Agenda packet — Oroville City Council, June 17, 2025 (part 1 of 3)

June 17, 2025~4:00 PM Oroville City Council Meeting Agenda Page 1 of 9

OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers
1735 Montgomery Street
Oroville, CA. 95965
June 17, 2025

REGULAR MEETING
CLOSED SESSION 4:00 PM
OPEN SESSION 4:30 PM
AGENDA

PUBLIC ACCESS AND PARTICIPATION
Please review the options below for ways to participate or observe the Council Meetings.

To Observe the Meeting:

1. Live Feed: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAoRW34swYl85UBfYqT7IbQ/

2. Zoom Link: https://zoom.us/j/96870319529?pwd=dW9kMGRZSFo5MFFNQk5wVDUzRkRrZz09

3. Zoom Application: Meeting ID: 968 7031 9529 Passcode: 67684553

4. By Phone: Telephone: 1-669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 968 7031 9529 Passcode: 67684553 To Provide Comment to the Council:

1. Attend the meeting in person

2. Send an Email by 2:00 PM the day before the meeting to [email protected]. All comments emailed will be provided to the Council Members for their consideration.

If you would like to address the Council at this meeting, you are requested to complete the blue speaker request form (located on the wall by the agendas) and hand it to the City Clerk, who is seated on the right of the Council Chamber. The form assists the Clerk with minute taking and assists the Mayor or presiding chair in conducting an orderly meeting. Providing personal information on the form is voluntary. For scheduled agenda items, please submit the form prior to the conclusion of the staff presentation for that item. Council has established time limitations of three (3) minutes per speaker on all items and an overall time limit of thirty minutes for non-agenda items.

If more than 10 speaker cards are submitted for an item, the time limitation would be reduced to one and a half (1.5) minutes per speaker for that item. If more than 15 speaker cards are submitted for non-agenda items, the first 15 speakers will be randomly selected to speak at the beginning of the meeting, with the remaining speakers given an opportunity at the end. (California Government Code §54954.3(b)).

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, the Council is prohibited from taking action except for a brief response from the Council or staff to statements or questions relating to a non-agenda item.

CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
Council Members: Chuck Reynolds, Scott Thomson, Tracy Johnstone, Janet Goodson, Shawn Webber, Vice Mayor Eric Smith, Mayor David Pittman
1 June 17, 2025~4:00 PM Oroville City Council Meeting Agenda Page 2 of 9

CLOSED SESSION
The Council will hold a Closed Session on the following:

1. Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(2), the Council will meet with the City Administrator and City Attorney regarding potential exposure to litigation – Two cases.

2. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957, the Council will meet with the Personnel Officer to discuss Public Employee Performance Evaluations. Position Title: Department Heads and Contract Employees

OPEN SESSION

1. Announcement from Closed Session

2. Pledge of Allegiance

3. Adoption of Agenda

PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS

1. DEVELOPER PRESENTATION REGARDING THE FORMATION OF COMMUNITY

FACILITIES DISTRICTS
Introduction of a developer team proposing market-rate housing projects. The projects may require the formation of a Community Facilities District (CFD) to fund infrastructure and maintain affordability. The council will receive a presentation; no action is requested beyond direction to staff.

ACTION REQUESTED -

1. RECEIVE THE PRESENTATION FROM THE DEVELOPER TEAM; AND

2. PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF TO CONTINUE WORKING WITH THE DEVELOPER ON

THEIR PROPOSED HOUSING PROJECTS, INCLUDING ANALYSIS OF A POTENTIAL

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD) TO SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE, WITH ANY

FORMAL CFD PROPOSAL TO BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL.

2. FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY DISCUSSION
The City Council shall receive a presentation on the City’s fiscal sustainability.

ACTION REQUESTED -

RECEIVE PRESENTATION
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION – HEARING OF NON-AGENDA ITEMS
This is the time to address the Council about any item not listed on the agenda. If you wish to address the Council on an item listed on the agenda, please follow the directions listed above. 2 June 17, 2025~4:00 PM Oroville City Council Meeting Agenda Page 3 of 9

REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS

1. Council Announcements and Reports

2. Administration Reports

CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent calendar items 1 - 7 are adopted in one action by the Council. Items that are removed will be discussed and voted on immediately after adoption of consent calendar items.

1. HOMELESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SERVICES
The City Council shall consider entering into a three-year agreement to provide Homeless Management Information Services as described in the attached Memorandum of Understanding between Butte County’s Department of Employment and Social Services (DESS) and the City of Oroville.

ACTION REQUESTED -

ENTER INTO A THREE-YEAR AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE HOMELESS MANAGEMENT

INFORMATION SERVICES AS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN BUTTE COUNTY’S DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL SERVICES (DESS) AND THE CITY OF OROVILLE.

2. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH OROVILLE RESOURCE CENTER AND

RESCUE MISSION (ORC) FOR ESPERANZA VILLAGE
The City Council shall consider a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Oroville Resource Center and Rescue Mission (ORC) for the use of the City’s mobile restroom and shower trailer unit for the use at Esperanza Village for a period of three (3) years.

ACTION REQUESTED -
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 9384 – A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL

AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF

UNDERSTANDING WITH THE OROVILLE RESOURCE CENTER AND RESCUE MISSION (ORC) FOR THE USE OF THE CITY OF OROVILLE’S SHOWER TRAILER FOR ESPERANZA VILLAGE FOR A PERIOD OF THREE (3) YEARS.
3 June 17, 2025~4:00 PM Oroville City Council Meeting Agenda Page 4 of 9

3. APPLICATION FOR AIRPORT FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
The City Council shall consider authorization to accept and execute grant offers (once received) to complete the airport crack seal and marking upgrade projects for FY25–26.

ACTION(S) REQUESTED -

1. APPROVE THE ACCEPTANCE AND EXECUTION OF THE AIG GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $307,529.00 (ONCE OFFERED) FOR AIRPORT CRACK SEAL OF SOUTH TIEDOWN APRON, TEE HANGAR TAXILANES AND RUNWAY 13-31 MARKING UPGRADE.

2. APPROVE THE ACCEPTANCE AND EXECUTION OF THE AIP GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $244,321.00 (ONCE OFFERED) FOR AIRPORT CRACK SEAL OF TAXIWAY “L” AND NORTH TIEDOWN APRON

3. APPROVE APPLYING FOR, ACCEPTANCE AND EXECUTION OF THE STATE MATCHING GRANT FOR CRACK SEAL TAXIWAY “L” AND NORTH TIEDOWN APRON – DESIGN / CONSTRUCT – CALTRANS MATCHING GRANT OF $12,216.00

4. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BRANDLEY ENGINEERING INC. FOR,

ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING, AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR

THE OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
The City Council shall consider approving a five-year Professional Services Agreement with Brandley Engineering Inc., Consulting Airport Engineer (Brandley), for Architectural and Engineering Services for the Oroville Municipal Airport.

ACTION REQUESTED -
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 9386 – A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL

AUTHORING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BRADLEY ENGINEERING INC., AIRPORT CONSULTING ENGINEER,

FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES AT THE OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FOR FAA GRANT FUNDED PROJECTS – AGREEMENT NO. 3548.

5. APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACT FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES WITH ECORP CONSULTING, INC.

The City Council shall consider authorizing the Mayor to sign an on-call environmental services contract with ECORP Consulting, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $75,000.

ACTION REQUESTED -
APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE FOR MAYOR TO SIGN AGREEMENT NO. 3550 FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES WITH ECORP CONSULTING, INC.
4 June 17, 2025~4:00 PM Oroville City Council Meeting Agenda Page 5 of 9

6. CONSIDER AND APPROVE REVISED JOB DESCRIPTION FOR GEOGRAPHICAL

INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) SPECIALIST AND CONFIRM SALARY RANGE The City Council shall consider and adopt a revised job descriptions for GIS Specialist and confirm the salary range.

ACTION REQUESTED -

APPROVE THE ATTACHED JOB DESCRIPTION AND SALARY RANGE FOR THE POSITION OF GIS SPECIALIST.

7. APPROVAL OF JUNE 3, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES The City Council shall consider approving the regular meeting minutes of June 3, 2025.

ACTION REQUESTED -
APPROVE MINUTES AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN.

REGULAR BUSINESS

8. UPDATE OF USER AND REGULATORY FEES
The City Council shall consider adopting the attached resolution updating and establishing user and regulatory fees.

ACTION REQUESTED –
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 9387 ADJUSTING AND ESTABLISHING USER AND

REGULATORY FEES

9. NEW CONTRACT WITH CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE

PROTECTION (CAL FIRE) FOR FUTURE FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES AND COST

ANALYSIS
The City Council shall consider entering into either a new three year contract with CAL FIRE to extend fire protection services. Council shall also receive an analysis of the costs of the contract.

ACTION REQUESTED -
APPROVE CONRACT AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN.

10. ADOPTED BUDGET FOR 2025-26
The City Council shall receive the fiscal year 2025-26 Budget for Council adoption.

ACTION REQUESTED -
APPROVE THE 2025-26 ANNUAL BUDGET
5 June 17, 2025~4:00 PM Oroville City Council Meeting Agenda Page 6 of 9

11. COMMUNITY NAVIGATOR UPDATE
The City Council shall receive an update on the City of Oroville Community Navigator.

ACTION REQUESTED –
ACCEPT FOR INFORMATION.

12. HOUSING NAVIGATION SERVICES
The City Council shall consider entering into an agreement to provide Housing Navigation Services as described in the attached Memorandum of Understanding between Butte County’s Department of Employment and Social Services and the City of Oroville.

ACTION REQUESTED –
ENTER INTO THE 1-YEAR AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE HOUSING NAVIGATION SERVICES

DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN BUTTE COUNTY’S DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL SERVICES AND THE CITY OF OROVILLE.

13. POTENTIAL FEASIBILTY STUDY FOR THE DRAFT 2025 ANNEXATION STRATEGY FOR

THE CITY OF OROVILLE
The City Council shall consider authorizing staff to appropriate $49,425.00 to study the feasibility of a series of annexations around the edges of the city, and to develop a systematic plan for annexing those areas deemed feasible.

ACTION(S) REQUESTED -

1. RECEIVE A REPORT ON THE ATTACHED DRAFT 2025 ANNEXATION STRATEGY;

2. AUTHORIZE THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR $49,425 FOR THE FEASIBILITY STUDY;

3. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 9389; AND

4. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AND DIRECTION.

14. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF OROVILLE TO JOIN PIONEER

COMMUNITY ENERGY AND EXECUTE THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT The City Council shall consider providing direction to the City Administrator to execute the Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) for Pioneer Community Energy.

Execution of the JPA will allow the City of Oroville to become a Voting Member of the Pioneer Joint Powers Authority and participate in the Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) program administered by Pioneer.

ACTION REQUESTED -

DIRECT THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE THE AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT

POWERS AGREEMENT, ALLOWING THE CITY OF OROVILLE TO BECOME A VOTING MEMBER OF PIONEER COMMUNITY ENERGY.
6 June 17, 2025~4:00 PM Oroville City Council Meeting Agenda Page 7 of 9

15. EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT WITH JASON WINES FOR POSITION OF POLICE CHIEF The City Council shall consider entering into an employment contract with Jason Wines for the position of Police Chief with an annual compensation of $190,612.

ACTION REQUESTED -
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 9390 – A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL

AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF OROVILLE AND JASON WINES.

16. EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH ALYSSA STUTZ AS PUBLIC WORKS

DIRECTOR
The City Council shall consider entering into an employment contract with Alyssa Stutz for the position of Public Works Director with an annual compensation of $166,345.

ACTION REQUESTED –
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 9391 – A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL

AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF OROVILLE AND ALYSSA STUTZ.

17. BOLT ANTIQUE MUSEUM RESOLUTION
The City Council shall consider approval of a resolution regarding the continued operation and ownership of the Bolt Antique Tool Museum.

ACTION REQUESTED -

APPROVE THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION REGARDING THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE BOLT ANTIQUE TOOL MUSEUM.

18. PLACEMENT OF SOLID WASTE LIENS ON THE 2025-26 PROPERTY TAX ROLL The City Council shall consider the placement of solid waste liens from Recology on the 2025-26 property tax roll.

ACTION REQUESTED -
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 9385 – A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING DIRECT ASSESSMENT FOR DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE LIENS ON THE 2025- 2026 PROPERTY TAX ROLL AND AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT TO EXECUTE THE PROPOSITION 218 CERTIFICATION OF TAX BILL LEVY. 7 June 17, 2025~4:00 PM Oroville City Council Meeting Agenda Page 8 of 9

PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Public Hearing Procedure is as follows:
- Mayor or Chairperson opens the public hearing and staff will present the item and answer Council questions.
- The hearing is opened for public comment limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. In the event of more than ten (10) speakers, time will be limited to one and a half (1.5) minutes.

Under Government Code 54954.3, the time for each presentation may be limited. - Speakers are requested to provide a speaker card to the City Clerk - Public comment session is closed and then the Council will debate and take action - Those wishing to speak at the public hearings below, but unable to attend before 5pm, may request that the council consider holding the public hearing after 5pm by emailing [email protected] or calling 530-538-2535. Please submit request 24 hours before the meeting.
- Individuals may email comments for council consideration to [email protected]

19. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATION – ASSEMBLY BILL 2561 (AB 2561) Assembly Bill (AB) 2561, effective January 1, 2025, requires local agencies to present staffing data, such as vacancies, recruitment, and retention efforts, at least once per fiscal year and prior to budget adoption. The goal is to increase transparency and inform council before budget adoption is accepted.

ACTION REQUESTED -
ACCEPT FOR INFORMATION.

PUBLIC COMMUNICATION – HEARING OF NON-AGENDA ITEMS
This is the time to address the Council about any item not listed on the agenda. If you wish to address the Council on an item listed on the agenda, please follow the directions listed above.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS / CORRESPONDENCE

1. Future Agenda Items

2. Correspondence
i. Business Assistance and Housing Development Monthly Report – May 2025

ADJOURN THE MEETING
The meeting will be adjourned. A regular meeting of the Oroville City Council will be held on July 1, 2025 at 4:00 p.m.

Accommodating Those Individuals with Special Needs – In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Oroville encourages those with disabilities to participate fully in the public meeting process. If you have a special need in order to allow you to attend or participate in our public meetings, please contact the City Clerk at (530) 538-2535, well in advance of the regular meeting you wish to attend, so that we may make every reasonable effort to accommodate you. Documents distributed 8 June 17, 2025~4:00 PM Oroville City Council Meeting Agenda Page 9 of 9 for public session items, less than 72 hours prior to meeting, are available for public inspection at City Hall, 1735 Montgomery Street, Oroville, California.

Recordings - All meetings are recorded and broadcast live on cityoforoville.org and YouTube. 9

Page 1 ends

CITY OF OROVILLE

STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR PITTMAN & COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: PATRICK PIATT, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
RE: DEVELOPER PRESENTATION REGARDING THE FORMATION OF

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS
DATE: JUNE 17, 2025

SUMMARY
Introduction of a developer team proposing market-rate housing projects. The projects may require formation of a Community Facilities District (CFD) to fund infrastructure and maintain affordability. Council will receive a presentation; no action is requested beyond direction to staff.

DISCUSSION
The City is experiencing increased demand for market-rate housing to support workforce retention and future economic growth. A development team will present their vision for multiple housing projects aimed at meeting this demand through thoughtfully planned neighborhoods.

To make the homes attainable for working families while ensuring financial feasibility for the developer, the use of a Community Facilities District (CFD) is being proposed. This financing mechanism would allow infrastructure costs to be repaid over time through special tax assessments on future homeowners, rather than being fully embedded in the home sale price.

While this structure increases the annual tax obligation, it lowers the upfront home price and therefore reduces overall mortgage interest over the life of the loan at current interest rates. This can create more accessible monthly payments and help families qualify for financing.

Formation of a CFD requires City Council approval and will only move forward following detailed financial analysis by staff to confirm public benefit and long-term viability.

Tonight’s item is limited to an introduction of the developer and their proposed approach. 10 Item 1.

Page 2 ends

Staff will return at a later date with a full report and recommendations if a CFD is pursued.

FISCAL IMPACT
None at this time. Future fiscal impacts, if any, will be analyzed and presented to Council for consideration in connection with any formal CFD proposal.

ACTION REQUESTED -
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Receive the presentation from the developer team; and

2. Provide direction to staff to continue working with the developer on their proposed housing projects, including analysis of a potential Community Facilities District (CFD) to support infrastructure, with any formal CFD proposal to be brought back to the City Council for approval.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Developer Presentation
11 Item 1.

Community Facilities
District Financing
Overview
June 17, 2025
Municipal Advisory | Financial Planning | Pension Optimization City of Oroville
12 Item 1.

City of Oroville – Community Facilities District Financing Overview 06/17/2025 2 Legal Disclaimer and Disclosures
Ridgeline Municipal Strategies, LLC (Ridgeline) is not herein engaged in rendering legal, accounting, financial or other advisory services. This presentation is intended to provide accurate and authoritative general information and does not constitute advice, guidance or recommendation on any municipal security or municipal financial product.

Ridgeline and its advisors are registered as Municipal Advisors with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”). Our MSRB ID Number is K1294; our SEC ID Number is 867-02573. None of Ridgeline’ Associated Individuals have worked for a broker dealer within the past two years.

The MSRB is the primary rulemaking body for the municipal securities industry in general and municipal advisors in particular. Their website can be accessed at www.msrb.org. The website includes, among other things, the municipal advisory client brochure, which describes protections that are provided by the MSRB’s rules and the process for filing complaints with appropriate regulatory authorities. The client brochure can be accessed at https://www.msrb.org/~/media/Files/Resources/MSRB-MA-Clients-Brochure.ashx?la=en.

Ridgeline serves a wide variety of clients that may have interests that could have a direct or indirect impact on interests of other Ridgeline’ clients. For example, Ridgeline owes a fiduciary duty and duty of care a to each of its municipal clients. These clients may, from time to time and depending on specific circumstances, have competing interests. In acting in the interests of multiple clients, Ridgeline could potentially face a conflict of interest arising from such competing client interests. Ridgeline fulfills its regulatory duty and mitigates such conflicts through dealing honestly and with the utmost good faith with all of its clients.

Ridgeline represents that in connection with the issuance of municipal securities, we may receive compensation for our services from an Issuer or Obligated Person, which compensation is contingent upon the successful closing of a transaction and/or is based on the size of a transaction. Consistent with the requirements of the MSRB Rule G-42, Ridgeline hereby discloses that such contingent and/or transactional compensation may present a potential conflict of interest regarding our ability to provide unbiased advice to enter into such transaction. Ridgeline represents that this conflict of interest will not impair Ridgeline’s ability to render unbiased and competent advice or to fulfill its fiduciary duty to the Issuer.

If Ridgeline becomes aware of any additional potential or actual conflict of interest after this disclosure, we will disclose the detailed information in writing to the Issuer in a timely manner.

Ridgeline has never been subject to any legal, disciplinary or regulatory actions. Ridgeline’s most recent Form MA and each Affiliated Person’s most recent Form MA-I filed with the SEC may be accessed electronically at the following website: www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html. 13 Item 1.

City of Oroville – Community Facilities District Financing Overview 06/17/2025 3 What is a CFD?
• Community Facility Districts (CFD) are a method of financing public infrastructure, improvements, and certain services by imposing a “special tax” on real property in a limited
geographic area, without impacting existing residents
• Authorized by the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982
14 Item 1.

City of Oroville – Community Facilities District Financing Overview 06/17/2025 4 CFD Formation Considerations
• CFDs require 2/3 approval of voters as they constitute special taxes
• If there are less than 12 registered voters residing within a CFD, property owners are the voters
• CFDs are not affected by Proposition 218, because they are not “property based fees”
• CFD formation process generally takes 4-8 months
15 Item 1.

City of Oroville – Community Facilities District Financing Overview 06/17/2025 5 What can a CFD Fund?
• Public facilities with a useful life of 5+ years:
• Street improvements (including gutters, streetlights, etc.) • Water, sewer, storm drain improvements
• Parks, libraries, schools, childcare facilities, community centers, etc. • Development impact fees and planning / design costs for any of the above • A public agency must generally own these facilities
• Services and maintenance of public facilities
• On-going administrative costs of the CFD
16 Item 1.

City of Oroville – Community Facilities District Financing Overview 06/17/2025 6 CFD Bond Financing Overview
• Special taxes collected within the CFD are pledged for the repayment of the debt that financed construction of public facilities and infrastructure
• CFD Bonds are limited obligations of the CFD, payable SOLELY from the special taxes paid by property owners within the CFD • City has no financial liability for CFD bonds
17 Item 1.

City of Oroville – Community Facilities District Financing Overview 06/17/2025 7 Finance Team Members & Responsibilities
• Municipal Advisor
• Fiduciary to City
• Project / process management, extension of staff, market knowledge • Advice on bond structure
• Bond / Disclosure Counsel
• CFD Documentation: Formation, Disclosure (Official Statement), Financing Document • Tax-exempt opinion
• Special Tax Consultant
• Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax
• Initial CFD report
• Annual continuing disclosure and State reports
• Work with County on special tax levy on property tax roll 18 Item 1.

City of Oroville – Community Facilities District Financing Overview 06/17/2025 8 Next Steps
• Today – Direction to staff to explore CFDs
• Staff – Assemble financing team and identify preferred CFD path • CFD formation
• Bond issuance to support project development and fund public facilities and services
19 Item 1.
06/17/2025 9
Questions?
Dmitry Semenov
Ridgeline Municipal Strategies, LLC
(916) 250-1590
[email protected]
RidgelineMuni.com
20 Item 1.

CITY OF OROVILLE

STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR PITTMAN AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: RUTH DUNCAN, ASSISTANT CITY ADMINISTRATOR-ADMINISTRATIVE

SERVICES
RE: FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY DISCUSSION
DATE: JUNE 17, 2025

SUMMARY
The City Council shall receive a presentation on the City’s fiscal sustainability.

DISCUSSION
With the rising cost of regular operations and the decline in sales tax revenue the City is looking into the future ramifications of balancing the operating budget.

A follow-up discussion will be scheduled at a later date to discuss possible solutions and strategies for continued operations.

FISCAL IMPACT
None at this time.

RECOMMENDATION
Receive presentation

ATTACHMENTS
None
21 Item 2.

CITY OF OROVILLE

FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY PROJECT
JUNE 17, 2025
22 Item 2.
2 Executive Summary
 City’s General Fund Reserve is $9M+ (30%+ of expenses vs. 15% policy target)  However, the City’s annual deficit is projected to widen from $2M to $8M over the next 5 years; this will decrease the City’s General Fund balance
 Based upon current forecast, General Fund Reserve will be depleted by FYE 2029  Mismatch of slower recurring revenue growth rates and higher expense growth rates creates a widening structural deficit
 Forecast does not include any expenditures for capital or street maintenance  City has removed these expenditures to balance the FY 2026 budget  Proactive City implementation of cost management strategies will be essential to avoid abrupt and/or undesirable cuts to essential services
 Careful use of reserves to manage towards structurally balanced operations and lower cost, shorter lived assets
 Consider paying for continued investment in critical facilities and infrastructure with longer-term funding sources that match term of repayment with assets’ useful life  Utilizing Section 115 Trust to mitigate increases/volatility in pension costs 23 Item 2.
3 Sales and Use Tax

21.1%
1% District Sales Tax

18.0%
Property Tax

18.7%
Utility User Tax

11.1%
Franchise Fees

3.8% Transient
Occupancy Tax

2.7% Other Taxes

0.2%
Licenses

0.4% Permits

2.0%
Fines and Forfeitures

0.1%
Interest, Rents
and Concessions

7.4%
Intergovernmental
Revenues

4.0%
Charges for Service

1.7%
Other Revenues

4.3%
Operating Transfers In

4.3%
FY 2024-25 General Fund Projected Actual Revenues
 $26.0M Projected
Revenues
 $19.7M (76%) derived
from taxes
 Sales/Use Tax and
Property Tax are the
City’s largest revenue
categories
Source: City of Oroville
24 Item 2.
4 Trends in Core Revenues Streams
Property Taxes + Sales & Use Taxes
 Combined, Sales/Use
Tax and Property Tax
are ~60% of the
City’s total revenue
 Property Tax:

Compound annual
growth rate of 3%
 Sales and Use Tax:

Large annual
increases beginning
in FY 2019 from 1%
District Sales Tax
(Measure U,
approved by voters
in November 2018
 Trending downward
since FY 2022
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
$16
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 Millions
Property Taxes Sales and Use Taxes (Includes 1% District Sales Tax beginning in FY 2019) Source: City of Oroville
Plateau & Decline in Sales/Use Tax
25 Item 2.
5 FY 2024-25 General Fund Projected Actual Expenditures  $24.8M Projected Expenditures
 Largest expenditure categories:
 Salaries & Wages: $6.3M (25%
of total budget)
 Outside Services: $7.7M (31%
of total budget)
 Majority of this expense is for
the City’s fire service contract
with Cal Fire
 CalPERS (2.5%) is expected to
increase; currently lower due
to decrease in UAL from City’s
2021 POB
 Historically, CalPERS expenses
had been ~9% of City’s budget
Source: City of Oroville
Salaries & Wages

25.3%
CalPERS

2.5%
Workers Compensation
Insurance

1.0%
Group Health Insurance

4.7%
Other Employee
Benefits

0.2%
Overtime

3.1%
Operations &
Maintenance

2.6%
Liability Insurance

4.3%
Outside Services

31.1%
Other Services
& Supplies

6.7%
Software

2.0%
Utilities

2.7%
Transfers Out

8.7%
Debt Service

5.0%
26 Item 2.
6 $18
$20
$22
$24
$26
$28
$30
$32
$34
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24
Millions
Total Revenues Total Expenses
General Fund Revenues & Expenses
3-Year History
 City has been operating with a surplus for
two of the last three years, however onetime revenues, capital expenditures, and new recurring expenses impact the picture
 Revenue: One-time $3.5M in Miscellaneous
Revenue in FY 2022-23 (Local Fiscal Recovery
Funds)
 Expenses: $4M recurring outside services
began in FY 2022-23; not factored into FY
2021-22 (Cal Fire contract)
 $3M deficit in FY 2023-24 was a result of
one-time expenses (Corp Yard and Sr.

Apartment Complex) and lower revenues
(less Transfers In and Sales Tax)
 Dotted Green Line --- Revenues without onetime funds  Dotted Red Line --- Expenditures without CIP
Source: City of Oroville
Includes $3.5
of one-time
funds
Beginning of $4M
recurring expense
27 Item 2.
7 Trends in General Fund Balance and General Reserve
 City’s General Fund
balance has increased
6x since FYE 2014
 City has built up its
General Reserve, per its
policy (15% of General
Fund expenditures)
 $9.0M projected as of
FYE 2026 (~30% of
General Fund
expenses)
 Overall reserve levels
have been dropping
since FY 2023
 $22M in FY 2023 to
$19M in FY 2025 to
est. $16-17M for FY
2026
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
$16
$18
$20
$22
$24
FYE
2014
FYE
2015
FYE
2016
FYE
2017
FYE
2018
FYE
2019
FYE
2020
FYE
2021
FYE
2022
FYE
2023
FYE
2024
FYE
2025
FYE
2026
Millions
Committed
Unassigned
Assignments
Assigned - General Reserve
Minimum General Reserve Policy (15%)
Source: City of Oroville
28 Item 2.
8 General Fund Budget + Projection
Expenses Projected to Exceed Revenues
 General Fund deficit projected
to widen each year as
expenses grow more than
revenues
 Expenses in FY 2026 – FY 2030
do not include CIP or ongoing
street maintenance
 Salaries & Wages may end up
materially lower than
projected depending on
vacant positions
 Projected deficits impact
General Fund Balance 
($9M) by FYE 2030
 By FYE 2029, reserves are
extinguished, and the City
would no longer satisfy its
General Fund Reserve Policy
(15% of expenditures)
Source: City of Oroville
Key Revenue & Expense Annual Growth Rate Assumptions: Key Revenues: Sales and Use Tax (0%); 1% District Sales Tax (2%); Property Tax (3%); Utility User Tax (3%)
Key Expenses: Salaries & Wages (5%); Group Health Insurance (2%); Operations & Maintenance (2%); Outside Services (5%)
$19
$17
$12
$6
($1)
($9)
($10)
($5)
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
$40
FYE 2024-25 FYE 2025-26 FYE 2026-27 FYE 2027-28 FYE 2028-29 FYE 2029-30 Millions
General Fund Balance Minimum General Fund Reserve Policy Total Revenues Total Expenses
29 Item 2.
9 Headwinds for City’s Financial Health
CalPERS Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL)
 City’s UAL payment rising to
$1.5M by FY 2029
 More than 3x higher than FY
2025 payment
 City also has $16M of
outstanding Pension
Obligation Bonds (POBs)
 Issued in 2021 to restructure
$19M of UAL and 2007 POBs
at a 3.21% interest rate
 City has benefitted from
lower payments in FY 2023 to
FY 2025 due to 2021 POB and
strong CalPERS returns in FY
2021
 City has prudently leveraged
these savings to build up
$3.9M in its Section 115 Trust
$0.0
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
$3.0
201820192020202120222023202420252026202720282029203020312032203320342035203620372038203920402041204220432044 Millions
Projected Payments on
$14M of CalPERS UAL*
2021 POB: $16M outstanding
2007
POB
Source: CalPERS Actuarial Valuation Reports & CalPERS Pension Outlook Tool *Assumes FY 2023-24 investment returns of 9.5% and 6.8% thereafter. 30 Item 2.
10 $-
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
$3.0
20252026202720282029203020312032203320342035203620372038203920402041204220432044 Millions
Cost Management Strategy
Leveraging Section 115 Trust to Stabilize CalPERS UAL Payments  Assumptions:
 $3.9M balance from the Section 115 Trust
stays invested
 No additional deposits to the Trust
 4.5% long-term investment returns rate
 Funds could be withdrawn from the Trust
during higher payment years to reduce
impact to the General Fund
 In this example, withdrawals from the
Trust can reduce the General Fund’s UAL
payment by an average of $400K/year (up
to 7% of the annual projected General
Fund deficit)
 City also has approximately $4.5M of
internal reserves committed to pensions
 These could be allocated to the 115 trust
or to CalPERS directly to pay down UAL
Trust Withdrawals to Offset UAL Costs
2021 POB
UAL Payments*
Net Payments
Source: CalPERS Actuarial Valuation Reports & CalPERS Pension Outlook Tool *Assumes FY 2023-24 investment returns of 9.5% and 6.8% thereafter. 31 Item 2.
11 Headwinds for City’s Financial Health
Capital Improvements
 The City has capital improvement needs
beyond the expenditures included in the
General Fund financial forecast
 One of the largest needs is street improvements
 According to the City’s 2024-25 Pavement
Management Program (Harris & Associates), the
total need of the City is $155M through 2029
Source: City of Oroville; City of Oroville 2024-25
Pavement Management Program (Harris & Associates)
Oroville Pavement Management Program Needs
 City may consider financing most pressing street improvements:
 General Fund resources for improvements spread over useful life of asset vs using cash (pay-go)  Can address priority projects immediately, thus reducing accelerating streets deteoration 32 Item 2.
12 Takeaways and Follow-Up Considerations
 Like many agencies across the state, the City is facing a structural deficit based on slowing revenues and escalating personnel, insurance, energy and materials costs
 Based on current assumptions, reserves would be depleted over the next five years  This would be accelerated if reserves are used for any CIP/street projects  City should explore various strategies moving forward to ensure long term sustainability:
 Revenue enhancements
 Cost mitigation strategies (i.e. Section 115 Trust for pension smoothing)  CIP Funding Strategies (cash vs debt)
 Reserves optimization/allocation
33 Item 2.

Page 1 ends

CITY OF OROVILLE

STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR PITTMAN AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: RON BELSER, DIRECTOR OF CODE ENFORCMENT
RE: HOMELESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SERVICES
DATE: JUNE 17, 2025

SUMMARY
The City Council shall consider entering into a three-year agreement to provide Homeless Management Information Services as described in the attached Memorandum of Understanding between Butte County’s Department of Employment and Social Services (DESS) and the City of Oroville.

DISCUSSION
HMIS or Homeless Management Information System is a local web-based information technology system that the Continuum of Care (CoC) uses to collect client-level data and data on the provision of services to individuals and families who are experiencing homelessness or who are at imminent risk of homelessness.

The City of Oroville Community Navigator is responsible for contacting individuals experiencing homelessness or who are at risk of homelessness and connect these individuals to services managed by the Butte County Department of Employment and Social Services. To maintain proper date entry, client information, and case management, the Community Navigator is in need of this web-based system. This would also provide accuracy and open lines of communication to services provided by the Department of Employment and Social Services.

The purpose of this MOU is to confirm agreements between Contributing HMIS Organization (CHO) and County related to the City of Oroville’s participation in and management of the HMIS and Coordinated Entry System (CES) for the Butte Countywide Continuum of Care (CoC). As the HMIS Lead Agency for the CoC, County shall enter into participation agreements with CHOs. This MOU defines the roles and specific responsibilities of the Parties relating to the operation of CoC’s HMIS. 34 Item 1.

Page 2 ends

Butte County Department of Employment and Social Services would be responsible for:

A. Planning and Policy Development
1) Manage and maintain mechanisms for soliciting, collecting and analyzing feedback from end users, CHO HMIS Administrators, CHO program managers, CHO executive directors, and homeless persons;
2) Manage training and expand system functionality; and 3) Update HMIS Policies and Procedures to comply with federal regulations, HUD Standards, and the CoC Governance Charter, including: a. Chair the HMIS/CES Committee; and
4) Maintain the following plans consistent with requirements established by HUD, federal, State, local government and other funding sources, and review and update this plan with HUD regulations, notice, or guidance; 5) Data Quality Plan; and • Privacy and Security Plan
B. System Administration
1) Oversee the day-to-day administration of the HMIS system; 2) Manage relationship with the HMIS software vendor in accordance with the contract between the HMIS software vendor and County;
3) Ensure HMIS software meets the minimum data and technical functionality requirements established by HUD in rule or notice, including deduplication, data collection, maintenance of historical data, reporting (including HUD required reports and data quality and audit reports), and any other requirements established by HUD;
4) Ensure HMIS data processing capabilities, including the collection, maintenance, use, disclosure, transmission, and destruction of data, and the maintenance of privacy, security, and confidentiality protections; 5) Develop standard reports and queries of HMIS data (e.g., data quality report, CoC quarterly report, etc.);
6) Communicate updates to HMIS policies and procedures to all CHO HMIS Administrators; and
35 Item 1.

Page 3 ends

7) Update HMIS system as needed to reflect community needs.

The City of Oroville Community Navigator shall fulfill the following responsibilities:
1) Enter data into HMIS;
2) Ensure CHO compliance with the protocols of the HMIS Policy & Procedure, CES Policy and Procedure, Data Quality Plan, and Privacy and Security Plan. 3) Inform the HMIS Lead Agency when critical deadlines regarding data entry are missed;
4) Maintain communication with the HMIS Lead Agency regarding HMIS data entry challenges and questions;
5) Notify the HMIS Lead Agency within one business day when an End User is no longer employed by CHO and/or no longer needs access to HMIS, so their HMIS user account can be deactivated;
6) Complete training with the HMIS Lead Agency.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City of Oroville shall reimburse Butte County’s Department of Employment and Social Services up to a maximum compensation of twenty-three hundred and forty dollars ($2340.00) Under this MOU: $780.00 in FY 25/26, $780.00 in FY 26/27, and $780.00 in FY 27/28.

Funding to cover the program will come from the Opioids monies.

RECOMMENDATION

ENTER INTO A THREE-YEAR AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE HOMELESS

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SERVICES AS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN BUTTE COUNTY’S

DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL SERVICES (DESS) AND THE CITY OF OROVILLE.
36 Item 1.

Page 4 ends

ATTACHMENTS
A- Memorandum of Understanding between County of Butte Department of Employment and Social Services and City of Oroville for Homeless Management Information System.

B- Attachment II Description of Service
C- Attachment III Method and Rate of Payment
37 Item 1.

DESS.MOU.rev 4.15.2025 Page 1 of 13

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Between

BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL SERVICES And

CITY OF OROVILLE
For HOMELESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (HMIS)

ORGANIZATION PARTICIPATION
THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) is entered into as of July 1, 2025, by and between the County of Butte, Department of Employment and Social Services, herein referred to as “DESS” AND “HMIS Lead Agency” and the City of Oroville, herein referred to as “Contractor”, or “Contributing HMIS Organization (CHO)”, hereinafter referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties”. The purpose of this document is to set forth the types and terms of collaborative services for Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) Organization Participation between DESS and City of Oroville.

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, County is the HMIS Lead Agency and Contractor is an HMIS participating agency, pursuant to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) mandate for all communities and agencies receiving HUD Continuum of Care (CoC), Emergency Solutions Grant program (ESG), federal, State, local government and other program funding sources.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual covenants and conditions, the Parties hereto agree as follows:

1. PURPOSE
The purpose of this MOU is to confirm agreements between CHO and County related to participation in and management of the HMIS and Coordinated Entry System (CES) for the Butte Countywide Continuum of Care (CoC). As the HMIS Lead Agency for the CoC, County, shall enter into participation agreements with CHOs. This MOU defines the roles and specific responsibilities of the Parties relating to the operation of CoC’s HMIS.

Detailed information related to HMIS, the CoC, and definitions are set forth in Exhibit A, Background and Definitions, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein and as set forth by the HMIS Lead Agency and CoC.

2. TERM
The term of this MOU is July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2028.

3. FISCAL EXPLANATION
Cost of HMIS End User license(s) are the responsibility of the CHO and shall be paid to County as set forth in Attachment II, Method and Rate of Payment attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. The maximum amount payable to County shall not exceed two thousand three hundred and forty dollars ($2,340.00).

4. RESPONSIBILITIES
The responsibilities of DESS and CHO are set forth in Attachment I, Description of Services, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein and as set forth by HUD and the CoC.

5. TERMINATION
This MOU may be terminated by either Party upon the giving of thirty (30) days advance written notice of an intention to terminate.

6. NON-ASSIGNMENT
Neither Party shall assign, transfer or sub-contract this MOU nor their rights or duties under this MOU without the prior written consent of the other Party.

DRAFT
38 Item 1.

DESS.MOU.rev 4.15.2025 Page 2 of 13

7. RECORDS
Parties shall comply with all applicable federal, State, local government and other funded efforts to end homelessness and all laws, rules and regulations related to HMIS and CES shall be followed. Additionally, Parties shall comply with all decisions made by the CoC, HMIS/CES Committee, CoC, HMIS, and CES Policies and Procedures, Data and Privacy Plan, Data Quality Plan, and CoC Governance Charter, mentioned here by reference only.

8. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS/POLICIES
Parties shall comply with all applicable federal, State, local government and other funded efforts to end homelessness and all laws, rules and regulations related to HMIS and CES shall be followed. Additionally, Parties shall comply with all decisions made by the CoC, HMIS/CES Committee, CoC, HMIS, and CES Policies and Procedures, CoC Governance Charter, and HMIS/CES Privacy Plan, mentioned here by reference only.

The validity, interpretation and performance of this MOU shall be controlled by and construed under the regulatory laws set forth by both the federal government and the State of California.

CHO shall uphold relevant federal and State confidentiality regulations and laws that protect client records and shall adhere to the HMIS Data Uses and Disclosures outlined in the HMIS Policies and Procedures Manual section entitled, “HMIS Data Uses and Disclosures”, mentioned here by reference only.

A. Disclosure of Alcohol and/or Drug Abuse Records
CHO shall abide specifically by federal confidentiality regulations as contained in the Code of Federal Regulations, 42 CFR Part 2, mentioned here by reference only, regarding disclosure of alcohol and/or drug abuse records. In general terms, the federal regulation prohibits the disclosure of alcohol and/or drug abuse records unless disclosure is expressly permitted by written consent of the person to whom it pertains or as otherwise permitted by 42 CFR Part 2.

A general authorization for the release of medical or other information is not sufficient for this purpose. CHO understands the federal rules restrict any use of the information to criminally investigate or prosecute any alcohol or drug abuse patients.

B. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) CHO shall abide specifically, when applicable, with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and corresponding regulations passed by the U.S.

Department of Health and Human Services. In general, the regulations provide consumers with new rights to control the release of medical information, including the right: to give advance consent prior to disclosures of health information; to see a copy of health records; to request a correction to health records; to obtain documentation of disclosures of health information; to obtain an explanation of privacy rights and to be informed about how information may be used or disclosed. The current regulation provides protection for paper, oral and electronic information.

C. Medical, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse Information CHO shall abide by California State Laws and Federal Laws related to confidentiality and security of medical, mental health and substance abuse information as found in California State statutes, rules and regulations.

9. CONFIDENTIALITY
DESS and CHO shall act in strict conformance with all applicable Federal, State of California and/or local laws and regulations relating to confidentiality, including but not limited to, California Civil Code section 56 et seq., Welfare and Institutions Code sections 827, 5328 through 5330, 10850 and 14100.2, Health and Safety sections 11977 and 11812, 22 California Code of Regulations section 51009, and 42 Code of Federal Regulations sections 2.1 et seq. The Parties shall ensure that no list of persons receiving services under this MOU is published, disclosed, or used for any other purpose except for the direct administration of the program or other uses authorized by law that are not in conflict with requirements for confidentiality.

DRAFT
39 Item 1.

DESS.MOU.rev 4.15.2025 Page 3 of 13
DESS agrees, to the extent required by 42 U.S.C. 1320 et seq., Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), to comply with applicable requirements of law and subsequent amendments relating to protected health information (PHI).

CHO shall uphold relevant federal and State confidentiality regulations and laws that protect client records and shall adhere to the HMIS Data Uses and Disclosures outlined in the HMIS Policies and Procedures Manual section VI.3. HMIS Data Uses and Disclosures, mentioned here by reference only.

Participation in HMIS assumes participation in the sharing of data as described in this section.

However, in the event that a CHO cannot participate in the sharing of data, due to HIPAA regulations, or other regulations that require CHO to adhere to higher standards of confidentiality, they shall opt-out of this provision by indicating here they shall not participate. Such election shall be acknowledged by the HMIS Lead Agency.
______ ________ Initials here indicate that CHO shall not participate in the sharing CHO COUNTY of data due to HIPAA regulation or other regulation that require adherence to higher standards of confidentiality.

10. NON-DISCRIMINATION
During the performance of this MOU, the Parties shall not unlawfully discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment, or recipient of services, because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, medical condition, marital status, age or gender, pursuant to all applicable State and Federal statutes and regulations, as set forth in Attachment III, Assurance of Compliance, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.

11. RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES
It is understood that this is a MOU by and between two (2) separate public agencies and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create a relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association.

12. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES
Both DESS and CHO agree it is their specific intent that no other person or entity shall be a Party to or a third Party beneficiary of this MOU or an attachment or addenda to this MOU.

13. INDEMNIFICATION
Both DESS and CHO agree to be responsible and assume liability for its own wrongful or negligent acts or omissions, or those of its officers, agents, or employees to the full extent required by law.

14. NOTICE
Any and all notices, reports or other communications to be given to DESS or CHO shall be given to the persons representing the respective Parties at the following addresses:

Department of Employment and Social Services
Name: Elisa Rawlinson
Title: Senior Health and Human Services Program Analyst Address: 765 East Avenue, Suite 200, Chico, CA 95926
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (530) 552-6204
City of Oroville
Name: Ron Belser
Title: Code Enforcement Director
Address: 2055 Lincoln Street, Oroville, CA 95966
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 530.538.2448
DRAFT
40 Item 1.

DESS.MOU.rev 4.15.2025 Page 4 of 13

15. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
Both Parties are aware that this MOU and any documents provided to the other Party related only to this MOU may be subject to the California Public Records Act and may be disclosed to members of the public upon request. It is the responsibility of both Parties to clearly identify information in those documents that it considers to be confidential under the California Public Records Act. To the extent that the Parties agree with that designation, such information will be held in confidence whenever possible. All other information will be considered public.

Parties are aware that any information entered into HMIS and CES are not subject to the California Public Records Act, and may not be disclosed to members of the public.

16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT AND MODIFICATION
This MOU contains the entire agreement of the Parties relating to the subject matter of this MOU and supersedes all prior agreements and representations with respect to the subject matter hereof. This MOU may only be modified by a written amendment hereto, executed by both Parties. If there are attachments attached hereto, and a conflict exists between the terms of this MOU and any attachment, the terms of this MOU shall control.

17. ENFORCEABILITY AND SEVERABILITY
The invalidity or enforceability of any term or provisions of this MOU shall not, unless otherwise specified, affect the validity or enforceability of any other term or provision, which shall remain in full force and effect.

18. DISPUTES
DESS and CHO agree to use good faith efforts to resolve any disputes prior to bringing any action to enforce the terms of this MOU.

If CHO disagrees with any element of this MOU, it shall make every effort to address and resolve those issues with the HMIS Lead Agency. If the HMIS Lead Agency and CHO are unable to reach a solution, either party may raise the issue to the HMIS/CES Committee for a solution. The HMIS/CES Committee may recommend a solution or may request that the Parties bring the issue to the CoC Coordinator. The CoC Coordinator shall make every effort to recommend a solution that is amenable to the HMIS Lead Agency and CHO. However, if the issue cannot be adequately resolved at this level, the CoC Coordinator shall recommend a resolution that shall require final approval by the CoC Council.

Should it become necessary for a Party to this MOU to enforce any of the provisions hereof, the prevailing Party in any claim or action shall be entitled to reimbursement for all expenses so incurred, including reasonable attorney’s fees.

It is agreed by the Parties hereto that unless otherwise expressly waived by them, any action brought to enforce any of the provisions hereof or for declaratory relief hereunder shall be filed and remain in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Butte, State of California.

19. CAPTIONS
The captions of this MOU are for convenience in reference only and the words contained therein shall in no way be held to explain, modify, amplify or aid in the interpretation, construction or meaning of the provisions of this MOU.

20. OTHER DOCUMENTS
The Parties agree that they shall cooperate in good faith to accomplish the object of this MOU and, to that end, agree to execute and deliver such other and further instruments and documents as may be necessary and convenient to the fulfillment of these purposes.

21. CONTROLLING LAW
The validity, interpretation and performance of this MOU shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the State of California.

22. AUTHORITY
DESS and CHO and each Party’s signatory warrant and represent that each has full authority and capacity to enter into this MOU in accordance with all requirements of law. The DRAFT
41 Item 1.

DESS.MOU.rev 4.15.2025 Page 5 of 13
Parties also warrant that any signed amendment or modification to the MOU shall comply with all requirements of law, including capacity and authority to amend or modify the MOU.

23. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES
Each Party of this agreement agrees to the use of electronic signatures, such as digital signatures that meet the requirements of the California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act ((“CUETA”) Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1633.1 to 1633.17), for executing this agreement. The Parties further agree that the electronic signatures of the Parties included in this agreement are intended to authenticate this writing and to have the same force and effect as manual signatures. Electronic signature means an electronic sound, symbol, or process attached to or logically associated with an electronic record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the electronic record pursuant to the CUETA as amended from time to time. The CUETA authorizes use of an electronic signature for transactions and contracts among Parties in California, including a government agency. Digital signature means an electronic identifier, created by computer, intended by the party using it to have the same force and effect as the use of a manual signature, and shall be reasonably relied upon by the Parties. For purposes of this section, a digital signature is a type of "electronic signature" DRAFT
as defined in subdivision (i) of Section 1633.2 of the Civil Code. 42 Item 1.

DESS.MOU.rev 4.15.2025 Page 6 of 13

ATTACHMENT I

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
By execution of this contract, DESS agrees that any services provided by CHO from July 1, 2025, shall be in compliance with all language stated in this original contract, including all attachments.

County has been designated by the CoC to serve as the HMIS Lead Agency. As the HMIS Lead Agency, County is responsible for; managing HMIS data in compliance with federal, State, local government, other regulations and with HUD Standards, collecting and organizing HMIS data within a data management software program; and providing HMIS administrative functions at the direction of the CoC, through its CoC Council.

County and CHO shall operate the HMIS in compliance with the HEARTH Act, CoC Interim Rule, HMIS Proposed Rule, Butte CoC Governance Charter, HMIS Policies and Procedures Manual, HUD HMIS Technical Standards (last update: 2004), HUD HMIS Data Standards (last update: 2024), and other applicable laws, mentioned here by reference only. The Parties agree to update this MOU as needed in order to comply with any updates to these standards established in notices or other guidance, within the HUD-specified timeframe for such changes.

Unless indicated otherwise herein, Contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, transportation, supervision and management and pay all taxes required to complete the project described below.

CHO shall complete all work in the HMIS virtual platform, which shall be available to County, CHO, and approved staff via web-based software.

I. County Responsibilities
County authorized staff shall manage the data that is maintained in HMIS and have access to all data entered by CHOs. County staff shall only use the data for CoC purposes. Additionally, County shall fulfill the following responsibilities:

B. System Administration
1) Oversee the day-to-day administration of the HMIS system; 2) Manage relationship with the HMIS software vendor in accordance with the contract between the HMIS software vendor and County;
3) Ensure HMIS software meets the minimum data and technical functionality requirements established by HUD in rule or notice, including deduplication, data collection, maintenance of historical data, reporting (including HUD required reports and data quality and audit reports), and any other requirements established by HUD; 4) Ensure HMIS data processing capabilities, including the collection, maintenance, use, disclosure, transmission, and destruction of data, andthe maintenance of privacy, security, and confidentiality protections;
5) Develop standard reports and queries of HMIS data (e.g., data quality report, CoC quarterly report, etc.);
6) Communicate updates to HMIS policies and procedures to all CHO HMIS Administrators; and
7) Update HMIS system as needed to reflect community needs.

DRAFT
43 Item 1.

DESS.MOU.rev 4.15.2025 Page 7 of 13
C. Security
1) Retain copies of all contracts and agreements executed for HMIS administration;
2) Designate a Security Officer responsible for ensuring compliance with applicable security standards;
3) Require persons with access to all HMIS records to undergo a criminal background check and sign an End User Agreement, mentioned here by reference only; 4) Keep all signed statements for a period of at least 3 years; 5) Implement a policy and chain of communication for reporting and responding to security incidents; and
6) Complete an annual security review.

D. End User Training
1) Provide and/or coordinate technical assistance and support; 2) Document technical issues experienced by providers;
3) Develop and deliver a comprehensive and ongoing training curriculum and protocol that:
a. Includes instruction on client confidentiality and privacy, data security, data quality, and data entry into HMIS;
b. Requires participation of all CHO System Administrators; c. Is required for all HMIS End Users, including intake staff, data entry staff and reporting staff at all CHOs;
d. Is at a minimum offered every quarter;
e. Includes a mandatory virtual or classroom training for each End User before the End User is authorized to collect or use HMIS data; and f. Is conducted in a manner that assures every current End User completes a training update at least annually.

E. Data Quality and Compliance Monitoring
1) Consistent with the Data Quality Plan, mentioned here by reference only, establish data quality benchmarks for CHOs, including bed coverage rates, service-volume coverage rates, missing/unknown value rates, timeliness criteria, and consistency criteria;
2) Consistent with the Data Quality Plan, run and disseminate data quality reports on a quarterly basis to CHO programs indicating levels of data entry completion, consistency with program model, and timeliness;
3) Consistent with the Data Quality Plan, provide quarterly reports on HMIS participation rates, data quality and other analyses to the CoC Council and HMIS/CES Committee; and
4) Monitor compliance by all CHOs with HMIS participation requirements, policies and procedures, privacy standards, security requirements, and data quality standards through an annual review.

II. CHO Responsibilities
CHO shall fulfill the following responsibilities:
1) Enter data into HMIS;
2) Ensure CHO compliance with the protocols of the HMIS Policy & Procedure, CES Policy and Procedure, Data Quality Plan, and Privacy and Security Plan. 3) Inform the HMIS Lead Agency when critical deadlines regarding data entry are missed; 4) Maintain communication with the HMIS Lead Agency regarding HMIS data entry challenges and questions;
5) Notify the HMIS Lead Agency within one business day when an End User is no longer employed by CHO and/or no longer needs access to HMIS, so their HMIS user account can be deactivated;
6) Complete training with the HMIS Lead Agency.
7) Fulfill other Data Quality, Security, and Privacy responsibilities as described below.

DRAFT
44 Item 1.

DESS.MOU.rev 4.15.2025 Page 8 of 13
A. Data Quality
1) Enter client-level data into HMIS within three (3) days of client interaction; 2) Follow, comply, and enforce CHO Participation MOU;
3) Comply with all other data quality procedures as stipulated in the HMIS Policies and Procedures Manual, and the Data Quality Plan.

B. Security
1) Ensure that all End Users receive security training prior to being given access to HMIS, and once annually;
2) Only authorize HMIS use to End Users who need access to the system for regular and required data entry and/or system administration, as described in the HMIS Policies and Procedures Manual, mentioned hereby reference only. End Users shall complete the following before being granted access to HMIS:
a. Provide verification of a criminal background check; b. Read, initial, and sign the End User Agreement;
c. Read the HMIS Policies and Procedures Manual, the Privacy and Security Plan and the Data Quality Plan;
d. Complete a virtual or classroom training from County on how to use HMIS. 3) Establish physical security measures for CHO’s designated HMIS computers, laptops or other devices, under the direction of HMIS CHO Administrator. Ensureall computers, laptops or other devices designated for HMIS access are password protected. End Users must log out of the HMIS if they leave their workstation.

Passwords shall not be shared or stored in a readable format on the computer or server, and must be immediately changed if revealed or compromised. 4) Implement policies and procedures to ensure that information obtained from clients and entered into HMIS is used solely as provided for in this MOU and applicable laws. 5) Make information available to its authorized personnel on a “need-to-know” basis and only for the purposes authorized under this MOU. “Need -to-know” refers to those authorized persons who need information to perform their official duties in connection with the purpose described in this MOU.
6) Notify County of any unauthorized disclosure involving information in HMIS, no later than one (1) hour after an event is detected and cooperate with CoC and County in any investigation(s) of information security incidents. The notification must describe the incident in detail and provide contact information if different from the CHO Admin described herein. In the event of a security incident, contact County immediately at [email protected], [email protected] or call (530) 552-6204. 7) CHO shall maintain a record of all authorized users. The record must include the first/last name, work address, telephone number and e-mail address. The record must designate initial training date and date(s) annual trainings were completed. A copy of this record must be emailed to County within five business days of any addition or deletion of an authorized user, at [email protected]. 8) Protect HMIS information against unauthorized access, at all times. 9) Secure and maintain any computer systems, hardware, software, applications, and data that will be used in the performance of this MOU. This includes ensuring that all security patches, upgrades, and anti-virus updates are applied as appropriate to secure all information assets and date that may be used, transmitted or stored on such systems in the performance of this MOU.
10) Safeguard equipment to ensure non-HMIS users and public cannot access and/or view HMIS information. Safeguarding of equipment includes but is not limited to ensuring video terminals, printers, hard copy printouts or any other forms of HMIS related records are placed so that they may not be viewed by the public or other unauthorized persons.
11) Pursuant to this Agreement, End Users may only use information in HMIS to assist in administering their respective programs.
12) Access to HMIS shall be restricted to authorized End Users who need to perform their official duties to assist in the administration of their respective programs.

DRAFT
45 Item 1.

DESS.MOU.rev 4.15.2025 Page 9 of 13
13) End Users who access, disclose or use information contained in HMIS in a manner or for a purpose not authorized by this Agreement may be subject to civil and criminal sanctions contained in applicable federal and state statutes. 14) Comply with all other security protections as stipulated in the HMIS Policies and Procedures Manual and Security Plan, mentioned hereby reference only.

III. Both Parties Responsibilities
A. Privacy
1) Parties shall post the CoC’s HMIS Public Notice, mentioned here by reference only, in locations where HMIS data is being collected so that is viewable to all clients.
2) Parties shall offer a copy of the Privacy Notice, mentioned here by reference only, to clients, and provide a copy upon request. If an agency maintains a public web page, the agency must post the Privacy Notice on its web page. 3) Parties shall comply with all other privacy protections as stipulated in the HMIS Policies and Procedures Manual and the Privacy Plan, mentioned here by reference only.
4) Parties shall establish a regular process of training End Users on Privacy Plan compliance and regularly audit to ensure the Privacy Plan is being followed by CHO staff (including employees, volunteers, affiliates, contractors and associates). CHOs must review any complaints about potential violations of the Privacy Policy.
5) Parties shall ensure all clients complete an Informed Consent form, mentioned here by reference only, the forms are uploaded into HMIS and the client is entered into the system consistent with the chosen privacy level.

B. Accommodation of Limited English Proficiency
Parties shall provide a verbal explanation of the CoC’s HMIS and arrange, when possible, for a qualified interpreter or translator for an individual not literate in English or having difficulty understanding the Informed Consent form or other applicable documents or questions.

C. Illegal Activity
Parties shall not use HMIS with intent to defraud the federal, State or local government or an individual entity, or to conduct any illegal activity.

D. Data Sharing
Parties understand, the importance of adhering to privacy, confidentiality, and security protections related to personal data collected notwithstanding, it can be beneficial for parties other than CHO to receive data collected within the HMIS. The benefit of any data sharing is primarily intended for homeless persons in need of services from one or more service providers including CHOs. HUD encourages data sharing among providers within a CoC as sharing of HMIS information allows maximum benefits from such systems. From an operational perspective, it improves the ability of service provider staff to coordinate and deliver services to homeless clients. In these cases, the sharing of data would support the delivery of appropriate services. The data that this provision relates to is that information collected directly from individual clients. The definition of sharing shall be limited to that to which the HMIS/CES Committee has agreed. This includes: Personal Protected Information (PPI), historical dates for program enrollments and services, service notes, and case notes. Service notes include case management provided to clients related to programs in HMIS. Information sharing in HMIS is subject to the level of consent indicated on the Client’s signed Informed Consent form, mentioned hereby reference only, and cannot be overridden or changed by CHO.

This sharing of data collected does not include the aggregate data that is intended to support the work of the CoC to fulfill its purposes to efficiently coordinate services, improve community planning and to promote beneficial public policy. For this purpose, there is no need for access to DRAFT
46 Item 1.

DESS.MOU.rev 4.15.2025 Page 10 of 13
individual personal data. Requests for this information shall be documented and reviewed by the HMIS Lead Agency for approval if such provision is to be used to gauge progress in meeting CoC goals, to identify trends, or to inform strategy development. The HMIS Lead Agency shall inform the HMIS/CES Committee of such summary data requests.

It is important, therefore, for both Parties to agree that the sharing of data can occur within the parameters agreed to by the CoC and the HMIS/CES Committee in exercising its responsibility to provide system oversight. These parameters shall supplement the authority granted to CHO by the individual client to share personal information when completing the standard Informed Consent form. Participation in HMIS assumes participation in the sharing of data as described in this section.

E. Enforcement
The HMIS Lead Agency and/or HMIS/CES Committee shall investigate all potential violations of security or privacy protocols described in this MOU. The HMIS Lead Agency shall sanction any End User found to be in violation of such protocols, which could include suspension or revocation of HMIS Software System privileges. In addition, the HMIS Lead Agency may suspend or revoke CHO’s access to the HMIS Software System for serious and/or repeated violations of this MOU by CHO’s HMIS Administrator and/or End Users. The suspension or revocation of HMIS Software System access may include immediate termination of this MOU.

Maximum amount to be paid for the above-described services are not to exceed the amount identified on the variable information table which matches per “Attachment II – Method and Rate of Payment”.

DRAFT
47 Item 1.

DESS.MOU.rev 4.15.2025 Page 11 of 13

ATTACHMENT II

METHOD AND RATE OF PAYMENT
The contract maximum shall not exceed two thousand three hundred and forty dollars ($2,340.00).

CHO shall reimburse County for the cost of one (1) HMIS End User license, at a price of seven hundred and eighty dollars ($780.00), per license, per fiscal year.

Budget Details Quantity FY25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 Total End User License 1 $780.00 $780.00 $780.00 $2,340.00
Total $2,340.00
CHO shall make payments to DESS upon receipt of an approved Butte County Claim Form (mentioned here by reference only), submitted annually for services provided during the fiscal year.

CHO shall be invoiced annually. Payment is due and payable within thirty (30) days of CHOs receipt of the billing invoice and related documentation. A copy of the billing invoice and remittance shall be addressed and made payable to:

Butte County Department of Employment and Social Services Attention: Accounting Technicians
P.O. Box 1694
Oroville, CA 95965
Email: [email protected]
DRAFT
48 Item 1.

DESS.MOU.rev 4.15.2025 Page 12 of 13

ATTACHMENT III

ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE
WITH

THE BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL SERVICES

NONDISCRIMINATION IN STATE AND FEDERALLY

ASSISTED PROGRAMS
City of Oroville
HEREBY AGREES THAT it will comply with Title VI and VII of the CIVIL Rights Act of 1964 as amended; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended; the Food Stamp Act of 1977 as amended, and in particular Section 272.6; Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; California Civil Code, Section 51 et seq., as amended; California Government Code Section 11135-11139.5, as amended; California Government Code Section 12940 ©, (h) (1), (I), and (j); California Government Code, Section 4459; Title 22, California Code of Regulations 98000 –98413, and other applicable federal and state laws, as well as their implementing regulations (including 45 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 80,84, and 91, 7 CFR Part 15, and 28 CFR Part 42), by ensuring that employment practices and the administration of public assistance and social services programs are nondiscriminatory, to the effect that no person shall because of ethnic group identification, age, sex, color, mental disability, physical disability, medical condition, national origin, race, ancestry, marital status, sexual orientation of any person, religion, religious creed or political belief be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subject to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal or state financial assistance; and HEREBY GIVE ASSURANCE THAT it will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement.

THIS ASSURANCE is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all federal and state assistance; and THE VENDOR/RECIPIENT HEREBY GIVES ASSURANCE THAT administrative methods/procedures which have the effect of subjecting individuals to discrimination or defeating the objectives of the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) Manual of Policies and Procedures (MPP) Chapter 21 will be prohibited.

BY ACCEPTING THIS ASSURANCE, the vendor/recipient agrees to compile data, maintain records and submit reports as required, to permit effective enforcement of the aforementioned laws, rules and regulations and permit authorized CDSS and/or federal government personnel, during normal working hours, to review such records, books and accounts as needed to ascertain compliance. If there are any violations of this assurance, CDSS shall have the right to invoke fiscal sanctions or other legal remedies in accordance with Welfare and Institutions Code Section 10605, or Government Code Section 11135- 11139.5, or any other laws, or the issue may be referred to the appropriate federal agency for further compliance action and enforcement of this assurance.

The person or persons whose signatures appear below are authorized to sign this Assurance on behalf of the recipient.

THIS ASSURANCE is binding on the vendor/recipient directly or through contract, license, or other provider services, as long as it receives federal or state assistance.

Brian Ring, City Administrator Date
DRAFT
49 Item 1.

DESS.MOU.rev 4.15.2025 Page 13 of 13
IN WITNESSWHEREOF, the Parties hereto, by their duly authorized representative, have affixed their hands on the day and year first above written.

CITY OF OROVILLE

Brian Ring, City Administrator Date
City of Oroville

DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL SERVICES

Tiffany Rowe, Director Date
Department of Employment and Social Services
County of Butte
COUNTY

Sarah MacArthur, Deputy Director Date General Services

APPROVED AS TO FORM
Brad J. Stephens
Butte County Counsel

By Date

REVIEWED FOR CONTRACT POLICY COMPLIANCE

General Services Contracts Division Date
DRAFT
50 Item 1.

CITY OF OROVILLE

STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR PITTMAN AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: AMY BERGSTRAND, DIRECTOR

BUSINESS ASSISTANCE/HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
RE: MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH OROVILLE RESOURCE

CENTER AND RESCUE MISSION (ORC) FOR ESPERANZA VILLAGE
DATE: JUNE 17, 2025

SUMMARY
The City Council shall consider a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Oroville Resource Center and Rescue Mission (ORC) for the use of the City’s mobile restroom and shower trailer unit for the use at Esperanza Village for a period of three (3) years.

DISCUSSION
The City of Oroville was awarded two (2) rounds of Encampment Resolution Funding in support of the development of emergency beds and services to serve the chronically homeless and atrisk people in the City limits of Oroville. This project received support for construction from both the City and County ARPA funds. Additionally, the application for funding identified an in-kind match from the City for the use of the City’s shower trailer and remediation at the site valued at $7,500 per month for three (3) years and $120,000, respectively.

This MOU will be in effect for three (3) years from the date on the agreement; or until the work is complete, with an option for an extension.

FISCAL IMPACT
No General Fund Impact.

RECOMMENDATION
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 9384 – A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL

AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF

UNDERSTANDING WITH THE OROVILLE RESOURCE CENTER AND RESCUE MISSION (ORC) FOR THE USE OF THE CITY OF OROVILLE’S SHOWER TRAILER FOR ESPERANZA VILLAGE FOR A PERIOD OF THREE (3) YEARS.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Memorandum of Understanding No. 3549

2. Resolution No. 9384
51 Item 2.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 CITY OF OROVILLE
RESOLUTION NO.9384

A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING

THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE

OROVILLE RESOURCE CENTER AND RESCUE MISSION (ORC) FOR THE USE OF THE CITY OF OROVILLE’S SHOWER TRAILER FOR ESPERANZA VILLAGE FOR A PERIOD OF THREE (3) YEARS.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Oroville City Council as follows:

1. The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Memorandum of Understanding with the Oroville Rescue Mission and Rescue Mission (ORC) for the use of the City of Oroville’s shower trailer for Esperanza Village for a period of three (3) years.

2. The City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oroville at a regular meeting on June 17, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

David Pittman, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

David Ritchie, City Attorney Brian Ring, City Clerk
52 Item 2.

Agreement No. 3549

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

BETWEEN CITY OF OROVILLE

AND OROVILLE RESOURCE CENTER AND RESCUE MISSION
(ORC) FOR (ESPERANZA VILLAGE)

1. Parties. This Memorandum of Understanding (hereinafter referred to as “MOU”) is made and entered into by and between the City of Oroville, whose address is 1735 Montgomery St., Oroville CA 95965, and the Oroville Resource Center and Rescue Mission (ORC)whose address 2150 Bird St., Oroville CA 95965, for the use at Esperanza Village whose address is 4248 Lincoln Blvd., Oroville CA 95966.

2. Purpose. The purpose of this MOU is to establish the terms and conditions under which the Parties will operate the City of Oroville owned Forest River Mobile Restroom and Shower Trailer “Shower Trailer” for use at the Esperanza Village Shelter. Use of the Shower Trailer shall be limited to individuals residing at or officially utilizing services at Esperanza Village and shall not be made available for other programs or third-party use without prior written consent of the City.

3. Term of MOU. This MOU is effective upon the day and date last signed and executed by the duly authorized representatives of the Parties to this MOU and the governing bodies of the Parties’ respective counties or municipalities and shall remain in full force and effect for not longer than three (3) years. This MOU may be terminated, without cause, by either Party upon 30-day written notice, which notice shall be delivered by hand or by certified mail to the address listed above. Additionally, this MOU may be extended at the request of the ORC and the approval of the Oroville City Council.

4. ORC Responsibilities under this MOU. The ORC will be responsible for the following tasks related to the Shower Trailer:
a) The set up and security of the Shower Trailer at Mission Esperanza, and b) Regular Maintenance and Cleaning of the Shower Trailer, and c) Repairs, as necessary, shall be the responsibility of the ORC, subject to prior written approval by the City of Oroville for any repair estimated to exceed $500 in cost.

5. Performance Review. The Parties agree to meet at least once annually during the term of this MOU to review the use, condition, and effectiveness of the Shower Trailer and the partnership at Esperanza Village. The City reserves the right to recommend improvements or modifications to operations or responsibilities at that time.

6. Indemnification. To the extent permitted by law, the ORC agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Oroville, its officials, officers, agents, and employees from and 53 Item 2.

Agreement No. 3549
against any and all claims, liabilities, damages, or expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees) arising from or related to the use, maintenance, or operation of the Shower Trailer by ORC, except where caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

7. Insurance. ORC shall maintain general liability insurance in an amount not less than $250,000 per occurrence and $500,000 aggregate, and shall name the City of Oroville as an additional insured with respect to activities conducted under this MOU. Proof of insurance shall be provided annually or upon request.

8. General Provisions

8.1 Amendments. Either Party may request changes to this MOU. Any changes, modifications, revisions or amendments to this MOU which are mutually agreed upon by and between the Parties to this MOU shall be incorporated by written instrument, and effective when executed and signed by all Parties to this MOU.

8.2 Applicable Law. The construction, interpretation and enforcement of this MOU shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. The courts of the State of California shall have jurisdiction over any action arising out of this MOU and over the Parties, and the venue shall be the Superior Court of Butte County, California.

8.3 Entirety of Agreement. This MOU, consisting of three (3) pages, represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Parties and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations and agreements, whether written or oral.

8.4 Severability. Should any portion of this MOU be determined to be illegal or unenforceable, by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the MOU shall continue in full force and effect, and either Party may renegotiate the terms affected by the severance.

8.5 Government Claims Act Compliance. Nothing in this MOU shall be construed to waive any immunities or defenses available to either Party under the California Government Claims Act (Government Code section 810 et seq.) or other applicable provisions of law. This MOU is not intended to create any new basis for liability for either Party or to expand the scope of liability otherwise provided by law.

8.6 Third Party Beneficiary Rights. The Parties do not intend to create in any other individual or entity the status of a third-party beneficiary, and this MOU shall not be construed so as to create such status. The rights, duties and obligations contained in this MOU shall operate only between the Parties to this MOU and shall inure solely to the benefit of the Parties to this MOU. The provisions of this MOU are intended only to assist the Parties in determining and performing their obligations under this MOU. The Parties to this MOU intend and expressly agree that only Parties signatory to this MOU shall have any legal or equitable right to seek to enforce this MOU, to seek any remedy 54 Item 2.

Agreement No. 3549
arising out of a party’s performance or failure to perform any term or condition of this MOU, or to bring an action for the breach of this MOU.

9. Effective Date / Signatures. In witness whereof, the Parties to this MOU through their duly authorized representatives have executed this MOU on the days and dates set out below, and certify that they have read, understood, and agreed to the terms and conditions of this MOU as set forth herein. The effective date of this MOU is the date of the signature last affixed to this page.

For the CITY: For the ORC:

Date: June ____, 2025 Date: June ____, 2025
___________________________________ ________________________________ David Pittman, Mayor Allan Dikes, Executive Director
55 Item 2.

Page 1 ends

CITY OF OROVILLE

STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR PITTMAN & COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: ALYSSA STUTZ, INTERIM DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

CODY NISSEN, AIRPORT MANAGER
RE: APPLICATION FOR AIRPORT FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
DATE: JUNE 17, 2025

BACKGROUND
On March 4, 2025, the City Council approved the acceptance of an FAA Airport Infrastructure Grant (AIG) for $298,281 (pending offer) to fund engineering design and construction for Schedule A – Crack Seal of Taxiway L and North Tie Down Apron, as well as engineering design only for Schedule B – Crack Seal of the South Tie Down Apron and Tee Hangar Taxilanes, and the Runway 13-31 marking upgrade. (See attached March 4 staff report.)
Following Council’s approval, the FAA directed City staff to revise the grant scopes and redistribute project elements between two different federal funding sources: the AIP (Airport Improvement Program) and AIG (Airport Infrastructure Grant). As a result, the original AIG proposal has been withdrawn and replaced with two separate grant applications that together fund 95% of the total design and construction costs for the entire airport crack seal and marking upgrade project.

SUMMARY
Staff requests Council authorization to accept and execute the following grant offers (once received) to complete the airport crack seal and marking upgrade projects for FY25–26:
 FAA AIP Grant – $244,321
 FAA AIG Grant – $307,529
Staff requests Council authorization to apply for, accept, and execute the following grant offers (once received)
 Caltrans State Matching Grant – $12,216
These grants will fund the following:
 Schedule A (via FAA AIP + Caltrans Grant):

Engineering Design and Construction for Crack Seal of Taxiway L and North Tie Down Apron
 Schedule B + Runway 13-31 (via FAA AIG Grant):

Engineering Design and Construction for Crack Seal of the South Tie Down Apron, 56 Item 3.

Page 2 ends

Tee Hangar Taxilanes, and the Runway 13-31 Marking Upgrade The AIP/Caltrans-funded portion has a total project cost of $263,585, of which $244,321 will be federally funded (95%), $12,216 from Caltrans (5% of the federal share), and $7,048 will be the City’s responsibility (which includes $643 in required match and $6,405 in ineligible costs near the FBO).

The AIG-funded portion totals $341,815, with $307,529 in federal funding (95% of eligible costs) and $34,286 in City funding, which includes a $16,186 match and $18,100 in ineligible work between hangars.

DISCUSSION
On September 29, 2023, staff submitted a Pre-Application for Federal Assistance to fund crack sealing of Taxiway L and the North Tie Down Apron (Schedule A), as well as the South Tie Down Apron and Tee Hangar Taxilanes (Schedule B). This work is necessary to meet FAA safety standards and extend the life of the existing pavement until full rehabilitation planned for 2029.

Due to limited federal funding in FY24–25, the project was not approved that cycle. Staff resubmitted the application on December 30, 2024.

Following the City Council’s March 4, 2025 approval of an initial grant proposal, the FAA informed staff that the project scope needed to be split across two grant types: the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) and the Airport Infrastructure Grant (AIG). As a result, the original grant application was withdrawn, and two new grant applications were prepared to align with FAA requirements.

Because the FAA typically provides a very short turnaround time (often two weeks or less) to accept and execute grant offers once issued, staff requests Council’s advance authorization to accept and execute the grants upon offer. This will help avoid delays due to scheduling constraints with Council meetings.

FAA AIG Grant:

Total Project Costs: $341,815.00
Federally Ineligible Costs: $18,100.00
Total FAA Eligible Costs: $323,715.00
FAA participation 95%: $307,529.00 (95% of $323,715)
City 5% match on FAA eligible portion = $16,186.00 (5% of $323,715.00) Total City costs = $34,286.00 ($16,186.00 + $18,100.00 of Federally Ineligible costs) FAA AIP Grant:

Total Project Costs: $263,585.00
Federally Ineligible Costs: $6,405.00
Total FAA Eligible Costs: $257,180.00
57 Item 3.

Page 3 ends

FAA participation 95%: $244,321.00 (95% of $257,180.00) State Participation: $12,216.00 (5% of the FAA Participation) City Participation: $7,048.00 (City portion of FAA eligible funding + 100% of FAA ineligible costs) = $643.00 + $6,405 ineligible. (City portion of FAA eligible funding is $257,180 - $244,321 FAA 95% participation - $12,216 State match = $643)

FISCAL IMPACT FOR BOTH PROJECTS
$41,334.00 from the Airport Fund

ACTION(S) REQUESTED -

2. APPROVE THE ACCEPTANCE AND EXECUTION OF THE AIP GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $244,321.00 (ONCE OFFERED) FOR AIRPORT CRACK SEAL OF TAXIWAY “L” AND NORTH TIEDOWN APRON

3. APPROVE APPLYING FOR, ACCEPTANCE AND EXECUTION OF THE STATE MATCHING GRANT FOR CRACK SEAL TAXIWAY “L” AND NORTH TIEDOWN APRON – DESIGN / CONSTRUCT – CALTRANS MATCHING GRANT OF $12,216.00
NOTE:

Staff is unable to apply for the CalTrans “State Matching” Grant until after receipt of the FAA AIP Grant. The CalTrans “State Matching” Grant application requires proof of Council approval to apply for, accept, and execute the CalTrans Matching Grant

ATTACHMENTS
Original staff report dated March 4, 2025.
58 Item 3.

Page 1 ends

CITY OF OROVILLE

STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR PITTMAN & COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: ALYSSA STUTZ, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

CODY NISSEN, AIRPORT MANAGER
RE: ADVANCED APPROVAL OF ACCEPTANCE OF FEDERAL AVIATION

ADMINISTRATION GRANT ASSISTANCE
DATE: MARCH 4, 2025

SUMMARY
The City Council shall consider permitting staff to accept an FAA Airport Infrastructure Grant (AIG) in the amount of $298,281 (once offered) for FY25-26 for the following work at the Oroville Municipal Airport:
 Engineering Design and Construction of Schedule A – Crack Seal Taxiway L and North Tie Down Apron
 Engineering Design only of Schedule B - Crack Seal South Tie Down Apron and Tee Hangar Taxi lanes
 Engineering Design only of Runway 13-31 pavement remark Securing this Federal AIG grant (if funded by the FAA and approved by Council) would require a 5% Airport Sponsor (City) “match” of $15,699.00 plus $6,405.00 in Federally ineligible costs associated with sealing the joints in front of the FBO. FAA considers the pavement within 50 feet of the FBO as “sole use” by the FBO and FAA only pays for pavement that is used by general aviation public and not one tenant, therefore the City must pay 100% of this $6,405 (see attachment), for a total City contribution of $22,104.00.

DISCUSSION
On September 29, 2023, staff submitted a Pre-Application for Federal Assistance for crack seal of taxiway L and North Tie down Apron (Schedule A) in addition to Crack Seal Tie Down South Apron and Tee Hanger taxi lanes (Schedule B) to meet FAA safety standards and ensure longevity of the current pavement until the proposed rehabilitation in 2029.

Unfortunately there weren’t sufficient Federal funds available to fund the project in FY24-

25. Consequently, staff resubmitted a Preapplication for Federal Assistance on December 30, 2024 for the attached project.
51 Item 5.
59 Item 3.

Page 2 ends

Staff do not have clarity on precisely when this grant will be offered, but upon such time that it is offered, there is typically a short window (generally 2 weeks or less) to execute, sign and return the grant offer to the FAA. This timeline does not always coincide well with Council meetings. Consequently, staff is requesting Council’s approval to move forward with the execution of the grant offer immediately upon reception.

Total Project Costs: $320,385
FAA participation: $298,281 (95% of $313,980)
City 5% match on FAA eligible portion = $15,699 (5% of $313,980) City 100% of ineligible costs: $6,405
Total City costs = $22,104
The City will be applying for a second FAA Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grant in the spring of 2025 which will include the following:
 Construction only of Schedule B Crack Seal South Tie Down Apron and Tee Hangar taxi lanes
 Construction only of Remark Runway 13-31
The City is in the process of getting bid prices for the Remark Runway 13-31 and will follow up with another Council item in April or May 2025 for approval of this second FAA grant. This second grant comes from a different FAA funding program.

FISCAL IMPACT
$22,104.00 from the Airport Fund

ACTION(S) REQUESTED -

1. APPROVE THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE AIG IN THE AMOUNT OF $298,281.00 (ONCE OFFERED) FOR AIRPORT CRACK SEAL SCHEDULE A AND B AND REMARK RUNWAY 13-31; AND

2. APPROVE THE CITY “MATCH” EXPENDITURE OF $15,699.00 PLUS THE FEDERALLY INELIGIBLE EXPENDITURE OF $6,405.00, FOR A TOTAL OF $22,104.00.

ATTACHMENTS
Summary of Project Costs
52 Item 5.
60 Item 3.

ATTACHMENT NO. 1D
Schedule A Schedule B Remark R/W Total
Construction $ 157,085.00 $ - - $ $ 157,085.00
Engineering:

Project Formulation - DBE Goal Preparation - $ 7,000.00 $ - $ 7,000.00 $ Environmental Document - Cat Ex 300.00 300.00 1,000.00 1,600.00 Project Scoping 2,500.00 2,500.00 - 5,000.00
Crack Surveys 1,000.00 1,000.00 - 2,000.00
Engineering Design and Preparation of Plans and Specifications 16,000.00 16,000.00 12,000.00 44,000.00 Engineering During Bid and Award 6,000.00 - 5,000.00 11,000.00 Engineering During Construction 15,000.00 - - 15,000.00 Resident Engineering, Testing, and Inspection - 57,700.00 - 57,700.00 Total Engineering Costs $ 26,800.00 98,500.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 143,300.00 $ Administration $ 6,000.00 10,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ Total Project Costs $ 320,385.00
Less Ineligible Construction Costs (6,405.00)
Total (FAA Eligible) Project Costs 313,980.00 $
F.A.A. Participation 298,281.00 $
Sponsor Participation - Grant Match (5%) + Ineligible Costs 22,104.00 $ Schedule B - Crack Seal South Tie Down Apron and Tee Hangar Taxilanes - Design

SUMMARY OF PROJECT COSTS

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA
FY 2024/25 AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT (AIG) - DESIGN/CONSTRUCT Schedule A - Crack Seal Taxiway L and North Tie Down Apron - Design/Construct Remark Runway 13-31 - Design
Attachment 1D 2/19/2025 53
Item 5.
61 Item 3.

Page 1 ends

CITY OF OROVILLE

STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR PITTMAN AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: ALYSSA STUTZ; ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
CODY NISSEN; AIRPORT MANAGER
RE: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BRANDLEY
ENGINEERING INC. FOR, ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING,

AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
DATE: JUNE 17, 2025

SUMMARY
The City Council shall consider approving a five-year Professional Services Agreement with Brandley Engineering Inc., Consulting Airport Engineer (Brandley), for Architectural and Engineering Services for the Oroville Municipal Airport.

DISCUSSION
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) provides funding to airports through the Airport Improvement Program (AIP). Each year, the City submits an updated five-year Airport Capital Improvement Plan (ACIP) to the FAA, along with specific project grant requests for the current fiscal year.

As part of the FAA's requirements, contracts for airport Planning and Engineering Services must undergo a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process every five years.

The City of Oroville currently holds a Planning and Environmental Services contract with Brandley Engineering, which is set to expire on March 30, 2028. However, the existing contract for Architectural and Engineering Services with Brandley Engineering Inc. will expire on June 16, 2025.

In accordance with FAA guidelines, the City issued an RFQ on January 14, 2025, to seek consulting firms for future airport improvement architectural and engineering design projects over the next five years. The RFQ was posted on the City’s website and Public Purchase. Firms were required to submit proposals detailing their qualifications and experience in airport design and engineering projects. The deadline for proposals was Friday, February 7, 2025, and Brandley Engineering Inc. was the 62 Item 4.

Page 2 ends

only firm to submit a response. City staff reviewed the proposal and determined that Brandley Engineering remains a highly qualified firm for the required services.

Brandley Engineering has a long history of providing engineering services for the Oroville Municipal Airport. Their work dates back to 1964, with additional contributions in 1985 and continuous service since then. Their most recent architectural and engineering contract was approved in 2020. Over the years, Brandley Engineering has successfully planned, designed, engineered, and managed multiple airport projects.

Firm owners Melissa Brandley and Damon Brandley have consistently delivered highquality results for all airport engineering projects.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Airport Fund will cover 5% of the cost of Brandley Engineering Inc.'s services for 2025 and 2026, and 10% for 2027, 2028, and 2029. The remaining portion of the cost will be funded through FAA grant funding for qualifying projects at the Oroville Airport.

The total fiscal impact for the five-year period is currently unknown. For each individual project, a Task Order will be prepared and executed by both Brandley Engineering and the City, outlining the specific scope of work and the total compensation for the project.

RECOMMENDATION
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 9386 – A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL

AUTHORING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BRADLEY ENGINEERING INC., AIRPORT CONSULTING ENGINEER,

FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES AT THE OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FOR FAA GRANT FUNDED PROJECTS – AGREEMENT NO. 3548.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 9386

2. Agreement No. 3548
63 Item 4.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

CITY OF OROVILLE
RESOLUTION NO. 9386

A RESOLUTION OF THE OROVILLE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A 5-YEAR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BRANDLEY ENGINEERING INC. FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING

SERVICES FOR THE OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
(Agreement No.3548)
WHEREAS, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) provides funding to airports through the Airport Improvement Program (AIP); and
WHEREAS, as part of the FAA’s requirements, each year the City of Oroville submits an updated five-year Airport Capital Improvement Plan (ACIP) to the FAA, along with specific project grant requests for the current fiscal year; and WHEREAS, FAA guidelines stipulate that contracts for airport Planning and Engineering Services must undergo a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process every five years; and WHEREAS, the City of Oroville holds an existing contract with Brandley Engineering Inc. for Architectural and Engineering Services, which is set to expire on June 16, 2025; and WHEREAS, in accordance with FAA guidelines, the City issued an RFQ on January 14, 2025, to solicit proposals from consulting firms for future airport improvement architectural and engineering design projects for the next five years; and WHEREAS, the RFQ was posted on the City’s website and Public Purchase, with firms required to submit proposals detailing their qualifications and experience in airport design and engineering projects, and the deadline for proposals was set for February 7, 2025; and WHEREAS, Brandley Engineering Inc. was the only respondent to the RFQ and has performed exemplary architectural and engineering services for the City of Oroville since 1985.

NOW THERFORE, be it hereby resolved by the Oroville City Council as follows:

1. The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute the five (5) year Professional Services Agreement with Brandley Engineering Inc. for the provision of architectural and engineering services for the Oroville Municipal Airport, in accordance with the terms outlined in the submitted proposal and in compliance with all applicable FAA regulations and guidelines.

2. The City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this resolution. 64 Item 4.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Oroville City Council at a regular meeting on June 17, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

David Pittman, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

David Ritchie, City Attorney Brian Ring, City Clerk
65 Item 4.
1 CITY OF OROVILLE

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES Agreement No. 3548
This Agreement is made on this 17th day of June, 2025, at Oroville, California, by and between the City of Oroville, a California Charter City, 1735 Montgomery Street, Oroville California, 95965 (hereinafter referred to as the “CITY”) and Brandley Engineering Inc., 6125 King Road, Suite 201, Loomis, CA 95650 (hereinafter referred to as the “CONTRACTOR”).

RECITALS
A. The CITY proposes to contract for professional services as outlined below; B. The CITY conducted an RFQ for Architectural/Engineering Services for Airport Development Project for Oroville Municipal Airport issued in January 2025, and selected CONTRACTOR as the preferred service provider;
C. The CONTRACTOR is willing to perform such services and has the necessary qualifications by reason of experience, preparation, and organization to provide such services; NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY and the CONTRACTOR, mutually agree as follows:

1. SERVICES.

The CONTRACTOR shall perform those services set forth in “Exhibit A,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

2. TERM OF AGREEMENT.

The term of this contract shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall expire five (5) years from the date of this Agreement.

3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE.

The services of the CONTRACTOR are to commence on an as-needed basis, in the form of Task Orders. Each Task Order will have it’s own schedule and not-to-exceed amount.

4. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES.

The City will pay CONTRACTOR for CONTRACTOR’s time and authorized expenses necessary to perform the Services, at the rates and charges set forth in the Compensation Rates and Charges attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by reference, as compensation in full for Services satisfactorily performed under task orders accepted by Consultant and in compliance with this Agreement. Consultant’s total compensation for performing the Services may not exceed the amount specified in task orders without prior written authorization from the City. The CONTRACTOR shall be paid within forty-five (45) days of presentation of an invoice to the CITY for services performed to the CITY’s satisfaction. The CONTRACTOR shall submit invoices monthly describing the services performed, the date services were performed, a description of reimbursable costs, and any other information requested by the CITY.
66 Item 4.
2 5. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.

5.1. The CITY’s Representative. Unless otherwise designated in writing, Cody Nissen, shall serve as the CITY’s representative for the administration of the project. All activities performed by the CONTRACTOR shall be coordinated with this person.

5.2. Manager-in-Charge. For the CONTRACTOR, Melissa Brandley, shall be in charge of the project on all matters relating to this Agreement and any agreement or approval made by her/him shall be binding on the CONTRACTOR. The Manager-in Charge shall not be replaced without the written consent of the CITY.

5.3. Responsibilities of the CITY. The CITY shall provide all relevant documentation in its possession to the CONTRACTOR upon request in order to minimize duplication of efforts. The CITY’s staff shall work with the CONTRACTOR as necessary to facilitate performance of the services.

5.4. Personnel. The CONTRACTOR represents that it has or will secure at its own expense all personnel required to perform the services under this Agreement. All of the services required under this Agreement will be performed by the CONTRACTOR or under its supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be qualified to perform such services. The CONTRACTOR reserves the right to determine the assignment of its own employees to the performance of the CONTRACTOR’s services under this Agreement, but the CITY reserves the right, for good cause, to require the CONTRACTOR to exclude any employee from performing services on the CITY’s premises.

6. TERMINATION.

6.1. Termination for Convenience. Either party may terminate this Agreement without cause and in its sole discretion at any time by giving the other party thirty (30) days' written notice of such termination. In the event of such termination, the CONTRACTOR shall cease services as of the date of termination and shall be compensated for services performed to the CITY's satisfaction up to the date of termination.

6.2. Termination for Cause. All terms, provisions, and specifications of this Agreement are material and binding, and failure to perform any material portion of the work described herein shall be considered a breach of this Agreement. Should the Agreement be breached in any manner, the CITY may, at its option, terminate the Agreement not less than five (5) days after written notification is received by the CONTRACTOR to remedy the violation within the stated time or within any other time period agreed to by the parties. In the event of such termination, the CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any additional costs incurred by the CITY in securing the services from another contractor.

7. INDEMNIFICATION.

Contractor shall indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to CITY), and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, and employees (collectively, “CITY”) from and against any and all liability, claims, damages, losses, expenses, and costs (including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees, expert fees, and all other costs and expenses of litigation) actually caused by Contractor’s negligent acts, recklessness, willful misconduct, errors, or omissions in 67 Item 4.
3 the performance of work under this Agreement, or Contractor’s failure to comply with any obligation of this Agreement.

In the event CITY is named as a party defendant in a lawsuit arising out of such acts or omissions, Contractor shall reimburse CITY’s defense costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees, expert fees, and other litigation expenses after final determination of liability and not to exceed the Contractor’s proportionate percentage of fault as awarded by a court or arbitrator of competent jurisdiction.

To the extent Contractor is a “design professional” as defined in California Civil Code section 2782.8, Contractor’s indemnity and defense obligations under this section for claims actually caused by its performance of design professional services shall be limited to claims actually caused by Contractor’s sole negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct, as required by that statute. This limitation shall apply only to professional services performed in the capacity of a design professional. All other services performed under this Agreement—including but not limited to non-professional, administrative, or support services—shall remain fully subject to the indemnity and defense obligations set forth herein, without limitation to proportionate fault, except as otherwise required by applicable law.

Contractor shall promptly pay any final, non-appealable judgment rendered against the CITY. It is expressly understood that this indemnity is intended to be as broad and inclusive as permitted by California law, except as limited by Civil Code § 2782.8 or where the loss is caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY.

The obligations established by this paragraph will survive termination of this Agreement. For purposes of this paragraph:
• CITY means the CITY Council and its subordinate bodies, elected and appointed CITY officials and officers, and CITY employees.
• Liability means any claims or causes of action raised or asserted by, damage to, loss or expense incurred by or judgments rendered in favor of persons or entities not a party to this Agreement.
• The types of damages included within this indemnity obligation include, but are not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death, loss of use, and damage to or loss of real and personal property.
• The indemnity obligation of this paragraph includes all forms of negligent acts, errors and omissions, wrongful behavior and willful misconduct (including but not limited to breaches of professional standards of care, if applicable, and breach of contract) by Contractor and any of its officers, agents employees and subcontractors.

8. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.
68 Item 4.
4 8.1. The CONTRACTOR, at the CONTRACTOR’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies:

8.1.1. Workers’ Compensation Coverage. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance for its employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, the CONTRACTOR shall require any and every subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all the subcontractor’s employees. Any notice of cancellation or nonrenewal of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by the CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the CONTRACTOR for CITY. This provision shall not apply if the CONTRACTOR has no employees performing work under this Agreement.

8.1.2. General Liability Coverage. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit.

8.1.3. Automobile Liability Coverage. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the CONTRACTOR arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. If CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR’s employees will use personal autos in any way on this project, CONTRACTOR shall obtain evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person.

8.1.4. Professional Liability Coverage. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors, or omissions which may arise from the CONTRACTOR’s operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by the CONTRACTOR or by its employees, subcontractors, or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit-per-occurrence basis.

8.2. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be issued by insurers possessing a Best’s rating of no less than A-:VII. Each general liability insurance policy shall be endorsed with the specific language of Section 8.2.1 below.

CONTRACTOR also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 69 Item 4.
5 8.2.1. “The CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the CONTRACTOR, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.”

8.2.2. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the CITY, including any self-insured retention the CITY may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with this policy.

8.2.3. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company.

8.2.4. Notwithstanding the provisions included in any of the ISO Additional Insured Endorsement forms, CONTRACTOR acknowledges that the insurance coverage and policy limits set forth in this section constitute the minimum amounts of coverage required. Any insurance proceeds available to the CITY in excess of the limits and coverage required in this agreement and which is applicable to a given loss will be available to the CITY.

8.2.5. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, or agents regardless of the applicability of any insurance proceeds, and agrees to require all subcontractors to do likewise.

8.2.6. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers.

8.2.7. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days’ written notice has been submitted to the CITY and approved of in writing, except in the case of cancellation, for which ten (10) days’ written notice shall be provided.

8.2.8. Contractor agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss against Contractor arising out of the work performed under this agreement. CITY assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve CITY.

8.3. Self-Insured Retention/Deductibles. All policies required by this Agreement shall allow CITY, as additional insured, to satisfy the self-insured retention (“SIR”) and/or deductible of the policy in lieu of the CONTRACTOR (as the named insured) should CONTRACTOR fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements. The amount of the SIR or deductible shall be subject to the approval of the CITY Attorney. CONTRACTOR understands and agrees that satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by CONTRACTOR as primary insured to pay its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of 70 Item 4.
6 this Agreement. Should CITY pay the SIR or deductible on CONTRACTOR’s behalf upon the CONTRACTOR’s failure or refusal to do so in order to secure defense and indemnification as an additional insured under the policy, CITY may include such amounts as damages in any action against CONTRACTOR for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other damages incurred by CITY due to the breach.

8.4. Certificates of Insurance. The CONTRACTOR shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to the CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein.

Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the CITY on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the CITY at all times during the term of this Agreement. The CONTRACTOR shall provide written evidence of current automobile coverage to comply with the automobile insurance requirement.

8.5. Failure to Procure Insurance. Failure on the part of the CONTRACTOR to procure or maintain required insurance shall constitute a material breach of contract under which the CITY may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 6.2 above.

9. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING.

The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to the City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience, and competence of the CONTRACTOR. Assignments of any or all rights, duties, or obligations of the CONTRACTOR under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the written authorization of the CITY. If the CITY consents to such subcontract, the CONTRACTOR shall be fully responsible to the CITY for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the CITY and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the CITY to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law.

10. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS, CODES, ORDINANCES, AND REGULATIONS.

The CONTRACTOR shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations.

10.1. Taxes. The CONTRACTOR agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to the CONTRACTOR under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold the CITY harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against the CITY by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. In the event that the CITY is audited by any Federal or State agency regarding the independent contractor status of the CONTRACTOR and the audit in any way fails to sustain the validity of a wholly independent contractor relationship between the CITY and the CONTRACTOR, then the CONTRACTOR agrees to reimburse the CITY for all costs, including accounting and attorneys’ fees, arising out of such audit and any appeals relating thereto.

10.2. Workers’ Compensation Law. The CONTRACTOR shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation law regarding the CONTRACTOR and the CONTRACTOR’s employees. The CONTRACTOR further agrees to indemnify and hold the CITY harmless from any failure of the 71 Item 4.
7 CONTRACTOR to comply with applicable workers’ compensation laws. The CITY shall have the right to offset against the amount of any compensation due to the CONTRACTOR under this Agreement any amount due to the CITY from the CONTRACTOR as a result of the CONTRACTOR’s failure to promptly pay to the CITY any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section.

10.3. Licenses. The CONTRACTOR represents and warrants to the CITY that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance, and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of the CONTRACTOR to practice its profession. The CONTRACTOR represents and warrants to the CITY that the CONTRACTOR shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, insurance, and approvals which are legally required of the CONTRACTOR to practice its profession.

11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

The CONTRACTOR confirms that it has no financial, contractual, or other interest or obligation that conflicts with or is harmful to performance of its obligations under this Agreement. The CONTRACTOR shall not during the term of this Agreement knowingly obtain such an interest or incur such an obligation, nor shall it employ or subcontract with any person for performance of this Agreement who has such incompatible interest or obligation.

12. NON-DISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY.

The CONTRACTOR represents and agrees that it does not and will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, political affiliation or opinion, medical condition, or pregnancy or pregnancy-related condition. The CONTRACTOR will ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, religion, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, political affiliation or opinion, medical condition, or pregnancy or pregnancy-related condition. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, promotion, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoffs or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONTRACTOR agrees to include in all solicitations or advertisements for employment and to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.

13. RECORDS AND AUDITS.

The CONTRACTOR shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property, and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Agreement and such other records as may be deemed necessary by the CITY or any authorized representative.

All records shall be made available at the request of the CITY, with reasonable notice, during regular business hours, and shall be retained by the CONTRACTOR for a period of three years after the expiration of this Agreement.

14. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.

It is understood and agreed that the CITY shall own all documents and other work product of the CONTRACTOR, except the CONTRACTOR’s notes and workpapers, which pertain to the work 72 Item 4.
8 performed under this Agreement. The CITY shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion and without further compensation to the CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR shall at its sole expense provide all such documents to the CITY upon request.

15. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.

The CONTRACTOR is and shall at all times remain as to the CITY a wholly independent CONTRACTOR. Neither the CITY nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of the CONTRACTOR or any of the CONTRACTOR’s employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The CONTRACTOR shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of the CITY or otherwise act on behalf of the CITY as an agent unless that authority is expressly authorized in writing by CITY. By executing this Agreement, CONTRACTOR confirms and asserts that A) they shall be responsible to direct their own work and are free from CITY control in the precise manner and details of how the work is carried out; B) that the work performed by CONTRACTOR is understood to be outside the scope of the usual course of business carried out by the CITY; and C) that CONTRACTOR is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature of that performed for the CITY.

If CONTRACTOR, at any time comes to believe that they are an employee and not an independent contractor, CONTRACTOR shall immediately notify the CITY of such belief. All work to be performed by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement shall be immediately suspended. Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the CITY from any and all claims, demands, losses, causes of action, damage, lawsuits, judgments, including attorneys' fees and costs, provided that such claims arise out of or are based upon the Contractor's designation as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the CITY. Contractor waives any right to recover from the CITY any expenses or losses, including but not limited to those arising from claims that Contractor was misclassified as an independent contractor unless such indemnification is prohibited by law. In the event CONTRACTOR notifies CITY of a purported misclassification, the CITY may elect to immediately terminate this Agreement.

16. NOTICE.

All Notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be in writing, and shall be deemed made when delivered to the applicable party’s representative as provided in this Agreement.

Additionally, such notices may be given to the respective parties at the following addresses, or at such other addresses as the parties may provide in writing for this purpose. Such notices shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. mail, first-class postage prepaid, and addressed to the party at its applicable address.

CITY:

City of Oroville,
1735 Montgomery Street,
Oroville, California, 95965
Attention: City Administrator
CONTRACTOR:
73 Item 4.
9 Brandley Engineering
6125 King Road, Suite 201,
Loomis, California 95650
Attention: Melissa Brandley

17. INCOPRORATION FAA CONTRACT PROVISIONS.

The terms and provisions set forth in “Exhibit C” Required Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects are hereby incorporated by this reference.

Where possible, terms of all documents incorporated by reference herein shall be construed in a manner that avoids conflict between the various documents. However, in the event such a conflict cannot be avoided, the terms of Exhibit C shall prevail over all.

18. GOVERNING LAW.

This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. The venue shall be the County of Butte, California

19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; MODIFICATION.

This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, except as indicated below, either oral or written, between the parties, and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements, oral or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein except as noted below. Any agreement, statement, or promise not contained in the Agreement, and any modification to the Agreement, will be effective only if signed by both parties. The existing Agreement for Professional Services between the City of Oroville and Brandley Engineering dated March 30, 2023 for Airport Planning and Environmental Services is not superseded by this agreement and remains valid and unaltered by this agreement.

20. WAIVER.

Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this agreement. Payment of any invoice by the CITY shall not constitute a waiver of the CITY’s right to obtain correction or replacement of any defective or noncompliant work product.

21. EXECUTION.

This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.

22. AUTHORITY TO ENTER AGREEMENT.

The CONTRACTOR has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform this Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party.
74 Item 4.
10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the 17th day of June, 2025.

CONTRACTOR:
_____________________________________
{Name, Title}
CITY OF OROVILLE:
_____________________________________
David Pittman, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________________
David Ritchie, City Attorney
75 Item 4.

Exhibit A
Scope of Architectural/Engineering Services
The scope of services includes, but is not limited to, the following tasks. Tasks may include additional items as described in the Brandley Statement of Qualifications dated February 7, 2025.
• Preparation of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airport Improvement Program (AIP)grant funding applications and associated documentation including but not limited to required reports and project closeout documents.
• Assist with project coordination with FAA and California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics (Caltrans) including on-site meetings. • Represent the City in discussions with FAA and Caltrans regarding projects, requirements and grant assurances.
• Provide airport and aviation-related design and engineering services as required by the City to include , but not be limited to: geotechnical studies , pavement evaluation studies, drainage studies, airport design and engineering, terminal area design and engineering, value engineering, cost estimating, development of plans and specifications, bid documents, and project coordination. The work may be accomplished during the course of multiple grants.
• Provide construction engineering services including resident engineering, testing and inspection of all contractor operations during construction of the specific projects. • Miscellaneous airport architectural, engineering and consulting support services as may be required from time to time by the City. These consultant services may include representing the City in all discussions with the FAA regarding the work program, grant requirements, and project documentation.
76 Item 4.
12 Exhibit B – Compensation Rates and Charges

STANDARD BILLING RATES
JANUARY 2025
Personnel
Principal Engineer ...........................................$300.00/Hour Senior Engineer...............................................$190.00/Hour Junior Engineer ...............................................$130.00/Hour Senior Drafter..................................................$120.00/Hour Junior Drafter ..................................................$100.00/Hour Laboratory Technician.......................................$90.00/Hour Laboratory Apprentice .......................................$50.00/Hour Project Administrator.......................................$100.00/Hour Clerical ..............................................................$85.00/Hour Resident Engineer......................................... $200.00/Hour* Senior Inspector ............................................ $180.00/Hour* Apprentice....................................................... $95.00/Hour* Travel and Vehicle Rental
Per Diem ............................................................ $230/Day** Vehicle Rental ............................$50.00/Day + $0.70/Mile*** Subconsultants
Consulting Services, Testing Services................Cost + 10% *Resident Engineer, Senior Inspector and Apprentice rates subject to change based on future increases to published DIR Prevailing Wage Rate
**Subject to change based on U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) Per Diem Rates plus applicable taxes.
***Subject to change based on IRS standard rate for mileage 77 Item 4.

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on May 24, 2023 Page 1

EXHIBIT C

CONTRACT PROVISIONS FOR OBLIGATED SPONSORS AND AIRPORT

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS

1. ACCESS TO RECORDS AND REPORTS
2 CFR § 200.334
2 CFR § 200.337
FAA Order 5100.38
The Contractor must maintain an acceptable cost accounting system. The Contractor agrees to provide the Owner, the Federal Aviation Administration and the Comptroller General of the United States or any of their duly authorized representatives access to any books, documents, papers and records of the Contractor which are directly pertinent to the specific contract for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts and transcriptions. The Contractor agrees to maintain all books, records and reports required under this contract for a period of not less than three years after final payment is made and all pending matters are

2. BREACH OF CONTRACT TERMS
2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(A)
Any violation or breach of terms of this contract on the part of the Consultant or its subcontractors may result in the suspension or termination of this contract or such other action that may be necessary to enforce the rights of the parties of this agreement.

Owner will provide Consultant written notice that describes the nature of the breach and corrective actions the Consultant must undertake in order to avoid termination of the contract. Owner reserves the right to withhold payments to Contractor until such time the Contractor corrects the breach or the Owner elects to terminate the contract. The Owner’s notice will identify a specific date by which the Consultant must correct the breach. Owner may proceed with termination of the contract if the Consultant fails to correct the breach by the deadline indicated in the Owner’s notice.

The duties and obligations imposed by the Contract Documents and the rights and remedies available thereunder are in addition to, and not a limitation of, any duties, obligations, rights and remedies otherwise imposed or available by law.

3. CIVIL RIGHTS - GENERAL
49 USC § 47123

GENERAL CIVIL RIGHTS PROVISIONS
In all its activities within the scope of its airport program, the Contractor agrees to comply with pertinent statutes, Executive Orders, and such rules as identified in Title VI List of Pertinent Nondiscrimination Acts and Authoritiesto ensure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin (including 78 Item 4.

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on May 24, 2023 Page 2
limited English proficiency), creed, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), age, or disability be excluded from participating in any activity conducted with or benefiting from Federal assistance.

This provision is in addition to that required by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The above provision binds the Contractor and subcontractors from the bid solicitation period through the completion of the contract.

4. CIVIL RIGHTS – TITLE VI ASSURANCE
49 USC § 47123
FAA Order 1400.11
Title VI Solicitation Notice:

The City of Oroville, in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 USC §§ 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders or offerors that it will affirmatively ensure that for any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, [select businesses, or disadvantaged business enterprises or airport concession disadvantaged business enterprises] will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and no businesses will be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, national origin (including limited English proficiency), creed, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), age, or disability in consideration for an award.

Title VI List of Pertinent Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities During the performance of this contract, the Contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the “Contractor”) agrees to comply with the following non-discrimination statutes and authorities; including but not limited to:
• Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); • 49 CFR part 21 (Non-discrimination in Federally-Assisted programs of the Department of Transportation—Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964); • The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 USC § 4601) (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects); • Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 USC § 794 et seq.), as amended (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CFR part 27 (Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance); • The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 USC § 6101 et seq.) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age);
• Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982 (49 USC § 47123), as amended (prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, or sex); • The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (PL 100-259) (broadened the scope, coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms “programs or activities” to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal-aid recipients, sub-recipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally funded or not); 79 Item 4.

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on May 24, 2023 Page 3
• Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12101, et seq) (prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing entities) as implemented by U.S. Department of Transportation regulations at 49 CFR parts 37 and 38; • The Federal Aviation Administration’s Nondiscrimination statute (49 USC § 47123) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and sex); • Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (ensures nondiscrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations); • Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, and resulting agency guidance, national origin discrimination includes discrimination because of limited English proficiency (LEP). To ensure compliance with Title VI, you must take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to your programs [70 Fed.

Reg. 74087 (2005)];
• Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you from discriminating because of sex in education programs or activities (20 USC § 1681, et seq).

Compliance with Nondiscrimination Requirements:

During the performance of this contract, the Contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the “Contractor”), agrees as follows:

1. Compliance with Regulations: The Contractor (hereinafter includes consultants) will comply with the Title VI List of Pertinent Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities, as they may be amended from time to time, which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract.

2. Nondiscrimination: The Contractor, with regard to the work performed by it during the contract, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin (including limited English proficiency), creed, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), age, or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment. The Contractor will not participate directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by the Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities, including employment practices when the contract covers any activity, project, or program set forth in Appendix B of 49 CFR part 21.

3. Solicitations for Subcontracts, including Procurements of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations, either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the Contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials, or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier will be notified by the Contractor of the contractor’s obligations under this contract and the Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities on the grounds of race, color, or national origin.

4. Information and Reports: The Contractor will provide all information and reports required by the Acts, the Regulations, and directives issued pursuant thereto and will permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the Sponsor or the Federal Aviation Administration to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities and instructions. Where any information required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or 80 Item 4.

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on May 24, 2023 Page 4
refuses to furnish the information, the Contractor will so certify to the Sponsor or the Federal Aviation Administration, as appropriate, and will set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.

5. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of a Contractor’s noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this contract, the Sponsor will impose such contract sanctions as it or the Federal Aviation Administration may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to:
a. Withholding payments to the Contractor under the contract until the Contractor complies; and/or
b. Cancelling, terminating, or suspending a contract, in whole or in part.

6. Incorporation of Provisions: The Contractor will include the provisions of paragraphs one through six in every subcontract, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Acts, the Regulations, and directives issued pursuant thereto. The Contractor will take action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the Sponsor or the Federal Aviation Administration may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, that if the Contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with litigation by a subcontractor, or supplier because of such direction, the Contractor may request the Sponsor to enter into any litigation to protect the interests of the Sponsor. In addition, the Contractor may request the United States to enter into the litigation to protect the interests of the United States.

5. CLEAN AIR AND WATER POLLUTION CONTROL
2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(G)
42 USC § 7401, et seq
33 USC § 1251, et seq

CLEAN AIR AND WATER POLLUTION CONTROL
Contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, and regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 USC §§ 7401-7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 USC §§ 1251-1387). The Contractor agrees to report any violation to the Owner immediately upon discovery.

The Owner assumes responsibility for notifying the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Federal Aviation Administration.

Contractor must include this requirement in all subcontracts that exceed $150,000.

6. CONTRACT WORKHOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS ACT

REQUIREMENTS
2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(E)
2 CFR § 5.5(b)
40 USC § 3702
40 USC § 3704
81 Item 4.

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on May 24, 2023 Page 5

CONTRACT WORKHOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS ACT REQUIREMENTS

1. Overtime Requirements.

No contractor or subcontractor contracting for any part of the contract work which may require or involve the employment of laborers or mechanics shall require or permit any such laborer or mechanic, including watchmen and guards, in any workweek in which he or she is employed on such work to work in excess of forty hours in such workweek unless such laborer or mechanic receives compensation at a rate not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty hours in such workweek.

2. Violation; Liability for Unpaid Wages; Liquidated Damages.

In the event of any violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this clause, the Contractor and any subcontractor responsible therefor shall be liable for the unpaid wages. In addition, such contractor and subcontractor shall be liable to the United States (in the case of work done under contract for the District of Columbia or a territory, to such District or to such territory), for liquidated damages. Such liquidated damages shall be computed with respect to each individual laborer or mechanic, including watchmen and guards, employed in violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this clause, in the sum of $29 for each calendar day on which such individual was required or permitted to work in excess of the standard workweek of forty hours without payment of the overtime wages required by the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this clause.

3. Withholding for Unpaid Wages and Liquidated Damages.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or the Owner shall upon its own action or upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor withhold or cause to be withheld, from any moneys payable on account of work performed by the contractor or subcontractor under any such contract or any other Federal contract with the same prime contractor, or any other federally-assisted contract subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, which is held by the same prime contractor, such sums as may be determined to be necessary to satisfy any liabilities of such contractor or subcontractor for unpaid wages and liquidated damages as provided in the clause set forth in paragraph (2) of this clause.

4. Subcontractors.

The Contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clauses set forth in paragraphs (1) through (4) and also a clause requiring the subcontractor to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime contractor shall be responsible for compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with the clauses set forth in paragraphs (1) through (4) of this clause. 82 Item 4.

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on May 24, 2023 Page 6

7. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
2 CFR Part 180 (Subpart B)
2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(H)
2 CFR Part 1200
DOT Order 4200.5
Executive Orders 12549 and 12689

CERTIFICATION OF LOWER TIER CONTRACTORS REGARDING DEBARMENT The successful bidder, by administering each lower tier subcontract that exceeds $25,000 as a “covered transaction”, must confirm each lower tier participant of a “covered transaction” under the project is not presently debarred or otherwise disqualified from participation in this federally-assisted project. The successful bidder will accomplish this by:

1. Checking the System for Award Management at website: http://www.sam.gov.

2. Collecting a certification statement similar to the Certification of Offeror /Bidder Regarding Debarment, above.

3. Inserting a clause or condition in the covered transaction with the lower tier contract.

If the Federal Aviation Administration later determines that a lower tier participant failed to disclose to a higher tier participant that it was excluded or disqualified at the time it entered the covered transaction, the FAA may pursue any available remedies, including suspension and debarment of the non-compliant participant.

8. DI SADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
49 CFR Part 26
Contract Assurance (49 CFR § 26.13)
The Contractor, subrecipient or subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. The Contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR part 26 in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the Contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy as the recipient deems appropriate, which may include, but is not limited to:
1) Withholding monthly progress payments;
2) Assessing sanctions;
3) Liquidated damages; and/or
4) Disqualifying the Contractor from future bidding as non-responsible. 83 Item 4.

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on May 24, 2023 Page 7
Prompt Payment (49 CFR § 26.29)
The prime contractor agrees to pay each subcontractor under this prime contract for satisfactory performance of its contract no later than 7 days from the receipt of each payment the prime contractor receives from City of Oroville. The prime contractor agrees further to return retainage payments to each subcontractor within 7 days after the subcontractor’s work is satisfactorily completed. Any delay or postponement of payment from the above referenced time frame may occur only for good cause following written approval of the City of Oroville. This clause applies to both DBE and non-DBE subcontractors.

Termination of DBE Subcontracts (49 CFR § 26.53(f))
The prime contractor must not terminate a DBE subcontractor (or an approved substitute DBE firm) without prior written consent of City of Oroville. This includes, but is not limited to, instances in which the prime contractor seeks to perform work originally designated for a DBE subcontractor with its own forces or those of an affiliate, a non-DBE firm, or with another DBE firm.

The prime contractor shall utilize the specific DBEs listed to perform the work and supply the materials for which each is listed unless the contractor obtains written consent City of Oroville. Unless City of Oroville consent is provided, the prime contractor shall not be entitled to any payment for work or material unless it is performed or supplied by the listed DBE.

City of Oroville may provide such written consent only if City of Oroville agrees, for reasons stated in the concurrence document, that the prime contractor has good cause to terminate the DBE firm. For purposes of this paragraph, good cause includes the circumstances listed in 49 CFR §26.53.

Before transmitting to City of Oroville its request to terminate and/or substitute a DBE subcontractor, the prime contractor must give notice in writing to the DBE subcontractor, with a copy to City of Oroville, of its intent to request to terminate and/or substitute, and the reason for the request.

The prime contractor must give the DBE five days to respond to the prime contractor's notice and advise City of Oroville and the contractor of the reasons, if any, why it objects to the proposed termination of its subcontract and why City of Oroville should not approve the prime contractor's action. If required in a particular case as a matter of public necessity (e.g., safety), City of Oroville may provide a response period shorter than five days.

In addition to post-award terminations, the provisions of this section apply to preaward deletions of or substitutions for DBE firms put forward by offerors in negotiated procurements. 84 Item 4.

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on May 24, 2023 Page 8

9. DISTRACTED DRIVING
Executive Order 13513
DOT Order 3902.10

TEXTING WHEN DRIVING
In accordance with Executive Order 13513, “Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving”, (10/1/2009) and DOT Order 3902.10, “Text Messaging While Driving”, (12/30/2009), the Federal Aviation Administration encourages recipients of Federal grant funds to adopt and enforce safety policies that decrease crashes by distracted drivers, including policies to ban text messaging while driving when performing work related to a grant or subgrant.

In support of this initiative, the Owner encourages the Contractor to promote policies and initiatives for its employees and other work personnel that decrease crashes by distracted drivers, including policies that ban text messaging while driving motor vehicles while performing work activities associated with the project. The Contractor must include the substance of this clause in all sub-tier contracts exceeding $10,000 that involve driving a motor vehicle in performance of work activities associated with the project.

10. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO

SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT
2 CFR § 200, Appendix II(K)
2 CFR § 200.216

PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE

SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT
Contractor and Subcontractor agree to comply with mandatory standards and policies relating to use and procurement of certain telecommunications and video surveillance services or equipment in compliance with the National Defense Authorization Act [Public Law 115-232 § 889(f)(1)].

11. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO)
2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(C)
41 CFR § 60-1.4
41 CFR § 60-4.3
Executive Order 11246

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY CLAUSE
During the performance of this contract, the Contractor agrees as follows:
(1) The Contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identify, or 85 Item 4.

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on May 24, 2023 Page 9
national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff, or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. (2) The Contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. (3) The contractor will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the contractor's legal duty to furnish information. (4) The Contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided by the agency contracting officer, advising the labor union or workers’ representative of the Contractor’s commitments under this section 202 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. (5) The Contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. (6) The Contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by the rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the contracting agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders.
(7) In the event of the Contractor’s noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any such rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. (8) The Contractor will include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The Contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as may be directed by the Secretary of Labor as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance: Provided, however, that in the event the contractor becomes 86 Item 4.

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on May 24, 2023 Page 10
involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction, the Contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States.

12. FEDERAL FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT (FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGE) 29 USC § 201, et seq
2 CFR § 200.430
All contracts and subcontracts that result from this solicitation incorporate by reference the provisions of 29 CFR part 201, et seq, the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), with the same force and effect as if given in full text. The FLSA sets minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards for full and part-time workers.

The Consultant has full responsibility to monitor compliance to the referenced statute or regulation. The Consultant must address any claims or disputes that arise from this requirement directly with the U.S.

Department of Labor – Wage and Hour Division.

13. LOBBYING AND INFLUENCING FEDERAL EMPLOYEES
31 USC § 1352 – Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment
2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(I)
49 CFR Part 20, Appendix A

CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING
The Bidder or Offeror certifies by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the Bidder or Offeror, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub-awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under 87 Item 4.

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on May 24, 2023 Page 11
grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all sub-recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

14. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970
29 CFR Part 1910
All contracts and subcontracts that result from this solicitation incorporate by reference the requirements of 29 CFR Part 1910 with the same force and effect as if given in full text. The employer must provide a work environment that is free from recognized hazards that may cause death or serious physical harm to the employee. The employer retains full responsibility to monitor its compliance and their subcontractor’s compliance with the applicable requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 CFR Part 1910). The employer must address any claims or disputes that pertain to a referenced requirement directly with the U.S. Department of Labor – Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

15. TAX DELINQUENCY AND FELONY CONVICTIONS
Section 8113 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (Public Law 117-103) and similar provisions in subsequent appropriations acts.

DOT Order 4200.6 – Appropriations Act Requirements for Procurement and Non-Procurement Regarding Tax Delinquency and Felony Convictions

CERTIFICATION OF OFFEROR/BIDDER REGARDING TAX DELINQUENCY AND

FELONY CONVICTIONS
The applicant must complete the following two certification statements. The applicant must indicate its current status as it relates to tax delinquency and felony conviction by inserting a checkmark () in the space following the applicable response. The applicant agrees that, if awarded a contract resulting from this solicitation, it will incorporate this provision for certification in all lower tier subcontracts.

Certifications
The applicant represents that it is ( ) is not ( ) a corporation that has any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability.

The applicant represents that it is ( ) is not ( ) a corporation that was convicted of a criminal violation under any Federal law within the preceding 24 months.

Note
If an applicant responds in the affirmative to either of the above representations, the applicant is ineligible to receive an award unless the Sponsor has received notification from the agency suspension and 88 Item 4.

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on May 24, 2023 Page 12
debarment official (SDO) that the SDO has considered suspension or debarment and determined that further action is not required to protect the Government’s interests. The applicant therefore must provide information to the owner about its tax liability or conviction to the Owner, who will then notify the FAA Airports District Office, which will then notify the agency’s SDO to facilitate completion of the required considerations before award decisions are made.

Term Definitions
Felony conviction: Felony conviction means a conviction within the preceding twenty four (24) months of a felony criminal violation under any Federal law and includes conviction of an offense defined in a section of the U.S. Code that specifically classifies the offense as a felony and conviction of an offense that is classified as a felony under 18 USC § 3559.

Tax Delinquency: A tax delinquency is any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted, or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability.

16. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT
2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(B)
FAA Advisory Circular 150/5370-10, Section 80-09

TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE (PROFESSIONAL SERVICES)
The Owner may, by written notice to the Consultant, terminate this Agreement for its convenience and without cause or default on the part of Consultant. Upon receipt of the notice of termination, except as explicitly directed by the Owner, the Contractor must immediately discontinue all services affected.

Upon termination of the Agreement, the Consultant must deliver to the Owner all data, surveys, models, drawings, specifications, reports, maps, photographs, estimates, summaries, and other documents and materials prepared by the Engineer under this contract, whether complete or partially complete.

Owner agrees to make just and equitable compensation to the Consultant for satisfactory work completed up through the date the Consultant receives the termination notice. Compensation will not include anticipated profit on non-performed services.

Owner further agrees to hold Consultant harmless for errors or omissions in documents that are incomplete as a result of the termination action under this clause.

TERMINATION FOR CAUSE (PROFESSIONAL SERVICES)
Either party may terminate this Agreement for cause if the other party fails to fulfill its obligations that are essential to the completion of the work per the terms and conditions of the Agreement. The party initiating the termination action must allow the breaching party an opportunity to dispute or cure the breach.

The terminating party must provide the breaching party [7] days advance written notice of its intent to terminate the Agreement. The notice must specify the nature and extent of the breach, the conditions necessary to cure the breach, and the effective date of the termination action. The rights and remedies in this clause are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this agreement. 89 Item 4.

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on May 24, 2023 Page 13
a) Termination by Owner: The Owner may terminate this Agreement for cause in whole or in part, for the failure of the Consultant to:

1. Perform the services within the time specified in this contract or by Owner approved extension;

2. Make adequate progress so as to endanger satisfactory performance of the Project; or

3. Fulfill the obligations of the Agreement that are essential to the completion of the Project.

Upon receipt of the notice of termination, the Consultant must immediately discontinue all services affected unless the notice directs otherwise. Upon termination of the Agreement, the Consultant must deliver to the Owner all data, surveys, models, drawings, specifications, reports, maps, photographs, estimates, summaries, and other documents and materials prepared by the Engineer under this contract, whether complete or partially complete.

Owner further agrees to hold Consultant harmless for errors or omissions in documents that are incomplete as a result of the termination action under this clause.

If, after finalization of the termination action, the Owner determines the Consultant was not in default of the Agreement, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the Owner issued the termination for the convenience of the Owner.
b) Termination by Consultant: The Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause in whole or in part, if the Owner:

1. Defaults on its obligations under this Agreement;

2. Fails to make payment to the Consultant in accordance with the terms of this Agreement;

3. Suspends the project for more than [180] days due to reasons beyond the control of the Consultant.

Upon receipt of a notice of termination from the Consultant, Owner agrees to cooperate with Consultant for the purpose of terminating the agreement or portion thereof, by mutual consent. If Owner and Consultant cannot reach mutual agreement on the termination settlement, the Consultant may, without prejudice to any rights and remedies it may have, proceed with terminating all or parts of this Agreement based upon the Owner’s breach of the contract.

In the event of termination due to Owner breach, the Consultant is entitled to invoice Owner and to receive full payment for all services performed or furnished in accordance with this Agreement and all justified reimbursable expenses incurred by the Consultant through the effective date of termination action. Owner agrees to hold Consultant harmless for errors or omissions in documents that are incomplete as a result of the termination action under this clause. 90 Item 4.

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on May 24, 2023 Page 14

17. TRADE RESTRICTION CERTIFICATION
49 USC § 50104
49 CFR Part 30

TRADE RESTRICTION CERTIFICATION
By submission of an offer, the Offeror certifies that with respect to this solicitation and any resultant contract, the Offeror –
1) is not owned or controlled by one or more citizens of a foreign country included in the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms as published by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR);
2) has not knowingly entered into any contract or subcontract for this project with a person that is a citizen or national of a foreign country included on the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms as published by the USTR; and
3) has not entered into any subcontract for any product to be used on the Federal project that is produced in a foreign country included on the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms published by the USTR.

This certification concerns a matter within the jurisdiction of an agency of the United States of America and the making of a false, fictitious, or fraudulent certification may render the maker subject to prosecution under Title 18 USC § 1001.

The Offeror/Contractor must provide immediate written notice to the Owner if the Offeror/Contractor learns that its certification or that of a subcontractor was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. The Contractor must require subcontractors provide immediate written notice to the Contractor if at any time it learns that its certification was erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

Unless the restrictions of this clause are waived by the Secretary of Transportation in accordance with 49 CFR § 30.17, no contract shall be awarded to an Offeror or subcontractor:
1) who is owned or controlled by one or more citizens or nationals of a foreign country included on the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms published by the USTR; or 2) whose subcontractors are owned or controlled by one or more citizens or nationals of a foreign country on such USTR list; or
3) who incorporates in the public works project any product of a foreign country on such USTR list.

Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by this provision. The knowledge and information of a contractor is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

The Offeror agrees that, if awarded a contract resulting from this solicitation, it will incorporate this provision for certification without modification in all lower tier subcontracts. The Contractor may rely on the certification of a prospective subcontractor that it is not a firm from a foreign country included on the 91 Item 4.

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on May 24, 2023 Page 15
list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms as published by USTR, unless the Offeror has knowledge that the certification is erroneous.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when making an award. If it is later determined that the Contractor or subcontractor knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) may direct through the Owner cancellation of the contract or subcontract for default at no cost to the Owner or the FAA.

18. VETERAN’S PREFERENCE
49 USC § 47112(c)
In the employment of labor (excluding executive, administrative, and supervisory positions), the Contractor and all sub-tier contractors must give preference to covered veterans as defined within Title 49 United States Code Section 47112. Covered veterans include Vietnam-era veterans, Persian Gulf veterans, Afghanistan-Iraq war veterans, disabled veterans, and small business concerns (as defined by 15 USC § 632) owned and controlled by disabled veterans. This preference only applies when there are covered veterans readily available and qualified to perform the work to which the employment relates.

19. DOMESTIC PREFERENCES FOR PROCUREMENTS
2 CFR § 200.322
2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(L)

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DOMESTIC PREFERENCES FOR PROCUREMENTS The Bidder or Offeror certifies by signing and submitting this bid or proposal that, to the greatest extent practicable, the Bidder or Offeror has provided a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including, but not limited to, iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products) in compliance with 2 CFR § 200.322. 92 Item 4.

BRANDLEY
DATE OF SUBMISSION: February 7, 2025

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT

PROJECTS FOR THE

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
93 Item 4.
94 Item 4.

BRANDLEY ENGINEERING, INC.

Section 1 Statement of Qualifications 1-1
1-1 General Qualifications 1-1
1-2 Experience 1-3
1-3 Working with Governmental Agencies 1-8
1-4 Supporting Information 1-9
1-5 Demonstrated Ability to Respond Quickly 1-9
Section 2 Staff and Subconsultant Qualifications 2-1
2-1 Organizational Structure 2-1
2-2 Resumes 2-3
Section 3 Approach to Projects 3-1
3-1 Airport Design 3-1
3-2 Construction Management 3-2
3-3 Airfield Pavements 3-4
3-4 Pavement Maintenance Management Plans (PMMP) 3-4
3-5 Airport Capital Improvement Plan (ACIP) Maintenance 3-6 3-6 AIP Grant Administration 3-6
3-7 Understanding and Familiarity with Oroville
Municipal Airport 3-7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CITY OF OROVILLE

STATEMENT OF

QUALIFICATIONS

ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR

AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS FOR THE

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
95 Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 1-1

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
SECTION 1
1-1 GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS
The City of Oroville is requesting statements of qualifications from qualified airport Architectural/Engineering firms for projects planned at the Oroville Municipal Airport over the next five years. Services required will be development and preparation of the Airport Capital Improvement Plan (ACIP), preparation of applications for Federal Aviation Administration Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grant funding, airport and aviation-related design and engineering services as required by the City to include, but not be limited to: geotechnical studies , pavement evaluation studies, drainage studies, airport design and engineering, value engineering, cost estimating, development of plans and specifications, bid documents, project coordination, construction engineering services including resident engineering, testing and inspection of all contractor operations during construction of the specific projects, and other miscellaneous airport Architectural/Engineering consulting services required by the City.

Brandley Engineering, Inc. is a consulting airport engineering office with one hundred percent of our business devoted to airport grant administration, planning, environmental, design, engineering, and construction management services for all types of airport development projects. Reinard W. Brandley, P.E., founded the firm in 1953, and operated the firm under Reinard W.

Brandley, Consulting Airport Engineer, until 2020 at which time it was transitioned to an S Corporation, Brandley Engineering Inc., with ownership by Melissa Brandley and Damon Brandley. Brandley Engineering has performed airport grant administration, engineering design, construction management and airport planning services for over 70 years. The upcoming projects at the Oroville Municipal Airport fit within our primary area of focus and expertise.

Brandley Engineering have been providing engineering and construction management services to the City of Oroville for projects at the Oroville Municipal Airport since 1985. Our office has intimate knowledge of the pavements, soil, and environmental conditions at this airport and can provide engineering design and construction management services to the City without the need for extensive data gathering and research. Examples of engineering and construction management projects completed for the Oroville Municipal Airport include:
• Overlay Runway 2-20 (1985)
• Overlay Runway 13-31, Taxiway C, Runway 2-20 Medium Intensity Runway Lighting system, Security Fencing (1989) • Extension of Runway 2-20 (1993). This project required detailed environmental studies including wetlands and biological studies. • Runway 12-30 Overlay and Lighting Rehabilitation., Widen and Overlay Taxiway S (2005) • Crack Seal Pavements – Runway 2-20 and Runway 13-31, Remark Pavements, Change Runway Number Designations including replacing sign panels (2011)
• Install New Runway 20 REILs and Wind Cone (2012)
• Reconstruct North Side Apron (2013)
• Runway 2-20 Drainage Improvements, Runway 20 Runway Safety Area (RSA) Grading (2016) • Install PAPI and REIL Runway 02 (2016)
• Construct Taxiway K (2018)
• Crack Seal Runway 2-20 and Associated Taxiways (2022) In 2024 Brandley Engineering prepared the engineering design, plans, and specifications for the Crack Seal of the pavements on Taxiway L, North Tie Down Apron; South Tie Down Apron, and Tee Hangar Taxilanes. This project was bid in 2024, and the City is awaiting an FAA grant to proceed with the construction. Brandley Engineering is ready to perform the construction management services for this project.

Our office prepared Pavement Maintenance Management Plans/Pavement Evaluation Studies for the Oroville Municipal Airport in 2012 and 2020 and is very knowledgeable of the soil and pavement conditions at this airport.

Our office prepared the Oroville Municipal Airport Master Plan in 1990 and the Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Update for Oroville Municipal Airport in 2013. We are currently preparing an Airport Layout Plan Update with AGIS for the Oroville Municipal Airport.

These Master Plan and ALP Updates provide Brandley Engineering with the background knowledge of the Airport’s deficiencies, needs, and priorities to best plan future projects and put forth the optimum justification to gain FAA funding support for the projects. 96 Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 1-2 OROVILLE’S AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (ACIP) STRATEGY We have been planning the Oroville Municipal Airport’s Airport Capital Improvement Plan (ACIP) since 1985. The current FAA funding environment has become increasingly competitive requiring solid project justification and need for urgency to successfully gain FAA funding support for large discretionary projects such as the upcoming 2027 design and 2029 construction of the Rehabilitation of Runway 2-20 at Oroville Municipal Airport. Brandley Engineering has the background knowledge and a solid strategy essential to keeping this important project timeline on track while also preserving the other portions of the airport.

Our strategy for the Oroville Municipal Airport ACIP is to place the highest priority on the Rehabilitate Runway 2-20 project as this is the primary runway which is currently exhibiting significant surface distress in the form or cracking. Additional delays in this project’s funding timeline will accelerate the surface deterioration, causing additional short term maintenance costs to an already stretched Airport budget and risk damage to aircraft utilizing this runway due to uncontrolled and accelerating FOD. Our strategy to preserve this project’s funding timeline includes careful budgeting to allocate the maximum $600,000 available entitlement funds to the expensive construction phase to reduce the large discretionary funding ask as much as possible and careful strategizing to give this project the maximum competitive advantage to compete for the large discretionary funding required for the construction phase of this important project.

The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) funding has allocated $137,000 to $159,000 per year for 2022 thru 2026 to Oroville Municipal Airport. This money is available to fund a variety of needs. Brandley Engineering’s expertise allows us to optimize the project prioritization of this funding source. For Oroville Municipal Airport, the BIL funding has been prioritized toward the Airport’s Rehabilitate Runway 2-20 design in order to demonstrate to the FAA the City’s importance of this project. FAA is not favorable to AIP funding of design projects which do not have discretionary funding available for the construction within a few years of the design. By funding the design with BIL funding, the Oroville runway project construction phase is bumped up the priority list above other Airport’s who did not receive AIP funding for their design due to limited construction funding availability. With this strategy, Brandley Engineering has prioritized this important project in a way that minimizes the potential for timeline slippage due to FAA funding shortfalls.

There are some AIP entitlement funds and BIL funds which will expire prior to the Rehabilitate Runway 2-20 design and construction phases. Brandley Engineering has developed a strategy to best utilize these funds based on the needs of the Airport while also adhering to the expiring fund budget available in order to avoid taking additional funds away from the important Rehabilitate Runway 2-20 project. These funds have been prioritized for the crack sealing of aprons and taxilanes and remarking of Runway 13-31. This overall strategy has positioned the airport to prioritize the important Rehabilitate Runway 2-20 project while also preserving the portions of the airport which are not included in the Runway 2-20 project. With this strategy, the entire Oroville Municipal Airport is being preserved for the maximum pavement lives.

AIRPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES
Brandley Engineering has performed and supervised airport engineering design and construction management services on airport development projects for over 70 years. Our design and construction management staff consist of a team of qualified, experienced engineers and inspectors in all civil and electrical construction categories. Melissa Brandley, Damon Brandley and Tom Steinkamp, Airport Engineers in our office, collectively have over 50 years’ experience in design and construction management of airport development projects.

Our background in geotechnical engineering, pavement evaluation and design, and airport engineering and planning provides the experience and ability to make the best use of local materials and to provide a design that will create a long life, low maintenance project at reasonable initial cost.

Reinard Brandley’s research work toward his doctorate at Harvard University was on airfield pavement design and evaluation. It was from this research that he developed the Brandley Fatigue Analysis method of design of airfield pavements. Each section of pavement is evaluated and designed for the forecast aircraft operations anticipated on that section of pavement. This Brandley Fatigue Analysis methodology for evaluation and design of airfield pavements has a 70-year successful performance record with a 90 to 95 percent success rate. Mr. Brandley’s vast experience in geotechnical engineering and pavement design on airports 97 Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 1-3 has been passed on to Melissa Brandley and Damon Brandley. As a result, our office has extraordinary capabilities for the design and evaluation of airfield pavements.

This Brandley Fatigue Analysis methodology allows us to accurately forecast remaining pavement life of a pavement section under specific traffic use and to identify the pavement section or subgrade or subsoil section that is the cause of the forecast failure.

As a result of this analysis, we can identify when a pavement failure under specified traffic will occur, identify what pavement section item or subsoil will be responsible for the distress, clearly identify the pavement rehabilitation required to correct the deficiency, and provide a specified rehabilitation program and design for the pavement section. As a result of this Brandley Fatigue Analysis methodology, we can repair, rehabilitate, or reconstruct airfield pavements that will provide specified life under designated traffic. With this analysis we can design airfield pavement sections that will provide the specified performance and life at the least possible cost.
1-2 EXPERIENCE
Brandley Engineering has completed numerous airfield engineering and construction management assignments for general aviation airports that directly relate to the projects proposed at the Oroville Municipal Airport. For over 70 years we have provided a broad range of services to all sizes of airports throughout the United States. The projects described on the next several pages have included the types of services that will be required during the engineering and construction management for Airport Development Projects at the Oroville Municipal Airport.

The projects described below were of similar nature and magnitude to those anticipated by the City of Oroville. For all projects our office provided full grant administration services including preparation of project applications to the FAA, engineering design including preparation of plans and specifications, filing all bid documentation with FAA in order to receive the grant and authorization to award the contract, conducting preconstruction conferences, preparation of all requests for reimbursement to the FAA, filing all reports and submittals with the FAA and State, and preparation of final reports and record drawings in order to close out the grants. All projects were funded by the Federal Aviation Administration. 98 Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 1-4 The pavements at Oroville Municipal Airport are old and have developed moderate cracking. The cracks were sealed in 2011.

The existing sealant on Runway 2-20 and associated taxiways had deteriorated and new cracks had developed. The PCI was 50-60. In order to protect the underlying pavement layers from damage due to water infiltration, it was required to reseal the existing cracks and seal the new cracks. The crack sealing work on Runway 2-20 and associated taxiways was performed in 2022.

The pavement sections on Taxiway L, North Tie Down Apron, South Tie Down Apron, and Tee Hangar Taxilanes at Oroville Municipal Airport are old and have developed moderate cracking.

The cracks were sealed in 2011 but new cracks have since developed. In order to protect the underlying pavement layers from water infiltration, it is required to seal the cracks. The PCI of these pavements is 50 to 60. The engineering design of this project has been completed and it is proposed to construct this project in 2025.

For both crack sealing projects, the existing and new cracks were cleaned by water blasting and filled with new crack sealant material. The crack seal project dissected some existing surface markings. Therefore, all paved surfaces receiving crack sealing were remarked and black enhancement added where required by FAA standards.

CONTACT PERSON – Cody Nissen, Airport Manager, (530) 538- 2490, [email protected]
SERVICES PROVIDED – Crack surveys, engineering design
and preparation of plans, specifications, and reports, including Engineer’s Estimate, engineering services during bidding and contract award, construction management services including resident engineering and inspection.

CRACK SEAL RUNWAY 2-20 AND ASSOCIATED TAXIWAYS - 2022 CRACK SEAL TAXIWAY L, NORTH TIE DOWN APRON, SOUTH TIE DOWN APRON AND TEE HANGAR TAXILANES - 2024 OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT – CITY OF OROVILLE
This reconstruction consisted of the removal of the existing pavement, recompacting the existing base course, and placing new aggregate base course and new asphalt surface course, resulting in raising the runway 8 inches. A future planned runway widening on one side resulted in a cost benefit analysis of the location of the crown of the runway. It was decided an offset crown to align with the future runway centerline was the best option. A new pavement section was constructed as required to meet the new geometry requirements for cross taxiway fillets. The safety areas were regraded to meet FAA standards and provide adequate drainage.

The existing old direct burial runway lighting system was failing and going to ground. A new runway lighting system was installed, including new lights, cans, electrical duct, wire, and guidance signs. A new regulator was installed in the airfield electrical vault.

CONTACT PERSON – Robb Etnyre, General Manager, (530)
587-4119 x105, [email protected]
SERVICES PROVIDED – Topographic surveys, geotechnical
studies, engineering design and preparation of plans, specifications, and reports, including Engineer’s Estimate, engineering services during bidding and contract award, construction management services including resident engineering, testing, and inspection.

RECONSTRUCT EXISTING RUNWAY 2-20 INCLUDING RUNWAY LIGHTING TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT – TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT DISTRICT – 2022-2024 99 Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 1-5 The City of Tracy retained the services of Brandley Engineering to prepare a Pavement Maintenance Management Plan (PMMP) in 2012. This study showed severe cracking of the existing sections of pavement on the runways, taxiways, general aviation tie down apron, and tee hangar taxilanes. It was recommended that reconstruction of the pavements at this airport be completed as early as funding became available. Brandley Engineering prepared the engineering design, plans and specifications for the reconstruction of the runways, taxiways, the general aviation apron, and the tee hangar taxilanes such that plans and specifications were “on the shelf” ready to bid.

The reconstruction of airfield pavements at the Tracy Municipal Airport was performed in stages. The first stage was the reconstruction of the runways and taxiways. This project originally consisted of only the reconstruction of the Runway 12-30 and associated taxiways. During the bidding process, FAA determined they had the available funding to issue a grant for both runways and all taxiways. Brandley Engineering prepared an addendum to add the reconstruction of Runway 8-26 and associated taxiways as an additive alternate.

The second stage consisted of the reconstruction of the general aviation apron (608,900 sq. ft.) including grading, drainage, paving, marking, and tie downs. The third and final phase consisted of the reconstruction of the tee hangar taxilanes to the hangar area (718,470 sq. ft.). Existing drainage in the tee hangar development area was sheet flow over the total 300-foot width of the old landing strip at Tracy Municipal Airport. Each of the hangars flooded during any storms that occurred at the airport. The design of the reconstruction of the hangar taxilanes was prepared to eliminate this flooding within the buildings by regrading the pavements between the buildings such that they slope away from the buildings to a swale. New drain lines were installed as needed.

This project included significant drainage studies and design of a new drainage system for the entire airport including all runways, taxiways, infields, aircraft parking aprons and tee hangar areas.

CONTACT PERSON – Paula Jessup, Airport Manager, Tracy
Municipal Airport, (209) 831-6215, [email protected] SERVICES PROVIDED – Environmental document (Cat Ex),
topographic surveys, geotechnical studies, engineering design and preparation of plans, specifications, and reports, including Engineer’s Estimate, engineering services during bidding and contract award, construction management services including resident engineering, testing, and inspection, final project closeout with City and FAA.

RECONSTRUCT RUNWAYS AND TAXIWAYS, GENERAL AVIATION APRON,

AND TEE HANGAR TAXILANES
TRACY MUNICIPAL AIRPORT, OWNER - CITY OF TRACY, CALIFORNIA – 2015-2019 100
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 1-6 The Truckee Tahoe Airport District scheduled the reconstruction of the pavements on the parallel Taxiway A and cross taxiways in two phases. The east portion of the taxiway was reconstructed in 2016. The west portion of the taxiway was reconstructed in 2021.

These projects included excavation, stabilization of subgrade soils, pulverizing existing base course and asphalt and reusing as subbase course, grading, drainage, paving, marking, new solar powered taxiway edge lights and new guidance signs.

During the Phase 2 project, discussions were held with the FAA NAS Planning and Integration team regarding the FAA pull boxes for the REIL which were located in Taxiway Safety Areas and did not meet FAA current standards. It was determined that the most cost-effective solution was to replace the existing conduit and pull boxes and realign the conduit run so that it was a more direct routing with fewer taxiway crossings. This work was included in this project.

CONTACT PERSON – Robb Etnyre, General Manager, (530)
587-4119 x105, [email protected]
SERVICES PROVIDED – Environmental document (Cat Ex),
topographic surveys, geotechnical studies, engineering design and preparation of plans, specifications, and reports, including Engineer’s Estimate, engineering services during bidding and contract award, construction management services including resident engineering, testing, and inspection, final project closeout with District and FAA.

RECONSTRUCT TAXIWAY A AND CROSS TAXIWAYS PHASES 1 AND 2 TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT – TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT DISTRICT - 2016-2021 RECONSTRUCT AND WIDEN RUNWAY 17-35, EXIT PAVEMENTS, AND AIRFIELD LIGHTING UNIVERSITY AIRPORT, DAVIS, CALIFORNIA – 2021-2024
R/W 17-35 was reconstructed and widened by 10 feet on the east side including a reconstructed and new widened pavement section and blast pads. This project required grading and stabilization of the RSA and replacement of the existing non-standard runway lighting system with a new lighting system including new duct, cable, light bases, lights, REIL, PAPI and segmented circle and wind cone. The project also included replacing the existing electrical “closet” with a new stand-alone electrical vault building.

CONTACT PERSON – Alex Cain, Project Manager, (530) 564- 2341, [email protected]
SERVICES PROVIDED – Topographic surveys, geotechnical
studies, engineering design and preparation of plans, specifications, and reports, including Engineer’s Estimate, engineering services during bidding and contract award, construction management services including resident engineering, testing, and inspection. 101
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 1-7 A matrix showing representative airport engineering and construction management tasks performed by Brandley Engineering over the past 10 years is included below.

Alturas Municipal Airport
Beckwourth - Nervino Airport
Bryant Field
Chester - Rogers Field
Chico Municipal Airport
Chowchilla Municipal Airport
Colusa County Airport
Fresno Chandler Executive Airport
Georgetown Airport
Lake Tahoe Airport
Lampson Field Airport
Lincoln Regional Airport
Madera Municipal Airport
Mammoth Yosemite Airport
Nevada County Airport
Oroville Municipal Airport
Placerville Airport
Quincy - Gansner Field
Sacramento Executive Airport
Sacramento Mather Airport
Sacramento International Airport
Stockton Metropolitan Airport
Tracy Municipal Airport
Truckee Tahoe Airport
Tulelake Municipal Airport
University Airport - Davis
Visalia Municipal Airport
Watsonville Municipal Airport
Representative Design & Construction Management - 2013 Through 2024 AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS LIGHTING AND SIGNAGE ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS NAVAIDS FENCING/ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS DRAINAGE FUELING

CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT
102
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 1-8 1-3 WORKING WITH GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
The office of Brandley Engineering has worked with, and personally knows, key Federal Aviation Administration personnel in District, Regional and Headquarters offices. One hundred percent of our work is for airports assigned to the FAA SFO ADO. The longevity and reputation of our firm has resulted in a very close relationship with the FAA staff at the San Francisco ADO and Western Pacific Region. In fact, we have worked with most of the FAA San Francisco ADO staff for the majority of their careers at the FAA. This long and close working relationship with the FAA SF ADO, including Jeffrey Spener, Reginald Dones, and David Wickens, allows us easy access to members of the staff for quick and responsive coordination and reviews of all projects. This close relationship provides us with the knowledge of each staff member’s expectations, allows us to craft documents for our clients that anticipate the potential FAA roadblocks and address them before they become an issue.

Our close working relationship with District, Regional and Headquarters Offices of the FAA allows us easy access to all members of the staff for quick and responsive coordination and reviews of all projects. This excellent relationship also enables our office to be in the unique position of being made aware of when airport improvement and planning funds are available to our clients.

When funds are made available, we act quickly to coordinate with our clients on how to maximize the use of these funds and prepare applications to the FAA for improvement or planning grants.

We are familiar with all FAA requirements and have assisted in the review and writing of many of the Advisory Circulars pertaining to engineering design and construction management. This close working relationship enables us to coordinate with FAA to navigate any engineering design or construction challenge, simplifies coordination, reviews, approvals and funding availability.

Ninety-five percent of the work performed by our office is funded by the FAA. All projects listed in this section of the Statement of Interest and Qualifications were funded under an FAA AIP or BIL/AIG grant.

The experience of our firm in working with all branches of the Federal Aviation Administration for over 70 years has enabled all staff members to be very familiar with
procedures, regulations, funding, and all other aspects pertaining to airport architectural/engineering and
construction management services. All staff members
are kept up to date on all FAA Advisory Circulars and
Planning Guidelines.

Our office keeps up to date on all policies and procedures of the FAA on the following:
• Preparation and submittal of Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP) and grant applications. • Review process of plans and specifications.
• Pavement Maintenance Management Plans (PMMP)
• Environmental processes for design and construction projects • Construction management requirements
• Project and grant closeout.
• FAA policies and grant compliance requirements
By being up to date on these policies, we are an asset to our clients in submitting required documents accurately and within a timely manner.

Brandley Engineering works closely with Caltrans Division of Aeronautics and is up to date with Caltrans policies on matching grants, policies, and regulations. When our clients receive FAA grants, our office assists them with preparing the Caltrans matching grant applications so that they receive their 5% match on their AIP grants. In addition, when Caltrans performs Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airport Master Record (FAA Form 5010-1) update and State permit compliance inspections, our office assists our clients with interpreting, troubleshooting, and negotiating any issues identified in these inspections. These issues often include obstructions to various surfaces, incorrect markings, pavement deficiencies, and required updates to the Airport Master Record. Brandley Engineering works with our clients and Caltrans to solve these issues and bring their airports into compliance.

Brandley Engineering has the expertise and experience to ensure smooth, timely and cooperative FAA and Caltrans approvals of all development projects for Oroville Municipal Airport.

Mr. Brandley, as well as his team, have extensive
experience with the FAA AIP Grant program
and has assisted the District successfully to
complete many FAA AIP Grant Projects.
~Kevin Smith - Former General Manager, Truckee Airport
103
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 1-9 1-4 SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Brandley Engineering has provided airport engineering and construction management services for over 70 years and for the Oroville Municipal Airport for the last 40 years. We have committed our Project Manager, Melissa Brandley, to fully address the needs of the Airport for the full term of the assignment. Ms. Brandley is supported by talented airport engineers and inspectors and by environmental and electrical engineering specialists and senior quality control engineers. All of the Brandley Engineering staff has an extensive working knowledge of the Oroville Municipal Airport, its relationship with the FAA and the tasks required to complete Airport engineering and construction management projects within the proposed schedules. A detailed staffing plan and qualifications and resumes of staff members is provided in Section 2 of this Statement of Qualifications.

The Brandley Engineering team of seasoned professionals brings more than 70 years of airport engineering and construction management experience. We place a high importance on preparing clearly written documents based on a thorough knowledge of the Airport and using sound reasoning clearly explained, rigorous quality control and a solid airport engineering foundation. 1-5 DEMONSTRATED ABILITY TO RESPOND QUICKLY
Brandley Engineering is available and committed to provide engineering and construction management services to the City of Oroville for the Oroville Municipal Airport over the next five years. We have been providing these services to the City since 1985 and will continue to work with the City on the important development planned for the Oroville Municipal Airport.

It is understood that responsiveness is of the essence. The Brandley Engineering Team’s ability to complete projects in a timely and efficient manner centers around the development of a qualified staff which works together as an efficient team and an organized approach to anticipate and avoid potential stumbling blocks which can result in costly delays. Project staffing workload in our office is largely controlled by limiting the number and type of projects to which we submit proposals and by minor adjustments to staffing. We do not respond to every RFQ as we understand that doing so would jeopardize our ability to provide the quality service our company is known for to our existing clients. However, as Oroville is one of our longest standing clients, we have reserved space in our workload to provide the time and attention required for the projects anticipated at Oroville Municipal Airport.

The Brandley Engineering Team’s ability to complete projects in a timely and efficient manner centers around the development of a qualified staff which works together as an efficient team and an organized approach to anticipate and avoid potential stumbling blocks which can result in costly delays. Our approach to airport engineering and design projects starts with placing a high importance on maintaining consistent involvement and communication with the client and the FAA staff at the San Francisco ADO and Regional Offices.

All members of the Brandley staff can begin work immediately following contract execution as needed on Oroville Municipal Airport projects. We schedule the work as soon as we receive authorization to proceed on a project and hold weekly meetings to ensure all projects are being completed on time and within budget.

Melissa will continue to be the point of contact for all airport engineering design and construction performed for the Oroville Municipal Airport. Our team understands the importance of responding quickly to client and FAA questions and requests and can make ourselves available for in person meetings, Zoom meetings, or phone calls with short notice.

The office of Brandley Engineering has a proven track record of producing projects on time and within budget. Our track record with FAA of successfully meeting very tight schedules has resulted in FAA’s confidence to offer last minute funding to our clients.

One example of our demonstrated ability to meet difficult schedules and timelines is as follows:

The Regents of the University of California Davis planned the Reconstruct and Widen Runway 17-35, Runway Safety Area Grading and Electrical Improvements project at the University Airport for construction in 2021. They signed a contract and issued a Work Authorization for Brandley Engineering for the engineering design of this project on October 7, 2020. To meet FAA funding deadlines the project needed to be advertised for bids in February of 2021.

Brandley completed the preliminary design and submitted preliminary plans and specification for the project on December 1, 2020 (less than 2 months after receiving the Work Authorization). This placed Brandley Engineering on track to have a complete bid ready package by end of January 2021. However, on December 8, 2020, FAA notified the Airport that 104
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 1-10 construction discretionary funding for this project was not available for the 2021 AIP grant cycle. Brandley Engineering then worked with the Airport to re-strategize the funding priorities for the available entitlement funds and identified the Beacon Replacement and a Pavement Maintenance Management Plan as the most viable projects. The timeline for the design of the Beacon Replacement project was critical and required complete bid ready plans and specifications by middle of February 2021.

Brandley Engineering received authorization to begin design of the Beacon Replacement project on December 8, 2020.

Design included geotechnical studies, investigation of the existing beacon electrical system, investigation of existing utilities in the vicinity of the new beacon tower, layout and design of the new beacon tower, aeronautical analysis to establish the new beacon tower height and design of a new electrical system serving the beacon including vault work, new duct, cable, photocell, relays etc. Special care was taken to ensure all new electrical items met fire code compliance requirements related to the proximity of an existing propane tank near the new beacon tower location. The engineering design including complete bid ready plans, specifications and engineers report were completed and advertised for bids on February 14, 2021. Bids were opened on March 2, 2021, and Notice to Proceed issued to the contractor on March 31, 2021. University Airport was able to proceed with this important project as a direct result of the special capability of Brandley Engineering to complete engineering design projects on expedited timelines.

Once the beacon project design was complete, our attention returned to the completion of the runway reconstruction and widening design. FAA determined that funding would be available for the runway reconstruction and widening project in the 2022 fiscal year. Our office completed plans and specifications ready for bid in February 2022. Bids were opened on March 9, 2022. Brandley Engineering completed construction management, resident engineering and inspection on the construction phase of this project in April 2024.
105
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 2-1

STAFF AND SUBCONSULTANT

QUALIFICATIONS
SECTION 2
2-1 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
Brandley Engineering has one of the most unique and highly qualified design teams. As a family business, our team consists of the second generation of Brandley Engineering, Melissa Brandley and Damon Brandley. Both Melissa and Damon Brandley planned on continuing the Brandley Engineering legacy from an early age and began working for the company as teenagers.

As a result, our design team’s background, education, and abilities have been carefully planned to perfectly complement each other to create the best possible team. Our approach to building a highly qualified design team centers on advanced education and knowledge, as these are the key ingredients to solving very difficult and complicated engineering challenges. All project managers have advanced master’s degrees in civil engineering and extensive airport engineering and construction management experience.

Damon Brandley’s master’s degree in pavements and materials perfectly complements Melissa Brandley’s master’s degree in geotechnical engineering. This, combined with their many years under the guidance of Reinard W. Brandley with his extensive knowledge and over 70 years of experience in the airport engineering field, creates the ideal team to solve any engineering design challenge. Melissa and Damon Brandley are supported by a veteran team of five engineers, drafters, and support staff with extensive experience in airport design, construction management, planning and environmental. Every employee of Brandley Engineering has spent their entire aviation career with our firm.

The project staffing for the office of Brandley Engineering has been structured to utilize experienced project managers, engineers, planners, technicians, and administrative personnel. Project staffing workload in our office is largely controlled by limiting the number and type of projects to which we submit proposals and by minor adjustments to staffing. We have reserved space in our workload to provide the time and attention required for the projects anticipated at Oroville Municipal Airport over the next five years.

All members of the Brandley Engineering staff can begin work immediately following contract execution as needed on Oroville Municipal Airport projects. Brandley Engineering schedules the work as soon as we receive authorization to proceed on a project and holds weekly meetings to ensure all projects are being completed on time and within budget.

All members of the Brandley Engineering team have extensive knowledge of FAA regulations, policies, and procedures, including:
• Airport Capital Improvement Plans
(ACIP)
• Airport Improvement Program (AIP)
FAA grant funding
• Pavement Maintenance Management
Plans (PMMP)
• Environmental processes for design
and construction projects
• 7460-1 preparation and submittal on
OE/AAA website
• Review process of plans and
specifications
• Bidding process
• Award process including all required
submittals to FAA
• FAA Quality Control and Quality
Assurance requirements
• Inspection requirements for all
materials
• Standard Operating Procedures
(SOP) for Construction Project
Change Orders
• Construction management
requirements
• Project/grant closeout.

Knowledge required to develop and incorporate the design details into a set of plans and specifications is obtained by advanced graduate schooling, experience, and research. All members of the Brandley Management Team have completed advanced graduate schooling with master’s degrees. This will ensure all projects at Oroville Municipal Airport will be properly designed and result in long-life, low-maintenance projects.

The engineering design and construction management work performed for the City of Oroville on Oroville Municipal Airport projects will be managed by Melissa Brandley, P.E. Melissa will also be responsible for all Geotechnical evaluation and design. 106
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 2-2 The Pavement Maintenance Management Plan work and pavement section design performed for Oroville Municipal Airport will be managed by Damon Brandley, P.E. An Organization Chart for engineering design and construction management is presented below. The experience of each key staff member in the Brandley Engineering Team is presented at the end of this section including narrative descriptions, resumes, and licenses.

Our extensive experience in airport design throughout the United States places us in a unique position to provide inhouse a complete engineering service for design and construction supervision. The only subconsultants we will utilize for engineering and construction management services are for environmental services for preparation of Categorical Exclusions, electrical engineering for electrical infrastructure, topographic surveys, certified ASTM testing for construction management projects and DBE plan and goal preparation.

Resumes of key staff and key subconsultants including environmental, electrical engineering and certified ASTM testing for construction are included below. Resumes of minor subconsultants for topographic surveys, and DBE plan and goal preparation are available upon request.

The organizational chart presented below shows the management structure that is proposed to implement Oroville Municipal Airport architecture/engineering and construction management projects.

ASTM AC
& PCC TESTING
G3 QUALITY
Joshua Noegal
MELISSA BRANDLEY, P.E.

Project Manager
Principal Engineer
Geotechnical Analysis
DAMON BRANDLEY, P.E.

Principal Engineer
Pavement
Evaluation/Design

PRELIMINARY
DESIGN

BRANDLEY ENGINEERING
Melissa Brandley, P.E.

Damon Brandley, P.E.

PROJECT PHASING/

SCHEDULING

BRANDLEY ENGINEERING
Melissa Brandley, P.E.

ENGINEERING DESIGN

BRANDLEY ENGINEERING
Melissa Brandley, P.E.

Tom Steinkamp, E.I.T.

ENGINEERING DESIGN

SUPPORT

BRANDLEY ENGINEERING
Kevin Curry, P.E.

David Baltazar, E.I.T.

Alaire Wells

CONSTRUCTION

RECORDS/ACCOUNTING

BRANDLEY ENGINEERING
Melissa Brandley, P.E.

David Baltazar, E.I.T.

Alaire Wells

ELECTRICAL

ENGINEERING

DINTER ENGINEERING
Tim Prockish, P.E.

PROJECT CLOSE OUT

BRANDLEY ENGINEERING
Melissa Brandley, P.E.

David Baltazar, E.I.T.

Alaire Wells

DESIGN PHASE CONSTRUCTION PHASE

INSPECTION
& TESTING

BRANDLEY ENGINEERING
Melissa Brandley, P.E.

David Baltazar, E.I.T.

Tom Steinkamp, E.I.T.

SUBMITTAL REVIEW

BRANDLEY ENGINEERING
Melissa Brandley, P.E.

Damon Brandley, P.E.

ENVIRONMENTAL

STUDIES

WALLACE ENVIRONMENTAL
Jim Wallace

ACORN ENVIRONMENTAL
Bibiana Sparks

TOPOGRAPHIC

STUDIES

CTA ENGINEERING
& SURVEYING
Damon Burns, PLS
107
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 2-3 Melissa Brandley has been on staff since 2004 and will be Project Engineer and Project Manager and point of contact for all airport engineering and construction management projects for Oroville Municipal Airport projects. She has provided all project management services for projects related to the Oroville Municipal Airport since 2012. Ms. Brandley is a major partner in Brandley Engineering and part of the second generation of Brandley Engineering. She is a registered Civil Engineer in the State of California (C 71139). Ms. Brandley received bachelor’s & master’s degrees in Civil Engineering from Texas A&M University with an emphasis in Geotechnical Engineering.

Melissa Brandley worked for Brandley Engineering for six summers during high school and college learning the basics of airport design and complying with FAA design standards and advisory circulars. She has been a full-time staff member and major partner in Brandley Engineering for 20 years since completing her university studies in 2004. She has conducted construction management, testing, and inspection on airports over the past 20 years.

Melissa Brandley’s vast airport planning and design experience covers every facet of airport engineering including design of runways, taxiways, aprons, hangar developments, helicopter parking areas, roads, parking lots, drainage systems, lighting systems, navigational aids and fencing. Her graduate school studies in Geotechnical Engineering ensures that each design incorporates a detailed geotechnical evaluation of local soil conditions. This experience coupled with extensive knowledge of FAA standards and advisory circulars results in a design that meets all FAA standards and addresses unique local conditions and needs of the airport.

Melissa is the lead engineer in all Geotechnical Engineering evaluations and reports. Melissa’s master’s degree in Geotechnical Engineering ensures that each design project includes a detailed Geotechnical testing plan, the local soil conditions are properly evaluated, and the ultimate design adequately addresses any potential subgrade strength challenges. For each engineering design project, Melissa’s detailed Geotechnical Engineering Report includes evaluation of the site geology and subsurface conditions, soil corrosion potential, frost susceptibility and risk, seismic evaluation including surface fault rupture, liquefaction and dynamic seismic settlement risk, and recommendations for site work preparation, and pavement subgrade design strength. Melissa’s Geotechnical Engineering background is also invaluable to evaluating and resolving complicated geotechnical construction challenges such as soft and unstable subgrade.

Melissa is also the lead engineer for all storm water drainage evaluation and design projects. Her experience and knowledge of water resource and storm water drainage engineering principles is invaluable to ensuring all Brandley Engineering airports are designed to properly accommodate local storm water challenges. She recently completed whole airport storm water evaluation and design projects at Madera Municipal Airport, Visalia Municipal Airport and Watsonville Municipal Airport.

Melissa Brandley’s airport design expertise is equally complimented with her knowledge and experience in construction management. She has been the Resident Engineer overseeing each phase of construction on most of her design projects. This unique combination of design and construction management expertise ensures that each project is designed with an emphasis on anticipating and addressing unique construction challenges in order to avoid costly change orders and delays during construction.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Representative projects on which Melissa has been Project Manager/Project Engineer/Resident Engineer for Brandley Engineering are as follows:
 Oroville Municipal Airport – Crack Seal Taxiway L, North Tie Down Apron, South Tie Down Apron, and Tee Hangar Taxilanes - 2024
 Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Reconstruct General Aviation and Temporary Terminal Parking Lot – 2024

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
20 with Brandley

EDUCATION
BS Civil Engineering
Texas A & M, 2003
ME Civil Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering
Texas A & M, 2004

LICENSE
California Professional
Engineer - C 71139

CONTACT
C. (916) 316.1415
O. (916) 652.4725
[email protected]
Melissa S.

Brandley, P.E.

Project Manager/
Project Engineer/
Geotechnical Studies
2-2 RESUMES
108
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 2-4 Melissa Brandley - Project Manager/Project Engineer/Geotechnical Studies - CONTINUED  Georgetown Airport – Replace Airport Beacon and Beacon Tower - 2024  Tracy Municipal Airport – Crack Seal, Slurry Seal, and Minor Pavement Patching – Entrance Road and Parking Lot, Crack Seal and Slurry Seal Tee Hangar Taxilanes – 2023-2024
 Chowchilla Municipal Airport – New Beacon on Beacon Tower – 2023  Oroville Municipal Airport – Crack Seal Runway 2-20 and Associated Taxiways - 2022  Mammoth Yosemite Airport – ARFF/Snow Removal Facility – Site Work – 2022-2024  Madera Municipal Airport – Airfield Drainage Improvements – 2022  Colusa County Airport – Rehabilitate Runway Lighting and Signage – 2022-2023  Chowchilla Municipal Airport – Rehabilitation of Runway 12-30 and Airfield Electrical – 2021-22  Colusa County Airport – Crack Seal and Slurry Seal Runway 13-31 including changing Runway Identification Numbers – 2021  Visalia Municipal Airport – Seal Cracks and Remark Airfield Pavements - 2020  Visalia Municipal Airport – Upgrade Airfield Guidance Signs - 2019  Oroville Municipal Airport – Construct Taxiway K – 2018  Tracy Municipal Airport – Tee Hangar Taxilanes – 2018  Visalia Municipal Airport – Aircraft Hangar Buildings – 2018-19  Tracy Municipal Airport – New 2-box PAPI Runway 30, Power Upgrades for PAPIs Runways 12, 8, and 26, Replace AWOS – 2017  Visalia Municipal Airport – Reconstruct Apron A2 – 2017  Tracy Municipal Airport – Reconstruct General Aviation Tie Down Apron - 2017  Madera Municipal Airport – Reconstruct General Aviation Apron Phase 2 – 2016  Tracy Municipal Airport – Reconstruct Runways and Taxiways – 2015  Alturas Municipal Airport - Rehabilitate Airfield Pavement Joints & Cracks, Slurry Seal Airfield Pavements, Remark Airfield Pavements - 2014
 Stockton Metropolitan Airport – Rehabilitate R/W and T/W Lights and Signs – 2014  Watsonville Municipal Airport – Reconstruct T/W C and GA Apron Phase 1 – 2014  Oroville Municipal Airport – North Side Apron Rehabilitation – 2013  Alturas Municipal Airport - Medium Intensity Taxiway Edge Lights, Taxiway B Complex - 2012  Visalia Municipal Airport – East Side Drainage Upgrade – 2012  Rogers Field, Chester – Reconstruct Tee Hangar Taxilanes – 2012  Tulelake Municipal Airport – Rehabilitation of Aircraft Parking Apron - 2012  Madera Municipal Airport – Rehabilitation of General Aviation Apron Phase 1 - 2012 Representative projects on which Melissa has been the lead engineer for the Geotechnical Evaluation and Reports:
 Madera Municipal Airport – Rehabilitate Apron A2 – 2024 - 2025  Roger’s Field – Expand Existing Fuel Storage Tanks – 2024 - 2025  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Apron A2 – 2024 - 2025  Nevada County Airport -Reconstruct Ramp 4 Taxilanes and Access Road – 2024 - 2025  University Airport, Davis – Relocate and Replace Automated Weather Observation System (AWOS III P/T)  Gansner Field – New Beacon Tower and Beacon - 2024
 Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Reconstruct General Aviation and Temporary Terminal Parking Lot – 2023  Mammoth Yosemite Airport – ARFF/Snow Removal Facility Site and Building – 2022  Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Relocate and Upgrade Automated Weather Observation System (AWOS) – 2022  Alturas Municipal Airport – Remove Existing FAA VASI and Install New FAA 4-box PAPI – 2022  Chowchilla Municipal Airport – New Beacon and Beacon Tower – 2022  Healdsburg Municipal Airport – Construct New Taxiway A2 – 2022  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Existing Runway 2-20 – 2022  University Airport, Davis – Reconstruct and Widen Runway 17-35 – 2021  University Airport, Davis – New Beacon Tower and Beacon – 2021 109
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 2-5 Damon Brandley has been on staff since 2002 and will be the Project Engineer on airport engineering and construction management projects for Oroville Municipal Airport. Mr. Brandley is a major partner in Brandley Engineering and part of the second generation of Brandley Engineering. He is a registered Civil Engineer in the State of California (C 66558). Damon is committed to provide engineering services for Oroville Municipal Airport Projects for the next five years. Damon will be responsible for all pavement section designs, pavement material submittal review, preparation of the Pavement Maintenance Management Plan and assisting Melissa with Project Management as needed.

Damon completed a Research Assistantship at the University of Illinois in Champaign/Urbana while completing his master’s degree. This research was conducted in conjunction with the FAA’s Center of Excellence in Airport Pavement Research. His work as a Research Assistant included airfield pavement design, and testing, Super Pave asphalt mix designs, and various other research projects.

Damon has been lead engineer for Pavement Evaluation Studies over the past 14 years. He has been involved in all aspects of these studies including soil testing, pavement testing, pavement inspections, calculation of the remaining life of the pavements under forecast traffic, and the development of the Pavement Management Maintenance Plans (PMMP) for more than 30 airports including Oroville Municipal Airport. Damon is responsible for all pavement section designs and pavement material submittal reviews for Brandley Engineering projects. Mr. Brandley’s master’s degree and experience in the evaluation and design of airfield pavements is invaluable to our clients in the design and construction management of pavement rehabilitation, reconstruction, and/or maintenance projects.

Damon has conducted construction management, testing, and inspection on many airports since 2002. Damon’s master’s degree in pavement materials ensures all pavement specifications and material submittals are adequate and provide the required loading support per the design specifications and any material related construction challenges are properly analyzed to determine the root cause and proper solution in order to facilitate a long life, low maintenance finished product.

Damon has the ability to delegate responsibilities for each project including drafting of plans, preparation of specifications and reports, preparation of estimates, and inspection and testing of construction projects. The staff of Brandley Engineering respect his capabilities and are ready and willing to assist him on all projects.

Damon is experienced in the design of runways, taxiways, aprons, helipads and helicopter parking areas, hangar developments, terminal developments and roads on airports.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Representative projects on which Damon was Project Manager/Engineer/Construction Manager for Brandley Engineering include the following:
 Nevada County Airport – Reconstruct Ramp 4 Taxilanes, Crack Repair Ramp 4 Taxilanes, Reconstruct Ramp 4 Access Road – 2024 - 2025
 University Airport, Davis – AWOS III P/T – 2023-2024
 Watsonville Municipal Airport – Pollution Control System – Wash Rack – 2024  Gansner Field, Quincy – New Beacon and Beacon Tower – 2023-2024  Nervino Airport and Rogers Field, Plumas County – Reseal Joints in Runway Pavements - 2022-2024
 Healdsburg Municipal Airport – Remove Taxiways, Rehabilitate Taxiway Lighting and Signage – 2023-2024
 Alturas Municipal Airport - Reseal Joints and Cracks in Airfield Pavements - R/W 13-31 and T/W B, Displace Runway 31 Threshold 200 feet and Associated Airfield Marking and Lighting and REILs, and Remove Existing FAA VASI and Install New FAA 4-box PAPI on Runway 31 - 2023

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
22 with Brandley

EDUCATION
BS Civil Engineering
Texas A & M, 2000
MS Civil Engineering
Transportation Engineering
University of Illinois, 2001

LICENSE
California Professional
Engineer - C 66558

CONTINUING EDUCATION
AAAE GIS Conference
and Exhibition
Damon
Brandley, P.E.

Principal Engineer/
Project Engineer

CONTACT
C. (916) 316.0544
O. (916) 652.4725
[email protected]
110
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 2-6  Mammoth Yosemite Airport - Relocate and Upgrade Automated Weather Observation System (AWOS III/PT) – 2022-2023  University Airport, Davis – Runway 17-35 Reconstruction and Widening, Exit Pavements, and Airfield Lighting – 2022-2023  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Existing Runway 2-20 including Airfield Electrical – 2022-2023  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Taxiway A West – 2021  Mammoth Yosemite Airport - Construction of Security Gates & Terminal Area Fence - 2021-2022  Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Reconstruct East General Aviation Apron – 2020  Nervino Airport, Beckwourth – Fuel Farm Expansion – 2020  Lincoln Regional Airport – New Fuel Farm – 2019
 Truckee Tahoe Airport – Executive Hangar Development - 2018  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Taxilane R – 2018  Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Upgrade Segmented Circle and Wind Cone – 2018-2019  Sacramento Executive Airport – Removal of Runway 16-34 - 2017  Truckee Tahoe Airport District – Tahoe City Helipad - 2017  Alturas Municipal Airport – Construct Helicopter Parking Apron – 2016  Sacramento International Airport – Reconstruction of Taxiway D – 2016  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Taxiway A - 2015
 Chico Municipal Airport – Reconstruct Aircraft Parking Apron - 2015  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Apron A4 - 2015
 Truckee Tahoe Airport – 2014 Airfield Maintenance Projects  Lake Tahoe Airport – Reconstruction of General Aviation Apron – 2013-14  Truckee Tahoe Airport – 2013 Airfield Maintenance Projects  Tahoe City - Helipad Feasibility - 2012
 Chico Municipal Airport – Reconstruct Taxiway H - 2011  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Runway 10-28 Rehabilitation and 2011 & 2012 Pavement Maintenance Projects – 2011-12  Oroville Municipal Airport – Crack Seal Pavements, Airfield Guidance Signs – 2011  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Runway 10-28 (11-29) - 2011 Over the past several years Damon Brandley has prepared PMMPs for the following airports:
 Plumas County Airports – Nervino Airport, Gansner Field, Rogers Field – 2024  Colusa County Airport – 2024
 Oroville Municipal Airport - 2023
 Watsonville Municipal Airport - 2021
 Nevada County Airport - 2021
 Truckee Tahoe Airport - 2021
 Chowchilla Municipal Airport (PCI) – 2018
 Alturas Municipal Airport – 2017
 Lake Tahoe Airport – 2017
 Chico Municipal Airport – 2017
 Fresno Chandler Executive Airport – PCI Update - 2016  Stockton Metropolitan Airport – 2016
 Sacramento County Airports – Sacramento International, Sacramento Mather, and Sacramento Executive – 2015-16  Madera Municipal Airport – 2014
 Mammoth Yosemite Airport – 2014
 Tracy Municipal Airport – 2013
 Truckee Tahoe Airport, Truckee, California – 2011
Damon Brandley - Principal Engineer/Project Engineer - CONTINUED 111
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 2-7 Tom Steinkamp has been on staff since 1984 and will serve as Airport Engineer and Resident Engineer for the Oroville Municipal Airport.

Mr. Steinkamp brings a dynamic engineering background to this firm with over 50 years of experience in engineering design. This experience began with a mechanical engineering degree and continued with 10 years of active employment with a civil engineering, consulting/materials testing firm as a project designer and materials testing technician.

Since he began working for Brandley Engineering in 1984, Mr. Steinkamp has developed a thorough knowledge of the principles and practices of civil and airport engineering and airport planning with knowledge of and experience with FAA regulations, requirements, practices, design criteria and advisory circulars.

Tom has been providing engineering and planning services for the Oroville Municipal Airport since 1984 including the preparation of the updated Airport Layout Plan Drawings.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Representative projects on which Tom was Project Engineer for Brandley Engineering are as follows:
 Oroville Municipal Airport – Crack Seal Taxiway L, North Tie Down Apron, South Tie Down Apron, and Tee Hangar Taxilanes - 2024
 Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Taxiway Connector and Access Road – 2024  Watsonville Municipal Airport – Wash Rack – 2024
 Georgetown Airport – New Beacon and Beacon Tower - 2024  Nevada County Airport – Reconstruct Ramp 4 Taxilanes, Crack Repair Ramp 4 Taxilanes, Reconstruct Ramp 4 Access Road - 2024
 Alturas Municipal Airport - Reseal Joints and Cracks in Airfield Pavements - R/W 13-31 and T/W B, Displace Runway 31 Threshold and REILs, and Remove Existing FAA VASI and Install New FAA PAPI - 2023
 Chowchilla Municipal Airport – New Beacon on Beacon Tower – 2023  Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Reconstruct General Aviation and Temporary Terminal Parking Lot – 2024
 Oroville Municipal Airport – Crack Seal Runway 2-20 and Associated Taxiways - 2022  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Existing Runway 2-20 including Airfield Electrical – 2022
 Chowchilla Municipal Airport – Rehabilitation of Runway 12-30 and Airfield Electrical – 2021-22
 Nevada County Airport – Crack Seal Taxiway A, Crack Seal and Slurry Seal Ramp 2, Crack Seal Ramps 1 and 5 – 2021
 Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Reconstruct Town Hangar Taxilane, Slurry Seal Taxiways, Upgrade Airfield Guidance Signs – 2020
 Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Relocate Wind Cone and Segmented Circle – 2019  Oroville Municipal Airport – Construct Taxiway K – 2018-19  Watsonville Municipal Airport – Airfield Guidance Sign Upgrade – 2018  Lincoln Regional Airport – Upgrade Perimeter Fence Security Gates - 2017  Watsonville Municipal Airport – 2-box PAPIs Runways 2 and 20 – 2017  Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Wildlife/Security Fence – 2017 Tom has served as Resident Project Representative for Brandley Engineering on many construction projects over the past 40 years. Representative projects are listed below:
 Alturas Municipal Airport – Reseal Joints Runway 13-31 and Taxiway B – 2024  Rogers Field – Reseal Joints in Runway 16-34 Pavements - 2024

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
50 Total
40 with Brandley

EDUCATION
BS Mechanical Engineering
Oregon State University, 1979
Thomas A.

Steinkamp, E.I.T.

Airport Engineer/
Resident Engineer
112
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 2-8 Thomas A. Steinkamp, E.I.T. - Airport Engineer/Resident Engineer - CONTINUED  Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Relocate and Upgrade Automated Weather Observation System (AWOS III/PT) – 2023-2024  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Runway 2-20 and Airfield Lighting - 2023  Chowchilla Municipal Airport – New Beacon and Beacon Tower - 2023  Nevada County Airport – Crack Seal Taxiway A, Crack Seal and Slurry Seal Ramp 2, Crack Seal Ramps 1 and 5 – 2022  Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Reconstruct Town Hangar Taxilane, Slurry Seal Taxiways, Upgrade Airfield Guidance Signs – 2021
 Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Security Gates and Terminal Area Fencing - 2021  Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Reconstruct East General Aviation Apron - 2020  Watsonville Municipal Airport – Crack Seal and Slurry Seal Runway 2-20 & Cross T/Ws - 2019  Gansner Field, Quincy – Reconstruct R/W 7-25 and Cross T/Ws – 2017  Chico Municipal Airport – Reconstruct Apron Phase 3 – 2016  Chico Municipal Airport – Reconstruct T/W H and Apron Phase 5 – 2015  Watsonville Municipal Airport – Reconstruct T/W C and G.A. Apron 1 - 2014  Madera Municipal Airport – Reconstruct G.A. Apron Phase 1 – 2013  Bryant Field – Reconstruct R/W and T/W, Construct New Cross R/W - 2012  Madera Municipal Airport – G.A. Apron Expansion Phase 2B – 2010 113
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 2-9

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
19 with Brandley

EDUCATION
BS Mechanical Engineering
CSU Sacramento, 2007
David Baltazar has been involved in airport design and airfield pavement testing and inspection on airports in the Western United States since 2005. He has 19 years of progressive field and laboratory experience in testing and inspection of airfield projects in our office. He is experienced in the design and inspection of runways, taxiways, aprons, and roads, including paving, grading, drainage, lighting, utilities, etc.

Mr. Baltazar has developed and applied his skills for designing and inspecting airport construction projects. From the design phase to the finished construction, he treats each project with respect and professionalism in the Airport’s interests, which results in a quality project that will outperform and outlast expectations.

Mr. Baltazar has been the lead designer on airfield pavement crack and joint seal projects and pavement reconstruction projects on airports. Having spent a formidable period of his engineering profession performing laboratory testing, Mr. Baltazar has gained a familiarity of material testing that is the foundation of his Resident Engineer/Inspection expertise.

Mr. Baltazar will serve on the design staff and construction management team for the Oroville Municipal Airport projects for the next five years. He will devote the time required to complete the projects within the time agreed.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Representative projects on which David served on the design team for Brandley Engineering are as follows:
 Georgetown Airport – New Beacon and Beacon Tower – 2024  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Apron A2 - 2024
 Alturas Municipal Airport - Reseal Joints and Cracks - R/W 13-31 and T/W B, Displace R/W 31 Threshold with Marking, Lighting and REILs, Install New FAA 4-box PAPI on R/W 31 - 2023  Mammoth Yosemite Airport – ARFF/Snow Removal Facility – Site Work – 2022-24  Oroville Municipal Airport – Crack Seal Runway 2-20 and Associated Taxiways - 2022  University Airport, Davis – Runway 17-35 Reconstruction and Widening, Exit Pavements, and Airfield Lighting – 2022
 Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Taxiway A West – 2021  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Runway 11-29 East Blast Pad, Construct Medical Services Apron, Construct New Wash Rack – 2020
 Watsonville Municipal Airport – Seal Cracks, Seal Coat, and Remark Runway 2-20 and Associated Taxiways - 2019
 Visalia Municipal Airport – Hangar Development – Building and Site – 2017-18  Chowchilla Municipal Airport – Crack Seal, Slurry Seal, and Remark Taxiway A and Aircraft Parking Apron – 2018
 Lake Tahoe Airport – General Aviation Reconstruction Phase 4 – 2017 David has served on the construction management team for Brandley Engineering on many projects since 2005. Representative projects are listed below:
 Nervino Airport – Reseal Joints in Runway Pavements – 2024  University Airport, Davis – Runway 17-35 Reconstruction and Widening, Exit Pavements, and Airfield Lighting – 2023
 Chowchilla Municipal Airport – New Beacon on Beacon Tower – 2023  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Taxiway A West – 2021  Colusa County Airport – Crack Seal and Slurry Seal Runway 13-31 – 2021  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Runway 11-29 East Blast Pad, Construct Medical Services Apron, Construct New Wash Rack – 2020
 Lincoln Regional Airport – New Fuel Farm – 2019
 Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Taxilane R – 2019  Chowchilla Municipal Airport – Crack Seal, Slurry Seal Taxiway A and Apron – 2018  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Hangar Taxilanes CD and DE (East) – 2017  Alturas Municipal Airport – Construct Helicopter Parking Apron – 2016  Rogers Field – Reconstruct Tie Down Apron – 2015
 Watsonville Municipal Airport – Taxiway C & GA Apron Reconstruction – 2014 David
Baltazar, E.I.T.

Design Engineer/
Resident Engineer
114
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 2-10

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
19 Total, 9 with Brandley

EDUCATION
Undergraduate Coursework
Civil and Environmental
Engineering
Brigham Young University, 2012

LICENSE
California Professional
Engineer – C 90627
Kevin Currey, P.E.

Airport Engineer/
Construction Support
Mr. Currey has over 18 years’ experience in design and engineering of civil infrastructure projects. In addition to airport-related projects, his professional experience includes large-scale residential, commercial, and mixed use land development; design of compensatory wetlands and environmental mitigation projects; drainage master plans; and public works planning, scoping, and engineering design. He is also experienced in land planning, surveying, and project scheduling.

Mr. Currey is very knowledgeable in airport design and construction management support. He has been the project designer for the Truckee Tahoe Airport Reconstruct Runway and Airfield Electrical, Sacramento International Airport East Taxiways Improvements, Gansner Field Runway 7-25 Reconstruction, Truckee Tahoe Airport Taxiway A Reconstruction, and Chico Municipal Airport Taxiway A Reconstruction.

He is well-versed in FAA advisory circulars, requirements, and guidelines and is a valuable asset to the resident engineering and inspection team, providing construction support in the form of quantity take-offs, research, and other forms of office support.

Mr. Currey will serve on the design staff, and construction support staff for the Oroville Municipal Airport projects.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Representative projects on which Kevin served on the design team for Brandley Engineering are as follows:
 Tracy Municipal Airport – Upgrade Airfield Guidance Signs - 2024  Oroville Municipal Airport – Crack Seal Taxiway L, North Tie Down Apron, South Tie Down Apron, and Tee Hangar Taxilanes - 2024
 Watsonville Municipal Airport – Pollution Control System – Wash Rack – 2024  Madera Municipal Airport – Reconstruct Apron A2 and Taxilanes - 2024  Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Reconstruct General Aviation and Temporary Terminal Parking Lot – 2024
 Mammoth Yosemite Airport – ARFF/Snow Removal Facility – Site Work – 2022-24  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Existing Runway 2-20 including Airfield Electrical - 2022
 Madera Municipal Airport – Airfield Drainage Improvements - 2022  Chowchilla Municipal Airport – Reconstruct Runway 12-30 – 2021-22  University Airport, Davis – Runway 17-35 Reconstruction and Widening, Exit Pavements, and Airfield Lighting – 2021-22
 Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Security Gates and Terminal Area Fence – 2020  Lincoln Regional Airport – New Fuel Farm – 2019
 Visalia Municipal Airport – Aircraft Hangar Buildings - 2019  Chico Municipal Airport – Reconstruct Taxiway A – 2017-2018  Bryant Field Airport – Obstruction Evaluation – 2016
 Sacramento International Airport – East Taxiways Improvements – 2015-16  Gansner Field Airport – Runway 7-25 Reconstruction – 2015-16  Madera Municipal Airport – Apron Reconstruction – 2016  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Jet Apron Reconstruction – 2015-16  Alturas Municipal Airport – Helicopter Apron – 2016
 Truckee Tahoe Airport District – Tahoe City Helipad – 2015  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Taxiway A Reconstruction – 2015  McClellan Airfield – Airfield Remarking Plan – 2015
 Tracy Municipal Airport – Runway 12-30 & Taxiway B Reconstruction - 2015  Oroville Municipal Airport – Drainage and Safety Area Improvements – 2015 115
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 2-11 Alaire Wells has been a member of the Brandley Engineering team since 1979. She is involved in the project administration and grants administration for all clients.

Alaire has been working for Brandley Engineering since 1979. In that time, she has become very knowledgeable in all steps required to complete a project beginning with ACIP, grant applications (FAA and State), preparation of specifications and reports, bidding process, award process, construction process including preparation of weekly reports, progress payments, FAA drawdown requests, and maintaining all records of construction, and the final closeout process including final report, final drawdown requests, and requests to FAA for closeout of the grant.

She has a thorough knowledge of and experience with FAA regulations, requirements, practices, and advisory circulars.

EXPERIENCE
Ms. Wells has been actively involved in airport projects and grant administration for Brandley Engineering since 1979. She has over 45 years of working with airports and the FAA to ensure that all projects meet FAA deadlines and are in compliance with FAA requirements and that information required by the FAA is assembled and delivered as required. All clients’ requests are answered in a timely and accurate manner.

Examples of services Alaire performs for our clients include:
• Assisting Airport and Engineer in preparation of annual Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP).
• Assisting Airport and Engineer in preparation of grant applications. • Keeping track of deadlines and budgets.
• Preparation of Construction Safety and Phasing Plan (CSPP) narrative. • Assembly of specifications and reports for Project/Design Engineer’s review. • Preparation and submittal of Invitation for Bids to Airport for their use in advertising projects. • When bids have been received, preparation of abstract of bids and application documents required for the FAA grant based on bids.
• During construction, maintenance of all records of construction. • Assisting Airport in preparation of reimbursement requests for amounts reimbursable from grant projects (FAA Form 271).
• Assembly of final engineer’s report for Project Engineer’s review. • Obtain release of liens and other required final close-out documents from contractors. • Assisting Airport in preparation of final drawdown request, the Federal Financial Report (FAA Form 425), and other documents the airport requires for closing out the FAA grant.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
47 Total
45 with Brandley

EDUCATION
AA, American River
College, 1979
Alaire Wells
Projects/Grants
Administrator
116
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 2-12 Susan Vitt has been a member of the Brandley Engineering team since 2015. She is involved in the administrative support for all projects, including payroll verification for prevailing wage rates, assisting with the drafting of pay estimates and change orders, and preparing quarterly reports for grants.

Susan has been working for Brandley Engineering since 2015. In that time, she has been assisting Alaire in completing projects, including grant applications, preparation of specifications and safety plans, the bidding and award process through the construction process including preparation of weekly reports, assistance with preparation of progress payments, change orders, and submittal responses through the final closeout of the project.

Susan has completed the Public Works Compliance Advisors DIR/Certified Payroll Compliance and Federal Davis-Bacon Compliance course and is fully qualified to verify contractor certified payroll compliance.

EXPERIENCE
Ms. Vitt has been actively involved in administrative support for Brandley Engineering since 2015. She has over 10 years of experience working with airports.

Examples of services Susan performs for our clients include:
• Assisting Airport and Engineer in preparation of annual Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP).
• Over six years of DIR prevailing wage experience.
• Checking Certified Payrolls from Contractors for Construction Jobs. • Preparation of CIP’s and Uploading to the State of California website • Keeping track of deadlines and personnel time.
• Preparation of Construction Safety and Phasing Plan (CSPP) narrative. • Assembly of specifications and reports for Project/Design Engineer’s review. • When bids have been received, preparation of abstract of bids and application documents required for the FAA grant based on bids.
• Assisting Project Manager and/or Resident Engineer in the preparation of weekly reports, progress payments, required change orders, and contractor submittal responses. • Assisting in obtaining final closeout documents from the contractor, including lien releases, DBE reports, warranties, and certified payrolls.
• Assisting in project closeout, including preparation of Final Engineer’s Report.

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
28 Total
9 with Brandley

EDUCATION
Public Works Compliance
Advisors DIR/Certified
Payroll Compliance
Susan Vitt
Administrative
Assistant
117
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 2-13 Jim Wallace has been providing environmental consulting services to airports for over 28 years and will serve a Co-Project Manager and lead author with Acorn Environmental for all environmental compliance documents.

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Mr. Wallace has over 47 years of environmental and natural resources consulting experience including 27 years preparing over 270 NEPA and CEQA compliance documents for over 30 airports in central and northern California. Nearly all of the airport projects include coordination with multi-disciplinary teams for compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Sections 401 and 404 of the US Clean Water Act, US Clean Air Act and US Endangered Species Act and many projects required compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Mr. Wallace has developed an excellent working relationship with FAA district and regional offices and with airport sponsors.

AIRPORT RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Mammoth Yosemite Airport; Town of Mammoth Lakes
• Prepared NEPA and CEQA documents for a new passenger terminal and terminal development area.
• Prepared a U.S. Dot Section 4(f) report for an access road extension on land managed by the US Forest Service.
• Prepared report requesting that the US Fish and Wildlife Service withdraw the airport from the Bi-State Distinct Population Segment of Greater Sage-Grouse proposed critical habitat. • Prepared multiple biological resource documents for taxiway and aircraft apron reconstruction; new security fence, obstruction lighting; backup electrical power systems and wind-sock relocation.
• Prepared Wildlife Hazard Management Plan, Biological Assessment which included an assessment of biological resources within a 5-mile radius of the airport.

Lincoln Regional Airport; City of Lincoln (CA)
• Prepared an Environmental Assessment and Negative Mitigated Declaration (CEQA) for the reconstruction of Runway 15/33; project includes impacts to wetlands and compliance with the Placer County Conservation Program
• Prepared NEPA and CEQA biological resource documents for Airport Master Plan; projects included new access road, commercial non-aviation development area, box hangar complex and taxiway extension. Managed the preparation of a wetland delineation which identified over 30-acres of wetlands and fairy shrimp habitat which complicated airport development.
• Prepared NEPA compliance document for runway safety area maintenance which required mitigating impacts to wetland features.

Tulelake Municipal Airport, Modoc County
• Prepared Wildlife Hazard Assessment which resulted in an Environmental Assessment (NEPA) and Environmental Impact Report (CEQA) for construction of 16,000 linear feet of perimeter fence.
• Prepared extensive cultural resources reports and drafted documents for submission to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
• Prepared complex DOT Section4(f) report to address the project effect on significant cultural resource properties.

Selected California airports for which Mr. Wallace prepared NEPA compliance documents:

EXPERIENCE
Total Years of Experience
48 Years
Total Years of Airport
Experience 28 Years

EDUCATION
B.A. History,
Humboldt State University,
Arcata, California
Graduate Work in Natural
Resource Management,
Humboldt State University,
Arcata, California
Jim Wallace
Principal, Senior
Environmental
Consultant

CONTACT
C. 916-775-2380
[email protected]
• Nevada County Airport
• Madera Municipal Airport
• Chowchilla Municipal Airport
• Visalia Municipal Airport
• Tulelake Municipal Airport
• Lincoln Regional Airport
• Cedarville Municipal Airport
• Truckee-Tahoe Airport
• ICON Aircraft at Lake
Berryessa
• Hayfork Municipal Airport
• Alturas Municipal Airport
• Oroville Municipal Airport
• Placerville Airport
• Georgetown Airport
• Healdsburg Municipal Airport
• Napa County Airport
• Stockton Metropolitan Airport
• Tracy Municipal Airport
• Colusa County Airport
• Mammoth Yosemite Airport
• Watsonville Municipal Airport
• Chico Municipal Airport
118
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 2-14

BIBIANA SPARKS
PRINCIPAL | PROJECT DIRECTOR
Bibiana Sparks is a Project Director with 16 years of experience in preparing and managing NEPA and CEQA compliance reports and related documents.

She has accomplished environmental compliance work for local, State, and federal agencies, as well as an array of private enterprises. Through her experience with heavily complex and controversial projects she is adept at coordinating with lead agencies, stakeholders, sub-consultants, and project teams to produce thorough, technically accurate, legally defensible, and consistent compliance document that is tailored to fulfill the needs of each project. Over the course of her career, Ms. Sparks has:
 Managed and was primary author on NEPA compliance documents for the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), for projects in California, Washington, Oregon, Wisconsin, Michigan, Oklahoma, and Illinois.  Managed the preparation of CEQA compliance documentation for several complex and controversial housing and commercial development projects including, most recently, the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the Point Molate Mixed-Use Development Project for the City of Richmond in the San Francisco Bay Area.
 Managed and was primary author on several CEQA compliance documents for water and wastewater infrastructure projects, some of which included discussion of federal crosscutting regulations (also referred to as CEQA-plus documents) to support federal
environmental compliance associated with grant applications for the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Programs and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Clean Water State Revolving Fund (SRF).

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
 Redding Rancheria Strawberry Fields Fee-to-Trust and Casino Relocation Project EIS, Shasta County, CA
 Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Rehabilitation Projects CEQAPlus Initial Studies and Addendums, Clearlake Oaks County Water District, Clearlake Oaks, CA
 Friant-Kern-Canal Bridge/Millerton Road Widening IS/MND, EA, and permitting, Fresno County, CA
 Millerton Road Widening IS/EA, and permitting, Fresno County, CA  Winchell Cove Pipeline IS/EA and permitting, Fresno County, CA  Point Molate Mixed-Use Subsequent EIR, City of Richmond, CA  Amoruso Specific Plan EIR, City of Roseville, CA
 Tule River Tribe FTT and Eagle Mountain Casino Relocation Project 2- Part Determination EIS, Porterville, CA
 Domestic Wastewater System Improvements and Recycled Water Facility EIR, City of Hollister, San Benito County, CA

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
Over 16 Years

EDUCATION
University of California, Davis
Bachelor of Science
Major in Environmental Resource
Science; Minor in Environmental
Policy Analysis

KEY QUALIFICATIONS
 Adept at all aspects of
preparing compliance
documents include drafting
and analysis of project
alternatives, growthinducing impact analyses,
responding to public and
agency comments,
budgeting, scheduling, and
quality control
 Effective at coordinating
public agencies to ensure
project completion
119
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 2-15 1 | P rockish
TIM A. PROCKISH, P.E.

C.E.O.

Chief Electrical Engineer

PROFILE
Mr. Prockish has 35 years of engineering
experience from various local electrical
engineering and contracting firms.

Tim has designed all types of electrical
systems including communications
infrastructure items such as security,
telephone, local area network (LAN),
fiber optics, information display, and fire
alarm systems, power distribution,
building electrical systems, roadway and
interior lighting and airfield power,
lighting and NAVAID systems.

Mr. Prockish has considerable military
experience with various DOD agencies
including the Air Force, Army, Marine
Corps, and Navy. As Project Manager for
many recent projects for the Naval Air
Station in Fallon, Nevada, he has been
involved in two IDIQ contracts at this
Base. He has also been involved in
several projects for federal agencies
including work for the General Services
Administration, USDA Forest Service,
U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD), U.S. Dept. of Labor,
and Department of Veterans Affairs.

CONTACT
DIRECT: 775.826.4044
CELL: 208.457.2538
WEBSITE: http://www.dinter.com
EMAIL: [email protected]
35 YEARS EXPERIENCE
22 years with Dinter Engineering

PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
Electrical Engineering P.E. Licensed in AZ, CA, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WY (license numbers provided upon request)

EDUCATION
B.S. Electrical Engineering
University of Nevada, Reno 1993
SKILLS
Tim will serve as the Chief Electrical Engineer, supervising all phases of electrical engineering including design, calculations, project scheduling, estimating, submittal review, field inspections, overseeing staff and drafters, and system installation for all types of electrical systems including communications infrastructure such as security, telephone, local area network (LAN), fiber optics, information display, and fire alarm systems, power distribution, building electrical, and roadway and interior lighting systems.

RECENT RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Evanston-Uinta County Airport – Burns Field, Evanston, WY:

Reconstruct Runway 5-23 and upgrade airfield lighting project • Ralph Wenz Field, Pinedale, WY: PNA E GA Apron Expansion Project • Long Beach Airport, Long Beach, CA: Taxiway L Improvements • Long Beach Airport, Long Beach, CA: Taxiway B-E Improvements • Hulett Municipal Airport, Hulett, WY: Rehabilitate Runway 13-31 upgrade airfield lighting project
• Long Beach Airport, Long Beach, CA: Improvement to Taxiway C • Baker City Municipal Airport, Baker City, Oregon: Taxiway Alpha Rehabilitation
• Barstow-Daggett Airport, Daggett, California: Taxiway B Extension and Electrical Upgrades
• Beatty Airport, Beatty, Nevada (3):
o Apron Lighting
o Emergency Generator
o Apron Lighting
120
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 2-16 2 | P rockish

RECENT RELEVANT WORK
• Bert Mooney Airport, Butte, Montana: Airport Improvements • Big Piney-Marbleton Airport (Miley Memorial Field), Big Piney, Wyoming: Reconstruct Runway 13-31/Apron End Connecting Taxiway
• Brackett Field Airport, La Verne, California: Taxiway Lighting and Guidance Sign Relocation • Brunswick Executive Airport, Brunswick, Maine: Install New MALSR with Equipment Shelter • Bryant Field Airport, Bridgeport, California: Improvements • Carson City Airport, Carson City, Nevada: Rehabilitate and Realign Runway 9/27 and Taxiway A - Construction Management Services
• Casa Grande Municipal Airport, Casa Grande, Arizona: PAPI Relocation, Security Access Gate, and Taxiway Lighting for New Apron
• Chino Airport, Chino, California (2):
o Parallel Taxiway “E”
o Relocate Thresholds for Runway 3/21 and Modify Airport Signage • Cloverdale Municipal Airport, Cloverdale, California: Runways 14 and 32 Rehabilitation and Connector Taxiway Design
• Dixon Airport, Dixon, Wyoming (2):
o New Airport Beacon
o NAVAIDS
• Falcon Field Airport, Mesa, Arizona (2):
o East Ramp Reconfiguration - Tiedown-Edge Lighting
o Echo Ramp Expansion
• Fallon Municipal Airport, Fallon, Nevada (2):
o Runway 3-21 Reconstruction
o Installation of PAPIs
• Flying Eagle Air Park Ranches, Washoe County, Nevada: Review Airfield Electrical Submittals • Gabbs Airport, Gabbs, Nevada: Grade Runway Safety Areas • Garfield County Regional Airport, Rifle, Colorado: New ODALS • Grand Coulee Dam Airport, Electric City, Washington: 2010 Airport Improvements • Grant County Regional Airport, John Day, Oregon (2):
o 2009 Lighting and Improvements Project
o Runway 9-27 Extension
• Henderson Executive Airport, Henderson, Nevada (3):
o Itinerant Aircraft Apron Expansion (C-2338)
o North Taxilane Extension (C-2286)
o Apron Reconstruction
• Idaho Falls Regional Airport, Idaho Falls, Idaho: Runway 2/20 Rehabilitation • Kingman Airport, Kingman, Arizona: Airfield Guidance Signage • Laramie Regional Airport, Laramie, Wyoming: Roadway, Parking Lot and Fuel Farm Improvements [with airfield beacon]
• Lee Vining Airport, Lee Vining, California: Runway 15/33 Reconstruction • Long Beach Airport, Daugherty Field, Long Beach, California: (4) o Taxiway Gulf Reconstruction
o North Air Carrier Ramp Improvements: Phase 1-B (Gates 1-5), Phase 2 (Gates 6-10), and Phase 3 (Transition Pavement between New Apron and New Terminal Building and Electrification of Gates 1-11) o Improvements to Taxiway K, Phases I and II
o Runway Guard Lights
• McClellan Air Park, McClellan, California: Lighting Vault Electrical Upgrade 121
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 2-17

JOSHUA NOEGEL

CLIENT SERVICES MANAGER
Josh Noegel is a committed Project Manager with over 20 years of experience pursuing and managing multimillion-dollar complex public works infrastructure projects. He has experience managing Caltrans, FAA, and structural construction projects across the west coast. His experience also consists of material testing and quality control/quality assurance for construction projects. Josh has a proven track record of growing operations through successful project management, rapport building, and proposal activities. He has excellent technical, estimating, and relationship-building abilities. Josh has been a key member on the relevant projects listed below.

AIRPORT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Tracy Municipal Airport, Tracy, California: Reconstruction of Runway 12-30 and Taxiways B, D, and E; Tee Hangar Improvements; Aviation Tie Down Apron Columbia Airport, Columbia, California: Taxiway B and C Rehabilitation; Taxilane Reconstruction and Rehabilitation
Mariposa/Yosemite Airport, Mariposa, California: Apron Rehabilitation Salinas Municipal Airport, Salinas, California: Runway 13-31 and 8-26 Rehabilitation Nut Tree Airport, Vacaville, California: Runway 2-20
Yuba Airport, Olivehurst, California: Transient Apron Tiedown Rehabilitation Travis Air Force Base, Solano County, California: Ramp 400 Phase 1 Buchanan Field Airport, Concord, California: Taxiway E and K; Runway 14L-32R Rehabilitation, Contra Costa County, California
Palo Alto Airport, Palo Alto, California: Apron Reconstruction Oakdale Municipal Airport, Oakdale, California: Airport Rehabilitation Mather Airport, Mather, California: Taxiway Improvements; General Aviation Apron Stockton Airport, Stockton, California: Terminal Apron Extension; Taxiway B Extension; Taxiway D Phase 2, Mill and Overlay Rehabilitation; General Aviation Apron Phase 1 and 2 Rehabilitation
San Jose Airport, San Jose, California: Terminal B, South Ramp Reconstruction Phase 1, 2 and 3; Southeast Apron
San Francisco International Airport, San Francisco, California: Runway 28L Reconstruction; Taxiway B5 Rehabilitation; Runways 1-19s RSA Improvements Project; Taxilanes H and M Realignment; Runway 10R-28L Improvement Oakland International Airport, Oakland, California: North Field Runway Safety Area Improvements
Sacramento International Airport, Sacramento, California: Runway 16L-34R Pavement Rehabilitation; East Taxiway Improvements; Taxiway Delta, Whiskey, Yankee Rehabilitation, Sacramento, California

EXPERIENCE
20+ Years
Years with G3: <1
Education
General Studies
122
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 3-1 SECTION 3
Brandley Engineering’s approach to design and construction of airport facilities centers around consistent involvement and communication with the client and the FAA. At the beginning of each project, we hold a scoping meeting with the client to discuss the scope of the project and identify all technical and functional needs of the Airport and any anticipated challenges or complications. This meeting is critical to ensure our planning and/or design incorporates the needs of the client and fully accommodates the unique challenges that are specific to that airport. In addition, frequent meetings are held with the client throughout the design process to review the status, discuss any new challenges that have been uncovered and ensure the airport’s needs are being accommodated.

Early and frequent involvement with the FAA staff of the San Francisco ADO and Regional Offices is a cornerstone of our philosophy and a key ingredient to efficient FAA approval of projects. In addition, detailed cost estimates are developed early in the design phase to ensure the FAA programed grant funding matches our ultimate design and any modifications affecting costs are coordinated with the FAA.

Brandley Engineering has a qualified staff that works together daily as a team.

We rely on each other, and sub-consultants as necessary, to ensure that top quality, coordinated documents are produced. The ability to work seamlessly together as an efficient team provides us the important capability to ensure that all phases of a project are coordinated and completed in an efficient and cost-effective manner. A project manager from our staff is assigned to each project and is responsible for carrying out the design and construction management for that project.

The basic design of a project can generally be prepared by any qualified engineer, but it is the details incorporated in the design that can make the difference between a short-lived, high-maintenance project and a long-life, low-maintenance project. Knowledge required to develop and incorporate the design details into a set of plans and specifications is obtained by advanced graduate schooling, experience, and research. Our office provides this knowledge and experience to all design and construction projects. From 1953 to the present Brandley Engineering has been providing engineering services for the type of work anticipated at the Oroville Municipal Airport. 3-1 AIRPORT DESIGN
Brandley Engineering’s methodology for the engineering design of projects centers around providing a cost effective and efficient design for each project. The cornerstone of this methodology is the smooth integration of the design and construction of a project.

Each project is designed with careful consideration of the constructability of the design. A project that is designed in a manner that promotes ease of construction will result in decreased construction cost and a more efficient construction while minimizing the disruption to the Airport. One very unique aspect of Brandley Engineering is the intentional diversification of our design and construction management staff. Whereas most firms have one design team and a separate construction management team, our firm has cross trained every staff member in the design and construction management of airfield improvement projects. This ensures our designs are completed with an eye towards constructability, which results in lower bid prices.

Our office has implemented a vigorous quality control program with multiple checks and balances to ensure every document that is submitted is comprehensive, accurate and represents the quality that our name has been associated with for over 70 years.

Each document is thoroughly reviewed by the project manager assigned to that airport and a minimum of one other project engineer from our firm.

Early and frequent involvement with the FAA staff of the San Francisco ADO and Regional Offices is a cornerstone of our project management philosophy and a key ingredient to efficient FAA approval of design projects. In addition, detailed cost estimates are developed early in the design phase to ensure the FAA programed grant funding matches our ultimate design and any modifications affecting costs are coordinated with the FAA.

We have a unique capability of handling all phases of the work in our office or with other team members when necessary and, as a result, can provide a full service on all projects.

APPROACH TO PROJECTS
123
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 3-2 We intimately know the requirements and standards of the Federal Aviation Administration and of the Caltrans Division of Aeronautics and are prepared to proceed quickly with the design of all projects.

Weekly updates are provided to the Project Manager to ensure that the project remains on schedule and within the budget. If any issues arise, they are addressed immediately. The project is continuously monitored to ensure that the best design that meets the needs and constraints of the project is utilized.

Brandley Engineering’s project management process has been fine-tuned over the company’s 70-year history and ensures that projects are completed on time, and at or under budget as a result of our coordination, supervision, and production capabilities.

We are confident that we can provide the same smooth process for the Oroville Municipal Airport projects.

An outline of our process to complete Airport Engineering Design Projects is as follows:

PRELIMINARY

DESIGN PHASE
• Coordinate with the City on project scope, finances, schedules, operational safety and phasing considerations, and other pertinent matters
• Prepare preliminary estimate of construction costs and a schematic design • Prepare pre-applications for FAA funding
• Evaluate local conditions, including environmental constraints • Geotechnical studies as required
• Complete necessary topographic surveys
• Pavement section alternatives analysis

ENGINEERING

DESIGN PHASE

FINAL DESIGN PHASE

BIDDING AND

AWARD PHASE
• Conduct/attend design meetings to obtain information and to coordinate or resolve design matters
• Preparation of CSPP and uploading 7460-1 to OE/AAA website • Complete engineering design of the project including grading, drainage, paving, lighting, marking and electrical systems
• Preparation of Engineer’s Estimate of construction costs • Submit plans to City and FAA for review comments
• Incorporate City and FAA review comments
• Provide final design drawings, specifications (using AC 150/5370-10), and Engineer’s Report including Engineer’s Estimate
• Prepare complete “bid-ready” plans and specifications and submit to City and FAA • Attend pre-bid meeting
• Answer questions and Requests for Information
• Prepare any required addenda
• Analyze bid results and make recommendation to Sponsor for award • Prepare final AIP application and contract documents
3-2 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Brandley Engineering’s approach to the construction management of airport development and improvements centers around consistent involvement and communication with the client, the FAA, and the contractor. At the beginning of each construction project, we hold a preconstruction meeting with the contractor and Airport to review the scope of the project, anticipated project schedule, required submittals, and expected contractor requirements with an emphasis on quality control requirements, conformance to plan and specification and airport safety. This meeting is critical to ensure our management of the construction incorporates the needs of the client and fully accommodates the unique challenges that are specific to that airport including safety on the airport during construction, keeping tenants/FBOs informed of the construction schedule, and creating a schedule that is efficient and cost effective. In addition, weekly meetings are held with the Airport and the contractor throughout the construction phase to review the status and schedule of the construction, discuss any problems encountered, ensure safety plans 124
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 3-3 are being followed, and answer any questions the contractor, the Airport, and/or the tenants may have. This ensures that Brandley Engineering projects are completed on time and within budget.

A unique aspect of Brandley Engineering’s construction management is that our office provides a Resident Engineer that was involved with the original design of the project. We feel that this is critical as the Design Engineer is well versed in the details of why the project was designed the way it was, which allows for the Resident Engineer to quickly answer any questions during construction or assist with any design modifications that may arise due to unforeseen field conditions. The ability of our Resident Engineer to be onsite and make quick decisions will minimize the risk of delays that can arise while a contractor is waiting on a response to a Request for Information (RFI).

Throughout construction our Resident Engineer will hold weekly construction progress meetings with the Owner, the Contractor, Project Engineer, and any other relevant parties. The purpose of this meeting is to review the safety plan conformance or issues, the contractor’s progress, upcoming schedule, and overall project status. Weekly construction meetings are critical to ensure that the project stays on schedule and within budget. Melissa Brandley will also attend these weekly construction meetings to ensure that any necessary decisions are made to ensure the project stays on schedule and within budget with superior construction quality.

Brandley Engineering’s construction management process has been fine-tuned over the company’s 70-year history and ensures that projects are completed on time, and at or under budget as a result of our coordination, supervision, and production capabilities.

We are confident that we can provide the same smooth process for the Oroville Municipal Airport projects.

An outline of our process for Construction Management/Inspection projects is as follows:

CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT
• Represent the Airport at the Pre-construction Conference and prepare the minutes • Prepare and maintain a master project schedule
• Provide consultation and advice to the Airport during all phases of construction • Provide weekly inspection reports (FAA Form 5370-1) to the Airport and FAA • Maintain all records of construction
• Review and approve all shop drawings and submittals
• Prepare and assist in negotiating any required change orders • Coordination with affected utilities, agencies, and tenants • Prepare payment requests for contractors and reimbursement requests to FAA • Review Operation and Maintenance manuals

RESIDENT

ENGINEERING

AND INSPECTION

SERVICES
• Provide complete construction management services as required, including providing all resident engineering, testing and inspection services
• Review all materials and performance tests for compliance with specifications • Perform field and/or construction surveys if required • Perform final inspection including preparation of “punch list” • Conduct wage rate interviews and review contractor’s weekly payrolls for wage compliance
PROJECT CLOSEOUT • Provide electronic Record Drawings to the Airport and FAA • Provide Final Engineer’s Report to the Airport and FAA that includes summary of materials testing, summary of project change orders, and financial summary • If a grant amendment is required, our office will prepare the grant amendment request to FAA and associated justification
• Obtain releases of liens/claims from the contractors
• Ensure FAA receives all information required to close out grant • Manage and coordinate systems start-up
• Update the Airport Layout Plan to show the new development 125
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 3-4 3-3 AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS
Airfield pavement design and evaluation is a specialty of Brandley Engineering. The founder of Brandley Engineering, Reinard W.

Brandley’s background was in Geotechnical Engineering. He was privileged to do his graduate work at Harvard University under Dr. Karl Terzaghi and Dr. Arthur Casagrande. Mr. Brandley’s research work toward his doctorate at Harvard University was on airfield pavement design and evaluation. It was from this research that he developed the Brandley Fatigue Analysis Method of design of airfield pavements. A description of this design and evaluation procedure was presented in 1975 at a Symposium on Nondestructive Test and Evaluation of Airport Pavements sponsored by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station at Vicksburg, Mississippi. This fatigue analysis method of design utilizes the layered elastic theory and uses a failure criteria of limiting subgrade deflection/strain under applied aircraft loadings. Each section of pavement is evaluated and designed for the forecast aircraft operations anticipated on that section of pavement. Reinard and Damon worked together for over twenty years fine tuning Reinard’s fatigue analysis evaluation procedures to ensure the continuity of the Brandley Fatigue Analysis legacy.

This Fatigue Analysis Methodology for evaluation and design of airfield pavements has a 70 year successful performance record and has been proven time and again to be more accurate than the FAA’s FAARFIELD methodology.

The Brandley Engineering methodology for design of airfield pavements centers on a detailed evaluation of the entire pavement section. This starts with a thorough Geotechnical evaluation by Melissa Brandley to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the geotechnical support system underlying the pavements. This includes evaluation of the risk of soft and unstable subgrade and proper treatment to stabilize portions of subgrade, if necessary, in the most cost efficient and effective way possible. In addition, proper evaluation of thickness and quality of the existing pavement section layers is an important design consideration as it is a key factor in determining the potential options available to utilize recycled materials in a cost effective manner. Finally, the Brandley Fatigue Analysis Methodology for design of airfield pavements is utilized to develop a detailed cost benefit analysis of various pavement design alternatives in order to select the final pavement section which will provide the most cost effective, long life and low maintenance pavements for the Oroville Municipal Airport. 3-4 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PLANS (PMMP)
The FAA has a requirement for the Sponsor, in order to remain eligible for Federal funding, to prepare and maintain an updated copy of the Pavement Maintenance Management Plan (PMMP) for airports. A Pavement Maintenance Management Plan at Oroville Municipal Airport was prepared by Brandley Engineering in 2024. Pavement Maintenance Management Plans are a specialty of Brandley Engineering and our unique approach to PMMPs is described below.

A proper Pavement Maintenance Management Plan includes a thorough evaluation of the existing pavement in order to identify and address the cause of the pavement issues, instead of throwing money at the symptoms. Reinard W. Brandley, Founder of Brandley Engineering, did his graduate work at Harvard University under Dr. Karl Terzaghi and Dr. Arthur Casagrande, the two top professionals in the field of geotechnical engineering. Mr. Brandley’s research work toward his doctorate at Harvard University was on airfield pavement design and evaluation. It was from this research that he developed the Brandley Fatigue Analysis method of design of airfield pavements. This methodology has a 70-year performance record with a 90 to 95 percent success rate in predicting remaining life of a pavement section under forecast traffic and is utilized in every Brandley Engineering Pavement Maintenance Management Plan.

Most standard FAA Pavement Maintenance Management Plans only evaluate the surface distress apparent in the existing pavement but do not include any evaluation or consideration of deep-seated distress. It is ideal and more cost effective to rehabilitate the pavement prior to deep-seated distress occurring. By only considering surface distress, an Engineer is only evaluating the existing condition of the surface with no determination of the cause of the distress and no forecasting of future distress and failure. This often results in throwing money at the symptoms instead of determining the cause of the problem and designing a proper solution.

The Brandley Engineering Pavement Maintenance Management Plan analysis utilizes our geotechnical expertise and the Brandley Fatigue Analysis technology, along with the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), which will provide the City with the most economical, long-life pavement design and maintenance programs for Oroville Municipal Airport. A FAA FAARFIELD pavement evaluation analysis will also be prepared to satisfy FAA requirements.

All Pavement Maintenance Management Plans developed by Brandley Engineering include evaluation of both deep-seated distress and surface distress. This allows the Airport to gain a complete picture of the current condition of their pavements, determine the cause of the existing distresses, and accurately forecast future distress and failures so the Airport and their consultant can properly plan rehabilitation projects to take place prior to failure. In addition, detailed cost benefit analyses are conducted to determine the proper rehabilitation method for each pavement section. 126
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 3-5 Brandley Engineering’s processes in the development of a Pavement Maintenance Management Plan is as follows:

GEOTECHNICAL AND

PAVEMENT TESTING

DEEP-SEATED

DISTRESS EVALUATION

TRAFFIC

DETERMINATION AND

FORECASTS
• Existing pavement sections will be researched from as built drawings and/or coring operations if necessary
• Detailed geotechnical studies will be conducted by drilling test holes to depths of 10 feet and sampling, classifying and testing native soils
• Non-destructive testing will be conducted to obtain necessary basic data to evaluate existing strength of airfield pavements
• All pavements will be tested with the heavy weight deflectometer (HWD) equipment with spacing of 100 to 200 feet
• Modulus of Elasticity of each layer of the pavement section and subsoils will be backcalculated from the HWD test results • Current and forecasted traffic loading will be modeled on each section of pavement • Brandley Fatigue Analysis methodology and FAA FAARFIELD methodology will be used to predict remaining life and time of failure under fatigue loading. • A determination of the current and forecast traffic at the airport will be made on each segment of airfield pavement based on the Airport’s traffic records and forecasts.

SURFACE DISTRESS

EVALUATION PAVEMENT

CONDITION INDEX (PCI)
• A detailed visual inspection will be made of all pavements. The scope of investigation will be performed as set forth in ASTM D5340, Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys.

Once these surveys are complete, Pavement Condition Indexes (PCI) will be assigned to each section of pavement.

ANALYSIS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the PCI Determination and deep-seated distress analysis, the following analyses are made:
• Time and type of strengthening or rehabilitation or reconstruction required for each section
• Recommendation of different types of strengthening, overlaying, or reconstruction as needed
• Cost benefit analyses of various rehabilitation options to determine the most costeffective rehabilitation

REHABILITATION
COSTS

PMMP REPORT
Preliminary cost analyses will be conducted to determine the estimated cost of the recommended maintenance and rehabilitation.

A PMMP report is prepared that summarizes all data obtained in the PCI determination, deep-seated distress study, traffic forecasts, and analysis and resulting recommendations.

The report will include a detailed pavement rehabilitation plan and schedule including estimated costs.
127
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 3-6 3-5 AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (ACIP) MAINTENANCE For all our clients we provide assistance in planning and development of their Airport Capital Improvement Plan (ACIP), including meeting with the client and the FAA to review the desired development at the airport and preparing the ACIP including estimates of cost and sketch maps.

Our approach to development of a useful and practical Airport Capital Improvement Plan (ACIP) centers around a detailed knowledge of the Airport, including the existing infrastructure (pavements, lighting, navigational aids etc.) and how the Airport serves its surrounding community. This enables us to identify and prioritize upcoming projects to both maintain and improve the existing infrastructure and to develop new infrastructure to allow the Airport to better serve its community. The Airport’s Pavement Maintenance Management Plan (PMMP) is a valuable guide in prioritizing the rehabilitation needs of existing pavements, and the Airport’s Airport Layout Plan and Narrative Report is a valuable guide in prioritizing the need for new development on the Airport.

The ideal ACIP includes finding a balance between the Airport’s needs and priorities and FAA’s funding priorities, as well as the client’s available matching funds. As a result, we develop an ACIP that provides the Airport with a useful and realistic plan to achieve their goals and places the Airport in a position to have the maximum competitive advantage for receiving discretionary funding for FAA AIP grants.

Brandley Engineering’s close working relationship with the FAA offices at the District and Regional levels positions our office to know when and where Federal funding is available and to optimize the potential of obtaining funding for development of the Oroville Municipal Airport.
3-6 AIP GRANT ADMINISTRATION
Brandley Engineering’s approach to grant administration centers around consistent involvement and communication with the client, the FAA, and the State Division of Aeronautics.

Melissa Brandley will coordinate all grant administration and work with the City of Oroville and the FAA and the State to ensure all requirements and needs are met. Melissa has been working with the San Francisco ADO of the FAA since 2004, which provides a unique advantage in scheduling required meetings and determining their specific requirements for a project. She is very experienced in attending public meetings and presenting proposed development and FAA standards and requirements on airports to keep the public and tenants of the airport informed. Melissa and Alaire will work together to prepare grant applications, bidding, award and contract documents, and grant payment requests up to and including the final close-out of the grant.

There are many steps that are taken in administering Airport Improvement Program grants from the initial preapplication to the final closeout documents. Brandley Engineering has processes in place to provide our clients with all the necessary documents to successfully manage our clients’ AIP grants. The key ingredient is that we stay in constant communication with our clients to ensure the documents are prepared according to their needs. Our processes for AIP grant administration are set forth as follows:
• PREAPPLICATION - Preparation of initial preapplications that set forth the anticipated projects, including a detailed program narrative and preliminary cost estimates. These preapplications are sent to the client for signature and forwarding to the FAA. • IFE SCOPE OF WORK – We prepare a detailed scope of work to facilitate a clear and concise understanding of the extent of the engineering work entailed on a project in order to allow the sponsor preparation of the IFE in a simple and cost effective manner. • FINAL APPLICATION - Once bids have been received for construction projects or final costs have been determined for design/ planning/environmental projects, the final application is prepared that includes the final costs for the grant. This application is sent to the client for signature and forwarding to the FAA. For construction projects our office prepares the Abstract of Bids to be included with the final application.
• GRANT PAYMENT REQUESTS - For most of our airports, including the Oroville Municipal Airport, we prepare grant payment requests for AIP-funded projects. This includes the preparation of the SF 271, Outlay Report and Request for Reimbursement and Invoice Summary as needed, and the SF 425, Federal Financial Report, at the end of the year. For each grant payment request we coordinate with the Airport to determine all costs on the project including engineering costs, construction costs, and administration costs.
• FINAL CLOSEOUT DOCUMENTS – Once the project has been completed and all final costs have been determined based on close coordination with the Airport, final financial closeout documents are prepared. These include the final drawdown request (SF 271), the final Federal Financial Report (SF 425), a summary of final project costs, and a draft letter for the Airport to send these documents to FAA with a request to close out the grant. 128
Item 4.

OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT - STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS • FEBRUARY 7, 2025 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT • 3-7 3-7 UNDERSTANDING AND FAMILIARITY WITH OROVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Brandley Engineering has been working with the City of Oroville on the improvement and development of the Oroville Municipal Airport since 1985. We have prepared the Airport Master Plan Update, the Pavement Maintenance Management Plan, and the engineering design and construction management of the overlay of both runway complexes, medium intensity runway lighting systems, security fencing, Runway 2-20 extension, crack seal of airfield pavements, new REILs, wind cone, and PAPIs, drainage improvements, reconstruction of airfield pavements, and construction of Taxiway K. As a result, we have all base data on file and the understanding of the City’s needs and goals for Oroville Municipal Airport.

Melissa Brandley has very detailed knowledge of the existing conditions, needs and goals of the Oroville Municipal Airport. She personally designed all projects listed in Section 1 of this SOQ beginning in 2005.

Melissa Brandley’s approach to securing funding for the important Rehabilitate Runway 2-20 project is described in the Oroville Municipal Airport ACIP strategy discussion in Section 1-1 of this SOQ. In addition to securing funding for this important project, the project scoping and pavement design for this project is of utmost importance to preserving the size and capacity of this runway.

The FAA has specific definitions for pavement “rehabilitation” vs pavement “reconstruction” projects. Per FAA requirements “rehabilitation” projects are designed to the existing pavement dimensions and configurations while pavement “reconstruction” projects are designed to the current FAA standard for that size airport. Oroville Municipal Airport does not currently have the traffic to support a Runway Design Code (RDC) larger than A I Small. The FAA design standard for an A I Small RDC is a runway width of 60 feet and much shorter length than the current 6,020 length. If the Rehabilitate Runway 2-20 project pavement design is scoped to fall under the “reconstruction” designation, the runway would be mandated to be narrowed from 100 feet wide to 60 feet wide and significantly shortened. This would be very detrimental to the long term viability of this airport and its ability to support larger jet aircraft. Brandley Engineering has been very intentional in its protection of the scope of this project to ensure it falls under the “rehabilitation” designation. This included our analysis in the Pavement Maintenance Management Plan to ensure the pavement analysis and recommendations from this report support and justify “rehabilitation” vs “reconstruction” of Runway 2-20.

Brandley Engineering’s expertise in geotechnical and pavement design, comprehension of the critical project scoping (rehabilitation) and funding strategy for the Runway 2-20 project combined with our long background and base of knowledge of Oroville Municipal Airport, places us in a position to provide the best engineering design and construction management services for the Oroville Municipal Airport.
129
Item 4.

When you bring in Brandley Engineering, you will work directly with Principals Melissa and Damon Brandley on the phone, in meetings, on site during planning. Every time.

You Hire Brandley,
You Get Brandley.

Melissa Brandley, P.E Damon Brandley, P.E
130
Item 4.

Page 1 ends

Oroville City CouncilJune 17, 2025

Oroville City Council
June 17, 2025