Agenda packet — Ontario City Council, October 7, 2025 (part 2 of 2)

6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Zydus Settlement Agreement, this CA Zydus Allocation Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating
296
8 Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Zydus Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. d) Except as provided in the Zydus Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California. 297
9 The undersigned, Ontario city, CA, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California State- Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds –Zydus Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Zydus Settlement and ACCEPTS this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Zydus Settlement.

Signature: /signer_1_som/
Name: /name_1_som/
Title: /title_1_som/
Date: /date_1_som/
298
APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights, releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds—Zydus Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change.

Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change. Regarding the column herein entitled “Abatement Percentage,” pursuant to Section 4.B.e., the State of California will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision. Regarding the column herein entitled “Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,” payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not an Initial Participating Subdivision, will be re-allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. Regarding the column herein entitled “Abatement Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the California Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.B. Regarding the column herein entitled “Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.C.

Regarding the column herein entitled “Weighted Allocation Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage. 299
APPENDIX 1
1of15
100.000% 100.000% 100.000%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Alameda County Alameda 2.332% 2.853% 2
.4237952%
City Alameda Alameda 0.069% 0
.0570162%
City Albany Alameda 0.013% 0
.0107768%
City Berkeley Alameda 0.152% 0
.1249656%
City Dublin Alameda 0.033% 0.040% 0
.0338810%
City Emeryville Alameda 0.023% 0
.0185765%
City Fremont Alameda 0.108% 0
.0888576%
City Hayward Alameda 0.117% 0
.0966218%
City Livermore Alameda 0.054% 0
.0446740%
City Newark Alameda 0.026% 0
.0217626%
City Oakland Alameda 0.486% 0.595% 0
.5055601%
City Piedmont Alameda 0.014% 0
.0114064%
City Pleasanton Alameda 0.067% 0
.0554547%
City San Leandro Alameda 0.039% 0
.0321267%
City Union City Alameda 0.043% 0
.0352484%
County Amador County Amador 0.226% 0.277% 0
.2349885%
County Butte County Butte 1.615% 1.975% 1
.6783178%
City Chico Butte 0.216% 0.264% 0
.2246499%
City Oroville Butte 0.079% 0
.0646595%
County Calaveras County Calaveras 0.226% 0.277% 0
.2351644%
County Colusa County Colusa 0.059% 0
.0489221%
County Contra Costa County Contra Costa 2.102% 2.571% 2 .1844585%
City Antioch Contra Costa 0.037% 0
.0301879%
City Brentwood Contra Costa 0.026% 0
.0215339%
City Clayton Contra Costa 0.002% 0
.0018060%
City Concord Contra Costa 0.055% 0
.0456676%
City Danville Contra Costa 0.010% 0
.0082255%
City El Cerrito Contra Costa 0.023% 0
.0189024%
City Hercules Contra Costa 0.010% 0
.0078273%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Lafayette Contra Costa 0.006% 0
.0046030%
300
APPENDIX 1
2of15
City Martinez Contra Costa 0.012% 0
.0098593%
City Moraga Contra Costa 0.004% 0
.0031007%
City Oakley Contra Costa 0.010% 0
.0079416%
City Orinda Contra Costa 0.005% 0
.0038157%
City Pinole Contra Costa 0.013% 0
.0110909%
City Pittsburg Contra Costa 0.053% 0
.0436369%
City Pleasant Hill Contra Costa 0.013% 0
.0106309%
City Richmond Contra Costa 0.146% 0
.1201444%
City San Pablo Contra Costa 0.018% 0
.0148843%
City San Ramon Contra Costa 0.021% 0
.0176459%
City Walnut Creek Contra Costa 0.026% 0
.0212132%
County Del Norte County Del Norte 0.114% 0.140% 0
.1189608%
County El Dorado County El Dorado 0.768% 0.939% 0
.7980034%
City Placerville El Dorado 0.015% 0
.0127642%
City South Lake Tahoe El Dorado 0.081% 0
.0665456%
County Fresno County Fresno 1.895% 2.318% 1
.9693410%
City Clovis Fresno 0.065% 0
.0536211%
City Coalinga Fresno 0.012% 0
.0098554%
City Fresno Fresno 0.397% 0
.3270605%
City Kerman Fresno 0.005% 0
.0042534%
City Kingsburg Fresno 0.008% 0
.0066167%
City Mendota Fresno 0.002% 0
.0019387%
City Orange Cove Fresno 0.004% 0
.0035607%
City Parlier Fresno 0.008% 0
.0069755%
City Reedley Fresno 0.012% 0
.0098804%
City Sanger Fresno 0.018% 0
.0146135%
City Selma Fresno 0.015% 0
.0127537%
County Glenn County Glenn 0.107% 0.131% 0
.1116978%
County Humboldt County Humboldt 1.030% 1.260% 1
.0703185%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Arcata Humboldt 0.054% 0
.0447660%
City Eureka Humboldt 0.117% 0.143% 0
.1216284%
City Fortuna Humboldt 0.032% 0
.0266837%
County Imperial County Imperial 0.258% 0.315% 0
.2679006%
City Brawley Imperial 0.011% 0
.0087986%
301
APPENDIX 1
3of15
City Calexico Imperial 0.019% 0
.0152799%
City El Centro Imperial 0.158% 0
.1302522%
City Imperial Imperial 0.006% 0
.0048791%
County Inyo County Inyo 0.073% 0.089% 0
.0754413%
County Kern County K
ern 2.517% 3.079% 2
.6159145%
City Arvin Kern 0.006% 0
.0046425%
City Bakersfield Kern 0.212% 0
.1747198%
City California City Kern 0.009% 0
.0070820%
City Delano K
ern 0.030% 0
.0249316%
City McFarland Kern 0.003% 0
.0025644%
City Ridgecrest Kern 0.015% 0
.0120938%
City Shafter Kern 0.013% 0
.0103417%
City Tehachapi Kern 0.009% 0
.0073580%
City Wasco Kern 0.008% 0
.0069861%
County Kings County Kings 0.293% 0
.2413469%
City Avenal Kings 0.007% 0
.0056335%
City Corcoran Kings 0.013% 0
.0107032%
City Hanford Kings 0.027% 0
.0226038%
City Lemoore Kings 0.016% 0
.0131900%
County Lake County Lake 0.795% 0
.6545389%
City Clearlake Lake 0.041% 0.050% 0
.0426253%
City Lakeport Lake 0.021% 0.026% 0
.0222964%
County Lassen County Lassen 0.319% 0.391% 0
.3320610%
City Susanville Lassen 0.027% 0
.0219295%
County Los Angeles County Los Angeles 13.896% 16.999% 1

4.4437559%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Agoura Hills Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040024%
City Alhambra Los Angeles 0.042% 0.0343309%
City Arcadia Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0267718%
City Artesia Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0005100%
City Azusa Los Angeles 0.026% 0.0210857%
City Baldwin Park Los Angeles 0.027% 0.0218520%
City Bell Los Angeles 0.008% 0.0068783%
City Bellflower Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0014485%
City Bell Gardens Los Angeles 0.014% 0.0114301%
302
APPENDIX 1
4of15
City Beverly Hills Los Angeles 0.065% 0.0534897%
City Burbank Los Angeles 0.100% 0.0823132%
City Calabasas Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048948%
City Carson Los Angeles 0
.019% 0.0159805%
City Cerritos Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039682%
City Claremont Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0082584%
City Commerce Los Angeles 0.000% 0.0002971%
City Compton Los Angeles 0.044% 0.0361882%
City Covina Los Angeles 0.028% 0.0229127%
City Cudahy Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006020%
City Culver City Los Angeles 0.055% 0.0449894%
City Diamond Bar Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006993%
City Downey Los Angeles 0.052% 0.0429994%
City Duarte Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0027261%
City El Monte Los Angeles 0.031% 0.038% 0.0318985%
City El Segundo Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0268020%
City Gardena Los Angeles 0.034% 0.0278088%
City Glendale Los Angeles 0.166% 0.1366586%
City Glendora Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134411%
City Hawaiian Gardens Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040549%
City Hawthorne Los Angeles 0.050% 0.0407833%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Hermosa Beach Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0145307%
City Huntington Park Los Angeles 0.023% 0.0190667%
City Inglewood Los Angeles 0.059% 0.0489195%
City La Canada Flintridge Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0025565% City Lakewood Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039971%
City La Mirada Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0081572%
City Lancaster Los Angeles 0.045% 0.0369689%
City La Puente Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012999%
City La Verne Los Angeles 0.024% 0.0194190%
City Lawndale Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0017731%
City Lomita Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0031940%
City Long Beach Los Angeles 0.439% 0.3614151%
City Los Angeles Los Angeles 2.715% 3.321% 2.8218811 %
303
APPENDIX 1
5of15
City Lynwood Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134345%
City Malibu Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0019269%
City Manhattan Beach Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260686%
City Maywood Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0035528%
City Monrovia Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0254455%
City Montebello Los Angeles 0.030% 0.0250670%
City Monterey Park Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0256677%
City Norwalk Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0258228%
City Palmdale Los Angeles 0.046% 0.0375827%
City Palos Verdes Estates Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0053102% City Paramount Los Angeles 0.011% 0.0091483%
City Pasadena Los Angeles 0.146% 0.1200524%
City Pico Rivera Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0183333%
City Pomona Los Angeles 0.111% 0.0911933%
City Rancho Palos Verdes Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012645%
City Redondo Beach Los Angeles 0.062% 0.0506992%
City Rosemead Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0028260%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City San Dimas Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0022016%
City San Fernando Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0104837%
City San Gabriel Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0147726%
City San Marino Los Angeles 0.009% 0.0073791%
City Santa Clarita Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0178167%
City Santa Fe Springs Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0257531%
City Santa Monica Los Angeles 0.158% 0.1298513%
City Sierra Madre Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048646%
City Signal Hill Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0084884%
City South El Monte Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039603%
City South Gate Los Angeles 0.020% 0.0166272%
City South Pasadena Los Angeles 0.012% 0.0095334%
City Temple City Los Angeles 0
.005% 0.0039498%
City Torrance Los Angeles 0.112% 0.0919820%
City Walnut Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0047305%
City West Covina Los Angeles 0.049% 0.0404521%
City West Hollywood Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0108517%
304
APPENDIX 1
6of15
City Whittier Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260581%
County Madera County M
adera 0.349% 0.427% 0.3630669%
City Chowchilla Madera 0.012% 0.0097332%
City Madera Madera 0.039% 0.0318441%
County Marin County M
arin 0.564% 0.690% 0.5861325%
City Larkspur Marin 0.015% 0.0124697%
City Mill Valley Marin 0.020% 0.0168401%
City Novato Marin 0.028% 0.0229824%
City San Anselmo Marin 0.009% 0.0078062%
City San Rafael Marin 0.089% 0.0729823%
County Mariposa County M
ariposa 0.084% 0.103% 0.0876131%
County Mendocino County M
endocino 0.439% 0.536% 0.4558394%
City Ukiah Mendocino 0.039% 0.0317153%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Merced County Merced 0.551% 0.674% 0
.5724262%
City Atwater Merced 0.024% 0
.0195846%
City Livingston Merced 0.006% 0
.0045873%
City Los Banos Merced 0.020% 0
.0165142%
City Merced Merced 0.061% 0
.0500762%
County Modoc County Modoc 0.065% 0.080% 0
.0678250%
County Mono County Mono 0.023% 0.029% 0
.0242606%
County Monterey County Monterey 0.908% 1.111% 0
.9437083%
City Greenfield Monterey 0.006% 0
.0050552%
City King City Monterey 0.005% 0
.0037355%
City Marina Monterey 0.017% 0
.0144098%
City Monterey Monterey 0.041% 0
.0336540%
City Pacific Grove Monterey 0.009% 0
.0074842%
City Salinas Monterey 0.094% 0
.0776576%
City Seaside Monterey 0.023% 0
.0191772%
City Soledad Monterey 0.007% 0
.0060870%
County Napa County Napa 0.288% 0.352% 0
.2994325%
City American Canyon Napa 0.017% 0
.0136869%
City Napa Napa 0.078% 0
.0642783%
County Nevada County Nevada 0.441% 0.539% 0
.4579827%
City Grass Valley Nevada 0.024% 0
.0197805%
305
APPENDIX 1
7of15
City Truckee Nevada 0.003% 0
.0023843%
County Orange County Orange 4.364% 5.339% 4
.5363576%
City Aliso Viejo Orange 0.014% 0
.0113841%
City Anaheim Orange 0.554% 0.678% 0
.5759282%
City Brea Orange 0.086% 0
.0708897%
City Buena Park Orange 0.087% 0
.0714352%
City Costa Mesa Orange 0.124% 0.152% 0
.1288366%
City Cypress Orange 0.033% 0
.0271937%
City Dana Point Orange 0.001% 0
.0005560%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Fountain Valley Orange 0.055% 0
.0455980%
City Fullerton Orange 0.137% 0.168% 0
.1425744%
City Garden Grove Orange 0.213% 0
.1752482%
City Huntington Beach Orange 0.247% 0.302% 0
.2568420%
City Irvine Orange 0.139% 0.170% 0
.1442350%
City Laguna Beach Orange 0.047% 0.058% 0
.0493043%
City Laguna Hills Orange 0.014% 0
.0115457%
City Laguna Niguel Orange 0.001% 0
.0007071%
City Laguna Woods Orange 0.001% 0
.0006546%
City La Habra Orange 0.060% 0.073% 0
.0621049%
City Lake Forest Orange 0.012% 0
.0101249%
City La Palma Orange 0.012% 0
.0095439%
City Los Alamitos Orange 0.008% 0
.0069190%
City Mission Viejo Orange 0.014% 0
.0117560%
City Newport Beach Orange 0.179% 0
.1470134%
City Orange Orange 0.150% 0
.1231320%
City Placentia Orange 0.029% 0.035% 0
.0298912%
City Rancho Santa Margarita Orange 0.001% 0
.0006296%
City San Clemente Orange 0.008% 0.010% 0
.0086083%
City San Juan Capistrano Orange 0.008% 0
.0065510%
City Santa Ana Orange 0.502% 0.614% 0
.5213866%
City Seal Beach Orange 0.020% 0
.0165891%
City Stanton Orange 0.035% 0
.0291955%
City Tustin Orange 0.073% 0
.0600341%
City Westminster Orange 0.104% 0.127% 0
.1082721%
306
APPENDIX 1
8of15
City Yorba Linda Orange 0.044% 0
.0362223%
County Placer County Placer 1.045% 1.278% 1
.0861002%
City Auburn Placer 0.017% 0
.0141114%
City Lincoln Placer 0.031% 0
.0255599%
City Rocklin Placer 0.076% 0
.0625485%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Roseville Placer 0.196% 0.1616559%
County Plumas County P
lumas 0.205% 0.251% 0.2128729%
County Riverside County R
iverside 4.534% 5.547% 4.7128296%
City Banning Riverside 0.017% 0.0143848%
City Beaumont Riverside 0.021% 0.0171135%
City Blythe Riverside 0.012% 0.0096714%
City Canyon Lake Riverside 0.000% 0.0001761%
City Cathedral City Riverside 0.067% 0.0553614%
City Coachella Riverside 0.021% 0.0173054%
City Corona Riverside 0.147% 0.1207083%
City Desert Hot Springs Riverside 0.024% 0.0200433%
City Eastvale Riverside 0.000% 0.0002747%
City Hemet Riverside 0.051% 0.0421792%
City Indio Riverside 0.056% 0.0457794%
City Jurupa Valley Riverside 0.001% 0.0008991%
City Lake Elsinore Riverside 0.021% 0.0172949%
City La Quinta Riverside 0.063% 0.0516732%
City Menifee Riverside 0.032% 0.0260909%
City Moreno Valley Riverside 0.137% 0.1130348%
City Murrieta Riverside 0.048% 0.059% 0.0497423%
City Norco Riverside 0.016% 0.0134542%
City Palm Desert Riverside 0.083% 0.0682465%
City Palm Springs Riverside 0.076% 0.0629862%
City Perris Riverside 0.009% 0.0076774%
City Rancho Mirage Riverside 0.052% 0.0431098%
City Riverside Riverside 0.268% 0.2206279%
City San Jacinto Riverside 0.010% 0.0085936%
City Temecula Riverside 0.022% 0.0180086%
City Wildomar Riverside 0.008% 0.0062500%
307
APPENDIX 1
9of15
County Sacramento County S
acramento 3.797% 4.645% 3.9465887%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Citrus Heights Sacramento 0.057% 0.0465312%
City Elk Grove Sacramento 0.130% 0.1066994%
City Folsom Sacramento 0.108% 0.0890850%
City Galt Sacramento 0.017% 0.0143704%
City Rancho Cordova Sacramento 0.008% 0.0067679%
City Sacramento Sacramento 0.721% 0.882% 0.7496530%
County San Benito County San Benito 0.106% 0.130% 0.1101417% City Hollister San Benito 0.027% 0.0225355%
County San Bernardino County San Bernardino 3.259% 3.987% 3.3878124% City Adelanto San Bernardino 0.008% 0.0066640%
City Apple Valley San Bernardino 0.025% 0.0207360%
City Barstow San Bernardino 0.015% 0.0122056%
City Chino San Bernardino 0.064% 0.0525893%
City Chino Hills San Bernardino 0.001% 0.0006388%
City Colton San Bernardino 0.031% 0.0253443%
City Fontana San Bernardino 0.112% 0.0920543%
City Grand Terrace San Bernardino 0.006% 0.0051051%
City Hesperia San Bernardino 0.035% 0.0291522%
City Highland San Bernardino 0.004% 0.0029061%
City Loma Linda San Bernardino 0.009% 0.0071188%
City Montclair San Bernardino 0.039% 0.0322108%
City Ontario San Bernardino 0.179% 0.1472934%
City Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino 0.084% 0.0689431%
City Redlands San Bernardino 0.057% 0.0469150%
City Rialto San Bernardino 0.073% 0.0603206%
City San Bernardino San Bernardino 0.178% 0.1461880%
City Twentynine Palms San Bernardino 0.002% 0.0012605%
City Upland San Bernardino 0.052% 0.0424460%
City Victorville San Bernardino 0.033% 0.0269400%
City Yucaipa San Bernardino 0.016% 0.0128772%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
308
APPENDIX 1
10of15
City Yucca Valley San Bernardino 0.003% 0.0021228%
County San Diego County San D
iego 5.706% 6.980% 5.9309748%
City Carlsbad San Diego 0.128% 0.1050485%
City Chula Vista San Diego 0.189% 0.231% 0.1961456%
City Coronado San Diego 0.044% 0.0359095%
City El Cajon San Diego 0.113% 0.0933582%
City Encinitas San Diego 0.061% 0.074% 0.0630289%
City Escondido San Diego 0.145% 0.1192204%
City Imperial Beach San Diego 0.014% 0.0118283%
City La Mesa San Diego 0.055% 0.068% 0.0575593%
City Lemon Grove San Diego 0.022% 0.0183911%
City National City San Diego 0.080% 0.0656808%
City Oceanside San Diego 0.213% 0.1753428%
City Poway San Diego 0.062% 0.0511040%
City San Diego San Diego 1.975% 2.416% 2.0531169%
City San Marcos San Diego 0.089% 0.0733897%
City Santee San Diego 0.033% 0.0268401%
City Solana Beach San Diego 0.017% 0.0138564%
City Vista San Diego 0.052% 0.0425144%
Consolidated San Francisco San F
rancisco 3.026% 3.702% 3.1457169%
County San Joaquin County San J
oaquin 1.680% 2.055% 1.7460399%
City Lathrop San Joaquin 0.009% 0.0075394%
City Lodi San Joaquin 0.053% 0.0439484%
City Manteca San Joaquin 0.054% 0.0443454%
City Ripon San Joaquin 0.013% 0.0104219%
City Stockton San Joaquin 0.313% 0.383% 0.3256176%
City Tracy San Joaquin 0.084% 0.0692047%
County San Luis Obispo County San Luis O
bispo 0.816% 0.999% 0.8484126%
City Arroyo Grande San Luis Obispo 0.024% 0.0199053%
City Atascadero San Luis Obispo 0.029% 0.0240680%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles) San Luis Obispo 0.043% 0.0353456% City Grover Beach San Luis Obispo 0.017% 0.0137881%
City Morro Bay San Luis Obispo 0.020% 0.0160922%
City San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo 0.077% 0.0637841%
309
APPENDIX 1
11of15
County San Mateo County San M
ateo 1.074% 1.313% 1.1159599%
City Belmont San Mateo 0.021% 0.0169860%
City Burlingame San Mateo 0.019% 0.0152537%
City Daly City San Mateo 0.044% 0.0363880%
City East Palo Alto San Mateo 0.013% 0.0103982%
City Foster City San Mateo 0.020% 0.0166101%
City Half Moon Bay San Mateo 0.004% 0.0031638%
City Hillsborough San Mateo 0.013% 0.0110029%
City Menlo Park San Mateo 0.015% 0.0126209%
City Millbrae San Mateo 0.013% 0.0105836%
City Pacifica San Mateo 0.016% 0.0130625%
City Redwood City San Mateo 0.056% 0.0463511%
City San Bruno San Mateo 0.021% 0.0172161%
City San Carlos San Mateo 0.013% 0.0108885%
City San Mateo San Mateo 0.052% 0.0425841%
City South San Francisco San Mateo 0.043% 0.0353943%
County Santa Barbara County Santa B
arbara 1.132% 1.385% 1.1768968%
City Carpinteria Santa Barbara 0.001% 0.0008938%
City Goleta Santa Barbara 0.004% 0.0028969%
City Lompoc Santa Barbara 0.047% 0.0389379%
City Santa Barbara Santa Barbara 0.122% 0.1004559%
City Santa Maria Santa Barbara 0.058% 0.0479179%
County Santa Clara County Santa C
lara 2.404% 2.941% 2.4987553%
City Campbell Santa Clara 0.014% 0.0112566%
City Cupertino Santa Clara 0.008% 0.0066824%
City Gilroy Santa Clara 0.025% 0.0202891%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Los Altos Santa Clara 0.013% 0
.0103338%
City Los Gatos Santa Clara 0.013% 0
.0103220%
City Milpitas Santa Clara 0.036% 0
.0298120%
City Morgan Hill Santa Clara 0.015% 0
.0124619%
City Mountain View Santa Clara 0.041% 0
.0334608%
City Palo Alto Santa Clara 0.039% 0
.0323080%
City San Jose Santa Clara 0.294% 0.360% 0
.3054960%
City Santa Clara Santa Clara 0.067% 0
.0549723%
310
APPENDIX 1
12of15
City Saratoga Santa Clara 0.004% 0
.0034161%
City Sunnyvale Santa Clara 0.053% 0
.0434069%
County Santa Cruz County Santa Cruz 0.783% 0.957% 0
.8135396%
City Capitola Santa Cruz 0.020% 0
.0168191%
City Santa Cruz Santa Cruz 0.143% 0
.1180348%
City Scotts Valley Santa Cruz 0.015% 0
.0126525%
City Watsonville Santa Cruz 0.063% 0
.0520136%
County Shasta County Shasta 1.095% 1.339% 1
.1380191%
City Anderson Shasta 0.024% 0
.0198896%
City Redding Shasta 0.284% 0
.2334841%
City Shasta Lake Shasta 0.004% 0
.0031993%
County Siskiyou County Siskiyou 0.228% 0.279% 0
.2373393%
County Solano County Solano 0.760% 0
.6260795%
City Benicia Solano 0.031% 0
.0253903%
City Dixon Solano 0.016% 0
.0130849%
City Fairfield Solano 0.109% 0
.0897317%
City Suisun City Solano 0.021% 0
.0176183%
City Vacaville Solano 0.119% 0
.0976497%
City Vallejo Solano 0.167% 0
.1373644%
County Sonoma County Sonoma 1.218% 1.490% 1
.2661290%
City Healdsburg Sonoma 0.032% 0
.0266929%
City Petaluma Sonoma 0.081% 0
.0667507%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Rohnert Park Sonoma 0.041% 0.0340759%
City Santa Rosa Sonoma 0.184% 0.1519070%
City Sonoma Sonoma 0.022% 0.0183438%
City Windsor Sonoma 0.016% 0.0129298%
County Stanislaus County S
tanislaus 1.722% 1.4182273%
City Ceres Stanislaus 0.041% 0.0340260%
City Modesto Stanislaus 0.217% 0.1788759%
City Newman Stanislaus 0.006% 0.0046964%
City Oakdale Stanislaus 0.018% 0.0145531%
City Patterson Stanislaus 0.015% 0.0126590%
City Riverbank Stanislaus 0.010% 0.0085699%
City Turlock Stanislaus 0.065% 0.0531966%
311
APPENDIX 1
13of15
County Sutter County S
utter 0.306% 0.374% 0.3179548%
City Yuba City Sutter 0.074% 0.0606242%
County Tehama County T
ehama 0.213% 0.261% 0.2216654%
City Red Bluff Tehama 0.014% 0.0117771%
County Trinity County T
rinity 0.082% 0.101% 0.0855476%
County Tulare County T
ulare 0.809% 0.990% 0.8410949%
City Dinuba Tulare 0.014% 0.0116929%
City Exeter Tulare 0.004% 0.0032479%
City Farmersville Tulare 0.003% 0.0027879%
City Lindsay Tulare 0.007% 0.0057111%
City Porterville Tulare 0.021% 0.0171845%
City Tulare Tulare 0.037% 0.0302273%
City Visalia Tulare 0.066% 0.0545872%
County Tuolumne County T
uolumne 0.486% 0.594% 0.5047621%
County Ventura County V
entura 2.192% 2.681% 2.2781201%
City Camarillo Ventura 0.002% 0.0012815%
City Fillmore Ventura 0.002% 0.0020294%
City Moorpark Ventura 0.008% 0.0067337%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City O
xnard Ventura 0.156% 0.190% 0
.1617338%
City Port Hueneme Ventura 0.021% 0
.0174145%
City San Buenaventura (Ventura) Ventura 0.085% 0
.0702181%
City Santa Paula Ventura 0.014% 0
.0119072%
City Simi Valley Ventura 0.065% 0
.0533043%
City Thousand Oaks Ventura 0.022% 0
.0179902%
County Yolo County Yolo 0.357% 0.437% 0
.3713319%
City Davis Yolo 0.055% 0
.0451747%
City West Sacramento Yolo 0.066% 0
.0544321%
City Woodland Yolo 0.058% 0
.0477904%
County Yuba County Yuba 0.214% 0.262% 0
.2225679%
City Marysville Y
uba 0.014% 0
.0112079%
312
APPENDIX 2

CALIFORNIA-SUBDIVISION BACKSTOP AGREEMENT
On August 6, 2021, Judge Polster of the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio issued an Order (the Order), docket number 3814, in In Re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL 2804, addressing contingent attorney fee contracts between political subdivisions eligible to participate in the Zydus Settlement and their counsel.

In light of the Order, and at the request of [SUBDIVISION], the [SUBDIVISION], its counsel [COUNSEL], and the California Attorney General, on behalf of the State of California, are entering into this California-Subdivision Backstop Agreement (Backstop Agreement). [SUBDIVISION] and [COUNSEL] intend this Backstop Agreement to constitute a State Back- Stop Agreement as that term is used in the Order and in Exhibit R (Agreement on Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Expenses) of the Zydus Settlement Agreement.

Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, [SUBDIVISION] may, subject to the limitations of the Zydus Settlement Agreement and CA Zydus Allocation Agreement, as well as any other limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Zydus Settlement CA Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to [COUNSEL]. Any such payment from [SUBDIVISION] to [COUNSEL] from [SUBDIVISION’S] CA Subdivision Fund allocation will not exceed [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED ONE-THIRD OR 5% OUT OF THE 15%] out of the [SUBDIVISION’S] 15% CA Subdivision Fund allocation; provided further that such payments, together with any contingency-fees that [COUNSEL] may receive from the Attorney Fee Fund will not exceed a
total contingency fee of [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED 15%] of the total gross recovery of [SUBDIVISION] from the Zydus Settlement Agreement. [COUNSEL] certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund created under the Zydus Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this backstop agreement. [COUNSEL] further certify that they are not seeking and will not accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of “State Back- Stop Agreement” in Exhibit R of the Zydus Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to be between “a Settling State” and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment of any state funds to [SUBDIVISION], [COUNSEL], or any other party.
[DATE] [SUBDIVISION SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [COUNSEL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
1 313
Department: Communications and Community
Relations
Prepared By: Vanny Khu
Staff Member Presenting: Dan Bell, Executive
Director of Communications and Community
Relations
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 13
SUBJECT:

AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH

INTERPERSONAL FREQUENCY, LLC, FOR WEBSITE REDESIGN SERVICES

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
October
7, 2025
SECTION:

CONSENT CALENDAR

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Interpersonal Frequency, LLC, of McLean, VA, for website translation services, increasing the contract amount by $54,769 for a total contract not-to-exceed amount of $1,100,357 and to extend the term to September 4, 2028.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Operate in a Businesslike Manner
FISCAL IMPACT:

The proposed Amendment No. 2 will increase the authorized contract amount of $1,045,588 by $11,304 for year one, $8,295 in year two, and $8,710 in year three for the Weglot module, as well as $8,820 annually for three years for the Swiftype module, for a new total not-to- exceed contract amount of $1,100,357. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Adopted Budget includes appropriations in the General Fund and the Information Technology Fund. If approved, appropriations will be added to the future years’ budgets consistent with the annual budget adoption process.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

The City of Ontario has engaged Interpersonal Frequency LLC since 2021 to support and manage the City’s main website. On September 5, 2023, the City Council approved a new agreement for Interpersonal Frequency to redesign the main City website and two microsites - Economic Development and the Museum - and to extend the maintenance and support through September 2026 for a not-to-exceed amount of $1,001,975.

On September 17, 2024, the City Council approved Amendment No.1 to increase the not-to-exceed contract amount to $1,045,588 for additional design elements that were not in the original agreement. The enhancements aimed to improve user-friendliness, strengthen accessibility, and reinforce the City’s branding.
314
Amendment No. 2 proposes the purchase and implementation of Weglot, a translation and localization service, for the City’s main website and microsites, along with licensing for Swiftype search. Weglot will provide seamless translation of website content into up to 10 languages. This will signiﬁcantly improve accessibility and inclusivity on the City’s websites by ensuring that residents and visitors can easily access information on City programs, services, and initiatives in their preferred language. Swiftype will enhance the Think Business website by enabling faster and more accurate searches through its built-in search bar. Approval of Amendment No. 2 will enable the City to move forward with these enhancements, ensuring its digital platforms better serve Ontario’s diverse community.
315
46700.00100\33287662.1

Page 1 of 6 ends

BB&K 2020

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO AND

INTERPERSONAL FREQUENCY, LLC

1. Parties and Date.

This Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (as defined herein) is made and entered as of ____________, by and between the City of Ontario (“City”) and Interpersonal Frequency, LLC, a limited liability company “Consultant.” City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

2. Recitals.

2.1 Agreement. T he City and Consultant have entered into an agreement entitled “Professional Services Agreement” dated September 5, 2023 (“Agreement”).

2.2 Amendment Purpose . T he City and Consultant desire to amend the A greement to include website translation services to the scope of work, increase the total not -to-exceed compensation by $54,769, for a new not -to-exceed amount of $1,100,357, and extend the term for 2 additional years to September 4, 2028.

2.3 Amendment Authority. This Amendment No. 2 is authorized pursuant to Section

3.1.1 of the Agreement.

3. Terms.

3.1 Amendment. Exhibit “A” – Scope of Services is hereby amended to add Attachment “A”, which is hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All other previously added or deleted scope of services are retained in their entirety.

PAUL S. LEON
MAYOR

ALAN D. WAPNER

MAYOR PRO TEM

JIM W. BOWMAN

DEBRA PORADA

DAISY MACIAS

COUNCIL MEMBERS

SHEILA MAUTZ

CITY CLERK

JAMES R. MILHISER

CITY TREASURER

SCOTT OCHOA

CITY MANAGER
316
46700.00100\33287662.1

Page 2 of 6 ends

BB&K 2020

Section 3.1.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

Section 3.1.1 General Scope of Services . Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional Website Design and Maintenance consulting services necessary for the Project (“Service”). The Services are more parti cularly described in Attachment “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the attached attachments hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.”

Section 3.1.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

Section 3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from September 5, 2023, to September 4, 2028, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. The City shall have the unilateral option, at its sole discretion, to renew this Agreement .

Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. The Parties may, by mutual, written consent, extend the term of this agreement if necessary to complete the services.

Section 3.2.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

Section 3.2.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed one million, one-hundred thousand, three-hundred fifty-seven dollars ($1,100,357) without written approval of the City Council of City Manager, as applicable. Extra Work may authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in the Agreement.”

3.2 Continuing Effect of Agreement . Except as amended by this Amendment No. 2, all other provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment No. 2. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 2, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment No. 2.

3.3 Adequate Consideration. The Parties hereto irrevocably stipulate and agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the performance of the obligations they have undertaken pursuant to this Amendment No. 2.

3.4 Severability. If any portion of this Amendment No. 2 is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall 317
46700.00100\33287662.1

Page 3 of 6 ends

BB&K 2020

continue in full force and effect.

3.5 Integration. This Amendment represents the entirety of the Parties’ understanding relating to the subject of this Amendment, including written or verbal communications between the Parties, which shall have no relevance unless expressly incorporated herein. This is an integrated amendment.

[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

318
46700.00100\33287662.1

Page 4 of 6 ends

BB&K 2020

SIGNATURE PAGE FOR AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO

AND INTERPERSONAL FREQUENCY, LLC

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Amendment No. 2 as of the day and year first above written.

CITY OF ONTARIO INTERPERSONAL FREQUENCY, LLC

By:

Its:

Printed Name:

By:

Its:

Printed Name:

Approved By:

Scott Ochoa
City Manager
Approved as to Form:

_____________________________________
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney

Attested By:

City Clerk

319
46700.00100\33287662.1

Page 5 of 6 ends

BB&K 2020

ATTACHMENT A
320
46700.00100\33287662.1

Page 6 of 6 ends

BB&K 2020

321
Department: Utilities
Prepared By: Thomas Palmieri
Staff Member Presenting: Scott Burton, Utilities
General Manager
Reviewed By: Dennice Raygoza, Albert G
Gastelum, Michael Sigsbee
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 14
SUBJECT:

AN AMENDMENT TO THE DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES INC. FOR WELL NO. 53 PROJECT

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
October
7, 2025
SECTION:

CONSENT CALENDAR

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Design Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates Inc. of Riverside, California, for additional design services for Well No. 53 Project, OMUC Contract No.

UT1063 in the amount of $124,393 for a new total revised not-to-exceed amount of $690,399 and a term from August 16, 2022 to August 16, 2026.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Invest in the Growth and Evolution of the City's Economy Operate in a Businesslike Manner
Invest in the City's Infrastructure (Water, Streets, Sewers, Parks, Storm Drains and Public Facilities)
FISCAL IMPACT:

Proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Design Services Agreement with Albert A.

Webb Associates Inc. (Webb) is for additional design services for Well No. 53 in the amount of $124,393 for a new total revised not-to-exceed amount of $690,399. Expenditures will be based on Webb’s proposal and negotiated rates.

The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program Budget includes appropriations from the Water Capital Fund. This project is one of several projects identiﬁed in the Water Bond issuance approved by City Council on July 17, 2024. There is no impact to the General Fund.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

The City currently has eighteen active groundwater wells. The Water Master Plan identiﬁes the need for additional groundwater wells to expand existing water supply capacity and reliability to meet the future water demands of Ontario. Well No. 53 is located on the southwest side of Doubleday Avenue, approximately 950 feet west of Dupont Avenue (See Exhibit) and is the second of four new wells that will be installed on the east side of the Ontario International Airport (ONT).
322
In August 2022, the City entered into an Agreement with Webb for drilling and equipping design, construction management, and inspection services for Well No. 53 to be implemented over two phases.

The initial phase of the scope of work (drilling) included a preliminary design report (PDR) and a complete set of construction plans and speciﬁcations to drill and construct an approximately 1,000-foot-deep well. The second phase (equipping) includes the equipment and facilities to produce 2,000 to 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) of drinking water. Construction management and inspection services are included in both phases.

In October 2024, the City approved the plans and speciﬁcations and awarded the construction contract to Best Drilling and Pump Inc. for the drilling and construction of Well No. 53 with an anticipated completion date of Fall 2025.

Following completion of the drilling construction, Webb is to proceed with the second phase for equipping design. The design will consist of an above ground masonry building, well pump and motor, on-site sodium hypochlorite (chlorine) generation system, instrumentation and controls, and site landscaping. Webb will prepare a complete PDR, plans and speciﬁcations, construction package, including project construction schedule, estimated construction cost, construction management, and inspection services.

As a result of the work included in the City’s 2025 draft Master Plan, the Well No. 53 site has been identiﬁed to serve as a centralized treatment facility in the future for the four wells on the east side of ONT. This future treatment facility is anticipated to treat 10,000 GPM of water.

The City requested Webb to provide additional drilling inspection services, and to perform additional design services for the enlargement of the building, and preparation of updated legal descriptions and exhibits needed to complete land exchange documentation for several other wells.

Staﬀ is recommending the approval of Amendment No. 2 to the Design Services Agreement based on Webb’s experience, qualiﬁcations, familiarity with the Project, and performance in providing these services.
323
46700.00100\33287662.1

Page 1 of 5 ends

BB
&K 2020

AM
ENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO AND
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES

1. Parties and Date.

This Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (as defined herein) is made and entered as of ____________, by and between the City of Ontario (“City”) and Albert A. Webb Associates , a Corporation (“Consultant”) . City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

2. Recitals.

2.1 Agreement. The City and Consultant have entered into an agreement entitled “Design Services Agreement for the UT1063 – Well No. 53 ” dated August 16, 2022 (“Agreement”).

2.2 Amendment Purpose. The City and Consultant desire to amend this Agreement to increase the compensation by One Hundred Twenty-Four Thousand, Three Hundred Ninety- Three Dollars ($124,393) for a total-not-to-exceed compensation of Six Hundred Ninety Thousand, Three Hundred Ninety-Nine Dollars ($690,399) and include the proposal for the additional scope of work to Exhibit A and Exhibit B. This increase in compensation is for the additional scope of work listed in the attached Consultants’ Proposal titled “Revised Budget Amendment Request No. 1 – Well No. 53 Project (UT-1063)” and dated August 25, 2025. The Parties have heretofore entered that Amendment No. 1 dated August 21, 2025.

2.3 Amendment Authority. This Amendment No. 2 is authorized pursuant to Section 3.8 “Additional Services” of the Agreement.

3. Terms.

3.1 Amendment. Section 3.10.1, Exhibit A, and Exhibit B of the Agreement is hereby PAUL S. LEON
MAYOR
ALAN D. WAPNER

MAYOR PRO TEM
JIM W. BOWMAN

DEBRA PORADA

DAISY MACIAS

COUNCIL MEMBERS

ENTER DATE

SHEILA MAUTZ

CITY CLERK
JAMES R. MILHISER

CITY TREASURER

SCOTT OCHOA

CITY MANAGER
324
46700.00100\33287662.1

Page 2 of 5 ends

BB&K 2020

amended in its entirety to read as follows:

3.10.1 Consultant’s Compensation for Basic Services. City shall pay to Consultant, for the performance of all Services rendered under this Agreement, the total not to exceed amount of Six Hundred Ninety Thousand, Three Hundred Ninety-Nine Dollars ($690,399) (“Total Compensation”). This Total Compensation amount shall be based upon, and may be adjusted according to, the fee schedule and related terms and conditions attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by reference. The Total Compensation, as may be adjusted upon mutual agreement, shall constitute complete and adequate payment for Services under this Agreement.

Exhibit “A” - SCOPE OF SERVICES is hereby amended to add updated Exhibit A which is hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All other previously added or deleted scope of services are retained in their entirety.

Exhibit “B” – FEE AND PHASING/FUNDING SCHEDULES is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with updated Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

amendment.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
325
46700.00100\33287662.1

Page 3 of 5 ends

BB&K 2020

SIGNATURE PAGE FOR AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO
AND ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Amendment No. 2 as of the day and year first above written.

CITY OF ONTARIO ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
By:

Its:

Printed Name:

By:

Its:

Printed Name:

Approved By:

Scott Ochoa
City Manager
Approved as to Form:
_____________________________________
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
Attested By:

City Clerk
326
46700.00100\33287662.1

Page 4 of 5 ends

BB&K 2020

Exhibit “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES
327
August 25, 2025
Mr. Thomas Palmieri, PE
Senior Associate Engineer
City of Ontario Municipal Utilities Company
1425 S. Bon View Avenue
Ontario, CA 91761
Re: Revised Budget Amendment Request No. 1 – Well No. 53 Project (UT-1063)
Dear Mr. Palmieri:

Albert A. Webb Associates (WEBB) is providing you with this Budget Amendment Request No. 1 related to the additional building design, unanticipated overages for drilling inspection, and overages associated with preparation of legal and plat exhibits as requested by the City for the Well No. 53 Project (UT-1063), hereinafter referred to as the Project.

Item No. 1 – The City requested the preparation of legal and plats for six (6) water wells and two (2) waterlines.

Item No. 2 – In association with unanticipated overages in inspection services related to the lost gravel feed tube and subsequent removal and reinstallation of casing, Webb and Geoscience are requesting additional budget. The City has also requested an additional pumping test at the end of the 24 -hr constant rate test. Geoscience’s requested budget amendment is included in Attachment 1.

Item No. 3 - In preparation of the preliminary site plan for the Project, the City has requested that the proposed well building be equipped with an office, the overall foot print of the building be enlarged to house the MIOX equipment for the well and the future 10,000 gpm treatment facility at the site, and to provide a bathroom on the site, not within the well building.

WEBB’s proposal was based on utilizing the well building layout recently completed for Well No. 43 and as indicated in initial Proposal for the Project. As a result of the requested changes, WEBB has prepared this budget amendment request to prepare the following:
• Preliminary design of the building layout for the Preliminary Design Report.
328

Page 2 of 2 ends

H:\2022\22-0133\Proposals, Contract and CO's \Change Order\CO 4\CO1_ Well No. 53 - Additional Building Design and Drilling CM Costs.docx • Preparation of completely new structural, architectural, and mechanical plans for the building.
• Preparation of structural calculations for the building.

The total costs for the additional services described herein are $124,393. Please see Attachment 2 for a breakdown of the hours and hourly rates. These budgets will be added to the applicable phase budgets. Should you have any questions regarding this request, please feel free to contact us at (760) 636-3899, respectively.

Sincerely,
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
Shane Bloomfield, PE
Senior Engineer
Attachments
329
Po Box 220, Claremont, CA 97177
p. 909-451-6650 f. 909-451-6638
www.gssiwater.com
August 25, 2025
Shane Bloomfield, PE
Senior Engineer
3788 McCray St
Riverside, CA, 92506
RE: Budget Amendment No. 2 for Professional Geohydrological Services Related to City of Ontario Well No. 53 Drilling and Equipping
Dear Shane:

Geoscience Support Services, Inc. is providing the requested Budget Amendment for services performed under the Professional Services contract for the City of Ontario Well 53 Project. This Budget Amendment outlines the overages from three tasks during the construction of Well 53 . The overages are due to unanticipated overages in inspections services related to the lost gravel feed tube and subsequent removal and reinstallation of casing . Separately, the City has requested an additional pumping test to be conducted starting at the end of the 24 -hr constant rate test . This test will be conducted over 12 hours and test interference between Well 53 and Well 49. Please see the table below cost of each additional task.

Budget Amendment No. 1
Line Task No. Task Name Cost of Additional Work
1 6.1 Provide Construction Management $5,875.00
2 6.8 Inspect Reaming (Enlargement) of Pilot Borehole and Caliper Survey $3,229.50
3 6.9 Inspect Installation of Casing, Screen, Filter Pack, and Annular Seal $22,427.00 4 6.12 Provide Additional Support for Interference Testing $3,500 5 Total Cost of Budget Amendment: $35,031.50
Geoscience Support Services, Inc. greatly appreciates the opportunity to provide services to the Webb and the City of Ontario.

Please feel free to contact me at 909.667.6650 if you have questions or would like to discuss any aspect of this Budget Amendment.

Sincerely,
Logan Wicks, PG
Senior Geohydrologist
ATTACHMENT 1
330
46700.00100\33287662.1

Page 5 of 5 ends

BB&K 2020

Exhibit “B”

FEE AND PHASING/FUNDING SCHEDULES
Consultant will invoice City on a monthly cycle based on the following fee schedule. Consultant will include with each invoice a detailed progress report that indicates the amount of budget spent on each phase and the total amount spent against the Total Compensation. Consultant will inform City regarding any out-of-scope work being performed by Consultant for which Consultant intends to seek compensation from City.

Amendment
Number
Scope Description Not to Exceed Fee

0.0 Design Services Agreement for the UT1063 – Well No. 53 $566,006

1.0 Time Extension Request No. 1 $0

2.0 Revised Budget Amendment Request No. 1 – Well No. 53 Project (UT-1063)
$124,393
Grand Total $690,399
331
24 Section 8. Fee Proposal
Bruce Davis
Stephanie
Standerfer
Shane
Bloomfield
Eliza Laws
Autumn
DeWoody
Monica Tobias
Guillermo
Gonzalez
Tyler Vigneault
Haley Franco
Virginia Waters
Dave Algranti
Two-Person
Survey Party
Brian Villalobos
Terry Watkins
Logan Wicks
Robert Sia
Cole Shaw
Jason Fuentes
Marissa
Bosworth
$293 $293 $279 $232 $197 $197 $173 $156 $115 $98 $279 $302 $274 $235 $213 $155 $135 $155 $107

1.0 Drilling - Preliminary Design
Project Start-Up 4 6 10 20 10 15 1 26 9,648$ 9,648$ Data Collection and Utility Research 8 10 16 34 4 8 18 30 11,066$ 600$ 11,666$ Initial Study of Environmental Impact 24 16 16 140 224 420 0 63,428$ 7,188$ 70,616$ Habitat Suitability Assessment 12 12 50 24 98 0 18,502$ 7,895$ 26,397$ Design Survey 6 6 1 4 17 0 3,933$ 2,750$ 6,683$ Geotechnical Investigation 2 1 1 4 0 993$ 23,340$ 24,333$ Site Evaluation/Hydrogeology/Preliminary Design Report 0 2 10 16 48 24 2 102 17,680$ 17,680$ Drilling - Plans and Specifications 10 4 14 4 16 40 75 26 5 166 32,816$ 230$ 33,046$ Phase 1 Subtotal 4 36 32 28 16 190 0 17 31 248 1 4 607 6 40 79 141 0 50 8 324 158,066$ 41,173$ 830$ 200,069$

2.0 Drilling - Bidding/Award Phase
Pre-Bid Conference 2 2 1 4 5 1 11 2,944$ 2,944$
Miscellaneous Bid Phase Services 2 2 1 4 10 14 29 5,826$ 5,826$ Conformed Documents 1 1 4 1 5 1,326$ 1,326$
Phase 2 Subtotal 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 2 12 15 14 0 0 2 45 10,096 $ -$ - $ 10,096 $

3.0 Drilling - Construction & Final Design Phase
Pre-Construction Meeting 2 2 4 5 1 10 2,670$ 2,670$ Construction Services During Drilling of Pilot Hole 0 1 6 6 85 98 14,437$ 1,170$ 15,607$ Zone and Water Quality Testing 0 8 10 60 78 12,110$ 725$ 12,835$ Well Design 1 1 2 15 10 32 1 60 10,909$ 1,500$ 12,409$ Construction Services During Reaming 0 2 5 50 57 8,285$ 670$ 8,955$ Construction Services During Well Completion 0 6 10 62 78 11,910$ 835$ 12,745$ Construction Services During Well Development and Testing 0 20 8 155 183 27,329$ 835$ 28,164$ Pump Selection 2 2 2 6 8 16 3,596$ 3,596$
Consultant Reports 0 4 10 14 45 16 4 93 16,311$ 230$ 16,541$ Review/Approve Contractor's Submittals, Progress
Payments and CO's 0 10 18 28 6,184$ 6,184$
Phase 3 Subtotal 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 9 87 86 45 452 16 6 701 113,741 $ -$ 5,965$ 119,706$ TOTAL HOURS AND COST (PHASES 1 - 3): 4 36 40 28 16 190 0 19 31 248 1 4 617 17 139 180 200 452 66 16 1,070 $281,903 $41,173 $6,795 $329,871

4.0 Equipping - Design Phase
Preliminary Design Report 2 16 6 2 26 0 6,216$ 2,500$ 8,716$ Workshop - Preliminary Design Report Review 2 4 2 8 0 2,014$ 1,200$ 3,214$ Process Required Permits 6 4 10 2 5 8 15 4,909$ 4,909$ Division of Drinking Water Coordination 4 4 2 10 2 5 8 15 4,745$ 4,745$ Preliminary Drinking Water Source Assessment Program
(DWSAP) 2 2 5 8 26 39 7,467$ 7,467$
Design of a Diesel Powerd Emergency Backup Generator 4 2 6 0 1,428$ 1,428$ Workshop - Review of Existing SCADA System 2 2 0 558$ 1,500$ 2,058$ Instrumentation (Hardware) Design 2 2 0 558$ 1,200$ 1,758$ Project Schedule 6 2 8 0 1,904$ 1,904$
Prepare Estimates 6 6 0 1,674$ 1,674$
Final Design 10 85 16 320 6 4 441 0 81,139$ 29,540$ 110,679$ Coordination with SCE 4 4 0 1,116$ 2,750$ 3,866$ Workshops - Development Advisory Board (DAB) 2 4 2 8 0 2,014$ 2,014$ Workshops - Construction Document Review 4 8 6 2 20 0 4,570$ 4,570$ Quality Control Review 4 12 16 0 4,520$ 4,520$
Potholing Services (5 Potholes) 2 2 0 558$ 6,800$ 7,358$ Phase 4 Subtotal 24 0 155 0 0 0 16 342 18 0 16 0 571 0 9 18 42 0 0 0 69 125,390$ 45,490$ -$ 170,880$

5.0 Equipping - Bidding/Award Phase
Pre-Bid Conference 4 2 6 0 1,428$ 650$ 2,078$ Miscellaneous Bid Phase Services 1 6 4 2 13 2,821$ 2,821$ Conformed Documents 2 6 2 10 1,724$ 200$ 1,924$ Phase 5 Subtotal 1 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 4 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 5,973 $ 650 $ 200 6,823 $

6.0 Supplemental Engineering Services
Surge Analysis 2 1 3 0 714$ 2,750$ 3,464$
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Eligibility 2 15 17 0 3,513$ 3,513$ Additional Design Services as Authorized by the City 51,455$ Phase 6 Subtotal 0 0 4 0 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 4,227 $ 2,750 $ - 58,432 $ TOTAL HOURS AND COST (PHASES 4 - 6): 25 0 171 0 15 0 16 355 22 0 16 0 620 0 9 18 42 0 0 0 69 $135,590 $48,890 $200 $236,135 TOTAL HOURS AND COST (PHASES 1 - 6): 29 36 211 28 31 190 16 374 53 248 17 4 1,237 17 148 198 242 452 66 16 1,139 $417,493 $90,063 $6,995 $566,006

CITY OF ONTARIO
Drilling and Equipping of Well No. 53
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOSCIENCE
LABOR
(Webb/Geoscience)

REIMBURSABLE

EXPENSES
TOTAL
Total Hours
Total Hours

SUB-CONSULTANT
COSTS

Page 1 of 1 ends

Original Proposal for Design Services Agreement for the UT1063 – Well No. 53 332
ATTACHMENT 2
Revised Budget Amendment Request No. 1 – Well No. 53 Project (UT-1063) 333

Well No. 53 Project
Exhibit

334
Department: Community Life & Culture
Prepared By: Lacey A Rightmer
Staff Member Presenting: Helen McAlary,
Executive Director Community Life and Culture
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 15
SUBJECT:

AMERICORPS STATE CONTINUATION GRANT FOR 2025-26

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
October
7, 2025
SECTION:

CONSENT CALENDAR

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute grant documents and accept a $368,000 AmeriCorps Continuation Grant for November 2025 through October 2026 to fund the Ontario Promise Corps project.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Pursue City's Goals and Objectives by Working with Other Governmental Agencies Encourage, Provide or Support Enhanced Recreational, Educational, Cultural and Healthy City Programs, Policies and Activities
FISCAL IMPACT:

If approved, additional appropriations and associated revenues will be included in the Grants Fund at a future quarterly budget update to City Council for approval as needed. The FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget includes appropriations in the General Fund for the City's cash match.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

On August 20, 2019, the City Council approved a 12-month AmeriCorps State Planning Grant for the City of Ontario. This grant was used to develop the Ontario Promise Corps program, a cradle-to-career collective impact program. The program implements services that aim to improve school readiness, improve school attendance, and increase college access and success within the local community. The AmeriCorps grant is administered on the state level by California Volunteers, an office of the State of California.

The Planning Grant outlined activities focusing on the AmeriCorps national service focus area of education. These activities provide services that contribute to improving educational outcomes for economically disadvantaged children and youth.

In 2020, the City of Ontario submitted a successful grant application to fund AmeriCorps members to implement the strategies developed during the Planning Grant phase. On August 4, 2020 the City Council approved a 12-month round of the Ontario Promise Corps program, funded through the AmeriCorps State Formula Grant. With subsequent approvals from City Council, the program received AmeriCorps grants for Fiscal Years 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024.

The Ontario Promise Corps program aims to recruit sixteen Full-Time AmeriCorps members each 335
program year. These members provide one-on-one educational support for low-income and at-risk students, foster mentor-mentee relationships, and oﬀer information and resources for higher education to Ontario residents.

The program also beneﬁts its members by acting as a workforce development program. Through their participation in the program, they gain real-world job and professional skills, making them prepared to succeed in our local workforce after their service ends.

The Ontario Promise Corps program operates in partnership with Hope Through Housing Foundation, Ontario-Montclair Schools Foundation and the Ontario City Library.

This year, AmeriCorps has awarded the Community Life & Culture Agency a $368,000 AmeriCorps Continuation Grant to continue these programs. Highlights of the grant budget include a full-time Administrative Specialist position that is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the grant at a total cost of $119,283, 16 AmeriCorps members with a state-mandated living allowance set at $30,000, healthcare, oﬃce supplies, training, and equipment costs. It also funds a part-time Program Specialist who focuses on outreach and program support. This one-year grant supports AmeriCorps activities from November 2025 through October 2026. Staﬀ will submit a new application for future funding.

The Community Life & Culture Agency requests that the City Council approve the execution of the 2025-26 grant documents, accept the grant funds, and approve the City cash match for the 2025-26 Ontario Promise Corps program year.
336
Department: Financial Services
Prepared By: Cruz Torres
Department:

Prepared By: Cruz Torres
Staff Member Presenting: Armen Harkalyan,
Executive Director of Finance
Reviewed By: Claudia Hernandez, Matthew
Hernandez
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 16
SUBJECT:

A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE FORMATION OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 69 (SOUTH ONTARIO LOGISTICS CENTER SERVICES); AND INTRODUCTION OF AN

ORDINANCE LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
October
7, 2025
SECTION:

PUBLIC HEARINGS

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council consider and:

A
.

Adopt a Resolution of Formation of Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services), proposing that the community facilities district be authorized to levy a special tax and proposing that an appropriations limit of the community facilities district be established;
B
.

Adopt a Resolution calling a special election for City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services);
C
.

Adopt a Resolution declaring the results of the special election and directing the recording of a Notice of Special Tax Lien; and
D
.

Introduce and waive further reading of an Ordinance levying special taxes within City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services).

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Operate in a Businesslike Manner
Focus Resources in Ontario's Commercial and Residential Neighborhoods Ensure the Development of a Well Planned, Balanced, and Self-Sustaining Community in Ontario Ranch
FISCAL IMPACT:

The use of Mello-Roos ﬁnancing in the South Ontario Logistics Center Services development
is projected to generate approximately
$88,518 per year,
at buildout, to fund
administrative fees and municipal services.

City Council approval will be required to process
annual special tax levies in future years.

337
BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 provides local government, with the consent from a majority of the property owners, the authority to establish community facilities districts for the purpose of levying special taxes to ﬁnance municipal services.

Municipal services that may be funded by a community facilities district include: police protection services, ﬁre protection and suppression services, ambulance and paramedic services, maintenance and lighting or parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space, ﬂood and storm protection services, maintenance and operation of ﬁber optic telecommunications, wireless communication and public safety camera systems and maintenance and operation of any real property of other tangible property with an estimated useful life of ﬁve or more years that is owned by the City.

Under the
Mello-Roos Act the initial steps in the formation of a community facilities district to ﬁnance municipal services are to adopt resolutions decla
ring the intention to establish a community
facilities district and authorize the levy of special taxes. Accordingly, on August 19, 2025, the
City
Council approved Resolution
No. 2025-132,
a Resolution of Intention to establish City of Ontario
Community Facilities District N
o. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services) a
nd authorize the levy
of special taxes.

The Resolution of Intention set the public hearing date for the regularly scheduled City Council meeting on October 7, 2025, to consider formation matters.

The South Ontario Logistics Center Services project addresses the development of approximately 147.59 gross acres located south of Eucalyptus Avenue, north of Merrill Avenue, west of Grove Avenue, and east of Bon View Avenue. At build out, the project is expected to include ﬁve industrial buildings totaling approximately 340,313 square feet.

Included, as part of the Resolution of Formation is the proposed Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax for the District. The term and structure of the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax for the South Ontario Logistics Center Services project is consistent with those of previously adopted Rates and Methods of Apportionment for Ontario Ranch community facilities districts. This ensures that the special tax rates levied on all residential property owners in community facilities districts in Ontario Ranch are developed in a consistent and equivalent manner. In addition, under the provisions of the Mello-Roos Act, to ensure that home buyers are making an informed decision, all residential builders in the Ontario Ranch districts are required to disclose the maximum annual special tax amount to each homeowner before entering into a sales contract.

Attached are three Resolutions and an Ordinance. The ﬁrst attached Resolution establishes the community facilities district, with the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes and authorizes the levy of special taxes within the district. The second attached Resolution calls for a special landowner election to be held on October 7, 2025. The third attached Resolution declares the results of the election, including a statement from the City Clerk as to the canvass of ballots, and directs the recording of the Notice of Special Tax Lien. The attached Ordinance authorizes the levying of special taxes.
338

RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,

CALIFORNIA, OF FORMA TION OF CITY OF ONTARIO COMM UNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 69 (SOUTH ONTARIO LOGISTICS CENTER

SERVICES), PROPOSING THAT THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT

BE AUTHORIZED TO LEVY A SPECIAL TAX AND PROPOSING THAT AN

APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT OF THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT BE ESTABLISHED.

WHEREAS, on August 19, 2025, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Ontario (the “City”), pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”), adopted a resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District Proposed to be Named City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services) and to Authorize the Levy of a Special Tax Therein” (the “Resolution of Intention”), stating its intention to establish City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services) (the “Community Facilities District”), to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy a special tax within the Community Facilities District for the purpose of financing certain services and setting the date for a public hearing to be held on the establishment of the Community Facilities District; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Resolution of Intention, notice of said public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin , a newspaper of general circulation published in the area of the Community Facilities District, in accordance with the Act; and

WHEREAS, on this date, the City Council opened, conducted and closed said public hearing; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Resolution of Intention, each officer of the City who is or will be responsible for providing one or more of the proposed types of se rvices to be financed by the Community Facilities District was directed to study, or cause to be studied, the proposed Community Facilities District and, at or before said public hearing, file a report with the City Council containing a brief description of the services by type that will in his or her opinion be required to adequately meet the needs of the Community Facilities District, and his or her estimate of the cost of providing such services; such officers were also directed to estimate the fair and reasonable cost of the incidental expenses proposed to be paid; and

WHEREAS, said report was so filed with the City Council and made a part of the record of said public hearing; and

WHEREAS, at the hearing, the testimony of all persons for or against the establishment of the Community Facilities District, the extent of the Community Facilities District and the furnishing of the specified types of services was heard; and

339

WHEREAS, written protests against the establishment of the Community Facilities District, the furnishing of any specified type or types of services within the Community Facilities District or the levying of a specified special tax were not made or filed at or before said hearing by 50% or more of the registered voters, o r six registered voters, whichever is more, residing within the territory proposed to be included in the Community Facilities District, or the owners of one -half or more of the area of land in the territory proposed to be included in the Community Faciliti es District and not exempt from the special tax; and

WHEREAS, there has been filed with the City Clerk of the City a letter from the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Bernardino indicating that no persons were registered to vote within the territor y of the proposed Community Facilities District as of August 21, 2025, which demonstrates that 12 or more persons have not been registered to vote within the territory of the proposed Community Facilities District for each of the 90 days preceding the close of said public hearing.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ontario as follows:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct , and the City Council so finds and determines.

SECTION 2. The Community Facilities District is hereby established.

SECTION 3. The name for the Community Facilities District is “City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services).”

SECTION 4. The services (the “Services”) proposed to be financed by the Community Facilities District pursuant to the Act are described under the caption “Services” on Exhibit A hereto. The incidental expenses proposed to be incurred are identified under the caption “Incidental Expenses” on Exhibit A hereto. No facilities are proposed to be financed by the Community Facilities District.

SECTION 5. The proposed special tax to be levied within the Community Facilities District has not been precluded by majority protest pursuant to Section 53324 of the Act.

SECTION 6. The City Council proposes that, except where funds are otherwise available, the Community Facilities District be authorized to annually levy within the Community Facilities District a special tax (the “Special Tax”) sufficient to pay for all Services, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all nonexempt real property in the Community Facilities District. The rate , method of apportionment and manner of collection of the Special Tax, in sufficient detail to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed Community Facilities District to estimate the maximum amount that he or she will have to pay, is specified in the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax (the “Rate and Method”) attached hereto as Exhibit B, which is by this reference incorporated herein. The obligation to pay the Special Tax may not be prepaid and permanently satisfied.

The Special Tax will be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes or in such other manner as the City Council shall determine, including direct billing of the affected property owners.
340

SECTION 7. The Special Tax may only finance the Services to the extent that they are in addition to those provided in the territory of the Community Facilities District before the date the Community Facilities District is created. The Services may not supplant services already available within that territory when the Community Facilities District is created.

SECTION 8. The name, address and telephone number of the office , department or bureau that will be responsible for preparing annually a current roll o f Special Tax levy obligations by assessor’s parcel number and that will be responsible for estimating further Special Tax levies pursuant to Section 53340.2 of the Act are as follows: City of Ontario, Financial Services Agency, 303 East B Street, Ontario, California 91764, (909) 395-2015 or email [email protected].

SECTION 9. Upon recordation of a notice of special tax lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the Special Tax shall attach to all nonexempt real property in the Community Facilities Distri ct and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the Special Tax obligation is canceled in accordance with law or until the Special Tax ceases to be levied and a notice of cessation of the Special Tax is recorded in accordance with Section 53330.5 of the Act.

SECTION 10. The boundary map of the Community Facilities District has been recorded in San Bernardino County in Book 92 at Page 55 of Maps of Assessments and Community Facilities Districts in the San Bernardino County Recorder’s Office (Document No. 2025-0199258).

SECTION 11. The City Council proposes that the annual appropriations limit, as defined by subdivision (h) of Section 8 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution, of the Community Facilities District be established at $45,500,000.

SECTION 12. Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the propositions to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy the Special Tax and to establish the appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District specified above shall be subject to the approval of the q ualified electors of the Community Facilities District at a special election. The City Council hereby finds and determines that no persons were registered to vote within the territory of the proposed Community Facilities District as of August 21, 2025, and that 12 or more persons have not been registered to vote within the territory of the Community Facilities District for each of the 90 days preceding the close of the public hearing held by the City Council on the establishment of the Community Facilities District.

Accordingly, pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, the vote shall be by the landowners of the Community Facilities District and each person who is the owner of land as of the close of said public hearing, or the authorized representative the reof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre that he or she owns within the Community Facilities District not exempt from the Special Tax . The voting procedure shall be by mailed or hand - delivered ballot.

341

SECTION 13. The City Council hereby finds and determines that all proceedings up to and including the adoption of this Resolution were valid and in conformity with the requirements of the Act. In accordance with Section 53 325.1 of the Act, such finding shall be final and conclusive.

SECTION 14. All action s heretofore taken by the officers, employees and agents of the City with respect to the establishment of the Community Facilities District, or in connection with or related to any of the matters referred to herein, are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified.

SECTION 15. The officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things that they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution and not inconsistent with the provisions hereof.

SECTION 16. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

The City Clerk of the City of Ontari o shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of October, 2025.

_____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

____________________________________

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP

CITY ATTORNEY

342

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )

CITY OF ONTARIO )

I, SHEILA MAUTZ, City Clerk of the City of Ontario, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario at their regular meeting held October 7, 2025 by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK

(SEAL)

The foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2025- duly passed and ad opted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held October 7, 2025.

_____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK

(SEAL)

343

EXHIBIT A

SERVICES AND INCIDENTAL EXPENSES

Services
The types of City services to be financed by the Community Facilities District are police protection services, fire protection and suppression services, ambulance and paramedic services, maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space, flood and storm protection services, maintenance and operation of fiber optic telecommunication, wireless communication and public safety camera systems and maintenance and operation of any real property or other tangible property with an estimated useful life of five or more years that is owned by the City.

Incidental Expenses
The incidental expenses proposed to be incurred include the costs associated with the creation of the Community Facilities District, determination of the amount of ta xes, collection of taxes, payment of taxes, or costs otherwise incurred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the Community Facilities District.

344

EXHIBIT B

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX

345

City of Ontario CFD No. 69 1 May 14, 2025

CITY OF ONTARIO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 69
(SOUTH ONTARIO LOGISTICS CENTER SERVICES)

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX

A Special Tax shall be levied on all Assessor’s Parcels in the City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services) (“CFD No. 69”) and collected each Fiscal Year commencing in Fiscal Year 2025-26, in an amount determined by the City Council of the City of Ontario through the application of the Rate and Method of Apportionment, as described below.

All of the real property in CFD No. 69, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent, and in the manner herein provided.

A. DEFINITIONS

The terms as may hereinafter be set forth have the following meanings:

“Act” means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter

2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code.

“Administrative Expenses” means the following actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to the administration of CFD No. 69: the costs of computing the Special Taxes and preparing the annual Special Tax collection schedules (whether by the City or CFD No. 69 or both); the costs of collecting the Special Taxes (whether by the County or otherwise); the costs associated with preparing Special T ax disclosure statements and responding to public inquiries regarding the Special Taxes; the costs of the City or CFD No. 69 related to an appeal of the Special Tax; the City’s administration fees and third party expenses; the costs of City staff time and reasonable overhead related to CFD No. 69; and amounts estimated or advanced by the City or CFD No. 69 for any other administrative purposes of CFD No. 69, including attorney’s fees and other costs related to commencing and pursuing to completion any foreclosure of delinquent Special Taxes.

“Assessor’s Parcel” means a lot or parcel shown on an Assessor’s Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor’s Parcel Number.

“Assessor’s Parcel Map” means an official map of the Assessor of the County designating parcels by Assessor’s Parcel Number.

“Assessor’s Parcel Number” means, with respect to an Assessor’s Parcel, that number assigned to such Assessor’s Parcel by the County for purposes of identification.

“CFD Administrator” means an official of the City responsible for determining the Special Tax Requirement, providing for the levy and collection of the Special Tax, and performing the other duties provided for herein.
346

City of Ontario CFD No. 69 2 May 14, 2025

“CFD No. 69” means City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services).

“City” means the City of Ontario, California.

“City Council” means the City Council of the City, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 69.

“County” means the County of San Bernardino.

“Fiscal Year” means the period starting July 1 and ending on the following June 30.

“Gated Community Attached Dwelling Unit” means a Unit within any residential building containing two or more dwelling units (including attached condominiums, townhouses, duplexes, triplexes, and apartments) within a gated community that, within such community, is primarily served by private interior streets.

“Land Use Class” means any of the classes listed in Table 1 below.

“Lower Income Household Welfare Exemption Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, an Assessor’s Parcel within the boundaries of CFD No. 6 9 that is subject to a welfare exemption under subdivision (g) of Section 214 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code (or any successor statute), as indicated in the most recent County assessor’s roll finalized prior to such Fiscal Year.

“Maximum Special Tax” means, with respect to an Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property, the maximum Special Tax determined in accordance with Section C below that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on such Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property.

“Multiple Family Dwelling Unit” means a Unit within any residential building containing two or more dwelling units, including attached condominiums, townhomes, duplexes, triplexes, and apartments, but excluding Gated Community Attached Dwelling Units.

“Non-Residential” means any buildings that are for commercial lodging use, commercial retail use, institutional use (e.g., churches, private schools), commercial restaurant use, office use, or industrial use.

“Non-Residential Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, an Assessor’s Parcel for which a building permit for new construction was issued after January 1, 2024, and before May 1 of the prior Fiscal Year, for a Non-Residential use.

“Property Owner Association Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, property within the boundaries of CFD No. 69 that was owned by a property owner association, including any master or sub-association, as of January 1 of the prior Fiscal Year.

347

City of Ontario CFD No. 69 3 May 14, 2025
“Proportionately” means that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy to the Maximum Special Tax is equal for all Assessor's Parcels of Taxable Property.

“Public Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, property within the boundaries of CFD No. 69 that is (a) owned by, irrevocably offered to, or dedicated to the federal government, the State, the County, the City, or any local government or other public agency or (b) encumbered by an easement for purposes of public or utility right- of-way that makes impractical its use for any purpose other than that set forth in such easement, provided that any property leased by a public agency to a private entity and subject to taxation under Section 53340.1 of the Act shall be taxed and classified according to its use.

“Rate and Method of Apportionment” means this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax.

“Residential Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, an Assessor’s Parcel for which a building permit for new construction of one or more Units was issued after January 1, 2024, and before May 1 of the prior Fiscal Year.

“Services” means the services authorized to be financed, in whole or in part, by CFD No. 69, including: police protection services; fire protection and suppression services; ambulance and paramedic services; maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads, and open space; flood and storm protection services; maintenance and operation of fiber optic telecommunication, wireless communication, and public safety camera systems; and maintenance and operation of any real property or other tangible property with an estimated useful life of five or more years that is owned by the City.

“Single Family Detached Dwelling Unit” means any residential building containing only one Unit on one legal lot, including single family residences and single family detached residential condominium units.

“Special Tax” means the special tax authorized by the qualified electors of CFD No. 69 to be levied within the boundaries of CFD No. 69.

“Special Tax Requirement” means the amount necessary in any Fiscal Year to pay the cost of the Services, Administrative Expenses, and an amount equal to Special Tax delinquencies based on the historical delinquency rate for Special Taxes, as determined by the CFD Administrator.

“Square Footage” or “Sq. Ft.” means, with respect to a building of Non -Residential Property, the gross floor area square footage reflected on the original construction building permit, or as set forth in other official records maintained by the City’s Building Department or other appropri ate means selected by CFD No. 69, for such building, plus any square footage subsequently added to a building of Non -Residential Property after issuance of a building permit for expansion or renovation of such building.

“State” means the State of California.

348

City of Ontario CFD No. 69 4 May 14, 2025
“Taxable Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, all Assessor’s Parcels of Residential Property and Non-Residential Property within the boundaries of CFD No. 69 which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below.

“Unit” means an individual single -family detached or attached home, townhome, condominium, apartment unit, or other residential dwelling unit, including each separate living area within a half-plex, duplex, triplex, fourplex, or other residential structure.

B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CATEGORIES

Each Fiscal Year, beginning with Fiscal Year 2025-26, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 69 shall be classified as Residential Property (Single Family Detached Dwelling Unit, Multiple Family Dwelling Unit, or Gated Community Attached Dwelling Unit) or Non - Residential Property and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment as determined pursuant to Sections C and D below.

C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX

The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor’s Parcel classified as Taxable Property shall be determined by reference to Table 1 below.

T
ABLE 1

MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX

Land Use Class Maximum Special Tax
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Residential Property:

Single Family Detached Dwelling Unit $1,426.38 per Unit Multiple Family Dwelling Unit $1,236.46 per Unit
Gated Community Attached Dwelling Unit $1,036.38 per Unit Non-Residential Property $0.260110 per Sq. Ft.

On January 1 of each Fiscal Year, commencing January 1, 2026, the Maximum Special Tax to be applied in the next Fiscal Year shall be subject to an automatic increase at a rate equal to 4.0% of the amount in effect for the prior Fiscal Year.

In some instances an Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax levied on such Assessor’s Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Tax for all Units of Residential Property and Square Footage of Non- Residential Property (based on the applicable building permits, final subdivision map, parcel map, condominium plan, or other recorded County map) located on that Assessor’s Parcel. 349

City of Ontario CFD No. 69 5 May 14, 2025
D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX

Each Fiscal Year, beginning with Fiscal Year 20 25-26, the CFD Administrator shall determine the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall then be levied Proportionately on each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax for such Assessor’s Parcel , until the Special Tax Requirement is satisfied. However, the Special Tax levied in any Fiscal Year shall not increase by more than 4.0% of the amount of the Special Tax levied in the prior Fiscal Year.

E. EXEMPTIONS
Notwithstanding anything in this Rate and Method of Apportionment to the contrary, no Special Tax shall be levied on Public Property or Property Owner Association Property.

No Special Tax shall be levied on Lower Income Household Welfare Exemption Property; provided, however, that if, in any Fiscal Year, applicable law does not require that Lower Income Household Welfare Exemption Property be exempt from some portion, or all, of the Special Tax, such portion, or all, of the Special Tax shall be levied on such property in accordance with this Rate and Method of Apportionment based on the Land Use Class to which the Assessor’s Parcel is assigned.

F. APPEALS

Any property owner may file a written appeal of the Special Tax with CFD No. 69 claiming that the amount or application of the Special Tax is not correct. The appeal must be filed not later than one calendar year after having paid the Special Tax that is disputed, and the appellant must be current in all payments of Special Taxes. In addition, during the term of the appeal process, all Special Taxes levied must be paid on or before the payment date established when the levy was made.

The appeal must specify the reasons why the appellant claims the Special Tax is in error.

The CFD Administrator shall review the appeal, meet with the appellant if the CFD Administrator deems necessary, and advise the appellant of its determination.

If the property owner disagrees with the CFD Administrator’s decision relative to the appeal, the owner may then file a written appeal with the City Council, whose subsequent decision shall be final and binding on all interested parties. If the decision of the CFD Administrator or subsequent decision by the City Council requires the Special Tax to be modified or changed in favor of the property owner, then the CFD Administrator shall determine if sufficient Special Tax revenue is available to make cash refund. If a cash refund cannot be made, then an adjustment shall be made to credit future Special Tax levy(ies).

This procedure shall be exclusive and its exhaustion by any property owner shall be a condition precedent to filing any legal action by such owner.

350

City of Ontario CFD No. 69 6 May 14, 2025
G. MANNER OF COLLECTION

The Special Taxes shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that the Special Taxes may be collected in such other manner as the City Council shall determine, including direct billing of affected property owners.

H. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX

The Special Tax shall continue to be levied indefinitely on an annual basis on all Taxable Property in CFD No. 69.

351

RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,

CALIFORNIA, CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION FOR CITY OF ONTARIO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 69 (SOUTH ONTARIO
LOGISTICS CENTER SERVICES).

WHEREAS, on this date, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Ontario (the “City”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”), adopted a resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, of Formation of City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services), Proposing that the Community Facilities District be Authorized to Levy a Special Tax and Proposing that an Appropriations Limit of the Community Facilities District Be Established” (the “Resolution of Formation”), establishing City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services ) (the “Com munity Facilities District”), proposing that the Community Facilities District be authorized to levy a special tax (the “Special Tax”) within the Community Facilities District for the purpose of financing certain services and proposing that an appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District be established at $45,500,000; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Act and the Resolution of Formation, the propositions to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy the Special Tax and to establish such appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District are to be submitted to the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District at a special election; and

WHEREAS, the City Council desires to designate the City Clerk of the City (the “City Clerk”) as the election official for such special election; and

WHEREAS, there has been filed with the City Clerk a letter from the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Bernardino indicating that no persons were registered to vote within the territory of the Community Facilities District as of August 21, 2025, which demonstrates that 12 or more persons have not been registered to vote within the territory of the Community Facilities District for each of the 90 days preceding the close of the public hearings on the establishment of the Community Facilities District; and

WHEREAS, there has been filed with the City Clerk consents and waivers of all of the landowners of record in the Community Facilities District consenting to the waiver of, and waiving, any time limit specified by Section 53326 of the Act and any requiremen t pertaining to the conduct of said special election, consenting to the holding of said special election on October 7, 2025 and consenting to the waiver of, and waiving, any impartial analysis, arguments or rebuttals, as set forth in Sections 53326 and 53327 of the Act; and

WHEREAS, the City Clerk has concurred in said waivers and has concurred in holding said special election on October 7, 2025.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ontario as follows:
352

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and the City Council so finds and determines.

SECTION 2. Pursuant to Sections 53326 and 53325.7 of the Act, the propositions to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy the Special Tax and to establish the appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District at an election called therefor as provided below.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby designated as the official to conduct said election.

SECTION 4. As authorized by Section 53353.5 of the Act, the propositions to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy the Special Tax and to establish such appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District shall be combined into one ballot proposition.

SECTION 5. The City Council hereby finds and determines that no persons were registered to vote within the territory of the Community Facilities District as of August 21, 2025, and that 12 or more persons have not been registered to vote within the territory of the Community Facilities District for each of the 90 days preceding the close of the public hearings heretofore held by the City Council on the establishment of the Community Facilities District. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, the vote shall be by the landowners of the Community Facilities District and each person who is the owner of land as of the close of said public hearings, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre that he or she owns within the Community Facilities District not exempt from the Special Tax.

SECTION 6. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District have (a) unanimously consented to the waiver of, and have waived, any time limit specified by Section 53326 of the Act and any requirement pertaining to the conduct of said election, (b) unanimously consented to the holding of said election on October 7, 2025, and (c) unanimously consented to the waiver of, and have waived, any impartial analysis, arguments or rebuttals, as set forth in Sections 53326 and 53327 of the Act. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the City Clerk has concurred in said waivers and has concurred in holding said election on October 7, 2025.

SECTION 7. The City Council hereby calls a special election to submit to the qualified electors of the Community Facilities Di strict the combined ballot proposition to authorize the Community Facilities to levy the Special Tax and to establish the appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District at $45,500,000, which election shall be held at 303 East B Street, Ontario, California , on October 7 , 2025 . The City Council has caused to be provided to the City Clerk, as the official to conduct the election, the Resolution of Formation, a certified map of sufficient scale and clarity to show the boundaries of the Comm unity Facilities District and a sufficient description to allow the City Clerk to determine the boundaries of the Community Facilities District. 353

The voted ballots shall be returned to the City Clerk not later than 7:30 p.m. on October 7, 2025; provided, however, that if all of the qualified electors have voted prior to such time, the election may be closed with the concurrence of the City Clerk.

SECTION 8. Pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, the election shall be conducted by mail or hand -delivered ballot pursua nt to Section 4000 et. seq. of the California Elections Code. Except as otherwise provided in the Act, the provisions of law regulating elections of the City, insofar as they may be applicable, shall govern the election.

SECTION 9. The form of the ballot for the election, which sets forth the measure to be submitted to the voters, is attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference incorporated herein, and such form of ballot is hereby approved. The City Clerk shall cause to be delivered to each of the qualifie d electors of the Community Facilities District a ballot in said form, together with all supplies and written instructions necessary for the use and return of the ballot. The number of votes to be voted by a particular landowner shall be specified on the ballot provided to that landowner.

The identification envelope for return of a ballot shall be enclosed with such ballot, shall have the return postage prepaid, and shall contain: (a) the name and address of the landowner, (b) a declaration, under penalty of perjury, stating that the voter is the owner of record or the authorized representative of the landowner entitled to vote and is the person whose name appears on the identification envelope, (c) the printed name and signature of the voter, (d) the date of signing and place of execution of the declaration described in clause (b) above, and (e) a notice that the envelope contains an official ballot and is to be opened only by the canvassing board.

Analysis and arguments with respect to the measure submitted to the voters are hereby waived, as provided in Section 53327 of the Act.

SECTION 10. The City Clerk shall accept the ballots of the qualified electors in the office of the City Clerk at 303 East B Street, Ontario, California, to and including 7:30 p.m. on October 7, 2025, whether said ballots be personally delivered or received by mail. The City Clerk shall have available ballots that may be marked at said location on the election day by said qualified electors.

SECTION 11. The City Council hereby determines that the services financed by the Community Facilities District are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon local agencies as a result of development occurring in the Community Facilities District.

SECTION 12. All actions heretofore taken by the officers, employ ees and agents of the City with respect to the special election called pursuant hereto , or in connection with or related to any of the matters referred to herein, are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified.

SECTION 13. The officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things that they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution and not inconsistent with the provisions hereof.
354

SECTION 14. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of October, 2025.

_____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

____________________________________

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP

CITY ATTORNEY

355

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )

CITY OF ONTARIO )

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK

(SEAL)

The foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2025- duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held October 7, 2025.

_____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK

(SEAL)

356

EXHIBIT A

OFFICIAL BALLOT

CITY OF ONTARIO
October 7, 2025

SPECIAL ELECTION

This ballot is for a special, landowner election. The number of votes to be voted pursuant to this ballot is ____.

INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS:

To vote on the measure, mark a cross (+ or X) in the voting square after the word “YES” or after the word “NO”. All distinguishing marks or erasures are forbidden and make the ballot void. If you wrongly mark, tear or deface this ballot, return it to the City Clerk of the City of Ontario and obtain another.

CITY OF ONTARIO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 69
(SOUTH ONTARIO LOGISTICS CENTER SERVICES)

MEASURE: Shall the measure to authorize City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services) (the “Community Facilities District”) to levy a special tax in order to finance certain services and to establish the annual appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District at $45,500,000, as specified in the resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario on October 7, 2025 entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, of Formation of City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services), Proposing that the Community Facilities District be Authorized to Levy a Special Tax and Proposing that an Appropriations Lim it of the
Community Facilities District Be Established,” be adopted?

Yes:

No:

357

RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,

CALIFORNIA, DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND
DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN.

WHEREAS, on October 7, 2025, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Ontario (the “City”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”), adopted a resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the C ity of Ontario, California, Calling Special Election for City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services )” (the “Resolution Calling Election”), calling a special election to submit to the qualified electors of City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services) (the “Community Facilities District”) the combined ballot proposition to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy a special tax and to establish the appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Resolution Calling Election and the provisions of the Act, the special election was held on October 7, 2025; and

WHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City (the “City Clerk”) has certified the canvass of the returns of the election and has filed a Canvass and Statement of Results of Election (the “Canvass”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ontario as follows:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct , and the City Council so finds and determines.

SECTION 2. The City Council has received, reviewed and hereby accepts the Canvass.

SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds and declares that the ballot proposition submitted to the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District pursuant to the Resolution Calling Election has been passed and approved by such electors in accordance with Section 53328 and Section 53325.7 of the Act.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to execute and cause to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino a notice of special tax lien in the form required by the Act, said recording to occur no later than 15 days following adoption by the City Council of this Resolution.

SECTION 5. All actions heretofore taken by the officers, employees and agents of the City with respect to the special election, or in connection with or related to any of the matters referred to herein, are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified. 358

SECTION 6. The officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things that they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable to accomplish the purposes of this Reso lution and not inconsistent with the provisions hereof.

SECTION 7. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of October, 2025.

_____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

____________________________________

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP

CITY ATTORNEY

359

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )

CITY OF ONTARIO )

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK

(SEAL)

The foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2025 - duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held October 7, 2025.

_____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK

(SEAL)

360

EXHIBIT A

CITY OF ONTARIO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 69
(SOUTH ONTARIO LOGISTICS CENTER SERVICES)

CANVASS AND STATEMENT OF RESULTS OF ELECTION

I hereby certify that on October 7, 2025, I canvassed the returns of the special election for City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services) held on October 7, 2025, that the total number of ballots cast in said Community Facilities District and the total number of votes cast for and against the combined ballot proposition submitted to the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District are as follows and that the totals as shown for and against such proposition are true and correct:

Qualified
Landowner
Votes

Votes
Cast

YES

City of Ontario Community Facilities
District No. 69 (South Ontario
Logistics Center Services) Special
Election, October 7, 2025
148 ___ ___ ___

MEASURE: Shall the measure to authorize City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services) (the “Community Facilities District”) to levy a special tax in order to finance certain services and to establish the annual appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District at $45,500,000, as specified in the resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario on October 7, 2025 entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, of Form ation of City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services ), Proposing that the Community Facilities District be Authorized to Levy a Special Tax and Proposing that an Appropriations Limit of the Community Facilities District Be Established,” be adopted?

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND this 7th day of October, 2025.

By:

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK

361

ORDINANCE NO. ________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,

CALIFORNIA, LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF ONTARIO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIS TRICT NO. 69 (SOUTH ONTARIO
LOGISTICS CENTER SERVICES).

WHEREAS, on August 19, 2025, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Ontario (the “City”), pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”), adopted a resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District Proposed to be Named City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services) and to Authorize the Lev y of a Special Tax Therein” stating its intention to establish City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services) (the “Community Facilities District”) and to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy a special tax (the “Special Tax”) within the Community Facilities District for the purpose of financing certain services (the “Services”); and

WHEREAS, on October 7, 2025, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on the establishment of the Community Facilities District, as required by the Act; and

WHEREAS, subsequent to the close of said hearing, the City Council adopted resolutions entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, of Formation of City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services), Proposing that the Community Facilities District be Authorized to Levy a Special Tax and Proposing that an Appropriations Limit of the Community Facilities District Be Established ” (t he “Resolution of Formation”) and “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, Calling Special Election for City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 69 (South Ontario Logistics Center Services ),” which resolutions established the Community Facilities District, proposed that the Community Facilities District be authorized to levy the Special Tax within the Community Facilities District, proposed that an appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District be established and called a special election to submit to the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District the combined ballot proposition to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy the Special Tax and to establish the appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District; and

WHEREAS, on October 7 , 2025 , an election was held in which the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District approved said proposition by more than the two-thirds vote required by the Act; and

WHEREAS, the City Council is the legislative body of the Community Facilities District.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

362

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby authorizes and levies the Special Tax within the Community Facilities District pursuant to Sections 53328 and 53340 of the Act, at the rate and in accordance with the method of apportionment set forth in Exhibit B to the Resolution of Formation (the “Rate and Method”). The Special Tax is hereby levied commencing in fiscal year 2025-26 and in each fiscal year thereafter until the last fiscal year in which the Special Tax is authorized to be levied pursuant to the Rate and Method.

SECTION 2. The City Council may, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 53340 of the Act, provide, by resolution, for the levy of the Special Tax in the current tax year or in future tax years at the same rate or at a lower rate than the rate provided by this Ordinance. In no event shall the Special Tax be levied on any parcel within the Community Facilities District in excess of the maximum tax specified therefor in the Rate and Method.

SECTION 3. The Special Tax shall be levied on all of the parcels in the Community Facilities District, unless exempted by law or by the Rate and Method.

SECTION 4. The proceeds of the Special Tax shall only be used to pay, in whole or in part, the cost of providing the Services and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act.

SECTION 5. The Special Tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure, sale and lien priority in the case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes or in such other manner as the City Council shall determine, including direct billing of the affected property owners.

SECTION 6. If for any reason any portion of this Ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the Special Tax is found inapplicable to any particular parcel within the Community Facilities District by a court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this Ordinance and the application of the Special Tax to the remaining parcels within the Community Facilities District shall not be affected.

SECTION 7. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption and shall cause a summary thereof to be published at least once, in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Ontario, California within fifteen (15) days of the adoption. The City Clerk shall post a certified copy of this ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ________day of October 2025.

_____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
363

ATTEST:

_________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________________

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP

CITY ATTORNEY

364

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )

CITY OF ONTARIO )

I, SHEILA MAUTZ, City Clerk of the City of Ontario, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Ordinance No. _______ was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Ontario held October 7, 2025, and adopted at the regular meeting held ___________, 2025 by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK

(SEAL)

I hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Ordinance No. _______ duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held ____________ and that Summaries of the Ordinance were published on ___________ and _____________, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper.

__________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK

(SEAL)
365
Department: Utilities
Prepared By: Dennice Raygoza
Staff Member Presenting: Scott Burton, Utilities
General Manager
Reviewed By: Dennice Raygoza, Albert G
Gastelum, Michael Sigsbee
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 17
SUBJECT:

A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION RELATED TO THE RATES FOR

WATER, SEWER AND SOLID WASTE SERVICES

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
October
7, 2025
SECTION:

PUBLIC HEARINGS

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council conduct a public hearing to consider all written protests and objections against the proposed increases in the rates for water, sewer, and solid waste services in accordance with California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 6(a), and Assembly Bill (AB) 2257 Government Code Section 53759.1 and 53759.2, and consider and approve a resolution related to the rates for water, sewer, and solid waste services.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

The City has retained Raftelis Financial Consultants Inc. (RFC) and HF&H Consultants LLC (HF&H) to conduct cost of service analyses and studies pertaining to the rates for water, sewer, and solid waste services covering Fiscal Year 2025-26 and Fiscal Year 2026-27. These reports have been presented to the City and are available to the public. Based on the studies and considering increased costs of service, increases to rates for water, sewer, and solid waste services are required. Therefore, rate increases are recommended for these services to become eﬀective on November 1, 2025, and July 1, 2026.

If approved, the overall recommended rate increases for a typical residential customer would result in an average increase to the combined monthly utility bill of approximately $8.65, or 7%, in the ﬁrst year and $9.82, or 7%, in the second year. Actual bill impacts will depend on customer demand and usage characteristics.

The City proposes to continue passing through a treatment charge for costs imposed on the City by Inland Empire Utilities Agency (“IEUA”). The City is proposing to authorize passing through any increases in the IEUA treatment charge (“IEUA Charge”) that are imposed on the City by IEUA for a 366
three-year period, commencing July 1, 2027, and any time thereafter through and including September 30, 2030. Any such annual pass through will only increase the IEUA Charge component of the sewer service fees, shall not exceed 10% in any calendar year, and in no event shall the rates for the IEUA Charge be increased by more than the cost of providing sewer treatment services. The IEUA Board has only approved treatment rates through July 1, 2026. The current monthly rate for the IEUA Charge for a single family residential unit (“Equivalent Dwelling Unit” or “EDU”) is $27.02 and will be $29.45 effective July 1, 2026.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:

Pursuant to Proposition 218 (California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 6), the City is required to conduct a public hearing and consider all written protests against the proposed changes and increases to the water, sewer, and solid waste rates. If at the conclusion of the public hearing, the written protests against the proposed changes do not constitute a majority of the City’s aﬀected parcels, the City Council may consider and adopt the proposed Resolution amending the water, sewer, and solid waste service charges and fees.

Pursuant to Proposition 218 (California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 6), the City is required to comply with the following procedures prior to increasing water, sewer, and solid waste service fees and charges:

Proposition 218 Procedure:
1 .

Parcels upon which the increased fee or charge is proposed to be imposed have been identiﬁed and Proposition 218 Notice “Notice” was mailed on August 20, 2025 to (a) the record owner (as deﬁned in California Government Code Section 53750(j) (the “Owner”) of each identiﬁed parcel (as deﬁned in California Government Code Section 53750(g), and (b) any customer of record who, at the time the notice is mailed, has a billing account with the City and is directly liable to pay the fee (“Customer”) for an identified parcel. 2 .

The Notice contained (a) the amount of the fee or charge; (b) the basis on which it was calculated; (c) reason for the increase, and (d) the date, time, and location the City Council will conduct a public hearing on the proposed increase.
3 .

A public hearing has been scheduled for October 7, 2025 (at least 45 days after the Notice was mailed) to consider all written protests against the proposed increase to the fee or charge. If, at the conclusion of the hearing, written protests against the proposed increased fee are presented by a majority of Owners/Customers of parcels to be charged, the City may not increase the fee.

Resolution 2007-097 (Adopted on August 21, 2007) established the following procedures for considering protests against proposed rate increases in accordance with California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 6(a):
1 .

Each Owner or Customer may submit one written protest per parcel. Each protest must be submitted to the City Clerk at 303 East “B” Street, Ontario, California 91764, or in person at the public hearing.
367
2 .

All protests must be received by the City Clerk by the close of the public hearing. Any protest received after the close of the public hearing, even if postmarked prior to that time, will not be accepted or counted.
3 .

Each protest must be in writing and provide the location of the identiﬁed parcel (by assessor’s parcel number or street address) and include the signature of the Owner or Customer.

Protests submitted by e-mail will not be accepted. Although oral comments or testimony at the public hearing will not qualify as a formal written protest, the City Council welcomes input from the public during the public hearing on the proposed fee. 4 .

To be valid, a protest must (a) state that it is in opposition to the proposed fee, and (b) contain the original signature of an Owner or Customer of the identiﬁed parcel. Any protest that does not contain this information or an original signature of either an Owner or Customer shall not be tabulated.
5 .

Any Owner or Customer who submits a protest may withdraw it by submitting a written request to withdraw the protest. The request must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the close of the public hearing either at 303 East “B” Street, Ontario, California 91764, or in person at the public hearing. The withdrawal of a protest must include the location of the identiﬁed parcel (by assessor’s parcel or street address) and include the original signature of the Owner or Customer who submitted the protest. Only the Owner or Customer who submitted the protest may withdraw it. A request to withdraw a protest submitted by e-mail will not be accepted.
6 .

If an identiﬁed parcel is owned by more than a single Owner or more than one name appears on the City’s records as the Customer for the identiﬁed parcel, or if the Customer is not the Owner, each Owner or Customer may submit a protest; provided, however, only one protest will be counted per identiﬁed parcel. Any one protest submitted in accordance with these procedures shall be sufficient to count as a protest for that identified parcel. 7 .

The City Clerk shall determine the validity of all protests. The City Clerk shall not accept as valid any protest if the City Clerk determines that any of the following conditions exist:
a
.

The protest is not in writing.
b
.

The protest does not provide the location of the identiﬁed parcel by either assessor’s parcel number or street address.
c
.

The protest does not contain an original signature of an Owner or Customer of the property identified on the protest.
d
.

The protest does not state its opposition to the proposed fee, which is the subject of the protest proceeding.
e
.

The protest is not received by the City Clerk prior to the close of the public hearing on the proposed fee.
f
.

A valid request to withdraw the protest is received prior to the close of the public hearing on the proposed fee.
8 .

The City Clerk’s decision regarding the validity of a protest or a request for the withdrawal of a protest of shall constitute a ﬁnal action of the City and shall not be subject to any internal appeal.
9 .

The City Clerk may begin to tabulate protests at any time after the close of the public hearing 368
on the proposed fee. In the event the City Clerk cannot complete the tabulation of the protests before the conclusion of the City Council meeting, the City Council may continue the action to impose or not impose the fee to another City Council meeting date. The continuation of the action on the item to another meeting does not reopen the public hearing on the proposed fee.
10 .

A majority protest exists if valid written protests are timely submitted and not withdrawn by the Owners of or Customers with respect to, a majority of the identified parcels.

Proposed Rates
Utility services for water, sewer, and solid waste are operated as separate Enterprise Funds and are not commingled with the City’s General Fund. Utility services are funded by fees and charges (rates) and the budgets are set annually. Rates and services are reviewed periodically to ensure that the established service rates are:

Adequate to recover costs reasonably borne in providing the services.

Equitable to all customer classes.

In compliance with all State and Federal regulations.

Easily explained to customers.

The basis and reasons for the proposed changes and rate increases are to enable the City to recover operating expenses, and to maintain the operational and ﬁnancial stability of the utilities, while maintaining our commitment to provide the highest quality services at the lowest possible rates for our customers. The proposed rates are based on multi-year ﬁnancial plans. The multi-year ﬁnancial plans assess the City’s revenue requirements for both operations and capital facilities for water, sewer, and solid waste including information from the most recent master plans. The proposed rate increases will occur on November 1, 2025, and July 1, 2026.

AB 2257
AB 2257 was codiﬁed into Government Code Section 53759.1 and 53759.2 and provides an administrative remedy for ratepayers that wish to address a legal issue with the proposed rate increase. AB 2257 provides the ratepayers with a procedure for alleging noncompliance with the provisions of Article XIII D of the California Constitution for any new, increased, or extended fee or assessment via a timely submitted written objection to that fee or assessment that speciﬁes the grounds for alleging noncompliance.

By implementing this procedure, the City is able to address any potential legal issues prior to adoption of the rates. Failure of a ratepayer to submit a timely valid legal objection prohibits them from any future judicial action or proceeding to review, invalidate, challenge, set aside, rescind, void, or annul the fee or assessment for failure to comply with Proposition 218. This procedure also provides a framework for the administrative record that will be used in such a proceeding.

The City has complied with the requirements of AB 2257 to establish an administrative remedy for ratepayers. The Prop 218 Notice includes all necessary information regarding this procedure including instructions on how to submit a formal written and legal objection. Ratepayers had an 369
opportunity to submit an objection regarding a proposed property-related water fee or charge, or any special assessment, to the City (local public agency governing body’s) attention prior to the deadline established by the City as part of the rate or assessment consideration process (October 3, 2025).

The current and proposed rates are set forth in the attached resolution relating to services and fees for water, sewer, and solid waste.

Water
The Water Fund faces many challenges in providing safe, reliable water services. Many of these challenges continue to increase the cost of providing water services. Some of these include:

The impact of drought on imported water availability, which constitutes approximately ﬁfteen percent of the City’s water supply.

The cost of acquiring additional groundwater production rights needed to supplement the City production rights.

Increases in operational costs, electricity, and chemicals for treatment.

Increased costs to replace and reconstruct aging water facilities and to construct new facilities to correct existing system deficiencies.

Legislative mandates related to more stringent Drinking Water Standards and the presence of various plumes of groundwater contaminants, such as nitrates, volatile organics and perchlorate, which reduce the useful life of some of the existing wells, limit the areas where new wells can be drilled, or require expensive water treatment.

To oﬀset some of the cost increases to meet increasing regulatory requirements and pay for more expensive imported water, while maintaining or replacing aging infrastructure, the following cost avoidance and cost cutting measures have been implemented which will limit the proposed rate increase to a minimum:

Expanding the use of recycled water as an alternative to more expensive imported water supply options.

Reducing energy cost by controlling time of pumping and use of more efficient motors.

Increasing operational efficiency to reduce labor cost.

The rate structure for water has three customer classes – Single Family Residential Potable (“SFR Potable”), Non-Single Family Residential Potable (“Non-SFR Potable”) which includes multi-family, commercial and industrial customers, and Recycled (“Recycled”). The monthly water service charges consist of two components: (1) a ﬁxed monthly service charge (the “Readiness to Serve Charge” or “Base Charge”), and (2) a variable monthly water usage charge (the “Commodity Charge”). The rates for the Readiness to Serve Charge are established on the basis of the meter size of the property receiving water service from the City and are calculated to recover a portion of the City’s ﬁxed costs for water facilities, repairs and replacements, as well as the cost of meter reading, billing, customer service, and other costs of operating the system. The rates for the Commodity Charge are calculated on the basis of the cost of providing water, including purchasing water, managing the City’s water resources, costs for facilities necessary to accommodate peak use, and other costs that 370
the City incurs that ﬂuctuate with the amount of water consumed, or that are incurred in order to have capacity to serve high water users. For SFR Potable customers, the proposed Commodity Charge consists of three tiers which will impose higher rates per unit of water as the level of consumption increases, in relation to the proportionally higher cost to provide water as consumption increases. For Non-SFR Potable (multi-family, commercial, and industrial customers) and Recycled customers, the proposed Commodity Charges consist of single uniform rates.

In addition to the water service charges described above, the City also imposes a monthly private ﬁre service fee on certain properties as a condition of extending or initiating water service by (1) the installation of a private ﬁre hydrant, and (2) upon the request of the consumer or property owner for the delivery of water to the property for the purpose of private ﬁre service protection. The rates for the monthly ﬁre service fees are established on the basis of the size of the pipe through which water is delivered to the private ﬁre hydrant and is calculated to recover the cost of providing water to such properties for private fire service protection.

Based on the Study, and in light of increased costs, increases to the rates for water service fees are required to meet increased costs of service. The recommended water rates will increase the average residential water bill by $4.31 per month or 6% from the current rate of $69.93 per month to $74.24 per month eﬀective on bills sent on or after November 1, 2025, and by $5.21 per month or 7% to $79.44 per month eﬀective on bills sent on or after July 1, 2026. The recommended increase in water charges is needed to fund increased imported water costs, capital construction and replacement projects, and the increased cost of operations and water treatment.

Recycled water is an important part of Ontario' s water supply, and there has been rapid escalation in the cost to purchase recycled water from IEUA. As a result, the cost to provide recycled water to Ontario customers has increased. The overall recommended increase to the typical recycled water customer is estimated to increase by about 9% per month, each year. The recommended increase in recycled water charges is needed to fund the increased cost of purchasing recycled water and pay for operations, maintenance and capital construction.

Sewer
The City maintains the sewer collection system to provide a high level of customer service and comply with federal, state and local laws and regulations, particularly Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) and Sanitary Sewer Overﬂow (SSO) regulations. These regulations require that the collection system be properly managed, operated, and always maintained, and that adequate capacity to convey base ﬂows and peak ﬂows for all parts of the collection system is provided. The SSO regulations require video inspecting of all sewer lines and taking all feasible steps to stop and mitigate the impact of sanitary sewer overflows.

The City contracts with IEUA for sewer treatment at regional sewer treatment facilities owned and operated by IEUA. The IEUA Board of Directors sets the treatment rate per EDU (“Equivalent Dwelling Unit” = one single family residence) which is charged to the City and passed through on the City utility bills. The City proposes to continue passing through the IEUA Charge for costs imposed on the City by IEUA for treatment.

The rate structure for the sewer rates includes two customer classes – Residential and Non- 371
residential. Residential customers, including single family and multi-family, are charged based on EDUs assigned to the property. EDUs are calculated based on the average single family residential household size of 3.83 people, each using 55 gallons of water per day with an average return to sewer factor of about 57%. In order to come up with the rate for multi-family residential customers, which are projected to have 3.08 people per household, the EDU is multiplied by 80% of a single family residential customer (3.08/3.83 equals approximately 80%). Non-residential customers are generally charged based on an average return to sewer factor of 90% of water usage for the applicable billing period.

Based on the Study, and in light of increases to current and projected costs, increases to the rates for single family and multi-family customers are recommended. The recommended rates for single family customers will increase the average residential sewer bill by about $0.45 (3%) per month, from $14.18 to $14.63, eﬀective on bills sent on or after November 1, 2025, and by about $0.73 (5%) per month, from $14.63 to $15.36, eﬀective on bills sent on or after July 1, 2026. The recommended rates for multi-family customers will increase the average sewer bill by about $0.36 (3%) per month, from $11.40 to $11.76 per residential unit, eﬀective on bills sent on or after November 1, 2025, and by about $0.59 (5%) per month, from $11.76 to $12.35 per residential unit, eﬀective on bills sent on or after July 1, 2026. Based on the Study and the overall allocation of the cost to provide sewer services, the charge for non-residential customers is proposed to be increase from $1.41 per HCF to $1.54 per HCF on or after November 1, 2025, and $1.54 to $1.62 per HCF on July 1, 2026.

Solid Waste
The City’s Integrated Waste Division provides solid waste, recycling, and organics collection and related transportation, material processing, and disposal services to City residents and businesses.

The City currently has a contract with Burrtec for the processing of its recyclables and organics and a contract with Waste Management for the processing, transfer, and disposal of refuse at the El Sobrante Landfill.

Integrated Waste Fund expenses generally consist of:

Landfill disposal costs including handling, transfer, and recycling services.

Operation and maintenance expenses including collection and hauling; cart, bin, and roll oﬀ repair and replacement; household hazardous waste; supervision; utility billing and customer service.

Cost allocations to the General Fund for City provided services.

Street sweeping and illegal dumping clean up services.

A capital improvement program.

Integrated Waste continues to face the challenges related to the cost to provide handling, transfer, landﬁll disposal, and recycling, especially regarding legislative mandates related to expanded diversion and recycling to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions, such as commercial and industrial recycling, food waste recycling, tire, mattress, and electronic waste handling and recycling, which are resulting in increased cost of service. As a result of the implementation of new State-mandated waste diversion programs and organic waste diversion regulations promulgated in response to Senate Bill 1383 (SB 1383) that took eﬀect January 1, 2022, the City has experienced increased costs relating to legal requirements associated with combining food waste and yard 372
waste in organic carts.

To oﬀset some of the cost increases associated with handling and disposal and regulatory requirements, the following cost avoidance and cost cutting measures have been implemented which will limit the proposed rate increase to a minimum:

Extending the useful life of solid waste vehicles and equipment to reduce capital replacement costs.

Increasing operational eﬃciency to help reduce labor costs such as conducting special collection events.

The rate structure for the solid waste service fees has three customer classes – Residential, Commercial, and Industrial. For Residential customers, the City oﬀers a monthly rate for bundled solid waste, recycling, and organics service. For Commercial customers, the City oﬀers monthly rates for subscription service and per pick-up rates for on-call service for solid waste, recycling, and organics bin service. For Industrial customers, the fees are calculated based on the cost to service roll off containers and the disposal cost of the material type collected. The fees are calculated based on the type and size of containers used, which includes carts, bins, and roll oﬀs, the type of service, and the frequency of collection.

Outreach
In addition to the Prop 218 notiﬁcation that was mailed to each property owner or utility billing customer, the City conducted additional outreach to help ensure transparency and community engagement regarding the proposed rate adjustments and how to participate in the process.

Customers were informed through bilingual rate ﬂyers that were included in all customer bills, summarizing the proposed rate changes and encouraging customers to go to our dedicated webpage containing bilingual materials, social media posts, and informational videos. Staﬀ also attended community events to distribute ﬂyers and answer questions or provided guidance.

Throughout the process, customers were encouraged to access information via the website, social media, or direct contact with Staff.
373
RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO ,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING I NCREASES OR MODIFICATIONS TO THE

RATES FOR ITS WATER, SEWER, AND SOLID WASTE SERVICE
CHARGES.

WHEREAS, the City of Ontario (“City”) provides water, sewer, and solid waste services to residences, businesses and other properties in the City; and

WHEREAS, the City undertook rate studies to analyze the revenue requirements, and the rate structure necessary to fund infrastructure needs, programs, and operations and maintenance costs of the City’s water, sewer, and solid waste services and to proportionately allocate the costs of providing such services; and

WHEREAS, the City retained Raftelis Financial Consultants Inc., an independent rate consultant, to conduct a water and sewer cost of service analysis and rate study (the “Study”); and

WHEREAS, the City retained HF&H Consultants LLC, an independent rate consultant, to conduct a solid waste cost of service analysis and rate s tudy (the “Solid Waste Study”); and

WHEREAS, based on the Study and the Solid Waste Study, the City has determined that it is necessary to impose new, increased or modified rates for its water, sewer, and solid waste service charges (collectively herein, the “Charges”); and

WHEREAS, the rate structure for water has three customer classes - Single Family Residential Potable, Non-Single Family Potable, and Recycled; and

WHEREAS, the water service charges consist of two components: (1) a fixed charge (referred to as the “Readiness to Serve Charge” or the “Base Charge” on customer bills), determined on the basis of the size of the meter serving the property and (2) a variable monthly water usage charge (referred to as the “Commodity Charge” on customer bills) determined on the basis of the costs of providing water when demand fluctuates or to provide capacity to serve water users; and

WHEREAS, the City impo ses a monthly private fire servi ce fee on certain properties based on the size of the pipe through which water is delivered to the private fire hydrant to provide private fire service protection; and

WHEREAS, the City proposes to increase the rates for its water service charges effective November 1, 2025, and increased again on July 1, 2026; and

WHEREAS, the rate structure for sewer includes two customer classes – Residential and Non-Residential, with residential customers charged based on equivalent dwelling units , and is comprised of the City’s sewer service charges, and a separate charge to recover costs imposed on the City by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (“IEUA”); and
374

WHEREAS, the City proposes to increase the rates for its sewer service charges effective November 1, 2025, and increase again on July 1, 2026; and

WHEREAS, from time to time, IEUA adopts increases to the fees and charges imposed on the City for wholesale wastewater service, and to ensure sufficient revenues to provide continued sewer service to the City’s customers, the City is will annually pass through to its customers any increases in the rates for wholesale sewer service imposed by IEUA and recovered through the IEUA charge (“IEUA Pass Through Treatment Charge Adjustment”) for the period commencing July 1, 202 7, through and including September 30, 2030; and

WHEREAS, the IEUA Pass Through Treatment Charge Adjustment will only impact the IEUA charge component of sewer service fees, shall not result in an increase to the IEUA charge of more than 10% in any calendar year water or increase the City’s sewer service charges by more than the cost of providing sewer service, and property owners shall be notified at least 30 days in advance of any IEUA Pass Through Treatment Charge Adjustment; and

WHEREAS, the rate structure for solid waste , recycling and organics collection includes three customer classes – residential, commercial, and industrial , based on the container size, type of service, and frequency of collection; and

WHEREAS, the revenues derived from the Charges will not exceed the funds required to provide the services for which the Charges are imposed, and will be used exclusively for the operation and maintenance of the City’s water, sewer, or solid waste systems, as applicable; and

WHEREAS, the Charges are equitable to all customer classes; and

WHEREAS, the amount of the Charges will not exceed the proportional cost of the service attributable to each parcel upon which they are proposed for imposition; and

WHEREAS, the Charges will not be imposed on a parcel unless the service for which such Charge is imposed, is actually used by, or immediately available to, the owner of the parcel; and

WHEREAS, article XIII D, section 6 of the California Constitution (“Article XIII D”) requires that prior to imposing any increase to the Charges, the City shall provide written notice (the “Notice”) by mail of the new or increased Charges to the record owner of each parcel upon which the Charges are proposed for imposition and any tenant directly liable for payment of the Charges, the amount of the Charges proposed to be imposed on each parcel, the basis upon which the Charges were calculated, the reason for the Charges, and t he date time and location of a public hearing (the “Hearing”) on the proposed Charges, in addition to all information required pursuant to Government Code section 53759.1 in order ; and

375
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XIII D such Notice is required to be provided to the affected property owners and any tenant directly liable for the payment of the Charges not less than forty-five days prior to the Hearing on the proposed Charges , and the City provided such notice in compliance with Article XIII D; and

WHEREAS, the Hearing was held on this day, October 7, 2025; and

WHEREAS, at the Hearing the City Council heard and considered all oral testimony, written materials, and written protests concerning the establishment and imposition of the proposed rate increases for the Charges, and at the close of the Hearing the City did not receive written protests against the establishment and imposition of the proposed rate increases for the Charges from a majority of the affected property owners subject to Charges; and

WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to establish and impose the proposed Charges as set forth in Exhibit A, B, and C.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The City Council finds and determines that the foregoing Recitals are true and correct and incorporates the Recitals herein.

SECTION 2. Adoption of Water Service Charges . The City Council hereby adopts the water service charges, to be effective on the dates, in the amounts, and at the rates set forth in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 3. Adoption of Sewer Service Charges . The City Council hereby adopts the sewer service charges, to be effective on the dates, in the amounts, and at the rates set forth in Exhibit “B”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 4. Adoption of IEUA Pass Through Treatment Charge Adjustment .

The City Council he reby adopts the IEUA Pass Through Treatment Charge Adjustment for the period commencing July 1, 202 7, through and including September 30, 2030.

Pursuant to such authority, the City shall be authorized annually to increase the rate for the IEUA charge component of sewer service charges to account for any rate increase adopted by IEUA impacting the IEUA charge, provided the City shall not increase the IEUA charge component of the sewer service charges by more than 10% in any calendar year, and in no event shall any such IEUA Pass Through Treatment Charge Adjustment cause the sewer service charges to exceed the cost of providing sewer service. Prior to implementing any increase in the sewer service charges as a result of an IEUA Pass Through Treatment Cha rge Adjustment, the City shall provide written notice of the rate increase at least 30 days in advance of the effective date.

SECTION 5. Adoption of Solid Waste Service Charges . The City Council hereby adopts the solid waste service charges, to be effe ctive on the dates, in the amounts, and at the rates set forth in Exhibit “C”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

376
SECTION 6. CEQA. The City Council finds that the administration, operation, maintenance, and improvements of the City’s water, sewer, and solid waste systems, which are to be funded by the Charges, and set forth herein, are necessary to maintain service within the City’s existing water, sewer, and solid waste service areas as described herein. The City Council further finds that the administration, operation, maintenance and improvements of the City ’s water, sewer, and solid waste systems, to be funded by the Charges, will not expand the City’s water , sewer and solid waste systems. The City Council further finds that the adoption of the Charges is necessary and reasonable to fund the administration, operation, maintenance and improvements of the City’s water , sewer, and solid waste systems. Based on these findings, the City Council determines that the adoption of the Charges established by this Resolution are exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to section 21080(b)(8) of the Public Resources Code and section 15273(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines . The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings have been based are located at City of Ontario, 303 East "B" Street, Ontario, California 91764. The custodian for these records is the City Clerk of the City.

SECTION 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause or phrase in this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is for any reason held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this Resolution or the application of such provisions to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Resolution and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases or the application thereof to any person or circumstance be held invalid.

SECTION 8. Conflicts. The City is authorized to ado pt the Charges by this Resolution pursuant to Ordinance No. 3133. All prior actions of the City Council, including resolutions, ordinances, or parts thereof, that are inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby superseded by this Resolution to the extent of such inconsistency.

SECTION 9. Effective Date . This Resolution shall take effect and be in full force and effect upon its adoption.

The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of October, 2025.

_____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR

377

ATTEST:

____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

____________________________________

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP

CITY ATTORNEY

378

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )

CITY OF ONTARIO )

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK

(SEAL)

The foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2025 - duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held October 7, 2025.

_____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK

(SEAL)

379

EXHIBIT “A”

SCHEDULE OF WATER SERVICE CHARGES

Commodity Charges (Monthly Water Use):

SFR Potable Non-SFR Potable
Units* Current November 1,
2025
July 1,
2026 Units* Current November
1, 2025 July 1, 2026
Tier 1 1-10 $2.40 $2.44 $2.61 Uniform $3.07 $3.38 $3.62 Tier 2 11-18 $3.82 $4.55 $4.87
Tier 3 Above 18 $4.59 $5.39 $5.76
Recycled Water
Units* Current November 1,
2025
July 1,
2026
Uniform $2.40 $2.65 $2.91
*Water “Units” measured in HCF (One Hundred Cubic Feet = 748 gallons)

Meter Meter Pipe
Size Size Size
5/8” $30.65 $31.64 $33.86 5/8” $14.88 $15.20 $16.72 2" $11.87 $11.97 $12.80 3/4” $41.01 $42.36 $45.33 3/4” $17.20 $17.70 $19.47 3" -- $15.34 $16.41 1” $61.84 $63.81 $68.27 1” $21.85 $22.70 $24.97 4'' $22.36 $21.15 $22.63 1 1/2” $113.82 $117.42 $125.64 1 1/2” $33.46 $35.19 $38.71 6'' $46.17 $42.03 $44.97 2” $176.20 $181.75 $194.47 2” $47.40 $50.19 $55.21 8" $87.25 $78.02 $83.49 3” $373.73 $385.47 $412.45 3” $91.53 $97.67 $107.44 10" $149.03 $132.17 $141.43 4” $664.84 $685.69 $733.69 4” $156.56 $167.65 $184.41 12" $234.66 $207.23 $221.73 6” $1,361.40 $1,404.07 $1,502.35 6” $312.18 $335.09 $368.59 16" $488.93 $430.07 $460.18 8” $2,505.02 $2,583.50 $2,764.35 8” $567.67 $609.99 $670.99 10” $3,960.54 $4,084.59 $4,370.52 10” $892.93 $959.86 $1,055.85 Readiness to Serve (Base Charges):

Potable Water Recycled Water Fire Service
November
1, 2025 July 1, 2026 November
1, 2025 July 1, 2026 November
1, 2025 July 1, 2026Current CurrentCurrent
380
EXHIBIT “B”

SCHEDULE OF SEWER SERVICE CHARGES

November 1, 2025 July 1, 2026
$27.02 $29.45
$11.40 $11.76 $12.35
$1.41 $1.54 $1.62
Customer Class Monthly Rates Current
(**) HCF (One Hundred Cubic Feet) is used to measure water consumption. Non-residential customers’ sewer service charge will be calculated based on billed water usage and a 90% return-to-sewer factor.

IEUA Charge
Non-Residential per HCF **
(Proposed)
(*) EDU (Equivalent Dwelling Unit) is a term used to compare the flows generated by a single family residential unit for non-residential customers. IEUA multi-family is currently calculated at 0.7 EDU (70%).

Single Family Residential per Unit Rate per EDU* $27.02 Multi-family Residential per Unit
City Sewer Service Charges
Current November 1, 2025 July 1, 2026
381
EXHIBIT “C”

SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE SERVICE CHARGES

Gallons Current November 1,
2025
July 1,
2026 Gallons Current November 1,
2025
July 1,
2026
96 $43.81 $47.70 $51.59 96 $12.15 $14.04 $15.93
64 $39.45 $42.68 $45.91 64 $7.73 $8.96 $10.19
32 $35.60 $38.09 $40.59 32 $3.75 $4.27 $4.79
Gallons Current November 1,
2025
July 1,
2026 Gallons Current November 1,
2025
July 1,
2026
96 $7.34 $8.28 $9.23 96 $13.69 $14.02 $14.36
64 $7.00 $6.66 64 $12.24 $10.79
32 $5.81 $4.28 32 $10.55 $7.40
Automated 3-cart Set Automated Extra Refuse Cart
Automated Extra Recycling Carts Automated Extra Organic Waste Carts 32 gal 64 gal 96 gal 1.5 yd 2 yd 3 yd 4 yd 6 yd 2 yd 3 yd 4 yd 6 yd Current $16.81 $140.01 $154.23 $179.09 $213.25 $281.57 $235.71 $315.26 $404.12 $684.98 November 1, 2025 $8.48 $13.09 $18.57 $149.40 $163.25 $190.79 $222.89 $295.88 $237.86 $318.34 $404.31 $674.60 July 1, 2026 $9.08 $14.42 $20.33 $158.78 $172.28 $202.49 $232.53 $310.18 $240.02 $321.41 $404.50 $664.21 Current $12.15 $40.94 $57.75 $83.91 $119.53 $189.71 $138.21 $220.11 $311.31 $594.52 November 1, 2025 $4.27 $8.96 $14.04 $42.67 $58.56 $87.26 $120.74 $195.59 $132.49 $214.83 $302.77 $575.24 July 1, 2026 $4.79 $10.19 $15.93 $44.41 $59.37 $90.61 $121.95 $201.46 $126.76 $209.54 $294.23 $555.96 Current $23.80 $58.15 $74.07 $98.92 $133.08 $201.40 $155.54 $235.09 $323.96 $604.82 November 1, 2025 $13.43 $18.02 $22.62 $53.68 $69.80 $97.33 $129.43 $202.41 $144.40 $224.87 $310.85 $581.14 July 1, 2026 $11.31 $16.63 $22.11 $50.90 $65.52 $95.73 $125.77 $203.42 $133.25 $214.65 $297.75 $557.46 Commercial Refuse Rates
Carts Bins Compactor
Each additional pick-up per week:

Once per week service - each additonal container:

Once per week service – first container:
32 gal 64 gal 96 gal 1.5 yd 2 yd 3 yd 4 yd 6 yd 2 yd 3 yd 4 yd 6 yd Current $10.21 $98.21 $107.56 $126.27 $144.98 $193.77 $141.14 $202.46 $253.14 $386.42 November 1, 2025 $5.96 $8.84 $11.62 $113.30 $123.44 $147.40 $168.84 $226.79 $166.28 $232.58 $286.70 $446.72 July 1, 2026 $6.55 $9.74 $13.03 $128.40 $139.32 $168.54 $192.71 $259.80 $191.43 $262.70 $320.27 $507.01 Current $7.34 $38.46 $49.79 $71.96 $94.30 $153.85 $97.76 $161.42 $214.45 $350.07 November 1, 2025 $2.49 $5.46 $8.28 $39.55 $51.31 $77.88 $102.15 $167.89 $103.75 $171.90 $228.00 $390.20 July 1, 2026 $2.62 $5.89 $9.23 $40.65 $52.83 $83.80 $110.00 $181.92 $109.74 $182.39 $241.56 $430.32 Current $18.98 $55.67 $66.11 $86.97 $107.84 $165.54 $115.09 $176.41 $227.09 $360.37 November 1, 2025 $11.64 $14.53 $17.30 $48.66 $58.73 $87.95 $110.83 $174.71 $115.66 $181.95 $236.08 $396.09 July 1, 2026 $9.14 $12.34 $15.62 $47.70 $58.98 $88.92 $113.82 $183.88 $116.23 $187.50 $245.07 $431.81 Commercial Recycling Rates
Carts Bins
Once per week service - each additonal container:

Compactor
Once per week service – first container:

Each additional pick-up per week:
382

32 gal 64 gal 96 gal 1.5 yd 2 yd 3 yd 4 yd 6 yd
Current $16.72 $109.27 $122.66 $149.45 $176.24 $229.82
November 1, 2025 $7.87 $12.47 $17.47 $131.98 $156.04 $190.45 $225.00 $293.67 July 1, 2026 $8.26 $13.06 $18.21 $154.69 $189.42 $231.44 $273.76 $357.52 Current
November 1, 2025 $4.30 $8.99 $14.02 $49.46 $74.14 $109.41 $144.51 $214.34 July 1, 2026 $4.28 $9.16 $14.36 $54.96 $90.45 $133.35 $176.56 $261.83 Current
November 1, 2025 $13.46 $18.05 $23.05 $62.91 $86.98 $121.38 $155.94 $224.61 July 1, 2026 $10.80 $15.60 $20.75 $62.67 $97.40 $139.43 $181.75 $265.51 Once per week service – first container:

Once per week service - each additonal container:

Each additional pick-up per week:

Commercial Green Rates
Carts Bins
32 gal 64 gal 96 gal 1.5 yd 2 yd 3 yd 1.5 yd 2 yd 3 yd
Current $9.96 $16.82 $24.14 $292.06 $302.23 $322.57
November 1, 2025 $7.47 $11.81 $16.39 $176.93 $224.03 $282.64 $282.64 $341.63 $458.47 July 1, 2026 $8.06 $12.73 $17.67 $190.76 $241.54 $304.73 $304.73 $368.33 $494.31 Current $6.80 $13.76 $21.11 $100.57 $132.60 $196.18
November 1, 2025 $3.68 $8.07 $12.70 $75.80 $123.68 $183.07 $181.51 $241.28 $358.90 July 1, 2026 $3.80 $8.33 $13.12 $78.26 $127.69 $189.01 $187.40 $249.12 $370.56 Current $18.59 $25.44 $32.76 $117.78 $148.92 $211.90
November 1, 2025 $7.05 $11.38 $15.96 $77.51 $124.60 $183.21 $183.21 $242.20 $359.05 July 1, 2026 $7.59 $12.27 $17.21 $83.57 $134.34 $197.54 $197.54 $261.14 $387.11 Commercial Organic Rates
Carts Bins Compactor
Once per week service – first container:

Once per week service - each additonal container:

Each additional pick-up per week:

Current November 1,
2025 July 1, 2026
$247.61 $308.45 $369.29
$247.61 $308.45 $369.29
$247.61 $308.45 $369.29
$247.61 $308.45 $369.29
$247.61 $308.45 $369.29
$247.61 $308.45 $369.29
$283.68 $352.16 $420.63
$247.61 $308.45 $369.29
10 YD - Refuse
Roll-Off Containers
Dry Run/Other Haul Charge
Compactor
Recyling per load
40 YD - Refuse
30 YD - Refuse
20 YD - Refuse
Inert/Green Waste per Load
383

Ontario City CouncilOctober 7, 2025

Ontario City Council
October 7, 2025