RESOLUTION NO. XXXXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, ADOPTING
A POSITION OF OPPOSITION TO
PROPOSITION 50 ON THE NOVEMBER
2025 BALLOT
WHEREAS, Proposition 50, appearing on the November 2025 California ballot, proposes to amend the California Constitution to alter the process for drawing congressional districts; and WHEREAS, the current process, established by voters, assigns the responsibility for drawing congressional districts to the independent California Citizens Redistricting Commission, designed to operate in a non-partisan manner; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 50 would transfer the authority to draw congressional districts from the California Citizens Redistricting Commission to the State Legislature; and WHEREAS, the independent California Citizens Redistricting Commission was created to ensure fair and impartial district boundaries, including safeguards to keep cities, counties, and local communities together; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 50 would remove existing safegua rds intended to maintain the integrity of local communities in the redistricting process; and WHEREAS, Proposition 50 proposes dividing communities, forcing some cities and counties to be split among multiple congressional districts under the measure’s new maps and diminishing their voice in Congress; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orange recognizes the importance of maintaining a transparent and independent redistricting process to uphold public trust in electoral systems; and
WHEREAS, the City Council o f the City of Orange believes that Proposition 50 undermines the voter-approved framework for fair redistricting in California; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orange, California, hereby adopts an official position of opposition to Proposition 50 on the November 2025 ballot.
ADOPTED this ____ day of ___________________, 2025.
Daniel R. Slater, Mayor, City of Orange
2 ATTEST:
Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Wayne W. Winthers
Interim City Attorney, City of Orange
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF ORANGE )
I, PAMELA COLEMAN, City Clerk of the City of Orange, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Orange at a regular meeting thereof held on the ____ day of _______________, 2025, by t he following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Pamela Coleman, City Clerk, City of Orange
September 9, 2025
City Council Meeting
PowerPoint Presentations
Young Life Orange
September
2025
City Council
doesn’t feel worthy of being loved.
Over 40% of Gen Z
around the globe are concerned
with mental health
Almost 4 in 10 Gen Zers
believe they can make a difference in
the world
More 75% of Gen Z
are stressed by school and finances.
50% of Teens and Young Adults
turn to social media when
they’re feeling anxious.
Over 33% of Gen Z
showing up for
kids right where
they are
statistics found from Young Life’s
RELATE Project. Explore more by
scanning the QR code!
Loyal Responsible Calm Good
showing up for kids right where they are
GenZ wants to be known for
being:
statistics found from Young Life’s
RELATE Project. Explore more by
scanning the QR code!
3 needs of GenZ where
Young Life makes an impact
THEY NEED
RELATIONSHIPS
1 THEY NEED
CONNECTION
2 THEY NEED
HOPE
3 Going Where Kids Are
contact work
Discovering the Word Together
campaigners
Celebrating Relationships
club
Heaven on Earth
camp
Like-minded Adults Who Work Alongside Us
committee
how Young Life
is meeting kids
on their turf
contact work
club
campaigners
camp
committee
Meet Ju
our area
Orange
Current Ministries
Orange High School
Chapman University / Young Life College OC
Where do we want to go next?
Villa Park High School
Yorba Middle School
& Every High School + Middle School in Orange!!!
budget
partner with us
Give to Us
Giving.younglife.org/orang
e
Pray With Us
Pray for our leadership,
volunteers, kids and the
next kid to know Jesus!
Serve With Us
Join our Committee
Be a Volunteer
Leader
Host Club or
Breakfast
Campaigners
Care for our leaders
and kids
Follow Us On Social Media
@orangehighyounglife
@chapmanyounglife
City Council Presentation
534 Struck Ave. Orange, CA
Prologis Park Kyotanabe, Kyotanabe City, Kyoto, Japan.
Prepared for
CITY OF ORANGE – DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC)
Orange Industrial Center #6
22 1983
Founded
100
Global most sustainable
corporations
PLD
NYSE, S&P 500 member
1.3 BSF
20 countries / four continents
#2 in Solar
Rank in U.S. for onsite solar
installations, SEIA
6,500
Customers
U.S.
800 MSF
3,822 Buildings Other Americas
129 MSF
623 Buildings
Europe
251MSF
1,151 Buildings Asia
1113 MSF
288 Buildings
A2/A
Credit rating
Prologis At-A-Glance
3 Southern California (OC, LA, IE)
548 buildings, 717 customers, 126.2 MSF, 8,000 acres
Orange County
67 buildings with 49 customers, 7.8 MSF, 495 acres
City of Orange
5 buildings with 4 customers, 2.3 MSF, 52 acres
PROLOGIS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
4 RECENT ORANGE COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
• Home Aid
• The Hub OC
• Santiago Canyon College
• Love Orange
• Orange International Street Fair
SUSTAINABILITY AND COMMUNITY
5 Prologis is committed to achieve Net-Zero emissions in our operations (by 2030) and across our value chain (by 2040):
100% carbon neutral construction by 2030
Carbon reduction in construction materials
LEED Silver certification minimum
30-year roof systems and 5 PSF collateral load for solar ready Upgraded “micro-grid” electrical switchgear
Advanced (smart) metering of house and tenant electric meters 100 % LED lighting in warehouse and offices space
Efficient HVAC equipment in the office
EV charging for auto and trucks
Whole Building Life Cycle Assessments to record carbon impacts
GLOBAL ESG LEADERSHIP
6 Prologis team attended the Santiago Canyon College
Career Day Oct. 2024
Prologis team at
the Home Aid
Diaper Drive in
May 2025
Prologis team sponsored the Home Aid Project Playhouse event Oct. 2024.
Prologis team donated gift bags to
the Home Aid Holiday Gift Drive in
December 2024
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
7 Offsite Infrastructure Improvements:
Upgrading exiting pavement on Struck
Ave. (from the Cul de sac to Batavia)
Installing new sidewalk, curb and
gutter, and landscaping along Struck
Ave. frontage
Jobs:
Creation of 120 ~200 direct well-paying
local jobs
Creation of union construction jobs
Fiscal impact to the city’s general fund:
Property taxes
Sales taxes
Permit and development fees
Annual taxes
LONG-TERM ECONOMIC BENEFIT
9 OPTIONAL SLIDES
10 Changes from the DRC review:
• 6’ fence facing Struck Ave relocated to behind of the landscape area Design – Changes from DRC
11 Changes from the DRC review:
• Trees at the entries upsized to 36”
• Drought resistant trees and shrubs proposed
Design – Changes from DRC
Marina Strawberry
Arbutus Marina
12 Discussion on Truck Route
13 Discussion on Neighboring Properties
14 Approved Truck Terminal Design
15 16
INTRO
Consultant Team:
Architect: HPA
Civil Engineer: Webb
Landscape: Hunter
CEQA: T&B Planning
1. Who is Prologis?
2. Our Sustainability Practice
3. Benefits that We are Bringing to the Community
COMPREHENSIVE
CITYWIDE FEE STUDY
RESULTS
CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA
2 BACKGROUND / INTRODUCTION
City last conducted a fee study in 2018.
Best practice is to conduct Fee Studies every 5-7 years. Developed a Full Cost Allocation Plan to capture the indirect costs associated with fee-related services.
Compliance with state regulations.
COMPREHENSIVE CITYWIDE FEE STUDY RESULTS
3 STUDY OBJECTIVES
STREAMLINE FEE
STRUCTURE
Consolidate, Expand, Add /
Remove Fees
LEGAL COMPLIANCE
Compliance with Prop 218
& 26
TIME ASSUMPTIONS
Identify the average level
of effort associated with
activities
COMPARATIVE SURVEY
Benchmark against other
jurisdictions
FULLY BURDENED
HOURLY RATES
Determine direct and
indirect costs
MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Provide all existing and
proposed fees in a
comprehensive manner
COMPREHENSIVE CITYWIDE FEE STUDY RESULTS
4COMPREHENSIVE CITYWIDE FEE STUDY RESULTS
TIME ESTIMATE
FULLY BURDENED
HOURLY RATE
FULL COST FEE
Average staff time by position title spent per permit, application, or fee-related activity.
Salaries, Benefits, Productive Hours, Services & Supplies, Supervisory Support, and Citywide Overhead from Cost
Allocation Plan.
Maximum justifiable fee that can be assessed
FEE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY
5 FEE STUDY RESULTS
Reviewed 694 fee line items – across all City Departments Added new flat fees for building services, but retained the detailed occupancy, square footage, and construction type fees for new construction / tenant improvements.
Added new flat fees for Planning services for administrative services that don’t require deposits.
Consolidated Community service fee categories to streamline the rentals but also capture programming.
COMPREHENSIVE CITYWIDE FEE STUDY RESULTS
6COMPREHENSIVE CITYWIDE FEE STUDY RESULTS
FEE STUDY RESULTS (2)
Service Area Total Revenue Total Annual Cost Difference Cost Recovery % Building $1,628,163 $2,198,406 ($570,243) 74%
City Clerk $10,935 $13,625 ($2,690) 80%
Code Enforcement $1,965 $7,789 ($5,824) 25%
Community Services $501,329 $2,009,526 ($1,508,197) 25% Public Works $764,933 $1,163,424 ($398,491) 66%
Finance $665,281 $679,262 ($13,981) 98%
Fire Prevention $241,527 $284,784 ($43,256) 85%
Library $57,984 $248,547 ($190,563) 23%
Planning $361,110 $542,784 ($181,674) 67%
Police $63,594 $87,494 ($23,900) 73%
Total $4,296,821 $7,235,640 ($2,938,819) 59%
7 COST RECOVERY COMPARISON
COMPREHENSIVE CITYWIDE FEE STUDY RESULTS
8COMPREHENSIVE CITYWIDE FEE STUDY RESULTS
Seek input from Council on where / how to
set fees (Master Fee schedule attachment).
Adopt an annual fee escalator (CPI or
COLA), recommended to ensure annual
cost increases keep up with fee increases.
Reevaluate fees again in 5-7 years based on
organizational / technological changes.
NEXT STEPS