and require new development within each Place Type to incorporate prescribed urban patterns, forms, and placemaking priorities.

 CD-1. 3 Existing Neighborhoods. We require the existing character of viable residential and non-residential neighborhoods be preserved, protected, and enhanced.

 G oal CD -2 Design Quality : A high level of design quality resulting in neighborhoods, public spaces, parks, and streetscapes that are attractive, safe, functional, human-scale, and distinct.

 CD-2 .1 Quality Building Design and Architecture . We encourage all development projects to convey visual interest and character through:

• B
uilding volume, massing, and height to provide context -appropriate scale and proportion;
• A true architectural style which is carried out in plan, section, and elevation through all aspects of the building and site design and appropriate for its setting; and
• Exterior building materials that are articulated, high quality, durable, and appropriate for the architectural style.

 CD-2. 2 Neighborhood Design . We create distinct residential neighborhoods that promote a sense of community and identity by emphasizing access, connectivity, livability, and social interaction through such elements as:

570
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 13 of 29 ends

• A pattern of smaller, walkable blocks that promote activity, safety, and access to nearby amenities and services;
• Varied parcel sizes and lot configurations to accommodate a diversity of housing types;
• Traffic calming measures to slow traffic and promote walkability while maintaining acceptable traffic flows and emergency evacuation access; • Floor plans that encourage views onto the street and de-emphasize the visual and physical dominance of garages (introducing the front porch as the "outdoor living room"), as appropriate; and
• Landscaped parkways, with sidewalks separated from the curb and designed to maximize safety, comfort, and aesthetics for all users.

 CD-2. 7 Sustainability. We collaborate with the development community to design and build neighborhoods, streetscapes, sites, outdoor spaces, landscaping, and buildings to reduce energy demand through solar orientation, maximum use of natural daylight, passive solar and natural ventilation, building form, mecha nical and structural systems, building materials, and construction techniques.

 CD-2
.8 Safe Design . We incorporate defensible space design into new and existing developments to ensure the maximum safe travel and visibility on pathways, corridors, and open space and at building entrances and parking areas by avoiding physically and visually isolated spaces, maintaining visibility and accessibility, and using lighting.

 CD-2. 9 Landscape Design . We encourage durable, sustainable, and drought-tolerant landscaping materials and designs that enhance the aesthetics of structures, create and define public and private spaces, and provide shade and environmental benefits.

 CD-

2.10 Parking Areas. We require all development, including single-family residential, to minimize the visual impact of surface, structured, and garage parking areas visible from the public realm in an aesthetically pleasing, safe and environmentally sensitive manner. Examples include:

• Su
rface parking: Shade trees, pervious surfaces, urban run -off capture and infiltration, and pedestrian paths to guide users through the parking field.

 CD-2. 11 Entry Statements . We encourage the inclusion of amenities, signage, and landscaping at the entry to neighborhoods, commercial centers, mixed use areas, industrial developments, and public places that reinforce them as uniquely identifiable places.

 CD-2. 12 Site and Building Signage. We encourage the use of sign programs that utilize complementary materials, colors, and themes. Project signage should be 571
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 14 of 29 ends

designed to effectively communicate and direct users to various aspects of the development and complement the character of the structures.

 C D-2.13 Entitlement Process. We work collaboratively with all stakeholders to ensure a high degree of certainty in the efficient review and timely processing of all development plans and permits.

 G oal CD -3 Urban, Mixed Use, and Transit-Oriented Place Types: Vibrant urban environments that are organized around intense buildings, pedestrian and transit areas, public plazas, and linkages between and within developments that are conveniently located, visually appealing and safe during all hours.

 CD-3
.2 Comfortable, Human -Scale Public Realm . We require that public spaces, including streets, parks, and plazas on both public and private property be designed to maximize safety, comfort and aesthetics and connect to the citywide pedestrian, vehicular, and bicycle networks.

 CD-3
.3 Complete and Connected Network . We require that pedestrian, vehicular, and bicycle circulation on both public and private property be coordinated to provide connections internally and externally to adjacent neighborhoods and properties (existing and planned) through a system of local roads and trails that promote walking and biking to nearby destinations (including existing and planned parks, commercial areas, and transit stops) and are designed to maximize safety, comfort, and aesthetics.

 CD-3
.4 Context -Aware and Appropriate Design . We require appropriate building and site design that complements existing development, respects the intent and identity of the Place Type, and provides appropriate transitions and connections between adjacent uses to ensure compatibility of scale, maintain an appropriate level of privacy for each use, and minimize potential conflicts.

 CD-3.
5 Active Frontages . We create lively pedestrian streetscapes by requiring primary building, business, and r esidential entrances, outdoor dining, and storefronts be located on ground floors adjacent to sidewalks or public spaces and designed to maximize safety, comfort, aesthetics, and the intended functionality (as defined by the Place Type).

 CD-3 .6 Managed In frastructure. We collaborate with developers and property owners to facilitate development that realizes the envisioned character and functionality of the Place Type through the use of green and shared infrastructure within each Place Type.

 G oal CD -5 Protection of Investment : A sustained level of maintenance and improvement of properties, buildings, and infrastructure that protects the property values and encourages additional public and private investments. 572
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 15 of 29 ends

 CD-5.1 Maintenance of Buildings and Propert y. We require all public and privately-owned buildings and property (including trails and easements) to be properly and consistently maintained.

 CD-5. 2 Maintenance of Infrastructure . We require the continual maintenance of infrastructure.

H
OUSING ELEMENT COMPLIANCE: The Project is consistent with the Housing Element of the Policy Plan (general plan) component of The Ontario Plan, as the Project site is not one of the properties in the Housing Element Sites contained in Tables B- 1 and B-2 (Housing Element Sites Inventory) of the Housing Element Technical Report.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32, In- fill Development Pr ojects) of the CEQA Guidelines , and meets all of the following conditions:

(a) The proposed Project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The proposed Project is located within the Downtown Mixed Use land use designation of the Policy Plan (general plan) Land Use Map, and the MU - 1/LUA-1 (Downtown Mixed Use/Euclid Avenue Entertainment) zoning district. The proposed Project is consistent with all applicable Policy Plan policies, as well as with the requirements of the MU -1/LUA-1 (Downtown Mixed Use/Euclid Avenue Entertainment) zoning district and the related proposed D Block Planned Unit Development, which, at the Project location, intends to accommodate housing units at a density of 25 to 75 du/ac.

(b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The Project is proposed within the established boundaries of the City of Ontario, on a project site totaling 2.38 - acres of land, which is surrounded by established development on all sides and consists of a mix of multiple-family, civic, retail, and commercial land uses.

(c) The Project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. The site is located in an urbanized area that has been fully developed with a commercial building and a large paved surface for vehicular parking, and as such is not suitable habitat for any endangered, rare, or threatened species. Additionally, the site is not been identified on federal or state designation map.

(d) Approval of the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed mixed -use commercial and residential development is similar to, and of no greater impact than other allowed uses and development projects within the MU-1/LUA-1 (Downtown Mixed Use/Euclid Avenue Entertainment) zoning district . The Project would not result in any significant impacts 573
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 16 of 29 ends

through implementation of required state, regional, and local development and performance standards, and as demonstrated in the Air Quality and GHG, Noise, Traffic, and Parking Studies, and the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan ("PWQMP") prepared for the Project.

(e) The site is adequately served by all required utilities and public services. All necessary wet and dry utilities are within the public street and are readily available for connection; and

(f) The application of the categorical exemption is not barred by one of the exceptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

574
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 17 of 29 ends

TECHNICAL APPENDIX:

Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:

Existing Land Use Policy Plan
Land Use Designation
Zoning
Designation
Site:

Vacant retail, commercial, and
office center and paved parking
lots
Mixed Use Downtown MU-1 (Mixed Use Downtown/ D
Block PUD
North: Fuel station and paved parking lot Mixed Use Downtown MU-1 (Mixed Use Downtown) South: Parking structure and undeveloped
land Mixed Use Downtown Downtown Civic Center PUD
East: Retail and office Office Commercial OL (Low Intensity Office) West: Euclid Avenue corridor and
commercial Mixed Use Downtown MU-1(Mixed Use Downtown)

General Site & Building Statistics
Item Required Min./Max. Provided (Ranges) Meets
Y/N
Project area (in acres): None 2.38 Y
Maximum project density
(dwelling units/ac): 25.1- 75 DU/AC 45.8 Y
Floor Area Ratio(FAR): 2.0 Max. 0.03 Y
Maximum coverage (in %): None 29.3
Euclid Ave setback (in FT): 0-3 3 Y
D and E Streets setback (in FT): 3-10 6 Y
Lemon Ave setback (in FT): 2-15 2 Y
Drive aisle setback (in FT): 15 15 Y
Parking setback (in FT): 20-feet (to building) and 7-feet (to back of sidewalk)
20-feet (to building) and 7-feet
2-inches (to back of sidewalk) Y
Maximum dwelling
units/building: 60- 178 109 Y
Maximum height (in FT): 55 51 Y
Parking – resident: 1 per bedroom 162 Y
Parking – guest and retail: .20 per unit 22 guest and 16 retail (38 total) Y Open space – private (in SF): 60 60-90 average Y
Open space – common (in SF): 188 per unit 189 per unit average Y 575
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 18 of 29 ends

Exhibit A: PROJECT LOCATION MAP
Project
Site
576
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 19 of 29 ends

Exhibit B: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 20556
APN:
1048-363-01
Not A Part
577
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 20 of 29 ends

Exhibit C: SITE PLAN
578
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 21 of 29 ends

Exhibit D: FLOOR PLANS

First Level
579
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 22 of 29 ends

Exhibit D: FLOOR PLANS (CONTINUED)

2nd and 3rd Levels
580
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 23 of 29 ends

Exhibit D: FLOOR PLANS (CONTINUED)

4th Level
581
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 24 of 29 ends

Exhibit D: FLOOR PLANS (CONTINUED)

Residential Unit Plan Layout Typical
582
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 25 of 29 ends

Exhibit D: FLOOR PLANS (CONTINUED)

Amenities Plan Layout Typical
583
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 26 of 29 ends

Exhibit E: EXTERIOR ELEVAITONS

Euclid Avenue (west)

D Street (south)

Lemon Avenue (east)

E Street (north)

584
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 27 of 29 ends

Exhibit F: P ROJECT RENDERINGS

Northeast corner of Euclid Avenue and D Street

Pedestrian Pass-thru on Euclid Avenue

585
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 28 of 29 ends

Exhibit F: PROJECT RENDERINGS (CONTINUED)

Northeast Perspective (Euclid Avenue and D Street)

Southwest Perspective (Lemon Avenue and E Street)
586
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File Nos.: PUD22-005, PMTT22-019, PDEV22-031 and PHP22-010 April 25, 2023

Page 29 of 29 ends

Exhibit G: LANDSCAPE CONCEPTUAL PLAN
587
group, inc.
engineering

AIR QUALITY & GREENHOUSE GAS IMPACT STUDY
414 & 440 EUCLID AVENUE MIXED USE PROJECT
City of Ontario, California
Attachment B-1
588
RK17272.doc
JN:3004-2021-02
414 & 440 EUCLID AVENUE MIXED USE PROJECT

NOISE IMPACT STUDY
City of Ontario, California
Prepared for:

Mr. George Voight

ONTARIO PL

ACE D BLOCK, LLC
119 E St. Joseph Street
Arcadia, CA 91006
Prepared by:

RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
4000 Westerly Place, Suite 280
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Bryan Estrada, AICP
Darshan Shivaiah, CEP-IT
April 1, 2022
589

Table of Contents
Section Page

1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1-1

1.1 Site Location 1-1

1.2 Project Description 1-1

1.3 Sensitive Receptors 1-2

1.4 Summary of Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impacts 1-3

1.5 Recommended Projec t Design Features 1-4

2.0 Air Quality Setting .................................................................................... 2-1

2.1 Description of Air Pollutants 2-1

2.2 Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards 2-4

2.3 Attainment Status 2-6

2.4 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 2-7

2.4.1 SCAQMD Rules and Regulations 2-8

2.5 Local Climate and Meteorology 2-9

2.6 Local Air Quality 2-10

3.0 Global Climate Change Setting ............................................................... 3-1

3.1 Greenhouse Gases 3-2

3.2 GHG Regulatory Setting – State of California 3-4

3.3 GHG Emissions Inventory 3-4

4.0 Modeling Parameters and Assumptions ................................................. 4-1

4.1 Construction Assumptions 4-1

4.2 Localized Construction Analysis Modeling Parameters 4-2

4.3 Operational Assumptions 4-3

4.3.1 Mobile Source Emissions 4-3

4.3.2 Energy Source Emissions 4-5

4.3.3 Area Source Emissions 4-6

4.3.4 Other Sources of Operational Emissions 4-7

5.0 Significance Thresholds ............................................................................ 5-1

5.1 Air Quality Regional Significance Thresholds 5-1

5.2 Air Quality Localized Significance Thresholds 5-1

5.3 City of Ontario General Plan 5-2

5.4 City of Ontario Communi ty Climate Action Plan 5-3

6.0 Air Quality Impact Analysis ...................................................................... 6-1

6.1 Short-Term Air Quality Impacts - Construction 6-1

6.1.1 Daily Emissions - Construction 6-1

6.1.2 Localized Emissions - Construction 6-2

6.1.3 Fugitive Dust - Construction 6-3

590

Table of Contents (continued)
Section Page

6.1.4 Odors - Construction 6-4

6.1.5 Asbestos - Construction 6-4

6.1.6 Diesel Particulat e Matter - Construction 6-5

6.2 Long Terms Air Quality Impacts - Operation 6-7

6.2.1 Regional Emissions - Operation 6-7

6.2.2 Localized Emissions - Operation 6-8

6.2.3 Odors – Operation 6-8

6.2.4 Toxic Air Contaminants – Operation 6-9

7.0 Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis ............................................................ 7-1 591

List of Attachments

Exhibits

Location Map ........................................................................................................... A Site Plan ................................................................................................................... B

Tables

Land Use Summary ................................................................................................... 1 CEQA Air Quality Impact Criteria ............................................................................... 2 CEQA GHG Impact Criteria ........................................................................................ 3 Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) .......................................... 4 South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status ................................................................... 5 Meteorological Summary .......................................................................................... 6 Local Air Quality ....................................................................................................... 7 Global Warming Potential of Greenhouse Gases ........................................................ 8 GHG Emissions Inventory .......................................................................................... 9 Construction Equipment Assumptions ....................................................................... 10 Trip Generation Rates ............................................................................................... 11 Operational Vehicle Miles Traveled ............................................................................ 12 Operational Vehicle Mix ............................................................................................ 13 Electricity and Natural Gas Usage - Unmitigated ........................................................ 14 Operational Water Usage and Waste Generation ....................................................... 15 SCAQMD Regional Significance Air Quality Thresholds ............................................... 16 SCAQMD Localized Significance Air Quality Thresholds .............................................. 17 Regional Construction Emissions ............................................................................... 18 Localized Construction Emissions .............................................................................. 19 Regional Operational Emissions ................................................................................. 20 Localized Operational Emissions ................................................................................ 21

Appendices

Daily Emission Calculations Outputs (CalEEMod) ....................................................... A Annual Emission Calculations Outputs (CalEEMod) .................................................... B Ontario Community Climate Action Plan Screening Tables ......................................... C

592

1-1

1 . 0 I n t r o d u c t i o n

The purpose of this air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) impact study is to determine whether the estimated criteria air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions generated from the construction and operation of the prop osed 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project (hereinafter referred to as project) would cause significant impacts to air resources.

This assessment was conducted within the cont ext of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, California Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq.). The methodology follows the California Air Resources Boar d (CARB), the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and City of Ontario recommendations for quantification of emissions and evaluation of potential impacts.

1.1 Site Location

The project site is located on the northeast corn er of Euclid Avenue and East D Street, at 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue, in the City of Ontario.

The project site is located within the S outh Coast Air Basin (SCAB), the SCAQMD San Bernardino Valley General Foreca st Area, and the Southwest San Bernardino Valley Air Monitoring Area-33.

The project location map is provided in Exhibit A.

1.2 Project Description

The project proposes to construct and op erate 109 multifamily re sidential homes and 5,356 square feet of ground floor general co mmercial use on approximately 2.3 acres. The project site currently consists of approximately 44,572 square feet of existing buildings and approximately 52,250 square feet of existing parking lot that will be demolished as a part of the project.

The site plan used for this an alysis, provided by ADEPT is illustrated in Exhibit B. Table 1 summarizes the proposed project land uses.

593

1-2

Table 1
Land Use Summary
Project Land Use CalEEMod
Land Use Category Quantity Metric
Multifamily Residential (Mid-Rise) Condos/Townhomes 109 Dwelling Units Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) Shopping Center 5,356.0 Square Feet Parking Lot Parking Lot 162 Spaces

The project is not expected to require the import or export of earthwork materials; preliminary grading estimates show a balance d site. The project is expected to be operational in the year 2024.

1.3 Sensitive Receptors

Sensitive receptors are considered land uses or other types of population groups that are more sensitive to air pollution exposure. Sensitive population groups include children, the elderly, the acutely and chronically ill, and t hose with cardio-respiratory diseases. For CEQA purposes, the SCAQMD considers a sensitive re ceptor to be a location where a sensitive individual could remain for 24- hours or longer, such as resi dences, hospitals, and schools (etc), as described in the Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (SCAQMD 2008a, page 3-2).

The nearest sensitive land uses to the project site include the following:

• Existing residential dwelling unit located al ong E Street, approximately 90 feet from the project site.

594

1-3

1.4 Summary of Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impacts

Table 2 provides a summary of the CEQA air quality impact analysis results.

Table 2
CEQA Air Quality Impact Criteria
Air Quality Impact Criteria Potentially
Significant
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Conflict with, or obstruct implementation of, the
applicable air quality plan?
X
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase
of any criteria pollutant for which the project
region is in non-attainment under an applicable
Federal or State ambient air quality standard?
X
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations? X
e) Result in other emissions (such as those leading
to odors) adversely affecting a substantial
number of people?
X

Table 3 provides a summary of the CEQA GHG impact criteria analysis results.

Table 3
CEQA GHG Impact Criteria
GHG Impact Criteria Potentially
Significant
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
X
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
emissions of greenhouse gases?
X

595

1-4

1.5 Recommended Project Design Features

The following recommended project design features include standard dust control measures, construction best practices and building code requirements that are intended to reduce air quality and GHG emissions. Project design features should be included as part of the conditions of approval for the project but are not typica lly considered mitigation under CEQA.

Construction Design Features:

DF-1 The project must follow the standar d SCAQMD rules and re quirements with regards to fugitive dust control, whic h includes, but are not limited to the following:

1. All active construction areas shall be watered two (2) times daily.

2. Speed on unpaved roads shall be reduced to less than 15 mph.

3. Any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway shall be swept or washed at the site access points within 30 minutes.

4. Any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material shall be covered or watered twice daily.

5. All operations on any unpaved surface shall be suspended if winds exceed 15 mph.

6. Access points shall be washed or swept daily.

7. Construction sites shall be sandbagged for erosion control.

8. Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers’ specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or more).

9. Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials, and maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard space in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 23114.

10. Pave or gravel construction access roads at least 100 feet onto the site from the main road and use gravel aprons at truck exits.

11. Replace the ground cover of disturbed areas as quickly possible.

DF-2 All diesel construction equipment sh ould have Tier 4 low emission “clean diesel” engines (OEM or retrofit) that include diesel oxi dation catalysts and diesel particulate filters that meet th e latest CARB best available control technology.
596

1-5

DF-3 Construction equipment should be maintained in proper tune.

DF-4 All construction vehicles should be pr ohibited from excessive idling. Excessive idling is defined as five (5) minutes or longer.

DF-5 Minimize the simultaneous operati on of multiple construction equipment units, to the maximum extent feasible.

DF-6 The use of heavy construction equipm ent and earthmoving activity should be suspended during Air Alerts when the Air Quality Index reaches the “Unhealthy” level.

DF-7 Establish an electricity supply to the construction site and use electric powered equipment instead of diesel -powered equipment or generators, where feasible.

DF-8 Establish staging areas for the cons truction equipment that as far from adjacent residential homes, as feasible.

DF-9 Use haul trucks with on-road engines instead of off-road engines for on-site hauling.

Operational Design Features

DF-10 Implement the GHG Reduction Measur es from the Ontario County Climate Action Plan (CAP) Screening Tables to achieve at least 100 points, per the requirements for Mixed Use Projects.

DF-11 The project will comply with the man datory requirements of the California Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 6 (Energy Code) and Part 11 (CALGreen), including, but not limited to:

• Install low flow fixtures and toilets, water efficient irrigation systems, drought tolerant/native landscaping, and reduce the amount of turf.

• Provide the necessary infrastructu re to support electric vehicle charging.
597

1-6

DF-12 Participate in the local waste ma nagement recycling and composting programs.

DF-13 Encourage the property management company and landscape maintenance crews to use electric powered la ndscaping equipment for landscape maintenance.

598

2-1

2 . 0 A i r Q u a l i t y S e t t i n g

The Federal Clean Air Act (§ 7602) defines ai r pollution as any agent or combination of such agents, including any phys ical, chemical, biological, or radioactive substance which is emitted into or otherwise enters the ambien t air. Household combustion devices, motor vehicles, industrial facilities and forest fi res are common sources of air pollution. Air pollution can cause disease, allergies and ev en death. It affects soil, water, crops, vegetation, manmade materials, animals, wildli fe, weather, visibility, and climate. It can also cause damage to and deterioration of property, present hazards to transportation, and negatively impact the economy.

This section provides background informati on on criteria air pollutants, the applicable federal, state and local regulations concerning air pollution, and the existing physical setting of the project within the context of local air quality.

2.1 Description of Air Pollutants 1.

The following section describes the air pollutants of concern related to the project. Criteria air pollutants are defined as those pollutant s for which the federal and state governments have established air quality standards for out door or ambient concentrations to protect public health. The following descriptions of cr iteria air pollutants have been provided by the SCAQMD.

• Carbon Monoxide (CO) is a colorless, odorless, toxi c gas produced by incomplete combustion of carbon-contai ning fuels (e.g., gasoline, diesel fuel, and biomass).

Sources include motor vehicle exhaust, indu strial processes (metals processing and chemical manufacturing), residential wood burning, and natura l sources. CO is somewhat soluble in water; therefore, ra infall and fog can suppress CO conditions.

CO enters the body through the lungs, di ssolves in the blood, and competes with oxygen, often replacing it in the blood, thus reducing the blood's ability to transport oxygen to vital organs in the body. Th e ambient air quality standard for carbon monoxide is intended to protect persons whose medical condition already compromises their circulatory system's abi lity to deliver oxygen. These medical conditions include certain heart ailments, chronic lung diseases, and anemia. Persons with these conditions have reduced exercise capacity even when ex posed to relatively low levels of CO. Fetuses are at risk because their blood has an even greater affinity to bind with CO. Smokers are al so at risk from ambient CO levels because smoking

1 SCAQMD. Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning (May 6, 2005)
599

2-2

increases the background le vel of CO in their blood. The South Coast basin has recently achieved attainment status for carbon monoxide by both USEPA and CARB.

• Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2) is a byproduct of fuel comb ustion. The principal form of nitrogen oxide produced by combustion is ni tric oxide (NO), but NO reacts quickly to form NO2, creating the mixture of NO and NO 2 commonly called NOx. NO2 acts as an acute irritant and, in equal concentrations, is more injurious than NO. At atmospheric concentrations, however, NO2 is only potentially irritating . There is some indication of a relationship between NO 2 and chronic pulmonary fibr osis. Some increase in bronchitis in young children has also been observed at concentrations below 0.3 parts per million (ppm). NO 2 absorbs blue light which results in a brownish red cast to the atmosphere and reduced visibility. Although NO 2 concentrations have not exceeded national standards since 1991 and the state hourly standard since 1993, NO x emissions remain of concern because of their contribution to the formation of O3 and particulate matter.

• Ozone (O 3) is one of several substances called photochemical oxidants that are formed when volatile organic compounds (VOC) and NO x react in the presence of ultraviolet sunlight. O 3 concentrations in the South Coast basin are typically among the highest in the nation, and the damaging effects of photochemical smog, which is a popular name for a nu mber of oxidants in combination, are generally related to the concentrations of O 3. Individuals exercising outdoor s, children, and people with preexisting lung disease, such as asthma and chronic pulmonar y lung disease, are considered to be the subgroups most susceptible to O 3 effects. Short-term exposures (lasting for a few hours) to O 3 at levels typically observed in southern California can result in breathing pattern changes, re duction of breathing capacity, increased susceptibility to infections, inflammation of the lung tissue, and some immunological changes. In recent years, a corr elation between elevated ambient O 3 levels and increases in daily hospital admission rates, as well as mortality, has also been reported. The South Coast Air Basin is designated by th e USEPA as an extreme non- attainment area for ozone. Although O 3 concentrations have declined substantially since the early 1990s, the South Coast basin continues to have peak O 3 levels that exceed both state and federal standards.

• Fine Particulate Matter (PM 10) consists of extremely smal l, suspended particles or droplets 10 microns or smaller in diameter that can lodge in the lungs, contributing to respiratory problems. PM 10 arises from such sources as re-entrained road dust, diesel soot, combustion products, tire an d brake abrasion, construction operations, and fires. It is also formed in the atmosphere from NO x and SO 2 reactions with ammonia. PM10 scatters light and significantly redu ces visibility. Inhalable particulates 600

2-3

pose a serious health hazard, alone or in combination with other pollutants. More than half of the smallest particles inhaled will be deposited in the lungs and can cause permanent lung damage. Inhalable particulate s can also have a da maging effect on health by interfering with the body’s mech anism for clearing the respiratory tract or by acting as a carrier of an absorbed toxic substance. The South Coast basin has recently achieved federal attainment status for PM 10, but is non-attainment based on state requirements.

• Ultra-Fine Particulate Matter (PM 2.5) is defined as particulate matter with a diameter less than 2.5 microns and is a subset of PM 10. PM 2.5 consists mostly of products from the reaction of NO x and SO 2 with ammonia, secondary organics, finer dust particles, and the combustion of fuels, including diesel soot. PM 2.5 can cause exacerbation of symptoms in sensitive patie nts with respiratory or cardiovascular disease, declines in pulmonary function gr owth in children, an d increased risk of premature death from heart or lung diseases in the elderl y. Daily fluctuations in PM 2.5 levels have been related to hospital admissions for acute respiratory conditions, school absences, and increased medication use in children and adults with asthma. The South Coast basin is designated as non-attainment for PM

2.5 by both federal and state
standards.

• Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a colorless, pungent gas formed primarily by the combustion of sulfur-containing fossil fuels. Health effects include acute respiratory symptoms and difficulty in breathing for children. Individuals with asth ma may experience constriction of airways with exposure to SO 2. Though SO 2 concentrations have been reduced to levels well below state and fe deral standards, further reductions in SO 2 emissions are needed because SO2 is a precursor to sulfate and PM10. The South Coast basin is considered a SO2 attainment area by USEPA and CARB.

• Lead (Pb) is a toxic heavy metal that can be emitted into the air through some industrial processes, burning of leaded gasoline and past use of lead-based consumer products. Lead is a neurotoxin that accumu lates in soft tissues and bones, damages the nervous system, and causes blood disord ers. It is particularly problematic in children, in that permanent brain damage may result, even if blood levels are promptly normalized with tr eatment. Concentrations of lead once exceeded the state and federal air quality standar ds by a wide margin, but a s a result of the removal of lead from motor vehicle gasoline, ambient air quality standards for lead have not been exceeded since 1982 . Though special monitoring sites immediately downwind of lead sources recorded localized violat ions of the state standard in 1994, no violations have been recorded since. Consequently, the South Coast basin is designated as an attainment area for lead by both the USEPA an d CARB. This report 601

2-4

does not analyze lead emissions from the project, as it is not expected to emit lead in any significant measurable quantity.

• Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), although not actually a criteria air pollutant, VOCs are regulated by the SCAQMD becaus e they cause chemical reactions which contribute to the formation of ozone. VOCs are also transformed into organic aerosols in the atmosphere, contributing to higher PM 10 and lower visibility levels.

Sources of VOCs include combustion engine s, and evaporative emissions associated with fuel, paints and solvents, asphalt pav ing, and the use of household consumer products such as aerosols. Although he alth-based standards have not been established for VOCs, health effects can occu r from exposures to high concentrations of VOC. Some hydrocarbon components classified as VOC emissions are hazardous air pollutants. Benzene, for example, is a hy drocarbon component of VOC emissions that are known to be a human carcinogen. The term reactive organic gases (ROG) are often used interchangeably with VOC.

• Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) are defined as air pollutants which may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or serious illness, or which may pose a hazard to human health, and for which there is no c oncentration that does not present some risk. This contrasts with the criteria pollut ants, in that there is no threshold level for TAC exposure below which adverse health impacts are not expected to occur. The majority of the estimated health risk from TACs can be attributed to a relatively few compounds, the most common being diesel particulate matter (DPM) from diesel engine exhaust. In addition to DPM, benz ene and 1,3-butadiene are also significant contributors to overall ambient public health risk in California.

2.2 Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards

The Federal Clean Air Act, which was last amended in 1990, requires the EPA to set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for criteria pollutants considered harmful to public health and the environment. The State of California has also established additional and more stringent California Ambient Air Qua lity Standards (CAAQS) in addition to the seven criteria pollutants designated by the federal government.

AAQS are designed to protect the health an d welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The standar ds are divided into two cate gories, primary standards, and secondary standards. Primary standards are implemented to provide protection for the “sensitive” populations such as those with asthma, or the ch ildren and elderly. Secondary standards are to provide protection against vi sible pollution as well as damage to the surrounding environment, including animals, crops, and buildings. 602

2-5

Table 4 shows the Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards.

Table 4
Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS)1 Air Pollutant Averaging Time 2 Federal Standard
(NAAQS)2
California Standard
(CAAQS)2
Ozone
1 Hour -- 0.09 ppm
8 Hour 0.070 ppm 0.070 ppm
Carbon Monoxide
(CO)
1 Hour 35 ppm 20 ppm
8 Hour 9 ppm 9 ppm
Nitrogen Dioxide
(NO2)
1 Hour 0.100 ppm 0.18 ppm
Annual 0.053 ppm 0.030 ppm
Sulfur Dioxide
(SO2)
1 Hour 0.075 ppm 0.25 ppm
3 Hour 0.5 ppm3 --
24 Hour -- 0.04 ppm
Particulate Matter
(PM
10)
24 Hour 150 μg/m³ 50 μg/m³
Mean -- 20 μg/m³
Particulate Matter
(PM2.5)
24 Hour 35 μg/m³ --
Annual 12 μg/m³ 12 μg/m³
Lead
30-day -- 1.5 μg/m
Quarter 1.5 μg/m --
3-month average 0.15 μg/m --
Visibility reducing
particles 8 Hour -- 0.23/km extinction coefficient.
(10-mile visibility standard)
Sulfates 24 Hour -- 25 μg/m
Vinyl chloride 24 Hour -- 0.01 ppm
Hydrogen sulfide 24 Hour -- 0.03 ppm
1 Source: USEPA: https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/naaqs-table and CARB: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/california-ambient-air-quality-standards 2 ppm = parts per million of air, by volume; μg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; Annual = Annual Arithmetic Mean; 30-day = 30-day average; Quarter = Calendar quarter. 3 Secondary standards

603

2-6

Several pollutants listed in Table 4 are not addressed in this an alysis. Lead is not included because the project is not anticipated to emit lead. Visibility-reduc ing particles are not explicitly addressed in this analysis because pa rticulate matter is addressed. The project is not expected to generate or be exposed to vi nyl chloride because proposed project uses do not utilize the chemical processes that create this pollutant an d there are no such uses in the project vicinity. The proposed project is not expected to cause exposure to hydrogen sulfide because it would not generate hydrogen sulfide in any substantial quantity.

2.3 Attainment Status

The Clean Air Act requires states to prepare a State Implementation Plan (SIP) to ensure air quality meets the NAAQS. The California Air Re sources Board (CARB) provides designations of attainment for air basins where AAQS are either met or exceeded. If the AAQS are met, the area is designated as being in “attainment ”, if the air pollutant concentrations exceed the AAQS, than the area is designated as being “nonattainmen t”. If there is inadequate or inconclusive data to make a de finitive attainment designation, the area is considered “unclassified.”

National nonattainment areas are further desi gnated as marginal, moderate, serious, severe, or extreme as a function of deviation from standards. Each standard has a different definition, or ‘form’ of what constitutes attainment, based on specific air quality statistics.

For example, the Federal 8-hour CO standard is not to be exceeded more than once per year; therefore, an area is in attainment of the CO standard if no more than one 8-hour ambient air monitoring values exceeds the th reshold per year. In contrast, the federal annual PM 2.5 standard is met if the three-year average of the annual average PM 2.5 concentration is less than or equal to the standard.

When a state submits a request to the EPA to re-designate a nonattainment area to attainment, the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 175A(a) requires that the state (or states, if the area is a multi-state area) submit a maintena nce plan ensuring the area can maintain the air quality standard for which the area is to be re-designated for at least 10 years following the effective date of re-designation.

Table 5 lists the attainment status for the cr iteria pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB).

604

2-7

Table 5
South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status1
Pollutant State Status National Status
Ozone Nonattainment Nonattainment (Extreme)2
Carbon monoxide Attainment
Attainment
(Maintenance)
Nitrogen dioxide Attainment
Attainment
(Maintenance)
PM10 Nonattainment
Attainment
(Maintenance)
PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment
Lead Attainment Nonattainment (Partial)3
1 Source: California Air Resources Board. http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm 2 8-Hour Ozone.
3 Partial Nonattainment designation – Los Angeles County portion of Basin only.

2.4 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)

The agency responsible for air pollution control for the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) is the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD is responsible for controlling emissions primarily from stationa ry sources. SCAQMD maintains air quality monitoring stations throughout the SCAB. SCAQMD, in coor dination with the Southern California Association of Governments, is also responsible for developing, updating, and implementing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the SCAB. An AQMP is a plan prepared and implemented by an air pollution district for a co unty or region designated as nonattainment of the federal and/or Californi a ambient air quality standards. The term nonattainment area is used to refer to an ai r SCAB where one or more ambient air quality standards are exceeded.

The latest version is the 2016 AQMP. The 2016 AQ MP is a regional blueprint for achieving the federal air quality standards and healthfu l air. While air quality has dramatically improved over the years, the SCAB still exceed s federal public health standards for both ozone and particulate matter (PM) and experien ces some of the worst air pollution in the nation. The 2016 AQMP includes both stationary and mobile source st rategies to ensure that rapidly approaching attainment deadlines ar e met, that public health is protected to the maximum extent feasible, an d that the region is not face d with burdensome sanctions if the Plan is not approved or if the NAAQS are not met on time.

According to the 2016 AQMP, the most signific ant air quality challenge in the SCAB is to reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions sufficie ntly to meet the upco ming ozone standard deadlines. Based on the inventory and modeling results, 522 tons per day (tpd) of total 605

2-8

SCAB NOx 2012 emissions are projected to dr op to 255 tpd and 214 tpd in the 8-hour ozone attainment years of 2023 and 2031 respectively, due to continued implementation of already adopted regulatory actions (“baseline emissions”) . The analysis suggests that total SCAB emissions of NOx must be reduce d to approximately 141 tpd in 2023 and 96 tpd in 2031 to attain the 8-hour ozone standa rds. This represents an additional 45 percent reduction in NOx in 2023, and an additi onal 55 percent NOx reduction beyond 2031 levels.2

2.4.1 SCAQMD Rules and Regulations

The SCAQMD establishes a program of rules and regulations to obtain attainment of the state and federal standards in conjunction with the AQMP. Several of the rules and regulations that may be applicab le to this project include, but are not limited to, the following:

• SCAQMD Rule 402 prohibits a person from di scharging from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.

• SCAQMD Rule 403 governs emissions of fugitive dust during construction and operation activities. Compliance with this rule is achieved through application of standard Best Management Practices, such as application of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils, covering ha ul vehicles, restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour, sweepi ng loose dirt from paved site access roadways, cessation of construction acti vity when winds exceed 25 mph, and establishing a permanent ground cover on finished sites.

• SCAQMD Rule 445 restricts wood burning devices from being installed into any new development and is intend ed to reduce the emission s of particulate matter for wood burning devices.

• SCAQMD Rule 1113 governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of architectural coating and limits the VOC content in paint s and paint solvents. This rule regulates the VOC content of paints available during construction. Therefore, all paints and

2 SCAQMD. Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/clean-air- plans/air-quality-mgt-plan/final-2016-aqmp
606

2-9

solvents used during construction and oper ation of project must comply with Rule 1113.

• SCAQMD Rule 1143 governs the manufacture, sale, and use of paint thinners and solvents used in thinning of coating materials, cleaning of coating application equipment, and other solvent cleaning oper ations by limiting their VOC content.

This rule regulates the VOC c ontent of solvents used duri ng construction. Solvents used during the construction phase must comply with this rule.

• SCAQMD Rule 1186 limits the presence of fugiti ve dust on paved and unpaved roads and sets certification protocols and requirements for street sweepers that are under contract to provide sweeping services to any federal, state, county, agency or special district such as water, air, sanitation, transit, or school district.

2.5 Local Climate and Meteorology

The project is located in the South Coast Air Basin (SCA B). Climatological data from the nearest weather station to the project site is summarized in Table 6.

Table 6
Meteorological Summary1
Month
Temperature (˚F) Mean Precipitation
(inches) Max. Min. Mean
January 66.8 44.0 55.5 3.65
February 69.4 45.0 57.2 2.85
March 70.1 46.3 58.2 2.80
April 74.5 48.4 61.5 1.13
May 79.9 52.6 66.2 0.26
June 86.7 56.6 71.7 0.04
July 95.0 62.2 78.6 0.01
August 94.4 62.9 78.7 0.11
September 91.3 61.3 76.3 0.34
October 83.0 55.4 69.2 0.34
November 73.6 48.5 61.0 1.72
December 68.3 44.4 56.3 2.07
Annual 79.4 52.3 65.9 15.32
1 Source: Western Regional Climate Center 2012. Averages derived from measurements recorded from 1951 to 1984 at Fontana Kaiser Station No. 043120.
607

2-10

2.6 Local Air Quality

The air quality at any site is dependent on the regional air qualit y and local pollutant sources. Regional air quality is determined by the release of pollutants throughout the air basin. Estimates of the existing emissions in the Basin provided in the Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan, prepared by SCAQ MD, March 2017, indicate that collectively, mobile sources account for 60 percent of th e VOC, 90 percent of the NOx emissions, 95 percent of the CO emissions and 34 percent of directly em itted PM2.5, with another 13 percent of PM2.5 from road dust.

The SCAQMD has divided the SCAB into fourteen general forecasting areas and thirty eight Source Receptor Areas (SRA) for monitoring and reporting local air quality. The SCAQMD provides daily reports of the current air quality conditions in each general forecast area and SRA. The monitoring areas provide a general representation of the local meteorological, terrain, and air quality conditions within the SCAB.

The project is located within the San Bern ardino Valley general forecasting area and Southwest San Bernardino Valley (SRA-33). The Southwest San Bernardino Valley has been divided into two (2) regions; I-10 Near Ro ad and CA-60 Near Road. Due to the close proximity of the project site to the I-10 Road, published ai r quality monitoring data has been used from this location.

Table 7 summarizes the published air quality m onitoring for the most recent 3-year period available. These pollutant levels were used to comprise a “backgro und” for the project location and existing local air quality. For cr iteria pollutants not monitored near the site, data from the nearest monitoring station with a comparable setting were used.

608

2-11

Table 7
Local Air Quality
Air Pollutant
Location
Averaging
Time Item 2018 2019 2020
Carbon
Monoxide
--
I-10 Near Road
1 Hour
Max 1-Hour (ppm) 1.6 1.5 1.5
Exceeded State Standard (20 ppm) No No No
Exceeded National Standard (35 ppm) No No No
8 Hour
Max 8 Hour (ppm) 1.3 1.1 1.2
Exceeded State Standard (9 ppm) No No No
Exceeded National Standard (9 ppm) No No No
Ozone
--
Central San
Bernardino Valley-1
1 Hour
Max 1-Hour (ppm) 0.141 0.124 0.151
Days > State Standard (0.09 ppm) 38 41 56.0
8 Hour
Max 8 Hour (ppm) 0.116 0.114 0.111
Days > State Standard (0.07 ppm) 69 67 89
Days >National Standard (0.070 ppm) 69 67 89
Nitrogen Dioxide
--
I-10 Near Road
1 Hour
Max 1-Hour (ppm) 0.0883 0.0863 0.094
Exceeded State Standard (0.18 ppm) No No No
Annual
Annual Average (ppm) 0.0272 0.0276 0.029
Exceeded >State Standard (0.030 ppm) No No No
Exceeded >National Standard (0.053 ppm) No No No
Sulfur Dioxide
--
Central San
Bernardino Valley-1
1 Hour
Max 1 Hour (ppm) 0.0029 0.0024 0.0025
Exceed State Standard (0.25 ppm) No No No
Exceed National Standard (0.075 ppm) No No No
Coarse Particles
(PM10)
--
Central San
Bernardino Valley-1
24 Hour
Max 24-Hour (μg/m³) 64 88 61
Days > State Standard (50 μg/m³) 9 12 6
Days >National Standard (150 μg/m³) 0 0 0
Annual
Annual Average (μg/m³) 34.1 34.8 35.80
Exceeded State Standard (20 μg/m³) Yes Yes Yes
Fine Particulates
(PM2.5)
--
Central San
Bernardino Valley-1
24 Hour
Max 24-Hour (μg/m³) 29.2 46.5 46.10
Days >National Standard (35 μg/m³) 0 2 1
Annual
Annual Average (μg/m³) 11.13 10.84 11.95
Exceeded State Standard (12 μg/m³) No No No
Exceeded National Standard (15 μg/m³) No No No
Source : https://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/historical-air-quality-data/historical-data-by-year μg/m³ = micrograms per cubic meter
ARB = California Air Resource Board
EPA= Environmental Protection Agency
ppm = part per million
(- -) = Data not provided
609

3-1

3.0 Global Climate Change Setting

Global climate change is the ch ange in the average weather of the earth that is measured by such things as alterations in temperatur e, wind patterns, storms, and precipitation.

Current data shows that the recent period of warming is occurring more rapidly than past geological events. The average global surfac e temperature has increa sed by approximately

1.4° Fahrenheit since the early 20 th Century. 1.4° Fahrenheit may seem like a small change, but it's an unusual event in Earth's recent history, and as we are seeing, even small changes in temperature can cause enormous changes in the environment.

The planet’s climate record, preserved in tree rings, ice cores, and co ral reefs, shows that the global average temperature has been stable over long periods of time. For example, at the end of the last ice age, when the Northeast United Stat es was covered by more than 3,000 feet of ice, average global temperatures were only 5° to 9° Fahrenheit cooler than today. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which includes more than 1,300 scientists from the United States and othe r countries, forecasts a temperature rise of

2.5° to 10° Fahrenheit over the next centur y. Therefore, significant changes to the environment are expected in the near future.

The consequences of global climate change include more frequent and severe weather, worsening air pollution by increasing ground le vel ozone, higher rates of plant and animal extinction, more acidic and oxygen depleted oceans, strain on food and water resources, and threats to densely populated coastal and low lying areas from sea level rise.

The impacts of climate change are already vi sible in the Southwest United States. In California, the consequences of climate change include;

• A rise in sea levels resulting in the displacement of coastal businesses and residencies
• A reduction in the quality and supply of water from the Sierra snowpack • Increased risk of large wildfires
• Exacerbation of air quality problems
• Reductions in the quality and quantity of agricultural products • An increased temperature and extreme weather events
• A decrease in the health and productivity of California’s forests

610

3-2

3.1 Greenhouse Gases

GHGs comprise less than 0.1 percent of the to tal atmospheric composition, yet they play an essential role in influencing climate. Greenhouse gases include naturally occurring compounds such as carbon dioxide (CO 2), methane (CH 4), water vapor (H 2O), and nitrous oxide (N2O), while others are synthe tic. Man-made GHGs includ e the chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and Perf luorocarbons (PFCs), as well as sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6). Different GHGs have different ef fects on the Earth's warming. GHGs differ from each other in their ability to absorb energy (their "radiative efficiency") and how long they stay in the atmosphere, also known as the "lifetime".

The Global Warming Potential (GWP) was develo ped to allow comparisons of the global warming impacts of different gases. Specifical ly, it is a measure of how much energy the emissions of 1 ton of a gas will absorb over a given period of time, relative to the emissions of 1 ton of CO2. The larger the GWP, the more that a given gas warms the Earth compared to CO2 over that time period. The time period usually used for GWPs is 100 years. GWPs provide a common unit of measure, which allows analysts to add up emissions estimates of different gases and allows policymakers to compare emissions redu ction opportunities across sectors and gases.

Table 8 lists the 100-year GWP of GHGs from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) sixth assessment report (AR6).

611

3-3

Table 8
Global Warming Potential of Greenhouse Gases1, 2
Gas Name Formula Lifetime (years) GWP
Carbon Dioxide CO2 1
Methane
CH4 (Fossil Origin)
12 29.8
CH4 (Non-Fossil Origin) 27.2
Nitrous Oxide N2O 114 273
Sulphur Hexafluoride SF6 3200 23,500
Nitrogen Trifluoride NF3 740 16,100
Chlorofluorocarbon (CFC-11) CFC-11 52 8,321
Hexafluoroethane (PFC-116) C2F6 10,000 11,100
Octafluoropropane (PFC-218) C3F8 2,600 8,900
Octafluorocyclobutane (PFC-318) C4F8 3,200 9,540
Tetrafluoromethane (PFC-14) CF4 50,000 5,301
Hydrofluorocarbon 125 HFC-125 29 3,170
Hydrofluorocarbon 134a HFC-134a 14 1,526
Hydrofluorocarbon 143a HFC-143a 52 4,800
Hydrofluorocarbon 152a HFC-152a 1 138
Hydrofluorocarbon 227ea HFC-227ea 34 3,350
Hydrofluorocarbon 23 HFC-23 270 12,400
Hydrofluorocarbon 236fa HFC-236fa 240 8,060
Hydrofluorocarbon 245fa HFC-245fa 8 858
Hydrofluorocarbon 32 HFC-32 5 771
Hydrofluorocarbon 365mfc HFC-365mfc 9 804
Hydrofluorocarbon 43-10mee HFC-43-10mee 16 1,650
1 Source: IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6),
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Full_Report.pdf https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WG1AR5_Chapter08_FINAL.pdf 2 GWPs are used to convert GHG emission values to "carbon dioxide equivalent" (CO2e) units

612

3-4

3.2 GHG Regulatory Setting – State of California

The State of California has been a leader in climate change legislation and has passed numerous bills to reduce greenhouse gas emissions across all sectors of the economy.

Some of the key climate legislation in the State include the following:

• Assembly Bill (AB) 32, California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. AB 32 set the stage for the State’s transition to a sustainable, low-carbon future. AB 32 was the first program in the country to take a comprehensive, long-term approach to addressing climate change.
3 • Senate Bill (SB) 375, Sustainable Co mmunities & Climate Protection Act of 2008. SB 375 requires the Air Resources Bo ard to develop regional greenhouse gas emission reduction targets fo r passenger vehicles GHG reduction target s for 2020 and 2035 for each region covered by th e State's 18 metrop olitan planning organizations.4

• Senate Bill (SB) 100, California Rene wables Portfolio Standard Program. SB 100 established a landmark policy requir ing renewable energy and zero-carbon resources supply 100 percent of electric retail sales to end-use customers by 2045.5

3 California Air Resources Board. AB 32 Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/fact-sheets/ab-32-global-warming-solutions-act-2006 4 California Air Resources Board. Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Program. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/sustainable-communities-climate-protection-program/about 5 California Energy Commission. SB 100 Joint Agency Report. https://www.energy.ca.gov/sb100 613

3-5

3.3 GHG Emissions Inventory

Table 9 shows the latest GHG emission inventories at the national, state, regional and local levels.

Table 9
GHG Emissions Inventory1
United States
(2019)2
State of California
(2019)3
SCAG
(2020)4
City of Ontario
(2020)5
6,558 MMTCO2e 418.2 MMTCO 2e 216.4 MMTCO 2e 3.12 MMTCO 2e 1 MMTCO2e = Million Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent 2 https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks 3 https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/pubs/reports/2000_2019/ghg_inventory_trends_00-19.pdf. 4 http://www.scag.ca.gov/programs/Pages/GreenhouseGases.aspx. Projected Emission from SACG - Regional GHG Inventory and Reference Case Projections, 1990-2035, dated May 30, 2012. 5 City of Ontario Community Climate Action Plan, November 2014. Estimated value. 614

4-1

4.0 Modeling Parameters and Assumptions

The California Emissions Estimator Model Version 2020.4.0 (CalEEMod) was used to calculate criteria air pollutants and GHG emissions from the construc tion and operation of the project. CalEEMod is a statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for governme nt agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify criteria air pollutant and GHG emissions.

The model quantifies direct emissions from cons truction and operation activities (including vehicle use), as well as indirect emissions, such as GHG emissions fr om off-site energy generation, solid waste disposal, vegetation pl anting and/or removal, and water use. The model also identifies design features to reduce criteria pollutant and GHG emissions. The model was developed for the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) in collaboration with the California air districts.

4.1 Construction Assumptions

Construction of the project is estimated to begin in the year 2023 and last approximately 12 months. Construction activities are expected to consist of demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. The project is expected to be operational in the year 2024. For purposes of this analysis, construction phases are not expected to overlap. The project site currently consists of approximately 44,572 square feet of existing buildings and approximately 52,250 square feet of existing parking lot area that is expected to be demolished as a part of the project. The project is not expected to require the import or export any earthwork material during grading phase; preliminary earthwork estimates show a balanced site.

The CalEEMod default construction equipment list is based on survey data and the size of the site. The parameters used to estimate co nstruction emissions, such as the worker and vendor trips and trip lengths, utilize the Ca lEEMod defaults. The construction equipment list is shown in Table 10.

The project will be required to comply with several standard fugitive dust control measures, per SCAQMD Rule 403. The followi ng key inputs are utilized in CalEEMod and are based upon data provided from SCAQMD
6:

6 SCAQMD. Fugitive Dust Mitigation Measures. http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air- quality-analysis-handbook/mitigation-measures-and-control-efficiencies/fugitive-dust 615

4-2

• Utilize soil stabilizers - 30% PM10 and PM2.5 reduction. • Replace ground cover - 15% PM10 and PM2.5 reduction.
• Water exposed areas 2x per day.
• Unpaved road moisture content – 25%.
• Unpaved road vehicle speed – 15 mph.

Table 10
Construction Equipment Assumptions1
Phase Equipment Number
Hours
Per
Day
Soil
Disturbance
Rate
(Acres/
8hr-Day)2
Off-Road
Equipment
Daily
Disturbance
Footprint
(Acres)
Total Daily
Disturbance
Footprint
(Acres)
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 0.0 0.00

2.0 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 0.5 0.50
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8 0.5 1.50
Site
Preparation
Graders 1 8 0.5 0.50

1.9 Scrapers 1 8 1.0 1.00
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7 0.5 0.44
Grading
Graders 1 8 0.5 0.50

1.9 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 0.5 0.50
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7 0.5 0.88
Building
Construction
Cranes 1 8 0.0 0.00

0.4 Forklifts 2 7 0.0 0.00
Generator Sets 1 8 0.0 0.00
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6 0.5 0.38
Welders 3 8 0.0 0.00
Paving
Cement and Mortar
Mixers 1 8 0.0 0.00

0.5 Pavers 1 8 0.0 0.00
Paving Equipment 1 8 0.0 0.00
Rollers 2 8 0.0 0.00
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 0.5 0.50
Architectural
Coating Air Compressors 1 6 0.0 0.00 0.0
1 CalEEMod Defaults

616

4-3

4.2 Localized Construction An alysis Modeling Parameters

CalEEMod calculates construction emissions based on the number of equipment hours and the maximum daily disturbance activity possible for each piece of equipment. This report identifies the following parameters in the proj ect design or applicable mitigation measures in order to compare CalEEMod reported em issions against the localized significance threshold lookup tables:

1) The off-road equipment list (including type of equipment, horsepower, and hours of operation) assumed for the day of construction activity with maximum emissions. 2) The maximum number of acres disturbed on the peak day. 3) Any emission control devices added onto off-road equipment. 4) Specific dust suppression techniques used on the day of constr uction activity with maximum emissions.

Based on recent discussions with SCAQMD, the Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds should no longer be used to determine disturbance acreage for the localized analysis.

4.3 Operational Assumptions

Operational emissions occur over the life of the project and are considered “long-term” sources of emissions. Operationa l emissions include both direct and indirect sources. This section briefly describes the operational sources of emissions analyzed for the project.

4.3.1 Mobile Source Emissions

Mobile source emissions are the largest so urce of long-term air pollutants from the operation of the project. Mobile sources are direct sources of project emissions that are primarily attributed to tailpipe exhaust and road dust (tire, brake, clutch, and road surface wear) from motor vehicles traveling to and from the site.

Estimates of mobile source emissions require information on four parameters: trip generation, trip length, vehicle/fleet mix, and emission factors (quantity of emission for each mile traveled or time spent idling by each vehicle).

The trip generation rates, trip length and trip percentages fo r this project are based on the 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project Trip Generation & VMT Study, City of Ontario, dated March 2, 2021 by RK Engineering Group.
617

4-4

Trip summary information is shown in Table 11.

Table 11
Trip Generation Rates
Land Use ITE Code Units1
Daily Trip Rate2
Weekday Saturday3 Sunday3
Multifamily Mid Rise – Close to Transit 221 DU 2.01 4.55 3.86 Strip Mall (<40k square feet) 822 TSF 49.1 65.7 65.7
1 DU = Dwelling Unit; TSF = Thousand Square Feet
2 Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition
3 Saturday and Sunday trip rates are estimated by multiplying Saturday peak hour rate with 10.

The Emission Factors (EMFAC2017) 2017 model and off-model adjustments factors to account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule is used to estimate the mobile source emissions are embedded in the CalEEMod emissions model. No adjustments have been made to default emission factors.

The project’s total vehicle miles traveled esti mated by CalEEMod is shown in the Table 12 for this project.

Table 12
Operational Vehicle Miles Traveled
1 Land Use Annual Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT)
Proposed Mixed Use Project 1,531,340
1 CalEEMod defaults.

The operational vehicle fleet mix has been adjus ted to reflect vehicle types used for typical residential and commercial trips generated by the project. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) regional tr avel demand model does not include heavy- duty trucks, buses or other large vehicles that would require passenger car equivalent (PCE) adjustments for residential home-based trips. The project does not consist of land uses that would typically require PCE adjustments to account for large trucks, such as warehousing.

To be conservative, the Air Quality/GHG an alysis has assumed that 2% of the total residential home-based trips will include trucks with a gross ve hicle weight rating (GVWR) of 10,000 pound or greater. This includes LHD2, MHD, HHD, OBUS, UBUS, and SBUS vehicles. The 2% mix is also consistent wi th the default Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 618

4-5

assumptions. The adjusted vehicle mix is prop ortioned according to the default CalEEMod vehicle mix.

Table 13 summarizes vehicle mix used for this project.

Table 13
Operational Vehicle Mix1
YUY Vehicle Mix (%)
Light Duty Automobile (LDA) 55.35%
Light Duty Truck (LDTI) 5.74%
Light Duty Truck (LDT2) 17.68%
Medium Duty Truck (MDV) 13.97%
Light Heavy Truck (LHD1) 2.69%
Light Heavy Truck (LHD2) 0.33%
Medium Heavy Truck (MHD) 0.55%
Heavy Heavy Truck (HHD) 0.81%
Other Bus (OBUS) 0.03%
Urban Bus (UBUS) 0.01%
Motorcycle (MCY) 2.57%
School Bus (SBUS) 0.04%
Motor Home (MH) 0.23%
Total 100.0%
1 Adjusted fleet mix to include 2% total trucks over 10,000 lbs. GVWR. (LHD2, MHD, HHD, OBUS, UBUS,

SBUS, MH)

4.3.2 Energy Source Emissions

Energy usage includes both direct and indire ct sources of emissions. Direct sources of emissions include on-site natu ral gas usage (non-hearth) for heating, while indirect emissions include electricity generated by offsite power plants. Natural gas use is measured in units of a thousand British Thermal Units (kBTU) per size metric for each land use subtype and electricity use is measured in ki lowatt hours (kWh) per size metric for each land use subtype.

CalEEMod divides building electric ity and natural gas use into us es that are subject to Title 24 standards and those that are not. Lighting electricity usage is also calculated as a separate category in CalEEMod. For electricity, Title 24 uses include the major building 619

4-6

envelope systems covered by Part 6 (California Energy Code) of Title 24, such as space heating, space cooling, water heating, and ve ntilation. Non-Title 24 uses include all other end uses, such as appliances, electronics, an d other miscellaneous plug-in uses. Because some lighting is not considered as part of the building envelope energy budget, and since a separate mitigation measure is applicable to this end use, CalEEM od makes lighting a separate category.

For natural gas, uses are likewise categorize d as Title 24 or Non-Ti tle 24. Title 24 uses include building heating and hot water end us es. Non-Title 24 natural gas uses include cooking and appliances (including pool/spa heaters).

The baseline values are based on the Calif ornia Energy Commission (CEC) sponsored California Commercial End Us e Survey (CEUS) and Resident ial Appliance Saturation Survey (RASS) studies.

Table 14 shows the total annual expected electricity and natural gas usage for the proposed project.

Table 14
Electricity and Natural Gas Usage
Land Use Electricity Usage1
(KWhr/yr)2
Natural Gas Usage1
(KBTU/yr)2
Apartments Mid Rise 431,641.0 1,567,660.0
Strip Mall 65,021.0 11,783.2
Parking Lot 22,680.0 --
Total 519,342.0 1,579,443.2
1 CalEEMod default estimates.
2 KWhr/yr = Kilowatt Hours per Year
KBTU/yr = Thousand British Thermal Units per Year

4.3.3 Area Source Emissions

Area source emissions are direct sources of emissions that fall under four categories; hearths, consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. Per SCAQMD rule 445, no wood burnin g devices are allowed in ne w developments; therefore, no wood hearths are included in this project.

620

4-7

Consumer products are various solvents used in non-industrial applications which emit ROGs during their product use. These typicall y include cleaning supplies, kitchen aerosols, cosmetics and toiletries.

4.3.4 Other Sources of Operational Emissions

Water. Greenhouse gas emissions are generated from the upstream energy required to supply and treat the water used on the project site. Indirect emissions from water usage are counted as part of the project’s overall impact. The estimated water usage for the project is reported in Table 15 and recommen dations to reduce water usage are discussed in Section 6.0.

Waste. CalEEMod calculates the indirect GHG emissions associated with waste that is disposed of at a landfill. The program uses an nual waste disposal rates from the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) data for individual land uses.

The program quantifies the GHG emissions associated with the decomposition of the waste which generates methane based on the total amount of degradable organic carbon.

The estimated waste generation by the project is reported in Table 15 and recommendations to reduce waste generation in landfills are discussed in Section 6.0

Table 15
Operational Water Usage and Waste Generation
Land Use
Water Usage
(gallons/year)
Waste
Generation
(tons/year)1 Indoor Outdoor Total
Apartments Mid Rise 7,101,788.79 4,477,214.67 11,579,003.46 50.14 Strip Mall 397,028.72 243,340.18 640,368.90 5.63
Total 7,498,817.51 4,720,554.85 12,219,372.36 55.77
1 CalEEMod default estimates.

621

5-1

5.0 Significance Thresholds

5.1 Air Quality Significance Thresholds

The SCAQMD has established air quality emissions thresholds for criteria air pollutants for the purposes of determining whether a proj ect may have a significant effect on the environment per Section 15002(g) of the Guidelines for implementing CEQA. By complying with the thresholds of significance, the proj ect would be in compliance with the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) and the federal and state air quality standards.

Table 16 lists the air quality significance thresholds for the six air pollutants analyzed in this report. Lead is not included as part of this analysis as the project is not expected to emit lead in any significant measurable quantity.

Table 16
SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds
Pollutant Construction (lbs/day) Operation (lbs/day)
NOX 100 55
VOC 75 55
PM10 150 150
PM2.5 55 55
SOX 150 150
CO 550 550
1 Source: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance- thresholds.pdf

5.2 Air Quality Localized Significance Thresholds

Air quality emissions were analyzed using th e SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Localized Significant Threshold (LST) Look-up Tables.

Table 17 lists the Localized Significance Thresholds (LST) used to determine whether a project may generate significan t adverse localized air quality impacts. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a projec t that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most string ent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. 622

5-2

LSTs are developed based on th e ambient concentrations of four applicable air pollutants for source receptor area (SRA) 34 –Central San Bernardino Valley.

The nearest existing sensitive receptors ar e located to the northeast of the site, approximately 90 feet or 27 meters away from potential areas of on-site construction and operational activity. To be conservative, th e LST at 25 meters is utilized. The daily disturbance area is calculated to be 2.0 acres.

Table 17
SCAQMD Localized Significance Thresholds
1 (LST)
Pollutant Construction (lbs/day) Operation (lbs/day)
NOX 170.0 170.0
CO 972.0 972.0
PM10 7.0 2.0
PM2.5 4.0 1.0
1 Source: SCAQMD Mass Rate Localized Significance Thresholds for 2-acre site in SRA-34 at 25 meters

5.3 City of Ontario General Plan

The City of Ontario describes several goals and policies for addressing air quality and greenhouse gas in the General Plan ER4 Air Quality. The following policy goals are aimed at providing guidance and policy direction in pr oviding better indoor and outdoor air quality for Ontario and the air basin will improve the quality of life of residents, workers and visitors, decrease health care costs and make Ontario more pr osperous by making the City a more desirable place to be.

GOAL ER4: Improved indoor and outdoor air quality and reduced locally generated pollutant emissions
ER4-1 Land Use. We reduce GHG and other local pollutant emissions through compact, mixed use, and transit-oriented development and development that improves the regional jobs-housing balance.

ER4-2 Sensitive Land Uses. We prohibit the future siting of sensitive land uses, within the distances defined by the California Air Resources Board for specific source categories, without sufficient mitigation. 623

5-3

ER4-3 Greenhouse Gases (GHG) Emissions Reductions. We will reduce GHG emissions in accordance with regional, state and federal regulations.

ER4-4 Indoor Air Quality. We will comply with State Green Building Codes relative to indoor air quality.

ER4-5 Transportation. We promote mass transit and non-motorized mobility options (e.g. walking, biking) to reduce air pollutant emissions.

ER4-6 Particulate Matter. We support efforts to reduce particulate matter to meet State and Federal Clean Air Standards.

ER4-7 Other Agency Collaboration. We collaborate with other agencies within the South Coast Air Basin to improve regional air quality at the emission source.

5.4 City of Ontario Community Climate Action Plan (CCAP)

The City of Ontario has adopted the Community Climate Action Plan (CCAP) to help reduce citywide GHG emissions and align the City wi th the statewide Scoping Plan GHG reduction efforts.

The CCAP has established Screen ing Tables, which are setup si milar to a checklist, with points allocated to certain elements of the project that would cont ribute to reduced GHG emissions. If a project garners 100 points (by including enough GHG reducing elements), then the project is consistent with Ontari o City’s Community Cl imate Action Plan for reducing emissions and the impa ct may be considered less than significant for purposes of CEQA.
624

6-1

6.0 Air Quality Impact Analysis

Consistent with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, a significant impact related to air quality would occur if the proposed project is determined to:

a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan.

b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard.

c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.

d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.

6.1 Short Term Air Quality Impacts - Construction

6.1.1 Daily Emissions - Construction

Daily air quality emissions include both on-s ite and off-site emissions associated with construction of the project. Regional daily emi ssions of criteria pollutants are compared to the SCAQMD thresholds of significance.

As shown in Table 18, daily emissions of criter ia pollutants are expected to be below the allowable thresholds of significance.

CalEEMod daily emissions outputs are provided in Appendix A.

625

6-2

Table 18
Daily Construction Emissions
Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day)1
Activity VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Demolition 1.58 16.90 14.68 0.04 3.06 1.08
Site Preparation 1.33 14.30 10.08 0.03 1.24 0.59
Grading 1.37 14.49 9.08 0.02 3.43 1.90
Building Construction 2.16 14.74 18.59 0.04 1.97 0.96
Paving 1.32 8.65 12.25 0.02 0.60 0.45
Architectural Coating 37.76 1.36 2.60 0.01 0.31 0.13
Maximum1 37.76 16.90 18.59 0.04 3.43 1.90
SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Threshold (?) No No No No No No
1 Maximum daily emission during summer or winter; includes both on-site and off-site project emissions.

The project must follow man datory SCAQMD rules and requ irements with regards to fugitive dust control, as described in Sect ion 6.1.3. Compliance with the standard dust control measures is considered to be part of the conditions of approval for the project and built into the design features.

Table 18 shows that, the project’s daily construction emissions will be below the applicable SCAQMD air quality standards and thresholds of significance. As a result, the project would not contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation.

Furthermore, by complying with the SCAQMD standards, the project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutan t for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or Stat e ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors).

The project’s short-term construction im pact on regional air resources is less than significant.

6.1.2 Localized Emissions - Construction

Table 19 illustrates the construction related localized emissions and compares the results to SCAQMD LST thresholds. As shown in Table 21, the emissions will be below the SCAQMD 626

6-3

thresholds of significance for localized cons truction emissions. The project must follow all standard SCAQMD rules and requ irements with regards to fu gitive dust control, as described in Section 6.1.3. Compliance with the dust control is considered a standard requirement and included as part of the project’s design features, not mitigation.

The project’s short-term construction impa ct to localized air resources is less than significant.

Table 19
Localized Construction Emissions
Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day)1
Activity NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
On-site Emissions 14.47 14.21 3.31 1.87
SCAQMD Construction Threshold2 170.0 972.0 7.0 4.0
Exceeds Threshold (?) No No No No
1 Maximum daily emission during summer or winter; includes on-site project emissions only. 2 Reference 2006-2008 SCAQMD Mass Rate Localized Significant Thresholds for construction and operation.

SRA-34, Central San Bernardino Valley, 2-acre site, receptor distance 25 meters.

6.1.3 Fugitive Dust - Construction

The Project is required to comply with regional rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emissions associated with suspended particulate matter, also known as fugitive dust. Fugitive dust emissions are commonly associated with la nd clearing activities, cut- and-fill grading operations, an d exposure of soils to the air and wind. SCAQMD Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust is controlled with best-available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visibl e in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. In addition, SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 require implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off site.

To ensure full compliance with the applicable dust control standards, the following project design are recommended for the project:

DF-1 The project must follow the standar d SCAQMD rules and re quirements with regards to fugitive dust control, whic h includes, but are not limited to the following:

1. All active construction areas shall be watered two (2) times daily.

2. Speed on unpaved roads shall be reduced to less than 15 mph. 627

6-4

3. Any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway shall be swept or washed at the site access points within 30 minutes.

4. Any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material shall be covered or watered twice daily.

5. All operations on any unpaved surface shall be suspended if winds exceed 15 mph.

6. Access points shall be washed or swept daily.

7. Construction sites shall be sandbagged for erosion control.

8. Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers’ specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or more).

10. Pave or gravel construction access roads at least 100 feet onto the site from the main road and use gravel aprons at truck exits.

11. Replace the ground cover of disturbed areas as quickly possible.

6.1.4 Odors - Construction

Heavy-duty equipment in the project area du ring construction will emit odors; however, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed.

The project is required to comply with Rule 402 during construction, which states that a person shall not discharge from any source what soever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, de triment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the pub lic, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural t e n d e n c y t o c a u s e , i n j u r y o r d a m a g e t o business or property. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed Project.

Therefore, the project impact from odor emissions is less than significant.

6.1.5 Asbestos - Construction

Asbestos is a carcinogen and is categori zed as a hazardous air pollutant by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Asbe stos fibers imbedded within construction materials become a health haza rd once they are disturbed and rendered airborne, such as through physical contact like building renovation and demolition activities. Asbestos is 628

6-5

regulated through the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and SCAQMD is the local enforcement authority for asbestos.

The project includes demolition of existing structures that would be subject to the National Emissions Standards for Asbestos (40CFR Part 61 Subpart M). Prior to demolition of existing structures, an asbestos evaluation must be completed in accordance with the Asbestos NESHAP regulations. Section 61.145 re quires written notification of demolition operations. Asbestos NESHAP demolition/Renovation Notification Form can be downloaded at http://www.arb.ca.gov/enf/asbestosform.pdf.

Asbestos also occurs naturally in serpentine and ultramafic rock. Based on the California Division of Mines and Geology Ge neral Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California - Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos, naturally occurring asbestos has not been shown to occur within in the vicinity of the project site. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small.

In the event asbestos is found on the site, th e project will be required to comply with SCAQMD and NESHAP standards and protocols. SCAQMD Rule 1403 establishes the survey requirements, notification, and work practice requirements to prevent asbestos emissions during construction activities.

By following the required asbestos abatement protocols, the project impact is less than significant.

6.1.6 Diesel Particulate Matter - Construction

The project will generate diesel particulate matter (DPM) during construction from off-road diesel equipment and trucks. The California Office of Environm ental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) adopted the Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments (HRA Guidelines) to provide proc edures for use in the Air Toxics Hot Spots Program or for the permitting of existing, new, or modified stationary sources. 7 The HRA Guidelines provide risk factors based on exposure to toxic substances over a 30- year lifetime span. The proposed project’s cons truction activity is not expected to be a long-term (i.e., 30 years) source of toxic ai r contaminant emissions and short-term risk factors have not been developed. Due the si gnificantly reduced risk from short-term

7 OEHHA. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program. Risk Assessment Guidelines. Guidance for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. February 2015.
629

6-6

exposure, SCAQMD does not typically require the evaluation of long-term cancer risk or chronic health impacts for construction operations from a project such as the one being proposed.

Hence, the impacts from short- term exposure to DMP during project construction may be presumed to be less than significant without the need for a detailed HRA study.

To help further reduce the potential health risks associated with DPM exposure during construction, the following project design features are recommended. Project design features include a recommendation for Tier 4 engines on all off-road diesel equipment. Tier 4 engines, along with the latest national fuel standards, have been shown to yield PM reductions of over 95% from the typical Tier 2 and Tier 3 engines. 8 Thus ensuring the
potential DPM exposure to adjacent sensitive receptors is reduced to the maximum extent feasible.

DF-3 Construction equipment should be maintained in proper tune.

DF-4 All construction vehicles should be pr ohibited from excessive idling. Excessive idling is defined as five (5) minutes or longer.

DF-5 Minimize the simultaneous operati on of multiple construction equipment units, to the maximum extent feasible.

DF-6 The use of heavy construction equipm ent and earthmoving activity should be suspended during Air Alerts when the Air Quality Index reaches the “Unhealthy” level.

DF-7 Establish an electricity supply to the construction site and use electric powered equipment instead of diesel -powered equipment or generators, where feasible.

8 EPA. Control of Emissions of Air Pollution from Nonroad Diesel Engines and Fuel; Final Rule. (40 CFR Parts 9, 69, et al.)
630

6-7

DF-8 Establish staging areas for the cons truction equipment that as far from adjacent residential homes, as feasible.

DF-9 Use haul trucks with on-road engines instead of off-road engines for on-site hauling.

6.2 Long Term Air Qualit y Impacts - Operation

6.2.1 Daily Emissions - Operation

Long-term operational air pollutant impacts fr om the project are shown in Table 20. The project is not expected to exceed any of the allowable daily emissions thresholds for criteria pollutants at the regional level. CalEEMod daily emissions outputs are provided in Appendix A.

The project’s daily operational emissions will be below the applicable SCAQMD air quality thresholds of significance and the project would not contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Furthermor e, by complying with the SCAQMD standards, the project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors).

The project related long-term air quality impacts are less than significant.

631

6-8

Table 20
Daily Operational Emissions
Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day)1
Activity VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Mobile Sources 2.60 2.57 23.29 0.05 5.00 1.35
Energy Sources 0.05 0.40 0.17 0.00 0.03 0.03
Area Sources 2.94 1.64 9.66 0.01 0.17 0.17
Total 5.60 4.61 33.12 0.06 5.20 1.56
SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Threshold (?) No No No No No No
1 Maximum daily emission during summer or winter; includes both on-site and off-site project emissions. 2 Daily emissions reports are provided in Appendix A.

6.2.2 Localized Operationa l Emissions - Operation

Table 21 shows the localized operational emi ssions and compares the results to SCAQMD LST thresholds of significance. As shown in Table 21, the emissions will be below the SCAQMD thresholds of significance for localized operational emissions. The project will result in less than significant localized operational emissions impacts.

Table 21
Localized Operational Emissions
Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day)1
LST Pollutants
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
(lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day)
On-site Emissions1 1.31 6.00 0.3 0.2
SCAQMD Operation Threshold2 46.0 231.0 1.0 1.0
Exceeds Threshold (?) No No No No
1 Maximum daily emission in summer or winter.
2 Mobile source emissions include on-site vehicle emissions only. It is estimated that approximately 5% of mobile emissions will occur on the project site.
3 Reference: 2006-2008 SCAQMD Mass Rate Localized Significant Thresholds for construction and operation Table C-1 through C-6; SRA 34, Central San Bernardino Valley disturbance area of 2-acre and receptor distance of 25 meters.

632

6-9

6.2.3 Odors - Operation

Land uses that commonly rece ive odor complaints include ag ricultural uses (farming and livestock), chemical plants, composting oper ations, dairies, fiberglass molding facilities, food processing plants, landfills, refineries, rail yards, and wastewater treatment plants. The proposed project does not contain land uses that would typically be associated with significant odor emissions.

The project will be required to comply with standard building code requirements related to exhaust ventilation, as well as comply with SCAQMD Rule 402. Rule 402 requires that a person may not discharge from any source what soever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, de triment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the pub lic, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to busi ness or property. Project related odors are not expected to meet the criteria of being a nuisance. The project’s operation would result in less than significant odor impacts.

6.2.4 Toxic Air Contaminants - Operations

The project would consist of mixed use consisti ng of commercial and residential land uses.

These types of projects do not include majo r sources of toxic air contaminants (TAC) emissions that would result in significant exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Therefore, the project impact is considered less than significant.

633

7-1

7.0 Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

Consistent with CEQA Guidelines, a significant impact related to greenhouse gas would occur if the proposed project is determined to:

a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either di rectly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment.

b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases.

For purposes of this project, the City of Ontario CCAP establishe s the requirements for determining whether a project would have a significant impact to GHG emissions under CEQA.

The CCAP uses Screening Tables, which are se tup similar to a checklist, with points allocated to certain elements of the project to reduce GHG emissions. If a project garners 100 points (by including enough GHG reducing el ements), then the project is consistent with CCAP and the impact may be considered less than significant for purposes of CEQA.

The proposed project is expected to comply with the CCAP by implementing the Screening Table requirements into the project design. To help ensure the project adheres to the CCAP requirements, the following project design feature is provided:

DF-10 Implement the GHG Reduction Measur es from the Ontario County Climate Action Plan (CAP) Screening Tables to achieve at least 100 points, per the requirements for Mixed Use Projects.

For mixed use projects, both the residential and non-residential screen ing tables shall be completed. Mixed use Projects that garner at least 100 points will be consistent with the reduction quantities in the City’s CAP and are considered less than significant for GHG emissions. A copy of the Screening Tables is provided in Appendix C.

Therefore, with the implementation of the CCAP Screening Tables, the project is not expected to generate GHG emissions, either di rectly or indirectly, that would cause a significant impact on the enviro nment. Also, by complying with the CCAP, the project will not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases and the impact is considered less than significant.

634

7-2

Furthermore, since the purpose of the City’s CCAP is to ensure compliance with the state’s climate initiatives for reducing GHG emissions , by complying with the CCAP, the project will also be in compliant with the broader statewide goals for combating climate change; such as those required in the CARB Scoping Plan and AB 32.

The mixed-use project is also located within cl ose proximity to high quality transit, located within half a mile from the nearest Ontario Train Station, and offers high-density residential development near commercial uses. The proj ect will include pedestrian friendly and walkable design that will encourage fewer auto-based trips.

The following project design features will be implemented to ensure the project is consistent with applicable GHG reduction standards.

DF-11 The project will comply with the man datory requirements of the California Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 6 (Energy Code) and Part 11 (CALGreen), including, but not limited to:

• Install low flow fixtures and toilets, water efficient irrigation systems, drought tolerant/native landscaping, and reduce the amount of turf.

• Provide the necessary infrastructu re to support electric vehicle charging.

• Provide solar installations per the prescribed Energy Design Ratings.

DF-12 Participate in the local waste management recycling and composting programs.

DF-13 Encourage the property management company and landscape maintenance crews to use electric powered la ndscaping equipment for landscape maintenance.

As a result, the project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases and the impact is considered less than significant.
635
______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Exhibits
636
engineering
group, inc.
engineering
N N
Location Map
Exhibit A
414 & 440 EUCLID AVENUE MIXED USE PROJECT AIR QUALITY & GREENHOUSE GAS STUDY, City of Ontario, CA 3004-2021-03
SITE
637
engineering
group, inc.
engineering
N N
Site Plan
Exhibit B
414 & 440 EUCLID AVENUE MIXED USE PROJECT AIR QUALITY & GREENHOUSE GAS STUDY, City of Ontario, CA 3004-2021-03 638
______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Appendices

639

Appendix A

Daily Emissions Calculations Output
(CalEEMod)
640
414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project
San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - The project proposes to construct and operate 109 multifamily residential homes and 5,356 square feet of ground floor general commercial use on approximately 2.3 acre vacant site.

Construction Phase - Construction phases are adjusted to meet opening year 2023.

Demolition - The project site currently consists of approximately 44,572 square feet of existing buildings and approximately 52,250 square feet of existing parking lot area and expected to demolition as a part of the project.

Vehicle Trips - Trip Generation rates are based 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project Trip Generation & VMT Study, City of Ontario and ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition.

Woodstoves - SCAQMD Rule 445 restricts wood burning hearths/fireplaces from being installed in new development.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust control.

Area Mitigation -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 162.00 Space 1.46 64,800.00 0
Apartments Mid Rise 109.00 Dwelling Unit 0.72 109,000.00 312 Strip Mall 5.36 1000sqft 0.12 5,356.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 32

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2024Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 1 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 641
Energy Mitigation - The project will be required to instal solar panels capable of meeting the California Energy Code Design Rating for all residential dwellings. (Assumes 80% of demand generated by renewable sources).

Fleet Mix - Operational fleet mix adjusted to equal 2% trucks with GVWR > 10,000 lbs.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 200.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 5.45 0.00
tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 8.1500e-003
tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 8.1500e-003
tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 8.1500e-003
tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.55
tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.55
tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.55
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.18
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.18
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.18
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1040e-003 3.3180e-003
tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1040e-003 3.3180e-003
tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1040e-003 3.3180e-003
tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.03
tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.03
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 2 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 642
tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.03
tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.14
tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.14
tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.14
tblFleetMix MH 4.8300e-003 2.2560e-003
tblFleetMix MH 4.8300e-003 2.2560e-003
tblFleetMix MH 4.8300e-003 2.2560e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 5.4550e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 5.4550e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 5.4550e-003
tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5400e-004 2.5900e-004
tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5400e-004 2.5900e-004
tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5400e-004 2.5900e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 4.4600e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 4.4600e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 4.4600e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5100e-004 1.1700e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5100e-004 1.1700e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5100e-004 1.1700e-004
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 5,360.00 5,356.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.87 0.72
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 4.55
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 42.04 65.70
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 3.86
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 20.43 65.70
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 2.01
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 44.32 49.10
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 3 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 643

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 37.7593 16.7687 18.5881 0.0398 7.1944 0.7028 7.7993 3.4544 0.6578 4.0109 0.0000 3,824.120 5 3,824.120
5 0.7700 0.2166 3,884.783
9 Maximum 37.7593 16.7687 18.5881 0.0398 7.1944 0.7028 7.7993 3.4544 0.6578 4.0109 0.0000 3,824.120 5 3,824.120
5 0.7700 0.2166 3,884.783
9 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 37.7593 16.7687 18.5881 0.0398 2.8209 0.7028 3.4258 1.3396 0.6578 1.8961 0.0000 3,824.120 5 3,824.120
5 0.7700 0.2166 3,884.783
9 Maximum 37.7593 16.7687 18.5881 0.0398 2.8209 0.7028 3.4258 1.3396 0.6578 1.8961 0.0000 3,824.120 5 3,824.120
5 0.7700 0.2166 3,884.783
9 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.79 0.00 56.08 61.22 0.00 52.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 4 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 644
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 5 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 645

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 2.9443 1.6406 9.6599 0.0103 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.0000 1,978.228 8 1,978.228
8 0.0532 0.0360 1,990.278
8 Energy 0.0467 0.3990 0.1711 2.5500e-
003

0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 509.0861 509.0861 9.7600e-
003

9.3300e-
003
512.1114
Mobile 2.6040 2.4102 23.2903 0.0474 4.9654 0.0323 4.9978 1.3206 0.0301 1.3507 4,901.920 6 4,901.920
6 0.2691 0.1953 4,966.861
4 Total 5.5950 4.4498 33.1213 0.0603 4.9654 0.2387 5.2042 1.3206 0.2365 1.5571 0.0000 7,389.235 6 7,389.235
6 0.3321 0.2406 7,469.251
6 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 2.9443 1.6406 9.6599 0.0103 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.0000 1,978.228 8 1,978.228
8 0.0532 0.0360 1,990.278
8 Energy 0.0467 0.3990 0.1711 2.5500e-
003

0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 509.0861 509.0861 9.7600e-
003

9.3300e-
003
512.1114
Mobile 2.6040 2.4102 23.2903 0.0474 4.9654 0.0323 4.9978 1.3206 0.0301 1.3507 4,901.920 6 4,901.920
6 0.2691 0.1953 4,966.861
4 Total 5.5950 4.4498 33.1213 0.0603 4.9654 0.2387 5.2042 1.3206 0.2365 1.5571 0.0000 7,389.235 6 7,389.235
6 0.3321 0.2406 7,469.251
6 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 6 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 646

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/2/2023 1/27/2023 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/28/2023 2/1/2023 5 3 3 Grading Grading 2/2/2023 2/9/2023 5 6
4 Building Construction Building Construction 2/10/2023 11/16/2023 5 200 5 Paving Paving 11/17/2023 11/30/2023 5 10
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/1/2023 12/28/2023 5 20 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 220,725; Residential Outdoor: 73,575; Non-Residential Indoor: 8,034; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,678; Striped Parking Area: 3,888 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 6
Acres of Paving: 1.46
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 7 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 647

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Soil Stabilizer
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 440.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 107.00 23.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 21.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 8 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 648

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.7654 0.0000 4.7654 0.7215 0.0000 0.7215 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 0.6766 0.6766 0.6328 0.6328 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Total 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 4.7654 0.6766 5.4420 0.7215 0.6328 1.3543 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 9 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 649

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0530 2.4196 0.7370 0.0124 0.3853 0.0255 0.4107 0.1056 0.0244 0.1300 1,346.778 1 1,346.778
1 0.0575 0.2135 1,411.829
2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0508 0.0307 0.4902 1.3000e-
003

0.1453 7.2000e-
004

0.1460 0.0385 6.6000e-
004

0.0392 132.8169 132.8169 3.1700e-
003

3.1200e-
003
133.8269
Total 0.1038 2.4503 1.2272 0.0137 0.5306 0.0262 0.5567 0.1442 0.0250 0.1692 1,479.595 0 1,479.595
0 0.0606 0.2166 1,545.656
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.8228 0.0000 1.8228 0.2760 0.0000 0.2760 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 0.6766 0.6766 0.6328 0.6328 0.0000 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Total 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 1.8228 0.6766 2.4994 0.2760 0.6328 0.9088 0.0000 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 10 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 650

0.1453 7.2000e-
004

0.1460 0.0385 6.6000e-
004

0.0392 132.8169 132.8169 3.1700e-
003

3.1200e-
003
133.8269
Total 0.1038 2.4503 1.2272 0.0137 0.5306 0.0262 0.5567 0.1442 0.0250 0.1692 1,479.595 0 1,479.595
0 0.0606 0.2166 1,545.656
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3027 14.2802 9.7820 0.0245 0.5419 0.5419 0.4985 0.4985 2,374.863 4 2,374.863
4 0.7681 2,394.065
4 Total 1.3027 14.2802 9.7820 0.0245 1.5908 0.5419 2.1326 0.1718 0.4985 0.6703 2,374.863 4 2,374.863
4 0.7681 2,394.065
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 11 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 651

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0313 0.0189 0.3017 8.0000e-
004

0.0894 4.4000e-
004

0.0899 0.0237 4.1000e-
004

0.0241 81.7335 81.7335 1.9500e-
003

1.9200e-
003

82.3550
Total 0.0313 0.0189 0.3017 8.0000e-
004

0.0894 4.4000e-
004

0.0899 0.0237 4.1000e-
004

0.0241 81.7335 81.7335 1.9500e-
003

1.9200e-
003

82.3550
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.6085 0.0000 0.6085 0.0657 0.0000 0.0657 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3027 14.2802 9.7820 0.0245 0.5419 0.5419 0.4985 0.4985 0.0000 2,374.863 4 2,374.863
4 0.7681 2,394.065
4 Total 1.3027 14.2802 9.7820 0.0245 0.6085 0.5419 1.1503 0.0657 0.4985 0.5642 0.0000 2,374.863 4 2,374.863
4 0.7681 2,394.065
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 12 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 652

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0313 0.0189 0.3017 8.0000e-
004

0.0894 4.4000e-
004

0.0899 0.0237 4.1000e-
004

0.0241 81.7335 81.7335 1.9500e-
003

1.9200e-
003

82.3550
Total 0.0313 0.0189 0.3017 8.0000e-
004

0.0894 4.4000e-
004

0.0899 0.0237 4.1000e-
004

0.0241 81.7335 81.7335 1.9500e-
003

1.9200e-
003

82.3550
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Total 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 7.0826 0.6044 7.6869 3.4247 0.5560 3.9807 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 13 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 653

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0391 0.0236 0.3771 1.0000e-
003

0.1118 5.5000e-
004

0.1123 0.0296 5.1000e-
004

0.0302 102.1669 102.1669 2.4400e-
003

2.4000e-
003
102.9438
Total 0.0391 0.0236 0.3771 1.0000e-
003

0.1118 5.5000e-
004

0.1123 0.0296 5.1000e-
004

0.0302 102.1669 102.1669 2.4400e-
003

2.4000e-
003
102.9438
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.7091 0.0000 2.7091 1.3100 0.0000 1.3100 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 0.0000 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Total 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 2.7091 0.6044 3.3134 1.3100 0.5560 1.8660 0.0000 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 14 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 654

0.1118 5.5000e-
004

0.1123 0.0296 5.1000e-
004

0.0302 102.1669 102.1669 2.4400e-
003

2.4000e-
003
102.9438
Total 0.0391 0.0236 0.3771 1.0000e-
003

0.1118 5.5000e-
004

0.1123 0.0296 5.1000e-
004

0.0302 102.1669 102.1669 2.4400e-
003

2.4000e-
003
102.9438
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 15 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 655

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0269 0.8067 0.3385 4.1200e-
003

0.1474 6.0600e-
003

0.1534 0.0424 5.8000e-
003

0.0482 441.4118 441.4118 0.0115 0.0652 461.1252
Worker 0.4184 0.2525 4.0351 0.0107 1.1960 5.9100e-
003

1.2019 0.3172 5.4400e-
003

0.3226 1,093.185
3 1,093.185
3 0.0261 0.0257 1,101.498
6 Total 0.4453 1.0592 4.3736 0.0148 1.3434 0.0120 1.3553 0.3596 0.0112 0.3709 1,534.597 2 1,534.597
2 0.0377 0.0909 1,562.623
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 16 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 656

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0269 0.8067 0.3385 4.1200e-
003

0.1474 6.0600e-
003

0.1534 0.0424 5.8000e-
003

0.0482 441.4118 441.4118 0.0115 0.0652 461.1252
Worker 0.4184 0.2525 4.0351 0.0107 1.1960 5.9100e-
003

1.2019 0.3172 5.4400e-
003

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Paving 0.3825 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2627 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 17 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 657

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0587 0.0354 0.5657 1.5000e-
003

0.1677 8.3000e-
004

0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e-
004

0.0452 153.2503 153.2503 3.6600e-
003

3.6000e-
003
154.4157
Total 0.0587 0.0354 0.5657 1.5000e-
003

0.1677 8.3000e-
004

0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e-
004

0.0452 153.2503 153.2503 3.6600e-
003

3.6000e-
003
154.4157
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 0.0000 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Paving 0.3825 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2627 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 0.0000 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 18 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 658

0.1677 8.3000e-
004

0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e-
004

0.0452 153.2503 153.2503 3.6600e-
003

3.6000e-
003
154.4157
Total 0.0587 0.0354 0.5657 1.5000e-
003

0.1677 8.3000e-
004

0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e-
004

0.0452 153.2503 153.2503 3.6600e-
003

3.6000e-
003
154.4157
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 37.6772 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003

0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 19 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 659

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0821 0.0496 0.7919 2.1000e-
003

0.2347 1.1600e-
003

0.2359 0.0623 1.0700e-
003

0.0633 214.5504 214.5504 5.1200e-
003

5.0500e-
003
216.1820
Total 0.0821 0.0496 0.7919 2.1000e-
003

0.2347 1.1600e-
003

0.2359 0.0623 1.0700e-
003

0.0633 214.5504 214.5504 5.1200e-
003

5.0500e-
003
216.1820
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 37.4856 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003

0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 37.6772 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003

0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 20 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 660

0.2347 1.1600e-
003

0.2359 0.0623 1.0700e-
003

0.0633 214.5504 214.5504 5.1200e-
003

5.0500e-
003
216.1820
Total 0.0821 0.0496 0.7919 2.1000e-
003

0.2347 1.1600e-
003

0.2359 0.0623 1.0700e-
003

0.0633 214.5504 214.5504 5.1200e-
003

5.0500e-
003
216.1820
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 21 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 661
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.6040 2.4102 23.2903 0.0474 4.9654 0.0323 4.9978 1.3206 0.0301 1.3507 4,901.920 6 4,901.920
6 0.2691 0.1953 4,966.861
4 Unmitigated 2.6040 2.4102 23.2903 0.0474 4.9654 0.0323 4.9978 1.3206 0.0301 1.3507 4,901.920 6 4,901.920
6 0.2691 0.1953 4,966.861
4 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.553454 0.057396 0.176797 0.139748 0.026931 0.003318 0.005455 0.008150 0.000259 0.000117 0.025674 0.000446 0.002256 Parking Lot 0.553454 0.057396 0.176797 0.139748 0.026931 0.003318 0.005455 0.008150 0.000259 0.000117 0.025674 0.000446 0.002256 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 22 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 662
Strip Mall 0.553454 0.057396 0.176797 0.139748 0.026931 0.003318 0.005455 0.008150 0.000259 0.000117 0.025674 0.000446 0.002256

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0467 0.3990 0.1711 2.5500e-
003

0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 509.0861 509.0861 9.7600e-
003

9.3300e-
003
512.1114
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0467 0.3990 0.1711 2.5500e-
003

0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 509.0861 509.0861 9.7600e-
003

9.3300e-
003
512.1114

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Percent of Electricity Use Generated with Renewable Energy Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 23 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 663

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise
4294.95 0.0463 0.3958 0.1684 2.5300e-
003

0.0320 0.0320 0.0320 0.0320 505.2882 505.2882 9.6800e-
003

9.2600e-
003
508.2908
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Strip Mall 32.2827 3.5000e-
004

3.1600e-
003

2.6600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
004

3.7980 3.7980 7.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

3.8205
Total 0.0467 0.3990 0.1711 2.5500e-
003

0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 509.0861 509.0861 9.7500e-
003

9.3300e-
003
512.1114
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 24 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 664

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

4.29495 0.0463 0.3958 0.1684 2.5300e-
003

0.0320 0.0320 0.0320 0.0320 505.2882 505.2882 9.6800e-
003

9.2600e-
003
508.2908
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Strip Mall 0.0322827 3.5000e-
004

3.1600e-
003

2.6600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
004

3.7980 3.7980 7.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

3.8205
Total 0.0467 0.3990 0.1711 2.5500e-
003

0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 509.0861 509.0861 9.7500e-
003

9.3300e-
003
512.1114
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 25 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 665
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.9443 1.6406 9.6599 0.0103 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.0000 1,978.228 8 1,978.228
8 0.0532 0.0360 1,990.278
8 Unmitigated 2.9443 1.6406 9.6599 0.0103 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.0000 1,978.228 8 1,978.228
8 0.0532 0.0360 1,990.278
8 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.2054 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

2.2872 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.1799 1.5369 0.6540 9.8100e-
003

0.1243 0.1243 0.1243 0.1243 0.0000 1,962.000
0 1,962.000
0 0.0376 0.0360 1,973.659
2 Landscaping 0.2719 0.1037 9.0059 4.8000e-
004

0.0499 0.0499 0.0499 0.0499 16.2288 16.2288 0.0156 16.6196 Total 2.9443 1.6406 9.6599 0.0103 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.0000 1,978.228 8 1,978.228
8 0.0532 0.0360 1,990.278
8 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 26 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 666

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.2054 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

2.2872 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.1799 1.5369 0.6540 9.8100e-
003

0.1243 0.1243 0.1243 0.1243 0.0000 1,962.000
0 1,962.000
0 0.0376 0.0360 1,973.659
2 Landscaping 0.2719 0.1037 9.0059 4.8000e-
004

0.0499 0.0499 0.0499 0.0499 16.2288 16.2288 0.0156 16.6196 Total 2.9443 1.6406 9.6599 0.0103 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.0000 1,978.228 8 1,978.228
8 0.0532 0.0360 1,990.278
8 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 27 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 667

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 28 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 668
414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project
San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - The project proposes to construct and operate 109 multifamily residential homes and 5,356 square feet of ground floor general commercial use on approximately 2.3 acre vacant site.

Construction Phase - Construction phases are adjusted to meet opening year 2023.

Vehicle Trips - Trip Generation rates are based 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project Trip Generation & VMT Study, City of Ontario and ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition.

Woodstoves - SCAQMD Rule 445 restricts wood burning hearths/fireplaces from being installed in new development.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust control.

Area Mitigation -

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 32

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2024Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 1 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 669
Energy Mitigation - The project will be required to instal solar panels capable of meeting the California Energy Code Design Rating for all residential dwellings. (Assumes 80% of demand generated by renewable sources).

Fleet Mix - Operational fleet mix adjusted to equal 2% trucks with GVWR > 10,000 lbs.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 200.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 5.45 0.00
tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 8.1500e-003
tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 8.1500e-003
tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 8.1500e-003
tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.55
tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.55
tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.55
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.18
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.18
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.18
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1040e-003 3.3180e-003
tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1040e-003 3.3180e-003
tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1040e-003 3.3180e-003
tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.03
tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.03
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 2 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 670
tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.03
tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.14
tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.14
tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.14
tblFleetMix MH 4.8300e-003 2.2560e-003
tblFleetMix MH 4.8300e-003 2.2560e-003
tblFleetMix MH 4.8300e-003 2.2560e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 5.4550e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 5.4550e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 5.4550e-003
tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5400e-004 2.5900e-004
tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5400e-004 2.5900e-004
tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5400e-004 2.5900e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 4.4600e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 4.4600e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 4.4600e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5100e-004 1.1700e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5100e-004 1.1700e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5100e-004 1.1700e-004
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 5,360.00 5,356.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.87 0.72
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 4.55
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 42.04 65.70
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 3.86
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 20.43 65.70
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 2.01
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 44.32 49.10
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 3 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 671

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 37.7563 16.9014 17.8845 0.0388 7.1944 0.7028 7.7993 3.4544 0.6578 4.0109 0.0000 3,793.534 9 3,793.534
9 0.7700 0.2170 3,874.448
8 Maximum 37.7563 16.9014 17.8845 0.0388 7.1944 0.7028 7.7993 3.4544 0.6578 4.0109 0.0000 3,793.534 9 3,793.534
9 0.7700 0.2170 3,874.448
8 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 37.7563 16.9014 17.8845 0.0388 2.8209 0.7028 3.4258 1.3396 0.6578 1.8961 0.0000 3,793.534 9 3,793.534
9 0.7700 0.2170 3,874.448
8 Maximum 37.7563 16.9014 17.8845 0.0388 2.8209 0.7028 3.4258 1.3396 0.6578 1.8961 0.0000 3,793.534 9 3,793.534
9 0.7700 0.2170 3,874.448
8 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.79 0.00 56.08 61.22 0.00 52.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 4 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 672
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 5 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 673

0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 509.0861 509.0861 9.7600e-
003

9.3300e-
003
512.1114
Mobile 2.2487 2.5654 20.9428 0.0437 4.9654 0.0323 4.9978 1.3206 0.0301 1.3507 4,520.706 4 4,520.706
4 0.2781 0.2014 4,587.683
3 Total 5.2397 4.6050 30.7739 0.0566 4.9654 0.2387 5.2042 1.3206 0.2365 1.5571 0.0000 7,008.021 3 7,008.021
3 0.3411 0.2467 7,090.073
5 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 2.9443 1.6406 9.6599 0.0103 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.0000 1,978.228 8 1,978.228
8 0.0532 0.0360 1,990.278
8 Energy 0.0467 0.3990 0.1711 2.5500e-
003

0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 509.0861 509.0861 9.7600e-
003

9.3300e-
003
512.1114
Mobile 2.2487 2.5654 20.9428 0.0437 4.9654 0.0323 4.9978 1.3206 0.0301 1.3507 4,520.706 4 4,520.706
4 0.2781 0.2014 4,587.683
3 Total 5.2397 4.6050 30.7739 0.0566 4.9654 0.2387 5.2042 1.3206 0.2365 1.5571 0.0000 7,008.021 3 7,008.021
3 0.3411 0.2467 7,090.073
5 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 6 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 674

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 220,725; Residential Outdoor: 73,575; Non-Residential Indoor: 8,034; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,678; Striped Parking Area: 3,888 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 6
Acres of Paving: 1.46
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 7 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 675

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Soil Stabilizer
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 440.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 107.00 23.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 21.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 8 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 676

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.7654 0.0000 4.7654 0.7215 0.0000 0.7215 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 0.6766 0.6766 0.6328 0.6328 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Total 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 4.7654 0.6766 5.4420 0.7215 0.6328 1.3543 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 9 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 677

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0490 2.5507 0.7503 0.0124 0.3853 0.0255 0.4108 0.1056 0.0244 0.1300 1,348.810 3 1,348.810
3 0.0573 0.2138 1,413.952
2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0490 0.0323 0.4035 1.1800e-
003

0.1453 7.2000e-
004

0.1460 0.0385 6.6000e-
004

0.0392 120.3288 120.3288 3.1800e-
003

3.2200e-
003
121.3688
Total 0.0980 2.5830 1.1538 0.0136 0.5306 0.0262 0.5568 0.1442 0.0251 0.1692 1,469.139 0 1,469.139
0 0.0604 0.2170 1,535.321
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.8228 0.0000 1.8228 0.2760 0.0000 0.2760 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 0.6766 0.6766 0.6328 0.6328 0.0000 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Total 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 1.8228 0.6766 2.4994 0.2760 0.6328 0.9088 0.0000 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 10 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 678

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0490 2.5507 0.7503 0.0124 0.3853 0.0255 0.4108 0.1056 0.0244 0.1300 1,348.810 3 1,348.810
3 0.0573 0.2138 1,413.952
2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0490 0.0323 0.4035 1.1800e-
003

0.1453 7.2000e-
004

0.1460 0.0385 6.6000e-
004

0.0392 120.3288 120.3288 3.1800e-
003

3.2200e-
003
121.3688
Total 0.0980 2.5830 1.1538 0.0136 0.5306 0.0262 0.5568 0.1442 0.0251 0.1692 1,469.139 0 1,469.139
0 0.0604 0.2170 1,535.321
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3027 14.2802 9.7820 0.0245 0.5419 0.5419 0.4985 0.4985 2,374.863 4 2,374.863
4 0.7681 2,394.065
4 Total 1.3027 14.2802 9.7820 0.0245 1.5908 0.5419 2.1326 0.1718 0.4985 0.6703 2,374.863 4 2,374.863
4 0.7681 2,394.065
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 11 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 679

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0301 0.0199 0.2483 7.2000e-
004

0.0894 4.4000e-
004

0.0899 0.0237 4.1000e-
004

0.0241 74.0485 74.0485 1.9500e-
003

1.9800e-
003

74.6885
Total 0.0301 0.0199 0.2483 7.2000e-
004

0.0894 4.4000e-
004

0.0899 0.0237 4.1000e-
004

0.0241 74.0485 74.0485 1.9500e-
003

1.9800e-
003

74.6885
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.6085 0.0000 0.6085 0.0657 0.0000 0.0657 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3027 14.2802 9.7820 0.0245 0.5419 0.5419 0.4985 0.4985 0.0000 2,374.863 4 2,374.863
4 0.7681 2,394.065
4 Total 1.3027 14.2802 9.7820 0.0245 0.6085 0.5419 1.1503 0.0657 0.4985 0.5642 0.0000 2,374.863 4 2,374.863
4 0.7681 2,394.065
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 12 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 680

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0301 0.0199 0.2483 7.2000e-
004

0.0894 4.4000e-
004

0.0899 0.0237 4.1000e-
004

0.0241 74.0485 74.0485 1.9500e-
003

1.9800e-
003

74.6885
Total 0.0301 0.0199 0.2483 7.2000e-
004

0.0894 4.4000e-
004

0.0899 0.0237 4.1000e-
004

0.0241 74.0485 74.0485 1.9500e-
003

1.9800e-
003

74.6885
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Total 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 7.0826 0.6044 7.6869 3.4247 0.5560 3.9807 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 13 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 681

0.1118 5.5000e-
004

0.1123 0.0296 5.1000e-
004

0.0302 92.5606 92.5606 2.4400e-
003

2.4800e-
003

93.3606
Total 0.0377 0.0248 0.3104 9.0000e-
004

0.1118 5.5000e-
004

0.1123 0.0296 5.1000e-
004

0.0302 92.5606 92.5606 2.4400e-
003

2.4800e-
003

93.3606
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.7091 0.0000 2.7091 1.3100 0.0000 1.3100 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 0.0000 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Total 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 2.7091 0.6044 3.3134 1.3100 0.5560 1.8660 0.0000 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 14 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 682

0.1118 5.5000e-
004

0.1123 0.0296 5.1000e-
004

0.0302 92.5606 92.5606 2.4400e-
003

2.4800e-
003

93.3606
Total 0.0377 0.0248 0.3104 9.0000e-
004

0.1118 5.5000e-
004

0.1123 0.0296 5.1000e-
004

0.0302 92.5606 92.5606 2.4400e-
003

2.4800e-
003

93.3606
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 15 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 683

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0251 0.8521 0.3490 4.1300e-
003

0.1474 6.0900e-
003

0.1534 0.0424 5.8200e-
003

0.0483 442.4823 442.4823 0.0114 0.0654 462.2537
Worker 0.4030 0.2655 3.3211 9.6800e-
003

1.1960 5.9100e-
003

1.2019 0.3172 5.4400e-
003

0.3226 990.3981 990.3981 0.0261 0.0265 998.9584
Total 0.4281 1.1176 3.6700 0.0138 1.3434 0.0120 1.3554 0.3596 0.0113 0.3709 1,432.880 4 1,432.880
4 0.0376 0.0919 1,461.212
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 16 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 684

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0251 0.8521 0.3490 4.1300e-
003

0.1474 6.0900e-
003

0.1534 0.0424 5.8200e-
003

0.0483 442.4823 442.4823 0.0114 0.0654 462.2537
Worker 0.4030 0.2655 3.3211 9.6800e-
003

1.1960 5.9100e-
003

1.2019 0.3172 5.4400e-
003

0.3226 990.3981 990.3981 0.0261 0.0265 998.9584
Total 0.4281 1.1176 3.6700 0.0138 1.3434 0.0120 1.3554 0.3596 0.0113 0.3709 1,432.880 4 1,432.880
4 0.0376 0.0919 1,461.212
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Paving 0.3825 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2627 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 17 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 685

0.1677 8.3000e-
004

0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e-
004

0.0452 138.8409 138.8409 3.6600e-
003

3.7200e-
003
140.0409
Total 0.0565 0.0372 0.4656 1.3600e-
003

0.1677 8.3000e-
004

0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e-
004

0.0452 138.8409 138.8409 3.6600e-
003

3.7200e-
003
140.0409
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 0.0000 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Paving 0.3825 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2627 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 0.0000 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 18 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 686

0.1677 8.3000e-
004

0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e-
004

0.0452 138.8409 138.8409 3.6600e-
003

3.7200e-
003
140.0409
Total 0.0565 0.0372 0.4656 1.3600e-
003

0.1677 8.3000e-
004

0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e-
004

0.0452 138.8409 138.8409 3.6600e-
003

3.7200e-
003
140.0409
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 37.6772 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003

0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 19 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 687

0.2347 1.1600e-
003

0.2359 0.0623 1.0700e-
003

0.0633 194.3772 194.3772 5.1300e-
003

5.2100e-
003
196.0573
Total 0.0791 0.0521 0.6518 1.9000e-
003

0.2347 1.1600e-
003

0.2359 0.0623 1.0700e-
003

0.0633 194.3772 194.3772 5.1300e-
003

5.2100e-
003
196.0573
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 37.4856 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003

0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 37.6772 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003

0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 20 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 688

0.2347 1.1600e-
003

0.2359 0.0623 1.0700e-
003

0.0633 194.3772 194.3772 5.1300e-
003

5.2100e-
003
196.0573
Total 0.0791 0.0521 0.6518 1.9000e-
003

0.2347 1.1600e-
003

0.2359 0.0623 1.0700e-
003

0.0633 194.3772 194.3772 5.1300e-
003

5.2100e-
003
196.0573
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 21 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 689
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.2487 2.5654 20.9428 0.0437 4.9654 0.0323 4.9978 1.3206 0.0301 1.3507 4,520.706 4 4,520.706
4 0.2781 0.2014 4,587.683
3 Unmitigated 2.2487 2.5654 20.9428 0.0437 4.9654 0.0323 4.9978 1.3206 0.0301 1.3507 4,520.706 4 4,520.706
4 0.2781 0.2014 4,587.683
3 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.553454 0.057396 0.176797 0.139748 0.026931 0.003318 0.005455 0.008150 0.000259 0.000117 0.025674 0.000446 0.002256 Parking Lot 0.553454 0.057396 0.176797 0.139748 0.026931 0.003318 0.005455 0.008150 0.000259 0.000117 0.025674 0.000446 0.002256 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 22 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 690
Strip Mall 0.553454 0.057396 0.176797 0.139748 0.026931 0.003318 0.005455 0.008150 0.000259 0.000117 0.025674 0.000446 0.002256

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0467 0.3990 0.1711 2.5500e-
003

0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 509.0861 509.0861 9.7600e-
003

9.3300e-
003
512.1114
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0467 0.3990 0.1711 2.5500e-
003

0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 509.0861 509.0861 9.7600e-
003

9.3300e-
003
512.1114

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Percent of Electricity Use Generated with Renewable Energy Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 23 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 691

0.0320 0.0320 0.0320 0.0320 505.2882 505.2882 9.6800e-
003

9.2600e-
003
508.2908
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Strip Mall 32.2827 3.5000e-
004

3.1600e-
003

2.6600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
004

3.7980 3.7980 7.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

3.8205
Total 0.0467 0.3990 0.1711 2.5500e-
003

0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 509.0861 509.0861 9.7500e-
003

9.3300e-
003
512.1114
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 24 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 692

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

4.29495 0.0463 0.3958 0.1684 2.5300e-
003

0.0320 0.0320 0.0320 0.0320 505.2882 505.2882 9.6800e-
003

9.2600e-
003
508.2908
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Strip Mall 0.0322827 3.5000e-
004

3.1600e-
003

2.6600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
004

3.7980 3.7980 7.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

3.8205
Total 0.0467 0.3990 0.1711 2.5500e-
003

0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 0.0322 509.0861 509.0861 9.7500e-
003

9.3300e-
003
512.1114
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 25 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 693
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.9443 1.6406 9.6599 0.0103 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.0000 1,978.228 8 1,978.228
8 0.0532 0.0360 1,990.278
8 Unmitigated 2.9443 1.6406 9.6599 0.0103 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.0000 1,978.228 8 1,978.228
8 0.0532 0.0360 1,990.278
8 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.2054 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

2.2872 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.1799 1.5369 0.6540 9.8100e-
003

0.1243 0.1243 0.1243 0.1243 0.0000 1,962.000
0 1,962.000
0 0.0376 0.0360 1,973.659
2 Landscaping 0.2719 0.1037 9.0059 4.8000e-
004

0.0499 0.0499 0.0499 0.0499 16.2288 16.2288 0.0156 16.6196 Total 2.9443 1.6406 9.6599 0.0103 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.0000 1,978.228 8 1,978.228
8 0.0532 0.0360 1,990.278
8 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 26 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 694

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.2054 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

2.2872 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.1799 1.5369 0.6540 9.8100e-
003

0.1243 0.1243 0.1243 0.1243 0.0000 1,962.000
0 1,962.000
0 0.0376 0.0360 1,973.659
2 Landscaping 0.2719 0.1037 9.0059 4.8000e-
004

0.0499 0.0499 0.0499 0.0499 16.2288 16.2288 0.0156 16.6196 Total 2.9443 1.6406 9.6599 0.0103 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.1741 0.0000 1,978.228 8 1,978.228
8 0.0532 0.0360 1,990.278
8 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:02 PMPage 27 of 28 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 695

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

Appendix B

Annual Emissions Calculations Output
(CalEEMod)

697
414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project
San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - The project proposes to construct and operate 109 multifamily residential homes and 5,356 square feet of ground floor general commercial use on approximately 2.3 acre vacant site.

Construction Phase - Construction phases are adjusted to meet opening year 2023.

Vehicle Trips - Trip Generation rates are based 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project Trip Generation & VMT Study, City of Ontario and ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition.

Woodstoves - SCAQMD Rule 445 restricts wood burning hearths/fireplaces from being installed in new development.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust control.

Area Mitigation -

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 32

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2024Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 1 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 698
Energy Mitigation - The project will be required to instal solar panels capable of meeting the California Energy Code Design Rating for all residential dwellings. (Assumes 80% of demand generated by renewable sources).

Fleet Mix - Operational fleet mix adjusted to equal 2% trucks with GVWR > 10,000 lbs.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 200.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 5.45 0.00
tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 8.1500e-003
tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 8.1500e-003
tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 8.1500e-003
tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.55
tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.55
tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.55
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.06
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.18
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.18
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.18
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.03
tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1040e-003 3.3180e-003
tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1040e-003 3.3180e-003
tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1040e-003 3.3180e-003
tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.03
tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.03
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 2 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 699
tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.03
tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.14
tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.14
tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.14
tblFleetMix MH 4.8300e-003 2.2560e-003
tblFleetMix MH 4.8300e-003 2.2560e-003
tblFleetMix MH 4.8300e-003 2.2560e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 5.4550e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 5.4550e-003
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 5.4550e-003
tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5400e-004 2.5900e-004
tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5400e-004 2.5900e-004
tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5400e-004 2.5900e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 4.4600e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 4.4600e-004
tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 4.4600e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5100e-004 1.1700e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5100e-004 1.1700e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5100e-004 1.1700e-004
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 5,360.00 5,356.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.87 0.72
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 4.55
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 42.04 65.70
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 3.86
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 20.43 65.70
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 2.01
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 44.32 49.10
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 3 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 700

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.6171 1.7659 2.0781 4.5300e-
003

0.2119 0.0751 0.2870 0.0555 0.0717 0.1271 0.0000 395.6156 395.6156 0.0541 0.0105 400.0837 Maximum 0.6171 1.7659 2.0781 4.5300e-
003

0.2119 0.0751 0.2870 0.0555 0.0717 0.1271 0.0000 395.6156 395.6156 0.0541 0.0105 400.0837 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.6171 1.7659 2.0781 4.5300e-
003

0.1679 0.0751 0.2430 0.0445 0.0717 0.1162 0.0000 395.6153 395.6153 0.0541 0.0105 400.0834 Maximum 0.6171 1.7659 2.0781 4.5300e-
003

0.1679 0.0751 0.2430 0.0445 0.0717 0.1162 0.0000 395.6153 395.6153 0.0541 0.0105 400.0834 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.77 0.00 15.34 19.74 0.00 8.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 4 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 701
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-2-2023 4-1-2023 0.5523 0.5523
2 4-2-2023 7-1-2023 0.5474 0.5474
3 7-2-2023 9-30-2023 0.5474 0.5474
Highest 0.5523 0.5523

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.4911 0.0322 1.1339 1.8000e-
004

7.7900e-
003

0.0000 24.0890 24.0890 2.2000e-
003

4.1000e-
004

24.2656
Energy 8.5200e-
003

0.0728 0.0312 4.6000e-
004

5.8800e-
003

0.0000 176.3881 176.3881 9.3900e-
003

2.4900e-
003
177.3641
Mobile 0.2695 0.3130 2.5974 5.2400e-
003

0.5741 3.8300e-
003

0.5780 0.1529 3.5600e-
003

0.1565 0.0000 491.2761 491.2761 0.0306 0.0222 498.6480
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 11.3208 0.0000 11.3208 0.6690 0.0000 28.0468 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.3790 26.6173 28.9964 0.2466 6.0400e- 003

36.9618
Total 0.7692 0.4180 3.7626 5.8800e-
003

0.5741 0.0175 0.5916 0.1529 0.0172 0.1702 13.6998 718.3705 732.0704 0.9579 0.0311 765.2862 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 5 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 702

7.7900e-
003

0.0000 24.0890 24.0890 2.2000e-
003

4.1000e-
004

24.2656
Energy 8.5200e-
003

0.0728 0.0312 4.6000e-
004

5.8800e-
003

0.0000 102.7056 102.7056 3.1700e-
003

1.7300e-
003
103.3014
Mobile 0.2695 0.3130 2.5974 5.2400e-
003

0.5741 3.8300e-
003

0.5780 0.1529 3.5600e-
003

36.9618
Total 0.7692 0.4180 3.7626 5.8800e-
003

0.5741 0.0175 0.5916 0.1529 0.0172 0.1702 13.6998 644.6880 658.3878 0.9516 0.0304 691.2236 Mitigated Operational

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.26 10.06 0.65 2.44 9.68 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 6 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 703
4 Building Construction Building Construction 2/10/2023 11/16/2023 5 200 5 Paving Paving 11/17/2023 11/30/2023 5 10
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/1/2023 12/28/2023 5 20 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Residential Indoor: 220,725; Residential Outdoor: 73,575; Non-Residential Indoor: 8,034; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,678; Striped Parking Area: 3,888 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 6
Acres of Paving: 1.46
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 7 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 704

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Soil Stabilizer
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 440.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 107.00 23.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 21.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 8 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 705

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0477 0.0000 0.0477 7.2200e-
003

0.0000 7.2200e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0147 0.1432 0.1346 2.4000e-
004

6.7700e-
003

6.3300e-
003

0.0000 21.0866 21.0866 5.3500e-
003

0.0000 21.2202
Total 0.0147 0.1432 0.1346 2.4000e-
004

0.0477 6.7700e-
003

0.0544 7.2200e-
003

6.3300e-
003

0.0136 0.0000 21.0866 21.0866 5.3500e-
003

0.0000 21.2202
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 5.1000e-
004

0.0256 7.4200e-
003

1.2000e-
004

3.7900e-
003

2.5000e-
004

4.0400e-
003

1.0400e-
003

2.4000e-
004

1.2800e-
003

0.0000 12.2255 12.2255 5.2000e-
004

1.9400e-
003

12.8160
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.5000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

4.2300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4300e-
003

3.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.1133 1.1133 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

1.1230
Total 9.6000e-
004

0.0259 0.0117 1.3000e-
004

5.2200e-
003

2.6000e-
004

5.4700e-
003

1.4200e-
003

2.5000e-
004

1.6700e-
003

0.0000 13.3388 13.3388 5.5000e-
004

1.9700e-
003

13.9390
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 9 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 706

0.0000 2.7600e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0147 0.1432 0.1346 2.4000e-
004

6.7700e-
003

6.3300e-
003

0.0000 21.0865 21.0865 5.3500e-
003

0.0000 21.2202
Total 0.0147 0.1432 0.1346 2.4000e-
004

0.0182 6.7700e-
003

0.0250 2.7600e-
003

6.3300e-
003

9.0900e-
003

0.0000 21.0865 21.0865 5.3500e-
003

0.0000 21.2202
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 5.1000e-
004

0.0256 7.4200e-
003

1.2000e-
004

3.7900e-
003

2.5000e-
004

4.0400e-
003

1.0400e-
003

2.4000e-
004

1.2800e-
003

0.0000 12.2255 12.2255 5.2000e-
004

1.9400e-
003

12.8160
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.5000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

4.2300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4300e-
003

3.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.1133 1.1133 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

1.1230
Total 9.6000e-
004

0.0259 0.0117 1.3000e-
004

5.2200e-
003

2.6000e-
004

5.4700e-
003

1.4200e-
003

2.5000e-
004

1.6700e-
003

0.0000 13.3388 13.3388 5.5000e-
004

1.9700e-
003

13.9390
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 10 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 707

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 2.3900e-
003

0.0000 2.3900e-
003

2.6000e-
004

0.0000 2.6000e-
004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.9500e-
003

0.0214 0.0147 4.0000e-
005

8.1000e-
004

7.5000e-
004

0.0000 3.2317 3.2317 1.0500e-
003

0.0000 3.2578
Total 1.9500e-
003

0.0214 0.0147 4.0000e-
005

2.3900e-
003

8.1000e-
004

3.2000e-
003

2.6000e-
004

7.5000e-
004

1.0100e-
003

0.0000 3.2317 3.2317 1.0500e-
003

0.0000 3.2578
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.3000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1028 0.1028 0.0000 0.0000 0.1037
Total 4.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.3000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1028 0.1028 0.0000 0.0000 0.1037
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 11 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 708

0.0000 9.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

0.0000 1.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.9500e-
003

0.0214 0.0147 4.0000e-
005

8.1000e-
004

7.5000e-
004

0.0000 3.2317 3.2317 1.0500e-
003

0.0000 3.2578
Total 1.9500e-
003

0.0214 0.0147 4.0000e-
005

9.1000e-
004

8.1000e-
004

1.7200e-
003

1.0000e-
004

7.5000e-
004

8.5000e-
004

0.0000 3.2317 3.2317 1.0500e-
003

0.0000 3.2578
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.3000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1028 0.1028 0.0000 0.0000 0.1037
Total 4.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.3000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1028 0.1028 0.0000 0.0000 0.1037
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 12 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 709

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0213 0.0000 0.0213 0.0103 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.0000e-
003

0.0434 0.0261 6.0000e-
005

1.8100e-
003

1.6700e-
003

0.0000 5.4312 5.4312 1.7600e-
003

0.0000 5.4751
Total 4.0000e-
003

0.0434 0.0261 6.0000e-
005

0.0213 1.8100e-
003

0.0231 0.0103 1.6700e-
003

0.0119 0.0000 5.4312 5.4312 1.7600e-
003

0.0000 5.4751
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

9.8000e-
004

0.0000 3.3000e-
004

9.0000e-
005

0.0000 9.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2569 0.2569 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.2592
Total 1.0000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

9.8000e-
004

0.0000 3.3000e-
004

9.0000e-
005

0.0000 9.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2569 0.2569 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.2592
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 13 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 710

0.0000 8.1300e-
003

3.9300e-
003

0.0000 3.9300e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 4.0000e-
003

0.0434 0.0261 6.0000e-
005

1.8100e-
003

1.6700e-
003

0.0000 5.4312 5.4312 1.7600e-
003

0.0000 5.4751
Total 4.0000e-
003

0.0434 0.0261 6.0000e-
005

8.1300e-
003

1.8100e-
003

9.9400e-
003

3.9300e-
003

1.6700e-
003

5.6000e-
003

0.0000 5.4312 5.4312 1.7600e-
003

0.0000 5.4751
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

9.8000e-
004

0.0000 3.3000e-
004

9.0000e-
005

0.0000 9.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2569 0.2569 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.2592
Total 1.0000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

9.8000e-
004

0.0000 3.3000e-
004

9.0000e-
005

0.0000 9.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2569 0.2569 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.2592
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 14 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 711

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1714 1.3624 1.4215 2.5000e-
003

0.0614 0.0614 0.0588 0.0588 0.0000 207.7021 207.7021 0.0393 0.0000 208.6841 Total 0.1714 1.3624 1.4215 2.5000e-
003

0.0614 0.0614 0.0588 0.0588 0.0000 207.7021 207.7021 0.0393 0.0000 208.6841 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.5900e-
003

0.0849 0.0344 4.1000e-
004

0.0145 6.1000e-
004

0.0151 4.1900e-
003

5.8000e-
004

4.7700e-
003

0.0000 40.0851 40.0851 1.0400e-
003

5.9200e-
003

41.8765
Worker 0.0373 0.0278 0.3482 9.9000e-
004

0.1173 5.9000e-
004

0.1179 0.0312 5.4000e-
004

0.0317 0.0000 91.6304 91.6304 2.4100e-
003

2.4900e-
003

92.4314
Total 0.0399 0.1127 0.3825 1.4000e-
003

0.1318 1.2000e-
003

0.1330 0.0354 1.1200e-
003

0.0365 0.0000 131.7155 131.7155 3.4500e-
003

8.4100e-
003
134.3079
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 15 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 712

0.0614 0.0614 0.0588 0.0588 0.0000 207.7018 207.7018 0.0393 0.0000 208.6838 Total 0.1714 1.3624 1.4214 2.5000e-
003

0.0614 0.0614 0.0588 0.0588 0.0000 207.7018 207.7018 0.0393 0.0000 208.6838 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.5900e-
003

0.0849 0.0344 4.1000e-
004

0.0145 6.1000e-
004

0.0151 4.1900e-
003

5.8000e-
004

4.7700e-
003

0.0000 40.0851 40.0851 1.0400e-
003

5.9200e-
003

41.8765
Worker 0.0373 0.0278 0.3482 9.9000e-
004

0.1173 5.9000e-
004

0.1179 0.0312 5.4000e-
004

0.0317 0.0000 91.6304 91.6304 2.4100e-
003

2.4900e-
003

92.4314
Total 0.0399 0.1127 0.3825 1.4000e-
003

0.1318 1.2000e-
003

0.1330 0.0354 1.1200e-
003

0.0365 0.0000 131.7155 131.7155 3.4500e-
003

8.4100e-
003
134.3079
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 16 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 713

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 4.4000e-
003

0.0431 0.0584 9.0000e-
005

2.1700e-
003

2.0000e-
003

0.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e-
003

0.0000 7.8179
Paving 1.9100e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.3100e-
003

0.0431 0.0584 9.0000e-
005

2.1700e-
003

2.0000e-
003

0.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e-
003

0.0000 7.8179
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.6000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

2.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

8.2000e-
004

0.0000 8.3000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

0.0000 2.2000e-
004

0.0000 0.6423 0.6423 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.6479
Total 2.6000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

2.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

8.2000e-
004

0.0000 8.3000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

0.0000 2.2000e-
004

0.0000 0.6423 0.6423 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.6479
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 17 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 714

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 4.4000e-
003

0.0431 0.0584 9.0000e-
005

2.1700e-
003

2.0000e-
003

0.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e-
003

0.0000 7.8178
Paving 1.9100e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.3100e-
003

0.0431 0.0584 9.0000e-
005

2.1700e-
003

2.0000e-
003

0.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e-
003

0.0000 7.8178
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.6000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

2.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

8.2000e-
004

0.0000 8.3000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

0.0000 2.2000e-
004

0.0000 0.6423 0.6423 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.6479
Total 2.6000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

2.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

8.2000e-
004

0.0000 8.3000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

0.0000 2.2000e-
004

0.0000 0.6423 0.6423 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.6479
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 18 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 715

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.3749 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9200e-
003

0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e-
005

7.1000e-
004

0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e-
004

0.0000 2.5571
Total 0.3768 0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e-
005

7.1000e-
004

0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e-
004

0.0000 2.5571
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.3000e-
004

5.5000e-
004

6.8300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.3000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.3100e-
003

6.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000 1.7984 1.7984 5.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.8141
Total 7.3000e-
004

5.5000e-
004

6.8300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.3000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.3100e-
003

6.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000 1.7984 1.7984 5.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.8141
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 19 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 716

0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e-
005

7.1000e-
004

0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e-
004

0.0000 2.5571
Total 0.3768 0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e-
005

7.1000e-
004

0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e-
004

0.0000 2.5571
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.3000e-
004

5.5000e-
004

6.8300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.3000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.3100e-
003

6.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000 1.7984 1.7984 5.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.8141
Total 7.3000e-
004

5.5000e-
004

6.8300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.3000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.3100e-
003

6.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000 1.7984 1.7984 5.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.8141
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 20 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 717

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.2695 0.3130 2.5974 5.2400e-
003

0.5741 3.8300e-
003

0.5780 0.1529 3.5600e-
003

0.1565 0.0000 491.2761 491.2761 0.0306 0.0222 498.6480
Unmitigated 0.2695 0.3130 2.5974 5.2400e-
003

0.5741 3.8300e-
003

0.5780 0.1529 3.5600e-
003

0.1565 0.0000 491.2761 491.2761 0.0306 0.0222 498.6480

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 219.09 495.95 420.74 982,255 982,255 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Strip Mall 263.18 352.15 352.15 549,085 549,085
Total 482.27 848.10 772.89 1,531,340 1,531,340
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Strip Mall 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.60 64.40 19.00 45 40 15
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 21 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 718

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 18.4206 18.4206 1.5500e- 003

1.9000e-
004

18.5157
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 92.1032 92.1032 7.7700e- 003

9.4000e-
004

92.5783
NaturalGas
Mitigated

8.5200e-
003

0.0728 0.0312 4.6000e-
004

5.8800e-
003

0.0000 84.2849 84.2849 1.6200e-
003

1.5500e-
003

84.7858
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

8.5200e-
003

0.0728 0.0312 4.6000e-
004

5.8800e-
003

0.0000 84.2849 84.2849 1.6200e-
003

1.5500e-
003

84.7858

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Percent of Electricity Use Generated with Renewable Energy Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 22 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 719

1.56766e
+006

8.4500e-
003

0.0722 0.0307 4.6000e-
004

5.8400e-
003

0.0000 83.6561 83.6561 1.6000e-
003

1.5300e-
003

84.1533
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Strip Mall 11783.2 6.0000e-
005

5.8000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.6288 0.6288 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.6325
Total 8.5100e-
003

0.0728 0.0312 4.6000e-
004

5.8800e-
003

0.0000 84.2849 84.2849 1.6100e-
003

1.5400e-
003

84.7858
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 23 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 720

1.56766e
+006

8.4500e-
003

0.0722 0.0307 4.6000e-
004

5.8400e-
003

0.0000 83.6561 83.6561 1.6000e-
003

1.5300e-
003

84.1533
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Strip Mall 11783.2 6.0000e-
005

5.8000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.6288 0.6288 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.6325
Total 8.5100e-
003

0.0728 0.0312 4.6000e-
004

5.8800e-
003

0.0000 84.2849 84.2849 1.6100e-
003

1.5400e-
003

84.7858
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 24 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 721

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
431641 76.5496 6.4600e-
003

7.8000e-
004

76.9445
Parking Lot 22680 4.0222 3.4000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

4.0430
Strip Mall 65021.8 11.5313 9.7000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

11.5908
Total 92.1032 7.7700e-
003

9.4000e-
004

92.5783
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 25 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 722

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
86328.2 15.3099 1.2900e-
003

1.6000e-
004

15.3889
Parking Lot 4536 0.8044 7.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.8086
Strip Mall 13004.4 2.3063 1.9000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

2.3182
Total 18.4206 1.5500e-
003

1.9000e-
004

18.5157
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 26 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 723
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.4911 0.0322 1.1339 1.8000e-
004

7.7900e-
003

0.0000 24.0890 24.0890 2.2000e-
003

4.1000e-
004

24.2656
Unmitigated 0.4911 0.0322 1.1339 1.8000e-
004

7.7900e-
003

0.0000 24.0890 24.0890 2.2000e-
003

4.1000e-
004

24.2656

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0375 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.4174 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 2.2500e-
003

0.0192 8.1800e-
003

1.2000e-
004

1.5500e-
003

0.0000 22.2487 22.2487 4.3000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

22.3809
Landscaping 0.0340 0.0130 1.1257 6.0000e-
005

6.2400e-
003

0.0000 1.8403 1.8403 1.7700e-
003

0.0000 1.8846
Total 0.4911 0.0322 1.1339 1.8000e-
004

7.7900e-
003

0.0000 24.0890 24.0890 2.2000e-
003

4.1000e-
004

24.2656
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 27 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 724

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0375 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.4174 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 2.2500e-
003

0.0192 8.1800e-
003

1.2000e-
004

1.5500e-
003

0.0000 22.2487 22.2487 4.3000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

22.3809
Landscaping 0.0340 0.0130 1.1257 6.0000e-
005

6.2400e-
003

0.0000 1.8403 1.8403 1.7700e-
003

0.0000 1.8846
Total 0.4911 0.0322 1.1339 1.8000e-
004

7.7900e-
003

0.0000 24.0890 24.0890 2.2000e-
003

4.1000e-
004

24.2656
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 28 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 725
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 28.9964 0.2466 6.0400e-
003

36.9618
Unmitigated 28.9964 0.2466 6.0400e-
003

36.9618

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

7.10179 /

4.47721

27.4741 0.2335 5.7200e-
003

35.0179
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Strip Mall 0.397029 /

0.24334

1.5222 0.0131 3.2000e-
004

1.9439
Total 28.9964 0.2466 6.0400e-
003

36.9618
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 29 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 726

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

7.10179 /

4.47721

27.4741 0.2335 5.7200e-
003

35.0179
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Strip Mall 0.397029 /

0.24334

1.5222 0.0131 3.2000e-
004

1.9439
Total 28.9964 0.2466 6.0400e-
003

36.9618
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 30 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 727
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 11.3208 0.6690 0.0000 28.0468
Unmitigated 11.3208 0.6690 0.0000 28.0468
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

50.14 10.1780 0.6015 0.0000 25.2155
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Strip Mall 5.63 1.1428 0.0675 0.0000 2.8313
Total 11.3208 0.6690 0.0000 28.0468
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 31 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 728

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

50.14 10.1780 0.6015 0.0000 25.2155
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Strip Mall 5.63 1.1428 0.0675 0.0000 2.8313
Total 11.3208 0.6690 0.0000 28.0468
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/15/2022 12:01 PMPage 33 of 33 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 730

Appendix C

Ontario Community Climate Action Plan Screening Tables

731

CEQA THRESHOLDS AND SCREENING TABLES
Instructions for Residential, Commercial, or
Industrial Projects
The Screening Table assigns points for each option incorporated into a project as mitigation or a project design feature (collectively referred to as "feature"). The point values correspond to the minimum emissions reduction expected from each feature. The menu of features allows maximum flexibility and options for how development projects can implement the GHG reduction measures. The point levels are based upon improvements compared to 2008 emission levels of efficiency. Projects that garner at least 100 points will be consistent with the reduction quantities anticipated in the City's CAP. As such, those projects that garner a total of 100 points or greater would not require quantification of project specific GHG emissions. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines, such projects would be determined to have a less than significant individual and cumulative impact for GHG emissions.

Instructions for Mixed Use Projects
Mixed use projects provide additional opportunities to reduce emissions by combining complimentary land uses in a manner that can reduce vehicle trips. Mixed use projects also have the potential to complement energy efficient infrastructure in a way that reduces emissions. For mixed use projects, fill out both Screening Table 1 and Table 2, but proportion the points identical to the proportioning of the mix of uses. As an example, a mixed use project that is 50% commercial uses and 50% residential uses will show Y, point for each assigned point value in Table 1 and Table 2. Add the points from both tables.

Mixed use Projects that garner at least 100 points will be consistent with the reduction quantities in the City's CAP and are considered less than significant for GHG emissions.

Those projects that do not garnish 100 points using the screening tables will need to provide additional analysis to determine the significance of GHG emissions. Nothing in this guidance shall be construed as limiting the City's authority to adopt a statement of overriding consideration for projects with significant GHG impacts. The following tables provides a menu of performance standards/options related to GHG mitigation measures and design features that can be used to demonstrate consistency with the reduction measures and GHG reduction quantities in the CAP.

GREENHOUSEGAS EMISSIONS
•
November 2014
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
w
:)
z
0 :; 0
414 & 440 EUCLID MIXED USE PROJECT

OBSERVED PARKING STUDY
City of Ontario, California

EAST D STREET
-------rnn engine�ringgroup, me.

Attachment A-3
746

November 8, 2022

Mr. George Voight

ONTARIO PLACE D BLOCK, LLC
119 E St. Joseph Street
Arcadia, CA 91006

Subject: 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project Observed Parking Study, City of Ontario, CA
Dear Mr. Voight:

A. Introduction
RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) is pleased to provide this observed parking study for the proposed 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue Mixed Use Project. The project site is approximately

2.3 acres and is located at 414 & 440 Euclid Avenue , in the City of Ontario, and is within a half mile walking distance to the Ontario Ra il Station (served by Amtrak) located at 198 E.

Emporia Street, Ontario, CA 91764.

The project site is located within the LUA-1 (E uclid Avenue Entertainment) district of the MU-1 (Downtown Mixed Use) zoning district, which requires City Council adoption of planned Unit Development (PUD). PUD-22-005 was submitted to establish the land use designations and development standards and guidelines governing the development of the proposed project. As such, this study ut ilizes PUD-22-005 to determine the parking requirements for the proposed project.

The project site is currently occupied with a mix of commercial land uses. The project consists of displacing the existing commerci al land uses with 10 9 4-story multi-family residential dwelling units and 5,356 square feet of ground floor general commercial use.

The site will provide a total of 162 parking spaces on-site. However, based on Section 11.0 of the Land Development Division Project Review Comments , dated August 1, 2022, the project has a parking deficiency of 38 parking spaces. The Land Development Division Project Review Comments is provided in Appendix A.
747

ONTARIO PLACE D BLOCK, LLC
RK17633.3

Page 2 ends

Ontario City CouncilMay 16, 2023

Ontario City Council
May 16, 2023