January 04, 2022~4:00 PM Oroville City Council Meeting Agenda Page 1 of 6
OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers
1735 Montgomery Street
Oroville, CA. 95965
January 04, 2022
REGULAR MEETING
CLOSED SESSION 4:00 PM
OPEN SESSION 4:30 PM
AGENDA
COVID-19 PUBLIC ACCESS AND PARTICIPATION
To view the meeting, attend the meeting or provide comment, please see the options below.
To View the Meeting:
1. Watch our live feed https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAoRW34swYl85UBfYqT7IbQ/
2. Watch via Zoom
https://zoom.us/j/96870319529?pwd=dW9kMGRZSFo5MFFNQk5wVDUzRkRrZz09 Meeting ID: 968 7031 9529
Passcode: 67684553
3. Listen by telephone (audio only):
Telephone: 1-669-900-6833
Meeting ID: 968 7031 9529
Passcode: 67684553
To Provide Comment to the Council:
1. Email before the meeting by 2:00 PM your comments to [email protected]
2. Attend the meeting in person.
If you would like to address the Council at this meeting, you are requested to complete the blue speaker request form (located on the wall by the agendas) and hand it to the City Clerk, who is seated on the right of the Council Chamber. The form assists the Clerk with minute taking and assists the Mayor or presiding chair in conducting an orderly meeting. Providing personal information on the form is voluntary. For scheduled agenda items, please submit the form prior to the conclusion of the staff presentation for that item. Council has established time limitations of two (2) minutes per speaker on all items and an overall time limit of thirty minutes for non-agenda items.
If more than 10 speaker cards are submitted for non-agenda items, the time limitation would be reduced to one and a half minutes per speaker. If more than 15 speaker cards are submitted for non-agenda items, the first 15 speakers will be randomly selected to speak at the beginning of the meeting, with the remaining speakers given an opportunity at the end. (California Government Code §54954.3(b)).
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, the Council is prohibited from taking action except for a brief response from the Council or staff to statements or questions relating to a non-agenda item.
CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
Council Members: David Pittman, Eric Smith, Krysi Riggs, Art Hatley, Janet Goodson, Vice Mayor Scott Thomson, Mayor Chuck Reynolds
1 January 04, 2022~4:00 PM Oroville City Council Meeting Agenda Page 2 of 6
CLOSED SESSION
The Council will hold a Closed Session on the following:
1. Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.95, the City will meet with Scott E. Huber, City Attorney, concerning the workers’ compensation case – Amanda Wilkey v. City of Oroville, Claim no. NCWA-558137.
2. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b), the Council will meet with City Administrator, Personnel Officer, and/or City Attorney to consider the public employment related to the following position: Police Chief.
3. Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(2), the Council will meet with the City Administrator and City Attorney regarding potential exposure to litigation – Two cases.
OPEN SESSION
1. Announcement from Closed Session
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Adoption of Agenda
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION – HEARING OF NON-AGENDA ITEMS
This is the time to address the Council about any item not listed on the agenda. If you wish to address the Council on an item listed on the agenda, please follow the directions listed above.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent calendar items 1 - 8 are adopted in one action by the Council. Items that are removed will be discussed and voted on immediately after adoption of consent calendar items.
1. INVESTMENT POLICY ADOPTION FOR 2022
The Council will consider adopting the Statement of Investment Policy 2022 for the City of Oroville
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 9009 - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ADOPTION OF AN INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE CITY OF OROVILLE FOR 2022.
2. MEETING CALENDAR FOR 2022
The City Council may consider adopting the City Meeting Calendar for 2022.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the City’s Meeting Calendar for 2022.
2 January 04, 2022~4:00 PM Oroville City Council Meeting Agenda Page 3 of 6
3. MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE
State of California received a minimum wage increase on January 1, 2022, from $14.00 per hour to $15.00 per hour. Also, adding the new Recycling Coordinator position to the master salary schedule.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Approve the Master Salary Schedule to include the Recycling Coordinator position and an increase to minimum wage for two positions.
4. HOUSING PROGRAM FUND LOAN FOR PROSPECT VIEW APARTMENTS Council will consider approving a Housing Program Fund loan to AMG & Associates for the development of Prospect View Apartments located at 135 Nelson Ave., Oroville CA.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 9012 – A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE SECURITY DOCUMENTS
ASSOCIATED WITH THE HOUSING PROGRAM FUND LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,000,000 WITH AMG & ASSOCIATES FOR PROSPECT VIEW APARTMENTS.
5. EXTENSION AND ADDITION TO THE EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT (ENA)
WITH VETERANS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (VHDC)
Council may consider extending the ENA with VHDC until January 31, 2023 to develop affordable housing for veterans and their families.
Additionally, Council may consider the transfer a newly developed 3.91-acre parcel located behind the City’s corporation yard to develop affordable, multi-family, permanent supportive housing for veterans and their families.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 9013 – A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXTEND THE
EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF OROVILLE AND VETERANS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION UNTIL JANUARY 31, 2023.
Adopt Resolution No. 9014 – A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO TRANSFER THE NEWLY CREATED PARCEL LOCATED ON MITCHELL AVE. TO THE VETERANS HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO EXTREMELY-LOW AND VERY-LOW INCOME VETERANS AND THEIR FAMILIES. 3 January 04, 2022~4:00 PM Oroville City Council Meeting Agenda Page 4 of 6
6. COMMUNITY MEMBER APPOINTMENTS TO VARIOUS COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES The City Council may appoint community members to serve on the Citizens Oversight Committee, Planning Commission, Arts Commission, Parks Commission, and Housing Loan Advisory Committee to fill current vacancies.
RECOMMENDATION
Appoint Sherrie French to the Citizens Oversight Committee with terms expiring June 30, 2025; and appoint Christopher Logue as Member and Cheri Moore as Alternate to the Housing Loan Advisory Committee with terms expiring June 30, 2024; and appoint Warren Jensen to the Planning Commission with term expiring June 30, 2026; and appoint Michael Grant Jones and Mickey Rich to the Parks Commission with terms expiring of June 30, 2026; and appoint Jennifer Beers and Misty Rayome to the Arts Commission with terms expiring June 30, 2025.
7. PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY INTO THE CITY’S ASSESSMENT
DISTRICTS
The City previously formed several maintenance districts to serve as a funding source to pay for the maintenance and servicing of certain improvements within certain residential housing tracts located throughout the City. The Consolidated Landscape and Lighting Maintenance assessment District (the “LLMAD”) funds landscape and lighting improvements; the Consolidated Benefit Assessment District (the “BAD”) that funds drainage and storm water improvements and related services. The City also manages Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 and Community Facilities District No. 2006-2 (the CFD’s”). Those Districts provide fire, police and emergency services facilities and services, respectively. The Council will consider annexing the Village at Ruddy Creek development into these assessment districts.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Adopt Resolution No.-9015, Resolution of Initiating Proceedings for the Annexation of Territory into the Consolidated Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
2. Adopt Resolution No.9016, Resolution of Initiating Proceedings for the Annexation of Territory into the Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
3. Adopt Resolution No.9017, Resolution Declaring Intention to Annex Territory into the Consolidated Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
4. Adopt Resolution No.9018, Resolution Declaring Intention to Annex Territory into the Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
5. Adopt Resolution No.9019, Resolution Announcing Intent to Annex Territory into Community Facilities District 2006-1 and Community Facilities District 2006-2 4 January 04, 2022~4:00 PM Oroville City Council Meeting Agenda Page 5 of 6
8. AMENDMENT TO GROUND LEASE AGREEMENT WITH ROBERT M. TAYLOR
CORPORATION ESTABLISHING RENT FOR THE FIRST OPTION PERIOD OF THE
GROUND LEASE
The Council will review and consider approving an amendment to a ground lease agreement with the Robert M. Taylor Corporation for first 15-year option period of the ground lease of the property located at the corner of Challenger Avenue and Chuck Yeager Way in Oroville. The proposed lease amendment will bring the ground lease to current market value for rent. In addition, the undeveloped 4.12 acre portion of the ground lease will be returned to the City for future development purposes.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 9008 – A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF OROVILLE AND THE ROBERT M. TAYLOR CORPORATION - (Agreement No. 852-2).
REGULAR BUSINESS
9. HOUSING PROGRAM FUND LOAN FOR VETERAN VILLAGE APARTMENTS Council will consider approving a Housing Program Fund loan to Veteran’s Housing Develop Corporation (VHDC) for the development of Veteran Village Apartments, located on Mitchell Ave.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 9011– A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE SECURITY DOCUMENTS
ASSOCIATED WITH THE HOUSING PROGRAM FUND LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,750,000 WITH VHDC FOR VETERAN VILLAGE APARTMENTS.
10. PARCEL CREATION OF VETERANS HOUSING
The Council may decide to create a parcel that in the future could be developed into housing for veterans.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council adopt Resolution No. 9020 that will create the parcel and easement, that directs staff to continue to work toward developing housing for veterans, and that directs staff to seek Council authorization for any conveyance of said parcel.
11. TASK ORDER WITH NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING TO DRAFT SMALL-LOT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SOUTH OROVILLE AND ENVIRONS UNDER AGREEMENT NO. 3387
The City of Oroville may consider approving a task order from NorthStar Engineering to draft small-lot development standards for South Oroville and other locations.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve a contract with NorthStar Engineering for $12,840 to draft Small-lot development standards for South Oroville and other locations.
5 January 04, 2022~4:00 PM Oroville City Council Meeting Agenda Page 6 of 6
12. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH TROVER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
MANAGEMENT LLC
The City Council may consider a Professional Services Agreement with Trover Construction Project Management LLC to perform owner-occupied rehabilitation contractor services for the City of Oroville Housing Rehabilitation Program in the amount of $130.00 per hour average (not to exceed $165.00 per hour), as needed. Additionally, under this contract, the contractor may be utilized for City maintenance projects as they arise.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 9010 – A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH TROVER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT LLC IN THE AMOUNT OF $130.00 AND HOUR (NOT TO EXCEED $165.00 PER HOUR), TO PROVIDE REHABILITATION PROGRAM AS NEEDED – (Agreement No. 3396-1)
REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS / CORRESPONDENCE
1. Council Announcements and Reports
2. Future Agenda Items
3. Administration Reports
4. Correspondence
i. FERC Correspondence
ADJOURN THE MEETING
The meeting will be adjourned. A regular meeting of the Oroville City Council will be held on January 18, 2022 4:00 p.m.
Accommodating Those Individuals with Special Needs – In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Oroville encourages those with disabilities to participate fully in the public meeting process. If you have a special need in order to allow you to attend or participate in our public meetings, please contact the City Clerk at (530) 538-2535, well in advance of the regular meeting you wish to attend, so that we may make every reasonable effort to accommodate you. Documents distributed for public session items, less than 72 hours prior to meeting, are available for public inspection at City Hall, 1735 Montgomery Street, Oroville, California.
Recordings - All meetings are recorded and broadcast live on cityoforoville.org and YouTube. 6 CITY OF OROVILLE
STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR REYNOLDS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: KAROLYN J. FAIRBANKS, CITY TREASURER
RE: INVESTMENT POLICY ADOPTION FOR 2022
DATE: January 4, 2022
SUMMARY
The Council will consider adopting the Statement of Investment Policy 2022 for the City of Oroville.
DISCUSSION
California Government code states that the Treasurer may annually render to the City legislative body a Statement of Investment Policy for consideration at a public meeting.
The only changes from the 2021 Policy is revision of sections 7.0, 8.0, and 13.0 to provide clarification and compliance with state law.
FISCAL IMPACT
None
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 9009 - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ADOPTION OF AN INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE CITY OF OROVILLE FOR 2022.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 9009
Investment Policy
7 Item 1.
CITY OF OROVILLE
RESOLUTION NO. 9009
A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING THE INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE CITY OF OROVILLE FOR 2022
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Oroville City Council as follows:
a. The Council adopts the Investment Policy for 2022.
b. The City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of the Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Oroville City Council at a regular meeting on January 4, 2022 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
________________________________
CHUCK REYNOLDS, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________________ ________________________________ Scott E. Huber, City Attorney Jackie Glover, Assistant City Clerk 8 Item 1.
City of Oroville
Statement of Investment Policy
2022
Table of Contents
Section Page
1.0 Policy.................................................................................................................... 2
2.0 Scope ................................................................................................................... 2
3.0 Prudence .............................................................................................................. 2
4.0 Objectives............................................................................................................. 2
5.0 Delegation of Authority ......................................................................................... 3
6.0 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest ............................................................................. 3
7.0 Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions....................................................... 3
8.0 Authorized Investments ........................................................................................ 4
9.0 Review of Investment Portfolio .………………………………………………………5
10.0 Investment Pools/Mutual Funds ………………………………………………………5
11.0 Collateralization.................................................................................................... 5
12.0 Safekeeping and Custody .................................................................................... 5
13.0 Diversification ....................................................................................................... 6
14.0 Maximum Maturities ............................................................................................. 6
15.0 Internal Control..................................................................................................... 6
16.0 Performance Standards........................................................................................ 6
17.0 Reporting.............................................................................................................. 6
18.0 Investment Policy Adoption .................................................................................. 7
19.0 Glossary…………………………………………………………………………………..7
City of Oroville
9 Item 1.
Statement of Investment Policy
2022
1.0 Policy: The City of Oroville (the City) shall invest public funds in such manner as to comply with all federal, state and local statutes; insure prudent money management; provide for daily cash flow requirements; and meet the objectives in priority order of safety, liquidity and return on investment.
2.0 Scope: This Investment Policy covers all financial assets under the direct authority of the City. In addition, funds held by trustees or fiscal agents are excluded from these rules; however, all funds are subject to regulations established by the state of California. The covered funds, and any new funds created by the City, unless specifically exempted by this policy, are defined in the City’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
3.0 Prudence: The standard of prudence to be used shall be the prudent investor standard and shall be applied in the context of managing the overall portfolio. Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived.
3.1 Any investment official exercising his or her assigned authority with due diligence and prudence in accordance with the written procedures and the Investment Policy will not be held personally liable for any individual investment losses or for total portfolio losses provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments.
4.0 Objectives: The primary objectives of investment activities in order of priority shall be:
4.1 Safety: Safety of principal is the prime objective of the investment program. Investments of the City shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio.
4.2 Liquidity: The City’s investment portfolio shall be structured in a manner which strives to time the maturity of securities with cash requirements to remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements which might be reasonably anticipated.
4.3 Return on Investments: The City shall attempt to obtain a reasonable return after basic requirements of safety and liquidity have been met. 10 Item 1.
3 5.0 Delegation of Authority: Authority to manage the investment program is derived from the City Charter, City Code and the Government Code of the State of California. Management responsibility for the investment program is hereby delegated to the Treasurer who shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken and shall establish a system of controls and procedures. The City Council shall appoint someone to act only in the absence of the Treasurer. The Treasurer has the authority to sign all contracts related to the investment of public funds.
5.1 Investment Procedures: The Treasurer shall establish written procedures for the operation of the investment program consistent with this investment policy. The procedures should include reference to safekeeping, repurchase agreements, wire transfer agreements, banking service contracts and collateral/depository agreements. Such procedures shall include explicit delegation of authority to persons responsible for investment transactions. No person may engage in an investment transaction except as provided under the terms of this policy and the procedures established by the Treasurer and approved by the legislative body.
6.0 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest: Officers, employees, elected and appointed officials involved in the investment process shall act responsibly as custodians of the public trust; avoid any transaction that might impair the public confidence or the City’s ability to serve the citizens; refrain from personal business activities that could conflict with proper execution of the investment program or could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions and abide by the City’s adopted Conflict of Interest Code incorporated by reference into this Investment Policy.
7.0 Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions: To promote the optimum yield on the investment of City funds, investment procedures shall be designed to encourage competitive bidding on transactions from approved financial institutions and broker-dealers. Dealers and Institutions are defined in California Code as a member of a federally regulated securities exchange, a national or state-chartered bank, a savings association or federal association or a brokerage firm designated as a primary government dealer by the Federal Reserve Bank.
7.1 All financial institutions and broker/dealers who desire to become qualified for investment transactions must supply the following :
audited financial statements demonstrating compliance with state and federal capital adequacy guidelines. proof of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) registration, proof of State of California registration and certification of having read the City’s 11 Item 1.
4 0investment policy.
.8.0 Authorized Investments: The Treasurer may invest city funds in the following instruments as specified under Section 53601 et seq., of the California Government Code, as now read or hereafter amended, and as further limited in this policy. In the case of bond proceeds permissible investments are limited to those specified in the bond documents in accordance with Section 5922 of the Government Code or other applicable laws. Investments in Deferred Compensation funds are limited to those investments allowed under Section 53609 of the Government Code.
8.1 Except as provided above, the following investments are authorized, as further limited herein:
8.1.1 Obligations of the U.S. Government – Maximum 100%
8.1.2 Time Certificates of Deposits - Maximum 30%. Deposits should not exceed three year maturity. Deposits will be collateralized or insured in accordance with the investment policy and placed with nationally or state chartered banks, a savings association and/or a state or federal credit
union.
8.1.3 Local government investment pools - Maximum
100%. Investments will be made in accordance with laws
and regulations governing these funds.
8.1.4 Repurchase agreements - Maximum 20%. Must be fully Collateralized at 110%, have a maturity of no more than 90 days, and will only be with primary dealers of the
Federal Reserve Bank who have long term debt rated at
AAA by Moody’s or Standard and Poor.
8.1.5 Passbook Savings Account Demand Deposits - Maximum 50%. Deposits must be insured if under
FDIC limit allowed by law, collateralized if over that
limit, and not exceed $1,000,000 with one institution.
8.1.6 SEC Registered Money Market/Mutual Funds – Maximum 20%. Funds must consist of instruments permitted under
Section 53601 of the Government Code.
8.1.7 Bankers’ Acceptance - Maximum 40% and have a maturity of no longer than 180 days.
8.1.8 Investments held separately. Investment of bond funds will be made in conformance with the trust indenture for each issue. Such funds will be held separately when required.
8.2 If repurchase agreements are legal and authorized by policy, a Master Repurchase Agreement must be signed with the bank or dealer.
12 Item 1.
5 9.0 Review of Investment Portfolio: The securities held by the City must be in compliance with Section 8.0 Authorized and Suitable Investments at the time of purchase. To assure subsequent compliance, the Treasurer shall at least quarterly review the portfolio to identify any securities that do not comply and establish procedures to report to the City critical incidents of noncompliance.
10.0 Investment Pools/Mutual Funds: Governmental sponsored pools and/or mutual funds should be carefully reviewed prior to investing and should be monitored on an ongoing basis. Requisite information on the pool includes a statement of investment policy and objectives, a description of interest calculations and how it is distributed and how gains and losses are treated, a description of how the securities are safeguarded (including the settlement process) and how often the securities are priced and the program audited, a description of who may invest in the program, a schedule for receiving statements and portfolio listings, a description of how the pool/fund maintains reserves, earnings, etc. or is all income after expenses distributed to participants, and a fee schedule.
11.0 Collateralization: Investments in time certificates of deposit shall be fully insured up to the maximum allowed by law by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund, or the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, as appropriate.
Investments in time certificates of deposit in excess of the maximum amount allowed by law shall be properly collateralized. Section 53652 of the California Government Code requires that the depository pledge securities with market value of at least 10% in excess of the City’s deposit as collateral in government securities. The City Treasurer is responsible for entering into deposit contracts with each depository. Collateral for investments in Repurchase agreements must consist of U. S. Treasury obligations or U. S. Agency obligations. In order to anticipate market changes and provide a level of security for all funds, the collateralization level will be 110% of market value of principal and accrued interest.
12.0 Safekeeping and Custody: All security transactions, including collateral for repurchase agreements shall be conducted on a delivery versus payment (DVP) basis. Securities will be held by a third party custodian, or in the case of bond proceeds the Trustee, designated by the Treasurer and evidenced by safekeeping receipts. The only exception to the foregoing shall be depository accounts and securities purchases made with LAIF, time certificates of deposit and money market mutual funds, since the purchased securities are not deliverable.
13.0 Diversification: The purpose of diversification is to reduce the overall 13 Item 1.
6 portfolio risks while attaining market average rates of return. The maximum allowable percentage of investments in any one category will be diversified as required by law, or as provided by this policy, whichever is lower. In addition, with the exception of U.S. Treasury securities and the Local Agency Investment Fund, no more than 50% of the total portfolio will be vested in a single security type or with a single financial institution (excluding demand deposits and bond proceeds if allowed by the bond trustee).
14.0 Maximum Maturities: No investment shall be made with a maturity of more than three (3) years unless the Governing Body specifically authorizes the investment. As a general rule the City will not invest in securities maturing more than two (2) years from date of purchase unless they represent reserve funds or other monies set aside to satisfy long term needs such as capital accumulation funds. To the extent possible, investment maturities will be matched against anticipated cash flow requirements.
15.0 Internal Control: The City shall establish an annual process of independent review by the external auditor. This review will provide internal control by assuring compliance with policies and procedures.
16.0 Performance Standards: The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of obtaining a rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles commensurate with the investment risk constraints and the cash flow needs. The basis used by the Treasurer to determine whether market yields are being achieved shall be to identify a comparable benchmark to the portfolio investment duration.
17.0 Reporting: The Treasurer shall provide a monthly report to the City Council regarding investment activity and returns on all portfolios which provide a clear picture of the status of the current investment portfolio.
The report shall include: Type of investment, issuer, purchase date, date of maturity, amount of deposit or cost of the investment, face value of securities, current market value of securities, rate of interest and interest earnings. If any of the funds are managed by a contracted party, a description shall be included in the report. The report shall be reviewed and signed by the Treasurer, the Director of Finance and the City Administrator.
18.0 Investment Policy Adoption: In accordance with Section 53646(a) of the California Government Code, the Treasurer may render annually to the City legislative body a Statement of Investment Policy for consideration at a public meeting. The City’s Investment policy and any modifications shall be adopted by Resolution of the Oroville City Council. 14 Item 1.
7 Any State Law changes during the year are automatically incorporated into this policy.
19.0 Glossary: Because this policy is available to the public as well as the governing body, a glossary of related terminology is a part of the policy.
Glossary
Accrued Interest. Interest earned but not yet received.
Agencies. Federal Agency securities and/or Government-sponsored enterprises.
Arbitrage. Generally, transactions by which securities are bought and sold in different markets at the same time for the sake of the profit arising from a difference in prices in the two markets.
Asked. The price at which securities are offered.
Bankers’ Acceptances (BA’s). A draft or bill of exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill, as well as the issuer.
Basis point. One basis point is one hundredth of one percent (.01).
Benchmark. A comparative base for measuring the performance or risk tolerance of the investment portfolio. A benchmark should represent a close correlation to the level of risk and the average duration of the portfolio’s investments.
Bid. The price offered by a buyer of securities.
Bond. A financial obligation for which the issuer promises to pay the bondholder a specified stream of future cash flows including periodic interest payments and a principal repayment.
Bond Equivalent Yield (BEY). An annual yield, expressed as a percentage, describing the return provided to bond holders. A bond equivalent yield is double the simple interest, semiannual yield.
Book value. The value at which a debt security is shown on the holder’s balance sheet. Book value is the cost less amortization of premium or accretion of a 15 Item 1.
8 discount.
Broker. A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a commission.
Certificate of Deposit (CD). A time deposit of funds in a bank or savings and loan association with a specific maturity evidenced by a certificate.
Collateral. Securities, evidence of deposit or other property, which a borrower pledges for repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposits of public monies.
Commercial Paper. Unsecured short-term promissory notes issued by corporations, with maturities ranging from 2 to 270 days, which may be sold on a discount basis or may bear interest. Firms with lower ratings or without well known names usually back their commercial paper with guarantees or bank letters of credit.
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). The official annual financial report of the City. It includes combined statements and basic financial statements for each individual fund and account group prepared in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
Corporate Medium Term Notes. Unsecured promissory notes issued by corporations operating within the United States. The notes are in the one to five year maturity range.
Coupon. The annual rate of interest that a bond’s issuer promises to pay the bond holder on the bond’s face value. Also, a certificate attached to a bond evidencing interest due on a payment date.
Credit Risk. The risk to an investor that an issuer will default in the payment of interest and/or principal on a security.
Current Yield (Current Return). The interest paid on an investment expressed as a percentage of the current price of the security. Current yield is only accurate for investments purchased at par.
Custody. The service of an organization, usually a financial institution, of holding (and reporting) a customer’s securities for safekeeping. The financial institution is known as the custodian.
Dealer. A dealer, as opposed to a broker, acts as a principal in all transactions, buying and selling for his own account .
Debenture. A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer. 16 Item 1.
9 Delivery versus Payment (DVP). Delivery of securities with a simultaneous exchange of money for the securities.
Derivatives. Financial instruments whose return profile is linked to, or derived from, the movement of one or more underlying index or security, and may include a leveraging factor; or financial contracts based upon noticed amounts whose value is derived from an underlying index or security (interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equities or commodities).
Discount. The difference between the cost price of a security and its maturity when quoted at lower than face value. A security selling below original offering price shortly after sale also is considered to be at a discount.
Discount Securities. Non-interest bearing money market instruments that are issued a discount and redeemed at maturity for full face value, (e.g., U. S. Treasury Bills).
Diversification. Dividing investment funds among a variety of securities, offering independent returns.
Duration. A measure of the sensitivity of the price (the value of principal) of a fixed-income investment to a change in interest rates. Duration is expressed as a number of years. Rising interest rates mean falling bond prices, while declining interest rates mean rising bond prices.
Federal Credit Agencies. Agencies of the Federal government set up to supply credit to various classes of institutions and individuals, e.g. S&L’s, small business firms, students, farmers, farm cooperatives, and exporters.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). A federal agency that insures bank deposits, currently up to $250,000 per entity.
Federal Funds Rate. The rate of interest at which Fed funds are traded. This rate is currently pegged by the Federal Reserve through open-market operations.
Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB). Government sponsored wholesale banks which lend funds and provide correspondent banking service to member commercial banks, thrift institutions, credit unions and insurance companies. The mission of the FHLBs is to liquefy the housing related assets of its members who must purchase stock in their district Bank.
Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA or Fannie Mae). A federal corporation working under the auspices of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). It is the largest single provider of residential mortgage funds 17 Item 1.
10 in the United States. FNMA is a private stockholder-owned corporation and assumes and guarantees that all security holders will receive timely payment of principal and interest. The corporation’s purchases include a variety or adjustable mortgages and second loans, in addition to fixed-rate mortgages. FNMA’s securities are highly liquid and are widely accepted.
Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), Consists of seven members of the Federal Reserve Board and five of the twelve Federal Reserve Bank Presidents.
The President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is a permanent member, while the other Presidents serve on a rotating basis. The Committee periodically meets to set Federal Reserve guidelines regarding purchases and sales of Government Securities in the open market as a means of influencing the volume of bank credit and money.
Federal Reserve System. The central bank of the United States which consists of a seven member Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., 12 regional banks and about 5,700 commercial banks that are members.
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA or Ginnie Mae).
Securities influencing the volume of bank credit guaranteed by GNMA and issued by mortgage bankers, commercial banks, savings and loan associations, and other institutions. Security holder is protected by full faith and credit of the U.S.
Government. Ginnie Mae securities are backed by the FHA, VA or FHA mortgages.
Interest Rate. The annual yield earned on an investment, expressed as a percentage.
Liquidity. The quality of an asset that permits it to be converted quickly into cash without a significant loss in value.
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). A special fund in the State Treasury which local agencies may use to deposit funds for investment and for reinvestment.
Each agency is currently limited by LAIF to an investment of $50 million.
Marketability. The measure of ease with which a security can be sold in the secondary market.
Market Risk. Defined as market value fluctuations due to overall changes in the general level of interest rates structuring the portfolio based on historic and current cash flow analysis eliminating the need to sell securities prior to maturity and avoiding the purchase of long term securities for the sole purpose of short term speculation.
Market Value - The price at which a security is trading and could presumably be purchased or sold.
18 Item 1.
11 Master Repurchase Agreement. A written contract covering all future transactions between the parties to repurchase-reverse repurchase agreements that establish each party’s rights in the transactions. A master agreement will often specify, among other things, the right of the buyer-lender to liquidate the underlying securities in the event of default by the seller-borrower Maturity Date. The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable.
Money Market. The market in which short-term debt instruments (bills, commercial paper, bankers’ acceptance, etc.) are issued and traded.
Mutual Fund. An investment company that pools money and can invest in a variety of securities, including fixed-income securities and money market instruments. Mutual funds are regulated by the Investment Company Act of 1940 and must abide by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) disclosure guidelines.
Offer. The price asked by a seller of securities.
Open Market Operations. Purchases and sales of government and certain other securities in the open market by the New York Federal Reserve Bank as directed by the FOMC in order to influence the volume of money and credit in the economy.
Purchases inject reserves into the bank system and stimulate growth of money and credit; sales have the opposite effect. Open market operations are the Federal Reserve’s most important and most flexible monetary policy tool.
Portfolio. Collection of securities held by an investor.
Primary Dealer. A group of government securities dealers who submit daily reports of market activity and positions and monthly financial statements to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight.
Primary dealers include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registered securities broker-dealers, banks, and a few unregulated firms.
Principal. The face amount or par value of a debt instrument.
Prudent Person Standard. A standard of conduct where a person acts with care, skill, prudence, and diligence when investing or reinvesting.
Qualified Public Depositories. A financial institution which does not claim exemption from the payment of any sales or compensating use or ad valorem taxes under the laws of the state, which has segregated for the benefit of the commission eligible collateral having a value of not less than its maximum liability 19 Item 1.
12 and which has been approved by the Public Deposit Protection Commission to hold public deposits.
Rate of Return. The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond or the current income return.
Repurchase Agreement (RP or REPO). A holder of securities sells these securities to an investor with an agreement to repurchase them at a fixed price on a fixed date. The security buyer in effect lends the seller money for the period of the agreement, and the terms of the agreement are structured to compensate him for this.
Reverse Repurchase Agreement (Reverse REPO). A reverse-repurchase agreement involves investor borrowing cash from a financial institution in exchange for securities. The investor agrees to repurchase the securities at a specified date for the same cash value plus an agreed upon interest rate. Although the transaction is similar to a repo, the purpose of entering into a reverse repo is quite different. While a repo is a straightforward investment of public funds, the reverse repo is a borrowing.
Safekeeping. A service to customers rendered by banks for a fee whereby securities and valuables of all types and descriptions are held in the bank’s vaults for protection.
Secondary Market. A market made for the purchase and sale of outstanding issues following the initial distribution.
Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC). Agency created by Congress to protect investors in securities transaction by administering securities legislation.
Treasury Bills. A non-interest bearing discount security issued by the U.S.
Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in three months, six months, or one year.
Treasury Bonds. Long-term coupon-bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. government and having initial maturities of more than ten years.
Treasury Notes. Medium-term coupon-bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities from two to ten years.
Trustee. A Bank designated as the custodian of funds and the official representative for bondholders. In this capacity, the trustee is responsible for 20 Item 1.
13 enforcing the bondholder’s contract with the issuer.
Uniform Net Capital Rule. Securities and Exchange Commission requirement that member firms as well as nonmember broker-dealers in securities maintain a maximum ratio of indebtedness to liquid capital of 15 to 1; also called net capital rule and net capital ratio. Indebtedness covers all money owed to a firm, including margin loans and commitments to purchase securities, one reason new public issues are spread among members of underwriting syndicates. Liquid capital includes cash and assets easily converted into cash.
Yield. The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed as a percentage. Income yield is obtained by dividing the current dollar income by the current market price for the security. Net yield or yield to maturity is the current income yield minus any premium above par or plus any discount from par in purchase price, with the adjustment spread over the period from the date of purchase to the date of maturity of the bond.
21 Item 1.
CITY OF OROVILLE
STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: JACKIE GLOVER, ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
BILL LAGRONE, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
RE: MEETING CALENDAR FOR 2022
DATE: JANUARY 4, 2022
SUMMARY
The City Council may consider adopting the City Meeting Calendar for 2022.
DISCUSSION
Each year at the first meeting in January the Council reviews and adopts a meeting calendar showing when the City Council, Commissions, and Formal Committees will meet. Attached is a draft for 2022 and staff recommend approving the calendar.
FISCAL IMPACT
None
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the City’s Meeting Calendar for 2022.
ATTACHMENTS
2022 Draft Meeting Calendar
22 Item 2.
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 1 2 3 4 5
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 30 31 27 28
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 2 1 2 3 4
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 2 1 2 3
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 28 29 30 31
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 1 2 3
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 30 31 27 28 29 30
Development & Public Facilities Committee (meets on an as needed basis) FINAL 01/05/2021
AUGUST SEPTEMBER
Regular Meetings - *Closed Session ** Open Session ***Public Hearings will be held at 5:15pm or later
OCTOBER NOVEMBER
Finance Committee (meets on an as needed basis)
JULY
DECEMBER
Park Commission (2nd Tuesday every other month at 5:15 p.m. ) Arts Commission (2nd Tuesday every other month at 4:00 p.m. ) City Council (1st and 3rd Tuesday of each month at 4:00 p.m.* AND 4:30 p.m**) Supplemental Benefits Fund Steering Committee (4th Wednesday of each quarter at 2 p.m) Citizens Oversight Committee (4th Tuesday of each quarter at 6:00) Executive Committee ( meets as needed)
Housing Loan Advisory Committee (2nd Thursday of each month at 10:00 a.m.) Economic Development Loan Advisory Committee (meets on an as needed basis) Holiday
APRIL
CITY OF OROVILLE MEETING SCHEDULE - 2022
JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH
MAY JUNE
Planning Commission (4th Thursday of each month at 6:00 p.m. 3rd Thursday Nov. and Dec.) 23 Item 2.
OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: LIZ EHRENSTROM, HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGER
SUBJECT: MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE
DATE: JANUARY 4, 2022
SUMMARY
State of California received a minimum wage increase on January 1, 2022, from $14.00 per hour to $15.00 per hour. Also, adding the new Recycling Coordinator position to the master salary schedule.
DISCUSSION
This is to update the City Council that minimum wage increased from $14.00 per hour to $15.00 per hour effective, January 1, 2022. The City currently has two positions that are affected, the Staff Assistant and Community Development Technician I. Both positions are being updated to incorporate the new minimum wage increase. One employee will receive an increased based on the increase to minimum wage. The salary schedule at Step A for these positions will be updated from $14.64 to $15.00 per hour on the salary range. Staff has also added the new position of Recycling Coordinator position, previously approved, to the master salary schedule.
FISCAL IMPACT – None. Changes to the Master Salary Schedule only.
RECOMMENDATIONS – Approve the Master Salary Schedule to include the Recycling Coordinator position and an increase to minimum wage for two positions.
ATTACHMENTS: Master Salary Schedule
24 Item 3.
Revised: September 21, 2021 Approved by Council: September 21, 2021 Mayor $500 Monthly
Council Members $400 Monthly
Treasurer $400 Monthly
CLASSIFICATION: STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H City Administrator $130,588 $137,117 $143,973 $151,172 $158,730 $166,667 $175,000 Bonus* Annual $10,882.31 $11,426.42 $11,997.74 $12,597.63 $13,227.51 $13,888.89 $14,583.33 Monthly $62.78 $65.92 $69.22 $72.68 $76.31 $80.13 $84.13 Hourly Assistant City Administrator -
Development Services Dept. $118,720 $124,965 $131,540 $138,465 $145,750 $153,425 $161,500 $170,000.00 Annual Assistant City Administrator -
Administration Dept. $9,893.33 $10,413.75 $10,961.67 $11,538.75 $12,145.83 $12,785.42 $13,458.33 $14,166.67 Monthly Assistant City Administrator -
Public Safety Dept. $57.08 $60.08 $63.24 $66.57 $70.07 $73.76 $77.64 $81.73 Hourly Assistant Development Services
Director $84,370.00 $88,590.00 $93,020.00 $97,672.00 $102,555.00 $107,683.00 $113,067.00 $118,720.00 Annual $7,030.83 $7,382.50 $7,751.67 $8,139.33 $8,546.25 $8,973.58 $9,422.25 $9,893.33 Monthly $40.56 $42.59 $44.72 $46.96 $49.31 $51.77 $54.36 $57.08 Hourly CLASSIFICATION: STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H Battalion Chief $81,076.26 $85,130.07 $89,386.58 $93,855.91 $98,548.70 $103,476.14 $108,649.94 $114,082.44 Annual $6,756.36 $7,094.17 $7,448.88 $7,821.33 $8,212.39 $8,623.01 $9,054.16 $9,506.87 Monthly $38.98 $40.93 $42.97 $45.12 $47.38 $49.75 $52.24 $54.85 Hourly CLASSIFICATION: STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H Project Manager/Sr. Civil Engineer $85,281.76 $89,545.85 $94,023.14 $98,724.30 $103,660.51 $108,843.54 $114,285.71 $120,000.00 Annual $7,106.81 $7,462.15 $7,835.26 $8,227.02 $8,638.38 $9,070.29 $9,523.81 $10,000.00 Monthly $41.00 $43.05 $45.20 $47.46 $49.84 $52.33 $54.95 $57.69 Hourly Police Lieutenant $87,692.08 $92,076.68 $96,680.52 $101,514.54 $106,590.27 $111,919.78 $117,515.77 $123,391.56 Annual $7,307.67 $7,673.06 $8,056.71 $8,459.55 $8,882.52 $9,326.65 $9,792.98 $10,282.63 Monthly $42.15965 $44.26764 $46.48102 $48.80507 $51.24532 $53.80759 $56.49797 $59.32287 Hourly Management Analyst III $75,626.26 $81,916.33 $86,013.53 $90,314.42 $94,829.61 $99,570.77 $104,549.57 $109,777.69 Annual Airport Manager $6,302.19 $6,826.36 $7,167.79 $7,526.20 $7,902.47 $8,297.56 $8,712.46 $9,148.14 Monthly HR Manager $36.35878 $39.38285 $41.35266 $43.42039 $45.59116 $47.87056 $50.26422 $52.77774 Hourly IT Manager
Building Official
Public Works Manager
CLASSIFICATION: STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I STEP J STEP K STEP L STEP M STEP N STEP O Project Manager/Sr. Civil Engineer $85,281.76 $87,413.80 $89,545.85 $91,784.49 $94,023.14 $96,373.72 $98,724.30 $101,192.40 $103,660.51 $106,252.03 $108,843.54 $111,564.63 $114,285.71 $117,142.86 $120,000.00 Annual $7,106.81 $7,284.48 $7,462.15 $7,648.71 $7,835.26 $8,031.14 $8,227.02 $8,432.70 $8,638.38 $8,854.34 $9,070.29 $9,297.05 $9,523.81 $9,761.90 $10,000.00 Monthly $41.00 $42.03 $43.05 $44.13 $45.20 $46.33 $47.46 $48.65 $49.84 $51.08 $52.33 $53.64 $54.95 $56.32 $57.69 Hourly Police Lieutenant $87,692.08 $89,884.38 $92,076.68 $94,378.60 $96,680.52 $99,097.53 $101,514.54 $104,052.41 $106,590.27 $109,255.03 $111,919.78 $114,717.78 $117,515.77 $120,453.67 $123,391.56 Annual $7,307.67 $7,490.37 $7,673.06 $7,864.88 $8,056.71 $8,258.13 $8,459.55 $8,671.03 $8,882.52 $9,104.59 $9,326.65 $9,559.81 $9,792.98 $10,037.81 $10,282.63 Monthly $42.16 $43.21 $44.27 $45.37 $46.48 $47.64 $48.81 $50.03 $51.25 $52.53 $53.81 $55.15 $56.50 $57.91 $59.32 Hourly Management Analyst III $75,626.26 $77,516.92 $81,916.33 $83,964.24 $86,013.53 $88,163.87 $90,314.42 $92,572.28 $94,829.61 $97,200.35 $99,570.77 $102,060.04 $104,549.57 $103,476.00 $109,777.69 Annual Airport Manager $6,302.19 $6,459.74 $6,826.36 $6,997.02 $7,167.79 $7,346.99 $7,526.20 $7,714.36 $7,902.47 $8,100.03 $8,297.56 $8,505.00 $8,712.46 $8,623.00 $9,148.14 Monthly HR Manager $36.36 $37.27 $39.38 $40.37 $41.35 $42.39 $43.42 $44.51 $45.59 $46.73 $47.87 $49.07 $50.26 $49.75 $52.78 Hourly IT Manager
Building Official
Public Works Manager
CLASSIFICATION: STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H
OROVILLE PUBLIC SAFETY MID-MANAGER'S ASSOCIATION
1ST TIER OROVILLE MID-MANAGER AND CONFIDENTIAL ASSOCIATION 1ST TIER OROVILLE POLICE OFFICER'S ASSOCIATION SWORN SALARY SCHEDULE 2nd TIER OROVILLE MID-MANAGER AND CONFIDENTIAL ASSOCIATION
CITY OF OROVILLE MASTER SALARY SCHEDULE
ELECTED OFFICIAL'S STIPEND SCHEDULE
Plus $5/Mtg. Up to 2 Mtgs. Per Month
DEPARTMENT HEAD'S SALARY SCHEDULE
25 Item 3.
Sergeant $71,387.77 $74,957.16 $78,705.02 $82,640.27 $86,772.28 $91,110.90 $95,666.44 $100,449.77 Annual $5,948.98 $6,246.43 $6,558.75 $6,886.69 $7,231.02 $7,592.57 $7,972.20 $8,370.81 Monthly $34.32105 $36.03710 $37.83895 $39.73090 $41.71744 $43.80332 $45.99348 $48.29316 Hourly Rotational Detective/OIC $59,916.31 $62,912.13 $66,057.74 $69,360.62 $72,828.65 $76,470.09 $80,293.59 $84,308.27 Annual 5% Above Police Officer $4,993.03 $5,242.68 $5,504.81 $5,780.05 $6,069.05 $6,372.51 $6,691.13 $7,025.69 Monthly $28.80592 $30.24622 $31.75853 $33.34645 $35.01378 $36.76446 $38.60269 $40.53282 Hourly Police Officer $57,063.15 $59,916.30 $62,912.12 $66,057.72 $69,360.61 $72,828.64 $76,470.07 $80,293.58 Annual $4,755.26 $4,993.03 $5,242.68 $5,504.81 $5,780.05 $6,069.05 $6,372.51 $6,691.13 Monthly $27.43421 $28.80592 $30.24621 $31.75852 $33.34645 $35.01377 $36.76446 $38.60268 Hourly Reserve Police Officer $27.43421 $28.80592 $30.24621 $31.75852 $33.34645 $35.01377 $36.76446 $38.60268 Hourly Reserve Investigator $25.00000 Hourly
CLASSIFICATION: STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G Police Admin. Assistant $41,349.46 $43,416.94 $45,587.78 $47,867.17 $50,260.53 $52,773.56 $55,412.24 Annual $3,445.79 $3,618.08 $3,798.98 $3,988.93 $4,188.38 $4,397.80 $4,617.69 Monthly $19.87955 $20.87353 $21.91720 $23.01306 $24.16372 $25.37190 $26.64050 Hourly Police Dispatcher $41,413.58 $43,484.26 $45,658.47 $47,941.40 $50,338.47 $52,855.39 $55,498.16 Annual $3,451.13 $3,623.69 $3,804.87 $3,995.12 $4,194.87 $4,404.62 $4,624.85 Monthly $19.91038 $20.90589 $21.95119 $23.04875 $24.20119 $25.41124 $26.68181 Hourly MLE $36,817.45 $38,658.32 $40,591.23 $42,620.80 $44,751.84 $46,989.43 $49,338.90 Annual $3,068.12 $3,221.53 $3,382.60 $3,551.73 $3,729.32 $3,915.79 $4,111.57 Monthly $17.70070 $18.58573 $19.51502 $20.49077 $21.51531 $22.59107 $23.72062 Hourly Police Records Techician $34,650.30 $36,382.82 $38,201.96 $40,112.06 $42,117.66 $44,223.54 $46,434.72 Annual $2,887.53 $3,031.90 $3,183.50 $3,342.67 $3,509.81 $3,685.30 $3,869.56 Monthly $16.65880 $17.49174 $18.36633 $19.28464 $20.24888 $21.26132 $22.32439 Hourly Police Recuit $38,417.60 Annual
$3,201.47 Monthly
$18.47 Hourly
CLASSIFICATION: STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I STEP J STEP K STEP L STEP M STEP N STEP O Sergeant $71,387.77 $73,172.47 $74,957.16 $76,831.09 $78,705.02 $80,672.65 $82,640.27 $84,706.28 $86,772.28 $88,941.59 $91,110.90 $93,388.67 $95,666.44 $98,058.11 $100,449.77 Annual $5,948.98 $6,097.71 $6,246.43 $6,402.59 $6,558.75 $6,722.72 $6,886.69 $7,058.86 $7,231.02 $7,411.80 $7,592.57 $7,782.39 $7,972.20 $8,171.51 $8,370.81 Monthly $34.32105 $35.17907 $36.03710 $36.93802 $37.83895 $38.78493 $39.73090 $40.72417 $41.71744 $42.76038 $43.80332 $44.89840 $45.99348 $47.14332 $48.29316 Hourly Rotational Detective/OIC $59,916.31 $61,414.22 $62,912.13 $64,484.93 $66,057.74 $67,709.18 $69,360.62 $71,094.64 $72,828.65 $74,649.37 $76,470.09 $78,381.84 $80,293.59 $82,300.93 $84,308.27 Annual 5% Above Police Officer $4,993.03 $5,117.85 $5,242.68 $5,373.74 $5,504.81 $5,642.43 $5,780.05 $5,924.55 $6,069.05 $6,220.78 $6,372.51 $6,531.82 $6,691.13 $6,858.41 $7,025.69 Monthly $28.80592 $29.52607 $30.24622 $31.00237 $31.75853 $32.55249 $33.34645 $34.18011 $35.01378 $35.88912 $36.76446 $37.68358 $38.60269 $39.56776 $40.53282 Hourly Police Officer $57,063.15 $58,489.73 $59,916.30 $61,414.21 $62,912.12 $64,484.92 $66,057.72 $67,709.17 $69,360.61 $71,094.63 $72,828.64 $74,649.36 $76,470.07 $78,381.83 $80,293.58 Annual $4,755.26 $4,874.14 $4,993.03 $5,117.85 $5,242.68 $5,373.74 $5,504.81 $5,642.43 $5,780.05 $5,924.55 $6,069.05 $6,220.78 $6,372.51 $6,531.82 $6,691.13 Monthly $27.43421 $28.12006 $28.80592 $29.52606 $30.24621 $31.00237 $31.75852 $32.55248 $33.34645 $34.18011 $35.01377 $35.88911 $36.76446 $37.68357 $38.60268 Hourly Reserve Police Officer $27.43421 $28.12006 $28.80592 $29.52606 $30.24621 $31.00237 $31.75852 $32.55248 $33.34645 $34.18011 $35.01377 $35.88911 $36.76446 $37.68357 $38.60268 Hourly Reserve Investigator $25.00000 Hourly
CLASSIFICATION: STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I STEP J STEP K STEP L STEP M Police Admin. Assistant $41,349.46 $42,383.20 $43,416.94 $44,502.36 $45,587.78 $46,727.48 $47,867.17 $49,063.85 $50,260.53 $51,517.05 $52,773.56 $54,092.90 $55,412.24 Annual $3,445.79 $3,531.93 $3,618.08 $3,708.53 $3,798.98 $3,893.96 $3,988.93 $4,088.65 $4,188.38 $4,293.09 $4,397.80 $4,507.74 $4,617.69 Monthly $19.87955 $20.37654 $20.87353 $21.39537 $21.91720 $22.46513 $23.01306 $23.58839 $24.16372 $24.76781 $25.37190 $26.00620 $26.64050 Hourly Police Dispatcher $41,413.58 $42,448.92 $43,484.26 $44,571.37 $45,658.47 $46,799.93 $47,941.40 $49,139.93 $50,338.47 $51,596.93 $52,855.39 $54,176.77 $55,498.16 Annual $3,451.13 $3,537.41 $3,623.69 $3,714.28 $3,804.87 $3,899.99 $3,995.12 $4,094.99 $4,194.87 $4,299.74 $4,404.62 $4,514.73 $4,624.85 Monthly $19.91038 $20.40813 $20.90589 $21.42854 $21.95119 $22.49997 $23.04875 $23.62497 $24.20119 $24.80621 $25.41124 $26.04653 $26.68181 Hourly MLE $36,817.45 $37,737.89 $38,658.32 $39,624.78 $40,591.24 $41,606.02 $42,620.80 $43,686.32 $44,751.84 $45,870.64 $46,989.43 $48,164.17 $49,338.90 Annual $3,068.12 $3,144.82 $3,221.53 $3,302.07 $3,382.60 $3,467.17 $3,551.73 $3,640.53 $3,729.32 $3,822.55 $3,915.79 $4,013.68 $4,111.58 Monthly $17.7007 $18.1432 $18.5857 $19.0504 $19.5150 $20.0029 $20.4908 $21.0030 $21.5153 $22.0532 $22.5911 $23.1559 $23.7206 Hourly Police Records Techician $34,650.30 $35,516.56 $36,382.82 $37,292.39 $38,201.96 $39,157.00 $40,112.05 $41,114.85 $42,117.66 $43,170.60 $44,223.54 $45,329.13 $46,434.72 Annual $2,887.53 $2,959.71 $3,031.90 $3,107.70 $3,183.50 $3,263.08 $3,342.67 $3,426.24 $3,509.80 $3,597.55 $3,685.29 $3,777.43 $3,869.56 Monthly $16.6588 $17.0753 $17.4917 $17.9290 $18.3663 $18.8255 $19.2846 $19.7668 $20.2489 $20.7551 $21.2613 $21.7928 $22.3244 Hourly Police Recuit $38,417.60 Annual
1ST TIER OROVILLE POLICE OFFICER'S ASSOCIATION NON-SWORN SALARY SCHEDULE 2ND TIER OROVILLE POLICE OFFICER'S ASSOCIATION SWORN SALARY SCHEDULE 2ND TIER OROVILLE POLICE OFFICER'S ASSOCIATION NON-SWORN SALARY SCHEDULE 26 Item 3.
$3,201.47 Monthly
$18.47 Hourly
CLASSIFICATION: STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G Fire Captain $61,864.70 $64,957.94 $68,205.83 $71,616.12 $75,196.93 $78,956.78 $82,904.61 Annual $5,155.39 $5,413.16 $5,683.82 $5,968.01 $6,266.41 $6,579.73 $6,908.72 Monthly $21.24 $22.31 $23.42 $24.59 $25.82 $27.11 $28.47 Hourly Fire Lieutenant $55,302.76 $58,067.90 $60,971.29 $64,019.86 $67,220.85 $70,581.89 $74,110.99 Annual $4,608.56 $4,838.99 $5,080.94 $5,334.99 $5,601.74 $5,881.82 $6,175.92 Monthly $18.99 $19.94 $20.94 $21.98 $23.08 $24.24 $25.45 Hourly Fire Engineer $52,669.29 $55,302.75 $58,067.89 $60,971.29 $64,019.85 $67,220.84 $70,581.89 Annual $4,389.11 $4,608.56 $4,838.99 $5,080.94 $5,334.99 $5,601.74 $5,881.82 Monthly $18.09 $18.99 $19.94 $20.94 $21.98 $23.08 $24.24 Hourly Firefighter $47,898.65 $50,293.58 $52,808.26 $55,448.67 $58,221.11 $61,132.16 $64,188.77 Annual $3,991.55 $4,191.13 $4,400.69 $4,620.72 $4,851.76 $5,094.35 $5,349.06 Monthly $16.45 $17.27 $18.13 $19.04 $19.99 $20.99 $22.04 Hourly CLASSIFICATION: STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I STEP J STEP K STEP L STEP M Fire Captain $61,864.70 $63,411.32 $64,957.94 $66,581.88 $68,205.83 $69,910.98 $71,616.12 $73,406.53 $75,196.93 $77,076.85 $78,956.78 $80,930.70 $82,904.61 Annual $5,155.39 $5,284.28 $5,413.16 $5,548.49 $5,683.82 $5,825.91 $5,968.01 $6,117.21 $6,266.41 $6,423.07 $6,579.73 $6,744.22 $6,908.72 Monthly $21.24 $21.78 $22.31 $22.86 $23.42 $24.01 $24.59 $25.21 $25.82 $26.47 $27.11 $27.79 $28.47 Hourly Fire Lieutenant $55,302.76 $56,685.33 $58,067.90 $59,519.60 $60,971.29 $62,495.58 $64,019.86 $65,620.35 $67,220.85 $68,901.37 $70,581.89 $72,346.44 $74,110.99 Annual $4,608.56 $4,723.78 $4,838.99 $4,959.97 $5,080.94 $5,207.96 $5,334.99 $5,468.36 $5,601.74 $5,741.78 $5,881.82 $6,028.87 $6,175.92 Monthly $18.62 $19.47 $19.94 $20.44 $20.94 $21.46 $21.98 $22.53 $23.08 $23.66 $24.24 $24.84 $25.45 Hourly Fire Engineer $52,669.29 $53,986.02 $55,302.75 $56,685.32 $58,067.89 $59,519.59 $60,971.29 $62,495.57 $64,019.85 $65,620.35 $67,220.84 $68,901.36 $70,581.89 Annual $4,389.11 $4,498.84 $4,608.56 $4,723.78 $4,838.99 $4,959.97 $5,080.94 $5,207.96 $5,334.99 $5,468.36 $5,601.74 $5,741.78 $5,881.82 Monthly $17.73 $18.54 $18.99 $19.47 $19.94 $20.44 $20.94 $21.46 $21.98 $22.53 $23.08 $23.66 $24.24 Hourly Firefighter $47,898.65 $49,096.12 $50,293.58 $51,550.92 $52,808.26 $54,128.47 $55,448.67 $56,834.89 $58,221.11 $59,676.64 $61,132.16 $62,660.47 $64,188.77 Annual $3,991.55 $4,091.34 $4,191.13 $4,295.91 $4,400.69 $4,510.71 $4,620.72 $4,736.24 $4,851.76 $4,973.05 $5,094.35 $5,221.71 $5,349.06 Monthly $16.45 $16.86 $17.27 $17.70 $18.13 $18.59 $19.04 $19.52 $19.99 $20.49 $20.99 $21.52 $22.04 Hourly CLASSIFICATION: STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H Associate Civil Engr. $76,655.71 $80,488.50 $84,512.92 $88,738.57 $93,175.49 $97,834.27 $102,725.98 $107,862.28 Annual $6,387.98 $6,707.37 $7,042.74 $7,394.88 $7,764.62 $8,152.86 $8,560.50 $8,988.52 Monthly $36.85371 $38.69639 $40.63121 $42.66277 $44.79591 $47.03571 $49.38749 $51.85687 Hourly Associate Planner $59,259.02 $62,221.97 $65,333.07 $68,599.72 $72,029.71 $75,631.19 $79,412.75 $83,383.39 Annual Recycling Coordinator $4,938.25 $5,185.16 $5,444.42 $5,716.64 $6,002.48 $6,302.60 $6,617.73 $6,948.62 Monthly $28.48991 $29.91441 $31.41013 $32.98064 $34.62967 $36.36115 $38.17921 $40.08817 Hourly Sr. Code Compliance Specialist $58,889.00 $61,833.45 $64,925.12 $68,171.38 $71,579.95 $75,158.94 $78,916.89 $82,862.74 Annual $4,907.42 $5,152.79 $5,410.43 $5,680.95 $5,965.00 $6,263.25 $6,576.41 $6,905.23 Monthly $28.31202 $29.72762 $31.21400 $32.77470 $34.41344 $36.13411 $37.94081 $39.83785 Hourly GIS Specialist $58,599.54 $61,529.52 $64,605.99 $67,836.29 $71,228.11 $74,789.51 $78,528.99 $82,455.44 Annual $4,883.30 $5,127.46 $5,383.83 $5,653.02 $5,935.68 $6,232.46 $6,544.08 $6,871.29 Monthly $28.17286 $29.58150 $31.06057 $32.61360 $34.24428 $35.95650 $37.75432 $39.64204 Hourly Sr. Admin/SBF/PIO $57,608.58 $60,489.01 $63,513.46 $66,689.13 $70,023.59 $73,524.77 $77,201.01 $81,061.06 Annual $4,800.72 $5,040.75 $5,292.79 $5,557.43 $5,835.30 $6,127.06 $6,433.42 $6,755.09 Monthly $27.69643 $29.08125 $30.53532 $32.06208 $33.66519 $35.34845 $37.11587 $38.97166 Hourly Assistant Planner $54,560.25 $57,288.26 $60,152.68 $63,160.31 $66,318.32 $69,634.24 $73,115.95 $76,771.75 Annual $4,546.69 $4,774.02 $5,012.72 $5,263.36 $5,526.53 $5,802.85 $6,093.00 $6,397.65 Monthly $26.23089 $27.54243 $28.91956 $30.36553 $31.88381 $33.47800 $35.15190 $36.90950 Hourly Signal Tech/Electrician $52,828.27 $55,469.68 $58,243.17 $61,155.33 $64,213.09 $67,423.75 $70,794.93 $74,334.68 Annual $4,402.36 $4,622.47 $4,853.60 $5,096.28 $5,351.09 $5,618.65 $5,899.58 $6,194.56 Monthly $25.39821 $26.66812 $28.00152 $29.40160 $30.87168 $32.41526 $34.03603 $35.73783 Hourly IT Analyst $51,289.58 $53,854.06 $56,546.76 $59,374.10 $62,342.81 $65,459.95 $68,732.94 $72,169.59 Annual Accounting Analyst $4,274.13 $4,487.84 $4,712.23 $4,947.84 $5,195.23 $5,455.00 $5,727.75 $6,014.13 Monthly $24.65845 $25.89137 $27.18594 $28.54524 $29.97250 $31.47113 $33.04468 $34.69692 Hourly 1ST TIER OROVILLE FIRE FIGHTER'S ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE 2ND TIER OROVILLE FIRE FIGHTER'S ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE 1ST TIER OROVILLE CITY EMPLOYEE'S ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE 27 Item 3.
Code Enforcement Specialist $48,448.14 $50,870.55 $53,414.07 $56,084.78 $58,889.02 $61,833.47 $64,925.14 $68,171.40 Annual $4,037.35 $4,239.21 $4,451.17 $4,673.73 $4,907.42 $5,152.79 $5,410.43 $5,680.95 Monthly $23.29238 $24.45699 $25.67984 $26.96384 $28.31203 $29.72763 $31.21401 $32.77471 Hourly Admin/Program Analyst II $47,820.59 $50,211.62 $52,722.20 $55,358.31 $58,126.23 $61,032.54 $64,084.16 $67,288.37 Annual $3,985.05 $4,184.30 $4,393.52 $4,613.19 $4,843.85 $5,086.04 $5,340.35 $5,607.36 Monthly $22.99067 $24.14020 $25.34721 $26.61457 $27.94530 $29.34257 $30.80969 $32.35018 Hourly Building/Fire Inspector $46,872.53 $49,216.16 $51,676.96 $54,260.81 $56,973.85 $59,822.55 $62,813.67 $65,954.36 Annual Code & Cons Compl Spec. $3,906.04 $4,101.35 $4,306.41 $4,521.73 $4,747.82 $4,985.21 $5,234.47 $5,496.20 Monthly Construction Inspector $22.53487 $23.66161 $24.84469 $26.08693 $27.39128 $28.76084 $30.19888 $31.70883 Hourly Sr. Accountant Technician $44,341.51 $46,558.59 $48,886.51 $51,330.84 $53,897.38 $56,592.25 $59,421.86 $62,392.96 Annual $3,695.13 $3,879.88 $4,073.88 $4,277.57 $4,491.45 $4,716.02 $4,951.82 $5,199.41 Monthly $21.31803 $22.38394 $23.50313 $24.67829 $25.91220 $27.20781 $28.56820 $29.99661 Hourly Accounting Technician III $44,140.60 $46,347.63 $48,665.01 $51,098.26 $53,653.18 $56,335.83 $59,152.63 $62,110.26 Annual $3,678.38 $3,862.30 $4,055.42 $4,258.19 $4,471.10 $4,694.65 $4,929.39 $5,175.85 Monthly $21.22144 $22.28251 $23.39664 $24.56647 $25.79480 $27.08454 $28.43876 $29.86070 Hourly Program Analyst I $42,609.89 $44,740.38 $46,977.40 $49,326.27 $51,792.59 $54,382.22 $57,101.33 $59,956.39 Annual $3,550.82 $3,728.37 $3,914.78 $4,110.52 $4,316.05 $4,531.85 $4,758.44 $4,996.37 Monthly $20.48552 $21.50980 $22.58529 $23.71455 $24.90028 $26.14530 $27.45256 $28.82519 Hourly Lead Equipment Mechanic $42,335.88 $44,452.67 $46,675.31 $49,009.07 $51,459.53 $54,032.50 $56,734.13 $59,570.83 Annual Lead Public Works Operator $3,527.99 $3,704.39 $3,889.61 $4,084.09 $4,288.29 $4,502.71 $4,727.84 $4,964.24 Monthly Lead Tree Worker $20.35379 $21.37148 $22.44005 $23.56205 $24.74016 $25.97716 $27.27602 $28.63982 Hourly Lead Collection System Operator
Sr. Administrative Assistant $42,036.56 $44,138.39 $46,345.31 $48,662.57 $51,095.70 $53,650.49 $56,333.01 $59,149.66 Annual $3,503.05 $3,678.20 $3,862.11 $4,055.21 $4,257.98 $4,470.87 $4,694.42 $4,929.14 Monthly $20.20988 $21.22038 $22.28140 $23.39547 $24.56524 $25.79350 $27.08318 $28.43734 Hourly Assistant City Clerk $41,455.25 $43,528.01 $45,704.41 $47,989.63 $50,389.12 $52,908.57 $55,554.00 $58,331.70 Annual $3,454.60 $3,627.33 $3,808.70 $3,999.14 $4,199.09 $4,409.05 $4,629.50 $4,860.97 Monthly $19.93041 $20.92693 $21.97328 $23.07194 $24.22554 $25.43681 $26.70865 $28.04409 Hourly Accounting Technician II $40,127.82 $42,134.21 $44,240.92 $46,452.97 $48,775.62 $51,214.40 $53,775.12 $56,463.87 Annual $3,343.99 $3,511.18 $3,686.74 $3,871.08 $4,064.63 $4,267.87 $4,481.26 $4,705.32 Monthly $19.29222 $20.25683 $21.26967 $22.33316 $23.44982 $24.62231 $25.85342 $27.14609 Hourly Comm. Devel. Technician III $39,820.97 $41,812.02 $43,902.62 $46,097.75 $48,402.64 $50,822.77 $53,363.91 $56,032.10 Annual $3,318.41 $3,484.33 $3,658.55 $3,841.48 $4,033.55 $4,235.23 $4,446.99 $4,669.34 Monthly $19.14470 $20.10193 $21.10703 $22.16238 $23.27050 $24.43402 $25.65573 $26.93851 Hourly Public Works Operator III $38,389.69 $40,309.17 $42,324.63 $44,440.86 $46,662.91 $48,996.05 $51,445.86 $54,018.15 Annual $3,199.14 $3,359.10 $3,527.05 $3,703.41 $3,888.58 $4,083.00 $4,287.15 $4,501.51 Monthly $18.45658 $19.37941 $20.34838 $21.36580 $22.43409 $23.55579 $24.73358 $25.97026 Hourly Accountant $38,303.80 $40,218.99 $42,229.94 $44,341.44 $46,558.51 $48,886.43 $51,330.76 $53,897.29 Annual $3,191.98 $3,351.58 $3,519.16 $3,695.12 $3,879.88 $4,073.87 $4,277.56 $4,491.44 Monthly $18.41529 $19.33605 $20.30286 $21.31800 $22.38390 $23.50309 $24.67825 $25.91216 Hourly Administrative Assistant $37,686.61 $39,570.94 $41,549.49 $43,626.96 $45,808.31 $48,098.73 $50,503.66 $53,028.84 Annual Comm. Devel. Technician II $3,140.55 $3,297.58 $3,462.46 $3,635.58 $3,817.36 $4,008.23 $4,208.64 $4,419.07 Monthly $18.11856 $19.02449 $19.97572 $20.97450 $22.02323 $23.12439 $24.28061 $25.49464 Hourly Equipment Mechanic $37,486.37 $39,360.69 $41,328.72 $43,395.16 $45,564.92 $47,843.16 $50,235.32 $52,747.09 Annual $3,123.86 $3,280.06 $3,444.06 $3,616.26 $3,797.08 $3,986.93 $4,186.28 $4,395.59 Monthly $18.02229 $18.92341 $19.86958 $20.86306 $21.90621 $23.00152 $24.15160 $25.35918 Hourly Code Enforcement Technician $37,196.21 $39,056.02 $41,008.82 $43,059.26 $45,212.23 $47,472.84 $49,846.48 $52,338.80 Annual $3,099.68 $3,254.67 $3,417.40 $3,588.27 $3,767.69 $3,956.07 $4,153.87 $4,361.57 Monthly $17.88279 $18.77693 $19.71578 $20.70157 $21.73665 $22.82348 $23.96465 $25.16289 Hourly Public Works Operator II $36,581.51 $38,410.59 $40,331.11 $42,347.67 $44,465.05 $46,688.31 $49,022.72 $51,473.86 Annual Parks Maint. Technician II $3,048.46 $3,200.88 $3,360.93 $3,528.97 $3,705.42 $3,890.69 $4,085.23 $4,289.49 Monthly Building Maint. Tech II $17.58726 $18.46663 $19.38996 $20.35946 $21.37743 $22.44630 $23.56862 $24.74705 Hourly Collection System Operator II
Accounting Technician $36,479.84 $38,303.83 $40,219.02 $42,229.97 $44,341.47 $46,558.55 $48,886.47 $51,330.80 Annual $3,039.99 $3,191.99 $3,351.59 $3,519.16 $3,695.12 $3,879.88 $4,073.87 $4,277.57 Monthly $17.53838 $18.41530 $19.33607 $20.30287 $21.31802 $22.38392 $23.50311 $24.67827 Hourly Public Works Operator I $34,032.52 $35,734.15 $37,520.85 $39,396.90 $41,366.74 $43,435.08 $45,606.83 $47,887.17 Annual 28 Item 3.
Parks Maint. Technician I $2,836.04 $2,977.85 $3,126.74 $3,283.07 $3,447.23 $3,619.59 $3,800.57 $3,990.60 Monthly Collection System Operator I $16.36179 $17.17988 $18.03887 $18.94082 $19.88786 $20.88225 $21.92636 $23.02268 Hourly Custodian
Staff Assistant $31,200.00 $32,760.00 $34,398.00 $36,117.90 $37,923.80 $39,819.98 $41,810.98 $43,901.53 Annual Comm. Devel. Technician I $2,600.00 $2,730.00 $2,866.50 $3,009.83 $3,160.32 $3,318.33 $3,484.25 $3,658.46 Monthly $15.00000 $15.75000 $16.53750 $17.36438 $18.23259 $19.14422 $20.10143 $21.10651 Hourly CLASSIFICATION: STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I STEP J STEP K STEP L STEP M STEP N STEP O Associate Civil Engr. $76,655.71 $78,572.10 $80,488.50 $82,500.71 $84,512.92 $86,625.74 $88,738.57 $90,957.03 $93,175.49 $95,504.88 $97,834.27 $100,280.13 $102,725.98 $105,294.13 $107,862.28 Annual $6,387.98 $6,547.68 $6,707.37 $6,875.06 $7,042.74 $7,218.81 $7,394.88 $7,579.75 $7,764.62 $7,958.74 $8,152.86 $8,356.68 $8,560.50 $8,774.51 $8,988.52 Monthly $36.85371 $37.77505 $38.69639 $39.66380 $40.63121 $41.64699 $42.66277 $43.72934 $44.79591 $45.91581 $47.03571 $48.21160 $49.38749 $50.62218 $51.85687 Hourly Associate Planner $59,259.02 $60,740.50 $62,221.97 $63,777.52 $65,333.07 $66,966.40 $68,599.72 $70,314.72 $72,029.71 $73,830.45 $75,631.19 $77,521.97 $79,412.75 $81,398.07 $83,383.39 Annual Recycling Coordinator $4,938.25 $5,061.71 $5,185.16 $5,314.79 $5,444.42 $5,580.53 $5,716.64 $5,859.56 $6,002.48 $6,152.54 $6,302.60 $6,460.16 $6,617.73 $6,783.17 $6,948.62 Monthly $28.48991 $29.20216 $29.91441 $30.66227 $31.41013 $32.19538 $32.98064 $33.80515 $34.62967 $35.49541 $36.36115 $37.27018 $38.17921 $39.13369 $40.08817 Hourly Sr. Code Compliance Specialist $58,889.00 $60,361.23 $61,833.45 $63,379.29 $64,925.12 $66,548.25 $68,171.38 $69,875.66 $71,579.95 $73,369.45 $75,158.94 $77,037.92 $78,916.89 $80,889.81 $82,862.74 Annual $4,907.42 $5,030.10 $5,152.79 $5,281.61 $5,410.43 $5,545.69 $5,680.95 $5,822.97 $5,965.00 $6,114.12 $6,263.25 $6,419.83 $6,576.41 $6,740.82 $6,905.23 Monthly $28.31202 $29.01982 $29.72762 $30.47081 $31.21400 $31.99435 $32.77470 $33.59407 $34.41344 $35.27377 $36.13411 $37.03746 $37.94081 $38.88933 $39.83785 Hourly GIS Specialist $58,599.54 $60,064.53 $61,529.52 $63,067.75 $64,605.99 $66,221.14 $67,836.29 $69,532.20 $71,228.11 $73,008.81 $74,789.51 $76,659.25 $78,528.99 $80,492.21 $82,455.44 Annual $4,883.30 $5,005.38 $5,127.46 $5,255.65 $5,383.83 $5,518.43 $5,653.02 $5,794.35 $5,935.68 $6,084.07 $6,232.46 $6,388.27 $6,544.08 $6,707.68 $6,871.29 Monthly $28.17286 $28.87718 $29.58150 $30.32104 $31.06057 $31.83709 $32.61360 $33.42894 $34.24428 $35.10039 $35.95650 $36.85541 $37.75432 $38.69818 $39.64204 Hourly Sr. Admin Assist/SBF/PIO $57,608.58 $59,048.79 $60,489.01 $62,001.23 $63,513.46 $65,101.30 $66,689.13 $68,356.36 $70,023.59 $71,774.18 $73,524.77 $75,362.89 $77,201.01 $79,131.03 $81,061.06 Annual $4,800.72 $4,920.73 $5,040.75 $5,166.77 $5,292.79 $5,425.11 $5,557.43 $5,696.36 $5,835.30 $5,981.18 $6,127.06 $6,280.24 $6,433.42 $6,594.25 $6,755.09 Monthly $27.69643 $28.39 $29.08 $29.81 $30.54 $31.30 $32.06 $32.86 $33.67 $34.51 $35.35 $36.23 $37.12 $38.04 $38.97 Hourly Assistant Planner $54,560.25 $55,924.26 $57,288.26 $58,720.47 $60,152.68 $61,656.49 $63,160.31 $64,739.32 $66,318.32 $67,976.28 $69,634.24 $71,375.10 $73,115.95 $74,943.85 $76,771.75 Annual $4,546.69 $4,660.35 $4,774.02 $4,893.37 $5,012.72 $5,138.04 $5,263.36 $5,394.94 $5,526.53 $5,664.69 $5,802.85 $5,947.92 $6,093.00 $6,245.32 $6,397.65 Monthly $26.23089 $26.88666 $27.54243 $28.23099 $28.91956 $29.64254 $30.36553 $31.12467 $31.88381 $32.68091 $33.47800 $34.31495 $35.15190 $36.03070 $36.90950 Hourly Signal Tech/Electrician $52,828.27 $54,148.98 $55,469.68 $56,856.43 $58,243.17 $59,699.25 $61,155.33 $62,684.21 $64,213.09 $65,818.42 $67,423.75 $69,109.34 $70,794.93 $72,564.81 $74,334.68 Annual $4,402.36 $4,512.41 $4,622.47 $4,738.04 $4,853.60 $4,974.94 $5,096.28 $5,223.68 $5,351.09 $5,484.87 $5,618.65 $5,759.11 $5,899.58 $6,047.07 $6,194.56 Monthly $25.39821 $26.03316 $26.66812 $27.33482 $28.00152 $28.70156 $29.40160 $30.13664 $30.87168 $31.64347 $32.41526 $33.22564 $34.03603 $34.88693 $35.73783 Hourly Accounting Analyst $51,289.58 $52,571.82 $53,854.06 $55,200.41 $56,546.76 $57,960.43 $59,374.10 $60,858.45 $62,342.81 $63,901.38 $65,459.95 $67,096.44 $68,732.94 $70,451.27 $72,169.59 Annual IT Analyst $4,274.13 $4,380.98 $4,487.84 $4,600.03 $4,712.23 $4,830.04 $4,947.84 $5,071.54 $5,195.23 $5,325.11 $5,455.00 $5,591.37 $5,727.75 $5,870.94 $6,014.13 Monthly $24.65845 $25.27491 $25.89137 $26.53866 $27.18594 $27.86559 $28.54524 $29.25887 $29.97250 $30.72181 $31.47113 $32.25791 $33.04468 $33.87080 $34.69692 Hourly Code Enforcement Specialist $48,448.14 $49,659.34 $50,870.55 $52,142.31 $53,414.07 $54,749.43 $56,084.78 $57,486.90 $58,889.02 $60,361.24 $61,833.47 $63,379.30 $64,925.14 $66,548.27 $68,171.40 Annual $4,037.35 $4,138.28 $4,239.21 $4,345.19 $4,451.17 $4,562.45 $4,673.73 $4,790.57 $4,907.42 $5,030.10 $5,152.79 $5,281.61 $5,410.43 $5,545.69 $5,680.95 Monthly $23.29238 $23.87468 $24.45699 $25.06842 $25.67984 $26.32184 $26.96384 $27.63793 $28.31203 $29.01983 $29.72763 $30.47082 $31.21401 $31.99436 $32.77471 Hourly Admin/Program Analyst II $47,820.59 $49,016.10 $50,211.62 $51,466.91 $52,722.20 $54,040.26 $55,358.31 $56,742.27 $58,126.23 $59,579.38 $61,032.54 $62,558.35 $64,084.16 $65,686.27 $67,288.37 Annual $3,985.05 $4,084.68 $4,184.30 $4,288.91 $4,393.52 $4,503.35 $4,613.19 $4,728.52 $4,843.85 $4,964.95 $5,086.04 $5,213.20 $5,340.35 $5,473.86 $5,607.36 Monthly $22.99067 $23.56543 $24.14020 $24.74371 $25.34721 $25.98089 $26.61457 $27.27994 $27.94530 $28.64393 $29.34257 $30.07613 $30.80969 $31.57994 $32.35018 Hourly Building/Fire Inspector $46,872.53 $48,044.34 $49,216.16 $50,446.56 $51,676.96 $52,968.89 $54,260.81 $55,617.33 $56,973.85 $58,398.20 $59,822.55 $61,318.11 $62,813.67 $64,384.01 $65,954.36 Annual Code & Cons Compl Spec. $3,906.04 $4,003.70 $4,101.35 $4,203.88 $4,306.41 $4,414.07 $4,521.73 $4,634.78 $4,747.82 $4,866.52 $4,985.21 $5,109.84 $5,234.47 $5,365.33 $5,496.20 Monthly Construction Inspector $22.53487 $23.09824 $23.66161 $24.25315 $24.84469 $25.46581 $26.08693 $26.73910 $27.39128 $28.07606 $28.76084 $29.47986 $30.19888 $30.95385 $31.70883 Hourly Sr. Accountant Technician $44,341.51 $45,450.05 $46,558.59 $47,722.55 $48,886.51 $50,108.68 $51,330.84 $52,614.11 $53,897.38 $55,244.82 $56,592.25 $58,007.06 $59,421.86 $60,907.41 $62,392.96 Annual $3,695.13 $3,787.50 $3,879.88 $3,976.88 $4,073.88 $4,175.72 $4,277.57 $4,384.51 $4,491.45 $4,603.73 $4,716.02 $4,833.92 $4,951.82 $5,075.62 $5,199.41 Monthly $21.31803 $21.85098 $22.38394 $22.94353 $23.50313 $24.09071 $24.67829 $25.29525 $25.91220 $26.56001 $27.20781 $27.88801 $28.56820 $29.28241 $29.99661 Hourly Accounting Technician III $44,140.60 $45,244.12 $46,347.63 $47,506.32 $48,665.01 $49,881.64 $51,098.26 $52,375.72 $53,653.18 $54,994.50 $56,335.83 $57,744.23 $59,152.63 $60,631.44 $62,110.26 Annual $3,678.38 $3,770.34 $3,862.30 $3,958.86 $4,055.42 $4,156.80 $4,258.19 $4,364.64 $4,471.10 $4,582.88 $4,694.65 $4,812.02 $4,929.39 $5,052.62 $5,175.85 Monthly $21.22144 $21.75198 $22.28251 $22.83958 $23.39664 $23.98156 $24.56647 $25.18063 $25.79480 $26.43967 $27.08454 $27.76165 $28.43876 $29.14973 $29.86070 Hourly Program Analyst I $42,609.89 $43,675.14 $44,740.38 $45,858.89 $46,977.40 $48,151.84 $49,326.27 $50,559.43 $51,792.59 $53,087.40 $54,382.22 $55,741.77 $57,101.33 $58,528.86 $59,956.39 Annual $3,550.82 $3,639.59 $3,728.37 $3,821.57 $3,914.78 $4,012.65 $4,110.52 $4,213.29 $4,316.05 $4,423.95 $4,531.85 $4,645.15 $4,758.44 $4,877.41 $4,996.37 Monthly $20.48552 $20.99766 $21.50980 $22.04755 $22.58529 $23.14992 $23.71455 $24.30742 $24.90028 $25.52279 $26.14530 $26.79893 $27.45256 $28.13888 $28.82519 Hourly Lead Equipment Mechanic $42,335.88 $43,394.28 $44,452.67 $45,563.99 $46,675.31 $47,842.19 $49,009.07 $50,234.30 $51,459.53 $52,746.01 $54,032.50 $55,383.32 $56,734.13 $58,152.48 $59,570.83 Annual Lead Public Works Operator $3,527.99 $3,616.19 $3,704.39 $3,797.00 $3,889.61 $3,986.85 $4,084.09 $4,186.19 $4,288.29 $4,395.50 $4,502.71 $4,615.28 $4,727.84 $4,846.04 $4,964.24 Monthly Lead Tree Worker $20.35379 $20.86263 $21.37148 $21.90576 $22.44005 $23.00105 $23.56205 $24.15111 $24.74016 $25.35866 $25.97716 $26.62659 $27.27602 $27.95792 $28.63982 Hourly Lead Collection System Operator
Sr. Administrative Assistant $42,036.56 $43,087.47 $44,138.39 $45,241.85 $46,345.31 $47,503.94 $48,662.57 $49,879.14 $51,095.70 $52,373.09 $53,650.49 $54,991.75 $56,333.01 $57,741.34 $59,149.66 Annual $3,503.05 $3,590.62 $3,678.20 $3,770.15 $3,862.11 $3,958.66 $4,055.21 $4,156.59 $4,257.98 $4,364.42 $4,470.87 $4,582.65 $4,694.42 $4,811.78 $4,929.14 Monthly $20.20988 $20.71513 $21.22038 $21.75089 $22.28140 $22.83843 $23.39547 $23.98035 $24.56524 $25.17937 $25.79350 $26.43834 $27.08318 $27.76026 $28.43734 Hourly 2ND TIER OROVILLE CITY EMPLOYEE'S ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE 29 Item 3.
Assistant City Clerk $41,455.25 $42,491.63 $43,528.01 $44,616.21 $45,704.41 $46,847.02 $47,989.63 $49,189.37 $50,389.12 $51,648.84 $52,908.57 $54,231.29 $55,554.00 $56,942.85 $58,331.70 Annual $3,454.60 $3,540.97 $3,627.33 $3,718.02 $3,808.70 $3,903.92 $3,999.14 $4,099.11 $4,199.09 $4,304.07 $4,409.05 $4,519.27 $4,629.50 $4,745.24 $4,860.97 Monthly $19.93041 $20.42867 $20.92693 $21.45010 $21.97328 $22.52261 $23.07194 $23.64874 $24.22554 $24.83117 $25.43681 $26.07273 $26.70865 $27.37637 $28.04409 Hourly Accounting Technician II $40,127.82 $41,131.02 $42,134.21 $43,187.57 $44,240.92 $45,346.94 $46,452.97 $47,614.29 $48,775.62 $49,995.01 $51,214.40 $52,494.76 $53,775.12 $55,119.49 $56,463.87 Annual $3,343.99 $3,427.58 $3,511.18 $3,598.96 $3,686.74 $3,778.91 $3,871.08 $3,967.86 $4,064.63 $4,166.25 $4,267.87 $4,374.56 $4,481.26 $4,593.29 $4,705.32 Monthly $19.29222 $19.77453 $20.25683 $20.76325 $21.26967 $21.80142 $22.33316 $22.89149 $23.44982 $24.03606 $24.62231 $25.23786 $25.85342 $26.49976 $27.14609 Hourly Comm. Devel. Tech III $39,820.97 $40,816.49 $41,812.02 $42,857.32 $43,902.62 $45,000.18 $46,097.75 $47,250.19 $48,402.64 $49,612.70 $50,822.77 $52,093.34 $53,363.91 $54,698.01 $56,032.10 Annual $3,318.41 $3,401.37 $3,484.33 $3,571.44 $3,658.55 $3,750.02 $3,841.48 $3,937.52 $4,033.55 $4,134.39 $4,235.23 $4,341.11 $4,446.99 $4,558.17 $4,669.34 Monthly $19.14470 $19.62331 $20.10193 $20.60448 $21.10703 $21.63470 $22.16238 $22.71644 $23.27050 $23.85226 $24.43402 $25.04487 $25.65573 $26.29712 $26.93851 Hourly Public Works Operator III $38,389.69 $39,349.43 $40,309.17 $41,316.90 $42,324.63 $43,382.75 $44,440.86 $45,551.89 $46,662.91 $47,829.48 $48,996.05 $50,220.95 $51,445.86 $52,732.00 $54,018.15 Annual $3,199.14 $3,279.12 $3,359.10 $3,443.08 $3,527.05 $3,615.23 $3,703.41 $3,795.99 $3,888.58 $3,985.79 $4,083.00 $4,185.08 $4,287.15 $4,394.33 $4,501.51 Monthly $18.45658 $18.91800 $19.37941 $19.86390 $20.34838 $20.85709 $21.36580 $21.89995 $22.43409 $22.99494 $23.55579 $24.14469 $24.73358 $25.35192 $25.97026 Hourly Accountant $38,303.80 $39,261.40 $40,218.99 $41,224.46 $42,229.94 $43,285.69 $44,341.44 $45,449.97 $46,558.51 $47,722.47 $48,886.43 $50,108.59 $51,330.76 $52,614.02 $53,897.29 Annual $3,191.98 $3,271.78 $3,351.58 $3,435.37 $3,519.16 $3,607.14 $3,695.12 $3,787.50 $3,879.88 $3,976.87 $4,073.87 $4,175.72 $4,277.56 $4,384.50 $4,491.44 Monthly $18.41529 $18.87567 $19.33605 $19.81945 $20.30286 $20.81043 $21.31800 $21.85095 $22.38390 $22.94350 $23.50309 $24.09067 $24.67825 $25.29520 $25.91216 Hourly Administrative Assistant $37,686.61 $38,628.78 $39,570.94 $40,560.21 $41,549.49 $42,588.22 $43,626.96 $44,717.64 $45,808.31 $46,953.52 $48,098.73 $49,301.19 $50,503.66 $51,766.25 $53,028.84 Annual Comm. Devel. Tech II $3,140.55 $3,219.06 $3,297.58 $3,380.02 $3,462.46 $3,549.02 $3,635.58 $3,726.47 $3,817.36 $3,912.79 $4,008.23 $4,108.43 $4,208.64 $4,313.85 $4,419.07 Monthly $18.11856 $18.57153 $19.02449 $19.50010 $19.97572 $20.47511 $20.97450 $21.49886 $22.02323 $22.57381 $23.12439 $23.70250 $24.28061 $24.88762 $25.49464 Hourly Equipment Mechanic $37,486.37 $38,423.53 $39,360.69 $40,344.71 $41,328.72 $42,361.94 $43,395.16 $44,480.04 $45,564.92 $46,704.04 $47,843.16 $49,039.24 $50,235.32 $51,491.20 $52,747.09 Annual $3,123.86 $3,201.96 $3,280.06 $3,362.06 $3,444.06 $3,530.16 $3,616.26 $3,706.67 $3,797.08 $3,892.00 $3,986.93 $4,086.60 $4,186.28 $4,290.93 $4,395.59 Monthly $18.02229 $18.47285 $18.92341 $19.39649 $19.86958 $20.36632 $20.86306 $21.38463 $21.90621 $22.45387 $23.00152 $23.57656 $24.15160 $24.75539 $25.35918 Hourly Code Enforcement Technician $37,196.21 $38,126.12 $39,056.02 $40,032.42 $41,008.82 $42,034.04 $43,059.26 $44,135.74 $45,212.23 $46,342.53 $47,472.84 $48,659.66 $49,846.48 $51,092.64 $52,338.80 Annual $3,099.68 $3,177.18 $3,254.67 $3,336.04 $3,417.40 $3,502.84 $3,588.27 $3,677.98 $3,767.69 $3,861.88 $3,956.07 $4,054.97 $4,153.87 $4,257.72 $4,361.57 Monthly $17.88279 $18.32986 $18.77693 $19.24636 $19.71578 $20.20867 $20.70157 $21.21911 $21.73665 $22.28006 $22.82348 $23.39407 $23.96465 $24.56377 $25.16289 Hourly Public Works Operator II $36,581.51 $37,496.05 $38,410.59 $39,370.85 $40,331.11 $41,339.39 $42,347.67 $43,406.36 $44,465.05 $45,576.68 $46,688.31 $47,855.51 $49,022.72 $50,248.29 $51,473.86 Annual Parks Maint. Technician II $3,048.46 $3,124.67 $3,200.88 $3,280.90 $3,360.93 $3,444.95 $3,528.97 $3,617.20 $3,705.42 $3,798.06 $3,890.69 $3,987.96 $4,085.23 $4,187.36 $4,289.49 Monthly Building Maint. Tech II $17.58726 $18.02695 $18.46663 $18.92829 $19.38996 $19.87471 $20.35946 $20.86844 $21.37743 $21.91187 $22.44630 $23.00746 $23.56862 $24.15783 $24.74705 Hourly Collection System Operator II
Accounting Technician $36,479.84 $37,391.84 $38,303.83 $39,261.43 $40,219.02 $41,224.50 $42,229.97 $43,285.72 $44,341.47 $45,450.01 $46,558.55 $47,722.51 $48,886.47 $50,108.64 $51,330.80 Annual $3,039.99 $3,115.99 $3,191.99 $3,271.79 $3,351.59 $3,435.37 $3,519.16 $3,607.14 $3,695.12 $3,787.50 $3,879.88 $3,976.88 $4,073.87 $4,175.72 $4,277.57 Monthly $17.53838 $17.97684 $18.41530 $18.87569 $19.33607 $19.81947 $20.30287 $20.81044 $21.31802 $21.85097 $22.38392 $22.94351 $23.50311 $24.09069 $24.67827 Hourly Public Works Operator I $34,032.52 $34,883.33 $35,734.15 $36,627.50 $37,520.85 $38,458.87 $39,396.90 $40,381.82 $41,366.74 $42,400.91 $43,435.08 $44,520.95 $45,606.83 $46,747.00 $47,887.17 Annual Parks Maint. Technician I $2,836.04 $2,906.94 $2,977.85 $3,052.29 $3,126.74 $3,204.91 $3,283.07 $3,365.15 $3,447.23 $3,533.41 $3,619.59 $3,710.08 $3,800.57 $3,895.58 $3,990.60 Monthly Collection System Operator I $16.36179 $16.77083 $17.17988 $17.60937 $18.03887 $18.48984 $18.94082 $19.41434 $19.88786 $20.38505 $20.88225 $21.40431 $21.92636 $22.47452 $23.02268 Hourly Custodian
Staff Assistant $31,200.00 $31,980.00 $32,760.00 $33,579.00 $34,398.00 $35,257.95 $36,117.90 $37,020.85 $37,923.80 $38,871.89 $39,819.98 $40,815.48 $41,810.98 $42,856.26 $43,901.53 Annual Comm. Devel. Tech I $2,600.00 $2,665.00 $2,730.00 $2,798.25 $2,866.50 $2,938.16 $3,009.83 $3,085.07 $3,160.32 $3,239.32 $3,318.33 $3,401.29 $3,484.25 $3,571.35 $3,658.46 Monthly $15.00000 $15.37500 $15.75000 $16.14375 $16.53750 $16.95094 $17.36438 $17.79848 $18.23259 $18.68841 $19.14422 $19.62283 $20.10143 $20.60397 $21.10651 Hourly
FROZEN POSITIONS
Revisions:
01/01/2019 Increase in Minimum Wage for Park Tech I
07/01/18 2% COLA OFFA Based on Section 6.3 of MOU
07/01/19 4% COLA OPOA Sworn & Non-Sworn per Res. No. 8778 & 8779 07/01/19 Budget changes for classification of Park Tech I moves to PW Ops I range; Park Tech III - Tree Lead Worker at Lead Eqiup Mechanic range; PW Ops III - PW Ops Lead at Lead Equip Mechanic range 07/01/19 Add Code Enforcement Technician per budget
07/01/19 Add Project Manager/Sr. Civil Engineer per budget 07/01/19 Unfroze Admin/Program Analyst II per budget
07/01/19 Unfroze Program Analyst I per budget
07/01/19 Mayor, City Council & Treasurer received 10% cutback returned per budget 07/16/19 Side Letter Agreement to Add Police Lt. to OMCA 07/16/19 Established new salary range for City Administrator per Mayor Appt. on 07/16/19 08/06/19 Establish new salary range for Accounting Technician II and III 09/17/19 Change in job Title and salary range for dept heads per Resolution #8815 12/17/19 Added Assistant Community Development Services Director 1/7/2020 OCEA 3% Increase Per Resolution No. 8829
04/07/20 Added 2 new positions; IT Analyst and Accounting Analyst 07/01/20 OCEA 3% Increase Per Resolution No. 8829 and update sewer position classification titles to Collection System Operators; Updated Comm. Devel. Tech I, II and III; OPOA Sworn and Non-Sworn 4% increase Per Resolution No. 8778 04/20/21 Added new Custodian position 30
Item 3.
07/01/21 OCEA 3%, OMA Misc 3%, OMA Saf 4%, OPOA 4%
01/04/22 Added Recycling Coordinator, Increase in Minimum wage 31 Item 3.
CITY OF OROVILLE
STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR REYNOLDS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: AMY BERGSTRAND, MANAGEMENT ANALYST III
BUSINESS ASSISTANCE/HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
RE: HOUSING PROGRAM FUND LOAN FOR PROSPECT VIEW
APARTMENTS
DATE: JANUARY 4, 2022
SUMMARY
Council will consider approving a Housing Program Fund loan to AMG & Associates for the development of Prospect View Apartments located at 135 Nelson Ave., Oroville CA.
DISCUSSION
City staff received a request dated November 15, 2021, from affordable housing developers, AMG, & Associates, for a loan of $1,000,000 to help facilitate the financing, development, and construction of a 39-unit income-restricted permanent supportive housing project targeted to homeless and mentally disabled individuals. An additional unit will be reserved for an on-site resident manager. The project will include on-site case management offices in which individualized supportive services will be provided to the residents with the intent of helping them restore their lives. There will be a mix of 36 one-bedroom units (647 gross sq. ft.) and 4 two-bedroom units (838 gross sq. ft),
The units will be newly constructed apartments in one, two-story residential building with an elevator and a community building. The building will be oriented appropriately on the site with the intent to create a community concept for residents to enjoy while remaining social and active. Outdoor amenities include a community courtyard with pergolas, an enclosed dog park, and a garden with raised planter beds, and a fire pit. The development will include a large community building of 3,103 sq. ft.) with accessible common spaces including office space, a business center, exercise room, case management offices, a meeting room and two laundry rooms. The on-site resident manager will provide assistance and management while residing in a two-bedroom manager’s unit.
The project will be financed utilizing a combination of No Place Like Home (NPLH) grant funds, 9% tax credits, project based rental assistance from the Housing Authority of the County of Butte and the Housing Program funds (former RDA Housing Set-Aside). The project has already received financing commitments for NPLH funds, 9% tax credits and the project rental assistance.
32 Item 4.
Loan terms are described below:
Loan Amount: $1,000,000
Interest Rate: The proposed loan will bear no interest from disbursement through and including the construction loan closing until the earlier of (i) the permanent loan conversion or (ii) the third (3rd) anniversary of the Projects construction loan closing, after which the outstanding principal balance of the loan will bear interest at a simple rate not to exceed three percent (3%) per year.
Maturity Date: The loan will mature in fifty-five years from the date of Certificate of Occupancy or equivalent issued by the City of Oroville.
Uses of the Loan Proceeds: The loan proceeds will be used to finance a portion of predevelopment, development, and construction costs of the Project.
Repayment Limited to Residual Receipts: Annual installments to repay the loan are limited to 20% of Residual Receipts generated by the project.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no General Fund Impact
A loan in the amount of $1,000,000 will be funded by Housing Program Funds, Fund 221.
The balance of this fund as of November 30, 2021, is $3,256,260.52
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 9012 – A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE SECURITY
DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE HOUSING PROGRAM FUND LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,000,000 WITH AMG & ASSOCIATES FOR PROSPECT VIEW APARTMENTS.
ATTACHMENTS
1- Resolution No. 9012
2- Letter from AMG & Associates
33 Item 4.
CITY OF OROVILLE
RESOLUTION NO. 9012
A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE SECURITY DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE HOUSING PROGRAM FUND LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,000,000 WITH AMG & ASSOCIATES FOR PROSPECT VIEW APARTMENTS.
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Oroville City Council as follows:
1. The Mayor is authorized and directed to execute the security documents associated with the Housing Program Fund loan in the amount of $1,000,000 with AMG & Associates for Prospect View Apartments.
2. The City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oroville at a regular meeting on January 4, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Chuck Reynolds, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
Scott E. Huber, City Attorney Jackie Glover, Assistant City Clerk 34 Item 4.
I,'i . 1
A M G" .& A S S O C I A T E S 16633 Ventura Blvd. Suite 1014 Encino, CA 91436
PAC FIC
VV E S T
COMMUNITIES
November 15, 2021
Amy Bergstrand
Business Assistance/Housing Development
1735 Montgomery Street
Oroville, CA 95965
Re: Prospect View Apartments
Request for RDA Set-Aside Funds
Dear Ms. Bergstrand,
AMG & Associate's respectfully requests a contribution of $1,00,000 in RDA Set-Aside Funds from the City of Oroville ("RDA Set-Aside Loan") to help facilitate the financing, development and construction of a 40 unit income-restricted permanent supportive housing project located at 135 Nelson Avenue in the City of Oroville ("Project"). The Project will be financed utilizing a combination of No Place Like Home funds, 9% tax credits, project based rental assistance from the Housing Authority of the County of Butte, and the RDA Set-Aside Loan. The Project has already received financing commitments for the NPLH funds, 9% tax credits and project based rental assistance.
The construction industry is currently facing a multitude of issues and constraints that are causing projects to become :financially infeasible. These include lack of skilled labor and a limited subcontractor base, supply chain issues causing projects to be delayed months in some instances, and inflation driving costs to an all-time igh are just a few of the challenges we face. This Project is also required to pay federal davis bacon wages due to the project based rental assistance that's been cornrnitted to the Project. This alone can cause drive costs 20-40% higher on a Project such as this.
Thank you for your consideration of tis request. This RDA Set-Aside Loan is an extremely important part of the overall financing strategy for the project and will ensure the project has adequate funding to be developed and built as proposed. Attached please find a project description, Loan Term Sheet and drawings for the project.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Best regards,
Cameron Jo
AMG & Associates, LLC
35 Item 4.
CITY OF OROVILLE
STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR REYNOLDS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: AMY BERGSTRAND, MANAGEMENT ANALYST III
BUSINESS ASSISTANCE/HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
RE: EXTENSION AND ADDITION TO THE EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING
AGREEMENT (ENA) WITH VETERANS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION (VHDC)
DATE: JANUARY 4, 2022
SUMMARY
Council may consider extending the ENA with VHDC until January 31, 2023 to develop affordable housing for veterans and their families.
Additionally, Council may consider the transfer a newly developed 3.91-acre parcel located behind the City’s corporation yard to develop affordable, multi-family, permanent supportive housing for veterans and their families.
DISCUSSION
On November 19, 2019, Council approved an ENA with VHDC to transfer eight (8) Successor Agency Housing properties to rehabilitate and/or newly construct units for affordable housing to income qualified veterans.
The ENA consisted of multiple projects that would encompass three (3) phases. The first phase would transfer five (5) single-family homes, to VHDC, who would in turn, rehabilitate the home and sell to an income-qualified veteran. To date, one home has been sold, an additional home is in escrow and a 3rd is currently being rehabilitated.
The second phase involved transferring two vacant residential lots and one vacant commercial lot that would become single-family veteran residents. The commercial lot has been rezoned to allow for duplex/condos type homes that would be sold to income eligible veterans. The city is expecting plans within the coming months.
Lastly, city staff would like to transfer the new Mitchell Ave parcel to VHDC in order to develop two, 30-unit, multi-family, permanent supportive housing units for homeless and at-risk veterans and their families. The property is in the process of being divided and a new parcel created.
36 Item 5.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no General Fund Impact
Housing Program Fund assets equaling the approximate amount of $400,000 to be transferred from 7011-1418910 to the VHDC.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Adopt Resolution No. 9013 – A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
MAYOR TO EXTEND THE EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF OROVILLE AND VETERANS HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION UNTIL JANUARY 31, 2023.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 9014 – A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
MAYOR TO TRANSFER THE NEWLY CREATED PARCEL LOCATED ON
MITCHELL AVE. TO THE VETERANS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO
EXTREMELY-LOW AND VERY-LOW INCOME VETERANS AND THEIR
FAMILIES.
ATTACHMENTS
1- Resolution No. 9013
2- Resolution No. 9014
3- ENA with New parcel legal description (A-3319-1)
37 Item 5.
CITY OF OROVILLE
RESOLUTION NO. 9013
A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE SECURITY DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE HOUSING PROGRAM FUND LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,750,000 WITH VHDC FOR VETERAN VILLAGE APARTMENTS.
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Oroville City Council as follows:
1. The Mayor is authorized and directed to execute the security documents associated with the Housing Program Fund loan in the amount of $1,750,000 with VHDC for Veteran Village Apartments.
2. The City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oroville at a regular meeting on January 4, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Chuck Reynolds, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
Scott E. Huber, City Attorney Jackie Glover, Assistant City Clerk 38 Item 5.
OAK #4815-4106-7412 v3 A-3319-1
1 ADDENDUM TO EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING RIGHTS AGREEMENT
Extension and Property Addition.
(APN Nos. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT I)
This Addendum (“Addendum”) dated January 4, 2021, 2022, is to the Exclusive Negotiating Rights Agreement (“ENA”) between the City of Oroville (“City”) and Veterans Housing Development Corporation (“Developer”) . The purpose of this addendum is to extend the original ENA executed November 19, 2019, as well as to add the Oroville City Corporate Yard, commonly known as 1275 Mitchell St. Oroville, CA 95965 (“Corporate Yard”), to the list of properties subject to the ENA. In consideration of the terms and conditions herein, the City and the Developer agree that the ENA shall be amended as follows:
1. This addendum will extend the original ENA negotiation period as stated in Article 1 section 1.2 through January 31, 2023.
2. In addition, this addendum will add to the list of properties already under the original ENA to include the Corporate Yard site for the proposed permanent supportive housing project.
See Exhibit I - Site Legal Description, attached to this Addendum.
3. Conflicts between the ENA and this Addendum shall be controlled by this Addendum.
All other provisions within the ENA shall remain in full force and effect.
CITY:
CITY OF OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA, a municipal
corporation
By: _____________________________
Bill LaGrone City Administrator.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ___________________
Scott E Huber City Attorney
DEVELOPER:
VETERANS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, a California nonprofit public
benefit corporation
By: _____________________________
Brad Long, Executive Director and
Authorized Signatory
39 Item 5.
OAK #4815-4106-7412 v3
EXHIBIT I
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The land referred to herein is situated in the State of California, County of Butte, City of Oroville, and is described as follows:
A portion of that parcel as described in that deed to the City of Oroville recorded on October 27, 1947 in Book 447, at Page 36, Butte County Official Records being more particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at the northeast corner of Parcel “A” as shown on that Parcel Map filed for record in the office of the Butte County Recorder on March 14, 1968, in Book 36 of Maps, at
the southerly right-of-way line of Mitchell Avenue as shown on said Parcel Map; Thence, along the east line of said Parcel “A”, South 00°15’14” West, 338.92 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence, leaving said east line, North 74°32’44” East, 26.90 feet; Thence North 71°37’26” East, 78.60 feet;
Thence North 72°29’07” East, 194.78 feet;
Thence North 89°58’39” East, 120.04 feet;
Thence North 85°37’34” East, 19.32 feet;
Thence North 88°54’20” East, 81.63 feet to the east boundary of said City of Oroville parcel, said boundary being the west boundary of Exception Number 5 as described in said Book 447, at
Recorder under Book 84 of Maps, at Page 23;
Thence, along said east boundary, South 00°51’19” West, 336.67 feet to an angle point therein; Thence, continuing along said east boundary, South 09°51’31” West, 152.12 feet to the southeast corner of said City of Oroville parcel, and the north boundary of Parcel 2 as shown on that Parcel Map filed for record in the office of the Butte County Recorder in Book 67 of Maps, at Pages 53- 54;
Thence, along the southerly and southwesterly boundary of said City of Oroville parcel and the northerly and northeasterly boundary of said Parcel 2, the following three courses:
1. North 81°59’58” West, 197.30 feet;
2. Thence North 41°16’58” West, 158.67 feet;
3. Thence North 36°12’54” West, 108.12 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Parcel 2, also being the most easterly corner of said Parcel “A” as shown on that Parcel Map filed for record in the office of the Butte County Recorder in Book 36 of Maps, at Page 31 Exhibit “B” Thence, continuing along said southwesterly and westerly boundary of said City of Oroville parcel and the northeasterly and easterly boundary of said Parcel “A the following three(3) courses:
1. North 36°12’54” West, 171.42 feet;
2. Thence South 65°53’11” West, 12.05 feet;
40 Item 5.
OAK #4815-4106-7412 v3
3. Thence North 00°15’14” East, 25.55 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 3.91 acres more or less.
TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress, egress, roadway and utilities over a portion of that parcel as described in that deed to the City of Oroville recorded on October 27, 1947 in Book 447, at Page 36, Butte County Official Records, more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the northeast corner of Parcel “A” as shown on that Parcel Map filed for record in the office of the Butte County Recorder on March 14, 1968, in Book 36 of Maps, at Page 31, said corner being the northwest corner of said City of Oroville parcel, and located on the southerly right-of-way line of Mitchell Avenue as shown on said Parcel Map; Thence, along the east line of said Parcel “A”, South 00°15’14” West, 338.92 feet; Thence, leaving said east line, North 74°32’44” East, 26.90 feet; Thence North 71°37’26” East, 18.05 feet to a point located 43.00 feet easterly of, measured at right angles to, the east line of said Parcel “A”;
Thence, parallel to said east line, North 00°15’14” East, 215.80 feet to the beginning of a 79.00 foot radius curve, concave easterly;
Thence Northerly, 32.99 feet along said curve, through a central angle of 23°55’26” to the beginning of a 130.00 foot radius reverse curve, concave westerly; Thence Northerly, 103.67 feet along said curve, through a central angle of 45°41’30” to the southerly right-of-way line of Mitchell Avenue;
Thence, along said southerly line, South 66°22’00” West, 56.53 feet to the point of beginning.
The basis of bearings for this description is the south line of Mitchell Avenue as shown on that Parcel Map filed for record in the office of the Butte County Recorder on March 14, 1968, in Book 36 of Maps, at Page 31.
41 Item 5.
CITY OF OROVILLE
RESOLUTION NO. 9014
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO TRANSFER THE NEWLY CREATED PARCEL LOCATED ON MITCHELL AVE. TO THE VETERANS HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO EXTREMELY LOW AND VERY-LOW INCOME VETERANS AND THEIR FAMILIES.
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Oroville City Council as follows:
1. The Mayor is authorized and directed to transfer the newly created parcel located on Mitchell Ave to the Veterans Housing Development Corporation for the purpose of affordable housing to extremely low and very low income veterans and their families.
2. The City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oroville at a regular meeting on January 4, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Chuck Reynolds, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
Scott E. Huber, City Attorney Jackie Glover, Assistant City Clerk 42 Item 5.
CITY OF OROVILLE
STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: JACKIE GLOVER, ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
BILL LAGRONE, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
RE: COMMUNITY MEMBER APPOINTMENTS TO VARIOUS COMMISSIONS
AND COMMITTEES
DATE: JANUARY 4, 2022
SUMMARY
The City Council may appoint community members to serve on the Citizens Oversight Committee, Planning Commission, Arts Commission, Parks Commission, and Housing Loan Advisory Committee to fill current vacancies.
DISCUSSION
The Executive Committee met on December 15, 2021 to review volunteer applications from individuals seeking to serve on various City committees and commissions.
In addition, the Executive Committee considered an additional recommendation the Parks Commission in the event that Commissioner Machelle Conn was unable to return from Medical Leave. Staff spoke with Parks Commissioner Machelle Conn after the Executive Committee meeting, and she has determined that she will be unable to return from her medical leave of absence and resigned effective December 28, 2021.
The Executive Committee recommends the following appointments to the various commissions and committees:
Citizens Oversight Committee:
Sherrie French, Terms Expire – June 30, 2025
Housing Loan Advisory Committee:
Member Christopher Logue and Alternate Cheri Moore, Terms Expire – June 30, 2024 Planning Commission:
Warren Jensen, Term Expire – June 30, 2026
Parks Commission:
Michael Grant Jones and Mickey Rich, Terms Expire – June 30, 2026 Arts Commission:
Jennifer Beers and Misty Rayome, Terms Expire – June 30, 2025 43 Item 6.
FISCAL IMPACT
None
RECOMMENDATION
Appoint Sherrie French to the Citizens Oversight Committee with terms expiring June 30, 2025; and appoint Christopher Logue as Member and Cheri Moore as Alternate to the Housing Loan Advisory Committee with terms expiring June 30, 2024; and appoint Warren Jensen to the Planning Commission with term expiring June 30, 2026; and appoint Michael Grant Jones and Mickey Rich to the Parks Commission with terms expiring of June 30, 2026; and appoint Jennifer Beers and Misty Rayome to the Arts Commission with terms expiring June 30, 2025.
ATTACHMENTS
Applications
44 Item 6.
45 Item 6.
46 Item 6.
47 Item 6.
48 Item 6.
49 Item 6.
50 Item 6.
51 Item 6.
52 Item 6.
53 Item 6.
54 Item 6.
55 Item 6.
56 Item 6.
57 Item 6.
58 Item 6.
59 Item 6.
60 Item 6.
61 Item 6.
62 Item 6.
63 Item 6.
64 Item 6.
65 Item 6.
66 Item 6.
67 Item 6.
68 Item 6.
69 Item 6.
70 Item 6.
71 Item 6.
72 Item 6.
73 Item 6.
74 Item 6.
75 Item 6.
76 Item 6.
77 Item 6.
78 Item 6.
79 Item 6.
80 Item 6.
81 Item 6.
82 Item 6.
83 Item 6.
84 Item 6.
85 Item 6.
86 Item 6.
87 Item 6.
88 Item 6.
89 Item 6.
90 Item 6.
91 Item 6.
92 Item 6.
93 Item 6.
94 Item 6.
95 Item 6.
96 Item 6.
97 Item 6.
CITY OF OROVILLE
STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR REYNOLDS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: RUTH WRIGHT, FINANCE DIRECTOR
CONNOR MUSLER, ASSISTANT PLANNER
RE: PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY INTO THE CITY’S
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
DATE: JANUARY 4, 2022
SUMMARY
The City previously formed several maintenance districts to serve as a funding source to pay for the maintenance and servicing of certain improvements within certain residential housing tracts located throughout the City. The Consolidated Landscape and Lighting Maintenance assessment District (the “LLMAD”) funds landscape and lighting improvements; the Consolidated Benefit Assessment District (the “BAD”) that funds drainage and storm water improvements and related services. The City also manages Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 and Community Facilities District No. 2006-2 (the CFD’s”). Those Districts provide fire, police and emergency services facilities and services, respectively. The Council will consider annexing the Village at Ruddy Creek development into these assessment districts.
DISCUSSION
Tonight we are here to start the process of annexing a new housing tract into each of the Districts. The tract is the Village at Ruddy Creek development located on the southeast corner of Feather River Avenue and 18th Street. The improvements to be maintained in the Ruddy Creek tract are similar to the improvements already being maintained in the Districts
In order to annex Ruddy Creek into the Districts, there are certain legal requirements we must follow. The requirements for annexing into the BAD and the LLMAD are identical and include the following steps:
1. Adopt a City Council Resolution to Initiate Proceedings
2. Create and adopt an Engineer’s Report for the Annexation
3. Send Assessment Ballot(s) and Notice(s) to all property owners in the Annexation
4. Conduct a Public Hearing
98 Item 7.
5. Tabulate returned Assessment Ballots
6. Adopt a City Council Resolution Ordering the Annexation Steps 1 and 2 above are being presented tonight. Should the City Council decide to move forward with the Annexations, Step 3 will be completed within the next week. The remaining steps will be addressed at a future next Council meeting, currently scheduled for February 15, 2022.
The requirements for annexing into the CFD’s include the following steps:
1. Adopt a City Council Resolution Announcing Intent to Annex
2. Send Property Owner Ballot(s) and Notice(s)
3. Conduct a Public Hearing
4. Tabulate returned Ballots
5. Adopt a City Council Resolution of Annexation
6. Adopt a City Council Resolution Announcing Results of a Ballot Procedure Step 1 above is being presented tonight. Should the City Council decide to move forward with the Annexations, Step 2 will be completed within the next week. The remaining steps will be addressed at a future next Council meeting, currently scheduled for February 15, 2022.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City. Districts are designed to pay for themselves and there should be no impact on the City’s General Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Adopt Resolution No.-9015, Resolution of Initiating Proceedings for the Annexation of Territory into the Consolidated Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
2. Adopt Resolution No.9016, Resolution of Initiating Proceedings for the Annexation of Territory into the Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
3. Adopt Resolution No.9017, Resolution Declaring Intention to Annex Territory into the Consolidated Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
4. Adopt Resolution No.9018, Resolution Declaring Intention to Annex Territory into the Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
5. Adopt Resolution No.9019, Resolution Announcing Intent to Annex Territory into Community Facilities District 2006-1 and Community Facilities District 2006-2
ATTACHMENTS
Resolutions
Preliminary Engineer’s Reports
Sample Ballots & Notices
99 Item 7.
CITY OF OROVILLE
RESOLUTION NO. 9015
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY INTO THE CONSOLIDATED LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Oroville (the "City"), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Division 15, Part 2 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Act"), desires to initiate proceedings for the annexation of territory (the “Annexation”) into the City’s Consolidated Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District (the "District"), and to levy and collect annual assessments for parcels within the Annexation commencing in Fiscal Year 2022/23, to pay for the operation, maintenance, and servicing lighting and landscaping improvements and related services, including all appurtenant facilities related thereto; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, proceedings for the annexation of territory into an assessment district shall be initiated by resolution and that resolution shall generally describe the improvements to be maintained within the Annexation and order the engineer to prepare and file a report; and
WHEREAS, the City has retained Harris & Associates for the purpose of assisting with the Annexation, the establishment of annual assessments, and to prepare and file reports with the City Clerk concerning the Annexation, and the proposed annual levy of assessments in accordance with the Act and the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID (the "Constitution"); and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Oroville:
Section 1 That the foregoing recitals are true and correct; and Section 2 That the City proposes to annex the development known as the “Village at Ruddy Creek” into the District, and to levy and collect annual assessments within the Annexation commencing in Fiscal Year 2022/23 to pay for the operation, maintenance, and servicing of local landscape and lighting improvements, including all appurtenant facilities related thereto; and Section 3 That the Annexation, as described in the Report, consists of the lots and parcels of land that will receive special benefits from the improvements and services provided and are within boundaries of the City. Refer to the Report for a more complete description of these lots and parcels of land. Said Report is made part of this Resolution; and
Section 4 That the improvements for which the Annexation is proposed to be assessed generally include, but are not limited to, landscaping and street lighting improvements; and Section 5 That Harris & Associates is designated by this Council as the Engineer of Work for the Annexation and is hereby directed to prepare and file with the City, an Engineer's Report concerning the Annexation to the District and the annual levy of assessments in accordance with the requirements of the Act.
100
Item 7.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Oroville City Council at a regular meeting held on January 4, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Chuck Reynolds, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
Scott Huber, City Attorney Jackie Glover, Assistant City Clerk 101
Item 7.
CITY OF OROVILLE
RESOLUTION NO. 9016
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY INTO THE CONSOLIDATED BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Oroville (the "City"), pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Section 5 of the California Government Code, beginning with Section 54703 (the "Act"), desires to initiate proceedings for the annexation of territory (the “Annexation”) into the City’s Consolidated Benefit Assessment District (the "District"), and to levy and collect annual assessments for parcels within the Annexation commencing in Fiscal Year 2022/23 to pay for the operation, maintenance, and servicing of drainage and storm water improvements and related services, including all appurtenant facilities related thereto; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, proceedings for the annexation of territory into an assessment district shall be initiated by resolution and that resolution shall generally describe the improvements to be maintained within the Annexation and order the engineer to prepare and file a report; and
WHEREAS, the City has retained Harris & Associates for the purpose of assisting with the Annexation, the establishment of annual assessments, and to prepare and file a report with the City Clerk concerning the Annexation, and the proposed annual levy of assessments in accordance with the Act and the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID (the "Constitution"); and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Oroville:
Section 1 That the foregoing recitals are true and correct; and Section 2 That the City proposes to annex the development known as the “Village at Ruddy Creek” into the District, and to levy and collect annual assessments within the Annexation commencing in Fiscal Year 2022/23 to pay for the operation, maintenance, and servicing of drainage and storm water improvements and services, including all appurtenant facilities related thereto; and Section 3 That the Annexation, as described in the Report, consists of the lots and parcels of land that will receive special benefits from the improvements and services provided and are within boundaries of the City. Refer to the Report for a more complete description of these lots and parcels of land. Said Report is made part of this Resolution; and
Section 4 That the improvements for which the Annexation is proposed to be assessed generally include, but are not limited to, drainage and storm water improvements; and Section 5 That Harris & Associates is designated by this Council as the Engineer of Work for the Annexation and is hereby directed to prepare and file with the City, an Engineer's Report concerning the Annexation to the District and the annual levy of assessments in accordance with the requirements of the Act.
102
Item 7.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Oroville City Council at a regular meeting held on January 4, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Chuck Reynolds, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
Scott Huber, City Attorney Jackie Glover, Assistant City Clerk 103
Item 7.
RESOLUTION NO. 9017
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OROVILLE DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX TERRITORY INTO THE CITY’S CONSOLIDATED LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS THEREIN, COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2022/23
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Oroville ("City"), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Division 15, Part 2 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Act") did by previous resolution, initiate proceedings for the annexation of territory (the “Annexation”), into the City’s Consolidated Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District (the "District"), and to levy and collect annual assessments for the Annexation commencing in Fiscal Year 2022/23 to pay for the operation, maintenance, and servicing of local landscape and lighting improvements, including all appurtenant facilities related thereto; and WHEREAS, the City has retained Harris & Associates as the Engineer of Work for the purpose of preparing and filing an Engineer's Report ("Report") with the City Clerk concerning the Annexation and the proposed annual levy of assessments in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 1, Article 4 of the Act and the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID (the "Constitution"); and WHEREAS, the City desires and intends to annex the development known as the “Village at Ruddy Creek” into the District, to levy and collect annual assessments for the Annexation commencing in Fiscal Year 2022/23 to pay for the operation, maintenance, and servicing of the local landscape and lighting improvements, including all appurtenant facilities related thereto; and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Oroville:
1. That the foregoing recitals are true and correct.
2. That the Report prepared by Harris and Associates, attached hereto and incorporated as part of this Resolution, consists of the following:
A Description of the Improvements (Plans and Specifications), The Method of Apportionment that details the method of calculating the proportional special benefits and the annual assessment obligation for each affected parcel including a description of an "Assessment Range Formula" applicable to subsequent assessments,
The Estimate of Cost and Expenses to provide the improvements and services that establishes the proposed "Maximum Assessment Rate" and first year's assessments, An Assessment/Annexation Diagram,
An Assessment Roll containing the assessment to be levied for each Assessor Parcel Number within the Annexation, commencing in Fiscal Year 2022/23 based on the assessment rate and method of apportionment described therein. 104
Item 7.
3. That the Annexation as described in the Report consists of the lots and parcels of land that will receive special benefit from the improvements and services to be provided and are within boundaries of the City of Oroville. Refer to the Report for a more complete description of these lots and parcels of land. Said Report is made part of this Resolution.
4. That the improvements for which the Annexation is proposed generally include, but are not limited to, street lighting and landscaping.
5. That Notice is hereby given that a public hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council on Tuesday, February 15, 2022, at 5:15 P.M., or as soon thereafter as feasible, in the City Council Chambers, located at, 1735 Montgomery Street, Oroville, CA. At the Public Hearing, all interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard.
6. That City Clerk or their designee is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and mail notice of the Public Hearing and property owner Official Assessment Ballot to the subject property owners regarding the proposed Annexation, levy of the assessments and the assessment range formula outlined in the Engineer's Report, pursuant to Article XIIID of the California Constitution and Government Code section 53753.
7. That the Official Assessment Ballot proceeding conducted for the Annexation shall constitute the property owner's approval or rejection of the proposed levy of assessments, assessment range formula and Annexation into the District. Each landowner may return the ballot by mail or in person to the City Clerk not later than the conclusion of the Public Hearing on Tuesday, February 15, 2022. After the close of the Public Hearing, the City shall tabulate the ballots returned to determine if majority protest exits.
The ballots shall be weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of each affected property.
Majority protest exists if, upon the conclusion of the hearing, ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment.
8. The assessments are proposed to be levied annually. If the proposed assessments are approved and confirmed by the City Council, the assessments may increase in future years by an amount equal to the annual (February to February) percentage increase of the Local Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) for All Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Area. In each subsequent year in which the assessments will be levied, an updated Engineer’s Report, including a proposed budget and assessment rate, shall be prepared.
105
Item 7.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Oroville City Council at a regular meeting held on January 4, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Chuck Reynolds, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
Scott Huber, City Attorney Jackie Glover, Assistant City Clerk 106
Item 7.
CITY OF OROVILLE
RESOLUTION NO. 9018
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX TERRITORY INTO THE CITY’S CONSOLIDATED BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS THEREIN, COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Oroville ("City"), pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Section 5 of the California Government Code, beginning with Section 54703 (the "Act") did by previous resolution, initiate proceedings for the annexation of territory (the “Annexation”) into the City’s Consolidated Benefit Assessment District (the "District"), and to levy and collect annual assessments for parcels in the Annexation commencing in Fiscal Year 2022/23, to pay for the operation, maintenance, and servicing of local drainage and storm water improvements and related services, including all appurtenant facilities related thereto; and WHEREAS, the City has retained Harris & Associates as the Engineer of Work for the purpose of preparing and filing an Engineer's Report ("Report") with the City Clerk concerning the Annexation and the proposed annual levy of assessments in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 1, Article 4 of the Act and the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID (the "Constitution"); and WHEREAS, the City desires and intends to annex the development known as the “Village at Ruddy Creek” into the District, to levy and collect annual assessments within the Annexation commencing in Fiscal Year 2022/23 to pay for the operation, maintenance, and servicing of the local drainage and storm water improvements and related services, including all appurtenant facilities related thereto; and
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Oroville:
1. That the foregoing recitals are true and correct.
2. That the Report prepared by Harris and Associates, attached hereto and incorporated as part of this Resolution, consists of the following:
A Description of the Improvements (Plans and Specifications), The Method of Apportionment that details the method of calculating the proportional special benefits and the annual assessment obligation for each affected parcel, including a description of an "Assessment Range Formula" applicable to subsequent annual assessments,
The Estimate of Costs and Expenses to provide the improvements and services that establishes the proposed "Maximum Assessment Rate" and first year's assessments,
An Assessment/Annexation Diagram,
An Assessment Roll containing the assessment to be levied for each Assessor Parcel Number within the Annexation commencing in Fiscal Year 2022/23, based on the assessment rate and method of apportionment described therein. 107
Item 7.
3. That the Annexation as described in the Report consists of the lots and parcels of land that will receive special benefit from the improvements and services to be provided and are within boundaries of the City of Oroville. Refer to the Report for a more complete description of these lots and parcels of land. Said Report is made part of this Resolution.
4. That the improvements for which the Annexation is proposed generally include, but are not limited to, drainage and storm water improvements and related services.
5. That Notice is hereby given that a public hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council on Tuesday, February 15, 2022, at 5:15 P.M., or as soon thereafter as feasible, in the City Council Chambers, located at, 1735 Montgomery Street, Oroville, CA. At the Public Hearing, all interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard; and
6. That City Clerk or their designee is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and mail notice of the Public Hearing and property owner Official Assessment Ballot to the subject property owners regarding the proposed Annexation, levy of the assessments and the assessment range formula outlined in the Engineer's Report, pursuant to Article XIIID of the California Constitution and Government Code section 53753.
7. That the Official Assessment Ballot proceeding conducted for the Annexation shall constitute the property owner's approval or rejection of the proposed levy of assessments, assessment range formula and Annexation into the District. Each landowner may return the ballot by mail or in person to the City Clerk not later than the conclusion of the Public Hearing on Tuesday, February 15, 2022. After the close of the Public Hearing, the City shall tabulate the ballots returned to determine if majority protest exits.
The ballots shall be weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of each affected property.
Majority protest exists if, upon the conclusion of the hearing, ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment.
8. The assessments are proposed to be levied annually. If the proposed assessments are approved and confirmed by the City Council, the assessments may increase in future years by an amount equal to the annual (February to February) percentage increase of the Local Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) for All Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Area. In each subsequent year in which the assessments will be levied, an updated Engineer’s Report, including a proposed budget and assessment rate, shall be prepared.
108
Item 7.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Oroville City Council at a regular meeting held on January 4, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Chuck Reynolds, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
Scott Huber, City Attorney Jackie Glover, Assistant City Clerk 109
Item 7.
CITY OF OROVILLE
RESOLUTION NO. 9019
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DECLARING INTENT TO ANNEX TERRITORY INTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-1 (WESTSIDE PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES) COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-2 (WESTSIDE PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES), VILLAGE AT RUDDY CREEK
ANNEXATION AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES THEREIN THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:
WHEREAS, the Council has conducted proceedings for and has established the City of Oroville Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 (Westside Public Safety Facilities) and Community Facilities District No. 2006-2 (Westside Public Safety Services), the “Districts”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the “Act”), constituting Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing with Section 53311, of the California Government Code; and, WHEREAS, under the Act, the Council, as the legislative body for the Districts, is empowered with the authority to annex territory to the Districts and to authorize the levy of special taxes therein, now desires to undertake proceedings to annex territory to the Districts and to authorize the levy of special taxes therein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED BY THE COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1 Findings. The Council finds that:
(a) The foregoing recitals are true and correct; and,
(b) Annexation and Levy of Special Taxes: The Council hereby finds and determines that public convenience and necessity require that territory be added to the Districts and the levy of special taxes authorized therein; and, (c) Name of Existing Districts: The name of the existing Districts are “City of Oroville Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 (Westside Public Safety Facilities)” and “Community Facilities District No. 2006-2 (Westside Public Safety Services)”; and, (d) Territory: The territory included in the original Districts area is as shown on the Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts, in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Butte (the “County Recorder:) to which map reference is hereby made;
The territory now proposed to be annexed to the Districts is shown on the Annexation Map No. 1 of the Districts on file with the City Clerk, the boundaries of which territory are hereby preliminarily approved and to which map reference is hereby made for further particulars.
The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause to be recorded said Annexation Map No. 1 of the Districts in the office of the City Clerk, at minimum, fifteen (15) days prior to the Public Hearing for said Annexation.
110
Item 7.
(e) Special Tax: Except to the extent that funds are otherwise available to the Districts to pay for the authorized improvements, a special tax sufficient to pay the costs thereof, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt property in the Districts (including the property being annexed thereto), will be levied annually within the Districts and collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, or in such other manner as the Council shall determine, including direct billing of the affected property owners. The rate and method of apportionment of the special tax among the parcels of real property within the Districts, as now in existence and following the annexation proposed herein, in sufficient detail to allow each landowner within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Districts to estimate the maximum amount such owner will have to pay, are described in Exhibit A to the Resolution of Intention; and,
(f) Public Hearing: Monday, February 15, 2022 at 9019 p.m., in the regular meeting place of the Council, City Hall, Council Chambers, 1735 Montgomery Street, Oroville, California, be, and the same are hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where the Council, as legislative body for the Districts, will conduct a public hearing on the annexation of territory to the Districts where all interested persons for or against the annexation of territory or the levying of special taxes within the territory proposed to be annexed will be heard and will consider and finally determine whether the public interest, convenience and necessity require said annexation of territory to the Districts and the levy of said special tax therein; and, (g) Notice of Hearing: The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be given by publication one time in a newspaper of general circulation in the area of the Districts. The publication of said notice shall be completed at least seven (7) days before the date herein set for said hearing. The notice shall be substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B to the Resolution of Intention.
Section 2 Intention. The Council declares that it intends to annex territory to the Districts and levy said special taxes therein.
Section 3 Public Hearing. The Council sets the Public Hearing for February 15, 2022.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Oroville City Council at a regular meeting held on January 4, 2022, by the following vote:
111
Item 7.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Chuck Reynolds, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
Scott Huber, City Attorney Jackie Glover, Assistant City Clerk 112
Item 7.
CITY OF OROVILLE
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR
CONSOLIDATED LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
VILLAGE AT RUDDY CREEK ANNEXATION – ZONE 18
JANUARY 2022
PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
22 Executive Park, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92614
www.weareharris.com
113
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Landscape & Lighting Maintenance Assessment District Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 18
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Statement of Assessment Engineer i
Plans and Specifications 1
Estimate of Costs 2
Method of Assessment 4
Appendix A – Annexation Diagram
Appendix B – Assessment Roll
Appendix C – Waiver and Consent
114
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Landscape & Lighting Maintenance Assessment District Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 18
i
STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
AGENCY: CITY OF OROVILLE
PROJECT: ANNEXATION OF THE VILLAGE AT RUDDY CREEK
CONSOLIDATED BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OROVILLE
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S ANNEXATION REPORT
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 22565 through 22574 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“1972 Act”), said Act being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution (“Proposition 218”), and direction from the City Council of the City of Oroville, I submit herewith the following Engineer’s Annexation Report (“Report”).
This Report provides for the annexation of the Village at Ruddy Creek development into the City’s Consolidated Benefit Assessment District, and establishes the Maximum Assessment to be levied in the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 2022 and ending on June 30, 2023, and continuing in all subsequent years, for this area to be known and designated as:
The Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 18
Consolidated Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District (Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer, submit the following Report consisting of the following three (3) parts and Appendices:
PART I
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
This part provides a general description of improvements proposed to be maintained and serviced in the Annexation. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file at the City offices. 115
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Landscape & Lighting Maintenance Assessment District Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 18
ii
PART II
ESTIMATE OF COSTS
This part contains the cost estimate to maintain and service the improvements to be installed for the Annexation, including incidental costs and expenses, for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
PART III
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
The method of apportionment of assessments, indicating the proposed assessment of the net amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements to be assessed upon the several lots and parcels of land within the Annexation in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels.
Appendices
Appendix A – Annexation Diagram
Appendix B – Assessment Roll
Appendix C – Waiver and Consent
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the costs and expenses of the Annexation have been assessed to the lots and parcels within the boundaries of the Annexation in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the services provided.
DATED this day of 2022
___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
State of California
116
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Landscape & Lighting Maintenance Assessment District Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 18
PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Purpose
The Annexation is proposed to provide certain improvements and services specifically within, and related to, the Village at Ruddy Creek development. As part of the District, parcels in the Annexation will be assessed for the annual costs to maintain and service the improvements (the "Improvements") listed below.
The plans and specifications for the Improvements, showing the general nature, location and the extent of the Improvements, are on file with the City and are by reference herein made a part of this report.
Location of the Annexation
The Village at Ruddy Creek is located on the southeast corner of Feather Avenue and 18th Street, north of the Ghianda Heights Unit #2 development. The Annexation will consist of 97 single-family residential lots when developed.
• Assessor Parcel Number(s) as of the date of this Report:
030-360-091 (6.27 acres) and 030-360-092 (17.70 acres)
Description of Improvements and Services
The District provides funding for the maintenance and servicing of the following Improvements and includes all appurtenant facilities, personnel and equipment required to properly maintain and service said Improvements:
• Landscape maintenance at the entrances of the tract, off 18th Street and Feather Avenue. • Street lighting within the interior of the tract.
• Sidewalks within the interior of the tract.
• Utilities – Water for landscaping improvements.
• Utilities – Electricity for streetlights and irrigation systems. • Irrigation Materials (sprinklers, lines, controllers, etc.) • Plant Materials (includes trees, shrubs, bushes and turf).
The assessments collected may also fund any and all incidental expenses in connection therewith, all as more particularly authorized pursuant to the 1972 Act.
117
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Landscape & Lighting Maintenance Assessment District Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 18
PART II –ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The Fiscal Year 2022-23 Estimated Budget for the Annexation is shown on the following page. Section 22569(a) of the 1972 Act provides that estimate of costs includes the total cost of improvements to be made for the year, being the total costs of constructing or installing all proposed improvements and of maintaining and servicing all existing and proposed improvements, including all incidental expenses. This may include an operating reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. 118
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Landscape & Lighting Maintenance Assessment District Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 18
DIRECT COSTS
Utilities – Water $550.00
Utilities – Electricity $500.00
Streetlight Maintenance $350.00
Sidewalks $250.00
Irrigation Materials $300.00
Plant Materials $500.00
Weed Abatement $2,500.00
Personnel – Parks & Trees $1,500.00
Personnel – Public Works $2,500.00
Direct Costs Sub-Total $8,950.00
INDIRECT COSTS
CLLMAD Annual Administration Fee $1,000.00
Maintenance Contracts $0.00
City Personnel/Parks & Trees/New Park Tech II $3,200.00 Truck/Equipment $625.00
County Administration Fee – $0.30 per parcel $29.10
Advertising $15.00
Rounding Adjustment $0.46
Indirect Costs Sub-Total $4,869.56
SUB-TOTAL COSTS $13,819.56
Contingency Reserve – 20 % of Total Costs $2,763.91
TOTAL COSTS $16,583.47
Estimated Reserve Fund Beginning Balance (7/1/2022) $0.00 2022-23 Reserve Contribution/Reduction $1,658.35
Estimated Reserve Fund Ending Balance (6/30/2023) $1,658.35 2022-23 TOTAL ASSESSMENT $18,241.82
Total Number of Assessable Parcels 97
2022-23 MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT PER PARCEL $188.06
119
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Landscape & Lighting Maintenance Assessment District Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 18
PART III – METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
Method of Assessment
The following is a brief description of the manner in which the annual assessments will be apportioned to each parcel in the Annexation and is consistent with the original method of assessment for the District.
General
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment Districts by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing of street lights and landscaping facilities.
Street and Highways Code Section 22573 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This section states:
The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment District may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.
The 1972 Act permits the designation of areas of benefit within any individual assessment District if "…by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvements." (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax."
In addition, Proposition 218 (Prop. 218), the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act" which was approved on the November 1996 Statewide ballot and added Article XIIID to the California Constitution, requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Prop. 218 provides that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. Prop. 218 also requires that publicly owned property which benefit from the improvements be assessed, unless that parcel can show no benefit from the improvements.
Special Benefit
Special Benefit from Landscape Maintenance
All parcels within the Annexation receive special benefit from Landscape Improvements. Trees, landscaping, hardscapes, ornamental structures and appurtenant facilities, if well maintained, confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon real property within the District by providing beautification, shade and positive enhancement of the community character, attractiveness and desirability of the surroundings. In addition, all of the aforementioned contributes to a specific increase in property desirability and a specific enhancement of the property within the District. 120
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Landscape & Lighting Maintenance Assessment District Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 18
Special Benefit from Street Lighting Maintenance
All parcels within the Annexation receive special benefit from Street Lighting Improvements. The special benefit from street lighting can be measured by increased safety to people and property, as well as the increased availability of lighting. The safety to people results in a special benefit to residential parcels because street lighting improves traffic safety during ingress to and egress from the property and creates a deterrent to crime against people on the property. The safety to property results in a special benefit to both residential and vacant non-developable parcels because street lighting operation, maintenance and servicing provides for the protection of buildings and personal property against crimes such as theft and vandalism.
It has been determined that the ongoing maintenance, servicing and operation of the Improvements provide no measurable benefit to properties outside the Annexation or to the public at large, but clearly provide distinct and special benefits to properties within the Annexation.
One hundred percent (100%) of the costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the Improvements, including incidentals and appurtenances, is of special benefit to parcels within the Annexation and shall be spread to all parcels within the Annexation in the same manner as established in the District for all other Zones.
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
The Method of Assessment outlines the formula by which property receiving special benefit from the improvements and services provided will be assessed annually. The Method of Assessment for the District and Annexation follows:
Each parcel within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the Improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of the Improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entirety of the costs of the maintenance, operation, and servicing of the Improvements.
The benefit formula used to determine the financial obligation for each parcel should be based on the improvements benefitting the parcels, as well as the use, or type, of each parcel as compared to other parcels that benefit from said improvements. One of the more common approaches to fairly distributing District costs to the benefitting parcels in maintenance districts such as this utilizes a methodology referred to as the Per Parcel method of apportionment. This method recognizes that each parcel within a particular Zone benefits equally from the Improvements. This is typical when all parcels within a Zone are single-family residential parcels.
The Annexation is comprised of single–family residential parcels (“SFR”) and as such, all are deemed to benefit equally from the Improvements. The “Total Assessment”, as shown on the Cost Estimate table, is divided equally among each assessable parcel within the Annexation, determining the annual assessment rate per parcel.
121
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Landscape & Lighting Maintenance Assessment District Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 18
ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA
It is generally recognized that most budgetary items will be impacted by inflation in future years. In accordance with the California Constitution, Section 53739 (b)(1), assessments “…may be adjusted for inflation pursuant to a clearly defined formula…” A formula for an inflationary adjustment is therefore included as part of the maximum assessment for the Annexation. Said inflationary adjustment is authorized by the City Council and approved by the property owner(s) at the time of annexation. The formula, as described below, allows for annual adjustments to the maximum assessments.
The initial maximum assessment rate for parcels in the Annexation is $188.06 per parcel. The initial maximum assessment rate shall be adjusted each subsequent fiscal year by the following Assessment Range Formula:
• The Maximum Assessment Rate allowed each fiscal year (the "Adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate") shall be based on the initial maximum assessment rate established in Fiscal Year 2022-23, adjusted annually by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward area, All Urban Consumers, ("CPI") for the month of February. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise or discontinue the preparation of such index, the City reserves the right to use such revised index or a comparable system to determine fluctuations in the annual cost of living. • Each fiscal year, the February CPI shall be applied to the Maximum Assessment Rate established the previous fiscal year to calculate the appropriate Adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate for the then current fiscal year.
• If the proposed Rate per parcel for the upcoming fiscal year is less than or equal to the Adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate established for that fiscal year, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment.
Beginning in the second fiscal year after the Annexation (2023-24) and each subsequent fiscal year, the Maximum Assessment Rate shall be recalculated and a new Maximum Assessment Rate shall be established, using the Assessment Range Formula described above. The initial Maximum Assessment Rate has been established as $188.06. As stated above, if the proposed annual assessment rate for any fiscal year does not exceed the Adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate established for that year, it is not considered an increased assessment under the terms of Proposition 218.
To impose a new assessment or increased assessment in excess of the Maximum Assessment Rate for the current fiscal year, as provided by the preceding Assessment Range Formula, the City must comply with the provisions of the California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 4c that requires a public hearing and certain protest procedures including mailed notice of the public hearing and property owner protest balloting. Property owners must approve the proposed new or increased assessment via a property owner protest balloting process before any such new or increased assessment can be imposed. A protest occurs when, at the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots opposed to the new or increased assessment outweigh the returned ballots in favor of the new or increased assessment, weighting those assessment ballots by the financial obligation of each parcel.
The definition of new or increased assessments includes any assessment which, 1) did not previously exist or, 2) exceeds a previously approved assessment amount or assessment range formula. Any assessment range formula must have been previously adopted by the agency and approved by the property owners in the area where the assessment is imposed.
122
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Landscape & Lighting Maintenance Assessment District Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 18
APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Below is the Assessment Diagram for the Annexation. Please note the lines and dimensions of each parcel, are shown on the assessor's maps at the County of Butte Assessor's Office. 123
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Landscape & Lighting Maintenance Assessment District Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 18
APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL
The FY 2022-23 Assessment Roll (at the time this Report was prepared) for the Annexation is shown below.
Specifics for each parcel are shown on the assessor's maps of County of Butte Assessor's Office.
APN
Unit/Lot
Number
Assessable
Parcels
2022-23
Maximum
Assessment Rate
Per Parcel
030-360-092 1 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 2 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 3 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 4 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 5 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 6 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 7 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 8 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 9 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 10 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 11 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 12 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 13 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 14 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 15 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 16 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 17 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 18 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 19 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 20 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 21 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 22 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 23 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 24 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 25 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 26 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 27 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 28 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 29 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 30 1.00 $188.06
124
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Landscape & Lighting Maintenance Assessment District Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 18
APN
Unit/Lot
Number
Assessable
Parcels
2022-23
Maximum
Assessment Rate
Per Parcel
030-360-092 31 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 32 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 33 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 34 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 35 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 36 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 37 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 38 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 39 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 40 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 41 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 42 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 43 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 44 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 45 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 46 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 47 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 48 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 49 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 50 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 51 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 52 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 53 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 54 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 55 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 56 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 57 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 58 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 59 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 60 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 61 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 62 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 63 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 64 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 65 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 66 1.00 $188.06
125
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Landscape & Lighting Maintenance Assessment District Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 18
APN
Unit/Lot
Number
Assessable
Parcels
2022-23
Maximum
Assessment Rate
Per Parcel
030-360-092 67 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 68 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 69 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 70 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 71 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 72 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 73 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 74 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 75 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 76 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 77 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 78 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 79 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 80 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 81 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 82 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 83 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 84 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 85 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 86 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 87 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 88 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 89 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 90 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 91 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 92 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 93 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 94 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 95 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 96 1.00 $188.06
030-360-092 97 1.00 $188.06
030-360-091 A 0.00 $0.00
TOTALS: 97.00 $18,241.82
126
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Landscape & Lighting Maintenance Assessment District Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 18
APPENDIX C – WAIVER AND CONSENT
Waiver and Consent to Annex
There is one property owner within the proposed boundaries of the Annexation. Said property owner has executed a “Waiver and Consent to Annex” allowing for the public hearing and ballot tabulation to be held on February 15, 2022. A signed copy of said waiver is below. 127
Item 7.
CITY OF OROVILLE
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR
CONSOLIDATED BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
VILLAGE AT RUDDY CREEK ANNEXATION – ZONE 9
JANUARY 2022
PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
22 Executive Park, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92614
www.weareharris.com
128
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 9
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Statement of Assessment Engineer i
Plans and Specifications 1
Estimate of Costs 2
Method of Assessment 4
Appendix A – Annexation Diagram
Appendix B – Assessment Roll
Appendix C – Waiver and Consent
129
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
Village at Ruddy Creek – Zone 9
i
STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
AGENCY: CITY OF OROVILLE
PROJECT: ANNEXATION OF THE VILLAGE AT RUDDY CREEK DEVELOPMENT
CONSOLIDATED BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF OROVILLE
COUNTY OF BUTTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S ANNEXATION REPORT
Pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Section 5 of the California Government Code, beginning with Section 54703 (the "1982 Act"), Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution (“Proposition 218”), and direction from the City Council of the City of Oroville, I submit herewith the following Engineer’s Annexation Report (“Report”).
This Report provides for the annexation of the Village at Ruddy Creek development into the City’s Consolidated Benefit Assessment District, and establishes the Maximum Assessment to be levied in the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 2022 and ending on June 30, 2023, and continuing in all subsequent years, for this area to be known and designated as:
The Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 9
Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
(Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer, submit the following Report consisting of the following three (3) parts and Appendices:
PART I
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
This part provides a general description of improvements proposed to be maintained and serviced in the Annexation. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file at the City offices. 130
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 9
ii
PART II
ESTIMATE OF COSTS
This part contains the cost estimate to maintain and service the improvements to be installed for the Annexation, including incidental costs and expenses, for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
PART III
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
The method of apportionment of assessments, indicating the proposed assessment of the net amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements to be assessed upon the several lots and parcels of land within the Annexation in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels.
Appendices
Appendix A – Annexation Diagram
Appendix B – Assessment Roll
Appendix C – Waiver and Consent
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the costs and expenses of the Annexation have been assessed to the lots and parcels within the boundaries of the Annexation in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the services provided.
DATED this day of 2022
___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
State of California
131
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 9
PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Purpose
The Annexation is proposed to provide certain improvements and services specifically within, and related to, the Village at Ruddy Creek development. As part of the District, parcels in the Annexation will be assessed for the annual costs to maintain and service the improvements (the "Improvements") listed below.
The plans and specifications for the Improvements, showing the general nature, location and the extent of the Improvements, are on file with the City and are by reference herein made a part of this report.
Location of the Annexation
The Village at Ruddy Creek is located on the southeast corner of Feather Avenue and 18th Street, north of the Ghianda Heights Unit #2 development. The Annexation will consist of 97 single-family residential lots when developed.
• Assessor Parcel Number(s) as of the date of this Report:
030-360-091 (6.27 acres) and 030-360-092 (17.70 acres)
Description of Improvements and Services
The District provides funding for the maintenance and servicing of the following Improvements and includes all appurtenant facilities, personnel and equipment required to properly maintain and service said Improvements:
• Flood control facilities including basins, channels, pipes, culverts, pumps, etc. • Storm water control facilities including inlets and manhole covers. • Masonry walls or fencing related to drainage improvements, including graffiti removal.
The assessments collected may also fund any and all incidental expenses in connection therewith, all as more particularly authorized pursuant to the 1982 Act.
132
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 9
PART II –ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The Fiscal Year 2022-23 Estimated Budget for the Annexation is shown on the following page. Section 54716 (3) of the 1982 Act provides that estimate of costs includes the total cost of improvements to be made for the year, being the total costs of constructing or installing all proposed improvements and of maintaining and servicing all existing and proposed improvements, including all incidental expenses. This may include an operating reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. 133
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 9
DIRECT COSTS
Detention Pond Maintenance $1,500.00
Masonry Walls/Fencing $1,000.00
Drainage Pipes 250.00
Pump Station Electricity 750.00
Direct Costs Sub-Total $3,500.00
INDIRECT COSTS
Maintenance Repairs & Contingency $500.00
City Personnel/Overhead $1,000.00
City Personnel/New Park Tech II $1,495.00
Truck/Equipment $1,495.00
CBAD Annual Administration Fee 725.00
Professional Fees 0.00
County Administration Fee – $0.30 per assessed parcel 29.10 Rounding Adjustment 0.60
Indirect Costs Sub-Total $5,244.70
SUB-TOTAL COSTS $8,744.70
Contingency Reserve – 20 % of Total Costs $1,748.94
TOTAL COSTS $10,493.64
Estimated Reserve Fund Beginning Balance (7/1/2022) $0.00 2022-23 Reserve Contribution/Reduction $1,049.36
Estimated Reserve Fund Ending Balance (6/30/2023) $1,049.36 2022-23 TOTAL ASSESSMENT $11,543.00
Total Number of Assessable Parcels 97
2022-23 MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT PER PARCEL $119.00
134
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 9
PART III – METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
Method of Apportionment
The following is a brief description of the manner in which the annual assessments will be apportioned to each parcel in the Annexation and is consistent with the original method of assessment for the District.
General
The 1982 Act permits the establishment of assessment Districts by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing of drainage and flood control facilities, streets and streetlights.
Street and Highways Code Section 22573 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This section states:
The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment District may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.
Section 54715 (b) of the 1982 Act permits the designation of areas of benefit within any individual assessment District, which requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax." In addition, Proposition 218 (Prop. 218), the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act" which was approved on the November 1996 Statewide ballot and added Article XIIID to the California Constitution, requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Prop. 218 provides that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. Prop. 218 also requires that publicly owned property benefitting from the improvements be assessed, unless that parcel can show no benefit from the improvements.
Special Benefit
Special Benefit from Drainage, Storm Water and Related Facilities All parcels within the Annexation receive special benefit from the drainage and storm water Improvements. The Improvements for which the properties will be assessed have been identified as necessary, were required as a part of the development plans specifically for the tract and are also in compliance with the development plans and General Plan of the City. As such, the continuing maintenance and servicing of the Improvements are strictly the obligation of the properties within the Annexation.
Although the Improvements may include drainage and/or storm water facilities that connect to similar facilities outside the Annexation’s boundaries, the construction, maintenance and operation of these Improvements are necessary for the development of properties within the Annexation. 135
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 9
It has been determined therefore, that the ongoing maintenance, servicing and operation of the Improvements provide no measurable benefit to properties outside the Annexation or to the public at large, but clearly provide distinct and special benefits to properties within the Annexation.
One hundred percent (100%) of the costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the Improvements, including incidentals and appurtenances, is of special benefit to parcels within the Annexation and shall be spread to all parcels within the Annexation in the same manner as established in the District for all other Zones.
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
The Method of Assessment outlines the formula by which property receiving special benefit from the improvements and services provided will be assessed annually. The Method of Assessment for the District and Annexation follows:
Each parcel within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the Improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of the Improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entirety of the costs of the maintenance, operation, and servicing of the Improvements.
The benefit formula used to determine the financial obligation for each parcel should be based on the improvements benefitting the parcels, as well as the use, or type, of each parcel as compared to other parcels that benefit from said improvements. One of the more common approaches to fairly distributing District costs to the benefitting parcels in maintenance districts such as this utilizes a methodology referred to as the Per Parcel method of apportionment. This method recognizes that each parcel within a particular Zone benefits equally from the Improvements. This is typical when all parcels within a Zone are single-family residential parcels.
The Annexation is comprised of single–family residential parcels (“SFR”) and as such, all are deemed to benefit equally from the Improvements. The “Total Assessment”, as shown on the Cost Estimate table, is divided equally among each assessable parcel within the Annexation, determining the annual assessment rate per parcel.
ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA
It is generally recognized that most budgetary items will be impacted by inflation in future years. In accordance with the California Constitution, Section 53739 (b)(1), assessments “…may be adjusted for inflation pursuant to a clearly defined formula…” A formula for an inflationary adjustment is therefore included as part of the maximum assessment for the Annexation. Said inflationary adjustment is authorized by the City Council and approved by the property owner(s) at the time of annexation. The formula, as described below, allows for annual adjustments to the maximum assessments. 136
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 9
The initial maximum assessment rate for parcels in the Annexation is $119.00 per parcel. The initial maximum assessment rate shall be adjusted each subsequent fiscal year by the following Assessment Range Formula:
• The Maximum Assessment Rate allowed each fiscal year (the "Adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate") shall be based on the initial maximum assessment rate established in Fiscal Year 2022-23, adjusted annually by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward area, All Urban Consumers, ("CPI") for the month of February. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise or discontinue the preparation of such index, the City reserves the right to use such revised index or a comparable system to determine fluctuations in the annual cost of living. • Each fiscal year, the February CPI shall be applied to the Maximum Assessment Rate established the previous fiscal year to calculate the appropriate Adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate for the then current fiscal year.
• If the proposed rate per parcel for the upcoming fiscal year is less than or equal to the Adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate established for that fiscal year, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment.
Beginning in the second fiscal year after the Annexation (2023-24) and each subsequent fiscal year, the Maximum Assessment Rate shall be recalculated and a new Maximum Assessment Rate shall be established, using the Assessment Range Formula described above. The initial Maximum Assessment Rate has been established as $119.00. As stated above, if the proposed annual assessment rate for any fiscal year does not exceed the Adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate established for that year, it is not considered an increased assessment under the terms of Proposition 218.
To impose a new assessment or increased assessment in excess of the Maximum Assessment Rate for the current fiscal year, as provided by the preceding Assessment Range Formula, the City must comply with the provisions of the California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 4c that requires a public hearing and certain protest procedures including mailed notice of the public hearing and property owner protest balloting. Property owners must approve the proposed new or increased assessment via a property owner protest balloting process before any such new or increased assessment can be imposed. A protest occurs when, at the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots opposed to the new or increased assessment outweigh the returned ballots in favor of the new or increased assessment, weighting those assessment ballots by the financial obligation of each parcel.
The definition of new or increased assessments includes any assessment which, 1) did not previously exist or, 2) exceeds a previously approved assessment amount or assessment range formula. Any assessment range formula must have been previously adopted by the agency and approved by the property owners in the area where the assessment is imposed.
137
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 9
APPENDIX A – ANNEXATION DIAGRAM
Below is the Assessment Diagram for the Annexation. Please note the lines and dimensions of each parcel, are shown on the assessor's maps at the County of Butte Assessor's Office. 138
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 9
APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL
The FY 2022-23 Assessment Roll (at the time this Report was prepared) for the Annexation is shown below.
Specifics for each parcel are shown on the assessor's maps of County of Butte Assessor's Office.
APN
Unit/Lot
Number
Assessable
Parcels
2022-23
Maximum
Assessment Rate
Per Parcel
030-360-092 1 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 2 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 3 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 4 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 5 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 6 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 7 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 8 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 9 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 10 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 11 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 12 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 13 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 14 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 15 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 16 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 17 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 18 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 19 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 20 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 21 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 22 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 23 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 24 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 25 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 26 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 27 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 28 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 29 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 30 1.00 $119.00
139
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 9
APN
Unit/Lot
Number
Assessable
Parcels
2022-23
Maximum
Assessment Rate
Per Parcel
030-360-092 31 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 32 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 33 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 34 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 35 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 36 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 37 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 38 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 39 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 40 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 41 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 42 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 43 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 44 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 45 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 46 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 47 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 48 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 49 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 50 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 51 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 52 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 53 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 54 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 55 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 56 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 57 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 58 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 59 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 60 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 61 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 62 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 63 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 64 1.00 $119.00
140
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 9
APN
Unit/Lot
Number
Assessable
Parcels
2022-23
Maximum
Assessment Rate
Per Parcel
030-360-092 65 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 66 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 67 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 68 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 69 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 70 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 71 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 72 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 73 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 74 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 75 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 76 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 77 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 78 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 79 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 80 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 81 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 82 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 83 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 84 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 85 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 86 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 87 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 88 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 89 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 90 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 91 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 92 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 93 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 94 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 95 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 96 1.00 $119.00
030-360-092 97 1.00 $119.00
030-360-091 A 0.00 $0.00
TOTALS: 97.00 $11,543.00
141
Item 7.
Engineer’s Annexation Report
Consolidated Benefit Assessment District
Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation – Zone 9
APPENDIX C – WAIVER AND CONSENT
Waiver and Consent to Annex
There is one property owner within the proposed boundaries of the Annexation. Said property owner has executed a “Waiver and Consent to Annex” allowing for the public hearing and ballot tabulation to be held on February 15, 2022. A signed copy of said waiver is below. 142
Item 7.
Signature of person completing assessment ballot Print name of person completing assessment ballot City Clerk OFFICIAL ASSESSMENT BALLOT
City of Oroville City of Oroville
1735 Montgomery Street Annexation Consolidated Benefit Assessment District Oroville, CA 95965 (Zone 9 – Village at Ruddy Creek)
Assessor’s Parcel Number: 030-360-091
Assessor’s Parcel Number: 030-360-092
Proposed Maximum Assessment: $11,543.00
The person completing and submitting this assessment ballot must be the record owner of the property identified above or the representative of the record owner of such property who is legally authorized to complete and submit this ballot for and on behalf of the record owner. Please see “Summary of Assessment Ballot Procedures” on the back of this ballot for assistance in filling out the ballot. If there are two or more property owners, only one needs to sign and return the ballot.
Please mark your ballot in ink. Do not use pencil.
Upon completion, fold the assessment ballot, place it in the return envelope and seal the envelope. Mail or deliver the assessment ballot to the address shown on the return envelope pursuant to the instructions on the back of this ballot.
Please see the “Summary of Assessment Ballot Procedures” on the back of this sheet.
For additional information about this Annexation into the District, please see the enclosed legal notice.
This is not a bill.
Please cut along this line, fold the ballot, seal in the provided envelope, and return to the City Clerk
PROPERTY OWNER ASSESSMENT BALLOT
Assessor’s Parcel Number: 030-360-091 & 030-360-092
Owner Name: Ruddy Creek Partnership, LLC
Maximum Assessment for this Parcel: $11,543.00
Yes, I am IN FAVOR of the proposed Annexation and assessment to pay for drainage and related facilities and services in Zone 9 of the Consolidated Benefit Assessment District.
No, I am OPPOSED to the proposed Annexation and assessment to pay for drainage and related facilities and services in Zone 9 of the Consolidated Benefit Assessment District.
The undersigned certifies under penalty of perjury that the undersigned is entitled to complete and submit this assessment ballot.
BALLOT
Ruddy Creek Partnership, LLC
ATTN: Charles LaFlamme
4575 6th Avenue
Corning, CA 96021
143
Item 7.
SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT BALLOT PROCEDURES
If you are the owner of the property described on the enclosed Assessment Ballot, or the authorized representative of the record owner, you may submit the enclosed Assessment Ballot to the City to support or oppose the Annexation. Please follow the instructions below to complete and return your Assessment Ballot.
1. Register your vote on the enclosed Assessment Ballot in favor or against the proposed Annexation by placing an “X” in the corresponding box.
2. Mark, sign and date your Assessment Ballot in pen. (Assessment Ballots received without a signature will not be counted.) Do not use pencil.
3. Place your completed Assessment Ballot into the provided return envelope, and seal the envelope.
4. Mail or personally deliver your Assessment Ballot to the City Clerk of the City of Oroville, 1735 Montgomery Street, Oroville, CA 95956.
5. The City must receive mailed Assessment Ballots by February 15, 2022. Postmarks will not be accepted.
6. Assessment Ballots must be received by the City Clerk prior to the close of the Public Hearing concerning the proposed Annexation on Tuesday, February 15, 2022, at the Oroville City Hall Council Chambers. Any Assessment Ballots received after the close of the Public Hearing cannot legally be counted.
7. Following the close of the Public Hearing, the City Clerk or designee will tabulate the Assessment Ballots received. The Assessment Ballots are weighted by the Assessment amount for each property. (Simplified, this means one vote per each dollar of Assessment.)
8. The proposed Annexation may be confirmed unless a majority protest exists. A majority protest exists if, upon the close of the Public Hearing, the monetary value of the Assessment Ballots submitted in opposition to the proposed Annexation exceeds the monetary value of the Assessment Ballots submitted in favor of the proposed Annexation.
9. If a majority protest exists, the proposed Annexation will not be approved.
10. If a majority protest does not exist, the proposed Annexation will be approved and the assessment may be levied beginning in Fiscal Year 2022/23.
11. Your Assessment Ballot is not confidential and may be subject to public disclosure.
The information in this notice and the accompanying materials were compiled and are distributed at public expense by the City of Oroville in compliance with Proposition 218. This information is presented in the public interest. It is not intended to influence or attempt to influence the actions of the property owners to cast Assessment Ballots in favor or against the proposed Annexation. 144
Item 7.
OFFICIAL BALLOT
SPECIAL LANDOWNER ELECTION
NUMBER OF VOTES ENTITLED TO BE CAST: 24 (23.97 acres)
CITY OF OROVILLE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-1
(WESTSIDE PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES)
THE VILLAGE AT RUDDY CREEK ANNEXATION
This official ballot is for a special landowner election. You must return this ballot prior to the close of the Public Hearing on Tuesday, February 15, 2022. You have two options for returning the ballot: First, you may mail it back to the office of the City Clerk of the City of Oroville, located at 1735 Montgomery Street. If you choose this option, please be aware that the ballot must be received by Tuesday, February 15, 2022.
Post marked envelopes received after that date cannot be accepted. Secondly, you may hand deliver the ballot, either to the office of the City Clerk, prior to 5:00 p.m. on the same day or you may hand it in at the Public Hearing.
To cast your ballot properly, please sign and mark “X” on the line after the word “Yes” or after the word “No”.
Please make only one choice. All marks otherwise made are forbidden and shall render the ballot void. If you wrongly mark, tear or deface the ballot, return it to the City Clerk’s office and request a replacement.
APN(s): 030-360-091 and 030-360-092
Land Owner(s): Ruddy Creek Partnership, LLC (Charles LaFlamme) Address: 4575 6
th Avenue
Corning, CA 96021
Declaration of Authorization
The undersigned certifies under penalty of perjury that he/she is entitled to complete and submit this waiver.
Signature of Land Owner(s) (or authorized representative) Printed Name
Date
BALLOT MEASURE: Shall the City of Oroville be authorized to annually levy a special tax on taxable parcels within Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 (Westside Public Safety Facilities), (the “District”) and specifically within the boundaries of the Ruddy Creek Annexation, in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax, as detailed in the “Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory” into the District – Ruddy Creek Annexation, and to Authorize the Annexation and Levy of Special Taxes Therein”, to be adopted by the City Council on February 15, 2022, to commence in Fiscal Year 2022/23 or later.
YES:
NO: 145
Item 7.
146
Item 7.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
City of Oroville
City Hall Council Chambers
1735 Montgomery Street
Oroville, California
Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 (Westside Public Safety Facilities) Community Facilities District No. 2006-2 (Westside Public Safety Services) The Village at Ruddy Creek Annexation
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at 5:15 p.m. on February 15, 2022, in the City Council Chambers of the City of Oroville City Council, 1735 Montgomery Street, Oroville, California, the City of Oroville City Council will conduct a public hearing for the annexation of territory into Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 (Westside Public Safety Facilities), and Community Facilities District No. 2006-2 (Westside Public Safety Services). This public hearing is in regards to the Ruddy Creek Annexation.
The special tax amount to be charged is as authorized by the original Rate and Method of Apportionment detailed in the formation report for each of the above-mentioned Districts, dated September 13, 2006.
Public Safety Facilities and Services include, fire suppression and law enforcement services, equipment, personnel and facilities. Funding will also include the costs of equipment replacement, maintenance and services related thereto. The property owner(s) has voted to approve the annexation.
At the time and place of the public hearing all interested persons will be afforded an opportunity to hear and be heard; the City Council will consider all oral statements and all written protests made or filed by any interested person.
BY ORDER OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL
Jackie Glover
Assistant City Clerk
City of Oroville
Publish once on Saturday, February 5, 2022
147
Item 7.
Notice to Property Owners and Assessment Ballot
For the Proposed Annexation to the Consolidated Benefit Assessment District This notice informs you, as the record owner of the property within the proposed Annexation to the District shown above that on January 4, 2022, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention in which it declared its intention to annex your property into the District, and has scheduled a Public Hearing concerning the proposed annexation. If the annexation is approved, assessment may be levied beginning in Fiscal Year 2022/23.
The Public Hearing will be held during a regular meeting of the City of Oroville City Council on:
February 15, 2022, at 5:15 p.m.
or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the City Council Chambers located at 1735 Montgomery Street, Oroville.
All interested persons are invited to attend the Public Hearing and express opinions on the matter of the proposed Annexation.
Persons who wish to submit an Assessment Ballot should mail or personally deliver it as shown below and in accordance with the directions provided on the back of the Assessment Ballot under “Summary of Assessment Ballot Procedures” included herein.
Mail Delivery: If by mail, place the Assessment Ballot in the mail in sufficient time to be received no later than February 15, 2022. If your Assessment Ballot is not received by this time, the Assessment Ballot will not be tabulated. Please mail the Assessment Ballot to the City Clerk, City of Oroville, 1735 Montgomery Street, Oroville, CA 95965. Please note that postmarks will not be accepted.
Personal Delivery: The Assessment Ballot can be personally delivered to the City Clerk on or before the close of the Public Hearing on February 15, 2022.
II. Assessment Information
1. Name of Assessment: Annexation into the Consolidated Benefit Assessment District, Zone 9 (Village at Ruddy Creek)
2. The Total Proposed Assessment for the Entire Annexation Area: $11,543.00
3. Duration of the Proposed Assessment: The proposed new Assessment for drainage maintenance and services will be levied annually until the City Council determines that the services provided are no longer necessary.
4. Reason for the Assessment: The proposed new Assessments shall be used to pay for maintenance, operations, servicing costs and associated district administrative costs for drainage and related improvements and services located in the Ruddy Creek development.
5. Calculation of the Assessment: The Assessment is proposed on all parcels that receive direct and special benefit from the drainage improvements and services.
The amount of the proposed Assessment was calculated based upon the proportional special benefit received by each parcel to be assessed. The exact method and formula of spreading the Assessment is set forth in the Assessment Engineer's Report for the Annexation to the Assessment District, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk.
The Assessment shown on the Assessment Ballot is the maximum amount that can be assessed commencing Fiscal Year 2022/23 and can be adjusted annually based on the February to February change in the Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Area (“CPI”). The actual Assessments levied in any fiscal year will be as approved by the City Council and may not exceed the maximum Assessment rate without receiving property owner approval for the increase.
6. Assessment Balloting Results: If 50% or more of the weighted Assessment Ballots returned support the Annexation to the Assessment District, the Assessment amount shown on the enclosed Assessment Ballot may be imposed. If a majority of the Assessment Ballots returned oppose the Annexation to the Assessment District, the Assessment will not be imposed.
Assessment Ballots are weighted proportionally by each parcel’s proposed Assessment amount. (This means 1 vote for each $1 of Assessment.)
III. Questions Regarding These Proceedings
If you have any questions about this process, please call Rick Clark of Harris & Associates at (949) 536-2526. 148
Item 7.
OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: SCOTT E. HUBER, CITY ATTORNEY
DAWN NEVERS, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
RE: AMENDMENT TO GROUND LEASE AGREEMENT WITH ROBERT M.
TAYLOR CORPORATION ESTABLISHING RENT FOR THE FIRST
OPTION PERIOD OF THE GROUND LEASE
DATE: JANUARY 4, 2022
SUMMARY
The Council will review and consider approving an amendment to a ground lease agreement with the Robert M. Taylor Corporation for first 15-year option period of the ground lease of the property located at the corner of Challenger Avenue and Chuck Yeager Way in Oroville. The proposed lease amendment will bring the ground lease to current market value for rent. In addition, the unused 4.12 acres portion of the ground lease will be returned to the City for future development purposes.
DISCUSSION
On January 1, 1987, the Council entered into a ground lease with Robert M. Taylor Corporation (“Lessee”) for the lease of 5.55 acres of property located at the corner of Challenger Avenue and Chuck Yeager Way in Oroville. The lease required the Lessee to construct a commercial office building “with the purpose of increasing job opportunities in the Oroville area.” The annual rent established was to be “one half of one percent of the assessed value of the land and improvements” with the rent being paid by the Oroville Redevelopment Agency, which was eliminated by state law several years ago. The original term of the lease was 35-years, with an additional three 15-year options. At the beginning of each option period, the parties are able to renegotiate the amount of rent due for the property.
The initial term of the lease will expire on December 31, 2021, and the first 15-year option period will begin on January 1, 2022. Pursuant to the terms of the lease, the parties met and negotiated a mutually agreed upon rental rate for the ground lease.
The amount of rent to be paid for the ground lease will be $10,000 per year in monthly payments of $833.33 for the 1.43 acre parcel closest to the corner of Challenger Avenue and Chuck Yeager Way in Oroville, as described in Exhibit A of the Lease Amendment. In addition, the Lessee will return the undeveloped 4.12 acre parcel, as descibed in Exhibit B of the Lease Amendment. This amendment to the ground lease 149
Item 8.
accomplishes the intent of the grant assurances entered into by the City with the FAA to capture market value for all leases. In addition, the return of the undeveloped property will allow the City to entertain future development in that area, to further generate revenue for the Airport.
The Council will consider approval of the Second Amendment to the Ground Lease with the Robert M. Taylor Corporation.
FISCAL IMPACT
The first 15-year option period of the ground lease would be for an annual rent of $10,000, paid in monthly installments of $833.33. There are two 15-year options remaining under the original lease. The rental value for the second and third 15-year options will be renegotiated prior to the commencement of those option periods.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 9008 – A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A SECOND
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF OROVILLE AND THE ROBERT M. TAYLOR CORPORATION - (Agreement No. 852-2).
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 9008
Second Amendment to Ground Lease Agreement
150
Item 8.
OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 9008
A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF OROVILLE AND THE ROBERT M. TAYLOR CORPORATION (Agreement No. 852-2)
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Oroville City Council as follows:
1. The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Second Amendment to Agreement Between the City of Oroville and the Robert M. Taylor Corporation. A copy is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.
2. The City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Oroville City Council at a regular meeting held on January 4, 2022 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Chuck Reynolds, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________________
Scott E. Huber, City Attorney Bill Lagrone, City Adminstrator 151
Item 8.
Agreement 855-2
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF OROVILLE AND THE ROBERT M. TAYLOR CORPORATION
(Agreement 852-2)
This Second Amendment (“Amendment”) dated January 3, 2022 is between the City of Oroville (“City”) and Robert M. Taylor Corporation (“Lessee”) with an effective date of January 1, 2022. The Agreement, including the prior amendment, are attached to this Amendment as Exhibit C. In consideration of the terms and conditions herein, the City and Lessee agree that the Agreement shall be amended as follows:
1. Lessee will retain possession of the portion of the commercial-light manufacturing park (“Premises”) where the current building is situated, approximately, 1.43 acres, along with the improvements serving the Premises, as more fully described in the legal description attached as Exhibit A to this Amendment. On January 31, 2022, Lessee agrees to surrender and return possession of all other leased premises to City, approximately 4.12 acres, which are more fully described in the legal description attached as Exbibit B to this Amendment.
2. The Parties agree to adjust the annual rent for the leased Premises to $10,000 per year, payable in monthly installments of $833.33, for the first option term (15 years), from the effective date of this Second Amendment.
3. Conflicts between the Agreement, and this Second Amendment shall be controlled by this Second Amendment. All other provisions within the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
CITY OF OROVILLE ROBERT M. TAYLOR CORPORATION
By: ______________ _________ By: _________________________ Chuck Reynolds, Mayor Its:
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
By: ________________________ By: _____________________________ 152
Item 8.
153
Item 8.
154
Item 8.
155
Item 8.
156
Item 8.
157
Item 8.
158
Item 8.
159
Item 8.
160
Item 8.
161
Item 8.
162
Item 8.
163
Item 8.
164
Item 8.
165
Item 8.
166
Item 8.
167
Item 8.
168
Item 8.
169
Item 8.
170
Item 8.
171
Item 8.
172
Item 8.
173
Item 8.
174
Item 8.
175
Item 8.
176
Item 8.
177
Item 8.
178
Item 8.
179
Item 8.
180
Item 8.
181
Item 8.
182
Item 8.
183
Item 8.
184
Item 8.
185
Item 8.
186
Item 8.
187
Item 8.
188
Item 8.
189
Item 8.
190
Item 8.
CITY OF OROVILLE
STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR REYNOLDS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: AMY BERGSTRAND, MANAGEMENT ANALYST III
BUSINESS ASSISTANCE/HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
RE: HOUSING PROGRAM FUND LOAN FOR VETERAN VILLAGE
APARTMENTS
DATE: JANUARY 4, 2022
SUMMARY
Council will consider approving a Housing Program Fund loan to Veteran’s Housing Develop Corporation (VHDC) for the development of Veteran Village Apartments, located on Mitchell Ave.
DISCUSSION
City staff received a request dated December 8, 2021, from Veterans Housing Development Corporation to develop Oroville Veteran Village, a 30 unit, permanent supportive, housing facility for homeless and at-risk veterans and their families. The project located on Mitchell Ave, behind the City of Oroville’s Corporation Yard located at 1275 Mitchell Ave., will include two phases of construction. The project will include two buildings of 30 units consisting of mostly one-bedroom units and a few 2-bedroom units, a community room, computer center, exercise room, outdoor lounge and grill areas, community garden with green scaping and parking. The residents will be chronically homeless, homeless, and disabled homeless veterans and their families.
Oroville Veteran Village will offer a comprehensive array of services, primarily provided by Nations Finest (NF), VHDC’s parent corporation. NF is a non-profit service provider that has served Norther California’s homeless, unemployed, and at-risk veterans for 50 years.
Additional services will be provided by the US Department of Veterans Affairs, the Butte County Veterans Services Office, Butte County Health and Human Services Department and veterans organizations and other community partners.
Service funding will come from a variety of grants secured by NF and by VA case management services provided pursuant to project-based, Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing vouchers (VASH) assigned to the project by the Housing Authority of the County of Butte.
Capital Funding will come from a state Veterans Housing and Homelessness Prevention program award, American Red Cross, City of Oroville Housing Program Funds, HOME grant funds, Butte County, land donation from the City of Oroville, grant from the Federal Home 191
Item 9.
Loan Bank AHP program and a grant from the Home Depot Foundation. Construction financing will be provided by Bank of America or FHA.
Loan terms are described below:
Loan Amount: $1,750,000
Interest Rate: The proposed loan will bear no interest from disbursement through and including the construction loan closing until the earlier of (i) the permanent loan conversion or (ii) the third (3rd) anniversary of the Projects construction loan closing, after which the outstanding principal balance of the loan will bear interest at a simple rate not to exceed three percent (3%) per year.
Maturity Date: The loan will mature in fifty-five years from the date of Certificate of Occupancy or equivalent issued by the City of Oroville.
Uses of the Loan Proceeds: The loan proceeds will be used to finance a portion of predevelopment, development, and construction costs of the Project.
Repayment Limited to Residual Receipts: Annual installments to repay the loan are limited to 20% of Residual Receipts generated by the project.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no General Fund Impact
A loan in the amount of $1,750,000 will be funded Housing Program Funds, Fund 221. The balance of this fund at of November 30, 2021, is $3,256,260.52
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 9011– A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE SECURITY
DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE HOUSING PROGRAM FUND LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,750,000 WITH VHDC FOR VETERAN VILLAGE APARTMENTS.
ATTACHMENTS
1- Resolution No. 9011
2- Letter from VHDC
192
Item 9.
CITY OF OROVILLE
RESOLUTION NO. 9011
A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE SECURITY DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE HOUSING PROGRAM FUND LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,750,000 WITH VHDC FOR VETERAN VILLAGE APARTMENTS.
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Oroville City Council as follows:
1. The Mayor is authorized and directed to execute the security documents associated with the Housing Program Fund loan in the amount of $1,750,000 with VHDC for Veteran Village Apartments.
2. The City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oroville at a regular meeting on January 4, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Chuck Reynolds, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
Scott E. Huber, City Attorney Jackie Glover, Assistant City Clerk 193
Item 9.
194
Item 9.
CITY OF OROVILLE
STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR REYNOLDS AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL
FROM: MATT THOMPSON, ACTING CITY ENGINEER
RE: PARCEL CREATION OF VETERANS HOUSING
DATE: JANUARY 4, 2022
SUMMARY
The Council may decide to create a parcel that in the future could be developed into housing for veterans.
DISCUSSION
The City has been working with the Veterans Housing Development Corporation to provide them a 3.91-acre portion of APN 035-250-002 with a 43-foot wide access easement. Other parts of the 6.42-acre parcel currently house the city’s corporation yard and a solar installation.
Under State law the Council may create a parcel by resolution. The Council may decide by resolution to create the parcel so that it is available to transfer at a later date. The resolution would also create an easement that will provide access to the new parcel. Any transfer of property would be subject to Council approval at that time. Creation of the parcel at this time will simplify the process administratively. Creation of the parcel at this time will have no impact on the activities of maintenance personnel.
FISCAL IMPACT
Creation of the parcel and easement will have no fiscal impact. Should the Council decide to convey the parcel to another party in the future, there will be a fiscal impact on the City’s real estate holdings.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council adopt Resolution No. 9020 that will create the parcel and easement, that directs staff to continue to work toward developing housing for veterans, and that directs staff to seek Council authorization for any conveyance of said parcel.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 9020
195
Item 10.
CITY OF OROVILLE
RESOLUTION NO. 9020
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA, CREATING A NEW PARCEL OF LAND AND AN EASEMENT.
WHEREAS, there is a critical need for more housing in Oroville; and WHEREAS, the lack of housing can have an adverse effect on our military veterans; and
WHEREAS, the City of Oroville is grateful to all our veterans; and WHEREAS, the City of Oroville is in possession of surplus land at the maintenance facility on Mitchell Avenue; and
WHEREAS, said surplus land could be developed into housing for our veterans, and
WHEREAS, veteran advocacy groups exist that have access to funding, possess the necessary skills, and are willing to partner with the City in the development of housing for veterans, and
WHEREAS, California Government Code 66410 etc. commonly known as the Subdivision Map Act (Map Act) governs the creation of parcels and the division of lands in the State of California; and
WHEREAS, Section 66428(a)(2) of the Map Act exempts a public entity from the requirement to record a parcel or subdivision map in order to create a parcel.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Oroville City Council as follows:
Section 1. By this resolution the Council of the City of Oroville does hereby create a new parcel of land as described in the attached Exhibit “A”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR VETERANS HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, and as depicted in the attached Exhibit “B” PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR
VETERANS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CITY OF
OROVILLE, BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
Section 2. By this resolution the Council directs staff to continue to work toward the development of this new parcel for veterans housing.
Section 3. By this resolution the Council directs staff to return to Council when it is time to convey the parcel to a suitable veterans housing organization and seek authorization for the conveyance. 196
Item 10.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oroville at a regular meeting on January 4, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Chuck Reynolds, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
Scott E. Huber, City Attorney Jackie Glover, Assistant City Clerk 197
Item 10.
CITY OF OROVILLE
STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR REYNOLDS AND COUNCIL
FROM: DAWN NEVERS, ASSISTANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
WES ERVIN, CITY PLANNER
RE: TASK ORDER WITH NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING TO DRAFT SMALLLOT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SOUTH OROVILLE AND ENVIRONS UNDER AGREEMENT NO. 3387
DATE: JANUARY 4, 2022
SUMMARY
The City of Oroville may consider approving a task order from NorthStar Engineering to draft small-lot development standards for South Oroville and other locations.
DISCUSSION
The Planning Department wishes to encourage new investment in South Oroville by creating more flexible development standards for the 638 lots in South Oroville that are zoned R-1 but are smaller than the minimum 5,000 square-foot R-1 lot size. Less strict lot coverage, setback, covered parking, alley access, manufactured home and other development standards may encourage new residential investment in the area. NorthStar Engineering has submitted a proposal for $12,840 to draft the new standards.
This project is part of the South Oroville revitalization strategy begun in 2019, which was paused during the pandemic, but which we intend to reactivate in 2022. A big part of the strategy is obtaining community input via forums and an advisory committee. Community input will help prioritize needs, complete rezoning, develop the small-lot standards, encourage reinvestment, and cooperatively mobilize for action.
The City Council approved an as needed services agreement with NorthStar on October 5, 2021.
FISCAL IMPACT
$4,745 of remaining SB2 grant funds would be used for this project, with the other $8,095 from the General Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve a contract with NorthStar Engineering for $12,840 to draft Small-lot development standards for South Oroville and other locations.
198
Item 11.
ATTACHMENTS
1. NorthStar Engineering proposal
199
Item 11.
December 20, 2021
Mr. Wes Ervin, Principal Planner
Community Development Department
City of Oroville
1735 Montgomery Street
Oroville, CA 95965
Subject: Task Order No. 2—Municipal Code Amendments Regarding Small Lot Development Standards Dear Mr. Ervin:
NorthStar is pleased to submit this proposal to provide amendments to Oroville’s Municipal Code regarding Small Lot Development Standards. The Scope of Work and Cost Estimates below provide the approach and estimated costs for this effort.
SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1 – Review Existing Code and Meet with Staff and Stakeholders NorthStar will review existing City regulations and meet with City staff and other stakeholdersto determine key issues and desired outcomes. Participation in two meetings with the South Oroville community are included.
Estimated Cost: $3,460
Task 2 – Prepare Draft Ordinance
NorthStar, in consultation with City Staff, will prepare a draft ordinance for review by the City Attorney’sOffice.
Comments on the draft document will be incorporated into a final draft consistent with the City’s format.
Estimated Cost: $3,865.
Task 3 – Prepare and Present Reports for Planning Commission and City Council NorthStar will prepare draft reports for City review, and produce a final document incorporating any City comments. These reports will be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council, and will include graphics to illustrate key concepts. Estimated Cost: $4,735.
TOTAL COST ESTIMATE
The scope of work will be completed on a time and materials basis. The total estimated cost to complete Task Order 2 is $12,480.
200
Item 11.
ASSUMPTIONS
• The City will provide NorthStar with template documents for the ordinance and staff reports. • The City will administer the public hearing notification process.
If this scope of work and cost estimate meet with your satisfaction, please execute this agreement and return it back to us via email.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. If you have any questions, please call me at (530) 893-1600, extension 213, or (530) 815-9164 to discuss.
Agreed and Accepted:
City of Oroville: NorthStar:
By:
Title:
Date:
By:
Title:
Date:
201
Item 11.
Task Order 2: Small-Lot Development Standards
Total
hrs $170 hrs $140 hrs $120 hrs $100 hrs $145 hrs $95 Amt. 15% Review Code/Background 2 $340 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $340
Meet with Staff/Stakeholders 16 $2,720 0 $0 $0 4 $400 $0 $0 $0 $3,120 $3,460
Review Current Legislation 1 $170 0 $0 $170
Prepare Draft Ordinance 20 $3,400 0 $0 $0 2 $200 $0 1 $95 $0 $3,695 $3,865
Commission/Council Reports 2 $340 0 $0 $0 12 $1,200 12 $1,740 1 $95 $0 $3,375 Meetings 8 $1,360 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,360
$4,735
4 Project Management 1 $170 1 $120 0 $680
$100
42 8,500 0 0 0 120 18 1,800 12 1,740 2 190 0 0
$12,840
Admin
Task Subtotal
Technical
Description Subconsultant
2 Draft Ordinance
Task
No.
Task Principal Senior Associate Assistant GIS-Architect Estimated Total for Required Tasks
1 Review of Existing City
Code and Meetings with
Staff/Stakeholders Task Subtotal
Subtotals
Reimbursable Expenses ( permit copies, FedEx postage, etc.) 3 Commission/Council
Reports and Meetings
Task Subtotal
202
Item 11.
CITY OF OROVILLE
STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR REYNOLDS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: AMY BERGSTRAND, MANAGEMENT ANALYST III
BUSINESS ASSISTANCE/HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
RE: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH TROVER
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT LLC
DATE: JANUARY 4, 2022
SUMMARY
The City Council may consider a Professional Services Agreement with Trover Construction Project Management LLC to perform owner-occupied rehabilitation contractor services for the City of Oroville Housing Rehabilitation Program in the amount of $130.00 per hour average (not to exceed $165.00 per hour), as needed. Additionally, under this contract, the contractor may be utilized for City maintenance projects as they arise.
DISCUSSION
The City has been unable to assist residents of the City of Oroville with Housing Rehabilitation since the last contract expired. The following is an example of the types of services that the Contractor would provide:
Conduct project evaluation of applicant’s property
Prepare Work Write-up
Conduct Bid Walk-Thru
Conduct and attend Bid Opening
Perform as liaison to work with selected general contractor, homeowner and city staff
Conduct Progress Payment Inspections
Submit Progress Payment Requests to Housing staff for processing Obtain Permits
Schedule necessary inspections (order Termite and Lead based paint inspections, city inspections)
Ensure all projects comply with current California Building Code Requirements Sign off on project Completion
Other Services, as needed.
203
Item 12.
A Request for Proposal was published on July 10, 2021, and again on October 9, 2021, requesting proposals from local licensed general contractors to assist the City as a liaison between the City, Borrower and Contractor by providing owner-occupied rehabilitation contractor services. The city received one (1) response for each Request for Proposal, from different firms. The first response did not pan out, and we were required by the state to put out another Request for Proposals. The second response is as follows:
Trover Construction Project Management LLC - $130.00 per hour average (not to exceed $165.00 per hour).
Fee Schedule as follows:
o Project Manager $165.00 per hour
o Assistant Project Manager $145.00 per hour
o Project Engineer/Coordinator $120.00 per hour
Staff is seeking authorization from Council to enter into an agreement with Trover Construction Project Management LLC, for a period of two (2) years. Contracting with Trover Construction Project Management LLC for a period of two years will ensure that City’s Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation Program may continue to service the targeted population.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funding will be provided from Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 20-CDBG12067 Account No. 7033-12067AD and CDBG Program Income Account No. 7071-4538453.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 9010 – A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH TROVER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT LLC IN THE AMOUNT OF $130.00 AND HOUR (NOT TO EXCEED $165.00 PER HOUR), TO PROVIDE REHABILITATION PROGRAM AS NEEDED – (Agreement No. 3396-1)
ATTACHMENTS
A – Resolution No. 9010
B – Agreement No. 3396-1
204
Item 12.
A-3396-1
AGREEMENT FOR REHAB CONTRACTOR SERVICES
This Agreement is made and entered into as of December 21, 2021, by and between the City of Oroville (“City”) and Trover Construction Project Management LLC (“Consultant”).
RECITALS
1. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent in various trades to serve as "Rehab Contractor" for the City of Oroville's Owner-occupied Rehabilitation Program. Consultant possesses the skills, experience, ability, license, background and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein.
2. City desires to retain Consultant to render professional services as set forth in this Agreement.
AGREEMENT
1. Scope of Services. The Consultant shall furnish the following types of services in a professional manner:
Conduct project evaluation of property
Prepare work write-up
Conduct bid walk-thru
Conduct and attend bid opening
Perform as a Liaison to work with the selected general contractor, homeowner and City staff.
Conduct Progress Payment inspections
Submit Progress Payment Requests to Housing staff on behalf of the selected contractor
Obtain permits
205
Item 12.
A-3396-1
Order termite and lead based paint inspections/reports Ensure all projects comply with current California Building Code Sign off on project Completion
Schedule inspections with City Building Department, as required Sign off on project completion
Other services, as needed.
2. Time of Performance. The services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue until December 21, 2023.
3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be $130.00 per hour average (not to exceed $165.00 per hour), or on a pre-determined fee for certain jobs. A fee schedule is as follows: Project Manager $165.00 an hour, Assistant Project Manager $145.00 an hour, Project Engineer/Coordinator $120.00 an hour. In no event shall Consultant’s compensation exceed the amount of $50,000 for the period of this agreement without additional written authorization from the City.
Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects in Consultant’s services, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment.
4. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit billings every two weeks to City describing the work performed during the preceding two weeks while on a project, or consultant may submit one request for payment when the project is complete.
Consultant’s bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff. 206
Item 12.
A-3396-1
5. Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of Consultant’s services, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without prior written authorization from City.
6. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by the City immediately for cause or by either party without cause upon fifteen days written notice of termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services properly performed up to the effective date of termination.
7. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notes and internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant’s expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents, and other writings to City within three (3) days after written request. Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer 207
Item 12.
A-3396-1
diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents and Data”). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a nonexclusive and perpetual license for any Documents and Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents and Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents and Data which may be provided to Consultant by City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk.
Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City’s name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Consultant’s 208
Item 12.
A-3396-1
services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant’s services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.
8. Consultant’s Books and Records.
1. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of four (4) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to this Agreement.
2. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum of four (4) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement.
3. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Administrator, City Attorney, City Finance Director, or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant’s address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement.
4. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost 209
Item 12.
A-3396-1
or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant’s business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained by City Hall.
9. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City. Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City’s employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights.
10. Lobbying. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
11. Interest of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates, and professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’s services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and 210
Item 12.
A-3396-1
represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.
Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:
1. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to its rendition of information, advice, recommendation, or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City or any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and
2. possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2).)
12. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be under the supervision of Department of Business Assistance/Housing Development in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant’s field of expertise.
13. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations.
14. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants 211
Item 12.
A-3396-1
to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are required by the City for its business.
15. Indemnity. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising from its performance of this Agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers.
16. Insurance Requirements.
Consultant, at Consultant’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the Agreement, the insurance coverage and policies as set forth in Exhibit “B” attached hereto.
17. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first-class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.
If to City: Bill LaGrone, City Administrator
c/o Amy Bergstrand
City of Oroville
1735 Montgomery Street
Oroville, CA 95965-4897
212
Item 12.
A-3396-1
If to Consultant: Trover Construction Project Management LLC 974 Forest Avenue
Chico, CA 95928
17. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations are superseded in total by this Agreement.
18. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
19. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express prior written consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the prior written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise required by law.
20. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a 213
Item 12.
A-3396-1
continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement.
21. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
22. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Butte.
23. Litigation Expenses and Attorney’s Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other part arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorney’s fees.
24. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and shall divide the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to American Arbitration Association (AAA) or its successor in interest. AAA shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by AAA and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation.
25. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the 214
Item 12.
A-3396-1
parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto.
In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.
26. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party.
27. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid, nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.
28. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer, and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, disability, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or 215
Item 12.
A-3396-1
recruitment advertising, layoff or termination.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.
CITY OF OROVILLE Trover Construction Project Management LLC
By: ___________________________ By:_____________________________ Chuck Reynolds, Mayor
Title: Independent Contractor _____
Business License #: 1081347
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
By: ____________________________ By:_____________________________ Scott E. Huber, City Attorney Jackie Glover, Assistant City Clerk Attachments: Exhibit A – CDBG Rehabilitation Program Guidelines Exhibit B -- Insurance Requirements
216
Item 12.
CITY OF OROVILLE
RESOLUTION NO. 9010
A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
TROVER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT LLC IN THE AMOUNT OF $130.00 PER HOUR AVERAGE (NOT TO EXCEED $165.00 AN HOUR), TO PROVIDE
REHABILITATION CONTRACTOR SERVICES FOR THE OWNER-OCCUPIED
REHABILITATION PROGRAM, AS NEEDED
(Agreement No. 3396-1)
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Oroville City Council as follows:
1. The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute a professional agreement with Trover Construction Project Management LLC to provide owner-occupied rehabilitation contractor services. A copy of the agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.
2. The City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Oroville City Council at a regular meeting held on January 4, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_______________________________
Chuck Reynolds, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
______________________________ _______________________________ Scott E. Huber, City Attorney Jackie Glover, Assistant City Clerk 217
Item 12.
218
Item i.
219
Item i.
220
Item i.
221
Item i.
222
Item i.
223
Item i.
224
Item i.
225
Item i.
226
Item i.
227
Item i.
228
Item i.
229
Item i.
230
Item i.
231
Item i.
232
Item i.
233
Item i.
234
Item i.