Agenda packet — Orange City Council, January 14, 2025 (part 1 of 3)

Tom Kisela
City Manager
Mike Vigliotta
City Attorney
Pamela Coleman
City Clerk

DAN SLATER
Mayor

DENIS BILODEAU
Mayor pro tem, District 4

ARIANNA BARRIOS
Councilmember, District 1

JON DUMITRU
Councilmember, District 2

KATHY TAVOULARIS
Councilmember, District 3

ANA GUTIERREZ
Councilmember, District 5

JOHN GYLLENHAMMER
Councilmember, District 6
AGENDA
City Council
January 14, 2025
Joint Meeting with the
Successor Agency to the
Orange Redevelopment Agency
5:00 PM Closed Session
6:00 PM Regular Session
City Council Chamber
300 E. Chapman Avenue
Orange, CA 92866
The City of Orange City Council welcomes you to this meeting and encourages your participation. Regular City Council meetings are held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 6:00 p.m.

Agenda Information
The agenda contains a brief general description of each item to be considered. The City Council may take legislative action deemed appropriate with respect to the item and is not limited to the recommended action indicated in staff reports or the agenda. The agenda and supporting documentation is available after 4:00 p.m. on the Thursday prior to the Council meeting on the City's website at www .cityoforange.org, at the City Clerk's Office located at 300 E. Chapman Avenue, and at the Main Public Library located at 407 E. Chapman Avenue. Written materials relating to an item on the agenda that are provided to the City Council after agenda packet distribution and within 72 hours before Council is to consider the item will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office during normal business hours; at the City Council meeting; and made available on the City's website.

Public Participation
Regular meetings are televised live on Spectrum Cable Channel 3 and AT&T U -verse Channel 99, and streamed live and on-demand on the City's website at www.cityoforange.org.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.3, members of the public may address the City Council on any agenda item before or during Council ’s consideration of the item and on any other matters within the City Council’s jurisdiction by using any of the following methods:
1) In-Person
To speak on an item on the agenda, complete a speaker card indicating your name, address, and identify the agenda item number or subject matter you wish to address. The card should be given to the City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. General comments are received during the “Public Comments” section at the beginning of the Regular Session. No action may be taken on off -agenda items unless authorized by law .

Page 1 of 9 ends

1 City Council Agenda January 14, 2025
Public Comments are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker unless a different time limit is announced. It is requested that you state your name for the record, then proceed to address the City Council. All speakers shall observe civility, decorum, and good behavior.
2) Written Public Comments via eComment
Members of the public can submit their written comments electronically for City Council consideration by using the eComment feature on the Agenda page of the City's website at www .cityoforange.org. To ensure distribution to the City Council prior to consideration of the agenda, we encourage the public to submit written comments by 3:00 p.m. the day of the meeting. All written comments will be provided to the Council for consideration and posted on the City’s website after the meeting. 3) Public Comments via recorded voicemail message
Finally, the public can record their comments by calling (714) 744-2234 no later than 5:00 p.m. the day of the meeting. Recorded messages will not be played at the meeting, but will be provided to the Council.

In accordance with Ordinance No. 10-01, any person making personal, impertinent, slanderous or profane remarks or who becomes boisterous while addressing the Council shall be called to order by the Mayor. If such conduct continues, the Mayor may order the person barred from addressing the City Council further during that meeting, unless permission to continue is granted by a majority vote of the Council.

Please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 744-5500 with any questions.

ADA Requirements: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (714) 744-5500. Notification at least 48 hours in advance of meeting will enable the City to make arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting.

REMINDER: Please silence all electronic devices while City Council is in session.

Page 2 of 9 ends

2 City Council Agenda January 14, 2025
5:00 PM CLOSED SESSION

1. CALL TO ORDER

1.1 ROLL CALL

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
At this time, members of the public may address the Council on Closed Session items only. Public Comments are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker.

3. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
a. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) & (d)(1) - Three cases 1) Name of Case: Susanne Elizabeth D’Arcy v. Thomas J. Rothenberger, et al.

Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2020-01150553
2) Name of Case: Californians for Homeownership v. City of Orange Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2024-01382115
3) Name of Case: The Orange JCP Project Owner, LLC v. City of Orange Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2024-01415352
b. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Property Location: 171 and 177 N. Cypress Street
Agency Negotiator: Aaron Schulze, Economic Development Manager Negotiating Parties: Evan Clark
Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment
Property Location: 307 E. Chapman Avenue
Agency Negotiator: Aaron Schulze, Economic Development Manager Negotiating Parties: Hicham Semaan
Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment
c. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)1
Title: City Manager

4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT

5. ADJOURNMENT
The City Council will adjourn to the 6:00 p.m. Regular Session in the Council Chamber.

Page 3 of 9 ends

3 City Council Agenda January 14, 2025
6:00 PM REGULAR SESSION

1. OPENING/CALL TO ORDER

1.1 INVOCATION
Pastor Ric Olsen, The Beacon Church

1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Jon Dumitru

1.3 ROLL CALL

1.4 PRESENTATIONS/ANNOUNCEMENTS
Introduction of Miss Orange 2025 contestants

1.5 REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
At this time, members of the public may address the Council on matters not listed on the agenda within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, provided that NO action may be taken on off -agenda items unless authorized by law. Public Comments are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker unless a different time limit is announced.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and are enacted by one motion approving the recommended action listed on the Agenda. Any member of the City Council, staff, or the public may request an item be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion or separate action. Unless otherwise specified in the request to remove an item from the Consent Calendar, all items removed shall be considered immediately following action on the remaining items on the Consent Calendar.

3.1. Waive reading in full of all ordinances on the agenda.

Approve.

Recommended Action:

Staff ReportAttachments:

3.2. Confirmation of accounts payable warrant registers dated December 5, 12, and 19, 2024 and payroll check warrants dated December 6, and 20, 2024.

Ratify the accompanying registers.

Recommended Action:

Page 4 of 9 ends

4 City Council Agenda January 14, 2025
Staff Report
December 6, 2024 Payroll Warrant Information
December 20, 2024 Payroll Warrant Information
December 5, 2024 Warrant Writing Register
December 12, 2024 Warrant Writing Register
December 19, 2024 Warrant Writing Register
Attachments:

3.3. Approval of minutes of the City of Orange City Council Regular Meeting held on December 10, 2024.

Approve minutes as presented.

Recommended Action:

Staff Report
December 10, 2024, Regular Meeting minutes
Attachments:

3.4. First Amendment to Attorney Services Agreement with Law Offices of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore to provide legal services relating to personnel matters.

Approve the First Amendment to Attorney Services Agreement with the Law Offices of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore in the amount of $ 70,000; and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute on behalf of the City.

Recommended Action:

Staff Report
First Amendment to Attorney Services Agreement
Attachments:

3.5. Participate in a one -time Public Provider Ground Emergency Medical Transportation Intergovernmental Transfer Program with the California Department of Health Care Services.

Approve agreements with the California Department of Health Care Services in the amount of $ 1,100,000, plus a $ 110,000 assessment fee to the California Department of Health Care Services for managing the Public Provider Ground Emergency Medical Transportation program, payable in quarterly Intergovernmental Transfers; and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute on behalf of the City.

Recommended Action:

Staff Report
Attachment 1 DHCS IGT Certification Form for CY 2025
Attachment 2 DHCS CY 2025 Invoice #1
Attachment 3 Assembly Bill 1705 (AB 1705)
Attachments:

3.6. Approval of the submittal of a project funding application to Orange County Transportation Authority for competitive Measure M 2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program. Resolution No. 11590.

Page 5 of 9 ends

5 City Council Agenda January 14, 2025
Adopt Resolution No. 11590. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange approving the submittal of improvement projects to the Orange County Transportation Authority for funding under the competitive Measure M 2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program.

Recommended Action:

Staff Report
Attachment 1 Resolution No. 11590
Attachment 2 Map of State College Blvd/The City Drive RTSSP Corridor
Attachments:

3.7. Authorization for the Director of Public Works to sign and file a financial assistance application for a financing agreement with the California State Water Resources Control Board for the City of Orange Wells 25 and 27 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances Treatment Systems. Resolution No. 11591.

Adopt Resolution No. 11591. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange authorizing a representative to sign and file a financial assistance application for a financing and grant agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board for City of Orange Wells 25 and 27 PFAS Treatment Plant.

Recommended Action:

Staff Report
Resolution No. 11591
Attachments:

3.8. Authorization for designated City personnel to execute documents for federal financial assistance for the Department of Homeland Security ’s Emergency Management Performance Grant program for Fiscal Years 2023, 2024, and 2025.

Resolution No. 11592.

Adopt Resolution No .11592. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange authorizing the execution of documents for federal financial assistance for the emergency management performance grant program for Fiscal Year 2023, Fiscal Year 2024, and Fiscal Year 2025.

Recommended Action:

Staff Report
Resolution No. 11592
Attachments:

3.9. Appointment of City Councilmembers to Regional Boards and Committees.

Confirm City Councilmember appointments to regional boards and committees as listed on the attachment.

Recommended Action:

Staff Report
Current Councilmember appointments to City Regional Boards and Committees
Attachments:

Page 6 of 9 ends

6 City Council Agenda January 14, 2025

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE ORANGE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

3.10. Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the fiscal period covering July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026. Resolution No. SAORA-038.

1. Adopt Resolution No. SAORA-038, A Resolution of the Governing Board of the Successor Agency to the Orange Redevelopment Agency approving a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the fiscal period covering July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177, and taking certain related actions.

2. Direct staff to transmit ROPS 25-26 and related Administrative Budgets to the Orange Countywide Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to the Orange Redevelopment Agency.

Recommended Action:

Staff Report
Resolution No. SAORA-038
Attachments:

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
* * * * * * * *

4. REPORTS FROM MAYOR SLATER

5. REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS
An opportunity for Councilmembers to make a brief announcement, report, or request .

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a)(3), no action (s) or discussion (s) shall be undertaken on any item not appearing on the posted agenda.

5.1. Citywide Audit (Gutierrez)

5.2. Annexation of County Islands (Gutierrez)

5.3. Council Committee Reports (Gutierrez)

5.4. Highlight Local Business (Barrios & Gutierrez)

6. AB 1234 REPORTS
This is the time for all AB 1234 reports required pursuant to Government Code Section 53232.3(d) on meetings and conferences attended at the City's expense.

7. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER

8. PUBLIC HEARINGS

8.1. A Public Hearing to consider an amendment to the Orange General Plan including substantive updates to the Safety Element to comply with new State law, minor non- substantive text and graphic updates to additional Elements of the General Plan, and finding of CEQA exemption (General Plan Amendment No .

Page 7 of 9 ends

7 City Council Agenda January 14, 2025
2024-0002). Resolution No. 11589.

1. Conduct and close Public Hearing.

2. Adopt Resolution No. 11589. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange approving General Plan Amendment No. 2024-0002 amending the City of Orange General Plan Safety Element to comply with State law, and making non -substantive updates to City policies, text, and graphics to the remaining General Plan Elements and implementation plan to maintain document accuracy.

3. Find the proposal exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3), 15168(c), and 15162.

Recommended Action:

Staff Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 11589
Attachment 2 - Amended General Plan and Implementation Plan text and graphics (redline version)
Attachment 3 - Planning Commission Resolution No. PC 32-24 Attachment 4 - Planning Commission Staff Report, dated November 4, 2024
Attachment 5 - Draft Planning Commission Minutes, November 4, 2024
Attachment 6 - Cal Fire Board of Forestry and Fire Prevention Assessment
Attachment 7 - Fire Severity Zones Map
Attachments:

9. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS

9.1. Agreement with the Orange International Street Fair, Inc. to produce the annual Orange Street Fair.

1. Receive and file a report from the Orange International Street Fair, Inc. regarding the 2024 Orange Street Fair.

2. Approve the agreement with the Orange International Street Fair, Inc. to produce the annual Orange Street Fair; and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute on behalf of the City.

Recommended Action:

Staff Report
Agreement with Orange International Street Fair, Inc.

Attachments:

9.2. Employment Agreement with a retired annuitant for the vacant position of Interim Police Chief, pursuant to Government Code Sections 21221(h) and 7522.56(f).

Resolution No. 11594.

Adopt Resolution No. 11594. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange approving the Employment Agreement of a retired annuitant for the position of Interim Police Chief, pursuant to Government Code Sections 21221(h) and 7522.56(f).

Recommended Action:

Page 8 of 9 ends

8 City Council Agenda January 14, 2025
Staff Report
Resolution No. 11594
Attachments:

10. LEGAL AFFAIRS

10.1. Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No. 01-25 amending the Orange Municipal Code as it relates to safe and sane fireworks; and adoption of a resolution establishing a fee, application process, lottery process, and number of permits to sell safe and sane fireworks. Resolution No. 11593.

1. Introduce and conduct First Reading of Ordinance No. 01-25. An Ordinance of the City of Orange amending Chapter 8.13 of the Orange Municipal Code adopting rules and regulations regarding the sale, possession, and discharge of safe and sane fireworks and amending sections of Ordinance 07-22 of the Orange City Fire Code relating to safe and sane fireworks.

2. Adopt Resolution No. 11593. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange, California, establishing a fee and adopting rules and regulations regarding the number of permits as well as the application and lottery process to sell “safe and sane” fireworks pursuant to Orange Municipal Code Chapter 8.13.

Recommended Action:

Staff Report
Ordinance No. 01-25
Resolution No. 11593
Attachments:

11. ADJOURNMENT
The next Regular City Council meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 28, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber, with Closed Session beginning at 5:00 p.m., if necessary.

I, Pamela Coleman, CMC, City Clerk for the City of Orange, do hereby declare, under penalty of perjury, that a full and correct copy of this agenda was posted pursuant to Government Code Section 54950 et. seq., at the following locations: Orange Civic Center kiosk and Orange City Clerk's Office at 300 E. Chapman Avenue, Orange Main Public Library at 407 E. Chapman Avenue, Police facility at 1107 N. Batavia Street, and uploaded to the City's website www.cityoforange.org.

Date posted: January 9, 2025

Page 9 of 9 ends

9 Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.1. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0030
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Pamela Coleman, City Clerk/City Clerk Services Director

1. SUBJECT
Waive reading in full of all ordinances on the agenda.

2. SUMMARY
This item asks the City Council to waive the reading in full of all ordinances on the agenda (if any) and approve their reading by title only.

State law requires that all ordinances be read in full either at the time of the introduction or at the time of passage, unless a motion waiving further reading is adopted by a majority of the City Council (Gov.

Code § 36934).

3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve.

4. ATTACHMENTS
· None
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
10 Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.1. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0030
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Pamela Coleman, City Clerk/City Clerk Services Director

1. SUBJECT
Waive reading in full of all ordinances on the Agenda.

2. SUMMARY
This item asks the City Council to waive the reading in full of all ordinances on the agenda (if any) and approve their reading by title only.

Code § 36934).

3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve.

4. ATTACHMENTS
· None
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
11 Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.2. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0684
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Trang Nguyen, Finance Director

1. SUBJECT
Confirmation of accounts payable warrant registers dated December 5, 12, and 19, 2024 and payroll check warrants dated December 6, and 20, 2024.

2. SUMMARY
Per Government Code section 37208, the accounts payable warrant writings and payroll check warrants for the above listed dates are submitted for approval by the City Council.

3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Ratify the accompanying registers.

4. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
Government Code section 37208(a) provides that payroll warrants or checks need not be audited by the legislative body prior to payment. Payrolls shall be presented to the legislative body for ratification and approval at the first meeting of the month following delivery of the payroll warrants or checks.

The sum of payroll warrants and checks issued to employees and payroll vendors are noted on the attachments.

Government Code sections 37208(b) provide that accounts payable warrants or checks drawn in payment of demands certified or approved by the city clerk as conforming to a budget approved by ordinance or resolution of the legislative body need not be audited by the legislative body prior to payment. The checks issued in the attached warrant registers have been certified to be in accordance with the City’s approved budget.

5. ATTACHMENTS
· December 6, 2024 Payroll Warrant Information
· December 20, 2024 Payroll Warrant Information
· December 5, 2024 Warrant Writing Register
· December 12, 2024 Warrant Writing Register
· December 19, 2024 Warrant Writing Register
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
12 Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.2. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0684
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Trang Nguyen, Finance Director

1. SUBJECT
Confirmation of accounts payable warrant registers dated December 5, 12, and 19, 2024 and payroll check warrants dated December 6, and 20, 2024.

2. SUMMARY
Per Government Code section 37208, the accounts payable warrant writings and payroll check warrants for the above listed dates are submitted for approval by the City Council.

3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Ratify the accompanying registers.

The sum of payroll warrants and checks issued to employees and payroll vendors are noted on the attachments.

Date:

TOTAL AMOUNT (CHECKS & DIRECT DEPOSIT) :

Total Employees Paid:

Andrea Pham,
Assistant Finance Director
Comments:

Pamela Coleman,
City Clerk
Requestor Signature:

In accordance with Government Code Section 37202, I hereby certify and attest that the referenced demand conforms with the approved budget. I also certify and attest to the accuracy of the demands and the availability of funds for payment thereof.

Please review and approve before:

Comments:

Total Vendors Paid :

City of Orange
Finance Department - PAYROLL

PAYROLL WARRANT INFORMATION
PAY PERIOD:

PAYCHECK DATE:
14 Date:

Date:

TOTAL AMOUNT (CHECKS & DIRECT DEPOSIT) :

Total Employees Paid:

Andrea Pham,
Assistant Finance Director
Comments:

Pamela Coleman,
City Clerk
Requestor Signature:

Please review and approve before:

Comments:

Total Vendors Paid :

City of Orange
Finance Department - PAYROLL

PAYROLL WARRANT INFORMATION
PAY PERIOD:

PAYCHECK DATE:
15 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
1 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427161 12/5/2024 002513 DELTACARE USA Dec '24 2024 DEC DELTACARE, INV #BE006331359 100.20182 7,347.48
Total : 7,347.48
427162 12/5/2024 002304 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA) Dec '24 2024 DEC VSP, STATEMENT #821701896, 8217 100.20183 6,273.27
Total : 6,273.27
427163 12/5/2024 018974 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 189067401112124 ACCT# 189067401 PD INTERNET 11/21/24 - 1 100.4011.51011.00000 2,140.00117862
Total : 2,140.00
427164 12/5/2024 018974 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 187909301112124 ACCT# 187909301 PD CABLE 11/24/24 - 12/2 100.4011.51011.00000 422.46117862
Total : 422.46
427165 12/5/2024 007956 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP 483245332 12-13-24 LEASE VEHICLE 2024 HO DEC 2024 100.4033.51340.00000 599.79117865
Total : 599.79
427166 12/5/2024 007956 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP 462353800 12-22-24 LEASE VEHICLE 2022 HP DEC 2024 100.4021.51340.00000 599.00117865
Total : 599.00
427167 12/5/2024 007956 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP 487763993 12-24-24 LEASE VEHICLE 2024 HP DEC 2024 100.4033.51340.00000 585.79117865
Total : 585.79
427168 12/5/2024 007956 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP 462110593 12-8-24 LEASE VEHICLE 2022 HP DEC 2024 100.4033.51340.00000 570.89117865
Total : 570.89
427169 12/5/2024 000858 HARDY & HARPER INC RETRELBID23-24.28 RETAINAGE RELEASE-AGR 7682, BID NO. 23- 263.20050 82,495.24
274.20050 82,495.24
Total : 164,990.48
1Page:
16 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
2 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427170 12/5/2024 000052 OFFICE DEPOT INC 22973457 11.30.24 BI MONTHLY ACCT# 90646962 (BILL 100.4011.53011.00000 406.12
100.4041.53011.00000 160.21
100.5001.53011.00000 170.61
100.6001.53011.00000 127.24
220.5022.53011.00000 124.80
600.8011.53011.00000 137.10
100.1201.53011.00000 410.34
100.1401.53011.00000 107.08
100.2001.53011.00000 183.49
100.3011.53011.00000 129.05
Total : 1,956.04
427171 12/5/2024 000326 R J NOBLE COMPANY RETRELBID23-24.26 RETAINAGE RELEASE-AGR 7663, BID 23-24.26 310.20050 13,181.71
500.20050 1,782.18
Total : 14,963.89
427172 12/5/2024 000413 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 010272ZX260 12-2-24 LEASE VEHICLE 2023 TH DEC 2024 100.4033.51340.00000 499.80117871
Total : 499.80
427173 12/5/2024 000413 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 010272ZR550 12-6-24 LEASE VEHICLE 2022 TH DEC 2024 100.4021.51340.00000 499.27117871
Total : 499.27
427174 12/5/2024 000413 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 010272C4596 12-14-24 LEASE VEHICLE 2024 TS DEC 2024 100.4032.51340.00000 498.76117871
Total : 498.76
427175 12/5/2024 000413 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 010272B3581 12-4-24 LEASE VEHICLE 2024 TC DEC 2024 100.4033.51340.00000 498.74117871
Total : 498.74
427176 12/5/2024 000413 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 010272C5688 12-1-24 LEASE VEHICLE 2024 TT DEC 2024 100.4032.51340.00000 498.54117871
Total : 498.54
2Page:
17 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
3 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427177 12/5/2024 000413 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 010272ZP700 12-11-24 LEASE VEHICLE 2022 TS DEC 2024 100.4033.51340.00000 498.49117871
Total : 498.49
427178 12/5/2024 000413 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 010272ZV302 12-24-24 LEASE VEHICLE 2022 TT DEC 2024 100.4021.51340.00000 498.48117871
Total : 498.48
427179 12/5/2024 000413 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 010272A1808 12-23-24 LEASE VEHICLE 2023 TT DEC 2024 100.4033.51340.00000 491.77117871
Total : 491.77
427180 12/5/2024 018394 CHAUNCEY, STEPHEN 0203062025RADAR LASE RADAR LASER OPERATOR 100.4011.51850.00000 290.00
Total : 290.00
427181 12/5/2024 018487 FERRER, MATTHEW 10/07-18/2024RB SPECIAL WEAPONS AND TACTICS 100.4011.51850.00000 240.72
Total : 240.72
427182 12/5/2024 020081 GUTHMANN, KURT MILEAGEOCT24KG MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT OCTOBER24 KURT GUT 100.2001.51811.00000 16.88
Total : 16.88
427183 12/5/2024 001365 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFFS 250665SS LASD HART TRAFFIC COLLISION INTERMEDIATE: MATTHEW 100.4011.51850.00000 60.00
TRAFFIC COLLISION INTERMEDIATE: DAVID NG251056SS LASD NGUY 100.4011.51850.00000 60.00
Total : 120.00
427184 12/5/2024 002743 LUGO, CHRISTOPHER RB C LUGO REIMB: ABC BUY MONEY DR# 24-11-0695 100.4033.53060.30250 48.00
Total : 48.00
427185 12/5/2024 020688 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 0000603925 2024 - ACCT# 5190328 - OCT STMT - 000060 100.0401.51660.00000 3,146.79
Total : 3,146.79
3Page:
18 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
4 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427186 12/5/2024 015842 SHRYOCK, LOGAN 10/24-25/2024RB K9 NARCOTICS DETECTION RE CERT 100.4011.51840.00000 46.00
Total : 46.00
427187 12/5/2024 000397 SWRCB FEES SW-0301493 ANNUAL STORM WATER PERMIT RENEWAL (7/1/2 220.5024.51670.00000 45,494.00
Total : 45,494.00
427188 12/5/2024 019580 A21 TR#62457 REFUND OF RENTAL DEPOSIT-PERMIT# 14368 810.20319 750.00
Total : 750.00
427189 12/5/2024 004981 ACADEMY ELECTRIC INC 1375-39 AGR 7523 (22-23.39) - ELECTRICAL PREVENT 100.7022.51420.00000 800.00118069
AGR 7523 (22-23.39) - ELECTRICAL PREVENT1375-40
100.7022.51420.00000 2,300.00118069
Total : 3,100.00
427190 12/5/2024 016286 AIRDRAULICS INC 102928 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS FOR CITY VEHICL 710.5023.53750.00000 2,500.00118248
Total : 2,500.00
427191 12/5/2024 001244 AIRGAS USA LLC 9155424518 2024 NOVEMBER AIRGAS INV#9155424518 100.15101 3,588.00118288
100.15101 278.07
Total : 3,866.07
427192 12/5/2024 001017 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC 12718052 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE MAINTE 710.15102 164.75
AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE MAINTE12718070
710.15102 65.75
AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE MAINTE12719618
710.15102 182.52
Total : 413.02
427193 12/5/2024 019315 AMERICA TRUCK DRIVING SCHOOL GABRIEL MARTINEZ CLASS A/B TRUCK DRIVER: INDIVIDUAL~ 100.5021.51840.00000 4,495.00118295
4Page:
19 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
5 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 4,495.00 427193 12/5/2024 019315 019315 AMERICA TRUCK DRIVING SCHOOL 427194 12/5/2024 002579 AMERICAN SANITARY SUPPLY IN-AM036426 2024 NOVEMBER AMERSAN INV# IN-AM036426 100.3021.53620.00000 456.00118289
100.3021.53620.00000 35.34
100.3021.53620.00000 4.95118289
Total : 496.29
427195 12/5/2024 001147 ARCHIES TOWING 261465 VEHICLE EVIDENCE STORAGE FY 24-25 350.4041.51780.00000 112.50117878
Total : 112.50
427196 12/5/2024 005378 AUTO ZONE 05527787147 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 35.64117922
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE05942013674
710.15102 25.58117922
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE05942013865
710.15102 462.99117922
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE05942013920
710.15102 387.86117922
Total : 912.07
427197 12/5/2024 013658 BEE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TE 20200F BEE HIVE REMOVAL~ 291.5025.51431.00000 110.00
Total : 110.00
427198 12/5/2024 018258 BENDER READY MIX INC 186818 (BLA) CONCRETE MATERIAL - FY 24/25 263.5021.53840.00000 1,374.69117880
(BLA) CONCRETE MATERIAL - FY 24/25187256
263.5021.53840.00000 1,874.43117880
(BLA) CONCRETE MATERIAL - FY 24/25187303
263.5021.53840.00000 1,342.83117880
Total : 4,591.95
427199 12/5/2024 000053 BOOT BARN INV00425030 FY24-25: SAFETY BOOTS 730.0312.53940.00000 430.44
FY24-25: SAFETY BOOTSINV00425031
730.0312.53940.00000 500.00
5Page:
20 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
6 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427199 12/5/2024 (Continued)000053 BOOT BARN
FY24-25: SAFETY BOOTSINV00425032
730.0312.53940.00000 251.85
FY24-25: SAFETY BOOTSINV00425033
730.0312.53940.00000 261.01
FY24-25: SAFETY BOOTSINV00425034
730.0312.53940.00000 256.42
FY24-25: SAFETY BOOTSINV00425035
730.0312.53940.00000 169.43
FY24-25: SAFETY BOOTSINV00425036
730.0312.53940.00000 325.12
FY24-25: SAFETY BOOTSINV00425037
730.0312.53940.00000 106.74
FY24-25: SAFETY BOOTSINV00425038
730.0312.53940.00000 450.00
Total : 2,751.01
427200 12/5/2024 002313 BURRO CANYON SHOOTING PARK 3370 PD RANGE FEES: SNIPER TEAM 11/21/24 100.4011.51840.00000 50.00
Total : 50.00
427201 12/5/2024 016378 C3 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INV189527 10/27/24-11/26/24 - PRINTERS - ACCT CO36 780.1601.51420.00000 154.92
MANAGED PRINT SERVICES - PRINTERS - ACCTINV189781
780.1601.51420.00000 4,787.96
Total : 4,942.88
427202 12/5/2024 018693 CALIBER COLLISION 42042794 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR TO UNIT 1789 DUE TO AC 740.0312.52320.00000 4,329.09
Total : 4,329.09
427203 12/5/2024 000065 CALIFORNIA AUTO REFRIGERATION 320536 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 85.12117926
Total : 85.12
427204 12/5/2024 000075 CALIFORNIA POLICE CHIEFS ASSN 8753 EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: J MANCIN 360.4011.51830.00000 11,500.00118315
6Page:
21 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
7 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 11,500.00 427204 12/5/2024 000075 000075 CALIFORNIA POLICE CHIEFS ASSN 427205 12/5/2024 017952 CAL-STATE AUTO PARTS INC 330073 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 639.50117904
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE330533
710.15102 75.96117904
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE330780
710.15102 44.09117904
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE330831
710.15102 325.29117904
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE331173
710.15102 44.78117904
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE332174
710.15102 42.71117904
Total : 1,172.33
427206 12/5/2024 006583 CAM SERVICES 104110 AGR 7379 - STEAM CLEAN SERVICES FOR 100.5022.51700.00000 1,139.00118000
Total : 1,139.00
427207 12/5/2024 020779 CARILLO, POLO EP21615 EP21615 REFUND FOR DEPOSIT 811.20351 1,500.00
Total : 1,500.00
427208 12/5/2024 003595 CINTAS CORPORATION NO 2 4212204884 (BLA) UNIFORM MAINTENANCE - FY 24-25 100.7022.51722.00000 184.96117971
Total : 184.96
427209 12/5/2024 003595 CINTAS 5239567506 2024 NOV. REPLINISH FIRST AID KIT @ TAFT 730.0312.53940.00000 7.70
Total : 7.70
427210 12/5/2024 019162 CINTAS 4212213805 (BLA) LAUNDRY SERVICE FOR FLEET.~ FY 24/ 710.5023.51721.00000 145.30117905
Total : 145.30
427211 12/5/2024 010063 ANIMAL FRIENDS PET HOTEL 664670031 PD K9 VET SERVICES: K9 WYATT 100.4021.51650.00000 142.00117864
7Page:
22 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
8 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427211 12/5/2024 (Continued)010063 ANIMAL FRIENDS PET HOTEL K9 VET SERVICES: K9 WYATT666009005
100.4021.51650.00000 185.00117864
K9 VET SERVICES: K9 WYATT667256669
100.4021.51650.00000 2,105.25117864
Total : 2,432.25
427212 12/5/2024 001749 CORRPRO COMPANIES INC 769465 AGR 7709 - ENGINEERING SUPPORT FOR RES 5 600.8041.56440.18301 2,793.00118327
Total : 2,793.00
427213 12/5/2024 000974 DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA BE006359679A NOV 2024 DELTA DENTAL ADMIN FEES 752.1401.52340.00000 6,790.70
NOV 2024 DELTA DENTAL CLAIMS PAIDBE006359679C
752.1401.52340.00000 29,830.70
Total : 36,621.40
427214 12/5/2024 017762 DAVID WILSON'S VILLA FORD 057194 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 157.03118004
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE075084
710.15102 92.40118004
Total : 249.43
427215 12/5/2024 017077 FABRIC WALLCRAFT OF CA INC 54031 MAIN COMMUNITY ROOM METAL BLIND REPLACEM 100.2001.55131.19990 975.00
Total : 975.00
427216 12/5/2024 001639 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO 11-2017386 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 219.81117908
Total : 219.81
427217 12/5/2024 000002 FLEET SERVICES INC 01P151955 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 215.29117909
Total : 215.29
427218 12/5/2024 018059 FOCAL POINT OPTOMETRY ORANGE 266518144 FY24-25: SAFETY GLASSES 730.0312.53940.00000 150.00
8Page:
23 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
9 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 150.00 427218 12/5/2024 018059 018059 FOCAL POINT OPTOMETRY ORANGE 427219 12/5/2024 002198 GALLS LLC 029533963 PD UNIFORMS: T NELSON 100.4011.53030.00000 21.77117899
PD UNIFORMS: K HINES029659427
100.4011.53030.00000 103.33117899
PD UNIFORMS: T NELSON (CREDIT INV 029533029681811
100.4011.53030.00000 -21.77117899
PD UNIFORMS: J MADRID029691053
100.4011.53030.00000 21.77117899
PD UNIFORMS: T NELSON029714364
100.4011.53030.00000 11.95117899
PD UNIFORMS: L MEZA029714389
100.4011.53030.00000 186.54117899
PD UNIFORMS: J NIGRO029714410
100.4011.53030.00000 20.36117899
PD UNIFORMS: C GUTIERREZ029714475
100.4011.53030.00000 259.68117899
PD UNIFORMS: D WOLFF029726480
100.4011.53030.00000 29.75117899
Total : 633.38
427220 12/5/2024 002442 GRANITE MASTERS OC-1024 AGR 4722.G - VETERANS MEMORIAL STONEWORK 100.7022.51420.00000 750.00118144
AGR 4722.G - VETERANS MEMORIAL STONEWORKOC-1124
100.7022.51420.00000 1,850.00118144
Total : 2,600.00
427221 12/5/2024 020203 GRINDLINE SKATEPARKS INC 6431 AGR 7586 - (23-24.02) DESIGN SERVICES FO 500.7021.56020.20519 18,103.06117540
551.7021.56020.20519 700.49117540
Total : 18,803.55
427222 12/5/2024 019436 HASA INC 1005771 AGR. 7061.2 (20-21.08) - HART PARK POOL 100.7022.53530.00000 704.84118202
Total : 704.84
9Page:
24 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
10 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427223 12/5/2024 018475 IMPERIAL BAG AND PAPER CO LLC 35621579 2024 OCTOBER IMPERIAL BAG AND PAPER INV# 100.15101 4,045.37118275
100.15101 313.52
2024 OCTOBER IMPERIAL BAG&PAPER INV# 35735787440
100.15101 5,581.14118285
100.15101 432.54
Total : 10,372.57
427224 12/5/2024 020380 IMPERIAL COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUC INV25-00112 MRC Q4 BILLING FOR LIBRARY INTERNET FY24 100.2004.51011.00000 1,087.62
Total : 1,087.62
427225 12/5/2024 012820 INLAND KENWORTH US INC 284530MNP AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE MAINTE 710.15102 156.84
Total : 156.84
427226 12/5/2024 017442 JOHN L HUNTER & ASSOCIATES INC ORA1SSM12409 2025 CONSULTING SERVICES FOR SSMP REVIEW 220.5024.51670.00000 3,206.50
Total : 3,206.50
427227 12/5/2024 001849 KUSTOM IMPRINTS 47185 HOUSING INSPECTION EMBROIDED SHIRTS CORR 921.6041.53060.00000 63.03
Total : 63.03
427228 12/5/2024 020248 LCR EARTHWORK & ENGINEERING RETRELBID23- 24.11 RETAINAGE RELEASE-AGR 7638, BID 23- 24. 263.20050 35,248.22
287.20050 10,000.00
500.20050 22,031.43
Total : 67,279.65
427229 12/5/2024 014828 LEXISNEXIS CLAIMS SOLUTIONS IN 1028003792 AGR 6383 - DESK OFFICER REPORTING SYSTEM 100.4021.53915.00000 15,750.00118331
Total : 15,750.00
427230 12/5/2024 000519 MAIN STREET MATERIALS 16003 (BLA) AGGREGATE BASE, SAND & COLD MIX - 600.8041.55451.00000 2,233.58117981
Total : 2,233.58
10Page:
25 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
11 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427231 12/5/2024 000250 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 36156324 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 76.56117939
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE36645218
710.15102 110.69117939
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE36817048
710.15102 20.01117939
Total : 207.26
427232 12/5/2024 002332 MC PEEK DODGE OF ANAHEIM 40972 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 749.08117940
Total : 749.08
427233 12/5/2024 013075 MIWALL CORP 1013443 PD WINCHESTER AMMUNITION FY 24-25 100.4011.53540.00000 3,504.21
Total : 3,504.21
427234 12/5/2024 020688 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 0000601513 2024 - ACCT# 5191119 - OCT STMT - 000060 510.7021.56015.20477 999.65
Total : 999.65
427235 12/5/2024 020772 MORA, LAURA 79721899 REFUND OF PERMIT FEE FOR CANCELLATION #1 810.20319 270.00
Total : 270.00
427236 12/5/2024 017385 NEWSBANK INC RTRN1150426 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER ELECTRONIC SUBSCR 100.2001.53301.19990 2,930.00
Total : 2,930.00
427237 12/5/2024 001987 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79534 AGR 6987.4 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FY 24/2 263.5021.51431.00000 1,003.95118103
AGR 7167 (20-21.25) LANDSCAPE MAINTENANC79568
291.5025.51431.00000 454.43118024
AGR 7167 (20-21.25) LANDSCAPE MAINTENANC79569
291.5025.51431.00000 96.65118024
AGR 6987.4 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FY 24/279572
100.5025.51431.00000 14.89118103
AGR 6987.4 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FY 24/279573
11Page:
26 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
12 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427237 12/5/2024 (Continued)001987 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 100.5025.51431.00000 227.10118103
AGR 7144 (20-21.37) - LANDSCAPE MAINTENA79574
294.5025.51431.00000 70.44118023
Total : 1,867.46
427238 12/5/2024 020216 NINYO & MOORE 293065 AGR 7558 - MATERIAL TESTING & SPECIALTY 600.8011.51620.00000 1,548.75117567
Total : 1,548.75
427239 12/5/2024 000096 ORANGE CNTY TREASURER-TAX COLL STTM002460 AGR 1461 PD MOBILE RADIO MAINTENANCE AUG 100.4011.51040.00000 6,902.74117983
Total : 6,902.74
427240 12/5/2024 012836 ORANGE COUNTY WINWATER WORKS 16775201 (BLA) REPAIR CLAMPS - WATER DIVISION~ FY 600.8041.55451.00000 958.65118050
Total : 958.65
427241 12/5/2024 000570 P J PRINTERS INC 225452 2024 NOVEMBER PJPRINTERS INV# 225452 100.4001.53011.00000 74.00
100.7001.53011.00000 74.00
100.4001.53011.00000 8.93
100.7011.53011.00000 8.93
100.4001.53011.00000 5.74
100.7011.53011.00000 5.73
2024 NOVEMBER PJ PRINTERS INV# 226041226041
100.4011.51761.00000 96.21
Total : 273.54
427242 12/5/2024 018645 PACIFIC EH & S SERVICES INC 24-1412D FY24-25: CAL OSHA SAFETY TRAINING 740.0312.51670.00000 1,110.00
Total : 1,110.00
427243 12/5/2024 019060 PARTS AUTHORITY LLC OCTOBER STMT 2024 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 5,382.11117868
Total : 5,382.11
427244 12/5/2024 019401 PENN CARE INC A123890 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 12Page:
27 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
13 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427244 12/5/2024 (Continued)019401 PENN CARE INC
710.15102 367.84118028
Total : 367.84
427245 12/5/2024 020694 SHINE PRO DETAIL SUPPLIES #D7 2024 OCTOBER SHINE PRO INV# D7 100.3021.53620.00000 517.60118252
100.3021.53620.00000 85.27
100.3021.53620.00000 582.64118252
Total : 1,185.51
427246 12/5/2024 001325 PEST OPTIONS INC 454780 (BLA) RODENT CONTROL - FY 24/25 100.7022.51420.00000 230.00117889
(BLA) RODENT CONTROL - FY 24/25455620
100.7022.51420.00000 290.00117889
Total : 520.00
427247 12/5/2024 015586 POINT EMBLEMS 17362 PD UNIFORM PATCHES FY 24-25 100.4011.53030.00000 473.85
Total : 473.85
427248 12/5/2024 000130 POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO E691682 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE BATTERIES FOR CITY VEHI 710.15102 949.43118030
Total : 949.43
427249 12/5/2024 001876 PRADO FAMILY SHOOTING RANGE 7238 FULL DAY TRAINING 11/20/24 100.4011.51780.00000 450.00117917
Total : 450.00
427250 12/5/2024 007130 PTI SAND & GRAVEL INC 0150102 (BLA) SAND & ASPHALT SUPPLIES - WATER DI 600.8041.55451.00000 2,730.94117985
Total : 2,730.94
427251 12/5/2024 016483 R & S OVERHEAD DOORS OF SO 9-26-1045938 MAIN CORP YARD - DOOR REPAIR 100.5028.51401.00000 445.00
Total : 445.00
427252 12/5/2024 019651 RC EMPIRE CORP INC 3250 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS FOR CITY VEHICL 710.5023.53750.00000 596.03118032
13Page:
28 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
14 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427252 12/5/2024 (Continued)019651 RC EMPIRE CORP INC
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS FOR CITY VEHICL3293
710.5023.53750.00000 70.00118032
Total : 666.03
427253 12/5/2024 000331 RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE AC 855-1-52056 FY24-25 NOV - SAFETY BOOTS 730.0312.53940.00000 500.00
Total : 500.00
427254 12/5/2024 000351 ROSEBURROUGH TOOL INC 794397 (BLA) SUPPLIES & MATERIALS FIELD SERVICE 263.5021.53840.00000 1,829.80118034
Total : 1,829.80
427255 12/5/2024 012784 S C SIGNS & SUPPLIES LLC 253510 (BLA) STREET SIGNS & MARKERS - FY 24/25 100.5073.53660.00000 1,131.38117869
Total : 1,131.38
427256 12/5/2024 000368 SCHORR METALS INC 1991806 STORM DRAIN METAL SUPPLIES & CUTTING 220.5022.53820.00000 1,467.99
Total : 1,467.99
427257 12/5/2024 000937 SEAGRAVE FIRE APPARATUS 000148346 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 623.70118037
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE000148459
710.15102 647.34118037
Total : 1,271.04
427258 12/5/2024 014719 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 147669884-001 (BLA) IRRIGATION SUPPLIES - FY 24/25 100.7022.53642.00000 126.02117890
CREDIT MEMO- (BLA) IRRIGATION SUPPLIES -147670449-001
100.7022.53642.00000 -94.52117890
Total : 31.50
427259 12/5/2024 000386 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO IN-0000625734 (BLA) UNLEADED FUEL FY 24/25 710.15202 29,725.63117951
(BLA) UNLEADED FUEL FY 24/25IN-0000625735
710.15202 28,015.88117951
14Page:
29 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
15 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 57,741.51 427259 12/5/2024 000386 000386 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO 427260 12/5/2024 000386 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO IN-0000014637 (BLA) DIESEL FUEL FY 24/25 710.15204 3,043.96117951
Total : 3,043.96
427261 12/5/2024 000396 STATE OF CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE 772779 PD LIVE SCAN CHARGES OCT 2024 100.4011.51670.00000 671.00117891
Total : 671.00
427262 12/5/2024 020105 SUPERIOR PAVEMENT MARKINGS 19689 AGR 7585 - (23-24.01) ANNUAL INSTALLATIO 100.5021.51700.00000 21,645.80118195
Total : 21,645.80
427263 12/5/2024 017111 TESCO CONTROLS INC 0083498-IN AGR 7771 - TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES TO 600.8011.56510.18912 14,700.00118346
600.8011.51401.00000 6,300.00118346
AGR 7771 - TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES TO0083995-IN
600.8011.56510.18912 6,357.19118346
600.8011.51401.00000 2,724.51118346
AGR 7771 - TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES TO0084199-IN
600.8011.56510.18912 8,820.00118346
600.8011.51401.00000 3,780.00118346
Total : 42,681.70
427264 12/5/2024 001919 TETRA TECH INC 52320779 AGR 6780 - WELL 28 DESIGN 600.8011.56411.18120 26,663.50111937
Total : 26,663.50
427265 12/5/2024 019458 TUNNELWORKS SERVICES INC 2086 AGR 7380 (21-22.33) S-246 - SEWER LINE C 220.5022.56510.15509 1,200.00118178
AGR 7380 (21-22.33) S-246 - SEWER LINE C2097
220.5022.56510.15509 22,704.24118178
AGR 7380 (21-22.33) S-246 - SEWER LINE C2098
220.5022.56510.15509 3,400.00118178
Total : 27,304.24
427266 12/5/2024 001563 ULINE 185546838 2024 NOVEMBER ULINE INV# 185546838 15Page:
30 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
16 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427266 12/5/2024 (Continued)001563 ULINE
100.15101 1,356.77118301
100.15101 103.08
LAB/PROPERTY SUPPLIES FY 24-25185625609
100.4034.53060.00000 619.77
Total : 2,079.62
427267 12/5/2024 005542 UNITED INDUSTRIES 235665 (BLA) MATERIALS & SUPPLIES - WATER DIVIS 600.8041.55451.00000 307.11118280
Total : 307.11
427268 12/5/2024 000944 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 00005733W1484 - 2025 11/25/24 UPS WEEKLY SHIPMENT 100.5001.51021.00000 35.90
710.5023.53670.00000 17.93
100.3011.51021.00000 14.85
710.5023.53670.00000 6.52
100.3011.51021.00000 1.56
Total : 76.76
427269 12/5/2024 014762 VERITEXT LLC 7885047 2024 OCT. INTERPRETING 740.0301.51600.00000 1,312.50
Total : 1,312.50
427270 12/5/2024 016163 VERITIV OPERATING COMP 069-50923975 2024 NOVEMBER VERITIV INV# 069-50923975 100.3021.53050.00000 617.76118292
220.5022.53050.00000 308.88118292
100.7022.53670.00000 308.88118292
100.3021.53050.00000 47.88
220.5022.53050.00000 23.94
100.7022.53670.00000 23.93
2024 NOVEMBER VERITIV INV# 069-50940140069-50940140
100.3021.53620.00000 580.00118325
100.15101 1,521.52118325
100.3021.53620.00000 44.95
100.15101 117.92
Total : 3,595.66
16Page:
31 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
17 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427271 12/5/2024 019036 VERITONE INC 886316 AGR 7316.A PD RACIAL & IDENTITY PROFILIN 100.4011.53915.00000 16,000.00118338
Total : 16,000.00
427272 12/5/2024 001559 VISTA PAINT - ORANGE 2024-716207-00 MISC MATERIALS 600.8041.53060.00000 339.25
Total : 339.25
427273 12/5/2024 009050 VULCAN MATERIALS CO 1900718 (BLA) ASPHALT MATERIAL - FY 24/25 263.5021.53840.00000 1,457.15117893
Total : 1,457.15
427274 12/5/2024 000431 W W GRAINGER INC 9323264797 (BLA) PARTS & SUPPLIES FOR MAINTENANCE O 600.8011.51510.00000 136.73118068
Total : 136.73
427275 12/5/2024 001267 WE DO GRAPHICS INC 210172 PASS THROUGH POSTCARD MAILING & POSTAGE 600.8011.51660.00000 1,234.53118306
Total : 1,234.53
427276 12/5/2024 000439 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 218811 AGR 7521 (22-23.38) DPW TREE TREE MAINTE 100.5025.51431.00000 1,296.00118111
AGR 7521 (22-23.38) DPW TREE TREE MAINTE220794
100.5025.51431.00000 2,475.00118111
AGR 7521 (22-23.38) DPW TREE TREE MAINTE220813-A
220.5025.51700.00000 64,347.00118111
Total : 68,118.00
427277 12/5/2024 016092 WINZER CORPORATION 2690967 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 329.57117958
Total : 329.57
12032024 12/3/2024 000384 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 12/03/24 UTILITIES 100.0000.51231.00000 150,195.71
220.5022.51231.00000 162.84
600.8011.51232.00000 39,869.45
291.5025.51231.00000 769.70
293.5025.51231.00000 16.12
17Page:
32 12/05/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
18 9:15:33AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 191,013.82 12032024 12/3/2024 000384 000384 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO Bank total : 976,013.53 118 Vouchers for bank code : wfap 976,013.53Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 118
18Page:
33 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
1 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 5489 12/12/2024 000261 MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF 11631 OCTOBER 2024 PURCHASE WATER 600.8011.53420.00000 329,782.76
Total : 329,782.76
5491 12/6/2024 001117 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Dec '24 2024 DEC PERS MEDICAL INV ID #1000000177 100.20180 744,664.81
760.0000.50611.00000 49,310.94
Total : 793,975.75
427278 12/12/2024 001990 EYEMED Dec '24 2024 DEC EYEMED INVOICE #166576563 100.20183 1,230.77
Total : 1,230.77
427279 12/12/2024 000906 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT INC RETRELBID22- 23.16 RETAINAGE RELEASE-AGR 7576, BID 22- 23. 274.20050 33,270.10
550.20050 20,141.52
Total : 53,411.62
427280 12/12/2024 017567 HORIZONS CONSTRUCTION CO INTL RERELAGR7647 RETAINAGE RELEASE-AGR 7647, CA-R8-GB01-1 500.20050 4,496.47
RETAINAGE RELEASE-AGR 7640, CA- R8- GB0RETRELAGR7640
100.20050 7,299.30
Total : 11,795.77
427281 12/12/2024 020523 MARINA LANDSCAPE INC RETRELBID23-24.34 RETAINAGE RELEASE-AGR7689, BID 23-24.34, 291.20050 18,895.92
Total : 18,895.92
427282 12/12/2024 020688 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 0000606313 2024 - ACCT# 5191119 - NOV STMT - 000606 100.7022.51420.00000 900.49
Total : 900.49
427283 12/12/2024 000381 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 7590564936 CHAPMAN/BATAVIA LEFT TURN SIGNAL MODIFIC 263.5074.56100.20329 695.40
Total : 695.40
427284 12/12/2024 000396 STATE OF CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE 774930 OCT 2024 DOJ FINGERPRINTS 1Page:
34 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
2 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427284 12/12/2024 (Continued)000396 STATE OF CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE 100.1401.51612.00000 322.00
Total : 322.00
427285 12/12/2024 017477 CHRISTY, ASHLEY 11/04-15/2024RB HOMICIDE INVESTIGATION 100.4011.51850.00000 230.00
Total : 230.00
427286 12/12/2024 020029 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRUCTION INC 13 AGR 7529 - (22-23.33) WELL 28 DRILLING - 600.8011.56411.18120 352,526.45117433
550.8011.56411.18120 218,389.55117433
13 Retainage (28,545.80)
Total : 542,370.20
427287 12/12/2024 002743 LUGO, CHRISTOPHER RB C LUGO 12-2-24 REIMB: ABC BUY MONEY EXPLORER MEAL 100.4033.53060.30250 15.00
Total : 15.00
427288 12/12/2024 011473 MERCADEL, TRACEE 10/30/2024RB CALIF ASSOC FOR PROPERTY & EVIDENCE TRAI 100.4011.51840.00000 58.83
Total : 58.83
427289 12/12/2024 011602 MILLER, PAUL NOVEMBER 2024 DATA USAGE 10/14/24 TO 11/13/24 100.7001.51011.00000 30.00
Total : 30.00
427290 12/12/2024 000300 ORANGE ELDERLY SERVICES INC DEC OPERATIONS 2024 AGR 7129 - MONTHLY OPERATION OF SENIOR C 100.7041.51670.00000 18,675.00118076
Total : 18,675.00
427291 12/12/2024 019234 PERRY, DONOVAN 11/21-22/2024RB ADVANCED ROADSIDE IMPAIRED DRIVER EFORCE 100.4011.51850.00000 111.39
Total : 111.39
427292 12/12/2024 020022 POPCORN FINANCE LLC 10090 10/16-11/15/24 (20 HRS)/ AGR 7744 - BUDG 100.1231.51670.00000 1,800.00118287
Total : 1,800.00
2Page:
35 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
3 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427293 12/12/2024 019181 TIANO, NICHOLAS 11/04-15/2024RB HOMICIDE INVESTIGATION 100.4011.51850.00000 230.00
Total : 230.00
427294 12/12/2024 020607 TRUJILLO, JANET 11/12/2024RB DISPATCH PRIMING 100.4011.51840.20131 36.00
Total : 36.00
427295 12/12/2024 001854 WIEGAND, JOHN RUNNING SHOES 24/25 RUNNING SHOES REIMB 2024/2024 100.3011.53030.00000 150.00
Total : 150.00
427296 12/12/2024 002107 ACE HARDWARE/CHAPMAN 267333 (BLA) PARTS & SUPPLIES - WATER DIVISION~ 600.8041.53060.00000 149.77117959
Total : 149.77
427297 12/12/2024 019738 ADVANCED SECURITY SYSTEMS INC 033838 MONITORING SERVICE #2179 100.5028.51401.00000 119.85
MONITORING SERVICE #2180033839
100.5028.51401.00000 119.85
MONITORING SERVICE #2182033841
100.5028.51401.00000 119.85
MONITORING SERVICE #2202033852
100.5028.51401.00000 119.85
MONITORING SERVICE #2330033876
100.5028.51401.00000 119.85
Total : 599.25
427298 12/12/2024 020798 ADVANTAGE MANAGEMENT O2400549 PARAMEDIC REFUND_PANCHERI, DEANN 100.20333 430.76
Total : 430.76
427299 12/12/2024 018555 AGA ENGINEERS INC 24348-IN AGR 7488 ON-CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SER 100.5031.51670.00000 1,200.00118238
Total : 1,200.00
427300 12/12/2024 000539 AIR SOURCE INDUSTRIES 00936806 STATION # 5 125.3015.53510.00000 132.25117877
3Page:
36 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
4 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427300 12/12/2024 (Continued)000539 AIR SOURCE INDUSTRIES STATION # 300937003
125.3015.53510.00000 404.50117877
STATION # 600937084
125.3015.53510.00000 295.60117877
STATION # 400937090
125.3015.53510.00000 386.35117877
Total : 1,218.70
427301 12/12/2024 001244 AIRGAS USA LLC 9155901099 2024 NOVEMBER AIRGAS INV# 9155901099 100.15101 2,925.00118307
100.15101 226.69
Total : 3,151.69
427302 12/12/2024 019874 ALEXANDERS CONTRACT SVCS INC 105426 AGR 7485 - METER READING SERVICES (WATER 600.8041.51670.00000 10,344.29116639
Total : 10,344.29
427303 12/12/2024 018627 AMOBIUS GROUP INC 4183 BUILDING SCHEDULING SOFTWARE 110.6001.55133.00000 300.00
Total : 300.00
427304 12/12/2024 002689 ANDY GUMP INC INV1192880 (BLA) PORT-A POTTY, WATER DIVISION~ FY 2 600.8011.53060.00000 186.37117999
Total : 186.37
427305 12/12/2024 019520 ANSWER CALIFORNIA 000034-681-561 (BLA) ANSWERING SERVICE - WATER DIVISION 600.8011.51670.00000 1,218.25117962
Total : 1,218.25
427306 12/12/2024 002217 AT&T 12/04/2024 11/04/2024-12/03/2024 CITYWIDE PHONE SVC 100.0401.51670.00000 32.08
100.3011.51011.00000 32.08
100.5028.51423.00000 32.08
100.5028.51450.20421 482.92
780.1601.51011.00000 2,044.33
Total : 2,623.49
4Page:
37 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
5 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427307 12/12/2024 006986 ATS COMMUNICATIONS 02683 ARG 5103 - ATS DIVIDEND OF CELL TOWER - 100.0000.52001.00000 12,468.06
Total : 12,468.06
427308 12/12/2024 005378 AUTO ZONE 05527771773 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 20.65117922
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE05527796918
710.15102 4.34117922
Total : 24.99
427309 12/12/2024 013658 BEE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TE 21331F (BLA) BEE REMOVAL CITY PKWY TREES. FY 24 220.5022.51700.00000 110.00117925
Total : 110.00
427310 12/12/2024 020690 BIO AQUATICS LAKE MANAGEMENT L 40544 AGR 7745 (23-24.27) MAINTENANCE SERVICES 100.7022.51420.00000 2,750.00118261
Total : 2,750.00
427311 12/12/2024 001312 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA O2304204 PARAMEDIC REFUND_GONZALEZ, LUPITA 100.20333 1,285.63
Total : 1,285.63
427312 12/12/2024 013590 BLUE RIBBON NURSERY 41556 (BLA) CONCRETE MATERIAL & SUPPLIES - FY2 263.5021.53840.00000 900.26118070
(BLA) CONCRETE MATERIAL & SUPPLIES - FY241680
263.5021.53840.00000 102.91118070
(BLA) CONCRETE MATERIAL & SUPPLIES - FY241751
263.5021.53840.00000 92.13118070
Total : 1,095.30
427313 12/12/2024 020796 BUTTICE, LAWRENCE O2402671 PARAMEDIC REFUND_BUTTICE, LAWRENCE 100.20333 80.00
Total : 80.00
427314 12/12/2024 000069 CALIFORNIA FORENSIC PHLEBOTOMY 2755 BLOOD DRAWS NOV 2024 100.4041.51670.00000 4,992.00117897
Total : 4,992.00
5Page:
38 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
6 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427315 12/12/2024 017952 CAL-STATE AUTO PARTS INC 325703 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 157.32117904
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE333000
710.15102 114.58117904
Total : 271.90
427316 12/12/2024 020651 CARDINAL PAINT AND POWDER INC I240093879 MAINT OF HYDRANTS - ORANGE GLOSS SPRAY P 600.8041.51550.00000 1,314.56118193
MAINT OF HYDRANTS - ORANGE GLOSS SPRAY PI240093880
600.8041.51550.00000 1,831.75118193
Total : 3,146.31
427317 12/12/2024 000082 CHAMP SHOE REPAIR 0452312 PERRY 100.3021.53040.00000 160.00117928
Total : 160.00
427318 12/12/2024 018974 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 188991501120124 188991501 100.3011.51011.00000 268.56117863
189065401189065401120124
100.3011.51011.00000 268.56117863
189065501189065501120124
100.3011.51011.00000 39.99117863
189065601189065601120124
100.3011.51011.00000 690.00117863
Total : 1,267.11
427319 12/12/2024 003595 CINTAS CORPORATION NO 2 4213083179 (BLA) UNIFORM MAINTENANCE - FY 24-25 100.7022.51722.00000 184.96117971
(BLA) UNIFORM MAINTENANCE - FY 24-254213432812
100.7022.51722.00000 40.04117971
Total : 225.00
427320 12/12/2024 019162 CINTAS 4213086800 (BLA) LAUNDRY SERVICE FOR FLEET.~ FY 24/ 710.5023.51721.00000 147.42117905
Total : 147.42
427321 12/12/2024 000029 CITY OF ANAHEIM HZM201907 FY 24/25 6Page:
39 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
7 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427321 12/12/2024 (Continued)000029 CITY OF ANAHEIM
100.3011.52170.00000 18,096.00118316
Total : 18,096.00
427322 12/12/2024 020799 CLINTON, LESLIE O2311436 PARAMEDIC REFUND_CLINTON, ALAN 100.20333 116.95
PARAMEDIC REFUND_CLINTON, ALANO2311802
100.20333 125.31
Total : 242.26
427323 12/12/2024 004588 CODE CONSULTING GROUP LLC 10-24-0172 OCTOBER 2024 100.3012.51780.00000 1,618.50118149
Total : 1,618.50
427324 12/12/2024 010063 ANIMAL FRIENDS PET HOTEL 665813560 BOARDING SERVICES K9 WYATT 100.4021.51650.00000 795.00117864
BOARDING SERVICES: K9 JAX667591598
100.4021.51650.00000 325.00117864
Total : 1,120.00
427325 12/12/2024 016446 CROSSROADS SOFTWARE INC 7833 PD TRAFFIC SOFTWARE, LICENSE & MAINTENAN 350.4041.53915.00000 2,400.00
Total : 2,400.00
427326 12/12/2024 000101 CULLIGAN 1968320 (BLA) PORTABLE TANK EXCHANGE - WATER FY 600.8011.53060.00000 109.57118003
Total : 109.57
427327 12/12/2024 012114 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 200523200 (BLA) TIRES FOR CITY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 710.15102 1,608.84117975
Total : 1,608.84
427328 12/12/2024 012227 DDS LEGAL SUPPORT SYSTEMS INC Ref000294793 REFUND DEPOSIT FOR CK # 8768 100.20005 275.00
Total : 275.00
427329 12/12/2024 020797 DE LA PAZ, CYNTHIA O2403797 PARAMEDIC REFUND_DELAPAZ, CYNTHIA 100.20333 322.62
7Page:
40 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
8 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 322.62 427329 12/12/2024 020797 020797 DE LA PAZ, CYNTHIA 427330 12/12/2024 004212 EAGLE PRINT DYNAMICS 29936-01 AQUATICS AND RECREATION UNIFORMS 100.7011.53030.00000 4,124.07118296
100.7011.53030.00000 319.61
Total : 4,443.68
427331 12/12/2024 002278 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1089 0038143 (BLA) MAINLINE SUPPLIES - WATER DIVISION 600.8041.55460.00000 8,751.77117977
Total : 8,751.77
427332 12/12/2024 014833 FORBES TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS INC FTS - 1109 (BLA) PROVIDE ON-CALL SERVICES FOR TECH 100.5074.51670.00000 1,050.00118128
Total : 1,050.00
427333 12/12/2024 012434 FORENSIC NURSE SPECIALISTS INC 6085 DR# 24-11-0236 100.4031.51640.00000 600.00117978
Total : 600.00
427334 12/12/2024 020793 GAILEY, JONNEL O2212318 PARAMEDIC REFUND_GAILEY, LONDON 100.20333 173.56
Total : 173.56
427335 12/12/2024 002198 GALLS LLC 029757202 PD UNIFORMS: B NIELSEN 100.4011.53030.00000 122.13117899
100.4011.53030.00000 35.12
PD UNIFORMS: B NIELSEN (CREDIT INV 02975029829292
100.4011.53030.00000 -35.12
Total : 122.13
427336 12/12/2024 020787 GORE, TIRATH R Ref000294799 REFUND REM OF DEPOSIT FOR CK # 752 100.20005 113.75
Total : 113.75
427337 12/12/2024 003056 GOVERNMENTJOBS.COM INC INV-126528 AGR 7763 - NEOGOV/INSIGHT SUBSCRIPTION F 100.1401.51670.00000 15,662.00118302
Total : 15,662.00
8Page:
41 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
9 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427338 12/12/2024 020203 GRINDLINE SKATEPARKS INC 6456 AGR 7586 - (23-24.02) DESIGN SERVICES FO 500.7021.56020.20519 6,671.83117540
551.7021.56020.20519 258.17117540
Total : 6,930.00
427339 12/12/2024 000175 HI-STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE, LLC 30109 AUTOMOTIVE OUTFITTING FOR UNIT 2204 720.5023.55212.19999 22,733.60118328
720.5023.55212.19999 1,393.73
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE30146
710.15102 1,476.18117932
Total : 25,603.51
427340 12/12/2024 006309 HUNTINGTON SECURITY SYSTEMS 0021145-IN ALARM SERVICE - FS3 100.5028.51423.00000 31.45
ALARM SERVICE - FIRE HQ0021146-IN
100.5028.51423.00000 31.45
Total : 62.90
427341 12/12/2024 018475 IMPERIAL BAG AND PAPER CO LLC 36092389 2024 NOVEMBER IMPERIAL DADE INV# 3609238 100.15101 2,108.00118329
100.15101 163.37
Total : 2,271.37
427342 12/12/2024 009564 INFOSEND INC 265430 2024 JUNE UB/AGR 5791.A - UB/BL PRINTING 600.1222.51761.00000 1,853.50118233
600.1222.51021.00000 6,494.53118233
600.1222.51761.00000 58.28
OCT 2024 UB/ AGR 5791.A - UB/BL PRINTING274363
600.1222.51761.00000 2,413.86118233
600.1222.51021.00000 9,087.03118233
600.1222.51761.00000 75.92
OCT 2024 BL/ AGR 5791.A - UB/BL PRINTING274365
100.1221.51761.00000 253.01118233
100.1221.51021.00000 1,572.10118233
100.1221.51761.00000 8.96
Total : 21,817.19
9Page:
42 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
10 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427343 12/12/2024 001828 IRV SEAVER MOTORCYCLES 20242569 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS FOR CITY VEHICL 710.5023.53750.00000 566.46118014
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS FOR CITY VEHICL20242575
710.5023.53750.00000 97.20118014
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS FOR CITY VEHICL20242639
710.5023.53750.00000 459.87118014
Total : 1,123.53
427344 12/12/2024 003842 ITERIS INC 174645 AGR 7258 (20-21.40) CONSULTANT SRVCS-TRA 287.5031.56100.20425 639.16114826
550.5031.56100.20425 5,522.30114826
550.5031.56510.20425 741.42114826
Total : 6,902.88
427345 12/12/2024 019556 ITS ONLY TEMPORARY INC 24-155 AGR 7425.B - HOLIDAY LIGHTING ELECTRICAL 100.7022.51700.00000 15,950.00118343
105.7015.51670.17552 3,432.50118343
Total : 19,382.50
427346 12/12/2024 020689 JMDIAZ INC 001 (24-265) AGR 7734 - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES 550.5032.56100.20518 7,516.26118330
500.5032.56100.20518 835.14118330
Total : 8,351.40
427347 12/12/2024 020475 JOE MAR POLYGRAPH 24-004-OPD PD POLYGRAPHS: C SANCHEZ 100.4011.51780.00000 250.00117901
Total : 250.00
427348 12/12/2024 001592 JTB SUPPLY CO 114355 (BLA) PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT FOR REPAIRS 100.5074.53630.00000 840.45118046
Total : 840.45
427349 12/12/2024 012657 KARISH INDUSTRIES INC 25021 (BLA) ELECTRICAL WIRING SUPPLIES - FY 24 500.5032.56100.20374 627.64118099
(BLA) ELECTRICAL WIRING SUPPLIES - FY 2425588
500.5032.56100.20374 2,876.93118099
Total : 3,504.57
10Page:
43 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
11 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427350 12/12/2024 000199 KENNEDY EQUIPMENT CO INC 57698 SUPPLIES 100.3021.51402.00000 275.12
FLUSH FACE FITTING FEMALE AND MALE57785
100.3021.51402.00000 178.15
Total : 453.27
427351 12/12/2024 016668 KILGORE FITNESS SERVICES 7460 SERVICE CALL WITH DRIVE TIME 560.3021.56032.30032 145.00
Total : 145.00
427352 12/12/2024 004815 KOA CORPORATION KAJC23069-21 ON CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING/PLAN CHECKIN 100.5001.51670.30211 1,210.00
Total : 1,210.00
427353 12/12/2024 002806 LATIN PLUMBING INC 30251 (BLA) PLUMBING REPAIRS - WATER DIVISION~ 600.8011.53060.00000 750.00118015
Total : 750.00
427354 12/12/2024 020785 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT HICKEY Ref000294794 REFUND REM OF DEPOSIT FOR CK # 5402 100.20005 173.00
Total : 173.00
427355 12/12/2024 020784 LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN R GRECCO Ref000294792 REFUND DEPOSIT FOR CK # 11299 100.20005 275.00
Total : 275.00
427356 12/12/2024 011802 LEOTEK ELECTRONICS USA LLC 4115150881 (BLA) LED SAFETY LIGHTS - FY 2024-2025 100.5074.53631.00000 29,577.37118100
Total : 29,577.37
427357 12/12/2024 020540 LESLIE, ISAIAH PC MTGS 3RD QTR '24 PC MEETINGS JUL - SEP 2024 100.6021.51670.19980 180.00
Total : 180.00
427358 12/12/2024 000221 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 278714 AGR 7739 - ARBITRATION-HR LEGAL MATTER - 100.0301.51611.00000 24,634.00118234
Total : 24,634.00
11Page:
44 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
12 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427359 12/12/2024 000222 LIFE-ASSIST INC 1529317 (BLA) EMS MEDICAL SUPPLIES FOR ORANGE - 125.3015.53510.00000 4,458.33117980
(BLA) EMS MEDICAL SUPPLIES FOR ORANGE -1531237
125.3015.53510.00000 3,917.86117980
Total : 8,376.19
427360 12/12/2024 011766 LINE GEAR FIRE & RESCUE EQUIP 51142 NAVIA 100.3011.53030.00000 177.79118160
SEMETROPOLIS51155
100.3011.53030.00000 614.18118160
Total : 791.97
427361 12/12/2024 015952 LYALL, JEFF Ref000294798 REFUND REM OF DEPOSIT FOR CC PMT 100.20005 126.00
Total : 126.00
427362 12/12/2024 000239 MAJOR LEAGUE SOFTBALL INC 1909-24 AGR 7572 - SOFTBALL FIELD MAINTENANCE SE 100.7022.51420.00000 3,620.00118181
105.7022.51424.00000 1,045.00118181
Total : 4,665.00
427363 12/12/2024 019835 MALDONADO, RUBY PC MTGS 3RD QTR '24 PC MEETINGS JUL - SEP 2024 100.6021.51670.19980 180.00
Total : 180.00
427364 12/12/2024 019822 MARTIN, ALISON PC MTGS 3RD QTR '24 PC MEETINGS JUL - SEP 2024 100.6021.51670.19980 120.00
Total : 120.00
427365 12/12/2024 016964 MARTINEZ, RICHARD T PC MTGS 3RD QTR '24 PC MEETINGS JUL - SEP 2024 100.6021.51670.19980 120.00
Total : 120.00
427366 12/12/2024 000250 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 36642611 (BLA) VARIOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT - FY 2 120.3021.53060.00000 327.48117887
(BLA) VARIOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT - FY 236642613
120.3021.53060.00000 166.52117887
12Page:
45 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
13 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 494.00 427366 12/12/2024 000250 000250 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 427367 12/12/2024 004606 MCCORMACK, TIM PC MTGS 3RD QTR '24 PC MEETINGS JUL - SEP 2024 100.6021.51670.19980 120.00
Total : 120.00
427368 12/12/2024 020065 MERIDIAN RAPID DEFENSE GROUP INV-R-5583 AGR 7519 - EQUIPMENT RENTAL/BARRICADES 100.5021.51670.00000 14,546.25118214
Total : 14,546.25
427369 12/12/2024 001867 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 11/30/24 STMT 134168 STATION # 4 100.3021.51721.00000 213.35117867
STATION # 711/30/24 STMT 134170
100.3021.51721.00000 193.80117867
STATION # 311/30/24 STMT 134315
100.3021.51721.00000 333.40117867
STATION # 511/30/24 STMT 134329
100.3021.51721.00000 322.85117867
STATION # 111/30/24 STMT 134334
100.3021.51721.00000 418.05117867
STATION # 211/30/24 STMT 134351
100.3021.51721.00000 236.12117867
STATION # 811/30/24 STMT 134988
100.3021.51721.00000 234.56117867
STATION # 611/30/24 STMT 217880
100.3021.51721.00000 422.20117867
PD TOWEL SERVICES FY 24-25522886645
100.4011.51670.00000 191.43117866
Total : 2,565.76
427370 12/12/2024 000261 MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF 3082 AGR 6243 - WATER CONSERVATION PARTICIPAT 600.8011.53441.00000 312.00118277
Total : 312.00
427371 12/12/2024 000909 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 7639931 (BLA) FENCING AND PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 100.7022.51350.00000 321.55118163
(BLA) FENCING AND PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL7641743
13Page:
46 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
14 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427371 12/12/2024 (Continued)000909 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 100.7022.51350.00000 593.88118163
Total : 915.43
427372 12/12/2024 012605 NATIONWIDE LEGAL LLC Ref000294795 REFUND REM OF DEPOSIT FOR CK # 5111618 100.20005 122.00
REFUND DEPOSIT FOR CK # 5111619Ref000294796
100.20005 275.00
Total : 397.00
427373 12/12/2024 020795 NAVARETTE, DAVID O2410362 PARAMEDIC REFUND_NAVARETTE, LINDA 100.20333 397.86
Total : 397.86
427374 12/12/2024 020740 OLSON REMCHO LLP 7516719 AGR 7756 - LEGAL SERVICES - FY 24/25 100.0301.51600.00000 6,090.00118334
Total : 6,090.00
427375 12/12/2024 004652 ONWARD ENGINEERING 7799 AGR 7681.1 - ON-CALL CONSTRUCTION SERVIC 220.5011.56200.15508 15,865.44118264
263.5011.56330.13120 3,574.56118264
Total : 19,440.00
427376 12/12/2024 000096 ORANGE CNTY TREASURER-TAX COLL SH70114 PRE-BOOKING & PRISONER PROPERTY INVENTOR 100.4011.51761.00000 135.20
AUG 2024STTM002470
100.3021.51040.00000 469.12117944
Total : 604.32
427377 12/12/2024 002367 ORTIZ, GUS 34680 PD COMMAND/MOTOR/SWAT WASHING NOV 2024 100.4011.51670.00000 180.00
Total : 180.00
427378 12/12/2024 000570 P J PRINTERS INC 226097;226114;226139 2024 NOVEMBER PJ PRINTERS INV 226097;226 100.15101 2,305.00118312
100.1221.51761.00000 1,009.00118312
600.1222.53011.00000 531.00118312
100.15101 453.00118312
14Page:
47 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
15 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427378 12/12/2024 (Continued)000570 P J PRINTERS INC
100.15101 213.75
100.1221.51761.00000 78.20
600.1222.53011.00000 41.15
Total : 4,631.10
427379 12/12/2024 001069 PARKHOUSE TIRE INC 1020288755 (BLA) TIRES FOR CITY VEHICLE FY 24/25 710.15102 545.62117916
Total : 545.62
427380 12/12/2024 001325 PEST OPTIONS INC 455523 (BLA) RODENT CONTROL - FY 24/25 100.7022.51420.00000 285.00117889
(BLA) RODENT CONTROL - FY 24/25455601
100.7022.51420.00000 225.00117889
Total : 510.00
427381 12/12/2024 001876 PRADO FAMILY SHOOTING RANGE 7245 FULL DAY TRAINING 11/26/24 100.4011.51780.00000 450.00117917
Total : 450.00
427382 12/12/2024 018185 PREMIER FIRST RESPONDER 1604 AGR 7559.A PD PSYCHOLOGICAL & PEER SUPPO 100.4011.51640.30224 300.00118124
Total : 300.00
427383 12/12/2024 020702 QUATROSENSE ENVIRONMENTAL LTD 56739 Q5C 250PPM TRX/SNSR 100.5028.51401.00000 2,102.50
Total : 2,102.50
427384 12/12/2024 000326 R J NOBLE COMPANY 251904 (BLA) BEE REMOVAL CITY PKWY TREES. FY 24 263.5021.53840.00000 2,640.75117946
Total : 2,640.75
427385 12/12/2024 000326 R J NOBLE COMPANY Ref000294802 REFUND DEPOSIT FOR CK # 2711 100.20005 1,500.00
Total : 1,500.00
427386 12/12/2024 020742 RAPID FIRE SAFETY & SECURITY 706378899 FIRE ALARM MONITORING 100.5028.51423.00000 50.00
15Page:
48 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
16 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 50.00 427386 12/12/2024 020742 020742 RAPID FIRE SAFETY & SECURITY 427387 12/12/2024 017584 LEXISNEXIS 3095484025 2024 NOV. - LEXIS NEXIS SUBSCRIPTION 100.0301.53301.00000 1,050.00
Total : 1,050.00
427388 12/12/2024 020794 RIVERA, SALVADOR O2408883 PARAMEDIC REFUND_RIVERA, ADELINE 100.20333 80.00
PARAMEDIC REFUND_RIVERA, ADELINEO2408961
100.20333 80.00
Total : 160.00
427389 12/12/2024 012750 S & J SUPPLY COMPANY INC S100234283.004 (BLA) MAINLINE SUPPLIES - WATER DIVISION 600.8041.55451.00000 2,930.80117989
Total : 2,930.80
427390 12/12/2024 012784 S C SIGNS & SUPPLIES LLC 253781 (BLA) STREET SIGNS & MARKERS - FY 24/25 100.5073.53660.00000 939.58117869
(BLA) STREET SIGNS & MARKERS - FY 24/25253850
100.5073.53660.00000 817.82117869
Total : 1,757.40
427391 12/12/2024 020800 SERVITE HIGHSCHOOL HEALTH PLAN 02311436 PARAMEDIC REFUND_CLINTON, ALAN 100.20333 1,345.71
PARAMEDIC REFUND_CLINTON, ALANO2311802
100.20333 807.77
Total : 2,153.48
427392 12/12/2024 020300 SIGNAL HILL AUTO ENTERPRISES 080311 2024 DECEMBER SUPPLY SOLUTIONS INV# 0803 100.15101 3,600.00118324
100.15101 279.00
Total : 3,879.00
427393 12/12/2024 000376 SMART & FINAL IRIS CO #388 601299 DECEMBER SMART&FINAL INV# 601299 220.5022.53050.00000 539.55118300
100.4011.51840.00000 539.55118300
100.7022.53670.00000 539.55118300
100.3021.53050.00000 539.55118300
16Page:
49 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
17 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427393 12/12/2024 (Continued)000376 SMART & FINAL IRIS CO #388 220.5022.53050.00000 40.50118300
100.4011.51840.00000 40.50118300
100.7022.53670.00000 40.50118300
100.3021.53050.00000 40.50118300
Total : 2,320.20
427394 12/12/2024 001118 SMITHSON ELECTRIC INC 64331 AGR 7628 - (23-24.16) ON-CALL TRAFFIC SI 100.5074.51700.00000 3,650.00118126
Total : 3,650.00
427395 12/12/2024 019426 SOCAL LIGHTING PROS INV-000598 AGR 7414.B - STORAGE, INSTALLATION & REM 100.7022.51700.00000 13,588.24118320
Total : 13,588.24
427396 12/12/2024 020755 SOLTANI, HAMED Ref000294791 PROJECT CANCELLED; REFUND CK # 646 100.20005 3,500.00
Total : 3,500.00
427397 12/12/2024 000877 INMARK IV00565951 2024 DECEMBER IMARK INV# IV00565951 100.3012.53060.00000 73.55
Total : 73.55
427398 12/12/2024 000520 STRYKER MEDICAL 9207186635 AUTOMOTIVE OUTFITTING TO UNIT 2300 720.5023.55212.19999 1,408.59118205
720.5023.55212.19999 104.97
AUTOMOTIVE OUTFITTING TO UNIT 23009207327838
720.5023.55212.19999 1,675.82118205
720.5023.55212.19999 124.88
201274379207669146
100.3023.51840.20234 9,146.24118337
100.3023.51840.20234 700.08
(BLA) MEDICAL SUPPLIES FOR LUCAS - FY 249207712352
100.3022.53510.00000 13.74117870
Total : 13,174.32
427399 12/12/2024 020788 SWP RENTALS INC Ref000294800 REFUND REM OF DEPOSIT FOR CK # 10074 17Page:
50 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
18 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427399 12/12/2024 (Continued)020788 SWP RENTALS INC
100.20005 171.50
Total : 171.50
427400 12/12/2024 020786 THE CASTAWAY MOTEL Ref000294797 REFUND REM OF DEPOSIT FOR CK # 4455 100.20005 13.00
Total : 13.00
427401 12/12/2024 012364 THE JUNGLE NURSERY INC 94 AGR 6044.K - WEED ABATEMENT SERVICES - 100.3012.51732.00000 7,563.79118166
Total : 7,563.79
427402 12/12/2024 017439 PAPE MATERIAL HANDLING INC 931995 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE MAINTE 710.15102 85.43
Total : 85.43
427403 12/12/2024 002294 T-MOBILE 5366528 DR# 22-01-0901 100.4031.51670.00000 350.00
DR# 22-01-09015366541
100.4031.51670.00000 140.00
Total : 490.00
427404 12/12/2024 002753 TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC 22635 ARG 7574 - GRANT WRITING AND LEGISLATIVE 100.0201.51670.00000 9,000.00118279
Total : 9,000.00
427405 12/12/2024 019915 TUCKER, SHANNON PC MTGS 3RD QTR '24 PC MEETINGS JUL - SEP 2024 100.6021.51670.19980 180.00
Total : 180.00
427406 12/12/2024 004589 TURNOUT MAINTENANCE CO 29094 (BLA) TURNOUT REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - F 100.3021.51402.00000 336.67118219
(BLA) TURNOUT REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - F29095
560.3021.56032.20124 1,200.00118219
Total : 1,536.67
427407 12/12/2024 002977 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 045-490292 AGR 7662 - ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING 600.1222.56510.20391 1,976.25117724
18Page:
51 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
19 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427407 12/12/2024 (Continued)002977 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 790.1601.56033.20391 6,023.75117724
AGR 7662 - ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING045-491597
600.1222.56510.20391 790.50117724
790.1601.56033.20391 2,409.50117724
AGR 7662 - ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING045-492576
600.1222.56510.20391 395.25117724
790.1601.56033.20391 1,204.75117724
Total : 12,800.00
427408 12/12/2024 000419 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 1120240505 (BLA) CALIFORNIA STATE FEE FOR REGULATOR 600.8041.51520.00000 577.95118064
Total : 577.95
427409 12/12/2024 000419 DIG SAFE BOARD 24-251788 (BLA) CALIFORNIA STATE FEE FOR REGULATOR 600.8041.51520.00000 196.78118064
Total : 196.78
427410 12/12/2024 020609 UNION OF SISTERS OF THE, PRESENTATION OF THE BVMO2407599 PARAMEDIC REFUND_HARNETT, WINIFRED 100.20333 2,322.56
Total : 2,322.56
427411 12/12/2024 000944 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 00005733W1494 - 2025 12/07/24 UPS WEEKLY SHIPMENT 100.5001.51021.00000 35.90
Total : 35.90
427412 12/12/2024 018602 UNITED PAVING CO Ref000294801 REFUND DEPOSIT FOR CK # 22454 100.20005 1,500.00
Total : 1,500.00
427413 12/12/2024 019230 UNITED RENTALS INC 241525907-001 (BLA) MATERIAL & EQUIPMENT RENTAL - FY24 263.5021.53840.00000 306.02117872
(BLA) EQUIPMENT RENTAL & SUPPLIES, WATER241678994-001
600.8041.51330.00000 325.61118065
(BLA) MATERIAL & EQUIPMENT RENTAL - FY24241891291-001
263.5021.53840.00000 306.02117872
Total : 937.65
19Page:
52 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
20 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427414 12/12/2024 016965 VAZQUEZ, DAVID PC MTGS 3RD QTR '24 PC MEETINGS JUL - SEP 2024 100.6021.51670.19980 180.00
Total : 180.00
427415 12/12/2024 001845 VERIZON WIRELESS 9978889797 (BLA) VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICE - FY 24/2 100.3011.51030.00000 8,887.89117875
10/29-11/28/24 ACCT# 270531403 - RISK MA9979830155
740.0312.51030.00000 101.54
Total : 8,989.43
427416 12/12/2024 001559 VISTA PAINT - ORANGE 2024-724151-00 PAINT SUPPLIES 600.8041.53060.00000 339.25
Total : 339.25
427417 12/12/2024 000431 W W GRAINGER INC 9321006190 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 100.29118040
Total : 100.29
427418 12/12/2024 002319 WATERLINE TECHNOLOGIES 5718302 (BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR 600.8011.53530.00000 542.20117955
(BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR5718303
600.8011.53530.00000 701.67117955
(BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR5718304
600.8011.53530.00000 433.76117955
(BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR5718307
600.8011.53530.00000 421.00117955
(BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR5718308
600.8011.53530.00000 433.76117955
(BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR5718309
600.8011.53530.00000 784.59117955
Total : 3,316.98
427419 12/12/2024 018943 WELLABLE LLC 31002 AGR 7427 HEALTH AND WELLNESS PLATFORM - 100.1401.51641.00000 520.00117956
Total : 520.00
427420 12/12/2024 000439 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 1-10677 AGR 7521 (22-23.38) PARKS TREE MAINTENAN 20Page:
53 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
21 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427420 12/12/2024 (Continued)000439 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 100.7022.51420.00000 2,100.00118112
AGR 7521 (22-23.38) DPW TREE TREE MAINTE221533
100.5025.51431.00000 576.00118111
AGR 7521 (22-23.38) DPW TREE TREE MAINTE221975
291.5025.51700.00000 288.00118111
AGR 7521 (22-23.38) PARKS TREE MAINTENAN222113
100.7022.51420.00000 1,440.00118112
Total : 4,404.00
427421 12/12/2024 000440 WEST COAST SAND & GRAVEL INC 787145 (BLA) SAND & ASPHALT SUPPLIES - WATER DI 600.8041.55451.00000 636.82117997
Total : 636.82
427422 12/12/2024 000448 WILLDAN ENGINEERING 00233292 AGR 7738 - ON CALL BUILDING AND SAFETY S 100.6031.51670.00000 5,775.00118293
Total : 5,775.00
427423 12/12/2024 002111 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 010-59923 CDIAC ANNUAL REPORT YEARLY FISCAL STATUS 940.9810.51631.00000 900.00
Total : 900.00
427424 12/12/2024 002801 YO FIRE SUPPLIES 1029639-01 (BLA) MAINLINE SUPPLIES - WATER DIVISION 600.8041.55451.00000 4,583.47118113
(BLA) MAINLINE SUPPLIES - WATER DIVISION1030167
600.8041.55451.00000 2,185.00118113
Total : 6,768.47
427425 12/12/2024 001379 Z A P MANUFACTURING INC 9199 (BLA) STREET SIGNS & MARKERS - FY 24/25 100.5073.53660.00000 656.85118044
Total : 656.85
12102024 12/10/2024 000385 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO 12/10/2024 UTILITIES 100.0000.51100.00000 564.76
Total : 564.76
Bank total : 2,227,282.63 151 Vouchers for bank code : wfap 21Page:
54 12/12/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
22 11:51:18AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 2,227,282.63Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 151 22Page:
55 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
1 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 5495 12/19/2024 003209 PERS REPLACEMENT BENEFIT FUND 100000017760213 AMT IN EXCESS OF IRC 415(B) FOR 760.0000.50510.00000 60,956.88
Total : 60,956.88
427426 12/19/2024 004255 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOC ND 2024/09-0201 2024 SEPTEMBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - CITY 100.0218.53060.00000 221.18
100.0201.51880.00000 305.27
100.0201.51860.00000 69.29
100.0101.51840.00000 700.00
100.0201.51830.00000 775.99
2024 SEPTEMBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - CITY2024/09-0301
100.0301.51870.00000 19.99
100.0301.51811.00000 28.00
740.0301.51600.00000 603.89
100.0301.51860.00000 75.00
100.0301.53301.00000 -100.00
2024 SEPTEMBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - CITY2024/09-0401
100.0401.53011.00000 128.32
100.0401.52551.00000 1,427.00
100.0401.51840.00000 550.00
2024 SEPTEMBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - FINA2024/09-1200
100.1231.51840.00000 1,100.00
100.1201.51870.00000 14.00
780.1601.51670.00000 241.89
100.1201.51840.00000 299.00
100.1201.53011.00000 37.56
730.0312.53940.00000 388.31
2024 SEPTEMBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - HUMA2024/09-1401
100.1401.51840.00000 1,267.82
100.0201.51670.20207 19.96
100.1401.51612.00000 29.95
100.1401.51860.00000 60.00
100.1401.51660.00000 644.95
100.1401.53011.00000 89.94
100.1401.53910.00000 -25.81
2024 SEPTEMBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - RISK2024/09-1410
1Page:
56 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
2 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427426 12/19/2024 (Continued)004255 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOC ND 730.0312.51840.00000 112.07
2024 SEPTEMBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - IT 12024/09-1601
780.1601.51860.00000 260.00
780.1601.53915.00000 91.94
2024 SEPTEMBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - LIBR2024/09-2000
100.2001.53011.00000 127.64
100.2001.53001.20307 131.91
100.2004.51423.00000 1,617.60
100.2001.53001.30249 224.69
100.2016.53340.30121 255.24
100.2001.53011.19990 310.73
100.2016.53340.19990 423.14
100.2001.53001.19986 519.29
2024 SEPTEMBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - FIRE2024/09-3000
100.3001.51840.00000 103.79
125.3016.53060.00000 1,155.20
100.3023.53020.00000 120.69
100.3011.51030.00000 131.90
100.3021.51401.00000 1,425.00
105.3024.53860.40380 1,449.09
100.3021.51402.00000 1,580.12
100.3012.53060.20250 163.76
100.3021.51840.00000 164.52
125.3016.51840.00000 166.39
105.3024.53860.40378 1,783.91
100.3012.53910.00000 183.16
120.3022.55131.00000 193.88
100.3021.53910.00000 196.07
100.3021.53945.00000 208.93
100.3011.53011.00000 220.30
105.3024.53860.40379 2,387.68
100.3011.51870.00000 26.00
100.3023.53060.00000 289.33
100.3021.53060.00000 32.31
100.3021.51040.00000 336.06
105.3024.53860.40376 381.63
2Page:
57 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
3 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427426 12/19/2024 (Continued)004255 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOC ND 100.3022.53510.00000 393.02
100.3011.51670.00000 409.98
100.3012.51840.00000 446.60
100.3023.51402.00000 5.55
100.3021.53930.00000 520.12
100.3021.53610.00000 53.85
100.3011.53060.00000 54.93
100.3021.53620.00000 57.08
100.3023.51830.00000 600.00
100.3021.53670.00000 663.55
100.3021.53630.00000 7.17
105.3024.53860.40381 1,897.76
125.3015.51670.00000 68.56
2024 SEPTEMBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - PUBL2024/09-5000
100.5073.53660.00000 675.58
220.5022.53011.00000 13.78
270.5021.53011.00000 13.98
100.5073.53610.00000 1,337.41
100.5001.53011.00000 135.54
100.5001.51870.00000 14.00
100.5021.53610.00000 151.51
100.0201.53060.00000 1,646.42
710.5023.53720.00000 1,709.63
100.5073.51840.00000 240.00
710.15102 26.89
263.5021.53840.00000 2,762.15
220.5022.51840.00000 2,790.00
220.5022.53910.00000 30.41
100.5031.53011.00000 391.35
100.5028.51401.00000 4,268.31
270.5021.53930.00000 47.39
100.5074.53670.00000 54.61
710.5023.53750.00000 60.00
220.5022.53670.00000 664.07
270.5021.53670.00000 805.24
100.5095.51700.30235 919.35
3Page:
58 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
4 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427426 12/19/2024 (Continued)004255 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOC ND 2024 SEPTEMBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - FLEE2024/09-5023
710.5023.53750.00000 1,003.98
740.0312.52320.00000 206.25
710.5023.51402.00000 229.48
100.0201.53060.00000 249.59
720.5023.55212.19999 285.00
710.15102 4,377.34
2024 SEPTEMBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - COMM2024/09-6000
100.6032.51860.00000 100.00
310.9640.55133.11110 150.00
317.9660.55133.11110 150.00
100.6032.51840.00000 1,595.00
100.6021.51840.00000 1,814.59
100.6034.51840.00000 225.00
100.6001.51840.00000 245.10
100.6011.51660.00000 250.96
100.6001.51870.00000 28.00
100.6032.53011.00000 29.07
100.6001.53011.00000 30.39
310.9640.51660.11110 332.26
100.6032.53030.00000 458.27
100.6021.53910.00000 48.54
110.6001.55133.00000 54.99
2024 SEPTEMBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - COMM2024/09-7000
100.7022.53672.00000 966.66
100.7014.53030.00000 105.55
100.7022.53641.00000 1,188.17
100.7022.53610.00000 1,273.17
100.7011.53380.00000 138.26
510.7021.56020.20437 1,446.35
100.7011.53350.00000 151.25
100.7022.53850.00000 157.56
100.7022.53630.00000 1,654.38
100.7014.51780.00000 18.00
100.7022.53710.00000 29.46
100.7014.53350.00000 350.75
4Page:
59 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
5 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427426 12/19/2024 (Continued)004255 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOC ND 100.7022.53671.00000 353.58
100.7011.53011.00000 41.16
100.7001.51840.00000 425.07
100.7011.51840.00000 48.00
100.7001.51670.00000 59.99
100.7015.53380.00000 59.99
100.7022.53840.00000 64.80
100.7022.53620.00000 866.25
100.7022.53670.00000 925.71
2024 SEPTEMBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - WATE2024/09-8000
600.8011.53011.00000 141.88
600.8041.53050.00000 180.69
600.8041.53810.00000 1,838.59
600.8041.53060.00000 4,662.84
600.8011.53910.00000 487.96
600.8011.58514.00000 668.33
600.8011.53060.00000 773.07
Total : 80,622.54
427427 12/19/2024 004255 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOC ND 2024/10-0201 2024 OCTOBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - CITY M 100.0201.51830.00000 153.89
100.0201.51880.00000 282.72
100.0201.51860.00000 41.30
100.0218.51840.00000 58.85
2024 OCTOBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - CITY A2024/10-0301
100.0301.51870.00000 19.99
100.0301.51811.00000 30.00
100.0301.51840.00000 5.00
740.0301.51600.00000 94.77
2024 OCTOBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - CITY C2024/10-0401
100.0401.51840.00000 443.93
100.0401.53011.00000 849.48
2024 OCTOBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - FINANC2024/10-1200
100.1201.51840.00000 129.19
780.1601.51670.00000 241.89
100.1201.51870.00000 28.00
5Page:
60 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
6 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427427 12/19/2024 (Continued)004255 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOC ND 730.0312.53940.00000 476.00
2024 OCTOBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - HUMAN2024/10-1401
100.1401.53011.00000 1,055.97
100.1401.51612.00000 25.95
100.1401.51660.00000 28.16
100.1401.51840.00000 819.59
2024 OCTOBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - RISK M2024/10-1410
730.0312.55132.00000 47.07
2024 OCTOBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - IT 1602024/10-1601
780.1601.53912.00000 106.72
780.1601.51011.00000 69.98
780.1601.53915.00000 91.94
2024 OCTOBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - LIBRAR2024/10-2000
100.2016.53340.19990 141.32
100.2001.53001.30249 299.80
100.0201.51670.20207 37.66
100.2017.53340.00000 49.52
100.2001.53011.00000 70.04
100.2001.53011.19990 94.35
2024 OCTOBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - FIRE 32024/10-3000
553.3021.56015.20535 10.66
105.3024.53860.40380 1,018.40
100.3021.53670.00000 107.95
100.3023.53020.00000 11.99
100.3023.51840.00000 117.86
100.3011.51030.00000 131.90
100.3011.51870.00000 145.00
100.3011.51761.00000 147.43
105.3024.53860.40377 1,536.25
105.3024.53860.30258 187.95
100.3022.51840.00000 20.00
100.3012.53910.00000 20.46
105.3024.53860.40382 2,013.74
100.3023.53060.00000 22.37
125.3022.51840.00000 250.00
100.3021.53910.00000 3,030.62
6Page:
61 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
7 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427427 12/19/2024 (Continued)004255 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOC ND 100.3021.53610.00000 32.39
105.3024.53860.40379 3,205.05
100.3023.53910.00000 338.31
100.3011.51670.00000 349.98
100.3012.53060.00000 354.52
100.3011.53011.00000 356.27
100.3021.51830.00000 40.00
125.3016.53060.00000 436.05
100.3021.53940.00000 436.32
100.3021.51402.00000 472.55
560.3021.56032.30032 5,118.06
100.3021.53050.00000 52.58
100.3023.51840.20234 5,500.00
100.3021.53620.00000 553.82
100.3021.53940.20490 6,750.54
100.3001.51830.00000 68.22
105.3024.53860.30256 70.99
100.3012.51840.00000 8.00
100.3011.51330.00000 814.64
125.3015.51670.00000 82.84
100.3021.51840.00000 84.99
100.3023.53330.00000 900.00
2024 OCTOBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - PUBLIC2024/10-5000
100.5025.51431.00000 11.79
270.5021.53670.00000 1,219.22
263.5021.53840.00000 1,250.94
100.5001.51870.00000 14.00
100.0201.51670.20207 146.04
100.5001.51670.00000 18.00
710.5023.53011.00000 213.11
270.5021.53930.00000 235.08
100.5012.51670.00000 24.00
100.5031.53011.00000 253.19
100.5073.53820.00000 266.29
100.5001.51860.00000 297.50
100.5031.51840.00000 300.00
7Page:
62 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
8 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427427 12/19/2024 (Continued)004255 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOC ND 100.5011.55131.00000 356.08
100.5001.53011.00000 41.97
100.5074.53670.00000 511.78
220.5022.53930.00000 532.71
100.5028.51401.00000 6,413.77
100.5021.53610.00000 853.38
100.5073.53610.00000 197.43
710.5023.53720.00000 2,108.39
220.5022.53670.00000 875.70
2024 OCTOBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - FLEET2024/10-5023
710.15102 1,670.64
710.5023.53750.00000 1,978.62
710.5023.51402.00000 502.79
740.0312.52320.00000 672.95
2024 OCTOBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - COMMUN2024/10-6000
100.6001.53011.00000 130.72
100.6001.51870.00000 14.00
100.6032.53011.00000 219.83
100.6032.53030.00000 24.26
100.6032.51840.00000 482.84
110.6001.55133.00000 59.99
100.6001.51840.00000 775.00
2024 OCTOBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - COMMUN2024/10-7000
100.7022.53610.00000 1,135.03
100.7014.51780.00000 18.00
105.7015.53380.30254 189.12
100.7022.53670.00000 196.26
100.7022.53672.00000 2,211.81
100.7022.53671.00000 241.50
100.7011.53380.00000 261.11
100.7022.53641.00000 299.60
100.7022.53202.00000 316.78
100.7022.53710.00000 38.40
100.7022.53840.00000 399.91
100.7001.51670.00000 41.19
100.7011.51660.00000 646.50
8Page:
63 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
9 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427427 12/19/2024 (Continued)004255 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOC ND 100.7022.53630.00000 713.45
100.7022.53620.00000 73.26
100.7011.53011.00000 89.99
510.7021.56020.20437 907.97
100.7001.53011.00000 313.94
2024 OCTOBER CAL CARD PURCHASES - WATER2024/10-8000
600.8041.53050.00000 136.26
600.8041.53060.00000 230.66
600.8011.53011.00000 299.53
600.8011.53060.00000 3,216.51
600.8011.51840.00000 480.00
600.8011.58514.00000 874.14
Total : 76,594.71
427428 12/19/2024 007956 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP 483245332 1-13-25 LEASE VEHICLE 2024 HO JAN 2025 100.4033.51340.00000 599.79117865
Total : 599.79
427429 12/19/2024 007956 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP 462353800 1-22-25 LEASE VEHICLE 2022 HP JAN 2025 100.4021.51340.00000 599.00117865
Total : 599.00
427430 12/19/2024 007956 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP 487763993 1-24-25 LEASE VEHICLE 2024 HP JAN 2025 100.4033.51340.00000 585.79117865
Total : 585.79
427431 12/19/2024 007956 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP 462110593 1-8-25 LEASE VEHICLE 2022 HP JAN 2025 100.4033.51340.00000 570.89117865
Total : 570.89
427432 12/19/2024 020768 LOSCH, JOSEPH 121324-KNEESHAW TRIAL EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT - KNEESHAW 740.0301.51600.00000 2,597.03
Total : 2,597.03
427433 12/19/2024 000052 OFFICE DEPOT INC 395842602001 2024 NOVEMBER ODP INV#395842602001 100.15101 3,500.00118310
9Page:
64 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
10 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427433 12/19/2024 (Continued)000052 OFFICE DEPOT INC
100.15101 271.25
Total : 3,771.25
427434 12/19/2024 000096 ORANGE CNTY TREASURER-TAX COLL SH70187 AGR 6447.4.2 FORENSIC SERVICES DEC 2024 100.4034.51780.00000 16,668.83118048
Total : 16,668.83
427435 12/19/2024 000096 ORANGE CNTY TREASURER-TAX COLL SH70090 OCATS NOV 2024 100.4011.51330.00000 1,104.51118174
Total : 1,104.51
427436 12/19/2024 000413 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 010272ZX260 1-2-25 LEASE VEHICLE 2023 TH JAN 2025 100.4033.51340.00000 499.80117871
Total : 499.80
427437 12/19/2024 000413 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 010272ZR550 1-6-25 LEASE VEHICLE 2022 TH JAN 2025 100.4021.51340.00000 499.27117871
Total : 499.27
427438 12/19/2024 000413 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 010272C4596 1-14-25 LEASE VEHICLE 2024 TS JAN 2025 100.4032.51340.00000 498.76117871
Total : 498.76
427439 12/19/2024 000413 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 010272B3581 1-4-25 LEASE VEHICLE 2024 TC JAN 2025 100.4033.51340.00000 498.74117871
Total : 498.74
427440 12/19/2024 000413 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 010272C5688 1-1-25 LEASE VEHICLE 2024 TT JAN 2025 100.4032.51340.00000 498.54117871
Total : 498.54
427441 12/19/2024 000413 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 010272ZP700 1-11-25 LEASE VEHICLE 2022 TS JAN 2025 100.4033.51340.00000 498.49117871
Total : 498.49
427442 12/19/2024 000413 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 010272ZV302 1-24-25 LEASE VEHICLE 2022 TT JAN 2025 100.4021.51340.00000 498.48117871
10Page:
65 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
11 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 498.48 427442 12/19/2024 000413 000413 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 427443 12/19/2024 000413 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 010272A1808 1-23-25 LEASE VEHICLE 2023 TT JAN 2025 100.4033.51340.00000 491.77117871
Total : 491.77
427444 12/19/2024 020778 BANG, ROCKY 10/07-18/2024RB CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION 100.4011.51850.00000 394.32
Total : 394.32
427445 12/19/2024 006003 BIRKELBACH, ERIK J FY25 REIMB. FY 25 CONTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE, REPAI 100.3021.53930.00000 318.70
Total : 318.70
427446 12/19/2024 015431 CASTANEDA, ANTHONY 11/22-26/2024RB CALIFORNIA NARCOTICS OFFICERS ASSOCIATIO 355.4033.51830.00000 347.00
Total : 347.00
427447 12/19/2024 019135 CEM CONSTRUCTION CORP 24-037 7th Invoice AGR 7653 - (23-24.25) (W-722) ANNUAL PIP 600.8041.56451.18400 54,300.00117687
24-037 7th Invoice Retainage (2,715.00)
Total : 51,585.00
427448 12/19/2024 004467 DONNELLY, SHAWN P REFUND DONNELLY REIMBURSEMENT INADVERTENTLY USED 600.8041.53060.00000 100.27
Total : 100.27
427449 12/19/2024 001600 ESPINOZA, MONICA 11/12-15/2024RB NOV 2024 CALPELRA TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMBUR 100.1401.51830.00000 808.96
Total : 808.96
427450 12/19/2024 012534 FREY, BRYAN RUNNING SHOES 24/25 RUNNING SHOES REIMB 2024/2025 100.3011.53030.00000 90.00
Total : 90.00
427451 12/19/2024 015551 GONZALEZ, NYKOLO 12/09-13/2024RB VEHICLE THEFT INVESTIGATION 100.4011.51850.00000 115.00
11Page:
66 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
12 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 115.00 427451 12/19/2024 015551 015551 GONZALEZ, NYKOLO 427452 12/19/2024 019180 HART, MATTHEW 08/19-23/2024RB TRAFFIC COLLISION INTERMEDIATE 100.4011.51850.00000 90.00
Total : 90.00
427453 12/19/2024 002824 HAYDON, SHAWN 10/01-03/2024RB CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF TACTICAL OFFIC 355.4021.51830.00000 108.00
Total : 108.00
427454 12/19/2024 008439 HAZ RENTAL CENTER, NEBAR INC DBA Q-006857 TABLES AND CHAIRS RENTAL FOR TREE LIGHTI 105.7015.53380.17552 3,518.75
Total : 3,518.75
427455 12/19/2024 016983 HERNANDEZ, DAVID 10/01-03/2024RB CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF TACTICAL OFFIC 355.4021.51830.00000 108.00
Total : 108.00
427456 12/19/2024 014129 IVANS, COLTEN 11/13-16/2024RB RILFE MARKSMANSHIP & SNIPER 100.4011.51850.00000 429.79
Total : 429.79
427457 12/19/2024 017467 JONES, CONNOR 11/22-26/2024RB CALIFORNIA NARCOTICS OFFICERS ASSOCIATIO 355.4033.51830.00000 347.00
Total : 347.00
427458 12/19/2024 002743 LUGO, CHRISTOPHER 11/22-26/2024RB CALIFORNIA NARCOTICS OFFICERS ASSOCIATIO 355.4033.51830.00000 347.00
Total : 347.00
427459 12/19/2024 005769 MADRID, GREGORY G 12/22-26/2024RB CALIFORNIA NARCOTICS OFFICERS ASSOCIATIO 355.4033.51830.00000 347.00
Total : 347.00
427460 12/19/2024 019456 MOORE, TYLER 10/01-03/2024RB CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF TACTICAL OFFIC 355.4021.51830.00000 108.00
FIELD TRAINING OFFICER11/04-08/2024RB
100.4011.51850.00000 120.36
12Page:
67 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
13 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 228.36 427460 12/19/2024 019456 019456 MOORE, TYLER 427461 12/19/2024 019886 NAJERA, ALEX 10/01-03/2024RB CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF TACTICAL OFFIC 355.4021.51830.00000 108.00
Total : 108.00
427462 12/19/2024 016338 NGUYEN, DAVID 08/19-23/2024RB TRAFFIC COLLISION INTERMEDIATE 100.4011.51850.00000 90.00
Total : 90.00
427463 12/19/2024 018035 PATEL, YASH 11/12/2024RB DRUG RECOGNITION EXPERT RE CERT 100.4011.51850.00000 23.00
Total : 23.00
427464 12/19/2024 020022 POPCORN FINANCE LLC 10091 11/17-11/16/24: 27.7HRS /AGR7744 -BUDGET 100.1231.51670.00000 2,493.00118287
Total : 2,493.00
427465 12/19/2024 015714 PUGH, KEITH RENEWAL FEE 2024 FY25 CA EMSA PARAMEDIC LICENSE RENEWAL 125.3022.51840.00000 250.00
Total : 250.00
427466 12/19/2024 019246 REYES, JACOB 11/11-15/2024RB RADAR LIDAR 100.4011.51850.00000 164.58
Total : 164.58
427467 12/19/2024 020810 RUSSELL AND LAZARUS APC 022323-HENNING SETTLEMENT - PERSONAL INJURY 740.0312.52310.00000 25,000.00
Total : 25,000.00
427468 12/19/2024 016985 SAMARIAN, DANIEL 11/04-08/2024RB FIELD TRAINING OFFICER 100.4011.51850.00000 120.36
Total : 120.36
427469 12/19/2024 015842 SHRYOCK, LOGAN 10/01-03/2024RB CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF TACTICAL OFFIC 355.4021.51830.00000 108.00
Total : 108.00
13Page:
68 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
14 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427470 12/19/2024 001441 SPRIGGS, JIM 10/21-24/2024RB FY25 PER DIEM FOR FIRE INVESTIGATOR CONF 100.3012.51830.00000 266.00
Total : 266.00
427471 12/19/2024 000397 SWRCB FEES WD-0284006 ANNUAL PERMIT FEE 7/1/24-6/30/25 220.5024.51670.00000 21,150.00
Total : 21,150.00
427472 12/19/2024 018234 THE HUB OC 450 AGR 7711 HUB RESOURCE CENTER SUPPORTIVE 312.9660.51670.30206 33,258.27118133
AGR 7711 HUB RESOURCE CENTER SUPPORTIVE67
312.9660.51670.30206 19,910.46118133
Total : 53,168.73
427473 12/19/2024 020278 WOLFE, DANNIELLE 11/04-08/2024RB FIELD TRAINING OFFICER 100.4011.51850.00000 120.36
Total : 120.36
427474 12/19/2024 002275 WYNN, STEVEN 12/10-12/2024RB TRAFFIC COLLISION VEHICLE INSPECTION 100.4011.51850.00000 69.00
Total : 69.00
427475 12/19/2024 018722 4ALLPROMOS LLC 1608746 PD CRIME PREVENTION SWAG: STRESS RELIEVE 100.4011.53060.00000 1,649.51118321
100.4011.53060.00000 123.23
Total : 1,772.74
427476 12/19/2024 011584 ACE 5ON5 LLC 0000225 AGR 4136.G/4136.G.1 - ADULT BASKETBALL 100.7014.51780.00000 1,647.00118153
Total : 1,647.00
427477 12/19/2024 020202 ADI RP2LVM01 FY25 STATION ALERTING SUPPLIES 553.3021.56015.20535 52.24
Total : 52.24
427478 12/19/2024 005317 ADMINSURE INC 17530 AGR 0233 - WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS 730.0312.52232.00000 21,596.00117859
FY24-25: WORK COMPENSATION MEDICAL BILL17531
14Page:
69 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
15 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427478 12/19/2024 (Continued)005317 ADMINSURE INC
730.0312.52210.00000 1,132.00
Total : 22,728.00
427479 12/19/2024 017443 AFR ENGINE 10555 FACIAL RECOGNITION LICENSE RENEWAL 12/28 100.4031.53915.00000 4,995.00
Total : 4,995.00
427480 12/19/2024 000539 AIR SOURCE INDUSTRIES 00936221 FY25 OXYGEN SERVICES, STATION # 1 125.3015.53510.00000 368.20117877
FY25 OXYGEN SERVICES, STATION # 300937458
125.3015.53510.00000 136.94117877
125.3022.53510.00000 2.06117877
Total : 507.20
427481 12/19/2024 002797 ALCO TARGET COMPANY 72655 SWAT TRAINING TARGETS 100.4011.53540.00000 75.43
Total : 75.43
427482 12/19/2024 020629 ALERT 360 44014165 ALARM & FIRE MONITORING FOR CITYWIDE 100.5028.51423.00000 89.79
ALARM & FIRE MONITORING FOR CITYWIDE45437696
100.5028.51423.00000 5.00
Total : 94.79
427483 12/19/2024 020698 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES I 97303 AGR 7750 - CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 11/10 100.4041.51670.00000 18,783.40118247
Total : 18,783.40
427484 12/19/2024 001029 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 260817 (BLA) FIREFIGHTER SAFETY GEAR AND EQUIPM 100.3021.53650.00000 70.66118134
Total : 70.66
427485 12/19/2024 020814 ALLURING HOMES, INC 2412-005 BUILDING PERMIT REFUND 300 N. RAMPART ST 100.6031.42210.00000 164.80
100.5001.46486.00000 118.40
Total : 283.20
15Page:
70 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
16 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427486 12/19/2024 020164 ALS GROUP USA INC 522405901 AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY 600.8011.51670.00000 44.00118093
AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY522405902
600.8011.51670.00000 44.00118093
AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY522405903
600.8011.51670.00000 44.00118093
AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY522405904
600.8011.51670.00000 31.00118093
AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY522405905
600.8011.51670.00000 62.00118093
AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY522405906
600.8011.51670.00000 234.00118093
AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY522405907
600.8011.51670.00000 6.50118093
AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY522405959
600.8011.51670.00000 13.00118093
AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY522405960
600.8011.51670.00000 44.00118093
AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY522405961
600.8011.51670.00000 6.50118093
AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY522405962
600.8011.51670.00000 6.50118093
AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY522405963
600.8011.51670.00000 6.50118093
AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY522405964
600.8011.51670.00000 6.50118093
AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY522406074
600.8011.51670.00000 6.50118093
AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY522406331
600.8011.51670.00000 992.00118093
AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY522406401
600.8011.51670.00000 80.00118093
AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY522406441
600.8011.51670.00000 227.50118093
AGR 7001.2 - WATER QUALITY TESTING - FY522406533
600.8011.51670.00000 227.50118093
16Page:
71 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
17 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 2,082.00 427486 12/19/2024 020164 020164 ALS GROUP USA INC 427487 12/19/2024 002742 ALTERNATIVE HOSE INC 6100768 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 39.78117920
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE6100874
710.15102 109.50117920
Total : 149.28
427488 12/19/2024 013767 AMERICAN RED CROSS - 22719712 FY25 OPIOID AWARENESS AND CPR STAFF TRAI 126.3015.53510.30227 611.80
Total : 611.80
427489 12/19/2024 000027 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN S0190984 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 01/01/2025-12/31/2025 600.8011.51860.00000 8,058.00
Total : 8,058.00
427490 12/19/2024 016381 AMERICOAT POWDER COATING 7498 (BLA) POWDER COATING LIDS/COVERS~ FY 24/ 600.8041.55451.00000 3,488.00117961
Total : 3,488.00
427491 12/19/2024 001147 ARCHIES TOWING 261665 (BLA) TOWING FOR CITY VEHICLES~ FY 24/25 710.5023.53750.00000 107.50117921
(BLA) TOWING FOR CITY VEHICLES~ FY 24/25261668
710.5023.53750.00000 107.50117921
(BLA) TOWING FOR CITY VEHICLES~ FY 24/25261708
710.5023.53750.00000 107.50117921
(BLA) TOWING FOR CITY VEHICLES~ FY 24/25261751
710.5023.53750.00000 107.50117921
(BLA) TOWING FOR CITY VEHICLES~ FY 24/25261757
710.5023.53750.00000 107.50117921
Total : 537.50
427492 12/19/2024 001079 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF ORANGE 27 AGR 7207.C - OPERATION SCHOOL BELL FY 2 310.9645.51770.11372 15,000.00118196
Total : 15,000.00
427493 12/19/2024 002388 AT & T MOBILITY 28730389358412172024 SCADA WELL NO.22 WIRELESS 600.8011.51423.00000 86.48
17Page:
72 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
18 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 86.48 427493 12/19/2024 002388 002388 AT & T MOBILITY 427494 12/19/2024 002217 AT&T 12/15/2024 11/15/2024-12/14/2024 CITYWIDE PHONE SVC 100.0301.51011.00000 32.44
100.1205.51011.00000 32.44
100.1231.51011.00000 64.88
100.2001.51011.00000 130.69
100.2016.51011.00000 160.65
100.3011.51011.00000 3,238.16
100.4011.51011.00000 2,254.12
100.4021.51011.00000 291.40
100.5028.51423.00000 63.58
100.7001.51011.00000 3,259.79
600.8011.51011.00000 159.09
710.5023.51011.00000 32.44
Total : 9,719.68
427495 12/19/2024 005378 AUTO ZONE 05527824125 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 6.08117922
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE05527826924
710.15102 16.30117922
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE05942037823
710.15102 181.01117922
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE05942040855
710.15102 89.42117922
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE05942041309
710.15102 348.02117922
Total : 640.83
427496 12/19/2024 002135 BC TRAFFIC SPECIALIST 062060 (BLA) STREET SIGNS & MARKERS.~ 100.5073.53660.00000 570.94118192
Total : 570.94
427497 12/19/2024 013658 BEE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TE 21633F (BLA) BEE REMOVAL - WATER DIVISION~ FY 2 600.8011.51670.00000 110.00117967
(BLA) BEE REMOVAL - WATER DIVISION~ FY 221858F
600.8011.51670.00000 110.00117967
18Page:
73 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
19 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 220.00 427497 12/19/2024 013658 013658 BEE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TE 427498 12/19/2024 020776 BERISH, BRIA 34638-09 UB-REFUND 600.11080 111.44
Total : 111.44
427499 12/19/2024 020535 ASAP 1593 ALARM SERVICE - MAIN LIBRARY 100.5028.51423.00000 1,416.85
Total : 1,416.85
427500 12/19/2024 020789 BOULDER ASSOCIATES 055140 REFUND REFUND REM OF DEPOSIT FOR CK # 1030476 100.20310 49.75
Total : 49.75
427501 12/19/2024 020330 BUEZO, ISRAEL Ref000295132 REFUND REM OF DEPOSIT FOR CK # 63 100.20005 264.00
Total : 264.00
427502 12/19/2024 002011 BURTONS FIRE INC S66269 (BLA) PARTS FOR FIRE APPARATUS FY 24/25 710.15102 228.57117881
Total : 228.57
427503 12/19/2024 001624 C WELLS PIPELINE MATERIALS SINV24-4319 (BLA) MAINLINE SUPPLIES - WATER DIVISION 600.8041.55451.00000 3,024.87117969
Total : 3,024.87
427504 12/19/2024 016378 C3 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INV190462 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - TROY MICR TONER FOR H 100.1231.53011.00000 975.96
11/15/24-12/14/24 - COPIERS - ACCT CO36INV190486
780.1601.51420.00000 275.96
Total : 1,251.92
427505 12/19/2024 019138 CALIFORNIA WATERS DEVELOPMENT 22668 MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR CITY FOUNTAINS 100.5028.51423.00000 606.00
Total : 606.00
427506 12/19/2024 017952 CAL-STATE AUTO PARTS INC 336082 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 148.40117904
19Page:
74 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
20 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427506 12/19/2024 (Continued)017952 CAL-STATE AUTO PARTS INC (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE336693
710.15102 67.88117904
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE338991
710.15102 234.63117904
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE340143
710.15102 34.48117904
Total : 485.39
427507 12/19/2024 006583 CAM SERVICES 106321 AGR 7379 - STEAM CLEAN SERVICES FOR 100.5022.51700.00000 400.00118000
AGR 7379 - STEAM CLEAN SERVICES FOR106322
100.5022.51700.00000 750.00118000
AGR 7379 - STEAM CLEAN SERVICES FOR106324
100.5022.51700.00000 185.00118000
Total : 1,335.00
427508 12/19/2024 006451 CHAMELEON BEVERAGE COMPANY C00111324 CITY OF ORANGE LOGO BOTTLED WATER 600.8011.51660.00000 706.90
Total : 706.90
427509 12/19/2024 002611 CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY 501012-2 AGR 5689.C - YEAR 1 OF 3 YEAR CONTRACT F 130.0000.51700.20067 45,000.00118340
Total : 45,000.00
427510 12/19/2024 009818 CHARGE POINT INC IN284778 REPAIRS TO EV CHARGESTATION AT LEMON STR 100.5028.51450.20421 172.63
Total : 172.63
427511 12/19/2024 019162 CINTAS 4213594885 (BLA) LAUNDRY SERVICE FOR FLEET.~ FY 24/ 710.5023.51721.00000 146.99117905
(BLA) LAUNDRY SERVICE FOR FLEET.~ FY 24/4214349737
710.5023.51721.00000 131.81117905
Total : 278.80
427512 12/19/2024 020350 CITYTHINKERS INC 2406-07 AGR 7645 - URBAN DESIGN SERVICES - FY 23 952.9810.51670.20541 3,630.00117688
20Page:
75 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
21 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 3,630.00 427512 12/19/2024 020350 020350 CITYTHINKERS INC 427513 12/19/2024 020178 COLANTUONO HIGHSMITH & WHATLEY 63122 AGR 7760 - ATTORNEY SERVICES - FY 24-25 100.0301.51600.00000 1,517.50118305
AGR 7760 - ATTORNEY SERVICES - FY 24-2563123
100.0301.51600.00000 425.00118305
Total : 1,942.50
427514 12/19/2024 010063 ANIMAL FRIENDS PET HOTEL 670542512 K9 VET SERVICES: K9 NASH 100.4021.51650.00000 142.00117864
K9 SERVICES: K9 WYATT671378742
100.4021.51650.00000 77.00117864
Total : 219.00
427515 12/19/2024 015395 CORNERSTONE COMMUNICATIONS 16435 PUBLIC RELATIONS SERVICES 100.0201.51670.00000 165.00
Total : 165.00
427516 12/19/2024 016793 CROWN CASTLE FIBER LLC 1709126 MONTHLY SERVICE COSTS FOR P2P DARK FIBER 780.1601.51011.00000 2,400.00118141
Total : 2,400.00
427517 12/19/2024 020315 CULLEN AND ASSOCIATES INC 012 11/4-11/27/24: 53HRS /AGR 7643.1 - CONSU 100.1201.51670.00000 6,360.00118232
Total : 6,360.00
427518 12/19/2024 000101 CULLIGAN 1967528 (BLA) MONTHLY WATER SERVICES FOR ADMIN B 100.0201.53011.00000 67.38118095
Total : 67.38
427519 12/19/2024 012114 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 200525015 (BLA) TIRES FOR CITY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 710.15102 831.43117975
Total : 831.43
427520 12/19/2024 020635 DAVID SHEEGOG ARCHITECT Ref000295134 REFUND REM OF DEPOSIT FOR VISA # 7613 100.20005 1,062.50
Total : 1,062.50
21Page:
76 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
22 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427521 12/19/2024 019991 DAVIS FARR LLP 2153 SEPT 2024/ AGR 7590.A - ACCOUNTING CONSU 100.1231.51670.00000 3,937.50118341
OCT 2024: 57 HRS/AGR 7590.A - ACCOUNTING2269
100.1231.51670.00000 5,985.00118341
NOV 2024: 44.5 HRS/AGR 7590.A - ACCOUNTI2361
100.1231.51670.00000 4,672.50118341
Total : 14,595.00
427522 12/19/2024 020802 DAWSON, TIM 47875-01 UB-REFUND 600.11080 63.07
Total : 63.07
427523 12/19/2024 012734 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 0005845769 RESTROOM RENTALS FOR TREE LIGHTING EVENT 105.7015.51670.17552 1,262.10
Total : 1,262.10
427524 12/19/2024 014203 DIVERSIFIED THERMAL SERVICES S50739 AGR 7659 - (23-24.22) MECHANICAL SERVICE 100.5028.51421.00000 209.67118096
100.5028.51700.00000 240.33118096
AGR 7659 - (23-24.22) MECHANICAL SERVICES51588
100.5028.51700.00000 450.00118096
Total : 900.00
427525 12/19/2024 019286 DOCUMENT & MICROFILM CONV 17373 AGR. 7354.2 DOCUMENT SCANNING COMMUNITY 110.6001.51670.00000 1,467.70117342
Total : 1,467.70
427526 12/19/2024 011271 DOERSCHEL, DARREN 162137 AGR 5921.G.1- TV/AV PRODUCTION SRVCS, TE 780.1601.51670.00000 2,500.00118158
Total : 2,500.00
427527 12/19/2024 020803 DOMINGUEZ, DANNY 1499-01 UB-REFUND 600.11080 111.02
Total : 111.02
427528 12/19/2024 001120 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC 69142 PD AMMUNITION FY 24-25 100.4011.53540.00000 20,639.51117898
22Page:
77 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
23 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 20,639.51 427528 12/19/2024 001120 001120 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC 427529 12/19/2024 001622 DUKE SERVICE COMPANY 397693 REPAIR OF COFFEE MACHINE COM DEV/DPW 100.6001.51402.00000 140.99
100.5001.51402.00000 140.99
Total : 281.98
427530 12/19/2024 017762 DAVID WILSON'S VILLA FORD 058284 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 63.98118004
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE075731
710.15102 96.67118004
Total : 160.65
427531 12/19/2024 020783 EAGAN US HOLDCO LLC 1088826 AGR 7583 - SOFTWARE SERVICES FY 24-25 100.0301.53301.00000 458.33
740.0301.51600.00000 2,291.67
AGR 7583 - SOFTWARE SERVICES FY 24-251089447
100.0301.53301.00000 481.25118350
740.0301.51600.00000 2,406.25118350
AGR 7583 - SOFTWARE SERVICES FY 24-25K-INV000029
100.0301.53301.00000 435.42118350
740.0301.51600.00000 2,177.08118350
AGR 7583 - SOFTWARE SERVICES FY 24-25K-INV000375
100.0301.53301.00000 1,260.42118350
740.0301.51600.00000 6,302.08118350
AGR 7583 - SOFTWARE SERVICES FY 24-25K-INV001142
100.0301.53301.00000 80.21
740.0301.51600.00000 401.04
AGR 7583 - SOFTWARE SERVICES FY 24-25K-INV001776
100.0301.53301.00000 389.58
740.0301.51600.00000 1,947.92
AGR 7583 - SOFTWARE SERVICES FY 24-25K-INV002243
100.0301.53301.00000 458.33
740.0301.51600.00000 2,291.67
AGR 7583 - SOFTWARE SERVICES FY 24-25K-INV002668
100.0301.53301.00000 183.33118350
740.0301.51600.00000 916.67118350
23Page:
78 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
24 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 22,481.25 427531 12/19/2024 020783 020783 EAGAN US HOLDCO LLC 427532 12/19/2024 019237 EDINGER URGENT CARE 00069377-00 2024 NOV - PHYSICALS 730.0312.52210.00000 55.00
AGR 7474 - EDINGER URGENT CARE.~00069378-00
100.1401.51640.00000 100.00118188
Total : 155.00
427533 12/19/2024 020653 EXCEL BACKFLOW SERVICE INC 936435 AGR 7724 - (23-24.40) BACKFLOW DEVICE TE 100.8041.51560.00000 2,282.00118213
AGR 7724 - (23-24.40) BACKFLOW DEVICE TE954606
100.8041.51560.00000 2,365.00118213
AGR 7724 - (23-24.40) BACKFLOW DEVICE TE954612
600.8041.51560.00000 990.00118213
AGR 7724 - (23-24.40) BACKFLOW DEVICE TE954616
291.8041.51560.00000 1,430.00118213
AGR 7724 - (23-24.40) BACKFLOW DEVICE TE954620
100.8041.51560.00000 2,805.00118213
AGR 7724 - (23-24.40) BACKFLOW DEVICE TE954623
100.8041.51560.00000 3,025.00118213
Total : 12,897.00
427534 12/19/2024 020534 EXPERT AUTO GLASS 20901 WINDOW REPLACEMENT 2025 PILOT 100.4033.53750.00000 501.31
Total : 501.31
427535 12/19/2024 001639 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO 11-2019907 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 5.93117908
Total : 5.93
427536 12/19/2024 020605 FAMILIES FORWARD 24 AGR 7708 - AFFORDABLE HOUSING SUPPORTIVE 310.9645.51770.30252 3,741.33118147
Total : 3,741.33
427537 12/19/2024 020770 FEGER, SPENCER DECEMBER 2024 AGR 7767 - INSTALLATION OF HOLIDAY DECOR 105.7015.51670.17552 10,832.00118342
100.7022.51700.00000 8,560.00118342
24Page:
79 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
25 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 19,392.00 427537 12/19/2024 020770 020770 FEGER, SPENCER 427538 12/19/2024 002278 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1089 0038977-1 (BLA) MAINLINE SUPPLIES - WATER DIVISION 600.8041.55460.00000 2,716.85117977
Total : 2,716.85
427539 12/19/2024 005168 FIRE EXTINGUISHING SAFETY & 5117 (BLA) FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE FOR FY 2 100.3021.51402.00000 552.01117883
Total : 552.01
427540 12/19/2024 020516 FIREFIGHTERS SAFETY CENTER 29776 FY25 UNIFORMS FOR SAC RECRUITS 100.3023.51840.20234 3,693.67
Total : 3,693.67
427541 12/19/2024 000002 FLEET SERVICES INC 01P152319 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 336.48117909
Total : 336.48
427542 12/19/2024 020806 FRENCH, DAVID 46270-05 UB-REFUND 600.11080 171.29
Total : 171.29
427543 12/19/2024 020813 FULLMER CONSTRUCTION 2308-232 BUILDING PERMIT REFUND E. SANTIAGO CANYO 830.20006 1,397.39
Total : 1,397.39
427544 12/19/2024 002198 GALLS LLC 029801456 PD UNIFORMS: M SELLERS 100.4011.53030.00000 99.13117899
PD UNIFORMS: J JUAREZ029801464
100.4011.53030.00000 36.70117899
PD UNIFORMS: L REED029801545
100.4011.53030.00000 9.30117899
PD UNIFORMS: LOCKERSTOCK (BADGE CASES)029801562
100.4011.53030.00000 312.37117899
PD UNIFORMS: S AGUIRRE029825578
100.4011.53030.00000 21.77117899
PD UNIFORMS: M SELLERS029825652
100.4011.53030.00000 364.26117899
25Page:
80 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
26 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427544 12/19/2024 (Continued)002198 GALLS LLC
PD UNIFORMS: J PRESCOTT029825655
100.4011.53030.00000 176.66117899
PD UNIFORMS: J MADRID029838644
100.4011.53030.00000 231.12117899
PD UNIFORMS: J THOMPSON029838654
100.4011.53030.00000 119.40117899
PD UNIFORMS: J JUAREZ029858918
100.4011.53030.00000 21.77117899
PD UNIFORMS: N HANSEN029883091
100.4011.53030.00000 106.71117899
PD UNIFORMS: M FERRER029907988
100.4011.53030.00000 77.88117899
PD UNIFORMS: L KEYS029908026
100.4011.53030.00000 21.77117899
PD UNIFORMS: A MARIN029908091
100.4011.53030.00000 22.50117899
PD UNIFORMS: M SELLERS029920411
100.4011.53030.00000 161.63117899
Total : 1,782.97
427545 12/19/2024 019872 GENERAL CODE LLC PG000038841 SUPPLEMENT 2 TO CITY OF ORANGE MUNICIPAL 100.0401.51670.00000 4,692.00
Total : 4,692.00
427546 12/19/2024 016078 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY INV1030227 FY24-25: SUBROGATION RECOVERY FEES 740.0312.48321.30140 481.23
FY24-25: SUBROGATION RECOVERY FEESINV1030444
740.0312.48321.30140 440.44
FY24-25: SUBROGATION RECOVERY FEESINV1030465
740.0312.48321.30140 998.43
Total : 1,920.10
427547 12/19/2024 009190 GLOBAL POWER GROUP INC 100156 (BLA) PM & REPAIRS CITY FACILITY FY 24/2 100.5028.51401.00000 945.00118079
Total : 945.00
26Page:
81 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
27 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427548 12/19/2024 002509 GLOBALSTAR USA 000000082588337 PD SATELLITE PHONES 12/16/24 100.4011.51030.00000 541.05
Total : 541.05
427549 12/19/2024 002445 GMS ELEVATOR SERVICES 122906 (BLA) PM & REPAIRS CITY ELEVATORS.~ FY 2 100.5028.51401.00000 815.00118080
Total : 815.00
427550 12/19/2024 016318 GRAFIX SYSTEMS 33224 FY25 DIGITAL PRINTING, UTV AND TRAILER 100.3021.53940.20490 3,407.00
FY25 DIGITAL PRINTING, UTV & TRAILER33225
100.3021.53940.20490 776.20
Total : 4,183.20
427551 12/19/2024 020696 GUY Z PRIHAR APC 24014 2024 DEC. - ARBITRATOR REVIEW HR MATTER 100.0301.51600.00000 3,900.00
Total : 3,900.00
427552 12/19/2024 004835 HF & H CONSULTANTS LLC 9721637 AGR 7697 - SB 1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRAN 100.5001.51670.30251 3,739.25117849
Total : 3,739.25
427553 12/19/2024 020811 H2O TO GO Ref000295129 REFUND REM OF DEPOSIT FOR MC # 5777 100.20005 1,490.25
Total : 1,490.25
427554 12/19/2024 012658 HANNA, BROPHY, MACLEAN, 2251995 FY24-25: IDR LEGAL MATTERS 730.0312.52212.00000 1,813.00
FY24-25: IDR LEGAL MATTERS2251999
730.0312.52212.00000 129.50
FY24-25: IDR LEGAL MATTERS2258802
730.0312.52212.00000 203.50
FY24-25: IDR LEGAL MATTERS2258805
730.0312.52212.00000 388.50
Total : 2,534.50
427555 12/19/2024 020804 HEIDLER, DOUG 47613-01 UB-REFUND 600.11080 157.86
27Page:
82 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
28 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 157.86 427555 12/19/2024 020804 020804 HEIDLER, DOUG 427556 12/19/2024 020801 HILL, PAUL EMERSON 12671-00 UB-REFUND 600.11080 49.87
Total : 49.87
427557 12/19/2024 020790 IMPERIAL STATIONS INC 053204 REFUND REFUND REM OF DEPOSIT FOR CK # 9755 100.20310 173.25
Total : 173.25
427558 12/19/2024 009564 INFOSEND INC 276225 2024 NOV UB/AGR 5791.A - UB/BL PRINTING 600.1222.51761.00000 1,928.79118233
600.1222.51021.00000 7,201.18118233
600.1222.51761.00000 60.92
AGR 5791.A - UB/BL PRINTING AND POSTAGE276227
100.1221.51761.00000 215.87118233
100.1221.51021.00000 1,354.52118233
100.1221.51761.00000 7.66
Total : 10,768.94
427559 12/19/2024 009564 INFOSEND INC 277230 CITY OF ORANGE WATER BILL INSERTS 2024 600.8011.51660.00000 210.00
Total : 210.00
427560 12/19/2024 000183 INTERNATIONAL ASSN OF CHIEFS 0385177 2025 IACP MEMBERSHIP #01777845 RENEWAL:
100.4011.51860.00000 220.00
Total : 220.00
427561 12/19/2024 000186 INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL SIGNAL 51199-25 2025 RENEWAL MEMBERSHIP DUES 100.5031.51860.00000 240.00
100.5073.51840.00000 480.00
Total : 720.00
427562 12/19/2024 017338 INTRATEK COMPUTER INC 20240422 AGR 7524 - IT HELP DESK & DESKTOP TECHNI 780.1601.51670.00000 28,701.13118159
Total : 28,701.13
427563 12/19/2024 001828 IRV SEAVER MOTORCYCLES 20242131 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS FOR CITY VEHICL 28Page:
83 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
29 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427563 12/19/2024 (Continued)001828 IRV SEAVER MOTORCYCLES 710.5023.53750.00000 1,031.67118014
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS FOR CITY VEHICL20242718
710.5023.53750.00000 756.83118014
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS FOR CITY VEHICL20242731
710.5023.53750.00000 2,086.70118014
Total : 3,875.20
427564 12/19/2024 003842 ITERIS INC 175465 AGR 7258 (20-21.40) CONSULTANT SRVCS-TRA 287.5031.56100.20425 653.46114826
550.5031.56100.20425 5,645.85114826
550.5031.56510.20425 758.01114826
AGR 7258 (20-21.40) CONSULTANT SRVCS-TRA176023
287.5031.56100.20425 804.07114826
550.5031.56100.20425 6,192.31114826
550.5031.56510.20425 744.01114826
Total : 14,797.71
427565 12/19/2024 000891 J J KELLER & ASSOCIATES INC 9109637030 FY24-25: NOV. ENCOMPASS MIN MO FEE 730.0312.51670.00000 99.00
Total : 99.00
427566 12/19/2024 002099 JADTEC SECURITY SERVICES 2492256 (BLA) ALARM SERVICE FOR CITY.~ FY 24/25 100.5028.51423.00000 116.85118083
Total : 116.85
427567 12/19/2024 020475 JOE MAR POLYGRAPH 24-005-OPD PD POLYGRAPHS: N REYNOSO 100.4011.51780.00000 250.00117901
PD POLYGRAPHS: G YOURGULEZ24-006-OPD
100.4011.51780.00000 250.00117901
Total : 500.00
427568 12/19/2024 017799 KEN GRODY FORD 570731 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS FOR CITY VEHICL 710.5023.53750.00000 2,960.22117934
Total : 2,960.22
427569 12/19/2024 000199 KENNEDY EQUIPMENT CO INC 57544 MARKING YELLOW CRAYON (NON-PO) 29Page:
84 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
30 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427569 12/19/2024 (Continued)000199 KENNEDY EQUIPMENT CO INC 270.5021.53670.00000 106.68
Total : 106.68
427570 12/19/2024 020792 KERR, CHRISTIN 2409-343 REFUND FOR INSPECTION FEE 4900 E. CHAPMA 100.6031.48210.00000 137.00
Total : 137.00
427571 12/19/2024 016844 KILTER TERMITE AND PEST CONTRL 603704 (BLA) PEST CONTROL SERVICES~ FY 24/25 100.5028.51423.00000 250.00118084
(BLA) PEST CONTROL SERVICES~ FY 24/25609370
100.5028.51423.00000 250.00118084
(BLA) PEST CONTROL SERVICES~ FY 24/25611244
100.5028.51423.00000 3.75118084
(BLA) PEST CONTROL SERVICES~ FY 24/25611604
100.5028.51423.00000 25.38118084
(BLA) PEST CONTROL SERVICES~ FY 24/25615310
100.5028.51423.00000 250.00118084
(BLA) PEST CONTROL SERVICES~ FY 24/25615318
100.5028.51423.00000 250.00118084
(BLA) PEST CONTROL SERVICES~ FY 24/25615696
100.5028.51423.00000 250.00118084
Total : 1,279.13
427572 12/19/2024 004439 KONICA MINOLTA 46127972 COPIER LEASE - 061-0173901-000 - LIBRARY 100.2001.51330.00000 614.04
Total : 614.04
427573 12/19/2024 020212 KOSMONT & ASSOCIATES INC 2403.4-006 AGR 7631.A - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISO 952.9810.51670.20541 2,200.00117698
Total : 2,200.00
427574 12/19/2024 010008 KRONOS INC 12330103 FY25 TELESTAFF SERVICE REQUEST, IVR ADDI 100.3011.51670.00000 193.50
Total : 193.50
427575 12/19/2024 001849 KUSTOM IMPRINTS 46604 HOUSING INSPECTION EMBROIDED SHIRTS FOR 30Page:
85 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
31 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427575 12/19/2024 (Continued)001849 KUSTOM IMPRINTS
921.6041.53060.00000 361.99
Total : 361.99
427576 12/19/2024 000209 L N CURTIS & SONS INV886809 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT & RESCUE TOOLS, S 500.3021.56032.20501 123,864.97117711
500.3021.56032.20501 9,655.19
500.3021.56032.20501 718.20117711
Total : 134,238.36
427577 12/19/2024 004974 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD LLP 66147 AGR 7155.1 - ANNUAL AUDIT SERVICES FOR F 100.1231.51630.00000 5,054.71118187
940.9810.51630.00000 1,802.54118187
310.9640.51630.11110 1,081.52118187
317.9660.51630.00000 721.02118187
220.5022.51630.00000 2,884.06118187
600.1222.51630.00000 6,489.15118187
245.1401.51630.00000 1,137.00118187
100.1201.51630.00000 2,292.00118187
921.9810.51630.00000 1,681.00118187
Total : 23,143.00
427578 12/19/2024 000222 LIFE-ASSIST INC 1529743 (BLA) EMS MEDICAL SUPPLIES FOR ORANGE - 125.3015.53510.00000 386.40117980
(BLA) EMS MEDICAL SUPPLIES FOR ORANGE -1532597
125.3015.53510.00000 3,452.00117980
(BLA) EMS MEDICAL SUPPLIES FOR ORANGE -1534709
125.3015.53510.00000 5,517.62117980
Total : 9,356.02
427579 12/19/2024 000223 LIFECOM INC 2104886-IN (BLA) CALIBRATION PUMP/BATTERY EQUIPMENT 600.8011.51402.00000 65.00118016
(BLA) CALIBRATION PUMP/BATTERY EQUIPMENT2105042-IN
600.8011.51402.00000 65.00118016
(BLA) CALIBRATION PUMP/BATTERY EQUIPMENT2105110-IN
600.8011.51402.00000 65.00118016
FY25 REPAIRS TO MACHINES AND EQUIPMENT,2105160-IN
31Page:
86 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
32 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427579 12/19/2024 (Continued)000223 LIFECOM INC
100.3021.51402.00000 348.57
Total : 543.57
427580 12/19/2024 011766 LINE GEAR FIRE & RESCUE EQUIP 51349 FY25 AO UNIFORMS 125.3016.53030.00000 3,375.81118160
Total : 3,375.81
427581 12/19/2024 015662 LOOPNET 121080358-1 MOBNTHLY SUBSCRIPTION TO LOOPNET 100.0218.51780.00000 550.00
Total : 550.00
427582 12/19/2024 015662 COSTAR 121547723 MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTION TO LOOPNET/COSTAR 100.0218.51780.00000 511.16
Total : 511.16
427583 12/19/2024 000604 LOS ANGELES TRUCK CENTERS LLC XA211266829.01 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE MAINTE 710.15102 1,472.39
Total : 1,472.39
427584 12/19/2024 015952 LYALL, JEFF 052513 REFUND REFUND REM OF DEPOSIT FOR CK # 8533 & 14 100.20310 842.00
Total : 842.00
427585 12/19/2024 000519 MAIN STREET MATERIALS 16006 (BLA) AGGREGATE BASE, SAND & COLD MIX - 600.8041.55451.00000 2,111.12117981
Total : 2,111.12
427586 12/19/2024 018633 MAINTEX INC 1113323-00 2024 DECEMBER MAINTEX INV# 1113323-00 100.15101 834.12118351
100.15101 64.64
Total : 898.76
427587 12/19/2024 020809 MARUSIN, ROBERT J 6220-00 UB-REFUND 600.11080 232.05
Total : 232.05
427588 12/19/2024 019342 MARVCO ENTERPRISES INC 136695 DISPATCH HEADSETS 32Page:
87 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
33 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427588 12/19/2024 (Continued)019342 MARVCO ENTERPRISES INC 100.4012.53060.00000 817.70
Total : 817.70
427589 12/19/2024 000250 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 37402364 (BLA) VARIOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT - FY 2 120.3021.53060.00000 155.20117887
Total : 155.20
427590 12/19/2024 002332 MC PEEK DODGE OF ANAHEIM 41568 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 134.47117940
Total : 134.47
427591 12/19/2024 020159 MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA 107 Ref000295130 REFUND REM OF DEPOSIT FOR VISA # 0005 100.20005 1,049.00
Total : 1,049.00
427592 12/19/2024 020774 MICHAELS, SCOTT 11984-01 UB-REFUND 600.11080 112.46
Total : 112.46
427593 12/19/2024 001867 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 522921875 PD TOWEL SERVICES FY 24-25 100.4011.51670.00000 191.43117866
Total : 191.43
427594 12/19/2024 000793 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC US INC 509707 (BLA) PARKING STRUCTURE ELEVATOR MAINTEN 100.5028.51450.20421 629.24118101
Total : 629.24
427595 12/19/2024 016819 MOBILE WIRELESS LLC 6032 PD NET MOTION MAINTENANCE 1 YR 2025 100.4011.53915.00000 11,700.00118332
Total : 11,700.00
427596 12/19/2024 002712 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC 1411147450 PD SOFTWARE COMMERCIAL DATA SUBSCRIPTION 354.4011.55131.00000 21,040.00118333
Total : 21,040.00
427597 12/19/2024 002619 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIP 029964 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS FOR CITY VEHICLE MAIN 710.5023.53750.00000 1,264.29
33Page:
88 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
34 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 1,264.29 427597 12/19/2024 002619 002619 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIP 427598 12/19/2024 020775 NERO, KEN 14844-01 UB-REFUND
600.11080 501.50
Total : 501.50
427599 12/19/2024 020791 NEW CASTLE CONSTRUCTION, GARY E JACKSON2410-380 BUILDING PERMIT REFUND 3628 E. SUMMITRID 100.5001.46955.00000 789.00
Total : 789.00
427600 12/19/2024 001987 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79570 IRRIGATION REPAIRS HUB OC 100.0000.52001.30200 292.63
AGR 7167 (20-21.25) LANDSCAPE MAINTENANC79682
291.5025.51431.00000 26,482.00118024
AGR 6987.4 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FY 24/279683
100.5025.51431.00000 10,976.24118103
263.5021.51431.00000 9,493.21118103
540.5025.51431.00000 599.76118103
AGR 7144 (20-21.37) - LANDSCAPE MAINTENA79685
293.5025.51431.00000 1,359.42118023
294.5025.51431.00000 3,831.96118023
600.5025.51431.00000 5,413.73118023
Total : 58,448.95
427601 12/19/2024 004053 OCTA INV111329 AGR 7544 - 30-DAY BUS PASSES FOR ORANGE 263.7041.51780.30175 19,023.75118344
Total : 19,023.75
427602 12/19/2024 000052 OFFICE DEPOT INC 22973970 12.15.24 BI MONTHLY ACCT# 90646962 (BILL 100.2001.53011.00000 33.17
100.3011.53011.00000 87.92
100.4011.53011.00000 27.99
100.4031.53011.00000 68.16
100.4041.53011.00000 98.75
100.5001.53011.00000 54.00
100.6001.53011.00000 99.21
100.7001.53011.00000 65.75
34Page:
89 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
35 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427602 12/19/2024 (Continued)000052 OFFICE DEPOT INC
220.5022.53011.00000 146.37
600.8011.53011.00000 259.13
710.5023.53011.00000 156.93
100.1201.53011.00000 165.56
Total : 1,262.94
427603 12/19/2024 008254 OLPIN GROUP INC 5865 ROLLING FILE CABINET REPAIR 100.0401.51402.00000 5,536.00118371
100.0401.51402.00000 347.20
Total : 5,883.20
427604 12/19/2024 017108 ON TIME SIGNS 6199 DAVE AND BUSTER'S PARTNER BANNER 100.7011.51660.00000 80.81
Total : 80.81
427605 12/19/2024 020808 OPA ETC 5835-01 UB-REFUND
600.11080 260.38
Total : 260.38
427606 12/19/2024 019593 ORANGE CAR WASH INC 112024 (BLA) CARWASH FOR CITY VEHICLE FY 24/25 710.5023.53751.00000 171.00117914
Total : 171.00
427607 12/19/2024 000096 ORANGE CNTY TREASURER-TAX COLL SH70040 AGR 6447.4.2 FORENSIC SERVICES NOV 2024 100.4034.51780.00000 16,668.83118048
Total : 16,668.83
427608 12/19/2024 000096 ORANGE CNTY TREASURER-TAX COLL SH70139 AFIS BILLING NOV 2024 100.4034.51780.00000 4,158.00118190
Total : 4,158.00
427609 12/19/2024 013213 O'REILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES LLC NOVEMBER STMT 2024 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 2,674.03117888
Total : 2,674.03
427610 12/19/2024 000570 P J PRINTERS INC 226392 2024 DECEMBER PJPRINTERS INV# 226392 100.7001.53011.00000 74.00
35Page:
90 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
36 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427610 12/19/2024 (Continued)000570 P J PRINTERS INC
100.4011.51761.00000 74.00
100.7001.53011.00000 8.93
100.4011.51761.00000 8.93
100.7001.53011.00000 5.74
100.4011.51761.00000 5.73
Total : 177.33
427611 12/19/2024 020812 PAGANO, JOE Ref000295131 REFUND REM OF DEPOSIT FOR VISA # 9675 100.20005 73.75
Total : 73.75
427612 12/19/2024 001069 PARKHOUSE TIRE INC 1020288892 (BLA) TIRES FOR CITY VEHICLE FY 24/25 710.15102 1,815.77117916
Total : 1,815.77
427613 12/19/2024 019060 PARTS AUTHORITY LLC NOVEMBER STMT 2024 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 3,488.93117868
Total : 3,488.93
427614 12/19/2024 001325 PEST OPTIONS INC 447996 (BLA) RODENT CONTROL - FY 23/24 - REISSU 100.7022.51420.00000 225.00
Total : 225.00
427615 12/19/2024 000314 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 24-0790478-00 CREDIT MEMO - (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE TIRES FOR 710.5023.53750.00000 -50.00117984
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE TIRES FOR CITY VEHICLE24-0802543-00
710.5023.53750.00000 305.50117984
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE TIRES FOR CITY VEHICLE24-0802546-00
710.15102 101.29117984
Total : 356.79
427616 12/19/2024 020773 PETRA U, GILBERT 95315-00 UB-REFUND 600.11080 60.00
Total : 60.00
427617 12/19/2024 020365 PIVOTAL STRATEGIES LLC 1281 AGR 7660 - PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH 100.0000.52001.00000 10,395.26117714
36Page:
91 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
37 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427617 12/19/2024 (Continued)020365 PIVOTAL STRATEGIES LLC AGR 7660 - PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH1292
100.0000.52001.00000 8,125.00117714
Total : 18,520.26
427618 12/19/2024 001876 PRADO FAMILY SHOOTING RANGE 7266 FULL DAY TRAINING 12/10 & 12/13 100.4011.51780.00000 900.00117917
Total : 900.00
427619 12/19/2024 017564 PROTELESIS CORP A-100796 (BLA) CITYWIDE MONTHLY CARRIER CHARGES - 780.1601.51011.00000 886.86118152
(BLA) CITYWIDE MONTHLY CARRIER CHARGES -I-100763
780.1601.51011.00000 3,005.11118152
Total : 3,891.97
427620 12/19/2024 002778 PUMPING SOLUTIONS, A DXP CO 54828473 (BLA) PUMP REPAIR/REPLACEMENT, WATER DIV 600.8011.51402.00000 1,263.68118052
Total : 1,263.68
427621 12/19/2024 019634 RAMIREZ, FRANCISCO 120124 OPD PD TENT RENTAL 100.4001.53060.00000 420.00
Total : 420.00
427622 12/19/2024 016080 RAPIDS EXPRESS ORANGE, LP 184 (BLA) CAR WASH FOR CITY VEHICLE MAINTENA 710.5023.53751.00000 840.00118031
Total : 840.00
427623 12/19/2024 019651 RC EMPIRE CORP INC 3235 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR TO UNIT 1713 DUE TO AC 740.0312.52320.00000 3,042.27
AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR TO UNIT 2216 DUE TO AC3294
740.0312.52320.00000 2,776.93
Total : 5,819.20
427624 12/19/2024 001580 REACH EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE INC 122417 AGR 1823.X - EAP SERVICES YEAR 1 OF 2 - 100.1401.51670.00000 1,330.00117947
Total : 1,330.00
427625 12/19/2024 000331 RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE AC 855-1-52373 FY24-25 NOV - SAFETY BOOTS 37Page:
92 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
38 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427625 12/19/2024 (Continued)000331 RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE AC 730.0312.53940.00000 500.00
FY24-25 NOV - SAFETY BOOTS855-1-52569
730.0312.53940.00000 500.00
Total : 1,000.00
427626 12/19/2024 020805 ROJAS, EDGAR MARTINEZ 57508-03 UB-REFUND 600.11080 43.86
Total : 43.86
427627 12/19/2024 012784 S C SIGNS & SUPPLIES LLC 252548 (BLA) STREET SIGNS & MARKERS - FY 24/25 100.5073.53660.00000 219.81117869
(BLA) STREET SIGNS & MARKERS - FY 24/25254270
100.5073.53660.00000 999.92117869
Total : 1,219.73
427628 12/19/2024 020816 SAID, FADI REFUND SAID REFUND OF PLAN CHECK FEE, 24-WTR-8440/ 600.8011.47205.00000 595.00
Total : 595.00
427629 12/19/2024 020599 SALEM LUTHERAN CHURCH Ref000295128 REFUND REM OF DEPOSIT FOR CK # 2283 100.20005 762.75
Total : 762.75
427630 12/19/2024 011305 SAN CLEMENTE EMBROIDERY 0486 FY25 UNIFORM EMBROIDERY 100.3011.53030.00000 86.20
Total : 86.20
427631 12/19/2024 020179 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP 8106754147 TESTING OF FIRE HQ ELEVATOR FY 24/25 100.5028.51401.00000 1,922.99
Total : 1,922.99
427632 12/19/2024 000368 SCHORR METALS INC 1995516 SANTITATION SUPPLIES FOR MAINTENANCE 220.5022.53670.00000 135.62
Total : 135.62
427633 12/19/2024 001235 SERRANO WATER DISTRICT 177 PURCHASE WATER NOV.2024 600.8011.53420.00000 29,868.28
38Page:
93 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
39 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 29,868.28 427633 12/19/2024 001235 001235 SERRANO WATER DISTRICT 427634 12/19/2024 004604 SHRED-WISE INC 17620101524 2024 OCT. SHREDDING SERVICES 100.0301.53011.00000 50.00
OCT 2024 SHRED WISE-HR4612101724
100.1401.53011.00000 50.00
Total : 100.00
427635 12/19/2024 000376 SMART & FINAL IRIS CO #388 859066 / 063755 2024 DECEMBER SMART AND FINAL 859066 / 0 100.15101 2,228.40118352
100.15101 172.70
Total : 2,401.10
427636 12/19/2024 007786 METROLINK 219563 (BLA) FY 24-25 METROLINK PASSES CITY OF 100.20195 217.00117950
Total : 217.00
427637 12/19/2024 016994 SOCAL AUTO & TRUCK PARTS INC 903390 PM AND REPAIRS TO CITY BUIDLINGS 100.5028.51401.00000 1,555.38
CREDIT MEMO - PM AND REPAIRS TO CITY BUI904326
100.5028.51401.00000 -116.37
Total : 1,439.01
427638 12/19/2024 016994 NAPA AUTO PARTS NOVEMBER STMT 2024 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 744.71117991
Total : 744.71
427639 12/19/2024 020755 SOLTANI, HAMED REFUND 24-WTR-8434 CANCELED WATE PROJECT- PER OWNERS 600.8011.47170.00000 165.00
Total : 165.00
427640 12/19/2024 000718 SOUTH COAST AQMD 4450638 (BLA) GENERATORS, EMISSIONS, HOT SPOTS~ 600.8011.51401.00000 541.04117992
(BLA) GENERATORS, EMISSIONS, HOT SPOTS~4454581
600.8011.51401.00000 165.96117992
Total : 707.00
427641 12/19/2024 016802 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SHREDDING 270424 PD DOCUMENT SHREDDING FY 24-25 39Page:
94 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
40 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427641 12/19/2024 (Continued)016802 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SHREDDING 100.4011.51670.00000 130.00
Total : 130.00
427642 12/19/2024 000386 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO IN-0000628046 (BLA) CITYWIDE FUEL FY 24/25 710.15202 14,141.88117951
710.15204 4,674.61117951
Total : 18,816.49
427643 12/19/2024 000386 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO IN-0000025366 (BLA) DIESEL FUEL FY 24/25 710.15204 2,126.86117951
(BLA) DIESEL FUEL FY 24/25IN-0000027239
710.15204 1,762.37117951
(BLA) DIESEL FUEL FY 24/25IN-0000028309
710.15204 1,763.30117951
(BLA) DIESEL FUEL FY 24/25IN-0000033410
710.15204 2,196.64117951
Total : 7,849.17
427644 12/19/2024 000386 SC FUELS 0971623 (BLA) UNLEADED FUEL FY 24/25 710.15202 1,193.26117951
Total : 1,193.26
427645 12/19/2024 019361 SPECIALIZED RETAIL STORES LLC 220002054987 PD BIKE TEAM GRIPS AND PEDALS 245.4021.53060.12251 91.52
Total : 91.52
427646 12/19/2024 020807 SPICER, CYNTHIA 2306-01 UB-REFUND 600.11080 184.85
Total : 184.85
427647 12/19/2024 000877 INMARK IV00566155 2024 DECEMBER IMARK INV# IV00566155 100.7001.53011.00000 30.28
2024 NOVEMBER INMARK IV00566660IV00566660
100.3011.53011.00000 19.24
Total : 49.52
427648 12/19/2024 001197 DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELAT OSIP 72733 SELF INSURANCE PLANS - FY 24-25 40Page:
95 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
41 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427648 12/19/2024 (Continued)001197 DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELAT 730.0312.52233.00000 150,000.00118354
730.0312.52240.00000 11,864.01118354
Total : 161,864.01
427649 12/19/2024 001303 SUNRISE MULTISPECIALIST MED CT 00186269-00 2024 DEC. SERVICE DATE: 11/19 DS & BAT 730.0312.52210.00000 65.00
2024 DEC. SERVICE DATE: 12/10 DS DOT00186732-00
730.0312.52210.00000 40.00
2024 DEC. SERVICE DATE: 12/10 DS DOT00186762-00
730.0312.52210.00000 40.00
Total : 145.00
427650 12/19/2024 020260 SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING MGMT INC Ref000295133 REFUND REM OF DEPOSIT FOR CK # 127700181 100.20005 5,046.50
Total : 5,046.50
427651 12/19/2024 020353 SUSTAINABLE EMULSIONS LLC CS000223 (BLA) ASPHALT MATERIAL (GUARDTOP)~ FY 24 263.5021.53840.00000 59.26118345
Total : 59.26
427652 12/19/2024 013744 TAB PRODUCTS CO LLC INV000060718 PD RECORDS LABELS 100.4013.53011.00000 1,970.08
Total : 1,970.08
427653 12/19/2024 002978 TARGET SOLUTIONS LEARNING INV107854 AGR 7707 - TARGETSOLUTIONS TRAINING SOFT 100.3023.51780.00000 3,600.00118372
100.3022.51670.00000 8,075.00118372
Total : 11,675.00
427654 12/19/2024 001619 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 454239706 FY25 PEST CONTROL, STATION # 1 100.3021.51401.00000 104.00117892
FY25 PEST CONTROL, STATION # 2454239708
100.3021.51401.00000 98.00117892
FY25 PEST CONTROL, STATION # 3454239709
100.3021.51401.00000 93.00117892
FY25 PEST CONTROL, STATION # 4454239710
41Page:
96 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
42 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427654 12/19/2024 (Continued)001619 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 100.3021.51401.00000 89.00117892
FY25 PEST CONTROL, STATION # 5454239711
100.3021.51401.00000 86.00117892
FY25 PEST CONTROL, STATION # 6454239712
100.3021.51401.00000 124.00117892
FY25 PEST CONTROL, STATION # 7454239713
100.3021.51401.00000 102.00117892
FY25 PEST CONTROL, STATION # 8454239716
100.3021.51401.00000 106.00117892
Total : 802.00
427655 12/19/2024 001919 TETRA TECH INC 52269558 AGR 6780 - WELL 28 DESIGN 600.8011.56411.18120 32,264.37111937
AGR 6780 - WELL 28 DESIGN52292636
600.8011.56411.18120 9,770.70111937
AGR 6780 - WELL 28 DESIGN52340141
600.8011.56411.18120 21,400.75111937
Total : 63,435.82
427656 12/19/2024 015776 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIO INV102706 FY25 EMPLOYEE SUPPORT SERVICES, NOVEMBER 100.3021.51640.00000 500.00
Total : 500.00
427657 12/19/2024 020426 THE MODASSIC GROUP 4238 AGR 7680 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 952.9810.51670.20541 7,000.00117785
Total : 7,000.00
427658 12/19/2024 017439 DITCH WITCH WEST 666448 DITCH WITH REPAIR TO WATERPUMP 600.8011.51402.00000 4,507.57
Total : 4,507.57
427659 12/19/2024 016551 TIRE HUB LLC 46230036 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE TIRES FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 1,108.57117918
(BLA) AUTOMOTIVE TIRES FOR CITY VEHICLE46260238
710.15102 856.86117918
Total : 1,965.43
42Page:
97 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
43 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427660 12/19/2024 010714 TOTAL CORPORATE SOLUTIONS 9125 FY24-25: ERGONOMIC EQUIPMENT FOR RISK MA 740.0312.55131.00000 4,952.20
Total : 4,952.20
427661 12/19/2024 020771 TREMCO PRODUCTS INC 38057 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE MAINTE 710.15102 921.90
Total : 921.90
427662 12/19/2024 003155 TRI-AD 94288601 (BLA) TRI-AD FLEX SPENDING ADMIN FEES FY 100.1401.51670.00000 1,167.11117952
Total : 1,167.11
427663 12/19/2024 017374 TRIAD CONSULTING & SYSTEMS DES 1111 AGR 7069 - SECURITY CONSULTING AND DESIG 553.1601.56033.20347 1,360.00113738
AGR 7069 - SECURITY CONSULTING AND DESIG1120
553.1601.56033.20347 170.00113738
Total : 1,530.00
427664 12/19/2024 020135 TRULY NOLEN OF AMERICA INC 650225921 (BLA) PEST CONTROL FOR CITY LEMON PARKIN 100.5028.51450.20421 150.00118089
Total : 150.00
427665 12/19/2024 002977 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 045-494628 AGR 7662 - ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING 600.1222.56510.20391 3,557.25117724
790.1601.56033.20391 10,842.75117724
Total : 14,400.00
427666 12/19/2024 000001 U S ARMOR CORP 48338 PD VESTS: K LAWSON 100.4011.53940.00000 777.20117994
PD VESTS: J MACIEL48339
100.4011.53940.00000 777.20117994
Total : 1,554.40
427667 12/19/2024 013781 ULTIMATE MAINTENANCE SERVICES 34648 AGR 7196.1 (20-21.42) CUSTODIAL SERVICES 100.5028.51422.00000 17,916.66118167
Total : 17,916.66
427668 12/19/2024 000944 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 00005733W1504 - 2025 12/14/24 UPS WEEKLY SHIPMENT 43Page:
98 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
44 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427668 12/19/2024 (Continued)000944 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 100.5001.51021.00000 35.90
100.4011.51021.00000 28.13
100.5074.53670.00000 65.40
Total : 129.43
427669 12/19/2024 019230 UNITED RENTALS INC 242072715-001 (BLA) MATERIAL & EQUIPMENT RENTAL - FY24 263.5021.53840.00000 288.78117872
(BLA) MATERIAL & EQUIPMENT RENTAL - FY24242125280-001
263.5021.53840.00000 288.78117872
Total : 577.56
427670 12/19/2024 000551 V & V MANUFACTURING INC 60796 PD BADGE REPAIRS: 1457 100.4011.53030.00000 83.06
PD BADGE REPAIRS: 92860822
100.4011.53030.00000 591.19
Total : 674.25
427671 12/19/2024 020777 VELAZQUEZ, VICTOR 92375-09 UB-REFUND 600.11080 56.53
Total : 56.53
427672 12/19/2024 019878 VERDE DESIGN INC 8-2319700 AGR 7642 (23-24.10) EL MODENA PARK BALL 512.7021.56020.30048 3,268.00117745
Total : 3,268.00
427673 12/19/2024 016948 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73180742 PD PRIVATE IP CHARGES THROUGH 11/30/24 355.4011.51030.00000 1,843.00117873
350.4041.51030.00000 157.00117873
355.4011.51030.00000 57.19
350.4041.51030.00000 4.87
Total : 2,062.06
427674 12/19/2024 001845 VERIZON WIRELESS 6100795845 11/11/24-12/10/24 ACCT# 342321417 - FINA 100.1205.51011.00000 108.31
11/11/24-12/10/24 ACCT# 342321452 - PUBL6100795846
220.5022.51030.00000 1,063.40
44Page:
99 12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
45 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427674 12/19/2024 (Continued)001845 VERIZON WIRELESS
270.5021.51030.00000 721.59
710.5023.51030.00000 151.91
100.5011.51030.00000 37.98
220.1601.56033.20285 37.99
100.5001.51030.00000 1,784.99
11/11/24-12/10/24 ACCT# 442321341 - COMM6100812508
100.7001.51011.00000 1,619.35
11/11/24-12/10/24 ACCT# 742321116 - INFO6100863086
100.0201.51030.00000 94.56
780.1601.51011.00000 256.10
780.1601.51030.00000 145.90
11/11/24-12/10/24 ACCT# 461043674 - FIRE6100863086B
100.0201.53061.00000 -28.17
PD MDC WIRELESS CHARGES NOV 11 - DEC 106100895261
355.4011.51030.00000 4,147.99117874
11/11/24-12/10/24 ACCT# 942320948 - COMM6100896630
100.6032.51030.00000 66.97
100.6031.51030.00000 427.57
100.5011.51030.00000 210.76
110.6001.56510.20482 160.16
11/11/24-12/10/24 ACCT# 942320990 - WATE6100896632
600.8011.51030.00000 2,778.80
Total : 13,786.16
427675 12/19/2024 009050 VULCAN MATERIALS CO 2375000 (BLA) ASPHALT MATERIAL - FY 24/25 263.5021.53840.00000 645.29117893
Total : 645.29
427676 12/19/2024 000431 W W GRAINGER INC 9341884949 (BLA) PARTS & SUPPLIES FOR MAINTENANCE O 600.8011.51510.00000 221.78118068
(BLA) PARTS & SUPPLIES FOR MAINTENANCE O9342941813
600.8011.51510.00000 42.39118068
Total : 264.17
427677 12/19/2024 016240 EVANS GUN WORLD 2223 RANGE FEES 10/30/24 100.4011.51840.00000 480.00
45Page:
100
12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
46 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427677 12/19/2024 (Continued)016240 EVANS GUN WORLD
RANGE FEES 11/22/242224
100.4011.51840.00000 240.00
Total : 720.00
427678 12/19/2024 002319 WATERLINE TECHNOLOGIES 5718681 (BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR 600.8011.53530.00000 580.47117955
(BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR5718682
600.8011.53530.00000 414.62117955
(BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR5718683
600.8011.53530.00000 503.93117955
(BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR5718685
600.8011.53530.00000 446.52117955
(BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR5718686
600.8011.53530.00000 893.03117955
(BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR5718691
600.8011.53530.00000 733.56117955
(BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR5719655
600.8011.53530.00000 430.57117955
(BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR5719656
600.8011.53530.00000 803.73117955
(BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR5719657
600.8011.53530.00000 462.46117955
(BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR5719659
600.8011.53530.00000 854.76117955
(BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR5719660
600.8011.53530.00000 554.96117955
(BLA) PURCHASE OF LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHOR5719662
600.8011.53530.00000 727.18117955
Total : 7,405.79
427679 12/19/2024 000440 WEST COAST SAND & GRAVEL INC 787917 (BLA) SAND & ASPHALT SUPPLIES - WATER DI 600.8041.55451.00000 521.59117997
Total : 521.59
427680 12/19/2024 000448 WILLDAN ENGINEERING 002-33291 AGR 7738 - ON CALL BUILDING AND SAFETY S 100.6031.51670.00000 185.90118293
46Page:
101
12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
47 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 427680 12/19/2024 (Continued)000448 WILLDAN ENGINEERING AGR 7738 - ON CALL BUILDING AND SAFETY S002333290
100.6031.51670.00000 5,525.00118293
Total : 5,710.90
427681 12/19/2024 002111 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 010-60746 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT ADMIN JANU 878.20354 1,274.61
877.20354 1,052.29
SPECIAL DISTRICT ADMIN JAN 2025 THRU MAR010-60747
291.7024.51670.00000 285.82
293.7024.51670.00000 142.91
600.1222.51700.00000 80.21
Total : 2,835.84
427682 12/19/2024 016092 WINZER CORPORATION 2748105 (BLA) AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLE 710.15102 324.25117958
Total : 324.25
427683 12/19/2024 001759 WITTMAN ENTERPRISES LLC 2409022 SEPTEMBER 2024 PARAMEDIC COMMISSION 100.3022.46718.00000 8,210.65
125.3015.46718.00000 12,842.29
OCTOBER 2024 PARAMEDIC COMMISSION2410022
100.3022.46718.00000 8,146.68
125.3015.46718.00000 12,742.25
Total : 41,941.87
427684 12/19/2024 002801 YO FIRE SUPPLIES 1030709 (BLA) MAINLINE SUPPLIES - WATER DIVISION 600.8041.55451.00000 1,082.60118113
(BLA) MAINLINE SUPPLIES - WATER DIVISION1030752
600.8041.55451.00000 1,349.77118113
Total : 2,432.37
427685 12/19/2024 001153 ZOLL MEDICAL CORP 4087449 (BLA) MEDICAL SUPPLIES FY 24/25 125.3022.53510.00000 1,362.84117876
125.3022.53510.00000 105.62
Total : 1,468.46
47Page:
102
12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
48 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 12172024 12/17/2024 000384 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 12/15/24 UTILITIES 100.0000.51231.00000 26,364.60
600.8011.51232.00000 206,942.36
Total : 233,306.96
12182024 12/18/2024 000384 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 12/15/24-2 UTILITIES 100.0000.51231.00000 4,842.56
Total : 4,842.56
Bank total : 1,837,394.72 263 Vouchers for bank code : wfap 1,837,394.72Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 263 48Page:
103
12/19/2024
Voucher List
City of Orange
49 12:15:20PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code : wfap
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 49Page:
104
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.3. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0012
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Pamela Coleman, City Clerk/City Clerk Services Director

1. SUBJECT
Approval of minutes of the City of Orange City Council Regular Meeting held on December 10, 2024.

2. SUMMARY
Submitted for your consideration and approval are the minutes of the above meeting.

3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve minutes as presented.

4. ATTACHMENTS
· December 10, 2024, Regular Meeting minutes
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
105
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.3. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0012
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Pamela Coleman, City Clerk/City Clerk Services Director

1. SUBJECT
Approval of minutes of the City of Orange City Council Regular Meeting held on December 10, 2024.

2. SUMMARY
Submitted for your consideration and approval are the minutes of the above meeting.

3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve minutes as presented.

4. ATTACHMENTS
· December 10, 2024, Regular Meeting minutes
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
106
City of Orange
City Council
December 10, 2024

MINUTES - DRAFT
The City Council of the City of Orange, California convened on Tuesday, December 10, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. in a Regular Meeting in the Council Chamber, 300 E. Chapman Avenue, Orange, California.
6:00 PM REGULAR SESSION

1. OPENING/CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Slater called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.

1.1 INVOCATION
Given by Rev. Dr. Timothy Klinkenberg from St. John’s Lutheran Church.

1.2 PRESENTATION OF COLORS/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Colors were presented by the Orange High School Marine Corps JROTC Color Guard and the Pledge of Allegiance was led by Cadet Gunnery Sergeant Samuel Register.

1.3 NATIONAL ANTHEM
Sung by Ximena Martinez, Orange High School Choir.

1.4 ROLL CALL

Present: Barrios, Dumitru, Tavoularis, Gutierrez, Bilodeau, Gyllenhammer, and Slater

Absent: None

1.5 ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mayor Slater recognized dignitaries in attendance.

2. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and are enacted by one motion approving the recommended action listed on the Agenda. Any member of the City Council, staff, or the public may request an item be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion or separate action. Unless otherwise specified in the request to remove an item from the Consent Calendar, all items removed shall be considered immediately following action on the remaining items on the Consent Calendar.

2.1. Waive reading in full of all ordinances on the Agenda.

ACTION: Approved.

Page 1 of 4 ends

Draft
107
City Council Minutes - Draft December 10, 2024

2.2. Confirmation of accounts payable warrant registers dated November 7, 14, 21, and 27, 2024 and payroll check warrants dated November 8, and 22, 2024.

ACTION: Ratified the accompanying registers.

2.3. Approval of minutes of the City of Orange City Council Regular Meeting held on November 26, 2024.

ACTION: Approved minutes as presented.

2.4. Second Reading and adoption of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Orange amending Chapter 8.06 of the Orange Municipal Code establishing mandatory shopping cart retrieval plan and containment system. Ordinance No . 30-24.

ACTION: Adopted Ordinance No. 30-24.

2.5. Second Reading and adoption of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Orange adopting Objective Design Standards by reference in Title 17 for qualified housing projects. Ordinance No. 31-24.

A speaker card was submitted for Item 2.5; therefore, the item was removed from the Consent Calendar for separate consideration.

Public Speaker:

Kathy Voss spoke in support of adoption.

ACTION: A motion was made by Mayor pro tem Barrios, seconded by Councilmember Gutierrez, to adopt Ordinance No. 31-24. The motion carried by the following vote:

Barrios, Dumitru, Tavoularis, Gutierrez, Bilodeau, Gyllenhammer, and SlaterAyes:

NoneNoes:

NoneAbsent:

2.6. Second Reading and adoption of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Orange amending Chapter 10.10 of the Orange Municipal Code Pertaining to Prohibition on Repairs and Sales of Bicycles and Bicycle Parts on Public Property. Ordinance No. 32-24.

ACTION: Adopted Ordinance No. 32-24.

2.7. Declaration of election results for the November 5, 2024, General Municipal Election. Resolution No. 11583.

ACTION: Adopted Resolution No. 11583. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange reciting the fact of the General Municipal Election held on November 5, 2024, and declaring the results and such other matters as provided by law.

2.8. Part-Time and Limited Duration employees’ classification, compensation, and terms of employment for the period of January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025 and Citywide Pay Schedule. Resolution Nos. 11587 and 11588.

ACTION: 1) Adopted Resolution No. 11587. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange repealing Resolution No. 11503 and amendments thereto and approving provisions relating to the classification, compensation, and terms of employment of Part-Time and Limited Duration employees effective January 1, 2025 through and

Page 2 of 4 ends

Draft
108
City Council Minutes - Draft December 10, 2024
including December 31, 2025.
2) Adopted Resolution No. 11588. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange Rescinding Resolution No. 11578 and amending the Citywide Pay schedule in accordance with the requirements of California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5.

Approval of the Consent Calendar
Item 2.5 was removed from the Consent Calendar and heard separately. All other items were approved as recommended.

A motion was made by Councilmember Gutierrez, seconded by Councilmember Dumitru, to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion carried by the following vote:

Barrios, Dumitru, Tavoularis, Gutierrez, Bilodeau, Gyllenhammer, and SlaterAyes:

NoneNoes:

NoneAbsent:

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
* * * * * * * *

3. OATH OF OFFICE CEREMONY
Honorable Gaddi Vasquez administered the Oath of Office to Mayor -Elect Dan Slater and District 2 Councilmember-Elect Jon Dumitru. Former Mayor pro tem Mike Spurgeon administered the Oath of Office to District 3 Councilmember-Elect Kathy Tavoularis. Orange County Supervisor Vicente Sarmiento administered the Oath of Office to District 5 Councilmember-Elect Ana Gutierrez. Deputy City Clerk Jennifer Connally administered the Oath of Office to City Clerk -Elect Pamela Coleman. Valerie Smith administered the Oath of Office to City Treasurer-Elect Garrett Smith.

4. REMARKS BY RE-ELECTED AND NEWLY ELECTED OFFICIALS
Remarks were made by re-elected and newly elected officials.

5. CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION

5.1. Selection of Mayor pro tempore.

A motion was made by Mayor pro tem Barrios, seconded by Councilmember Dumitru, to nominate Councilmember Gutierrez to serve as Mayor pro tem.

During discussion a motion was made by Councilmember Tavoularis, seconded by Councilmember Gyllenhammer, to nominate Councilmember Bilodeau to serve as Mayor pro tem.

A motion was made by Councilmember Tavoularis, seconded by Councilmember Gyllenhammer, to nominate Councilmember Bilodeau to serve as Mayor pro tempore for a two -year term effective December 11, 2024. The motion carried by the following vote:

Tavoularis, Bilodeau, Gyllenhammer, and SlaterAyes:

Barrios, Dumitru, and GutierrezNoes:

NoneAbsent:

Page 3 of 4 ends

Draft
109
City Council Minutes - Draft December 10, 2024

6. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Written Public Comment
Janice Brownfield submitted an email about reducing air pollution.

7. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m.

The next Regular City Council meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 14, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber, with Closed Session beginning at 5:00 p.m., if necessary.
______________________ _________________________ PAMELA COLEMAN DANIEL R. SLATER

CITY CLERK MAYOR

Page 4 of 4 ends

Draft
110
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.4. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0010
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney

1. SUBJECT
First Amendment to Attorney Services Agreement with Law Offices of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore to provide legal services relating to personnel matters.

2. SUMMARY
The City currently has an agreement with the Law Offices of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore to provide legal services relating to police disciplinary, investigative, and appeal matters for an amount not to exceed $30,000, which has been expended. The proposed First Amendment will increase the agreement by $70,000 for a total not to exceed amount of $100,000.

3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve the First Amendment to Attorney Services Agreement with the Law Offices of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore in the amount of $70,000; and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute on behalf of the City.

4. FISCAL IMPACT
The expense for this agreement is $70,000 and will be funded through General Fund (100):
100.0301.51600.00000 Legal Services

5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 2: Be a fiscally healthy community
a: Expend fiscal resources responsibly.

6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
While the City Attorney’sOffice handles most litigation matters in-house, the City does contract with outside counsel when the complexity of a case or a significant burden to staff time requires additional staffing expertise.

The First Amendment of the agreement will increase the contract by $70,000, for a total not to exceed amount of $100,000, and is necessary to carry out further defense of the City.

7. ATTACHMENT
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
111
Item #: 3.4. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0010
· First Amendment to Attorney Services Agreement
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
112
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.4. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0010
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney

1. SUBJECT
First Amendment to Attorney Services Agreement with Law Offices of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore to provide legal services relating to personnel matters.

4. FISCAL IMPACT
The expense for this agreement is $70,000 and will be funded through General Fund (100):
100.0301.51600.00000 Legal Services

5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 2: Be a fiscally healthy community
a: Expend fiscal resources responsibly.

The First Amendment of the agreement will increase the contract by $70,000, for a total not to exceed amount of $100,000, and is necessary to carry out further defense of the City.

7. ATTACHMENT
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
113
Item #: 3.4. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0010
· First Amendment to Attorney Services Agreement
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
114
115
116
117
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.5. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0016
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Sean deMetropolis, Fire Chief

1. SUBJECT
Participate in a one-time Public Provider Ground Emergency Medical Transportation Intergovernmental Transfer Program with the California Department of Health Care Services.

2. SUMMARY
A request for City Council approval to participate in a one-time Public Provider Ground Emergency Medical Transportation Intergovernmental Transfer Program for the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2025, to access additional Federal Medicaid dollars to support unreimbursed care.

3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve agreements with the California Department of Health Care Services in the amount of $1,100,000, plus a $110,000 assessment fee to the California Department of Health Care Services for managing the Public Provider Ground Emergency Medical Transportation program, payable in quarterly Intergovernmental Transfers; and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute on behalf of the City.

4. FISCAL IMPACT
Reimbursable funds of $1,100,000 will be used to obtain approximately $2,000,000 in previously unreimbursed Medicaid revenue add-ons, resulting in a net benefit of $900,000, and will be advanced through the General Fund (100) respectively: 100.1103.

5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Provide for a Safe Community
b: Provide and maintain infrastructure necessary to ensure the safety of the public.

Goal 2: Be a Fiscally Healthy Community
b: Expend fiscal resources responsibly.

6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
An Intergovernmental Transfer (IGT) allows California’s Medi-Cal Managed Care and Fee For Service plans to partner with local units of government to access additional Federal Medicaid dollars and use them to support unreimbursed care and provide health care services. The City has participated in IGT programs for Federal funds for unreimbursed care since 2014. In 2019, AB 1705 was signed into law, creating the Public Provider Ground Emergency Medical Transportation (PP- GEMT) program. Per transport, the total reimbursement under the new PP-GEMT IGT Program is City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
118
Item #: 3.5. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0016
GEMT) program. Per transport, the total reimbursement under the new PP-GEMT IGT Program is higher than what was received historically under the existing GEMT Quality Assurance Fee (QAF) program, but the provider contribution through the IGTs is also expected to be higher than QAF payments when compared to a per transport basis. These contributions are voluntary; however, if the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) determines that the projected amount of voluntary contributions is not sufficient to support the implementation of the program, the program would not be continued in future rating periods. If the program ends, public GEMT providers would revert to reimbursement under existing programs, including the GEMT Certified Public Expenditure (CPE) Supplemental Payment Program (AB 678) and GEMT-QAF (SB 523).

Payments for this program will require four quarterly installments, with the first transfer due in January 2025. Estimates for Calendar Year (CY) 2025 PP-GEMT reimbursements provided by DHCS for Medi-Cal Managed Care and Fee For Service Plans are below.

IGT Contribution from City $1,100,000
10% Admin Fee $110,000
Total IGT Transfer to DHCS for CY 2025 Program $1,210,000 Estimated unreimbursed IGT Revenue available $2,110,000 Estimated Net Revenue $900,000

7. ATTACHMENTS
· Attachment 1 DHCS IGT Certification Form for CY 2025
· Attachment 2 DHCS CY 2025 Invoice #1
· Attachment 3 Assembly Bill 1705 (AB 1705)
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
119
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.5. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0016
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Sean deMetropolis, Fire Chief

1. SUBJECT
Participate in a one-time Public Provider Ground Emergency Medical Transportation Intergovernmental Transfer Program with the California Department of Health Care Services.

5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Provide for a Safe Community
b: Provide and maintain infrastructure necessary to ensure the safety of the public.

Goal 2: Be a Fiscally Healthy Community
b: Expend fiscal resources responsibly.

6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
An Intergovernmental Transfer (IGT) allows California’s Medi-Cal Managed Care and Fee For Service plans to partner with local units of government to access additional Federal Medicaid dollars and use them to support unreimbursed care and provide health care services. The City has participated in IGT programs for Federal funds for unreimbursed care since 2014. In 2019, AB 1705 was signed into law, creating the Public Provider Ground Emergency Medical Transportation (PP- GEMT) program. Per transport, the total reimbursement under the new PP-GEMT IGT Program is City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
120
Item #: 3.5. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0016
GEMT) program. Per transport, the total reimbursement under the new PP-GEMT IGT Program is higher than what was received historically under the existing GEMT Quality Assurance Fee (QAF) program, but the provider contribution through the IGTs is also expected to be higher than QAF payments when compared to a per transport basis. These contributions are voluntary; however, if the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) determines that the projected amount of voluntary contributions is not sufficient to support the implementation of the program, the program would not be continued in future rating periods. If the program ends, public GEMT providers would revert to reimbursement under existing programs, including the GEMT Certified Public Expenditure (CPE) Supplemental Payment Program (AB 678) and GEMT-QAF (SB 523).

7. ATTACHMENTS
· Attachment 1 DHCS IGT Certification Form for CY 2025
· Attachment 2 DHCS CY 2025 Invoice #1
· Attachment 3 Assembly Bill 1705 (AB 1705)
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
121
122
123
124
Entity Information: Due Date: 1/17/2025
Payment Details:

Year: 2025 Collection #: 1
1922004555
Program/Payee Information: Banking Information:

PP-GEMT Program Email: Payment Methods Accepted:

[email protected] ACH or Wire Transfer
Payment Instructions:

IGT Non-Federal Share (NFS) Breakdown By DHCS Delivery System Managed Care (MC)
MC NFS #1 $198,596.36
MC Admin Fee #1 $0.00
Fee For Service (FFS)
FFS NFS #1 $20,354.26
FFS Admin Fee #1 $0.00
$218,950.62Total* IGT Transfer Amount:
*Any differences are due to rounding.

California Department of Health Care Services US Bank
Please await Wire Request Memo for payment instructions Attention: Please review, sign, and submit the Intergovernmental Transfer (IGT) Certification form by January 3, 2025, to [email protected]. IGT Certification forms are required to be submitted prior to each collection due date. Once the IGT Certification form is received, DHCS will send a Wire Request Memo providing payment details and instructions.

Please do not send your IGT payment until you have received the Wire Request Memo as payment details are subject to change.

NPI:

Total Amount Due: $218,950.62
Vendor Name: Bank Name:

PUBLIC PROVIDER GROUND EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION (PP-GEMT) PROGRAM MANAGED CARE AND FEE FOR SERVICE — INVOICE
Entity Name:

City Of Orange
125
Assembly Bill No. 1705
CHAPTER 544
An act to amend Sections 14105.94, 14129, and 14129.3, and to add Section 14105.945 to, the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to Medi-Cal.
[Approved by Governor October 7, 2019. Filed with Secretary of State October 7, 2019.]
legislative counsel’s digest
AB 1705, Bonta. Medi-Cal: emergency medical transportation services.

Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions.

Existing law authorizes a Medi-Cal provider of ground emergency medical transportation services, that is owned or operated by the state, a city, county, city and county, fire protection district, special district, community services district, health care district, or a federally recognized Indian tribe, to receive supplemental Medi-Cal reimbursement, in addition to the rate of payment the eligible provider would otherwise receive for those services. Existing law requires the department to de velop a modified supplemental reimbursement program, with necessary federal approvals, that would seek to increase the reimb ursement to the abo ve-described eligible pro viders.

Existing la w requires the nonfederal share of an y supplemental reimbursement provided under the modified program to be deri ved from voluntary intergovernmental transfers of local funds. Existing la w states the Le gislature’s intent in enacting these pro visions to pro vide the supplemental reimb ursement without an y e xpenditure from the General Fund.

The bill would instead require the department to implement, subject to any necessary federal approvals, and no sooner than July 1, 2021, the Public Provider Intergovernmental Transfer Program (program), for the duration of an y Medi-Cal managed care rating period, and w ould authorize the department to continue conducting any administrative duties related to the above-specified supplemental Medi-Cal reimb ursement. The bill w ould require an eligible pro vider, defined, in part, as a pro vider of emer gency medical transport, to receive an add-on increase to the associated Medi-Cal fee-for-service payment schedule, and w ould require the department to develop the add-on increase pursuant to specified standards, including an eligible provider’s average cost directly associated with providing a Medi-Cal emergency medical transport under the Medi-Cal program. The bill would require Medi-Cal managed care health plans and emer gency medical

90 126696
transport providers to comply with specified federal standards relating to the payment standards for emer gency medical transport. The bill w ould limit the amount that a noncontract eligible pro vider may collect for emergency medical transport. The bill w ould require the department to assess a 10% fee on each transfer of public funds to the state to pay for health care coverage and to reimburse the department for its administrative costs relating to the program. The bill w ould limit the operation of the program on the condition that the program w ould be financially and programmatically supporti ve of the Medi-Cal program. The bill w ould authorize the department to implement these provisions by various means, including all-county letters or provider bulletins, without taking regulatory action.

Existing la w, the Medi-Cal Emer gency Medical Transportation Reimbursement Act, commencing July 1, 2018, and subject to federal approval and the a vailability of federal financial participation, imposes a quality assurance fee for each emergency medical transport provided by an emergency medical transport provider subject to the fee in accordance with a prescribed methodology. Existing law requires the Director of Health Care Services to deposit the collected quality assurance fee into the continuously appropriated Medi-Cal Emergency Medical Transport Fund, for exclusive use in a specified order of priority , including to enhance federal financial participation for ambulance services under the Medi-Cal program. Existing law requires each emer gency medical transport pro vider to report to the department specified data and material, including the number of actual emergency medical transports by payer type. The act increases Medi-Cal reimbursement to emer gency medical transport pro viders for emer gency medical transports.

The bill w ould exempt an eligible pro vider from the quality assurance fee and add-on increase for the duration of an y Medi-Cal managed care rating during which the Public Provider Intergovernmental Transfer Program is implemented.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. Section 14105.94 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:
14105.94. (a) An eligible provider, as described in subdivision (b), may, in addition to the rate of payment that the provider would otherwise receive for Medi-Cal ground emer gency medical transportation services, recei ve supplemental Medi-Cal reimbursement to the extent provided in this section. (b) A provider shall be eligible for supplemental reimb ursement if the provider has all of the following characteristics continuously during a state fiscal year:
(1) Provides ground emer gency medical transportation services to Medi-Cal beneficiaries.
90 — 2 — Ch. 544

127697
(2)  Is a provider that is enrolled as a Medi-Cal pro vider for the period being claimed.
(3)  Is owned or operated by the state, a city, county, city and county, fire protection district organized pursuant to Part 2.7 (commencing with Section 13800) of Di vision 12 of the Health and Safety Code, special district organized pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 58000) of Division 1 of Title 6 of the Government Code, community services district organized pursuant to Part 1 (commencing with Section 61000) of Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code, health care district organized pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 32000) of Division 23 of the Health and Safety Code, or a federally recognized Indian tribe. (c)  An eligible provider’s supplemental reimbursement pursuant to this section shall be calculated and paid as follows:
(1)  The supplemental reimbursement to an eligible provider, as described in subdi vision (b), shall be equal to the amount of federal financial participation recei ved as a result of the claims submitted pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (f).
(2)  The amount certified pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdi vision (e), when combined with the amount recei ved from all other sources of reimbursement from the Medi-Cal program, shall not e xceed 100 percent of actual costs, as determined pursuant to the Medi-Cal State Plan, for ground emergency medical transportation services.
(3)  The supplemental Medi-Cal reimbursement provided by this section shall be distrib uted e xclusively to eligible pro viders under a payment methodology based on ground emer gency medical transportation services provided to Medi-Cal beneficiaries by eligible providers on a per-transport basis or other federally permissible basis. The department shall obtain approval from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for the payment methodology to be utilized, and may not mak e any payment pursuant to this section prior to obtaining that approval. (d)  (1)  It is the Le gislature’s intent in enacting this section to pro vide the supplemental reimb ursement described in this section without an y expenditure from the General Fund. An eligible provider, as a condition of receiving supplemental reimbursement pursuant to this section, shall enter into, and maintain, an agreement with the department for the purposes of implementing this section and reimbursing the department for the costs of administering this section.
(2)  The nonfederal share of the supplemental reimbursement submitted to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for purposes of claiming federal financial participation shall be paid only with funds from the governmental entities described in paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) and certified to the state as provided in subdivision (e).
(e)  Participation in the program by an eligible provider described in this section is v oluntary. If an applicable go vernmental entity elects to seek supplemental reimbursement pursuant to this section on behalf of an eligible provider owned or operated by the entity, as described in paragraph (3) of subdivision (b), the governmental entity shall do all of the following:
90 Ch. 544 — 3 —

128698
(1)  Certify, in conformity with the requirements of Section 433.51 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, that the claimed expenditures for the ground emer gency medical transportation services are eligible for federal financial participation.
(2)  Provide e vidence supporting the certification as specified by the department.
(3)  Submit data as specified by the department to determine the appropriate amounts to claim as expenditures qualifying for federal financial participation.
(4)  Keep, maintain, and ha ve readily retrievable, any records specified by the department to fully disclose reimb ursement amounts to which the eligible provider is entitled, and an y other records required by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
(f)  (1)  The department shall promptly seek an y necessary federal approvals for the implementation of this section. The department may limit the program to those costs that are allowable expenditures under Title XIX of the federal Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 1396 et seq.). If federal approval is not obtained for implementation of this section, this section shall not be implemented.
(2)  The department shall submit claims for federal financial participation for the e xpenditures for the services described in subdi vision (e) that are allowable expenditures under federal law.
(3)  The department shall annually submit any necessary materials to the federal government to provide assurances that claims for federal financial participation will include only those expenditures that are allowable under federal law.
(g)  (1)  If a final judicial determination is made by any court of appellate jurisdiction or a final determination is made by the administrator of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that the supplemental reimbursement provided for in this section must be made to an y provider not described in this section, the director shall execute a declaration stating that the determination has been made and on that date this section shall become inoperative.
(2)  The declaration executed pursuant to this subdivision shall be retained by the director, provided to the fiscal and appropriate policy committees of the Legislature, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Senate, the Chief Clerk of the Assembly, and the Le gislative Counsel, and posted on the department’s internet website.
(h)  Notwithstanding Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, the department may implement and administer this section by means of pro vider bulletins, or similar instructions, without taking regulatory action. (i)  Notwithstanding any other law, this section shall become inoperative during the entirety of an y Medi-Cal managed care rating period in which Section 14105.945 is implemented, in whole or in part. The department may conduct any necessary and remaining administrati ve duties related to an y time period during which this provision remained operative, even after this 90 — 4 — Ch. 544

129699
section becomes inoperative, and may recei ve all compensation for those activities until paid in full.
(j) The department, in its sole discretion, may determine it has received all compensation for acti vities conducted pursuant to this section and completed all administrative duties related to time periods when this section was operative.

SEC. 2. Section 14105.945 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:
14105.945. (a)  For purposes of this section, the follo wing definitions apply:
(1)  “Eligible pro vider” means a pro vider who is eligible for reimbursement of Medi-Cal emergency medical transports pursuant to this section, and who continually meets all of the following requirements during the entirety of any Medi-Cal managed care rating period that this section is implemented:
(A)  Provides emergency medical transports to Medi-Cal beneficiaries. (B)  Is enrolled as a Medi-Cal provider for the period being claimed. (C)  Is owned or operated by the state, a city , county, city and county , fire protection district or ganized pursuant to P art 2.7 (commencing with Section 13800) of Division 12 of the Health and Safety Code, special district organized pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 58000) of Division 1 of Title 6 of the Government Code, community services district organized pursuant to Part 1 (commencing with Section 61000) of Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code, health care district organized pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 32000) of Division 23 of the Health and Safety Code, or a federally recognized Indian tribe. (2)  (A)  “Emergency medical transport” means the act of transporting an individual from any point of origin to the nearest medical facility capable of meeting the emer gency medical needs of the patient by an amb ulance licensed, operated, and equipped in accordance with applicable state or local statutes, ordinances, or regulations that are billed with billing codes A0429 BLS Emer gency, A0434 Specialty Care Transport, A0225 Neonatal Emergency Transport, A0427 ALS Emergency, and A0433 ALS2, and any equivalent, predecessor, or successor billing codes, as may be determined by the director.
(B)  “Emergency medical transport” shall not include transportation of beneficiaries by passenger car, taxicab, litter van, wheelchair van, or other forms of public or pri vate conveyances, nor shall it include transportation by an air ambulance provider. An “emergency medical transport” does not occur if a transport is not provided following evaluation of a patient. (3)  “Medi-Cal managed care rating period” means a period selected by the department for which the actuarially sound capitation rates are developed and documented in the rate certification that the department submits to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as required by Section 438.7(a) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations. (b)  (1)  Commencing no sooner than July 1, 2021, the department shall implement the Public Pro vider Inter governmental Transfer Program 90 Ch. 544 — 5 —

130700
(program) pursuant to this section for an y Medi-Cal managed care rating period that the department has obtained necessary federal approvals. (2)  Notwithstanding any other law, during the entirety of any Medi-Cal managed care rating period for which the requirements of this section are implemented, in whole or in part, supplemental Medi-Cal reimbursements described in Section 14105.94 shall become inoperative. (c)  To the e xtent authorized under federal and state la w, an eligible provider shall receive increased reimbursement by application of an add-on increase, as determined pursuant to subdi vision (d), to the associated Medi-Cal fee-for-service payment schedule for emergency medical transports provided to applicable Medi-Cal beneficiaries.
(d)  The department shall de velop the state wide add-on increase to be provided under the program as follows:
(1)  The department shall determine an initial statewide add-on increase that is based on the most recent audited cost reports of eligible pro viders available at the time the add-on increase is developed, as determined by the department. In determining the initial state wide add-on increase, the department may make adjustments to account for inflation, trend, or other material changes, as appropriate under federal law and actuarial standards. (2)  The initial statewide add-on increase shall represent the dif ference between both of the following:
(A)  The a verage reimb ursement paid pursuant to the applicable base Medi-Cal fee-for-service payment fee schedule for an emer gency medical transport during the time period of the applicable cost-report to an eligible provider, and weighted according to those services provided by all eligible providers during the applicable time period.
(B)  The a verage cost directly associated with pro viding a Medi-Cal emergency medical transport under the Medi-Cal program by an eligible provider during the time period of the applicable cost-report, as determined based on all eligible pro viders’ audited cost reports pursuant to paragraph (1), and weighted according to those services pro vided by all eligible providers during the applicable time period.
(3)  For subsequent Medi-Cal managed care rating periods, the department, in consultation with participating eligible providers, and as determined by the department, may adjust periodically the initial statewide add-on increase to account for inflation, trend adjustments, or other material changes, as appropriate under federal law and actuarial standards.
(4)  To the extent that the department deems practicable, the department shall set a schedule for determining the state wide add-on increase before the department submits to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services actuarially sound Medi-Cal managed care rates for an applicable Medi-Cal managed care rating period pursuant to subdivision (e). (5)  Once the department determines the add-on increase for a Medi-Cal managed care rating period, the add-on increase shall not be modified for that rating period unless the modification is required for purposes of receiving federal approval or claiming federal financial participation for the requirements of this section.
90 — 6 — Ch. 544

131701
(e)  (1)  A Medi-Cal managed care health plan shall satisfy its obligation under Section 438.114(c) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Re gulations for emergency medical transport, and shall pro vide payment to applicable noncontract emergency medical transport providers consistent with Section 1396u-2(b)(2)(D) of Title 42 of the United States Code. (2)  During the entirety of any Medi-Cal managed care rating period that this section is implemented, the amounts a noncontract eligible pro vider may collect if a Medi-Cal beneficiary recei ved medical assistance other than through enrollment in a Medi-Cal managed care health plan pursuant to Section 1396u-2(b)(2)(D) of Title 42 of the United States Code shall be the resulting Medi-Cal fee-for-service payment schedule amounts after the application of the add-on increase described in this section. During the Medi-Cal managed care rating period that the requirements of this section are implemented, any reimbursement to a noncontract emergency medical transport provider that is not an eligible provider shall be made in accordance with subdivision (b) of Section 14129.3.
(f)  The Medi-Cal reimb ursement pro vided by this section shall be distributed exclusively to eligible providers under a payment methodology based on emergency medical transport provided to Medi-Cal beneficiaries by eligible providers on a per-transport basis or other federally permissible basis.
(g)  During the entirety of any Medi-Cal managed care rating period that this section is implemented, in whole or in part, the department shall provide appropriate funding to each applicable Medi-Cal managed care plan to account for the add-on increase oblig ations of these plans pursuant to this section in federally appro ved risk based capitation rates de veloped in accordance with Section 14301.1.
(h)  (1)  For any Medi-Cal managed care rating period that this section is implemented, the nonfederal share, which is associated with the add-on increase as it applies to the Medi-Cal fee-for-service payment schedule and the portion of the risk-based capitation rate to Medi-Cal managed care health plans, may consist of voluntary intergovernmental transfers of funds provided by eligible providers and their affiliated governmental entities or other public entities pursuant to Section 14164, as applicable. Upon pro viding an y intergovernmental transfer of funds, each transferring entity shall certify , in the form and manner specified by the department, that the transferred funds qualify for federal financial participation pursuant to applicable laws relating to the federal Medicaid program. Any intergovernmental transfer of funds made pursuant to this section shall be v oluntary for purposes of federal law.
(2)  The department shall assess a 10-percent fee on each transfer of public funds to the state pursuant to this subdivision to pay for health care coverage and to reimburse the department for its costs associated with administering the program. Excluding this fee, the department shall not assess a percentage fee in connection with any intergovernmental transfer of funds made pursuant to this subdivision.
90 Ch. 544 — 7 —

132702
(3)  The department shall de velop and maintain, in consultation with participating eligible pro viders, a protocol and schedule for funding the nonfederal share of e xpenditures during a Medi-Cal managed care rating period that this section is implemented using v oluntary intergovernmental transfers.
(4)  This section does not limit or otherwise alter an y existing authority of the department to accept inter governmental transfers for purposes of funding the nonfederal share of expenditures in the Medi-Cal program. (i)  During the entirety of any Medi-Cal managed care rating period for which this section is implemented, in whole or in part, an eligible provider shall be exempt from the quality assurance fee and add-on increase pursuant to Article 3.91 (commencing with Section 14129).
(j)  This section shall cease to be operative on the first day of the Medi-Cal managed care rating period be ginning on or after the date the department determines, after consultation with participating eligible pro viders, that implementation of this section is no longer financially and programmatically supportive of the Medi-Cal program. The department shall mak e this determination if the projected amount of nonfederal share funds a vailable for an applicable Medi-Cal managed care rating period is insufficient to support implementation of this section in the subject Medi-Cal managed care rating period. The department shall post notice of the determination on its internet website.
(k)  The director may modify an y process or methodology specified in this section to the e xtent necessary to comply with state or federal la w or regulations, or to secure or maintain federal appro val or federal financial participation. If the director determines, after consulting with participating eligible providers, that a modification to the process or methodology is necessary, the director shall e xecute a declaration stating that this determination has been made and describing the modification. The director shall retain the declaration and provide a copy, within five working days of the e xecution of the declaration, to the fiscal and appropriate polic y committees of the Legislature. The director shall post the declaration on the department’s internet website.
(l)  Notwithstanding Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, the department may implement, interpret, or make specific this section, in whole or in part, by means of all-county letters, provider bulletins, plan letters, or other similar instructions without taking regulatory action.
(m)  (1)  The department shall implement this section only to the e xtent that federal financial participation is a vailable and an y necessary federal approvals are obtained.
(2)  The department shall promptly seek any necessary federal approvals for the implementation of this section for an applicable Medi-Cal managed care rating period.

SEC. 3. Section 14129 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:
14129. For purposes of this article, the following definitions apply:
90 — 8 — Ch. 544

133703
(a)  “Annual quality assurance fee rate” means the quality assurance fee assessed on each emergency medical transport during each applicable state fiscal year.
(b)  “Aggregate fee schedule amount” means the product of the fee-for-service add-on increase described in Section 14129.3 and the Medi-Cal emer gency medical transports, including both fee-for -service transports paid by the department and managed care transports paid by Medi-Cal managed care health plans, utilizing the billing codes for emergency medical transport for the state fiscal year.
(c)  “Available fee amount” shall be calculated as the sum of the following:
(1)  The amount deposited in the Medi-Cal Emergency Medical Transport Fund established under Section 14129.2 during the applicable state fiscal year, less the amounts described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (f) of Section 14129.2.
(2)  Any federal financial participation obtained as a result of the deposit of the amount described in paragraph (1) in the Medi-Cal Emer gency Medical Transport Fund, created pursuant to Section 14129.2, for the applicable state fiscal year.
(d)  “Department” means the State Department of Health Care Services. (e)  “Director” means the Director of Health Care Services. (f)  “Effective state medical assistance percentage” means a ratio of the aggregate expenditures from state-only sources for the Medi-Cal program divided by the aggre gate expenditures from state and federal sources for the Medi-Cal program for a state fiscal year.
(g)  “Emergency medical transport” means the act of transporting an individual from any point of origin to the nearest medical f acility capable of meeting the emer gency medical needs of the patient by an emer gency medical transport provider by means of an amb ulance licensed, operated, and equipped in accordance with applicable state or local statutes, ordinances, or re gulations that are billed with billing codes A0429 BLS Emergency, A0427 ALS Emer gency, A0434 Specialty Care Transport, A0225 Neonatal Emer gency Transport, and A0433 ALS2, and an y equivalent, predecessor, or successor billing codes as may be determined by the director. “Emergency medical transport” excludes transportation of beneficiaries by passenger car, taxicabs, litter vans, wheelchair vans, other forms of public or pri vate con veyances, and transportation by an air ambulance pro vider. An “emer gency medical transport” does not occur when, following evaluation of a patient, a transport is not provided. (h)  “Gross receipts” means gross payments recei ved as patient care revenue for emergency medical transports, determined on a cash basis of accounting. “Gross receipts” includes all payments received as patient care revenue for emergency medical transports, including payments for billing codes A0429 BLS Emergency, A0427 ALS Emergency, and A0433 ALS2, and an y equi valent, predecessor , or successor billing codes as may be determined by the director, and any other ancillary billing codes associated with emergency medical transport as may be determined by the director . 90 Ch. 544 — 9 —

134704
“Gross receipts” e xcludes supplemental amounts recei ved pursuant to Sections 14105.94 or 14105.945.
(i)  “Emergency medical transport pro vider” means an y pro vider of emergency medical transports, e xcept that during an y Medi-Cal managed care rating period for which Section 14105.945 is implemented “emergency medical transport provider” shall exclude “eligible providers” as defined in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 14105.945 for purposes of this article.
(j)  “Emergency medical transport provider subject to the fee” means all emergency medical transport pro viders who bill and recei ve patient care revenue from the pro vision of emer gency medical transports, e xcept emergency medical transport pro viders that are e xempt pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 14129.6.
(k)  “Medi-Cal managed care health plan” means a “managed health care plan” as that term is defined in subdivision (ab) of Section 14169.51.

SEC. 4. Section 14129.3 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:
14129.3. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (i) of Section 14105.945, commencing July 1, 2018, and for each state fiscal year thereafter for which this article is operati ve, reimb ursement to emer gency medical transport providers for emergency medical transports shall be increased by application of an add-on to the associated Medi-Cal fee-for-service payment schedule.

The add-on increase to the fee-for -service payment schedule under this section shall be calculated on or before June 15, 2018, and shall remain the same for later state fiscal years for which this article is operati ve, to the extent the department determines federal financial participation is available and is not otherwise jeopardized. The add-on increase to the fee-for-service payment schedule under this section shall apply only to those billing codes identified in, or any equivalent, predecessor, or successor billing codes as may be determined by the director pursuant to, subdi vision (g) of Section 14129. The department shall calculate the projections required by this subdivision based on the data submitted pursuant to Section 14129.1. The fee-for-service add-on shall be equal to the quotient of the a vailable fee amount projected by the department on or before June 15, 2018, for the 2018–19 state fiscal year, divided by the total Medi-Cal emergency medical transports, including both fee-for-service transports paid by the department and managed care transports paid by Medi-Cal managed care health plans, utilizing these billing codes projected by the department on or before June 15, 2018, for the 2018–19 state fiscal year . The resulting fee-for -service payment schedule amounts after the application of this section shall be equal to the sum of the Medi-Cal fee-for -service payment schedule amount for the 2015–16 state fiscal year and the add-on increase.
(b) (1) Each applicable Medi-Cal managed care health plan shall satisfy its obligation under Section 438.114(c) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations for emergency medical transports and shall pro vide payment to noncontract emergency medical transport providers consistent with Section 1396u-2(b)(2)(D) of Title 42 of the United States Code. Ef fective July 1, 90 — 10 — Ch. 544

135705
2018, and for each state fiscal year thereafter for which this article is operative, the amounts a noncontract emergency medical transport provider could collect if the beneficiary received medical assistance other than through enrollment in a Medi-Cal managed care health plan pursuant to Section 1396u-2(b)(2)(D) of Title 42 of the United States Code shall be the resulting fee-for-service payment schedule amounts after the application of this section.
(2)  This subdivision shall not apply to an eligible pro vider, as defined in paragraph (1) of subdi vision (a) of Section 14105.945, who pro vides noncontract emergency medical transports to an enrollee of a Medi-Cal managed care plan during an y Medi-Cal managed care rating period that Section 14105.945 is implemented.
(c)  The increased payments required by this section shall be funded solely from the following:
(1)  The quality assurance fee set forth in Section 14129.2, along with any interest or other investment income earned on those funds. (2)  Federal reimbursement and any other related federal funds. (d)  The proceeds of the quality assurance fee set forth in Section 14129.2, the matching amount provided by the federal government, and any interest earned on those proceeds shall be used to supplement existing funding for emergency medical transports pro vided by emer gency medical transport providers and not to supplant this funding.
(e)  Notwithstanding this article, the department may seek federal approval to implement any add-on increase to the fee-for-service payment schedule pursuant to this section for any state fiscal year or years, as applicable, on a time-limited basis for a fix ed program period, as determined by the department.
(f)  Notwithstanding this article, the add-on increase to the fee-for-service payment schedule pursuant to this section shall only be required and payable for state fiscal years that a quality assurance fee payment obligation exists for emergency medical transport providers.

O
90 Ch. 544 — 11 —

136706
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.6. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0702
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Christopher Cash, Public Works Director

1. SUBJECT
Approval of the submittal of a project funding application to Orange County Transportation Authority for competitive Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program. Resolution No. 11590.

2. SUMMARY
Adoption of Resolution No. 11590 will enable Orange County Transportation Authority to allocate funds from the Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs in the amounts specified in the City’s project application.

3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Resolution No. 11590. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange approving the submittal of improvement projects to the Orange County Transportation Authority for funding under the competitive Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program.

4. FISCAL IMPACT
None. If nominated project is selected by Orange County Transportation Authority for award, a future budget transfer and/or appropriation will be requested. Based on current fund balances, the local match would not require use of any General Fund dollars.

5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Provide for a safe community
b: Provide and maintain infrastructure necessary to ensure the safety of the public.

Goal 4: Provide outstanding public service
b: Provide facilities and services to meet customer expectations.

6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
In June 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11468 to approve the City’sLocal Signal Synchronization Plan (LSSP) as part of the Measure M2 Eligibility Process. The LSSP identifies traffic signal synchronization routes including all elements of the Regional (countywide) Signal Synchronization Network located within the City. The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) issued a call for projects for Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) to coordinate traffic signals across jurisdictional boundaries in the county. The City of Orange is coordinating with neighboring agencies on the project funding application as follows:
· State College Boulevard/The City Drive RTSSP Corridor between State CollegeCity of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™
137
Item #: 3.6. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0702
· State College Boulevard/The City Drive RTSSP Corridor between State College Boulevard/Cliffwood Avenue in the City of Brea and The City Drive/Garden Grove Boulevard in the City of Orange. The project is a collaboration with the City of Brea, City of Fullerton, City of Anaheim, City of Orange, and the State of California Department of Transportation. This project will be led and implemented by the City of Anaheim.

In addition to coordinating signal timing the RTSSP project allows agencies to implement traffic signal and communications equipment improvements along the corridor. For the nominated corridor, if selected for funding, the City of Orange will modernize existing traffic signal technology at various signals. Some of these improvements will include new traffic signal controllers and cabinets, signal communication equipment, and vehicle detection. These improvements will help ensure the signals along the corridor can facilitate and operate with optimized synchronized timing.

If awarded, OCTA will provide 80% funding for improvements and upgrades to traffic signal infrastructure that otherwise would have to be funded entirely by the City. It should be noted that the City of Orange would be a participating agency on this project. The lead agency (Anaheim) will procure consultant services and manage construction of improvements on behalf of the City of Orange. While Orange staff would be expected to spend some time coordinating and reviewing proposed signal timing and improvements, the staff time commitment for a participating agency is far less than that of the lead agency.

Nominated projects selected for funding will receive up to 80% of Measure M2 funding for eligible project expenses. The participating agencies are required to provide a minimum of 20% matching funds for these projects. If the nominated project is selected by OCTA for award, a future budget transfer and/or appropriation will be requested.

The estimated project cost for timing and improvements within the City of Orange is $928,106.00, of which $185,621.20 is the anticipated local match. Based on current fund balances, the local match would not require use of any General Fund dollars.

By adopting Resolution No.11590 the City Council requests OCTA allocate the funds necessary for the implementation of the Regional Traffic Synchronization Program within each local agency’s jurisdiction. The Resolution will also authorize the Director of Public Works to submit synchronization projects for funding consideration under the Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs.

7. ATTACHMENTS
· Attachment 1 Resolution No. 11590
· Attachment 2 Map of State College Boulevard/The City Drive RTSSP Corridor City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
138
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.6. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0702
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Christopher Cash, Public Works Director

5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Provide for a safe community
b: Provide and maintain infrastructure necessary to ensure the safety of the public.

Goal 4: Provide outstanding public service
b: Provide facilities and services to meet customer expectations.

6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
In June 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11468 to approve the City’sLocal Signal Synchronization Plan (LSSP) as part of the Measure M2 Eligibility Process. The LSSP identifies traffic signal synchronization routes including all elements of the Regional (countywide) Signal Synchronization Network located within the City. The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) issued a call for projects for Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) to coordinate traffic signals across jurisdictional boundaries in the county. The City of Orange is coordinating with neighboring agencies on the project funding application as follows:
· State College Boulevard/The City Drive RTSSP Corridor between State CollegeCity of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™
139
Item #: 3.6. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0702
· State College Boulevard/The City Drive RTSSP Corridor between State College Boulevard/Cliffwood Avenue in the City of Brea and The City Drive/Garden Grove Boulevard in the City of Orange. The project is a collaboration with the City of Brea, City of Fullerton, City of Anaheim, City of Orange, and the State of California Department of Transportation. This project will be led and implemented by the City of Anaheim.

RESOLUTION NO. 11590

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF ORANGE APPROVING

THE SUBMITTAL OF IMPROVEMENT

PROJECTS TO THE ORANGE COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR

FUNDING UNDER THE COMPETITIVE
MEASURE M2 REGIONAL TRAFFIC
SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROGRAM.

WHEREAS, the Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program targets over 2,000 signalized intersections across Orange County to maintain traffic signal synchronization, improve traffic flow, and reduce congestion across jurisdictions; and

WHEREAS, the City of Orange has been declared by the Orange County Transportation Authority to meet the eligibility requirements to receive revenues as part of Measure M2; and

WHEREAS, the City of Orange must include all projects funded by Net Revenues in the seven-year Capital Improvement Program as part of the Renewed Measure M Ordinance eligibility requirement; and

WHEREAS, the City of Orange authorizes a formal amendment to the seven -year Capital Improvement Program to add projects approved for funding upon approval from the Orange County Transportation Authority Board of Directors, if necessary; and

WHEREAS, the City of Orange has currently adopted a Local Signal Synchronization Plan consistent with the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan as a key component of local agencies’ efforts to synchronizing traffic signals across local agencies’ boundaries; and

WHEREAS, the City of Orange will provide matching funds for each project as required by the Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs Procedures Manual; and

WHEREAS, the City of Orange will not use Renewed Measure M funds to supplant Developer Fees or other commitments; and

WHEREAS, the City of Orange desires to implement multi -jurisdictional signal synchronization listed below; and

WHEREAS, the City Council delegates signature authority to the Public Works Director or his designee to facilitate delivery of the project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED , the City Council of the City of Orange hereby requests the Orange County Transportation Authority allocate funds in the amounts 141
2 specified in the City’s application to said City from the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program. Said funds, if approved, shall be matched by funds from said City as required and shall be used as supplemental funding to aid the City in signal synchronization along the State College Boulevard/The City Drive Corridor.

ADOPTED this ____ day of ____________________, 2025

Daniel R. Slater, Mayor, City of Orange

ATTEST:

Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney, City of Orange

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF ORANGE )

CITY OF ORANGE )

I, PAMELA COLEMAN, City Clerk of the City of Orange, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Orange at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 202 5 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
142
City of Brea
City of Fullerton
City of Anaheim
City of Orange
Caltrans

SEE ABOVE RIGHT

SEE NEXT PAGE

TOP LEFT

SEE BELOW LEFT
State College Blvd
City of Brea
City of Fullerton
City of Fullerton
State College Blvd
State College Blvd

Page 1 of 2 ends

Map of State College Blvd/The City Drive RTSSP Corridor 143

SEE PREVIOUS PAGE BOTTOM RIGHT

SEE BELOW LEFT

SEE ABOVE RIGHT
State College Blvd
City of Anaheim
City of Anaheim
State College Blvd
The City Drive
City of Orange
W. Chapman Ave
W. Garden Grove Blvd

Page 2 of 2 ends

144
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.7. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0704
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Christopher Cash, Public Works Director

1. SUBJECT
Authorization for the Director of Public Works to sign and file a financial assistance application for a financing agreement with the California State Water Resources Control Board for the City of Orange Wells 25 and 27 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances Treatment Systems. Resolution No. 11591.

2. SUMMARY
In 2019, the Orange County Water District, who manages the groundwater basins of north and central Orange County, conducted a study to address treatment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances as required by the California State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water. Water quality sampling of City of Orange wells indicated elevated levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances with concentrations exceeding the Division of Drinking Water’sResponse Levels at nine wells which require treatment systems. The design and construction of these treatment systems is being fully funded by the Orange County Water District. To date, four treatment systems have been completed, and the wells have been put back into operation. Adoption of Resolution No. 11591 is necessary to support Orange County Water District’seffort in applying for available grants for the construction of the treatment systems at Wells 25 and 27.

3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Resolution No. 11591. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange authorizing a representative to sign and file a financial assistance application for a financing and grant agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board for City of Orange Wells 25 and 27 PFAS Treatment Plant.

4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.

5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Provide for a safe community
b: Provide and maintain infrastructure necessary to ensure the safety of the public.

Goal 4: Provide outstanding public service
b: Provide facilities and services to meet customer expectations.

6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
Under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), $5 billion has been set aside through the Drinking City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
145
Item #: 3.7. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0704
Under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), $5 billion has been set aside through the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Program administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to reduce people’sexposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and other emerging contaminants (EC). The SWRCB will provide one hundred percent as principal forgiveness (i.e., a Federal grant) and up to $5,000,000 for each qualified applicant. Eligible projects include the construction of a new treatment facility that addresses EC/PFAS such as the City of Orange Wells 25 and 27 PFAS Treatment Systems Project. OCWD is not considered as a qualified applicant for the PFAS grant because OCWD does not own nor operate any PFAS-contaminated wells in its service area. Therefore, OCWD is requesting assistance from the City of Orange to apply for the PFAS grant.

Per the PFAS Treatment Facilities and Program Agreement, OCWD has financed, in its entirety, the technical feasibility study, design, and construction of the City of Orange Wells 25 and 27 PFAS Treatment Systems Project which is scheduled to be completed in 2026. The total project budget is approximately $12,000,000, with construction costing $7,600,000. Also, per the Agreement, the City of Orange is to support and assist OCWD in the pursuit of any PFAS grants that may be used to fund the project construction. Receiving this grant would minimize future replenishment assessment (i.e., groundwater fees) increases from OCWD, fees which are passed through to the customer in the City of Orange’s water rates.

If the PFAS grant funding agreement were executed, the City would be the recipient of grant funds as the owner and the operator of the PFAS water treatment systems. OCWD would submit invoice(s) to the City of Orange totaling to the grant amount. The City of Orange would need to pay OCWD as “proofof payment”before seeking and receiving grant reimbursement from the SWRCB. The City of Orange would serve as a “pass-through”agency between SWRCB and OCWD, and the net financial impact to the City of Orange would be zero.

The City’sadoption of an Authorization Resolution is a requirement of the PFAS grant application and is needed in order to execute a grant funding agreement with the SWRCB.

7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. 11591
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
146
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.7. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0704
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Christopher Cash, Public Works Director

4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.

5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Provide for a safe community
b: Provide and maintain infrastructure necessary to ensure the safety of the public.

Goal 4: Provide outstanding public service
b: Provide facilities and services to meet customer expectations.

6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
Under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), $5 billion has been set aside through the Drinking City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
147
Item #: 3.7. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0704
Under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), $5 billion has been set aside through the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Program administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to reduce people’sexposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and other emerging contaminants (EC). The SWRCB will provide one hundred percent as principal forgiveness (i.e., a Federal grant) and up to $5,000,000 for each qualified applicant. Eligible projects include the construction of a new treatment facility that addresses EC/PFAS such as the City of Orange Wells 25 and 27 PFAS Treatment Systems Project. OCWD is not considered as a qualified applicant for the PFAS grant because OCWD does not own nor operate any PFAS-contaminated wells in its service area. Therefore, OCWD is requesting assistance from the City of Orange to apply for the PFAS grant.

The City’sadoption of an Authorization Resolution is a requirement of the PFAS grant application and is needed in order to execute a grant funding agreement with the SWRCB.

7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. 11591
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
148
RESOLUTION NO. 11591

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF ORANGE AUTHORIZING A

REPRESENTATIVE TO SIGN AND FILE A

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE APPLICATION FOR

A FINANCING AND GRANT AGREEMENT

WITH THE STATE WATER RESOURCES

CONTROL BOARD FOR CITY OF ORANGE
WELLS 25 AND 27 PFAS TREATMENT PLANT

WHEREAS, the City of Orange (the “City”) is a municipal corporation which exercises governmental functions and powers and is organized and existing under the laws of the State of California; and

WHEREAS, the Orange County Water District (OCWD), who manages the groundwater basins of north and central Orange County, conducted a study to address treatment of per - and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as required by the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Division of Drinking Water (DDW); and

WHEREAS, water quality sampling of City wells indicated elevated levels of PFAS species with concentrations exceeding the DDW’s Response Levels for PFAS at seven wells and exceeding the Federal Maximum Contaminant Level at four wells which require treatment for PFAS removal. To date, four PFAS treatment systems have been completed, and the wells have been put back into operation; and

WHEREAS, the design and construction of PFAS treatment system facilities is being fully funded by the OCWD who is not considered as a qualified applicant for the PFAS grant as it does not own and operate any PFAS-contaminated wells in its service area. Therefore, OCWD is requesting assistance from the City to apply for a PFAS grant; and

WHEREAS, adoption of Resolution Number is necessary to support OCWD’s effort in applying for available grants for the construction of a PFAS treatment plant at City Wells 25 and

27. WHEREAS, the City would be the recipient of any awarded grant funds and act in its capacity as a pass -through agency between the State Water Resources Control Board and the Orange County Water District for grant funds awarded to the City to offset costs associated with the design and construction of the City of Orange Wells 25 and 27 PFAS Treatment Systems.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orange resolves, finds and determines, on the basis of the facts set forth in the agenda report presented to it, as follows:

149
2 1. The City Manager (the “Authorized Representative”) or designee, is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of the City, a Financial Assistance Application for a financing and grant agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board for the planning, design, and construction of the City of Orange Wells 25 and 27 PFAS Treatment Plant.

2. The Authorized Representative, or designee, is designated to provide the assurances, certifications, and commitments required for the financial assistance application, including but not limited to executing a financial assistance agreement from the State Water Resources Control Board and any amendments or changes thereto.

3. The Authorized Representative, or designee, is designated to represent the City in carrying out the City's responsibilities under the financing agreement, including certifying disbursement requests on behalf of the City and compliance with applicable state and federal laws.

ADOPTED this ____ day of ____________________, 2025

Daniel R. Slater, Mayor, City of Orange

ATTEST:

Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney, City of Orange

150
3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF ORANGE )

CITY OF ORANGE )

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange

151
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.8. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0005
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Sean deMetropolis, Fire Chief

1. SUBJECT
Authorization for designated City personnel to execute documents for federal financial assistance for the Department of Homeland Security’sEmergency Management Performance Grant program for Fiscal Years 2023, 2024, and 2025. Resolution No. 11592.

2. SUMMARY
Adoption of proposed Resolution No. 11592 authorizes designated city officials to take necessary actions to secure and manage federal financial assistance from the Department of Homeland Security's Emergency Management Performance Grant program for Fiscal Year 2023-2025. This expedites the receipt of grant funds crucial for the City’sEmergency Management Program including but not limited to, Emergency Operations Center supplies, emergency food, sheltering equipment, and more.

3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Resolution No.11592. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange authorizing the execution of documents for federal financial assistance for the emergency management performance grant program for Fiscal Year 2023, Fiscal Year 2024, and Fiscal Year 2025.

4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.

5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Maintain Strong Emergency and Safety Services
a: Improve Emergency Response Infrastructure.

6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
The City of Orange has been awarded funding through the State of California from the Department of Homeland Security's Emergency Management Performance Grant program for Fiscal Years 2023, 2024, and 2025. To efficiently access and administer these funds, a Governing Body Resolution (GRB) is required to authorize specific city officials to undertake necessary actions, including the signing of grant agreements and related documents. The attached GBR titles, Fire Chief, Police Chief, and Assistant City Manager, as individuals empowered to execute these actions on behalf of the City. Securing this grant funding is vital for achieving the Strategic Goals and enhancing the City’s City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
152
Item #: 3.8. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0005
the City. Securing this grant funding is vital for achieving the Strategic Goals and enhancing the City’s preparedness and response. Delay in signing the resolution may jeopardize the timely receipt of these crucial funds.

7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. 11592
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
153
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.8. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0005
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Sean deMetropolis, Fire Chief

4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.

5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Maintain Strong Emergency and Safety Services
a: Improve Emergency Response Infrastructure.

6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
The City of Orange has been awarded funding through the State of California from the Department of Homeland Security's Emergency Management Performance Grant program for Fiscal Years 2023, 2024, and 2025. To efficiently access and administer these funds, a Governing Body Resolution (GRB) is required to authorize specific city officials to undertake necessary actions, including the signing of grant agreements and related documents. The attached GBR titles, Fire Chief, Police Chief, and Assistant City Manager, as individuals empowered to execute these actions on behalf of the City. Securing this grant funding is vital for achieving the Strategic Goals and enhancing the City’s City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
154
Item #: 3.8. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0005
the City. Securing this grant funding is vital for achieving the Strategic Goals and enhancing the City’s preparedness and response. Delay in signing the resolution may jeopardize the timely receipt of these crucial funds.

7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. 11592
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
155
RESOLUTION NO. 11592

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF ORANGE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION

OF DOCUMENTS FOR FEDERAL FINANCIAL

ASSISTANCE FOR THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

PERFORMANCE GRANT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2023, FISCAL YEAR 2024, AND FISCAL YEAR
2025.

WHEREAS, the City of Orange has applied for federal financial assistance through the Department of Homeland Security's Emergency Management Performance Grant program for Fiscal Years (FY) 2023, 2024, and 2025; and

WHEREAS, the grant application requires authorization for designated City personnel to execute documents and take actions necessary to secure and manage the grant funds; and

WHEREAS, the City Council desires to ensure proper and lawful administration of the grant funds.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orange hereby approves:

1. The authorization of the Fire Chief to execute all necessary documents and undertake all actions required to obtain and administer the E mergency Management Performance Grant funds for FY 2023, FY 2024, and FY 2025. This includes but is not limited to signing agreements, certifications, and other documents as required by the granting agency.

2. The City Manager or designee is authorized to take any and all actions necessary to implement this resolution.

ADOPTED this day of , 2025

Daniel R. Slater, Mayor, City of Orange

ATTEST:

Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange

156
2 APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney, City of Orange

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF ORANGE )

CITY OF ORANGE )

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
157
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.9. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0690
TO: Members of the City Council
FROM: Mayor Dan Slater

1. SUBJECT
Appointment of City Councilmembers to Regional Boards and Committees.

2. SUMMARY
There are no recommended changes to current Councilmember appointments to regional boards and committees. A list of current appointments is attached. All terms are for one year unless otherwise noted. Pursuant to FPPC Regulation 18702.5, Form 806 has been posted on the City’s website.

3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Confirm City Councilmember appointments to regional boards and committees as listed on the attachment.

4. ATTACHMENT
· Current Councilmember appointments to City Regional Boards and Committees City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
158
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.9. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0690
TO: Members of the City Council
FROM: Mayor Dan Slater

1. SUBJECT
Appointment of City Councilmembers to Regional Boards and Committees.

3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Confirm City Councilmember appointments to regional boards and committees as listed on the attachment.

4. ATTACHMENT
· Current Councilmember appointments to City Regional Boards and Committees City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
159

CURRENT
Council Appointments to City Committees and Regional Boards (Terms are for 1 year unless otherwise noted.)
BOARD/COMMITTEE/COMMISSION Term Member Alternate
Orange City/Schools Coordinating
Committee
1 year Gutierrez Tavoularis
Foothill Eastern TCA (Tollroad)** 1 year Bilodeau Tavoularis North Net Fire Training (Joint Powers
Authority)
1 year Dumitru Tavoularis
Orange County Transportation Authority
(OCTA)
2 years
Term expires
12/31/2026
Dumitru (appointed by
City Selection
Committee)
N/A
Orange County Sanitation District** 2 years
Term expires
1/13/2025
Dumitru Gyllenhammer
Orange County Mosquito and Vector
Control**
2 years
Term expires
1/5/2026*
Dumitru N/A
Orange County Waste Management
Commission
3 years
Term expires
5/31/25
Barrios (appointed by
City Selection
Committee)
N/A
Orange Elderly Services (Senior Center) 1 year Tavoularis Gutierrez Santa Ana Flood Protection Agency 1 year Bilodeau Gutierrez *2-year term re-appointed on 11/14/23
**Members receive stipend and are listed on the City’s Form 806 OCTA term is 1/1/2025-12/31/2026
160
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.10. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0003
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Trang Nguyen, Finance Director

1. SUBJECT
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the fiscal period covering July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026. Resolution No. SAORA-038.

2. SUMMARY
Approve the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) 25-65 and related Administrative Budgets for the period covering July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026, and authorize the transmittal of ROPS 25-26 to the Orange Countywide Oversight Board.

3. RECOMMENDED ACTION

2. Direct staff to transmit ROPS 25-26 and related Administrative Budgets to the Orange Countywide Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to the Orange Redevelopment Agency.

4. FISCAL IMPACT
The preparation and submittal of the ROPS 25-26 allows the Successor Agency to pay its enforceable obligations for the period from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. Items listed on the ROPS 25-26 will be included in the City’sFY 25-26 Annual Budget. The ROPS 25-26 shall become operative after it is approved by the Orange Countywide Oversight Board and the State of California Department of Finance.

5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 2: Be a fiscally healthy community
a: Expend fiscal resources responsibly.

6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
With the dissolution of the Orange Redevelopment Agency (Agency) effective January 31, 2012, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 10625 authorizing the City to become the Successor Agency for the former redevelopment agency and enabling the City to fulfil the continued expenses of the Agency. A significant majority of Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) expenses are outstanding Agency bonds that are scheduled to be paid twice a year until they mature in the years City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
161
Item #: 3.10. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0003
ranging from 2023 - 2036.

Assembly Bill 113 (AB 113) provided additional amendments to obligations and deadlines for redevelopment wind-down activities, including specific language in Health and Safety Code (HSC) Section 34177(o)(1) with regard to preparation and approval of Annual ROPS covering the period of July 1 to June 30. The Annual ROPS lists all legally binding and enforceable agreements or contracts of the former Orange Redevelopment Agency (Agency) for each fiscal-year period, including those necessary for the continued administration of the Successor Agency to wind down the former Agency.

The State Department of Finance (DOF) requires submission of the Annual ROPS through the web- based application called the Redevelopment Agency Dissolution Web Application (RAD), first established in 2013. This Annual ROPS covers the period July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026 (ROPS 25- 26). It is comprised of the following four forms:
1) Summary Report: This form summarizes funding totals carried forward from the ROPS Detail Form by funding source and reports the Current Period Funding for Enforceable Obligations of ROPS 25-26A and 25-26B in separate columns; 2) ROPS Detail Form: This form lists the Agency outstanding obligations, debts, and payments due for ROPS A and B separately by fund source; 3) Report of Cash Balances Form: This form requires the Successor Agency to report all cash balances for each funding source in accordance with HSC section 34177(l), and; 4) Notes Form: The completion of this form is optional and available to Successor Agency to provide additional information associated with the ROPS Detail Form.

Overview of ROPS 25-26
Following the RAD process for ROPS 25-26, the estimated Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) to be disbursed is $2,339,450 subject to approval of the Orange Countywide Oversight Board and the DOF.

Proposed
ROPS 25-26
Amount
Requested
Administrative
Budget
Estimated RPTTF Disbursement
Amount
Other Funds $2,288,020 $0 $2,288,020
RPTTF $0 $51,430 $51,430
TOTAL $2,288,020 $51,430 $2,339,450
Along with preparing the Annual ROPS, the Successor Agency is required to prepare administrative budgets for the six-month fiscal periods from July 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025 and from January 1, 2026 through June 30, 2026. The proposed Administrative Budgets shall include estimated amounts for Successor Agency administrative costs that are to be paid from property tax revenues deposited in the RPTTF.

Deadline to submit ROPS 25-26
To comply with AB 113 and the upcoming February 1, 2025 deadline, it is recommended the Successor Agency approve ROPS 25-26 and the related Administrative Budget and transmit these documents to the Orange Countywide Oversight Board for approval. The DOF has indicated late ROPS submission will be subject to penalties set forth in Health and Safety Code 34177(o)(1). The penalty affects the entity that created the redevelopment agency which is subject to a penalty in an amount equal to $10,000 per day for every day the ROPS is not submitted to the DOF.

City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
162
Item #: 3.10. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0003

7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. SAORA-038
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
163
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 3.10. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0003
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Trang Nguyen, Finance Director

1. SUBJECT
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the fiscal period covering July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026. Resolution No. SAORA-038.

3. RECOMMENDED ACTION

2. Direct staff to transmit ROPS 25-26 and related Administrative Budgets to the Orange Countywide Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to the Orange Redevelopment Agency.

5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 2: Be a fiscally healthy community
a: Expend fiscal resources responsibly.

6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
With the dissolution of the Orange Redevelopment Agency (Agency) effective January 31, 2012, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 10625 authorizing the City to become the Successor Agency for the former redevelopment agency and enabling the City to fulfil the continued expenses of the Agency. A significant majority of Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) expenses are outstanding Agency bonds that are scheduled to be paid twice a year until they mature in the years City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
164
Item #: 3.10. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0003
ranging from 2023 - 2036.

City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
165
Item #: 3.10. 1/14/2025 File #: 25-0003

7. ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. SAORA-038
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
166
RESOLUTION NO. SAORA-038

A RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE ORANGE REDEVELOPMENT

AGENCY APPROVING A RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION

PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE FISCAL PERIOD FROM
JULY 1, 2025, THROUGH JUNE 30, 20 26, PURSUANT TO
HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34177 AND TAKING

CERTAIN RELATED ACTIONS

WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(o), the Successor Agency to the Orange Redevelopment Agency (the Successor Agency) must prepare a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule listing the anticipated payments for enforceable obligations to be made by the Successor Agency during the fiscal period from July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026 (ROPS 25-26) and submit ROPS 25-26 to the oversight board of the Successor Agency (the Oversight Board) for approval; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(1)(2)(B), at the same time that the Successor Agency submits ROPS 25-26 to the Oversight Board for approval, the Successor Agency must submit a copy of such ROPS 25-26 to the State Department of Finance (the DOF), the County administrative officer, and the County Auditor-Controller; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(1)(2) and Section 34177 (o)(1), the Successor Agency must: (i) submit the Oversight Board -approved ROPS 25-26 to the DOF, the Office of the State Controller, and the County Auditor-Controller no later than February 1, 20 25, and (ii) post a copy of the Oversight Board -approved ROPS 25-26 on the Successor Agency’s website;

NOW THEREFORE, the Governing Board of the Successor Agency to the Orange Redevelopment Agency does hereby find, determine, resolve, and order as follows:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution.

Section 2. ROPS 25-26, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A , is hereby approved. The Executive Director of the Successor Agency, in consultation with the Successor Agency’s legal counsel, may modify ROPS 25-26 as the Executive Director or the Successor Agency’s legal counsel deems necessary or advisable.

Section 3. Staff is hereby authorized and directed to submit a copy of ROPS 25-26 to the Oversight Board for approval and, at the same time, transmit a copy of ROPS 25-26 to the DOF, the County Auditor -Controller and the County administrative officer as designated by the County.

167
2 Section 4. Staff is hereby authorized and directed to submit a copy of Oversight Board- approved ROPS 23-24 to the DOF, the Office of the State Controller, and the County Auditor - Controller. If the Oversight Board has not approved ROPS 23-24 by February 1, 2025, Staff is hereby authorized and directed to transmit ROPS 25-26 to the DOF, the Office of the State Controller, and the County Auditor -Controller by February 1, 2025, with a written notification regarding the status of the Oversight Board’s review. Written notice and information regarding the action of the Oversight Board shall be provided to the DOF by electronic means and in a manner of DOF’s choosing.

Section 5. Staff is hereby authorized and directed to post a copy of the Oversight Board-approved ROPS 25-26 on the Successor Agency’s Internet website (being a page on the Internet website of the City of Orange).

Section 6. The officers and other Staff members of the Successor Agency are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things which they may deem necessary or advisable to effectuate this Resolution, including but not limited to reques ting additional review by the DOF and an opportunity to meet and confer on any disputed ite ms, and making adjustments to ROPS 25-26 pursuant to the DOF’s instructions, and any such actions previously taken are hereby ratified and confirmed.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of January, 2025.

Daniel R. Slater
Chairperson of the Successor Agency

ATTEST:

Pamela Coleman
Clerk of the Successor Agency
to the Orange Redevelopment Agency

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Mike Vigliotta, Agency Attorney
Successor Agency
to the Orange Redevelopment Agency
168
3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF ORANGE )

CITY OF ORANGE )

I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by Governing Board of the Successor Agency to the Orange Redevelopment Agency at a regular meeting thereof held on the ____ day of January, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:

NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:

ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS:

______________________________________________
Pamela Coleman
Clerk of the Successor Agency
to the Orange Redevelopment Agency
169

EXHIBIT A

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE ORANGE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE
(July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2026)

170
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - Summary Filed for the July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 Period Successor Agency: Orange City
County: Orange
Current Period Requested Funding for Enforceable
Obligations (ROPS Detail)
25-26A Total
(July -
December)
25-26B Total
(January -
June)
ROPS 25-26
Total
A Enforceable Obligations Funded as Follows (B+C+D) $ 1,825,335 $ 462,685 $ 2,288,020 B Bond Proceeds - - -
C Reserve Balance - - -
D Other Funds 1,825,335 462,685 2,288,020
E Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) (F+G) $ 25,715 $ 25,715 $ 51,430

F RPTTF - - -
G Administrative RPTTF 25,715 25,715 51,430
H Current Period Enforceable Obligations (A+E) $ 1,851,050 $ 488,400 $ 2,339,450 Certification of Oversight Board Chairman:

Name Title
Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the Health and Safety
code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and
accurate Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for
the above named successor agency. /s/
Signature Date
171
Orange City
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - ROPS Detail July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
Item
# Project Name Obligation
Type
Agreement
Execution
Date
Agreement
Termination
Date
Payee Description Project
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
25-26
Total
ROPS 25-26A (Jul - Dec)
25-26A
Total
ROPS 25-26B (Jan - Jun)
25-26B
Total
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
$33,052,938 $2,339,450 $- $- $1,825,335 $- $25,715 $1,851,050 $- $- $462,685 $- $25,715 $488,400 4 2008 A&B
and 2014A
Bonds
Admin
Costs
05/22/
2012
09/01/2037 Richards,Watson
& Gershon
Bond
counsel
Orange
Merged
11,500 N $1,000 - - - - 500 $500 - - - - 500 $500
61 2008 Tax
Allocation
Bonds Series
B
Bonds
Issued
On or
Before
12/31/10
05/01/
2008
05/01/2038 US Bank To fund
Orange
Merged &
Amended
Orange
Merged
3,899,388 N $643,620 - - 605,335 - - $605,335 - - 38,285 - - $38,285 70 Successor
Agency
Administrative
Costs
Admin
Costs
08/16/
1983
07/05/2039 various Costs for
maintaining
Successor
Agency
operations
Orange
Merged
250,000 N $38,100 - - - - 19,050 $19,050 - - - - 19,050 $19,050 130 2018 Tax
Allocation
Refunding
Bonds Series
A
Bonds
Issued
After 12/
31/10
07/12/
2018
09/01/2036 US Bank 2018 Bond
Refunding
of the 2008
Tax
Allocation
Bonds,
Series A.

DOF
approved
Resolution
No.

OB-0078
that
authorized
the bond
refunding
and
issuance.
28,740,250 N $1,644,400 - - 1,220,000 - - $1,220,000 - - 424,400 - - $424,400 131 2008B &
2018A Bonds
Admin
Costs
06/01/
1997
09/01/2036 US Bank Fiscal
agent fees
80,400 N $7,850 - - - - 3,925 $3,925 - - - - 3,925 $3,925 132 2008B &
2018A Bonds
Admin
Costs
06/01/
1997
09/01/2036 Willdan Bonds
disclosure/
arbitrage
fees
71,400 N $4,480 - - - - 2,240 $2,240 - - - - 2,240 $2,240 172
Orange City
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - Report of Cash Balances July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023
(Report Amounts in Whole Dollars)
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177 (l), Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) may be listed as a source of payment on the ROPS, but only to the extent no other funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation.

A B C D E F G H
ROPS 22-23 Cash Balances
(07/01/22 - 06/30/23)
Fund Sources
Comments
Bond Proceeds Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF
Bonds issued
on or before
12/31/10
Bonds issued
on or after
01/01/11
Prior ROPS
RPTTF and
Reserve
Balances retained
for future
period(s)
Rent, grants,
interest, etc.

Non-Admin
and Admin

1 Beginning Available Cash Balance (Actual 07/01/22)
RPTTF amount should exclude "A" period distribution
amount.
4,300 1,922,500 953,154 144,490
2 Revenue/Income (Actual 06/30/23)
RPTTF amount should tie to the ROPS 22-23 total
distribution from the County Auditor-Controller
- 5,526,033
3 Expenditures for ROPS 22-23 Enforceable Obligations
(Actual 06/30/23)
1,618 5,659,947 6/30/2023 City repaid loan $3,417,360
4 Retention of Available Cash Balance (Actual 06/30/23) RPTTF amount retained should only include the amounts
distributed as reserve for future period(s)
1,922,500 - 8,958
5 ROPS 22-23 RPTTF Prior Period Adjustment
RPTTF amount should tie to the Agency's ROPS 22-23 PPA
form submitted to the CAC
No entry required
6 Ending Actual Available Cash Balance (06/30/23)
C to F = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4), G = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4 - 5)
$4,300 $- $- $951,536 $1,618
173
Orange City
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - Notes July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026
Item # Notes/Comments
4 61
70 130
131
132
174
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 8.1. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0693
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Russell Bunim, Community Development Director

1. SUBJECT
A Public Hearing to consider an amendment to the Orange General Plan including substantive updates to the Safety Element to comply with new State law, minor non- substantive text and graphic updates to additional Elements of the General Plan, and finding of CEQA exemption (General Plan Amendment No. 2024-0002). Resolution No. 11589.

2. SUMMARY
General Plan Amendment No. 2024-0002 will amend the Orange General Plan including both a substantive Safety Element amendment to comply with changes to State law and non-substantive revisions to other General Plan elements to refresh policies, text, and graphics for purposes of accuracy.

3. RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Conduct and close Public Hearing.

2. Adopt Resolution No. 11589. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange approving General Plan Amendment No. 2024-0002 amending the City of Orange General Plan Safety Element to comply with State law, and making non-substantive updates to City policies, text, and graphics to the remaining General Plan Elements and implementation plan to maintain document accuracy.

3. Find the proposal exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3), 15168(c), and 15162.

4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.

5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Provide for a Safe Community
d: Assure the development of the City occurs in a fashion that maximizes public safety.

6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
Safety Element Update:

Staff is proposing to amend the General Plan, including the Safety Element to respond to State laws related to wildland fires and fire hazard severity zones, and inter-agency coordination among City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
175
Item #: 8.1. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0693
related to wildland fires and fire hazard severity zones, and inter-agency coordination among agencies responsible for fire protection. These amendments include revised goals, policies, and objectives that help protect the community from risk of wildfire. Feasible implementation measures include but are not limited to:
· Avoiding or minimizing the wildfire hazards associated with new uses of land. · Locating, when feasible, new essential public facilities outside of high fire risk areas, or identifying construction methods or other methods to minimize damage if these facilities are located in fire hazard severity zone.
· Designing adequate infrastructure for new development located in fire hazard severity zones. · Working cooperatively with public agencies with responsibility for fire protection.

The City of Orange’supdated Safety Element was reviewed by the State of California Department of Fire, Board of Forestry and Fire Protection in July 2024 and was found to be in compliance with the requirements of the Government Code.

General Plan Language Clean Up:

Additional Elements of the General Plan have also been amended to provide minor text and graphic updates and non-substantive changes to City policies.

7. ADVISORY BOARD ACTION
Planning Commission:

On November 4, 2024, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of GPA 2024 -0002 by a vote of 7-0.

8. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed General Plan Safety Element update and General Plan language clean-up do not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. The proposed updates would amend the Safety Element to reflect State law, and minimize wildfire impacts to the City. The accuracy language clean up throughout the remainder of the General Plan, including text and graphic updates and limited non-substantive changes to City policies for document accuracy, will not have a significant effect on the environment; and, therefore, no additional analysis is required pursuant to CEQA.

In addition, the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 1815-09 (SCH#2006031117) for the Comprehensive General Plan Update was certified on March 9, 2010 and prepared in accordance with CEQA. The proposed General Plan amendment consists of limited non-substantive updates to policies, text, and graphics to maintain the accuracy of the document. None of these revisions have implications on the General Plan content that was evaluated in the technical analysis provided in the EIR.

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c), the City finds that the effects of the General Plan updates/amendments were contemplated in the General Plan Program EIR and the associated Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations. The City also finds that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the text and graphic amendments will not cause new significant environmental impacts or require new mitigation measures, which were not already identified in the General Plan Program EIR. The City finds that the proposed activity is within the scope of the project covered by the previously certified Program EIR and nothing further is necessary or required to City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
176
Item #: 8.1. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0693
covered by the previously certified Program EIR and nothing further is necessary or required to comply with CEQA.

9. PUBLIC NOTICE
On January 2, 2025, a notice was published in the Orange City News newspaper for a public hearing before the City Council on January 14, 2025.

10. ATTACHMENTS
· Attachment 1 Resolution No. 11589
· Attachment 2 Amended General Plan and Implementation Plan text and graphics (redline version)
· Attachment 3 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC 32-24 · Attachment 4 Planning Commission Staff Report, November 4, 2024 · Attachment 5 Draft Planning Commission Minutes, November 4, 2024 · Attachment 6 State of California Department of Fire, Board of Forestry and Fire Prevention Assessment
· Attachment 7 Fire Severity Zones Map
City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
177
Agenda Item
City Council
Item #: 8.1. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0693
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THRU: Tom Kisela, City Manager
FROM: Russell Bunim, Community Development Director

3. RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Conduct and close Public Hearing.

2. Adopt Resolution No. 11589. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange approving General Plan Amendment No. 2024-0002 amending the City of Orange General Plan Safety Element to comply with State law, and making non-substantive updates to City policies, text, and graphics to the remaining General Plan Elements and implementation plan to maintain document accuracy.

3. Find the proposal exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3), 15168(c), and 15162.

4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.

5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 1: Provide for a Safe Community
d: Assure the development of the City occurs in a fashion that maximizes public safety.

6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
Safety Element Update:

Staff is proposing to amend the General Plan, including the Safety Element to respond to State laws related to wildland fires and fire hazard severity zones, and inter-agency coordination among City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
178
Item #: 8.1. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0693
related to wildland fires and fire hazard severity zones, and inter-agency coordination among agencies responsible for fire protection. These amendments include revised goals, policies, and objectives that help protect the community from risk of wildfire. Feasible implementation measures include but are not limited to:
· Avoiding or minimizing the wildfire hazards associated with new uses of land. · Locating, when feasible, new essential public facilities outside of high fire risk areas, or identifying construction methods or other methods to minimize damage if these facilities are located in fire hazard severity zone.
· Designing adequate infrastructure for new development located in fire hazard severity zones. · Working cooperatively with public agencies with responsibility for fire protection.

General Plan Language Clean Up:

Additional Elements of the General Plan have also been amended to provide minor text and graphic updates and non-substantive changes to City policies.

7. ADVISORY BOARD ACTION
Planning Commission:

On November 4, 2024, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of GPA 2024 -0002 by a vote of 7-0.

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c), the City finds that the effects of the General Plan updates/amendments were contemplated in the General Plan Program EIR and the associated Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations. The City also finds that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the text and graphic amendments will not cause new significant environmental impacts or require new mitigation measures, which were not already identified in the General Plan Program EIR. The City finds that the proposed activity is within the scope of the project covered by the previously certified Program EIR and nothing further is necessary or required to City of Orange Printed on 1/9/2025Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
179
Item #: 8.1. 1/14/2025 File #: 24-0693
covered by the previously certified Program EIR and nothing further is necessary or required to comply with CEQA.

9. PUBLIC NOTICE
On January 2, 2025, a notice was published in the Orange City News newspaper for a public hearing before the City Council on January 14, 2025.

RESOLUTION NO. 11589

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF ORANGE APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 2024-0002 AMENDING THE CITY OF

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN SAFETY ELEMENT TO

COMPLY WITH STATE LAW , AND MAKING NON -

SUBSTANTIVE UPDATES TO CITY POL ICIES, TEXT,

AND GRAPHICS TO THE REMAINING GENERAL PLAN

ELEMENTS A ND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO

MAINTAIN DOCUMENT ACCURACY

APPLICANT: CITY OF ORANGE

WHEREAS, the City of Orange adopted a comprehensive update to the General Plan on March 9, 2010; and

WHEREAS, since adoption of the General Plan and subsequent updates there have been name changes and changes in scope of responsibility for some of the outside agencies involved with the provision of City services, as well as the policy documents administered by regional and state agencies; and

WHEREAS, a city’s General Plan must contain seven “elements” one of which is a Safety Element. The requirements for a Safety Element are contained in California Government Code Section 65302(g);

WHEREAS, the State of California has adopted amendments to the California Government Code, requiring the City to update the Safety Element of its General Plan; and

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, having considered the proposed changes to the General Plan Safety Element and throughout the entire General Plan contained in Exhibit “A” at a public hearing held on November 4, 2024, including review of the staff report and receiving public testimony on the item, has determined that General Plan Amendment No. 2024-0002 is appropriate and recommended City Council approval thereof; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves General Plan Amendment No. 20 24-0002, amending the City of Orange General Plan Safety Element and associated text and graphic revisions as depicted in Exhibit “A ” attached hereto and incorporated by this reference based on the following findings:

SECTION 1 – FINDINGS

The subject General Plan Amendment maintains the accuracy and relevance of the Orange General Plan to ensure its utility in guiding growth and change in the City in an informed and strategic fashion. The subject General Plan Amendment updates the Safety Element to comply with state 181
2 law, and makes adjustments throughout the General Plan, updating references to outside agencies and associated policy documents that serve or have jurisdiction over the City.

SECTION 2- ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

The proposed General Plan Safety Element update and General Plan language clean -up do not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. The proposed updates would amend the Safety Element to reflect state law, and minimize wildfire impacts to the city. The accuracy language clean up throughout the remainder of the Ge neral Plan, including text and graphic updates and limited non-substantive changes to City policies for document accuracy, will not have a significant effect on the environment; and, therefore, no additional analysis is required pursuant to CEQA.

In addition, the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 1815 -09 (SCH#2006031117) for the Comprehensive General Plan Update was certified on March 9, 2010, and prepared in accordance with the CEQA. The proposed General Plan amendment reflects updates to text and graphic revisions that are not substantive but more accurate references to outside agencies and related policy documents, current City and inter -agency practices, and dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency. As such, the proposed GPA ma kes non substantive edits to the General Plan, making the General Plan content consistent with the technical analysis provided in the EIR.

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c), the City finds that the effects of the General Plan updates/amendment were contemplated in the General Plan Program EIR and the associated Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations. The City also finds that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the text and graphic amendments will not cause new significant environmental impacts or require new mitigation measures, which were not already identified in the General Plan Program EIR. The City finds that the proposed activity is within the scope of the project covered by the previously certified Program EIR and nothing further is necessary or required to comply with CEQA.

ADOPTED this 14th day of January 2025.

Daniel R. Slater, Mayor, City of Orange

ATTEST:

Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange

182
3 APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney, City of Orange

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF ORANGE )

CITY OF ORANGE )

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange

183

CITY OF ORANGE

GENERAL PLAN

Adopted March 2010
Amended December 2015 and 2024

City Council

Carolyn Cavecche – Mayor
Tita Smith – Mayor Pro Tem
Denis Bilodeau – Councilmember
Jon Dumitru – Councilmember
Mark Murphy – Councilmember

Planning Commission

Matthew Cunningham
Robert Imboden
Michael Merino
Scott Steiner
Fred Whitaker

City Staff

John Sibley – City Manager
Alice Angus, AICP – Community Development Director
Ed Knight, AICP – Assistant Planning Director
Anna Pehoushek, AICP – Principal Planner
Jennifer Le – Senior Planner/Environmental
Coordinator
General Plan Advisory Committee

John Baker
Bill Bouska
Phyllis Cahill
Toni Carlton
Peggy Catron
Jeff Frankel
Robert Hitchcock
Janine Ingram
Martha Moyers
Karie Najemnik
James Obermayer
Bruce Ramm
Kathy Sorensen
Roy Shabazian
Sister Mary Therese Sweeney
Laura Thomas
Shawn Ward

Consultants to the City

EDAW, Inc.

In association with:

Alliance Acoustical Consultants
Chattel Architecture and Design
GRC
Keyser Marston Associates
MIG
P&D Consultants
PAR Environmental
Parsons Brinkerhoff
184

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-1

INTRODUCTION TO THE GENERAL PLAN
Orange is grounded by a unique and
rich history that provides a foundation
upon which the City is prepared to build
to meet the challenges of the 21 st
Century. This General Plan is the primary
source of long -range planning and
policy direction that will be used to
guide growth and change, and to
preserve and enhance the quality of life
within the community.

The General Plan strives to protect
those characteristics that make Orange
a desirable and distinctive place to live, work , and play. Those attributes include : 1) high- quality services that residents have come to expect; 2) a variety of residential, business, and recreational environments; and 3) the important role that the history and traditions of the City play in community life.

The esse nce of Orange is variety, quality, and surprise. Numerous housing options are accommodated in the Plan , allowing residents a range of housing types, including homes in the largest historic district in Southern California and suburban tract homes designed by a world-famous architect. Housing locations also vary from dense ly populated urban neighborhoods near public transit, cultural, and recreational activities to semi -rural equestrian environments close to nature. This Plan maintains that variety of choice.

Orange is a high-quality community that boasts world class hospitals, educational institutions, and business diversity. Its public services are second to none , its parks and open spaces attract visitors from around the region , and its business environment has made the City a regional economic leader. Yet, throughout its periods of growth and development, the City has maintained its small town attitude . With countless restaurants to enjoy in the City’s retail areas, many small shops to discover at the Plaza, and the Santiago Creek area to explore, Orange continues to offer welcome surprises.

As described above, Orange is already a very special place, but it is also a City at a crossroads in its history. This Plan comes at a critical juncture as the City expands its physical development one final time to the east. It ensures that the special quality of life that has defined this community is not lost as the region continues to be confronted by development pressures. Orange provides a strong sense of place and identity, and this General Plan is designed to protect those qualities for future generations.

Old Towne Orange shopping district
185

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-2
Purpose of the General Plan
“City planning is:
▪ An aid to the people in the street to visualize their city properly planned; ▪ A practical, sensible way of providing a place for everything with everything in its place; ▪ An instrument for uniting citizens to work for the city’s future; and ▪ An efficient means of avoiding duplication and waste in public improvements.” - adapted from John Nolen, 1926
Each city and county within California is required to adopt a general plan and update this plan at regular intervals. The purpose of the general plan is to anticipate and plan for “the physical development of the county or city, and any land outside its boundaries which bears relation to its planning” (California Government Code Section 65300).

Orange’s General Plan might be compared to a roadmap that will lead to a better future.

Contained within this roadmap is a description of Orange today, a vision of a desirable Orange of tomorrow, and the outline of a path, expressed through goals, policies and implementation measures, to achieve the vision’s promise of tomorrow.

To be considered comprehensive, this General Plan must address many issues that influence land use decisions. Specifically, state law requires that the General Plan address not only land use but also circulation, housing, the conservation of natural resources, the preservation of open space, the noise environment , and the protection of public s afety (Government Code Section 65302). In addition to addressing the issues required b y the state, Orange’s General Plan also addresses important local issues involving cultural resources, economic development, urban design, and growth management.

The primary benefit of long range planning is that it allows the City to control, to the degree possible, its own destiny. Much of the vision statement and many of the goals and policies outlined in this Plan will , if implemented, enhance livability for residents, foster a better business climate, and provide for the city’s visitors. The links forged within the Plan between land uses and the transportation, infrastructure, and public services networks will provide the flexibility needed to accommodate growth and change over the life of the Plan. The General Plan also focuses on strengthening the connections between residential neighborhoods and adjacent commercial centers and recreational amenities . Such connections may lead to a healthier lifestyle for residents by creating mobility options that did not exist before.

Orange’s Planning Area
Orange benefits from its location near six major freeways that link the City to residential communities, shopping , and jobs throughout Orange, Los Angeles , and Riverside Counties (Figure I-1). The planning area addressed by the General Plan is illustrated in Figure I-2.

The City of Orange lies in the heart of north -central Orange County, an area undergoing a marked change in land use. To the west and south are the rapidly growing and urbanizing cities of Anaheim and Santa Ana. To the southeast is the City of Tustin. Completely contained within the borders of Orange is the City of Villa Park. To the east lies vast acreage of 186

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-3
unincorporated land within the County of Orange. In addition to the corporate limits of the City, the planning area generally addresses portions of unincorporated Orange County located within and adjacent to the incorporated City limits . The planning area encompasses approximately 23,800 acres, including about 22,400 acres within the City’s corporate limits and 1,400 acres of unincorporated land within the sphere of influence (SOI). An additional 15,800 acres of Orange’s remaining SOI are located east of the C ity and outside the planning area.

A primary goal of the General Plan is to realize the long -held vision of “One Orange” —a city that stretches from the Santa Ana River to the Anaheim Hills, supporting a wide variety of residential lifestyles. These residential options include the dense urban environment of Uptown, the small town flavor of Old Towne, the “modernism for the masses” neighborhoods of the Eichler tracts, and tranquil, equestrian-oriented neighborhoods such as Orange Park Acres.

Orange is connected to the surrounding region through a complex network of freeways; through Metrolink, a heavy rail commuter system; and through bus transit provided by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). The City occupies a unique geographic location that offers residents and businesses easy access to both the benefits of urban living and the quiet solitude of open spaces and suburban life.

A Brief History of Orange
In order to prepare for the future, it is often worthwhile to look to the past for inspiration. A review of Orange’s dynamic history reveals seven important phases: pre -colonization, colonization, early settlement, agriculture and industry, immigration and ethnic diversity, interwar development, and postwar development.

Pre-Colonization (before 1800)
The City of Orange has a rich cultural heritage stretching back perhaps as far as 15,000 years.

Evidence of pre-colonial occupation indicates an evolution from mobile foraging to sedentary settlement patterns. By the Late Prehistoric Period, human settlements with high population densities and complex political, social, technological, and religious systems were typical throughout the Los Angeles Basin. This period ended abruptly when Spanish colonists began establishing missions along the California coast.

The City of Orange is situated within the ethnographic territory of the Gabrielino Indians of California. The Gabrielino people lived in either permanent or semi -permanent villages, primarily along coastal estuaries and major inland watercourses. Gabrielino culture was heavily affected by colonial Spanish missionary efforts, with disease and forced participation in the mission system disrupting most traditional culture and resulting in a catastrophic reduction of the native population.
187

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-4

Figure 1-1 Regional Location Map
188

I-5 Figure 1-2 Orange Planning Area
189
190

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-7
While traveling through the area in 1769, Father Juan Crespi, whose diaries are the first written account of interactions between Spanish priests and the indigenous populations, noted the presence of a large village, Hotuuknga, upstream from present day Olive on the north side of the Santa Ana River. Crespi wrote that 52 Indians came to greet their party and accepted blankets, beads, and other goods. When he returned two years later, the group was hostile and the Spaniards quickly continued on their way. As late as the 1870s, a small “Indian camp” was visible on the north side of Santiago Creek just west of the Glassell Street crossing.

Colonization (circa 1800-1870)
The first landowner in the Orange area was Juan Pablo Grijalva, a retired Spanish sol dier. His land extended from the Santa Ana River and the foothills above Villa Park to the ocean at Newport Beach. Along with his son -in-law, Jose Antonio Yorba, he began a cattle ranch and built the first irrigation ditches to carry water from the Santa Ana River. After Grijalva’s death, Yorba and his nephew, Juan Pablo Peralta, received title to the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana land grant with a total of 78,941 acres.

After California became a state in 1848, one member of the extended family that owned the Rancho—Leonardo Cota —borrowed money from Abel Stearns, who was the largest landowner in Southern California. Cota put up his share of the Rancho as collateral. When Cota defaulted on the loan in 1866, Stearns filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court to demand a partition of the land so that Stearns could claim Cota’s section. As a result, the Rancho was subdivided into 1,000 units parceled out to the heirs and the claimants in the lawsuit.

Early Settlement (circa 1870-1920)
The early roots of the Orange we recognize today had their origins in the partitioning of the Rancho. Two of the most important historic areas within the city —Old Towne and El Modena—were established at this time.

Old Towne
When the Rancho Santiago de
Santa Ana was subdivided in
the late 1860s, a Los Angeles
Lawyer, Alfred B. Chapman,
represented several parties in
the partition suit. As payment
for his fees, Chapman acquired
approximately 4,000 acres. In
1870, Chapman hired another
lawyer, William T. Glassell, to
survey and subdivide his land
holdings into farm lots ranging
in size from 10 to 40 acres.

Old Towne Orange commercial building, circa 1900
191

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-8
A Craftsman bungalow in Old Towne Orange, circa 1916
With an eye to the future, the founde rs set aside eight lots in the center of the newly subdivided blocks of land, to be used as a public square. This public amenity is now known as Plaza Square, or simply the Plaza. In honor of the founders, the two main streets, which intersected at the public square, were named Chapman Avenue (running east -west) and Glassell Street (north-south).

Orange grew rapidly during the Great Boom of the 1880s. New settlers flocked to the region due to cross -country expansion, inexpensive rail fares, and the balmy Southern California climate. Many of the new settlers entered Orange via the Santa Fe Railroad (later called the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe) Depot four blocks west of the Plaza (currently the site of the historic Santa Fe Depot building and Depot Park). Much of the real estate boom of the 1880s was driven by speculation . Landowners subdivided their ranches in order to sell individual lots, which were often bought by speculators. By 1887, dozens of new subdivisions and four new townsites were laid out. Connecting these new communities were two horse -drawn streetcar systems: the Orange, McPherson and Modena ; and the Santa Ana, Orange and Tustin lines.

By the late 1870s and early 1880s, the population of Orange was large enough to support the construction of civic buildings and gathering places such as churches, schools, and public parks. As the community continued to grow and lots were further subdivided, the new residents named the streets after the towns they came from in the East , such as Batavia and Palmyra.

Orange incorporated on April 6, 1888. At the time of incorporation, Orange was about three square miles, with 600 people who predominantly lived on small family ranches surrounding the town. Although most residents lived on working farms, some homes —generally for the town’s doctors, lawyers, and
merchants—were built on the small
lots surrounding the Plaza.

After the Great Boom of the 1880s
became a bust, major construction in
Orange lay dormant for over ten
years. With the new century came
growth in the town’s citrus industry
and an increase in economic
prosperity. The Plaza soon became
the commercial and social hub of
Orange. Radiating out from the
Plaza, Chapman Avenue and Glassell
Street became favored locations for
the principal banks, newspapers,
stores, and public institutions.

Residential development , which
increased to meet growing
demand, occurred on the secondary streets beyond the Plaza and commercial center. 192

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-9
El Modena
Paralleling the early settlement of Old Towne was the establishment of another town located approximately three miles to the east. Known as El Modena, this small enclave evolved from a Quaker village into a citrus-farming Mexican-American barrio over the course of its nearly 120- year history. San Francisco millionaire and philanthropist David Hewes became one of the primary developers in the area when he bought hundreds of acres around 1885. By 1886, there were 400 people living in El Modena. In 1888, a horse drawn streetcar connected El Modena to Orange. By 1889 the building boom was over and the population declined briefly before rebounding with the successful establishment of the area as an important fruit growing location.

Agriculture and Industry (circa 1880-1950)
With the expansion of citrus farming, w ater quickly became a critical element for ongoing prosperity. In 1871, the A.B. Chapman canal began bringing water from the Santa Ana River to the townsite, with ranchers digging lateral ditches to their farms. By 1873, settlers began to develop wells, tapping into a water table only 18 feet below ground. A drought in 1877 motivated local ranchers to buy out the water company and form the Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Company (SAVI).

As a cooperative water venture, SAVI was vital to the agricultural development of the arid Southern California region. Beginning in the 1880s, the transcontinental railroad system granted growers in Orange County access to markets across the nation. The introduction of reliable irrigation and transportation systems was accompanied by a surge in agricultural production and productivity in Orange County. This was particularly true in Orange . From 1880 to 1950, citrus and other agricultural industries were the predominant influences on the economic, political, and cultural development of the city.

By 1893, citrus had become so dominant that the Orange County Fruit Exchange (now known as Sunkist) was organized and incorporated. Its headquarters, built at the northeast corner of Glassell Street and Almond Avenue, marked the beginning of Orange’s industrial district.

The citrus industry continued to grow until the Great Depression. Between 1933 and 1935 , unemployment in Orange County grew to 15 percent, leading to labor issues that culminated in a farm workers strike in 1936. Another blow to the citrus industry occurred in the 1950s with the spread of “Quick Decline” disease , which resulted in reduced crops and loss of trees. This, combined with the strong demand for housing after World War II and the need for developable real estate, began to diminish the once-powerful role of the citrus industry.

Immigration and Ethnic Diversity (circa 1910-1950)
Two international events had significant effects on El Modena and Orange in the 1910s: the Mexican Revolution and World War I. Beginning around 1910, many Mexican families came to the U.S. seeking refuge from the chaos sparked by the Mexican Revolution. When the U.S. entered World War I in 1917, men across the country were drafted into the war effort. As a result, the fruit harvesting workforce dwindled, creating employment opportunities for these new immigrants. The increased demand for workers and the influx of Mexicans supported two vibrant communities: the Cypress Street Barrio and El Modena. The ethnic diversity of Orange was also increased by many Chinese railroad workers who made it their home. 193

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-10
Cypress Street Barrio
Beginning in 1893, Mexican citrus workers settled on Cypress Street, a short distance west of the Plaza, when a packinghouse was built on the 300 block of North Cypress. Growers realized that having an easily accessible, stable, and permanently housed workforce assured a lessened chance of labor problems. Residents of the Cypress Street Barrio were a tight-knit group with many new residents coming from the same villages in Mexico. Today, some residents can trace their family’s neighborhood roots back four generations.

In 1946, the City instituted new zoning laws that designated much of the Barrio for light industrial use. Because of this zoning, residents could not qualify for permits to rebuild or remodel their homes.

El Modena
By the 1920s, the town of El Modena began to take on a distinctly Mexican character. Many Mexican-American El Modena families worked in packinghouses and orchards. The area was isolated from surrounding communities by swathes of fruit tree groves. Property lots in El Modena were small, creating a very intimate community whose focus was on the church and the nearby schools.

Segregation
Isolation and segregation from the Anglo residents of Orange were unfortunate facets of life for the residents of El Modena and the Cypress Street Barrio . Many popular recreational activities were segregated, including movie theaters. Mexican-Americans were restricted from playing ball in public parks and their use of the community pool was limited to Mondays, because the pool was drained on Monday night. The effects of segregation were also felt in the schools, where Mexican-American student enrollment was restricted to “La Caballeriza” (“The Barn”), a two -room wooden schoolhouse behind the Lemon Street School.

A breakthrough came in 1947 , when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the League of United Latin American Citizens in the case Mendez v. Westminster , ordering that “school districts not segregate on the basis of national origin.” El Modena was among the four school districts subject to this ruling. In the wake of Mendez came the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954. As integration slowly commenced, many disgruntled Anglo families moved away, settling in newly drawn school districts that were often “re” - segregated.

The original town proper of El
Modena, north of Chapman
Avenue, continues to be an
unincorporated part of Orange
County, despite annexation in
the 1960s and 1970s of
surrounding areas by the ever -
growing City of Orange. Although
many additions and alterations to
the area’s older homes have
La Morenita general store in El Modena, circa 1930
194

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-11
taken place, the single-family, working-class residential character of El Modena remains.

Interwar Development (circa 1920-1941)
As the citrus economy continued to flourish into the 1920s, the demand for housing grew and fueled the architectural diversity of the city. The first residential neighborhoods were created on a compact grid of streets. The cottages and California -oriented Craftsman houses of the 1910s and early 1920s were followed by European -influenced Tudor, Provincial, Mediterranean, and Norman Revival styles. The Mediterranean Revival style was the most popular in Orange, and houses in this style that remain exist primarily on the outskirts of the original townsite. Beginning in the 1930s, Ranch and Minimal Traditional style homes became dominant due to the economic restraints created by the Great Depression. Minimal Traditional homes tend to be boxy , with flat wall surfaces and little ornamentation or other detailing; they often feature simplified features of Tudor and Colonial Revival styles. Ranch homes became the most prevalent type of housing built in the United States between the 1930s and 1960s. Throughout the 1920s and up until World War II, Orange grew slowly and methodically. The boundaries of the original townsite were expanded with new residential areas, with infill development completing the historic area that is now known as Old Towne.

Postwar Development
(circa 1945-1975)
World War II brought
prosperity to southern
California’s economy and
ended the ravages caused
by the Great Depression,
which had devastated fruit
prices. After World War II,
the face of California was
changed forever by
returning soldiers and a
massive influx of new state
residents. Orange, located
centrally in the Los Angeles
metropolitan area, was no exception . Military personnel, facing housing shortages in other areas, moved into the region. Orange’s remaining open and agricultural space was highly attractive to developers of bedroom communities.

By the 1950s, many ranchers readily sold their acreage; orange groves were succumbing to the “Quick Decline” disease and the demand for real estate for housing construction soared.

Orange’s explosive suburban residential growth began in 1953 and peaked in 1962 , when thousands of acres of land were sold for development. Between 1950 and 1960, the local population swelled from 10,000 to 26,000 as former orchards were torn out and replaced with subdivisions of single-family homes. Most of the larger tracts (50 -100 homes) were built by outside developers, though there were a few local developers who worked on a smaller scale. One of the more notable developers working in Orange during this period was Joseph Eichler, who built three tracts to the north and east of Old Towne. These Eichler A Mediterranean Revival residence in Old Towne Orange, circa 1920 195

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-12
developments brought distinct elegance, originality, and modern design principles to suburban homes.

Eichler Homes
Between 1949 and 1974,
Joseph Eichler built about
11,000 hom es in California,
including 575 i n Southern
California and 350 in Orange.

Frank Lloyd Wright’s Usonian
building principles , which
included integration with the
natural landscape, the use of
indigenous materials, and an
aesthetic to appeal to the
“common man,” gave Eichler ideas for his own suburban tract housing. Eichler hired a series of progressive firms , including Anshen & Allen, Jones & Emmons, and Claude Oakland Associates, to design innovative, modern, and affordable homes for California’s growing middle class consumers. For over two decades, Eichler Homes would utilize streamlined production methods, specialized construction materials, an innovative marketing campaign, and one of the first non -discriminatory suburban housing policies in the country to change the shape of California’s suburbs.

Chapman University
Chapman College was founded in 1861 as Hesperian College in Woodland, California by the Disciples of Christ. By 1920, Hesperian College merged with the new Los Angeles -based California Christian College. The major benefactor to California Christian College was Fullerton citrus rancher Charles Clarke Chapman, and in 1934 the college was renamed Chapman College.

After World War II, as returning veterans with G.I. Bill funding filled college classrooms across the nation, Chapman College required a larger campus to accommodate the higher student population. When the Orange Unified School District proposed building a new high school, Chapman College purchased the old Orange Union High School campus at Glassell Street and Palm Avenue. Chapman College moved to this site in 1954 and became the first four -year, accredited college in Orange County. In 1991, the college changed its name to Chapman University.

Civic and Community Development
The surge in Orange’s population in the 1950s and 1960s created a need for new government buildings to replace the early City Hall, Fire Station, and Carnegie Library. The Orange Public Library (then addressed as 101 North Center Stree t, but now as 407 East Chapman Avenue) was completed in 1961. Welton Becket and Associates designed a new civic center completed in 1963. Several fire stations were constructed during the 1960s, including a new headquarters on South Grand Street in 1969. A new main post office was constructed on Tustin Avenue in 1971.

Fairhaven Tract residence designed by architect A. Quincy Jones, circa 1960
196

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-13
New business districts were also created during the mid -1950s, diminishing downtown Orange’s importance as the city’s major commercial center. Major shopping centers opened on the corners of Tustin Street, Chapman Avenue, Collins Avenue, Glassell Street, North Batavia Street, East Katella Avenue, Meats Avenue, Main Street, and La Veta Avenue, attracting supermarkets, restaurants, hardware stores, banks, and gas stations, among other businesses. Shopping centers built during the 1960s and 1970s include Town and Country Village Shopping Center, the Mall of Orange (now The Village at Orange), and The City Shopping Center (now The Block at Orange).

The industrial areas located on the City’s west side continued to flourish. Lots were consolidated, allowing for larger structures. The first of the office condominiums were completed. The growth pressures in the industrial area started to affect the quality of life for those living in the Cypress Street Barrio area and other residential pockets within the industrial district.

Modern Orange: 1975-Present
During the postwar suburban construction boom, the most desirable land for subdivisions was the flat coastal plain where cities such as Garden Grove, Westminster, and Costa Mesa developed. By the late 1960s, construction slowed. Further development stalled with the energy crisis of 1973. By the 1980s, however, the foothills to the east of El Modena became prime real estate. Orange Park Acres, which lies between Chapman Avenue and Santiago Canyon Road, was first subdivided in 1928, but most of the area was annexed by the City of Orange during the 1990s. The Orange campus of Rancho Santiago Community College was constructed in 1985 and became Santiago Canyon College in 1997. As a result of this continued residential development, by the late 1990s the citrus packing industry had steadily moved out of Orange County. Today the only operating packinghouse in Orange County is in the City of Orange.

Once the flatlands were fully developed, the remaining undeveloped lands that were previously thought to be too expensive or complicated to develop, including the hillsides, became much more desirable. In 2005, the City approved a development proposal for the remaining undeveloped hillsides to the east of Orange and within its SOI. The newest neighborhoods in Orange are Santiago Hills II and East Orange, which consist of approximately 4,000 homes. Both neighborhoods are located adjacent to the Irvine Ranch Land Reserve, and have significantly expanded the boundaries of Orange towards the east.

These areas comprise approximately 6,821 acres, with 4,988 acres set aside as permanent open space. Part of the development agreement called for the inclusion of amenities such as neighborhood parks, a 20-acre regional sports park, public trails, and a new fire station.

Historic Growth
As shown in Figure I -3, the birthplace of the City of Orange can be traced to a single spot — the intersection of Chapman Avenue and Glassell Street. The City founders felt that a grand public space right in the heart of the community would be an asset that would help them sell lots. Now known as Plaza Park, this park and traffic circle is the hub of the City.

The original city plot was for a 1-square-mile town divided by a north-south commercial corridor and an east-west commercial corridor. The surrounding quadrants were residential 197

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-14
areas. Moving outward from the Plaza, lot sizes grew progressively larger. This original area, now known as Old Towne, has become one of the most cherished destinations in Orange County.

Once the original square mile district was fully built out, the City began to grow through annexation. Nutwood Place, a residential subdivision to the south, was the first area annexed. Factors such as the Great Depression and World War II limited growth until 1950.

By 1950, the demand for housing and the decline of the citrus industry combined to change Orange forever. The first areas to see growth and then annexation were the industrial lands west of the railroad tracks, south of Sycamore Avenue , and east of the River. This included the adjoining residential neighborhood.

Between 1960 and 1970, Orange saw some of its greatest periods of growth. The original farms north of Old Towne were redeveloped as residential subdivisions. These subdivisions sought annexation to take advantage of the high quality of services for which Orange is known. The area north of Collins Avenue saw dozens of residential neighborhoods spring up.

Industry found a home west of the railroad tracks, east of the Santa Ana River, and north of the Bitterbush Channel (Sycamore Avenue). Areas adjacent to the new 57 Freeway west of the Santa Ana River were also brought into the fold, including the area where the UCI Medical Center stands today. Growth also occurred east of Old Towne, including the areas surrounding the El Modena and McPherson neighborhoods.

In the 1970s, the only area newly annexed to the city w as the Nohl Ranch area at the City’s northern border. This suburban residential district is bisected by Meats Avenue. In the 1980’s, the Irvine Company’s Santiago Hills and other projects redefined Orange’s eastern boundary.

This growth also included the development of Santiago Canyon College. The unincorporated Orange Park Acres neighborhood was surrounded by this large scale development.

By the 1990s, the City was well established. Additional areas annexed to the City were mostly infill development projects, including residential neighborhoods adjacent to Hart Park, north of Bond Avenue along Hewes Street, suburban residential tracks near Cerro Villa Park and Belmont Park, and a residential neighborhood located near Cannon Street.

Since 2000, numerous parcels have been annexed to the City, including the Del Rio/River Bend site along the Santa Ana River at the northwest tip of the city, a residential neighborhood centered on Serrano Park, a large parcel to the east of the current boundary along Chapman Avenue where it climbs up the hillside, and about a dozen small County islands surrounded by previously incorporated areas.

The Vision for the Future
By understanding the historical factors that have helped shape today’s Orange, the City is well-positioned to chart a course to achieve its vision for the future. The Vision Statement is the foundation for General Plan goals and policies. It is an expression of our shared values and requirements for Orange’s future. The Vision identifies the ideal conditions to work toward over the next 20 years and provides guidance for our policy makers as they work to improve the quality of life in Orange.
198

I-15 Figure 1-3 Orange’s Historic Growth
199
200

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-17
A VISION FOR ORANGE: 2030
Preamble
The people, neighborhoods, businesses, and educational and religious institutions define Orange. Our identity has been enhanced because we have honored the past while creating our future. We must continue to maintain our small town character within residential neighborhoods, while providing a wide range of services, products, and amenities in our commercial, retail, and industrial districts.

Where We Live
Our vision for Orange is to continue to provide housing for all lifestyles within its diverse population. The General Plan will strive to maintain the different residential areas that make Orange unique: whether living in a semi -rural area that provides scenic views of natural beauty and convenient access to nature and trails; residing in a traditional suburban neighborhood setting; or enjoying the urban core experience near shops, restaurants, civic facilities, and public services. In the future, we will strive to achieve the following objectives:
▪ Orange must continue to encourage a variety of living environments for a diverse population, consistent with existing neighborhoods.
▪ The City will build upon existing assets to create a living, active , and diverse environment that complements all lifestyles and enhances neighborhoods, without compromising the valued resources that make Orange unique.
▪ The City will continue efforts to protect and enhance its historic core. This same type of care and attention will be applied throughout the rest of the City. ▪ The City will w ork to improve the quality of life for all residents by providing residential, commercial, industrial, and public uses that exist in harmony with the surrounding urban and natural environments.
▪ Residential areas will be connected to commercial, recreational, and open space areas, as well as educational and cultural facilities via a balanced, multi -modal circulation network that accommodates vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, hikers, and equestrians. This network will create additional opportunities for walking and biking, enhancing safety and well - being for neighborhoods and businesses.
▪ The City will encourage a local economy that provides ample commercial, financial, office, and industrial opportunities that provide employment and sufficient revenue to support important community services.
▪ Orange recognizes the importance of managing development in a manner that ensures adequate and timely public services and infrastructure and limits impacts on the natural environment.
201

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-18
Where We Work
Our vision for Orange is to find an appropriate balance between residential, commercial, and industrial demands. This vision encourages the City’s retail districts to improve piece by piece, so that their efforts will result in a public realm along Chapman Avenue, Tustin Street, Katella Avenue, and Main Street that will be characterized by visually attractive commercial development, active public areas, high -quality streetscapes, and innovative design that complements Orange’s heritage.

To achieve our vision, we shall work toward the following objectives:
▪ The City will strive to provide for a range of businesses including both small, family - owned businesses and larger businesses that serve a regional market. ▪ The appearance and variety of commercial, retail, industrial, and employment centers will reflect the pride that residents have for Orange, as well as the long-term investments the City has made in its infrastructure.
▪ Orange will tap into the entertainment and hospitality markets by enabling development of high-quality facilities strategically located near other regional tourist draws. ▪ We will con tinue to support educational and medical institutions and other industries that provide high paying jobs and are major contributors to the community.

Where We Play
Our community recognizes that its quality of life will be judged by how well we connect with our surroundings. Therefore, this General Plan has focused on maintaining and creating those special places that bring us together. It is paramount to reinforce the connections between those places and the community, so that all our residents and visitors can share and enjoy the outdoors and other activities.

Therefore, our Vision includes the following objectives:
▪ The City will work to define neighborhoods through the use of open space areas and a trail system that provides a source of aesthetic beauty and recreational opportunities.

These open space areas support a healthy and active community. ▪ We will continue to protect our critical watersheds, such as Santiago Creek, and other significant natural and open space resources.
▪ The City will strive to build a comprehensive system of parks, open space, equestrian areas, scenic resources, undeveloped natural areas, as well as a full array of recreational, educational, and cultural offerings such as libraries, sports, entertainment areas, and play facilities.
▪ We will develop a connected multi-modal network for traveling from one end of town to the other that provides the option for residents from different neighborhoods to access parks, open spaces, and scenic areas by vehicle, transit, foot, bicycle or, where appropriate, horse.
202

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-19
Visioning Process and Community Participation
Vital to the success of this General Plan update was the high level of participation from the public. The objective for the community participation component of the General Plan was to rely upon members of the community to provide direction for the Plan, to assist in the drafting of the Vision Statement, and to identify issues and opportunities that will enhance the quality of life in Orange. A variety of outreach tools allowed all who wished to participate to do so in a manner with which they felt comfortable. Outreach tools included articles in the City’s quarterly newsletter, workshops targeting seniors and youth, and stakeholder interviews including talks with the City Council and City department heads. Focus group discussions were conducted with representatives of special interest groups, including business owners, developers and real estate experts, community resource organizations, open space and trail advocates, and neighborhood groups. Additional focus group sessions were conducted with representatives from housing organizations, historic preservation and arts organizations, parks and recreation advocates, and the local hospitals. Other focus groups were comprised of infrastructure experts, education representatives, and those who work in the circulation and mobility fields.

Leading the effort was the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC). The GPAC membership consisted of community representatives appointed by the City Council who brought broad - based insights regarding the issues and opportunities confronting Orange over the next two decades. The GPAC membership represented diverse community interests and geographic areas of the City. The GPAC was the principal body for identifying , confirming, and validating community concerns and desires, and function ed as a conduit between City, residents, property owners, and the business community. The group extensively analyzed a full spectrum of community issues, opportunities, and challenges. The GPAC met nine (9) times and successfully drafted and adopted the Vision Statement, identified and reviewed future options for land use opportunity areas, and drafted goals and policies for each General Plan element. In addition to their meetings, the GPAC toured the City by bus and shared their impressions with City staff and the rest of
the group.

The City also conducted four (4)
community-wide workshops. The first
workshop focused on the opportunity
areas selected by the GPAC. The
workshop objective was to identify issues
and opportunities for each area. The
second workshop was based on the input
from the first workshop and was a
review of potential land use alternative
scenarios for the opportunity areas. The
direction gained from the second
workshop was further refined and
presented to the public at the third
workshop, where the long -term impacts
of each scenario were considered. Finally,
a fourth workshop was held to validate
Orange residents provided numerous ideas for future
land use options in many City neighborhoods during
workshops.
203

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-20
the Vision Statement, the preferred land use scenarios, and the goals and polic ies crafted by the GPAC. In addition to these workshops, the City made a special effort to reach out to both youth and seniors, with individual workshops focused upon each of these groups.

Other community participation tools included Joint Workshops with the City Council and the Planning Commission , and working with the Chamber of Commerce’s Junior Leadership group.

The City also invited representatives of the regions’ Native American tribes to contribute to the process. The tribes contacted included the Juaneno Band of Mission Indians and the Gabrieleno/Tongva Tribal Council.

Organization and Use of the General Plan
The Orange General Plan contains goals, policies, and plans to guide land use and development decisions in the future. The General Plan consists of the following elements, or chapters:
▪ Land Use Element
▪ Circulation & Mobility Element
▪ Natural Resources Element
▪ Public Safety Element
▪ Noise Element
▪ Growth Management Element
▪ Cultural Resources &Historic Preservation Element
▪ Infrastructure Element
▪ Urban Design Element
▪ Economic Development Element
▪ Housing Element
As shown in Figure I -4, Orange’s General Plan sometimes deviates from the state- and county-mandated elements in non -substantive ways to better conform to the objectives of the Vision Statement. For example, the state-required Conservation and Open -Space Elements have been combined in the Natural Resources Element . In addition to the state- mandated elements, stipulations of Orange County’s Measure M require cities to prepare a Growth Management Element, addressing timely provision of capital facilities and public services associated with new development.

The Orange General Plan also includes optional elements that address unique concerns that will affect Orange’s quality of life in the future. These optional elements include Cultural Resources & Historic Preservation , Infrastructure, Urban Design, and Economic Development.

Several supporting documents were produced during the development of the General Plan, including the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (Program EIR). Other technical reports and studies used in preparing the Plan include an existing land use survey, a traffic/circulation model, a historic resources inventory and cultural resources predictive model, and market studies and fiscal impact reports for opportunity areas identified in the Land Use Element.
204

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-21

Figure I-4 General Plan Structure
205

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-22
General Plan Structure
The General Plan document is comprised of this Introduction, and eleven elements. Each element may stand alone, but is also an integral part of the overall plan. The General Plan is accompanied by an Implementation Program and Glossary. Each of the elements is organized according to the following format: 1) Introduction; 2) Issues, Goals, and Policies; and 3) the Plan.

The Introduction of each element describes the focus and the purpose of the element. The relationship of the element to other General Plan elements is also specified in the Introduction.

The Issues, Goals, and Policies section of each element contains a description of identified planning issues, goals, and policies related to the element topic, based on input received from the community, members of the GPAC, and members of the City Council, Planning Commission, and City staff. Issues represent the needs, concerns, or desires addressed by the General Plan. Goals are overall statements of community desires and consist of broad statements of purpose or direction. Policies serve as guides to the City Council and City staff in reviewing development proposals and making other decisions that affect future growth and development in Orange.

Each element also contains a Plan section. The Plan section offers an overview of the City’s course of action to implement identified goals and policies. Many of the elements also contain one or more policy maps which consolidate the various opportunities, constraints, classifications, and policies expressed in the Element in graphic form. For example, the Land Use Element contains a “Land Use Policy Map” and a “Land Use Plan” identifying and describing the locations of future land uses by type, density, and intensity within the City of Orange.

Following the elements is the Implementation Program, which identifies specific actions to achieve the goals, policies , and plans identified in each General Plan element. The Implementation Program is provided as an Appendix to the General Plan.

The organization of the General Plan allows users to identify the section that interests them and quickly obtain a perspective of the City’s policies on that subject. However, General Plan users should realize that the policies in the various elements are interrelated and should be examined collectively. Policies are presented as written statements, tables, diagrams, and maps. All of these components must be considered together when making planning decisions.

Related Plans and Policies
State law places the General Plan atop the hierarchy of land use planning regulations. Several local ordinances and other City plans must conform to General Plan policy direction and work to implement the General Plan. Also, regional governmental agencies, such as the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) have been established in recognition of the fact that planning issues extend beyond the boundaries of individual cities. Efforts to address regional planning issues such as air and water quality, transportation, affordable housing, and habitat conservation have resulted in the adoption 206

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-23
of regional plans. The policies adopted by Orange will be affected by these plans, and will in turn have effects on these other plans . The paragraphs below describe ordinances, plans, and programs that should be consulted in association with the General Plan when making development and planning decisions.

Orange Zoning Code
The Zoning Code, the primary tool used to implement the General Plan, regulates development type and intensity citywide. Development regulations imposed include those setting limits on building height, requiring setbacks, and specifying the percentage of a site that must be landscaped. The Zoning Code also outlines standards for residential planned unit development and affordable housing, among many other land use issues.

Orange Redevelopment Plans
Under California law, cities can form redevelopment agencies and adopt redevelopment plans as mechanisms for facilitating community renewal. The Orange Redevelopment Agency (Agency) was established with redevelopment authority on August 11, 1983, with the adoption of Ordinance No. 21 -83. Since then, the Agency has been instrumental in upgrading the Tustin Street project area, redeveloping the Southwest Project area that includes the City’s southwest quadrant and the Old Towne Historic District, and renewing the Northwest Project area, which includes a large section of the City’s industrial areas. In 2001, the three redevelopment project areas were merged into one, known as the Orange Merged and Amended Redevelopment Project Area. The Agency strives to achieve its three -fold mission:
to enhance the commercial and industrial areas of the City; to revitalize those areas; and to increase, improve , and preserve the community’s supply of low - and moderate -income housing available at affordable housing cost. Orange’s City Council acts as the governing board of the Redevelopment Agency.

Specific Plans and Neighborhood Plans in Orange
A Specific Plan is a detailed plan for the development of a particular area. Falling under the broader umbrella of the General Plan, Specific Plans are intended to provide more finite specification of the types of uses to be permitted, development standards (setbacks, heights, landscape, architecture, etc.), and circulation and infrastructure improvements within identified subareas of the City. Specific Plans are often used to ensure that multiple property owners and developers adhere to a single common development plan . Further, they can provide flexibility in development standards beyond those contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Orange has utilized Specific Plans and Neighborhood Plans as tools to achieve the coordinated development of individual parcels within a broader context. Adopted Specific Plans and Neighborhood Plans include:
▪ Archstone Gateway
▪ Chapman University
▪ Immanuel Lutheran Church
▪ Orange Park Acres
▪ Pinnacle at Uptown Orange
▪ St. John’s Lutheran Church and School
▪ Santa Fe Depot Area
207

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-24
▪ Serrano Heights
▪ Upper Peters Canyon
Earlier planning efforts that have influenced the growth and change within Orange include the 1975 East Orange General Plan and the Orange Park Acres development plan.

California Environmental Quality Act
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was adopted by the state legislature in response to a public mandate for thorough environmental analysis of projects that could affect the environment. The provisions of the law and environmental review procedure are described in the CEQA Statutes and Guidelines . CEQA is the instrument for ensuring that environmental impacts of local development projects are appropriately assessed and mitigated. The City also maintains local CEQA Guidelines that provide more detailed guidance for the application of CEQA to new development in Orange.

SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan and Regional
Transportation Plan
In 1995, SCAG prepared a Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP) to address regional issues, goals, objectives, and policies for the Southern California region into the early part of the 21st century. The RCP was updated in 2008 based upon the SCAG’s 2000 Compass Blueprint Growth Vision, which calls for modest changes to current land use and transportation trends on only two percent of the land area of the region. A key component of the RCP is the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The RTP sets broad goals for the region and provides strategies to reduce problems associated with congestion and mobility. In recognition of the close relationship between traffic and air quality issues, the assumptions, goals, and programs contained in the RTP parallel those used to prepare the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The RTP was also updated in 2008 to implement transportation provisions of the RCP.

Air Quality Management Plan
The federal Clean Air Act requires preparation of plans to improve air quality in any region designated as a nonattainment area. A nonattainment area is a geographic region identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and/or the California Air Resources Board as not meeting state or federal standards for a given pollutant. The AQMP, prepared by SCAQMD, was first adopted in 1994 and is updated on a three-year cycle. It contains policies and measures designed to achieve federal and state air quality standards within the South Coast Air Basin. The assumptions and programs in the AQMP draw directly from regional goals, objectives, and assumptions in the RCP.

Orange County General Plan
The Orange County General Plan guides land use decision -making in unincorporated sections of the County. Orange’s SOI is also governed by the County General Plan. The City’s SOI is established by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) . A s properties in the SOI develop, they may also be annexed to and served by the City. The County and incorporated communities within the County have agreed , through a formal Memorandum of 208

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-25
Understanding, to consult with each other whenever development actions are proposed within a city’s SOI.

Local Agency Formation Commission Guidelines
The provisions of California’s Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 set forth procedures for LAFCOs throughout the state to review annexation applications. The Act was adopted to:
▪ encourage orderly development;
▪ ensure that populations receive efficient and high quality governmental services; and ▪ guide development away from open space and prime agricultural lands, unless such action promotes planned, orderly, and efficient development.

The Orange County LAFCO must adhere to adopted guidelines pursuant to the Act in its review of future City annexations within or beyond the City’s SOI.

County of Orange Master Plan of Arterial Highways
The County of Orange Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) forms part of the Orange County General Plan and designates the arterial system in the Circulation & Mobility Element of the General Plan. Defined according to specific arterial functional classifications, the MPAH serves to define the intended future roadway system for the County. Cities within the County are expected to achieve consistency with the MPAH in individual General Plan circulation elements. To implement changes to the MPAH, approval from the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) is required.

Measure M
In 1990, Orange County voters approved Measure M, authorizing a half -cent retail sales tax increase for a period of 20 years effective April 1, 1991. Revenue generated by Measure M is returned to local jurisdictions for use on local and regional transportation improvements and maintenance projects. To qualify for this revenue, each jurisdiction must comply with the Countywide Traffic Improvement and Growth Management Program. Specifically, to receive an allocation of Measure M funds, Orange must submit a statement of compliance with the growth management components of the program. Requirements include the adoption of a traffic circulation plan consistent with the County MPAH, adoption of a Growth Management Element within the General Plan, adoption and adequate funding of a local transportation fee program, and adoption of a seven -year capital improvement program that includes all transportation projects funded either partially or fully by Measure M funds.

The current Measure M expires in 2011, and a November 2006 ballot measure renewed the program (now known as M2) through 2031. M2 extends the requirements of Measure M, without increasing sales taxes, to fund freeway, street, transit, and environmental projects identified in a Transportation Investment Plan considered by voters in t andem with the renewal measure.

209

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-26
Orange County Central/Coastal Natural Communities
Conservation Plan
The Orange County Central/Coastal Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP) was approved in 1996. The NCCP is a program of the State of California designed to address the needs of habitats and species at the level of natural communities. An NCCP is a plan for conservation of natural communities that takes an ecosystem approach and encourages cooperation between private and government interests. It also provides for the regional and area-wide protection and perpetuation of plants, animals , and their habitats, while allowing compatible land use and economic activity. An NCCP seeks to anticipate and prevent the controversies caused by species listings (as federally endangered, for instance) by focusing on the long-term stability of natural communities.

National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Program Urban pollutants degrade water quality and adversely affect wildlife and plants dependent on aquatic habitat. The City is a co -permittee with the County of Orange in the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program, which is designed to reduce pollutants in runoff. According to the NPDES permit for the region , all new development projects and substantial rehabilitation projects are required to incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) as identified in the County Drainage Area Master Plan (DAMP). 210

INTRODUCTION

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
I-27

Introduction to the General Plan ................................................................................................................ 1 Purpose of the General Plan ................................................................................................................. 2 Orange’s Planning Area ......................................................................................................................... 2 A Brief History of Orange ....................................................................................................................... 3 FIGURE 1-1. Regional Location Map ................................................................................................. 4 I-5 FIGURE 1-2. Orange Planning Area ......................................................................................... 5 Historic Growth .................................................................................................................................... 13 The Vision for the Future ..................................................................................................................... 14 I-15 FIGURE 1-3. Orange’s Historic Growth .............................................................................. 15 Visioning Process and Community Participation ................................................................................. 19 Organization and Use of the General Plan .......................................................................................... 20 Figure I-4 General Plan Structure .................................................................................................... 21 Related Plans and Policies .................................................................................................................. 22

211

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-1
(REV. 12/15, GPA 2014-0001)

INTRODUCTION AND VISION FOR THE FUTURE
The Land Use Element describes the desired future physical and economic composition of Orange’s planning area and the planned relationship of uses. The primary objectives of the Element are to determine the future location, type, and intensity of new development and redevelopment projects, and to establish the desired mix and relationship between such projects to maximize the long-term livability of the community.

The City also seeks to achieve a number of additional objectives, consistent with Orange’s Vision for the Future, described in the General Plan Introduction. These objectives include:
▪ Providing policy guidance for Orange’s future based on innovative land use planning techniques, unifying the developed portion of the City with east Orange, and expressing community values.
▪ Encouraging a variety of semi -rural, suburban , and urban neighborhood living environments.
▪ Protecting and enhancing the City’s historic core, and expanding historic preservation efforts to other neighborhoods within the City.
▪ Encouraging new residential, commercial, industrial , and public uses within established focus areas.
▪ Supporting a multi -modal circulation network that accommodates vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, hikers, and equestrians.
▪ Managing future development in a manner that ensures adequate and timely public services and infrastructure.
▪ Improving the appearance and variety of the City’s commercial, retail, industrial , and employment centers.
▪ Enabling development of high quality entertainment -oriented mixed -use projects strategically located near regional tourist draws.
▪ Expanding open space areas and promoting completion of a trail system. ▪ Protecting critical watersheds and other natural and open space resources. 212

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-2
The Land Use Element provides a key policy foundation for the entire General Plan. Through the use of text and diagrams, the Land Use Element establishes clear and logical patterns of land use as well as standards for new development. The goals and policies contained in this Element establish a constitutional framework for future land use planning and decision - making in the City.

Another important feature of this Element is the Land Use Policy Map, which indicates the location, density, and intensity of development for all land uses citywide. The proposed land use designations identify the types and nature of development permitted throughout the planning area. The goals and policies contained in this Element are designed to ensure land use diversity and balanced development; encourage mixed -use development; promote commercial enterprise in Orange; encourage high quality industrial development; maintain and enhance the role of Old Towne within the community; encourage an efficient and responsible relationship between land use, transit, open space , and areas of environmental sensitivity; ensure City interests are achieved through inter -jurisdictional and regional planning; and encourage public involvement in land use planning decisions.

Purpose of the Land Use Element
The Land Use Element is one of seven elements required by the State to be included in Orange’s General Plan. The Land Use Element directs and defines development patterns by designating allowable uses, requirements, and locations for both existing and future development. This Element has the most wide-ranging scope in the General Plan, and affects all of the others. Although the interpretation of the Land Use Element is the responsibility of the community’s policymakers, this vision of long -term land use will influence short -term plans such as infill development, Specific Plans, and public works investments.

Scope and Content of the Land Use Element
The Land Use Element is divided into three sections:
(1) Introduction
(2) Issues, Goals, and Policies
(3) Land Use Plan
The Introduction defines the purpose, scope , and content of the Land Use Element, and its relationship to other General Plan Elements. The Issues, Goals, and Policies section describes the City’s intent to encourage diverse land uses that foster a vibrant and sustainable community, and to coordinate planning and public participation activities in determining future land uses. The Land Use Plan section communicates how these goals and policies will be implemented through land use diagrams and maps depicting assigned land uses, locations, and the extent of future use envisioned by the community.

The Land Use Plan complies with the requirements of the Land Use Element as stated in Section 65302 of California’s Government Code. Land uses requiring future planning include “housing, business, industry, open space, forest/timber, agriculture, natural resources, recreation, scenic beauty, education, public buildings and land, solid and liquid waste disposal facilities, and other public and private uses of land.” The Land Use Plan also establishes standards for residential density and non -residential building intensity for 213

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-3
designated land uses citywide , and it expresses the community’s vision for revitalization of eight focus areas located throughout the City.

Relationship to Other General Plan Elements
The Land Use Element serves as a guide for future development in the City and determines many key issues examined in the remaining Elements. For example, different land uses generate various trip demands , which influence the capacity and service levels of Orange’s transportation systems. The Circulation & Mobility Element lays out future transportation services and routes designed to meet the demands of both existing and future development.

Future residential development described in the Land Use Element affects the City’s housing goals, programs and objectives, which are discussed in the Housing Element. Land use decisions and the City’s long -range economic development strategy are also directly inter - related. This Element proposes new development strategies for a number of the City’s most important commercial corridors, and advocates intensification of certain areas as mixed -use corridors and urban office and employment centers. These Land Use Element policies are directly related to the long-range policies of the Economic Development Element.

The Land Use Element also designates areas to be used as open spaces, areas for parks and recreation, and areas for conservation and preservation of natural resources. Goals and policies regarding the preservation and maintenance of these areas are also addressed in the Natural Resources Element.

Land uses defined in the Land Use Element are also affected by the Urban Design Element.

The goals and policies of the Urban Design Element address physical characteristics of the community, such as building massing, concentration, setbacks, and landscaping features that affect land use requirements. The Cultural Resources & Historic Preservation Element expresses the City’s strategy for requiring preservation of structures and areas that carry historic significance.

Growth and development patterns in Orange are to be managed in a way that does not overwhelm or reduce the quality of services provided by the City’s infrastructure system. The goals and policies of the Growth Management and Infrastructure Elements are related to the contents of the Land Use Element because they affect land use designations and requirements.

Safety and noise abatement issues also relate to land uses. To comply with noise level requirements, land use designations are determined in tandem with noise contour maps in the Noise Element. Provisions are made within the Noise Element to allow higher noise levels within the mixed -use environments promoted within the Land Use Element. To mitigate or avoid damage and injury from natural and human-caused hazards, hazards maps in the Safety Element must also be consistent with the Land Use Element.

ISSUES, GOALS, AND POLICIES
The goals, policies, and implementation programs of the Land Use Element address eight citywide issues, as well as issues pertaining to eight focus areas identified within the City. 214

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-4
Citywide land use issues represent opportunities to improve the way land is currently used and the way future land use is planned. These opportunities capitalize on existing community assets, such as hospitals, universities and colleges, transportation networks, and natural features. Land use issues include: (1) ensuring land use diversity and balanced development; (2) encouraging mixed-use development for purposes of promoting convenient and efficient relationships between housing, employment, services, and transit; (3) promoting commercial enterprise in Orange; (4) encouraging high quality industrial development; (5) maintaining and enhancing the role of Old Towne within the community; (6) considering and promoting the contextual and environmental compatibility of various land uses; (7) ensuring City interests are achieved through inter-jurisdictional and regional planning; and (8) encouraging public involvement in land use planning decisions.

Land Use Diversity and Balanced Development
A well-balanced community provides a broad range of housing and business opportunities as well as recreational, institutional , and cultural activities that serve Orange’s diverse population and enhance the overall living environment. By encouraging a mix of land uses, the City can create an active and diverse environment that complements all lifestyles and supports neighborhoods. The City will continue to work toward creating a balanced inventory of land uses that meets the housing needs of all income groups and household types, creates a stable employment and tax base, maintains logical relationships between land uses and community assets, and provides residents with a diverse range of recreational opportunities.

GOAL 1.0: Meet the present and future needs of all residential and business sectors with a diverse and balanced mix of land uses.

Policy 1.1: Maintain a land use structure that balances jobs and housing with available infrastructure and public and human services.

Policy 1.2: Balance economic gains from new development while preserving the character and densities of residential neighborhoods.

Policy 1.3: Provide a range of housing densities and types to meet the diverse needs and lifestyles of residents.

Policy 1.4: Ensure that new development reflects existing design standards, qualities, and features that are in context with nearby development.

Policy 1.5: Prioritize recreation and open space uses at Irvine Lake and protect historic visual resources in east Orange.

Policy 1.6: Minimize effects of new development on the privacy and character of surrounding neighborhoods.

Policy 1.7: Provide a range of open space and park amenities to meet the diverse needs of current and new residents.

Encouraging Mixed-use
Development opportunities for creative commercial, residential, office, or mixed -use centers are emerging within older commercial corridors throughout the City. Three different styles of mixed-use are defined in the Land Use Plan and are implemented through five land use 215

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-5
designations. The three mixed -use styles are Neighborhood, Old Towne, and Urban. Future development options for these mixed-use areas rely on high quality, pedestrian-oriented design, incorporation of community open spaces, and full integration of alternative transportation modes. Successful completion of high quality mixed -use projects in Orange will assist the City in accomplishing multiple objectives concerned with housing, circulation, land use, economic vitality, recreation, and the environment.

GOAL 2.0: Create successful, high quality mixed -use districts consisting of a mix of residential, commercial, office, civic , and common open space land uses, supported by alternative modes of transportation.

Policy 2.1: Encourage development of mixed-use projects to revitalize older commercial areas throughout the City and industrial areas surrounding the historic Santa Fe Depot.

Policy 2.2: Encourage transfers of development rights within areas designated Urban Mixed-use on the Land Use Policy Map to promote development of high -rise office and residential structures at compatible locations.

Policy 2.3: Encourage transfers of development rights within areas designated Neighborhood Mixed-use and Old Towne Mixed -use on the Land Use Policy Map to promote historic preservation and creation of open spaces accessible to the community.

Policy 2.4: Encourage mixed-use projects that contain a variety of compatible uses, and provide necessary supporting public and community facilities.

Policy 2.5: Minimize traffic and parking impacts of proposed mixed-use projects.

Policy 2.6: Encourage linkage in and around mixed -use areas using a multi -modal circulation network, particularly transit, pedestrian sidewalk s, path s and paseos, and bicycle and trail systems.

Policy 2.7: Ensure that the architecture, landscape design, and site planning of mixed - use projects are of the highest quality, and that they emphasize a pedestrian orientation and safe, convenient access between uses.

Policy 2.8: Ensure that adequate gathering areas or plazas are incorporated within mixed-use projects and areas to allow for social interaction and community activities.

Policy 2.9: Encourage mixed-use development to include ground floor retail.

Vibrant Commercial Districts
Commercial activities continue to play an important role in shaping the City. Business activities provide jobs and revenue that support important community services. Much of the City’s revenue comes from sales tax generated by commercial establishments. The City will continue to revitalize and improve the appearance of aging commercial districts. The City will encourage land use patterns and development standards that promote vibrant commercial activities, take advantage of existing land use assets, assist existing businesses that want to expand, promote the local economy and existing establishments, and reinforce the relationship between neighborhoods and adjacent business districts with respect to goods, services, and employment.
216

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-6
GOAL 3.0: Create commercial uses that provide a solid economic base and employment opportunities and identify Orange as an attractive and diverse shopping destination.

Policy 3.1: Promote development of revenue -generating land uses that help defray the costs of high quality public services.

Policy 3.2: Actively promote the City as a place to shop and conduct business, and encourage local patronage of Orange businesses.

Policy 3.3: Improve vehicular, pedestrian, and visual connections between commercial areas and the rest of the community.

Policy 3.4: Discourage commercial and industrial enterprises that have significant adverse soil, air, water, or noise impacts.

Sustainable Industrial and Office Uses
Providing options for industrial development and office uses within the City is important, because these uses contribute to the economic wellbeing and the employment base of the community. Industrial development in Orange and throughout the region has changed significantly in recent years. Although traditional manufacturing activities continue to be a key component of Orange’s industrial areas, many such businesses have been replaced by warehousing uses and modern office uses that are more attractive in appearance and more compatible with adjacent neighborhoods. In some instances, large buildings and warehouses that once housed manufacturing or agriculture -oriented activities are now available for adapting to future residential, office, or commercial uses. In addition, Orange has experienced increased demand for larger, multi -story professional office complexes at locations such as South Main Street, Town and Country Road, La Veta Avenue, and The City Drive. Demand has also increased for medical office space surrounding local hospitals. The City will emphasize the important role industry continues to play in the community’s future, will encourage continued development of professional offices, and will ensure that the quality of the environment is not compromised by industrial uses.

GOAL 4.0: Encourage high quality, sustainable , industrial and office uses that provide jobs and revenue ; support environmental quality ; and promote options for adaptive re-use.

Policy 4.1: Maximize use of limited land resources for industrial and office uses within areas designated Light Industrial or Industrial on the Land Use Policy Map.

Policy 4.2: Encourage development of professional office space located near medical institutions and County facilities.

Policy 4.3: Protect residents and the environment from potential adverse soil, air, water, and noise impacts of industrial operations.

Policy 4.4: Encourage development of mixed office, industrial , and support commercial uses in areas designated Light Industrial on the Land Use Policy Map.

Policy 4.5: Accommodate a wide variety of industrial uses that contribute to a healthy and diverse economic base.
217

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-7
Old Towne Orange
When people think of Orange, they often think of the historic downtown district and adjoining residential neighborhoods. Old Towne Orange is an active, vibrant area that supports a variety of commercial, office, civic , and residential uses. In recent years, the City has taken steps to enable long -term preservation of many historic properties in the Old Towne area. This has created one of California’s most viable and recognized historic districts.

The historic Santa Fe Depot, associated Metrolink station, and Orange County Transportation Authority ( OCTA) Transportation Center provide valuable commuting options . Land use policies for Old Towne call for targeted growth in the area near the Santa Fe Depot , to be achieved through increased density and more walkable and transit -oriented development .

This area also provides opportunities for adaptive reuse of historic industrial buildings.

GOAL 5.0: Maintain and enhance the vibrant, transit -accessible, pedestrian -friendly, and livable character of Old Towne’s neighborhoods and commercial core.

Policy 5.1: Promote targeted development of mixed -use, transit-oriented development surrounding the Santa Fe Depot to achieve development intensities compatible with the fabric of Old Towne.

Policy 5.2: Promote adaptive re -use of previously industrial and agricultural historic structures for residential, office, or commercial purposes.

Policy 5.3: Continue to promote institutional and civic uses located throughout Old Towne.

Policy 5.4: Develop additional sensitively designed public parking throughout Old Towne.

Policy 5.5: Continue to require consistent, high quality, historically-referenced design within Old Towne.

Policy 5.6: Continue to upgrade infrastructure throughout Old Towne.

Policy 5.7: Ensure that roadway improvements within Old Towne are designed to promote walkability and a safe pedestrian environment.

Policy 5.8: Maintain balance between Old Towne and Chapman University’s growth , so that the University complements Old Towne.

Policy 5.9: Promote attractive and safe pedestrian access between the Santa Fe Depot and the Plaza.

Contextual and Environmental Compatibility
The quality of the physical environment , built or natural, plays a large part in defining Orange’s quality of life. Land use conflicts often occur when newer developments are insensitive to the use, scale or character of existing development and/or the surrounding natural environment. In other cases, older, obsolete nonconforming uses remain interspersed among newer development, as when old service stations or repair shops survive in the midst of residential development. Such conflicts can lead to degradation of the built and natural environments. The following goals and policies are designed to ensure contextual and environmental compatibility of development within the City, and to achieve compliance with local, regional, state, and federal environmental requirements. 218

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-8
These policies also represent an overview of the City’s strategy to consider the contextual and environmental effects of new development and reuse projects. Additional related policies addressing this topic may be found in the Natural Resources, Cultural Resources & Historic Preservation, Infrastructure, Urban Design, Public Safety, and Noise Elements.

GOAL 6.0: Advance development activity that is mutually beneficial to both the environment and the community.

Policy 6.1: Ensure that new development is compatible with the style and design of established structures and the surrounding environment.

Policy 6.2: In areas where residential uses abut commercial or industrial land uses , use buffering techniques to improve compatibility . Such techniques include the use of setbacks, screening, soundwalls with pedestrian access, and appearance standards.

Policy 6.3: Establish and maintain greenway s, and pedestrian and bicycle connections that complement the residential, commercial and open space areas they connect.

Policy 6.4: Create and maintain open space resources that provide recreational opportunities, protect hillside vistas and ridgelines, and conserve natural resources.

Policy 6.5: Reduce pollutant runoff from new development and urban runoff to the maximum extent practicable.

Policy 6.6: Enhance the walkability of both new and current development.

Policy 6.7: Integrate natural amenities and connections, including waterways and wildlife corridors, within the design of urban and suburban spaces.

Policy 6.8: Maximize landscaping along streetscapes and within development projects to enhance public health and environmental benefits.

Policy 6.9: Restrict development in areas where exposure to hazards such as flood, erosion, liquefaction, dam failure, hazardous materials , and toxic gases cannot be mitigated to reduce risk to residents and liability to the City.

Policy 6.10: Mitigate adverse air, noise, circulation, and other environmental impacts caused by new development adjacent to existing neighborhoods through use of sound walls, landscaping buffers, speed limits , and other traffic control measures.

Policy 6.11: Recognize the value of natural and cultural resources in the undeveloped portions of the planning area.

Policy 6.12: Maximize the land use opportunities for the Irvine Lake area by providing a mix of uses, such as lodging, housing, and recreational uses.

Coordinated Planning
Future planning considers ongoing planning efforts of other City departments, agencies, surrounding jurisdictions , and special districts. In addition, ongoing planning efforts undertaken by regional agencies such as the County of Orange, the Southern California Association of Governments, the Southern California Air Quality Management District, the 219

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-9
Orange County Transportation Authority, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, and others will be examined for consistency with the City’s long-range objectives.

GOAL 7.0: Promote coordinated planning among City departments and agencies, property owners, residents, special districts, and other jurisdictions in the region.

Policy 7.1: Coordinate with the Orange Unified School District and Community College District regarding future plans for their facilities.

Policy 7.2: Work with institutions within the City to ensure that implementation of their future plans is compatible with the City’s goals for surrounding areas.

Policy 7.3: Coordinate planning efforts with adjacent cities, special purpose agencies, utilities, and community service providers.

Policy 7.4: Ensure positive benefits for Orange from regional transportation, land use, air quality, waste management and disposal, and habitat conservation plans.

Policy 7.5: Work with and encourage other agencies and service providers to minimize potential visual and environmental impacts of their facilities on Orange.

Policy 7.6: Explore joint use agreements with other agencies to share existing and future public facilities among institutions in Orange.

Public Participation
The City recognizes that the single most important component of any future planning effort is public participation. The following goal and policies emphasize the need for continued public involvement in all parts of the planning process.

GOAL 8.0: Encourage active involvement of residents, businesses, and agencies in the planning and decision making process.

Policy 8.1: Continue to provide opportunities for public education and involvement in land use planning decisions through public hearings, community meetings, study sessions, electronic media , and any other appropriate and available means.

Policy 8.2: Emphasize public-private cooperation in implementing the General Plan and future planning activities.

Policy 8.3: Foster meaningful involvement and interaction among diverse groups within the City regarding land use planning efforts and decision making.

LAND USE PLAN
The Land Use Plan discusses how the City will grow and change over the next 20 years, and describes those aspects of the community that will be enhanced and maintained. Current and future land uses are categorized and mapped to identify where residential, commercial, industrial, and community facilities are anticipated to be located. The Land Use Plan describes the planned distribution and development intensities of all land uses in the City, and describes how the City’s land use goals will be achieved both citywide and within eight identified focus areas.
220

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-10
Land Use Distribution
The predominantly residential land use pattern in Orange reflects the City’s history of transition from a citrus-growing center clustered near the railroad to a town core surrounded by residential neighborhoods and supporting businesses and services. Based on a land use inventory completed in 2004,
residential development
represented the predominant land
use within Orange’s city limits, with
housing covering 46 percent of the
City’s land area. Commercial and
industrial uses represented about 14
percent of the City’s land area, while
natural hillsides, parks , and open
space represented 32 percent.

Figure LU -1 identifies the division of
on-the-ground land uses within the
City in 2004. Figure LU-1
Land Use Distribution (2004)
Land Use Density and Intensity
Planners describe the extent to which properties can be or are developed using the terms density and intensity. Density is used for residential uses and refers to the population and development capacity of a given parcel or group of parcels. Density within the General Plan is described in terms of dwelling units per net acre of land (du/ac), exclusive of existing or proposed streets and rights -of-way. Typical residential densities found within Orange are illustrated in Figure LU-2.

Development intensity, which applies to non -residential uses, refers to the extent of development on a parcel of land or lot (that is, the total building square footage, building height, the floor-area ratio, and/or the percent of lot coverage). While intensity is often used to describe non -residential development levels, in a broader sense, intensity also can describe overall levels of mixed residential and non-residential development. Throughout this Element, floor-area ratio (FAR) and building floor area square footage are used as measures of non-residential development intensity.
221

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-11
Figure LU-3
Floor Area Ratios Defined

Floor-area ratio (FAR) expresses the intensity of use on a lot (see Figure LU -3). The FAR represents the ratio between the total gross floor area of all buildings on a lot and the total land area of that lot. For example, a 20,000 -square-foot building on a 40,000 -square-foot lot yields an FAR of 0.50. A 0.50 FAR describes a single-story building that covers half of the lot, a two-story building covering approximately one -quarter of the lot, or a four -story building covering one-eighth of the lot.

For purposes of illustration, the diagrams in
Figure LU -4 provide examples of FAR for
commercial retail and office sites drawn
from throughout the City. The middle
example illustrates buildings within two
square blocks of Old Towne Orange along
Glassell Street north and south of Chapman
Avenue. The lot area is approximately
549,800 square feet and the gross floor
area of the buildings is approximately
549,900 square feet (most of the buildings
have two stories). As shown in the diagram,
when the gross building floor area is
divided by the lot area, an FAR of
approximately 1.0 results. The same
process is illustrated for office properties
located along Town and Country Road, and
industrial areas located on Glassell Street,
north of Taft Avenue.

Figure LU-2
Typical Residential Densities in Orang e
Medium Density Residential
(15-24 units/acre)
Low Medium Density Residential
(6-15 units/acre)
Estate and
Low Density Residential
(1-6 units/acre)
222

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-12
Figure LU-4
Floor Area Ratio Examples in Orange
Land Use Designations
The Land Use Element establishes 1 9 land use
designations. The land use designations have
been established to reflect: (1) development
trends affecting the City’s near and long -term
futures; (2) opportunity areas associated with
major institutional uses, shopping and
employment centers, and access to
transportation facilities; and (3) community
interests and desires expressed during the
General Plan update process. Four
designations are established for residential
development that allow for a range of housing
types and densities. Three mixed -use activity
center designations encourage creative mixes
of commercial retail, office, housing, civic , and
entertainment uses at key locations
throughout the City. Five commercial and
office designations and two industrial
designations provide for a range of revenue -
and employment -generating businesses. Five
public and semi -public use categories provide
locations for important public and private
facilities and institutions, including parks, open
space areas, resource lands, civic facilities,
hospitals, and educational institutions.

Table LU -1 presents descriptions of each
General Plan land use designation and the
corresponding range of density or intensity of
development permitted for each. The
maximum allowable development on any
individual parcel is governed by these
measures of density or intensity, with the
anticipated yield influenced by the physical
characteristics of a parcel, by access and
infrastructure issues, and by compatibility
considerations. The land use designations are
described here in terms of general land uses
and maximum densities or intensities
permitted. Corresponding zoning districts
specify the permitted uses for each category
as well as the applicable development
standards. The density or intensity maximums
outlined in Table LU -1 serve as development
caps. Actual development intensities are
expected to be lower than the caps, based on
223

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-13
market factors and past development trends. In order to estimate future build-out of the City and resulting impacts on the circulation system, expected levels of density and intensity have also been assumed, and are shown in Table LU -1. The City anticipates most development will occur at or below these expected levels, although on any single property, development up to the cap is allowed. However, any development proposed in excess of the expected levels indicated in Table LU -1 may be required to perform special studies to show the development’s ability to mitigate adverse impacts on adjacent properties and the citywide circulation system.

Density ranges are provided in Table LU -1 for each of the residential land use designations and the Urban Mixed Use designation, whereas only maximum densities are established for the Neighborhood Mixed Use and Old Towne Mixed Use designations. Similarly , FAR ranges are provided in Table LU -1 for several commercial, industrial, office , and mixed commercial/residential land uses, while others feature a maximum FAR value. In cases where a range is listed, the minimum value represents the least intense land use permitted within the area, while the maximum value represents the most intense land use permitted. For designations where only a maximum value is listed, no minimum is implied.

For mixed-use designations listed in Table LU -1, both densities (du/ac) and intensities (FAR) are established. The permitted dwelling units per acre should be interpreted to be contained within the maximum FAR expressed for each category.

Table LU-1
Land Use Designations
Land Use
Designation
Density or Intensity Description
Range Expected
Residential Designations
ESTR Estate Low
Density
Residential
0-2.0 du/ac 1.8 du/ac Large lot, single -family residential development in a rural or semi-rural setting. Private, noncommercial equestrian and agricultural uses may be allowed if associated with residential uses.

LDR Low Density
Residential

2.1-6.0 du/ac 5.0 du/ac Conventional single -family residential development characterized by individual single -family homes constructed in subdivisions, or by custom units built on individual lots.

LMDR Low Medium
Density
Residential

6.1-15.0 du/ac 8.0 du/ac Includes small lot or zero lot line single -family subdivisions, duplexes and mobile home parks, as well as lower intensity apartment and condominium complexes.

MDR Medium
Density
Residential

15.1-24.0 du/ac 16.3 du/ac Apartment and condominium or townhouse units in areas with ready access to major circulation routes, business districts and public open space areas. Typical developments may consist of two- or three-story buildings that house multiple dwelling units and provide some form of open space.

Mixed-Use Activity Center Designations
224

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-14
Table LU-1
Land Use Designations
Land Use
Designation
Density or Intensity Description
Range Expected
NMIX

Neighborhood
Mixed-use
Max. 24.0
du/ac;

1.0 - 1.5 FAR

16.3 du/ac;

1.0 FAR

Local- and neighborhood -supporting mixed -use activity centers and corridors. Commercial retail is encouraged to be the primary use on the ground floor. Professional office and housing uses are also encouraged, either integrated with a commercial use, or as separate, free -standing uses. Walkability and pedestrian access are key considerations. The lower end of the FAR range supports retail development, while the higher end supports a combination of uses including both commercial and office.

OTMIX Old Towne Mixed-use Local- and neighborhood -supporting mixed -use activity centers designed to be contextually appropriate within a historic area. Commercial retail is encouraged to be the primary use on the ground floor. Professional office and housing uses are also encouraged, particularly as adaptive reuse opportunities within existing structures. Transit - orientation, walkability, and pedestrian access are key considerations. The lower end of the FAR range supports retail development, while the higher end of the range supports a combination of uses including commercial and office.

Old Towne Mixed Use
15 Max. 15.0 du/ac;

0.5-1.0 FAR

8.0 du/ac;

1.0 FAR
Old Towne Mixed Use
24 Max. 24.0
du/ac;

1.0-1.5 FAR

16.3 du/ac;

1.5 FAR
Old Towne Mixed Use
Spoke

6.0 – 15.0 du/ac;
Max. 0.6 FAR

10.0 du/ac;

0.6 FAR
Local- and neighborhood -supporting mixed -use activity centers designed to be contextually appropriate within a historic area. Commercial retail is encouraged to be the primary use on the ground floor. Professional office and housing uses are also encouraged, particularly as adaptive reuse opportunities within existing structures. Transit - orientation, walkability, and pedestrian access are key considerations, as well as protection of the existing historic, residential-scale, and building character of the spoke streets outside of the downtown core . The lower end of the FAR range supports retail development, while the higher end of the range supports a combination of uses including commercial and office.

UMIX Urban Mixed -
use

30.0 – 60.0
du/ac;

1.5 - 3.0 FAR

48.0 du/ac;

1.7 FAR
Urban, high -intensity, regionally -oriented activity centers that define the character of surrounding areas and serve as
gateways to the City. This designation provides for integrated commercial retail, high -rise office, housing, and civic uses.

Commercial retail is intended to be the primary use on the ground floor. Convenient, high -frequency transit access, innovative housing options, and pedestrian -oriented design are key considerations.

Commercial and Office Designations
GC General
Commercial
Max. 1.0 FAR 0.35 FAR A wide range of retail and service commercial uses and professional offices. Regional shopping centers, mid -rise office projects, corridor shopping districts, and neighborhood corner stores are permitted uses.

RC Recreation
Commercial
Max. 0.35 FAR 0.18 FAR Outdoor commercial recreational uses which include, but not limited to: golf courses, marinas, boat rental buildings, staging areas, fishing facilities, and other commercial sports facilities. 225

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-15
Table LU-1
Land Use Designations
Land Use
Designation
Density or Intensity Description
Range Expected
NOP Neighborhood
Office
Professional
Max. 0.5 FAR 0.36 FAR Low-rise office and professional office park development.

Professional office is intended as the primary use. However, support retail and service commercial uses are also permitted as necessary to serve adjacent professional offices.

UOP Urban Office
Professional

1.5-3.0 FAR 1.5 FAR Urban, high -intensity, mid - and high -rise office centers.

Professional office is intended as the primary use. However, support retail and service commercial uses are also permitted as necessary to serve adjacent professional offices. Hospitals and supporting uses are also permitted.

YNCO Yorba North
Commercial
Overlay
Max. 1.0 FAR 0.35 FAR Allows for mixed uses compatible with a public facility or institutional use, such as a civic, college, or health care campus, including integrated retail, housing, office, and civic uses where a specific plan is approved for a public facility or institutional activity center. Innovative housing and
pedestrian-oriented deign are key considerations.

YSCO Yorba South
Commercial
Overlay
Max. 1.0 FAR 0.35 FAR A wide range of potential retail and service commercial uses, in conjunction with on -site parkland improvements, off -site parkland, and/or park improvements. Commercial use may
only be activated through a Development Agreement with the City that identifies specific parkland obligations.

Industrial Designations
LI Light Industrial Max. 1.0 FAR
3-story height
limit

0.50 FAR Allows for manufacturing, processing, and distribution of goods. Wholesale activities associated with industrial
operations, as well as small -scale, support retail, service commercial and office uses may also be established in areas with ready access to major circulation routes. A 3 -story building height limit applies within Light Industrial designated areas.

I Industrial Max. 0.75 FAR 0.65 FAR
Public Facilities and Open Space Designations
PFI Public Facilities and Institutions Provides for several types of public, quasi -public and institutional land uses, including schools, colleges and universities, City and County facilities, hospitals, and major utility easements and properties. Includes service
organizations and housing related to an institutional use, such as dormitories, employee housing, assisted living,
convalescent homes, and skilled nursing facilities.

Civic uses/Schools Max. 0.50 FAR
Cemeteries, Corporate yard, Water
towers, Southern California Electric
facilities
.05 FAR
Schools, Water Department facilities .15 FAR
Civic Center, Libraries, Police and Fire
Department facilities
.25 FAR
Institutions Max. 2.0 FAR
Colleges and Universities .35 FAR
Hospitals 1.0 FAR
OS Open Space NA NA Steep hillsides, creeks, or environmentally sensitive areas that should not be developed. Although designated as permanent open space, most areas will not be developed as public parks 226

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-16
Table LU-1
Land Use Designations
Land Use
Designation
Density or Intensity Description
Range Expected
with the exception of river and creekside areas that promote connectivity of the City’s trails system. Lands in this category include both privately held open spaces and public lands.

OS-P Open Space–
Park
NA NA Public lands used for passive and active recreation. Includes all parklands owned and maintained by the City of Orange, as well as parks operated by the County.

OS-R Open Space–
Ridgeline
NA NA Areas designated open space to preserve visually significant ridgelines identified on the Land Use Policy Map. No
development or grading is permitted.

RA Resource Area NA NA Allows for agricultural uses and continued use of stream and river channels for aggregate mining. Passive and active recreational uses are also permitted. May serve as a holding zone for future uses compatible with established and planned land uses in surrounding areas.

Residential Uses
Four residential categories allow for a variety of housing types representing the diverse residential character of Orange. The City will continue to preserve and enhance existing single-family residential neighborhoods. Older neighborhoods, characterized by higher densities, are located throughout the western part of the City. Lower density housing, typical of newer residential development, is located principally on the City’s eastern side.

Estate Low Density Residential
Density Range: 0-2.0 du/ac
The Estate Low Density Residential designation
provides for single -family detached, estate -style
homes on large lots, featuring a custom character
of development. Estate Low Density Residential
development is primarily found in Orange Park
Acres and other similar parts of east Orange.

Private, noncommercial equestrian and agricultural
uses may be allowed if they are associated with the
residential uses.
227

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-17

Low Density Residential
Density Range: 2.1-6.0 du/ac
The Low Density Residential designation provides
for typical single -family residential neighborhoods.

Low Density Residential uses make up the majority
of land uses in Orange, and are found throughout
the City in both older , established areas, such as
Old Towne, and newer development areas,
including east Orange.

Low Medium Density Residential
Density Range: 6.1-15.0 du/ac
The Low Medium Density Residential designation provides for both detached and attached single -family homes on smaller lots, as well as duplexes and some mobile homes, multi -family townhouses, condominiums , and apartments. Low Medium
Density residential uses are typically found adjacent to commercial or mixed -use activity centers, such as near South Main Street, Tustin Avenue , or El Modena. Low Medium Density residential uses are also found within newer development areas, such as Serrano Heights.

Medium Density Residential
Density Range: 15.1-24.0 du/ac

The Medium Density Residential
designation provides for multi -family
townhouses, condominiums, and
apartments featuring some form of
internal open space in areas with good
access to major circulation routes, business
districts, and public open space areas.

Medium Density residential uses are
typically found adjacent to commercial
districts, such as near Lincoln Avenue,
Katella Avenue, or La Veta Avenue.

Medium Density residential uses are also
found near major transportation corridors,
228

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-18
such as the Santa Fe Depot or freeway interchanges along Chapman Avenue, Tustin Street, or Glassell Street.

Mixed-Use Activity Centers
In response to the Vision and recent development trends, the General Plan provides three designations for mixed-use activity centers. All of these designations promote creative mixes of commercial retail, office, housing, civic , and entertainment uses that vary in composition and intensity based upon location, accessibility, and the surrounding development context.

Old Towne Mixed-use
Maximum Density: Old Towne Mixed Use Spoke: 15.0 du/ ac Old Towne Mixed Use 15: 15.0 du/ ac
Old Towne Mixed Use 24: 24.0 du/ac

Intensity Range: Old Towne Mixed Use Spoke: 0.6 FAR
Old Towne Mixed Use 15: 0.5-1.0 FAR
Old Towne Mixed Use 24: 1.0-1.5 FAR

The Old Towne mixed -use designations
provide for integrated commercial retail,
professional office, housing, and civic uses
designed to be contextually appropriate
within a historic area . These areas are
intended to be local - and neighborhood -
supporting activity centers and corridors.

Commercial retail is encouraged to be the
primary use on the ground floor.

Professional office and housing uses are
also encouraged, particularly as adaptive
reuse opportunities within historic
structures. Transit-orientation, w alkability,
and pedestrian access are key considerations , as well as protection of the existing historic, residential-scale, and building character of the Spoke Streets outside of the downtown core.

The lower end of the FAR range supports retail development, while the higher end of the range supports a combination of uses including commercial and office. Uses within this area are additionally subject to provisions of the Old Towne Design Standards Historic Preservation Design Standards for Old Towne and Santa Fe Depot Specific Plan, as applicable. 229

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-19

Neighborhood Mixed-use
Maximum Density:South Main Street: 24.0 du/ac
Intensity Range: 1.0-1.5 FAR
This land use designation provides for integrated commercial retail, professional office, housing, and civic uses along the South Main Street corridor. This area is intended to be a local- and neighborhood-supporting activity
center and corridor. Commercial retail is
encouraged to be the primary use on the
ground floor. Professional office and
housing uses are also encouraged, either
integrated with a commercial use, or as
separate, free -standing uses. Walkability
and pedestrian access are key
considerations. The lower end of the FAR
range supports retail development, while
the higher end of the range supports a
combination of commercial and office uses.

Urban Mixed-use
Density Range: 30.0-60.0 du/ac
Intensity Range: 1.5-3.0 FAR
This designation provides for integrated commercial
retail, professional office, housing , and civic uses
along West Katella Avenue, Town and Country Road,
and within Uptown Orange. These areas are intended
to provide for urban, high -intensity, regionally -
oriented activity centers that define the character of
surrounding areas. Commercial retail is intended to be
the primary use on the ground floor. Convenient
transit access, innovative housing options, and
pedestrian-oriented design are key considerations.

Commercial and Office Designations
The commercial and office categories consist of four designations that provide for a range of revenue- and employment-generating businesses.

General Commercial
Maximum Intensity: 1.0 FAR
The General Commercial designation provides for a wide range of retail and service commercial uses and professional offices.

This designation is found along many of the City’s most highly - traveled roadway corridors, including Katella Avenue, Chapman 230

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-20
Avenue, and Tustin Street. Regional shopping centers, mid - and high -rise office projects, corridor shopping districts, and neighborhood corner stores are all permitted uses.

Recreation Commercial
Maximum Intensity: 0.35 FAR
Recreation commercial uses provide for the operation
and development of resort or amusement oriented
commercial and recreational uses. The designation refers to recreational uses of regional interest that will draw visitors from throughout the City, Orange County, and
Southern California. The areas adjacent to the east and south sides of Irvine Lake in east Orange are proposed for this land use. Permitted uses include, but are not limited to, marinas, boat rental buildings , staging areas,
conference centers, golf courses, clubhouses, hotels,
resorts, restaurants, and other commercial sports facilities.

Neighborhood Office Professional
Maximum Intensity: 0.5 FAR
This land use designation provides for low -rise office and professional office park development in
appropriate areas throughout the City, including
portions of Chapman Avenue east of Old Towne and
portions of the La Veta Avenue corridor. The principal use in this designation is intended to be professional
offices; however, support retail and service
commercial uses are permitted as necessary to serve
adjacent professional office needs.

Urban Office Professional
Intensity Range: 1.5 – 3.0 FAR
231

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-21
The Urban Office Professional designation encourages urban, high-intensity, mid - and high -rise office centers located at the City’s edges, away from established single-family residential areas.

Urban Office Professional uses are located primarily north of the SR-22 Freeway and south of La Veta Avenue, concentrated around the hospital node at the southern end of Main Street. Professional office is intended as the primary use. However, support retail and service commercial uses are also permitted as necessary to serve adjacent professional offices. Hospitals and supporting uses are also permitted.

Yorba North Commercial Overlay
Maximum Intensity: 1.0 FAR
The Yorba North Commercial Overlay designation applies to the Chapman Hospital Global Medical Center (previously Chapman Hospital) site. This designation allows for mixed uses compatible with a public facility or institutional use, such as a civic, college, or health care campus, including integrated retail, housing, office, and civic uses where a specific plan is approved for a public facility or institutional activity center. Innovative housing and pedestrian-oriented design are key considerations.

Yorba South Commercial Overlay
Maximum Intensity: 1.0 FAR
The Yorba South Commercial Overlay designation applies to the current Yorba Park site near Chapman HospitalGlobal Medical Center , SR-55, and Chapman Avenue. This designation provides for a wide range of potential retail and service commercial uses, in conjunction with on-site parkland improvements, off -site parkland, and/or park improvements. Commercial use may only be activated through a Development Agreement with the City that identifies specific parkland obligations.

Industrial Designations
Two industrial land use designations provide locations for offices, manufacturing, warehousing, and distribution uses within the City. The principal difference between the designations is the permitted maximum intensity of development allowed within each area.

Permitted uses within industrial areas will continue to be primarily determined using the City’s Zoning Ordinance.

Light Industrial
Maximum Intensity: 1.0 FAR
Height Limit: 3 stories
The Light Industrial designation is intended for uses that are compatible with nearby commercial and residential districts and that do not produce substantial environmental 232

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-22
nuisances (noise, odor, dust , smoke, glare, etc.). This designation allows for manufacturing, processing, and distribution of goods. Light industrial uses are located primarily within areas west of Glassell Street and north of Walnut Avenue. Wholesale activities associated with industrial operations, as well as small -scale support retail, service commercial, and office uses may also be established in areas with ready access to major circulation routes. The maximum intensity permitted within the Light Industrial designation is 1.0 FAR, which is higher than that permitted within the Industrial designation. This distinction recognizes that ancillary office uses will be more prevalent in Light Industrial areas than within Industrial areas. A three-story height limit applies within the Light Industrial designation to maintain compatibility of scale with nearby commercial and residential districts.

Industrial
Maximum Intensity: 0.75 FAR
Industrial uses include manufacturing and
industrial activities that may lead to some
environmental nuisances that would be
incompatible with residential or commercial
uses. Industrial uses are located primarily in
areas west of Glassell Street and north of
Walnut Avenue. This designation allows for
manufacturing, processing , and distribution of
goods. Wholesale activities associated with industrial operations, as well as small -scale support retail, service commercial , and office uses may also be established in areas with ready access to major circulation routes. The maximum intensity permitted within the Industrial designation is 0.75 FAR.

Public Facilities and Open Space
Five designations for public facilities and open space areas allow for important public and private facilities and institutions, including parks, open space areas, resource lands, civic facilities, hospitals, and educational institutions.

Public Facilities and Institutions
Maximum Intensity: Civic uses, schools, and public facilities: 0.5 FAR Institutions: 2.0 FAR
The Public Facilities and Institutions designation provides for several types of public, quasi -public, and institutional land uses, including schools, colleges and universities, City and County government facilities, hospitals, and major
utility easements and properties. This designation also includes service organizations and housing related to an institutional use, such as dormitories, employee housing, 233

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-23
assisted living, convalescent homes, and skilled nursing facilities. The maximum permitted intensity for civic uses, schools , and public facilities is 0.5 FAR, whereas the maximum for institutions, such as universities and hospitals, is 2.0 FAR.

Open Space
The Open Space designation includes a substantial part of the eastern portion of Orange’s planning area. Much of this area includes steep hillsides or environmentally
sensitive areas that should be preserved. Although these areas may be designated as permanent open space, it is
not intended that they be developed as public parks.

Lands within this designation include both privately held open space lands and public lands.

Open Space Park
The Open Space Park designation refers to public lands
used for passive and active recreation. This includes all parklands owned and maintained by the City of Orange,
as well as parks operated by the County.

Open Space Ridgeline
The Open Space Ridgeline designation is designed to preserve visually significant ridgelines and steep hillsides. The City has adopted a hillside grading policy that prohibits development or grading on ridgelines with this designated land use.

Resource Area
The Resource Area designation provides for the continued use of areas for mining and agriculture. Passive and active recreational uses are also permitted in areas with this designation. Resource Areas also serve as a holding zone for areas that are currently used for mining and agriculture, but may not have these uses in the future. 234

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-24
Land Use Policy Map
The Land Use Policy Map (Figure LU -5) graphically represents the planned distribution and intensity of land use citywide. The colors shown on the map correspond to the land use designations described above.

General Plan Development Capacity
Table LU -2 identifies the development capacity associated with the planned distribution of land uses. Over time, as properties transition from one use to another or property owners rebuild, land uses and intensities will gradually shift to align with the intent of this Land Use Element. Table LU-2 summarizes the land use distribution, and the resultant residential and nonresidential levels of development that can be expected from full implementation of land use policies established by this General Plan. Given the largely built -out character of Orange and the good condition of most buildings, significant redevelopment activities may not occur over the life of this General Plan. However, within focus areas described in this Element, future land use changes are anticipated.

General Plan and Zoning Consistency
The Land Use Element is primarily implemented by the City’s Zoning Code, which specifies districts and performance standards for various types of land uses described in the Gen eral Plan. Table LU -3 indicates the corresponding zone district that applies to each General Plan land use designation. The zone districts specify the permitted uses for each category as well as applicable development standards. Zone districts specified in Table LU -3 for Mixed -use General Plan designations are new districts, and will be developed as part of the Zoning Code update implementing the General Plan.

Specific Plans and Neighborhood Plans in Orange
A specific plan is a detailed plan for the development of a particular area. Specific plans are intended to provide finite specification of the types of uses to be permitted, development standards (setbacks, heights, landscape, architecture, etc.), and circulation and infrastructure improvements that are only broadly defined by the General Plan. Specific plans are often used to ensure that multiple property owners and developers adhere to a single common development plan. Specific plans are also used as a means of achieving superior design by providing flexibility in development standards beyond those contained in the Zoning Ordinance.

The City has used Specific Plans and Neighborhood Plans as tools to achieve the coordinated development of individual parcels. Specific Plans and Neighborhood Plans currently in effect include:
▪ Archstone Gateway
▪ Chapman University
▪ East Orange Plan (1975)
▪ Immanuel Lutheran Church
▪ Orange Park Acres
235

LU-25 Figure LU-5 Land Use Policy Map
236

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-26

(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)

237

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-27
Table LU-2
General Plan Development Capacity
Land Use Designation
Acres Dwelling Units Non-Residential Square Feet (1,000s) Population Planning Area Total Sphere of Influence Planning Area Total Planning Area Total Planning Area Total City Unincorporated Unincorporated City Unincorporated City Unincorporated City Unincorporated Estate Low Density Residential 650 355 1,011 -- 1,181 639 1,819 -- -- -- 3,678 1,989 5,667 Low-Density Residential 5,599 814 6,413 -- 27,994 4,069 32,063 -- -- -- 87,203 12,674 99,877 Low-Medium Density Residential 1,298 54 1,356 -- 10,414 435 10,849 -- -- -- 32,439 1,357 33,796 Medium Density Residential 609 2 607 -- 9,863 29 9,892 -- -- -- 24,658 73 24,731 Old Towne Mixed Use
Old Towne Mixed Use Spoke 30 -- 31 -- 123 -- 123 403 -- 403 308 -- 308 Old Towne Mixed Use 15 49 1 50 -- 274 5 280 640 13 652 685 17 702 Old Towne Mixed Use 24 11 -- 11 -- 130 -- 130 224 -- 224 326 -- 326 Neighborhood Mixed Use 26 -- 26 -- 300 -- 300 343 -- 343 749 -- 749 Urban Mixed Use 426 -- 426 -- 10,223 -- 10,223 15,772 -- 15,772 25,558 -- 25,558 General Commercial 686 1 687 -- -- -- -- 10,465 11 10,476 -- -- -- Recreational Commercial 218 -- 218 -- -- -- -- 1,659 -- 1,659 -- -- -- Neighborhood Office Professional 58 -- 58 -- -- -- -- 897 -- 897 -- -- -- Urban Office Professional 28 -- 28 -- -- -- -- 1,823 -- 1,823 -- -- -- Light Industrial 936 -- 936 -- -- -- -- 20,381 -- 20,381 -- -- -- Industrial 184 -- 184 -- -- -- -- 5,220 -- 5,220 -- -- -- Public Facilities and Institutions
Public and Civic Facilities 568 9 577 -- -- -- -- 3,056 59 3,115 -- -- -- Institutions 332 -- 325 -- -- -- -- 9,035 -- 9,035 -- -- -- Open Space 6,646 -- 6,646 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Open Space-Park 573 1 574 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Open Space-Ridgeline 98 -- 98 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Resource Area 93 27 120 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Streets and Rights of Way 3,268 312 3,579 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Total 22,387 1,575 23,962 15,800 60,503 5,177 65,680 69,919 82 70,001 175,605 16,110 191,715 Note: Population estimates are based on average of 3.16 persons per single-family dwelling unit and 2.5 persons per multiple-family unit.

238

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-28

(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)

239

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-29
Table LU-3
Land Use / Zoning Consistency
Zoning
R1-5
R1-6
R1-7
R1-8
R1-10
R1-12
R1-15
R1-20
R1-40
R1-R
R2-6
R2-7
R2-8
R3
R4
MH
OP
CP
C-TR
C1
C2
C3*
CR*
OTMU-15(S)
OTMU-15
OTMU-24
NMU
UMU
M1
M2
A1
RO
SH
PI
SG
PC
FP-1
FP-2
A
E
P
Residential Designations
Estate Low Density Residential ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ Low-Density Residential ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ Low-Medium Density
Residential ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ Medium Density Residential ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ Mixed Use Activity Center Designations
Old Towne Mixed Use Spoke ⚫ ⚫ Old Towne Mixed Use 15 ⚫ ⚫ Old Towne Mixed Use 24 ⚫
Neighborhood Mixed Use ⚫
Urban Mixed Use ⚫ ⚫ ⚫
Commercial Designations
General Commercial ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ Recreation Commercial ⚫ Neighborhood Office
Professional ⚫ ⚫ ⚫
Urban Office Professional ⚫
Industrial Designations
Light Industrial ⚫
Industrial ⚫
Public Facilities and Open Space Designations
Public Facilities and Institutions ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ Open Space ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫
Open Space – Park ⚫ ⚫ Open Space – Ridgeline ⚫ ⚫ Resource Area ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ Overlay Districts
Yorba North Commercial** ⚫ ⚫ Yorba South Commercial*** ⚫ ⚫ *The C3 and CR zones were previously associated with the 1989 General Plan’s Commercial Recreation land use designation. The portion of the City with this land use designation has been re-designated Urban Mixed-use. This table will be updated upon adoption of future Zone Changes that address these designations. ** Overlay applies only to area generally north of Chapman Avenue, east and west of Yorba Street, south of Santiago Creek, and abutting the rear property line of parcels fronting Wheeler Street. *** Overlay applies only to area south of Chapman Avenue, west of Yorba Street, north of Palmyra Avenue, and east of Santiago Creek. 240

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-30

(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
241

LU-31 Figure LU-6 Land Use Focus Areas
242

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-32

(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
243

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-33
▪ Pinnacle at Uptown Orange
▪ St. John’s Lutheran Church
▪ Santa Fe Depot Area
▪ Serrano Heights
▪ Upper Peters Canyon
▪ Santiago Hills II
▪ Orange Olive
Each of these plans and any future specific plans adopted by the City must be consistent with the policies expressed in this Element. The City will continue to utilize specific plans to achieve development objectives consistent with the General Plan.

Land Use Focus Areas
Figure LU-6 identifies the following eight land use focus areas, which represent locations in the City where future land use change may occur.
(1) Chapman Avenue/Tustin Street
(2) Katella Avenue Corridor
(3) South Main Street Corridor
(4) West Chapman Avenue/Uptown Orange
(5) Old Towne and Santa Fe Depot
(6) Industrial Areas
(7) Lemon Street Corridor
(8) Eckhoff Street/Orangewood Avenue
Within portions of the City that do not lie within one of the identified focus areas, no significant land use changes are anticipated. For properties within the focus areas where uses established prior to adoption of this General Plan become non -conforming, the City recognizes these pre-existing conditions as legal. It is the City’s desire to allow these uses and the facilities in which they are located to continue until a change to the property is initiated by the property owner.

Each focus area has unique future development objectives, responding to priorities established in the Vision and input from the community. Providing additional community open space and facilitating use of transit and other alternative transportation modes are encouraged as a component of future development within many focus areas. Others focus areas maintain and enhance job growth, economic development, and affordable housing options within the City. For each area, the sections that follow provide a brief discussion of the recent planning context, a summary of each area’s market potential, and a description of the land use plan and future development objectives.

Chapman Avenue/Tustin Street
This focus area consists of residential, commercial, institutional, open space, and park uses surrounding the intersection of Chapman Avenue and Tustin Street. The focus area includes Chapman HospitalGlobal Medical Center (previously Chapman Hospital) , Yorba Park, and Santiago Creek. SR -55 passes through this focus area in a north -south direction, with an interchange at Chapman Avenue. Key considerations within this area include the continued 244

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-34
viability of commercial and institutional uses at the intersection of Chapman Avenue and Tustin Street, potential for more productive use of properties on both sides of Tustin Avenue from Chapman Avenue to La Veta Avenue, maintaining public access to Santiago Creek throughout the focus area, and the future use of the Yorba Park site east of the SR -55.

Although the Open Space –Park designation has not been changed on the Yorba Park site, the Yorba South Commercial Overlay has been applied to the park and the adjacent Orange Unified School District (OUSD) Education Center. The Yorba South Commercial Overlay designation provides for the future potential of the Yorba Park site to be used for commercial purposes that take advantage of its proximity to the SR -55 interchange. Any future commercial use of the Yorba Park site would require the City and potential developer to identify commensurate parkland and/or facilities per the terms of a Development Agreement.

This area is well -served by the SR -55 freeway, but is not a regional destination. Market studies completed for the General Plan update have concluded that this area is likely to develop as an office and professional service center. The Chapman Hospital Global Medical Center site includes continued hospital and medical office use. This focus area is located completely within the City’s Redevelopment Project Area, which can allow for ongoing revitalization and/or intensification of existing commercial uses. The Yorba North Commercial Overlay has been applied to the Chapman Hospital Global Medical Center site.

This Overlay designation provides for mixed uses compatible with a public facility or institutional use subject to approval of a specific plan. The integration of housing, small-scale commercial uses and pedestrian -orientated features in this area desirable given its relationship to existing neighborhood -serving commercial uses, the Santiago Creek Trail corridor, and Grijalva Park.

The land use plan for this focus area is based upon the following future development objectives, which are consistent with citywide Land Use Element policies and the Vision:
▪ Emphasize continued commercial and
multiple-family residential designations west
of SR-55.
▪ Promote viable open space recreation uses
of Grijalva Park, and Santiago Creek.
▪ Allow potential future commercial uses on
the Yorba Park and OUSD Education Center
sites in conjunction with on- or off-site
parkland improvements.
▪ Maintain hospital and medical office uses
near Chapman HospitalGlobal Medical
Center.

The plan maintains the Public Facilities and Institutions designation on the Chapman Hospital Global Medical Center site east of SR-55, allowing continued hospital and medical office uses.

Most currently commercial areas along Tustin Street are designated General Commercial to 245

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-35
provide for retail and service uses that support surrounding residential areas. Areas along Tustin Street approaching Santiago Creek are designated Low Medium and Medium Density Residential, allowing a combination of duplexes, mobile home parks, and apartments and condominiums. East of SR -55, an Open Space -Park designation is applied to Yorba Park and to Grijalva Park, located northeast of the Chapman Hospital Global Medical Center site. An Open Space designation surrounds much of Santiago Creek throughout the focus area. An additional Open Space area is located between Grijalva Community Park and Chapman HospitalGlobal Medical Center.

Katella Avenue Corridor
The Katella Avenue Corridor consists of properties located north and south of Katella Avenue between the Santa Ana River on the west and California Street on the east. The focus area also includes portions of Main Street between the Collins Channel and Katella Avenue, and portions of Struck Avenue between Katella Avenue and the Collins
Channel. West Katella serves as a gateway into the City from Anaheim and interfaces with the highly active area
surrounding The Pond Honda Center and Angel Stadium,
the Santa Ana River, and the Platinum Triangle. While the 246

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-36
West Katella corridor functions as a solid commercial district for the City, the westernmost portion of Katella Avenue has untapped potential due to its strategic location and under - utilized properties.

This western portion of this focus area is located within the City’s Redevelopment Project Area. The Katella Avenue Corridor includes a good variety of both retail and small office uses.

Its location at the midpoint of the City's industrial area provides service and support functions for these uses. The current Stadium Promenade site could maximize development potential to include mixed housing and retail uses that complement the current uses on the site.

Market studies completed for the General Plan update concluded that the western -most portion of this focus area could support mixed -use development, including housing at high densities. By employing this land use strategy, the City could encourage design of a signature development project on West Katella Avenue, serving as a gateway from the Platinum Triangle in Anaheim into the City of Orange.

The land use plan for this focus area is based upon the following future development objectives, which are consistent with citywide Land Use Element policies and the Vision statement:
247

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-37
▪ Establish an active, vibrant urban mixed-use residential gateway to the City featuring high-density residential uses.
▪ Capitalize on development of expanded entertainment uses and housing across the Santa Ana River in Anaheim.
▪ Enhance retail options and convenience throughout west Orange.

The land use plan features an Urban Mixed -use designation within the portion of the area between the Santa Ana River and Batavia Street, General Commercial and Industrial
between Batavia Street and Glassell Street, and General Commercial and Medium Density Residential uses between
Glassell Street and California Street. The Urban Mixed -use area is intended to be a regionally -oriented activity center, characterized by mid - to high -rise structures with uses that could include housing (30.0 to 60.0 du/ac), commercial retail uses, restaurants, offices, and civic uses. The General Commercial designation recognizes the contributions of the Katella Avenue corridor to the City’s overall retail sales base, and encourages some expansion and intensification of these uses, up to a maximum FAR of 1.0. Additionally, public input
regarding this area emphasizes the need to incorporate youth and teen activities within the uses; to improve the
appearance of Katella Avenue in the context of new
development, conveying the identity of a grand boulevard; and to gradually phase out strip commercial uses along
certain segments of the corridor. The Neighborhood Mixed -use designation allows local- and neighborhood-supporting mixed -use activity centers and corridors, which could include housing (at up to 15.0 du/ac). This designation maintains the commercial nature of the corridor with housing uses that help to transition into adjacent Low Density Residential designations.

South Main Street Corridor
The South Main Street Corridor includes the
Children’s Hospital of Orange County
(CHOC) and St. Joseph Hospital medical
centers on La Veta
Avenue, as well as
various commercial
and office uses on
Main Street between
La Veta Avenue and Chapman Avenue. Multiple-family residential apartments located west of Main Street and south of Chapman Avenue form a buffer between the Main Street corridor and single -family neighborhoods to the west. The South Main Street corridor also includes areas south of SR-22 along Town and Country Road , characterized by mid -rise office, senior housing, and commercial retail 248

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-38
uses.

Most of this focus area is located within the City’s Redevelopment Project Area. South Main Street serves as a key approach to the major medical hub created by CHOC and St. Joseph Hospital medical centers. These medical facilities have generated a spin -off demand for medical office space and other complementary uses that existing land use policies and parcel sizes do not easily accommodate. In recent years, new medical office buildings have been constructed on redeveloped sites, but many commercial properties remain that are incompatible with desired medical uses. The corridor also abuts established single- and multi- family neighborhoods, making expansion and intensification a challenge. Market studies completed for the General Plan update concluded that this area has good potential to provide for relatively high density housing and mixed-use development that supports current and future medical facilities in the area, while the Town and Country shopping center and Main Place regional mall in Santa Ana continue to provide nearby retail amenities.

The land use plan for this focus area is based upon the following future development objective, which is consistent with citywide Land Use Element policies and the Community Vision:
▪ Encourage compatible and integrated residential, commercial, and office uses. ▪ Promote development of a medical corridor that capitalizes on existing hospital and medical uses.
249

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-39

The plan encourages mid - to high -rise office,
medical, housing, and retail uses south of La
Veta Avenue . It applies the Urban Mixed -use
and Urban Office Professional designations to
properties along La Veta Avenue, Town and
Country Road, and Parker Street. Urban
Mixed-use areas south of SR-22 are intended
to provide for integrated commercial retail,
professional office, housing , and civic uses.

Commercial retail uses are intended to be the
primary use on the ground floor within these areas. Urban Office Professional areas north of SR-22 are intended to provide for urban, high -intensity, mid - and high -rise office centers.

Professional office is intended as the primary use. Both designations allow for a maximum allowable intensity of 3 .0 FAR within this area. A limited number of high -rise office and residential projects may also be permitted within this focus area through the use of transferable development rights.

The plan also features Neighborhood Mixed -use designations for portions of Main Street south of Almond Avenue. This designation encourages compatible and integrated residential, commercial, office, and medical uses, either as multiple -story projects with ground -floor retail, or as stand -alone projects with pedestrian connections to the arterial corridors. 250

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-40
Neighborhood-scale mixed -use at this location is intended to support the ongoing transformation of south Main Street into a medical corridor in a manner sensitive to surrounding single-family residential areas. On south Main Street, Neighborhood Mixed-use areas are permitted at a maximum density of 24.0 du/ac, and a maximum FAR of 1.5. In the Town and Country Road area south of SR -22, high intensity retail, office and housing development is encouraged within the Urban Mixed -use designation, which allows a maximum density of 60.0 du/ac, and a maximum FAR of 3.0. The General Commercial designation present at the intersection of Main Street and Chapman Avenue allows for a maximum development intensity of 1.0 FAR, to enable more productive use of retail properties near the intersection.

West Chapman Avenue/Uptown Orange
The West Chapman/Uptown Orange focus area consists of mostly commercial and industrial properties located west of SR-57, as well as commercial areas located along Anita Drive, just east of the Santa Ana River. In recent years, the City has experienced a high level of interest in sites available for redevelopment in Uptown Orange (generally bounded by SR-57 and State College Boulevard). Large multi-family developments have recently been constructed and property owners and developers remain interested in increased office, retail , and housing opportunities . Factors influencing redevelopment interest in this area include expansion of the University of California Irvine ( UCI) Medical Center, freeway accessibility, improvements at The Block Outlets at Orange, County government facilities located in the area, and the City of Anaheim’s Platinum Triangle Plan.

Uptown Orange is the most urban of the eight focus areas. It adjoins Anaheim, Garden Grove, and Santa Ana, where substantial higher -density development is already underway.

Uptown is well -served by freeways and contains a mix of major destination uses, including shopping, entertainment, offices, hotels, and a hospital. As a regional mixed -use node, Uptown should accommodate additional development intensity, including high-density multifamily residential development.

Market studies completed for the General Plan update concluded that Uptown Orange has the potential to complement similar residential/mixed -use development in surrounding cities. Existing and proposed retail/entertainment facilities at The Block the Outlets at Orange provide the atmosphere to create a live, work,
and play destination once higher -density residential units are introduced. This mixed-use development strategy and increased residential densities will require improved
transit access. Additionally, the presence of the Santa Ana River and associated regional bike trail along the eastern edge of the focus area provides great opportunity to
improve the community’s access to and relationship with the river, and to integrate access to and views of the river corridor in the design of mixed-use projects.

The land use plan for this focus area is based upon the following future development objectives, which are
consistent with citywide Land Use Element policies and the Vision Statement:
251

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-41
▪ Encourage integrated commercial retail, professional office, housing, and civic uses. ▪ Provide convenient transit access, innovative housing options, and pedestrian-oriented design.
▪ Require new development projects to provide community open space areas and retain or improve access to the Santa Ana River Trail.

The plan features an Urban Mixed-use designation for most of the focus area, which provides for integrated commercial retail, professional office, housing and civic uses. Convenient transit access, innovative housing options, and pedestrian-oriented design will be encouraged. High intensity retail, office and housing development is encouraged within the Urban Mixed-use designation, which allows a maximum density of 60.0 du/ac, and a maximum FAR of 3.0. A limited number of high-rise office and residential projects that exceed the maximum density or intensity may also be permitted within this focus area through the use of transferable development rights. New development projects in this area will be required to demonstrate provision of community open space areas, and, for projects adjacent to the Santa Ana River, to provide access to the River Trail when possible.

252

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-42
Old Towne and Santa Fe Depot
The Old
Towne
and Santa
Fe Depot
focus
area is
generally
bounded
by Walnut Avenue to the north, La Veta Avenue to
the south, Cambridge Street to the east, and Batavia Street to the west . U ses within Old Towne consist of a variety of commercial retail, service, restaurant, and office uses lining the Chapman Avenue and Glassell Street corridors; Hart, Plaza, and Depot Parks; industrial and warehouse buildings lining the Burlington Northern/Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway west of Glassell Street; several churches; Orange City Hall; the Orange Public Library & History Center; the Senior Center; much of the Chapman University campus; and numerous single -family and multiple-family residential units at varying densities.

Over the past several years, the City has taken steps to enable long -term preservation of historic properties in Old Towne, and in the process, has created one of California’s most intact and recognized historic districts. Today, strong interest exists among segments of the community to reduce overall residential densities in the Old Towne residential quadrants , and to make the areas surrounding the Santa Fe Depot more pedestrian friendly and transit - oriented.

The Santa Fe Depot and associated Metrolink station and OCTA Orange Transportation Center provide commuting options to people living and working in Orange. Opportunities for land use changes in this area arise because of its proximity to The Plaza and Chapman University, and due to the presence of Depot Park, under -utilized industrial properties , and surface parking lots. Land use changes could better integrate this area with its surroundings and could lead to more transit-oriented housing and creative re -use of historic industrial and commercial buildings.

Old Towne is the heart of the City, and the General Plan seeks to protect the small -scale fabric of the area, as well as the existing predominantly single -family neighborhoods that surround the Plaza. Residents in this “small town” district enjoy proximity to key quality -of- life amenities, such as restaurants, shopping, commuter rail services, and other public facilities. The area provides amenities that are compatible with and supportive of new mixed- use development, which may include small-scale office development, additional storefront retail, and new housing. Market studies completed for the General Plan update concluded that mixed-use designations in this area are more likely to build out as residential use than as non-residential use. Residential uses will in turn drive support for additional non -residential development.

The land use plan for this focus area is based upon the following future development objectives, which are consistent with citywide Land Use Element policies and the Vision statement:
253

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-43
▪ Reduce residential densities in many Old Towne neighborhoods. ▪ Continue to protect and enhance Old Towne’s historic character. ▪ Introduce neighborhood-scale mixed-use along Chapman Avenue and Glassell Street, and adjacent to the BNSF railroad.
▪ Encourage the adaptive re-use of existing industrial areas and the creation of transit- oriented developments around the historic Santa Fe Depot. ▪ Maintain and enhance Old Towne’s walkability.
▪ Provide for continued use and enhancement of the cCivic cCenter.

The plan features lower residential densities within the northeast, southwest and southeast quadrants of Old Towne, and introduces mixed -use within the historically industrial areas adjacent to the BNSF railroad. Low Density (maximum 6.0 du/ac) residential designations are applied to most current residential areas located east of Glassell Street. West of Glassell Street, a combination of Low, Low Medium, and Medium Density Residential designations are found, consistent with current development patterns. The intent of these designations is to ensure that infill development within Old Towne over time is consistent with the style, density, character, and intensity of the historic residential neighborhood character.

Two Old Towne Mixed-use designations with a maximum density of 15.0 du/ac surround the Plaza and line much of Chapman Avenue, Glassell Street, and the BNSF railroad corridor. One 254

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-44
of these is designed with a lower floor area ratio to maintain the historic residential character associated with the Spoke Streets. A higher-density Old Towne Mixed Use designation that allows up to 24.0 du/ac generally occurs along Olive Street , north and south of Chapman Avenue, and around Pixley Street. The higher -density designation supports future plans for transit-oriented development near the Metrolink station outlined within the Santa Fe Depot Specific Plan. The Old Towne Mixed Use designations encourage and support development up to the property lines in the downtown core and
Santa Fe Depot Specific Plan area in order to
maintain the historic streetscape and building
pattern that characterizes these portions of the
Old Towne area. Ground floor retail uses are
encouraged for most infill development projects,
which could be supported by residential or office
uses on subsequent stories. Stand alone
commercial, residential, or office projects may
also be appropriate, provided they do not
interrupt the historic streetscape. The Old Towne
Mixed-use designations also encourage the
adaptive re -use of the existing industrial areas,
and support improved walkability within the area.

Chapman University and the Orange Civic Center
are contained within the Public Facilities and
Institutions designation. The civic center includes
City Hall, the Orange Public Library & History
Center, the Chamber of Commerce, Fire
Department Station 1, St. John’s Lutheran School,
Emanuel Lutheran School, the Women’s Club, and
the Ainsworth House.

Industrial Areas
This focus area generally consists of properties located north of Orangewood Avenue/Walnut Avenue and west of the BNSF Railway. Portions of the area, including the Katella Avenue Corridor and the Orangewood/Eckhoff area, are also addressed in more detail in other focus areas. Orange’s industrial area is characterized by a broad mix of business park, office, manufacturing, warehousing and commercial uses. A limited number of single -family homes are located in the industrial area, mostly concentrated along Cully Drive.

The entirety of this focus area is located within the City’s Redevelopment Project Area. Over time, market forces may create demand for more office space or for more intense business park or warehouse uses than currently exist. Considering ways to increase the intensity of uses throughout the City’s industrial areas will encourage more productive use of limited land resources. Care must also be exercised to ensure adequate buffering between higher intensity industrial uses and surrounding residential areas to the north and east. Market studies completed for the General Plan update concluded that demand for industrial and office use in this area is strong, particularly among those who want to own their buildings. 255

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-45
Therefore, the City seeks to preserve the primary industrial land use found in this area and to encourage intensification and/or redevelopment of underutilized parcels.

The land use plan for this focus area is based on the following future development objectives, which are consistent with citywide Land Use Element policies and the Vision statement:
▪ Decrease the maximum allowed intensity within areas located west of Batavia Street and generally south of Grove Avenue to discourage professional office uses within this area in favor of true industrial uses.
▪ Provide room for expansion of current businesses and infill of vacant properties in remaining portions of this area by increasing the maximum allowed development intensity.
▪ Preserve the single-family residential character of the Cully Drive neighborhood.

The plan features Industrial land use designations west of Batavia Street and generally south of Grove Avenue. At these locations, the maximum allowed intensity is 0.75 FAR. The remaining portions of the industrial area are designated Light Industrial. In these areas, the maximum allowed intensity is 1.0 FAR with a three -story height limit to ensure a sensitive interface with nearby residential areas. These changes provide capacity for current businesses to expand, and enable more intensive uses to provide infill of currently vacant properties.

256

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-46
Properties on the east side of the Taft Avenue/Orange -Olive Road intersection are designated Medium Density Residential (permitting up to 24.0 du/ac). Additionally, to protect the integrity and character of the Cully Drive neighborhood, currently residential lots located on Cully Drive , east of Batavia Street , are designated for Low Density Residential u se, permitting up to 6.0 du/ac.

Lemon Street Corridor
The Lemon Street corridor is bounded by
Lemon Street on the east, the BNSF Railway on
the west, Hoover Avenue on the north, and
Collins Avenue on the south. The corridor
includes predominately industrial and office
uses and vacant lots. This corridor represents
an opportunity to redefine and improve the
industrial interface with single - and multi-family
residential uses to the east.

Market studies completed for the General Plan update indicate that developers have shown interest in providing residential uses within the Lemon Street corridor. This focus area is located in the City’s Redevelopment Project Area, and i It is likely that the Redevelopment 257

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-47
Agency will need to provide financial and lot assembly would be needed assistance in order to successfully transition this area to desirable residential development.

The land use plan for this focus area is based upon the following future development objective, which is consistent with citywide Land Use Element policies and the Vision statement:
▪ Establish a corridor of well-insulated, higher density residential uses, gradually transitioning, from west to east, into a single-family residential area.

The plan features a Medium Density Residential designation to the north of the focus area, allowing a maximum density of 24.0 du/ac and industrial in the southern two -thirds of the area. Future development in this area should also incorporate accessible open spaces for residents and workers and take advantage of opportunities for future trails parallel to the railroad tracks.
258

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-48
Eckhoff Street/Orangewood Avenue
This focus area encompasses the area
generally east of the Santa Ana River,
north of Orangewood Avenue, west of
Bitterbush Channel, and south of Collins
Channel. The focus area largely consists of
professional offices, commercial uses,
warehouses, and distribution centers. It
has historically been planned and zoned
for industrial use; however, over the years,
properties have been allowed to develop
as offices, and areas adjacent to the
offices have been allowed to develop as
industrial parks.

This focus area is located within the City’s
Redevelopment Project Area. As in the
City’s industrial area as a whole, demand
for industrial and office use in the Eckhoff
Street/Orangewood Avenue area has been
strong, particularly among those who
want to own their buildings. The City
seeks to encourage intensification and/or
redevelopment of underutilized parcels.

The land use plan for this focus area is
based on the following objectives for future development, which are consistent with citywide Land Use Element policies and the Community Vision:
▪ Recognize the potential of areas north of Orangewood Avenue to continue to provide options for lower-scale office uses and business-park oriented light industrial uses, as well as warehouse and distribution uses.
▪ Expand current neighborhood-scale office activities along Orangewood Avenue.

The plan supports an expansion of current neighborhood office uses along Orangewood Avenue and north of the Eckhoff Street intersection. All areas designated Light Industrial have a maximum allowable building intensity of 1.0 FAR and a 3 -story height limit. Properties designated for Neighborhood Office Professional use have a maximum allowable building intensity of 0.5 FAR.

259

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-49

Land Use Diversity and Balanced Development
A well-balanced community provides a broad range of housing and business opportunities as well as recreational, institutional , and cultural activities that enhance the overall living environment. By encouraging a mix of land uses, the City can create an active and diverse environment that complements all lifestyles and supports neighborhoods. A balanced inventory of land uses is needed to meet the housing needs of all income groups and lifestyles, to create a stable employment and tax base, to maintain logical relationships between land uses and community assets, and to provide residents with a range of recreational opportunities. Maintaining a variety of complementary land uses will continue to be a high priority for the City.

A key challenge that the City will face when reviewing future development is that newer areas of Orange (mostly located in the eastern portion of the City) and long-established areas of the City (mostly located in the western portion) have very different development and community service needs. Priorities in the City’s western area tend to be more established, focusing on reinvention of older commercial and industrial areas and on new opportunities to provide open space as part of infill development. This contrasts with priorities for east Orange, which is characterized by more recent suburban residential development. Here, providing adequate levels of roadway, utility infrastructure, and community services that are in step with new development and do not degrade service levels in other parts of the City is a key priority.
260

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-50
Mixed-use Development
As this Element has discussed, m ixed-use refers
to the mixing of compatible uses such as
residential, commercial, and office, which
increases the diversity of land uses within a given
area. Mixed-use developments create vital urban
areas that accommodate residents, employment,
retail, and amenities within walking distance .

Mixed-use will also activate neighborhoods
throughout the day , unlike single -use office
districts, for instance, that are often deserted at
night. Mixed-use buildings are often vertically
mixed, with commercial space on the first floor
and residential or office space above. Horizontal mixed -use is also desirable at some locations, allowing commercial to be adjacent to an office or residential use.

The Land Use Policy Map identifies multiple types of
mixed-use within the City. All of the mixed -use
designations encourage a creative blend of commercial
retail, office, housing, civic, and entertainment uses that may vary in composition and intensity based upon
location, accessibility, and the surrounding development context. Figure LU -7 identifies potential configurations of mixed-use, in both plan and elevation, which may be
found in Orange pursuant to the policies outlined in this Element. As shown in the figure, the style and intensity of mixed-use in Orange varies by location. For example, in areas designated for Urban Mixed-use, vertical mixed- use is encouraged, and mid -to-high rise buildings
reaching upwards of 10 or more stories may be allowed.

By contrast, in Neighborhood and Old Towne Mixed-use
areas, either horizontal or vertical mixed -use is
encouraged. Buildings tend not to exceed three stories, and they are designed to blend in with their surroundings. The City encourages this diversity of mixed -use development as a way of establishing vibrant activity centers, providing divers e housing opportunities, and encouraging walkable districts with convenient access to goods and services.

Transfer of Development Rights for Residential Development or Open Space
The City seeks to promote flexibility in future development of urban mixed -use environments, to encourage and support historic preservation within Old Towne, and to encourage expansion of open space opportunities in neighborhood scale mixed -use areas.

Transfers of development rights are encouraged for these four future development conditions, which are summarized in Table LU-4 and discussed below. 261

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-51
Table LU-4
Transfer of Development Rights Conditions
Purpose
Site Characteristics Maximum
Transferable
Unused FAR
(Receiver Site)
Other
Requirements Receiver Site Land
Use Designation(s)
Donor Site Land
Use Designation(s)
Provide for increased
levels of residential use at
appropriate sites.

Urban Mixed-use Urban Mixed-use 0.25 FAR Development
Agreement
Encourage development
of well-designed high rise
development consisting of
buildings 10 stories or
higher at identified
locations.

Urban Mixed-use Urban Mixed-use 1.0 FAR Development
Agreement

20 percent of receiver
site must be
developed as
permanent improved
open space
Expand and preserve open
space in Neighborhood
mixed-use environments
Neighborhood
Mixed-use
Neighborhood
Mixed-use

Old Towne Mixed-use
Variable
(determined by
Development
Agreement)
Development
Agreement
Encourage and support
historic preservation in Old
Towne mixed-use
environments.

Old Towne Mixed-use

Neighborhood
Mixed-use
Old Towne Mixed-use Variable
(determined by
Development
Agreement)
Development
Agreement

For properties within the Urban Mixed-use designation, (see Figure LU-8) allowable land uses include residential (at 30.0 to 60.0 du/ac) or commercial retail or office, or any combination of those uses that does not exceed a maximum FAR of 3.0. For properties with proposed commercial retail and/or office development that do not exceed the maximum FAR, any unused FAR on that donor site, up to a maximum 0.25 FAR of an identified receiver site, may be transferred to other Urban Mixed -use designated properties for the purpose of developing additional residential units on the property that receives the unused FAR. This approach to development is known as a transfer of development rights (TDR) and must be completed under a development agreement in accordance with City ordinances. This TDR technique is allowed in addition to density bonus provisions of State law (section 65915 of the California Government Code). Transfers of development rights from a donor site under this strategy may be limited to one receiver site, or may involve multiple receiver sites. 262
263

LU-51 Figure LU-7 Mixed-use Types

264

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-54

(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
265

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-53

Figure LU-8
Urban Mixed -use Sites Eligible for High Rise Development

To determine the number of residential units that can be added to the receiver property, unused FAR is converted to building floor area square footage; for example, 0.25 FAR for a receiver property of 10 acres in size is 108,900 square feet. The resulting square feet of building floor area is then divided by 1,000 square feet (the average size of a residential unit) to determine the number of additional residential units that can be added to the receiver property above and beyond the allowed 30.0-60.0 du/ac already allowed on that property. In this example, dividing 108,900 by 1,000 equals a maximum of 109 dwelling units that can be added to the receiver property, above and beyond the 300 -600 dwelling units already allowed.

For some properties within the Urban Mixed-use designation, the City desires well -designed high-rise development consisting of buildings 10 stories or higher. For any unused FAR, up to a maximum of 1.0 FAR of the receiving property may be transferred from other Urban Mixed- use designated properties, if proposed development on the receiving property results in the construction of a well designed high -rise building, and at least 20 percent of the property is developed as permanent improved, publicly accessible open space. 266

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-54
For properties in the Neighborhood Mixed -use designation, transfers of unused FAR are permitted and encouraged for the purpose of creating open space. Similarly, in the Old Towne Mixed -use designation, transfers of unused FAR are permitted to support historic preservation within the Old Towne neighborhood.

Industrial and Office Uses
Providing options for industrial development and office uses within the City contribute s to the economic and employment base of the community. A variety of industrial and warehouse facilities are located in the area north and south of the western end of Katella Avenue. Uses range from large beverage and grocery distributors, to masonry and foam manufacturers, down to small one-person printing operations. Office spaces that support industrial practices can also be found in this area.

Industrial development in Orange and throughout the region has undergone some transitions in recent years. Even though traditional manufacturing activities dominate these areas, in some cases warehousing uses and a few modern office parks are starting to replace manufacturing. In addition, Orange has experienced increased demand for larger, multi-story professional office complexes at locations such as South Main Street, Town and Country Road, La Veta Avenue, and The City Drive . Demand has also grown for medical office space surrounding local hospitals.

The Land Use Policy Map indicates a change in proposed land use designations directly west of the core of Old Towne , from Industrial to Old Towne Mixed-use. By changing the land use designation, the City is encouraging the adaptive reuse of several industrial sites to support walkability and transit presence in the area. The City continues to support industrial and office uses in areas currently characterized by these uses, and encourages a mixture of office, commercial, and residential uses in the area near the Old Towne core.

Contextual and Environmental Compatibility
The quality of the built and natural environments play s a large part in defining Orange’s quality of life. Land use conflicts often occur when newer development is allowed to occur that is insensitive to the use, scale, or character of current development and the surrounding environment. In other cases, older, obsolete and nonconforming uses remain , interspersed 267

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-55
among newer developments, as when old service stations or repair shops are located in the midst of residential development. Such conflicts can lead to degradation of the built environment. The City has ensured that all proposed land use designations in this Element are designed to complement and enhance adjacent and surrounding land uses and the natural environment.

Coordinated Planning
Future planning considers ongoing planning efforts of all City departments, agencies, surrounding jurisdictions and special districts. In addition, ongoing planning efforts undertaken by regional agencies such as the County of Orange, the Southern California Association of Governments, the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board , and others need to be examined for consistency with the City’s long-range objectives.

The following plans and programs, which are administered by federal, state, county, and special purpose agencies, will help achieve the goals of the Land Use Element. The City will continue to coordinate with the agencies responsible for administering these plans to ensure that City interests are considered and met.

National Pollutant Discharge and Elimination System
The City of Orange is under the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), which implements the National Pollutant Discharge and Elimination System (NPDES) permit for the northern and central portions of Orange County. The NPDES permit, a requirement under the Clean Water Act, addresses pollution from urban runoff that threatens water quality of receiving waters (such as streams and lakes). Under the NPDES permit, Orange must implement measures to reduce urban runoff during all phases of development: planning, construction, and existing use. Requirements include incorporating Best Management Practices to reduce runoff from construction and current uses, reporting any violations to the RWQCB, and education regarding the negative water quality impacts of urban runoff.

California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was adopted by the state legislature in response to a public mandate for more thorough environmental analysis of projects that might affect the environment. Provisions of the law and environmental review procedures are described in the CEQA Statutes, State CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s guidelines implementing CEQA. Implementation of CEQA ensures that during the decision making stage of development, City officials and the general public will be able to assess the environmental impacts associated with private and public development projects.

Southern California Association of Governments Growth
Management Plan
The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Growth Management Plan recommends methods to redirect regional growth to minimize traffic congestion and better protect environmental quality. The goa ls of the Growth Management Plan include balancing 268

LAND USE

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
LU-56
jobs and housing. While SCAG has no authority to mandate implementation of the Growth Management Plan, principal goals have implications for the land use composition of Orange.

LAND USE IMPLEMENTATION
The goals, policies and plans identified in this Element are implemented through a variety of City plans, ordinances, development requirements, capital improvements, and ongoing collaboration with regional agencies and neighboring jurisdictions. Specific implementation measures for this Element are contained in the General Plan Appendix.

269

CIRCULATION
& MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-1
REV. GPA 2014-0001 (12/8/15)
Rev. GPA 2010-0001 (8/10/10)

INTRODUCTION AND VISION FOR THE FUTURE
Orange’s circulation system has been influenced by a variety of historical factors, including the presence of the Santa Fe Railroad, the vision of Alfred B. Chapman and William T. Glassell, the agricultural history of the area, and alternative transportation modes including a historic streetcar system.

In 1887, the Santa Fe Railroad came to Orange and built a station four blocks west of the Plaza. The coming of the railroad set off a real estate boom that brought hundreds of settlers to the area. The railroad also influence d the City’s early economic success by providing a means to transport goods, especially citrus, to the entire country. Today, the railroad tracks continue to serve freight trains and provide a critical link to the region via the Metrolink heavy rail transit system.

In the 1870s, Alfred B. Chapman and William T. Glassell subdivided their land into residential and small farm lots centered on a roundabout known today as Plaza Park. Plaza Park was dedicated in 1886 and established the City’s two main streets – Chapman Avenue and Glassell Street – as well as the compact street grid of Old Towne Orange. The street grid and railroad system were supported historically by a streetcar system that connected the small towns and settlements that make up the City today.

Over time, the small farms on the outer edges of Orange’s core district began to disappear.

Two factors influenced this change: the demand for housing after World War II and the appearance of “Quick Decline” disease that destroyed the local citrus industry. As each farm was developed independently, the grid system expanded outward and commercial corridors were established . Orange’s roadways began to take on a more suburban pattern of collectors, connectors, and arterials. As development reached the eastern portion of the City, the grid gave way to curvilinear street patterns.

The historic roadways and railways that form the basis for the current circulation network have been complemented over the years by the development of a streetcar system, a transit service, an emerging and continually expanding bicycle trail and route network, and routes for equestrian use in the eastern portion of the City. The City will continue to be served by these multiple modes of transportation and other emerging mobility technologies.

270

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-2

Orange’s Vision for the Future , described in the General Plan Introduction, recognizes that the circulation system is a key component of the quality of life in the City . Accordingly, the vision includes the following objectives:
▪ Residential areas will be connected to commercial, recreational, and open space areas, as well as educational and cultural facilities via a balanced, multi -modal circulation network that accommodates vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, hikers, and equestrians. This network will create additional opportunities for walking and biking, enhancing safety and well - being for neighborhoods and businesses.
▪ The City will work to define neighborhoods through the use of open space areas and a trail system that provides a source of aesthetic beauty and recreational opportunities.

These open space areas support a healthy and active community. ▪ We will develop a connected multi-modal network for traveling from one end of town to the other that provides the option for residents from different neighborhoods to access parks, open spaces, and scenic areas by vehicle, transit, foot, bicycle or, where appropriate, horse.

Purpose of the Circulation & Mobility Element
California’s General Plan Guidelines mandate that the Circulation & Mobility Element fulfill the following objectives:
▪ Show a direct relationship to the Land Use Element to ensure that any changes to land use as stated by the Land Use Element and growth occur with adequate circulation and transportation facilities in mind.
▪ Address relevant issues including the adequacy of “major thoroughfares, transportation routes, terminals, other local public utilities and facilities.” The goal of the Circulation & Mobility Element is to identify circulation problems related to these facilities in the early stages and resolve them in local goals and policies without costly delays.

Other relevant issues discussed in the Circulation & Mobility Element include those that address streets, highways, public transit routes, railroads, bicycle and pedestrian routes, recreational trails, paratransit, parking, transportation system management, and air pollution. The hierarchy of streets within the residential areas helps to frame the urban form.

Connections between neighborhoods can b e achieved by a comprehensive network of sidewalks and trails. Also, the commercial corridors can be enhanced with adequate street capacity, public transit, and pedestrian-friendly environments.

The state also recommends that the Circulation & Mobility Element address coordination efforts among the local, regional, and state transportation plans to better resolve circulation issues. Since many transportation concerns are regional, addressing them requires intergovernmental and regional transportation management plans and policy implementation. These partnerships ensure the most efficient use of funding, infrastructure , and other resources. The state also recommends the “preservation of transportation corridors for future system improvements.”
271

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-3
The Circulation & Mobility Element prioritizes the issues and opportunities that exist within Orange’s transit network. It is directly responsive to proposed changes in land use and anticipates the impacts of those changes. This Element also seeks to reassure residents and businesses that the City recognizes the link between transportation and land uses , and provides a means to mitigate the impacts of growth.

Another goal of the Circulation & Mobility Element is to increase transportation options and provide increased access to the circulation system for all residents of Orange . This goal includes improved rail and bus transit connections and frequency, implementation of a Bikeway Master Plan , and completion of a trails system. Transforming many of Orange’s historically auto-oriented commercial corridors , such as Katella Avenue, Main Street, and portions of La Veta Avenue, Chapman Avenue, and Glassell Street into more pedestrian- friendly mixed-use environments is an overarching goal. Where possible, the development of equestrian trails is also encouraged.

One of the main functions of the Circulation & Mobility Element is to guide and direct enhancement of the current circulation system for existing and future developments. Thus, circulation provisions correlate with the Land Use Element to avoid unchecked growth and unnecessary congestion.

Another key objective of the Element is to work toward a future circulation network that provides meaningful alternatives for getting around the community by less auto -dependent means. The City’s topography, street and sidewalk system, transit and trail framework, and land use relationships provide an excellent foundation for pursuit of this objective.

The Circulation & Mobility Element does not simply determine automobile routes . It also guides the movement of people and goods , directly affecting Orange’s physical, social, and economic environment. Since circulation permits accessibility to places and social amenities, it can either improve or cause deterioration in quality of life. Circulation efficiency also plays a major role in progress and development of the City’s economy.

Scope and Content of the Circulation & Mobility Element The Circulation & Mobility Element comprises three sections:
(1) Introduction;
(2) Issues, Goals, and Policies; and
(3) The Circulation & Mobility Plan.

The first section introduces the contents of the Circulation & Mobility Element. The second section presents issues, goals , and policies for improving circulation. The third section includes the Circulation & Mobility Plan , which designates locations and standards for roadways and non -motorized circulation facilities, and states the community’s desired level of transportation service.

Implementation measures designed to promote achievement of the goals and policies are provided in an Appendix to the General Plan.
272

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-4
Relationship to other General Plan Elements
California planning law requires that the Circulation & Mobility Element correlate and maintain consistency with the other General Plan elements. The Circulation & Mobility Element relates most closely to the Land Use, Natural Resources, Noise , Economic Development, Housing, and Urban Design Elements.

The Circulation & Mobility Element is linked to the Land Use Element because the General Plan land use designations identified in the Land Use Element serve as a basis for the allocation of vehicle trips and establishment of capacity levels for circulation planning. The Land Use Element also provides land use designations that accommodate mixed commercial and residential development, which encourage shorter trips and improve the efficiency of the transportation network. The Circulation & Mobility Plan is established to define and provide for adequate levels of service and facilities to support future land uses. This Element recommends roadway and intersection improvements that may require land acquisition.

Location of public transportation facilities will also influence pedestrian activity and transit - oriented development, and the physical size of streets will affect urban land use s and the physical appearance of the City.

The Natural Resources Element identifies regional air quality objectives and provides appropriate mitigation efforts that affect the Circulation & Mobility Element. Improving access, encouraging alternative modes of travel, and maintaining air quality and conservation standards are common objectives of the Natural Resources and the Circulation & Mobility Elements.

The Noise Element addresses future noise levels associated with roadways, rail, and other transportation facilities. Future volumes of traffic on the circulation system are directly related to future noise levels and mitigation strategies.

The Economic Development Element identifies desirable economic conditions and land uses that enhance and promote business activity, employment growth, and economic stability.

The goals and policies of the Circulation & Mobility Element will determine road capacity in Orange, which will impact the type and location of uses , and parking and access considerations associated with future uses . Both elements share a common objective of planning for future transportation infrastructure needs. Maintaining roadways, bikeways and bus and rail transit facilities is critical to the success of both current and future businesses in Orange.

The Urban Design Element is a framework for shaping the future form and character of Orange. The quality of Orange’s physical environment contributes to its identity, attracts new residents, and sets the stage for economic activity. The Urban Design Element builds on the foundation of Orange’s already strong sense of place to preserve and strengthen the streetscape environment of commercial corridors and landmarks within the city . The Urban Design Element and Circulation & Mobility Element share a common objective to reinvent City streets as more functional and walkable public places.

273

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-5

ISSUES, GOALS, AND POLICIES
The goals, policies, and implementation programs of the Circulation & Mobility Element seek to achieve a better balance between vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle travel, and to provide a wide range of viable transportation options to Orange residents. The following six issues are addressed: (1) enhancing the local circulation system; (2) maintaining the regional circulation system; (3) maintaining a viable public transportation network; (4) creating a comprehensive system of sidewalks, trails , and bikeways; (5) providing adequate parking facilities; and (6) improving circulation system aesthetics and safety.

Local Circulation System
The local roadway system serves the community’s primary needs for mobility and access, and consists of a hierarchy of City streets to meet those needs. The City’s original street system was established as a grid pattern long before a Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) was adopted. The Old Towne area and many postwar neighborhoods were designed in a classic grid configuration, while in newer parts of the City, physical features such as the Santa Ana River, Santiago Creek, hilly terrain, freeways and the presence of the City of Villa Park have resulted in a system without a definitive pattern. Some major roads do not connect the eastern and western portions of the City and consequently do not provide effective through circulation. A well -designed roadway system will provide convenient access to activities in Orange.

GOAL 1.0: Provide a safe, efficient, and comprehensive circulation system that serves local needs, meets forecasted demands, and sustains quality of life in neighborhoods.

Policy 1.1: Plan, build, and maintain an integrated, hierarchical , and multi-modal system of roadways, pedestrian walkways, and bicycle paths throughout the City.

Policy 1.2: Identify key intersections and streets with historical or projected traffic congestion problems and apply creative traffic management measures to improve overall circulation.

Policy 1.3: Consider various methods to increase safety on City arterials and neighborhood streets, including landscaping, provision of bike/transit lanes, and consideration of traffic calming on neighborhood streets in accordance with the City’s Neighborhood Residential Traffic Management Program.

Policy 1.4: Prohibit on -street parking where possible to reduce bicycle/automobile conflicts in appropriate target areas as recommended by the Bikeways Master Plan.

Policy 1.5: Address possible safety and noise effects of increased rail activity on grade crossings throughout the City.

Policy 1.6: Maintain and repair roadways and sidewalks as necessary to improve circulation and safety.

Policy 1.7: Consolidate d riveways along roadways that provide access to commercial uses to minimize side street interruption and promote smooth traffic flows. 274

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-6
On-street parking is prohibited on commercial access streets to provide adequate curb-to-curb width for travel lanes.

Regional Circulation System
Mobility in Orange is directly related to the regional transportation network, as the City lies at the confluence of several regional freeways: the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5), Orange Freeway (State Route [SR] 57), Garden Grove Freeway ( SR-22), Costa Mesa Freeway ( SR-55), Riverside Freeway ( SR-91) and Eastern Transportation Corridor ( SR-241). In addition to the freeways, other connections to the region include the commuter rail system known as Metrolink, a freight and goods rail transport system, and a regional bikeways system with connections to the Santa Ana River and other locations. Orange is also connected to the region via the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) bus system. City infrastructure must accommodate regional through traffic originating in other communities in addition to providing local residents access to the regional network.

GOAL 2.0: Provide an effective regional transportation network.

Policy 2.1: Ensure consistency with the County MPAH in order to qualify for funding programs.

Policy 2.2: Coordinate with adjacent cities to plan and develop major east/west and north/south arterials and rapid transit to connect the City with the cities of Anaheim, Tustin, Santa Ana, Garden Grove, and Villa Park, as well as developing areas within the City’s sphere of influence.

Policy 2.3: Cooperate with and support local and regional agencies’ efforts to improve regional arterials and transit in order to address increasing traffic congestion.

Policy 2.4: Coordinate land use planning with anticipated future development of roadways and other transportation facility improvements as well as the expansion of commuter rail and bus service.

Policy 2.5: Ensure that transportation facilities and improvements do not degrade the quality of Orange’s commercial and residential areas.

Policy 2.6: Encourage the use of regional rail, transit, bicycling, carpools , and vanpools for work trips to relieve traffic congestion.

Policy 2.7: Continue to support the use of rail corridors within the City for the movement of freight and goods, and work with rail operators to minimize associated traffic delays.

Public Transportation
Public transportation is a crucial component of a comprehensive circulation system. In addition to reducing air pollution and traffic congestion, a successful public transit system provides an alternative mode of travel for those with limited mobility, residents who may not have access to a car, and persons who choose not to drive.

GOAL 3.0: Connect centers within the City to each other and to the region through efficient and accessible public transportation.
275

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-7
Policy 3.1: Work with OCTA and other agencies to assess City public transportation needs and to ensure delivery of services when and where they are needed.

Policy 3.2: Enhance and encourage provision of convenient and attractive transit amenities and streetscapes to encourage use of public transportation (e.g. , benches, trash cans, shelters, and lighting).

Policy 3.3: Require incorporation of transit -oriented design features within major commercial and employment areas as well as in medium density residential and mixed-use development areas.

Sidewalks, Trails, and Bikeways
In addition to offering recreational and public health benefits, non -vehicular modes of transportation offer commuting options. Also, the mixed -use environments advocated by Land Use Element policies will encourage increased pedestrian activity on City sidewalks for both business and pleasure. An effective pedestrian, bicycle , and equestrian network must be safe and accessible, and must connect key activity centers within the City with each other and with the regional trail system. A comprehensive network of on -street bicycle lanes, off - street bicycle paths, sidewalks, and trails should be developed and maintained to increase the safety and utility of the system , with a particular focus on the City’s sidewalk deficient industrial areas
GOAL 4.0: Provide efficient and accessible modes of pedestrian , bicycle, and equestrian transportation and improved facilities and amenities.

Policy 4.1: Create a comprehensive bicycle network that is integrated with other transportation systems by establishing complementary on -street and off - street facilities as identified in the City of Orange Bikeways Master Plan and OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan , including Santiago Creek, the Santa Ana River, and the Tustin Branch Trail.

Policy 4.2: Install racks and safe storage facilities at parking areas for City facilities, as appropriate, and encourage incorporation of such facilities within privately - developed projects.

Policy 4.3: Improve citywide awareness of automobile and bicycle safety.

Policy 4.4: Encourage use of the bikeway system by providing adequate signage, trail markings, and other amenities.

Policy 4.5: Ensure that pedestrian sidewalks, trails , and bikeways are safe environments through the use of crime prevention -oriented trail design features, lighting where appropriate, pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements at at -grade rail crossings, access for emergency vehicles, and links to the roadway signal system.

Policy 4.6: Explore opportunities to convert abandoned rail corridors into segments of the City’s bikeway and pedestrian trail system.

Policy 4.7: Provide ADA accessible sidewalks and pedestrian amenities throughout the City.
276

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-8
Policy 4.8: Expand and maintain an equestrian trail network and provide for appropriate staging areas and infrastructure.

Parking Facilities
A shortage of parking can cause circulation problems and could lead to a reduction or loss of business activity. Old Towne Orange has been identified as an area of particular concern. As the City develops, providing adequate parking adjacent to other activity centers is increasingly important.

GOAL 5.0: Provide adequate parking to meet the needs of activity centers throughout the City.

Policy 5.1: Provide adequate parking to protect and support the economic vitality and diversity of Old Towne.

Policy 5.2: Plan for and design parking facilities throughout the City that are adequate to meet demand, but also consider land use -parking efficiencies, and the surrounding natural and built environment.

Policy 5.3: Encourage adjacent businesses to consolidate parking facilities and access points.

Policy 5.4: Encourage well-designed structured parking in commercial areas where such features would be economically feasible , safe, and visually integrated with existing development.

Circulation System Aesthetics
Streets that have been made or modified to include visual and pedestrian amenities can improve the overall look and feel of City streets, as well as enhancing functionality for all users. As major commercial corridors are beautified and changed to include a pleasant pedestrian environment, this will have positive effects on the feelings of safety and security for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists.

GOAL 6.0: Provide roadway corridors that are aesthetically pleasing and contribute to a feeling of safety, security, and comfort for motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians.

Policy 6.1: Supply adequate, clear, and correctly placed signage to direct both motorists and non-motorists toward destinations and away from hazards.

Policy 6.2: Provide clear indicators in the right -of-way for where pedestrians and bicyclists are encouraged to walk, bike, or cross safely. These may include special paving, line stripes, and crosswalks.

Policy 6.3: Provide lighting , landscaping, street trees, and other appropriately scaled streetscape features that accommodate all users on commercial corridors.

Where appropriate, lighting should be scaled for autos as well as pedestrians. 277

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-9

CIRCULATION & MOBILITY PLAN
The objective of the Circulation & Mobility Plan is to document existing transportation facilities in the planning area used for the movement of people and goods. The Element addresses the desired future condition of these facilities, and their relationship to future land uses identified in the Land Use Element. The Plan describes the circulation system, including the arterial network and intersections, the public transit system, bicycle paths, recreation facilities, parking, and railroad operations. The City’s circulation network includes an extensive system of roadways, bus transit service, commuter rail, and freight rail.

Local Circulation System
A well -designed local arterial roadway system that connects to a well -developed regional circulation system provides safe and convenient access to employment, housing, recreation , and commercial areas in Orange. City arterial roadways located on the western side of SR-55 generally follow north-south and east-west orientations. On the eastern side of the freeway, arterials are characterized by curvilinear streets due to undulating geographical surroundings. Key north-south arterials include Tustin Street, Glassell Street, Main Street, and The City Drive. Key east -west arterials include Chapman Avenue, Katella Avenue, Taft Avenue, and parts of La Veta Avenue. These arterial roadways are in turn supported by a network of collector and local streets that provide access to homes and businesses throughout the City.

Roadway Classification System
The City’s roadway network is distinguished by a hierarchical classification system that differentiates roads by size, function, and approximate daily capacity based upon Level of Service D ( LOS D ). LOS is a qualitative measure that characterizes traffic congestion on a scale of A to F with LOS A representing a free-flow condition and LOS F representing extreme congestion. LOS standards can apply to either intersections or links (a section of street between two intersections). Generally speaking, LOS represents the ability of a roadway or an intersection to accommodate traffic.

In the City, i ntersections are used as actual control points. City roadways consist of both divided and undivided roadways. Divided roadways generally contain a physical barrier or buffer, such as a raised median or a continuous two -way left turn lane , between each direction of travel. Divided roadways remove vehicles making a left turn from the travel lanes so as not to impede through traffic and constrict roadway capacity. Undivided roadways do not contain a buffer between each direction of travel, and therefore left-turning traffic can impede through traffic. Undivided roadways may provide turn movement pockets at intersections. The six categories of roadways in Orange are summarized in Table CM -1.

Proposed cross-sections for each type of roadway are shown in Figure CM-1.

The City’s policy is to use a link capacity standard of LOS D. The following paragraphs represent link capacities of each roadway type at LOS D.

278

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-10

Smart Streets are typically four - to eight -lane roadways with enhanced capacity and smoother traffic flow than standard arterial streets. These streets have enhanced features such as traffic signal synchronization, bus bays, intersection improvements, and the addition of travel lanes by removing on -street parking and consolidating driveways. The traffic carrying capacities of Smart Streets can range from 60,000 to 79,000 vehicles per day, depending on the number of lanes, degree of access control, peak period loading, and the configurations of major intersections.

Principal Arterials are typically eight-lane divided roadways with medians or continuous two- way left turn lanes. They can accommodate up to 67,500 vehicles on an average weekday at LOS D conditions, depending on the degree of access control, peak period traffic loadings, and lane configurations at major intersections. Principal arterials prohibit on -street, curbside parking, and connect directly to freeways.

Major Arterials are six-lane divided roadways with medians or continuous two -way left turn lanes. They can accommodate up to 50,700 vehicles on an average weekday at LOS D conditions, depending on the degree of access control, peak period traffic loadings, and lane configurations at major intersections. Major arterials facilitate traffic circulation within Orange, and also may prohibit on-street, curbside parking.

Primary Arterials are four-lane divided roadways with medians or continuous two-way left turn lanes. They can accommodate up to 33,750 vehicles on an average weekday at LOS D conditions, depending on the degree of access control and peak period loadings. Primary Arterials provide for easy circulation in the City, and allow for limited on -street, curbside parking.

Secondary Arterials are four -lane undivided roadways without medians. They can accommodate up to 21,600 vehicles on an average weekday at LOS D conditions, depending on the degree of access control and peak period loadings. Secondary arterials allow for on - street, curbside parking.

Table CM-1
Roadway Classifications
Classification Facility Type Characteristics
Smart Street Smart Street 4-8 lane divided, with possible signal coordination, intersection capacity improvements and/or grade separations
Principal Arterial 8 Lane Divided Primarily serves through traffic with limited local access Major Arterial 6 Lane Divided Serves mostly through traffic with some local access allowed Primary Arterial 4 Lane Divided Serves through and local traffic Secondary Arterial 4 Lane Undivided Serves through and local traffic Collector Street 2 Lane Serves mostly local traffic
279

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-11

Figure CM-1
Roadway Cross Sections
280

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-12
Collector Streets are typically two-lane roadways without medians that gather and distribute traffic to higher-capacity arterials. They can accommodate up to 10,800 vehicles per average weekday at LOS D conditions, depending on the degree of access control and peak period traffic loadings. Centerline striping is typically not provided on collector streets, and on-street parking is allowed. There are several types of two -lane streets in the City, including divided, undivided, residential, and collector streets. Each type serves a slightly different purpose and may have different capacity thresholds based on various factors.

Performance Criteria
Evaluating the ability of the circulation system to serve residents and businesses in Orange requires establishing performance criteria. Performance criteria have a policy component that establishes a desired LOS, and a technical component that specifies how traffic forecast data can be used to measure criteria achievement.

The LOS definition for intersections is based on a volume -to-capacity (V/C) ratio and provides a more quantitative description of traffic conditions. Table CM -2 presents LOS based on traffic volumes and the design capacity of intersections.

Table CM-2
Level of Service Definitions for Intersections
Level of
Service
Volume-to-Capacity
Ratio Description
A 0.00-0.60 Free Flow/Insignificant Delays: No approach phase is fully utilized by traffic and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication.

B 0.61-0.70 Stable Operation/Minimal Delays: An occasional approach phase is fully utilized. Many drivers feel somewhat restricted within platoons of vehicles.

C 0.71-0.80 Stable Operation/Acceptable Delays: Major approach phases fully utilized.

Most drivers feel somewhat restricted.

D 0.81-0.90 Approaching Unstable/Tolerable Delays: Drivers may have to wait through more than one red signal indication. Queues may develop but dissipate rapidly, without excessive delays.

E 0.91-1.00 Unstable Operation/Significant Delays: Volumes at or near capacity. Vehicles may wait through several signal cycles. Long queues form upstream from intersection.

F N/A Forced Flow/Excessive Delays: Represents jammed conditions. Intersection operates below capacity with low volumes. Queues may block upstream intersections.

Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, Special Report No. 209, Washington DC, 2000.

Although roadway capacity is generally a function of peak hour intersection performance and the corresponding peak hour volumes, daily arterial segment capacities (link capacities) also provide a measure of the overall LOS of the arterial system. Generally, traffic impact mitigation focuses on peak hour intersection performance, since system performance is typically a function of intersection performance. The City’s policy is to use a link capacity standard of LOS D. Table CM-3 presents arterial daily capacities at LOS D and LOS E. 281

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-13
Table CM-3
Arterial Daily Capacity Threshold Assumptions
Street Type
Daily Capacity

LOS D LOS E
Smart Street – 6- to 8-lane divided 71,100 79,000
Principal – 8-lane divided 67,500 75,000
Major – 6-lane divided 50,700 56,300
Primary – 4-lane divided 33,750 37,500
Secondary – 4- lane undivided 21,600 24,000
Collector – 2-lane undivided 10,800 12,000
Source: City of Orange General Plan Update Traffic Report, 2008.

Various LOS policy standards have been established to evaluate observed traffic conditions, future development plans, and circulation system modifications. At the local level, the City of Orange has established LOS D as the lowest acceptable level of service for both roadway segments and peak -hour signalized intersection movements. At the regional planning level, Orange County’s Congestion Management Plan (CMP) specifies LOS E as the operating standard for roadways and intersections on the CMP highway system. The CMP Highway System consists of the Orange County smart street network plus the state highway system.

Thus, the SR-55 northbound and southbound ramps at Katella Avenue are CMP intersections within the City’s jurisdiction. The City does not have an adopted LOS standard for unsignalized intersections. Performance of unsignalized intersections is evaluated on a case - by-case basis.

In addition to the LOS standards for roadways and intersections, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 150 64.3), require “ vehicle miles traveled” (VMT), to measure transportation impacts on the community . VMT refers to the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project.

For purposes of compliance with CEQA, a significant impact would occur if the baseline and/or cumulative project -generated VMT per service population (population plus employment) exceeds the anticipated City of Orange General Plan Buildout VMT per service population. One vehicle traveling one mile would generate one VMT. Additionally, the project’s effect on VMT would be considered significant if it resulted in the baseline and/or cumulative link-level boundary citywide VMT per service population increases under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition. Link-level boundary VMT is calculated by summing all weekday VMT on a roadway network within the City boundary and includes all trips including trips that pass through the City’s roadway network but do not start and end with in City.

These thresholds are designed to reduce the number of miles traveled by automobiles, and are implemented within the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. 282

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-14
In order to maximize the efficiency of its circulation system, the City will look at where physical improvements to the circulation infrastructure can be made to expand capacity and increase traffic flow. To maximize efficiency of the road system, the City will support traffic signal coordination and spacing, and will
also discourage on -street parking along
arterials. In addition, the City will
explore ways to reduce the demand for
vehicular transportation, specifically
through the provision and maintenance
of bike lanes, bikeways , and trails, and
will also encourage additional regional
transit services and support facilities.

The City’s Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) ordinance (Chapter

10.83 of the Municipal Code) further
specifies a variety of techniques
available to employers with 100 or more
employees to advance the goals of efficiently utilizing the existing and planned transportation system and reducing vehicle emissions.

City Master Plan of Streets and Highways
Land Use Element policy will allow land use changes and intensification to occur in specific focus areas within the City. The City’s Master Plan of Streets and Highways displayed in Figure CM -2 has been developed in close coordination with land use policy to ensure that traffic generated by new development will not compromise the City’s goal to ensure that intersections and roadway segments operate efficiently. The map identifies components of the City’s roadway circulation system . The map also indicates where augmented roads are needed, and pinpoints locations for enhanced intersections , including the future Meats Avenue interchange at SR-55. Although most of Orange is already built out, most remaining developable land is located in the eastern part of the City. New development in east Orange will require construction of new roads to provide circulation and traffic flow to residents and businesses. Land Use Element policies enabling reuse and redevelopment within established portions of the City, particularly within the focus areas , may also necessitate roadway widening and intersection enhancements . The City will continue to collect funds for necessary circulation system capital improvements through a program that sets up a fee structure for all new development and redevelopment projects. This program will require developers to pay their fair share for transportation system improvements required by new projects. The City will use the annual seven -year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) process to prioritize, fund, and complete improvements required to achieve build -out of the proposed roadway system identified in Figure CM-2.

Roadway Widening
Roadway widening in specific locations will be necessary to obtain new travel lanes.

Additional travel lanes may be acquired either by obtaining additional rights -of-way as necessary or by constructing new lanes within existing rights -of-way. Parking restrictions may be applied to allow additional lanes to be provided within existing rights-of-way. 283

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-15
Old Towne Street Network
The Old Towne street network is a clear example of Orange’s grid street pattern. Parallel roadways have been established in both the north -south and east -west direction to distribute traffic evenly. The Plaza area at Glassell Street and Chapman Avenue is a unique feature that creates discontinuous traffic flows along these two primary roadways. However, no plans have been made to modify the National Register -listed Historic Plaza to increase its traffic carrying capacity.

284
285

CM-15

Figure CM-2 City Master Plan of Streets and Highways
GPA 2014-0001 (12/8/15)
GPA 2010-0001 (8/10/10)
286

CM-16

(This Page Left Intentionally Blank)

287

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN

CM-17
In light of these conditions, parallel roadways such as Almond Avenue, Palmyra Avenue, Lemon Street, Olive Street, Shaffer Street, Grand Street, Palm Avenue, and Maple Street Avenue will continue to serve as local collectors around The Plaza.

Metropolitan Drive Extension
Extending Metropolitan Drive behind the University of California, Irvine (UCI) Medical Center will help facilitate the movement of north -south traffic near The BlockThe Outlets at Orange shopping area, improve access to Interstate 5 (I -5), and relieve congestion on The City Drive.

Metropolitan Drive will be extended from The City Drive/State College Boulevard to the Metropolitan Drive/Rampart Street connection.

Critical Intersection Program
Intersections serve as traffic control points for the circulation system, regulating the flow of vehicles along City streets and sometimes limiting the capacity of the system. In the long term, system capacity and efficiency can both be increased if intersections are designed to handle future anticipated traffic volumes. Typically, the design of the roadways forming an intersection dictates the intersection configuration. Department of Public Works standards indicate that a left -turn pocket may or may not be provided, depending on traffic volumes through the intersection. However, one pocket may not be adequate to handle vehicles during peak hours. Traffic may back up into a through travel lane, resulting in congestion at the intersection and at other locations along the roadway.

One way of providing additional intersection capacity at critical locations is through the use of special intersection configurations known as “critical intersections.” Critical intersections deviate from typical City design standards by increasing the number of lanes at an intersection beyond what typically would be required. By increasing capacity at the intersection, the circulation link increases overall system capacity.

The Master Plan of Streets and Highways (Figure CM -2) identifies the locations of critical intersections within Orange. A list of these intersections and diagrams depicting their geometries are on file in the Public Works Department.

Regional Roadway System
The City’s local circulation network is connected to an efficient regional circulation system.

Figure CM -2 shows the freeways that traverse the Orange planning area. The Santa Ana Freeway ( I-5) provides interstate and regional access to the City. In addition, SR-57, SR-55, and SR-22 all provide connections to the City from northern Orange County and neighboring Los Angeles County, San Diego County, Riverside County, and San Bernardino County . SR-91 and SR-241 provide additional, more limited freeway access. SR-241 is a toll facility controlled by the Transportation Corridor Agency (TCA).

I-5 is a northwest -southeast freeway that passes through the southwest corner of the City, and provides direct access to Los Angeles County to the north and San Diego County to the south. I-5 has two interchanges within Orange —one located at its junction with SR-57 and SR-22 (commonly known as the Orange Crush ) and the other at State College Boulevard/The 288

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-18
City Drive. The junction at the Orange Crush currently has the most severe congestion, which directly affects the roadway system in the City. With projected future growth in Orange and in the region, traffic flow at this junction is expected to worsen. The City will continue to work with and support the efforts of local and regional agencies to mitigate the increased traffic congestion in this area.

SR-91 is an east -west freeway that provides access to key arterial facilities in Orange , including interchanges at Tustin Street and Glassell Street. SR-91 also provides regional access through interchanges with SR-55 and SR-57 and SR-241.

SR-22 is an east-west freeway that crosses through the southern portion of the City. Five SR- 22 interchanges are located in the City, at Tustin Street, Glassell Street, Main Street/La Veta Avenue, Bristol Street, and The City Drive.

SR-55 is a north -south freeway that passes through the center of Orange, and provides access to the coastal communities of Orange County. SR-55 has four interchanges in Orange, located at Lincoln Avenue, Katella Avenue, Chapman Avenue, and SR-22. An additional future interchange at Meats Avenue is contemplated within this General Plan.

SR-57 is a north-south freeway that originates at the junction of I -5 and SR-22 and extends to San Dimas in Los Angeles County. It provides access for the eastern parts of Los Angeles County, and central and northern parts of Orange County. SR-57 has three interchanges in Orange, at Chapman Avenue, Orangewood Avenue, and the junctions of I-5 and SR-22.

The Eastern Transportation Corridor ( SR-241) is a north -south toll facility located in the eastern portion of the planning area. This facility provides direct access to east Orange. SR- 241 has three toll lanes in each direction and provides regional access through an interchange at Santiago Canyon Road.

Consistency with County Master Plan of Arterial Highways Maintaining consistency with the County’s Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) is required in order to ensure that the City’s circulation system develops in a manner that promotes regional mobility. At a practical level, consistency is also required in order for the City to receive transportation funding under Measure M , also known as OC G o. Orange’s Master Plan of Streets and Highways (Figure CM-2) is generally consistent with the MPAH.

While the City’s Master Plan of Streets and Highways has been consistent with the County MPAH to maintain funding eligibility, both the City of Orange and OCTA have the goal of a realistic and implementable MPAH. In keeping with this spirit, in 2010 as a follow up to adoption of this General Plan, the City worked with OCTA on amendments to the MPAH and Master Plan of Streets and Highways that downgraded the long -standing classification of Chapman Avenue and Glassell Street from 4-lane Primary Arterials to 2-lane Collector Streets, and removed the Critical Intersection classification of the Plaza. A remaining desire of the City is to work with OCTA to downgrade La Veta Avenue between Glassell Street and Cambridge Street from a Secondary Arterial to a Collector Street to reflect physical constraints related to historic buildings and features in the Old Towne National Register Historic District.
289

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-19
To initiate the MPAH amendment process, a local agency must submit a written request to OCTA describing the amendment requested and provide documentation to support the basis for the request. A copy of the request must be submitted concurrently to the City Managers of adjoining cities . For the facilities under consideration, this would require a letter to be forwarded to the City of Santa Ana.

Once the initial request is forwarded to OCTA, a conference between the City of Orange, OCTA, and potential affected jurisdictions is held to determine whether mutual agreement exists for the MPAH amendment. If mutual agreement exists, then Orange is expected to proceed with adopting this revision to the Circulation & Mobility Element. Upon adoption, the City of Orange would submit the Circulation & Mobility Element to OCTA and request OCTA Board approval of the Orange County MPAH amendment.

Public Transportation
Effective regional transportation strategies are required to successfully implement City and County plans for accommodating future growth. Such strategies must link the City of Orange with other regional employment and commercial centers, as well as airports and other transportation hubs, and should fully integrate alternatives to the automobile. Alternative modes of transportation , including public transportation, bicycling, and walking , are important components of a comprehensive circulation system. These modes of transportation also help reduce air pollution and road congestion.

Public transportation plays a key role in future land use development and mobility. As the roadway system reaches capacity, alternative modes of transportation provide additional capacity as well as an enhanced degree of mobility for residents, workers , and visitors.

Existing services are expected to continue while enhancements, many of them currently in the planning stages, will increase the viability of alternative modes of travel. The integration into the circulation system of alternative modes of transportation , such as bus, rail, bicycle , and pedestrian, is essential to maximizing mobility opportunities for residents, workers , and visitors.

Bus Service
OCTA provides public bus service for the City of Orange. In addition, the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) provides long -distance service between The Village at Orange and the Downtown Terminal in Riverside. Table CM-4 identifies local bus routes that connect various activity centers in Orange to each other and to the region.

Table CM-5 shows the different community, station link, and inter- or intra-County routes that serve Orange. Community routes are express bus routes that provide faster connections to activity centers within and outside Orange County. Station link shuttles provide services between the Orange Transportation Center (OTC) and Orange. Both community and station link routes operate only at peak commuter times.

In addition to the fixed -route service, OCTA also offers several types of specialized community transportation services, such as standard service (curb -to-curb service), door -to- door service, subscription service, and same-day taxi service. Some of these services cater to senior citizens and people with disabilities residing in the City. 290

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-20
OCTA has forecast bus ridership to increase by approximately 75 percent by 2030. Some of this ridership increase will be the result of enhanced services, including express bus routes and introduction of bus rapid transit service. Much of the increase will be driven by increased arterial and freeway congestion levels in conjunction with improved local bus service. OCTA is planning to introduce bus rapid transit (BRT) services by 2011 on the Bristol Street -State College Boulevard, Harbor Boulevard, and Westminster Avenue corridors. This service would include planned BRT stops in Orange on State College Boulevard south of Orangewood Avenue and on The City Drive south of Chapman Avenue. With the projected success of this service, which is comparable to the Los Angeles Metro Rapid service, it is likely that BRT will be implemented on other key corridors. Corridors that have been considered for potential future application include Katella Avenue.

Convenient, accessible, frequent, and easy -to-use public transit is a cornerstone element of the proposed land use plan. Planned mixed -use residential and commercial areas and intensified commercial and professional office corridors must be coupled with increases in transit service. Orange’s land use plan features mixed -use districts that strategically concentrate population density near alternative transit facilities, such as the OTC in Old Towne, transit hubs at The BlockThe Outlets at Orange and South Main Street, and the future Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC) station in Anaheim near the City’s western boundary at Katella Avenue.

Table CM-4
Local Bus Routes
Route # Route Type Route Service Service Corridors Key Orange Activity Centers Served 24 Local Fullerton–Orange Malvern Ave. / The Village at Orange Chapman Ave. / Lincoln Park and Ride
Tustin St..
42 Local Orange–Seal Beach Lincoln Ave. / The Village at Orange Los Alamitos Blvd. / Lincoln Park and Ride
Seal Beach Blvd.
46 Local Los Alamitos–Orange Ball Rd. / The Village at Orange Taft Ave. Lincoln Park and Ride
47 Local Brea–Newport Beach Brea Blvd. / Theo Lacy Jail Anaheim Blvd. / Orangewood Children's Home
Fairview St. UCI Medical Center
The Block at Orange
50 Local Long Beach–Orange Katella Ave. The Village at Orange Lincoln Park and Ride
53 Local Brea–Irvine Main St. Batavia Industrial Parks
Children's Hospital – CHOC
St. Joseph's Hospital
OCTA Offices
54 Local Garden Grove–Orange Chapman Ave. Orange Civic Center Orange Transportation Center
The Plaza
UCI Medical Center
The Block at Orange
Rancho Santiago Community College
291

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-21
Table CM-4
Local Bus Routes
Route # Route Type Route Service Service Corridors Key Orange Activity Centers Served 56 Local Garden Grove–Orange Garden Grove Blvd. Orange Transportation Center OCTA Offices
Children's Hospital–CHOC
St. Joseph's Hospital
57 Local Brea–Newport Beach State College Blvd. / The Block at Orange Bristol St. UCI Medical Center
Theo Lacy Jail
Orangewood Children's Home
59 Local Brea–Irvine Kraemer Blvd. / Orange Transportation Center Glassell St. / Chapman University
Grand Ave. / Orange Plaza
Von Karman Ave.
71 Local Yorba Linda–Balboa Tustin St. / The Village at Orange Red Hill Ave. / Lincoln Park and Ride
Newport Blvd.

Source: Orange County Transportation Authority, 2006

Table CM-5
Community, Station Link, Intra- and Inter-County Bus Routes Route # Route
Type Route Service Service Corridors Key Orange Activity Centers Served 131 Community Yorba Linda–Orange Lakeview Ave./ The Village at Orange Riverdale Ave. / Lincoln Park and Ride
Tustin St.
147 Community Brea–Santa Ana Raiit St. / UCI Medical Center Greenville St. / The Block at Orange
Fairview St. OCTA Offices
St. Joseph's Hospital
Children's Hospital – CHOC
167 Community Anaheim–Irvine Santiago Blvd. / The Village at Orange Hewes St. / Lincoln Park and Ride
Bryan Ave.
453 Station Link Orange Transportation
Center Chapman Ave. / Orange Transportation Center
–St. Joseph's Hospital Main St. / Children's Hospital–CHOC La Veta Ave. St. Joseph's Hospital
OCTA Offices
454 Station Link Orange Transportation
Center Chapman Ave. / Orange Transportation Center
–The Block at Orange Metropolitan Dr. UCI Medical Center The Block at Orange
Bergen Brunswig
Nexus
292

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-22
Table CM-5
Community, Station Link, Intra- and Inter-County Bus Routes Route # Route
Type Route Service Service Corridors Key Orange Activity Centers Served 213 Intra County Brea–Irvine Express SR-55 Lincoln Park and Ride The Village at Orange
757 Inter County Diamond Bar SR-57 UCI Medical Center
–Santa Ana Express The Block at Orange
RTA 149 Inter County Riverside–Orange SR-91 The Village at Orange (Operated by RTA) Downtown Riverside
Source: Orange County Transportation Authority and Riverside Transit Agency, 2006.

The City recognizes that ridership of both the bus and rail transit systems will increase, and has designed a land use plan that both enables and accommodates increased transit use. A large part of the City’s role in accommodating additional transit use includes providing convenient and attractive transit amenities and streetscape features that improve user comfort and p erception of safety , thus encouraging transit use. Transit-oriented Development (TOD) design features will be encouraged in major commercial and employment areas within the City, such as the Town and Country Road corridor, South Main Street, Katella Avenue, Uptown Orange , and Old Towne. Such TOD features may consist of streetscape measures such as bus turn-outs, benches, trash receptacles, shelters from wind and rain, and lighting. TOD features may also be more fundamental to the permitted uses and design within projects, such as incorporating child care centers, convenience stores, or personal services within the retail component of mixed -use projects, or near professional office concentrations. These and other measures help to make the transit system more accessible to a wide range of people.

The City will continue to work with OCTA to pursue expanded community circulators, such as the current Station Link service, that will connect people to rail transit, employment centers, residential areas, and commercial corridors. Additional options, such as jitney services that function as group taxis, will also be explored.

The City will also continue to support OCTA initiatives and services that promote the mobility of Orange’s senior, disabled, and youth populations. To accommodate the needs of these groups, the City will continue to work with OCTA to offer para -transit services, and will seek ways to improve mobility for Orange youth through transit.

The City of Orange will continue to cooperate with OCTA and other regional providers to establish new bus routes and stops, and to provide transit amenities. New subdivision plans will be reviewed by OCTA to assess impacts on bus services, and to examine the need to provide bus stops or bays. Orange will also work with OCTA to maintain and, if needed, expand successful transfer stations in Old Towne, the Village at Orange, and The Block Outlets at Orange.

Rail Transit
Many current passenger and commuter fixed -rail transit options in the City will be expanded in the future, offering significant alternatives to automobile transit for many individuals who 293

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-23
commute to or from the City for housing or employment. Rail transit now has a proven track record in Orange, and Metrolink seeks to expand rail services in support of land use transformations near current and future rail stations.

Metrolink
Metrolink operates seven commuter rail lines in Southern California, two of which pass through Orange. The Orange County Line offers direct connections to Union Station in Los Angeles to the north and to Oceanside to the south. The Inland Empire–Orange County Line provides direct connections to Riverside/San Bernardino to the east and San Juan Capistrano to the south. Roughly 30 Metrolink trains pass through the City on a daily basis. The Metrolink station in Orange is located three blocks from The Plaza at the O TC, close to a variety of stores and civic uses in Old Towne. Amtrak and Metrolink operate a cooperative program called “Rail -2-Rail”, which allows all Metrolink monthly pass holders to use Amtrak within the limits specified on the pass.

Another much-anticipated rail service improvement is intra -county rail service along the County’s core transit corridor. This service, which will be provided by Metrolink on behalf of OCTA, is an attempt to provide intra-county trips with a high degree of reliability. This 30 - minute service is planned to operate between the Irvine Transportation Center (and possibly Laguna Niguel) and the Fullerton Transportation Center throughout the day to supplement Metrolink’s peak period commuter service.

The City recognizes that plans to increase daily service on the current Metrolink lines, improvements to the O TC, and future expansion of Metrolink services to new destinations would be beneficial to Orange by providing multi -modal transportation options for people living and working in the community, thus reducing auto dependence for business and leisure purposes.

Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center
The Platinum Triangle, which borders Angel
Stadium in the City of Anaheim, proposes a
variety of high-density multiple-family high-rise
housing, office space , and commercial uses.

The Anaheim Regional Transportation
Intermodal Center ( ARTIC) is located adjacent
to the proposed development, between Angel
Stadium and the Honda Center. ARTIC will beis
a major regional transportation center similar
in scale to Union Station in Los Angeles and
Ontario International Airport in Ontario. The
intermodal center will is be a stopping point
for Amtrak, Metrolink, buses, and future high -
speed rail systems that connect to Ontario Airport, Las Vegas, and the Bay Area.

The City of Orange will coordinate with the City of Anaheim, OCTA , and others to ensure that the City is able to take full advantage of the regional mobility benefits offered by ARTIC.

Potential benefits offered to the City by ARTIC include:
294

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-24
▪ BRT service along Katella Avenue;
▪ a dynamic mixed-use commercial and residential center at the westernmost end of Katella Avenue; and
▪ bicycle and pedestrian connections to the Santa Ana River.

California High Speed Rail Corridor
The California High -Speed Rail Authority was established as a state agency in 1996 to direct the planning, design, construction, and operation of a future high -speed train system extending from Sacramento, San Francisco, and Oakland in the north to Los Angeles and San Diego in the south. This high-speed train is proposed to stop at ARTIC. OCTA estimates that by 2025, the California High Speed Rail Corridor will serve between 150,000 and 230,000 passengers each week.

Magnetic Levitation Train
A magnetic levitation train is being planned that would connect Anaheim to Ontario, Victorville, Barstow, Primm, and Las Vegas. The California -Nevada Super Speed Train (SST) will use Magnetic Levitation Systems (Maglev), a type of transportation technology that uses electric power and non-contact electromagnetic levitation to sustain speeds in excess of 300 mph.

The trip from ARTIC to Las Vegas on the California -Nevada SST will take about 90 minutes, with an estimated 40.4 million annual riders. A key future benefit offered by the Maglev train is a high -speed connection to Ontario International Airport, which is planned to grow substantially and to expand international service in coming decades. The City will support efforts of the California High-Speed Rail Authority, OCTA, and Southern California Association of Governments to construct these important rail corridors, and will cooperate with all parties involved in any future studies conducted to examine the noise and other impacts associated with the corridors within Orange.

Sidewalks, Trails and Bikeways
Walking and biking contribute to a healthy community, and play increasingly significant roles as alternatives to the automobile. The City recognizes this by providing and maintaining sidewalks, trails, and bikeways to support pedestrians and cyclists.

Pedestrian Facilities
In addition to providing basic transportation routes, sidewalks and pathways offer the opportunity to create appealing public spaces that reflect community pride and invite people to walk. Proposed mixed-use areas and reinvigorated commercial areas throughout the City will provide new and reinvented spaces for people to walk and shop. Walkability and access are essential components of a circulation system that easily and specifically accommodates pedestrians. Features that contribute to w alkability include wide sidewalks, safe street crossings, design elements that encourage cautious driving, and a pleasant and safe walking environment. Sidewalks, walkways, well -designed pedestrian crossings, pathways, and pedestrian short-cuts allow people to get from one destination point to another with ease. 295

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-25
Dedicated pedestrian paths can provide access between residential and activity areas, especially if streets do not connect. Access strategies for school children, seniors, and people with disabilities should also be incorporated into street and sidewalk plans. The City supports proactive integration of pedestrian improvements and amenities within the circulation system to improve walkability.

The City will create and implement a pedestrian -oriented streetscape master plan addressing key commercial corridors, including Tustin Street, Chapman Avenue, Main Street, Lincoln Avenue, and Katella Avenue. The master plan will address all functional aspects of the pedestrian environment . It will identify pedestrian links that need improvement and strengthening, determine new pedestrian links to underserved areas, ensure adequate sidewalk widths to accommodate lighting and street trees, develop sidewalks in the industrial area that create links between bus stops, encourage safe routes to schools and recreation facilities, and minimize barriers to pedestrian and bicycle access.

Recreational Trails and Bikeways
A comprehensive network of recreational trails and bikeways greatly benefits Orange residents and visitors by providing popular modes of transportation for recreation. In addition to recreation activities, the City also supports walking and bicycling as viable commute alternatives to the automobile. The City’s plan for recreational trails and bikeways is shown in Figure CM-3.

The plan includes trails maintained by the County and private homeowners associations, and is consistent with the OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan . It is also consistent with the County’s major riding and hiking trails and off -road paved bikeways. As described in the Vision for the Future, the plan will enable the City to connect parks to activity centers and residential areas using a combination of recreational trails and bikeways that truly allows people to travel from place to place within the City without needing an automobile.

Recreational Trails
As shown in Figure CM -3, over 70 miles of existing recreational trails are located within the City, connecting a large number of neighborhoods and community parks. In addition, 104 miles of proposed future trails are planned throughout Orange on land currently utilized for a variety of purposes, including flood control, railroad rights-of-way, and roadways.

The City will use the annual sevenfive-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) process to prioritize, fund, and build proposed trail segments identified in Figure CM-3. These trails have been and will continue to be constructed and administered through cooperative efforts of the City, County, developers, and private homeowner associations.

Desired cross -sections for recreational trails are identified in Figure CM -4. The City may require construction of portions of proposed trails identified in Figure CM -3 as a condition of development approval for projects located adjacent to the proposed trail alignments.

Funding for recreational trails and associated restoration projects comes from a variety of federal, state, and regional sources. Priority for funding of trail improvements will be given to projects that complete loops within the system, provide missing links for regional and local 296

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-26
trail systems, or serve as destination links to schools, parks, retail businesses, or regional trails.

Priorities for the recreational trail system include:
▪ trail connections to the Santiago Oaks Regional Park extension west of Cannon Street, consisting of a connection between Calle Grande and Cannon Street, and the Jamestown trail from the Orange Park Acres equestrian arena to Cannon Street; ▪ trail connection from Serrano Avenue near Fred Barrera Park to Santiago Oaks Regional Park;
▪ Mabury Ranch Trail connection from the proposed Cerro Villa Park to the Santiago Oaks Regional Park;
▪ Serrano Avenue connection near Cannon Street; and
▪ Additional trail connection into Santiago Oaks Regional Park from Orange Park Acres.

To increase the number of people using non -vehicular means of transportation, the City will encourage putting in place a safe network of crosswalks, grade separations, and walkways to ensure the safety of pedestrians, bicyclists, and equestrians. Where appropriate, traffic calming devices and methods such as median landscaping and provision of bike or transit lanes should be used to slow traffic, improve roadway capacity, and address potential safety issues. The City will continue to work towards improving the overall condition, appearance, and safety of both medians and sidewalks in Orange.

Bikeways
Orange’s relatively mild climate
permits bicycle riding year -round, and
the growing popularity of bicycling has
drawn enthusiasts onto the streets
and bike trails throughout the City. The
plan for recreational trails and
bikeways (Figure CM -3) shows the
planned system of bikeways within the
City. The Orange Bikeway Master Plan
has established three classes of bicycle
routes that adhere to California
Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) standards:
▪ Class I Off-road bike paths are located on vacated rail lines, water corridors, or areas otherwise separated from streets.
▪ Class II On-road bike lanes are located along arterial roadways that are delineated by painted stripes and other features.
▪ Class III On-road bike routes share use with motor vehicle traffic. They provide a route that is signed but not striped.
297

CM-27

298

CM-28
299

CM-28
Figure CM-3 Plan for Recreational Trails and Bikeways

300

CM-28

(This Page Left Intentionally Blank)
301

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-29

Figure CM-4
Trail Standards

Cross-sections for each type of route are shown in Figure CM-5.

As shown in Figure CM-3, several future bike routes are planned within Orange, including the following high-priority projects:
▪ Completing Class I bike routes along Santiago Creek and the Tustin Branch Trail ▪ Establishing Class II bike lanes, including:

302

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-30

Figure CM-5
Bikeway Standards
303

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-31

o An east/west corridor on Walnut Avenue from the western City limits to Santiago Boulevard
o North/south corridors on Main Street from Taft Street to Palm Street, on Batavia Street from Chapman Avenue to La Veta Avenue, and on Parker Street from La Veta Avenue to the City limits
▪ Establishing Class III routes along Almond StreetAvenue, Feldner Street, and Bedford Street
The City has recently completed a paved bike trail along Santiago Creek from Tustin Street to the western City limit that continues on to Main Place Mall and the Discovery Science Center as well as two additional segments to the bike trail, which will extends the Santiago Creek Trail from Tustin Street to Grijalva Park, and also connect Grijalva Park at Santiago Creek to Collins Avenue along the City -owned portion of the Tustin Branch Trail right -of-way between Walnut and Collins Avenues. The Santiago Creek trail is planned to extend through and beyond the City, connecting the regional Santa Ana River Trail to Santiago Oaks Regional Park and wilderness areas east of Orange. The City will continue to work towards designing a comprehensive bike trail system that is highly accessible and safe for those who wish to use it.

The City has proposed Class II and III routes along many north -south and east-west arterials, all of which connect to pedestrian trails and Class I routes. The City responds to the need to provide safe and efficient bike travel by making every effort to provide bikeways separate from the roadway. When bicyclists must share the road with automobiles, the City will work to improve overall safety.

Currently, only one two bicycle parking facilit iesy areis located in Orange, at the OTC (Metrolink station) and the Old Towne West Metrolink Orange Parking Structure. The City will work to provide greater bike amenities including delineated bike lanes and clear signage along bike trails. The City will also install bicycle racks and safe storage facilities at parking areas for City facilities, as appropriate, and will require privately developed projects to incorporate on-site bicycle facilities in accordance with the City’s Zoning Code (Title 17 of the Orange Municipal Code).

Parking Facilities
Although parking is often considered a separate issue from vehicle circulation, it is important to address on -street parking because it has a direct effect on roadway capacity. In order to facilitate improved traffic flow along Orange’s major arterials, the City generally plans to permit on -street parking only on streets
classified as Primary or Secondary
Arterials or Collector Streets.

Off-street parking deficiencies can
reduce business activity, and can cause
vehicles to re -circulate on public streets,
which increases traffic volumes and
congestion by reducing capacity for
through traffic. The City’s Zoning Code
304

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-32
includes parking requirements to ensure that an adequate number of spaces are provided on-site for most uses. The Code also establishes minimum stall dimensions consistent with current standards for other jurisdictions. These regulations apply to all new developments, and may be applied to current uses that are modified or expanded.

Particular concern has been expressed within the community regarding current and expected future parking shortages in Old Towne. Figure CM -6 identifies the location of existing public parking lots in Old Towne. Most Old Towne parking lots have a maximum time limit of three hours, with or without a permit. However, some parking lots, such as the OTC parking located off Chapman Avenue, have no time limit.

Orange will continue to provide sufficient parking to meet community demands. In Old Towne, the City will study the benefits of creating a parking district and the feasibility of developing underutilized parking lots surrounding The Plaza as public parking facilities. The City may encourage the use of shared parking, consolidated parking facilities, and underground parking or parking structures to provide additional off -street parking to meet future demands in areas throughout the City with higher concentrations of commercial uses.

Circulation System Aesthetics
The City has determined that it is necessary and desirable to improve certain roadways and their rights -of-way to enhance the experience for all users of these corridors. Major commercial corridors have been designated within the Urban Design Element to be improved with pedestrian -scale enhancements. Enhancements could include street trees, sidewalk improvements, lighting, bus shelters, and crosswalks. These improvements not only offer a more aesthetically -pleasing experience for all users in these corridors, they also may offer increased safety and security.

Streetscape improvements offer safety and security to both motorists and non -motorists through increased visual cues, better visibility, and increased activity. Many streetscape enhancements provide not only a comfortable environment for the pedestrian and bicyclist, but also offer drivers visual cues that a non -motorist could be expected in an area.

Improvements such as striping, bus shelters, and pedestrian -scaled signage guide the non - motorist towards areas that are most appropriate for their use. These same cues help the motorist to see where the presence of pedestrians and bicyclists is most likely to occur. For example, a well-marked crosswalk guides the pedestrian towards the location in the right -of- way most appropriate for crossing, while also alerting the motorist to slow down and look out for pedestrian traffic.

Visibility offered by pedestrian -scaled lighting benefits non -motorists and motorists alike.

Pedestrians and bicyclists are better able to see their way, which increases their feelings of security. Improvements that create a sense of security for pedestrians encourage increased use and activity. This increased activity, in turn, leads to a greater feeling of safety. The City has acknowledged the importance of improving the experience of users on many of its major commercial corridors.
305

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-33

306

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-34

307

CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
CM-35

*Note: Possession of City issued parking permit enables holder to exceed specified time limit GPA 2010-0001 (8/10/10)

Figure CM-6
Public Parking Lots in Old Towne Orange

CIRCULATION & MOBILITY IMPLEMENTATION
The goals, policies, and plans identified in this Element are implemented through a variety of City plans, ordinances, development requirements, capital improvements, and ongoing collaboration with regional agencies and neighboring jurisdictions. Specific implementation measures for this Element are contained in the General Plan Appendix.

308
GROWTH

MANAGEMENT

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
GM-1

INTRODUCTION AND VISION FOR THE FUTURE
The Growth Management Element contains policies for the planning and provision of traffic improvements that are necessary for the City’s orderly growth and development. The policies and programs presented in this Element are for the establishment of traffic Level of Service (LOS) standards , a development mitigation program, a development phasing program, and an annual monitoring program.

Orange’s Vision for the Future , presented in the General Plan introduction, includes the following objectives related to the Growth Management Element:
▪ The City will build upon existing assets to create a living, active , and diverse environment that complements all lifestyles and enhances neighborhoods, without compromising the valued resources that make Orange unique.
▪ Orange recognizes the importance of managing development in a manner that ensures adequate public services and infrastructure and limits impacts on the natural environment.

Policies, plans, and programs outlined within this Element are designed to improve residents’ quality of life by ensuring that needed roadway and circulation improvements are completed in step with both new development and future infill development.

Purpose of the Growth Management Element
The purpose of the Growth Management Element is to mandate that (1) growth and development be based upon the City’s ability to provide an adequate circulation system , and that (2) such growth and development meet the requirements of the Orange County voter - approved Revised Traffic Improvement and Growth Management Ordinance, also known as Measure M or OC Go.

Scope and Content of the Growth Management Element
The Growth Management Element comprises three sections:
1) Introduction;
2) Issues, Goals, and Policies; and
3) Growth Management Plan.

The Issues, Goals, and Policies section provides guidance to the City with regard to complying with Measure M growth management requirements. Contents of the Growth Management Element describe the City’s approach to managing future growth concurrently with 309

GROWTH MANAGEMENT

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
GM-2
transportation infrastructure. The Plan also explains how the goals and policies will be achieved and implemented.

The Growth Management Element applies to all new development within the City with the possible exception of approved vested projects or projects with development agreements.

Those projects would require individual legal review to determine Growth Management Element applicability. The City may consider, on a case -by-case basis, future project exemptions to encourage redevelopment activities or the development of affordable housing. Privately initiated Land Use Element amendments, zone changes, and other discretionary projects will be specifically reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Element policies.

Relationship to Other General Plan Elements
A major goal of the Growth Management Element is to ensure that the management and implementation of traffic improvements within the City are coordinated and timed concurrently with anticipated development and redevelopment projects, consistent with policies and plans set forth in the Land Use, Circulation & Mobility, Housing and Infrastructure Elements. This Element does not replace or supersede other General Plan elements—such as the Circulation & Mobility Element—that also specify goals and policies for transportation and circulation issues. Instead, the Growth Management Element addresses, amplifies, and supports traffic Level of Service (LOS) standards included in the Circulation & Mobility Element and provides a means to implement the City’s Master Plan of Streets and Highways.

Similarly, the Growth Management Element supports the vision, conditions , and parameters under which future development and redevelopment may occur, as expressed within the Land Use Element. The Growth Management Element consists of goals, objectives, and policies to serve as a guide for the selection of mitigation measures and conditions of approval for projects processed in the City. It has been crafted to minimize duplication of Measure M and Congestion Management Program (CMP) requirements.

The Growth Management Element works in tandem with the Housing Element to direct housing to the most appropriate sites. It also describes the desired relationship between the phasing and construction of development and roadway infrastructure to serve new development. Similarly, the Infrastructure Element describes the City departments and other service providers responsible for providing sewer, water, storm drains , and dry utilities to future development within Orange’s planning area.

Definitions
For the purposes of this Element and compliance with Measure M, several terms used throughout the Element are defined in Table GM-1.
310

GROWTH MANAGEMENT

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
GM-3
Table GM-1
Growth Management Terms Defined
Term Definition
Capital Improvement
Program (CIP)
A 57-year list of capital projects to meet, maintain, and improve the City’s adopted traffic Level of service (LOS) and performance standards. The CIP includes: 1) the description of the proposed project improvements , 2) the anticipated funding source , and 3) the estimated cost in current dollars.

Critical Movement Any of the conflicting through or turning movements at an intersection which determine the allocation of green signal time.

Deficient Intersection
Fund
A trust fund that may be established to implement necessary improvements to existing intersections which do not meet the LOS standards adopted in this Element. Such a fund may be established from transportation fees, mutually agreed upon by the Growth Management Element in which the deficiency exists.

Deficient Intersection
List
A list of intersections that: 1) do not meet the City’s LOS standards for reasons that are beyond the control of the City (e.g. ramp metering effects, traffic generated outside the City’s jurisdiction,) and 2) are not brought into compliance with the LOS standard in the most current 57-year CIP.

Additional intersections may be added to the list only as a result of conditions that are beyond the City’s control.

Development
Phasing Program
A program which establishes the requirement that building and grading permits shall be approved or issued in a manner that assures implementation of required transportation improvements through either construction of said improvements and/or timely provision of mitigation fees as determined by the City during the development’s approval process. The City shall specify the order of improvements and/or timing of payment of the required mitigation fees (as they relate to the number of dwelling units, square feet of development, or trip generation), based, at a minimum, on mitigation measures adopted in conjunction with the environmental documentation and other relevant factors.

Growth Management
Areas (GMAs)
Subregions of Orange County established by the Regional Advisory Planning Committee to promote inter-jurisdictional coordination to address infrastructure concerns and implement needed improvements. GMAs are comprised of elected officials and staff from local agencies whose jurisdictions are covered, at least in part, by the GMA. The City of Orange is included in three of 11 Growth Management Areas (#3, #4, and #7) in the County, requiring representatives of the City to meet regularly with the surrounding communities of Anaheim, Santa Ana, Villa Park, Irvine, Tustin, Garden Grove, and Yorba Linda.

Growth Management
Element
The Growth Management Element of the City’s General Plan as required by the Orange County voter-approved Revised Traffic Improvement and Growth Management Ordinance, also known as Measure M or OC Go.

Level of Service
(LOS)
A qualitative measure of the relationship between the volume and capacity of a roadway , usually described by the letters “A” through “F.” LOS A describes freely flowing traffic conditions and LOS F describes congested roadways. LOS D is usually considered the industry standard for traffic analysis purposes.

Local Transportation
Authority
The body responsible for the implementation of Measure M as designated by the Orange County Board of Supervisors and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA).

Measurable Traffic A traffic volume resulting in a one percent increase in the sum of the critical movements at an intersection.

Measure M The Revised Traffic Improvement and Growth Management Ordinance adopted by Orange County voters on November 6, 1990. The Measure authorized the imposition of a half -cent retail sales tax for a period of 20 years effective April 1, 1991. A November 2006 ballot measure renewed the program through 2031. The sales tax increase will be allocated to local Orange County jurisdictions for use on local and regional transportation improvements and maintenance projects. As of fall 2020, Measure M, also known as OC Go, is expected to generate approximately $11.6 billion through 2041.

Performance
Monitoring Program
(PMP)
A comprehensive road improvement and financing plan which monitors the level of service requirements in this Element while taking into account measurable traffic impacts on the circulation system. This program will annually review the status of public and private roadway improvements associated with the 7-year CIP and Development Phasing Programs to assure that the City is taking 311

GROWTH MANAGEMENT

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
GM-4
Table GM-1
Growth Management Terms Defined
Term Definition
appropriate actions to achieve the LOS standards described in this Element.

Measure M Requirements
In 1990, Orange County voters approved Measure M, authorizing a half -cent retail sales tax increase for a period of 20 years effective April 1, 1991. County voters approved the renewal of Measure M , known as OC Go , extending the half -cent sales tax increase through 2031. As of fall 2020, OC Go is expected to generate approximately $11.6 billion through 2041.

Revenue generated by Measure M is returned to local jurisdictions for use on local and regional transportation improvements and maintenance projects. To qualify for this revenue, each jurisdiction must comply with the Countywide Traffic Improvement and Growth Management Program. The Countywide Growth Management Program is designed to foster a cooperative process among local Orange County jurisdictions to coordinate and implement traffic improvements, and to promote stronger planning on a countywide basis, while maintaining local authority over land use decisions. It is also designed to maintain local authority regarding performance standards, such as traffic LOS, while considering regional impacts.

Specifically, to receive an allocation of Measure M funds, the City of Orange must submit a statement of compliance with the growth management components of the program.

Requirements include the following:
▪ adoption of a Growth Management Element that includes:
o traffic LOS standards;
o a development mitigation program; and
o a development phasing and annual monitoring program;
▪ participation in interjurisdictional planning forums; ▪ development of a 57-year CIP;
▪ addressing housing options and job opportunities; and ▪ adoption of a Transportation Demand Management Ordinance.

The City’s compliance with these components has been addressed elsewhere in the Growth Management Element or is referenced where adopted by a separate action in a separate document.

Implementation of the Growth Management Element is incorporated throughout the City’s established development review and monitoring process where possible. The processes related to the Element are also crafted to be compatible with regional programs, including applicable Congestion Management and Air Quality Management Plans. This element will be reviewed annually to determine if appropriate changes are needed based on experience and changed circumstances.
312

GROWTH MANAGEMENT

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
GM-5

ISSUES, GOALS, AND POLICIES
The City of Orange’s population is projected to increase by approximately 27.5 percent between 2008 and 2030, based upon buildout of the City’s General Plan . Strong demand for transportation facilities and services will require continued reinvestment by the City and other service providers. It is important to balance future growth within Orange with roadways and other transportation services and facilities. The goals and policies of the Growth Management Element address two key issues: 1) reducing traffic congestion and 2) ensuring provision of adequate regional transportation facilities. These goals and policies tie together all development goals under the unifying theme of growth management, and indicate Orange’s commitment to continue to work with other jurisdictions to address regional concerns.

GOAL 1.0: Reduce traffic congestion within the City.

Policy 1.1: Establish LOS D as the level of service standard for traffic circulation within the City for both roadway segments and peak -hour signalized intersection movements.

Policy 1.2: Ensure completion of transportation improvements as agreed upon by the City and developer prior to completion of a development project.

Policy 1.3: Ensure that new development pays its fair share of street improvement costs, including regional traffic mitigation. New revenues generated from Measure M, if available, shall not be used to replace private developer funding which has been omitted for any project.

Policy 1.4: Continue to collect transportation impact fees for improvements within the City boundaries and work with adjacent jurisdictions to determine that an appropriate level of transportation impact fees are maintained within the established County GMAs.

Policy 1.5: Require new development projects to link issuance of building permits for the appropriate portion of the development plan to roadway improvements required to achieve the appropriate LOS. Monitor the implementation of this requirement for each new development project on an annual basis.

Policy 1.6: Integrate land use and transportation planning to provide adequate transportation system service standards.

Policy 1.7: Promote the expansion and development of alternative methods of transportation.

Policy 1.8: Encourage the development of housing within close proximity to jobs and services.

Policy 1.9: Ensure that new developments incorporate non -motorized and alternative transit amenities such as bike racks, bus benches and shelters, and pedestrian connections.
313

GROWTH MANAGEMENT

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
GM-6
Policy 1.10: Apply traffic calming measures, where appropriate, to residential neighborhoods affected by cut -through traffic in accordance with the City’s Residential Neighborhood Traffic Management Program.

Policy 1.11: Adopt and maintain a 57-year CIP in conformance with the provisions of Measure M for the purpose of maintaining the LOS standards established in this Element.

Policy 1.12: Promote traffic reduction strategies through the measures adopted within the City’s Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance.

GOAL 2.0: Provide for adequate regional and local transportation facilities.

Policy 2.1: Cooperate with other agencies to address regional issues and opportunities related to growth, transportation, infrastructure, and other planning issues.

Policy 2.2: Plan for future maintenance and expansion of the City’s roadway and bikeway systems and other infrastructure on an annual basis. Anticipate changes in funding availability, project priority, and project feasibility.

Policy 2.3: Continue to work toward achieving a balance between residential, industrial, commercial, and public land uses . Support programs that match Orange residents with local jobs to reduce long commutes and improve the fiscal and public health of the community.

Policy 2.4: Explore infill development or mixed -use opportunities wherever possible as developable space becomes more limited.

Policy 2.5: Continue to work with OCTA and other regional transit agencies to provide such amenities as bus shelters, shade, and other special streetscape treatments at transit stations that encourage the use of regional bus and train services.

Policy 2.6: Participate in interjurisdictional planning forums within the City’s established GMAs as adopted by the Regional Advisory Planning Council.

GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Growth Management Element expresses the City’s approach to managing future growth. Consequently, although there is some overlap among the policies presented in this Element and in other General Plan elements, this Element is defined as the key resource document for growth management policies and issues and Measure M compliance. The following section presents the key growth management challenges facing the City in coming years and the City’s approach to addressing the challenges.

Interjursidictional Coordination and Cooperation
The City recognizes that federal and state highways are a significant part of Orange’s transportation system, and therefore greatly influence operation of the City roadway system.

The City is bisected by the Costa Mesa Freeway (SR 55) in addition to being ringed by the Riverside Freeway (SR 91) to the north, the Orange Freeway (SR 57) and Santa Ana Freeway (I-5) to the west, the Garden Grove Freeway (SR 22) to the south, and the Eastern 314

GROWTH MANAGEMENT

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
GM-7
Transportation Corridor ( SR 241) to the east. The state and federal highway and freeway systems are therefore an integral part of the City’s transportation planning process.

Coordination with Caltrans and the Transportation Corridor Agencies regarding future improvements to these roadways is imperative to prevent unintended traffic impacts on the City’s roadway system.

Growth Management Areas
A significant effort in the transportation planning process will be undertaken by the City in its involvement in the GMAs established by the Regional Advisory Planning Committee. The purpose of the GMAs is to enable local jurisdictions to focus their mutual concern, coordinate improvements, and implement those improvements through an interjursidictional process.

City staff will work with staff from other cities represented in each of the GMAs to address the transportation issues identified by mutual consensus of the representatives of each GMA.

In addition, the City will continue to work with adjacent cities through existing formal agreements to fulfill any obligations not covered by the GMA activities. GMA activities do not supersede prior participative planning agreements between respective agencies.

Freeway System Deficiencies
Many of the transportation problems facing the City and Orange County are based on the inadequate capacity of freeways to serve peak period travel demands. This lack of capacity has resulted in poor levels of service, characterized by severe congestion and low travel speeds, as well as diversion to local streets during peak periods. The most severe congestion on the freeway system that affects the City’s roadway system occurs at the “Orange Crush,” where the Santa Ana, Orange, and Garden Grove Freeways come together. In addition, the Riverside Freeway is severely congested by commuters coming from the Inland Empire to jobs in the South Central Orange County area during peak periods. As freeways become more congested, additional impacts result on the City’s roadway system.

City Roadway Deficiencies
The Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) defines an arterial highway system intended to support and serve existing and projected land uses within both incorporated and unincorporated areas of the County. The arterial system is designed to serve as part of a balanced transportation system (autos, trucks, buses, bicycles, pedestrians, and emerging technologies). Smart Streets, Principal, Major and Primary Arterial Highways are intended to accommodate the bulk of intra -regional traffic and complement both the freeway system and the local street network. Secondary Arterials and Commuter Streets serve mainly as collectors which move traffic from local streets to the Smart Street, Principal, Major and Primary Arterial system.

As congestion continues to increase on the freeway system, more drivers will switch to using City arterials, particularly those parallel to freeways, or arterials serving the same trip destinations as the freeways. Consequently, these arterials, such as Tustin Street and Lincoln Avenue, will become increasingly congested at peak hours , pending improvements to the freeway system. Likewise, arterials providing access to the Costa Mesa and Garden Grove 315

GROWTH MANAGEMENT

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
GM-8
Freeways, such as Chapman, Katella, Lincoln, and Taft Avenues, are experiencing similar congestion. The Garden Grove Freeway has recently undergone a major renovation to add capacity and enhance safety. Chapman Avenue east of the Costa Mesa Freeway acts as the absent easterly extension of the Garden Grove Freeway , attempting without adequate capacity to serve a major population and recreational demand in east Orange and the South County area.

Level of Service Standards
Level of service is a qualitative measure that characterizes traffic congestion on a scale of A to F with LOS A representing a free -flow condition and LOS F representing extreme congestion. The LOS standard for traffic circulation in the City is LOS D for all roadway segments and signalized intersections. The circulation system shall be implemented in a manner that is designed to achieve LOS D or the current level; whichever is the farthest from LOS A. Intersections exempt from this standard include facilities under the jurisdiction of another City or the state; facilities that are part of the Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP); or those included on a Deficient Intersection List established by a GMA in which the City participates. LOS will be measured according to the procedures outlined in the LOS Policy Implementation Manual established by OCTA.

In order to achieve this standard, the City will require that the necessary improvements to transportation facilities identified as adversely impacted shall be completed prior to completion of a development project.

Achieving the adopted LOS standard and implementing exacted transportation improvements will also take into consideration extraordinary transportation circumstances that may affect identified intersections and/or timing of the required improvements. An example of an extraordinary circumstance would be when arterial roadways serve temporarily as substitute freeway access (thus affecting LOS performance) while construction of additional freeway improvements is underway.

Development Mitigation
New development in accordance with the policies of the Land Use Element may occur throughout the planning area over the next 20 years. Most new development will occur either within one of eight focus areas identified in the Land Use Element, or within the eastern portion of the planning area.

Infill Development within Focus Areas
Infill is the development of vacant sites in previously built -up areas. Infill development in Orange may occur in the future within eight focus areas as described in the Land Use Element. Much of this infill development will take the form of mixed -use residential, office , and commercial projects, designed to provide opportunities for people to live, work , and shop within more compact locations or districts. However, potential exists for infill development to further degrade traffic congestion on some of the City’s major arterial roadways, including South Main Street, Chapman Avenue, Katella Avenue, Tustin Street and La Veta Avenue. Growth management strategies for these area s focus on timely 316

GROWTH MANAGEMENT

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
GM-9
development of circulation system improvements related to infill development projects .

Strategies emphasize use of alternative transportation methods, particularly transit, within the focus area corridors.

New Development in East Orange
Most new development in Orange’s planning area will occur in currently undeveloped areas located generally east of Jamboree Road. This area is well served by the SR 241 and SR 261 toll roads, and future improvements to Santiago Canyon Road will provide arterial connections between the toll roads and future residential and commercial recreation areas.

This circulation system provides beneficial connections to those living in east Orange who travel north to Riverside County or south to Irvine or other destinations in the South County.

Growth management strategies for new development in east Orange focus on collecting transportation impact fees and ensuring that needed roadway improvements are completed in step with new development as new homes and businesses are occupied.

Traffic Impact Analysis and Fees
To ensure that traffic impacts associated with new development are adequately addressed, the City will require a Traffic Impact Analysis of all new projects, as required by the City’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines or at the discretion of the City Traffic Engineer when insufficient information is available to make a preliminary assessment of a proposal’s traffic impacts. The City will also ensure that new development pay for or implement its fair share of street improvement costs associated with development, including regional traffic mitigation.

The City will not use any new revenues generated from Measure M to pay for improvements incurred by a private development project.

The City will continue to collect transportation impact fees for improvements within its boundaries and will work with adjacent jurisdictions to ensure that an appropriate level of transportation impact fees is maintained within the GMAs. In the future, the City may also give consideration to a Deficient Intersection Fund Fee on all development contributing measurable impacts to intersections on the Deficient Intersection List of the Orange County CMP. This fee, if determined necessary, shall be approved by the jurisdictions in the GMA and locally administered as part of the City’s CIP.

Development Phasing
New development in the City will be required to establish a Development Phasing Program that links issuance of building permits for portion s of the development plan to roadway improvements required to achieve the appropriate LOS . D uring the development approval process, it will be determined whether to link to construction of the designated improvement(s) by others and/or link to construction of the designated improvement(s) at a certain time designated by the City.

The phasing plan must include an overall buildout plan which can demonstrate the ability of the infrastructure to support the planned development. The phasing plan for new projects will be a component of the development review and entitlement process and must be approved prior to issuance of building or grading permits. 317

GROWTH MANAGEMENT

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
GM-10
Annual Monitoring
The City will monitor the implementation of the Development Phasing Program for each new development projects on an annual basis and prepare an annual report , which will indicate the status of development approval in relationship to the status of the required traffic improvements.

GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION
The goals, policies, and plans identified in this Element are implemented through a variety of City plans, ordinances, development requirements, capital improvements, and ongoing collaboration with regional agencies and neighboring jurisdictions. Specific implementation measures for this Element are contained in the General Plan Appendix. 318

GROWTH MANAGEMENT

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
GM-11

Introduction and Vision for the Future ....................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the Growth Management Element ...................................................................................... 1 Scope and Content of the Growth Management Element ..................................................................... 1 Relationship to Other General Plan Elements ....................................................................................... 2 Definitions .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Table GM-1 Growth Management Terms Defined ............................................................................. 3 Measure M Requirements ..................................................................................................................... 4 Issues, Goals, and Policies ..................................................................................................................... 54 Growth Management Plan ......................................................................................................................... 6 Interjursidictional Coordination and Cooperation ................................................................................... 6 Growth Management Areas ................................................................................................................. 76 Freeway System Deficiencies ................................................................................................................ 7 City Roadway Deficiencies .................................................................................................................... 7 Level of Service Standards .............................................................................................................. 87 Development Mitigation ......................................................................................................................... 8 Infill Development within Focus Areas ............................................................................................... 8 New Development in East Orange ................................................................................................... 98 Traffic Impact Analysis and Fees ....................................................................................................... 9 Development Phasing ............................................................................................................................ 9 Annual Monitoring .............................................................................................................................. 109 Growth Management Implementation ................................................................................................... 109

319

NATURAL

RESOURCES

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
NR-1
REV. 12/8/15 (GPA 2014-0001)

INTRODUCTION AND VISION FOR THE FUTURE
Orange benefits from and relies upon its natural
resources, which include a variety of landforms that
provide the setting for the City, as well as the open
spaces and parks that define many of the
community’s neighborhoods. These amenities
provide visual relief from the intensity of urban
areas. Open spaces offer areas for passive and
active recreation, and for horticulture. They provide
habitat for plant and animal life. Used as parks, they
house facilities for recreational and civic activities
that are accessed by residents and visitors of all ages. Striking a balance between the built environment and Orange’s natural resources is vital to the long -term sustainability of the community. Such sustainability requires that growth occur in a responsible manner that allows natural resources to be preserved and enhanced for future generations.

Orange’s Vision for the Future is described in the General Plan Introduction . The Vision recognizes that the City’s quality of life will be judged by how well we connect with our surroundings. Therefore, this Element focuses on how Orange can maintain and create special places that bring us together, and how the City can reinforce connections between open spaces and the community, so that all of our residents and visitors can share and enjoy the outdoors and other activities. The Vision includes the following objectives related to Orange’s natural resources:
▪ Define neighborhoods through the use of open space areas and a trail system that provides a source of aesthetic beauty and recreational opportunities. These open space areas support a healthy and active community.
▪ Continue to protect our critical watersheds, such as Santiago Creek, and other significant natural and open space resources.
▪ Strive to build a comprehensive system of parks, open space, equestrian areas, scenic resources, and undeveloped natural areas, as well as a full array of recreational, educational, and cultural offerings such as sports, entertainment areas, and play facilities. ▪ Develop a connected multi -modal network for traveling from one end of town to the other that provides the option for residents from different neighborhoods to access parks, open spaces, and scenic areas by vehicle, transit, foot, bicycle or, where appropriate, by horse.
320

NATURAL RESOURCES

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
NR-2
The natural resources, open space, and parks and recreational facilities described throughout this Element are key physical components that are essential to the quality of life in Orange.

These facilities provide a variety of benefits. For example, open space provides recreational areas and wilderness areas. Urban parks provide relief and offer a soothing contrast to office, commercial, and residential areas. They provide for both active and passive recreational activities, and are key contributors to neighborhood identity and interaction.

Trails and bicycle paths offer non -motorized alternatives for getting around the City. In addition, modern day recreational and visual connections to the Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek are reminders of our Native American and agricultural heritage.

Orange’s General Plan combines two state-required General Plan elements – Open Space and Conservation – into a single Natural Resources Element. In addition to meeting other open space and conservation requirements, the Natural Resources Element also provides guidance regarding strategies for reducing urban runoff, maintaining water quality, preserving air quality and combating climate change within the City.

Purpose of the Natural Resources Element
The Natural Resources Element satisfies State requirements for the Open Space and Conservation Elements as stated in the Government Code Section 65302(d) and Section 65301(e). The goals and policies regarding nature conservation must adhere to the underlying intent of the Natural Communit ies Conservation Plan (NCCP ). The Natural Resources Element also includes an optional Parks and Recreation Element, under provisions of General Plan law, which includes designation of parks and recreation facilities to meet the requirements of the state’s Quimby Act imposed on cities and counties . The Quimby Act allows the City to collect exactions, in the form of impact fees, conservation easements , or park improvement fees from developer s by demonstrating a close relationship between the park demands of a project and the need for additional parkland or recreational facilities.

The purpose of the Natural Resources Element is to establish programs and policies for : (1) preservation and use of open space ; (2) renewable and non-renewable nature conservation; and, (3) parks and recreation. The scope of the Natural Resources Element spans areas of land and water used for open-space uses such as:
▪ preservation of renewable and non-renewable natural resources; ▪ managed production of resources, such as energy and groundwater supply; ▪ outdoor recreation; and
▪ trail-oriented recreational use.

Scope and Content of the Natural Resources Element
The Natural Resources Element contains goals and policies that reflect the community’s intent to preserve and efficiently operate programs associated with open spaces, natural resources, and recreational spaces. The Element is divided into three sections:
(1) Introduction
(2) Issues, Goals, and Policies
(3) Natural Resource Plans
The Issues, Goals, and Policies section identifies community open space, resource management, and recreational needs. This section also identifies goals and policies related to 321

NATURAL RESOURCES

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
NR-3
various natural resource issues. Goals are broad statements that reflect the City’s desires and guide the City regarding these issues. The policies provide directions for preserving open space, improving parks and recreation, and conserving natural resources. Implementation measures designed to promote achievement of goals and policies are provided in an Appendix to the General Plan.

Relationship to Other General Plan Elements
Successful achievement of the goals and policies within the Natural Resources Element depends, in part, upon their consistency with those of the other Elements in the General Plan. The Natural Resources Element most closely relates to the Land Use, Circulation & Mobility, Housing, Public Safety, and Cultural Resources & Historic Preservation Elements.

The Land Use Element identifies desired future uses for all lands within the City . Such uses include parks, recreational facilities, and public and privately owned open spaces to meet the needs of existing and future generations. The goals and policies of the Land Use Element assign location, intensity of use, and unit densities to properties that influence the contents of the Natural Resources Element. In addition, the Land Use Element provides for Transfer of Development Rights strategies that may increase the availability of future open space resources described in the Natural Resources Element.

The goals and policies of the Circulation & Mobility Element identify , and ensure access to , open spaces and recreational areas requiring access. The Circulation & Mobility Element assigns the location of streets and trail systems for pedestrians, bicyclists, and equestrians in open spaces. The Public Safety Element provides goals and policies addressing public health and safety within the City, including open space lands such as parks, trails, lakes, and wildland areas. Public health issues include natural and man-made hazards in open space. The Cultural Resources & Historic Preservation Element is a companion element to the Natural Resources Element, and provides policies and programs related to conservation of historic and cultural resources within Orange’s planning area.

ISSUES, GOALS AND POLICIES
The goals, policies, and implementation programs of the Natural Resources Element address seven issues: (1) preserving and expanding open space resources; (2) protecting air, water, energy, and land resources; (3) reducing greenhouse gas emissions and adapting to effects of climate change; (4) preserving significant ecological, biological, and mineral resources; (5) providing and expanding recreational facilities and programs; ( 6) creating a comprehensive trails network; and (7) preserving visual and aesthetic resources.

Open Space Resources
Open space areas are important biological, aesthetic, and recreational resources . They become increasingly valuable as the City develops and the landscape becomes more urbanized. Open spaces create buffers to development and provide both wildlife habitat and recreational opportunities.
322

NATURAL RESOURCES

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
NR-4
GOAL 1.0: Provide recreational use, scenic enjoyment, and the protection of natural resources and features in open space areas.

Policy 1.1: Conserve open space through various public-private funding mechanisms and management strategies including, but not limited to, conservation easements.

Policy 1.2: Actively seek out new public open space opportunities through land recycling.

Policy 1.3: Promote development of additional open spaces and access points adjacent to waterways and planned trails.

Air, Water, and Energy Resources
Orange lies within the heart of north -central Orange County, where the best qualities of Southern California living continue to attract new residents every year. Clean water and air, carefully managed land resources , and an efficient circulation network are critical elements of a healthy, sustainable City and watersheds. Orange will maintain and protect these resources through a range of measures to protect public health and quality of life.

GOAL 2.0: Protect air, water, and energy resources from pollution and overuse.

Policy 2.1: Cooperate with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and other regional agencies to implement and enforce regional air quality management plans.

Policy 2.2: Support alternative transportation modes , alternative technologies, and bicycle- and pedestrian -friendly neighborhoods to reduce emissions related to vehicular travel.

Policy 2.3: Reduce the amount of water used for landscaping through the use of native and drought -tolerant plants, proper soil preparation, and efficient irrigation systems as parks and other City facilities are built or renovated.

Policy 2.4: Encourage the production, distribution, and use of recycled and reclaimed water for landscaping projects, while maintaining urban runoff water quality objectives.

Policy 2.5: Continue to work toward local and regional waste -reduction and diversion / recycling goals and promote public education programs.

Policy 2.6: Encourage sustainable building and site designs for new construction and renovation projects.

Policy 2.7: Coordinate with energy suppliers to ensure adequate energy supplies to meet community needs, and to promote energy conservation and public education programs for that purpose.

Policy 2.8: Encourage development that incorporates pedestrian - and transit -oriented design and landscape elements.

Policy 2.9: Promote City operations as a model for energy efficiency and green building.

Policy 2.10: Work toward r eplacing existing City vehicles with ultra low or zero emission vehicles. At a minimum, new City vehicles shall be low emission vehicles as 323

NATURAL RESOURCES

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
NR-5
defined by the California Air Resources Board , except if certain vehicle types are not available in the marketplace . Public safety vehicles are exempted from this requirement.

Policy 2.11: Protect the ecological integrity and overall health of Orange’s watersheds.

Policy 2.12: Cooperate with water supply agencies to protect the quantity and quality of local groundwater supplies.

Policy 2.13: Control surface runoff water discharges into the stormwater conveyance system to comply with the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Permit and other regional permits issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Policy 2.14: Reduce pollutant runoff from new development by requiring the use of the most lowlow impact development impact practices and the most effective Best Management Practices (BMPs) currently available.

Policy 2.15: Minimize the amount of impervious surfaces and associated urban runoff pollutants in new development and significant redevelopment throughout the community.

Policy 2.16: Protect in-stream habitat and natural stream and channel features.

Policy 2.17: Educate City residents and businesses on the effects of urban runoff , and water and energy conservation strategies.

Climate Change
The scientific community believes that increasing levels of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the earth’s atmosphere are contributing to rising global average temperatures. The most abundant GHG is carbon dioxide (CO 2), which is a byproduct of fossil fuel combustion. CO 2 is removed from the atmosphere through sequestration by vegetation and dissolution into the ocean. Carbon sequestration is the absorption or removal from the air of carbon dioxide by plants or natural processes. These sequestration processes happen naturally, but human - generated emissions may be outpacing these removal processes, resulting in excessive GHG concentrations accumulating in the atmosphere, and leading to a subsequent trend of unnatural global warming.

GOAL 3.0: Prepare for and adapt to the effects of climate change and promote practices that decrease the City’s contribution to climate change.

Policy 3.1: Evaluate the potential effects of climate change on the City’s human and natural systems and prepare strategies that allow the City to appropriately respond and adapt.

Policy 3.2: Develop and adopt a comprehensive strategy to reduce greenhouse gasses (GHGs) within Orange by at least 15 percent from current levels by 2020.

Ecological, Biological and Mineral Resources
Wildlife habitat is crucial for the survival of native animal and plant species, and for maintaining the biodiversity of the City and larger Orange County region. Significant wildlife 324

NATURAL RESOURCES

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
NR-6
habitat can be found in the City’s undeveloped hillside areas, East Orange, and parks and open spaces (particularly near Santiago Creek, Santiago Oaks Regional Park, Irvine Regional Park, and Peters Canyon Regional Park) . Human-created landscaping is also an important environmental element, particularly in urban areas. Landscaping elements such as street trees contribute to an improved aesthetic and biological environment while providing a natural means of cleansing the air and minimizing urban heat. Sand and gravel resources in the planning area provide valuable sources of aggregate material for new construction.

These resources benefit the region as a whole. In accordance with guidelines established by the State Mining and Geology Board, City policy recognizes the need to protect these resources from premature urbanization.

The following goals and policies reflect the City’s desire to maintain and support prudent management of these important environmental resources.

GOAL 4.0: Conserve and protect wildlife habitat, plant and animal species of concern, and general biodiversity.

Policy 4.1: Preserve and protect native and habitat -supporting plant resources throughout the City.

Policy 4.2: Work with agencies , including the Orange County Flood Control District , to identify opportunities to enhance the natural qualities of Santiago Creek to protect habitat and reintroduce native plants and animals.

Policy 4.3: Reduce the impact of urban development on important ecological and biological resources.

Policy 4.4: Repair or improve ecological and biological conditions in the urban and natural environments when reviewing proposals for site development and redevelopment, as well as public improvements.

Policy 4.5: Protect the Santiago Creek and Santa Ana River corridors from premature urbanization to ensure the continued availability of important sand and gravel, flood control, water recharge, biological, and open space resources.

Recreational Facilities and Programs
The City’s active and passive recreational resources consist of designated parks, trails, and open space areas. Continued provision of recreational opportunities through preservation of open space, park maintenance and development, and the creation of new facilities will ensure improved quality of life for residents.

GOAL 5.0: Provide recreational facilities and programs that adequately serve the needs of residents.

Policy 5.1: Maintain existing City parks at levels that provide maximum recreational benefit to City residents.

Policy 5.2: Provide a range of high quality recreational facilities and programming to serve a broad cross section of residents , including youth, seniors, young adults, mature adults, and people with disabilities.
325

NATURAL RESOURCES

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
NR-7
Policy 5.3: Establish joint recreational use of open space land and facilities owned by school districts and/or the City.

Policy 5.4: Develop new public parks and open space resources by establishing incentives to use creative techniques available to property owners and developers that support public-private open space partnerships.

Policy 5.5: Explore and pursue new approaches to new park development and to providing a balanced mix of amenities and facilities.

Policy 5.6: Identify areas within the City that are currently underserved by existing open space, and develop programs to purchase land and build park amenities at a minimum level of 3 acres per 1,000 persons and the goal of 5 acres per 1,000 persons. Support provision of a total of 10 acres of parkland per 1,000 persons, inclusive of County regional parks within the planning area.

Policy 5.7: Consider the use of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) as a means to acquire and develop more publicly accessible open space.

Comprehensive Trails Network
Trails within the City serve important recreational and transportation needs, but are currently disconnected and in some areas incomplete. The Santiago Creek corridor has been recognized as a potential spine for a City-wide network of multi-use trails that connect parks, open spaces, recreational facilities, and other City amenities. Other opportunities to improve trail networks may include the conversion of active and inactive railroad rights -of-way to trails, and joint use of utility easements and flood control rights -of-way for trail purposes.

While providing for pedestrian, bicycle, and equestrian circulation, a trails network would also create a valuable greenway system throughout the City and would support the physical health and active lifestyle of Orange residents.

GOAL 6.0: Provide for alternative modes of transportation and access to recreational resources through a multi -use trail system that links the City’s parks and regional open space amenities.

Policy 6.1: Complete multi-use trail links throughout the City that serve recreational and circulation purposes as funding is available.

Policy 6.2: Ensure consistent, safe, and efficient maintenance of trails, and minimal impacts to the environment.

Policy 6.3: Work with the Rails -to-Trails Conservancy, surrounding residents, utility providers, flood control and water agencies, and community organizations to pursue the joint use of local rights-of-way and easements for multi-use trails.

Policy 6.4: Link existing equestrian trails and provide outlets to open space areas, particularly in the northeast region of the City, to reach regional parks such as Santiago Oaks, Irvine, Peters Canyon, and the Cleveland National Forest.

Policy 6.5: Ensure that the trail system has a safe interface with existing development.

Policy 6.6: Encourage an integrated relationship between trails and developed areas through the site planning and design of private development and trail projects.
326

NATURAL RESOURCES

ORANGE GENERAL PLAN
NR-8
Visual and Aesthetic Resources
Portions of Orange are characterized by scenic vistas that include hillsides, ridgelines, or open space areas that provide a unifying visual backdrop to the urban environment. These “viewsheds” contribute to the City’s identity and quality of life. The City will preserve open space areas and view corridors where possible and will encourage landscaping in urban areas to improve boulevards, neighborhoods, and commercial and industrial districts.

GOAL 7.0: Protect significant view corridors, open space , and ridgelines within the urban environment.

Policy 7.1: Preserve the scenic nature of significant ridgelines visible throughout the community.

Policy 7.2: Designate Santiago Canyon Road east of Jamboree Road as a City Scenic Highway to preserve the scenic nature of the open space adjacent to the road.

Policy 7.3: Encourage the development of landscaped medians and parkway landscaping along arterial streets in public and private projects, and encourage the state to provide freeway landscaping.

Policy 7.4: Coordinate with Southern California Edison and other utilities to place utility lines underground wherever possible.

Policy 7.5 Encourage the retention and enhancement of scenic corridors and visual focal points within the community.

NATURAL RESOURCE PLANS
The Natural Resources Element establishes the City’s approach to protect ing and enhancing its natural, open space , and recreation resources. The City has established goals and policies to preserve these resources. The following Natural Resource Plans provide an outline for future actions to conserve and improve the natural resources in Orange’s planning area.

Implementation programs, which describe and detail the City’s specific actions, are included in an Appendix to the General Plan.

Orange City CouncilJanuary 14, 2025

Orange City Council
January 14, 2025