PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
[Engineering Design & Environmental Services]
THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made at Orange, California, on thi s _____ day of ____________, 20 22 (the “Effective Date”) by and between the CITY OF ORANGE, a municipal corporation (“City”), and MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC., a California corporation (“Contractor”), who agree as follows:
1. Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Contractor shall provide to the reasonable satisfaction of City the services set forth in Exhibit “A,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. As a material inducement to City to enter into this Agreement, Contractor represents and warrants that it has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services and fully understand s the difficulties and restrictions in performing the work. The services which are the subject of this Agreement are not in the usual course of City’s business and City relies on Contractor’s representation that it is independently engaged in the busi ness of providing such services and is experienced in performing the work.
Contractor shall perform all services in a manner reasonably satisfactory to City and in a manner in conformance with the standards of quality normally observed by an entity provid ing such services to a municipal agency. All services provided shall conform to all federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations and to the best professional standards and practices. The terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement shall control over any terms and conditions in Exhibit "A" to the contrary.
Kevin Yamakawa, Associate Civil Engineer (“City’s Project Manager”), shall be the person to whom Contractor will report for the performance of services hereunder. It is understood that Contractor’s performance hereunder shall be under the supervision of City’s Project Manager (or designee), that Contractor shall coordinate its services hereunder with City’s Project Manager to the extent required by City’s Project Manager, and that all performances required hereunder by Contractor shall be performed to the satisfaction of City’s Project Manager and the City Manager.
2. Compensation and Fees.
a. Contractor's total compensation for all services performed under this Agreement, shall not exceed SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY-TWO THOUSAND NINETY-THREE DOLLARS and 00/100 ($762,093.00) without the prior written authorization of City.
b. The above compensation shall include all costs, including, but not limited to, all clerical, administrative, overhe ad, insurance, reproduction, telephone, travel, auto rental, subsistence and all related expenses.
3. Payment.
a. As scheduled services are completed, Contractor shall submit to City an invoice for the services completed, authorized expenses and autho rized extra work actually performed or incurred.
2 b. All such invoices shall state the basis for the amount invoiced, including services completed, the number of hours spent and any extra work performed.
c. City will pay Contractor the amount invoiced within thirty (30) days after the approval of the invoice.
d. Payment shall constitute payment in full for all services, authorized costs and authorized extra work covered by that invoice.
4. Change Orders. No payment for extra s ervices caused by a change in the scope or complexity of work, or for any other reason, shall be made unless and until such extra services and a price therefor have been previously authorized in writing and approved by City as an amendment to this Agreement. City’s Project Manager is authorized to approve a reduction in the services to be performed and compensation therefor. All amendments shall set forth the changes of work, extension of time, and/or adjustment of the compensation to be paid by City to Contractor and shall be signed by the City’s Project Manager, City Manager or City Council, as applicable.
5. Licenses. Contractor represents that it and any subcontractors it may engage, possess any and all licenses which are required under state or fed eral law to perform the work contemplated by this Agreement and that Contractor and its subcontractors shall maintain all appropriate licenses, including a City of Orange business license, at its cost, during the performance of this Agreement.
6. Independent Contractor . At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall be an independent contractor and not an employee of City. City shall have the right to control Contractor only insofar as the result of Contractor's services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. City shall not have the right to control the means by which Contractor accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities, materials and equipment which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor shall be solely responsible for, and shall indemnify, defend and save City harmless from all matters relating to the payment of its subcontractors, agents and employees, including compliance with social security withholding and all other wages, salaries, benefits, taxes, exactions, and regulations of any nature whatsoever.
Contractor acknowledges that it and any subcontractors, agents or employees employed by Contractor shall not, under any circumstances, be considered employees of City, and that they shall not be entitled to any of the benefits or rights afforded employees of City, including, but not limited to, sick leave, vacation leave, holiday pay, Public Employees Retirement System benefits, or health, life, dental, long-term disability or workers' compensation insurance benefits.
7. Contractor Not Agent. Except as City may specify in writing, Contractor shall have no authority, express or implied, to a ct on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. Contractor shall have no authority, express or implied, to bind City to any obligation whatsoever.
8. Designated Persons. Only those qualified persons authorized by City’s Project Manager, or as designated in Exhibit “A,” shall perform work provided for under this Agreement. 3 It is understood by the parties that clerical and other nonprofessional work may be performed by persons other than those designated.
9. Assignment or Subcontracting. No assignment or subcontracting by Contractor of any part of this Agreement or of funds to be received under this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless the assignment has the prior written approval of City. City may terminate this Agreement rather than accept any proposed assignment or subcontracting. Such assignment or subcontracting may be approved by the City Manager or his/her designee.
10. Time of Completion . Except as otherwise specified in Exhibit “A,” Contractor shall commence the wor k provided for in this Agreement within ten (10) days of the Effective Date of this Agreement and diligently prosecute completion of the work in accordance with the time period set forth in Exhibit “A” hereto or as otherwise agreed to by and between the representatives of the parties.
11. Time Is of the Essence. Time is of the essence in this Agreement. Contractor shall do all things necessary and incidental to the prosecution of Contractor's work.
12. Reserved.
13. Delays and Extensions of Time. Contractor's sole remedy for delays outside its control, other than those delays caused by City, shall be an extension of time. No matter what the cause of the delay, Contractor must document any delay and request an extension of time in writing at the time of the delay to the satisfaction of City. Any extensions granted shall be limited to the length of the delay outside Contractor’s control. If Contractor believes that delays caused by City will cause it to incur additional costs, it must specif y, in writing, why the delay has caused additional costs to be incurred and the exact amount of such cost at the time the delay occurs. No additional costs can be paid that exceed the not to exceed amount stated in Section 2.a, above, absent a written amendment to this Agreement.
14. Products of Contractor. The documents, studies, evaluations, asses sments, reports, plans, citations, materials, manuals, technical data, logs, files, designs and other products produced or provided by Contractor for this Agreement shall become the property of City upon receipt. Contractor shall deliver all such products to City prior to payment for same. City may use, reuse or otherwise utilize such products without restriction.
15. Equal Employment Opportunity . During the performance of this Agreement, Contractor agrees as follows:
a. Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, mental or physical disability, or any other basis prohibited by applicable law. Contractor shall ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, national origin, mental or physical disability, or any other basis prohibited by applicable law.
Such actions shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms 4 of compensation and selection for training, including apprenticeship. Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, a notice setting forth provisions of this non-discrimination clause.
b. Contractor shall, in all solicitations and advertisements for employees placed by, or on behalf of Contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, mental or physical disability, or any other basis prohibited by applicable law.
c. Contractor shall cause the foregoing paragraphs (a) and (b) to be inserted in all subcontracts for any work covered by this A greement, provided that the foregoing provisions shall not apply to subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials.
16. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor agrees that it shall not make, participate in the making, or in any way attempt to use its position as a consultant to influence any decision of City in which Contractor knows or has reason to know that Contractor, its officers, partners, or employees have a financial interest as defined in Section 87103 of the Government Code.
17. Indemnity.
a. To the fullest extent permitted by law , Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and hold City, its City Council and each member thereof, and the officers, officials, agents and employees of City (collectively the “Indemnitees”) entirely harmless from all liability arising out of:
(1) Any and all claims under workers’ compensation acts and other employee benefit acts with respect to Contractor’s employees or Contractor’s subcontractor’s employees arising out of Contractor’s work under this Agreeme nt, including any and all claims under any law pertaining to Contractor or its employees’ status as an independent contractor and any and all claims under Labor Code section 1720 related to the payment of prevailing wages for public works projects; and
(2) Any claim, loss, injury to or death of persons or damage to property caused by any act, neglect, default, or omission other than a professional act or omission of Contractor, or person, firm or corporation employed by Contractor, either directly or by independent contract, including all damages due to loss or theft sustained by any person, firm or corporation including the Indemnitees, or any of them, arising out of, or in any way connected with the work or services which are the subject of this Agreement, including injury or damage either on or off City’s property; but not for any loss, injury, death or damage caused by the active negligence or willful misconduct of City. Contractor, at its own expense, cost and risk, shall indemnify any and all claims, actions, suits or other proceedings that may be brought or instituted against the Indemnitees on any such claim or liability covered by this subparagraph, and shall pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Indemnitees, or any of them, in any action, suit or other proceedings as a result of coverage under this subparagraph.
5 b. To the fullest extent permitted by law, and as limited by California Civil Code 2782.8, Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold Indemnitees harmless from all liabili ty arising out of any claim, loss, injury to or death of persons or damage to property to the extent caused by its negligent professional act or omission in the performance of professional services pursuant to this Agreement.
c. Except for the Indemnite es, the indemnifications provided in this Agreement shall not be construed to extend any third party indemnification rights of any kind to any person or entity which is not a signatory to this Agreement.
d. The indemniti es set forth in this section shall survive any closing, rescission, or termination of this Agreement, and shall continue to be binding and in full force and effect in perpetuity with respect to Contractor and its successors.
18. Insurance.
a. Contractor shall carry workers ’ compensation insurance as required by law for the protection of its employees during the progress of the work. Contractor understands that it is an independent contractor and not entitled to any worker s’ compensation benefits unde r any City program.
b. Contractor shall maintain during the life of this Agreement the following minimum amount of comprehensive general liability insurance or commercial general liability insurance: the greater of (1) One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence ; or (2) all the insurance coverage and/or limits carried by or available to Contractor. Said insurance shall cover bodily injury, death and property damage and be written on an occurrence basis.
c. Contractor shall maintain during the life of this Agreement, the following minimum amount of automotive liability insurance: the greater of (1) a combined single limit of One Million Dollars ($ 1,000,000); or (2) all the insurance coverage and/or limits carried by or available to Contractor. Said insurance shall cover bodily injury, death and property damage for all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles and be written on an occurrence basis.
d. Any insurance proceeds in excess of or broader than the minimum required coverage and/or minimum required limits which are applicable to a given loss shall be available to City. No representation is made that the minimum insurance requirements of this Agreement are sufficient to cover the obligations of Contractor under this Agreement.
e. Each policy of general liability and automotive liability shall provide that City, its officers, officials, agents, and employees are declared to be additional insureds under the terms of the policy, but only with respect to the w ork performed by Contractor under this Agreement. A policy endorsement to that effect shall be provided to City along with the certificate of insurance. In lieu of an endorsement, City will accept a copy of the policy(ies) which evidences that City is an additional insured as a contracting party. The minimum coverage required by Subsection 18.b and c, above, shall apply to City as an additional insured. Any umbrella liability 6 insurance that is provided as part of the general or automobile liability minimums set forth herein shall be maintained for the duration of the Agreement.
f. Contractor shall maintain during the life of this Agreement professional liability insurance covering errors and omissions arising out of the performance of this Agreement with a minimum limit of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim. Contractor agrees to keep such policy in force and effect for at least five (5) years from the date of completion of this Agreement.
g. The insurance policies maintained by Contractor shall be primary insurance and no insurance held or owned by City shall be called upon to cover any loss under the policy.
Contractor will determine its own needs in procurement of insurance to cover liabilities other than as stated above.
h. Before Contractor performs any work or prepares or delivers any materials, Contractor shall furnish certificates of insurance and endorsements, as required by City, evidencing the aforementioned minimum insurance coverages on forms acceptable to City, which shall provide that the insurance in force will not be canceled or allowed to lapse without at least ten (10) days’ prior written notice to City.
i. Except for professional liability insurance coverage that may be required by this Agreement, all insurance maintained by Contractor shall be issued by companies admitted to conduct the pertinent line of insurance business in California and having a rating of Grade A or better and Class VII or better by the latest editi on of Best Key Rating Guide. In the case of professional liability insurance coverage, such coverage shall be issued by companies either licensed or admitted to conduct business in California so long as such insurer pos sesses the aforementioned Best rating.
j Contractor shall immediately notify City if any required insurance lapses or is otherwise modified and cease performance of this Agreement unless otherwise directed by City.
In such a case, City may procure insurance or self-insure the risk and charge Contractor for such costs and any and all damages resulting therefrom, by way of set -off from any sums owed Contractor.
k. Contractor agrees that in the event of loss due to any of the perils for which it has agreed to provide insurance, Contractor shall look solely to its insurance for recovery.
Contractor hereby grants to City, on behalf of any insurer providing insurance to either Contractor or City with respect to the services of Contractor herein, a waiver of any right to subrogation which any such insurer may acquire against City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.
l. Contractor shall include all subcontractors, if any, as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor to City for review and approval. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.
7 19. Termination. City may for any reason terminate this Agreement by giving Contractor not less than five (5) days’ written notice of intent to terminate. Upon receipt of such notice, Contractor shall immediately cease work, unless the notice from City provides otherwise.
Upon the termination of this Agreement, City shall pay Contractor for services satisfactorily provided and all allowable reimbursements incurred to the date of termination in compliance with this Agreement, unless termination by City shall be for cause, in which event City may withhold any disputed compensation. City shall not be liable for any claim of lost profits.
20. Maintenance and Inspection of Records. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, Contractor and its subcontractors shall maintain reasonably full and complete books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other information (collectively, the “records”) pertaining to the costs of and completion of services performed under this Agreement.
City and its authorized representatives shall have access to and the right to audit and reproduce any of Contractor's records regarding the services provided under this Agreement. Contractor shall maintain all such records for a period of at least three (3) years after termination or completion of this Agreement. Contractor agrees to make available all such records for inspection or audit at its offices during normal business hours and upon three (3) days’ notice from City, and copies thereof shall be furnished if requested.
21. Compliance with all Laws/Immigration Laws.
a. Contractor shall be knowledgeable of and comply with all local, state and federal laws which may apply to the performance of this Agreement.
b. If the work provided for in this Agreement constitutes a “public works,” as that term is defined in Section 1720 of the California Labor Code, for which prevailing wages must be paid, to the extent Contractor’s employees will perform any work that falls within any of the classifications for which the Department of Labor Relations of the State of California promulgates prevailing wage determinations, Contractor hereby agrees that it, and any subcontractor under it, shall pay not less than the specified prevailing ra tes of wages to all such workers . The general prevailing wage determinations for c rafts can be located on the web site of the Department of Industrial Relations (www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR). Additionally, to perform work under this Contract, Contractor must meet all State registration requirements and criteria, including project compliance monitoring.
c. Contractor represents and warrants that it:
(1) Has complied and shall at all times during the term of this Agreement comply, in all respects, with all immigration laws, regulatio ns, statutes, rules, codes, and orders, including, without limitation, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA); and
(2) Has not and will not knowingly employ any individual to perform services under this Agreement who is ineligible to work in the United States or under the terms of this Agreement; and
8 (3) Has properly maintained, and shall at all times during the term of this Agreement properly maintain, all related employment documentation records including, without limitation, the comple tion and maintenance of the Form I -9 for each of Contractor’s employees; and
(4) Has responded, and shall at all times during the term of this Agreement respond, in a timely fashion to any government inspection requests relating to immigration law compliance and/or Form I -9 compliance and/or worksite enforcement by the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Labor, or the Social Security Administration.
d. Contractor shall require all subcontractors or subconsultants to make the same representations and warranties as set forth in Subsection 21.c.
e. Contractor shall, upon request of City, provide a list of all employees working under this Agreement and shall provide, to the reasonable satisfaction of City, verification that all such employees are eligible to work in the United States. All costs associated with such verification shall be borne by Contractor. Once such request has been made, Contractor may not change employees working under this Agreement without written notice to City, accompanied by the verification required herein for such employees.
f. Contractor shall require all subcontractors or sub-consultants to make the same verification as set forth in Subsection 21.e.
g. If Contractor or subcontractor knowingly employs an employee providing work under this Agreement who is not authorized to work in the United States, and/or fails to follow federal laws to determine the status of such employee, that shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and may be cause for immediate termination of this Agreement by City.
h. Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold City, its officers, officials, agents and employees harmless for, of and from any loss, including but not limited to fines, penalties and corrective measures City may sustain by reason of Contractor's failure to comply with sa id laws, rules and regulations in connection with the performance of this Agreement.
22. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California and Contractor agrees to submit to the jurisdiction of California courts. Venue for any dispute arising under this Agreement shall be in Orange County, California.
23. Integration. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties. No other agreement, oral or written, pertaining to the work to be performed under this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless it is in writing and signed by both parties. Any work performed which is inconsistent with or in violation of the provisions of this Agree ment shal l not be compensated.
9 24. Notice. Except as otherwise provided herein, all notices required under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered personally , by e -mail, or by first class U.S. mail, postage prepaid, to each party at the address listed b elow. Either party may change the notice address by notifying the other party in writing. Notices shall be deemed received upon receipt of same or within three (3) days of deposit in the U.S. Mail, whichever is earlier. Notices sent by e- mail shall be deemed received on the date of the e-mail transmission.
“CONTRACTOR” “CITY”
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. City of Orange
2833 Junction Avenue, Suite 100 300 E. Chapman Avenue San Jose, CA 95134 Orange, CA 92866-1591
Attn.: Julie Passalacqua Attn.: Kevin Yamakawa
Telephone: 916-712-2197 Telephone: 714-744-5553
E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected]
25. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Signatures transmitted via facsimile and electronic mail shall have the same effect as original signatures.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signatures on next page]
10 IN WITNESS of this Agreement, the parties have entered into this Agreement as of the year and day first above written.
“CONTRACTOR” “CITY”
MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC., CITY OF ORANGE, a municipal corporation a California corporation
*By: By:
Printed Name: Mark A. Murphy, Mayor
Title:
*By: ATTEST:
Printed Name:
Title:
Pamela Coleman, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mary E. Binning
Senior Assistant City Attorney
*NOTE: City requires the following signature(s) on behalf of the Contractor:
-- (1) the Chairman of the Board, the President or a Vice-President, AND (2) the Secretary, the Chief Financial Officer, the Treasurer, an Assistant Secretary or an Assistant Treasurer. If only one corporate officer exists or one corporate officer holds more than one corporate office, please so indicate. OR -- The corporate officer named in a corporate resolution as authorized to enter into this Agreement. A copy of the corporate resolution, certified by the Secretary close in time to the execution of the Agreement, must be provided to City.
EXHIBIT “A”
SCOPE OF SERVICES
[Beneath this sheet.]
Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
1 OF 20
SCOPE OF SERVICES
TASK 1. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
Task 1.1. Project Management
Mark Thomas will coordinate with the City and manage the project team. This includes preparing contract paperwork, memos, letters, and emails, and making phone calls. Management activities also including preparing monthly invoices and status reports, which will include summation of work by task, progress relative to adopted project schedule, projected work activities, and outstanding issues. Mark Thomas will adhere to the project budget, and will actively manage sub-consultant budget requirements. The project is anticipated to last 14 months from Notice to Proceed to construction advertisement.
Task 1.2. Project Meetings
Mark Thomas will organize, schedule, and lead project meetings as needed. This includes preparing meeting agendas and meeting minutes summarizing discussion items and action items. It is assumed there will be 12 meeting held via conference call and 2 in person meetings Task 1.3. Project Schedule
Mark Thomas will develop and maintain a critical path method (CPM) design schedule for the environmental, permitting, hydraulic, geotechnical and bridge design phases of the project. The schedule will be updated as progress is made, with critical path activities clearly shown for team review purposes. The project schedule tasks will align with the tasks included within the Scope of Services.
Task 1.4. Quality Control
Mark Thomas will prepare and implement our established Quality Assurance (QA) Procedures to verify that all deliverables have been reviewed for completeness and accuracy, that the submittals conform to the applicable standards, as well as to check that the deliverable satisfies the purpose and need for the submittal. We will complete and document an independent technical review of each major submittal. Review comments will be addressed prior to submittal to the City. Mark Thomas will review subconsultant submittals according to the same standards.
• Monthly Invoices and Progress Reports
• Meeting Agendas and Minutes
• Project Schedule
• Quality Control Documents
Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
2 OF 20
TASK 2. SURVEY
Task 2.1. Control Survey
Mark Thomas will perform a field survey to establish the control necessary for the project area. Project horizontal control (NAD83) and vertical control (NAVD88) will be established based upon GPS ties to the CSRC network, California Coordinate System 1983 (CCS83), Zone VI, Epoch 2017.5 for horizontal and vertical. Additional local benchmarks from the Orange County Geodetic Control will also be verified, for elevation control and confirmation. Mark Thomas will include control points in the Electronic Base Map which will include coordinates and elevations used for each point.
Task 2.2. Boundary Survey
Mark Thomas will perform record research of existing Record of Surveys, Subdivision and Parcel Maps, and Corner Records, to verify existing centerlines together with the necessary field survey ties to locate sufficient monuments to verify the alignment and right-of-way of Cannon Street. Mark Thomas will obtain and review Preliminary Title Reports (PTR), as well as review supporting documents provided by the City, for use in determining property lines and easements that may impact acquisition for the six (6) parcels identified in Task 6.1 Plats and Legal Descriptions. An ODC among of $500 per PTR has been budgeted. It is assumed that sufficient monumentation will be in place and no material discrepancies between record monuments and field monuments will be found.
Additional survey work required to satisfy Monument Preservation is not included in this scope.
Task 2.3. Field Survey
Mark Thomas survey crews use Trimble Data Collectors TSC 5 and TSC 7 with current versions of Trimble Access for field data collection. Survey field data is processed in Trimble Business Center and Trible Real Works. If City provides current symbol library and layering standards for CAD, Mark Thomas will use them for the Topographic Survey Mapping file, which will be delivered in Autodesk Civil 3D format.
Mark Thomas will perform field survey to collect topographic data within the project limits intended to serve as the basis for design work throughout the project. Stational Terrestrial Lidar Scans (STLS) will be conducted to collect features across the right of way of Cannon Street between Santiago Canyon Road and Serrano Avenue, limited to face of wall where it exists. Data extracted from the STLS will be used to develop a topographic survey which will include surface visible improvements in the right of way, including locations of walls (grade shot at bottom face). Features to be captured include, but are not limited to sidewalks, curb and gutter, driveways cuts, curb ramps, fences, walls, surface visible utility improvements, surface visible storm and sewer facilities, trees, street lighting, signing, striping, markings, grade breaks, top and toe of dirt areas. Within Cannon Street, trees will be surveyed. Structural elements will include pier walls, abutments, soffits, and any exposed footings.
Surface visible storm and sewer structures within the roadway will be dipped to determine invert elevations and pipe diameters. Field crews will rely on markings on utility lids to identify the utility. Underground utility detection and locating is excluded in this scope of work. Four (4) total Cross-sections up to 400’ long each will be taken along the channel at the faces of existing bridge and at approximately 100 feet upstream and 100 feet downstream of the bridge. At the cross section, trees over 6” diameter at breast height will be included in the cross section.
Right of way and property boundary lines as established will be shown on the topographic map with ties to sufficient survey monuments as field located and verified.
Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
3 OF 20
• Project Topographic Base Map derived from field data (AutoCAD Civil 3D 2019) • Survey Control Report – for horizontal and vertical control • Survey field notes and site photos
TASK 3. CEQA REQUIREMENTS
Task 3.1. Technical Studies
The following technical analyses, memoranda or reports are in support of the Initial Study (IS) and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). For the purposes of this scope, the study areas for the technical studies are assumed to cover the limits provided in the proposed project’s geometric exhibit provided in the RFP. Preparation of one draft and one final analyses/memorandum/report for each topic area below is specified.
Task 3.1.1. Cultural Resources Memorandum
An archaeological and historical records review and literature search at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System, located at California State University, Fullerton will be conducted. The SCCIC houses pertinent archaeological site and survey information necessary to determine if previously recorded cultural resources exist within 0.5 mile of the project area. All pertinent references will be reviewed and summarized in the cultural resources memorandum. The cost of the record search will include hourly initiation and a reimbursable SCCIC cost.
Native American consultation under Assembly Bill (AB) 52 is necessary for this project. It is the responsibility of the Lead Agency to conduct this consultation. Per the RFP, LSA will assist with consultation, which is described below. If the project qualifies as a Categorical Exemption, it will not be necessary for the Lead Agency to conduct Native American consultation.
A pedestrian field survey of the approximately 0.6-mile linear project area will be conducted in order to identify and document previously unrecorded resources on Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms, as well as to update existing DPR forms in accordance with guidelines established by the State of California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP).
The results of the cultural resource record and the Native American consultation will be documented in a negative cultural resource technical memorandum. This memorandum will discuss the potential for the project to impact cultural resources and, if needed, include avoidance measures and other recommendations to minimize these impacts. This proposal assumes negative findings. If, the results of the record search indicate that one or more cultural resources have been recorded in the project area, updating the resource(s) will be necessary and a budget augment will be required to complete that work and to prepare a more comprehensive positive report.
Task 3.1.2. Paleontological Resources Memorandum
A fossil locality search through the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (NHMLAC) will be conducted to establish the status and extent of previously recorded paleontological resources within the project area, as well as within the same or similar deposits as those found in the project area. This locality search will help determine the types of paleontological resources that may be encountered during project development. Current geologic maps of the project area will be examined, and relevant geological and paleontological literature reviewed. This Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
4 OF 20
literature review will determine which geologic units are present within the project area and provide additional information regarding the types of paleontological resources that may occur in those deposits, their scientific significance, and potential methods to mitigate impacts to those resources. Based on the information from the fossil locality search and literature review, a pedestrian survey of the project area will be conducted to note the sediments and any exposed paleontological resources that may be present. The results of the fossil locality search through the NHMLAC, the literature review, and the field survey will be documented in a paleontological resources technical memorandum. This memorandum will discuss the potential for the project to impact paleontological resources and, if needed, include avoidance measures and other recommendations to minimize these impacts.
Task 3.1.3. Biological Resources Memorandum
A biological resources memorandum will be prepared that evaluates the effect of the project on biological resources in the study area. Current information from databases, including the California Native Plant Society Inventory of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Plants of California, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s Information for Planning and Consultation, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s California Natural Diversity Database RareFind will be reviewed to identify sensitive or special-status biological resources that have a potential of occurring within or adjacent to the project area. A field survey of the project impact area will be conducted to ascertain the potential for identified elements to occur. The results of the database review and field survey will be documented in the biological resources memorandum and any appropriate avoidance and minimization measures will be identified. All observable biological and potentially jurisdictional resources will be identified; however, this scope does not include a formal jurisdictional delineation, bat emergence surveys, or focused/special-status species surveys. A formal jurisdictional delineation, and bat emergence surveys have been included as optional tasks.
Task 3.1.4. Arborist Report
An LSA Certified Arborist (certified by the International Society of Arboriculture) will visit the site to inventory all accessible trees within the project limits. The scope of this proposal is based on evaluating an estimated 30 trees.
Data pertaining to each tree (i.e., species, height, diameter at 4.5 feet above grade, health/structural stability) will be recorded on a data sheet and by digital photograph; the location of each will be recorded with a sub-meter accurate GPS unit. The results of the tree survey will be compiled into a Tree Report for use in the planning process. The scope of this proposal specifically excludes the preparation of hazard tree analysis or treatment/re- evaluation of diseased or infested trees.
Task 3.1.5. Jurisdictional Delineation
A routine/preliminary jurisdictional delineation (JD) of the subject property in accordance with the currently accepted United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) delineation methods and guidelines, as referenced below, will be completed.
Prior to conducting fieldwork, available information/data, including aerial photographs and United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps, will be reviewed to identify those areas within the delineation study area that may qualify as jurisdictional waters. Furthermore, aerial imagery and topographic maps will be used to conduct a desktop analysis of the delineation study area to identify and map any potential jurisdictional areas that can then be verified during the subsequent fieldwork.
Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
5 OF 20
If any potential USACE jurisdictional wetlands are present, a three-parameter delineation will be conducted according to the 2008 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (version 2.0) and the 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual. The jurisdictional limits of non-wetland waters of the United States (WOTUS) will be delineated according to the revised definition of “waters of the United States” (i.e., final Navigable Waters Protection Rule), which was published in the Federal Register on April 21, 2020, and became effective on June 22, 2020.
The extent of any jurisdictional streambed and, if present, any associated riparian habitat subject to review by CDFW under Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code will also be delineated. Any waters of the State (WOTS) that are identified as jurisdictional by the RWQCB and that might not otherwise be considered jurisdictional by the USACE and/or CDFW will be delineated. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) recently adopted the State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State, which became effective on May 28, 2020. Any RWQCB permit application submitted after May 28, 2020, must comply with these procedures. As such, any features that meet the new State wetland definition will be delineated in accordance with the current definition and procedures. The jurisdictional limits of non‐wetland WOTS will be identified following the applicable RWQCB guidelines.
Following the completion of the JD fieldwork, the field data collected will be analyzed to determine whether potential jurisdictional drainages on site are ephemeral, intermittent, or perennial based on the USACE’s current methods/guidelines. A technical report will be prepared presenting the methodologies and results of the JD fieldwork and subsequent analyses. This will include a geographic information system (GIS) based graphic showing the limits of potential federal and/or State jurisdictional features on site. A draft of the JD report will be provided in digital form for City review. No more than one round of consolidated document review is assumed. Upon receipt of all comments and/or suggested revisions, if any, the JD report will be summarized and a digital copy of the report submitted to the City, including all graphics and any attachments. The need for extensive revisions is not anticipated and as such LSA has allocated up to 3 hours for addressing any comments and/or suggested revisions before finalizing the report. Subsequent agency coordination and/or any other biological consulting services not specifically addressed in this scope of work are not anticipated. For instance, scope includes the preparation of a preliminary JD. Preparation and submittal of a request for a formal Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) from the USACE is not included. If an AJD is needed and/or requested, amendment to the scope and budget would be required.
Task 3.1.6. Nighttime Acoustic and Emergency Surveys for Bats (Optional) At structures where suitable bat roosting habitat is found during the assessment, follow-up nighttime surveys will be performed to verify occupancy, and to determine the numbers and species of bat(s) present. These nighttime surveys, which will be performed by the bat specialist and one trained field assistant, will begin no later than one- half hour before sunset and continue until at least two hours after sunset to permit detection of both day- and night-roosting bats within the structure. Numbers of any emerging bats will be determined visually at dusk. Any acoustic records will be used to verify bat presence and, when possible, to identify species. The acoustic monitoring will be done with full-spectrum Pettersson D-240X and Wildlife Acoustics EM3+ ultrasound detectors, with calls recorded on digital media recorders for later analysis. It is not possible to identify every call to species using this system. Some calls are fragmentary and inappropriate for analysis, while others overlap two or more potential species. In addition, not all bats recorded will be those exiting or entering the bridge in question. Some are foraging bats en route to or from other structures. It is important, therefore, to have observers on site in order to correlate calls with visual observations.
Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
6 OF 20
The potential impacts to bats from construction activities cannot be adequately assessed, nor can appropriate species-specific minimization measures be determined, without adequate knowledge of the size(s) and species composition, including any seasonal variation if present, of any bat colonies roosting within a given bridge structure. Therefore, one nighttime survey should be performed during the fall/winter season to determine the numbers and species of bats roosting within each structure containing suitable roosting habitat to assess its potential for use as a hibernacula. The other survey should be performed during the maternity season (between April 1–August 31), but preferably during the period between June 1 and August 15, in order to determine the numbers and species of any bats utilizing the bridge as a maternity roost. Separate seasonal surveys are needed because species composition and numbers of bats often change seasonally at a given roost site. These surveys would serve as preconstruction surveys for the project.
The results of all bat surveys will be documented in a letter report that will include a species list and graphic (if applicable). The report will also include recommended measures to minimize direct impacts to roosting bats; these measures will be consistent with typical bat-related CDFW measures for wildlife protection included in Streambed Alteration Agreements. Minimization measures that may be required by the resource agencies commonly include, but are not limited to, seasonal restrictions on specific work activities, humane eviction/exclusion of bats from directly affected work areas during the fall months preceding construction activities, and installation of alternative roosting habitat to mitigate for impacts to roosting habitat. Therefore, in order to avoid potential construction delays, it is useful to be aware of any potential scheduling limitations as far in advance of construction as possible. This proactive approach also facilitates coordination with the resource agencies such as CDFW.
Task 3.1.7. VMT Analysis
Our team does not believe that a full vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis (i.e., analysis of induced growth) is necessary for the proposed project. The State’s Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA and City guidelines provide specific examples of projects anticipated to have a less than significant impact on VMT. As the project could be described as the addition of turn lanes or the addition of an auxiliary lane of less than 1 mile, the project would be considered to have a less than significant impact on VMT. Furthermore, it is not anticipated that the proposed project would result in a redistribution of traffic given the absence of additional through capacity. Therefore, preparation of a traffic impact analysis (TIA) is not required.
The transportation effects will be analyzed within the IS/MND. This scope of work does not include preparation of stand‐alone technical reports. The analysis will be prepared consistent with all applicable City procedures and requirements. An independent data collection company will be contracted to collect a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic volume at the four intersections along the project boundaries and daily traffic volume at the middle of the project boundaries. A vehicle level of service (LOS) analysis will be prepared for the existing and proposed intersection configurations. If the City anticipates a redistribution of regional traffic, a future year analysis of traffic volume will be performed and provided by the City.
Vehicle LOS during construction will be analyzed. Specific items requested to perform the construction analysis will include (but are not limited to):
• Staging/phasing – A description of staging area location(s), construction phases, and phase duration (including potential overlapping phases)
• Workers (for each phase) – Approximate number of workers on a typical day, construction schedule/hours (i.e., estimated arrival/departure times), possible carpool/vanpool options, and access routes Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
7 OF 20
• Hauling/deliveries (for each phase) – Anticipated number of haul/delivery trucks on a typical day, truck schedule/hours, and designated truck routes
• Machinery/equipment (for each phase) – A description of any heavy machinery/equipment that requires transport to/from the project site (not included as part of staging or hauling/deliveries) • Lane Closures – A description of any anticipated lane closures by project phase Trip generation calculations will be prepared for the proposed project’s temporary project construction (accounting for passenger vehicle equivalents and the potential overlap of construction activities). A construction trip generation summary table will be prepared for review and approval by the City. The additional trips during the busiest construction phase will be analyzed with potential lane closures to determine whether any additional accommodations are necessary to maintain traffic flow during construction.
Responses to the CEQA Checklist questions related to transportation and traffic will be prepared and incorporated into the IS/MND. Applicable City programs, plans, ordinances, and policies addressing the circulation systems (including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities) will be researched. The proposed project’s vehicle miles traveled per State CEQA Guidelines §15064.3, subdivision (b) will be provided. The proposed project’s geometric design features and adequacy of site access will be assessed. Mitigation will be identified, if necessary for any of the four CEQA checklist questions. Supporting documentation will be provided as an appendix to the environmental document.
Task 3.1.8. Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis Memorandum A noise and vibration impact analysis memorandum will be prepared that assesses the project’s potential noise and vibration impacts. Applicable City noise and vibration standards, goals, and policies in the General Plan Noise Element and the Municipal Code for land uses within the project area will be reviewed and discussed. In addition, the memorandum will discuss vibration standards in the 2018 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual for land uses adjacent to the project site.
Up to two long-term ambient noise level measurements will be conducted within the project area. The long-term ambient noise level will be documented for 24 hours. Noise sources in the project area will be identified. The ambient noise levels will be used to assess the existing ambient noise environment in the project vicinity. The areas with potential noise impacts will be identified using land use information, aerial photographs, and field reconnaissance.
Noise impacts from construction sources will be analyzed based on the equipment expected to be used, length of a specific construction task, equipment power type (gasoline or diesel engine), horsepower, load factor, and percent of time in use. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) recommended noise emission levels will be used for the construction equipment. The construction noise impact will be evaluated in terms of the maximum instantaneous noise levels (Lmax), hourly equivalent continuous sound levels (Leq), and frequency of occurrence at adjacent sensitive locations. Analysis requirements will be based on the sensitivity of the area and City Noise Ordinance specifications.
Vibration impacts from construction sources will be analyzed based on the equipment expected to be used. The FTA-recommended equipment vibration levels will be used for the construction equipment. The construction vibration impact will be evaluated in terms of the peak particle velocity (PPV, measured in inches per second [in/sec]) and the vibration velocity decibels (VdB) for building damage and human annoyance, respectively.
Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
8 OF 20
Analysis requirements will be provided based on the sensitivity of the area directly adjacent to the project site, City vibration standards, and the FTA recommendations.
Noise levels generated from aircraft operations in the project vicinity and vehicular traffic will be evaluated.
Aircraft noise will be assessed based on the project location and the location of the airport noise contour. For vehicular traffic, the proposed project is not anticipated to generate new vehicular traffic trips. However, vehicular traffic on Cannon Street may increase due to area growth and traffic currently using other existing routes being attracted to the improved road. Noise impacts from vehicular traffic will be assessed using the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model for the noise impact analysis.
Model input data needed include average daily traffic (ADT) volumes, peak-hour traffic volumes, percentages of autos and medium and heavy trucks, vehicle speeds, ground attenuation factors, and roadway widths. The 24- hour weighted average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) along Cannon Street that would be affected will be tabulated. Traffic parameters necessary for the model input will be obtained from the traffic study prepared for this project.
Avoidance or minimization measures designed to reduce short- and long-term noise and vibration impacts to acceptable levels will be determined where necessary.
Task 3.1.9. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis Memorandum An analysis that assesses the project’s potential impacts on air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will be conducted. Baseline and project setting meteorological and air quality data in the South Coast Air Basin area provided by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and climatological and air quality profile data gathered by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) will be utilized for the description of existing ambient air quality. Air quality data from the Anaheim air quality monitoring station for the past 3 years will be included to help highlight existing air quality local to the proposed project limits.
Construction would take place during project implementation. Air quality impacts associated with construction to the extent the project specific details are known, such as road demolition, grading, and paving information, the construction equipment used, and the length of time for a specific construction task. Exhaust and dust emissions from worker commutes and equipment travel would also contribute to construction emissions will be assessed.
Fugitive dust emissions would result from earth disturbing operations, vehicles traveling on paved and unpaved roads, and wind erosion of any exposed soil and soil storage piles.
Construction emissions commensurate with the available project‐specific information (e.g., the start and end dates, operations schedule, equipment inventory, soil import and/or soil and construction waste export quantities, and location from/to which soil and waste will be hauled) or standard defaults, will be calculated using the latest version of the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) and following the SCAQMD California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Air Quality Handbook guidelines. For specific construction details not provided, the analysis will use assumptions based on standard construction practices. Standard measures for construction activities recommended by the SCAQMD will be identified and incorporated as part of the proposed project’s standard conditions.
A localized significance analysis will be prepared to evaluate the potential impacts on the nearby sensitive receptors along Yale Boulevard from emissions from both short‐term construction activities and long‐term project operations. These localized significance threshold (LST) impacts will be evaluated using the SCAQMD’s LST screening‐level methodology.
Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
9 OF 20
The GHG emissions associated with construction activities will be calculated using the same methodology as described above. The calculations will consider emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), a key GHG identified in Assembly Bill 32, and other major GHGs such as methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) from construction‐related sources.
The proposed project would add an additional thru-lane in one direction and widen sections of the roadway, thus improving the level of service. These changes are not expected to generate new vehicular traffic trips. However, vehicular traffic on Cannon Street may increase due to area growth and traffic currently using other existing routes being attracted to the improved road. The air quality and GHG analysis will compare the emissions from the proposed project traffic with the existing condition to determine the potential impacts. Model input data needed include average daily traffic (ADT) volumes, peak-hour traffic volumes, percentages of autos and medium and heavy trucks, and average vehicle speeds.
Task 3.1.10. Phase 1 Initial Site Assessment (ISA)
Leighton will prepare a limited Initial Site Assessment (ISA) to identify existing hazardous materials conditions that might affect the project. Leighton will review selected federal, state, and regional environmental agency databases for information pertaining to sites and facilities within the specified minimum search distances established by E 1527-13/-21 and AAI. The records review will include historical sources of information that show the site such as aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, property tax files, recorded land title records, USGS 15 and/or 7.5-minute USGS topographic maps, local street directories, building department records, zoning/land use records, and other historical sources
Leighton will visit the site for an observational reconnaissance to look for exposed and visible indications of environmental conditions. This includes observations of the current conditions of the onsite structures, roads, potable water supply, sewage disposal system, hazardous substances and petroleum products, aboveground and underground storage tanks or vent pipes, fill pipes or access ways indicating an underground storage tank, odors, pools of liquid, sumps, drums, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) containing equipment, heating and/or cooling system, stains or corrosion, pits, ponds or lagoons, stained soil or pavement, stressed vegetation, solid waste, wastewater (including clarifiers), wells and dumping. Land use of immediately adjacent properties will be visually and/or physically observed and documented and conditions indicative of hazardous materials or potential hazardous materials concerns will be documented, to the extent possible. Current site conditions will be photographed.
Where warranted by the research and observation, Leighton will make reasonable attempts to conduct interviews with persons identified as knowledgeable about past and present site usage. A reasonable attempt will also be made to interview local government officials for information regarding hazardous waste disposal or other environmental issues that may exist at the site.
Leighton will prepare an Initial Site Assessment Report summarizing the findings and conclusions and providing recommendations. The report will state data gaps due to a lack of or inability to obtain information on the site despite Leighton’s good faith efforts. No subsurface exploration, sampling or testing is included.
Task 3.2. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
As described above, the approach to the Environmental Document includes the preparation of key technical studies that would be used to support the IS, MND, or CE, as applicable. Based on the results of the technical studies, the two options for environmental clearance are proposed:
Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
10 OF 20
1. In the event the technical studies conclude the project may result in a potentially significant impacts requiring mitigation, an IS/MND would be prepared for clearance under CEQA.
2. In the event the technical studies demonstrate the project would not result in any potentially significant impacts requiring mitigation, a Notice of Exemption would be prepared. If this occurs, a revised scope would be provided to the City.
The RFP requests an analysis based off of an Initial Study (IS) be prepared for the project, and if any significant impacts requiring mitigation are identified during preparation of the technical studies, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) would be prepared for CEQA compliance. Rather than providing a separate IS that only identifies potentially significant impacts, the IS will be combined with the MND so that there is only one document for the City to review. The following tasks would be included with the preparation of the IS/MND:
Administrative Draft IS/MND. An Administrative Draft IS/MND will be prepared and submitted in an electronic copy for City review. The format will be consistent with the City’s IS Checklist, and the technical analyses from the memoranda described in Task 2 above will be incorporated into the IS/MND. The City’s comments on the Administrative Draft IS/MND will be responded to; necessary revisions completed; and copies of the revised document submitted for City review. This scope and budget anticipates one set of non-conflicting and consolidated comments.
Public Review Draft IS/MND. Upon receipt of City comments on the revised Draft IS/MND, the IS/MND will be revised and submitted to the City for review prior to distribution for public review. Digital copies, either website upload or USB drive, of the document will submitted to the City, State Clearinghouse, responsible and trustee agencies, and City libraries; no hard copies would be produced. The Draft IS/MND will be made available for public review on the City’s website, the State Clearinghouse’s website through the CEQANet database, and on the websites for City libraries.
Notice of Intent/Public Notice. In coordination with City staff, a combined Draft Notice of Intent/Public Notice regarding the availability of the Draft IS/MND for public review, which will be mailed with the document for public review will be prepared. The City will be responsible for publication of the public notice in a general circulation newspaper. Copies of the public notice will be mailed to interested parties/property owners on a distribution list provided by the City. A Notice of Completion will be filed with the State Clearinghouse to begin the required public review period. The Notice of Intent/Public Notice will be filed with the Orange County Clerk-Recorder.
Response to Comments/Errata. Written responses to comments received on the Draft IS/MND that raise substantive environmental issues will be prepared and submitted to the City for review after the close of the public comment period. Revisions to the text of the Draft IS/MND will be provided in a separate Errata document in order to minimize the level of effort associated with the Response to Comments. After receipt of City comments, the Draft IS/MND, Response to Comments, and Errata will be finalized for Transportation Commission, Planning Commission, and City Council review. Our scope and budget anticipate one set of non-conflicting and consolidated comments.
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. A Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMRP) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15097 will be prepared for use in ensuring implementation of the identified mitigation measures for the project. The Draft MMRP will be submitted electronically to the City for review and comment, and the Final MMRP will be provided to the City along with the IS/MND.
Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
11 OF 20
Notice of Determination. A Notice of Determination (NOD) will be prepared and submitted to the City for signature. The NOD will be filed with the Orange County Clerk-Recorder following the City’s adoption of the IS/MND. The CDFW filing fee and County Clerk filing fees will be provided by the City. Filing fees will be submitted to the County Clerk with the NOD.
Task 3.3. Regulatory Permitting
Permit applications will be prepared for the 404 permit, 401 Certification, and Streambed Alteration Agreement, if impacts to jurisdictional waters are identified during preparation of the technical analysis supporting the IS/MND.
Task 3.3.1. 404 Permit Application
Obtaining authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires that the applicant prepare a notification requesting authorization for fill of jurisdictional waters. It is assumed the proposed impacts to any USACE jurisdiction on site will qualify for a Nationwide Permit (NWP). Preparation and submittal a Preconstruction Notification (PCN) to the USACE is proposed. A detailed form required by the USACE will be completed as part of the PCN submittal along with a detailed cover letter, including graphics and various other attachments (e.g., cultural resources report, proposed construction and maintenance BMPs). There is no filing fee required by the USACE as part of their permit process. The PCN package will be provided in draft form for City review. One round of revisions is specified. Upon receipt of a consolidated set of comments or suggested revisions, the application will be finalized and a copy of the submittal package distributed to the City and the applicable agencies. This proposal does not include an allocation of consultant time and budget for 1) the preparation of a Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP); or 2) the processing of all the details associated with participating in an agency-approved mitigation bank or acquiring and/or setting up a conservation easement (or deed restriction) over off-site properties. If an HMMP is required by the USACE, amendment to this scope of work would be required.
Task 3.3.2. Section 401 Water Quality Certification Application It is anticipated that a project-specific Section 401 water quality certification from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) will be necessary for the proposed project. This effort involves preparing a separate application package for submittal to RWQCB that includes preparing a detailed form required by RWQCB. This form addresses water quality and wetland issues, best management practices, and potential impacts to beneficial water uses. Any compensatory mitigation measure prepared and proposed for the PCN described above will also apply to this application submittal. If a Water Quality Management Plan has been or will be prepared, it too will be included with the application package. In expediting the permit process, it is important to note that the USACE will not issue its final authorization as a condition of the NWP until the USACE has received a copy of the water quality certification from the RWQCB. RWQCB requires a fee for fill or dredge operations based on the quantity of fill with respect to waters of the United States. This application filing fee will be provided by the City and included in the Section 401 application package. The application package will be provided in draft form for City review. One round of revisions of the application is anticipated. Upon receipt of a consolidated set of comments or suggested revisions, the permit package will be finalized and a copy of the application package distributed to the City and the applicable agencies.
Task 3.3.3. Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Notification Through provisions of the California Fish and Game Code (Section 1600 et seq.), the CDFW has jurisdiction to enter into agreements for any alteration of a river, stream, or lake where fish or wildlife resources may be adversely affected. Preparation and submittal of a Notification of Streambed Alteration to CDFW is proposed. A Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
12 OF 20
detailed form (FG2023) required by the CDFW will need to be completed as part of the notification package along with a detailed cover letter, including graphics and various other attachments. Two of the attachments required by CDFW are a copy of the signed, stamped, and finalized CEQA Notice of Determination (NOD) or Notice of Exemption (NOE) and proof that the CEQA filing fee (if applicable) has been paid to CDFW. Lastly, the applicable Streambed Alteration filing fee, based on the estimated cost associated with the activity resulting in impacts to CDFW jurisdiction, will be provided by the City. The notification package will be provided in draft form for City review. One round of revisions is assumed. Upon receipt of a consolidated set of comments or suggested revisions, the notification package will be finalized and a copy of the notification package distributed to the City and the applicable agencies. A comprehensive mitigation plan, such as an HMMP, is not expected to be required as part of this authorization effort; however, if CDFW or one of the other agencies should require a comprehensive mitigation plan, amendment to this scope of work would be required.
Task 3.4. PS&E Environmental Compliance Review
In support of completion of 95% PS&E, LSA will complete an Environmental Compliance Review to ensure that all environmental commitments and regulatory permit conditions of approval are correctly included in the project design and specifications. LSA will review 95% plan sheets and confirm locations of environmentally sensitive areas and environmental work limits as required by the CEQA document and regulatory permits. LSA will also review 95% specifications to confirm that environmental commitments are correctly included. Finally, LSA will support the City to meet its regulatory permit mitigation obligations by identifying mitigation banks that would be meet the qualifications for purchase of mitigation bank credits or payment of in- lieu fees, as applicable and appropriate pursuant to regulatory permits.
• Cultural Resources Memorandum
• Paleontological Resources Memorandum
• Biological Resources Memorandum
• Arborist Report
• Jurisdictional Delineation (optional)
• Nighttime Acoustic and Emergent Bat Survey (optional) • VMT Analysis
• Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis Memorandum
• Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis Memorandum • Initial Site Assessment Report
• Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Resource/Regulatory Agency Permits
TASK 4. STRUCTURAL BRIDGE WIDENING DESIGN
Task 4.1. Bridge Feasibility Report
Mark Thomas will prepare a Bridge Feasibility Report to assist the City in determining the best suited widening alternative for the project. Prior to preparing the Bridge Feasibility Report, Mark Thomas will discuss with the City Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
13 OF 20
the alternatives to be considered in the report. Two different alternatives are assumed to be presented in the report, which will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the alternatives and will address geotechnical, hydraulic, constructability, right of way, and environmental issues, as well as costs. The report will include a General Plan and General Plan Estimate for each alternative. The report will be submitted to the City for review and approval.
Task 4.2. 65% Structure Plans
Mark Thomas will prepare structural calculations and bridge plans for the selected widening alternative. For the purposes of this scope of work, it is assumed that a three-span precast I girder will be the preferred structure alternative. The structure design will be performed in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 8th Edition with California Amendments and Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria, Version 2.0. The latest versions of the Caltrans Bridge Design Manuals will be used. It is assumed that bridge aesthetics will not be included in the design. In general, it is anticipated that the following structure plan sheets will be prepared:
Bridge Plans # of sheets
General Plan 1
Index to Plans 1
Foundation Plan 1
Abutment Layout 1
Abutment Details 2
Pier Layout 1
Typical Section 1
Girder Layout 1
Girder Details 1
Utility Details 2
Log of Test Borings 4
Total Bridge Plan Sheets 16
Task 4.3. 95% Structure Plans
City comments from the 65% submittal will be addressed and incorporated into the 95% design. Responses to comments will be prepared and submitted.
Mark Thomas will perform an independent design check of the bridge plans in conformance with Caltrans bridge design procedures. The independent check will be completed by an engineer who was not involved in the original design of the structure. Calculations and computer runs will be performed to check the bridge layout and structural integrity. Upon completion of the independent check, discrepancies between the designer and checker will be reconciled and plans updated.
Task 4.4. Structure Special Provisions
Mark Thomas will develop structure special provisions using 2018 Caltrans Standard Specifications. The structure special provisions will be prepared using Microsoft Word. Special provisions for the bridge will be submitted at the 95% and Final submittals. It is assumed the City will provide the roadway special provisions and boilerplate contract language and will fold the structure special provisions in at the 95% submittal.
Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
14 OF 20
Task 4.5. Engineer’s Estimate
Mark Thomas will develop quantities and prepare construction cost estimates for the bridge widening. Cost estimates will be calculated at the 65%, 95%, and Final submittals. Construction costs will be developed using current bid results from similar projects, Caltrans database information and from Caltrans latest Construction Cost Manual. All estimates will be done in Caltrans BEES format using Microsoft Excel.
Task 4.6. Final PS&E Submittal
City comments from the 95% submittal will be addressed and incorporated into the final design. Responses to comments will be prepared and submitted. All final plan revisions will be made. Updates to the specifications and estimate will be completed. A bid ready PS&E package will be submitted. • Bridge Feasibility Report
• Structure Plans (PDF) at 65%, 95%, and Final Submittals • Structure Engineer’s Estimate (EXCEL) at 65%, 95% and Final Submittals • Structure Special Provisions (Word) at 95% and Final Submittals • Response to Comments Matrix (PDF) at 95% and Final Submittals • Bridge Design Calculations
• Bridge Independent Check Calculations
TASK 5. HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS
Task 5.1. Bridge Hydraulic Report
Q3 Consulting will prepare Bridge Hydraulic Reports to support the design of the bridge widening over the Santiago Creek. Work will include identification of the design hydrology, and the preparation of hydraulic and local scour analyses necessary to support the Cannon Street bridge widening as well as to ensure the project is not creating adverse impacts to the effective floodplain limits. Long-term degradation will be based on previous studies and available historic information. No long-term sediment transport analysis is included as part of this work. This task shall include coordination with Orange County Public Works for identification of the design hydrology, and review and approval of the bridge widening. Draft and final Bridge Hydraulics Reports will be prepared to document the results of the analysis. The document will include a discussion of the approach and methodology for the analysis and a summary of the results. The hydraulic and local scour calculations will be included in a technical appendix. The document will be prepared in a format acceptable for review by the approving agencies.
Task 5.2. Roadway Hydrology & Hydraulics
Mark Thomas will prepare a Cannon Street Hydrology and Hydraulic Report. The report will include both off-site and on-site hydrologic calculations to recommend any drainage for improvements proposed. Focus of the effort is on the street flows and flooded width, specific to the need to relocate existing catch basins or add additional catch basins due to changes in runoff patterns in the vicinity of the bridge. It is assumed there will be no change in the storm drain outlet location to Santiago Creek, nor will additional outlets to the creek be required. Calculations Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
15 OF 20
and recommendations shall conform to the Orange County Hydrology Manual requirements. Drainage, junction structure, and pipe structural and load calculations are not included. No Orange County Flood Control master drainage plan facilities are included with our analysis.
Prior to the commencement of report preparation, Mark Thomas will meet with the City to review their storm drain improvement plans and provide value engineering and constructability recommendations as necessary and to obtain a thorough understand of the City’s proposed drainage system. Mark Thomas will provide one submittal to the City and redlines to the City’s storm drain improvement plans to increase pipe or catch basin sizes and pipe HGL/velocities for the City to incorporate prior to any AHJ submittals.
The study area is limited to the project site and drain design and plan preparation is excluded; all catch basin modifications, junction structure and pipe plan/profile/construction drawings are assumed to be the City’s responsibility.
• Draft and Final Bridge Hydraulic report
• Santiago Creek HEC-RAS computer models (digital files) • Cannon Street Hydrology & Hydraulics Report
TASK 6. RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING
It is assumed that acquisitions (temporary and/or permanent) may be needed from the following parcels:
Assessor Parcel No Owner Permanent TCE
370-041-027 County of Orange
X
370-042-001 County of Orange X X
370-042-007 County of Orange
X
370-081-031 OCFCD X X
370-081-032 City Equestrian Ease. X
370-081-033 City Equestrian Ease. X
Task 6.1. Plat & Legal Descriptions
Once right of way needs have been identified and received authorization, Mark Thomas will prepare up to eight legal descriptions with 8-1/2” x 11” plats. One round of minor revisions is included in this scope of work. If additional legal descriptions are required additional fee will be negotiated. • Plat & Legal Descriptions (Total 8) in PDF Format
Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
16 OF 20
TASK 7. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Lin Consulting, Inc. (LIN) staff will meet (virtually) and coordinate with the project team and City. LIN will attend up to four meetings via teleconference; and will coordinate with the City and Southern California Edison (SCE) on design requirements.
Task 7.1. Street Lighting PS&E
LIN will prepare street lighting PS&E for relocation and/or installation of streetlights impacted by the proposed widening of Cannon Street between Santiago Canyon Road and Serrano Avenue in City of Orange. Video fiber or interconnect plans are not included. Temporary street lighting design and plans are also not included. In general, it is anticipated that the following street lighting plan sheets will be prepared:
Plans # of sheets
Street Lighting (1:40 scale) 2
Total Street Lighting Plan Sheets 2
Task 7.2. Traffic Signal Modification PS&E
LIN will prepare traffic signal modification PS&E for the intersection of Cannon Street and Taft Avenue impacted by the proposed widening of Cannon Street between Santiago Canyon Road and Serrano Avenue in City of Orange. It is assumed that traffic signal modification plans are not needed for any intersection other than the intersection of Cannon Street and Taft Avenue. Temporary traffic signal design and plans are not included. In general, it is anticipated that the following traffic signal modification plan sheets will be prepared:
Plans # of sheets
Traffic Signal Modification (1:20 scale) 1
Total Traffic Signal Mod Plan Sheets 1
Task 7.3. Geometric Refinement
A workshop will be conducted with City staff to evaluate the geometric alternatives for the project, including those presented in the Mark Thomas proposal. Outcome will be a final alternative approved by the City that will move into final design.
Task 7.4. Traffic Handling PS&E
Utilizing the City's 35% geometric drawings, Mark Thomas will prepare traffic handling PS&E. In general, it is anticipated that the following plan sheets will be prepared:
Plans # of sheets
Stage Construction / Traffic Handling 4
Total Traffic Handling Plan Sheets 4
Task 7.5. Signing and Striping PS&E
Utilizing the City's 35% geometric drawings, Mark Thomas will prepare signing and striping PS&E. In general, it is anticipated that the following plan sheets will be prepared:
Plans # of sheets
Signing and Striping Plan 2
Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
17 OF 20
Plans # of sheets
Total Signing and Striping Plan Sheets 2
• Street Lighting Plans (PDF) at 65%, 95%, and Final Submittals • Traffic Signal Modification Plan (PDF) at 65%, 95%, and Final Submittals • Signing and Striping Plans (PDF) at 65%, 95%, and Final Submittals • Traffic Handling Plans (PDF) at 65%, 95%, and Final Submittals TASK 8. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Task 8.1. Preliminary Foundation Report
EMI will prepare a Preliminary Foundation Report (PFR) for widening of Santiago Creek Bridge (Bridge No. 55C- 0184) to provide preliminary geotechnical information to assist structural designers in the Type Selection process.
This PFR will be prepared using the available subsurface data presented in the RFP and the format will be in accordance with the current Caltrans Guidelines.
Task 8.2. Geotechnical Explorations
Based on the as-built plans, four borings were performed for the previous widening of the existing bridge. These borings are located on the east side of the bridge. Two borings are located near the abutments and two borings are located near Pier 2 (one of the borings encountered shallow refusal).
Based on the information presented in the RFP, the City’s current assessment is that the available geotechnical data is sufficient to support the design scope of this project. It is our understanding that substructure width of final bridge will be less than 100 feet. Therefore, as-built borings from previous widening may be used for this project. Borings were not performed near Pier 3 as part of the previous widening; therefore, a boring will need to be performed near proposed Pier 3. However, due to the access limitations at the piers and environmental permit constraints, it will be difficult to perform a boring at Pier 3. Since the existing borings were primarily located on the east side of the existing bridge, EMI is proposing to perform supplemental borings on northwest and southwest corners of the existing bridge, near the abutments. Even though one supplemental boring may be sufficient on the west side of the existing bridge, we are proposing to drill two soil borings for the bridge widening because the cost for the second boring is minimal considering the mobilization-demobilization of the drilling equipment and setup of the traffic control for the first soil boring. EMI’s geotechnical field exploration plan for the proposed widening project is presented in the table below. Data obtained from as-built boreholes will also be used for foundation design.
Design Element Proposed # of Borings Approximate Proposed Depth (ft) Santiago Creek Bridge (West side Widening) 2 70
Roadway Improvements 3 5
Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
18 OF 20
Bridge borings will be excavated using a truck-mounted or track-mounted drilling rig equipped with 8-inch diameter hollow-stem augers or 4-inch rotary-wash drill rods. Asphalt concrete cold-patch will be used to replace asphalt that is removed by excavations, and quick-set cement will be used to replace concrete that is removed by excavations.
EMI will drill shallow hand auger borings (5-foot deep) every 500 feet along the proposed new pavement locations to collect bulk samples; a total of three shallow borings will be drilled for the project.
Traffic Control: In order to perform borings along Cannon Road, traffic control will be provided following CA MUTCD guidelines. It is our assumption that Traffic control plans will not be required.
EMI will prepare a boring location plan and this plan will be used to secure encroachment permit from City of Orange. It is our assumption that this encroachment permit will be a no-fee permit. Since the borings will be located along the street, it is our assumption that encroachment permits from County of Orange or Orange County Flood Control District will not be required. Any other permits, if required, will be secured by others.
EMI field personnel will collect soil samples for laboratory testing, including bulk samples of near-surface soils and small disturbed and relatively undisturbed ring samples of deeper soils. The small disturbed and relatively undisturbed soil samples will be collected using split-spoon samplers at a vertical interval of about 5 feet, alternating between the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler and the Modified California Drive (MCD) sampler. Samples of subsurface soils will be logged during the field investigation, secured in their containers, or collected in plastic bags, and transported to the EMI laboratory.
Task 8.3. Laboratory Testing
Field logs of the boreholes will be reviewed to select representative soil samples for laboratory testing. Various laboratory tests will be performed on soil samples to determine or derive their physical and engineering characteristics. Anticipated laboratory tests include in-situ density and moisture content, grain size, Atterberg Limits, UU triaxial, direct shear, consolidation, R-value, and soil corrosion tests. Laboratory tests will be conducted in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards or California Test methods.
Task 8.4. Geotechnical Engineering Analyses
Results obtained from the field explorations and laboratory testing will be used to characterize subsurface soils and conditions and create idealized soil profiles for design purpose. The following analyses will be performed for the project:
• Evaluation of seismicity and estimation of Peak Ground Acceleration based on the Caltrans design criteria, and recommendation of an ARS curve for the bridge structural design. • Assessment of soil liquefaction potential, seismic settlement, and lateral spreading. • Foundation analysis for bridge.
• Assessment of global slope stability and settlement of embankments. • Evaluation of soil corrosivity conditions and recommendations for mitigation measures. • Design of pavement structural section in accordance with the Caltrans method.
Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
19 OF 20
Task 8.5. Report Preparation
EMI will prepare a Geotechnical Report to provide the geotechnical design and construction recommendations for bridge widening and pavement structural sections. EMI will address any comments resulting from the City of Orange review and prepare a final Geotechnical Report.
• Preliminary Foundation Report
• Geotechnical Report
TASK 9. LANDSCAPE/IRRIGATION
Task 9.1. Landscape Concept Plan
Mark Thomas will gather information during meetings with City staff to understand their goals for the project.
Mark Thomas will obtain electronic base plans and as-built landscape and irrigation plans and verify them with observable field conditions. Additionally, we will review City design standards and specifications to identify specific landscape requirements identified and discuss in a meeting with City maintenance staff to identify their goals for the planting design and maintenance concerns. Based on the collected information, Mark Thomas will prepare three (3) alternative landscape design options. Each option will include a 500’ section of typical landscape and aesthetic hardscape improvements for the corridor. It is assumed that hardscape aesthetic details will be isolated to use within the median only. A general, per-square-foot construction and maintenance cost estimate will be prepared for each alternative for budgeting purposes. Each landscape plan will include a proposed, illustrative plant list, tree locations, ground level plant massings, and hardscape features. A narrative on the recommended irrigation methodology will be included. This plan will be prepared in AutoCAD at 20-scale, augmented with color rendering and notations of site features, and will be delivered electronically in color. Upon completion of the 3 alternative designs, LAUD will meet with the City and design team to select the preferred alternative. The preferred alternative will then be drafted onto the entire corridor in preparation for the 65% PS&E task.
Task 9.2. 65% Landscape Plans and Cost Estimate
Based on the chosen, preferred alternative and comments received on the Landscape Concept Plan, Mark Thomas will prepare 65% plans and cost estimate. 65% plans will include planting plans and irrigation plans (in AutoCAD, 20-scale) and coordination with the civil team on necessary tree and irrigation removals. For this scope, it is assumed 31 trees, all of which are over the City’s threshold of 42”, of unknown species and size will be removed. These trees will be replaced with trees from the City’s List of Recommended Street Trees based on the ratios outlined in the Master Street Tree Plan. Planting plans will include tree, shrub, and groundcover locations, plant list, plant callouts and quantities, and associated details. Irrigation plans will include points of connection locations, mainline layout, pressure loss calculations, irrigation equipment list, and associated details. In general, it is anticipated that the following landscape plan sheets will be prepared:
Landscape Plans # of sheets
Planting Plan and Details 8
Irrigation Plan and Details 8
Total Landscape Plan Sheets 16
Cannon Street Widening Project
City of Orange
20 OF 20
Task 9.3. 95% Landscape PS&E
City comments from the 65% submittal will be addressed and incorporated into the 95% design. Responses will be prepared and submitted. Irrigation removal plans will identify specific equipment to be removed and tie-in locations as applicable. Irrigation plans will include water use (MWELO) calculations, irrigation head and lateral layout with pipe sizing.
Task 9.4. Final Landscape PS&E Submittal
City comments from the 95% submittal will be addressed and incorporated into the final design. Responses to comments will be prepared and submitted. All final plan revisions will be made. Updates to the specifications and estimate will be completed.
• Three (3) color-rendered Landscape Concept Plans (24x36 format) • Budgetary Cost Estimate for each concept (8-1/2x11 PDF) • Planting Plan and Details (PDF) at 65%, 95%, and Final Submittals • Irrigation Plan and Details (PDF) at 65%, 95%, and Final Submittals • Landscape Construction Cost Estimate (PDF) at 65%, 95%, and Final Submittals • Landscape Special Provisions in City approved format.
Assumptions/Exclusions
• City is preparing roadway design, plans, cost estimate and special provisions. • No 3D modeling or public support is included.
• Bid support, construction support and as-built drawings are not included.
Engineering Manager
Technical Lead
Project Engineer
Design Engineer II
Design Engineer I
Sr. Technician
Survey Manager
Project Surveyor
Lead Survey Technician
Sr. Survey Technician
2 Person Field Crew
LAUD Division Manager
LAUD Project Manager
Landscape Architect
Landscape Designer II
Landscape Designer I
Sr. Project Accountant
Sr. Project Coordinator
EARTH MECHANICS
LEIGHTON
LIN
LSA
Q3
$304 $207 $156 $136 $111 $138 $211 $172 $156 $125 $306 $245 $200 $141 $112 $90 $175 $138
1.0 PROJECT ADMINSTRATION
1.1 Project Management 28 14 22 64 $13,998 - - - 7,500 - $21,498
1.2 Project Meetings 32 12 14 58 $14,060 - - - 12,500 $26,560
1.3 Project Schedule 12 12 $3,648 - - - - - $3,648
1.4 Quality Control 32 32 $9,728 - - - - - $9,728 Subtotal Phase 1 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 14 36 166 $41,434 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $61,434
2.0 SURVEY
2.1 Control Survey 8 24 8 20 4 64 $13,488 - - - - - $13,488
2.2 Boundary Survey 8 32 24 20 2 86 $16,588 - - - - - $16,588
2.3 Field Survey 8 16 8 64 70 6 172 $35,936 - - - - - $35,936 Subtotal Phase 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 72 8 96 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 322 $66,012 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $66,012
3.0 CEQA REQUIREMENTS
3.1 Technical Studies 12 8 20 $4,536 - 6,772 - 72,800 - $84,108
3.2 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 8 8 16 $4,032 - - - 62,000 - $66,032
3.3 Regulatory Permitting 8 8 16 $3,320 - - - 35,000 - $38,320 Subtotal Phase 3 28 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 52 $11,888 $0 $6,772 $0 $169,800 $0 $188,460
4.0 STRUCTURAL BRIDGE WIDENING DESIGN
4.1 Bridge Feasibility Report 8 24 80 40 152 $23,800 - - - - - $23,800
4.2 65% Structure Plans 40 200 160 400 $57,560 - - - - - $57,560
4.3 95% Structure Plans 20 160 80 60 320 $48,260 - - - - - $48,260
4.4 Structure Special Provisions 20 20 $4,140 - - - - - $4,140
4.5 Engineer's Estimate 80 80 $10,880 - - - - - $10,880
4.6 Final PS&E Submittal 24 80 40 144 $21,368 - - - - - $21,368 Subtotal Phase 4 8 128 160 520 0 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1116 $166,008 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $166,008
5.0 HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS
5.1 Bridge Hydraulic Report 8 8 $1,656 - - - - 28,556 $30,212
5.2 Roadway Hydrology / Hydraulics 8 8 40 56 $7,344 - - - - - $7,344 Subtotal Phase 5 0 16 8 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 $9,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,556 $37,556
6.0 RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING
6.1 Plat & Legal Descriptions 20 40 80 140 $21,100 - - - - - $21,100 Subtotal Phase 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 40 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 $21,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,100
7.0 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
7.1 Street Lighting PS&E 0 $0 - - 15,240 - - $15,240
7.2 Traffic Signal Modification PS&E 0 $0 - - 10,315 - - $10,315
7.3 Geometric Refinement 8 4 16 40 68 $10,196 - - - - $10,196
7.4 Traffic Handling PS&E 4 8 140 152 $17,616 - - - - - $17,616
7.5 Signing/Striping PS&E 4 8 80 92 $10,956 - - - - - $10,956 Subtotal Phase 7 8 12 32 0 260 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 312 $38,768 $0 $0 $25,555 $0 $0 $64,323
8.0 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
8.1 Preliminary Foundation Report 8 8 $1,656 3,750 - - - - $5,406
8.2 Geotechnical Explorations 0 $0 4,290 - - - - $4,290
8.3 Laboratory Testing 0 $0 3,990 - - - - $3,990
8.4 Geotechnical Engineering Analysis 0 $0 13,990 - - - - $13,990
8.5 Report Preparation 2 6 8 $1,850 17,460 - - - - $19,310 Subtotal Phase 8 2 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 $3,506 $43,480 $0 $0 $0 $0 $46,986
9.0 LANDSCAPE/IRRIGATION
9.1 Landscape Concept Plan 4 32 80 32 40 188 $25,844 - - - - - $25,844
9.2 65% Landscape Plans/Cost Estimate 2 24 40 60 60 186 $23,050 - - - - - $23,050
9.3 95% Landscape PS&E 2 12 40 60 40 154 $18,850 - - - - - $18,850
9.4 Final Landscape PS&E Submittal 2 20 40 60 40 162 $20,450 - - - - - $20,450 Subtotal Phase 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 88 200 212 180 0 0 690 $88,194 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $88,194 TOTAL HOURS 150 170 200 520 316 300 44 112 8 176 110 10 108 200 212 180 14 48 2878 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $4,700 $7,975 $845 $0 $8,000 $500 $22,020 TOTAL COST $45,600 $35,190 $31,200 $70,720 $35,076 $41,400 $9,284 $19,264 $1,248 $22,000 $33,660 $2,450 $21,600 $28,200 $23,744 $16,200 $2,450 $6,624 $450,610 $51,455 $7,617 $25,555 $197,800 $29,056 $762,093
OPTIONAL TASKS
Tree & Irrigation Removal Plans (4 sheets) 4 16 40 80 80 220 $25,980 - - - - $25,980 Nighttime Acoustic and Emergency Surveys for Bats 0 $0 - - - 4,000 - $4,000 COST PROPOSAL FOR PROJECT SCOPE: City of Orange - Cannon Street Widening (SP-4178)
TOTAL COST
Subconsultants
Total
Hours
Total MT
Cost