City of Orange
„CORPORATED
Community Development Department
300 E. Chapman Avenue
Orange, CA 92866
714-744-7220 APPEAL APPLICATION
APPEAL APPLICATION NO. APP- 0560
This application must be filled out completely. Any appeal shall be filed with the Community Development Department Planning Division within fifteen (15) calendar days after the hearing or action from which the appeal is made (OMC Section 17.08.050 C). The $1000.00 filing fee (initial deposit - actual cost required) must accompany the appeal.
Name of Appellants) Arianna Barios, Concilwoman
Address of Appellants) 300 E. Chapman Avenue, Orange 92866 Phone No. (day) (cell)
PROJECT INFORMATION:
Appeal of action on case number: JRC#5077-22
Project address: 529. 5. Grand Street
REASON FOR REQUEST: Please specify and explain WHY you are appealing the decision or determination and indicate specifically the error or abuse of discretion (OMC Section 17.08.050 C).
Based on evidence presented at the hearing and testimony from the public, the following required findings for approval cannot be met:
1) The project does not conform to the Historic Preservation Design standards ut it is not
i te location of did rebe and the view mom any tie he necess of negatwely Impact the historic district..
i accessory structures should be of a utilitarian design but the proposed bullding is a smaller replica of the main house.
10/20/22
Signature of Appellant (or representative) Date
PLANNING DIVISION USE ONLY: Date of hearing or decision and hearing body Application checked by Date & Time Received
N: CDD PLNG\Administration\Forms & Templates Appeal Form. DOC (Continued from Appeal Application)
2) The project does not conform with the Secretary of the Interior's standards for the same reasons.
3) The project negatively impacts community aesthetics. 4) The project does not preserve or enhance existing neighborhood character and aesthetics and negatively impacts them.
5) The CEQA exemption should not be applied because the project is in a sensitive historic district, could cause a substantial change in a historic resource, doesn't meet the design standards, and necessitates further CEQA review.