901 East Katella Avenue Residential Development Project
FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARIATION
NO. 1882-22
SCH 2023110185
Lead Agency:
City of Orange
Community Development Department • Planning Division
300 East Chapman Avenue
Orange, CA 92866-1591
(714) 744 - 7220
(714) 744 - 7222 (Fax)
www.cityoforange.org
Prepared by:
Carlson Strategic Land Solutions
27134A Paseo Espada, Suite 323
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
(949) 542 - 7043
Date:
March 5, 2024
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1.0 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Section 2.0 Response to Comments ..................................................................................................... 1
2.1 General Response 1 – Traffic and Parking ................................................................................ 3
2.2 General Response 2 – Privacy, Light, and Shade/Shadow ........................................................ 6
2.3 Response to Comments .............................................................................................................. 8 Section 3.0 Revisions to the Draft IS/MND .................................................................................... 136
3.1 Updates and Corrections to the Draft IS/MND ...................................................................... 136
APPENDICES
Attachment A Supplemental VMT Analysis
Attachment B Shade/Shadow Analysis (Sheets L7-L8)
Attachment C Shade/Shadow Analysis (Sheet L35)
Attachment D Photometric Analysis
Attachment E Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Attachment F Draft IS/MND
Attachment G Draft IS/MND Appendices
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 1 SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
This Final Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (Final IS/MND) has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as amended (Public Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq.) and CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations §§ 15000 et seq.).
This document contains responses to comments received on the Draft IS/MND No. 1882-22 for the 901 E. Katella Residential Development Project (Project) (State Clearinghouse No. 2023110185) during the public review period, which occurred November 9, 2023, through December 11, 2023. This document has been prepared in accordance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines and represents the independent judgment of the Lead Agency. This document and the circulated Draft IS/MND comprise the Final IS/MND. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Pro gram (MMRP) incorporates commitments in the form of Project Design Features (PDFs) and Mitigation Measures to ensure implementation. The MMRP is included as Attachment E.
The Draft IS/MND No. 1882-22 for the 901 E. Katella Residential Development Project (Project) (State Clearinghouse No. 2023110185) is hereby incorporated by reference, in its entirety. The Draft IS/MND is available for review at the Orange City Hall, Offices of the City Clerk and Community Development Department, 300 East Chapman Avenue, Orange, CA 92866, on the City’s website at https://www.cityoforange.org/our-city/departments/community- development/planning-division/current- projects, and included as Attachment F to this document. The technical appendices to the Draft IS/MND are included as Attachment G.
The City published a Notice of Intent and circulated a Draft IS/MND for public review and comment for the period of November 9, 2023 , through December 11, 2023. A tot al of 37 corr espondences were submitted to the City during the review period. Section 2 of the Final IS/MND includes a list of all correspondence submitted to the City on the Draft IS/MND, each identified by a number for later reference, together with the authors and the dates the letters were received. Following this list, all of the letters are presented, with numbered brackets to highlight specific comments that are responded to in the next section.
SECTION 2.0 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
This Final IS/MND has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as amended (Public Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq.) and CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations §§ 15000 et seq.).
Comment letters and specific comments are given letters and numb ers for reference purposes. Where sections of the Draft IS/MND are excerpted in this document, the sections are shown indented. Changes to the Draft IS/MND text are shown in underlined bold text for additions and strikeout for deletions.
The following is a list of agencies and persons who submitted comments on the Draft IS/MND during the public review period.
This section provides all written responses received on the Draft IS/MND and the City’s responses to each comment.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 2 Number
Reference Commenting Person/Agency Date of Comment
Agency Comment Letter
A-1 Caltrans December 11, 2023
Individual Comment Letter
1 Jay Chaisson November 11, 2023
2 Dan Graupensperger November 15, 2023
3 Joseph and Zeina Fierro November 26, 2023
4 Rosalie Huynh November 28, 2023
5 James Garaghty November 28, 2023
6 Schoen Tucker November 28, 2023
7 David Nelson November 28, 2023
8 Jamie Fingal November 29, 2023
9 Kevin Tong November 29, 2023
10 Jenny Tom November 29, 2023
11 Timothy Chi Ngo November 30, 2023
12 David and Linda Crawford November 30, 2023
13 Denise Floryan November 30, 2023
14 Alex Martin December 1, 2023
15 Joann Jeon December 2, 2023
16 Amy Moen December 2, 2023
17 Karen Goran December 3, 2023
18 Hung Doan December 3, 2023
19 Kevin O’Connor December 4, 2023
20 Adam Le December 4, 2023
21 Carolyn Jones December 4, 2023
22 Jeffrey Jones December 4, 2023
23 Kendall Jones December 4, 2023
24 Laurence Hamlin December 4, 2023
25 Stephen and Kristina Reifenstein December 4, 2023
26 Todd and Brittany Calvert December 4, 2023
27 Betty and Bill Bath December 5, 2023
28 Eduardo Esquivel December 5, 2023
29 Mai Vu December 5, 2023
30 Mika Jones December 5, 2023
31 Katherine Gernak December 5, 2023
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 3 Number
Reference Commenting Person/Agency Date of Comment
32 Al Tucker December 5, 2023
33 Jeremy Campadonia December 6, 2023
34 Melissa Campitelli December 6, 2023
35 Janet Majick December 6, 2023
36 Pamela Dittrich December 6, 2023
2.1 General Response 1 – Traffic and Parking
Many of the comment letters received on the Draft IS/MND include one or more comments pertaining to traffic congestion, sight distance and turning movements, parking, and vehicle miles travelled. Instead of repeating responses, one comprehensive response to these related topics is provided.
In 2013, the State Legislature signed into law Senate Bill 743, which changed the requirements for analyzing traffic pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). SB 743 requires CEQA documents to analyze vehicle miles travelled (VMT) instead of auto delay at intersections or similar measurements of traffic congestion. In response to SB 743, the City of Orange adopted guidelines for preparing traffic studies. The guidelines, titled Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment (TIAG), were adopted in July 2020. These guidelines require Applicants prepare a traffic study that includes both VMT analysis and traffic congestion analysis.
Numerous comments suggested the traffic study for the Project was inappropriately prepared in 2020, in the middle of Covid. These comments are incorrect. The traff ic study for the Project was prepared October 2022, and unaffected by Covid as explained later in this response. The City’s traffic guidelines were prepared in 2020 during the time of Covid.
The first step in preparing the traffic congestion analysis is t o determine the number of trips generated by the Project. Trip generation is not based on the number of bedrooms or number of new residents.
Instead, trip generation relies on the number of average daily trips per dwelling unit as determined by the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE). The average daily trips account for a wide variety of vehicle trips, such as work trips, school trips, landscaping, delivery trucks, etc. By applying the trip generation rates from ITE as outlined in the trip generation analy sis included in Appendix K, the Project would generate 353 vehicle trips in a 24 -hour period, with 24 trips during the morning (AM) peak one -hour period and 28 trips during the afternoon (PM) peak one-hour period. The City’s traffic study guidelines state that a more detailed traffic analysis is only required when a project generates 51 or more peak hour trips. Since the proposed Project generates much less than 51 peak hour trips, no further traffic study is required and for the con gestion portion of the analysis, impacts were determined to be less than significant.
The trip generation analysis prepared in October 2022 was unaffected by Covid because the study relies on trip generation factors prepared by the Institute of Traffic Engineers, which has been compiling traffic data for decades. The study did not rely on any intersection counts or traffic patterns that could have been affected by Covid.
To put the trip generation numbers into perspective, the existing commercial zoning o n the Project site would allow for general office, medical office, or retail uses, which have different trip generation rates City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 4 based on the amount of building square footage. The following comparison relies on the amount of square footage of the existing bu ilding on the Project site, which is approximately 20,621 square feet.
The following table compares trip generation rates between general office, medical office, retail, and the proposed Project.
Table 1: Trip Generation Comparison
Use Average Daily Trips AM Peak Hour
Trips
PM Peak Hour
Trips
General Office 224 31 30
Medical Office 742 64 81
Retail 1,123 49 136
Proposed Project 353 24 28
Source: 2021 ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition)
As shown in Table 1, the proposed Project generates fewer AM and PM Peak Hour trips than other uses permitted by the current zoning.
The Draft IS/MND also includes a sight distance analysis prepared May 30, 2023, and included as Appendix L. The sight distance analysis analyzed the turning movements into and from the Project site from the driveway on Cambridge Street. The study takes into consideration sight distance and vehicle speeds. Speed count data was collected on Cambridge Street on July 12, 2022. The study concluded that sufficient stopping sight distance exists for outbound (leaving the Projec t site) left turn and right turn movements. Therefore, there are no restrictions on outbound turning movements. However, the study determined that insufficient stopping sight distance is available for southbound Cambridge Street left turn movements into th e Project. Therefore, Mitigation Measure MM TRANS -1 was included in the Draft IS/MND to restrict southbound left turns into the Project.
Many comments focused on the difficulty for existing residents making a left turn onto southbound Cambridge Street from East Carleton. That turning movement and the sight distance associated with that turning movement is an existing condition, which occurs with or without the proposed Project. Because that condition is existing and the Project has no ability to affect or revise that intersection, no further sight distance of that intersection was prepared.
The proposed Project generates 24 to 28 peak hour trips during the AM and PM peak hour periods, respectively, and 353 daily vehicle trips over a 24 -hour period. The Project site has two driveways and traffic will disburse in multiple directions from those driveways. Therefore, not all Project vehicle trips would occur northbound on Cambridge Drive and impact turning movements from East Carleton.
Cambridge Drive is designated as a secondary arterial roadway. According to the City’s Circulation and Mobility Element of the General Plan, secondary arterials have a daily capacity of up to 24,000 vehicle trips1. The City conducts traffic counts approximately every two years . According to the City’s 2020 traffic counts, Cambridge Street between Katella and Taft Avenue had 6,700 average daily trips (ADT).
This count would have been affected by Covid. The counts in 2016 showed 9,400 ADT and in 2018 9,800 ADT, which more closely approximate current traffic volumes. Based on traffic volumes of around 10,000 ADT and a roadway capacity of 24,000 ADT, the roadway has sufficient design capacity to accommodate the additional 353 ADT produced by the Project.
1 City of Orange General Plan Circulation and Mobility Element, Table CM -3, Page CM-13 City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 5 Therefore, the additional traffic generated by the proposed Project is 1) less than the threshold established by the City for further study, 2) a fraction of the total number of existing (non -Project) trips on Cambridge Street, and 3) a very small percentage of the overall design cap acity of Cambridge Street.
The traffic concerns expressed by the residents are recognized, however, the existing traffic conditions at East Carleton were not caused by the Project and the Project would not change or substantially exacerbate the existing tr affic conditions. Therefore, under the thresholds established by CEQA, the Project would not cause a significant traffic impact.
Numerous comments also expressed concern about the amount of parking provided by the Project.
Parking is provided in enclosed garages and open guest parking spaces. The City of Orange Municipal Code requires a total of 128 parking spaces. This calculation is based on 2 spaces for each 3 -bedroom unit, 3 spaces for each 4 -bedroom unit, and 0.25 spaces for each dwelling unit. The pr oposed Project provides 128 parking spaces. Each dwelling unit includes a two -car enclosed garage and 30 uncovered guest parking spaces are provided.
Parking is not an environmental topic specifically included in State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, therefore, the Draft IS/MND does not include a parking study or specific parking analysis. The Land Use Section (Appendix G, XI (b)) of the CEQA Guidelines establishes a threshold of significance pertaining to consistency with adopted policies or regulations (cod es), which could include the parking code if an inconsistency would cause an environmental impact. Since the proposed parking provided by the Project is consistent with City code requirements, the Project is consistent with adopted parking regulations and therefore no impact would occur.
The VMT analysis for the proposed Project (RK October 2022) relied on the North Orange County Collaborative VMT Traffic Study Screening Tool (NOCC+) to evaluate vehicle miles generated by the Project. This analysis conclud ed that Project generated VMT per service population (15.4 VMT per service population) would not exceed the City of Orange General Plan Build Out Baseline VMT per service population threshold (31.3 VMT per service population).
To confirm the conclusion from the NOCC+ screening tool, a supplemental VMT analysis was prepared by RK Engineering Group ( Attachment A) that includes a full model run of the Orange County Transportation Analysis Model (OCTAM). The OCTAM Model run determined that the City of Orange has a General Plan Build-Out (Year 2030) VMT per service population of 28.3. This VMT per service population represents one of the thresholds of significance for determining Project impacts. The OCTAM model run for the proposed Project determined that for the Base Model Year (2016) with Project the VMT per service population would be 15.4. For the Cumulative Model Year (2045) with Project the VMT per service population would be 15.2. In both model year runs, the proposed Project would not exceed the City’s threshold of significance of 28.3 VMT per service population. A second threshold of significance pertains to whether the baseline or cumulative project -generated VMT per service population would increase under the plus project condition compared t o the no project condition. The OCTAM model run determined that in the 2016 base model year, the Project would reduce VMT
0.025%. In the 2045 cumulative model year, the Project would reduce VMT 0.0 34%. Therefore, the Project would not cause a n increase in citywide VMT per service population. The supplemental VMT analysis confirmed the conclusions derived from the NOCC+ screening tool and no changes to the conclusions presented in the Draft IS/MND would occur.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 6
2.2 General Response 2 – Privacy, Light, and Shade/Shadow Many of the comment letters received on the Draft IS/MND include one or more comments pertaining to privacy, light, and shade/shadow concerns. Since these are related topics, instead of repeating responses, one comprehensive response to these related topics is provided.
Many of the comments have expressed concern about the loss of privacy and shading due to a 10 -foot setback from the northern Project boundary and two and three-story homes, some with roof decks.
This response first addre sses the thresholds of significance established by CEQA and the City for the topics of privacy and shading. Second, this response addresses the change in zoning from C -P to R -3 with application of the Small Lot Subdivision Ordinance development standards. Lastly, this response provides analysis of shading from the proposed Project compared to the existing condition.
Thresholds of Significance
Cities establish thresholds of significance to determine whether an impact is significant or less than significant. Often cities rely on the checklist in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines to establish the thresholds of significance. Cities can also adopt thresholds of significance through the adoption of local CEQA Guidelines.
For the topic of privacy, the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G does not establish thresholds of significance for privacy impacts. First, privacy is subjective and second it has not been determined to be an environmental impact analyzed pursuant to CEQA. Additionally, the City of Orange has not adopted thresholds of significance for privacy in locally adopted CEQA guidelines or in the municipal code. The CEQA Guidelines addresses impacts to aesthetic resources, such as scenic resources and scenic vistas, but not privacy. Furthermo re, private views are not protected by CEQA or California law. Therefore, privacy is not an environmental impact analyzed under CEQA.
Shading and shadowing can be a potential impact when a building(s) blocks sunlight from neighboring properties, including roof-top solar. The CEQA Guidelines have not established shade/shadow thresholds of significance, nor has the City of Orange formally adopted code standards or thresholds of significance as part of the City’s local CEQA Guidelines. While not a formally ad opted threshold of significance, the City’s past practice has been that new shading from a project should not continuously cover either rooftop solar panels or residential windows for a two-hour period between 7:30 am and 9:30 am. The City uses the winter solstice for the analysis because the sun angle is lowest on that day, resulting in the most restrictive condition of the year. The spring and fall equinox and summer solstice may also be analyzed, but are not required, for this Project because the sun ang le is much higher during those times of year, resulting in less shading.
Light and glare are topics addressed by CEQA in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. Appendix G states:
Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
This question in Appendix G is often used as a threshold of significance for light and glare impacts.
Change in Development Standards
The Project proposes a zone change from a commercial zone (C -P) to a residential zone (R-3) with the application of the Small Lot Subdivision Ordinance development standards. While CEQA does not City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 7 establish thresholds of significance for privacy or shading, it is important to consider whether the change in zoning, and ther efore a change in development standards, would have a substantial effect on surrounding land uses.
The two development standards that most affect the adjoining residential properties on E. Carleton Avenue are the setback from the northern Project property boundary and the height limit.
The existing C-P zone requires a setback of 0 -feet along the northern Project property boundary and a height limit of 32 feet. Therefore, a commercial developer could build a 32 -foot-tall office building or other commercial structure 0 feet from the northern Project property boundary without the need for discretionary City approval (called “by right”) because the commercial use and structure would be consistent with existing zoning standards.
The proposed Project requests a zone change to R-3 with the application of the Small Lot development standards. The Small Lot development standards require a 5 -foot setback along the northern Project property boundary and a 35 -foot height limit. Therefore, the zone change would increase the setback standard from the northern property boundary and allow for an increase in height by 3 feet.
However, for the proposed Project, the Applicant has restricted the building height for the first row of residential units to two-stories and increased the setback of the second story for these units. The proposed two-story structures measure approximately 20 feet to the eave and 24.5 feet overall height, and the second story of those residential units would be setback an additional 2 - 5 feet, for a total second story setback between 12 and 15 feet from the northern property boundary. Therefore, the Project would result in the height of the structures being approximately seven (7) feet lower than permitted in the C -P zone and setback 10 feet and more tha n permitted in the C -P zone. That two -story height restriction and additional second story setback for the northern -most row of residences would be governed by the Design Review approval and conditions of approval.
Therefore, the proposed change in zone a nd development standards would not cause an adverse effect on surrounding land uses and furthermore, the restrictions placed on the proposed Project would be more restrictive and have less effect on surrounding land uses than the commercial development that could be built “by right” under the existing C-P zoning standards.
Shade / Shadow Analysis
While neither the CEQA Guidelines nor the City of Orange have established thresholds for significance for shading, the City’s past practice has been that new shad ing from a project should not continuously cover either rooftop solar panels or windows for a two -hour period between 7:30 am and 9:30 am. The City uses the winter solstice for the analysis because the sun angle is lowest on that day, resulting in the most restrictive condition.
Two of the technical components of this analysis are the azimuth of the sun, which is the location of the sun in degrees from north, and the sun angle elevation. Both of these components were used in the shading analysis during the winter solstice at the latitude and longitude of the Project site.
Attachment B (sheets L7-L8) provides a shade analysis during the winter solstice from 7:00 to 9:30 am in both the existing condition and the proposed condition. This analysis was done from overhead, in the 9:30 am condition, a yellow line marks the limits of shading. In all but two locations, 932 and 942 E.
Carleton Avenue, Project shading is absent from the residential structures along E. Carleton Avenue by 9:30 a.m.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 8
Further analysis of both 932 and 942 E. Carleton Avenue was performed to determine the change between existing and proposed conditions. Additional analysis and modeling were necessary because of the existing vegetation both on the Project site as well as on each individual property. The analysis, included in Attachment C (sheet L35), is shown at an angle, which allows for the relationship between the existing landscape and the residential structures to be clearly seen. The analysis shows that the proposed Project would not create new shading impacts beyond what occurs during the existing condition on the winter solstice due to existing vegetation on the Project site and on each private property.
It is important to further note that the shading impacts from the proposed Project are less than what could occur “by right” under existing zoning. The existing zoning permits a 32-foot-tall commercial structure located where the Project proposes structures less than 25 feet tall. The additional seven (7) feet in building height permitted under the existing zoning would increase the shading of the residential properties along E. Carleton compared to the proposed Project.
Light and Glare
The CEQA Guidelines has identified projects that create “a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area” as causing a significant impact. The proposed Project includes residential lighting, consis tent with the lighting found in the E. Carleton Avenue neighborhood and generally less intensive than commercial lighting that could be found in the C-P zone.
Therefore, the lighting associated with the proposed residential neighborhood is not considered a source of substantial light. To further document this conclusion, a photometric analysis was prepared to show footcandles and light spillage from the light sources proposed on the Project site. The photometric analysis is included as Attachment D to this document. Furthermore, the Project does not include an architectural style with reflective glass windows often found in commercial buildings that could cause glare impacts.
2.3 Response to Comments
The following are specific responses to comments received during the public review period.
The rest of the page intentionally left blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 9 Agency Comment Letter A-1 − Caltrans (December 11, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 10
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 11
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 12
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 13 Agency Response A-1 − Caltrans (December 11, 2023)
A1-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
A1-2 The comment expresses support for affordable housing and meeting the RHNA allocation. The Project site is not identified in the City’s Housing Element for production of affordable housing and the City has iden tified other candidate sites to meet its RHNA allocation.
A1-3 The comment suggests adding a discussion of racial equity into the ISMND. The City fully supports racial equity; however, this project does not create an environmental justice issue and therefo re, racial equity is not an environmental topic of concern in the ISMND.
A1-4 The comment encourages the use of Complete Streets, which is noted. The proposed Project does not include off -site roadway improvements and does not have the ability to convert off-site roadways into Complete Streets.
A1-5 The comment suggests supporting Active Transportation and transit users. The Project is located near commercial uses and bus stops, both of which encourage Active Transportation and transit use.
A1-6 The comment encourages promoting multimodal transportation. The Project is located near commercial uses and bus stops. Pedestrian access from the Project site to existing sidewalks would be provided. No other off-site roadway improvements are part of the Project.
A1-7 The comment encourages the use of Complete Streets, which is noted. The proposed Project does not include off -site roadway improvements and does not have the ability to convert off-site roadways into Complete Streets.
A1-8 The comment suggests ad ding dedicated bicycle infrastructure to E. Katella Avenue. The comment is noted, but beyond the scope of the Project. The proposed Project does not include off -site roadway improvements and does not have the ability to add off-site bicycle lanes to E. Katella Avenue.
A1-9 The comment requests appropriate detours, signage, and safety measures for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users. Any work done within public right-of-way is required to have appropriate detours, signage, and/or safety measures in accordance with the City’s encroachment permit procedures.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 14 A1-10 The comment requests identification of bus service and connectivity to train stations. The Project site is located approximately 2.3 miles east of the ARTIC Station and 2.4 miles north of the Orange Station. OCTA Bus Route 50 provides east/west transit along Katella, including transit to the ARCTIC Station. OCTA Bus Route 71provides north/south transit along Tustin Avenue, just east of the Project site, and Bus Route 59 provides north/south tra nsit along Glassell just west of the Project site.
A1-11 The comment requests incentivizing the use of transit for construction workers. The comment is noted and will be considered as a condition of approval. No significant impacts were identified triggering the need for this suggestion to be included as a mitigation measure.
A1-12 The comment requests consideration of shared drop -off locations for delivery trucks. The comment is beyond the scope of the Project and the ISMND.
A1-13 The comment pertains to o n-street truck parking. No on -street truck parking is permitted within the Project site and no parking is permitted on surrounding arterial roadways.
A1-14 The comment pertains to trip generation. Please refer to General Response 1.
Remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 15 Individual Comment Letter 1 − Jay Chaisson (November 14, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 16 Individual Response 1 − Jay Chaisson (November 14, 2023) 1 - 1 The comment suggests that Cambridge Street between Katella and Chestnut is a dangerous street and crossing the street is dangerous due to the steady stream of traffic. It is unclear whether the Commenter is describing crossing Cambridge Street at a designated crosswalk or at an unmarked location. Please refer to General Response 1.
1 - 2 The comment questions why four -way stop control is provided at the intersection of Palmyra and Shaffer. The rationale for the intersection control is beyond the scope of this environmental document.
1 - 3 The comment requests mitigation to prevent traffic exiting the Project site from being “forced onto other side streets.” The proposed Project has two points of access, one connection to Cambridge Street and another connect ion to E. Katella.
Cambridge Street and E. Katella are both classified as arterial roadways, not side streets. Please refer to General Response 1.
1 - 4 The comment expresses concern about Project traffic turning left during times of high traffic volume. I t is unclear from the comment, what left turn is being referenced. Please refer to General Response 1.
Remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 17 Individual Comment Letter 2 − Dan Graupensperger (November 15, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 18 Individual Response 2 − Dan Graupensperger (November 15, 2023) 2-1 The comment suggests the proposed parking is inadequate. Please refer to General Response 1.
2-2 The comment suggests the street widths will be tight for a fire engine and tiller truck. The street widths have been reviewed by both the City engineering and fire departments and deemed to meet requirements.
Remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 19 Individual Comment Letter 3 − Joseph and Zeina Fierro (November 26, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 20 Individual Response 3 − Joseph and Zeina Fierro (November 26, 2023) 3-1 The comment suggests the proposed parking is inadequate. Please refer to General Response 1.
3-2 The comment pertains to concerns about traffic impacts. Please refer to General Response 1.
3-3 The comment suggests that more traffic will result in noise impacts. The additional traffic generated by the Project was analyzed in a Noise Study included in Appendix I and summarized on Page 70 of the Draft IS/MND. The noise study determined the increase in vehicle and mechanical noise from the Project would be less than 3 dBA, which is the limit of detection by the human ear (see Draft IS/MND Page 70).
Therefore, no significant noise impacts would occur from the proposed Project. 3-4 The comment pertains to the style (architecture) of the proposed buildings. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. The City has a detailed Design Review process, which addresses architectural styles. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
3-5 The comment suggests that the Project will lower the value of the Commenter’s home. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since th is comment does not raise an i ssue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
3-6 The comment provides the Commenter’s opinions on the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 21 Individual Comment Letter 4 − Rosalie Huynh (November 28, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 22
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 23
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 24 Individual Response 4 − Rosalie Huynh (November 28, 2023) 4-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 4-2 The comment suggests the Project would cause noise and light pollution. A Noise Study was prepared to analyze noise impacts from the proposed Project. This study is included in Appendix I and summari zed on Page 70 of the Draft IS/MND. The noise study determined the increase in vehicle and mechanical noise from the Project would be less than 3 dBA, which is the limit of detection by the human ear (see Draft IS/MND Page 70). Therefore, no significant noise impacts would occur from the proposed Project.
Residential homes create new sources of light or glare, however the new light sources would have the same character and intensity as the existing surrounding light sources in the residential neighborhood to the north and lower intensity than the existing surrounding commercial light sources (see Draft IS/MND Page 24).
Therefore, no significant impacts would occur from new light sources. Please refer to General Response 2.
4-3 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 4-4 The comment suggests the proposed parking is inadequate. Please refer to General Response 1.
4-5 The comment pertains to loss of privacy. Please refer to General Response 2. 4-6 The comment suggests that the Project is inconsistent with General Plan policies
1.4, 1.6, and 6.10. Policies 1.4 and 1.6 pertain to design and privacy. Please refer to General Response 2 . Policy 6.10 states that impacts to air, noise, circulation should be mitigated through the use of sound walls, landscape buffers, speed limits, and other traffic control measures. The Draft IS/MND analyzed impacts to Air Quality (Section 5.3, Page 28), Noise (Section 5.13, Page 67) and Transportation/Traffic (Section 5.17, Page 81). The Draft IS/MND determined that no significant impacts and no mitigation measures are required for Air Quality and Noise impacts. The Draft IS/MND determined that the proposed Project would not cause a traffic impact to surrounding streets or inter sections with implementation of one mitigation measure. Please refer to General Response 1.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 25 Individual Comment Letter 5 − James Garaghty (November 28, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 26
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 27 Individual Response 5 − James Garaghty (November 28, 2023) 5-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 5-2 The comment suggests the Project would cause noise and light pollution. A Noise Study was prepared to analyze noise impacts from the proposed Project. This study is included in Appendix I and summari zed on Page 70 of the Draft IS/MND. The noise study determined the increase in vehicle and mechanical noise from the Project would be less than 3 dBA, which is the limit of detection by the human ear (see Draft IS/MND Page 70). Therefore, no significant noise impacts would occur from the proposed Project.
Residential homes create new sources of light or glare, however the new light sources would have the same character and intensity as the existing surrounding light sources in the residential neighborhood to the north and lower intensity than the existing surrounding commercial light sources (see Draft IS/MND Page 24).
Therefore, no significant impacts would occur from new light sources. Please refer to General Response 2.
5-3 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 5-4 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opinion about preventing a small lot subdivision from being allowed next to R-1 zoning anywhere in the City. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 28 Individual Comment Letter 6 − Schoen Tucker (November 28, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 29 Individual Response 6 − Schoen Tucker (November 28, 2023) 6-1 The comment includes questions about public notification. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
6-2 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 6-3 The comment suggests that housing is not appropriate on the Project site. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 30 Individual Comment Letter 7 − David Nelson (November 28, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 31
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 32 Individual Response 7 − David Nelson (November 28, 2023) 7-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 7-2 The comment pertains to loss of privacy. Please refer to General Response 2. 7-3 The comment suggests the proposed parking is inadequate and parking was not address in the Draft IS/MND. Please refer to General Response 1. 7-4 The comment questions the use of 3 persons per dwelling unit in the Draft IS/MND.
As stated in Section 5.14, Population and Housing, on Page 73 of the Draft IS/MND, the average household size in the City of Orange is 3.03 persons per household. Footnote Number 2 on Page 73 explains that this figure was obtained from the 2022 American Community Survey, prepared by the United States Census. The footnote also indicates that the 2022 figure is slightly lower than the 2019 figure used in the City’s Housing Element of 3.18 average persons per household.
7-5 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 33 Individual Comment Letter 8 − Jamie Fingal (November 29, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 34 Individual Response 8 − Jamie Fingal (November 29, 2023) 8-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 8-2 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 35 Individual Comment Letter 9 − Kevin Tong (November 29, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 36 Individual Response 9 − Kevin Tong (November 29, 2023) 9-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 9-2 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project and focuses on parking concerns. Please refer to General Response 1.
9-3 The comment pertains to traffic concerns. Please refer to General Response 1. 9-4 The comment pertains to loss of privacy. Please refer to General Response 2. 9-5 The comment generally expresses opposition to the Project, but also references impacts to traffic, parking, privacy, lighting, and noise. For traffic and parking concerns, p lease refer to General Response 1 . A Noise Study was prepared to analyze noise impacts from the proposed Project. This study is included in Appendix I and summarized on Page 70 of the Draft IS/MND. The noise study determined the increase in vehicle and mechanical noise from the Project would be less than 3 dBA, which is the limit of detection by the human ear (see Draft IS/MND
Project.
Residential homes create new sources of light or glare, however the new light sources would have the same chara cter and intensity as the existing surrounding light sources in the residential neighborhood to the north and lower intensity than the existing surrounding commercial light sources (see Draft IS/MND Page 24).
Therefore, no significant impacts would occur from new light sources. Please refer to General Response 2.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 37 Individual Comment Letter 10 − Jenny Tom (November 29, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 38
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 39 Individual Response 10 − Jenny Tom (November 29, 2023) 10-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 10-2 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
10-3 The comment pertains to traffic concerns. Please refer to General Response 1. 10-4 The comment suggests that the traffic study was prepared during Covid. Please refer to General Response 1.
10-5 The comment expresses concern about parking. Please refer to General Response
1. 10-6 The comment expresses concern about noise and light pollution as well as privacy.
A Noise Study was prepared to analyze noise impacts from the proposed Project.
This study is included in Appendix I and summarized on Page 70 of the Draft IS/MND. The noise study determined the increase in vehicle and mechanical noise from the Project would be less than 3 dBA, which is the limit of detection by the human ear (see Draft IS/MND Page 70). Therefore, no significant noise impacts would occur from the proposed Project.
Please refer to General Response 2.
10-7 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 40 Individual Comment Letter 11 − Timothy Chi Ngo (November 30, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 41
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 42 Individual Response 11 − Timothy Chi Ngo (November 30, 2023) 11-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 11-2 The comment suggests the parcel size is too small to build 49 units. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
11-3 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 11-4 The comment pertains to parking concerns. Please refer to General Response 1. 11-5 The comment expresses concern that the project site is not suitable for residential development. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 11-6 The comment suggests the Project will be a burden on the Orange Police Department. The potential impacts on Public Services, including the Orange Police Department was analyzed in Section 5.15 of the Draft IS/MND (see Page 76). The analysis determined that the proposed Project would not cause a significant impact to the Orange Police Department or require any additional staffing. 11-7 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opinion about preventing a small lot subdivision from being allowed next to R-1 zoning anywhere in the City. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 43 Individual Comment Letter 12 − David and Linda Crawford (November 30, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 44 Individual Response 12 − David and Linda Crawford (November 30, 2023) 12-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 12-2 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 12-3 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 12-4 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 45 Individual Comment Letter 13 − Denise Floryan (November 30, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 46 Individual Response 13 − Denise Floryan (November 30, 2023) 13-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 13-2 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 13-3 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 13-4 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 47 Individual Comment Letter 14 − Alex Martin (December 1, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 48
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 49 Individual Response 14 − Alex Martin (December 1, 2023) 14-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 14-2 The comment expresses concerns about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 14-3 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 14-4 The comment pertains to parking concerns. Please refer to General Response 1. 14-5 The comment expresses concerns about compatibility. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
14-6 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
14-7 The comment suggests that the Project will lower the value of the Commenter’s home. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
14-8 The comment suggests that the Project is inconsistent with General Plan policies
1.4, 1.6, and 6.10. Policies 1.4 and 1.6 pertain to design and privacy. Please refer to General Response 2 . Policy 6.10 states that impacts to air, noise, circulation should be mitigated through the use of sound walls, landscape buffers, speed limits, and other traffic control measures. The Draft IS/MND analyzed impacts to Air Quality (Section 5.3, Page 28), N oise (Section 5.13, Page 67) and Transportation/Traffic (Section 5.17, Page 81). The Draft IS/MND determined that no significant impacts and no mitigation measures are required for Air Quality and Noise impacts. The Draft IS/MND determined that the proposed Project would not cause a traffic impact to surrounding streets or intersections with implementation of one mitigation measure. Please refer to General Response 1. 14-9 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 50 Individual Comment Letter 15 − Joann Jeon (December 2, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 51 Individual Response 15 − Joann Jeon (December 2, 2023) 15-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 15-2 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 15-3 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 15-4 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opinion about preventing a small lot subdivision from being allowed next to R-1 zoning anywhere in the City. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 52 Individual Comment Letter 16 − Amy Moen (December 2, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 53
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 54 Individual Response 16 − Amy Moen (December 2, 2023)
16-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 16-2 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 16-3 The comment expresses concern about parking. Please refer to General Response
1. 16-4 The comment suggests that HOAs can change rules after the CC&Rs are recorded.
Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
16-5 The comment suggests that the Project will lower the value of the C ommenter’s home. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
16-6 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 16-7 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 55 Individual Comment Letter 17 − Karen Goran (December 3, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 56 Individual Response 17 − Karen Goran (December 3, 2023) 17-1 The comment expresses concern about parking. Please refer to General Response
1. 17-2 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 17-3 The comment suggests that the Project will lower the value of the Commenter’s home. This topic i s beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
17-4 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 57 Individual Comment Letter 18 − Hung Doan (December 3, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 58 Individual Response 18 − Hung Doan (December 3, 2023)
18-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 18-2 The comment references three topics, privacy, noise, and light pollution. Regarding privacy and light pollution concerns, please refer to General Response 2 .
Regarding noise, a Noise Study was prepared to anal yze noise impacts from the proposed Project. This study is included in Appendix I and summarized on Page 70 of the Draft IS/MND. The noise study determined the increase in vehicle and mechanical noise from the Project would be less than 3 dBA, which is the limit of detection by the human ear (see Draft IS/MND Page 70). Therefore, no significant noise impacts would occur from the proposed Project.
18-3 The comment references concern over traffic, noise, blocked views, privacy, parking, and devaluation of property values. Please see Response to Comment 18- 2 regarding noise. Please refer to General Response 1 regarding traffic and parking concerns. Please refer to General Response 2 regarding privacy concerns.
Regarding views, there are no scenic resources or scenic vistas on the Project site or within its vicinity. Please see Draft IS/MND Section 5.1 (page 21) for further information on aesthetic impacts. Furthermore, private views are not protected.
Lastly, the comment suggests that the Project will lower the value of the Commenter’s home. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
18-4 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 18-5 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opinion about preventing a small lot subdivision from being allowed next to R-1 zoning anywhere in the City. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of t he Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 59 Individual Comment Letter 19 − Kevin O’Connor (December 4, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 60 Individual Response 19 − Kevin O’Connor (December 4, 2023) 19-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 19-2 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
19-3 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 19-4 The comment expresses concern about parking. Please refer to General Response
1. 19-5 The comment expresses concern about Chapman univer sity students overpopulating the dwellings and having large parties. The City’s Municipal Code provides an enforcement mechanism to regulate large parties and noise events.
Furthermore, the future Homeowners Association has the ability to enforce Codes, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) that generally also address parties and overcrowding. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 19-6 The comment states that the Pro ject would have a high skyline and impact the beauty of the area. The proposed Project would be subject to the small lot subdivision ordinance height limit of 35 feet. The existing E. Carleton neighborhood has a height limit of 32 feet, as does the existin g C-P zoning on the Project site. Therefore, the proposed Project would not substantially change the permitted height. Please refer to General Response 2 for more information.
Additionally, there are no scenic resources or scenic vistas on the Project site or within its vicinity. Please see Draft IS/MND Section 5.1 (page 21) for further information on aesthetic impacts.
19-7 The comment provides a suggestion to add more parks and trails within the vicinity of the Project site. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 61 Individual Comment Letter 20 − Adam Le (December 4, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 62
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 63
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 64 Individual Response 20 − Adam Le (December 4, 2023)
20-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 20-2 The comment suggests that the Project is inconsistent with General Plan policies
1.4, 1.6, and 6.10. Policies 1.4 and 1.6 pertain to design and privacy. Ple ase refer to General Response 2 . Policy 6.10 states that impacts to air, noise, circulation should be mitigated through the use of sound walls, landscape buffers, speed limits, and other traffic control measures. The Draft IS/MND analyzed impacts to Air Quality (Section 5.3, Page 28), Noise (Section 5.13, Page 67) and Transportation/Traffic (Section 5.17, Page 81). The Draft IS/MND determined that no significant impacts and no mitigation measures are required for Air Quality and Noise impacts. The Draft IS/MND determined that the proposed Project would not cause a traffic impact to surrounding streets or intersections with implementation of one mitigation measure. Please refer to General Response 1. 20-3 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 20-4 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 65 Individual Comment Letter 21 − Carolyn Jones (December 4, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 66
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 67
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 68 Individual Response 21 − Carolyn Jones (December 4, 2023) 21-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 21-2 The comment provides the Commenter’s opinion. Since th is comment do es not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
21-3 The comment expresses concern about privacy, light, and noise. Regarding privacy and light, please refer to General Response 2. Regarding noise, a Noise Study was prepared to analyze noise impacts from the proposed Project. This study is included in Appendix I and summarized on Page 70 of the Draft IS/MND. The noise study determined the increase in vehicle and mechanical noise from the Project would be less than 3 dBA, which is the limit of detection by the human ear (see Draft IS/MND
Project.
21-4 The comment expresses concern about neighborhood integrity and zonin g. Draft IS/MND Section 5.11 (page 63) addresses potential land use impacts. The proposed Project will not physically divide an established community. Furthermore, the proposed Project does not conflict with land use plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding an environmental effect, or that result in a significant impact.
21-5 The comment suggests that existing infrastructure (public services) is unable to handle the proposed Project. Draft IS/MND Section 5.15 (page 75) analyzes impacts to public services including fire, police, schools, parks, and other public services. The analysis determined that no significant impacts would occur. Orange Police and Fire Departments have reviewed the Project, provided comments, and determined that the Project would not adversely affect response times or services. 21-6 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 21-7 The comment suggests that the Project will lower the value of the Commenter’s home. This topic is beyond th e scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
21-8 The comment expresses concern about shadowing solar panels on existing properties. The top ic of shade and shadow impacts is addressed in General Response 2.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 69 21-9 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 21-10 The comment expresses concern about parking. Please refer to General Response
1. 21-11 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 21-12 The comment expresses concern over community character and aesthetic impacts.
There are no scenic resources or scenic vistas on the Project site or within its vicinity. Please see Draft IS/MND Section 5.1 (page 21) for further information on aesthetic impacts. The comment may also be referring to the architecture of the proposed buildings. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. The City has a detailed Design Review proce ss, which addresses architectural styles. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
21-13 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 70 Individual Comment Letter 22 − Jeffrey Jones (December 4, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 71
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 72
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 73 Individual Response 22 − Jeffrey Jones (December 4, 2023) 22-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 22-2 The comment provides the Commenter’s opinion. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
22-3 The comment expresses concern about privacy, light, and noise. Regarding privacy and light, please refer to General Response 2. Regarding noise, a Noise Study was prepared to analyze noise impacts from the proposed Project. This study is included in Appendix I and summarized on Page 70 of the Draft IS/MND. The noise study determined the increase in vehicle and mechanical noise from the Project would be less than 3 dBA, which is the limit of detection by the human ear (see Draft IS/MND
Project.
22-4 The comment expresses concern about neighborhood integrity and zoning. Draft IS/MND Section 5.11 (page 63) addresses potential land use impacts. The proposed Project will not physically divide an established community. Furthermore, the proposed Project does not conflict with land use plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoidin g an environmental effect, or that result in a significant impact.
22-5 The comment suggests that existing infrastructure (public services) is unable to handle the proposed Project. Draft IS/MND Section 5.15 (page 75) analyzes impacts to public services i ncluding fire, police, schools, parks, and other public services. The analysis determined that no significant impacts would occur. Orange Police and Fire Departments have reviewed the Project, provided comments, and determined that the Project would not adversely affect response times or services. 22-6 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 22-7 The comment suggests that the Project will lower the value of the Commenter’s home. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
22-8 The comment expresses concern about shadowing solar panels on existing properties. The topic of shade and shado w impacts is addressed in General Response 2.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 74 22-9 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 22-10 The comment expresses concern about parking. Please refer to General Response
1. 22-11 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 22-12 The comment expresses concern over community character and aesthetic impacts.
There are no scenic resources or scenic vistas on the Project site or within its vicinity. Please see Draft IS/MND Section 5.1 (page 21) for further information on aesthetic impacts. The comment may also be referring to the architecture of the proposed buildings. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. The City has a detailed Design Review proce ss, which addresses architectural styles. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
22-13 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 75 Individual Comment Letter 23 − Kendall Jones (December 4, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 76
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 77
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 78 Individual Response 23 − Kendall Jones (December 4, 2023) 23-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 23-2 The comment provides the Commenter’s opinion. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
23-3 The comment expresses concern about privacy, light, and noise. Regarding privacy and light, please refer to General Response 2. Regarding noise, a Noise Study was prepared to analyze noise impacts from the proposed Project. This study is included in Appendix I and summarized on Page 70 of the Draft IS/MND. The noise study determined the increase in vehicle and mechanical noise from the Project would be less than 3 dBA, which is the limit of detection by the human ear (see Draft IS/MND
Project.
23-4 The comment expresses concern about neighborhood integrity and zoning. Draft IS/MND Section 5.11 (page 63) addresses potential land use impacts. The proposed Project will not physically divide an established community. Furthermore, the proposed Project does not conflict with land use plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding an enviro nmental effect, or that result in a significant impact.
23-5 The comment suggests that existing infrastructure (public services) is unable to handle the proposed Project. Draft IS/MND Section 5.15 (page 75) analyzes impacts to public services including fi re, police, schools, parks, and other public services. The analysis determined that no significant impacts would occur. Orange Police and Fire Departments have reviewed the Project, provided comments, and determined that the Project would not adversely affect response times or services. 23-6 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 23-7 The comment suggests that the Project will lower the value of the Commenter’s home. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
23-8 The comment expresses concern about shadowing solar panels on existing properties. The topic of shade and shadow impacts is addr essed in General Response 2.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 79 23-9 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 23-10 The comment expresses concern about parking. Please refer to General Response
1. 23-11 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 23-12 The comment expresses concern over community character and aesthetic impacts.
There are no scenic resources or scenic vistas on the Project site or within its vicinity. Please see Draft IS/MND Section 5.1 (page 21) for further information on aesthetic impacts. The comment may also be referring to the architecture of the proposed buildings. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. The City has a detailed Design Review proce ss, which addresses architectural styles. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
23-13 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 80 Individual Comment Letter 24 − Laurence Hamlin (December 4, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 81
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 82 Individual Response 24 − Laurence Hamlin (December 4, 2023) 24-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 24-2 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
24-3 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
24-4 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 83 Individual Comment Letter 25 − Stephen and Kristina Reifenstein (December 4, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 84
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 85 Individual Response 25 − Stephen and Kristina Reifenstein (December 4, 2023) 25-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 25-2 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 25-3 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
25-4 The comment suggests that the Project will lower the value of the Commenter’s home. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
25-5 The comment references several topics, including traffic, parking, light, noise, and privacy. The topics of traffic and parking are addressed in General Response 1 .
The topics of light and privacy are addressed in General Response 2 . A Noise Study was prepared to analyze noise impacts from the proposed Project. This study is included in Appendix I and summarized on Page 70 of the Draft IS/MND. The noise study determined the increase in vehicle and mechanical noise from the Project would be less than 3 dBA, which is the limit of detection by the human ear (see Draft IS/MND Page 70). Therefore, no significant noise impacts would occu r from the proposed Project.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 86 Individual Comment Letter 26 − Todd and Brittany Calvert (December 4, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 87 Individual Response 26 − Todd and Brittany Calvert (December 4, 2023) 26-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 26-2 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 26-3 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 26-4 The comment sugg ests that the Project will lower the value of the Commenter’s home. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
26-5 The comment expresses concern about parking. Please refer to General Response
1. 26-6 The comment expresses concern about noise and light pollution. The topic of lighting is addressed in General Response 2 . A Noise Study was prepared to analyze noise impa cts from the proposed Project. This study is included in Appendix I and summarized on Page 70 of the Draft IS/MND. The noise study determined the increase in vehicle and mechanical noise from the Project would be less than 3 dBA, which is the limit of detection by the human ear (see Draft IS/MND
Project.
26-7 The comment references future development on Katella but does not provide specific comments. Future development would be governed by existing land use regulations or discretionary actions similar to the proposed Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
26-8 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 88 Individual Comment Letter 27 − Betty and Bill Bath (December 5, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 89 Individual Response 27 − Betty and Bill Bath (December 5, 2023) 27-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 27-2 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 27-3 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 27-4 The comment expresses concern about parking. Please refer to General Response
1. 27-5 The comment suggests that the Project will lower the value of the Commenter’s home. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 90 Individual Comment Letter 28 − Eduardo Esquivel (December 5, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 91
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 92 Individual Response 28 − Eduardo Esquivel (December 5, 2023) 28-1 The comment expresses concern about privacy and home values. Please refer to General Response 2 for additional in formation on privacy. Regarding home values, the topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
28-2 The comment expresses concern about parking. Please refer to General Response
1. 28-3 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 93 Individual Comment Letter 29 − Mai Vu (December 5, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 94 Individual Response 29 − Mai Vu (December 5, 2023)
29-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 29-2 The comment expresses concern about privacy, noise and light pollution. The topics of privacy and lighting are addressed in General Response 2. A Noise Study was prepared to analyze noise impacts from the proposed Project. This study is included in Appendix I and summarized on Page 70 of the Draft IS/MND. The noise study determined the increase in vehicle and mechanical noise from the Project would be less than 3 dBA, which is the limit of detection by the human ear (see Draft IS/MND
Project.
29-3 The comment references traffic, noise, blocked views, privacy, parking, and devaluation of property values. Please see Response to Comment 29 -2 regarding noise. Please refer to General Response 1 regarding traffic and parking concerns.
Please refer to General Response 2 regarding privacy concerns. Regarding views, there are no scenic resources or scenic vistas on the Project site or within its vicinity.
Please see Draft IS/MND Section 5.1 (page 21) for further information on aesthetic impacts. Furthermore, private views are not protected. Lastly, the comment suggests that the Project will lower the value of the Commenter’s home. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
29-4 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 29-5 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opinion about p reventing a small lot subdivision from being allowed next to R-1 zoning anywhere in the City. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 95 Individual Comment Letter 30 − Mika Jones (December 5, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 96
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 97
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 98 Individual Response 30 − Mika Jones (December 5, 2023) 30-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 30-2 The comment provides the Comm enter’s opinion. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
30-3 The comment expresses concern about privacy, light, and noise. Regarding privacy and light, please refer to General Response 2. Regarding noise, a Noise Study was prepared to analyze noise impacts from the proposed Project. This study is included in Appendix I and summarized on Page 70 of the Draft IS/MND. The noise study determined the increase in vehicle and mechanical noise from the Project would be less than 3 dBA, which is the limit of detection by the human ear (see Draft IS/MND
Project.
30-4 The comment expresses concern about neighborhood integrity and zoning. Draft IS/MND Section 5.11 (page 63) addresses potential land use impacts. The proposed Project will not physically divide an established community. Furthermore, the proposed Project does not conflict with land use p lans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding an environmental effect, or that result in a significant impact.
30-5 The comment suggests that existing infrastructure (public services) is unable to handle the proposed Project. Draft IS /MND Section 5.15 (page 75) analyzes impacts to public services including fire, police, schools, parks, and other public services. The analysis determined that no significant impacts would occur. Orange Police and Fire Departments have reviewed the Project , provided comments, and determined that the Project would not adversely affect response times or services. 30-6 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 30-7 The comment suggests that the Project will lower the value of the Commenter’s home. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
30-8 The comment expresses concern about shadowing sol ar panels on existing properties. The topic of shade and shadow impacts is addressed in General Response 2.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 99 30-9 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 30-10 The comment expresses concern about parking. Please refer to General Response
1. 30-11 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 30-12 The comment expresses concern over community character and aesthetic impacts.
There are no scenic resources or scenic vistas on the Project site or wi thin its vicinity. Please see Draft IS/MND Section 5.1 (page 21) for further information on aesthetic impacts. The comment may also be referring to the architecture of the proposed buildings. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. The City has a detailed Design Review process, which addresses architectural styles. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
30-13 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposit ion to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 100 Individual Comment Letter 31 − Katherine Gernak (December 5, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 101 Individual Response 31 − Katherine Gernak (December 5, 2023) 31-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 31-2 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 31-3 The comment expresses concern about parking. Please refer to General Response
1. 31-4 The comment expresses concern about privacy and home value. Please refer to General Response 2 for response to privacy concerns. The comment suggests that the Project will lower the value of the Commenter’s home. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 102 Individual Comment Letter 32 − Al Tucker (December 5, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 103
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 104
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 105
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 106
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 107
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 108
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 109
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 110
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 111
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 112
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 113 Individual Response 32 − Al Tucker (December 5, 2023)
32-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 32-2 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 32-3 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 32-4 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 32-5 The comment expresses concern about a decrease in property values. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
32-6 The comment expresses concern about parking. Please refer to General Response
1. 32-7 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 32-8 The comment suggests the Project would eliminate “safe time slots” for vehicles leaving Carleton Avenue. This comment pertains to traffic volumes generated by the Project, which is discussed in General Response 1.
32-9 The comment suggests that using signa ge to prevent southbound left turn movements into the Project from Cambridge would not be effective. The Commenter does not provide any evidence to justify this comment. Signage is regularly used on roadways to dictate traffic patterns and regulations. Enforcement is a component to the effectiveness of signage. In this case, the mitigation measure requires signage or striping to restrict the left turn movement, the design of which will be determined during final project design. The final design will then be reviewed and approved by the City’s traffic engineer with the objective of creating a safe and effective means of restricting the southbound left turn movement. 32-10 The comment suggests adding a traffic signal at Carleton Avenue and Cambridge Street. In order to install a new traffic signal, the intersection must meet “warrants,” which is the justification for a signal. Signal warrants are generally based on traffic volumes or accident data, or other unique circumstances. The proposed Project does not ge nerate enough traffic to trigger an analysis of signal warrants at that City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 114 intersection. Please refer to General Response 1 for further information on traffic issues.
32-11 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 32-12 The comment provides the Commenter’s opinions about other development projects involving the Project Applicant. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
32-13 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 32-14 The comment expresses concern about a decrease in property values. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
32-15 The comment expresses concern about parking. Please refer to General Response
1. 32-16 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 115 Individual Comment Letter 33 − Jeremy Campadonia (December 6, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 116
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 117
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 118
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 119
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 120
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 121 Individual Response 33 − Jeremy Campadonia (December 6, 2023) 33-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 33-2 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 33-3 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 33-4 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 33-5 The comment expresses concern about a change in zoning, which is the discretionary land use decision being considered by the City. From a CEQA perspective, the Draft IS/MND Section 5.11 (page 63) addresses potential land use impacts. The proposed Project will not physically divide an established community.
Furthermore, the proposed Project does not conflict with land use plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding an environmental effect, or that result in a significant impact.
33-6 The comment pertains to the style (architecture) of the proposed buildings. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. The City has a detailed Design Review process, which addresses architectural styles. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
33-7 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 33-8 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 33-9 The comment expresses concern about parking. Please refer to General Response
1. 33-10 The comment expresses concern about a decrease in property values. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
33-11 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 122 33-12 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
33-13 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of th e Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 123 Individual Comment Letter 34 − Melissa Campitelli (December 6, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 124
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 125 Individual Response 34 − Melissa Campitelli (December 6, 2023) 34-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 34-2 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 34-3 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 34-4 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opinion about preventing a small lot subdivision from being allowed next to R-1 zoning anywhere in the City. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 126 Individual Comment Letter 35 − Janet Majick (December 6, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 127
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 128
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 129
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 130
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 131 Individual Response 35 − Janet Majick (December 6, 2023) 35-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 35-2 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
35-3 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. S ince th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
35-4 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 35-5 The comment states that the Project would obstruct the skyline view. The proposed Project would be subject to the small lot subdivision ordinance height limit of 35 feet. The existing E. Carleton neighborhood has a height limit of 32 feet, as does the existing C-P zoning on the Project site. Therefore, the proposed Project would not substantially change the permitted height. Please refer to General Response 2 for more information. Additionally, there are no scenic resources or scenic vistas on the Project site or within its vicinity. Please see Draft IS/MND Section 5.1 (page 21) for further information on aesthetic impacts.
35-6 The comment expresses concern about a change in zoning, which is the discretionary land use decision being considered by the City. From a CEQA perspective, the Draft IS/MND Section 5.11 (page 63) addresses potential land use impacts. The proposed Project will not physically divide an established community.
Furthermore, the proposed Project does not conflict with land use plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding an environmental effect, or that result in a significant impact.
35-7 The comment expresses concern about consistency with several General Plan land use policies. Part of the discretionary land use decision being considered by the City is a determination of General Plan consistency. From a CEQA perspective, the Draft IS/MND Section 5.11 (page 63) addresses potential land use impacts. The proposed Project will not physically divide an established community.
Furthermore, the proposed Proj ect does not conflict with land use plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding an environmental effect, or that result in a significant impact.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 132 35-8 The comment pertains to the style (architecture) of the proposed buildings. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. The City has a detailed Design Review process, which addresses architectural styles. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
35-9 The comment suggests that the Project does not adhere the provisions of the Small Lot Subdivision ordinance. Part of the discretionary decisions being considered by the City is a determination of consistency with the Small Lot Ordinance. The comment references a portion of the Small Lot Ordinance pertaining to architectural style. The City has a detailed Design Review process, which addresses architectural styles. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided . The other portion of the Small Lot Ordinance referenced pertains to privacy. Please refer to General Response 2.
35-10 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. 35-11 The comment expresses objection to the zone change and concern about property values decreasing. The proposed zone change is the discretionary land use decision being considered by the City. From a CEQA perspective, the Draft IS/MND Section
5.11 (page 63) addresses potential land use impacts. The proposed Project will not physically divide an established community. Furthermore, the proposed Project does not conflict with land use plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding an environmental effect, or that result in a significant impact.
The topic of land values is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
35-12 The comment expresses concern about a decrease in property values. This topic is beyond the scope of the Draft IS/MND. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
35-13 The comment expresses concern about noise. A Noise Study was prepared to analyze noise impacts from the proposed Project. This study is included in Appendix I and summarized on Page 70 of the Draft IS/MND. The noise study determined the increase in vehicle and mechanical noise from the Project would be less than 3 dBA, which is the limit of detection by the human ear (see Draft IS/MND
Project.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 133 35-14 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 35-15 The comment expresses the Commenter’s opposition to the Project. Since th is comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 134 Individual Comment Letter 36 − Pamela Dittrich (December 6, 2023)
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 135 Individual Response 36 − Pamela Dittrich (December 6, 2023) 36-1 The comment is introductory. Since this comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND, no further response is required or provided. 36-2 The comment pertains to traffic. Please refer to General Response 1. 36-3 The comment expresses concern about privacy. Please refer to General Response
2. The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 136 SECTION 3.0 REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT IS/MND
3.1 Updates and Corrections to the Draft IS/MND
Following public review of the Draft IS/MND, it is possible that revisions to the Draft IS/MND are warranted based on (1) additional or revised information r equired to prepare a response to a specific comment; (2) applicable updated information that was not available at the time of D raft IS/MND publication; and/or (3) typographical errors . Any changes to the Draft IS/MND are shown as strikeout text to indicate deletions and underlined text to signify additions.
The following revisions are clarifications to the analysis presented in the Draft IS/MND and do not constitute substantial revisions. CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5 states that a lead agenc y is required to recirculate a Draft IS/MND “when the document must be substantially revised after public notice of its availability (CEQA Guidelines 15073.5(a)).” Substantial revisions would occur if “a new, avoidable significant effect is identified and mitigation measures or project revisions must be added in order to reduce the effect to insignificance (CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5(b)(1)).” Since the errata “merely clarifies, amplifies, or makes insignificant modifications to the negative declaration,” recirculation is not required (CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5(c)(4)).
Section 5.17, Page 83, 1st Full Paragraph
Transportation impacts, both VMT and LOS, have been analyzed in the reports 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Project (TTM 19253) Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis, City of Orange, CA , prepared by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan RK Engineering Group , Inc ., dated October 14, 2022 and included in Appendix J, 901 E. Katella Avenue In -Fill Residential Project (TTM 19253) Trip Generation Analysis, City of Orange, CA , prepared by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan RK Engineering Group, Inc., dated October 14 11, 2022 and included in Appendix K, and Site Distance Analysis for the 901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, Orange, CA, prepared by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, dated July 22, 2022 May 30, 2023 and included in Appendix L.
Section 5.17, Page 83, 3rd Full Paragraph
Furthermore, the Project is also screened from further VMT analysis because the Project occurs in a low VMT generating area.
Section 5.17(b), Page 84, 1st Full Paragraph
As document in the report 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Project (TTM 19253) Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis, City of Orange, CA, prepared by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan RK Engineering Group, Inc., dated October 14, 2022, and included in Appendix J, the VMT per Service Population within the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) for the Project site would be 15.4 VMT. For the same TAZ, the VMT per Service Population for the City of Orange General Plan Build O ut is 31.3 VMT. Since the VMT per Service Population for the proposed Project is less than the VMT per Service Population for the City of Orange General Plan Build Out, the proposed Project is screened from further VMT analysis and the Project’s impact on VMT would be less than significant.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project FINAL IS/MND Page 137 Section 5.17(c), Page 84, Last Full Paragraph
Although existing, the Project driveway on Cambridge Street is close to the Cambridge/Katella intersection. A potential hazard could occur with cars exiting the Project site and making a left turn on to Cambridge Street. Given the potential impact, a sight distance analysis was prepared for that intersection (Site Distance Analysis for the 901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, Orange, CA , prepared by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, dated July 22, 2022 May 30, 2023 and included in Appendix L). The sight distance analysis used the criteria and procedures included in the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) State Highway Design Manual (HDM) for “Private Road Intersections.” Stopping sight distance is defined in the Caltrans HDM to be the distance required by the driver of a vehicle, traveling at a given speed, to bring the vehicle to a stop after an object ½ foot high on the road becomes visible. Stopping sight distance is measured from the driver’s eyes, which is assumed to be 3 ½ feet above the pavement surface, to an object ½ foot high on the road. The speed used in determining stopping sight distance is defined as the “critical speed” or 85th percentil e speed which is the speed at which 85% of the vehicles are traveling at or less. The critical speed is the single most important factor in determining stopping sight distance.
Section 5.17, Page 86, Sources
Sources: 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Project (TTM 19253) Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis, City of Orange, CA, prepared by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan RK Engineering Group, Inc., dated October 14, 2022 and included in Appendix J ; 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Project (TTM 19253) Trip Generation Analysis, City of Orange, CA, prepared by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan RK Engineering Group, Inc., dated October 14 11, 2022 and included in Appendix K; Site Distance Analysis for the 901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, Orange, CA, prepared by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, dated May 30, 2023 and included in Appendix L; City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment (TIAG) dated July 2020; and City of Orange General Plan Public Safety Element, Figure PS-4.
Attachment A
• Supplemental VMT Analysis
March 4, 2024
Mr. Peter Carlson
CARLSON STRATEGIC LAND SOLUTIONS
27134A Paseo Espada, Suite 323
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
Subject: 901 E. Katella Avenue Reside ntial Project (TTM 19253) Supplemental Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis, City of Orange
Dear Mr. Carlson
A. Introduction
RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) is please d to provide this supplemental Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis for the proposed 901 E. Katella Avenue In-F ill Residential Project (TTM 19253).
RK previously completed the 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Project (TTM 19253) Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis, City of Orange, CA, October 14, 2022 (2022 VMT Analysis). The 2022 VMT Analysis utilized the North Orange County Collaborative VMT Traffic Study Screening Tool (NOCC+) to esti mate project VMT, and the resu lts showed that the project would have a less than significant impact. A copy of the NOCC+ printout from the 2022 VMT Analysis is provided in Appendix A for reference.
In response to comments on the Draft IS/MND, the City of Orange has requested a supplemental VMT modeling analysis to confirm the findings of the 2022 VMT Analysis.
This supplemental VMT analysis utilizes th e latest version of the Orange County Transportation Analysis Model (OCTAM) and provides full “with project” model runs to evaluate the project’s impact on VMT.
Project impacts are evaluated based on the thresholds of significance established in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment, July 2020 (VMT Guidelines).
CARLSON STRATEGIC LAND SOLUTIONS
RK19634.3.doc
JN: 2827-2022-07
B. Project Description
The project site is located at 901 E. Katella Avenue in the City of Orange. The proposed project consists of razing an approximately 20, 621 square feet (SF) existing vacant AT&T call center and constructing fifty-two (52) paired and detached townhomes.1 Exhibit A shows the location map of the proposed project. Exhibit B s hows the project site plan.
C. VMT Impact Thresholds
The City of Orange VMT Guidelines state that a project would result in a significant project- generated VMT impact if either of the following conditions are satisfied.
1. The baseline project-generated VMT per se rvice population exceeds the City of Orange General Plan Buildout VMT per service population, or
2. The cumulative project-generated VMT per service population exceeds the City of Orange General Plan Buildout VMT per service population.
To establish the City of Orange General Plan Buildout VMT per service population, a linear interpolation of the citywide VMT per serv ice population under the Base Model Years 2016 and 2045 Scenarios was performe d. Table 1 shows the OCTAM modeling results used to calculate the City of Orange General Plan Bu ildout VMT Per Service Population threshold of significance.
Table 1
City of Orange VMT Threshold Criteria
Agency Base Model Year Total VMT Total Service
Population
Total VMT per
Service Population
City of Orange
2016 8,833,649 314,028 28.1
2045 9,651,889 339,760 28.4
20301 9,228,662 326,450 28.3
City of Orange General Plan Buildout (Year 2030) VMT per Service Population (Threshold of Significance) 28.3
1 Linear interpolation was used to determine the City of Orange General Plan Build-Out Year 2030 VMT/service population.
1 The purpose of this study is to confirm the findin gs of the 2022 VMT Analys is. Therefore, this study evaluates project impacts based on th e project description used in the 2022 VMT analysis which included 52 dwelling units. Since the time of the 2022 study, the unit count has decreased to 49 dwelling units. The reduction in dwelling units is not expected to significantly affect the findings of this analysis.
CARLSON STRATEGIC LAND SOLUTIONS
RK19634.3.doc
JN: 2827-2022-07
As shown in Table 1, the City of Orange VMT th reshold of significance is calculated to be
28.3 total VMT per service population. As such, a project would result in a significant VMT impact if its project-generated VMT exceeds 28.3 total VMT/service population.
Additionally, the project’s effect on VMT would be considered significant if it results in either of the following conditions to be satisfied:
1. The baseline link-level boundary Citywi de VMT per service population increases under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition, or
2. The cumulative link-level boundary Citywi de VMT per service population increases under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition.
D. OCTAM SED Modifications
Consistent with the City of Orange VMT Gu idelines, the OCTAM has been utilized to conduct full model runs with modified soci o-economic data to reflect “No-Project” and “With Project” conditions.
OCTAM provides a Model Year 2016 and Model Year 2045 scenario. The proposed project is located within Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 45 3. Exhibit C illustrates the project TAZ within OCTAM.
To determine the socio-economic data for the “No-Project” Scenarios, an employment conversion factor of 3.5 employees per t housand square feet, which is the typical employment conversion factor for office land uses per the Orange County Subarea Modeling Guidelines Manual , dated October 2020, was applied to the vacant AT&T call center description (i.e., approximately 20,621 square feet (SF)) and removed from the Base Model SED.
To determine the socio-economic data for the “With Project” Scenarios, a population factor of 3.08 residents per househol ds, which is the citywide av erage number of residents per households, was applied to the Project descri ption; similarly, an employed population factor of 1.62 employed residents per household, which is th e citywide average number of employed residents per househ old, was applied to the Projec t description. No additional modifications were made to the employment-related SED beyond the No-Project Conditions.
The OCTAM SED for the City of Orange, and the population and empl oyment factors are provided in Appendix B.
CARLSON STRATEGIC LAND SOLUTIONS
RK19634.3.doc
JN: 2827-2022-07
Table 2 shows all the SED modifications applied to TAZ 453.
Table 2
OCTAM SED Modifications for TAZ 453
Socio-Economic Data
Category
Project
Only1,2
Year 2016 Year 2045
Base
Model
No-
Project3
With
Project
Base
Model
No-
Project3
With
Project
Total Population 160 613 613 773 622 622 782
Household Population 160 613 613 773 622 622 782
Employment Population 84 248 248 332 254 254 338
Total Households 52 283 283 335 284 284 336
Retail Employment 0 241 241 241 250 250 250
Service Employment -72 447 375 375 465 393 393
Basic Employment 0 416 416 416 417 417 417
1 The population growth for the total population and household population was estimated by multiplying the citywide average number of residents per households from the 2016 OCTAM socio-economic data (SED) (i.e. 3.08 residents per households) to the project description. Similarly, the population growth for the employment population was estimated by multiplying the citywide average number of employment population per households from the 2016 OCTAM SED (i.e.
1.62 employed residents per household) to the project description. The 2016 SED was utilized to calculate the average rates because it resulted in a more intensive rate than the 2045 SED. 2 The employment growth for the service employment was estimated by multiplying the 20.621 thousand square feet of the existing call center and a conversion rate of 3.5 employees per thousand square feet (TSF) for office land uses per the Typical Employment Conversion Factors Table from the Orange County Subarea Modeling Guidelines Manual, dated October 2020,
3 Service employment is reduced in the "No-Project" Conditions to account for the vacant AT&T call center.
As shown in Table 2, service employment is first reduced by 72 employees in the “No- Project” Conditions to account for the vacant AT&T center. As also shown in Table 2, the Project would result in an increase in 160 residents and no addi tional workers for an increased total Project service population of 160 people.
E. OCTAM VMT Assessment
(OCTAM) has been utilized to conduct full model runs for the following scenarios:
• Year 2016 No-Project;
• Year 2016 With Project;
• Year 2045 No-Project; and
• Year 2045 With Project.
CARLSON STRATEGIC LAND SOLUTIONS
RK19634.3.doc
JN: 2827-2022-07
To determine project-generate d VMT per service population, the difference in total VMT between the With Project and No Project scenar ios was calculated in each model year and was divided the total service population generated by the project (i.e., 160 people).
Table 3 summarizes the OCTAM VMT per service population calculations for TAZ 453 under the Year 2016 and Year 2045 scenarios.
Table 3
OCTAM VMT Assessment
Total VMT per Service Population Calculations Summary
Project
TAZ Metric
Year 2016 Year 2045
Base
Model
No-
Project
With
Project
Project
Generated
VMT
Base
Model
No-
Project
With
Project
Project
Generated
VMT
453
Total VMT 67,869 64,593 67,055 2,462 6 9,927 65,683 68,112 2,429 Total Service
Population 1,717 1,645 1,805 160 1,754 1,682 1,842 160
Total VMT Per
Service Population 39.5 39.3 37.2 15.4 39.9 39.1 37.0 15.2
F. Project-Generated VMT Criteria Assessment
A project would result in a significant proj ect-generated VMT impact if the baseline or cumulative project-generated VMT per servic e population exceeds the City of Orange General Plan Buildout VMT per service po pulation (i.e. 28.3 total VMT per service population).
Table 4 summarizes the findings of the Project-Generated VMT Impact Analysis.
Table 4
OCTAM VMT Assessment
Project-Generated VMT Impact Criteria
Project
TAZ Year
Project-Generated VMT
Total VMT Total
Service Population
Total VMT per
Service Population
453
2016 2,462 160 15.4
2045 2,429 160 15.2
City of Orange VMT Threshold 28.3
Significant Impacts? No
CARLSON STRATEGIC LAND SOLUTIONS
RK19634.3.doc
JN: 2827-2022-07
As shown in Table 4 above, the total VMT per service population under the Year 2016 With Project, and Year 2045 With Project scenario s does not exceed the 28.3 total VMT per service population threshold.
As such, the proposed project would have a less than significant project- generated VMT impact under CEQA.
G. Supplementary Comparison of NOCC+ and OCTAM Project VMT To provide a comprehensive assessment, RK has calculated the Project VMT per service population for TAZ 453 using the same me thodology as the NOCC+ but with the parameters from the latest OCTAM model r uns. The NOCC+ calculates Project VMT per Service Population by multiplying daily trips by average trip length and dividing by the service population.
The OCTAM daily trips were dete rmined by calculating the diff erence in daily flows in TAZ 453 from each model year’s Wi th Project and No-Project Scenarios and selecting the maximum net daily trips of the two (2) model years. The average trip length was obtained from the OCTAM Dashboard VMT Tool. The se rvice population of 160 was calculated based on the citywide average number of residents per h ousehold from the latest version of OCTAM.
Table 5 summarizes the NOCC+ and OCTAM par ameters and compares the Project VMT Per service population utilizing the NOCC+ methodology for each set of parameters.
Table 5
Comparison of NOCC+ & OCTAM Project VMT per Service Population TAZ 453
Metric NOCC+ OCTAM1
Daily Trips 335 342
Average Trip Length 7.2 7.2
Service Population 156 160
Project VMT Per Service Population 15.4 15.4
1 For comparison purposes only, the OCTAM Project VMT Per Service Population identified in this table is calculated using the same methodology of the NOCC+ with OCTAM parameters.
As shown in Table 5, the Project VMT pe r Service Population utilizing the NOCC+ methodology with OCTAM parameters was calculated to be 15.4 VMT per service population, which does not exceed the 28.3 total VMT per service population threshold.
CARLSON STRATEGIC LAND SOLUTIONS
RK19634.3.doc
JN: 2827-2022-07
H. Project-Effect on VMT Criteria Assessment
The project’s effect on VMT at the citywide level is also analyzed to determine if the baseline or cumulative project-generated VMT per service population increases under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition.
OCTAM Networks plots illustrating the roadway network links within City of Orange for the Year 2016 and Year 2045 analysis scenarios are provided in Appendix C.
Table 6 summarizes the findings of the project’s effect on VMT for the Year 2016 and Year 2045 Scenarios for the City of Orange.
Table 6
OCTAM VMT Assessment
Project Effect on VMT Criteria
Agency Metric
Year 2016 Year 2045
No-Project With Project No-Project With Project
City of Orange
Total Boundary Link-
Level Citywide VMT 3,345,200 3,346,072 3,740,443 3,740,944 Total Service
Population 313,956 314,116 339,688 339,848
Total VMT Per
Service Population 10.655 10.652 11.011 11.008
Percent (%) Change in Link-Level Boundary
Citywide Total VMT per Service Population -0.025% -0.034% Significant Effect? No No
As shown in Table 6, the inclusion of the Proj ect is not forecasted to increase baseline nor cumulative link-level boundar y citywide VMT per service population under the “With Project” Conditions compared to the “No-Project” Conditions.
The project is not expected to increase citywide VMT per service population and therefore the proposed project would have a less than significant effect on VMT under CEQA.
CARLSON STRATEGIC LAND SOLUTIONS
RK19634.3.doc
JN: 2827-2022-07
I. Conclusion
RK Engineering Group, Inc. has completed this supplemental Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis for the proposed 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Project (TTM 19253).
The project-generated VMT per service popu lation under the baseli ne and cumulative scenarios do not exceed the City of Orange General Plan Build Out Baseline VMT per service population threshold.
Additionally, the project effect on the baseline and cumulative link-level boundary Citywide VMT per service population are not expected to increase under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition.
As such, the project’s impact on VMT an d the project’s effect on VMT are less than significant and no mitigation measures are required.
The results of this supplem ental analysis confirm the findings from the 2022 VMT Analysis, and therefore there are no changes to the conclusions presented in the IS/MND.
RK Engineering Group, Inc. appreciates this opportunity to work with the CARLSON STRATEGIC LAND SOLUTIONS on this project. If you have any questions regarding this study, please do not hesitate to contact us at (949) 474-0809.
Sincerely,
RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
Justin Tucker, P.E., T.E. Nhi Ly, E.I.T.
A s s o c i a t e P r i n c i p a l E n g i n e e r I I
Attachments:
Exhibits
engineering
group, inc.
engineering
N
OCTAM TAZ 453
Exhibit C
901 KATELLA AVENUE IN-FILL RESIDENTIAL PROJECT VMT ANALYSIS, City of Orange, CA 2827-2022-07
Legend:
= TAZ 453
= Project Site
Appendices
Appendix A
NOCC+ Screening Tool Worksheet
Project Information Project Trips and VMT Information
Project Name Opening Year
2024 VMT Methodology Origin Destination (OD)
Parcel Number ( OCTAM TAZ#453 )
Daily Trips: 335 Average Trip Length: 7.2 Service Population: 156 Screening Criteria for Orange
Is the project location in a Transit Priority Area? No Project VMT Thresholds Comparison Is the project location in a low VMT generating zone? No OPR Guidance (15% Below Existing) Is the Project one of these land use types? No GHG Reduction Targets (14.3% Below Existing) (show land use types) Below Existing
Does the project generate fewer than 110 daily trips? No Better than General Plan Buildout (enter project land use in the section below)
The Project does not meet screening criteria. Please Continue Project Land Use Information Unit
Residential : Single Family Homes 52 Dwelling Units
Residential : MultiFamily Homes 0 Dwelling Units Existing VMT per service populationProject VMT per service populationChart Min31.6 15.4 10.0 Office 0.000 1,000 Sqaure Feet VMT per service populationCheckboxes Retail 0.000 1,000 Sqaure Feet FALSE OPR Guidance 26.9 26.9 26.9 26.9FALSE GHG Reduction Targets (14.3% Below Existing)27.1 27.1 27.1 27.1 Industrial 0.000 1,000 Sqaure Feet FALSE Below Existing 31.6 31.6 31.6 31.6TRUE Maximum Achievable Reduction 31.3 31.3 31.3 31.3 Private School 0 Students
University 0 Students
Entertainment 0.000 1,000 Sqaure Feet
Hotel 0 Rooms
375-461-41
901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Project
31.6 15.4
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33
Existing VMT per service population Project VMT per service population North Orange County Collaborative VMT Traffic Study Screening Tool VMT per service population 15.4
31.3 10
15 20
25 30
VMT Comparison
GPB
NOCC+
Appendix B
OCTAM Socio-Economic Data for City of Orange TAZs,
Population Factors Calculations, and Typical Employment Factors TOT_POP HH_POP EMP_POP TOT_HH RET_EMP SVC_EMP BAS_EMP TOT_POP HH_POP EMP_POP TOT_HH RET_EMP SVC_EMP BAS_EMP 412 2,765 2,759 1,413 833 18 105 85 2,804 2, 798 1,450 840 18 111 87 413 2,212 2,193 1,245 762 19 147 204 2,243 2,224 1,278 764 20 150 205 414 2,210 2,210 1,212 776 0 86 708 2,376 2,376 1,319 817 5 96 724 415 1,275 1,275 647 447 3 429 212 1,317 1,317 674 458 3 448 221 416 2,058 2,058 1,101 702 5 109 84 2,091 2,091 1,132 707 5 109 89 417 1,063 1,063 556 328 4 25 114 1,076 1,076 570 329 4 25 119 418 2,064 2,042 850 689 30 342 420 2,192 2,170 915 730 36 365 427 419 2,007 2,007 1,006 665 110 609 329 2,042 2,042 1,038 672 115 630 332 420 2,720 2,678 1,510 901 35 274 193 2,756 2,714 1,551 906 36 284 195 421 591 591 401 205 97 538 2,530 599 599 412 205 100 581 2,617 422 1,466 1,466 768 543 4 170 118 1,486 1,486 789 547 4 180 118 423 1,961 1,961 983 580 4 173 1,322 1,987 1,987 1,006 578 4 173 1,328 424 878 878 509 296 0 77 52 889 889 521 297 0 82 59
425 1,088 1,088 542 292 329 385 129 1,103 1,103 555 295 330 388 130 427 1,560 1,548 626 495 0 205 115 1,582 1,570 642 497 0 210 115 428 121 121 48 26 874 576 164 122 122 41 26 956 610 164 429 160 157 110 46 319 2,467 7,390 163 160 113 46 322 2,559 7,406 432 1,715 1,669 844 538 0 170 128 1,800 1,754 897 566 1 170 133 433 1,658 1,632 842 558 242 516 190 1,681 1,655 865 562 249 536 196 434 738 738 362 201 0 28 37 749 749 371 202 0 31 38
435 2,041 2,041 1,000 316 263 150 243 2,070 2,070 1,027 320 271 156 247 436 1,036 1,036 507 331 3 37 50 1,051 1,051 521 332 3 37 54 437 1,710 1,708 802 571 0 70 241 1,780 1,778 844 589 0 70 248 438 516 516 261 182 8 18 321 953 953 487 306 9 18 322
441 16 16 10 10 128 1,396 2,741 241 241 149 103 173 1,593 2,848 442 3 3 1 2 255 1,775 1,846 3 3 1 2 322 2,005 1,990
443 570 555 319 188 29 53 106 579 564 328 190 38 73 113 444 612 601 247 199 0 35 52 620 609 253 199 18 70 58
445 204 204 102 60 0 6 15 203 203 103 59 0 18 15
447 3,614 3,573 1,698 1,109 0 305 295 3,664 3,623 1,744 1,109 6 346 311 448 3,123 3,123 1,280 747 197 316 255 3,167 3,167 1,315 756 201 322 255 449 1,518 1,513 636 503 3 144 110 1,547 1,542 657 510 3 155 117 451 1,527 1,527 856 402 52 237 87 1,548 1,548 879 405 62 243 87 452 857 845 388 251 6 73 45 868 856 398 251 10 73 48
453 613 613 248 283 241 447 416 622 622 254 284 250 465 417 454 1,093 1,080 559 366 0 88 145 1,108 1,095 575 368 0 101 156 456 98 98 66 57 387 2,573 5,561 99 99 68 57 411 2,775 5,736 457 1,998 1,998 640 458 208 459 1,313 2,784 2,784 901 589 209 462 1,307 458 1,699 1,690 922 531 36 357 134 1,722 1,713 945 533 57 379 140 459 1,725 1,725 965 508 211 943 433 1,749 1,749 991 510 240 1,021 442 460 1,602 1,458 666 419 12 67 295 1,746 1,597 736 456 21 111 309 461 2 0 1 0 23 1,231 2,432 2 0 1 0 23 1,287 2,496
462 1,017 1,017 383 356 0 355 59 1,031 1,031 394 354 0 362 61 463 1,899 1,877 813 459 117 742 1,993 2,042 2,020 885 485 128 800 2,070 464 3,314 1,510 932 531 0 120 185 3,384 1,531 964 535 0 120 187 465 1,677 1,651 822 592 53 519 256 1,703 1,677 847 595 67 537 262 466 1,636 1,636 637 404 74 260 78 1,659 1,659 653 407 53 255 121 467 5,299 5,299 2,475 1,602 0 101 238 5,372 5,372 2,543 1,611 0 135 250 468 1,255 1,255 784 499 0 56 100 1,273 1,273 807 502 0 61 103 469 466 459 283 120 25 215 1,653 472 465 290 121 25 267 1,727 470 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 26 33 0
471 7,502 7,447 3,488 1,681 69 556 509 7,666 7,611 3,606 1,700 82 576 536 472 2,485 2,482 1,601 1,000 0 91 136 2,519 2,516 1,643 1,009 0 100 140 473 2,283 2,283 1,273 847 926 3,941 3,302 4,608 4,608 2,688 2,161 1,018 4,164 3,329 474 4,225 4,225 2,560 1,829 111 1,358 7,054 8,794 8,794 5,499 3,762 1,082 1,985 7,078 475 3,177 3,173 1,523 809 151 1,148 594 3,221 3,217 1,563 814 170 1,290 627 476 1,394 1,387 555 402 17 98 28 1,413 1,406 570 402 22 118 29 477 2,606 2,539 1,400 933 41 595 185 2,680 2,613 1,458 957 78 686 211 478 2,474 2,474 1,097 933 8 401 246 2,536 2,536 1,139 948 11 407 247 479 1,591 1,578 890 668 24 2,426 413 1,612 1,599 913 674 50 2,854 456 480 1,300 1,295 742 481 81 444 219 1,318 1,313 762 482 93 498 227 481 1,380 1,376 790 448 31 193 114 1,399 1,395 809 453 34 197 116 482 2,541 2,501 1,243 681 122 1,251 937 2,658 2,618 1,322 714 135 1,397 949 483 2,196 2,196 1,507 918 368 317 297 2,227 2,227 1,547 925 391 345 312 484 3,325 0 2,005 0 0 8,501 689 3,348 0 2,042 0 5 8,592 997 485 4,764 4,596 2,299 1,499 288 2,051 2,276 4,836 4,663 2,367 1,515 310 2,390 2,350 486 5,638 5,598 3,219 2,245 181 1,337 2,094 5,716 5,676 3,306 2,266 196 1,441 2,211 487 2,990 2,822 1,859 1,100 102 7,003 616 3,035 2,862 1,911 1,111 140 8,140 668 488 3,758 3,703 1,918 1,199 230 561 491 3,809 3,754 1,968 1,210 258 661 531 489 2,190 2,173 1,206 634 185 523 357 2,220 2,203 1,238 634 205 609 381 490 2,238 2,203 1,039 584 74 519 306 2,269 2,234 1,066 586 96 575 329 491 1,617 1,617 898 494 0 90 136 1,639 1,639 922 494 0 119 150 493 1,017 998 500 333 0 145 165 1,050 1,031 523 341 0 160 174 494 1,534 1,534 889 575 4 207 77 1,556 1,556 911 581 4 239 86 495 310 309 149 177 0 18 15 315 314 153 180 0 23 18
497 2,038 2,016 973 649 3 157 132 2,066 2,044 999 651 3 170 146 499 2,144 2,144 821 772 8 257 326 2,174 2,174 856 787 11 331 344 701 833 833 512 464 73 2,674 2,760 2,724 2,724 1,692 1,806 112 2,980 3,087 825 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 352 352 150 105 0 0 0
OCTAM Socio-Economic Data
City of Orange
City of Orange
TAZs
Model Year 2016 Model Year 2045
RK17692.1
JN: 2827-2022-07
TOT_POP HH_POP EMP_POP TOT_HH RET_EMP SVC_EMP BAS_EMP TOT_POP HH_POP EMP_POP TOT_HH RET_EMP SVC_EMP BAS_EMP OCTAM Socio-Economic Data
City of Orange
City of Orange
TAZs
Model Year 2016 Model Year 2045
826 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,260 2,260 960 737 0 0 1
828 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,148 1,148 256 341 0 0 38
Total 142,600 136,263 71,834 44,294 7,521 57,462 60,696 159,288 152,864 81,538 50,928 9,340 63,135 62,968 Citywide Average
HH_POP/HH
Citywide Average
EMP_POP/HH
3.08 1.62
3.00 1.60
RK17692.1
JN: 2827-2022-07
Orange County Subarea Modeling Guidelines Manual October 2020 Orange County Transportation Authority
TYPICAL EMPLOYMENT CONVERSION FACTORS
(June 2001)
Employment Type (Percentage Ranges)
Land Use Category Conversion Rates Range Retail Service Other Commercial 2.25 –2.75 employees/TSF1 60% - 90% 10% - 40% 0% – 5% Office/Office Park 3.00 – 4.00 employees/TSF 0% – 5% 20% – 30% 65% - 80% R&D/Light Industrial/Business Park 2.50 – 3.50 employees/TSF 0% – 5% 0% - 30% 60% - 100% Heavy Industrial 2.00 – 2.50 employees/TSF 0% 0% 100%
Warehouse 1.00 – 2.00 employees/TSF 0% 0% 100%
Restaurant 3.00 – 5.00 employees/TSF 100% 0% 0%
Medical Office/Post-Office/Bank 3.50 – 4.50 employees/TSF 0% - 10% 70% - 100% 0% – 20% Government Office/Civic Center 3.00 – 4.00 employees/TSF 0% – 5% 50% - 70% 25% – 50% Hospital 2.50 – 3.00 employees/TSF 0% 70% - 80% 20% – 30% Library/Museum 1.50 – 2.50 employees/TSF 0% 100% 0%
Hotel/Motel 0.75 – 1.25 employees/room 0% - 10% 70% - 80% 10% – 30% Schools 0.08 – 0.12 employees/student 0% 0% 100%
Golf Course 0.50 – 0.70 employees/acre 0% - 10% 90% - 100% 0% Developed Park/Athletic Fields 0.20 – 0.40 employees/acre 0% 80% - 100% 0% – 20% Park 0.05 – 0.10 employees/acre 0% 80% - 100% 0% – 20%
Agricultural 0.01 – 0.05 employees/acre 0% 0% 100%
1 Thousands of Square Feet
Appendix C
OCTAM City of Orange Network Plots
City of Orange
2016
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project (TTM 19253) Supplemental Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis, City of Orange RK19634.3 / JN: 2877-2022-07
RK Engineering Group, Inc.
City of Orange
2045
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project (TTM 19253) Supplemental Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis, City of Orange RK19634.3 / JN: 2877-2022-07
RK Engineering Group, Inc.
Attachment B
• Shade/Shadow Analysis (Sheets L7-L8)
901 E. Katella Ave
ORANGE, CA
1750 DEERE AVE, SANTA ANA, CA 92705
O 949.250.4822 www.landconcern.com
Conceptual Open and Private Space Plan
L-7
0 8 16 32
SCALE: 1” = 16’
January 16, 2024
Sun/Shade Existing
DECEMBER 21, 7:00 AM
DECEMBER 21, 8:30 AM
DECEMBER 21, 7:30 AM
WINTER SOLSTICE
WINTER SOLSTICE
WINTER SOLSTICE
DECEMBER 21, 9:30 AM
WINTER SOLSTICE
SHADOW LINE AT 9:30
SHADOW LINE AT 9:30
901 E. Katella Ave
ORANGE, CA
1750 DEERE AVE, SANTA ANA, CA 92705
O 949.250.4822 www.landconcern.com
Conceptual Open and Private Space Plan
L-8
0 8 16 32
SCALE: 1” = 16’
January 16, 2024
Sun/Shade Proposed
DECEMBER 21, 7:00 AM
DECEMBER 21, 8:30 AM
DECEMBER 21, 7:30 AM
DECEMBER 21, 9:30 AM
WINTER SOLSTICE
WINTER SOLSTICE
WINTER SOLSTICE
WINTER SOLSTICE
Attachment C
• Shade/Shadow Analysis (Sheet L35)
80'-2"
8'-6"
15'-5"
50'-2"
43'-3"
36'-5"
33'-1"
43'-9"
22'-8"
LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK
901 E. Katella Ave
ORANGE, CA
1750 DEERE AVE, SANTA ANA, CA 92705
O 949.250.4822 www.landconcern.com
Conceptual Open and Private Space Plan
L-35
0 8 16 32
SCALE: 1” = 16’
February 01, 2024
Existing Shade vs Proposed Shade: 12/21 @ 9:30 AM
^
Existing
Proposed
E. CARLETON AVE
PROJECT AREA
N. CAMBRIDGE ST.
918
932 432
1002
NOTE SHADE OF EX.
ELM ON HOUSE
NOTE SHADE FROM
PROP . 2 STORY HOME
NOTE SHADE OF EX.
ELM ON HOUSE
NOTE SHADE OF EX.
TREES
NOTE SHADE FROM PROP .
2 STORY HOME
Attachment D
• Photometric Analysis
LIGHTING FIXTURE LEGEND
36W. LED POST LIGHT ON A 16FT POLETYPE IIIUSA# DS8A-PLED-III-20LED-525mA-30K-120V-XWB-1-FINISHRNTS-164-11-RBC (4"DIA) - 3000°KA3A4 C20W. LED BOLLARD LIGHT - 36" TALLUSA# TLB5-DP-18LED-350mA-WW 20" DIA.
36W. LED POST LIGHT ON A 16FT POLETYPE IV- FORWARD THROWUSA# DS8A-PLED-IVFT-20LED-525mA-30K-120V-XWB-1-FINISHRNTS-164-11-RBC (4"DIA) - 3000°K 36"7"5.5"HSSHOUSE SIDE SHIELD PER PLAN.NOT ALL FIXTURES WILL HAVE A SHIELD.
A1LED WALL LIGHT - 1000 LUMEN MIN. AT 3000°KTO BE CONTROLLED BY ASTRONOMICAL TIME CLOCK ONLY.SET DUSK TO DAWN. SELECT BY OWNER.EXTERIOR LED WALL LIGHT - SAME AS ABOVE.AT NON-TYPICAL LOCATIONS. REFER TO SITEPHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR EXACT LOCATIONS.
19.219.819.119.20.82.4
1.05.80.41.51.62.90.54.81.71.5 0.50.80.91.01.01.10.90.91.61.11.31.10.71.41.31.31.50.71.11.71.01.50.90.71.61.11.51.30.61.41.41.11.70.70.91.70.60.71.01.00.91.01.31.41.51.92.21.91.41.10.61.21.71.92.21.81.50.9
1.21.61.61.61.71.41.10.60.40.40.40.50.71.11.61.51.51.51.61.00.5 1.21.21.61.61.41.51.30.90.60.60.60.70.81.31.41.41.61.51.41.20.6
1.11.00.90.91.11.11.00.91.00.90.90.90.91.01.11.10.80.70.4 1.10.60.50.61.11.21.31.21.10.60.70.8 0.80.50.31.21.51.41.41.10.90.91.01.2 1.00.90.31.01.01.10.91.11.5 0.90.91.00.91.01.6 0.90.91.21.01.21.5 1.01.0
1.11.10.91.0 1.00.9
1.41.5 1.21.4
1.31.1 1.01.20.91.4 1.10.91.01.3 1.01.10.90.8 1.10.81.01.1 1.01.31.20.9
1.11.41.01.1 1.10.90.91.3
0.91.11.01.0 1.10.90.80.9 1.01.21.21.0 1.21.41.20.9 1.11.20.91.3 1.41.21.11.3 1.01.01.11.30.80.8 1.61.21.11.2
1.11.2 1.81.11.11.6
1.20.9 1.61.21.11.5
1.01.3 1.11.01.31.20.91.3 1.51.40.90.9 1.11.00.91.0 1.21.41.21.0 1.11.41.21.0
1.01.01.01.3 1.11.21.11.1
0.90.81.01.11.40.80.70.8 1.00.61.52.21.61.41.41.20.80.71.1 0.91.01.61.51.51.51.21.11.00.90.90.9 1.41.21.31.21.31.31.31.10.91.11.01.7 1.21.01.11.00.91.01.21.41.61.1 1.10.80.90.80.91.11.21.91.10.80.91.11.01.31.21.01.11.41.21.11.31.51.61.61.51.71.61.71.31.51.21.20.60.70.3 A4A4
A3
A4
A1
DDDD
CCC
A3 A3
A4A4HSS
HSS
HSS
HSSA1
HSS
LIGHTING DESIGN | ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING27201 Calle JuanitaDana Point, CA 92624Ph. 949.201.1333candelaengineering.com49 UNITSPRODUCTION SITE LIGHTING PLANINTRACORP SW, LLCTUSTIN, CA901 E. KATELLA AVENUE895 DOVE STREET, SUITE 400NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660EMILIE SIMARD (626) 724-5923 1SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLANNORTH
Attachment E
• Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 1
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NUMBER (1882-22) PROJECT NAME: 901 East Katella Avenue Residential Development Project
PROJECT LOCATION: 901 East Katella Avenue, City of Orange, County of Orange, California 92867 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project proposes to demolish all on site improvements and construct 49 new paired and small lot detached homes (17 paired and 15 detached) on the 2.71-acre Project site, including four open space and recreation areas and guest parking. To accommodate this proposal, a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change are requested. The General Plan Amendment would change the land use designation from General Commercial (GC) to Medium Density Residential (MDR). The Zone Change would change the zoning classification from Commercial Professional (C-P) to Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) with application of Small Lot Subdivision Development Standards (OMC 17.14.270). The proposed community would have a density of 18.1 dwelling units per acre (du/ac), approximately the midpoint of the Medium Density Residential Zone, which provides for densities of 15.1 to 24.0 dwelling unit per acre.
LEAD AGENCY: City of Orange
CONTACT PERSON/ TELEPHONE NO.: Monique Schwartz, Senior Planner/ (714) 744-7224
APPLICANT: Intracorp, SoCal-1, LLC
CONTACT PERSON/ TELEPHONE NO.: Emilie Simard / (949) 724-5923
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
Air Quality
PDF AQ-
1 The project must follow the standard
SCAQMD rules and requirements with regards
to fugitive dust control, which include, but are
not limited to the following:
1. All active construction areas shall be
watered two (2) times daily.
2. Speed on unpaved roads shall be reduced
to less than 15 mph.
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 2
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
3. Any visible dirt deposition on any public
roadway shall be swept or washed at the site
access points within 30 minutes.
4. Any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or
other dusty material shall be covered or
watered twice daily.
5. All operations on any unpaved surface
shall be suspended if winds exceed 15 mph.
6. Access points shall be washed or swept
daily.
7. Construction sites shall be sandbagged for
erosion control.
8. Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers
according to manufacturers’ specifications to
all inactive construction areas (previously
graded areas inactive for 10 days or more).
9. Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or
other loose materials, and maintain at least 2
feet of freeboard space in accordance with the
requirements of California Vehicle Code
(CVC) section 23114.
10. Use gravel aprons and track out grates at
all truck exits.
11. Replace the ground cover of disturbed
areas as quickly as possible.
PDF AQ-
2 All diesel construction equipment should have
Tier 4 low emission “clean diesel” engines
(OEM or retrofit) that include diesel oxidation
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 3
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
catalysts and diesel particulate filters that meet
the latest CARB best available control
technology.
PDF AQ-
3 Construction equipment should be maintained
in proper tune.
PDF AQ-
4 All construction vehicles should be prohibited
from excessive idling. Excessive idling is
defined as five (5) minutes or longer.
PDF AQ-
5 Minimize the simultaneous operation of
multiple construction equipment units, to the
maximum extent feasible.
PDF AQ-
6 The use of heavy construction equipment and
earthmoving activity should be suspended
during Air Alerts when the Air Quality Index
reaches the “Unhealthy” level.
PDF AQ-
7 Establish an electricity supply to the
construction site and use electric powered
equipment instead of diesel-powered
equipment or generators, where feasible.
PDF AQ-
8 Establish staging areas for the construction
equipment that are as far from adjacent
residential homes, as feasible.
PDF AQ-
9 Use haul trucks with on-road engines instead
of off-road engines for on-site hauling.
PDF AQ-
10 The project must comply with the mandatory
requirements of the California Building
Standards Code, Title 24, Part 6 (Energy Code)
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 4
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
and Part 11 (CALGreen), including, but not
limited to:
• Install low-flow fixtures and toilets, water-
efficient irrigation systems, drought
tolerant/native landscaping, and reduce the
amount of turf.
• Provide the necessary infrastructure to
support electric vehicle charging.
• Provide solar installations (or other
sources of on -site renewable energy) per
the prescribed Energy Design Ratings.
PDF AQ-
11 Participate in the local waste management
recycling and composting programs.
Biological Resources
MM BIO-
1 Prior to ground disturbances that would impact
potentially suitable nesting habitat for avian
species, the project applicant shall adhere to
the following:
1. Vegetation removal activities shall be
scheduled outside the nesting season
(September 1 to February 14 for
songbirds; September 1 to January 14 for
raptors) to the extent feasible to avoid
potential impacts to nesting birds and/or
ground nesters.
Prior to Ground
Disturbances –
Applicant/
Construction
Contractor
Prior to Ground
Disturbances –
City
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 5
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
2. Any construction activities that occur
during typical nesting season (February 15
to August 31 for songbirds; January 15 to
August 31 for raptors) will require that all
suitable habitat, on-site and within 300-
feet surrounding the site (as feasible), be
thoroughly surveyed for the presence of
nesting birds by a qualified biologist
before commencement ground
disturbances. If active nests are identified,
the biologist would establish buffers
around the vegetation (500 feet for raptors
and sensitive species, 200 feet for non-
raptors/non-sensitive species). All work
within these buffers would be halted until
the nesting effort is finished (i.e. the
juveniles are surviving independent from
the nest). The onsite biologist would
review and verify compliance with these
nesting boundaries and would verify the
nesting effort has finished. Work can
resume within these areas when no other
active nests are found. Alternatively, a
qualified biologist may determine that
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 6
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
construction can be permitted within the
buffer areas and would develop a
monitoring plan to prevent any impacts
while the nest continues to be active (eggs,
chicks, etc.). Upon completion of the
survey and any follow-up construction
avoidance management, a report shall be
prepared and submitted to City for
mitigation monitoring compliance record
keeping
Geology and Soils
MM
GEO-1
The Project Applicant shall implement the
recommendations contained in the report
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration
Evaluation for Proposed 49 -Unit Residential
Development, 901 E. Katella Avenue, City of
Orange, Orange County, California, dated June
3, 2022, and prepared by GeoTek, Inc.
(Appendix D) to reduce geologic hazards
during implementation of the proposed Project.
Included in the reports are site -specific
recommendations involving such topics as,
grading and earthwork, slope stability, retaining
walls, seismic design, construction materials,
geotechnical observation, and testing and plan
reviews.
Pre ground
disturbances –
Applicant/
Geotechnical
Engineer
Plan Check –
Applicant/ City
Geotechnical
Engineer
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 7
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
MM
GEO-2
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the
Applicant shall prepare a final geotechnical
report based on the final rough grading plans
and the final geotechnical report shall
incorporate all of the recommendations
included in the preliminary geotechnical reports
included in Appen dix D. The geotechnical
reports included in Appendix D have
established that the site is geotechnically
suitable for development and a final
geotechnical report is required to ensure all
construction-level geotechnical
recommendations and design parameters are
included on the final rough grading plans.
Prior to grading
permit –
Applicant/
Geotechnical
Engineer
Prior to grading
permit –
Applicant/ City
Geotechnical
Engineer
MM
PALEO-1
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the
Applicant shall prepare for City review and
approval a Paleontological Mitigation
Monitoring Plan, as follows:
1. Prior to initiation of any grading, drilling,
and/or excavation activities, a
preconstruction meeting will be held and
attended by the paleontologist of record,
representatives of the grading contractor
and subcontractors, the project owner or
developer, and a representative of the lead
agency. The nature of potential
Prior to grading
permit –
Applicant/
Cultural
Consultant
Prior to grading
permit – City
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 8
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
paleontological resources shall be
discussed, as well as the protocol that is to
be implemented following discovery of
any fossiliferous materials.
2. Monitoring of mass grading and
excavation activities shall be performed by
a qualified paleontologist or
paleontological monitor. Monitoring will
be conducted full-time in areas of grading
or excavation in undisturbed sediments of
Pleistocene old alluvial fan deposits
starting at a depth of five feet. The project
paleontologist should have the discretion
of adjusting the monitoring schedule based
on any changing geological conditions
observed during monitoring.
3. Paleontological monitors will be equipped
to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to
avoid construction delays. The monitor
must be empowered to temporarily halt or
divert equipment to allow removal of
abundant or large specimens in a timely
manner. Monitoring may be reduced if the
potentially fossiliferous units are not
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 9
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
present in the subsurface or, if present, are
determined upon exposure and
examination by qualified paleontological
personnel to have low potential to contain
fossil resources.
4. Paleontological salvage during trenching
and boring activities is typically from the
generated spoils and does not delay the
trenching or drilling activities. Fossils are
collected and placed in cardboard flats or
plastic buckets and identified by field
number, collector, and date collected.
Notes are taken on the map location and
stratigraphy of the site, and the site is
photographed before it is vacated and the
fossils are removed to a safe place. On
mass grading projects, any discovered
fossil site is protected by red flagging to
prevent it from being overrun by
earthmovers (scrapers) before salvage
begins. Fossils are collected in a similar
manner, with notes and photographs being
taken before removing the fossils. Precise
location of the site is determined with the
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 10
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
use of handheld Global Positioning
System units. If the site involves a large
terrestrial vertebrate, such as large bone(s)
or a mammoth tusk, that is/are too large to
be easily removed by a single monitor, a
fossil recovery crew will excavate around
the find, encase the find within a plaster
and burlap jacket, and remove it after the
plaster is set. For large fossils, use of the
contractor’s construction equipment is
solicited to help remove the jacket to a
safe location before it is returned to the
laboratory facility for preparation.
5. Isolated fossils are collected by hand,
wrapped in paper, and placed in temporary
collecting flats or five-gallon buckets.
Notes are taken on the map location and
stratigraphy of the site, and the site is
photographed before it is vacated and the
fossils are removed to a safe place.
6. Particularly small invertebrate fossils
typically represent multiple specimens of a
limited number of organisms, and a
scientifically suitable sample can be
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 11
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
obtained from one to several five-gallon
buckets of fossiliferous sediment. If it is
possible to dry-screen the sediment in the
field, a concentrated sample may consist
of one or two buckets of material. For
vertebrate fossils, the test is usually the
observed presence of small pieces of bones
within the sediments. If present, multiple
five-gallon buckets of sediment can be
collected and returned to a separate facility
to wet-screen the sediment.
7. In accordance with the “Microfossil
Salvage” section of the Society of
Vertebrate Paleontology guidelines
(2010:7), bulk sampling and screening of
fine-grained sedimentary deposits
(including carbonate-rich paleosols) must
be performed if the deposits are identified
to possess indications of producing fossil
“microvertebrates” in order to test the
feasibility of the deposit to yield fossil
bones and teeth.
8. In the laboratory, individual fossils are
cleaned of extraneous matrix, any breaks
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 12
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
are repaired, and the specimen, if needed,
is stabilized by soaking in an archivally
approved acrylic hardener (e.g., a solution
of acetone and Paraloid B-72).
9. Preparation of recovered specimens to a
point of identification and permanent
preservation (not display), including
screen-washing sediments to recover small
invertebrates and vertebrates. Preparation
of individual vertebrate fossils is often
more time-consuming than for
accumulations of invertebrate fossils.
10. Identification and curation of specimens
into a professional, accredited public
museum repository with a commitment to
archival conservation and permanent
retrievable storage (e.g., OC Parks in
Santa Ana, California). The
paleontological program should include a
written repository agreement prior to the
initiation of mitigation activities. The lead
agency may select another repository if it
so desires.
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 13
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
11. Preparation of a final monitoring and
mitigation report of findings and
significance, including lists of all fossils
recovered and necessary maps and
graphics to accurately record their original
location(s). The report, when submitted to
and accepted by the appropriate lead
agency, will signify satisfactory
completion of the project program to
mitigate impacts to any potential
nonrenewable paleontological resources
(i.e., fossils) that might have been lost or
otherwise adversely affected without such
a program in place
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
MM
HAZ-1
Prior to the demolition of existing structures, a
survey for asbestos containing materials
(ACM), lead based paint (LBP), and
polychlorinated biphenyl (PCBs) shall be
conducted, and any such materials shall be
removed and disposed of properly by qualified
certified technicians in accordance with State
regulations.
Prior to and
during
demolition –
Applicant/
Professional
Prior to and
during
demolition –
City
Noise
PDF NOI-
1 The project will need to comply with California
Title 24 building insulation requirements for
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 14
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
exterior walls, roofs, and common separating
assemblies (e.g. floor/ceiling assemblies and
demising walls), which shall be reviewed by the
City prior to issuance of a building permit.
• Interior noise levels due to exterior
sources must not exceed a community
noise equivalent level (CNEL) or a day -
night level (LDN) of 45 dBA, in any
habitable room.
• Party wall assembly designs must
provide a minimum STC of 50, based on
lab tests. Field tested assemblies must
provide a minimum noise isolation class
(NIC) of 45.
PDF NOI-
2 A “windows closed” condition is expected to be
required for all residential units within the
project site to meet the interior noise standard.
To accommodate windows closed conditions,
all units shall be equipped with adequate fresh
air ventilation, per the requirements of the
California Building Standards.
PDF NOI-
3 Upgraded windows and sliding glass doors with
a minimum STC rating of 32 or greater are
expected to be required for all units facing
Cambridge Street and Katella Avenue.
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 15
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
PDF NOI-
4 Deliveries, loading and unloading activities,
and trash pick -up hours should be limited to
daytime hours only (7 a.m. – 10 p.m.).
PDF NOI-
5 Engine idling time for all delivery vehicles and
moving trucks to 5 minutes or less.
PDF NOI-
6 Construction-related noise shall take place only
between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
Monday through Saturday, and 9:00 a.m. to
8:00 p.m. on Sundays and Federal holidays.
PDF NOI-
7 Provide public notifications and signage in
readily visible locations along the perimeter of
construction sites that indicate the dates and
duration of construction activities, as well as
provide a telephone number where neighbors
can enquire about the construction process and
register complaints to a designated construction
noise disturbance coordinator.
PDF NOI-
8 All construction equipment shall be equipped
with muffles and other suitable noise
attenuation devices (e.g., engine shields).
PDF NOI-
9 Establish an electric connection to the site to
avoid the use of diesel - and gas -powered
generators, if feasible.
PDF NOI-
10 Locate staging area, generators, and stationary
construction equipment as far from the adjacent
residential homes as feasible.
PDF NOI-
11 Construction-related equipment, including
heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, and
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 16
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
portable equipment, shall be turned off when
not in use for more than 5 minutes.
Transportation and Traffic
MM
TRANS-1
The Project Applicant shall install striping
modifications or signage to prohibit the
southbound left turn movement from
Cambridge Street into the Project.
Before final
approved
grading/
construction
plans –
Applicant/City
Before final
approved
grading/
construction
plans – City
Tribal Cultural Resource
MM TRC-
1 A. The project applicant/lead agency shall
retain a Native American Monitor from or
approved by the Gabrieleño Band of
Mission Indians – Kizh Nation and the
Gabrielino/Tongva Nation. The monitors
shall be retained prior to the commencement
of any “ground -disturbing activity” for the
subject project at all project locations (i.e.,
both on-site and any off -site locations that
are included in the project
description/definition and/or required in
connection with the project, such as public
improvement work). “Ground -disturbing
activity” shall include, but is not limited to,
demolition, pavement removal, potholing,
auguring, grubbing, tree removal, b oring,
grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching.
Prior to Ground
Disturbances –
Applicant and
Native American
Monitor
Prior to Ground
Disturbances –
City and Native
American
Monitor
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 17
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
B. A copy of the executed monitoring
agreements with Gabrieleño Band of
Mission Indians – Kizh Nation and
Gabrielino/Tongva Nation shall be
submitted to the lead agency prior to the
earlier of the commencement of any ground-
disturbing activity, or the issuance of any
permit necessary to commence a ground -
disturbing activity.
C. The monitors will complete daily
monitoring logs that will provide
descriptions of the relevant ground -
disturbing activities, the typ e of
construction activities performed, locations
of ground -disturbing activities, soil types,
cultural-related materials, and any other
facts, conditions, materials, or discoveries
of significance to the Tribe. Monitor logs
will identify and describe any discovered
TCRs, including but not limited to, Native
American cultural and historical artifacts,
remains, places of significance, etc.,
(collectively, tribal cultural resources, or
“TCR”), as well as any discovered Native
American (ancestral) human remain s and
burial goods. Copies of monitor logs will be
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 18
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
provided to the project applicant/lead
agency upon written request to the Tribes.
D. On-site tribal monitoring shall conclude
upon the latter of the following (1) written
confirmation to the Kizh and
Gabrielino/Tongva Nation from a
designated point of contact for the project
applicant/lead agency that all ground -
disturbing activities and p hases that may
involve ground-disturbing activities on the
project site or in connection with the project
are complete; or (2) a determination and
written notification by the Kizh and
Gabrielino/Tongva Nation to the project
applicant/lead agency that no fu ture,
planned construction activity and/or
development/construction phase at the
project site possesses the potential to impact
Kizh and Gabrielino/Tongva Nation TCRs.
MM TRC-
2 A. Upon discovery of any TCRs, all
construction activities in the immediate
vicinity of the discovery shall cease (i.e., not
less than the surrounding 50 feet) and shall
not resume until the discovered TCR has
been fully assessed by the Kizh monitor
and/or Kizh archaeologist. The Kizh will
During Grading
– Applicant/
Cultural Monitor
During Grading
– City
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 19
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
recover and retain all discovered TCRs in
the form and/or manner the Tribe deems
appropriate, in the Tribe’s sole disc retion,
and for any purpose the Tribe deems
appropriate, including for educational,
cultural and/or historic purposes.
MM TRC-
3 A. Native American human remains are
defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an
inhumation or cremation, and in any state of
decomposition or skeletal completeness.
Funerary objects, called associated grave
goods in Public Resources Code Section
5097.98, are also to be treated according to
this statute.
B. If Native American human remains and/or
grave goods are discovered or recognized on
the project site, then Public Resource Code
5097.9 as well as Health and Safety Code
Section 7050.5 shall be followed.
C. Human remains and grave/burial goods
shall be treat ed alike per California Public
Resources Code section 5097.98(d)(1) and
(2).
D. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the
preferred manner of treatment for
During Grading
– Applicant/
Cultural Monitor
During Grading
– City
Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 20
901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, City of Orange
No.
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Implementation
Time Frame
and Responsible
Party for
Monitoring
Verification of Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
discovered human remains and/or burial
goods.
E. Any discovery of human remains/burial
goods shall be kept confidential to prevent
further disturbance.
Attachment F
• Draft IS/MND
901 East Katella Avenue Residential Development Project
INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARIATION NO.
1882-22
Lead Agency:
City of Orange
Community Development Department • Planning Division
300 East Chapman Avenue
Orange, CA 92866-1591
(714) 744 - 7220
(714) 744 - 7222 (Fax)
www.cityoforange.org
Prepared by:
Carlson Strategic Land Solutions
27134A Paseo Espada, Suite 323
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
(949) 542 - 7043
Date:
October 20, 2023
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1.0 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 1 Section 2.0 Existing Setting ................................................................................................................. 2
2.1 Regional Setting ......................................................................................................................... 2
2.2 Existing Site Conditions............................................................................................................. 2
2.3 Surrounding Land Uses .............................................................................................................. 7 Section 3.0 Project Description ........................................................................................................... 7
3.1 Intended Use of the IS/MND ................................................................................................... 18
3.2 Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required (Responsible or Trustee Agencies): .... 18
3.3 Scheduled Public Meetings or Hearings: ................................................................................. 18 Section 4.0 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ................................................................ 20
4.1 Determination........................................................................................................................... 20 Section 5.0 Environmental Checklist ................................................................................................ 21
5.1 Aesthetics ................................................................................................................................. 21
5.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources ......................................................................................... 25
5.3 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................... 28
5.4 Biological Resources................................................................................................................ 34
5.5 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................................... 38
5.6 Energy ...................................................................................................................................... 41
5.7 Geology and Soils .................................................................................................................... 43
5.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...................................................................................................... 50
5.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials............................................................................................ 53
5.10 Hydrology and Water Quality .................................................................................................. 58
5.11 Land Use and Planning ............................................................................................................ 63
5.12 Mineral Resources.................................................................................................................... 65
5.13 Noise ........................................................................................................................................ 67
5.14 Population and Housing ........................................................................................................... 73
5.15 Public Service .......................................................................................................................... 75
5.16 Recreation ................................................................................................................................ 79
5.17 Transportation/Traffic .............................................................................................................. 81
5.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................ 87
5.19 Utilities and Service Systems ................................................................................................... 91
5.20 Wildfire .................................................................................................................................... 95
5.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance ........................................................................................ 97 Section 6.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program .......................................................... 99
FIGURES
Figure 1: Regional Location Map ............................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2: Project Location Map ................................................................................................................ 4 Figure 3: General Plan Land Use Designation ......................................................................................... 5 Figure 4: Zoning Classification ................................................................................................................ 6 Figure 5: Conceptual Site Plan ................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 6: Tentative Tract Map .................................................................................................................. 9 Figure 7: Proposed Elevations -Katella and Cambridge ......................................................................... 10
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page iii
Figure 8: Proposed Elevations -Street Scene and Plan 2 ........................................................................ 11 Figure 9: Proposed Elevations – Plan 2A and 2B................................................................................... 12 Figure 10: Proposed Elevations – Building I and IA .............................................................................. 13 Figure 11: Proposed Elevations – Building IB ....................................................................................... 14 Figure 12: Proposed Elevations – Plan 3 SFD and 3A ........................................................................... 15 Figure 13: Proposed Elevations – Plan 3B ............................................................................................. 16 Figure 14: Proposed Landscaping .......................................................................................................... 19
TABLES
Table 1. Floor Plan Summary ................................................................................................................... 7 Table 2. SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds ...................................................................... 28 Table 3. SCAQMD Localized Significance Thresholds (LST) .............................................................. 29 Table 4. Daily Construction Emissions .................................................................................................. 31 Table 5. Daily Operational Emissions .................................................................................................... 32 Table 6. Construction Localized Emissions ........................................................................................... 32 Table 7. Operational Localized Emissions ............................................................................................. 33 Table 8. Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................. 51 Table 9. Operational and Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions .................................................................. 51 Table 10. Peak Discharge Rates Q25 and Q100 for Existing and Proposed Conditions ........................... 60 Table 11. Construction Noise Levels at Neighboring Properties ........................................................... 69 Table 12. Daytime Cumulative Noise Impacts ....................................................................................... 70 Table 13. Nighttime Cumulative Noise Impacts .................................................................................... 70
APPENDICES
Appendix A Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study
Appendix B Biological Resources Assessment
Appendix C Cultural Resources Assessment
Appendix D Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation Appendix E Paleontological Assessment
Appendix F Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report Appendix G Preliminary Hydrology Study
Appendix H Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Appendix I Noise Impact Study
Appendix J Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
Appendix K Trip Generation Analysis
Appendix L Sight Distance Analysis
Appendix M Will Serve letters
Appendix N Sewer Capacity Study
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 1
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1882-22 Project Title:
901 East Katella Avenue Residential
Development Project
Reference Application Numbers:
General Plan Amendment No. 0004 -22, Zone Change No.
1307-22, Tentative Tract Map No. 0051-22, Major Site Plan Review No. 1111-22, and Design Review No. 5092-22
Lead Agency:
City of Orange
Contact Person and Telephone No.:
Monique Schwartz [email protected]
(714) 744-7224
Project Proponent and Address:
Intracorp SoCal-1, LLC
895 Dove Street, Suite 400
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Contact Person and Telephone No.:
Emilie Simard [email protected]
(949) 724-5923
Project Location:
901 E. Katella Avenue
Orange, California 92867
Existing General Plan Designation:
General Commercial (GC)
Existing Zoning Classification:
Commercial Professional (C-P)
SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION
The City of Orange (City), as the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), has prepared this Initial Study (IS) for the 901 East Katella Avenue Residential Development Project (Project). The information contained in the Initial Study was used by the City of Orange to evaluate and determine potential impacts associated with the Proposed Project as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Orange Local CEQA Guidelines.
This IS assesses the environmental effects of the proposed 901 East Katella Avenue Residential Development Project, located on approximately 2.71 acres at 901 East Katella Avenue in the City of Orange. The property is located at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and North Cambridge Street. The site is currently developed with one abandoned commercial building of approximately 20,000 square feet, which was formerly used as commercial use and wireless communication facility. The Project propo ses a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to redevelop the site as a for -sale residential community with 49 paired and detached small lot homes.
The preparation of an IS/MND is governed by two principal sets of documents: CEQA (Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 21000, et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations [CCR] Section 15000, et seq.). Specifically, State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063 (“Initial Study”) and Sections 15070–15075 (“Negative Declaration Process”) guide the process for the preparation of an IS/MND. Where appropriate and supportive to an understanding of the issues, reference is made either to the statute, the State CEQA Guidelines, or appropriate case law. As mandated by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15105, affected public agencies and the interested public may submit comments on the Draft IS/MND. Comments will be responded to in writing.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 2
This IS/MND and its appendices have been prepared in compliance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15071. This IS/MND contains (1) a brief description of the proposed Project, (2) the proposed Project location, (3) proposed findings that the proposed Proje ct would not have a significant effect on the environment, (4) a copy of the IS/Environmental Checklist documenting support for the findings, and (5) all mitigation measures to be implemented. When combined with the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, this serves as the environmental document for the proposed Project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA (Public Resources Code 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Section 15000, et seq.).
SECTION 2.0 EXISTING SETTING
2.1 Regional Setting
The approximately 2.71-acre site is located in the County of Orange, California, on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Map Orange Quadrangle topographic map within Township 4 south, Range 9 west, and Section 20. The Project site is located on the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and Cambridge Street at 901 East Katella Avenue in the City of Orange ( Figures 1 and 2). The Project site is surrounded by residential uses to the north, and commercial uses to the east, south across East Katella Avenue, and west across Cambridge Street.
The Project site includes Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 375-461-41.
2.2 Existing Site Conditions
The site is generally flat and currently developed with an abandoned commercial use. Improvements made to the Project site include a two -story, approximately 27 -foot-tall commercial building totaling approximately 20,621 square feet, asphalt paved parking areas (152 total stalls), and landscaping surrounding the existing building. The commercial building is currently abandoned and has had a history of homeless occupation and small fires. A 53 -foot-tall wireless communications pole is situated immediately to the east of the building. Existing utility boxes and equipment are located along the East Katella Avenue frontage.
There are two existing access points to the Project site. Gated driveway entrances are located off East Katella Avenue and Cambridge Street.
Sidewalks and street trees exist along the East Katella Avenue and Cambridge Street frontages.
Above ground transmission (22.5 kv) electric lines extend along the Cambridge Street frontage to the corner of Cambridge Street and East Katella Avenue. The electric lines turn west along East Katella Avenue away from the Project site.
The entire Project site is su rrounded by an existing block wall, approximately six feet tall. The block wall extends along the northern property line separating the Project site from existing residential uses, along the east property line separating the Project site from existing commercial uses, and along both the East Katella Avenue and Cambridge Street frontages.
An existing bus stop is located along East Katella Avenue near the intersection with Cambridge Street.
The existing General Plan land use designation for the Project site is General Commercial (GC) (Figure 3). The existing Zoning classification is Commercial Professional (C-P) (Figure 4).
Approximate Project Location
I
1 inch = 5,000 feet
0 2,500 5,0001,250
Feet
Bing MapsData Sources:
Figure 1
GIS Prepared By:
Carlson SLS
Created: November 3, 2022
^_
901 E. Katella Project
Regional Map
N.T.S.
N
FIGURE 1
Source: Bing Maps. Regional Location Map
901 E. Katella ProjectI
1 inch = 150 feet
0 50 100 150 200 25025
Feet
Legend
Project Boundary
Bing MapsData Source:
GIS Prepared By:
Carlson SLS
Created: November 3, 2022 Project Location Map
Figure 2
FIGURE 2
Source: Bing Maps. Project Vicinity Map
N.T.S.
N
LU-25 Figure LU-5 Land Use Policy Map
Project
N.T.S.
N
FIGURE 3
Source: City of Orange (2010). General Plan Land Use Designation ·|}þ
·|}þ·|}þ
·|}þ
·|}þ
§¨¦
·|}þ
·|}þ
·|}þ
·|}þ
·|}þ
·|}þ
COUNTY
ORANGE
PARK
ACRES
CITY
NORTH
EL MODENA
COUNTY
COUNTY
EL MODENA
OLIVE
TUSTIN
ANAHEIM
ORANGE
SPHERE OF
INFLUENCE
ANAHEIM
COUNTY
GARDEN
GROVE
SANTA ANA
VILLA PARK
ORANGE
SPHERE OF
INFLUENCE
McPherson
Youth Sport
Facility
Canyon
High
School
Yorba
Middle
School
California
Elementary
School
Serrano
Elementary
School
Handy
Elementary
School
Fletcher
Elementary
Linda Vista
Elementary
School
Anaheim Hills
Elementary
School
Esplanade
Elementary
School
Jordan
Elementary
School
Santiago
Charter
School
McPherson
Magnet
School
Career
Education
Center
Richland
High
School
La Veta
Elementary
School
Palmyra
Elementary
School
Portola
Middle
School
Lampson
Elementary
School
West Orange
Elementary
School
Riverdale
Elementary
School
Olive
Elementary
School
Imperial
Elementary
School
Sycamore
Elementary
School
Santiago
Canyon
College
Canyon Rim
Elementary
School
Panorama
Elementary
School
El Modena
High
School
Orange
High
School
Villa Park
High
School
Cerro Villa
Middle
School
Taft
Elementary
School
Villa Park
Elementary
Chapman Hills
Elementary
School
Fairhaven
Elementary School
Cambridge
Elementary
School Prospect
Elementary
School
Nohl Canyon
Elementary
School
Chapman
University
Lincoln
Park
Pioneer
Park
Juarez
Park
Boysen
Park
Ponderosa
Park
El Camino
Real
Park
Santa Fe
Depot
Park
Shaffer
Park
Olive
Park
Pitcher
Park
Yorba
Park
La Veta
Park
Grijalva
Community
Park
El
Modena
Park
Olive Hills
Park
Belmont
Park
Pelanconi
Park
Imperial
Park
Serrano
Park
Cerro Villa
Park
Oak
Park
Canyon
Rim
Park
Rio Vista
Park
Killefer
Park
Santiago Oaks
Regional Park
and Nature Center
Fred Barrera
Park
Eisenhower
Park
Handy
Park
Santiago
Hills
Park
Hart
Park
Irvine
Regional
Park
Peters Canyon
Regional
Park
Main
Library
Water
Plant
Corporation
Yard
Library
Taft
Branch
Police
Headquarter
City
Hall
Library
Main
Place
U.S.
Post
Office
Anaheim Hills
Golf Course
Oak Canyon
Nature
Center
Holy
Sepulcher
Cemetery
Fairhaven
Memorial
Park
Crystal
Cathedral
Edison
Substation
Fire
Stn 8
Fire
Stn 5
Fire
Stn 4
Fire
Stn 3
Fire
Stn 2
Fire
Stn 1
C.H.O.C.
St. Joseph
Hospital
Chapman
Medical
Center
Weir
Canyon
Regional
Park
El
Modena
Branch
The Island
Golf
Center
Super Sport
Golf & Recreation
Center
IRWD
Santiago Hills
Reservoir
Santiago Canyon
Landfill
Police
Dept
The Village
at
Orange
Formerly
Ridgeline
Country
Club
Fire
Stn 7
Fire
Stn 6
UCI
Medical
Center
Honda
Center
Anaheim
Stadium
PETERS
CANYON
RESERVOIR
VILLA
PARK
DAM
The
Outlets
at
Orange
Metrolink
Parking
Structure
MOUNTAIN V IEW AVE
VIA HILO DR
STA TE COLLEGE BLVD
VIA MAUI
MANCHES TE R A VE
CHRIS LN
ANAHEIM BLVDVIA TAHITI
BETMOR LN
SANTA CRUZ ST
VIA KONA DR
CITRUS DR
GENE AUTRY WAY GENE AUTRY WAY
WAKEFIELD AV E
TANGERINE LN
VIA DEL RAY
MOUNTAIN V IEW AVE
LEATRICE L NLEATRICE L N
RIV ERA LN
STA NFORD CT SANTA CRUZ ST
PEARSON A VE
NA UTICAL ST
JETTY DR
SPINNAKER ST
ORANGEW OOD A VE ORANGEW OOD A VE
ORANGEW OOD A VE
MOUNTAIN V IEW AVE
SIMMONS A VE SIMMONS A VE
TILLER AV E TILLER AV E
SIRIUS AVE SIRIUS AVE
COMPTON AVE
JETTY DR
SUNNINGDA LE CIR
CHAP MAN AVE CHAP MAN AVE CHAP MAN AVE
LEWIS ST
MEDICA L CE NTER DRLAGUNA ST
THE CITY DR
ADRIA N S T
LEWIS ST
SALERNO S T
DA WN WAYANZIO ST
DA WN AVE
GREENTRE E AVE
METROPOLITAN DR
ADRIA N CIR
LEW
IS
ST
GARDEN GROVE BLVD
LORETTA LN
CHAP MAN AVE
MILLS DR ROBIN RDMARKS WAY
MILLS DR
ANITA DR
ALMOND AVE
LOUISE PL
FLOWER ST
CA STLE CIR
CA RME N CIR
CA MILLE CIR
MARIE PL
LARKSPUR DR
PALMYRA A VE
FLOWER ST
DE VON RD
CULVE R A VE
FLOWER ST
PLUM LN
FLOWER ST
FLOWER CIR
SILKTRE E CIR
DE VON RD
SHERWOOD LN FALLB ROOK DR
FAIRBROOK LN
ORANGE RD
CORRIGAN AVE
BRISTOL ST
FLOWER ST
OLIVE LN
LOWELL LN
FREEMA N L NSHERWIN LN
MEMORY LN
ECKHOFF ST
ORANGEW OOD A VE
ORANGEW OOD A VE
DUPONT DR
DUPONT DR
CHERRY DR
CE DA R S T
ASH ST
STE VENS STFLOWER ST
BITTERBUSH ST
PALM AVE PALM AVE WILLOW A VE
HE MLOCK ST
RA MPART S T
DONNE YBROOKE ST
MAPLE AV E
ARBOR WAY
BITTERBUSH ST
STE VENS ST
ECKHOFF ST
SUNB URST WA Y
BELHAVEN S TOMEGA AVE
LARK ELLEN LN
TAFT AVESUNKIST
ST
CA RL S T
SHIRLE Y ST
SANDERSON AV E
SUNK IST S T
PAGE CT
STA DIUM VIEW AVE
SINCLA IR S T
KATELLA AV E
KATELLA AVE
DOUGLAS S T
KRAEMER BLV D
VIA LUCERA
JACKSON AVE
VIA PORTO
VIA FERRA RI
TREVOR STBETH CIR
KINGSLEY ST
JEANINE WA Y
ALICE CIRBETH CIR
KINGSLEY ST
LINCOLN A VE
CRYS TAL V IEW AV E
SOUTH S T
BROOK SHIRE AVE
CINDA ST
BRENTWOOD AV EBRENTWOOD AV E
G
LAS
SELL
ST
WESTWAY A VE
CINDA ST
GREENWAY AVE
FLETCHER AVE
CULLY DR
BAYWOOD AV E
SOUTHE RN A VE
PACIFIC ST
MEATS AVE
BATAVIA ST
BLUERIDGE AV E
BLUERIDGE AVE
NE VILLE ST
CA SE ST
BATAVIA ST
NE VILLE ST
LIME ST
ST. THOMAS CIR
TAFT AVE
TAFT AVE
MAIN ST
LESLIE WA Y
BRIAN ST
LEVERS PLYALE AV E
BATAVIA ST
MANZANITA ST
MAIN ST
KATELLA AV E
KATELLA AV E
PARKER ST
BATAVIA ST
STRUCK AV E
STRUCK AV E
PARKER ST
BATAVIA ST
LEMON ST
ELM ST
PARKER STMAIN ST
ELM ST
MAIN ST
BARKLEY A VE
BARKLEY AVE
SHELLY CT
CY PRESS S T
LEMON ST
HA RITON ST
ANGUS AVE
ALVAREZ AVE
GLASS ELL ST
BATAVIA ST
MAIN ST
PRIMROSE DR
OLIVE S T
CLA RK ST
PARKER ST
WALNU T AV EORANGEW OOD A VE WALNUT AV E
EMERALD DR
CITRUS ST
CHERRY DR
SYCAMORE AVE
CLA RK STBIRCH AV E
PARKER ST
ELM ST
LIME ST
CITRUS ST
PALM AVE
PALM DR
MAIN ST
LIME ST
ACACIA AVE
MAPLE AV E
PIXLEY S T
PA
RKER ST
CITRUS ST
ATCHISON S T
LEM
ON ST
LESTER DR
JEWE LL PL CY PR
ESS S T
BATAVIA ST
CHAP MAN AVE
LIME ST
CY PRESS S TPIXLEY S T
BUSH ST
ALMOND AVE
WASHINGTON AV E
BUSH ST
FOLEY PL MARIETTA P L
PIXLEY S T
PALMYRA A VEPALMYRA A VE
PALMYRA A VE
COLUMBIA PL
CULVE R A VE CULVE R A VECULVE R A VE
BATAVIA ST
PARKER ST
PIXLEY S T
ALPINE RD
OLIVE S T
MAIN ST
LA VETA AV E
LA VETA AV E
BEDFORD RD
TOWN & COUNTRY RD
MAIN ST
PARKER ST
MEMORYLN
CE NTER ST
HA RW OOD S T WATER ST
SHAFFER ST
ORANGE S T
JAMES ON ST
LINCOLN S T
GARDNER DRPALMYRA A VE
HA RW OOD S T
CE NTER ST
VAN BIBBE R AVE
GREENGROVE DR
CA LIFORNIA STPENN DR
CULVE R A VE
CULVE R A VE
TUSTIN ST
CHALY NN CIR
PINE ST
LA VETA AV E
FAIRWA Y DR
LAKE DR
CA MBRIDGE ST
GREENVIEW DR
ALBION LN
WOODB URY DRCLE MENSEN AVE
BARKLEY A VE
GRAND STORANGE S T
CA MBRIDGE ST
LOMITA AVE
LOMITA AVELOMITA AVE LOMITA AVESHAFFER ST
OAKMONT A VE OAKMONT A VE
W
ARBLER PL
FERN ST
ALTA DRBLUERIDGE AV E
BLUERIDGE AV E
HA RT ST
HIGHLAND S T
DIA MOND ST
OAKFIELD DRHILLCREST AV E HILLCREST AV E
SACRAMENTO ST M
cCRORY
LN
SMOKE WOOD DR
ALMOND AVE
BURLY AVE
WAYFIELD ST
PARK LN
VIOLET LN
PROSPE CT ST
OAK S T
PALMYRA A VE
VIOLET LN
CA ROLE LN
TRACY LN
RUTH PL
DE BORAH LN
LA VETA AV E
RILE S CIR
BALL RD
SHERMAN ST
STA TE COLLEGE BLVD
WINSTON RD
WINSTON RD
ALLEC ST
VERNON ST
CE RRITOS A VE
CE RRITOS A VE
LEWIS ST
HOWELL AV E
HOWELL AV E
CLA UDINA W AY
CHAP MAN AVE
CHAP MAN AVE
FLOWER ST
HOLLY ST
FELDNER RD
MAPLE AV E
VALENCIA CIR
WALKER RANCH CIR
HA ZEL CIR
LEMON ST
SAN RAMON CIR
LAVENDER CT
W ILDROSE DR
CE NTER ST
BLAKE S T
GRAND ST
BRIARDA LE AVE
DE L MAR AVE
GATES AV E
PINE ST
HE ATHERSTONE DR
DIX ON AVE
ST. MORITZ CIR
RUTH PL
COURT ST
PARK ST
HILL S T
SCHUG ST VIA
LA
C
AN
AD
A
PHILO AVE
JUSTICE CIR
LOS ARBOLES A VE
CRAW FORD CANYON RD
BRAE GLE N
LN
LEAFWOOD LN
GRAMERCY DR
GRAMERCY DR
PL
ETON
PL
YOUNG LN
GAFF S T
ENSIGN CIR
VISTA GLEN RD
ROBINHOOD P L
ROBINHOO
D
PL
RIDGECRE ST LN
ROBINHOOD P L
H
ILLM
AN
C
IR
ORANGE HILL RD
TERRACE V IEW CT
ECHO HIL L WAY
VISTA MESA WAY
VISTA PARK A VE
VISTA CIR
SUNK IST S T
CURTIS WAY CLA RK TER CHARLENE TER JAMBOLAYA ST DUTCH A VE
ROYAL PLUNDERHILL AVE
CA ROUSEL ST
POWHATAN AV E
RIO VISTA ST
STA TE COLLEGE BLVD
PEREGRINE S T
CITADEL LN
HIDDEN CANYON RD
VIA EL ES TRIBO
AVENIDA DE SA NTIAGO
HIDDEN CANYON RD
MARCE LLA LN
SIEMON ST
PARK LN
TOWNLEY ST
PATTI LN
FAIRHAVE N AVE FAIRHAVE N AVEOWENS DR
MAIN ST
McEVOY LN
SNOW GOOS E ST
GOLDEN EA GLE A VE
SWALLOW AVE
BLUE JAY AVE
CONDOR CRE ST A VE
GRANADA DR
CHRISTINE ST
CA PISTRA NO PL
PATR IA CT
CORRIDA P L
GLEN ARRAN LN
AVILA PL
VALENCIA DR
ELSINORE A VE
FERNSIDE S T
PADDLE WHEEL CIR
HARTM
A
N
S
T
GLASSELL
ST
DUNTON AVE
GREENLEA F AV E
ORANGE OLIVE RD
JIB ST SWELL ST
SANTA FE P L MAPLE TREE DR
PEPPER HILL DR
IVY HILLLN
ORANGE GROVE AVE
WALNUT AV E
CITRUS ST
EMERALD DR
CY PRESS S T
LEMON ST
ORANGE S T
ORANGE S T
MAYFAIR AVE
OAKMONT AVE
PINE STHA RW OOD S T
HA RW OOD S T
PINE ST
BREEZY WAY
ROMELLE A VE
YORBA S T
LORETTA DR
FAIRHAVE N AVE
STA TE COLLEGE BLVD
ANAHEIM WAY
ANAHEIM WAY
ORANGE CE NTER DR
MANCHES TE R A VE
MANCHES TE R A VE
ORANGEW OOD A VE
MANCHES TE R A VE
OAKMONT A VE
MAYFAIR AVE CA LIFORNIA ST LINCOLN S T
MAYFAIR AVE MAYFAIR AVE MAYFAIR AVESHAFFER ST
CA MBRIDGE ST
EVERETT P L
EVERETT P L EVERETT P LEVERETT P L
LINCOLN S T
ROSE AV EROSE AV E ROSE AV E
CA LIFORNIA ST
CA MBRIDGE ST
TUSTIN STSHAFFER ST
ORANGE GROVE AVELINCOLN S T
MADISON AV E MADISON AV E
GRAND ST
WAVERLY S T
GLASS ELL ST
WALNUT AV E
WALNUT AV E
CE NTER ST
PINE ST
CA MBRIDGE ST
SYCAMORE AVE
SYCAMORE AVE
SYCAMORE AVE
HICKORY LN
SHATTUCK PL
PINE ST
LINCOLN S T
CE NTER ST
CA MBRIDGE ST
MAGNOLIA ST
PALM AVE
PALM AVE
PALM AVE
DA NA PL
MAPLE AV E
MAPLE AV E
GRAND ST CE NTER ST
HA RW O
OD S T
SHAFFE R ST
CLE VEL
AND ST
PINE ST
CA MBRIDGE ST
SHATTU CK PL
WAVERL
Y S T
PALMDALE A VE
LINDENHOL Z ST
MAPLEWOOD ST
MARQUART ST
SILVERWOOD ST
SHAFFER ST
EBONYW OOD S TPALMDALE A VE
TAFT AVE TAFT AVE
CA NDLEW OOD A VE
NORDIC DR
CONCORD A VE
CHES TNUT A VE CHES TNUT A VE
TRENTON AVE TRENTON AVE
BAXTER ST
VANOWE N A VEPINE STHA RW OOD S T
KATELLA AV E KATELLA AV E
LARAMIE ST
COLBOW ST
EL CARMEN AVE
GRAVIER ST
OLYMPIA WAY
CE NTER ST
PEARL ST
CHAP MAN AVE
JOCOTAL A VE
RIDGEWOOD LN
CHURCHIL L L N
OLD LAMPLIGHTER CIR
PATRICIAN DR
DORCHES TE R CIR
HA LLSWORTH CIR
KENWICK DR
JEROME ST
ALMA LN
VILLA PARK RD
VILLA PARK RD
CE NTER DR
MILLER CIR
ROSANNE CIR
FRANCISCO DR
CE NTER DR
CA ROLYN CIR
VIDA DR
PLANTA TION PLNORMANDY DR
SHAKESP EARE STSEVILLE A VE
CA ROUSEL ST
CY PRIEN WAY
CE NTER ST DUTCH A VE
MELINDA CIR BILLIE J
O CIR
T
OWER CT NORMANDY CTOLYMPIA CTLONDON CT ELSIENA W AY
HE MPSTEAD CIRWARD TER
WARD TER
ROYAL PL
WARD TER
WARD TER
PARADISE RDLINCOLN A VEOLANA WA Y
CHANTILLY ST
PARADISE LN
ALLEYCA NON LAKE ALLEY
PONDEROS A ST DE ODAR STMAIN ST
EDGEWOOD RD
FRANZEN AVEEVON LN
FRANZEN AVE
CHERRY ST
ALLEYHA NS LN
ALLEYSTA CY LN
ALLEY
TWE NTY-FOURTH ST
MONICA LN
BEECHWOOD ST TUSTIN AVE
BEECHWOOD ST
BEECHWOOD ST
HA THAWA Y ST
EASTWOOD AVE
LEWIS ST
WRIGHT S T
MERELET LN
YORBA S T
DE LIA LN
ROSALIND DR
LA VETA AV E
HA NDY CREE K RD
ORANGE GROVE AVE
RA INIE R A VE
ORANGE OLIVE RD
HA RTMAN ST
RICHLAND AVE
WOODS ST
RIV ERDA LE AVE
SANTA ANA C ANYON RD
BAINBRIDGE A VE
FAUNA AVE
JACKSON AVE
ALICE WAY
FRONTERA ST
JACKSON AVE
PARK VISTA S T
ALICE CIR
CONNIE CIR QUEENSBURY S T
GREENHEDGE AVE
CERRO VILLADR
LOMA ST
LOMA ST
FREEDOM AVE
SOUTHE RN A VE
SHAFFER ST SHAFFER ST
SANTIAGO
BLVD CA NY ON CIR
CERR
O
VILLADR
BLAIRWOOD LN
BLAIRWOOD LN
MAIN ST
GROVE AVE GROVE AVE
WOODS IDE ST
WINLOCK ST CHOUTEAU S T
LINDENHOL Z ST
SILVERWOOD ST
EBONYW OOD S T
MEATS AVE
SANTIAGO
BLVD
NICHOLS AVE
SAN
LO
R
ENZO
C
T
RUSHMORE ST
SPRING ST
SHASTA ST
DUNAS S T
OLYMPIA WAY
CRAIG DR
KATHLE EN LN
VIOLET LN
ALMOND AVE ALMOND AVE
PALMYRA A VE
CRAIG DR
BURLY AVE
CA ROLET LN
SWIDLER PL
OLYMPIA WAY
WELLINGTON RD
LA VETA AV E
PROSPE CT ST
DUNAS RD
LARKSTONE DR
KIRKWOOD AV
OAKW OOD S T
HE ATHERSTONE ST
CHAP MAN AVE
RE GENCY CIR
MORROW CIR
CHANTILLY ST
CA RDIFF S THILDA S TRE SEDA ST
TURIN AVE PALADIN AVE PALADIN AVE
MARJAN ST
GELID AVE GELID CT GELID CT
VERDE ST
GROVE LAND PLTORRY P L LARAMIE ST WHIDB Y LNRE SEDA ST EVENING STAR DR
CHAUCER ST PEREGRINE P L CLA RE NCE STKEATS ST AMBRIDGE S T
CLIFPARK W AY
ALMONT AVE
HE WES AV
HE WES AV
HARROGATE PL
CONENTRY
PL
CAMD EN DR
WICKFORD DR
BRUNSWICKW
Y
PERIWINKLE DR
SHERRY LYNN DR
COUNTRY HAVE N
COUNTY LN
VILLADELCERRO
HIDEAWAY DR
FENW
ICK
PL
A
M
BERVALE
LN
NEW
PO
RTBLVD
NEW
PORTBLVD
COUNTRY HILLS DR
COWAN HEIGHTS DR
DA NIGER RD
TERRACEVIEW
RANGERVIEW DR
COW AN HEIGHTS DR
EQUESTRIAN DR
HAMBLETONIAN
PL
CRYS TAL V IEW AV E
DUNFIELD ST
D
U
NFIELD
ST
FR
ANK
IST
BORTZ ST
ANCHOR A VE
GALLEY ST
VISTA CT
GLASS ELL ST
ORANGE OLIVE RD
VISTA CT
SANTIA GO B LVD
NA THAN CIR
CY PRESS S T LEMON ST OLIVE S T
GLASS ELL ST
ORANGE S T
GRAND ST CE NTER ST
SHAFFER ST
GLASS ELL STGLASS ELL ST
OLIVE S T
GRAND ST
PINE ST
ALMOND AVE
CHAP MAN AVE
CA MBRIDGE ST WAVERLY S T
HA RW OOD S T
MAPLEWOOD ST
TUSTIN ST
CHAP MAN AVE
TUSTIN ST
CA LIFORNIA ST
SHATTUC
K
PL
HIGHLAND S T
VILLA PARK RD
BLOOMBERRY
CA STLE TOWN
C
AR ISBROOKE
SCOTTS V IEW
HA ZELW OOD
VICKSBERRY
KENWOOD
FLYING E LN
MEADOW LN
MACDONALD LN
DA NIE L LN
ORANGE HILL TER
ROGERS DR
HILLS IDE DR
MEADS AVE
MEADS AVE
HI TOP LN
SHETLA ND LN
VICKIE LN
IVY LN
CLA RK ST
RA NDALL S T
MAGNOLIA ST
MAPLEWOOD ST
PRIVATE
DR
MAGNOLIA AVE
PARK LN
CLOVERDALE A VEDEL MA R AVE
AGATE ST
SERRANO AV E
GROVE AVE
GROVE AVE
GROVE AVE
HIGHLAND S T
CORAL AVE DIA M OND
S
T
CORAL AVE
MARY CIR SANDRA CIRFLORE NCE CIR
PAMELA P L
HE NDERSON WAY
MESA DR
CHARTER RD JAMES CIR
CHRISTINE CIR
FLEE T RD
JAMES RD
VILLA WOODS CIR
ROBB IE CIR
ROBIN WAY
LEIGH CIR
V
ILLA
W
O
OD
S
D
R
JANICE CIR
EASTWOOD CIR
RY AN CIR ALICE LN
SERRANO AV E
D
ERE
K DR DA RON DR
ORCHA RD LN RA GAN CIR
OAKW OOD CIR
ASPEN STVALENCIA ST
LINW OOD S TFRENCH ST SANTIA GO A VEPOINSETTIA STBUSH ST
PASADENA AVE
SPURGEON ST SANTA CLA RA AVE
SANTA CLA RA AVEOAKMONT A VESANTA CLA RA CIR SANTA CLA RA AVE
SANTA CLA RA AVE
BUFFALO A VELEWIS ST
AVALON A VE
BUFFALO A VE
WEBER CIRBUFFALO A VE
BUFFALO A VE
AVALON A VEBUSH ST AVALON A VE
WALNUT AV E
HAMILTON A VE
ROSE AV E
ORANGE GROVE AVE
WAYFIELD ST
MADISON AV E
WALNUT AV E
PARK LN
MILFORD RD
OXFORD CT
BARRINGTON DR
THOMA S ST
BALMORAL DR
PAGE ANT DR
BERKSHIRE CT
EL CARMEN AVE
ESPANITA ST
COLBY ST
EARLHAM ST
EL SALVA DOR AVE
ESPANITA ST
WHITE DOVE AV E
SWAN ST
BLUEBONNET CT
CHAPARRAL CT
TWINLEA F TRL
HOOVE R A VEHOOVE R A VE
GRAND ST WILSON AV EWILSON AV E WILSON AV E
TUSTIN ST
SHAFFER ST
SHATTUCK ST
LINCOLN S T
ADAMS AVE
ADAMS AVE
ADAMS AVE ADAMS AVE
JACKSON AVE
LINCOLN S T
JACARANDA AV E HA RW OOD S TJACARANDA AV E CA LIFORNIA ST
SHAFFER ST
GRAND ST
CLE VELAND ST
CA MBRIDGE ST
LINCOLN S T
WOODV ALE AV E DAR BY ST
TO
RRE
S
ST
TUSTIN ST
LISA PL
HE IM AVE HE IM AVEASHWOOD ST
CA MEO CT
FELLOWS DR
H
A
Y
FO
RD
ST
AMBER AVE
LOVE LN
CA NA L ST
FLAN
DERS ST
ALD
ER
G
ROVE CIR
GLENDORA A VECOMSTOCK ST
BELLBROOK ST
WATERBERRY ST
MILLBRAE ST
GLENDORA A VE
CA NA L ST
VISTA DEL GA VIOTA AV E NORTHUMBERLAND RD
GLENNWOOD ST
VISTA DEL PLAY A AVE
GREENGROVE ST
VISTA DEL PLAY A AVE
VISTA DEL PLAY A AVE
CUMBE RLA ND RD CUMBE RLA ND RD
CA
NA L STEMERSON A VE
ORANG
E OLIVE RD
HA RW OOD S T
CLE VELAND ST
MEATS AVE
NORDIC STLINC
OLN
ST
CHOUTEAU S T
CA MBRIDGE ST
DE L MAR AVEMAPLEWOOD ST
LINDENHOL Z STSILVERWOOD ST
DE L MAR AVE
GROVE AVE
G
REEN
G
R
O
VE
ST
GROVE AVE
NA MURIA S T
GENESS EE STGROVE AVE
GROVE AVE
B LUERIDGE AVE
GLENDALE DR
GLENDALE A VE GL ENDALE AVEGLENDALE A VE
ORANGE OLIVE RD
FERNDALE A VE
WOODS IDE ST WINLOCK ST RIDGEWOOD ST
NORDIC PL SHATTUCK PL
BRIARDA LE AVE
GAYLE ST SAN CARLOS A VE
BEECHWOOD ST
HE ARTHSIDE S T
ILA DR
RA INIE R A VE HA RTMAN ST
SUNV IEW DRBUTTERFIE LD RDPINEWOOD ST
FAIRBA IRN S T
OCEANVIEW ST
GAYLE ST
SKYWOOD ST
BUTTERFIE LD RD
WESTHAVEN ST
BIXBY A VE
PALM AVE
MAGNOLIA AVE
OCEANVIEW AVE
BUENA VISTA ST BUENA VISTA ST
PALM AVEORANGE A VE
MAIN ST
GLASS ELL ST
LINCOLN A VE
OLIVE A VE
OCEANVIEW AVE
TU
STIN
ST
ANCHO
R
AVE
LINCOLN A VE
BOOM AVE
CA NA L ST
ASHWOOD ST
SAIL AVE
ANCHOR A VE
SAIL AVE
ST. JAMES AVE ST. JAMES AVE
BOURBON S T TUSTIN ST
ORANGE OLIVE RD
TORRES ST
CA NA L ST
SANTA ANA CANYON RD
SANTA ANA CANYON RD
PERALTA HILLS DR
VALLEY GATE DR
N
OHL
CAN
YO
N
RD
EMBERWOOD LN
OLIVE B RA NCH WA Y
MOU
NTAIN
GLEN RD
FERNHILL LN
RIDGE GATE RDNOHL RA NCH RD
NOHL RA NCH RD
NOHL CA NY ON RD
SA
NTIAG
O
BLVD
SANTIA GO B LVD
VISTA CANYON RD
ZENITH POINT RD
ORANGE VIEW LN
HE IM AVE
VILLAREAL DR
BAILEY S T
AMOS S T
VILLAREAL DR
FEA THER HILL DR
ALTURA AV E SANTIAGO
BLVD
VILLAREAL DR
STONE PINE RD
VIL LA VISTAW
AY
BRYNMAR LN
MEATS AVE
MOUNTAIN V IEW CIR
MORI LN
AGATE STRIDING WAY
DIA MOND ST
MEATS A VE
DODSON WA Y
MORI LN
OPAL A VEDIAM
O
ND
ST
HIGHLAND S T
TAFT AVETAFT AV E
CA RDINAL CIR
MORN
IN
G
SID
E
ST
FIRESIDE S T
HILLS IDE AVE
PATRICK DR
BISHOP CIR
LAKESIDE A VE
MORNINGSIDE ST
FIRESIDE S T
FERN ST
BROOK SIDE AVE
PARKSIDE A VE M
ORNING
STAR
C
IR
SANTIA GO B LVD
CHES TNUT A VE
CLINTON ST
MILFORD ST
MORNINGSIDE ST
CHES TNUT A VE
HA RT ST
ATHENS A VE
ATHENS A VE
NOBLE ST
ORAN GE GROVE AVE
GLENROSE DR
WRIGHTW OOD DR
RICK S T
EDDINGTON DR
LA NAE CIR
HE ATHERSTONE DR
DE L VALLE A VE
WALNUT AV E
EUCLID AV E
EUCLID AV E
SILVERLEA F AV E
SILVERLEA F AV E
ESPLANADE ST
SYCAMORE AVE
SWIDLER ST
EARLHAM STPALM AVE
PALM AVE
BLACKTHORN LN
GLENROSE ST
WRIGHTW OOD S T
SPRING ST
VINE AVE
VINE ST
CITRUS ST
ENTERPRIS E ST
COLLINS AVE
COLLINS AVE
OLIVE S T
GLASS ELL ST
WILSON AV E
HOOVE R A VE
ELIZA BETH DR
CE NTER ST
MONROE AV E
LOCUST A VE
CE NTER ST
QUINCY AVE
OLD ORCHARD LN
COLLINS AVE
GARDNER DR
QUINCY AVE
SHATTUCK PL
SHATTUCK PL
SHATTUCK PL
CA LIFORNIA ST
CA MBRIDGE ST
CA RLE TON AVE
MONROE AV E
SACRAMENTO ST
BRISTOL LNBRISTOL LN
FLETCHER AVE
HE ARTHSIDE S TBEECHWOOD ST
RE DW OOD A VE
DE NIS E AVE
CLINTON ST
VILLA VISTA W AY
VILLA VISTA W AY
PAM
ICIR
PAM I CIR
P
AM
ICIR
EL SERENO DR
PA
M
ICIR
BRECKENRIDGE ST
RIDING WAY
MAIN ST
GROVE AVE
CA MBRIDGE ST
CA NDLEW OOD A VE
GREENGROVE ST
LINCOLN S T
NORDIC PL
CA NDLEW OOD A VE
SERRANO AVE
STAR PINE RD
SKYVIEWDR
PEACO CK L N
FLOW ER WOOD AVE
DO
GW
O
OD
ST
DEERW
O
O
D
ST
BAKER HILL RD
SAGE WOOD ST
SKYLARK
PL
CANYON VIEW AVE
CANYON VIEW AVE
SAN LUIS DR
BLACKBERRY
COVE
NE WPORT BLVD
NE WPORT BLVD
TEA L LN
GO
LDENSPU
R
W
AY
HIDDEN CANYO
N
WINDY POINTE
CRIOLLO
CIR
PINTOWAY
C
LA
R
ID
G
E
DR
C
AR
LISLE
PL
Q
UAIL LN
BARON CT
FERN ST
ELMWOOD STATHENS A VE
PRADO WOODS DR
SACRAMENTO ST
PRADO CIRTRENTON AVE
RE NA ISSANCE
TRENTON AVE
HA RDING S T
VANOWE N A VE
KATHLE EN LN
VANOWE N A VE
WANDA RD
KATELLA AV E VILLA PARK RD
COVINGTON CIR
BEARDSLEY CIR
HA RT ST
WILSON AV E
WILSON AV E
ADAMS AVE
HA STINGS DRPR
OVIDE
N
C
E
D
R
ADAMS AVE DOROTHY CIR
ABERDEEN LN
QUINCY AVE
QUINCY AVE
TACOMA CIR
JACKSON AVE
BECKLEY CIRMONROE AV E
HIGHLAND S T FITSCHEN RANCH RD
LOCUST A VE
TUSTIN ST
HA NDY S T
HA RT ST
JACARANDA AV E
CLINTON ST
COLLINS AVE COLLINS AVE
BARKLEY A VE
BARKLEY A VE
LOMITA AVE
HA RT ST
LOMITA AVE
OAKMONT A VE
MAYFAIR AVE
VICTORIA DR RUSS ELL DR SHIRLE Y DR
HIGHLAND S T
MAYFAIR AVE
MAYFAIR AVE
CLINTON ST
HA NDY S T
ELMWOOD ST
ROSE AV E
ROSE AV E
HA MILTON A VE
HA RT ST
FERN ST
HA NDY S T
WAYFIELD ST
OAK S T
SYCAMORE AVE
PALM AVE
PALM AVE
VINE AVE
MILFORD RD
DA NA AVE
McPHERSON RD
PEARL AVE
FIRST ST
MALENA ST
YORBA S T
YORBA S T
FAIRMONT WA Y
GARNET AVE
SEBA A VE
ROMELLE A VE
TUSTIN ST
EXETER PL
STE ARNS DR
ROSALIND DR
STE ARNS AVE
LORETTA DR
JAMES ST
ALMOND AVE
WASHINGTON AV E
WASHINGTON AV E
DUNAS S T
OLYMPIA WAY
SHASTA ST
THOMA S ST
PALMYRA A VE
ROBERTA DR
JAMES ST
RUTH PL
JORDAN AV E
WOODLA ND S T
HE WES ST
ROMELLE A VE
DUNAS RD
EARLHAM ST
PALOMA R W AY
FAIRHAVE N AVE
FAIRHAVE N AVE
CHARTER OA K DR
RICK S T
LA NAE CIR
LACONIA DR
CA THERINE CIR
ANTONIO CIR
CHEY ENNE ST
SONORA CIR
STE TSON LN
FE R NANDO
CIR
CERRO VILL A DR
M
ONTE
VISTACIR
SMOKE TREE CIR
EL RITO DR
R
A
M
A
S
T
ROLLING GREEN LN
EL MORO WAY
ROSENAU DR
SUMMITRIDGE LN
QUEENS GATE WAY
TRITT CIR
RAM
A
ST
ROSENAU CIR
JOS HUA TREE CIR
GREEN CLOVER CIR
VALLEY DRROCKRIDGE PL
WESTRIDGE DR
VILLA DRCERRO
VILLA DR
VALLEY DR
HILLCREST AV ECOLONY GROVE LN
HILLCREST CIR
VERDE LOMA S CIR
TAFT AVE
COLONY CIR
AMATE CIR
BIXBY CIR
WILDWOOD WAYPLATANAL DR
BROOK LNPERALTA WAY
NOHL RA NCH RD
PERALTA HILLS DR
PERALTA
W
A
Y
CAVENDISH LN
RURAL RIDGE CIR
ABERDEEN ST
MEATS AVE
CA MDE N S T
WESTON ST
SOMERTON AV E
ROXBURY ST
WOODB INE RD
ASHFORD AVE
CORNWAL L AVE WHITEHALL ST
SPRINGFIELD ST
MEREDITH ST
SURREY ST
LEEDS AVEASHFORD A VE
KENT S T
BENTLE Y ST
ALDERLY LN
FOUNTAIN ARBOR DR
MERIDIA N S T
CROSSGA TE ST
WESTRIDGE CIR
WESTRIDGE RD CA LLE CANADA
TORREY PINES CIR
OAKGROVE CIR
WESTRIDGE RD
CALLEPRINCIPA
PASEO
BANDERA
AVEN
ID
A
FAR
O
RURAL RIDGE DR CALLE D ECASAS
CA RME N CIR
WESTRIDGE CIR
LOOP TRL
NOHL RA NCH RD AVENIDA LA VIDA
INDIAN TRL
INDIAN WE LLS CT
PROSPECTOR CIR
TRAPPER
TRL
PASEO CARMEL SE TTLER CT
SCO
U
T
TR
L
COW BOY CIR
RIV ER VALLEY TRL
FRONTIER CT
CA NNON S T
PATHFINDER TRLSCOUT TRL
BIG SK Y LN
STONEHAVEN DR
VERSAILLE CTSAN
MIGUEL DR
SANMIGUELDR
A
UB
RE
Y
C
IR PORTOFIR
AW AY
M
E
S
A
D
R
VALLEY DR
CA NNON S T
SAN MIGUEL DR
CA RV ER LN
H
ID
D
EN
VALLEY
CIR
CANYONDR
WISTERIA LNESTATES DRHU
NTIN
G
C
IR
LOMA ST
AZALEA
DR
CANYON DR
LAS
FLORES
CIR
GOLDENROD LNVILLA ISLE CIR
VILLA ISLE DR
MESA DR
CANNON ST
KAT
AW
PA
C
IR
CRES TVIE W CIR
SMOKEY AVE
EVERGLA DES CIR
ISLE ROYA LE CIR
RIDGEVIEW
RD
CRESTVIEW CIR
CA NY ON PARK CIR
CARPENTER CIR
BRYCE AVE
CRATERLAKEAVE
M
T.M
cKIN
LEY
BLVD
CRATER LAK E AVEC
AN
N
O
N
ST
LEATRIC
E
D
R
MOUNTAIN AVE
MABURY AVETAFT AVE LARSON CIR
MABURY AVE
HILLS IDE AVE
MODOC ST
LAKESIDE A VE
JUANENO A VE
BROOK SIDE AVE
LEXINGTON AV E
YUROK ST
CHUMASH S T
MODOC ST
PALA PL
SHOSHONE AVE
C
ANN
O
N
ST
FRANK LN
GRAY LN
SARATOGA ST
SAN JUAN DR
WOODV IEW CIR
RICHARD ST
HILTON LN
M
ORADA
D
R
PALO LOMA PL
LINDA V ISTA ST
AVILA PL
CA NNON S T
LOS ALTOS PL
MEADS AVE
RA NCHO S ANTIA GO B LVD
MEADS AVE
COSTELLO P L
CLIFFWAY D R
CLIFFWAY DR
RICHARD ST
CREE KSIDE AV E
AVENIDA
PALMAR CANNONST
RE NE E ST
RY ALS LN
CE NTER ST
CADBURYDR
BOND AVE
BIRDCAGE CT
DESERT
PE
AC
H
CT
BOTTLE BRUSH DR
PAINTB RUS H DR
CHAP MAN AVE
RIDGEVIEW DR
JOA N D ARC CIR
NORMANDIE CIR
WEST VIEW DR
MOUNTAIN V IEW CTEAGLE S POINT
AMAPOLA AVE
LAKEVIEW T RL
CRE
EKV
IEW
DR
LEMON H ILL TRL
H O RSES HOERD
TUR
NABO
UT
RD
SADDLEBACK DR
CAMBRIAC IR
CHAP MAN AVE
W RANGLER CIR
CALLE
G
RAN
D
E
LACUMBREDR
C
ALLE
A
LTA
DE EP SPRING RD
LA CUMB RE DR
DIA
NE
DR
WINDE S DR
HUNTERS WAY
SANDBERG LN
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
LOLITA STKENNYMEAD ST
WILDERNE SS AV E MUS TANG AVEFRANK ST
RA NDALL S T STA LLION ST
ORANGE P ARK BLVD
MEADS AVE
SUFFOLK CIR
ARABIAN AV E
KEN N YMEAD
ST
ACRE PL
COYOTE LN
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
RIDGELIN
E
R
D
AMAPOL A AVE
AM APOLA AVE
SERRANO AV E
SERRANO AV E
LAKE MEA D CIR
HIDDENOAKS
LN
WI
NDESD
R
LEWIS DR
KIMBARK LN
WINDE S DR
NOHL RA NCH RD
BRIGHTON LN HILLS IDE LN
RIDGEWOOD CT CA NY ON RIM RD
GOLDEN SK Y LN ANAHEIM HILLS RD
MORNINGVIEW
DR
COVERED WA GON TRL CA NY ON CT
SUMMIT CT
SILVERSPUR TRL
NUGGET CT
NOHL RA NCH RDOVERLAND CIR
MONTE FINO LN
IRONHORSE LN
LANDE RA LN
STA GE COA CH RD
LANGTRE E LN
BUTTERFIELD
LN
PALOMINO LN HA CK AMORE LN TOURMALINE CT QUARTZ LN
STIL LWATER LN
QUEENS DR CA MINO GRANDE
RUBY LN
GARNET CIR
AMETHY ST LN
LO
N
ESTAR
LN
OAKV IEW LNSAPPHIRE LN
ONYX LN SADDLEBACK LNTWINPE AK CIR
SHANADA CT
JACARANDA WA Y
CO
RAL
CIR
AMBERLNSAPPHIRE LN
LOOK OUT L N
PERIDOT PL
TWIN
PEAK
CIR
WALNUT CANYON
SHADY VALLEY
LN
FAIRWA Y LNSTONEBR IDGE LN
GOLF GLE N DR
RIDGE GLEN RD
FOLK DALE LN
VIA FRE SCO
MICHIGAN CIR
RIDGE VIEW RD
KENTUCKY AVE
SCRIP PS CIR
LOYOLA DR
RUTGERS DRLEHIGH DR
PASEO EL GRE COCA MINO GRANDE
KENTUCKY AVE
SWARTHMORE DR
VASSA R CIR
WILLIAMS CIRPURDUE CIR
PASEO DIEGO
JOHNSTOWN CIRFORDHAM CIR
SWARTHMORE DR
PRINCETON A VE
SERRANO AV EHA RV ARD CIR
EDINB ORO CIR GRINNE LL ST
BUCK NE LL CIR GEORGETOWN CIR
LEAFWOOD DRAMHERST CIR
QUINCY CIR
PINE CANYON CIR
RIMW OOD DR
NOHL RA NCH RD
CA RNEGIE AV E
RIMWOOD DR
ASPEN WO OD CIRSERRANO AV E
TAMA RIS K DR
S
MOKEWOOD
CIR
PEGA SUS ST
MARENGO DR
LEAFWOOD DR
BU RLWOOD
DR
AV
ENIDA
D
E
SANTIAGO
SANTIA GO P REMIER
IRV INE PARK RD
JAMBOREE RD
HEATHER VIEW LN
JAMBOREE RD
FRONTERA ST
SWEETWATER ST
DE ERFIELD S T
BLUEROCK ST
TORRENS S T
BAINBRIDGE A VE
ALDERDA LE AVE
CLA YTOR CIR
HOLTWOOD AVE
ALDERDA LE CIR
RE DROCK ST
ELKSTONE AVE
ADDINGTON DR
SAGA MORE ST
BLUE GUM ST
WHITE S TAR A VE KRAEMER BLV D
LA PALMA AVEWHITE S TAR A VE
ARMANDO ST
LA PALMA AVE
LA PALMA AVE
LA MESA A VE
RE DW OOD DR
RE DW OOD DR
TAORMINA DR
CA ROUSEL PL
ROYAL PL
SYCAMORE STSYCAMORE ST VIA PISA
SYCAMORE ST
PLANTA TION PL
RE DW OOD P L JACKSON AVE
RE DW OOD DR
RE DW OOD DR
CA ROUSEL ST
ROYAL PL
BANGOR W AY
PLANTA TION PL
CA RNIVA L AVE CA RNIVA L AVE
RIO VISTA STOLYMPIA PL NORMANDY PL
CHANTILLY STTOWER PL
UNDERHILL AVELONDON PL
BLANCHA RD A VE MARDI GRAS AV E
STA TE COLLEGE BLVD
TENNYSON AVESEVILLE A VE
NE W AVE
CA ROLYN WAY
WESTPORT DR
WESTPORT CIR
HILDA CIR
WESTPORT DR
PURITAN LN PURITAN DR
PURITAN PL
PURITAN CIR
COLT S T SUNK IST S T
PRISCILLA WAY DUSTIN PLRE SEDA ST CITADEL LNPLYMOUTH PL PEREGRINE S T
MANCOS AV EHILDA CT
VIRGINIA AV EVIRGINIA AV E
VIRGINIA AV E VIRGINIA AV E
ALDEN PLALDEN AVE ALDEN AVEVIRGINIA PL
ALDEN PL
COLT S T
ALDEN PL
RE SEDA PL STA NDISH A VE
JAMBOLAYA ST
MATILDA S T
STA NDISH A VE
STA NDISH A VERE SEDA ST
PEREGRINE S T
SOUTH S T
SOUTH S T
DIA NA DR
DIA NA AVE
DIA NA AVE
PRISCILLA STPLYMOUTH PL
VALE AV E
BETHE L DR VERDE AVE
STE HLE Y ST
VERDE AVEOAKS TONE WAY
VIKING AV E
VIKING AV E
PHYLLIS CIR
JAMES ON ST
NORSE CIR
RA NDY A VE
RIO VISTA ST
NA PA PL HILDA S TNORDICA LN
CHANTILLY STHILDA P L
OLMSTEAD WA YSTA TE COLLEGE BLVD HILDA P L
BURNTWOOD AVE
NURA PL
GLAMUS AV ESUNK IST S T
NURA AV E
DUNE ST
RE SEDA ST AMES CIR
AMES AV ESTONE CIR
NY ON PL NY ON AVE
MARJAN ST
VERMONT AVE
CA RDIFF S T
VERMONT AVE VERMONT AVE
VERMONT AVE
SUGARWOOD LN
OSHKOSH AVENORDICA S T
OSHKOSH AVEOSHKOSH CIR OSHKOSH AVE
FIGWOOD LN
HILDA S TCE DA RW OOD LN LIZBE TH CTBLACKWOOD LN SIET PLPEARWOOD LNFIRWOOD LN
LIZBE TH AV E LIZBE TH AV ELIZBE TH AV E LIZBE TH AV E
AMBRIDGE S TSADDLEWOOD LNMINTWOOD LN CHAUCER ST PEREGRINE P L
WAGNER AV E
WAGNER AV E
MAVERICK AV E
SIET PL
LAURE LWOOD LN
MAVERICK AV EAMBRIDGE S T CLA RE NCE ST
NORM PLTRYON A VE
CORTNEY W AY
NORMAN PL
NORM PL
STRONG PL
MAUERHA N PL STRONG PLSTA TE COLLEGE BLVD
SUNK IST S T
ALMONT AVE
BALL RD
LEWIS ST
KATELLA AV E
ROYAL OAK RD
SPRING RD CONSTA NTINE RD
AVENIDA FELIPE
BEAUTY DR
VISTA DEL RIOLAKEVIEW
AVE
HA DRIANS CRESAVENIDA FELIPEORANGE HILL LN
PASEO BALB OASPR ING HILLDR
AVENIDA BERNARDO
MARGARITA AVE
SHADY GLE N LN
VISTA DEL AMIGO FRANCISCO P LCRES CE NT DR
CA LLE DIAZ
FIRENZE CRESMARGARITA AVE
PASEO DE LEONGLEN ARBOR LN HE RME S RD
CHRISALTA W AY LEANDRO ST
SOLOMON DR
CA LLE GAM ASILVERBROOK DR LAPAZ ST
TIBE R DR
FERN HAVE N LN PASEO DE SOTO
VISTA DEL DIASMOKE RIDGE TER
CE RRO VISTA DR AVENIDA BE RNARDO HILLCREST ST
MARSHA CIR
VISTA
DEL CANON
HILLCREST CIR ANAHEIM HILLS RD
CA MINO PIZON
ARMSTRONG CIR
BOONE CIR
COLUMBUS WAY
PARK RIM CIR
VIA
D
E
R
O
SA
CREE KSIDE LN
RUTGERS CIR
SERRANO AV E
PARK LN
VIRGINIA AV E
KEEGAN WAY
GROVE MONT ST KNOLL L AKE
GROVE MONT ST
GROVE MONT ST
FORE ST LA KEVIEW LAK ELINCOLN A VE
TOWNLEY ST
EASTWOOD AVE SHADOW LA KEHA THAWA Y ST PARK LN
MARTY LN CHERRY ST
ASPEN STTRASK AVE LYON ST
BUFFALO A VE AVALON A VELYON STAVALON A VE
SPURGEON ST
AVALON A VE MANTLE S T RICHMOND ST
TWE NTY-SECOND STEDNA DR
TWE NTY-SECOND STPORTOLA A VE CA MINO AVELINW OOD A VE
CA TALINA A VEALONA ST
MILLWOOD STEASTWOOD ST
G
LEN
V
IEW
PL
CONCORD S T
EASTSIDE AV E
AVALON A VE
MARDE LL AVE
EARLHAM ST
ORANGEVIEW
LN
RIDGEWOOD ST
WHITTIER ST
BORTZ ST
POLARIS RD
THOR RD
JUMPER RD
SATURN RD
MISSILE LN
ATLA S DR
WAKEFIELD AV E
PAGEANT DR
SUN
FLO
W
ER
CIR
HA
RVEST
LN
SEDONA DR
O
L
D
C
H
APM
AN
AVE
LOMITA AVE
COUNTRY HOLLOW
CORO DE ORO DR
TRAILS E ND LN
CHAP MAN AVE
CHAP MAN AVE
NE WPORT BLVD
WHITE OAK RDG
EQUESTRIAN DR
DA PPLE CIR
CAMBRIA CIR
CA LICO TRL
BISCAYNEWAY
FORT RD
SANTA MARIA ST
W
ILD
HORSECIR
MEADS AVE
ORANGE P ARK BLVD
WILLOW W OOD CIR
NA VARRO PL
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
VALLEY FORGE DR
CA TALINA S T
GLEN ALBY N LN
EQUESTRIAN LN
BOND AVE
CHURCH S T
CHURCH S T
EL SALVA DOR AVE
NOBLE ST
ESPLANADE ST
CONSTITUTION AVE
HE WES ST
VIA LA PALOMA
CA SSELLE AVE
DUNAS RD
LA VETA AVE
OLYMPIA WAY
KENSINGTON RD
WELLINGTON RD
EXETER PL
CRAIG DR
BELVEDERE RD
DUTCH A VE
HE MPSTEAD RD
BARBARA W AY
TREVOR ST
WINFIELD A VE
PLANTA TION PL
ARMANDO ST
VIA TRIE STE
VIA TARANTO
VIA BRUNO
VIA MARSA LA
VIA TRIE STE
VIA MARCO
COTTONWOOD ST
EDGEWA TE R S T
SANDBAR CIR
RIV ER MIST CIR
COTTONWOOD ST
RIVERVIEW AVE
WHITE S HORES DR
PINEWOOD ST
COTTONWOOD ST
MEADOWB ROOK AVE
KRAEMER PL
SANTA ANITA ST
SAN ALTO AV E
SAN ALANO AVE
JEANINE DR
BETH S T
BARBARA W AY
ROBBINS CT
ASHBURY PL
VIA ROMA
VIA REMO
VIA REMO
SPRUCE WOOD AVE
ORANG E S T
GLASS ELL ST
TULAROS A AVE
MORELAND DR
OLD CAMP RD
CROSS CREEK RD
LA VETA AV E
SANTA ANA CANYON RD
CIRCLE HAVEN RD
BELLEZA LN CA LLE DANA
STRADA P L
C
ERR
O
VISTA
W
AY
PERALTA HILLS DR
OAK HILL DR
SPLIT RA IL LN
FORE ST GLEN RD
BRADBURY CT
ORANGE A CRE S DR
NOHL RA NCH RD
GENTRY LN
FAIRFIELD ST
EVENING VIEW RD
ROLLING HILLS PL
TISB URY CT
PRAIRIE PL
NA NTUCKET LN
ANDOVER DR
STA NDISH A VE
HE MPSTEAD RD
BUTLER ST
DUNTON AVE
DUNTON AVE
LINCOLN A VE
ST. JAMES AVE
MAIN ST
GAFF S T
BUOY AV E
GALLEY ST
GAFF S T
NORTHUMBERLAND RD
SANTIAGO BLVD
SOMERSE T S T
SOMERTON AVE
SHELTON AVE
TRINITY LN
MAPLEWOOD ST
FEA THERHILL DR
MOCKINGBIRD PL
WARBLER PL
HA RT ST
RAGAN
C
IR
WILDWOOD CIR
WILDWOOD WAY
OMEGA AVE
OMEGA AVE
SIMPSON CIR
TALT AVE
ALTE NA WAY
HILDA S T
ALKI PL
ALKI ST
WHIDB Y LN
WHIDB Y LN
HA RRIS CT
TRENTON AVE
HIGHLAND S T
LAKES IDE AVE
LITTLE JOHN WAY
HA NDY S T
VANOWE N A VE
FREDRICK DR
OAK LN
WILDERNE SS AV E
ECKHOFF ST
PRIVATE STREET
SINCLA IR S T
HOOVE R A VE
HA RDING S TLAURE L DR
WANDA RD
OAKMONT A VE
JACARANDA AV E
HE LENA CIR
WILSON AV E
MONTA NA CIR
GLORIA CIR
POTTE R CIR
RA DE C CT
MARION WAY
CE RRITOS DR
GLEN ALBY N LN
ALPINE ST
LOMITA AVE
GRAND ST
OAKMONT A VE
MAYFAIR AVE
ROSE AV E
ORANGE S T
GRAND ST
EVERETT P L
HA RW OOD S T
JEFFE RS ON AVE
LYNN DR
CA LIFORNIA ST
BARKLEY A VE
LINCOLN S T
EVERETT P L
ORANGE GROVE AVE
HE RITAGE PL
LINCOLN S T
WALNUT AV E
ORANGE GROVE AVE
SACRAMENTO ST
MADISON AV E
CLINTON ST
APPALOOS A TRL
EUCA LYPTUS TRL
HIGHBROOK RD
HILLS GATE RD
JE T
TY
D
R
HA LYARD LNBEAUXWOOD ST
STA Y CT
SPINNAKER ST
SPINN
A
KE
R
ST
LEWIS STANCHOR S T
SPINNAKER ST
VERU STGRANT P L
TOWN CE NTRE PL
RA MPART S T
FIR ST
POPLA R S T
STE VENS ST
BEVERLY DR
FLOWER ST
POPLAR
ST
BEVERLY DR
FAIRMONT ST
CITRUS ST
MAIN ST
HA RW OOD S T
CA LIFORNIA ST
SHAFFER ST
LAEL DR
MAPLE AV E
CLE VELAND ST
MAPLEWOOD PL
MONTE RE Y RD
CE NTURY DR
LINCOLN S T
MT. VE RNON AVE
MARTHA AV E
DA NA AVE
WAYFIELD CIR
SYCAMORE AVE
WAYFIEL D ST
MT. VERNON AVE
MARTHA AV E
LE MAY CT
PARK LN
SYCAMORE AVE
SPRING ST
KATHLE EN LN
MAPLE AV E
CE NTER ST
KILLINGSW ORTH AV E
PROSPE CT ST
SHASTA ST
HE WES ST
EARLHAM ST
DUNAS S T
MAPLE AV E
THOMA S ST
RA NCHO S ANTIA GO B LVD
AVENIDA PA LMAR
CHRISTINE ST
SYCAMORE AVE
THORA S T
WHEATGRASS DR
CO
BBLESTO
N
E
DR
MORNINGLORY W AY
ELK GLE N L N
GLEN OA K LN
BAYPORT S T
ADRIAN ST
LAMPSON A VE
LAUX CIR
LAUX CIR
HE ATHER CIR
CHAPMAN AVE
PROVIDENCE AV E
BUSH ST
McCOY RD
PAUL RD
PEPPE R S T
CITRUS ST
MARIETTA A VE
CLA RK ST
KELLY AV E
PINE ST
ORANGE S T
GRAND ST
RIV ER AVE
WAVERLY S T
GARDNER ST VAN BIBBE R AVE
WASHINGTON AV E
WASHINGTON AV E
WAYFIELD ST
FAIRWA Y DR
TERI LNJENNIFE R L N
DOROTHY DR
ROSALIND DR
WASHINGTON AV E
WHEELER PL
MALENA DR
KATHLE EN LN
ROBERTA DR
WHEELER ST
CE NTURY AVE
SERANADO S T
SWIDLER PL
DOROTHY DR
PROSPE CT ST
WASHINGTON AV E
NORWOOD S T
ALMOND AVE
LO
NG
SPUR
LN
RAVEN
CT
OUTRID
ER
ST
CA NY ON VIEW AVE
PRESIDIO W AY
M
U
LBERRY
ST
TIMBERLANDAVE
SANTA CRUZ AVE
RA IN TREE RD
AS
PEN
ST
SALINAS CT
INDIAN HILLS RD
IRONWOOD AVE
ANNE TTE CIR AUDREY CIR
ARLETTA CIR
JETTY ST
ADRIA N CIR
DUNKLEE AVE
ASPENWOOD AV E
AUDREY CIR
BLUE SPRUCE AVE
ANNE TTE CIR
PARK VINE S T
FONDREN ST
EL PRADO A VE
PARK HYDE ST
LEWIS ST
FOUNDREN ST
LARAMORE LN
LORI LN
McEVOY LN
RIV ER LN
SHARON RD
EL RANCHO AVE
FERNWOOD DR
WESTWOOD AVE
FARMERS DR
MAINPLACE DR
FAIRMONT ST
JONQUIL RD
CLE MENSEN AVE
JESS EE DR PARK LNPARK LN
PARK LN
EASTWOOD AVE
KEEGAN WAY
OLD GRAND ST
JOA NA DR
LINW OOD S T
LINW OOD S T
EASTSIDE ST
WRIGHT S T
CONCORD S T
LYON ST
FORE ST LA KE
FAIRWA Y DR
WAVERLY S T
ROSWELL S T
RICHMOND ST RIDGEWOOD ST
KEMPER AV E
DA YNA ST
YOUNG CIR
LA VETA AV E
TULAROS A AVE
ROSEWOOD AV E
ALBION LN
NUBIA N LN
GREENGROVE ST
WAYFIELD ST
KIRKWOOD AVE
PONDEROS A ST
CA LVO DR
PONDEROS A ST
JOA NA DR
LOWRY ST
FAIRMONT WA Y
BURDIE LN
LORETTA DR
WHEELER PL
MALENA DR
ELGIN PL
ARLINGTON RD
HA RTFORD RDCOATE RD
FLINT DR
FIELDSTONE DR
STE ARNS DR
STE ARNS DR
DA RME L PL
KIRKWOOD AVE
OLYMPIA WAY
SHASTA WAY SHASTA WAYDIX ON AVE
AUSTIN AV E AUSTIN AV E
TILDEN AVE
CA SSELLE AVE
SWIDLER PL
SWIDLER PL
CE DA RW OOD S T
STE ARNS DR
WINTHROPE ST
KIRKWOOD AVE
HA VENWOOD CIR
KIRKWOOD AVE
FERNWOOD AVE
LARKSTONE AV E
NE WHAVEN DR
SCHUG ST
FERNWOOD AVE
SHAD
YFORESTLN
WATERFORD S T
RIV ERDA LE AVE
VALLEY FORGE RD
MERRIMA C DR
FLINTLOCK WA Y
FINCH ST
ADDINGTON CIR
MAL CT
SANTA ANA CANYON RD
ROGUE DR
COUNTRY CANYON RD
R
U
STIC
G
ATE
W
AY
WYNGATE RD
CE DA RHAV EN WAY
LAMP POST WAY
RIDGE GATE RD
CHALICE LNFAIRFIELD ST
MEATS AVE
RE GENCY AV E
FAIRLEE CT
GATEWOOD LN
HONEYWOOD LN
ROCKRIDGE PL
WESTWAY A VE
DUNTON AVE
DUNBAR ST
DE LTA S T
WHITECAP AVE
VALLEY GLEN LN
WICKHAM AVE
ROCHE STE R DR
TENDERROW PL CHEV INGTON CT
HUNSFORD DR
AUBURN ST
VIA ESCOLA
HILLS BOROUGH AVE
AMERICAN WAY S T
WOODS TOCK AVE
BROOK SIDE AVE
HA RT ST
HILLS IDE AVE
ARDE N V ILLA DR
HUMMINGB IRD CIR
BRILEY WA Y
MARIPOSA DR
MENDOCINO CIR
FLINTRIDGE DR
CA RME L DR
VILLA LN
BALLIET DR
WATERTON AVE
DRES SAGE ST
CLY DE SDALE AV E
WHITE A LDE R CIR
HE IM AVE
PRADO WOODS DR
WESTWOOD DR
STRATFORD CIR
STE RLING AVE
CA MDE N CIR
VIA BR AVO
JOCOTAL A VE
DOUGLASS RD
BRENNA LN
HOOVE R A VE
COOLIDGE AVE
GARFIELD AVE
SACRAMENTO ST
JODI ST
MILFORD ST
QUINCY AVE
MONROE AV E
JACKSON AVE
MALLARD ST
MORGAN ST
PORTSMOUTH CIR
WELLINGTON CIR
FREDRICK DR
ALBANY CIR
MORROW CIR
CE DA RHILL CIR
SHERWOOD CIR
HUNTINGTON CIR
VIA BRAVO
SQUIRESC
IR
PHELAN DR
OLD LAMPLIGHTER LN
CORAL TRE E CIR
EDGEWOOD AV E
PARK VILLA PL
PARK VILLA LN
DURFEE LN
PARK VILLA CIR
SEQUOIA AVE
BRADEN CT
CRES CE NT DR
LOMITA AVE
BARKLEY A VE
BIRCHWOOD RD
RA NCHROAD DR
AD
RIAN
ST
WINDGAP DR
ARBOR WAY
YORKSHIRE P L
HA THAWA Y DRCA NFIELD PL
COPPERFIELD RD
MINE CA NY ON RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
BALBOA AVE
NE WPORT AVE
DEERSHIRE CT
LOREDO AV E
FINCH ST
CHANTILLY ST
CINDA ST
JEANINE ST
WESTGATE DR
PURITAN PL
STE HLE Y ST
LINCOLN A VE
LINCOLN A VE JEANINE CIR
ALICE WAY
COLLYER LN
BELLAMY A VE
HE MPSTEAD RD
KEOK UK ST
YORKTOW
NCIR
BUNK ER HIL L
NA UTICAL ST
ACACIA AVE
HIGHLAND S T
HE ATHER CIR
DUNKLEE AVE
GRAND AVE
GROVE MONT ST
LONDONDERRY LN
CHIDDINGSTONE LN
LOCHLEVEN LN
GATESFORD LN
GLASTONBURY LN
WEDGEW OOD LN
PENZA NCE LN
ROSED ALE LN
COTS WOLDS LN
CA RNEGIE LN
CHARDONNAY LN
VIRAGE S T
LIV EOAK DR
BRIARCREST LN
CED AR CREEK WAY
APPLETREE LN
KNOLLWOOD DR
FIELDCREST LN
AUTUMNHILL WAY
OAK TREE LN
SWEETWATER LN
BRIARWOOD RD
ELDERWOOD AVE
WHITEOAK
RDG
JONQUIL RD
PARK LN
RIV ERSIDE RD
RIV ERSIDE DR
NORTH
PARK
BLVD
H
ELIO
TR
O
P
E
D
R
BENTO
N
W
Y
BUFFALO A V
SANTA CL ARA AV SANTA CL ARA AV
BUFFALO S T
O
LIVE
LN
LO
W
E
LL
LN
TOWNER
ST
TO
W
N
ER
ST
FR
EE
M
AN
ST
O
LOV
E
ST
W
E
STW
O
OD
A
V
RO
SEW
O
O
D
AV
BAKER ST
22ND ST
MARION WY
LOUIS ST
W
ESTW
O
O
D
AV
R
OSEW
O
O
D
AV
RIVIERA DR
RIVER LN
BAKER ST
SHARON RD
LOWELL LNTOWNER LN
GREENBRIER
HE SPERIAN ST
SHARON
RIV ER LN
ALONA S T
FO
R
EST
AV PARK LN
PARK LN
ELM ST
HE SPRIAN ST
PACIFIC AVSPRUCE STFORE ST A V
RIV IERA DR
MARION WY
ALONA ST
SANTA CLA RA AV
POPLA R S T HE SPERIAN ST
EML ST
POPLA R S TPACIFIC AVSPRUCE STFORE ST A VTAMY LN
TWE NTY-SECOND ST
CA NDIS A VEJODY A VE
BONNIE BRAE
HELIOTROPE DR
ACACIA PL
SUNDERLAND ST
TIMBE
RLINE
ST
M
AR
Y
S
CIR
LN
TIMBERLIN
LN
W
ILLO
W
GLE
N
CIR
R
AVEN
S
CRO
FT
RD
N
O
R
FO
LD
D
R
CHANTIL L Y CIR
CASTL EROC K LN
SUNRISE LN
S
AIN
T
C
L
O
U
D
LN
FOXRUN
RD
KINGS BRIDGE RD
COWAN
HEIGH
TS
HIG
H
CLIFF
DR
BRIER LN
COWAN CANYON CIR
RANGEVIEW
LAKECRESTCIR
O
VE
RHILLDR
DEER
H
AVEN
D
R
COWAN HEIGHTS HIGHCLIFF DR
RANGEVIEW DR
DEERHILL DR
BRIGHTW OOD DR
CLEARVIEW L N
QUAIL
RUN
SIR
RINE
D
R
LA SIERRAPL
LAD ERA
SENDA
O
VE
RV
IEW
C
IR
LONGMONT PL
SHADYRIDGEDR
BRIER LN
TRAVETINE
PL
BOCA
CAN
YO
N
D
R
O
VER
H
ILLD
R O
VERHILL
D
R
MIRA
VISTA
DR
G
R
O
VEOAKDR
COTTONTAIL DR
M
ARTIN
G
ALEPL
BRIGHTON
DR
W
EYM
O
U
N
T
PL
QUADRILLE
PL
HUNTSMAN
FURLONG
DR
BRIDLE PATHW
Y
PADDOCK LN
BRO
NC
O
C
IR
LEM
ONHEIGHTSDR
CHERRYHILL DR
MUMFORD
DR
EDGEVIEW
DR
GLENAIRE
DR
LIMETREE
DR
CHERRYHILLDR
YARM
O
U
TH
RD
CLOYDEN RD
ADDISON
RD
CORON EL RD
THORLEY
DR
APSLEY
RD
PEACOCK HILL DR
BENNINGTON DR
ARROYO A V
CORONEL RD
SKYLIN
E
D
R
KIMBER WICKE DR
ROCKHURST AV
RIDG
EW
AY
DR
BRO
ADVIEW
PL
HILLSBORD
RD
GR EE NBRIER RD
BRADCIFF CT
HYDEPARKDR
NEWPORT BLVD
PI N E CANYONRD
OVERBROOK DR
CORALWOOD DR
HIGHT CREST CIR
HINTON W Y
SSHELLY
LN
HINTON WY
EL ROY DR
WILLIS LN
GREENWAL D LN
M
A
R
TIN
LN
BARRETT LN
SAINTJUDE DR
DORIS WY
FISHER LN
BARRETT LN
FISCHBECK
RD
CA RME L WY
FAIRHAVE N EXT
SAYLOR TER
CRAW
FORD
CANYO
N
RD
CRAWFORD CANYONRD
CANYONTER
PONO
RA
M
A
VIEW
PANO
R
AMA PL
VIE
W
RIDG
E
D
R
ARTNELL E XT
P
AN
O
RAM
A
PL
CIRCULAPANORAM A
BAJA
PONORAMA
VISTA
PANO
RAM
A
CIRC U L A PANORAMA
M
ENUD PANORAMA
MEDIA
PAN
O
RAM
A
BAJA
PO
NO
R
AM
A
LIBER
TY
W
Y
C
HIPW
O
O
D
S
T
LYNNW O OD AV
K
IN
G
VIEW
RD
CHAR
M
AIN
E
LN
ARTNELL E XT
W
IN
N
W
O
OD
LN
FAIRHAVE N AV
FAIRHAVE N
MITTMAN LN
ROCKY RD
BARRETT LN
SAINT MA RY S DR
THOMAS
D
R
AZU
SA
C
IR
TAM
ARIS
K
D
R
DE EP WELL RD
SCOTT
PINOTO LN
STA NTON
LA
R
IAT LN
SAINTM
ARKS
DR BARRETT
HILL CIR
LEMON CIR
LEMON
HILL
GATEWAY
D
R
FOOTHILL BLVD
NE WHAVEN
CA BARET CT
EARLHAM
LASSEN DR
SANDH
URST
PL
MALTA ST
VALE AV
SPAULDING AV
SILVER ST
OAK RIDGE DR
HILLHAVEN DR
SANDHURST PL
SILVER ST
MAPLE WY
GIMBERT LN
OAK RIDGE DR
ETON PL
HILLHAV EN DR
SUSSEX P L
EMB UR Y DR
WHITNEY DR
RA INIE R DR
CRANBR OOK DR
OAK RIDGE DR
KOOTENAY DR
KOOTENAY DR
BOW P L
SUSSEX P L
DODGE AV
SANTA CLARA AV
ESPLANADE AV
ESPLANADE AV
ALLEGHENY DR
OAK RIDGE
SANTA C LARA AV
MT HOOD DR
BLU
D
R
ID
GE
D
R
RA INE R DR
OLYMPIA WAY PALOMA R W AY
DA RME L PL
MT HOOD DR
PROSPE CT AV
RA INE R DR
MALENA DR
W HITNEY
FLINT
DR
LAURINDA W Y
MALENA DRWHELLER PL
LORETTA DR
ROSALIN DR
FLINT DR
FLINT DR
LAU
R
IND
A
W
Y
LAUR
IN
D
A
W
Y
SANTA CLA RA AV
MEREDITH DR
EDDY DR
SANTA CLA RA AV
BRENT LN
LEAFWOOD LN
WHEELER PL
W
HE
ELER
PL
M
ALEN
A
D
R
MALENA DR
FAIRM
O
N
T
W
Y
FAIRMONT WY
ETHELB EE WA Y
CA LVO DR
KEEGAN WY
GROVE MONT ST
MARSHALL LN ETHELB EE WY
YORBA S T
YORBA S T
RAINER DR
MARSHALL LN CA RROLL WY FAIRMONT WY
LINDA LN
LEAFWOOD LN
BRYCE PL
O
A
K
LN
DODGE AV DODGE AV
SMOKE TREE LN
GIGI DR
SA
INTJOHNPL
SAINTVINCENT PL
FOOTHILL B LVD
FOOTHILL BLVD LA LIMONAR RD
CA MBERA PL
BIM
INIDR
DORSETSHIRD
LN
BRAD
C
LIFF
ARROYO
AV
SANTA CLA RA AV
LEAFWOOD LN
ALLEGHENY DR
ALLEGHENY DRALLEGHENY DR
MIRA LAGO PLN
COW
AN
HEIGHTS
DR
O
VERHILLDR
WHITESTONETER
HOLLY TREE LN
FOX SPRIN GS R D
LEMON
LEAF
O
RANGE
KNOLLDR
CONVENTRY PL
BRUNSW ICK WY
PEMBROKEDR
PAINTE D P ONY LN
MARCY DR
M
ARCY
RANCH
RD
HOLIDAY L N
VILLA
R
O
SE
DR
S
PR
ING
W
O
O
D
DR
M
IRIAM
PLN
PANOR AMA
REST
B
O
NITAHEIG
H
TS
DR
C
O
TTO
N
W
O
OD
DR
IRONWOOD LN
OLD FOOTHILL BLVD
KASSY DR
GREEN WILLOW CT
SHEPARD
W
Y NE WPORT AV
SANDHURST
SUSSEX P L
ESPLANADE PARK
FAIRWOOD LN
ALLGHENY DR
LASSEN DR
ALLEGHENY DR
GERSHON P L
BLUE RIDGE
C
R
ESTLINE
D
R
SHASTA WY
LASSEN DR
LASSEN WY
PROSPE CT AV
LASSEN DR
ETON PL
LAKE HIL L DR
TWINTREE CIR
SHERING HAM AVE
SHAFFER ST
CLE VELAND ST
WILSON AV
STRUCK AV
OAKM ONT AVE
W
AVE
R
LY
ST
LEMON ST
TAFT AVE
HIGHPOINT RD
G
YM
KA
N
A
ST
GROVEWOOD LN
SYCAMORE GLEN DR
KIRKWO OD AV
FERNWOOD AVE
MORGAN ST MALLARD STADELE ST KATHLE EN ST
MALLARD STMORGAN ST
JACARANDA AV E
LOCUST A VE
JUNIPER AVE
PALO A LTO PL
MUIR DR
MUIR DR
O'DONNELL WA Y
SHAFFER STSHAFFER ST
CA SE STCA SE ST
MAIN ST
KATELLA AV E
BATAVIA ST
ORANGE S T
QUINCY AVE
GLASS ELL ST
LEMON ST
KATELLA AV E
ADAMS AVE
LINDA V ISTA ST
CA TALINA S T
NA VARRO PL
PORTSMOUTH CIR
VALENCIA DRNA VARRO PL
PALO LOMA PL
VALENCIA DR
WILLIAMSB URG ST
ZION
ST
CAR
LSBA
D
ST
LASSEN BL VD
SHENANDOAH AVE
TETON AVE
CROWN PARKWA Y
FAIRECLIFF DR
SKYLINE DR
P
AR
KHU
RST
DR
FO
XW
ORTH
DR
ANDOVER DR
RIDGEMONT CT
SANDSTONE CT
HILLG ROVE CT
ROCKHURST DR
ROCKHURST DR
RA MA ST
CLIFFWA Y DR
ENTERTAINMENT DR
VISTA POI NT DR
LAS P A LMAS CIR
POPLA R S T
WILKEN WY
PONDEROSA LN
ADRIA N S T
BINNA CLE AV
CITRUS ST
ROBIN RD
VISTA ROYALE DR
W HITE LANTERN LN
RANCHGATE
RD
COPPER KETTLE W AY
FEATHER HILL DR
WIND MILL LN
ROCKY POINT RD
W HITE SPRING LN
CITY BLV D W EST
METROPOLITAN
DR
CITY PK WY WE ST
BLUE BIRD AVE
ENC
ANTO
ST
BIG
SKY
LN
EVERGREEN ST
GARFIELD AVE
COOLIDGE AVE
HOOVE R A VE
ADAMS AVE
QUINCY AVE
JACKSON AVE
MONROE AV E
LOCUST A VE
ELMWOOD STFERN STHA NDY S T
MAYFAIR AVE
MADISON AV E
DELIA LN LO
W
RY
LN
BREEZY
W
AY
DA YNA ST
LIN
W
O
O
D
ST
OLD GRAND ST
LAR
CH
M
O
NT
AV
BEECHWOOD ST
CHERRY ST
JOA NA DR
JOA NA DR
LARCHMONT AV E
FAIRMONT AV E
HA THAWA Y ST
BUFFALO A VE
AVALON A VE
COTTONWOOD ST
FRANZEN AVE
OLD GRAND ST
BEECHWOOD ST
BRYNWOOD ST
FLOWER ST
OLIVE LNFREEMA N L N
WESTWOOD AV
BAKER ST
LOUISE ST
G
R
EENB
R
IER
ST
MEMORY LN
RD
PACIFIC AV
SPINNAKER ST
HILTON ST
AN
G
EL
VIEW
TER
MUIR
D
R
PO
TOM
AC ST
JAM
ES
TO
W
N
W
Y
SYCAMORECIR SYC AMORE CIR
LUDWIG ST
BREWER W Y
CANYON CREST
DR
SHALLOW BR O OKL N
BR
Y
N
M
A
R
DR
PEPP ERTREE DR
CERRO VILLA DR
SANTA
ANA
CA
N
YO
N
R
D
RO
XAN
NE
ST
TOBY LN
STA RLIGHT DR
VALLEY V IEW PLCE RRO VISTA DR
SLEEPY
LN
COPA
DEORODR
WESTFORD ST
SHANNON ST
ARDMO
RE
ST
W
E
STFO
RD
ST
ABERDEENST
LO
N
DERRYLN
FAIRFIELD ST
GR EEN SBORO
LN
GREENS
BOROLN
W
EY
MOUTH CT
SANTIAGO
W
Y
WILVERDO
WY
TU
M
B
LEW
EED
RD
WILLOWICK DR
BIG
SKY
LN
RURAL RIDGE
C
IR
PEPPER CREEK WYORANGE CREEK LN
O
AK
W
Y
R
O
D
E
O
C
IR
BROADMOOR
TWINLEAF TR
APPAL OOSA TR
BROADMOOR TRAIL
HO RS ESHOE
TR
CHANDLER
RANCH
RD
SADDLEHORN
W
Y
WOODWIND
A V
E
BAYBERRYST
H
ICK
OR
Y
BR
AN
C
H
RD
SKYLARK PL
STRAW BERRY RDG
CROSSCREEK
W
ILLO
W
ICK
DR
WI LLOWICK CIR
LOS COYOTES DR
STETSON C T
SPYGLASS WY
ARLETTA CIR
CHAP MAN AVE
GAINSBOROUGH RD
ROMELLE A VE
RUTH PL
FERN WOOD AV
CASSELLE AV
N
U
TW
OO
D
ST
WRIGHTW OOD S T
MARMONAV
EL
M
O
D
E
NA
ROCKINGHORSEWY
INVERNESS
PL
HILLSDALEDR
JAM
B
OR
EE
R
D
KIN
G
S
CR
O
W
N
R
D
BEEC
HW
OOD
ST
CLEVELAND
ST
RIVER TRAIL
CINDA ST
SM
O
KETR
EE
LN
PROSP
EC
T
ST
THECITY WAY
BRIGANTINE LN
MARINE DR
CATAMARAN L N
UNIVE RS ITY DR
SKYLARK P L
BONITA CT
SAN MARCOS CT
SANTA ISABE L CT
BOSCANA CT
APACHECREEKRD
SIERRA VISTA DR
SIERR
A
VISTA
D
R
PRESCOTT CT
LAGUNA CT
MAGDALENA DR
PALERMO CT
SAN
RAFAEL CT
H
OLLYO
AK
RDG
ABBEYW
OOD
RD
SPRINGWINDS LN
GO
LDENROD
LN
EDGEMONT DR
CEDARBROOKSRD
G
R
AN
DV
IE
W
RD
TIM
BERG
R
OVE
RD
G
LENBROOK LN
LARKSTONE DR
LARKSTONE DR
LARKSTONE DR
LA RKSTONEDR
MARKWOOD ST
JONS W AY
JONS W AY
RA INB OW FALLS W AY
SUNS ET S T
SUNS ET S T
SAN CARLOS A VE
OCEANVIEW ST
OCEANVIEW ST
RA MONA ST
RA MONA ST
GAYLE ST SANTA ANITA ST
SANTA BARBARA P L
VALLEY V IEW STBIXBY A VE
SAND PEBB LE WAY
RIV ERBOAT WA Y
HA RTMAN ST
ALDERWOOD AVE
COVENTRY ST
RIDGEWAY RD
CHURCH HAVEN WAY
BLACK OA K RD
NOHL RANCH RD
SHADYGLEN LN
BEECHWOOD ST
LINCOLN A VE
CRYS TAL V IEW AV E
BROOK SHIRE AVE
FLETCHER AVE
ROBINHOOD P L
MARYWOOD LN
EC H O HILL WAY
S
HA
DO
W
R
IDG
E
LN
CERRO VILLA DR
LIME ST
BRIARDA LE AVE BRIARDA LE AVE
GLASS ELL ST
O'DONNELL WA Y
G
LAS
SELL
ST
MARQUART ST
MAPLEWOOD STMAPLEWOOD ST
MOCKINGBIRD PL
THREE ARCHES CIR
HA NINGER WAY
LEMON ST VERDE LOMA S DR
BRILEY WA Y
LUDWIG ST
LEMON ST
BRILEY WA Y LUDWIG ST
VERDE LOMA S DR
KNUTH CIRKNUTH CIR
WORKMAN CIR
O
LD
R
AN
C
H
C
IR
KLAMATH PL
PARKER CIR
ATHENS A VE
TRENTON AVE
VANOWE N A VE
ABBOT T CIR
SHARON LN
SARITA PL
CA BRILLO ST
MAPLEWOOD ST
MAPLEWOOD ST
JACARANDA AV E
LOCUST A VE
ELIZA BETH PLELIZA BETH PL
LOMITA AVE
OAKMONT A VE
MAYFAIR AVE
ADOBE W AY
HE WES ST
HE WES ST
MONTE CITO PL
BINNA CLE AVE
WILKEN WA Y
CLIFFWOOD CIR
WILKEN WA Y
STA TE COLLEGE BLVD
TOWN CE NTRE PL
DONNE YBROOKE ST
BEVERLY DR
CA LIFORNIA ST
OAK S TOAK S T
HE WES ST
ROUNDUP W AY
W
ILLOW
SPRING
S
R
D
STE WART DR STE WART DR
FAS HION PARK ST
CY PRESS S T
FAIRWA Y DR
CY PRESS S T
GARDNER ST
PALMYRA A VE
ALMOND AVE
WAYFIELD ST
MALENA DR
LAURINDA LN
COATE RD
WHEELER PL
AGUA WA Y
EARLHAM ST
STOLLER LN
HE WES ST
HE WES ST
CLOVER CT
KNIGHTS BRIDGE RD AMBERWOOD ST
BRENTWOOD DR
WOODW IND A VE
FIRENZA WAY
POPLA R S TPAC
IFIC
A
V
TOWN & COUNTRY RD
LAWSON W AY
VIRGINIA AV EVIRGINIA AV E
LAWSON W AY
JACARANDA AV E
JACARANDA AV E
ANNA POLIS ST GREENGROVE STRIGHTER CIR
YORBA S T
ROSALIND DR ROSALIND DR
LORETTA DR
WHEELER PL
MALENA DR
LAURINDA LNLAURINDA LN
LAURINDA LN
PROSPE CT ST
RE D ROBIN ST
RIV ERVIEW A VE
RIV ERDA LE AVE
MEADOWB ROOK AVE
ASHWOOD ST
SAN ALTO AV E
SAN BRUNO AVE
RIV ERVIEW A VE
KODIAK S T
SANTA LUCIA ST
SANTA CE CILIA ST
TUSTIN ST
MERRIMA C DR
KENNEBEC DR
RIV ERDA LE AVE
DRIFTW OOD S T
RIV ERVIEW A VE
RIP PLING CREEK DR
SANDBAR CIR
MEADOWB ROOK AVE
GLASS ELL ST
RA INIE R A VE
RA INIE R A VE
ASHWOOD ST
HE ARTHSIDE S T
RA INIE R A VE
MEADOWB ROOK ST
BALDWIN AVE
SKYWOOD ST
OLIVE A VE
ORANGE OLIVE RD
BIXBY A VE
SHERI ST
SUNV IEW DR
BALDWIN AVE
BOLINGRIDGE DR
HILLTOP DR
SAN ALANO AVE
GAYLE ST
BALDWIN AVE
HILLV IEW DR
SANTA ANA CANYON RD
RA NCHVIEW DR
TUSTIN
ST
BATAVIA ST
KENNEDY ST
KENNEDY ST
DUNTON AVE
DE LL ST
BERKELEY ST
DE LL ST
GLENSIDE S T
FERNSIDE S T
VISTA RIDGE DR
VISTA KNOLL RD
VISTA KNOLL RD VISTA BLUFF RD VISTA HEIGHTS RDVISTA VALLE Y RD
VISTA CRE ST RD
VISTA BLUFF RD VISTA HEIGHTS RDVISTA VALLE Y RDVISTA CRE ST RD
GREEN RIVER DR
SHADY FOREST LN
TIOGA PA SS RD
BATAVIA ST
OREGON TRAIL LN
FEA THER RIVER WA Y
MERCE D TRAIL RD
GRAND RA PID RD
BADGER PA SS LN
SIERRA NEVADA W AY
GRAND RA PID RD
RIV ER TRAIL RD
RIV ER TRAIL RD
MILLSTREA M LN
WHITE WATER WAY
RIV ER TRAIL RD
RIV ER TRAIL RD
PAMPAS ST
SYLVAN CIR
BROOK SHIRE AVE
CRYS TAL V IEW AV E
CRYS TAL V IEW AV E
BROOK SHIRE AVE
BRENTWOOD AV E
CA PRI ST
AMERICAN WAY S T
WESTWAY A VECRES TWOOD ST
BERKELEY CIR GLENSIDE CIR
HA RTMAN ST
BRENTWOOD AV E
GLASS ELL ST COTTONWOOD ST
BRENTWOOD AV E
BROOK SHIRE AVE
HE ARTHSIDE S T
HARTM
AN
ST
COTTONWOOD ST
FERNSIDE CIR
ASHWOOD ST
DUNBAR ST
EAST VILLAGE WAY
TUSTIN ST
SACRAMENTO ST
MILFORD ST
ROBINHOOD P L DE NIS E AVE
ALTURA AV E
BAILEY DR
M
APLE
G
R
O
VE
R
D
ENTERPRIS E ST
GLASS ELL ST
ORANGE OLIVE RD
GENESS EE ST
MEATS AVE
BURTON AV E
CHOUTEAU S T
EMERSON A VE
MAPLEWOOD STRIDGEWOOD ST
BUCK EYEW OOD AV E
BUCK EYEW OOD AV E
GROVE AVE
MEATS AVE
BRENTFORD AVE
SACRAMENTO ST
TOPAZ ST
SERRANO AV E
WINN CIR
MARK CIR
PAMELA P L
WINN CIR
GOLDENROD LN
LASSEN BL VD
YELLO
W
STO
NE
BLV
D
M
AM
M
O
TH
CIR
GLAC
IE
R
ST
TETON AV E
SERRANO AV E
BATAVIA ST
AVENIDA PALMAR
G
LASSE
LL
ST
WIDDOWS W AY
WIDDOWS W AY
TAFT AVE
CONCORD A VE
PALMDALE A VE
CA MBRIDGE ST
BR IARDALE AVE
GLENDALE A VE
TAFT AVE
TUSTIN ST
ONYX AV E
WARBLER PL
ORIOLE P L
MEADOWLA RK PL
ORANGE B LOSS OM CIR
SUNK IST CIR
CHES TNUT A VE
TRENTON AVE
TUSTIN ST
CA MBRIDGE ST
CONCORD A VE
CHES TNUT A VE
TRENTON AVE TRENTON AVE
CHES TNUT A VE
GLASS ELL ST
CA RLE TON AVE
CA LIFORNIA ST
WILSON AV E
GREENGROVE ST QUINCY AVE
HIGHLAND S T
WILSON AV E
RE MBRANDT CIR
WYETH CIR
RE UB ENS CIR
VAN GOGH CIR
COOLIDGE AVE
HOOVE R A VE
HA RT ST
HA NDY S T
SACRAMENTO ST
WILSON AV E
LOCUST A VE
MONROE AV E
TUSTIN ST
COLLINS AVE
MONROE AV EMONROE AV E
COLLINS AVE
BUSINESS CENTER DR
COMMERCE ST
ECKHOFF ST
ORANGEW OOD A VE
POPLA R S T
ROSE AV E
ORANGE GROVE AVE
CA RRIE A VE
MARKWOOD ST
EVERETT A VE
FERN ST
HA NDY S T
HA RT ST
MALENA ST
CLINTON ST
EVERETT P L
ROSE AV E
HA MILTON A VE
ORANGE GROVE AVE
MADISON AV E
MILFORD RD
CLINTON ST
SACRAMENTO STPALM AVE
TUSTIN ST
PARK LN
DA NA PL
WAVERLY S T
MAPLEWOOD ST
GLASS ELL ST
OLIVE S T
WALNUT AV E
CY PRESS S T
LEMON ST
OLIVE S T
GLASS ELL ST
LEMON ST
CY PRESS S T
PALM AVE
FRAMPTON S T
MAIN ST
SYCAMORE AVE
SPRUCE AVE
POPLA R S T
CE DA R S T
SYCAMORE AVE
ECKHOFF ST
HOLLY ST
STE VENS STFLOWER ST
BITTERBUSH ST
SYCAMORE AVE
BEATON WA Y
WOODRIDGE CIR
MANCHES TE R A VE
CITY BLV D W EST
POINSETTIA DR
MAIN ST
LITTLE MAIN ST
ALMOND AVE
CHAP MAN AVE
MAPLE AV E
MAPLE AV E
ALMOND AVE
OLIV
E S T
LEMON ST
PARK LN
CHAP MAN AVE CHAP MAN AVE
MILFORD ST
SACRAM
ENTO ST
SHERMAN AVE
BENNETT AV E
MALENA DR
CHAP MAN AVE
PALMYRA A VE
ROBERTA DR
KARAN LN
ROSALIND DR
WHEELER PL
DOROTHY PL
ROBERTA DR
ROSALIND DR
LORETTA DRLORETTA DR
YORBA S TTUSTIN ST
GREENGROVE DR
CA LIFORNIA ST
CHALY NN A VECHALY NN A VE
GARDNER DR
PALMYRA A VE
CA MBRIDGE STCA MBRIDGE ST
VAN BIBBE R AVE
WASHINGTON AV E
PALMYRA A VE
WASHINGTON AV E
VAN BIBBE R AVE
WASHINGTON AV E
CULVE R A VE
ORANGE S T
GRAND ST
OLIVE S T
PALMYRA A VE
SHAFFER ST
LEM ON ST
GLASS ELL ST
ORANGE S T
GRAND ST CE NTER ST
LEMON ST LEMON ST
OLIVE S T
GLASS ELL ST
GRAND ST CE NTER ST
ORANGE S T
SHAFFER ST
WASHINGTON AV E
CULVE R A VE
CLA RK STCLA RK ST
PARKER ST PARKER ST
PIXLEY S T
BATAVIA ST
PALMYRA A VE
PEPPE R S T
LIME ST
LA VETA AV E
LA VETA AV E
CRES T RD BEDFORD RD
DE VON RD
LA VETA AV E
LILAC LN
CA SA LINDA CIR
LA LINDA DR
G
LE
N
VIEW
PL
MAIN ST
FELDNER RD
BEDFORD RDCRES T RDORCHA RD A VE ORCHA RD A VE
POINSETTIA DR
FLOWER ST
PALMYRA A VE
ANITA DR
OUTLE T DR
STY LE ST
THE CITY DR
JUSTICE CENTER WAY
LEWIS ST
PARK GRIFFITH AVE
PARK BALBOA AVE
LEWIS ST
TWINLEA F CIR
SANDALWOOD CIR
EL PRADO A VE
PARK CENTRAL AVE
PARK CENTRAL AVE
PARKBALBOAAVE
BRISTOL ST
CRES T RD
BRONSON S T
MAIN ST
TOWN & COUNTRY RD
PARKER ST
LA VETA AV E
LA VETA PA RK CIR
TULAROS A AVE
FAS HION PARK ST
ROSEWOOD AV E
GLASS ELL ST
TOLUCA A VE
PINE ST
GARDNER ST
FAIRWA Y DR
SUMMERFIE LD W AY
FIRWOOD CT ATW OOD CT AUTUMN RIDGE CT
CINNAMON W AYMARIGOLD LN
NA TURE WA YEVERGREE N LN ROCK CRE EK DR
BREEZY WAY
FAIRMONT WA Y
LOWRY ST
ORANGE CE NTER DR
ANAHEIM WAY
VILLAREAL DR
CHAUNCEY
LN
ABBEY LN
MANDE VILLE PL
MANDE VILLE PL
KINGSGATE DR
ROUNDTREE CT
WISH ING WELLLN
WOODBINE
RD
RIDGEWAY RD
CH APEL HILL RD
CUNNINGH AM CT
GREEN GA RDE N LNMARYWOOD DR
MEADOW GROVE RD
MEATS AVE
MEATS AVE
GLEN
CANYON
RD
NEW GATE W AY
C
O
TTAG
E
H
ILL
DR
MILLBAN
K
DR
RIDGE PARK LN
MEADOW GROVE RD
MEATS AVE
BRYCE AVE
MARTINIQUE CT
MEADOWRIDGE RD
LONGRIDGE DR
ROCKRIDGE CIR
SUMMITRIDGE LN
FEATHERHILLDR
BRYNMAR DR
STONERIDGE ST
SANTIA GO B LVD
WINCHES TE R CIR
WINDS OR DR
ROBIN HOOD CIR
CA STLEFORD DR
LINCOLN S T
FITSCHEN RANCH RD
MALLARD ST
MORGAN ST
LACONIA DR
WANDA RD
VIDA DR
COLLINS AVE
ROBERTO ST
KATHLE EN ST
ADELE ST
KINTYRE DR
SIAVO
HN
D
R
LAMBETH CT
WHITE CHAP EL CT PROSPE CT ST
PROSPE CT ST
SALISBURY CIR
HA MMOND CIR
METCALF CIR
TURNBERRY DR
WALNUT AV E
SYCAMORE AVE
PALM AVE
KIRKWOOD AVE
WOODLA ND S T
LA MIRADA LN WESLEY CIR
HE WES AV
SHERWOOD AVE
GREENWOOD AV
ESPLANADE ST LARKSTONE CIR
WRIGHTW OOD S T WRIGHTW OOD S T
CIRCULO WA Y
BURLY AVE
ALANDA AVE
NUTWOOD ST
DONNA AVE
PALMYRA A VE
JAMES ST
CHAP MAN AVE
ESPLANADE ST
PEARL ST
CE NTER ST
VINE ST
ESPLANADE ST
EARLHAM ST
CE NTURY DR
THOMA S ST
SPRING ST
JAMES ST
SYCAMORE AVE
SERANADO S T
HE WES ST
WALNUT AV E
HE WES ST
JAMES ST
JAMES ST
EL CARMEN AVE
HE WES ST
MONTA NA CIR
FRANCISCO DR
LINCOLN CIR
O
RAN
GE
G
ROVE
CIR
ADAMS RANCH RD
ADAMS CIR WULFF DR
LONGRIDGE DR
PALMYRA P L
WESTRIDGE DR
RIDGEWAY RD
LONGHURST ST
NE W GATE W AY
WATERFORD S T
CO
U
RTLAN
D
S
T
OAKHURST AVE
TOW NSEND AVE
ROSEMERE ST
VIA ESCOLA
FITZGER ALD AVE
WHITEHALL ST
TALB OT ST
ASHBY WA Y
MANDE VILLE PL
WOODB INE RD
BRADFORD A VE
CA MDE N S T
PRESTON ST
DA NB URY S T
BRADFORD AVE
HA STINGS AVE
PICCA DILLY PL
BLACKBURN DR
PADDINGTON CT
SHEFFIELD DR
NA PLES CT
HE NLE Y PL
HA MPTON ST
EL RITO DR
VIA ESCOLA
PLAYANO AVE
SYCAMORE ST
WALKMAN CIR
SANTIA GO B LVD
STA CE Y LEE LN
SANTIA GO B LVD
JULIE AVE
VALENCIA DR
SAN REMO P L
ELSINORE A VE
VILLA PARK RD
HIDDEN TRA IL
BRIDLE PATH
RA NCHO S ANTIA GO B LVD
CHERRYWOOD LN
ORANGE GROVE AVE
HA MLIN S T
KENYON PL
WALNUT AV E
HA MLIN S T
CHRISTINE ST
RICHARD ST
RA NCHO S ANTIA GO B LVD
SILVERLEA F AV E
RE NE E ST
CHAP MAN AVE
SANDPIPER CIR
HA MLIN S T
SOLANA DR
WOODLA WN DR
LO
S
TIM
B
RE
S
ST
LOS MES QUITES ST
PHILO AVE
VIA LARDO A VE
STOLLER LN
MONTGOME RY PL
ESPANITA ST
CRES THAVE N LN
PHILLIPS PL
FOWLER AVE
PARKVIEW TE R
MAYNARD WY
A
LTA
PA
NO
RA
M
A
WESTVIEW
DR
ROCKING
HO
RSEWAY
SINGING
W
O
OD
ST
QUAIL LN ROTH LN
PEARL ST
STILLW
ATER
AVE
BOBW
HITE
W
AY
C
ANN
ON
ST PARTRIDGE LN
CANYON VIEW AVE
TUMBLEW EED DR
PINYON PINE DR
DA NDELION DR
INDIGO CT
CANNON
ST
STILLWATERAVE
JIMSON CT
CHANDLER RANCH RD
PONY CT
CHANDLER RANCH RD
CHAP MAN AVE
BRAMBLES
W
A
Y
BREIGHTON CIR
RANCH
W
OOD T
RL
SADDLEHILL TRL
TANGLEWOOD TRL
SU N DANCECIR
RA NCH WOOD TRL
AMAPOLA AVE
R
ID
G
ELIN
E
RD
RIDGELINE
RD
MEADS AVE
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
SANTIAGO CANYON RD
EQUITATIO
N
W
AY
GROVE WOOD LN
COLONY ST
HUNTERS WAY
HIDDEN OA KS LN
SANDBERG LN
DIA
N
E
DR
SIDEW
IN
DER
DR
HUMMINGB IRD CT
CANN
ON
ST
CA BRILLO ST
YORKTOW
N
CIR
CE RRITOS DR
SERRANO AVE
CRE ST DE VILLE
APPLEW OOD DR
VIA ESCOLA CA NNON S T
G
R
AN
D
VIE
W
R
D
TIM
BER
G
R
O
VE
R
D
SMOKEY AVE
ORANGE P ARK BLVD
WATERTON AVE
YOSE MITE A VE
JOS HUA TREE A VE
BRYCE AVE
SHENANDOAH AVE
FORE ST S T
YELLO
W
STO
N
E
B
LVD
JOS HUA TREE A VE
ORANGE P ARK BLVD
RIV ER BIRCH CIR
PEPPE R W OOD CIR
SWEETSHADE CIR
ORANGE P ARK BLVD
ORANGE P ARK BLVD
CLIFFWAY DR
C
AL
LE
BAJA
ORANGE P ARK BLVD
C
ALLE
G
R
AN
D
E
BU
C
KS
KIN
W
AY
PINNACLE POINTEPHEASANT LN
RA VEN LN
DOVE ST
TERRACE RDG
CA NY ON RDG
D OVE LN
KINGS CROW N RD
ST. GERMAIN CIR
NOTRE DAM E ST
NA NCE CIR
N
O
TRE
DAM
E
ST
ROCKING HORSE WAY
BRETON CIR
ALLISON CIR
MYSTIC
LN
CH
ESTERFIELD
CIR
O
XBRIDG
E
C
IR
SKYLARK P L
LEMON CREEK CIR
W
ILLO
W
SPR
IN
GS
RD N
EW
P
O
R
T
BLVD
NEW
PO
R
T
BLVD
WHITE OAK RIDGE
WILDFLOWER AV
CA NY ON VIEW AVE
WALNUT RIDGE RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
AM APOLA AVE
BU
TTONBUSH
TRL
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
FOX RUN LN
BEAR TRE E LNFAW NW OOD LNBROOK GLEN LN
DE ERFIELD LN
WHITE OAK RIDGE
BOX CANYON RD
ROYAL OAK DR
THISTL E CT
LAZY MEADOW RD
CANDL EBERRY CIR
BRIAR CREE K RD
WOODW IND A VE
W
HITE
O
AK
R
DG
FAIRFIELD LN
SAGE HILLS RD
SAGE HILLS RD
SHADOW PINE S RD
MAHOGA NY ST
FAIRFIELD LN
SAN LUIS DR
TIMBERLAND
AVE
GRISLY CANYON DR
JAMBOREE RD
PETERS CANYON RD
SUGAR LOAF PEA KR
D
COLORADO LN
XTRA W AY
PARK LN
ORAN GETR
EE
LN
MONTGOME RY WAY
PRIVATE DR
ES
TATE
DR
BRIARDA LE AVE
HIG
HTR
EE
LN
CHAP MAN AVE
MOUNTAIN A VE
CR
ES
T
D
E
VILLE
PARAGON WAY
FAIRPOR
T
C
IR
MONACO PK WY
HORIZON DR
HORIZON DR
ALEXANDRIA ST
CHELSEY
W
O
ND
ER
VIEW
D
R
GLEN ALBY N LN
GLEN ROBIN LN
GLEN ALBY N LN
GLEN ARRAN LN
NICHOLS AVE
NICOLAS AV E
NORFOLKAVE
CHADWICKPKWY
SCARBOROUGH CT
SKY GATE LN
AVALON A VE
ALTA VIEW DRPROMONTORY W AY
CHATHAM TER
KENDRA
DR
CHES HIRE RD
HA MPSHIRE RD
HIGHWOOD RD
PORTICO TE R
SKYTOP CT
FALCONER WAY
HAW KSFIELD WAY
EATONCT
P
OR
TICO
TER
EATON CT
SERR ANOAVE
DREW WAY
MULB ERRY LN
BUCK THORN LNBERRY TRE E LN
SUGAR PINE LN
CA MPHOR TRE E LN
BIRCHBA RK LN
BOTTLE BRUSH LN
APPLE TREE LN
SMILEY DR
SAGUARO DR
WIMBLETON CT
CE NTER ST
GRAND ST
ORANGE S T
CY PRESS S T
CLA RK ST
VISTA RIDGE DR
VISTA RIDGE DR
W
ATER
W
H
E
E
L
W
A
Y
STONEBROOK DR
BRYNHURST RD
BOLINGER CIR
BOLINGER CIR
BO
LING
E
R
C
IR
BOLINGER DR
HE ARTHSIDE S T
MURRIETTA PL
BATAVIA ST
LOFTWOOD LN
HA RTFORD RD
CA NNON S T
MADRID LN
KENDRA LOOP
KENDRA LOOP
KENDRA LOOP
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
WEEPING WILLOW AVE
TULIP TREE AV E
TULIP TREE AV E
WEEPING WILLOW AVE
PEBBLE CRE EK LN
PEBBLE CRE EK LNSHADYVALE ST
SHADYVALE ST
SUGARBERRY S T
SUNRISE CT
SPICEWOOD ST
RIV ERBEND PKWY
RIV ERBEND PKWY
SPARKLEB ERRY AVE
CORK TREE DR
CORK TREE DR
RIV ERBEND PKWYTORREY PINE LN
LINDEN DR
MOUNTAIN HOLLY AVE
JUNEBERRY ST
HONEY TRE E WAY
RIV ERBEND PKWY
RIV ERBEND PKWY
CA MPHOR
PL
JAMBOREE RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
NICKY WAY
JACK PINE LN
TAFT AVE
VI LLAGETOWNCENTER
GRIJALV A WY
BOND AVE
LITTLE LN
DE EP SPRINGS RD
DESIGNER
DR
GLEN DR
MORADA DR
HE WES ST
DE NIS E AVE
VILLAREALDR
KENDRADR
TUSTIN ST
CANN
O
N
ST
THE CITY DR
TUSTIN ST
EARLHAM ST
LEWIS ST LEWIS ST
PARK VINE S T
ESPLANADE ST
ALEXANDER LN
LA VETA DR
SILVERWOOD ST
BOBW HITE W AY
SHOSHONE AVE
BATAVIA ST
RUTH PL
ALMOND AVE
CE NTER ST
PALM AVE
LA CAPELLA CT
LA
C
O
LINA
C
T
GARRITYWAY
LORETTA DR
DOROTHY AVE
SAN JUAN DR
ORANGE GROVE AVE
MAPLEWOOD ST
VILLANUEVA DR
GABRIELLE LN GABRIEL LE LN
VILLANUEVA DR
MAPLEWOOD ST
R-O
R-O
R-O
R-O
R-O
R-3
M-1
R-3 C-1
C-2 R-1-7
C-2R-2-6 (A)R-2-6 (A)
R-3 R-1-6 R-2-6 (A)R-O R-3
R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7
R-3
R-1-7R-1-6
R-1-6R-1-7R-3R-3
R-1-7
R-3
R-1-7R-1-6R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3R-3 R-1-7
R-3 R-2-6 R-3 R-1-7
R-3
R-1-7
R-2-8
R-2-8 M-1 M-2
M-1 M-2
M-2
M-1
M-2M-1M-1M-1 M-2M-2
R-O M-2
M-2M-1
M-2
M-2 M-2
M-2 M-2
M-2R-O
M-2 M-2
M-2
M-2M-2
M-2 M-2
M-2M-2
M-2
M-2 M-2 M-2
M-2
M-1
M-2
M-2
M-2 M-2
M-1
M-2
M-2
R-3 R-3
R-1-8 R-1-8
R-1-8 R-1-8R-3 R-3 C-TRR-1-7
C-1
P-C
P-C
P-C
R-1-6
(SP)
R-3
(SP)
R-1-6
(SP)
P-C
R-3 R-3 R-2-6 R-1-8
C-1 R-3
R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7 C-TRR-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-7
R-3(A)R-3(A)
R-1-7 R-1-7
C-TR
R-3 R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1 -7
R-1-7R-1-7R-3
(A) M-H
R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7
C-TR
R-1-7
C-1 R-3 C-TRR-3 C-PC-P
C-TR
R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7
R-3R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7O-P
R-1-8
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-8
M-2
R-1-8 R-1-7
R-1-8R-1-8
R-1-8
C-TRM-2
R-1-8
R-1-10
R-1-7
R-1-7
C-1
R-1-8 R-1-7
R-1-10 R-1-10R-1-8
R-3M-1
R-1-10 R-1-10
C-1
R-1-8R-3 R-1-8
R-1-8R-1-8C-1
R-3
R-1-8 R-1-8
R-3
R-3
R-3R-3
R-1-8R-1-8
R-1-8M-1 R-1-8C-1
R-1-8 C-TRR-3R-2-6 R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8R-1-8C-1 R-3
R-1-8 R-1-8
R-3
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8M-1 R-1-8
C-TRC-1 R-1-8 R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8R-1-6R-3
R-3
R-O
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7R-1-7R-O R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7O-PC-1 R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7R-1-7C-2
R-3
R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7R-1-7
R-2-6 R-2-6R-3 R-2-6
(P)C-1
R-1-7R-3 R-2-6
R-1-7 R-2-6
R-3
O-PC-2
C-1
R-3C-1
O-PO-P C-1 O-P C-TRC-2 O-P
R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7R-3R-1-7 R-3R-1-7 C-1
R-3R-2-6 R-1-7 R-1-7
C-1 R-1-7
R-3R-1-7R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7
R-3
R-3
R-2-6 C-TRR-3
R-1-7
C-1
R-O R-1-7
C-1
R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6
C-TR R-1-6 P-C P-CR-1-6R-1-6
R-1-6
P-CR-1-6
R-1-6R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6
R-4
(SP) R-1-6 P-I R-1-6
R-2-6R-1-6
OTMU-15
(SP)
OTMU-15R-O R-1-6 R-2-6 R-1-6R-2-6
R-2-6R-3 R-1-6 R-2-6R-2-6
R-1-6
R-1-6R-1-6
R-1-6
P-I
(SP)
P-I
(SP)
R-1-6
P-CP-CR-1-6
R-1-6 P-C
R-1-6R-1-6
C-TR
R-1-6 A-1 P-CR-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6 P-CR-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6 P-C
R-1-6 P-CR-1-20
R-1-10 R-1-10R-1-10 R-1-6 P-CR-1-6 P-C R-1-8 P-CA-1P-C
C-TR
O-P P-C M-1R-1-6 A-1R-1-8R-1-20 R-1-8R-1-20
R-3 R-1-10(A) P-CR-1-10 R-1-6R-1-6R-1-10R-1-10R-1-8 R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6C-TR R-1-10 A-1
R-1-6R-1-6 P-CR-1-20 R-1-6R-1-8 R-1-8R-1-10R-1-8R-3 R-1-6R-1-8 R-1-6R-1-6(A) R-1-8 R-1-8 R-1-20
R-1-8 R-1-8 P-C
M-H
O-PR-1-6 R-3 R-1-6 R-1-6C-3R-3 (P)O-P C-1R-1-6C-3 (P)R-2-6 (A) (P) R-3
OTMU-24
(SP)
OTMU-15
(SP)R-1-6R-3
R-2-6
P-I (SP)
OTMU-2
4 (SP)
R-4
OTMU-15S
(SP)
OTMU-24
(SP)
UMU
C-1
UMU
R-2-6 M-H
R-1-6UMU R-1-6C-1
O-P R-3 R-3C-1R-2-6 R-3C-1C-1 R-1-7R-2-6
R-2-6
R-2-6 R-2-6R-2-6O-PR-3
R-1-6
R-1-6
OTMU-15S OTMU-15S
(SP)
R-1-8 P-CR-1-8R-1-20
P-CC-TR P-C P-CR-1-7
R-1-20 P-C
R-1-7
R-1-8 P-CP-C
R-1-8
R-1-8 P-C A-1
R-OR-1-8
R-3 R-1-8
R-3
R-3 R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-6 R-1-6M-2 M-2 R-1-6R-O R-1-6
M-1
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-3M-2 R-1-6R-1-6
C-1R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6R-3 R-3M-2
M-2 R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6
C-2 C-2 R-3C-1 R-1-7P-I P-CR-3R-1-6 R-1-7R-3
R-1-6 R-3
R-1-6
R-2-6
R-3R-2-6 R-3 R-2-6C-1 R-2-6R-3 R-3 R-1-7 R-1-6R-2-6
R-3
UMU
M-1 R-1-6R-1-6
C-1R-1-6 P-IM-2M-1 R-2-6
(SP)R-2-6R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6R-2-6 R-2-6
C-1C-1R-3 R-1-6R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3R-1-6
R-3
R-3 R-1-7 R-3R-2-6R-2-6 R-1-7R-2-6
R-3 P-CR-3 R-3R-3 UMUR-2-6 R-1-6 R-1-7 R-1-7 R-1-7R-3R-3 C-1UMU R-3
R-2-6 UMUR-O
R-3 R-1-20
C-TR R-1-40R-3 R-1-8
R-3 (A)
(A)
R-1-8 R-1-8 R-1-8R-3(A) R-OR-3 P-IR-1-8
R-1-8 R-1-8
R-3 R-1-8 R-1-8 R-1-8
R-3 R-1-8
OTMU-15S
R-1-8 R-O
R-1-8R-1-8 R-1-8R-1-12 R-1-8 R-1-8R-1-8
C-TR R-1-12 R-1-8R-1-8 R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8 R-1-8 R-O R-1-40R-1-8R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-10S-GS-G S-GR-1-8
R-1-8 R-1-40 R-1-40R-1-10R-1-10R-1-8R-1-8M-1 R-1-8 R-1-8 R-1-20R-1-8R-1-8
R-1-8 R-1-8
R-1-40R-1-8 S-G
R-OR-1-40 R-1-20R-1-8
R-1-10
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7
S-G R-OS-GC-1
C-1 R-1-7C-TR
R-1-7
R-1-7R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7O-P
R-1-7 O-P O-P
C-TR
R-O
P-I
P-C
P-C
C-PC-1 C-P
C-TRC-PR-1-6R-3 R-1-6C-R R-3C-2
R-1-6R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6
R-3M-2
R-3
R-1-6M -1
R-1-6
M-1
O-PR-3P-I R-1-6
P-C
P-C P-C
OTMU-15
(SP)
R-1-6
(SP) R-3 (SP)
OTMU-15
(SP)
P-C
R-1-6 R-1-6M-2 M-2
R-3 R-2-6
R-2-6 (A)R-1-6R-1-6R-1-6C-1 R-1-6 C-1(A)R-1-6 R-3
R-2-6 (A)C-1 R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6R-1-6
P-C
R-1-6
R-2-6
P-C
P-C
P-C
P-C
R-2-6
(A)
M-2 M-H
R-3 (A)
R-3 (A)
M-1
M-2 M-2
R-3 (A)R-1-6
R-2-6 (A)
R-3 (A)M-1 M-2M-2 R-1-6C-1 R-1-6R-O M-1
R-1-6
R-2-6
P-I
(SP)
OTMU-15S
R-1-6 R-1-6
P-I (SP)
P-1 (SP)
C-1(A)R-1-6C-1C-1 R-1-6 R-1-6
O-P
M-1 C-1M-1 M-2
C-1 R-1-6 O-P
C-1R-1-6M-2 R-3M-2 R-1-6R-3M-2 M-2
R-3
R-1-6
C-1
M-1
O-PM-2
M-2 R-1-6R-1-6R-3 R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6M-2 R-2-6
R-2-6R-1-6R-1-6R-3
M-1
R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6R-O
R-3O-P M-2
R-2-6M-1
R-1-6R-2-6
C-P O-P R-1-6M-1 R-2-6 R-2-6(A)R-3 R-1-6R-3 R-3 R-1-6 R-1-6 UMU
R-1-6 R-3R-1-6 R-1-6
CRTDIS
R-1-6
R-1-6
(SP)
M-1
R-3 R-1-6 C-1R-1-6 R-1-6
R-3R-1-6
R-2-6
OTMU-15S
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-2-6 R-2-6R-1-6
R-2-6
P-I (SP)
P-I
(SP)
P-I (SP)
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-2-6R-1-6R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6 C-2R-1-6 R-1-6R-2-6 R-3R-1-6
R-1-6 P-I (SP)R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6 R-O R-1-6R-1-6R-1-6
R-2-6P-I
(SP)
P-I (SP)
P-C (SP)
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6M-H R-1-6
R-1-6R-1-6
C-1
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6
R-1-6R-1-6
OTMU-15S
R-1-6 R-1-6R-2-6 R-3
(SP) R-2-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6R-1-6 O-PR-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6 R-2-6R-2-6 (A) R-1-6R-1-6R-1-6 R-3P-I R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6 (SP)
R-1-6R-3
R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6
P-I
P-I
C-2C-2
OTMU-15S
OTMU-15S
P-I
(SP)
P-I
(SP)
R-3
R-1-6 R-3
R-1-6UMU
UMU
C-1 R-1-6
R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6(A)(A) R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6
OTMU-24
(SP)R-3 O-P
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
P-I (SP)
OTMU-15
(SP)
P-I
(SP)
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6R-2-6 R-1-6
R-1-6
R-3R-1-6 R-1-6R-3
R-3 (A) OTMU-24
(SP)R-1-6C-1O-P R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6R-3 (A) R-1-6C-1 C-1
OTMU-15
(SP)
R-O
(SP)
OTMU-15
(SP)
OTMU-15
(SP)
R-1-6
UMU
R-1-6
C-1R-3R-3R-3 R-1-6(A)
R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6(A) (A) C-1 R-2-6R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6
NMU-24
NMU-24
C-1 R-1-6
OTMU-15
(SP)
OTMU-15
(SP)
P-I (SP)
P-I (SP) P-I (SP)
R-1-6 R-3R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6
R-1-6
R-2-6
R-1-6R-O
R-3
R-1-6 R-1-
6 C-2
R-3
C-2
R-1-6
NMU-24
NMU-24 NMU-24
C-R
C-R
UMU
R-1-
6 C-1
R-3 (SP)
M-2
(SP)
P-I
(SP)
R-2-6 (SP)
OTMU-15
(SP)
C-2R-3C-2
R-1-6C-2C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2C-2 C-2 O-POTMU-15S OTMU-15S
(SP) C-1 OTMU-15SOTMU-15S C-1
UMU
UMU
P-C
O-P O-P O-P O-PC-2 C-2 OTMU-15SC-2C-2C-2
OTMU-24
(SP)C-2 C-2
OTMU-15
C-2 R-3C-2 R-3 R-2-6 R-3
UMU
UMU UMU
UMU
UMUUMU
OTMU-15SC-1
C-2 (P) O-POTMU-15SR-1-6
C-1 O-PO-PO-PR-1-6 O-PR-1-6 C-2
P-I
R-2-6
R-2-6R-3R-1-6
C-2
OTMU-15
R-3
OTMU-15
R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6
R-1-6
(A)R-1-6 (A)R-1-6 R-2-6 (A)R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6R-3 P-I R-1-6NMU-24
R-1-6
(SP)
UMU
UMU
UMU
R-3R-1-6M-H
R-2-6
R-1-6
P-I R-1-6O-PR-3
OTMU-15S
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6 (SP)
R-1-6
R-4 (SP) R-1-6R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6 R-2-6 (A) (A)R-2-6R-1-6R-1-6
OTMU-15SR-3 R-2-6
O-PNMU-24 R-1-6R-3R-3 R-1-6 R-1-6 R-2-6 R-1-6R-2-6R-1-6 C-1R-1-6C-1 R-1-6
O-P R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6 C-1C-1 R-1-6R-3 R-1-6R-1-6R-O R-1-6 R-1-6M-H R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6R-3 R-1-6
OTMU-15
R-1-6R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-2-6 (A)
R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-4R-1-6 R-1-6
R-4
OTMU-15S
C-1
R-1-6 R-1-6O-P R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6R-3 R-1-6
P-I
NMU-24
O-P
P-I
R-3 R-1-6O-PR-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6 R-4R-3
R-1-6
NMU-24
OTMU-15
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6 R-2-6R-1-6
R-1-6
R-2-6R-1-6
R-4R-4
O-P
R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6R-1-6R-O
R-3 R-2-6 R-1-7R-3
UMU P-CC-1 R-3 R-1-6R-3
R-3O-P
R-1-6
OTMU-15
(SP)
OTMU-24
(SP)
OTMU-15S
R-O R-1-7R-3R-3 O-PUMUR-2-6
R-3UMU R-1-6R-OR-3 UMUUMU
R-4
C-1
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-20
R-1-10
R-1-10
R-1-20R-1-10 R-1-10
R-1-40
R-1-10
R-1-20R-1-10R-1-8 R-1-20
R-1-8
R-1-8 R-1-10
R-1-40
R-1-10
O.C.F.C.D.
R-1-8R-1-8
R-1-40
R-1-40
O.C.F.C.D.
R-1-10R-1-6 R-1-8O-PR-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-8
O.C.F.C.D.
OTMU-15S OTMU-15S OTMU-15S
R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6
R-1-8 R-1-8C-TR
R-1-6 O.C.F.C.D.
R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-8R-1-8
O.C.F.C.D.
R-3 R-1-40R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-8
R-1-20
R-1-8
(P.U.D. 706-75)
R-1-8R-3 R-1-6 R-1-6
C-TR R-1-8
R-1-8R-1-6
R-1-6R-3 R-1-6
R-1-10
R-1-6 R-1-8R-3 R-3 R-1-40R-1-7
R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-20R-3C-1 R-1-7 R-1-40S-G
R-O
R-3 R-1-10R-3 R-1-40R-1-6 P.U.D.R-1-6
R-1-7 R-1-8R-1-7R-3
P.U.D.R-1-40R-1-6 R-1-6R-3 R-1-40R-1-10R-1-7 R-1-8R-1-8 R-3
R-3 R-1-10
R-1-6 R-1-6M-H
R-1-7R-3 R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-40
R-1-6 R-1-10R-3 R-1-7R-1-6 R-1-7
R-1-6 R-1-10 R-1-40A-1R-1-6C-1
R-3 R-1-8R-1-6(A)R-3 R-1-6 R-1-7 R-1-40R-3
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6 R-OC-1 R-2-6 (A) P-I
R-1-10S-GR-3
R-3
R-3
R-1-6 R-1-15
R-3 R-1-40
R-3 R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6(A) R-3 R-1-7
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-7
R-1-10
R-1-7 R-1-7A-1
R-1-6C-1 R-3
R-1-6 R-1-7(A) R-1-40
R-1-6
(A)
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-15M-H
R-1-7R-1-6 R-1-15
R-1-6O-P (A)R-3 R-2-6 (A)
R-1-6C-1 P.U.D.R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-7 R-1-15 R-1-15
R-1-6 R-1-6C-1 R-1-6
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7R-1-6 R-1-7R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6 R-3R-1-6 R-1-6 P-IR-1-7 R-1-7R-1-6
C-1 R-1-6 R-O R-1-7R-3 R-1-6 R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-6
(A)
(A) R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-7
R-3
R-3 A-1 R-1-20R-O R-1-40R-3
R-1-7 P.U.D.R-1-7
R-1-40R-1-7C-1 C-1R-1-40
R-1-6 R-O
R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-7R-1-6 R-1-7
R-1-6 R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-6 R-1-7R-3 R-1-6 P.U.D. P-I
R-3 P-CR-1-40 P-CP-C
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7
(A)
(A) R-O R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-6 P-CR-1-6
R-3 R-O
R-2-6 R-1-6 R-1-7R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6
R-1-7
R-1-6 P-CR-1-20R-1-7R-1-6 R-4R-1-6 R-1-20R-3 P-C P-CR-1-6 P-CR-1-20 R-1-7 R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-7 P-CR-O P-C
R-3 R-1-7R-3
R-1-7R-3 R-1-6 R-1-20A-1 P-CR-1-6 R-4R-3 R-1-6 P-CR-1-7R-1-7 P-CC-1 R-1-7 P-C R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-6
R-1-7 R-1-6R-2-6 R-1-7 P-CC-1 P-C
R-3
R-1-7R-1-20C-P
C-1 P-C
R-2-6C-2 P-CC-1
P-I
P-C(A)R-3 C-1R-2-6 P-C
M-H P-C
R-1-7
C-1 R-1-20O-P C-1 R-3 P-C
C-1
C-1C-1 C-1 C-1C-1 R-4 A-1 P-C
R-1-6 P-CC-1 C-1 C-2 P-CR-1-7R-1-6C-1 C-1
C-1C-1 C-1C-1 C-1 C-1C-1 C-1
C-1 R-1-6C-1 P-C
(A) O-P R-1-20
C-1 P-CC-2 R-3R-3 R-1-7 P-CR-3 C-1 P.U.D. R-1-7R-1-6R-2-6 R-3 P-CR-2-6R-3 R-2-6 R-2-6(A) R-3
R-2-6 P-CR-1-6 P-C
R-3R-1-7R-O R-2-6
R-1-6 P-CR-2-7R-2-6 P-CR-3 R-2-6 R-1-6R-2-6R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-6R-3
(A) R-1-20 R-1-20 P-CR-2-6 R-1-20
R-1-7 R-1-7
(A) P-C(A)R-3
R-3
C-1
R-1-7
R-1-7 P.U.D.
R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7 R-2-8
R-1-7R-1-7
R-3 P-C
R-2-6
R-2-6
P-C
(A)
R-1-7 R-1-20 R-1-7R-2-6R-3 (A)
R-3R-1-7 P-C
P.U.D. R-1-7R-3R-2-6 (A) R-1-20R-1-7 P-CR-1-7 R-1-20
R-1-7 R-2-6R-1-7 R-OR-3 P.U.D.R-3C-1 P.U.D.(A) R-1-7 R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-20R-1-7R-1-7 R-3 R-3R-1-7 P.U.D.R-3 R-1-7 R-3R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-20
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-20M-H R-1-7
C-1 R-OR-1-6R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7 P.U.D.R-1-6 R-O
R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-6R-1-7R-3R-3 R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8 R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8R-1-8 R-1-8 R-1-8R-1-7R-3 R-1-8
C-1 R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-7 R-1-8C-2 R-1-8 R-1-8R-1-8R-1-8 R-1-7R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8R-1-8 R-1-8
R-1-8
R-2-7R-2-7
R-1-8C-1
R-2-7 R-1-8R-2-7 R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-8
R-1-8R-2-7
R-1-8
R-O
P-C
P-C
R-3
R-3
R-1-8
R-2-7
P.U.D.
R-2-7
P.U.D.
R-2-7
P.U.D.
P.U.D.
R-2-7
P.U.D.
R-2-7
P.U.D.
R-1-40
P.U.D.
R-1-40
P.U.D.
R-2-7
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-2-6
(A)
R-1-6(P)
R-O
R-O
S-H
P-I
R-3
UMU
UMU
UMU
C-1
R-2-6
R-O
R-O
R-O
R-1-12
O-P
R-2-6R-3
C-2 C-2
R-3 R-3
C-2
R-2-6
R-2-6
R-3
R-2-6(A)
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-6(P)
R-3
R-1-8
R-3
O-P
P-I (SP)
P-I (SP)
R-1-6
R-1-10
R-1-10R-1-10
R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-20
R-1-20
R-1-15
R-1-10
R-1-40
R-1-40
R-1-40
R-1-20
R-1-20
R-1-12
P-C
R-O R-O
OTMU-15
OTMU-15
OTMU-15
OTMU-15
OTMU-15
OTMU-15
OTMU-15S OTMU-15S OTMU-15S
R-O
R-1-6
R-1-7
R-1-8
O-PO-P
R-1-40
P-I
C-1
C-1
P-I (SP)
O-P
UMU
UMU C-R
R-3 (SP)
UMU
UMU
UMU
5 55
91 57
91 57
22 55
241
261
241
241
CITY OF ORANGE
ZONING MAP
Legend
Residential
Max. Mult. FamilyR-4
Limited
BusinessC-1
General
BusinessC-2
CommercialC-3
Commercial
Professional
C-P
Commercial
RecreationC-R
Light
ManufacturingM-1
IndustrialM-2
Mobile
HomeM-H
Office
ProfessionalO-P
Public
InstitutionP-I
Planned
CommunityP-C
Sand & GravelS-G
O.C.F.C.D.OCFCD
UnzonedUNZONED
Public Institution
Chapman University
Santa Fe Depot
St Johns
P-I (SP)
Urban Mixed UseUMU
Neighborhood Mixed UseNMU-24
Old Towne Mixed Use-15OTMU-15
Old Towne Mixed Use
Spoke StreetOTMU-15S
Old Towne Mixed Use-24OTMU-24
Limited Business
Tustin Redevelopment
Project Area
C-TR
National Register Old Towne Historic District
Local Old Towne Orange Historic District (1998)
Single Family Res.
6000 sq ftR-1-6
Single Family Res.
7000 sq ftR-1-7
Single Family Res.
8000 sq ftR-1-8
Single Family Res.
10000 sq ftR-1-10
Single Family Res.
12000 sq ftR-1-12
R-1-12-E
Single Family Res.
12000 sq ft
Equestrian Overlay District
Single Family Res.
15000 sq ftR-1-15
Single Family Res.
20000 sq ftR-1-20
Single Family Res.
40000 sq ftR-1-40
Residential Duplex
6000 sq ftR-2-6
Residential Duplex
7000 sq ftR-2-7
Residential Duplex
8000 sq ftR-2-8
Residential
Multiple FamilyR-3
AgriculturalA-1
Recreation
Open SpaceR-O
Slope & HazardS-H
Residential Multiple Family
Single Story OverlayR-3(A)
Residential Duplex
6000 sq ft
Parking Overlay
R-2-6 (P)
Residential Duplex
6000 sq ft
Single Story Overlay
R-2-6 (A)
Single Family Res.
6000 sq ft
Parking Overlay
R-1-6 (P)
Single Family Res.
6000 sq ft
Single Story Overlay
R-1-6 (A)
Single Family Res.
7000 sq ft
Parking Overlay
R-1-7 (P)
Residential Multiple Family
Parking OverlayR-3(P)
I
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500
Feet
300 E CHAPMAN AVE
ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92866
NOTE: Some recent changes and improvements may
not have been added to the map at the time of printing.
No part of this map shall be reproduced for
commercial purposes.
Map prepared by :
Public Works G.I.S. Section
on September 1st, 2020
Project
·|}þ
·|}þ·|}þ
·|}þ
·|}þ
§¨¦
·|}þ
·|}þ
·|}þ
·|}þ
·|}þ
·|}þ
COUNTY
ORANGE
PARK
ACRES
CITY
NORTH
EL MODENA
COUNTY
COUNTY
EL MODENA
OLIVE
TUSTIN
ANAHEIM
ORANGE
SPHERE OF
INFLUENCE
ANAHEIM
COUNTY
GARDEN
GROVE
SANTA ANA
VILLA PARK
ORANGE
SPHERE OF
INFLUENCE
McPherson
Youth Sport
Facility
Canyon
High
School
Yorba
Middle
School
California
Elementary
School
Serrano
Elementary
School
Handy
Elementary
School
Fletcher
Elementary
Linda Vista
Elementary
School
Anaheim Hills
Elementary
School
Esplanade
Elementary
School
Jordan
Elementary
School
Santiago
Charter
School
McPherson
Magnet
School
Career
Education
Center
Richland
High
School
La Veta
Elementary
School
Palmyra
Elementary
School
Portola
Middle
School
Lampson
Elementary
School
West Orange
Elementary
School
Riverdale
Elementary
School
Olive
Elementary
School
Imperial
Elementary
School
Sycamore
Elementary
School
Santiago
Canyon
College
Canyon Rim
Elementary
School
Panorama
Elementary
School
El Modena
High
School
Orange
High
School
Villa Park
High
School
Cerro Villa
Middle
School
Taft
Elementary
School
Villa Park
Elementary
Chapman Hills
Elementary
School
Fairhaven
Elementary School
Cambridge
Elementary
School Prospect
Elementary
School
Nohl Canyon
Elementary
School
Chapman
University
Lincoln
Park
Pioneer
Park
Juarez
Park
Boysen
Park
Ponderosa
Park
El Camino
Real
Park
Santa Fe
Depot
Park
Shaffer
Park
Olive
Park
Pitcher
Park
Yorba
Park
La Veta
Park
Grijalva
Community
Park
El
Modena
Park
Olive Hills
Park
Belmont
Park
Pelanconi
Park
Imperial
Park
Serrano
Park
Cerro Villa
Park
Oak
Park
Canyon
Rim
Park
Rio Vista
Park
Killefer
Park
Santiago Oaks
Regional Park
and Nature Center
Fred Barrera
Park
Eisenhower
Park
Handy
Park
Santiago
Hills
Park
Hart
Park
Irvine
Regional
Park
Peters Canyon
Regional
Park
Main
Library
Water
Plant
Corporation
Yard
Library
Taft
Branch
Police
Headquarter
City
Hall
Library
Main
Place
U.S.
Post
Office
Anaheim Hills
Golf Course
Oak Canyon
Nature
Center
Holy
Sepulcher
Cemetery
Fairhaven
Memorial
Park
Crystal
Cathedral
Edison
Substation
Fire
Stn 8
Fire
Stn 5
Fire
Stn 4
Fire
Stn 3
Fire
Stn 2
Fire
Stn 1
C.H.O.C.
St. Joseph
Hospital
Chapman
Medical
Center
Weir
Canyon
Regional
Park
El
Modena
Branch
The Island
Golf
Center
Super Sport
Golf & Recreation
Center
IRWD
Santiago Hills
Reservoir
Santiago Canyon
Landfill
Police
Dept
The Village
at
Orange
Formerly
Ridgeline
Country
Club
Fire
Stn 7
Fire
Stn 6
UCI
Medical
Center
Honda
Center
Anaheim
Stadium
PETERS
CANYON
RESERVOIR
VILLA
PARK
DAM
The
Outlets
at
Orange
Metrolink
Parking
Structure
MOUNTAIN V IEW AVE
VIA HILO DR
STA TE COLLEGE BLVD
VIA MAUI
MANCHES TE R A VE
CHRIS LN
ANAHEIM BLVDVIA TAHITI
BETMOR LN
SANTA CRUZ ST
VIA KONA DR
CITRUS DR
GENE AUTRY WAY GENE AUTRY WAY
WAKEFIELD AV E
TANGERINE LN
VIA DEL RAY
MOUNTAIN V IEW AVE
LEATRICE L NLEATRICE L N
RIV ERA LN
STA NFORD CT SANTA CRUZ ST
PEARSON A VE
NA UTICAL ST
JETTY DR
SPINNAKER ST
ORANGEW OOD A VE ORANGEW OOD A VE
ORANGEW OOD A VE
MOUNTAIN V IEW AVE
SIMMONS A VE SIMMONS A VE
TILLER AV E TILLER AV E
SIRIUS AVE SIRIUS AVE
COMPTON AVE
JETTY DR
SUNNINGDA LE CIR
CHAP MAN AVE CHAP MAN AVE CHAP MAN AVE
LEWIS ST
MEDICA L CE NTER DRLAGUNA ST
THE CITY DR
ADRIA N S T
LEWIS ST
SALERNO S T
DA WN WAYANZIO ST
DA WN AVE
GREENTRE E AVE
METROPOLITAN DR
ADRIA N CIR
LEW
IS
ST
GARDEN GROVE BLVD
LORETTA LN
CHAP MAN AVE
MILLS DR ROBIN RDMARKS WAYMILLS DR
ANITA DR
ALMOND AVE
LOUISE PL
FLOWER ST
CA STLE CIR
CA RME N CIR
CA MILLE CIR
MARIE PL
LARKSPUR DR
PALMYRA A VE
FLOWER ST
DE VON RD
CULVE R A VE
FLOWER ST PLUM LN
FLOWER ST
FLOWER CIR
SILKTRE E CIR
DE VON RD
SHERWOOD LN FALLB ROOK DR
FAIRBROOK LN
ORANGE RD
CORRIGAN AVE
BRISTOL ST
FLOWER ST
OLIVE LN
LOWELL LN
FREEMA N L NSHERWIN LN
MEMORY LN
ECKHOFF ST
ORANGEW OOD A VE
ORANGEW OOD A VE
DUPONT DR
DUPONT DR
CHERRY DR
CE DA R S T
ASH ST
STE VENS STFLOWER ST
BITTERBUSH ST
PALM AVE PALM AVE WILLOW A VE
HE MLOCK ST
RA MPART S T
DONNE YBROOKE ST
MAPLE AV E
ARBOR WAY
BITTERBUSH ST
STE VENS ST
ECKHOFF ST
SUNB URST WA Y
BELHAVEN S TOMEGA AVE
LARK ELLEN LN
TAFT AVESUNKIST
ST
CA RL S T
SHIRLE Y ST
SANDERSON AV E
SUNK IST S T
PAGE CT
STA DIUM VIEW AVE
SINCLA IR S T
KATELLA AV E
KATELLA AVE
DOUGLAS S T
KRAEMER BLV D
VIA LUCERA
JACKSON AVE
VIA PORTO
VIA FERRA RI
TREVOR STBETH CIR
KINGSLEY ST
JEANINE WA Y
ALICE CIRBETH CIR
KINGSLEY ST
LINCOLN A VE
CRYS TAL V IEW AV E
SOUTH S T
BROOK SHIRE AVE
CINDA ST
BRENTWOOD AV EBRENTWOOD AV E
G
LAS
SELL
ST
WESTWAY A VE
CINDA ST
GREENWAY AVE
FLETCHER AVE
CULLY DR
BAYWOOD AV E
SOUTHE RN A VE
PACIFIC ST
MEATS AVE
BATAVIA ST
BLUERIDGE AV E
BLUERIDGE AVE
NE VILLE ST
CA SE ST
BATAVIA ST
NE VILLE ST
LIME ST
ST. THOMAS CIR
TAFT AVE
TAFT AVE
MAIN ST
LESLIE WA Y
BRIAN ST
LEVERS PLYALE AV E
BATAVIA ST
MANZANITA ST
MAIN ST
KATELLA AV E
KATELLA AV E
PARKER ST
BATAVIA ST
STRUCK AV E
STRUCK AV E
PARKER ST
BATAVIA ST
LEMON ST
ELM ST
PARKER STMAIN ST
ELM ST
MAIN ST
BARKLEY A VE
BARKLEY AVE
SHELLY CT
CY PRESS S T
LEMON ST
HA RITON ST
ANGUS AVE
ALVAREZ AVE
GLASS ELL ST
BATAVIA ST
MAIN ST
PRIMROSE DR
OLIVE S T
CLA RK ST
PARKER ST
WALNUT AV EORANGEW OOD A VE WALNUT AV E
EMERALD DR
CITRUS ST
CHERRY DR
SYCAMORE AVE
CLA RK STBIRCH AV E
PARKER ST
ELM ST
LIME ST
CITRUS ST
PALM AVE
PALM DR
MAIN ST
LIME ST
ACACIA AVE
MAPLE AV E
PIXLEY S TPARKER ST
CITRUS ST
ATCHISON S T LEMON ST
LESTER DR
JEWE LL PL CY PRESS S TBATAVIA ST
CHAP MAN AVE
LIME ST
CY PRESS S TPIXLEY S T
BUSH ST
ALMOND AVE
WASHINGTON AV E
BUSH ST
FOLEY PL MARIETTA P L
PIXLEY S T
PALMYRA A VEPALMYRA A VE
PALMYRA A VE
COLUMBIA PL
CULVE R A VE
CULVE R A VECULVE R A VE
BATAVIA ST
PARKER ST
PIXLEY S T
ALPINE RD
OLIVE S T
MAIN ST
LA VETA AV E
LA VETA AV E
BEDFORD RD
TOWN & COUNTRY RD
MAIN ST
PARKER ST
MEMORYLN
CE NTER ST
HA RW OOD S T WATER ST
SHAFFER ST
ORANGE S T
JAMES ON ST
LINCOLN S T
GARDNER DRPALMYRA A VE
HA RW OOD S T
CE NTER ST
VAN BIBBE R AVE
GREENGROVE DR
CA LIFORNIA STPENN DR
CULVE R A VE
CULVE R A VE
TUSTIN ST
CHALY NN CIR
PINE ST
LA VETA AV E
FAIRWA Y DR
LAKE DR
CA MBRIDGE ST
GREENVIEW DR
ALBION LN
WOODB URY DRCLE MENSEN AVE
BARKLEY A VE
GRAND ST
ORANGE S T
CA MBRIDGE ST
LOMITA AVE
LOMITA AVELOMITA AVE LOMITA AVESHAFFER ST
OAKMONT A VE OAKMONT A VE
W
ARBLER PL
FERN ST
ALTA DRBLUERIDGE AV E
BLUERIDGE AV E
HA RT ST
HIGHLAND S T
DIA MOND ST
OAKFIELD DRHILLCREST AV E HILLCREST AV E
SACRAMENTO ST M
cCRORY
LN
SMOKE WOOD DR
ALMOND AVE
BURLY AVE
WAYFIELD ST
PARK LN
VIOLET LN
PROSPE CT ST
OAK S T
PALMYRA A VE
VIOLET LN
CA ROLE LN
TRACY LN
RUTH PL
DE BORAH LN
LA VETA AV E
RILE S CIR
BALL RD
SHERMAN ST
STA TE COLLEGE BLVD
WINSTON RD
WINSTON RD
ALLEC ST
VERNON ST
CE RRITOS A VE
CE RRITOS A VE
LEWIS ST
HOWELL AV E
HOWELL AV E
CLA UDINA W AY
CHAP MAN AVE
CHAP MAN AVE
FLOWER ST
HOLLY ST
FELDNER RD
MAPLE AV E
VALENCIA CIR
WALKER RANCH CIR
HA ZEL CIR
LEMON ST
SAN RAMON CIR
LAVENDER CT
W ILDROSE DR
CE NTER ST
BLAKE S T
GRAND ST
BRIARDA LE AVE
DE L MAR AVE
GATES AV E
PINE ST
HE ATHERSTONE DR
DIX ON AVE
ST. MORITZ CIR
RUTH PL
COURT ST
PARK ST
HILL S T
SCHUG ST VIA
LA
C
AN
AD
A
PHILO AVE
JUSTICE CIR
LOS ARBOLES A VE
CRAW FORD CANYON RD
BRAE GLE N
LN
LEAFWOOD LN
GRAMERCY DR
GRAMERCY DR
PL
ETON
PL
YOUNG LN
GAFF S T
ENSIGN CIR
VISTA GLEN RD
ROBINHOOD P L
ROBINHOOD
PL
RIDGECRE ST LN
ROBINHOOD P L
H
ILLM
A
N
C
IR
ORANGE HILL RD
TERRACE V IEW CT
ECHO HIL L WAY
VISTA MESA WAY
VISTA PARK A VE
VISTA CIR
SUNK IST S T
CURTIS WAY CLA RK TER CHARLENE TER JAMBOLAYA ST DUTCH A VE
ROYAL PLUNDERHILL AVE
CA ROUSEL ST
POWHATAN AV E
RIO VISTA ST
STA TE COLLEGE BLVD
PEREGRINE S T
CITADEL LN
HIDDEN CANYON RD
VIA EL ES TRIBO
AVENIDA DE SA NTIAGO
HIDDEN CANYON RD
MARCE LLA LN
SIEMON ST
PARK LN
TOWNLEY ST
PATTI LN
FAIRHAVE N AVE FAIRHAVE N AVEOWENS DR
MAIN ST
McEVOY LN
SNOW GOOS E ST
GOLDEN EA GLE A VE
SWALLOW AVE
BLUE JAY AVE
CONDOR CRE ST A VE
GRANADA DR
CHRISTINE ST
CA PISTRA NO PL
PATR IA CT
CORRIDA P L
GLEN ARRAN LN
AVILA PL
VALENCIA DR
ELSINORE A VE
FERNSIDE S T
PADDLE WHEEL CIR
HA
RTM
A
N
S
T
G
LA
SSE
LL
ST
DUNTON AVE
GREENLEA F AV E
ORANGE OLIVE RD
JIB ST SWELL ST
SANTA FE P L MAPLE TREE DR
PEPPER HILL DR
IVY HILLLN
ORANGE GROVE AVE
WALNUT AV E
CITRUS ST
EMERALD DR
CY PRESS S T
LEMON ST
ORANGE S T
ORANGE S T
MAYFAIR AVE
OAKMONT AVE
PINE STHA RW OOD S T
HA RW OOD S T
PINE ST
BREEZY WAY
ROMELLE A VE
YORBA S T
LORETTA DR
FAIRHAVE N AVE
STA TE COLLEGE BLVD
ANAHEIM WAY
ANAHEIM WAY
ORANGE CE NTER DR
MANCHES TE R A VE
MANCHES TE R A VE
ORANGEW OOD A VE
MANCHES TE R A VE
OAKMONT A VE
MAYFAIR AVE CA LIFORNIA ST LINCOLN S T
MAYFAIR AVE MAYFAIR AVE MAYFAIR AVESHAFFER ST
CA MBRIDGE ST
EVERETT P L
EVERETT P L EVERETT P LEVERETT P L
LINCOLN S T
ROSE AV EROSE AV E ROSE AV E
CA LIFORNIA ST
CA MBRIDGE ST
TUSTIN STSHAFFER ST
ORANGE GROVE AVELINCOLN S T
MADISON AV E MADISON AV E
GRAND ST
WAVERLY S T
GLASS ELL ST
WALNUT AV E
WALNUT AV E
CE NTER ST
PINE ST
CA MBRIDGE ST
SYCAMORE AVE
SYCAMORE AVE SYCAMORE AVE
HICKORY LN
SHATTUCK PL
PINE ST
LINCOLN S T
CE NTER ST
CA MBRIDGE ST
MAGNOLIA ST
PALM AVE
PALM AVE
PALM AVE
DA NA PL
MAPLE AV E
MAPLE AV E
GRAND ST
CE NTER ST
HA RW OOD S T
SHAFFER ST CLE VELAND ST PINE ST
CA MBRIDGE ST
SHATTUCK PLWAVERLY S T
PALMDALE A VE
LINDENHOL Z ST
MAPLEWOOD ST
MARQUART ST
SILVERWOOD ST
SHAFFER ST
EBONYW OOD S TPALMDALE A VE
TAFT AVE TAFT AVE
CA NDLEW OOD A VE
NORDIC DR
CONCORD A VE
CHES TNUT A VE CHES TNUT A VE
TRENTON AVE TRENTON AVE
BAXTER ST
VANOWE N A VEPINE STHA RW OOD S T
KATELLA AV E KATELLA AV E
LARAMIE ST
COLBOW ST
EL CARMEN AVE
GRAVIER ST
OLYMPIA WAY
CE NTER ST
PEARL ST
CHAP MAN AVE
JOCOTAL A VE
RIDGEWOOD LN
CHURCHIL L L N
OLD LAMPLIGHTER CIR
PATRICIAN DR
DORCHES TE R CIR
HA LLSWORTH CIR
KENWICK DR
JEROME ST
ALMA LN
VILLA PARK RD
VILLA PARK RD
CE NTER DR
MILLER CIR
ROSANNE CIR
FRANCISCO DR
CE NTER DR
CA ROLYN CIR
VIDA DR
PLANTA TION PLNORMANDY DR
SHAKESP EARE STSEVILLE A VE
CA ROUSEL ST
CY PRIEN WAY
CE NTER ST DUTCH A VE
MELINDA CIR BILLIE JO CIR
TOWER CT NORMANDY CTOLYMPIA CTLONDON CT ELSIENA W AY
HE MPSTEAD CIRWARD TER
WARD TER
ROYAL PL
WARD TERWARD TER
PARADISE RDLINCOLN A VEOLANA WA Y
CHANTILLY ST
PARADISE LN
ALLEYCA NON LAKE ALLEY
PONDEROS A ST DE ODAR STMAIN ST
EDGEWOOD RD
FRANZEN AVEEVON LN
FRANZEN AVE
CHERRY ST
ALLEYHA NS LN
ALLEYSTA CY LN ALLEYTWE NTY-FOURTH STMONICA LN
BEECHWOOD ST TUSTIN AVE
BEECHWOOD ST
BEECHWOOD ST
HA THAWA Y ST
EASTWOOD AVE
LEWIS ST
WRIGHT S T
MERELET LN
YORBA S T
DE LIA LN
ROSALIND DR
LA VETA AV E
HA NDY CREE K RD
ORANGE GROVE AVE
RA INIE R A VE
ORANGE OLIVE RD
HA RTMAN ST
RICHLAND AVE
WOODS ST
RIV ERDA LE AVE
SANTA ANA C ANYON RD
BAINBRIDGE A VE
FAUNA AVE
JACKSON AVE
ALICE WAY
FRONTERA ST
JACKSON AVE
PARK VISTA S T
ALICE CIR
CONNIE CIR QUEENSBURY S T
GREENHEDGE AVE
CERRO VILLADR
LOMA ST
LOMA ST
FREEDOM AVE
SOUTHE RN A VE
SHAFFER ST SHAFFER ST
SANTIAGO
BLVD CA NY ON CIR
CERR
O
VILLADR
BLAIRWOOD LN
BLAIRWOOD LN
MAIN ST
GROVE AVE GROVE AVE
WOODS IDE ST
WINLOCK ST CHOUTEAU S T
LINDENHOL Z ST
SILVERWOOD ST
EBONYW OOD S T
MEATS AVE
SANTIAGO
BLVD
NICHOLS AVE
SAN
LOR
ENZO
C
T
RUSHMORE ST
SPRING ST
SHASTA ST
DUNAS S T
OLYMPIA WAY
CRAIG DR
KATHLE EN LN
VIOLET LN
ALMOND AVE ALMOND AVE
PALMYRA A VE
CRAIG DR
BURLY AVE
CA ROLET LN
SWIDLER PL
OLYMPIA WAY
WELLINGTON RD
LA VETA AV E
PROSPE CT ST
DUNAS RD
LARKSTONE DR
KIRKWOOD AV
OAKW OOD S T
HE ATHERSTONE ST
CHAP MAN AVE
RE GENCY CIR
MORROW CIR
CHANTILLY ST
CA RDIFF S THILDA S TRE SEDA ST
TURIN AVE PALADIN AVE PALADIN AVE
MARJAN ST
GELID AVE GELID CT GELID CT
VERDE ST
GROVE LAND PLTORRY P L LARAMIE ST WHIDB Y LNRE SEDA ST EVENING STAR DR
CHAUCER ST PEREGRINE P L CLA RE NCE STKEATS ST AMBRIDGE S T
CLIFPARK W AY
ALMONT AVE
HE WES AV
HE WES AV
HARROGATE PL
CONENTRYPL
CAMD EN DR
WICKFORD DR
BRUNSWICKWY
PERIWINKLE DR
SHERRY LYNN DR
COUNTRY HAVE N
COUNTY LN
VILLADELCERRO
HIDEAWAY DR
FENW
ICK
PL
A
M
BERVALE
LN
NEW
PORTBLVD
NEW
PORTBLVD
COUNTRY HILLS DR
COWAN HEIGHTS DR
DA NIGER RD
TERRACEVIEW
RANGERVIEW DR
COW AN HEIGHTS DR
EQUESTRIAN DR
HAMBLETONIAN
PL
CRYS TAL V IEW AV E
DUNFIELD ST
DU
NFIELD
ST
FRA
NK
IST
BORTZ ST
ANCHOR A VE
GALLEY ST
VISTA CT
GLASS ELL ST
ORANGE OLIVE RD
VISTA CT
SANTIA GO B LVD
NA THAN CIR
CY PRESS S T LEMON ST OLIVE S T
GLASS ELL ST
ORANGE S T
GRAND ST CE NTER ST
SHAFFER ST
GLASS ELL STGLASS ELL ST
OLIVE S T
GRAND ST
PINE ST
ALMOND AVE
CHAP MAN AVE
CA MBRIDGE ST WAVERLY S T
HA RW OOD S T
MAPLEWOOD ST
TUSTIN ST
CHAP MAN AVE
TUSTIN ST
CA LIFORNIA ST
SHATTUC
K
PL
HIGHLAND S T
VILLA PARK RD
BLOOMBERRY
CA STLE TOWN
C
AR ISBROOKE
SCOTTS V IEW
HA ZELW OOD
VICKSBERRY
KENWOOD
FLYING E LN
MEADOW LN
MACDONALD LN
DA NIE L LN
ORANGE HILL TER
ROGERS DR
HILLS IDE DR
MEADS AVE
MEADS AVE
HI TOP LN
SHETLA ND LN
VICKIE LN
IVY LN
CLA RK ST
RA NDALL S T
MAGNOLIA ST
MAPLEWOOD ST
PRIVATE
DR
MAGNOLIA AVE
PARK LN
CLOVERDALE A VEDEL MA R AVE
AGATE ST
SERRANO AV E
GROVE AVE
GROVE AVE
GROVE AVE
HIGHLAND S T
CORAL AVE DIA M OND
S
T
CORAL AVE
MARY CIR SANDRA CIRFLORE NCE CIR
PAMELA P L
HE NDERSON WAY
MESA DR
CHARTER RD JAMES CIR
CHRISTINE CIR
FLEE T RD
JAMES RD
VILLA WOODS CIR
ROBB IE CIR
ROBIN WAY
LEIGH CIR
VILLA
W
O
OD
S
D
R
JANICE CIR
EASTWOOD CIR
RY AN CIR ALICE LN
SERRANO AV E
D
ERE
K DR DA RON DR
ORCHA RD LN RA GAN CIR
OAKW OOD CIR
ASPEN STVALENCIA ST
LINW OOD S TFRENCH ST SANTIA GO A VEPOINSETTIA STBUSH ST
PASADENA AVE
SPURGEON ST SANTA CLA RA AVE
SANTA CLA RA AVEOAKMONT A VESANTA CLA RA CIR SANTA CLA RA AVE
SANTA CLA RA AVE
BUFFALO A VELEWIS ST
AVALON A VE
BUFFALO A VE
WEBER CIRBUFFALO A VE
BUFFALO A VE
AVALON A VEBUSH ST AVALON A VE
WALNUT AV E
HA MILTON A VE
ROSE AV E
ORANGE GROVE AVE
WAYFIELD ST
MADISON AV E
WALNUT AV E
PARK LN
MILFORD RD
OXFORD CT
BARRINGTON DR
THOMA S ST
BALMORAL DR
PAGE ANT DR
BERKSHIRE CT
EL CARMEN AVE
ESPANITA ST
COLBY ST
EARLHAM ST
EL SALVA DOR AVE
ESPANITA ST
WHITE DOVE AV E
SWAN ST
BLUEBONNET CT
CHAPARRAL CT
TWINLEA F TRL
HOOVE R A VEHOOVE R A VE
GRAND ST WILSON AV EWILSON AV E WILSON AV E
TUSTIN ST
SHAFFER ST
SHATTUCK ST
LINCOLN S T
ADAMS AVE
ADAMS AVE
ADAMS AVE ADAMS AVE
JACKSON AVE
LINCOLN S T
JACARANDA AV E HA RW OOD S TJACARANDA AV E CA LIFORNIA ST
SHAFFER ST
GRAND ST
CLE VELAND ST
CA MBRIDGE ST
LINCOLN S T
WOODV ALE AV E DAR BY ST
TO
RRE
S
ST
TUSTIN ST
LISA PL
HE IM AVE HE IM AVEASHWOOD ST
CA MEO CT
FELLOWS DR
H
AY
FO
R
D
ST
AMBER AVE
LOVE LN
CA NA L ST
FLAN
DERS ST
ALD
ER
GROVE CIR
GLENDORA A VECOMSTOCK ST
BELLBROOK ST
WATERBERRY ST
MILLBRAE ST
GLENDORA A VE
CA NA L ST
VISTA DEL GA VIOTA AV E NORTHUMBERLAND RD
GLENNWOOD ST
VISTA DEL PLAY A AVE
GREENGROVE ST
VISTA DEL PLAY A AVE
VISTA DEL PLAY A AVE
CUMBE RLA ND RD CUMBE RLA ND RD
CA NA L ST
EMERSON A VE
ORANGE OLIVE RD
HA RW OOD S T
CLE VELAND ST
MEATS AVE
NORDIC STLINC
OLN
ST
CHOUTEAU S T
CA MBRIDGE ST
DE L MAR AVEMAPLEWOOD ST
LINDENHOL Z STSILVERWOOD ST
DE L MAR AVE
GROVE AVE
G
REEN
G
R
O
VE
ST
GROVE AVE
NA MURIA S T
GENESS EE STGROVE AVE
GROVE AVE
B LUERIDGE AVE
GLENDALE DR
GLENDALE A VE GL ENDALE AVEGLENDALE A VE
ORANGE OLIVE RD
FERNDALE A VE
WOODS IDE ST WINLOCK ST RIDGEWOOD ST
NORDIC PL SHATTUCK PL
BRIARDA LE AVE
GAYLE ST SAN CARLOS A VE
BEECHWOOD ST
HE ARTHSIDE S T
ILA DR
RA INIE R A VE HA RTMAN ST
SUNV IEW DRBUTTERFIE LD RDPINEWOOD ST
FAIRBA IRN S T
OCEANVIEW ST
GAYLE ST
SKYWOOD ST
BUTTERFIE LD RD
WESTHAVEN ST
BIXBY A VE
PALM AVE
MAGNOLIA AVE
OCEANVIEW AVE
BUENA VISTA ST BUENA VISTA ST
PALM AVEORANGE A VE
MAIN ST
GLASS ELL ST
LINCOLN A VE
OLIVE A VE
OCEANVIEW AVE
TU
STIN
ST
ANCHO
R
AVE
LINCOLN A VE
BOOM AVE
CA NA L ST
ASHWOOD ST
SAIL AVE
ANCHOR A VE
SAIL AVE
ST. JAMES AVE ST. JAMES AVE
BOURBON S T TUSTIN ST
ORANGE OLIVE RD
TORRES ST
CA NA L ST
SANTA ANA CANYON RD
SANTA ANA CANYON RD
PERALTA HILLS DR
VALLEY GATE DR
N
O
H
L
CANYO
N
RD
EMBERWOOD LN
OLIVE B RA NCH WA Y
MOU
NTAIN
GLEN RD
FERNHILL LN
RIDGE GATE RDNOHL RA NCH RD
NOHL RA NCH RD
NOHL CA NY ON RD
SA
NTIAG
O
BLV
D
SANTIA GO B LVD
VISTA CANYON RD
ZENITH POINT RD
ORANGE VIEW LN
HE IM AVE
VILLAREAL DR
BAILEY S T
AMOS S T
VILLAREAL DR
FEA THER HILL DRALTURA AV E SANTIAGO
BLVD
VILLAREAL DR
STONE PINE RD
VIL LA VISTAW
AY
BRYNMAR LN
MEATS AVE
MOUNTAIN V IEW CIR
MORI LN
AGATE STRIDING WAY
DIA MOND ST
MEATS AVE
DODSON WA Y
MORI LN
OPAL A VEDIAM
OND
ST
HIGHLAND S T
TAFT AVETAFT AVE
CA RDINAL CIR
MORN
IN
G
SID
E
ST
FIRESIDE S T
HILLS IDE AVE
PATRICK DR
BISHOP CIR
LAKESIDE A VE
MORNINGSIDE ST
FIRESIDE S T
FERN ST
BROOK SIDE AVE
PARKSIDE A VE M
O
RNING
STAR
C
IR
SANTIA GO B LVD
CHES TNUT A VE
CLINTON ST
MILFORD ST
MORNINGSIDE ST
CHES TNUT A VE
HA RT ST
ATHENS A VE
ATHENS A VE
NOBLE ST
ORAN GE GROVE AVE
GLENROSE DR
WRIGHTW OOD DR
RICK S T
EDDINGTON DR
LA NAE CIR
HE ATHERSTONE DR
DE L VALLE A VE
WALNUT AV E
EUCLID AV E
EUCLID AV E
SILVERLEA F AV E
SILVERLEA F AV E
ESPLANADE ST
SYCAMORE AVE
SWIDLER ST
EARLHAM ST
PALM AVE
PALM AVE
BLACKTHORN LN
GLENROSE ST
WRIGHTW OOD S T
SPRING ST
VINE AVE
VINE ST
CITRUS ST
ENTERPRIS E ST
COLLINS AVE
COLLINS AVE
OLIVE S T
GLASS ELL ST
WILSON AV E
HOOVE R A VE
ELIZA BETH DR
CE NTER ST
MONROE AV E
LOCUST A VE
CE NTER ST
QUINCY AVE
OLD ORCHARD LN
COLLINS AVE
GARDNER DR
QUINCY AVE
SHATTUCK PLSHATTUCK PL
SHATTUCK PL
CA LIFORNIA ST
CA MBRIDGE ST
CA RLE TON AVE
MONROE AV E
SACRAMENTO ST
BRISTOL LNBRISTOL LN
FLETCHER AVE
HE ARTHSIDE S TBEECHWOOD ST
RE DW OOD A VE
DE NIS E AVE
CLINTON ST
VILLA VISTA W AY
VILLA VISTA W AY
PAM
ICIR
PAM I CIR
P
AM
ICIR
EL SERENO DR
PA
M
ICIR
BRECKENRIDGE ST
RIDING WAY
MAIN ST
GROVE AVE
CA MBRIDGE ST
CA NDLEW OOD A VE
GREENGROVE ST
LINCOLN S T
NORDIC PL
CA NDLEW OOD A VE
SERRANO AVE
STAR PINE RD
SKYVIEWDR
PEACO CK L N
FLOW ER WOOD AVE
DO
GW
O
OD
ST
DEERW
O
O
D
ST
BAKER HILL RD
SAGE WOOD ST
SKYLARK
PL
CANYON VIEW AVE
CANYON VIEW AVE
SAN LUIS DR
BLACKBER
RY
COVE
NE WPORT BLVD
NE WPORT BLVD
TEA L LN
GO
LDENSPUR
W
AY
HIDDEN CANYO
N
WINDY POINTE
CRIOLLO
CIR
PINTOWAY
CLAR
ID
G
EDR
CARLISLE
PL
QUAIL LN
BARON CT
FERN ST
ELMWOOD STATHENS A VE
PRADO WOODS DR
SACRAMENTO ST
PRADO CIRTRENTON AVE
RE NA ISSANCE
TRENTON AVE
HA RDING S T
VANOWE N A VE
KATHLE EN LN
VANOWE N A VE
WANDA RD
KATELLA AV E VILLA PARK RD
COVINGTON CIR
BEARDSLEY CIR
HA RT ST
WILSON AV E
WILSON AV E
ADAMS AVE
HA STINGS DRPR
O
VID
EN
C
E
D
R
ADAMS AVE DOROTHY CIR
ABERDEEN LN
QUINCY AVE
QUINCY AVE
TACOMA CIR
JACKSON AVE
BECKLEY CIRMONROE AV E
HIGHLAND S T FITSCHEN RANCH RD
LOCUST A VE
TUSTIN ST
HA NDY S T
HA RT ST
JACARANDA AV E
CLINTON ST
COLLINS AVE COLLINS AVE
BARKLEY A VE
BARKLEY A VE
LOMITA AVE
HA RT ST
LOMITA AVE
OAKMONT A VE
MAYFAIR AVE
VICTORIA DR RUSS ELL DR SHIRLE Y DR
HIGHLAND S T
MAYFAIR AVE
MAYFAIR AVE
CLINTON ST
HA NDY S T
ELMWOOD ST
ROSE AV E
ROSE AV E
HA MILTON A VE
HA RT ST
FERN ST
HA NDY S T
WAYFIELD ST
OAK S T
SYCAMORE AVE
PALM AVE
PALM AVE
VINE AVE
MILFORD RD
DA NA AVE
McPHERSON RD
PEARL AVE
FIRST ST
MALENA ST
YORBA S T
YORBA S T
FAIRMONT WA Y
GARNET AVE
SEBA A VE
ROMELLE A VE
TUSTIN ST
EXETER PL
STE ARNS DR
ROSALIND DR
STE ARNS AVE
LORETTA DR
JAMES ST
ALMOND AVE
WASHINGTON AV E
WASHINGTON AV E
DUNAS S T
OLYMPIA WAY
SHASTA ST
THOMA S ST
PALMYRA A VE
ROBERTA DR
JAMES ST
RUTH PL
JORDAN AV E
WOODLA ND S T
HE WES ST
ROMELLE A VE
DUNAS RD
EARLHAM ST
PALOMA R W AY
FAIRHAVE N AVE
FAIRHAVE N AVE
CHARTER OA K DR
RICK S T
LA NAE CIR
LACONIA DR
CA THERINE CIR
ANTONIO CIR
CHEY ENNE ST
SONORA CIR
STE TSON LN
FE R NANDO
CIR
CERRO VILL A DR
MONTE
VISTACIR
SMOKE TREE CIR
EL RITO DR
RA
M
A
S
T
ROLLING GREEN LN
EL MORO WAY
ROSENAU DR
SUMMITRIDGE LN
QUEENS GATE WAY
TRITT CIR
RAM
A
ST
ROSENAU CIR
JOS HUA TREE CIR
GREEN CLOVER CIR
VALLEY DRROCKRIDGE PL
WESTRIDGE DR
VILLA DRCERRO
VILLA DR
VALLEY DR
HILLCREST AV ECOLONY GROVE LN
HILLCREST CIR
VERDE LOMA S CIR
TAFT AVE
COLONY CIR
AMATE CIR
BIXBY CIR
WILDWOOD WAYPLATANAL DR
BROOK LNPERALTA WAY
NOHL RA NCH RD
PERALTA HILLS DR
PERALTA
W
A
Y
CAVENDISH LN
RURAL RIDGE CIR
ABERDEEN ST
MEATS AVE
CA MDE N S T
WESTON ST
SOMERTON AV E
ROXBURY ST
WOODB INE RD
ASHFORD AVE
CORNWAL L AVE WHITEHALL ST
SPRINGFIELD ST
MEREDITH ST
SURREY ST
LEEDS AVEASHFORD A VE
KENT S T
BENTLE Y ST
ALDERLY LN
FOUNTAIN ARBOR DR
MERIDIA N S T
CROSSGA TE ST
WESTRIDGE CIR
WESTRIDGE RD CA LLE CANADA
TORREY PINES CIR
OAKGROVE CIR
WESTRIDGE RD
CALLEPRINCIPA
P
ASEO
BANDERA
AVEN
ID
A
FAR
O
RURAL RIDGE DR CALLE D ECASAS
CA RME N CIR
WESTRIDGE CIR
LOOP TRL
NOHL RA NCH RD AVENIDA LA VIDA
INDIAN TRL
INDIAN WE LLS CT
PROSPECTOR CIR
TRAPPER
TRL
PASEO CARMEL SE TTLER CT
SCO
U
T
TR
L
COW BOY CIR
RIV ER VALLEY TRL
FRONTIER CT
CA NNON S T
PATHFINDER TRLSCOUT TRL
BIG SK Y LN
STONEHAVEN DR
VERSAILLE CTSANMIGUEL DR
SANMIGUELDR
A
UB
RE
Y
C
IR PORTOFIRAW AY
M
E
S
A
D
R
VALLEY DR
CA NNON S T
SAN MIGUEL DR
CA RV ER LN
H
ID
D
EN
VALLE
Y
CIR
CANYONDR
WISTERIA LNESTATES DRHU
N
TIN
G
C
IR
LOMA ST
AZALEA
DR
CANYON DR
LAS
FLORES
CIR
GOLDENROD LNVILLA ISLE CIR
VILLA ISLE DR
MESA DR
CANNON ST
KATAW
PA
C
IR
CRES TVIE W CIR
SMOKEY AVE
EVERGLA DES CIR
ISLE ROYA LE CIR
RIDGEVIEW
RD
CRESTVIEW CIR
CA NY ON PARK CIR
CARPENTER CIR
BRYCE AVE
CRATERLAKEAVE
M
T.M
cKIN
LEY
BLVD
CRATER LAK E AVEC
ANNO
N
ST
LEATR
IC
E
D
R
MOUNTAIN AVE
MABURY AVETAFT AVE LARSON CIR
MABURY AVE
HILLS IDE AVE
MODOC ST
LAKESIDE A VE
JUANENO A VE
BROOK SIDE AVE
LEXINGTON AV E
YUROK ST
CHUMASH S T
MODOC ST
PALA PL
SHOSHONE AVE
CANN
O
N
ST
FRANK LN
GRAY LN
SARATOGA ST
SAN JUAN DR
WOODV IEW CIR
RICHARD ST
HILTON LN
M
ORADA
D
R
PALO LOMA PL
LINDA V ISTA ST
AVILA PL
CA NNON S T
LOS ALTOS PL
MEADS AVE
RA NCHO S ANTIA GO B LVD
MEADS AVE
COSTELLO P L
CLIFFWAY D R
CLIFFWAY DR
RICHARD ST
CREE KSIDE AV E
AVENIDAPALMAR CANNONST
RE NE E ST
RY ALS LN
CE NTER ST
CADBURYDR
BOND AVE
BIRDCAGE CT
DESERT
PE
AC
H
CT
BOTTLE BRUSH DR
PAINTB RUS H DR
CHAP MAN AVE
RIDGEVIEW DR
JOA N D ARC CIR
NORMANDIE CIR
WEST VIEW DR
MOUNTAIN V IEW CTEAGLE S POINT
AMAPOLA AVE
LAKEVIEW T RL
CREEKV
IEW
DR
LEMON H ILL TRL
H O RSES HOERD
TU
R
NABO
UT
RD
SADDLEBACK DR
CAMBRIAC IR
CHAP MAN AVE
W RANGLER CIR
C
ALLE
G
R
AN
D
E
LACUMBREDR
CALLE
A
LTA
DE EP SPRING RD
LA CUMB RE DR
DIA
NE
DR
WINDE S DR
HUNTERS WAY
SANDBERG LN
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
LOLITA STKENNYMEAD ST
WILDERNE SS AV E MUS TANG AVEFRANK ST
RA NDALL S T STA LLION STORANGE P ARK BLVD
MEADS AVE
SUFFOLK CIR
ARABIAN AV E
KEN N YMEADST
ACRE PL
COYOTE LN
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
RIDGELINER
D
AMAPOL A AVE
AM APOLA AVE
SERRANO AV E
SERRANO AV E
LAKE MEA D CIR
H
IDDENOAKS
LN
WI
NDESDR
LEWIS DR
KIMBARK LN
WINDE S DR
NOHL RA NCH RD
BRIGHTON LN HILLS IDE LN
RIDGEWOOD CT CA NY ON RIM RD
GOLDEN SK Y LN ANAHEIM HILLS RD
MORNINGVIEWDR
COVERED WA GON TRL CA NY ON CT
SUMMIT CT
SILVERSPUR TRL
NUGGET CT
NOHL RA NCH RDOVERLAND CIR
MONTE FINO LN
IRONHORSE LN
LANDE RA LN
STA GE COA CH RD
LANGTRE E LN
BUTTERFIELD LN
PALOMINO LN HA CK AMORE LN TOURMALINE CT QUARTZ LN
STIL LWATER LN
QUEENS DR CA MINO GRANDE
RUBY LN
GARNET CIR
AMETHY ST LN
LO
NESTAR
LN
OAKV IEW LNSAPPHIRE LN
ONYX LN SADDLEBACK LNTWINPE AK CIR
SHANADA CT
JACARANDA WA Y
CORAL
CIR
AMBERLNSA
PPHIRE LN
LOOK OUT L N
PERIDOT PL
TWIN
PEAK
CIR
WALNUT CANYON
SHADY VALLEY
LN
FAIRWA Y LNSTONEBR IDGE LN
GOLF GLE N DR
RIDGE GLEN RD
FOLK DALE LN
VIA FRE SCO
MICHIGAN CIR
RIDGE VIEW RD
KENTUCKY AVE
SCRIP PS CIR
LOYOLA DR
RUTGERS DRLEHIGH DR
PASEO EL GRE COCA MINO GRANDE
KENTUCKY AVE
SWARTHMORE DR
VASSA R CIR
WILLIAMS CIRPURDUE CIR
PASEO DIEGO
JOHNSTOWN CIRFORDHAM CIR
SWARTHMORE DR
PRINCETON A VE
SERRANO AV EHA RV ARD CIR
EDINB ORO CIR GRINNE LL ST
BUCK NE LL CIR GEORGETOWN CIR
LEAFWOOD DRAMHERST CIR
QUINCY CIR
PINE CANYON CIR
RIMW OOD DR
NOHL RA NCH RD
CA RNEGIE AV E
RIMWOOD DR
ASPEN WO OD CIRSERRANO AV E
TAMA RIS K DR
S
MOKEWOOD
CIR
PEGA SUS ST
MARENGO DR
LEAFWOOD DR
BU RLWOOD DR
AV
ENIDA
DE
SANTIAGO
SANTIA GO P REMIER
IRV INE PARK RD
JAMBOREE RD
HEATHER VIEW LN
JAMBOREE RD
FRONTERA ST
SWEETWATER ST
DE ERFIELD S T
BLUEROCK ST
TORRENS S T
BAINBRIDGE A VE
ALDERDA LE AVE
CLA YTOR CIR
HOLTWOOD AVE
ALDERDA LE CIR
RE DROCK ST
ELKSTONE AVE
ADDINGTON DR
SAGA MORE ST
BLUE GUM ST
WHITE S TAR A VE KRAEMER BLV D
LA PALMA AVEWHITE S TAR A VE
ARMANDO ST
LA PALMA AVE
LA PALMA AVE
LA MESA A VE
RE DW OOD DR
RE DW OOD DR
TAORMINA DR
CA ROUSEL PL
ROYAL PL
SYCAMORE STSYCAMORE ST VIA PISA
SYCAMORE ST
PLANTA TION PL
RE DW OOD P L JACKSON AVE
RE DW OOD DR
RE DW OOD DR
CA ROUSEL ST
ROYAL PL
BANGOR W AY
PLANTA TION PL
CA RNIVA L AVE CA RNIVA L AVE
RIO VISTA STOLYMPIA PL NORMANDY PL
CHANTILLY STTOWER PL
UNDERHILL AVELONDON PL
BLANCHA RD A VE MARDI GRAS AV E
STA TE COLLEGE BLVD
TENNYSON AVESEVILLE A VE
NE W AVE
CA ROLYN WAY
WESTPORT DR
WESTPORT CIR
HILDA CIR
WESTPORT DR
PURITAN LN PURITAN DR
PURITAN PL
PURITAN CIR
COLT S T SUNK IST S T
PRISCILLA WAY DUSTIN P
L
RE SEDA ST CITADEL LNPLYMOUTH PL PEREGRINE S T
MANCOS AV EHILDA CT
VIRGINIA AV EVIRGINIA AV E
VIRGINIA AV E VIRGINIA AV E
ALDEN PLALDEN AVE ALDEN AVEVIRGINIA PL
ALDEN PL
COLT S T
ALDEN PL
RE SEDA PL STA NDISH A VE
JAMBOLAYA ST
MATILDA S T
STA NDISH A VE
STA NDISH A VERE SEDA ST
PEREGRINE S T
SOUTH S T
SOUTH S T
DIA NA DR
DIA NA AVE
DIA NA AVE
PRISCILLA STPLYMOUTH PL
VALE AV E
BETHE L DR VERDE AVE
STE HLE Y ST
VERDE AVEOAKS TONE WAY
VIKING AV E
VIKING AV E
PHYLLIS CIR
JAMES ON ST
NORSE CIR
RA NDY A VE
RIO VISTA ST
NA PA PL HILDA S TNORDICA LN
CHANTILLY STHILDA P L
OLMSTEAD WA YSTA TE COLLEGE BLVD HILDA P L
BURNTWOOD AVE
NURA PL
GLAMUS AV ESUNK IST S T
NURA AV E
DUNE ST
RE SEDA ST AMES CIR
AMES AV ESTONE CIR
NY ON PL NY ON AVE
MARJAN ST
VERMONT AVE
CA RDIFF S T
VERMONT AVE VERMONT AVE
VERMONT AVE
SUGARWOOD LN
OSHKOSH AVENORDICA S T
OSHKOSH AVEOSHKOSH CIR OSHKOSH AVE
FIGWOOD LN
HILDA S TCE DA RW OOD LN
LIZBE TH CTBLACKWOOD LN SIET PLPEARWOOD LNFIRWOOD LN
LIZBE TH AV E LIZBE TH AV ELIZBE TH AV E LIZBE TH AV E
AMBRIDGE S TSADDLEWOOD LNMINTWOOD LN CHAUCER ST PEREGRINE P L
WAGNER AV E
WAGNER AV E
MAVERICK AV E
SIET PL
LAURE LWOOD LN
MAVERICK AV EAMBRIDGE S T CLA RE NCE ST
NORM PLTRYON A VE
CORTNEY W AY
NORMAN PL NORM PL
STRONG PL
MAUERHA N PL STRONG PLSTA TE COLLEGE BLVD
SUNK IST S T
ALMONT AVE
BALL RD
LEWIS ST
KATELLA AV E
ROYAL OAK RD
SPRING RD CONSTA NTINE RD
AVENIDA FELIPE
BEAUTY DR VISTA DEL RIOLAKEVIEW
AVE
HA DRIANS CRESAVENIDA FELIPEORANGE HILL LN
PASEO BALB OASPR ING HILLDR
AVENIDA BERNARDO
MARGARITA AVE
SHADY GLE N LN
VISTA DEL AMIGO FRANCISCO P LCRES CE NT DR
CA LLE DIAZ
FIRENZE CRESMARGARITA AVE
PASEO DE LEONGLEN ARBOR LN
HE RME S RD
CHRISALTA W AY LEANDRO ST
SOLOMON DR
CA LLE GAM ASILVERBROOK DR LAPAZ ST
TIBE R DR
FERN HAVE N LN PASEO DE SOTO
VISTA DEL DIASMOKE RIDGE TER
CE RRO VIST
A DR
AVENIDA BE RNARDO HILLCREST ST
MARSHA CIR
VISTA
DEL CANON
HILLCREST CIR ANAHEIM HILLS RD
CA MINO PIZON
ARMSTRONG CIR
BOONE CIR
COLUMBUS WAY
PARK RIM CIR
VIA
D
E
R
O
SA
CREE KSIDE LN
RUTGERS CIR
SERRANO AV E
PARK LN
VIRGINIA AV E
KEEGAN WAY
GROVE MONT ST KNOLL L AKE
GROVE MONT ST
GROVE MONT ST
FORE ST LA KEVIEW LAK ELINCOLN A VE
TOWNLEY ST
EASTWOOD AVE SHADOW LA KEHA THAWA Y ST PARK LN
MARTY LN CHERRY ST
ASPEN STTRASK AVE LYON ST
BUFFALO A VE AVALON A VELYON STAVALON A VE
SPURGEON ST
AVALON A VE MANTLE S T RICHMOND ST
TWE NTY-SECOND STEDNA DR
TWE NTY-SECOND STPORTOLA A VE CA MINO AVELINW OOD A VE
CA TALINA A VEALONA ST
MILLWOOD STEASTWOOD ST
G
LEN
VIEW
PL
CONCORD S T
EASTSIDE AV E
AVALON A VE
MARDE LL AVE
EARLHAM ST
ORANGE
VIEW
LN
RIDGEWOOD ST
WHITTIER ST
BORTZ ST
POLARIS RD
THOR RD
JUMPER RD
SATURN RD
MISSILE LN
ATLA S DR
WAKEFIELD AV E
PAGEANT DR
SUN
FLO
W
ER
CIR
HA
RVEST
LN
SEDONA DR
O
L
D
C
HAPM
AN
AVE
LOMITA AVE
COUNTRY HOLLOW
CORO DE ORO DR
TRAILS E ND LN
CHAP MAN AVE
CHAP MAN AVE
NE WPORT BLVD
WHITE OAK RDG
EQUESTRIAN DR
DA PPLE CIR
CAMBRIA CIR
CA LICO TRL
BISCAYNEWAY
FORT RD
SANTA MARIA ST
W
ILD
HORSECIR
MEADS AVE
ORANGE P ARK BLVD
WILLOW W OOD CIR
NA VARRO PL
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
VALLEY FORGE DR
CA TALINA S T
GLEN ALBY N LN
EQUESTRIAN LN
BOND AVE
CHURCH S T
CHURCH S T
EL SALVA DOR AVE
NOBLE ST
ESPLANADE ST
CONSTITUTION AVE
HE WES ST
VIA LA PALOMA
CA SSELLE AVE
DUNAS RD
LA VETA AVE
OLYMPIA WAY
KENSINGTON RD
WELLINGTON RD
EXETER PL
CRAIG DR
BELVEDERE RD
DUTCH A VE
HE MPSTEAD RD
BARBARA W AY
TREVOR ST
WINFIELD A VE
PLANTA TION PL
ARMANDO ST
VIA TRIE STE
VIA TARANTO
VIA BRUNO
VIA MARSA LA
VIA TRIE STE
VIA MARCO
COTTONWOOD ST
EDGEWA TE R S T
SANDBAR CIR
RIV ER MIST CIR
COTTONWOOD ST
RIVERVIEW AVE
WHITE S HORES DR
PINEWOOD ST
COTTONWOOD ST
MEADOWB ROOK AVE
KRAEMER PL
SANTA ANITA ST
SAN ALTO AV E
SAN ALANO AVE
JEANINE DR
BETH S T
BARBARA W AY
ROBBINS CT
ASHBURY PL
VIA ROMA
VIA REMO
VIA REMO
SPRUCE WOOD AVE
ORANGE S T
GLASS ELL ST
TULAROS A AVE
MORELAND DR
OLD CAMP RD
CROSS CREEK RD
LA VETA AV E
SANTA ANA CANYON RD
CIRCLE HAVEN RD
BELLEZA LN CA LLE DANA
STRADA P L
C
ER
RO
VISTA
W
AY
PERALTA HILLS DR
OAK HILL DR
SPLIT RA IL LN
FORE ST GLEN RD
BRADBURY CT
ORANGE A CRE S DR
NOHL RA NCH RD
GENTRY LN
FAIRFIELD ST
EVENING VIEW RD
ROLLING HILLS PL
TISB URY CT
PRAIRIE PL
NA NTUCKET LN
ANDOVER DR
STA NDISH A VE
HE MPSTEAD RD
BUTLER ST
DUNTON AVE
DUNTON AVE
LINCOLN A VE
ST. JAMES AVE
MAIN ST
GAFF S T
BUOY AV E
GALLEY ST
GAFF S T
NORTHUMBERLAND RD
SANTIAGO BLVD
SOMERSE T S T
SOMERTON AVE
SHELTON AVE
TRINITY LN
MAPLEWOOD ST
FEA THERHILL DR
MOCKINGBIRD PL
WARBLER PL
HA RT ST
RAGAN
C
IR
WILDWOOD CIR
WILDWOOD WAY
OMEGA AVE
OMEGA AVE
SIMPSON CIR
TALT AVE
ALTE NA WAY
HILDA S T
ALKI PL
ALKI ST
WHIDB Y LN
WHIDB Y LN
HA RRIS CT
TRENTON AVE
HIGHLAND S T
LAKES IDE AVE
LITTLE JOHN WAY
HA NDY S T
VANOWE N A VE
FREDRICK DR
OAK LN
WILDERNE SS AV E
ECKHOFF ST
PRIVATE STREET
SINCLA IR S T
HOOVE R A VE
HA RDING S TLAURE L DR
WANDA RD
OAKMONT A VE
JACARANDA AV E
HE LENA CIR
WILSON AV E
MONTA NA CIR
GLORIA CIR
POTTE R CIR
RA DE C CT
MARION WAY
CE RRITOS DR
GLEN ALBY N LN
ALPINE ST
LOMITA AVE
GRAND ST
OAKMONT A VE
MAYFAIR AVE
ROSE AV E
ORANGE S T
GRAND ST
EVERETT P L
HA RW OOD S T
JEFFE RS ON AVE
LYNN DR
CA LIFORNIA ST
BARKLEY A VE
LINCOLN S T
EVERETT P L
ORANGE GROVE AVE
HE RITAGE PL
LINCOLN S T
WALNUT AV E
ORANGE GROVE AVE
SACRAMENTO ST
MADISON AV E
CLINTON ST
APPALOOS A TRL
EUCA LYPTUS TRL
HIGHBROOK RD
HILLS GATE RD
JE T
TY
D
R
HA LYARD LNBEAUXWOOD ST
STA Y CT SPINNAKER ST
SPIN
N
A
KE
R
S
T
LEWIS STANCHOR S T
SPINNAKER ST
VERU STGRANT P L
TOWN CE NTRE PL
RA MPART S T
FIR ST
POPLA R S T
STE VENS ST
BEVERLY DR
FLOWER ST
POPLAR
ST
BEVERLY DR
FAIRMONT ST
CITRUS ST
MAIN ST
HA RW OOD S T
CA LIFORNIA ST
SHAFFER ST
LAEL DR
MAPLE AV E
CLE VELAND ST
MAPLEWOOD PL
MONTE RE Y RD
CE NTURY DR
LINCOLN S T
MT. VE RNON AVE
MARTHA AV E
DA NA AVE
WAYFIELD CIR
SYCAMORE AVE
WAYFIELD ST
MT. VERNON AVE
MARTHA AV E
LE MAY CT
PARK LN
SYCAMORE AVE
SPRING ST
KATHLE EN LN
MAPLE AV E
CE NTER ST
KILLINGSW ORTH AV E
PROSPE CT ST
SHASTA ST
HE WES ST
EARLHAM ST
DUNAS S T
MAPLE AV E
THOMA S ST
RA NCHO S ANTIA GO B LVD
AVENIDA PA LMAR
CHRISTINE ST
SYCAMORE AVE
THORA S T
WHEATGRASS DR
CO
BBLESTO
N
E
DR
MORNINGLORY W AY
ELK GLE N L N
GLEN OA K LN
BAYPORT S T
ADRIAN ST
LAMPSON A VE
LAUX CIR
LAUX CIR
HE ATHER CIR
CHAPMAN AVE
PROVIDENCE AV E
BUSH ST
McCOY RD
PAUL RD
PEPPE R S T
CITRUS ST
MARIETTA A VE
CLA RK ST
KELLY AV E
PINE ST
ORANGE S T
GRAND ST
RIV ER AVE
WAVERLY S T
GARDNER ST VAN BIBBE R AVE
WASHINGTON AV E
WASHINGTON AV E
WAYFIELD ST
FAIRWA Y DR
TERI LNJENNIFE R L N
DOROTHY DR
ROSALIND DR
WASHINGTON AV E
WHEELER PL
MALENA DR
KATHLE EN LN
ROBERTA DR
WHEELER ST
CE NTURY AVE
SERANADO S T
SWIDLER PL
DOROTHY DR
PROSPE CT ST
WASHINGTON AV E
NORWOOD S T
ALMOND AVE
LO
N
G
SPUR
LN
RAVEN
CT
OUTRIDER
ST
CA NY ON VIEW AVE
PRESIDIO W AY
M
ULBERRY
ST
TIMBERLAND
AVE
SANTA CRUZ AVE
RA IN TREE RD
AS
PEN
ST
SALINAS CT
INDIAN HILLS RD
IRONWOOD AVE
ANNE TTE CIR AUDREY CIR
ARLETTA CIR
JETTY ST
ADRIA N CIR
DUNKLEE AVE
ASPENWOOD AV E
AUDREY CIR
BLUE SPRUCE AVE
ANNE TTE CIR
PARK VINE S T
FONDREN ST
EL PRADO A VE
PARK HYDE ST
LEWIS ST
FOUNDREN ST
LARAMORE LN
LORI LN
McEVOY LN
RIV ER LN
SHARON RD
EL RANCHO AVE
FERNWOOD DR
WESTWOOD AVE
FARMERS DR
MAINPLACE DR
FAIRMONT ST
JONQUIL RD
CLE MENSEN AVE
JESS EE DR PARK LNPARK LN
PARK LN
EASTWOOD AVE
KEEGAN WAY
OLD GRAND ST
JOA NA DR
LINW OOD S T
LINW OOD S T
EASTSIDE ST
WRIGHT S T
CONCORD S T
LYON ST
FORE ST LA KE
FAIRWA Y DR
WAVERLY S T
ROSWELL S T
RICHMOND ST RIDGEWOOD ST
KEMPER AV E
DA YNA ST
YOUNG CIR
LA VETA AV E
TULAROS A AVE
ROSEWOOD AV E
ALBION LN
NUBIA N LN
GREENGROVE ST
WAYFIELD ST
KIRKWOOD AVE
PONDEROS A ST
CA LVO DR
PONDEROS A ST
JOA NA DR
LOWRY ST
FAIRMONT WA Y
BURDIE LN
LORETTA DR
WHEELER PL
MALENA DR
ELGIN PL
ARLINGTON RD
HA RTFORD RDCOATE RD
FLINT DR
FIELDSTONE DR
STE ARNS DR
STE ARNS DR
DA RME L PL
KIRKWOOD AVE
OLYMPIA WAY
SHASTA WAY SHASTA WAYDIX ON AVE
AUSTIN AV E AUSTIN AV E
TILDEN AVE
CA SSELLE AVE
SWIDLER PL
SWIDLER PL
CE DA RW OOD S T
STE ARNS DR
WINTHROPE ST
KIRKWOOD AVE
HA VENWOOD CIR
KIRKWOOD AVE
FERNWOOD AVE
LARKSTONE AV E
NE WHAVEN DR
SCHUG ST
FERNWOOD AVE
SHAD
YFORESTLN
WATERFORD S T
RIV ERDA LE AVE
VALLEY FORGE RD
MERRIMA C DR
FLINTLOCK WA Y
FINCH ST
ADDINGTON CIR
MAL CT
SANTA ANA CANYON RD
ROGUE DR
COUNTRY CANYON RD
R
U
STIC
G
ATE
WA
Y
WYNGATE RD
CE DA RHAV EN WAY
LAMP POST WAY
RIDGE GATE RD
CHALICE LNFAIRFIELD ST
MEATS AVE
RE GENCY AV E
FAIRLEE CT
GATEWOOD LN
HONEYWOOD LN
ROCKRIDGE PL
WESTWAY A VE
DUNTON AVE
DUNBAR ST
DE LTA S T
WHITECAP AVE
VALLEY GLEN LN
WICKHAM AVE
ROCHE STE R DR
TENDERROW PL CHEV INGTON CT
HUNSFORD DR
AUBURN ST
VIA ESCOLA
HILLS BOROUGH AVE
AMERICAN WAY S T
WOODS TOCK AVE
BROOK SIDE AVE
HA RT ST
HILLS IDE AVE
ARDE N V ILLA DR
HUMMINGB IRD CIR
BRILEY WA Y
MARIPOSA DR
MENDOCINO CIR
FLINTRIDGE DR
CA RME L DR
VILLA LN
BALLIET DR
WATERTON AVE
DRES SAGE ST
CLY DE SDALE AV E
WHITE A LDE R CIR
HE IM AVE
PRADO WOODS DR
WESTWOOD DR
STRATFORD CIR
STE RLING AVE
CA MDE N CIR
VIA BR AVO
JOCOTAL A VE
DOUGLASS RD
BRENNA LN
HOOVE R A VE
COOLIDGE AVE
GARFIELD AVE
SACRAMENTO ST
JODI ST
MILFORD ST
QUINCY AVE
MONROE AV E
JACKSON AVE
MALLARD ST
MORGAN ST
PORTSMOUTH CIR
WELLINGTON CIR
FREDRICK DR
ALBANY CIR
MORROW CIR
CE DA RHILL CIR
SHERWOOD CIR
HUNTINGTON CIR
VIA BRAVO
SQUIRESC
IR
PHELAN DR
OLD LAMPLIGHTER LN
CORAL TRE E CIR
EDGEWOOD AV E
PARK VILLA PL
PARK VILLA LN
DURFEE LN
PARK VILLA CIR
SEQUOIA AVE
BRADEN CT
CRES CE NT DR
LOMITA AVE
BARKLEY A VE
BIRCHWOOD RD
RA NCHROAD DR
ADR
IAN
ST
WINDGAP DR
ARBOR WAY
YORKSHIRE P L
HA THAWA Y DRCA NFIELD PL
COPPERFIELD RD
MINE CA NY ON RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
BALBOA AVE
NE WPORT AVE
DEERSHIRE CT
LOREDO AV E
FINCH ST
CHANTILLY ST
CINDA ST
JEANINE ST
WESTGATE DR
PURITAN PL
STE HLE Y ST
LINCOLN A VE
LINCOLN A VE JEANINE CIR
ALICE WAY
COLLYER LN
BELLAMY A VE
HE MPSTEAD RD
KEOK UK ST
YORKTOW
NCIR
BUNK ER HIL L
NA UTICAL ST
ACACIA AVE
HIGHLAND S T
HE ATHER CIR
DUNKLEE AVE
GRAND AVE
GROVE MONT ST
LONDONDERRY LN
CHIDDINGSTONE LN
LOCHLEVEN LN
GATESFORD LN
GLASTONBURY LN
WEDGEW OOD LN
PENZA NCE LN
ROSED ALE LN
COTS WOLDS LN
CA RNEGIE LN
CHARDONNAY LN
VIRAGE S T
LIV EOAK DR
BRIARCREST LN
CED AR CREEK WAY
APPLETREE LN
KNOLLWOOD DR
FIELDCREST LN
AUTUMNHILL WAY
OAK TREE LN
SWEETWATER LN
BRIARWOOD RD
ELDERWOOD AVE
WHITEOAK
RDG
JONQUIL RD
PARK LN
RIV ERSIDE RD
RIV ERSIDE DR
NORTH
PARK
BLVD
H
ELIO
TRO
P
E
D
R
BENTO
N
W
Y
BUFFALO A V
SANTA CL ARA AV SANTA CL ARA AV
BUFFALO S T
O
LIVE
LN
LO
W
E
LL
LN
TOWNER
ST
TO
W
NER
ST
FR
EEM
AN
ST
O
LOV
E
ST
W
E
STW
O
OD
AV
RO
SEW
O
OD
AV
BAKER ST
22ND ST
MARION WY
LOUIS ST
W
ESTW
O
O
D
AV
R
OSEW
O
O
D
AV
RIVIERA DR
RIVER LN
BAKER ST
SHARON RD
LOWELL LNTOWNER LN
GREENBRIER
HE SPERIAN ST
SHARON
RIV ER LN
ALONA S T
FOREST
AV PARK LN
PARK LN
ELM ST
HE SPRIAN ST
PACIFIC AV
SPRUCE STFORE ST A V
RIV IERA DR
MARION WY
ALONA ST
SANTA CLA RA AV
POPLA R S T HE SPERIAN ST
EML ST
POPLA R S TPACIFIC AVSPRUCE STFORE ST A VTAMY LN
TWE NTY-SECOND ST
CA NDIS A VEJODY A VE
BONNIE BRAE
HELIOTROPE DR
ACACIA PL
SUNDERLAND ST
TIM
BERLINE
ST
M
ARYS
CIR
LN
TIMBERLIN LN
W
ILLO
W
G
LE
N
CIR
R
AVEN
SCR
O
FT
RD
N
O
R
FO
LD
D
R
CHANTIL L Y CIR
CASTL EROC K LN
SUNRISE LN
S
AINT
CLO
UD
LN
FOXRUN
RD
KINGS BRIDGE RD
COWANHEIGHTS
HIG
HCLIFF
DR
BRIER LN
COWAN CANYON CIR
RANGEVIEW
LAKECRESTCIR
O
VE
RHILLDR
DEERH
AVEN
D
R
COWAN HEIGHTS HIGHCLIFF DR
RANGEVIEW DR
DEERHILL DR
BRIGHTW OOD DR
CLEARVIEW L N
QUAIL
RUN
SIR
RINE
D
R
LA SIERRAPL
LAD ERA
SENDA
O
VE
RV
IEW
C
IR
LONGMONT PL
SHADYRIDGEDR
BRIER LN
TRAVETINE
PL
BOCA
CAN
YO
N
D
R
O
VER
H
ILLD
R OVERHILL
DR
MIRA
VISTA
DR
G
R
O
VE
OAKDR
COTTONTAIL DR
M
ARTIN
G
ALEPL
BRIGHTON
DR
W
EYM
O
U
N
T
PL
QUADRILLE
PL
HUNTSMAN
FURLONG
DR
BRIDLE PATHWY
PADDOCK LN
BRO
NC
O
C
IR
LEM
ONHEIGHTSDR
CHERRYHILL DR
MUMFORD
DR
EDGEVIEW
DR
GLENAIRE
DR
LIMETREE
DR
CH
ERRYHILLDR
YAR
M
O
U
TH
RD
CLOYDEN RD
ADDISON
RD
CORON EL RD
THORLEY
DR
APSLEYRD
PEACOCK HILL DR
BENNINGTON DR
ARROYO A V
CORONEL RD
SKYLIN
E
D
R
KIMBER WICKE DR
ROCKHURST AV
RIDGEW
AY
DR
BRO
ADVIEW
PL
HILLSBORD
RD
GR EE NBRIER RD
BRADCIFF CT
HYDEPARKDR
NEWPORT BLVD
PI N E CANYON
RD
OVERBROOK DR
CORALWOOD DR
HIGHT CREST CIR
HINTON W Y
SSHELLY
LN
HINTON WY
EL ROY DR
WILLIS LN
GREENWAL D LN
M
A
RTIN
LN
BARRETT LN
SAINTJUDE DR
DORIS WY
FISHER LN
BARRETT LN
FISCHBECK
RD
CA RME L WY
FAIRHAVE N EXT
SAYLOR TER
CRAW
FORD
C
ANYO
N
RD
CRAWFORD CANYONRD
CANYONTER
PONO
RAM
A
VIEW
PANO
RAMA PL
VIE
W
RIDG
E
D
R
ARTNELL E XT
P
AN
O
R
AM
A
PL
CIRCULAPANORAM A
BAJA
PONORAMA
VISTA
PANO
RA
M
A
CIRC U L A PANORAMA
M
EN
UD PANORAMA
MEDIA
PAN
O
RAM
A
BAJA
PO
NO
R
AM
A
LIBER
TY
W
Y
C
HIPW
O
O
D
S
T
LYNNW O OD AV
K
IN
G
VIEW
RD
CH
AR
M
AIN
E
LN
ARTNELL E XT
W
IN
N
W
O
OD
LN
FAIRHAVE N AV
FAIRHAVE N
MITTMAN LN
ROCKY RD
BARRETT LN
SAINT MA RY S DR
THOMASDR
AZU
SA
CIR
TAM
ARIS
K
D
R
DE EP WELL RD
SCOTT
PINOTO LN
STA NTON
LA
R
IAT LN
SAINTM
ARKS
DR BARRETTHILL CIR
LEMON CIR
LEMON
HILL
GATEW
AY
D
R
FOOTHILL BLVD
NE WHAVEN
CA BARET CT
EARLHAM
LASSEN DR
SANDH
URST
PL
MALTA ST
VALE AV
SPAULDING AV
SILVER ST
OAK RIDGE DR
HILLHAVEN DR
SANDHURST PL
SILVER ST
MAPLE WY
GIMBERT LN
OAK RIDGE DR
ETON PL
HILLHAV EN DR
SUSSEX P L
EMB UR Y DR
WHITNEY DR
RA INIE R DR
CRANBR OOK DR
OAK RIDGE DR
KOOTENAY DR
KOOTENAY DR
BOW P L
SUSSEX P L
DODGE AV
SANTA CLARA AV
ESPLANADE AV
ESPLANADE AV
ALLEGHENY DR
OAK RIDGE
SANTA C LARA AV
MT HOOD DR
BLU
D
R
ID
GE
DR
RA INE R DR
OLYMPIA WAY PALOMA R W AY
DA RME L PL
MT HOOD DR
PROSPE CT AV
RA INE R DR
MALENA DR
W HITNEY
FLINT
DR
LAURINDA W Y
MALENA DRWHELLER PL
LORETTA DR
ROSALIN DR
FLINT DR
FLINT DR
LAURIND
A
W
Y
LAURIND
A
W
Y
SANTA CLA RA AV
MEREDITH DR
EDDY DR
SANTA CLA RA AV
BRENT LN
LEAFWOOD LN
WHEELER PL
W
HE
ELER
PL
M
ALEN
A
D
R
MALENA DR
FAIRM
O
NT
W
Y
FAIRMONT WY
ETHELB EE WA Y
CA LVO DR
KEEGAN WY
GROVE MONT ST
MARSHALL LN ETHELB EE WY
YORBA S T
YORBA S T
RAINER DR
MARSHALL LN CA RROLL WY FAIRMONT WY
LINDA LN
LEAFWOOD LN
BRYCE PL
O
A
K
LN
DODGE AV DODGE AV
SMOKE TREE LN
GIGI DR
SA
INTJOHNPL
SAINTVINCENT PL
FOOTHILL B LVD
FOOTHILL BLVD LA LIMONAR RD
CA MBERA PL
BIM
INIDR
DORSETSHIRDLN
BRAD
C
LIFF
ARROYO
AV
SANTA CLA RA AV
LEAFWOOD LN
ALLEGHENY DR
ALLEGHENY DRALLEGHENY DR
MIRA LAGO PLN
COW
AN
HEIGHTSDR
OVERHILLDR
WHITESTONETER
HOLLY TREE LN
FOX SPRIN GS R D
LEMON
LEAF
ORANGEKNOLLDR
CONVENTRY PL
BRUNSW ICK WY
PEMBROKEDR
PAINTE D P ONY LN
MARCY DR
M
ARCYRANCH
RD
HOLIDAY L N
VILLA
R
O
SEDR
S
PRING
W
O
O
D
DR
M
IRIAM
PLN
PANOR AMAREST
BO
NITAHEIG
HTS
DR
C
O
TTO
N
W
O
O
D
DR
IRONWOOD LN
OLD FOOTHILL BLVD
KASSY DR
GREEN WILLOW CT
SHEPARD
W
Y NE WPORT AV
SANDHURST
SUSSEX P L
ESPLANADE PARK
FAIRWOOD LN
ALLGHENY DR
LASSEN DR
ALLEGHENY DR
GERSHON P L
BLUE RIDGE
C
R
ESTLINE
D
R
SHASTA WY
LASSEN DR
LASSEN WY
PROSPE CT AV
LASSEN DR
ETON PL
LAKE HIL L DR
TWINTREE CIR
SHERING HAM AVE
SHAFFER ST
CLE VELAND ST
WILSON AV
STRUCK AV
OAKM ONT AVE
W
AVER
LY
ST
LEMON ST
TAFT AVE
HIGHPOINT RD
G
YM
KA
NA
ST
GROVEWOOD LN
SYCAMORE GLEN DR
KIRKWO OD AV
FERNWOOD AVE
MORGAN ST MALLARD STADELE ST KATHLE EN ST
MALLARD STMORGAN ST
JACARANDA AV E
LOCUST A VE
JUNIPER AVE
PALO A LTO PL
MUIR DR
MUIR DR
O'DONNELL WA Y
SHAFFER STSHAFFER ST
CA SE STCA SE ST
MAIN ST
KATELLA AV E
BATAVIA ST
ORANGE S T
QUINCY AVE
GLASS ELL ST
LEMON ST
KATELLA AV E
ADAMS AVE
LINDA V ISTA ST
CA TALINA S T
NA VARRO PL
PORTSMOUTH CIR
VALENCIA DR
NA VARRO PL
PALO LOMA PL
VALENCIA DR
WILLIAMSB URG ST
ZIO
N
ST
C
ARLSBA
D
ST
LASSEN BL VD
SHENANDOAH AVE
TETON AVE
CROWN PARKWA Y
FAIRECLIFF DR
SKYLINE DR
P
AR
KHURST
DR
FO
XW
ORTH
DR
ANDOVER DR
RIDGEMONT CT
SANDSTONE CT
HILLG ROVE CT
ROCKHURST DR
ROCKHURST DR
RA MA ST
CLIFFWA Y DR
ENTERTAINMENT DR
VISTA POI NT DR
LAS P A LMAS CIR
POPLA R S T
WILKEN WY
PONDEROSA LN
ADRIA N S T
BINNA CLE AV
CITRUS ST
ROBIN RD
VISTA ROYALE DR
W HITE LANTERN LN
RANCHGATE
RD
COPPER KETTLE W AY
FEATHER HILL DR
WIND MILL LN
ROCKY POINT RD
W HITE SPRING LN
CITY BLV D W EST
METROPOLITAN
DR
CITY PK WY WE ST
BLUE BIRD AVE
ENC
ANTO
ST
BIG
SKY
LN
EVERGREEN ST
GARFIELD AVE
COOLIDGE AVE
HOOVE R A VE
ADAMS AVE
QUINCY AVE
JACKSON AVE
MONROE AV E
LOCUST A VE
ELMWOOD STFERN STHA NDY S T
MAYFAIR AVE
MADISON AV E
DELIA LN LO
W
RY
LN
BREEZY
W
AY
DA YNA ST
LIN
W
O
OD
ST
OLD GRAND ST
LAR
CH
M
ONT
AV
BEECHWOOD ST
CHERRY ST
JOA NA DR
JOA NA DR
LARCHMONT AV E
FAIRMONT AV E
HA THAWA Y ST
BUFFALO A VE
AVALON A VE
COTTONWOOD ST
FRANZEN AVE
OLD GRAND ST
BEECHWOOD ST
BRYNWOOD ST
FLOWER ST
OLIVE LNFREEMA N L N
WESTWOOD AV
BAKER ST
LOUISE ST
G
REENB
R
IER
ST
MEMORY LN
RD
PACIFIC AV
SPINNAKER ST
HILTON ST
ANG
EL
VIEW
TER
MUIR
D
R
PO
TOMAC ST
JAM
ESTO
W
N
W
Y
SYCAMOREC
IR SYC AMORE CIR
LUDWIG ST
BREWER W Y
CANYON CREST
DR
SHALLOW BR O OKL N
BRY
NM
A
R
DR
PEPP ERTREE DR
CERRO VILLA DR
SANTA
ANA
CA
N
YO
N
R
D
RO
X
A
N
NE
ST
TOBY LN
STA RLIGHT DR
VALLEY V IEW PLCE RRO VISTA DR
SLEEPY
LN
COPA
DEORODR
WESTFORD ST
SHANNON ST
ARDMO
R
E
ST
W
E
STFO
RD
ST
ABERDEENST
LO
N
D
ERRYLN
FAIRFIELD ST
GR EEN SBORO
LN
G
RE
ENS
BOROLN
W
EY
MOUTH CT
SANTIAGO
W
Y
WILVERDO
WY
TUM
B
LEW
EED
R
D
WILLOWICK DR
B
IG
SKY
LN
RURAL RIDGE
C
IR
PEPPER CREEK WYORANGE CREEK LN
O
AK
W
Y
R
O
D
E
O
C
IR
BROADMOOR
TWINLEAF TR
APPAL OOSA TR
BROADMOOR TRAIL
HO RS ESHOETR
CHANDLER
RANCHRD
SADDLEHORN
WY
WOODWIND
A V
E
BAYBERRYST
H
ICKOR
Y
BRANCH
RD
SKYLARK PL
STRAW BERRY RDG
CROSSCREEK
W
ILLO
W
ICK
DR
WI LLOWICK CIR
LOS COYOTES DR
STETSON C T
SPYGLASS WY
ARLETTA CIR
CHAP MAN AVE
GAINSBOROUGH RD
ROMELLE A VE
RUTH PL
FERN WOOD AV
CASSELLE AV
N
UTW
OO
D
ST
WRIGHTW OOD S T
MARMONAV
EL
M
O
DENA
ROCKINGHORSEWY
INVERNESSPL
HILLSDALEDR
JAM
B
OREE
R
D
KING
S
CRO
W
N
R
D
BEEC
HW
OODST
CLEV
ELA
ND
ST
RIVER TRAIL
CINDA ST
SM
O
KETR
EE
LN
PROSP
ECT
ST
THECITY WAY
BRIGANTINE LN
MARINE DR
CATAMARAN L N
UNIVE RS ITY DR
SKYLARK P L
BONITA CT
SAN MARCOS CT
SANTA ISABE L CT
BOSCANA CT
APACHECREEKRD
SIERRA VISTA DR
SIERRA
VISTA
D
R
PRESCOTT CT
LAGUNA CT
MAGDALENA DR
PALERMO CT
SAN
RAFAEL CT
H
OLLYO
AK
RDG
ABBEYW
OODRD
SPRINGWINDS LN
GOLDENROD
LN
EDGEMONT DR
CEDARBROOKSRD
GR
AN
DV
IE
W
RD
TIM
BERG
R
OVE
RD
G
LENBROOK LN
LARKSTONE DR
LARKSTONE DR
LARKSTONE DR
LA RKSTONEDR
MARKWOOD ST
JONS W AY
JONS W AY
RA INB OW FALLS W AY
SUNS ET S T
SUNS ET S T
SAN CARLOS A VE
OCEANVIEW ST
OCEANVIEW ST
RA MONA ST
RA MONA ST
GAYLE ST SANTA ANITA ST
SANTA BARBARA P L
VALLEY V IEW STBIXBY A VE
SAND PEBB LE WAY
RIV ERBOAT WA Y
HA RTMAN ST
ALDERWOOD AVE
COVENTRY ST
RIDGEWAY RD
CHURCH HAVEN WAY
BLACK OA K RD
NOHL RANCH RD
SHADYGLEN LN
BEECHWOOD ST
LINCOLN A VE
CRYS TAL V IEW AV E
BROOK SHIRE AVE
FLETCHER AVE
ROBINHOOD P L
MARYWOOD LN
EC H O HILL WAY
S
HA
DO
W
R
IDG
E
LN
CERRO VILLA DR
LIME ST
BRIARDA LE AVE BRIARDA LE AVE
GLASS ELL ST
O'DONNELL WA Y
G
LAS
SELL
ST
MARQUART ST
MAPLEWOOD STMAPLEWOOD ST
MOCKINGBIRD PL
THREE ARCHES CIR
HA NINGER WAY
LEMON ST
VERDE LOMA S DR
BRILEY WA Y
LUDWIG ST
LEMON ST
BRILEY WA Y LUDWIG ST
VERDE LOMA S DR
KNUTH CIRKNUTH CIR
WORKMAN CIR
O
LD
R
AN
C
H
C
IR
KLAMATH PL
PARKER CIR
ATHENS A VE
TRENTON AVE
VANOWE N A VE
ABBOT T CIR
SHARON LN
SARITA PL
CA BRILLO ST
MAPLEWOOD ST
MAPLEWOOD ST
JACARANDA AV E
LOCUST A VE
ELIZA BETH PLELIZA BETH PL
LOMITA AVE
OAKMONT A VE
MAYFAIR AVE
ADOBE W AY
HE WES ST
HE WES ST
MONTE CITO PL
BINNA CLE AVE
WILKEN WA Y
CLIFFWOOD CIR
WILKEN WA Y
STA TE COLLEGE BLVD
TOWN CE NTRE PL
DONNE YBROOKE ST
BEVERLY DR
CA LIFORNIA ST
OAK S TOAK S T
HE WES ST
ROUNDUP W AY
W
ILLOW
SPRING
S
R
D
STE WART DR STE WART DR
FAS HION PARK ST
CY PRESS S T
FAIRWA Y DR
CY PRESS S T
GARDNER ST
PALMYRA A VE
ALMOND AVE
WAYFIELD ST
MALENA DR
LAURINDA LN
COATE RD
WHEELER PL
AGUA WA Y
EARLHAM ST
STOLLER LN
HE WES ST
HE WES ST
CLOVER CT
KNIGHTS BRIDGE RD AMBERWOOD ST
BRENTWOOD DR
WOODW IND A VE
FIRENZA WAY
POPLA R S TPAC
IFIC
AV
TOWN & COUNTRY RD
LAWSON W AY
VIRGINIA AV EVIRGINIA AV E
LAWSON W AY
JACARANDA AV E
JACARANDA AV E
ANNA POLIS ST GREENGROVE STRIGHTER CIR
YORBA S T
ROSALIND DR ROSALIND DR
LORETTA DR
WHEELER PL
MALENA DR
LAURINDA LNLAURINDA LN
LAURINDA LN
PROSPE CT ST
RE D ROBIN ST
RIV ERVIEW A VE
RIV ERDA LE AVE
MEADOWB ROOK AVE
ASHWOOD ST
SAN ALTO AV E
SAN BRUNO AVE
RIV ERVIEW A VE
KODIAK S T
SANTA LUCIA ST
SANTA CE CILIA ST
TUSTIN ST
MERRIMA C DR
KENNEBEC DR
RIV ERDA LE AVE
DRIFTW OOD S T
RIV ERVIEW A VE
RIP PLING CREEK DR
SANDBAR CIR
MEADOWB ROOK AVE
GLASS ELL ST
RA INIE R A VE
RA INIE R A VE
ASHWOOD ST
HE ARTHSIDE S T
RA INIE R A VE
MEADOWB ROOK ST
BALDWIN AVE
SKYWOOD ST
OLIVE A VE
ORANGE OLIVE RD
BIXBY A VE
SHERI ST
SUNV IEW DR
BALDWIN AVE
BOLINGRIDGE DR
HILLTOP DR
SAN ALANO AVE
GAYLE ST
BALDWIN AVE
HILLV IEW DR
SANTA ANA CANYON RD
RA NCHVIEW DR
TUSTIN
ST
BATAVIA ST
KENNEDY ST
KENNEDY ST
DUNTON AVE
DE LL ST
BERKELEY ST
DE LL ST
GLENSIDE S T
FERNSIDE S T
VISTA RIDGE DR
VISTA KNOLL RD
VISTA KNOLL RD VISTA BLUFF RD VISTA HEIGHTS RDVISTA VALLE Y RD
VISTA CRE ST RD
VISTA BLUFF RD
VISTA HEIGHTS RDVISTA VALLE Y RDVISTA CRE ST RD
GREEN RIVER DR
SHADY FOREST LN
TIOGA PA SS RD
BATAVIA ST
OREGON TRAIL LN
FEA THER RIVER WA Y
MERCE D TRAIL RD
GRAND RA PID RD
BADGER PA SS LN
SIERRA NEVADA W AY
GRAND RA PID RD
RIV ER TRAIL RD
RIV ER TRAIL RD
MILLSTREA M LN
WHITE WATER WAY
RIV ER TRAIL RD
RIV ER TRAIL RD
PAMPAS ST
SYLVAN CIR
BROOK SHIRE AVE
CRYS TAL V IEW AV E
CRYS TAL V IEW AV E
BROOK SHIRE AVE
BRENTWOOD AV E
CA PRI ST
AMERICAN WAY S T
WESTWAY A VECRES TWOOD ST
BERKELEY CIR GLENSIDE CIR
HA RTMAN ST
BRENTWOOD AV E
GLASS ELL ST
COTTONWOOD ST
BRENTWOOD AV E
BROOK SHIRE AVE
HE ARTHSIDE S T
HAR
TM
AN
ST
COTTONWOOD ST
FERNSIDE CIR
ASHWOOD ST
DUNBAR ST
EAST VILLAGE WAY
TUSTIN ST
SACRAMENTO ST
MILFORD ST
ROBINHOOD P L DE NIS E AVE
ALTURA AV E
BAILEY DR
M
APLE
G
R
O
VE
R
D
ENTERPRIS E ST
GLASS ELL ST
ORANGE OLIVE RD
GENESS EE ST
MEATS AVE
BURTON AV E
CHOUTEAU S T
EMERSON A VE
MAPLEWOOD STRIDGEWOOD ST
BUCK EYEW OOD AV E
BUCK EYEW OOD AV E
GROVE AVE
MEATS AVE
BRENTFORD AVE
SACRAMENTO ST
TOPAZ ST
SERRANO AV E
WINN CIR
MARK CIR
PAMELA P L
WINN CIR
GOLDENROD LN
LASSEN BL VD
YELLO
W
STO
N
E
BLV
D
M
AM
M
O
TH
CIR
GLAC
IE
R
ST
TETON AV E
SERRANO AV E
BATAVIA ST
AVENIDA PALMAR
G
LASSE
LL
ST
WIDDOWS W AY
WIDDOWS W AY
TAFT AVE
CONCORD A VE
PALMDALE A VE
CA MBRIDGE ST
BR IARDALE AVE
GLENDALE A VE
TAFT AVE
TUSTIN ST
ONYX AV E
WARBLER PL
ORIOLE P L
MEADOWLA RK PL
ORANGE B LOSS OM CIR
SUNK IST CIR
CHES TNUT A VE
TRENTON AVE
TUSTIN ST
CA MBRIDGE ST
CONCORD A VE
CHES TNUT A VE
TRENTON AVE TRENTON AVE
CHES TNUT A VE
GLASS ELL ST
CA RLE TON AVE
CA LIFORNIA ST
WILSON AV E
GREENGROVE ST QUINCY AVE
HIGHLAND S T
WILSON AV E
RE MBRANDT CIR
WYETH CIR
RE UB ENS CIR
VAN GOGH CIR
COOLIDGE AVE
HOOVE R A VE
HA RT ST
HA NDY S T
SACRAMENTO ST
WILSON AV E
LOCUST A VE
MONROE AV E
TUSTIN ST
COLLINS AVE
MONROE AV EMONROE AV E
COLLINS AVE
BUSINESS CENTER DR
COMMERCE ST
ECKHOFF ST
ORANGEW OOD A VE
POPLA R S T
ROSE AV E
ORANGE GROVE AVE
CA RRIE A VE
MARKWOOD ST
EVERETT A VE
FERN ST
HA NDY S T
HA RT ST
MALENA ST
CLINTON ST
EVERETT P L
ROSE AV E
HA MILTON A VE
ORANGE GROVE AVE
MADISON AV E
MILFORD RD
CLINTON ST
SACRAMENTO STPALM AVE
TUSTIN ST
PARK LN
DA NA PL
WAVERLY S T
MAPLEWOOD ST
GLASS ELL ST
OLIVE S T
WALNUT AV E
CY PRESS S T
LEMON ST
OLIVE S T
GLASS ELL ST
LEMON ST
CY PRESS S T
PALM AVE
FRAMPTON S T
MAIN ST
SYCAMORE AVE
SPRUCE AVE
POPLA R S T
CE DA R S T
SYCAMORE AVE
ECKHOFF ST
HOLLY ST
STE VENS STFLOWER ST
BITTERBUSH ST
SYCAMORE AVE
BEATON WA Y
WOODRIDGE CIR
MANCHES TE R A VE
CITY BLV D W EST
POINSETTIA DR
MAIN ST
LITTLE MAIN ST
ALMOND AVE
CHAP MAN AVE
MAPLE AV E
MAPLE AV E
ALMOND AVE
OLIVE S T
LEMON ST
PARK LN
CHAP MAN AVE CHAP MAN AVE
MILFORD ST
SACRAMENTO ST
SHERMAN AVE
BENNETT AV E
MALENA DR
CHAP MAN AVE
PALMYRA A VE
ROBERTA DR
KARAN LN
ROSALIND DR
WHEELER PL
DOROTHY PL
ROBERTA DR
ROSALIND DR
LORETTA DRLORETTA DR
YORBA S TTUSTIN ST
GREENGROVE DR
CA LIFORNIA ST
CHALY NN A VECHALY NN A VE
GARDNER DR
PALMYRA A VE
CA MBRIDGE STCA MBRIDGE ST
VAN BIBBE R AVE
WASHINGTON AV E
PALMYRA A VE
WASHINGTON A V E
VAN BIBBE R AVE
WASHINGTON AV E
CULVE R A VE
ORANGE S T
GRAND ST
OLIVE S T
PALMYRA A VE
SHAFFER ST
LEMON ST
GLASS ELL ST
ORANGE S T
GRAND ST CE NTER ST
LEMON ST LEMON ST
OLIVE S T
GLASS ELL ST
GRAND ST CE NTER ST
ORANGE S T
SHAFFER ST
WASHINGTON AV E
CULVE R A VE
CLA RK STCLA RK ST
PARKER ST PARKER ST
PIXLEY S T
BATAVIA ST
PALMYRA A VE
PEPPE R S T
LIME ST
LA VETA AV E
LA VETA AV E
CRES T RD BEDFORD RD
DE VON RD
LA VETA AV E
LILAC LN
CA SA LINDA CIR
LA LINDA DR
G
LE
N
VIEW
PL
MAIN ST
FELDNER RD
BEDFORD RDCRES T RDORCHA RD A VE ORCHA RD A VE
POINSETTIA DR
FLOWER ST
PALMYRA A VE
ANITA DR
OUTLE T DR
STY LE ST
THE CITY DR
JUSTICE CENTER WAY
LEWIS ST
PARK GRIFFITH AVE
PARK BALBOA AVE
LEWIS ST
TWINLEA F CIR
SANDALWOOD CIR
EL PRADO A VE
PARK CENTRAL AVE
PARK CENTRAL AVE
PARKBALBOAAVE
BRISTOL ST
CRES T RD
BRONSON S T
MAIN ST
TOWN & COUNTRY RD
PARKER ST
LA VETA AV E
LA VETA PA RK CIR
TULAROS A AVE
FAS HION PARK ST
ROSEWOOD AV E
GLASS ELL ST
TOLUCA A VE
PINE ST
GARDNER ST
FAIRWA Y DR
SUMMERFIE LD W AY
FIRWOOD CT ATW OOD CT AUTUMN RIDGE CT
CINNAMON W AYMARIGOLD LN
NA TURE WA YEVERGREE N LN ROCK CRE EK DR
BREEZY WAY
FAIRMONT WA Y
LOWRY ST
ORANGE CE NTER DR
ANAHEIM WAY
VILLAREAL DR
CHAUNCEY
LN
ABBEY LN
MANDE VILLE PL
MANDE VILLE PL
KINGSGATE DR
ROUNDTREE CT
WISH ING WELLLN
WOODBINE
RD
RIDGEWAY RD
CH APEL HILL RD
CUNNINGH AM CT
GREEN GA RDE N LNMARYWOOD DR
MEADOW GROVE RD
MEATS AVE
MEATS AVE
GLEN
CAN
YO
N
RD
NEW GATE W AY
CO
TTAG
E
H
ILL
DR
MILLBAN
K
DR
RIDGE PARK LN
MEADOW GROVE RD
MEATS AVE
BRYCE AVE
MARTINIQUE CT
MEADOWRIDGE RD
LONGRIDGE DR
ROCKRIDGE CIR
SUMMITRIDGE LN
FEA
THERHILLDR
BRYNMAR DR
STONERIDGE ST
SANTIA GO B LVD
WINCHES TE R CIR
WINDS OR DR
ROBIN HOOD CIR
CA STLEFORD DR
LINCOLN S T
FITSCHEN RANCH RD
MALLARD ST
MORGAN ST
LACONIA DR
WANDA RD
VIDA DR
COLLINS AVE
ROBERTO ST
KATHLE EN ST
ADELE ST
KINTYRE DR
SIAVO
HN
D
R
LAMBETH CT
WHITE CHAP EL CT PROSPE CT ST
PROSPE CT ST
SALISBURY CIR
HA MMOND CIR
METCALF CIR
TURNBERRY DR
WALNUT AV E
SYCAMORE AVE
PALM AVE
KIRKWOOD AVE
WOODLA ND S T
LA MIRADA LN WESLEY CIR
HE WES AV
SHERWOOD AVE
GREENWOOD AV
ESPLANADE ST LARKSTONE CIR
WRIGHTW OOD S T WRIGHTW OOD S T
CIRCULO WA Y
BURLY AVE
ALANDA AVE
NUTWOOD ST
DONNA AVE
PALMYRA A VE
JAMES ST
CHAP MAN AVE
ESPLANADE ST
PEARL ST
CE NTER ST
VINE ST
ESPLANADE ST
EARLHAM ST
CE NTURY DR
THOMA S ST
SPRING ST
JAMES ST
SYCAMORE AVE
SERANADO S T
HE WES ST
WALNUT AV E
HE WES ST
JAMES ST
JAMES ST
EL CARMEN AVE
HE WES ST
MONTA NA CIR
FRANCISCO DR
LINCOLN CIR
O
RA
N
GE
G
ROVE
CIR
ADAMS RANCH RD
ADAMS CIR
WULFF DR
LONGRIDGE DR
PALMYRA P L
WESTRIDGE DR
RIDGEWAY RD
LONGHURST ST
NE W GATE W AY
WATERFORD S T
CO
U
R
TLAND
S
T
OAKHURST AVE
TOW NSEND AVE
ROSEMERE ST
VIA ESCOLA
FITZGER ALD AVE
WHITEHALL ST
TALB OT ST
ASHBY WA Y
MANDE VILLE PL
WOODB INE RD
BRADFORD A VE
CA MDE N S T
PRESTON ST
DA NB URY S T
BRADFORD AVE
HA STINGS AVE
PICCA DILLY PL
BLACKBURN DR
PADDINGTON CT
SHEFFIELD DR
NA PLES CT
HE NLE Y PL
HA MPTON ST
EL RITO DR
VIA ESCOLA
PLAYANO AVE
SYCAMORE ST
WALKMAN CIR
SANTIA GO B LVD
STA CE Y LEE LN
SANTIA GO B LVD
JULIE AVE
VALENCIA DR
SAN REMO P L
ELSINORE A VE
VILLA PARK RD
HIDDEN TRA IL
BRIDLE PATH
RA NCHO S ANTIA GO B LVD
CHERRYWOOD LN
ORANGE GROVE AVE
HA MLIN S T
KENYON PL
WALNUT AV E
HA MLIN S T
CHRISTINE ST
RICHARD ST
RA NCHO S ANTIA GO B LVD
SILVERLEA F AV E
RE NE E ST
CHAP MAN AVE
SANDPIPER CIR
HA MLIN S T
SOLANA DR
WOODLA WN DR
LO
S
TIM
B
RE
S
ST
LOS MES QUITES ST
PHILO AVE
VIA LARDO A VE
STOLLER LN
MONTGOME RY PL
ESPANITA ST
CRES THAVE N LN
PHILLIPS PL
FOWLER AVE
PARKVIEW TE R
MAYNARD WY
A
LTA
PA
NO
RA
M
A
WESTVIEW
DR
ROCKING
HORSEWAY
SINGING
W
O
OD
ST
QUAIL LN ROTH LN
PEARL ST
STILLW
ATER
AVE
BOBW
HITE
W
AY
CANNON
ST PARTRIDGE LN
CANYON VIEW AVE
TUMBLEW EED DR
PINYON PINE DR
DA NDELION DR
INDIGO CT
CANNON
ST
STILLWATERAVE
JIMSON CT
CHANDLER RANCH RD
PONY CT
CHANDLER RANCH RD
CHAP MAN AVE
BRAMBLES
W
A
Y
BREIGHTON CIR
RANCHW
OOD T
RL
SADDLEHILL TRL
TANGLEWOOD TRL
SU N DANCECIR
RA NCH WOOD TRL
AMAPOLA AVE
R
ID
G
ELIN
E
RD
RIDGELINE
RD
MEADS AVE
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
SANTIAGO CANYON RD
EQUITATIO
N
W
AY
GROVE WOOD LN
COLONY ST
HUNTERS WAY
HIDDEN OA KS LN
SANDBERG LN
DIA
N
E
DR
SIDEW
IN
DER
DR
HUMMINGB IRD CT
CANN
O
N
ST
CA BRILLO ST
YORKTOW
N
CIR
CE RRITOS DR
SERRANO AVE
CRE ST DE VILLE
APPLEW OOD DR
VIA ESCOLA CA NNON S T
GRAN
DVIE
W
R
D
TIM
BER
GR
O
VE
R
D
SMOKEY AVE
ORANGE P ARK BLVD
WATERTON AVE
YOSE MITE A VE
JOS HUA TREE A VE
BRYCE AVE
SHENANDOAH AVE
FORE ST S T
YELLO
W
STO
N
E
B
LVD
JOS HUA TREE A VE
ORANGE P ARK BLVD
RIV ER BIRCH CIR
PEPPE R W OOD CIR
SWEETSHADE CIR
ORANGE P ARK BLVD
ORANGE P ARK BLVD
CLIFFWAY DR
CAL
LE
BAJA
ORANGE P ARK BLVD
CALLE
G
R
AN
D
E
BU
CKS
KIN
W
AY
PINNACLE POINTEPHEASANT LN
RA VEN LN
DOVE ST
TERRACE RDG
CA NY ON RDG
D OVE LN
KINGS CROW N RD
ST. GERMAIN CIR
NOTRE DAM E ST
NA NCE CIR
NO
TRE
DAM
E
ST
ROCKING HORSE WAY
BRETON CIR
ALLISON CIR
MYSTIC
LN
CH
ESTERFIELD
CIR
OXBRIDG
E
C
IR
SKYLARK P L
LEMON CREEK CIR
W
ILLO
W
SPR
IN
GS
RD N
EW
PO
R
T
BLVD
NEW
PO
RT
BLVD
WHITE OAK RIDGE
WILDFLOWER AV
CA NY ON VIEW AVE
WALNUT RIDGE RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
AM APOLA AVE
BUTTONBUSH
TRL
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
FOX RUN LN
BEAR TRE E LNFAW NW OOD LNBROOK GLEN LN
DE ERFIELD LN
WHITE OAK RIDGE
BOX CANYON RD
ROYAL OAK DR
THISTL E CT
LAZY MEADOW RD
CANDL EBERRY CIR
BRIAR CREE K RD
WOODW IND A VE
W
HITE
OAK
RDG
FAIRFIELD LN
SAGE HILLS RD
SAGE HILLS RD
SHADOW PINE S RD
MAHOGA NY ST
FAIRFIELD LN
SAN LUIS DR
TIMBERLAND
AVE GRISLY CANYON DR
JAMBOREE RD
PETERS CANYON RD
SUGAR LOAF PEA KR
D
COLORADO LN
XTRA W AY
PARK LN
ORAN GETR
EE
LN
MONTGOME RY WAY
PRIVATE DR
ES
TATE
DR
BRIARDA LE AVE
HIG
HTR
EE
LN
CHAP MAN AVE
MOUNTAIN A VE
CR
ES
T
DE
VILLE
PARAGON WAY
FAIRPORT
C
IR
MONACO PK WY
HORIZON DR
HORIZON DR
ALEXANDRIA ST
CHELSEY
W
O
ND
ER
VIEW
DR
GLEN ALBY N LN
GLEN ROBIN LN
GLEN ALBY N LN
GLEN ARRAN LN
NICHOLS AVE
NICOLAS AV E
NORFOLKAVE
CHADWICKPKWY
SCARBOROUGH CT
SKY GATE LN
AVALON A VE
ALTA VIEW DRPROMONTORY W AY
CHATHAM TER
KENDRA
DR
CHES HIRE RD
HA MPSHIRE RD
HIGHWOOD RD
PORTICO TE R
SKYTOP CT
FALCONER WAY
HAW KSFIELD WAY
EATONCT
PORTICO
TER
EATON CT
SERR ANOAVE
DREW WAY
MULB ERRY LN
BUCK THORN LNBERRY TRE E LN
SUGAR PINE LN
CA MPHOR TRE E LN
BIRCHBA RK LN
BOTTLE BRUSH LN
APPLE TREE LN
SMILEY DR
SAGUARO DR
WIMBLETON CT
CE NTER ST
GRAND ST
ORANGE S T
CY PRESS S T
CLA RK ST
VISTA RIDGE DR
VISTA RIDGE DR
WATERW
H
E
E
LW
AY
STONEBROOK DR
BRYNHURST RD
BOLINGER CIR
BOLINGER CIR
BO
LIN
G
E
R
C
IR
BOLINGER DR
HE ARTHSIDE S T
MURRIETTA PL
BATAVIA ST
LOFTWOOD LN
HA RTFORD RD
CA NNON S T
MADRID LN
KENDRA LOOP
KENDRA LOOP
KENDRA LOOP
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
WEEPING WILLOW AVE
TULIP TREE AV E
TULIP TREE AV E
WEEPING WILLOW AVE
PEBBLE CRE EK LN
PEBBLE CRE EK LNSHADYVALE ST
SHADYVALE ST
SUGARBERRY S T
SUNRISE CT
SPICEWOOD ST
RIV ERBEND PKWY
RIV ERBEND PKWY
SPARKLEB ERRY AVE
CORK TREE DR
CORK TREE DR
RIV ERBEND PKWYTORREY PINE LN
LINDEN DR
MOUNTAIN HOLLY AVE
JUNEBERRY ST
HONEY TRE E WAY
RIV ERBEND PKWY
RIV ERBEND PKWY
CA MPHOR
PL
JAMBOREE RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
SANTIA GO CA NY ON RD
NICKY WAY
JACK PINE LN
TAFT AVE
VI LLAGETOWNCENTER
GRIJALV A WY
BOND AVE
LITTLE LN
DE EP SPRINGS RD
DESIGNER
DR
GLEN DR
MORADA DR
HE WES ST
DE NIS E AVE
VILLAREALDR
KENDRADR
TUSTIN ST
CANNO
N
ST
THE CITY DR
TUSTIN ST
EARLHAM ST
LEWIS ST LEWIS ST
PARK VINE S T
ESPLANADE ST
ALEXANDER LN
LA VETA DR
SILVERWOOD ST
BOBW HITE W AY
SHOSHONE AVE
BATAVIA ST
RUTH PL
ALMOND AVE
CE NTER ST
PALM AVE
LA CAPELLA CT
LA
C
O
LINA
C
T
GARRITYWAY
LORETTA DR
DOROTHY AVE
SAN JUAN DR
ORANGE GROVE AVE
MAPLEWOOD ST
VILLANUEVA DR
GABRIELLE LN GABRIEL LE LN
VILLANUEVA DR
MAPLEWOOD ST
R-O
R-O
R-O
R-O
R-O
R-3
M-1
R-3 C-1
C-2 R-1-7
C-2R-2-6 (A)R-2-6 (A)
R-3 R-1-6 R-2-6 (A)R-O R-3
R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7
R-3
R-1-7R-1-6
R-1-6R-1-7R-3R-3
R-1-7
R-3
R-1-7R-1-6R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3R-3 R-1-7
R-3 R-2-6 R-3 R-1-7
R-3
R-1-7
R-2-8
R-2-8 M-1 M-2
M-1 M-2
M-2
M-1
M-2M-1M-1M-1 M-2M-2
R-O M-2
M-2M-1
M-2
M-2 M-2
M-2 M-2
M-2R-O
M-2 M-2
M-2
M-2M-2
M-2 M-2
M-2M-2
M-2
M-2 M-2 M-2
M-2
M-1
M-2
M-2
M-2 M-2
M-1
M-2
M-2
R-3 R-3
R-1-8 R-1-8
R-1-8 R-1-8R-3 R-3 C-TRR-1-7
C-1
P-C
P-C
P-C
R-1-6
(SP)
R-3
(SP)
R-1-6
(SP)
P-C
R-3 R-3 R-2-6 R-1-8
C-1 R-3
R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7 C-TRR-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-7
R-3(A)R-3(A)
R-1-7 R-1-7
C-TR
R-3 R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1 -7
R-1-7R-1-7R-3
(A) M-H
R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7
C-TR
R-1-7
C-1 R-3 C-TRR-3 C-PC-P
C-TR
R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7
R-3R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7O-P
R-1-8
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-8
M-2
R-1-8 R-1-7
R-1-8R-1-8
R-1-8
C-TRM-2
R-1-8
R-1-10
R-1-7
R-1-7
C-1
R-1-8 R-1-7
R-1-10 R-1-10R-1-8
R-3M-1
R-1-10 R-1-10
C-1
R-1-8R-3 R-1-8
R-1-8R-1-8C-1
R-3
R-1-8 R-1-8
R-3
R-3
R-3R-3
R-1-8R-1-8
R-1-8M-1 R-1-8C-1
R-1-8 C-TRR-3R-2-6 R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8R-1-8C-1 R-3
R-1-8 R-1-8
R-3
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8M-1 R-1-8
C-TRC-1 R-1-8 R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8R-1-6R-3
R-3
R-O
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7R-1-7R-O R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7O-PC-1 R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7R-1-7C-2
R-3
R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7R-1-7
R-2-6 R-2-6R-3 R-2-6
(P)C-1
R-1-7R-3 R-2-6
R-1-7 R-2-6
R-3
O-PC-2
C-1
R-3C-1
O-PO-P C-1 O-P C-TRC-2 O-P
R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7R-3R-1-7 R-3R-1-7 C-1
R-3R-2-6 R-1-7 R-1-7
C-1 R-1-7
R-3R-1-7R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7
R-3
R-3
R-2-6 C-TRR-3
R-1-7
C-1
R-O R-1-7
C-1
R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6
C-TR R-1-6 P-C P-CR-1-6R-1-6
R-1-6
P-CR-1-6
R-1-6R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6
R-4
(SP) R-1-6 P-I R-1-6
R-2-6R-1-6
OTMU-15
(SP)
OTMU-15R-O R-1-6 R-2-6 R-1-6R-2-6
R-2-6R-3 R-1-6 R-2-6R-2-6
R-1-6
R-1-6R-1-6
R-1-6
P-I
(SP)
P-I
(SP)
R-1-6
P-CP-CR-1-6
R-1-6 P-C
R-1-6R-1-6
C-TR
R-1-6 A-1 P-CR-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6 P-CR-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6 P-C
R-1-6 P-CR-1-20
R-1-10 R-1-10R-1-10 R-1-6 P-CR-1-6 P-C R-1-8 P-CA-1P-C
C-TR
O-P P-C M-1R-1-6 A-1R-1-8R-1-20 R-1-8R-1-20
R-3 R-1-10(A) P-CR-1-10 R-1-6R-1-6R-1-10R-1-10R-1-8 R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6C-TR R-1-10 A-1
R-1-6R-1-6 P-CR-1-20 R-1-6R-1-8 R-1-8R-1-10R-1-8R-3 R-1-6R-1-8 R-1-6R-1-6(A) R-1-8 R-1-8 R-1-20
R-1-8 R-1-8 P-C
M-H
O-PR-1-6 R-3 R-1-6 R-1-6C-3R-3 (P)O-P C-1R-1-6C-3 (P)R-2-6 (A) (P) R-3
OTMU-24
(SP)
OTMU-15
(SP)R-1-6R-3
R-2-6
P-I (SP)
OTMU-24 (SP)
R-4
OTMU-15S
(SP)
OTMU-24
(SP)
UMU
C-1
UMU
R-2-6 M-H
R-1-6UMU R-1-6C-1
O-P R-3 R-3C-1R-2-6 R-3C-1C-1 R-1-7R-2-6
R-2-6
R-2-6 R-2-6R-2-6O-PR-3
R-1-6
R-1-6
OTMU-15S OTMU-15S
(SP)
R-1-8 P-CR-1-8R-1-20
P-CC-TR P-C P-CR-1-7
R-1-20 P-C
R-1-7
R-1-8 P-CP-C
R-1-8
R-1-8 P-C A-1
R-OR-1-8
R-3 R-1-8
R-3
R-3 R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-6 R-1-6M-2 M-2 R-1-6R-O R-1-6
M-1
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-3M-2 R-1-6R-1-6
C-1R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6R-3 R-3M-2
M-2 R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6
C-2 C-2 R-3C-1 R-1-7P-I P-CR-3R-1-6 R-1-7R-3
R-1-6 R-3
R-1-6
R-2-6
R-3R-2-6 R-3 R-2-6C-1 R-2-6R-3 R-3 R-1-7 R-1-6R-2-6
R-3
UMU
M-1 R-1-6R-1-6
C-1R-1-6 P-IM-2M-1 R-2-6
(SP)R-2-6R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6R-2-6 R-2-6
C-1C-1R-3 R-1-6R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3R-1-6
R-3
R-3 R-1-7 R-3R-2-6R-2-6 R-1-7R-2-6
R-3 P-CR-3 R-3R-3 UMUR-2-6 R-1-6 R-1-7 R-1-7 R-1-7R-3R-3 C-1UMU R-3
R-2-6 UMUR-O
R-3 R-1-20
C-TR R-1-40R-3 R-1-8
R-3 (A)
(A)
R-1-8 R-1-8 R-1-8R-3(A) R-OR-3 P-IR-1-8
R-1-8 R-1-8
R-3 R-1-8 R-1-8 R-1-8
R-3 R-1-8
OTMU-15S
R-1-8 R-O
R-1-8R-1-8 R-1-8R-1-12 R-1-8 R-1-8R-1-8
C-TR R-1-12 R-1-8R-1-8 R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8 R-1-8 R-O R-1-40R-1-8R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-10S-GS-G S-GR-1-8
R-1-8 R-1-40 R-1-40R-1-10R-1-10R-1-8R-1-8M-1 R-1-8 R-1-8 R-1-20R-1-8R-1-8
R-1-8 R-1-8
R-1-40R-1-8 S-G
R-OR-1-40 R-1-20R-1-8
R-1-10
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7
S-G R-OS-GC-1
C-1 R-1-7C-TR
R-1-7
R-1-7R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7O-P
R-1-7 O-P O-P
C-TR
R-O
P-I
P-C
P-C
C-PC-1 C-P
C-TRC-PR-1-6R-3 R-1-6C-R R-3C-2
R-1-6R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6
R-3M-2
R-3
R-1-6M -1
R-1-6
M-1
O-PR-3P-I R-1-6
P-C
P-C P-C
OTMU-15
(SP)
R-1-6
(SP) R-3 (SP)
OTMU-15
(SP)
P-C
R-1-6 R-1-6M-2 M-2
R-3 R-2-6
R-2-6 (A)R-1-6R-1-6R-1-6C-1 R-1-6 C-1(A)R-1-6 R-3
R-2-6 (A)C-1 R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6R-1-6
P-C
R-1-6
R-2-6
P-C
P-C
P-C
P-C
R-2-6
(A)
M-2 M-H
R-3 (A)
R-3 (A)
M-1
M-2 M-2
R-3 (A)R-1-6
R-2-6 (A)
R-3 (A)M-1 M-2M-2 R-1-6C-1 R-1-6R-O M-1
R-1-6
R-2-6
P-I
(SP)
OTMU-15S
R-1-6 R-1-6
P-I (SP)
P-1 (SP)
C-1(A)R-1-6C-1C-1 R-1-6 R-1-6
O-P
M-1 C-1M-1 M-2
C-1 R-1-6 O-P
C-1R-1-6M-2 R-3M-2 R-1-6R-3M-2 M-2
R-3
R-1-6
C-1
M-1
O-PM-2
M-2 R-1-6R-1-6R-3 R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6M-2 R-2-6
R-2-6R-1-6R-1-6R-3
M-1
R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6R-O
R-3O-P M-2
R-2-6M-1
R-1-6R-2-6
C-P O-P R-1-6M-1 R-2-6 R-2-6(A)R-3 R-1-6R-3 R-3 R-1-6 R-1-6 UMU
R-1-6 R-3R-1-6 R-1-6
CRTDIS
R-1-6
R-1-6
(SP)
M-1
R-3 R-1-6 C-1R-1-6 R-1-6
R-3R-1-6
R-2-6
OTMU-15S
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-2-6 R-2-6R-1-6
R-2-6
P-I (SP)
P-I
(SP)
P-I (SP)
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-2-6R-1-6R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6 C-2R-1-6 R-1-6R-2-6 R-3R-1-6
R-1-6 P-I (SP)R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6 R-O R-1-6R-1-6R-1-6
R-2-6P-I
(SP)
P-I (SP)
P-C (SP)
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6M-H R-1-6
R-1-6R-1-6
C-1
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6
R-1-6R-1-6
OTMU-15S
R-1-6 R-1-6R-2-6 R-3
(SP) R-2-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6R-1-6 O-PR-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6 R-2-6R-2-6 (A) R-1-6R-1-6R-1-6 R-3P-I R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6 (SP)
R-1-6R-3
R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6
P-I
P-I
C-2C-2
OTMU-15S
OTMU-15S
P-I
(SP)
P-I
(SP)
R-3
R-1-6 R-3
R-1-6UMU
UMU
C-1 R-1-6
R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6(A)(A) R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6
OTMU-24
(SP)R-3 O-P
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
P-I (SP)
OTMU-15
(SP)
P-I
(SP)
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6R-2-6 R-1-6
R-1-6
R-3R-1-6 R-1-6R-3
R-3 (A) OTMU-24
(SP)R-1-6C-1O-P R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6R-3 (A) R-1-6C-1 C-1
OTMU-15
(SP)
R-O
(SP)
OTMU-15
(SP)
OTMU-15
(SP)
R-1-6
UMU
R-1-6
C-1R-3R-3R-3 R-1-6(A)
R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6(A) (A) C-1 R-2-6R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6
NMU-24
NMU-24
C-1 R-1-6
OTMU-15
(SP)
OTMU-15
(SP)
P-I (SP)
P-I (SP) P-I (SP)
R-1-6 R-3R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6
R-1-6
R-2-6
R-1-6R-O
R-3R-1-6 R-1-6C-2
R-3
C-2
R-1-6
NMU-24
NMU-24 NMU-24
C-R
C-R
UMU
R-1-6C-1
R-3 (SP)
M-2
(SP)
P-I
(SP)
R-2-6 (SP)
OTMU-15
(SP)
C-2R-3C-2
R-1-6C-2C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2C-2 C-2 O-POTMU-15S OTMU-15S
(SP) C-1 OTMU-15SOTMU-15S C-1
UMU
UMU
P-C
O-P O-P O-P O-PC-2 C-2 OTMU-15SC-2C-2C-2
OTMU-24
(SP)C-2 C-2
OTMU-15
C-2 R-3C-2 R-3 R-2-6 R-3
UMU
UMU UMU
UMU
UMUUMU
OTMU-15SC-1
C-2 (P) O-POTMU-15SR-1-6
C-1 O-PO-PO-PR-1-6 O-PR-1-6 C-2
P-I
R-2-6
R-2-6R-3R-1-6
C-2
OTMU-15
R-3
OTMU-15
R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6
R-1-6
(A)R-1-6 (A)R-1-6 R-2-6 (A)R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6R-3 P-I R-1-6NMU-24
R-1-6
(SP)
UMU
UMU
UMU
R-3R-1-6M-H
R-2-6
R-1-6
P-I R-1-6O-PR-3
OTMU-15S
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6 (SP)
R-1-6
R-4 (SP) R-1-6R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6 R-2-6 (A) (A)R-2-6R-1-6R-1-6
OTMU-15SR-3 R-2-6
O-PNMU-24 R-1-6R-3R-3 R-1-6 R-1-6 R-2-6 R-1-6R-2-6R-1-6 C-1R-1-6C-1 R-1-6
O-P R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6 C-1C-1 R-1-6R-3 R-1-6R-1-6R-O R-1-6 R-1-6M-H R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-6R-3 R-1-6
OTMU-15
R-1-6R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-2-6 (A)
R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-4R-1-6 R-1-6
R-4
OTMU-15S
C-1
R-1-6 R-1-6O-P R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6R-3 R-1-6
P-I
NMU-24
O-P
P-I
R-3 R-1-6O-PR-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6 R-4R-3
R-1-6
NMU-24
OTMU-15
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6 R-2-6R-1-6
R-1-6
R-2-6R-1-6
R-4R-4
O-P
R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6R-1-6R-O
R-3 R-2-6 R-1-7R-3
UMU P-CC-1 R-3 R-1-6R-3
R-3O-P
R-1-6
OTMU-15
(SP)
OTMU-24
(SP)
OTMU-15S
R-O R-1-7R-3R-3 O-PUMUR-2-6
R-3UMU R-1-6R-OR-3 UMUUMU
R-4
C-1
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-20
R-1-10
R-1-10
R-1-20R-1-10 R-1-10
R-1-40
R-1-10
R-1-20R-1-10R-1-8 R-1-20
R-1-8
R-1-8 R-1-10
R-1-40
R-1-10
O.C.F.C.D.
R-1-8R-1-8
R-1-40
R-1-40
O.C.F.C.D.
R-1-10R-1-6 R-1-8O-PR-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-8
O.C.F.C.D.
OTMU-15S OTMU-15S OTMU-15S
R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6
R-1-8 R-1-8C-TR
R-1-6 O.C.F.C.D.
R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-8R-1-8
O.C.F.C.D.
R-3 R-1-40R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-8
R-1-20
R-1-8
(P.U.D. 706-75)
R-1-8R-3 R-1-6 R-1-6
C-TR R-1-8
R-1-8R-1-6
R-1-6R-3 R-1-6
R-1-10
R-1-6 R-1-8R-3 R-3 R-1-40R-1-7
R-1-6 R-1-6 R-1-20R-3C-1 R-1-7 R-1-40S-G
R-O
R-3 R-1-10R-3 R-1-40R-1-6 P.U.D.R-1-6
R-1-7 R-1-8R-1-7R-3
P.U.D.R-1-40R-1-6 R-1-6R-3 R-1-40R-1-10R-1-7 R-1-8R-1-8 R-3
R-3 R-1-10
R-1-6 R-1-6M-H
R-1-7R-3 R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-40
R-1-6 R-1-10R-3 R-1-7R-1-6 R-1-7
R-1-6 R-1-10 R-1-40A-1R-1-6C-1
R-3 R-1-8R-1-6(A)R-3 R-1-6 R-1-7 R-1-40R-3
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6 R-OC-1 R-2-6 (A) P-I
R-1-10S-GR-3
R-3
R-3
R-1-6 R-1-15
R-3 R-1-40
R-3 R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-6(A) R-3 R-1-7
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-7
R-1-10
R-1-7 R-1-7A-1
R-1-6C-1 R-3
R-1-6 R-1-7(A) R-1-40
R-1-6
(A)
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-15M-H
R-1-7R-1-6 R-1-15
R-1-6O-P (A)R-3 R-2-6 (A)
R-1-6C-1 P.U.D.R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-7 R-1-15 R-1-15
R-1-6 R-1-6C-1 R-1-6
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7R-1-6 R-1-7R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6 R-3R-1-6 R-1-6 P-IR-1-7 R-1-7R-1-6
C-1 R-1-6 R-O R-1-7R-3 R-1-6 R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-6
(A)
(A) R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-7
R-3
R-3 A-1 R-1-20R-O R-1-40R-3
R-1-7 P.U.D.R-1-7
R-1-40R-1-7C-1 C-1R-1-40
R-1-6 R-O
R-1-6R-1-6 R-1-7R-1-6 R-1-7
R-1-6 R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-6 R-1-7R-3 R-1-6 P.U.D. P-I
R-3 P-CR-1-40 P-CP-C
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7
(A)
(A) R-O R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-6 P-CR-1-6
R-3 R-O
R-2-6 R-1-6 R-1-7R-1-6
R-1-6 R-1-6
R-1-7
R-1-6 P-CR-1-20R-1-7R-1-6 R-4R-1-6 R-1-20R-3 P-C P-CR-1-6 P-CR-1-20 R-1-7 R-1-6 R-1-6R-1-7 P-CR-O P-C
R-3 R-1-7R-3
R-1-7R-3 R-1-6 R-1-20A-1 P-CR-1-6 R-4R-3 R-1-6 P-CR-1-7R-1-7 P-CC-1 R-1-7 P-C R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-6
R-1-7 R-1-6R-2-6 R-1-7 P-CC-1 P-C
R-3
R-1-7R-1-20C-P
C-1 P-C
R-2-6C-2 P-CC-1
P-I
P-C(A)R-3 C-1R-2-6 P-C
M-H P-C
R-1-7
C-1 R-1-20O-P C-1 R-3 P-C
C-1
C-1C-1 C-1 C-1C-1 R-4 A-1 P-C
R-1-6 P-CC-1 C-1 C-2 P-CR-1-7R-1-6C-1 C-1
C-1C-1 C-1C-1 C-1 C-1C-1 C-1
C-1 R-1-6C-1 P-C
(A) O-P R-1-20
C-1 P-CC-2 R-3R-3 R-1-7 P-CR-3 C-1 P.U.D. R-1-7R-1-6R-2-6 R-3 P-CR-2-6R-3 R-2-6 R-2-6(A) R-3
R-2-6 P-CR-1-6 P-C
R-3R-1-7R-O R-2-6
R-1-6 P-CR-2-7R-2-6 P-CR-3 R-2-6 R-1-6R-2-6R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-6R-3
(A) R-1-20 R-1-20 P-CR-2-6 R-1-20
R-1-7 R-1-7
(A) P-C(A)R-3
R-3
C-1
R-1-7
R-1-7 P.U.D.
R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7 R-2-8
R-1-7R-1-7
R-3 P-C
R-2-6
R-2-6
P-C
(A)
R-1-7 R-1-20 R-1-7R-2-6R-3 (A)
R-3R-1-7 P-C
P.U.D. R-1-7R-3R-2-6 (A) R-1-20R-1-7 P-CR-1-7 R-1-20
R-1-7 R-2-6R-1-7 R-OR-3 P.U.D.R-3C-1 P.U.D.(A) R-1-7 R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-20R-1-7R-1-7 R-3 R-3R-1-7 P.U.D.R-3 R-1-7 R-3R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-20
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-20M-H R-1-7
C-1 R-OR-1-6R-1-7 R-1-7R-1-7 P.U.D.R-1-6 R-O
R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-6R-1-7R-3R-3 R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8 R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8R-1-8 R-1-8 R-1-8R-1-7R-3 R-1-8
C-1 R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-7 R-1-8C-2 R-1-8 R-1-8R-1-8R-1-8 R-1-7R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8
R-1-8R-1-8 R-1-8
R-1-8
R-2-7R-2-7
R-1-8C-1
R-2-7 R-1-8R-2-7 R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-8
R-1-8R-2-7
R-1-8
R-O
P-C
P-C
R-3
R-3
R-1-8
R-2-7
P.U.D.
R-2-7
P.U.D.
R-2-7
P.U.D.
P.U.D.
R-2-7
P.U.D.
R-2-7
P.U.D.
R-1-40
P.U.D.
R-1-40
P.U.D.
R-2-7
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-2-6
(A)
R-1-6(P)
R-O
R-O
S-H
P-I
R-3
UMU
UMU
UMU
C-1
R-2-6
R-O
R-O
R-O
R-1-12
O-P
R-2-6R-3
C-2 C-2
R-3 R-3
C-2
R-2-6
R-2-6
R-3
R-2-6(A)
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-6(P)
R-3
R-1-8
R-3
O-P
P-I (SP)
P-I (SP)
R-1-6
R-1-10
R-1-10R-1-10
R-1-7R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-7R-1-7 R-1-7
R-1-7
R-1-20
R-1-20
R-1-15
R-1-10
R-1-40
R-1-40
R-1-40
R-1-20
R-1-20
R-1-12
P-C
R-O R-O
OTMU-15
OTMU-15
OTMU-15
OTMU-15
OTMU-15
OTMU-15
OTMU-15S OTMU-15S OTMU-15S
R-O
R-1-6
R-1-7
R-1-8
O-PO-P
R-1-40
P-I
C-1
C-1
P-I (SP)
O-P
UMU
UMU C-R
R-3 (SP)
UMU
UMU
UMU
5 55
91 57
91 57
22 55
241
261
241
241
CITY OF ORANGE
ZONING MAP
Legend
Residential
Max. Mult. FamilyR-4
Limited
Business
C-1
General
BusinessC-2
CommercialC-3
Commercial
Professional
C-P
Commercial
Recreation
C-R
Light
Manufacturing
M-1
IndustrialM-2
Mobile
Home
M-H
Office
Professional
O-P
Public
Institution
P-I
Planned
CommunityP-C
Sand & GravelS-G
O.C.F.C.D.OCFCD
UnzonedUNZONED
Public Institution
Chapman University
Santa Fe Depot
St Johns
P-I (SP)
Urban Mixed UseUMU
Neighborhood Mixed UseNMU-24
Old Towne Mixed Use-15OTMU-15
Old Towne Mixed Use
Spoke StreetOTMU-15S
Old Towne Mixed Use-24OTMU-24
Limited Business
Tustin Redevelopment
Project Area
C-TR
National Register Old Towne Historic District
Local Old Towne Orange Historic District (1998)
Single Family Res.
6000 sq ft
R-1-6
Single Family Res.
7000 sq ft
R-1-7
Single Family Res.
8000 sq ft
R-1-8
Single Family Res.
10000 sq ft
R-1-10
Single Family Res.
12000 sq ft
R-1-12
R-1-12-E
Single Family Res.
12000 sq ft
Equestrian Overlay District
Single Family Res.
15000 sq ft
R-1-15
Single Family Res.
20000 sq ft
R-1-20
Single Family Res.
40000 sq ft
R-1-40
Residential Duplex
6000 sq ft
R-2-6
Residential Duplex
7000 sq ft
R-2-7
Residential Duplex
8000 sq ft
R-2-8
Residential
Multiple Family
R-3
AgriculturalA-1
Recreation
Open Space
R-O
Slope & HazardS-H
Residential Multiple Family
Single Story OverlayR-3(A)
Residential Duplex
6000 sq ft
Parking Overlay
R-2-6 (P)
Residential Duplex
6000 sq ft
Single Story Overlay
R-2-6 (A)
Single Family Res.
6000 sq ft
Parking Overlay
R-1-6 (P)
Single Family Res.
6000 sq ft
Single Story Overlay
R-1-6 (A)
Single Family Res.
7000 sq ft
Parking Overlay
R-1-7 (P)
Residential Multiple Family
Parking OverlayR-3(P)
I
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500
Feet
300 E CHAPMAN AVE
ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92866
NOTE: Some recent changes and improvements may
not have been added to the map at the time of printing.
No part of this map shall be reproduced for
commercial purposes. Map prepared by :
Public Works G.I.S. Section
on September 1st, 2020
N.T.S.
NFIGURE 4
Source: City of Orange (2010). Zoning Classification
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 7
2.3 Surrounding Land Uses
To the north of the site are nine detached homes built in the 1960s. To the east is a two-story commercial building with retail and professional offices. To the south, on the south side of East Katella Avenue are two-story multi-tenant commercial buildings. To the west, on the west side of North Cambridge Street is a Speedway Express gas station and convenient store as well as the Cambridge Court apartments.
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project proposes to demolish all on site improvements and construct 49 new paired and detached small lot homes (17 paired and 15 detached) on the 2.71-acre Project site, including four open space and recreation areas and guest parking (Figures 5 and 6). To accommodate this proposal, a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change are requested. The General Plan Amendment would change the land use designation from General Commercial (GC) to Medium Density Residential (MDR). The Zone Change would change the zoning classification from Commercial Professional (C -P) to Multiple -Family Residential (R-3) with application of Small Lot Subdivision Development Standards (OMC 17.14.270).
The proposed community would have a density of 18.1 dwelling units per acre (du/ac), approximately the midpoint of the Medium Density Residential Zone, which provides for densities of 15.1 to 24.0 dwelling unit per acre.
The preliminary unit mix incorporates multiple different floor plans concentrated in three - and four- bedroom configurations ranging from approximately 1,701 to 2,004 square feet. Homes are planned to be 2 and 3-stories, with several floor plans also offering a roof deck, and a maximum height of 35 feet.
Along the northern property boundary, adjacent to existing single -family homes, the Project proposes twelve (12) single family detached homes , all of which are two -story homes (Figures 7 through 13).
Table 1 summarizes the proposed floor plans.
Table 1. Floor Plan Summary
Plan # of
Units
Square
Footage
Stories Garage
Count
Bedrooms Bathrooms Garage
Storage
SFD
Plan 2 1 2,004
SF
3-story 2-car 4 bdrm 3.5 bath 250 cu.ft.
Plan 2X
(Roof
Deck)
2 2,001
SF
3-story
+ roof
deck
2-car 4 bdrm 3.5 bath 250 cu.ft.
Plan 3 12 1,701
SF
2-story 2-car 3 bdrm 2.5 bath 250 cu.ft.
Duplex
Building 1
Plan 1 7 1,984
SF
3-story 2-car 3 bdrm 3.5 bath 250 cu.ft.
Plan 2 4 2,004
SF
3-story 2-car 4 bdrm 3.5 bath 250 cu.ft.
Plan 2 Alt 3 2,004
SF
3-story 2-car 3 bdrm 3.5 bath 250 cu.ft.
Duplex
Building 2
(Roof
Deck)
Plan 1X
(Roof
Deck)
10 1,965
SF
3-story
+ roof
deck
2-car 3 bdrm 3.5 bath 250 cu.ft.
Plan 2X
(Roof
Deck)
10 2,001
SF
3-story
+ roof
deck
2-car 4 bdrm 3.5 bath 250 cu.ft.
A 1.0
N o r t h
Original Scale :
1"= 30'
Site Summary:
Total Homes : 49
Site Area : ± 2.71 Acres
Density : ± 18.1 Homes/Acre
Parking Required*:
2.0 Spaces / 3BR x 31 : 62
3.0 Spaces / 4BR x 18 : 54
0.25 Spaces / Unit x 49 : 12.25
Total Required : 128.25 = 128 (2.61:1)
*Note: Parking required per Small Lot Subdivision parking standards
Parking Provided:
Garage Spaces : 98
Uncovered Spaces : 30
Total Provided : 128
Overall Parking Ratio : 2.6:1
Land Use:
Existing : General Commercial (CG)
Proposed : Medium Density Residential (R3)
Zoning:
Existing : Commercial Professional (C-P)
Proposed : Medium Density Residential (R3)
with Application of Small Lot Sub-
division Development Standards
(OMC 17.14.270)
Orange, California
1 0 . 2 5 . 2 3Copyright 2023 Bassenian | Lagoni Architects Note:
This yield study is for the purpose of estimating the maximum density of a residential product type on a site of a given configuration. If specific entitlement requirements differ from the criteria shown on the plan (such as setbacks, minimum lot sizes, street standards, retention requirements, etc.) then the actual possible density may vary substantially. 2031 Orchard Drive, Suite 100
tel. +1 949 553 9100
fax +1 949 553 0548
Newport Beach, CA USA 92660
0 30 6015
SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"
N
o
r t h
C a m b r i d g e S t r e e t
Proposed 8' Screen/Retaining Wall
Existing ±7' Block Wall to Remain
Primary Entry
3-Story Duplex, typical
Existing AT&T Easement
w/ Equipment
Existing SCE
Guy Wire
Existing SCE Vent Pipes
Existing Neighbors
All Single Story
3' ROW Dedication
Fire Truck Turning
Template, typical
Pocket Park
Pocket Park
4" Rolled Curb
Existing Building
±20,800 SF
Typical Parking Space Detail
N.T.S.
FIGURE 5
Source: Bassenian|Lagoni Conceptual Site Plan
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19253
PLANNING LAND USE APPLICATION NO. 0051-22, SMALL LOT ORDINANCE 901 EAST KATELLA AVENUE
CITY OF ORANGE, COUNTY OF ORANGE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PLAN SET:
DATE:
0 1" = 30'
15 30 60
N.T.S.
FIGURE 6
Source: C&V Consulting Tentative Tract Map
Key Map
901 E. Katella Ave
ORANGE, CA
1750 DEERE AVE, SANTA ANA, CA 92705
O 949.250.4822 www.landconcern.com
Conceptual Open and Private Space Plan
L-22
0 8 16 32
SCALE: 1” = 16’
October 25, 2023
Katella Elevation
K
C
Cambridge Elevation
Plan 2A
Lot 35
Plan 1B
Lot 36
Plan 1A
Lot 38
Plan 2A
Lot 39
Plan 1B
Lot 40
Plan 1B
Lot 44
Plan 1A
Lot 42
Plan 1A
Lot 46
Plan 1B
Lot 48
Plan 2B
Lot 41
Plan 2B
Lot 45
Plan 2A
Lot 43
Plan 2A
Lot 47
Plan 2B
Lot 49
Plan 3B
Lot 1
Plan 2B
Lot 37
Katella Elevation (continue below left)
Katella Elevation continued
N.T.S.
FIGURE 7
Source: Land Concern Proposed Elevations -Katella and Cambridge N.T.S.
FIGURE 8
Source: Bassenian|Lagoni Proposed Elevations -Street Scene and Plan 2 Plan 2
N.T.S.
FIGURE 9
Source: Bassenian|Lagoni Proposed Elevations - Plan 2A and 2B Plan 2A
Plan 2B
N.T.S.
FIGURE 10
Source: Bassenian|Lagoni Proposed Elevations - Building I and IA Building I
Building IA
N.T.S.
FIGURE 11
Source: Bassenian|Lagoni Proposed Elevations - Building IB Building IB
N.T.S.
FIGURE 12
Source: Bassenian|Lagoni Proposed Elevations - Plan 3 SFD and 3A Plan 3 SFD
Plan 3A
N.T.S.
FIGURE 13
Source: Bassenian|Lagoni Proposed Elevations - Plan 3 B Plan 3B
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 17
All homes along the north property line have a 10-foot rear yard setback consistent with the Small Lot Subdivision Development Standards.
Eleven homes (5 paired and one detached) will face out onto East Katella Avenue creating “eyes on the street” and providing an interesting building articulation along the street frontage. Th e Project includes a 10-foot setback along East Katella Avenue consistent with the Small Lot Subdivision Development Standards.
Vehicle access would occur at an entry along North Cambridge Street, generally in the same location as the existing access, and along East Katella Avenue, at the southeast portion of the site. The Project is not proposed to be gated. The two access points will be widened from the current 27 -foot commercial driveway apron to a 39-foot-wide drive apron consistent with Standard Plan 115.
Each dwelling unit is planned with a side -by-side two car garage. No individual driveways in front of garages are proposed. The garage spaces total 98 covered spaces. The site plan provides for 30 uncovered guest parking spaces. The site plan provide s a total of 128 parking spaces, which represents a parking ratio of 2.6 spaces per residential unit. The interior loop drive aisle measures 25-feet in width.
Sewer, domestic water, and storm drainage for the Project would be served from existing public services located in East Katella Avenue and Cambridge Street. The domestic water main along the Project frontage of East Katella Avenue and Cambridge Street will be upgraded from a 6-inch line to an 8-inch line. All work would occur within the existing stre ets. Dry utility service would be accessed from available existing electrical, gas, CATV and telephone providers currently serving the site and area. The existing above -ground electrical lines on Cambridge Street would remain and not be modified. The existing sidewalks, street trees, and bus stop along the Project site frontage would also remain and not be modified, except to accommodate the modified ingress/egress access to the Project site.
The existing block wall fencing will remain along the northern property boundary. A new block wall, partially retaining, is proposed along the eastern Project boundaries. The wall measures 8 feet in height.
Open space areas total approximately 18,357 square feet. A pocket park area is proposed along the northern property boundary, consisting of a seating area, BBQ, shaded picnic tables, multipurpose lawn area, landscaping, and enhanced paving. An open space feature with landscaping and walkways is proposed at the corner of Cambridge Street and East Katella Avenue. Th is area includes bench seating, entry portals, signage wall, landscaping, and lawn area. A central east-west extending paseo is proposed in the center of the Project site. Lastly, landscape areas are proposed in the northwest corner of the Project site, no rth of the entry off Cambridge Street and near the eastern entry drive to East Katella Avenue (Figure 14). The common open space areas would be owned and maintained by a newly formed homeowner’s association.
Construction of the Project would begin with demolition of the existing building, walls, and parking areas. All material would be hauled off site and to the extent possible taken to a recycling facility. The Project site would be graded, which includes the removal and recompaction of the upper three to fifteen feet depending on the underlying soil conditions. Grading will occur in a single phase and require import of approximately 1,000 cubic yards of fill dirt.
Runoff will be conveyed by concrete v -gutters and an onsite area drain system, collected by two (2) onsite catch basins and routed to the proposed Biofiltration vault treatment device. The flows in excess City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 18
of the 25 -year storm event will enter the stormwater sump pump which outlets onto Cambridge Street through a parkway drain.
Trash storage will occur as individual carts stored within the enclosed garage of each dwelling unit.
3.1 Intended Use of the IS/MND
The Project proposes the following entitlements:
• General Plan Amendment No. 0004-22 - General Commercial (GC) to Medium Density Residential (MDR)
• Zone Change No. 1307-22 - Commercial Professional (C-P) to Multiple-Family Residential (R- 3)
• Tentative Tract Map No. 0051-22
• Major Site Plan Review No. 1111-22
• Design Review No. 5092-22
• Application of Small Lot Subdivision Development Standards (OMC 17.14.270)
3.2 Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required (Responsible or Trustee Agencies):
• South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
3.3 Scheduled Public Meetings or Hearings:
• DRC Meeting December 6, 2023
901 E. Katella Ave
ORANGE, CA
1750 DEERE AVE, SANTA ANA, CA 92705
O 949.250.4822 www.landconcern.com L-2October 25, 2023 0 8 16 32
SCALE: 1” = 16’
Landscape Key
1 COMMUNITY ENTRY
2 42”HT. COURTYARD WALLS: STUCCO
FINISH TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE.
• PRIVATE PATIOS WITH CONCRETE
PAVING3
POCKET PARK
• SEATING AREA
• SHADED PICNIC TABLES
• BBQ
• ENHANCED PAVING
• LAWN
4 PASEO
5 PRIVATE PATIOS W/ CONCRETE PAVING
6 CORNER POCKET PARK
• BENCH SEATING
• ENTRY PORTALS
• LAWN
7 PRIVATE YARD
8 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN
9 SIGNAGE WALL
10 ROLLED CURB AND LOW VEGETATION
11 SCREENING HEDGE AT PARKING
Notes
• All landscape areas shall be irrigated by an automatic irrigation system all the trees be irrigated via separate, dedicated bubbler circuits all other landscape areas
shall be irrigated via a drip irrigation system. The
entire irrigation system shall be on an automatically
controlled system with a separate programs capable of
irrigating each hydrozone independently. The intent of
the landscape and water delivery systems is to meet all aspects of the City of Orange water efficiency landscape ordinance.
• All planting areas are to be covered with 3” of mulch.
Tree Palette
SYMBOL NAME SIZE QUANTITY WUCOLS
-- REFER TO CONCEPTUAL PLANTING PLANS, SHEET L-24 OF THIS SET -- 1 7 7
4 4
10 11
1 10
2 2
3 6
9 8
8 E. KATELLA AVE
N. CAMBRIDGE ST.
N.T.S.
FIGURE 14
Source: Bassenian|Lagoni Proposed Landscaping
City of Orange
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
D Aesthetics
D Agriculture & Forest Resources
� Air Quality
� Biological Resources
� Cultural Resources
D Energy
� Geology I Soils
D Greenhouse Gas Emissions
4.1 DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
� Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
D Hydrology/ Water Quality
D Land Use/ Planning
D Mineral Resources
� Noise
D Population / Housing
D Public Services
D Recreation
� Transportation / Traffic
� Tribal Cultural Resources
D Utilities / Service Systems
0 Wildfire
� Mandatory Findings of
Significance
D I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be re ared.
� I find that although. the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made or agreed to by the roject ro onent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be re ared.
D I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is re uired.
D I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
DI find that although. the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are im osed u on the ro osed ro • ect, nothin further is re uired.
Signature Date
901 E. Katella Residential Project JS1/MND Page 2O
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 21
SECTION 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
5.1 Aesthetics
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) In nonurbanized areas, substantially degrade the
existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those
that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage
point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Impact Analysis
The Project site constitutes a n infill site currently developed with an abandoned commercial building and wireless community facility. The Project site has had a history of vandalism, homelessness, and small fires.
The Project site is not located on a ridgeline or an area of visual prominence. There are no rock outcroppings or other unique geologic features. The few trees on the Project site are common to the area.
The City’s General Plan EIR (Section 5.1.1) defines scenic vi sta as “a viewpoint that provides expansive views of a highly valued landscape for the benefit of the general public.” (OGP EIR, p.
5.1-1) While there are a number of scenic vistas within Orange, the Project site does not have the elements to meet the definition of scenic vista.
The City’s General Plan EIR (Section 5.1.1) defines scenic resources as “those landscape patterns and features that are visually or aesthetically pleasing and that, therefore, contribute affirmatively to the definition of a distinc t community or region including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings.” (OGP EIR, p. 5.1-1) The Project site does not contain visual or aesthetically pleasing resources and the existing abandoned building on the Project site is not historic nor does it contribute architectural value.
Several City roadways have scenic qualities and are designated as viewscape corridors by the County of Orange. Viewscape corridors are defined as routes that traverse a corridor within which City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 22
unique or unusual scenic resources and aesthetic values are found. Viewscape corridors include portions of Jamboree Road, Santiago Canyon Road, and Newport Boulevard. The planning area does not contain any County -designated landscape corridors. SR -91, just north of and outside of the planning area, is an officially designated state scenic highway.
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less than Significant. The Project site does not represent a scenic vista. The Project site is developed with an abandoned commercial use.
The Project site is not located near any designated scenic highways, significant ridgelines, or other identified scenic resources, and would not result in any impacts related to having an adverse impact on a scenic vista. The closest scenic highway to the Project site is the SR -91 located north and outside of the City.
Since the proposed Project site does not contain a scenic vista or scenic resources, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Less than Significant. The Project site does not contain scenic resources. The Project site is developed with an abandoned commercial use. The Project site is not located near any designated scenic highways, significant ridgelines, or other identified scenic resources, and would not result in any impacts related to having an adverse impact on a scenic vista. The closest scenic highway to the Project site is the SR-91 located north and outside of the City.
Since the proposed Project site does not contain scenic resources, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
c) In nonurbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Less than Significant. The Project site is located in an urban area of Orange. The Project site is located along a major arterial roadway and surrounded by residential and commercial uses. Therefore, the applicable threshold of significance is whether the proposed Project would conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality.
The proposed Project requests approval of a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from General Commercial (GC) to Medium Density Residential (MDR). A Zone City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 23
Change is also requested to change the zoning classification from Commercial Professional (C-P) to Multiple-Family Residential (R-3).
The City’s General Plan Natural Resources Element includes a number of policies that pertain to visual and aesthetic resources (OGP, page NR-8). Below are the policies a nd a discussion on the proposed Project’s consistency.
Goal 7.0: Protect significant view corridors, open space, and ridgelines within the urban environment.
The Project site is not located along a view corridor, does not contain existing open space, and the site is flat without ridgelines or significant views of ridgelines. The proposed Project is consistent with this goal.
Policy 7.1: Preserve the scenic nat ure of significant ridgelines visible throughout the community.
The Project site is flat and does not contain a significant ridgeline. Furthermore, re -development of the Project site would not impact views of significant ridgelines. The proposed Project is consistent with this policy.
Policy 7.2: Designate Santiago Canyon Road east of Jamboree Road as a City Scenic Highway to preserve the scenic nature of the open space adjacent to the road.
The Project site is not located along Santiago Canyon Road, and re-development of the Project site would not impede the designation of Santiago Canyon Road as a scenic highway. The proposed Project is consistent with this policy.
Policy 7.3: Encourage the development of landscaped medians and parkway landscaping along arterial streets in public and private projects, and encourage the state to provide freeway landscaping.
The Project site is located along East Katella Avenue, an arterial roadway within the City. The proposed Project includes landscaping and architectural design along the frontage of East Katella Avenue. The design of the proposed Project is consistent with this policy.
Policy 7.4: Coordinate with Southern California Edison and other utilities to place utility lines underground wherever possible.
Existing above-ground transmission (22.5 kv) electric lines extend along the Cambridge Street frontage to the corner of Cambridge Street and East Katella Avenue. The electric lines turn west along East Katella Avenue away from the Project site. Because the transmission lines occur along a short distance of the Project frontage and turn away from the Project site along East Katella, undergrounding along the short Project frontage is not feasible. Therefore, the above -ground transmission lines will remain. The proposed Project is consistent with this policy.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 24
Policy 7.5 Encourage the retention and enhancement of scenic corridors and visual focal points within the community.
The Project site is neither along a scenic corridor nor a visual focal point within t he community.
The re-development of the Project site from an abandoned commercial use to residential uses with extensive landscaping and strong architectural features will be a visual improvement to the Project site. The proposed Project is consistent with this policy.
Since the proposed Project is consistent with the visual resource policies included in the General Plan and will result in a visual improvement to the Project site, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less than Significant. The Project site is located in a n urban area with numerous nearby light sources. The existing development of the Project site includes wall - mounted lighting, security lighting, and parking lot lighting. Existing light sources surrounding the Project site include streetlights, existing residential neighborhoods, and existing commercial uses. The Project would include light sources typical of residential developments, which are less intensive than the surrounding commercial property lighting. Internal roadways would have streetlights and each residence would have typical wall lighting ass ociated with residential uses.
The light sources included in the proposed Project have the same character and intensity as existing surrounding light sources, therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
Sources: City of Orange General Plan EIR, Section 5.1; City of Orange General Plan Natural Resources Element, page NR-8; Google Earth and site visits; and Engineering plans.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 25
5.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES.
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in
assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In
determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are signifi cant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest
Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon
measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols
adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non -agricultural
use?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code
Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public
Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as def ined by Government
Code Section 51104(g))?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment
which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non -agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Impact Analysis
The Project site is developed with an existing approximately 20,621 square foot abandoned commercial building used for communications, a parking area of approximately 152 parking stalls, and an approximately 53 -foot-tall wireless communication pole and associated utility boxes and equipment. The Project site is not being actively farmed or used for forest use and there is no recent history of such uses on the Project site.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 26
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non -agricultural use? No Impact. The Project site is not designated Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance based on mapping by the Department of Conservation. The Project site is mapped as “Urban and Built-Up Land.”
Significance Determination: No Impact
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. The Project site is not subject to a Williamson Act contract.
Significance Determination: No Impact
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? No Impact. The Project site is zoned for commercial development. While the proposed Project includes a request for a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change, the request does not include rezoning of agricultural or forest land. No impact would occur.
Significance Determination: No Impact
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact.
The Project site does not have forest land or land that was used for the harvesting of timber.
Significance Determination: No Impact
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact
e) Involve other changes in the existing environme nt which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? No Impact. Existing properties surrounding the Project site consist of residential and commercial uses. There are no properties designed as prime farmland or forest uses within proximity to the Project site. Therefore, the proposed Project would not encroach into designated Prime Farmland or forest land and the proposed Project would not influence existing designated Prime Farmland or forest land to convert into non -agricultural or non-forest uses. No impact would occur.
Significance Determination: No Impact
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 27
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact
Sources: Department of Conservation Important Farmland Finder, DLRP Important Farmland Finder (ca.gov); Title Report; City of Orange General Plan Land Use Map; City of Orange Zoning Map; and Google Earth.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 28
5.3 Air Quality
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of
the applicable air quality plan? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
non-attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to
odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of
people?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Impact Analysis
The proposed Project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin, for which the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD ) is responsible for controlling emissions primarily from stationary sources and to a lesser extent, mobile sources. Additionally, AQMD, in coordination with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is responsible for creating, updating, and implementing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), which is a regional air quality strategy program. While air quality has improved dramatically over the past years, the South Coast Air Basin continues to exceed federal public health standards for ozone and particulate matter (PM).
The City of Orange relies on the SCAQMD for establishing significance thresholds for criteria air pollutants. By complying with the thresholds of significance, the Project would also be in compliance with the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) and the federal and state air quality standards.
Table 2. SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds
Pollutant Construction (Lbs /Day) Operation (Lbs/Day)
NOX 100 55
VOC 75 55
PM10 150 150
PM2.5 55 55
SOX 150 150
CO 550 550
Source:http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality- significancethresholds.pdf
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 29
Furthermore, Localized Significance Thresholds (LST) are used to determine whether a project may generate significant adverse localized air quality impacts. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. LSTs are developed based on the ambient concentrations of four applicable air pollutants for source receptor area (SRA) 17 – Central Orange County. Table 3, below, provides the LST threshold of significance developed by AQMD.
Table 3. SCAQMD Localized Significance Thresholds (LST) Pollutant Construction (Lbs /Day) Operation (Lbs/Day)
NOX 107.3 107.3
CO 672.7 672.7
PM10 5.9 1.6
PM2.5 3.9 1.1
Source: SCAQMD Mass Rate Localized Significance Thresholds for a 1.9-acre site in SRA-17 at 25 meters
The report, 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Development Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study, City of Orange, California , dated September 5, 2023, and prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc. (Appendix A), analyzes potential air quality impacts from construction and operations of the proposed Project. The report analyzes grading the Project site, including the import of approximately 962 cubic yards of fill material and the demolition of the existing structure and parking lot . The report also analyzes operational impa cts from construction of 49 dwelling units.
The analysis of air quality impacts included in the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study assumes implementation of standard air quality rules and requirements and design features designed to reduce emissions. These commitments are defined as Project Design Features (PDFs), which will be included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program as PDFs to ensure implementation. The following PDFs were included in the air quality analysis and are hereby incorporated into the Project.
Construction Design Features:
PDF AQ-1 The project must follow the standard SCAQMD rules and requirements with regards to fugitive dust control, which include, but are not limited to the following:
1. All active construction areas shall be watered two (2) times daily.
2. Speed on unpaved roads shall be reduced to less than 15 mph.
3. Any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway shall be swept or washed at the site access points within 30 minutes.
4. Any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material shall be covered or watered twice daily.
5. All operations on any unpaved surface shall be suspended if winds exceed 15 mph.
6. Access points shall be washed or swept daily.
7. Construction sites shall be sandbagged for erosion control.
8. Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers’ specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or more).
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 30
9. Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials, and maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard space in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 23114.
10. Use gravel aprons and track out grates at all truck exits.
11. Replace the ground cover of disturbed areas as quickly as possible.
PDF AQ-2 All diesel construction equipment should have Tier 4 low emission “clean diesel” engines (OEM or retrofit) that include diesel oxidation catalysts and diesel particulate filters that meet the latest CARB best available control technology.
PDF AQ-3 Construction equipment should be maintained in proper tune.
PDF AQ-4 All construction vehicles should be prohibited from excessive idling. Excessive idling is defined as five (5) minutes or longer.
PDF AQ-5 Minimize the simultaneous operation of multiple construction equipment units, to the maximum extent feasible.
PDF AQ-6 The use of heavy construction equipment and earthmoving activity should be suspended during Air Alerts when the Air Quality Index reaches the “Unhealthy” level.
PDF AQ-7 Establish an electricity supply to the construction site and use electric powered equipment instead of diesel-powered equipment or generators, where feasible.
PDF AQ-8 Establish staging areas for the construction equipment t hat are as far from adjacent residential homes, as feasible.
PDF AQ-9 Use haul trucks with on-road engines instead of off-road engines for on-site hauling.
Operational Design Features:
PDF AQ-10 The project must comply with the mandatory requirements of the California Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 6 (Energy Code) and Part 11 (CALGreen), including, but not limited to:
• Install low -flow fixtures and toilets, water -efficient irrigation systems, drought tolerant/native landscaping, and reduce the amount of turf. • Provide the necessary infrastructure to support electric vehicle charging. • Provide solar installations (or other sources of on-site renewable energy) per the prescribed Energy Design Ratings.
PDF AQ-11 Participate in the local waste management recycling and composting programs.
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less than Significant. The Project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin, which includes all of City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 31
Orange County and portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. Air quality within the Basin is under the jurisdiction of the SCAQMD. The SCAQMD adopted the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP) in March 2017.
Consistency with the 2016 AQMP for the Basin would be achieved if a Project is consistent with the goals, objectives, and assumptions in the respective plan to achieve the federal and state air quality standards. One such plan is the General Plan, which determines land use and land use intensity. The City of Orange General Plan designates the land use on the Project site as commercial. The Project proposes a General Plan Amendment to residential. While the proposed Project is not consistent with the land use designation assumed in the AQMP, the AQMP assumed development of the Project site as commercial, with associated emissions. Therefore, consistency with the AQMP is determined by whether the proposed Project exceeds SCAQMD daily emissions thresholds. As detailed in Sections b), c), and d) below, emissions generated by the proposed Project would be below emissions thresholds established by SCAQMD. Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent with, and would not conflict with or obstruct, implementation of the AQMP. Impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Less than Significant. Criteria pollutant emissions from the proposed Project would be generated by both construction emissions and operational emissions. As shown in Table 4 below, the daily construction emissions would be less than the SCAQMD air quality standards and thresholds of significance.
Table 4. Daily Construction Emissions
Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day)1
Activity VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Demolition 1.54 16.31 14.50 0.03 2.03 0.90
Site Preparation 1.33 14.30 10.03 0.03 1.24 0.59
Grading 1.39 16.45 9.66 0.03 3.71 1.98
Building Construction 1.88 14.13 15.91 0.03 1.25 0.76
Paving 1.07 8.13 12.14 0.02 0.56 0.41
Architectural Coating 33.61 1.24 2.10 0.00 0.17 0.09
Maximum1 33.61 16.45 15.91 0.03 3.71 1.98
SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Threshold (?) No No No No No No
1 Maximum daily emission during summer or winter; includes both on-site and off-site Proposed Project emissions.
Table 5 below summarizes the analysis of operational emissions. As shown in Table 5, operational emissions would also be below the SCAQMD thresholds.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 32
Table 5. Daily Operational Emissions
Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day)1
Activity VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Mobile Sources 1.24 1.20 12.57 0.03 3.29 0.89
Energy Sources 0.03 0.22 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.02
Area Sources 1.36 0.91 4.66 0.01 0.09 0.09
Stationary Source 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 2.63 2.33 17.32 0.04 3.40 1.00
SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Threshold (?) No No No No No No
1 Maximum daily emission during summer or winter; includes both on-site and off-site Proposed Project emissions.
With implementation of the Project Design Features (PDFs) , the proposed Project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors). Therefore, impacts from criteria pollutant emissions would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less than Significant.
Sensitive receptors surrounding the Project site include neighboring residential uses. Exposure of pollutant concentrations on sensitive receptors can occur from construction and operation of the proposed Project. While project construction would generate less than significant criteria pollutant emissions, construction operations could cause fugitive dust impacts and impacts from diesel particulate matter. Operation of the proposed Project could also result in localized concentration of emissions.
Localized Significance Thresholds (LST) are used to determine whether a project may generate significant adverse localized air quality impacts. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. LSTs are developed based on the ambient concentrations of four applicable air pollutants for source receptor area (SRA) 17 – Central Orange County.
With implementation of the PDFs, localized construction and operational emis sions are summarized in the following tables.
Table 6. Construction Localized Emissions
•
• Emissions Sources
Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day)1
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
• On-Site Emissions 14.47 14.21 3.31 1.87
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 33
•
• Emissions Sources
Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day)1
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
• SCAQMD Threshold2 107.3 672.7 5.9 3.9
• Exceed Threshold? No No No No
1Maximum daily emission during summer or winter; includes on-site project emissions only. 2Reference 2006-2008 SCAQMD Mass Rate Localized Significant Thresholds for construction and operation. SRA- 17, Central Orange County, 2-acre site, receptor distance 25 meters.
Table 7. Operational Localized Emissions
•
• Emissions Sources
Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day)1
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
• On-Site Emissions2 1.19 5.38 0.3 0.2
• SCAQMD Threshold3 107.3 672.7 1.6 1.1
• Exceed Threshold? No No No No
1 Maximum daily emission in summer or winter.
2 Mobile source emissions include on-site vehicle emissions only. It is estimated that approximately 5% of mobile emissions will occur on the project site.
3 Reference: 2006 -2008 SCAQMD Mass Rate Localized Significant Thresholds for construction and operati on Table C-1 through C -6; SRA 17, Central Orange County disturbance area of 2 acre and receptor distance of 25 meters.
As shown in the prior tables, emissions from the proposed Project would not exceed localized significance thresholds (LSTs) for the nearest sensitive receptors for construction and operational emissions. Therefore, impacts are less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Less than Significant. Substantial odor-generating sources include land uses such as agricultural activities, feedlots, wastewater treatment facilities, landfills, or heavy manufacturing uses. The proposed Project does not include any of these uses that result in significant odor impacts. Some objectionable odors may occur during construction from diesel engines, paving, an d architectural coatings/paint. However, these odors are temporary, limited only to specific construction activities, and dissipate quickly. Since residential uses do not typically generate objectionable odors and the Project site is surrounded by existing residential uses on all sides, no new objectionable odors would be created. Impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
Sources: 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Development Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study, City of Orange, California , dated September 5, 2023, and prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc. (Appendix A).
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 34
5.4 Biological Resources
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to,
marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other
means?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Impact Analysis
Biological resources on the Project site were evaluated and presented in Biological Resources Assessment for 901 E. Katella Project in the City of Orange, dated November 14, 2022, by Carlson Strategic Land Solutions, and included in Appendix B. The Project site is classified as entirely developed. Non-native vegetation consists of variegated agave ( Agave americana ‘Variegata’ ), glossy privet (Ligustrum lucidum), creeping juniper (Juniperus horizontalis). Trees located on site include jacaranda (Jacaranda mimosifolia), Chinese elm (Ulmus parvifolia), and Silk Floss trees (Ceiba speciosa). No blue line drainages or drainages that qualify as jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State were identified on the Project site.
The Project site is not located within the Orange County NCCP/HCP.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 35
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fis h and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. No special status plant or wildlife species were identified on the Project site, nor were any observed offsite within the buffer area. The proposed Projec t includes the removal of all buildings, ornamental trees and shrubs, and the parking lot area. Since the project site does not contain special status plant or wildlife species, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required.
The Project site consists of developed habitat and lacks suitable habitat for sensitive wildlife species. The Project site provides limited suitable habitat for some common avian species in the form of ornamental species and existing building eaves. While none of the common species carry a Federal or State listing as threatened or endangered, they are all protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Therefore, a pre-construction survey is required in compliance with the MBTA. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM BIO -1 would reduce potential impacts to the avian species to a less than significant level, if nesting individuals are present.
With implementation of Mitigation Measure MM BIO -1 impacts to sensitive wildlife species would be mitigated to less than significant.
Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:
Mitigation Measure MM BIO -1: Prior to ground disturbances that would impact potentially suitable nesting habitat for avian species, the project applicant shall adhere to the following:
1. Vegetation removal activities shall be scheduled outside the nesting season (September 1 to February 14 for songbirds; September 1 to January 14 for raptors) to the extent feasible to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds and/or ground nesters.
2. Any construction activities that occur during typical nesting season (February 15 to August 31 for songbirds; January 15 to August 31 for raptors) will require that all suitable habitat, on-site and within 300-feet surrounding the site (as feasible), be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist before commencement ground disturbances.
If active nests are identified, the biologist would establish buffers around the vegetation (500 feet for raptors and sensitive species, 200 feet for non -raptors/non-sensitive species). All work within these buffers would be halted until the nesting effort is finished (i.e. the juveniles are surviving in dependent from the nest). The onsite biologist would review and verify compliance with these nesting boundaries and would verify the nesting effort has finished.
Work can resume within these areas when no other active nests are found. Alternatively, a qualified biologist may determine that construction can be permitted within the buffer areas and would develop a monitoring plan to prevent any impacts while the nest continues to be active (eggs, chicks, etc.). Upon completion of the survey and any follow -up construction avoidance management, a report shall be prepared and submitted to City for mitigation monitoring compliance record keeping.
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 36
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. No riparian habitat or jurisdictional features occur on the Project site that meet the definition and are considered jurisdictional Waters of the United States or Waters of the State, pursuant to Section 1600-1603 of the California Fish and Game Code and Se ction 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, respectively. Therefore, no impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required.
Significance Determination: No Impact
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. No jurisdictional non -wetland or wet land waters regulated under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act occur on the Project site. Therefore, no impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required.
Significance Determination: No Impact
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project site is surrounded by existing residential and commercial development and is located at the corner of a busy intersection. The Project site does not function as a wildlife corridor.
The Project site provides limited suitable habitat for some common avian species in the form of ornamental species and existing building eaves. While not considered a wildlife corridor, the potential exists for avian species to nest on the Project site. Nesting activity typically occurs from January 15 through August 31 for raptors and February 15 through August 31 for all other avian species. Disturbing or destroying active nests is a violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.). In addition, nests and eggs are protected under Fish and Wildlife Code Section 3503. As such, direct impacts to breeding birds (e.g. through nest removal) or indirect impacts (e.g. by noise causing abandonment of the nest) is considered a potential ly significant impact. Compliance with the MBTA through Mitigation Measure MM BIO-1would reduce impacts to a less than significant level.
Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: Implement MM BIO-1.
Mitigation Measure MM BIO -1: Prior to ground disturbances that would impact potentially suitable nesting habitat for avian species, the project applicant shall adhere to the following:
1. Vegetation removal activities shall be scheduled outside the nesting season (September 1 to February 14 for songbirds; September 1 to January 14 for raptors) to the extent feasible to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds and/or ground nesters.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 37
2. Any construction activities that occur during typical nesting season (February 15 to August 31 for songbirds; January 15 to August 31 for raptors) will require that all suitable habitat, on-site and within 300-feet surrounding the site (as feasible), be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist before commencement ground disturbances.
If active nests are identified, the biologist would establish buffers around the vegetation (500 feet for raptors and sensitive species, 200 feet for non -raptors/non-sensitive species). All work within these buffers would be halted until the nesting effort is finished (i.e. the juveniles are surviving independent from the nest). The onsite biologist would review and verify compliance with these nesting boundaries and would verify the nesting effort has finished.
Work can resume withi n these areas when no other active nests are found. Alternatively, a qualified biologist may determine that construction can be permitted within the buffer areas and would develop a monitoring plan to prevent any impacts while the nest continues to be active (eggs, chicks, etc.). Upon completion of the survey and any follow -up construction avoidance management, a report shall be prepared and submitted to City for mitigation monitoring compliance record keeping.
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated.
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Less than Significant. The City of Orange has a tree preservation ordinance, which regulates the removal of trees from undeveloped and public interest properties. The Project site is neither undeveloped nor considered a public interest property.
Therefore, the City’s tree preservation ordinance does not apply to the Project site. The Project site currently contains minimal ornamental trees along the frontages. New landscaping, including street trees and on-site trees is proposed with the Project. Impacts are considered less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The Project site is not mapped within the boundary of the Orange County Natural Communities Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) . Therefore, no impact would occur.
Significance Determination: No Impact
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact
Sources: Biological Resources Assessment for 901 E. Katella Project in the City of Orange, dated November 14, 2022, by Carlson Strategic Land Solutions, and included in Appendix B.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 38
5.5 Cultural Resources
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Impact Analysis
The potential for cultural resources to occur on the Project site was assessed in the Cultural Resources Study for the 901 East Katella Avenue Project, City of Orange, Orange County California, prepared by BFSA Environmental Services, dated September 7, 2023, and included in Appendix C. The analysis included a review of archaeological records at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton. A Sacred Lands File (SLF) search was also requested from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Additionally, a field survey was also conducted of the Project site.
The Project site was previously developed with a commercial building that is older than 50 years.
Given its age, the structure was assessed by an arc hitectural historian. The building was constructed between 1970 and 1972 and first used by Pacific Telephone Company of San Ana and later AT&T. The style of the building was influenced by International-style architecture.
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? Less than Significant. The Project site was developed in the early 1970’s with a commercial/office building, which was first used by Pacific Telephone Company of San Ana and later AT&T. The style of the building was influenced by International -style architecture.
International style architecture was a major world -wide architectural trend of the 1920s and 30s and reflects the formative decades of Modernism prior to World War II. (BFS A, p. 3.0 -7) Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, the building was assessed to determine the historical significance of the structure. The California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) eligibility criteria were used to determine if the build ing is eligible for listing and thus, the building’s historical significance.
To be eligible for listing on the CRHR, the resource must be found significant under one or more of the following criteria:
• CRHR Criterion 1: It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage.
• CRHR Criterion 2: It is associated with the lives of persons important in our past.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 39
• CRHR Criterion 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction; represents the work of an important creative individual; or possesses high artistic values.
• CRHR Criterion 4: It has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.
The evaluation of the four CRHR criteria are presented in the Cultural Resources Study for the 901 East Katella Avenue Project, City of Orange, Orange County California , prepared by BFSA Environmental Services, dated September 7, 2023, and included in Appendix C. The analysis determined the existing building is a common example of early 1970’s office/commercial buildings possessing limited integrity. While influenced by the International Style architecture, the building is not a very good example and not considered architecturally important. The building is not associated with any significant events or individuals and is not likely to provide any information important to the history of the region. Therefore, the existing structure is not considered a historical resource and impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? Less than Significant. The records search from SCCIC indicated that three resources, all historic in age, are located within a one-mile radius of the Project site. Additionally, a field survey was conducted of the Project site. However, no records indicate pre-historic resources on the Project site and the field survey did not identify any evidence of resources on the Project site. An SLF search was also requested from NAHC to identify any sacred sites or locations of religious or ceremonial importance on or near the Project site. The search did not identify any tribal resources on or near the Project site.
Given the disturbed nature of the Project s ite resulting from previous agricultural use and development of the property, and that no prehistoric resources have ever been recorded within the vicinity of the Project site, the likelihood that archaeological deposits are present within the Project site is very low and impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less than Significant. No conditions exist that suggest human remains are likely to be found on the Project site. However, if human remains are found, those remains would be required to conduct proper treatment, in accordance with applicable laws. State of California Public Resources Health and Safety Code Sections 7050.5 to 7055 describe the general provisions for human remains.
Specifically, Health and Safety Code Section 70 50.5 describes the requirements if any human remains are accidentally discovered during excavation of a site. As required by State law, the City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 40
requirements and procedures set forth in Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code would be implemented, including notification of the County Coroner, notification of the NAHC and consultation with the individual identified by the NAHC to be the “most likely descendant (MLD).” The MLD would have 48 hours to make recommendations to landowners for the disposition of any Native American human remains and grave goods found. If human remains are found during excavation, excavation must stop in the vicinity of the find and any area that is reasonably suspected to overlay adjacent remains until the County coroner has been called out, and the remains have been investigated and appropriate recommendations have been made for the treatment and disposition of the remains. Since the treatment of human remains is governed by state law, no mitigation measures are necessary, and impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant Sources: 901 East Katella Avenue Project, City of Orange, Orange County California, prepared by BFSA Environmental Services, dated September 7, 2023, and included in Appendix C.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 41
5.6 Energy
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
ENERGY. Would the project:
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Impact Analysis
An analysis of energy consumption is provided in the report, 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Development Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study, City of Orange, California, dated September 5, 2023, and prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc. (Appendix A). a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Less than Significant. The proposed Project has been designed and would comply with California’s Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6) and Green Building Standards (CALGreen, Title 24, Part 11) to reduce energy consumption . One requirement placed on the Project is the incorporation of solar installations (or other sources of on-site renewable energy) to satisfy the required Energy Design Ratings from the Energy Code. By virtue of compliance with these codes, the proposed Project would not cause wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources and impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Less than Significant. The Project will purchase electricity through Southern California Edison which is subject to the requirements of California Senate Bill 100 ( SB 100). SB 100 is the most stringent and current energy legislation in California; requiring that renewable energy resources and zero -carbon resources supply 100% of retail sales of electricity to California end -use customers and 100% of electricity procu red to serve all state agencies by December 31, 2045. 1 Furthermore, the Project would comply with California’s Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6) and Green Building Standards (CALGreen, Title 24, Part 11) to reduce energy consumption.
Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan, and by virtue of compliance with state and local plans, the proposed Project would not cause wasteful,
1 SB-100 California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 42
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
Sources: 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Development Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study, City of Orange, California, dated September 5, 2023, and prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc. (Appendix A).
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 43
5.7 Geology and Soils
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist -Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
iv) Landslides? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 - 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
Impact Analysis
Geotechnical evaluation of the Project site was initially conducted by Salem Geotechnical Engineering Group in 2019. The Salem investigation included eight (8) exploratory borings to a depth of 50 feet below ground surface (bgs). Salem also conducted percolation testing. In June 2022, GeoTek, Inc. conducted an updated investigation for the proposed Project. The GeoTek investigation included three additional exploratory borings to a depth of 22.5 feet bgs and two percolation test borings. The results of both investigation s are provided in the report, Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation for Proposed 49 -Unit Residential Development, 901 E.
Katella Avenue, City of Orange, Orange County, California , dated June 3, 2022 and prepared by GeoTek, Inc. (Appendix D).
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 44
The Project site is generally flat with site elevations ranging from approximately 223 – 229 feet above mean sea level (MSL) generally descending to the west - southwest. The Project site is mostly underlain by medium dense/stiff to very dense/hard alluvial deposits. There are areas of localized undocumented fill up to 15 feet in thickness. No groundwater was en countered to the boring depth of 50 feet.
Percolation testing was performed to determine infiltration rates. After applying a factor of safety, the infiltration rates range from poor to favorable (0 to 2 inches per hour), depending on location and underlying soil density.
The Project site is not located within a State mapped Earthquake Fault Hazard Zone (Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Zoning Act) or a mapped liquefaction hazard area.
a.i) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Less than Significant. The Project site is not located within an Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone and no faul ts were identified on the site during the geotechnical evaluation conducted by GeoTek, Inc. The closest active fault to the Project site is the Elsinore fault – Whittier Section , which is mapped approximately 7.6 miles north. The possibility of damage due to ground rupture is considered low since no active faults are known to cross the site. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
a.ii) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong seismic ground shaking? Less than Significant. The Project site, like many areas in Southern California, is subject to strong seismic ground shaking.
While the Project site does not have any faults on the property, the closest known active earthquake fault is the Elsinore fault located approximately 7.6 miles north of the Project site, which has the potential to generate strong ground shaking. The Elsinore Fault is capable of producing a magnitude 7 or larger event.
The construction of two and three-story single family residential homes is common in earthquake prone areas like Southern California, including the Project site. The geotechnical analysis included in Appendix D included an evaluation of site seismic characteristics in accordance with the California Building Code (CBC). Based on the site seismic charact eristics, the CBC provides building code guidelines to minimize the effects of seismic ground shaking. With adherence to the building code standards, impacts associated with seismic ground shaking would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 45
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
a.iii) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less than Significant. The Project site does not have earthquake faults on the property, therefore, the potential for seismic rupture is very low. The closest active fault to the Project site is the Elsinore Fault, approximately 7.6 miles north of the Project site. The distance of the Project site to the Elsinore Fault minimizes the risk of fault rupture to less than significant.
The Project site is not located within a liquefaction haza rd zone as mapped by the State of California Seismic Hazard Zone mapping. Given the presence of dense/stiff alluvium and the lack of shallow groundwater, the potential for liquefaction or significant dynamic settlement is negligible, and therefore less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
a.iv) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Landslides? Less than Significant. The Project site and the immediate area consists of generally flat topography, which is not prone to landsliding. Therefore, the potential for landsliding is negligible and impacts would be less than significant.
Secondary types of ground failure that might occur from a large seismic event include ground subsidence, ground lurching, and lateral spreading. Based on the proposed grading and the flat topography across the site, landsliding, g round subsidence and lateral spreading are considered unlikely at the Project site. Ground lurching could occur during a major seismic event, however, the remedial grading described in Section (c) and compliance with the seismic building standards in the California Building Code, would reduce the potential impact to less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less than Significant. The Project site and surrounding properties are essentially flat, without large steep slopes on or adjacent to the property that would be conducive to soil erosion or loss of topsoil. The Project site was previously graded and developed with commercial use. Furthermore, the Project site is surrounded by existing residential and commercial development and arterial roadways. Given current site conditions, the potential for soil erosion or loss of topsoil is low. Furthermore, during grading when the highest risk of loss of topsoil and/or erosion would occur, silt fencing, sandbags, waddles, and other BMPs would be installed as part of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP). Impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 46
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on - or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less than Significant with Mitig ation Incorporated. The Project site is not located on a geologic unit that is unstable or could become unstable. The Project site consists of mostly medium dense/stiff to very dense/hard alluvial deposits. There are areas of localized undocumented fill up to 15 feet in thickness. There are no mapped earthquake faults or landslides. The potential for liquefaction is very low given the underlying dense alluvial deposits and lack of shallow groundwater, and the Project site has very low to low expansive soil potential.
The existing undocumented fills are not suitable in its current state to support the construction of new structures and infrastructure. Therefore, removal and recompaction of the undocumented fill is necessary prior to construction.
The Project site was evaluated for geotechnical feasibility pursuant to CEQA and determined to be feasible, without causing significant impacts, with implementation of design standards presented in the geotechnical report included in Appendix D. An ex ample of a design standard included in the geotechnical report is the removal and recompaction of soil to depths of 3 to 15 feet bgs or two (2) feet below footing base, whichever is deeper, in order to provide a homogeneous, dense fill mat for structural s upport. Furthermore, prior to grading, a final geotechnical report must be prepared to accompany the construction level documents and the final geotechnical report will ensure all design recommendations have been incorporated. While standard practice, the requirement for a final geotechnical report has been included as a mitigation measure for further disclosure and tracking. Therefore, implementation of Mitigation Measure s MM GEO-1 and MM GEO-2 would reduce impacts to less than significant.
Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: Implement MM GEO-1 and MM GEO-2.
Mitigation Measure MM GEO-1: The Project Applicant shall implement the recommendations contained in the report Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation for Proposed 49-Unit Residential Development, 901 E. Katella Avenue, City of Orange, Orange County, California, dated June 3, 2022, and prepared by GeoTek, Inc. (Appendix D) to reduce geologic hazards during implementation of the proposed Project. Included in the reports are site -specific recommendations involving such topics as, grading and earthwork, slope stability, retaining walls, seismic design, construction materials, geotechnical observation, and testing and plan reviews.
Mitigation Measure MM GEO-2: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare a final geotechnical report based on the final roug h grading plans and the final geotechnical report shall incorporate all of the recommendations included in the preliminary geotechnical reports included in Appendix D. The geotechnical reports included in Appendix D have established that the site is geotechnically suitable for development and a final geotechnical report is required to ensure all construction -level geotechnical recommendations and design parameters are included on the final rough grading plans.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 47
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Less than Significant.
Based on test results from GeoTek, the soils encountered on the Project site have a very low to low expansion potential. The Salem investigation encountered soils with a medium expansion potential. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM GEO -1 includes removals to ensur e a homogeneous, dense fill mat for structural support to ensure the expansion potential remains low.
Impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Less than Significant. The Project site is currently developed with commercial development that relies on sewer system connections . Construction of the proposed Project would also rely on sewer connections and no septic systems are proposed. Since no new septic is proposed, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Based on site survey and data base results presented in Paleontological Assessment for the 901 East Katella Avenue Project , dated October 25 , 2022 , by BFSA Environmental Services (Appendix E), there is a potential for paleontological resources to occur on the Project site.
The existence of Pleistocene old alluvial fan deposits near the surface of the Project site, the high paleontological resource sensitivity assigned to these sediments, and the presence of previously recorded fossil specimens from the similar deposits less than five miles of the Project site, result in the potential for significant impacts. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM PALEO-1, which requires full-time paleontological monitoring starting at a depth of five feet below the surface during grading, excavation, or utility trenching activities , would reduce impacts to less than significant.
Significance Determination: Potentially Significant
Mitigation Measures: Implement MM PALEO-1.
Mitigation Measure MM PALEO-1. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare for City review and approval a Paleontological Mitigation Monitoring Plan, as follows:
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 48
1. Prior to initiation of any grading, drilling, and/or excavation activities, a preconstruction meeting will be held and attended by the paleontologist of record, representatives of the grading contractor and subcontractors, the project owner or developer, and a representative of the lead agency. The nature of potential paleontological resources shall be discussed, as well as the protocol that is to be implemented following discovery of any fossiliferous materials.
2. Monitoring of mass grading and excavation activities shall be performed by a qualified paleontologist or paleontological monitor. Monitoring will be conducted full-time in areas of grading or excavation in undisturbed sediments of Pleistocene old alluvial fan deposits starting at a depth of five feet. The project paleontologist should have the discretion of adjusting the monitoring schedule based on any changing geological conditions observed during monitoring.
3. Paleontological monitors will be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays. The monitor must be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens in a timely manner. Monitoring may be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units are not present in the subsurface or, if present, are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified paleontological personnel to have low potential to contain fossil resources.
4. Paleontological salvage during trenching and boring activities is typically from the generated spoils and does not delay the trenching or drilling activities. Fossils are collected and placed in cardboard flats or plastic buc kets and identified by field number, collector, and date collected. Notes are taken on the map location and stratigraphy of the site, and the site is photographed before it is vacated and the fossils are removed to a safe place. On mass grading projects, any discovered fossil site is protected by red flagging to prevent it from being overrun by earthmovers (scrapers) before salvage begins. Fossils are collected in a similar manner, with notes and photographs being taken before removing the fossils. Precise location of the site is determined with the use of handheld Global Positioning System units. If the site involves a large terrestrial vertebrate, such as large bone(s) or a mammoth tusk, that is/are too large to be easily removed by a single monitor, a fossil recovery crew will excavate around the find, encase the find within a plaster and burlap jacket, and remove it after the plaster is set. For large fossils, use of the contractor’s construction equipment is solicited to help remove the jacket to a safe location before it is returned to the laboratory facility for preparation.
5. Isolated fossils are collected by hand, wrapped in paper, and placed in temporary collecting flats or five -gallon buckets. Notes are taken on the map location and stratigraphy of the site, and the site is photographed before it is vacated and the fossils are removed to a safe place.
6. Particularly small invertebrate fossils typically represent multiple specimens of a limited number of organisms, and a scientifically s uitable sample can be obtained from one to several five-gallon buckets of fossiliferous sediment. If it is possible to dry-screen the sediment in the field, a concentrated sample may consist of one or two buckets of material. For vertebrate fossils, the te st is usually the observed presence of small pieces of bones within the sediments. If present, multiple five - City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 49
gallon buckets of sediment can be collected and returned to a separate facility to wet-screen the sediment.
7. In accordance with the “Microfossil Sal vage” section of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology guidelines (2010:7), bulk sampling and screening of fine -grained sedimentary deposits (including carbonate-rich paleosols) must be performed if the deposits are identified to possess indications of producing fossil “microvertebrates” in order to test the feasibility of the deposit to yield fossil bones and teeth.
8. In the laboratory, individual fossils are cleaned of extraneous matrix, any breaks are repaired, and the specimen, if needed, is stabilized b y soaking in an archivally approved acrylic hardener (e.g., a solution of acetone and Paraloid B-72).
9. Preparation of recovered specimens to a point of identification and permanent preservation (not display), including screen -washing sediments to recover sm all invertebrates and vertebrates. Preparation of individual vertebrate fossils is often more time-consuming than for accumulations of invertebrate fossils.
10. Identification and curation of specimens into a professional, accredited public museum repository w ith a commitment to archival conservation and permanent retrievable storage (e.g., OC Parks in Santa Ana, California). The paleontological program should include a written repository agreement prior to the initiation of mitigation activities. The lead agency may select another repository if it so desires.
11. Preparation of a final monitoring and mitigation report of findings and significance, including lists of all fossils recovered and necessary maps and graphics to accurately record their original location(s ). The report, when submitted to and accepted by the appropriate lead agency, will signify satisfactory completion of the project program to mitigate impacts to any potential nonrenewable paleontological resources (i.e., fossils) that might have been lost or otherwise adversely affected without such a program in place.
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated
Sources: Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation for Proposed 49 -Unit Residential Development, 901 E. Katella Avenue, City of Orange, Orange County, California, dated June 3, 2022 and prepared by GeoTek, Inc. (Appendix D) ; and Paleontological Assessment fo r the 901 East Katella Avenue Project, dated October 25, 2022, by BFSA Environmental Services (Appendix E).
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 50
5.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emission of
greenhouse gases?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Impact Analysis
GHGs comprise less than 0.1 percent of the total atmospheric composition, yet they play an essential role in influencing climate. Greenhouse gases include naturally occurring compounds such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), water vapor (H2O), and nitrous oxide (N2O), while others are synthetic. Man -made GHGs include chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), and perfluorocarbons (PFCs), as well as sulfur hexafluoride (SF6).
The State of California has adopted extensive legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions across all sectors of the economy. Some of the key climate change legislation includes Assembly Bill (AB) 32 – the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, Senate Bill (SB) 375 – the Sustainable Communities & Climate Protection Act of 2008, and SB 100 – the California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program.
The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SC AQMD) convened a GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Working Group (Working Group). At its last meeting in September 2010, the Working Group established for non-exempt projects, such as the proposed Project, a screening level threshold of 3,000 metric tons of CO2e (MTCO2e) and land use specific thresholds, which for residential projects, was established at 3,500 MTCO 2e. Greenhouse gas emissions occur from the following four sources for residential projects: construction; gas, electricity, and water uses; solid waste disposal; and motor vehicle use. Since construction operations are temporary, short - term emissions, the total construction emissions are amortized over 30 years per Working Group guidance. The City of Orange relies on the SCAQMD thresholds as its thr esholds of significance for GHG emissions.
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less Than Significant. The proposed Project would generate greenhouse gas emissions through the construction and operation of the proposed residences.
As documented in the report, 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Development Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study, City of Orange, Californ ia, dated September 5, 2023, and prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc. ( Appendix A), total GHG emissions for the proposed City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 51
Project would be less than the screening level threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e and the land use specific threshold of 3,500 MTCO2e, as shown in the following tables.
Table 8. Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Emission Source On-site
(MTCO2e)1
Off-site
(MTCO2e)1
Total
(MTCO2e)1
Demolition 21.22 10.77 31.99
Site Preparation 3.26 0.10 3.36
Grading 5.48 3.15 8.63
Building Construction 229.55 68.24 297.79
Paving 7.82 0.62 8.44
Architectural Coating 1.28 0.42 1.70
Total 268.61 83.30 351.91
Amortized over 30 years2 8.95 2.78 11.73
Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study (Appendix A) 1 MTCO2e is metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (includes carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and/or hydrofluorocarbon)
2 The emissions are amortized over 30 years and added to the operational emissions, pursuant to SCAQMD recommendations.
Table 9. Operational and Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions Emission Source GHG Emissions
(MTCO2e)1
Mobile Source 415.04
Energy Source 92.80
Area Source 13.46
Water 16.71
Waste 12.03
Construction 30-yr Amortization 11.73
Total 561.77
SCAQMD Tier 3 Screening Threshold2 3000
Exceed Tier 3 Threshold? No
Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study (Appendix A) 1 MTCO2e is metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (includes carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and/or hydrofluorocarbon)
2 Per South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold, October 2008.
Since the proposed Project would generate less than 3,000 MTCO 2e, which is the emission threshold established by the City of Orange and SCAQMD, the Project would have a less than significant impact.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emission of greenhouse gases? Less than Significant. The proposed Project will be required to comply with the mandatory requirements of the latest 2019 California Building Standards Code, City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 52
including Title 24, Part 11, CALGreen, and Title 24, Part 6, Energy Code. The purpose of the building standards is to reduce negative impacts on the environment through improved planning and design, energy efficiency, water efficiency and conservation, and material and resource conservation. The California Building Standards were developed to help meet the requirements of the Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32).
By complying with the California Building Standards Code requirements the project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases, and the impact is considered less than significant.
Furthermore, the Project will implement Project Design Features, as described in the Air Quality section, that will further ensure the Project is consistent with applicable GHG reduction standards.
Therefore, the proposed Project’s generation of GHG emissions would not make a project-specific or cumulatively considerable contribution to conflicting with an applicable plan, policy or regulation for the purposes of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases, and the proposed Project’s impact would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant Sources: 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Development Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study, City of Orange, California, dated September 5 2023, and prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc. (Appendix A).
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 53
5.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would
the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code § 65962.5 and, as a result, would it
create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Impact Analysis
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was prepared to analyze the history of the site and the potential for encountering hazardous materials. The report, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, dated May13, 2022 by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. is included in Appendix F.
The Project site was previously used as agricultural land between 1938 and 1963 , graded circa 1968 and developed with the current commercial use in 1970. According to a previous analysis by BA Environmental in 2014, records indicate the Project site had a 4,000-gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST) near the northeast corner of the building. According to the Orange Fire Department (OFD) records, the UST was removed in 2013. During removal there was no evidence of leaking. Soil samples were collected and reported no detectable concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons. The Orange County Environmental Health Care Agency (OCHCA) and OFD determined no leak occurred and no further action was required.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 54
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Residential projects are not operators or generators of hazardous materials. Thus, operation of the proposed Project would not involve the use, transport, or disposal of hazardous materials, nor would it generate hazardous emissions, materials, or wastes. Grading and construction activities may involve limited transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials such as fuel for construction equipment. However, construction activities are short-term and hazardous materials used during construction would be t ransported, used, and disposed of according to federal, State, and local health and safety requirements.
Given the age of the structure on the Project site there is a potential for asbestos containing materials (ACM), lead based paint (LBP) and polychlor inated biphenyl (PCBs). Access into the structures was not available during on-site surveys. Since there is potential for these toxic materials to exist on the Project site and the transport and disposal of these materials has the potential for release of hazards, a significant impact would occur. To mitigate impacts to less than significant, a survey for asbestos, lead based paint and polychlorinated biphenyl shall be conducted as outlined within Mitigation Measure MM HAZ-1 shall be implemented.
Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM HAZ -1 would reduce impacts to less than significant.
Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: Implement MM HAZ-1.
Mitigation Measure MM HAZ-1: Prior to the demolition of existing structures, a survey for asbestos containing materials (ACM), lead based paint (LBP), and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCBs) shall be conducted, and any such materials shall be removed and disposed of properly by qualified certified technicians in accordance with State regulations.
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report (Appendix F) includes results from database searches to determine the potential for release of hazardous materials from the Proposed Project site. No Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC), Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CREC), or Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions (HREC) occur on the Project site. There is a Business Environmental Risk (BER) associated with the potential for ACM and LBP, which has been addressed in Mitigation Measure MM HAZ -1. Furthermore, residential projects are not operators or generators of hazardous materials. The proposed Project would not involve the use, transport, or disposal of hazardous materials, nor would it generate hazardous emissions, materials, or wastes during operations. Hazardous materials used during construction would be used in accordance with federal, State, and local regulations. Previous Asbestos, Lead and Miscellaneous Toxic Materials (universal wastes) , if present, would be handled and di sposed of in accordance City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 55
with Mitigation Measure MM HAZ -1. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM HAZ -1 would reduce impacts to less than significant.
Neither the Project site conditions, nor Project activities, would result in a reasonably foreseeable accident condition, given the minimal use of hazardous materials during the limited construction phase of the Project. Therefore, no potential for release of hazardous materials was identified and impacts would be less than significant with mitigation.
Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: Implement MM HAZ-1.
Mitigation Measure MM HAZ-1: Prior to the demolition of existing structures, a survey for asbestos containing materials (ACM), lead based paint (LBP), and polyc hlorinated biphenyl (PCBs) shall be conducted, and any such materials shall be removed and disposed of properly by qualified certified technicians in accordance with State regulations.
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant wit h Mitigation Incorporated
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project site is located approximately one-quarter mile north of the California Inspire Academy / California Elementary school located at 1081 N.
California Street, Orange, which creates a potentially significant impact.
Residential projects are not operators or generators of hazardous materials. Thus, operation of the proposed Project would not involve the use, transport, or disposal of hazardous materials, nor would it generate hazardous emissions, materials, or wastes. Grading and construction activitie s may involve limited transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials such as fuel for construction equipment. However, construction activities are short -term and hazardous materials used during construction would be transported, used, and disposed of according to federal, State, and local health and safety requirements. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Given the age of the structures on the Project site, there is a potential for asbestos containing materials (ACM), lead based paint ( LBP) and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCBs). Access into the structures was not available during on-site surveys. Since there is potential for these toxic materials to exist on the Project site and the transport and disposal of these materials has the potential for release of hazards, a significant impact would occur. To mitigate impacts to less than significant, the Applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure MM HAZ-1, which would reduce impacts to less than significant.
Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: Implement MM HAZ-1.
Mitigation Measure MM HAZ-1: Prior to the demolition of existing structures, a survey for asbestos containing materials (ACM), lead based paint (LBP), and p olychlorinated biphenyl (PCBs) shall be conducted, and any such materials shall be removed and disposed of properly by qualified certified technicians in accordance with State regulations.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 56
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code § 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Less than Significant. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report (Appendix F) includes results from database searches to determine if the Project site is on a list of hazardous materials sites . The Phase I searched the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA), Orange Fire Department (OFD), South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), City of Orange building and planning departments, and California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM). The Project site is not listed on any of the regulatory databases and no other sites listed on the databases pose a significant threat to the Project site. No oil wells are located on the Project site. Therefore, no Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC) were identified on or near the Project site. Impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public ai rport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?Less than Significant. The Project site is not located within an airport land use plan, nor within two miles of a private airstrip or public airport. The closest airport is John Wayne Airport, located in Santa Ana, approximately 9 miles from the Project site. Impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emerg ency evacuation plan? Less than Significant. The Project site is bordered by Cambridge Street and E. Katella Avenue and surrounding residential and commercial development. According to the City’s General Plan Public Safety Element, Figure PS -4, Generalized Evacuation Corridors, the closest emergency evacuation routes to the Project site include E. Katella Avenue, adjacent to the Project site, and Glassell Street, west of the Project site.
These emergency access routes would remain unchanged by the proposed Project and the proposed Project would not interfere with an emergency response plan. Furthermore, during site plan review the Orange Fire Department determined the proposed Project provides sufficient on -site emergency access. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 57
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? Less than Significant. According to Cal Fire – Fire and Resource Assessment Program, the Project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.
The Project site is surrounded by existing developed and urban conditions and is not located near wildlands. Therefore, the proposed Project would not expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. Furthermore, the proposed Project would provide new streets and fire hydrants, landscaping compatible for wildland fire restrictions, and all new structures would comply with current buil ding standards, including fire sprinklers. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant Sources: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, dated May13, 2022 by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Appendix F); City of Orange General Plan Public Safety Element, Figures PS-1 and PS-4; and Cal Fire – Fire and Resource Assessment Program, Fire Hazard Severity Zones (ca.gov).
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 58
5.10 Hydrology and Water Quality
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the
project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade
surface or groundwater quality?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such
that the project may impede sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a s tream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site; ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding on- or offsite;
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
iii) create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted runoff;
or
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
iv) impede or redirect flood flows? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water
quality control plan or sustainable groundwater
management plan?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Impact Analysis
The hydraulic and water quality analysis is based on the technical reports, Preliminary Hydrology Study, TTM 19253, 901 E. Katella Avenue, Orange, California, 92867 , dated August 2022, by C&V Consulting, Inc. included in Appendix G and the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), 901 E. Katella Avenue, Orange, CA 92867 , dated August 2022, by C&V Consulting, Inc. (Appendix H).
Currently, the Project site primarily flows in the north and westerly direction toward N. Cambridge Street. Stormwater flow is concentrated within v -gutters at the centers of the parking lot drive aisles. The area west and south of the existing building appear to slope away from the building to City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 59
the west and south toward th e public right -of-way, respectively. No offsite run -on drainage or cross lot drainage is entering the site.
Once the runoff reaches N. Cambridge Street, it flows north and is then conveyed in the catch basin directly north of the intersection with Trenton Avenue. The Project site is located within the Santa Ana River Watershed per the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) Drainage System Map No. 21. Per the OCFCD Drainage Maps, stormwater then enters the existing underground storm drain system and continues to the OCFCD Marlboro Storm Channel, converging with the Collins Storm Channel, Santa Ana River, and ultimately discharging to the Pacific Ocean.
Runoff in the proposed condition will be conveyed through concrete v -gutters then collected by two (2) onsite catch basins and an onsite area drain system that will be routed to the proposed Biofiltration Vault treatment device prior to discharge to the public right-of-way via a stormwater sump pump system. Treated runoff and overflow will be conveyed t hrough a proposed parkway drain to the public right-of-way of Cambridge Street. Upon entering Cambridge Street, site runoff will follow the existing historical drainage pattern.
a) Less than Significant. Water quality treatment is further discussed in the Water Quality Management Plan, included in Appendix H . Water quality treatment will be provided by a Modular Wetlands System (MWS) biofiltration vault. The MWS has been sized to collect and treat runoff from a 24-hour, 85th percentile storm event prior to release into the storm drain system. The MWS system has been reviewed and determined consistent with Orange County Technical Guidance Document (OC TGD) requirements for water quality. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
b) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality? Less than Significant. The geology and geotechnical analysis (see Section 5.7) determined the Project site is underlain by dense alluvium.
Drilling to 50 feet below ground surface (bgs) did not encounter groundwater. Furthermore, the percolation testing determined a low feasibility for infiltration with low percolation rates. Without feasible infiltration, the Project site d oes not provide groundwater recharge. Furthermore, the Project is not relying on groundwater supplies and no groundwater was encountered to the maximum drilling depth of 50 feet. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
C.i ) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or off-site? City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 60
Less than Significant. Development of the Project site would increase the amount of impervious surface, increase stormwater runoff that could lead to erosion, and increase stormwater runoff that could exceed existing conditions, leading to downstream flooding. However, the proposed Project is in an area with an existing fully stabilized drainage system(s) receiving runoff from the Project site and the proposed Project is designed with a biofiltration vault system that would reduce potential impacts from onsite erosion to offsite collection systems to less than significant.
Table 10 below compares the existing runoff in the 25 (Q 25) and 100-year (Q100) storm events to the proposed Project conditions. As shown in this table, the proposed Project would reduce storm runoff from the Project site.
Table 10. Peak Discharge Rates Q25 and Q100 for Existing and Proposed Conditions Q25 (CFS) Q100 (cfs)
Existing Condition 8.58 11.17
Proposed Condition 7.95 10.31
% Decrease -7.3% -7.7%
Reducing the peak discharge rates to below existing conditions would also reduce the risk of downstream erosion and/or flooding, resulting in less than significant impacts.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
C.ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on - or offsite? Less than Significant. Development of the Project site would increase the amount of impervious surface, increase stormwater runoff that could lead to erosion, and increase stormwater runoff that could exceed existing conditions, leading to downstream flooding. However, the propo sed Project is in an area with an existing fully stabilized drainage system(s) receiving runoff from the Project site and the proposed Project is designed with a biofiltration vault system that would reduce potential impacts from onsite erosion to offsite collection systems to less than significant.
Table 10 above compares the existing runoff in the 25 (Q 25) and 100-year (Q100) storm events to the proposed Project conditions. As shown in this table, the proposed Project would reduce storm runoff from the Project site.
Reducing the peak discharge rates to below existing conditions would also reduce the risk of downstream erosion and/or flooding, resulting in less than significant impacts.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
C.iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less than Significant. Development of the Project site would increase the amount of City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 61
impervious surface, increase stormwater runoff that could lead to erosion, and increase stormwater runoff that could exceed existing conditions, leading to downstream flooding. However, the proposed Project is in an area with an existing fully stabilized drainage system(s) receiving runoff from the Project site and the proposed Project is designed with a biofiltration vault system that would reduce potential impacts fro m onsite erosion to offsite collection systems to less than significant.
Table 10 above compares the existing runoff in the 25 (Q 25) and 100-year (Q100) storm events to the proposed Project conditions. As shown in this table, the proposed Project would reduce storm runoff from the Project site.
Reducing the peak discharge rates to below existing conditions would also reduce the risk of downstream erosion and/or flooding, resulting in less than significant impacts.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
C.iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? Less than Significant. Development of the Project site would increase the amount of impervious surface, increase stormwater runoff that could lead to erosion, and increase stormwater runoff that could exceed existing conditions, leading to downstream flooding. However, the proposed Project is in an area with an existing fully stabilized drainage system(s) receiving runoff from the Project site and the proposed Project is designed with a biofiltration vault system that would reduce potential impacts from onsite erosion to offsite collection systems to less than significant.
Table 10 above compares the existing r unoff in the 25 (Q 25) and 100-year (Q100) storm events to the proposed Project conditions. As shown in this table, the proposed Project would reduce storm runoff from the Project site.
Reducing the peak discharge rates to below existing conditions would also reduce the risk of downstream erosion and/or flooding, resulting in less than significant impacts.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? No Impact. The Project site is not located in flood hazard area. Furthermore, the Project site is approximately 14 miles from the Pacific Ocean and no other large waterbodies are located nearby; therefore, no impacts from tsunami or seiche would occur. No impacts would occur.
Significance Determination: No Impact
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 62
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? Less than Significant. The Project has been designed to be consistent with the City of Orange Local Implementation Plan (LIP) and OC TGD, which includes water quality and hydromodification requirements. The infiltration testing on the Project site did not identify favorable infiltration conditions. Furthermore, no groundwater was encountered to exploratory depth of 50 feet . The proposed Pr oject includes a Modular Wetland System for treatment, which is consistent with the OC TGD requirements. Therefore, impacts to water quality are less than significant and the proposed Project is consistent with water quality regulations.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant Sources: Preliminary Hydrology Study, TTM 19253, 901 E. Katella Avenue, Orange, California, 92867, dated August 2022, by C&V Consulting, Inc. (Appendix G); and Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), 901 E. Katella Avenue, Orange, CA 92867, dated August 2022, by C&V Consulting, Inc. (Appendix H).
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 63
5.11 Land Use and Planning
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a
conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Impact Analysis
The Project proposes to change the General Plan and Zoning designation s for the Project site as follows:
General Plan
Zoning
Existing:
General Commercial (GC) Commercial Professional (C-P)
Proposed: Medium Density Residential
(MDR)
Multiple Family Residential (R-3)
The Project also proposes development standards under the City’s Small Lot Subdivision Development Standards (OMC 17.14.270).
a) Physically divide an established community? Less than Significant. The proposed Project plans to demolish an existing commercial structure and associated accessory uses, such as a parking lot, communication tower, etc . The Project site is surrounded by existing roads and development on all four sides. The proposed Project is not gated and includes pedestrian walkways through the Project site that would be available to existing surrounding residents.
The proposed Project would require a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. However, these changes would not divide an existing community. The Project site is currently developed, and the proposal would only change the land use and not create a barrier that would divide the community.
Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an e nvironmental effect? Less than Significant. The proposed Project is currently not consistent with the adopted land use plan and both a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be required. However, there is no indication the current land use designatio n for the Project site was adopted for the purpose of City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 64
avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The Project site was previously developed with all areas of the Project site previously disturbed. Therefore, the current land use designation was not adopted to avoid physical impact to the Project site. The prior development of the Project site also previously generated traffic, noise, and air quality emissions. Therefore, there is no indication the current land use designation was adopted to avoid environmental effects from the operation of uses on the Project site.
This Initial Study analyzes the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of the proposed Project. As such, this Initial Study also analyzes the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of the proposed change in land use designation. All impacts have been determined to be either less than significant or mitigated to less than significant.
Therefore, while the Project is inconsistent with the existing land use designation, the existing land use designation was not adopted to avoid environmental effects. Therefore, the impact is less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant Sources: Orange General Plan Land Use Plan.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 65
5.12 Mineral Resources
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Impact Analysis
a ) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. The City of Orange prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for its General Plan update. Section 7.5 of the General Plan EIR determined adoption of the current General Plan would have no significant effect on Mineral Resources. This conclusion was reached bec ause the areas within the City of Orange with significant aggregate resources as identified by the State Mining and Geology Board are designated as Resource Areas or Open Space in the General Plan. Since the adoption of the updated General Plan continued t o implement these land use designations, the EIR found that no significant impact would occur.
Since the Project site is currently designated General Commercial (G -C) and not Resource Areas or Open Space, the proposed Project would not impact a site that has been historically used for the extraction of mineral resources, nor would the proposed Project conflict with areas designated by the General Plan as mineral resources. Therefore, no impact associated with the loss of availability of a known mineral resource would occur.
Significance Determination: No Impact
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. The City of Orange prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for its General P lan update. Section
7.5 of the General Plan EIR determined adoption of the current General Plan would have no significant effect on Mineral Resources. This conclusion was reached because the areas within the City of Orange with significant aggregate resources as identified by the State Mining and Geology Board are designated as Resource Areas or Open Space in the General Plan. Since the adoption of the updated General Plan continued to implement these land use designations, the EIR found that no significant impact would occur.
Since the Project site is currently designated General Commercial (G -C) and not Resource Areas or Open Space, the proposed Project would not impact a site that has been historically used for the City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 66
extraction of mineral resources, nor would the proposed Project conflict with areas designated by the General Plan as mineral resources. Therefore, no impact associated with the loss of availability of a known mineral resource would occur.
Significance Determination: No Impact
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact
Sources: City of Orange General Plan Land Use Plan; and City of Orange General Plan EIR, Section 7.5, P. 7-17.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 67
5.13 Noise
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a
plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area
to excessive noise levels?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Impact Analysis
Noise impacts can occur from construction operations and long-term operations of a project, which for residential consists of vehicle traffic noise, and stationary sources, such as air conditioning noise. Potential noise impacts from thes e sources were analyzed in the report, 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Development Noise Impact Study, City of Orange, California, prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc., dated September 5, 2023 and included in Appendix I.
Noise is regulated by the City of Orange General Plan and Chapter 8.24 of the Orange Municipal Code. For construction noise, Chapter 8.24.050 of the Orange Municipal Code states that construction activity is exempt from exterior noise standards provided construction activities take plan between the hours of 7 a.m. and 8 p.m. on any day except for Sunday or a Federal holiday, or between the hours of 9 a.m. and 8 p.m. on Sunday or a Federal holiday . Noise generated outside of those hours is subject to the standards in Table 8.24.040.
The standards for stationary noise sources are defined in Table N -4 of the Orange General Plan Noise Element. During the daytime (7am – 10 pm), hourly noise levels shall not exceed 55 dBA, with a maximum of 70 dBA. During the nighttime (10 pm – 7 am), hourly noise levels shall not exceed 45 dBA, with a maximum of 65 dBA.
The Orange General Plan Noise Element also provides land use compatibility standards in T able N-3. For medium density residential neighborhoods, the land use compatibility noise standard is 45 dBA CNEL for interior and 65 dBA CNEL for exterior. The CNEL noise metric is the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL), which is a 24 -hour weighted av erage noise measurement.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 68
In addition to the noise standards outlined in Tables N -3 and N -4, the City has established the following increases in ambient noise levels as the thresholds for determining significance under CEQA.
• Where the existing ambient noi se level is less than 65 dBA, a project related permanent increase in ambient noise levels of 5 dBA CNEL or greater.
• Where the existing ambient noise level is greater than 65 dBA, a project related permanent increase in ambient noise levels of 3 dBA CNEL or greater.
The analysis of noise impacts included in the Noise Study assumes implementation of design features designed to reduce noise emissions. These commitments are defined as Project Design Features (PDFs), which will be included in the Mitigation M onitoring and Reporting Program as PDFs to ensure implementation. The following PDFs were included in the noise analysis and are hereby incorporated into the Project.
PDF NOI-1 The project will need to comply with California Title 24 building insulation requirements for exterior walls, roofs, and common separating assemblies (e.g. floor/ceiling assemblies and demising walls), which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a building permit.
• Interior noise levels due to exterior sources must not exceed a community noise equivalent level (CNEL) or a day -night level (LDN) of 45 dBA, in any habitable room.
• Party wall assembly designs must provide a minimum STC of 50, based on lab tests. Field tested assemblies must provide a minimum noise isolation class (NIC) of 45.
PDF NOI-2 A “windows closed” condition is expected to be required for all residential units within the project site to meet the interior noise standard. To accommodate windows closed conditions, all units shall be equipped with adequate fresh air ventilation, per the requirements of the California Building Standards.
PDF NOI-3 Upgraded windows and sliding glass doors with a minimum STC rating of 32 or greater are expected to be required for all units facing Cambridge Street and Katella Avenue.
PDF NOI-4 Deliveries, loading and unloading activities, and trash pick -up hours should be limited to daytime hours only (7 a.m. – 10 p.m.).
PDF NOI-5 Engine idling time for all delivery vehicles and moving trucks to 5 minutes or less.
PDF NOI-6 Construction-related noise shall take place only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, and 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Sundays and Federal holidays.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 69
PDF NOI-7 Provide public notifications and signage in readily visible locations along the perimeter of construction sites that indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a telephone number where neighbors can enquire about the construction process and register complaints to a designated construction noise disturbance coordinator.
PDF NOI-8 All construction equipment shall be equipped with muffles and other suitable noise attenuation devices (e.g., engine shields).
PDF NOI-9 Establish an electric connection to the site to avoid the use of diesel- and gas - powered generators, if feasible.
PDF NOI-10 Locate staging area, generators, and stationary construction equipment as far from the adjacent residential homes as feasible.
PDF NOI-11 Construction-related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for more than 5 minutes.
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less than Significant. Noise impacts can occur from construction operations and long -term operations of a project, which for residential consists of vehicle traffic noise, and stationary sources, such as air conditioning noise. Potential noise impacts from these sources we re analyzed in the report, 901 E. Katella Avenue In -Fill Residential Development Noise Impact Study, City of Orange, California , prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc., dated September 5, 2023, and included in Appendix I.
While construction noise levels are exempt from the City’s noise standards, construction noise levels were calculated for the different phases of construction, including demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. The construction levels were measured against the Federal Transportation Administration General Assessment Construction Noise Criteria.
Noise levels for each stage of construction are shown in Table 11 below.
Table 11. Construction Noise Levels at Neighboring Properties Stage Equipment Combined Noise Level (dBA)
Demolition Concrete saw, rubber tired dozers, tractors, loaders, backhoes 85.2 Site Preparation Graders, scrapers, tractors, loaders, backhoes 83.0 Grading tractors, loaders, backhoes, graders, rubber tired dozers 83.8 Bldg Const. Cranes, forklifts, gen sets, tractors, welders 81.9 Paving tractors, loaders, backhoes, concrete mixers, pavers, rollers 82.0 Arch Coating Air compressors 71.7
Worst case Construction Phase Noise Level – Leq (dBA) 85.2 FDA Daytime General Assessment Construction Noise Criteria – Leq (dBA) 90.0 Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, Section 7 Noise and Vibration during Construction, by the Federal Transit Administration
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 70
As shown in Table 11, all of the construction operations remain below the 90 dBA threshold of significance. This construction analysis assumes implementation of the Project Design Features and compliance with the City’s noise ordinance. No significant impacts have been identified.
Operational noise impacts were analyzed by combining equipment noise from HVAC equipment, road noise from additional vehicle trips and ambient conditions to determine cumulative noise impacts from the operation of the proposed Project. Tables 12 and 13 below summarize the results for daytime and nighttime, respectively.
Table 12. Daytime Cumulative Noise Impacts
Receiver
Number
Receiver Location Ambient
(dBA)
Project Noise
(dBA)
Cumulative
(dBA)
Increase over
Ambient (dBA)
R1 Northwest 60.2 35.1 60.2 0.1
R2 North 56.0 44.5 56.3 0.3
R3 Northeast 56.0 36.3 56.0 0.4
Source: Noise Study Report, RK Engineering, Table 12
The City of Orange daytime noise level standard (Leq) is 55 dBA. The noise generated by the Project would not exceed 55 dBA. Furthermore, a significant impact would occur where there is an existing ambient noise level of less than 65 dBA and a project related permanent increase in ambient noise levels of 5 dBA CNEL or greater. The largest increase is 0.4 dBA, which is less than the 5dBA threshold and impacts would be less than significant.
Table 13. Nighttime Cumulative Noise Impacts
Receiver
Number
Receiver Location Ambient
(dBA)
Project Noise
(dBA)
Cumulative
(dBA)
Increase over
Ambient (dBA)
R1 Northwest 50.2 34.8 50.3 0.1
R2 North 46.0 44.5 48.3 2.3
R3 Northeast 46.0 36.2 46.4 0.4
Source: Noise Study Report, RK Engineering, Table 13
The City of Orange nighttime noise level standard (Leq) is 45 dBA. The noise generated by the Project would not exceed 45 dBA. Furthermore, a significant impact would occur where there is an existing ambient noise level of less than 65 dBA and a project related permanent increase in ambient noise levels of 5 dBA CNEL or greater. The largest increase is 2.3 dBA, which is less than the 5dBA threshold and impacts would be less than significant.
Noise increases of 3 dBA are generally the limits of detection by the human ear. Less than 3 dBA increases in noise levels are not perce ptible by humans. Therefore, 3 dBA is often used to determine if changes in noise are audible. The largest increase in noise over ambient conditions during both the daytime and nighttime is 2.3 dBA, well below the audible limit. Therefore, cumulative noise level increases from the proposed Project would not be audible and therefore, less than significant.
Lastly, the proposed Project is consistent with the noise policies and land use compatibility standards contained in the City of Orange General Plan. The common pocket park located along the northern property line would remain below the 6 5 dBA CNEL land use compatibility City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 71
designation and ambient noise conditions would not impact interior noise levels of the proposed Project or surrounding sensitive receptors. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less than Significant. The proposed grading phase of construction is expected to generate the highest vibration levels of the three construction stages referenced in Table 13 , as it includes the use of excavation and grading equipment. The evaluation of an impact’s significance can be determined by reviewing both the likelihood of annoyance to individuals as well as the potential for damage to existing structures. The construction vibration assessment utilizes the referenced vibration levels and methodology set forth within the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, Federal Transit Administration, September 2018.
According to the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, Federal Transit Administration, September 2018 , the appropriate threshold for damage to modern residential structures is a PPV of 0.5 inches/second. Annoyance is assessed based on levels of perception, with a PPV of 0.01 being considered “barely perceptible,” 0.04 inches/seco nd as “distinctly perceptible,” 0.1 inches/second as “strongly perceptible,” and 0.4 inches/second as “severe.”
The nearest location of grading equipment to occupied residences is approximately 60 feet. At this distance, the PPV from a large bulldozer wou ld be approximately 0.0 34 inches/second; from a vibratory roller would be approximately 0.080 inches/second; and from loaded trucks would be approximately 0.029 inches/second. This level of vibration falls below the building damage PPV criteria of 0.5 inches/second. In terms of annoyance, the impact would be “barely perceptible” to “distinctly perceptible.” Since construction vibration would not cause damage to off-site buildings and the majority of the grading would be barely perceptible to off-site receivers, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the p roject area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The Project site is not located within an airport land use plan, nor within two miles of a private airstrip or public airport. The closest airport is John Wayne Airport, located in Santa Ana, approximately 9 miles from the Project site. No impact would occur.
Significance Determination: No Impact
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 72
Sources: 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Development Noise Impact Study, City of Orange, California, prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc., dated September 5, 2023, and included in Appendix I; City of Orange General Plan; City of Orange Municipal Code; and Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, Federal Transit Administration, September 2018.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 73
5.14 Population and Housing
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new
homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or
housing, necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Impact Analysis
The American Community Survey, prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau, provides demographic data for cities, such as Orange. The Census defines a "household" as all persons who occupy a housing unit, which may include single persons living alone, families related through marriage or blood, or unrelated persons sharing living quarters. Persons living in retirement or convalescent homes, dormitories, or other group living situations are not considered households.
The American Community Survey estimated that in 2 022 the City of Orange had 43,421 households, an average household size of 3.03 persons per household , and a total population of 136,178 persons2.
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Less than Significant. The proposed Project would generate growth beyond that planned in the City’s General Plan due to the conversion of commercial use to residential use. However, the proposed Project would not indirectly encourage population growth in other areas of the City.
The proposed Project does not include any infrastructure that could indirectly cause growth in other portions of the City. The proposed Project is located on an already developed site and bordered on two sides by existing roadways and by existing residential and commercial development on the other two sides of the Project site . The proposed Project would connect to existing water and sewer service within surrounding streets . The domestic water main along the Project frontage of E. Katella and Cambridge Street will be upgraded from a 6 -inch line to an 8 - inch line. This upgrade is necessary to serve the existing plus project condition and does not constitute a growth-inducing upgrade. Therefore, the proposed Project does not include any infrastructure, such as roadways, water, sewer or other facilities, sized beyond what is necessary to serve only the proposed Project, therefore, no growth-inducing impacts would occur.
2 The City of Orange 2021-2029 Housing Element Update included data from the 2019 American Community Survey, which shows the City with 43,075 households and an average household size of 3.18. The analysis in this section relies on the 2022 American Community Survey data, which is slightly different than the data from 2019. The difference in data does not change the analysis or conclusions presented in this section.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 74
At 3.03 persons per household, the additional 49 residential units would generate approximately 148 additional residents for the City that would exceed General Plan projections. The current population of Orange is approximately 136,178 residents. The addition of 148 residents above the General Plan projections represents approximately 0.0011% of the current population . A 1/10 of 1% increase is not considered a substantial unplanned population increase and the very small population increase would not cause impacts to public services.
Furthermore, this IS/MND has analyzed the additional 49 dwelling units in its analysis of the operational topics that are sensitive to density and the number of dwelling units, such as air quality, greenhouse gas, noise, energy, population and housing, public services, traffic, and utilities. This IS/MND has found for each of those environmental topics all impacts would be either less than significant or can be mitigated to less than significant. Therefore, potential impacts associated with growth beyond General Plan projections would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Less than Significant. The Project site currently contains an abandoned commercial development that would be impacted by the Project. No existing residences would be displaced. Therefore, impacts associated with the loss of existing residential units and displacement of people would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant Sources: City of Orange General Plan 2021-2029 Housing Element Update; and American Community Survey prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) | Department of Finance.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 75
5.15 Public Service
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
PUBLIC SERVICES.
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts
associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response ti mes, or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Police protection? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Schools? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Parks? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Other public facilities? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Impact Analysis
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Less than Significant.
Fire Protection. The proposed Project site is served by the City of Orange Fire Department.
Orange’s Fire Department provides fire, paramedic, and ambulance services. Paramedic teams are located at eight stations, of which three also provide ambulance service with an average response time of 4 minutes, 47 seconds; and average transport unit response times of 5 minutes, 29 seconds.
The Fire Department employs fire fighters who are also trained in paramedic techniques.
The closest fire station to the proposed Project site is Station #3 located at 1910 N. Shaffer Street, approximately 0.9 miles from the Project site. The next closest station is Station #2 located at 2900 E. Collins Avenue, approximately 1.75 miles from the Project site.
Orange Fire previously served the approximately 20,000 square foot commercial use and wireless communication facility and continues to respond to service calls to the abandoned building.
Redevelopment of the property would not change the City’s ability to continue to provide service.
The additional 49 residential units and approximately 148 residents would change the demands on the Fire Department from commercial (and now abandoned commercial) to residential. Through City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 76
the development review process, Orange Fire has reviewed the proposed Project for site access, turn-arounds, fire hose pull lengths, fire hydrant placement, etc. and determined the Project meets Fire Department requirements. Or ange Fire also determined that the change from commercial to residential service of 49 residential units would cause an incremental increase in demand on Fire Department resources, however that incremental demand represents such a small fraction of the overall service area that Orange Fire can serve the proposed Project without any significant reduction in level or service, response times, or the need for additional equipment or personnel.
Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Police Protection. The City of Orange Police Department currently serves the Proposed Project site. The City’s Police Station Headquarters are located at 11 07 N. Batavia Street, approximately
1.2 miles west of the Project site. However, police officers are routinely on patrol throughout the City, therefore, response times can vary.
The Project site is currently being served by the Orange Police Department and the redevelopment of the property would not change the City’s ability to continue to provide service. The additional 49 residential units and 148 residents above General Plan projections would place additional demands on the Police Department not previously planned. Using design strategies and added security measures from various stakeholders could help reduce the number of times the police department responds to the proposed project. To ensure adequate services are provided and to minimize the demands on police services, security and design strategies which employ defensible space concepts shall be utilized throughout the formation of development and construction plans.
These measures incorporate the concepts of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED), which involves the placement, and orientation of str uctures, access and visibility of common areas, placement of doors, windows, addressing, lighting and landscaping. CPTED promotes public safety, physical security and allows citizens the ability to monitor activity. In addition, the project shall comply with the requirements established in Chapter 15.52 of the Orange Municipal Code (Building Security Ordinance #6 -18). Conditions of approval related to CPTED and the Orange Building Security Standards will be included on the Project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Schools. The Project site falls within the boundaries of the Orange Unified School District (OUSD). OUSD provides three (3) preschools, 29 elementary schools, 7 middle schools, and 6 high schools . Students from the proposed Project would likely attend California Elementary School for grades TK -5, Yorba Middle School for grades 6 -8, and Villa Park High School for grades 9-12.
The additional 49 residential units and 148 residents above General Plan projections would place additional demands on the public school system not previously planned. However, the additional number of students generated by the proposed Project would be a small fraction of the overall student population of the school district.
In accordance with standard conditions of approval, the Project Applicant would be required to pay development impact fees to both OUSD residential development per Senate Bill (SB) 50. The City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 77
fees would be collected by the school districts at the time building permits are issued. As stated in Government Code Section 65995(h):
The payment or satisfaction of a fee, charge, or other requirement levied or imposed … are hereby deemed to be full and complete mitigation of the impacts of any legislative or adjudicative act, or both, involving, but not limited to, the planning, use, or development of real property, or any change in governmental organization or reorganization …on the provision of adequate school facilities.
Payment of these fees would offset impac ts from the increased demand for school services associated with the proposed Project by providing an adequate financial base to construct and equip new and existing schools as needed. Therefore, OUSD would be able to provide adequate school facilities for the projected student residents of the proposed Project , and payment of development impact fees would ensure that impacts would be less than significant.
Parks. The proposed Project would add new residents to the City who would increase the demand for park facilities. The new proposed residential units would exceed the City’s General Plan projections, resulting in an additional 49 dwelling units and approximately 148 new residents. This unplanned growth in population represents approximately 0.0011% of the City’s overall population. The unplanned growth that would exceed General Plan projections represents a very small fraction of the overall City population and therefore, demand on park facilities.
According to the City of Orange General Plan Natural Resources Element the City’s park objective is to reach 3 acres per 1,000 residents. As stated on Page NR-45,
To support these objectives, the City will require dedication of parkland at a rate of 3 acres per 1,000 anticipated residents or payment of in -lieu fees for new residential projects.
Payment of in-lieu fees constitutes sufficient mitigation for parks impacts under California law, and new development projects cannot be required to directly mitigate existing parkland def iciencies. However, the City will utilize fees collected to the fullest extent possible to improve current park facilities and to acquire additional lands for the construction of new parks.
Therefore, p ayment of the park fees offsets impacts from addition al demand placed on park facilities; therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Other Public Facilities. The proposed Project would place additional demands on other public facilities. These facilities range from the City’s library to streets, storm drains, and other public facilities such as City Hall, etc. When a residential development project is newly constructed in an established city, often that project would rely on, and impact, established infrastructure. In those situations, the impacts would be often offset by payment of development impact fees. The City of Orange collects as development impact fees the Transportation System Improvement Program Fee, Park Infill Fee, Fire Protection Facility Fee, Police Facility Development Fee and Library Facilities Development Fee.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 78
Payment of the fees, which are a condition of approval, would reduce impacts on public services to less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant Sources: City of Orange General Plan Public Safety Element and Natural Resources Element; and Annual Financial Reports for development impact fees for Fiscal Year 2021-2022.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 79
5.16 Recreation
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
RECREATION. Would the project:
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Impact Analysis
Existing public park facilities in the vicinity of the proposed Project include Schaffer Park , approximately 0.95 miles northwest of the Project site. The City also has a joint -use agreement with the Orange Unified School District for park use of school facilities outside of school hours .
The California Elementary School and Yorba Middle School campuses are approximately 0.3 miles south of the Project site.
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Less than Significant. The proposed Project would add new residents to the City who would increase the demand for park facilities. The new proposed residential units would exceed the City’s General Plan projections, resulting in an additional 49 dwelling units and approximately 148 new residents. This unplanned growth in population represents approximately
0.0011% of the City’s overall population. The unplanned growth that would exceed General Plan projections represents a very small fraction of the overall City population and therefore, demand on park facilities.
According to the City of Orange General Plan Natural Resources Element the City’s park objective is to reach 3 acres per 1,000 residents. As stated on Page NR-45,
To support these objectives, the City will require dedication of parkland at a rate of 3 acres per 1,000 anticipated residents or payment of in -lieu fees for new residential projects.
Payment of in-lieu fees constitutes sufficient mitigation for parks impacts under California law, and new development projects cannot be required to directly mitigate existing parkland deficiencies. However, the City will utilize fees collected to the fullest extent possible to improve current park facilities and to acquire additional lands for the construction of new parks.
Therefore, payment of the park fees offsets impacts from additional demand placed on park facilities; therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 80
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Less than Significant. The proposed Project is not of sufficient size to require, and does not propose to construct new park facilities, or expand existing park facilities, located outside of the Project site.
As described in a) above, the proposed Project would pay park fees in accordance with the City of Orange Municipal Code and payment of those fees would reduce impacts to less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant Sources: City of Orange Municipal Code; and City of Orange General Plan Natural Resources Element.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 81
5.17 Transportation/Traffic
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines §
15064.3, subdivision (b)? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
d) Result in inadequate emergency access? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Impact Analysis
On September 27, 2013, Senate Bill (SB) 743 was signed into law. The legislature found that with the adoption of the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (SB 375), the state had signaled its commitment to encourage land use and transportation planning decisions and investments that reduce vehicle miles traveled and thereby contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, as required by the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Assembly Bill 32).
SB 743 started a pr ocess that fundamentally changes transportation impact analysis as part of CEQA compliance. Changes include the elimination of auto delay, LOS, and similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as the basis for determining significant impacts. As part of the new CEQA Guidelines, the new criteria were designed to promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses. The Office of Planning and Research (OPR) developed alternative metrics and thresholds based on Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). The guidelines were certified by the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency in December 2018, and automobile delay, as described solely by LOS or similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion, could not be considered a significant impact on the environment.
The City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment (TIAG) were adopted in July 2020. This document sets out the methodology for conducting a Transportation Study and a CEQA VMT (Vehicle Miles Traveled) analysis.
The Orange General Plan includes LOS policy standards for intersections within the City. Because General Plan consistency is often analyzed pursuant to CEQA, and consistency with LOS standards is not a determination of a significant impact, projects should be analyze d to determine if consistency with General Plan LOS standards would lead to the construction of traffic City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 82
improvements, the construction of which would result in an impact to the environment. This is consistent with the following guidance from the Office of Planning and Research.
“Even if a general plan contains an LOS standard and a project is found to exceed that standard, that conflict should not be analyzed under CEQA. CEQA is focused on planning conflicts that lead to environmental impacts. (The Highway 68 Coalition v. County of Monterey (2017) 14 Cal.App.5 th 883; see, e.g., Appendix G, IX(b) [asking whether the project will “Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose o f avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?”].) Auto delay, on its own, is no longer an environmental impact under CEQA. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21099(b)(2).)”
While VMT is the preferred quantitative metric for assessing potentially significant transportation impacts under CEQA, it should be noted that SB 743 does not prevent a city or county from using metrics such as LOS as part of the application of local general plan policies, municipal and zoning codes, conditions of approval, or any other p lanning requirements through a city’s planning approval process; cities can still ensure adequate operation of the transportation system in terms of transportation congestion measures related to vehicular delay and roadway capacity. As such, the City continues to require congestion-related transportation analysis and project changes to LOS at an intersection(s) that result in a potential safety impact or hazardous condition should also be analyzed pursuant to CEQA.
The TIAG includes screening criteria for both LOS and VMT analyses. For LOS, a project that meets any of the criteria shall prepare a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA).
• When either the AM or PM peak hour trip generation is expected to exceed 100 vehicle trips from the proposed development.
• Projects on the Arterial Highway System which generate 1,600 Average Daily Trips (ADT).
• Projects that will add 51 or more trips during either the AM or PM peak hours to any intersection.
• Any project where variations from the standards and guidelines pr ovided in this manual are being proposed.
• When determined by the City Traffic Engineer that existing or proposed traffic conditions in the project vicinity have unique characteristics that warrant evaluation.
For VMT, a VMT assessment is required for projects that do not satisfy one of the identified project screening criteria:
• Transit Priority Areas Screening
• Low VMT-generating Areas Screening
• Project Type Screening
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 83
- Certain Land uses
- Projects generating less than 110 daily trips
Transportation impacts, both VMT and LOS, have been analyzed in the report s 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Project (TTM 19253) Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis, City of Orange, CA, prepared by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, dated October 14, 2022 and included in Appendix J, 901 E. Katella Avenue In -Fill Residential Project (TTM 19253) Trip Generation Analysis, City of Orange, CA , prepared by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, dated October 14, 2022 and included in Appendix K, and Site Distance Analysis for the 901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, Orange, CA, prepared by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, dated July 22, 2022 and included in Appendix L.
As described in detail in Table 2 of the Trip Generation Analysis, the proposed Project would have a net trip generation of 353 average daily trips (ADT), with 24 trips in the AM Peak Hour and 28 trips in the PM Peak Hour. Since the proposed Project would generate less than 51 peak hour trips, the Project is screened from further LOS analysis.
Furthermore, the Project is also screened from further VMT analysis because the Project occurs in a low VMT generating area.
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Less than Significant. The City’s General Plan Circulation and Mobility Element includes “Goal 1.0”, and numerous related policies, to “Provide a safe, efficient, and comprehensive circulation system that serves local needs, meets forecasted demands, and sustains quality of life in neighborhoods.” The proposed Project is consistent with that goal by providing a residential neighborhood in a location adjacent to existing roadways that facilitate both automobile and pedestrian movement. The proposed Project would replace an abandoned commercial use and provide residential housing within close proximity to commercial uses, facilitating pedestrian mobility between commercial and residential uses. The proposed Project also generates less peak hour traffic (AM = 24 trips and PM = 28 trips) than the City’s screening threshold (51+ peak hour trips) and is therefore exempt from further analysis of automobile delay at intersections thereby avoiding improvements that could cause environmental impacts, as described in (c) below. Therefore, the proposed Project is consistent with the adopted plans and policies pertaining to the entire circulation system. Impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines § 15064.3, subdivision (b)? Less than Significant. The City’s TIAG requires a VMT analysis unless the Project meets one of three screening criteria, which include transit priority area screening, low VMT area screening, and project type screening. Furthermore, the City of Orange VMT Guidelines states that a project would result in a significant project -generated VMT impact if either of the following conditions are satisfied.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 84
1. The baseline project-generated VMT per service population exceeds the City of Orange General Plan Buildout VMT per service population, or
2. The cumulative project -generated VMT per service population exceeds the City of Orange General Plan Buildout VMT per service population.
As document in the report 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Project (TTM 19253) Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis, City of Orange, CA , prepared by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, dated October 14, 2022, and included in Appendix J, the VMT per Service Population within the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) for the Project site would be 15.4 VMT. For the same TAZ, the VMT per Service Population for the City of Orange General Plan Build Out is 31.3 VMT. Since the VMT per Service Population for the proposed Project is less than the VMT per Service Population for the City of Orange General Plan Build Out, the proposed Project is screened from further VMT analysis and the Project’s impact on VMT would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Driveways into the Project site currently exis t from Cambridge Street and E. Katella Avenue. Those existing driveways would be used for the proposed residential Project, except the driveway along E. Katella would move farther east, away from the Cambridge/Katella intersection. No other roadway improvements would be made, or are required, by the Project.
Although existing, the Project driveway on Cambridge Street is close to the Cambridge/Katella intersection. A potential hazard could occur with cars exiting the Project site and making a left turn on to Cambridge Street. Given the potential impact, a sight distance analysis was prepared for that intersection ( Site Distance Analysis for the 901 E. Katella Avenue Residential Project, Orange, CA , prepared by Linscott, Law, & Gree nspan, dated July 22, 2022 and included in Appendix L ). The sight distance analysis used the criteria and procedures included in the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) State Highway Design Manual (HDM) for “Private Road Intersections.” Stop ping sight distance is defined in the Caltrans HDM to be the distance required by the driver of a vehicle, traveling at a given speed, to bring the vehicle to a stop after an object ½ foot high on the road becomes visible. Stopping sight distance is measur ed from the driver’s eyes, which is assumed to be 3 ½ feet above the pavement surface, to an object ½ foot high on the road. The speed used in determining stopping sight distance is defined as the “critical speed” or 85th percentile speed which is the spee d at which 85% of the vehicles are traveling at or less. The critical speed is the single most important factor in determining stopping sight distance.
Based on this methodology, both outbound left and right turns were evaluated. Only inbound left turns from Cambridge were analyzed since inbound right turns would have no potential impact.
The analysis determined that sufficient sight distance exists for both outbound movements.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 85
However, for the inbound left turn movement, the analysis determined that the sight lines could be obstructed by vehicles queued in the southbound left-turn lane and/or southbound through lane at the intersection of Cambridge Street and Katella Avenue. Therefore, a significant impact could occur as a result of creating a dangerous tu rning movement. Mitigation Measure MM TRANS- 1 has been included to mitigate this impact by restricting left turn movements from southbound Cambridge into the Project site.
The driveway inbound and outbound from E. Katella does not pose the same turning mo vement hazard. While E. Katella is an arterial roadway with substantial traffic volume, a striped center median currently exists that provides an area of refuge for vehicles making left turns into and out of properties along both sides of E. Katella. The proposed Project would rely on this center painted median to facilitate left turns into and left turns out of the Project site. Therefore, similar to the other existing properties and businesses along E. Katella Avenue, access from E. Katella to and from the Project site is not considered a hazardous condition. No access restrictions or mitigation measures would be required.
No other roadway improvements are required by the proposed Project. The proposed Project generates less peak hour traffic (AM = 24 tr ips and PM = 28 trips) than the City’s screening threshold (51+ peak hour trips) and is therefore exempt from further analysis of automobile delay at intersections thereby avoiding improvements that could cause environmental impacts .
Therefore, the proposed Project does not cause any substantial changes to the operation of surrounding intersections such that the intersections would not perform properly, or improvements would be necessary, and no new hazardous conditions would be created.
With implementation of Mitigation Measure MM TRANS-1 impacts would be reduced to less than significant.
Significance Determination: Potentially Significant
Mitigation Measures: Implement MM TRANS-1.
Mitigation Measure MM TRANS -1: The Project Applicant shall install striping modifications or signage to prohibit the southbound left turn movement from Cambridge Street into the Project.
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated
d) Result in inadequate emergenc y access? Less than Significant. The Project site is bordered by Cambridge Street and E. Katella Avenue and surrounding residential and commercial development. According to the City’s General Plan Public Safety Element, Figure PS -4, Generalized Evacuation Corridors, the closest emergency evacuation routes to the Project site include E. Katella Avenue, adjacent to the Project site, and Glassell Street, west of the Project site.
These emergency access routes would remain unchanged by the proposed Project and the proposed Project would not interfere with an emergency response plan. Furthermore, during site plan review, the Orange Fire Department determined the proposed Project provides sufficient on -site emergency access. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 86
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant Sources: 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Project (TTM 19253) Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis, City of Orange, CA, prepared by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, dated October 14, 2022 and included in Appendix J ; 901 E. Katella Avenue In-Fill Residential Project (TTM 19253) Trip Generation Analysis, City of Orange, CA, prepared by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, dated October 14, 2022 and included in Appendix K; City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment (TIAG) dated July; and City of Orange General Plan Public Safety Element, Figure PS-4.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 87
5.18 Tribal Cultural Resources
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project
cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code § 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public Resources
Code section 5020.1(k), or
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code § 5024.1. In applying the
criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code § 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe.
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
Impact Analysis
Cultural and paleontological resource assessments were prepared for the Project site. The Cultural Resources Study, 901 East Katella Avenue Project, City of Orange, Orange County California , prepared by BFSA Environmental Services, dated September 7, 2023, is included in Appendix C.
The Paleontological Resources Study, Paleontological Assessment for the 901 East Katella Avenue Project, dated September 7, 2023 , by BFSA Environmental Services is included in Appendix E.
Pursuant to AB 52, the City provided notification of the proposed Project to the Native American Historical Commission (NAHC) and notification letters were sent to the following tribes on August 7, 2023: Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation, Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, and Gabrielino/Tongva Nation . The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation requested consultation and telephone consultation occurred with the City on August 17, 2023, which concluded consultation. The Gabrielino/Tongva Nation also requested consultation and telephone consultation occurred with the City on September 28, 2023, which concluded consultation . No other tribes requested co nsultation and the consultation period ended on September 28, 2023.
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k). Less than Significant. The Project site was developed in the early 1970’s with a commercial/office building, which was first used by Pacific Telephone Company of San Ana and later AT&T. The style of the building was influenced by International -style architecture. International style City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 88
architecture was a major world -wide architectural trend of the 1920s and 30s and reflects the formative decades of Modernism prior to World War II. (BFSA, p. 3.0-7) Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, the building was assessed to determine the historical significance of the structure. The California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) eligibility criteria were used to determine if the building is eligible for listing and thus, the building’s historical significance.
To be eligible for listing on the CRHR, the resource must be found significant under one or more of the following criteria:
• CRHR Criterion 1: It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage.
• CRHR Criterion 2: It is associated with the lives of persons important in our past.
• CRHR Criterion 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction; represents the work of an important creative individual; or possesses high artistic values.
• CRHR Criterion 4: It has yielded, or may be likely to yield, in formation important in prehistory or history.
The evaluation of the four CRHR criteria are presented in the Cultural Resources Study for the 901 East Katella Avenue Project, City of Orange, Orange County California , prepared by BFSA Environmental Services , dated October 26, 2022, and included in Appendix C. The analysis determined the existing building is a common example of early 1970’s office/commercial buildings possessing limited integrity. While influenced by the International Style architecture, the building is not a very good example and not considered architecturally important. The building is not associated with any significant events or individuals and is not likely to provide any information important to the history of the regio n. Therefore, the existing structure is not considered a historical resource and impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code § 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code § 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Tribal consultation with the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation concluded on August 17, 2023, following a telephone conference call. Furthermore, consultation with the Gabrielino/Tongva Nation concluded on September 28, 2023, following a telephone conference call. The tribal consultation concluded with a request for the City to impose its standard tribal cultural resource mitigation measures on the proposed Project given the potential to discover tribal cultural resources. No other City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 89
tribes requested consultation and the consultation period ended on September 28, 2023. Mitigation Measures MM TRC-1 through MM TRC-3 shall be implemented.
Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM TRC -1 through MM TRC -3 would reduce impacts to tribal cultural resources to less than significant.
Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: Implement MM TRC-1 through MM TRC - 3.
Mitigation Measure MM TRC -1: Retain a Native American Monitor Prior to Commencement of Ground-Disturbing Activities
A. The project applicant/lead agency shall retain a Native American Monitor from or approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation and the Gabrielino/Tongva Nation. The monitors shall be retained prior to the commencement of any “ground-disturbing activity” for the subject project at all project locations (i.e., both on-site and any off -site locations that are included in the project description/definition and/or required in connection with the project, such as public improvement work). “Ground-disturbing activity” shall include, but is not limited to, demolition, pavement removal, potholing, auguring, grubbing, tree removal, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching.
B. A copy of the executed monitoring agreement s with Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation and Gabrielino/Tongva Nation shall be submitted to the lead agency prior to the earlier of the commencement of any ground -disturbing activity, or the issuance of any permit necessary to commence a ground-disturbing activity.
C. The monitor s will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the relevant ground -disturbing activities, the type of construction activities performed, locations of ground -disturbing activities, soil types, cultural -related material s, and any other facts, conditions, materials, or discoveries of significance to the Tribe. Monitor logs will identify and describe any discovered TCRs, including but not limited to, Native American cultural and historical artifacts, remains, places of sig nificance, etc., (collectively, tribal cultural resources, or “TCR”), as well as any discovered Native American (ancestral) human remains and burial goods. Copies of monitor logs will be provided to the project applicant/lead agency upon written request to the Tribes.
D. On-site tribal monitoring shall conclude upon the latter of the following (1) written confirmation to the Kizh and Gabrielino/Tongva Nation from a designated point of contact for the project applicant/lead agency that all ground -disturbing activities and phases that may involve ground -disturbing activities on the project site or in connection with the project are complete; or (2) a determination and written notification by the Kizh and Gabrielino/Tongva Nation to the project applicant/lead a gency that no future, planned construction activity and/or development/construction phase at the project site possesses the potential to impact Kizh and Gabrielino/Tongva Nation TCRs.
Mitigation Measure MM TRC -2: Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultura l Resource Objects (Non-Funerary/Non-Ceremonial)
A. Upon discovery of any TCRs, all construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall cease (i.e., not less than the surrounding 50 feet) and shall not resume until the discovered TCR has been fully assessed by the Kizh monitor and/or Kizh archaeologist.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 90
The Kizh will recover and retain all discovered TCRs in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate, in the Tribe’s sole discretion, and for any purpose the Tribe deems appropriate, including for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes.
Mitigation Measure MM TRC -3: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary or Ceremonial Objects
A. Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhum ation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute.
B. If Native American human remains an d/or grave goods are discovered or recognized on the project site, then Public Resource Code 5097.9 as well as Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 shall be followed.
C. Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be treated alike per California Public Resources Code section 5097.98(d)(1) and (2).
D. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment for discovered human remains and/or burial goods.
E. Any discovery of human remains/burial goods shall be kept confidential to prevent further disturbance.
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated
Sources: 901 East Katella Avenue Project, City of Orange, Orange County California, prepared by BFSA Environmental Services, dated September 7, 2023, (Appendix C); and Paleontological Assessment for the 901 East Katella Avenue Project, dated October 25, 2022, by BFSA Environmental Services (Appendix E).
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 91
5.19 Utilities and Service Systems
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development
during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ Impact Analysis
The proposed Project would be served by the City of Orange water and sewer. A Will Serve letter for domestic water service is included in Appendix M. A Sewer Capacity Study prepared by C&V Consulting, Inc. dated August 18, 2022, is included in Appendix N.
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natur al gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less than Significant. The proposed Project would connect to existing water and sewer facilities located within the adjacent streets. The domestic water main along the Project frontage of East Katella Avenue and Cambridge Street will be upgraded from a 6 -inch line to an 8 -inch line. Both the water and wastewater tr eatment systems have sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed Project. The City issued a Will Serve letter for domestic water service on June 22, 2022, committing to serve the proposed Project.
A Sewer Capacity Study was prepared (Appendix N) to d etermine the potential impact of the Project on the existing sewer system. An existing 15 -inch public sewer main is located with E.
Katella Avenue adjacent to the Project site. Average daily flows were calculated for the existing and proposed condition, wh ich determined the depth of the flows within the sewer main would increase by approximately 0.0013 feet (0.0156 inches) with a calculated d/D of 0.4382. Therefore, City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 92
in the proposed condition, the depth of flows within the sewer main would remain less than 5 0% of capacity.
Dry utilities, including electric, natural gas, and telecommunications, are also available within adjacent streets and available to serve the proposed Project. Will Serve letters for dry utilities are also included in Appendix M. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Less than Significant. The City of Orange provides potable water to its residents and would serve the proposed Project. The City is a member agency of The Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) with five other jurisdictions, which led to annexation to the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The City has a number of service connection agreements with MWDOC, which allows the City to receive water from MWDOC as MWDOC receives water from Metropolitan.
The City issued a Will Serve letter for domestic water service on June 22, 2022 , committing to provide water service to the proposed Project and the City’s commitment to serve the proposed Project is consistent with the City’s Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), including normal, dry, and multiple dry years. Impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Less than Significant. The Project site is served by regional trunk lines owned by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). OCSD is responsible for the treatment of residential, commercial and industrial sewage in Orange. Collected effluent is treated at Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley or Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach.
To respond to the increased need for sewage treatment in Orange County, OCSD needs to replace aging regional collection and treatment infrastructure and build additional secondary treatment facilities. A portion of the sewage fee charged to developers in the City of Orange will be paid to the OCSD for improvements of regional facilities, which are currently strained by the County’s rapidly growing population. A Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, designed to fund improvements in the efficiency and effectiveness of OCSD operations, is applied to cities and developers for new residential, commercial, or industrial development and/or expansion of existing facilities.
The City of Orange completed a Sewer Master Plan Update in 2003. In order to improve the reliability and efficiency of the sewer system, the City plans to replace older sewer lines. The new City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 93
lines will maintain, and in some cases increase, the City’s sewer line capacity, and provide adequate sewer collection for the future.
Therefore, while the proposed Project would increase wastewater demand, sufficient capacity exists and fee programs are in place to add future treatment capacity. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Less than Significant. The City of Orange contracts with CR&R for waste and recycling services.
CR&R and the City have an extensive program designed to recycle trash consistent with state regulations. The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939), which emphasizes resource conservation through reduction, recycling, and reuse of solid waste. The City of Orange achieves waste reduction through resident curbside recycling, which includes separate carts for refuse, recyclables, and green waste.
The State of California has set an ambitious goal of 75% recycling, composting or source reduction of solid waste by 2020. The City of Orange and CR&R have launched an expanded Organics Recycling Program for residents with cart service , such as the proposed Project. This requires changes in how residents and businesses sort their organics waste. Organic waste is mainly comprised of food scraps and yard waste such as green waste, landscape, and pruning waste. It will be transported to CR&R’s Regional Organics Anaerobic Recovery (ROAR) facility where technology will convert food scraps and yard waste into renewable natural gas and compost.
Each residential dwelling would be supplied with three trash carts (refuse, recyclables, and green waste). The Project’s Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) would require that each resident store trash carts in the garage or in a fenced yard area, out of sight of other residences and Association Property, until scheduled collection times. Residents are therefore responsible for separating waste into the three bins, including yard waste from the private outdoor space of each dwelling. Waste generated from the common area, which is maintained by the Association, would generally include trash and green waste. The Association’s contractors, generally landscape contractors, would collect the green waste and refuse from common area (Association) property and dispose of the green waste at a ROAR or equivalent green waste recycling facility and the refuse at a landfill.
Waste that cannot be disposed of would likely be taken to one of the three landfills in Orange County: Olinda Alpha in Brea, the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill in Irvine, and the Prima Deshecha Landfill in San Juan Capistrano. The Orange County Integrated Waste Management Department (IWMD) owns and operates the landfills . The Olinda Alpha landfill has capacity until approximately 2030 and averages 7,000 tons per day (TPD). The Frank R. Bowerman Landfill has capacity until approximately 2053 and averages 8,500 TPD. The Prima Deshecha landfill has City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 94
capacity until approximately 2102. Therefore, sufficient capacity is available to serve the proposed Project. Impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less than Significant. The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, also known as Assembly Bill 939 (AB 939), mandates jurisdictions to meet a diversion goal of 50 percent by the year 2000, and thereafter. Senate Bill (SB) 1383 is a bill that sets goals to reduce disposal of organic waste in landfills, including edible food. The bill’s purpose is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, such as methane, and address food insecurity in California.
The City implements programs applicable to the proposed Project that comply with these statutes.
One strategy required of residents of residential communities, such as the proposed Project, is curbside separation of trash into recyclable, green waste, and solid waste. The City recently began a pilot program call Recycle From Home, which allows residents to be paid for recycling cans and bottles from their home instead of taking the bott les and cans to a redemption center. Collection bags and QR code tracking labels are provided to residents to sort aluminum cans, plastic, and glass bottles. The City also implements free disposal days, Christmas tree collection, household hazardous waste centers, used oil collection centers. Furthermore, the City’s Green Building Program’s requires recycling and diversion from landfills, which would apply during construction of the proposed Project.
Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with federal, state, and local ordinances in place designed to reduce solid waste generation. Impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant Sources: City of Orange Public Works, Residential Trash, Recycling, and Organics | City of Orange, CA; City of Orange General Plan EIR; City of Orange General Plan Infrastructure Element; Orange County Integrated Waste Management, About OC Waste & Recycling | OC Waste & Recycling (oclandfills.com); and CalRecycle, New Statewide Mandatory Organic Waste Collection - CalRecycle Home Page.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 95
5.20 Wildfire
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
WILDFIRE. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire
or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency
water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flo oding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Impact Analysis
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less than Significant. The Proposed Project site is not located in or adjacent to land classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. Neither the City of Orange General Plan Public Safety Element, Figure PS-1 nor the Cal Fire – Fire and Resource Assessment Program list the Project site within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? Less than Significant. The proposed Project would not exacerbate fire risks.
The proposed Project is located within an urban area surrounded by residential and commercial development, and arterial roadways. A ll new structures would comply with current building standards, including fire sprinklers. Therefore, the proposed Project would not exacerbate fire risk to surrounding properties or to the new residents of the Project site. Fires in the general Orange and County of Orange areas could expose occupants to smoke during a wildfire. This risk is temporary and would not be exacerbated by the proposed Project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 96
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? Less than Significant.
The Project site is not located in or adjacent to land classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. Neither the City of Orange General Plan Public Safety Element, PS-1 nor the Cal Fire – Fire and Resource Assessment Program list the Project site within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone . No fuel modification, fire breaks, etc. are required of the proposed Project .
Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Less than Significant. The Project site currently consists of a nearly flat area . Furthermore, the Project site is surrounded by existing streets and residential and commercial development approximately the same elevation as the Project site. The Project site is not located adjacent to any large hillsides that could cause flooding, mudflows, landslides, or sig nificant erosion after a fire.
Impacts would be less than significant.
Significance Determination: Less than Significant
Mitigation Measures: None
Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less than Significant Sources: City of Orange General Plan Public Safety Element, Figure PS-1; and Cal Fire – Fire and Resource Assessment Program, Fire Hazard Severity Zones (ca.gov).
City of Orange
901 E. Katella Residential Project IS/MND Page 97
5.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self -
sustaining levels, threate n to eliminate a plant or
animal community, substantially reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.)
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
c) Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
Impact Analysis
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self -sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a p lant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. As discussed in the Biological Resources Section, the proposed Project has no potential to impact special status species or habitat supporting special status species. The Project would however potentially result in significant impacts to biological r esources from impacts to nesting birds . As such, the proposed Project would incorporate Mitigation Measure MM BIO-1, to reduce the potential impact to nesting birds to a less than significant level. Additionally, as discussed in the Cultural Resources Section, no newly or previously recorded historic sites were identified within the Project site as a result of the records search, archival research, or the intensive-level pedestrian survey. Therefore, the proposed Project would not alter, destroy or adversely affect a historic site. However, due to the moderate sensitivity of a paleontological resource occurring onsite, the proposed Project would incorporate Mitigation Measure PALEO-1. Through consultation with the Native American tribes, a potential for tribal cultural resources exists on the Project site. Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM TRC- 1 through TRC -3 would reduce all cultural resource impacts to a less t han significant level.