Orange City Council
September 22, 2026

Citywide Speed
Limit Assessment
Appendices
211 Imperial Highway, Suite 208, Fullerton, CA 92835 || (714) 992-4592 || [email protected] Prepared for
August 2026
Prepared by
ATTACHMENT 7

APPENDIX A
Regulations Governing Speed Limits
and Definition of Terms
Excerpts from California Vehicle Code
Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43)
AGA Engineers, Inc.
211 Imperial Highway, Suite 208, Fullerton, CA 92835
(714) 992-4592 Email: [email protected]

RADAR SPEED ZONE SURVEYS
Applicable Vehicle Code Sections
Business District
235. A “business district: is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent of more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distance specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists.

Business and Residence District: Determination
240. In determining whether a highway is within a business or residence district, the following limitations shall apply and shall qualify the definitions Section 235 and 515:
a) No building shall be counted unless its entrance faces the highway and the front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway.
b) Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways, only those buildings facing each roadway separately shall be counted for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a district.
c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs and public buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures. d) A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.

Residence District
515. A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling housed or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.

Engineering and Traffic Survey
627. (a) “Engineering and traffic survey” as used in this Code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by the state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.

Radar Speed Zone Surveys

2) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. 3) Accident records.
4) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

Rounding Speed Limit to the Nearest 5 mph of the 85th Percentile 21400. (a) The Department of Transportation shall, after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices placed pursuant to this code, including, but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroad warning approach signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stock crossing signs placed pursuant to Section 21364.
(b) The Department of Transportation shall, after notice and public hearing, determine and publicize the specifications for uniform types of warning signs, lights, and devices to be placed upon a highway by a person engaged in performing work that interferes with or endangers the safe movement of traffic upon that highway. (c) Only those signs, lights, and devices as are provided for in this section shall be placed upon a highway to warn traffic of work that is being performed on the highway. (d) Control devices or markings installed upon traffic barriers on or after January 1, 1984, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications required by this section.

Maximum Speed Limit
22349. (a) Except as provided in Section 22356, no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person may drive a vehicle upon a two-lane, undivided highway at a speed greater than 55 miles per hour unless that highway, or portion thereof, has been posted for a higher speed by the Department of Transportation or appropriate local agency upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. For purposes of this subdivision, the following apply:
(1) A two-lane, undivided highway is a highway with not more than one through lane of travel in each direction.
(2) Passing lanes may not be considered when determining the number of through lanes.

Radar Speed Zone Surveys

(c) It is the intent of the Legislature that there be reasonable signing on affected two-lane, undivided highways described in subdivision (b) in continuing the 55 miles-per-hour speed limit, including placing signs at county boundaries to the extent possible, and at other appropriate locations.

Basic Speed Law
22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

Speed Law Violations
22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.

Prima Facie Speed Limits
22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and the same shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver’s approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. 3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code.
2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. Such prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard “SCHOOL” warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.

Radar Speed Zone Surveys

3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented.

A local authority may request grant funding from the Active Transportation Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.

Increase of Local Limits
22357. (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may be by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hours, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.

Decrease of Local Limits
22358. (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45,40,35,30, or 25 miles per hours, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.

Decrease on Narrow Street
22358.3. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour in a business or residence district or in a public park on any street having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width, other than a state highway, is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.

Radar Speed Zone Surveys

Decrease on Local Streets Near Schools or Senior Centers 22358.4. (a) (1) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by subdivision (b) of Section 22352 is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey. (2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (b) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
(A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour.
(B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the school zone.
(3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel.
(4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration. (5) (A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (B) For purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away Radar Speed Zone Surveys

from school grounds.
(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at any distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from the school grounds.
(D) A local authority shall reimburse the Department of Transportation for all costs incurred by the department under this subdivision.

Downward Speed Zoning
22358.5 It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

Rounding of Speed Limits to the Nearest 5 mph of the 85th Percentile 22358.6. (a) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise and thereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic. (b) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded down to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may lower the speed limit by five miles per hour from the nearest five mile per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with Sections 627 and 22358.5 and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on March 30, 2021, if the reasons for the lower speed limit are documented in an engineering and traffic survey. The Department of Transportation or a local authority may also take into consideration Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, if applicable. (c) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment. If the speed limit is rounded down pursuant to this subdivision, the speed limit shall not be reduced any further pursuant to subdivision (b). (d) In addition to subdivisions (b) and (c), a local authority may additionally lower the speed limit as provided in Section 22358.7.
(e) The total reduction in the speed limit pursuant to subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, shall not exceed 12.4 miles per hour from the 85th percentile speed. (f) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (e), inclusive, a local authority may retain the currently adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction.

Reduction of Additional 5 mph
22358.7. (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
(1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2) The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high Radar Speed Zone Surveys

concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused. (b) (1) As used in this section, “safety corridor” shall be defined by the Department of Transportation in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. In making this determination, the department shall consider highways that have the highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may be derived from, but not limited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System. (2) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, determine what constitutes land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a). In making this determination, the department shall consider density, road use type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway. (c) A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government Code, whichever is sooner. (d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Retaining the Currently Adopted Speed Limit or Restoring Immediately Prior Adopted Speed Limit 22358.8 (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit.
(b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Business Activity District
22358.9 (a) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour.
(2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit. (C) A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit. (b) As used in this section, a “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, Radar Speed Zone Surveys

or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway. (3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Section 22358.7, has retained the currently adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8, or has restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8. (d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Boundary Line Streets
22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.

Multiple-Lane Highways
22361. On multiple-lane highways with two or more separate roadways, different prima facie speed limits may be established for different roadways under any of the procedures specified in Sections 22354 to 22359, inclusive.

Speed Trap Prohibition
40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.

Speed Trap
40802. (a) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit provided by this code or by local ordinance pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic devices which measures the speed of moving objects. This subdivision does not apply to local street, road, school zone, senior zone, business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8.

Radar Speed Zone Surveys

(b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section, “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. (3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352.
(4) For purposes of this section, “business activity district” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section.
(c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(C)(i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D).
(ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 223469, 22356, or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three Radar Speed Zone Surveys

years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
(B) (i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II)If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years.
(ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8.

Speed Trap Evidence.
40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap.
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) 40802.

Radar Speed Zone Surveys

Study Method
Speed zones are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from unreasonable and reckless drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.

The study is conducted in accordance with the appropriate sections of the California Vehicle Code and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), Section 2B-13, Speed Limit Sign (R2-D)
Surveys are conducted on arterial streets, collector streets, and selected local streets. Each of the selected streets was analyzed individually.

The accident analysis was based on a review of the City’s Traffic Accident Records (Crossroads). Only non-intersection accidents are included since intersection accidents are considered correctable using conventional intersection traffic controls such as stop signs or traffic signals.

Accident rates were computed using a formula that takes into account the number of accidents in the two-year period, the length of roadway being studied, and the average daily traffic volume. The rate is expressed in accidents per million vehicle miles (Acc/MVM). The formula is:

Acc/MM = Number of Accidents x 1,000,000
Distance x ADT x No. of Days
Definitions of Terms
Average Daily Traffic Volume of traffic during a 24-hour period.

ECL Easterly City Limit (also WCL, NCL and SCL for Westerly, Northerly and Southerly).
85th Percentile (Critical Speed) The “speed” which 85% of the observed vehicles are not exceeding.

This speed is usually within 2 mph of the upper limit of the speed.

Mean Speed The average speed.

MPH or mph Miles Per Hour.

MVM or mvm Million Vehicle Miles. Accident rates are generally expressed as the number of accidents occurring per million vehicle miles traveled during a given time period.

Pace The 10 mph range of observed vehicle speeds containing the largest number of vehicles. A normal distribution will contain
approximately 70% of the sample within the pace, with 15% above and 15% below.

APPENDIX B
Speed Zoning Regulations from Caltrans
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricade, and Gates January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs

SPEED LIMIT SIGNS AND PLAQUES
Section 2B.21 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1)
Support:
01 In general, the maximum speed limits applicable to rural and urban roads are established:

A. Statutorily – a maximum speed limit applicable to a particular class of road, such as freeways or city streets, that is established by State law; or
B. As speed zones – based on engineering studies.
02 State statutory limits might restrict the maximum speed limit that can be established on a particular road, notwithstanding what an engineering study might indicate. 03 Agencies with designated authorities to set speed limits, which include States, and sometimes local jurisdictions, can establish non-statutory speed limits or designate reduced speed zones using an engineering study. Setting appropriate speed limits is especially important to ensure safety for all road users in varying types of contexts, particularly on roadways where adjacent land use suggests that trips could be served by varied modes. These situations include urban and suburban non-freeway arterials or rural arterials that serve as main streets in smaller communities, consistent with the context classifications of urban core, urban, suburban, and rural towns found in “A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,” 2018 Edition, AASHTO. When setting a speed limit, a range of factors such as land-use context, pedestrian and bicyclist activity, crash history, intersection spacing, driveway density, roadway geometry, roadside conditions, roadway functional classification, traffic volume, and observed speeds can influence the speed limit determined in the engineering study. The engineering study will determine which of the recommended factors will prevail in setting the speed limit. 04 Jurisdictions can use speed limit setting tools and methods such as expert systems and those consistent with the safe system approach as part of the required engineering study for a non-statutory speed limit. As speed limit setting tools vary, jurisdictions need to be aware of their limitations and advantages, possible variation between the tools and the need to explore gaps or weaknesses of tools, and weigh the output accordingly in consideration of setting speed limits. 04a The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public confidence. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws, speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public. Artificially low speed limits can lead to poor compliance as well as large variations in speed within the traffic stream. Increased speed variance can also create more conflicts and passing maneuvers.
05 To achieve desired operating speeds, agencies often implement other speed management strategies concurrently with setting speed limits, such as traffic calming measures, geometric design features, speed safety cameras, and increased enforcement.
05a The most effective way to reduce speeds is through a combination of strategies using traffic control devices related to speed management, roadway design and engineering solutions, traffic calming techniques and measures, public education, and enforcement efforts. Effectively managing road user speed relies on numerous factors, which include enforcement, roadway characteristics, surrounding environment, adjacent land use, and traffic control devices. Many studies find that engineering changes, such as change a road’s infrastructure, are one of the most important factors in reducing vehicle operating speeds. Engineering changes are also one of the most effective interventions at reducing pedestrian injury and fatality rates. Potential street engineering changes, such as curb extensions, median islands, raised crosswalks, roundabouts, and speed bumps or speed humps, naturally result in lower speeds. It is realized that these engineering changes can be costly and time-consuming to implement.

Standard:
06 Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS), also noted as an engineering study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall consider the roadway context.

Guidance:
07 The engineering study should consider the roadway context. Among the factors that should be considered when conducting an engineering study for establishing or reevaluating speed limits within speed zones are the following:

A. Roadway environment not readily apparent to the driver (CVC § 627) (such as roadside development, number and frequency of driveways and access points, and land use), functional classification, public transit volume and California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricade, and Gates January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
location or frequency of stops, parking practices, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities and activity; B. Roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the driver (CVC § 627) (such as lane widths, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, median type, and sight distance);
C. Geographic context (such as an urban district, rural town center, non-urbanized rural area, or suburban area residential district, business district, business activity district), and multi-modal trip generation; D. Reported crash experience for at least a 12 36-month period; E. Speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles including the pace, median (50th-percentile), and 85th- precentile percentile speeds; and
F. A review of past speed studies to identify any trends in operating speeds (CVC § 22358.8) Support:
07a Refer to FHWA’s List of Known Errors for error in Paragraph 7, Item E text. Refer to Section 1A.04 for more details.

Guidance:
08 When the 85th-percentile speed is appreciably greater than the posted speed limit, and the roadway context does not support setting a higher speed limit, the engineering (not E&TS) study should consider whether changes to geometric features, enforcement, and/or other speed-reduction countermeasures might improve compliance with the posted speed limit. A similar approach should be used if the results of past speed studies indicate that the 85th-percentile speed has consistently increased.
09 On urban and suburban arterials, and on rural arterials that serve as main streets through developed areas of communities, the 85th-percentile speed should not be used to set speed limits without consideration of all factors described in Paragraph 7 of this Section.

Standard:
10 On a freeway, expressway, or rural highway (outside urbanized locations or conditions), On a highway, the speed limit that is posted within a speed zone should shall be within 5 mph 12.4 mph of the 85th-percentile speed of freeflowing motor-vehicle traffic under the following conditions:

A. All factors described in Paragraph 7 of this Section have been considered and determined to be nonmitigating.

B. The measures described in Paragraph 8 of this Section have been considered to the extent practicable.

Guidance:
11 State and local agencies should conduct engineering studies to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review (such as changes to roadway context, the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes, changes to road geometrics, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes).
12 Speed studies for signalized intersection approaches should be taken outside the influence area of the traffic control signal, which is generally considered to be approximately ½ mile, to avoid obtaining skewed results for the speed distribution. If the signal spacing is less than 1 mile, the speed study should be at approximately the middle of the segment.

Support:
12a Speed limits in California are governed by the CVC, §§ 22348 through 22413; also, pertinent sections are found in §§ 627 and 40802 and others referenced in this section. Refer to Section 1A.05 for information regarding this publication. 12b Refer to Part 6, Section 6B.01 for speed limit signs in temporary traffic control zones. Refer to Part 7 for speed limit signs in school areas.

Basic Speed Law and Prima Facie Speed Limits – Refer to CVC §§ 22350 & 22352 12c The basic speed law states “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.”
Standard:
12d Prima facie speed limits are specific limits and shall apply unless changed based upon an E&TS and signs are posted that display the new speed limit.

Option:
12e Prima facie speed limits may be preempted by the basic speed law, when roadway, traffic or weather conditions warrant a lower speed.

California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricade, and Gates January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
Legal Authority for Establishing Speed Limits
Support:
12f Delegation of legal authority to set speed limits based on valid E&TS on State highways is given to Caltrans District Directors.

The District Director of each transportation district is authorized to issue orders regulating the speed of traffic, up to 70 mph on State highways. The Director of Caltrans retains the authority to approve variable, and minimum speed limits on State freeways.

Standard:
12g The speed limits shown in Table 2B-101(CA) shall apply, unless changed upon the basis of an E&TS.

Option:
12h The speed limits shown in Table 2B-102(CA) may apply, unless changed upon E&TS.

Variable Speed Limits on Freeways - Refer to CVC § 22355 12i The following speed limits may apply:
• Whenever Caltrans determines based upon an E&TS that the safe and orderly movement of traffic upon any freeway segment will be facilitated by the establishment of variable speed limits • Caltrans may erect, regulate, and control signs upon the state highway which is a freeway, or any portion thereof, which, if used, signs shall be designed to permit display of different speeds at various times of the day or night. • Such signs need not conform to the standards & specifications per CVC § 21400, but if used, shall be of sufficient size and clarity to give adequate notice of the applicable speed limit.

Minimum Speed Limits on State Highways - Refer to CVC § 22400 12j The following speed limits may apply:
• Whenever Caltrans determines based upon an E&TS that slow speeds on any part of a state highway consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, Caltrans may determine and declare a minimum speed limit. Appropriate signs giving notice shall then be installed on that segment. • A motorist can be cited for stopping or impeding the normal and reasonable movement of traffic unless the stop is necessary for safe operation and in compliance with the law.

Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
Support:
12k CVC § 627 defines the term “Engineering and traffic survey” and lists its requirements.

Standard:
12l An E&TS shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by Caltrans, consideration of all of the following:

A. Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.

B. Collision records.

C. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Guidance:
12m The E&TS should contain sufficient information to document that the required three items of CVC § 627 are provided and that other conditions not readily apparent to a driver are properly identified. 12n Prevailing speeds are determined by a speed zone survey. A speed zone survey should include:

A. The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.

B. Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed measuring devices; or, C. Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing vehicles may be used.

D. A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section. If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each section.

Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs.

E. Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.

F. The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing.

G. The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.

California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricade, and Gates January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
H. In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.

I. Short speed zones of less than 0.5 miles should be avoided, except in transition areas.

J. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.

K. Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.

Support:
12o Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. Refer to CVC § 22358.5.

Option:
12p When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider all of the following findings:

A. Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:

1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 miles, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 miles the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 miles but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph 1 or 2 above.

B. Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. 12q The following two forms may be used to document speed zoning based on an E&TS to establish speed limits:

1. State Highways - The E&TS for State highways is made under the direction of the Caltrans District traffic engineer. Long form should be used to document the data and reports including:
a. One copy of Speed Zone Survey Sheet (Refer to Figure 2B-101(CA)) showing:
• A north arrow
• Name and/or highway number of the route to be zoned
• Post Mile or other distance measurement
• Limits of the proposed zones for each direction of travel • Roads and crossroad names, number and width of lanes, indicate parking restrictions • Appropriate notations showing type of roadside development, such as “scattered business,” “solid residential,” etc.

Schools adjacent to the highway are shown, but other buildings need not be plotted unless they are a factor in the speed recommendation or the point of termination of a speed zone. • Collision rates for the zones involved
• Annual average daily traffic volume
• Location of traffic signals, signs and markings
• If the highway is divided, the limits of zones for each direction of travel • Plotted 85th percentile and pace speeds at location taken showing speed profile b. A report to the District Director that includes:
• The reason for the initiation of speed zone survey.
• Recommendations and supporting reasons.
• The enforcement jurisdictions involved and the recommendations and opinions of those officials. • The stationing or reference post in mileage at the beginning and ending of each proposed zone and any intermediate equations. Location ties must be given to readily identifiable physical features.

2. Roadways under the jurisdiction of City or County:
a. Short form may be used for documenting speed zoning (Figure 2B-104(CA)). b. Determination of Speed Limits - Figures 2B-103(CA) & 2B-104(CA) show examples of data sheets which may be used to record speed observations. Specific types of vehicles may be tallied by use of letter symbols in appropriate squares. 12r In most situations, the short form for local streets and roads will be adequate; however, the procedure or long form used on State highways may be used at the option of the local agency.

California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricade, and Gates January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
Guidance:
12s The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as studies have shown that establishing a speed limit less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers.

Support:
12t Generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver are identified in collision histories. 12u Speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed. Pace speed is defined as the 10 mph increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles (Refer to Figure 2B-102(CA)). The lower limit of the pace is plotted on the Speed Zone Survey Sheets as an aid in determining the proper zone limits. Speed limits higher than the 85th percentile speed are not generally considered reasonable and prudent. Speed limits below the 85th percentile speed does not ordinarily facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and require constant enforcement to maintain compliance. Speed limits established on the basis of the 85th percentile speed conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals. 12v The majority of drivers comply with the basic speed law. Speed limits set at or near the 85th percentile speed provide law enforcement officers with a limit to cite drivers who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent. Further studies show that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile (Critical Speed) generally results in an increase in collision rates.

Option:
12w When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, as indicated in collision records, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified. Concurrence and support of enforcement officials are necessary for the successful operation of a speed zone.

Guidance:
12x Speed zones of less than 0.5 miles in rural locations, 0.25 miles for urban locations, and short transition zones should be avoided.

Support:
12y Any existing E&TS that was performed before January 1, 2022 in accordance with previous traffic control device standards is not required to be updated until it is due for reevaluation per the 5, 7 or 14 year criteria. An E&TS can originally exist for 7 years and may be extended to 14 years if the conditions are met.

CVC § 22358.6 – 85th-Percentile speed, Rounding, 5 mph Increment, 5 mph speed reduction and Maximum Speed Reduction Standard:
12z When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic (CVC § 22358.6(a)), except as shown in the two Options described in paragraphs 12aa and 12ab, or if using additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation (CVC § 22358.7(a)(1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians (CVC § 22358.7(a)(2)).

Option:
12aa For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC §§ 627 and 22358.5.

CVC §§ 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, may also be considered, if applicable. Refer to Standard below for documentation requirements. Refer to CVC § 22358.6(b).
12ab For cases in which rounding the 85th-percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. Refer to CVC § 21400(b). Refer to CVC § 22358.6(c).

Standard:
12ac If 5 mph reduction is applied to the 85th percentile speed after it is rounded to the nearest 5 mph increment and the required rounding is a rounding down, to establish posted speed limit, an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the 5 mph reduction and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC §§ 627 and 22358.5. Refer to § 22358.6(b). 12ad If the 85th percentile speed is rounded down to the lower 5 mph increment, in cases in which the 85th percentile speed California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricade, and Gates January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
needs to round up to the nearest 5 mph increment, to establish posted speed limit, the speed limit shall not be reduced any further pursuant to CVC § 22358.6(b).
12ae The total reduction from the 85th percentile speed shall not exceed 12.4 mph. Refer to CVC § 22358.6(e).

Support:
12af Refer to Table 2B-103(CA), which provides examples of 85th-percentile speed values and the application of the speed limit policies and criteria applicable per CVC §§ 22358.6 and 22358.7.

CVC § 22358.7 – Safety corridor and Land or Facilities Generating High Concentrations of Bicyclists and Pedestrians Standard:
12ag Additional lowering of the speed limits from standards, as included in paragraph 12z and Options as described in paragraphs 12aa, and 12ab, is prohibited, except for the roadway segments designated as “safety corridor” or “land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians” in compliance with CVC §§ 22358.6(d) and 22358.7.

Option:
12ah Caltrans or local authority may additionally lower the speed limits by 5 mph from the final value determined based on paragraphs 12z, 12aa and 12ab if, after completing an E&TS, it finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, for either of the following reasons:

1. The portion of a highway has been designated as a safety corridor.

2. The portion of highway meets the definition of land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians.

CVC § 22358.7(a)(1) – “Safety Corridor” Definition
Standard:
12ai A safety corridor shall be defined as a roadway segment within an overall roadway network where the highest number of serious injury and fatality crashes occur.
12aj One or more crash weighting factors as provided in paragraph 12ak of this section shall be used to prioritize the locations of fatal and serious injury crashes in developing the “Safety Corridor”.

Option:
12ak The crash weighting factors to prioritize the locations of fatal and serious injury crashes in developing the "Safety Corridor" may include, but are not limited to, the factors included in Table 2B-104(CA). 12al Data used to determine a safety corridor may be from the most recent E&TS performed. The crash data source may include, but is not limited to, California Highway Patrol’s (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS).

Standard:
12am The prioritized subset of safety corridors shall:

1. Identify specific locations with high crash occurrences.

2. Identify corridor-level segments with a pattern of crash reoccurrence.

3. Be able to be stratified by mode.
12an Safety corridors shall represent a prioritized subset of the overall roadway network within an authority’s responsibilities and shall not exceed one-fifth of the overall roadway network.

Guidance:
12ao A jurisdiction should use three to five years of the most recent crash data to determine a safety corridor based on Fatal and Serious Injury data.

Option:
12ap For crash coverage, safety corridors may identify the subset of the overall roadway network where a minimum of 25% of the Fatal + Serious Injury (F+SI) crashes occur.
12aq To identify logical termini, the geographic extent of a safety corridor may be determined by non-engineering staff.

Standard:
12ar A licensed professional engineer shall sign off on logical termini identified for a safety corridor using existing E&TS.

Option:
12as Crash/Volume rate may be used to provide additional locations to be included in the safety corridor. Local agencies may use proactive measures as indicators.

CVC § 22358.7(a)(2) – “Land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians” definition California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricade, and Gates January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
Standard:
12at A land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians shall be defined as the portion of the highway where one or more of any of the generators listed in Table 2B-105(CA) are present within a distance of 1320 feet longitudinally of highway, and meets condition specified in paragraph 12au. 12au Crash data demonstrates the highway segment is within the top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injuries over a three-to-five-year.
12av A highway segment shall be defined as the portion of the highway where a location that meets the aforementioned criteria is present within a distance of 1320 feet longitudinally of highway.

Option:
12aw A highway segment may be longer than 1320 feet longitudinally of highway provided that a minimum of one location within the top twenty percent of fatal and serious injury pedestrian and/or bicyclist crashes within a three-to-five-year period is present for every 1320 feet.

Standard:
12ax The top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injury crashes within a three to five year period shall be based on the geographic area within the jurisdiction.

Option:
12ay A high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists may be longer than 1320 feet longitudinally of highway provided that a minimum of one generator is present for every 1320 feet. 12az Data used to determine high concentration locations may be obtained from the most recently performed E&TS.

CVC § 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) 12ba Caltrans or a local authority may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit on a highway that is not a freeway without further reduction as provided in CVC § 22358.8.

Standard:
12bb Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by Caltrans Director’s Order for SHS or local ordinance for highways under local jurisdiction, if after completing an E&TS, Caltrans or a local authority finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit. 12bc If Caltrans or a local authority decides to use lower speed limit based on CVC § 22358.8, after completing an E&TS and finding that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, it shall not be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. Refer to CVC § 22358.8(b). 12bd CVC § 22358.8 shall not be applicable to a roadway that is a freeway.

CVC § 22358.9 – Business Activity District
Option:
12be Caltrans or a local authority may, by Caltrans Director’s Order for SHS or local ordinance for highways under local jurisdiction, determine and declare a 25 or 20 mph prima facie speed limit on a highway that is not a freeway and that is contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 mph if the highway segment meets all of the following conditions:

1. A maximum of four traffic lanes.

2. A maximum posted 30 mph prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 mph speed limit.

3. A maximum posted 25 mph prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 mph speed limit.
12bf A “business activity district” is that portion of a highway that is not a freeway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets a least three of the following four requirements:

4. No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.

5. Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway.

California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricade, and Gates January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs

6. Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.

7. Marked crosswalk(s) not controlled by a traffic control device.

Standard:
12bg Caltrans or a local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit on a portion of a highway where it has already lowered the speed limit as permitted for designated safety corridors (CVC § 22358.7) or using the land or facility adjacent to high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists (CVC § 22358.7) or retained the currently adopted speed limit (CVC § 22358.8) or have restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit (CVC § 22358.8). Refer to CVC § 22358.9(c). 12bh CVC § 22358.9 shall not be applicable to a roadway that is a freeway.

Support:
12bi CVC §§ 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies are also applicable on any privately owned and maintained roads or commercial establishments, if the private road or private property has been subjected to the CVC application by the private property owner or a particular city or county enacts an ordinance or resolution to this effect. Refer to CVC §§ 21100, 21100.1, 21107, 21107.5, 21107.6, and 21107.7.

Truck Speed Zone on Descending Grades
Guidance:
12bj Highway descending grades, if used for posting TRUCK Speed Limit signs (R2-1 and M4-4P) for trucks travelling downhill, should have recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles. Descending grades shorter than 1 mile should be avoided for posting signs because deceleration of vehicles due to braking action can generally provide sufficient control on descending grades of less than 1 mile.

Support:
12bk To establish a downhill truck speed limit, a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs. or more will be provided.

Standard:
12bl Speed profiles for truck speed limits shall be prepared on the same form as other speed surveys and remain valid for up to 7 years and may be extended to 14 years if conditions are met. An analysis of collisions involving trucks shall be prepared.

Speed Traps
Support:
12bm Refer to CVC § 40802 for Speed Traps.

Standard:
12bn A speed trap shall not apply to a local street, road, school zone, senior zone, or business activity district.

Support:
12bo Senior zone is an area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign pursuant to CVC § 22352.
12bp Business activity district is a section of highway described in CVC § 22358.9(b) in which a standard 25 mph or 20 mph speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to CVC § 22358.9(a)(1).

Standard:
12bq A section of highway shall be defined as a speed trap if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an E&TS within five years, and the enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects, or seven years when using radar and all of the criteria specified in Paragraph 12bn are met. 12br This time provision shall be extended to seven years if the existing speed limit is initially valid for 5 years, when using radar and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of radar operator course. Approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. • The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation. 12bs This time provision shall be extended to seven years if the existing speed limit is initially valid for 5 years, when using laser or other electronic device (other than radar) and all of the following criteria are met:

California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricade, and Gates January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of radar operator course. Approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. • The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 2 hours of additional training. Course approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training . • The laser or other electronic device used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.

Option:
12bt This time provision for an E&TS may be extended to fourteen years when all of the above conditions are met and no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume as determined by a registered engineer.

Standard:
13 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, resolution, regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency based on an engineering study. The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph.
14 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is required by law, shall be located at the points of change from one speed limit to another.

Guidance:
14a Sections 2A.13 and 2A.16 provide guidance provisions on the location and lateral offset for signs.

Option:
14b Where speed zones are longer than 1-mile, intermediate signs may be placed at approximate 1 mile intervals. 14c For three or more lanes in each direction, dual installation on both the left-side and right-side of the roadway may be used.

Standard:
14d Freeways with a speed limit, 65 mph or 70 mph, Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be posted as follows:
• At the beginning of the segment, on the right-hand side of the roadway. • Subsequently throughout the segment, at a maximum of 10-mile interval and immediately after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment, on the right-hand side of the roadway.

Option:
• The 10-mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.

Standard:
14e Freeways segment where with a speed limit 55 mph, Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment on the right-hand side of the roadway. • Subsequently throughout the segment, at maximum 3-mile interval and immediately after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment with no more than 3 interchanges between signs, on the right-hand side of the roadway.
14f Expressways with a speed limit 55 mph or 65 mph, Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be posted as follows:
• At the beginning of the segment, on the right-hand side of the roadway. • Subsequently throughout the segment, at 3- to 5-mile intervals and immediately after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment, on the right-hand side of the roadway. 14g Conventional highways with a speed limit 55 mph or 65 mph, Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be posted as follows:
• At the beginning of the segment, on the right-hand side of the roadway. • Subsequently throughout the segment, at maximum 5- to 10-mile intervals and immediately after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment, on the right-hand side of the roadway.

Option:
14h Pavement markings with appropriate numerals (refer to Section 3B.20) may be used to supplement speed limit signs.

Standard:
15 At the downstream end of the section to which a particular speed limit applies, a Speed Limit sign showing the next speed limit shall be installed.
16 Speed Limit signs indicating the statutory speed limits shall be installed at entrances to the State and, where California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricade, and Gates January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
appropriate, at jurisdictional boundaries in urban areas.

Guidance:
17 Additional Speed Limit signs should be installed beyond interchanges and major intersections and at other locations where it is necessary to remind road users of the speed limit that is applicable.

Standard:
17a The Speed Zone Ahead (R2-4(CA)) sign shall always be followed by a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign installed at the beginning of the zone where the speed limit applies.
17b The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) signs, shall be placed at the end of the final speed zone, before the highway reverts to maximum statutory speed limit.
17c The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign shall only be used to mark the end of a speed zone. 17d The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign shall not be used at a transition into a change in speed limits within a reduced zone. 17e The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) signs, shall be placed at the end of all speed zones and within a reasonable distance of no greater than 1000 ft from the next Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Option:
17f The Speed Zone Ahead (R2-4(CA)) sign (refer to Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used to inform the motorist of a speed zone. 17g The End Truck Speed Limit (R2-14) sign or the R3(CA) sign (refer to Figure 2B-3(CA)) with the TRUCK (M4-4P) plaque may be used to mark the end of truck speed zones on descending grades. 17h The SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT (R4-3) signs may be installed at locations where there is a tendency of the motorists to drive in the left-hand lane(s) below the normal speed of traffic.

Truck and Bus Speed Limit Signs
Standard
17i The TRUCKS, 3 AXLES OR MORE 55 (R6-3B(CA)) sign, the ALL VEHICLES WHEN TOWING 55 (R6-4B(CA)) sign, or the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign and the TRUCK SPEED LIMIT(R2-2P) plaque, shall be placed to indicate the truck speed limit in all truck speed zones.
17j The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign and the BUS SPEED LIMIT (R2-2aP(CA)) plaque shall be placed to indicate bus speed limit in all bus speed zones.

Support:
17k Refer to Section 2B.22 for TRUCK and BUS speed zone signs.

Support:
18 The “Traffic Control Devices Handbook” contains suggested criteria on the spacing of speed limit signs. 18a Refer to FHWA’s List of Known Errors for error in Paragraph 18 text. Refer to Section 1A.04 for more details.

Guidance:
18b The Speed Limit (R2-1) signs and R6-3B(CA) and R6-4B(CA) signs should be placed in a location to be most effectively viewed by the approaching motorists.

Standard:
18c When used, the TRUCKS, 3 AXLES OR MORE 55 (R6-3B(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign, both at the beginning and throughout each 60, 65 or 70 mph segment. 18d The ALL VEHICLES WHEN TOWING 55 (R6-4B(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following the R6- 3B(CA) sign.

Guidance:
18e The R6-3B(CA) and R6-4B(CA) signs should be placed on highway segments where speeds in excess of 55 mph are permitted.

Option:
18f The existing AUTOS WITH TRAILERS, TRUCKS 55 MAXIMUM (R6-1(CA)) sign may remain in place until it is knocked down, damaged, stolen, vandalized, or otherwise reaches the end of its useful life. 18g The local California Highway Patrol office may be consulted to identify highway segments where enforcement is an issue. On these segments early replacement of existing R6-1(CA) signs may be necessary.

Support:
18h Refer to CVC § 22406 for types of vehicles subject to the 55 mph maximum speed limit.

Option:
19 If a jurisdiction has a policy of installing Speed Limit signs in accordance with statutory requirements only on the California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricade, and Gates January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
streets that enter a city, neighborhood, or residential area to indicate the speed limit that is applicable to the entire city, neighborhood, or residential area unless otherwise posted, a CITYWIDE (R2- 5aP), NEIGHBORHOOD (R2-5bP), or RESIDENTIAL (R2-5cP) plaque may be mounted above the Speed Limit sign and an UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED (R2-5P) plaque may be mounted below the Speed Limit sign (see Figure 2B-3).

Support:
20 Section 2C.40 contains information about the use of speed zone signs to inform road users of a reduced or variable speed zone to provide advance notice to comply with the posted speed limit ahead.

Option:
21 If a W3-5b sign is posted to provide notice of a variable speed zone, an END VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT (R2-13) sign (see Figure 2B-3) may be installed at the downstream end of the zone to provide notice to road users of the termination of the speed zone.

Standard:
22 If a W3-5c sign is posted to provide notice of a truck speed zone, an END TRUCK SPEED LIMIT (R2-14) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall be installed at the downstream end of the zone to provide notice to road users of the termination of the speed zone.

Guidance:
23 An advisory speed plaque (see Section 2C.59) mounted below a warning sign should be used to warn road users of an advisory speed for a roadway condition. A Speed Limit sign should not be used for this purpose. 24 Advance traffic control warning signs (see Section 2C.35), intersection warning signs (see Section 2C.41), and/or other traffic control devices are appropriate warning prior to a signalized intersection. A Speed Limit sign should not be used for this purpose.

Option:
25 Two types of Speed Limit signs may be used: one to designate passenger car speeds, including any nighttime information or maximum or minimum speed limit that might apply; and the other to show any special speed limits for trucks and other vehicles.

Guidance:
26 No more than three speed limits should be displayed on any one Speed Limit sign or assembly.

Speed Enforced Signs
Option:
26a The SPEED ENFORCED BY RADAR (R48(CA)) sign (refer to Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used where the California Highway Patrol has received authority to use radar and requests such signs.

Guidance:
26b One sign should be used in each direction at the beginning of the segment of roadway, and at intervening major route intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Support:
26c The R48(CA) sign is a stand-alone sign intended to alert motorists that speed is enforced by radar on a particular segment of roadway.

Option:
26d The RADAR ENFORCED (R48-1P(CA)) sign (refer to Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used in combination with the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign on any roadway where law enforcement has the authority to use radar.

Guidance:
26e When used, the R48-1P(CA) sign should be placed below the R2-1 sign, at the beginning of the segment of roadway and at intervening major intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Option:
26f The SPEED ENFORCED BY AIRCRAFT (R48-2(CA)) sign (refer to Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be placed, when requested by the California Highway Patrol, on sections of highway regularly patrolled by aircraft.

Standard:
26g The R48-2(CA) sign shall be used for both directions of travel.

Guidance:
26h The R48-2(CA) sign should be placed at the beginning of the section and spaced at 25-mile intervals.

California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricade, and Gates January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
Speed Zones in Temporary Traffic Control Areas
Support:
26i For signing and establishing speed zones in temporary traffic control areas, refer to Section 6B.01 in Part 6.

Traffic Signals within Speed Zones
Standard:
26j An agency changing the speed limits within its jurisdiction shall report the speed limit change to the agency operating and maintaining traffic signals within the speed zone no later than 30 days before changing the posted speed limit.

Support:
26k Changing the signal timing and adjusting the advance detector loops based on the revised speed limits can enhance the operations of the traffic signal.

Use of Metric System Designations – Refer to CVC § 21351.3 Option:
26l Dual units for speed limits on signs may be placed on local streets and roads in both Metric and English units.

Guidance:
26m If used, dual unit speed limits should be rounded to the nearest 10 km/h for Metric and 5 mph for English units for posting on signs on local streets and roads.

Support:
26n Refer to AASHTO’s Traffic Engineering Metric Conversion Factors. Refer to Section 1A.05 for information regarding this publication.

Standard:
26o Metric speed limits shall not be placed on State highways.

Option:
27 A variable speed limit sign that changes the speed limit for traffic and ambient conditions may be installed provided that the appropriate speed limit is displayed at the proper times and locations in accordance with Paragraphs 9 and 10 of this Section.

Standard:
28 The variable speed limit sign legend “SPEED LIMIT” shall be a black legend on a white retroreflective background. The variable speed limit legend shall be displayed in white LEDs on an opaque black background.

Support:
29 Section 2C.13 contains information about the use of a Vehicle Speed Feedback plaque mounted below a Speed Limit sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling. 30 Advisory speed signs and plaques are discussed in Sections 2C.12 and 2C.59. Temporary traffic control zone speed signs are discussed in Part 6. The WORK ZONE (G20-5aP) plaque intended for installation above a Speed Limit sign is discussed in Section 6G.08. School Speed Limit signs are discussed in Section 7B.05.

Section 2B.22 Vehicle Speed Limit Plaques (R2-2P Series) Standard:
01 Where a special speed limit applies to certain classes of vehicles, the Truck Speed Limit (R2-2P) plaque, Bus Speed Limit (R2-2aP) plaque, Truck-Bus Speed Limit (R2-2bP) plaque, or Vehicles over X Tons Speed Limit (R2-2cP) plaque (see Figure 2B-3) shall be displayed below the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign, except as provided in Paragraph 2 of this Section.

Option:
01a Where a special speed limit applies to certain classes of vehicles, the TRUCKS, 3 AXLES OR MORE 55 (R6-3B(CA)) sign followed by the ALL VEHICLES WHEN TOWING 55 (R6-4B(CA)) sign may be used. Refer to Section 2B.21 and CVC § 22406. 02 The legend of a Vehicle Speed Limit (R2-2P series) plaque may be combined in a single sign and displayed below the SPEED LIMIT XX legend, similar to the Combined Maximum and Minimum Speed Limits (R2-4a) sign (see Section 2B.24).

A different vehicle class legend may be substituted on the R2-2P series plaque for other classes of vehicles not included in Paragraph 1 of this Section.

Section 2B.23 Night Speed Limit Plaque (R2-3P)
California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricade, and Gates January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
Standard:
01 Where different speed limits are prescribed for day and night, both limits shall be posted.

Guidance:
02 A Night Speed Limit (R2-3P) plaque (see Figure 2B-3) should be reversed using a white retroreflective legend and border on a black background.

Option:
03 A Night Speed Limit plaque may be combined with or installed below the standard Speed Limit (R2- 1) sign.

Support:
04 Refer to CVC § 22355.

Section 2B.24 Minimum Speed Limit Plaque (R2-4P) and Combined Maximum and Minimum Speed Limits Sign (R2-4a)
Standard:
01 A Minimum Speed Limit (R2-4P) plaque (see Figure 2B-3) shall be displayed only in combination with a Speed Limit sign. Where used, the R2-4P plaque shall be mounted below a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Option:
02 Where engineering judgment determines that slow speeds on a highway might impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, the Minimum Speed Limit (R2-4P) plaque may be installed below a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign to indicate the minimum legal speed. In lieu of a sign assembly with the R2-1 sign and R2- 4P plaque, the Combined Maximum and Minimum Speed Limits (R2-4a) sign may be used.

Support:
03 Refer to CVC § 22400.

Section 2B.25 Higher Fines Signs and Plaque (R2-6P, R2-10, and R2-11) Standard:
01 Except as provided in Paragraph 3 of this Section, if increased fines are imposed for traffic violations within a designated zone of a roadway, a BEGIN HIGHER DOUBLE FINES ZONE (R2-10) sign (see Figure 2B-3) or a FINES HIGHER DOUBLE (R2-6aP) plaque (see Figure 2B-3) shall be used to provide notice to road users. 02 If an R2-10 sign or an R2-6P plaque is posted to provide notice of increased fines for traffic violations, an END HIGHER DOUBLE FINES ZONE (R2-11) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall be installed at the downstream end of the zone to provide notice to road users of the termination of the increased fines zone.

Option:
03 The BEGIN HIGHER DOUBLE FINES ZONE (R2-10) sign or FINES HIGHER DOUBLE (R2-6aP) plaque may be omitted where the higher double fines zone is established by statute.

Guidance:
04 The BEGIN HIGHER DOUBLE FINES ZONE sign or FINES HIGHER DOUBLE plaque should be located at the beginning of the temporary traffic control zone, school zone, or other applicable designated zone and just beyond any interchanges, major intersections, or other major traffic generators. 05 Agencies should limit the use of the Higher Double Fines signs and plaque to locations where work is actually underway, or to locations where the roadway, shoulder, or other conditions, including the presence of a school zone and/or a reduced school speed limit zone, require a speed reduction or extra caution on the part of the road user.

Standard:
06 The Higher Double Fines signs and plaque shall have a black legend and border on a white rectangular background. All supplemental plaques mounted below the Higher Double Fines signs and plaque shall have a black legend and border on a white rectangular background. 07 The FINES HIGHER DOUBLE plaque shall be mounted below an applicable regulatory or warning sign in a temporary traffic control zone (see Section 6G.08), a school zone (see Section 7B.06), or other applicable designated zone.

Option:
08 Alternate legends such as BEGIN (or END) DOUBLE FINES ZONE may also be used for the R2-10 and R2-11 signs.
09 The legend FINES HIGHER on the R2-6P plaque may be replaced by FINES DOUBLE (R2-6aP), $XX FINE (R2- California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricade, and Gates January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
6bP), or another legend appropriate to the specific regulation (see Figure 2B-3). 10 The following may be mounted below an R2-10 sign or R2-6P plaque:

A. A supplemental plaque specifying the times that the higher fines are in effect (similar to the S4-1P plaque shown in Figure 7B-1),
B. A supplemental plaque WHEN CHILDREN (WORKERS) ARE PRESENT, or C. A supplemental plaque WHEN FLASHING (similar to the S4-4P plaque shown in Figure 7B-1) if used in conjunction with a Speed Limit Sign Beacon (see Section 4S.04).

Support:
11 In California, as per CVC only doubling of the fines is allowed, not higher fines of other denominations. Refer to CVC § 42010 for Safety Enhancement-Double Fine Zone and Section 6G.08 and CVC § 42009 for fines for offenses committed in highway construction or maintenance area.

Standard:
12 The SPECIAL DRIVING ZONE BEGINS HERE – DOUBLE FINE ZONE (SR53(CA)) sign (refer to Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be placed at the beginning of those portions of highways designated and identified as Safety Enhancement – Double Fine Zones per CVC § 42010.
13 The SPECIAL DRIVING ZONE ENDS HERE (SR55(CA)) sign (refer to Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be placed at the end of those portions of highways designated and identified as Safety Enhancement – Double Fine Zones per CVC § 42010.

Guidance:
14 The DOUBLE FINE ZONE (SR54(CA)) sign (refer to Figure 2B-3(CA)) should be placed at major intersections to those portions of highways designated and identified as Safety Enhancement – Double Fine Zone, per CVC § 42010, to advise motorists upon entering the highway that they are in a double fine zone.

California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates (Tables) January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
Table 2B-101(CA). Standard Application of Speed Limits per California Vehicle Code Speed Determined by Roadway Facility CVC Section
15 mph State or local
authority
▪ Railroad grade crossing with obstructed view
▪ Uncontrolled highway intersection with obstructed view ▪ An alley
22352.a.1
15 & 20 mph State or local
authority
Where the prima facie speed of 25 mph is more than is reasonable or safe ▪ Narrow street not exceeding 25 feet other than a State Highway in a business or residential area or in a public park
▪ Road near a school or senior center facility
22358.3 &
22358.4
25 mph State or local
authority
▪ Any highway in any business or residential district
▪ A street contiguous to a senior citizen facility other than a State highway ▪ Adjacent to a children’s playground in a public park, but only during particular hours or days when children are expected to use the facilities
22352.b &
22357.1
California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates (Tables) January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
Table 2B-102(CA). Standard Application of Speed Limits per California Vehicle Code Speed Determined by Roadway Facility CVC
Section
15 to 60 mph Caltrans State highway, based on an E&TS where the limit of 65 mph is more than reasonable or safe 22354
15 to 60 mph
Local city council or
county board of
supervisors for
Caltrans
State highway, local entities may conduct a public hearing on proposed increases or decreases, and the State Department of Transportation shall take into consideration the results of the public hearing
22354.5
30 to 65 mph Local authority
Any street other than a state highway, by ordinance, may post a prima facie speed limit based on an E&TS where a speed > 25 mph would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe 22357
15 to 60 mph Local authority
Any street other than a state highway, by ordinance, may post a prima facie speed limit based on an E&TS where the limit of 65 mph is more than is reasonable and safe
22358
20 to 50 mph for
Trucks
State or local
authority
Highways under their respective jurisdiction where 55 mph is more than is reasonable or safe for vehicles mentioned in CVC 22406 (Trucks and other large vehicles)
22407
MaximumSpeed 55
mph
State or local
authority
▪ Two-lane, undivided highway
▪ Any highway when driving any of the following vehicles:
a. Motortruck or truck tractor with > 3 axles
b. Passenger vehicle or bus towing any other vehicle
c. School bus transporting any school pupil
d. A farm labor vehicle when transporting passengers
e. A vehicle transporting explosives
f. A trailer bus
22349.b & .c
and 22406
MaximumSpeed
Limit of 65 mph
State or local
authority
Any highway, posted at 65 mph based upon an E&TS, for vehicles not subject to CVC 22406
22349(a) &
22349
Maximum Freeway
Speed Limit of 70
mph
Caltrans
Freeways, after consultation with the California Highway Patrol, based upon an E&TS, or upon the basis of appropriate design standards and projected traffic volumes in the case of newly constructed freeway segments, for vehicles not subject to CVC 22406
22356
California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates (Tables) January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
Table 2B-103(CA). Examples Showing the Applicability of Rounding and Additional Speed Reduction
85th-Percentile
Speed (mph)
Rounding to the
nearest 5 mph
increment (CVC
22358.6(a))
If rounding to the
nearest is up, may
round down (CVC
22358.6(c))
If rounding to the
nearest is down, it
may additionally be
lowered by 5 mph
(CVC 22358.6(b))
If safety corridor or
adjacent to high
concentration of bicyclists
& pedestrians, may
additionally lower by 5
mph (CVC 22358.7)

47.5-50.0 50 45 N/A 40

45.1-47.4 45 N/A 40 35

42.5-45.0 45 40 N/A 35

40.1-42.4 40 N/A 35 30
California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates (Tables) January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
Table 2B-104(CA). Safety Corridor Factors
Category Factors
Crash Weighting Factors to
Develop One Serious/Fatal Injury
Safety Corridor
▪ Crash severity: Fatal Crashes, Serious Injury Crashes ▪ Mode: Pedestrian-bicycle related crashes, vehicle/other ▪ Disadvantaged Community Status: MPO/RTPA or locally defined disadvantaged community status based on most current version of CalEnviroScreen ▪ Vulnerable Populations: Seniors (age 65 and older) and Youth (under age 15) based on the American Community Survey
▪ School proximity (within 0.25 miles) based on the California School Campus Database ▪ Systemic or Predicted Crashes
Crash Density
Each roadway segment block may be converted into ~ 0.25-mile overlapping or contiguous “corridor” segments to create a consistent unit of measurement and assess the concentration of linear patterns of crashes within a defined distance. The highest scoring (i.e., most fatal and serious injury crashes per mile) “corridor” segments within a street need to be identified and an appropriate threshold set to determine safety corridor eligibility.

Maintenance The jurisdiction may establish a review and re-evaluation frequency for safety corridors.

However, such frequency need not exceed seven years.

California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates (Tables) January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
Table 2B-105(CA). Generators of High Concentrations of Bicyclists or Pedestrians Category Generator
Land Use
Employment centers
Presence of retail
Parks, multi-use trails, and recreational destinations
Schools/universities
Senior Centers
Cultural areas, entertainment space areas, or areas of community significance Religious facilities
Health/medical facilities
Transit Factors
Transit stops
Transit-Oriented Developments/Transit Priority Areas
Presence of Pedestrian/Bicyclist
Infrastructure
Sidewalk presence
Crosswalk presence
Bikeway presence
Nearby signalized intersections on four-way intersections Presence of micromobility devices such as bicycles or scooters Demographic Factors
Presence of vulnerable groups, including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused
MPO/RTPA or locally defined disadvantaged community status Presence of students (all levels)
Local Data Need identified in a safety analysis, such as a road safety audit or a formalized planning document, such as a local road safety plan
California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates (Tables) January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
Table 2B-101(CA). Standard Application of Speed Limits per California Vehicle Code Speed Determined by Roadway Facility CVC Section
15 mph State or local
authority
▪ Railroad grade crossing with obstructed view
▪ Uncontrolled highway intersection with obstructed view ▪ An alley
22352.a.1
15 & 20 mph State or local
authority
Where the prima facie speed of 25 mph is more than is reasonable or safe ▪ Narrow street not exceeding 25 feet other than a State Highway in a business or residential area or in a public park
▪ Road near a school or senior center facility
22358.3 &
22358.4
25 mph State or local
authority
▪ Any highway in any business or residential district
▪ A street contiguous to a senior citizen facility other than a State highway ▪ Adjacent to a children’s playground in a public park, but only during particular hours or days when children are expected to use the facilities
22352.b &
22357.1
California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates (Tables) January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
Table 2B-102(CA). Standard Application of Speed Limits per California Vehicle Code Speed Determined by Roadway Facility CVC
Section
15 to 60 mph Caltrans State highway, based on an E&TS where the limit of 65 mph is more than reasonable or safe 22354
15 to 60 mph
Local city council or
county board of
supervisors for
Caltrans
State highway, local entities may conduct a public hearing on proposed increases or decreases, and the State Department of Transportation shall take into consideration the results of the public hearing
22354.5
30 to 65 mph Local authority
Any street other than a state highway, by ordinance, may post a prima facie speed limit based on an E&TS where a speed > 25 mph would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe 22357
15 to 60 mph Local authority
Any street other than a state highway, by ordinance, may post a prima facie speed limit based on an E&TS where the limit of 65 mph is more than is reasonable and safe
22358
20 to 50 mph for
Trucks
State or local
authority
Highways under their respective jurisdiction where 55 mph is more than is reasonable or safe for vehicles mentioned in CVC 22406 (Trucks and other large vehicles)
22407
MaximumSpeed 55
mph
State or local
authority
▪ Two-lane, undivided highway
▪ Any highway when driving any of the following vehicles:
a. Motortruck or truck tractor with > 3 axles
b. Passenger vehicle or bus towing any other vehicle
c. School bus transporting any school pupil
d. A farm labor vehicle when transporting passengers
e. A vehicle transporting explosives
f. A trailer bus
22349.b & .c
and 22406
MaximumSpeed
Limit of 65 mph
State or local
authority
Any highway, posted at 65 mph based upon an E&TS, for vehicles not subject to CVC 22406
22349(a) &
22349
Maximum Freeway
Speed Limit of 70
mph
Caltrans
Freeways, after consultation with the California Highway Patrol, based upon an E&TS, or upon the basis of appropriate design standards and projected traffic volumes in the case of newly constructed freeway segments, for vehicles not subject to CVC 22406
22356
California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates (Tables) January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
Table 2B-103(CA). Examples Showing the Applicability of Rounding and Additional Speed Reduction
85th-Percentile
Speed (mph)
Rounding to the
nearest 5 mph
increment (CVC
22358.6(a))
If rounding to the
nearest is up, may
round down (CVC
22358.6(c))
If rounding to the
nearest is down, it
may additionally be
lowered by 5 mph
(CVC 22358.6(b))
If safety corridor or
adjacent to high
concentration of bicyclists
& pedestrians, may
additionally lower by 5
mph (CVC 22358.7)

47.5-50.0 50 45 N/A 40

45.1-47.4 45 N/A 40 35

42.5-45.0 45 40 N/A 35

40.1-42.4 40 N/A 35 30
California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates (Tables) January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
Table 2B-104(CA). Safety Corridor Factors
Category Factors
Crash Weighting Factors to
Develop One Serious/Fatal Injury
Safety Corridor
▪ Crash severity: Fatal Crashes, Serious Injury Crashes ▪ Mode: Pedestrian-bicycle related crashes, vehicle/other ▪ Disadvantaged Community Status: MPO/RTPA or locally defined disadvantaged community status based on most current version of CalEnviroScreen ▪ Vulnerable Populations: Seniors (age 65 and older) and Youth (under age 15) based on the American Community Survey
▪ School proximity (within 0.25 miles) based on the California School Campus Database ▪ Systemic or Predicted Crashes
Crash Density
Each roadway segment block may be converted into ~ 0.25-mile overlapping or contiguous “corridor” segments to create a consistent unit of measurement and assess the concentration of linear patterns of crashes within a defined distance. The highest scoring (i.e., most fatal and serious injury crashes per mile) “corridor” segments within a street need to be identified and an appropriate threshold set to determine safety corridor eligibility.

Maintenance The jurisdiction may establish a review and re-evaluation frequency for safety corridors.

However, such frequency need not exceed seven years.

California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates (Tables) January 18, 2026 Part 2 Signs
Table 2B-105(CA). Generators of High Concentrations of Bicyclists or Pedestrians Category Generator
Land Use
Employment centers
Presence of retail
Parks, multi-use trails, and recreational destinations
Schools/universities
Senior Centers
Cultural areas, entertainment space areas, or areas of community significance Religious facilities
Health/medical facilities
Transit Factors
Transit stops
Transit-Oriented Developments/Transit Priority Areas
Presence of Pedestrian/Bicyclist
Infrastructure
Sidewalk presence
Crosswalk presence
Bikeway presence
Nearby signalized intersections on four-way intersections Presence of micromobility devices such as bicycles or scooters Demographic Factors
Presence of vulnerable groups, including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused
MPO/RTPA or locally defined disadvantaged community status Presence of students (all levels)
Local Data Need identified in a safety analysis, such as a road safety audit or a formalized planning document, such as a local road safety plan
California MUTCD 2026 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2023 Edition, as amended for use in California)

APPENDIX C
Traffic Radar Certifications
Traffic Radar Equipment Certification
Traffic Radar Operator Certification

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT –
Aileen Garcia has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

1. Aileen Garcia completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

2. Aileen Garcia, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of Radar devices, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

3. Aileen Garcia demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

4. Aileen Garcia is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this 1st day of December 1st, 2023.

Avi Tashman
Certified Instructor

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT –
Bryan Mina has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

1. Bryan Mina completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

2. Bryan Mina, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and setup of Radar devices, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

3. Bryan Mina demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

4. Bryan Mina is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this day of July 10th, 2023.

Avi Tashman
Certified Instructor

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT –
Bryan Quevedo has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

1. Bryan Quevedo completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

2. Bryan Quevedo, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of Radar devices, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

3. Bryan Quevedo demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

4. Bryan Quevedo is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this day of July 10th, 2023.

Avi Tashman
Certified Instructor

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT –
Edwin Villagran has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

1. Edwin Villagran completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

2. Edwin Villagran, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of Radar devices, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

3. Edwin Villagran demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

4. Edwin Villagran is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this 1st day of December 1st, 2023.

Avi Tashman
Certified Instructor

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT –
Gilberto Hernandez has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

1. Gilberto Hernandez completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

2. Gilberto Hernandez, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of Radar devices, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

3. Gilberto Hernandez demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

4. Gilberto Hernandez is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this 1st day of December, 2023.

Avi Tashman
Certified Instructor

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT –
Irving Lorenzano has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

1. Irving Lorenzano completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

2. Irving Lorenzano, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of Radar devices, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

3. Irving Lorenzano demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

4. Irving Lorenzano is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this day of July 10th, 2023.

Avi Tashman
Certified Instructor

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT –
Isidro Lopez has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

1. Isidro Lopez completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

2. Isidro Lopez, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of Radar devices, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

3. Isidro Lopez demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

4. Isidro Lopez is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this day of July 10th, 2023.

Avi Tashman
Certified Instructor

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT –
Jackson Stump has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

1. Jackson Stump completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

2. Jackson Stump, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of Radar devices, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

3. Jackson Stump demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

4. Jackson Stump is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this 1st day of July, 2024.

Avi Tashman
Certified Instructor

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT –
James Oreste has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

1. James Oreste completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

2. James Oreste, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of Radar devices, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

3. James Oreste demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

4. James Oreste is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this 1st day of December, 2023.

Avi Tashman
Certified Instructor

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT –
Jordan Flores has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

1. Jordan Flores completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

2. Jordan Flores, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of Radar devices, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

3. Jordan Flores demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

4. Jordan Flores is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this 1 st day of December, 2023.

Avi Tashman
Certified Instructor

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT –
Katherine de la Roca has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

1. Katherine de la Roca completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

2. Katherine de la Roca, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of Radar devices, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

3. Katherine de la Roca demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

4. Katherine de la Roca is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this day of July 10th, 2023.

Avi Tashman
Certified Instructor

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT –
Manuel Rojo has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

1. Manuel Rojo completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

2. Manuel Rojo, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of Radar devices, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

3. Manuel Rojo demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

4. Manuel Rojo is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this day of July 10th, 2023.

Avi Tashman
Certified Instructor

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT –
Rafael Godoy has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

1. Rafael Godoy completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

2. Rafael Godoy, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of Radar devices, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

3. Rafael Godoy demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

4. Rafael Godoy is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this day of July 10th, 2023.

Avi Tashman
Certified Instructor

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT –
Rebecca Juarez has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

1. Rebecca Juarez completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

2. Rebecca Juarez, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of Radar devices, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

3. Rebecca Juarez demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

4. Rebecca Juarez is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this 1st day of December, 2023.

Avi Tashman
Certified Instructor

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT –
Stephen Bruning has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

1. Stephen Bruning completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

2. Stephen Bruning, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of Radar devices, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

3. Stephen Bruning demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

4. Stephen Bruning is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this 1st day of December, 2023.

Avi Tashman
Certified Instructor

APPENDIX D
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Reports
Flower Street to Main Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/20/2026 TIME START 9:00 TIME STOP: 11:00
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1803 W. Almond Ave.
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:1 lane each direction, no centerline, all-way STOP at Feldner Rd 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT Residential district, multiple driveways, narrow roadway 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,462 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.57
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 6 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 3.92 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 32 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 27 mph
41 0
40 0 15TH %: 21 mph
39 0
38 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 27 mph
37 X X 2
36 X X 2 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 mph
35 X X 2
34 X X X X 4 % IN PACE: 66%
33 X X X 3
32 X X X 3 % OVER PACE: 22%
31 X X X X X X 6
30 X X X X X X X 7 % UNDER PACE: 12%
29 X X X X X 5
28 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
27 X X X X X X X X 8 P
26 X X X X X X 6 A EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 25 25 X X X X X X X 7 C
24 X X X X 4 E
23 X X X X X X 6
22 X X X X X 5 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X X X X X X X X 8
20 X X X X 4
19 X X X 3 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 X X X 3
17 X X 2 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
101
DATE
Pace
Almond Avenue Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
on-street parking, multiple driveways,
high accident rate, segment being in a
residential district, and CVC 22358.6(b),
it is recommended to post the speed limit
on this segment at 25 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 1 AlmFloMai.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
The City Drive/State College Boulevard to Orangewood Avenue (NCL) 75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/13/2026 TIME START 9:12 TIME STOP: 10:53
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 440 S Anaheim Way
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Commercial, no on street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:One way street going northbound, three lanes, signalized intersection at Orangewood and State Colle 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT Hospital area, high pedestrian activity 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 X X X X X 5 DAILY TRAFFIC: 6,065 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.34 53 X X X 3
52 X X X X 4
51 X X X X 4
50 X X X X X X 6 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 1 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.27 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.61 acc/mvm 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 P
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 A
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C 85TH %: 50 mph
43 X X X X X X X X 8 E Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 50TH %: 46 mph
41 X X X X X X X X 8
40 X X X X X X X X 8 15TH %: 42 mph
39 0
38 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 46 mph
37 0
36 0 10 MPH PACE: 40 - 49 mph
35 0
34 0 % IN PACE: 84%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 16%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 0%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 45
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
138
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
high pedestrian activity, hospital area,
horizontal curvature, and CVC 22358.6(b),
its recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 45 mph.

Pace
Anaheim Way Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 2 AnaTheOra.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
La Veta Avenue to Chapman Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/20/2026 TIME START 11:09 TIME STOP: 12:16
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 215 S Batavia St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:1 lane each direction, single yellow centerline, all-way STOP at Almond Ave, school zone 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT Multiple driveways, residential area, pedestrian crossing, high accident rate 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 9,275 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.51
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 34 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 3.98 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 32 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 28 mph
41 0
40 0 15TH %: 23 mph
39 X 1
38 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 27 mph
37 X 1
36 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 mph
35 X X 2
34 X X 2 % IN PACE: 74%
33 X X X X X 5
32 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 17%
31 X X X X X X X X 8
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 % UNDER PACE: 9%
29 X X X X X X X X 8
28 X X X X X X X X 8 P
27 X X X X X X X 7 A
26 X X X X X X X X X 9 C EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 25 25 X X X X X X X 7 E
24 X X X X X 5
23 X X X X X X X X 8
22 X X X X X 5 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X X X 3
20 X X X X 4
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 X 1
17 X 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
100
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
multiple driveways, pedestrian crossing,
residential area, on-street parking, high
accident rate, and CVC 22358.6(b), it is
recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 25 mph.

Pace
Batavia Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 3 BatLavCha.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Chapman Avenue to AT&SF RR
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/20/2026 TIME START 12:23 TIME STOP: 1:37
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 244 N Batavia St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Palm Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT Railroad crossing, high accident rate 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 12,508 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.69
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 20 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.27 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 47 0
46 X 1
45 X 1
44 X 1 85TH %: 37 mph
43 X 1 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X 1 50TH %: 32 mph
41 X X 2
40 0 15TH %: 27 mph
39 X X 2
38 X X X 3 AVERAGE SPEED: 32 mph
37 X X X X X X 6
36 X X X X 4 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 mph
35 X X X X X X X X 8
34 X X X X X X 6 P % IN PACE: 68%
33 X X X X X X X X 8 A
32 X X X X X X X X 8 C % OVER PACE: 12%
31 X X X X X X X 7 E
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 % UNDER PACE: 21%
29 X X X X X X 6
28 X X X X X X X 7
27 X X X X X X 6
26 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 30 25 X X X X X 5
24 X X X X 4
23 X 1
22 X 1 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X 1
20 X 1
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
102
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
on-street parking, residential area, railroad
crossing, high accident rate, and
CVC 22358.6(b), it is recommended to
post the speed limit on this segment
at 30 mph.

Pace
Batavia Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 4 BatChaAt&.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
AT&SF RR to Collins Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/15/2026 TIME START 9:50 TIME STOP: 10:30
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 792 N Batavia St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Commercial, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Collins Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT No left turn storage lanes, railroad crossing, multiple driveways 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 12,029 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.31
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 6 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.87 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 47 0
46 X X 2
45 X X X X 4
44 X X X X 4 85TH %: 42 mph
43 X X X X 4 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X 6 50TH %: 37 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X 10
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 15TH %: 31 mph
39 X X X X X X X 7 P
38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A AVERAGE SPEED: 37 mph
37 X X X X X X X X 8 C
36 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X 9
34 X X X X X X X X 8 % IN PACE: 67%
33 X X X X X X 6
32 X X X X X X 6 % OVER PACE: 11%
31 X X X X X 5
30 X X X X X X 6 % UNDER PACE: 22%
29 X X X 3
28 X X X 3
27 X X 2
26 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35 25 0
24 X 1
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
124
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
on-street parking, residential area, railroad
crossing, high accident rate, and
CVC 22358.6(b), it is recommended to post
the speed limit on this segment at 35 mph.

Pace
Batavia Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 5 BatAt&Col.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Collins Avenue to Katella Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/15/2026 TIME START 9:00 TIME STOP: 9:45
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1109 N Batavia St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Commercial, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, two-way left turn double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Struck Av 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 12,737 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.46
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 7 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 33 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 28 mph
41 X 1
40 0 15TH %: 23 mph
39 0
38 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 28 mph
37 X X 2
36 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 mph
35 X X X X X X 6
34 X X X 3 % IN PACE: 73%
33 X X X X 4
32 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 15%
31 X X X X X X X 7
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 % UNDER PACE: 12%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 A
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
26 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35 25 X X X X X X X X X X 10
24 X X X X X X X X X X 10
23 X X X X X 5
22 X X X X 4 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X X X X 4
20 X X X X X X 6
19 X 1 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 X 1
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
133
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment
at 35mph.

Pace
Batavia Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 6 BatColKat.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Katella Avenue to Taft Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/20/2026 TIME START 9:54 TIME STOP: 10:30
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1640 N Batavia St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Commercial, no on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, two-way left turn double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Taft Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT Railroad crossing, multiple driveways 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 13,992 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.46
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 4 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.34 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 0
46 X 1
45 0
44 X X X 3 85TH %: 39 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X 2 50TH %: 35 mph
41 X X X X X 5
40 X X X X 4 15TH %: 31 mph
39 X X X 3
38 X X X X X X 6 AVERAGE SPEED: 35 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
36 X X X X X X X X X 9 A 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C
34 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % IN PACE: 75%
33 X X X X X X X X X 9
32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 % OVER PACE: 11%
31 X X X X X X X 7
30 X X 2 % UNDER PACE: 14%
29 X X X X 4
28 X X X 3
27 X 1
26 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35 25 X X 2
24 X 1
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
108
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
railroad crossing, multiple driveways,
and CVC 22358.6(c), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
35 mph.

Pace
Batavia Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 7 BatKatTaf.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Taft Avenue to Lincoln Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/20/2026 TIME START 9:00 TIME STOP: 10:15
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 8900 N Battavia St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, no on-street parking, bike lanes 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, two-way left turn double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Lincoln Av 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 15,402 SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.33
53 0
52 X 1
51 X X X 3
50 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 25 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X 1
48 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.67 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 X X X 3
46 X X X 3
45 X X X X 4
44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 85TH %: 44 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X 9 50TH %: 38 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 15TH %: 32 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14
38 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph
37 X X X X X X 6 A
36 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 mph
35 X X X X X X X 7 E
34 X X X X X X X X X 9 % IN PACE: 60%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14
32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 % OVER PACE: 27%
31 X X X X X 5
30 X X X X X X 6 % UNDER PACE: 13%
29 X X X 3
28 X X X 3
27 X X X X 4
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 X 1
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
175
DATE
Pace
Batavia Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC22358.6(c), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
40 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 8 BatTafLin.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Prospect Street to Hewes Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/22/2026 TIME START 11:25 TIME STOP: 1:10
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 3706 E Bond Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, no on-street parking, bike trail on north side of Bond Ave 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:1 lane each direction, double yellow striped median, signalized intersection at Prospect St 60 X 1
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT Bike trail, residential area
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 X 1 DAILY TRAFFIC: 8,435 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.53
53 X X 2
52 X 1
51 X 1
50 X X X X X 5 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 7 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X X X 4
48 X X X X X X 6 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.85 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
44 X X X X X X X X 8 A 85TH %: 48 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 E 50TH %: 44 mph 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 15TH %: 40 mph
39 X X X X X X X X 8
38 X X 2 AVERAGE SPEED: 44 mph
37 X 1
36 0 10 MPH PACE: 39 - 48 mph
35 0
34 0 % IN PACE: 86%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 12%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 2%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
128
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on CVC 22358.8, and the segment
characteristics not changing since the last
speed survey, it is recommended to post
the speed limit on this segment at 40 mph.

Pace
Bond Avenue Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 9 BonProHew.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Hewes Street to Rancho Santiago Boulevard
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/13/2026 TIME START 9:45 TIME STOP: 11:05
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 18792 E Bond Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Hewes St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT Residenital district, multiple driveways, high accident rate 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,377 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.25
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 4 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 3.67 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 X X 2 85TH %: 39 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X 2 50TH %: 33 mph
41 X X X X 4
40 X X X X X X 6 15TH %: 28 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X 9
38 X X X X X X X 7 AVERAGE SPEED: 33 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 30 mph.
36 X X X X X X X 7 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X 9
34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P % IN PACE: 71%
33 X X X X X X X X 8 A
32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C % OVER PACE: 22%
31 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 % UNDER PACE: 7%
29 X X X 3
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14
27 X X X 3
26 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 30 25 X 1
24 X X 2
23 0
22 X 1 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X 1
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
136
DATE
Pace
Bond Avenue Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
on-street parking, residential district,
multiple driveways, high accident rate,
and CVC 22358.7(a)(2), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 10 BonHewRan.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
South City Limits to Palmyra Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/20/2026 TIME START 2:25 TIME STOP: 4:00
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS:
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:1 lane each direction, single yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Palmyra Ave, bike lanes 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 8,658 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.54
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 11 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.30 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 35 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 32 mph
41 0
40 X 1 15TH %: 29 mph
39 X 1
38 X X X X X 5 AVERAGE SPEED: 32 mph
37 X X X 3
36 X X X X X X X X 8 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 % IN PACE: 91%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 P
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 A % OVER PACE: 7% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 C
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 E % UNDER PACE: 2% 29 X X X X X X X X X 9
28 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
27 X X X X 4
26 X X X 3 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35 25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
138
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
35 mph.

Pace
Cambridge Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 11 CamSouPal.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Palmyra Avenue to Katella Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/20/2026 TIME START 12:40 TIME STOP: 2:15
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 339 N Cambridge St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:1 lane each direction, single yellow striped centerline, all-way stop-control at Sycamore Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 5,617 SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.72
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 32 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.82 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 28 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 25 mph
41 0
40 0 15TH %: 23 mph
39 0
38 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 25 mph
37 0
36 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 mph
35 0
34 X 1 % IN PACE: 95%
33 0
32 X 1 % OVER PACE: 5%
31 X X X 3
30 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 0%
29 X X X 3
28 X X X X X X X X X 9
27 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 A EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 25 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 C
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 E
23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16
22 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X X X X X 5
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
114
DATE
Pace
Cambridge Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
high accident rate, and CVC 22358.6(c),
it is recommended to post the speed limit
on this segment at 25 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 12 CamPalKat.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Katella Avenue to Taft Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/20/2026 TIME START 2:32 TIME STOP: 1:52
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1638 N Cambridge St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, bike lanes, signalized intersection at Taft Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT Horizontal curvature, no left turn storage lane 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 8,224 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.47
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 5 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X 2
48 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.70 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 47 X X X 3
46 X X 2
45 X X 2
44 0 85TH %: 41 mph
43 X X 2 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X 1 50TH %: 37 mph
41 X X X X X X X 7
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 15TH %: 34 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X 9
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 A 30 mph.
36 X X X X X X X 7 C 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 mph
35 X X X X X X X X 8 E
34 X X X X X X X 7 % IN PACE: 77%
33 X X X 3
32 X X 2 % OVER PACE: 13%
31 X X X X 4
30 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 10%
29 X X X 3
28 0
27 X 1
26 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 30 25 X 1
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
107
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
bike lane, horizontal curvature, residential
area, no left turn storage lanes, and
CVC 22358.7(a)(2), it is recommended to
post the speed limit on this segment at
Pace
Cambridge Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 13 CamKatTaf.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Taft Avenue to Meats Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/21/2026 TIME START 11:26 TIME STOP: 12:43
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1829 N Cambridge St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, bike lanes, ped crosswalk at Glendale Ave, 60 0 school zone
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT Horizontal curvature, school area, pedestrian crosswalk, no left turn storage 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 6,207 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.53
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 4 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.67 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 33 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 28 mph
41 0
40 0 15TH %: 25 mph
39 0
38 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 29 mph
37 X X 2
36 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 mph
35 X X X 3
34 X X X X X 5 % IN PACE: 81%
33 X X X X X X X X 8
32 X X X X X X X X 8 % OVER PACE: 12%
31 X X X X X X X X X X 10
30 X X X X 4 P % UNDER PACE: 7%
29 X X X X X X X X 8 A
28 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
27 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
26 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 30 25 X X X X X X X X 8
24 X X X X X X X 7
23 X X 2
22 X X X 3 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X 1
20 X 1
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
105
DATE
Pace
Cambridge Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
bike lane, school area, horizontal curvature,
pedestrian crossing, and CVC 22358.6(c), it
is recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 30 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 14 CamTafMea.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Meats Avenue to Heim Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/14/2026 TIME START 11:59 TIME STOP: 12:51
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2342 N Canal St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Heim Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT Horizontal curvature, park area, no left turn storage lanes 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 5,514 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.53
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 7 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.32 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 37 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 33 mph
41 X X 2
40 X X X X 4 15TH %: 30 mph
39 X X X X X 5
38 X X 2 AVERAGE SPEED: 33 mph
37 X X X 3
36 X X X X X 5 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10
34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P % IN PACE: 88%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
32 X X X X X X X X 8 C % OVER PACE: 13%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 % UNDER PACE: 0% 29 X X X X X X X X 8
28 X X X X 4
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 30
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
104
DATE
Pace
Canal Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
horizontal curvature, on-street parking,
park area, no left turn storage lanes, and
CVC 22358.6(b), it is recommended to post
the speed limit on this segment at 30 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 15 CanMeaHei.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Chapman Avenue to Creekside Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/16/2026 TIME START 10:15 TIME STOP: 11:00
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 294 N Cannon St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow striped median, all-way stop-control at Creekside Ave, 60 0 bike lane
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 8,469 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.40
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 4 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.65 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 37 mph
43 X X 2 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 32 mph
41 X X 2
40 X X X X 4 15TH %: 29 mph
39 X X X 3
38 X X X 3 AVERAGE SPEED: 32 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X 10
36 X X X X X 5 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 mph
35 X X X X X X X 7
34 X X X X X X X X X 9 P % IN PACE: 82%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 A
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C % OVER PACE: 10%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 % UNDER PACE: 8% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14
28 X X X X X X X X X X 10
27 X X X X X X X X X X 10
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35
25 X 1
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
142
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
bike lane, and CVC 22358.6(a), it is
recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 35 mph.

Pace
Cannon Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 16 CanChaCre.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Creekside Avenue to Cliffway Drive
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/16/2026 TIME START 11:10 TIME STOP: 12:00
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 400 N Cannon St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, no on-street parking, protected bike lane west of Cannon 63 X 1
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow striped median, all-way stop-control at Cliffway Dr 60 0
59 0
58 X 1 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 X X 2 AVERAGE
54 X 1 DAILY TRAFFIC: 6,203 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.36
53 0
52 0
51 X 1
50 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 2 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 X X 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.49 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 X X 2
46 X X X X 4
45 X X X X X X 6
44 X X X X X X 6 85TH %: 44 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X 9 50TH %: 39 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P 15TH %: 33 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 A
38 X X X X X X X 7 C AVERAGE SPEED: 39 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 mph 35 X X X X X 5
34 X X X X X X X X 8 % IN PACE: 66%
33 X X X X X X X X X 9
32 X X X X X X X 7 % OVER PACE: 16%
31 X X X X X 5
30 X X 2 % UNDER PACE: 18%
29 0
28 X X X 3
27 0
26 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40 25 0
24 0
23 X 1
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
164
DATE
Pace
Cannon Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(c), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
40 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 17 CanCreCli.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Cliffway Drive to Santiago Canyon Road
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/16/2026 TIME START 12:30 TIME STOP: 1:30
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1010 N Cannon St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, no on-street parking, bike lanes 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow striped median, pedestrian crosswalk south of Patria Ct 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 5,499 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.99
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 3 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X 2
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.30 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 X X X X 4
46 X X X X X X 6
45 X X X X 4
44 X X X 3 85TH %: 43 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X 9 50TH %: 39 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P 15TH %: 33 mph
39 X X X X X X X X 8 A
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph
37 X X X X X 5 E
36 X X X X X X X X X 9 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
34 X X X X X 5 % IN PACE: 68%
33 X X X X X X 6
32 X X X 3 % OVER PACE: 15%
31 X X X X 4
30 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 18%
29 X 1
28 X X X 3
27 X X X 3
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 X X 2
24 0
23 0
22 X 1 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
136
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(c), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
40 mph.

Pace
Cannon Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 18 CanCliSan.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Cliffway Drive to Santiago Canyon Road
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/16/2026 TIME START 1:40 TIME STOP: 3:00
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1705 Cannon St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, no on-street parking, bike lanes 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow striped median, signalized intersection at Taft Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 33,296 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.62
53 0
52 0
51 X 1
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 8 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 X X 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.21 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 47 X X X X 4
46 X X X X 4
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 85TH %: 44 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X 9 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 P 50TH %: 39 mph 41 X X X X X X X X 8 A
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C 15TH %: 32 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 E
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph 37 X X X X X X X 7
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 mph 35 X X X X X X X X 8
34 X X X 3 % IN PACE: 69%
33 X X X X 4
32 X X X X X 5 % OVER PACE: 6%
31 X X X X X X X X X 9
30 X X X X 4 % UNDER PACE: 25%
29 X X X 3
28 X X X X X X 6
27 X X X X X 5
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 45
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
188
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
45 mph.

Pace
Cannon Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 19 CanSanSer.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Serrano Avenue to Via Escola
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/16/2026 TIME START 1:40 TIME STOP: 3:00
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2422 Cannon St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 X 1 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 X 1 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, no on-street parking, bike lanes 63 X 1
62 X X 2
61 X X 2 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at Carver Ln 60 X X 2
59 X X X 3
58 X X 2 CONDITIONS NOT
57 X X X 3 READILY APPARENT Continuity of speed, horizontal curvature 56 X X 2
55 X X 2 AVERAGE
54 X X X X X 5 DAILY TRAFFIC: 25,211 SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.17 53 X X X X X X X X X X 10
52 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
51 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A
50 X X X X X X X X 8 C ACCIDENT HISTORY: 16 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X X X X X 6 E
48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.30 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10
46 X X X X 4
45 X X 2
44 X X X 3 85TH %: 57 mph
43 X X X 3 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X 3 50TH %: 51 mph
41 0
40 0 15TH %: 46 mph
39 X X 2
38 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 51 mph
37 X 1
36 0 10 MPH PACE: 46 - 55 mph
35 0
34 0 % IN PACE: 70%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 17%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 13%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 50 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 50
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
111
DATE
Pace
Cannon Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
bike lane, continuity of speed, horizontal
curvature, lane drop, and CVC 22358.6(b),
it is recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 50 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 20 CanSerVia.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Chapman Avenue to Outrider Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/21/2026 TIME START 12:55 TIME STOP: 2:42
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 6600 E Canyon View Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, no on-street parking, bike lanes 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at Brynhurst Rd 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 7,065 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.82
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 1 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.09 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 X 1
46 X X 2 ∧
45 X X X X X X 6
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 85TH %: 44 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 A 50TH %: 41 mph 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 C
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 E 15TH %: 39 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 AVERAGE SPEED: 41 mph
37 X X X X X X X 7
36 0 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 mph
35 0
34 0 % IN PACE: 99%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 1%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 0%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
111
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(c), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
40 mph.

Pace
Canyon View Avenue Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 21 CanChaOut.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Outrider Street to Newport Boulevard
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/21/2026 TIME START 12:36 TIME STOP: 2:07
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 7204 Canyon View Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential, no on-street parking, bike lanes 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at Newport Blvd 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 8,133 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.43
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 1 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.16 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 X 1
46 X X X 3
45 X X X 3
44 X X X X X X X X X 9 85TH %: 43 mph
43 X X X X X X X X 8 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 P 50TH %: 40 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 A
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 C 15TH %: 38 mph 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
38 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 AVERAGE SPEED: 41 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X 10
36 X X X X X 5 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 mph
35 0
34 0 % IN PACE: 96%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 4%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 0%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
112
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(c), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
40 mph.

Pace
Canyon View Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 22 CanOutNew.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Newport Boulevard to White Oak Ridge
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/22/2026 TIME START 10:52 TIME STOP: 12:29
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 7204 Canyon View Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow striped median, signalized intersection at Aspen St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:Equestrian trail
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 5,368 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.42
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 2 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.48 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 41 mph
43 X X X X X 5 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X 8 50TH %: 38 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X 9
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 P 15TH %: 34 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
36 X X X X X X X X 8 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 mph
35 X X X X X X X X 8
34 X X X X X 5 % IN PACE: 86%
33 X X X X 4
32 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 0%
31 X X X 3
30 X X X 3 % UNDER PACE: 14%
29 X 1
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
110
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
40 mph.

Pace
Canyon View Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 23 CanNewWhi.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
White Oak Ridge to Jamboree Road
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/23/2026 TIME START 10:30 TIME STOP: 11:53
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 8500 E Canyon View Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential, no on-street parking, park 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at White Oak Ridge 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:Peters Canyon Parking Area
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 5,368 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.35
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 3 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.88 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 X X X X 4
46 X X X X X 5
45 X X X X X X 6
44 X X X X X X X X X 9 85TH %: 44 mph
43 X X X X X X X X 8 P Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A 50TH %: 41 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 E 15TH %: 37 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
38 X X X X X X X X 8 AVERAGE SPEED: 41 mph
37 X X X X X X X X 8
36 X X X X X 5 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 mph
35 X X X 3
34 X 1 % IN PACE: 88%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 4%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 8%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
107
DATE
Pace
Canyon View Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(c), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
40 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 24 CanWhiJam.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
West City Limits to Lewis Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/13/2026 TIME START 1:41 TIME STOP: 2:24
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 13280 W Chapman Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, no on-street parking south of Chapman Ave 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes westbound, 3 lanes eastbound, raised median, signalized intersection at White Oak Ridge 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT 40 mph in Garden Grove
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 33,423 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.41
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 X X X X X X X X X 9 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 3 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X X X X X X X X 9
48 X X X X X X X X 8 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.12 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 A
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E 85TH %: 48 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X 9 50TH %: 45 mph
41 X X X X X X X X 8
40 X X X 3 15TH %: 42 mph
39 X X 2
38 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 45 mph
37 0
36 0 10 MPH PACE: 41 - 50 mph
35 0
34 0 % IN PACE: 96%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 4%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
121
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on CVC 22358.8, and the segment
characteristics not changing since the last
speed survey, it is recommended to post
the speed limit on this segment at 40 mph.

Pace
Chapman Avenue Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 25 ChaWesLew.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Lewis Street to The City Drive South
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/13/2026 TIME START 11:59 TIME STOP: 1:26
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 3872 W Chapman Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential, commercial, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at Lewis St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:High pedestrian activity
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 31,229 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.39
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 11 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 X X 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.50 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 X 1
46 X X 2
45 X X X X X X X 7
44 X X X X X X X X 8 85TH %: 44 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X 9 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 50TH %: 40 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A 15TH %: 36 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
38 X X X X X X X X X 9 E AVERAGE SPEED: 40 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X 10
36 X X X X X X X 7 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
34 X X 2 % IN PACE: 86%
33 X X 2
32 0 % OVER PACE: 10%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 3%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
117
DATE
Pace
Chapman Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.8, it is recommended to
post the speed limit on this segment at
35 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 26 ChaLewThe.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
The City Dive South to Eckhoff Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/14/2026 TIME START 12:09 TIME STOP: 1:15
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 3072 W Chapman Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial, residential, hospital area, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, signalized intersection at Rampart St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:High pedestrian activity
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 35,932 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.94
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 19 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X 1
48 X X 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.31 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 X X X X 4
46 X X X X X X X 7
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14
44 X X X X X X X X X 9 85TH %: 45 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A 50TH %: 42 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E 15TH %: 39 mph
39 X X X X X X X X 8
38 X X X X X X X 7 AVERAGE SPEED: 42 mph
37 X X X X X X X X 8
36 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 mph
35 0
34 0 % IN PACE: 92%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 7%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 1%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
105
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
high pedestrian activity, hospital area,
continuity of speed, and CVC 22358.6(b),
it is recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 40 mph.

Pace
Chapman Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 27 ChaTheEck.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Eckhoff Street to Main Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/16/2026 TIME START 2:00 TIME STOP: 2:50
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1533 W Chapman Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, signalized intersection at Feldner Rd 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:Continuity of speed
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 27,839 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.45
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 27 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.19 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 X 1
44 0 85TH %: 38 mph
43 X 1 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X 3 50TH %: 32 mph
41 X X 2
40 X X X X 4 15TH %: 28 mph
39 X X X 3
38 X X X X X X 6 AVERAGE SPEED: 33 mph
37 X X X X X 5
36 X X X X X X X 7 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 % IN PACE: 75%
33 X X X X X X X X 8 P
32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A % OVER PACE: 19%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E % UNDER PACE: 6%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
28 X X X X X X X 7
27 X X X X X X X 7
26 X X X 3 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40 25 X X X X 4
24 X 1
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
130
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
continuity of speed, and CVC 22358.6(a),
it is recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 40 mph.

Pace
Chapman Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 28 ChaEckMai.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Main Street to Batavia Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/16/2026 TIME START 3:00 TIME STOP: 4:00
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1031 W Chapman Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Commercial, no on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, signalized intersection at Batavia St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT Continutity of speed, high accident rate 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 18,126 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.31
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 10 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.96 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 X X 2 85TH %: 38 mph
43 X 1 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X 3 50TH %: 34 mph
41 X X X 3
40 X X X 3 15TH %: 30 mph
39 X X X X X 5
38 X X X X X X X X X 9 AVERAGE SPEED: 34 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 mph 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 P
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 A % IN PACE: 80%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E % OVER PACE: 11%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 % UNDER PACE: 9%
29 X X X X X X X 7
28 X X X X 4
27 X X X 3
26 X X X 3 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35 25 X X 2
24 X 1
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
149
DATE
Pace
Chapman Avenue Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
pedestrian crossings, continuity of speed,
high accident rate, and CVC 22358.6(c), it
is recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 35 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 29 ChaMaiBat.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Batavia Street to Lemon Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/20/2026 TIME START 1:58 TIME STOP: 3:11
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 632 W Chapman Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, pedestrian crosswalk at Pixley St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:High pedestrian activity, high accident rate 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 14,881 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.38
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 25 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 2.45 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 36 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 30 mph
41 X X 2
40 X X 2 15TH %: 25 mph
39 X 1
38 X X 2 AVERAGE SPEED: 30 mph
37 X X X X 4
36 X X X X X 5 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 mph
35 X X X X 4
34 X X X X X 5 % IN PACE: 68%
33 X X X X X X X 7
32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 % OVER PACE: 25%
31 X X X X X X 6
30 X X X X X X 6 P % UNDER PACE: 7%
29 X X X X X X X X 8 A
28 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
27 X X X X 4 E
26 X X X X X 5 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 30 25 X X X X X X 6
24 X X X X X X 6
23 X X X 3
22 X X 2 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X X 2
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
101
DATE
Pace
Chapman Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
high pedestrian activity, railroad crossing,
multiple driveways, pedestrian crossings,
high accident rate, and CVC 22358.6(b), it
is recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 30 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 30 ChaBatLem.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Lemon Street to Center Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/20/2026 TIME START 9:00 TIME STOP: 9:55
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 277 E Chapman Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Commercial, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:1 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Grand St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT High pedestrian activity, high accident rate 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 12,499 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.33
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 32 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 4.28 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 29 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 25 mph
41 0
40 0 15TH %: 21 mph
39 0
38 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 25 mph
37 0
36 X X 2 10 MPH PACE: 20 - 29 mph
35 X 1
34 X X 2 % IN PACE: 80%
33 0
32 X X X 3 % OVER PACE: 14%
31 X X X 3
30 X X X X X 5 % UNDER PACE: 7%
29 X X X X X 5 ∧
28 X X X X X X X X 8
27 X X X X X X X X X X 10
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 P EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 25 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
23 X X X X X X X X 8 E
22 X X X X X X X X X 9 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X X X X X 5
20 X X X X X X X X X X 10
19 X X X X X 5 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 X X X 3
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
123
DATE
Pace
Chapman Avenue Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(c), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
25 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 31 ChaLemCen.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Center Street to Cambridge Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/20/2026 TIME START 10:00 TIME STOP: 10:50
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 618 E Chapman Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Shaffer St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:High pedestrian activity, continuity of speed 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 18,535 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.31
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 9 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.85 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 X 1 85TH %: 37 mph
43 X X 2 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X 2 50TH %: 33 mph
41 X X 2
40 X X 2 15TH %: 28 mph
39 X X 2
38 X X X X X 5 AVERAGE SPEED: 33 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 mph 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 P % IN PACE: 77%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A
32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C % OVER PACE: 11%
31 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 % UNDER PACE: 12%
29 X X X X X X X X X X 10
28 X X X X X X X X X 9
27 X X X X X X X 7
26 X X X X X X 6 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 30 25 X X X 3
24 X 1
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X 1
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
149
DATE
Pace
Chapman Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
high pedestrian activity, lane drop,
continuity of speed, and CVC 22358.6(b),
it is recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 30 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 32 ChaCenCam.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Cambridge Street to Tustin Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/20/2026 TIME START 11:00 TIME STOP: 11:50
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1303 E Chapman Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, signalized intersection at Tustin St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 23,405 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 15 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.70 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 X 1
46 0
45 0
44 X X 2 85TH %: 37 mph
43 X X X 3 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X 3 50TH %: 33 mph
41 X 1
40 X X X X X 5 15TH %: 29 mph
39 X X 2
38 X X X X 4 AVERAGE SPEED: 33 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X 9
36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P % IN PACE: 78%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C % OVER PACE: 14%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 % UNDER PACE: 8%
29 X X X X X X X X X 9
28 X X X X X X X X 8
27 X X X X X 5
26 X X X 3 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35 25 X 1
24 X X 2
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
145
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
35 mph.

Pace
Chapman Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 33 ChaCamTus.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Tustin Street to Yorba Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/15/2026 TIME START 9:00 TIME STOP: 10:15
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2501 E Chapman Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial, hospital area, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at Yorba St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 65,612 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.31
53 X 1
52 X 1
51 0
50 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 28 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X 1
48 X X X X X 5 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.76 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 X X 2
46 X X 2
45 X X X X 4
44 X X X X X X X 7 85TH %: 43 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X 9 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X 9 50TH %: 39 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 P
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 A 15TH %: 36 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 29 C 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 E AVERAGE SPEED: 39 mph 37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
36 X X X X X X X X X 9 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 mph
35 X X X X X X 6
34 X X X X 4 % IN PACE: 79%
33 X X X X 4
32 X X X 3 % OVER PACE: 10%
31 X X 2
30 X X 2 % UNDER PACE: 10%
29 X X 2
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
163
DATE
Pace
Chapman Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(c), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
40 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 34 ChaTusYor.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Yorba Street to Prospect Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/15/2026 TIME START 10:25 TIME STOP: 11:45
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2937 E Chapman Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, signalized intersection at Yorba St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:High accident rate
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 50,659 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50
53 0
52 X 1
51 0
50 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 53 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X 1
48 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.15 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 X 1
46 X X 2
45 X X X 3
44 X 1 85TH %: 41 mph
43 X X X X X X 6 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X 5 50TH %: 36 mph
41 X X X X X X 6
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 15TH %: 31 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 P
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A AVERAGE SPEED: 36 mph 37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 E 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 mph 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 % IN PACE: 70%
33 X X X X X X X 7
32 X X X X X 5 % OVER PACE: 10%
31 X X X X X 5
30 X X X X 4 % UNDER PACE: 20%
29 X X X X 4
28 X X 2
27 X X X X X X 6
26 X X X 3 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40 25 X X X 3
24 X X 2
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
172
DATE
Pace
Chapman Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
40 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 35 ChaYorPro.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Prospect Street to Rancho Santiago Boulevard
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/15/2026 TIME START 12:15 TIME STOP: 1:15
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 4020 E Chapman Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential/Commercial, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, signalized intersection at Esplanade St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 39,410 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.98
53 0
52 X 1
51 0
50 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 70 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 X X 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.99 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 X X X 3
46 X X X X X X 6
45 X X X X X X X 7
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 85TH %: 44 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 P Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 A 50TH %: 41 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 E 15TH %: 38 mph 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16
38 X X X X X X X X 8 AVERAGE SPEED: 41 mph
37 X X X X X X 6
36 X X X X X 5 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 mph
35 X X X X 4
34 X X 2 % IN PACE: 85%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 5%
31 X 1
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 10%
29 0
28 X 1
27 X 1
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 X 1
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
144
DATE
Pace
Chapman Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(c), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
40 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 36 ChaProRan.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Rancho Santiago Boulevard to Crawford Canyon/Cannon
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/15/2026 TIME START 1:45 TIME STOP: 2:28
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 4020 E Chapman Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential/Commercial, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 X 1 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, signalized intersection at Rancho Santiago Blvd 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 X 1 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 29,279 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.32
53 0
52 X X X 3
51 X X X X X X X X 8
50 X X X X X X X X 8 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 7 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X X X X X X X 8
48 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.41 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.87 acc/mvm 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 P
46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 C
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E 85TH %: 49 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 50TH %: 45 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X 10
40 X X X X X X X 7 15TH %: 40 mph
39 X X X X X X X 7
38 X X X X X X X 7 AVERAGE SPEED: 45 mph
37 X X X X 4
36 0 10 MPH PACE: 41 - 50 mph
35 X X X 3
34 X 1 % IN PACE: 74%
33 X 1
32 X 1 % OVER PACE: 8%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 18%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 45
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
172
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(c), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
45 mph.

Pace
Chapman Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 37 ChaRanCra.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Crawford Canyon/Cannon to Calle Grande
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/21/2026 TIME START 10:52 TIME STOP: 12:33
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 19701 E Chapman Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential/Commercial, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow striped median, signalized intersection at Cliffway Dr, bike lanes 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 X X X X X 5 DAILY TRAFFIC: 16,585 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.92 53 X X X X X X 6
52 X X X X X X X 7
51 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 P
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 A ACCIDENT HISTORY: 10 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E ACCIDENT RATE: 0.36 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10
46 X X X X X X X 7
45 X X X X X X X X 8
44 X X X X X 5 85TH %: 52 mph
43 X X X X X X 6 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 49 mph
41 0
40 0 15TH %: 45 mph
39 0
38 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 49 mph
37 0
36 0 10 MPH PACE: 45 - 54 mph
35 0
34 0 % IN PACE: 90%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 10%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 50 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 50
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
110
DATE
Pace
Chapman Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
50 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 38 ChaCraCal.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Calle Grande to Newport Boulevard
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/21/2026 TIME START 9:00 TIME STOP: 10:33
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: County Route S25
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow striped median, signalized intersection at Newport Blvd, 60 0 bike lanes
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 15,677 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.73
53 X X X X X X X X X X 10
52 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
51 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 26 C ACCIDENT HISTORY: 4 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 E
48 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.19 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
46 X X X X X X 6
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 52 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 50 mph
41 0
40 0 15TH %: 47 mph
39 0
38 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 50 mph
37 0
36 0 10 MPH PACE: 46 - 55 mph
35 0
34 0 % IN PACE: 100%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 0%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 50 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 50
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
110
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
50 mph.

Pace
Chapman Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 39 ChaCalNew.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Newport Boulevard to Jamboree Road
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/22/2026 TIME START 12:08 TIME STOP: 1:33
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 8474 E Chapman Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at Jamboree Rd, bike lanes 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 X X X X X X 6 DAILY TRAFFIC: 15,607 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.61 53 X X X X X X X 7
52 X X X X X X X X X 9
51 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 29 A ACCIDENT HISTORY: 9 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
48 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E ACCIDENT RATE: 0.51 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.87 acc/mvm 47 X X X X X X X X X 9
46 X X X X X X X X X 9
45 X X X X X X X X X X 10
44 X X X X X X 6 85TH %: 52 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 50 mph
41 0
40 0 15TH %: 46 mph
39 0
38 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 49 mph
37 0
36 0 10 MPH PACE: 45 - 54 mph
35 0
34 0 % IN PACE: 95%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 5%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 50 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 50
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
123
DATE
Pace
Chapman Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
50 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 40 ChaNewJam.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Garden Grove Boulevard to Outlet Drive
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/14/2026 TIME START 12:08 TIME STOP: 1:25
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 747 The City Dr S
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 4 lanes each direction, double yellow striped centerline, signalized intersection at Garden Grove Blvd 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 16,092 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.51
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 8 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.54 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 38 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 35 mph
41 0
40 X X 2 15TH %: 32 mph
39 X X X X X X X 7
38 X X X X X X X X 8 AVERAGE SPEED: 35 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 P 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 mph 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 A
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C % IN PACE: 98%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 % OVER PACE: 2%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
30 X X X X X 5 % UNDER PACE: 0%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
110
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(c), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
35 mph.

Pace
The City Drive
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 41 TheGarOut.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Outlet Drive to Chapman Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/14/2026 TIME START 10:38 TIME STOP: 11:57
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 345 The City Dr S
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 4 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at The City Way 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 30,944 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.49
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 10 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.36 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 38 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 35 mph
41 0
40 X X X 3 15TH %: 32 mph
39 X X X X X X X 7
38 X X X X X X X X X 9 AVERAGE SPEED: 35 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X 9
36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C % IN PACE: 97% 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E
32 X X X X X X X X X 9 % OVER PACE: 3%
31 X X X X X X 6
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 % UNDER PACE: 0%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
108
DATE
Pace
The City Drive
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(c), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment at
35 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 42 TheOutCha.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Outlet Drive to Chapman Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/13/2026 TIME START 12:58 TIME STOP: 2:20
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 200 The City Dr N
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Hotel/Hospital, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 4 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at Chapman Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:Continuity of speed, high pedestrian activity, hospital area 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 27,349 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.26
53 X 1
52 X X X 3
51 X X 2
50 X X X X X X 6 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 2 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X X X X X X 7
48 X X X X X X X 7 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.15 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 A
44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C 85TH %: 48 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X 9 50TH %: 45 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
40 X X X X X X X 7 15TH %: 41 mph
39 X X X X X 5
38 X X 2 AVERAGE SPEED: 45 mph
37 0
36 0 10 MPH PACE: 40 - 49 mph
35 0
34 0 % IN PACE: 85%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 10%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 6%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
125
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
high pedestrian activity, hospital area,
continuity of speed, and CVC 22358.7(a)(2),
it is recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 40 mph.

Pace
The City Drive
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 43 TheChaAna.xlsx.xls 8/3/2026
Eckhoff Street to Main Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/14/2026 TIME START 9:00 TIME STOP: 9:40
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1702 W Collins Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Commercial, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, all-way stop-control at Eckhoff St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 6,393 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.43
53 X 1
52 0
51 X 1
50 X X X 3 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 4 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.80 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 47 X 1
46 X X 2
45 X X X X 4
44 X X X X 4 85TH %: 42 mph
43 X X X X X 5 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X 8 50TH %: 37 mph
41 X X X X X X 6
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P 15TH %: 32 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C AVERAGE SPEED: 37 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E
36 X X X X X X X X X 9 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17
34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 % IN PACE: 69%
33 X X X 3
32 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 12%
31 X X 2
30 X X X X X X 6 % UNDER PACE: 20%
29 X X 2
28 X X X 3
27 X X X 3
26 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40 25 X X 2
24 X X X 3
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
147
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended to
to post the speed limit on this segment at
40 mph.

Pace
Collins Ave Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 44 ColEckMai.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Main Street to Batavia Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/14/2026 TIME START 9:00 TIME STOP: 9:40
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1035 W Collins Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Commercial, no on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Batavia St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 10,701 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.28
53 0
52 0
51 X 1
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 1 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.18 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 X X 2
44 X X X 3 85TH %: 42 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X 9 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X 9 50TH %: 37 mph
41 X X X X X X 6
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 15TH %: 32 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A AVERAGE SPEED: 37 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
36 X X X X X X X X 8 E 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 % IN PACE: 70%
33 X X X X X X X X X X 10
32 X X X X X X X X X 9 % OVER PACE: 11%
31 X X X X X X 6
30 X X X X 4 % UNDER PACE: 19%
29 X X 2
28 X X 2
27 X X 2
26 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40 25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
138
DATE
Pace
Collins Ave Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended to
to post the speed limit on this segment at
40 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 45 ColMaiBat.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Batavia Street to Glassell St
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/14/2026 TIME START: 10:35 TIME STOP: 11:10 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 566 W Collins Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Commercial, no on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, signalized intersection at Batavia St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 14,923 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 19 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.40 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 38 mph
43 X X X 3 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X 2 50TH %: 34 mph
41 X X X X X 5
40 X X X X 4 15TH %: 29 mph
39 X X X X X X X 7
38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 ∧ AVERAGE SPEED: 34 mph
37 X X X X X X X X 8 ∧
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 ∧ 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 mph 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A % IN PACE: 71%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E % OVER PACE: 14%
31 X X X X X X X X 8 ∨
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 ∨ % UNDER PACE: 15%
29 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨
28 X X X X X X X 7
27 X X X X X 5
26 X X X X 4 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35 25 X X X 3
24 X 1
23 X 1
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X 1
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
150
DATE
Pace
Collins Ave
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
multiple driveways, railroad crossing,
uncontrolled pedestian activity and CVC
22358.6(c), it is recommended to post the
speed limit on this segment at 35 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 46 ColBatGla.xlsx.xls 8/10/2026
Glasell Street Cambridge Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/14/2026 TIME START 12:30 TIME STOP: 1:10
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 648 E Collins Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Cambridge St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 17,820 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 11 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.67 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 X X 2 85TH %: 39 mph
43 X X X 3 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X 3 50TH %: 33 mph
41 X X X X X 5
40 X X X X X 5 15TH %: 29 mph
39 X X X X X X 6
38 X X X X 4 AVERAGE SPEED: 34 mph
37 X X X X X X X X 8
36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
34 X X X X X X X X 8 P % IN PACE: 75%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C % OVER PACE: 20%
31 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 % UNDER PACE: 5%
29 X X X X X X X 7
28 X X X X X X X X X X 10
27 X X X X 4
26 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35 25 X 1
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
139
DATE
Pace
Collins Ave Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(c), it is recommended to
to post the speed limit on this segment at
40 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 47 ColGlaCam.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Cambridge Street to Tustin Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/14/2026 TIME START 1:20 TIME STOP: 2:00
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1231 E Collins Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, on-street parking, school zone 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, pedestrian crosswalk at California St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT High Pedestrian Activity
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 15,689 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50
53 0
52 0
51 X 1
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 27 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X 1
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.88 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 47 X X 2
46 X 1
45 X 1
44 X X 2 85TH %: 40 mph
43 X X 2 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X 4 50TH %: 36 mph
41 X X X X 4
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 15TH %: 32 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 AVERAGE SPEED: 36 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 A 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 mph 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
34 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % IN PACE: 79%
33 X X X X X X X X X 9
32 X X X X X X X X X 9 % OVER PACE: 13%
31 X X X X X X X X 8
30 X X X X X X 6 % UNDER PACE: 8%
29 X X X 3
28 X X 2
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
138
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed, school
area, high accident rate, on-street parking
residential area, pedestrian crossing, high
pedestrian activity, and CVC 22358.6(b)
it is recommended to post the speed limit
on this segment at 35 mph.

Pace
Collins Ave Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 48 ColCamTus.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Tustin Street to Handy Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/14/2026 TIME START 3:10 TIME STOP: 4:00
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2269 E Collins Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, no on-street parking, school zone 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Hnady St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT Continuity of Speed, Vertical Curve 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 13,479 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 9 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.73 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 47 0
46 X X 2
45 X X X X 4
44 X X X X X X 6 85TH %: 43 mph
43 X X X X X X 6 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X 9 50TH %: 38 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A 15TH %: 34 mph
39 X X X X X X X X 8 C
38 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10
34 X X X X X X 6 % IN PACE: 79%
33 X X X X X 5
32 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 5%
31 X X X 3
30 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 16%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
117
DATE
Pace
Collins Ave Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed, school
area, continuity of speed, vertical curve,
on-street parking, and CVC 22358.7(a)(2),
it is recommended to post the speed limit
on this segment at 35 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 49 ColTusHan.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Handy Street to Wanda Road
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/23/2026 TIME START 2:20 TIME STOP: 3:55
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2822 E Collins Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, on-street parking, school zone 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Wanda Rd 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT Continuity of Speed
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 16,990 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.29
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 6 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.67 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 47 0
46 X 1
45 X X 2
44 X X X X X X X X 8 85TH %: 42 mph
43 X X X X X X 6 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 50TH %: 40 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 P
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 A 15TH %: 37 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E AVERAGE SPEED: 40 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
36 X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 mph
35 X X X 3
34 0 % IN PACE: 96%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 3%
31 X 1
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 1%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
112
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
continuity of speed, on-street parking,
residential area, multiple driveways, trail,
and CVC 22358.6(b), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment
at 35 mph.

Pace
Collins Ave Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 50 ColHanWan.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Wanda Road to Bond Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/22/2026 TIME START 2:05 TIME STOP: 3:50
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 3340 E Collins Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, signalized intersection at Wanda Rd 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT Continuity of Speed, Horizontal Curve 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 17,262 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.63
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 15 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.76 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 X 1
46 X X X 3
45 X X X X 4
44 X X X X X X X 7 85TH %: 43 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X 9 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 50TH %: 40 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 P
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 A 15TH %: 37 mph 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E AVERAGE SPEED: 40 mph
37 X X X X X X X 7
36 X X X X X X X X 8 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 mph
35 X X X X X 5
34 X X 2 % IN PACE: 90%
33 X 1
32 X 1 % OVER PACE: 7%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 3%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
120
DATE
Pace
Collins Ave Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
continuity of speed, on-street parking,
residential area, multiple driveways, bike trail,
and CVC 22358.7(a)(2), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment
at 35 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 51 ColWanBon.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Sycamore Avenue to Orangewood Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/16/2026 TIME START 10:35 TIME STOP: 11:15
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 470 N Eckhoff St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, all-way stop-control at Sycamore Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 3,542 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.21
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 1 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.74 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 35 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 31 mph
41 0
40 X 1 15TH %: 27 mph
39 X X X 3
38 X X X 3 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 mph
37 X X X X X X X 7
36 X X X X 4 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∧
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 % IN PACE: 81%
33 X X X X X X 6
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 P % OVER PACE: 15%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C % UNDER PACE: 4%
29 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
28 X X X X X X X X X 9
27 X X X X X X X X 8
26 X X X X X X X 7 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35 25 X X X 3
24 X 1
23 X 1
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
121
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment
at 35 mph.

Pace
Eckhoff Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 52 EckSycOra.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Orangewood Avenue to Collins Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/16/2026 TIME START 9:00 TIME STOP: 9:45
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 829 N Eckhoff St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Commercial, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:1 lane each direction, two-way left-turn median, all-way stop-control at Collins Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 7,855 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.46
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 5 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.76 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 X 1
45 0
44 X 1 85TH %: 40 mph
43 X X X X 4 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X 3 50TH %: 35 mph
41 X X X X X X X X 8
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 15TH %: 30 mph
39 X X X X X X X X 8
38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P AVERAGE SPEED: 35 mph
37 X X X X X X 6 A
36 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
34 X X X X X X X X X 14 % IN PACE: 69%
33 X X X X X X X X X X 8
32 X X X X X X X X X X X 10 % OVER PACE: 6%
31 X X X X X X X 8
30 X X X X X X X 10 % UNDER PACE: 25%
29 X X X X X 5
28 X X X X X 4
27 X 4
26 X X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40 25 1
24 0
23 X 1
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 X 1
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
140
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended
to post the speed limit on this segment
at 40 mph.

Pace
Eckhoff Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 53 EckOraCol.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Fairhaven Avenue to La Veta Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/28/2026 TIME START 9:57 TIME STOP: 11:37
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 696 S Esplanade St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, pedestrian crosswalk at Jordan Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 3,429 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.47
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 3 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X 2
48 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.02 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.77 acc/mvm 47 X 1
46 0
45 X X X 3
44 X X X X X 5 85TH %: 42 mph
43 X X 2 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X 9 50TH %: 38 mph
41 X X X X X X 6
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 15TH %: 33 mph
39 X X X X X X 6 P
38 X X X X X 5 A AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
36 X X X X X X X X 8 E 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 mph
35 X X X X X X X 7
34 X X X X X 5 % IN PACE: 73%
33 X X X X X 5
32 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 15%
31 X X X X 4
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 12%
29 X X X 3
28 0
27 0
26 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35 25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
100
DATE
Pace
Esplanade Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed, residential
area, street parking, no left turn pockets,
uncontrolled pedestrian crossing, school
area, multiple driveways, and
and CVC 22358.6(b), it is
recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 35 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 54 EspFaiLav.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
La Veta Avenue to Chapman Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/16/2026 TIME START 1:30 TIME STOP: 2:18
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 327 S Esplanade St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, all-way stop-control at Palmyra Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 5,340 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.51
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 4 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 X X 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.80 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 47 X X 2
46 X 1
45 X X X 3
44 X X 2 85TH %: 41 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X 3 50TH %: 36 mph
41 X X X X X X X X 8
40 X X X X X X X 7 15TH %: 32 mph
39 X X X 3
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P AVERAGE SPEED: 37 mph 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 A
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 mph 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 E
34 X X X X X X X X X 12 % IN PACE: 77%
33 X X X 5
32 X X X X X X X 7 % OVER PACE: 11%
31 X X X X 2
30 X 4 % UNDER PACE: 11%
29 X X X 1
28 2
27 X X 0
26 X 3 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35 25 X X 1
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X 1
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
123
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
lane drop, no left turn storage lanes,
residential area, continuity of speed, onstreet parking, and CVC 22358.6(b), it is recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 35 mph.

Pace
Esplanade Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 55 EspLavCha.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Greengrove Street to Yorba Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/28/2026 TIME START 9:14 TIME STOP: 9:46
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 16790 Fairhaven Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION Residential, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Tustin Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT Vertical Curve
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 14,994 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.66
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 7 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 X X X X 4 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.39 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 X X X X X 5
46 X X X X X X 6
45 X X X X X X X X 8
44 X X X 3 85TH %: 45 mph
43 X X X X X X X X 8 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X 4 50TH %: 39 mph
41 X X X X X 5
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P 15TH %: 33 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
38 X X X X X 5 C AVERAGE SPEED: 39 mph
37 X X X X X X X X 8 E
36 X X X X X X 6 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 mph
35 X X X X 4
34 X X X X X X X X 8 % IN PACE: 61%
33 X X X X 4
32 X X X X X X 6 % OVER PACE: 23%
31 X X X X X 5
30 X X X 3 % UNDER PACE: 16%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
113
DATE
Pace
Fairhaven Avenue Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
vertical curve, continuity of speed (40 mph
in Santa Ana), and CVC 22358.6(b),
it is recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 40 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 56 FaiGreYor.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Batavia Avenue to Glassell Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/16/2026 TIME START: 9:00 TIME STOP: 10:45
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 515 W Fletcher Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Commercial, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:1 lane each direction, two-way left-turn median, pedestrian crosswalk at American Way 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 3,190 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.51
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 2 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.68 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 X 1
45 X X 2
44 X 1 85TH %: 40 mph
43 X X X X 4 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X 2 50TH %: 34 mph
41 X X X 3
40 X X X X X 5 15TH %: 27 mph
39 X X X X 4
38 X X X X X 5 ∧ AVERAGE SPEED: 33 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 ∧
36 X X X X 4 ∧ 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 mph
35 X X X X X X X 8 P
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A % IN PACE: 66%
33 X X X X X X X 6 C
32 X X X X X X X 8 E % OVER PACE: 21%
31 X X X X X X 7 ∨
30 X X X X X X 6 ∨ % UNDER PACE: 13%
29 X X X X 5 ∨
28 X X 2
27 X 2
26 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 30 25 X X 0
24 X 1
23 X 1
22 X 1 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X X 2
20 0
19 X 1 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 X X 2
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
106
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
street parking, school area, high pedestrian
uncontrolled pedestrian crossing
and CVC 22358.7(a)(2), it is
recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 30 mph.

Pace
Fletcher Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 57 FleBatGla.xlsx.xls 8/10/2026
West City Limits to The City Drive
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/14/2026 TIME START: 10:33 TIME STOP: 11:52 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 3919 W Garden Grove Blvd
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, signalized intersection at Lewis St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 16,792 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.42
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 12 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 X X X 3
46 X X X X X X X 7 ∧
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 ∧
44 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∧ 85TH %: 45 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 P
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A 50TH %: 42 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E 15TH %: 39 mph and CVC 22358.6(b), it is 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 ∨ recommended to post the speed limit on 38 X X X X X X X 7 ∨ AVERAGE SPEED: 42 mph this segment at 40 mph. 37 X X X X X X 6 ∨
36 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 mph
35 0
34 0 % IN PACE: 94%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 4%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 3%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 X 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
113
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
Pace
Garden Grove Boulevard
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 58 GarWesThe.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
The City Drive to East City Limits (Lewis Street)
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/14/2026 TIME START: 9:00 TIME STOP: 10:18
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2903 W Memory Ln
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:3 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at The City Dr S 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:Continuiy of Speed, High Accident Rate 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 35,223 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.14
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 12 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.36 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 X X X X X 5
46 X X X X X X X X 8 ∧
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∧
44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 ∧ 85TH %: 45 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A 50TH %: 41 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 E 15TH %: 38 mph and CVC 22358.6(b), it is 39 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 ∨ recommended to post the speed limit on 38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 ∨ AVERAGE SPEED: 41 mph this segment at 40 mph. 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨
36 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 mph
35 5
34 0 % IN PACE: 90%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 4%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 6%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 X 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
124
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
Pace
Garden Grove Boulevard
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 59 GarTheEas.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
South City Limits (22 Freeway) to La Veta Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/22/2026 TIME START: 9:00 TIME STOP: 10:15
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 620 S Glassell St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:2 lanes each direction, raised median, pedestrian crosswalk at East River Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 31,471 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.38
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 7 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.32 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 34 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 31 mph
41 0
40 0 15TH %: 28 mph
39 X X 2
38 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 mph
37 X X X 3
36 X X X X 4 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X 7 ∧
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 12 ∧ % IN PACE: 90%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 ∧
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 P % OVER PACE: 7% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 25 C % UNDER PACE: 3% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X 11 ∨
27 X X X X X X X X 9 ∨
26 X X X X X 8 ∨ EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 30 25 X X 3
24 X X 2
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
153
DATE
Pace
Glassell Street
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
street parking, uncontrolled pedestrian
crossing, park and CVC 22358.6(c), it is
recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 30 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 60 GlaSouLav.xlsx.xls 8/10/2026
La Veta Avenue to Almond Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/22/2026 TIME START: 10:25 TIME STOP: 11:45 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 350 Glassell St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, pedestrian crosswalk at Culver Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 12,496 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.38
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 23 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 2.69 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 32 mph
43 0
42 0 50TH %: 28 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 0
40 X 1 15TH %: 24 mph and CVC 22358.6(a), it is
39 0 recommended to post the speed limit on
38 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 28 mph this segment at 30 mph.
37 0
36 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 mph
35 X X X X X 3
34 X X X 5 % IN PACE: 86%
33 X X X X X X 4
32 X X X X X X X X 8 ∧ % OVER PACE: 11%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 ∧
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 ∧ % UNDER PACE: 3%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 A
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 E EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 30 25 X X X X X X X X X 12 ∨
24 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨
23 X X X X X 5 ∨
22 X X X 3 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X 1
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
138
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
Pace
Glassell Street
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 61 GlaLavAlm.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Almond Avenue to Maple Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/22/2026 TIME START 9:00 TIME STOP: 10:34
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 162 Glassell St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Commercial, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, all-way stop-control at Maple Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 9,739 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.27
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 19 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 3.92 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 23 mph
43 0
42 0 50TH %: 19 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 0
40 0 15TH %: 17 mph and CVC 22358.6(a), it is
39 0 recommended to post the speed limit on
38 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 20 mph this segment at 25 mph.
37 0
36 0 10 MPH PACE: 14 - 23 mph
35 0
34 0 % IN PACE: 88%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 7%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 5%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 25 25 X X 2
24 X X X 3
23 X X X X 4
22 X X X 3 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X X X X X 5
20 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
19 X X X X X X X 7 A REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C
17 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
14 X X X X X X X X 8
13 X X X 3
12 X 1
11 X 1
100
DATE
Pace
Glassell Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 62 GlaAlmMap.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Maple Avenue to Walnut Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/15/2026 TIME START: 11:30 TIME STOP: 12:15 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 462 N Glassell St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Walnut Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:Continuity of Speed, High Accident Rate, High Pedestrian Activity 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 8,467 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.37
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 13 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 2.26 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 30 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 26 mph
41 0
40 0 15TH %: 22 mph
39 0
38 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 25 mph
37 0
36 0 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 mph
35 X 0
34 X 1 % IN PACE: 87%
33 X X 1
32 X X X X 3 % OVER PACE: 4%
31 X X X X X X 6 ∧
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∧ % UNDER PACE: 9%
29 X X X X X X X X X X 8 ∧
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 25 25 X X X X X X X X X 13 E
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 ∨
23 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 ∨
22 X X X X X X X 7 ∨ OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X X X 3
20 X X X X 4
19 X X 2 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 X X 2
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
122
DATE
Pace
Glassell Street
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
street parking, continuity of speed, high
accident rate, high pedestrian activity,
downtown district, uncontrolled pedestrian
crossing and CVC 22358.6(b), it is
recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 25 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 63 GlaMapWal.xlsx.xls 8/10/2026
Walnut Avenue to Collins Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/14/2026 TIME START 11:20 TIME STOP: 12:00
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 759 Glassell St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, pedestrian crosswalk at Mayfair Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 13,001 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 14 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.18 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 X 1
45 0
44 X 1 85TH %: 34 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X 1 50TH %: 30 mph
41 0
40 X X 2 15TH %: 26 mph
39 X 1
38 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 30 mph
37 X X X 3
36 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 mph
35 X X X X X 5
34 X X X X X X X X X 9 % IN PACE: 77%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P % OVER PACE: 11%
31 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C % UNDER PACE: 12%
29 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X 10
27 X X X X X X X X X X 10
26 X X X X X X X X 8 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 30 25 X X X X X 5
24 X X X X 4
23 X X X 3
22 X 1 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X X 2
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
123
DATE
Pace
Glassell Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed, street
parking, uncontrolled pedestrian crossing,
residential area and CVC 22358.6(c), it is
recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 30 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 64 GlaWalCol.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Collins Avenue to Katella Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/13/2026 TIME START: 3:00 TIME STOP: 4:00
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1098 Glassell St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Wilson Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 13,728 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.46
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 14 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.21 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 0
46 X 1
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 38 mph
43 X 1 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X 4 50TH %: 32 mph
41 X X X 3
40 X X X X X X X 7 15TH %: 27 mph
39 X X X X 4
38 X X X X X X X X 8 AVERAGE SPEED: 33 mph
37 X X X X X X 6
36 X X X X X X X 7 ∧ 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 ∧
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 ∧ % IN PACE: 66%
33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A % OVER PACE: 22%
31 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E % UNDER PACE: 11%
29 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 ∨
27 X X X X X X X X 8 ∨
26 X X X X X 5 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35 25 X X X X X X 6
24 X X X 3
23 X X 2
22 X 1 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
152
DATE
Pace
Glassell Street
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
street parking, residential area,
lane drop and CVC 22358.6(c), it is
recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 35 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 65 GlaColKat.xlsx.xls 8/10/2026
Katella Avenue to Taft Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/20/2026 TIME START: 11:02 TIME STOP: 11:28 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1641 Glassell St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, signalized intersection at Taft Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 21,720 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.46
53 0
52 0
51 X 1
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 18 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.99 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 X X 2
46 X X 2
45 X X X X 4
44 X 1 85TH %: 43 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 ∧
42 X X X X 4 ∧ 50TH %: 37 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X X 4 ∧
40 X X 2 P 15TH %: 33 mph and CVC 22358.6(c), it is
39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A recommended to post the speed limit on 38 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C AVERAGE SPEED: 37 mph this segment at 40 mph. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E
36 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨ 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 mph
35 X X X X X X X 7 ∨
34 X X X X X X X 7 ∨ % IN PACE: 68%
33 X X X X X X X X X X 10
32 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 10%
31 X X 2
30 X X X X 4 % UNDER PACE: 23%
29 X X X X 4
28 X 1
27 X 1
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
114
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
Pace
Glassell Street
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 66 GlaKatTaf.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Taft Avenue to Meats Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/16/2026 TIME START: 11:11 TIME STOP: 11:47 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2331 N Glassell St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Commercial, no on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, signalized intersection at Fletcher Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 13,707 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 6 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 X X X 3 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.48 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 47 X X X 3
46 X X X 3
45 X X X 3
44 X X X X X X X 7 85TH %: 44 mph
43 X X X 3
42 X X 2 50TH %: 37 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X 3 ∧
40 X X X X X X 6 ∧ 15TH %: 33 mph and CVC 22358.6(a), it is 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∧ recommended to post the speed limit on 38 X X X X X X 6 P AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph this segment at 45 mph. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 A
36 X X X X X X X X X 9 C 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 mph
35 0 E
34 X X X X X X 6 ∨ % IN PACE: 67%
33 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨
32 X X X X X X 6 ∨ % OVER PACE: 24%
31 X X X 3
30 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 9%
29 X X X 3
28 X 1
27 X 1
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 45
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
100
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
Pace
Glassell Street
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 67 GlaTafMea.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Meats Avenue to Fletcher Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/14/2026 TIME START: 11:00 TIME STOP: 11:54 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2050 N Glassell St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Commercial, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, signalized intersection at Grove Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 17,583 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.44
53 0
52 0
51 X X X 3
50 X X 2 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 3 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X X X X X X 7 ∧
48 X X X X X X X 7 ∧ ACCIDENT RATE: 0.21 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 47 X X X X X X X 7 ∧
46 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
44 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C 85TH %: 48 mph
43 X X X X X X X X 8 E
42 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨ 50TH %: 44 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X X X X X X 8 ∨
40 X X X X X X X X 8 ∨ 15TH %: 40 mph and CVC 22358.6(c), it is 39 X X X X X X X 7 recommended to post the speed limit on 38 X X X 3 AVERAGE SPEED: 44 mph this segment at 45 mph. 37 X X 2
36 X X 2 10 MPH PACE: 40 - 49 mph
35 X 1
34 0 % IN PACE: 81%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 5%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 14%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 45
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
105
DATE
Pace
Glassell Street
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 68 GlaMeaFle.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Fletcher Avenue to Lincoln Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/20/2026 TIME START: 107/14/20 TIME STOP: 11:30 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2754 Glassell St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at Lincoln Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 17,252 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.45
53 0
52 0
51 X 1
50 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 7 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X 1
48 X X 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.50 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 47 X X 2
46 X 1
45 X X X X X X X X 8 ∧
44 X X X X X X 6 ∧ 85TH %: 43 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 ∧ Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 P 50TH %: 40 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 A
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 C 15TH %: 35 mph 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 ∨ AVERAGE SPEED: 40 mph 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨
36 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨ 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 mph
35 X X X X X X X X 8
34 X X X 3 % IN PACE: 78%
33 X X X X X 5
32 X X X X X X X 7 % OVER PACE: 5%
31 X 1
30 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 17%
29 0
28 0
27 X 1
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 45
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
157
DATE
Pace
Glassell Street
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
bike lane, school, high pedestrian
activity and CVC 22358.6(a), it is
recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 45 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 69 GlaFleLin.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Lincoln Avenue to North City Limits (Riverdale)
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/21/2026 TIME START: 9:10 TIME STOP: 10:10
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 3098 Glassell St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at Richland Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 X X 2 DAILY TRAFFIC: 22,072 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.64
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 X X 2 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 13 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X X 3
48 X X X 3 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.51 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 47 X X X X 4
46 X X X X X X X 7
45 X X X X 4
44 X X X X X X X X 8 ∧ 85TH %: 44 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 ∧
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 ∧ 50TH %: 39 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X X X X X 7 P
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A 15TH %: 35 mph and CVC 22358.6(a), it is 39 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C recommended to post the speed limit on 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 E AVERAGE SPEED: 40 mph this segment at 45 mph. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 ∨
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 ∨ 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 mph 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 ∨
34 X X X X X X X 7 % IN PACE: 76%
33 X X X X X X 6
32 X X 2 % OVER PACE: 14%
31 X 1
30 X X 2 % UNDER PACE: 11%
29 X 1
28 X 1
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 45
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
184
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
Pace
Glassell Street
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 70 GlaLinNor.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Glassell Street to Batavia Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/16/2026 TIME START: 12:00 TIME STOP: 1:21
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 420 W Grove Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Industrial, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Richland Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 3,095 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.51
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 4 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.39 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 34 mph
43 0
42 X 1 50TH %: 29 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 0
40 X 1 15TH %: 24 mph and CVC 22358.6(a), it is
39 0 recommended to post the speed limit on
38 X X 2 AVERAGE SPEED: 29 mph this segment at 35 mph.
37 0
36 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 mph
35 X X 2
34 X X X X X X X X 8 ∧ % IN PACE: 75%
33 X X X X 4 ∧
32 X X X X X 5 ∧ % OVER PACE: 8%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P
30 X X X X X X X X 8 A % UNDER PACE: 17%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C
28 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
27 X X X X X X 6 ∨
26 X X X X X X X X X X 10 ∨ EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35 25 X X X X X 5 ∨
24 X X X X 4
23 X X X X X 5
22 X X X 3 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X X X 3
20 X X X 3
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
108
DATE
Pace
Grove Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 71 GroGlaBat.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Batavia Street to Main Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/16/2026 TIME START: 1:27 TIME STOP: 3:10
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1110 W Grove Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Industrial, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction, no centerline, signalized intersection at Batavia St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,705 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.30
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 2 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 2.12 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 35 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X 2 50TH %: 29 mph
41 0
40 X X 2 15TH %: 25 mph
39 X X 2
38 X X 2 AVERAGE SPEED: 30 mph
37 X X X 3
36 X X X X X 5 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 mph
35 X X X X X X 6
34 X X 2 % IN PACE: 70%
33 X X X X X 5 ∧
32 X X X X X X 6 ∧ % OVER PACE: 23%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 ∧
30 X X 2 P % UNDER PACE: 7%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A
28 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
27 X X X X X X 6 E
26 X X X X X X X X X X 10 ∨ EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 30 25 X X X X 4 ∨
24 X X X X X X 6 ∨
23 X X 2
22 X 1 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 X 1
19 X X 2 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 X 1
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
105
DATE
Pace
Grove Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed, railroad
crossing, street parking, high accident rate,
multiple driveways and CVC 22358.6(b), it is
recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 30 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 72 GroBatMai.xlsx.xls 8/10/2026
South City Limits to Marmon Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/16/2026 TIME START 2:35 TIME STOP: 3:50
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 447 S Hewes St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Marmon Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:Horizontal Curve, High Accident Rate 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 7,953 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.71
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 15 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.46 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 47 X 1
46 0
45 X 1
44 X X X X 4 85TH %: 41 mph
43 X X X X X 5
42 X X X X X X X 7 50TH %: 37 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X X X X X X X X 10
40 X X X X X X 6 P 15TH %: 33 mph pedestrian crossing, high accident rate, 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A and CVC 22358.6(b), it is recommended 38 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C AVERAGE SPEED: 37 mph to post the speed limit on this segment at 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E 35 mph.
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 mph 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13
34 X X X X X X X X 8 % IN PACE: 76%
33 X X X X X 5
32 X X X X X 5 % OVER PACE: 5%
31 X X X X X X 6
30 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 19%
29 X X 2
28 0
27 X X 2
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35
25 0
24 0
23 X X 2
22 X 1 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
126
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed, park,
Pace
Hewes Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 73 HewSouMar.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Marmon Avenue to Chapman Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/15/2026 TIME START: 2:40 TIME STOP: 3:45
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 218 S Hewes St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Chapman Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 9,311 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.30
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 12 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 2.36 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 47 0
46 X 1
45 X X 2
44 X X 2 85TH %: 38 mph
43 X 1
42 X X 2 50TH %: 36 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X 3
40 X X X 3 ∧ 15TH %: 32 mph and CVC 22358.6(c), it is
39 X X X X 4 ∧ recommended to post the speed limit on
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 ∧ AVERAGE SPEED: 35 mph this segment at 35 mph. 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 A 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 mph 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E % IN PACE: 82%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 ∨
32 X X X X X X X X 8 ∨ % OVER PACE: 9%
31 X X X X X X 6 ∨
30 X X X 3 % UNDER PACE: 8%
29 X X X X 4
28 X 1
27 X 1
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35
25 0
24 X 1
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
119
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
Pace
Hewes Street
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 74 HewMarCha.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Chapman Avenue to Walnut Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/14/2026 TIME START 2:35 TIME STOP: 3:58
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 11648 Hewes St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, signalized intersection at Spring St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 11,442 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 3 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.29 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 0
46 X X 2
45 X X 2
44 X X X X 4 85TH %: 41 mph
43 X X X X X 5
42 X X X X X 5 50TH %: 37 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 15TH %: 31 mph continuity of speed, pedestrian crossing, 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 residential area, and CVC 22358.6(b), it is 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 P AVERAGE SPEED: 36 mph recommended to post the speed limit on 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 mph 35 X X X X X X X X 8 E
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 % IN PACE: 71%
33 X X X X X X X X 8
32 X X X X X X X 7 % OVER PACE: 11%
31 X X X X X 5
30 X X X X X X X X 8 % UNDER PACE: 18%
29 X X X X X 5
28 X X X 3
27 X 1
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35
25 X 1
24 X 1
23 X X 2
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X 1
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 X 1
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 X 1 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
164
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
this segment at 35 mph.

Pace
Hewes Street Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 75 HewChaWal.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Walnut Avenue to Bond Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/13/2026 TIME START: 9:00 TIME STOP: 9:40
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 11341 Hewes St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, signalized intersection at Walnut Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT: Multiple driveways
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 9,554 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.25
53 0
52 0
51 X 1
50 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 1 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X 1
48 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.23 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 47 X X 2
46 X 1
45 0
44 X X X 3 85TH %: 42 mph
43 X 1 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X 9 50TH %: 37 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16
40 X X X X X 5 15TH %: 33 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P
38 X X X X X X X X X 9 A AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph
37 X X X X X X 6 C
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 mph 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18
34 X X X X X X X 7 % IN PACE: 80%
33 X X X X X X X X X 9
32 X X X X X X X X X 9 % OVER PACE: 8%
31 X 1
30 X X X X X 5 % UNDER PACE: 12%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
130
DATE
Pace
Hewes Street
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
being in a residential area, multiple driveways,
on-street parking, and CVC 22358.6(b), it is
recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 35 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 76 HewWalBon.xlsx.xls 7/29/2026
Bond Avenue to Rancho Santiago Boulevard
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/13/2026 TIME START: 11:20 TIME STOP: 12:00 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 11341 Hewes St
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow striped median, signalized intersection at Bond Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 X 1 DAILY TRAFFIC: 7,456 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.64
53 X X 2
52 X X X X X 5
51 X 1
50 X X X X X 5 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 2 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X X X X X 6
48 X X X X 4 ∧ ACCIDENT RATE: 0.23 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 47 X X X X X X X 7 ∧
46 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∧
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 P
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A 85TH %: 48 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 E 50TH %: 43 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X X X X X 7 ∨
40 X X X X X X X X 8 ∨ 15TH %: 37 mph and CVC 22358.6(c), it is 39 X X X X X X X X 8 ∨ recommended to post the speed limit on 38 X X X 3 AVERAGE SPEED: 42 mph this segment at 45 mph. 37 X X X X X X X X 8
36 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 39 - 48 mph
35 X 1
34 X X X X 4 % IN PACE: 66%
33 X X X 3
32 X 1 % OVER PACE: 13%
31 0
30 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 21%
29 X X 2
28 X 1
27 X 1
26 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 45 25 X 1
24 X 1
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
150
DATE
Pace
Hewes Street
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 77 HewBonRan.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
South City Limits to Canyon View Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/23/2026 TIME START 1:45 TIME STOP: 3:08
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 200 S Jamboree Rd
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at Canyon View Ave, bike lanes 60 X X X X X X 6
59 X X X X X X 6
58 X X X X X X X 7 CONDITIONS NOT
57 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 READILY APPARENT:
56 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
55 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 AVERAGE
54 X X X X X X X X 8 P DAILY TRAFFIC: 20,943 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.75 53 X X X X X X X 7 A
52 X X X X X X X X 8 C
51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
50 X X X X X X X X X 9 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 4 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10
48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.14 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 47 X X X X 4
46 X X X X 4
45 X X 2
44 0 85TH %: 57 mph
43 0
42 0 50TH %: 53 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 0
40 0 15TH %: 48 mph and CVC 22358.6(a), it is
39 0 recommended to post the speed limit on
38 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 53 mph this segment at 55 mph.
37 0
36 0 10 MPH PACE: 48 - 57 mph
35 0
34 0 % IN PACE: 77%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 15%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 8%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 55 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 55
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
127
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
Pace
Jamboree Road Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 78 JamSouCan.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Canyon View Avenue to Chapman Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/23/2026 TIME START: 12:00 TIME STOP: 1:36
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: Jamboree Rd
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at Canyon View Ave, bike lanes 60 X X X X X X 6
59 X X X X X X 6
58 X X X X X X 6 CONDITIONS NOT
57 X X X X X X X 7 ∧ READILY APPARENT:
56 X X X X X X X 7 ∧
55 X X X X X X X X X X 10 ∧ AVERAGE
54 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P DAILY TRAFFIC: 16,158 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.54 53 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
52 X X X X X X X 7 C
51 X X X X X X X X 8 E
50 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨ ACCIDENT HISTORY: 3 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X X X X X X X 8 ∨
48 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨ ACCIDENT RATE: 0.19 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.87 acc/mvm 47 X X X 3
46 X X X 3
45 X X X X 4
44 0 85TH %: 58 mph
43 0
42 0 50TH %: 53 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 0
40 0 15TH %: 48 mph and CVC 22358.6(c), it is
39 0 recommended to post the speed limit on
38 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 53 mph this segment at 55 mph.
37 0
36 0 10 MPH PACE: 48 - 57 mph
35 0
34 0 % IN PACE: 75%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 16%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 9%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 55 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 55
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
114
DATE
Pace
Jamboree Road
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 79 JamCanCha.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Chapman Avenue to Santiago Canyon Road
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/22/2026 TIME START: 9:00 TIME STOP: 10:25
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: County Rte S25
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at Santiago Canyon Road 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 19,862 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.23
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 X X 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 X X 2
46 X X X X X 5
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∧
44 X X X X X X X X 8 ∧ 85TH %: 45 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 ∧
42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P 50TH %: 40 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C 15TH %: 37 mph and CVC 22358.6(b), it is 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E recommended to post the speed limit on 38 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 ∨ AVERAGE SPEED: 41 mph this segment at 40 mph. 37 X X X X X X X X 8 ∨
36 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨ 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 mph
35 X X X X X X 6
34 X 1 % IN PACE: 86%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 8%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 6%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
116
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
Pace
Jamboree Road
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 80 JamChaSan.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
West City Lmits to Main Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/13/2026 TIME START: 11:55 TIME STOP: 12:30 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2192 W Katella Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Commercial, no on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at Struck Ave 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 22,220 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.51
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 2 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.10 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 X 1
46 X 1
45 X X 2
44 X X X X X 5 85TH %: 41 mph
43 X X X X X 5
42 X X X X X X 6 50TH %: 36 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X X X X X X 8
40 X X X X X X X 7 15TH %: 30 mph and CVC 22358.6(a), it is 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 ∧ recommended to post the speed limit on 38 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 ∧ AVERAGE SPEED: 36 mph this segment at 40 mph. 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∧
36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C % IN PACE: 64%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
32 X X X X X X X 9 ∨ % OVER PACE: 22%
31 X X X X X X X X 8 ∨
30 X X X X X X X X 8 ∨ % UNDER PACE: 13%
29 X X X X X X 10
28 X X X X X 4
27 X X X 5
26 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40 25 X X 1
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
163
DATE
Pace
Katella Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 81 KatWesMai.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Main Street to Batavia Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/13/2026 TIME START: 11:15 TIME STOP: 11:45 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1145 W Katella Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Commercial, no on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, signalized intersection at Batavia St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 31,114 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.28
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 9 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.57 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 0
46 X 1
45 X 1
44 X X X X 4 85TH %: 41 mph
43 X X X 3
42 X X X X 4 50TH %: 36 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 ∧ Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
40 X X X X X X X X 8 ∧ 15TH %: 30 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 ∧ and CVC 22358.6(a), it is
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 P AVERAGE SPEED: 36 mph recommended to post the speed limit on 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 A this segment at 40 mph. 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 mph 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 ∨ % IN PACE: 70%
33 X X X X X X X X 8 ∨
32 X X X X X X X X 8 ∨ % OVER PACE: 9%
31 X X X X X X X X 8
30 X X X X X X X 7 % UNDER PACE: 21%
29 X X X X 4
28 X X X X X 5
27 X X X X 4
26 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40 25 X X 2
24 X 1
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
150
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
Pace
Katella Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 82 KatMaiBat.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Batavia Street to Glassell Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/13/2026 TIME START: 10:30 TIME STOP: 11:05 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 524 W Katella Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Commercial, no on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at Xtra 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 32,519 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.53
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 9 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.29 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 X X 2
46 X X X 3
45 X X X X X X X 7
44 X X X X X X 6 85TH %: 42 mph
43 X X X X 4
42 X X X X X X X 7 ∧ 50TH %: 36 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X X X X X 7 ∧
40 X X X X X X X X 8 ∧ 15TH %: 30 mph and CVC 22358.6(a), it is 39 X X X X X X X 7 P recommended to post the speed limit on 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A AVERAGE SPEED: 36 mph this segment at 40 mph. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C
36 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 ∨
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 ∨ % IN PACE: 60%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 ∨
32 X X X X X X X 7 % OVER PACE: 15%
31 X X X X X X 6
30 X X X X X X X X 8 % UNDER PACE: 25%
29 X X X X X X X 7
28 X X X X X X 6
27 X X X X 4
26 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40 25 X 1
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
164
DATE
Pace
Katella Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 83 KatBatGla.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Glassell Street to Cambridge Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/13/2026 TIME START 9:45 TIME STOP: 10:20
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 636 E Katella Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Commercial, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, signalized intersection at Xtra 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:Continuity of Speed
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 31,767 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.49
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 28 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X X 3
48 X X X X X X 6 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.98 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 X X X X X X X 7
46 X X X X X X X X X 9
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
44 X X X X X X X 7 85TH %: 46 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A 50TH %: 40 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X X X X X X 8 C
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E 15TH %: 34 mph on-street parking, multiple driveways, 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 continuity of speed, and CVC 22358.6(b), 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 AVERAGE SPEED: 40 mph it is recommended to post the speed limit 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10
36 X X X X X X X X 8 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 mph
35 X X X X X X 6
34 X X X X X X X X 8 % IN PACE: 65%
33 X X X X 4
32 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 10%
31 X X X 3
30 X X X 3 % UNDER PACE: 25%
29 X 1
28 X X 2
27 X 1
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 X 1
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
165
DATE
Pace
Katella Avenue Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
on this segment at 40 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 84 KatGlaCam.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Cambridge Street to Tustin Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/13/2026 TIME START: 9:00 TIME STOP: 9:40
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1437 E Katella Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Commercial, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, two-way left-turn median, signalized intersection at Xtra 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 33,444 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 26 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X 1
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.85 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 X 1
46 X X 2
45 X X 2
44 X X X X X X X X 8 ∧ 85TH %: 43 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∧
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 ∧ 50TH %: 39 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A 15TH %: 33 mph and CVC 22358.6(c), it is 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C recommended to post the speed limit on 38 X X X X X X X X X 9 E AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph this segment at 40 mph. 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨
36 X X X X X X X X X X 10 ∨ 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 mph
35 X X X X X X X X 8 ∨
34 X X X X X X 6 % IN PACE: 74%
33 X X X X X X X X 8
32 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 5%
31 X X X X 4
30 X X 2 % UNDER PACE: 21%
29 X 1
28 X 1
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 X 1
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
128
DATE
Pace
Katella Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 85 KatCamTus.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Tustin Street to Sacramento Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/21/2026 TIME START: 9:14 TIME STOP: 9:36
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1920 E Katella Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Commercial, no on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at Tustin St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 44,486 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.34
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 29 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.05 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 X 1
44 X X 2 85TH %: 37 mph
43 X X 2 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 33 mph
41 X X 2
40 X X 2 15TH %: 29 mph
39 X X 2
38 X X X X 4 AVERAGE SPEED: 33 mph
37 X X X X X X 6 ∧
36 X X X X X X X X 8 ∧ 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 mph
35 X X X X 4 ∧
34 X X X X X X X 7 P % IN PACE: 78%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 A
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C % OVER PACE: 15%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
30 X X X X X X 6 ∨ % UNDER PACE: 7%
29 X X X X X 5 ∨
28 X X X X X X 6 ∨
27 X X X X 4
26 X X X X 4 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35 25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
107
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
and CVC 22358.6(a), it is
recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 35 mph.

Pace
Katella Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 86 KatTusSac.xlsx.xls 8/7/2026
Sacramento Street to Handy Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/14/2026 TIME START: 9:00 TIME STOP: 10:02
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2261 E Katella Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at Handy St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:High Accident Rate, Continuity of Speed 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 37,625 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.17
53 0
52 X 1
51 0
50 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 18 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X 1
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.51 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 X X X 3
46 X 1
45 X X X 3
44 X X 2 85TH %: 42 mph
43 X X X 3 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X 2 50TH %: 36 mph
41 X X X X 4
40 X X X X X 5 ∧ 15TH %: 29 mph
39 X X X X X 5 ∧
38 X X X X X 5 ∧ AVERAGE SPEED: 36 mph
37 X X X X X X 6 P
36 X X X X X X X X X 9 A 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 mph
35 X X X X X X 6 C
34 X X X X X X X X 8 E % IN PACE: 59%
33 X X X X X 5 ∨
32 X X X X X 5 ∨ % OVER PACE: 21%
31 X X X X X X 6 ∨
30 X X X X 4 % UNDER PACE: 20%
29 X X X X X 5
28 X X X X 4
27 X X X 3
26 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35 25 X 1
24 X 1
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
101
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
high accident rate, continuity of speed,
and CVC 22358.6(b), it is
recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 35 mph.

Pace
Katella Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 87 KatSacHan.xlsx.xls 8/7/2026
Handy Street to East City Limits
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/14/2026 TIME START: 10:10 TIME STOP: 10:55 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2836 E Katella Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Residential, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, raised median, signalized intersection at Handy St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 33,584 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.29
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 10 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X 1
48 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.56 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 0
46 X X 2
45 X X X 3
44 X X X X 4 85TH %: 43 mph
43 X X X X X 5
42 X X X X X 5 ∧ 50TH %: 37 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X 3 ∧
40 X X X X X X 6 ∧ 15TH %: 31 mph and CVC 22358.6(c), it is 39 X X X X X X X 7 P recommended to post the speed limit on 38 X X X X X X X X 8 A AVERAGE SPEED: 37 mph this segment at 40 mph. 37 X X X X X X X 7 C
36 X X X X X X 6 E 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 mph
35 X X X X X X 6 ∨
34 X X X X X X X 7 ∨ % IN PACE: 61%
33 X X X X X X X 7 ∨
32 X X 2 % OVER PACE: 17%
31 X X X X X X 6
30 X X X X 4 % UNDER PACE: 22%
29 X X X X X 5
28 X X 2
27 X 1
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 X 1
23 X 1
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
101
DATE
Pace
Katella Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 88 KatHanEas.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
West City Limits to Main Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/22/2026 TIME START: 10:45 TIME STOP: 12:00 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1521 W La Veta Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Commercial, no on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow striped centerline, signalized intersection at Bedford Rd 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:Vertical Curve, Continuity of Speed 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 21,342 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.55
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 28 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.31 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 47 0
46 X X X X 4
45 X X 2
44 X X X X X X 6 ∧ 85TH %: 43 mph
43 X X X X X X 6 ∧ Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X 6 ∧ 50TH %: 38 mph
41 X X X X X 5 P
40 X X X X X X X X 8 A 15TH %: 33 mph
39 X X X X X X X X 8 C
38 X X X X X X X X 8 E AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨
36 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨ 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 mph
35 X X X X X 5 ∨
34 X X X X 4 % IN PACE: 70%
33 X X X X X X X 7
32 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 7%
31 X X X X 4
30 X X 2 % UNDER PACE: 23%
29 X X 2
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
100
DATE
Pace
La Veta Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed, street
parking, multiple driveways, vertical curve,
continuity of speed, and CVC 22358.6(c), it is
recommended to post the speed limit on
this segment at 40 mph.

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 89 LavWesMai.xlsx.xls 8/7/2026
Main Street to Batavia Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/22/2026 TIME START: 12:25 TIME STOP: 1:39
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1105 W La Veta Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION:Commercial, no on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction, double yellow striped centerline, signalized intersection at Pepper St 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 27,546 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.32
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 7 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.43 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 36 mph
43 0
42 X 1 50TH %: 30 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X 1
40 0 15TH %: 26 mph and CVC 22358.6(a), it is
39 X X X X 4 recommended to post the speed limit on
38 X X 2 AVERAGE SPEED: 30 mph this segment at 35 mph.
37 X X X 3
36 X X X X X X 6 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 mph
35 X X X X X X 6 ∧
34 X X X X X 5 ∧ % IN PACE: 68%
33 X X X X X X X 7 ∧
32 X X X X X 5 P % OVER PACE: 17%
31 X X X X X X X X 8 A
30 X X X X 4 C % UNDER PACE: 15%
29 X X X X X 5 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X 10 ∨
27 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 ∨
26 X X X X X X X 7 ∨ EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35 25 X X X X 4
24 X X X X 4
23 X X X 3
22 X X X 3 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X 1
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
100
DATE
Pace
La Veta Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 90 LavMaiBat.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Batavia Street to Glassell Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/21/2026 TIME START: 2:00 TIME STOP: 3:30
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 401 W La Veta Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear/Dry
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential, commercial, partial red cub, on-street parking only for the westbound direction 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, railroad crossing east of Pixley Street 60 0 double-double yellow striped centerline, raised median east and west of railroac crosing tracks 59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 14,546 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 11 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.83 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 38 mph
43 0
42 X X X 3 50TH %: 34 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X 2
40 X X X X X X X X 8 15TH %: 30 mph and CVC 22358.6(c), it is 39 X X X X X X 6 recommended to post the speed limit on 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 ∧ AVERAGE SPEED: 34 mph this segment at 35 mph. 37 X X X X 4 ∧
36 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∧ 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 mph
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 A % IN PACE: 80%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 C
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E % OVER PACE: 14%
31 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 ∨ % UNDER PACE: 7%
29 X X X X X X X X 8 ∨
28 X X X X X 5
27 X X X 3
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35
25 0
24 0
23 X 1
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
138
DATE
Pace
La Veta Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 91 LavBatGla.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Glassell Street to Shaffer Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/22/2026 TIME START: 12:45 TIME STOP: 2:00
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 333 E La Veta Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear/Dry
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction, yellow centerline, all-way stop-control at Shaffer Street 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT: High Accident Rate, Narrow Road
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 9,606 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.25
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 8 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.83 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 32 mph
43 0 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 0 50TH %: 29 mph
41 0 residential area, street parking, narrow road, high 40 0 15TH %: 26 mph accident rate, and CVC 22358.6(b), it is 39 0 recommended to post the speed limit on this
38 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 29 mph segment at 25 mph.
37 0
36 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 mph
35 X X X 3
34 X X X X X X X 7 ∧ % IN PACE: 90%
33 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∧
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 ∧ % OVER PACE: 3%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 A % UNDER PACE: 7% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 ∨
26 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨ EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 25 25 X X X X X X X X 8 ∨
24 X X X X X 5
23 X X X 3
22 X 1 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 X 1
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
137
DATE
Pace
La Veta Street
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 92 LavGlaSha.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Batavia Street to Glassell Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/22/2026 TIME START: 2:15 TIME STOP: 3:30
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 718 E La Veta Ave
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear/Dry
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential, on-street parking
63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lanes each direction, yellow centerline, all-way stop-control at Shaffer Street 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 5,937 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.25
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 5 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.85 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 34 mph
43 0
42 0 50TH %: 31 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 0
40 X 1 15TH %: 28 mph and CVC 22358.6(c), it is
39 X 1 recommended to post the speed limit on
38 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 mph this segment at 30 mph.
37 X 1
36 X X 2 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 mph
35 X X X X X X X X 8 ∧
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 ∧ % IN PACE: 95%
33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 ∧
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 P % OVER PACE: 4% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 C % UNDER PACE: 2% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 ∨
27 X X X X X X X X 8 ∨
26 X X X X 4 ∨ EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 30 25 X 1
24 X 1
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
128
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
Pace
La Veta Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 93 LavShaCam.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Tustin Street to Yorba Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/28/2026 TIME START: 11:25 TIME STOP: 12:12 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2129 E La Veta Avenue
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear/Dry
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential, commercial, freeway overpass, partial red cub, on-street parking on north side west of 63 0 Frontage Road and on south side east of freeway overpass 62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, two-way left turn lane with left turn pocket west of Fairmont Way, 60 0 double-double yellow striped median on overpass, double yellow centerline with left turn pocket east of 59 0 Fairmont Avenue
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT: Continuity of Speed, Horizontal Curve, Vertical Curve 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 8,637 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.52
53 0
52 0
51 X X X 3
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 2 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X 2
48 X X X 3 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.25 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 X X X X X X X 7
46 X X X X X 5
45 X 1
44 X X X X X 5 85TH %: 46 mph
43 X X X X X X 6
42 X X X X X 5 50TH %: 39 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X X X X 6 P
40 X X X X X X X 7 A 15TH %: 36 mph of speed, horizontal/vertical curvature, on-street 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C parking, and CVC 22358.6(b), it is recommended 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E AVERAGE SPEED: 40 mph to post the speed limit on this segment at 40 mph. 37 X X X X 4
36 X X X X X X X 7 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 mph
35 X X X X X 5
34 X X 2 % IN PACE: 70%
33 X X 2
32 X X X 3 % OVER PACE: 19%
31 X 1
30 X X 2 % UNDER PACE: 10%
29 X 1
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
108
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed, continuity
Pace
La Veta Avenue Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 94 VetTusYor.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Yorba Street to Chipwood Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/23/2026 TIME START: 11:23 TIME STOP: 15:15 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 3123 E La Veta Avenue
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear/Dry
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential, school (La Veta Elementary School), park (La Veta Park), partial red curb near school zone, 63 0 on-street parking
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, school crossing with flashing beacon at Malena Drive, 60 0 pedestrian crossing at Woodland Street, all-way stop at Prospect Street 59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT: Continuity of Speed, High Accident Rate 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 7,016 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.86
53 0
52 0
51 X 1
50 X X X 3 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 14 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 X X X 3
48 X X X X 4 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.27 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 47 X X X X 4
46 X X X X X X X 7
45 X X X 3
44 X X X X X 5 85TH %: 46 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X 9 Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 50TH %: 40 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P of speed, no left turn pockets, uncontrolled 40 X X X X X X X X 8 A 15TH %: 36 mph pedestrian crossing, school area, high accident 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C rate, and CVC 22358.7(a)(2), it is recommended 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E AVERAGE SPEED: 40 mph to post the speed limit on this segment 37 X X X X X X 6 at 35 mph.
36 X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 mph
35 X X X X X 5
34 X X X X X 5 % IN PACE: 72%
33 X X 2
32 X X 2 % OVER PACE: 19%
31 X X 2
30 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 9%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 35
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
131
DATE

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed, continuity
Pace
La Veta Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 95 VetYorChi.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Chipwood Street and Esplanade Street
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/22/2026 TIME START: 9:00 TIME STOP: 11:00
72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 3924 E La Veta Avenue
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear/Dry
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction, eastbound incline grade, two-way left turn lane 60 0
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 4,526 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.14
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 3 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 2.57 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 47 0
46 0
45 0
44 0 85TH %: 32 mph
43 0
42 0 50TH %: 29 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 0
40 0 15TH %: 25 mph and CVC 22358.6(a), it is
39 0 recommended to post the speed limit on
38 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 28 mph this segment at 30 mph.
37 0
36 0 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 mph
35 X X 2
34 X X X X 4 ∧ % IN PACE: 86%
33 X X 2 ∧
32 X X X X X X X X 8 ∧ % OVER PACE: 2%
31 X X X X X X 6 P
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 A % UNDER PACE: 12%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
28 X X X X X X 6 E
27 X X X X X 5 ∨
26 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 ∨ EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 30 25 X X X X X X 6 ∨
24 X X 2
23 X X 2
22 X X X 3 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 X 1
19 X 1 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 X 1
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
84 DATE
Pace
La Veta Street
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 96 VetChiEsp.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
South City Limits to Metropolitan/Lampson Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/22/2026 TIME START: 12:00 TIME STOP: 12:30 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: Lewis Street
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear/Dry
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential, freeway overpass, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, two-way left turn lane north of Lewis Street, double-double yellow striped median 60 0 south of Lewis Street, left turn pockets
59 0
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT: Horizontal Curve, Vertical Curve, Continuity of Speed 56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 13,695 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.52
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 7 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 X X X 3 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.54 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 X X X X 4
46 X X X X X X 6
45 X X X X 4 ∧
44 X X X X 4 ∧ 85TH %: 45 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 ∧
42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P 50TH %: 40 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X X X X 6 A
40 X X X X X X X 7 C 15TH %: 35 mph and CVC 22358.6(b), it is 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E recommended to post the speed limit on 38 X X X X X X X 7 ∨ AVERAGE SPEED: 40 mph this segment at 40 mph. 37 X X X X 4 ∨
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 ∨ 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 mph 35 X X X 3
34 X X X X 4 % IN PACE: 72%
33 X 1
32 X X X 3 % OVER PACE: 13%
31 X X X 3
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 16%
29 0
28 0
27 X 1
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 X 1
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
103
DATE
Pace
Lewis Street
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF ORANGE ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
Based on the 85th percentile speed,
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 97 LewSouMet.xlsx.xls 8/11/2026
Metroplitan/Lampson Avenue to Chapman Avenue
75 0
74 0
73 0 DATE: 4/13/2026 TIME START: 10:28 TIME STOP: 11:44 72 0
71 0
70 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 12317 S Lewis Street
69 0
68 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
67 0
66 0 WEATHER: Clear/Dry
65 0
64 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Buisness/office, residential, chuch (Christ Cathedral), commercial, no on-street parking 63 0
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction, two-way left turn lane north of Dawn Avenue, double-double yellow striped median 60 0 between Dawn Avenue and Greentree Avenue, double yellow centerline south of Greentree Avenue, 59 0 left turn pockets south of Greentree Avenue
58 0 CONDITIONS NOT
57 0 READILY APPARENT:
56 0
55 0 AVERAGE
54 0 DAILY TRAFFIC: 16,317 SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50
53 0
52 0
51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 17 midblock collisions in 5 years (1/1/2021 TO 12/31/2025) 49 0
48 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.15 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 47 X 1
46 X X X 3
45 X X X X X 5 ∧
44 X X X X X X X 7 ∧ 85TH %: 43 mph
43 X X X X X X X X 8 ∧
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P 50TH %: 40 mph Justification for Proposed Speed Limit:
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 A
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 C 15TH %: 37 mph and CVC 22358.6(c), it is 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E recommended to post the speed limit on 38 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 ∨ AVERAGE SPEED: 40 mph this segment at 40 mph. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 ∨
36 X X X X X X X X X 9 ∨ 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 mph
35 X X X X 4
34 0 % IN PACE: 93%
33 0
32 0 % OVER PACE: 3%
31 0
30 0 % UNDER PACE: 3%
29 0
28 0
27 0
26 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 40
25 0
24 0
23 0
22 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
21 0
20 0
19 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
18 0
17 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 16 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA. 15 0
116
DATE