City of Orange Draft Citizen Participation Plan
Updated February 2022
CITY OF ORANGE
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
CDBG AND HOME PROGRAM FUNDS
I. PURPOSE
The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires jurisdictions that receive funding under certain federal entitle ment programs to adopt and comply with a Citizen Participation Plan ( CPP). The CPP sets forth the jurisdiction’s policies and procedures for citizen participation to ensure full compliance with federal regulations under Title 24 CFR Part 91. The City
currently receives annual entitlement grants for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program and HOME Investment Partnerships Program through HUD. This CPP primarily addresses the citizen participation requirements for the CDBG and HOME Programs. If the City receives federal entitlement grants from other funding sources in the future, the guidelines set forth in this CPP will be followed unless separate citizen participation requirements are issued by HUD.
The CPP provides a strategy to ensure the particip ation of citizens and other interested parties in the development of the Five-Year Consolidated Plan (CP), the Annual Action Plan (AAP) and the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) . The CP, which is prepared every five yea rs, identifies the City’s overall housing and community development needs and market conditions, establishes funding priorities, outlines a strategy to address these priorities, and provides the framework for the use of CDBG, HOME and other federal entitlement grant funds. The AAP is prepared annually and outlines eligible programs and projects that are to be funded with the annual allocation of federal grant funds received by the City to address the priorities of the CP. Last, the CAPER is prepared annua lly following the end of the program year to report on annual accomplishments.
The City’s citizen participation process provides nonprofit agencies, City departments, the community, and other interested parties with the opportunity to work in partnership with the City to develop the CP, the AAP, any substantial amendments to the CP or the APP , and the CAPER . This process includes identifying needs and determining recommendations for the allocation of HUD funds and review and approval of performance evaluation reports.
In accordance with the regulations relating to citizen participation, the City will encourage all residents to participate in the development of the C P including Low- and Moderate -Income persons, and residents of predominantly Low - and Moder ate-Income neighborhoods. The City will also take appropriate actions to encourage the participation of minorities, non- English speaking persons, and persons with disabilities by extending accommodations for participation in the CPP process.
669
City of Orange Draft Citizen Participation Plan
Updated February 2022
II. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION STRATEGY
A. PROGRAM PLANNING PROCESS
The City of Orange recognizes that CDBG and HOME funds are to be used primarily to benefit Low - and Moderate -Income persons and neighborhoods . The following policy defines the City’s citizen participation strategy in accordance with federal regulations.
1. Citizen Involvement
In order to ensure that Orange residents and other interested persons/organizations have the opportunity to participate in the CP, AAP and CAPER process, public meetings and publi c hearings will be held to obtain community input, consider proposals, and provide technical guidance. The public meetings and hearings will address housing and community development needs including priority non-housing community development needs, development of propose d activities, and r eview of program performance. The meetings and public hearings will be publicized through the following methods:
Display ads will be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdiction of the City of Orange at least 10 days before the meeting and hearing dates.
Notices of the meetings and public hearings will be posted at the public counters in the City Clerk's Office, Community Development Department, City of Orange Main Public Library, the public notice kiosk at Ci ty Hall, and the City of Orange Community Development Department website.
The following entities will participate in the process in the following manner.
Community Development Block Grant Program Committee:
The Community Development Bloc k Grant Program Committee (CDBG Committee) will be comprised of up to five members from the community and will act as an advisory body to the City Council concerning planning, recommending, and implementing CDBG and HOME Program funding requests and allocations. This process will include the following tasks:
Disseminating pertinent information during the CDBG application process, and other HUD application processes as applicable;
Receiving presentations from nonprofit agencies and City Departments;
Evaluating and rating applications for CDBG and other federal grant funding;
Collecting citizen input concerning neighborhoods and community needs;
Reviewing and providing feedback on draft funding recommendations for proposed projects for City Council's review and final approval; and
Reviewing project/program progress and annual performance 670
City of Orange Draft Citizen Participation Plan
Updated February 2022
Community Development Department:
The Community Development Department will be the lead agency in the coordination of the CPP, CP, AAP and CAPER development and reporting process and w ill coordin ate all required activities and amendments. For the CP process, the Community Development Department will conduct a needs assessment survey every five years to identify community development needs. The survey will be sen t to various stakeholders including nonprofit agencie s, City Departments, State and local health agencies, and the Orange County Housing Authority and will notify them of the public hearings before the CDBG Committee and City Council. The Community Developm ent Department will send written notice to various City Departments and nonprofit agencies each year notifying them of the Notice of Funding Availability process for CDBG program, and that applications are being accepted.
Citizen Participation Process:
The City of Orange will implemen t the following strategy to solicit meaningful community input during the preparation of the CP, AAP or CAPER. All public meetings and hearings will be conducted at City Hall located at 300 East Chapman Avenue, or at ke y public facilities which are easily accessible to the general public including persons with disabilities. During public health emergencies, all public meetings and hearings will be conducted virtually or in-person and public comments will be received via emails, voice mails, e-comment features, or in-person.
Consolidated Plan Process:
At a minimum, this plan will ensure that all HUD requirements are met as follows:
The City will hold at least two public hearings during the CP process to obtain citizens’ views and to respond to proposals a nd questions. The first public hearing will be held during the development of the CP and will be held before the CDBG Committee; the second public hearing will be held before the City Council.
Notices of the meeti ngs and public hearings will be posted at the public counters in the City Clerk's Office, Community Services Department, Community Development Department, City of Orange Main Public Librar y, the public notice kiosk at City Hall, and the City of Community Development Department website.
There will be a 30 -day review period for citizen s to review and comment on the CP prior to approving the CP by City Council and submitting the CP to HUD.
Public comments will be given consideration. The plan will include a summary of comments received and, if applicable, reasons any comments/suggestions were not incorporated.
Annual Action Plan Process:
At a minimum, this plan will ensure that all HUD requirements are met as follows:
During the AAP process, at least one public meeting and two public hearings will be held. The first public hearing will be held by the CDBG Committee to receive application presentations 671
City of Orange Draft Citizen Participation Plan
Updated February 2022
from City Departments and nonprofit agencies for CDBG and federal funding to obtain citizens’ views.
The CDBG Committee will hold one publi c meeting during the developm ent of the plan to review, discuss and deliberate on the formulation of funding recommendations for the City Council.
The City Council will hold one public hearing to consider the funding re commendations and approve the AAP.
The proposed AAP will be published. At a minimum, the City will publish a summary of the proposed plan in a newspaper of general circulation.
Notices of the meetings and public hearings will be post ed at the public co unters in the City Clerk's Office, Community Development Department, City of Orange Main Public Library, the public notice kiosk at City Hall , and the City of Orange Community Development Department website.
There will be a 30 -day period for citizen review and comment prior to submitting t he AAP to the City Council for approval and submitting to HUD.
Public comments will be given consideration. The plan will include a summary of comments received and, if applicable, reasons any comments/suggestions were not incorporated.
Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) Process:
At a minimum, this plan will ensure that all HUD requirements are met as follows:
The proposed CAPER will be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdiction of the City of Orange.
There will be a 15 -day period f or citizen review and comment prior to submitting the CAPER to HUD.
Public comments will be given consideration. The plan will i nclude a summary of comments received and, if applicable, reasons any comments/suggestions were not incorporated.
2. Public Health Emergency, Natural Disaster, or Other Emergency
During a public health emergency, natural disaster, or other emergency, t he City will follow an expedited planning process to address the acute needs of the Low- and Moderate-Income residents in a timely manner. The expedited process includes a five-day public review process and one City Council meeting (virtual or in -person) to review and approve the reprogramming of funds and substa ntial amendments to the CP or the AAP . Public comments will be received by email or voice mail during the five-day public review process and at the City Council hearing by using the e -comment feature to submit comments or through appearing at City Hall and providing in-person comments
B. ACCESS TO RECORDS
672
City of Orange Draft Citizen Participation Plan
Updated February 2022
The City will ensure timely and reasonable access to information and records related to the development of the CP, and the use of monies for pr ograms funded by CDBG and HOME funds for the past five years. Information to be made available will include budget and progra m performance information, meeting minutes, and comments received by the City during the development of the CP.
Certain records will remain confidential to protect the privacy rights of affected households.
Requests for information and records must be ma de to the City Clerk Department in writing by a Public Records Act request. Staff will respond to such requests within 10 days.
C. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
Upon request, st aff will p rovide technical assistance to develop funding requests for CDBG -eligible activities. The following technical assistance will be provided:
The annual project proposal submission and review cycle will include the distribution of information, instructions, forms and resources to interested citizens or representative groups so that they may have reasonable access to the funding consideration process.
Self-explanatory project proposal forms and instruc tions will be provided to all persons who request them wh ether by telephone , letter, or email . The City's application for funds is designed to be easily understood, while still covering all key items necessary to determine the merits of the request. Cens us and Block Group data and m aps depicting the a reas of t he City will be furnished upon request.
City staff will answer questions rece ived from citizens or representative groups asking for assistance with writing or submit ting eligible project proposals . Such assistance will not necessarily result in the provision of funds to said groups.
Meetings will be conducted with groups or individuals as requested, to assist in identifying specific needs and to provide guidance in preparing project proposal applications.
Completed project proposal forms from citizens or local nonprofit agencies will be assembled and a list of these proposals will be made available for public review.
A project eligibility analysis process will be conducted at an early stage to d etermine the eligibility of each project. In c ases where only minor adjustments are needed to make proposals eligible or otherwise practical, City staff will allow the proponents to make necessary changes to the proposals within a reasonable time period.
D. COMMENTS AND COMPLAINTS
1. Comments
Citizens or adjacent localities, as well as agencies providing services to the community, wi ll be encouraged to state or submit their comments on the development of the CP or the AAP , suggest amendments to the C P or the AAP, or the CAPER . Written and verbal comments received at public hearings or during the public review period will be consider ed, summarized, and included with the 673
City of Orange Draft Citizen Participation Plan
Updated February 2022
City’s response in the final CP , AAP and CAPER. Comments and responses will also be included in amendments to the C P, AAP and CAPER. Wri tten comments can be emailed to the Community Development Department via [email protected] or addressed to: Administrative Analyst, City of Orange, Community Development Department, 300 East Chapman Avenue, Orange, CA 92866
A written response will be made to all written comments within 10 working days after receiving comments, acknowledging the letter and identifying a plan of action, if necessary. Ever y effort will be made to send a complete resp onse within 10 working days to those who submit written proposals or comments.
Copies of the complete final CP, AAP, CAPER, and any amendments will be available to interested parties in the Community Development Department. The City will provide a summary of the CP, AAP or CAPER upon request.
2. Complaints
Complaints regarding the CP planning process, AAP planning process, CAPER or proposed amendments must be made within 30 days from the date the document is published for comment. A written response w ill be mad e to all written complaints within five working days, acknowledging the letter and identifying a plan of action, if necessary. Staff will provide complete written responses to citizen complaints within 10 working days from the date of their complaint when practicable.
The City will accept written complaints provided that they:
Include the name, address, and telephone number of the complainant and the date of the complaint.
Describe the objection and provide supporting facts and data.
E. BILINGUAL OPPORTUNITIES
Wherever a significant number of residents speak and read a primary l anguage other than English, translation services at all public hearings will be provided in such language if translation services are requested in advance.
F. AMENDMENTS TO THE ACTION PLAN OR THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN
The City may transfer a portion of the allocations among approved, related activities (e.g., street rehabilitation projects) when necessary to offset budget s hortfalls. CDBG -funded Public Facilities activities that require change orders to increase or reallocate their respective budgets will be subject to City Manager approval for changes involving $30,000 or less, or City Council approval for changes involving more than $30,000.
Pursuant to Title 24 CFR Part 92, t he City will perform a “substantial amendment” of its approved AAP or CP whenever one of the following occurs:
A change in goals and policies of the AAP or CP
674
City of Orange Draft Citizen Participation Plan
Updated February 2022
Allocation of CDBG and HOME funds, i ncluding program income , to a new activity not previously described in the AAP or CP
Substantial change in the purpose, scope, location, or beneficiaries of an existing activity
Reallocation of more than 20 percent of CDBG or HOME entitlement funds for the program year
The process for a “substantial amendment” consists of the following during non-emergency scenarios.
1. Publishing a 10- day public notice of the date, time, and place of the public hearing in a newspaper of general circulation within the jur isdiction of the City of Orange as well as the City’s social media platforms.
2. Holding one public hearing before the City Council.
3. Noticing of the public hearing will be posted at the public counters in the City Clerk's Office, Community Development Department, City of Orange Main Public Library, the public not ice kiosk at City Hall, and the City of Orange Community Development website.
In case of public health emergency, natural disasters, or other emergencies, the above process follows an “expedited process” outlined under Section A.2.
G. APPEALS
Appeals co ncerning the Plans or decisions, statements, or recommendations of the staff should be made to the following parties in the order listed: Administrative Analyst, Community Development Department Director, City Manager, CDBG Program Committee, City Council, and finally, the Los Angeles Area HUD office.
H. ANTI-DISPLACEMENT/RELOCATION
In the event that any residential displacement and relocation must take place in order to carry o ut a program activity, the City of Orange ensures that it wil l collaborate with the applicant/developer to prepare and approve an Anti -displacement and Relocation Plan in connection with that project as required by federal regulations. In the event that any acquisition and relocation is required to carry out a program act ivity, the City of Orange will also comply with f ederal acquisition and relocation requirements pursuant to Uniform Relocation Assistance Policies Act of 1970 under Title 49 CFR Part
24. I. ASSURANCES
The Citizen Participation Plan outlines the n ecessary processes to engage the public when preparing or amending the CP, AAP or CAPER. Prior to City Council approval, citizens will be given a reasonable opportunity to comment on the CP, AAP or CAPER. The CP, AAP or CAPER will be made available to the public and reason able efforts will be made to make the se documents available in a format accessible to persons with disabilities, or in another language upon their request.
675
City of Orange Draft Citizen Participation Plan
Updated February 2022
The City of Orange as sures that the most diligent efforts will be made to comply w ith the process and procedures outlined in this Citizen Participation Plan.
676
From: Diaz, Cristan A
To: [email protected]
Subject: FY 2021 Revised CDBG Amounts
Date: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 3:32:38 PM
This is to inform you that CDBG allocation for FY 2021 has been revised. The allocation has been increased by approximately 1.5%. Please open this link to view your new CDBG amount:
https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/comm_planning/budget/fy21
We realize that the timing of revision may be problematic for many jurisdictions. We anticipate that for most jurisdictions, this nominal change will not trigger a substantial amendment; however, the SF 424 will have to reflect the revised amount and the additional money will have to reflected in IDIS.
Our Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, James Arthur Jemison II, has provided a blanket waiver that has reduced the citizen participation public comment period from 30 days to 3 days. This waiver is in effect through August 16, 2021 and is limited to facilitating preparation of the grantee’s FY 2021 Consolidated Plan or Annual Action Plan and FY 2021 Plan substantial amendments.
Please note that you will receive an email this week transmitting the new CDBG Allocation letters, dated May 13, 2021 and copy of the waiver notice. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact the CPD Representative assigned to your community. We apologize for the inconvenience this change has created and look forward to working with you to rectify this situation.
Questions? Please contact your CPD representative.
Los Angeles Community Planning and Development (CPD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Home Investment Partnerships (HOME) Program Mailing List is a newsletter from the HUD Los Angeles Area CPD Field Office featuring news and program information affecting housing and community development programs in the Southern California area.
Bulk subscriptions:
Some industry folks have asked, "How do I sign up my entire staff for this Mailing List?" It is easy. Just list your staff email addresses like this:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
You can send in one email address or a dozen. Email your list to:
To unsubscribe – email [email protected] and just type in “UNSUBSCRIBE” in the Subject line.
######################################################################## We hope that you will want to continue receiving information from HUD. 677
We safeguard our lists and do not rent, sell, or permit the use of our lists by others, at any time, for any reason.
HUD COVID-19 Resources and Fact Sheets
678
FY 202L CPD Allocations - USA
010072
oL0t44
010216
0L0228
0L0594
010624
010810
010882
011218
071.542
011560
011740
012268
019073
019097
0L9999
020078
029999
040018
040054
040072
0407L4
040144
040180
040186
040198
040270
040324
040330
040348
01c983 Anniston
Auburn
Bessemer
Birmingham
Decatur
Dothan
Florence
Gadsden
Huntsville
Mobile
Montgomery
Opelika
Tuscaloosa
Jefferson County
Mobile County
Alabama Nonentitlement
Anchorage
Alaska Nonentitlement
Avondale City
Casa Grande
Chandler
Douglas city
s563,039
s686,092
5598,741,
s6,054,064
5496,246
55L0,4L2
s333,420
5L,047,57O
51,434,19s
$2,442,623
51,,744,9s8
5297,180
5844,439
s2,510,681
5!,7\3,52L
524,256,LOz
5L,948,478
53,349,442
s756,950
5485,274
s1,468,384
5174,760
S579,786
S1,004,411
s2,459,350
$429,038
54,296,734
S831,353
Si.6,806,480
s251,857
51,,232,9!7
s258,431
s666,084
5L,94O,52L
s5,732,384
5930,+97
s2,ggo,61g
53,000,218
s1,834,045
$g,gqz,aM
s488,416
5748,785
59tt,q22
5445,947
so s401,706
5o So
SO SO
so s1,400,013
SO SO
SO SO
SO SO
SO SO
so 5746,709
so 58s0,807
s0 s907,387
5o So
so 5474,854
50, 5992,574
So S6o+,:gs
5o 5tL,227,286
$0, 5tqs,6qq
So S3,ooo,ooo
SO SO
50 So
so 5o
SO SO
SO SO
SO SO
so 5o
so 5o
5o S1,546,684
SO SO
so s5,892,094
o 53,523,477
so $753,qqq
So, 54,623,380
so so
so s612,860
sSZO,ZOg s5,884,026
so so
SO. SO
So 5414,680
$o so
040384
040408
040456
040468
O4Ot492 O4CO4O
040558 04C997
049013 04C039
049019
049021
049999
050600
0s0894
050930
051302
Flagstaff
Gilbert
Glendale
Goodyear
Mesa
Peoria City
Phoenix
Prescott
Scottsd a le
Sierra Vista city
Surprise City
Tempe
Tucson
Yuma
Maricopa County
Pima County
Pinal County
Arizona Nonentitlement
Conway
Fayetteville
Fort Smith
Hot Springs
0 0
0 0
s
s
S
S
s
s
$o
So
So
5o
So
CDBG RHP HOMEKEY CNSRTKEY NAME STA
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
.AL
AL
AL
AZ
.AZ
AK
AK
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AR
.AR
AR
AR
679
062472
062454
062490
062s08
o62532
062556
062s68
062622
National City
Newport Beach
Norwalk
Oakland
Oceanside
Ontario
Orange
Oxnard
I
F
5o
So
So
So
So
So
So
5744,198
s391,662
1,237,2L5
7,750,367
1,375,537
1,909,738
1,L63,t62
So
So
$o
So
So
So
So
$o
S328,323
So
5340,237
53,L24,987
s620,399
$748,625
54s7,tzs
s764,831
5s77,747
So
So
So
So
5300,303
s839,445
So
So
So
So
So
S880,1e1
So
So
So
So
544L,196
SO
s329,864
So
St,tg6,z5z
So
s337,5t2
So
52,517,795
S80s,337
5!,395,707
So
$s,792,329
S5,161,731
s3,22L,675
So
SO
So
51,706,23L
S5i.3,8i.7
5443,011
S527,899
062658
062670.
062676.
062682.
062700
062706
062724
062754
062760
062766
062790
062826
052850
062862
928
T-+-
lmdale
im Desert
lm Springs
lo Alto
i Pal
-1Pd
]:a
-"ltst
062930
062949
0629s8
062970
Paradise
Paramount City
Pasadena
Perris City
Petaluma
Pico Rivera
Pleasanton City
Pomona
Porterville
Rancho Cordova City
Rancho Cucamonga
r Rancho Santa Margarita
Redding
Redondo Beach
Redwood City
Rialto
Riverside
Rocklin City
Rosemead
Roseville
Sacramento
Salinas
San Bernardino
San Clemente
San Diego
San Francisco
San Jose
San Leandro
San Marcos City
San Mateo
Santa Ana
Santa Barbara
Santa Clara
Santa Clarita
So
so
So
$o
$o
So
So
$o
5o
So
So
So
So
5o
so
So
So
So
So
$o
So
So
SO
So
So
So
SO
062976
062988
063048
063054
063102
063180
063198
063210
063228
0632s8
063294
063312
063342
063348
*-*--f-----
So
So
So
So
So
063354
S536,756
s
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA 5t2q,on
5777,492
52,145,795
s968,708
S360,441
S635,918
5626,788
s368,034
1,547,567
5424,832
5431,381
_i'_
CA
CA
CA
CA
Pittsburg
52,073,496
s868,243
5635,018
5t,07o,323
5204,716
5762,88s
5294,759
s780,758
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
51,266,458
ss,rga,sr+
5284,327
5749,37s
5747,s77
s4,839,133
52,tzg,7zs
s3,307,949
$774,605
S807,396
577o,43s
S5,640,635
s909,454
CA
CA
CA
I
CA
+-
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
s
51,494,849
680
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.36. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0216
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rob Houston, City Manager
1. SUBJECT
Letter of Support for Senate Bill 1418 Regional Public Safety Collaborative.
2. SUMMARY
Senate Bill 1418 would provide for ongoing funding of regional programs to address homelessness, youth violence, and post-incarceration re-entry through the North Orange County Public Safety Collaborative.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the Mayor to sign the letter of support for Senate Bill 1418.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Provide for a safe community
e: Develop and implement effective community outreach services and programs to promote public safety.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
State Senator Josh Newman is sponsoring Senate Bill 1418 to ensure ongoing funding for the North Orange County Public Safety Collaborative (Collaborative) and establish a similar collaborative and funding for the Central Coast. The Collaborative coordinates the efforts of 11 cities, including the City of Orange, to regionally address the issues of homelessness, youth violence, and post-incarceration re-entry. Since its inception in 2017, the Collaborative has:
· Conducted the county’sfirst Homeless Census to create a by-name registry of unsheltered individuals.
· Funded over 48 programs for youth including counseling, tutoring, leadership development, and mentoring programs.
· Provided housing and supportive services for formerly incarcerated university students. · Assisted with the development of the Outreach Grid mobile data management and referral tool to instantly identify available shelter beds and other services.
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
681
Item #: 3.36. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0216
· Regionalized street outreach and engagement services.
To date, the Collaborative has provided $118,181 directly to the City of Orange. This funding has been programmed for additional park security, trash/abandoned property cleanup, and funding for police activities to address homelessness.
7. ATTACHMENT
· City of Orange Senate Bill 1418 Support Letter
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
682
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.36. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0216
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rob Houston, City Manager
1. SUBJECT
Letter of Support for Senate Bill 1418 Regional Public Safety Collaborative.
2. SUMMARY
Senate Bill 1418 would provide for ongoing funding of regional programs to address homelessness, youth violence, and post-incarceration re-entry through the North Orange County Public Safety Collaborative.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the Mayor to sign the letter of support for Senate Bill 1418.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Provide for a safe community
e: Develop and implement effective community outreach services and programs to promote public safety.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
State Senator Josh Newman is sponsoring Senate Bill 1418 to ensure ongoing funding for the North Orange County Public Safety Collaborative (Collaborative) and establish a similar collaborative and funding for the Central Coast. The Collaborative coordinates the efforts of 11 cities, including the City of Orange, to regionally address the issues of homelessness, youth violence, and post-incarceration re-entry. Since its inception in 2017, the Collaborative has:
· Conducted the county’sfirst Homeless Census to create a by-name registry of unsheltered individuals.
· Funded over 48 programs for youth including counseling, tutoring, leadership development, and mentoring programs.
· Provided housing and supportive services for formerly incarcerated university students. · Assisted with the development of the Outreach Grid mobile data management and referral tool to instantly identify available shelter beds and other services.
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
683
Item #: 3.36. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0216
· Regionalized street outreach and engagement services.
To date, the Collaborative has provided $118,181 directly to the City of Orange. This funding has been programmed for additional park security, trash/abandoned property cleanup, and funding for police activities to address homelessness.
7. ATTACHMENT
· City of Orange Senate Bill 1418 Support Letter
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
684
April 12, 2022
The Honorable Josh Newman
Senate District 29
1021 O Street, Room 6520
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: SB 1418 (Newman) Regional Public Safety Collaborative Dear Senator Newman:
The City of Orange is writing to express our support of SB 1418, which will codify and fund two parallel ongoing collaborative programs on an ongoing basis: one in North Orange County and one in the Central Coast, that takes a deliberate collaborative approach to expand and refine programs that address youth violence, promote re-entry following incarceration, and develop better and more effective strategies and plans toward solving homelessness on a regional level.
On their own, cities have had, at best, limited success addressing homelessness, youth violence, and the challenges associated with post-incarceration re-entry. On the one hand, these endemic problems tend to defy municipal boundaries, while on the other, their inherently local nature tends to defeat top-down solutions devised and implemented at the state, or even county, levels.
Leveraging the State’s investments, the North Orange County Collaborative (Collaborative) has shown significant promise in aligning and coordinating the efforts of ten local law enforcement across their shared geography, while simultaneously enlisting and funding more than 40 local community-based organizations with experience and expertise in treating the underlying causes of these complex challenges. It was originally established through the 2017-18 state budget act with an appropriation of $20 million across its first four years. The Collaborative, which initially included six cities, was subsequently expanded to include eleven cities in Northern Orange County, after receiving an additional $7.8 million allocation in last year’s budget to fund its operation through the end of the current fiscal year.
The City of Orange is proud to be a member of the Collaborative and has worked tirelessly with our partners and neighbors to address youth violence, homelessness, and re-entry programs following incarceration. Community-based organizations and law enforcement have stopped working in silos and instead are working in coordination to help individuals in the region. The proven success and evidence based results of the Collaborative SB 1418 will codify as an ongoing program the innovative existing public safety collaborative model developed in Northern Orange County while also replicating and funding a second, analogous collaborative model in the Central Coast region. 685
For all of the above reasons, the City of Orange supports SB 1418.
Sincerely,
Mark A. Murphy
Mayor, City of Orange
686
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.37. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0180
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Rob Houston, City Manager
FROM: Christopher Cash, Public Works Director
1. SUBJECT
Designation of April 29, 2022, as Arbor Day. Resolution No. 11383.
2. SUMMARY
Adoption of Resolution No. 11383 will designate April 29, 2022 as Arbor Day in the City of Orange.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Resolution No. 11383. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange designating April 29, 2022, as Arbor Day.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
None
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 3: Enhance and promote quality of life in the community a: Renovate, maintain, develop, and/or expand public use places and spaces.
Goal 3: Enhance and promote quality of life in the community b: Deliver high quality and safe recreational, social, environmental, educational and cultural services.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
The City of Orange has been performing Arbor Day Events for over 30 years. Our City has been named a Tree City USA by the Arbor Day Foundation for 33 consecutive years. An annual observance of Arbor Day is a requirement for maintaining the City of Orange as a Tree City USA. The Arbor Day plantings allow us to beautify neighborhoods with the involvement of the community by planting hundreds of trees. Arbor Day is a fantastic opportunity to involve the community in the appreciation of trees. The interaction with community members and trees results in a connection with nature and a caring for important green infrastructure. This connection oftentimes spreads to other community members following an event. The direct involvement with this event not only is an opportunity to bring the community together, but it instills a sense of ownership and care for trees.
This is especially important with the involvement of the younger volunteers who often have yet to develop an appreciation for trees prior to such an event.
The observation of Arbor Day and community planting event will be on April 30, 2022. Volunteers from the community will be planting 11 15-gallon ‘KeithDavey’Pistache trees in the parkways at the City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
687
Item #: 3.37. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0180
from the community will be planting 11 15-gallon ‘KeithDavey’Pistache trees in the parkways at the 900 Block of E Heim Ave. The trees are being donated for the event by West Coast Arborists.
Participation in an Arbor Day event is required as part of the annual certification for Tree City USA.
7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. 11383
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
688
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.37. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0180
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Rob Houston, City Manager
FROM: Christopher Cash, Public Works Director
1. SUBJECT
Designation of April 29, 2022, as Arbor Day. Resolution No. 11383.
2. SUMMARY
Adoption of Resolution No. 11383 will designate April 29, 2022 as Arbor Day in the City of Orange.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Resolution No. 11383. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange designating April 29, 2022, as Arbor Day.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
None
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 3: Enhance and promote quality of life in the community a: Renovate, maintain, develop, and/or expand public use places and spaces.
Goal 3: Enhance and promote quality of life in the community b: Deliver high quality and safe recreational, social, environmental, educational and cultural services.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
The City of Orange has been performing Arbor Day Events for over 30 years. Our City has been named a Tree City USA by the Arbor Day Foundation for 33 consecutive years. An annual observance of Arbor Day is a requirement for maintaining the City of Orange as a Tree City USA. The Arbor Day plantings allow us to beautify neighborhoods with the involvement of the community by planting hundreds of trees. Arbor Day is a fantastic opportunity to involve the community in the appreciation of trees. The interaction with community members and trees results in a connection with nature and a caring for important green infrastructure. This connection oftentimes spreads to other community members following an event. The direct involvement with this event not only is an opportunity to bring the community together, but it instills a sense of ownership and care for trees.
This is especially important with the involvement of the younger volunteers who often have yet to develop an appreciation for trees prior to such an event.
The observation of Arbor Day and community planting event will be on April 30, 2022. Volunteers from the community will be planting 11 15-gallon ‘KeithDavey’Pistache trees in the parkways at the City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
689
Item #: 3.37. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0180
from the community will be planting 11 15-gallon ‘KeithDavey’Pistache trees in the parkways at the 900 Block of E Heim Ave. The trees are being donated for the event by West Coast Arborists.
Participation in an Arbor Day event is required as part of the annual certification for Tree City USA.
7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. 11383
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
690
1 RESOLUTION NO. 11383
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ORANGE DESIGNATING
APRIL 29, 2022 AS ARBOR DAY
WHEREAS, in 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees and this special day, called “Arbor Day ,” was first observed with the planting of more than one million trees in Nebraska. This day is now observed throughout the Nation and the World; and
WHEREAS, participating in Arbor Day events promotes the development of civic pride, a sense of community, highlights the importance of planting and caring for trees; and
WHEREAS, trees are living green infrastructure, which produce oxygen, clean the air of pollutants, sequester carbon, help manage storm water, and provide essential habitat for wildlife; and
WHEREAS, trees in our City increase property values, and enhance economic vitality of business areas.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orange as follows:
1. That the foregoing recitals are incorporated in and made part of this Resolution by reference;
2. That the City Council does hereby designate Friday, April 29, 2022 as Arbor Day within the City of Orange.
ADOPTED this ____ day of ____________________, 2022
Mark A. Murphy, Mayor, City of Orange
ATTEST:
Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
691
2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF ORANGE )
I, PAMELA COLEMAN, City Clerk of the City of Orange, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Orange at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 2022 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
692
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.38. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0186
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Rob Houston, City Manager
FROM: Richard A. Rohm, City Treasurer
Will Kolbow, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director
1. SUBJECT
Annual review and approval of the Statement of Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
Resolution No. 11384.
2. SUMMARY
The Investment Advisory Committee met this past February with the Chandler Investment Services (Chandler), the City’sinvestment management firm. During that meeting, Chandler explained that they conducted an extensive review of the City’scurrent Statement of Investment Policy to bring it up to date with current trends and laws governing public sector investments. They then provided recommendations to further the best interest of the City’s investment strategy. As such, the Investment Advisory Committee reviewed and approved changes to the City’s Statement of Investment Policy.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Resolution No. 11384. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange approving and adopting a Statement of Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 2: Be a fiscally healthy community
b: Analyze future fiscal needs and potential revenue opportunities.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
The California Government Code Section 53646 requires that the Statement of Investment Policy (SIP) be reviewed and approved by the legislative body on an annual basis. The City’sInvestment Policy is one of the most conservative policies in the State and it is proposed that the very conservative features of the policy be maintained. Many of the allowable investments under the State Code are not permitted in the City’spolicy. In addition, the policy puts additional specific limits on U.S. Government Agency investments.
In collaboration with the Investment Advisory Committee (IAC), Chandler Asset Management and staff recently reviewed the City’s investment policy to capture recent changes to California City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
693
Item #: 3.38. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0186
staff recently reviewed the City’s investment policy to capture recent changes to California Government Code (Code) Section 53601 and those areas that govern the investment of public funds.
Staff also reviewed the City’s policy to ensure the inclusion of the latest best practices from recognized industry groups such as Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA), California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO), California Municipal Treasurers Association (CMTA), and the Association of Public Treasurers of the United States and Canada (APTUSC).
The proposed revisions to the SIP have been reviewed and approved by the IAC. It is important to note that one recommended change from Chandler involving SB 998 and negative interest securities was rejected by the IAC and therefore, not included in the recommended changes to the City Council. We believe the recommendations listed below take into consideration the desire to retain the predominant language of a well-written policy yet address best practices for the upcoming year.
These proposed investment policy changes are listed as follows:
· Section 2: Operations and Procedures:
o 2.1 Scope: Recommendation to replace the term CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) with ACFR (Annual Comprehensive Financial Report) to be in line with GFOA recommendation.
o 2.4 Authorized Financial Institutions and Dealers: Recommendation to update the list of authorized institutions to transact business with and update language to include competitive bid process.
· Section 3: Permitted Investments
o 3.1 Investments Authorized
§ Agency Bonds: Recommendation to include the risk management language limiting the number of callable agency securities to 20% and adjust the amount of the purchase of any single issuer to be 30%, in line with Best Practices; § Commercial Paper: Recommendation to increase the limit for commercial paper to be in line with Best Practices and CA government code, as well as up to date with the passing of SB 998
§ Medium Term Notes: Recommendation to increase the maximum concentration of medium term notes to be 30%, in line with Best Practices and CA government code;
§ Permitted investments: Recommendation to include Pass-Through Securities and Supranationals under permitted investments;
§ NRSRO language: Recommendation to update NRSRO language including rating category for Commercial Paper, Medium Term Notes and Municipal City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
694
Item #: 3.38. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0186
Bonds.
o 3.3 Mitigating Risk in the portfolio:
§ Credit Risk: Recommendation to update the downgrade language; § Market Risk: Recommendation to update this section to reduce emphasis on laddering, remove term structure limitations and update language to include comment about improving opportunities.
· Section 4: Reporting, Review and Audits
o 4.1 Monthly Reports: Recommendation to update language as AIMR is no longer valid.
· Glossary: CAM recommends the inclusion of new terms to the Glossary.
7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. 11384
· Statement of Investment Policy
· Statement of Investment Policy - Redline
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
695
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.38. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0186
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Rob Houston, City Manager
FROM: Richard A. Rohm, City Treasurer
Will Kolbow, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director
1. SUBJECT
Annual review and approval of the Statement of Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
Resolution No. 11384.
2. SUMMARY
The Investment Advisory Committee met this past February with the Chandler Investment Services (Chandler), the City’sinvestment management firm. During that meeting, Chandler explained that they conducted an extensive review of the City’scurrent Statement of Investment Policy to bring it up to date with current trends and laws governing public sector investments. They then provided recommendations to further the best interest of the City’s investment strategy. As such, the Investment Advisory Committee reviewed and approved changes to the City’s Statement of Investment Policy.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Resolution No. 11384. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange approving and adopting a Statement of Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 2: Be a fiscally healthy community
b: Analyze future fiscal needs and potential revenue opportunities.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
The California Government Code Section 53646 requires that the Statement of Investment Policy (SIP) be reviewed and approved by the legislative body on an annual basis. The City’sInvestment Policy is one of the most conservative policies in the State and it is proposed that the very conservative features of the policy be maintained. Many of the allowable investments under the State Code are not permitted in the City’spolicy. In addition, the policy puts additional specific limits on U.S. Government Agency investments.
In collaboration with the Investment Advisory Committee (IAC), Chandler Asset Management and staff recently reviewed the City’s investment policy to capture recent changes to California City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
696
Item #: 3.38. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0186
staff recently reviewed the City’s investment policy to capture recent changes to California Government Code (Code) Section 53601 and those areas that govern the investment of public funds.
Staff also reviewed the City’s policy to ensure the inclusion of the latest best practices from recognized industry groups such as Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA), California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO), California Municipal Treasurers Association (CMTA), and the Association of Public Treasurers of the United States and Canada (APTUSC).
The proposed revisions to the SIP have been reviewed and approved by the IAC. It is important to note that one recommended change from Chandler involving SB 998 and negative interest securities was rejected by the IAC and therefore, not included in the recommended changes to the City Council. We believe the recommendations listed below take into consideration the desire to retain the predominant language of a well-written policy yet address best practices for the upcoming year.
These proposed investment policy changes are listed as follows:
· Section 2: Operations and Procedures:
o 2.1 Scope: Recommendation to replace the term CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) with ACFR (Annual Comprehensive Financial Report) to be in line with GFOA recommendation.
o 2.4 Authorized Financial Institutions and Dealers: Recommendation to update the list of authorized institutions to transact business with and update language to include competitive bid process.
· Section 3: Permitted Investments
o 3.1 Investments Authorized
§ Agency Bonds: Recommendation to include the risk management language limiting the number of callable agency securities to 20% and adjust the amount of the purchase of any single issuer to be 30%, in line with Best Practices; § Commercial Paper: Recommendation to increase the limit for commercial paper to be in line with Best Practices and CA government code, as well as up to date with the passing of SB 998
§ Medium Term Notes: Recommendation to increase the maximum concentration of medium term notes to be 30%, in line with Best Practices and CA government code;
§ Permitted investments: Recommendation to include Pass-Through Securities and Supranationals under permitted investments;
§ NRSRO language: Recommendation to update NRSRO language including rating category for Commercial Paper, Medium Term Notes and Municipal City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
697
Item #: 3.38. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0186
Bonds.
o 3.3 Mitigating Risk in the portfolio:
§ Credit Risk: Recommendation to update the downgrade language; § Market Risk: Recommendation to update this section to reduce emphasis on laddering, remove term structure limitations and update language to include comment about improving opportunities.
· Section 4: Reporting, Review and Audits
o 4.1 Monthly Reports: Recommendation to update language as AIMR is no longer valid.
· Glossary: CAM recommends the inclusion of new terms to the Glossary.
7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. 11384
· Statement of Investment Policy
· Statement of Investment Policy - Redline
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
698
RESOLUTION NO. 11384
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ORANGE APPROVING AND
ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT
POLICY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
WHEREAS, California Government Code Sections 53600 et seq. set forth detailed provisions regarding permitted and prohibited investments by cities and accountability therefor ; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11340 on June 8, 2021 , adopting the City’s Statement of Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2021-22 (the “FY 2021-22 SIP”); and
WHEREAS, the FY 2021 -22 SIP requires that the City Council annually review its Statement of Investment Policy and adopt a Statement of Investment Policy within 120 days following the end of each fiscal year by a resolution and vote of the City Council at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the Investment Advisory Committee has reviewed the proposed Statement of Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2022-23 (the “FY 2022-23 SIP”) in the form attached to this Resolution, and has recommended that the City Council adopt the FY 2022-23 SIP.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orange that the FY 2022-23 SIP, in the form attached, is the City’s Statement of Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2022-23 and is duly adopted in accordance with State law and Chapter 2.49 of Title 2 of the Orange Municipal Code.
ADOPTED this ____ day of ____________________ 2022.
Mark A. Murphy, Mayor, City of Orange
ATTEST:
Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
699
2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF ORANGE )
I, PAMELA COLEMAN, City Clerk of the City of Orange, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Orange at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 2022 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
700
Dated: April 12, 2021
CITY OF ORANGE
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
Fiscal Year 2022-23
1.0 INVESTMENT POLICY OVERVIEW
1.1 POLICY
It is the policy of the City of Orange (“City”) to invest public funds in a manner which will provide foremost for the safety of principal while meeting the short- and long-term cash flow demands of the City and conforming to all statutes governing the investment of City funds.
Annually, in accordance with California Government Code (“CGC”) Section 53646, the Treasurer will render to the City Council a Statement of Investment Policy for consideration and approval at a public meeting. Any investment currently held at that time that does not meet the guidelines of this policy, as changed from time to time by the City Council, shall be exempt from the requirements of this policy. However, at the investment’s maturity or liquidation, such funds shall be reinvested only as provided by this policy.
1.2 PURPOSE
This Statement of Investment Policy (“SIP”) is set forth by the City for the following purposes:
a) To establish a clear understanding for the City Council, Investment Committees, City management, responsible employees, citizens and third parties, of the objectives, policies and guidelines for the investment of the City’s idle and surplus funds.
b) To offer guidance to investment staff, brokers and any external investment advisors on the investment of City funds.
1.3 INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES
Within the overriding requirement of compliance with all Federal, State and local laws governing the investment of moneys under the control of the Treasurer, and as specified in the CGC Section 53600.5, when investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling and managing public funds, the primary objectives, in priority order, of the investment activities shall be:
a) Safety: Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program.
Investments of the City shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio.
701
2 b) Liquidity: The investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet all operating requirements which might be reasonably anticipated.
c) Return on Investments: The investment portfolio shall be designed and managed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment objectives, authorized investments and the cash flow needs of the City. The Treasurer’s monthly reports shall include benchmark reporting to define “a market rate of return”; which shall be one of the indices published in a financial journal of wide circulation that are most comparable to the Treasurer’s portfolio. The benchmark shall be used solely as a reference tool. The Treasurer shall not add additional risk to the portfolio in order to attain or exceed the benchmark.
1.4 PRUDENCE
Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs; not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. The standard of prudence to be used by investment officials shall be the “prudent investor” standard (CGC Section 53600.3) and shall be applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio. The Treasurer and other investment employees, acting within the intent and scope of the SIP and other written procedures, and exercising due diligence, shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security’s credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in the immediately following Treasurer’s Report and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments. When a deviation poses a significant risk to the City’s financial position, the City Council shall be notified immediately.
1.5 ETHICS
Elected officials, City officers and employees and any other individuals involved in the investment operations are prohibited from personal business activity that could conflict with the proper execution of the investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions, or which could give the appearance thereof.
Furthermore, these same individuals are prohibited from undertaking personal investment transactions with any individual with whom business is conducted on behalf of the City.
2.0 OPERATIONS AND PROCEDURES
2.1 SCOPE
a) This SIP applies to all financial assets of the City. These funds are accounted for in the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report and include: General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Funds, Capital Project Funds, Enterprise Funds, and Internal Service Funds.
702
3 b) This SIP specifically exempts and does not apply to the following financial assets and investment activities of the City:
(1) The City’s Deferred Compensation Plan is excluded because it is managed by a third party administrator and invested by individual plan participants.
(2) Proceeds of City or other debt issues in possession of a trustee or fiscal agent are not considered to be part of the financial assets covered by this policy. These bond proceeds shall be invested in accordance with the requirements and restrictions outlined in the bond documents.
2.2 DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
a) The City Council’s authority to manage the investment program is derived from CGC Sections 53600 et seq.
b) In accordance with the City of Orange Municipal Code Chapter 2.26, management responsibility for the investment program is hereby delegated to the Treasurer, who shall establish written procedures for the operation of the investment program consistent with this SIP. Under the provision of CGC Section 53600.3, the Treasurer is a trustee and a fiduciary subject to the prudent investor standard.
c) The Treasurer may delegate all, or a portion of, his/her investment authority to a Deputy City Treasurer. Prior to the delegation of the investment authority to a Deputy City Treasurer, the City Treasurer shall notify the City Council and request confirmation of the delegation. Delegation of investment authority will not remove or abridge the Treasurer’s investment responsibility.
d) The City Council may engage the services of one or more external investment managers to assist in the management of the City’s investment portfolio in a manner consistent with the City’s objectives and in accordance with this SIP. Such external managers may provide advice and effectuate trades upon specific authorization for each transaction. Such managers must be registered under the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 and must have not less than five years’ experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized by the CGC Section 53601, and with assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). The Treasurer shall review Form ADV of any investment advisor prior to engagement by the City Council. This Section does not preclude the Treasurer from retaining portfolio consultants within existing authority.
2.3 INVESTMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
a) Chapter 2.50 of the Orange Municipal Code establishes an Investment Oversight Committee (IOC). The terms and provisions of said Chapter 2.50 are incorporated into this SIP by reference as though fully set forth herein. The IOC consists of the Treasurer, the City Manager or designee, and the Director of Finance. The Treasurer is required to 703
4 act as Chair of the IOC, with the City Manager as Vice Chair. The IOC is required to act by majority vote.
b) The IOC shall, at least annually and more often if directed by the City Council or agreed by a majority of the IOC, review the City Council’s adopted SIP and report to the City Council its recommendations for any changes, additions or deletions to the SIP.
c) The IOC shall monitor the implementation of the City Council’s adopted SIP and annually submit a compliance report to the City Council.
d) The IOC shall review reports to the City Council from the Investment Advisory Committee and prepare responses as required.
e) The IOC shall meet and report quarterly to the City Council summarizing the IOC meetings and the recommendations of the Investment Advisory Committee. Such report shall contain an unedited copy of the Investment Advisory Committee’s recommendations.
2.4 AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND DEALERS
a) Institutions eligible to transact investment business with the City shall include only the following:
(1) Primary government dealers as designated by the Federal Reserve Bank and non-primary government dealers;
(2) Nationally or state-chartered banks;
(3) The Federal Reserve Bank;
(4) Direct issuers of securities eligible for purchase by the City; (5) Institutions licensed by the state as a broker-dealer; and (6) Institutions that are members of a federally regulated securities exchange.
b) Selection of financial institutions and broker/dealers authorized to engage in transactions with the City shall be at the sole discretion of the City Treasurer. The Treasurer will maintain a list of financial institutions authorized to provide investment services to the City.
c) The City Treasurer shall obtain information from qualified financial institutions to determine if the institution makes markets in securities appropriate for the City’s needs, can assign qualified sales representatives and can provide written agreements to abide by the conditions set forth in the City of Orange SIP.
Investment accounts with all financial institutions shall be standard non- discretionary accounts and may not be margin accounts.
d) All financial institutions which desire to become qualified bidders for investment transactions must supply the Treasurer with the following:
704
5 (1) Audited financial statements for the institution’s three most recent fiscal years;
(2) At least three references from California local agencies whose portfolio size, investment objectives and risk preferences are similar to the City’s;
(3) A statement certifying that the institution has reviewed the CGC Sections 53600 et seq. and the City’s SIP, and that all securities offered to the City shall comply fully and in every instance with all provisions of the Code and with this SIP; and,
(4) Completed Broker/Dealer Questionnaire.
e) The Treasurer shall conduct an annual review of the financial condition of qualified institutions. In addition, a current financial statement is required to be on file for each qualified institution.
f) Public deposits shall be made only in qualified public depositories within the State of California as established by State law. Deposits shall be insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or, to the extent the amount exceeds the insured maximum, shall be collateralized with securities in accordance with State law.
g) Selection of broker/dealers used by an external investment adviser retained by the City will be at the sole discretion of the adviser. Where possible, transactions with broker/dealers shall be selected on a competitive basis and their bid or offering prices shall be recorded. If there is no other readily available competitive offering, best efforts will be made to document quotations for comparable or alternative securities. When purchasing original issue instrumentality securities, no competitive offerings will be required as all dealers in the selling group offer those securities at the same original issue price.
2.5 COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS
CGC Sections 53652 and 53667 require depositories to post certain types and levels of collateral for public funds on deposit above the FDIC insurance amounts. The collateral requirements apply to bank deposits, both active (checking and savings accounts) and inactive (non-negotiable time certificates of deposit).
2.6 SAFEKEEPING AND DELIVERY
a) To protect against fraud, embezzlement, or losses caused by collapse of individual securities dealers, all securities owned by the City shall be held in safekeeping by the City’s custodial bank, a third party bank trust department, acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement, and shall be evidenced by safekeeping receipts.
705
6 b) All security transactions entered into by the City shall be conducted on a standard delivery-versus-payment (DVP) basis, which ensures that securities are deposited with the third party custodian prior to the release of funds. All securities purchased or acquired shall be delivered to the City by book entry, physical delivery or by third party custodial agreement as required by CGC Section 53601. Investments in the State Pool or money market mutual funds are undeliverable, and are not subject to delivery or third party safekeeping requirements.
c) On a daily basis, investment trades shall be verified against the bank transactions and broker confirmation tickets to ensure accuracy. On a monthly basis, the custodial asset statement is reconciled with the month end portfolio holdings. On an annual basis, the external auditor confirms investment holdings.
3.0 PERMITTED INVESTMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT
3.1 INVESTMENTS AUTHORIZED
The City, as empowered by CGC Sections 53601 et seq. and 16429.1, hereby authorizes the City Treasurer to select investments from among the following:
(1) United States Treasury notes, bonds, bills or certificates of indebtedness, or those for which the faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest. (Limits: Maximum maturity at purchase 5 years; no other limits.)
(2) Obligations issued by banks for cooperatives, federal land banks, federal intermediate credit banks, the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Federal National Mortgage Association, or other instruments of, or issued by, a federal agency or a United States government-sponsored enterprise. In every case, any issue purchased must be fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the United States, or the issuing federal agency. (Limits: Maximum maturity at purchase 5 years; maximum concentration 75% of portfolio at time of purchase with no more than 30% of total portfolio in any single agency, the maximum percent of agency callable securities in the portfolio will be 20%, and excluding completely Government National Mortgage Association bonds; i.e., GNMA’s.)
(3) Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies that are Money Market Mutual Funds, registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940 investing in the securities and obligations authorized by CGC Sections 53601(b) and (e) only (i.e., U.S.
Government issues only). Such Funds must either carry the highest rating of at least two of the three largest national rating agencies, or such funds must have retained an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five year’s experience managing money market mutual funds with 706
7 assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). (Limits: maximum 90 days Weighted Average Maturity; maximum concentration $15 million, or 20%, of portfolio, whichever is less.)
(4) State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is permitted, with the knowledge that the fund may invest in some vehicles allowed by statute but not otherwise authorized by the City Council in this SIP. The Treasurer shall obtain from the State Treasurer, no less than quarterly, reports providing sufficient detail to adequately judge the risk inherent in the LAIF portfolio, and shall inform the City Council immediately of any risks noted that may warrant reconsideration of this investment vehicle. (Limits: $75 million per account as of 1/1/2020.) (5) Investment in new Government sponsored pools will be subject to due diligence. A thorough investigation of the pool is required prior to investing, and on a continual basis.
(6) Funds held under the terms of a Trust Indenture or other contract or debt issuance agreement may be invested according to the provisions of those indentures or agreements.
(7) Certificates of Deposit approved by the California AB 2011 are permitted. (Limits:
The bill allows investment up to January 1, 2021; a maximum concentration 30% of total portfolio.)
(8) Commercial Paper of prime quality in the highest credit category by a nationally recognized statistical ratings organization (NRSRO) issued by a domestic corporation having assets in excess of $500,000,000 and rated in the category of “A” or better by a NRSRO on its debt other than commercial paper as provided by a national rating agency. (Limits: Maximum maturity of 270 days or less; maximum concentration 25% of portfolio may be invested in Commercial Paper. Under a provision sunsetting on January 1, 2026, no more than 40% of the portfolio may be invested in Commercial Paper if the Agency’s investment assets under management are greater than $100,000,000; no more than 5% of the book value of the portfolio funds to a single issuer at time of purchase.)
(9) Medium-term notes issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States. (Limits: Maximum maturity at purchase 5 years; must be rated in the category of “A” or better by a NRSRO; maximum concentration 30% of portfolio and no more than 5% of the book value of the portfolio funds to a single issuer at time of purchase.)
(10) Municipal bonds include obligations issued by the State of California and any local agency within the state of California, and registered bonds of any of the other 49 707
8 states in addition to California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue producing property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or local agency or by a department, board, agency, or authority of a state or local agency. (Limits: Maximum maturity at purchase 5 years; must be rated in the category of “A” or better by a NRSRO; maximum concentration 20% of portfolio and no more than 5% of the book value of the portfolio funds to a single issuer at time of purchase.)
(11) Asset-Backed, Mortgage-Backed, Mortgage Pass-Through Securities, and Collateralized Mortgage Obligations limited to mortgage-backed pass-through securities issued by a US government agency or consumer receivable pass-through certificates or bonds. (Limits. Maximum maturity at purchase of 5 years ; the securities are rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or higher by a NRSRO, The aggregate investment in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities described in this section shall not exceed 20% of the portfolio; no more than 5% held in any one issuer that is not a US government agency.) (12) Supranational securities, senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International Finance Corporation, or Inter-American Development Bank which are eligible for purchase in the United States. (Limits: Maximum remaining maturity of five years or less; Investments under this subdivision shall be rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or higher by a NRSRO ; maximum concentration of 30% of the portfolio with no more than 10% invested in any one issuer.)
3.2 PROHIBITED INVESTMENT VEHICLES AND PRACTICES
The City Treasurer is prohibited from the following:
a) Borrowing for investment purposes (“Leverage”) is prohibited.
b) Buying or selling securities “on Margin” is prohibited.
c) Investing in any instrument, which is commonly known as a “derivative” instrument (options, futures, swaps, caps, floors, collars, U.S. Treasury zero coupon bonds, U.S. Treasury strips, interest only bonds, interest-only strips derived from mortgage pools), or any investment that may result in a zero interest accrual, even if held to maturity, is prohibited.
d) Under the provisions of CGC Sections 53601.6 and 53631.5, the City shall not invest any funds covered by this SIP in instruments known as Structured Notes (e.g. inverse floaters, leverage floaters, structured CD’s, range notes, equity-linked securities). Any such investments are prohibited.
708
9 e) Trading securities for the sole purpose of speculating on the future direction of interest rates is prohibited.
f) State law notwithstanding, any investments not specifically described herein under Subsections 3.1 a) through 3.1 c) are prohibited.
3.3 MITIGATING RISK IN THE PORTFOLIO
a) Credit Risk:
(1) The City will diversify its investments in accordance with the limits set forth in Subsection 3.1 of this SIP to diminish the credit risk resulting from concentrations.
(2) The City, on occasion, may sell a security prior to its maturity (recording a gain or loss) in order to improve the risk structure, liquidity and yield of the portfolio in response to market conditions.
(3) If any security owned by the City is downgraded to a level below the requirements of this policy, making it ineligible for additional purchases, it shall be the City’s policy to review immediately the credit situation and make a determination as to whether to sell or retain such securities in the portfolio. If the highest credit rating of a security is downgraded one notch below the quality required in this investment policy, it will be considered acceptable to retain such downgraded security in the portfolio and its presence in the portfolio will be reported to the City Council and monitored continuously for further information. If the highest credit rating of a security is rated two grades below the required minimum rating, it will trigger an automatic sale of such downgraded security.
b) Market Risk: While the City recognizes that longer term portfolios achieve higher returns, longer term portfolios have higher volatility of total return. The City will limit market risk by limiting the concentrations, volume and duration of its longer term investments, as well as limiting them to funds which are not needed for current year cash flow purposes.
(1) Maturities selected shall provide for stability of income and liquidity, and shall not exceed 5 years from the date of purchase. Funds not required for purposes of meeting specific cash flow needs shall be invested in permitted securities so that securities will mature periodically across the maturity spectrum with a maximum of five years.
(2) The City may, on occasion, sell a security prior to its maturity (recording a gain or loss) in order to diminish the portfolio’s exposure to market risk or reinvest into a better opportunity providing more potential earning to the City’s portfolio.
709
10 4.0 REPORTING, REVIEW AND AUDITS
4.1 MONTHLY REPORTS
a) The Treasurer shall submit three monthly investment reports to the City Council, and they shall be submitted within 45 days following the end of the quarter. The monthly reports shall include a complete description of the portfolio, the type of investments, the issuers, maturity dates, par and dollar amounts invested on all securities, the current market values of each component of the portfolio, the source of the portfolio valuation, investments and moneys held by the City, and shall additionally include a description of any of the City’s funds, investments, or programs, that are under the management of contracted parties, including lending programs.
b) The report shall also include performance measures as recommended by the CFA Institute’s Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). These shall include a presentation of Total Return using accrual accounting, and a Time-weighted Rate of Return using a monthly valuation and one of the GIPS approved methods of calculation. The report shall also include a presentation of Yield to Maturity.
c) The report shall also include the performance of the benchmark described in Subsection 1.3 c) of this SIP as a basis of comparison for the City’s portfolio.
d) The report shall also include the following certifications:
(1) All investment actions executed since the last report have been made in full compliance with the SIP.
(2) The City will meet its expenditure obligations for the next six months is required by CGC Sections 53646(b)(2) and (3).
4.2 INTERNAL CONTROLS
The Treasurer is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the City are protected from loss, theft or misuse. The internal control structure shall be designed to provide reasonable assurance that these objectives are met. Internal controls shall be in writing and shall address the following points: separation of transaction authority from accounting and record keeping, safekeeping of assets and written confirmation of telephone transactions for investments and wire transfers.
4.3 ANNUAL AUDIT
The Treasurer shall insure that the City’s annual process of independent review by an external auditor will include an appropriate investment review to assure compliance with this policy and acceptable internal controls. The audit shall be presented to the City Council upon its completion.
4.4 SPECIAL AUDITS
The City Council may at any time order an audit of the investment portfolio and/or the Treasurer’s investment practices.
710
11 5.0 INVESTMENT POLICY ADOPTION
The SIP shall be reviewed annually by the City Council for consistency with the City’s overall investment objectives regarding preservation of principal, liquidity, return, relevance to current law as well as to current financial and economic trends. Any modifications necessary must be approved separately by the City Council. The SIP shall then be adopted in its entirety, as amended, within 120 days of the fiscal year end by resolution and vote of the City Council at a public meeting.
5.1 INVESTMENT POLICY CERTIFICATION
The 1999-2000 version of this investment policy was certified by the Municipal Treasurer’s Association of the United States and Canada, in June 2000. Recommended changes have been incorporated. In the event of any significant changes in legislation that will require significant changes to the SIP, the City will resubmit the new policy for re-certification.
711
12 GLOSSARY
AGENCIES: Federal agency securities
ASKED: The price at which securities are offered.
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES: Securities supported by pools of installment loans or leases or by pools of revolving lines of credit.
BANKERS’ ACCEPTANCE (BA): A draft or bill or exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill, as well as the issuer.
BENCHMARK: A segment of the securities market with characteristics similar to the subject portfolio. It is used to compare portfolio performance to the performance of the appropriate segment of the market. (e.g. 1-Year T-Bill rate)
BID: The price offered by a buyer of securities. (When you are selling securities, you ask for a bid.) See Offer.
BROKER: A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a commission.
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT (CD): A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a certificate. Large-denomination CD’s are typically negotiable.
COLLATERAL: Securities, evidence of deposit or other property, which a borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposits of public moneys.
COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS (CMO): Classes of bonds that redistribute the cash flows of mortgage securities (and whole loans) to create securities that have different levels of prepayment risk, as compared to the underlying mortgage securities.
COMMERCIAL PAPER: Short-term, negotiable unsecured promissory notes of corporations.
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT: The official annual report for the City of Orange. It includes five combined statements for each individual fund and account group prepared in conformity with GAAP. It also includes supporting schedules necessary to demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal and contractual provisions, extensive introductory material, and a detailed Statistical Section.
COUPON: (a) The annual rate of interest that a bond’s issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond’s face value. (b) A certificate attached to a bond evidencing interest due on a payment date.
712
13 DEALER: A dealer, as opposed to a broker, acts as a principal in all transactions, buying and selling for his own account.
DEBENTURE: A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer.
DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENT: There are two methods of delivery of securities: delivery versus payment and delivery versus receipt. Delivery versus payment is delivery of securities with an exchange of money for the securities. Delivery versus receipt is delivery of securities with an exchange of a signed receipt for the securities.
DISCOUNT: The difference between the cost price of a security and its maturity when quoted at lower than face value. A security selling below original offering price shortly after sale also is considered to be at a discount.
DISCOUNT SECURITIES: Non-interest bearing money market instruments that are issued a discount and redeemed at maturity for full face value; e.g., US Treasury Bills.
DIVERSIFICATION: Dividing investment funds among a variety of securities offering independent returns.
FEDERAL CREDIT AGENCIES: Agencies of the Federal government set up to supply credit to various classes of institutions and individuals; e.g., S&L’s, small business firms, students, farmers, farm cooperatives, and exporters.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (FDIC): A Federal agency that insures bank deposits, currently up to $250,000 per deposit.
FEDERAL FUNDS RATE: The rate of interest at which Federal funds are traded. This rate is currently pegged by the Federal Reserve through open-market operations.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS (FHLB): The institutions that regulate and lend to savings and loan associations. The Federal Home Loan banks play a role analogous to that played by the Federal Reserve Banks vis-à-vis member commercial banks.
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FNMA): FNMA, like GNMA, was chartered under the Federal National Mortgage Association Act in 1938. FNMA is a federal corporation working under the auspices of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). It is the largest single provider of residential mortgage funds in the United States.
Fannie Mae, as the corporation is called, is a private stockholder-owned corporation. The corporations’ purchases include a variety of adjustable mortgages and second loans. In addition to fixed-rate mortgages. FNMA’s securities are also highly liquid and are widely accepted. 713
14 FNMA assumes and guarantees that all security holders will receive timely payment of principal and interest.
FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE (FOMC): Consists of seven members of the Federal Reserve Board and five of the twelve Federal Reserve Bank Presidents. The President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is a permanent member, while the other Presidents serve on a rotating basis. The committee periodically meets to set Federal Reserve guidelines regarding purchases and sales of Government Securities in the open market as a means of influencing the volume of bank credit and money.
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM: The central bank of the United States created by Congress and consisting of a seven member Board of Governors in Washington, DC, 12 regional banks and about 5,700 commercial banks that are members of the system.
GLOBAL INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: Created by the CFA Institute, a global association for investment management professionals, and are governed by the GIPS Executive Committee. Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS) are a set of voluntary standards used by investment managers throughout the world to ensure the full disclosure and fair representation of their investment performance. The goal of the standards is to make it possible for investors to compare one firm’s performance against that of another firm.
GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (GNMA or Ginnie Mae):
Securities influencing the volume of bank credit guaranteed by GNMA and issued by mortgage banks, commercial banks, savings and loan associations, and other institutions. Security holder is protected by full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Ginnie Mae securities are backed by the FHA, VA or FMHM mortgages. The term “pass-throughs” is often used to describe Ginnie Maes.
LEVERAGE: Borrowing funds in order to invest in securities that have the potential to pay earnings at a rate higher than the cost of borrowing.
LIQUIDITY: A liquid asset is one that can be converted easily and rapidly into cash without a substantial loss of value. In the money market, a security is said to be liquid if the spread between bid and asked prices is narrow and reasonable size can be done at those quotes.
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF): A pooled investment vehicle for local agencies in California sponsored by the State of California and administered by the State Treasurer.
MARGIN: The difference between the market value of a security and the loan a broker makes using that security as collateral.
714
15 MARKET CYCLE: A market cycle is defined as a period of time which includes a minimum of two consecutive quarters of falling interest rates followed by a minimum of two consecutive quarters of rising interest rates.
MARKET VALUE: The price at which a security is traded and could presumably be purchased or sold.
MATURITY: The date upon which the principal or states value of an investment becomes due and payable.
MEDIUM TERM NOTES: Unsecured, investment-grade senior debt securities of major corporations which are sold in relatively small amounts on either a continuous or an intermittent basis. MTNs are highly flexible debt instruments that can be structured to respond to market opportunities or to investor preferences.
MONEY MARKET: The market in which short-term debt instruments (bills, commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances, etc.) are issued and traded.
MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUND: A mutual fund that invests exclusively in short-term securities. Examples of investments in money market funds are certificates of deposit and U.S.
Treasury securities. Money market funds attempt to keep their net asset values at $1 per share.
MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH SECURITIES: A securitized participation in the interest and principal cash flows from a specified pool of mortgages. Principal and interest payments made on the mortgages are passed through to the holder of the security
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES: Securities issued by state and local agencies to finance capital and operating expenses.
MUTUAL FUND: An entity which pools the funds of investors and invests those funds in a set of securities which is specifically defined in the fund’s prospectus. Mutual funds can be invested in various types of domestic and/or international stocks, bonds, and money market instruments, as set forth in the individual fund’s prospectus. For most large, institutional investors, the costs associated with investing in mutual funds are higher than the investor can obtain through an individually managed portfolio.
NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED STATISTICAL RATING ORGANIZATION (NRSRO):
A credit rating agency that the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States uses for regulatory purposes. Credit rating agencies provide assessments of an investment's risk. The issuers of investments, especially debt securities, pay credit rating agencies to provide them with ratings. The three most prominent NRSROs are Fitch, S&P, and Moody's.
715
16 NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT: A large denomination certificate of deposit which can be sold in the open market prior to maturity.
OFFER: The price asked by a seller of securities. (When you are buying securities, you ask for an offer.) See Asked and Bid.
PORTFOLIO: Collection of securities held by an investor.
PRIMARY DEALER: group of government securities dealers who submit daily reports of market activity and positions and monthly financial statements to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Primary dealers include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)-registered securities broker-dealers, banks, and a few unregulated firms.
PRUDENT INVESTOR STANDARD: Governing bodies of local agencies or persons authorized to make investment decisions on behalf of those local agencies investing public funds pursuant to CGC Sections 53600 et seq. are trustees and therefore fiduciaries subject to the prudent investor standard. When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling, and managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the agency. Within the limitations of the CGC Sections 53600 et seq. and considering individual investments as part to an overall strategy, a trustee is authorized to acquire investments as authorized by law.
QUALIFIED PUBLIC DEPOSITORIES: A financial institution which does not claim exemption from the payment of any sale or compensating use or ad valorem taxes under the laws of this state, which has aggregated for the benefit of the commission eligible collateral having a value of not less than its maximum liability and which has been approved by the Public Deposit Protection Commission to hold public deposits.
SAFEKEEPING: A service to customers rendered by banks for a fee whereby securities and valuables of all types and descriptions are held in the bank’s vaults for protection.
SECONDARY MARKET: A market made for the purchase and sale of outstanding issues following the initial distribution.
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION: Agency created by Congress to protect investors in securities transactions by administering securities legislation.
SUPRANATIONAL: A Supranational is a multi-national organization whereby member states transcend national boundaries or interests to share in the decision making to promote economic development in the member countries.
716
17 TIME CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT: A non-negotiable certificate of deposit which cannot be sold prior to maturity.
TOTAL RATE OF RETURN: Represents growth (or decline) in the value of a portfolio, including both capital appreciation and income, as a proportion of the starting market value.
TIME-WEIGHTED RATE OF RETURN: A modified measurement of Total rate of Return which eliminates the effect of the timing of funds flows to and/or from a security or portfolio.
TREASURY BILLS: A non-interest bearing discount security issued by the U.S. Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in three months, six months, or one year.
TREASURY BOND: Long-term U.S. Treasury securities having initial maturities of more than 10 years.
TREASURY NOTES: A non-interest bearing discount security issued by the US Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in one, two, three, five or ten years.
YIELD: The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed as a percentage.
YIELD TO MATURITY is the calculated rate of return based upon the present value of the cash flow from each interest payment, plus the present value of the cash flow from the investment’s redemption value at maturity vs. the purchase price.
717
Dated: April 12, 2021
CITY OF ORANGE
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
Fiscal Year 2022-23
1.0 INVESTMENT POLICY OVERVIEW
1.1 POLICY
It is the policy of the City of Orange (“City”) to invest public funds in a manner which will provide foremost for the safety of principal while meeting the short- and long-term cash flow demands of the City and conforming to all statutes governing the investment of City funds.
Annually, in accordance with California Government Code (“CGC”) Section 53646, the Treasurer will render to the City Council a Statement of Investment Policy for consideration and approval at a public meeting. Any investment currently held at that time that does not meet the guidelines of this policy, as changed from time to time by the City Council, shall be exempt from the requirements of this policy. However, at the investment’s maturity or liquidation, such funds shall be reinvested only as provided by this policy.
1.2 PURPOSE
This Statement of Investment Policy (“SIP”) is set forth by the City for the following purposes:
a) To establish a clear understanding for the City Council, Investment Committees, City management, responsible employees, citizens and third parties, of the objectives, policies and guidelines for the investment of the City’s idle and surplus funds.
b) To offer guidance to investment staff, brokers and any external investment advisors on the investment of City funds.
1.3 INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES
Within the overriding requirement of compliance with all Federal, State and local laws governing the investment of moneys under the control of the Treasurer, and as specified in the CGC Section 53600.5, when investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling and managing public funds, the primary objectives, in priority order, of the investment activities shall be:
a) Safety: Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program.
Investments of the City shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio.
718
2 b) Liquidity: The investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet all operating requirements which might be reasonably anticipated.
c) Return on Investments: The investment portfolio shall be designed and managed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment objectives, authorized investments and the cash flow needs of the City. The Treasurer’s monthly reports shall include benchmark reporting to define “a market rate of return”; which shall be one of the indices published in a financial journal of wide circulation that are most comparable to the Treasurer’s portfolio. The benchmark shall be used solely as a reference tool. The Treasurer shall not add additional risk to the portfolio in order to attain or exceed the benchmark.
1.4 PRUDENCE
Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs; not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. The standard of prudence to be used by investment officials shall be the “prudent investor” standard (CGC Section 53600.3) and shall be applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio. The Treasurer and other investment employees, acting within the intent and scope of the SIP and other written procedures, and exercising due diligence, shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security’s credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in the immediately following Treasurer’s Report and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments. When a deviation poses a significant risk to the City’s financial position, the City Council shall be notified immediately.
1.5 ETHICS
Elected officials, City officers and employees and any other individuals involved in the investment operations are prohibited from personal business activity that could conflict with the proper execution of the investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions, or which could give the appearance thereof.
Furthermore, these same individuals are prohibited from undertaking personal investment transactions with any individual with whom business is conducted on behalf of the City.
2.0 OPERATIONS AND PROCEDURES
2.1 SCOPE
a) This SIP applies to all financial assets of the City. These funds are accounted for in the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report and include: General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Funds, Capital Project Funds, Enterprise Funds, and Internal Service Funds.
719
3 b) This SIP specifically exempts and does not apply to the following financial assets and investment activities of the City:
(1) The City’s Deferred Compensation Plan is excluded because it is managed by a third party administrator and invested by individual plan participants.
(2) Proceeds of City or other debt issues in possession of a trustee or fiscal agent are not considered to be part of the financial assets covered by this policy. These bond proceeds shall be invested in accordance with the requirements and restrictions outlined in the bond documents.
2.2 DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
a) The City Council’s authority to manage the investment program is derived from CGC Sections 53600 et seq.
b) In accordance with the City of Orange Municipal Code Chapter 2.26, management responsibility for the investment program is hereby delegated to the Treasurer, who shall establish written procedures for the operation of the investment program consistent with this SIP. Under the provision of CGC Section 53600.3, the Treasurer is a trustee and a fiduciary subject to the prudent investor standard.
c) The Treasurer may delegate all, or a portion of, his/her investment authority to a Deputy City Treasurer. Prior to the delegation of the investment authority to a Deputy City Treasurer, the City Treasurer shall notify the City Council and request confirmation of the delegation. Delegation of investment authority will not remove or abridge the Treasurer’s investment responsibility.
d) The City Council may engage the services of one or more external investment managers to assist in the management of the City’s investment portfolio in a manner consistent with the City’s objectives and in accordance with this SIP. Such external managers may provide advice and effectuate trades upon specific authorization for each transaction. Such managers must be registered under the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 and must have not less than five years’ experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized by the CGC Section 53601, and with assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). The Treasurer shall review Form ADV of any investment advisor prior to engagement by the City Council. This Section does not preclude the Treasurer from retaining portfolio consultants within existing authority.
2.3 INVESTMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
a) Chapter 2.50 of the Orange Municipal Code establishes an Investment Oversight Committee (IOC). The terms and provisions of said Chapter 2.50 are incorporated into this SIP by reference as though fully set forth herein. The IOC consists of the Treasurer, the City Manager or designee, and the Director of Finance. The Treasurer is required to 720
4 act as Chair of the IOC, with the City Manager as Vice Chair. The IOC is required to act by majority vote.
b) The IOC shall, at least annually and more often if directed by the City Council or agreed by a majority of the IOC, review the City Council’s adopted SIP and report to the City Council its recommendations for any changes, additions or deletions to the SIP.
c) The IOC shall monitor the implementation of the City Council’s adopted SIP and annually submit a compliance report to the City Council.
d) The IOC shall review reports to the City Council from the Investment Advisory Committee and prepare responses as required.
e) The IOC shall meet and report quarterly to the City Council summarizing the IOC meetings and the recommendations of the Investment Advisory Committee. Such report shall contain an unedited copy of the Investment Advisory Committee’s recommendations.
2.4 AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND DEALERS
a) Institutions eligible to transact investment business with the City shall include only the following:
(1) Primary government dealers as designated by the Federal Reserve Bank and non-primary government dealers;
(2) Nationally or state-chartered banks;
(3) The Federal Reserve Bank;
(4) Direct issuers of securities eligible for purchase by the City; (5) Institutions licensed by the state as a broker-dealer; and (6) Institutions that are members of a federally regulated securities exchange.
b) Selection of financial institutions and broker/dealers authorized to engage in transactions with the City shall be at the sole discretion of the City Treasurer. The Treasurer will maintain a list of financial institutions authorized to provide investment services to the City.
c) The City Treasurer shall obtain information from qualified financial institutions to determine if the institution makes markets in securities appropriate for the City’s needs, can assign qualified sales representatives and can provide written agreements to abide by the conditions set forth in the City of Orange SIP.
Investment accounts with all financial institutions shall be standard non- discretionary accounts and may not be margin accounts.
d) All financial institutions which desire to become qualified bidders for investment transactions must supply the Treasurer with the following:
721
5 (1) Audited financial statements for the institution’s three most recent fiscal years;
(2) At least three references from California local agencies whose portfolio size, investment objectives and risk preferences are similar to the City’s;
(3) A statement certifying that the institution has reviewed the CGC Sections 53600 et seq. and the City’s SIP, and that all securities offered to the City shall comply fully and in every instance with all provisions of the Code and with this SIP; and,
(4) Completed Broker/Dealer Questionnaire.
e) The Treasurer shall conduct an annual review of the financial condition of qualified institutions. In addition, a current financial statement is required to be on file for each qualified institution.
f) Public deposits shall be made only in qualified public depositories within the State of California as established by State law. Deposits shall be insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or, to the extent the amount exceeds the insured maximum, shall be collateralized with securities in accordance with State law.
g) Selection of broker/dealers used by an external investment adviser retained by the City will be at the sole discretion of the adviser. Where possible, transactions with broker/dealers shall be selected on a competitive basis and their bid or offering prices shall be recorded. If there is no other readily available competitive offering, best efforts will be made to document quotations for comparable or alternative securities. When purchasing original issue instrumentality securities, no competitive offerings will be required as all dealers in the selling group offer those securities at the same original issue price.
2.5 COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS
CGC Sections 53652 and 53667 require depositories to post certain types and levels of collateral for public funds on deposit above the FDIC insurance amounts. The collateral requirements apply to bank deposits, both active (checking and savings accounts) and inactive (non-negotiable time certificates of deposit).
2.6 SAFEKEEPING AND DELIVERY
a) To protect against fraud, embezzlement, or losses caused by collapse of individual securities dealers, all securities owned by the City shall be held in safekeeping by the City’s custodial bank, a third party bank trust department, acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement, and shall be evidenced by safekeeping receipts.
722
6 b) All security transactions entered into by the City shall be conducted on a standard delivery-versus-payment (DVP) basis, which ensures that securities are deposited with the third party custodian prior to the release of funds. All securities purchased or acquired shall be delivered to the City by book entry, physical delivery or by third party custodial agreement as required by CGC Section 53601. Investments in the State Pool or money market mutual funds are undeliverable, and are not subject to delivery or third party safekeeping requirements.
c) On a daily basis, investment trades shall be verified against the bank transactions and broker confirmation tickets to ensure accuracy. On a monthly basis, the custodial asset statement is reconciled with the month end portfolio holdings. On an annual basis, the external auditor confirms investment holdings.
3.0 PERMITTED INVESTMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT
3.1 INVESTMENTS AUTHORIZED
The City, as empowered by CGC Sections 53601 et seq. and 16429.1, hereby authorizes the City Treasurer to select investments from among the following:
(1) United States Treasury notes, bonds, bills or certificates of indebtedness, or those for which the faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest. (Limits: Maximum maturity at purchase 5 years; no other limits.)
(2) Obligations issued by banks for cooperatives, federal land banks, federal intermediate credit banks, the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Federal National Mortgage Association, or other instruments of, or issued by, a federal agency or a United States government-sponsored enterprise. In every case, any issue purchased must be fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the United States, or the issuing federal agency. (Limits: Maximum maturity at purchase 5 years; maximum concentration 75% of portfolio at time of purchase with no more than 30% of total portfolio in any single agency, the maximum percent of agency callable securities in the portfolio will be 20%, and excluding completely Government National Mortgage Association bonds; i.e., GNMA’s.)
(3) Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies that are Money Market Mutual Funds, registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940 investing in the securities and obligations authorized by CGC Sections 53601(b) and (e) only (i.e., U.S.
Government issues only). Such Funds must either carry the highest rating of at least two of the three largest national rating agencies, or such funds must have retained an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five year’s experience managing money market mutual funds with 723
7 assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). (Limits: maximum 90 days Weighted Average Maturity; maximum concentration $15 million, or 20%, of portfolio, whichever is less.)
(4) State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is permitted, with the knowledge that the fund may invest in some vehicles allowed by statute but not otherwise authorized by the City Council in this SIP. The Treasurer shall obtain from the State Treasurer, no less than quarterly, reports providing sufficient detail to adequately judge the risk inherent in the LAIF portfolio, and shall inform the City Council immediately of any risks noted that may warrant reconsideration of this investment vehicle. (Limits: $75 million per account as of 1/1/2020.) (5) Investment in new Government sponsored pools will be subject to due diligence. A thorough investigation of the pool is required prior to investing, and on a continual basis.
(6) Funds held under the terms of a Trust Indenture or other contract or debt issuance agreement may be invested according to the provisions of those indentures or agreements.
(7) Certificates of Deposit approved by the California AB 2011 are permitted. (Limits:
The bill allows investment up to January 1, 2021; a maximum concentration 30% of total portfolio.)
(8) Commercial Paper of prime quality in the highest credit category by a nationally recognized statistical ratings organization (NRSRO) issued by a domestic corporation having assets in excess of $500,000,000 and rated in the category of “A” or better by a NRSRO on its debt other than commercial paper as provided by a national rating agency. (Limits: Maximum maturity of 270 days or less; maximum concentration 25% of portfolio may be invested in Commercial Paper. Under a provision sunsetting on January 1, 2026, no more than 40% of the portfolio may be invested in Commercial Paper if the Agency’s investment assets under management are greater than $100,000,000; no more than 5% of the book value of the portfolio funds to a single issuer at time of purchase.)
(9) Medium-term notes issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States. (Limits: Maximum maturity at purchase 5 years; must be rated in the category of “A” or better by a NRSRO; maximum concentration 30% of portfolio and no more than 5% of the book value of the portfolio funds to a single issuer at time of purchase.)
(10) Municipal bonds include obligations issued by the State of California and any local agency within the state of California, and registered bonds of any of the other 49 724
8 states in addition to California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue producing property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or local agency or by a department, board, agency, or authority of a state or local agency. (Limits: Maximum maturity at purchase 5 years; must be rated in the category of “A” or better by a NRSRO; maximum concentration 20% of portfolio and no more than 5% of the book value of the portfolio funds to a single issuer at time of purchase.)
(11) Asset-Backed, Mortgage-Backed, Mortgage Pass-Through Securities, and Collateralized Mortgage Obligations limited to mortgage-backed pass-through securities issued by a US government agency or consumer receivable pass-through certificates or bonds. (Limits. Maximum maturity at purchase of 5 years ; the securities are rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or higher by a NRSRO, The aggregate investment in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities described in this section shall not exceed 20% of the portfolio; no more than 5% held in any one issuer that is not a US government agency.) (12) Supranational securities, senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International Finance Corporation, or Inter-American Development Bank which are eligible for purchase in the United States. (Limits: Maximum remaining maturity of five years or less; Investments under this subdivision shall be rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or higher by a NRSRO ; maximum concentration of 30% of the portfolio with no more than 10% invested in any one issuer.)
3.2 PROHIBITED INVESTMENT VEHICLES AND PRACTICES
The City Treasurer is prohibited from the following:
a) Borrowing for investment purposes (“Leverage”) is prohibited.
b) Buying or selling securities “on Margin” is prohibited.
c) Investing in any instrument, which is commonly known as a “derivative” instrument (options, futures, swaps, caps, floors, collars, U.S. Treasury zero coupon bonds, U.S. Treasury strips, interest only bonds, interest-only strips derived from mortgage pools), or any investment that may result in a zero interest accrual, even if held to maturity, is prohibited.
d) Under the provisions of CGC Sections 53601.6 and 53631.5, the City shall not invest any funds covered by this SIP in instruments known as Structured Notes (e.g. inverse floaters, leverage floaters, structured CD’s, range notes, equity-linked securities). Any such investments are prohibited.
725
9 e) Trading securities for the sole purpose of speculating on the future direction of interest rates is prohibited.
f) State law notwithstanding, any investments not specifically described herein under Subsections 3.1 a) through 3.1 c) are prohibited.
3.3 MITIGATING RISK IN THE PORTFOLIO
a) Credit Risk:
(1) The City will diversify its investments in accordance with the limits set forth in Subsection 3.1 of this SIP to diminish the credit risk resulting from concentrations.
(2) The City, on occasion, may sell a security prior to its maturity (recording a gain or loss) in order to improve the risk structure, liquidity and yield of the portfolio in response to market conditions.
(3) If any security owned by the City is downgraded to a level below the requirements of this policy, making it ineligible for additional purchases, it shall be the City’s policy to review immediately the credit situation and make a determination as to whether to sell or retain such securities in the portfolio. If the highest credit rating of a security is downgraded one notch below the quality required in this investment policy, it will be considered acceptable to retain such downgraded security in the portfolio and its presence in the portfolio will be reported to the City Council and monitored continuously for further information. If the highest credit rating of a security is rated two grades below the required minimum rating, it will trigger an automatic sale of such downgraded security.
b) Market Risk: While the City recognizes that longer term portfolios achieve higher returns, longer term portfolios have higher volatility of total return. The City will limit market risk by limiting the concentrations, volume and duration of its longer term investments, as well as limiting them to funds which are not needed for current year cash flow purposes.
(1) Maturities selected shall provide for stability of income and liquidity, and shall not exceed 5 years from the date of purchase. Funds not required for purposes of meeting specific cash flow needs shall be invested in permitted securities so that securities will mature periodically across the maturity spectrum with a maximum of five years.
(2) The City may, on occasion, sell a security prior to its maturity (recording a gain or loss) in order to diminish the portfolio’s exposure to market risk or reinvest into a better opportunity providing more potential earning to the City’s portfolio.
726
10 4.0 REPORTING, REVIEW AND AUDITS
4.1 MONTHLY REPORTS
a) The Treasurer shall submit three monthly investment reports to the City Council, and they shall be submitted within 45 days following the end of the quarter. The monthly reports shall include a complete description of the portfolio, the type of investments, the issuers, maturity dates, par and dollar amounts invested on all securities, the current market values of each component of the portfolio, the source of the portfolio valuation, investments and moneys held by the City, and shall additionally include a description of any of the City’s funds, investments, or programs, that are under the management of contracted parties, including lending programs.
b) The report shall also include performance measures as recommended by the CFA Institute’s Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). These shall include a presentation of Total Return using accrual accounting, and a Time-weighted Rate of Return using a monthly valuation and one of the GIPS approved methods of calculation. The report shall also include a presentation of Yield to Maturity.
c) The report shall also include the performance of the benchmark described in Subsection 1.3 c) of this SIP as a basis of comparison for the City’s portfolio.
d) The report shall also include the following certifications:
(1) All investment actions executed since the last report have been made in full compliance with the SIP.
(2) The City will meet its expenditure obligations for the next six months is required by CGC Sections 53646(b)(2) and (3).
4.2 INTERNAL CONTROLS
The Treasurer is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the City are protected from loss, theft or misuse. The internal control structure shall be designed to provide reasonable assurance that these objectives are met. Internal controls shall be in writing and shall address the following points: separation of transaction authority from accounting and record keeping, safekeeping of assets and written confirmation of telephone transactions for investments and wire transfers.
4.3 ANNUAL AUDIT
The Treasurer shall insure that the City’s annual process of independent review by an external auditor will include an appropriate investment review to assure compliance with this policy and acceptable internal controls. The audit shall be presented to the City Council upon its completion.
4.4 SPECIAL AUDITS
The City Council may at any time order an audit of the investment portfolio and/or the Treasurer’s investment practices.
727
11 5.0 INVESTMENT POLICY ADOPTION
The SIP shall be reviewed annually by the City Council for consistency with the City’s overall investment objectives regarding preservation of principal, liquidity, return, relevance to current law as well as to current financial and economic trends. Any modifications necessary must be approved separately by the City Council. The SIP shall then be adopted in its entirety, as amended, within 120 days of the fiscal year end by resolution and vote of the City Council at a public meeting.
5.1 INVESTMENT POLICY CERTIFICATION
The 1999-2000 version of this investment policy was certified by the Municipal Treasurer’s Association of the United States and Canada, in June 2000. Recommended changes have been incorporated. In the event of any significant changes in legislation that will require significant changes to the SIP, the City will resubmit the new policy for re-certification.
728
12 GLOSSARY
AGENCIES: Federal agency securities
ASKED: The price at which securities are offered.
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES: Securities supported by pools of installment loans or leases or by pools of revolving lines of credit.
BANKERS’ ACCEPTANCE (BA): A draft or bill or exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill, as well as the issuer.
BENCHMARK: A segment of the securities market with characteristics similar to the subject portfolio. It is used to compare portfolio performance to the performance of the appropriate segment of the market. (e.g. 1-Year T-Bill rate)
BID: The price offered by a buyer of securities. (When you are selling securities, you ask for a bid.) See Offer.
BROKER: A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a commission.
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT (CD): A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a certificate. Large-denomination CD’s are typically negotiable.
COLLATERAL: Securities, evidence of deposit or other property, which a borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposits of public moneys.
COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS (CMO): Classes of bonds that redistribute the cash flows of mortgage securities (and whole loans) to create securities that have different levels of prepayment risk, as compared to the underlying mortgage securities.
COMMERCIAL PAPER: Short-term, negotiable unsecured promissory notes of corporations.
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT: The official annual report for the City of Orange. It includes five combined statements for each individual fund and account group prepared in conformity with GAAP. It also includes supporting schedules necessary to demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal and contractual provisions, extensive introductory material, and a detailed Statistical Section.
COUPON: (a) The annual rate of interest that a bond’s issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond’s face value. (b) A certificate attached to a bond evidencing interest due on a payment date.
729
13 DEALER: A dealer, as opposed to a broker, acts as a principal in all transactions, buying and selling for his own account.
DEBENTURE: A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer.
DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENT: There are two methods of delivery of securities: delivery versus payment and delivery versus receipt. Delivery versus payment is delivery of securities with an exchange of money for the securities. Delivery versus receipt is delivery of securities with an exchange of a signed receipt for the securities.
DISCOUNT: The difference between the cost price of a security and its maturity when quoted at lower than face value. A security selling below original offering price shortly after sale also is considered to be at a discount.
DISCOUNT SECURITIES: Non-interest bearing money market instruments that are issued a discount and redeemed at maturity for full face value; e.g., US Treasury Bills.
DIVERSIFICATION: Dividing investment funds among a variety of securities offering independent returns.
FEDERAL CREDIT AGENCIES: Agencies of the Federal government set up to supply credit to various classes of institutions and individuals; e.g., S&L’s, small business firms, students, farmers, farm cooperatives, and exporters.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (FDIC): A Federal agency that insures bank deposits, currently up to $250,000 per deposit.
FEDERAL FUNDS RATE: The rate of interest at which Federal funds are traded. This rate is currently pegged by the Federal Reserve through open-market operations.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS (FHLB): The institutions that regulate and lend to savings and loan associations. The Federal Home Loan banks play a role analogous to that played by the Federal Reserve Banks vis-à-vis member commercial banks.
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FNMA): FNMA, like GNMA, was chartered under the Federal National Mortgage Association Act in 1938. FNMA is a federal corporation working under the auspices of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). It is the largest single provider of residential mortgage funds in the United States.
Fannie Mae, as the corporation is called, is a private stockholder-owned corporation. The corporations’ purchases include a variety of adjustable mortgages and second loans. In addition to fixed-rate mortgages. FNMA’s securities are also highly liquid and are widely accepted. 730
14 FNMA assumes and guarantees that all security holders will receive timely payment of principal and interest.
FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE (FOMC): Consists of seven members of the Federal Reserve Board and five of the twelve Federal Reserve Bank Presidents. The President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is a permanent member, while the other Presidents serve on a rotating basis. The committee periodically meets to set Federal Reserve guidelines regarding purchases and sales of Government Securities in the open market as a means of influencing the volume of bank credit and money.
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM: The central bank of the United States created by Congress and consisting of a seven member Board of Governors in Washington, DC, 12 regional banks and about 5,700 commercial banks that are members of the system.
GLOBAL INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: Created by the CFA Institute, a global association for investment management professionals, and are governed by the GIPS Executive Committee. Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS) are a set of voluntary standards used by investment managers throughout the world to ensure the full disclosure and fair representation of their investment performance. The goal of the standards is to make it possible for investors to compare one firm’s performance against that of another firm.
GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (GNMA or Ginnie Mae):
Securities influencing the volume of bank credit guaranteed by GNMA and issued by mortgage banks, commercial banks, savings and loan associations, and other institutions. Security holder is protected by full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Ginnie Mae securities are backed by the FHA, VA or FMHM mortgages. The term “pass-throughs” is often used to describe Ginnie Maes.
LEVERAGE: Borrowing funds in order to invest in securities that have the potential to pay earnings at a rate higher than the cost of borrowing.
LIQUIDITY: A liquid asset is one that can be converted easily and rapidly into cash without a substantial loss of value. In the money market, a security is said to be liquid if the spread between bid and asked prices is narrow and reasonable size can be done at those quotes.
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF): A pooled investment vehicle for local agencies in California sponsored by the State of California and administered by the State Treasurer.
MARGIN: The difference between the market value of a security and the loan a broker makes using that security as collateral.
731
15 MARKET CYCLE: A market cycle is defined as a period of time which includes a minimum of two consecutive quarters of falling interest rates followed by a minimum of two consecutive quarters of rising interest rates.
MARKET VALUE: The price at which a security is traded and could presumably be purchased or sold.
MATURITY: The date upon which the principal or states value of an investment becomes due and payable.
MEDIUM TERM NOTES: Unsecured, investment-grade senior debt securities of major corporations which are sold in relatively small amounts on either a continuous or an intermittent basis. MTNs are highly flexible debt instruments that can be structured to respond to market opportunities or to investor preferences.
MONEY MARKET: The market in which short-term debt instruments (bills, commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances, etc.) are issued and traded.
MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUND: A mutual fund that invests exclusively in short-term securities. Examples of investments in money market funds are certificates of deposit and U.S.
Treasury securities. Money market funds attempt to keep their net asset values at $1 per share.
MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH SECURITIES: A securitized participation in the interest and principal cash flows from a specified pool of mortgages. Principal and interest payments made on the mortgages are passed through to the holder of the security
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES: Securities issued by state and local agencies to finance capital and operating expenses.
MUTUAL FUND: An entity which pools the funds of investors and invests those funds in a set of securities which is specifically defined in the fund’s prospectus. Mutual funds can be invested in various types of domestic and/or international stocks, bonds, and money market instruments, as set forth in the individual fund’s prospectus. For most large, institutional investors, the costs associated with investing in mutual funds are higher than the investor can obtain through an individually managed portfolio.
NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED STATISTICAL RATING ORGANIZATION (NRSRO):
A credit rating agency that the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States uses for regulatory purposes. Credit rating agencies provide assessments of an investment's risk. The issuers of investments, especially debt securities, pay credit rating agencies to provide them with ratings. The three most prominent NRSROs are Fitch, S&P, and Moody's.
732
16 NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT: A large denomination certificate of deposit which can be sold in the open market prior to maturity.
OFFER: The price asked by a seller of securities. (When you are buying securities, you ask for an offer.) See Asked and Bid.
PORTFOLIO: Collection of securities held by an investor.
PRIMARY DEALER: group of government securities dealers who submit daily reports of market activity and positions and monthly financial statements to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Primary dealers include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)-registered securities broker-dealers, banks, and a few unregulated firms.
PRUDENT INVESTOR STANDARD: Governing bodies of local agencies or persons authorized to make investment decisions on behalf of those local agencies investing public funds pursuant to CGC Sections 53600 et seq. are trustees and therefore fiduciaries subject to the prudent investor standard. When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling, and managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the agency. Within the limitations of the CGC Sections 53600 et seq. and considering individual investments as part to an overall strategy, a trustee is authorized to acquire investments as authorized by law.
QUALIFIED PUBLIC DEPOSITORIES: A financial institution which does not claim exemption from the payment of any sale or compensating use or ad valorem taxes under the laws of this state, which has aggregated for the benefit of the commission eligible collateral having a value of not less than its maximum liability and which has been approved by the Public Deposit Protection Commission to hold public deposits.
SAFEKEEPING: A service to customers rendered by banks for a fee whereby securities and valuables of all types and descriptions are held in the bank’s vaults for protection.
SECONDARY MARKET: A market made for the purchase and sale of outstanding issues following the initial distribution.
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION: Agency created by Congress to protect investors in securities transactions by administering securities legislation.
SUPRANATIONAL: A Supranational is a multi-national organization whereby member states transcend national boundaries or interests to share in the decision making to promote economic development in the member countries.
733
17 TIME CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT: A non-negotiable certificate of deposit which cannot be sold prior to maturity.
TOTAL RATE OF RETURN: Represents growth (or decline) in the value of a portfolio, including both capital appreciation and income, as a proportion of the starting market value.
TIME-WEIGHTED RATE OF RETURN: A modified measurement of Total rate of Return which eliminates the effect of the timing of funds flows to and/or from a security or portfolio.
TREASURY BILLS: A non-interest bearing discount security issued by the U.S. Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in three months, six months, or one year.
TREASURY BOND: Long-term U.S. Treasury securities having initial maturities of more than 10 years.
TREASURY NOTES: A non-interest bearing discount security issued by the US Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in one, two, three, five or ten years.
YIELD: The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed as a percentage.
YIELD TO MATURITY is the calculated rate of return based upon the present value of the cash flow from each interest payment, plus the present value of the cash flow from the investment’s redemption value at maturity vs. the purchase price.
734
Dated: June 8April
12, 2021
CITY OF ORANGE
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
Fiscal Year 20212022-2223
1.0 INVESTMENT POLICY OVERVIEW
1.1 POLICY
It is the policy of the City of Orange (“City”) to invest public funds in a manner which will provide foremost for the safety of principal while meeting the short- and long-term cash flow demands of the City and conforming to all statutes governing the investment of City funds.
Annually, in accordance with California Government Code (“CGC”) Section 53646, the Treasurer will render to the City Council a Statement of Investment Policy for consideration and approval at a public meeting. Any investment currently held at that time that does not meet the guidelines of this policy, as changed from time to time by the City Council, shall be exempt from the requirements of this policy. However, at the investment’s maturity or liquidation, such funds shall be reinvested only as provided by this policy.
1.2 PURPOSE
This Statement of Investment Policy (“SIP”) is set forth by the City for the following purposes:
a) To establish a clear understanding for the City Council, Investment Committees, City management, responsible employees, citizens and third parties, of the objectives, policies and guidelines for the investment of the City’s idle and surplus funds.
b) To offer guidance to investment staff, brokers and any external investment advisors on the investment of City funds.
1.3 INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES
Within the overriding requirement of compliance with all Federal, State and local laws governing the investment of moneys under the control of the Treasurer, and as specified in the CGC Section 53600.5, when investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling and managing public funds, the primary objectives, in priority order, of the investment activities shall be:
735
2 a) Safety: Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program.
Investments of the City shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio.
b) Liquidity: The investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet all operating requirements which might be reasonably anticipated.
c) Return on Investments: The investment portfolio shall be designed and managed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment objectives, authorized investments and the cash flow needs of the City. The Treasurer’s monthly reports shall include benchmark reporting to define “a market rate of return”; which shall be one of the indices published in a financial journal of wide circulation that are most comparable to the Treasurer’s portfolio. The benchmark shall be used solely as a reference tool. The Treasurer shall not add additional risk to the portfolio in order to attain or exceed the benchmark.
1.4 PRUDENCE
Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs; not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. The standard of prudence to be used by investment officials shall be the “prudent investor” standard (CGC Section 53600.3) and shall be applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio. The Treasurer and other investment employees, acting within the intent and scope of the SIP and other written procedures, and exercising due diligence, shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security’s credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in the immediately following Treasurer’s Report and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments. When a deviation poses a significant risk to the City’s financial position, the City Council shall be notified immediately.
1.5 ETHICS
Elected officials, City officers and employees and any other individuals involved in the investment operations are prohibited from personal business activity that could conflict with the proper execution of the investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions, or which could give the appearance thereof.
Furthermore, these same individuals are prohibited from undertaking personal investment transactions with any individual with whom business is conducted on behalf of the City.
2.0 OPERATIONS AND PROCEDURES
2.1 SCOPE
a) This SIP applies to all financial assets of the City. These funds are accounted for in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and include: General Commented [JS1]: Should be removed per GFOA recommendation. Please see GFOA notification:
https://www.gfoa.org/statement-of-name-change
736
3 Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Funds, Capital Project Funds, Enterprise Funds, and Internal Service Funds.
a)b) This SIP specifically exempts and does not apply to the following financial assets and investment activities of the City:
(1) The City’s Deferred Compensation Plan is excluded because it is managed by a third party administrator and invested by individual plan participants.
(2) Proceeds of City or other debt issues in possession of a trustee or fiscal agent are not considered to be part of the financial assets covered by this policy. These bond proceeds shall be invested in accordance with the requirements and restrictions outlined in the bond documents.
2.2 DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
a) The City Council’s authority to manage the investment program is derived from CGC Sections 53600 et seq.
b) In accordance with the City of Orange Municipal Code Chapter 2.26, management responsibility for the investment program is hereby delegated to the Treasurer, who shall establish written procedures for the operation of the investment program consistent with this SIP. Under the provision of CGC Section 53600.3, the Treasurer is a trustee and a fiduciary subject to the prudent investor standard.
c) The Treasurer may delegate all, or a portion of, his/her investment authority to a Deputy City Treasurer. Prior to the delegation of the investment authority to a Deputy City Treasurer, the City Treasurer shall notify the City Council and request confirmation of the delegation. Delegation of investment authority will not remove or abridge the Treasurer’s investment responsibility.
d) The City Council may engage the services of one or more external investment managers to assist in the management of the City’s investment portfolio in a manner consistent with the City’s objectives and in accordance with this SIP. Such external managers may provide advice and effectuate trades upon specific authorization for each transaction. Such managers must be registered under the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 and must have not less than five years’ experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized by the CGC Section 53601, and with assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). The Treasurer shall review Form ADV of any investment advisor prior to engagement by the City Council. This Section does not preclude the Treasurer from retaining portfolio consultants within existing authority.
2.3 INVESTMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
737
4 a) Chapter 2.50 of the Orange Municipal Code establishes an Investment Oversight Committee (IOC). The terms and provisions of said Chapter 2.50 are incorporated into this SIP by reference as though fully set forth herein. The IOC consists of the Treasurer, the City Manager or designee, and the Director of Finance. The Treasurer is required to act as Chair of the IOC, with the City Manager as Vice Chair. The IOC is required to act by majority vote.
b) The IOC shall, at least annually and more often if directed by the City Council or agreed by a majority of the IOC, review the City Council’s adopted SIP and report to the City Council its recommendations for any changes, additions or deletions to the SIP.
c) The IOC shall monitor the implementation of the City Council’s adopted SIP and annually submit a compliance report to the City Council.
d) The IOC shall review reports to the City Council from the Investment Advisory Committee and prepare responses as required.
e) The IOC shall meet and report quarterly to the City Council summarizing the IOC meetings and the recommendations of the Investment Advisory Committee. Such report shall contain an unedited copy of the Investment Advisory Committee’s recommendations.
2.4 AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND DEALERS
a) Institutions eligible to transact investment business with the City shall include only the following:
(1) Primary government dealers as designated by the Federal Reserve Bank and non-primary government dealers.;
(2) Nationally or state-chartered banks;
(3) The Federal Reserve Bank; and
(4) Direct issuers of securities eligible for purchase by the City; (5) .Institutions licensed by the state as a broker-dealer; and (6) Institutions that are members of a federally regulated securities exchange.
b) Selection of financial institutions and broker/dealers authorized to engage in transactions with the City shall be at the sole discretion of the City Treasurer. The Treasurer will maintain a list of financial institutions authorized to provide investment services to the City.
c) The City Treasurer shall obtain information from qualified financial institutions to determine if the institution makes markets in securities appropriate for the City’s needs, can assign qualified sales representatives and can provide written agreements to abide by the conditions set forth in the City of Orange SIP.
Commented [CM2]: CAM recommends updating list of
authorized institutions to transact business with
738
5 Investment accounts with all financial institutions shall be standard non- discretionary accounts and may not be margin accounts.
d) All financial institutions which desire to become qualified bidders for investment transactions must supply the Treasurer with the following:
(1) Audited financial statements for the institution’s three most recent fiscal years;
(1)(2) At least three references from California local agencies whose portfolio size, investment objectives and risk preferences are similar to the City’s;
(3) A statement certifying that the institution has reviewed the CGC Sections 53600 et seq. and the City’s SIP, and that all securities offered to the City shall comply fully and in every instance with all provisions of the Code and with this SIP; and,
(2)(4) Completed Broker/Dealer Questionnaire.
e) The Treasurer shall conduct an annual review of the financial condition of qualified institutions. In addition, a current financial statement is required to be on file for each qualified institution.
f) Public deposits shall be made only in qualified public depositories within the State of California as established by State law. Deposits shall be insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or, to the extent the amount exceeds the insured maximum, shall be collateralized with securities in accordance with State law.
f)g) Selection of broker/dealers used by an external investment adviser retained by the City will be at the sole discretion of the adviser. Where possible, transactions with broker/dealers shall be selected on a competitive basis and their bid or offering prices shall be recorded. If there is no other readily available competitive offering, best efforts will be made to document quotations for comparable or alternative securities. When purchasing original issue instrumentality securities, no competitive offerings will be required as all dealers in the selling group offer those securities at the same original issue price.
2.5 COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS
CGC Sections 53652 and 53667 require depositories to post certain types and levels of collateral for public funds on deposit above the FDIC insurance amounts. The collateral requirements apply to bank deposits, both active (checking and savings accounts) and inactive (non-negotiable time certificates of deposit).
2.6 SAFEKEEPING AND DELIVERY
Commented [CM3]: CAM recommends updating language
to include competitive bid process.
739
6 a) To protect against fraud, embezzlement, or losses caused by collapse of individual securities dealers, all securities owned by the City shall be held in safekeeping by the City’s custodial bank, a third party bank trust department, acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement, and shall be evidenced by safekeeping receipts.
b) All security transactions entered into by the City shall be conducted on a standard delivery-versus-payment (DVP) basis, which ensures that securities are deposited with the third party custodian prior to the release of funds. All securities purchased or acquired shall be delivered to the City by book entry, physical delivery or by third party custodial agreement as required by CGC Section 53601. Investments in the State Pool or money market mutual funds are undeliverable, and are not subject to delivery or third party safekeeping requirements.
c) On a daily basis, investment trades shall be verified against the bank transactions and broker confirmation tickets to ensure accuracy. On a monthly basis, the custodial asset statement is reconciled with the month end portfolio holdings. On an annual basis, the external auditor confirms investment holdings.
3.0 PERMITTED INVESTMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT
3.1 INVESTMENTS AUTHORIZED
The City, as empowered by CGC Sections 53601 et seq. and 16429.1, hereby authorizes the City Treasurer to select investments from among the following:
(1) United States Treasury notes, bonds, bills or certificates of indebtedness, or those for which the faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest. (Limits: Maximum maturity at purchase 5 years; no other limits.)
(2) Obligations issued by banks for cooperatives, federal land banks, federal intermediate credit banks, the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Federal National Mortgage Association, or other instruments of, or issued by, a federal agency or a United States government-sponsored enterprise. In every case, any issue purchased must be fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the United States, or the issuing federal agency. (Limits: Maximum maturity at purchase 5 years; maximum concentration 75% of portfolio at time of purchase with no more than 305% of total portfolio in any single agency, the maximum percent of agency callable securities in the portfolio will be 20%, and excluding completely Government National Mortgage Association bonds; i.e., GNMA’s.)
Commented [CM4]: CAM recommends including risk
management language limiting the number of callable agency securities to 20% and adjust the amount of the purchase of any single issuer to be 30%, in line with Best Practices 740
7 (3) Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies that are Money Market Mutual Funds, registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940 investing in the securities and obligations authorized by CGC Sections 53601(b) and (e) only (i.e., U.S.
Government issues only). Such Funds must either carry the highest rating of at least two of the three largest national rating agencies, or such funds must have retained an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five year’s experience managing money market mutual funds with assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). (Limits: maximum 90 days Weighted Average Maturity; maximum concentration $15 million, or 20%, of portfolio, whichever is less.)
(4) State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is permitted, with the knowledge that the fund may invest in some vehicles allowed by statute but not otherwise authorized by the City Council in this SIP. The Treasurer shall obtain from the State Treasurer, no less than quarterly, reports providing sufficient detail to adequately judge the risk inherent in the LAIF portfolio, and shall inform the City Council immediately of any risks noted that may warrant reconsideration of this investment vehicle. (Limits: $75 million per account as of 1/1/2020.)
(5) Investment in new Government sponsored pools will be subject to due diligence. A thorough investigation of the pool is required prior to investing, and on a continual basis.
(6) Funds held under the terms of a Trust Indenture or other contract or debt issuance agreement may be invested according to the provisions of those indentures or agreements.
(7) Certificates of Deposit approved by the California AB 2011 are permitted. (Limits:
The bill allows investment up to January 1, 2021; a maximum concentration 30% of total portfolio.)
(8) Commercial Paper of prime quality in the having the highest credit category ranking or the highest letter and number rating provided by a nationally recognized statistical ratings organizationnational rating agency (NRSRO) issued by a domestic corporation having assets in excess of $500,000,000 and rated in the category of having an “A” or better by a NRSRO rating on its debt other than commercial paper as provided by a national rating agency. (Limits: Maximum maturity of 270 days or less; maximum concentration 2025% of portfolio may be invested in Commercial Paper. Under a provision sunsetting on January 1, 2026, no more than 40% of the portfolio may be invested in Commercial Paper if the Agency’s Commented [JS5]: CAM recommends updating NRSRO
language including rating category
741
8 investment assets under management are greater than $100,000,000; and no more than 5% of the book value of the portfolio funds to a single issuer at time of purchase.)
(9) Medium-term notes issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States. (Limits: Maximum maturity at purchase 5 years; must be rated in the category of “A” or better by a NRSRO nationally recognized rating agency; maximum concentration 2030% of portfolio and no more than 5% of the book value of the portfolio funds to a single issuer at time of purchase.)
(10) Municipal bonds include obligations issued by the State of California and any local agency within the state of California, and registered bonds of any of the other 49 states in addition to California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue producing property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or local agency or by a department, board, agency, or authority of a state or local agency. (Limits: Maximum maturity at purchase 5 years; must be rated in the category of “A” or better by a NRSRO nationally recognized rating agency; maximum concentration 20% of portfolio and no more than 5% of the book value of the portfolio funds to a single issuer at time of purchase.) (11) Asset-Backed, Mortgage-Backed, Mortgage Pass-Through Securities, and Collateralized Mortgage Obligations limited to mortgage-backed pass-through securities issued by a US government agency or consumer receivable pass-through certificates or bonds. (Limits. Maximum maturity at purchase of 5 years ; the securities are rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or higher by a NRSRO, The aggregate investment in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities described in this section shall not exceed 20% of the portfolio; no more than 5% held in any one issuer that is not a US government agency.) (12) Supranational securities, senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International Finance Corporation, or Inter-American Development Bank which are eligible for purchase in the United States. (Limits: Maximum remaining maturity of five years or less; Investments under this subdivision shall be rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or higher by a NRSRO ; maximum concentration of 30% of the portfolio with no more than 10% invested in any one issuer.)
3.2 PROHIBITED INVESTMENT VEHICLES AND PRACTICES
The City Treasurer is prohibited from the following:
a) Borrowing for investment purposes (“Leverage”) is prohibited.
Commented [CM6]: CAM recommends increasing the limit
for commercial paper to be in line with Best Practices and CA government code, as well as up to date with the passing of SB 998
Commented [JS7]: CAM recommends updating NRSRO
language including rating category
Commented [CM8]: CAM recommends increasing the
maximum concentration of medium term notes to be 30%, in line with Best Practices and CA government code
Commented [JS9]: CAM recommends updating NRSRO
language including rating category
Commented [CM10]: CAM recommends including Pass-
Through Securities under permitted investments
Commented [CM11]: CAM recommends including
Supranationals under permitted investments
742
9 b) Buying or selling securities “on Margin” is prohibited.
c) Investing in any instrument, which is commonly known as a “derivative” instrument (options, futures, swaps, caps, floors, collars, U.S. Treasury zero coupon bonds, U.S. Treasury strips, interest only bonds, interest-only strips derived from mortgage pools), or any investment that may result in a zero interest accrual, even if held to maturity, is prohibited..
d) Under the provisions of CGC Sections 53601.6 and 53631.5, the City shall not invest any funds covered by this SIP in instruments known as Structured Notes (e.g. inverse floaters, leverage floaters, structured CD’s, range notes, equity-linked securities). Any such investments are prohibited.
e) Trading securities for the sole purpose of speculating on the future direction of interest rates is prohibited.
f) State law notwithstanding, any investments not specifically described herein under Subsections 3.1 a) through 3.1 c) are prohibited.
3.3 MITIGATING RISK IN THE PORTFOLIO
a) Credit Risk:
(1) The City will diversify its investments in accordance with the limits set forth in Subsection 3.1 of this SIP to diminish the credit risk resulting from concentrations.
(2) The City, on occasion, may sell a security prior to its maturity (recording a gain or loss) in order to improve the risk structure, liquidity and yield of the portfolio in response to market conditions.
(2)(3) If any securitiesity owned by the City is downgraded to a level below the requirements of this policy, making it ineligible for additional purchases, it that are rated by either Moody’s, S&P or Fitch by a major national rating agency are downgraded by either Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, it shall be the City’s policy to review immediately the credit situation and make a determination as to whether to sell or retain such securities in the portfolio.
If the highest credit rating of a security is downgraded one notch below the quality required in this investment policy, it will be considered acceptable to retain such downgraded security in the portfolio and its presence in the portfolio will be reported to the City Council and be monitored on a continuously for further information basis. If the highest credit rating of a security is rated two grades below the required minimum rating, it will trigger an automatic sale of such downgraded security.
Commented [JS12]: CAM recommends updating
downgrade language
743
10 b) Market Risk: While the City recognizes that longer term portfolios achieve higher returns, longer term portfolios have higher volatility of total return. The City will limit market risk by limiting the concentrations, volume and duration of its longer term investments, as well as limiting them to funds which are not needed for current year cash flow purposes.
(1) Maturities selected shall provide for stability of income and liquidity, and shall not exceed 5 years from the date of purchase. . The City shall structure its investment portfolio as a maturity ladder. Funds not required for purposes of meeting specific cash flow needs shall be invested in permitted securities so that securities will mature periodically across the maturity spectrum with selected percentages of the portfolio mature each year to a maximum of five years.
(2) Portfolio maturities shall be managed to avoid undue concentration at time of purchase in any specific maturity sector with at least 15% of the portfolio must be invested from one to 365 in this maturity sector, no more than 50% of the portfolio be invested from 366 days to 730 days, no more than 35% of the portfolio be invested from 731 days to 1095 days, no more than 30% of the portfolio be invested from 1096 days to 1460 days, and no more than 30% of the portfolio be invested from 1461 days to 1825 days.
(32) The City may, on occasion, sell a security prior to its maturity (recording a gain or loss) in order to diminish the portfolio’s exposure to market risk or reinvest into a better opportunity providing more potential earning to the City’s portfolio.
4.0 REPORTING, REVIEW AND AUDITS
4.1 MONTHLY REPORTS
a) The Treasurer shall submit three monthly investment reports to the City Council, and they shall be submitted within 45 days following the end of the quarter. The monthly reports shall include a complete description of the portfolio, the type of investments, the issuers, maturity dates, par and dollar amounts invested on all securities, the current market values of each component of the portfolio, the source of the portfolio valuation, investments and moneys held by the City, and shall additionally include a description of any of the City’s funds, investments, or programs, that are under the management of contracted parties, including lending programs.
b) The report shall also include performance measures as recommended by the CFA Institute’s Global Investment Performance Standards Association for Investment Management and Research (GIPSAIMR). These shall include a presentation of Total Return using accrual accounting, and a Time-weighted Rate of Return using Commented [JS13]: CAM recommends updating this
section to reduce emphasis on laddering.
Commented [CM14]: CAM recommends removing term
structure limitations
Commented [JS15]: CAM recommends updating language
to include comment about improving opportunities
Commented [JS16]: CAM recommends updating language
as AIMR is no longer valid.
744
11 a monthly valuation and one of the GIPSAIMR approved methods of calculation.
The report shall also include a presentation of Yield to Maturity.
c) The report shall also include the performance of the benchmark described in Subsection 1.3 c) of this SIP as a basis of comparison for the City’s portfolio.
d) The report shall also include the following certifications:
(1) All investment actions executed since the last report have been made in full compliance with the SIP.
(2) The City will meet its expenditure obligations for the next six months is required by CGC Sections 53646(b)(2) and (3).
4.2 INTERNAL CONTROLS
The Treasurer is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the City are protected from loss, theft or misuse. The internal control structure shall be designed to provide reasonable assurance that these objectives are met. Internal controls shall be in writing and shall address the following points: : separation of transaction authority from accounting and record keeping, safekeeping of assets and written confirmation of telephone transactions for investments and wire transfers.
4.3 ANNUAL AUDIT
The Treasurer shall insure that the City’s annual process of independent review by an external auditor will include an appropriate investment review to assure compliance with this policy and acceptable internal controls. The audit shall be presented to the City Council upon its completion.
4.4 SPECIAL AUDITS
The City Council may at any time order an audit of the investment portfolio and/or the Treasurer’s investment practices.
5.0 INVESTMENT POLICY ADOPTION
The SIP shall be reviewed annually by the City Council for consistency with the City’s overall investment objectives regarding preservation of principal, liquidity, return, relevance to current law as well as to current financial and economic trends. Any modifications necessary must be approved separately by the City Council. The SIP shall then be adopted in its entirety, as amended, within 120 days of the fiscal year end by resolution and vote of the City Council at a public meeting.
5.1 INVESTMENT POLICY CERTIFICATION
The 1999-2000 version of this investment policy was certified by the Municipal Treasurer’s Association of the United States and Canada, in June 2000. Recommended changes have been incorporated. In the event of any significant changes in legislation 745
12 that will require significant changes to the SIP, the City will resubmit the new policy for re-certification.
746
13 GLOSSARY
AGENCIES: Federal agency securities
ASKED: The price at which securities are offered.
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES: Securities supported by pools of installment loans or leases or by pools of revolving lines of credit.
BANKERS’ ACCEPTANCE (BA): A draft or bill or exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill, as well as the issuer.
BENCHMARK: A segment of the securities market with characteristics similar to the subject portfolio. It is used to compare portfolio performance to the performance of the appropriate segment of the market. (e.g. 1-Year T-Bill rate)
BID: The price offered by a buyer of securities. (When you are selling securities, you ask for a bid.) See Offer.
BROKER: A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a commission.
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT (CD): A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a certificate. Large-denomination CD’s are typically negotiable.
COLLATERAL: Securities, evidence of deposit or other property, which a borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposits of public moneys.
COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS (CMO): Classes of bonds that redistribute the cash flows of mortgage securities (and whole loans) to create securities that have different levels of prepayment risk, as compared to the underlying mortgage securities.
COMMERCIAL PAPER: Short-term, negotiable unsecured promissory notes of corporations.
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR): The official annual report for the City of Orange. It includes five combined statements for each individual fund and account group prepared in conformity with GAAP. It also includes supporting schedules necessary to demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal and contractual provisions, extensive introductory material, and a detailed Statistical Section.
COUPON: (a) The annual rate of interest that a bond’s issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond’s face value. (b) A certificate attached to a bond evidencing interest due on a payment date.
Commented [CM17]: CAM recommends updating terms in
the Glossary
Commented [JS18]: Should be removed per GFOA
recommendation.
747
14 DEALER: A dealer, as opposed to a broker, acts as a principal in all transactions, buying and selling for his own account.
DEBENTURE: A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer.
DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENT: There are two methods of delivery of securities: delivery versus payment and delivery versus receipt. Delivery versus payment is delivery of securities with an exchange of money for the securities. Delivery versus receipt is delivery of securities with an exchange of a signed receipt for the securities.
DISCOUNT: The difference between the cost price of a security and its maturity when quoted at lower than face value. A security selling below original offering price shortly after sale also is considered to be at a discount.
DISCOUNT SECURITIES: Non-interest bearing money market instruments that are issued a discount and redeemed at maturity for full face value; e.g., US Treasury Bills.
DIVERSIFICATION: Dividing investment funds among a variety of securities offering independent returns.
FEDERAL CREDIT AGENCIES: Agencies of the Federal government set up to supply credit to various classes of institutions and individuals; e.g., S&L’s, small business firms, students, farmers, farm cooperatives, and exporters.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (FDIC): A Federal agency that insures bank deposits, currently up to $250,000 per deposit.
FEDERAL FUNDS RATE: The rate of interest at which Federal funds are traded. This rate is currently pegged by the Federal Reserve through open-market operations.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS (FHLB): The institutions that regulate and lend to savings and loan associations. The Federal Home Loan banks play a role analogous to that played by the Federal Reserve Banks vis-à-vis member commercial banks.
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FNMA): FNMA, like GNMA, was chartered under the Federal National Mortgage Association Act in 1938. FNMA is a federal corporation working under the auspices of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). It is the largest single provider of residential mortgage funds in the United States.
Fannie Mae, as the corporation is called, is a private stockholder-owned corporation. The corporations’ purchases include a variety of adjustable mortgages and second loans. In addition to fixed-rate mortgages. FNMA’s securities are also highly liquid and are widely accepted. 748
15 FNMA assumes and guarantees that all security holders will receive timely payment of principal and interest.
FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE (FOMC): Consists of seven members of the Federal Reserve Board and five of the twelve Federal Reserve Bank Presidents. The President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is a permanent member, while the other Presidents serve on a rotating basis. The committee periodically meets to set Federal Reserve guidelines regarding purchases and sales of Government Securities in the open market as a means of influencing the volume of bank credit and money.
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM: The central bank of the United States created by Congress and consisting of a seven member Board of Governors in Washington, DC, 12 regional banks and about 5,700 commercial banks that are members of the system.
GLOBAL INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: Created by the CFA Institute, a global association for investment management professionals, and are governed by the GIPS Executive Committee. Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS) are a set of voluntary standards used by investment managers throughout the world to ensure the full disclosure and fair representation of their investment performance. The goal of the standards is to make it possible for investors to compare one firm’s performance against that of another firm.
GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (GNMA or Ginnie Mae):
Securities influencing the volume of bank credit guaranteed by GNMA and issued by mortgage banks, commercial banks, savings and loan associations, and other institutions. Security holder is protected by full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Ginnie Mae securities are backed by the FHA, VA or FMHM mortgages. The term “pass-throughs” is often used to describe Ginnie Maes.
LEVERAGE: Borrowing funds in order to invest in securities that have the potential to pay earnings at a rate higher than the cost of borrowing.
LIQUIDITY: A liquid asset is one that can be converted easily and rapidly into cash without a substantial loss of value. In the money market, a security is said to be liquid if the spread between bid and asked prices is narrow and reasonable size can be done at those quotes.
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF): A pooled investment vehicle for local agencies in California sponsored by the State of California and administered by the State Treasurer.
MARGIN: The difference between the market value of a security and the loan a broker makes using that security as collateral.
749
16 MARKET CYCLE: A market cycle is defined as a period of time which includes a minimum of two consecutive quarters of falling interest rates followed by a minimum of two consecutive quarters of rising interest rates.
MARKET VALUE: The price at which a security is traded and could presumably be purchased or sold.
MATURITY: The date upon which the principal or states value of an investment becomes due and payable.
MEDIUM TERM NOTES: Unsecured, investment-grade senior debt securities of major corporations which are sold in relatively small amounts on either a continuous or an intermittent basis. MTNs are highly flexible debt instruments that can be structured to respond to market opportunities or to investor preferences.
MONEY MARKET: The market in which short-term debt instruments (bills, commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances, etc.) are issued and traded.
MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUND: A mutual fund that invests exclusively in short-term securities. Examples of investments in money market funds are certificates of deposit and U.S.
Treasury securities. Money market funds attempt to keep their net asset values at $1 per share.
MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH SECURITIES: A securitized participation in the interest and principal cash flows from a specified pool of mortgages. Principal and interest payments made on the mortgages are passed through to the holder of the security
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES: Securities issued by state and local agencies to finance capital and operating expenses.
MUTUAL FUND: An entity which pools the funds of investors and invests those funds in a set of securities which is specifically defined in the fund’s prospectus. Mutual funds can be invested in various types of domestic and/or international stocks, bonds, and money market instruments, as set forth in the individual fund’s prospectus. For most large, institutional investors, the costs associated with investing in mutual funds are higher than the investor can obtain through an individually managed portfolio.
NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED STATISTICAL RATING ORGANIZATION (NRSRO):
A credit rating agency that the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States uses for regulatory purposes. Credit rating agencies provide assessments of an investment's risk. The issuers of investments, especially debt securities, pay credit rating agencies to provide them with ratings. The three most prominent NRSROs are Fitch, S&P, and Moody's.
750
17 NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT: A large denomination certificate of deposit which can be sold in the open market prior to maturity.
OFFER: The price asked by a seller of securities. (When you are buying securities, you ask for an offer.) See Asked and Bid.
PORTFOLIO: Collection of securities held by an investor.
PRIMARY DEALER: group of government securities dealers who submit daily reports of market activity and positions and monthly financial statements to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Primary dealers include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)-registered securities broker-dealers, banks, and a few unregulated firms.
PRUDENT INVESTOR STANDARD: Governing bodies of local agencies or persons authorized to make investment decisions on behalf of those local agencies investing public funds pursuant to CGC Sections 53600 et seq. are trustees and therefore fiduciaries subject to the prudent investor standard. When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling, and managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the agency. Within the limitations of the CGC Sections 53600 et seq. and considering individual investments as part to an overall strategy, a trustee is authorized to acquire investments as authorized by law.
QUALIFIED PUBLIC DEPOSITORIES: A financial institution which does not claim exemption from the payment of any sale or compensating use or ad valorem taxes under the laws of this state, which has aggregated for the benefit of the commission eligible collateral having a value of not less than its maximum liability and which has been approved by the Public Deposit Protection Commission to hold public deposits.
SAFEKEEPING: A service to customers rendered by banks for a fee whereby securities and valuables of all types and descriptions are held in the bank’s vaults for protection.
SECONDARY MARKET: A market made for the purchase and sale of outstanding issues following the initial distribution.
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION: Agency created by Congress to protect investors in securities transactions by administering securities legislation.
SUPRANATIONAL: A Supranational is a multi-national organization whereby member states transcend national boundaries or interests to share in the decision making to promote economic development in the member countries.
751
18 TIME CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT: A non-negotiable certificate of deposit which cannot be sold prior to maturity.
TOTAL RATE OF RETURN: Represents growth (or decline) in the value of a portfolio, including both capital appreciation and income, as a proportion of the starting market value.
TIME-WEIGHTED RATE OF RETURN: A modified measurement of Total rate of Return which eliminates the effect of the timing of funds flows to and/or from a security or portfolio.
TREASURY BILLS: A non-interest bearing discount security issued by the U.S. Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in three months, six months, or one year.
TREASURY BOND: Long-term U.S. Treasury securities having initial maturities of more than 10 years.
TREASURY NOTES: A non-interest bearing discount security issued by the US Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in one, two, three, five or ten years.
YIELD: The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed as a percentage.
YIELD TO MATURITY is the calculated rate of return based upon the present value of the cash flow from each interest payment, plus the present value of the cash flow from the investment’s redemption value at maturity vs. the purchase price.
752
19 753
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.39. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0202
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Rob Houston, City Manager
FROM: Christopher Cash, Public Works Director
1. SUBJECT
Modifications to the City Traffic Commission meeting schedule. Resolution No. 11388.
2. SUMMARY
As currently prescribed by City Council resolution, regular meetings of the City Traffic Commission (CTC) are scheduled to occur monthly unless cancelled. Based on the volume of consideration items actually presented to the City Traffic Commission, a reduced, bi-monthly schedule would provide for greater efficiency.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Resolution No. 11388. A resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange rescinding Resolution No. 9640 and setting the date and time of meetings of the Traffic Commission.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Provide for a safe community
a: Provide staffing and resources to deliver services that ensure public safety
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
City Council Resolution No. 9640 sets the City Traffic Commission (CTC) schedule as follows:
· Traffic Commission shall meet in regular session on the second Wednesday of every month and convene at the hour of 5:30 PM;
· If any regular meeting date should fall on a holiday, the same day in the following week shall be designated as the meeting day; and
· Special meetings may be called by the Chairman or a majority of the Commission.
Notwithstanding, recent trends in the number of action items brought forward to the CTC each year indicate that a monthly meeting schedule is neither optimal nor necessary. In fact, since 2016, the CTC has convened, on average, five to six times each year to consider two to three agenda items per meeting. This results in slightly over half of all regularly scheduled meetings being randomly cancelled, often due to a lack of agenda items. These cancellations lead to inconsistency and City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
754
Item #: 3.39. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0202
cancelled, often due to a lack of agenda items. These cancellations lead to inconsistency and uncertainty in the effective CTC schedule which, if left unaddressed, could be a potential disservice to the community.
To address the above, staff proposes the following changes to the CTC schedule:
· Reduce the meeting frequency, from monthly to bi-monthly, with regular meetings to occur on the second Wednesday of every even-numbered month (February, April, June, August, October, and December);
· Retain the 5:30 p.m. start time and ability to call special meetings; · Establish Thursday of the following week as the designated meeting day in the event a regular meeting date falls on a holiday (this change, from Wednesday to Thursday, is to avoid potential scheduling conflicts with other City commissions and committees.) Staff believes that the proposed schedule appropriately reduces meeting frequency while allowing sufficient flexibility to conduct any and all necessary business. The changes are expected to achieve greater consistency and efficiency in the CTC schedule. More importantly, staff remains committed to calling special meetings whenever a public safety matter requires the CTC to take action prior to its next regular meeting.
At its March 9, 2022, meeting, the CTC voted 4-0 to concur with the proposed changes and authorize staff to present a resolution for City Council approval. The changes, if approved, would be effective immediately.
7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. 11388
· CTC Staff Report
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
755
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.39. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0202
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Rob Houston, City Manager
FROM: Christopher Cash, Public Works Director
1. SUBJECT
Modifications to the City Traffic Commission meeting schedule. Resolution No. 11388.
2. SUMMARY
As currently prescribed by City Council resolution, regular meetings of the City Traffic Commission (CTC) are scheduled to occur monthly unless cancelled. Based on the volume of consideration items actually presented to the City Traffic Commission, a reduced, bi-monthly schedule would provide for greater efficiency.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Resolution No. 11388. A resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange rescinding Resolution No. 9640 and setting the date and time of meetings of the Traffic Commission.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Provide for a safe community
a: Provide staffing and resources to deliver services that ensure public safety
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
City Council Resolution No. 9640 sets the City Traffic Commission (CTC) schedule as follows:
· Traffic Commission shall meet in regular session on the second Wednesday of every month and convene at the hour of 5:30 PM;
· If any regular meeting date should fall on a holiday, the same day in the following week shall be designated as the meeting day; and
· Special meetings may be called by the Chairman or a majority of the Commission.
Notwithstanding, recent trends in the number of action items brought forward to the CTC each year indicate that a monthly meeting schedule is neither optimal nor necessary. In fact, since 2016, the CTC has convened, on average, five to six times each year to consider two to three agenda items per meeting. This results in slightly over half of all regularly scheduled meetings being randomly cancelled, often due to a lack of agenda items. These cancellations lead to inconsistency and City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
756
Item #: 3.39. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0202
cancelled, often due to a lack of agenda items. These cancellations lead to inconsistency and uncertainty in the effective CTC schedule which, if left unaddressed, could be a potential disservice to the community.
To address the above, staff proposes the following changes to the CTC schedule:
· Reduce the meeting frequency, from monthly to bi-monthly, with regular meetings to occur on the second Wednesday of every even-numbered month (February, April, June, August, October, and December);
· Retain the 5:30 p.m. start time and ability to call special meetings; · Establish Thursday of the following week as the designated meeting day in the event a regular meeting date falls on a holiday (this change, from Wednesday to Thursday, is to avoid potential scheduling conflicts with other City commissions and committees.) Staff believes that the proposed schedule appropriately reduces meeting frequency while allowing sufficient flexibility to conduct any and all necessary business. The changes are expected to achieve greater consistency and efficiency in the CTC schedule. More importantly, staff remains committed to calling special meetings whenever a public safety matter requires the CTC to take action prior to its next regular meeting.
At its March 9, 2022, meeting, the CTC voted 4-0 to concur with the proposed changes and authorize staff to present a resolution for City Council approval. The changes, if approved, would be effective immediately.
7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. 11388
· CTC Staff Report
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
757
RESOLUTION NO. 11388
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ORANGE RESCINDING
RESOLUTION NO. 9640 AND SETTING THE
DATE AND TI ME OF MEETINGS OF THE
TRAFFIC COMMISSION.
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to set the day and time for the regular meetings of the Traffic Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orange as follows:
Section 1. The City Council hereby rescinds any prior resolution establishing the date and time of the Traffic Commission, including but not limited to Resolution No. 9640.
Section 2. The Traffic Commission shall meet in regular session on the second Wednesday of February, April, June, August, October, and December and shall convene at the hour of 5:30 p.m., except where such meeting date is a legal holiday observed by the City. If any regular meeting date should fall on a holiday, the meeting will be held on the following Thursday at the hour of 5:30 p.m. A special meeting may be called by the chair or a majority of the members of the Traffic Commission.
Section 3. Be it further resolved that this Resolution shall become operative immediately.
ADOPTED this ____ day of ____________________, 2022
Mark A. Murphy, Mayor, City of Orange
ATTEST:
Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
758
2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF ORANGE )
I, PAMELA COLEMAN, City Clerk of the City of Orange, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Orange at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 2022 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
759
Agenda Item
City Traffic Commission
Item #: 3.1. 3/9/2022 File #: 22-0092
TO: Chair and Members of the City Traffic Commission
THRU:
FROM: Larry Tay, City Traffic Engineer
1. SUBJECT
Proposed modifications to the City Traffic Commission Schedule
2. SUMMARY
As currently prescribed by resolution of the City Council, regular meetings of the City Traffic Commission (CTC) are scheduled to occur monthly unless cancelled. The recent volume of consideration items presented to the CTC is such that has resulted in random cancellations due to lack of agenda items. A reduced, bi-monthly schedule would result in a similar number of meetings actually taking place, but with greater scheduling consistency.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Concur with the proposed bi-monthly CTC meeting schedule presented herein; and authorize staff to present to the City Council for approval
4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Provide for a safe community
a. Provide staffing and resources to deliver services that ensure public safety.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
The attached City Council Resolution No. 9640 fixes the CTC schedule as follows:
· Traffic Commission shall meet in regular session on the second Wednesday of every month and convene at the hour of 5:30 PM;
· If any regular meeting date should fall on a holiday, the same day in the following week shall be designated as the meeting day; and
· Special meetings may be called by the Chairman or a majority of the Commission.
Notwithstanding the above, recent trends in the number of action items brought forward each year have indicated that monthly meetings are no longer necessary for the CTC to fulfill its responsibilities.
In fact, since 2016, the CTC has convened, on average, 5-6 times per year to consider, on average, 2-3 agenda items per meeting. The presumption of a monthly meeting combined with the potential City of Orange Printed on 3/3/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
760
Item #: 3.1. 3/9/2022 File #: 22-0092
2-3 agenda items per meeting. The presumption of a monthly meeting combined with the potential lack of agenda items has led to a number of random meeting cancellations, with the resulting scheduling inconsistency being a potential source of confusion.
To address this, staff proposes the following CTC schedule:
· Reduce the meeting frequency, from monthly to bi-monthly, with regular meetings to occur on the second Wednesday of every even-numbered month (February, April, June, August, October, and December);
· Retain the 5:30 start time; holiday provision; and ability to call special meetings.
It is staff’sbelief that the aforementioned proposal will appropriately reduce the meeting frequency while providing sufficient flexibility to conduct all necessary business. Moreover, a reduction in the meeting frequency would provide more consistency and, more importantly, certainty in the CTC schedule. And, it would reduce the occurrence of cancellations and “single-item”agendas which, from a resource allocation perspective, is becoming inefficient. Lastly, staff will remain committed to calling special meetings anytime a public safety matter requires the CTC to take action before its next regularly scheduled meeting.
Staff respectfully recommends that the CTC concur with the proposed schedule and authorize staff to present a corresponding resolution to the City Council for approval.
7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution 9640
City of Orange Printed on 3/3/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
761
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 6.1. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0052
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Rob Houston, City Manager
FROM: Pamela Coleman, City Clerk
1. SUBJECT
Annual presentation of Local Appointments List of all City Boards, Commissions, and Committees.
2. SUMMARY
Government Code Section 54972, commonly known as the Maddy Act, requires the preparation of a list of all regular and ongoing boards, commissions, and committees which are appointed by the legislative body of the local agency known as the Local Appointments List. The attached Local Appointments List contains the following required information: 1) the board, commission, or committee title; 2) incumbent appointee name; 3) appointment date; 4) date term expires; and 5) the necessary qualifications for the position.
This information is provided for City Council consideration. Any changes and/or deactivation of any board, commission, or committee is at Council discretion.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Take action on the Mayor’s recommendation to reaffirm the following eligible existing appointments: CDBG Program Committee Member Jonathan St. Clair for a two-year term expiring June 30, 2024; Library Board of Trustee Member Rebecca Martinez for a three-year term expiring June 30, 2025; and Planning Commissioners David Vazquez and Rick Martinez for four-year terms respectively expiring June 30, 2026.
2. Confirm Mayor Murphy’s recommendation for appointment to the vacant position on the Library Board of Trustees to be presented at the meeting for a three-year term expiring on June 30, 2025.
3. Accept the Local Appointments List and direct the City Clerk to post pursuant to the Maddy Act.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact in the appointment of committee members.
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
This action does not correlate to any of the adopted strategic plan goals.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
The Maddy Act was enacted for the purpose of increasing public awareness of available City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
762
Item #: 6.1. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0052
The Maddy Act was enacted for the purpose of increasing public awareness of available appointments by any local government and providing local appointive powers access to a talent resource otherwise untapped.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 40605, the elected Mayor, with the approval of the City Council, makes all appointments to City boards, commissions, and committees unless otherwise specifically provided by statute.
Currently, there are three vacancies (CDBG, Library Board and Park Planning & Community Events Commission); two positions with expired terms not eligible for reappointment (CDBG and Traffic Commission); and four positions with terms ending June 30, 2022, eligible for reappointment on the following boards, commissions, and committees:
CDBG Program Committee (two-year term of office)
· 1 vacancy due to resignation of Janice Mickelson-Weilmuenster · 1 expired term eligible for reappointment (Jonathan St. Clair) · 1 expired term not eligible for reappointment (Fernando Rico) Orange Public Library Board of Trustees (three-year term of office) · 1 expired term eligible for reappointment (Rebecca Martinez) · 1 unscheduled vacancy due the resignation of Steve Freeman Park Planning & Community Events Commission (four-year term of office) · 1 vacancy
Planning Commission (four-year term of office)
· 2 expired terms eligible for reappointment (David Vazquez and Rick Martinez) Traffic Commission (four-year term of office)
· 1 expired term not eligible for reappointment (Jim Beil) Per Council direction at the March 8, 2022, meeting, staff has prepared the necessary resolution(s) and ordinance(s) to merge the Investment Advisory Committee and Audit Committee into a new committee. It is on tonight’sagenda as Item 7.1. Both committees have been removed from the Local Appointments List and the new Investment and Audit Committee will be added if the Council approves the change.
In accordance with the Maddy Act, once accepted by the City Council, the list will be posted on the City’swebsite, at the Main Library, and in the City Clerk’soffice. Depending on Council direction, the City Clerk’s Office will update the list as appointments are confirmed.
7. ATTACHMENTS
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
763
Item #: 6.1. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0052
· Local Appointments List
· Attendance Reports
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
764
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 6.1. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0052
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Rob Houston, City Manager
FROM: Pamela Coleman, City Clerk
1. SUBJECT
Annual presentation of Local Appointments List of all City Boards, Commissions, and Committees.
2. SUMMARY
Government Code Section 54972, commonly known as the Maddy Act, requires the preparation of a list of all regular and ongoing boards, commissions, and committees which are appointed by the legislative body of the local agency known as the Local Appointments List. The attached Local Appointments List contains the following required information: 1) the board, commission, or committee title; 2) incumbent appointee name; 3) appointment date; 4) date term expires; and 5) the necessary qualifications for the position.
This information is provided for City Council consideration. Any changes and/or deactivation of any board, commission, or committee is at Council discretion.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Take action on the Mayor’s recommendation to reaffirm the following eligible existing appointments: CDBG Program Committee Member Jonathan St. Clair for a two-year term expiring June 30, 2024; Library Board of Trustee Member Rebecca Martinez for a three-year term expiring June 30, 2025; and Planning Commissioners David Vazquez and Rick Martinez for four-year terms respectively expiring June 30, 2026.
2. Confirm Mayor Murphy’s recommendation for appointment to the vacant position on the Library Board of Trustees to be presented at the meeting for a three-year term expiring on June 30, 2025.
3. Accept the Local Appointments List and direct the City Clerk to post pursuant to the Maddy Act.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact in the appointment of committee members.
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
This action does not correlate to any of the adopted strategic plan goals.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
The Maddy Act was enacted for the purpose of increasing public awareness of available City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
765
Item #: 6.1. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0052
The Maddy Act was enacted for the purpose of increasing public awareness of available appointments by any local government and providing local appointive powers access to a talent resource otherwise untapped.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 40605, the elected Mayor, with the approval of the City Council, makes all appointments to City boards, commissions, and committees unless otherwise specifically provided by statute.
Currently, there are three vacancies (CDBG, Library Board and Park Planning & Community Events Commission); two positions with expired terms not eligible for reappointment (CDBG and Traffic Commission); and four positions with terms ending June 30, 2022, eligible for reappointment on the following boards, commissions, and committees:
CDBG Program Committee (two-year term of office)
· 1 vacancy due to resignation of Janice Mickelson-Weilmuenster · 1 expired term eligible for reappointment (Jonathan St. Clair) · 1 expired term not eligible for reappointment (Fernando Rico) Orange Public Library Board of Trustees (three-year term of office) · 1 expired term eligible for reappointment (Rebecca Martinez) · 1 unscheduled vacancy due the resignation of Steve Freeman Park Planning & Community Events Commission (four-year term of office) · 1 vacancy
Planning Commission (four-year term of office)
· 2 expired terms eligible for reappointment (David Vazquez and Rick Martinez) Traffic Commission (four-year term of office)
· 1 expired term not eligible for reappointment (Jim Beil) Per Council direction at the March 8, 2022, meeting, staff has prepared the necessary resolution(s) and ordinance(s) to merge the Investment Advisory Committee and Audit Committee into a new committee. It is on tonight’sagenda as Item 7.1. Both committees have been removed from the Local Appointments List and the new Investment and Audit Committee will be added if the Council approves the change.
In accordance with the Maddy Act, once accepted by the City Council, the list will be posted on the City’swebsite, at the Main Library, and in the City Clerk’soffice. Depending on Council direction, the City Clerk’s Office will update the list as appointments are confirmed.
7. ATTACHMENTS
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
766
Item #: 6.1. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0052
· Local Appointments List
· Attendance Reports
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
767
CITY OF ORANGE
2022 LOCAL APPOINTMENTS LIST
Pursuant to Government Code Section § 54972, the following Local Appointments List is posted on an annual basis by December 31. The list contains names and term of office for appointments to all regular Boards, Commissions, and Committees which are appointed by the City Council.
Note: The names on this list are subject to change based on term expirations and resignations that occur during the year. Further information regarding these vacancies may be obtained by calling the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 744-5500 or visiting the City’s website: www.cityoforange.org.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM COMMITTEE
Qualifications: The CDBG Program Committee shall consist of five (5) members whose primary residence is in the City of Orange. Members should show an interest in and have knowledge of housing and community development issues, especially as they relate to affordable housing and public service for residents of low and moderate income. (Qualifications per Resolution No. 11356).
Form 700 required and AB1661 Sexual Harassment Avoidance Training certificates required Terms of Office: The term of office shall be for two (2) years.* Meetings: Meetings are held as necessary during the CDBG funding cycle (November-April).
Name Appointed/Reappointed Term Expiration Date
Fernando Rico 6-24-2003 / 5-12-2012 6-30-2014
Jonathan St. Clair 6-8-2021 6-30-2024
Kim Le 6-8-2021 6-30-2023
Connie Benson 6-8-2021 6-30-2023
VACANT 6-30-2024
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
Qualifications: The Committee shall consist of five (5) members whose primary residence or primary place of employment is in the City. Committee members shall be qualified to analyze and interpret architectural and site planning information, including, but not limited to, licensed landscape architects, architects, urban planners, engineers and licensed general contractors. At least two members shall have professional experience in urban planning, architectural history or historic preservation and possess a general knowledge of architecture in the Old Towne Historic District. (Qualifications per Resolution No. 11356; duties are set forth in Section 17.08.020 of the Orange Municipal Code) Form 700 and AB1234 Ethics Education & AB1661 Sexual Harassment Avoidance Training certificates required
Terms of Office: The term of office shall be for four (4) years.* Meetings: Meetings are held on the first and third Wednesdays of each month at 5:30 p.m. (Resolution 9643)
768
Name Appointed/Reappointed Term Expiration Date
Carol Fox 1-10-2012 / 2-9-2021 6-30-2024
Robert Imboden 4-10-2012 / 2-9-2021 6-30-2024
Anne McDermott 3-10-2015 / 2-9-2021 6-30-2023
Mary Anne Skorpanich 8-8-2017 / 2-9-2021 6-30-2025
Jerico Farfan 7-13-2021 6-30-2025
ORANGE PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Qualifications: The Board shall consist of five (5) members whose primary residence is in the City of Orange. Trustees shall have an understanding and appreciation of the role of the public library in the community and in a democracy. Trustees should be library users and should value books and information delivery. (Education Code 18910)
Form 700 required and AB1661 Sexual Harassment Avoidance Training certificates required Terms of Office: The term of office shall be for three (3) years (Education Code 18911).* Meetings: Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month at 3:30 p.m. (Determined at its June annual meeting per Board of Trustees By-Laws.)
Name Appointed/Reappointed Term Expiration Date
Rebecca Martinez 1-12-2016 / 2-9-2021 6-30-2025
Susie Huber 7-14-2020 6-30-2023
Peggy Calvert 3-13-2018 / 2-9-2021 6-30-2024
Joseph Valencia 8-10-2021 6-30-2024
VACANT 6-30-2025
PARK PLANNING AND COMMUNITY EVENTS COMMISSION
Qualifications: The Commission shall consist of seven (7) members who shall have their primary residence in the City of Orange. Commissioners shall have knowledge of sports complexes and/or park development, and knowledge of City-sponsored events. (Qualifications per Resolution No. 11356; duties are set forth in Chapter 2.60 of the Orange Municipal Code) Form 700 required and AB1661 Sexual Harassment Avoidance Training certificates required Terms of Office: The term of office shall be for four (4) years (OMC 2.60.030).* Meetings: Meetings are held on the fourth Wednesdays of January, April, July, and October at 5:30 p.m. (Resolution No. 11355)
Name Appointed/Reappointed Term Expiration Date
Eva Perez 6-8-2021 6-30-2025
Chrissy Vaughn 6-8-2021 6-30-2025
Adam Litwin 6-8-2021 6-30-2025
Eugene Fields 6-8-2021 6-30-2025
Steve Freeman 7-13-2021 6-30-2025
Mike Rouse 7-13-2021 6-30-2025
VACANT
769
PLANNING COMMISSION
Qualifications: The Commission shall consist of five (5) members who shall have their primary residence in the City of Orange. Commission members shall have general knowledge of land use and development. (Qualifications per Resolution 11356; duties are set forth in Section 17.08.020 of the Orange Municipal Code)
Form 700 required (pursuant to California Government Code Section 87200) AB1234 Ethics Education & AB1661 Sexual Harassment Avoidance Training certificates required Terms of Office: The term of office shall be for four (4) years (OMC 2.64.020).* Meetings: Meetings are held on the first and third Mondays of each month at 7:00 p.m. (OMC
2.64.040)
Name Appointed/Reappointed Term Expiration Date
Ernie Glasgow 7-14-2015 / 2-9-2021 6-30-2023
David Simpson 9-8-2015 / 2-9-2021 6-30-2023
David Vazquez 2-12-2019 6-30-2026
Rick Martinez 1-8-2019 6-30-2026
Jonathan Trapesonian 8-10-2021 6-30-2023 (term to fill vacancy)
TRAFFIC COMMISSION
Qualifications: The Commission shall consist of five (5) members who shall have their primary residence in the City of Orange. Members review matters of traffic and transportation planning, requests for speed limit increase or decreases, complaints concerning traffic safety conditions, and other general duties as set forth in Chapter 10.06 of the Orange Municipal Code. City Traffic Commission duties are considered as advisory to the City Council. (Qualifications per Resolution No. 11356)
Form 700 and AB1234 Ethics Education & AB1661 Sexual Harassment Avoidance Training certificates required
Terms of Office: The term of office shall be for four (4) years (OMC 10.06.020).* Meetings: Meetings are held on the second Wednesday of each month at 5:30 p.m. (Resolution 9640) Name Appointed/Reappointed Term Expiration Date
Jim Beil 8-12-2003 / 5-22-2012 6-30-2016
Adam Feliz 3-10-2015 / 2-9-2021 6-30-2023
Christian Vaughan 5-10-2011 / 2-9-2021 6-30-2023
Larry Dick 1-12-2016 / 2-9-2021 6-30-2024
A.J. Ricci 6-8-2021 6-30-2025
*Per OMC Chapter 2.55.010, members of boards, commissions and committees may serve no more than 12 consecutive years on the board, commission or committee to which they are appointed. No member of a board, commission, or committee who has served 12 consecutive years shall be eligible for reappointment to the same board, commission or committee prior to the passage of a two-year interval.
Revised 3/29/2022
770
2021 Community Development Block Grant Attendance
Mickelson-Weilmuenster Manning Perez Rico
3/3/2021 Present Present Present Present Present Present 4/20/2021 Present Present Present Present Present Present 771
2021 DRC Attendance:
MEETING
DATE:
CAROL
FOX
ROBERT
IMBODEN
MARY ANNE
SKORPANICH
ANNE
McDERMOTT
JERICO
FARFAN
TIM
McCORMACK
01/06/21 X X E X X
01/20/21 MEETING CANCELED
02/03/21 X X X X X
02/18/21 X X X X X
03/03/21 X X X X X
03/17/21 MEETING CANCELED
04/07/21 X X X X X
04/21/21 X X X X X
05/05/21 X X X X X
05/19/21 X X X X X
06/02/21 X X X X X
06/16/21 MEETING CANCELED
07/08/21 X X X X X
07/21/21 X X X X E
08/04/21 X X X E X
08/18/21 X X X X X
09/01/21 X X X X X
09/15/21 X X X X X
10/06/21 X X X X E
10/20/21 MEETING CANCELED
11/03/21 X X X X X
11/17/21 X X X X E
12/01/21 MEETING CANCELED
12/15/21 X X E X X
E = Excused
A = Unexcused absence
MISSED
MEETING
NOT ON
COMMITTEE
772
2021 IAC Attendance Report:
MEETING DATE: ROBERT FOLEY* LARRY SALLINGER MARK MITTMAN 02/03/21 X X
05/04/21 MEETING CANCELED
08/04/21 ------------ X X
11/03/21 ------------ X X
*Robert Foley resigned from the committee in May 2021
773
2021 Library Board of Trustees Attendance
Members: Steve Freeman, Rebecca Martinez, Peggy Calvert, Sue Huber, Patti vanVoorst (last meeting was 8/16/21), Joseph Valencia (first meeting 9/20/21) Meeting Date All Members
Present
Members Absent
1/18/2021 X
2/22/2021 CANCELLED
3/15/2021 X vanVoorst, Huber (excused)
4/19/2021 X
5/17/2021 X
6/21/2021 CANCELLED
7/19/2021 X
8/16/2021 X
9/20/2021 X
10/18/2021 X
11/15/2021 X
12/20/2021 CANCELLED
774
2021 Park Planning and Community Events Commission Attendance:
Meeting
Date
Eugene
Fields
Steve
Freeman
Adam
Litwin
Eva
Perez
Mike
Rouse
Christine
Vaughn
Vacant
10/27/2021
775
2021 Planning Commission Attendance
Glasgow Martinez Simpson Trapesonian Vazquez Willits
4-Jan CANCELLED
18-Jan Present Present Present N/A Present Present
1-Feb Present Present Present N/A Present Present
17-Feb Present Present Present N/A Present Present
1-Mar CANCELLED
15-Mar Present Present Present N/A Present Present
5-Apr Present Present Present N/A Present Present
19-Apr Present Present Present N/A Present Present
3-May CANCELLED
17-May Present Present Present N/A Present Present
7-Jun Present Present Present N/A Present Present
21-Jun CANCELLED
7-Jul CANCELLED
19-Jul Present Present Present N/A Present
2-Aug Present Present Present N/A Present
16-Aug CANCELLED
8-Sep Present Present Present Present E
20-Sep Present Present Present Present Present
4-Oct Present Present Present Present Present
18-Oct CANCELLED
1-Nov CANCELLED
15-Nov Present E Present Present Present
6-Dec Present Present E Present Present
20-Dec CANCELLED
E = Excused
A = Unexcused absence
Trapesonian appointed: 8/10/2021
Willits last meeting:6/7/2021
776
2021 CTC Attendance:
MEETING
DATE:
Jim Beil Larry Dick Adam Feliz Christian
Vaughan
Michael
Lebeau
A.J. Ricci
01/13/21 MEETING CANCELED
02/10/21 MEETING CANCELED
03/10/21 MEETING CANCELED
04/14/21 X X X X X
05/12/21 X X X X X
06/09/21 X X X X x
7/14/21 MEETING CANCELED
08/11/21 X E X X X
09/08/21 MEETING CANCELED
10/13/21 MEETING CANCELED
10/14/21 X X X X X
11/10/21 MEETING CANCELED
12/08/21 X E X X X
E = Excused
A = Unexcused absence
MISSED
MEETING
NOT ON
COMMITTEE
777
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 7.1. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0209
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Rob Houston, City Manager
FROM: Will Kolbow, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director
1. SUBJECT
Merging of the Investment Advisory Committee and Audit Committee. Resolution No. 11387 and Ordinance No. 02-22.
2. SUMMARY
The City’sAudit Committee and Investment Advisory and Oversight Committees provide a critical oversight role over the City’sfinancial reporting and investment activities, respectively. However, due to the unique qualifications of the Audit and Investment Advisory committees, it has proven difficult to fill the vacancies that exist in the committees. Additionally, the City’scurrent Investment Oversight Committee provides a duplicate function to the Investment Advisory Committee. Therefore, in order to ensure the functions of both committees continue and for efficiency purposes, staff is recommending the City Council merge the two committees into one new committee entitled the Investment and Audit Committee, and eliminate the Investment Oversight Committee.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Adopt Resolution No. 11387. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange Eliminating the Audit Committee and the Investment Advisory Committee, Establishing a New Investment and Audit Committee, Repealing Resolution Nos. 10166 and 11356, and Stating Qualifications for Appointment to All City Council Created Committees.
2. Introduce and Conduct First Reading of Ordinance No. 02-22. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Orange Repealing Chapter 2.50 of the Orange Municipal Code to Eliminate the Investment Oversight Committee Due to the Creation of the Investment and Audit Committee.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 2: Be a fiscally healthy community
a: Expend fiscal resources responsibly.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
The City’sAudit Committee and Investment Advisory and Oversight Committees provide a critical oversight role over the City’sfinancial reporting and investment activities, respectively. However, due to the unique qualifications of the Audit and Investment Advisory committees, it has proven difficult to City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
778
Item #: 7.1. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0209
fill the vacancies that exist on both committees.
Background
The Audit Committee was established in July 1997 and consists of the City Treasurer and four citizen representatives. Its purpose is to select the City’sindependent financial statement auditor, monitor and evaluate the audit, and act as a direct communications link between the City Council and the independent auditors. The committee last met in July 2011 and has not met since due to a lack of quorum. The committee currently has two members: City Treasurer Richard Rohm and Jordan Prell, who was appointed this past August.
The Investment Advisory Committee (IAC) was created in April 1995 and consists of three citizen representatives. The purpose of the IAC is to review the City’sStatement of Investment Policy and Treasurer reports, provide advice regarding potential investment strategies, and provide written recommendations to the Investment Oversight Committee. The IAC currently has two members:
Larry Sallinger and Mark Mittmann. Mr. Sallinger has served beyond the 12-year limit as contemplated by the OMC but continues to serve until a replacement is named. The third seat on the IAC has been vacant for several years.
The Investment Oversight Committee (IOC) was created by Ordinance in August 1992 and is codified in the Orange Municipal Code (OMC), Chapter 2.50. It consists of the City Treasurer, who acts as Chair, the City Manager or their designee, who is the Vice Chair, and the Finance Director. Its purpose is to review the City’sStatement of Investment Policy, monitor the compliance of the City’s investments with the Policy, and report to the City Council the recommendations of the IAC.
Recommendations
Staff has diligently attempted to find qualified candidates for consideration to fill both committees.
However, most of the individuals that have applied for both committees do not meet the qualifications of either. Due to the ongoing difficulty of filling the respective committees, and to ensure that the important work of both committees continues, staff recommends that the City Council create a new Committee to combine the functions of the IAC and Audit Committee. The qualifications of the Committee could be any combination of the prior committees, with at least one member meeting the qualifications of the IAC and one meeting the qualifications of the Audit Committee, to ensure there is expertise in each area that the Committee covers. Further, staff recommends membership consist of the City Treasurer and a total of four citizen representatives. Staff presented this approach to the Council at the March 8, 2022 City Council meeting.
Procedurally, should the City Council approves this change, this would be a new committee and the appointments to the seats would be subject to the procedures of the Maddy Act. Existing members of both current committees would be eligible to apply for the newly created seats.
Finally, since the IOC functions are largely duplicated by the IAC, and the City Manager and Finance Director already act as staff for both the IAC and Audit Committee, staff also recommends that the City Council repeal OMC Chapter 2.50, eliminating the IOC, and designate the new Investment and Audit Committee as a direct advisory committee to the City Council.
7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. 11387
· Ordinance No. 02-22
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
779
Item #: 7.1. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0209
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
780
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 7.1. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0209
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Rob Houston, City Manager
FROM: Will Kolbow, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director
1. SUBJECT
Merging of the Investment Advisory Committee and Audit Committee. Resolution No. 11387 and Ordinance No. 02-22.
2. SUMMARY
The City’sAudit Committee and Investment Advisory and Oversight Committees provide a critical oversight role over the City’sfinancial reporting and investment activities, respectively. However, due to the unique qualifications of the Audit and Investment Advisory committees, it has proven difficult to fill the vacancies that exist in the committees. Additionally, the City’scurrent Investment Oversight Committee provides a duplicate function to the Investment Advisory Committee. Therefore, in order to ensure the functions of both committees continue and for efficiency purposes, staff is recommending the City Council merge the two committees into one new committee entitled the Investment and Audit Committee, and eliminate the Investment Oversight Committee.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Adopt Resolution No. 11387. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange Eliminating the Audit Committee and the Investment Advisory Committee, Establishing a New Investment and Audit Committee, Repealing Resolution Nos. 10166 and 11356, and Stating Qualifications for Appointment to All City Council Created Committees.
2. Introduce and Conduct First Reading of Ordinance No. 02-22. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Orange Repealing Chapter 2.50 of the Orange Municipal Code to Eliminate the Investment Oversight Committee Due to the Creation of the Investment and Audit Committee.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 2: Be a fiscally healthy community
a: Expend fiscal resources responsibly.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
The City’sAudit Committee and Investment Advisory and Oversight Committees provide a critical oversight role over the City’sfinancial reporting and investment activities, respectively. However, due to the unique qualifications of the Audit and Investment Advisory committees, it has proven difficult to City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
781
Item #: 7.1. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0209
fill the vacancies that exist on both committees.
Background
The Audit Committee was established in July 1997 and consists of the City Treasurer and four citizen representatives. Its purpose is to select the City’sindependent financial statement auditor, monitor and evaluate the audit, and act as a direct communications link between the City Council and the independent auditors. The committee last met in July 2011 and has not met since due to a lack of quorum. The committee currently has two members: City Treasurer Richard Rohm and Jordan Prell, who was appointed this past August.
The Investment Advisory Committee (IAC) was created in April 1995 and consists of three citizen representatives. The purpose of the IAC is to review the City’sStatement of Investment Policy and Treasurer reports, provide advice regarding potential investment strategies, and provide written recommendations to the Investment Oversight Committee. The IAC currently has two members:
Larry Sallinger and Mark Mittmann. Mr. Sallinger has served beyond the 12-year limit as contemplated by the OMC but continues to serve until a replacement is named. The third seat on the IAC has been vacant for several years.
The Investment Oversight Committee (IOC) was created by Ordinance in August 1992 and is codified in the Orange Municipal Code (OMC), Chapter 2.50. It consists of the City Treasurer, who acts as Chair, the City Manager or their designee, who is the Vice Chair, and the Finance Director. Its purpose is to review the City’sStatement of Investment Policy, monitor the compliance of the City’s investments with the Policy, and report to the City Council the recommendations of the IAC.
Recommendations
Staff has diligently attempted to find qualified candidates for consideration to fill both committees.
However, most of the individuals that have applied for both committees do not meet the qualifications of either. Due to the ongoing difficulty of filling the respective committees, and to ensure that the important work of both committees continues, staff recommends that the City Council create a new Committee to combine the functions of the IAC and Audit Committee. The qualifications of the Committee could be any combination of the prior committees, with at least one member meeting the qualifications of the IAC and one meeting the qualifications of the Audit Committee, to ensure there is expertise in each area that the Committee covers. Further, staff recommends membership consist of the City Treasurer and a total of four citizen representatives. Staff presented this approach to the Council at the March 8, 2022 City Council meeting.
Procedurally, should the City Council approves this change, this would be a new committee and the appointments to the seats would be subject to the procedures of the Maddy Act. Existing members of both current committees would be eligible to apply for the newly created seats.
Finally, since the IOC functions are largely duplicated by the IAC, and the City Manager and Finance Director already act as staff for both the IAC and Audit Committee, staff also recommends that the City Council repeal OMC Chapter 2.50, eliminating the IOC, and designate the new Investment and Audit Committee as a direct advisory committee to the City Council.
7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. 11387
· Ordinance No. 02-22
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
782
Item #: 7.1. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0209
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
783
RESOLUTION NO. 11387
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ORANGE
ELIMINATING THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
AND THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY
COMMITTEE, ESTABLISHING A NEW
INVESTMENT AND AUDIT COMMITTEE,
REPEALING RESOLUTION NO S. 10166
AND 11356, AND STATING
QUALIFICATIONS FOR APPOINTMENT
TO ALL CITY COUNCIL CREATED
COMMITTEES.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orange creates boards, commissions, and committees to assist in the carrying out of the City’s business and to further the public interest; and
WHEREAS, on September 14, 2021 by Resolution No. 11356, the City Council established criteria for such boards, commissions, and committees; and
WHEREAS, the City Council established the Audit Committee and the Investment Advisory Committee in July 1997 to provide advice and recommendations and to assist the City Council in discharging its responsibility for the overall stewardship of the City’s financial affairs including review of City investments; and
WHEREAS, despite efforts by the City to find qualified candidates, the Audit Committee and the Investment Advisory Committee currently have vacancies that remain unfilled and, in some cases, are unable to establish a quorum; and
WHEREAS, the purpos es of the existing Audit Committee and Investment Advisory Committee are vital to the proper oversight of the City’s financial affairs; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that combining the functions of these two Committees into one, named the Investment and Audit Committee, will ensure that the purposes of each Committee are carried out in an effective manner by a full Committee of qualified members; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to revise and update the membership criteria for citiz en appointment to such boards, commissions, and committees to reflect the elimination of the Audit Committee and the Investment Advisory Committee and creation of the Investment and Audit Committee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orange as follows:
784
2 1. That Resolution Nos. 10166 and 11356 are hereby repealed in their entirety.
2. That the Audit Committee and the Investment Advisory Committee of the City of Orange are hereby eliminated in their entirety.
3. That the Investment and Audit Committee of the City of Orange is hereby created as set forth in Exhibit A.
4. That in order to be considered for appointment to specified City Council created boards, commissions, or committees, a citizen must fulfill the applicable qualifications set forth in attached Exhibit A and, pursuant to Orange Municipal Code Section 2.55.020, must meet these qualifications at all times while serving as a member of such board, commission, or committee.
ADOPTED this ____ day of ____________________, 2022
Mark A. Murphy, Mayor, City of Orange
ATTEST:
Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF ORANGE )
I, PAMELA COLEMAN, City Clerk of the City of Orange, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Orange at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 2022 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
785
EXHIBIT A
QUALIFICATIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL CREATED COMMITTEES
1. Community Development Block Grant Program Committee
• Number: The Committee shall consist of five members
• Qualifications: Members shall have their primary residence in the City.
Members should show an interest in and knowledge of housing and community develo pment issues, especially as they relate to affordable housing and public service for residents of low and moderate income. • Purpose: To provide a public engagement process in the allocation of CDBG funds as required by 24 C.F.R. Part 91.105
• Duties: Duties are set forth in the CDBG Program Policies and Procedures Manual maintained by the City.
• Compensation: None.
2. Design Review Committee
• Number: The Committee shall consist of five members.
• Qualifications: Members shall have their primary residence or primary place of employment in the City. Members shall be qualified to analyze and interpret architectural and site planning information, including, but not limited to, licensed landscape architects, architec ts, urban planners, engineers and licensed general contractors. At least two members shall have professional experience in urban planning, architectural history or historic preservation and possess a general knowledge of architecture in the Old Towne Historic District.
• Purpose: As set forth in Section 17.08.020.D of the Orange Municipal Code. • Duties: Duties are set forth in Section 17.08.020.D of the Orange Municipal Code.
• Compensation: As determined by Resolution of the City Council.
3. Investment and Audit Committee
• Number: The Committee shall consist of five members: the City Treasurer and four citizen representatives.
• Term: Two years with staggered terms. For the initial Committee, two of the four citizen representatives shall be appointed to a one -year term, then henceforth those two seats shall be appointed every two years. • Qualifications: The qualifications of the applicants for the citizen representatives will be reviewed by the City Manager, the Finance Director, and an outside expert in finance, investments, or auditing. Those candidates passing the qualification review process will be presented to the Mayor.
These citizen Committee members shall then be appointed by the City Council in accordance with procedures established for appointing members of the City’s commissions, boards, and committees. The citizen representatives must reside or be permanently employed in the City of 786
Orange. In addition, they must meet at least one of the following criteria:
(a) have the designation of Certified Publi c Accountant (CPA) or other business-related experience; and/or (b) have substantial education and demonstrated managerial experience [of no less than five years] in one or more of the following areas: investment banking, investment brokerage and sales, in vestment management, financial management and planning, or commercial banking. The City Council shall endeavor to ensure that there is at least one citizen representative that meets the qualifications of criteria (a) above, and one citizen representative that meets the qualifications of criteria (b) above. No member of the Committee shall be financially interested in any contract, or otherwise conduct any business with any member of the City Council, the City Manager, the Finance Director, the City Treasurer, or the City or any of its agencies, either on an individual basis or as a partner, major shareholder, member, or employee of any firm. • Purpose: The primary purpose of the Committee is to assist the City Council in discharging its responsibility for t he overall stewardship of the City’s financial affairs, including determining that the City’s investments are consistent with the City’s investment policy’s principal objectives of safety first, liquidity second, and total rate of return third. • Duties: The Investment and Audit Committee reports to and acts as an advisory body to the City Council, and is to augment management’s accountability to the City Council. The Committee shall act solely as an advisory body and shall not exercise decision-making authority, nor shall it be involved in day -to-day financial and accounting operations of the City.
The Committee shall not make, or direct City staff to make, any particular investment, purchase any particular investment products, or do business with any particular investment companies, brokers, or advisors. • Its duties shall consist of the following:
o Select the independent financial auditor for the financial statement audit;
o Monitor the progress and evaluate the results of the financial statement audit;
o Ensure the prompt and effective remedy of any control weaknesses and legal compliance violations identified in the course of the financial statement audit;
o Serve as a direct communications link between the City Council and the independent auditor;
o Monitor the adequacy of the City’s internal control structure on an ongoing basis, such as cash disbursements, cash receipting, treasury transactions, etc., as examined by the internal audit function and the independent financial auditor;
o Review results of contract compliance audits and financial statement reviews conducted by the City’s internal audit function, such as trash contracts, internal controls, and revenue audits; o Review results of compliance audits and reviews conducted by outside agencies, such as Department of Transportation grants, M2 787
funds for the Senior Mobility program and the Ground Emergency Medical Transport (GEMT) supplemental reimbursement program; o Review the City’s Investment Policy annually and recommend revisions as necessary;
o Review the Treasurer’s Report as defined by the State of California Government Code Section 53646 to ensure conformance with the City’s Statement of Investment Policy and review related factors such as risk, diversification, and maturity;
o Provide advice regarding potential investment, potential investment strategies, and suitability of pools such as the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF);
o Provide written recommendations to the City Council;
o Maintain minutes of the Committee proceedings and report to the City Council quarterly.
• Compensation: None.
• Meetings: The Committee will meet at least once each quarter and shall hold other meetings on an as needed basis. Meetings will be conducted in compliance with the Brown Act. Meeting days and times shall be established by separate Resolution of the City Council.
4. Park Planning and Community Events Commission
• Number: The Commission shall consist of seven members. • Qualifications: Members shall have their primary residence in the City.
Committee members shall have knowledge of sports complexes and/or park development, and knowledge of City-sponsored events.
• Duties: Duties are set forth in Chapter 2.60 of the Orange Municipal Code. • Compensation: None.
5. Planning Commission
• Number: The Commission shall consist of five members. • Qualifications: Members shall have their primary residence in the City.
Members shall have general knowledge of land use and development. • Purpose: As set forth in Section 17.08.020.B
• Duties: Duties are set forth in Section 17.08.020 of the Orange Municipal Code.
• Compensation: As determined by Resolution of the City Council.
6. Traffic Commission
• Number: The Commission shall consist of five members. • Qualifications: The Commission members shall have their primary residence in the City. One member shall be submitted to the Mayor for appointment by the Orange Unified School District. The Chief of Police or designee and the City Traffic Engineer or designee, shall be n on-voting members of the Commission.
• Duties: Duties are set forth in Chapter 10.06 of the Orange Municipal Code. • Compensation: None.
788
ORDINANCE NO. 02-22
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ORANGE REPEALING
CHAPTER 2.50 OF THE ORANGE
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ELIMINATE THE
INVESTMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
DUE TO THE CREATION OF THE
INVESTMENT AND AUDIT COMMITTEE.
WHEREAS, the City of Orange (“City”) is a general law city, duly organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, Section 53600 et seq. of the Government Code sets forth investment authority in the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Orange Municipal Code Chapter 2.50 sets forth the duties and responsibilities of the Investment Oversight Committee; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution No. 11387, which established the Investment and Audit Committee among other provisions; and
WHEREAS, the new Investment and Audit Committee shares the same duties and responsibilities as the Investment Oversight Committee; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the existence of the new Investment and Audit Committee and the duties and responsibilities of the City Treasurer, City Manager, and Finance Director , in their roles as defined by the Orange Municipal Code, provide sufficient oversight of the City’s investments;
NOW, THEREFORE , the City Council of the City of Orange does ordain as follows:
SECTION I:
Chapter 2.50 of the Orange Municipal Code (Administration and Personnel – Investment Oversight Committee) is hereby repealed in its entirety.
SECTION II:
If any section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one (or more) section, 789
2 subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase had been declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION III:
The City Clerk is hereby directed to certify the adoption of this Ordinance and cause a summary of the same to be published as required by law. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days from and after the date of its final passage.
ADOPTED this ____ day of ___________________, 2022.
Mark A. Murphy, Mayor, City of Orange
ATTEST:
Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF ORANGE )
I, PAMELA COLEMAN, City Clerk of the City of Orange, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at the regular meeting of the City Council held on the ___ day of _____________, 2022, and thereafter at the regular meeting of said City Council duly held on the ___ day of ____________, 2022 was duly passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
790
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 7.2. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0221
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Rob Houston, City Manager
FROM: Christopher Cash, Public Works Director
1. SUBJECT
Request for permit parking on a portion of Collins Avenue. Resolution No. 11385.
2. SUMMARY
A request for permit parking was initiated by a resident in the affected neighborhood. The request meets the criteria and requirements delineated in the City’sNeighborhood Permit Parking Program.
Permit Parking Area “X”(Area “X”)has been approved by the City Traffic Commission and is being forwarded to the City Council for final approval.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Approve permit parking on the south side of Collins Avenue between Hart Street and 2842 E.
Collins Ave.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 11385. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange rescinding Resolution No. 11370 and adopting a revised master resolution of permit parking areas within the City of Orange.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
The total expenditure for the project is $500 and will be funded in minor Traffic Control Devices (16302) through Traffic Improvement Measure M2 (263).
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Provide for a safe community
b. Provide and maintain infrastructure necessary to ensure the safety of the public.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
The City’s Neighborhood Permit Parking Program (NPPP) provides a mechanism for protecting residential streets from commercial parking overflow. Under the City’sNPPP guidelines, a request for permit parking may be initiated by a resident in an affected neighborhood.
Staff received such a request for permit parking on the south side of Collins Avenue between Hart Street and the easterly residence at 2842 E. Collins Avenue. This segment of Collins Avenue is just over a block in length and affects ten parking spaces.
A review of the residential streets adjoining the study area, specifically Hart Street and Barkley Avenue, were also evaluated. The results of the evaluation indicated that parking demand on these City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
791
Item #: 7.2. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0221
Avenue, were also evaluated. The results of the evaluation indicated that parking demand on these streets does not appear high enough to meet parking occupancy thresholds, even if all ten vehicles displaced from Collins Avenue were to move into the adjoining neighborhood. In addition, any displacement of vehicles is likely to distribute among various streets in a manner that would minimize impacts to any one location. Therefore, the proposed permit parking area was confined to the originally requested limits and is similar in size to several previously approved permit parking areas within the city.
Parking Occupancy
In order for permit parking to be considered, at least 75 percent of the available on-street parking in the study area must be occupied during the perceived problem times. Staff conducted a parking occupancy study, the result of which indicated that approximately 82.9 percent of the available on street parking was being used on a recurring basis. Thus, the occupancy requirement is satisfied.
Residential Support
In addition, at least 75 percent of the area residents must support the proposal. Petition forms returned to the City indicate that 88% of the affected property owners support permit parking, exceeding the minimum required.
Lastly, Collins Avenue satisfied all other requirements of the NPPP for permit parking consideration.
This matter was presented to the City Traffic Commission (CTC) at is February meeting, during which four speakers supported the item (none opposed.) The CTC then voted 4-0 to approve the request and forward to the City Council for final approval.
7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. 11385
· Area Map for Permit Area “X”
· February 2022 CTC Report
· February 2022 CTC Minutes
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
792
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 7.2. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0221
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Rob Houston, City Manager
FROM: Christopher Cash, Public Works Director
1. SUBJECT
Request for permit parking on a portion of Collins Avenue. Resolution No. 11385.
2. SUMMARY
A request for permit parking was initiated by a resident in the affected neighborhood. The request meets the criteria and requirements delineated in the City’sNeighborhood Permit Parking Program.
Permit Parking Area “X”(Area “X”)has been approved by the City Traffic Commission and is being forwarded to the City Council for final approval.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Approve permit parking on the south side of Collins Avenue between Hart Street and 2842 E.
Collins Ave.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 11385. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange rescinding Resolution No. 11370 and adopting a revised master resolution of permit parking areas within the City of Orange.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
The total expenditure for the project is $500 and will be funded in minor Traffic Control Devices (16302) through Traffic Improvement Measure M2 (263).
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Provide for a safe community
b. Provide and maintain infrastructure necessary to ensure the safety of the public.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
The City’s Neighborhood Permit Parking Program (NPPP) provides a mechanism for protecting residential streets from commercial parking overflow. Under the City’sNPPP guidelines, a request for permit parking may be initiated by a resident in an affected neighborhood.
Staff received such a request for permit parking on the south side of Collins Avenue between Hart Street and the easterly residence at 2842 E. Collins Avenue. This segment of Collins Avenue is just over a block in length and affects ten parking spaces.
A review of the residential streets adjoining the study area, specifically Hart Street and Barkley Avenue, were also evaluated. The results of the evaluation indicated that parking demand on these City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
793
Item #: 7.2. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0221
Avenue, were also evaluated. The results of the evaluation indicated that parking demand on these streets does not appear high enough to meet parking occupancy thresholds, even if all ten vehicles displaced from Collins Avenue were to move into the adjoining neighborhood. In addition, any displacement of vehicles is likely to distribute among various streets in a manner that would minimize impacts to any one location. Therefore, the proposed permit parking area was confined to the originally requested limits and is similar in size to several previously approved permit parking areas within the city.
Parking Occupancy
In order for permit parking to be considered, at least 75 percent of the available on-street parking in the study area must be occupied during the perceived problem times. Staff conducted a parking occupancy study, the result of which indicated that approximately 82.9 percent of the available on street parking was being used on a recurring basis. Thus, the occupancy requirement is satisfied.
Residential Support
In addition, at least 75 percent of the area residents must support the proposal. Petition forms returned to the City indicate that 88% of the affected property owners support permit parking, exceeding the minimum required.
Lastly, Collins Avenue satisfied all other requirements of the NPPP for permit parking consideration.
This matter was presented to the City Traffic Commission (CTC) at is February meeting, during which four speakers supported the item (none opposed.) The CTC then voted 4-0 to approve the request and forward to the City Council for final approval.
7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. 11385
· Area Map for Permit Area “X”
· February 2022 CTC Report
· February 2022 CTC Minutes
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
794
RESOLUTION NO. 11385
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ORANGE RESCINDING RESOLU TION
NO. 11370 AND ADOPTING A REVISED MASTER
RESOLUTION OF PERMIT PARKING AREAS
WITHIN THE CITY OF ORANGE.
WHEREAS, Chapter 10.30 of the Orange Municipal Code authorizes the City Council of the City of Orange to add or remove designated areas to the Neighborhood Permit Parking Program by resolution; and
WHEREAS, the creation of a master resolution which contains all the permit parking areas will compile all areas into a single document and eliminate the need to revise the Orange Municipal Code every time an area is added or deleted from the Neighborhood Permit Parking Program; and
WHEREAS, the rescission of Resolution No. 11370 is necessary to add Parking Permit Area “X” to the Master Resolution of Permit Parking Areas within the City of Orange.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED , by the City Council of the City of Orange as follows:
SECTION I:
That Res olution No. 11370 , adopted January 11, 2022 , is hereby rescinded, effective immediately upon the date of the adoption of Resolution No. 11385.
SECTION II:
That the following streets be added to the permit parking program as Area “X”:
South side of Collins Avenue from Hart Street to 2842 E. Collins Avenue.
SECTION III:
That the Master Resolution of Permit Parking Areas for the Neighborhood Permit Parking program attached hereto as Exhibit “A” is hereby adopted.
ADOPTED this ____ day of ____________________ 2022.
Mark A. Murphy, Mayor, City of Orange
ATTEST:
Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
795
2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF ORANGE )
I, PAMELA COLEMAN, City Clerk of the City of Orange, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Orange at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 2022 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
796
Exhibit A
EXHIBIT A
The following areas are all areas that have been approved by the City Council for inclusion in the Neighborhood Permit Parking Program and are subject to Chapter 10.30 of the Orange Municipal Code. Any additions or deletions to the Neighborhood Permit Parking Program shall be made by amending this Master Resolution.
CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD PERMIT PARKING AREA “A”
1. West side of Cambridge St. from Chapman Ave. to Lomita Ave. adjacent to residential land uses.
2. Both sides of Center St. from Chapman Ave. to Palm Ave. adjacent to residential land uses.
3. East side of Center St. from Palm Ave. to Walnut Ave.
4. Both sides of Cleveland St. from Chapman Ave. to Sycamore Ave. adjacent to residential land uses.
5. East side of Cypress St. from Palm Ave. to 637 feet north of Walnut Ave.
6. Both sides of Cypress St. from Walnut Ave. to Sycamore Ave.
7. Both sides of Everett Pl. from Shaffer St. to Glassell St.
8. Both sides of Glassell St. from Walnut Ave. to Rose Ave.
9. Both sides of Glassell St. from Lomita Ave. to Walnut Ave.
10. East side of Grand St. from Chapman Ave. to Maple Ave. adjacent to residential land uses.
11. Both sides of Grand St. from Maple Ave. to Palm Ave.
12. Both sides of Grand St. from Everett Pl. to Walnut Ave.
13. Both sides of Grand St. from Everett Pl. to Lomita Ave.
14. Both sides of Harwood St. from 146 feet north of Chapman Ave. to the northern terminus of Harwood St.
15. Both sides of Jefferson Ave. from Harwood St. to Shaffer St.
16. East side of Lemon St. from Chapman Ave. to Palm Ave. adjacent to residential land uses.
17. Both sides of Lemon St. from Palm Ave. to Walnut Ave. adjacent to residential land uses.
18. West side of Lemon St. from Walnut Ave. to 644 feet north of Walnut Ave.
19. Both sides of Lomita Ave. from Cambridge St. to Lemon St. adjacent to residential land uses.
20. Both sides of Maple Ave. from Cambridge to Cypress St. adjacent to residential land uses.
21. Both sides of Mayfair Ave. from Shaffer St. to Lemon St.
22. Both sides of Olive St. from Chapman Ave. to the northern terminus of Olive St. adjacent to residential land uses.
23. Both sides of Olive St. from Sycamore Ave. to Rose Ave.
24. Both sides of Orange St. from Maple Ave. and Palm Ave.
25. Both sides of Orange St. from Walnut Ave. to the northern terminus of Orange St.
26. Both sides of Orange St. from Lomita Ave. to the southern terminus of Orange St.
27. Both sides of Palm Ave. from Cambridge St. to Lemon St. adjacent to residential land uses.
28. Both sides of Rose Ave. from Glassell St. to Orange St.
29. Both sides of Shaffer St. from Chapman Ave. to Lomita Ave. adjacent to residential land uses.
30. Both sides of Sycamore Ave. from Cambridge St. to Center St. adjacent to residential land uses.
31. North side of Sycamore Ave. at 145 W. Sycamore Ave. adjacent to residential land uses.
32. Both sides of Walnut Ave. from Cambridge St. to Cypress St. adjacent to residential land uses.
33. Both sides of N. Shaffer St. between Chapman Ave. and Walnut Ave. 797
Exhibit A
34. Both sides of E. Maple Ave. between Shaffer St. and Cleveland Ave.
35. Both sides of E. Mayfair Ave. between Shaffer St. and Grand St.
AREA “B”
1. Both sides of Adams Ave. from Glassell St. to Grand St.
2. Both sides of Hoover Ave. from Glassell St. to Grand St.
3. Both sides of Quincy Ave. from Glassell St. to Grand St.
4. Both sides of Wilson Ave. from Glassell St. to Grand St.
AREA “C”
1. Both sides of Compton Ave. from Manchester Ave. to Lewis St.
2. East side of Lewis St. from the northerly property line at 4035 Compton Ave. to the southern property line of 119 N. Lewis St.
3. West side of Manchester Ave. from Sheringham Ave. to Compton Ave.
4. North side of Sheringham Ave. from Manchester Ave. to Windgap Dr.
5. South sides of Sheringham Ave. from Woodridge Cr. to Windgap Dr.
6. Both sides of Sunningdale Cr. from Compton Ave. south to include the cul-de-sac.
7. Both sides of Windgap Dr. from Compton Ave. south to include the cul-de-sac.
8. West side of Woodridge Cr. from Sheringham Ave. south to include the cul-de-sac.
9. East side of Woodridge Cr. from the northerly property line of 119 N. Woodridge Cr. south to include the cul-de-sac.
AREA “D”
1. Both sides of Dunas St. from Maple Ave. north to include the cul-de-sac.
2. Both sides of Maple Ave. from Prospect St. to Olympia Way.
3. Both sides of Olympia Way from Maple Ave. to Spring St.
4. Both sides of Shasta St. from Maple Ave. north to include the cul-de-sac.
5. Both sides of Vine Ave. from Olympia Way to its western terminus.
6. Both sides of First St. from Chapman Ave. north to include the cul-de-sac.
7. Both sides of Pearl Ave. from First St. to McPherson Rd.
8. East side of McPherson Rd. from 131 to 133 N. McPherson Rd.
AREA “E”
1. West side of Elm St. south of Sycamore Ave. to include the cul-de-sac.
AREA “F”
Permit Parking between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.
1. Both sides of Almond Ave. from Prospect St. to Violet Ln.
2. Both sides of Kathleen St. from Chapman Ave. to Palmyra Ave.
3. Both sides of Palmyra Ave. from Craig Dr. to Prospect St.
4. East side of Prospect St. from Almond Ave. to Palmyra Ave.
5. Both sides of Violet Ln. from Almond Ave. to Palmyra Ave.
AREA “G”
Permit Parking between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. 798
Exhibit A
1. Both sides of Euclid Ave. from James St. to Seranado St.
2. Both sides of James St. from Sycamore Ave. to Euclid Ave.
3. Both sides of Palm Ave. from Swidler St. to Seranado St.
4. Both sides of Sycamore Ave. from Swidler St. to Seranado St.
5. Both sides of Seranado St. from Spring St. to Walnut Ave.
6. Both sides of Silverleaf Ave. from Thomas St. to Seranado St.
7. Both sides of Spring St. from Swidler St. to Seranado St.
8. Both sides of Swidler St. from Spring St. to Walnut Ave.
9. Both sides of Thomas St. from Sycamore Ave. to Silverleaf Ave.
10. Both sides of Walnut Ave. from Swidler St. to Seranado St.
AREA “H”
1. Both sides of Shaffer St. beginning 390 feet north of Katella Ave. and ending at Trenton Ave. (R-1 zoned single-family residences only.)
AREA “I”
1. Both sides of Almond Ave. from Prospect St. to Dunas St.
2. Both sides of Century Ave. from James St. to Thomas St.
3. Both sides of Craig Dr. 100 feet south of Roberta Dr. to Prospect St.
4. Both sides of Dunas St. from Palmyra Ave. to Almond Ave.
5. Both sides of James St. from Century Dr. to LaVeta Ave.
6. North side of LaVeta Ave. from Prospect St. to Dunas St.
7. Both sides of Merelet Ln. from Craig Dr. to include the cul-de-sac.
8. Both sides of Olympia Way from Palmyra Ave. to Almond Ave.
9. North side of Palmyra Ave. from Prospect St. to Thomas St.
10. Both sides of Ruth Pl. easterly of James St.
11. Both sides of Ruth Pl. from Prospect St. to Olympia Way.
12. Both sides of Shasta St. from Palmyra Ave. to Almond Ave.
13. Both sides of Thomas St. from Century Dr. to Palmyra Ave.
AREA “J”
1. Both sides of Binnacle Ave. from Jetty Dr. to its easterly terminus.
2. North side of Chapman Ave. from Jetty Dr. to 4537 W. Chapman Ave.
3. North side of Chapman Ave. frontage road from Jetty Dr. to cul-de-sac.
4. Both sides of Grant Pl. from Chapman Ave. northerly to include the cul-de-sac.
5. Both sides of Jetty Dr. from Chapman Ave. to Sirius Ave.
6. West side of Lewis St. from Sirius Ave. to Simmons Ave.
7. South side of Simmons Ave. from Lewis St. to Spinnaker St.
8. Both sides of Sirius Ave. from Lewis St. to Jetty Dr.
9. Both sides of Spinnaker St. from Binnacle Ave. to Simmons Ave.
10. Both sides of Stay Court easterly of Jetty Dr.
11. Both sides of Tiller Ave. from Lewis St. to Spinnaker St.
AREA “K”
1. Both sides of the 2700 block of E. Bennett Ave.
2. Both sides of the 2700 block of E. Killingsworth Ave. 799
Exhibit A
3. Both sides of the 100-200 blocks of N. Malena Dr.
4. Both sides of the 2700 block of E. Sherman Ave.
5. Both sides of the 100-200 blocks of N. Wheeler St.
AREA “L”
1. Both sides of Jacaranda Ave. from Morgan St. to Mallard St.
2. Both sides of Juniper Ave. from Morgan St. to Mallard St.
3. Both sides of Mallard St. from Collins Ave. northerly to 985 N. Mallard St.
4. Both sides of Morgan St. from Collins Ave. northerly to 986 N. Morgan St.
AREA “M”
1. Both sides of Citrus St. from Almond Ave. to the southerly commercial property lines south of Chapman Ave.
AREA “N”
1. West side of Bedford Rd. from LaVeta Ave. to Bronson Ave.
AREA “O”
1. The north side of Spring St. from Hewes St. to Earlham St.
AREA “P”
1. Both sides of the 1000 block of Gardner Dr.
2. Both sides of the 1000 block of Greengrove St.
3. Both sides of Monroe Ave. from California St. to Lincoln St.
4. Both sides of Quincy Ave. from California St. to Lincoln St.
5. Both sides of Lincoln St. between Adams Ave. and Wilson Ave. including the cul-de-sac.
6. West side of Lincoln St. from 990 N. Lincoln St. to Adams Ave.
7. East side of Lincoln St. from 1073 N. Lincoln St. to Adams Ave.
8. Both sides of Adams Ave. between Lincoln St. and California St.
AREA “Q”
1. Both sides of the 8500 block of Biscayne Way
2. Both sides of the 8500 block of Deershire Ct.
3. Both sides of the 200 block of Fairfield Ln.
4. Both sides of the 200 block of Firenza Way
5. Both sides of the 8500 block of Heatherview Ln.
AREA ‘R’
1. Both sides of San Luis Drive from 7821 (north side) to Santa Cruz Avenue, and from 7816 (south side) to the beginning of 8132.
2. 8102 and 8110 Santa Cruz Avenue (south side).
3. Both sides of Santa Maria Street between San Luis Drive and Santa Cruz Avenue.
AREA “S”
1. Both sides of Poplar St. between Maple Ave. and the cul-de-sac. 800
Exhibit A
2. North side of Maple Ave. between Stevens St. and 1949 W. Maple Ave.
3. South side of Maple Ave. from Stevens St. to 2010 W. Maple Ave.
4. Both sides of Eckhoff St. between 130-283 N. Eckhoff St.
AREA “T”
1. Both sides of Cully Dr. from the westerly property lines of 861 and 864 W. Cully Dr. to the cul-de-sac.
2. Four spaces on the east side of Eckhoff Street from the southerly limit to W . Arbor Way (approximately 110 feet).
3. Five spaces on the east side of Eckhoff Street from 45 feet north of W. Arbor Way end of curb return to Maple Ave. (approximately 140 feet. It allows one parking space to remain in the permit parking program just north of the driveway at 2037 W. Arbor Way for visibility).
4. Three spaces on the east side of Eckhoff St. north of Willow Ave. to the northerly limit (approximately 70 feet).
5. Two spaces on the east side of Eckhoff St. from the existing red curb north of Maple Ave. to the driveway south of 206 N. Eckhoff St.
AREA “U”
1. Both sides of Waverly St. from the northerly property lines of 133 and 138 S. Waverly St. to Almond Ave.
AREA “V”
1. The south side of E. Rose Ave. from 1932/1934 to N. Highland St.
2. Both sides of N. Highland St. from E. Rose Ave. to E. Barkley Ave.
3. Both sides of E. Mayfair Ave. from 1740 E. Mayfair Ave. to N. Highland St.
4. The south side of E. Lomita Ave. from 1734/1736 to N. Highland St.
5. The north side of E. Lomita Ave. from 1901 to N. Highland St.
6. Both sides of E. Barkley Ave. from the cul-de-sac to N. Highland St.
7. Both sides of the cul-de-sacs of N. Victoria Drive, N. Russell Dr., and N. Shirley Dr., north of E. Mayfair Ave.
AREA “W”
1. Both sides of Madison Ave. from Wayfield St. to the cul-de-sac;
2. Both sides of Orange Grove Ave. from Wayfield St. to the westerly property lines of 1743/1744 E. Orange Grove Ave.
3. East side Wayfield St. between Orange Grove Ave. and the southerly property lines of 550/555 Wayfield St.
4. West side of Wayfield St. between Orange Grove Ave. and Madison Ave.
AREA “X”
1. South side of Collins Ave. from Hart St. to 2842 E. Collins Ave. 801
802
Agenda Item
City Traffic Commission
Item #: 4.1. 2/9/2022 File #: 22-0079
TO: Chair and Members of the City Traffic Commission
THRU: Larry Tay, City Traffic Engineer
FROM: Dave Allenbach, Transportation Analyst
1. SUBJECT
Request for permit parking on the south side of Collins Avenue from Hart Street to 2842 Collins Avenue.
2. SUMMARY
A request was made to implement permit parking on the aforementioned street. The request meets the requirements of the City’s Neighborhood Permit Parking Program, and received adequate support from affected residents.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve the request; and forward to the City Council for final approval
4. FISCAL IMPACT
The total expenditure for the project is $500 and will be funded in Minor Traffic Control Devices (16302) through Traffic Improvement Measure M2 (263).
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Provide for a safe community
b. Provide and maintain infrastructure necessary to ensure the safety of the public.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
In September 2021, the Traffic Engineering Division (“staff”)received a request that the south side of Collins Avenue between Hart Street and 2842 Collins Avenue (generally between Hart Street and Fire Station 2) be added to the City’sNeighborhood Parking Permit Program (NPPP.) This segment of Collins Avenue is just over one block in length and affects ten parking spaces. For permit parking to be considered, all NPPP guidelines and criteria must be met, including those for parking occupancy and neighborhood support.
Parking Occupancy
Staff mapped and counted the number of legal parking spaces in the affected area. Because the demand for on-street parking was highest in the evenings, staff conducted the parking observations during those hours. Beginning at 5:30 P.M., and progressively later each night, staff made seven observations in the subject neighborhood, including one Sunday observation. Per the City’sadopted NPPP, a street parking occupancy rate of 75% is required to qualify for permit parking. The level of City of Orange Printed on 3/31/2022Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
803
Item #: 4.1. 2/9/2022 File #: 22-0079
parking occupancy observed by staff for the study area is 82.9%.
Petition
Because the parking occupancy exceeded the minimum 75% threshold, a petition was circulated to determine the level of neighborhood support. A petition letter and a list of permit parking advantages and disadvantages were sent to each of the resident or absentee property owners and in the study area.
Affected Streets Households In Favor Households OpposedUnreturned Collins Ave. 8 87.5% 0 0% 1 12.5%
The above petition results indicate that this segment of Collins Avenue has 87.5% of property owners in favor of the permit parking program, which exceeds the minimum NPPP requirement of 75%.
Based on the above, the parking occupancy and petition support thresholds are satisfied. In addition, Collins Avenue satisfies all other requirements of the NPPP for permit parking consideration.
If approved, the Orange Police Department would issue the permits to eligible households Participation in the permit program is voluntary; however, after implementation any vehicle parked on the street without a permit will be subject to citation.
Analysis
Staff has documented a consistently high demand for on-street parking in the subject area that becomes progressively greater through the evening hours. The level of parking demand exceeds the minimum requirements under the policies of the NPPP. Upon receipt of any permit parking request, staff defines the limits and extent of the potential permit parking area (study area.) In certain cases, the study area is modified or expanded in order to pre-emptively mitigate the potential shift of parking demand onto adjacent streets with questionable parking capacity.
In this particular case, when establishing the study area, staff also evaluated parking demand on the adjoining streets of Hart Street and Barkley Avenue. The results of the evaluation indicated that parking demand on these streets does not appear high enough to meet parking occupancy thresholds, even if all ten vehicles displaced from Collins Avenue were to move into the adjoining neighborhood. In addition, any displacement of vehicles is likely to distribute among various streets in a manner that would minimize impacts to any one location. Therefore, proposed permit parking area is confined to the originally requested limits described above and similar in size to several previously approved permit parking areas within the city.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Traffic Commission approve the implementation of a Neighborhood Parking Permit Program on the south side of Collins Avenue from Hart Street to 2842 E. Collins Avenue.
The proponent and all residents within potential impact areas of this neighborhood were notified of this item on Traffic Commission Meeting agenda.
City of Orange Printed on 3/31/2022Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
804
Item #: 4.1. 2/9/2022 File #: 22-0079
7. ATTACHMENTS
· Letter of Request and Receipt for Application Fee
· Notification Letter and Receipt for Remaining Application Fee · Area Map
City of Orange Printed on 3/31/2022Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
805
806
807
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 10.1. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0142
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Rob Houston, City Manager
FROM: Susan Galvan, Interim Community Development Director
1. SUBJECT
Public Hearing to consider conduit bond financing for the Villa St. Joseph Apartments Project.
2. SUMMARY
Mercy Housing California 107, L.P., plans to develop the Villa St. Joseph Apartments, a 50-unit affordable housing project to be located at 480 S. Batavia Street. Proposed financing includes bond proceeds from multifamily housing revenue bonds issued by the California Municipal Finance Authority. The City is required to conduct a public hearing for the requested bond issuance to comply with state and federal law. The City would have no obligation, liability or responsibility for the project or the repayment of the bonds.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Resolution No. 11382. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange approving the issuance of revenue bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $20,000,000 to finance a multifamily rental housing facility for the benefit of Mercy Housing California 107, L.P., or an affiliate thereof, and certain other matters relating thereto.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 3: Enhance and promote quality of life in the community c: Support and enhance attractive, diverse living environments.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
Mercy Housing California, a California nonprofit corporation (the “Sponsor”),on behalf of Mercy Housing California 107, L.P., a California limited partnership, or another entity (such limited partnership or other entity, the “Borrower”)to be created by the Sponsor or by an affiliate of the Sponsor, has requested that California Municipal Finance Authority (CMFA) serve as the municipal issuer of one or more series of tax-exempt revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $20,000,000 (the “Bonds”). The proceeds of the Bonds would be used for the purpose of making a loan to the Borrower to finance the acquisition, construction, renovation, improvement and equipping of a 50-unit multifamily rental housing facility for very-low income seniors (the “Project”),to City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
808
Item #: 10.1. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0142
be owned and operated by the Borrower and located at 480 S. Batavia Street.
In order for all or a portion of the bonds to qualify as tax-exempt bonds, the City of Orange is required to conduct a public hearing to comply with the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (“TEFRA”) and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The TEFRA Hearing provides members of the community an opportunity to speak in favor of or against the use of tax-exempt bonds for the financing of the Project. Prior to this TEFRA Hearing, a public hearing notice was published to provide the required public notice. Following the close of the TEFRA Hearing, an “applicableelected representative”of the governmental unit hosting the Project (i.e., the City Council) must provide its approval of the issuance of the Bonds for the financing of the Project.
The City is a member of CMFA, but would have no financial, legal or other obligation, liability or responsibility for the Project or the repayment of the Bonds. Staff is recommending that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution to authorize CMFA to issue the Bonds for the Project and satisfy the requirements of TEFRA, the Code, and California Government Code Section 6500.
The proposed entitlements and preliminary award of City funds for the Project are discussed under separate staff reports.
7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. 11382
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
809
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 10.1. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0142
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Rob Houston, City Manager
FROM: Susan Galvan, Interim Community Development Director
1. SUBJECT
Public Hearing to consider conduit bond financing for the Villa St. Joseph Apartments Project.
2. SUMMARY
Mercy Housing California 107, L.P., plans to develop the Villa St. Joseph Apartments, a 50-unit affordable housing project to be located at 480 S. Batavia Street. Proposed financing includes bond proceeds from multifamily housing revenue bonds issued by the California Municipal Finance Authority. The City is required to conduct a public hearing for the requested bond issuance to comply with state and federal law. The City would have no obligation, liability or responsibility for the project or the repayment of the bonds.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Resolution No. 11382. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange approving the issuance of revenue bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $20,000,000 to finance a multifamily rental housing facility for the benefit of Mercy Housing California 107, L.P., or an affiliate thereof, and certain other matters relating thereto.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 3: Enhance and promote quality of life in the community c: Support and enhance attractive, diverse living environments.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
Mercy Housing California, a California nonprofit corporation (the “Sponsor”),on behalf of Mercy Housing California 107, L.P., a California limited partnership, or another entity (such limited partnership or other entity, the “Borrower”)to be created by the Sponsor or by an affiliate of the Sponsor, has requested that California Municipal Finance Authority (CMFA) serve as the municipal issuer of one or more series of tax-exempt revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $20,000,000 (the “Bonds”). The proceeds of the Bonds would be used for the purpose of making a loan to the Borrower to finance the acquisition, construction, renovation, improvement and equipping of a 50-unit multifamily rental housing facility for very-low income seniors (the “Project”),to City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
810
Item #: 10.1. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0142
be owned and operated by the Borrower and located at 480 S. Batavia Street.
In order for all or a portion of the bonds to qualify as tax-exempt bonds, the City of Orange is required to conduct a public hearing to comply with the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (“TEFRA”) and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The TEFRA Hearing provides members of the community an opportunity to speak in favor of or against the use of tax-exempt bonds for the financing of the Project. Prior to this TEFRA Hearing, a public hearing notice was published to provide the required public notice. Following the close of the TEFRA Hearing, an “applicableelected representative”of the governmental unit hosting the Project (i.e., the City Council) must provide its approval of the issuance of the Bonds for the financing of the Project.
The City is a member of CMFA, but would have no financial, legal or other obligation, liability or responsibility for the Project or the repayment of the Bonds. Staff is recommending that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution to authorize CMFA to issue the Bonds for the Project and satisfy the requirements of TEFRA, the Code, and California Government Code Section 6500.
The proposed entitlements and preliminary award of City funds for the Project are discussed under separate staff reports.
7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. 11382
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
811
RESOLUTION NO. 11382
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ORANGE APPROVING THE
ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS BY THE
CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE
AUTHORITY IN AN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $ 20,000,000 TO
FINANCE A MULTIFAMILY RENTAL
HOUSING FACILITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF
MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA 107, L.P., OR
AN AFFIILIATE THEREOF , AND CERTAIN
OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO
WHEREAS, Mercy Housin g California, a California nonprofit corporation ( the “Sponsor”), on behalf of Mercy Housing California 107, L.P., a California limited partnership, or another entity (such limited partnership or other entity, the “Borrower”) to be created by the Sponsor or by an affiliate of the Sponsor , has requested that the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “Authority”) issue one or more series of revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 20,000,000 (the “Bonds ”), including but not limited to revenue bonds issued as part of a plan to finance the acquisition, construction, renovation, improvement and equipping of a 50 -unit multifamily rental housing facility for very -low income seniors (the “Project”), to be owned and operated by the Borrower and located in the City of Orange, California (the “City”), at 480 S. Batavia Street; and
WHEREAS, an “applicable elected representative” of the jurisdiction in which the Project is to be located is required to approve the issuance of the Bonds under Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City (the “City Council”) is the elected legislative body of the City and is an “applicable elected representative” for purposes of Section 147(f) of the Code; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has requested that the City Council approve the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority in order to satisfy the public approval requirement of Section 147(f) of the Code and the requirements of Section 4 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Relating to the California Municipal Finance A uthority, dated as of January 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”), among certain local agencies, including the City; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code, the City Council has, following notice duly given, held a public hearing regarding the issuance of the Bonds, and now desires to approve the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED , by the City Council of the City of Orange, as follows:
Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. 812
2 Section 2. The City Council hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority, including but not limited to Bonds issued as part of a plan to finance the facilities described herein.
It is the purpose and intent of the City Council that this Resolution constitute ap proval of the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the Project, for the purposes of (i) Section 147(f) of the Code by the applicable elected representative of a governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which the Project is to be located , in accordance with said Section 147(f) and ( ii) Section 4 of the Agreement.
Section 3. The issuance of the Bonds shall be subject to the approval of the Authority of all financing documents relating thereto to which the Authority is a party. The City shall have no responsibility or liability whatsoever with respect to the Bonds.
Section 4. The adoption of this Resolution shall not obligate the City or any department thereof to (i) provide any financing to acquire or construct the Project or any refin ancing of the Project; (ii) approve any application or request for or take any other action in connection with any planning approval, permit or other action necessary for the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, installation or operation of the Proje ct; (iii) make any contribution or advance any funds whatsoever to the Authority; or (iv) take any further action with respect to the Authority or its membership therein.
Section 5. The officers of the City, including the City Manager, are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all documents which they deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect to and comply with the terms and intent of this Resolution and the financing transaction approved hereby.
Section 6. The City Clerk shall forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the Authority in care of its counsel:
Ronald E. Lee, Esq.
Jones Hall, APLC
475 Sansome Street, Suite 1700
San Francisco, CA 94111
Section 7. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
ADOPTED this ____ day of _____________________, 2022
_______________________________________
Mark A. Murphy, Mayor, City of Orange
ATTEST:
________________________________________
Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
813
3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF ORANGE )
I, PAMELA COLEMAN, City Clerk of the City of Orange, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Orange at a regular meeting thereof held on the ____ day of _____ ________________, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
________________________________________
Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
814
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 10.2. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0170
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rob Houston, City Manager
1. SUBJECT
Public Hearing to consider approval of a Disposition and Development Agreement with Katella Terrace, L.P. for the Katella Terrace senior affordable housing project. Resolution No. 11386.
2. SUMMARY
Disposition and Development Agreement to lease the property at 1249 E. Katella Avenue to Katella Terrace, L.P. for the development of 74 units of affordable senior housing.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Resolution No. 11386. A Resolution of the City Council of The City of Orange, (1) Approving the Disposition and Development Agreement by and between the City of Orange and Katella Terrace, L.P. and its attachments, establishing the terms and conditions for the Ground Lease of certain property located at 1249 E. Katella Avenue, Orange, California and the development of an affordable residential rental project for senior lower income households on said property; (2) Approving the Ground Lease of said property to a limited partnership entity for such project; and (3) Approving other related actions.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City as the land will be leased at its appraised fair market value.
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 3: Enhance and promote quality of life in the community c: Support and enhance attractive, diverse living environments.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
For over four decades, the Orange City Council has consistently supported the development of quality affordable housing, helping to develop 1,671 units of affordable housing since 1985. In 1981, the City and the YMCA collaborated to create the nonprofit Orange Senior Housing, Inc. (OSH) for the purpose of developing senior affordable housing on a 3.5-acre site adjacent to Hart Park. In 1986, OSH opened Triangle Terrace, a community of 75 senior apartment homes in which every tenant is provided a HUD Section 8 Voucher, pursuant to a contract between OSH and HUD.
In July 2016, the City Council approved a new ground lease to permit a development partnership including OSH to obtain tax credit financing to renovate Triangle Terrace. Concurrently, the City Council approved an Agreement that allowed OSH to extract cash from the refinancing that would be restricted to investment in senior affordable housing in the City. In November 2016, the refinancing of Triangle Terrace was completed, and the Restricted Amount for investment was determined to be City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
815
Item #: 10.2. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0170
Triangle Terrace was completed, and the Restricted Amount for investment was determined to be $8,041,349. During 2017-2018, OSH made offers on several sites within the City limits, and reviewed counteroffers with City staff. A consensus was developed to pursue the 1.5-acre site at 1249 E.
Katella Avenue, where a recent change to the City’s zoning ordinance provided for high density senior housing on property with Commercial zoning. Using portions of the Restricted Funds, OSH paid the costs of escrow, due diligence, project design, and entitlement until the plans for Katella Terrace were approved by the City Council in September 2019. The project will create 74 new housing units, 73 affordable units that will be restricted to Lower Income seniors, and one manager unit. In October 2019, a wholly-owned affiliate of OSH purchased the 1.5-acre property.
When a neighboring commercial property owner challenged the entitlement under the California Environmental Quality Act, the City and OSH retained joint counsel to defend the entitlement. The litigation was settled, without change to the project’s design, by an agreement to notify the neighboring property owner whenever the construction of the project might affect traffic on the adjacent street and public alley. During 2020, OSH used portions of the Restricted Funds to demolish a two-story office building and surface parking on the site. OSH continues to use Restricted Funds to maintain the vacant property.
Agreement to Convey Land
On February 8, 2022, the City Council approved an Agreement to Convey Land that would transfer ownership of the property at 1249 E. Katella Avenue to the City of Orange. The transfer of land will only occur after receiving approval from the California Department of Housing and Community Development that this transfer is exempt surplus land as defined by Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(A) and Section 37364. In consideration for the land, the City waived the approximately $90,000 in legal fees that it is owed by OSH Katella Terrace, LLC for the joint representation in the litigation involving the project entitlement. In addition to waiving legal fees, the City agreed to negotiate exclusively with Katella Terrace, LP (Developer) for the proposed Development and Disposition Agreement (DDA).
Project Financing
Affordable housing projects require extensive subsidies to ensure they can remain affordable and financially viable over several decades. This typically requires that they receive funding from multiple sources including federal tax credits, which are block granted to the state and awarded on a competitive basis. While this project was delayed by litigation, the state revised its criteria for scoring tax credit projects to award additional points for projects with municipal land ownership. The Agreement to Convey Land makes the project more competitive for federal tax credits by transferring ownership of the land to the City. The proposed DDA will allow Katella Terrace, L.P. to seek additional sources of funding for the project.
Disposition and Development Agreement
The proposed DDA would provide for the City to lease the property to Katella Terrace, LP for the development of 74 senior affordable units. The ground lease will have the following terms:
· A term of 60 years
· Rent will include the fully capitalized rent which is equal to the appraised fair market value of the property, plus an annual $5,000 administration fee
· The entire amount of the capitalized rent will be prepaid by the tenant using proceeds from the City Ground Rent Loan
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
816
Item #: 10.2. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0170
· The City Ground Rent Loan is a residual receipts loan with 3% simple interest and a sixty-year term
The proposed Resolution and DDA will be considered after a public hearing. The notice of the public hearing was published once a week for two weeks per legal requirements, and the summary report and proposed DDA have been available for public inspection for two weeks.
Recommendation
Staff recommends the approval of Resolution No. 11386 for the development of the Katella Terrace senior affordable housing project.
7. ATTACHMENTS
· Disposition and Development Agreement by and between City of Orange and Katella Terrace, LP
· Resolution No. 11386
· Summary Report
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
817
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 10.2. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0170
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rob Houston, City Manager
1. SUBJECT
Public hearing to consider approval of a Disposition and Development Agreement with Katella Terrace, L.P. for the Katella Terrace senior affordable housing project. Resolution No. 11386.
2. SUMMARY
Disposition and Development Agreement to lease the property at 1249 E. Katella Avenue to Katella Terrace, L.P. for the development of 74 units of affordable senior housing.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Resolution No. 11386. A Resolution of the City Council of The City of Orange, (1) Approving the Disposition and Development Agreement by and between the City of Orange and Katella Terrace, L.P. and its attachments, establishing the terms and conditions for the Ground Lease of certain property located at 1249 E. Katella Avenue, Orange, California and the development of an affordable residential rental project for senior lower income households on said property; (2) Approving the Ground Lease of said property to a limited partnership entity for such project; and (3) Approving other related actions.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City as the land will be leased at its appraised fair market value.
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 3: Enhance and promote quality of life in the community c: Support and enhance attractive, diverse living environments.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
For over four decades, the Orange City Council has consistently supported the development of quality affordable housing, helping to develop 1,671 units of affordable housing since 1985. In 1981, the City and the YMCA collaborated to create the nonprofit Orange Senior Housing, Inc. (OSH) for the purpose of developing senior affordable housing on a 3.5-acre site adjacent to Hart Park. In 1986, OSH opened Triangle Terrace, a community of 75 senior apartment homes in which every tenant is provided a HUD Section 8 Voucher, pursuant to a contract between OSH and HUD.
In July 2016, the City Council approved a new ground lease to permit a development partnership including OSH to obtain tax credit financing to renovate Triangle Terrace. Concurrently, the City Council approved an Agreement that allowed OSH to extract cash from the refinancing that would be restricted to investment in senior affordable housing in the City. In November 2016, the refinancing of Triangle Terrace was completed, and the Restricted Amount for investment was determined to be City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
818
Item #: 10.2. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0170
Triangle Terrace was completed, and the Restricted Amount for investment was determined to be $8,041,349. During 2017-2018, OSH made offers on several sites within the City limits, and reviewed counteroffers with City staff. A consensus was developed to pursue the 1.5-acre site at 1249 E.
Katella Avenue, where a recent change to the City’s zoning ordinance provided for high density senior housing on property with Commercial zoning. Using portions of the Restricted Funds, OSH paid the costs of escrow, due diligence, project design, and entitlement until the plans for Katella Terrace were approved by the City Council in September 2019. The project will create 74 new housing units, 73 affordable units that will be restricted to Lower Income seniors, and one manager unit. In October 2019, a wholly-owned affiliate of OSH purchased the 1.5-acre property.
When a neighboring commercial property owner challenged the entitlement under the California Environmental Quality Act, the City and OSH retained joint counsel to defend the entitlement. The litigation was settled, without change to the project’s design, by an agreement to notify the neighboring property owner whenever the construction of the project might affect traffic on the adjacent street and public alley. During 2020, OSH used portions of the Restricted Funds to demolish a two-story office building and surface parking on the site. OSH continues to use Restricted Funds to maintain the vacant property.
Agreement to Convey Land
On February 8, 2022, the City Council approved an Agreement to Convey Land that would transfer ownership of the property at 1249 E. Katella Avenue to the City of Orange. The transfer of land will only occur after receiving approval from the California Department of Housing and Community Development that this transfer is exempt surplus land as defined by Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(A) and Section 37364. In consideration for the land, the City waived the approximately $90,000 in legal fees that it is owed by OSH Katella Terrace, LLC for the joint representation in the litigation involving the project entitlement. In addition to waiving legal fees, the City agreed to negotiate exclusively with Katella Terrace, LP (Developer) for the proposed Development and Disposition Agreement (DDA).
Project Financing
Affordable housing projects require extensive subsidies to ensure they can remain affordable and financially viable over several decades. This typically requires that they receive funding from multiple sources including federal tax credits, which are block granted to the state and awarded on a competitive basis. While this project was delayed by litigation, the state revised its criteria for scoring tax credit projects to award additional points for projects with municipal land ownership. The Agreement to Convey Land makes the project more competitive for federal tax credits by transferring ownership of the land to the City. The proposed DDA will allow Katella Terrace, L.P. to seek additional sources of funding for the project.
Disposition and Development Agreement
The proposed DDA would provide for the City to lease the property to Katella Terrace, LP for the development of 74 senior affordable units. The ground lease will have the following terms:
· A term of 60 years
· Rent will include the fully capitalized rent which is equal to the appraised fair market value of the property, plus an annual $5,000 administration fee
· The entire amount of the capitalized rent will be prepaid by the tenant using proceeds from the City Ground Rent Loan
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
819
Item #: 10.2. 4/12/2022 File #: 22-0170
· The City Ground Rent Loan is a residual receipts loan with 3% simple interest and a sixty-year term
The proposed Resolution and DDA will be considered after a public hearing. The notice of the public hearing was published once a week for two weeks per legal requirements, and the summary report and proposed DDA have been available for public inspection for two weeks.
Recommendation
Staff recommends the approval of Resolution No. 11386 for the development of the Katella Terrace senior affordable housing project.
7. ATTACHMENTS
· Disposition and Development Agreement by and between City of Orange and Katella Terrace, LP
· Resolution No. 11386
· Summary Report
City of Orange Printed on 4/7/2022Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
820
DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
(Katella Terrace Apartments
1249 E. Katella Avenue)
by and between
THE CITY OF ORANGE,
City,
and
KATELLA TERRACE, L.P.,
Developer
821
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Article I. SUBJECT OF AGREEMENT ................................................................................ 1 Section 1.01 Purpose of the Agreement ........................................................................... 1 Section 1.02 Definitions................................................................................................... 1 Section 1.03 The Property................................................................................................ 9 Section 1.04 City ............................................................................................................ 10 Section 1.05 Developer .................................................................................................. 10 Section 1.06 Assignments and Transfers ....................................................................... 10 Article II. lease of property to developer ............................................................................... 11 Section 2.01 Condition of the Property.......................................................................... 11 Section 2.02 Form of Ground Lease; Term ................................................................... 12 Article III. financing ............................................................................................................... 12 Section 3.01 Method of Financing ................................................................................. 12 Section 3.02 City Assistance.......................................................................................... 12 Section 3.03 Evidence of Financing .............................................................................. 13 Article IV. development of the property ................................................................................. 14 Section 4.01 Land Use Approvals ................................................................................. 14 Section 4.02 Hazardous Materials ................................................................................. 14 Section 4.03 Scope of Development .............................................................................. 15 Section 4.04 Construction Drawings and Related Documents ...................................... 15 Section 4.05 City Approval of Plans, Drawings and Related Documents ..................... 15 Section 4.06 Cost of Construction ................................................................................. 16 Section 4.07 Schedule of Performance .......................................................................... 16 Section 4.08 Local, State and Federal Laws .................................................................. 17 Section 4.09 Nondiscrimination During Construction................................................... 17 Section 4.10 Indemnification and Insurance .................................................................. 18 Section 4.11 Disclaimer of City Responsibility ............................................................. 21 Section 4.12 Permits ...................................................................................................... 22 Section 4.13 Rights of Access ....................................................................................... 22 Section 4.14 Taxes, Assessments, Encumbrances and Liens ........................................ 22 Section 4.15 Rights to Plans .......................................................................................... 22 Section 4.16 Release of Construction Covenants .......................................................... 23 Article V. use of the property ................................................................................................ 24 Section 5.01 Use As Affordable Housing ...................................................................... 24 Section 5.02 Management Plan; Annual Project Budget; Quarterly Report ................. 25 Section 5.03 Property Maintenance ............................................................................... 26 Section 5.04 Obligation to Refrain from Discrimination............................................... 27 Section 5.05 Effect and Duration of Covenants ............................................................. 28 822
ii
Section 5.06 Enforcement of Covenants ........................................................................ 28 Section 5.07 Monitoring ................................................................................................ 29 Section 5.08 Regulatory Agreement .............................................................................. 29 Article VI. defaults and remedies ............................................................................................ 29 Section 6.01 Defaults - General ..................................................................................... 29 Section 6.02 Institution of Legal Actions ...................................................................... 30 Section 6.03 Applicable Law ......................................................................................... 31 Section 6.04 Acceptance of Service of Process ............................................................. 31 Section 6.05 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative ....................................................... 31 Section 6.06 Damages .................................................................................................... 31 Section 6.07 Specific Performance ................................................................................ 31 Section 6.08 Termination by Either Party...................................................................... 31 Section 6.09 Termination by Developer ........................................................................ 32 Section 6.10 Termination by City .................................................................................. 32 Article VII. general provisions ................................................................................................. 33 Section 7.01 Notices ...................................................................................................... 33 Section 7.02 Conflicts of Interest................................................................................... 33 Section 7.03 Nonliability of City Officials and Employees .......................................... 34 Section 7.04 Force Majeure ........................................................................................... 34 Section 7.05 Inspection of Books and Records ............................................................. 34 Section 7.06 Approvals .................................................................................................. 34 Section 7.07 Real Estate Commissions .......................................................................... 35 Section 7.08 No Third Party Beneficiaries .................................................................... 35 Section 7.09 Authority to Sign....................................................................................... 35 Section 7.10 No Partnership .......................................................................................... 35 Section 7.11 Compliance with Law ............................................................................... 35 Section 7.12 Binding Effect ........................................................................................... 35 Section 7.13 Incorporation by Reference....................................................................... 35 Section 7.14 Counterparts .............................................................................................. 36 Section 7.15 Construction and Interpretation of Agreement ......................................... 36 Section 7.16 Entire Agreement, Waivers and Amendments .......................................... 36 Section 7.17 Time for Acceptance of Agreement by City ............................................. 37 823
iii
ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - SITE MAP
ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ATTACHMENT NO. 3 - METHOD OF FINANCING
ATTACHMENT NO. 4 - SCOPE OF DEVELOPMENT
ATTACHMENT NO. 5 - SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
ATTACHMENT NO. 6 - [INTENTIONALLY DELETED]
ATTACHMENT NO. 7 - GROUND LEASE
ATTACHMENT NO. 8 - MEMORANDUM OF LEASE
ATTACHMENT NO. 9 - [INTENTIONALLY DELETED]
ATTACHMENT NO. 10 - REGULATORY AGREEMENT
ATTACHMENT NO. 11 - CITY GROUND RENT LOAN NOTE
ATTACHMENT NO. 12 - CITY GROUND RENT LOAN DEED OF TRUST ATTACHMENT NO. 13 - [INTENTIONALLY DELETED]
ATTACHMENT NO. 14 - ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENTS
ATTACHMENT NO. 15 - ENVIRONMENTAL INDEMNITY
824
1249 E. Katella Avenue – Katella Terrace
Disposition and Development Agreement