Agenda packet — Ontario City Council, April 7, 2026 (part 2 of 3)

Exhibit A
241
BB&K (2024) 1 AMENDMENT TO NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414
PAUL S. LEON
MAYOR
ALAN D. WAPNER

MAYOR PRO TEM
JIM W. BOWMAN

DEBRA PORADA

DAISY MACIAS

COUNCIL MEMBERS

SHEILA MAUTZ

CITY CLERK
JAMES R. MILHISER

CITY TREASURER

SCOTT OCHOA

CITY MANAGER
AMENDMENT NO. 2

TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO AND
AKM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.

1. Parties and Date.

This Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (as defined herein) is made and entered as of ____________, by and between the City of Ontario (“City”) and AKM Consulting Engineers, Inc., a California Corporation, “Consultant”. City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

2. Recitals.

2.1 Agreement. The City and Consultant have entered into an agreement entitled “OnCall Project Management Services” dated June 4, 2024 (“Agreement”).

2.2 Amendment Purpose. The City and Consultant desire to amend this Agreement to increase the compensation by One Million One Hundred Sixteen Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty-Two Dollars ($1,116,752) for a total-not-to-exceed compensation of Two Million Two Hundred Fifty-Three Thousand Five Hundred Thirty Dollars ($2,253,530) and extend the term of the Agreement from June 4, 2024 to June 4, 2029. This increase in compensation and extension of the Agreement expiration date is for an additional project-specific proposal to the Exhibit A through Exhibit B. This increase in compensation is for the additional scope of work listed in the attached Consultants’ Proposal titled “Professional Project Management, Construction Management, and Inspection Services for the OMUC Project No. UT1084 On-Site Sodium Hypochlorite Generation (OSG) – Phase I” and dated December 19, 2025. Parties have entered into that Amendment No. 1 dated March 31, 2025.

2.3 Amendment Authority. This Amendment No. 2 is authorized pursuant to Section

3.1.2 and 3.2.4 of the Agreement.

3. Terms.
242
BB&K (2024) 2 AGREEMENT FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414
Agreement are hereby amended in their entirety to read as follows:

3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from June 4, 2024 to June 4, 2029, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. The Parties may, by mutual, written consent, extend the term of this Agreement if necessary to complete the Services.

3.2.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed Two Million Two Hundred Fifty-Three Thousand Five Hundred Thirty Dollars ($2,253,530) without written approval of the City Council or City Manager, as applicable. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.

Exhibit “A” - SCOPE OF SERVICES is hereby amended to add Attachment A which is hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All other previously added or deleted scope of services are retained in their entirety.

Exhibit “B” – SCHEDULE OF SERVICES is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with Attachment B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

3.2 Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 2, all other provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment No. 2. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 2, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment No. 2.

3.3 Adequate Consideration. The Parties hereto irrevocably stipulate and agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the performance of the obligations they have undertaken pursuant to this Amendment No. 2.

3.4 Severability. If any portion of this Amendment No. 2 is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.5 Integration. This Amendment represents the entirety of the Parties’ understanding relating to the subject of this Amendment, including written or verbal communications between the Parties, which shall have no relevance unless expressly incorporated herein. This is an integrated amendment.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

3.1 Amendment. Sections 3.1.2 and 3.2.1, Exhibit A through Exhibit C of the 243
BB&K (2024) 3 AGREEMENT FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414
SIGNATURE PAGE FOR AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO

AND AKM CONSULTING ENGINEERS
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Amendment No. 2 as of the day and year first above written.

CITY OF ONTARIO AKM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.

By:

Its:

Printed Name:

By:

Its:

Printed Name:
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND Secretary
OR Treasurer REQUIRED]
Approved By:

Scott Ochoa
City Manager
Approved as to Form:
_____________________________________
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
Attested By:

City Clerk
244
Exhibit A

EXHIBIT A
Scope of Services
Project Management, Construction Management & Inspection Services (Owner’s Representative Services)
for
OMUC Project No. UT 1084 On-Site Sodium Hypochlorite Generation (OSG) – Phase I General Project Description:

The City of Ontario’s Municipal Utilities Company (OMUC) is implementing a design-build water system capital improvement project to design and construct new on-site sodium hypochlorite generation (OSG) facilities at Well Sites No. 24, 30, 35, 36 & 38. To facilitate the successful execution of the project, OMUC is seeking a qualified individual or firm (Consultant) to provide owner’s representative services to manage the project with OMUC staff. These Owner’s Representative Services will include, but are not limited, to project management, constructability review, construction inspection, quality assurance and quality control services during all phases of design, construction and post-construction as explained in the design-build project’s RFP and this RFP for Owner’s Representative Services.

The design-build project includes the construction of five (5) new concrete masonry unit (CMU) buildings, new OSG equipment, new mechanical, electrical, plumbing and instrumentation control piping and connections with the existing well sites, and SCADA integration. The project will require demolishing, removing, disposing, and salvaging parts of the existing OSG buildings, equipment, systems, and other site components required to construct and integrate the new facilities with the existing improvements to remain. The Owner Representative team shall work with the City and the awarded prequalified Design-Build (DB) team to ensure the construction sequence does not impact the City’s water productions capabilities to maintain continuous operations of the well sites during construction.

All work will be performed during the day between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding recognized holidays.

The contract time for the Project is 28 calendar months.

The Project will close bids on December 19, 2025, and the Design-Build Contract is anticipated to be awarded during the City Council Meeting on April 7, 2026.

List of Prequalified Design Build Teams:

1. Covenant Technical Solutions / PACE

2. Innovative Construction Solutions / N2W

3. Myers and Sons Construction, LLC/ Ardurra Group

4. Pacific Hydrotech Corporation/ N2W

5. RC Foster Corporation/ Webb Associates
The project is a prevailing wage project.

Please retrieve and review the Design-Build RFP using the information below:

RFP - UT1084 OSG.pdf
245
BB&K (2024) 4 AGREEMENT FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414
Attachment A
Exhibit “A” - SCOPE OF SERVICES
246
Exhibit A

1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:

1.1 Basic Services. Consultant agrees to perform all the necessary professional, administrative, and any other necessary construction management services mutually agreeable to the parties for the Project in a timely and professional manner, consistent with the standards of the profession, including those provided for herein.

1.2 Exclusions from Basic Services. “N/A”, NOT APPLICABLE.

1.3 Additional Services. “N/A”, NOT APPLICABLE.

1.4 Communication with City. Consultant will participate in consultations and conferences with authorized representatives of City and/or other local, regional, or State agencies concerned with the Project, which may be necessary for the completion of the Project or the development of documents in accordance with the applicable standards and requirements of law and the City. Such consultations and conferences will continue throughout the planning and development of the Project. Consultant will take direction only from the City’s Representative, or any other representative specifically designated by the City for this Project.

1.5 Weekly Project Check-ins. Consultant shall conduct weekly progress meetings and other special technical meetings throughout the project. Consultant will prepare the agenda, describing key issues, schedule status, and potential change orders, and distribute notes to meeting participants.

1.6 Meeting Agendas and Minutes with Action Items. See description for “Weekly Project Check-ins” and task descriptions provided herein.

1.7 Monthly Billings. Invoices will include, at a minimum, budget for each task or sub-task, number of hours spent with hourly rate by labor classification during the month and cumulative total for the project for each task. In addition, the monthly invoices will identify indirect and other project related costs incurred during the month. Consultant will provide to the City’s Project Manager one (1) electronic copy (smart pdf).

1.8 Monthly Billing Status Reports. A Monthly Billing Status Report will be submitted with the Monthly Billing Invoice, which includes: summary of work completed and review of work status relative to the budget. Any divergence between work completed and budget expended needs to be specifically explained.

1.9 Updated Project Schedule. “N/A”, NOT APPLICABLE.

1.10 Updated Project Budget. “N/A”, NOT APPLICABLE.

1.11 Pre-Construction Meeting: Consultant will attend the Project Pre-Construction meeting.

1.12 Decision Log: Consultant shall maintain a decision log for unanticipated project events that require actions or decisions from any of the parties associated with the Project. At minimum, the Decision Log shall contain columns for an ID number of each issue, category, description and impact of the issue and decision, responsible party, decision date, completion status, and comments.
247
Exhibit A

1.13 Format of Deliverables: Consultant will submit all original documents in one or more of the followings formats as directed to by the City: MS Word, MS Excel, MS Project, MS Power Point, PDF, AutoCAD, Arc GIS.

1.14 Coordination and Cooperation. The City may contract out testing, inspection, and construction engineering services to perform select Project services on its behalf. If the City does so, it will provide a copy of these separate agreements to the Consultant so they will be fully aware of the other’s duties and responsibilities. The Construction Management Consultant will cooperate with the other City staff and consultants and respond to any requests or directives authorized by the City to be made or given by the Construction Manager. Consultant will request clarification from the City in writing if the Consultant should have any questions regarding the authority of the Construction Manager.

1.15 Additional Role and Responsibilities. Consultant shall review Article 13 “OR’S ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES” in the attached RFP - UT1084 OSG for clarification regarding project-specific responsibilities.

Owner Representative Services:

General Assumptions:
• To date, a Preliminary Design Report, 90% Plans and Specifications (not for construction), Updated Conceptual Site Layout (recommended by OMUC Staff) and Updated City SCADA Requirements have been completed for the project (please refer to the design-build RFP’s Appendix A). The project is anticipated to be a categorically exempt CEQA project. The City estimates the DB Teams contract to not exceed eight million dollars ($8,000,000). The Owner has already pre-purchased most of the OSG equipment (please refer to the design-build RFP’s Appendix B) and the anticipated equipment delivery date is January 2026. • Consultant will provide project management services including, but not limited to, management of documentation, pre-construction site photos and videos, responding to submittals and RFIs, daily progress reports, progress payments, change orders, claim mitigation efforts, inspections and commissioning scheduling, and design and construction progress meetings. • Consultant will provide a full-time inspection services during the construction and commissioning phases to ensure continuous monitoring and clear field communication for the project between Owner, Owner Rep, and Design-Build Team. • Consultant, with the assistance of the OMUC’s Project Manager and Operational Staff, will generate a punch list to complete missing and/or correction items to ensure full compliance with the contract documents.

Phase 1. Design/Development (DD) and Construction Document (CD) Item 1.1 Project Review and Kick-Off Meeting
• Consultant shall meet with the Owner to fully understand the program, the design documents, schedule, and logistics, the project scope, and documents pertinent to administering the construction of the project. Consultant shall become an integral part of the Project team that will advise on the development and progress of the design and construction process on behalf of the Owner.
248
Exhibit A
• Consultant will prepare for and attend a kick-off meeting with all members of the Project Team including the Owner, Builder and all other stakeholders. Consultant will prepare a meeting agenda, facilitate the meeting, and prepare meeting minutes and distribution of minutes to all attendees for their review and acceptance.

Item 1.2 Document Control Procedures and Coordination
• Consultant will establish a working relationship with the City staff in order to implement procedures for the efficient processing and management of all project documents. Preliminary work items will be identified and coordinated at this time including discussions regarding permits, or other documents required by the Builder for the contract work. • Consultant shall review the drawings and specifications as they are being prepared, recommending alternative solutions (value engineering) whenever design details affect costs, construction feasibility, or schedules. Recommendations for alternative solutions will be submitted to Owner and the Builder for review and approval. Direction on incorporation of alternative solutions will be made by Owner.
• Consultant shall notify Owner and the Builder in writing upon observing any features in the drawings or specifications, which appear to be ambiguous, confusing, conflicting, or erroneous.

Ambiguous, confusing, conflicting, or erroneous features discovered in the drawings or specifications by the Consultant during the review process will be resolved with the Builder.

Item 1.3 Project Management During Design
• Consultant shall be the point of contact for the project team. Consultant will provide direction to the Builder, and all other associated outsourced project participants. Consultant will monitor the progress of the project and is responsible for compiling status and financial reports and all required documentation. This will include tracking, documenting, and communicating outstanding issues and risks for the project to ensure timely decisions are made by project team members to support the schedule, budget, and needs of the project. Consultant will provide ongoing review, tracking, and oversight of the approved work of the Builder and assist the Owner in both project management and technical matters. Consultant shall attend regularly scheduled meetings with the Project Team during the development of the design to advise them on matters relating to site use, improvements, selection of materials, building methods, construction details, building systems and equipment. • Design meetings are to be attended by the Consultant. In addition, there will be other special work sessions related to specific issues that are identified during the design phase, such as meetings with the permitting authorities, Design Submittal Review meetings, and internal work sessions with the Design Team which the Consultant is expected to attend. The intensity of such meetings will be higher in the earlier phases of the design.

Item 1.4 Project Schedule
• In collaboration with the Builder, the Consultant is to establish a detailed schedule for use during the DD phase with the concurrence of Critical Path Method (CPM). Consultant is responsible for monitoring this schedule during the design phase, ensure that this schedule is maintained, and advise Owner of any deficiencies in adhering to this schedule by any party. The master schedule shall be updated monthly.
• Consultant shall provide Owner with the format for the CPM schedule for the design and construction phases of the project. This schedule will be reviewed for compliance with overall project completion requirements relative to Owner programming needs. The project schedule shall be sufficiently detailed to allow for a realistic projection of design, procurement, and construction activity sequences and durations. Updated schedules are required with each major design document submission and with major value engineering decisions; these schedules are due to Owner after 249
Exhibit A
each design submission or value engineering decision. This CPM schedule shall include a projection of all design and construction phase activities to include Consultant staff loading throughout the design/construction phases of the project. It is intended that this CPM schedule will be utilized throughout the design and construction of this project. The CM may also be asked to develop schedules related to construction sequencing options. • The scheduling software shall be capable of producing logic developed network reports, Gantt chart format reports and the software shall not be proprietary to the Consultant. Primavera or Microsoft Project are both acceptable software.

Item 1.5 Constructability Review
• During the design phase, the Consultant shall review the design documents with each design submittal and provide any comments on any items on the documents on which the Consultant has coordination questions or comments. Owner expects the Consultant to submit written comments at each design submittal.
• Consultant is expected to view the design from the constructability perspective throughout the design phases inclusive of construction phasing and sequencing options, if any. On each issue, the Consultant is to do the following on a timely basis within the design schedule: describe the constructability issue with background information; conduct in-depth study/research; and, prepare a written report inclusive of Consultant’s recommendation for addressing the issue, as well as the basis for the recommendation.
• Constructability reviews/studies are also to be conducted as requested by Owner and with each design submittal (e.g., 100% DD, 50% CD, 95% CD), along with a back-check at 100% CD documents.

Item 1.6 Construction Document Finalization
• During final preparation of construction documents, Consultant, in coordination with the City’s Project Manager, will:
o Coordinate finalization of technical specifications and drawings to the point where Builder can complete construction of the project in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents.
o Obtain all pre-construction/pre-permit approvals required from any authority having jurisdiction over any portion of this project.

Item 1.7 Project Schedule of Value Finalization
• In cooperation with the Builder, the Consultant shall assist Owner with the final evaluation of the Builder and their subcontractors’ schedule of values for the project’s various scope divisions for completeness, full responsiveness, and price, including alternate value engineering prices and unit prices (as applicable).
• Consultant will make a formal report to Owner regarding the recommended finalized schedule of value for the project.
• In the event that the Builder and/or their subcontractors’ bids can not create a complete and responsive schedule of values, the Consultant will assist the Builder with revising their scope to meet the finalized Construction Document requirements to reduce the construction costs for the Project.

Phase 2. Construction
Item 2.1 Pre-Construction Meeting
250
Exhibit A
• Consultant will prepare for and attend a Pre-Construction meeting with the Builder and all stakeholders including City staff and utility representatives. Consultant will prepare a meeting agenda, facilitate the meeting, and prepare meeting minutes and distribution of minutes to all attendees for their review and acceptance.

Item 2.2 Scheduling and Progress Meetings
• Consultant will coordinate, review, and approve the Builder’s proposed schedule for the completion of the project. Consultant will also review the Builder ‘s baseline schedule and weekly look-ahead schedules for conformance with the master schedule and contract documents. Consultant shall be proactive in identifying potential schedule delays and bring up to the City’s Project Manager as soon as possible. Consultant shall work with City staff and the Builder to mitigate/minimize such delays when feasible, which includes issuing the Builder notices of non-compliance. • Consultant will prepare and distribute Weekly Statement of Working Day reports in order to maintain an accurate and current record of contract time.

Item 2.3 Weekly Owner Representative Report
• Consultant will provide weekly reports to the City’s Project Manager, which at a minimum will include detailed work completed during the previous week, current schedule, potential field issues that may lead to a contract change orders, and project expenditure to date.

Item 2.4 Project Records
• Consultant will establish and implement procedures for review and processing of all project documentation to assure that records are organized, complete, and will allow for ease of document retrieval. Consultant will develop and implement a web-based information management program for the Project and provide the Owner with continuous unrestricted access to all Project information. This system will need approval by the City’s Project Manager. • At the completion of the Project, deliver all records to Owner and Builder may review the record drawings, after which the record drawings shall be delivered to Owner for final sign off.

Item 2.5 Submittal Management
• Consultant will review submittals and coordinate with the Builder’s Engineer of Record as necessary. Once the Consultant and the Engineer of Record recommend a submittal for approval, Consultant shall submit to the City for their final review and approval prior to notifying the Builder’s Contractor. Consultant will maintain the submittal log and records.

Item 2.6 Requests for Information (RFIs)
• Consultant will provide timely RFI review, which will include coordination with Builder, Owner and required stakeholders. Consultant will provide a clear and concise written response to the Builder. Consultant will maintain the RFI log and records.

Item 2.7 On-Site Construction Management & Coordination • During observation and monitoring of the quality of the construction work, Consultant, in coordination with the City’s Inspector, will:
o Coordinate with OMUC’s Project Manager, City Staff and OMUC’s Operations division on the construction of the project.
o Maintain on-site project reports for inspections, observations, and construction activities.

Reports shall contain a record of weather, work on-site, equipment on-site, number of 251
Exhibit A
workers, work accomplished, problems encountered, solutions agreed upon, and other similar relevant data as may be required.
o Maintain photo and video record of construction progress. o Monitor construction activities to see that all elements of project are furnished, installed, and constructed per contract documents. Prepare any required notices of nonconformance when materials, construction installation processes, or quality of work do not meet the requirements of the contract. Notices will be issued to the Builder stating the nature of the deviation and requiring the Builder to perform corrective action. All non-compliance issues will be documented with photographs and in writing. o Monitor Builder compliance with construction permits, traffic and pedestrian control plans, and environmental compliance. Consultant will coordinate with the Builder and Inspector/Observer for compliance and will recommend a course of action to OMUC if required measures are not being met by the Builder.
o File appropriate reports.
o Oversee and coordinate quality assurance testing in accordance with the contract documents. City will retain the services of a geotechnical engineering firm to perform soil compaction testing.
o Perform inspections and coordinate any necessary special inspections required for the project.
o Monitor Builder’s work and recommend any special testing as needed. o Review storm water BMP’s for compliance with approved SWPPP/WPCP/SWMP. o Coordinate with local residents, schools, and businesses for public outreach, such as, trash pickup and notice of street closures, geotechnical testing scheduling, and etc.

Item 2.8 Full-Time Inspection Services
• Consultant will provide full-time inspection services for the City. Coordination will be necessary with the City’s Project Manager and City’s Operation Staff.

Consultant to anticipate providing the following services:
o Provide full-time inspection services during the construction phase of the project and coordinate with City Staff.
o Daily field inspection and the preparation of daily construction inspection reports. o Verify compliance with plans and specifications.
o Coordination with City of Ontario staff
• Consultant’s inspector(s) will have a minimum of 10 years of inspection experience, worked on 3 relatable projects and be experts in mechanical, electrical (high and low voltage) and plumbing (MEP) inspections. Consultant may use multiple inspectors to fulfill this requirement.

Item 2.9 Safety Program and Traffic Control Plan
• Consultant will monitor the Builder‘s on-site safety program against Cal-OSHA Construction Safety Orders. Consultant will work closely with the City Staff and the Builder so that all traffic control and trenching requirements for the project are always met and maintained. In the instance where the Builder does not take immediate measures to correct observed safety deficiencies, the Consultant will immediately notify City Staff and make recommendations on an appropriate course of action.

Item 2.10 Schedule of Values and Progress Pay Estimates • Consultant will evaluate the Builder’s schedule of values and pay applications. Consultant will verify that the quantities claimed are true and accurate through the use of field measurements, materials tickets, extra work reports, and visual confirmation, and as verified by the project’s 252
Exhibit A
inspection staff. Consultant will prepare quantity calculation sheets for each bid item for inclusion in the project records or verify against any submitted schedule of values.

Item 2.11 Change Order Management
• Consultant will negotiate and coordinate the implementation of contract change orders during the construction process. Consultant will compile change order supporting documentation on City forms, such as inspection reports, test reports, drawings, sketches, photographs, and other materials as required. Consultant will review and evaluate the appropriateness of all proposed change orders; advise the City as to their effect on the contract time and cost; and perform independent estimates of the proposed change order work when necessary, as well as recommend approval or denial with approval by the City. City will have final decision on approval of change orders.

Item 2.12 Claims Management
• Consultant will maintain a potential claims log. Consultant will prepare a file for each potential claim issue submitted by the Builder against the Owner for any alleged cause (cost, time, etc..).

Consultant will evaluate, analyze, and coordinate negotiation to achieve claims and dispute resolutions in line with legal precedents, statutes, or procedures for handling claims and the Owner’s directions. Consultant shall be proactive in identifying potential claims and bring up to the City’s Project Manager as soon as possible. Consultant shall work with Owner and Builder to mitigate and/or minimize such claims when feasible, which includes issuing the Builder notices of non-compliance.

Phase 3. Project Close-out and Post Construction Services Item 3.1 Punch List
• Consultant, with the assistance of the Owner’s staff, will generate a list of incomplete or unsatisfactory items ("Punch List"), for completion by the Builder. Notify the Builder when the Project or a designated portion thereof is complete. Prepare a summary of the status of the work, listing changes in the previously issued Punch‐list and recommending the times within which the Builder shall complete the uncompleted items on the Punch‐list to ensure full compliance with the Contract Documents.

Item 3.2 Coordinate Close-Out and Submittal of Final Documents • Consultant will monitor the Builder’s and subcontractor’s progress to finalize and submit all project records and documents. Consultant will obtain and review all record drawings, contract required documents, lien releases, written warranties and forward to the City’s Project Manager for final archive filing purposes. Consultant will coordinate directly with Builder in the preparation of digital record drawings and provide the City with final PDF files for review.

Item 3.3 Final Payment
• Consultant will evaluate Builder’s final payment application, resolve any outstanding matters, and provide approval and recommendation for final payment.
253
BB&K (2024) 5 AGREEMENT FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414
Attachment B
Exhibit “B” – Schedule of Services
The services shall be completed within the durations specified below, which beginning ten (10) calendar days after Notice to Proceed is issued:
254
AKM Prop. 25
-1071 Scope of Work 6
255
AKM Prop. 25
-1071 Scope of Work 7
256
BB&K (2024) 6 AGREEMENT FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414
Attachment C
Exhibit “C” – Compensation
Amendment
Number
Project Title Not to Exceed Fee

0.0 D&C22-019 On-Call Construction Management and
Inspection Services
$600,000

1.0 UT 1067, 1070, 1077 – Laurel Avenue Sewer Main
Improvements, Nocta Street Sewer Main Improvements, and Nocta Street Private Sewer Lateral Improvements
$536,778

2.0 UT1084 – On-Site Sodium Hypochlorite Generation (OSG) – Phase I
$1,116,752
Grand Total $2,253,530
257
Project
Manager Construction Manager Lead Inspector
Electrical
Inspector Total Hours Labor Total Total Cost
$253.00 $206.00 $178.00 $178

1.1 Project Review and Kick-off Meeting 16 4 4 4 28 $6,296 $6,2961.2 Document Control Procedures and Coordination 24 8 32 $7,720 $20,000 $27,7201.3 Project Management During Design 280 60 340 $83,200 $83,2001.4 Project Schedule 80 40 120 $28,480 $28,4801.5 Constructability Review 48 120 16 32 184 $45,408 $45,4081.6 Construction Documentation Finalization 24 40 64 $14,312 $14,3121.7 Project Schedule of Value Finalization 8 40 48 $10,264 $10,264 480 312 20 36 816 $195,680 $20,000 $215,680

2.1 Pre-Construction Meeting 4 16 20 $4,308 $4,308

2.2 Scheduling and Progress Meetings 40 208 248 $52,968 $52,9682.3 Weekly Owner Representative Report 64 48 112 $26,080 $26,080

2.4 Project Records 16 120 136 $28,768 $28,7682.5 Submittal Management 48 120 168 $36,864 $36,8642.6 Request for Information (RFI) 32 80 112 $24,576 $24,5762.7 On-Site Construction Management and Coordination 16 120 136 $28,768 $28,7682.8 Full Time Inspection Services 48 2480 496 2528 $539,616 $15,000 $554,6162.9 Safety Program and Traffic Control Plan 40 40 $8,240 $8,240

2.10 Schedule of Values and Progress Pay Estimates 24 140 164 $34,912 $34,9122.11 Change Order Management 80 120 200 $44,960 $44,960

2.12 Claims Management 40 80 120 $26,600 $26,600
364 1140 2480 496 3984 $856,660 $15,000 $871,660

3.1 Punch List 8 16 40 20 84 $16,000 $16,0003.2 Coordinate Close-Out and Submittal of Final Documents 8 24 8 4 44 $9,104 $9,1043.3 Final Payment 4 16 20 $4,308 $4,308 20 56 48 24 148 $29,412 $0 $29,412
864 1508 2548 $556 4948
$218,592 $310,648 $453,544 $98,968 $1,081,752 $35,000 $1,116,752 Phase 1 - Design/Development (DD) and Construction Document (CD) On-Site Sodium Hypochlorite Generation (OSG) Phase 1 (UT1084) Project Management, Construction Management, Inspection Services City of Ontario - Ontario Municipal Utilities Company
Proposal - December 19, 2025
Task No. Description
Labor Hours and Rates by Classification Fees
Expenses
Total Fee Total Hours SUBTOTALSUBTOTALSUBTOTALPhase 2 - ConstructionPhase 3 - Project Close-Out and Post Construction Services 258
AKM Prop. 25-1071 Fee 1
Contract. UT1084

4. Fee
To complete the proposed scope of services, we estimate the following budget will be required. Work will be performed on a time and material, not to exceed basis, in accordance with AKM’s rate schedule established as part of OMUC On-Call Construction Management contract, included in this section.

AKM CONSULTING ENGINEERS - RATE SCHEDULE
Labor Classification
Hourly
Rate
Hourly
Rate
Hourly
Rate
2024 2025 2026
Principal $253 $261 $269
Principal Engineer $253 $261 $269
Project Manager $246 $253 $261
Project Engineer $234 $241 $248
Senior Construction Manager $233 $240 $247
QA/QC Manager $233 $240 $247
Senior Engineer $215 $221 $228
Construction Manager $200 $206 $212
Senior Field Engineer / Inspector $197 $203 $209
Field Engineer / Inspector $173 $178 $184
Associate Engineer $167 $172 $177
Staff Engineer $148 $153 $157
Financial Analyst $136 $140 $144
Senior Designer / Senior CADD Technician $117 $121 $124 Designer / CADD Technician $109 $112 $115
Assistant Engineer $107 $111 $114
Engineering Technician $99 $102 $105
Engineering Aide $84 $86 $89
Office Support $84 $86 $89
Data or Word Processing $81 $84 $86
Out-of-pocket expenses (blueprinting, reproduction and printing, delivery, etc.) will be invoiced at cost plus 10%.

Subcontracted services will be marked up 10% in order to cover costs associated with administration, coordination and management of subcontractors. Mileage will be invoiced at $0.75/mile. This schedule of rates is in effect until December 31, 2028, at which time it may be adjusted.
259
SECTION 00500

CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made this _____ day of _________, 20__, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, by and between the City of Ontario, hereinafter called City, and Pacific Hydrotech Corporation, hereinafter called Contractor. The City and the Contractor for the considerations stated herein agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SCOPE OF WORK. The Contractor shall perform all Work within the time stipulated the Contract and shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, tools, utility services, and transportation to complete all of the Work required in strict compliance with the Contract Documents as specified in Article 5 below for the following Project:

ON-SITE SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE GENERATION (OSG) – PHASE I, OMUC CONTRACT NO. 1084
The Contractor and its surety shall be liable to the City for any damages arising as a result of the Contractor’s failure to comply with this obligation.

ARTICLE 2. TIME FOR COMPLETION. Time is of the essence in the performance of the Work.

The Work shall be commenced on the date stated in the City’s Notice to Proceed. The Contractor shall complete all Work required by the Contract Documents within 854 calendar days from the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed, herein after the Contract Time. By its signature hereunder, Contractor agrees the Contract Time for completion set forth above is adequate and reasonable to complete the Work.

ARTICLE 3. CONTRACT PRICE. The City shall pay to the Contractor as full compensation for the performance of the Contract, subject to any additions or deductions as provided in the Contract Documents, and including all applicable taxes and costs, the sum of Seven Million, Seven Hundred Forty Six Thousand, Nine Hundred Dollars ($7,746,900), hereinafter the Contract Price. Payment shall be made as set forth in the General Conditions.

ARTICLE 4. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. The Contractor acknowledges that the City will sustain actual damages for each and every day completion of the Project is delayed beyond the Contract Time. Because of the nature of the Project, it would be impracticable or extremely difficult to determine the City’s actual damages. Accordingly, as provided in Government Code section 53069.85, it is agreed that the Contractor will pay the City the sum of $5,000 for each and every calendar day of delay in completing the Work beyond the time prescribed in the Contract PAUL S. LEON
MAYOR
ALAN D. WAPNER

MAYOR PRO TEM
JIM W. BOWMAN

DEBRA PORADA

DAISY MACIAS

COUNCIL MEMBERS

SHEILA MAUTZ

CITY CLERK
JAMES R. MILHISER

CITY TREASURER

SCOTT OCHOA

CITY MANAGER
260
46700.00100\33349674.4
(BB&K 10/2020
-2-
Documents for finishing the Work, as Liquidated Damages and not as a penalty or forfeiture. In the event the Liquidated Damages are not paid, the Contractor agrees the City may deduct that amount from any money due or that may become due the Contractor under the Contract. This Article does not affect the City’s rights to other damages or remedies specified in the Contract Documents or allowed by law.

Should Contractor be inexcusably delayed in the performance of the Work, City may deduct Liquidated Damages based on its estimate of when Contractor will achieve Final Completion or other milestones. City need not wait until Final Completion to withhold Liquidated Damages from Contractor.

Liquidated Damages are not a penalty but an agreed upon estimate of the actual damages that would be sustained by the City for delay, including but not limited to loss of revenue, inconvenience to the City and the public, and increased Project administration expenses, such as extra inspection, construction management, staff time and architectural and engineering expenses. Liquidated Damages do not include actual damages the City incurs on account of claims by third parties against the City on account of any delay.

Should money due or to become due to the Contractor be insufficient to cover Liquidated Damages or other offsets due, then Contractor forthwith shall pay the remainder of the assessed liquidated damages to City.

ARTICLE 5. COMPONENT PARTS OF THE CONTRACT. The “Contract Documents” include the following documents, each of which is incorporated into this Contract by reference:

Request for Proposal and Design-Build Administrative Specifications City Forms including:
1) Form 01, Proposal Acknowledgement and Signatures
2) Form 02, Proposer’s General Information
3) Form 03, Non-Coollusion Declaration
4) Form 04, Iran Contracting Act Certification
5) Form 05, DIR Registration Certification
6) Form 06, Workers’ Compensation Certification
Schedule of Fees
Project Development and Construction Schedule
Proposal Guarantee
Performance Bond
Payment (Labor and Materials) Bond
Contract for Construction
Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Greenbook), latest edition, except Sections 1-9
Request for Proposal and Design-Build Administrative Specifications Performance Plans and Specifications (Bridging Documents) Material List of all City Pre-Purchased Goods & Equipment Addenda
Approved Construction Plans and Specifications
Approved and fully executed Change Orders
Any other documents contained in or incorporated into the Contract 261
46700.00100\33349674.4
(BB&K 10/2020
-3-
The Contactor shall complete the Work in strict accordance with all of the Contract Documents.

All of the Contract Documents are intended to be complementary. Work required by one of the Contract Documents and not by others shall be done as if required by all. This Contract shall supersede any prior agreement of the parties.

ARTICLE 6. PROVISIONS REQUIRED BY LAW. Each and every provision of law required to be included in these Contract Documents shall be deemed to be included in these Contract Documents. The Contractor shall comply with all requirements of applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations, including but not limited to, the provisions of the California Labor Code and Public Contract Code applicable to this Project.

ARTICLE 7. INDEMNIFICATION. Contractor shall provide indemnification as set forth in the General Conditions.

ARTICLE 8. PREVAILING WAGES. Contractor shall be required to pay the prevailing rate of wages in accordance with the Labor Code which such rates shall be made available at the office of the City Clerk or may be obtained online at http//www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr. and which must be posted at the job site.

ARTICLE 9. CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION AND LABOR COMPLIANCE. Pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, all contractors and subcontractors that wish to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, or enter into a contract to perform public work must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. No bid will be accepted nor any contract entered into without proof of the contractor’s and subcontractors’ current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations to perform public work. This Project will be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the contractor registration requirements mandated by Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1.

This Project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be the Contractor’s sole responsibility to evaluate and pay the cost of complying with all labor compliance requirements under this Contract and applicable law.

ARTICLE 10. FALSE CLAIMS. Contractor acknowledges that if a false claim is submitted to the City, it may be considered fraud and Contractor may be subject to criminal prosecution.

Contractor acknowledges that the False Claims Act, California Government Code sections 12650, et seq., provides for civil penalties where a person knowingly submits a false claim to a public entity. These provisions include within their scope false claims made with deliberate ignorance of the false information or in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information. In the event the City seeks to recover penalties pursuant to the False Claims Act, it is entitled to recover its litigation costs, including attorneys’ fees. Contractor hereby acknowledges that the filing of a false claim may the Contractor to an administrative debarment proceeding wherein Contractor may be prevented from further bidding on public contracts for a period of up to five (5) years. [REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]
262
46700.00100\33349674.4
(BB&K 10/2020
-4-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Contract has been duly executed by the above-named parties, on the day and year above written.

CITY OF ONTARIO
By:

Scott Ochoa
City Manager
ATTEST:

By:

Sheila Mautz, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney

PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORATION
[IF CORPORATION, TWO SIGNATURES,

PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT AND
SECRETARY OR TREASURER REQUIRED]
By:

Its:

Printed Name:
[DELETE THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURE
LINE IF NOT REQUIRED]
By:

Its:

Printed Name:
____________________________________
Contractor’s License Number and
Classification
____________________________________
DIR Registration Number

END OF CONTRACT
263
264
Department: Utilities
Prepared By: Dennis Mejia
Staff Member Presenting: Scott Burton, Utilities
General Manager
Reviewed By: Dennice Raygoza, Courtney
Jones, Michael Sigsbee
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 11
SUBJECT: AN AMENDMENT TO THE DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ARDURRA GROUP, INC., FOR THE WESTERN TRUNK SEWER PROJECT

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
April 7, 2026
SECTION:

CONSENT CALENDAR
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 4 to the Design Services Agreement with Ardurra Group, Inc., (Ardurra) of Newport Beach, California, to provide on-call design services for the Western Trunk Sewer Project in the amount of $2,066,021 for a new total revised not-to-exceed amount of $5,112,075 and a term from June 4, 2024 to June 4, 2029.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Operate in a Businesslike Manner
Invest in the Growth and Evolution of the City's Economy Invest in the City's Infrastructure (Water, Streets, Sewers, Parks, Storm Drains and Public Facilities)
FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed Amendment No. 4 to the Design Services Agreement with Ardurra for professional engineering design services for the Western Trunk Sewer project (DIF Project No.

SW-002) increases the Agreement by $2,066,021 for a new total revised not-to-exceed amount of $5,112,075.

The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Adopted Budget includes appropriations in New Model Colony (NMC) Regional Sewer Development Impact Fee (DIF) Fund and the Sewer Capital Fund. If approved, additional appropriations will be included in future quarterly budget updates and proposed annual budgets for City Council approval. There is no impact to the General Fund.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS: The Western Trunk Sewer (WTS) is identified in the Sewer Master Plan as the primary backbone sewer main for West Ontario Ranch. This sewer will serve most of the area west of Vineyard Avenue, as well as a limited portion of the Model Colony north of Riverside Drive and west of the Whispering Lakes Golf Course. Initial segments of the WTS along Euclid Avenue and Merrill Avenue were constructed by adjacent development projects. This Project will complete the 265
remaining segment between Riverside Drive/Vineyard Avenue and Merrill Avenue.

The WTS Project will evaluate multiple potential alignment corridors primarily within existing public rights-of-way, while coordinating with public and private utility agencies and analyzing right-of-way constraints to minimize impacts to adjacent properties (see Exhibit A). The scope of work includes preparation of a Preliminary Design Report, including an Alignment Study, utility research and potholing, geotechnical investigations, preparation of plans and specifications, permitting, and bid phase support services. Environmental review will be conducted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act.

On June 4, 2024, the City Council awarded On-Call Design Services Agreements with Ardurra and four other consultants. Ardurra and the other consultants were selected using a qualificationsbased selection process. The agreements were awarded as three-year agreements with two additional one-year periods consistent with Council approved budgets. As projects arise, Staff will request proposals from the consultants and amend the original agreement with revised scopes of work and costs.

On December 4, 2025, Staff solicited proposals from these On-Call Consultants for engineering design services for the WTS Project. On January 16, 2026, the City received the following five (5) qualified proposals in response to the Request for Proposals (RFP) for UT 1096 Western Trunk Sewer:

Firm Location
Albert A Webb Associates Riverside, CA
Ardurra Group, Inc. Newport Beach, CA
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc Irvine, CA
GHD Inc. Irvine, CA
TKE Engineering, Inc. Riverside, CA
Staff has reviewed the proposals and recommends Ardurra based upon understanding of the project scope, the City’s needs, and criteria specified in the RFP, including the firms’ understanding of the project, technical approach, relevant experience, qualifications of the proposed project team, fee proposal, and references. After careful evaluation, Ardurra was determined to be the most qualified and best suited to provide the requested professional engineering services and was selected as best overall respondent.
266

EXHIBIT A
267
BB&K (2024) 1 AMENDMENT TO NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414
PAUL S. LEON
MAYOR
ALAN D. WAPNER

MAYOR PRO TEM
JIM W. BOWMAN

DEBRA PORADA

DAISY MACIAS

COUNCIL MEMBERS

SHEILA MAUTZ

CITY CLERK
JAMES R. MILHISER

CITY TREASURER

SCOTT OCHOA

CITY MANAGER
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO AND
ARDURRA GROUP, INC.

1. Parties and Date.

This Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement (as defined herein) is made and entered as of ____________, by and between the City of Ontario (“City”) and Ardurra Group, Inc., a CORPORATION, (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

2. Recitals.

2.1 Agreement. The City and Consultant have entered into an agreement entitled Amendment Authority. This Amendment No. 4 is authorized pursuant to Section 3 of “Design Services Agreement” dated June 4, 2024 (“Agreement”).

2.2 Amendment Purpose. The City and Consultant desire to amend the Agreement to revise the scope of services for the Western Trunk Sewer project, increase the compensation by Two Million, Sixty-Six Thousand, Twenty-One Dollars ($2,066,021), for a total-not-to-exceed compensation of Five Million, One Hundred and Twelve Thousand, Seventy-Five Dollars ($5,112,075) and extend the Agreement expiration date from June 4, 2027 to June 4, 2029. This increase in compensation and extension of Agreement expiration date is to accommodate the additional scope of work listed in the attached Consultants’ Proposal for UT1096 Western Trunk Sewer Project dated February 5, 2026. Parties have heretofore entered into that Amendment No. 1 dated July 16, 2024, Amendment No. 2 dated November 19, 2024, and Amendment No. 3 dated October 7, 2025.

2.3 the Agreement.

3. Terms.

3.1 Amendment.
268
BB&K (2024) 2 AGREEMENT FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
46700.00100\9423414
Section 3.1.1 Scope of Services of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

3.1.1 Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional architectural and related services necessary for the full and adequate completion of the Project consistent with the provisions of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Services”). The Services are more particularly described throughout this Agreement, including Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, any exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules, and regulations. All Services performed by Consultant shall be subject to the sole and discretionary approval of the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Additionally, Consultant shall comply with all Federal requirements applicable to the Services as set forth in Exhibit “A”.

Section 3.1.2, Term of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

The Parties may, by mutual, written consent, extend the term of this Agreement if necessary to complete the Services.

Section 3.10.1, Consultant’s Compensation for Basic Services of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

3.10.1 Consultant’s Compensation for Basic Services. City shall pay to Consultant, for the performance of all Services rendered under this Agreement, the total not to exceed amount of Five Million, One Hundred and Twelve Thousand, Seventy-Five Dollars ($5,112,075) (“Total Compensation”). This Total Compensation amount shall be based upon, and may be adjusted according to, the fee schedule and related terms and conditions attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by reference. The Total Compensation, as may be adjusted upon mutual agreement, shall constitute complete and adequate payment for Services under this Agreement.

3.2 Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 4, all other provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment No. 4. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 4, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment No. 4.

3.4 Severability. If any portion of this Amendment No. 4 is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ONTARIO
AND ARDURRA GROUP, INC.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Amendment No. 4 as of the day and year first above written.

CITY OF ONTARIO ARDURRA GROUP, INC.

By:

Its:

Printed Name:

By:

Its:

Printed Name:
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND Secretary
OR Treasurer REQUIRED]
Approved By:

Scott Ochoa
City Manager
Approved as to Form:
_____________________________________
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
Attested By:

City Clerk
271
City of Ontario
UT1096 Western Trunk Sewer Project
Scope of Work
Scope of clarifications are listed below, otherwise SOW will be executed per the RFP:

Task 1 – Preliminary Design Report (PDR)
Task 1.2 – Coordination and Alignment Study (Traffic Impacts Scope) This scope includes evaluating traffic safety and operational impacts associated with the three (3) alignment alternatives. The analysis will address the effects on vehicular traffic flow, bicycle and pedestrian movements, and driveway access for both residential and commercial properties, including access to agricultural facilities along each proposed alignment. Key considerations will include potential lane closures, detours, and construction staging impacts on roadway capacity and intersection performance. The study will also assess safety implications for all modes of travel, including minimizing conflicts between vehicles, cyclists, and pedestrians during construction. Driveway accessibility for residents and businesses will be reviewed to identify reasonable ingress and egress. Comparative evaluation of the three (3) alternatives will focus on alignments that balance operational efficiency, safety, and community access needs while supporting the overall objectives of the sewer alignment study.

Task 1.3.1 – Right-of-Way Assessment.

This scope includes evaluating the property acquisition for the three (3) selected alignments. This scope assumes that a total of 30 properties will be impacted and will be tabulated and included in the alignment study analysis. Upon completion, a report will be prepared that includes cost analysis, flow chart, and tabulated list of impacted properties. Cost analysis will be based on existing zoning, primarily including the following categories: farmland, government owned land, and vacant land. Clark Land Solutions will establish a baseline cost per square feet for the various zones along the alignments. This baseline cost will be used for comparative purposes to arrive at a preferred and recommended alignment. This scope excludes obtaining preliminary title reports and appraisal reports, that scope is deferred to Task 1.3.2.

Task 1.5 – Topographic Survey
This scope assumes that the RFP scope “ground penetrating radar services markings in the alleys within the project limits” is not required since there are no alleys within the project limits.

This scope and fee assumes the longest alignment starting at Vineyard/Riverside heading west to Grove/Riverside then heading south at Grove/Riverside to Grove/Merrill. Following the alignment study, this scope and fee and can be refined to match the selected WTS Alignment.

Task 1.6 – Potholing Services
Project scope consists of seventy-five (75) utility potholes up to 10-feet deep. This revision of scope saves the City $136,500 in fees. Refer to Task 5.6 for scope related to advancing five (5) utility potholes from 10- feet deep to 25-feet deep.

Utility Potholes: Scope will include establishing the location, alignment, depth, material, and size of clientselected utilities using air-vacuum excavation. Following excavation, the testholes will be backfilled with 1- sack cement slurry mix, compacted with a pneumatic tamper, and surface restored with a reset concrete or asphalt core or native material, depending on location. T2ue will prepare and submit Testhole Data Reports, including Photo Logs.
272
Task 1.7 – Geotechnical Investigation
Nova will perform a geotechnical investigation to evaluate the subsurface conditions along the preferred alignments with a minimum of one boring at every project street and spaced at maximum of 1,000 feet. The base scope of services will consist of the following:
• Coring the locations in existing pavements and drilling up to 19 borings along the selected alignment. The borings will be drilled at least 10 feet below the proposed pipeline invert elevations.

We assume boring depths of up to about 60 feet below the ground surface (bgs) or refusal, whichever is less, using a truck-mounted drill rig equipped with a hollow-stem auger.

Task 1.10 – Preliminary Design Report
This scope assumes that RFP scope “site considerations, flood elevations, drainage requirements, etc” are not required for linear, subsurface projects. The preliminary design report will be prepared for the selected alignment only.

Scope related to potential traffic control conflicts and solutions. This scope will evaluate potential traffic safety and mobility issues associated with the selected WTS alignment. The assessment will identify anticipated impacts on vehicular traffic operations, bicycle and pedestrian movements, and driveway access during construction and post-construction phases. Specific attention will be given to areas where lane closures, detours, or staging may create safety concerns or reduce mobility for all modes of travel. The analysis will include intersection considerations, sight distance considerations, and potential conflict points between vehicles, cyclists, and pedestrians. Based on the evaluation, practical measures, and design solutions will be identified such as crash cushions for barriers. These solutions will be incorporated into the project’s special provisions for safe and efficient traffic operations during the construction period and maintain accessibility for residents and businesses in accordance with the City’s standard requirements.

Task 2 – CEQA Compliance
Ardurra will prepare a Notice of Exemption (NOE) Form, per CEQA Guidelines Appendix E, for review and approval by the City. However, as over a decade has passed since preparation of the 2012 Plans and associated CEQA IS/MND, our effort will include an evaluation of the project against the list of exceptions outlined in Section 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines, along with supporting technical memoranda for biological resources and cultural resources, and a hazards database search. We will draft a CEQA-compliant project description that identifies the project’s physical components, summarizes existing and surrounding land uses, and describes the construction and operational characteristics of the project. Construction details will include equipment, duration of various activities, and any related demolition, grading, and construction phases. A regional location and local vicinity map will be prepared. We understand that construction will principally occur within established right-of-way (previously disturbed areas) and expect that preconstruction bird nesting surveys, if needed, can be performed to avoid potentially significant impacts.

Technical information from online research and field surveys, along with Best Management Practices (BMPs) incorporated into the project description, will be the basis for the CEQA NOE finding. The Draft NOE will be submitted to the City for one round of review and comment. Revisions will be incorporated into the Final NOE. As per the RFP, we understand that the City will file the NOE form and pay the $50 NOE filing fee with the San Bernardino County Clerk.

Task 3 – Engineering Design Services and Project Management The scope of the project can range from the longest alignment approximately 18,500 linear feet to approximately 11,900 linear feet. This variation can change the scope from 24 plan and profile sheets to 15 273
plan and profile sheets. Therefore, we based our scope and fee on the longest possible alignment. If the City prefers to adjust the scope and fee after the selected alignment is established, that will be accommodated.

Task 5 – Additional Services
Task 5.1 – Additional Services
This scope is reserved for additional services requested by the City and authorized in advance. The fee reflects 10% of the baseline fee.

Task 5.2 – Design of Tunneling Methods for 3 Trenchless Crossings This scope includes design of the trenchless crossings of an assumed three (3) major utility corridors.

Depending on the length, depth, and complexities of the three assumed utility corridor crossings, this scope may be required to design the trenchless sections. If additional trenchless sections are required, this scope and fee will need to be adjusted.

Task 5.3 – Bid Phase of Tunneling Methods for 3 Trenchless Crossings Aldea will support the team during bid phase for trenchless construction.

Task 5.4 – Plat and Legal Descriptions (10 properties) (See Task 1.3.2) This scope includes preparing plat and legal descriptions for the properties identified during the alignment study. This scope and fee assumes a total of 10 properties. This scope can be permanent right-of-way or temporary construction easements. If the impacts are minor, similar to UT1050, this scope can be converted to Permit to Enter and Construct form letters and obtaining signatures. This scope will be further refined following the selection of the preferred alignment.

Task 5.5 – Survey Point of Pothole PK nail (75 pothole locations) This scope includes obtaining field survey points of the 75 pothole PK nail markers placed directly above the utility pothole location. This scope adds the vertical elevation of the existing ground surface over the utility potholed. This scope is optional since Task 1.6 will provide the horizontal location, which in many cases is sufficiently accurate.

Task 5.6 – Advance 5 Utility Potholes from 10-feet deep to 25-ft deep This scope advances a total of five (5) utility potholes from 10-feet deep to 25-feet deep. Our estimated five (5) utility potholes at 25-feet deep is based on our knowledge of the existing alignments and utilities in this area.

Task 5.7 – Utility Locating Services
The RFP requested the use of GPR for locating utilities within alleys. Since none of the alignments shown in the RFP contain alleys, this scope may not apply. This scope includes the use of GPR and other utility locating services to a limit of $9,000 along the final selected alignment. The scope includes: (1) Designate conductive utilities with direct connection or passive induction locating equipment, (2) Designate sewer and storm drain pipes with sondes and rodding, if possible, and (3) Sweep the area for unknown utilities using tandem passive induction, radio and power signature scanning, ground Penetrating Radar (GPR). T2ue will prepare a Field Sketch of the designating results, including comments and notes. The field sketch will be used to support the survey of utility alignments and deliverable production. Field sketches will be provided in ACAD as a *.dwg and *.dxf.
274
Task 5.8 – Environmental Sampling and Testing (Industrial Zones) If the selected alignment traverses a site of concern, this scope includes performing environmental laboratory analysis on selected soil samples to evaluate the presence of chemicals of concern at tested locations within the project alignment. For preliminary screening purposes, we will analyze selected soil samples for the following if PID readings are greater than 45 parts per million and include the minimum detectable limit with the results:
• Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) (C8-C40) by EPA Method 8015B • CAM 17 Total Metals by EPA Methods 6010B and 7471A (Mercury) • Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260B/5035 • Semivolatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270D Schedule
Activity Description Start End
Project Kick Off 03/01/26 03/02/26
Pre-Alignment Study 03/02/26 04/01/26
Alignment Study 04/01/26 05/01/26
Pre-PDR 05/01/26 06/30/26
PDR/30% Plans 06/30/26 09/03/26
Post-PDR 09/03/26 09/18/26
60% PS&E 09/18/26 11/17/26
90% PS&E 11/17/26 01/16/27
100% PS&E 01/16/27 03/17/27
Bid Documents 03/17/27 04/16/27
Bid Phase 04/16/27 06/15/27
Project Complete 06/15/27 06/16/27
Schedule Assumptions:

1. PS&E submittals require Citywide Plan Check

2. Citywide Plan Reviews are 4-weeks

3. ROW Acquisition is not included
275
City of Ontario
UT1096 Western Trunk Sewer Project
Fee Proposal
Labor Hours
Project
Director
Design
Manager
Sewer
Modeling Structural Env Planner
Title Project Manager V Project Manager III Project Engineer IV Project Engineer II Project Engineer I CAD Designer V Project Manager IV Project Manager II Project Manager IV Senior Traffic Engineer Traffic Engineering Technician III* QA/QC Manager Administrative Assistant III* Tunneling Geotechnical Potholing Right-of- Way Cultural Biologist Surveyor Sub Markup Expenses Total 2024 Billing Rates, $/Hr (escalated 3% annually) $350 $265 $297 $180 $175 $190 $297 $233 $297 $276 $159 $308 $120 Total Hours Labor LJB (Aldea) Nova T2ue Clark Land Solutions O'Day 10% Task 1 Preliminary Design Report (PDR)
Project Management and Administration 24 40 24 12 100 $24,760 $0 $500 $25,260

1.1 Project Kickoff Meeting 1 2 1 4 8 $1,897 $0 $1,897

1.2 Coordination and Alignment Study
Pre-Alignment Study 4 4 4 8 12 12 8 52 $11,844 $0 $11,844 Alignment Study 8 24 4 8 40 40 8 20 6 8 166 $37,702 $0 $500 $38,202Post-Alignment Study 2 4 6 $1,760 $0 $1,760 Workshop 1 - Alignment Study 1 4 1 8 14 $3,147 $0 $3,147

1.3 Right-of-Way Assessment1.3.1 Right-of-Way Assessment (30 properties) 8 8 $2,120 $56,880 $5,688 $64,688

1.3.2 Optional - Appraisal and Acquisition (Assume 10 properties) 8 8 $2,120 $157,280 $15,728 $175,128

1.4 Data Collection, Utility Research and Notifications 8 80 88 $16,520 $0 $500 $17,0201.5A Right-of-Way Mapping (Ex and Future ROW) (For Alignment Study, all 30 segments) 4 4 $1,060 $55,020 $5,502 $61,582

1.5B Topographic Survey (For Selected Alignment) 4 4 $1,060 $156,240 $15,624 $172,924

1.6 Utility Potholing Services (75 total PH @ 10-ft deep) (see Task 5.6 for add'l cost to advance 5 PHs to 25-ft deep) 4 24 28 $5,260 $166,905 $16,691 $500 $189,356

1.7 Geotechnical Investigation (Assume 19 spaced at 1,000 ft) 4 4 $1,060 $209,828 $20,983 $231,871

1.8 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (30%) 12 12 24 $5,340 $0 $5,340

1.9 Project Schedule updated (updated monthly) 24 24 $6,360 $0 $6,360

1.10 Preliminary Design Report (PDR)
Preliminary Plans (30%) (Assumed 30 sheets) 2 24 4 8 80 120 4 242 $47,720 $0 $500 $48,220 Evaluate Traffic Impacts 4 4 $1,060 $0 $1,060
CEQA Requirements 4 4 $1,060 $0 $1,060
Draft PDR 8 24 16 80 80 16 8 8 10 6 6 262 $56,866 $0 $300 $57,166 Final PDR 8 24 16 80 80 16 8 8 6 246 $53,152 $0 $300 $53,452

1.11 Preliminary Design Workshops
Workshop 2 - Draft PDR 1 4 2 4 11 $2,724 $0 $2,724Workshop 3 - Final PDR 1 4 2 4 11 $2,724 $0 $2,724

1.12 Public and Private Agency Utility Coordination 2 16 16 34 $7,740 $0 $7,740 Preliminary Design Report (PDR) $21,700 $66,250 $14,850 $57,600 $58,100 $32,680 $14,256 $3,728 $4,752 $8,280 $1,908 $7,392 $1,440 1344 $292,936 $0 $209,828 $166,905 $56,880 $0 $0 $211,260 $64,487 $3,100 $1,005,396 Task 2 CEQA Compliance
Coordination with City Planning Department 2 4 4 10 $2,418 $0 $2,418Provide Technical Input (Exhibits, Project Description) 2 4 20 4 30 $7,650 $7,700 $5,000 $1,270 $21,620 CEQA Compliance $0 $1,060 $0 $0 $1,400 $0 $0 $0 $7,128 $0 $0 $0 $480 40 $10,068 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,700 $5,000 $0 $1,270 $0 $24,038 Task 3 Engineering Design Services and Project Management Project Management and Administration 12 80 8 12 112 $29,216 $0 $500 $29,716

3.1 Preliminary Design (60% PS&E) 2 24 4 40 120 120 24 40 374 $77,160 $0 $77,160

3.2 Detailed Design (90%) Submittal 2 24 4 40 120 120 16 40 366 $75,296 $0 $75,296

3.3 Final Design Revisions 2 24 4 40 80 120 16 286 $57,176 $0 $57,1763.4 Final Working Drawings and Specifications (100%) Submittal 2 24 4 40 80 120 16 16 302 $60,904 $0 $60,904

3.5 Permits
DDW Waivers (if required) 1 12 24 37 $7,730 $0 $7,730
IEUA Crossings 1 12 24 37 $7,730 $0 $7,730
SBCFCD Crossings 1 12 24 37 $7,730 $0 $7,730

3.6 Opinion of Construction Cost (60%, 90%, 100%) 2 12 24 8 46 $10,544 $0 $10,544 Engineering Design Services and Project Management $8,750 $59,360 $7,128 $28,800 $86,800 $91,200 $0 $13,048 $0 $0 $0 $36,960 $1,440 1597 $333,486 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $333,986 Task 4 Bid Phase Support Services

4.1 Pre-Bid Conference 1 1 2 $445 $0 $445

4.2 Miscellaneous Bid Phase Services 24 24 48 $10,680 $0 $10,6804.3 Conformed Documents 4 32 36 $6,660 $0 $6,660 Bid Phase Support Services $0 $7,685 $0 $4,500 $5,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 86 $17,785 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,785 Task 5 Additional and Optional Services

5.1 Additional Services (10% of Tasks 1 thru 4) $138,1205.2 Design of Tunneling Methods for 3 Trenchless Crossings 2 16 16 24 58 $17,084 $192,960 $19,296 $229,3405.3 Bid Phase of Tunneling Methods for 3 Trenchless Crossings 2 2 $530 $8,000 $800 $9,3305.4 Plat and Legal Descriptions (10 properties) (See Task 1.3.2) 1 4 8 13 $2,810 $69,200 $6,920 $78,9305.5 Survey Point of Pothole PK nail (75 pothole locations) 2 2 4 $880 $21,440 $2,144 $24,4645.6 Advance 5 PHs from 10-ft deep to 25-ft deep 2 2 $530 $9,750 $975 $11,255

5.7 Utility Locating Services (including GPR) 4 4 8 $1,760 $0 $1,760

5.8 Environmental Sampling and Testing (Industrial Zones) 2 2 $530 $14,508 $1,451 $16,489 Additional and Optional Services $1,050 $8,480 $4,752 $0 $2,450 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,392 $0 89 $24,124 $200,960 $14,508 $9,750 $0 $0 $0 $90,640 $31,586 $0 $371,568 Total Hours 90 547 90 505 882 652 48 72 40 30 12 168 28 3164 Base Fee $30,450 $134,355 $21,978 $90,900 $151,900 $123,880 $14,256 $16,776 $11,880 $8,280 $1,908 $44,352 $3,360 $654,275 $0 $209,828 $166,905 $56,880 $7,700 $5,000 $211,260 $65,757 $3,600 $1,381,205 TOTAL T&M NTE TASKS 1 THRU 4, EXCLUDES TASK 1.3.2 AND TASK 5 $1,381,205 OPTIONAL TASK 1.3.2 $175,128
TASK 5.1 (10% Add'l) $138,120
TASK 5 $371,568
TOTAL T&M NTE, INCLUDES TASK 1.3.2 AND TASK 5 $2,066,021 Subconsultants
Fee Budget
1 of 1 2/5/2026
276
Department: Housing
Prepared By: Albert Ramirez
Department:

Prepared By: Albert Ramirez
Staff Member Presenting: Helen McAlary,
Executive Director Community Life and Culture
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 12
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MEMBERSHIP IN THE SAN BERNARDINO

REGIONAL HOUSING TRUST

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
April 7, 2026
SECTION:

CONSENT CALENDAR
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council take the following actions:

A. Approve the admission of the City of Ontario to the San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust; and
B. Adopt a Resolution to join the Joint Powers Authority Agreement.

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Pursue City's Goals and Objectives by Working with Other Governmental Agencies Invest in the Growth and Evolution of the City's Economy Operate in a Businesslike Manner
FISCAL IMPACT: The fully operational annual cost for the San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust is estimated at $475,000. Annual membership fees will be assessed on a pro rata basis based on the number of participating jurisdictions and their populations.

Currently, nine cities and the County have opted to participate, and the projected annual membership fee is $55,000 per jurisdiction at this level of participation. However, 18 cities and the County have signed letters of intent indicating their interest in joining the Trust. It is anticipated that most, if not all, of these jurisdictions will ultimately participate. If additional jurisdictions join, the annual membership fee is expected to decrease as operational costs are shared among more members. With broader participation, the estimated annual membership fee could decrease to $15,000-$35,000 per jurisdiction. The membership term will commence in May 2026 and will continue until terminated or the Trust is dissolved.

If approved, additional appropriations will be included at a future quarterly update to City Council for approval as needed.
277
BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS: California is experiencing a significant housing supply and affordability crisis driven by high land costs, rising construction costs, and limited financing options.

These challenges have localized impacts that affect housing availability, homelessness, and economic conditions across communities. Addressing these issues requires coordinated actions at the local, regional, and state levels.

One regional strategy is the establishment of the San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust, which would raise and leverage funds to support affordable housing production, preservation, rehabilitation, and related housing activities.

In response to growing housing challenges, the City and County Managers Technical Advisory Committee of the San Bernardino Council of Governments (SBCOG) formed an Ad Hoc Subcommittee in 2021 to explore the feasibility of creating a regional housing trust fund.

At the Subcommittee's direction, SBCOG released the San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust White Paper in January 2022, outlining the potential benefits, governance structures, and case studies related to establishing a regional housing trust.

Following the release of the White Paper, SBCOG released the San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust Strategic Plan, which assessed the housing needs in the San Bernardino County, identified potential funding sources, evaluated financing strategies, and outlined activities that the San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust could support.

Throughout 2022 and 2023, SBCOG conducted outreach across the region, engaging local decisionmaking bodies, city and county managers, planning staff, elected officials, developers, and housing administrators regarding the San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust. Based on research and stakeholder engagement conducted, it is recommended that the housing trust serving the San Bernardino County be structured as a Joint Powers Authority consisting of local jurisdictions within the region.

On April 5, 2023, the SBCOG Board of Directors authorized staff to begin the process of establishing the San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust, including the formation of a new Joint Powers Authority.

Benefits
The San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust is intended to provide a coordinated regional and programmatic approach to addressing housing needs throughout the San Bernardino region. The San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust will raise and leverage funds to support the production of affordable housing and related activities.

Participating in the Joint Powers Authority would provide several benefits to participating jurisdictions, including:

Expand funding opportunities by leveraging state, federal, and private resources; Support affordable housing projects within individual jurisdictions and across the region; 278
Provide regional coordination and administrative capacity to address housing needs comprehensively;
Attract development interest to the region; and
Ensure local representation in decision-making through the Joint Powers Authority governance structure.

Overall, participation in the Joint Powers Authority would strengthen the region's ability to secure funding, coordinate resources, and advance affordable housing development.

Structure of the Joint Powers Authority
The San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement has been drafted to incorporate the provisions of Senate Bill 20 (2023) and the California Joint Exercise of Powers Act.

Utilizing the provisions of Senate Bill 20 allows the San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust to be an early adopter of this legislation, drawing attention from the State Legislature and improve the San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust's ability to secure State funding. Additionally, utilizing the broader powers under the California Joint Exercise of Powers Act allows the San Bernardino Regional Trust to exercise powers common to its member agencies with greater flexibility.

The governing structure of the San Bernardino Regional Trust will consist of a Board of Directors that exercises all powers and authority on behalf of the organization. The Board of Directors will include a locally elected representative from each agency participating in the San Bernardino Regional Trust, as well as at least two housing policy experts.

Directors who serve as housing policy experts are to be selected by a vote of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors will also elect officers such as the Chairperson and Vice Chairperson, and may establish advisory committees to support its work.

The San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust may also contract for administrative staff or services as necessary. The Board of Directors is responsible for adopting bylaws, overseeing budgets, and ensuring compliance with California's Joint Exercise of Powers Act and related statutes. Board meetings will be subject to the Brown Act, ensuring transparency and public accountability.

Overall, the governance model balances representation from local governments with subjectmatter expertise, while maintaining independence from the member agencies.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve participation in the San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust and authorize execution of the Resolution. 279

Page 1 of 12 ends

Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement

SAN BERNARDINO REGIONAL HOUSING TRUST
THIS JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made this [NUMBER] day of [MONTH], 2026 (“Effective Date”) pursuant to Government Code Section 6500 et seq., including but not limited to Government Code 6539.1, and other pertinent provisions of law, by and between San Bernardino County (the “County”) and those cities within San Bernardino County who become signatories to this Agreement (“Cities”), and relates to the joint exercise of powers among the signatories hereto, each of which is hereafter referred to as “Member Agency” and collectively referred to as “Member Agencies” or “Members.”

RECITALS
A. The Member Agencies have determined that a shortage of affordable housing exists as a result of various causes and wish to provide additional housing opportunities in a coordinated and comprehensive manner. The Member Agencies acknowledge that an adequate supply of housing will provide social and economic benefits to residents and taxpayers of each Member Agency.

B. Each Member Agency has the individual power to plan, acquire, manage, regulate, operate, finance and control the development, construction, and operations of affordable housing programs, including housing serving the workforce, moderate- and lower-income households, and those experiencing homelessness, generated within its jurisdictional boundaries, as well as to create and issue development agreements for such activities. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall preclude any Member Agency from establishing, maintaining or providing programs or services to its respective residents as it deems proper or necessary.

C. The Member Agencies find it in their mutual economic interest to address housing needs of their residents on a regional level within the boundaries of San Bernardino County.

D. The Member Agencies desire to act in the public interest to lessen the burden on government by reducing the need for each Member Agency to act individually, and to provide charitable support for housing within their geographic boundaries.

E. California Government Code Section 6500 et seq. (“Joint Exercise of Powers Act” or “Act”) permits two or more public agencies to create joint powers authorities for the purposes set forth herein, permits the agencies to exercise jointly any power that the public agencies could exercise separately, and further grants certain additional powers to such joint powers authorities.

F. California Government Code Section 6539.1 authorizes the creation of a regional housing trust pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, subject to certain requirements regarding governing composition and annual financial and auditing requirements.

G. Local land-use decisions remain solely with each Member Agency. Nothing in this Agreement deprives any party of its sovereign powers with respect to land use nor transfers such powers to this joint powers authority.
280

Page 2 of 12 ends

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Member Agencies do hereby establish the entity to be known as the San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust, or SBRHT, to generate and/or maintain housing, disburse funding, and take other actions that will result in permanent additions to the housing stock within SBRHT’s jurisdictional boundaries, and do hereby agree as follows:

1. Purpose.

1.1 The purpose of this Agreement is to establish a legal public entity separate from the Member Agencies that shall be responsible for the joint acquisition, management, operation, fundraising, planning, adoption, financing, administration, review, monitoring, and reporting of certain housing activities in the region for the benefit of those experiencing homelessness and extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate-income households, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code. By entering this joint powers authority Agreement, the Member Agencies seek to gain economic benefits not realized when operating individually. Further, the establishment of this joint powers authority provides for the economic viability and coordination of housing program financing and facilities throughout SBRHT’s jurisdictional boundaries.

1.2 SBRHT shall be an entity which is legally independent from the parties to this Agreement and shall be responsible for the administration of this Agreement.

1.3 The assets, rights, debts, liabilities, and obligations of SBRHT shall not constitute assets, rights, debts, liabilities, and obligations of any of the Member Agencies. However, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent any of the Member Agencies from separately contracting for, or assuming responsibility for, specific debts, liabilities, or obligations of SBRHT, provided that the SBRHT Board of Directors (“Board”) and the Member Agency approve, in writing signed by each party, such contract or assumption.

2. Powers.

2.1 General Powers. SBRHT shall have all the powers common to the Member Agencies of this agreement necessary or convenient, specified or implied, to accomplish the purpose of this Agreement as set forth in Section 1 above, subject to the restrictions set forth in Section 2.7. Said powers shall be exercised in the manner provided in the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, including without limitation all powers set forth in Government Code Section 6539.1.

2.2 Specific Powers. Without limiting the generality of the powers conferred in subdivision 2.1 of Section 2, SBRHT is authorized to act on any or all of the following matters, as each Member Agency could act separately, and as it deems in the best interest of its Members, to the extent permitted by any and all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, resolutions, and regulations:
a. Facilitate and assist the Member Agencies and others in the housing sector to acquire, construct, rehabilitate, finance, refinance, operate, regulate, and maintain affordable housing programs, projects, and facilities, as determined by the Board. 281

Page 3 of 12 ends

b. Coordinate and collaborate with Member Agencies on funding solicitations and other opportunities for the purposes set forth in this Agreement to minimize and avoid, where possible, competition and redundancy in the pursuit of funding. c. Facilitate the planning, study, and recommendation of proper and appropriate SBRHT programs, activities, and management practices; including the research and study of issues related to housing.
d. Educate the public, Member Agencies, and other agencies and entities on SBRHT programs. e. Provide for or enter into agreements to provide for administrative, financial, construction, engineering, legal, audit, and any other professional services supporting any of the SBRHT programs or activities.
f. Solicit, apply for, accept, and receive grants, donations, advances, and contributions. g. Sue and be sued in its own name.
h. Incur and discharge debts, liabilities, and obligations which may include but shall not be limited to being in the form of secured bonds, revenue bonds, or other forms of secured or unsecured debt.
i. Issue bonds or notes and associated covenants, for designated purposes. j. Acquire or protect any necessary security or leasehold interests involved in loans, bonds, notes, or other financing methods implemented to carry out the purpose of this Agreement. k. Acquire, hold, lease, improve, construct, rehabilitate, maintain, pledge, assign, mortgage, operate, and dispose of real and personal property as may be necessary and appropriate in connection with the creation, construction, financing, development, and maintenance of certain workforce and affordable housing and the programmatic needs of SBRHT. l. Issue and receive loans.
m. Acquire such insurance protection as it deems necessary. n. Adopt resolutions and ordinances necessary to carry out the purpose of this Agreement. o. Establish advisory committees or subcommittees as necessary. p. Form wholly-owned and controlled affiliate entities to accomplish any of its purposes. q. Adopt bylaws and such other rules and procedures as may be deemed necessary. r. Convey real and/or personal property interests and/or funds. s. Any other acts necessary to carry out the above identified actions that each Member Agency is empowered to take individually.

2.3 SBRHT shall undertake, facilitate, and encourage the acquisition, creation, construction, development, and maintenance of affordable housing programs, projects, and facilities, as determined by the Board.
282

Page 4 of 12 ends

2.4 SBRHT shall implement programs, financing mechanisms, and funding criteria to support and advance affordable housing opportunities within the jurisdictional boundaries of the Member Agencies. These programs may include, but are not limited to, loan and grant programs, land acquisition and disposition programs, and other initiatives designed to increase the supply, preservation, and quality of affordable housing.

2.5 SBRHT may establish criteria, policies, and guidelines governing eligibility, funding priorities, and program administration, provided such criteria are consistent with the purposes of this Agreement and applicable state and federal laws.

2.6 Equitable Member Agency Investment. The SBRHT Board shall establish criteria to allow for the equitable distribution of funds, and shall not exclude any Member Agency based on its rural, suburban, or urban character, as defined by the Board. Funding programs will not be set up as a means to impose zoning or land use changes within the boundaries of the Member Agencies.

2.7 Limitation on Powers. This Agreement does not authorize, and expressly prohibits, SBRHT to do any of the following:
a. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as transferring or delegating to SBRHT any land use, zoning, or development permitting power of the Member Agencies. Each member agency shall retain full and independent authority over land use decisions within its jurisdiction, including but not limited to general plan amendments, zoning classifications, entitlements, and project approvals. Any project or program funded or supported by SBRHT shall comply with the applicable general plans, zoning ordinances, and other land use regulations of the member agency within which the project is located, unless otherwise approved by the Member Agency. b. Regulate land use within the jurisdiction of any of the Member Agencies; c. Levy, or advocate or incentivize the levying of, any land use exaction, such as an impact fee, charge, dedication, reservation, or tax assessment, as a condition of approving the funding for or approval of, a development project;
d. Require inclusionary zoning requirements;
e. Fund or otherwise approve an agreement for a housing project that is not permitted by the Member Agency within whose jurisdiction the project is proposed to be located; or f. Require any Member Agency to accept or provide any specific number of housing units as a prerequisite to joining or remaining a party to this Agreement. g. Impose additional development standards for grant funding beyond what is already conditioned by another entity.
h. In the event that the SBRHT has employees, the creation of any employee pension plan or any other retirement plan other than a plan created under the federal Internal Revenue Code Sections 401(k), 403(b), 457(b), or Roth account plan.
283

Page 5 of 12 ends

3. Term and Termination

3.1 This Agreement shall be effective, and SBRHT shall come into existence, on the Effective Date, which shall be the date upon which this Agreement has been approved by three eligible Member Agencies.

3.2 This Agreement shall continue until terminated or dissolved pursuant to Section 3.3 of this Agreement. However, in no event shall the Member Agencies terminate or dissolve SBRHT if its termination or dissolution would conflict with or violate the terms or conditions of any bonds, financial instruments, or related documentation by or on behalf of SBRHT, including, without limitation, indentures, resolutions, and letter of credit agreements.

3.3 This Agreement may be terminated by consent of a majority of the Member Agencies, and upon full and complete liquidation of all liabilities, including, but not limited to, any bonds, consistent with Section 3.2. Upon termination of this Agreement, any surplus money or assets in possession of SBRHT, after payment of all liabilities, shall be distributed to the then-existing Member Agencies in proportion to the contributions made by each.

4. Governance

4.1 Members. The Member Agencies of SBRHT shall be the parties to this agreement who have not withdrawn from SBRHT, and such other entities that may join SBRHT after execution of this Agreement. New Members may join based on the terms and conditions set forth in Section 11.

4.2 Affiliates. Entities that are eligible to be a party to this Agreement may join the SBRHT as an affiliate.

Entities that join as an affiliate are not eligible to have a member of their governing board serve on the Board of Directors, as described in Section 4.3, or receive funding for a project within their jurisdiction until such time, if ever, they become a Member of the SBRHT. An eligible entity may become an affiliate through written notice from the executive officer of the entity, but shall not be a party to this Agreement.

4.3 Board of Directors; Composition. SBRHT is governed and administered by a Board of Directors (“Board”) that shall exercise all powers and authority on behalf of SBRHT. The membership of the Board of SBRHT shall be in accordance with Government Code Section 6539.1, and as it may be amended. As currently required at execution of this Agreement, the SBRHT Board shall consist of at least five (5) Directors, as follows:
a. At least three (3) Directors shall be locally elected officials from their respective Member Agency jurisdictions, and appointed by their respective Member, and b. Each Member Agency may appoint up to one (1) Director, and c. At least two (2) Directors shall be experts in homeless or housing policy that are not elected officials of any local agency. These Director positions shall be selected by a majority vote of the elected membership of the Board prescribed in Section 4.3(a) of this Agreement, and d. A majority of Directors must be locally elected officials from their respective Member Agency jurisdiction, and
284

Page 6 of 12 ends

e. Alternates for each Director position may be established by the Board of Directors, provided that such alternates meet the requirements established in this Agreement and under the bylaws adopted by the Board of Directors.

4.4 Advisory Committees. The Board may establish one or more advisory committees to advise the Board, pursuant to the bylaws.

4.5 Director Terms. The Member Agencies shall select their respective Directors for the Board no later than the Effective Date, or the effective date of the respective Member Agency entering into this Agreement, as may be applicable. Each Director shall serve a term of two years, but may be reappointed for successive two-year terms in accordance with this Agreement. At least 15 days prior to the end of a Director’s term, the respective Member Agency must select a new Director or reselect the current Director for the new term of office. There is no limit on the number of terms a Director may serve. In the event of a vacancy on the Board in a Director position originally appointed by a Member Agency pursuant to this Agreement in Section 4.3(b), that Member Agency shall appoint a replacement in accordance with the criteria of Section 4.3(a) within 60 days of such vacancy who shall serve out the remainder of the term of the Director that has been replaced. In the event of a vacancy on the Board in a Director position appointed pursuant to this Agreement in Section 4.3(c), the SBRHT Board shall appoint a replacement in accordance with the criteria of Section 4.3(c) within 60 days of such vacancy who shall serve out the remainder of the term of the Director that has been replaced.

4.6 Officers. The Board of Directors shall elect a chairperson and a vice chairperson from among its Directors consistent with Section 8.6.

4.7 Compensation. Directors shall serve on the Board without compensation. Directors may be reimbursed for actual expenses that are approved in accordance with applicable provisions of this Agreement and SBRHT bylaws before the expenses are incurred.

5. Budgets and Financing.

5.1 The Fiscal Year of SBRHT shall, unless and until changed by the Board of Directors, commence on the 1st day of July of each year and shall end on the 30th day of June of the next succeeding year except that the initial Fiscal Year of SBRHT shall commence on the Effective Date of this Agreement and conclude on the next June 30th.

5.2 The Board shall annually adopt an operating budget for SBRHT setting forth anticipated expenses, financing sources and proposed service levels necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. The payment of all SBRHT obligations is limited to the amount of appropriations allowed in SBRHT’s approved budget, except as it may be revised with the approval of a majority of the Board of Directors. The budget for SBRHT shall distinguish between administrative costs (i.e., the cost of operating SBRHT) and program costs (i.e., the financing of the programs funded or sponsored by SBRHT).

5.3 The particular Program and Program budget funded, sponsored, or operated by SBRHT, as well as the level of, and mechanisms for, the involvement of SBRHT and each Member Agency, in such 285

Page 7 of 12 ends

Program and Program budget, shall be determined and approved by the Board. A Member Agency’s individual contribution, involvement, and role in any particular Program or the Program budget shall be mutually agreed between the Member Agency and SBRHT. By way of example only, said contributions, involvement, or role may include cash contributions, provision of services or staffing, use or transfer of title to real or personal property, pledges, guarantees, or whatever other instruments or involvement the Member Agency and SBRHT may agree to. Contributions of all kinds to the Program budget from private persons or entities and not-for-profit entities, whether their interests are represented by any Directors, are encouraged, so long as they do not cause a violation of any applicable conflicts of interest statutes, rules, or regulations.

6. Financial Management.

6.1 Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6505.5 and 6505.6, the Board shall appoint an officer of SBRHT to hold the offices of treasurer and auditor of SBRHT. This officer can be either the treasurer of a Member Agency to this Agreement or a certified public accountant. Such person or persons shall possess the powers of and shall perform the treasurer and auditor functions for SBRHT required by Sections 6505, 6505.5, and 6505.6 of the Government Code, including any amendments thereto. Pursuant to Government Code Section 6505.1, the auditor and treasurer shall have charge of certain property of SBRHT. The treasurer and auditor shall ensure that there shall be strict accountability of all funds and reporting of all receipts and disbursements of SBRHT. The treasurer and auditor of SBRHT shall be required to file an official bond as required by Government Code Section 6505.1 with the Board of Directors in an amount which shall be established by the Board.

Should the existing bond or bonds of any such officer be extended to cover the obligations provided herein, said bond shall be the official bond required herein. The premiums on any such bonds attributable to the coverage required herein shall be an appropriate expense of SBRHT.

6.2 SBRHT shall publish an Annual Financial Report that shall describe the funds received by SBRHT and the use of such funds by SBRHT. The Annual Financial Report shall describe how the funds received by SBRHT have furthered the purpose of SBRHT.

7. Additional Officers and Staffing.

7.1 It is understood that SBRHT will require the support of administrative staff. When deemed necessary, the Board may contract for officers and staff with a Member Agency, the San Bernardino Council of Governments, or other independent contractors, agents, or volunteers as the Board may deem necessary to carry out any of SBRHT’s powers, upon such terms and conditions as the Board may require, including the retaining of professional and technical assistance, provided that adequate funds are available in SBRHT’s budget and are appropriated by SBRHT therefore.

7.2 None of the officers, agents, or staff, if any, directly contracted by SBRHT shall be deemed, by reason of their roles or duties or contracted status, to be employed by any Member Agency.

7.3 The officer or staff may be delegated authority as deemed necessary or appropriate by the Board.

7.4 If SBRHT contracts with a Member Agency to provide SBRHT with administrative services through persons who are employees and/or officers of the Member Agency, then any retirement liabilities 286

Page 8 of 12 ends

associated with that Member Agency’s employees and/or officers shall not constitute a liability of SBRHT or any other Member Agency. This shall not preclude a Member Agency providing administrative services to SBRHT pursuant to a contract with SBRHT from accounting for such salary and benefit costs when negotiating the rates that the Member will charge SBRHT for providing such services.

7.5 All privileges and immunities from liability, exemptions from laws, ordinances and rules, and benefits that apply to officers, agents, or employees of a Member Agency shall apply to the same extent when performing duties for SBRHT.

8. Meetings.

8.1 The Board shall schedule at least two (2) regular meetings each Fiscal Year.

8.2 Special meetings of the Board may be called by the Chairperson of the Board and otherwise in accordance with provisions of California Government Code Section 54956 and any applicable SBRHT bylaws.

8.3 All meetings of the Board shall be held subject to the provisions of California Government Code Section 54950 et seq. (the “Brown Act”) and other applicable laws of the State of California.

8.4 A quorum is established if at least a majority of Directors are present at a meeting, except that less than a quorum may adjourn a meeting to another time and place. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement or otherwise defined in the Bylaws, actions and decisions of the Board of Directors may be taken by a majority of the quorum present at any meeting. Each Director of a Member Agency shall have one vote and no weighted or proxy votes shall be permitted.

8.5 The Board of Directors shall cause minutes of all regular, adjourned regular, and special meetings to be kept as record of all meetings.

8.6 The Board of Directors shall elect a chairperson and a vice chairperson from among its Directors at the first meeting held in each calendar year. In the event that the chairperson or vice chairperson so elected ceases to be a Director, the resulting vacancy shall be filled at the next regular meeting of the Board of Directors held after such vacancy occurs or at a special meeting called for that purpose.

In the absence or inability of the chairperson to act, the vice chairperson shall act as chairperson.

The chairperson, or in the chairperson's absence, the vice chairperson, shall preside at and conduct all Board of Director meetings.

8.7 The Board of Directors may adopt, from time to time, by resolution, such rules, regulations and bylaws for the conduct of its meetings and affairs as the Board determines is necessary or convenient.

9. Bylaws.

9.1 The Board shall adopt bylaws for the conduct of its affairs, provided that they are consistent with this Agreement and are appropriate in order to carry out SBRHT’s purpose. 287

Page 9 of 12 ends

9.2 The Board may, from time to time, amend its bylaws.

10. Fees.

10.1 Member Agencies shall make annual contributions (“Administrative Fee”) towards the budgeted administrative costs of SBRHT in accordance with a cost allocation as determined and approved annually by the Board of Directors. Payment shall be due within 30 days of receipt of an invoice from SBRHT.

11. New Members.

11.1 New Member Agencies may be added to SBRHT by a majority vote of the Directors present at the meeting. Membership is effective immediately upon execution of this Agreement by the new Member Agency.

12. Withdrawal.

12.1 It is fully anticipated that each Member Agency shall participate in SBRHT until the purposes set forth in this Agreement are accomplished. A Member Agency may withdraw from SBRHT upon its governing board’s adoption of a resolution stating its intent to withdraw from SBRHT. The withdrawal of any Member Agency shall be conditioned as follows:
a. The withdrawal shall be effective at the end of the SBRHT Fiscal Year which is at least 180 days after the receipt by SBRHT of a written notice of the Member Agency’s intent to withdraw, accompanied by a copy of the governing board resolution stating the intent to withdraw; and b. Unless otherwise provided by a unanimous vote of the SBRHT Board, withdrawal shall result in the forfeiture of that Member Agency’s rights and claims relating to distribution of property and funds upon termination of SBRHT. Withdrawn Members shall not be entitled to any reimbursement of Administrative Fees.

13. Amendments.

13.1 Except as provided in Sections 11 and 12, subject to all legal obligations of SBRHT, this Agreement may be amended by a writing executed by all of the Member Agencies of SBRHT.

14. Notices.

14.1 All notices to the Member Agencies shall be deemed to have been given to the Member Agencies (1) three days after mailing when mailed, postage prepaid by United States mail, return receipt requested, or (2) at the time of delivery when delivered personally or by courier service to the Member Agency’s City or County Clerk during usual business hours at the principal office.

14.2 All notices to SBRHT shall be sufficiently given if made in writing and delivered either personally or by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the executive officer of SBRHT at the following address, or to such other address as may be designated to SBRHT for formal notice:
1170 W. Third Street
288

Page 10 of 12 ends

2 nd Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92410

15. Assignments; Other Agreements.

15.1 This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors of any Member Agency. No Member Agency may assign any right or obligation hereunder without the written consent of all other Member Agencies. Participation in SBRHT is not intended to preclude Member Agencies from entering into similar agreements with other jurisdictions.

16. Severability.

16.1 Should any part, term, portion, or provision of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, be held to be illegal or in conflict with any law of the State of California, or otherwise be rendered unenforceable or ineffectual, it shall be deemed severable, and the remainder of this Agreement or the application thereof to other persons or circumstances shall continue to constitute the agreement the Member Agencies intended to enter into in the first instance.

17. Headings.

17.1 All section headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only. They are not intended to define or limit the scope of any provision of this Agreement.

18. Non-Liability for Obligations of SBRHT.

18.1 The debts, liabilities, and obligations of SBRHT shall not be considered the debts, liabilities, or obligations of any Member Agency or its respective officers, agents, employees, representatives, or volunteers.
a. Assignment. Each Member Agency shall assign to the SBRHT its rights, title, and interest to recover damages from any third party for Claims (as defined in Subsection d below) arising out of this Agreement, to the extent that the SBRHT has met its obligations to defend and indemnify such Member Agency pursuant to this section.
b. Survival. SBRHT’s duty to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Member Agencies shall survive and continue in full force and effect after withdrawal of any Member from this Agreement, including as to the withdrawing Member Agency, or termination of this Agreement for any reason with respect to any Claims, as defined in 18.1.d., that occurred before the date of such withdrawal or termination.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 895 et seq., each Member Agency that is party to this Agreement shall be liable for its own negligent or wrongful acts or omissions and those of its officers, employees, and agents. d. Indemnification. The SBRHT shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless each Member Agency, its officers, agents, employees, representatives, and volunteers (the “Indemnitees”) from and against any loss, injury, claim, lawsuit, liability, expense, or damages of any kind or nature 289

Page 11 of 12 ends

(collectively, “Claims”) brought by a third party which arises out of or in connection with SBRHT’s acts and omissions related to its purposes set forth in this Agreement, including such third-party claims arising out of or in connection with any Indemnitees acting within their authorized capacity as an officer, agent, employee, representative, or volunteer of SBRHT. The SBRHT’s duty to defend and indemnify under this section shall not extend to Claims otherwise arising out of the Indemnitees’ own active negligence, omissions, or willful misconduct, whether in whole or part.
e. Liability Financing. The SBRHT shall finance its obligation pursuant to this Subsection by establishing a liability reserve fund, and/or by purchasing commercial insurance, and/or by joining a joint powers insurance authority (JPIA) as determined by the Board. In the event SBRHT’s financial obligations to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless, pursuant to this Subsection, exceed the liability reserve fund and/or the proceeds from any applicable insurance and/or JPIA coverage maintained by the SBRHT (hereinafter “Unfunded Liability”), the Member Agencies may provide for contribution or indemnification by any or all of the Member Agencies that are parties to the agreement upon any liability arising out of the performance of the agreement, and/or a Member Agency or Member Agencies may meet and confer with SBRHT in good faith to negotiate alternative means or mechanisms by which SBRHT may fund such Unfunded Liability; however, in no event shall the event of an Unfunded Liability relieve, limit, or waive SBRHT’s obligations of indemnity or defense to each Member Agency as first set forth above in this section. Nothing herein shall obligate any Member Agency to indemnify or hold harmless SBRHT for an Unfunded Liability or to make any contribution towards an Unfunded Liability. In no event shall any Unfunded Liability of the SBRHT be passed through to a Member Agency without the express, written, and voluntary approval of that Member Agency’s governing body via a separate instrument.

19. Governing Laws and Venues.

19.1 This Agreement is made in the State of California under the Constitution and laws of such State and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of California. The parties agree that any legal action, suit, or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be instituted and maintained exclusively in the state within the County of San Bernardino, California.

Each party irrevocably submits to the personal and subject matter jurisdiction of such courts and waives any objection to venue or forum non conveniens with respect to actions brought in those courts.

20. Confirmation of Jurisdictional Authority.

20.1 By signing this Agreement, the Member Agencies retain all jurisdictional authority granted to them by the State and/or their respective Charters. The powers and/or authority granted to SBRHT pursuant to this Agreement shall in no way serve to limit or restrict an individual Member Agency’s jurisdictional authority.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto by their duly authorized representative, have affixed their signatures on this Agreement, effective as of the date first stated above. 290

Page 12 of 12 ends

MEMBER AGENCY: [ENTER MEMBER AGENCY NAME]
By: ___________________________
[INSERT Name of Authorized Signatory, Title]
Attest: ________________________
[INSERT Name of Witness (e.g. Clerk), Title]
MEMBER AGENCY:

By: ___________________________
[INSERT Name Authorized Signatory, Title]
Attest: ________________________
[INSERT Name of Witness (e.g. Clerk), Title]
291
RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING, AUTHORIZING, AND DIRECTING CITY

EXECUTION OF THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT

RELATING TO MEMBERSHIP IN THE SAN BERNARDINO REGIONAL
HOUSING TRUST.

WHEREAS, The San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust (SBRHT) will be formed upon the approval of at least three qualified members as a joint powers authority between Member Agencies throughout the San Bernardino Council of Governments region (region); and
WHEREAS, SBRHT was created for the purpose of funding housing specifically assisting persons and families of extremely low-, very low-, low- and moderate-income levels within the region; and
WHEREAS, the City of Ontario is committed to increasing the supply of affordable housing and addressing the housing needs of residents across all income levels; and WHEREAS, the City of Ontario determined that there are limited financial resources available for affordable housing development and that additional local financing will increase the competitiveness of individual projects for the State and Federal resources; and
WHEREAS, the SBRHT provides an opportunity to raise and pool funds among Member Agencies to support the development of affordable and workforce housing including the development of financing, preservation and rehabilitation of such housing; and
WHEREAS, the City of Ontario finds it in their mutual economic interest to address the housing needs of their residents on a regional level; and WHEREAS, the City of Ontario determined that it is in the public interest and for the public benefit that the City of Ontario become a member of the SBRHT to further facilitate the development of affordable housing in the City of Ontario and throughout the region, including the financing of projects executed by the SBRHT; and WHEREAS, the City of Ontario will be joining other jurisdictions that are also members of the SBRHT in efforts to increase State and Federal resources for affordable housing directed to SBRHT; and
WHEREAS, the Agreement has been filed with the City of Ontario, and the members of the City Council, with the assistance of its staff, have reviewed said document; and
292
WHEREAS, the SBRHT is authorized to issue grants and loans to developers for the purpose, among others, of financing and refinancing the construction, acquisition, and rehabilitation of affordable housing; and
WHEREAS, the City anticipates there will be affordable housing projects in need of financing located in the City of Ontario; and
WHEREAS, the SBRHT shall be legally independent from City of Ontario, and its debts, liabilities, and obligations shall not constitute those of the City unless expressly agreed to by both parties; and
WHEREAS, local land use authority remains fully vested in City of Ontario, and nothing in the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement nor this resolution, shall be construed to transfer, limit, or otherwise affect the City’s sovereign authority over land use decisions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it to be in the best interest of the City of Ontario and its residents to join the SBRHT and support regional housing solutions.

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement, the City Council is authorized to appoint a member to serve on said Board;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it in the best interest of the City to appoint a qualified representative to this position;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that a City Council member is qualified to serve in this position and desires to appoint them to the Board;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the City of Ontario membership in the San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust (SBRHT).

SECTION 3. The City Council reviewed and approves of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement substantially in Exhibit “A” of this Resolution.

SECTION 4. The adoption of this Resolution shall not obligate the City of Ontario or any department thereof to (i) provide any financing to acquire, construct or operate any Project or any refinancing of any Project; (ii) approve any application or request for or take any other action in connection with any planning approval, permit or other action necessary for the acquisition, improvement, rehabilitation or operation of any Project; (iii) require any contribution or advance any funds whatsoever to the SBRHT other than membership fees for administrative costs; or (iv) except as provided in this Resolution, take any further action with respect to the SBRHT or its membership therein. 293
SECTION 5. The City Council, the City Clerk and all other proper officers and officials of the City of Ontario are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement and to perform such other acts and deeds, as may be necessary or convenient to affect the purposes of this Resolution and the transactions herein authorized.

SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall forward a certified copy of this Resolution and an originally executed Agreement to the SBRHT:

San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust
Attn: Monique Arellano
1170 West Third Street, 2nd Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92410
The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7
th day of April 2026.
_____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP

CITY ATTORNEY
294

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )

CITY OF ONTARIO )
I, SHEILA MAUTZ, City Clerk of the City of Ontario, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No. 2026- was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario at their regular meeting held April 7, 2026 by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
The foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2026- duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held April 7, 2026. _____________________________________

SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
295
Department: Planning
Prepared By: Rafael Torres
Department:

Prepared By: Rafael Torres
Staff Member Presenting: Rudy Zeledon,
Executive Director Community Development
Approved By:

Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 13
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE CENTERPARK SPECIFIC PLAN (FILE NO. PSP24-002)

CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
April 7, 2026
SECTION:

CONSENT CALENDAR
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt an Ordinance approving the CenterPark Specific Plan (File No. PSP24-002), appended to the attached Ordinance as "Attachment A", pursuant to the facts and reasons contained in the staff report and subject to the conditions of approval appended to the attached Ordinance as "Attachment B".

THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:

Operate in a Businesslike Manner
Invest in the Growth and Evolution of the City's Economy Focus Resources in Ontario's Commercial and Residential Neighborhoods FISCAL IMPACT: Adoption of the CenterPark Specific Plan will result in both short-term and longterm fiscal impacts to the City. Short-term impacts primarily involve the construction of infrastructure improvements needed to support the proposed development. The developer will be responsible for installing required improvements and/or paying the applicable Development Impact Fees (DIF) associated with these improvements at time of development. Long-term fiscal impacts include the ongoing provision of public services and maintenance, such as police, fire, and infrastructure maintenance, required to support the future development. Although the project will generate additional property tax revenue, the projected increase will not fully offset the cost of providing these services. To address this funding gap, future development of the Specific Plan area will require the developer(s) to form and/or participate in a Community Facilities District (CFD) to fund the additional public service costs associated with the development.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS: On March 17, 2026, the City Council introduced and waived further reading of an Ordinance approving the CenterPark Specific Plan. The Ontario Plan (“TOP”) Policy Plan (general plan) provides the basic framework for development within the 8,200-acre area commonly referred to as Ontario Ranch. The Policy Plan requires City Council approval of a Specific Plan for new developments of 10 acres or more within Ontario Ranch. A Specific Plan is required to ensure that sufficient land area is included to achieve cohesive, unified districts and neighborhoods. Additionally, a Specific Plan is required to incorporate a development framework 296
for detailed land use, circulation, infrastructure improvements (such as drainage, sewer, street and water facilities), provision for public services (including parks and schools), and urban design and landscape standards.

The CenterPark Specific Plan (File No. PSP24-002) represents the first step toward residential and mixed-use development in the western portion of Ontario Ranch, located west of Vineyard Avenue.

The Specific Plan area encompasses approximately 258 acres, generally bounded by Walker Avenue, Campus Avenue, Eucalyptus Avenue, and Ontario Ranch Road.

The proposed Specific Plan would allow for the development of up to 4,293 residential dwelling units, approximately 115,809 square feet of retail space, and up to 135,110 square feet of office development. The plan also provides for approximately 68 acres of open space, including a segment of Grand Park, as well as areas designated for non-recreational uses, including a Southern California Edison (SCE) easement.

Land Use and Development Standards. To facilitate future development, the Specific Plan will establish land use designations, development standards, and design guidelines for residential and commercial uses. The proposed land use designations include Medium Density Residential (146 acres), Mixed-Use (44 acres), Public Park/Open Space (56 acres), and Non-Recreational Open Space (12 acres). The development standards and design guidelines are intended to ensure high-quality development throughout the residential and mixed-use areas. These standards will promote attractive placemaking, strong circulation for pedestrians and vehicles, and high-quality architectural design and styles to create a cohesive and well-designed community.

The mixed-use areas will integrate residential development with a range of supportive commercial uses designed to serve both the immediate neighborhood and the surrounding community. These uses will provide convenient access to everyday goods and services, as well as opportunities for unique shopping and dining experiences. The mixed-use areas are strategically located at the intersection of Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue, a prime location that offers strong visibility and convenient access. In addition, the mixed-use areas are anchored by a segment of the future Grand Park, creating opportunities to establish an attractive destination for social gathering, shopping, dining, and community activities.

The Specific Plan will also ensure the community includes well-designed and highly functional amenities. This will be achieved through comprehensive landscape and open space standards, including requirements for private open space, paseos and trails, durable and attractive landscape palettes, and thoughtfully designed streetscapes that contribute to visually appealing and cohesive community spaces.

Infrastructure and Services. The backbone infrastructure needed to serve the entire Specific Plan area will be constructed by the developers in accordance with the Ontario Ranch Streets Master Plan and the Ontario Utilities Master Plan. The timing of development phases and the required infrastructure improvements will be established and approved through a future Development Agreement.

PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW: On February 24, 2026, the Planning Commission held a public 297
hearing on the proposed CenterPark Specific Plan and voted (7-0) recommending City Council approval of the Focused Environmental Impact Report including a Statement of Overriding Consideration and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and the CenterPark Specific Plan, File No. PSP24-002.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A Focused Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2025060731) along with a Consistency Determination Memo (as permitted through CEQA Guidelines Section 15183) was prepared for the proposed CenterPark Specific Plan. The Focused EIR addressed potential impacts to Historic Cultural Resources and Biological Resources and resulted in significant unavoidable impacts for both as follows:

Historic Resources - Even with the implementation of all feasible mitigation measures, the Specific Plan could result in the demolition or relocation of identified historic structures.

Under CEQA, this is considered a significant and unavoidable impact to Historic Resources.

Biological Resources – Several properties within the Specific Plan boundary were not accessible for property site surveys and technical studies. These areas are identified as Ownership Area 2. Since access could not be obtained, the potential impacts to Biological Resources are unknown and therefore could result, even with the implementation of all feasible mitigation measures, in a significant and unavoidable impact. However, as a mitigation, future development on these parcels will be required to complete the necessary studies as part of their project proposal.

The City also prepared a 15183 Consistency Analysis (which is an appendix to the Focused EIR), to document that the proposed Project is consistent with the City’s The Ontario Plan (TOP) 2050 and its associated Supplemental EIR. With the exception of potential impacts to historic and biological resources, the Project was adequately addressed in the TOP 2050 Supplemental EIR and does not represent a new or more severe significant impact, nor does it represent a new or more severe impact related to off-site infrastructure or cumulative impacts.

Although the Focused EIR provided mitigation measures for both Historic Resources and Biological Resources, the circumstances still resulted in significant unavoidable impacts. While mitigation of all potential impacts to a level of less than significant is desirable, the fact that some areas within the Project site will remain significant and unavoidable is not unexpected. The identification of these impacts as significant and unavoidable also supports and confirms the environmental analysis previously completed for The Ontario Plan 2050 Policy Plan EIR. 298

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA

SPECIFIC
PLAN
MONTH 2025
ORDINANCE NO. 0000
299
This page intentionally left blank
300

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA

SPECIFIC PLAN
CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MONTH DAY, 2026
FILE NO. PSP24-002
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX
301
This page intentionally left blank
302

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA

SPECIFIC PLAN
Submitted to:

CITY OF ONTARIO
303 East B Street
Ontario, California 91764
Submitted by :

SARES REGIS
3501 Jamboree Rd, Suite 3000
Newport Beach, California 92660
303
This page intentionally left blank
304

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA

SPECIFIC PLAN
Consultant Team:

T&B PLANNING, INC.
3200 El Camino Real, Suite 100
Irvine, California 92602

FUSCOE ENGINEERING
3257 E. Guasti Rd, Suite 300
Ontario, California 91761
305
This page intentionally left blank
306

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
i
table of contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-1

1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1-1

1.2 COMMUNITY VISION 1-1

1.3 RELATIONSHIP TO THE ONTARIO PLAN 1-5

1.4 GOVERNING DOCUMENTS 1-8

1.5 SPECIFIC PLAN COMPONENTS 1-8
SECTION 2: INTRODUCTION 2-1

2.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN 2-1

2.2 SPECIFIC PLAN VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2-2

2.2.1 Objective: Design CenterPark as a Living Community 2-2

2.2.2 Objective: Create a Comprehensive Circulation System for Multiple Modes of Travel 2-3

2.2.3 Objective: Provide for City-Planned Public Community Facilities and Services 2-3

2.2.4 Objective: Integrate Parks and Trails into the Framework of CenterPark 2-4

2.2.5 Objective: Compose “A Genius of Place” through Exceptional Planning and Distinct Architecture 2-4

2.3 PROJECT SUMMARY 2-5

2.3.1 Mixed-use Development 2-5

2.3.2 Residential Uses 2-5

2.3.3 Parks, Trails and Open Space 2-6

2.4 AUTHORITY AND REQUIREMENTS 2-7

2.4.1 Authority 2-7

2.4.2 Statutory Requirements of the Specific Plan 2-7

2.5 RELATIONSHIP TO THE ONTARIO PLAN (TOP) AND ZONING 2-8

2.5.1 The Ontario Plan (Policy Plan) 2-8

2.5.2 Zoning 2-8

2.6 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL 2-9

2.6.1 Specific Plan 2-9

2.6.2 Development Agreement 2-9

2.6.3 Subdivision Maps 2-9

2.6.4 Development Plan Review 2-10
307
ii

2.7 CEQA COMPLIANCE 2-10

2.8 AIRPORT INFLUENCE AREAS 2-10
SECTION 3: EXISTING CONDITIONS 3-1

3.1 PROPERTY OWNERSHIPS 3-1

3.2 WILLIAMSON ACT CONTRACTS 3-2

3.3 EXISTING ON SITE IMPROVEMENTS 3-3

3.4 SURROUNDING LAND USE CHARACTERISTICS 3-3

3.5 TOPOGRAPHY 3-11

3.6 EXISTING CIRCULATION AND ACCESS 3-12

3.7 EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE /UTILITIES / PUBLIC SERVICES 3-13

3.7.1 Potable Water 3-13

3.7.2 Recycled Water 3-13

3.7.3 Sewer 3-13

3.7.4 Drainage 3-14

3.7.5 Electricity 3-14

3.7.6 Natural Gas 3-14

3.7.7 Communication Systems 3-14

3.7.8 Solid Waste 3-14

3.8 HYDROLOGY 3-14

3.9 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 3-14

3.10 SEISMICITY 3-15

3.11 VEGETATION 3-15

3.12 EXISTING NPDES COMPLIANCE 3-15
SECTION 4: LAND USE PLAN 4-1

4.1 COMMUNITY DESIGN 4-1

4.2 MIXED-USE PLANNING AREAS 4-1

4.3 RESIDENTIAL PLANNING AREA 4-4

4.4 RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE 4-4
308

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
iii
table of contents
SECTION 5: INFRASTRUCTURE 5-1

5.1 CIRCULATION 5-1

5.1.1 Master Plan Roadways 5-2

5.1.1.1 Ontario Ranch Road 5-6

5.1.1.2 Grove Avenue 5-7

5.1.1.3 Walker Avenue 5-8

5.1.1.4 Campus Avenue 5-9

5.1.1.5 Bon View Avenue 5-10

5.1.1.6 Parco Avenue and Cucamonga Avenue 5-11

5.1.2 Local Streets 5-12

5.1.2.1 Private Streets 5-13

5.1.2.2 Common Drives, Private Drives and Alleys 5-14

5.1.3 Traffic Calming 5-15

5.1.3.1 Traffic Circles 5-16

5.1.3.2 Intersection Chokers 5-16

5.1.4 Pedestrian Circulation 5-16

5.1.5 City Master Planned Trails and Bikeways 5-16

5.1.6 Proposed Local Trails and Paseos 5-17

5.1.7 Parks 5-17

5.2 PUBLIC UTILITIES 5-20

5.3 POTABLE WATER PLAN 5-21

5.4 RECYCLED WATER PLAN 5-24

5.5 SEWER PLAN 5-28

5.6 DRAINAGE 5-32

5.6.1 NPDES Compliance 5-32

5.7 FIBER OPTICS 5-36

5.8 GRADING CONCEPT 5-38

5.9 SCHOOLS 5-40

5.10 NATURAL GAS 5-40

5.11 ELECTRICITY 5-40

5.12 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 5-42
309
iv
SECTION 6: DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 6-1

6.1 INTRODUCTION 6-1

6.2 DEFINITION OF TERMS 6-1

6.3 APPLICABILITY 6-1

6.4 ADMINISTRATION 6-1

6.5 GENERAL SITE DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 6-2

6.6 PERMITTED USES AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 6-3

6.6.1 Permitted Uses 6-3

6.6.2 Residential Development Standards 6-6

6.6.3 Use and Benefit Easements 6-22

6.7 MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 6-23

6.8 RESIDENTIAL PARKING STANDARDS 6-24

6.8.1 Off-Street Parking Requirements 6-24

6.9 OPEN SPACE/AMENITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 6-26

6.10 LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 6-28

6.10.1 General Provisions 6-28

6.10.2 Landscape Standards 6-29

6.11 SIGNAGE 6-30

6.11.1 Master Sign Program Contents 6-30

6.12 LIGHTING 6-31

6.12.1 Street Lights along Public Streets 6-31

6.12.2 Alley Lighting Fixtures 6-31

6.12.3 Lighting within Parks, Paseos, Tot Lots, and Other Recreational Areas 6-31

6.13 PARK FURNITURE 6-31

6.14 BUS SHELTERS 6-31

6.15 MAILBOXES 6-31
310

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
v
table of contents
SECTION 7: COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES 7-1

7.1 INTRODUCTION 7-1

7.2 GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER 7-1

7.2.1 Sustainability 7-1

7.2.2 Architectural Character 7-2

7.3 ARCHITECTURAL CONTEXT 7-3

7.3.1 Traditional Influences 7-5

7.3.2 Spanish Influences 7-6

7.3.3 Southern California Influences 7-10

7.3.4 Art Deco/Modern Influences 7-12

7.3.5 Adaptive Traditional Influences 7-14

7.3.6 Transitional Southern European Influences 7-16

7.3.7 Transitional Southern California Influences 7-18

7.4 MASSING PRINCIPLES 7-20

7.4.1 Front Articulation 7-20

7.4.2 Side Articulation 7-21

7.4.3 Rear Articulation 7-21

7.4.4 Roof Forms 7-22

7.4.5 Balconies and Projections 7-22

7.4.6 Building Composition 7-23

7.4.7 Front Porches and Entry Courtyards 7-23

7.5 GARAGE PLACEMENT 7-24

7.6 MATERIALS AND DETAILS 7-25

7.6.1 Wall Materials/Finishes 7-25

7.6.2 Accent Materials 7-26

7.6.3 Doors and Windows 7-26

7.6.4 Roofing Materials and Slope 7-27

7.6.5 Eaves, Fascias and Rakes 7-28

7.6.6 Exterior Colors 7-28

7.7 ADDITIONAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 7-28

7.8 MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL/OFFICE GUIDELINES 7-29

7.8.1 Architectural Design 7-30

7.8.1.1 Guiding Principles 7-30

7.8.1.2 Site Planning 7-31

7.8.1.3 Building Design 7-32
311
vi

7.9 COMMUNITY STRUCTURES 7-34

7.10 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER 7-34

7.11 FRAMEWORK STREETSCAPE DESIGN 7-35

7.12 LANDSCAPE STREETSCAPE TREATMENT 7-37

7.12.1 Ontario Ranch Road 7-38

7.12.2 Grove Avenue 7-40

7.12.3 Walker Avenue 7-42

7.12.4 Campus Avenue 7-44

7.12.5 Bon View Avenue 7-46

7.12.6 Cucamonga Avenue 7-46

7.12.7 Parco Avenue 7-48

7.12.8 Grand Park Avenue 7-48

7.12.9 Neighborhood Streets 7-48

7.12.10 Private Drives 7-50

7.12.11 Common Drives/Alleys 7-52

7.13 ENTRIES AND MONUMENTATION 7-56

7.13.1 Community Entry and Monumentation 7-57

7.13.2 Mixed-Use Intersection Monumentation and Signage 7-60

7.14 PARKS, PASEOS, AND PRIVATE RECREATION AREAS 7-63

7.14.1 City of Ontario Grand Park 7-63

7.14.2 Neighborhood Parks 7-64

7.14.3 Local Parks 7-66

7.14.4 Landscape Design 7-68

7.14.4.1 Minimum Landscape Requirements 7-68

7.14.4.2 Landscape and Open Space Design 7-70

7.15 COMMUNITY WALLS AND FENCING 7-72

7.15.1 Community Walls 7-72

7.15.2 Solid Walls and Fencing 7-72

7.15.3 Open View Fencing 7-72

7.16 OUTDOOR LIGHTING 7-75

7.17 COMMUNITY PLANT PALETTE 7-75

7.17.1 Plant Matrix 7-75

7.17.2 Prohibited Plant Material 7-75
312

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
vii
table of contents
SECTION 8: IMPLEMENTATION 8-1

8.1 METHODS AND INTERPRETATION 8-1

8.2 APPLICABILITY 8-1

8.3 INTERPRETATION 8-1

8.4 SEVERABILITY 8-1

8.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF DESIGN GUIDELINES 8-1

8.6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS 8-2

8.6.1 Subdivision Maps 8-2

8.6.2 Development Plan 8-2

8.6.3 Development Agreement 8-2

8.7 TRANSFER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 8-2

8.8 SPECIFIC PLAN MODIFICATIONS AND AMENDMENTS 8-3

8.8.1 Minor Modifications 8-3

8.8.2 Specific Plan Amendments 8-3

8.9 VARIANCES 8-4

8.10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 8-4

8.11 COMPLIANCE WITH MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN 8-4

8.12 PROJECT PHASING 8-4

8.12.1 Mixed-Use Development 8-4

8.12.2 Residential Development 8-4

8.12.3 Infrastructure 8-6

8.12.4 Public Regional Park 8-6

8.12.5 Private Parks 8-6

8.12.6 Community Facilities and Services 8-6

8.13 APPEALS 8-6

8.14 PROJECT FINANCING 8-7

8.14.1 Facilities and Services 8-7

8.14.2 Operation and Maintenance 8-7

8.15 MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES 8-7

8.15.1 Public Maintenance 8-7

8.15.2 Homeowners Association 8-9
313
viii
SECTION 9: GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY 9-1
LAND USE ELEMENT 9-1
COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT 9-3
COMMUNITY ECONOMICS ELEMENT 9-8
MOBILITY ELEMENT 9-9
HOUSING ELEMENT 9-10
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES ELEMENT 9-11
SAFETY ELEMENT 9-14
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT 9-15
SOCIAL RESOURCES ELEMENT 9-16
COMMUNITY ECONOMICS ELEMENT 9-17
314

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
ix
table of contents

EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 1-1 REGIONAL LOCATION MAP 1-2
EXHIBIT 1-2 VICINITY MAP 1-3
EXHIBIT 1-3 LAND USE PLAN 1-6
EXHIBIT 2-1 CHINO AIRPORT INFLUENCE AREA 2-11
EXHIBIT 3-1 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS 3-1
EXHIBIT 3-2 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND WILLIAMSON ACT CONTRACT STATUS 3-2 EXHIBIT 3-3 EXISTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES 3-4
EXHIBIT 3-4 EXISTING CONDITIONS KEYMAP 3-5
EXHIBIT 3-5 EXISTING SITE TOPOGRAPHY 3-11
EXHIBIT 4-1 LAND USE PLAN 4-2
EXHIBIT 5-1 CITY OF ONTARIO ROAD CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 5-4 EXHIBIT 5-2 CONCEPTUAL CIRCULATION PLAN 5-5
EXHIBIT 5-3 ONTARIO RANCH ROAD 5-6
EXHIBIT 5-4 GROVE AVENUE 5-7
EXHIBIT 5-5 WALKER AVENUE 5-8
EXHIBIT 5-6 CAMPUS AVENUE 5-9
EXHIBIT 5-7 BON VIEW AVENUE 5-10
EXHIBIT 5-8 PARCO AVENUE AND CUCAMONGA AVENUE 5-11
EXHIBIT 5-9 LOCAL STREETS 5-13
EXHIBIT 5-10 COMMON DRIVES, PRIVATE DRIVES AND ALLEYS 5-14 EXHIBIT 5-11 CONCEPTUAL PEDESTRIAN AND REGIONAL TRAIL CIRCULATION PLAN 5-18 EXHIBIT 5-12 INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PLAN 5-19
EXHIBIT 5-13 CONCEPTUAL POTABLE WATER PLAN 5-22
EXHIBIT 5-14 CONCEPTUAL POTABLE WATER SYSTEM 5-23
EXHIBIT 5-15 CONCEPTUAL RECYCLED WATER PLAN 5-26
EXHIBIT 5-16 CONCEPTUAL RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM 5-27
EXHIBIT 5-17 CONCEPTUAL SEWER PLAN 5-30
EXHIBIT 5-18 CONCEPTUAL SEWER SYSTEM 5-31
EXHIBIT 5-19 CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN 5-34
EXHIBIT 5-20 CONCEPTUAL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 5-35
EXHIBIT 5-21 FIBER OPTIC MASTER PLAN 5-36
EXHIBIT 5-22 FIBER OPTIC PLAN 5-37
EXHIBIT 5-23 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN 5-39
EXHIBIT 5-24 EXISTING ON-SITE FACILITIES 5-41
315
x
EXHIBIT 6-1 CONVENTIONAL SFD 6-7
EXHIBIT 6-2 Z LOT/ZERO LOT SFD 6-8
EXHIBIT 6-3 LARGE CLUSTER SFD 6-9
EXHIBIT 6-4 SMALL CLUSTER SFD 6-10
EXHIBIT 6-5 COURTYARD SFD 6-11
EXHIBIT 6-6 COTTAGE SFD 6-12
EXHIBIT 6-7 DUPLEX/TRIPLEX SFD 6-13
EXHIBIT 6-8 TOWNHOME/ROWTOWN SFA 6-14
EXHIBIT 6-9 AUTOCOURT SFA 6-15
EXHIBIT 6-10 COURTYARD TOWNHOMES 6-16
EXHIBIT 6-11 3 STORY PODIUM SFA 6-17
EXHIBIT 6-12 TUCK UNDER APARTMENT/CONDOMINIUM 6-18
EXHIBIT 6-13 MOTORCOURT APARTMENT/CONDOMINIUM 6-19
EXHIBIT 6-14 WRAP MULTI-FAMILY 6-20
EXHIBIT 6-15 PODIUM MULTI-FAMILY 6-21
EXHIBIT 6-16 USE AND BENEFIT EASEMENTS 6-22
EXHIBIT 7-1 TRADITIONAL INFLUENCES 7-7
EXHIBIT 7-2 SPANISH INFLUENCES 7-9
EXHIBIT 7-3 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INFLUENCES 7-11
EXHIBIT 7-4 ART DECO/MODERN INFLUENCES 7-13
EXHIBIT 7-5 ADAPTIVE TRADITIONAL INFLUENCES 7-15
EXHIBIT 7-6 TRANSITIONAL SOUTHERN EUROPEAN INFLUENCES 7-17 EXHIBIT 7-7 TRANSITIONAL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INFLUENCES 7-19 EXHIBIT 7-8 GARAGE PLACEMENT 7-24
EXHIBIT 7-9 LANDSCAPE FRAMEWORK PLAN 7-36
EXHIBIT 7-10 ONTARIO RANCH ROAD STREETSCAPE 7-39
EXHIBIT 7-11 GROVE AVENUE STREETSCAPE 7-41
EXHIBIT 7-12 WALKER AVENUE STREETSCAPE 7-43
EXHIBIT 7-13 CAMPUS AVENUE STREETSCAPE 7-45
EXHIBIT 7-14 BON VIEW AVENUE STREETSCAPE 7-47
EXHIBIT 7-15 NEIGHBORHOOD STREET STREETSCAPE 7-49
EXHIBIT 7-16 PRIVATE DRIVES SECTIONS 7-51
EXHIBIT 7-17 PRIVATE DRIVE PARKING 7-53
EXHIBIT 7-19 ENHANCED DRIVEWAY/COMMON DRIVES AND ALLEY PAVING DETAIL 7-55 EXHIBIT 7-18 COMMON DRIVES/ALLEYS 7-55
EXHIBIT 7-20 COMMUNITY MONUMENTATION (LEFT SIDE) 7-58
EXHIBIT 7-21 COMMUNITY MONUMENTATION (RIGHT SIDE) 7-59
316

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
xi
table of contents
TABLES
TABLE 1-1 LAND USE PLAN SUMMARY 1-7
TABLE 4-1 LAND USE PLAN SUMMARY 4-3
TABLE 5-1 STUDENT POPULATION 5-40
TABLE 6-1 ALLOWABLE LAND USES 6-4
TABLE 6-2 MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 6-23
TABLE 6-3 OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS 6-25
TABLE 6-4 OPEN SPACE/AMENITIES STANDARDS 6-26
TABLE 7-1A PLANT MATRIX - TREES 7-76
TABLE 7-1B PLANT MATRIX - SHRUBS 7-77
TABLE 7-1C PLANT MATRIX - GROUNDCOVERS AND VINES/ESPALIER 7-78 TABLE 7-2 PROHIBITED PLANT LIST 7-78
TABLE 8-1 MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES 8-8
TABLE 9-1 POLICY PLAN CONSISTENCY 9-1
EXHIBIT 7-22 MIXED USE INTERSECTION MONUMENTATION AND SIGNAGE 7-61 EXHIBIT 7-23 CONCEPTUAL NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 7-65
EXHIBIT 7-24 ILLUSTRATIVE LOCAL PARK 7-67
EXHIBIT 7-25 COMMUNITY WALL AND FENCE PLAN 7-73
EXHIBIT 7-26 WALL AND FENCE DETAILS 7-74
EXHIBIT 8-1 PHASING PLAN 8-5
317
xii
This page intentionally left blank
318

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
1-1
executive summary
SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW
The CenterPark Specific Plan is a proposal for a new planned community on approximately 257.34 acres within the City of Ontario. The community of CenterPark will provide a pedestrian friendly mixed-use retail/office center and up to 4,293 new residential dwelling units within thirteen distinct planning areas designed in conjunction with a comprehensively planned open space system consisting of regional and neighborhood park facilities. The Specific Plan area is bounded to the north by a Southern California Edison (SCE) Easement corridor located approximately 330 ft. north of Ontario Ranch Road, the planned Grand Park to the south, Campus Avenue to the west, and Walker Avenue to the east. The regional context and local setting of the CenterPark Specific Plan are illustrated in Exhibit 1-1, Regional Location Map and Exhibit 1-2, Vicinity Map.

1.2 COMMUNITY VISION
The relationship between man and nature; between the human spirit and the transcending effect that open space has on every human sense – is the inspiration for CenterPark. Alexander Pope, an English poet of the 18th century, penned a satirical prose to describe the British aristocracy and their landscape treatment on large estates and public open spaces that tried to emulate Versailles and other ornamental garden designs that were popular at the time. Instead, he advanced the idea that landscape design should respond to nature.

His advice: “Consult the genius of place in all”. This ideology is widely used in discussions about the sense of place or inherent character of the landforms, landscapes and environmental conditions and systems to describe our relationship with our surroundings.
“Genius of Place” describes the concept of learning from nature’s genius in a specific area or location.

In design, it is applied to the vision of reflecting on the landscape character of the past and, in some cases, reintroducing or integrating nature into the built environment. In other cases, the natural history and landscape character can be replicated in design to create a unique sense of place rooted in nature. The vision for the CenterPark Specific Plan embraces the positive relationship between people and open space, the benefits of one’s environment and surrounding beauty on the human condition.

Fredrick Law Olmstead, the co-creator of
Central Park in Manhattan, the grounds of
the 1893 Chicago World’s Fair and several
other regional and destination parks of
national prominence and considered to be a
pioneer in the field of landscape architecture,
claimed late in his career:
“The root of all my good work is
an early respect for, regard and
enjoyment of scenery”
Fredrick Law Olmstead
319
1-2
N

NOT TO SCALE
EXHIBIT 1-1 REGIONAL LOCATION MAP

PROJECT
SITE
320

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
1-3
executive summary
EXHIBIT 1-2 VICINITY MAP

PROJECT
SITE
N

NOT TO SCALE
321
1-4
Olmstead developed a series of Design Principles in his ambition to use landscape design to meet deep human needs extending the influence of landscape beyond garden decoration within a process he termed the “elegance of design” – the creation of a composition in which all parts were subordinate to an overall, single, coherent effect. The master planned vision for CenterPark is to create an elegant composition of homes and neighborhoods, combined with mixed-use opportunities for employment, retail, dining, entertainment experience, and recreational open space and scenery into a singular balance.

Throughout his career, Olmstead sought to exploit benefits of open space on society in general with his understanding of the relationship between community and recreational and cultural needs. He had visions of vast recreational and cultural achievements in the hearts of cities. He did not see parks as just vast meadows, but rather he saw them as places of harmony; places where people would go to escape life and regain their sanity. He wanted these parks to be available to all people. “If we analyze the operations of scenes of beauty upon the mind, and consider the intimate relation of the mind upon the nervous system and the whole physical economy, the action and reaction which constantly occur between bodily and mental conditions, the reinvigoration which results from such scenes is readily comprehended. The enjoyment of scenery employs the mind without fatigue and yet exercises it; tranquilizes it and yet enlivens it; and thus, through the influence of the mind over the body gives the effect of refreshing rest and reinvigoration to the whole system.”
The master planned community at CenterPark is reminiscent of Olmstead’s vision for parks and recreational spaces integrated into the city core and available to all people. The community framework follows his principles of elegant design where development and open space are subordinate elements within an overall balance. CenterPark offers parks, trails and landscaped open spaces within walking and biking distance of all residential neighborhoods.

The plan for CenterPark establishes individual neighborhoods sited with tree-lined streets that encourage walking within and between neighborhoods. Residences are planned to front onto streets and open spaces including larger regional facilities and local neighborhood parks, recreational features and passive open space/gathering areas. A collection of smaller residential enclaves are intended to seamlessly integrate into overall character and “genius of space” envisioned for the CenterPark Community.
322

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
1-5
executive summary

1.3 RELATIONSHIP TO THE ONTARIO PLAN
The Ontario Plan 2050 (TOP) Exhibit LU-01, Land Use Plan designates the CenterPark Specific Plan area (Specific Plan area) as Mixed-Use, Medium Density Residential (11.1 - 25.0 dwelling units per acre) and Open Space/Parkland. The Specific Plan Area is within the Chino Airport Overlay Zone. The Specific Plan area is zoned SP/AG (Specific Plan AG preserve), requiring approval from the City for development within the CenterPark Specific Plan area.

Based on the land use designations established with The Ontario Plan 2050 (TOP) Land Use Element, the following development requirements apply to the Specific Plan area:
• Mixed-Use. Mixed-Use development comprised of 10% Office with a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.70, 20% Retail with a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.30 and 70% Residential with a maximum density of 35 dwelling units per acre, is allowed. The Ontario Plan (TOP) allows up to 135,110 sq. ft. of office development, 115,809 sq. ft. of retail development and a maximum of 1,086 residential dwelling units within the Mixed-Use Planning Area of the CenterPark Specific Plan. • Residential. Residential Medium Density development at 11.1 - 25.0 dwelling units per acre per The Ontario Plan adjusted gross acre is allowed. The TOP proposes 93.6 acres of Medium Density Residential land uses. At a target density of 22.0 du/ac, the TOP allows up to 3,207 total units. • Open Space - Parkland. The TOP Land Use Plan depicts approximately 67.26 adjusted gross acres of Parkland.
• Parks. A minimum of 2 acres of Parkland per 1000 residents is required as part of the proposed residential development. The actual on-site park acreage requirement will be established with approval of future Tentative Tract Maps.

The CenterPark Land Use plan is illustrated in Exhibit 1-3, Land Use Plan. The CenterPark Specific Plan serves as the land use, zoning regulations and guidelines governing development of a new master planned community within the 257.34 acre Specific Plan area.
323
1-6
Eucalyptus Ave
Campus Ave
Edison Ave/
Ontario Ranch Rd
Cucamonga Ave
Sultana Ave
Bon View Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Campus Ave
Bon View Ave
Cucamonga Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Baker Ave Baker Ave
Sultana Ave
Edison Ave/
Ontario Ranch Rd
1 MDR

15.91 AC
2 MDR

15.57 AC
3 MDR

7.70 AC
4 MU

7.13 AC
5 MU

7.41 AC
6 MDR

7.33 AC
10 MU

14.10 AC
11 MU

15.67 AC
7 MDR

23.67 AC
8 MDR

24.20 AC
9 MDR

12.18 AC
12 MDR

15.46 AC
13 MDR

23.75 AC
14 OS-R

13.33 AC
15 OS-R

13.11 AC
16 OS-R

9.90 AC
18 OS-R

13.44 AC
17 OS-R

6.20 AC
19 OS-NR

2.26 AC
20 OS-NR

2.68 AC
21 OS-NR

2.96 AC
22 OS-NR

3.38 AC
Specific Plan Boundary
MDR Medium Density Residential
MU Mixed-Use
OS-R Open Space-Recreation
OS-NR Open Space-Non Rec

FULL ACCESS

POTENTIAL ACCESS POINT
EXHIBIT 1-3 LAND USE PLAN
N
324

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
1-7
executive summary
TABLE 1-1 LAND USE PLAN SUMMARY
PA LAND USE TOP 2050

ACREAGE

DENSITY PER
EIR

MAXIMUM
UNITS

MAXIMUM
RETAIL

MAXIMUM
OFFICE
1 MDR (11.1 - 25.0 DU/AC) 15.91 AC 22.0 DU/AC 350 DU
2 MDR (11.1 - 25.0 DU/AC) 15.57 AC 22.0 DU/AC 343 DU
3 MDR (11.1 - 25.0 DU/AC) 7.70 AC 22.0 DU/AC 169 DU
4 MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL 4.99 AC 35.0 DU/AC 175 DU
4 MIXED-USE RETAIL 1.43 AC 18,635 SF
4 MIXED-USE OFFICE 0.71 AC 21,741 SF
5 MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL 5.19 AC 35.0 DU/AC 182 DU
5 MIXED-USE RETAIL 1.48 AC 19,367 SF
5 MIXED-USE OFFICE 0.74 AC 22,595 SF
6 MDR (11.1 - 25.0 DU/AC) 7.33 AC 22.0 DU/AC 161 DU
7 MDR (11.1 - 25.0 DU/AC) 23.67 AC 22.0 DU/AC 521 DU
8 MDR (11.1 - 25.0 DU/AC) 24.20 AC 22.0 DU/AC 532 DU
9 MDR (11.1 - 25.0 DU/AC) 12.18 AC 22.0 DU/AC 268 DU
10 MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL 9.87 AC 35.0 DU/AC 345 DU
10 MIXED-USE RETAIL 2.82 AC 36,852 SF
10 MIXED-USE OFFICE 1.41 AC 42,994 SF
11 MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL 10.97 AC 35.0 DU/AC 384 DU
11 MIXED-USE RETAIL 3.13 AC 40,955 SF
11 MIXED-USE OFFICE 1.57 AC 47,781 SF
12 MDR (11.1 - 25.0 DU/AC) 15.46 AC 22.0 DU/AC 340 DU
13 MDR (11.1 - 25.0 DU/AC) 23.75 AC 22.0 DU/AC 523 DU
RESIDENTIAL TOTAL 176.79 AC 24.3 DU/AC 4,293 DU
RETAIL TOTAL 8.86 AC 115,809 SF
OFFICE TOTAL 4.43 AC 135,110 SF
14 OS-R (PARKLAND) 13.33 AC
15 OS-R (PARKLAND) 13.11 AC
16 OS-R (PARKLAND) 9.90 AC
17 OS-R (PARKLAND) 6.20 AC
18 OS-R (PARKLAND) 13.44 AC
19 OS-NR (NON-RECREATION) 2.26 AC
20 OS-NR (NON-RECREATION) 2.68 AC
21 OS-NR (NON-RECREATION) 2.96 AC
22 OS-NR (NON-RECREATION) 3.38 AC
OPEN SPACE TOTAL 67.26 AC
PROJECT TOTAL 257.34 AC 16.7 DU/AC 4,293 DU 115,809 SF 135,110 SF RETAIL in Mixed-Use areas = 20% of Mixed-Use acreage x 0.30 FAR OFFICE in Mixed-Use areas = 10% of Mixed-Use acreage x 0.70 FAR 325
1-8

1.4 GOVERNING DOCUMENTS
Development of CenterPark will be governed by the following planning and zoning documents:
• The Ontario Plan 2050 (TOP) which establishes policies governing land use, circulation, housing, conservation and open space, noise, safety and public facilities within the CenterPark Specific Plan area. • The CenterPark Specific Plan which serves as the zoning regulations for the Specific Plan area and includes a Land Use Plan, Infrastructure Plan, Design Guidelines, Development Regulations and plans for implementation of development within CenterPark.
• The City of Ontario Development Code which shall govern where the CenterPark Specific Plan is silent. • ONT/Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Document.
• The City of Ontario Subdivision Ordinance which shall regulate the subdivision of land within CenterPark.
• Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s) to be established by the developers of CenterPark which shall provide a means of ensuring and enforcing quality design and development of the master planned community.
• Development Agreements which establish assurances that regulations contained within the Specific Plan will be in force during approved timelines and that development of public facilities within the CenterPark Specific Plan will occur pursuant to the terms and conditions approved by the City. • The CenterPark Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report which evaluates the environmental impacts resulting from implementation of the development proposal and identifies methods to eliminate or reduce impacts to a less than significant level and a means for monitoring the methods through the development and operation of the project.

1.5 SPECIFIC PLAN COMPONENTS
In addition to Section 1, Executive Summary, the CenterPark Specific Plan is organized into the following sections:

SECTION 2 - INTRODUCTION
The Introduction serves to acquaint the reader with:
• The Specific Plan vision and objectives,
• The purpose of the Specific Plan,
• A general description of the project proposal,
• The authority and requirements of the Specific Plan,
• The entitlements required to implement development within the Specific Plan; and • The relationship of the CenterPark Specific Plan to The Ontario Plan 2050 (TOP) and Ontario Development Code.
326

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
1-9
executive summary
SECTION 3 - EXISTING CONDITIONS
The physical setting for CenterPark is described in this section outlining the existing physical conditions in and around the Specific Plan area.

SECTION 4 - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
This section describes the land use plan proposal and the necessary infrastructure and public services required as part of development of the proposed project. A summary of the City’s land use and planning policies and regulations governing development of the Specific Plan area is provided with a description of the CenterPark land use plan including a detailed description of each residential and mixed-use planning area, the type and number of residential dwelling units and other uses allocated to each planning area and the areas allocated to the site, park sites and the system of trails planned within the community.

SECTION 5 - INFRASTRUCTURE
This section provides information in circulation improvements, planned backbone water, sewer, and storm drain systems, the grading concept for the project and a discussion of public facilities to serve the project site.

Information on the infrastructure improvements to be constructed as part of project development is provided in this section to include a description of the planned circulation improvements, water, sewer, storm drain and water quality improvements, the grading concept for the development of the project, and a discussion of public utilities and services planned for CenterPark
SECTION 6 - DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
Development Regulations to govern allowable uses and regulate development of allowable land use within the Specific Plan are established in this section. The relationship of the CenterPark Specific Plan development regulations to the City of Ontario Development Code is also discussed. The policies and procedures for the City’s review and approval of specific development projects proposed within CenterPark subsequent to Specific Plan approval are established in this section.

SECTION 7 - DESIGN GUIDELINES
The CenterPark Design Guidelines, which are intended to direct the site planning, landscaping, and architectural quality of the development are established in this section. Streetscapes, entries, edge treatments, walls and fencing, lighting, signage and architectural design are some of the features to be addressed in the Design Guidelines.

SECTION 8 - IMPLEMENTATION
The policies and procedures for the City’s review and approval of specific development proposals, within the CenterPark Specific Plan, are established in this section. This section provides the methods and procedures for interpreting and amending the CenterPark Specific Plan as necessary. A summary of project financing and project maintenance responsibilities for new development within the Specific Plan area is provided in this section.

SECTION 9 - GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This section provides a matrix comparing the goals and policies of The Ontario Plan 2050 (TOP) applicable to the Specific Plan and the consistency of the CenterPark Specific Plan to each policy of The Ontario Plan 2050. 327
This page intentionally left blank
328

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
2-1
introduction
SECTION 2: INTRODUCTION
The CenterPark Specific Plan is a comprehensive plan for development of a balanced community consisting of neighborhood commercial, varied residential and a variety of open space uses on approximately 258 acres in the City of Ontario. The site is located within a region known as the Ontario Ranch, which is transitioning from historical agricultural uses to urban development. The site is bounded by a SCE Easement located approximately 330 ft. north of Ontario Ranch Road, and by Campus Avenue on the west and Walker Avenue on the east.

CenterPark is designed in a village concept comprised of several distinct residential neighborhoods, all located within walking and biking distance to mixed-use areas and public and private parks. The Community is focused around a large centrally located regional park that comprises approximately 56.0 acres and extends from Campus Avenue on the western boundary across the entire site to the eastern boundary at Walker Avenue. This central regional park is part of a larger, City-wide parkland element that connects the City’s Grand Park on the eastern end of the Ontario Ranch to the future Mixed-Use activity area designated on The Ontario Plan 2050 (TOP) at the southeast corner of Ontario Ranch Road and Euclid Avenue.

2.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN
The purpose and intent of the CenterPark Specific Plan is to comprehensively describe the proposed commercial, residential and open space/recreational land uses planned for the project site. An ordinance adopting the CenterPark Specific Plan establishes the zoning for the proposed planned development and defines the permitted uses, development regulations, design guidelines governing future development as well as the procedures and requirements to approve and implement that development in a manner consistent with the City of Ontario Plan (TOP) General Plan.

The purpose and intent of the CenterPark Specific Plan is established on the following guiding principles:
• Establish a comprehensive land use plan and development standards designed to address the unique features of the Specific Plan area;
• Implement the City’s goals and policies as established in The Ontario Plan (TOP) for the Specific Plan area and establish a mechanism for the implementation of the AG/SP zoning designation for the Specific Plan area;
• Establish design guidelines to guide the City’s review and approval of subsequent development applications for Mixed-use and residential development projects such as subdivision maps, development plans, landscape plans, grading plans, and building plans; and • Provide a plan that ensures development of the Specific Plan area is accomplished in a uniform and cohesive manner.
329
2-2

2.2 SPECIFIC PLAN VISION AND OBJECTIVES
The vision for CenterPark is established through the following key objectives which will result in the design and development of a traditional, walkable community that encourages an outdoor lifestyle, promotes interaction among neighbors and provides a sense of place and community identity for residents.

2.2.1 Objective: Design CenterPark as a Living Community CenterPark is designed as a livable community consisting of unique neighborhood commercial and retail development, distinct residential neighborhoods and a park and open space system that are functional, emphasize social interaction and are identifiable through implementation of the following community design features:
• Locally serving commercial neighborhood designed to be identifiable to the surrounding community and integrated into the overall planned development, visually and physically connected. • A traditional village setting comprised of a series of neighborhoods designed with a pattern of smaller, walkable blocks that promote access, activity and safety. • Neighborhood streets designed in a simple grid-like system creating short blocks to promote a neighborhood feeling.
• Streets incorporating traffic-calming techniques such as landscaped areas adjacent to roadways and City approved intersection chokers intended to encourage drivers to reduce their speed and create a pedestrian friendly environment.
• Landscaped parkways adjacent to sidewalks separated from the curb to create a pedestrian friendly environment.
• Diversity in architectural design and homes fronting the street with varying lot sizes to enhance the pedestrian experience and instill a sense of place and belonging for residents. • A choice of housing types provided to address a diversity of lifestyles and varying economic segments of the marketplace.
• Residential floor plans that encourage views onto the street, de-emphasize the visual and physical dominance of garages and provide front porches and courtyards along the street to encourage interaction and activity along streets and sidewalks.
• A system of parks providing active and passive recreation facilities, passive open space areas and walkway connections for informal neighborhood interaction. • Pedestrian and bicycle connectivity among all residential neighborhoods, areas and parks within CenterPark through a comprehensive network of pedestrian walkways and bicycle trails offering opportunities for walking and biking throughout the entire community and to destinations outside of the community.
330

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
2-3
introduction

2.2.2 Objective: Create a Comprehensive Circulation System for Multiple Modes of Travel
Street design within CenterPark strengthens connectivity and enhances community identity through improvements to the public right of way such as entry monuments, street trees, landscaped parkways, decorative street lighting and street furniture. Parks and open space areas are connected with the surrounding neighborhoods by walkways and trails providing connectivity and accessibility to future residents and the general public. The plan for CenterPark provides a system of streets designed for the safe and efficient movement of automobiles while also improving walkability and biking opportunities through the following community design features:
• Neighborhood street patterns that provide access between neighborhoods and discourage through traffic. • A local street system that is logical and understandable for the user avoiding circuitous and confusing travel paths between internal neighborhood areas and adjacent arterials. • Streets designed to include landscaped parkways and pedestrian walkways separated from the street encourage walking and social interaction.
• Local streets designed to slow vehicular traffic to promote walkability through the use of traffic-calming devices, landscaped areas adjacent to streets and narrowed intersections to influence a driver’s peripheral vision and encourage drivers to proceed more slowly.
• A system of City-wide and local bike ways integrated into the design of the community to encourage bicycle travel as an alternative to the automobile.
• Neighborhoods and parks that are linked by pedestrian paths and greenways which also serve to establish connective and gathering features within and between neighborhoods in the CenterPark Specific Plan area.

2.2.3 Objective: Provide for City-Planned Public Community Facilities and Services The CenterPark Specific Plan provides for the development of required public facilities to serve the community as follows:
• New water, sewer, storm drain and water quality facilities consistent with City’s Technical Master Plans. • Development of new bike paths as part of project development providing links of a public bike trail system consistent with the City’s Bikeway Master Plan.
• Provision of 56 acres of regional open space – parkland to allow for a centrally located regional public open space facility.
• Development of new on-site parks at a ratio of 2 acres of developed park space per 1,000 residents including the development of private parks within the community and smaller pocket parks within each neighborhood.
331
2-4

2.2.4 Objective: Integrate Parks and Trails into the Framework of CenterPark The master plan for CenterPark will provide new parks, trails and landscaped open space areas to enhance the public realm and provide outdoor recreational opportunities for residents of CenterPark and the surrounding community as follows:
• Provision of a central regional park to include recreational amenities such as playgrounds, gathering areas, walking trails and other public amenities consistent with the City of Ontario programming for future public parks and subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. • Development of privately maintained neighborhood parks, community facilities, pocket parks and open space trails and walkways within each neighborhood.
• Proposed amenities will include open park spaces, passive and active park areas and greenbelts to provide a diversity of open spaces that meet the needs of the community. • Improvement of landscaped open space within the neighborhood edges to include pedestrian trails adjacent to public arterial and collector streets.

2.2.5 Objective: Compose “A Genius of Place” through Exceptional Planning and Distinct Architecture
Diverse and varied architecture combined with comprehensive site planning within CenterPark will produce neighborhoods that have aesthetic and functional harmony, preserve residents’ privacy and encourage neighborhood interaction. The Design Guidelines for CenterPark provides a strong sense of place through the following community design features.
• Architectural theme and place-making incorporated into buildings, streetscape furniture/ design elements, lighting and signage creating an overall community character. • Individual interpretation of the overall intended community character within the commercial center and individual neighborhoods to encourage diversity of architecture within an overall planned aesthetic theme. • Homes designed at a human scale with porches, stoops and walkways providing gathering places for neighbors and encouraging interaction among neighbors.
• A variety of home styles within the Specific Plan area, all of which are located within walking and biking distance to the parks.
• Homes oriented to the street and comprised of a variety of architectural styles adding interest to the street scene, creating a unique walking experience and encouraging neighborhood interaction along the street. • Traditional building types with views of garage doors minimized through setback requirements, location, design elements and landscaping.
• Streets linked together in a manner which is pedestrian-friendly but also auto-accessible enabling residents to either walk or bike from neighborhoods to the parks. 332

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
2-5
introduction

2.3 PROJECT SUMMARY
The CenterPark Land Use Plan is outlined in Section 1’s Table 1-1, Land Use Plan Summary and described below.

2.3.1 Mixed-use Development
Mixed-Use development comprised of 10% Office with a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.70, 20% Retail with a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.30 and 70% Residential with a maximum density of 35 dwelling units per acre, is allowed. The Ontario Plan (TOP) allows up to 135,110 sq. ft. of office development, 115,809 sq. ft. of retail development and a maximum of 1,086 residential dwelling units within the Mixed-Use Planning Area of the CenterPark Specific Plan.

2.3.2 Residential Uses
A variety of residential housing types may be developed up to 5 stories maximum height. The maximum allowable units within the CenterPark Specific Plan is not to exceed 4,293 units. The blending of residential densities within the plan is encouraged as long as the density within any one planning area does not exceed 35 du/ac in the mixed-use zone and does not exceed 25 du/ac in the overall Specific Plan area.

The following housing types are allowed within the Specific Plan area:
• Conventional SFD - 2 Story. This housing type includes conventional single family neighborhoods, traditional single-family and cluster SFD neighborhoods, including condominium developments, with 1 and 2 story buildings.
• Small Lot/Cluster SFD - 2/3 Story. This housing type includes conventional single-family neighborhoods, traditional single-family and cluster SFD neighborhoods, including condominium developments, with buildings up to 3 stories tall.
• Attached SFA - 2 Story. This housing type includes duplexes/paired homes, triplexes, townhomes/ rowtowns and stacked flats, including condominium and apartment developments, with buildings up to 2 stories tall.
• Attached SFA - 3 Story. This housing type includes duplexes/paired homes, triplexes, townhomes/ rowtowns and stacked flats, including condominium and apartment developments, with buildings up to 3 stories tall.
• Attached SFA/Multi-Family - 3+ to 5 Story. This housing type includes attached homes, including condominium and apartment developments, with buildings greater than 3 stories tall with a maximum of 5 story buildings.
333
2-6

2.3.3 Parks, Trails and Open Space
The CenterPark open space concept is oriented around a large public regional park comprised of

55.98 acres. The plan includes a system of private parks that will be well distributed throughout the Specific Plan area, within the residential neighborhoods. Each private park will have a minimum of

0.25 acres and include a variety of facilities to serve the needs of the future residents.

Enhanced neighborhood edges will include pedestrian walkways providing connectivity to and from the Specific Plan area and to the street, separated public sidewalks, private pedestrian walkways and pathways to be developed within the community, connecting all residential neighborhoods to the central park and several private parks.

Parks provided on-site will be consistent with TOP. Actual required park acreage will be determined at the time of tentative tract map approval.

An overall Conceptual Open Space Plan and Program will be developed and approved concurrently with each subdivision map in each Planning Area. At a minimum the plan will indicate the location and size of parks proposed within the map area and will include proposed amenity features within the area to be mapped as well as amenity program listing the proposed facilities for the private amenities within the remainder of the Specific Plan area.

The Grand Park will be designed and constructed per the Ontario Grand Park Conceptual Master Plan.

The developer and the City of Ontario will work together to ensure that the public regional park will be constructed concurrently with the build-out of the Specific Plan in a phased manner. The details of this partnership will be included in the development agreement accompanying the approval of the Specific Plan. 334

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
2-7
introduction

2.4 AUTHORITY AND REQUIREMENTS

2.4.1 Authority
State of California Government Code, Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8, Section 65453 and 65353 grants authority to cities to adopt Specific Plans for purposes of implementing the goals and policies of their General Plans. The Government Code specifies that Specific Plans may be adopted either by resolution or by ordinance and that the Specific Plan is required to be consistent with the General Plan. When adopted by the City of Ontario by ordinance, the CenterPark Specific Plan shall establish the land use and zoning regulations for development of the Specific Plan area.

2.4.2 Statutory Requirements of the Specific Plan
California Government Code Section 65451 mandates that a Specific Plan be structured as follows:

1. A Specific Plan shall include a text and a diagram or diagrams, which specify all of the following in detail:
• The distribution, location and extent of the uses of land, including open space, within the area covered by the plan;
• The proposed distribution, location, extent and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy and other essential facilities proposed to be located within the area covered by the plan and needed to support the land uses described in the plan;
• Standards and criteria by which improvements will proceed, standards for the conservation, development and utilization of natural resources, where applicable; • A program of implementation measures including regulations, programs, public works projects and the financing measures necessary to carry out 1, 2 and 3 above; • A statement of the relationship of the Specific Plan to The Ontario Plan (TOP) - General Plan.

The CenterPark Specific Plan meets the requirements of the State of California Government Code. 335
2-8

2.5 RELATIONSHIP TO THE ONTARIO PLAN (TOP) AND ZONING

2.5.1 The Ontario Plan (Policy Plan)
The Ontario Plan (TOP) designates the Specific Plan area for the following land uses:
• Mixed-use development comprised of 10% Office with a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.70, 20% Retail with a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.30 and 70% Residential with a maximum density of 35 dwelling units per acre, is allowed. The Ontario Plan (TOP) allows up to 135,110 sq. ft. of office development, 115,809 sq. ft. of retail development and a maximum of 1,086 in mixed-use units. • Medium Density Residential (11.1 to 25.0 dwelling units per acre) with a minimum of 1,603 residential units and a maximum development capacity of 3,207 residential units. The CenterPark Specific Plan proposes a maximum average overall density of 22.0 units per the TOP Adjusted Gross Acreage consistent with the City’s TOP policies. The table below provides a breakdown of the number of units allowed per Planning Area.
• A 55.98 acre public regional park within the CenterPark Specific Plan. • Private improved parks at a ratio of 2 acres per thousand population. The CenterPark Specific Plan provides for development of private parks, greenbelts and trails consistent with the City’s TOP policies.

The CenterPark Specific Plan Land Use Plan is consistent with The Ontario Plan 2050 (TOP). For more detailed information, see the Policy Consistency Matrix in Section 9.

2.5.2 Zoning
The City of Ontario has zoned the Specific Plan area as SP/AG (Specific Plan/AG preserve).

The zoning designation of “SP” requires approval of a Specific Plan to implement the goals, policies and objectives of The Ontario Plan. The CenterPark Specific Plan is designed to meet the requirements of the State of California Government Code and The Ontario Plan. The City of Ontario will adopt the CenterPark Specific Plan by ordinance, thereby establishing the land use and zoning regulations for the development of the Specific Plan area. The requirements of the Specific Plan shall take precedence over the City of Ontario Development Code. In instances where the Specific Plan is silent, the City of Ontario Development Code shall prevail.
336

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
2-9
introduction

2.6 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL

COMPONENTS
The components of the development approval process for projects within CenterPark are discussed below.

2.6.1 Specific Plan
The CenterPark Specific Plan, when adopted, provides the land use and development standards and zoning regulations for the Specific Plan area. It serves as a “blueprint” for development by establishing the distribution of land use and criteria for development as set forth herein. The CenterPark Specific Plan also serves as the legal document to implement the General Plan goals, objectives and policies established in The Ontario Plan for the Specific Plan area.

2.6.2 Development Agreement
Unless developed in a coordinated manner and with adequate fiscal planning, development projects within the City are likely to present a challenge in their implementation due to the lack of existing public facilities that include streets, sewage, transportation, drinking water, schools and utility facilities. California law establishes a mechanism for ensuring the adequate provision of such facilities while providing assurances to applicants that, upon project approval, applicants can proceed with their projects.

Approval of the CenterPark Specific Plan will be followed by an application for approval of development agreements to encourage investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning as envisioned by the City, which seeks to maximize efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public. A statutory development agreement, authorized pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65869.5 et seq., shall be required as part of the approval of the CenterPark Specific Plan.

The development agreements shall include, but not be limited to, methods for financing acquisition and construction of infrastructure, acquisition and development of adequate levels of parkland and schools, as well as the provision of adequate housing opportunities for various segments of the community consistent with the City’s regional housing needs assessments.

The above mentioned development agreements must be fully approved prior to or concurrent with the approval of any Tentative Tract Map submitted within this Specific Plan area.

2.6.3 Subdivision Maps
A tentative tract map(s) will be submitted by the applicant for approval by the City of Ontario for the CenterPark Specific Plan area indicating the approximate location of lot lines, streets and proposed grading.

Following approval by the City of the tentative tract map(s), a final map(s) will be prepared for acceptance by the City. The final map(s) becomes a legal document that is recorded and defines legal parcels and lots that can be sold for development.
337
2-10

2.6.4 Development Plan Review
All development proposals for individual Planning Areas within the CenterPark Specific Plan will be subject to the Development Plan Review process pursuant to the City’s Development Code.

2.7 CEQA COMPLIANCE
A Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the City of Ontario for the CenterPark Specific Plan, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), evaluates impacts associated with the Specific Plan and subdivision map(s). The EIR recommends mitigation measures to reduce impacts of the project to a less than significant level. The EIR serves as the required CEQA environmental review for the Specific Plan and provides a basis for the required CEQA environmental review of all subsequent discretionary and ministerial actions.

2.8 AIRPORT INFLUENCE AREAS

ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
The Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ONT ALUCP) was adopted by the Ontario City Council on April 19, 2011. The purpose of a compatibility plan is to avoid conflicts between airport operations and surrounding land uses. The Specific Plan area is not within the safety, noise impact or airspace protection zones of the ONT ALUCP; however, it is within the Airport Influence Area, as is the entire City of Ontario.

CHINO AIRPORT
On August 2, 2022, the City Council of the City of Ontario approved and adopted a Development Code Amendment to establish the Chino Airport (“CNO”) Overlay Zoning District (“OZD”) and Reference I, Chino Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (“CNO ALUCP”). The CNO OZD and CNO ALUCP established the Airport Influence Area for Chino Airport, solely within the City of Ontario and limits future land uses and development within the Airport Influence Area, as they relate to safety, airspace protection and overflight impacts of current and future airport activity. The CNO ALUCP is consistent with policies and criteria set forth within the Caltrans 2011 California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. The Specific Plan is located within the Airport Influence Area of Chino Airport, Overflight Notification Zone and Airspace Protection Zone.
338

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
2-11
introduction
EXHIBIT 2-1 CHINO AIRPORT INFLUENCE AREA
N

SEAGULL A

MALCOLM ST

PINTO PL

OAK HILL ST

TAM O' SHANTER CT

BON VIEW AVE

GOLDCREST AVE

GARF EI LD AVE

HOPE AVE

TAYLOR PL

CALDWELL
P
P
L
HOENIX

PL BANYAN ST
C
GOLD

CREST PBL

ANYAN ST

GARFIELD
PL

MALCOLM
AVE

RAYMOND PL

CHERRY HILL ST

HAZELTINE
CT

HAZELTINE
CT
GREEN

WOOD PL

CALAVER A S PL

TAM O SHANTER

PARKSIDE DR

V RI GIN AI WY

MARIGOLD WAY

ST ANDREWS ST

DEERFIELD ST

VIRGINIA PL

MERION S T MARIGOLD WY DORAL CT

MERION CT
AMADOR

CALDWELL AVE

PHOEN XI AVE

MERION ST

DORAL CT

MILDRED PL

PARCO AVE

COTTONWOOD ST COTTONWOO D ST

MERION CT

DORAL CT

SANDPIPER AV DEEERFIELD ST

MILDRED PL

DEL NORTE AVEMAIDSTONE ST

ST ANDREWS ST

IMPERIAL

LASSEN AVE

BERMUDA
DUNES
ST

WALKER AVE

BERMUDA DUNES ST

HARBOUR AVE

CASTLE MAIDSTONE
ST

COTTONWOOD ST

CA RNOUSTIE CT

PALM AVE

FERN AV
P
T
H
G
G
GH

MARIGOLD PL

HOLMES PL
MILD
BANYAN

DEL NORT E AVE

OAK HILL

SANDPIPER P
MI PE

R AI L PL

BANYAN ST

LAKE AVE

BERMUDA DUNES ST

TAM O SHANTER

LASSEN AVE

SPYGLASS CT
DORAL
CT

COSTACT

INVERNESS
CT

MERION DR

CASTLE HARBOUR PL

MEADOW B ROOK PL

CASCADES CASCADES TR PINEHURST CT

AUGUSTA AVE

DORAL ST

MERION ST

RIVERSIDE DR

M RI AMONTE A

OAKHILL ST

BANYAN CT PLEASANT A

MALCOLM AV

SULTANA AVE

TAM O'SHANTER ST

M RI AMONTE
PL

MONTEREYPL

TAM O'SHANTER ST

BERMUDA DUNES ST

MONTEREY

CHERRY HILL
ST

DORAL ST

DUNES CT

MERION ST

MALCOLMAVE

CONCORD PL

OAK HILL CT

BANYAN ST

CHERRY HILL ST

OAK HILL CT

P NI EHURST

BANYAN CT

TAM O SHANTER

HAZELTINE ST

AUGUSTA AVE

BROOKSIDE ST

ST ANDREWS PL
BANYAN

QUAKER RIDGE PL

OAK HILL CT

CHERRY HILL ST

PRAR EI DUNES PL

BANYAN ST

HILL ST

BOCA RATON CT

TIARA AVE

BALBOA AVE

VALENCIA AVE
CHERRY

SAN DIEGO PL

SACRAMENTO
PL
PEBBLE
BEACH
CT
BALBOA

WHISPERING
LAKES

NI VERNESS

BROOKSIDE DR

ST ANDREWS DR

BAKER AVE

DIVERSA DR

TAM A RASK DR W H ISPERING LAKES LN

SANDPIPER AVE HAZELTINE ST

DEL NORTE PL

ST ANDREWS CT MILDRED PL

AMADOR PL

OAKH I LL DR
V ERAS
TE PL

FIRECRES
W
AR
WA
HA
BROOK

COTTONWOOD TR

COTTONWOOD
S
SHORES
RD

ARCADIAN

COLON AI L AVE

COG HIL

DUNES ST

CYPRESS POINT PL CYPRESS POINT PL

PINE VALLEY AVE

ARCADIAN SHORES RD

SURREY WY

NORTH S

LONGHORN

WRA N GLER PL

OL D A RC HIBALD RAN

LEMON AVE

PLUM AVE

CHERRYPL CHERRY AVE

CHERRY HILL
CT
WY

DORAL ST

PLUM LN

COTTONWOOD ST
CHERRY

PLUM LNBANYAN ST
CP

OAKHILL ST

FERN AV
E R
CT

BER M UDA DUNES CT

CORMORANT DR

BLUE JAY WAY

LAUREL ST

BERMUDA DUNES ST BERMUDA DUNES ST BERMUDA DUNES ST

VINEYARD AVE BERMUDA DUNES CT

HARBOUR TOWN TR

CANTERBURY

COLONIAL AVE CANTERBURY

RICHMOND ST

BROOKSIDE ST

O AK HILL DR

WALNUT ST

W I L MINGTON DR

COLON AI L AVE

SEA SI LAND PL

DOVER PL

LEXINGTON PL
TAM O'

SHANTER

HAZELTINE ST

COGHILL ST

DUNES ST

PINE VALLEY AVE

CEDAR R DI GE DUNES ST

DESERT FOREST AVE

CEDAR RIDGE
ST. ANDREWS ST

OAKMONT ST

T URNSTONE AVE

TAM O SHANTER

WALNUT ST

DUNLIN WY

BI G RANGE RD

WRANGLER PL WRANGLER PL

PALOMINO PL

MUSTANG DR

BLACK HORSE DR

BURNING T

MUSTANG PL

PALOMINO PL

PINTO PL

TUMBLEWEED ST

CHAPARR AL ST

EUCLID AVE

RIVERSIDE DR

GROVE AVE

RIVERSIDE DR

ARCHIBALD

ARCAD AI N SHORES RD

OAK HIL
TURNS

ARCHIBALD AVE

LEMON PL

CHINO AVE CHINO AVE CHINO AVE CHINO AVE CHINO AVE

ONTARIO

EUCALYPTUS AVE

MERRILL AVE MERRILL AVE

BON VIEW AVE

CUCAMONGA AVE

CHINO AVE CHINO AVE

CHINO AVE

BAKER AVE

CHINO AVE

GROVE AVE GROVE AVE GROVE AVE GROVE AVE

BON VIEW AVE

EDISON AVE

BON VIEW AVE BON VIEW AVE BON VIEW AVE

CAMPUS AVE

EDISON AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

EUCLID AVE EUCLID AVE EUCLID AVE EUCLID AVE EUCLID AVE

DEERFIELD ST

CHERRY AVE
GOLDEN
SILVER

OLD ARCHIBALD RANCH RD STALLION W
RO

RODEO PL
SHORES
RD

ARCADIAN
JOSHU

DUNES ST

LAUREL VLY LN

SEA SI LAND TR

CONCORD AVE

MERION ST PLUM LN

DEERFIELD CT
ST. ANDREWS ST

DORAL ST MONTEREY AVE

DEERFIELD ST

TAM O'SHANTER ST
ST. ANDR EWS ST

PLEASANT AVE

HAZELTINE ST

BLUE JAY WAY

HAZELTINE ST

WINDSOR ST

CONCORDAVE

CHERRY AVE

COTTONWOOD ST

GOLDCREST PL DORAL CT

DEERFIELD ST

HOLMES AV HOLMES PL

GARFIELD AVE

DUNES ST

HOPE AVE

DEERFIELD ST

CUCAMONGA AVE

GREENWOOD ST

TAYLOR AVE

AR A B IAN PL

CLYDESDALE ST

ARCADIAN SHORES AV

BURNING TREE DR

NORTH SHORE

GROVE AVE

WALKER AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE

CARPENTER AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE ARCHIBALD AVE

MERRILL AVE

CARPENTER AVE

ONTARIO RANCH RD

EUCALYPTUS AVE

MERRILL AVE

EDISON AVE

WALKER AVE WALKER AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

EDISON AVE

VINEYARD AVE

WALKER AVE

ONTARIO AVE ONTARIO AVE

COTTONWOOD CT

PARKSIDE AV

VIRGINIA PL

COTTONWOOD CT
ST. ANDREWS ST
R
P

WALNUT ST

WALNUT ST WALNUT ST

SCHAEFER AVE SCHAEFER AVE SCHAEFER AVE SCHAEFER AVE SCHAEFER AVE

VIA RUA RIO

VIA RUA FLORES

V AI BELAMAR AI

ARBOR LN

MERRIL AVE

KENSINGTON AVE ROSE PETAL WY

WICKFORD ST

OXFO RD L N

M CCLEVE W Y WEST
M

CENTE NNIAL CI WEST C E

VICTORY LN

HE RI TAG E PAS
CROWN
CT

PRIMROSE PL

SALISBURY WY

DEVONSHIRE LN

PARKPLACE AVE PARKV

PARKPLACE AVE
L

VICTORIA ST COTTAGE

GARDEN WY

PLYMOUTH AVE NEWTON AVE

COLONIAL AVE

SALEM ST

NORWICH ST

DANBURY ST

COLCHESTER ST

BENNINGTON ST

LEWISTON ST

DARIEN ST

BOUNTIFUL TR

GRAPEVINE TR

ROSEMARY WY

THOMPSON ST

DERBY LN

WILLIAMSBURG LN BARNVELDER

WYANDOTTE

ORPINGTON

TANGERINE WAY

APRICO T W A

AGRARIAN ST Y

BORDEAUX DR

BOWERY PL WILSHIRE RD
PEN
BOU
ABB
GRA

BROADWAY AV

CANAL WY

SCOTT WY

ROGERS WY

WAYNE AV

KEN T W Y

DIAN A WY

BAN NER ST

MUR DOC K LN

PARKER LN

HOWLETT LN

DRYDEN AV

KINGSTON AV

MANITOBA PL

OTTAWA AV

CORNWALL ST

EDMONTON ST

ALBERTA ST

SARNIA ST

WINNIPEG AV
SILVER

COPPERH

SU SSEX

BR ESSEPASEO

JAVAPASEO

CLEMENTINE
DR

AVOCADO
TR

STAR K LN

KENDALL LN TRELLIS WY

BODEGA WY

CELLARS
WY

HELLMAN AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

OLIVIA WY

BLAIRE WY

CHARLOTTE AV

LOLA AV

STELLA AV

ELLIE AV

CORA WY

SCARLETT LN SCARLETT LN

MABEL LN MABEL LN

CLARA LN CLARA LN

HARPER ST HARPER ST

PENELOPE LN PENELOPE LN

PARKVIEW ST

REESE WY

ANSLEY AV

AVERY AV

TATUM LN

HARLOW LN
MAE WY

EMBRY LN

IVY AV IVY AV

PIPER WY

HAZELST

VIOLET LN

PHEASANT
CRANE
KIWI
M

WREN EADOWLARK

TANAGER

HALTON PRIV

BASANITE AV

SHALE AV

DOLOMITE ST

BROCKRAM DR

KINGLET AV

MADELEINE

PRIVADO
JOSEPH

PRIVADO
LENA

PRIVADO SCHMIDT PRIVADO

SU NSTONE
8j
8i
5 4
8h
8g

S GROVE

S EUCLID

E CHINO

E RIVERSIDE

E MERRILL

E EDISON

E SCHAEFER
S V
I

E EUCALYPTUS

E EDISON E EDISON
y
8f
8e
CHINO

AIRPORT

PROJECT SITE
N

RANCIS ST

CHABLIS AVE

CLARK ST

ONTARIO MILLS PARKWAY

ELPHIA ST

ETIWANDA AVE ETIWANDA AVE ETIWANDA AVE

S ET WI ANDA

N ETIWANDA

NTA ANA
is
ea
www.ontarioplan.org
LEGEND
Retail/Service
General Commercial (0.4 FAR)
Neighborhood Commercial (0.4 FAR)
Mixed Use
Districts

1. Downtown

2. Airport Metro/Entertainment

3. Guasti

4. South Euclid

5. South Employment
Corridors

6. East Holt Blvd

7. Inland Empire Blvd
Neighborhood Centers
8a. Mountain and 6th
8b. Mountain and 4th
8c. Mountain and Holt
8d. Euclid and Francis
8e.Euclid and Walnut
8f. Euclid and Riverside
8g. Grove and Chino
8h. Grove and Edison
8i. Vineyard and Edison
8j. Parkside
Mixed Use
Residential
High Density (25.1 - 45 du / ac)
Medium Density (11.1 - 25 du / ac)
Low-Medium Density (5.1 - 11 du / ac)
Low Density (2.1 - 5 du / ac)
Rural (0 - 2 du/ac)

CHARDONNAY CT
(private drainage road)

ROCHESTER AVE
OP
CREEK
D

Y CREEK

GRAEAGLE

MILL CREEK

M A D R VR RD

KINGS RVR LN

AMERICAN RIVER RD

SAN LORENZO RVR RD

GREYSTONE DR

BRENTSTONE ST

HARTFORD ST MONO CK

SH ERWIN CK PL WY

SALMON RIVER DR OWENS RIVER
LN
McGEE CK LN

YUBA RIVER
DR
WY
CK PL

HOLCOMB
T
WAY

EEL RIVER PL

BRU S H CK PL SALT CK WY
McCLOUD RVR LN

RUSSIAN RVR DR

YUBA RIV DR

BOISE CK PL

DOUBLEDAY AVE
R

YUBA RIVER DR

MERCED RIVER RD
McCLOUD RIVER RD

TRUCKEE RVR

MILLIKEN AVE

STANFORD AVE

DUPONT AVE

COLORADO RVR RBD

UTTE CK PL
McCLOUD R VI ER RD

STONE CK

SILVERADO

CREEK PL

KLAMATH RIVER DR

FOX CK LN

E CREEK DR

DOUBLEDAY AVE

JURUPA ST

ZINFANDEL CT

VANDERBILT ST

HUDSON AVE

FRANCIS ST FRANCIS ST

CHAMPAGNE AVE FRANCIS ST

CHABLIS AVE

CLARK ST

JURUPA ST

VINTAGE AVE

SANTA ANA ST

MALAGA PL

SARAH PL SARAH PL

JURUPA ST

AUTO C ENTER DR
McNAMARA ST

WINEVILLE AVE

AUTO CENTER DR

ROCHESTER AVE

WANAM AKER AVE

WALL ST

WOODR U FF WAY

ROCKEFELLER AVE

LOWELL ST

SANTA ANA ST

DUPONT AVE

DO UB LED AY AVE

SANTA ANA ST
NY ST

SEQUOIA AVE

AIRPORT DR

CLEVELAND AVE

GUASTI RD

BRICKELL ST

AIRPORT DR

BRICKELL ST

BRICKELL PRIVADO

WANAMAKER AVE

ONTARIO MILLS PARKWAY

GIBRALTAR ST

AIRPORT DR

ONTARIO MILLS PARKWAY

V NI TAGE AVE

FRANKLIN
AVE

ONTARIO
MILLS
DR

MILLS CIRCLE

ONTARIO MILLS PARKWAY

AND EMPIRE BLVD

FERRARI L N
MALL
DR

MILLS CIRCLE GURNEE
AVE

FR A N KLIN AVE

ONTARIO M IL LS DR ROCHESTER AVE

W NI EVILLE AVE
DR

MISSION BLVD

DUPONT AVE
ST

MILLIKEN AVE
ONTARIO FWY (I-15)

MILLIKEN AVE MILLIKEN AVE
ONTARIO FWY (I-15)

PHILADELPHIA ST

W NI EVILLE AVE

BURGUNDY PL

PHILADELPHIA ST

ETIWANDA AVE ETIWANDA AVE ETIWANDA AVE

FOURTH ST

BARR NI GTON AVE
ONTAR OI FWY (I-15)
SAN BERNARDINO FWY (I-10)

SHEA DR
T

PACIFIC

PRIVADO

SLATER CIR

MILL CK

GUASTI RD

MOTOR LN
NE DR

CLEVELAND AVE

CHINO AV

VIA ASTI

V AI ALBA

VIA PIEMONTE

VIA TURIN

VILLAGIO

IO CENTER PARKWAY

KETTERING DR

MERCE PARKWAY

COMMERCE PARKWAY

TOYOTA WY

CONCOURS ST

EDENGLEN AVE

AUBURN WY

DNI L CALLAWAY DR

ENWOOD DR

HERITAGE LN

GROVELAND DR

COTTAGE WY

EDENGLEN AVE

QU NI CY WY

EDENGLEN AVE

HAMPSHIRE DR BETHANY WY

EMORY LN

OAKWOOD DR

EDENGLEN AVE

TULANE WY

HAMPTON WY

BRADLEY LN

CLAREMONT DR

WESTMONT LNHAMILTON WY

CAMBRIDGE DR

HAMNER AVE HAMNER AVE

ONTARIO RANCH RD

MILL CREEK AV
TNER

ALMOND BLOSSOM ST

CRISANTA PRIVADO PEONY PASEO

SAGE PASEO CLIFTON AV

HO LLYHOCK PASEO

HISBISCUSPASEO

CRISANTA PRIVADO

HEATHER PRIVADO

MILL CREEK AV

AMHERST AV

VENTURA AV

SUNSET ST

LA JOLLA ST

CATALINA ST
RIA

ENC NI TI AS AVE
AVILA

PRIVADO

CHATHAM ST

CLIFTON ST
2 2

E AIRPORT

S MILLIKEN S HAMNER

S ET WI ANDA

E PHILADELPHIA

E INLAND EMPIRE

S VINTAGE

N M LI L KI EN

N ETIWANDA

S WINEVILLE

E SANTA ANA

E JURUPA
ON
IT LU-01

USE PLAN
Note: The City of Ontario in its entirety is
located within the Airport Influence Area
of Ontario International Airport.

An area in which current or future
airport-related noise, overflight, safety,
or airspace protection factors may
significantly affect land uses or necessitate
restriction on those uses.

Refer to the Ontario Airport Land
Use Compatibility Plan for further
information.

Note: The location of the 350 plus acre
Great Park designatedas Open Space –
Parkland in Ontario Ranch
(area south of Riverside Drive) and the
approximate 5- acre Lakes (designated
as Open Space – Water) are conceptual.

Refer to Figure PR- 1 – Park Facilities for
further detail on existing and conceptual
park locations in Ontario Ranch.
www.ontarioplan.org
LEGEND
Other
Landfill
Rail
Airport
Public School
Public Facility
Open Space - Water
Open Space - Parkland
Open Space - Non-Recreation
Employment
Industrial (0.55 FAR)
Business Park (0.6 FAR)
Retail/Service
Hospitality (1.0 FAR)
Office Commercial (0.75 FAR)
General Commercial (0.4 FAR)
Neighborhood Commercial (0.4 FAR)
Mixed Use
Districts

1. Downtown

2. Airport Metro/Entertainment

3. Guasti

4. South Euclid

5. South Employment
Corridors

6. East Holt Blvd

CHARDONNAY CT
(private drainage road)

DRIFTWOOD PL

NORTHSHORES PL

ROCHESTER AVE

SEAGULL AVE

FAIRFIELD ST

CRYSTAL SPGS PL

ROCK SPGS PL

OAK SPRINGS PL

FOX GLEN LP

ACORNGLENN PL

GLENN PLBADGER

FO X GLEN LP LYTLE CREEK LP

BEAR CK

LYT LE C R EEK LOOP

H ONEYGLENN WY

ALISO CREEK
CREEK

OA K HILL DR PONY DR

PINTO PL

CRYSTAL
LK CT

PA R K GLENN WY
CT

COLD CK WY

TIARA AVE
CT

DIVERSA DR
ASK DR
KES LN

FIRECREST CT

WOODLARK DR

ARCADIAN SHORES RD

WALNUT ST

HAZELTINE ST

PEACHTREE PL
DR

PEACHTREE
PL

BROOKSIDE CT

COTTONWOOD TR

COTTONWOOD CT

ST ANDREWS DR

PEACHTREE

PL DUNES ST

MERION ST

PLA NI F EI LD
DR

PEACHTREEP
N
L
ORTH

SHORES DR
SHORES
NORTH
SHORES
RD

ARCADIAN

TURNER AVE

PLAINFIELD DR

COLON AI L AVE

COG HILL CT COG HILL CT

DUNES ST

CYPRESS POINT PL CYPRESS POINT PL

PINE VALLEY AVE

ARCADIAN SHORES RD

SURREY WY

GREENBRIAR DR

BRONCO DR

NORTH SHORE D

LONGHORN ST R

PEACHTREE PL

NORTH SHORE DR

PLAINFIELDDR

BLACK HORSE DR

TURNER AVE

PONY DR STA LLION WY

COLT WY

WRA N GLER PL

BLACK HORSE DR

CHAPARRAL ST

ROCKY PL

CLOVER WY

PEACHTREE
LN

OL D A RC HIBALD RANCH RD

G R EY F OX LN

HARBOUR TOWN TR

CANTERBURY

COLONIAL AVE CANTERBURY

RICHMOND ST

BROOKSIDE ST

O AK HILL DR

P NI E VALLEY

WALNUT ST

W I L MINGTON DR

COLON AI L AVE

SEA SI LAND PL

DOVER PL

LEXINGTON PL
TAM O'

SHANTER

HAZELTINE ST

COGHILL ST

DUNES ST

PINE VALLEY AVE

CEDAR R DI GE DUNES ST

DESERT FOREST AVE

CEDAR RIDGE
ST. ANDREWS ST

OAKMONT ST

T URNSTONE AVE

TAM O SHANTER

WALNUT ST

DUNLIN WY

BI G RANGE RD

WRANGLER PL WRANGLER PL

PALOMINO PL

MUSTANG DR

BLACK HORSE DR

CENTUR OI N WY

LAGO ST
WOOD

OAKLEAF
CT
RD

POPLAR DR

WOOD CT

MORNING
ST. TROPEZ DR

BISON WY

FAWN CT

BLUE FOX DR
WY

ANTELOPE

RE NI DEER LN
PL
DE
CRYS

ER CREEK LOOP TAL LK RD
WY

PINECONE

REDPINE PL

RIPPLING BROO K PL CARIB OU PL

CLEAR LA KE RD

ELSINORE WY

ANTLER RD
GINGER

GLENN RD
CEDAR
SHADOW
WARM

SODA SPRINGS
CT
CK WY

SPGS CT

ASH G ATE WY

MI L ANO ST
GENOA

ASHGATE PL

ASHGATE CT

S U MMER ISLAND

APPLEWOOD DR
NECTAR

CREEKSIDE DR

ALDER CREEK DR

OAK C REEK DR

O A K C R EEK

OAK CREEK

STRAWBERRY CREEK PL

ADLER CK

TUOLUMNE

CT CEDARGLEN

LAURELTREE DR GINGERWOOD RD

OAKLEAF RD
MORNINGWOOD CT

SCOUT CT

PEACHTREE PL

BURNING TREE DR MUSTANG PL

PALOMINO PL

PINTO PL

TUMBLEWEED ST

CHAPARR AL ST

COLD SPRINGS PL
WAY

RUSH CREEK SAN LORENZO RVR RD

YUBA RVR RD

B GI CREEK STRAWBERRY CREEK
SNOW

GRAEAGLE

TUOLUMNE PL

COUNTRY OA K S LOOP

MILL CREEK

M A D R VR RD

KINGS RVR LN

AMERICAN RIVER RD

SAN LORENZO RVR RD

GREYSTONE DR

BRENTSTONE ST

HARTFORD ST MONO CK

SH ERWIN CK PL WY

SALMON RIVER DR OWENS RIVER
LN
McGEE CK LN

YUBA RIVER
DR
WY
CK PL

HOLCOMB LIVEOAK CK CT

SANT IAGO CRK WAY

EEL RIVER PL

BRU S H CK PL SALT CK WY
McCLOUD RVR LN

RUSSIAN RVR DR

YUBA RIV DR

BOISE CK PL

WHITE ST A G RD AN TLER RD

EV E R GREEN DR

MOOSE DEER DR

ANTLER RD

ALDER DR

CANARY CT ACORN PL

CAPRI ST

DAY CREEK DR

HONEYBROOK WY

DEER CREE K L O OP

CLEAR LAKE RD

BUFFALO RD

BLACKPINE PL

CT SUGAR MAPLE

MONTE G O AVE

TURNER AVE

DOUBLEDAY AVE

GINGERWOOD RD

COUNTRY OAKS

OAK CR E EK DR

EAGLE CK PL

MOOSE CK LN

CARIBOU CK CT

GRIZZLEY CK CT CONDOR CK LN
BEAVER
CK LN

EL K CREEK DR

BIG CREEK RD

YUBA RIVER DR

MERCED RIVER RD
McCLOUD RIVER RD

TRUCKEE RVR

MILLIKEN AVE

STANFORD AVE

DUPONT AVE

EXCISE AVE

PO NI TE AVE

SPRUCE ST

CEDAR ST

STERLING ST

PO NI TE AVE

TURNER AVE
POMONA FWY (SR-60)

POINTE AVE

BUSIN ESS PARKWAY

CEDAR ST

FRANCIS ST

PROFORMA AVE

DE SOTO PL

PROFORMA AVE

SPRUCE CT

DEL R OI WYCEDAR ST

HELLMAN AVE

CARLOS AVE

COLORADO RVR RBD

UTTE CK PL
McCLOUD R VI ER RD

STONE CK

SILVERADO

CREEK PL

KLAMATH RIVER DR

FOX CK LN

ANTE L O PE CREEK DR
ST

LOCUST CT

MAPLE PRIVADO

CARLOS AVE

FRANCIS ST

AVION PL

TOWER DR

JURUPA ST

LINDSAY PRIVADO

JURUPA ST

TURNER AVE

DOUBLEDAY AVE

CARNEGIE AVE

LA SALLE ST

FRAN CIS ST M ETRO WAY

JURUPA ST JURUPA ST

ZINFANDEL CT

VANDERBILT ST

HUDSON AVE

FRANCIS ST FRANCIS ST

CHAMPAGNE AVE FRANCIS ST

CHABLIS AVE

CLARK ST

JURUPA ST

VINTAGE AVE

SANTA ANA ST

MALAGA PL

SARAH PL SARAH PL

JURUPA ST

AUTO C ENTER DR
McNAMARA ST

WINEVILLE AVE

AUTO CENTER DR

ROCHESTER AVE

WANAM AKER AVE

WALL ST

WOODR U FF WAY

ROCKEFELLER AVE

LOWELL ST

SANTA ANA ST

DUPONT AVE

DO UB LED AY AVE

SANTA ANA ST

ER WAYDEARBORN CT

GUASTI RD

AIRPORT DR

PEPPER TREE LN

SYCAMORE RDTURNER AVE

GUASTI RD

CENTRELAKE
DR

EBONY ST

SEQUOIA AVE

PONDEROSA AVE

AIRPORT DR

CLEVELAND AVE

GUASTI RD

BRICKELL ST

AIRPORT DR

BRICKELL ST

BRICKELL PRIVADO

WANAMAKER AVE

ONTARIO MILLS PARKWAY

GIBRALTAR ST

AIRPORT DR

ONTARIO MILLS PARKWAY

V NI TAGE AVE

FRANKLIN
AVE

ONTARIO
MILLS
DR

MILLS CIRCLE

ONTARIO MILLS PARKWAY

INLAND EMPIRE BLVD

FERRARI L N

POR SCHE WY

INLAND EMPIRE BLVD

LOTUS AVE

SHELBY ST

TRIUMPH LN CORVETTE D

JAGURAR WY

TURNER AVE

INLAND EMPIRE BLVD
ST

ISADORA WAY

HACIENDA DR

LAMANCHA WY

DEL RIO WY

LA DENEY ST

HELLMAN AVE

DEL R OI PL

CENTER AVE
MALL
DR

MILLS CIRCLE GURNEE
AVE

FR A N KLIN AVE

ONTARIO M IL LS DR ROCHESTER AVE

W NI EVILLE AVE

SIXTH ST

ARROYO DR
AVE

CARLO S
A

AMORE CT

HACIENDA DR
NE DR
R ST

ISADORA WAY
ST

RIVERSIDE DR

PHILADELPHIA ST

FOURTH ST

ARCHIBALD AVE ARCHIBALD AVE ARCHIBALD AVE

PHILADELPHIA ST

ARCHIBALD AVE

ARCAD AI N SHORES RD

OAK HILL DR

FAIRFIELD ST

TURNSTONE

ARCHIBALD AVE

RIVERSIDE DR

MISSION BLVD

HAVEN AVE

MISSION BLVD

DUPONT AVE

HAVEN AVE

FOURTH ST

HAVEN AVE

MILLIKEN AVE
ONTARIO FWY (I-15)

MILLIKEN AVE MILLIKEN AVE
ONTARIO FWY (I-15)

PHILADELPHIA ST

W NI EVILLE AVE

BURGUNDY PL

PHILADELPHIA ST

ETIWANDA AVE ETIWANDA AVE ETIWANDA AVE

FOURTH ST

BARR NI GTON AVE

EXCISE AVE

ONTARIO RANCH RD
T

MERCEDES LN

CHINO AVE CHINO AVE
ONTAR OI FWY (I-15)
SAN BERNARDINO FWY (I-10)

SHEA DR

PONDEROSA AV

SEQUO AI AV

FRANCIS ST

PACIFIC

PRIVADO

SLATER CIR

GOLDEN TRAILS

SILVER SADDLE ST

PALOMINO CT

CENTURION PL

PLAINFIELD PL

OLD ARCHIBALD RANCH RD STALLION WY

ROAN ST

RODEO PL
SHORES
RD

ARCADIAN

JOSHUA TREE RD

CENTURION PL

JOSHUA TREE ST
AUTUMN
RIDGE
RD

ROCKY LN

GREENBRIAR
DR
PONY
WY

CLOVER PL

STALLION ST

SWEETWATER
DR

ROCKYWY

CLOVER LN

DUNES ST

LAUREL VLY LN

SEA SI LAND TR

LOCUST CT

MILL CK

GUASTI RD

CARRILLO PRIVADO

JOHN BANGS DR

MOTOR LN

EAR L STONE DR

AR A B IAN PL

CLYDESDALE ST

ARCADIAN SHORES AV

BURNING TREE DR

THOROUGHBRED ST

BIG RANGE RD

NORTH SHORES DR

CHINO AV

TURNER AV

ARCHIBALD AVE

CARPENTER AVE

CLEVELAND AVE EUCALYPTUS AVE

HAVEN AVE HAVEN AVE

EDISON AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

HAVEN AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE ARCHIBALD AVE

MERRILL AVE

CARPENTER AVE

ONTARIO RANCH RD

ONTARIO AVE ONTARIO AVE

SMIDERLE LP

CHINO AV

VIA ASTI

V AI ALBA

VIA PIEMONTE

VIA TURIN

VIA VILLAGIO

ONTARIO CENTER PARKWAY

GOLDE N OA K RD
HOFER RANCH RD.

KETTERING DR

OLD GUASTI RD

GUASTI RD

COMMERCE PARKWAY

AIRPORT DR

TOYOTA WY

CONCOURS ST

CONCOURS ST
ION ST

TA H OE DR

AS H GAT E WAY

SEDONA CT

DUES E N BE RG DR

EDENGLEN AVE

AUBURN WY

DNI L CALLAWAY DR

ENWOOD DR

HERITAGE LN

GROVELAND DR

COTTAGE WY

EDENGLEN AVE

QU NI CY WY

EDENGLEN AVE

HAMPSHIRE DR BETHANY WY

EMORY LN

OAKWOOD DR

EDENGLEN AVE

TULANE WY

HAMPTON WY

BRADLEY LN

CLAREMONT DR

WESTMONT LNHAMILTON WY

CAMBRIDGE DR
ELM CT

HAMNER AVE HAMNER AVE

VIA TERRANO VIA CORVINA

VIA FIANO

VIAMOLINARA

VIA DOLCETTO

VIA BAROLO

ARBOR LN ARBOR LN

MERRIL AVE MERRIL AVE

KENSINGTON AVE ROSE PETAL WY

WICKFORD ST

OXFO RD L N

M CCLEVE W Y WEST

MC CLE VE WY EAST

CENTE NNIAL CI WEST C ENTE N NIA L CI EAST

VICTORY LN

HE RI TAG E PASE O
CROWN
CT

PRIMROSE PL

SALISBURY WY

DEVONSHIRE LN

DISCOVERY ST

CELEBRATION AVE

PARKPLACE AVE PARKVIEW ST

HOPKINS ST

GROWER AVE

GREEN AVE

HYCHE AVE

DULISSE AVE WING ST

KLASSEN ST

CELEBRAT OI N AVE

PARKPLACE AVE

TURNER AV

NEW HAVEN DR

ONTARIO RANCH RD

ONTARIO RANCH RD ONTARIO RANCH RD

SCHAEFER AVE

RUTHERFORD DR

LA AVENIDA DR ALEXANDER AVE

YOUNTVILLE DR

O A K V ILLE AVE

EDISON AVE

LA AVENIDA DR

SCHAEFER AVE

CHIP SMITH WY

ALBRIGHT LN

VICTORIA ST COTTAGE

GARDEN WY

PINE RIDGE LP

SOMERSTON WY

MONDAVI WY

MERRYVALE
WY

TRINITAS WY

MAYACAMA WY

SILVER OAK WY STERLING
ST

ARTESSA
WY

CLOVERDALE WY

INGLENOOK WY

CARNEROS AV
QVC WY

PLYMOUTH AVE NEWTON AVE

COLONIAL AVE

SALEM ST

NORWICH ST

DANBURY ST

COLCHESTER ST

BENNINGTON ST

LEWISTON ST

DARIEN ST

BELLEGRAVE AVE

BOUNTIFUL TR

GRAPEVINE TR

ROSEMARY WY

THOMPSON ST
MT. RAINIER DRIVE

GLACIER TRAIL BISCAYNE ST

ZION TRAIL

DENALI DRIVE

ACADIA AVE YELLOWSTONE DRIVE

YOSEMITE DRIVE

GRAND PARK ST

ACADIA AVE

ARCHES TRAIL

ROCKY MOUNTAIN ST

TURNER AVE

OLYMPIC DRIVE

DERBY LN

WILLIAMSBURG LN BARNVELDER

WYANDOTTE

ORPINGTON

TANGERINE WAY

APRICO T W A

AGRARIAN ST Y

PAIN TED C RESC ENT ST

PERENNIAL DR

STARRY N GI HT LN MASTERPIECE ST

OPHELIA LNPASTEL LN

SWALLOWTAIL LN

MONARCH PL

BUTTERFLY LN

LAVEND ER DR

LILAC LN OR CH ARD ST

SAGEW OOD LN

KINGS DR

CASTLE LN

GARD EN G AT E L N

MO N TE P RI VA D O

BELLA PRIVADO

SALIDA PRIVADO

ESTRELLA PRIVADO

PERDIDO PRIVADO

AFTON PRIVADO

CIELO PRIVADO

SON RISA PRIVADO

LUNA PRIVADO

AM HER ST PRIVADO

BORDEAUX DR

BOWERY PL

WILSHIRE RD

PENNY LN

BOURBON ST

ABBEY RD

GRAFTON ST

BROADWAY AV

BEALE WY OCEAN WY

CANAL WY

AMIGOS PRIVADO

TESORO PRIVADO

PERDIDO PRIVADO

PLAYA PR VI ADO

AMANECER PRIVADO

COLIBRI PRIVADO

CORAZON PRIVADO

MILL CR EEK AV

ALMENDAREZ

PRIVADO

MONETA PRIVADO

ARVADA PRIVADO

MONTROSE PRIVADO

SCOTT WY

ROGERS WY

WAYNE AV

KEN T W Y

DIAN A WY

BAN NER ST

MUR DOC K LN

PARKER LN

HOWLETT LN

DRYDEN AV

KINGSTON AV

MANITOBA PL

OTTAWA AV

CORNWALL ST

EDMONTON ST

ALBERTA ST

SARNIA ST

CALGARY ST

WINNIPEG AV

WELLAND AV

SILVER SKY DR

COPPERH ILL ST

FLAGSTON E
AV

REFLEC TION LN

SU SSEX PR IVADO

JASMINE
LN

BAN TAMPASEO

BR AHM APASEO

BR ESSEPASEO

JAVAPASEO

CLEMENTINE
DR

AVOCADO
TR

STAR K LN
EC HO
C T

KENDALL LN TRELLIS WY

BODEGA WY

CELLARS
WY

MIDSUMMER

PRIVADO WILD HORSE PRIVADO

CARDINALE

PRIVADO

PARADUXX

PRIVADO

QUINTESSA

PRIVADO

HAVEN AVE

HELLMAN AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

OLIVIA WY

BLAIRE WY

CHARLOTTE AV

LOLA AV

STELLA AV

ELLIE AV

CORA WY

SCARLETT LN SCARLETT LN

MABEL LN MABEL LN

CLARA LN CLARA LN

HARPER ST HARPER ST

PENELOPE LN PENELOPE LN

PARKVIEW ST

REESE WY

ANSLEY AV

AVERY AV

TATUM LN

HARLOW LN
MAE WY

EMBRY LN

IVY AV IVY AV

PIPER WY

HAZELST

VIOLET LN

SUNR SI E AV

DAYLIGHT AV

MOONLIGHT ST

ROSY PKWY
SUNSET
DR

CHEERFUL PASEO

MILL CREEK AV

TREE BLOSSOM ST

ASPEN ST

HEARTWOOD ST

SUMAC ST

CALERA ST

ATTALA ST

FINCASTLE ST

CALISTOGA AV

MENDOCINO AV

AMHERST AV

ANNISTON AV

NELSON DR

POLLOCK ST

EAMES ST

WRIGHT AVE

TWINKLE AVE

GARRICK ST

PRINCE WY

GRAYSON WY

WILSON AVJORDAN AV

ANDERSON AV KANE DR
AUSTIN

CURRY ST
STEED

JACOBSON

LAUTNER

ALLSTON PASEO

PHEASANT
CRANE
KIWI
M

WREN EADOWLARK

TANAGER

ALMOND BLOSSOM ST

CRISANTA PRIVADO PEONY PASEO

SAGE PASEO CLIFTON AV

HO LLYHOCK PASEO

HISBISCUSPASEO

CRISANTA PRIVADO

HEATHER PRIVADO

MILL CREEK AV

BR IGH T PASEO

DELIGH T PASEO

HAPPY PASEO

SU NN Y PASEO

LAN TER N PASEO

OASIS PASEO

SPARKLEPASEO

JOLLYPASEO

RADIANT D R

AMHERST AV

VENTURA AV

SUNSET ST

LA JOLLA ST

CATALINA ST

CAMBRIA

PRIVADO

ENC NI TI AS AVE
AVILA

PRIVADO

HALTON PRIVADO

BASANITE AV

SHALE AV

DOLOMITE ST

BROCKRAM DR

KINGLET AV

CHATHAM ST

CLIFTON ST

CANTONA PASEO

FERGUSON PRIVADO

KANE DR

SU NSTONE ST
3 7
3 2 2
8j
7 7

E CHINO

E RIVERSIDE

S ARCH BI ALD

S HAVEN

E AIRPORT

N HAVEN

S MILLIKEN S HAMNER

S ET WI ANDA

E PHILADELPHIA

E INLAND EMPIRE

E JURUPA

S VINTAGE

N M LI L KI EN

N ETIWANDA

S WINEVILLE

N ARCH BI ALD

E SANTA ANA

S SUMNER

E JURUPA

E EUCALYPTUS

E INLAND EMPIRE

E EDISON E EDISON

E EDISON
± Approved by City Council on January 27, 2010
0 1 2
Miles
EXHIBIT LU-01

LAND USE PLAN
Note: The City of Ontario in its entirety is
located within the Airport Influence Area
of Ontario International Airport.

An area in which current or future
airport-related noise, overflight, safety,
or airspace protection factors may
significantly affect land uses or necessitate
restriction on those uses.

Refer to the Ontario Airport Land
Use Compatibility Plan for further
information.

1. Downtown

2. Airport Metro/Entertainment

3. Guasti

4. South Euclid

5. South Employment
Corridors

6. East Holt Blvd

CHARDONNAY CT

GREENWOOD AVE
(private drainage road)

OLIVE ST
PLACER
CT

CAROLINE

SAN D EI GO
AV

HARVARD PL
CT

DRIFTWOOD PL

NORTHSHORES PL

ROCHESTER AVE

SEAGULL AVE

FAIRFIELD ST

CRYSTAL SPGS PL

ROCK SPGS PL

OAK SPRINGS PL

FOX GLEN LP

ACORNGLENN PL

GLENN PLBADGER

FO X GLEN LP LYTLE CREEK LP

BEAR CK

LYT LE C R EEK LOOP

H ONEYGLENN WY

ALISO CREEK
CREEK

OA K HILL DR PONY DR

PINTO PL

CRYSTAL
LK CT

PA R K GLENN WY
CT

COLD CK WY

OAK HILL ST

TAM O' SHANTER CT

BON VIEW AVE

GOLDCREST AVE

GARF EI LD AVE

HOPE AVE

TAYLOR PL

CALDWELL
P
P
L
HOENIX

PL BANYAN ST

CALDWELL PL
GOLD

CREST PBLANYAN ST

GARFIELD
PL

RAYMOND PL

CHERRY HILL ST

HAZELTINE
CT

HAZELTINE
CT
GREEN

WOOD PL

CALAVER A S PL

TAM O SHANTER

PARKSIDE DR

V RI GIN AI WY

MARIGOLD WAY

ST ANDREWS ST

DEERFIELD ST

VIRGINIA PL

MERION S T MARIGOLD WY DORAL CT

MERION CT
AMADOR

CALDWELL AVE

PHOEN XI AVE

MERION ST

DORAL CT

MILDRED PL

PARCO AVE

COTTONWOOD ST COTTONWOO D ST

MERION CT

DORAL CT

SANDPIPER AV DEEERFIELD ST

MILDRED PL

DEL NORTE AVEMAIDSTONE ST

ST ANDREWS ST

IMPERIAL

LASSEN AVE

BERMUDA
DUNES
ST

WALKER AVE

BERMUDA DUNES ST

HARBOUR AVE

CASTLE MAIDSTONEST

COTTONWOOD ST

CA RNOUSTIE CT

PHOENIX PL

CALDWELL
PL

WISTERIA ST

TAYLOR PL SPRUCE ST

HOPE PL

BOXWOOD CT

WISTERIA CT

SANDERLING ST

HOPE PL HOPE PL

TAYLOR PL

SANDERLING ST
CEL LO

CEDAR ST

MONTI CEL LO

GREENWOOD

SKYLARK ST SKYLARK ST

PHOENIX AVE

CALDWELL AVE

GOLDCREST AVE

MONTICELLO ST

BON VIEW

SHEA RWATE R
ST

PHOENIX PL

TAYLOR PL

HOPE PL

GOLDCREST PL

GREENWOOD PL

GARF EI LD PLHOLMES PL

MARIGOLD PL

HOLMES PL

MILDRED PL BANYAN

DEL NORT E AVE

OAK HILL OAK HILL

SANDPIPER PL
MI PE

R AI L PL

BANYAN ST

LAKE AVE

BERMUDA DUNES ST

TAM O SHANTER

LASSEN AVE

SPYGLASS CT
DORAL
CT

COSTACT

INVERNESS
CT

MERION DR

CASTLE HARBOUR PL

MEADOW B ROOK PL

CASCADES CASCADES TR PINEHURST CT

AUGUSTA AVE

DORAL ST

MERION ST

RIVERSIDE DR

TAM O'SHANTER ST
T

FAIRFIELD ST

OAK HILL CT

BANYAN ST

CHERRY HILL ST

OAK HILL CT

P NI EHURST PL

BANYAN CT

TAM O SHANTER

HAZELTINE ST

AUGUSTA AVE

BROOKSIDE ST

ST ANDREWS PL
BANYAN

QUAKER RIDGE PL

OAK HILL CT

CHERRY HILL ST

PRAR EI DUNES PL

BANYAN ST

HILL ST

BOCA RATON CT

TIARA AVE

BALBOA AVE

VALENCIA AVE
CHERRY

SAN DIEGO PL

SACRAMENTO
PL
PEBBLE
BEACH
CT
BALBOA

WHISPERING
LAKES

NI VERNESS

BROOKSIDE DR

ST ANDREWS DR

BAKER AVE

DIVERSA DR

TAM A RASK DR W H ISPERING LAKES LN

SANDPIPER AVE HAZELTINE ST

DEL NORTE PL

ST ANDREWS CT MILDRED PL

AMADOR PL

OAKH I LL DR

CALAV ERAS
PL

DEL N ORTE PL

FIRECREST CT

WOODLARK DR

ARCADIAN SHORES RD

WALNUT ST

HAZELTINE ST

PEACHTREE PL
DR

PEACHTREE
PL

BROOKSIDE CT

COTTONWOOD TR

COTTONWOOD CT

ST ANDREWS DR

PEACHTREE

PL DUNES ST

MERION ST

PLA NI F EI LD
DR

PEACHTREEP
N
L
ORTH

SHORES DR

SHORES NORTH
SHORES
RD

ARCADIAN

TURNER AVE

PLAINFIELD DR

COLON AI L AVE

COG HILL CT COG HILL CT

DUNES ST

CYPRESS POINT PL CYPRESS POINT PL

PINE VALLEY AVE

ARCADIAN SHORES RD

SURREY WY

GREENBRIAR DR

BRONCO DR

NORTH SHORE D

LONGHORN ST R

PEACHTREE PL

NORTH SHORE DR

PLAINFIELDDR

BLACK HORSE DR

TURNER AVE

PONY DR STA LLION WY

COLT WY

WRA N GLER PL

BLACK HORSE DR

CHAPARRAL ST

ROCKY PL

CLOVER WY

PEACHTREE
LN

OL D A RC HIBALD RANCH RD

G R EY F OX LN

BERMUDA DUNES ST BERMUDA DUNES ST BERMUDA DUNES ST

VINEYARD AVE BERMUDA DUNES CT

HARBOUR TOWN TR

CANTERBURY

COLONIAL AVE CANTERBURY

RICHMOND ST

BROOKSIDE ST

O AK HILL DR

P NI E VALLEY

WALNUT ST

W I L MINGTON DR

COLON AI L AVE

SEA SI LAND PL

DOVER PL

LEXINGTON PL
TAM O'

SHANTER

HAZELTINE ST

COGHILL ST

DUNES ST

PINE VALLEY AVE

CEDAR R DI GE DUNES ST

DESERT FOREST AVE

CEDAR RIDGE
ST. ANDREWS ST

OAKMONT ST

T URNSTONE AVE

TAM O SHANTER

WALNUT ST

DUNLIN WY

BI G RANGE RD

WRANGLER PL WRANGLER PL

PALOMINO PL

MUSTANG DR

BLACK HORSE DR

CENTUR OI N WY

LAGO ST
WOOD

OAKLEAF
CT
RD

POPLAR DR

WOOD CT

MORNING
ST. TROPEZ DR

BISON WY

FAWN CT

BLUE FOX DR
WY

ANTELOPE

RE NI DEER LN
PL
DE
CRYS

ER CREEK LOOP TAL LK RD
WY

PINECONE

REDPINE PL

RIPPLING BROO K PL CARIB OU PL

CLEAR LA KE RD

ELSINORE WY

ANTLER RD
GINGER

GLENN RD
CEDAR
SHADOW
WARM

SODA SPRINGS
CT
CK WY

SPGS CT

ASH G ATE WY

MI L ANO ST
GENOA

ASHGATE PL

ASHGATE CT

S U MMER ISLAND

APPLEWOOD DR
NECTAR

CREEKSIDE DR

ALDER CREEK DR

OAK C REEK DR

O A K C R EEK

OAK CREEK

STRAWBERRY CREEK PL

ADLER CK

TUOLUMNE

CT CEDARGLEN

LAURELTREE DR GINGERWOOD RD

OAKLEAF RD
MORNINGWOOD CT

SCOUT CT

PEACHTREE PL

BURNING TREE DR MUSTANG PL

PALOMINO PL

PINTO PL

TUMBLEWEED ST

CHAPARR AL ST

COLD SPRINGS PL
WAY

RUSH CREEK SAN LORENZO RVR RD

YUBA RVR RD

B GI CREEK STRAWBERRY CREEK
SNOW

GRAEAGLE

TUOLUMNE PL

COUNTRY OA K S LOOP

MILL CREEK

M A D R VR RD

KINGS RVR LN

AMERICAN RIVER RD

SAN LORENZO RVR RD

GREYSTONE DR

BRENTSTONE ST

HARTFORD ST MONO CK

SH ERWIN CK PL WY

SALMON RIVER DR OWENS RIVER
LN
McGEE CK LN

YUBA RIVER
DR
WY
CK PL

HOLCOMB LIVEOAK CK CT

SANT IAGO CRK WAY

EEL RIVER PL

BRU S H CK PL SALT CK WY
McCLOUD RVR LN

RUSSIAN RVR DR

YUBA RIV DR

BOISE CK PL

WHITE ST A G RD AN TLER RD

EV E R GREEN DR

MOOSE DEER DR

ANTLER RD

ALDER DR

CANARY CT ACORN PL

CAPRI ST

DAY CREEK DR

HONEYBROOK WY

DEER CREE K L O OP

CLEAR LAKE RD

BUFFALO RD

BLACKPINE PL

CT SUGAR MAPLE

MONTE G O AVE

TURNER AVE

DOUBLEDAY AVE

GINGERWOOD RD

COUNTRY OAKS

OAK CR E EK DR

EAGLE CK PL

MOOSE CK LN

CARIBOU CK CT

GRIZZLEY CK CT CONDOR CK LN
BEAVER
CK LN

EL K CREEK DR

BIG CREEK RD

YUBA RIVER DR

MERCED RIVER RD
McCLOUD RIVER RD

TRUCKEE RVR

MILLIKEN AVE

STANFORD AVE

DUPONT AVE

EXCISE AVE

PO NI TE AVE

SPRUCE ST

CEDAR ST

STERLING ST

PO NI TE AVE

TURNER AVE
POMONA FWY (SR-60)

POINTE AVE

BUSIN ESS PARKWAY

CEDAR ST

FRANCIS ST

PROFORMA AVE

DE SOTO PL

PROFORMA AVE

SPRUCE CT

DEL R OI WYCEDAR ST

HELLMAN AVE

CARLOS AVE

LYNX PL

CEDAR ST

QUAKER R DI GE P

GREVILLEALCT

VINEYARD AVE

MONTICELLO CT

BAKER AVE

CASTLE HARBOUR PL SHEARWATER ST

FREMONT CT

CEDAR ST

AUGUSTA CT

WALKER AVE

PINEHURST AVE

SPRUCE ST

CEDAR ST

PARCO AVE
W

SKYLARK ST

ALKER AVE

AUGUSTA PL

FRANCIS ST

MONTICELLO ST

FRANCIS ST

CUCAMONGA AVE

TAYLOR PL

LOCUST ST

COLORADO RVR RBD

UTTE CK PL
McCLOUD R VI ER RD

STONE CK

SILVERADO

CREEK PL

KLAMATH RIVER DR

FOX CK LN

ANTE L O PE CREEK DR

MARIGOLD PL

LOCUST ST

ACACIA CT

WOODLAWN ST

PARKSIDE PL

ACACIA ST

MILDRED AVE

LOCUST ST

BAKER AVE
ELM ST

ACACIA ST

SACRAMENTO AVE

VINEYARD AVE

VALENCIA ST

BALBOA AVE
ELM ST

LOCUST CT

MAPLE PRIVADO

CARLOS AVE

BALBOA AVE

FRANCIS ST

AVION PL

TOWER DR

JURUPA ST

LINDSAY PRIVADO

JURUPA ST

TURNER AVE

DOUBLEDAY AVE

CARNEGIE AVE

LA SALLE ST

VINEYARD AV

AIRPORT DR

WALKER ST

AIRPORT DR

KERN ST

PEACH AVE

ONTARIO BLVD

GROVE PL

MAIN ST

CUCAMONGA AVE

MAITLAND ST

CALIFORNIA ST

CUCAMONGA AVE

JEFFERSON ST

WASHINGTON ST GARF EI LD AVE

STATE ST

BON VIEW AVE

HOPE AVE

BELMONT ST

TAYLOR AVE

ONTARIO BLVD

CALDWELL AVE

CAMPUS AVE

FRAN CIS ST M ETRO W AY

JURUPA ST JURUPA ST

ZINFANDEL CT

VANDERBILT ST

HUDSON AVE

FRANCIS ST FRANCIS ST

CHAMPAGNE AVE FRANCIS ST

CHABLIS AVE

CLARK ST

JURUPA ST

VINTAGE AVE

SANTA ANA ST

MALAGA PL

SARAH PL SARAH PL

JURUPA ST

AUTO C ENTER DR
McNAMARA ST

WINEVILLE AVE

AUTO CENTER DR

ROCHESTER AVE

WANAM AKER AVE

WALL ST

WOODR U FF WAY

ROCKEFELLER AVE

LOWELL ST

SANTA ANA ST

DUPONT AVE

DO UB LED AY AVE

SANTA ANA ST

BON VIEW AVE

WOODLAWN ST

ACACIA ST

CUCAMONGA AVE

EMPORIA ST

WILLOW ST

NOCTA ST

ELMA ST

MUSCATEL AVE

MAIN ST

EMPORIA ST

IMPERIAL AVE

ELMA CT

LASSEN PL

ELMA CT

CORONA AVE

SACRAMENTO AVE

VINEYARD AVE

CONVENTION CENTER WAY

DEARBORN CT

V NI EYARD / TERM NI AL WAY

GUASTI RD

AIRPORT DR

PEPPER TREE LN

SYCAMORE RDTURNER AVE

GUASTI RD

CENTRELAKE
DR

EBONY ST

SEQUOIA AVE

PONDEROSA AVE

AIRPORT DR

CLEVELAND AVE

GUASTI RD

BRICKELL ST

AIRPORT DR

BRICKELL ST

BRICKELL PRIVADO

WANAMAKER AVE

ONTARIO MILLS PARKWAY

GIBRALTAR ST

AIRPORT DR

ONTARIO MILLS PARKWAY

V NI TAGE AVE

FRANKLIN
AVE

ONTARIO
MILLS
DR

MILLS CIRCLE

MARIN AVE

MADERA AVE

MADERA AV
H ST E

BAKER AVE

GRANADA CT

PLAZA SERENA

ORANGE AVE

PLACER AVE

SACAMENTO AVE

SAN D EI GO AVE

ROSEWOOD CT
N
JAY ST

APA AVE

MERCED AVE

ROSEWOOD CT

MARIPOSA AVE

GRANADA CT

LASSEN AVE

HUMBOLDT PL

GLENN PL
D ST

FLORA ST

HUMBOLDT
CT

F ST EL DORADO
CT
GLENN
CT

EL MORADO CT

LAKE AVE

IMPERIAL AVE

HUMBOLDT CT

GLENN AVE

EL DORADO AVE

DEL NORTE AVE

CALAVERAS AVE CALAVERAS AVE
I ST
LASSEN
AVE

LAKE AVE

FRESNO ST

HUMBOLT

GLENN AVE

EL DORADO AVE

ROSEWOOD
CT

FLORA ST

AMADOR AVE

ALAMEDA AVE

PARKSIDE AVE

V RI G NI AI AVE
G ST

VIRGINIA AVE FLORA ST

PARKSIDE AVE
E ST

CUCAMONGA AVE

HOLMES AVE

CUCAMONGA AVE

LA PALOMA AVE

HOLMES AVE

LA PALOMA AVE
J S T
I ST
H ST

EL MORADO CT

GREENWOOD AVE

FLORENCE C

GRANATDA CT
F ST

FLORA ST

FLORENCE AVE

ALLYN AVE
F ST
E ST
D ST

BERLYN AVE

ALLYN AVE

ORCHARD LN
J ST

PLAZA SERENA
J ST

ONTARIO MILLS PARKWAY

INLAND EMPIRE BLVD

FERRARI L N

POR SCHE WY

INLAND EMPIRE BLVD

LOTUS AVE

SHELBY ST

TRIUMPH LN CORVETTE D

JAGURAR WY

TURNER AVE

INLAND EMPIRE BLVD
G ST

MAR PI OSA AVE

LAKE AVE

HAWTHORNE ST

EL DORADO AVE

HAWTHORNE ST

BONNIE BRAE CT

YALE ST

PRINCETON ST

MANDALAY ST

PRINCETON ST

YALE ST

FIFTH ST ORANGE AVE
PLACER
AV

HAWTHORNE ST

VINEYARD AVE

FIFTH ST

BRAE CT

M ULBERRY CT

BALBOA WAY
BONNIE

HAWTHORNE CT

CARLOS PL

ISADORA WAY

HACIENDA DR

LAMANCHA WY

DEL RIO WY

LA DENEY ST

HELLMAN AVE

DEL R OI PL

YALE ST

CENTER AVE
MALL
DR

MILLS CIRCLE GURNEE
AVE

FR A N KLIN AVE

ONTARIO M IL LS DR ROCHESTER AVE

W NI EVILLE AVE

CORONA AVE

LA DENEY CT

SIXTH ST

ARROYO DR

ALONDRA AVE

CARLO S

SOLANO PL

ALONDRA CT

DEODAR ST

SAN DIEGO
PL

S ACRAMENTO
PL

ORANGE PL
ST
ST

HARVARD PL

BERLYN AVE

PRINCETON ST

COUNCIL AVE

YALE ST

ROSEWOOD CT

ORCHARD LN

ALLYN AVE

ORCHARD LANECOUNCIL AVE

HOLMES CT

LA PALOMA
CT

HARVARD PL

V RI G NI AI AVE

PARKSIDE AVE

BONNIE BRAE CT

FIFTH ST

CAROLINE ST

VIRGINIA AVE

CAROLINE CT

V RI G NI AI AVE

HOLMES CT

SIXTH ST

DEODAR ST

HAWTHORNE ST
HOPE

LA DENEY
CT

MARCELLA CT
ST
ORANGE

PLACER AVE

SACRAMENTO AVE

SAN D EI GO AVE

T R NI ITY LOOP ALVARADO

LA PAZ AVE

SEVENTH ST

HIGHLAND CT

OLIVE ST

SYCAMORE ST

BARRANCA AVE

CAROLINE CT

HACIENDA

SYCAMORE CT

HACIENDA DR

CAR O LINE DR DEODAR ST

SOLANO AVE

RICHLAND ST

ALVARADO CT

SYCAMORE CT

SEVENTH ST VIRGINIA AVE

HIGHLAND CT

OLIVE CT

RAYMOND ST

RAYMOND CT

PARKSIDE

EIGHTH ST

AMADOR AVE

CALAVERAS AVE

RAYMOND ST

HIGHLAND CT

DEL NORTE AVE

EL DORADO AVE OLIVE
CT

EL DORADO AVE

GLENN AVE

HUMBOLT AVE

EL DORADO
AV

SYCAMORE ST

SYCAMORE

HUMBOLDT AVE
LAKE
AV
MADERA
AV

CORONA AVE

SEVENTH ST
MADERA

MAR NI AVE

ORANGE CT

PLACER PL

ISADORA WAY

CARLOS AV

LA DENEY DR

LASSEN AVE

DEL NORTE CT

CALAVERAS CT

LA DENEY DR

AMADOR AVE

ALVARADO ST

PHILADELPHIA ST

HOLT BLVD
SAN BERNARDINO FWY (I-10)

GROVE AVE

BAKER AV

FOURTH ST FOURTH ST
ST

HOLT BLVD

GROVE AVE

MISSION BLVD

GROVE AVE GROVE AVE

RIVERSIDE DR

PHILADELPHIA ST

FOURTH ST

ARCHIBALD AVE ARCHIBALD AVE ARCHIBALD AVE

PHILADELPHIA ST

ARCHIBALD AVE

ARCAD AI N SHORES RD

OAK HILL DR

FAIRFIELD ST

TURNSTONE

ARCHIBALD AVE

RIVERSIDE DR

MISSION BLVD

HAVEN AVE

MISSION BLVD

DUPONT AVE

HAVEN AVE

FOURTH ST

HAVEN AVE

MILLIKEN AVE
ONTARIO FWY (I-15)

MILLIKEN AVE MILLIKEN AVE
ONTARIO FWY (I-15)

PHILADELPHIA ST

W NI EVILLE AVE

BURGUNDY PL

PHILADELPHIA ST

ETIWANDA AVE ETIWANDA AVE ETIWANDA AVE

FOURTH ST

BARR NI GTON AVE

EXCISE AVE

CHINO AVE CHINO AVE CHINO AVE CHINO AVE

ONTARIO RANCH RD

EUCALYPTUS AVE

MERRILL AVE

BON VIEW AVE

CUCAMONGA AVE

DEODAR ST
CT

LA DENEY
DR

DEODAR ST
HOPE

HIGHLAND CT

LEEDS AVE

BAKER AVE

LASSEN AVE

LAKE AVE LAKE

HUMBOLT
AV
MADERA
AV
MARIN
AV

CORONA AVE

SOLANO AVE OLIVE CT

MERCEDES LN

MISSION BLVD

CHINO AVE CHINO AVE

CHINO AVE

BAKER AVE

CHINO AVE

GROVE AVE GROVE AVE GROVE AVE GROVE AVE

BON VIEW AVE

EDISON AVE

BON VIEW AVE BON VIEW AVE BON VIEW AVE

CAMPUS AVE
ONTAR OI FWY (I-15)
SAN BERNARDINO FWY (I-10)

SHEA DR

PONDEROSA AV

SEQUO AI AV

FRANCIS ST

PACIFIC

PRIVADO

SLATER CIR

GOLDEN TRAILS

SILVER SADDLE ST

PALOMINO CT

CENTURION PL

PLAINFIELD PL

OLD ARCHIBALD RANCH RD STALLION WY

ROAN ST

RODEO PL
SHORES
RD

ARCADIAN

JOSHUA TREE RD

CENTURION PL

JOSHUA TREE ST
AUTUMN
RIDGE
RD

ROCKY LN

GREENBRIAR
DR
PONY
WY

CLOVER PL

STALLION ST

SWEETWATER
DR

ROCKYWY

CLOVER LN

DUNES ST

LAUREL VLY LN

SEA SI LAND TR

EIGHTH ST

LOCUST CT

MILL CK

GUASTI RD

CARRILLO PRIVADO

MOORE WY

JOHN BANGS DR

MOTOR LN

EAR L STONE DR

COTTONWOOD ST

GOLDCREST PL DORAL CT

DEERFIELD ST

HOLMES AV HOLMES PL

GARFIELD AVE

DUNES ST

HOPE AVE

DEERFIELD ST

CUCAMONGA AVE

GREENWOOD ST

TAYLOR AVE

AR A B IAN PL

CLYDESDALE ST

ARCADIAN SHORES AV

BURNING TREE DR

THOROUGHBRED ST

BIG RANGE RD

NORTH SHORES DR

CHINO AV

TURNER AV

GROVE AVE

WALKER AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE

CARPENTER AVE

CLEVELAND AVE EUCALYPTUS AVE

HAVEN AVE HAVEN AVE

EDISON AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

HAVEN AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE ARCHIBALD AVE

MERRILL AVE

CARPENTER AVE

ONTARIO RANCH RD

EUCALYPTUS AVE

MERRILL AVE

EDISON AVE

WALKER AVE WALKER AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

EDISON AVE

VINEYARD AVE

WALKER AVE

ONTARIO AVE ONTARIO AVE

SMIDERLE LP

CHINO AV

CEDAR ST

GREEN PRIVADO

PRIVADO
CHIEF

VIA ASTI

V AI ALBA

VIA PIEMONTE

VIA TURIN

VIA VILLAGIO

ONTARIO CENTER PARKWAY

GOLDE N OA K RD
HOFER RANCH RD.

KETTERING DR

OLD GUASTI RD

GREVILLEA CT

GUASTI RD

COMMERCE PARKWAY

AIRPORT DR

TOYOTA WY

CONCOURS ST

AVION ST

BAKER PRIVADO

MARIPOSA PRIVADO

ELMA PRIVADO
D ST

NOCTA PRIVADO

MARIN PRIVADO

NOCTA ST

MADERA PR VI ADO

COTTONWOOD CT

PARKSIDE AV

VIRGINIA PL

COTTONWOOD CT

TA H OE DR

AS H GAT E WAY

LAKE PL

DEODAR ST

MARIPOSA AV
MARIN
AV
MADERA
AV

HIGHLAND CT

OLIVE ST

RAYMOND ST

MARINAV

MARIPOSA AV

FLORA ST

SEDONA CT

DUES E N BE RG DR

ORANGE PR VI ADO

PLACER PR VI ADO

SOLANO PRIVADO

HARVARD PRIVADO

PLACER PRIVADO PLACER PR VI ADO

EDENGLEN AVE

AUBURN WY

DNI L CALLAWAY DR

ENWOOD DR

HERITAGE LN

GROVELAND DR

COTTAGE WY

EDENGLEN AVE

QU NI CY WY

EDENGLEN AVE

HAMPSHIRE DR BETHANY WY

EMORY LN

OAKWOOD DR

EDENGLEN AVE

TULANE WY

HAMPTON WY

BRADLEY LN

CLAREMONT DR

WESTMONT LNHAMILTON WY

CAMBRIDGE DR

RAYMOND
PL
ELM CT

WALNUT ST WALNUT ST

ELEVENTH AVE

SCHAEFER AVE SCHAEFER AVE

HAMNER AVE HAMNER AVE

VIA TERRANO VIA CORVINA

VIA FIANO

VIAMOLINARA

VIA DOLCETTO

VIA BAROLO

ARBOR LN ARBOR LN

MERRIL AVE MERRIL AVE

KENSINGTON AVE ROSE PETAL WY

WICKFORD ST

OXFO RD L N

M CCLEVE W Y WEST

MC CLE VE WY EAST

CENTE NNIAL CI WEST C ENTE N NIA L CI EAST

VICTORY LN

HE RI TAG E PASE O
CROWN
CT

PRIMROSE PL

SALISBURY WY

DEVONSHIRE LN

DISCOVERY ST

CELEBRATION AVE

PARKPLACE AVE PARKVIEW ST

HOPKINS ST

GROWER AVE

GREEN AVE

HYCHE AVE

DULISSE AVE WING ST

KLASSEN ST

CELEBRAT OI N AVE

PARKPLACE AVE

TURNER AV

NEW HAVEN DR

ONTARIO RANCH RD

ONTARIO RANCH RD ONTARIO RANCH RD

SCHAEFER AVE

RUTHERFORD DR

LA AVENIDA DR ALEXANDER AVE

YOUNTVILLE DR

O A K V ILLE AVE

EDISON AVE

LA AVENIDA DR

SCHAEFER AVE

CHIP SMITH WY

ALBRIGHT LN

VICTORIA ST COTTAGE

GARDEN WY

PINE RIDGE LP

SOMERSTON WY

MONDAVI WY

MERRYVALE
WY

TRINITAS WY

MAYACAMA WY

SILVER OAK WY STERLING
ST

ARTESSA
WY

CLOVERDALE WY

INGLENOOK WY

CARNEROS AV
JAY ST
QVC WY

PLYMOUTH AVE NEWTON AVE

COLONIAL AVE

SALEM ST

NORWICH ST

DANBURY ST

COLCHESTER ST

BENNINGTON ST

LEWISTON ST

DARIEN ST

BELLEGRAVE AVE

BOUNTIFUL TR

GRAPEVINE TR

ROSEMARY WY

THOMPSON ST
MT. RAINIER DRIVE

GLACIER TRAIL BISCAYNE ST

ZION TRAIL

DENALI DRIVE

ACADIA AVE YELLOWSTONE DRIVE

YOSEMITE DRIVE

GRAND PARK ST

ACADIA AVE

ARCHES TRAIL

ROCKY MOUNTAIN ST

TURNER AVE

OLYMPIC DRIVE

DERBY LN

WILLIAMSBURG LN BARNVELDER

WYANDOTTE

ORPINGTON

TANGERINE WAY

APRICO T W A

AGRARIAN ST Y

PAIN TED C RESC ENT ST

PERENNIAL DR

STARRY N GI HT LN MASTERPIECE ST

OPHELIA LNPASTEL LN

SWALLOWTAIL LN

MONARCH PL

BUTTERFLY LN

LAVEND ER DR

LILAC LN OR CH ARD ST

SAGEW OOD LN

KINGS DR

CASTLE LN

GARD EN G AT E L N

MO N TE P RI VA D O

BELLA PRIVADO

SALIDA PRIVADO

ESTRELLA PRIVADO

PERDIDO PRIVADO

AFTON PRIVADO

CIELO PRIVADO

SON RISA PRIVADO

LUNA PRIVADO

AM HER ST PRIVADO

BORDEAUX DR

BOWERY PL

WILSHIRE RD

PENNY LN

BOURBON ST

ABBEY RD

GRAFTON ST

BROADWAY AV

BEALE WY OCEAN WY

CANAL WY

AMIGOS PRIVADO

TESORO PRIVADO

PERDIDO PRIVADO

PLAYA PR VI ADO

AMANECER PRIVADO

COLIBRI PRIVADO

CORAZON PRIVADO

MILL CR EEK AV

ALMENDAREZ

PRIVADO

MONETA PRIVADO

ARVADA PRIVADO

MONTROSE PRIVADO

SCOTT WY

ROGERS WY

WAYNE AV

KEN T W Y

DIAN A WY

BAN NER ST

MUR DOC K LN

PARKER LN

HOWLETT LN

DRYDEN AV

KINGSTON AV

MANITOBA PL

OTTAWA AV

CORNWALL ST

EDMONTON ST

ALBERTA ST

SARNIA ST

CALGARY ST

WINNIPEG AV

WELLAND AV

SILVER SKY DR

COPPERH ILL ST

FLAGSTON E
AV

REFLEC TION LN

SU SSEX PR IVADO

JASMINE
LN

BAN TAMPASEO

BR AHM APASEO

BR ESSEPASEO

JAVAPASEO

CLEMENTINE
DR

AVOCADO
TR

STAR K LN
EC HO
C T

KENDALL LN TRELLIS WY

BODEGA WY

CELLARS
WY

MIDSUMMER

PRIVADO WILD HORSE PRIVADO

CARDINALE

PRIVADO

PARADUXX

PRIVADO

QUINTESSA

PRIVADO

HAVEN AVE

HELLMAN AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

OLIVIA WY

BLAIRE WY

CHARLOTTE AV

LOLA AV

STELLA AV

ELLIE AV

CORA WY

SCARLETT LN SCARLETT LN

MABEL LN MABEL LN

CLARA LN CLARA LN

HARPER ST HARPER ST

PENELOPE LN PENELOPE LN

PARKVIEW ST

REESE WY

ANSLEY AV

AVERY AV

TATUM LN

HARLOW LN
MAE WY

EMBRY LN

IVY AV IVY AV

PIPER WY

HAZELST

VIOLET LN

SUNR SI E AV

DAYLIGHT AV

MOONLIGHT ST

ROSY PKWY
SUNSET
DR

CHEERFUL PASEO

MILL CREEK AV

TREE BLOSSOM ST

ASPEN ST

HEARTWOOD ST

SUMAC ST

CALERA ST

ATTALA ST

FINCASTLE ST

CALISTOGA AV

MENDOCINO AV

AMHERST AV

ANNISTON AV

NELSON DR

POLLOCK ST

EAMES ST

WRIGHT AVE

TWINKLE AVE

GARRICK ST

PRINCE WY

GRAYSON WY

WILSON AVJORDAN AV

ANDERSON AV KANE DR
AUSTIN

CURRY ST
STEED

JACOBSON

LAUTNER

ALLSTON PASEO

PHEASANT
CRANE
KIWI
M

WREN EADOWLARK

TANAGER

ALMOND BLOSSOM ST

CRISANTA PRIVADO PEONY PASEO

SAGE PASEO CLIFTON AV

HO LLYHOCK PASEO

HISBISCUSPASEO

CRISANTA PRIVADO

HEATHER PRIVADO

MILL CREEK AV

BR IGH T PASEO

DELIGH T PASEO

HAPPY PASEO

SU NN Y PASEO

LAN TER N PASEO

OASIS PASEO

SPARKLEPASEO

JOLLYPASEO

RADIANT D R

AMHERST AV

VENTURA AV

SUNSET ST

LA JOLLA ST

CATALINA ST

CAMBRIA

PRIVADO

ENC NI TI AS AVE
AVILA

PRIVADO

HALTON PRIVADO

BASANITE AV

SHALE AV

DOLOMITE ST

BROCKRAM DR

KINGLET AV

CHATHAM ST

CLIFTON ST

CANTONA PASEO

FERGUSON PRIVADO

KANE DR

SU NSTONE ST
6 7
3 7
3 2 2
8j
8i
5 7 7
8h
8g

E FOURTH

S GROVE
E D
E G

E CHINO

E RIVERSIDE

S ARCH BI ALD

S HAVEN

E AIRPORT

E EDISON

N HAVEN

N GROVE

S MILLIKEN S HAMNER

S V NI EYARD

E EUCALYPTUS

S ET WI ANDA
E HOLT

E EIGHTH

E PHILADELPHIA

E INLAND EMPIRE

E JURUPA

S VINTAGE

N M LI L KI EN

N ETIWANDA

S WINEVILLE

N ARCH BI ALD

E SANTA ANA

S SUMNER

N V NI EYARD

E JURUPA

E EUCALYPTUS

E INLAND EMPIRE

E EDISON E EDISON

E EDISON

E PHILADELPHIA
± Approved by City Council on January 27, 2010
0 1 2
Miles
EXHIBIT LU-01

LAND USE PLAN
Note: The City of Ontario in its entirety is
located within the Airport Influence Area
of Ontario International Airport.

An area in which current or future
airport-related noise, overflight, safety,
or airspace protection factors may
significantly affect land uses or necessitate
restriction on those uses.

Refer to the Ontario Airport Land
Use Compatibility Plan for further
information.

1. Downtown

2. Airport Metro/Entertainment

3. Guasti

4. South Euclid

5. South Employment
Corridors

6. East Holt Blvd

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
3-1
existing conditions
SECTION 3: EXISTING CONDITIONS
This section, Existing Conditions, describes the existing physical conditions within and surrounding the CenterPark Specific Plan.

3.1 PROPERTY OWNERSHIPS
The CenterPark Specific Plan area is comprised of approximately 246.1 adjusted gross acres, excluding additional dedications to expand current roadways to the ultimate master planned ROW and required neighborhood edges per the City of Ontario Master Plan of Streets. The Specific Plan area consists of twenty eight parcels under ten different ownerships. The recorded parcels within the CenterPark Specific Plan are shown on Exhibit 3-1, Assessor’s Parcel Numbers.

EXHIBIT 3-1 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS

GROVE AVE

CUCAMONGA AVE

PARCO AVE

WALKER AVE

BON VIEW AVE

CAMPUS AVE

SULTANA AVE

EDISON AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

SCHAEFER AVE
0216-322-10
0216-322-04 0216-322-03
1053-331-04 1053-341-02
1053-311-01 1053-361-02 1053-351-02
1053-311-02 1053-361-01 1053-351-01
1053-371-01
1053-301-01
1053-301-02
1053-371-01
1053-321-03
1053-361-03
1053-321-02
1053-331-03
1053-331-01
1053-331-02
1053-341-01
0216-311-09
0216-311-01
0216-311-02
1053-321-01
0216-321-03
0216-321-08
1053-371-02
/

ONTARIO RANCH RD
N
341
3-2
EXHIBIT 3-2 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
AND WILLIAMSON ACT CONTRACT STATUS

3.2 WILLIAMSON ACT CONTRACTS
The California Land Conservation Act of 1965, commonly referred to as the Williamson Act, enables local governments to enter into contract with private landowners for the purpose of restricting specific parcels of land to agricultural or related open space use. In return, landowners receive property tax assessments that are much lower than normal because they are based upon farming and open space uses as opposed to full market value.

The Williamson Act Program is designed
as a mechanism for the preservation of
agricultural and open space lands in the
State of California. The 258 acres of the
Specific Plan area do not have active
Williamson Act Contracts. The current
property ownership and status of the
agricultural contracts are shown on
Exhibit 3-2, Property Ownership and
Williamson Act Contract Status.

EXPIRATION DATES:
2027
2028
342

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
3-3
existing conditions

3.3 EXISTING ON SITE IMPROVEMENTS
The CenterPark Specific Plan area has historically been used for agricultural purposes, primarily for dairy and field crop farming. The Specific Plan area is generally undeveloped with existing agricultural operations and rural residences scattered throughout the area, as illustrated on Exhibit 3-3, Existing and Surrounding Land Uses. Rural residential housing, farm buildings and other ancillary facilities occupy those areas not in active agricultural production. The natural vegetation and soil conditions that once occurred throughout the project area have been significantly altered through agricultural uses, leaving little or no native vegetation.

There are several dairy farm related buildings and structures within the project site that are considered potential historic resources by the City of Ontario. Dairy farm related buildings and structures over 45 years or older have been identified, documented and evaluated for national, state and local historic significance as part of the environmental review for the project.

Properties with buildings and/or structures that have been surveyed and determined to meet local and state designation criteria, will be considered for adaptive reuse, relocation or other mitigation measures as required by the City of Ontario Historic Preservation Commission.

3.4 SURROUNDING LAND USE CHARACTERISTICS
Land uses adjacent to the Specific Plan area include:
• North: Nursery/Field Crops, Dairy Operations and Rural Residential • South: Dairy Operations and Rural Residential
• West: Field Crops, Dairy Operations and Rural Residential • East: Field Crops, Dairy Operations and Rural Residential The Ontario Plan (TOP) designates the undeveloped areas located north of the Specific Plan area as Low Density Residential (LDR), Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) and Medium Density Residential (MDR).

The area to the west of the Specific Plan area is designated as Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Mixed-Use (MU), and the area to the east of the Specific Plan area is designated as Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Recreational Open Space (OS-R) and is within the Chino Airport Overlay area.

The current TOP land use designations for the undeveloped areas located south of the Specific Plan are Recreational Open Space (OS-R), Mixed-Use (MU) and Medium Density Residential (MDR) and they are within the Chino Airport Overlay area.
343
3-4
EXHIBIT 3-3 EXISTING AND

SURROUNDING LAND USES

EXISTING TOP LAND USE

BOUNDARIES

EXISTING WELLS
344

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
3-5
existing conditions
EXHIBIT 3-4 EXISTING CONDITIONS KEYMAP
N
1 2
3 4
5 6
6 12
11 7
17 8
10 9
13 14
15 16
345
3-6
Views of intersection between Campus Ave and SCE Easement Views of intersection between Cucamonga Ave and SCE Easement Views of intersection between Bon View Ave and SCE Easement Views of intersection between Grove Ave and SCE Easement 1 3
2 4
346

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
3-7
existing conditions
Views of intersection between Parco Avenue and SCE Easement Views of intersection between Bon View Ave and Ontario Ranch Rd Views of intersection between Campus Ave and Ontario Ranch Rd 5 7
6 347
3-8
Views of intersection between Cucamonga Ave and Ontario Ranch Rd Views of intersection between Grove Ave and Ontario Ranch Rd 8 9
348

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
3-9
existing conditions
Views of intersection between Parco Avenue and Ontario Ranch Rd Views of intersection between Campus Ave and (future) City of Ontario Grand Park Views of intersection between Walker Ave and Ontario Ranch Rd Views of intersection between Bon View Ave and (future) City of Ontario Grand Park 10 12
11 13
349
3-10
Views of intersection between Cucamonga Ave and (future) City of Ontario Grand Park Views of intersection between Parco Avenue and (future) City of Ontario Grand Park Views of intersection between Grove Ave and (future) City of Ontario Grand Park Views of intersection between Walker Ave and (future) City of Ontario Grand Park 14 16
15 17
350

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
3-11
existing conditions

3.5 TOPOGRAPHY
The Specific Plan area is relatively flat and generally slopes to the south as illustrated on Exhibit 3-5, Existing Site Topography. The site falls at an average slope of approximately 0.8% to 2.0%. The Specific Plan area generally drains to the south towards Eucalyptus Avenue, and into the Lower Cucamonga Spreading Grounds.

EXHIBIT 3-5 EXISTING SITE TOPOGRAPHY
Eucalyptus Ave
N
Campus Ave
Ontario Ranch Rd/
Edison Ave
Cucamonga Ave
Sultana Ave
Bon View Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Campus Ave
Bon View Ave
Cucamonga Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Baker Ave Baker Ave
Sultana Ave
Ontario Ranch Rd/
Edison Ave
686
688
692
694
690
698
700
696
351
3-12

3.6 EXISTING CIRCULATION AND ACCESS
• State Route 60 (SR 60) is located two and one quarter miles north of the CenterPark Specific Plan.

Currently the Specific Plan area connects to SR 60 through two major streets. These are Vineyard Avenue, located 1/2 mile east of the Specific Plan area, and Grove Avenue, which is located west of the Specific Plan area. Proposed on-site circulation improvements are discussed in greater detail in Section 4, Land Use Plan.
• Ontario Ranch Road is designated as an “8-Lane Other Principal Arterial Road” (160 ft. ROW) in the ‘Functional Roadway Classification’ of the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, which is part of The Ontario Plan and bisects the northern portion of the CenterPark Specific Plan boundary in an east/west direction. The existing Ontario Ranch Road is two paved lanes for east and west bound traffic with unpaved shoulders.
• Grove Avenue is designated as a “4-Lane Other Principal Arterial Road with multipurpose trail” (124 ft. ROW) in the ‘Functional Roadway Classification’ of the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, which is part of The Ontario Plan. It bisects the CenterPark Specific Plan boundary in a north/south direction. The existing Grove Avenue is two paved lanes for north and south bound traffic with paved shoulders on each side.
• Walker Avenue is designated as a “2-Lane Collector Street” (88 ft. ROW) in the ‘Functional Roadway Classification’ of the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, which is part of The Ontario Plan. It borders the CenterPark parcel to the east.
• Campus Avenue is designated as “4-Lane Minor Arterial Road” (108 ft. ROW) in the ‘Functional Roadway Classification’ of the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, which is part of The Ontario Plan. Campus Avenue borders the CenterPark parcel to the west and it’s currently a narrow rural paved roadway.
• Bon View Avenue is designated as “2-Lane Collector Street” (66 ft. ROW) in the ‘Functional Roadway Classification’ of the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, which is part of The Ontario Plan. Bon View Avenue traverses the CenterPark parcel to the west and it’s currently a narrow rural paved roadway. • South Cucamonga Avenue and Parco Avenue are shown on the TOP Land Use plan, but are not part of the City’s street master plan. They will be designed as Local Streets (60 ft. ROW). These streets are not currently paved or are partially paved in the general vicinity of the CenterPark Specific Plan. South Cucamonga Avenue and Parco Avenue are proposed to terminate at the north end of the Grand Park. The existing ROWs will be abandoned within the Grand Park property and to the south. 352

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
3-13
existing conditions

3.7 EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE /UTILITIES / PUBLIC SERVICES

3.7.1 Potable Water
The Specific Plan area lies within the 925 Pressure Zone. An existing 16-inch and 24-inch water main, located in Eucalyptus Avenue, provides water to the existing development to the south of the CenterPark Specific Plan. The developer of the CenterPark Specific Plan is responsible for extending water lines in the City master planned collector streets north to the Specific Plan area. On-site uses within the Specific Plan area are currently served by private wells, as illustrated on Exhibit 3-3, Existing and Surrounding Land Uses.

Upon development of the well site areas, these wells, or any other wells found on the property, will be abandoned per California Department of Water Resources Health Guidelines and the City of Ontario Guidelines. In compliance with the Chino Basin Water Master’s Well Procedure for Developers, a well use/ destruction plan and schedule for all existing private/agricultural wells shall be submitted to the City of Ontario for approval prior to the issuance of permits for any construction activity. If a private well is actively used for water supply, the Developer shall submit a plan to abandon such well and connect users to the City’s water system (residential to the domestic water system and agricultural to the recycled water system) when available. Wells shall be destroyed/abandoned per the California Water Resource Guidelines and require permitting from County Health Department. A copy of such permit shall be provided to the Engineering and Ontario Municipal Utilities Company (OMUC) prior to issuance of grading and/or building permits. If the Developer proposes temporary use of an existing agricultural well for purposes other than agriculture, such as grading, dust control, etc., the developer shall make a formal request to the City of Ontario for such use prior to issuance of permits for any construction activity. Upon approval, the Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City of Ontario and pay any applicable fees as set forth by the agreement. Existing wells may be converted to groundwater monitoring wells if feasible, at the City’s discretion.

3.7.2 Recycled Water
The existing rural residential and agricultural development within the CenterPark Specific Plan area has available recycled water. There is an existing 30” IEUA (Inland Empire Utilities Agency) recycled water line in Ontario Ranch Road, within the Specific Plan area, extending from the eastern boundary at Walker Avenue to Bon View Avenue and southerly in Bon View to Eucalyptus Avenue outside of the Specific Plan boundary. The developer of the CenterPark Specific Plan is responsible for connecting to these existing recycled water lines.

3.7.3 Sewer
Existing on-site residences utilize septic tanks and subsurface disposal fields. Prior to grading operations, existing septic tanks and subsurface disposal fields will need to be abandoned in accordance with the State of California Department of Health Services requirements. A City sewer main located in Merrill Avenue connects to the City sewer lines in the City master planned collector streets (Campus, Bon View, Grove and Walker Avenues). The developer of the CenterPark Specific Plan is responsible for extending sewer lines in the City master planned collector streets north to the Specific Plan area. 353
3-14

3.7.4 Drainage
The City of Ontario storm drain system is generally unimproved throughout the Specific Plan area and consists primarily of open earthen swales along area roadways.

Cucamonga Creek Channel, a major flood control channel, provides regional protection for conveying urban storm waters to the Prado Dam Basin.

3.7.5 Electricity
The CenterPark Specific Plan area is located within the service territory of Southern California Edison Company (SCE). Electrical facilities will be underground per Municipal Code.

3.7.6 Natural Gas
The Southern California Gas Company (SCG) provides natural gas service within the area near the Specific Plan.

3.7.7 Communication Systems
Frontier Communications provides telephone service within the CenterPark Specific Plan area.

3.7.8 Solid Waste
The City of Ontario Public Works Agency provides solid waste collection and disposal to newly developed areas by request.

3.8 HYDROLOGY
Since most of the CenterPark Specific Plan area has been in agricultural use, only a limited portion of the site is now covered with impervious surfaces. Normal rainfall to the area is able to percolate through on-site soils and does not result in high volumes of surface runoff, typically associated with urban use.

Ground waters within the area, as a whole, contain high concentrations of salt, attributable to historic agricultural activities such as dairy farming. The high organic content of on-site soils has contributed incrementally to the degradation of surface and groundwater quality.

3.9 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
There are two primary soil deposits present within the boundary of the CenterPark Specific Plan. The youngest surficial deposit, Eolian sands (Qhs), is comprised of wind-blown sands having fine to medium-sized grains.

These loose sands form sheets and low-dune deposits that have been stabilized by vegetation. These deposits are exposed in the eastern portion of the Ontario Ranch area and extend westward to an area defined generally by a diagonal line extending from Harrison Avenue within Riverside County on the south to Vineyard Avenue on the north. The second youngest surficial unit, a mediumgrained Holocene alluvium (Qhm), is present west of the Eolian sand. These are unconsolidated deposits of fine-to-course-grained sand with interbeds of gravel and silt.
354

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
3-15
existing conditions
The Specific Plan area contains delhi and hillmar loamy fine sands, as mapped by the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service in 1971 and 1980. Delhi series soils have been used for agriculture, primarily for grapes and citrus, since the 1800’s. Additional detailed geologic and soils information for the Specific Plan area is contained in the CenterPark Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report.

3.10 SEISMICITY
In accordance with the California Building Code, the development within the CenterPark Specific Plan area will follow procedures and regulations designed to ensure that all development occurs in a safe manner relative to those known hazards. The CenterPark Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report contains detailed seismic information including a seismicity analysis of the Specific Plan area.

3.11 VEGETATION
The Specific Plan area has been extensively used for agricultural operations including dairy and field crop uses. Those areas not in active agricultural production are occupied by rural residential housing or are vacant.

The natural vegetation and soil conditions that once occurred throughout the Specific Plan area have been significantly altered through the agricultural uses, leaving little or no native vegetation. The CenterPark Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report contains additional analysis of the vegetation conditions within the Specific Plan area.

3.12 EXISTING NPDES COMPLIANCE
In the existing conditions, NPDES requirements are enforced under the Agricultural Permit issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (Developer to verify the Agency). 355
This page intentionally left blank
356

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
4-1
land use plan
SECTION 4: LAND USE PLAN
This section of the CenterPark Specific Plan discusses the land uses proposed within the CenterPark development. Land uses include the residential, commercial/mixed-use, retail, office, parks and open space, and community facility components planned for CenterPark.

4.1 COMMUNITY DESIGN
A strong sense of place or community identity is established for CenterPark through comprehensively planned relationships between developed open space and urban development. This Genius of Place creates a designed natural open space framework, interacting with mixed retail and office centers which anchor traditional residential neighborhoods Collectively these neighborhoods provide a variety of housing types designed around a traditional grid pattern of streets and sidewalks. Off-street bike trails and an off-street multi-use trail provide safe corridors for bicycle access throughout the CenterPark community.

Residential and mixed-use developments shall front Grand Park. No walls shall be incorporated on the frontage of the park.

4.2 MIXED-USE PLANNING AREAS
Mixed-use development is allowed in Planning Areas 4, 5, 10 and 11. These Mixed-use Planning Areas will allow for development of neighborhood retail uses at a maximum 0.30 FAR and office uses at a maximum

0.70 FAR, intended to meet the needs of the surrounding community.

The maximum allowable retail development is 115,809 sq. ft. and the maximum office development is 135,110 sq. ft. and the maximum residential development is 1,086 units within the Specific Plan Mixed-Use Planning Areas. Mixed-Use Planning Areas in CenterPark allow for up to 70% of the area to be developed as higher density residential uses with a maximum density of 35 dwelling units per acre.

The residential uses will complement the office and retail development and increase the variety of living choices within the western area of Ontario Ranch.
357
4-2
EXHIBIT 4-1 LAND USE PLAN
Eucalyptus Ave
Campus Ave
Edison Ave/
Ontario Ranch Rd
Cucamonga Ave
Sultana Ave
Bon View Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Campus Ave
Bon View Ave
Cucamonga Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Baker Ave Baker Ave
Sultana Ave
Edison Ave/
Ontario Ranch Rd
1 MDR

15.91 AC
2 MDR

15.57 AC
3 MDR

7.70 AC
4 MU

7.13 AC
5 MU

7.41 AC
6 MDR

7.33 AC
10 MU

14.10 AC
11 MU

15.67 AC
7 MDR

23.67 AC
8 MDR

24.20 AC
9 MDR

12.18 AC
12 MDR

15.46 AC
13 MDR

23.75 AC
14 OS-R

13.33 AC
15 OS-R

13.11 AC
16 OS-R

9.90 AC
18 OS-R

13.44 AC
17 OS-R

6.20 AC
19 OS-NR

2.26 AC
20 OS-NR

2.68 AC
21 OS-NR

2.96 AC
22 OS-NR

3.38 AC
Specific Plan Boundary
MDR Medium Density Residential
MU Mixed-Use
OS-R Open Space-Recreation
OS-NR Open Space-Non Rec

FULL ACCESS

POTENTIAL ACCESS POINT
N
358

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
4-3
land use plan
TABLE 4-1 LAND USE PLAN SUMMARY
PA LAND USE TOP 2050

ACREAGE

DENSITY PER
EIR

MAXIMUM
UNITS

MAXIMUM
RETAIL

4.3 RESIDENTIAL PLANNING AREA
Residential development is allowed in the MDR Planning Areas 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12 and 13. A variety of residential uses are allowed in CenterPark. The maximum number of allowed units within the the Mixed-Use component is 1,086 units and 3,207 units within the Residential planning areas of the Specific Plan for a total maximum of 4,293 units with varied densities encouraged to be developed into smaller neighborhoods.

Several housing types may be developed within a specific planning area and may be blended to allow an overall density up to 25 du/ac. The blending of residential densities within the plan is encouraged as long as the density within any one planning area does not exceed 35 du/ac.The Specific Plan allows for a variety of housing types up to 5 stories maximum height.

The following housing types are allowed within the Specific Plan area:

CONVENTIONAL SFD – 1 & 2 STORY
This housing type includes conventional single family neighborhoods, traditional single-family and cluster SFD neighborhoods, including condominium developments, with 1 and 2 story buildings.

SMALL LOT/CLUSTER SFD – 2 & 3 STORY
This housing type includes conventional detached single-family neighborhoods, traditional single-family and cluster SFD neighborhoods, including condominium developments, with buildings up to 3 stories tall.

ATTACHED SFA – 2 STORY
This housing type includes duplexes/paired homes, triplexes, townhomes/rowtowns and stacked flats, including condominium and apartment developments, with buildings up to 2 stories tall.

ATTACHED SFA – 3 STORY
This housing type includes duplexes/paired homes, triplexes, townhomes/rowtowns and stacked flats, including condominium and apartment developments, with buildings up to 3 stories tall.

ATTACHED SFA/MULTI-FAMILY – 3+ TO 5 STORIES
This housing type includes attached homes, including condominium and apartment developments, with buildings greater than 3 stories tall with a maximum of 5 story buildings.

4.4 RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE
Recreational Open Space uses are planned within Planning Areas 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18. There are 55.98 acres of the Specific Plan which are designated for Recreational Open Space (OS-R). This area has been designated to be part of the City of Ontario Grand Park.

LANDSCAPE PLANNING
Landscape and architectural improvements within the City of Ontario Grand Park, including planting, hardscaping and recreational amenities within these Planning Areas will be consistent with the City of Ontario Grand Park Master Plan. The final improvements within the Grand Park will submitted as part of a Development Plan application to be reviewed and approved by the City. 360

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-1
infrastructure
SECTION 5: INFRASTRUCTURE
The infrastructure, utilities and public services to be provided, as part of the development of the CenterPark Specific Plan, are discussed in this section.

5.1 CIRCULATION
The Circulation Plan for CenterPark implements the surrounding Master Plan streets identified by the City of Ontario and provides access to the neighborhood commercial and residential planning areas within the Specific Plan boundaries. Within the site, a traditional, grid-like street system reinforces the overall community character and design. In addition to providing safe and efficient movement of vehicular traffic through the project, the Circulation Plan also provides a safe environment for pedestrian movement and bicycle traffic to reduce the reliance on the automobile as a means of travel. Transit stops and bus turnouts shall be provided as required by the City of Ontario and Omnitrans along the Master Plan streets, which are within the CenterPark Specific Plan area. The Exhibit 5-1, City of Ontario Road Classification System establishes the hierarchy and general location of roadways within CenterPark.

The hierarchy of streets, established by the City’s framework, is further developed within the Specific Plan boundary with a safe and efficient network of public neighborhood streets and private streets. Internal vehicular access and circulation is shown in Exhibit 5-2, Conceptual Circulation Plan. The street alignments shown are conceptual; and the final street alignments within the Specific Plan will be determined with TTM approval.

The minimum design speeds to be used for centerline curve radii, super elevation, corner and approach sight distances, vertical and horizontal alignment and sight distances for the Master Plan streets are listed below:

Grove Ave. 50 m.p.h.

Walker Ave. 45 m.p.h.

Ontario Ranch Rd. 50 m.p.h.

Campus Ave. 45 m.p.h.

Bon View Ave. 45 m.p.h.
361
5-2

5.1.1 Master Plan Roadways
The project site includes three City of Ontario arterial roadways, as identified in Figure M-01, Roadway Classification Plan of the Policy Plan, providing access to and from the site. Ontario Ranch Road bisects the site in an east/west direction, Grove Avenue bisects the site in a north/south direction and Walker Avenue borders the project site on the east. The site also includes two City of Ontario collector roadways, as identified in Figure M-01, Roadway Classification Plan. Bon View Avenue traverses the site in a north/ south direction and Campus Avenue borders the project site on the west.

Phasing and construction of the improvements shall be implemented as required by the City Engineer and pursuant to the mitigation measures identified in the EIR and the conditions of approval adopted with the approval of tentative maps for the project. Locations and construction of bus turnouts are required within the project to the satisfaction of the City of Ontario and Omnitrans.

Additional right-of-way may be required to accommodate additional left turn and right turn lanes at intersections based on required queue lengths per the Traffic Impact Analysis/Specific Plan EIR.

The developer shall construct half-to-full width roadway improvements on project frontage streets including off-site improvements as follows:
362

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-3
infrastructure
This page intentionally left blank
363
5-4
EXHIBIT 5-1 CITY OF ONTARIO ROAD CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM GROVE AVE CUCAMONGA AVE PARCO AVE WALKER AVE VINEYARD AVE

CUCAMONGA CHANNEL

CARPENTER AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE

BON VIEW AVE

CAMPUS AVE

SULTANA AVE

EUCLID AVE

MERRILL AVE

ONTARIO RANCH RD

EUCALYPTUS AVE

SCHAEFER AVE

CHINO AVE

RIVERSIDE DR
Other Principal Arterial:
8 Lanes
6 Lanes
4 Lanes
Minor Arterial:
6 Lanes
4 Lanes
Collector Street:
4 Lanes
2 Lanes
Local Industrial Street

CenterPark Specific Plan
LEGEND
N
364

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-5
infrastructure
EXHIBIT 5-2 CONCEPTUAL CIRCULATION PLAN
D:\TGG Remote Files\TGG 1996-Present\23011 Sares Regis\Exhibit\CENTER PARK SPECIFIC PLAN\LINKED IMAGES\Centerpark_Conceptual Landscape Plan - Standard\TOP Land Use_040124_N NOTES:

1. Traffic signal locations are based on The Ontario Plan traffic model and the City’s Development Impact Fee (DIF) Program for ½ mile and ¼ mile locations. The potential traffic signal locations may or may not be needed in the locations shown based on the results and recommendations of traffic studies prepared for implementing development projects.

2. Additional traffic signals may be required based on the locations of future tract entries.

3. Enhanced pedestrian crossings will be required along Grand Park Avenue as necessary to facilitate pedestrian connectivity from the Grand Park to the residential developments.

N
365
5-6

5.1.1.1 Ontario Ranch Road
The Mobility Element of the Policy Plan (Figure M-01 Roadway Classification Plan) designates Ontario Ranch Road as an “8-Lane Other Principal Arterial” (160 ft. ROW). Ontario Ranch Road is also considered as a truck route and it extends along the north boundary of the Specific Plan area and will provide access to CenterPark. The proposed improvements to Ontario Ranch Road are illustrated on Exhibit 5-3, Ontario Ranch Road. Parking is prohibited along Ontario Ranch Road. Refer to Exhibit 5-3 for minimum street improvements required by the CenterPark Specific Plan.

EXHIBIT 5-3 ONTARIO RANCH ROAD

NORTH SOUTH
65' 65'
130'
160'
15' 12' 12' 13' 26' 13' 12' 12' 15'
Median
R/WR/W
(A) (B)
15' 15'

WEST EAST
42'
84'
124'
28' 13' 15'
Median
R/WR/W
(A)
20'
42'
15' 13'
20'

WEST EAST
42'
84'
108'
12'
42'
12'

PROJECT

PROJECT SITE

PROJECT SITE
5' 10'
Neighborhood Edge
45'
10' 5' 8'
Multipurpose Trail
Neighborhood Edge
45'
5' 7'
Neighborhood Edge
40'
.
(B)
7' 5' 8'
Multipurpose Trail .

Neighborhood Edge
40'
NOTES:
(A) Sidewalk to be included on Parkway. See Exhibits 7-11 to 7-14 for specific sidewalks, trails and landscaping within City-planned neighborhood edges and landscape (lettered) lots.
(B) Includes Both Sidewalk and Multipurpose Trail.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. Refer to the City of Ontario standard drawings for more detailed street section requirements. The number of lanes and lane configurations may vary by street and will be determined by City engineering staff through the project Specific Plan approval and/or public improvement plan check process.

2. Refer to the approved Specific Plan documents, as noted hereon or otherwise, for detailed street section information.

3. R/W indicates roadway right-of-way width not including additional “Neighborhood Edge”. 366

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-7
infrastructure

5.1.1.2 Grove Avenue
Grove Avenue is a designated “4-Lane Other Principal Arterial Road with multipurpose trail” (124 ft.

ROW). Grove Avenue will provide access to and from CenterPark and traverses the project site in a north/south direction. Grove Avenue will be improved as depicted on Exhibit 5-4, Grove Avenue.

Parking is prohibited on Grove Avenue. Grove Avenue shall provide multi-use trail lanes on the east side of the roadway, within the Specific Plan area. Refer to Exhibit 5-4 for minimum street improvements required by the CenterPark Specific Plan.

EXHIBIT 5-4 GROVE AVENUE
NOTES:
(A) Sidewalk to be included on Parkway. See Exhibits 7-11 to 7-14 for specific sidewalks, trails and landscaping within City-planned neighborhood edges and landscape (lettered) lots.

GENERAL NOTES:

2. Refer to the approved Specific Plan documents, as noted hereon or otherwise, for detailed street section information.

3. R/W indicates roadway right-of-way width not including additional “Neighborhood Edge”.

NORTH SOUTH
65' 65'
130'
160'
15' 12' 12' 13' 26' 13' 12' 12' 15'
Median
R/WR/W
(A) (B)
15' 15'

WEST EAST
42'
84'
124'
28' 13' 15'
Median
R/WR/W
(A)
20'
42'
15' 13'
20'

WEST EAST
42'
84'
108'
R/WR/W
(A) (B)
12'
42'
12'

WEST EAST
88'

PROJECT
SITE

PROJECT SITE

PROJECT SITE
5' 10'
Neighborhood Edge
45'
10' 5' 8'
Multipurpose Trail
Neighborhood Edge
45'
5' 7'
Neighborhood Edge
40'
.
(B)
7' 5' 8'
Multipurpose Trail .

Neighborhood Edge
40'
. 5' 7'
Neighborhood Edge
35'
8'
Multipurpose Trail
7' 5' .

Neighborhood Edge
35'
Pkwy SWSW Pkwy
367
5-8

5.1.1.3 Walker Avenue
Walker Avenue is designated in the General Plan as a “2-Lane Collector Street” (88 ft. ROW).

Walker Avenue will provide access to and from CenterPark along the eastern boundary of the project site. Walker Avenue will be improved as depicted on Exhibit 5-5, Walker Avenue. Parking is prohibited on Walker Avenue. Refer to Exhibit 5-5 for minimum street improvements required by the CenterPark Specific Plan.

EXHIBIT 5-5 WALKER AVENUE
NOTES:
(A) Sidewalk to be included on Parkway. See Exhibits 7-11 to 7-14 for specific sidewalks, trails and landscaping within City-planned neighborhood edges and landscape (lettered) lots.
(B) Includes Both Sidewalk and Multipurpose Trail.

GENERAL NOTES:

2. Refer to the approved Specific Plan documents, as noted hereon or otherwise, for detailed street section information.

3. R/W indicates roadway right-of-way width not including additional “Neighborhood Edge”. 28' 13' 15'
Median
15' 13'

WEST EAST
42'
84'
108'
R/WR/W
(A) (B)
12'
42'
12'

WEST EAST
32'
64'
88'
R/WR/W
(A) (B)
12'
32'
12'

WEST EAST
48'
66'
R/WR/W
(A) (A)
9'9'

WEST EAST

PROJECT
SITE

PROJECT SITE

PROJECT SITE
5' 7'
Neighborhood Edge
40'
.
7' 5' 8'
Multipurpose Trail .

Neighborhood Edge
40'
.

Neighborhood Edge
30'
5' 7' 8'
Multipurpose Trail
7' 5' .

Neighborhood Edge
30'
. 5' 7'
Neighborhood Edge
35'
8'
Multipurpose Trail
7' 5' .

Neighborhood Edge
35'
Pkwy SW
Pkwy SW
SW Pkwy
SW Pkwy
WEST
40'
66'
R/W
(A)
13'

PROJECT SITE
368

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-9
infrastructure

5.1.1.4 Campus Avenue
Campus Avenue is designated in the General Plan as a “4-Lane Minor Arterial Road” (108 ft. ROW).

Campus Avenue will provide access to and from CenterPark along the western boundary of the project site. Campus Avenue will be improved as depicted on Exhibit 5-6, Campus Avenue. Parking is prohibited on Campus Avenue. Refer to Exhibit 5-6 for minimum street improvements required by the CenterPark Specific Plan.

EXHIBIT 5-6 CAMPUS AVENUE
NOTES:
(A) Sidewalk to be included on Parkway. See Exhibits 7-11 to 7-14 for specific sidewalks, trails and landscaping within City-planned neighborhood edges and landscape (lettered) lots.
(B) Includes Both Sidewalk and Multipurpose Trail.

GENERAL NOTES:

2. Refer to the approved Specific Plan documents, as noted hereon or otherwise, for detailed street section information.

3. R/W indicates roadway right-of-way width not including additional “Neighborhood Edge”. 15' 12' 12' 13' 26' 13' 12' 12' 15'
Median
(A) (B)

WEST EAST
42'
84'
124'
28' 13' 15'
Median
R/WR/W
(A)
20'
42'
15' 13'
20'

WEST EAST
42'
84'
108'
R/WR/W
(A) (B)
12'
42'
12'

WEST EAST
32'
64'
88'
R/WR/W
(A) (B)
12'
32'
12'

WEST EAST
66'

PROJECT
SITE

PROJECT SITE

PROJECT SITE
5' 10'
Neighborhood Edge
45'
10' 5' 8'
Multipurpose Trail
Neighborhood Edge
45'
5' 7'
Neighborhood Edge
40'
.
(B)
7' 5' 8'
Multipurpose Trail .

Neighborhood Edge
40'
.

Neighborhood Edge
30'
5' 7' 8'
Multipurpose Trail
7' 5' .

Neighborhood Edge
30'
. 5' 7'
Neighborhood Edge
35'
8'
Multipurpose Trail
7' 5' .

Neighborhood Edge
35'
Pkwy SW
Pkwy SW
SW Pkwy
SW Pkwy
WEST
66'

PROJECT SITE
369
5-10

5.1.1.5 Bon View Avenue
Bon View Avenue is designated in the General Plan as a “2-Lane Collector Street” (66 ft. ROW).

Bon View Avenue will provide access to and from CenterPark and traverses the project site in a north/south direction. Bon View Avenue will be improved as depicted on Exhibit 5-7, Bon View Avenue. Parking is prohibited on Bon View Avenue. Refer to Exhibit 5-7 for minimum street improvements required by the CenterPark Specific Plan. Bon View Avenue curb-to-curb is 48 ft. south of Ontario Ranch Road and curb-to-curb 40 ft. north of Ontario Ranch Road.

EXHIBIT 5-7 BON VIEW AVENUE
NOTES:
(A) Sidewalk to be included on Parkway. See Exhibits 7-11 to 7-14 for specific sidewalks, trails and landscaping within City-planned neighborhood edges and landscape (lettered) lots.

Due to utility constraints, Bon View Avenue may need to be constructed as a tilt section.

GENERAL NOTES:

2. Refer to the approved Specific Plan documents, as noted hereon or otherwise, for detailed street section information.

3. R/W indicates roadway right-of-way width not including additional “Neighborhood Edge”.

WEST EAST
32'
64'
88'
R/WR/W
(A) (B)
12'
32'
12'

WEST EAST
48'
66'
R/WR/W
(A) (A)
9'9'

WEST EAST
24' to 36'
48' to 60'
R/WR/W
(A) (A)
12'12'
72'

WEST EAST
OJECT
ITE

PROJECT SITE

PROJECT SITE
Neighborhood Edge
30'
5' 7' 8'
Multipurpose Trail
7' 5' .

Neighborhood Edge
30'
5' 7'
ood Edge
5'
8'
Multipurpose Trail
7' 5' .

Neighborhood Edge
35'
Pkwy SW
Pkwy SW
SW Pkwy
SW Pkwy

WEST EAST
40'
66'
R/WR/W
(A) (A)
13' 13'

PROJECT SITE

BON VIEW AVENUE

SOUTH OF ONTARIO RANCH ROAD

BON VIEW AVENUE

NORTH OF ONTARIO RANCH ROAD
370

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-11
infrastructure
EXHIBIT 5-8 PARCO AVENUE AND CUCAMONGA AVENUE
NOTES:
(A) Sidewalk to be included on Parkway. See Exhibits 7-11 to 7-14 for specific sidewalks, trails and landscaping within City-planned neighborhood edges and landscape (lettered) lots.

GENERAL NOTES:

2. Refer to the approved Specific Plan documents, as noted hereon or otherwise, for detailed street section information.

3. R/W indicates roadway right-of-way width not including additional “Neighborhood Edge”.

WEST EAST
48'
66'
R/WR/W
(A) (A)
9'9'

WEST EAST
24' to 36'
48' to 60'
R/WR/W
(A) (A)
12'12'
50'
72'
10'
Median
R/W
(A)
20'
R/W
20'
(A)
30'
Bldg. to Bldg.

WEST EAST
30'
Bldg. to Bldg.

PROJECT SITE

PROJECT
SITE
Neighborhood Edge
30'
Neighborhood Edge
30'
WEST
40'
66'
R/W
(A)
13'

PROJECT SIT

5.1.1.6 Parco Avenue and Cucamonga Avenue
Parco Avenue and Cucamonga Avenue are designated in the General Plan as “Local Roadway” (60 ft. ROW). Parco Avenue and Cucamonga Avenue will provide access to and from CenterPark and they traverse the project site in a north/south direction. Parco Avenue and Cucamonga Avenue will be improved as depicted on Exhibit 5-8, Parco Avenue and Cucamonga Avenue. Parking is allowed on Parco Avenue and Cucamonga Avenue within the Specific Plan area. Refer to Exhibit 5-8 for minimum street improvements required by the CenterPark Specific Plan.
371
5-12

5.1.2 Local Streets
Streets (public, private, local, etc.) that provide vehicular and pedestrian access to and through neighborhoods and communities shall provide 5 ft. sidewalks and 7 ft. parkways. Public local streets within residential areas are designed to distribute vehicular traffic from the Master Plan streets adjacent to the project site into and through residential neighborhoods.

Local Backbone Streets. Connecting the above regional backbone roadways, the project’s local backbone streets will connect the project’s various components and provide for safe and efficient vehicular circulation. Internal project access points will be taken from Campus Avenue on the west side of the project and Walker Avenue on the east side. Alternative internal street connections may be allowed subject to the approval of the City Engineer.

Local Neighborhood/Private Streets. Local neighborhood/private streets that carry neighborhood related traffic and be constructed with a 60 ft. right-of-way, which includes a 36 ft. paved section with parking on both sides and a minimum 12 ft. landscaped parkway with sidewalk. Themed streets will have an additional 5 ft. wide lettered lot along the theme street edge, located adjacent to right-of-way, to be maintained by HOA.

If future site plans propose private streets, they should be shown on the proposed tentative subdivision map and should be labeled “Private Streets”, otherwise all local streets will be considered public.

Intersections at public streets shall incorporate chokers in accordance with City of Ontario Traffic & Transportation Guidelines. Any proposed gated access shall be designed with adequate stacking and turnaround facilities.

A modified grid network of local streets will provide internal circulation throughout CenterPark for access to individual neighborhoods and residences. The proposed regional park will be accessible via local public streets. The proposed improvements for interior local streets are illustrated in Exhibit 5-9, Local Streets. 372

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-13
infrastructure
EXHIBIT 5-9 LOCAL STREETS
NOTES:
(A) Sidewalk to be included on Parkway. See Exhibits 7-11 to 7-14 for specific sidewalks, trails and landscaping within City-planned neighborhood edges and landscape (lettered) lots.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. Refer to the City of Ontario standard drawings for more detailed street section requirements. The number of lanes and lane configurations may vary by street and will be reviewed by City engineering staff through the project Specific Plan approval and/or public improvement plan check process.

2. Refer to the approved Specific Plan documents, as noted hereon or otherwise, for detailed street section information.

3. R/W indicates roadway right-of-way width not including additional “Neighborhood Edge”.

WEST EAST
24' to 36'
48' to 60'
R/WR/W
(A) (A)
12'12'
50'
72'
10'
Median
R/W
(A)
20'
R/W
20'
(A)
20'
30'

VATE DRIVES

AND ALLEYS
5' 5'
Bldg. to Bldg.

WEST EAST
24' to 26'
30'
3' 3'
Bldg. to Bldg.

Fire Access
1-WAY DRIVE
(Diagonal Parking)

PROJECT SITE

PROJECT
SITE

5.1.2.1 Private Streets
Private streets are encouraged in residential neighborhoods where higher density detached home types and attached buildings are designed with an urban character and front setbacks. These streets, with narrower paved sections, are used to reduce travel speeds within residential neighborhoods and to manage on-site resident and guest parking. Private streets are also intended to provide pedestrian circulation and encourage pedestrian activity within and between adjacent neighborhoods.

Private streets within single family residential neighborhoods reflect a traditional character with landscaped parkways and trees shading sidewalks where homes and front doors face them. Private streets will be designed with a minimum curb-to-curb dimension of 24 ft. with no parking. The minimum curb-to-curb dimension may be increased to allow for public utilities, for on-street parking, and for fire accessibility as required by the city’s latest requirements for public utility mains within public utility easements and subject to city’s discretion. The minimum paved width for private streets with parallel parking on one side is 32 ft. and 36 ft. for private streets with parallel parking on both sides. Private streets shall include 7 ft. landscaped parkways and 5 ft. sidewalks where they provide vehicular and pedestrian within, and between, neighborhoods in the Specific Plan. On-street perpendicular parking is allowed as an alternative to parallel parking. Perpendicular parking stalls shall be a minimum of 9 ft. x 18 ft. in size. The curb-to-curb dimensions for private streets and drives are subject to the approval of the City Planning and Engineering Departments and OMUC.
373
5-14
EXHIBIT 5-10 COMMON DRIVES, PRIVATE DRIVES AND ALLEYS
24' to 36'
48' to 60'
R/WR/W
(A) (A)
12'12'
50'
72'
10'
Median
R/W
(A)
20'
R/W
20'
(A)
20'
30'
RIVES
LEYS
5' 5'
Bldg. to Bldg.
8'24' 10'
gonal
rking
Bldg
Setback

WEST EAST
24' to 26'
30'
3' 3'
Bldg. to Bldg.

Fire Access
8' 24'
4'
Sidewalk

AY DRIVE
nal Parking)
8' 24' 4
Side
Sidewalk
4'
8'
(TYP.)
4'
Sidewalk
(TYP.)

PROJECT
SITE

5.1.2.2 Common Drives, Private Drives and Alleys
Common Drives, Private Drives, and Alleys provide specific access to individual homes. Access is off a public, private, local, or neighborhood street. Private drives and alleys are proposed within the CenterPark Specific Plan and will be constructed with a 20 ft. wide right-of-way. Private drives will be a minimum of 20 ft. paved travel lanes with no parking allowed. A minimum of 30 ft. is required between buildings located on each side of the private drive. The minimum pavement width for private drives may be increased to allow for public utilities as required by the City’s latest requirements for public utility mains within public utility easements, and subject to the City’s discretion. Final design of private drives will be subject to planning, engineering, OMUC and fire department approval concurrent with tentative subdivision map approval.

Common Drives. Common drives will be constructed with a 20 ft. minimum right-of-way. Common drives will contain a minimum 20 ft. travel lane and a 24 ft. travel lane for emergency access roads.

A 30 ft. minimum distance is required between buildings on each side of the common drive. Final alley design shall be subject to review and approval by the planning, engineering, and fire departments. See Exhibit 5-10, Common Drives, Private Drives and Alleys.

Private drives are also proposed within the Specific Plan to provide secondary internal vehicular and pedestrian circulation. These private drives generally include public or private utilities. The minimum width shall be 24 ft. to 30 ft.

Alleys are proposed within the CenterPark Specific Plan. Dead-end alleys shall be a minimum of 20 ft. wide and generally do not include public utilities. These alleys are generally intended to provide access to garages. A minimum of 30 ft. is required between garages on each side of a private drive. - Paved section may be widened to 26 ft. in 3-story neighborhoods or in conditions where the additional paved width is required to accommodate public utilities as required by the City’s latest requirements for public utility mains within public utility easements, and subject to the City’s discretion. 374

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-15
infrastructure
Chockers and short residential blocks encourage
pedestrian activity
Convenient parking adjacent to parks
Roundabout
Connectivity with sidewalks and walkways

5.1.3 Traffic Calming
The site plan for CenterPark is designed with a traditional street layout with a modified grid layout allowing for safe and convenient travel choices for future residents and visitors to the regional park.

Traditional streets are attractive and comfortable for pedestrians and bicyclists within the community.

Traffic calming devices incorporated into neighborhood streets may include traffic circles at selected intersections and will include intersection chokers at public street intersections. Traffic calming within CenterPark is designed with the following goals:
• Reduction in vehicular traffic speeds
• Reduction in traffic-related noise
• Reduction in fuel consumption
• Increased efficiency in vehicular circulation
• Improved pedestrian experience and safer intersections that encourage walking • Improved traffic flow and visibility at intersections for bicyclists A few examples of traffic calming devices are shown below:

The City may limit or prohibit parking on public streets that are wide enough to allow for parking at selected locations such as near intersections or crosswalks, at entry locations or higher traffic areas and areas where increased sight lines are required. Restricted parking will be at the discretion of the City Engineer. 375
5-16

5.1.3.1 Traffic Circles
Traffic circles, commonly called roundabouts are used to improve traffic circulation at intersections that would require four-way stop signs or other traffic controlling measure. These features help reduce vehicular speeds and allow for safe and controlled pedestrian crossings. Traffic circles are proposed at the intersections of Bon View Avenue and Grand Park Avenue and Grand Park Avenue and a future public or private roadway approximately midway between Campus Avenue and Bon View Avenue. Additional traffic circles may be proposed along Grand Park Avenue subject to approval by the City Engineer.

Traffic circles within CenterPark will be constructed according to City of Ontario Standard Drawings.

5.1.3.2 Intersection Chokers
Intersection chokers improve intersection visibility, define appropriate parking areas and reduce the crosswalk distance at neighborhood street intersections. These chokers will be incorporated at all four-way and “T” intersections of public streets per Traffic and Transportation Design Guidelines for Chokers Installations. Additional chockers will be constructed as required subject to the discretion of the City Engineer.

5.1.4 Pedestrian Circulation
Off-street pedestrian circulation is available throughout CenterPark by means of the interconnected, paved sidewalk system within the roadway right-of-way, separated from vehicular travel lanes by a landscaped parkway. The CenterPark pedestrian system provides connectivity among residential neighborhoods and to all private parks within CenterPark.

The plan also provides connectivity with off-site areas via City master planned multipurpose trails/ bikeways located within the neighborhood edge along the perimeter of the CenterPark Specific Plan area.

5.1.5 City Master Planned Trails and Bikeways
Multipurpose trails are an integral component in creating accessibility and mobility within and around CenterPark. A multi-use trail site is planned along the south side of Ontario Ranch Road and along the eastern side of Grove Avenue and Campus Avenue. The City also has planned a Class II bicycle lane on the west side of Walker Avenue which bounds the project site on the east, and may be utilized by the public.

CenterPark’s Master Plan for pedestrian and bicycle circulation is illustrated on Exhibit 5-11, Conceptual Pedestrian and Regional Trail Circulation Plan.
376

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-17
infrastructure

5.1.6 Proposed Local Trails and Paseos
The site plan for CenterPark may include additional internal trails or paseos that provide additional pedestrian accessibility between neighborhoods, to community parks and amenities and to the regional park in the center of the Specific Plan area. Trails and paseos shall be established within the minimum 30 ft. wide lettered lots.

5.1.7 Parks
The Ontario Plan (Policy PR1-5) has established a standard of 5 acres of parkland (public and private) per 1,000 residents, with a minimum of 2 acres of developed private park space per 1,000 residents (Policy PR1-6). Private parks are required to be within a quarter mile walking/biking distance from each residence.

This private park requirement may be met within any residential development or by satisfying the in-lieu park development impact fee as approved by the City. Fees will be paid to fulfill the balance of the City’s park requirement (the remaining 3 acres per 1, 000 residents).

As discussed in the previous Section 4.2, Parks and Recreational Facilities, parks will be provided throughout CenterPark (Exhibit 7-10, Landscape Framework Plan). 377
5-18
EXHIBIT 5-11 CONCEPTUAL PEDESTRIAN AND REGIONAL TRAIL CIRCULATION PLAN GROVE AVE CUCAMONGA AVE PARCO AVE WALKER AVE VINEYARD AVE CUCAMONGA CHANNEL CARPENTER AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE

BON VIEW AVE

CAMPUS AVE

SULTANA AVE

EUCLID AVE

MERRILL AVE

ONTARIO RANCH RD

EUCALYPTUS AVE

SCHAEFER AVE

CHINO AVE

RIVERSIDE DRIVE
Multipurpose Trail
Class I Bicycle Lane
Class II Bicycle Lane
CenterPark Specific Plan Area
LEGEND
N
378

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-19
infrastructure
EXHIBIT 5-12 INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PLAN
N
Eucalyptus AveCampus Ave
Edison Ave/
Ontario Ranch Rd
Cucamonga Ave
Sultana Ave
Bon View Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Campus Ave
Bon View Ave
Cucamonga Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Baker Ave Baker Ave
Sultana Ave
Edison Ave/
Ontario Ranch Rd
Grand Park Ave Grand Park Ave NEIGHBORHOOD PARK CITY MASTER PLANNED MULTI-USE TRAILS BACKBONE PRIVATE STREET PUBLIC STREET POTENTIAL ACCESS POINT FULL ACCESS SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY (CONCEPTUAL LOCATION) SIDEWALKS / PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION (CONCEPTUAL LOCATION) ROUND-A-BOUT (CONCEPTUAL LOCATION) Eucalyptus Ave Campus Ave
Bon View Ave
Cucamonga Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Baker Ave
Sultana Ave
Grand Park Ave Grand Park Ave

SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY

FULL ACCESS

POTENTIAL ACCESS POINT

PUBLIC STREET

BACKBONE PRIVATE STREET

CITY MASTER PLANNED MULTI-USE TRAILS

NEIGHBORHOOD PARK (CONCEPTUAL LOCATION)

SIDEWALKS / PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION (CONCEPTUAL LOCATION)

ROUND-A-BOUT (CONCEPTUAL LOCATION)
379
5-20

5.2 PUBLIC UTILITIES
Potable water, recycled water, sewer and storm drain utilities may be designated as “public utilities” located within a public street. The minimum width of a PUE (Public Utility Easement) for each public utility main is 20 ft. centered on the public utility main. The minimum width of a PUE and curb-to-curb width for two public utility mains (depending on utility sizes) is 24 ft. The minimum width of a PUE and curb-to-curb width for three public utility mains (depending on utility sizes) is 30 ft. Private utilities are not allowed within PUEs.

Any proposed public utilities within private streets shall be subject to City approval and contained within acceptable easements, access, and separation requirements. The CenterPark Covenants, Codes, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall contain language that requires all proposed work by the Homeowner Association (HOA) within said easements, be plan-checked and inspected by the City, including all applicable fees. Generally, utilities will not be accepted as public within dead-end private alleys, parking areas or driveways.

Master planned utilities serving the development, as identified in the approved respective Master Plan, shall be constructed prior to issuance of first occupancy. Exhibits shall show all frontage improvement requirements per the City adopted Master Plans. The project shall comply with the requirements as set forth in the Standard Conditions of Approval adopted by the City Council (Resolution No. 2017-027). The ultimate sizing and alignment of utilities (potable water, recycled water, sewer, and storm drain) will follow the most current approved Master Plan and/or hydraulic analysis approved by the City. 380

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-21
infrastructure

5.3 POTABLE WATER PLAN
Potable water will be provided by the City of Ontario. The City’s Potable Water Master Plan identifies new water facilities to serve the Ontario Ranch area, which will need to be constructed prior to or concurrent with onsite water improvements. Construction of the on-site and off-site Master Plan water service improvements shall be the responsibility of the developer.

Potable water improvements to be constructed in order to serve the CenterPark Specific Plan will consist of the following: a 16-inch water main on Campus Avenue, from Eucalyptus Avenue to the northerly boundary of CenterPark, a 12-inch water main on Bon View Avenue, from Eucalyptus Avenue to the northerly boundary of CenterPark, a 16-inch water main on Walker Avenue, from Eucalyptus Avenue to Ontario Ranch Road, a 16-inch water main on Ontario Ranch Road, from Walker Avenue to Campus Avenue, and a 30-inch master planned water line on Grove Avenue.

The Required Potable Water Infrastructure is subject to change based upon findings of City approved hydraulic studies, master plan updates, and project final designs. Any existing utilities, including IEUA mains, that do not meet minimum depths, standard alignment locations, and/or minimum horizontal and vertical separation requirements shall be subject to relocation/replacement by the developer(s) of the Specific Plan.

Other elements of the Phase 2 Water System are shown on Figure 5-14, Conceptual Potable Water System.

The elements shown north of Chino Avenue will be constructed by others. The balance of Phase 2 Water System will be completed as required by future development of Ontario Ranch. The Project will be required to participate in the future Phase 2 Water System improvements, as detailed in the development agreements with the City.

Phase 2 Water Improvements are required to support all development in the west side of Ontario Ranch including this Specific Plan area, therefore this project is required to participate financially in the Phase 2 Water Improvements. Depending on construction timing of this Specific Plan area in relation to the construction of the rest of the development in the west side of Ontario Ranch, completion of Phase 2 Water Improvements may be required prior to the completion of this Specific Plan area construction.

Master planned potable water main lines serving the development, as identified in the Specific Plan, shall be constructed prior to issuance of building permits.

For wells found within the Specific Plan area, see Section 3.7.

Within the CenterPark Specific Plan, a network of 8-inch and 12-inch water lines will be constructed to serve each neighborhood. All on-site intract improvements are required to have hydraulic studies to determine infrastructure improvements needed to support each area and shall be at the responsibility of the developer.

Any changes in land use not limited to units, density, or intensity, that are not previously accounted for, shall trigger a revised updated hydraulic study and any new findings of infrastructure improvements needed are required at the responsibility of the developer. The proposed on-site water system sizing is subject to the hydraulic criteria in the City’s Water and Sewer Design Guidelines and future hydraulic studies at the time of development. The conceptual public potable water system is illustrated on Exhibit 5-14, Conceptual Potable Water System.
381
5-22

GROVE AVE

CUCAMONGA AVE

PARCO AVE

WALKER AVE

VINEYARD AVE

CARPENTER AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE

BON VIEW AVE

SULTANA AVE

CAMPUS AVE

EUCLID AVE

MERRILL AVE

ONTARIO RACH RD

EUCALYPTUS AVE

SCHAEFER AVE

CHINO AVE

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

WALNUT ST
16”
30”
16”
30”
42” 12”
12”
16”
12”
12”
16” 16” 12”
16” 12”
16” 16” 16”
12”
12”
12”
12”
12”
24” 24”
12” 12” 12”
24”
18” 18”
24” 24”
24” 16” 16”
16” 16”
16” 16”
12”
12” 12” 12” 12”
16” 16” 12”
12”
16” 16”
42”

SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIRED POTABLE WATER MAIN

EXISTING POTABLE WATER MAIN (CITY OF ONTARIO)

ONTARIO RANCH MASTER PLAN IMPROVEMENTS
CONCEPTUAL PHASE 2 REQUIRED POTABLE WATER

INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
Phase 2 42-inch to two groundwater production wells 9 million gallon reservoir at Bon View Site. Phase 2 alignment shown is conceptual and not finalized.

CENTERPARK SPECIFIC PLAN
LEGEND
NOTES:
- Potable water main sizing is dependent on Fire Flow
Results and Fire Department’s requirements.

EXHIBIT 5-13 CONCEPTUAL POTABLE WATER PLAN
N
Phase 2 42-inch to two groundwater production wells 9 million gallon reservoir at Bon View Site. Phase 2 alignment shown is conceptual and not finalized. 382

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-23
infrastructure
EXHIBIT 5-14 CONCEPTUAL POTABLE WATER SYSTEM GROVE AVE CUCAMONGA AVE PARCO AVE

WALKER AVE

BON VIEW AVE

SULTANA AVE

CAMPUS AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

SCHAEFER AVE

ONTARIO RANCH RD
16”
30”
16”
30”
16”
12”
24” 16” 16”
16” 16”

SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIRED POTABLE WATER MAIN

EXISTING POTABLE WATER MAIN (CITY OF ONTARIO)

CENTERPARK SPECIFIC PLAN
LEGEND
NOTES:
- Potable water main sizing is dependent on Fire Flow
Results and Fire Department’s requirements.

N
383
5-24

5.4 RECYCLED WATER PLAN
Recycled water for the project site will be supplied by IEUA’s existing recycled water infrastructure as presented in the City’s Recycled Water Master Plan. The master planned 930 Pressure Zone 30-inch recycled water system exists in Bon View Avenue and Eucalyptus Avenue and Ontario Ranch Road and shall service the development of CenterPark.

The developer of CenterPark will construct all recycled water lines required to serve the project site. The off-site improvements include the construction of the 930 ft. Pressure Zone master planned recycled water system consisting of an optional 8-inch main in Campus Avenue from the northern to southern Specific Plan boundaries, if required to support development of parcels not fronting a master planned recycled water main, an 8-inch main in Bon View Avenue from the northern Specific Plan boundary to Ontario Ranch Road, an 8-inch main in Grove Avenue from the northern to southern Specific Plan boundaries, an 8-inch main in Walker Avenue from Ontario Ranch Road, and a 12-inch main in Ontario Ranch Road from Campus Avenue to Bon View Avenue. The off-site recycled water line locations are shown on Exhibit 5-15, Conceptual Recycled Water Plan.

The required Recycled Water Infrastructure is subject to change based upon findings of City approved hydraulic studies, master plan updates, and project final designs. Any existing utilities, including IEUA mains, that do not meet minimum depths, standard alignment locations, and/or minimum horizontal and vertical separation requirements shall be subject to relocation/replacement by the developer(s) of the Specific Plan.

Within the project site, 8-inch recycled water mains are proposed to serve the site. The CenterPark Specific Plan shall comply with City Ordinance 2689 and make use of recycled water for all approved uses, including but not limited to the irrigation of parks, street parkway landscaping, recreational trails, private pocket parks and any other HOA maintained common areas. The developer shall prepare and secure approval of an Engineering Report from the City of Ontario and State Department of Drinking Water Agency prior to the use of recycled water. Sizing of the on-site public recycled water system is subject to the hydraulic criteria in the City’s Water and Sewer Design Guidelines.

The developer of the Specific Plan is required to obtain approvals from IEUA to construct the reclaimed water lines to serve the project, including the regional connections outlined in the CenterPark Specific Plan and additional regional connections as required for the median within Ontario Ranch Road and to support development not fronting a City recycled water main.

The conceptual recycled water system is illustrated on Exhibit 5-16, Conceptual Recycled Water System. 384

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-25
infrastructure
This page intentionally left blank
385
5-26
EXHIBIT 5-15 CONCEPTUAL RECYCLED WATER PLAN GROVE AVE CUCAMONGA AVE PARCO AVE WALKER AVE VINEYARD AVE CARPENTER AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE

BON VIEW AVE

SULTANA AVE

CAMPUS AVE

EUCLID AVE

MERRILL AVE

ONTARIO RANCH RD

EUCALYPTUS AVE

SCHAEFER AVE

CHINO AVE

RIVERSIDE DRIVE
8”
8”
8”
8”
8”
8”
12”
20”
8”
8”
8”
8”
16”
8”
8”
20” 24”
8”
12”
12” 12”
8” 8”
8”
8”
12”
12”
12”
30”
8”
8”
8”
30” 48” 48” 48”
54”
60”
30” 30” 30”
30” 30”
54”
30”
20” 20” 24” 20”
16” 16”
8” 8” 8” 8” 8”
8”
8”
8”
8” 8” 12” 12” 12” 12”
12” 12”
12”
12”
12” 8” 12”
16” 16”
8” 8” 8” 12” 12” 12” 12”
24” 24” 30” 36”
12”
12”
8”
12”
8”

SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIRED RECYCLED WATER MAIN
(PER MASTER PLAN)

SPECIFIC PLAN OPTIONAL RECYCLED WATER MAIN (MAY BE REQUIRED IF

NEEDED TO SUPPORT DEVELOPMENT PARCELS NOT FRONTING A MASTER

PLANNED RECYCLED WATER MAIN)

EXISTING RECYCLED WATER MAIN (CITY OF ONTARIO)

EXISTING RECYCLED WATER MAIN (IEUA)
1050 PRESSURE ZONE

ONTARIO RANCH MASTER PLAN IMPROVEMENTS

PRESSURE REDUCING STATION

CENTERPARK SPECIFIC PLAN

PROPOSED POC (IEUA REGIONAL CONNECTION)
LEGEND
N
386

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-27
infrastructure

GROVE AVE

CUCAMONGA AVE

PARCO AVE

WALKER AVE

BON VIEW AVE

SULTANA AVE

CAMPUS AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

SCHAEFER AVE

ONTARIO RANCH RD
8”8”8
”
30”
8”
8”
8”
30”
30” 30”
12”
12”
12”

SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIRED RECYCLED WATER MAIN
(PER MASTER PLAN)

SPECIFIC PLAN OPTIONAL RECYCLED WATER MAIN (MAY BE REQUIRED IF

NEEDED TO SUPPORT DEVELOPMENT PARCELS NOT FRONTING A MASTER

PLANNED RECYCLED WATER MAIN)

EXISTING RECYCLED WATER MAIN (CITY OF ONTARIO)

EXISTING RECYCLED WATER MAIN (IEUA)

CENTERPARK SPECIFIC PLAN

PROPOSED POC (IEUA REGIONAL CONNECTION)
LEGEND
EXHIBIT 5-16 CONCEPTUAL RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM
N
387
5-28

5.5 SEWER PLAN
Sewer service for CenterPark will be provided by the City of Ontario. Off-site sewer improvements to serve the Specific Plan area will be implemented according to the most current version of the City’s Sewer Master Plan. The City’s Sewer Master Plan identifies sewer service to be provided by the existing sewer lines in Eucalyptus Avenue. The mains are in the intersections at Eucalyptus Avenue and Campus Avenue, Bon View Avenue, Grove Avenue and Walker Avenue. Any existing sewer mains not yet accepted by the City that are downstream of CenterPark are required at the responsibility of the developer to support the development of CenterPark.

Sewer Infrastructure improvements to be constructed to serve the CenterPark Specific Plan will consist of the following: 15-inch sewer main in Campus Avenue from the existing point of connection to the northern Specific Plan boundary, 18-inch in Bon View Avenue from the existing point of connection to the northern Specific Plan boundary, 21-inch in Grove Avenue from the existing point of connection to the northern Specific Plan boundary, and 21-inch in Walker Avenue from the existing point of connection to Ontario Ranch Road.

The required Sewer Infrastructure is subject to change based upon findings of City approved hydraulic studies, master plan updates, and project final designs. Any existing utilities, that do not meet minimum depths, standard alignment locations, and/or minimum horizontal and vertical separation requirements shall be subject to relocation/ replacement by the developer(s) of the Specific Plan.

Within CenterPark, a series of a minimum of 8-inch sewer mains are proposed to serve the residential development. Construction of the on-site and off-site sewer improvements shall be the responsibility of the developer. The proposed on-site public sewer system sizing is subject to the hydraulic criteria in the City’s Water and Sewer Design Guidelines.

All on-site intract improvements are required to have a SSAMP to determine infrastructure improvements needed to support each area and shall be at the responsibility of the developer. Any changes in land use not limited to units, density, or intensity, that are not previously accounted for or changes in sewer tributary boundaries shall trigger a revised updated SSAMP and any new findings of infrastructure improvements needed are required at the responsibility of the developer.

Master planned sewer main lines serving, surrounding and within the Specific Plan area, as identified in the adopted Sewer Master Plan shall be constructed prior to issuance building permits.

The conceptual sewer improvements are illustrated on Exhibit 5-17, Conceptual Sewer Plan, and on Exhibit 5-18, Conceptual Sewer System.
388

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-29
infrastructure
The off-site public sewer shall be designed to meet all applicable City standards and requirements and designed in such a way so that the proposed on-site private sewer improvements shall be designed to meet all applicable building and plumbing codes. CenterPark’s sewer tributary areas shall be determined in conformance with the latest City Sewer Master Plan while accommodating the off-site and on-site sewer standards, codes, and requirements, etc. If CenterPark’s sewer tributary areas need to be revised to allow the public or private sewer to meet applicable requirements, and a revised SSAMP supports the revised sewer tributary boundaries, as approved at the City’s discretion, then Exhibit 5-18 shall be revised to reflect CenterPark’s new sewer tributary boundaries.

Size will be determined during final design by hydraulic calculations through a Sewer Study or Sewer Sub-Area Master Plan (SSAMP) per City’s most current Sewer Master Plan. All intact sewers need to do a SSAMP.
389
5-30
EXHIBIT 5-17 CONCEPTUAL SEWER PLAN GROVE AVE CUCAMONGA AVE PARCO AVE WALKER AVE VINEYARD AVE

CARPENTER AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE

BON VIEW AVE

SULTANA AVE

CAMPUS AVE

EUCLID AVE

MERRILL AVE

KIMBALL AVE

ONTARIO RANCH RD

EUCALYPTUS AVE

SCHAEFER AVE

CHINO AVE

RIVERSIDE DRIVE
36” 36” 30”
20”
20”
15”21”
21”
18” 18”
16”

SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIRED SEWER MAIN
(PER MASTER PLAN)

SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIRED SEWER MAIN

EXISTING SEWER MAIN (CITY OF ONTARIO)

EXISTING CITY OF ONTARIO POC

CENTERPARK SPECIFIC PLAN
LEGEND
N
390

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-31
infrastructure

GROVE AVE

CUCAMONGA AVE

PARCO AVE

WALKER AVE

BON VIEW AVE

SULTANA AVE

CAMPUS AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

SCHAEFER AVE

ONTARIO RANCH RD
21”
15”
18”
21”
PA 1
PA 7
PA 2
PA 8 PA 9 PA 10 PA 11 PA 12 PA 13
PA 3 PA 4 PA 5 PA 6

SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIRED SEWER MAIN
(PER MASTER PLAN)

SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIRED SEWER MAIN

DIRECTION OF SEWER FLOWS WITHIN

SEWER TRIBUTARY AREA

CENTERPARK SPECIFIC PLAN
LEGEND
NOTES:
- Colors show tributary areas.

EXHIBIT 5-18 CONCEPTUAL SEWER SYSTEM
N
391
5-32

5.6 DRAINAGE
For the eastern portion of the proposed development, the CenterPark will construct a master planned storm drain line in Grove Avenue starting with a 96-inch line from the SCE easement north of Ontario Ranch Road to the intersection of Grove Avenue and Ontario Ranch Road, and a 108-inch storm drain line from the intersection of Grove Avenue and Ontario Ranch Road south to Eucalyptus Avenue and a 108-inch storm drain line in Walker Avenue from the intersection of Walker Avenue and Ontario Ranch Road south to Eucalyptus Avenue.

For the western portion of the proposed development, the CenterPark will construct a master planned storm drain line in Bon View Avenue starting with a 78-inch storm drain line from the SCE easment north of Ontario Ranch Road to the intersection of Bon View Avenue and Ontario Ranch Road, and a 96-inch storm drain line from the intersection of Bon View Avenue and Ontario Ranch Road south to Eucalyptus Avenue and a 60-inch storm drain line in Campus Avenue from the intersection of Campus Avenue and Ontario Ranch Road south to Eucalyptus Avenue.

The City’s Storm Drain Master Plan identifies storm drain improvements to serve the project site.

Completion of these Master Plan improvements will provide permanent storm drain service to the project. That portion of the Master Plan storm drain system that lies within the project site will be constructed as part of the development of the project. The size and location will be based on the Approved Master Plan of Drainage. The City of Ontario Master Plan storm drain improvements are illustrated on Exhibit 5-19, Conceptual Drainage Plan.

On-site storm drains will be sized and constructed to convey the on-site flows to the proposed Master Plan system. The size and location of proposed on-site storm drains may change based on final design. Interim detention basins are not proposed and are not allowed by the City. The developer is required to construct the ultimate storm drain improvements as identified on the Master Plan of Drainage. The Master Plan of Drainage for CenterPark is illustrated in Exhibit 5-20, Conceptual Storm Drain Improvements.

If at the time of construction, Line I in Euclid Avenue in the City of Chino has not been constructed, the developments tributary to this line will need to detain their runoff to 80% of the pre-development flows.

5.6.1 NPDES Compliance
The grading and drainage of the Specific Plan area shall be designed to incorporate the treatment of surface runoff, to retain and infiltrate the Design Capture Volumes (DCV) to comply with the requirements of the San Bernardino County NPDES Storm Water Program. These DCV may be directed to underground storage/infiltration chambers beneath parklets and paseos for infiltration into the ground where site soils do not provide adequate infiltration or other means to control drainage. 392

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-33
infrastructure
Low Impact Development (LID) Site Design Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be implemented in accordance with the selection criteria and other requirements outlined in the San Bernardino County NPDES Storm Water Program’s current Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as well as the City of Ontario’s Water Quality Management Plan requirements. Appropriate pre-treatment BMPs, such as baffle boxes, filters or surface forebays, etc. can be installed upstream of underground storage/infiltration chambers to collect sediments and minimize deposition of sediments in the infiltration zone. The NPDES Areawide Stormwater Program requires the preparation of project specific WQMP.

The objective of the WQMP for the project is to minimize the detrimental effects of urbanization on the beneficial uses of receiving waters, which includes effects caused by increased pollutants and changes in hydrology. These effects shall be minimized through the implementation of on-site and off-site Low Impact Development (LID) Site Design Best Management Practices (BMPs) that provide appropriate treatment of the DCV.

In addition, Non-Structural and Structural Source Control Best Management Practices (BMPs), shall also be implemented and documented in the project’s approved Water Quality Management Plan and Erosion Control with Grading Plan to reduce pollutant generation and transport from the project site.

Prior to the issuance of grading or construction permits for any parcel or area that disturbs 1 acre or more of land, within the CenterPark Specific Plan area, Erosion/Sediment Control Plans and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) shall be prepared. The SWPPP shall be prepared to comply with California State Water Resources Control Board’s (State Water Board) current “General Permit to Discharge Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity” and current “Area Wide Urban Storm Water Runoff” (Regional NPDES) Permits. The SWPPP shall identify and detail all appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be implemented or installed during construction of the project. In addition to the preparation of a construction SWPPP, any tract map or project that disturbs 1 acre or more of land area shall be required to obtain coverage under the State Water Board’s General Permit to Discharge Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity and show evidence of permit coverage to the City of Ontario, prior to the issuance of any grading or construction permits.

NPDES BMPs are not allowed within public right-of-way. All BMPs shall be installed on site and maintained by the HOA. All Priority Land Use (PLU) areas within the Specific Plan Area shall comply with the statewide Trash Provisions adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and Trash Requirements in the most current San Bernardino County Area-Wide MS4 Permit. 393
5-34
EXHIBIT 5-19 CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN GROVE AVE CUCAMONGA AVE PARCO AVE WALKER AVE VINEYARD AVE

CUCAMONGA CHANNEL

CARPENTER AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE

BON VIEW AVE

SULTANA AVE

CAMPUS AVE

EUCLID AVE

MERRILL AVE

ONTARIO RANCH RD

EUCALYPTUS AVE

SCHAEFER AVE

CHINO AVE

RIVERSIDE DRIVE
24” 24” 24”
24”
120”
120”
24” 24” 13’x8’ RCB 24” 24” 24”-30”
24”
60”
96” 78”
96” 108”
108”
LINE I

SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIRED STORM DRAIN MAIN
(PER MASTER PLAN) (DIF)

FUTURE ONTARIO RANCH MASTER PLAN IMPROVEMENTS

SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIRED STORM DRAIN MAIN
(PROJECT SPECIFIC)

EXISTING STORM DRAIN MAIN (CITY OF ONTARIO)
EXISTING 9.5’ X 9.5, RCB

DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY XVI (TRIBUTARY TO LINE I)

DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY XIII

DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY XII

CENTERPARK SPECIFIC PLAN
LEGEND
N
394

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-35
infrastructure

GROVE AVE

CUCAMONGA AVE

PARCO AVE

WALKER AVE

BON VIEW AVE

SULTANA AVE

CAMPUS AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

SCHAEFER AVE

ONTARIO RANCH RD
24” 24” 24”
24”
120”
24” 24” 24” 24”-30” 24” 13’x8’ RCB
24”
60”
96” 78”
96” 108”
108”

SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIRED STORM DRAIN MAIN
(PER MASTER PLAN) (DIF)

FUTURE ONTARIO RANCH MASTER PLAN IMPROVEMENTS

SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIRED STORM DRAIN MAIN
(PROJECT SPECIFIC)

EXISTING STORM DRAIN MAIN (CITY OF ONTARIO)

DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY XVI (TRIBUTARY TO LINE I)

DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY XIII

DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY XII

CENTERPARK SPECIFIC PLAN
LEGEND
EXHIBIT 5-20 CONCEPTUAL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
N
395
5-36

5.7 FIBER OPTICS
The proposed backbone street fiber optics (conduits, tracer wire, handholes and fiber) will be placed underground within a duct and structure system to be installed by the developer in a joint trench, as illustrated in Exhibit 5-21, Fiber Optic Master Plan. In-tract fiber and conduit shall be installed per the In-Tract Fiber Optic Design Guidelines. Maintenance of the installed system will be the responsibility of the City/Special District. Development of the project requires the installation of all fiber optic infrastructure and peripheral equipment necessary to service the project as a stand-alone development.

EXHIBIT 5-21 FIBER OPTIC MASTER PLAN GROVE AVE CUCAMONGA AVE PARCO AVE WALKER AVE VINEYARD AVE

CUCAMONGA CHANNEL

CARPENTER AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE

BON VIEW AVE

CAMPUS AVE

SULTANA AVE

EUCLID AVE

MERRILL AVE

ONTARIO RANCH RD

EUCALYPTUS AVE

SCHAEFER AVE

CHINO AVE

RIVERSIDE DRIVE
LEGEND
FIBER SIZE:

(2) 432
432
288
144
96 72
36 12
CenterPark Specific Plan N
396

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-37
infrastructure
EXHIBIT 5-22 FIBER OPTIC PLAN GROVE AVE CUCAMONGA AVE

PARCO AVE

WALKER AVE

BON VIEW AVE

SULTANA AVE

CAMPUS AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

SCHAEFER AVE

ONTARIO RANCH RD
LEGEND
FIBER SIZE:

432
96 72
36 CenterPark Specific Plan
N
397
5-38

5.8 GRADING CONCEPT
The project site generally slopes to the south at approximately 1.0% to 2.0%. The grading activities for CenterPark will generally consist of clearing and grubbing, demolition of existing structures and moving surface soils to construct building pads and streets. Where slope conditions are present, the project lot line shall be located at the top of a slope. Dwelling units and structures adjacent to the sloped areas should be sited to:
• Use the natural ridge as a backdrop for structures;
• Use landscape plant materials as a backdrop; and
• Use structures to maximize concealment of cut slope. If retaining walls are required, the following criteria shall be used:
- Exposed walls and fences facing roadways shall be no greater than 3 ft. retaining in height (9 ft. total wall), except as necessary for acoustical purposes as identified by the EIR or as required as a condition of approval.
- Where retaining walls or fences face roadways, they shall be built of decorative materials consistent with the wall theme of the neighborhood.

The Conceptual Grading Plan, as illustrated in Exhibit 5-23, Conceptual Grading Plan, provides a balance of cut/fills for the project. Grading plans for each tract within the project shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Ontario Building, Planning and Engineering Departments prior to the issuance of grading permits.

All grading plans and activities shall conform to the City’s grading ordinance and dust and erosion control requirements.

All landscape areas adjacent to streets, including medians, parkways and neighborhood edges, in the Specific Plan area, shall be finish graded, at a minimum of 1-inch to 2-inch below top-of-curb or sidewalk finish surface, for conservation of irrigation water and increased retention of rainwater runoff. To the maximum extent practicable, all landscaped areas within the project shall be graded as swales and designed to accept runoff water from impervious surfaces.
398

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-39
infrastructure
EXHIBIT 5-23 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
N

GROVE AVE

CUCAMONGA AVE

PARCO AVE

WALKER AVE

BON VIEW AVE

SULTANA AVE

CAMPUS AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

SCHAEFER AVE
ONTARIO RANCH RD MIN 1% GRADE
MIN 1% GRADE
MIN 1% GRADE
MIN 1% GRADE
MIN 1% GRADE
MIN 1% GRADE
MIN 1% GRADE

DIRECTION OF GRADE

CENTERPARK SPECIFIC PLAN
LEGEND
399
5-40

5.9 SCHOOLS
The CenterPark Specific Plan is within the school districts of the Chino Valley Unified School District.

Chino Valley Unified School District will serve the school age needs of grades K–12, for the Specific Plan area. The nearest Chino Valley Unified School District elementary school location, within the vicinity of the CenterPark Specific Plan, is Dickey Elementary School, located at 2840 Parco Avenue. The nearest Chino Valley Unified School District middle school location is Woodcrest Junior High School, located at 2725 South Campus Drive. The nearest Chino Valley Unified School District high school location is Chino High School, located at 5472 Park Place, in the city of Chino.

Chino Valley has one high school called Chino High School within the vicinity of the CenterPark Specific Plan located at 5472 Park Place, in the city of Chino.

Development of the project will generate an estimated student population as described in Table 5-1 below, based on the student generation numbers supplied by the City of Ontario. The project developer shall be required to pay school fees to mitigate school impacts as required by the State of California.

TABLE 5-1 STUDENT POPULATION
Grades K-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-12
Generation Factor 0.38/D.U. Generation Factor 0.22/D.U. Generation Factor 0.20/D.U.

0.38 x 4,293 = 1,631 0.22 x 4,293 = 945 0.20 x 4,293 = 859

5.10 NATURAL GAS
The Gas Company will provide natural gas to the project site and install gas mains to the project site as necessary.

5.11 ELECTRICITY
Southern California Edison Company (SCE) currently provides electrical service in the area. All new lines and all existing lines within the project less than 34.5 kV, shall be placed underground by the developer according to City of Ontario requirements and in accordance to City of Ontario undergrounding Ordinance. 400

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
5-41
infrastructure
Eucalyptus Ave
Campus Ave
Edison Ave/
Ontario Ranch Rd
Cucamonga Ave
Sultana Ave
Bon View Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Campus Ave
Bon View Ave
Cucamonga Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Baker Ave
Sultana Ave
Baker Ave
Edison Ave/
Ontario Ranch Rd

NEIGHBORHOOD PARK

BACKBONE PRIVATE STREET

PUBLIC STREET
12 KV UNDERGROUND TO BE ADDED12 KV OVERHEAD TO BE RELOCATED UNDERGROUND

POTENTIAL ACCESS POINT

FULL ACCESS

SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY
(CONCEPTUAL LOCATION)

ROUND-A-BOUT (CONCEPTUAL LOCATION)
Grand Park Ave Grand Park Ave
EXHIBIT 5-24 EXISTING ON-SITE FACILITIES
N
• 66 KV OVERHEAD TO BE RELOCATED
• 12 KV OVERHEAD TO BE RELOCATED UNDERGROUND
Eucalyptus Ave
Campus Ave
Bon View Ave
Cucamonga Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Baker Ave
Sultana Ave

SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY

FULL ACCESS

POTENTIAL ACCESS POINT
12 KV OVERHEAD TO BE RELOCATED UNDERGROUND
12 KV UNDERGROUND TO BE ADDED

PUBLIC STREET

BACKBONE PRIVATE STREET

NEIGHBORHOOD PARK (CONCEPTUAL LOCATION)

ROUND-A-BOUT (CONCEPTUAL LOCATION)
Grand Park Ave Grand Park Ave
401
5-42

5.12 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
CenterPark shall follow the City of Ontario’s latest “Solid Waste Department Refuse and Recycling Planning Manual”. City crews, through the Ontario Municipal Utilities Company, will provide solid waste collection and disposal service for the project. The project will participate in City sponsored recycle programs and diversion of special wastes such as tires and construction materials. Provisions for solid waste and recycling for the project are as follows:
• Residential – For curbside automated container service, developer shall comply with Municipal Code Section 6-3.308.9(a) and (d), Residential Receptacles, Placement. • Recycling Requirements – The developer shall comply with Municipal Code Article 6 Recycling Requirements for Special Business Activity, Section 6-3.601 Business Recycling Plan and Section 6-602 Construction and Demolition Recycling Plan.
• Site Improvement Plans shall follow the City of Ontario refuse collection standards. • Community trash enclosures (“dumpsters”) may be utilized, dependent upon housing product types/ orientation.
402

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
6-1
development regulations
SECTION 6: DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

6.1 INTRODUCTION
The provisions contained herein shall regulate design and development within the CenterPark Specific Plan.

The regulations contained herein provide for the development of all land use categories with development regulations established for residential uses, commercial uses, recreational facilities, and landscaping.

6.2 DEFINITION OF TERMS
The meaning and construction of words, phrases, titles and terms shall be the same as provided in the City of Ontario Development Code Article 2, “Definitions”, unless otherwise specifically provided for herein. The definitions of residential types shall be those defined in Section 4, Land Use Plan of the CenterPark Specific Plan within the discussion of each respective residential type. The definition of architectural and design terms shall be the same as those provided in the City of Ontario Development Code.

6.3 APPLICABILITY
The development regulations contained herein provide specific land use development standards for the project. Regulations address residential development and provide for general landscaping regulations.

Application of the following regulations is intended to encourage the most appropriate use of the land, ensure the highest quality of development and protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Whenever the provisions and development standards contained herein conflict with those contained in the City of Ontario Development Code, the provisions of the CenterPark Specific Plan shall take precedence. Where the CenterPark Specific Plan is silent, City of Ontario codes shall apply. All architectural and landscape improvements shall be consistent with the Design Guidelines contained in Section 7, Design Guidelines of the CenterPark Specific Plan. All architectural and landscape plans shall be submitted to the City for approval.

6.4 ADMINISTRATION
The CenterPark Specific Plan is adopted by ordinance and serves to implement the City of Ontario General Plan (TOP) as well as the zoning for the Specific Plan area. The CenterPark Specific Plan addresses general provisions, permitted uses, development standards and design guidelines. The CenterPark Specific Plan Development Regulations address general provisions, permitted uses and development standards for the community. The Specific Plan has been prepared in conformance with the Goals and Polices of the City’s Policy Plan as outlined in Section 9, General Plan Consistency. 403
6-2

6.5 GENERAL SITE DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA
The following general site development criteria shall apply to all development projects within CenterPark:

1. Gross Acres – Except as otherwise indicated, gross acres for all development areas are measured to the centerline of streets.

2. Adjusted Gross Acres – For the purpose of determining the proposed intensity of land uses, adjusted gross acres for all development areas are measured outside of the City’s ultimate street ROW and adjoining neighborhood edge as required by the City.

3. Building Modification – Building additions and/or alterations permitted by the CenterPark Specific Plan shall match the architectural style of the primary unit and shall be constructed of the same materials, details and colors as the primary unit.

4. Density Transfer – The CenterPark Specific Plan allocates a target number, type and density of units to each Planning Area as indicated in the Table 4-1, Land Use Summary, in Section 4 of the Specific Plan. Variations in the number and density of dwelling units within each residential Planning Area may occur at the time of final design of the Planning Area depending upon the residential type identified for development. Increases in the number of residential units, up to a maximum of fifteen percent (15%), are permitted among the residential Planning Areas within the project, subject to approval by the City of Ontario and upon agreement of each respective property owner or developer, provided the overall total number of units established for the CenterPark Specific Plan is not exceeded.

5. Grading – Development within the project site shall utilize grading techniques as approved by the City of Ontario. Grading concepts shall respond to the design guidelines included in the CenterPark Specific Plan which guide the development of land use toward the goal of providing for a livable community with streets and entries designed for walking and resident interaction.

6. Maximum Number of Dwelling Units – The maximum number of residential dwelling units permitted within the CenterPark Specific Plan is 4,293.

7. Solid Waste/Recycling - Development within the project shall comply with City requirements for the provision and placement of solid waste and recycling receptacles.

8. Technology – All homes and businesses shall accommodate modern technology for internet access, phone, fax, and television. Broadband fiber optics cable will be installed on all peripheral street per the approved Broadband Master Plan, as defined by the City Standards.

9. Utilities – All new and existing public utility distribution lines of 35.5 kV or less shall be subsurface throughout the CenterPark Specific Plan.
404

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
6-3
development regulations

10. Best Management Practices – Development of storm water runoff improvements within the CenterPark Specific Plan shall adhere to currently adopted Best Management Practices (BMP’s). The Site Design BMP’s may include, but not be limited to, creating landscape strips and landscaped setback areas that can be graded and depressed to retain and infiltrate irrigation water and runoff from smaller storm events, drain rooftops into rain gutters which would drain into an area of porous subgrade and depressing the park areas to provide storm water infiltration and water quality treatment. Common area landscaping and parks shall be designed to function as a series of shallow storm water treatment basins and infiltration zones for storm water runoff from surrounding areas wherever moderately well-draining soils exist.

6.6 PERMITTED USES AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

6.6.1 Permitted Uses
Any land use that is not listed in the CenterPark Specific Plan shall be considered a prohibited land use.

Land uses that are similar to one or more of the uses listed below but are not expressly stated as a Permitted or Conditionally Permitted use may be allowed subject to the approval of the Planning Director of the City of Ontario.

Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Land Uses within the Mixed-Use District and Residential Planning Areas of the CenterPark Specific Plan are described in Table 6-1, Allowable Land Uses.

Uses allowed within the Residential Planning Areas of the CenterPark Specific Plan include a variation of residential densities and uses consistent with the City of Ontario General Plan (TOP).

Permitted Uses are allowed by right and may be developed as the primary land use without additional discretionary approval subject to the development standards and guidelines outlined in the Specific Plan.

Conditionally Permitted Uses are allowed subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) from the City of Ontario.

Allowed Uses include the development of residential single-family detached dwelling units including conventional, traditional and cluster detached housing types, and single-family attached and multi-family dwelling units that include townhomes, duplexes, triplexes, apartments and other attached housing types.

Providing a variety of home types allows homeowners the opportunity to move up within the community as their lifestyles and needs change over time.

Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Land Uses within the Residential Planning Areas of the CenterPark Specific Plan are described in Table 6-1, Allowable Land Uses. Additional Land Uses within the Mixed-Use planning areas may be allowed subject to the approval by the Planning Director with an administrative minor Specific Plan amendment.
405
6-4
TABLE 6-1 ALLOWABLE LAND USES

LAND USE MEDIUM DENSITY

RESIDENTIAL

MIXED-USE

DISTRICT
“P” = Permitted Land Uses “C” = Conditionally Permitted Land Uses “A” = Administratively Permitted Uses “--” = Prohibited Land Uses

AGRICULTURAL USES
Temporary and Interim Agricultural Uses P P

MANUFACTURING
Artisan Crafts (Made by Hand) such as Glassworks, Jewelry and Pottery -- C

HEALTH CARE AND SOCIAL ASSISTANCE
Child Day Care Services (Commercial Facilities) -- P
Urgent Care -- P

COMMERCIAL USES

INFORMATION
Wireless Telecommunication Facilities -- C

EATING AND DRINKING PLACES AND FOOD SERVICES
Alcoholic Beverage Sales for Consumption on the Premises (includes all Retailer’s On-Sale Licenses issued by the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control) as an Ancillary Use
-- C
Bakery Retail -- P
Catering Services as an Ancillary Use -- C
Coffee House/Cafe -- P
Delicatessen/Cafeteria -- P
Ice Cream Parlor -- P
Restaurant, Family Full Service, Specialty and Fast Food -- P Restaurant
- Without Drive-Thru -- P
- With Drive-Thru -- C

PERSONAL SERVICES
Fitness and Recreational Sports Center
Health Clubs -- P
- Gross Floor Area less than 10,000 sq. ft. -- P
- Gross Floor Area 10,000 sq. ft. or more -- C

OFFICES
Administrative and Support Services -- P
General Offices -- P
Government Offices -- P
RETAIL
Banks/Credit Unions/ATMs -- P
Car Wash Full Service/Self-Service -- C
406

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
6-5
development regulations

LAND USE MEDIUM DENSITY

RESIDENTIAL

MIXED-USE

DISTRICT
Commercial Recreation/Virtual Sports -- C
Drug Store/Pharmacy as an Ancillary Use- no drive-thru -- C Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (Automobiles) as an Ancillary Use -- C Gas Station/Convenience Store (no Alcoholic Beverage Sales) -- C General Merchandise/Retail Store -- P
Grocery Store/Health and Specialty Food Store -- P
Hotels -- C
Medical Clinic/Healthcare Center/Urgent Care -- P
Places Of Worship C C

RESIDENTIAL USES
Single-Family Detached /Attached / Multi-Family Residences - Single-Family Dwellings P P
- Attached and Detached Condominiums P P
- Townhomes P P
- Stacked Flats P P
- Multiple Family Dwellings/Apartments P P
Residential Community Care Facility (6 or Less) P P
Home Occupation P P
Public School K-12 in accordance with the City Development Code P P Model Homes and temporary related Signage, Sales and Parking Facilities A A Senior Center C C
Senior Housing P C
Convalescent Facility C C
Live/Work Units C C
Places of Public Assembly (including Places of Worship) C C Residential Day Care Facilities serving up to 14 Children P P Private Recreation C C
Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Facilities -- C
Accessory Residential Structures
- Accessory Dwelling Units P P
- Accessory Residential Structures (Includes Guesthouses, Garages, Carports, Garden and Tool Sheds and Other Ancillary Buildings and Structures determined appropriate by the Planning Director)
P P
Animal Keeping
- 4 or fewer Pets P P
Employee (Farmworker) Housing
- 6 or fewer Employees -- C
407
6-6

LAND USE MEDIUM DENSITY

RESIDENTIAL

MIXED-USE

DISTRICT
Temporary Uses and Interim Uses
Christmas Tree, Pumpkin and Similar Lots -- A
Outdoor Displays -- A
Parking Lot Sales -- A
Street/Craft Fairs and Farmer’s Markets -- A
Temporary Structures -- A

SPECIALTY USES
Police Store Front/Sub Station/Fire Station/Emergency Services -- P Public Parks, Community Centers and Similar Facilities -- P

6.6.2 Residential Development Standards
A variety of home types, composed of detached and attached residential buildings, are permitted within CenterPark. This variety optimizes a range of choices and a mix of homes within the community. Home types range from single-family detached residences and detached condominiums, to 5-story apartment buildings.

Providing a variety of home types allows homeowners the opportunity to move up within the community as their lifestyles and needs change over time.

The following development standards for residential development establish the minimum criteria for the development within the CenterPark Specific Plan. The following exhibits depict the typical plotting for the anticipated detached and attached home types within the Specific Plan area.

Important to note: The following exhibits depict conceptual plotting only. The building footprints shown are not intended to represent actual floor plans or building configurations nor do they represent a comprehensive list of allowed home types.

The final product types within the Specific Plan area will be reviewed and determined at future TTM and Development Plan review
Additional residential designs that are consistent with the Specific Plan Development Standards and Design Guidelines may be approved by the City of Ontario Planning Director.

The development standards for residential development establish the minimum criteria within the CenterPark Specific Plan. Specific standards for each allowed building type are described in Table 6-2, Residential Development Standards.
408

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
6-7
development regulations

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS

DETACHED
SFD
Lot Dimensions (Minimum)
Net Lot Area 3,500 SF
Setback (Minimum) (1)
Front Yard 10 ft.

Covered Porch 5 ft.

Low Wall (Front) 2.5 ft.

Front Facing Garage 18 ft.

Garage - Side Entry Door 10 ft.

Corner Side Yard (2) 10 ft.

Interior Side Yard 5 ft.

Rear Yard to Living 10 ft.

Rear Yard to Garage 4 ft.

Building Separation (Minimum)
Living to Living 20 ft.

Side to Side (5) 8 ft.

Rear to Rear (Garage to Living) 14 ft.

Building Height (Maximum)
Building Height 28 ft. (2S)
35 ft. (3S)
Accessory Structure 16 ft.

Building Coverage (Maximum)
Building Coverage 60%
Open Space Coverage (Minimum)
Common Open Space Required N/A
Private Open Space/Unit 250 SF
Maximum Wall and Fence Heights (3) (4)
Walls and Fences 6 ft.

Walls/Fences w/Retaining 9 ft.
(1) Setback measured from property line unless otherwise noted. (2) Corner side setbacks are measured from ROW/back of sidewalk. (3) Wall heights shall be a maximum of 3 ft. in front yards setbacks to allow for vehicular minimum sight-line requirements.
(4) If all or any portion of a wall is used for retaining purposes, the maximum height shall be increased to 9 ft.
(5) Interior side yard setback may be reduced to 4 ft. in conditions where there is no side yard wall and the minimum usable side private yard area is 8 ft. min.

Neighborhood Street

LANDSCAPE LETTERED LOT
Neighborhood Street
NTS
EXHIBIT 6-1 CONVENTIONAL SFD

BUILDING

PRIVATE YARD
PATIO

PUBLIC VISIBLE LOT AREA
GARAGE

FRONT PORCH
EXHIBIT DEPICTS CONCEPTUAL PLOTTING ONLY.

NOT ACTUAL FLOOR PLAN/FOOTPRINTS.

DRIVEWAY
STREET

FRONT ENTRY LOCATION

PROPERTY LINE
6’ WALL

LOW WALL
LEGEND:

NOTE:
409
6-8
EXHIBIT 6-2 Z LOT/ZERO LOT SFD

BUILDING

PRIVATE YARD
PATIO

PUBLIC VISIBLE LOT AREA
GARAGE

FRONT PORCH
EXHIBIT DEPICTS CONCEPTUAL PLOTTING ONLY.

NOT ACTUAL FLOOR PLAN/FOOTPRINTS.

DRIVEWAY
STREET

FRONT ENTRY LOCATION

PROPERTY LINE
6’ WALL

LOW WALL
LEGEND:

NOTE:

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS

DETACHED
SFD
Lot Dimensions (Minimum)
Net Lot Area 2,500 SF
Setback (Minimum) (1)
Front Yard 10 ft.

Covered Porch 5 ft.

Low Wall (Front) 2.5 ft.

Front Facing Garage 18 ft.

Garage - Side Entry Door 10 ft.

Corner Side Yard (2) 10 ft.

Interior Side Yard N/A
Rear Yard to Living 10 ft.

Rear Yard to Garage 4 ft.

Building Separation (Minimum)
Living to Living 20 ft.

Side to Side (5) 8 ft.

Rear to Rear (Garage to Living) 14 ft.

Building Height (Maximum)
Building Height 28 ft. (2S)
35 ft. (3S)
Accessory Structure 16 ft.

Neighborhood Street

LANDSCAPE LETTERED LOT
Neighborhood Street
NTS
410

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
6-9
development regulations
EXHIBIT 6-3 LARGE CLUSTER SFD

BUILDING

PRIVATE YARD
PATIO

PUBLIC VISIBLE LOT AREA
GARAGE

FRONT PORCH
EXHIBIT DEPICTS CONCEPTUAL PLOTTING ONLY.

NOT ACTUAL FLOOR PLAN/FOOTPRINTS.

DRIVEWAY
STREET

FRONT ENTRY LOCATION

PROPERTY LINE
6’ WALL

LOW WALL
LEGEND:

NOTE:

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS

DETACHED
SFD
Lot Dimensions (Minimum)
Net Lot Area 2,500 SF
Setback (Minimum) (1)
Front Yard 10 ft.

Covered Porch 5 ft.

Low Wall (Front) 2.5 ft.

Front Facing Garage 18 ft.

Garage to Private Drive 10 ft.

Corner Side Yard (2) 10 ft.

Interior Side Yard 5 ft.

Rear Yard to Living 4 ft.

Rear Yard to Garage 4 ft.

Building Separation (Minimum)
Side to Side 10 ft.

Rear to Rear 8 ft.

Building Height (Maximum)
Building Height 28 ft. (2S)
35 ft. (3S)
Accessory Structure 16 ft.

Walls/Fences w/Retaining 9 ft.
(1) Setback measured from property line unless otherwise noted. (2) Corner side setbacks are measured from ROW/back of sidewalk, including a 5 ft. mi. lettered lot.
(3) Wall heights shall be a maximum of 3 ft. in front yards setbacks to allow for vehicular minimum sight-line requirements.
(4) If all or any portion of a wall is used for retaining purposes, the maximum height shall be increased to 9 ft.

Neighborhood Street
NTS
REAR
SIDE
FRONT
411
6-10
EXHIBIT 6-4 SMALL CLUSTER SFD

BUILDING

PRIVATE YARD
PATIO

PUBLIC VISIBLE LOT AREA
GARAGE

FRONT PORCH
EXHIBIT DEPICTS CONCEPTUAL PLOTTING ONLY.

NOT ACTUAL FLOOR PLAN/FOOTPRINTS.

DRIVEWAY
STREET

FRONT ENTRY LOCATION

PROPERTY LINE
6’ WALL

LOW WALL
LEGEND:

NOTE:

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS

DETACHED
SFD
Lot Dimensions (Minimum)
Net Lot Area 1,800 SF
Setback (Minimum) (1)
Front Yard 10 ft.

Covered Porch 5 ft.

Low Wall (Front) 2.5 ft.

Front Facing Garage 18 ft.

Garage to Private Drive 3 ft.

Corner Side Yard (2) 10 ft.

Interior Side Yard 5 ft.

Rear Yard to Living 4 ft.

Rear Yard to Garage 4 ft.

Building Separation (Minimum)
Side to Side 10 ft.

Rear to Rear 8 ft.

Building Height (Maximum)
Building Height 28 ft. (2S)
35 ft. (3S)
Accessory Structure 16 ft.

Neighborhood Street
NTS
REAR
SIDE
FRONT
412

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
6-11
development regulations
EXHIBIT 6-5 COURTYARD SFD

BUILDING

PRIVATE YARD
PATIO

PUBLIC VISIBLE LOT AREA
GARAGE

FRONT PORCH
EXHIBIT DEPICTS CONCEPTUAL PLOTTING ONLY.

NOT ACTUAL FLOOR PLAN/FOOTPRINTS.

DRIVEWAY
STREET

FRONT ENTRY LOCATION

PROPERTY LINE
6’ WALL

LOW WALL
LEGEND:

NOTE:

Neighborhood Street

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS

DETACHED
SFD
Lot Dimensions (Minimum)
Net Lot Area 1,800 SF
Setback (Minimum) (1)
Front Yard 10 ft.

Covered Porch 5 ft.

Low Wall (Front) 2.5 ft.

Front Facing Garage 18 ft.

Garage Door to Private Drive 3 ft.

Corner Side Yard 10 ft.

Interior Side Yard 10 ft.

Rear Yard to Living 8 ft.

Rear Yard to Garage 8 ft.

Building Separation (Minimum)
Side to Side 20 ft.

Interior Parking Setback to
Garage 1 ft.

Interior Parking Setback to
Living 5 ft.

Rear to Rear 16 ft.

Building Height (Maximum)
Building Height 28 ft. (2S)
35 ft. (3S)
Accessory Structure 16 ft.

Building Coverage (Maximum)
Building Coverage 65%
Open Space Coverage (Minimum)
Common Open Space Required N/A
Private Open Space/Unit 250 SF
Maximum Wall and Fence Heights (2) (3)
Walls and Fences 6 ft.

Walls/Fences w/Retaining 9 ft.
(1) Setback measured from property line unless otherwise noted. (2) Wall heights shall be a maximum of 3 ft. in front yards setbacks to allow for vehicular minimum sight-line requirements.
(3) If all or any portion of a wall is used for retaining purposes, the maximum height shall be increased to 9 ft.

NTS
REAR
SIDE
FRONT
413
6-12
EXHIBIT 6-6 COTTAGE SFD

BUILDING

PRIVATE YARD
PATIO

PUBLIC VISIBLE LOT AREA
GARAGE

FRONT PORCH
EXHIBIT DEPICTS CONCEPTUAL PLOTTING ONLY.

NOT ACTUAL FLOOR PLAN/FOOTPRINTS.

DRIVEWAY
STREET

FRONT ENTRY LOCATION

PROPERTY LINE
6’ WALL

LOW WALL
LEGEND:

NOTE:

Private Drive

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS

DETACHED
SFD
Lot Dimensions (Minimum)
Net Lot Area 6,000 SF
Setback (Minimum) (1)
Front Yard 10 ft.

Covered Porch 5 ft.

Low Wall (Front) 2.5 ft.

Front Facing Garage N/A
Garage Door to Private Drive 3 ft.

Corner Side Yard (2) 9 ft.

Interior Side Yard 4 ft.

Rear Yard to Living 3 ft.

Building Separation (Minimum)
Front to Front 20 ft.

Rear to Rear 30 ft.

Building Height (Maximum)
Building Height 28 ft. (2S)
35 ft. (3S)
Accessory Structure 16 ft.

NTS
REAR
SIDE
FRONT
414

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
6-13
development regulations
EXHIBIT 6-7 DUPLEX/TRIPLEX SFD

BUILDING

PRIVATE YARD
PATIO

PUBLIC VISIBLE LOT AREA
GARAGE

FRONT PORCH
EXHIBIT DEPICTS CONCEPTUAL PLOTTING ONLY.

NOT ACTUAL FLOOR PLAN/FOOTPRINTS.

DRIVEWAY
STREET

FRONT ENTRY LOCATION

PROPERTY LINE
6’ WALL

LOW WALL
LEGEND:

NOTE:

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS

ATTACHED
(2 STORY)

ATTACHED
(3 STORY)
Lot Dimensions (Minimum)
Net Lot Area N/A N/A
Setback (Minimum) (1)
Front Yard 10 ft. 12 ft.

Covered Porch 5 ft. 5 ft.

Low Wall 2.5 ft. 2.5 ft.

Front Facing Garage 3 ft. 3 ft.

Garage - Side Entry Door N/A N/A
Corner Side Yard (2) 10 ft. 12 ft.

Interior Side Yard 4 ft. 5 ft.

Rear Yard 10 ft. 10 ft.

Garage Door to Private
Drive 3 ft. 3 ft.

Building Separation (Minimum)
Side to Side 8 ft. 10 ft.

Side to Rear 14 ft. 15 ft.

Rear to Rear 20 ft. 20 ft.

Building Height (Maximum)
Building Height 28 ft. 38 ft.

Accessory Structure 16 ft. 16 ft.

Building Coverage (Maximum)
Building Coverage 65% 70%
Open Space Coverage (Minimum)
Common Open Space
Required 250 SF/DU 250 SF/DU
Private Open Space/Unit 150 SF (1ST FLR)
75 SF (UPPER FLRS)
75 SF
Maximum Wall and Fence Heights (3) (4)
Walls and Fences 6 ft. 6 ft.

Walls/Fences w/Retaining 9 ft. 9 ft.
(1) Setback measured from property line unless otherwise noted. (2) Corner side setbacks are measured from curb.
(3) Wall heights shall be a maximum of 3 ft. in front yards setbacks to allow for vehicular minimum sight-line requirements.
(4) If all or any portion of a wall is used for retaining purposes, the maximum height shall be increased to 9 ft.

Neighborhood Street
Neighborhood Street
DUPLEX

TRIPLEX
NTS
SIDE

REAR FRONT
NTS
SIDE

REAR FRONT
415
6-14
EXHIBIT 6-8 TOWNHOME/ROWTOWN SFA

BUILDING

PRIVATE YARD
PATIO

PUBLIC VISIBLE LOT AREA
GARAGE

FRONT PORCH
EXHIBIT DEPICTS CONCEPTUAL PLOTTING ONLY.

NOT ACTUAL FLOOR PLAN/FOOTPRINTS.

DRIVEWAY
STREET

FRONT ENTRY LOCATION

PROPERTY LINE
6’ WALL

LOW WALL
LEGEND:

NOTE:

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS

ATTACHED
(2 STORY)

ATTACHED
(3 STORY)
Lot Dimensions (Minimum)
Net Lot Area N/A N/A
Setback (Minimum) (1)
Front Yard 10 ft. 12 ft.

Covered Porch 5 ft. 5 ft.

Low Wall 2.5 ft. 2.5 ft.

Front Facing Garage 3 ft. 3 ft.

Garage - Side Entry Door N/A N/A
Corner Side Yard (2) 10 ft. 12 ft.

Interior Side Yard N/A N/A
Rear Yard 3 ft. 3 ft.

Garage Door to Private
Drive 3 ft. 3 ft.

Building Separation (Minimum)
Front to Front (includes
porch) (3) 20 ft. 20 ft.

Front to Side 15 ft. 16 ft.

Side to Side 10 ft. 12 ft.

Side to Rear N/A N/A
Rear to Rear 30 ft. 30 ft.

Building Height (Maximum)
Building Height 28 ft. 38 ft.

Accessory Structure 16 ft. 16 ft.

Walls/Fences w/Retaining 9 ft. 9 ft.
(1) Setback measured from property line unless otherwise noted. (2) Corner side setbacks are measured from curb.
(3) Fronts door entries facing onto each other shall have a minimum setback of 24 ft. for 2 story buildings and 30 ft. for 3 story building elements. (4) Wall heights shall be a maximum of 3 ft. in front yards setbacks to allow for vehicular minimum sight-line requirements.
(5) If all or any portion of a wall is used for retaining purposes, the maximum height shall be increased to 9 ft.

NTS
SIDE

REAR FRONT
Neighborhood Street
416

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
6-15
development regulations
EXHIBIT 6-9 AUTOCOURT SFA

BUILDING

PRIVATE YARD
PATIO

PUBLIC VISIBLE LOT AREA
GARAGE

FRONT PORCH
EXHIBIT DEPICTS CONCEPTUAL PLOTTING ONLY.

NOT ACTUAL FLOOR PLAN/FOOTPRINTS.

DRIVEWAY
STREET

FRONT ENTRY LOCATION

PROPERTY LINE
6’ WALL

LOW WALL
LEGEND:

NOTE:

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS

ATTACHED
(2 STORY)

ATTACHED
(3 STORY)
Lot Dimensions (Minimum)
Net Lot Area N/A N/A
Setback (Minimum) (1)
Front Yard 10 ft. 12 ft.

Covered Porch 5 ft. 5 ft.

Low Wall 2.5 ft. 2.5 ft.

Front Facing Garage 18 ft. 18 ft.

Garage - Side Entry Door 10 ft. 10 ft.

Corner Side Yard (2) 10 ft. 12 ft.

Interior Side Yard 10 ft. 12 ft.

Rear Yard 10 ft. 10 ft.

Rear Yard to Garage N/A N/A
Building Separation (Minimum)
Front to Front (includes
porch) N/A N/A
Front to Side N/A N/A
Side to Side (3) 20 ft. 24 ft.

Side to Rear 20 ft. 25 ft.

Rear to Rear 20 ft. 25 ft.

Building Height (Maximum)
Building Height 28 ft. 38 ft.

Accessory Structure 16 ft. 16 ft.

Private Drive
NTS
REAR
SIDE
FRONT
417
6-16
EXHIBIT 6-10 COURTYARD TOWNHOMES

BUILDING

PRIVATE YARD
PATIO

PUBLIC VISIBLE LOT AREA
GARAGE

FRONT PORCH
EXHIBIT DEPICTS CONCEPTUAL PLOTTING ONLY.

NOT ACTUAL FLOOR PLAN/FOOTPRINTS.

DRIVEWAY
STREET

FRONT ENTRY LOCATION

PROPERTY LINE
6’ WALL

LOW WALL
LEGEND:

NOTE:

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS

ATTACHED
(3 STORY)
Lot Dimensions (Minimum)
Net Lot Area N/A
Setback (Minimum) (1)
Front Yard 12 ft.

Covered Porch 5 ft.

Low Wall 2.5 ft.

Front Facing Garage N/A
Garage - Side Entry Door 10 ft.

Corner Side Yard (2) 12 ft.

Interior Side Yard 6 ft.

Rear Yard 3 ft.

Rear Yard to Garage 3 ft.

Building Separation (Minimum)
Front to Front (includes porch) (3) N/A
Front to Side N/A
Side to Side 15 ft.

Side to Rear N/A
Rear to Rear 30 ft.

Building Height (Maximum)
Building Height 38 ft.

Accessory Structure 16 ft.

Building Coverage (Maximum)
Building Coverage 70%
Open Space Coverage (Minimum)
Common Open Space Required 250 SF/DU
Private Open Space/Unit 75 SF
Maximum Wall and Fence Heights (3) (4)
Walls and Fences 6 ft.

Walls/Fences w/Retaining 9 ft.
(1) Setback measured from property line unless otherwise noted. (2) Corner side setbacks are measured from curb.
(3) Wall heights shall be a maximum of 3 ft. in front yards setbacks to allow for vehicular minimum sight-line requirements.
(4) If all or any portion of a wall is used for retaining purposes, the maximum height shall be increased to 9 ft.
(5) Porch structure minimum depth and width and clear space size.

Neighborhood Street
Neighborhood Street
NTS

FRONT REAR REAR
SIDE
FRONT
418

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
6-17
development regulations
EXHIBIT 6-11 3 STORY PODIUM SFA

BUILDING

PRIVATE YARD
PATIO

PUBLIC VISIBLE LOT AREA
GARAGE

FRONT PORCH
EXHIBIT DEPICTS CONCEPTUAL PLOTTING ONLY.

NOT ACTUAL FLOOR PLAN/FOOTPRINTS.

DRIVEWAY
STREET

FRONT ENTRY LOCATION

PROPERTY LINE
6’ WALL

LOW WALL
LEGEND:

NOTE:

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS

ATTACHED
(3 STORY)
Lot Dimensions (Minimum)
Net Lot Area N/A
Setback (Minimum) (1)
Front Yard 12 ft.

Covered Porch 5 ft.

Low Wall 2.5 ft.

Front Facing Garage N/A
Garage - Side Entry Door N/A
Corner Side Yard (2) 12 ft.

Interior Side Yard 6 ft.

Rear Yard N/A
Rear Yard to Garage N/A
Building Separation (Minimum)
Front to Front (includes porch) (3) 24 ft. / 30 ft.

Front to Side 15 ft.

Side to Side 15 ft.

Side to Rear N/A
Rear to Rear N/A
Building Height (Maximum)
Building Height 38 ft.

Accessory Structure 16 ft.

Walls/Fences w/Retaining 9 ft.
(1) Setback measured from property line unless otherwise noted. (2) Corner side setbacks are measured from curb.
(3) Fronts door entries facing onto each other shall have a minimum setback of 24 ft. for 2 story buildings and 30 ft. for 3 story building elements.
(4) Wall heights shall be a maximum of 3 ft. in front yards setbacks to allow for vehicular minimum sight-line requirements.
(5) If all or any portion of a wall is used for retaining purposes, the maximum height shall be increased to 9 ft.

Neighborhood Street
NTS

FRONT FRONT
SIDE
SIDE
419
6-18
EXHIBIT 6-12 TUCK UNDER APARTMENT/CONDOMINIUM

BUILDING

PRIVATE YARD
PATIO

PUBLIC VISIBLE LOT AREA
GARAGE

FRONT PORCH
EXHIBIT DEPICTS CONCEPTUAL PLOTTING ONLY.

NOT ACTUAL FLOOR PLAN/FOOTPRINTS.

DRIVEWAY
STREET

FRONT ENTRY LOCATION

PROPERTY LINE
6’ WALL

LOW WALL
LEGEND:

NOTE:

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS

ATTACHED
(3 STORY)
Lot Dimensions (Minimum)
Net Lot Area N/A
Setback (Minimum) (1)
Front Yard 12 ft.

Covered Porch 5 ft.

Low Wall 2.5 ft.

Front Facing Garage N/A
Garage - Side Entry Door N/A
Corner Side Yard (2) 10 ft.

Interior Side Yard 6 ft.

Rear Yard 3 ft.

Rear Yard to Garage 3 ft.

Building Separation (Minimum)
Front to Front (includes porch) (3) 24 ft. / 30 ft.

Front to Side 15 ft.

Side to Side 20 ft.

Side to Rear N/A
Rear to Rear 30 ft.

Building Height (Maximum)
Building Height 38 ft.

Accessory Structure 16 ft.

Private Drive
Private Drive
Private Drive

FRONT REAR
SIDE
SIDE
NTS
420

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
6-19
development regulations
EXHIBIT 6-13 MOTORCOURT APARTMENT/CONDOMINIUM

BUILDING

PRIVATE YARD
PATIO

PUBLIC VISIBLE LOT AREA
GARAGE

FRONT PORCH
EXHIBIT DEPICTS CONCEPTUAL PLOTTING ONLY.

NOT ACTUAL FLOOR PLAN/FOOTPRINTS.

DRIVEWAY
STREET

FRONT ENTRY LOCATION

PROPERTY LINE
6’ WALL

LOW WALL
LEGEND:

NOTE:

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS

ATTACHED
(3 STORY)
Lot Dimensions (Minimum)
Net Lot Area N/A
Setback (Minimum) (1)
Front Yard 12 ft.

Covered Porch 5 ft.

Low Wall 2.5 ft.

Front Facing Garage 3 ft.

Garage - Side Entry Door N/A
Corner Side Yard (2) 10 ft.

Interior Side Yard 6 ft.

Rear Yard 10 ft.

Rear Yard to Garage N/A
Building Separation (Minimum)
Front to Front (includes porch) (3) N/A
Front to Side N/A
Side to Side 15 ft.

Side to Rear (3) 20 ft.

Rear to Rear (3) 30 ft.

Building Height (Maximum)
Building Height 38 ft.

Accessory Structure 16 ft.

Walls/Fences w/Retaining 9 ft.
(1) Setback measured from property line unless otherwise noted. (2) Corner side setbacks are measured from curb.
(3) Fronts door entries facing onto each other shall have a minimum setback of 24 ft. for 2 story buildings and 30 ft. for 3 story building elements.
(4) Wall heights shall be a maximum of 3 ft. in front yards setbacks to allow for vehicular minimum sight-line requirements.
(5) Porch structure minimum depth and width and clear space size.

Neighborhood Street
Neighborhood Street
NTS
REAR
SIDE
FRONT
421
6-20
EXHIBIT 6-14 WRAP MULTI-FAMILY

BUILDING

PRIVATE YARD
PATIO

PUBLIC VISIBLE LOT AREA
GARAGE

FRONT PORCH
EXHIBIT DEPICTS CONCEPTUAL PLOTTING ONLY.

NOT ACTUAL FLOOR PLAN/FOOTPRINTS.

DRIVEWAY
STREET

FRONT ENTRY LOCATION

PROPERTY LINE
6’ WALL

LOW WALL
LEGEND:

NOTE:

Neighborhood Street
Neighborhood Street

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS

ATTACHED
(+3 STORY)
Lot Dimensions (Minimum)
Net Lot Area N/A
Setback (Minimum) (1)
Front Yard 15 ft.

Covered Porch 5 ft.

Low Wall 2.5 ft.

Front Facing Garage N/A
Garage - Side Entry Door N/A
Corner Side Yard (2) 15 ft.

Interior Side Yard 15 ft.

Rear Yard 15 ft.

Rear Yard to Garage N/A
Building Separation (Minimum)
Front to Front (includes porch)
20 ft. (2 story)
30 ft. (3 story)
40 ft. (4+ story)
Front to Side N/A
Side to Side 30 ft.

Side to Rear 30 ft.

Rear to Rear 30 ft.

Building Height (Maximum)
Building Height 58 ft.

Accessory Structure 16 ft.

Building Coverage (Maximum)
Building Coverage 75%
Open Space Coverage (Minimum)
Common Open Space Required 250 SF/DU
Private Open Space/Unit 75 SF
Maximum Wall and Fence Heights (4) (5)
Walls and Fences 6 ft.

NTS
REAR
SIDE
FRONT
422

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
6-21
development regulations
EXHIBIT 6-15 PODIUM MULTI-FAMILY

BUILDING

PRIVATE YARD
PATIO

PUBLIC VISIBLE LOT AREA
GARAGE

FRONT PORCH
EXHIBIT DEPICTS CONCEPTUAL PLOTTING ONLY.

NOT ACTUAL FLOOR PLAN/FOOTPRINTS.

DRIVEWAY
STREET

FRONT ENTRY LOCATION

PROPERTY LINE
6’ WALL

LOW WALL
LEGEND:

NOTE:

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS

ATTACHED
(+3 STORY)
Lot Dimensions (Minimum)
Net Lot Area N/A
Setback (Minimum) (1)
Front Yard 15 ft.

Covered Porch 3 ft.

Low Wall 2.5 ft.

Front Facing Garage N/A
Garage - Side Entry Door N/A
Corner Side Yard (2) 15 ft.

Interior Side Yard 15 ft.

Rear Yard 15 ft.

Rear Yard to Garage 3 ft.

Building Separation (Minimum)
Front to Front (includes porch)
20 ft. (2 story)
30 ft. (3 story)
40 ft. (4+ story)
Front to Side N/A
Side to Side 30 ft.

Side to Rear 30 ft.

Rear to Rear 30 ft.

Building Height (Maximum)
Building Height 58 ft.

Accessory Structure 16 ft.

Neighborhood Street
Neighborhood Street
NTS
REAR
SIDE
FRONT
423
6-22

6.6.3 Use and Benefit Easements
In order to optimize usable yard area, decrease the visual impact of the garage from the street or otherwise provide a better quality of life, some single-family detached home types may utilize “use and benefit easements”.

Higher density SFD neighborhoods are typically developed either as detached condominiums or as fee simple lots. The easements are an alternative to conventional “zero lot line” programs. Architecturally, it allows high windows on the non-active side of the house to allow natural light on three sides of the floor plan. Zero lot line programs generally have a large blank wall along one side yard.

The “use and benefit easements” (See Exhibit 6-16, Use and Benefit Easements) shall be recorded on the subject property’s deed and shall be described in the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of the respective homeowners association.

EXHIBIT 6-16 USE AND BENEFIT EASEMENTS
424

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
6-23
development regulations

6.7 MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Uses allowed within the Mixed-Use Planning Areas of the CenterPark Specific Plan include a variety of retail, office and higher density residential uses consistent with the City of Ontario General Plan (TOP).

Conditionally Permitted Uses are allowed subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) from the City of Ontario.

TABLE 6-2 MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

DEVELOPMENT STANDARD RETAIL COMMERCIAL

AND OFFICE
Minimum Lot Size/Area 8,000 sq ft
Floor Area Ratio
(Calculated based on gross site average)
Maximum Commercial 0.3 FAR
Maximum Office 0.7 FAR
Building Height (maximum) (5)
Structures 45 ft
Architectural Projections (including towers,
focal elements, cupulas, etc.) 55 ft
Minimum Landscape Coverage 10%, all setback from right-of-way areas shall be landscaped
Building Setbacks (minimum)
From Ontario Ranch Road Right-Of-Way 35 ft (4)
From Grove Avenue Right-Of-Way 20 ft
From Private or Local Street 10 ft (2)
From residential structures 25 ft
From SCE Property Line/Easements 0 ft
Parking Setbacks (minimum) (1) (3)
From Ontario Ranch Road Right-Of-Way 35 ft
From Grove Avenue Right-Of-Way 20 ft
From Private or Local Street 10 ft
From adjacent property 5 ft
From SCE Property Line/Easements 0 ft
Footnotes:

1. Per the City of Ontario Development Code. Commercial parking standards still apply.

2. Refer to Section 7, Landscape Design Guidelines for further setback/design requirements.

3. Parking stalls perpendicular to street shall be screened by landscaping, berms, or decorative walls that match architectural style of nearest development. Landscape screening shall mature to a minimum height of 36 inches (to screen car grilles).

4. Buildings shall be set back to the Neighborhood Edge or to the given setback from R.O.W., whichever is more restrictive.

Where a Neighborhood Edge condition does not exist, setbacks from R.O.W. shall govern.

5.Maximum building heights shall comply with the requirements of Chino Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan ("CNO ALUCP").
425
6-24

6.8 RESIDENTIAL PARKING STANDARDS

6.8.1 Off-Street Parking Requirements
Off-street parking spaces shall be provided pursuant to Table 6-3, Off-Street Parking Requirements. If more than one land use is established on a lot or project site, the number of off-street parking spaces required shall be equal to the sum of the requirements prescribed for each individual land use.

The Omnitrans Bus Rapid Transit Corridor (BRT Corridor) is planned to be implemented along Ontario Ranch Road as a part of future development. The BRT Corridor is expected to provide convenient and accessible public transportation for future residents and visitors of CenterPark; and hence the potential for residents and visitors to have a reduced need for private transportation requirements. In anticipation of the future implementation of the high speed public transport route, developments which exceed the minimum density of 20 DU/Acre, located within 330 ft. of the BRT corridor along Ontario Ranch Road may be allowed to have reduced parking requirements. Refer to the Alternative Multi-Family Standards in the following Table 6-3, Off-Street Parking Requirements.

Minimum Standards
The parking requirements of Table 6-3, Off-Street Parking Requirements are expressed as minimum standards, which should be met and not exceeded. Nevertheless, if additional parking is essential to a project, the minimum parking standard may be exceeded as follows:

1. Residential Uses—Additional Parking Allowed Without Limit. For residential uses, there is no maximum limit as to the number of parking spaces that may be provided. As such, any additional parking may be provided as a matter of right.

2. Attached Residential Uses—The parking requirements for Attached Single Family Uses, including Multi-Family Residential Uses may be met using the City of Ontario Parking Standards for minimum parking or alternative minimum parking standards as defined in Table 6-3.

3. Residential development with a minimum density of 11 DU/AC (Net) including multi-family development, located within 330 ft. of Ontario Ranch Road may use the alternative parking standards as identified in Table 6-3.

4. Nonresidential Uses—Limited Additional Parking Allowed. Additional parking spaces provided in excess of the number required pursuant to Table 6-3 of this Section may be provided for nonresidential uses or the nonresidential portions of mixed-use projects, as follows:
a. Parking spaces may be provided up to a maximum of 10 percent above the required number as a matter of right, without any discretionary review by the City. b. Parking spaces provided in excess of 10 percent above the required number shall be allowed only upon approval by the Planning Commission, based upon proven need.

Gross Floor Area (GFA)
References to spaces per sq. ft. are to be computed based upon GFA, unless otherwise specified, and includes allocations of shared restrooms, and circulation and storage areas, and other similar common facilities. 426

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
6-25
development regulations
Rounding of Off-Street Parking Calculations
If a fractional number results from calculations performed in compliance with this Section, one parking space shall be required for a fractional unit of 0.50 or greater, and no space shall be required for a fractional unit of less than 0.50.

TABLE 6-3 OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS

OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS

REQUIREMENTS NOTES

CONVENTIONAL

SINGLE-FAMILY
• 2 spaces per dwelling within a garage

SINGLE-FAMILY

DETACHED
• 2 resident spaces per dwelling
• 1 guest/visitor space per 4 dwellings
• Guest parking spaces may be
provided on-street, immediately
adjacent to the development
boundary, if available.
• A minimum of 3 guest spaces
shall be provided regardless of the
number of dwellings proposed.

ATTACHED

SINGLE-FAMILY

ONTARIO MULTI-FAMILY STANDARDS
• Studio: 1.5 spaces per dwelling
• 1-Bedroom: 1.75 spaces per dwelling
• 2-Bedrooms: 2.0 spaces per dwelling
• 3+-Bedrooms: 2.5 spaces per dwelling
• Under 100 dwellings: 1 guest/visitor space per 5 dwellings • Over 100 dwellings: 1 guest/visitor space per 6 dwellings • Guest parking spaces may be
provided on-street, immediately
adjacent to the development
boundary, if available.
• A minimum of 3 guest spaces
shall be provided regardless of the
number of dwellings proposed.
• Development may utilize either
standard to to fulfill the minimum
parking requirements

ALTERNATIVE MULTI-FAMILY STANDARDS
• 1-Bedroom: 1.0 spaces per dwelling
• 2-Bedrooms: 2.0 spaces per dwelling
• 3+-Bedrooms: 3.0 spaces per dwelling
• 1 guest/visitor space per 4 dwellings

MIXED-USE

RESIDENTIAL

ONTARIO STANDARD
• Studio: 1.5 spaces per dwelling
• 1-Bedroom: 1.75 spaces per dwelling
• 2-Bedrooms: 2.0 spaces per dwelling
• 3+-Bedrooms: 2.5 spaces per dwelling
• Under 100 dwellings: 1 guest/visitor space per 5 dwellings • Over 100 dwellings: 1 guest/visitor space per 6 dwellings • Guest parking spaces may be
provided on-street, immediately
adjacent to the development
boundary, if available.
• A minimum of 3 guest spaces
shall be provided regardless of the
number of dwellings proposed.
• Development may utilize either
standard to fulfill the minimum
parking requirements

ALTERNATIVE MULTI-FAMILY STANDARDS
• 1-Bedroom: 1.0 spaces per dwelling
• 2-Bedrooms: 2.0 spaces per dwelling
• 3+-Bedrooms: 3.0 spaces per dwelling
• 1 guest/visitor space per 4 dwellings

MIXED-USE
NONRESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
• 4 spaces per 1,000 SF (0.004/SF) of GFA
OFFICE
• 4 spaces per 1,000 SF (0.004/SF) of GFA

BRT CORRIDOR
• Studio: 1.0 spaces per dwelling
• 1-Bedroom: 1.0 spaces per dwelling
• 2-Bedrooms: 1.75 spaces per dwelling
• 3+-Bedrooms: 2.0 spaces per dwelling
• Under 100 dwellings: 1 guest/visitor space per 5 dwellings • Over 100 dwellings: 1 guest/visitor space per 6 dwellings • A minimum of 3 guest spaces
shall be provided regardless of the
number of dwellings proposed.
• Developments located within 330
ft. of the BRT Corridor may utilize
the following standards to fulfill the
minimum parking requirements
Note: Where proposed SP parking standards are not outlined, the City of Ontario parking standards will apply. Allowable uses within the Mixed-Use district are indicated in Table 6-1 and would be required to meet City parking standards. All parking spaces to be within an enclosed garage with a minimum clear dimension of 20 ft. x 20 ft. for two spaces and 10 ft. x 20 ft. for single or tandem spaces. 427
6-26

6.9 OPEN SPACE/AMENITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The development standards for open space and amenities establish the minimum criteria within the CenterPark Specific Plan. Specific standards for detached and attached residential development are described in Table 6-4, Open Space/Amenities Standards. The Amenity Standards shall be followed as prescribed in the City’s Development Code.

TABLE 6-4 OPEN SPACE/AMENITIES STANDARDS

MINIMUM ON SITE PARK REQUIREMENTS
2 AC PARKLAND / 1,000 PEOPLE
Single-Family Residential 3.806 PPH
Multi-Family Residential 3.373 PPH

REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AMENITIES
<75 76-100 101-150 151-200 201-250 251-300 301+
Major Amenity TBD (*) 1 1 2 2 3 TBD (**)
Minor Amenity TBD (*) 1 2 2 3 3 TBD (**)
* Amenities to be determined on a case-by-case basis during the entitlement process for the project. ** Amenities to be determined on a case-by-case basis during the entitlement process for the project, with the idea being to allow flexibility in the amenity package to the benefit of the residents.

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
• 2 acres of parkland per 1,000 people (3.806 PPU for SFD, 3.373 PPU for multi-family) • Community Pool (including restrooms/showers) required at >150 units • Clubhouse/amenity center per below at >200 units

MAJOR AMENITIES
• Open lawn amphitheater (min. 100 ft. x 150 ft. or equivalent) OR Active lawn area (min. 150 ft. x 150 ft. or equivalent) • Clubhouse/amenity center with minimum 3 amenities per list below (Larger clubhouses with more amenities - 2 additional amenities within the clubhouse counts towards a minor amenity):
- Multi-purpose room
- Kitchen facility
- Fitness Center
- Child-friendly amenity (Indoor play area, game room or educational center) - Movie room
- Business Center/Co-working spaces
- Library/Study room
- Beverage area or Common meeting space
• Community pool min. 25 ft. x 60 ft. (1,500 sq. ft.) or equivalent; and associated restroom/shower building (Each additional 1,500 sq. ft. added to the size of the pool shall be treated as another major amenity):
- Additional swimming pools (e.g. Adult only, Children pool, Lap pool) - Splash Pad or water play fountain
- Tennis/Pickleball Courts (1 tennis court = 1 amenity, 2 pickleball courts = 1 amenity) 428

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
6-27
development regulations
- Childcare facilities
- Dog Park
- SCE Utility Corridor Trail
- Private parkland/pocket park in excess of 2.5 AC/1,000 People (Public parks count towards Quimby, not private/pocket parks) - Other major amenities requiring significant investment and of appropriate size to serve the project residents, as determined by the City

MINOR AMENITIES
- Open lawn amphitheater (min. 100 ft x 150 ft or equivalent) OR Active lawn area (min. 150 ft. x 150 ft. or equivalent) - Tot Lots for ages 2 to 5 and/or play areas/equipment for ages 5 to 12 - Spa or Saunas
- Picnic tables and barbecue areas
- Cabanas and shade structures
- Basketball courts
- Volleyball courts
- Community gardens
- Internal community trail(s) 13 ft. minimum with a minimum distance of 1/4 mile - Outdoor fitness stations
- Pocket Parks
- Firepit
- Other similar appropriate amenities to serve the project residents, as determined by the City 429
6-28

6.10 LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

6.10.1 General Provisions

1. All landscape and irrigation plans for streetscapes, entry monuments and common open space improvements within CenterPark shall conform to the Design Guidelines and Regulations set forth in this section of the Specific Plan, shall be subject to the review and approval by the City of Ontario.

The form and content of landscape plans for streets, parks and other common areas shall conform to the requirements of the City of Ontario.

2. The landscape streetscape improvements for the Master Plan streets within the Specific Plan shall establish a landscape theme reminiscent of the regional landscape character of the surrounding area and shall conform to the City of Ontario requirements.

3. Landscape streetscape improvements within CenterPark including public and private neighborhood streets, private drives, and alleys shall conform to the landscape treatment described in Section 7.11 Design Guidelines for Landscape Architectural Character of the CenterPark Specific Plan.

4. The design and improvement of all parks within CenterPark Specific Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Ontario and the requirements shall conform to the requirements of the City of Ontario’s Community Development and Public Works Agencies.

5. The installation of landscaping and automatic irrigation systems within the front yards of all residential lots shall be installed by the developer. Various landscape designs shall be provided by the homebuilder to the new homeowner, at a minimum, the builder shall install turf, groundcover and appropriate shrubs, and trees in the front yards of homes within residential areas. Within single-family detached conventional home areas, a minimum of two 24-inch box trees shall be installed of which one shall be a shade tree. Within other single-family detached and single-family attached home type areas, including condominiums, a minimum of one 24-inch box tree per detached home type or one 24-inch box tree for every 30 ft. of the building elevation, shall be installed, where feasible.

6. Within residential multi-family areas, the developer shall be responsible for the installation of full landscape improvements. Areas not used for hardscape shall be planted with landscaping. All landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Ontario.

7. All manufactured and cut/fill slopes exceeding 3 ft. in height shall be planted with an effective mixture of ground cover, shrubs and trees installed by the developer. Such slopes shall also be irrigated as necessary to comply with any required fuel modification requirements established by the City of Ontario erosion control requirements.
430

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
6-29
development regulations

6.10.2 Landscape Standards

1. Landscaping within the Specific Plan shall be provided in accordance with the Design Guidelines for streetscapes and entries utilizing plant materials specified on the Plant Palette Matrix included in Section 7, Community Design Guidelines of the CenterPark Specific Plan.

2. Boundary landscaping shall be required along the perimeter edges of the Specific Plan area.

Landscaping shall generally be placed along the entire perimeter property line and shall conform to the City’s requirements.

3. Landscaping and automatic irrigation systems within the public rights-of-way of the CenterPark Specific Plan shall be installed by the developer.

4. Freestanding, decorative perimeter walls and view fencing shall be provided within and at the perimeter of the project site as specified in the Wall and Fence Master Plan contained within Section 7, Community Design Guidelines of the CenterPark Specific Plan. Such walls and fences will be constructed concurrently with the construction of improvements required for development of the neighborhoods of the project.

5. Walls and Fencing – Walls and fencing within the Specific Plan area shall be constructed of a design consistent with the “Wall Details” exhibits located within Section 7, Community Design Guidelines of the CenterPark Specific Plan. Perimeter walls shall not exceed 6 ft. in height from finished grade, however, if required for sound attenuation, perimeter walls may exceed six 6 ft. in height, subject to the recommendations of an acoustical study and approval by the Planning Department.

6. All perimeter wall and fence materials throughout the project shall be of uniform manufacture with colors specified for the overall design theme as discussed in Section 7.16, Community Walls and Fencing of the CenterPark Specific Plan.

7. Perimeter walls shall be constructed of either decorative masonry or other permanent, durable, low maintenance material. Thematic perimeter fencing shall be constructed of all durable materials, which may include materials with a wood-like appearance or tubular steel subject to City of Ontario approval. Wooden fencing is not permitted along perimeter conditions or where the wall/fence is visible from the adjacent properties.

8. Individual residential lot side and rear yard walls and fencing shall not exceed 6 ft. in height from highest adjacent finished grade. Side and rear walls may exceed 6 ft. in height, if required by the City of Ontario for sound attenuation pursuant to the recommendations of an acoustical report. Walls and fencing within the residential front yard setback area shall not exceed 3 ft., in height. Side and rear yard walls shall be of decorative masonry construction on both sides or of other permanent low maintenance materials as approved by the Planning Department. View fencing may be of a decorative wrought iron, tubular steel/aluminum glass panels or other durable material approved by the City of Ontario.

9. Multi-family areas shall be HOA maintained.

10. Landscape slopes shall not exceed 3:1.
431
6-30

6.11 SIGNAGE
A Master Sign Program shall be submitted by the developer of each land use component of CenterPark and approved by the City of Ontario to address residential project entries, residential neighborhood identification signs, and way-finding signs within the project. No project signs shall be permitted in the public right-of-way.

All other signs shall be subject to the approval of a sign permit pursuant to the City of Ontario’s Development Code.

6.11.1 Master Sign Program Contents
All sign programs shall address, at a minimum, the following:

1. Permitted signs.

2. Prohibited signs.

3. The hierarchy of signage.

4. Definition of types of signs.

5. Locations and dimensions for monument signs, neighborhood identification signs and public facilities signs.

6. Locations and dimensions of directional signage.

7. Provisions for size, location and duration of display of temporary signs.

8. Permitted sign types, styles, construction materials, colors and lettering styles.

9. Requirements for a sign permit application.

10. Procedures for obtaining approval of a sign permit.

11. Procedures for amending the sign program.
432

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
6-31
development regulations

6.12 LIGHTING

6.12.1 Street Lights along Public Streets
Streetlights along public streets within the CenterPark Specific Plan shall be LED lighting. Design of fixtures shall be approved by the City of Ontario as part of the City of Ontario’s Development Plan review.

6.12.2 Alley Lighting Fixtures
Alley lighting fixtures shall be on sensors for automatic nighttime lighting. Style and specifications for alley lights shall be approved by the City of Ontario as part of the City’s Development Plan review.

6.12.3 Lighting within Parks, Paseos, Tot Lots, and Other Recreational Areas Lighting within parks, paseos, tot lots and other recreational areas shall be approved by the City of Ontario as part of the City’s Development Plan review of these facilities.

6.13 PARK FURNITURE
Park furniture, including but not limited to, benches, barbecues and picnic tables shall be approved as part of the City of Ontario’s Development Plan review of parks, paseos and other public gathering places.

6.14 BUS SHELTERS
Bus shelters shall be installed in a number of locations as per Omnitrans, and as approved by the City of Ontario Engineer and shall be compatible with the community character of CenterPark.

6.15 MAILBOXES
Within residential Planning Areas, mailboxes shall be clustered and installed in locations and in a design approved by the City of Ontario as part of the City of Ontario Development Plan review of each residential project within CenterPark. The location of all mailboxes shall be approved by the U.S. Post Office. 433
This page intentionally left blank
434

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-1
community design guidelines
SECTION 7: COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES

7.1 INTRODUCTION
The unique location of the project site provides both opportunities and challenges. The design approach for the CenterPark Specific Plan recognizes the opportunities, including several major landscaped arterial roadways, regionally important intersections supporting pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles and public transit systems and an adjacent 55 acre community park, and it responds to the challenges to balance retail, office and high density residential land uses with open space uses and planning for affordable neighborhoods within a transitional land use area and the Chino Airport influence zone.

The proposed community character for CenterPark will reflect the interactive and synergistic relationship between a planned residential community and a planned expansive open space. The CenterPark Specific Plan Design Guidelines will guide the physical character of all future multi-use and residential development, including retail, office and residential architectural buildings, community and neighborhood features and the overall landscape treatment within the project. The proposed community character will establish a unified aesthetic treatment responding to the community’s location.

7.2 GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER

7.2.1 Sustainability
“Green” or sustainable planning concepts, building designs and landscape treatments are encouraged within the project. The Community Plan for the CenterPark Specific Plan promotes pedestrian connectivity within and between the residential planning areas. The design of residential areas incorporates tree-lined parkways providing shade for pedestrians and parked cars. Safe and efficient pedestrian connectivity is provided throughout the project.

The CenterPark Design Guidelines allow for a variety of architectural styles that respond to the regional climate conditions. All new construction shall utilize design features, fixtures, appliances and heating and cooling controls to conserve energy and water. The landscape concept for CenterPark incorporates a plant palette and a planting and irrigation system designed to conserve water. Park and recreation areas shall include shaded areas, bicycle racks and other amenity features to encourage pedestrian and other non-vehicular activities. The sustainable goals for the CenterPark Specific Plan include:

1. Encourage walking and other non-vehicular modes of travel.

2. Provide pedestrian connectivity throughout the project.

3. Provide shaded outdoor areas.

4. Encourage the use of architectural elements designed to reduce interior heat gain.

5. Encourage the use of recycled, recyclable and environmentally-friendly building materials.

6. Require the use of low energy glass, low water plumbing features and energy efficient appliances.

7. Encourage the use of drought tolerant landscaping and water efficient irrigation methods. 435
7-2
Neighborhood site planning, architecture and building design as well as landscape treatment and maintenance within the project should consider these sustainable goals and further the implementation of sustainable design within CenterPark.

7.2.2 Architectural Character
Architectural design should provide for high-quality neighborhoods.

1. Residential project design should consider the total context of the site with the incorporation of appropriate scale and proportions of building massing and details.

2. Architectural design should relate to human scale.

3. The variation of front, side and rear building elevations should be implemented to create visual variety.

4. The variation of garage placement in single-family neighborhoods is encouraged to provide a more diverse street scene.

5. Cluster detached and attached neighborhoods should emphasize residential design solutions that reduce or eliminate individual garages and driveways oriented onto neighborhood streets.

6. Architectural design themes should reflect historic and emerging Southern California styles.

7. Structures should incorporate architectural details and decorative features that reinforce the intended style.

8. Architectural designs should create a cohesive community without dominating the overall street scene.

9. Neighborhood character should be sustained over time.

Building design should be sensitive to climatic conditions and context.

1. Structures should be compatible with, and responsive to, the environmental setting.

2. Building elevations should include shaded and sheltered areas.

3. Building designs should incorporate spaces that encourage outdoor use.

Architectural design should incorporate materials and techniques that are cost-effective.

1. The use of building materials should reflect the implementation of efficient construction methods.

2. Building elevations should include compatible window and door sizes that create a consistent design theme.

3. Construction techniques should incorporate the use of standard components and dimensions. 436

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-3
community design guidelines
Diversity is a fundamental design principle for CenterPark. To ensure that neighborhoods are varied and that blanket uniformity is avoided, the following criteria should be applied to all residential development projects within CenterPark:

Number of Dwelling Units Number of Differing Floor Plans and Elevations
Required Number of Differing
Exterior Elevations
5-10 2 2
11-25 2 3
26-50 3 3
51-75 3 4
76-100 4 4
Over 100 Requirement for 76 to 100 dwellings, plus one additional floor plan with 4 elevations for each additional 25 units exceeding 100 Detached single-family homes configured in a cluster or courtyard, and attached single-family buildings are required to select elevation styles from within the same design influence to ensure compatibility between closely plotted residential homes.

7.3 ARCHITECTURAL CONTEXT
The City of Ontario and the surrounding region has a rich agricultural legacy of farming. Farming communities in Southern California established a rural character with houses and neighborhoods utilizing a variety of traditional architectural styles. Architectural styles inherent in the early development of the southwestern United States and traditional East Coast architectural styles were incorporated into the farm houses and early rural neighborhoods. Architectural styles, elements and massing were reinvented utilizing available indigenous building materials. Plan designs and elements, such as window sizes and proportions, were modified to address local climatic conditions which were warmer and drier. Southern California was also influenced by Spanish architectural styles brought to the region by Spanish settlers and missionaries. These homes were well-suited for the temperate climate of Southern California.

The urbanization of coastal and inland areas in Southern California has resulted in another emerging architectural influence often described as transitional or adaptive styles. These styles may involve interpretation of historical architectural styles as well as modern architectural movements occurring within the last decade. A variety of materials were dominant throughout these styles, such as plaster, stucco and siding with brick, stone or other masonry accent materials.

The community vision for CenterPark is based upon the architectural influences found in early rural areas of Southern California. These architectural styles have been selected because of their connection to older Ontario neighborhoods as well as their appropriateness to accommodate innovative adaptive architectural influences.

Each architectural influence outlined in these guidelines should be detailed with elements that represent the character of that particular style.

Together, the styles should be designed to create a neighborhood character that will be sustainable over time. 437
7-4
Each home, building and street should be designed to contribute to the architectural character of the neighborhood. Design elements such as massing, proportions, balance, building and roof forms, entries, porches, window treatments, architectural details and accents, alternate garage configurations/orientations, balconies and roof form/pitch/detailing are should be considered to enhance individual structures and to promote the overall neighborhood character.

DESIGN OBJECTIVES

1. Interpret architectural styles that reflect the historical character of the region.

2. Emphasize styles of architecture that are compatible, yet vary enough to create interest and diversity.

3. Create visually interesting neighborhood streets by varying building plan and elevation plotting.

4. Utilize materials and colors that reinforce the overall design theme.

5. Emphasize front elevations that relate strongly to the street and contribute to pedestrian activity and interaction.

The CenterPark Design Guidelines are to be used as a tool to ensure the character and design quality anticipated and approved for the community is implemented as the Specific plan is implemented. The Guidelines express objectives and approaches rather than formulas and standards, allowing certain architectural creativity and flexibility. The images and sketches illustrated in the Guidelines are intended to be conceptual and are to be used as general visual aids in designing and reviewing the architectural design intent of CenterPark. They are not meant to depict specific floor plans or architectural elevations.

ARCHITECTURAL INFLUENCES
CenterPark strives to create a diverse but harmonious architectural palette. The architectural influences and selected styles share similar design attributes and have been selected in response to the following considerations:

1. They are representative of existing architecture within the City of Ontario and surrounding areas.

2. They are compatible and complementary.

3. They can be interpreted in a variety of ways.

4. They are generally accepted by the market.

5. They can be constructed using current building materials and methods.

The architectural character within each neighborhood shall consist of complementary traditional architectural styles accented or complemented by adaptive interpretations and styles. Architectural influences appropriate within CenterPark include the following:
438

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-5
community design guidelines

ONTARIO HERITAGE PALETTE

1. Traditional Influences – including architectural styles such as Colonial, East Coast Traditional and American Farmhouse.

2. Spanish Influences – including architectural styles such as Spanish Colonial, Monterey and Santa Barbara styles.

3. Southern California Influences – including architectural styles such as Ranch and Craftsman styles.

TRANSITIONAL PALETTE

1. Adaptive Traditional Influence – including transitional interpretations of Colonial, East Coast Traditional and American Farmhouse.

2. Transitional Southern European Influence – including adaptive expressions of Spanish, Tuscan and Italianate styles.

3. Transitional California Influence – including transitional interpretations of Ranch and Craftsman styles.

7.3.1 Traditional Influences
Architectural styles such as Colonial, East Coast Traditional and American Farmhouse The Traditional Influences, allowed within the CenterPark Specific Plan area, consist of architectural styles based on classical design principles established during the American Colonial period and interpreted or blended with various regional styles as development moved westward. Massing is horizontal in appearance with vertical proportioned windows and door surrounds. Front porches are common. The houses are composed of simple forms with centered entry elements over the front door.

Massing is simple and often symmetrical. Two-story rectangular masses are typical with added one-story elements such as porches and garages forming more complex building configurations. Both symmetrical and asymmetrical composition of doors and windows are used to create balanced building elevations.

General materials include horizontal siding or stucco with shingle, brick or stone veneer accents. Simple classical details include columns and door surrounds.

Roof forms include steep to medium roof pitch on the main building with shallow roof pitch used over porch elements. Roof materials are historically shake or shingle with more modern interpretations utilizing flat concrete roof tiles and architectural grade asphalt shingles. Roof dormers are often used to reinforce symmetrical elevations.

Typical design detail elements vary from simple to ornate and include shutters accented with color, front porches with wood or brick columns, gable accents and bay windows. Colonial and Traditional styles may include cupolas, weather vanes, decorative fascia details and other decorative roof ornamentations, while Farmhouse styles are generally less ornate, reflecting a more functional approach to architectural decoration.

Compatible alternative styles include Shingle, New England Monterey and Prairie styles. 439
7-6
Colonial style
Colonial style architecture reflects the historical homes originating along the Eastern coastal regions. Homes are characterized by simple building forms and gable roof design with symmetrical window arrangements and classical or simple architectural details. Window shutters, round or square columns and brick and/or decorative wood accents are examples of Colonial details.

East Coast Traditional style
East Coast Traditional styles are characterized by symmetrical building forms and simple rectangular massing. This style evolved across the Midwest States to Southern California, responding to local construction methods and available materials. Roof forms are predominantly gables with dormer accents.

Roof pitches are medium to steep (5:12 minimum). Classical porch columns and enriched wood detailing reinforce the symmetry of the building.

American Farmhouse style
American Farmhouse style homes evolved from the Traditional style to create a more rural interpretation of this popular suburban vernacular. The Farmhouse style utilizes simple window trim accents and a combination of vertical and horizontal siding. This style utilizes medium to steep gable roofs and an occasional gambrel form. American Farmhouse architecture often uses color to accentuate wood details.

Examples of Traditional Influence architectural styles are illustrated in Exhibit 7-1, Traditional Influences.

7.3.2 Spanish Influences
Architectural Styles such as Spanish Colonial, Monterey and Santa Barbara Styles Spanish influenced homes, are based on early California buildings constructed after the great California Gold Rush and are often adapted and blended with traditional building forms and materials from the Eastern United States. Spanish styles reflect strong form and mass, plain wall surfaces and are characterized by low pitched tile roofs. The Spanish Colonial style is often characterized by a semi-formal plan arrangement such as a courtyard design. The Monterey style often includes cantilevered balcony colonnades as a primary design element.

Building massing is generally simple massing. Roof forms are varied and include both gable and hip design.

Overall building forms are generally straightforward rectangular or “L” shaped. Building materials are predominately stucco finished walls with wood or stucco columns. The Monterey style typically has wood siding on the second level. Thick walls with recessed openings and round arched openings are common.

Window proportions are predominately vertical, especially on upper levels.

Roof materials and forms include low-pitched gable and shed roofs with various overhang dimensions. The roof designs generally have tight rake ends and/or extended eaves with exposed rafter tails. Spanish homes historically had clay tile roofs with the exception of Monterey styles, which often had wood shake roofs.

Modern interpretations utilize concrete ‘S’ tile or flat concrete tile roof materials in colors that reference clay or shake roof colors.
440

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-7
community design guidelines

TRADITIONAL INFLUENCES - SUMMARY

OF ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES
• Symmetrical or balanced front building elevation.
• Siding and stucco materials with brick/stone
accents.
• Gable roof forms with flat tile or architectural
shingles – accent dormer windows.
• Classical columns or pillars.
• Porches at entries and front doors.
• Decorative window shutters and window boxes, bay
windows.
• Classic detailing such as moldings, window trim,
cornices, pediments and shingle accents.

EXHIBIT 7-1 TRADITIONAL INFLUENCES
441
7-8
Design details and features are characterized by ornate wrought iron accents such as balcony railings, window grills and architectural accents. Balcony railing materials include wood pickets as well as wrought iron. Decorative stucco chimneys, decorative columns and simple wood window shutters are characteristic of the Spanish influenced styles.

Compatible alternative styles include Mission and Adobe Ranch styles.

Spanish Colonial style
Spanish Colonial style is a historic style utilizing strong and simple massing and form as well as plain wall surfaces without heavy ornamentation. Curved profile tile roofs on gently sloping planes (4:12 and less pitch) and gable forms characterize this style, along with arched or recessed window forms with simple wrought iron accents. Spanish Revival style is an early 20th century adaptation of Spanish Colonial architecture utilizing both hip and gable roof forms and curved profile roof tiles. Clean lines and simple massing without masonry accent elements differentiate this style from the similar Spanish Colonial architecture.

Monterey style
Monterey style is a regional derivative of Spanish and Eastern Colonial architecture. An adaptive interpretation of the New England counterpart, the Monterey style is typically characterized by two-story structures of simple massing with extended front balconies, often cantilevered. Gable or hip roof forms with exposed rafters, wood posts and shutters reinforce the Monterey style.

Santa Barbara style
Santa Barbara style is another California regional style with Spanish Colonial influences, interpreted in a more informal expression. Similar to Spanish Colonial architecture, the Santa Barbara style utilizes recessed windows and low-pitched roofs (3 to 4:12 pitch) with extended overhangs to address the temperate climatic conditions. Large arched feature windows and stucco columns are elements of this style.

Examples of Spanish Influence architectural styles are illustrated in Exhibit 7-2, Spanish Influences. 442

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-9
community design guidelines

SPANISH INFLUENCES - SUMMARY OF

ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES
• Simple massing and building elevation.
• Thickened stucco walls with simple detailing.
• Low pitched hip and gable roof forms with concrete
mission tile.
• Arched openings and decorative columns.
• Courtyards used at entries and covered patio areas
• Details such as wrought iron railing, ceramic tile and window shutter accents.
• Heavy wood members, extended rafters, simple
and ornate precast window sills and door surrounds.

EXHIBIT 7-2 SPANISH INFLUENCES
443
7-10

7.3.3 Southern California Influences
Architectural Styles such as Ranch and Craftsman Styles Varied architectural styles have evolved from the American Arts and Crafts movement including Ranch, Craftsman and Bungalow vernaculars. These moderately detailed buildings are characterized by the use of handcrafted architectural elements and details. The Ranch style is reminiscent of the early ranches and farms of the Southwestern United States.

Building massing is simple, dominated by horizontal massing and rectilinear forms. The styles, while varied, are all generally characterized by horizontal proportions, often with asymmetrical massing at the second level. Historically, several early architectural styles originated as one-story structures, but have been adapted and reinterpreted to two-story structures, especially in Southern California.

Deep, broad porch elements were developed to respond to warm climate conditions and inspired expressive structural elements such as rafters, posts and columns. A mixture of materials such as stucco, board and batten and horizontal siding, with stone, brick or shingle accents are commonly used. The use of wood, stone or brick at porch columns is typical. Asymmetrical doors and windows with simple wood trim surrounds are characteristic of styles within the Southern California architectural influence.

Roof forms of Ranch, Craftsman and Bungalow styles are predominantly low to medium pitched gable designs with occasional hipped or shed roof accents. Deep overhangs and roof dormers reinforce the overall character of these styles. Modern roof materials range from flat concrete tile to architectural grade asphalt shingle.

Compatible alternative styles include Bungalow and Coastal Cottage styles.

Design and detail elements include large gables, windows with accent mullions, triangular knee braces at porch supports, accent roofs and heavy columns or posts, window shutters, decorative gable vent details, and outdoor trellis features.

Ranch style
Ranch style is reminiscent of early country homes in Southern California. This style was popularized by Cliff May and other local architects. Covered porches and terraces utilize simplified architectural details from Colonial and Monterey styles. Horizontal massing and rectilinear forms with wood window surrounds, heavy wood columns and simple shutters characterize the Ranch style.

Craftsman style
Craftsman style homes evolved from the late 19th Century Arts and Crafts movement. Broad open porches covered with low sloping roofs with deep overhangs supported by tapered wood and masonry columns, decorative window patterns and trim, wooden braces and horizontal proportions reinforce the Craftsman style. Low to medium pitched roofs (5:12 or less pitch) are common.

Examples of Southwestern Influence architectural styles are illustrated in Exhibit 7-3, Southern California Influences.
444

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-11
community design guidelines

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INFLUENCES -

SUMMARY OF ARCHITECTURAL

FEATURES
• Emphasis on horizontal massing and proportions.
• Horizontal and vertical siding materials with stucco
walls.
• Low pitched roof forms with flat tile or shingles and extended eaves.
• Simple exteriors with functional ornamentation -
brick and stone used for accent building forms.
• Details such as decorative bracing, brick and stone
wall treatment, window shutter and accent colors.
• Exposed rafters, simple header and window sills
and door surrounds.

EXHIBIT 7-3 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INFLUENCES
445
7-12

7.3.4 Art Deco/Modern Influences
Architectural Styles such as Art Deco and Modern Styles Art Deco architecture emerged during the early 20th century and increased in popularity and influence until the mid-century. The bold geometric lines and rich ornamentation generated a luxurious and lavish character symbolized by the art and fashion of the Bohemian art period and became a representation of progress, modernism and luxury.

As construction technology trended to taller buildings, the Art Deco style, with emphasis on vertical elements such as towers, spires and planted-on column features. Inspired by the technological advancements associated with the industrialized machinery, the architectural forms and details reflected streamlined forms mimicking automobiles and trains of the era. Taller buildings incorporated symmetrical monumental designs while lower profile buildings and residential structures used asymmetrical balance to create interesting and contextual architectural elevations.

Art Deco/Modern style
The Art Deco style became a predominate style in larger, urban structures such as office buildings, large retail and residential skyscrapers that were designed in the first half of the twentieth century. In today’s production building environment, the Art Deco influence has demonstrated to be suitable for larger single-family attached and multi-family buildings.

The streamlined detailing and softened building forms create an iconic character that is compatible with architectural styles, both old and new. Appropriate architectural interpretations within the Art Deco/Modern Influences should be compatible with other selected architectural styles within CenterPark.

Compatible architectural styles include Mid-Century Contemporary and Bauhaus styles.

General materials include stucco with geometric bands or accents. Roof forms are generally flat and roof materials include concrete tile, standing seam metal or a combination of roof materials.

Examples of appropriate architectural styles are illustrated in Exhibit 7-4, Art Deco/Modern Influences. 446

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-13
community design guidelines

ART DECO/MODERN INFLUENCES -

SUMMARY OF ARCHITECTURAL

FEATURES
• Emphasis on simple, sleek lines and vertical
proportions with asymmetrical balanced facades.
• Smooth stucco walls with regular or modular forms.
• Flat roof forms with minimal or no cap treatment -
curved roof and corner elements.
• Uncluttered exteriors with geometric ornamentation
- strong building forms provide detail.
• Accents include stylized motifs, intricate reliefs/
patterns – accent materials include terra cotta and
metallic details.
• Bold accent forms, materials and colors to add
visual interest.

EXHIBIT 7-4 ART DECO/MODERN INFLUENCES
447
7-14

7.3.5 Adaptive Traditional Influences
Adaptive Interpretations of the Architectural Styles of the Traditional Influence Twentieth Century construction technology created an evolution of “new” architectural styles. Many of these styles were reinterpretations of classical styles (such as Neo-Classical) while others were simpler expressions that adapted to context and climate conditions. Appropriate architectural interpretations within the Transitional Palette should be compatible with other selected architectural styles within CenterPark.

Building massing within the Adaptive Transitional Palette is defined by its simplicity and follows the rule that “form follows function”. It is intended to introduce style variations to provide a reasonable proportion to buildings that exceed the typical scale of architectural styles that were historically used in single-family detached houses and are suitable for larger buildings generally anticipated for single-family attached and multi-family structures.

Both rectilinear and softened building forms provide the aesthetic balance to this emphasis on function.

Ornamentation is minimized and building character is established by the architectural mass and use of materials. Window patterns are geometrically composed.

The Traditional Influences within the CenterPark Specific Plan area include architectural styles from the American Colonial period. These styles have been reinterpreted or blended with various regional design elements and evolved into a cleaner, simpler overall character, omitting or de-emphasizing details in favor of strong contrasting colors.

General materials include horizontal siding or stucco with minimal or monochromatic accents. Roof materials may include concrete tile, standing seam metal, architectural grade asphalt shingles or a combination of roof materials.

Roof details reflect less ornamentation. Eaves and overhangs may be boxed-in or omitted. Roof materials do not utilize blended colors. Examples of appropriate architectural styles are illustrated in Exhibit 7-5, Adaptive Traditional Influences.
448

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-15
community design guidelines

ADAPTIVE TRADITIONAL INFLUENCES -

SUMMARY OF ARCHITECTURAL

FEATURES
• Material and colors reinforce horizontal proportions. • Wood planks, varied siding materials and stucco
walls with accent brick or stone.
• Simplified roof forms with flat tile or shingles.
• Simple exteriors with minimal or light ornamentation
– modern materials used to accent building forms.
• Formal window composition and simple entry doors
reflect classic architectural influence.
• Extended overhangs and shaded windows provide
functional design elements and shade.

EXHIBIT 7-5 ADAPTIVE TRADITIONAL INFLUENCES
449
7-16

7.3.6 Transitional Southern European Influences
Transitional Interpretations of the Architectural Styles from the Spanish Influences The modern interpretations of Southern European architectural styles expressed a wider definition of “Farmhouse” as it infiltrated rural America. The functional simplicity of Spanish and other Southern European styles established a transitional interpretation of Spanish, Tuscan and Italianate architecture.

Appropriate transitional architectural interpretations of Southern European influences should be compatible with other selected architectural styles within CenterPark.

The transitional influence includes several contemporary interpretations of the other historical and period architectural styles selected for CenterPark. It also anticipates modern building forms that provide a reasonable scale to buildings that exceed the typical size and massing of architectural styles that were historically used in single-family detached houses and are suitable for larger buildings generally anticipated for single-family attached and multi-family structures.

Spanish influenced homes, appropriate within the CenterPark Specific Plan area, reflect a blending with the influence of the early Catholic Mission. The simplicity of the historic form and mass is elegantly adapted to reflect a clean and simple design character.

Building massing is generally simple massing, allowing “form to follow function” to address solar orientation and other climatic considerations and to accommodate efficient design. Overall building forms are generally rectangular with simple low-pitched gable or hip roof forms.

Roof materials may include “S” tile and flat concrete tile, standing seam metal roofs or a combination of roof materials. Traditional roof overhang dimensions are often reduced and clean design lines are introduced to support the intended style.

Design details include minimal or simple wrought iron elements and no window surrounds. Examples of appropriate architectural styles are illustrated in Exhibit 7-6, Transitional Southern European Influences. 450

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-17
community design guidelines

TRANSITIONAL SOUTHERN EUROPEAN

INFLUENCES - SUMMARY OF

ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES
• Simplified building forms and massing breaks to
replicate traditional influences.
• Stucco walls with simple detailing and complementary masonry accents to reinforce massing. • Low pitched hip and gable roof forms with concrete
tile.
• Colonial details such as arches, precast surround
and columns are omitted or reduced in scale.
• Authentic detailing such as railing, window trim and
ornamentation is simplified or modernized.

EXHIBIT 7-6 TRANSITIONAL SOUTHERN EUROPEAN INFLUENCES
451
7-18

7.3.7 Transitional Southern California Influences
Transitional Interpretations of the Architectural Styles from the Southern California Influences
Varied architectural styles from rural towns from the early development of Southern California around the turn of the 20th century have evolved as new construction technology created an evolution of “new” architectural reinterpretations. Many of these reinterpretations of traditional styles that popularize minimal ornamentation and “non-functional” architectural elements create fresh and clean new expressions of Craftsman and Ranch style houses. Appropriate transitional architectural interpretations of Southern California influences should be compatible with other selected architectural styles within CenterPark.

Several roof forms and materials are characteristic within transitional styles. Appropriate forms in a residential context include traditional hip and gable designs, but also include flat roofs with parapet walls and shed roofs. Roof materials may include concrete tile, standing seam metal, architectural grade asphalt shingles or a combination of roof materials.

Traditional design elements are refined to reflect the simplicity of the building, incorporating material or color changes to provide accents and interest. Enlarged overhangs and sunshades, simple windows with thinner profiles and minimal or no trim details and contemporary metal railing are characteristic of transitional architectural styles. Extended roof and window overhangs and trellis elements are introduced in response to warm climate conditions.

Examples of Transitional Southern California Influence architectural styles are illustrated in Exhibit 7-7, Transitional Southern California Influences.
452

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-19
community design guidelines

TRANSITIONAL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

INFLUENCES - SUMMARY OF

ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES
• Horizontal design emphasis used to reduce scale
of larger buildings to reduce overall massing and
promote single-story proportions.
• Building materials including siding and stucco with
linear stone or brick detailing used as accents.
• Simplified symmetrical or asymmetrical roof forms
and flat roofs - extended overhangs over windows.
• Simple exteriors with reduced ornamentation and
details - brick and stone used for accent building
forms.
• Simple outlookers/wood bracing, brick and stone
accent materials and colored siding used to
reinforce historic Southern California architectural
influences.

EXHIBIT 7-7 TRANSITIONAL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INFLUENCES 453
7-20

7.4 MASSING PRINCIPLES
This section provides suggestions for creating neighborhoods and street scenes that have a variety of building forms that create an attractive and vibrant streetscape and public realm that is proportionate to a human-scale and inviting to the pedestrian.

GENERAL ELEMENTS:

1. Front Articulation.

2. Side Articulation

3. Rear Articulation.

4. Roof Form.

5. Balconies and Projections.

6. Building Composition.

OBJECTIVES:

1. Establish a residential scale through architectural design and detailing that reinforces the architectural style.

2. Avoid flat, unarticulated two- and three-story walls that do not reinforce the architectural style or add to the overall building composition.

3. Minimize two- and three-story dominance of the street scene, on sidewalks and open spaces.

4. Upper-level units shall include usable outdoor space/balconies.

7.4.1 Front Articulation
The front elevation of the building is an important element in creating a quality community at CenterPark.

Close attention will be placed on all front elevations and how they address the street scene. Emphasis of the location of entries, living areas, and garages will provide a special street appeal.

Emphasis on a variety of building massing will create a diverse street scene.

Guidelines:

1. Building massing should reflect the architectural style.

2. Massing elements should avoid elevations that appear to be “tacked on”.

3. Building details such as doors and windows should be in proportion to the overall massing.

4. Front elevations for two-story buildings should incorporate a single-story element, if feasible. 454

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-21
community design guidelines

5. Front elevations for three-story buildings should incorporate one- or two-story elements.

6. All detached homes should have at least two plane variations in the front elevation massing.

7. Blank or unarticulated (uninterrupted) two- and three-story walls are prohibited.

8. Corner homes/buildings should provide massing and details that reflect the visual prominence of this location at a pedestrian scale.

7.4.2 Side Articulation
Four-sided architecture is required throughout CenterPark; however, it is recognized that some buildings sited in close proximity along a street establish a side-to-side orientation where the interior side elevations are less visible from the street. This section shall address this portion of buildings within the context of a specific neighborhood. It is not applicable to side elevations where a front entry door is located (often referred to as a side entry), which should be designed in accordance with the criteria for front articulation.

Guidelines:

1. Architectural articulation should be consistent with the style of the home/building.

2. Vertical and horizontal plane breaks are encouraged.

3. Building details should be proportional to the overall massing.

4. Blank or unarticulated (uninterrupted) two- and three-story walls are discouraged in areas visible from the street and/or common areas.

7.4.3 Rear Articulation
The rear elevation of buildings is an important design consideration, especially with attached home types such as row townhomes and motorcourt buildings, since the rear elevation is often as visually prominent as the front elevation. All building elevations shall address the visual interest and human scale appropriate to the pedestrian activity within the neighborhood.

Special attention shall be given to the design of those dwellings adjacent to, or in close proximity of, arterial roadways, primary local streets, interior local streets, parks, common areas and open spaces.

Whether viewed from distant or close range, massing requirements will be implemented to ensure positive community character in these conditions. Generally, repetitious elements such as similar building profiles and continuous gable ends are to be avoided.

Guidelines:

1. Architectural massing and articulation should be consistent with the style of the home.

2. Vertical and horizontal plane breaks are encouraged.

3. Building details should be proportional to the overall massing. 455
7-22

4. Blank or unarticulated (uninterrupted) two- and three-story walls are discouraged in areas visible from the street and/or common areas.

5. Buildings and homes directly adjacent to arterial roadways, collector roads, entry drives, common areas, lanes (alleys) and open spaces should be given particular attention in their rear articulation.

7.4.4 Roof Forms
Roof forms are another important design element as it relates to the massing and the overall character of the community, when seen from both the external edges and inside the neighborhood. A variety of roof forms along streets creates visual interest. Appropriate massing of roof forms helps to create human scale architecture to the street.

Guidelines:

1. Roof forms/pitch should reinforce the architectural style of the home.

2. Roofs shall be composed of simple roof forms.

3. Primary roof forms should be gable or hip designs or should be characteristic of the represented architectural style.

4. Changes in the primary roof (ridge) orientation are encouraged.

5. Flat roof elements should be incorporated only if appropriate to the architectural style.

7.4.5 Balconies and Projections
As part of the overall design of a two-story or three-story building, balconies and projections provide massing relief and interest at the second story. Balcony projections shall be consistent with the architectural character of the home. Additionally, these elements help to create ideal outdoor spaces.

Guidelines:

1. Balcony design should reinforce the architectural style of the building.

2. In multiple unit buildings, balcony composition should create visual interest and organization of forms.

3. Balconies should be designed to screen stored items. 456

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-23
community design guidelines

7.4.6 Building Composition
The composition of a residential building should enhance and reinforce the intended architectural character.

The building composition is a result of careful consideration of several architectural design components such as the overall building form, proportion and scale, fenestration and building offsets. Architectural design components such as the articulation of each elevation, the roof design, design of exterior features including balconies, window seats, dormers and architectural projections, as well as the arrangement of windows and doors contribute to an attractive and well composed building.

Guidelines:

1. The composition of architectural design components should be consistent with the style of the building or home.

2. Visual interest should be established by a variety of design techniques including fenestration, articulation, architectural projections, building offsets and/or architectural details.

3. Windows and other exterior openings should be stacked or otherwise arranged in an attractive manner that reinforces the architectural character of the building.

4. Entries should be articulated as an important architectural feature.

5. Focal windows should be articulated as important design features.

7.4.7 Front Porches and Entry Courtyards
Several of the architectural styles within the Ontario Heritage Architecture Palette and the Transitional Architecture Palette are characterized by front porches, covered entries and entry courtyards. These elements are important design features in the interpretation and reinforcement of the intended aesthetic character.

Guidelines:

1. Porches and covered entries are encouraged to enhance the entries to individual residences.

2. Porches should have a minimum depth of 5 ft.. 7ft. deep porches are encouraged for buildings within the Ontario Heritage Architecture Palette, including American Farmhouse, Ranch and Craftsman styles.

3. Wrap-around porches are encouraged at corner conditions.

4. Covered entries should be used on at least 50% of the entries on front elevations of attached residential housing types and all building elevations that are visible from public or private streets.

5. Entry courtyards, including enclosed patio areas, are characteristic of architecture styles within the Spanish and Southern European Influences. Entry courtyards shall be a minimum of 5 ft. in depth and

7.5 ft. deep courtyards are encouraged along public streets and adjacent to visible open spaces. 457
7-24

7.5 GARAGE PLACEMENT
The configuration, location and orientation of the garage are integral design elements, both for the composition of detached houses and attached residential buildings and for its visual and functional impacts to local neighborhood streets. De-emphasizing the garage is important in order to maintain the overall community design. Emphasizing the living areas of the home as they address the street will help achieve this goal. Single-family homes should orient garages onto private common driveways, wherever possible, to minimize the visual impact of garages facing neighborhood streets and individual driveway interruptions along these streets. Rear loaded homes, courtyard homes and cluster homes are effective home types and are encouraged. Preferred garage orientation onto private drives and driveways as illustrated in Exhibit 7-8, Garage Placement, reinforce the overall pedestrian experience within each neighborhood in CenterPark.

GUIDELINES:

1. Cluster homes and rear loaded homes which eliminate or minimize garages facing neighborhood streets are encouraged.

2. Standard double car garage doors are to be recessed a minimum of 8-inch from the face of the garage wall.

3. Standard street facing 3-car garage configurations are not allowed.

4. Shallow recessed two-car garages shall have a minimum setback of 3 ft. measured from the garage face to the back of the curb.

EXHIBIT 7-8 GARAGE PLACEMENT
458

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-25
community design guidelines

7.6 MATERIALS AND DETAILS
Architectural materials and detailing are fundamental elements to creating quality communities. Appropriate focus should be given to the architectural details the design of the details, and architectural elements of the building.

GENERAL ELEMENTS

1. Wall Materials/Finishes.

2. Accent Materials.

3. Doors and Windows.

4. Roofing Materials and Slope.

5. Fascias, Eaves and Rakes.

6. Exterior Colors.

7.6.1 Wall Materials/Finishes
Approved Materials:

1. Board and batten siding.

2. Cement plank siding.

3. Stucco.

4. Exposed masonry walls (no unfinished precision block; decorative block only: brick, slump block, etc.).

5. Stone, brick, brick veneers (accent materials).

Approved Finishes:

1. Stucco finishes appropriate to the architectural style of the building.

2. Smooth or sand finishes are encouraged.

3. Vinyl siding prohibited.

Guidelines:

1. Building materials should reflect the architectural style of the building.

2. Masonry elements and accents should reflect building forms and not appear as an applied veneer. 459
7-26

7.6.2 Accent Materials
Accent materials promote individuality in each home and ensure diverse character within the neighborhood.

Accents can be used to reinforce the architectural theme of the building.

Guidelines:

1. Accent materials should complement the overall color and style of the building.

2. Accent materials shall terminate at inside corners or be wrapped to coincide with an architectural element.

3. Accent materials may terminate at location of the lateral fence or at logical end, as approved by the Planning Department.

4. Architectural trim shall be applied to all elevations and shall be consistent with front elevation of the building.

7.6.3 Doors and Windows
The design and detail of the doors and windows on a home reinforce the architectural style and are key elements in the composition of the exterior elevation of the building.

Guidelines:

1. Door designs shall be consistent with the architectural style of the building.

2. Doors should be protected by porch elements or recessed entries.

3. Garage and entry door designs shall be appropriate to the style of the building.

4. Alignment and proportions of windows shall be appropriate to the architectural style of the building.

5. All windows (including garage door windows) are to be consistent with the architectural style of the building.

6. Divided light windows are encouraged, if they reinforce the intended architectural style.

7. Window details such as shutters, trim surrounds, window boxes and window recesses are encouraged to reinforce the intended architectural style.

8. Reflective glazing is not permitted.
460

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-27
community design guidelines

7.6.4 Roofing Materials and Slope
Roofing materials as well as roof forms, pitch and design details are integral elements that reinforce the intended architectural style of the building. Proposed roofs should reflect the architectural style of the building. Roof slopes should be reflective of the character of the building and accent roof elements should reflect the appropriate architectural style.

Attention should be given to address the context of the roof of each home relative to the adjacent building along the street.

Approved Roofing Materials (subject to compatibility with the intended architectural style):

1. Concrete tile (flat or curved profile).

2. Clay tile.

3. Slate.

4. High profile composition shingle (3-dimensional).

5. Standing seam metal.

Prohibited Roof Materials:

1. Wood shake.

2. Wood shingle.

3. Low profile asphalt composition.

4. Corrugated metal.

Guidelines:

1. Roof materials and roof pitches need to be selected to reinforce the architectural style.

2. Standing seam metal roofs painted in non-reflective neutral colors are allowed in appropriate architectural styles.

3. Avoid repetition in continuous gable-ends and similar ridge heights. 461
7-28

7.6.5 Eaves, Fascias and Rakes
Guidelines:

1. Eave, fascia and rake proportions are to be appropriate to the architectural style.

2. Larger eave overhangs provide opportunities for shading and should be used in appropriate architectural styles.

3. Exposed rafter tails shall be a minimum of 4-inch in thickness.

7.6.6 Exterior Colors
Building colors are important to establishing a blended community at CenterPark, yet they should give the impression that each home was designed on its own. Appropriate color selections make each building unique, but still look natural and in place in the neighborhood context.

Guidelines:

1. Diversity of color is encouraged.

2. Color shall contribute to distinguishing the overall architectural style of the building.

3. Colors should reflect the natural hues found in Southern California.

4. Color and hue variation in adjacent homes shall be provided to create neighborhood diversity.

A minimum of four different color schemes shall be provided for each architectural style.

7.7 ADDITIONAL DESIGN ELEMENTS
Design elements that are utilitarian in nature should be designed as integral features that support the intended architectural style.

GUIDELINES:

1. Gutters and downspouts should be designed to minimize their visibility from streets and common areas.

2. Exposed gutters and downspouts shall match roof or wall color.

3. Faux copper patina is acceptable.

4. Rooftop mechanical equipment is prohibited.

5. Air conditioning/heating equipment shall be screened from the street and neighboring views and shall be ground mounted.

6. Pool, spa and water softening equipment shall be screened from neighboring views.

7. Meters shall be screened from public view to the extent possible. 462

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-29
community design guidelines

8. Back flow preventers shall be adequately screened from public view.

9. Decorative paving shall be provided at appropriate locations, subject to approval of the Planning Director. Appropriate locations include, but are not limited to, pedestrian crossing locations and areas of high expected pedestrian travel, entry locations to common walkways, access to parks and common open space.

7.8 MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL/OFFICE GUIDELINES
CenterPark Specific Plan allows for Commercial and Office developments within Planning Areas 4, 5, 10 and 11 along Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue. These areas combine for approximately 44.3 acres and will be designed to create a place for surrounding residents to have access to shopping and employment opportunities within CenterPark. Surrounding residents will have the ability to access services by foot or bicycle.

Mixed-use planning areas are oriented into this primary intersection connecting the community to the overall Ontario Ranch and the rest of the City of Ontario.

The location of PA 4, 5, 10 and 11 along Ontario Ranch Road create the opportunity for thematic intersection monumentation. This intersection will provide a sense of place for the CenterPark area and will establish a cohesive design character defining the CenterPark planned community. In order tomaintain an overall character of CenterPark area, combining commercial and office uses, development is expected to be designed with a compatible and harmonious character with quality that is harmonious and integral to the residential neighborhoods and the overall sense of place for CenterPark.

These Commercial/Office Design Guidelines will help facilitate the development of the area to enhance the pedestrian experience that positively contributes to the character of CenterPark Specific Plan area. These guidelines are general in nature and are not intended to be strictly enforced rules, but as a tool in aiding the design process. Developers of future commercial and/or office projects will be required to submit Development Plans to the City demonstrating consistency with the CenterPark Specific Plan that includes these Guidelines, for City approval.
463
7-30

7.8.1 Architectural Design

7.8.1.1 Guiding Principles
Guiding Principles for commercial/office design for CenterPark Specific Plan are:

Buildings should contribute to a qualitative nature of the overall neighborhood. • Proper scale and proportions in massing and details should be used. • Pedestrian open spaces should be provided.
• Massing and articulation should be varied.
• Buildings shall be designed at a human-scale.

Buildings should have an enduring quality.
• Design should draw inspiration from the rich and diverse Southern California architectural heritage. • Materials and colors typical to Southern California should be used. • Details and ornamentation should be authentic.
• Design shall create an inviting place to shop and work. 464

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-31
community design guidelines

7.8.1.2 Site Planning
Orientation
Buildings should be oriented for optimal visibility from the street. Windows and entries should face the street avoiding blank walls dominating public views. Stores with entries not visible from the street may be oriented towards pedestrian open space and all primary entries should face onto a street or a connecting walkway.

Building clusterings are recommended to help define parking lot areas and encourage walking between stores. Building entries and storefronts should be positioned close to one another to reduce walking distances between them.

Driveways and Sidewalks
The site shall be provided with an adequate number of driveways to facilitate circulation and also reduce the traffic impact along the surrounding arterials. Pedestrian crossing distances should be minimized at driveways. All driveways and sidewalks shall be constructed per City Standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. No decorative paving will be allowed in the public right-of-way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

Street Frontage and Buildings
Streetside buildings, or those with no parking separating them from the street, should use windows and entry features to soften the building’s appearance to the street.

Streetside Setbacks and Buildings
The sides of buildings along street edges shall be landscaped within the setback to soften the building’s appearance as well as designed with windows or design elements.

Refuse Containers, Utility and Mechanical Equipment
Refuse containers and equipment shall be easily accessed by service vehicles. They shall be screened from view of the streets, parking lots, and connecting walkways through roof forms, walls and/or landscaping.

Screening details should incorporate elements that are compatible to the architectural style of the buildings. Proper landscaping, including trellises, may also help to screen these elements. Equipment and enclosures shall not be located near pedestrian walkways. Roof-mounted equipment shall be screened by the roof/ parapet and strategically located from the visibility of the public view.

Sidewalks
Public sidewalks shall be located along natural pedestrian travel paths and should be a minimum of 5 ft. wide. All walkways shall be a minimum of 4 ft. wide within developments in the Specific Plan area will comply withe ADA standards for accessibility.
465
7-32

7.8.1.3 Building Design
Massing
With larger buildings, appropriate massing becomes more important to maintain the human-scale of the development and create a visually pleasing environment. Bay windows, stepped buildings, height changes and setback variations between stores help to break up large buildings as well as indicate entries and store locations to customers. Tower elements or monumental features are encouraged at focal points, such as corners, plazas, major entrances, or where walkways meet streets.

Varying setbacks along the front façade of buildings are recommended to create small outdoor public spaces for pedestrians to gather and sit.

Roof Forms
Roof pitches shall be compatible to the architectural style of the buildings. Flat roofs should vary in height and be accompanied by cornice, trim or other accent features.

Arcades and Awnings
Outdoor arcades along store fronts are encouraged over pedestrian walkways. Arcades may be used to connect separate buildings providing a more pleasing experience for pedestrians. Trellises or awnings may also be used to create a covered walkway to protect pedestrians from the sun and rain.

Entry Design
Building entries shall be prominent and easily identified. Various elements can be used to enhance the entry features including massing variation, materials and color change, change in roof form, and awnings.

For smaller retail buildings that are part of a cluster or strip, arcades, awnings and simple signage may be acceptable as entries.

No signs shall be placed in the public right-of-way and shall be in accordance with City standards regarding corner site distance.

Design Flexibility
Retail spaces exceeding 30,000 sq. ft. should be designed with the flexibility to be divisible into smaller retail spaces, should future market demand change.

Façades that are visible from adjacent streets or walkways should display even greater visual interest by using architectural elements that break up the massing of large buildings, such as windows, arcades, awnings, porticos, and other architectural features.

Base and Top Treatments
Base and top treatments help to balance the “weight” of the building visually. Bases should appear to “ground” the building, while tops create a defined edge to the roofline. Possible treatment techniques are as follows:
466

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-33
community design guidelines
Base:
• Natural materials.
• Enriched landscaping with a mature height of at least 18-inch. • Pre-cast materials.
• Other decorative, durable materials as approved by the City. • Thicker walls.

Tops:
• Cornice treatments.
• Roof overhangs with brackets.
• Stepped parapets.
• Textured materials - Colored “stripes” are not acceptable as the only treatment.

Exterior Materials
Recommended materials include, but are not limited to stucco, exterior plaster, brick, wood siding, tile, pre-cast concrete or stone. Exterior materials that appear pre-fabricated are not recommended.

Selected materials and detailing should have an enduring appearance. Foam products should be avoided at the pedestrian level.

Roof Materials
Roofing materials that are generally acceptable include standing metal seam, concrete tile, tile and slate or slate-like materials. Asphalt or wood shingles are prohibited.

Colors
Color selection shall be consistent with the selected architectural style. 467
7-34

7.9 COMMUNITY STRUCTURES
Community structures should be designed to reinforce the architectural style of the surrounding neighborhood and the overall CenterPark Community.

GUIDELINES:

1. Detached structures, such as restroom buildings, pool cabanas and gate houses associated with individual neighborhoods shall be designed to match the style, detail, roof material/pitch and massing criteria of the primary buildings within the neighborhood.

2. Detached garages, storage buildings and utility buildings should incorporate design features, materials and colors compatible with the primary buildings within the neighborhood.

7.10 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER The vision for CenterPark – the experience of scenery and the interface between urban design and natural landscape – inspired the overall community landscape character and treatment for the CenterPark Specific Plan. The following Design Guidelines are organized to define the basic landscape design principles for CenterPark. Observing these Guidelines will help to implement the overall design vision and assure the design integrity of CenterPark throughout implementation.

All landscape plans, streetscape plans and graphic designs with regard to community identity, neighborhood identity or entry monumentation shall conform to the guidelines as set forth herein and shall be subject to review and approval by the City of Ontario. Landscaping utilized for Ontario Ranch Road, Campus, Bon View, Grove and Walker Avenues shall be designed in accordance with the Ontario Ranch Streetscape Master Plan and Landscape Development Standards.
468

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-35
community design guidelines

7.11 FRAMEWORK STREETSCAPE DESIGN
Streetscape design guidelines establish a hierarchy for the landscape development along the surrounding roadways, as well as establish a framework for consistency of design. Framework streets traverse the Specific Plan and intersect project site at the central mixed-use planning areas. They also provide a gateway to the City of Ontario Grand Park. See Exhibit 7-9, Landscape Framework Plan. The framework streets are defined as follows:

1. Ontario Ranch Road.

2. Grove Avenue.

3. Grand Park Avenue.

The design of neighborhoods within CenterPark further reinforces the hierarchy of streets within the Specific Plan. The neighborhood streets provide for local circulation and access for residents and visitors.

These streets may be public or private. Local neighborhood streets will be designed to meet public roadway engineering and construction standards. The internal local streets include the following:

1. Cucamonga Avenue and Parco Ave.

2. Local Public Neighborhood Streets.

3. Private/Common Drives.

4. Private Driveways/Alleys.
469
7-36
Eucalyptus Ave
Campus Ave
Edison Ave/
Ontario Ranch Rd
Cucamonga Ave
Sultana Ave
Bon View Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Campus Ave
Bon View Ave
Cucamonga Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Baker Ave Baker Ave
Sultana Ave
Edison Ave/
Ontario Ranch Rd
*
*
Community Entry (Right)
Community Entry (Left)
Primary Intersection
Grand Park Entry
Enhanced Pedestrian Crossing
Neighborhood Park
Park / Open Space
East / West Primary Corridor
North / South Primary Corridor
Grand Park Avenue
*
EXHIBIT 7-9 LANDSCAPE FRAMEWORK PLAN
470

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-37
community design guidelines

7.12 LANDSCAPE STREETSCAPE TREATMENT
The overall landscape treatment along the streets within the CenterPark Specific Plan establish the general framework for the community. Tree plantings within landscape buffers and neighborhood edges combined with the master planned street trees and landscape treatment along public streets, private streets and private drives, create a spatial hierarchy and visual character throughout the community and within the residential neighborhoods of CenterPark.
471
7-38

7.12.1 Ontario Ranch Road
Ontario Ranch Road traverses the CenterPark Specific Plan area in an east/west direction from Campus Avenue to Walker Avenue. The Ontario Ranch Road streetscape will be developed in accordance with the Ontario Ranch Streetscape Master Plan 2018. On Ontario Ranch Road the streetscape trees are of the Quercus agrifolia (Coast Live Oak), Pinus eldarica (Afghan Pine) as well as Lagerstroemia ‘Natchez’ (White Crape Myrtle). Approved shrubs include Viburnum tinus ‘Spring Bouquet’(Laurustinus) and Rosa ‘Pink Iceberg’ (Pink Iceberg Shrub Rose).

The streetscape plan for Ontario Ranch Road is illustrated in Exhibit 7-10, Ontario Ranch Road Streetscape. Improvements within the neighborhood edge of the CenterPark development may include monumentation within the landscape buffer area as shown on Exhibit 7-9, Landscape Framework Plan.

The typical cross section for Ontario Ranch Road in the Ontario Ranch Streetscape Master Plan 2018 includes a raised center median planted with deciduous trees. There are existing public utilities located within the future median area. There may be planting or other restrictions within these utility easements.

These restrictions may conflict with the typical Master Planned street section. Any such conflicts will be discussed with the affected public agencies and resolved concurrent with TTM approval for the adjacent property.
472

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-39
community design guidelines
NORTH
26’
MEDIAN
12’ 15’ 13’ 12’ 15’ 12’ 12’ 13’
52’

ROADWAY
15’
R.O.W.
52’

ROADWAY
15’
R.O.W.
65 TREE LEGEND

SIZE SPACING SPACING

SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME HEIGHT X SPREAD RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL TYPE CINNAMOMUM CAMPHORA / CAMPHOR TREE 40’ x 40’ at 30’ o.c. at 40’ o.c. Evergreen LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA ‘NATCHEZ’ / WHITE CRAPE MYRTLE 20’ x 12’ at 15’ o.c. at 15’ o.c. Deciduous PINUS ELDARICA / AFGHAN PINE 40’ x 30’ at 30’ o.c. at 40’ o.c. Evergreen

LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK
SIDEWALK (5’-0” WIDE)

RAISED MEDIAN
PARKWAY (10’-0” WIDE)
SIDEWALK (5’-0” WIDE)
PARKWAY (10’-0” WIDE)
MULTIPURPOSE TRAIL (8’-0” WIDE)

BURIED UTILITY LINE
NORTH
SOUTH
130’

PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
26’
MEDIAN
52’

ROADWAY
15’
R.O.W.
52’

ROADWAY
15’
R.O.W.
45’ - 50’ (VARIES)

NEIGHBORHOOD
EDGE
45’ - 50’ (VARIES)

NEIGHBORHOOD
EDGE

EAST-WEST STREET

EDISON AVENUE

STREET TREE PLAN

STREET - CROSS SECTION

STREET - PLAN VIEW
EXHIBIT 7-10 ONTARIO RANCH ROAD STREETSCAPE
QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA / COAST LIVE OAK 40’ x 30’
473
7-40

7.12.2 Grove Avenue
Grove Avenue traverses the CenterPark Specific Plan area in a north/south direction from the south side of the major SCE power line easement located approximately 400 ft. north of Ontario Ranch Road to the midpoint of the future Grand Park located one quarter mile south of Ontario Ranch Road. The Grove Avenue streetscape will be developed in accordance with the Ontario Ranch Streetscape Master Plan 2018. The streetscape trees on Grove Avenue will be a mix of Platanus X acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’ (London Plane Tree), Pinus eldarica (Afghan Pine) and Cercis occidentali (Western Redbud). Prunus caroliniana (Carolina Laurel Cherry) and Muhlenbergia capillaris ‘Regal Mist’ (Pink Muhly) are allowable shrubs on this street.

The streetscape plan for Grove Avenue is illustrated in Exhibit 7-11, Grove Avenue Streetscape.

Improvements within the neighborhood edge of the CenterPark development may include monumentation within the landscape buffer area as shown on Exhibit 7-9, Landscape Framework Plan. 474

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-41
community design guidelines
LIMIT SIDEWPARK2 SOURAISE2 NOPARKMULTLIMIT
WEST
EAST
Plant Plane Trees (Platanus) in formal groupings (of four alternating with two African Sumacs Rhus) in west parkway. In east parkway under
2 TREE LEGEND

SIZE SPACING SPACING

SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME HEIGHT X SPREAD RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL TYPE PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA ‘BLOODGOOD’ / LONDON PLANE TREE 40’ x 30’ at 30’ o.c. at 40’ o.c. Deciduous PINUS ELDARICA / AFGHAN PINE 40’ x 30’ at 30’ o.c. at 40’ o.c. Evergreen CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS / WESTERN REDBUD 20’ x 15’ at 12’ o.c. at 15’ o.c. Deciduous

NORTH-SOUTH STREET

GROVE AVENUE

STREET TREE PLAN

LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK
PARKWAY (7'-0" WIDE)
SIDEWALK (5'-0" WIDE)
RAISED MEDIAN (28'-0" WIDE)
WEST
EAST
40’

NEIGHBORHOOD
EDGE
40’

NEIGHBORHOOD
EDGE 84’ PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
28'

ROADWAY
20'
R.O.W.
28'
20'
R.O.W.
28'

ROADWAY
MEDIAN
PARKWAY (7'-0" WIDE)
MULTIPURPOSE TRAIL (8'-0" WIDE)
SIDEWALK (5'-0" WIDE)
LANDSCAPE AREA (5'-0" WIDE)
Plant Plane Trees (Platanus) in a formal row in
west parkway. In the median, plant six Pines
alternating with five Western Redbuds.

STREET - CROSS SECTION

STREET - PLAN VIEW
EXHIBIT 7-11 GROVE AVENUE STREETSCAPE
475
7-42

7.12.3 Walker Avenue
Walker Avenue is located along the eastern boundary of the CenterPark Specific Plan area. The Walker Avenue streetscape will be developed in accordance with the Ontario Ranch Streetscape Master Plan 2018.

On Walker Avenue, Koelreuteria Bipinnata (Chinese Flame Tree) and Tristania Laurina (Water Gum) can be planted. Acceptable shrubs are Elaegnus Pungens (Silverberry) and Sesleria autumnalis (Autumn Moor Grass).

The streetscape plan for Walker Avenue is illustrated in Exhibit 7-12, Walker Avenue Streetscape.

Improvements within the neighborhood edge of the CenterPark development may include monumentation within the landscape buffer area as shown on Exhibit 7-9, Landscape Framework Plan. 476

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-43
community design guidelines
LIMIT OF WOSIDEWALK (PARKWAY (82 SOUTH- BSTRIPED ME2 NORTH- BPARKWAY (8MULTI- USE LIMIT OF WO WEST
EAST
Chinese Flame Trees (Koelreuteria) the Magnolias behind the sidewalk.parkway, and in informal drifts with are planted in a formal row in the 26 TREE LEGEND

SIZE SPACING SPACING

SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME HEIGHT X SPREAD RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL TYPE KOELREUTERIA BIPINNATA / CHINESE FLAME TREE 30’ x 30’ at 30’ O.C. at 40’ O.C. Deciduous TRISTANIA LAURINA / WATER GUM 15’ x 15’ at 15’ O.C. at 20’ O.C. Evergreen 30' NEIGHBORHOOD EDGE 30' NEIGHBORHOOD EDGE 64' COLLECTOR 12' 12' 32' ROADWAY 32' ROADWAY

LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK
PARKWAY (7'-0" WIDE)
PARKWAY (7'-0" WIDE)
SIDEWALK (5'-0" WIDE)
MULTIPURPOSE TRAIL (8'-0" WIDE)
EAST
WEST
SIDEWALK (5'-0" WIDE)

NORTH-SOUTH STREET

WALKER AVENUE

STREET TREE PLAN
Chinese Flame Trees (Koelreuteria)
are planted in a formal row in the
parkway, and in informal drifts with
the Tristanias behind the sidewalk.

STREET - CROSS SECTION

STREET - PLAN VIEW
EXHIBIT 7-12 WALKER AVENUE STREETSCAPE
477
7-44

7.12.4 Campus Avenue
Campus Avenue is located along the western boundary of the CenterPark Specific Plan area. The Campus Avenue streetscape will be developed in accordance with the Ontario Ranch Streetscape Master Plan 2018.

The streetscape trees on Campus Avenue should consist of Ulmus parvifolia ‘Drake’ (Drake Elm), Tabebuia chrysotricha (Golden Trumpet Tree) and Celtis sinensis (Chinese Hackberry). Acceptable shrubs are Cotoneaster lacteus (Cotoneaster) and Lonicera japonica (Japanese Honeysuckle).

The streetscape plan for Campus Avenue is illustrated in Exhibit 7-13, Campus Avenue Streetscape.

Improvements within the neighborhood edge of the CenterPark development may include monumentation within the landscape buffer area as shown on Exhibit 7-9, Landscape Framework Plan. 478

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-45
community design guidelines
35’

NEIGHBORHOOD
EDGE
35’

NEIGHBORHOOD
EDGE 84’ STANDARD ARTERIAL
12’ 42’ ROADWAY
ROW 23’ 12’ 14’ 12’ 23’
12’
ROW
42’ ROADWAY
WEST
EAST

STREET TREE PLANCAMPUS AVENUE
Plant ElmNeighborAfrican Sthree alo
PARKWAY (7’-0” WIDE)
PARKWAY (7’-0” WIDE)

LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK
SIDEWALK (5’-0” WIDE)
35’

NEIGHBORHOOD
EDGE
35’

NEIGHBORHOOD
EDGE 84’ MINOR ARTERIAL
42’ ROADWAY 12’
ROW
12’
ROW
42’ ROADWAY
EAST
WEST
SIDEWALK (5’-0” WIDE)
MULTIPURPOSE TRAIL (8’-0” WIDE)

STRIPED MEDIAN

TREE LEGEND

SIZE SPACING SPACING

SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME HEIGHT X SPREAD RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL TYPE CELTIS SINENSIS / CHINESE HACKBERRY 30’ x 50’ at 30’ o.c. at 30’ o.c. Deciduous ULMUS PARVIFOLIA ‘DRAKE’ / DRAKE ELM 50’ x 30’ at 25’ o.c. at 30’ o.c. Semi-Evergreen TABEBUIA CHRYSOTRICHA / GOLDEN TRUMPET TREE 15’ x 25’ at 20’ o.c. at 25’ o.c. Briefly Deciduous

NORTH-SOUTH STREET

CAMPUS AVENUE

STREET TREE PLAN
Plant Elms (Ulmus) in formal row along street
parkway. Chinese Hackberry and Golden
Trumpet Trees are planted informally in the
Neighborhood Edge behind bikeway.
18 STREET - CROSS SECTION

STREET - PLAN VIEW
EXHIBIT 7-13 CAMPUS AVENUE STREETSCAPE
479
7-46

7.12.5 Bon View Avenue
Bon View Avenue is located approximately one quarter mile east of the western boundary of the CenterPark Specific Plan area. The Bon View Avenue streetscape will be developed in accordance with the City of Ontario Master Plan of Streets and Highways.

On Bon View Avenue, Pistacia chinensis (Chinese Pistache) and Quercus agrifolia (Coast Live Oak) can be planted. Acceptable shrubs and groundcovers include Rhaphiolepis ‘Majestic Beauty’ (Majestic Beauty Indian Hawthorne) and Baccharis pilularis ‘Twin Peaks’ (Dwarf Coyote Brush).

The streetscape plan for Bon View Avenue is illustrated in Exhibit 7-14, Bon View Avenue Streetscape.

Improvements within the neighborhood edge of the CenterPark development may include monumentation within the landscape buffer area as shown on Exhibit 7-9, Landscape Framework Plan.

7.12.6 Cucamonga Avenue
Cucamonga Avenue is a local north/south street providing access to the residential neighborhoods within the western portion of the CenterPark Specific Plan area. Cucamonga Avenue terminates on a neighborhood park and provides a connection and visual access to the Grand Park. The streetscape for Cucamonga Avenue will be developed in accordance with the City of Ontario Landscape Development Standards.

The Cucamonga Avenue streetscape tree will be Tristania Laurina (Water Gum). Acceptable shrubs and groundcovers include Pittosporum tobira ‘Wheeler’s Dwarf’ (Wheeler’s Dwarf Pittosporum), Rosmarinus ‘Tuscan Blue’ (Tuscan Blue Rosemary), and those in the Salvia (Sage) and Thymus (Creeping Thyme) species.

The streetscape plan for Cucamonga Avenue is illustrated in Exhibit 7-15, Local Street Streetscape.

Improvements within the neighborhood edge may include monumentation within the landscape buffer area as shown on Exhibit 7-9, Landscape Framework Plan.
480

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-47
community design guidelines

TREE LEGEND

SIZE SPACING SPACING

SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME HEIGHT X SPREAD RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL TYPE

PISTACIA CHINENSIS / CHINESE PISTACHE

LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK
PARKWAY (8'- 0" WIDE)
PARKWAY (8'- 0" WIDE)
SIDEWALK (5'- 0" WIDE)
1 NORTH- BOUND LANES
1 SOUTH- BOUND LANES

STRIPED MEDIAN
EAST
WEST
10'

NEIGHBORHOOD
EDGE
10'

NEIGHBORHOOD
EDGE 40'

COLLECTOR
13' 13'
20'
ROAD
20'
ROAD
QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA / COAST LIVE OAK 35’ x 35’ at 30’ O.C. at 40’ O.C. Evergreen 25’ x 30’ at 30’ O.C. at 30’ O.C. Deciduous

NORTH-SOUTH STREET

BON VIEW AVENUE

STREET TREE PLAN
EAST
WEST

STREET - CROSS SECTION

STREET - PLAN VIEW
EXHIBIT 7-14 BON VIEW AVENUE STREETSCAPE
481
7-48

7.12.7 Parco Avenue
Parco Avenue is a local north/south street providing access to the residential neighborhoods within the eastern portion of the CenterPark Specific Plan area. Parco Avenue terminates on a neighborhood park and provides a connection and visual access to the Grand Park. The streetscape for Parco Avenue will be developed in accordance with the City of Ontario Landscape Development Standards.

The Parco Avenue streetscape tree will be Tristania Laurina (Water Gum). Acceptable shrubs and groundcovers include Pittosporum tobira ‘Wheeler’s Dwarf’ (Wheeler’s Dwarf Pittosporum), Rosmarinus ‘Tuscan Blue’ (Tuscan Blue Rosemary), and those in the Salvia (Sage) and Thymus (Creeping Thyme) species .

The streetscape plan for Parco Avenue is illustrated in Exhibit 7-15, Local Street Streetscape.

Improvements within the neighborhood edge may include monumentation within the landscape buffer area as shown on Exhibit 7-9, Landscape Framework Plan.

7.12.8 Grand Park Avenue
Grand Park Avenue is an internal connecting street providing primary east/west access to the residential neighborhoods within the CenterPark Specific Plan area. Grand Park Avenue is not part of the Ontario Ranch Streetscape Master Plan, however, it is an important community design element and creates a scenic drive along the north edge of the Ontario Grand Park within the Mixed-Use and residential areas of CenterPark.

It is identified as a Framework Street on Exhibit 7-9, Landscape Framework Plan. The streetscape for the Grand Park Avenue will be developed in accordance with the City of Ontario Landscape Development Standards.

7.12.9 Neighborhood Streets
Public and private neighborhood streets are utilized to provide internal circulation and connections in and between neighborhoods in the Specific Plan area. Public neighborhood streets within CenterPark will be developed in accordance with the City of Ontario Landscape Development Standards. • Local neighborhood streets unify and identify smaller neighborhoods and/or housing types within the community. Primary identifiers include a common street tree type and similar hardscape materials. • See Planning Area Lansdcape criteria (Section 6.4) for street tree designation on local neighborhood streets.
• Street trees shall be installed at 24 in. box size minimum at 30 ft. O.C. • Street trees located within 5 ft. of walks, walls, or other hardscape shall have a linear root barrier installed per manufacturer’s recommendation.
• Parkways between sidewalk and roadside curb shall be planted with low water using groundcover, turf or approved equal.
• Where a local neighborhood street exists adjacent to school property, there shall be an additional 8 ft. landscape edge provided on the school site to allow for a widened sidewalk and landscape buffer. 482

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-49
community design guidelines
Local neighborhood street streetscapes shall include the following:

1. Public and private neighborhood streets include a 12 ft. wide parkway on each side of the street within a 60 ft. ROW. A 7 ft. wide landscaped area located between the curb and a 5 ft. wide sidewalk, with upright medium-sized, evergreen or deciduous canopy trees, minimum 24-inch box size, from the approved plant list. A minimum of one tree shall be planted on or near the property line of each lot.

2. Low water groundcovers are to be used in traditional turf areas including landscaped parkways.

3. A maximum of 50% warm season turf in landscape areas, with automatic irrigation, is allowed in landscape parkway areas.

4. Shrub mass planting and vines will be planted within common 5 ft. deep lettered lots located behind the sidewalk on corner side yard conditions to help soften adjacent private yard wall.

The streetscape plan for public local neighborhood streets is illustrated in Exhibit 7-15, Neighborhood Street Streetscape.

Where interior streetscapes interface with neighborhood parks and open space, special consideration should be taken to integrate pedestrian circulation into these areas via a pedestrian walkway system that links sidewalk along streets to open space areas.

EXHIBIT 7-15 NEIGHBORHOOD STREET STREETSCAPE
(Cucamonga Avenue, Parco Avenue, Grand Park Avenue and Public and private Neighborhood Streets) Parking Permitted
Both Sides
483
7-50

7.12.10 Private Drives
Private drives provide internal circulation within the residential neighborhoods in the Specific Plan area. The streetscape design of private drives shall be consistent in character with the overall landscape framework for CenterPark to provide an attractive and safe pedestrian circulation throughout the residential areas of the Specific Plan. Private drives may be used to provide access to open space and resident parking areas and neighborhood parks.
• Landscape materials and details shall soften and enhance essential service and vehicular access, creating a utility oriented residential street type. Shrubs and vines shall be used in conjunction with screen wall and fence types to provide a cohesive circulation element for alley-loaded product types.

Private drives differ from private common drives or alleys, both in function and appearance. Private drives are utilized to provide secondary vehicular and pedestrian access within each neighborhood. They may include landscaped parkways between the vehicular paved section and the pedestrian sidewalk to allow for regularly spaced street trees to replicate the aesthetics of a neighborhood streetscape at a scale that is proportional to the higher density residential planning area with urban building setbacks. Private drives reduce the paved section along streets where no parking is allowed. Private drives within CenterPark will incorporate the following design guidelines:

The streetscape plans for private drives are illustrated in Exhibit 7-16, Private Drives Sections. 484

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-51
community design guidelines
EXHIBIT 7-16 PRIVATE DRIVES SECTIONS
485
7-52

7.12.11 Common Drives/Alleys
Common drives include through travel ways used primarily to provide access to residential parking and garages. Garages are also oriented onto dead-end travel way or alleys. Alleys do not typically include public utilities and are designed to meet minimum fire access requirements. • The intent is to provide access for vehicles and trash storage and removal in an attractive space that encourages neighbor interaction.
• The drive shall be 24 ft. where common drives provide emergency access. • Garage to garage distance shall not be less than 30 ft. • Living space facing a common drive shall allow for a minimum 5 ft. landscape setback measured from the curb or sidewalk (if any).
• Low patio walls shall allow for a minimum 3 ft. landscape setback measured from the curb or sidewalk (if any).

Common drives streetscapes shall include the following:

1. Common drives provide internal circulation and access to open parking and residential garages.

Enhanced cross walks are encouraged at private drives where they intersect with public or private streets.

2. Where garages are oriented onto common drives, a landscaped planting area between garage driveways will be planted with upright shrubs, vines espaliers and/or groundcover plant material from the approved plant list. These areas will include automatic sprinklers.

3. Informal tree planting, groups of two or more, is encouraged adjacent to parks, common open space areas, and SCE easements. The minimum average requirement is one tree per 25 ft.

4. Parking along private drives shall include one 8 ft. wide planter island for every 8 adjacent parking stalls.
486

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-53
community design guidelines
EXHIBIT 7-17 PRIVATE DRIVE PARKING
Diagonal parking along open space
Minimum travel lanes on private drives and through private driveways/alleys shall be a minimum of 24 ft. wide. Additional paved width may be be required if there are public utilities within the private drive.

Parallel parking is not allowed on private drives less than 32 ft. wide. Diagonal and perpendicular parking stalls may be permitted on one or both sides of private drives as shown in Exhibit 7-17, Private Drive Parking.
487
7-54
Alleys are typically dead-end private travel ways fronted by residential parking and garages. Private driveways streetscapes shall include the following:

1. Common drives and alleys are designed to provide safe and attractive access to residential garages, driveways, and parking spaces. Typical alleys are not through-streets and are intended to be pedestrian-friendly with low traffic volumes. Private drives consist of a 20 ft. wide paved section with rolled curbs. Buildings and garages facing each other are a minimum of 30 ft. apart. The areas on each side of the alley may be private front yards, parking spaces for residents and guests or access to garages. Landscaping in these areas will be installed by the builder and maintained by a homeowners association. These areas will include automatic sprinklers.

2. Where garages are oriented onto common drives and alleys, a landscaped planting area between the garage driveways will be planted with upright shrubs, vines espaliers and/or groundcover plant material from the approved plant list.

The streetscape plan for alleys is illustrated in Exhibit 7-18, Common Drives/Alleys. 488

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-55
community design guidelines
EXHIBIT 7-19 ENHANCED DRIVEWAY/COMMON DRIVES AND ALLEY PAVING DETAIL Non-through common drives and alleys, which function primarily to provide access to garages within single-family detached neighborhoods, including cluster, courtyard and detached cottage home types, shall utilize enhanced paving materials such as concrete pavers, scored or colored concrete, stonework or other decorative hardscape approved by the City Planning Department.

The enhanced paving shall be designed to accommodate vehicular access to the garages and pedestrian access from sidewalks and walkways to front entry doors. See Exhibit 7-19, Enhanced Driveway/Common Drives and Alley Paving Detail.

EXHIBIT 7-18 COMMON DRIVES/ALLEYS
4’ decorative concrete border/
pedestrian lane
489
7-56

7.13 ENTRIES AND MONUMENTATION
Community monumentation is an important community design element used to identify one’s arrival at CenterPark and to establish the sense of place for the overall community. Community entries are proposed at the perimeter of the Specific Plan area along framework streets. These Community entry monuments are designed to establish a strong hierarchy of scale. They may be incorporated into the landscape plans for individual planning areas to identify attached residential and multi-family neighborhoods, neighborhood parks and open space amenities within the community. These monument elements are to be designed with durable, lasting materials approved by the City of Ontario. Placement of the monumentation shall be in accordance with line-of-sight requirements and outside of the public right-of-way.

Community entry monuments are located at the western edge of the Specific Plan area at the intersection of Ontario Ranch Road and Campus Avenue, at the northern Specific Plan boundary at Grove Avenue, at the northwest corner of the intersection of Ontario Ranch Road and Parco Avenue. These monuments announcing the arrival into the community of CenterPark, will reflect a transitional interpretation of the historical rural character of the area and reinforce the architectural theme established for the CenterPark Community to create a harmonious, identifiable and aesthetic arrival statement.

The community monuments establish an asymmetrical character, with the primary monument feature located on the right side of the street within a landscaped backdrop. A smaller monument feature on the left side of the roadway provides an offsetting balance. Serpentine stucco walls and formalized planting offset an arrangement of simple spheres creating a three dimension sculpture that is visually interesting at the pedestrian and vehicular level.

The Community monumentation features are illustrated in Exhibit 7-9, Landscape Framework Plan. 490

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-57
community design guidelines

7.13.1 Community Entry and Monumentation
The community monumentation shall include the following:

1. A horizontally proportioned monument sign (6-8 ft. maximum height) with enhanced horizontal cladding and community identification, will be located within the landscape lot adjacent to the ROW at the following locations:
a. Northeast and southeast corner of Ontario Ranch Road and Campus Avenue. b. East and west side of Grove Avenue at the south edge of the SCE easement north of Ontario Ranch Road.
c. Northwest corner of the intersection of Ontario Ranch Road and Parco Avenue. d. Southwest corner of the intersection of Ontario Ranch Road and Walker Avenue.

2. Conceptual monumentation shown in the Specifc Plan depicts stucco with treated or simulated wood accent material. Stucco and simulated wood are sustainable materials. Stucco has been used as the primary material for exterior building surfaces in modern construction for this reason. The design and the material depicted reinforce the vision for the CenterPark master planned community, reflecting the relationship between the built environment and the natural landscape found in urban parks. Other enhanced or decorative materials that reinforce the overall community character for CenterPark are acceptable and may be allowed as part of development plan approval.

Other acceptable sustainable materials for entry and community monuments include formed concrete, stone or tile cladding in a horizontal design pattern. Other accent materials include simulated or treated rusticated metal panels and durable extruded materials in accent colors. Signage lettering may be raised or back-lit.

3. Project logo with fabricated lettering mounted on a raised background panel.

4. A minimum of three (3) large multi-trunk specimen trees will be planted to frame each community monument. Specimen trees to be minimum 48-inch box size.

5. Evergreen shrubs and hardy perennial flowers to be used in a formal planting design as a foreground treatment. Planting at community monuments will provide a layering of ornamental shrubs and drought tolerant groundcover.

6. Accent lighting of landscape/monumentation will be low voltage LED lighting. Allowable lighting at community entries includes, but is not limited to, pathway lighting, up-lighting at walls and selected/focal trees and indirect or back-lighting of signage areas. Final landscape lighting design will be reviewed by the City as part of development plan approval.

The Community monumentation features are illustrated in Exhibit 7-9, Landscape Framework Plan and Exhibit 7-20 and 7-21, Community Monumentation.
491
7-58
EXHIBIT 7-20 COMMUNITY MONUMENTATION (LEFT SIDE)

GROVE AVE OR ONTARIO RANCH RD
492

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-59
community design guidelines
EXHIBIT 7-21 COMMUNITY MONUMENTATION (RIGHT SIDE)

GROVE AVE OR ONTARIO RANCH RD
493
7-60

7.13.2 Mixed-Use Intersection Monumentation and Signage Community monuments are allowed within the neighborhood edge at the intersection of Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue, at the “center” of the Mixed-Use portion of the Specific Plan area. These monuments/signage reinforce the overall character of the community of CenterPark and will reflect a transitional interpretation of the historical rural character of the area. The monuments create a harmonious, identifiable community character along these major intersecting framework streets.

The monument wall establishes a recognizable landscape/hardscape character, with single simple spheres creating a sculptural focal element that is visually interesting at the pedestrian and vehicular level. The monument wall provides space for project and tenant signage in accordance with the City of Ontario signage ordinance.

Thematic intersection monumentation and signage shall include the following:

1. A horizontally proportioned sign wall (4 to 5.5 ft. maximum height) with community identification, will be located within the landscape lot adjacent to the ROW at any of the four corners of the intersection of Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue.

2. Primary material may include split-face or stucco. Other acceptable sustainable materials include formed concrete, stone or tile cladding in a horizontal design pattern.

3. Project logo with fabricated lettering mounted on a raised background panel.

4. Large multi- or single-trunk trees, minimum size is 36-inch box size, will be planted to anchor each monument/signage wall with background landscaping. A minimum of two trees will be planted to frame each monument.

5. Evergreen shrubs and hardy perennial flowers to be used as an accent and foreground treatment.

Planting will provide a layering of ornamental shrubs and drought-tolerant groundcover. Seasonal perennial flowering may be planted to allow for seasonal flowering interest throughout the year.

6. Accent lighting will be low voltage LED lighting. Allowable lighting at community entries includes, but is not limited to, pathway lighting, up-lighting at walls and selected/focal trees and indirect or back-lighting of signage areas. Final landscape lighting design will be reviewed by the City as part of development plan approval.

Intersection monumentation and signage for the Mixed Used area of CenterPark is illustrated in Exhibit 7-9, Landscape Framework Plan and Exhibit 7-22, Mixed-Use Intersection Monumentation and Signage.
494

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-61
community design guidelines
EXHIBIT 7-22 MIXED USE INTERSECTION MONUMENTATION AND SIGNAGE 495
7-62
Attached residential and multi-family developments within the residential neighborhoods may identify their individual project character with entry and directional signage that complements and reinforces the overall community character and utilizes the basic design features of the other monuments within CenterPark.

The design of neighborhood entry monumentation shall include the following:

1. Primary material may include split-face or stucco with treated or simulated wood accent material.

Other acceptable sustainable material include formed concrete, stone or tile cladding in a horizontal design pattern.

2. Community identification with fabricated steel lettering.

3. Neighborhood monuments may be integrated/attached to the perimeter community wall. Refer to Exhibit 7-26, Wall and Fence Details for community wall and fence design details.

4. One or more medium sized evergreen specimen tree, minimum size is 36 ft. box size, will be planted to anchor each neighborhood entry.

5. Evergreen shrubs and hardy perennial flowers to be used as an accent and foreground treatment.

Planting at neighborhood entry monuments will provide a layering of ornamental shrubs and drought-tolerant groundcover. Seasonal perennial flowering may be planted to allow for seasonal flowering interest throughout the year.

6. Accent lighting of landscape/monumentation will be low voltage LED lighting. 496

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-63
community design guidelines

7.14 PARKS, PASEOS, AND PRIVATE RECREATION AREAS
Residential neighborhoods in the community will provide parks and open space to meet the City of Ontario’s requirements and provide safe and attractive open space areas with amenities designed and implemented to provide for recreation, public gatherings and leisure activities for the future residents of CenterPark. The parks and open space concept for CenterPark is to provide a variety of neighborhood parks within each residential planning area within the Specific Plan.

Future residential developments may contain private recreation areas within the neighborhood parks and/or pocket parks. All open space areas, including parks and paseos, will provide opportunities for community interaction and recreation while reinforcing neighborhood and community character consistent with these Design Guidelines.

Common open space shall be designed to create areas that utilize trees, landscaping, and recreational facilities. They shall incorporate landscape planters, pathways, benches, gazebos, raised planters, and other unique features. Features may include permanent play areas and include amenities such as permanent table tennis, bocce ball, bags (corn hole), shade structures, fire pits, and BBQs that encourage spaces for family gatherings and games. Play equipment shall consider unique elements such as nature play, splash pads, or other interactive features other than traditional play equipment.

7.14.1 City of Ontario Grand Park
The CenterPark Specific Plan includes 55.98 acres designated for the Grand Park, a regional park intended to serve not only the residents of CenterPark, but the surrounding City residents and visitors from the surrounding region drawn. The City’s vision for the Grand Park has been outlined in The Ontario Grand Park Conceptual Master Plan. All future improvements within the Grand Park including monumentation, signage, trails, landscaping, etc. shall be designed to be consistent with the Ontario Grand Park Conceptual Master Plan to ensure a consistent implementation of the City’s vision.

Improvements within Grand Park shall be approved as part of the development plan for the adjacent residential or mixed-use planning area. Park improvements shall be constructed concurrently with the development of the adjacent residential or mixed-use planning area. 497
7-64

7.14.2 Neighborhood Parks
Residential neighborhoods within the CenterPark Specific Plan will provide a minimum of two acres of parks on-site. Park areas with a minimum size of one quarter acre and a minimum dimension of 30 ft. contribute toward this on-site requirement. Neighborhood parks may be located between residential neighborhoods as a shared recreational and gathering space.

Centrally located and visibly prominent, neighborhood parks, a minimum of one-half to three quarter acre in size, are encouraged within CenterPark. Neighborhood parks will be included as a focal design element within the residential neighborhoods within the Specific Plan area with major active and passive recreational amenities. More intimate scaled local parks with active or passive recreational amenities may be proposed to meet the park requirements. Neighborhood parks shall be designed according to the following Guidelines:

1. Neighborhood park facilities, including buildings, landscape/shade structures, hardscape improvements, water features, seating/benches, street furnishings, signage and lighting features, etc. should be designed to reinforce the community character of CenterPark.

2. Neighborhood parks should be designed to be visible from surrounding streets and common areas to provide a safe and defensible area for outdoor activities.

3. Landscaping should complement the surrounding streetscapes utilizing trees, shrubs and groundcovers identified in the plant matrix. Large specimen trees should be used within the open turf areas to help provide shade and to frame background views. Accent trees should also be used at pedestrian entries.

4. Neighborhood parks over one-half acre in size, should include large turf play areas suitable as informal play fields and large gathering areas. Warm season turf is recommended for open spaces where turf provides a playing surface.

5. Neighborhood parks should provide both active and passive amenities and facilities for the use and enjoyment of future residents and visitors.

6. A minimum of 50% of the barbecue and picnic facilities provided should be located adjacent to a walkway system for ADA accessibility.

7. Enhanced paving should be encouraged where pedestrian circulation crosses roadways in appropriate locations and as approved by the City of Ontario. Enhanced paving is not required within public right-of-ways. Enhanced crossing should be located at corner/intersection locations or at controlled locations.

8. Trash receptacles will be provided at seating areas. Doggie bag stations will be located at each neighborhood park over one-half acre in size.

9. Bike racks will be provided at tot lot facilities/play equipment and may also be provided at other suitable locations.

Exhibit 7-23 Conceptual Neighborhood Park shows an illustrative example of a neighborhood park within the CenterPark Specific Plan.
498

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-65
community design guidelines
EXHIBIT 7-23 CONCEPTUAL NEIGHBORHOOD PARK

MINOR AMENITY -

FOCAL GARDEN
2 MINOR AMENITIES -

MULTIPLE TOT LOTS

MAJOR AMENITY - COMMUNITY POOL

MAJOR AMENITY - CLUBHOUSE -
MIN 1,250 S.F.

MINOR AMENITY - LAWN
GAME AREA > 500 S.F.

MINOR AMENITIES -

TOT LOT
2 MAJOR AMENITIES - PICKLE

BALL COURTS (UNLIGHTED)

MINOR AMENITY - GREENBELT
WITH PASEO > 30’ WIDE
MAJOR AMENITY - ACTIVE LAWN > .5 ACRES
Neighborhood Park shown for typical blended neighborhoods of 351 to 400 DU 499
7-66

7.14.3 Local Parks
Local parks are encouraged within residential neighborhoods in CenterPark, while neighborhood pocket parks should be designed to enhance neighborhood vistas/visual terminus points and other visually prominent areas. Local parks are intended to provide additional amenities within a short walking distance of the surrounding homes and should be designed with strong neighborhood “eyes-on” approach.

Pocket parks shall be designed according to the following Guidelines:

1. Local parks should be designed to reinforce the community character of CenterPark.

2. Local parks should be designed to be visible from surrounding streets and common areas to provide a safe and defensible area for outdoor activities.

3. Landscaping should complement the surrounding streetscapes utilizing trees, shrubs and groundcovers identified in the plant matrix. Larger trees should be used within local parks to help provide shade and to screen gathering and activity areas. Accent trees should also be used at pedestrian entries.

4. Local parks may include small scale active and/or passive amenities for the use and enjoyment of future residents and visitors. Local parks may include smaller turf areas suitable for informal play and picnicking. Warm season turf is recommended for open spaces where turf provides a playing surface.

5. Shaded seating areas are encouraged. Trash receptacles will be provided at seating areas.

6. Paseos should provide strong connections between neighborhoods within CenterPark and should provide an extension of the public and private sidewalks. All paseo walkways will be ADA accessible.

7. Bike racks will be provided at tot lot facilities/play equipment.

Exhibit 7-24, Illustrative Local Park shows an example of a park within a residential neighborhood. 500

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-67
community design guidelines
EXHIBIT 7-24 ILLUSTRATIVE LOCAL PARK
MAJOR AMENITY - ACTIVE LAWN > .5 ACRES

MINOR AMENITY - SHADE STRUCTURE
MINOR AMENITY - GREENBELT WITH PASEO > 30’ WIDE

MINOR AMENITY - FOCAL GARDEN
Local Park shown for typical 100 - neighborhood less than 200 DU 501
7-68

7.14.4 Landscape Design
The Mixed-Use area of the CenterPark Specific Plan will be developed both architecturally and through landscape treatments to create a distinct community character and to ensure a cohesive aesthetic with the residential areas of the Specific Plan. The land plan encourages integration of the residential and mixed-use areas by providing for a consistent landscape treatments along the frontage on Grove Avenue and Ontario Ranch Road, while also incorporating a major gateway monument.

7.14.4.1 Minimum Landscape Requirements

1. Builder/developer shall refer to City of Ontario standards for the percentage of gross commercial site acreage required to be landscaped.

2. All areas of the site not occupied by buildings, parking or otherwise utilized shall be landscaped with groundcover, turf or tree materials from the community plant list.

3. Appropriate street trees should be utilized adjacent to street frontage integrating the site into the overall community setting.

4. Side yard and rear service yard use areas should be screened with a combination of a 6 ft. wall and dense landscape buffer. Tubular steel fencing and gates should be used adjacent to interior residential streets to control access points.

5. Accent tree entry planting should be incorporated at the site’s vehicular access points.

6. No shrubs higher than 3 ft. and no tree canopy lower than 7 ft. as to allow officers on patrol the ability to view the business.

7. Plants by low-lying windows may have thorns as a deterrent. 502

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-69
community design guidelines
Parking Areas
• Where a parking lot contains 10 or more parking spaces and is visible from a street, no less than 10% of the total area (excluding any perimeter landscaping) shall be landscaped. Such landscaping shall not be concentrated in any one location. A minimum of 50% of the plant material shall be canopy or shade trees and shrubs shall be 3 ft. high or less to provide clear visibility. • All rows of parking spaces shall be provided with landscape islands at each row terminus to protect parked vehicles, ensure visibility, confine moving traffic to drive aisles and driveways, and provide space for landscaping. Within each row of parking spaces, landscape islands shall be placed one for every 10 spaces a single row and one for every 5 spaces double row to prevent more than 10 vehicles from being parked side-by-side in an abutting configuration. These landscape islands shall measure a minimum of 5 ft. in width, exclusive of curbs. Creation of large planting islands (tree groves) are encouraged as opposed to small pockets of individual trees. • Planter islands for a single row of parking spaces shall be landscaped with at least 1 tree for every 4 spaces and vegetative groundcover or turf. Planter islands for a double row of parking spaces shall contain not less than 2 trees and vegetative groundcover or turf. • Landscaped areas shall be delineated with a concrete curb which may have curb cuts to facilitate sheet flow runoff from parking lots to infiltrate the landscape planters. • Parking area landscaping is required for the screening of large parking areas to limit their visual impact.
• When parking is located adjacent to a public street or interior residential street, a combination of landscaped berms and/or planting totaling 3 ft. high is to be used to screen views of parked cars. • Wherever possible, pedestrian traffic should be separated from vehicular traffic by additional sidewalks. The parking lot should have crosswalks highlighted with decorative or varied texture paving.
503
7-70

7.14.4.2 Landscape and Open Space Design
Landscaping
Landscaping helps to soften the feel of the buildings and parking lot, while enhancing the visual aspect of the site. The following landscaping techniques may be used:
• Provide special landscaping treatment at all project and building entries. • Provide shade/canopy trees within parking areas.
• Use plants to define outdoor spaces such as along edges, outdoor plazas, or pathways between parking and building entrances.
• Plantings shall provide a continuity of form across the entire project.

Site Accessories
Site accessories, such as recycling bins, bike racks, litter cans, planters, benches and transit shelters, should use materials and have an architectural character consistent with the overall project. These accessories should be graffiti-resistant with materials that are easy to clean and paint.

Connecting Walkways
Walkways within commercial and/or office areas of the Specific Plan shall connect the various buildings to each other and to the sidewalks along adjacent arterials. Use of trellises, landscaping, seating areas and building placement adjacent to one another will encourage pedestrian activity within retail areas.

A typical walkway shall be a minimum of 6ft. wide. In large parking lots, pedestrian walkways shall be provided within the median of at least 1 parking aisle for 8 aisles of 20 stalls or more.

Pedestrian walkways that may also be used for emergency access must allow minimum clearance of 26 ft. wide and 14 ft. vertical clearance. Off-site connections shall be provided from the neighborhood center to CenterPark’s residential development.
504

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-71
community design guidelines
Outdoor Storage Areas
Outdoor storage areas should be incorporated into the design of a project to avoid visual impacts on the site. Outdoor storage areas shall be located away from the street, behind or to the side of buildings. Walls and landscaping shall be used to screen stored materials. Materials placed in front of buildings are not permitted.

Transit Shelters
Transit shelters should be incorporated into the design of neighborhood center. The design of transit related structures shall be integrated architecturally with the project through its color, materials and architectural style. Walkways shall be provided for easy accessibility by pedestrians moving to and from transit stops to the neighborhood center.

Fence and Wall Design
Except for security fencing adjacent to the SCE easements, chain-link fencing, barbed wire, corrugated metal fencing and tennis windscreens are not permitted. Fences and walls should be built with attractive, durable materials, including (but not limited to) wrought iron, textured concrete block, or formed concrete with reveals. Fences or walls should be consistent with architectural style, materials and designs used throughout the CenterPark Specific Plan.

Perimeter walls and fences constructed for commercial and office developments adjacent to residential areas within the Mixed-Used District shall not exceed a maximum height of 6 ft. unless required for noise attenuation or visual screening and approved by the Planning Director.

Walls over 6 ft. tall shall be of enhanced material/finish such as textured block/block patterns, textured or sculpted concrete walls or of similar enhancement.

Along streets of the CenterPark Specific Plan, walls and fences should not exceed 36 inches in height and avoid long expanses of uninterrupted fences and walls. The use of openings, planter boxes, material changes, pilasters or posts are acceptable. Openings shall be provided to connect walkways directly to the street avoiding long, inconvenient walking paths. These pedestrian portals should be announced by pilasters, trellis, special landscaping, or other features.

Lighting
On-site lighting standards shall provide adequate illumination throughout the site during the nighttime hours. Lighting fixtures shall be designed to be compatible with the architectural styles selected for the project. All light standards should have an attractive base and top.

Along pedestrian walks, lighting fixtures should not exceed 12 ft. in height and may include lighting within bollards. Pedestrian lighting shall provide appropriate illumination at a human scale without too much glare. Lighting structures within larger parking lots shall not exceed 25 ft. in height, providing enough visibility for customers and employees to walk safely to their vehicles. The same bulb type shall be used for all parking lot and pedestrian lighting fixtures within the development. Service area lighting should be positioned, so no bulbs can be seen from public view. All street lights within the public right-of-way shall be constructed per City standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 505
7-72

7.15 COMMUNITY WALLS AND FENCING

7.15.1 Community Walls
Community walls within CenterPark create a cohesive element of the overall landscape character for the Specific Plan area. Community walls shall be consistent with these Design Guidelines and the requirements of the City of Ontario. Community walls shall be a maximum of 6 ft. in height, unless required to be higher for sound attenuation or grading. Maximum exposed retaining walls supporting community walls and/or sound walls shall not exceed 9 ft. in height.

Community walls shall be built with attractive and durable materials. They shall be decorative in nature and incorporate decorative caps and the use of pilasters to help enhance the character of the community.

Decorative accent pilasters will be spaced an average of 250 ft. apart along Ontario Ranch Road and Grove Avenue, and every 150 ft. apart along “A” and “B” Streets. Community walls will be incorporated into the landscape treatment. Community walls and fences within CenterPark are illustrated in Exhibit 7-25, Community Wall and Fence Plan. Community walls and fences within CenterPark shall conform to the design details in Exhibit 7-26, Wall and Fence Details.

7.15.2 Solid Walls and Fencing
All perimeter walls, corner walls, or other wall locations that are visible from public view will be constructed of decorative split-face with pilasters at the entries and wall transitions. The wall color should complement the community detail and other landscape treatments within CenterPark. Interior walls and fencing will harmonize with the perimeter community walls color schemes and will reinforce the architectural character utilized by the builder in each neighborhood. Perimeter walls shall be at a maximum of 6 ft. in height, unless required to be higher for sound attenuation or grading. Maximum exposed retaining walls supporting perimeter walls and/or sound walls shall not exceed 9 ft. in height. Solid walls and fencing shall conform to the design details in Exhibit 7-26.

Secondary walls and walls that are not visible from public view shall be of colored precision block.

Secondary wall colors should complement the color of the community walls in the public view.

Neighborhood block walls at property lines and side yard return walls/fences shall be 6 ft. in height. Where conditions require a retaining wall supporting a secondary wall, the exposed side of the wall shall not exceed 9 ft. in height. Fences may be used as an alternative to secondary walls along interior private side and rear yards and on lateral fencing conditions between the side property line and the building wall. Fences shall be of manufactured white vinyl materials. Other materials are subject to the approval of the City of Ontario.

7.15.3 Open View Fencing
If applicable, open fences may be located in the rear yards of those properties abutting open space areas, parks and other attractive views or vistas. Open view fences shall be designed to be a cohesive landscape design element. View fencing shall be of tubular steel and shall conform to the design details in Exhibit 7-26. Areas where open fencing occurs will be subject to approval by the City of Ontario.
506

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-73
community design guidelines Eucalyptus Ave
Campus Ave
Ontario Ranch Rd/
Edison Ave
Cucamonga Ave
Sultana Ave
Bon View Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Campus Ave
Bon View Ave
Cucamonga Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Baker Ave Baker Ave
Sultana Ave
Ontario Ranch Rd/
Edison Ave
1 2
3 4
5 6
10 11
7 8
9 12
13 14
15 16
18 17
19 20
21 22
MDR Medium Density Residential
MU Mixed-Use
OS-R Open Space-Recreation
OS-NR Open Space-Non Rec

FULL ACCESS

POTENTIAL ACCESS POINT
EXHIBIT 7-25 COMMUNITY WALL AND FENCE PLAN

COMMUNITY THEME

WALL AND PILASTER

TUBULAR STEEL VIEW

FENCING
507
7-74
EXHIBIT 7-26 WALL AND FENCE DETAILS
NOTE: Walls may exceed six ft. in height and pilasters may exceed six ft. six in. in height only for noise attenuation purposes subject to an Acoustical Study and Planning Department approval. 508

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-75
community design guidelines

7.16 OUTDOOR LIGHTING
Lighting standards within CenterPark shall be consistent in style, color and materials to be a cohesive landscape design element. A hierarchy of scale shall be established by using a variety of lighting fixtures and illumination levels based off of lighting design intent. Lighting styles shall tie into architectural styles and provide sufficient illumination for safety within the community.

Preservation of “Night-Sky” should be considered in lighting design layout and fixture selection. The use of “cut-off” or louvered lamps, to preserve ambiance of “Night-Sky”, is highly encouraged. Light fixture locations should be designed so that light sources are not visible to pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Frosted, louvered or prismatic lens should be considered where decorative lighting fixtures are visible and part of the aesthetic lighting program.

7.17 COMMUNITY PLANT PALETTE

7.17.1 Plant Matrix
Plant material within CenterPark should be selected from the following list of trees, shrubs, groundcovers, and vines that support the overall landscape theme for the community. Refer to the following selection of plant material, Tables 7-1A, 7-1B and 7-1C, Plant Matrix.

A landscape hierarchy of scale is an important design attribute of the trees included on the Plant Matrix.

The trees listed on the matrix have been defined relative to their height and width at maturity and their appropriate use within buffers, common areas and/or parks. This is identified in the comment column of Tables 7-1A, 7-1B and 7-1C. Palm trees with a growth habit and scale that are appropriate for the intended lands use are also identified in the matrix.

Plants that are not on the Community Plant Matrix, but suitable for the area and harmonious with the overall community character for CenterPark, may be allowed subject to approval of the City of Ontario.

7.17.2 Prohibited Plant Material
A list of plant material that is not suitable within CenterPark is included after the Plant Matrix. Plant material on this list include invasive plant material and plants which are not permitted in high fire areas or fuel modification zones. Refer to Table 7-2, Prohibited Plant List. 509
7-76

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
7-77
community design guidelines

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME

ONTARIO RANCH ROAD AVENUE (PER TOP STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN) GROVE AVENUE (PER TOP STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN) CAMPUS AVENUE (PER TOP STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN) WALKER AVENUE (PER TOP STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN) BON VIEW AVENUE PARCO AVENUE / COMET AVENUE CUCAMONGA AVENUE GRAND PARK AVENUE PUBLIC/LOCAL NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS COMMUNITY ENTRIES AND MONUMENTATION MIXED USE MONUMENTATION GRAND PARK MONUMENTATION NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS LOCAL PARKS SHRUBS
Anigozanthus spp. and hybrids Kangaroo Paw ●●●●●
Baccharis 'Centennial' Coyote Bush ● ●
Buxus spp. Boxwood ●●●●●
Buxus microphylla Japanese Boxwood ●●●●●
Carissa spp. Natal Plum ●●●●●
Ceanothus spp. California Wild Lilac ●●●●●
Convolvulus cneorum Bush Morning Glory ●●●
Coprosma repens Mirror Plant ●●●●●
Cotoneaster lacteus Cotoneaster ●
Dodonaea viscosa ‘Purpurea’ Purple Hopseed Bush ● ●
Elaeagnus pungens Silverberry ●
Hemerocallis hybrids Daylily ●●●
Ilex aquifolium English Holly ● ●
Ilex cornuta ‘Burfordii’ Burford Holly ● ●
Ilex vomitoria Yaupon ● ●
Ilex vomitoria ‘Nana’ Dwarf Yaupon ● ●
Kniphopia hybrids Red-Hot Poker ●●●
Laurus nobilis Sweet Bay ● ●
Leymus condensatus ‘Canyon Prince’ Canyon Prince Wild Rye Grass ● ● Muhlenbergia capillaris ‘Regal Mist’ Pink Muhly ● ●●●●● Muhlenbergia rigens Deer Grass ●●●●●
Myrtus communis Myrtle ● ●
Myrtus communis 'Compacta' Dwarf Myrtle ● ● ●
Nandina domestica Heavenly Bamboo ● ●
Nandina domestica ‘Compacta’ ●●●●●
Photinia x fraseri Photinia ●●●●●
Pittosporum tenuifolium ‘Silver Sheen’ Silver Sheen Kohuhu ● ● Pittosporum tobira ‘Variegata’ ● ●
Pittosporum tobira ‘Wheeler’s Dwarf’ Wheeler’s Dwarf Pittosporum ●●●●●●●●● Podocarpus spp. ●●●●●
Prunus caroliniana Carolina Laurel Cherry ● ● ●
Prunus caroliniana ‘Bright & Tight’ ● ●
Prunus caroliniana ‘Compacta’ ● ●
Prunus ilicifolia Hollyleaf Cherry ● ●
Rhamnus californica Coffeeberry ● ●
Rhamnus ‘Eve Case’ Coffeeberry ● ●
Rhaphiolepis ‘Majestic Beauty’ Indian Hawthorne ● ●●●●● Rhus integrifolia Lemonade Berry ● ●
Rhus ovata Sugar Bush ● ●
Rosa ‘Pink Iceberg’ Pink Iceberg Rose ●
Rosmarinus officinalis and hybrids Rosemary ● ●
Rosmarinus ‘Tuscan Blue’ ●●●●●●●●●
Salvia spp. Sage ●●●●●
Viburnum tinus 'Spring Bouquet' Spring Boquet Laurustinus ● Westringia fruticosa Coast Rosemary ●●●●●
Westringia ‘Wynabbie Gem’ Hybrid Australian Rosemary ●●●●● Xylosma congestum ‘Compacta’ Compact Xylosma ● ●
TABLE 7-1B PLANT MATRIX - SHRUBS
511
7-78

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME

GROUNDCOVERS
Achillea spp. Yarrow ● ●●●●●
Agrostis pallens San Diego Bent Grass ● ●
Anigozanthos spp. and hybrids Kangaroo Paws ●●●●●
Armeria maritime Pink Thrift ●●●●●
Baccharis pilularis 'Twin Peaks' Dwarf Coyote Brush ● ●●●●● Bulbine frutescens Bulbine ● ●
Carex pansa California Meadow Sedge ● ●
Ceanothus griseus"horizontalis" Carmel Ceanothus ●●●●●●● Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue ● ●
Fragaria chiloensis Beach Strawberry ● ●
Gaura lindheimeri ‘Siskiyou Pink’ ●●●●●
Gazania hybrid ‘Mitsuwa’ Mitsuwa Clumping Gazania ● ●
Lonicera japonica Japanese Honeysuckle ●
Nandina domestica ‘Nana’ ● ●●●●●
Rosmarinus officinalis ‘Ken Taylor’ ● ●
Rosmarinus officinalis ‘Prostratus’ Dwarf Rosemary ●●●●● Salvia spp. Sage ●●●●●●●●●
Sesleria autumnalis Autumn Moor Grass ● ●●●●●
Thymus spp. Creeping Thyme ●●●●●●●●●
Trachelospermum jasminoides Star Jasmine ● ●

VINES/ESPALIER
Hardenbergia violacea Lilac Vine ● ●
Lonicera spp. Honeysuckle ● ●
Rosa spp. Climbing Rose ● ●
Trachelospermum jasminoides Star Jasmine ● ●

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME

PROHIBITED PLANT LIST
Ailanthus altissima Tree-of-Heaven
Arundo donax Giant Reed
Elaeagnus angustifolia Russian Olive
Carpobrotus edulis Iceplant
Cortaderia jubata Purple Pampas Grass
Cortaderia selloana Pampas Grass
Hedera helix English Ivy
Nerium spp. Oleander
Romulea rosea Onion Grass
Sesbania punicea Red sesbania
Vinca major Big Periwinkle
Washingtonia robusta Mexican Fan Palm
TABLE 7-1C PLANT MATRIX - GROUNDCOVERS AND VINES/ESPALIER TABLE 7-2 PROHIBITED PLANT LIST
512

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
8-1
implementation
SECTION 8: IMPLEMENTATION
The City of Ontario will adopt the CenterPark Specific Plan by ordinance. Following approval by the City, the CenterPark Specific Plan will serve as the implementation tool for the General Plan as well as the zoning for the Specific Plan area. Concurrently with the adoption of the Specific Plan, the City of Ontario will approve tentative tract maps establishing legal residential lots within the CenterPark Specific Plan area.

8.1 METHODS AND INTERPRETATION
Development within the CenterPark Specific Plan shall be implemented through the City approval of tentative and final tract maps and through the Development Plan Review process as established in the City of Ontario Development Code. The implementation process described herein provides the mechanisms for review and approval of development projects within CenterPark.

8.2 APPLICABILITY
All development proposals within the CenterPark Specific Plan shall be subject to the implementation procedures established herein. Whenever the provisions and development standards contained herein conflict with those contained in the City of Ontario Development Code, the provisions of the Specific Plan shall take precedence. In instances where the Specific Plan is silent, the City of Ontario Development Code shall prevail.

8.3 INTERPRETATION
Unless otherwise provided, any ambiguity concerning the content or application of the CenterPark Specific Plan shall be resolved by the City of Ontario Planning Director, or designee, in a manner consistent with the goals, policies, purpose and intent established in this Specific Plan.

8.4 SEVERABILITY
If any portion of these regulations is declared to be invalid or ineffective in whole or in part, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. The legislative body hereby declares that they would have enacted these regulations and each portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more portions be declared invalid or ineffective.

8.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF DESIGN GUIDELINES
Adoption of the CenterPark Specific Plan by the City includes adoption of the Design Guidelines contained herein, which shall be the design criteria by which development within the Specific Plan shall be reviewed during Development Plan Review. The Design Guidelines are intended to be flexible in nature while establishing basic evaluation criteria for development projects as part of Development Plan Review. Any major deviation from the Design Guidelines shall require approval by the Planning Commission. The determination of a major deviation from the Design Guidelines shall be made by the Planning Director. 513
8-2

8.6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS

8.6.1 Subdivision Maps
Approval of tentative subdivision maps may occur concurrently with the adoption of the CenterPark Specific Plan. All tentative and final subdivision maps shall be reviewed and approved pursuant to applicable provisions of the City of Ontario Subdivision Ordinance and consistent with the applicable provisions of the Land Use Plan, Infrastructure, Design Guidelines, and Development Regulations adopted as part of the Specific Plan.

8.6.2 Development Plan
All development projects within CenterPark shall be subject to the Development Plan Review process as established in the City’s Development Code. Pursuant to these provisions, Development Plan Review constitutes a design review of project architecture, site plans and landscape plans. Adoption of the CenterPark Specific Plan by the City includes adoption of the Design Guidelines contained within the Specific Plan, which provide direction for the design of development projects within CenterPark. Where the Specific Plan development regulations and Design Guidelines are silent, the applicable development regulations and Design Guidelines contained within the City’s Development Code shall apply. The Design Guidelines are intended to be flexible in nature while establishing basic evaluation criteria for the review of development projects by the City. All development project applications shall include a landscape and irrigation plan describing plant materials and their growth habits, plant size and spacing, methods of irrigation and landscaping maintenance, as well as site plans, architectural elevations, floor plans, grading plans and other requirements as specified by the City.

8.6.3 Development Agreement
Approval of a statutory development agreement, authorized pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65864 et seq., City approval of individual statutory Development Agreements with each property owner may be included as part of the Specific Plan approval process and must be secured prior to approval of the first Final Map. The development agreement shall include, but not be limited to, methods for financing, acquisition, and construction of infrastructure, acquisition and development of adequate levels of parkland and schools and the provision of adequate housing opportunities for various segments of the community consistent with the regional housing needs identified for the City. All CenterPark development agreements shall be fully executed prior to the issuance of the first building permits for the project.

8.7 TRANSFER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS
The CenterPark Specific Plan allocates a maximum number of dwelling units to each residential Planning Area as indicated in the Table 1-1, Land Use Plan Summary of the Specific Plan. Variations in the number and type of dwelling units may occur at the time of the tentative tract map approval of a Planning Area and subject to approval by the City and agreement by the affected property owners/developers, depending upon the residential product identified for development. Allocation of residential dwelling units within the Planning Areas of the Specific Plan is permitted, provided the variation does not increase the total number of residential dwelling units established for each Planning Area by more than 15% and that the maximum residential dwelling unit count established in the CenterPark Specific Plan is not exceeded. 514

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
8-3
implementation
The total number of residential dwelling units developed within each Planning Area may be exceeded by up to 15% of the maximum number of dwelling units established for the Planning Area pursuant to the provisions of Section 8.7 of the CenterPark Specific Plan, “Transfer of Residential Dwelling Units,” provided the total number of dwelling units developed within the Specific Plan area does not exceed 4,293.

8.8 SPECIFIC PLAN MODIFICATIONS AND AMENDMENTS

8.8.1 Minor Modifications
The following constitute minor modifications to the Specific Plan, not requiring a Specific Plan Amendment and are subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. The Planning Director shall have the discretion to refer any such request for modification to the Planning Commission or the City Council. • Change in utility and/or public service provider.
• Collector roadway alignment when the change results in a centerline shift of less than 250 ft.. • An increase of up to 15% in the number of units established for an individual Planning Area subject to approval of the Planning Director and agreement of the property owner, provided the total number of units for the entire Specific Plan area does not exceed that number established in the Specific Plan. • Adjustment of a Planning Area boundary or acreage designated for a Planning Area, provided the total acreage of the affected Planning Area does not increase by more than 15%. • Minor changes to landscape materials, wall materials, wall alignment, entry design and streetscape design which are consistent with the conceptual design set forth in the Design Guidelines contained within the Specific Plan.
• Minor changes to the Design Guidelines, which are intended to be conceptual in nature, and are intended to be flexible in implementation including architectural style and detail changes, subject to the approval of the Planning Director.
• Minor changes of up to 10% of any quantifiable development standard or design guideline, subject to approval of the Planning Director.
• Other modifications of a similar nature to those listed above are deemed minor by the Planning Director and are in conformance with the Policy Plan.

8.8.2 Specific Plan Amendments
Amendments to the CenterPark Specific Plan may be requested by the applicant or the City pursuant to Section 65453(a) of the Government Code. Amendments shall be processed pursuant to the provisions of the Government Code for Specific Plan Amendments. In the event the proposed amendment requires supplemental environmental analysis pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the applicant(s) are responsible for preparing the necessary CEQA documentation. 515
8-4

8.9 VARIANCES
Variances and Administrative Exceptions to the development regulations contained in the CenterPark Specific Plan with respect to landscaping, screening, site area, site dimensions, yards and projects into yards, heights of structures, distances between buildings, open space and off-street parking and loading shall be reviewed pursuant of the City of Ontario Development Code.

8.10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
Uses specified as Conditionally Permitted Uses within Section 6, Development Regulations, of the Specific Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City pursuant to the requirements of Article 9, Conditional Use Permits.

8.11 COMPLIANCE WITH MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Certification of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) shall be required prior to approval of the CenterPark Specific Plan. Development within the project site shall comply with all approved mitigation measures as described in the Mitigation Monitoring Program included as part of the EIR.

8.12 PROJECT PHASING
Phasing of development within the CenterPark Specific Plan shall meet the following objectives (See Exhibit 8-1, Phasing Plan) :
• Orderly build-out of the community based upon market and economic conditions. • Provision of adequate infrastructure and public facilities as determined and deemed necessary by the City Engineer concurrent with development of each phase.
• Protection of public health, safety and welfare.

8.12.1 Mixed-Use Development
The phasing of commercial development areas shall be determined through the approval of tentative and final tract maps and development permits for Planning Area 1. Appropriate levels of infrastructure and community facilities shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and shall be installed and available to serve the commercial development as it occurs.

8.12.2 Residential Development
The phasing of residential development areas shall be determined through the approval of tentative and final tract maps and development permits for each Planning Area as developed. Appropriate levels of infrastructure and community facilities shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and shall be installed and available to serve each subsequent phase of residential development as it occurs. 516

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
8-5
implementation
EXHIBIT 8-1 PHASING PLAN
Eucalyptus Ave
Campus Ave
Edison Ave/
Ontario Ranch Rd
Cucamonga Ave
Sultana Ave
Bon View Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Campus Ave
Bon View Ave
Cucamonga Ave
Grove Ave
Parco Ave
Walker Ave
Baker Ave Baker Ave
Sultana Ave
Edison Ave/
Ontario Ranch Rd
1 2
3 4
PA 5
PA 6 PA 12
PA 13
PA 16
PA 18
PA 20
PA 21
PA 22
PA 19
PA 17
PA 11
PA 10
PA 9
PA 8
PA 7
PA 4
PA 3
PA 2
PA 1
PA 15
PA 14
517
8-6

8.12.3 Infrastructure
Backbone infrastructure within CenterPark shall be installed by the developer in accordance with the City’s adopted Master Plan or approved by the City Engineer. Infill service mains shall be constructed in phases as development proceeds and as conditioned by the City Engineer’s office to support individual phases of development, which may require installation of off-site infrastructure improvements beyond a given phase boundary.

Grading and installation of infrastructure to serve CenterPark is anticipated to be phased. Project required infrastructure will be extended from the east to the west in a timely manner to serve the CenterPark Specific Plan area and the surrounding future development. Mass grading on the site will be completed in at least 4 phases, following the extension of infrastructure from east to west. Final grading and on-site development of each phased neighborhood will be completed in multiple phasing.

Following completion of grading and infrastructure installation, the construction models for each product type within each neighborhood shall be permitted pursuant to the approval of a temporary conditional use permit. Phase I may include installation of infrastructure adequate to serve all Planning Areas.

8.12.4 Public Regional Park
The CenterPark Specific Plan area includes approximately 56 acres designated as part of the City’s Grand Park, a planned regional park that extends from Haven Avenue to Campus Avenue within the Ontario Ranch.

Improvements within the Grand Park will be installed in phases concurrent with the development of the adjacent Mixed Use and Residential planning areas.

8.12.5 Private Parks
In the event the City determines that the construction of private parks are required within any particular Planning Area, the timing for completion of each private park shall be determined as part of the City’s approval of tentative maps or development plans. Facilities shall be constructed and services made available in a timely manner as development progresses.

8.12.6 Community Facilities and Services
The timing for installation of community facilities and payment of impact fees for public improvements and services for the CenterPark Specific Plan shall be determined as part of the City’s approval of tentative tract maps in accordance with the provisions of the existing City development impact fee ordinances.

Community facilities such as bike trails shall be constructed in conjunction with construction of the public street improvements.

8.13 APPEALS
Appeals from any determination of the City Planning Director, Zoning Administrator or the Planning Commission may be made by the applicant or any other aggrieved party by filing an application on forms provided by the City of Ontario and accompanied by the appropriate filing fee, where applicable, within ten (10) days following the final date of action for which an appeal is made. Appeals shall be processed consistent with the provisions of Article 5, “Appeals” of the City of Ontario Development Code. 518

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
8-7
implementation

8.14 PROJECT FINANCING
The financing of construction, operation and maintenance of public improvements, facilities (the “facilities”) and public services shall include funding through a combination of financing mechanisms. Final determination of the facilities to be constructed and to maintenance responsibilities, whether publicly or privately maintained, shall be made prior to recordation of final maps. In order for the project to be fiscally self-sufficient, the following, but not limited to, financing options can be considered for implementation:

8.14.1 Facilities and Services
Private capital investment for the construction of facilities. Community Facilities District (CFD) established pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, or other special district, to provide funding for the construction of a variety of public facilities and the provision of public services.

8.14.2 Operation and Maintenance
• By individual private property owner.
• By private Homeowners Association.
• By Community Facilities District (CFD) established pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, or other special district. City Council approval is a prerequisite for the implementation of any and all special district-financing mechanisms. The use of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982 (the “Act”) to finance public facilities and services shall be at the City’s sole discretion. Moreover, the use of the Act shall be consistent with the City’s adopted goals and policies concerning the use of the Act.

8.15 MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
The public and private improvements constructed within CenterPark shall be maintained through a combination of public and private entities as shown in the following Table 8-1, Maintenance Responsibilities and described below:

8.15.1 Public Maintenance
• All Master Plan streets and sidewalks serving residential Planning Areas shall be dedicated as public streets to the City of Ontario.
• Landscape improvements within the public right-of-way of Master Plan streets, neighborhood edges, community and neighborhood entries and public street lights within CenterPark shall be maintained through a CFD or other special maintenance district established by the City. • All public on-site water, sewer and storm drains within the public streets or easements dedicated to the City shall be constructed by the developer and, upon acceptance, shall be maintained by the City. 519
8-8
(1) Only those facilities in public streets and those in private streets within public utility easements that meet public improvement design criteria. (2) “Corner Side Yard Landscaping” is the area between the fence and sidewalk on corner lot conditions. (3) The City is only responsible for OntarioNet fiber lines. Any other infrastructure would be privately maintained (Spectrum, Frontier, etc.).

City/
CFD HOA Homeowner PublicUtility
Master Plan Roadways (Ontario Ranch Road, Grove Avenue, Walker Avenue, Campus Avenue and Bon View Avenue) •
Public Streets (curb-to-curb for primary entry streets, secondary entry streets and neighborhood streets) •
Parkways of Master Plan Roadways and Neighborhood Edges (curb to perimeter walls, including landscape, sidewalks and street lights) • Private Streets (landscaping and sidewalks) •
Landscape Lettered Lots at corner conditions along Neighborhood Streets •
Traffic Signals and Public Street Lights (in the public right-of-way) • Private Street Lights (not in the public right-of-way) • Public Traffic Control Signs (in the public right-of-way) • Private Traffic Control Signs (not in the public right-of-way) • On-site Private Water, Sewer, and Storm Drain Improvements (improvements that are: private, lines behind meters and/or DCDAs, not within public streets, not within public utility easements, or not meeting public improvement design criteria)
• •
Off-site and On-site Public Water, Sewer, and Storm Drain Improvements •
Pocket Parks •
Private Recreation Areas •
Front Yard and Corner Side yard Landscaping (2) •
Community Theme Wall on Master Planned Roadways (outside face for graffiti removal and paint) •
Community Theme Wall on Master Planned Roadways: Surface (interior) opposite streetside (structural integrity and face repair) • Private Interior Yard Walls • •
Alley Landscaping and Lighting •
Police and Fire •
Electricity and Natural Gas •
Communication Systems •
Fiber Optic Infrastructure (3) •
NPDES Facilities (on-site) W.Q.M.P. •
NPDES Regional Facilities •
TABLE 8-1 MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
520

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
8-9
implementation
• Off-site infrastructure improvements such as water, sewer and storm drain facilities shall be maintained by the City upon acceptance. All permanent on-site water quality basins or other storm water retention/ bio-treatment facilities developed within CenterPark shall be maintained by the City/CFD in accordance with Table 8-1.

8.15.2 Homeowners Association
A Homeowners Association shall be established for the maintenance of common area landscape improvements and any private roadways within residential areas of CenterPark. Improvements to be maintained by the Homeowners Association include:
• Designated private drives, alleys and adjacent landscaping. • Designated private streets and landscaping. During the course of maintenance of public utilities within public streets, private streets, private drive aisles or alleys, the City will restore the streets to City standards for trench backfill, pavement repair and hardscape or landscape, as applicable. Restoration of any enhancements above and beyond City standards, including but not limited to architectural paving, hardscape and landscape enhancements shall be the responsibility of the HOA or other entity maintaining those enhancements.
• Parkways of interior neighborhood streets including sidewalks, landscaping and street lights as well as common areas distinct to individual residential types and neighborhoods. • Maintenance of interior neighborhood streets landscaping and associated architectural monument elements are required to restore these areas to their condition as originally installed. • Internal slopes fronting streets and slope areas in the rear of homes. • All internal open spaces, parks and common areas including any pools and/or tot lots. • NPDES facilities within private streets and common areas. • Homeowners Association to maintain shared private utilities. 521
This page intentionally left blank
522

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
9-1
general plan consistency
SECTION 9: GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
California Government Code (Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8, Section 65450-65457) permits the adoption and administration of specific plans as an implementation tool for elements contained in the local general plan. Specific Plans must demonstrate consistency in regulations, guidelines and programs with the goals and policies set forth in the general plan. The CenterPark Specific Plan has been prepared in conformance with the goals and policies of the City of the Ontario Plan (Policy Plan). The Policy Plan analysis in Table 9-1, Policy Plan Consistency describes the manner in which the CenterPark Specific Plan complies with The Ontario Plan (TOP) policies applicable to the project.

The TOP policies listed in this section reflect the policies in the place and at the time the CenterPark was adopted and may not reflect policy/update changes beyond the date of the Specific Plan adoption.

TABLE 9-1 POLICY PLAN CONSISTENCY

PLAN POLICY SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY

LAND USE ELEMENT
GOAL LU1: A community that has a spectrum of housing types and price ranges that match the jobs in the City and that make it possible for people to live and work in Ontario and maintain a quality of life.

LU1-1 Strategic Growth.

We concentrate growth in strategic locations that help
create place and identify, maximize available and planned infrastructure, and foster the development of transit and support the expansion of the active and multimodal transportation networks throughout the City.

The Specific Plan outlines a pedestrian sidewalk and multiuse trail network connecting neighborhoods to open space and adjacent future commercial land uses.

LU1-2 Sustainable Community Strategy.

We integrate state, regional and local Sustainable Community/ Smart Growth principles into the development and entitlement process.

Sustainable Community/Smart Growth principles are
incorporated into the CenterPark Land Use Plan. Pedestrian sidewalks and bicycle paths to be constructed as part of the project throughout the community provide connectivity among residential planning areas, parks and Commercial area to help reduce vehicle trips and miles traveled. The design of residential areas incorporates tree-lined parkways providing shade for pedestrians and parked cars. Safe and efficient pedestrian and bicycle connectivity is provided throughout the project.

The CenterPark architectural Design Guidelines allow for a variety of architectural styles that respond to local climate conditions. Some styles allow the incorporation of flat roofs that facilitate the use of solar collectors. All new construction will utilize design features, fixtures, appliances and heating and cooling controls to conserve energy and water. The landscape concept for CenterPark incorporates a plant palette of drought tolerant materials and requirements that the development implement planting and irrigation systems designed to
conserve water. Park and recreation areas will include shaded areas, bicycle racks and other amenity features to encourage pedestrian and other non-vehicular activities.
523
9-2

PLAN POLICY SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY
LU1-3 Adequate Capacity.

We require adequate infrastructure and services for all development.

The CenterPark Specific Plan establishes an infrastructure and public facilities plan to ensure that adequate roadways and public utilities including sewer, water and drainage facilities along with parks and other public facilities are provided to serve the project.

LU1-4 Multimodal Mobility.

We require development and urban design, where appropriate, that reduces reliance on the automobile and capitalizes on active transportation, transit, electric vehicles and multi-modal transportation opportunities.

The CenterPark Specific Plan requires the construction of Class 1 Bike Paths which are an integral element to creating accessibility and mobility within CenterPark. The Specific Plan requires locations and construction of bus turnouts that may be required within the project to be coordinated with and constructed to the satisfaction of the City of Ontario and Omnitrans.

LU1-6 Complete Community.

We incorporate a variety of land uses and building types in our land use planning efforts that result in a complete community where residents at all stages of life, employers, workers and visitors have a wide spectrum of choices of where they can live, work, shop and recreate within Ontario.

CenterPark provides for development of up to 4,293 residential dwelling units in a variety of residential single-family attached and detached housing types, where possible, focused on open space amenities.

GOAL LU2: Compatibility between a wide range of uses and resultant urban patterns and forms.

LU2-6 Infrastructure Compatibility.

We require infrastructure to be aesthetically pleasing and in context with the community character.

Arterial streets within CenterPark (if any) will be uniformly landscaped in an aesthetically pleasing manner with landscaped parkways on each side of the street and landscaped medians in main arterial streets of interest. A planting buffer varying in width from 30-50 ft. in width will be provided adjacent to sidewalks within the project adjacent to all arterial roadways.

Decorative project monuments will be constructed at key project entries providing community identification and establishing a sense of arrival and a welcoming feeling for the community.

LU2-9 Methane Gas Sites.

We require sensitive land uses and new uses on former dairy farms or other methane-producing sites be designed to minimize health risks.

The project will comply with appropriate mitigation measures identified in the project EIR for soil remediation and proper venting to address the potential existence of methane gases within the project.

GOAL LU4: Development that provides short term value only when the opportunity to achieve our Vision can be preserved.

LU4-3 Infrastructure Timing.

We require that the necessary infrastructure and services be in place prior to or concurrently with development.

Approval of the CenterPark Specific Plan is accompanied by the approval of development agreements. The development agreements shall include, but not be limited to, methods for financing, acquisition and construction of infrastructure, acquisition and development of adequate levels of parkland, as well as the provision of adequate housing opportunities for various segments of the community consistent with the City’s regional housing needs assessment. A CenterPark development agreement shall be fully approved before the issuance of a building permit for the project.
524

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
9-3
general plan consistency

PLAN POLICY SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY
GOAL LU5: Integrated airport systems and facilities that minimize negative impacts to the community and maximize economic benefits.

LU5-2 Airport Planning Consistency.

We coordinate with airport authorities to ensure The Ontario Plan is consistent with state law, federal regulations and/or adopted master plans and airport land use compatibility plans for the ONT and Chino Airport
The Specific Plan will comply with the ALUCP requirements for Ontario Airport (ONT) and Chino Airport as outlined in the CenterPark Specific Plan Section 2.8.

LU5-7 ALUCP Consistency and Land Use
Regulations.

We comply with state law that requires general plans, specific plans and all new development be consistent with the policies and criteria set forth within an Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for any public use airport.

The Specific Plan will comply with the ALUCP requirements for Ontario Airport (ONT) and Chino Airport as outlined in CenterPark Specific Plan Section 2.8.

COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
GOAL CD1: A dynamic, progressive city containing distinct and complete places that foster a positive sense of identity and belonging among residents, visitors, and businesses.

CD1-2 Place Types.

We establish Place Types in urban, mixed-use, and transitoriented areas to foster the City’s identity as a premier community and require new development within each Place Type to incorporate prescribed urban patterns, forms and placemaking priorities.

The Specific Plan includes Design Guidelines to guide the physical character of all future residential development and all community and neighborhood features, including the
overall landscape treatment within the project. The proposed community character establishes a unified aesthetic treatment and design theme. The community vision for CenterPark is based upon the architectural and landscape influences found in Ontario, and throughout Southern California. The architectural styles and landscape concept chosen for the community have been selected in order to be reflective of older neighborhoods of historic Ontario as well as to accommodate innovative transitional influences. Together, the architectural styles and landscape concept are designed to create a neighborhood character for CenterPark that will be sustainable over time.

CD1-5 View Corridors.

We require all major north-south streets be designed and redeveloped to feature views of the San Gabriel Mountains, which are part of the City’s visual identity and a key to geographic orientation. Such views should be free of visual clutter, including billboards, and may be enhanced by framing with trees.

The major north-south streets in CenterPark are designed to frame the views of the San Gabriel Mountains. The Specific Plan requires the construction of extensive landscaping on both sides of each street and in the median when appropriate. All new utility lines will be placed underground.
525
9-4

PLAN POLICY SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY
GOAL CD2: A high level of design quality resulting in neighborhoods, commercial areas, public spaces, parks and streetscapes that are attractive, safe, functional, human-scale and distinct.

CD2-1 Quality Building Design and Architecture.

We encourage all development projects to convey visual interest and character through:
• Building volume, massing and height to provide contextappropriate scale and proportion; • A true architectural style which is carried out in plan, section and elevation through all aspects of the building and site design and appropriate for its setting; and
• Exterior building materials that are articulated, high quality, durable and appropriate for the architectural style.

The Specific Plan includes Design Guidelines to guide the construction of the project by requiring building massing to address the street and the pedestrian experience, the use of selected architectural styles to be implemented in a comprehensive manner throughout each neighborhood around all building elevations and the use of building materials and architectural features and elements which are true to each selected style.

CD2-2 Neighborhood Design.

We create distinct residential neighborhoods that promote a sense of community and identity by emphasizing access, connectivity, livability and social interaction through such elements as:
• A pattern of smaller, walkable blocks that promote activity, safety and access to nearby amenities and services;
• Varied parcel sizes and lot configurations to accommodate a diversity of housing types;
• Traffic calming measures to slow traffic and promote
walkability while maintaining acceptable traffic flows and emergency evacuation access;
• Floor plans that encourage views onto the street and deemphasize the visual and physical dominance of garages (introducing the front porch as the “outdoor living room”), as appropriate; and
• Landscaped parkways, with sidewalks separated from
the curb and designed to maximize safety, comfort and
aesthetics for all users.

The CenterPark Specific Plan is designed as a walkable
community of traditional residential neighborhoods organized around a simple grid street system offering a variety of home types within an open space setting. Residents can walk or bike to parks via an interconnected network of sidewalks and trails throughout the community.

Traditional site planning elements, varied residential product design and architecture, well landscaped streets and enhanced entries combine to create welcoming neighborhoods within the community with aesthetic and functional harmony. Streets are linked together in a grid pattern with sidewalks separated from the street by landscaped parkways providing a simple and understandable system for pedestrian and vehicular travel connecting neighborhoods, open space amenities, public
facilities and recreational areas. A variety of housing types, including detached single-family homes, attached single-family homes, and multi-family homes are planned for CenterPark, all of which are located close to parks, and open space amenities.

Residential development standards and Design Guidelines contained in the Specific Plan ensure that homes are designed at a human scale, emphasizing architecture fronting the street.

Residential development standards are designed to minimize views of garage doors through use of alternating garage configurations. Traffic calming features incorporated into neighborhood streets include a traditional grid pattern with sidewalks, separated by landscaping on either side and the use of intersection chokers and roundabouts where appropriate. 526

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
9-5
general plan consistency

PLAN POLICY SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY
CD2-5 Streetscapes.

We design new and, when necessary, retrofit existing streets to improve walkability, bicycling and transit integration, strengthen connectivity and enhance community identity
through improvements to the public right-of-way such as sidewalks, street trees, parkways, curbs, street lighting and street furniture.

The Specific Plan is designed with a comprehensive street system to accommodate the safe and efficient movement of automobiles as well as bike trails and a multipurpose trail to accommodate bicycle and pedestrian mobility and connectivity throughout the community. Streets are designed as a grid system of short blocks allowing for various vehicular access points and travel routes.

Streets are designed with sidewalks separated from the street to create an inviting environment for walking. Streets connect neighborhoods and parks, through a variety of travel paths.

Bicycle accessibility is provided throughout the community through a network of off-street multipurpose trails within Ontario Ranch Road, Campus Avenue, Grove Avenue and
Walker Avenue which connect to a Class II Bike Path and Multipurpose Trail. Connectivity to this network of off-street bike trails from all residential Planning Areas is provided through the local street system.

CD2-6 Connectivity.

We promote development of local street patterns, multimodal networks and connected public spaces that create and unify neighborhoods, rather than divide them, and create cohesive and continuous corridors, rather than independent “islands” through the following means:
• Local street networks that provide access both between subdivisions and within neighborhoods and discourage
through traffic;
• A local street system that is logical and understandable for the user. A grid system is preferred to avoid circuitous and confusing travel paths between internal neighborhood areas and adjacent arterials and to provide adequate emergency and evacuation access; and
• Pedestrian and bicycle networks that provide convenient access to neighborhoods and nearby destinations, such as schools, parks, other public spaces, commercial areas and transit stops.

Off-street pedestrian circulation is available throughout CenterPark by means of the interconnected, paved sidewalk system within the roadway right-of-way, separated from
travel lanes by a landscaped parkway and within off-street Multipurpose Trails. The CenterPark pedestrian system provides connectivity among residential neighborhoods to pocket parks.

Streets are designed in a simple grid system with short blocks promoting a sense of small neighborhoods.
527
9-6

PLAN POLICY SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY
CD2-7 Sustainability.

We collaborate with the development community to design and build neighborhoods, streetscapes, sites, outdoor spaces, landscaping and buildings to reduce energy demand through solar orientation, maximum use of natural daylight, passive solar and natural ventilation, building form, mechanical and structural systems, building materials and construction techniques.

Sustainable Community/Smart Growth principles are
incorporated into the CenterPark Land Use Plan. The sustainable goals for the project as stated in the Specific Plan include the following:

1.Encourage walking and other non-vehicular modes of
travel.

2. Provide pedestrian connectivity throughout the
project.

3. Provide shaded outdoor areas.

4.Encourage the use of architectural elements designed to reduce interior heat gain.

5.Encourage the use of recycled, recyclable and
environmentally friendly building materials.

6.Require the use of low energy glass, low water plumbing features and energy efficient appliances.

7.Encourage the use of drought-tolerant landscaping and water-efficient irrigation methods.

Pedestrian and bicycle connectivity is provided among
residential planning areas and parks, helping to reduce vehicle trips and miles traveled. The design of residential areas incorporates tree-lined parkways providing shade for pedestrians and parked cars. Safe and efficient pedestrian and bicycle connectivity is provided throughout the project through a network of off-street bicycle trails, multi-use trails and sidewalks.

The CenterPark architectural Design Guidelines allow for a variety of styles that respond to local climate conditions.

Some styles allow the incorporation of flat roofs that facilitate the use of solar collectors. All new construction will utilize design features, fixtures, appliances and heating and cooling controls to conserve energy and water. The landscape concept for CenterPark incorporates a drought-tolerant plant palette and requires planting and irrigation systems designed to conserve water. Park and recreation areas will include shaded areas, bicycle racks and other amenity features to encourage pedestrian and other non-vehicular activities.

CD2-8 Safe Design.

We incorporate defensible space design into new and existing developments to ensure the maximum safe travel and visibility on pathways, corridors and open space and at building entrances and parking areas by avoiding physically and visually isolated spaces, maintenance of visibility and accessibility and use of lighting.

Residential development standards and Design Guidelines contained within the Specific Plan require home designs with fronts of homes, not garages, oriented toward the street to ensure that “eyes are on the street” in each neighborhood.

Residences are oriented around open space, parks and trails.

Parking areas and garages are located to the rear of residences to avoid dominance of the streetscape by automobiles and to enhance a pedestrian environment on all streets.
528

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
9-7
general plan consistency

PLAN POLICY SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY
CD2-9 Landscape Design.

We encourage durable, sustainable and drought-tolerant
landscaping materials and designs that enhance the aesthetics of structures, create and define public and private spaces and provide shade and environmental benefits.

The landscape concept for CenterPark incorporates the use of durable landscaping materials, a drought-tolerant plant palette and a planting, grading and irrigation system designed to conserve irrigation water and maximize the retention/ infiltration of rainfall runoff. Park and recreation areas will include shaded areas, bicycle racks and other amenity features to encourage pedestrian and other non-vehicular activities. All materials utilized in private and public common areas will be durable landscaping materials.

CD2-11 Entry Statements.

We encourage the inclusion of amenities, signage and
landscaping at the entry to neighborhoods, commercial centers, mixed-use areas, industrial developments and public places that reinforce them as uniquely identifiable places.

Signage and landscaping will be provided at neighborhood entries within CenterPark. Community and neighborhood
entry monumentation is required by the Specific Plan and is designed to establish a hierarchy for each Planning Area of the community. At key entries a monumentation program will be utilized to help identify the community as well as convey a sense of arrival and a welcoming feel for both vehicular and pedestrian traffic. These monuments and “gateways” are to be designed with durable, lasting materials approved by the City of Ontario. The “gateways” leading into the community of CenterPark will be elegant in appearance, classic in form, evoking the sense of arrival.

CD2-12 Site and Building Signage.

We encourage the use of sign programs that utilize
complementary materials, colors and themes. Project signage should be designed to effectively communicate and direct users to various aspects of the development and complement the character of the structures.

The Specific Plan requires the developer of CenterPark
to obtain approval by the City of a Master Sign Program to address project entries, neighborhood identification and way-finding signage within the project.

GOAL CD3: Vibrant urban environments that are organized around intense buildings, pedestrian and transit areas, public plazas and linkages between and within developments that are conveniently located, visually appealing and safe during all hours.

CD3-1 Unique Identity.

We promote development that heightens the unique character and identity of each Place Type by requiring compatible land uses and land planning, site design and building design that promotes an active public realm.

The Specific Plan is designed for bicycle and pedestrian accessibility throughout the community through a network of off-street bike and pedestrian trails within the neighborhood edges of major arterial streets. Connectivity to this network of off-street trails from all residential Planning Areas is provided through the local street system.

CD3-2 Comfortable, Human-Scale Public Realm.

We require that public spaces, including streets, parks and plazas on both public and private property be designed to maximize safety, comfort and aesthetics and connect to the citywide pedestrian, vehicular and bicycle networks.

The Specific Plan includes landscape Design Guidelines to enrich the community landscape and architectural style for CenterPark. The Design Guidelines are organized to define the basic landscape design principles for the project, to guide the implementation of the “design vision” and to ensure the design integrity of the project.
529
9-8

PLAN POLICY SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY
CD3-3 Complete and Connected Network.

We require that pedestrian, vehicular and bicycle circulation on both public and private property be coordinated to provide connections internally and externally to adjacent neighborhoods and properties (existing and planned) through a system of local roads and trails that promote walking and biking to nearby destinations (including existing and planned parks, commercial areas and transit stops) and are designed to maximize safety, comfort and aesthetics.

The Specific Plan includes infrastructure guidelines to align with the existing citywide circulation networks; offering street improvements and multi-modal neighborhood circulation
systems that will enhance and integrate into existing and planned developments within the citywide network.

CD 3-5 Active Frontages.

We create lively pedestrian streetscapes by requiring primary building, business and residential entrances, outdoor dining and storefronts be located on ground floors adjacent to sidewalks or public spaces and designed to maximize safety, comfort, aesthetics and the intended functionality (as defined by the Place Type).

The Specific Plan Design Guidelines promote street-facing front entries and architectural elements visible from adjacent streets, sidewalks and parks within the project to allow for a safe and aesthetically pleasing vibrant human-scale experience.

GOAL CD5: A sustained level of maintenance and improvement of properties, buildings and infrastructure that protects the property values and encourages additional public and private investments.

CD5-1 Maintenance of Buildings and Property.

We require all public and privately owned buildings and property (including trails and easements) to be properly and consistently maintained.

The Specific Plan includes a Maintenance Responsibility Matrix defining the public, private and utility entities responsible for maintenance of roadways, parkways, trails, sidewalks, common areas, parks, yards, walls and monuments, traffic signals, infrastructure and utilities within the project.

CD5-2 Maintenance of Infrastructure.

We require the continual maintenance of infrastructure.

The Specific Plan includes a Maintenance Responsibility Matrix defining the responsible entities for continual maintenance of roadways, sidewalks, traffic signals, off-site and on-site public water, sewer and storm drain infrastructure facilities.

COMMUNITY ECONOMICS ELEMENT
GOAL CE1: A complete community that provides for all incomes and stages of life.

CE1-7 Retail Goods and Services.

We seek to ensure a mix of retail businesses that provide the full continuum of goods and services for the community.

The commercial development will provide neighborhood retail and commercial services to meet the need of future residents within CenterPark and for the surrounding community. The proposed commercial uses will implement the policies of The Ontario Plan.

CE1-12 Circulation.

We continuously plan and improve public transit and nonvehicular circulation for the mobility of all, including those with limited or no access to private automobiles. (Refer to Mobility Public Transit)
The Design Guidelines incorporate multi-modal circulation through a network of trails, bicycle lanes and sidewalk system, encouraging alternative modes of travel. The Specific Plan requires the developer of the project to coordinate with the local mass transit provider, Omnitrans, to accommodate adequate areas for any bus turnouts within the Master Plan Roadways as required by Omnitrans.
530

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
9-9
general plan consistency

PLAN POLICY SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY
GOAL CE2: A City of distinctive neighborhoods, districts, corridors and centers where people choose to be.

CE2-1 Development Projects.

We require new development and redevelopment to create
unique, high-quality places that add value to the community. (Refer to Community Design Element)
The Design Guidelines incorporate a diversity of versatile architectural themes and place-making to produce
neighborhoods that have aesthetic and functional harmony for an overall community character to encourage interaction and gathering among neighbors.

CE2-4 Protection of Investment.

We require that new development and redevelopment protect existing investment by providing architecture and urban design of equal or greater quality.

The Specific Plan utilizes a variety of diverse architectural designs and themes to develop neighborhoods that will be aesthetically pleasing and functional, creating a community character that will continue to develop alongside the city.

MOBILITY ELEMENT
GOAL M1: A system of roadways that meets the mobility needs of a dynamic and prosperous Ontario.

M1-1 Roadway Design and Maintenance.

We require our roadways to:
• Comply with federal, state and local design and safety standards.
• Meet the needs of multiple transportation modes and users. • Handle the capacity envisioned in the City of Ontario Master Plan of Streets and Highways.
• Be maintained in accordance with best practices.
• Be compatible with the streetscape and surrounding land uses.
• Promote the efficient flow of all modes of traffic through the implementation of intelligent transportation systems and travel demand management strategies.

The Specific Plan requires the construction of a network of Master Plan Roadways designed consistent with the
requirements of the City of Ontario Master Plan of Streets and Highways and The Ontario Ranch Streetscape Master Plan.

The roadway system is designed to maintain an efficient flow of all modes of traffic at all intersections as discussed in the project EIR. Site design, source control and treatment BMP’s for the project are required to be submitted by the developer for approval by the City prior to issuance of permits for the project.

M1-2 Mitigation of Impacts.

We require development to mitigate its traffic impacts.

All mitigation measures, standard conditions and project design features identified in the project EIR to mitigate traffic impacts of the project will be implemented by the project.

GOAL M2: A system of trails and corridors that facilitate and encourage bicycling and walking active modes of transportation.

M2-3 Pedestrian Walkways.

We require streets to include sidewalks and visible crosswalks at major intersections where necessary to promote safe, comfortable mobility between residential areas, businesses, schools, parks, recreation areas and other key destination points.

The Specific Plan includes a plan for construction of an off-street pedestrian circulation system comprised of an interconnected, paved sidewalk system within all roadway rights-of-ways, separated from vehicular travel lanes by a landscaped parkway.

The CenterPark pedestrian system provides connectivity among residential neighborhoods to the pocket parks.
531
9-10

PLAN POLICY SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY
GOAL M3: A public transit system that is a viable alternative to automobile travel and meets the basic transportation needs of the transit dependent.

M3-2 Transit Facilities at New Development.

We require new development adjacent to an existing or planned transit stop to contribute to the creation of transit facilities, such as bus shelters, transit bays and turnouts and bicycle facilities, such as secure storage areas, as necessary.

The Specific Plan requires the developer of the project to coordinate with the local mass transit provider, Omnitrans, to accommodate adequate areas for any bus turnouts within the Master Plan Roadways as required by Omnitrans.

HOUSING ELEMENT
GOAL H2: Diversity of types of quality housing that are affordable to a range of household income levels, accommodate changing demographics and support and reinforce the economic sustainability of Ontario.

H2-4 Ontario Ranch.

We support a premier lifestyle community in the Ontario Ranch distinguished by diverse housing, highest design quality and cohesive and highly amenitized neighborhoods.

The Specific Plan allows for the development of up to 4,293 residential dwelling units comprised of a variety of singlefamily attached and detached homes. Residential land use areas are linked by a network of street-separated sidewalks and bicycle trails connecting all neighborhoods to parks.

Residential development is designed to address a variety of lifestyles and economic segments of the marketplace, such as singles, families, executives and “empty nesters.”
H2-5 Housing Design.

We require architectural excellence through adherence to City Design Guidelines, thoughtful site planning, environmentally sustainable practices and other best practices.

The Specific Plan includes architectural Design Guidelines to encourage development of diverse neighborhoods with the use of varied architectural styles, articulated with elements true to the architectural characteristics of each style
GOAL H5: A full range of housing types and community services that meet the special housing needs for all individuals and families in Ontario, regardless of income level, age or other status.

H5-2 Family Housing.

We support the development of larger rental apartments that are appropriate for families with children, including, as feasible, the provision of services, recreation and other amenities.

The Specific Plan allows for the development of condominium and multi-family home types designed to accommodate families with children. The Specific Plan requires that all condominium and multi-family developments within the project provide private recreational areas and/or pocket parks for residents of the development.
532

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
9-11
general plan consistency

PLAN POLICY SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES ELEMENT
GOAL ER1: A reliable and cost effective system that permits the City to manage its diverse water resources and needs.

ER1-3 Conservation and Sustainable Water Supply.

We work with regional water providers and users to conserve water and ensure sustainable local water supplies as more frequent droughts reduce long term local and regional water availability.

The Specific Plan requires all public and common area
landscaping within the project to utilize plant materials listed on the approved Specific Plan Landscape Plant Matrix which is comprised of drought-tolerant and California-friendly plant materials. The Specific Plan requires that irrigation systems for both public and private landscaped areas be designed to be as water-efficient as possible and includes the following minimum requirements:
• All irrigation systems shall have automatic controllers designed to properly water plant materials, given the site’s soil conditions. Irrigation systems for all public landscapes shall have automatic rain shut-off devices.
• Drip irrigation is not permitted within LMD landscape areas.
• Spray systems shall have low volume matched-precipitation heads.
• All LMD areas are to be controlled with central control irrigation systems and all trees are to be irrigated utilizing a flush grade bubbler system on a separate valve. All LMD areas shall be designed to City Standard Specifications. 533
9-12

PLAN POLICY SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY
ER1-5 Water Resource Management.

Environmental justice areas are prioritized as we coordinate with local agencies to protect water quality, prevent pollution, address existing contamination and remediate contaminated surface water and groundwater.

The Specific Plan requires that the developer obtain approval of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prior to issuance of grading or construction permits. The SWPPP will be prepared to comply with the California State Water Resources Control Board’s current “General Permit to Discharge Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity” and current “Area Wide Urban Storm Water Runoff (Regional NPDES)
Permit”. The SWPPP will identify and detail all appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP’s) to be implemented or
installed during construction of the project.

In addition to the preparation of a SWPPP for constructionrelated activities and as part of the approval of any grading plans for the project, each tract map developer will be required to submit a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) on the San Bernardino County Stormwater Program’s template form available at http://www.sbcounty.gov/dpw/land/npdes.asp.

The WQMP shall identify and detail all Low Impact
Development Site Design BMP’s, Source Control BMP’s and Treatment Control BMP’s to be implemented or installed as part of the project in order to reduce storm water pollutants and site runoff. In addition, as part of the submittal of the Tentative Tract Maps, all developers shall submit a Preliminary WQMP on the form available on the City of Ontario’s website, which will conceptually describe and detail the locations and approximate sizing of the proposed on-site LID BMPs that will be incorporated into the tract map layout.

ER1-6 Urban Run-Off Quantity.

We encourage the use of low impact development strategies, including green infrastructure, to intercept run-off, slow the discharge rate, increase infiltration and ultimately reduce discharge volumes to traditional storm drain systems.

The Specific Plan requires that the project be designed and graded to direct 2-year storm event run-off from building roofs and paved areas into swaled landscape areas for capture and retention/infiltration. In particular, open space, parks, landscaped setback areas and trails are to be used for this purpose in order to comply with the most recent requirements of the San Bernardino County NPDES Storm Water Program’s Quality Management (WQMP) for significant new development projects. In addition to these site design BMPs, each Tract Map project will incorporate structural and non-structural Source Control Best Management Practices (BMP’s) and on-site
Structural Treatment Control BMP’s, as needed. Participation in regional or watershed-based Treatment Control BMP’s as an alternative to on-site LID BMP implementation is regulated by the requirements of the San Bernardino County MS4 Urban Runoff Permit and the SB County Water Quality Management Plan Technical Guidance Document.
534

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
9-13
general plan consistency

PLAN POLICY SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY
ER1-7 Urban Run-Off Quality.

We require the control and management of urban run-off
consistent with Regional Water Quality Control Board
regulations.

The Specific Plan requires that the project comply with the most recent requirements of the San Bernardino County NPDES
Storm Water Program’s Quality Management (WQMP) for
significant new development projects. A final WQMP is required to be submitted by the developer for approval by the City prior to the issuance of any grading and construction permits for the project.

ER1-8 Wastewater Management.

We require the management of wastewater discharge and
collection consistent with waste discharge requirements adopted by the Regional Water Quality Control Board.

The Specific Plan requires the construction of a wastewater system consistent with City requirements and also requires that the project obtain approval of a WQMP for the project prior to the issuance of any grading or construction permit.

GOAL ER3: Cost-effective and reliable energy system sustained through a combination of low impact buildings, site and neighborhood energy conservation and diverse sources of energy generation that collectively help to minimize the region’s carbon footprint.

ER3-1 Conservation Strategy.

We require conservation as the first strategy to be employed to meet applicable energy-saving standards.

The Specific Plan requires all public and common area
landscaping within the project to utilize plant materials listed on the approved Specific Plan Landscape Plant Matrix which is comprised of drought-tolerant and California-friendly plant materials. The Specific Plan requires that irrigation systems for both public and private landscaped areas be designed to be as water-efficient as possible. The Specific Plan requires the construction of separate water mains for the use of recycled water in public and common areas of the project. The Specific Plan includes architectural styles that respond to local climate conditions and allow for the incorporation of flat roofs that facilitate the use of solar collectors. All new construction will utilize fixtures, appliances and heating and cooling controls to conserve water and energy.

ER3-2 Green Development - Communities.

We encourage the use of the LEED Neighborhood Development rating system, or similar mechanism, to guide the planning and development of all new communities.

The Specific Plan includes architectural guidelines which allow for a variety of styles that respond to local climate conditions.

Some styles allow the incorporation of flat roofs that facilitate the use of solar collectors. All new construction will utilize design features, fixtures, appliances and heating and cooling controls to conserve energy and water. The landscape concept for CenterPark incorporates a plant palette and a planting and irrigation system designed to conserve water. Park and recreation areas will include shaded areas, bicycle racks and other amenity features to encourage pedestrian and other nonvehicular activities.

ER3-3 Building and Site Design.

We require new construction to incorporate energy efficient building and site design strategies, which could include appropriate solar orientation, maximum use of natural daylight, passive solar and natural ventilation.

The Specific Plan includes architectural Design Guidelines which allow for a variety of styles that respond to local climate conditions. Some styles allow the incorporation of flat roofs that facilitate the use of solar collectors.
535
9-14

PLAN POLICY SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY
GOAL ER4: Improved indoor and outdoor air quality and reduced locally generated pollutant emissions.

ER4-4 Indoor Air Quality.

We will comply with State Green Building Codes relative to indoor air quality. We seek funding to improve indoor air quality for households with poor indoor air quality, with priority for lower income households in environmental justice areas.

All development within the Specific Plan will be required to comply with the State Green Building Code as implemented by the City.

GOAL ER5: Protected high-value habitat and farming and mineral resource extraction activities that are compatible with adjacent development.

ER5-2 Entitlement and Permitting Process.

We comply with state and federal regulations regarding
protected species.

The project will comply with all mitigation measures identified in the project EIR with regard to biological resources.

ER5-3 Right to Farm.

We support the right of existing farms to continue their operations within the Ontario Ranch.

The Specific Plan requires a minimum 100 ft. wide agricultural buffer be provided by the development between any new
residential structure and any existing animal feed trough, corral/ pen or an existing dairy/feed lot.

Ontario City CouncilApril 7, 2026

Ontario City Council
April 7, 2026