Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Oxnard City Council
January 18, 2022

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
January 18, 2022
Body
Oxnard City Council
Pages
22
Original file
145.2 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on oxnardca.api.civicclerk.com. That file is the official record.

(APNs: 185-0-221-025, 185-0-221-265, and 185-0-223-015) (Attachment A). The project includes a General Plan Amendment request to change the 2030 General Plan land use designation of the project site from Business Research Park (BRP) to Residential Medium (RM) (PZ 20-620-02), a Zone Change to change the zoning of the project site from Business Research Park to Multiple-Family (R-2) (PZ 20-570-02), and a Tentative Subdivision Map (Tract No. 6064) for condominium purposes and to combine three existing lots into two lots (PZ 20-300-02). An Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND 2004-11) that was prepared for the 2004 Dunkirk Drive Project will be considered by the Planning Commission at the public hearing for the Portofino Place project. For the purposes of this staff report, the foregoing project description shall be referred to as the “Project.” Filed by the Law Office of K.M. Neiswender, P.O. Box 1225, Blue Jay, CA 92317( the “Applicant”).

Please see the reduced Project plans (Attachment B) for more details. 3) Existing & Surrounding Land Uses: The Project area is a rectangular 7.61-acre, flat site that is bisected by Portofino Place. The western half of the Project site has a land area of approximately 4.88 acres and the easterly half has a land area of 2.73 acres and both sections are vacant and undeveloped. The project site is surrounded by Fifth Street and industrial uses to the north of the project site. The Oxnard Airport is located immediately to the north of the industrial land uses. Juan Lagunas Soria Elementary School is located to the east of the project site. A recently constructed car wash business is located to the west of the project site.

The Project site is surrounded immediately to the south by a 41 single-family residential subdivision and a 101 multiple-family subdivision.

The table below provides uses, City General Plan designations, and zoning. Attachment A includes a regional location and vicinity map, an aerial photo of the project site and surrounding area, and an Oxnard General Plan and zoning designation map.

LOCATION GENERAL PLAN

DESIGNATION ZONING DESIGNATION EXISTING LAND USE
Project
Site
Existing:

Business Research
Park
Proposed:

Residential Medium
Existing:

Business and Research Park
(BRP)
Proposed:

Multiple-Family (R-2)
Vacant
North Airport Compatible
Light Manufacturing/ Planned
Development
(M-1-PD)
Industrial/ Oxnard
Airport
East School Community Reserve (C-R) Juan Lagunas Soria
Elementary School
341
Portofino Place; PZ Nos. 19-500-04 (SUP); 20-300-02 (TSM); 20-570-02 (ZC); 20-620-02 (GPA) Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2021

Page 3 of 18 ends

South
Open Space
Residential Low/
Residential Medium
Single-Family/Planned
Development (R-1-PD) &
Garden Apartment/ Planned
Development (R-3-PD)
Residential Subdivisions
West Commercial
General
General Commercial/Planned
Development (C-2-PD) Carwash
4) Background Information: The Project site is located south of the Oxnard Airport, at the southwesterly and southeasterly corners of Fifth Street and Portofino Place, within the Sea View Estates Neighborhood, and is part of a larger 17-acre project site that has been developed in phases. Prior to 2004, the 17-acre project site had a 2020 General Land Use designation of Business Research Park (BRP) and was zoned BRP. In 2004, the Council approved a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to designate 7.885 acres of the 17-acre project site as residential. At that time, just south of the subject site, Council approved a Tentative Subdivision Map and Special Use Permit for the construction of a 41 single-family residential subdivision. Based on the 2004 project approval, the 2020 General Plan land use designation and zoning for the remaining 7.61 acres was to be changed to Commercial General and General Commercial (C-2) through a separate General Plan Amendment and Zone Change application, but the applicant did not proceed with the application and it remained BRP.

On March 19, 2019, a Pre-Application (PZ 18-600-02) was presented to the City Council requesting that City Council review and provide preliminary comments on:
● A Pre-Application to construct a 90-unit residential project, inclusive of an office/gym/pool building; associated parking spaces; and children’s play area; and ● The applicant’s request to pay the City’s affordable housing in-lieu fee instead of constructing the affordable housing units onsite.

The Pre-Application process allows City Council members an opportunity to make individual comments concerning a future development project. The Council’s preliminary comments may be helpful for the applicant to refine the proposal or to determine whether entitlement should be pursued for a formal proposal. Comments provided by the Council on a Pre-Application do not constitute a decision or endorsement of the proposal. In accordance with State Law, no formal direction or decision making will take place until such time as a formal application has been filed and has undergone appropriate environmental review and evaluation for consistency with adopted City plans and policies and public notice has been provided. Input provided by the Council will help inform the Applicant’s decision to proceed through the entitlement process.

At the meeting, the majority of the City Council members generally found the residential project to be acceptable at the site. However, the majority of discussion centered on the affordable housing in-lieu fee request. The City Council collectively commented that the fees were too low and residential projects should include affordable housing units onsite given the affordable housing in-lieu fee. The City Council had not previously supported developers' 342
Portofino Place; PZ Nos. 19-500-04 (SUP); 20-300-02 (TSM); 20-570-02 (ZC); 20-620-02 (GPA) Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2021

Page 4 of 18 ends

request to pay the affordable housing in-lieu fees based on the lower affordable housing in-lieu fee payments, and instead the City Council directed applicants to construct the affordable units onsite.

On June 2, 2020, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2980, which updated affordable housing requirements for new developments and affordable housing in-lieu fee payments.

The City’s previous Inclusionary Housing Ordinance was last updated in 2006 and established fees that were considerably lower. The applicant has elected to provide the required affordable housing units onsite instead of requesting the affordable housing in-lieu fee payment which would total a maximum of approximately $3,240,000. 5) Environmental Determination: In 2004, an MND (No. 04-11) was prepared to evaluate the 2004 Dunkirk Drive Project which consisted of commercial development on a 7.6-acre portion of the project site as well as residential development on an adjacent 10-acre property to the south of the site (“original project”). The 10-acre residential development involved the construction of 41 single family residences and the remaining 7.6-acre development involved the development of three commercial lots along 5th Street. A Tentative Tract Map (Tract No. 5640) was proposed to create the 44 lots (41 residential and 3 commercial) and included the construction of Portofino Place, portions of Dunkirk Drive, and two cul-de-sacs (Riviera Court and Quilan Court). The original project required a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designations for the site at that time from Business Research Park (BRP) to Low Residential (RL) for the 10-acre residential component, and from BRP to General Commercial (CG) for the remaining 7-acre commercial area. A Zone Change from Business and Research Park (BRP) to Single-Family Residential (R-1) and General Commercial (C-2) was also required for the original project. A Special Use Permit was proposed to entitle the proposed RL land use. Potential environmental impacts associated with the project were identified throughout the MND, along with applicable mitigation measures where necessary.

There were no Significant and Unavoidable Impacts identified in the 2004 MND. The General Plan Amendment from BRP to RL and the Zone Change from BRP to R-1 were approved for the 10-acre residential component of the original project. The Tentative Tract Map and Special Use Permit for the residential development were also approved. The 41 residential units were completed in 2006 along with all required infrastructure.

The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND 2004-11) from 2004 determined that the project would not have a significant impact if the mitigation measures described in the MND were incorporated into the project.

An environmental consultant, under the supervision of Planning Division staff, has prepared Addendum No. 1 to the approved Final MND 2004-11 to evaluate potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project (see Attachments C and D). Addendum No. 1 to the Final MND 2004-11 was prepared pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public resources Code § 21000, et seq.), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 California Code of Regulations, §15000, et seq., CEQA Guidelines), and the City’s Environmental Review Guidelines. The City of Oxnard is the Lead Agency. 343
Portofino Place; PZ Nos. 19-500-04 (SUP); 20-300-02 (TSM); 20-570-02 (ZC); 20-620-02 (GPA) Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2021

Page 5 of 18 ends

Addendum No. 1 is appropriate pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15164 since only minor changes and additions to Final MND 2004-11 are necessary to address the Project changes and no circumstances exist calling for the preparation of an additional CEQA document pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15162 and 15163.

The Addendum reviews the potential impacts on the sixteen environmental issues studied in the previously adopted IS/MND. The Addendum compares the environmental effects of the current proposed project to the effects of the project approved in 2004. The mitigation measures identified in the 2004 MND for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project which are applicable to, and incorporated into the project are listed below for reference.

Section 15164(d) (“Addendum to an EIR or Negative Declaration”) of the CEQA Guidelines states: “The decision making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project”. The Final MND 2004-11, as updated by, and inclusive of, the Addendum, concludes that the proposed project would not create any new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts beyond those identified in the previously adopted Final MND 2004-11. Consistent with State Law, Addendum No. 1 does not require public circulation because it does not provide significant new information that changes the Final MND 2004-11 in a way that deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse environmental effect of the Project or a feasible way to mitigate or avoid such an effect.

All mitigation measures included in the adopted Final MND 2004-11 and Addendum No. 1 have been included as conditions of approval in the project Resolutions.

Air Quality
C-1: Developer shall ensure that all construction equipment is maintained and tuned to meet applicable Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and California Air Resources Board (CARB) emission requirements. At such times as new emission control devices or operational modifications are found to be effective, Developer shall immediately implement such devices or operational modifications on all construction equipment.

C-2: During smog season (May through October), Developer shall lengthen the construction period so as to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating at the same time.

C-3: At all times during construction activities, Developer shall minimize the area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations to prevent excessive amounts of dust.

C-4: During construction, Developer shall water the area to be graded or excavated prior to commencement of grading or excavation operations. Such application of water shall be at least twice per day and shall penetrate sufficiently to minimize fugitive dust during grading activities.

C-5: During construction, Developer shall control dust by the following activities:
● All trucks hauling graded or excavated material offsite shall be required to cover their loads as required by California Vehicle Code §23114, with special attention to Sections 344
Portofino Place; PZ Nos. 19-500-04 (SUP); 20-300-02 (TSM); 20-570-02 (ZC); 20-620-02 (GPA) Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2021

Page 6 of 18 ends

23114(b)(F), (e)(2) and (e)(4) as amended, regarding the prevention of such material spilling onto public streets and roads.
● All graded and excavated material, exposed soils areas, and active portions of the construction site, including unpaved onsite roadways, shall be treated to prevent fugitive dust. Treatment shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, periodic watering, application of environmentally-safe soil stabilization materials, and/or roll-compaction as appropriate. Watering shall be done as often as necessary and reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible.

C-6: During construction, Developer shall post and maintain onsite signs, in highly visible areas, restricting all vehicular traffic to 15 miles per hour or less.

C-7: During periods of high winds (i.e. wind speed sufficient to cause fugitive dust to impact adjacent properties), Developer shall cease all clearing, grading, earth moving, and excavation operations to prevent fugitive dust from being a nuisance or creating a hazard, either onsite or offsite.

C-8: Throughout construction, Developer shall sweep adjacent streets and roads at least once per day, preferably at the end of the day, so that any visible soil material and debris from the construction site is removed from adjacent roadways.

Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources
E-1: Developer shall contract with a qualified archaeologist to conduct a Phase I cultural resources survey of the project site prior to issuance of any grading permits. The survey shall include: (1) an archaeological and historical records search through the California Historical Resources Information System at CalState Fullerton; and (2) a field inspection of the project site. Upon completion, the Phase I survey report shall be submitted to the Planning Division for compliance verification. A copy of the contract for these services shall be submitted to the Planning Division Manager for review and approval prior to initiation of the Phase I activities.

The contract shall include provisions in case any cultural resources are discovered onsite. In the event that any historic or prehistoric cultural resources are discovered, work in the vicinity of the find shall be halted immediately. The archaeologist shall evaluate the discovery and determine the necessary mitigations for successful compliance with all applicable regulations. Developer or its successor in interest shall be responsible for paying all salaries, fees and the cost of any future mitigation resulting from the survey.

E-2: Developer shall contract with a Native American monitor to be present during all subsurface grading, trenching or construction activities on the project site. The monitor shall provide a monthly report to the Planning Division summarizing the activities during the reporting period. A copy of the contract for these services shall be submitted to the Planning Division Manager for review and approval prior to issuance of any grading permits. The monitoring report(s) shall be provided to the Planning Division prior to approval of the final building permit signature.
345
Portofino Place; PZ Nos. 19-500-04 (SUP); 20-300-02 (TSM); 20-570-02 (ZC); 20-620-02 (GPA) Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2021

Page 7 of 18 ends

Geology and Soils
F-1: Developer shall submit a site-specific soils investigation, which shall be prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer. At a minimum, such study shall include liquefaction and compressible soil characteristics on the subject site, and shall identify any necessary construction techniques or other mitigation measures to prevent significant liquefaction/compressible soils impacts upon the proposed project. all recommendations of said report shall be incorporated into the project. Developer shall submit the report to the Building Official for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.

Land Use and Planning
G-2: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall file a Form 7460, “Notice of Proposed Construction with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and provide a copy to the Planning Division that enables the FAA to review the development for any hazard to airport/aviation operations.

Noise
K-1: The applicant shall provide a notice to potential homebuyers disclosing the presence of the Oxnard Airport and a helicopter flight path along West Fifth Street. The applicant shall provide such notice to each homebuyer and obtain signatures acknowledging the presence of the Oxnard Airport and helicopter flight path along West Fifth Street.

There was only one mitigation measure identified in MND 2004-11 that does not apply to the current project.

G-1: Developer shall submit plans to the Community Development Department that clearly indicate that home construction along the northern residential boundary shall be no closer than 400 feet from the centerline of the proposed widening of West Fifth Street.

The mitigation measure is no longer warranted because the City has no plans to widen West Fifth Street. Additionally, the City’s adopted Capital Improvement Plan (2021-2026) does not identify any proposals to widen West Fifth Street or any segment of road near the project vicinity. As such, MND 2004-11 mitigation measure G-1 does not apply to this project and is not included in the Project Resolutions.
6) Analysis:
a) General Discussion: As discussed below, the Project has been found to be consistent with both the 2030 General Plan and the Oxnard City Code (OCC).

The Planning Commission is the decision maker for Special Use Permit pursuant to OCC Section 16-531. The Planning Commission makes recommendations to the City Council for Tentative Subdivision Maps (OCC Section 15-40), Zone Changes and General Plan Amendments (OCC Section 16-581).

The project is seeking approval of a condominium map to construct 90 residential units, 346
Portofino Place; PZ Nos. 19-500-04 (SUP); 20-300-02 (TSM); 20-570-02 (ZC); 20-620-02 (GPA) Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2021

Page 8 of 18 ends

inclusive of attached two-car garages; a 3,281 square-foot recreational building; swimming pool, and associated amenities and site improvements. There will be 6 unit types that provide variation to the square-footage and interior layouts.

Unit Type Total Living Floor
Area (Square Feet)
Number of
Bedrooms
Unit Quantity
A 1,441 sq. ft.
1,482 sq. ft.
2 3
12 12
B 1,441 sq. ft.
1,482 sq. ft.
2 3
13 13
C 1,467 sq. ft.
1,482 sq. ft.
2 3
4 4
D 1,441 sq. ft.
1,508 sq. ft.
2 3
5 5
E 1,467 sq. ft.
1,482 sq. f.t
2 3
7 7
F 1,441 sq. ft.
1,508 sq. ft.
2 3
4 4
Construction activities, anticipated uses, and development design will be subject to standard construction requirements of the Building, Fire, and Traffic Codes. Additionally, the project has been reviewed by the Development Advisory Committee, including City Departments and outside agencies. Through this multi-Department review, it was determined that the Project would have no significant impact on the public health, safety, or welfare.
b) General Plan Consistency: The City’s 2030 General Plan land use designation for the project site is BRP. A General Plan Amendment (GPA) is proposed to change the land use designation from BRP to Residential Medium. A corresponding zone change is also proposed to change the zoning from Business Research Park to Multiple-Family (R-2).

According to Section 3.5 of the 2030 General Plan, the existing BRP land use designation allows uses such as:
● Administrative, executive, and/or corporate offices which are a part of a predominantly industrial operation, including governmental offices and facilities; ● Adult businesses (except adult motels);
● Adult day care facilities;
347
Portofino Place; PZ Nos. 19-500-04 (SUP); 20-300-02 (TSM); 20-570-02 (ZC); 20-620-02 (GPA) Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2021

Page 9 of 18 ends

● Agricultural, limited to growing of crops;
● Distribution, warehousing, and wholesaling;
● Garment manufacturing; laboratories (research only);
● Manufacture and assembly of electrical and electronic instruments; ● Product assembly plants and production facilities primarily engaged in final or partial assembling;
● Research and development, experimental or developmental laboratories; ● Clinical laboratories and uses including associated incidental and outpatient clinics; and
● Trade schools, public and private schools and colleges.

The proposed GPA to Residential Medium and corresponding Zone Change will allow the property to be developed with the proposed 90-unit condominium project (with a density of 12 units per acre), which is allowable under the R-2 development standards on approval of a Special Use Permit (OCC Section 16-42).

With approval of the Zone Change to R-2 zone (Multiple-Family), the project would be consistent with the amended 2030 General Plan land use map and land use designations and standards (Goals and Policies, Sections 3.3 and 3.5).

West Fifth Street at this location is a designated scenic corridor which requires a landscaped buffer of at least 30 feet. The project has been designed to include a 30-foot landscape buffer along the totality of the West Fifth Street frontage.

Consistency with 2030 General Plan policies is defined by the relationship between the policies (Goals and Policies, Section 3.6 and Chapters 4 through 8, inclusive) and the proposed project. The three consistency classification levels are:

I. Direct Applicability to a Proposed Project or Program (full text of the policy and an explanation).

II. Related or Indirect Applicability to the Proposed Project or Program (policy title and an explanation for each or groups of related or indirectly related policies).

III. No or Distant Applicability to the Proposed Project or Program (all policies not listed as Level I and II are assumed to be consistent).

The project’s consistency review with 2030 General Plan policies is included as Attachment E and finds the project consistent with General Plan policies. c) Conformance with Zoning Development Standards: If the GPA request to change the land use designation from BRP to Residential Medium is approved, the proposed project would be developed under the Multiple-Family (R-2) zone district.

In accordance with the OCC Section 16-42(C), the proposed 90-unit condominium project is permitted with approval of a Special Use Permit (SUP). The applicable development standards for the project are identified within the R-2 section found under OCC Chapter 16, Division 3 (R-2 Multiple-Family Zone). A complete zoning 348
Portofino Place; PZ Nos. 19-500-04 (SUP); 20-300-02 (TSM); 20-570-02 (ZC); 20-620-02 (GPA) Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2021

Page 10 of 18 ends

conformance analysis is provided as Attachment F.

The project is seeking approval of a condominium map to construct 90 residential units, inclusive of attached two-car garages; a 3,281 square-foot recreational building; swimming pool, and associated amenities and site improvements which are conditionally permitted within the R-2 zoning with approval of a Special Use Permit, pursuant to Section 16-42(C) of the Oxnard City Code (OCC). Pursuant to OCC Section 16-43, the maximum allowed height of any building is two stories, not to exceed 25 feet. The project has been designed with structures with various heights and levels but not to exceed two stories and the maximum allowed height of 25 feet. Based on OCC Section 16-44, the maximum density allowed is based on a minimum lot area of 3,500 square feet per dwelling unit. The project proposes to construct 90 units, which is below the maximum allowed density of 94 units. The density of the proposed development is similar to the multi-family residential development adjacent to the project area.

In addition to the R-2 development standards, City Council Resolution No. 7658 provides advisory standards that are intended to encourage amenities that enhance the livability of condominiums but are not mandatory (Attachment E). The amenities contained within City Council Resolution No. 7658 include minimum dwelling size; number of bedrooms; distance to parking spaces; private patios; storage; common areas; and security. While a developer is not required to provide all of the amenities within City Council Resolution No. 7658, the project has been designed to include all of the amenities with the exception of the required dimensions for private patios. City Council Resolution No. 7658 recommends that every unit include private patios with minimum dimensions of 10 feet by 10 feet (land area= 100 square feet). However, the project is designed for every unit to have private patios with various dimensions with some units having private patios that are not designed with the minimum dimensions identified in City Council Resolution No. 7658. However, the land area of the project’s private patios ranges from 450 to 1,530 square feet which exceeds the minimum land area of 100 square feet provided by private patios designed under City Council Resolution No. 7658. A complete analysis of the project’s compliance with City Council Resolution No. 7658 is provided as Attachment H.

OCC Chapter 16, Division 2 outlines development standards for attached dwelling units for any new attached multi-family residential project of six or more units. The attached dwelling unit development standards are required for structures that contain six or more units. The project proposes 45 duplex structures for a total of 90 residential units under a condominium map. As such, the attached dwelling unit development standards do not apply to this project because there are no proposed structures that contain six or more units. The project is designed to meet the R-2 development standards and meets all but one of the advisory standards identified within City Council Resolution No. 7658 as discussed in detail in the previous paragraph.
349
Portofino Place; PZ Nos. 19-500-04 (SUP); 20-300-02 (TSM); 20-570-02 (ZC); 20-620-02 (GPA) Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2021

Page 11 of 18 ends

The project’s compliance with the City’s Affordable Housing Ordinance is discussed below in Section “j.”
d) Tentative Tract Map: Tentative Map No. 6064 is requested for subdividing the existing

7.61 project site (three parcels) for condominium purposes into two lots. ● Lot 1 will be improved with 60 units, gated entry, swimming pool and playground area, parking and associated site improvements.
● Lot 2 will be improved with 30 units, gated entry, recreational building, parking and associated site improvements.

Even though the subdivision is bisected by Portofino Place, tract conditions as outlined in the Project approval documents will be applied to both lots as one entity and the subdivision will be governed by a single homeowner’s association. Residents will have access to both lots and enjoy amenities offered throughout the project site.

The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Subdivision Map Act, City Code Chapters 15 (Subdivisions) and 16 (Zoning Ordinance). The R-2 zoning and 2030 General Plan allow one unit per 3,500 square feet, which equates to 94 dwelling units on the property, specifically, multi-family units. The proposed subdivision, inclusive of the 90 condominiums, swimming pool and playground, recreational building, property/private walls; 7-foot entry gates, landscaping, parking, sidewalks are consistent with the policies and provisions of the 2030 General Plan because the proposed land use, and density of the project is of a multi-family use, which is an allowed use pursuant to the Residential Medium land use designation identified in the 2030 General Plan. e) Site Design: The site plan follows the parcel’s rectangular shape bisected by Portofino Place. Access to the condominium project will be primarily off of Fifth Street and Portofino Place. The project has been designed to be consistent with 2030 General Plan policy CD-9.5 which requires to maintain a landscaped buffer corridor of at least 30 feet along designated scenic corridors which Fifth Street is designated as a scenic corridor.

Lot 1 is designed to contain 60 condominium units and Lot 2 will contain 30 condominium units. The perimeter property boundary walls are designed to meet the maximum allowed height and will screen parking and other onsite improvements.

Parking will be contained within each unit’s attached 2-car garage and each unit will provide 2 visitor parking spaces on the unit’s driveway. Parking will not be allowed on the private streets. The 42 visitor surface parking spaces will be distributed throughout both lots and screened by the perimeter walls. A 3,281 square-foot recreational building is contained within Lot 2 and a swimming pool and playground area are located within Lot 2. The project will be governed as a single entity by a homeowner’s association and all amenities will be available to residents of both lots as this development is bisected by Portofino Place.
f) Oxnard Airport: As detailed in the Final MND 2004-11, the modified project site is located in the Oxnard Airport Sphere of Influence, which limits the structural coverage to 25 percent. The proposed project is designed to not exceed the 25 percent allowable site 350
Portofino Place; PZ Nos. 19-500-04 (SUP); 20-300-02 (TSM); 20-570-02 (ZC); 20-620-02 (GPA) Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2021

Page 12 of 18 ends

coverage. Additionally, the modified project would be required to implement Mitigation Measures G-2 and K-1 of the Addendum MND 2004-11 to avoid conflicts with airport compatibility requirements by providing necessary buffers as well as filing with and undergoing review by the Federal Aviation Administration. The modified project would also be required to comply with all zoning, land use, and development regulations applicable to the project site. With implementation of Mitigation Measures G-2 and K-1 from the 2004 MND and compliance with applicable regulations, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts associated with applicable land use, habitat conservation, or natural community conservation plans, or dividing an established community. As such, no additional mitigation measures would be required for the proposed project.

Mitigation Measure G-1: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall file a Form 7460, “Notice of Proposed Construction with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and provide a copy to the Planning Division that enables the FAA to review the development for any hazard to airport/aviation operations.

Mitigation Measure K-1: The applicant shall provide a notice to potential homebuyers disclosing the presence of the Oxnard Airport and a helicopter flight path along West Fifth Street. The applicant shall provide such notice to each homebuyer and obtain signatures acknowledging the presence of the Oxnard Airport and helicopter flight path along West Fifth Street.
g) Circulation and Parking: Access to the proposed project will be primarily from driveways established from Portofino Place off of Fifth Street. Two additional driveways will be created to Fifth Street but will be gated and controlled to right turn in and out only with emergency access only. Fifth Street westbound traffic would utilize the existing dedicated left turn pocket to access Portofino Place. Eastbound traffic on Fifth Street will be able to access the project site.

Based upon trip generation estimates from the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) the proposed 90 dwelling units of the project may generate approximately 665 vehicles a day with 51 AM and 62 PM vehicles respectively. Total exiting AM and entering PM vehicles during these peak hours are approximately 40 vehicles resulting in less than 1 vehicle per minute average. The addition of these vehicles throughout the day and during the peak periods are not anticipated to exacerbate current conditions at the primary access intersection of 5th Street and Portofino Place. Additional access to/from the project site will be accommodated through access to the south of the project and distribution of project traffic along Dunkirk to other signalized access points on Patterson Road. It is not anticipated that the additional project traffic added to Portofino Place will require upgrade of traffic control at the intersection with 5th Street.

The City’s Traffic Engineer has conditioned the project to provide for offsite improvements such as:
351
Portofino Place; PZ Nos. 19-500-04 (SUP); 20-300-02 (TSM); 20-570-02 (ZC); 20-620-02 (GPA) Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2021

Page 13 of 18 ends

● Project driveways to Fifth Street will be maintained as right turn in and out only and gated at all times.
● The Developer shall construct two (2) traffic calming devices on Portofino Place.

One will be installed south of Fifth Street and the other between the main project driveway and Dunkirk Drive to reduce the likelihood of excessive vehicle speeds.

Final design shall be subject to approval of the City Traffic Engineer and City Engineer. Final design shall include; a) a speed feedback sign and 2) asphalt speed cushions in both directions to suppress speeds to a 25 MPH design speed objective.
● Prior to occupancy, the project shall install an EMTRAC system at the intersection of Fifth Street and Patterson Road as required by the Fire Department subject to approval of the City Traffic Engineer.
● To enhance pedestrian safety along Fifth Street, the Developer shall retrofit the existing street lights along the project frontage with 4000k LED lights. Lighting upgrades shall be completed prior to occupancy.
● All internal drive aisles shall be designed and maintained as Fire Lanes for parking regulatory and enforcement purposes.
● The Developer shall install traffic control signage, markings, and other traffic control devices along Portofino Place and Fifth Street subject to approval of the City Traffic Engineer.

Since adoption of the 2004 MND the CEQA statute and guidelines have been revised to require evaluation of impacts on the local transportation and circulation system on the basis of vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The City of Oxnard has not adopted any specific significance thresholds related to VMT. The Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (December 2018) provides guidance on analyzing VMT impacts in light of SB 743. The total VMT associated with commercial development under the original project as well as the residential development under the modified project was estimated using CalEEMod.

Based on the CalEEMod analysis, the commercial development under the original project would result in annual VMT of 5,172,230. The modified project would result in substantially reduced annual VMT of 1,812,497, or an average daily VMT of 4,966 (annual VMT divided by 365 days per year). The close proximity to schools and retail businesses promote shorter trip lengths for vehicles with the infill nature of the proposed project.

Therefore, the modified project would result in a net overall decrease in VMT than development of the project site under the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project, resulting in a less than significant transportation impact. Therefore, the proposed project would not create a new significant transportation impact related to VMT that is not identified in the 2004 MND. The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts related to increases in VMT, and no such measures are required for the modified project.
352
Portofino Place; PZ Nos. 19-500-04 (SUP); 20-300-02 (TSM); 20-570-02 (ZC); 20-620-02 (GPA) Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2021

Page 14 of 18 ends

Parking: The project meets the requirements for all parking standards as listed in the following table:

PORTOFINO PLACE CONDOMINIUMS PROJECT

PARKING COMPLIANCE
OCC Requirement
(reference. only) Provided Complies?
Resident parking
45 2 bedroom 2 garage spaces 90 garage spaces Yes
45 3 bedrooms 2 garage spaces 90 garage spaces Yes
Total Resident Parking 180 garage spaces 180 garage space Yes Visitor Parking 60 spaces 222 spaces
Motorcycle Parking None Required 6 motorcycle
Total Parking 240 spaces 408 spaces
Bicycle Parking 12 bicycle parking 12 bicycle parking Yes, as conditioned Each residential unit is designed with an attached 2-car garage on the ground floor. Each unit will contain two parking spaces on the driveway since parking on the private streets will not be allowed. The project is required to provide 60 parking spaces; however the project will provide 222 visitor parking spaces.
h) Building Design: The Project has been designed to incorporate architectural elements found in Craftsman-style architecture on all 90 dwelling units. The proposed height, at two stories and 25 feet maximum, complies with the requirements of the R-2 zone.

Adjacent multi-family dwellings in the adjacent residential tracts range from single to multi-family subdivisions with one and two stories high, and the placement of the proposed structures will not have a towering effect on adjacent 1- and 2-story residences.

The residential units incorporate elements that are consistent with the architecture of surrounding residences. Given that the residences within the Sea View Estates represent an eclectic variety of architectural types with no single or dominant architectural style, the Craftsman-style architecture is fitting for the neighborhood. As the predominant features displayed on the exterior of the residence, the proposed project incorporates 353
Portofino Place; PZ Nos. 19-500-04 (SUP); 20-300-02 (TSM); 20-570-02 (ZC); 20-620-02 (GPA) Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2021

Page 15 of 18 ends

earth tone colors, vinyl windows, gable roof design, balconies, wood post, porcelain tile and fiberglass doors. The proposed construction materials are consistent with the materials used in the construction of surrounding residences. Additionally, the absence of non-glaring material and obtrusive equipment on the proposed roof, allows for the project to blend with the existing environment without making the roof line a dominant feature.

The 3,281 square-foot recreational building has been designed to be consistent with the Craftsman-style architecture theme. The recreational building has been designed to incorporate earth tone stucco finish to the exterior elevations; vinyl window trim; balconies, French doors; and a trellis. The inclusion of the above-mentioned design materials will facilitate the recreational building blending with the proposed 90 townhome units and providing a consistent design theme throughout the project site. i) Landscaping and Open Space: The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of 30% of the lot area be provided for interior yard space (IYS - or public open space); on this project, this represents 96,572 square feet. The project will provide slightly over 34%, which will be 115,660 square feet. The common open space includes on-site amenities such as a common swimming pool and playground, a 3,281 square-foot recreation building, and private patio decks and landscaped walkways and open space.

There are currently 91 existing trees on the project site which will remain and be integrated within the proposed landscaping plan. The proposed plant palette consists of drought-tolerant species in compliance with City landscape standards and water consumption regulations. The project proposes to incorporate 152 additional trees into the project. The proposed tree palette is characterized by low water tolerant species such as the Catalina Ironwood, Marina Madrone, Island Oak, and Naked Coral Tree. The project also proposed the installation of ground coverings that are characterized by low water tolerant species such as Red Yucca, Natal Plum, Black Lace Elderberry and Island Bush Poppy.
j) Affordable Housing: On May 19, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15,330, which adopted the Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fee Nexus Study (Study) and updated Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fees. Additionally, on June 2, 2020, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2980, which updated affordable housing requirements for new developments and Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fee payments. The City’s previous Inclusionary Housing Ordinance was last updated in 2006 and established fees that were considerably lower. The City Council had not previously supported developers' request to pay the Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fees based on the lower Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fee payments, and instead the City Council directed applicants to construct the affordable units onsite.

The project is subject to the City’s inclusionary Ordinance No. 2980 that requires a project with 10 or more residential units to set aside 10 percent of the units as affordable to low income households as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5. The project complies with this requirement by designating 9 units (10% of 90 354
Portofino Place; PZ Nos. 19-500-04 (SUP); 20-300-02 (TSM); 20-570-02 (ZC); 20-620-02 (GPA) Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2021

Page 16 of 18 ends

units) distributed throughout the project as low income affordable. The project has been conditioned to offer three (3) three-bedroom units and two (2) two-bedroom units for rent or sale to households with annual incomes at or below fifty percent (50%) of AMI for Ventura County. Additionally, two (2) two-bedroom units and two (2) three-bedroom units must be offered for rent or sale to households with annual incomes at or below eighty percent (80%) AMI for Ventura County. Prior to offering the Affordable Units for rent, the Developer and Owner must submit to the Housing Director the proposed rental amounts for the affordable rental units for review and approval.

The City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance has two sets of requirements for rental and for sale projects. The project is proposing a Tentative Subdivision Map for the purposes of a condominium map where the developer will retain sole ownership of the development and will offer the units for rent. Since the development is seeking a Tentative Subdivision Map for the purposes of a condominium project, the existing project is required to provide the required number of affordable units based on a for-sale project even though the developer intends to operate the project as a for-rent development. City staff and the developer negotiated a tentative agreement (subject to City Council approval) in order to create a specific mechanism for the developer or successor to comply with the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. The agreement outlines specific steps to be followed before the developer sells one or more of the parcels of the project to a third party. The agreement intends to protect future tenants and creates an orderly process that ensures that the affordable units are offered to the families the units are intended to shelter, whether it is a rental or for-sale unit. The agreement is included in the staff report as Attachment I.
k) Development Impact Fees: The City requires development connection and/or impact fees to be collected as part of any new development to pay a proportional share of providing public services and improvements to new development. The proposed project will be required to pay impact fees for wastewater, water system, water service and meter, storm drain, Traffic (City and County), Growth Requirement Capital Fee, Quimby (park), Park and Recreation Fee, Mobility Fee, Public Art Program Fee, Utility Undergrounding In-Lieu Fee, and General Plan maintenance connection and/or impact fees. Although the project is not required to construct a public park or dedicate land for a public park, the developer will be required to pay the applicable Quimby Fee prior to issuance of any building permits. A fee estimate, based upon current fees, is attached for reference (Attachment J).
7) Development Advisory Committee: The Development Advisory Committee (DAC) reviewed this project on December 18, 2019, February 24, 2021 and May 12, 2021. The DAC process led to changes in the project reflected in the attached plans dated November 11, 2021), including the inclusion of affordable housing units on the project site. Conditions of approval are incorporated in the attached Resolutions for the Tentative Subdivision Map 355
Portofino Place; PZ Nos. 19-500-04 (SUP); 20-300-02 (TSM); 20-570-02 (ZC); 20-620-02 (GPA) Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2021

Page 17 of 18 ends

(Attachment N) and the Special Use Permit for the 90-unit residential dwellings (Attachment O).
8) Community Workshop and Public Input: This Project is located within the Sea View Estates Neighborhood. The applicant mailed notices of the Community Workshop meeting to all property owners within the Sea View Estates Neighborhood, and the project was presented at the April 20, 2020 Community Workshop. Members of the public raised questions regarding the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Portofino Place and Fifth Street, airport compatibility, traffic gridlock during school hours, new traffic travelling through Dunkirk Drive and adequate parking. The majority of the Community Workshop participants felt the project was adequate at the site, but were concerned about the potential impact this project might have on existing traffic conditions. Staff received a petition critical of the project from a member of the community. The petition is provided in Attachment P.

Consistent with public noticing requirements, the Planning Commission hearing was advertised in the newspaper, with an on-going site posting, and by mail to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. To date, Staff has not received any additional concerns or public comments regarding the proposed Project. 9) Appeal Procedure: The requested actions for the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Tentative Subdivision Map are recommendations to the City Council in accordance with OCC Sections 16-581 (Change of Boundaries and Uses), and 15-40 (Subdivisions). In accordance with OCC Section 16-544 the Planning Commission’s action on Special Use Permit for the 90 unit condominium development may be appealed to the City Council within 18 days after the decision date. Appeal forms may be obtained from the City Clerk and must be submitted with the appropriate fees before the end of the appeal period. All aspects of this project shall not become effective unless and until the City Council approves the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Tentative Subdivision Map.

Attachments:

A. Vicinity, General Plan, and Zoning Maps and Aerial Photo B. Reduced Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6064, and Project Plans C. Addendum No. 1 to Final MND 2004-11
D. Final MND 2004-11
E. General Plan Consistency Analysis
F. Zoning Compliance Table (R-2)
G. City Council Resolution No. 7658
H. City Council Resolution No. 7658 Consistency Table
I. Affordable Housing Agreement
J. Estimated Development Impact Fees
K. Resolution (Addendum to Final MND 2004-11)
356
Portofino Place; PZ Nos. 19-500-04 (SUP); 20-300-02 (TSM); 20-570-02 (ZC); 20-620-02 (GPA) Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2021

Page 18 of 18 ends

L. Resolution (General Plan Amendment)
M. Resolution (Zone Change)
N. Resolution (Tentative Subdivision Map)
O. Resolution (Special Use Permit)
P. Petition Received
Q. Staff Presentation
357
3RUWRILQR3ODFH Oxnard, California

UNIT TYPE COUNT

INLINE A

INLINE B
UNIT

RH END CAP A

RH END CAP B

LH END CAP A

LH END CAP B
12 NUMBER OF UNITS
13 5
5 6
4 TOTAL 45
3BR
2BR

UNIT SIZE
45 45

QUANTITY
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
CVRCOVER SHEET SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA

PROPERTY OWNER

PORTOFINO PLACE LLC

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT

CASEY PATTERSON
JOHN F. MORELLI
RESIDENTIAL DESIGNER #RD-74
702-556-1780

STRUCTURAL ENGINEER

CIVIL ENGINEER

ROSS PEABODY
916-375-0135
CONSULTANTS:

ARCHITECTURE
EMAIL: [email protected]
EMAIL: [email protected]

MECHANICAL, PLUMBING & ELECTRICAL
805-466-7629
EMAIL: [email protected]

PROJECT MANAGER

ODETTE GHARIBEH
702-405-1056
INDEX OF SHEETS:

A 3.2 ELEVATIONS "E"
A 3.3 ROOF AND WINDOW PLAN "E"
A 1.0 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN

PROJECT DATA
CVR
DIMENSIONED FIRST FLOOR PLAN "E"
A 2.0
A 2.1
A 3.1

COVER SHEET
A 2.2
A 3.0 ANNOTATED FIRST FLOOR PLAN "E"

SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATIONS
A 1.1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE OVERLAY
A 1.2 ARCHITECTURAL SITE COLOR
A 2.3 SPECIFICATIONS
A 4.2 ELEVATIONS "A"
A 4.3 ROOF AND WINDOW PLAN "A"
A 4.1 DIMENSIONED FIRST FLOOR PLAN "A"
A 4.0 ANNOTATED FIRST FLOOR PLAN "A"
A 5.2 ELEVATIONS "C"
A 5.3 ROOF AND WINDOW PLAN "C"
A 5.1 DIMENSIONED FIRST FLOOR PLAN "C"
A 5.0 ANNOTATED FIRST FLOOR PLAN "C"
A 6.2 ELEVATIONS "F"
A 6.3 ROOF AND WINDOW PLAN "F"
A 6.1 DIMENSIONED FIRST FLOOR PLAN "F"
A 6.0 ANNOTATED FIRST FLOOR PLAN "F"
A 7.2 ELEVATIONS "B"
A 7.3 ROOF AND WINDOW PLAN "B"
A 7.1 DIMENSIONED FIRST FLOOR PLAN "B"
A 7.0 ANNOTATED FIRST FLOOR PLAN "B"
A 8.2 ELEVATIONS "D"
A 8.3 ROOF AND WINDOW PLAN "D"
A 8.1 DIMENSIONED FIRST FLOOR PLAN "D"
A 8.0 ANNOTATED FIRST FLOOR PLAN "D"
A 9.2 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
A 9.1 SECTIONS
A 9.0 SECTIONS


LAVATORY
LOUVER

MACHINE BOLT

MAXIMUM

MATERIAL

MASONRY

MEMBRANE
MIRROR
MEDIUM

NOT IN CONTRACT

OBSCURE

MOLDING

OVERHEAD

ON CENTER

OPPOSITE

OPENING

PLUMBING

PLYWOOD

POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH

POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT

POLYVINYL CHLORIDE

PARTICLE BOARD

SLIDING WINDOW / DOOR
(X=OPEN, O=FIXED)

MISCELLANEOUS

MASONRY OPENING

MANUFACTURE (R)

MECHANIC (AL)
MB

DIFFUSER
DOWN
EACH
EQUAL

ELECTRICAL

DOWNSPOUT

DIVISION

DRAWING

DISPOSAL

DIMENSION

EQUIPMENT
EQ
EQUIP
DIF
DN
DS
DIV
DISP
ELEC
DWG
EA
DIM
PSF
PSI
PVC
PR
PNL
PAIR
PANEL
OBS
PLMB
P/BD
OX/XO
PLWD
OPG
OPP
OH
OC
PLATE
MECH
MISC
MEMB
MO
NIC
NTL
MLDG
MIR
MFR
MED
METAL

ANCHOR BOLT
ABBREVIATIONS:

BEAM
BLOCK

BUILDING
BOTTOM

BLOCKING

BETWEEN

BEARING

ALTERNATE

ADJUSTABLE
COLUMN

CLEAR (ANCE)
CEMENT

CEILING

CABINET

CEILING JOIST

CERAMIC

CEILING HEIGHT

CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT
DETAIL
CENTER
CARPET

CONSTRUCTION

DIAMETER

COLD WATER

DIAGONAL

CONTINUOUS OR CONTINUE

CONCRETE (CAST-IN-PLACE)

AIR CONDITIONING
BLKG
CMU
COL
CPT
CTR
CONT
CONST
DIAG
DIA
DET
CW
CONC
BM
BTM
BRG
CER
CLG
CJ
CEM
CAB
CLR
CLG HT
AB
ALT
BLDG
BET
ADJ
BLK
A/C
MATL
LAV
MAX
LVR
MAS

PLUMBING

NS NON - STANDARD
PB

RETURN AIR

RAD RADIUS
RA

DETAIL REFERENCE

REFERENCE SHEET

PLAN GRID LINES

WORK POINT, CONTROL

REVISION CLOUD AND MARK

SECTION REFERENCE

REFERENCE SHEET

ELEVATION REFERENCE

REFERENCE SHEET

INTERIOR ELEVATION
A
1 DOOR/WINDOW TAG

ELEVATION

SYMBOLS
A
A
A
A8.0
A
ENTRY
112
16-0" CL'G

ROOM NAME, NUMBER &

CEILING HEIGHT

FINISHED FLOOR
100'-0"
B
DA C
A3.0
A9.0
1 EJ EXPANSION JOINT
PL
OSB

CL CENTER LINE

BAR REBAR

PLAM PLASTIC LAMINATE

PKT POCKET (DOOR)

BP BY-PASS (DOOR)

CSMT CASEMENT WINDOW

ME MECHANICAL ENGINEER

NTS NOT TO SCALE

NEC NATIONAL ELECTRICAL
CODE
o/ OVER

REC RECESSED

PWDR POWDER ROOM

CLOS CLOSET
1 GAUGE

GLASS BLOCK

HOSE BIBB

HOLLOW CORE
HEADER
GYPSUM

HORIZONTAL

HARDWOOD

HARDWARE
HEIGHT

INTERIOR

INSULATE

INCLUDE (ED) (ING)

AIR CONDITIONING

HEATING/VENTING/

GALVANIZED IRON

GLASS, GLAZING

GENERAL CONTRACTOR

GALVANIZED
FOOT

FEILD VERIFY

FACE OF STUD

FURRED (ING)

FOUNDATION

FLUORESCENT

FIXED WINDOW

FOOTING
FLOOR
FOS
FND
FLUOR
FUR
FTG
FV
FX
FT
FLR
GYP
INSUL
INT
INCL
INCH
HORIZ
HDWD
HVAC
HR
HDR
HDW
HC
HB
HOUR
GL BLK
GALV
GI
GC
GL
GA

WATER PROOFING

WATER CLOSET

WATER HEATER

WATER RESISTANT

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED

WELDED WIRE FABRIC

GARAGE OPTIONS

GYPSUM BOARD
WEIGHT
GAR
WWF
WT

TYPICAL
WITH

WITHOUT
WINDOW
WRGB
w/o
WP
WH
WIN
TYP
UON
WD
WC

SQUARE YARD

SHELF AND POLE

SPECIFICATION

TOP OF BEAM

TOP OF PLATE

TOP OF SLAB

THICK (NESS)

TONGUE AND GROOVE

STRUCTURAL

TOP PLATE

THRESHOLD

TEMPERED
SYSTEM
T&G
TOP
TOS
THRES
TP
THK
STRUCT
TOB
TEMP
SYS
SY
SQUARE

SIMILAR
STEEL

STANDARD

SPEAKER
SPEC
STD
SPKR
SQ
STL
S&P
SIM
HT
IN
WT

TRANS TRANSOM

FL FLOOR LEVELNESS

THERMOPLASTIC POLYOLEFIN
TPO

FR FRENCH DOOR

SLDR SLIDING (DOOR OR WINDOW)

IRC INTERNATIONAL WI WROUGHT IRON

RESIDENTIAL CODE

IECC INTERNATIONAL

ENERGY CONSERVATION
CODE

TRK TRACK

SHW SHOWER
FINISH

FINISH GRADE

FLOOR JOIST

FLOOR DRAIN

EXISTING

EXHAUST

EXTERIOR

FORCED AIR UNIT
EXT
EXSTG
EXH
FJ
FG
FIN
FD
FAU

SOLID CORE

ROUGH OPENING

REINFORCE (D) (ING)

SINGLE HUNG WINDOW
SC
SHEET

SHTG SHEATING
SH
SHT
ROOM

REFERENCE
REINF
RO
RM
REF

SA SUPPLY AIR

FF FINISH FLOOR (FLATNESS)

F FIXED (DOOR OR WINDOW)

SE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER

EW EACH WAY RECP RECEPTACLE

B C D A
C
B
C
D
C

A B C D C B
B
A

D C B A D C

A B C D A B

D C B A D C B
A B
D C
C B A
D A
C 1.0 TENTATIVE MAP
C 2.0 EASEMENTS MAP
C 3.0 UTILITY PLAN
C 4.0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE
C 5.0 DETAILS
C 6.0 DETAILS
CIVIL:

ARCHITECTURAL
LANDSCAPE:

L 1.0 PLANTING PLAN
L 2.0 PLANTING PLAN
L 3.0 PLANTING PLAN
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
N 39° 25' 48" W

18.89'
N 39° 26' 03" E

18.89' N 00° 00' 08" E 117.50'
N 00° 00' 08" E 117.50'
N 01° 40' 47" W 208.07'N 01° 40' 47" W 208.07'
C1 C3
C6 C4
N 90° 00' 00" W 579.91' N 90° 00' 00" W 324.26'
N 00° 00' 30" W 353.98'
N 00° 00' 47" W 357.71'
N 90° 00' 00" W 598.18' N 89° 59' 34" W 221.02' N 90° 00' 00" E

36.41'
C7 C8
C/L WEST 5TH STREET

DUNKIRK DRIVE

BUS SHELTER
C/L WEST 5TH STREET

DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY
UNIT 1
UNIT 2
UNIT 3
UNIT 4
UNIT 5
UNIT 6
UNIT 7
UNIT 8
UNIT 9
UNIT 23
UNIT 10 UNIT 11 UNIT 12 UNIT 13 UNIT 14 UNIT 15 UNIT 16 UNIT 17 UNIT 18 UNIT 19 UNIT 20 UNIT 21 UNIT 22 UNIT 24 UNIT 25 UNIT 26 UNIT 27 UNIT 28 UNIT 29 UNIT 30 UNIT 31 UNIT 32 UNIT 33 UNIT 34 UNIT 46 UNIT 45 UNIT 44 UNIT 43 UNIT 42 UNIT 41 UNIT 40 UNIT 39 UNIT 38 UNIT 37 UNIT 36 UNIT 35 UNIT 47 UNIT 48 UNIT 49 UNIT 50 UNIT 51 UNIT 52 UNIT 53 UNIT 54 UNIT 55 UNIT 56 UNIT 57 UNIT 58 UNIT 59 UNIT 60 UNIT 61 UNIT 62 UNIT 63 UNIT 64 UNIT 65 UNIT 66 UNIT 67
UNIT 68
UNIT 69
UNIT 70
UNIT 71
UNIT 72
UNIT 73
UNIT 74
UNIT 75
UNIT 76
UNIT 82 UNIT 81 UNIT 80 UNIT 79 UNIT 78 UNIT 77
UNIT 83 UNIT 84 UNIT 85 UNIT 86
UNIT 90 UNIT 89 UNIT 88 UNIT 87

COMMON AREA
LOT A

COMMON AREA

COMMON AREA LOT B
LOT B

COMMON AREA

LOT B COMMON AREA
LOT B

COMMON AREA

LOT A COMMON AREA
LOT A

COMMON AREA
LOT A
15' PROPOSED PUBLIC WATERLINE EASEMENT


COMMON AREA
LOT D

COMMON AREA
LOT E

COMMON AREA
LOT F

COMMON AREA
LOT C
15' PROPOSED PUBLIC WATERLINE EASEMENT
15' PROPOSED PUBLIC WATERLINE EASEMENT
15' PROPOSED PUBLIC WATERLINE EASEMENT
15' PROPOSED PUBLIC WATERLINE EASEMENT
15' PROPOSED PUBLIC WATERLINE EASEMENT

PROPOSED CITY ACCESS EASEMENT OVER STREETS

PROPOSED CITY ACCESS EASEMENT OVER STREETS

PROPOSED CITY ACCESS EASEMENT OVER STREETS

PROPOSED CITY ACCESS EASEMENT OVER STREETS
HUMP
HUMP
8"W 8"W 8"W
8"W
8"W
8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W
8"W
8"W
&/,(17
6+((77,7/(
32572),123/$&(
72:1+20(6
32572),123/
:(677+675((7
2;1$5'&$/,)251,$
352-(&77,7/(
6+((7180%(5

'5$:1&+.%<

-2%12

'$7(

'(/7$ 5(9,6,21
0753
'$7(

(916) 731-8088 office (916) 731-8089 fax
Sacramento, CA. 95816 1700 Alhambra Blvd., Suite 102
Peabody Engineering
1 TENTATIVE

CONDOMINIUM
MAP
7(17$7,9(&21'20,1,800$3)25&21'20,1,80385326(6
SCALE: 1"= 30'

PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE AND

UNIT LINE

EASEMENT LINE
/(*(1'

CURVE DELTA RADIUS
C1 01°40'55" 331.00'
C3 01°40'55" 269.00'
C4 01°40'55" 269.00'
C6 01°40'55" 331.00'
C7 16°16'07" 27.00'
C8 41°00'29" 93.00'
CURVE DATA:

GROSS AREA: 9.164 ± AC.

LAND USE DATA:

NET AREA: 7.39 ± AC.

PAVED AREA: 82,085± S.F.

EXISTING USE:

VACANT WITH NO IMPROVEMENTS
PROPOSED USE:

EXISTING ZONE:

RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM

BUSINESS & RESEARCH PARK (BRP)
PROPOSED ZONE:

MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL(R-2)
SITE
9,&,1,7<0$3
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

CONDOMINIUM PLAN SHALL CREATE INDIVIDUAL UNITS AND COMMON AREA LOTS TO BE OWNED BY THE ASSOCIATION. EACH UNIT SHALL ENCOMPASS A BUILDING UNIT AND LAND AREA AROUND THE UNIT AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP. THE COMMON AREA LOTS ARE

CREATED FOR THE COMMON AREA SPACE AROUND THE UNITS, EACH WITH SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTS AS FOLLOWS:

CONDOMINIUM PLAN INTENT:

COMMON AREA LOT A:

COMMON AREA LOT IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN COMMON AREA LOT

ALL THE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED SEWER

AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG WITH THE

PRIVATE ROADS, SIDEWALKS, SITE LIGHTS, PARKING

AREAS, LANDSCAPING, FENCING, WALLS, GATES,
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS, AND POOL.

COMMON AREA LOT B: ALL THE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED SEWER

AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG WITH THE

PRIVATE ROADS, SIDEWALKS, SITE LIGHTS, PARKING

AREAS, LANDSCAPING, FENCING, WALLS, GATES, AND
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS.

COMMON AREA LOT C: PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED LANDSCAPING, FENCING, WALLS, AND GATES FRONTING WEST 5TH
STREET.

COMMON AREA LOT D: PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED LANDSCAPING, FENCING, WALLS, AND GATES FRONTING WEST 5TH
STREET AND PORTOFINO PLACE.

COMMON AREA LOT E: PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED LANDSCAPING, FENCING, WALLS, AND GATES FRONTING WEST 5TH
STREET AND PORTOFINO PLACE.

COMMON AREA LOT F: PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED LANDSCAPING, FENCING, WALLS, AND GATES FRONTING WEST 5TH
STREET.

UNITS 1 - 90:

COMMON UNIT IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED WITH TYPICAL UNIT

EACH UNIT WILL INCLUDE THE BUILDING STRUCTURE

COMPLETELY, THE YARD AREA WITHIN THE FENCE AND

WALL LINES, AND THE DRIVEWAYS INCLUDING
LANDSCAPING TO THE BACK OF SIDEWALK OR CURB.

TYPICAL UNIT LAYOUT

BACK OF SIDEWALK OR CURB

DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY

PRIVATE YARD PRIVATE YARD

BUILDING BUILDING FENCE
FENCE
FENCE
NOTES:

TYPICAL UNIT DIMENSIONS: 31' X 65'
TYPICAL UNIT HEIGHT: 40 FEET FROM UNIT FINISHED
FLOOR TO TOP OF UNIT AIRSPACE.

UTILITIES: EACH UNIT WILL HAVE

SEPARATE UTILITY HOOKUPS
FROM THE PRIVATE STREET.

TWO LOT CONDOMINIUM MAP
LOT DATA:

LOT 1 NET AREA: 4.67 ± AC.

LOT 2 NET AREA: 2.72 ± AC.

LOT 1 SUMMARY:
60 UNITS - RESIDENTIAL CONDO
LOT 2 SUMMARY:
30 UNITS - RESIDENTIAL CONDO
)7
2)7+(($57+
727+(&(17(5 727+(&(17(5
2)7+(($57+
+25,=217$//,0,76
+25,=217$//,0,76

TYPICAL VERTICAL CROSS SECTION

TYPICAL AIR SPACE PLAN
,1727+(+($9(16
,1),1,7(/<83:$5'6 ,1727+(+($9(16
,1),1,7(/<83:$5'6
81,76 6((3/$1
',0(16,219$5,(6

UNIT AREA
)/225 81,7),1,6+('

OF CONDOMINIUM UNITS

ISCHIA STREET

JOPPOLO STREET

RAPALLO STREET

IMPERIA STREET

JESOLO STREET

OSTIA STREET
LOT NO. 1 LOT NO. 2
(NTS)

PRIVATE ROAD TYPICAL STREET SECTION
26'
2'
CG
11'-6"

TRAVEL LANE
11'-6"

TRAVEL LANE
C/L
2'
CG
5'
CITY STD. CURB & GUTTER
PER PLATE 111 SIDEWALK 2% 2%
(TO BE ABANDONED)
6 OF
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6064
LOTS 1 & 2
FOR

CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES

PORTOFINO PLACE TOWNHOMES
APN'S 185-0-221-025, 185-0-221-265, & 185-0-223-015
(TO BE ABANDONED)
10FT. LANDSCAPE EASEMENT PER
DOC. NO. 87408
10FT. LANDSCAPE EASEMENT PER
DOC. NO. 87408 (TO BE ABANDONED)
ORIGINAL 40FT. ROADWAY DEDICATION
PER 8 MR 1
10FT. RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION PER 159 OR 213

WATER LINE EASEMENT DEDICATION
PER BK. 1774 OR 565 & BK. 2330 OR 532
46FT. RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION
PER BK. 2712 OR 590, 2712 OR 592, 2712 OR 598,
AND 2736 OR 170
46FT. RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION
PER BK. 2712 OR 590, 2712 OR 592, 2712 OR 598,
AND 2736 OR 170

PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER
DOC. NO. 87409 & 101573 OR
PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 87409 & 101573 OR

COMMON AREA
LOT A

COMMON AREA
LOT A

COMMON AREA

LOT A COMMON AREA

LOT A COMMON AREA
LOT B

COMMON AREA
LOT B

COMMON AREA
LOT B
10FT. PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT

PROPOSED AT BACK OF UNITS
12/01/21
370
N 39° 25' 48" W

18.89'
N 39° 26' 03" E

18.89' N 00° 00' 08" E 117.50'
N 00° 00' 08" E 117.50'
N 01° 40' 47" W 208.07'N 01° 40' 47" W 208.07'
C1 C3
C6 C4
N 90° 00' 00" W 579.91' N 90° 00' 00" W 324.26'
N 00° 00' 30" W 353.98'
N 00° 00' 47" W 357.71'
N 90° 00' 00" W 598.18' N 89° 59' 34" W 221.02' N 90° 00' 00" E

36.41'
C7 C8
C/L WEST 5TH STREET

DUNKIRK DRIVE

BUS SHELTER
C/L WEST 5TH STREET

DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY
15' PROPOSED PUBLIC WATERLINE EASEMENT


15' PROPOSED PUBLIC WATERLINE EASEMENT
15' PROPOSED PUBLIC WATERLINE EASEMENT
15' PROPOSED PUBLIC WATERLINE EASEMENT
15' PROPOSED PUBLIC WATERLINE EASEMENT
15' PROPOSED PUBLIC WATERLINE EASEMENT

PROPOSED CITY ACCESS EASEMENT OVER STREETS

PROPOSED CITY ACCESS EASEMENT OVER STREETS

PROPOSED CITY ACCESS EASEMENT OVER STREETS

PROPOSED CITY ACCESS EASEMENT OVER STREETS
HUMP
HUMP
8"W 8"W 8"W
8"W
8"W
8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W
8"W
8"W
2 TENTATIVE

CONDOMINIUM
MAP
352326('($6(0(17(;+,%,7
SCALE: 1"= 30'
LOT NO. 1 LOT NO. 2

EXISTING EASEMENTS EXHIBIT
(TO BE ABANDONED) (TO BE ABANDONED) (TO BE ABANDONED)
LOT NO. 1
LOT NO. 2
6 OF
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6064
LOTS 1 & 2
FOR

CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES

PORTOFINO PLACE TOWNHOMES
APN'S 185-0-221-025, 185-0-221-265, & 185-0-223-015
&/,(17
6+((77,7/(
32572),123/$&(
72:1+20(6
32572),123/
:(677+675((7
2;1$5'&$/,)251,$
352-(&77,7/(
6+((7180%(5

'5$:1&+.%<

-2%12

'$7(

'(/7$ 5(9,6,21
0753
'$7(

(916) 731-8088 office (916) 731-8089 fax
Sacramento, CA. 95816 1700 Alhambra Blvd., Suite 102
Peabody Engineering
EXISTING EASEMENT CALLOUTS & DESCRIPTIONS:

PROPOSED EASEMENTS EXHIBIT
(TO BE ABANDONED) (TO BE ABANDONED)
(TO BE ABANDONED)
10' PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
12/01/21
371
&/,(17
6+((77,7/(
32572),123/$&(
72:1+20(6
32572),123/
:(677+675((7
2;1$5'&$/,)251,$
352-(&77,7/(
6+((7180%(5

'5$:1&+.%<

-2%12

'$7(

'(/7$ 5(9,6,21
0753
'$7(

(916) 731-8088 office (916) 731-8089 fax
Sacramento, CA. 95816 1700 Alhambra Blvd., Suite 102
Peabody Engineering
3 UTILITY PLAN
6(:(5/,1(:6(59,&(
6(:(50$1+2/(
:$7(5/,1(
:$7(59$/9(
),5(+<'5$17$66(0%/<
53%$&.)/2:35(9(17(5
6"SS
8"W
352326(' (;,67,1*
67250'5$,1
'5$,1,1/(7
/80,1$,5(
67250'5$,10$1+2/(
&(17(5/,1(
3523(57</,1(
($6(0(17/,1(
5,*+72):$</,1(
6,*1
6'
12"D 12"D
8"SS
87,/,7<3/$1 SCALE: 1"= 30'
8"W
:$7(56(59,&( 0(7(5%2;
10FT. LANDSCAPE EASEMENT 10FT. LANDSCAPE EASEMENT

FDC & FIRE
RISER
PRIVATE SEWER LINE TYP.

PUBLIC WATER MAIN IN 15FT.

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT TYP.

PRIVATE SEWER LINE TYP. PRIVATE SEWER LINE TYP.

PRIVATE SEWER LINE TYP.

PUBLIC WATER MAIN IN 15FT.

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT TYP.

PUBLIC WATER MAIN IN 15FT.

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT TYP.

PUBLIC WATER MAIN IN 15FT.

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT TYP.

POND BOTTOM
6 OF
NOTE: PROPOSED FIBER

NETWORK EXTENSION
ALONG WEST 5TH STREET
NOTE: PROPOSED FIBER

NETWORK EXTENSION
ALONG WEST 5TH STREET
12/01/21
N 39° 25' 48" W

18.89'
N 39° 26' 03" E

18.89' N 00° 00' 08" E 117.50'
N 00° 00' 08" E 117.50'
N 01° 40' 47" W 208.07'N 01° 40' 47" W 208.07'
C1 C3
C6 C4
N 90° 00' 00" W 579.91' N 90° 00' 00" W 324.26'
N 00° 00' 30" W 353.98'
N 00° 00' 47" W 357.71'
N 90° 00' 00" W 598.18' N 89° 59' 34" W 221.02' N 90° 00' 00" E

36.41'
C7 C8
'
'
'
'
66
66
66
66 66 8"W 8"W 8"W

B-LH A A-RH B-LH
B-RH
A
B
A
C/L WEST 5TH STREET

DUNKIRK DRIVE

B A-LH B A B A B
A
B-LH

B-RH A-LH

A-LH B A B A

B-RH B A B A B A-LH

B-RH A-LH

A-LH B-RH
B-RH
POOL

BUS SHELTER
C/L WEST 5TH STREET
A
REC.

B ROOM

DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY
B-RH

B A B A


PLAYGROUND
B A-LH
HUMP
HUMP
66
66
66
66 66
66
66 66
66
66
66
66
8"W 8"W 8"W
8"W
8"W
8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W
8"W
8"W
66
'
'
'
' '
'
'
'
'
'
'

'
' '

'

'
372
N 39° 25' 48" W

18.89'
N 39° 26' 03" E

18.89' N 00° 00' 08" E 117.50'
N 00° 00' 08" E 117.50'
N 01° 40' 47" W 208.07'N 01° 40' 47" W 208.07'
C1 C3
C6 C4
N 90° 00' 00" W 579.91' N 90° 00' 00" W 324.26'
N 00° 00' 30" W 353.98'
N 00° 00' 47" W 357.71'
N 90° 00' 00" W 598.18' N 89° 59' 34" W 221.02' N 90° 00' 00" E

36.41'
C7 C8
'
'
'
'
66
66
66
66 66 8"W 8"W 8"W

B-LH A A-RH B-LH
B-RH
A
B
A
C/L WEST 5TH STREET

DUNKIRK DRIVE

B A-LH B A B A B
A
B-LH

B-RH A-LH

A-LH B A B A

B-RH B A B A B A-LH

B-RH A-LH

A-LH B-RH
B-RH
POOL

BUS SHELTER
C/L WEST 5TH STREET
A
REC.

B ROOM

DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY
B-RH

B A B A


PLAYGROUND
B A-LH
HUMP
HUMP
8"W 8"W 8"W
8"W
8"W
8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W
8"W
8"W
'
'
'
' '
'
R R
R R R
R
FF= 32.20 FF= 32.20
FF= 32.20
FF= 32.30
FF= 32.20
FF= 32.20
FF= 32.20
FF= 32.20 FF= 32.40 FF= 32.60 FF= 32.60 FF= 32.40
FF= 32.20 FF= 32.40 FF= 32.60 FF= 32.60 FF= 32.40 FF= 32.20 FF= 32.20 FF= 32.40
FF= 32.20 FF= 32.40 FF= 32.60 FF= 32.60 FF= 32.40 FF= 32.20 FF= 32.00 FF= 32.40 FF= 32.60 FF= 32.60

30.93 30.85

31.69 31.02

31.69 31.02

31.02 31.02

31.02 31.02 30.93

31.69 30.85

31.69 31.41

31.41 30.97 30.47

30.47 30.97

0.5%

0.5%

0.35%

31.14 31.14

0.5%

0.5%

0.5% 0.5%

0.5% 0.5% 0.5%
R
R R
R R
R

31.48 31.48

30.93 30.93

31.10 31.10

31.10 31.10

30.94 31.10

31.10 31.10

31.38 31.38

31.38 31.48

31.48 FF= 32.60
FF= 32.50 FF= 32.50
FF= 32.50 FF= 32.50
FF= 32.10 FF= 32.30 FF= 32.30
FF= 32.20
FF= 32.20
FF= 32.30
FF= 32.20
FF= 32.20
FF= 32.30 FF= 32.50 FF= 32.30 0.5% 0.5%

0.5% 0.5%

0.5% 0.5%

0.5% 0.5% 30.91

0.5%

31.4931.49

0.35%

31.14 31.14
'

FILTERRA

BIORETENTION
SYSTEM
FBSVIB1808
12" OF

PONDING

FILTERRA

BIORETENTION
SYSTEM
FBSVIB1808
12" OF

PONDING

FILTERRA

BIORETENTION
SYSTEM
FBSVIB1808
12" OF

PONDING
FL= 30.40
FL= 30.50

OVERLAND

RELEASE

OVERLAND

RELEASE

OVERLAND

RELEASE
FL= 31.25
FL= 31.14
FL= 31.25
FL= 31.14
FL= 31.50
FL= 31.40
RIM= 31.26
FL= 29.07
RIM= 31.30
FL= 29.48
RIM= 31.45
FL= 29.82
RIM= 31.28
FL= 29.48
FL= 29.25
RIM= 31.20
FL= 29.36
FL= 29.25
RIM= 31.28
FL= 29.69
RIM= 31.33
FL= 28.93
FL= 28.50 RIM= 31.32
FL= 28.60
'
'
'
FL= 29.00
'
FL= 28.00

'
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5
' '
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3
1 2
1 2 3
1 2 3 4 1
1 2 1

'

'
&/,(17
6+((77,7/(
32572),123/$&(
72:1+20(6
32572),123/
:(677+675((7
2;1$5'&$/,)251,$
352-(&77,7/(
6+((7180%(5

'5$:1&+.%<

-2%12

'$7(

'(/7$ 5(9,6,21
0753
'$7(

(916) 731-8088 office (916) 731-8089 fax
Sacramento, CA. 95816 1700 Alhambra Blvd., Suite 102
Peabody Engineering

PRELIMINARY

GRADING &

DRAINAGE
PLAN
*5$',1* '5$,1$*(3/$1 SCALE: 1"= 30'

PROPOSED DETENTION BASIN

PROPOSED CURB&GUTTER
PER CITY PLATE 111
12" D EXISTING DRAIN LINE

PROPOSED SIDEWALK
/(*(1'

PROPOSED GUTTER

FLOWLINE GRADE

NEW DRAIN INLET ON

NEW DRAIN LINE
12" D

31.48 0.5%
R

PROPOSED STREET

GUTTER SLOPE

PROPOSED GRADING
RIDGE

PROPOSED UNIT

FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION
FF= 32.60

PROPOSED PRIVATE

STREET ASPHALT
(NTS)

PRIVATE ROAD TYPICAL STREET SECTION
26'
2'
CG
11'-6"

TRAVEL LANE
11'-6"

TRAVEL LANE
C/L
2'
CG
4'
CITY STD. CURB & GUTTER
PER PLATE 111
B
B
B
A A
B A
A
A A
C
C
C
C

CURVE DELTA RADIUS
C1 01°40'55" 331.00'
C3 01°40'55" 269.00'
C4 01°40'55" 269.00'
C6 01°40'55" 331.00'
C7 16°16'07" 27.00'
C8 41°00'29" 93.00'
CURVE DATA:

EARTHWORK DATA:

GROSS AREA: 9.164 ± AC.

SITE DATA:

NET AREA: 7.39 ± AC.

CUT: 9,950 C.Y.

FILL: 8,750 C.Y.

NET: 1,200 C.Y
SHRINKAGE: 12%

BASIN DETENTION VOLUME (REQUIRED) VOLUME (PROVIDED)
1 2,913 C.F. 3,130 C.F.
2 3,386 C.F. 3,444 C.F.
3 3,296 C.F. 3,320 C.F.

DETENTION BASIN DATA:

EXISTING
STORM
DRAIN

EXISTING
STORM
DRAIN
PAVED AREA: 82,085± S.F.

LANDSCAPE AREA: 40.960 ± S.F.
2% 2%
13' 13'

SIDEWALK

DETENTION REQUIREMENTS PER SHED
C
C
C
C

BUS STOP -

NO PARKING
SIGN
N.T.S.

PROPOSED RETENTION POND

BUS STOP -

NO PARKING
SIGN

SOLAR LED

SHELTER
LIGHT
4 6 OF

TENTATIVE

CONDOMINIUM
MAP

NO STOPPING

ANY TIME
SIGN TYP.

SPEED HUMP

NO STOPPING

ANY TIME
SIGN TYP.
12/01/21
373
&/,(17
6+((77,7/(
32572),123/$&(
72:1+20(6
32572),123/
:(677+675((7
2;1$5'&$/,)251,$
352-(&77,7/(
6+((7180%(5

'5$:1&+.%<

-2%12

'$7(

'(/7$ 5(9,6,21
0753
'$7(

(916) 731-8088 office (916) 731-8089 fax
Sacramento, CA. 95816 1700 Alhambra Blvd., Suite 102
Peabody Engineering

TENTATIVE

CONDOMINIUM
MAP

PROPOSED DETENTION BASIN

PROPOSED CURB&GUTTER
PER CITY PLATE 111
12" D EXISTING DRAIN LINE

PROPOSED SIDEWALK
/(*(1'

PROPOSED GUTTER

FLOWLINE GRADE

NEW DRAIN INLET ON

NEW DRAIN LINE
12" D

31.48 0.5%
R

PROPOSED STREET

GUTTER SLOPE

PROPOSED GRADING
RIDGE

PROPOSED UNIT

FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION
FF= 32.60

PROPOSED PRIVATE

STREET ASPHALT
FILTERA STORMWATER SYSTEM DETAIL N.T.S.

DETENTION
VOLUME

ELEVATION

FILTERA

STORMWATER

TREATMENT
SYSTEM

DETENTION & INFILTRATION PIPE SYSTEM CROSS-SECTION &
12" INFLOW DRAIN
12" OUTFLOW DRAIN

OUTFALL

STRUCTURE
SCALE: 1" = 10'
2" 18" 18"
81'(5*5281'3,3(%$6,1%'(7$,/
81'(5*5281'3,3(%$6,1$'(7$,/
6" SUBDRAIN TO
GRAVEL TRENCH SUBDRAIN 2FT.

GRAVEL TRENCH
12"x12" DRAIN INLET AT

PERFORATED PIPE END
WITH RIM SET TO 3" ABOVE
LANDSCAPING AREA.
5 6 OF

PRELIMINARY
BASIN

DETAILED

GRADING
PLANS

INFILTRATION
VOLUME

ELEVATION
8'
74'
30"Ø RISER
ELEVATION VIEW RIGHT VIEW 7'

LEFT VIEW
30"Ø RISER

ELEVATION VIEW LEFT VIEW
30"Ø RISER

ELEVATION VIEW
8'
77'
30"Ø RISER

ELEVATION VIEW

RIGHT VIEW

UNDERGROUND PIPE BASIN WITH

PERFORATED BOTTOM FOR INFILTRATION -

INFILTRATION VOLUME AND DETENTION

VOLUME ARE COMBINED FOR TOTAL VOLUME
374
&/,(17
6+((77,7/(
32572),123/$&(
72:1+20(6
32572),123/
:(677+675((7
2;1$5'&$/,)251,$
352-(&77,7/(
6+((7180%(5

'5$:1&+.%<

-2%12

'$7(

'(/7$ 5(9,6,21
0753
'$7(

(916) 731-8088 office (916) 731-8089 fax
Sacramento, CA. 95816 1700 Alhambra Blvd., Suite 102
Peabody Engineering

TENTATIVE

CONDOMINIUM
MAP
SCALE: 1" = 10'

PRELIMINARY

FILTERRA

TREATMENT

SIZING &
DETAILS 6
6 OF
375
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 1.0 SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA

COMMON AREA LOT
E

COMMON AREA LOT
F

COMMON AREA LOT

A COMMON AREA LOT
A
NORTH
C/L WEST 5TH STREET

C/L PORTOFINO PLACE
POOL

BUS SHELTER
C/L WEST 5TH STREET

DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY
8'

POOL BATH

COMMUNITY
CENTER

DUNKIRK DRIVE

PLAYAREA

COMMON AREA LOT
A

COMMON AREA LOT
C

COMMON AREA LOT
D

COMMON AREA LOT
A

COMMON AREA LOT
B

COMMON AREA LOT
B
1 1 1 1 1
1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2 2
2 3
3 3
3 3 3
3 3
3 3
3 4 4
4 4 4
4 4
4 4
4 2 3
4 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5 5
5 5 5
5 5
5 5
5 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1
5 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 N 90*00'00" W 579.91'
12 12
12 12
12 12
12 12
12 11
11 11 11
11 11
11 11
11 11 11 11 11
11 11
14 14
14 14
14 14
14 14
14 14
14 14
14 14
14 14
14 14
7 14
14 14
14 15
15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
15 15
15 15
15 15
15 15
15 15
15 15
15 15
16 16
16 16
16 16
17 17
8 8
8 8
8 14
7 18 18
18 18
18 18 18
18 18
18 18 18
18 18
18 18
18 18
18 18
18 18
18 19
21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21
21 21
21 21
21 21
21 21
21 21
21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21
21 21
21 21
21 20
20 1
1 1
1 1 1
13 13
13 8
14 14 14 14 14 14 14
14 14 14 14 14 14
14 14 14 14 14 14 14
14 14
14 14
14 14 14 14 14 14
14 14 14
14 14
14 14
14 14
14 14
14 14
14 14 14

DOG PARK DOG PARK

REC AREA

REC AREA REC AREA

BUS SHELTER
1 6' HIGH SLUMPSTONE WALL WITH CAP
2 SALSBURY CLUSTER (MAIL) BOX 10A USPS APPROVED
3 TRANSFORMER
4 FIRE HYDRANT, 4" X 4-1/2" X 2-1/2" JONES J-4065
5 CREE LIGHTING RSW SERIES-2LG/LED
1800 SF OFFICE & 200 SF POOL BATHS
7 5 LOOP WAVE STYLE BIKE RACK, 2 EACH, U-LINE H-2544GALV 6 8 WROUGHT IRON PEDESTRIAN ACCESS GATE WITH PUSH
9 10
11 12

ASPHALT RIGHT OF WAY

PAVESTONE PANORAMA SERIES TAVERNA PAVERS
13 6' WROUGHT IRON FENCE
14 BROOM FINISHED CONCRETE AT ALL SIDEWALKS,
15 BROOM FINISHED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY TYPICAL

KEYNOTES
16 CLICK-2-ENTER ELECTRIC ENTRY GATES WITH KNOX SWITCH
17 ELECTRIC AUTOMATIC EXIT GATES
18 NO PARKING SIGN EVERY 100' IN TRAFFIC PATTERN
19 PROPOSED DUPLEX UNIT 25"

KEYNOTES
A 120 LITER CART, 37" X 19" X 21"
B
B
B
C
B 60" SLUMPSTONE WALL
C 60" PORCH ENTRY GATE

D CONCRETE WALK
D
D
D

E CONCRETE DRIVEWAY

F WATER METER

G GAS METER

H ELECTRICAL METER
H
G
F

I CURB AND GUTTER
I
E
E
20 BACKFLOW PREVENTORS
13'-8"
D
21 AIR CONDITION UNITS TYPICAL
A
A
A
25" 25"
6'-0"

TYPICAL UNIT UTLIITES SITE PLAN
BUTTON COMBO ACCESS. 36" x 60" WITH VERT. PICKETS
AT 4" OC. PAINTED KELLY MOORE PASO VERDE

WALKWAYS AND AT ALL GARBAGE/RECYLE LOUNGES
22 ALL FOUNDATIONS AND BUILDING SLABS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH VAPOR BARRIERS BETWEEN THE EXISTING SOIL AND NEW FOUNDATION AND BUILDING SLABS. (TYP.) 23 EACH DWELLING UNIT SHALL MAINTAIN SEPARATE UTILITY SYSTEMS AND METERS 24 HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION SHALL MAINTAIN ROADS, RECREATIONAL AREAS, AND LANDSCAPING 25 WHERE FEASIBLE, INDIVIDUAL UNIT PLUMBING SHALL BE LOCATED. 26 DECORATIVE BOXES SHALL BE USED FOR ELECTRICAL BOXES, MAILBOXES, AND DIRECTORIES. 10 3
3 10 9
4 5
376
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 1.1 SITE OVERLAY SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA

F A D F
D
A
B
A
C/L WEST 5TH STREET

C/L PORTOFINO PLACE

E B A B A B
A
E
C F

E B A B A

C B A B A B E
D E
E D
C
POOL

BUS SHELTER
C/L WEST 5TH STREET
C
B

DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY
D

B A B A
8'

PLAYAREA
B E

POOL BATH

COMMUNITY
CENTER
51' 10'

DUNKIRK DRIVE
10' 51' 10' 10' 10'
10' 10' 10' 10' 10'
5' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 51'
10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 51' 51' 10' 51' 10' 51' 10'
10' 10' 51' 5'
10' 51' 10' 51' 10' 51' 10' 51' 10' 51'
51' 51' 51'
51' 51' 51' 51' 51'
51' 51' 51' 51' 51' 51'
51' 51' 51' 51' 51' 51' 51'
51' 10' 51'
20' 26'
5' 51' 5'
5'
5' 5'
20' 26'
20' 26'
26' 20' 20' 5'26' 20' 20' 5'26' 20' 20' 5'
26' 20' 20' 5'26' 20' 20' 5'26' 20' 20' 5'26' 20' 20' 5'26' 20' 20' 5' 26' 20' 20' 5'26' 20' 20' 5'
5'
5'
5'
5' 26' 20'
5' 26' 20'
5' 26' 20'
F
19'-6" 30' 60'
4' 5' 19' 26'
4' 5' 19' 26'
10'

0.0000
5'
19' 28' 19' 5'
16'
16'-3"
16'-3"
16'-3"
15'
15'
15'
15'
15'
15'
30' 9'-3"
30' 9'-3"30' 9'-3"
30' 9'-3"
30' 9'-3"
16'-3"
16'-3"
35'-6" TYPICAL 35'-6" TYPICAL 36'-6" TYPICAL 36'-6" TYPICAL 36'-6" TYPICAL 36'-6" TYPICAL 36'-6" TYPICAL 36'-6" TYPICAL 36'-6" TYPICAL 16' 16' 36'-6" TYPICAL 5'8' 9' TYPICAL 9' TYPICAL 5' 36' 36' 19'
9' 5'
UNIT 8
UNIT 7
UNIT 6
UNIT 5
UNIT 4
UNIT 3
UNIT 2
UNIT 1
UNIT 9 UNIT 10 UNIT 11 UNIT 12 UNIT 13 UNIT 14 UNIT 15 UNIT 16 UNIT 17 UNIT 18 UNIT 19 UNIT 20 UNIT 21 UNIT 22 UNIT 23 UNIT 24 UNIT 25 UNIT 26 UNIT 27 UNIT 28 UNIT 29 UNIT 30 UNIT 31 UNIT 32 UNIT 33 UNIT 34 UNIT 46 UNIT 45 UNIT 44 UNIT 43 UNIT 42 UNIT 41 UNIT 40 UNIT 39 UNIT 38 UNIT 37 UNIT 36 UNIT 35 UNIT 47 UNIT 48 UNIT 49 UNIT 50 UNIT 51 UNIT 52 UNIT 53 UNIT 54 UNIT 55 UNIT 56 UNIT 57 UNIT 58 UNIT 59 UNIT 60 UNIT 61 UNIT 62 UNIT 63 UNIT 64 UNIT 65 UNIT 66 UNIT 68 UNIT 67
UNIT 70
UNIT 69
UNIT 72
UNIT 71
UNIT 76
UNIT 75
UNIT 74
UNIT 73
UNIT 82 UNIT 81 UNIT 80 UNIT 79 UNIT 78 UNIT 77
UNIT 83 UNIT 84 UNIT 85 UNIT 86
UNIT 90 UNIT 89 UNIT 88 UNIT 87

DOG PARK DOG PARK

REC AREA REC AREA

REC AREA

PROGRAM SUMMARY
PARCEL 'A': 4.07 ACRES
PARCEL 'B': .81 ACRES
PARCEL 'C': 2.73 ACRES

LOT UNIT COUNT
58 32
90 177,289.2
35,283
118,918.8

7.61 ACRES 331,491.6 SF
SF
SF
SF

SITE DATA SQUARE FOOT DATA PER STRUCTURE
3BR
2BR
UNIT
3 BR/ 3 BA
2 BR/ 2 BA
PLAN
1060 (47,700)
997 (44,865)

SF LIVING
849
849

FOOTPRINT (SF)
38,205
38,205
TOTAL
1486
1423

TOTAL LIVING
155,708
149,258

TOTAL GROSS SF
76,410 307,246
433 (19,918)
GARAGE
433 (19,918)
416 (18,720)

FF LIVING
416 (18,720)
(66,620)
(63,685)
10 10

END CAP
(100)
(100)
1476
1413

TOTAL LIVING
(66,420)
(63,585)

SITE BUILDING COVERAGE
COMMUNITY CENTER: 1800

AMENITY STRUCTURES (SF)
2000
76,410
TOTAL
78,410 (23.56%)

PARKING
90 2.0 PER UNIT

GARAGE TOTAL SPACES
STANDARD 37
HANDICAP 7

GUEST (OFF STREET)
90 2.0 PER UNIT

GUEST (DRIVEWAY)
3BR
2BR
UNIT
3 BR/ 3 BA
2 BR/ 2 BA
PLAN
849
849

FOOTPRINT (SF)
38,205
38,205
TOTAL
76,410
2000

AMENITY STRUCTURES

LIVING UNITS
ALLOWED* *82,972 (25%)
PROPOSED TOTAL 44
4 EA 5 LOOP BIKE RACKS (TTL 20) *COUNTY OF VENTURA

DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS, OVERLAY

UNIT TYPE COUNT
A
B
UNIT
C
D
E
F
12 QUANTITY
13 4
5 7
4 TOTAL 45

SITE ACCESS
AUTOMOTIVE: 2 EAST, 2 WEST
PEDESTRIAN: 4 EAST, 4 WEST

MAIL CLUSTER BOX LOCATIONS
USPS STANDARD 16: 2 EAST, 4 WEST
REQUIRED: 90 PROVIDED:96
3BR/2BR

UNIT SIZE
45 QUANTITY
TOTAL 180 TOTAL 180

BICYCLE PARKING
1 RACK SPACES PER 33 AUTO SPACES
394/33=11 STALLS

PROVIDED
PER "CITY OF OXNARD BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN PLAN"

INTERIOR YARD SPACE
TOTAL LOT SIZE: 331,000 SQFT
TOTAL INT. YARD SPACE: 127,000 SQFT (38%)
POOL BATHROOMS: 200
(4.5 SPACES PER UNIT)
PROVIDED: 404

TOTAL SPACES
REQUIRED: 244
10 3
3 10 9
4 5
SQFT
2923
2923
2940
2940
2940
2940
377
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 1.2 SITE COLOR SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA

2. Accent & Trim – Sherwin Williams SW7767 – High Reflective White

3. Roofing – Eagle Roofing Bel Air Brown Gray Range

4. Composite Roof Alternative – Owens Corning – Oakridge Sand Castle

1. Siding & Garage – Kelly Moore Paseo Verde

COLOR SCHEME A

5. Stone – Coronado Honey Ledge Grey Quartz

7. Accent & Trim – Sherwin Williams SW7755 – High Reflective White

8. Roofing – Eagle Roofing Bel Air Brown Gray Range

9. Composite Roof Alternative – Owens Corning – Oakridge Driftwood

6. Stucco & Garage – Sherwin Williams – SW7015 Repose Gray

COLOR SCHEME B

10. Stone – Coronado Honey Ledge Grey Quartz

12. Accent & Trim – Sherwin Williams SW7014 – Elder White

13. Roofing – Eagle Roofing Topanga -4576

14. Composite Roof Alternative – Owens Corning – Oakridge Teak

11. Stucco & Garage – Sherwin Williams – SW7018 – Dovetail

COLOR SCHEME C

15. Stone – Coronado Honey Ledge Sioux Falls

17. Accent & Trim – Sherwin Williams SW8917 – Shell White

18. Roofing – Eagle Roofing Concord Blend - 4602

19. Composite Roof Alternative – Owens Corning – Gray

16. Sidding & Garage – Sherwin Williams – SW6422 – Shagreen

COLOR SCHEME D

20. Stone – Coronado Honey Ledge Sioux Falls
B
CD
ACBCD
C
ABCDCB
BA
D
C
B
A
D
C
A
BCDA
B

DCBADCB
AB
D
C
C
BA
A
D
NORTH
C/L WEST 5TH STREET

C/L PORTOFINO PLACE
C/L WEST 5TH STREET
8'

DUNKIRK DRIVE

EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE

REC AREA REC AREA

REC AREA

DOG PARK DOG PARK
10 33
10 9
4 5
378
w
B. Allow for erection loads, and for sufficient temporary bracing to maintain true alignment until ood structural panel with joints backed by 23/32 inch wood structural panel or one thickness of ¾ inch,

1.26 ADJUSTING
Uniform Fire Code (and Local Ordinances)
type 2
Fireblocks may also by of gypsum board material, mineral fiber, glass fiber or other approved materials securely fastened in place. Loose-fill insulation material shall not be used as a fire block specifically fire tested. Walls having parallel or staggered studs for sound transmission control shall have fire blocks of mineral fiber or glass fiber or other approved nonrigid materials.

PART 1

1.01 1.02
PART 2 PRODUCTS

2.01 2.02

2.03 2.04

2.05 LAMINATE MATERIALS

2.06 ACCESSORIES

2.07 HARDWARE

2.08 FABRICATION
PART 3

3.01 3.02
contact with concrete.

C.

D.

E.

F.

G.
– GENERAL
Structural wall framing.

Wall Sheathing
Roof Sheathing
Preservative treatment of wood.

Miscellaneous framing and sheathing.

Sono-tube
Perform Work in accord
and handle products.
- PRODU CTS

1.01 1.02

1.03 PART 1

SECTION INCLUDES
A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

F.

QUALITY ASSURANCE
A.

B.

C.

QUALIFICATIONS
A.

B.

PART 2
completion of erection and installation of permanent attachments.

Field weld components indicated on shop drawings.

Perform field welding in accordance with AWS D1.1
Obtain Architect/Engineer approval prior to site cutting or making adjustments not scheduled.

After erection, prime welds, abrasions, and surfaces not shop primed, except surfaces to be in Install ladders as indicated on drawings.

SECTION 06112

FRAMING AND SHEATHING
ance with the following agencies.

Lumber Grading Agency Certified by ALSC.

Plywood Grading Agency: Certified by APA.

Design structural site fabricated trusses under direct supervision of a Professional structural Engineer experienced in design of this Work and licensed in the State of Nevada, store, protect, Protect site framed structural site fabricates trusses from warping or other distortion by attacking in vertical position, braced to resist movement.

Lumber Grading Rules, WWFA.

Durability, sanded.

Durabil ity 1, sanded.

A. Fasteners and Anchors:

B.
steel elsewhere.

C.

D.

E.

Simpson.

F.

G. Building paper: No. 15 asphalt felt.

2.02 2.03

2.04 A.

B.

C.

D.

SHEATHING MATERIALS
A.

B.

C.

ACCESSORIES

FACTORY WOOD TRETMENT
A.

Framing Lumber, Douglas fir-Larch (North) No 2 Grade for 2x and 4x, and DFL No. 1 for 6x’s Studding: Douglas fir-larch species, stud grade, 19% maximum moisture content/ All blocking and bracing to be Douglas Fir Standard grade or better Plywood roof sheathing: APA Rated Sheathing Structural II, Span Rating 32/16, Exposure Plywood Wall Sheathing: APA Rated Sheathing Structural II, Span Rating 32/16, Exposure Particleboard Wall Sheathing: APA Oriented Strand Board.

Fasteners: Hot-dipped galvanized steel for high humidity and treated wood locations, unfinished Drywall Screws: Bugle head, hardened steel, power driven type.

Anchors: Expansion shield and lag bolt type for anchorage to solid masonry or concrete. Bolt or ballistic fastener for anchorages to steel.

Joist hangers: Hot dipped galvanized steel, sized to suit framing conditions, manufactured by Bolt holes shall be 1/16” maximum larger than bolt size.

Wood Preservative (Pressure Treatment): AWPA Treatment C1 using water borne.

2.01 LUMBER MATERIALS
Work:

1. Contract Dra wings.

2. Specifications.

3. Addenda.

4. 5.

Change orders and other Modifications to the Contract.

Reviewed shop drawings, product data, and samples.
progress.
-
including the following:

1. 2.
appurtenances

3. referenced to visible and

4. 5.

INSTUCTIONS” and title of project.

Contents:

Record information concurrent with construction
Manufacturer’s name and product model and number.

1. Measured depths of foundations in relation to finish first floor datum.

Measured horizontal and vertical locations of underground utilities and , reference to permanent surface improvements.
accessible features of the Work.

Field changes of dimension and detail.

Details not on original Contract Drawings,
Delete Architect/Engineer title block ad seal from all documents. ring capacity expansion binder with durable plastic covers.

Prepare binding cover with printed title “OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Internally subdivide the binder contents with permanent page dividers, logically organized, with tab titling clearly printed under reinforced laminated plastic tabs.

Store Record Documents separate from documents used for construction.

A.

1.27 A.

C.

D.

E.

F.

G.

1.28 A.

B.

C.

D.
- restore Work
B.

PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA

2. 3. Project documents and certificates.

Provide duplicate notarized copies.
specification sections.

FOR CASTMortar and grout.

MATERIALS
-
Subcontractors, and major equipment suppliers.

Operation and maintenance instructions, arranged by system.

Submit prior to final Application for Payment.

IN PLACE CONCRETE & REINFORCED UNIT MASONRY
(SEE STRUCTURAL NOTES & DRAWINGS)
150 and be as specified for concrete.
-

1.29 A.

B.

C.

1.30 A.

PART 1 –

1.01 A.

PART 2 –

2.01 A.

B.
tifications as appropriate.
when more
D.

2.02 A.

C.

WARRANTIES
SPARE PARTS AND MAINTENANCE MATERIALS.

GENERAL

SECTION INCLUDES

PRODUCTS
Portland Cement: ASTM C
Premix Mortar: ASTM
Grout Aggregate: ASTM C387, using gray cement, Normal strength.

Water: Clean and potable.

MORTAR MIXES
Method, 1800 psi at 28 days.

1. Directory, listing names, addresses, and telephone numbers of Contractor, pational Safety and Health Act
Regulations of the State Fire; Marshal
Life Safety Code
Occu
N
- completely seal voids.

A.

B.

1.03 A.

B.

C.

D.

1.04 1.05

1.06 1.07
A.

1.02 COORDINATIO
for accommodating items installed later.

CUTTING AND PATCHING
Employ experienced installer
with new Products.
elements.
construction +/
Finish surfaces to match adjacent finishes.

CONFERENCES (As required by Owner)
SHOP DRAWINGS (As required by Owner)

PRODUCT DATA
County Area, Nevada, latest edition.

1.08 A.

B.

1.09 A.

B.

1.10 A.

B.

1.11 A.

B.

C.

D.

SAMPLES
and patterns.

MANUFACTURERS’ INSTRUCTIONS
instructions
in quantities specified for Product Data.
supporting reference data, affidavits, and cer
MANUFACTURER’S CERTIFICATES
specified for Product Data.
supp

QUALITY ASSURANCE
clarification from Architect before proceeding.

E.

F.
precise workmanship.
quality.

B.

State of Nevada Industrial Commission Codes and Safety Orders State of Nevada, Regulations of the Division of Health
Materials, methods, and testing shall conform to Divisions ii and iii of the Uniform Standard ‘specification for Public Works Construction Off-Site Improvements. Clark Coordinate scheduling, submittals, and the various areas of Work to assure efficient and orderly sequence of installation of interdependent construction elements, with provisions Verify that utility requirement characteristics of operating equipment are compatible with building utilities. Coordinate work having interdependent responsibilities for installing, connecting to, and placing in service such equipment.
to perform cutting and patching new Work +/
Submit written request in advance of cutting or altering structural or building enclosure Fit Work tight to adjacent elements. Maintain integrity of wall, ceiling, or floor SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES (As required by Owner)
Submit the number of copies which the Owner requires.

Mark each copy to identify applicable products, models, options, and other data.

Supplement manufacturers’ standard data to provide information unique to this project.

Submit samples to illustrate functional and aesthetic characteristics of the Product.

Submit samples of finishes form the full range of manufacturer's standard colors textures, When specified in individual specification Sections submit manufacturers’ printed for delivery, storage, assembly, installation, start-up, adjusting, and finishing, Indicate material or Product conforms to or exceeds specified requirements. Submit Submit manufacturers’ certificates to Architect/engineer for review, ion quantities Indicate material or Product conforms to or exceeds specified requirements. Submit orting reference data, affidavits, and certifications as appropriate.

Monitor quality control over suppliers, manufacturer’s products, services, site conditions, and workmanship, to produce Work of specified quality.

Comply fully with manufacturers’ instructions, including each step in sequence.

Should manufacturers’ instructions conflict with Contract Documents, request Comply with specified standards as a minimum quality for the Work except stringent tolerances, codes, or specified requirements indicate higher standards or more Perform work by persons qualified and experienced to produce workmanship of specified Secure products in place with positive anchorage devices designed and sized to withstand stresses, vibration, physical distortion or disfigurement, and match surrounding finishes.

Adjust operating products and equipment to ensure smooth and unhindered operation.

Maintain on site, one set of the following record documents record actual revisions to the Specifications: Legibly mark and record at each Product section description of actual products installed, Measured location of internal utilities and appurtenances concealed In construction, Submit documents to Owner/Contractor with claim for final Application for Payment.

Submit tow sets prior to final inspection, bound in 81/2 x 11 inch text pages, three D size Execute and assemble documents from Subcontractors, suppliers, and manufacturers.

Provide Products, spare parts, maintenance and extra materials in quantities specified in individual Mortar for Reinforced masonry conforming to U.B.C. table 14A, Type S using the Property

3. B. Hardboard: PS 58 –
thick.

A. Formica
B. Wilsonart
C. Laminate Backing Sheet: LD -
A. Adhesive: MM -A-125, Type II
B.

C.

A. As selected by Owner.

A.
through building openings.

B.

C.

D.

E. Provi
Approved products: Kortron or Melamine

ACCEPTABLE LAMINATE MANUFACTURERS
3 BK20 Backing grade
Fasteners: Size and type to suit application.

Fabricate counter tops with integral splash.
-
edges.
– EXECUTION

INSPECTION
A.

INSTALLATION
A.

Verify adequacy of backing send support framing.

Set and secure casework in place rigid, plumb, and level fittings. Verify locations of cotouts from on -
pressed wood fiber with resin binder, tempered grade, smooth one side: ¼” A. Plastic laminate: NEMA LD 3, DLS grade thickness, color as selected by Owner. undecorated plastic laminate.

Bolts, Nuts, Washers, Lags, Pins and Screws of size and type to suit application.

Shop assemble casework for delivery to site in units easily handled and to permit passage Cap exposed plastic laminate edges with material of same finish and pattern.

Apply laminate backing sheet to reverse side of plastic laminate finished surfaces. de cutouts for plumbing fixtures, inserts, appliances, outlet boxes and other fixtures and site dimensions. Seal contact surfaces of cut
Use purpose designed fixture attachments at concealed locations for wallmounted components.

2. Use particleboard in face edgings, in base or framing members or in shelves or panels. -M particleboard.

SECTION 06410
– GENERAL

WORK INCLUDED
A. Fabricated cabinet units.

B. Plastic laminate counter tops.

SUBMITTALS
A.

B.

MANUFACTURERS
A.

WOOD MATERIALS
A.
otherwise noted.

B.

SHEET MATERIALS
A.
resistant adhesive.

1. Submit shop drawings and product data under provisions of Sections 01001. accessory listings, and schedule of finished.

Acceptable manufacturers: As selected by Owner.

Provide ¾” high density particleboard,

CASEWORK AND MILLWORK
Include materials, component profiles, fastening methods, assembly methods, joint details, Hardwood lumber FS MM-L-736- graded in accordance with AWI maximum moisture content of 6% species birch, for drawer sides and backs paint or stain as directed by Owner unless Material for jambs shall be solid stock with flat jambs with ‘T’ stops a minimum of 11/16” thick and rabbeted jambs a minimum 13/16” thick, custom grade for opaque finish.

Wood Particleboard: Per AWI standard, composed of wood chips, made with water and mold ,
Fire block Construction: Except as provided in paragraph 4, above, fireblocking shall consist of 2 inches nominal lumber or two thickness of 1 inch nominal lumber with broken lap or one thickness of 23/32 inch PART 3

3.01 3.02

3.03 TOLERANCES
PART 1

1.01 PART 2

2.01 2.02
PART 3

3.01 PART 4
A.

A.

B.

3.03 A.

B.

C. Prime paint items with two coats.

PART 3 EXECUTION

3.01 EXAMINATION

3.02 PREPARATION

INSTALLATIONS
A.

Clean surfaces of rust, scale, grease, and foreign matter prior to finishing.

Do not prime surfaces in direct contact with concrete or where field welding is required.

Verify that field conditions are acceptable and are ready to receive work.

Clean and strip primed steel items to bare metal where site welding is required.

Supply items required to be cast into concrete with setting templates, to appropriate section.

Install items plumb and level, accurately fitted, free from distortion or defects.

2.02 FINISHES
and testing.

Retesting required because of non -
to the subcontractor.
with all local codes and regulations.
gates with locks.

Provide and maintain required facilities and enclosures.

Maintain in clean and sanitary condition.

Provide fencing to prevent unauthorized entry to construction areas and to protect existing facilities and adjacent properties from damage.

Construction: Commercial grade chain link fence, new or used.

1.12 A.

B.

C.

D.

1.13 A.

B.

C.

1.14 A.

B.

C.

1.15 A.

INSPECTION AND TESTING LABORATORY SERVICES
TEMPORARY SANITARY FACILITIES (By Contractor)
BARRIERS AND FENCING (By Contractor)
PROTECTION OF INSTALLED WORK (By Contractor)
Provided by Owner/Contractor.

SHEDS
Office: Weather -
Restor
systems forming the
Provide seven (7) days notification t
Prohibit traffic or storage upon waterproofed or roofed surfaces.

Provide security and facilities to protect Work
equipment, and equipped with sturdy furniture and drawing display table. fabrication, conveying and erection of the Work.

Clean and repair damage caused by installation or use of temporary work. e existing facilities used during construction to original condition. Restore permanent facilities used during construction to specified condition.

Products: Means new material, machinery, components, equipment, fixtures, and work, but does not include machinery and equipment used for preparation, fabrication, conveying and erection of the Work.

Use interchangeable components of the same manufacture for similar components.

Execute start -
manufacturers’ instructions.

S
functioning correctly.
prior to date of final inspection.

For
season within nine (9) months.
testing, adjusting, and balancing.

Cooperate with
Retesting required because of non -
to the subcontractor.

Ensure that each piece of equipment or system is ready for operation. up under supervision of responsible persons in accordance with Thoroughly m
ASTM C270
Do not use anti -
ASTM C476 Coarse grout.

Do not use anti -
Grout Mixing

2.03 2.04

1.01 MORTAR MIXING
A.

B.

Grout Mixes
A.

B.

2.05 PART 3 EXECUTION

3.01 INSTALLATION
A.

B.

B.

A.

SECTION INCLUDES
PART 1 GENERAL
ix mortar ingredients in quantities needed for immediate use in accordance with freeze compounds to lower the freezing point of mortar.

Thoroughly mix mortar ingredients in quantities needed for immediate use in accordance with freeze compounds to lower the freezing point of grout.

Install mortar and grout in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions.

Work grout into masonry cores and cavities to eliminate voids. Do not displace reinforcement.

REINFORCED MASONRY UNIT
Reinforced concrete masonry units, reinforcement, anchorage, and accessories, Concrete masonry units, reinforcement, anchorage, and accessories.

SECTION 04300
dimensional position.

Embed anchors as shown on plans.

1.02 2.01

2.02 3.01

3.02 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
A.

PART 2 PRODUCTS

CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS
A.

REINFORCEMENT AND ANCHORAGE
A.

EXAMINATION AND PREPARATION
PART 3 EXECUTION
A.

B.

A.

B.

Misc. manufactured metal products.

Roof access ladder, field painted.

Verify field measurements.

Fabricate items with joints tight
tight.

1.01 1.02

2.01 PART 1 GENERAL

SECTION INCLUDES
A.

B.

C.

D.

FIELD MEASUREMENTS
A.

PART 2 PRODUCTS

FABRICATION
A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

F.

G.

SECTION 05500
METAL FABRICATION AND MISC. PRODUCTS
Shop fabricated ferrous metal, aluminum items, galvanized and prime painted.

Custom wrought iron trash enclosure gates.

Fit and shop assemble in largest practical section, for delivery to site. ly fitted and secured.

Continuously seal joined members by continuous welds.

Grind exposed joints flush and smooth with adjacent finish surface. Make exposed joints butt Exposed Mechanical Fastenings: Flush countersunk screws or bolts, unobtrusively located, flush, and hairline. Erase exposed edges to small uniform radius.

Supply components required for anchorage of fabrications. Fabricate anchors and related consistent with design of component, except where specifically noted otherwise. Components of same material and finish as fabrication, except where specifically noted otherwise.

Field verify required dimensions prior to fabrication.

Conform to Uniform Building Code, latest applicible edition. medium weight 2000 psi. unless otherwise indicated in structural notes and calcs.

Hollow load bearing blockunits: ASTM C90 Grade N, Type II - Non - moisture controlled Reinforcing steel: ASTM A615, 60 ksi. yield grade, deformed billet bars, unprotested finish.

Verify that field conditions are acceptable and ready to receive work.

Coordinate placement of anchors supplied to other sections.

REINFORCEMENT AND ANCHORAGES - REINFORCED MASONRY UNIT
Support and secure reinforcing bars from displacement. Maintain position within 1/2" of for structural building walls, shall be be as indicated on drawings and structural calcs. and with the requirements of the Contract Documents.
independent firm, furnish assistance as requested.
to start-up of each item.

B.

1.16 A.

1.17 A.

1.18 A.

1.19 A.

B.

C.

1.20 A.

B.

1.21 A.

B.

C.

D.

1.22 A.

B.

1.23 A.

B.

C.

D.

1.24 A.
prescribed.

SECURITY (By Contractor)

PROJECT IDENTIFICATION

FIELD OFFICES AND

REMOVAL OF UTILITIES, FACILITIES AND CONTROLS

PRODUCTS

STARTING SYSTEMS

DEMONSTRATION AND INSTRUCTIONS

TESTING, ADJUSTING, AND BALANCING

CONTRACT AND CLOSE OUT PROCEDURES
specification sections.

PART 1 –

1.01 A.

1. 2.

B.

1. 1.02
A.

1. 2.

3. B.

1. 2.

C.

1. GENERAL

INVITATION
Bid Submission:

Offers will be opened privately.

Intent:
in accordance with the Contract Documents.

Definitions:

Bid, Offer, or
Availability:

Examination:
tion:

3. D.

1. 2.

3. 4.

F.

1. 2.

1.03 A.

1. 2.
the documents be inco
Queries/Addenda:

Direct questions tot he Architect.

Verbal answers are not binding on any party.
receipt of Bids. The reply will be in the
Product/System Substitutions:
accepted.

SITE ASSESSMENT
Site Examina
involved.

CE/REJECTION

1.04 A.

1. 1.05
A.

1. 2.

1.06 BID
A.

1.07 A.

1. 1.08

1. QUALIFICATIONS
Subcontractors/Suppliers/Others:
cause.

BID SUBMISSION
Submission Procedure:

INELIGIBILITY
Owner, be declared unacceptable

OFFER ACCEPTAN
Duration of offer:
the bid date.

ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER
thoroughly examined a

2. DOCUMENT 00100

INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
Bids signed and under seal, executed, and dated will be received by the Owner/Contractor.

The intent of the Bid request is to obtain subcontract offers to perform work for a Stipulated Sum,

BID DOCUMENTS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
Contract Documents: Defined in A1A A201 1987 Edition Article 1 including issued Addenda.

Bidding: Act of submitting an offer under seal.

Bid sum: Monetary sums identified by the Bidder.

Bid Documents may be obtained at the office of the Owner/Contractor.

Bid Documents are made available only for the purpose of obtaining offers for this project. Their use does not grant a license for other purposes.

Bid Documents are on display at the Owner’s office.

Upon receipt of Bid Documents verify that documents are complete. Notify the Architect should mplete 20 days prior to submitting bid.

Immediately notify the Architect upon finding discrepancies or omissions in the id Documents.

Addenda may be issued during the Bidding Period. All Addenda become part of the Contract Documents. Include resultant costs in the Bid Sum
Clarifications requested by Bidders must be in writing not less than 10 days before date set for form of an Addendum.

Substitute products will be considered only if approved byte Owner.

Provide products as specified unless substitutions are submitted in this manner and subsequently Bidders shall visit and carefully examine the site of the proposed work and acquaint themselves with the conditions under which work will be performed and nature and extent of the work In the event that any conflict is discovered between actual conditions existing on site and conditions described or indicated on drawings or in then project manual. The bidder shall request clarification before his offer is submitted. Otherwise, it will be assumed that premises have been nd found to be acceptably described. In such event, it will be the responsibility of the Contractor to produce the finished results indicated on drawings and specified herein without claim for additional compensation form the Owner.

The Owner reserves the right to reject a proposed subcontractor / suppliers/others for reasonable Bidders shall be solely responsible for the delivery of the Bids in the manner and time Submit one copy of the executed offer, signed and sealed in a closed opaque envelope, clearly identified with Bidder’s name, project name, dates and time bid is required to be submitted, and Owner’s name and project number on the outside.

Bids that are unsigned, improperly signed or sealed, conditional, illegible, obscure contain arithmetical errors, erasures, alterations, or irregularities of any kind, may at the discretion of the Bids shall remain open to acceptance and shall be irrevocable for a period of thirty (30) days after The Contractor reserves the right to accept or reject any or all offers and to wave irregularity in the bidding authorities.
payments, and sum remaining due.
sta
and soft surfaces.

Replace filters of operating equipment.

Provide submittals to Owner/Contractor that are required by governing or other Execute final cleaning prior to final inspection.

Clean debris from site, roofs, and drainage systems.

Remove waste and surplus materials, rubbish, and constructio B.

C.

1.25 A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

FINAL CLEANING
Building Code
PART 1 –

1.01 A.

GENERAL

GOVERNING LAW
ADA
ANSI
Uniform
Uniform Mechanical Code
SECTION 01001

BASIC REQUIREMENTS
All work shall be performed in accordance with applicable requirements of the following:
and accept the bid which is most advantageous to the Owner. for Owner/Contractor inspection.

Owner will appoint and employ services of an independent firm to perform inspection The independent firm will perform inspections, tests, and other services as required.

Cooperate with independent firms; furnish samples and access to work as required. conformance to specified requirements will be charged
Toilet facilities shall be connected to sewer, or an approved chemical type complying Provide 6 ft. high fence around construction site, equip with vehicular and pedestrian Protect installed work and provide special protection where specified in individual tight, with lighting, electrical outlets, heating cooling and ventilating Remove temporary above grade or buried utilities, equipment, fixtures, and systems forming the work, but does not include machinery and equipment used for preparation, o Architect/Owner and independent testing firm prior
ubmit a written report that equipment or system has been properly installed and is Demonstrate operation and maintenance of Products to Owner’s personnel two weeks equipment or systems requiring seasonal operation, perform demonstrations for other Owner will appoint, employ, and pay for services of an independent firm to perform Reports will be submitted by the independent firm to Owner indicating observations and results of tests and indicating compliance or non-compliance with specified requirements conformance to specified requirements will be charged
Submit written certification that Contract Documents have been reviewed, Work has been inspected, and the Work is complete in accordance with Contract Documents and ready Submit final Application for Payment identifying total adjusted Contract Sum, previous Clean interior and exterior glass and surfaces exposed to view, remove temporary levels, ins and foreign substances, polish transparent and glossy surfaces, vacuum carpeted n facilities from the site.
studs along and in line with the run of stairs if the walls under the stairs are unfinished. -
– EXECUTION

FRAMING
A.

B.
of permanent bracing.

C.

D.

E.
inches.

F.

G. Nailing schedule per the adopted Edition of the IBC

SHEATHING
A.

B.

Set structural members level and plumb, in correct position.

Place horizontal members flat, crown side up.
to floor joists. Frame rigidly into joists.
alternating lapping side members.

Table No. 25
members. Provide solid edge blocking between sheets.

Make provisions for erection loads, and for sufficient temporary bracing to maintain structure safe, plumb, and in true alignment until completion of erection and installation Construct load bearing framing and curb members full length without splices.

Place full width continuous sill flashings under framed walls on. Lap flashing joint 4 Curb roof openings except where prefabricated curbs are provided. From corners by Q, unless otherwise indicated.

Secure roof sheathing perpendicular to framing members with ends staggered and sheet ends over trim bearing. Use sheathing clips between sheets between roof framing Install telephone and electrical panel boards with plywood sheathing material where A.

B.
– GENERAL

SECTION INCLUDES
A. Blocking in roof and wall openings.

B. Wood furring and grounds.

C.
– PRODUCTS

MATERIALS
A. Lumber grading rules: WPA
B.
pressure preservative treatment.

ACCESSORIES
A. Fasteners and Anchors:

1. Fasteners: Hot -
unfinished steel elsewhere.

2. unfinished steel elsewhere.

Framing Members: ¼ inch from true position, maximum.

SECTION 06114

WEOOD BLOCKING AND CURBING
’s instructions.

INSTALLATION
A.

B.

C.

D.
lapping side members.
–

1. 2.
shall be maintained.

3. Set members level and plumb, in correct position.

Place horizontal members flat, crown side up.

Construct curb members of single pieces.

FIRE BLOCKS AND DRAFT STOPS
Materials shall be installed according to manufacturer
Fire blocks: Fireblocking shall be provided in the following locations:
floor levels and at 10 foot intervals both vertical and horizontal. soffits, drip ceilings and cove ceilings.
– EXECUTION
Surface Flatness of Floor: ¼ inch in 10 feet maximum, ½ inch maximum in 30 feet.

Concealed wood blocking for support of toilet and bath accessories and wall cabinets.

Miscellaneous framing: Stress Group D, Douglas Fir species, 19% maximum moisture content dipped galvanized steel for high humidity and treated wood locations, Anchors: expansion shield and lag bolt type for anchorage to solid masonry or concrete Curb roof openings except where prefabricated curbs are provided. Form corners by alternating General: In combustible construction fireblocking and draftstopping shall be installed to:

Protect surface from damage until final acceptance. Cit off all concealed draft openings (both vertical and horizontal) and shall form an effective barrier between floors, between a top story and a roof or attic space and shall subdivide attic spaces, concealed roof spaces and floor-ceiling assemblies. The integrity of all fire blocks and draft stops

1. In concealed spaces of stud walls and partitions, including furred spaces, at the ceiling and

2. At all interconnections between concealed vertical and horizontal spaces such as occur at In concealed spaces between stair stringers at the top and bottom of the run and between required. Over size the panel by 12 inches on all sides. (Note: Fireblocks may be omitted at floor and ceiling levels when approved smoke-actuated fire dampers are installed at these levels.)

4. 5. At openings between

6. shall be filled with
communication under the flooring between adjoining rooms.

In openings around vents, pipes, ducts, chimney, fireplaces and similar openings which afford a passage for fire at ceiling and floor levels with noncumbustible materials. attic spaces and c chimney chases for factory built chimneys Where wood sleepers are used for laying wood flooring on masonry or concrete fire resistive floors, the spaces between the floor slab and the underside of the world flooring noncombustible material or fire blocked in such a manner that there will be no open spaces under the flooring which will exceed 100 square feet in area and such space shall be filled solidly under all permanent partitions so that there is no NOTE:

THESE SPECIFICATIONS ARE GENERAL IN NATURE AND

ARE ONLY APPLICABLE TO THE SCOPE OF WORK UNDER

THE PROVISION ALLOWED BY THE STATE AGENCY OF THE
DESIGNER OF RECORD. ALL OTHER SPECIFICATIONS WITHIN

THIS DOCUMENT TO BE COORDINATED AND SUPERSEDED

BY ANY/ALL OTHER GENERAL NOTES, SPECIFICATIONS OR

DETAILS PROVIDED BY ANY/ALL CONSULTANTS ASSOCIATED
WITH THIS PROJECT. PER NRS 623
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 2.1 SPECIFICATIONS SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA 379
D
W
D
W
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 3.1 DIM FLOOR PLAN "E" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 D
A9.0 E
A9.0 D A9.0 E
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 D
A9.0 E
A9.0 D A9.0 E

BEDROOM
CLOS
BAR
GARAGE
BATH
GARAGE
BATH
BAR

BEDROOM
WH
PWDR
BATH
DINING

LIVING LIVING
LOFT

BEDROOM

BEDROOM

BEDROOM
PWDR
CL
CL
23'-6"
35'-6"
20'-0 1/2" 20'-0 1/2" 20'-0"
40'-11 1/2"
43'-0"
51'-0"

KITCHEN

KITCHEN
CL
BATH
DINING
CLOS
8'-0" 4'-0"
4'-10" 41'-4" 4'-10"
4'-0" 8'-0" 23'-6"
4'-6 1/2" 4'-4" 4'-4" 10'-3 1/2"
51'-0"
25'-6" 25'-6"
2'-0 1/2" 7'-0 1/2" 9'-3" 4'-4" 2'-10" 2'-10" 4'-4" 9'-3 3/4" 6'-11 3/4" 2'-0 1/2" 10'-3 1/2" 4'-4" 4'-4" 4'-6 1/2"
10'-7 1/2" 10'-0 1/2" 10'-0 1/2" 10'-7 1/2"
7'-1 1/4" 2'-3" 4'-11 3/4"
3'-3"
6'-10" 12'-4" 5'-0" 5'-0" 12'-4" 6'-10"5'-5 3/4" 2'-3 1/4" 6'-9" 2'-1 1/4" 4'-9"
3'-5" 3'-3" 3'-4"
3'-7"
3'-3"
8'-6"
10'-9"
11'-1"
6'-0" 13'-2" 6'-4" 13'-2" 5'-8"
25'-6" 25'-2"
50'-8"
6'-4"
19'-11" 7'-11 3/4" 8'-1 1/4" 7'-0"
36'-0"
18'-7 1/2"
12'-11 3/4"
17'-4 1/4" 4'-11 3/4"
2'-10" 4'-1" 9'-2 1/4" 1'-3" 5'-8"
4'-10" 5'-0" 1'-9 1/4" 4'-11 3/4" 4'-11 1/4" 1'-9 1/4" 2'-2 1/2" 4'-0" 4'-6 1/2" 12'-1 1/2" 4'-10" 25'-6" 25'-6"
51'-0"
35'-6"
24'-10"
9'-8" 8'-4"
7'-11"
12'-0"
5'-4"
10'-8"
8'-3"
14'-4"
4'-10"
13'-2"
4'-7 3/4"
7'-11" 11'-9"
12'-8"
11'-8 1/4"
8'-11 1/2"
9'-11"
6'-11 1/2"
10'-5"
11'-8"
8'-5 1/4"
4'-5"
7'-0 1/4" 3'-8 3/4" 3'-7 3/4" 11'-10 1/4"
WH
3'-10"
3'-5" 3'-8 1/4"
3'-3"
8'-11" 3'-5" 5'-0" 2'-11 3/4"5'-0" 3'-5" 8'-11"
5'-8"
5'-7 1/2"
5'-1 1/2"
7'-11"
2'-11 3/4"
24'-10"
1'-6" 1'-6"
2'-7"
3'-9" 4'-8"
8'-10 1/4"
3'-9"
4'-8"
7'-8 3/4"
5'-0"
6'-7 3/4"
14'-8" 5'-0"
2'-0"
11'-9"
CL
BATH
11'-8 1/4"
6'-2 3/4" 4'-6"
2'-3 1/2"
3'-11" 3'-3"
3'-6"
7'-11"
5'-0"
3'-3"
6'-6"
6'-3"
8'-0 1/4"
12'-4"
2'-2 1/4" 2'-10 1/2" 7'-0"
2'-6"
1'-6" 1'-6"
1'-1"
4'-5 3/4"
9'-0 1/2"
FIRST FLOOR PLAN "E" UPPER FLOOR PLAN "E"
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
UNIT A
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF

UNIT B UNIT A UNIT B
TOTAL: 1481 SF
SF LIVING: 1062 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
TOTAL: 1459 SF
SF LIVING: 1040 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
380

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
25'-0"
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 3.2 ELEVATIONS "E" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
25'-0"

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
25'-0"
4 12 4 12
1 5 3 3 3 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 4 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 4 3 3 3 5 1
1 3 3 3 3 3 4 2 3 5 1 1 5 3 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 1
1 5 3 3 3 4 4 4
3 2 2 3
2 2
3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 1
1 FINISHED GRADE
2 FASCIA, ACCENT COLOR AS SPCIFIED
3 BODY COLOR AS SPECIFIED
4 ASPHALT ROOF ROOFING, COLOR AS SPECIFIED
5 PORCELAIN TILE AS SPECIFIED

KEYNOTES
NOTE: ALL WINDOW AND DOORS TO BE WHITE VINYL

NOT LABELED FOR CLARITY
NOTE: FOR COLOR SPECIFICATIONS AND SCEDULE
REFER TO SHEET A 1.2 FOR COLOR PALETTE
TYP. SLAB ON FINISHED GRADE CONSTRUCTION
OVER 30# FELT PAPER, ROOF SHEATHING, AND PRE MFG TRUSS SYSTEM.

SEE DETAIL 19 ON A9.2
OVER SHEATHING, 5'8" SHEET ROCK, FOAM INSULATION,
TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION: SAND FINISH STUCCO
AND A TYPICAL FRAMED WALL, AS SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER.

SEE DETAIL 1 THROUGH 4 ON A9.2
REAR ELEVATION "E"
STREET ELEVATION "E"
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION "E" RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION "E"
6 SOLAR LOCATED ON ROOF
6 6
6 6
381
INSULATION @ R3.75 PER INCH, TO MAKE

CONDITIONED ATTIC SPACE

TYPICAL MFG TRUSS AND SHEATHING

REFER TO ENGINEERING
A TOTAL R VALUE OF 30.00 TO BOTTOM OF

ROOF SHEATHING
INSTALL 8" OF CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM
OR,
INSTALL R30 BATT INSULATION TO THE

BOTTOM OF ROOF SHEATHING

18. 19.

20. 21.

WHERE EVE VENTING OCCURS, FIRE BLOCK BELOW FASCIA @ STUD WALL AND LAY EVERY THIRD MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEEN HIGH AND LOW VENTS IS 3'-0" (MIN.).

ANY CHANGES IN THE ROOF SYSTEM (IE., SIZE, SHAPE, ETC. TO BE REPORTED IN WRITING TO NO CLOSER THAN 3'-0" TO THE EAVE
HIGH VENTS SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 1'-0" TO THE RIDGE AND LOW TILE VENTS SHALL BE TO ROOF CONNECTIONS, PAINT FLASHING TO MATCH.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

13. 14.

15. 16.

17. ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1'-0" FROM EDGE OF ROOF CRICKETS OR CANT

ON SITE VERIFICATION OF ALL CONDITIONS REQUIRED OF THE TRUSS SUPPLIER OR CONTRACTOR BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OR THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR.

OVER FRAMING TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FRAMING CONTRACTOR OR AS SPECIFIED INSTALLATION OF THE TRUSS SYSTEM, ON SITE FILLS , "CUT AND STACK" FRAMING AND ALL

PRIOR TO MANUFACTURING OF ANY TRUSSES OR COMPONENTS, THIS IS TO ENSURE PROPER SIZES QUANTITIES, SHAPES, SIZES, CONFIGURATIONS, ETC. OF ALL TRUSSES, HIP SETS, GABLE ENDS, "DREW-COAT" WATERPROOF DECKING MEMBRANE OVER O.S.B. FLOOR SHEATHING PROVIDE "DREW COAT" WATERPROOF DECKING MEMBRANE OVER THIS AREA OR EQUAL.

PROVIDE "BITHUTHENE 3000" WATERPROOF MEMBRANE AT ALL HORIZ. APPLICATIONS OF FIREPLACE. STACK LAP OVER SIDES MIN 6" ALL UNDER 20 GAL. G.I. CAP w/ MIN 2" LAP OVER SIDES. WELD ALL BREAKS IN PAN AND SLOPE TO DRAIN.

TO AVOID CONFLICTS.

ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BETWEEN TRADES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION STRIPS (TYPICAL).

APPORIATE BRACING PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY

ROOF TRUSS SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS USING ALL

REGARDING THE ACCOMMODATION OF THE INSTALLATION OF THE HEATING VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC) SYSTEM AND ITS' COMPONENTS.

TRUSS SUPPLIER TO ENSURE THAT ALL TRUSSES CONFORM TO ANY AND ALL SPECIFICATIONS

TRUSS SUPPLIER TO ENSURE THAT ALL TRUSSES CONFORM TO ANY AND ALL SPECIFICATIONS OF FRAMING CONTRACTOR TO USE SIMPSON HURRICANE CLIPS 2.5 OR BETTER AT THE END OF

ALL TRUSSES OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OR TRUSS SUPPLIER

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

INSTALLATION.

ROOFING SUB CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL FLASHING THROUGHOUT AND PROVIDE

PROVIDE LEAD FLASHING AT PROTRUDING PIPES THROUGH ROOF AND AT CURVED WALL

ROOF IS TO BE FLASHED AND COUNTER FLASHED AT WALLS, VALLEYS, PENETRATIONS, AND PROVIDE ALL BLOCKING AND FIRE STOPS AS REQUIRED.

ALL APPROPRIATE AREAS.

SEE STRUCT'L GENERAL NOTES FOR ROOF SHEATHING.

DASHED LINES DENOTE WALLS BELOW THE ROOF FRAMING.

BLOCKING AND ALL OTHER ROOF SYSTEM COMPONENTS ARE ASSUMED TO BE SUPPLIED IN THE "TRUSS PACKAGE" BY THE TRUSS MANUFACTURER.

AND QUANTITIES

THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PERTAINING TO DRAG TRUSSES, SHEAR TRUSSES, ETC

THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IMMEDIATELY
VENT BLOCK HORIZ. w/ BAFFLE AT INSULATION.

ROOF FRAMING (TRUSS) NOTES
BASIS FOR DESIGN:

ROOF TO BE UNVENTED AS ALLOWED PER IRC 806.5 WITH ALL CONDITIONS

ROOF VENTILATION DESIGN
MET AND/OR EXCEEDED. REFER TO DETAIL F ABOVE
SLOPE 1/2":12 SLOPE 1/2":12
- TEMPERED GLASS
1 2-10 6-10
- SC - TEMPERED GLASS
- SWINGING
2 2-6 6-10 (X2)
- SC - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLDR
3 4-0 5-0
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
4 2-10 5-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
5 4-0 6-0
- METAL -STEEL GATE
13 3-0 4-10
- SWINGING - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
6 4-0 3-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
7 2-0 4-0
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
8 1-2 1-2
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
9 1-6 2-8
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
10 2-4 2-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
11 2-4 2-4
- METAL
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
6'-10"
2'-10"
6'-10"
5'-0"
- SWINGING
5'-0"
4'-0" 2'-4"
2'-4"
2'-4"
3'-0"
4'-10"
2'-4"
1'-6"
2'-8"
1'-2"
EQ
4'-0"
2'-0"
4'-0"
3'-4"
6'-0"
4'-0"
2'-10"
5'-4"
1'-9"
1'-6"
2'-10"
3'-5"
4'-10"
5'-8"
4'-2"
4'-6"
5'-10"

2. AS SET FORTH IN THE ADOPTED IRC AND/ALL CC&RS
PROVIDE SAFETY GLAZING IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: SECTION 308.4.1 TO R308.4.7. IRC. WINDOWS IN ALL SLEEPING AREAS SHALL MEET EGRS REQUIRED A) SLIDING OR SWINGING DOORS EXCEPT JALOUSIES.

B) TUB AND OR SHOWER ENCLOSURE AND
GLAZING IN THE WALLS LESS THAN 60” ABOVE THE STANDING SURFACES OF TUBS OR SHOWERS.

C) GLAZING IN FIXED AND SLIDING PANELS OF SLIDING DOOR ASSEMBLIES AND PANELS IN SLIDING AND BI -FOLD CLOSET DOOR ASSEMBLIES.

D) GLAZING IN DOORS AND ENCLOSURES
FOR HOT TUBS, WHIRLPOOLS, SAUNAS, STEAM ROOMS, BATHTUBS AND SHOWERS. GLAZING IN

ANY PART OF A BUILDING WALL ENCLOSING THESE COMPARTMENTS WHERE THE BOTTOM EXPOSED EDGE OF THE GLAZING IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES MEASURED HORIZONTALLY AND

VERTICALLY AND IN STRAIGHT LINE, FROM THE WATER EDGE AT ANY STANDING OR WALKING SURFACE.

1. EXTERIOR DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULE

ALL GLAZING TO BE INSTALLED IN COMPLIANCE AND AS SPECIFIED WITH

THE APPROVED IECC REPORT AS SUBMITTED AND APPROVED WITH THIS

3. ALL GLAZING TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS

THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN CONCERT WITH THE SUPPLIER TO SUPPLY

4. ALL CUT SHEETS AND ROUGH OPENING SIZES TO THE FRAMING CONTRACTOR

THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND PERMIT

PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ALL WORK TO BE PREFORMED
F.F. ELEV. = 0'-0"
(1 CONT.)

E) GLAZING IN AN INDIVIDUAL FIXED OR OPERABLE PANEL ADJACENT TO A DOOR WHERE THE NEAREST VERTICAL EDGE OF THE GLAZING IS WITHIN A 24 INCHES ARC OF BOTH VERTICAL EDGE OF THE DOOR IN A CLOSE POSITION AND WHOSE BOTTOM EDGE IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR OR WALKING SURFACE.

F) GLAZING ADJACENT TO STAIRWAYS, LANDINGS AND RAMPS WITHIN 36 INCHES HORIZONTALLY OF A WALKING SURFACE WHEN THE EXPOSED SURFACE OF THE GLASS IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES ABOVE THE NOSE OF THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE.

G) GLAZING WITHIN 18” OF THE FLOOR, INDIVIDUAL PANEL GREATER THAN 9 SQUARE FEET. H) ALL GLAZING IN RAILINGS REGARDLESS OF AN AREA OR HEIGHT ABOVE A WALKING SURFACE.

INCLUDED ARE STRUCTURAL BALUSTERS PANELS AND NON -STRUCTURAL IN FILL PANELS.

TOP PLATE = 6'-10"
- TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
12 6-0 6-8
- METAL F
6'-0"
6'-8"
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 3.3 ROOF PLAN "E" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA ROOF PLAN "E"
382
FIRST FLOOR PLAN "A" UPPER FLOOR PLAN "A"
D
W
D
W
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 4.0 FLOORPLAN "A" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA

FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES
SHOWER TUB COMBO, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

TYPICAL RECESSED MEDICINE CABINET. SEE GC/OWNER
36" HIGH CAB, SEE GC/ OWNER AGENT FOR SPECS.

TYPICAL MIRROR. SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT DIMENSIONS.

WASHER, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

RECESSED WATER VALVE BOX.

LAUNDRY ROOM
WALL MOUNTED SHOWER HEAD AT 72" A.F.F.

TOILET, SEE GC/OWNER AGENT FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

SINK, SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

BATHROOM
SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT STLYE, MATERIAL AND COLOR.

COUNTER TOP @ 36" A.F.F. SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT

WALL MOUNTED UPPER CABINETS, SEE GC/OWNER FOR
RANGE/OVEN COMBO, SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

DISHWASHER SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER

GARBAGE DISPOSAL AT SINK SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER 36" BASE CABINETS SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT LAYOUT, MFG

REFRIGERATOR SPACE, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT DIMENSIONS

KITCHEN AND BAR
COUNTER TOP AT 30" A.F.F. W/ KNEE SPACE (WHERE OCCURS)
WHERE IS SHOWN PROVIDE 50CFM INTERMITTENT EXHAUST FAN.

AND ANY ADOPTED LOCAL AMENDMENTS.

THERE SHALL BE A FLOOR OR LANDING AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM

TYPICAL CONCRETE LANDING AT EXTERIOR DOOR SHALL NOT
PROVIDE HOSE-BIBB W/RECESSES BRADLEY 7910 HOSE BOX OR EQUAL GAS FIRED ON DEMAND WATER HEATER, #GT15-240NI
ELECTRICAL MAIN PANEL. SEE ELEC LOAD CALCS.

PER M1502.4.1, INSTALL DRYER MOISTURE EXHAUST DUCT SYSTEM F.A.U. SEE MECH FOR DETAILS PROVIDED THE DOOR DOES NOT SWING OVER THE LANDING. MIN EXT. DOOR SERVED. LANDING SHALL BE MIN 36" IN DIRECTION OF SLOPE SLAB/DECK 1/4" PER 1'-0" AWAY FROM STRUCTURE
TO ME DRYER VENT PRESSURE DROP CALCULATION FOR COMPLIANCE.

DIRECT VENT RANGE HOOD/MICROWAVE COMBO. SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR (MAX 14' IN LENGTH-INCLUDING (2) NINETY DEGREE ELBOWS. REFER OF EACH STAIRWAY. ALL LANDINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
IRC CODE AND ANY ADOPTED LOCAL AMENDMENTS.

ALL STAIRWAYS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT IRC CODE
NOT BE MORE THAN 8" BELOW THE TOP OF THE THRESHOLD,

WIDTH OF LANDING SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL. LINE OF THE FLOOR ABOVE/RAILING.

NOT IN USE

EXACT LAYOUT, MFG, MODEL AND COLOR

MODEL AND COLOR
STYLE, MATERIAL AND COLOR..

COUNTER TOP 18" WIDE @ 44" A.F.F. OVER 6" PONY WALL
SPECS. INSTALL PER MF'R SPECS, SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

PAPER HLDR, SEE BUILDER/OWNER AGENT FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

WHERE IS SHOWN, PROVIDE SMOKE & CARBON DETECTORS.

1. IN EACH SLEEPING ROOM
WILL ACTIVATE ALL ALARMS. THE ALARM SHALL BE CLEARLY AUDIBLE PER IRC, SECTION 313, 314.3

3. ON EACH ADDITIONAL FLOOR OF THE DWELLING.

BE WIRED IN A MANNER THAT IF THE ACTUATION OF ONE ALARM LOCATIONS:

2. OUTSIDE EACH SLEEPING ROOM IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF

OF THE BEDRROMS

WHEN ONE OR MORE DETECTOR IS TO BE INSTALLED ALL ARE TO IN ALL BR's OVER BACKGROUND NOISE WITH ALL DOORS CLOSED INSTALL DRYER BOX MODEL # BD480 OR EQUAL WITH OWNER APPROVAL

INSTALL KIDDE SMOKE/CO DUEL DETECTOR KNCOSMBA OR EQUAL

GENERAL NOTES

CLOSET BUILT-INS, SEE GC/ OWNER FOR LAYOUT, MATERIAL

AND FINISH
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 20
21 22
23 24
25 33
34 35
36 37
39 51
52 53
54 55
56 60
61 80
81 82
83 38
A.O. SMITH SIGNATURE PREMIRE 6.6 GPM 160,000 BTU NATURAL GAS

OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE MECHANICAL ENGINEER

TANKLESS WATER HEATER

SUPPLIER TO FURNISH AND MAKE AVAILABLE FOR ALL INSPECTIONS

INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS AND OPERATOR/OWNER MANUALS

SINK SIZE, MATERIAL SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER

7. EACH PIECE OF SHEATHING (OSB OR PLYWOOD) SHALL BEAR THE GRADE OF THE

WAS GRADED

8. ALL WOOD CONNECTORS HOLES SHALL BE FILLED WITH NAILS PER THE MFG

2. ALL WOOD IN CONTACT WITHIN OF CONCRETE SHALL BE RWD OR PRESSURE TREATED

1. ALL WOOD SHALL BE AT 19% OR LESS MOISTURE CONTENT PRIOR TO COVERING

AND TRADEMARK OF THE GRADING AGENCY UNDER WHOSE RULES THE MEMBER

SHEET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APA GRADING RULES

5. EACH PIECE OF WOOD FRAMING SHALL BEAR THE GRADE OF THE WOOD SPECIES NATURAL RESISTANCE TO DECAY SUCH AS REDWOOD OR CEDAR 3. ALL WOOD EXPOSED TO WEATHER SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED OR WOOD OF

GENERAL FRAMING NOTES

4. PRESSURE TREATED WOOD SHALL NOT CONTAIN EITHER CHROMIUM OR ARSENIC

INSTRUCTIONS AND THE ENGINEERS SPECIFICATIONS

9. ALL FASTENERS (NAILS, SCREWS, HOLD-DOWNS, STRAPS, ANCHOR BOLTS, ETC.) USED TO CONNECT PRESSURE TREATED WOOD SHALL BE CORROSION RESISTANT

GALVANIZED OR STAINLESS STEEL FASTENERS

10. ADHESIVES OR EPOXY ANCHORS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE MFG INSTRUCTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDING, BUY NOT LIMITED TO, INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE

HOLE SIZES, HOLE CLEANING , TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY AND SETTING WORKING TIMES

11.FRAMING (SUB) CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL FINISHED CONCRETE AREAS FROM DAMAGE WITH MIN 1/2" GYPSUM (OR EQUAL) INSTALLED HORIZONTAL OVER THOSE AREAS

12. WHEN POSSIBLE NO PINS, SHOTS, TEMPORARY NAILS TO BE EMBEDDED INTO CONCRETE SURFACE

THAT IS DEEMED TO BE A FINISHED OR EXPOSED AREA

13. USE NOTED DIMENSIONS RATHER THAN 'SCALED' DIMENSIONS

14. IF DIMENSION DISCREPANCIES ARISE CONTACT THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IMMEDIATELY FOR CLARIFICATION

15. DIMENSIONS NOTED ARE FACE OF STUD EXTERIOR, FINISHED (AFTER 5/8" SHEET ROCK) INTERIOR INSTALLED BELOW 60" FROM FINISHED GRADE

NOT IN USE
DRYER, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

NOT IN USE

NOT IN USE

BEDROOM

CLOS BAR
GARAGE
BATH
GARAGE
BATH
BAR

BEDROOM
DINING
CLOS
7 7
13 13
13 15 15
51 51
52 52
53 53
54 54
55 55
56 56
60 61 61 60
80 80
81 81
82 82
83 83
A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
2 A9.1
2 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
1 A9.1
4 A9.1
4 A9.1
1 A9.1
5 A9.1
5 A9.1
7 A9.1
8 A9.1
7 A9.1
8 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
6 A9.1
6 1 2-10 6-10 4 2-10 5-4 4 2-10 5-4 7 2-0 4-0 7 2-0 4-0 4 2-10 5-4 4 2-10 5-4 1 2-10 6-10 11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4 11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4
1 2-10 6-10
1 2-10 6-10
12 6-0 6-8 12 6-0 6-8
2 2-6 6-10 (X2) 9 1-6 2-8 (X2) 9 1-6 2-8 (X2)
3 4-0 5-0 3 4-0 5-0
10 2-4 2-4
7 2-0 4-0
4 2-10 5-4
7 2-0 4-0
4 2-10 5-4
4 2-10 5-4
7 2-0 4-0
4 2-10 5-4
7 2-0 4-0
9 1-6 2-8 (X3) 9 1-6 2-8 (X3)
BATH
CL

KITCHEN
BATH
BATH

LIVING LIVING
LOFT

BEDROOM BEDROOM

BEDROOM
CL
CL

KITCHEN
DINING
15 15
20 20
23 23
22 22 22
22 24 24
33 33
34 34
35 35
37 37
39 39
51 51
38 38
52 53
53 54
54 55
55 55
56 56
56 60
60 61
61 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
5 A9.1
5 A9.1
12 A9.1
12 A9.1
13 A9.1
13 A9.1
14 A9.1
14 A9.1
6 A9.1
6 A9.1
6 15
51 WH 2 WH 2
15 CL
53 54 54
54 53
51 54
52 52
52 52

BATH BATH
55 60 61
56 60
61 6 6
16 16
16 DECORATIVE SHROUD
17 ELECTRICAL PANEL TO BE FED BY SOLAR SOLUTION
17 UNIT A UNIT B
TOTAL: 1481 SF
SF LIVING: 1062 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
TOTAL: 1442 SF
SF LIVING: 1023 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
UNIT A
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
UNIT B
383
D
W
D
W
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 4.1 DIM FLOOR PLAN "A" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 D
A9.0 E
A9.0 D A9.0 E
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 D
A9.0 E
A9.0 D A9.0 E

BEDROOM
CLOS
BAR
GARAGE
BATH
GARAGE
BATH
BAR

BEDROOM
WH
PWDR
BATH
DINING

LIVING LIVING
LOFT

BEDROOM

BEDROOM

BEDROOM
PWDR
CL
CL
23'-6"
35'-6"
20'-0 1/2" 20'-0 1/2" 20'-0"
40'-11 1/2"
43'-0"
51'-0"

KITCHEN

KITCHEN
CL
BATH
DINING
CLOS
8'-0" 4'-0"
4'-10" 41'-4" 4'-10"
4'-0" 8'-0" 23'-6"
4'-6 1/2" 4'-4" 4'-4" 10'-3 1/2"
51'-0"
25'-6" 25'-6"
2'-0 1/2" 7'-0 1/2" 9'-3" 4'-4" 2'-10" 2'-10" 4'-4" 9'-3 3/4" 6'-11 3/4" 2'-0 1/2" 10'-3 1/2" 4'-4" 4'-4" 4'-6 1/2"
10'-7 1/2" 10'-0 1/2" 10'-0 1/2" 10'-7 1/2"
7'-1 1/4" 2'-3" 4'-11 3/4"
3'-3"
6'-10" 12'-4" 5'-0" 5'-0" 12'-4" 6'-10"5'-5 3/4" 2'-3 1/4" 6'-9" 2'-1 1/4" 4'-9"
3'-5" 3'-3" 3'-4"
3'-7"
3'-3"
8'-6"
10'-9"
11'-1"
6'-0" 13'-2" 6'-4" 13'-2" 5'-8"
25'-6" 25'-2"
50'-8"
6'-4"
12'-5 1/2" 7'-11 3/4" 8'-1 1/4" 7'-0"
36'-0"
18'-7 1/2"
12'-5 3/4"
17'-4 1/4" 4'-11 3/4"
2'-10" 4'-1" 9'-2 1/4" 1'-3" 6'-2"
4'-10" 5'-0" 1'-9 1/4" 4'-11 3/4" 4'-11 1/4" 1'-9 1/4" 2'-2 1/2" 4'-0" 4'-6 1/2" 12'-1 1/2" 4'-10" 25'-6" 25'-6"
51'-0"
35'-6"
24'-10"
9'-8" 8'-4"
7'-11"
12'-0"
5'-4"
10'-8"
8'-3"
14'-4"
4'-10"
13'-2"
4'-7 3/4"
7'-11" 11'-9"
12'-8"
11'-8 1/4"
8'-11 1/2"
9'-11"
6'-11 1/2"
10'-5"
11'-8"
8'-5 1/4"
4'-5"
7'-0 1/4" 3'-8 3/4" 3'-7 3/4" 11'-10 1/4"
WH
3'-10"
3'-5" 3'-8 1/4"
3'-3"
8'-11" 3'-5" 5'-0" 2'-11 3/4"5'-0" 3'-5" 8'-11"
5'-8"
5'-7 1/2"
5'-1 1/2"
7'-11"
2'-11 3/4"
24'-10"
1'-6" 1'-6"
2'-7"
3'-9" 4'-8"
8'-10 1/4"
3'-9"
4'-8"
7'-8 3/4"
5'-0"
6'-7 3/4"
14'-8" 5'-0"
2'-0"
11'-9"
CL
BATH
11'-8 1/4"
6'-2 3/4" 4'-6"
2'-3 1/2"
3'-11" 3'-3"
3'-6"
7'-11"
5'-0"
3'-3"
6'-6"
6'-3"
8'-0 1/4"
12'-4"
2'-2 1/4" 2'-10 1/2" 7'-0"
2'-6"
1'-6" 1'-6"
1'-1"
4'-5 3/4"
7'-5 1/2"
FIRST FLOOR PLAN "A" UPPER FLOOR PLAN "A"
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
UNIT A
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF

UNIT B UNIT A UNIT B
TOTAL: 1481 SF
SF LIVING: 1062 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
TOTAL: 1442 SF
SF LIVING: 1023 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
384
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 4.2 ELEVATIONS "A" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
25'-0"

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
25'-0"

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
25'-0"
4 12 4 12
1 5 3 3 3 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 4 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 4 3 3 3 5 1
1 3 3 3 3 3 4 2 3 5 1 1 5 3 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 1
1 5 3 3 3 4 4 4
3 2 2 3
2 2
3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 1
1 FINISHED GRADE
2 FASCIA, ACCENT COLOR AS SPCIFIED
3 BODY COLOR AS SPECIFIED
4 ASPHALT ROOF ROOFING, COLOR AS SPECIFIED
5 PORCELAIN TILE AS SPECIFIED

KEYNOTES
NOTE: ALL WINDOW AND DOORS TO BE WHITE VINYL

NOT LABELED FOR CLARITY
NOTE: FOR COLOR SPECIFICATIONS AND SCEDULE
REFER TO SHEET A 1.2 FOR COLOR PALETTE
TYP. SLAB ON FINISHED GRADE CONSTRUCTION
OVER 30# FELT PAPER, ROOF SHEATHING, AND PRE MFG TRUSS SYSTEM.

SEE DETAIL 19 ON A9.2
OVER SHEATHING, 5'8" SHEET ROCK, FOAM INSULATION,
TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION: SAND FINISH STUCCO
AND A TYPICAL FRAMED WALL, AS SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER.

SEE DETAIL 1 THROUGH 4 ON A9.2
REAR ELEVATION "A"
STREET ELEVATION "A"
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION "A" RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION "A"
6 6 6
6 6 SOLAR LOCATED ON ROOF
385
SLOPE 1/2":12 SLOPE 1/2":12
- TEMPERED GLASS
1 2-10 6-10
- SC - TEMPERED GLASS
- SWINGING
2 2-6 6-10 (X2)
- SC - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLDR
3 4-0 5-0
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
4 2-10 5-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
5 4-0 6-0
- METAL -STEEL GATE
13 3-0 4-10
- SWINGING - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
6 4-0 3-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
7 2-0 4-0
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
8 1-2 1-2
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
9 1-6 2-8
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
10 2-4 2-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
11 2-4 2-4
- METAL
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
6'-10"
2'-10"
6'-10"
5'-0"
- SWINGING
5'-0"
4'-0" 2'-4"
2'-4"
2'-4"
3'-0"
4'-10"
2'-4"
1'-6"
2'-8"
1'-2"
EQ
4'-0"
2'-0"
4'-0"
3'-4"
6'-0"
4'-0"
2'-10"
5'-4"
1'-9"
1'-6"
2'-10"
3'-5"
4'-10"
5'-8"
4'-2"
4'-6"
5'-10"

2. AS SET FORTH IN THE ADOPTED IRC AND/ALL CC&RS
PROVIDE SAFETY GLAZING IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: SECTION 308.4.1 TO R308.4.7. IRC. WINDOWS IN ALL SLEEPING AREAS SHALL MEET EGRS REQUIRED A) SLIDING OR SWINGING DOORS EXCEPT JALOUSIES.

B) TUB AND OR SHOWER ENCLOSURE AND
GLAZING IN THE WALLS LESS THAN 60” ABOVE THE STANDING SURFACES OF TUBS OR SHOWERS.

C) GLAZING IN FIXED AND SLIDING PANELS OF SLIDING DOOR ASSEMBLIES AND PANELS IN SLIDING AND BI -FOLD CLOSET DOOR ASSEMBLIES.

D) GLAZING IN DOORS AND ENCLOSURES
FOR HOT TUBS, WHIRLPOOLS, SAUNAS, STEAM ROOMS, BATHTUBS AND SHOWERS. GLAZING IN

ANY PART OF A BUILDING WALL ENCLOSING THESE COMPARTMENTS WHERE THE BOTTOM EXPOSED EDGE OF THE GLAZING IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES MEASURED HORIZONTALLY AND

VERTICALLY AND IN STRAIGHT LINE, FROM THE WATER EDGE AT ANY STANDING OR WALKING SURFACE.

1. EXTERIOR DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULE

ALL GLAZING TO BE INSTALLED IN COMPLIANCE AND AS SPECIFIED WITH

THE APPROVED IECC REPORT AS SUBMITTED AND APPROVED WITH THIS

3. ALL GLAZING TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS

THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN CONCERT WITH THE SUPPLIER TO SUPPLY

4. ALL CUT SHEETS AND ROUGH OPENING SIZES TO THE FRAMING CONTRACTOR

THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND PERMIT

PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ALL WORK TO BE PREFORMED
F.F. ELEV. = 0'-0"
(1 CONT.)

E) GLAZING IN AN INDIVIDUAL FIXED OR OPERABLE PANEL ADJACENT TO A DOOR WHERE THE NEAREST VERTICAL EDGE OF THE GLAZING IS WITHIN A 24 INCHES ARC OF BOTH VERTICAL EDGE OF THE DOOR IN A CLOSE POSITION AND WHOSE BOTTOM EDGE IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR OR WALKING SURFACE.

F) GLAZING ADJACENT TO STAIRWAYS, LANDINGS AND RAMPS WITHIN 36 INCHES HORIZONTALLY OF A WALKING SURFACE WHEN THE EXPOSED SURFACE OF THE GLASS IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES ABOVE THE NOSE OF THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE.

G) GLAZING WITHIN 18” OF THE FLOOR, INDIVIDUAL PANEL GREATER THAN 9 SQUARE FEET. H) ALL GLAZING IN RAILINGS REGARDLESS OF AN AREA OR HEIGHT ABOVE A WALKING SURFACE.

INCLUDED ARE STRUCTURAL BALUSTERS PANELS AND NON -STRUCTURAL IN FILL PANELS.

TOP PLATE = 6'-10"
- TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
12 6-0 6-8
- METAL F
6'-0"
6'-8"
INSULATION @ R3.75 PER INCH, TO MAKE

CONDITIONED ATTIC SPACE

TYPICAL MFG TRUSS AND SHEATHING

REFER TO ENGINEERING
A TOTAL R VALUE OF 30.00 TO BOTTOM OF

ROOF SHEATHING
INSTALL 8" OF CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM
OR,
INSTALL R30 BATT INSULATION TO THE

BOTTOM OF ROOF SHEATHING

18. 19.

20. 21.

WHERE EVE VENTING OCCURS, FIRE BLOCK BELOW FASCIA @ STUD WALL AND LAY EVERY THIRD MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEEN HIGH AND LOW VENTS IS 3'-0" (MIN.).

ANY CHANGES IN THE ROOF SYSTEM (IE., SIZE, SHAPE, ETC. TO BE REPORTED IN WRITING TO NO CLOSER THAN 3'-0" TO THE EAVE
HIGH VENTS SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 1'-0" TO THE RIDGE AND LOW TILE VENTS SHALL BE TO ROOF CONNECTIONS, PAINT FLASHING TO MATCH.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

13. 14.

15. 16.

17. ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1'-0" FROM EDGE OF ROOF CRICKETS OR CANT

ON SITE VERIFICATION OF ALL CONDITIONS REQUIRED OF THE TRUSS SUPPLIER OR CONTRACTOR BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OR THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR.

OVER FRAMING TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FRAMING CONTRACTOR OR AS SPECIFIED INSTALLATION OF THE TRUSS SYSTEM, ON SITE FILLS , "CUT AND STACK" FRAMING AND ALL

PRIOR TO MANUFACTURING OF ANY TRUSSES OR COMPONENTS, THIS IS TO ENSURE PROPER SIZES QUANTITIES, SHAPES, SIZES, CONFIGURATIONS, ETC. OF ALL TRUSSES, HIP SETS, GABLE ENDS, "DREW-COAT" WATERPROOF DECKING MEMBRANE OVER O.S.B. FLOOR SHEATHING PROVIDE "DREW COAT" WATERPROOF DECKING MEMBRANE OVER THIS AREA OR EQUAL.

PROVIDE "BITHUTHENE 3000" WATERPROOF MEMBRANE AT ALL HORIZ. APPLICATIONS OF FIREPLACE. STACK LAP OVER SIDES MIN 6" ALL UNDER 20 GAL. G.I. CAP w/ MIN 2" LAP OVER SIDES. WELD ALL BREAKS IN PAN AND SLOPE TO DRAIN.

TO AVOID CONFLICTS.

ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BETWEEN TRADES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION STRIPS (TYPICAL).

APPORIATE BRACING PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY

ROOF TRUSS SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS USING ALL

REGARDING THE ACCOMMODATION OF THE INSTALLATION OF THE HEATING VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC) SYSTEM AND ITS' COMPONENTS.

TRUSS SUPPLIER TO ENSURE THAT ALL TRUSSES CONFORM TO ANY AND ALL SPECIFICATIONS

TRUSS SUPPLIER TO ENSURE THAT ALL TRUSSES CONFORM TO ANY AND ALL SPECIFICATIONS OF FRAMING CONTRACTOR TO USE SIMPSON HURRICANE CLIPS 2.5 OR BETTER AT THE END OF

ALL TRUSSES OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OR TRUSS SUPPLIER

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

INSTALLATION.

ROOFING SUB CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL FLASHING THROUGHOUT AND PROVIDE

PROVIDE LEAD FLASHING AT PROTRUDING PIPES THROUGH ROOF AND AT CURVED WALL

ROOF IS TO BE FLASHED AND COUNTER FLASHED AT WALLS, VALLEYS, PENETRATIONS, AND PROVIDE ALL BLOCKING AND FIRE STOPS AS REQUIRED.

ALL APPROPRIATE AREAS.

SEE STRUCT'L GENERAL NOTES FOR ROOF SHEATHING.

DASHED LINES DENOTE WALLS BELOW THE ROOF FRAMING.

BLOCKING AND ALL OTHER ROOF SYSTEM COMPONENTS ARE ASSUMED TO BE SUPPLIED IN THE "TRUSS PACKAGE" BY THE TRUSS MANUFACTURER.

AND QUANTITIES

THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PERTAINING TO DRAG TRUSSES, SHEAR TRUSSES, ETC

THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IMMEDIATELY
VENT BLOCK HORIZ. w/ BAFFLE AT INSULATION.

ROOF FRAMING (TRUSS) NOTES
BASIS FOR DESIGN:

ROOF TO BE UNVENTED AS ALLOWED PER IRC 806.5 WITH ALL CONDITIONS

ROOF VENTILATION DESIGN
MET AND/OR EXCEEDED. REFER TO DETAIL F ABOVE
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 4.3 ROOF PLAN "A" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA ROOF PLAN "A"
386
FIRST FLOOR PLAN "C" UPPER FLOOR PLAN "C"
D
W
D
W
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 5.0 FLOORPLAN "C" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA

FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES
SHOWER TUB COMBO, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

TYPICAL RECESSED MEDICINE CABINET. SEE GC/OWNER
36" HIGH CAB, SEE GC/ OWNER AGENT FOR SPECS.

TYPICAL MIRROR. SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT DIMENSIONS.

WASHER, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

RECESSED WATER VALVE BOX.

LAUNDRY ROOM
WALL MOUNTED SHOWER HEAD AT 72" A.F.F.

TOILET, SEE GC/OWNER AGENT FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

SINK, SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

BATHROOM
SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT STLYE, MATERIAL AND COLOR.

COUNTER TOP @ 36" A.F.F. SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT

WALL MOUNTED UPPER CABINETS, SEE GC/OWNER FOR
RANGE/OVEN COMBO, SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

DISHWASHER SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER

GARBAGE DISPOSAL AT SINK SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER 36" BASE CABINETS SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT LAYOUT, MFG

REFRIGERATOR SPACE, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT DIMENSIONS

KITCHEN AND BAR
COUNTER TOP AT 30" A.F.F. W/ KNEE SPACE (WHERE OCCURS)
WHERE IS SHOWN PROVIDE 50CFM INTERMITTENT EXHAUST FAN.

AND ANY ADOPTED LOCAL AMENDMENTS.

THERE SHALL BE A FLOOR OR LANDING AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM

TYPICAL CONCRETE LANDING AT EXTERIOR DOOR SHALL NOT
PROVIDE HOSE-BIBB W/RECESSES BRADLEY 7910 HOSE BOX OR EQUAL GAS FIRED ON DEMAND WATER HEATER, #GT15-240NI
ELECTRICAL MAIN PANEL. SEE ELEC LOAD CALCS.

PER M1502.4.1, INSTALL DRYER MOISTURE EXHAUST DUCT SYSTEM F.A.U. SEE MECH FOR DETAILS PROVIDED THE DOOR DOES NOT SWING OVER THE LANDING. MIN EXT. DOOR SERVED. LANDING SHALL BE MIN 36" IN DIRECTION OF SLOPE SLAB/DECK 1/4" PER 1'-0" AWAY FROM STRUCTURE
TO ME DRYER VENT PRESSURE DROP CALCULATION FOR COMPLIANCE.

DIRECT VENT RANGE HOOD/MICROWAVE COMBO. SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR (MAX 14' IN LENGTH-INCLUDING (2) NINETY DEGREE ELBOWS. REFER OF EACH STAIRWAY. ALL LANDINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
IRC CODE AND ANY ADOPTED LOCAL AMENDMENTS.

ALL STAIRWAYS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT IRC CODE
NOT BE MORE THAN 8" BELOW THE TOP OF THE THRESHOLD,

WIDTH OF LANDING SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL. LINE OF THE FLOOR ABOVE/RAILING.

NOT IN USE

EXACT LAYOUT, MFG, MODEL AND COLOR

MODEL AND COLOR
STYLE, MATERIAL AND COLOR..

COUNTER TOP 18" WIDE @ 44" A.F.F. OVER 6" PONY WALL
SPECS. INSTALL PER MF'R SPECS, SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

PAPER HLDR, SEE BUILDER/OWNER AGENT FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

WHERE IS SHOWN, PROVIDE SMOKE & CARBON DETECTORS.

1. IN EACH SLEEPING ROOM
WILL ACTIVATE ALL ALARMS. THE ALARM SHALL BE CLEARLY AUDIBLE PER IRC, SECTION 313, 314.3

3. ON EACH ADDITIONAL FLOOR OF THE DWELLING.

BE WIRED IN A MANNER THAT IF THE ACTUATION OF ONE ALARM LOCATIONS:

2. OUTSIDE EACH SLEEPING ROOM IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF

OF THE BEDRROMS

WHEN ONE OR MORE DETECTOR IS TO BE INSTALLED ALL ARE TO IN ALL BR's OVER BACKGROUND NOISE WITH ALL DOORS CLOSED INSTALL DRYER BOX MODEL # BD480 OR EQUAL WITH OWNER APPROVAL

INSTALL KIDDE SMOKE/CO DUEL DETECTOR KNCOSMBA OR EQUAL

GENERAL NOTES

CLOSET BUILT-INS, SEE GC/ OWNER FOR LAYOUT, MATERIAL

AND FINISH
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 20
21 22
23 24
25 33
34 35
36 37
39 51
52 53
54 55
56 60
61 80
81 82
83 38
A.O. SMITH SIGNATURE PREMIRE 6.6 GPM 160,000 BTU NATURAL GAS

OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE MECHANICAL ENGINEER

TANKLESS WATER HEATER

SUPPLIER TO FURNISH AND MAKE AVAILABLE FOR ALL INSPECTIONS

INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS AND OPERATOR/OWNER MANUALS

SINK SIZE, MATERIAL SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER

7. EACH PIECE OF SHEATHING (OSB OR PLYWOOD) SHALL BEAR THE GRADE OF THE

WAS GRADED

8. ALL WOOD CONNECTORS HOLES SHALL BE FILLED WITH NAILS PER THE MFG

2. ALL WOOD IN CONTACT WITHIN OF CONCRETE SHALL BE RWD OR PRESSURE TREATED

1. ALL WOOD SHALL BE AT 19% OR LESS MOISTURE CONTENT PRIOR TO COVERING

AND TRADEMARK OF THE GRADING AGENCY UNDER WHOSE RULES THE MEMBER

SHEET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APA GRADING RULES

5. EACH PIECE OF WOOD FRAMING SHALL BEAR THE GRADE OF THE WOOD SPECIES NATURAL RESISTANCE TO DECAY SUCH AS REDWOOD OR CEDAR 3. ALL WOOD EXPOSED TO WEATHER SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED OR WOOD OF

GENERAL FRAMING NOTES

4. PRESSURE TREATED WOOD SHALL NOT CONTAIN EITHER CHROMIUM OR ARSENIC

INSTRUCTIONS AND THE ENGINEERS SPECIFICATIONS

9. ALL FASTENERS (NAILS, SCREWS, HOLD-DOWNS, STRAPS, ANCHOR BOLTS, ETC.) USED TO CONNECT PRESSURE TREATED WOOD SHALL BE CORROSION RESISTANT

GALVANIZED OR STAINLESS STEEL FASTENERS

10. ADHESIVES OR EPOXY ANCHORS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE MFG INSTRUCTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDING, BUY NOT LIMITED TO, INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE

HOLE SIZES, HOLE CLEANING , TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY AND SETTING WORKING TIMES

11.FRAMING (SUB) CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL FINISHED CONCRETE AREAS FROM DAMAGE WITH MIN 1/2" GYPSUM (OR EQUAL) INSTALLED HORIZONTAL OVER THOSE AREAS

12. WHEN POSSIBLE NO PINS, SHOTS, TEMPORARY NAILS TO BE EMBEDDED INTO CONCRETE SURFACE

THAT IS DEEMED TO BE A FINISHED OR EXPOSED AREA

13. USE NOTED DIMENSIONS RATHER THAN 'SCALED' DIMENSIONS

14. IF DIMENSION DISCREPANCIES ARISE CONTACT THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IMMEDIATELY FOR CLARIFICATION

15. DIMENSIONS NOTED ARE FACE OF STUD EXTERIOR, FINISHED (AFTER 5/8" SHEET ROCK) INTERIOR INSTALLED BELOW 60" FROM FINISHED GRADE

NOT IN USE
DRYER, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

NOT IN USE

NOT IN USE

BEDROOM

CLOS BAR
GARAGE
BATH
GARAGE
BATH
BAR

BEDROOM
DINING
CLOS
6 7 7
13 13
13 15 15
51 51
52 52
53 53
54 54
55 55
56 56
60 61 61 60
80 80
81 81
82 82
83 83
A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
2 A9.1
2 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
1 A9.1
4 A9.1
4 A9.1
1 A9.1
5 A9.1
5 A9.1
7 A9.1
8 A9.1
7 A9.1
8 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
6 A9.1
6 1 2-10 6-10 4 2-10 5-4 4 2-10 5-4 7 2-0 4-0 7 2-0 4-0 4 2-10 5-4 4 2-10 5-4 1 2-10 6-10 11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4 11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4
1 2-10 6-10
1 2-10 6-10
12 6-0 6-8 12 6-0 6-8
2 2-6 6-10 (X2) 9 1-6 2-8 (X2) 9 1-6 2-8 (X2)
3 4-0 5-0 3 4-0 5-0
10 2-4 2-4
7 2-0 4-0
4 2-10 5-4
7 2-0 4-0
4 2-10 5-4
4 2-10 5-4
7 2-0 4-0
4 2-10 5-4
7 2-0 4-0
9 1-6 2-8 (X3) 9 1-6 2-8 (X3)
BATH
CL

KITCHEN
BATH
BATH

LIVING LIVING
LOFT

BEDROOM BEDROOM

BEDROOM
CL
CL

KITCHEN
DINING
15 15
20 20
23 23
22 22 22
22 24 24
33 33
34 34
35 35
37 37 39 39
51 51
38 38
52 53
53 54
54 55
55 55
56 56
56 60
60 61
61 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
5 A9.1
5 A9.1
12 A9.1
12 A9.1
13 A9.1
13 A9.1
14 A9.1
14 A9.1
6 A9.1
6 A9.1
6 15
51 WH 2 WH 2
15 CL
53 54 54
54 53
51 54
52 52
52 52

BATH BATH
55 60 61
56 60
61 6
16 DECORATIVE SHROUD
16 16
17 ELECTRICAL PANEL TO BE FED BY SOLAR SOLUTION
17 UNIT A UNIT B
TOTAL: 1498 SF
SF LIVING: 1079 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
TOTAL: 1442 SF
SF LIVING: 1023 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
UNIT A
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
UNIT B
387
D
W
D
W
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 5.1 DIM FLOOR PLAN "C" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 D
A9.0 E
A9.0 D A9.0 E
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 D
A9.0 E
A9.0 D A9.0 E

BEDROOM
CLOS
BAR
GARAGE
BATH
GARAGE
BATH
BAR

BEDROOM
WH
PWDR
BATH
DINING

LIVING LIVING
LOFT

BEDROOM

BEDROOM

BEDROOM
PWDR
CL
CL
23'-6"
35'-6"
20'-0 1/2" 20'-0 1/2" 20'-0"
40'-11 1/2"
43'-0"
51'-0"

KITCHEN

KITCHEN
CL
BATH
DINING
CLOS
8'-0" 4'-0"
4'-10" 41'-4" 4'-10"
4'-0" 8'-0" 23'-6"
4'-6 1/2" 4'-4" 4'-4" 10'-3 1/2"
51'-0"
25'-6" 25'-6"
2'-0 1/2" 7'-0 1/2" 9'-3" 4'-4" 2'-10" 2'-10" 4'-4" 9'-3 3/4" 6'-11 3/4" 2'-0 1/2" 10'-3 1/2" 4'-4" 4'-4" 4'-6 1/2"
10'-7 1/2" 10'-0 1/2" 10'-0 1/2" 10'-7 1/2"
7'-1 1/4" 2'-3" 4'-11 3/4"
3'-3"
6'-10" 12'-4" 5'-0" 5'-0" 12'-4" 6'-10"5'-5 3/4" 2'-3 1/4" 6'-9" 2'-1 1/4" 4'-9"
3'-5" 3'-3" 3'-4"
3'-7"
3'-3"
8'-6"
10'-9"
11'-1"
6'-0" 13'-2" 6'-4" 13'-2" 5'-8"
25'-6" 25'-2"
50'-8"
6'-4"
6'-3" 7'-11 3/4" 8'-1 1/4" 7'-0"
36'-0"
18'-7 1/2"
12'-6"
17'-4 1/4" 4'-11 3/4"
2'-10" 4'-1" 9'-2 1/4" 1'-3" 6'-1 3/4"
4'-10" 5'-0" 1'-9 1/4" 4'-11 3/4" 4'-11 1/4" 1'-9 1/4" 2'-2 1/2" 4'-0" 4'-6 1/2" 12'-1 1/2" 4'-10" 25'-6" 25'-6"
51'-0"
35'-6"
24'-10"
9'-8" 8'-4"
7'-11"
12'-0"
5'-4"
10'-8"
8'-3"
14'-4"
4'-10"
13'-2"
4'-7 3/4"
7'-11" 11'-9"
12'-8"
11'-8 1/4"
8'-11 1/2"
9'-11"
6'-11 1/2"
10'-5"
11'-8"
8'-5 1/4"
4'-5"
7'-0 1/4" 3'-8 3/4" 3'-7 3/4" 11'-10 1/4"
WH
3'-10"
3'-5" 3'-8 1/4"
3'-3"
8'-11" 3'-5" 5'-0" 2'-11 3/4"5'-0" 3'-5" 8'-11"
5'-8"
5'-7 1/2"
5'-1 1/2"
7'-11"
2'-11 3/4"
24'-10"
1'-6" 1'-6"
2'-7"
3'-9" 4'-8"
8'-10 1/4"
3'-9"
4'-8"
7'-8 3/4"
5'-0"
6'-7 3/4"
14'-8" 5'-0"
2'-0"
11'-9"
CL
BATH
11'-8 1/4"
6'-2 3/4" 4'-6"
2'-3 1/2"
3'-11" 3'-3"
3'-6"
7'-11"
5'-0"
3'-3"
6'-6"
6'-3"
8'-0 1/4"
12'-4"
2'-2 1/4" 2'-10 1/2" 7'-0"
2'-6"
1'-6" 1'-6"
1'-1"
4'-5 3/4"
1'-3" 3'-4 1/2" 9'-0 1/2"
FIRST FLOOR PLAN "C" UPPER FLOOR PLAN "C"
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
UNIT A
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF

UNIT B UNIT A UNIT B
TOTAL: 1498 SF
SF LIVING: 1079 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
TOTAL: 1442 SF
SF LIVING: 1023 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
388
4 12 4 12
1 5 3 3 3 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 4 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 4 3 3 3 5 1
1 3 3 3 3 3 4 2 3 5 1 1 5 3 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 1
1 5 3 3 3 4 4 4
3 2 2 3
2 2
3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 1
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 5.2 ELEVATIONS "C" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
25'-0"

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
25'-0"
1 FINISHED GRADE
2 FASCIA, ACCENT COLOR AS SPCIFIED
3 BODY COLOR AS SPECIFIED
4 ASPHALT ROOF ROOFING, COLOR AS SPECIFIED
5 PORCELAIN TILE AS SPECIFIED

KEYNOTES
NOTE: ALL WINDOW AND DOORS TO BE WHITE VINYL

NOT LABELED FOR CLARITY
NOTE: FOR COLOR SPECIFICATIONS AND SCEDULE
REFER TO SHEET A 1.2 FOR COLOR PALETTE
TYP. SLAB ON FINISHED GRADE CONSTRUCTION
OVER 30# FELT PAPER, ROOF SHEATHING, AND PRE MFG TRUSS SYSTEM.

SEE DETAIL 19 ON A9.2
OVER SHEATHING, 5'8" SHEET ROCK, FOAM INSULATION,
TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION: SAND FINISH STUCCO
AND A TYPICAL FRAMED WALL, AS SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER.

SEE DETAIL 1 THROUGH 4 ON A9.2
REAR ELEVATION "C"
STREET ELEVATION "C"
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION "C" RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION "C"
6 6 6
6 6 SOLAR LOCATED ON ROOF

FINISHED FLOOR
100'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
125'-0"
389
SLOPE 1/2":12 SLOPE 1/2":12
- TEMPERED GLASS
1 2-10 6-10
- SC - TEMPERED GLASS
- SWINGING
2 2-6 6-10 (X2)
- SC - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLDR
3 4-0 5-0
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
4 2-10 5-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
5 4-0 6-0
- METAL -STEEL GATE
13 3-0 4-10
- SWINGING - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
6 4-0 3-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
7 2-0 4-0
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
8 1-2 1-2
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
9 1-6 2-8
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
10 2-4 2-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
11 2-4 2-4
- METAL
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
6'-10"
2'-10"
6'-10"
5'-0"
- SWINGING
5'-0"
4'-0" 2'-4"
2'-4"
2'-4"
3'-0"
4'-10"
2'-4"
1'-6"
2'-8"
1'-2"
EQ
4'-0"
2'-0"
4'-0"
3'-4"
6'-0"
4'-0"
2'-10"
5'-4"
1'-9"
1'-6"
2'-10"
3'-5"
4'-10"
5'-8"
4'-2"
4'-6"
5'-10"

2. AS SET FORTH IN THE ADOPTED IRC AND/ALL CC&RS
PROVIDE SAFETY GLAZING IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: SECTION 308.4.1 TO R308.4.7. IRC. WINDOWS IN ALL SLEEPING AREAS SHALL MEET EGRS REQUIRED A) SLIDING OR SWINGING DOORS EXCEPT JALOUSIES.

B) TUB AND OR SHOWER ENCLOSURE AND
GLAZING IN THE WALLS LESS THAN 60” ABOVE THE STANDING SURFACES OF TUBS OR SHOWERS.

C) GLAZING IN FIXED AND SLIDING PANELS OF SLIDING DOOR ASSEMBLIES AND PANELS IN SLIDING AND BI -FOLD CLOSET DOOR ASSEMBLIES.

D) GLAZING IN DOORS AND ENCLOSURES
FOR HOT TUBS, WHIRLPOOLS, SAUNAS, STEAM ROOMS, BATHTUBS AND SHOWERS. GLAZING IN

ANY PART OF A BUILDING WALL ENCLOSING THESE COMPARTMENTS WHERE THE BOTTOM EXPOSED EDGE OF THE GLAZING IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES MEASURED HORIZONTALLY AND

VERTICALLY AND IN STRAIGHT LINE, FROM THE WATER EDGE AT ANY STANDING OR WALKING SURFACE.

1. EXTERIOR DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULE

ALL GLAZING TO BE INSTALLED IN COMPLIANCE AND AS SPECIFIED WITH

THE APPROVED IECC REPORT AS SUBMITTED AND APPROVED WITH THIS

3. ALL GLAZING TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS

THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN CONCERT WITH THE SUPPLIER TO SUPPLY

4. ALL CUT SHEETS AND ROUGH OPENING SIZES TO THE FRAMING CONTRACTOR

THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND PERMIT

PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ALL WORK TO BE PREFORMED
F.F. ELEV. = 0'-0"
(1 CONT.)

E) GLAZING IN AN INDIVIDUAL FIXED OR OPERABLE PANEL ADJACENT TO A DOOR WHERE THE NEAREST VERTICAL EDGE OF THE GLAZING IS WITHIN A 24 INCHES ARC OF BOTH VERTICAL EDGE OF THE DOOR IN A CLOSE POSITION AND WHOSE BOTTOM EDGE IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR OR WALKING SURFACE.

F) GLAZING ADJACENT TO STAIRWAYS, LANDINGS AND RAMPS WITHIN 36 INCHES HORIZONTALLY OF A WALKING SURFACE WHEN THE EXPOSED SURFACE OF THE GLASS IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES ABOVE THE NOSE OF THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE.

G) GLAZING WITHIN 18” OF THE FLOOR, INDIVIDUAL PANEL GREATER THAN 9 SQUARE FEET. H) ALL GLAZING IN RAILINGS REGARDLESS OF AN AREA OR HEIGHT ABOVE A WALKING SURFACE.

INCLUDED ARE STRUCTURAL BALUSTERS PANELS AND NON -STRUCTURAL IN FILL PANELS.

TOP PLATE = 6'-10"
- TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
12 6-0 6-8
- METAL F
6'-0"
6'-8"
INSULATION @ R3.75 PER INCH, TO MAKE

CONDITIONED ATTIC SPACE

TYPICAL MFG TRUSS AND SHEATHING

REFER TO ENGINEERING
A TOTAL R VALUE OF 30.00 TO BOTTOM OF

ROOF SHEATHING
INSTALL 8" OF CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM
OR,
INSTALL R30 BATT INSULATION TO THE

BOTTOM OF ROOF SHEATHING

18. 19.

20. 21.

WHERE EVE VENTING OCCURS, FIRE BLOCK BELOW FASCIA @ STUD WALL AND LAY EVERY THIRD MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEEN HIGH AND LOW VENTS IS 3'-0" (MIN.).

ANY CHANGES IN THE ROOF SYSTEM (IE., SIZE, SHAPE, ETC. TO BE REPORTED IN WRITING TO NO CLOSER THAN 3'-0" TO THE EAVE
HIGH VENTS SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 1'-0" TO THE RIDGE AND LOW TILE VENTS SHALL BE TO ROOF CONNECTIONS, PAINT FLASHING TO MATCH.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

13. 14.

15. 16.

17. ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1'-0" FROM EDGE OF ROOF CRICKETS OR CANT

ON SITE VERIFICATION OF ALL CONDITIONS REQUIRED OF THE TRUSS SUPPLIER OR CONTRACTOR BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OR THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR.

OVER FRAMING TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FRAMING CONTRACTOR OR AS SPECIFIED INSTALLATION OF THE TRUSS SYSTEM, ON SITE FILLS , "CUT AND STACK" FRAMING AND ALL

PRIOR TO MANUFACTURING OF ANY TRUSSES OR COMPONENTS, THIS IS TO ENSURE PROPER SIZES QUANTITIES, SHAPES, SIZES, CONFIGURATIONS, ETC. OF ALL TRUSSES, HIP SETS, GABLE ENDS, "DREW-COAT" WATERPROOF DECKING MEMBRANE OVER O.S.B. FLOOR SHEATHING PROVIDE "DREW COAT" WATERPROOF DECKING MEMBRANE OVER THIS AREA OR EQUAL.

PROVIDE "BITHUTHENE 3000" WATERPROOF MEMBRANE AT ALL HORIZ. APPLICATIONS OF FIREPLACE. STACK LAP OVER SIDES MIN 6" ALL UNDER 20 GAL. G.I. CAP w/ MIN 2" LAP OVER SIDES. WELD ALL BREAKS IN PAN AND SLOPE TO DRAIN.

TO AVOID CONFLICTS.

ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BETWEEN TRADES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION STRIPS (TYPICAL).

APPORIATE BRACING PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY

ROOF TRUSS SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS USING ALL

REGARDING THE ACCOMMODATION OF THE INSTALLATION OF THE HEATING VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC) SYSTEM AND ITS' COMPONENTS.

TRUSS SUPPLIER TO ENSURE THAT ALL TRUSSES CONFORM TO ANY AND ALL SPECIFICATIONS

TRUSS SUPPLIER TO ENSURE THAT ALL TRUSSES CONFORM TO ANY AND ALL SPECIFICATIONS OF FRAMING CONTRACTOR TO USE SIMPSON HURRICANE CLIPS 2.5 OR BETTER AT THE END OF

ALL TRUSSES OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OR TRUSS SUPPLIER

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

INSTALLATION.

ROOFING SUB CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL FLASHING THROUGHOUT AND PROVIDE

PROVIDE LEAD FLASHING AT PROTRUDING PIPES THROUGH ROOF AND AT CURVED WALL

ROOF IS TO BE FLASHED AND COUNTER FLASHED AT WALLS, VALLEYS, PENETRATIONS, AND PROVIDE ALL BLOCKING AND FIRE STOPS AS REQUIRED.

ALL APPROPRIATE AREAS.

SEE STRUCT'L GENERAL NOTES FOR ROOF SHEATHING.

DASHED LINES DENOTE WALLS BELOW THE ROOF FRAMING.

BLOCKING AND ALL OTHER ROOF SYSTEM COMPONENTS ARE ASSUMED TO BE SUPPLIED IN THE "TRUSS PACKAGE" BY THE TRUSS MANUFACTURER.

AND QUANTITIES

THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PERTAINING TO DRAG TRUSSES, SHEAR TRUSSES, ETC

THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IMMEDIATELY
VENT BLOCK HORIZ. w/ BAFFLE AT INSULATION.

ROOF FRAMING (TRUSS) NOTES
BASIS FOR DESIGN:

ROOF TO BE UNVENTED AS ALLOWED PER IRC 806.5 WITH ALL CONDITIONS

ROOF VENTILATION DESIGN
MET AND/OR EXCEEDED. REFER TO DETAIL F ABOVE
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A5.3ROOF PLAN "C" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA ROOF PLAN "C"
390
D
W
D
W
FIRST FLOOR PLAN "F" UPPER FLOOR PLAN "F"
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 6.0 FLOORPLAN "F" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA

FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES
SHOWER TUB COMBO, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

TYPICAL RECESSED MEDICINE CABINET. SEE GC/OWNER
36" HIGH CAB, SEE GC/ OWNER AGENT FOR SPECS.

TYPICAL MIRROR. SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT DIMENSIONS.

WASHER, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

RECESSED WATER VALVE BOX.

LAUNDRY ROOM
WALL MOUNTED SHOWER HEAD AT 72" A.F.F.

TOILET, SEE GC/OWNER AGENT FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

SINK, SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

BATHROOM
SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT STLYE, MATERIAL AND COLOR.

COUNTER TOP @ 36" A.F.F. SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT

WALL MOUNTED UPPER CABINETS, SEE GC/OWNER FOR
RANGE/OVEN COMBO, SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

DISHWASHER SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER

GARBAGE DISPOSAL AT SINK SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER 36" BASE CABINETS SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT LAYOUT, MFG

REFRIGERATOR SPACE, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT DIMENSIONS

KITCHEN AND BAR
COUNTER TOP AT 30" A.F.F. W/ KNEE SPACE (WHERE OCCURS)
WHERE IS SHOWN PROVIDE 50CFM INTERMITTENT EXHAUST FAN.

AND ANY ADOPTED LOCAL AMENDMENTS.

THERE SHALL BE A FLOOR OR LANDING AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM

TYPICAL CONCRETE LANDING AT EXTERIOR DOOR SHALL NOT
PROVIDE HOSE-BIBB W/RECESSES BRADLEY 7910 HOSE BOX OR EQUAL GAS FIRED ON DEMAND WATER HEATER, #GT15-240NI
ELECTRICAL MAIN PANEL. SEE ELEC LOAD CALCS.

PER M1502.4.1, INSTALL DRYER MOISTURE EXHAUST DUCT SYSTEM F.A.U. SEE MECH FOR DETAILS PROVIDED THE DOOR DOES NOT SWING OVER THE LANDING. MIN EXT. DOOR SERVED. LANDING SHALL BE MIN 36" IN DIRECTION OF SLOPE SLAB/DECK 1/4" PER 1'-0" AWAY FROM STRUCTURE
TO ME DRYER VENT PRESSURE DROP CALCULATION FOR COMPLIANCE.

DIRECT VENT RANGE HOOD/MICROWAVE COMBO. SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR (MAX 14' IN LENGTH-INCLUDING (2) NINETY DEGREE ELBOWS. REFER OF EACH STAIRWAY. ALL LANDINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
IRC CODE AND ANY ADOPTED LOCAL AMENDMENTS.

ALL STAIRWAYS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT IRC CODE
NOT BE MORE THAN 8" BELOW THE TOP OF THE THRESHOLD,

WIDTH OF LANDING SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL. LINE OF THE FLOOR ABOVE/RAILING.

NOT IN USE

EXACT LAYOUT, MFG, MODEL AND COLOR

MODEL AND COLOR
STYLE, MATERIAL AND COLOR..

COUNTER TOP 18" WIDE @ 44" A.F.F. OVER 6" PONY WALL
SPECS. INSTALL PER MF'R SPECS, SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

PAPER HLDR, SEE BUILDER/OWNER AGENT FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

WHERE IS SHOWN, PROVIDE SMOKE & CARBON DETECTORS.

1. IN EACH SLEEPING ROOM
WILL ACTIVATE ALL ALARMS. THE ALARM SHALL BE CLEARLY AUDIBLE PER IRC, SECTION 313, 314.3

3. ON EACH ADDITIONAL FLOOR OF THE DWELLING.

BE WIRED IN A MANNER THAT IF THE ACTUATION OF ONE ALARM LOCATIONS:

2. OUTSIDE EACH SLEEPING ROOM IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF

OF THE BEDRROMS

WHEN ONE OR MORE DETECTOR IS TO BE INSTALLED ALL ARE TO IN ALL BR's OVER BACKGROUND NOISE WITH ALL DOORS CLOSED INSTALL DRYER BOX MODEL # BD480 OR EQUAL WITH OWNER APPROVAL

INSTALL KIDDE SMOKE/CO DUEL DETECTOR KNCOSMBA OR EQUAL

GENERAL NOTES

CLOSET BUILT-INS, SEE GC/ OWNER FOR LAYOUT, MATERIAL

AND FINISH
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 20
21 22
23 24
25 33
34 35
36 37
39 51
52 53
54 55
56 60
61 80
81 82
83 38
A.O. SMITH SIGNATURE PREMIRE 6.6 GPM 160,000 BTU NATURAL GAS

OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE MECHANICAL ENGINEER

TANKLESS WATER HEATER

SUPPLIER TO FURNISH AND MAKE AVAILABLE FOR ALL INSPECTIONS

INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS AND OPERATOR/OWNER MANUALS

SINK SIZE, MATERIAL SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER

7. EACH PIECE OF SHEATHING (OSB OR PLYWOOD) SHALL BEAR THE GRADE OF THE

WAS GRADED

8. ALL WOOD CONNECTORS HOLES SHALL BE FILLED WITH NAILS PER THE MFG

2. ALL WOOD IN CONTACT WITHIN OF CONCRETE SHALL BE RWD OR PRESSURE TREATED

1. ALL WOOD SHALL BE AT 19% OR LESS MOISTURE CONTENT PRIOR TO COVERING

AND TRADEMARK OF THE GRADING AGENCY UNDER WHOSE RULES THE MEMBER

SHEET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APA GRADING RULES

5. EACH PIECE OF WOOD FRAMING SHALL BEAR THE GRADE OF THE WOOD SPECIES NATURAL RESISTANCE TO DECAY SUCH AS REDWOOD OR CEDAR 3. ALL WOOD EXPOSED TO WEATHER SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED OR WOOD OF

GENERAL FRAMING NOTES

4. PRESSURE TREATED WOOD SHALL NOT CONTAIN EITHER CHROMIUM OR ARSENIC

INSTRUCTIONS AND THE ENGINEERS SPECIFICATIONS

9. ALL FASTENERS (NAILS, SCREWS, HOLD-DOWNS, STRAPS, ANCHOR BOLTS, ETC.) USED TO CONNECT PRESSURE TREATED WOOD SHALL BE CORROSION RESISTANT

GALVANIZED OR STAINLESS STEEL FASTENERS

10. ADHESIVES OR EPOXY ANCHORS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE MFG INSTRUCTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDING, BUY NOT LIMITED TO, INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE

HOLE SIZES, HOLE CLEANING , TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY AND SETTING WORKING TIMES

11.FRAMING (SUB) CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL FINISHED CONCRETE AREAS FROM DAMAGE WITH MIN 1/2" GYPSUM (OR EQUAL) INSTALLED HORIZONTAL OVER THOSE AREAS

12. WHEN POSSIBLE NO PINS, SHOTS, TEMPORARY NAILS TO BE EMBEDDED INTO CONCRETE SURFACE

THAT IS DEEMED TO BE A FINISHED OR EXPOSED AREA

13. USE NOTED DIMENSIONS RATHER THAN 'SCALED' DIMENSIONS

14. IF DIMENSION DISCREPANCIES ARISE CONTACT THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IMMEDIATELY FOR CLARIFICATION

15. DIMENSIONS NOTED ARE FACE OF STUD EXTERIOR, FINISHED (AFTER 5/8" SHEET ROCK) INTERIOR INSTALLED BELOW 60" FROM FINISHED GRADE

NOT IN USE
DRYER, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

NOT IN USE

NOT IN USE

BEDROOM

CLOS BAR
GARAGE
BATH
GARAGE
BATH
BAR

BEDROOM
DINING
CLOS
7 7
13 13
13 15 15
51 51
52 52
53 53
54 54
55 55
56 56
60 61 61 60
80 80
81 81
82 82
83 83
A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
2 A9.1
2 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
1 A9.1
4 A9.1
4 A9.1
1 A9.1
5 A9.1
5 A9.1
7 A9.1
8 A9.1
7 A9.1
8 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
6 A9.1
6 1 2-10 6-10 4 2-10 5-4 4 2-10 5-4 7 2-0 4-0 7 2-0 4-0 4 2-10 5-4 4 2-10 5-4 1 2-10 6-10 11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4 11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4
1 2-10 6-10
1 2-10 6-10
12 6-0 6-8 12 6-0 6-8
2 2-6 6-10 (X2) 9 1-6 2-8 (X2) 9 1-6 2-8 (X2)
3 4-0 5-0 3 4-0 5-0
10 2-4 2-4
7 2-0 4-0
4 2-10 5-4
7 2-0 4-0
4 2-10 5-4
4 2-10 5-4
7 2-0 4-0
4 2-10 5-4
7 2-0 4-0
9 1-6 2-8 (X3) 9 1-6 2-8 (X3)
BATH
CL

KITCHEN
BATH
BATH

LIVING LIVING
LOFT

BEDROOM BEDROOM

BEDROOM
CL
CL

KITCHEN
DINING
15 15
20 20
23 23
22 22 22 22 24 24
33 33
34 34
35 35
37 37 39
39 51
51 38 38
52 53
53 54
54 55
55 55
56 56
56 60
60 61
61 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
5 A9.1
5 A9.1
12 A9.1
12 A9.1
13 A9.1
13 A9.1
14 A9.1
14 A9.1
6 A9.1
6 A9.1
6 15
51 WH 2 WH 2
15 CL
53 54 54
54 53
51 54
52 52
52 52

BATH BATH
55 60 61
56 60
61 6 6
16 16
16 DECORATIVE SHROUD
17 ELECTRICAL PANEL TO BE FED BY SOLAR SOLUTION
17 TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
UNIT A
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF

UNIT B UNIT A UNIT B
TOTAL: 1481 SF
SF LIVING: 1062 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
TOTAL: 1459 SF
SF LIVING: 1040 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
391
D
W
D
W

BEDROOM
CLOS
BAR
GARAGE
BATH
GARAGE
BATH
BAR

BEDROOM
WH
PWDR
BATH
DINING

LIVING LIVING
LOFT

BEDROOM

BEDROOM

BEDROOM
PWDR
CL
CL
23'-6"
35'-6"
20'-0 1/2" 20'-0 1/2" 20'-0"
40'-11 1/2"
43'-0"
51'-0"

KITCHEN

KITCHEN
CL
BATH
DINING
CLOS
8'-0" 4'-0"
4'-10" 41'-4" 4'-10"
4'-0" 8'-0" 23'-6"
4'-6 1/2" 4'-4" 4'-4" 10'-3 1/2"
51'-0"
25'-6" 25'-6"
2'-0 1/2" 7'-0 1/2" 9'-3" 4'-4" 2'-10" 2'-10" 4'-4" 9'-3 3/4" 6'-11 3/4" 2'-0 1/2" 10'-3 1/2" 4'-4" 4'-4" 4'-6 1/2"
10'-7 1/2" 10'-0 1/2" 10'-0 1/2" 10'-7 1/2"
7'-1 1/4" 2'-3" 4'-11 3/4"
3'-3"
6'-10" 12'-4" 5'-0" 5'-0" 12'-4" 6'-10"5'-5 3/4" 2'-3 1/4" 6'-9" 2'-1 1/4" 4'-9"
3'-5" 3'-3" 3'-4"
3'-7"
3'-3"
8'-6"
10'-9"
11'-1"
6'-0" 13'-2" 6'-4" 13'-2" 5'-8"
25'-6" 25'-2"
50'-8"
6'-4"
7'-6 1/4" 7'-11 3/4" 8'-1 1/4" 7'-0"
36'-0"
18'-7 1/2"
3'-4 1/4"
17'-4 1/4" 4'-11 3/4"
2'-10" 4'-1" 9'-2 1/4" 1'-3" 6'-3 1/4"
4'-10" 5'-0" 1'-9 1/4" 4'-11 3/4" 4'-11 1/4" 1'-9 1/4" 2'-2 1/2" 4'-0" 4'-6 1/2" 12'-1 1/2" 4'-10" 25'-6" 25'-6"
51'-0"
35'-6"
24'-10"
9'-8" 8'-4"
7'-11"
12'-0"
5'-4"
10'-8"
8'-3"
14'-4"
4'-10"
13'-2"
4'-7 3/4"
7'-11" 11'-9"
12'-8"
11'-8 1/4"
8'-11 1/2"
9'-11"
6'-11 1/2"
10'-5"
11'-8"
8'-5 1/4"
4'-5"
7'-0 1/4" 3'-8 3/4" 3'-7 3/4" 11'-10 1/4"
WH
3'-10"
3'-5" 3'-8 1/4"
3'-3"
8'-11" 3'-5" 5'-0" 2'-11 3/4"5'-0" 3'-5" 8'-11"
5'-8"
5'-7 1/2"
5'-1 1/2"
7'-11"
2'-11 3/4"
24'-10"
1'-6" 1'-6"
2'-7"
3'-9" 4'-8"
8'-10 1/4"
3'-9"
4'-8"
7'-8 3/4"
5'-0"
6'-7 3/4"
14'-8" 5'-0"
2'-0"
11'-9"
CL
BATH
11'-8 1/4"
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 6.1 DIM FLOOR PLAN "F" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA 6'-2 3/4" 4'-6"
2'-3 1/2"
3'-11" 3'-3"
3'-6"
7'-11"
5'-0"
3'-3"
6'-6"
6'-3"
8'-0 1/4"
12'-4"
2'-2 1/4" 2'-10 1/2" 7'-0"
2'-6"
1'-6" 1'-6"
1'-1"
4'-5 3/4"
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 D
A9.0 E
A9.0 D A9.0 E
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 D
A9.0 E
A9.0 D A9.0 E
9'-0 1/2"
12'-4 3/4"
FIRST FLOOR PLAN "F" UPPER FLOOR PLAN "F"
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
UNIT A
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF

UNIT B UNIT A UNIT B
TOTAL: 1481 SF
SF LIVING: 1062 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
TOTAL: 1459 SF
SF LIVING: 1040 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
392
4 12 4 12
1 5 3 3 3 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 4 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 4 3 3 3 5 1
1 3 3 3 3 3 4 2 3 5 1 1 5 3 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 1
1 5 3 3 3 4 4 4
3 2 2 3
2 2
3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 1
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 6.2 ELEVATIONS "F" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
25'-0"

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
25'-0"
1 FINISHED GRADE
2 FASCIA, ACCENT COLOR AS SPCIFIED
3 BODY COLOR AS SPECIFIED
4 ASPHALT ROOF ROOFING, COLOR AS SPECIFIED
5 PORCELAIN TILE AS SPECIFIED

KEYNOTES
NOTE: ALL WINDOW AND DOORS TO BE WHITE VINYL

NOT LABELED FOR CLARITY
NOTE: FOR COLOR SPECIFICATIONS AND SCEDULE
REFER TO SHEET A 1.2 FOR COLOR PALETTE
TYP. SLAB ON FINISHED GRADE CONSTRUCTION
OVER 30# FELT PAPER, ROOF SHEATHING, AND PRE MFG TRUSS SYSTEM.

SEE DETAIL 19 ON A9.2
OVER SHEATHING, 5'8" SHEET ROCK, FOAM INSULATION,
TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION: SAND FINISH STUCCO
AND A TYPICAL FRAMED WALL, AS SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER.

SEE DETAIL 1 THROUGH 4 ON A9.2
REAR ELEVATION "F"
STREET ELEVATION "F"
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION "F" RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION "F"
6 6 6
6 6 SOLAR LOCATED ON ROOF

FINISHED FLOOR
100'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
125'-0"
393
SLOPE 1/2":12 SLOPE 1/2":12
- TEMPERED GLASS
1 2-10 6-10
- SC - TEMPERED GLASS
- SWINGING
2 2-6 6-10 (X2)
- SC - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLDR
3 4-0 5-0
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
4 2-10 5-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
5 4-0 6-0
- METAL -STEEL GATE
13 3-0 4-10
- SWINGING - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
6 4-0 3-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
7 2-0 4-0
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
8 1-2 1-2
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
9 1-6 2-8
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
10 2-4 2-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
11 2-4 2-4
- METAL
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
6'-10"
2'-10"
6'-10"
5'-0"
- SWINGING
5'-0"
4'-0" 2'-4"
2'-4"
2'-4"
3'-0"
4'-10"
2'-4"
1'-6"
2'-8"
1'-2"
EQ
4'-0"
2'-0"
4'-0"
3'-4"
6'-0"
4'-0"
2'-10"
5'-4"
1'-9"
1'-6"
2'-10"
3'-5"
4'-10"
5'-8"
4'-2"
4'-6"
5'-10"

2. AS SET FORTH IN THE ADOPTED IRC AND/ALL CC&RS
PROVIDE SAFETY GLAZING IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: SECTION 308.4.1 TO R308.4.7. IRC. WINDOWS IN ALL SLEEPING AREAS SHALL MEET EGRS REQUIRED A) SLIDING OR SWINGING DOORS EXCEPT JALOUSIES.

B) TUB AND OR SHOWER ENCLOSURE AND
GLAZING IN THE WALLS LESS THAN 60” ABOVE THE STANDING SURFACES OF TUBS OR SHOWERS.

C) GLAZING IN FIXED AND SLIDING PANELS OF SLIDING DOOR ASSEMBLIES AND PANELS IN SLIDING AND BI -FOLD CLOSET DOOR ASSEMBLIES.

D) GLAZING IN DOORS AND ENCLOSURES
FOR HOT TUBS, WHIRLPOOLS, SAUNAS, STEAM ROOMS, BATHTUBS AND SHOWERS. GLAZING IN

ANY PART OF A BUILDING WALL ENCLOSING THESE COMPARTMENTS WHERE THE BOTTOM EXPOSED EDGE OF THE GLAZING IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES MEASURED HORIZONTALLY AND

VERTICALLY AND IN STRAIGHT LINE, FROM THE WATER EDGE AT ANY STANDING OR WALKING SURFACE.

1. EXTERIOR DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULE

ALL GLAZING TO BE INSTALLED IN COMPLIANCE AND AS SPECIFIED WITH

THE APPROVED IECC REPORT AS SUBMITTED AND APPROVED WITH THIS

3. ALL GLAZING TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS

THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN CONCERT WITH THE SUPPLIER TO SUPPLY

4. ALL CUT SHEETS AND ROUGH OPENING SIZES TO THE FRAMING CONTRACTOR

THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND PERMIT

PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ALL WORK TO BE PREFORMED
F.F. ELEV. = 0'-0"
(1 CONT.)

E) GLAZING IN AN INDIVIDUAL FIXED OR OPERABLE PANEL ADJACENT TO A DOOR WHERE THE NEAREST VERTICAL EDGE OF THE GLAZING IS WITHIN A 24 INCHES ARC OF BOTH VERTICAL EDGE OF THE DOOR IN A CLOSE POSITION AND WHOSE BOTTOM EDGE IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR OR WALKING SURFACE.

F) GLAZING ADJACENT TO STAIRWAYS, LANDINGS AND RAMPS WITHIN 36 INCHES HORIZONTALLY OF A WALKING SURFACE WHEN THE EXPOSED SURFACE OF THE GLASS IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES ABOVE THE NOSE OF THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE.

G) GLAZING WITHIN 18” OF THE FLOOR, INDIVIDUAL PANEL GREATER THAN 9 SQUARE FEET. H) ALL GLAZING IN RAILINGS REGARDLESS OF AN AREA OR HEIGHT ABOVE A WALKING SURFACE.

INCLUDED ARE STRUCTURAL BALUSTERS PANELS AND NON -STRUCTURAL IN FILL PANELS.

TOP PLATE = 6'-10"
- TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
12 6-0 6-8
- METAL F
6'-0"
6'-8"
INSULATION @ R3.75 PER INCH, TO MAKE

CONDITIONED ATTIC SPACE

TYPICAL MFG TRUSS AND SHEATHING

REFER TO ENGINEERING
A TOTAL R VALUE OF 30.00 TO BOTTOM OF

ROOF SHEATHING
INSTALL 8" OF CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM
OR,
INSTALL R30 BATT INSULATION TO THE

BOTTOM OF ROOF SHEATHING

18. 19.

20. 21.

WHERE EVE VENTING OCCURS, FIRE BLOCK BELOW FASCIA @ STUD WALL AND LAY EVERY THIRD MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEEN HIGH AND LOW VENTS IS 3'-0" (MIN.).

ANY CHANGES IN THE ROOF SYSTEM (IE., SIZE, SHAPE, ETC. TO BE REPORTED IN WRITING TO NO CLOSER THAN 3'-0" TO THE EAVE
HIGH VENTS SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 1'-0" TO THE RIDGE AND LOW TILE VENTS SHALL BE TO ROOF CONNECTIONS, PAINT FLASHING TO MATCH.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

13. 14.

15. 16.

17. ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1'-0" FROM EDGE OF ROOF CRICKETS OR CANT

ON SITE VERIFICATION OF ALL CONDITIONS REQUIRED OF THE TRUSS SUPPLIER OR CONTRACTOR BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OR THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR.

OVER FRAMING TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FRAMING CONTRACTOR OR AS SPECIFIED INSTALLATION OF THE TRUSS SYSTEM, ON SITE FILLS , "CUT AND STACK" FRAMING AND ALL

PRIOR TO MANUFACTURING OF ANY TRUSSES OR COMPONENTS, THIS IS TO ENSURE PROPER SIZES QUANTITIES, SHAPES, SIZES, CONFIGURATIONS, ETC. OF ALL TRUSSES, HIP SETS, GABLE ENDS, "DREW-COAT" WATERPROOF DECKING MEMBRANE OVER O.S.B. FLOOR SHEATHING PROVIDE "DREW COAT" WATERPROOF DECKING MEMBRANE OVER THIS AREA OR EQUAL.

PROVIDE "BITHUTHENE 3000" WATERPROOF MEMBRANE AT ALL HORIZ. APPLICATIONS OF FIREPLACE. STACK LAP OVER SIDES MIN 6" ALL UNDER 20 GAL. G.I. CAP w/ MIN 2" LAP OVER SIDES. WELD ALL BREAKS IN PAN AND SLOPE TO DRAIN.

TO AVOID CONFLICTS.

ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BETWEEN TRADES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION STRIPS (TYPICAL).

APPORIATE BRACING PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY

ROOF TRUSS SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS USING ALL

REGARDING THE ACCOMMODATION OF THE INSTALLATION OF THE HEATING VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC) SYSTEM AND ITS' COMPONENTS.

TRUSS SUPPLIER TO ENSURE THAT ALL TRUSSES CONFORM TO ANY AND ALL SPECIFICATIONS

TRUSS SUPPLIER TO ENSURE THAT ALL TRUSSES CONFORM TO ANY AND ALL SPECIFICATIONS OF FRAMING CONTRACTOR TO USE SIMPSON HURRICANE CLIPS 2.5 OR BETTER AT THE END OF

ALL TRUSSES OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OR TRUSS SUPPLIER

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

INSTALLATION.

ROOFING SUB CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL FLASHING THROUGHOUT AND PROVIDE

PROVIDE LEAD FLASHING AT PROTRUDING PIPES THROUGH ROOF AND AT CURVED WALL

ROOF IS TO BE FLASHED AND COUNTER FLASHED AT WALLS, VALLEYS, PENETRATIONS, AND PROVIDE ALL BLOCKING AND FIRE STOPS AS REQUIRED.

ALL APPROPRIATE AREAS.

SEE STRUCT'L GENERAL NOTES FOR ROOF SHEATHING.

DASHED LINES DENOTE WALLS BELOW THE ROOF FRAMING.

BLOCKING AND ALL OTHER ROOF SYSTEM COMPONENTS ARE ASSUMED TO BE SUPPLIED IN THE "TRUSS PACKAGE" BY THE TRUSS MANUFACTURER.

AND QUANTITIES

THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PERTAINING TO DRAG TRUSSES, SHEAR TRUSSES, ETC

THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IMMEDIATELY
VENT BLOCK HORIZ. w/ BAFFLE AT INSULATION.

ROOF FRAMING (TRUSS) NOTES
BASIS FOR DESIGN:

ROOF TO BE UNVENTED AS ALLOWED PER IRC 806.5 WITH ALL CONDITIONS

ROOF VENTILATION DESIGN
MET AND/OR EXCEEDED. REFER TO DETAIL F ABOVE
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 6.3 ROOF PLAN "F" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA ROOF PLAN "F"
394
D
W
D
W
FIRST FLOOR PLAN "B" UPPER FLOOR PLAN "B"
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 7.0 FLOORPLAN "B" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA

FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES
SHOWER TUB COMBO, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

TYPICAL RECESSED MEDICINE CABINET. SEE GC/OWNER
36" HIGH CAB, SEE GC/ OWNER AGENT FOR SPECS.

TYPICAL MIRROR. SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT DIMENSIONS.

WASHER, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

RECESSED WATER VALVE BOX.

LAUNDRY ROOM
WALL MOUNTED SHOWER HEAD AT 72" A.F.F.

TOILET, SEE GC/OWNER AGENT FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

SINK, SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

BATHROOM
SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT STLYE, MATERIAL AND COLOR.

COUNTER TOP @ 36" A.F.F. SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT

WALL MOUNTED UPPER CABINETS, SEE GC/OWNER FOR
RANGE/OVEN COMBO, SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

DISHWASHER SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER

GARBAGE DISPOSAL AT SINK SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER 36" BASE CABINETS SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT LAYOUT, MFG

REFRIGERATOR SPACE, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT DIMENSIONS

KITCHEN AND BAR
COUNTER TOP AT 30" A.F.F. W/ KNEE SPACE (WHERE OCCURS)
WHERE IS SHOWN PROVIDE 50CFM INTERMITTENT EXHAUST FAN.

AND ANY ADOPTED LOCAL AMENDMENTS.

THERE SHALL BE A FLOOR OR LANDING AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM

TYPICAL CONCRETE LANDING AT EXTERIOR DOOR SHALL NOT
PROVIDE HOSE-BIBB W/RECESSES BRADLEY 7910 HOSE BOX OR EQUAL GAS FIRED ON DEMAND WATER HEATER, #GT15-240NI
ELECTRICAL MAIN PANEL. SEE ELEC LOAD CALCS.

PER M1502.4.1, INSTALL DRYER MOISTURE EXHAUST DUCT SYSTEM F.A.U. SEE MECH FOR DETAILS PROVIDED THE DOOR DOES NOT SWING OVER THE LANDING. MIN EXT. DOOR SERVED. LANDING SHALL BE MIN 36" IN DIRECTION OF SLOPE SLAB/DECK 1/4" PER 1'-0" AWAY FROM STRUCTURE
TO ME DRYER VENT PRESSURE DROP CALCULATION FOR COMPLIANCE.

DIRECT VENT RANGE HOOD/MICROWAVE COMBO. SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR (MAX 14' IN LENGTH-INCLUDING (2) NINETY DEGREE ELBOWS. REFER OF EACH STAIRWAY. ALL LANDINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
IRC CODE AND ANY ADOPTED LOCAL AMENDMENTS.

ALL STAIRWAYS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT IRC CODE
NOT BE MORE THAN 8" BELOW THE TOP OF THE THRESHOLD,

WIDTH OF LANDING SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL. LINE OF THE FLOOR ABOVE/RAILING.

NOT IN USE

EXACT LAYOUT, MFG, MODEL AND COLOR

MODEL AND COLOR
STYLE, MATERIAL AND COLOR..

COUNTER TOP 18" WIDE @ 44" A.F.F. OVER 6" PONY WALL
SPECS. INSTALL PER MF'R SPECS, SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

PAPER HLDR, SEE BUILDER/OWNER AGENT FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

WHERE IS SHOWN, PROVIDE SMOKE & CARBON DETECTORS.

1. IN EACH SLEEPING ROOM
WILL ACTIVATE ALL ALARMS. THE ALARM SHALL BE CLEARLY AUDIBLE PER IRC, SECTION 313, 314.3

3. ON EACH ADDITIONAL FLOOR OF THE DWELLING.

BE WIRED IN A MANNER THAT IF THE ACTUATION OF ONE ALARM LOCATIONS:

2. OUTSIDE EACH SLEEPING ROOM IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF

OF THE BEDRROMS

WHEN ONE OR MORE DETECTOR IS TO BE INSTALLED ALL ARE TO IN ALL BR's OVER BACKGROUND NOISE WITH ALL DOORS CLOSED INSTALL DRYER BOX MODEL # BD480 OR EQUAL WITH OWNER APPROVAL

INSTALL KIDDE SMOKE/CO DUEL DETECTOR KNCOSMBA OR EQUAL

GENERAL NOTES

CLOSET BUILT-INS, SEE GC/ OWNER FOR LAYOUT, MATERIAL

AND FINISH
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 20
21 22
23 24
25 33
34 35
36 37
39 51
52 53
54 55
56 60
61 80
81 82
83 38
A.O. SMITH SIGNATURE PREMIRE 6.6 GPM 160,000 BTU NATURAL GAS

OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE MECHANICAL ENGINEER

TANKLESS WATER HEATER

SUPPLIER TO FURNISH AND MAKE AVAILABLE FOR ALL INSPECTIONS

INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS AND OPERATOR/OWNER MANUALS

SINK SIZE, MATERIAL SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER

7. EACH PIECE OF SHEATHING (OSB OR PLYWOOD) SHALL BEAR THE GRADE OF THE

WAS GRADED

8. ALL WOOD CONNECTORS HOLES SHALL BE FILLED WITH NAILS PER THE MFG

2. ALL WOOD IN CONTACT WITHIN OF CONCRETE SHALL BE RWD OR PRESSURE TREATED

1. ALL WOOD SHALL BE AT 19% OR LESS MOISTURE CONTENT PRIOR TO COVERING

AND TRADEMARK OF THE GRADING AGENCY UNDER WHOSE RULES THE MEMBER

SHEET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APA GRADING RULES

5. EACH PIECE OF WOOD FRAMING SHALL BEAR THE GRADE OF THE WOOD SPECIES NATURAL RESISTANCE TO DECAY SUCH AS REDWOOD OR CEDAR 3. ALL WOOD EXPOSED TO WEATHER SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED OR WOOD OF

GENERAL FRAMING NOTES

4. PRESSURE TREATED WOOD SHALL NOT CONTAIN EITHER CHROMIUM OR ARSENIC

INSTRUCTIONS AND THE ENGINEERS SPECIFICATIONS

9. ALL FASTENERS (NAILS, SCREWS, HOLD-DOWNS, STRAPS, ANCHOR BOLTS, ETC.) USED TO CONNECT PRESSURE TREATED WOOD SHALL BE CORROSION RESISTANT

GALVANIZED OR STAINLESS STEEL FASTENERS

10. ADHESIVES OR EPOXY ANCHORS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE MFG INSTRUCTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDING, BUY NOT LIMITED TO, INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE

HOLE SIZES, HOLE CLEANING , TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY AND SETTING WORKING TIMES

11.FRAMING (SUB) CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL FINISHED CONCRETE AREAS FROM DAMAGE WITH MIN 1/2" GYPSUM (OR EQUAL) INSTALLED HORIZONTAL OVER THOSE AREAS

12. WHEN POSSIBLE NO PINS, SHOTS, TEMPORARY NAILS TO BE EMBEDDED INTO CONCRETE SURFACE

THAT IS DEEMED TO BE A FINISHED OR EXPOSED AREA

13. USE NOTED DIMENSIONS RATHER THAN 'SCALED' DIMENSIONS

14. IF DIMENSION DISCREPANCIES ARISE CONTACT THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IMMEDIATELY FOR CLARIFICATION

15. DIMENSIONS NOTED ARE FACE OF STUD EXTERIOR, FINISHED (AFTER 5/8" SHEET ROCK) INTERIOR INSTALLED BELOW 60" FROM FINISHED GRADE

NOT IN USE
DRYER, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

NOT IN USE

NOT IN USE

BEDROOM

CLOS BAR
GARAGE
BATH
GARAGE
BATH
BAR

BEDROOM
DINING
CLOS
7 7
13 13
13 15 15
51 51
52 52
53 53
54 54
55 55
56 56
60 61 61 60
80 80
81 81
82 82
83 83
A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
2 A9.1
2 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
1 A9.1
4 A9.1
4 A9.1
1 A9.1
5 A9.1
5 A9.1
7 A9.1
8 A9.1
7 A9.1
8 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
6 A9.1
6 1 2-10 6-10 4 2-10 5-4 4 2-10 5-4 7 2-0 4-0 7 2-0 4-0 4 2-10 5-4 4 2-10 5-4 1 2-10 6-10 11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4 11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4
1 2-10 6-10
1 2-10 6-10
12 6-0 6-8 12 6-0 6-8
2 2-6 6-10 (X2) 9 1-6 2-8 (X2) 9 1-6 2-8 (X2)
3 4-0 5-0 3 4-0 5-0
10 2-4 2-4
7 2-0 4-0
4 2-10 5-4
7 2-0 4-0
4 2-10 5-4
4 2-10 5-4
7 2-0 4-0
4 2-10 5-4
7 2-0 4-0
9 1-6 2-8 (X3) 9 1-6 2-8 (X3)
BATH
CL

KITCHEN
BATH
BATH

LIVING LIVING
LOFT

BEDROOM BEDROOM

BEDROOM
CL
CL

KITCHEN
DINING
15 15
20 20
23 23
22 22 22
22 24 24
33 33
34 34
35 35
37 37
39 39
51 51
38 38
52 53
53 54
54 55
55 55
56 56
56 60
60 61
61 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
5 A9.1
5 A9.1
12 A9.1
12 A9.1
13 A9.1
13 A9.1
14 A9.1
14 A9.1
6 A9.1
6 A9.1
6 15
51 WH 2 WH 2
15 CL
53 54 54
54 53
51 54
52 52
52 52

BATH BATH
55 60 61
56 60
61 6 6
16 16
16 DECORATIVE SHROUD
17 ELECTRICAL PANEL TO BE FED BY SOLAR SOLUTION
17 TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
UNIT A
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF

UNIT B UNIT A UNIT B
TOTAL: 1481 SF
SF LIVING: 1062 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
TOTAL: 1442 SF
SF LIVING: 1023 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
395
D
W
D
W
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 7.1 DIM FLOOR PLAN "B" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 D
A9.0 E
A9.0 D A9.0 E
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 D
A9.0 E
A9.0 D A9.0 E

BEDROOM
CLOS
BAR
GARAGE
BATH
GARAGE
BATH
BAR

BEDROOM
WH
PWDR
BATH
DINING

LIVING LIVING
LOFT

BEDROOM

BEDROOM

BEDROOM
PWDR
CL
CL
23'-6"
35'-6"
20'-0 1/2" 20'-0 1/2" 20'-0"
40'-11 1/2"
43'-0"
51'-0"

KITCHEN

KITCHEN
CL
BATH
DINING
CLOS
8'-0" 4'-0"
4'-10" 41'-4" 4'-10"
4'-0" 8'-0" 23'-6"
4'-6 1/2" 4'-4" 4'-4" 10'-3 1/2"
51'-0"
25'-6" 25'-6"
2'-0 1/2" 7'-0 1/2" 9'-3" 4'-4" 2'-10" 2'-10" 4'-4" 9'-3 3/4" 6'-11 3/4" 2'-0 1/2" 10'-3 1/2" 4'-4" 4'-4" 4'-6 1/2"
10'-7 1/2" 10'-0 1/2" 10'-0 1/2" 10'-7 1/2"
7'-1 1/4" 2'-3" 4'-11 3/4"
3'-3"
6'-10" 12'-4" 5'-0" 5'-0" 12'-4" 6'-10"5'-5 3/4" 2'-3 1/4" 6'-9" 2'-1 1/4" 4'-9"
3'-5" 3'-3" 3'-4"
3'-7"
3'-3"
8'-6"
10'-9"
11'-1"
6'-0" 13'-2" 6'-4" 13'-2" 5'-8"
25'-6" 25'-2"
50'-8"
6'-4"
7'-6 1/4" 7'-11 3/4" 8'-1 1/4" 7'-0"
36'-0"
18'-7 1/2" 17'-4 1/4" 4'-11 3/4"
2'-10" 4'-1" 9'-2 1/4" 1'-3" 6'-2"
4'-10" 5'-0" 1'-9 1/4" 4'-11 3/4" 4'-11 1/4" 1'-9 1/4" 2'-2 1/2" 4'-0" 4'-6 1/2" 12'-1 1/2" 4'-10" 25'-6" 25'-6"
51'-0"
35'-6"
24'-10"
9'-8" 8'-4"
7'-11"
12'-0"
5'-4"
10'-8"
8'-3"
14'-4"
4'-10"
13'-2"
4'-7 3/4"
7'-11" 11'-9"
12'-8"
11'-8 1/4"
8'-11 1/2"
9'-11"
6'-11 1/2"
10'-5"
11'-8"
8'-5 1/4"
4'-5"
7'-0 1/4" 3'-8 3/4" 3'-7 3/4" 11'-10 1/4"
WH
3'-10"
3'-5" 3'-8 1/4"
3'-3"
8'-11" 3'-5" 5'-0" 2'-11 3/4"5'-0" 3'-5" 8'-11"
5'-8"
5'-7 1/2"
5'-1 1/2"
7'-11"
2'-11 3/4"
24'-10"
1'-6" 1'-6"
2'-7"
3'-9" 4'-8"
8'-10 1/4"
3'-9"
4'-8"
7'-8 3/4"
5'-0"
6'-7 3/4"
14'-8" 5'-0"
2'-0"
11'-9"
CL
BATH
11'-8 1/4"
6'-2 3/4" 4'-6"
2'-3 1/2"
3'-11" 3'-3"
3'-6"
7'-11"
5'-0"
3'-3"
6'-6"
6'-3"
8'-0 1/4"
12'-4"
2'-2 1/4" 2'-10 1/2" 7'-0"
2'-6"
1'-6" 1'-6"
1'-1"
4'-5 3/4"
12'-6"
12'-4 3/4"
FIRST FLOOR PLAN "B" UPPER FLOOR PLAN "B"
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
UNIT A
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF

UNIT B UNIT A UNIT B
TOTAL: 1481 SF
SF LIVING: 1062 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
TOTAL: 1442 SF
SF LIVING: 1023 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
396
4 12 4 12
1 5 3 3 3 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 4 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 4 3 3 3 5 1
1 3 3 3 3 3 4 2 3 5 1 1 5 3 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 1
1 5 3 3 3 4 4 4
3 2 2 3
2 2
3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 1
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 7.2 ELEVATIONS "B" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
25'-0"

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
25'-0"

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
25'-0"
1 FINISHED GRADE
2 FASCIA, ACCENT COLOR AS SPCIFIED
3 BODY COLOR AS SPECIFIED
4 ASPHALT ROOF ROOFING, COLOR AS SPECIFIED
5 PORCELAIN TILE AS SPECIFIED

KEYNOTES
NOTE: ALL WINDOW AND DOORS TO BE WHITE VINYL

NOT LABELED FOR CLARITY
NOTE: FOR COLOR SPECIFICATIONS AND SCEDULE
REFER TO SHEET A 1.2 FOR COLOR PALETTE
TYP. SLAB ON FINISHED GRADE CONSTRUCTION
OVER 30# FELT PAPER, ROOF SHEATHING, AND PRE MFG TRUSS SYSTEM.

SEE DETAIL 19 ON A9.2
OVER SHEATHING, 5'8" SHEET ROCK, FOAM INSULATION,
TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION: SAND FINISH STUCCO
AND A TYPICAL FRAMED WALL, AS SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER.

SEE DETAIL 1 THROUGH 4 ON A9.2
REAR ELEVATION "B"
STREET ELEVATION "B"
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION "B" RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION "B"
6 6 6
6 6 SOLAR LOCATED ON ROOF
397
SLOPE 1/2":12 SLOPE 1/2":12
- TEMPERED GLASS
1 2-10 6-10
- SC - TEMPERED GLASS
- SWINGING
2 2-6 6-10 (X2)
- SC - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLDR
3 4-0 5-0
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
4 2-10 5-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
5 4-0 6-0
- METAL -STEEL GATE
13 3-0 4-10
- SWINGING - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
6 4-0 3-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
7 2-0 4-0
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
8 1-2 1-2
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
9 1-6 2-8
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
10 2-4 2-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
11 2-4 2-4
- METAL
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
6'-10"
2'-10"
6'-10"
5'-0"
- SWINGING
5'-0"
4'-0" 2'-4"
2'-4"
2'-4"
3'-0"
4'-10"
2'-4"
1'-6"
2'-8"
1'-2"
EQ
4'-0"
2'-0"
4'-0"
3'-4"
6'-0"
4'-0"
2'-10"
5'-4"
1'-9"
1'-6"
2'-10"
3'-5"
4'-10"
5'-8"
4'-2"
4'-6"
5'-10"

2. AS SET FORTH IN THE ADOPTED IRC AND/ALL CC&RS
PROVIDE SAFETY GLAZING IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: SECTION 308.4.1 TO R308.4.7. IRC. WINDOWS IN ALL SLEEPING AREAS SHALL MEET EGRS REQUIRED A) SLIDING OR SWINGING DOORS EXCEPT JALOUSIES.

B) TUB AND OR SHOWER ENCLOSURE AND
GLAZING IN THE WALLS LESS THAN 60” ABOVE THE STANDING SURFACES OF TUBS OR SHOWERS.

C) GLAZING IN FIXED AND SLIDING PANELS OF SLIDING DOOR ASSEMBLIES AND PANELS IN SLIDING AND BI -FOLD CLOSET DOOR ASSEMBLIES.

D) GLAZING IN DOORS AND ENCLOSURES
FOR HOT TUBS, WHIRLPOOLS, SAUNAS, STEAM ROOMS, BATHTUBS AND SHOWERS. GLAZING IN

ANY PART OF A BUILDING WALL ENCLOSING THESE COMPARTMENTS WHERE THE BOTTOM EXPOSED EDGE OF THE GLAZING IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES MEASURED HORIZONTALLY AND

VERTICALLY AND IN STRAIGHT LINE, FROM THE WATER EDGE AT ANY STANDING OR WALKING SURFACE.

1. EXTERIOR DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULE

ALL GLAZING TO BE INSTALLED IN COMPLIANCE AND AS SPECIFIED WITH

THE APPROVED IECC REPORT AS SUBMITTED AND APPROVED WITH THIS

3. ALL GLAZING TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS

THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN CONCERT WITH THE SUPPLIER TO SUPPLY

4. ALL CUT SHEETS AND ROUGH OPENING SIZES TO THE FRAMING CONTRACTOR

THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND PERMIT

PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ALL WORK TO BE PREFORMED
F.F. ELEV. = 0'-0"
(1 CONT.)

E) GLAZING IN AN INDIVIDUAL FIXED OR OPERABLE PANEL ADJACENT TO A DOOR WHERE THE NEAREST VERTICAL EDGE OF THE GLAZING IS WITHIN A 24 INCHES ARC OF BOTH VERTICAL EDGE OF THE DOOR IN A CLOSE POSITION AND WHOSE BOTTOM EDGE IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR OR WALKING SURFACE.

F) GLAZING ADJACENT TO STAIRWAYS, LANDINGS AND RAMPS WITHIN 36 INCHES HORIZONTALLY OF A WALKING SURFACE WHEN THE EXPOSED SURFACE OF THE GLASS IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES ABOVE THE NOSE OF THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE.

G) GLAZING WITHIN 18” OF THE FLOOR, INDIVIDUAL PANEL GREATER THAN 9 SQUARE FEET. H) ALL GLAZING IN RAILINGS REGARDLESS OF AN AREA OR HEIGHT ABOVE A WALKING SURFACE.

INCLUDED ARE STRUCTURAL BALUSTERS PANELS AND NON -STRUCTURAL IN FILL PANELS.

TOP PLATE = 6'-10"
- TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
12 6-0 6-8
- METAL F
6'-0"
6'-8"
INSULATION @ R3.75 PER INCH, TO MAKE

CONDITIONED ATTIC SPACE

TYPICAL MFG TRUSS AND SHEATHING

REFER TO ENGINEERING
A TOTAL R VALUE OF 30.00 TO BOTTOM OF

ROOF SHEATHING
INSTALL 8" OF CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM
OR,
INSTALL R30 BATT INSULATION TO THE

BOTTOM OF ROOF SHEATHING

18. 19.

20. 21.

WHERE EVE VENTING OCCURS, FIRE BLOCK BELOW FASCIA @ STUD WALL AND LAY EVERY THIRD MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEEN HIGH AND LOW VENTS IS 3'-0" (MIN.).

ANY CHANGES IN THE ROOF SYSTEM (IE., SIZE, SHAPE, ETC. TO BE REPORTED IN WRITING TO NO CLOSER THAN 3'-0" TO THE EAVE
HIGH VENTS SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 1'-0" TO THE RIDGE AND LOW TILE VENTS SHALL BE TO ROOF CONNECTIONS, PAINT FLASHING TO MATCH.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

13. 14.

15. 16.

17. ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1'-0" FROM EDGE OF ROOF CRICKETS OR CANT

ON SITE VERIFICATION OF ALL CONDITIONS REQUIRED OF THE TRUSS SUPPLIER OR CONTRACTOR BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OR THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR.

OVER FRAMING TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FRAMING CONTRACTOR OR AS SPECIFIED INSTALLATION OF THE TRUSS SYSTEM, ON SITE FILLS , "CUT AND STACK" FRAMING AND ALL

PRIOR TO MANUFACTURING OF ANY TRUSSES OR COMPONENTS, THIS IS TO ENSURE PROPER SIZES QUANTITIES, SHAPES, SIZES, CONFIGURATIONS, ETC. OF ALL TRUSSES, HIP SETS, GABLE ENDS, "DREW-COAT" WATERPROOF DECKING MEMBRANE OVER O.S.B. FLOOR SHEATHING PROVIDE "DREW COAT" WATERPROOF DECKING MEMBRANE OVER THIS AREA OR EQUAL.

PROVIDE "BITHUTHENE 3000" WATERPROOF MEMBRANE AT ALL HORIZ. APPLICATIONS OF FIREPLACE. STACK LAP OVER SIDES MIN 6" ALL UNDER 20 GAL. G.I. CAP w/ MIN 2" LAP OVER SIDES. WELD ALL BREAKS IN PAN AND SLOPE TO DRAIN.

TO AVOID CONFLICTS.

ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BETWEEN TRADES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION STRIPS (TYPICAL).

APPORIATE BRACING PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY

ROOF TRUSS SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS USING ALL

REGARDING THE ACCOMMODATION OF THE INSTALLATION OF THE HEATING VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC) SYSTEM AND ITS' COMPONENTS.

TRUSS SUPPLIER TO ENSURE THAT ALL TRUSSES CONFORM TO ANY AND ALL SPECIFICATIONS

TRUSS SUPPLIER TO ENSURE THAT ALL TRUSSES CONFORM TO ANY AND ALL SPECIFICATIONS OF FRAMING CONTRACTOR TO USE SIMPSON HURRICANE CLIPS 2.5 OR BETTER AT THE END OF

ALL TRUSSES OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OR TRUSS SUPPLIER

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

INSTALLATION.

ROOFING SUB CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL FLASHING THROUGHOUT AND PROVIDE

PROVIDE LEAD FLASHING AT PROTRUDING PIPES THROUGH ROOF AND AT CURVED WALL

ROOF IS TO BE FLASHED AND COUNTER FLASHED AT WALLS, VALLEYS, PENETRATIONS, AND PROVIDE ALL BLOCKING AND FIRE STOPS AS REQUIRED.

ALL APPROPRIATE AREAS.

SEE STRUCT'L GENERAL NOTES FOR ROOF SHEATHING.

DASHED LINES DENOTE WALLS BELOW THE ROOF FRAMING.

BLOCKING AND ALL OTHER ROOF SYSTEM COMPONENTS ARE ASSUMED TO BE SUPPLIED IN THE "TRUSS PACKAGE" BY THE TRUSS MANUFACTURER.

AND QUANTITIES

THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PERTAINING TO DRAG TRUSSES, SHEAR TRUSSES, ETC

THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IMMEDIATELY
VENT BLOCK HORIZ. w/ BAFFLE AT INSULATION.

ROOF FRAMING (TRUSS) NOTES
BASIS FOR DESIGN:

ROOF TO BE UNVENTED AS ALLOWED PER IRC 806.5 WITH ALL CONDITIONS

ROOF VENTILATION DESIGN
MET AND/OR EXCEEDED. REFER TO DETAIL F ABOVE
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
ROOF PLAN "B" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA A 7.3
ROOF PLAN "B"
398
D
W
D
W
FIRST FLOOR PLAN "D" UPPER FLOOR PLAN "D"
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 8.0 FLOORPLAN 'B' RIGHT SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA

FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES
SHOWER TUB COMBO, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

TYPICAL RECESSED MEDICINE CABINET. SEE GC/OWNER
36" HIGH CAB, SEE GC/ OWNER AGENT FOR SPECS.

TYPICAL MIRROR. SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT DIMENSIONS.

WASHER, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

RECESSED WATER VALVE BOX.

LAUNDRY ROOM
WALL MOUNTED SHOWER HEAD AT 72" A.F.F.

TOILET, SEE GC/OWNER AGENT FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

SINK, SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

BATHROOM
SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT STLYE, MATERIAL AND COLOR.

COUNTER TOP @ 36" A.F.F. SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT

WALL MOUNTED UPPER CABINETS, SEE GC/OWNER FOR
RANGE/OVEN COMBO, SEE BUILDER/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

DISHWASHER SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER

GARBAGE DISPOSAL AT SINK SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER 36" BASE CABINETS SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT LAYOUT, MFG

REFRIGERATOR SPACE, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT DIMENSIONS

KITCHEN AND BAR
COUNTER TOP AT 30" A.F.F. W/ KNEE SPACE (WHERE OCCURS)
WHERE IS SHOWN PROVIDE 50CFM INTERMITTENT EXHAUST FAN.

AND ANY ADOPTED LOCAL AMENDMENTS.

THERE SHALL BE A FLOOR OR LANDING AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM

TYPICAL CONCRETE LANDING AT EXTERIOR DOOR SHALL NOT
PROVIDE HOSE-BIBB W/RECESSES BRADLEY 7910 HOSE BOX OR EQUAL GAS FIRED ON DEMAND WATER HEATER, #GT15-240NI
ELECTRICAL MAIN PANEL. SEE ELEC LOAD CALCS.

PER M1502.4.1, INSTALL DRYER MOISTURE EXHAUST DUCT SYSTEM F.A.U. SEE MECH FOR DETAILS PROVIDED THE DOOR DOES NOT SWING OVER THE LANDING. MIN EXT. DOOR SERVED. LANDING SHALL BE MIN 36" IN DIRECTION OF SLOPE SLAB/DECK 1/4" PER 1'-0" AWAY FROM STRUCTURE
TO ME DRYER VENT PRESSURE DROP CALCULATION FOR COMPLIANCE.

DIRECT VENT RANGE HOOD/MICROWAVE COMBO. SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR (MAX 14' IN LENGTH-INCLUDING (2) NINETY DEGREE ELBOWS. REFER OF EACH STAIRWAY. ALL LANDINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
IRC CODE AND ANY ADOPTED LOCAL AMENDMENTS.

ALL STAIRWAYS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT IRC CODE
NOT BE MORE THAN 8" BELOW THE TOP OF THE THRESHOLD,

WIDTH OF LANDING SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL. LINE OF THE FLOOR ABOVE/RAILING.

NOT IN USE

EXACT LAYOUT, MFG, MODEL AND COLOR

MODEL AND COLOR
STYLE, MATERIAL AND COLOR..

COUNTER TOP 18" WIDE @ 44" A.F.F. OVER 6" PONY WALL
SPECS. INSTALL PER MF'R SPECS, SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

PAPER HLDR, SEE BUILDER/OWNER AGENT FOR EXACT TYPE AND MODEL.

WHERE IS SHOWN, PROVIDE SMOKE & CARBON DETECTORS.

1. IN EACH SLEEPING ROOM
WILL ACTIVATE ALL ALARMS. THE ALARM SHALL BE CLEARLY AUDIBLE PER IRC, SECTION 313, 314.3

3. ON EACH ADDITIONAL FLOOR OF THE DWELLING.

BE WIRED IN A MANNER THAT IF THE ACTUATION OF ONE ALARM LOCATIONS:

2. OUTSIDE EACH SLEEPING ROOM IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF

OF THE BEDRROMS

WHEN ONE OR MORE DETECTOR IS TO BE INSTALLED ALL ARE TO IN ALL BR's OVER BACKGROUND NOISE WITH ALL DOORS CLOSED INSTALL DRYER BOX MODEL # BD480 OR EQUAL WITH OWNER APPROVAL

INSTALL KIDDE SMOKE/CO DUEL DETECTOR KNCOSMBA OR EQUAL

GENERAL NOTES

CLOSET BUILT-INS, SEE GC/ OWNER FOR LAYOUT, MATERIAL

AND FINISH
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 20
21 22
23 24
25 33
34 35
36 37
39 51
52 53
54 55
56 60
61 80
81 82
83 38
A.O. SMITH SIGNATURE PREMIRE 6.6 GPM 160,000 BTU NATURAL GAS

OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE MECHANICAL ENGINEER

TANKLESS WATER HEATER

SUPPLIER TO FURNISH AND MAKE AVAILABLE FOR ALL INSPECTIONS

INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS AND OPERATOR/OWNER MANUALS

SINK SIZE, MATERIAL SPECIFIED BY BUILDER/KITCHEN DESIGNER

7. EACH PIECE OF SHEATHING (OSB OR PLYWOOD) SHALL BEAR THE GRADE OF THE

WAS GRADED

8. ALL WOOD CONNECTORS HOLES SHALL BE FILLED WITH NAILS PER THE MFG

2. ALL WOOD IN CONTACT WITHIN OF CONCRETE SHALL BE RWD OR PRESSURE TREATED

1. ALL WOOD SHALL BE AT 19% OR LESS MOISTURE CONTENT PRIOR TO COVERING

AND TRADEMARK OF THE GRADING AGENCY UNDER WHOSE RULES THE MEMBER

SHEET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APA GRADING RULES

5. EACH PIECE OF WOOD FRAMING SHALL BEAR THE GRADE OF THE WOOD SPECIES NATURAL RESISTANCE TO DECAY SUCH AS REDWOOD OR CEDAR 3. ALL WOOD EXPOSED TO WEATHER SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED OR WOOD OF

GENERAL FRAMING NOTES

4. PRESSURE TREATED WOOD SHALL NOT CONTAIN EITHER CHROMIUM OR ARSENIC

INSTRUCTIONS AND THE ENGINEERS SPECIFICATIONS

9. ALL FASTENERS (NAILS, SCREWS, HOLD-DOWNS, STRAPS, ANCHOR BOLTS, ETC.) USED TO CONNECT PRESSURE TREATED WOOD SHALL BE CORROSION RESISTANT

GALVANIZED OR STAINLESS STEEL FASTENERS

10. ADHESIVES OR EPOXY ANCHORS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE MFG INSTRUCTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDING, BUY NOT LIMITED TO, INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE

HOLE SIZES, HOLE CLEANING , TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY AND SETTING WORKING TIMES

11.FRAMING (SUB) CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL FINISHED CONCRETE AREAS FROM DAMAGE WITH MIN 1/2" GYPSUM (OR EQUAL) INSTALLED HORIZONTAL OVER THOSE AREAS

12. WHEN POSSIBLE NO PINS, SHOTS, TEMPORARY NAILS TO BE EMBEDDED INTO CONCRETE SURFACE

THAT IS DEEMED TO BE A FINISHED OR EXPOSED AREA

13. USE NOTED DIMENSIONS RATHER THAN 'SCALED' DIMENSIONS

14. IF DIMENSION DISCREPANCIES ARISE CONTACT THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IMMEDIATELY FOR CLARIFICATION

15. DIMENSIONS NOTED ARE FACE OF STUD EXTERIOR, FINISHED (AFTER 5/8" SHEET ROCK) INTERIOR INSTALLED BELOW 60" FROM FINISHED GRADE

NOT IN USE
DRYER, SEE GC/OWNER FOR EXACT MAKE AND MODEL.

NOT IN USE

NOT IN USE

BEDROOM

CLOS BAR
GARAGE
BATH
GARAGE
BATH
BAR

BEDROOM
DINING
CLOS
7 7
13 13
13 15 15
51 51
52 52
53 53
54 54
55 55
56 56
60 61 61 60
80 80
81 81
82 82
83 83
A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
1 A9.1
2 A9.1
2 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
1 A9.1
4 A9.1
4 A9.1
1 A9.1
5 A9.1
5 A9.1
7 A9.1
8 A9.1
7 A9.1
8 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
9 A9.1
10 A9.1
11 A9.1
6 A9.1
6 1 2-10 6-10 4 2-10 5-4 4 2-10 5-4 7 2-0 4-0 7 2-0 4-0 4 2-10 5-4 4 2-10 5-4 1 2-10 6-10 11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4 11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4
11 2-4 2-4
1 2-10 6-10
1 2-10 6-10
12 6-0 6-8 12 6-0 6-8
2 2-6 6-10 (X2) 9 1-6 2-8 (X2) 9 1-6 2-8 (X2)
3 4-0 5-0 3 4-0 5-0
10 2-4 2-4
7 2-0 4-0
4 2-10 5-4
7 2-0 4-0
4 2-10 5-4
4 2-10 5-4
7 2-0 4-0
4 2-10 5-4
7 2-0 4-0
9 1-6 2-8 (X3) 9 1-6 2-8 (X3)
BATH
CL

KITCHEN
BATH
BATH

LIVING LIVING
LOFT

BEDROOM BEDROOM

BEDROOM
CL
CL

KITCHEN
DINING
15 15
20 20
23 23
22 22 22
22 24 24
33 33
34 34
35 35
37 37 39 39
51 51
38 38
52 53
53 54
54 55
55 55
56 56
56 60
60 61
61 A9.1
3 A9.1
3 A9.1
5 A9.1
5 A9.1
12 A9.1
12 A9.1
13 A9.1
13 A9.1
14 A9.1
14 A9.1
6 A9.1
6 A9.1
6 15
51 WH 2 WH 2
15 CL
53 54 54
54 53
51 54
52 52
52 52

BATH BATH
55 60 61
56 60
61 6 6
16 16
16 DECORATIVE SHROUD
17 ELECTRICAL PANEL TO BE FED BY SOLAR SOLUTION
17 TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
UNIT A
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF

UNIT B UNIT A UNIT B
TOTAL: 1498 SF
SF LIVING: 1079 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
TOTAL: 1442 SF
SF LIVING: 1023 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
399
D
W
D
W
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 8.1 DIM FLOOR PLAN "D" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 D
A9.0 E
A9.0 D A9.0 E
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 C
A9.1 B
A9.0 A
A9.0 D
A9.0 E
A9.0 D A9.0 E

BEDROOM
CLOS
BAR
GARAGE
BATH
GARAGE
BATH
BAR

BEDROOM
WH
PWDR
BATH
DINING

LIVING LIVING
LOFT

BEDROOM

BEDROOM

BEDROOM
PWDR
CL
CL
23'-6"
35'-6"
20'-0 1/2" 20'-0 1/2" 20'-0"
40'-11 1/2"
43'-0"
51'-0"

KITCHEN

KITCHEN
CL
BATH
DINING
CLOS
8'-0" 4'-0"
4'-10" 41'-4" 4'-10"
4'-0" 8'-0" 23'-6"
4'-6 1/2" 4'-4" 4'-4" 10'-3 1/2"
51'-0"
25'-6" 25'-6"
2'-0 1/2" 7'-0 1/2" 9'-3" 4'-4" 2'-10" 2'-10" 4'-4" 9'-3 3/4" 6'-11 3/4" 2'-0 1/2" 10'-3 1/2" 4'-4" 4'-4" 4'-6 1/2"
10'-7 1/2" 10'-0 1/2" 10'-0 1/2" 10'-7 1/2"
7'-1 1/4" 2'-3" 4'-11 3/4"
3'-3"
6'-10" 12'-4" 5'-0" 5'-0" 12'-4" 6'-10"5'-5 3/4" 2'-3 1/4" 6'-9" 2'-1 1/4" 4'-9"
3'-5" 3'-3" 3'-4"
3'-7"
3'-3"
8'-6"
10'-9"
11'-1"
6'-0" 13'-2" 6'-4" 13'-2" 5'-8"
25'-6" 25'-2"
50'-8"
6'-4"
1'-3" 7'-11 3/4" 8'-1 1/4" 7'-0"
36'-0"
18'-7 1/2" 17'-4 1/4" 4'-11 3/4"
2'-10" 4'-1" 9'-2 1/4" 1'-3" 6'-1 3/4"
4'-10" 5'-0" 1'-9 1/4" 4'-11 3/4" 4'-11 1/4" 1'-9 1/4" 2'-2 1/2" 4'-0" 4'-6 1/2" 12'-1 1/2" 4'-10" 25'-6" 25'-6"
51'-0"
35'-6"
24'-10"
9'-8" 8'-4"
7'-11"
12'-0"
5'-4"
10'-8"
8'-3"
14'-4"
4'-10"
13'-2"
4'-7 3/4"
7'-11" 11'-9"
12'-8"
11'-8 1/4"
8'-11 1/2"
9'-11"
6'-11 1/2"
10'-5"
11'-8"
8'-5 1/4"
4'-5"
7'-0 1/4" 3'-8 3/4" 3'-7 3/4" 11'-10 1/4"
WH
3'-10"
3'-5" 3'-8 1/4"
3'-3"
8'-11" 3'-5" 5'-0" 2'-11 3/4"5'-0" 3'-5" 8'-11"
5'-8"
5'-7 1/2"
5'-1 1/2"
7'-11"
2'-11 3/4"
24'-10"
1'-6" 1'-6"
2'-7"
3'-9" 4'-8"
8'-10 1/4"
3'-9"
4'-8"
7'-8 3/4"
5'-0"
6'-7 3/4"
14'-8" 5'-0"
2'-0"
11'-9"
CL
BATH
11'-8 1/4"
6'-2 3/4" 4'-6"
2'-3 1/2"
3'-11" 3'-3"
3'-6"
7'-11"
5'-0"
3'-3"
6'-6"
6'-3"
8'-0 1/4"
12'-4"
2'-2 1/4" 2'-10 1/2" 7'-0"
2'-6"
1'-6" 1'-6"
1'-1"
4'-5 3/4"
12'-6 1/4"
3'-4 1/4" 6'-3" 9'-0 1/2"
FIRST FLOOR PLAN "D" UPPER FLOOR PLAN "D"
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
UNIT A
TOTAL: 845 SF
GARAGE : 426 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF

UNIT B UNIT A UNIT B
TOTAL: 1498 SF
SF LIVING: 1079 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
TOTAL: 1442 SF
SF LIVING: 1023 SF
FF LIVING: 419 SF
400
4 12 4 12
1 5 3 3 3 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 4 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 4 3 3 3 5 1
1 3 3 3 3 3 4 2 3 5 1 1 5 3 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 1
1 5 3 3 3 4 4 4
3 2 2 3
2 2
3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 1
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 8.2 ELEVATIONS "D" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
25'-0"

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
25'-0"
1 FINISHED GRADE
2 FASCIA, ACCENT COLOR AS SPCIFIED
3 BODY COLOR AS SPECIFIED
4 ASPHALT ROOF ROOFING, COLOR AS SPECIFIED
5 PORCELAIN TILE AS SPECIFIED

KEYNOTES
NOTE: ALL WINDOW AND DOORS TO BE WHITE VINYL

NOT LABELED FOR CLARITY
NOTE: FOR COLOR SPECIFICATIONS AND SCEDULE
REFER TO SHEET A 1.2 FOR COLOR PALETTE
TYP. SLAB ON FINISHED GRADE CONSTRUCTION
OVER 30# FELT PAPER, ROOF SHEATHING, AND PRE MFG TRUSS SYSTEM.

SEE DETAIL 19 ON A9.2
OVER SHEATHING, 5'8" SHEET ROCK, FOAM INSULATION,
TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION: SAND FINISH STUCCO
AND A TYPICAL FRAMED WALL, AS SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER.

SEE DETAIL 1 THROUGH 4 ON A9.2
REAR ELEVATION "D"
STREET ELEVATION "D"
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION "D" RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION "D"
6 6 6
6 6 SOLAR LOCATED ON ROOF

FINISHED FLOOR
100'-0"

TOP OF RIDGE
125'-0"
401
SLOPE 1/2":12 SLOPE 1/2":12
- TEMPERED GLASS
1 2-10 6-10
- SC - TEMPERED GLASS
- SWINGING
2 2-6 6-10 (X2)
- SC - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLDR
3 4-0 5-0
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
4 2-10 5-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
5 4-0 6-0
- METAL -STEEL GATE
13 3-0 4-10
- SWINGING - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
6 4-0 3-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
7 2-0 4-0
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
8 1-2 1-2
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
9 1-6 2-8
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
10 2-4 2-4
- METAL - TEMPERED GLASS
- FIXED
11 2-4 2-4
- METAL
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
6'-10"
2'-10"
6'-10"
5'-0"
- SWINGING
5'-0"
4'-0" 2'-4"
2'-4"
2'-4"
3'-0"
4'-10"
2'-4"
1'-6"
2'-8"
1'-2"
EQ
4'-0"
2'-0"
4'-0"
3'-4"
6'-0"
4'-0"
2'-10"
5'-4"
1'-9"
1'-6"
2'-10"
3'-5"
4'-10"
5'-8"
4'-2"
4'-6"
5'-10"

2. AS SET FORTH IN THE ADOPTED IRC AND/ALL CC&RS
PROVIDE SAFETY GLAZING IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: SECTION 308.4.1 TO R308.4.7. IRC. WINDOWS IN ALL SLEEPING AREAS SHALL MEET EGRS REQUIRED A) SLIDING OR SWINGING DOORS EXCEPT JALOUSIES.

B) TUB AND OR SHOWER ENCLOSURE AND
GLAZING IN THE WALLS LESS THAN 60” ABOVE THE STANDING SURFACES OF TUBS OR SHOWERS.

C) GLAZING IN FIXED AND SLIDING PANELS OF SLIDING DOOR ASSEMBLIES AND PANELS IN SLIDING AND BI -FOLD CLOSET DOOR ASSEMBLIES.

D) GLAZING IN DOORS AND ENCLOSURES
FOR HOT TUBS, WHIRLPOOLS, SAUNAS, STEAM ROOMS, BATHTUBS AND SHOWERS. GLAZING IN

ANY PART OF A BUILDING WALL ENCLOSING THESE COMPARTMENTS WHERE THE BOTTOM EXPOSED EDGE OF THE GLAZING IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES MEASURED HORIZONTALLY AND

VERTICALLY AND IN STRAIGHT LINE, FROM THE WATER EDGE AT ANY STANDING OR WALKING SURFACE.

1. EXTERIOR DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULE

ALL GLAZING TO BE INSTALLED IN COMPLIANCE AND AS SPECIFIED WITH

THE APPROVED IECC REPORT AS SUBMITTED AND APPROVED WITH THIS

3. ALL GLAZING TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS

THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN CONCERT WITH THE SUPPLIER TO SUPPLY

4. ALL CUT SHEETS AND ROUGH OPENING SIZES TO THE FRAMING CONTRACTOR

THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND PERMIT

PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ALL WORK TO BE PREFORMED
F.F. ELEV. = 0'-0"
(1 CONT.)

E) GLAZING IN AN INDIVIDUAL FIXED OR OPERABLE PANEL ADJACENT TO A DOOR WHERE THE NEAREST VERTICAL EDGE OF THE GLAZING IS WITHIN A 24 INCHES ARC OF BOTH VERTICAL EDGE OF THE DOOR IN A CLOSE POSITION AND WHOSE BOTTOM EDGE IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR OR WALKING SURFACE.

F) GLAZING ADJACENT TO STAIRWAYS, LANDINGS AND RAMPS WITHIN 36 INCHES HORIZONTALLY OF A WALKING SURFACE WHEN THE EXPOSED SURFACE OF THE GLASS IS LESS THAN 60 INCHES ABOVE THE NOSE OF THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE.

G) GLAZING WITHIN 18” OF THE FLOOR, INDIVIDUAL PANEL GREATER THAN 9 SQUARE FEET. H) ALL GLAZING IN RAILINGS REGARDLESS OF AN AREA OR HEIGHT ABOVE A WALKING SURFACE.

INCLUDED ARE STRUCTURAL BALUSTERS PANELS AND NON -STRUCTURAL IN FILL PANELS.

TOP PLATE = 6'-10"
- TEMPERED GLASS
- SLIDING
12 6-0 6-8
- METAL F
6'-0"
6'-8"
INSULATION @ R3.75 PER INCH, TO MAKE

CONDITIONED ATTIC SPACE

TYPICAL MFG TRUSS AND SHEATHING

REFER TO ENGINEERING
A TOTAL R VALUE OF 30.00 TO BOTTOM OF

ROOF SHEATHING
INSTALL 8" OF CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM
OR,
INSTALL R30 BATT INSULATION TO THE

BOTTOM OF ROOF SHEATHING

18. 19.

20. 21.

WHERE EVE VENTING OCCURS, FIRE BLOCK BELOW FASCIA @ STUD WALL AND LAY EVERY THIRD MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEEN HIGH AND LOW VENTS IS 3'-0" (MIN.).

ANY CHANGES IN THE ROOF SYSTEM (IE., SIZE, SHAPE, ETC. TO BE REPORTED IN WRITING TO NO CLOSER THAN 3'-0" TO THE EAVE
HIGH VENTS SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 1'-0" TO THE RIDGE AND LOW TILE VENTS SHALL BE TO ROOF CONNECTIONS, PAINT FLASHING TO MATCH.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

13. 14.

15. 16.

17. ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1'-0" FROM EDGE OF ROOF CRICKETS OR CANT

ON SITE VERIFICATION OF ALL CONDITIONS REQUIRED OF THE TRUSS SUPPLIER OR CONTRACTOR BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OR THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR.

OVER FRAMING TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FRAMING CONTRACTOR OR AS SPECIFIED INSTALLATION OF THE TRUSS SYSTEM, ON SITE FILLS , "CUT AND STACK" FRAMING AND ALL

PRIOR TO MANUFACTURING OF ANY TRUSSES OR COMPONENTS, THIS IS TO ENSURE PROPER SIZES QUANTITIES, SHAPES, SIZES, CONFIGURATIONS, ETC. OF ALL TRUSSES, HIP SETS, GABLE ENDS, "DREW-COAT" WATERPROOF DECKING MEMBRANE OVER O.S.B. FLOOR SHEATHING PROVIDE "DREW COAT" WATERPROOF DECKING MEMBRANE OVER THIS AREA OR EQUAL.

PROVIDE "BITHUTHENE 3000" WATERPROOF MEMBRANE AT ALL HORIZ. APPLICATIONS OF FIREPLACE. STACK LAP OVER SIDES MIN 6" ALL UNDER 20 GAL. G.I. CAP w/ MIN 2" LAP OVER SIDES. WELD ALL BREAKS IN PAN AND SLOPE TO DRAIN.

TO AVOID CONFLICTS.

ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BETWEEN TRADES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION STRIPS (TYPICAL).

APPORIATE BRACING PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY

ROOF TRUSS SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS USING ALL

REGARDING THE ACCOMMODATION OF THE INSTALLATION OF THE HEATING VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC) SYSTEM AND ITS' COMPONENTS.

TRUSS SUPPLIER TO ENSURE THAT ALL TRUSSES CONFORM TO ANY AND ALL SPECIFICATIONS

TRUSS SUPPLIER TO ENSURE THAT ALL TRUSSES CONFORM TO ANY AND ALL SPECIFICATIONS OF FRAMING CONTRACTOR TO USE SIMPSON HURRICANE CLIPS 2.5 OR BETTER AT THE END OF

ALL TRUSSES OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OR TRUSS SUPPLIER

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

INSTALLATION.

ROOFING SUB CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL FLASHING THROUGHOUT AND PROVIDE

PROVIDE LEAD FLASHING AT PROTRUDING PIPES THROUGH ROOF AND AT CURVED WALL

ROOF IS TO BE FLASHED AND COUNTER FLASHED AT WALLS, VALLEYS, PENETRATIONS, AND PROVIDE ALL BLOCKING AND FIRE STOPS AS REQUIRED.

ALL APPROPRIATE AREAS.

SEE STRUCT'L GENERAL NOTES FOR ROOF SHEATHING.

DASHED LINES DENOTE WALLS BELOW THE ROOF FRAMING.

BLOCKING AND ALL OTHER ROOF SYSTEM COMPONENTS ARE ASSUMED TO BE SUPPLIED IN THE "TRUSS PACKAGE" BY THE TRUSS MANUFACTURER.

AND QUANTITIES

THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PERTAINING TO DRAG TRUSSES, SHEAR TRUSSES, ETC

THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IMMEDIATELY
VENT BLOCK HORIZ. w/ BAFFLE AT INSULATION.

ROOF FRAMING (TRUSS) NOTES
BASIS FOR DESIGN:

ROOF TO BE UNVENTED AS ALLOWED PER IRC 806.5 WITH ALL CONDITIONS

ROOF VENTILATION DESIGN
MET AND/OR EXCEEDED. REFER TO DETAIL F ABOVE
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
ROOF PLAN "D" SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA A 8.3
ROOF PLAN "D"
402
w/ DBL TOP PLATE
(SLOPE SLAB 1/4" PER FT @ GARAGE AND PATIO SLABS.)
o/ APPR SUBGRADE PER SOILS REPORT, SEE STRUC PLANS
4" CONC SLAB (TYPICAL, U.N.O.)
TYPICAL SLAB FLOOR SYSTEM:
o/ 2x6 FRAMED STUDS @ 16" O.C. w/ R-19 BATT INS.

ALL ELEVATION HEIGHTS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS ARE

OVER PRE MANUFACTURED TRUSS SYSTEM

OVER ENGINEER SPECIFIED SHEATHING
TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM:

SMOOTH STUCCO
o/ PAPERBACKED WIRE LATH
o/ PLYWOOD SHEATHING (SEE STRUC. PLANS)
w/ P.T. OR REDWOOD SILL w/ 5/8" GYP BD @ INTERIOR SIDE
INDICATED ON FLOOR PLANS.

IN CONJUNCTION WITH 100'-0" BENCHMARK ELEVATION

SECTION NOTES
ROOF SYSTEM:

OVER 3/4" OSB. USE ONLY MFG APPROVED
(TYP. THROUGHOUT)

TPO (THERMOPLASTIC POLYOLEFIN)
SYSTEM APPLIED OVER 3/4" OSB. USE

ONLY MFG APPROVED SYSTEM APPLIED

ADHESIVES, SEAM WELDS AND FASTENERS

FINISHED GRADE

OR BLOWN CELLULOSE

MBCI CURVED BATTENLOK STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING SYSTEM

CHARCOAL GREY

OVER/PRE MANUFACTURED TRUSS SYSTEM

OVER/ENGINEER SPECIFIED SHEATHING
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 9.0 SECTIONS SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA

FINISHED PAD

FINISHED PAD
100'-0"
110'-1"

TOP PLATE
108'-1"

FINISHED FLOOR

SECOND LEVEL
118'-2"

FINISHED FLOOR

SECOND LEVEL
125'-4"
RIDGE

FINISHED PAD

FINISHED PAD
100'-0"
110'-1"

TOP PLATE
108'-1"

FINISHED FLOOR

SECOND LEVEL
118'-2"

FINISHED FLOOR

SECOND LEVEL
125'-4"
RIDGE

FINISHED PAD

FINISHED PAD
100'-0"
110'-1"

TOP PLATE
108'-1"

FINISHED FLOOR

SECOND LEVEL
118'-2"

FINISHED FLOOR

SECOND LEVEL
125'-4"
RIDGE

DINING ROOM LIVING ROOM

LAUNDRY BEDROOM BATH

LIVING ROOM DINING ROOM

BEDROOM LAUNDRY BATH

KITCHEN LIVING

ENTRY CLOSET

LIVING KITCHEN

CLOSET ENTRY

BEDROOM LIVING ROOM

ENTRY GARAGE

LIVING ROOM BEDROOM

GARAGE ENTRY

SECTION A SECTION B

SECTION C
A9.1 1 A9.1 1
A9.1 1
A9.1
20 A9.1
20 A9.1
20 A9.13 A9.1 3
A9.13
403
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 9.1 SECTIONS SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA

FINISHED PAD

FINISHED PAD
100'-0"
110'-1"

TOP PLATE
108'-1"

FINISHED FLOOR

SECOND LEVEL
118'-2"

FINISHED FLOOR

SECOND LEVEL
125'-4"
RIDGE

FINISHED PAD

FINISHED PAD
100'-0"
110'-1"

TOP PLATE
108'-1"

FINISHED FLOOR

SECOND LEVEL
118'-2"

FINISHED FLOOR

SECOND LEVEL
125'-4"
RIDGE
BATH BEDROOM 2 KITCHEN DINING ROOM

ENTRY LAUNDRY

GARAGE CLOSET BATH

BEDROOM LIVING ROOM

SECTION E
w/ DBL TOP PLATE
(SLOPE SLAB 1/4" PER FT @ GARAGE AND PATIO SLABS.)
o/ APPR SUBGRADE PER SOILS REPORT, SEE STRUC PLANS
4" CONC SLAB (TYPICAL, U.N.O.)
TYPICAL SLAB FLOOR SYSTEM:
o/ 2x6 FRAMED STUDS @ 16" O.C. w/ R-19 BATT INS.

ALL ELEVATION HEIGHTS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS ARE

OVER PRE MANUFACTURED TRUSS SYSTEM

OVER ENGINEER SPECIFIED SHEATHING
TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM:

SMOOTH STUCCO
o/ PAPERBACKED WIRE LATH
o/ PLYWOOD SHEATHING (SEE STRUC. PLANS)
w/ P.T. OR REDWOOD SILL w/ 5/8" GYP BD @ INTERIOR SIDE
INDICATED ON FLOOR PLANS.

IN CONJUNCTION WITH 100'-0" BENCHMARK ELEVATION

SECTION NOTES
ROOF SYSTEM:

OVER 3/4" OSB. USE ONLY MFG APPROVED
(TYP. THROUGHOUT)

TPO (THERMOPLASTIC POLYOLEFIN)
SYSTEM APPLIED OVER 3/4" OSB. USE

ONLY MFG APPROVED SYSTEM APPLIED

ADHESIVES, SEAM WELDS AND FASTENERS

FINISHED GRADE

OR BLOWN CELLULOSE

MBCI CURVED BATTENLOK STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING SYSTEM

CHARCOAL GREY

OVER/PRE MANUFACTURED TRUSS SYSTEM

OVER/ENGINEER SPECIFIED SHEATHING

SECTION D
A9.1 1
A9.1 1 A9.11
A9.1 1 A9.1
20 A9.1
20 A9.13 A9.13
404
1 EXTERIOR WALL DETAIL
6"

TYPICAL WALL
R-24.56
3 COAT STUCCO FINISH TO MATCH EXISTING

SHEATHING REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEER SPECIFICATIONS

CAVITY BETWEEN FRAMING TO BE FILLED WITH OPEN CELL
6" LVL FRAMING REFER TO ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS
5/8" SHEET ROCK, LEVEL 5 SMOOTH FINISH

POLYURETHANE FOAM INSULATION
R-VALUE 24.56
2 THICKENED EXTERIOR WALL DETAIL
12"

TYPICAL WALL
R-24.56
3 COAT STUCCO FINISH TO MATCH EXISTING

SHEATHING REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEER SPECIFICATIONS

CAVITY BETWEEN FRAMING TO BE FILLED WITH OPEN CELL
6" LVL FRAMING REFER TO ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS
5/8" SHEET ROCK, LEVEL 5 SMOOTH FINISH

POLYURETHANE FOAM INSULATION
R-VALUE 24.56
3 6" INTERIOR WALL DETAIL
6"
6" LVL FRAMING REFER TO ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS
R-19 BATTS INSULATION BETWEEN STUDS
5/8" SHEET ROCK, LEVEL 5 SMOOTH FINISH
5/8" SHEET ROCK, LEVEL 5 SMOOTH FINISH
4 5

TYPICAL WEEP SCREED

FINISH GRADE SLOPE
1-1/2" MIN.
4" MIN.
3-1/2" X 3/4" NON CORROSIVE
@ FIN. SLAB
@ GRADE
3 COAT STUCCO OVER

FINISH PER OWNER

METAL LATH WITH

EXTERIOR WALL ASSEMBLY

WEEP SCREED

CORROSION RESISTANT METAL
FRY REGLET J MOLDING OR/=
HEADER

FLASHING WITH DRIP AND WP

WALL FRAMING

REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS

BLOWN CELLULOSE INSULATION

REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS

MEMBRANE ALL SIDES OF OP'G

DOOR ASSEMBLY INSTALLED

PER MFG SPECIFICATIONS

CORROSION RESISTANT METAL

DOUBLE STUDS

FLASHING WITH DRIP AND WP

WALL FRAMING

REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS

BLOWN CELLULOSE INSULATION

REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS

MEMBRANE ALL SIDES OF OP'G

WINNDOW ASSEMBLY INSTALLED WINNDOW ASSEMBLY INSTALLED PER MFG SPECIFICATIONS

CORROSION RESISTANT METAL
HEADER

FLASHING WITH DRIP AND WP

REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS

MEMBRANE ALL SIDES OF OP'G

PER MFG SPECIFICATIONS

DOUBLE STUDS

CORROSION RESISTANT METAL

FLASHING WITH DRIP AND WP
3 COAT STUCCO SIDING

REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS

MEMBRANE ALL SIDES OF OP'G

WALL FRAMING

REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS

BLOWN CELLULOSE INSULATION

WALL FRAMING

REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS

BLOWN CELLULOSE INSULATION
3 COAT STUCCO SIDING
3 COAT STUCCO SIDING
3 COAT STUCCO SIDING

EXTERIOR DOOR JAMB EXTERIOR DOOR HEADER EXTERIOR WINDOW JAMB EXTERIOR WINDOW HEADER

WINNDOW ASSEMBLY INSTALLED

PER MFG SPECIFICATIONS

DOUBLE STUDS

CORROSION RESISTANT METAL

FLASHING WITH DRIP AND WP

REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS

MEMBRANE ALL SIDES OF OP'G

WALL FRAMING

REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS

BLOWN CELLULOSE INSULATION
3 COAT STUCCO SIDING

EXTERIOR WINDOW SILL
TYP. 5/8" TYPE "X" GYP. BD.

W/ STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS)

AT USEABLE SPACE BENEATH

STAIR AREAS

SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS
(VERIFY ALL STRUCTURAL
3-2x12 STRINGER

FLOOR FRAMING
6'-8" MIN.

HEAD CLR TYP
7-5/8"
11-1/2"

NOSE TO CEILING

GYP BOARD AT USEABLE
TYP. 5/8" TYPE "X"

SPACE BENEATH STAIR
AREAS
3/4" PLYWOOD TREADS

SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS
(VERIFY ALL STRUCTURAL

W/ STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS)

FLOOR FRAMING
3-2x12 STRINGER

FINISHED SURFACE
7-5/8"
11-1/2"
PER IRC, R311.5.3, RISER ON STAIRWAY SHALL
NOT EXCEED 8" AND TREAT NOT LESS THAN 9"
STAIR DETAIL @ LANDING STINGER DETAIL @ LANDING
TYP. 5/8" TYPE "X" GYP. BD. AT USABLE

SPACE BENEATH STAIR AREAS

SKIRT BOARD WHERE OCCURS
2x12 STRINGER

INSULATION
PROVIDE 5/8" TYPE "X' GYPBOARD

PRIOR TO STAIR INSTALLATION

FINISHED SURFACE
3/4" PLYWOOD TREADS
PER IRC, R311.4.3, THE WIDTH LANDING SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE DOOR SERVED. EACH LANDING SHALL BE MIN. 36" MEASURED IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL.

STAIR LANDING DETAIL
AS ALLOWED BY CODE.

TO BE PRESSURE TREATED OR SEPARATED
5/8" PLYWOOD RISERS
3 AT EACH STAIR RUN

ALL WOOD IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH CONCRETE
2x12 NOTCHED STRINGER
CONNECTIONS WITH STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.

SECURE PLATE WITH SHOT PINS. VERIFY ALL
SECURE WITH SIMPSON A-34 FRAMING ANCHORS.

NOTCH STRINGER AT SILL PLATE AND
3/4" PLYWOOD TREADS

FINISHED SURFACE
PER IRC, R311.5.3, RISER ON STAIRWAY SHALL
NOT EXCEED 8" AND TREAT NOT LESS THAN 9" 7-5/8"
11-1/2"
STRINGER @ FINISH FLOOR
BASIS FOR DESIGN:

ROOF TO BE UNVENTED AS ALLOWED PER IRC 806.5 WITH ALL CONDITIONS

ROOF INSULATION DESIGN
MET AND/OR EXCEEDED. REFER TO DETAIL BELOW:

INSULATION @ R3.75 PER INCH, TO MAKE

CONDITIONED ATTIC SPACE

TYPICAL MFG TRUSS AND SHEATHING

REFER TO ENGINEERING
A TOTAL R VALUE OF 30.00 TO BOTTOM OF

ROOF SHEATHING
INSTALL 8" OF CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM
OR,
INSTALL R30 BATT INSULATION TO THE

BOTTOM OF ROOF SHEATHING

TYP DOOR THRESHOLD DETAIL
@SLAB OR SUBFLOOR

FINISHED FLOOR

EXPANSION JOINT

METAL THRESHOLD
DOOR
@ CONC STOOP
1/4:12 SLOPE

PER ROOF MANUFACTURER

INSTRUCTIONS

REQUIRED CLEARANCE

MEMBRANE SEALANT STRIP

CORROSION RESISTANT
1" MINIMUM "V" CRIMP

METAL FLASHING W/

FULLY ADHERED

OVER ROOF SHEATHING

TILE ROOFING (PER OWNER)

CORROSION RESISTANT
"Z" BAR METAL FLASHING

METAL BASE FLASHING

CORROSION RESISTANT
OVER 30# FELT
MIN. LAP
6" 3"
MIN. LAP
6" 3"
4" MIN.
3 COAT STUCCO OVER

FINISH PER OWNER

METAL LATH WITH

ROOF FLASHING DETAIL
30# FELT PAPER

CONCRETE TILE ROOFING

MFG AND COLOR BY OWNER

VALLEY FLASHING DETAIL
2x NAILER

AS REQUIRED

PRE MFG ROOF TRUSS
30# FELT PAPER

METAL SEAM ROOFING

MFG AND COLOR BY OWNER

ROOF SHEATHING

REFER TO ENGINEERING
G.I. RIDGE CAP OR =

WP MEMBRANE

RIDGE DETAIL
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 Fascia detail
G.I. DRIP
R-19 BATT INSUL.

R-30 INSUL.

ROOF SHEATHING

CONCRETE TILE
2X FASCIA
21 3 COAT STUCCO

TO MATCH
1 X SHINGLE MOULD
2X RAFTER

PER ENGINEER

PER ENGINEER

TO MATCH

TO MATCH

TO MATCH
12 8

ROOF PITCH TO

MATCH EXISTING

GC TO VERIFY
1-HR WALL STAGGERED STUD WALL
UNIT SEPERATION DATE: 4/28/21 ADDRESS:TBD OXNARD, CA
A 9.2 DETAILS SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA 12"

TYPICAL WALL
R-24.56
3 COAT STUCCO FINISH TO MATCH EXISTING

SHEATHING REFER TO STRUCTURAL

CAVITY BETWEEN FRAMING TO BE FILLED WITH OPEN
6" LVL FRAMING REFER TO ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS
5/8" SHEET ROCK, LEVEL 5 SMOOTH FINISH

CELL POLYURETHANE FOAM INSULATION
R-VALUE 24.56
6"
6" LVL FRAMING REFER TO ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS
R-19 BATTS INSULATION BETWEEN STUDS
5/8" SHEET ROCK, LEVEL 5 SMOOTH FINISH
5/8" SHEET ROCK, LEVEL 5 SMOOTH FINISH

ENGINEER SPECIFICATIONS
405

REAR ELEVATION

STREET ELEVATION

LEFT SIDE ELEVATION RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
DATE: 4/28/21
ADDRESS:TBD

OXNARD, CA
A 10.0COLOR SCHEME ELEVATIONS
SHEET NUMBERPORTOFINO PL. & FIFTH STREET, OXNARD CA
406
407
408
409
ATTACHMENT E - City of Oxnard 2030 General Plan Consistency Analysis Portofino Place
January 18, 2022 City Council
Level I: Direct Applicability to a Proposed Policy, Project or Program Level II: Related or Indirect Applicability to the Proposed Policy, Project, or Program Level III: No or Distance Applicability to the Proposed Policy, Project, or Program.

All polices not listed are designated as Level III are deemed consistent with the 2030 General Plan.

General Plan Chapter Abbreviations Chapter:

SC: Sustainable Community 2
CD: Community Development 3
ICS: Infrastructure and Community Services 4
ER: Environmental Resources 5
SH: Safety and Hazards 6
MC: Military Compatibility 7
HE: 2013-2021 Mid-Cycle Housing Element 8
2030 General Plan Level I Level II Rationale
Policy
SC-3.1
New Residential Development Encourage incorporation of passive and active energy and resources conservation design and devices in new residential development and substantial remodels and/or expansions.

X State “Green Building
Energy Code” applies to
all development and
either requires, or
requires that new
residential structures be
designed to
accommodate, passive
energy, solar panels,
and natural ventilation
features. Solar panels
are included in the
project.

Policy
SC-3.8
Require Use of Passive Energy Conservation Design As part of the City and Community EAP’s, require the use of passive energy conservation by building material massing, orientation, landscape shading, materials, and other techniques as part of the design of local buildings, where feasible.

X
Policy
SC-3.9
Promote Voluntary Incentive Programs Promote voluntary participation in incentive programs to increase the use of solar photovoltaic systems in new and existing residential, commercial, institutional and public buildings, including continued participation in the Ventura County Regional Energy Alliance (VCREA).

X
Policy
SC-3.12
Encourage Natural Ventilation Review and revise applicable planning and building policies and regulations to promote use of natural ventilation in new construction and major additions or remodeling consistent with Oxnard’s temperate climate.

X

Page 1 ends

410
Policy
CD-1.4
Transportation Choices
Promote the application of land use and community designs that provide residents with the opportunity for a variety of transportation choices (pedestrian, bicycle, transit, automobile).

X Project conditioned to
install curbside bus stop
on the southeast corner
of Fifth Street.

Policy
CD-1.5
Housing Variety
Promote the development of a variety of housing types throughout the City including apartments, condominiums, lofts, townhouses, and attached and detached single family units.

X Project has 6 different floor
plans with 45 units having 2
bedrooms and 45 units
having 3 bedrooms.

Policy
CD-1.6
Public Facilities
Enhance resident quality of life by providing adequate space for schools, libraries, parks and recreation areas, as well as space for the expansion of public facilities to support the community’s vision.

X Project site has a
pedestrian connection to
the shopping center
located to the west of the
project site at the corner
of Fifth St. and Victoria
Ave. The Southwest Park
is located directly east of
the project site. Juan
Lagunas Soria Elementary
School is located adjacent
to the project site.

Policy
CD-1.7
Compact Development
Promote the use of development patterns that are more compactly built and use space in an efficient aesthetic manner as part of the community vision.

X Project utilizes the entire
parcel and has
incorporated storm water
retention.

Policy
CD-3.1
Neighborhood Preservation
Protect existing residential neighborhoods from the encroachment of incompatible activities and land uses as determined through environmental review and/or determination by the Planning Commission.

X The project retains access to
adjoining residential and
commercial properties and
site design creates
compatible transition to
adjoining residential and
commercial uses.

Policy
CD-2.1
General Plan/Zoning Consistency
Amend the zoning code, zoning map, Coastal Land Use Program, and other land use regulations to make them consistency with the adopted and/or subsequently amended 2030 X With approval of the
General Plan Amendment
and Zone Change the

Page 2 ends

411
General Plan project will be consistent
with the 2030 General
Plan and City’s City Code
(Zoning Ordinance).

Policy
CD-3.3
Innovative Redevelopment
Promote innovative design flexibility and possibly different residential densities in public and public/private redevelopment within existing neighborhoods through the use of alternative performance-oriented development standards, alternative development designs, development agreements, specific plans, mixed uses, and other development and planning techniques.

X The project is
designed to meet City
Council Resolution
No. 7658 with the
exception of
designing individual
outdoor patios with
the minimum
dimensions of 10 feet
by 10 feet which
yields 100 square feet
of land area.

However, the land
area of the project’s
private patios ranges
from 450 to 1,530
square feet which
exceeds the minimum
land area of 100
square feet provided
by private patios
designed under City
Council Resolution
No. 7658.

Policy
CD-8.1
Limiting Development
Continue to limit development to those areas that can be served by existing or planned utilities, transportation, and service systems.

X Project will be served
by existing utilities
with minimal impacts
on City infrastructure
Policy and services.

CD-8.2
Services
Continue to ensure that public services and facilities are in place at the time of need or prior to the time new development occurs in order to avoid overloading existing urban service systems.

X
Policy
CD-8.5
Impact Mitigation
Ensure that new development avoids or mitigates impacts on air quality, traffic congestion, noise, and environmental resources to the maximum extent feasible.

X Addendum MND
2004-11 that the
project would not

Page 3 ends

412
have a significant
impact if the
mitigation measures
described in the
Addendum MND were
incorporated into the
project. Mitigation
measures have been
incorporated into the
project Resolutions.

Policy
CD-9.1
Neighborhood Identity
Recognize, preserve, and improve the visual identity and character of existing neighborhoods.

Infill development shall respect historic structures and be of compatible scale and character with historic areas.

X Project is adjacent to
existing residential
subdivisions with similar
density. There are no
historic areas or
resources on the project
site or in the immediate
vicinity.

Policy
CD-10.1
Human-Scale Development
In the evaluation of development proposals, require urban development on a human scale, by emphasizing the pedestrian experience over the movement and storage of vehicles.

X Landscaped walkways,,
play ground, and a
recreational building
designed to offer fitness
options for residents.
quality pedestrian areas.

The majority of visitor
parking will be contained
within the individual
unit’s driveways with only
42 surface parking spaces
integrated within the
project site.

Page 4 ends

413
Policy
CD-10.2
Neighborhood Themes
In the evaluation of development proposals, require neighborhood themes and principles of design, such as neotraditional town planning, which include central parks, schools, and community and commercial facilities, strong pedestrian orientation and de-emphasis of automobile related elements in new development projects.

X In addition to the R-2
development
standards, City
Council Resolution
No. 7658 provides
advisory standards
that are intended to
encourage amenities
that enhance the
livability of
condominiums but
are not mandatory.

The proposed project
complies with all of
the advisory
standards with the
exception of the
required dimensions
for private patios.

The project was
designed to be
similar to the
neighboring
communities with
similar density.

Policy
CD14.1
Design Review Process
In the evaluation of development proposals, continue to ensure that public and private development projects comply with City design policies, plans, and guidelines.

X Project was reviewed by
the Development
Advisory Committee
that includes an
architect and landscape
architect on contract
with the City The
applicant received
public comments at a
City Workshop where
the applicant mailed
notices of the
Community Workshop
meeting to all property
owners within the
Seaview Estates
neighborhood.

Page 5 ends

414
Policy
CD-14.2
Development Advisory Committee (DAC) Function
Continue to require that a staff Development Advisory Committee review new development projects for consistency with the City’s development policies and appropriateness for the proposed sites.

X Project was reviewed by
the Development
Advisory Committee on
three occasions and the
current plan reflects the
input provided by DAC.

Policy
ICS-1.1
Maintain Existing Service Levels
Maintain the high priority of providing services to residents and visitors, and prevent deterioration of existing service levels.

X Project will be
connected to and
served by existing
utilities with minimal
impacts on City
infrastructure.

Policy
ICS-1.2
Development Impacts to Existing Infrastructure
Review development proposals for their impacts on infrastructure (i.e., sewer, water, fire stations, libraries, streets) and require appropriate mitigation measures to ensure that proposed developments do not create substantial adverse impacts on existing infrastructure and that the necessary infrastructure will be in place to support the development.

X
The project will pay a
range of impact fees to
the City, County, and
school districts for
various public facilities.

Policy
ICS-1.3
Funding for Public Facilities
Continue to utilize developer fees, public facilities fees, and other methods (i.e., grant funding or assessment districts) to finance public facility design, construction, operation, and maintenance.

X
Policy
ICS-1.4
Infrastructure Conditions of Approval
New development should not be approved unless:
• The applicant demonstrates adequate public services and facilities are available; • Infrastructure improvements incorporate a range of feasible measures that can be implemented to reduce all public safety and/or environmental impacts associated with the construction, operation, or maintenance of any required improvement; • Infrastructure improvements are consistent with City infrastructure master plans; and • Require infrastructure expansion needed for future development to be self-funding so current residents do not subsidize infrastructure needed for future growth.

X Project will be
connected to and
served by existing
utilities with minimal
impacts on City
infrastructure.

Policy
ICS-2.6
Reduction of Construction Impacts
Minimize and monitor traffic and parking issues associated with construction activities, require additional traffic lanes and/or other traffic improvements for ingress and egress for new developments for traffic and safety reason, where appropriate.

X The Addendum to MND
2004-11 determined
that project, similar to
the original project
analyzed by MND
2004-11 will not

Page 6 ends

415
significantly impact
levels of service at
study intersections.

Policy
ICS-8.3
Completing Bicycle and Sidewalk Network
Prioritize plans for bicycle and pedestrian facilities that provide continuity, and close gaps in the city’s existing bike path and sidewalk network.

X The project will have
Gold Coast Transit bus
service. The project is
conditioned to install
curbside bus stop on
the southeast corner of
Fifth Street.

The 30-foot scenic
setback enhances the
existing Fifth Street
public sidewalk.

All ADA requirements
are provided.

Policy
ICS-8.4
New Development Requires Bicycle Improvements
Where designated, require proposed developments to include bicycle paths and / or lanes in their plan and to clearly indicate possible bicycling hazards such as speed bumps and storm drain inlet grates in parking lots.

X
Policy
ICS-8.5
Public Sidewalks and Pedestrian Orientation
Consider and require where appropriate and feasible the enhancement of the pedestrian environmental as part of private development and public works projects, especially for public sidewalks.

X
Policy
ICS-8.6
Americans with Disability Act (ADA) Handicap Requirements Require installation of ADA compliant handicapped ramp curb-cuts and other ADA access with all new roadway construction and significant reconstruction of existing roadways, parking lots, plazas and pedestrian area, and parks.

X
Policy
ICS-9.2
Development Has Adequate Parking
Review development proposals to encourage shared parking use and ensure adverse parking impacts are minimized or avoided.

X The project
provides more than
the required
parking as
stipulated in the
Oxnard City Code.

Policy
ICS-10.2
Oxnard Airport Compatible Land Use
Continue to ensure that the land use and zoning adjacent to Oxnard Airport is compatible in order to minimize potential noise and safety problems.

X The project site is
within the Oxnard
Airport Sphere of
Influence, which limits
the structural coverage
to 25 percent. The
proposed project is
designed to not exceed
the 25 percent
allowable site

Page 7 ends

416
coverage. Additionally,
the modified project
would be required to
implement Mitigation
Measures G-1 and G-2
of the 2004 MND to
avoid conflicts with
airport compatibility
requirements by
providing necessary
buffers as well as filing
with and undergoing
review by the Federal
Aviation
Administration. With
implementation of
Mitigation Measures
G-2 and K-1 from the
2004 MND and
compliance with
applicable regulations,
the modified project
would not result in new
or substantially more
severe significant
impacts associated
with applicable land
use, habitat
conservation, or
natural community
conservation plans, or
dividing an established
community.

Policy
ICS-11.7
Water Wise Landscapes
Promote water conservation in landscaping for public facilities and streetscapes, residential, commercial and industrial facilities and require new developments to incorporate water conserving fixtures (low water usage) and water-efficient plants into new landscaping.

X Project landscaping is
conditioned to meet
the City and State
water-conservation
requirements.

Page 8 ends

417
Policy
ICS-11.10
Water Supply Finding for Smaller Projects
Prior to approval of a discretionary proposed project not subject to a Water Supply Assessment pursuant to GC Section 66473.7, a finding shall be made ensure an adequate water supply for the proposed development.

X Project would require
less water than the light
industrial uses currently
allowed under the
Business Research Park
zoning.

Policy
ICS-13.3
Stormwater Detention Basins
Design stormwater detention basins to ensure public safety, to be either visually attractive or unobtrusive, provide temporary or permanent wildlife habitats, and recreational uses where feasible in light of safety concerns.

X Project meets the
City’s stormwater
requirements and
incorporates LID
features.

Policy
ICS-13.4
Low Impact Development
Incorporate low impact development (LID) alternatives for stormwater quality control into development requirements. LID alternatives include: (1) conserving natural areas and reducing imperviousness, (2) runoff storage, (3) hydro-modification (to mimic pre-development runoff volume and flow rate), and (4) public education.

X
Policy
ICS-14.3
New Development Requirements
Continue to require developers and operators to employ practices that reduce the quantities of waste generated and promote resource recovery during construction, demolition, and operation.

X Standard conditions
of approval require
compliance with City
and State refuse
recycling.

Policy
ICS-17.4
Service Extension
Coordinate with gas and electricity providers for the extension of gas and electrical facilities.

X SCE and the Gas
Company are included
in the project review
Policy process.

ICS-17.5
Undergrounding of Utility Lines
Require undergrounding of utility lines in new development, except where it is not feasible due to electrical transmission load or other operational issues.

X
Policy
ICS-19.2
Police Review of Development Projects
Continue to require the Police Department review proposed development projects and provide recommendations that enhance public safety.

X The Oxnard Police
Department reviewed
and conditioned the
project. Capital Project
fees and property taxes
contribute to
maintenance and
development of Police
Department facilities
and services.

Policy
ICS-19.5
Incorporating Security Design Principles
Encourage crime prevention and defensible space through design principles such as those employed through the National Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design program, Neighborhood Watch Program, and/or other appropriate methods to enhance public safety.

X

Page 9 ends

418
Policy
ICS-19.7
New Development
Require new developments to fund a fair share extension of police services to maintain service standards, including personnel and capital improvement costs.

X
Policy
ICS-20.5
Fire Services to New Development
Require new developments to fund a fair share extension of fire services to maintain service standards, including personnel and capital improvements costs.

X The Oxnard Fire
Department reviewed
and conditioned the
project. Capital Project
fees and property taxes
contribute to
maintenance and
development of Police
Department facilities
and services.

Policy
ICS-20.7
Adherence to City Standards
Ensure that water main size, water flow, fire hydrant spacing, and other fire facilities meet City standards.

X
Policy
ICS-20.8
Development Review
Review new development applications to assess potential impacts to existing fire protection services and the need for additional and expanded services.

X
Policy
ICS-20.10
Adequate Emergency Access and Routes
Require that new development provide adequate access for emergency vehicles, particularly firefighting equipment, and evacuation routes, as appropriate.

X
Policy
ER-6.1
Incorporate Views in New Development
Preserve important public views and viewsheds by ensuring that the scale, bulk and setback of new development does not significantly impede or disrupt them and ensure that important vistas and view corridors are enhanced. Require development to provide physical breaks to allow views into these vistas and view corridors.

X The 30 ft. setback along
Fifth Street complies
with the designation of
Fifth Street as a
scenic corridor.

Policy
ER-6.6
New Development Private Open Space
Ensure that new development incorporates open space areas that provide community and neighborhood identity, private quality exterior private open space for each housing unit, and minimize conflicting land uses and noise generators.

X Project incorporates
walkways, playground
area, 3,281 recreation
building inclusive of a
gym, and a
common swimming
pool that are located
away from Fifth
Street traffic noise.

Policy
ER-10.1
Promote use of Native and Water Wise Plants
Promote the development of a native, drought-tolerant landscape character throughout the City that re-enforces a unified and cohesive landscape character and discourage plants that are invasive or problematic in other ways as determined by the City’s landscape architect.

X Project is conditioned
to comply with City
landscape standards
that incorporate state
requirements to be
drought tolerant.

Page 10 ends

419
Policy
ER-11.3
Development Applicants to Conduct Research
Continue to require project applicants to have a qualified archaeologist conduct a record search at the South Central Coast Information Center located at California State University Fullerton and other appropriate historical repositories, conduct field surveys where appropriate, and prepare technical reports, where appropriate, meeting California Office of Historic Preservation Standards (Archaeological Resource Management Reports) prior to project approval.

X Addendum for MND
2004-11 determined that
the project would not
have a significant impact
if the mitigation
measures described in
the 2004 MND were
incorporated into the
project. The mitigation
measures have been
incorporated into the
project’s conditions of
approval.

Policy
ER-11.7
Native American Remains
Continue to comply with State laws relating to the disposition of Native American burials consistent with the CEQA Guidelines (Section 15064.5) if human remains of possible Native American origin are discovered during project construction.

X
Policy
ER-14.4
Emission Control Devices
Require all construction equipment to be maintained and tuned to meet appropriate EPA, CARB, and VCAPCD emissions requirements and when new emission control devices or operational modifications are found to be effective, such devices or operational modifications are required on construction equipment.

X
Policy
ER-14.6
Minimizing Dust and Air Emissions through Permitting Requirements Continue to require mitigation measures as a condition of obtaining building or use permits to minimize dust and air emissions impacts from construction.

X
Policy
ER-14.7
Mitigation Monitoring
Ensure that projects with identified air quality impacts in their respective EIRs are subject to effective mitigation monitoring as required by AB 3180.

X
Policy
SH-1.1
Minimize Liquefaction Risk
Ensure that structures for human occupancy are only constructed or placed on a potential liquefaction site if the approved geological report shows that an acceptable hazard risk would be created and/or required mitigation measures are met.

X
Policy
SH-1.3
Building Code Standards
Require that all new buildings and alterations to existing buildings be built according to the seismic requirements adopted within the most current City of Oxnard Building Code, or its adopted equivalent.

X Addendum for MND
2004-11 determined that
the project would not
have a significant impact
if the mitigation
measures described in
the 2004 MND were
incorporated into the
project. The mitigation
Policy
SH-1.4
Soil, Geologic, and Structural Evaluation Reports
Require that adequate soils, and geologic and structural evaluation reports be prepared by registered soils engineers, engineering geologists, and/or structural engineers, as appropriate, for applicable development.

X

Page 11 ends

420
measures have been
incorporated into the
project’s conditions of
approval.

Policy
SH-1.5
Required Geologic Reports
Continue to require the submission of a geological report for proposed development located in a potential liquefaction area.

X
Policy
SH-1.7
Soil Investigations
Continue to require a complete site-specific soils investigation that addresses liquefaction and compressible soil characteristics and identifies construction techniques or other mitigation measures to prevent significant impacts upon the proposed development.

X
Policy
SH-5.3
Sound Attenuation Measures
Promote, where feasible, alternative sound attenuation measures such as berms, heavy landscaping, resurfacing of noise walls to promote noise absorption as well as deflection, berms and landscaping, or location of buildings away from the roadway or other noise sources.

X
Policy
SH-6.2
Limiting Construction Activities Continue to limit construction activities to the hours of 7 am to 7pm, Monday through Saturday. No construction shall occur after hours, on Sundays, or national holidays without permission from the City.

X
Policy
SH-6.4
New Development Noise Compatibility
Require that proposed development projects not generate more noise than that classified as “satisfactory” based on CEQA Thresholds of significance on nearby property.

X
Policy
SH-6.13
Noise Acceptable for Open Windows and Patios
Continue to require noise analysis of proposed development projects as part of the environmental review process and require mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to acceptable levels within outside activity areas and within residential structures without relying on mechanical ventilation, if feasible.

X
Policy
MC-4.4
Affordable Housing
Promote the availability and development of off-base affordable housing to meet the needs of the military personnel and their families.

X A condition of approval
requires noticing Naval
Base Ventura County
Housing Service Center
of the project and its
anticipated sales prices.

Housing
Element
Policy
G-2.3
Adequate Infrastructure
Ensure that residential development sites have appropriate and adequate public and private services and facilities, including wastewater collection and treatment, potable and recycled water supply, utilities, parks, schools, and other neighborhood infrastructure.

X Project will be
connected to and
served by existing
utilities with minimal

Page 12 ends

421
impacts on City
infrastructure.

Housing
Element
Policy
G-2.8
Local Preference for Affordable Units
Require, when possible, by development agreement or condition of approval, local resident/worker preference for projects which include affordable housing units, density bonus units, and/or units utilizing Federal, State, or local funding.

X A condition of
approval requires an
early advertisement
to local residents in
compliance with fair
housing law.

Housing
Element
Policy
G-5.6
Adjusting Project Development Fees
Continue to consider alternative sources for and/or deferment of development impact and project reviews fees to enhance the financial feasibility of affordable projects, including the use of Affordable Housing Agreements.

X The applicants paid
all applicable fees
under regular
procedures.

Page 13 ends

422
Attachment J
Portofino Place Zoning ComplianceTable
90 CONDOMINIUM UNIT PROJECT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL USE:

APPLY R-2 ‘MULTIPLE-FAMILY STANDARDS

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARD
REQUIREMENT PROPOSED COMPLIES?
Max. building height
(16-137)
2 stories at 25 ft.

Residential Units and
Recreational Building designed
at maximum 25 feet high
YES
Density
(16-59)
1 unit /3,500 lot area = 94 units on

7.39 acres
90 Units YES
Front yard setback
16-142, 16-60
25 ft from property line; 30 ft
when abutting designated scenic
corridors, per General Plan Policy
CD-9.4. West 5th Street is
identified as a Scenic Highway
(Background Report, Section

5.3.2).
30 ft from Fifth Street measured
from ultimate property line
YES
Side yard setback
16-142, 16-61
25% of depth of residential lot area
not to be less than 3 feet and not to
exceed 5 feet)
east side = 15 ft
west side = 15 ft
YES
Rear yard setback
16-142, 16-62
16 feet (25% depth of residential
lot area)
16’-3” YES
Interior yard space
16-142, 16-63
30% of lot area, with min.
dimension of 15 ft x 15 ft. May
not include vehicle parking or
circulation areas.
321,908 sf x 30% = 96,572.4 sf
Interior yard space of 115,024 sf
= 34%
YES
423
Attachment J
Portofino Place Zoning ComplianceTable
Off-street parking:

Residents (16-622)
Visitor (16-622)
Motorcycle (16-264)
Bicycle (16-623, 16-637
& Bicycle and Pedestrian
Facilities Master Plan,
Appendix pg. A-38)
Code-required parking
90 x 2-car garage = 180 garage
Visitor = 30 +60*0.5 = 60 visitor
Total Required = 180 + 60 = 240
spaces
No motorcycle spaces required
Bicycle (per Bicycle & Ped.

Master Plan, Appx pg. A-38), 0.05
spaces/bedroom, min. 2 spaces.
225 bedrooms x 0.05 = 11.25
Project includes:
180 resident garage spaces
180 visitor surface spaces
(driveways)
0 motorcycle spaces
34 parking lot visitor spaces
214 visitor spaces total
Total: 394 parking spaces
No tandem spaces proposed.

No compact spaces proposed
0 Motorcycle Spaces provided
8 bicycle spaces provided.

Project conditioned to provide
12 bicycle parking spaces
YES
YES

YES, AS

CONDITIONED
Parking space sizes &
design:

Standard (16-636 &
16-638)
Full Size: 9 ft W x 19 ft L
May overhang walkway provided
48 inch walkway unobstructed,
may overhang 2 ft over landscape
if planter min. 5 ft [16-616(C)]
Compact:8 ft Wx16 ft L; Max
25% of spaces w/admin relief
Motorcycle: 4.5 ft W x 7 ft L
Standard Parking = 20 ft x 20
ft garage spaces & driveways.

No compact spaces provided.

No Motorcycle spaces
provided
YES
N/A
N/A
Rooftop equipment May not protrude above height of
parapet.

No rooftop equipment
proposed.

YES, AS

CONDITIONED
424
Attachment J
Portofino Place Zoning ComplianceTable
Walls/Fences &
Zone Wall
(16-310)
Front: No fence or wall permitted
in front setback. No chain link in
front yard.

Side & Rear: 8 ft maximum
6 ft wrought iron fence & 6 ft
slumpstone walls with caps
surrounding development, not
within front setback
YES
Lighting
(16-320)
Comply with Section 16-320 of the
City Code.
● Max 7 footcandles
● A light source shall not shine
upon any surface other than the
area required to be lighted.
● Parking lot fixtures shall be
mounted on reinforced concrete
pedestals or otherwise
protected.

Partial Lighting Plan provided
(Sheet L-03) for parking lots,
walkways, drive aisles, open
spaces:
25 ft pole height (pole is 22.5 ft
and the base is 2.5 ft)
YES,
w/condition for
photometric
review
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
Attachment L
City Council Resolution No. 7658
Advisory Condominium
Standard Table
90 CONDOMINIUM UNIT PROJECT
ADVISORY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR CONDOMINIUM PROJECT :

NOT MANDATORY

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARD
REQUIREMENT PROPOSED COMPLIES?
Number of Bedrooms
Each unit shall have no fewer than 2
separate bedrooms
45: 2-bedroom units
45: 3-bedroom units
YES
Dwelling Size Each unit shall not be smaller in
area than 1,000 sq.ft.

Unit living square foot range:
1,413 to 1,476 YES
Distance to Parking
Spaces
– Resident Parking:
50 ft. max. distance to spaces from
the dwelling units they serve.
– Visitor Parking:
100 ft. max. distance to spaces from
the dwelling units they serve.

Resident parking spaces less
than 50 feet to the units they
serve; spaces are within same
building as the unit served
(attached garage located on
first floor).

Visitor spaces are within 100
ft.

YES
Private Patios
– Minimum outdoor patio area not
less than 20% of GFA of the unit it
serves.
– Min. dimensions 10 ft. by 10 ft.
– Immediately adjacent and direct
access to the unit served.
– Minimize overview to adjacent
patios.
– Lights not to exceed 6 ft. height.
– Patios adjacent to common open
areas used by residents.
– Min 20%
– Min. 10’ x 10’ Sundecks are
provided for each unit and
range between 450 to 1,530 sq
ft each.
– Adjacent and accessible to
each unit
– Patios adjacent to common
open space area
NO;

HOWEVER,

SUN DECKS
ARE

PROVIDED

FOR EACH

UNIT WITH

GREATER

LAND AREA

THAN THE

MINIMUM

REQUIRED

UNDER CITY

COUNCIL

RESOLUTION
NO. 7658
Common Areas
– Formal: Jacuzzi, spa, clubhouse,
barbecues, picnic tables, etc.
– Informal: Lawn area with min.
dimensions of 45 ft. and area not
less than 3,500 sq.ft.

Pool/ Playground area
recreational Building
YES
436
Attachment L
City Council Resolution No. 7658
Advisory Condominium
Standard Table
– Children: Tot lot, jungle gym.

Storage
– 1 private storage area per unit.
– Minimum area: 225 cubic ft.(ft.³).
– Minimum width: 4 ft.
– All units have storage areas
within garages
– Min. 225 ft.³
– Min. width 4 ft. YES, AS

CONDITIONED
Security – Lockable entrances
– Electric garage door openers
– Similar features
– Gates & locks at entrances
– Electric garage gate openers
YES
Handicap Accessibility Elevators shall be provided in
structures of 3 or more stories
All buildings required to be a
maximum of 2 floors;
Recreational Building has an
elevator
N/A

THERE ARE
NO 3-STORY

STRUCTURES

PROPOSED OR

ALLOWED
437
1 When recorded mail to:

City of Oxnard
300 W. Third Street, Suite 100E
Oxnard, CA 93030
Attn: City Clerk
______________________________________________________________________________ APN __________________

AGREEMENT AFFECTING REAL PROPERTY
(DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING

REQUIREMENTS)
This Agreement Affecting Real Property (Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Affordable Housing Requirements)(hereafter, “Agreement”) is made in Ventura County, California as of _______________, 2021, by and between Portofino Place, LLC (the “Owner”) and the City of Oxnard, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and collectively with the Owner as the “Parties”.

RECITALS
A. Owner is the owner of the 7.6 acre property located at the corner of 5th Street and Portofino Place in the City of Oxnard, County of Ventura, State of California more fully described in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Property”).

B. Owner has applied for four different planning entitlements (PZ No. 19-500-04 (Special Use Permit), PZ No. 20-300-02 (Tentative Subdivision Map), PZ No. 20-570-02 (Zone Change) and PZ No. 20-620-02 (General Plan Amendment)) that would allow for the development of 45 duplexes, consisting of 90 dwelling units, on the Property (hereinafter, the “Project”).

C. The City’s inclusionary housing ordinance has specific affordability requirements based upon the type of development – for-sale or for-rent. The City’s inclusionary housing ordinance requires for-sale projects with at least 10 or more units to reserve at least ten percent (10%) of all units to be sale to lower-income households (80% AMI), while the City’s inclusionary housing ordinance requires for-rent projects with at least 10 or more units to make available at least five percent (5%) of all units to very low income (50% AMI or below) households and five percent (5%) of all units to affordable lower-income (80% AMI) households.
438
2 D. While the Owner has indicated its intention to retain the title to all of the parcels within the Project and to make this a for-rent project, at such time as the final tract map has been recorded and the Owner has obtained the necessary approvals from the California Department of Real Estate, the Owner can sell individual parcels within the Project to third parties.

E. The Parties are entering into this Agreement in order to create a specific mechanism for Owner’s compliance with the City’s inclusionary housing ordinance while the Project is remains under a single ownership and is a for-rent development, while outlining specific steps to be followed before the Owner sells one or more of the parcels of the Project to a third party.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals which are hereby incorporated into the operative provisions of this Agreement by this reference and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the City and Owner agree as follows:

1. Conditions of Approval. On behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, Owner agrees to be bound by the conditions of approval for the Project, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit B.

2. Inclusionary Housing Regulations. On behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, Owner agrees to be bound by the City’s inclusionary housing regulations that exist as of the date of this Agreement.

3. For-Rent Development. On behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, Owner agrees that the Project shall be a for-rent development that shall comply with the City’s inclusionary housing regulations that exist as of the date of this Agreement.

4. Conversion to For-Sale Development. For twenty (20) years from the date that the first dwelling unit within the Project is offered for-rent, the Owner agrees that individual parcels within the Project may not be sold, traded or exchanged without the prior written consent of the City of Oxnard, which consent may not be withheld once Owner puts in place specific procedures consistent with the City’s inclusionary housing regulations to ensure that at least ten percent of the units in the Project will be sold to lower-income households (80% AMI) and that standard resale restrictions consistent with the City’s existing inclusionary housing regulations will be imposed on such sales.

5. Disclosure of Restrictions of Agreement. For a period of twenty (20) years from the first dwelling unit is offered for-rent within the Project, the Owner agrees that if it conveys the entire Project to a third party or another legal entity, the Owner will first fully disclose to the new owner(s) the requirements of the Project approvals and this Agreement.

6. Covenants Running with the Land. All the obligations and covenants of Owner hereunder shall be binding upon the successors, assigns, heirs, transferees, and future owner(s) of the Property or any portion thereof as covenants running with the land pursuant to California Civil Code Section 1460 et. seq.
439
3 7. Legal Interpretation of Instrument. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California with venue in Ventura County.

8. Entire Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, superseding all negotiations, prior discussions and preliminary agreements made prior to the date hereof. This Agreement may not be changed except in writing executed by both parties.

9. Authority to Execute Agreement. All individuals executing this and other documents on behalf of the parties certify and warrant that they have the capacity and have been duly authorized to so execute the documents on behalf of the entity so indicated.

10. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and all of its provisions in which performance is a factor.

11. Severability Clause. Any provision of this Agreement, which shall prove to be invalid, void, or illegal, shall in no way affect, impair, or invalidate any other provision hereof and such other provisions shall remain in full force and effect.

12. Section Headings. The section headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience and identification only and shall not be deemed to limit or define the contents to which they relate.

13. Counterparts. This Agreement and any modifications hereto may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same force and effect as if executed in the form of a single document.

14. Waiver. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought.

15. Assistance of Legal Counsel. All parties to this Agreement declare that, prior to the execution of this Agreement, they have informed themselves of sufficient relevant data, either through experts or other sources of their own selection, and have sought and obtained legal counsel, in order that they might intelligently exercise their own judgment in evaluating the contents of this Agreement and making the decision to execute it. The parties each represent and acknowledge that in executing this Agreement, they do not rely and have not relied upon any representation or statement not set forth herein made by any other party to this Agreement or their respective legal counsel with regard to the subject matter, basis or effect of this Agreement. 440
4 16. Notices. Any notice, request, information or other document to be given hereunder to any of the parties by any other parties shall be in writing, shall be sent via US mail and shall be deemed given and served upon delivery, if delivered personally, or three (3) business days after mailing by United States mail as follows:

If to CITY: City of Oxnard
300 W. Third Street, 4th Floor
Oxnard, CA 93030
Attn: City Clerk
With a copy to: City Attorney
City of Oxnard
305 W. Third Street, Suite 100E
Oxnard, CA 93030
If to OWNER: Portofino Place, LLC
Attn: John L. Carnesale, CEO
701 Shadow Lane #310
Las Vegas, NV 89106
Email: [email protected]
With a copy to: Kate Neiswender
P.O. Box 1225
Blue Jay, CA 92317
Email: [email protected]
Any party may change the address or persons to which notices are to be sent to it by giving the written notice that such change of address or persons to the other parties in the manner provided for giving notice.
17, Ambiguities Not to be Construed Against Drafting Party. The doctrine that any ambiguity contained in a contract shall be construed against the party whose counsel has drafted the contract is expressly waived by each of the parties hereto with respect to this Agreement, which shall be construed as if jointly prepared by the Parties. 441
5 CITY:

Dated: 2021 CITY OF OXNARD
By: __________________________________
ATTEST:
______________________________
Rose Chaparro, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:___________________________
Stephen Fischer
City Attorney
OWNER:

Dated: 2021 _____________________________________
442
6 EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
443

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Fidelity National Title Company
ORDERNO.: 00027933-017-LF-AL

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF OXNARD, COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: .

PARCEL 1, OF PARCEL MAP WAIVER NO. PZ 04-300-18, AS RECORDED ON FEBRUARY 25, 2005, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2005-47645, IN THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY BEING A PORTION OF PARCELS 1 THROUGH 6, INCLUSNE, IN THE CITY OF OXNARD, COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 23, PAGE 30 OF RECORDS OF SURVEYS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL OF THE OIL, GAS, HYDROCARBONS AND ASSOCIATED SUBSTANCES LYING

IN AND UNDER THE LAND HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED AS RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM HELEN UNDERHILL, ET AL., RECORDED SEPTEMBER 2, 1959 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 34233 IN BOOK 1774, PAGE 574 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

BY DEEDS RECORDED MAY 29, 1963 IN BOOK 2330, PAGES 532,530 AND 532 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, ALL RIGHTS TO USE THE SURFACE AND THE SUBSURFACE TO A DEPTH OF 500 FEET BENEATH THE SURFACE OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 WERE RELEASED.

BY QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED MARCH 12, 1964 IN BOOK 2498, PAGE 255 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS1 ALL RIGHTS TO USE THE SURFACE AND THE SUBSURFACE TO A DEPTH OF 500 FEET BENEATH THE SURFA€ E OF LOTS 4, 5 AND 6 WERE RELEASED.

APN: 185-0-221-025, 185-0-221-265, 185-0-223-015
J
..
444
7 EXHIBIT B

UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
Portofino Place Project
Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project
prepared by
City of Oxnard
Planning Division
214 South C Street
Oxnard, California 93030
Contact: Scott Kolwitz
prepared with the assistance of
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
180 North Ashwood Avenue
Ventura, California 93003
November 2021
463
464
Table of Contents
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project i
Table of Contents
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project............................................................................................................................................1

1. Introduction....................................................................................................................................1

2. Previous Environmental Review.....................................................................................................2

3. Project Description (Modified Project)...........................................................................................3

4. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required ....................................................................10

5. Impact Analysis.............................................................................................................................10 Aesthetics and Urban Design .......................................................................................................11 Agricultural Resources.................................................................................................................15 Air Quality ....................................................................................................................................17 Biological Resources.....................................................................................................................21 Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions.........................................................................23 Cultural Resources .......................................................................................................................29 Energy ..........................................................................................................................................31 Geology and Soils.........................................................................................................................33 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ...............................................................................................35 Hydrology and Water Quality ......................................................................................................39 Land Use and Planning.................................................................................................................43 Mineral Resources........................................................................................................................45 Noise ............................................................................................................................................47 Population, Education and Housing.............................................................................................49 Public Services and Recreation ....................................................................................................51 Transportation and Circulation....................................................................................................55 Tribal Cultural Resources.............................................................................................................59 Utilities.........................................................................................................................................61 Wildfire.........................................................................................................................................63 Cumulative Impacts......................................................................................................................65

6. Determination...............................................................................................................................67 References............................................................................................................................................69 465
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
ii
Tables
Table 1 Comparison of Permitted and Conditional Permitted Uses by Zoning ..................................4 Table 2 Comparison of Development Standards by Zoning................................................................7 Table 3 Comparison of Construction and Operational Emissions Generation..................................19 Table 4 SB 32 Scoping Plan Emissions Sector Targets.......................................................................25 Table 5 SB 32 Locally-Appropriate Project-Specific Threshold .........................................................26 Table 6 Comparison of Estimated GHG Emissions during Construction...........................................26 Table 7 Comparison of Combined Annual GHG Emissions ...............................................................27 Figures
Figure 1 Regional Location................................................................................................................8 Figure 2 Modified Project Site ..........................................................................................................9 Appendices
Appendix A Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2004 MND for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project
Appendix B California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0) Output 466
Introduction
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 1
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for
the 2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project

1. Introduction
This document is an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) that was prepared and adopted for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project in August of 2004.

This Addendum has been prepared in accordance with relevant provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 (as amended) and the State CEQA Guidelines as implemented by the City of Oxnard. According to Section 15164(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines, an addendum to a negative declaration is the appropriate environmental document in instances when “only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15261 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred.” Section 15162(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines states that no subsequent EIR (or negative declaration) shall be prepared for a project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

The changes to the original Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project by the Portofino Place Project (modified project) that are being proposed are minor and would not create potentially significant environmental impacts beyond those already identified in the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 467
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
2 Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (2004 MND). Also, the modified project would not substantially increase the magnitude or severity of significant impacts that were previously identified. This Addendum does not require public circulation because it does not provide significant new information that changes the 2004 MND in a way that deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse environmental effect of the modified project or a feasible way to mitigate or avoid such an effect.

This Addendum includes this introduction, a description of the modified project, and a comparison of the impacts for all environmental issue areas listed in the City of Oxnard CEQA Guidelines.

The City of Oxnard shall consider this Addendum with the 2004 MND prior to making a decision on the modified project. The MND is available for review on the City’s website and at the Planning & Environmental Services Division of the City of Oxnard Community Development Department, located at 214 South C Street, Oxnard, California 93030.

2. Previous Environmental Review
In 2004, an MND (No. 04-11) was prepared to evaluate commercial development on a 7.6-acre portion of the project site as well as residential development on an adjacent 10-acre property to the south of the site (“original project”). The 10-acre residential development involved the construction of 41 single family residences and the remaining 7.6-acre development involved the development of three commercial lots along 5th Street. A Tentative Tract Map (Tract No. 5640) was proposed to create the 44 lots (41 residential and 3 commercial) and included the construction of Portofino Place, portions of Dunkirk Drive, and two cul-de-sacs (Riviera Court and Quilan Court). The original project required a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designations for the site at that time from Business Research Park (BRP) to Low Residential (RL) for the 10-acre residential component, and from BRP to General Commercial (CG) for the remaining 7-acre commercial area. A Zone Change from Business and Research Park (BRP) to Single-Family Residential (R-1) and General Commercial (C-2) was also required for the original project. A Special Use Permit was proposed to entitle the proposed RL land use. Potential environmental impacts associated with the project were identified throughout the MND, along with applicable mitigation measures where necessary. There were no Significant and Unavoidable Impacts identified in the 2004 MND. The 2004 MND identified Potentially Significant Impacts, which could be reduced to Less Than Significant Impacts with Mitigation Incorporated, in the areas of air quality, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, and noise. All mitigation measures identified in the 2004 MND that are applicable to the proposed Portofino Place Project are listed in Appendix A of this addendum.

The General Plan Amendment from BRP to RL and the Zone Change from BRP to R-1 were approved for the 10-acre residential component of the original project. The Tentative Tract Map and Special Use Permit for the residential development were also approved. The 41 residential units were completed in 2006 along with all required infrastructure.

Existing 2030 General Plan Land Use Designation
The General Plan Amendment from BRP to CG was not approved for the commercial component of the original project, which encompasses the site of the current modified project. Accordingly, the lots included in the modified project currently have a General Plan land use designation of BRP and are undeveloped.
468
Project Description (Modified Project)
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 3
Existing Zoning
The Zone Change from BRP to C-2 also was not approved for the commercial component of the original project. The lots included in the modified project are currently zoned BRP.

3. Project Description (Modified Project)
The proposed Portofino Place Project (modified project) involves a modification to the 2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (original project) that would replace the commercial component of the original project with 90 condominium units on the project site. The 7.6-acre site of the proposed condominium units is located at the corner of 5th Street and Portofino Place in the City of Oxnard and includes Assessor Parcel Numbers (APN) 185-0-221-025, 185-0-221-265, and 185-0-223- 015. The proposed 90 units would provide 130,005 square feet of living area. The project also includes development of a 3,281 square-foot recreation building as well as entry gates and private roads for circulation within the project site.

The modified project requires a General Plan Amendment to change the existing land use designation from BRP to Low-Medium Residential (RLM), a Zone Change from BRP to Multi-Family Residential (R-2), a Tentative Condominium Map to create two lots and new roads, and a Special Use Permit to entitle the project. The proposed R-2 zoning would provide for an allowable density of one unit per 3,500 square-feet, or a total of 94 units on the project site (4 more than the 90 units proposed).

Table 1 summarizes the differences between the permitted and conditionally permitted uses under the existing and proposed zoning. Table 2 compares the development standards under the existing and proposed zoning.
469
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
4 Table 1 Comparison of Permitted and Conditional Permitted Uses by Zoning Use Type Existing Zoning – BRP Proposed Zoning – R-2
Permitted Uses
Residential ▪ None ▪ Multiple-family dwelling units, either in separate buildings or combined in one or more main building
▪ Congregate living health facilities of no more than six beds ▪ Farmworker housing
▪ Large family day care homes
▪ Residential care facilities for the elderly serving no more than six persons ▪ Accessory dwelling units
▪ Single-family dwelling - Conventionally built single-family dwellings of a permanent character
▪ Supportive housing
▪ Short-term rentals
Other ▪ Administrative, executive, and/or corporate offices which are a part of a predominantly industrial operation, including governmental offices and facilities
▪ Administrative, financial, professional, medical, and general office services
▪ Adult businesses, except adult motels
▪ Adult day care facilities
▪ Agricultural, limited to growing of crops
▪ Aircraft sales
▪ Ambulance base facilities
▪ Auction houses
▪ Book binding
▪ Business furniture, supplies, and equipment sales
▪ Cafeterias accessory to permitted uses for the convenience of persons employed on the premises
▪ Coffee shops, cafes
▪ Computer and business machine sales and service
▪ Corporate training and professional development facilities including ancillary outdoor activities
▪ Distribution, warehousing, and wholesaling
▪ Electronic and computer repair
▪ Employment agencies
▪ Florists
▪ Accessory buildings, including other uses customarily incidental to a permitted use
▪ Adult day care facilities serving no more than six adults ▪ Babysitting
▪ Childcare centers serving no more than six children
▪ Grounds, private greenhouses and horticultural collections, flower and vegetable gardens and fruit trees, not grown expressly for profit ▪ Off-street parking
▪ Signs
▪ Small residential health or care facilities
▪ Storage, incidental to permitted uses, provided such storage is contained within an accessory building
▪ Traditional bed and breakfast
470
Project Description (Modified Project)
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 5
Use Type Existing Zoning – BRP Proposed Zoning – R-2
▪ Garment manufacturing
▪ General office, including legal, professional, medical, consulting, or similar
▪ Laboratories, research only
▪ Manufacture and assembly of electrical and electronic instruments, devices, and components
▪ Medical product sales
▪ Photographic studios and services
▪ Printing shop, lithographing, photocopying, blueprinting, and publishing
▪ Product assembly plants and production facilities primarily engaged in final or partial assembling of packaging of
premanufactured, treated, or fabricated components, materials, or products
▪ Radio or television broadcasting station
▪ Research and development, experimental or developmental laboratories
▪ Research, development, and clinical laboratories and uses including associated incidental and outpatient clinics
▪ Restaurants and delicatessens
▪ Stationery and office supplies
▪ Trade schools, public and private schools and colleges, dance, and performing arts studios
Conditionally Permitted Uses*
Residential ▪ None ▪ Condominiums
▪ Congregate living health facilities of more than 15 beds ▪ Convents serving no more than 15 persons
▪ Residential care facilities for the elderly serving no more than 15 persons ▪ Residential stock cooperatives and community apartments ▪ Those related uses listed in the R-1 zone
▪ Senior and/or senior assisted living residential facility 471
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
6 Use Type Existing Zoning – BRP Proposed Zoning – R-2
Other ▪ Alcohol sales: on-site, off-site, and wine tasting ▪ Assisted living residential facility
▪ Breweries, microbrew (less than 60,000 barrels)
▪ Breweries, craft (more than 60,000 barrels, less than 2 million barrels)
▪ Children’s day care facility serving more than 15 children ▪ Churches
▪ Commercial and retail uses
▪ Distribution
▪ Manufacturing
▪ Retail
▪ Testing
▪ Commercial recreational and entertainment uses, such as batting cages, gymnasiums, boxing gyms, escape rooms, bowling alleys, skating rinks, and similar recreational uses
▪ Convenience markets and drugstores
▪ Day care facilities accessory to industrial uses
▪ Day care facilities (over 12 children) as a principal use ▪ Drive-through services
▪ Energy generation, distribution, storage, and support facilities, including electrical and gas utilities
▪ Medical: hospitals and medical centers
▪ Motels, hotels, and convention facilities
▪ Public service uses - communications, fire and police, water, and other governmental or public facilities
▪ Specialized commercial retail centers oriented toward major transportation elements such as freeways, expressways, and other major transportation corridors. Specialized commercial uses include promotional, discount, factory outlet, and off-price shopping centers, as well as centers that are tourist-oriented or oriented to other specialized markets. Specialized commercial uses may also include general commercial uses in special or unique settings
▪ Vehicle rental agencies
▪ Vehicle service stations
▪ Wine tasting with or without cafes
▪ Adult day care facilities serving no more than 15 adults ▪ Childcare centers serving no more than 15 children
▪ Emergency shelters for families
▪ Private or parochial schools, except those of a correctional nature or those intended for the mentally retarded or insane
▪ Public or private parks and playgrounds
▪ Public schools, elementary, junior high, high school, colleges *Allowable with Special Use Permit (SUP) or Development Design Review Permit (DDR), as specified in Section 16-163 of the Oxnard City Code 472
Project Description (Modified Project)
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 7
Table 2 Comparison of Development Standards by Zoning
Project Characteristics BRP Development Standards R-2 Development Standards Lot Area and Density 20,000 square feet minimum 3,500 square feet minimum per dwelling unit, with no more than six units per
building;
7,000 square feet minimum for lots
containing more than one unit.

Lot Width Interior lots – 100 feet minimum
Corner lots – 150 feet minimum
50 feet minimum
Front Yard Setback 30 feet; 40 feet when adjacent to
designated thoroughfare
25% of the lot depth (not to exceed 60 feet,
but not less than 25 feet)
Side Yard Setback Equal to height of building unless otherwise permitted by a Special Use Permit
10% of the lot width (not to exceed five feet,
but not less than three feet)
Rear Yard Setback 20 feet 25% of the lot depth
Height 35 feet; additional height may be allowed
with approval of a Special Use Permit
Two stories, not to exceed 25 feet
Lot Coverage* 25% 25%
Parking** Varies by use type Varies by use type
* Project site located within traffic pattern zone of the Oxnard Airport, limiting the overall development density to a maximum of 25 percent structural coverage of the site.
** Parking requirements for specific use types are detailed in Section 16-622 of the Oxnard City Code.

Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
The lots included in the modified project lie within the traffic pattern zone of the Oxnard Airport, limiting the overall development density to a maximum of 25 percent structural coverage of the site. The modified project would be consistent with this density restriction. The project site is bounded on the north by multi-tenant industrial uses and a storage facility, Juan Lagunas Soria Elementary School to the east, residential development to the south, and properties zoned General Commercial – Planned Development and currently under development to the west.

Figure 1 shows the regional location of the project site within the City of Oxnard and Figure 2 shows the modified project site location.
473
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
8 Figure 1 Regional Location
474
Project Description (Modified Project)
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 9
Figure 2 Modified Project Site
475
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
10 4. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required
The modified project would be required to be filed with and undergo review by the Federal Aviation Administration pursuant to the requirements of Mitigation Measure G-2 of the 2004 MND, which is applicable to development of the project site.

5. Impact Analysis
The modified project was reviewed in relation to the 2004 MND and current baseline environmental conditions in this Addendum, which considers all issues on the City’s Initial Study (IS) Checklist. The proposed Portofino Place Project would result in generally the same development footprint as what was analyzed in the 2004 MND and would be subject to applicable federal, state, and local regulatory measures. For all issue areas, this Addendum concludes that that modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts than those identified in the 2004 MND. This Addendum also concludes that none of the conditions that trigger the need to prepare a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration would occur. The Addendum also expands upon the analysis in the 2004 MND for several issues that have undergone recent legislative or other updates. These include air quality, climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, energy, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, recreation, transportation and circulation, tribal cultural resources, and wildfire.
476
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Aesthetics and Urban Design
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 11
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Aesthetics and Urban
Design Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would the modified project have a
substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista such as an ocean or
mountain view from an important
view corridor or location as
identified in the 2030 General Plan
or other City planning documents?
Discussion 1-
3, Section A.

Aesthetics
No No No

2. Would the modified project
substantially damage scenic
resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings,
and historic buildings within a state
scenic highway, or route identified
as scenic by the County of Ventura
or City of Oxnard?
Discussion 1-
3, Section A.

Aesthetics
No No No

3. Would the modified project
substantially degrade the existing
visual character or quality of the
site or its surroundings such as by
creating new development or other
physical changes that are visually
incompatible with surrounding
areas or that conflict with visual
resource policies contained in the
2030 General Plan or other City
planning documents?
Discussion 1-
3, Section A.

Aesthetics
No No No

4. Would the modified project add to
or compound an existing negative
visual character associated with the
project site?
Discussion 1-
3, Section A.

Aesthetics
No No No
477
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
12 Aesthetics and Urban
Design Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

5. Would the modified project create
a source of substantial light or glare
that would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
Discussion 4,
Section A.

Aesthetics
No No No
Discussion
The lots comprising the modified project site have a General Plan land use designation of Business Research Park and zoning of Business and Research Park (BRP) and are currently undeveloped. The modified project site is located in an urban area and surrounded by a variety of uses, including industrial facilities, a storage facility, an elementary school, residential development, and properties currently undergoing development for commercial activity. The modified project site is surrounded by existing development, parking areas, and roadways that provide lighting and potential sources of glare on the site.

According to the 2004 MND, development facilitated by the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project would be consistent with surrounding urban uses and would not result in either impacts to scenic vistas or scenic resources or impacts related to light and glare. However, the changed use under the modified project is analyzed further below to determine the level of impacts to the aesthetics and urban character of the project area in comparison the development of the project site under the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project. 1-2) The proposed residential development does not constitute the type of urban landscape considered an important aesthetic resource in the City’s 2030 General Plan. Therefore, changes to the appearance of the modified project site from surrounding public viewpoints, primarily surrounding roadways, due to the modified project would not result in an adverse effect on a scenic vista. The modified project site is not located within view of any natural scenic resources within the City including beaches, coastline, agricultural areas, and parks. Therefore, development of the modified project site would not have a substantial adverse effect on any identified scenic vistas.

The modified project site is not visible from any designated State Scenic Highways. According to Section 5.3.2 of the Background Report for the 2030 General Plan, 5 th Street between Mandalay
Beach Road and Revelon Slough, from which the modified project site is visible, is included in the City’s designated Scenic Highway/Roadway System. According to 2030 General Plan Goal CD-9.4, View Corridor Preservations, a landscaped buffer corridor of at least 30 feet deep is required along designated scenic corridors and other major transportation corridors. Views of the modified project site from 5
th Street are dominated by the existing landscape trees along the perimeter of the site.

Views from 5th Street also include partial views of the undeveloped site, which contains ruderal vegetation, as well as partial views of the properties that are developed with urban uses surrounding the site. The modified project would involve two-story condominium units of height similar to existing, adjacent residences and the commercial uses evaluated in the 2004 MND for the project site. No scenic resources that would be blocked or adversely impacted by the modified project are prominently visible on or through the modified project site from 5 th Avenue. Therefore,
478
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Aesthetics and Urban Design
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 13
the modified project would not result in a substantial damage to scenic resources within a state or local scenic route.

In summary, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts to scenic vistas or other scenic resources when compared to the commercial uses evaluated in the 2004 MND for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project. The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts to scenic vistas or scenic resources, and none are required for the modified project.
3-4) The proposed condominium units would be a maximum of two stories and would provide front, rear, and side setbacks, consistent with the underlying commercial zoning for the site. The proposed units would be designed to complement the urban character of surrounding uses. The proposed development would also include parking and landscaping features around the new buildings to enhance the site’s visual character and would be subject to the City’s design review process to ensure consistency with the City’s goals, policies, and design guidelines. The modified project would be visually compatible with the character and quality of the surrounding urban development and consistent with City visual resource policies. Therefore, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts to scenic quality or character of the project area when compared to the previously approved BRP uses or commercial uses that were evaluated in the 2004 MND. The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts to scenic quality or character, and none are required for the modified project. 5) New sources of lighting associated with the modified project would include security and street lighting similar to that of the surrounding development and would be required to comply with Section 16-320 of the Oxnard City Code, which specifies on-site lighting requirements that are applicable in all zones of the City. The modified project would also be developed in a location that is surrounded by existing development and not unusually prominent in views from surrounding roadways or other public viewpoints. The modified project would not include any sources of highintensity lighting. As a standard condition of approval, all proposed lighting would be subject to the City’s review and approval process, which includes the preparation of a photometric plan for the modified project. The photometric plan has been prepared in conformance with City standards for the project. Due to the existing ambient light conditions in the surrounding area and compliance with the City’s lighting requirements and review processes, the modified project would not create a source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area.

Therefore, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts related to light and glare when compared to the previously approved BRP uses or commercial uses evaluated in the 2004 MND. The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts related to light and glare, and none are required for the modified project. 479
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
14 This page intentionally left blank.
480
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Agricultural Resources
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 15
Agricultural
Resources
Where Impact
Was Analyzed in
the 2004 MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would the modified project
convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of
Statewide Importance to nonagricultural use?
Discussion 1-3,
Section B.

Agricultural
Resources
No No No

2. Would the modified project
conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use or an existing
Williamson Act contract?
Discussion 1-3,
Section B.

Agricultural
Resources
No No No

3. Would the modified project
involve other changes in the
existing environment that, due to
their location or nature, could
result in conversion of off-site
farmland to non-agricultural use?
Discussion 1-3,
Section B.

Agricultural
Resources
No No No
Discussion
The project site and surrounding area is not used for agricultural purposes. The project site and properties surrounding the site are not zoned for agricultural use and are not included in a Williamson Act Contract. As discussed in the 2004 MND, the City of Oxnard 2020 General Plan designates the modified project site for urban use and the site is within the City’s Urban Restriction Boundary.
1-3) Impacts to agricultural resources as a result of development on the modified project site would be the same as impacts of the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project evaluated in the 2004 MND. The project would not result in any new or substantially more severe impacts to agricultural resources. The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts to agricultural resources and none are required for the modified project. 481
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
16 This page intentionally left blank.
482
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Air Quality
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 17
Air Quality
Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would the modified project conflict
with or obstruct implementation of
the Ventura County AQMP?
Discussion 1-
4, Section C.

Air Quality
No No No

2. Would the modified project violate
a federal or state air quality
standard or contribute substantially
to an existing or projected air
quality standard violation?
Discussion 1-
4, Section C.

Air Quality
No No No

3. Would the modified project result
in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria in excess of
quantitative thresholds
recommended by the VCAPCD)?
Discussion 1-
4, Section C.

Air Quality
No No No

4. Would the modified project expose
sensitive receptors to pollutant
concentrations exceeding state or
federal standards or in excess of
applicable health risk criteria for
toxic air contaminants?
Discussion 1-
4, Section C.

Air Quality
No No No

5. Would the modified project create
objectionable odors affecting a
substantial number of people?
Discussion 5,
Section C. Air
Quality
No No No
Discussion
The modified project site is located in the South Central Coast Air Basin (SCCAB), which includes all of Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo counties. The SCCAB is currently a nonattainment area for both the federal and State standards for ozone and the State standard for PM10.

Project-generated emissions were estimated for the development of the modified project site under the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project as well as the modified project based on the proposed land use assumptions and vehicle emissions factors using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod; Version 2020.4.0). CalEEMod data output is included in Appendix B.

The changes to air quality emissions resulting from development of the commercial development in comparison to the proposed condominium project are detailed in the discussions of construction and operational impacts below.

According to the 2004 MND, development facilitated by the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project would potentially result in short-term impacts to air quality as a result of grading and other project construction activities. The 2004 MND for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project did not evaluate the components of the redevelopment project on an individual basis. Accordingly, the changed use and development density under the modified project is analyzed further below to 483
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
18 determine the level of impacts to air quality in comparison the development of the project site under the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project.
1) According to the Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines (Ventura County Air Pollution Control District [VCAPCD] 2003), a project must conform to the local general plan and must not result in or contribute to an exceedance of the County’s projected population growth forecast in order to be consistent with the AQMP. Based on the California Department of Finance (DOF) 2021 population and housing estimates, the City had a total population of 204,675 people and an average household size of 3.86 persons in January 2021. Based on the average household size, the 90 proposed residential units included in the modified project would accommodate approximately 348 people. This would result in a total population of 205,023 people in the City. VCAPCD’s AQMP utilizes regional population and employment forecasts developed by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). SCAG’s 2016–2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy growth forecast projects a population of 237,300 people in the City in 2040.

The total population in the City with implementation of the modified project would not exceed SCAG’s most recent growth projections for the City. As such, the growth forecast is also within the population growth parameters considered in the AQMP. Therefore, development of the modified project would not obstruct implementation of the AQMP or attainment of State or federal air quality standards or otherwise result in a new or more severe impact or mitigation measures when compared to the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project evaluated in the 2004 MND. 2-3)
Construction Emissions
The modified project would generate temporary construction emissions. The primary source of reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrogen oxides (NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), and sulfur oxides (SOX) emissions is from internal combustion of construction equipment exhaust and on-road haul-truck trips, while the majority of particulate matter emissions occur as a result of fugitive dust emissions generated during grading and excavation activities. Primary sources of PM10 and PM2.5 emissions are clearing activities, excavation and grading operations, construction vehicle traffic on unpaved ground, and wind blowing over exposed earth surfaces. VCAPCD’s Air Quality Assessment Guidelines recommend significance thresholds for projects proposed in Ventura County. Under these guidelines, projects that generate more than 25 pounds per day (lb/day) of ROG or NOX individually and cumulatively jeopardize attainment of the federal ozone standard and thus have a significant adverse impact on air quality. However, VCAPCD’s 25 lbs/day thresholds for ROG and NOX do not apply to construction emissions because construction emissions are not permanent. Nevertheless, for construction impacts, the VCAPCD recommends imposition of mitigation if emissions of either pollutant exceed 25 lb/day. The VCAPCD requires minimizing fugitive dust through various dust control measures as documented in Rule 55.

Construction emissions were estimated for the original commercial development and the modified project based on the land uses included in each and vehicle emissions factors using CalEEMod (refer to Appendix B). A comparison of the estimated construction and operational emissions are shown in Table 3.
484
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Air Quality
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 19
Table 3 Comparison of Construction and Operational Emissions Generation Maximum Emissions (lb/day)
VCAPCD
Threshold
Threshold
ROG NOX Exceeded?
Original Commercial Development
Construction 38.6 33.1 N/A No
Operations 10.5 8.7 25 lb/day No
Modified Project
Construction 67.9 33.1 N/A No
Operations 5.7 3.2 25 lb/day No
Source: CalEEMod output, Appendix B
As shown in Table 3, the modified project would result in higher emissions of ROG from construction and lower emissions of ROG and NOX from project operation than the commercial development included in the original project. Neither the approved nor modified project would result in emissions exceeding VCAPCD thresholds.

As with the commercial development included in the original project, the modified project would be required to implement applicable standard VCAPCD emissions control measures, including construction equipment controls, such as minimizing idle time, maintaining equipment engines, using alternatively fueled equipment, and minimizing the number of pieces of equipment operated simultaneously. Additionally, construction activities would be required to adhere to the VCAPCD Rule 50 for Opacity and Rule 51 for Nuisance. As determined for the original project in the 2004 MND, compliance with the required VCAPCD measures would reduce potential air pollutant emissions associated with construction. The modified project would also be subject to Mitigation Measures C-1 through C-8 from the 2004 MND, which include additional requirements and specifications to further reduce air pollutant emissions from construction activities.

Operational Emissions
Operational emissions associated with the modified project would be generated by both stationary and mobile sources as a result of normal operations of a residential development. Stationary emissions would be generated by the consumption of natural gas for space and water heating equipment. Mobile emissions would be generated by vehicles traveling to and from the modified project site. Project-generated operational emissions were estimated based on the proposed land use assumptions and vehicle emissions factors using CalEEMod. As shown in Table 3, modified project operation would generate up to 5.7 lb/day of ROG and 3.2 lb/day of NOX. These emissions would not exceed the VCAPCD significance thresholds of 25 lb/day and are lower than operational emissions from the original project. The modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts to air quality when compared to development of the modified project site under the 2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project.

With regard to determining the significance of the modified project’s contribution to air quality violations, the VCAPCD neither recommends quantified analyses of cumulative operational emissions nor provides methodologies or threshold of significance to be used to assess cumulative construction or operational impacts. Instead, the VCAPCD recommends that a project’s contribution to cumulative impacts should be assessed utilizing the same significance criteria as those for project 485
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
20 specific impacts. Therefore, if implementation of the modified project would generate operational emissions that exceed the VCAPCD-recommended daily thresholds for project-specific impacts, then the modified project would also cause a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions for those pollutants for which SCCAB is in nonattainment. As previously discussed, operational daily emissions associated with the modified project would not exceed VCAPCD significance thresholds and the modified project would not result in cumulatively considerable increase in emissions for which SCCAB is in nonattainment.

In summary, with implementation of Mitigation Measures C-1 through C-8 from the 2004 MND, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts to air quality beyond those identified in the 2004 MND.
4) Construction of the modified project would result in temporary emissions of diesel particulate matter (DPM), which consists of exhaust PM2.5 and PM10 and is a Toxic Air Contaminant (TAC). The modified project would be required to comply with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Airborne Toxic Control Measures’ anti-idling measure, which limits idling to no more than five minutes at any location for diesel-fueled commercial vehicles, as well as the required and applicable Best Available Control Technology and the In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation to avoid and/or reduce emissions of DPM associated with project construction to the maximum extent possible. Given that the modified project consists of a residential development, it would not include unique sources of substantive TAC emissions identified by the VCAPCD- or CARB-siting recommendations. Therefore, the modified project would not expose sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations exceeding state or federal standards or in excess of applicable health risk criteria for TACs and would not exacerbate existing environmental conditions associated with DPM emissions at the site from heavily trafficked roadways in the vicinity of the modified project site. The 2004 MND included mitigation for potential impacts to air quality as a result of construction on the project site. However, with implementation of the required CARB DPM control measures, no additional mitigation measures would be required for modified project. 5) Land uses likely to produce objectionable odors include agriculture, chemical plants, composting operations, dairies, fiberglass molding, landfills, refineries, rendering plants, rail yards, and wastewater treatment plants. The modified project would not involve development or operation of any of these types of uses. Potential activities that may emit odors during project construction activities include the use of architectural coatings and solvents and the combustion of diesel fuel in on- and off-road equipment. VCAPCD Rule 74.2 would limit the amount of ROGs in architectural coatings and solvents. In addition, project construction activities would be required comply with the applicable provisions of the CARB Air Toxics Control Measure regarding idling limitations for diesel trucks. Through mandatory compliance with VCAPCD rules and CARB idling limitation, construction activities would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Therefore, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts related to odors when compared to the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project evaluated in the 2004 MND. No mitigation was required in the 2004 MND and none would be required for the modified project. 486
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Biological Resources
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 21
Biological Resources
Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would the modified project have a
substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive,
or special-status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Discussion 1-
6, Section D.

Biological
Resources
No No No

2. Would the modified project have a
substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in
local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations adopted by the
California Department of Wildlife
and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
Discussion 1-
6, Section D.

Biological
Resources
No No No

3. Would the modified project have a
substantial adverse effect on
federally protected waters of the
U.S. as defined by Section 404 of
the federal Clean Water Act or
protected waters of the state as
defined by Section 1600 et seq. of
the California Fish and Game Code
(including, but not limited to,
marshes, vernal pools, and coastal
wetlands) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or
other means?
Discussion 1-
6, Section D.

Biological
Resources
No No No

4. Would the modified project
interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or
with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife
nursery sites?
Discussion 1-
6, Section D.

Biological
Resources
No No No
487
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
22 Biological Resources
Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

5. Would the modified project conflict
with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources?
Discussion 1-
6, Section D.

Biological
Resources
No No No

6. Would the modified project conflict
with an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or
other approved local, regional, or
state habitat conservation plan?
Discussion 1-
6, Section D.

Biological
Resources
No No No
Discussion
The lots comprising the modified project site are currently undeveloped and located in an urban area of the City of Oxnard. According to the 2004 MND, no known special status plant or animal species, sensitive natural communities, or wildlife corridors are present on or in the immediate vicinity of the project site.
1-6) Biological conditions on the project site have not changed since the analysis of the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project in the 2004 MND. No candidate, sensitive, or special status species are known to inhabit the modified project site. The City of Oxnard 2030 General Plan does not identify environmentally sensitive habitat, wetlands, riparian corridors, or migratory corridors on, or within the vicinity of, the project site. No native plant communities or areas of unique or sensitive habitat identified in local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans are located within the vicinity of the project site. Development on the modified project site would also be subject to the same uniformly applied conditions of approval for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project for removal of any trees from the project site, requiring the economic appraisal value of the trees removed be put back into new upgraded tree sizes for the project in addition to meeting the City’s minimum tree size of 24” box. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts to biological resources than those determined in the 2004 MND. The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts to biological resources and none are required for the modified project.
488
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 23
Climate Change and
Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Where Impact
Was Analyzed in
the 2004 MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would the modified project
generate greenhouse gas
emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the
environment?
N/A; New
CEQA checklist
item added
subsequent to
2004 MND
No No No

2. Would the modified project
conflict with an applicable plan,
policy or regulation adopted for
the purpose of reducing the
emissions of greenhouse gases or
otherwise conflict with the state
goal or reducing greenhouse gas
emissions in California?
N/A; New
CEQA checklist
item added
subsequent to
2004 MND
No No No

3. Would the modified project
contribute or be subject to
potential secondary effects of
climate change (e.g., sea level rise,
increase fire hazard)?
N/A; New
CEQA checklist
item added
subsequent to
2004 MND
No No No
Discussion
The 2004 MND did not address greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate change, because these checklist questions were not included in Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines or the City’s IS Checklist at the time the MND analysis was prepared. Therefore, the analysis below determines the level of impacts for the modified project relative to the most current GHG emissions targets and with consideration of the development envisioned for the project site under the original project. 1-3) In response to an increase in man-made GHG concentrations over the past 150 years, California has implemented Assembly Bill (AB) 32, the “California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.” AB 32 codifies the Statewide goal of reducing emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 (essentially a 15 percent reduction below 2005 emission levels) and the adoption of regulations to require reporting and verification of statewide GHG emissions. In 2016, the governor signed Senate Bill (Senate Bill) 32 into law, which requires the State to further reduce GHGs to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030.

SB 32 is an extension of AB 32. The other provisions of AB 32 remain unchanged.

On December 14, 2017, CARB adopted the 2017 Scoping Plan, which provides a framework for achieving the 2030 GHG emissions reduction target established by SB 32. To meet reduction targets, the 2017 Scoping Plan relies on the continuation and expansion of existing policies and regulations, such as the Cap-and-Trade Program, as well as implementation of policies such as SB 350 and SB 1383. SB 350, the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015, has two objectives: to increase the procurement of electricity from renewable sources from 33 percent to 50 percent by 2030 and to double the energy efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas final end uses of retail 489
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
24 customers through energy efficiency and conservation. Adopted in September 2016, SB 1383 requires CARB to approve and begin implementing a comprehensive strategy to reduce emissions of short-lived climate pollutants and requires CalRecycle, in consultation with ARB, to adopt regulations that achieve specified targets for reducing organic waste in landfills. The 2017 Scoping Plan also puts an increased emphasis on innovation, adoption of existing technology, and strategic investment to support its strategies.

The 2017 Scoping Plan does not provide project-level thresholds for land use development. Instead, it recommends that local governments adopt policies and locally-appropriate quantitative thresholds consistent with a statewide per capita goal of six metric tons (MT) CO2e by 2030 and two MT CO2e by 2050 (CARB 2017). As stated in the 2017 Scoping Plan, these goals are appropriate for plan-level analyses (city, county, subregional, or regional level), but not for specific individual projects because they include all emissions sectors in the State. In the United States, most of the emissions of human-caused GHG emissions come from burning fossil fuels for energy use in transportation and electricity generation (U.S. Energy Information Administration 2017); therefore, per capita GHG emissions reduction goals would be expected to result in corresponding reductions in per capita energy consumption.

A project-specific efficiency threshold can be calculated by dividing statewide GHG emissions by the sum of statewide jobs and residents. However, not all statewide emission sources would be affected by the proposed land use (e.g., agriculture and industrial). Accordingly, consistent with the concerns raised in the Golden Door (2018) and Newhall Ranch (2015) decisions regarding the correlation between state and local conditions, the 2030 statewide inventory target was modified with substantial evidence provided to establish a locally-appropriate, evidence-based, commercial project-specific threshold consistent with the SB 32 target.

To develop this threshold, the local planning area was first evaluated to determine emissions sectors that are present and would be directly affected by potential land-use changes. The Agricultural and Industrial Sector source emissions (i.e., oil, gas, and hydrogen production; refineries; general fuel use; and mining operations) would not be directly affected by the proposed residences; therefore, these sectors were removed from the State 2030 emissions forecast to retain a more conservative locally-appropriate target. Additionally, Cap and Trade emissions reductions occur independent of any local jurisdictional land use decisions and were also excluded from the locally-appropriate target. After removing Agricultural, Industrial, and Cap and Trade emissions, the remaining emissions sectors with sources in the planning area were summed to create a locallyappropriate emissions total for a residential project in Oxnard. This locally-appropriate emissions total is divided by the statewide 2030 service person population to determine a locally-appropriate, project-level threshold of 3.2 MT of CO2e per service population that is consistent with SB 32 targets, as shown in Table 4 and Table 5.
490
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 25
Table 4 SB 32 Scoping Plan Emissions Sector Targets
GHG Emissions Sector1
2030 State
Emissions
Target
(MMT)1
Locally
Appropriate2
Project
Specific Major Sources3
Residential and Commercial 38 Yes Yes Natural gas end uses, including space and water heating of buildings
Electric Power 53 Yes Yes Electricity uses, including lighting, appliances, machinery and heating
High GWP 11 Yes Yes SF6 from power stations, HFCs from
refrigerants and air conditioning4
Recycling and Waste 8 Yes Yes Waste generated by residential, commercial, and other facilities
Transportation 103 Yes Yes Passenger, heavy duty, and other vehicle emissions
Industrial 83 No No Oil, gas, and hydrogen production,
refineries, general fuel use, and mining
operations do not occur substantially
within the City and would not be allowed
under the proposed RRSP amendments5
Agriculture 24 No No Enteric fermentation, crop residue burning, and manure management do not
occur substantially within the City and
would not be allowed under the proposed
RRSP amendments
Cap and Trade Reductions -60 No No Reductions from facilities emitting more than 10,000 MT CO2e per year6
Scoping Plan Target (All Sectors) 260 No No All emissions sectors Locally Inapplicable Sector
(Industrial)
-83 No No Oil, gas, and hydrogen production,
refineries, general fuel use, and mining
operations5
Locally Inapplicable Sector
(Agriculture)
-24 No No Enteric fermentation, crop residue
burning, and manure management
Locally Inapplicable Sector
(Cap and Trade)
60 No No Reductions from facilities emitting more
than 10,000 MT CO2e per year6
2030 Locally Applicable
Emissions Sectors
213 Yes Yes Emissions applicable to the local
planning area
MMT = million metric tons
1 All State targets in MMT CO2e. See the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, page 31 for sector details (CARB 2017). 2 Locally-appropriate is defined as having significant emissions in Scoping Plan Categorization categories within the planning area. 3 See CARB GHG Emissions Inventory Scoping Plan Categorization for details, available at:
https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm
4 SF6 is used primarily as an insulator in electrical substations while HFCs can be found in many residential and commercial refrigeration and air conditioning units. HFCs are in the process of being phased out through 2036 in most developed countries. 5 The majority of this sector is not applicable to the local planning area, and any potential applicable subsectors cannot be disaggregated due to CARB accounting methods. Therefore, the entire sector has been removed to ensure a more conservative target. 6 Cap and Trade is excluded as reductions will occur independent of local project land use decisions and are therefore not locally appropriate.
491
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
26 Table 5 SB 32 Locally-Appropriate Project-Specific Threshold California 2017 Climate
Change Scoping Plan
California 2030 Population (persons)1 43,939,250
California 2030 Employment Projection (persons)2 23,459,500 Service Population (persons) 67,398,750
Locally-Appropriate
2030 Project Threshold
2030 Locally-Appropriate Emissions Sectors (MT of CO2e) 213,000,000 2030 Service Population (persons) 67,398,750
2030 Service Person Target (MT of CO2e per Service Person) 3.22 1 California Department of Finance 2018
2 Average of employment range projections under implementation scenario. See CARB 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update, page 55 (CARB 2017).
3Total of 3.16 has been rounded up per Scoping Plan general methodology. Lead agencies may determine this threshold as they deem appropriate.

Construction of either the original project or the modified project would generate GHG emissions through the combustion of fossil fuels by heavy-duty construction equipment and through vehicle trips generated by construction workers, vendors, and residents traveling to and from the project site. Based on CalEEMod results, a comparison of the estimated GHG emissions from construction of the original and modified projects are shown in Table 6.

Table 6 Comparison of Estimated GHG Emissions during Construction Original Project Emissions
(MT of CO2e)
Modified Project Emissions
(MT of CO2e)
Construction Period 388.1 409.0
Amortized over 30 years 12.9 13.6
Notes: All emissions modeling was completed using CalEEMod. See Appendix B for modeling results. Some numbers may not sum exactly due to rounding.

New development on the modified project site would generate long-term GHG emissions from new vehicle trips (mobile emissions), combustion of natural gas and use of electricity (energy emissions), solid waste disposal, water use and wastewater generation, and consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment (area emissions). Based on the San Diego Association of Governments estimated building area per employee for retail uses of 588 square feet per employee, the original potential 82,764 square foot commercial space would include an estimated 141 employees per day, which represents the assumed service population for the original project. Based on the DOF 2020 population and housing estimates, the City had an average household size of 3.86 persons in January 2021. Using the average household size, the 90 proposed residential units included in the project would accommodate approximately 348 people, which represents the assumed service population for the modified project. Table 7 provides a comparison of the combined construction, operational, and mobile GHG emissions associated with the original project and modified project.
492
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 27
Table 7 Comparison of Combined Annual GHG Emissions
Emission Source
Original Project Emissions
(MT of CO2e)
Modified Project Emissions
(MT of CO2e)
Construction 12.9 13.6
Operational
Area
Energy
Solid Waste
Water
< 0.1
173.0

43.7 30.0

1.1 165.8

30.2 29.9
Mobile 1,774.6 607.6
Total Emissions 2,034.3 848.2
Service Population 141 348
Emissions per Service Population (MT CO2e/SP/year) 14.4 2.4 Project-Specific Efficiency Threshold (MT CO2e/SP/year) 3.2 3.2 Exceed Project-Specific Threshold? Yes No
See Appendix B for CalEEMod results. Some numbers may not sum exactly due to rounding.

As shown in Table 7, combined annual GHG emissions from the modified development would be approximately 2.4 MT of CO2e per service person per year, which would not exceed the locallyappropriate, project-specific threshold of 3.2 MT of CO2e per service person per year or the estimated GHG emissions of approximately 14.4 MT of CO2e per service person per year from the original project. Therefore, the modified project would not result in a potentially significant increase in GHG emissions.

In addition, the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) suggests making significance determinations on a case-by-case basis when no significance threshold has been formally adopted by a lead agency. This includes evaluating a project’s sources of GHG emissions and considering project consistency with applicable emission reduction strategies and goals. The modified project would be consistent with the policies identified in the City’s 2030 General Plan for addressing energy issues of climate change mitigation and adaptation, sea level rise, and energy conservation and generation by incorporating implementing features consistent with the latest requirements of the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. Additionally, the modified project’s post-2020 GHG emissions trajectory is expected to follow a declining trend under anticipated future regulatory restrictions, consistent with the State’s 2030 and 2050 and the goals of AB 32. The modified project would incorporate energy reduction and water conservation measures, identified in the City’s 2030 General Plan, that reduce GHG emissions compared to a conventional project of similar size and scope. Additionally, GHG emissions reductions would be achieved through energyefficient lighting, installation of low-flow appliances, and water conservation. Therefore, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts associated with GHG emissions and conflicts with any applicable GHG reduction plan, policy, or regulation, when compared to those under development anticipated for the project site in the 2004 MND. The 2004 493
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
28 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts associated with GHG emissions and none are required for the modified project. 494
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Cultural Resources
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 29
Cultural Resources
Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would the modified project cause a
substantial adverse change in the
significance of an historical
resource as defined in CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.5?
Discussion 1-
4, Section E.

Cultural
Resources
No No No

2. Would the modified project cause a
substantial adverse change in the
significance of a unique
archaeological resource pursuant
to State CEQA Guidelines Section
15064.5?
Discussion 1-
4, Section E.

Cultural
Resources
No No No

3. Would the modified project directly
or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or
unique geologic feature?
Discussion 1-
4, Section E.

Cultural
Resources
No No No

4. Would the modified project disturb
any human remains, including
those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
Discussion 1-
4, Section E.

Cultural
Resources
No No No
Discussion
The lots comprising the modified project site are currently undeveloped and located in an urban area of the City of Oxnard. According to the 2004 MND, the modified project site is disturbed from previous agricultural activity and no known cultural or historic resources are present on the site. 1-4) Conditions related to historic buildings and structures on the modified project site have not changed since the analysis of the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project in the 2004 MND because no new historic structures or building have been identified. As determined in the 2004 MND, development of the modified project site could result in adverse effects to previously unidentified archaeological or ethnographic resources because such resources have potential to be encountered. The modified project would not result in additional site disturbance beyond what was evaluated for Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project in the 2004 MND. Nevertheless, the modified project would be required, as applicable, to comply with Mitigation Measures E-1 and E-2 in the 2004 MND, requiring a Phase I cultural resources survey as well as Native American monitoring for subsurface grading, trenching, or construction activities to avoid impacts to cultural resources. As with the original project, implementation of these measures would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. The modified project would not result in any new or substantially more severe impacts to cultural resources than what was evaluated in the 2004 MND, nor would it require new mitigation measures.
495
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
30 This page intentionally left blank.
496
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Energy
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 31
Energy
Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would the Modified Project involve
wasteful, inefficient, or
unnecessary consumption of
energy during project construction,
operation, maintenance, and/or
removal?
N/A; New
CEQA
checklist
item added
subsequent
to 2004
MND
No No No

2. Would the Modified Project require
additional energy facilities, the
provision of which may have a
significant effect on the
environment?
N/A; New
CEQA
checklist
item added
subsequent
to 2004
MND
No No No

3. Would the Modified Project be
inconsistent with existing energy
standards?
N/A; New
CEQA
checklist
item added
subsequent
to 2004
MND
No No No

4. Would the Modified Project
preempt future energy
development or future energy
conservation, or inhibit the future
use of renewable energy or energy
storage?
N/A; New
CEQA
checklist
item added
subsequent
to 2004
MND
No No No
Discussion
Currently, there are no uses on the project site that require energy. The analysis in the 2004 MND predates updates to the State CEQA Guidelines requiring the evaluation of potential impacts related to energy consumption and resources and, therefore, did not address such impacts. Additional analysis is included below to determine the level of potential energy-related impacts and in comparison to the analysis in the 2004 MND for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project. 1-4) The California Energy Code provides energy conservation standards for all new commercial buildings constructed in California. The California Energy Code applies to the building envelope, space-conditioning systems, and water-heating and lighting systems of buildings and appliances.

The California Energy Code provides guidance on construction techniques to maximize energy conservation and minimum efficiency standards for a variety of building elements, including appliances, heating and cooling equipment, and insulation for doors, pipes, walls and ceilings. 497
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
32 As with the development of commercial uses under the original Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project, the proposed condominium units would involve the use of energy during construction and operation. Energy use during the construction phase would be primarily in the form of fuel consumption to operate heavy equipment, light-duty vehicles, machinery, and generators for lighting. Temporary grid power may also be provided to construction trailers or electric construction equipment. Long-term operation of the project would require permanent grid connections for electricity and natural gas service to power internal and exterior building lighting, and heating and cooling systems.

While operation of the modified project would result in the consumption of natural gas, increasingly efficient building features and automobile engines are expected to offset the project’s energy demand. The modified project would also be subject to energy conservation requirements in the California Energy Code (Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations, California’s Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings) and the California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen; Title 24, Part 11 of the California Code of Regulations). Adherence to Title 24 requirements would ensure that the modified project is consistent with current energy standards and would not result in wasteful and inefficient use of non-renewable resources due to building operation. Therefore, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe potential impacts related to energy demand and use compared to development of the original project. No mitigation was required in the 2004 MND and none would be required for the modified project.
498
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Geology and Soils
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 33
Geology and Soils
Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would the modified project expose
people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
a. Rupture of a known
earthquake fault, as delineated
on the most recent AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State
Geologist or based on other
substantial evidence of a
known fault?
Discussion 1-
4, Section F.

Geology and
Soils
No No No
b. Strong seismic groundshaking
that cannot be addressed
through compliance with
standard Code requirements?
Discussion 1-
4, Section F.

Geology and
Soils
No No No

2. Would the modified project be
located on a geologic unit or soil
that is unstable or that would
become unstable as a result of the
project and potentially result in an
on-site or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction,
or collapse that cannot be
addressed through compliance with
standard Code requirements?
Discussion 1-
4, Section F.

Geology and
Soils
No No No

3. Would the modified project be
located on expansive soil, creating
substantial risks to life or property
that cannot be addressed through
compliance with standard Code
requirements?
Discussion 1-
4, Section F.

Geology and
Soils
No No No

4. Would the modified project expose
people or structures to inundation
by seiche or tsunami?
Discussion 1-
4, Section F.

Geology and
Soils
No No No

5. Would the modified project rely on
dredging or other maintenance
activity by another agency that is
not guaranteed to continue?
Discussion 1-
4, Section F.

Geology and
Soils
No No No
499
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
34 Discussion
Oxnard is in an area that has a high potential for seismic ground shaking. While there are no known active faults within the City limits, active and potentially active faults are present in the surrounding region and may extend into the subsurface beneath the City. In addition, the City of Oxnard 2030 General Plan Background Report identifies the project site as being located in an area marked by high potential for seismic ground shaking and moderate to low potential for liquefaction. The proposed project is not located near the coastline, creeks, or drainage courses. Therefore, the area is not prone to inundation by seiche or tsunami.
1-5) Geological conditions on the modified project site have not substantially changed since the analysis of the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project in the 2004 MND. The condominium units proposed as part of the modified project would be in the same location as the development evaluated in the 2004 MND. Accordingly, the proposed development would be subject to the conditions of Mitigation Measure F-1 from the 2004 MND requiring a site-specific soils investigation by a licensed geotechnical engineer and incorporation of construction techniques or other measures identified from the geotechnical evaluation to prevent significant liquefaction/ compressible soils impacts. These measures would minimize and/or avoid risks to life and property associated with geologic and soil hazards. The modified project would not rely on dredging or other maintenance activity by another agency that is not guaranteed to continue. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure F-1 from the 2004 MND, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts relative to geological and soils conditions. No additional mitigation measures would be required.
500
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 35
Hazards and
Hazardous Materials Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would the modified project create
a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through the
routine transport, use, or disposal
of hazardous materials?
Discussion 1-
4, Section G.

Hazards and
Hazardous
Materials
No No No

2. Would the modified project create
a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset or
accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into
the environment?
Discussion 1-
4, Section G.

Hazards and
Hazardous
Materials
No No No

3. Would the modified project emit
hazardous substances or involve
handling hazardous or acutely
hazardous substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an
existing or proposed school in
quantities or a manner that would
create a substantial hazard?
Discussion 1-
4, Section G.

Hazards and
Hazardous
Materials
No No No

4. Would the modified project be
located on a site that is included on
a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government
Code Section 65962.5 and, as a
result, would it create a substantial
hazard to the public or
environment?
Discussion 1-
4, Section G.

Hazards and
Hazardous
Materials
No No No

5. Would the modified project impair
implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
Discussion 7,
Section G.

Hazards and
Hazardous
Materials
No No No
Discussion
The modified project site is currently vacant, but surrounded by various industrial, commercial, school and residential uses. The evaluation of the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project in the 2004 MND determined that development on the project site would not result in impacts or would have less than significant impacts related to hazardous materials emissions and handling, and emergency response.
501
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
36 1-4) Rincon Consultants, Inc. performed a Soil Vapor Assessment for the modified project in August 2020 to assess the potential groundwater contamination and identify potential adverse effects from a nearby, former aerospace facility (“Pneumo Abex” or “Abex” facility). A groundwater contamination plume was identified under the modified project site as a result of industrial activities conducted at the Abex facility located approximately 270 feet away from 5th Street and Portofino Place (project site). Facility operations and chemical handling and disposal practices at Abex resulted in contamination of local groundwater with trichloroethene (TCE) and other chlorinated volatile organic compounds (CVOCs). The VOC plume follows the groundwater flow direction southwest from the Abex site and extends under Juan Lagunas Soria School, which is located adjacent to the eastern boundary of the modified project site. Soil remediation at the Abex site began in 1995 and groundwater remediation, which is ongoing, began in 1999.

In 2008, a Soil Vapor Supplemental Site Investigation was conducted at the adjacent school. TCE was not detected in any soil vapor samples, including those from a soil vapor probe at the property line of the school and the project site. All other CVOCs were either below the California Human Health Screen Levels or not detected. The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) reviewed the 2008 investigation results and issued a no further action letter for the school in 2008. One groundwater sample was collected from the modified project site in 2018 and the TCE level was generally lower than samples collected at the school in 2008. Isoconcentration maps estimating total CVOCs in groundwater were presented in the most recent groundwater monitoring report for the school and show the groundwater CVOC plume extends through the modified project site.

Estimates of total CVOCs concentrations based on these maps indicate CVOC levels within acceptable concentrations at the adjacent school.

Sespe Consulting, Inc. conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the modified project site in May 2020. This ESA included a review of previous groundwater monitoring well data from previous years and concluded that soil vapor testing was not likely to identify substantial concentrations of CVOCs in soil vapor. The highest groundwater plume concentrations of CVOCs have remained near the point of release at the Abex facility location and are not expected to migrate substantially. Based on the findings of investigations and review of data for the area, the Soil Vapor Assessment concludes that that CVOCs in soil vapor at the modified project site are unlikely to pose a risk to human health of construction workers or future occupants.

The proposed residential condominium development would not introduce any new or unique hazards or hazardous materials to the modified project site beyond that associated with commercial development of the site under the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project in the 2004 MND. The modified project would not emit any known hazardous materials during or after construction.

The Oxnard Fire Department responds to hazardous materials incidents in the City. To minimize hazards and assist the business operators and the Fire Department in responding to emergencies involving hazardous materials, the City’s Certified Unified Permitting Agency (CUPA) requires compliance with the City’s hazardous materials regulations. With implementation of uniformly applied development policies that require oversight for on-site hazardous materials as well as compliance with all state and federal regulations governing the use, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts related to hazards or hazardous materials. The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts associated with hazardous materials and none are required for the modified project.
502
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 37
5) As with the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project evaluated in the 2004 MND, the modified project would be designed to meet City engineering standards and City Fire Department standards to ensure fire apparatus can reach all parts of the site and no issues with emergency access would occur. A Fire Access Plan has been prepared for the modified project, which shows the turning templates around interior private roadways to meet the City of Oxnard turning requirements for roadway intersections. The entries off of Portofino Place provide for a 26-foot roadway access with 20-foot drive aisles entering the project site, passing through the entry gates, and exiting the project to meet the requirements of gated two-way traffic entries. The two emergency access gates and entries on 5th Street would be 26-foot standard road width entries. Continued application of standard safety requirements and ongoing City programs would maintain safe conditions and access to and from the modified project site. Therefore, the modified project would not result in new or substantial more severe impacts related to emergency access when compared to what was analyzed in the 2004 MND. Mitigation was not identified in the 2004 MND and the modified project would not require mitigation.
503
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
38 This page intentionally left blank.
504
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Hydrology and Water Quality
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 39
Hydrology and Water
Quality Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would the modified project cause a
violation of any adopted water
quality standards or waste
discharge requirements?
Discussion 1-
3,5,6,
Section H.

Hydrology
and Water
Quality
No No No

2. Would the modified project
substantially deplete groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially
with groundwater recharge such
that there would be a net deficit in
aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level (e.g.,
the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level
that would not support existing
land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been granted)?
Discussion 1-
3,5,6,
Section H.

Hydrology
and Water
Quality
No No No

3. Would the modified project
substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or river, in a
manner that would result in on- or
off-site flooding or exceed the
capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems?
Discussion 1-
3,5,6,
Section H.

Hydrology
and Water
Quality
No No No

4. Would the modified project place
new structures within a 100-­­year
flood hazard area as mapped on a
federal Flood Hazard Boundary or
Flood Insurance Rate Map or other
flood hazard delineation map?
Discussion 7-
10, Section
H. Hydrology
and Water
Quality
No No No

5. Would the modified project impede
or redirect flood flows such that it
would increase on- or off-site flood
potential?
Discussion 7-
10, Section
H. Hydrology
and Water
Quality
No No No
505
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
40 Hydrology and Water
Quality Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

6. Would the modified project expose
people or structures to a significant
risk of loss, injury or death
involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of
a levee or dam?
Discussion 7-
10, Section
H. Hydrology
and Water
Quality
No No No

7. Would the modified project be
exposed to a substantial risk
related to inundation by seiche,
tsunami, or mudflow?
Discussion 7-
10, Section
H. Hydrology
and Water
Quality
No No No
Discussion
The lots comprising the modified project site are currently undeveloped and located in an urban area of the City of Oxnard. The modified project site is located outside of the 100-year flood plain, and is not located near the coastline, creeks, or drainage courses. 1-3) Hydrological conditions in the modified project site vicinity have not substantially changed since the analysis of the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project in the 2004 MND. The modified project does not involve any changes that would result in additional site disturbance beyond what was evaluated for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project in the 2004 MND. Water quality impacts associated with the modified project would primarily be those associated with motor vehicles and landscape maintenance. The primary source of non-point contaminants would be oil, grease, and particulates emitted by motor vehicles. As applicable, development of the proposed residential development would be required to comply with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board as well as the Ventura Countywide Stormwater Quality Urban Impact Mitigation Plan (SQUIMP) to reduce potential development impacts to water quality. Furthermore, compliance with existing local, state, and federal regulations for the use of hazardous materials would minimize potential impacts to water quality as a result of the project.

A Drainage Report, Storm Drainage Study, Detention Pond Sizing and Water Quality Design report (Drainage Report) was prepared by Peabody Engineering in July 2021 for the modified project.

According to the Drainage Report, there are two existing drainage stubs to the project at Riviera Court and Portofino Place that would be used to collect the drainage from the modified project along with a new drainage stub that would be installed in Portofino Place. The project also would have a piped drainage system in the private roadways that would collect drainage from curb and gutter drain inlets and convey the drainage to the four detention and two retention basins proposed on site. The proposed drainage features are designed to meet the hydrologic requirements of the City of Oxnard, peak flows requirements, and Ventura County standards for detention and water quality treatment. These features would also ensure that the project outflow does not exceed the existing capacity of the City drainage system that the project would be connected to. 506
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Hydrology and Water Quality
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 41
The modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts related to hydrology and water quality. The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts to hydrology and water quality, and none are required for the modified project. 4-7) The modified project site is located outside of the 100-year flood plain. Additionally, the project site is not located near the coastline, creeks, or drainage courses. Therefore, the modified project site not located in an area that is prone to risks associated with the 100-year floodplain or inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. As such, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts associated with risks of flooding or inundation and no mitigation is required. The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts associated with risks of flooding or inundation, and none are required for the modified project.
507
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
42 This page intentionally left blank.
508
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Land Use and Planning
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 43
Land Use and
Planning Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would the modified project conflict
with an applicable land use plan,
policy or regulation of the City or
other agency with jurisdiction over
the project adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating a
significant environmental effect?
Discussion 2,
Section I.

Land Use
and Planning
No No No

2. Would the modified project involve
land uses that are not allowed
under any applicable airport land
use compatibility plan?
Discussion 5-
6, Section G.

Hazards and
Hazardous
Materials
No No No

3. Would the modified project conflict
with an applicable habitat
conservation plan or natural
community conservation plan?
Discussion
1,3, Section
I. Land Use
and Planning
No No No

4. Would the modified project
physically divide an established
community?
Discussion
1,3, Section
I. Land Use
and Planning
No No No
Discussion
The lots included in the modified project have a General Plan land use designation and zoning of BRP and are undeveloped. The General Plan land use and zoning of BRP have not been subject to a General Plan Amendment or Zone Change since the analysis of the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project in the 2004 MND. The three lots included in the modified project lie within the traffic pattern zone of the Oxnard Airport, limiting the overall development density to a maximum of 25 percent structural coverage of the site.
1-4) The modified project requires a General Plan Amendment to change the existing land use designation from BRP to Low-Medium Residential (RLM), a Zone Change from BRP to Multi-Family Residential (R-2), a Tentative Tract Map to create 45 parcels and new roads, and a Special Use Permit to entitle the project. The proposed R-2 zoning would provide for an allowable density of one unit per 3,500 square-feet, or a total of 94 units on the project site (4 more than the 90 units proposed). The modified project does not include any proposed changes to the General Plan Land Use, Zoning or other modifications that that would result in development that would divide an established community or conflict with a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan.

As detailed in the 2004 MND, the modified project site is located in the Oxnard Airport Sphere of Influence, which limits the structural coverage to 25 percent. The proposed condominium development would not exceed the 25 percent allowable site coverage. Additionally, the modified 509
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
44 project would be required to implement Mitigation Measure G-2 from the 2004 MND to avoid conflicts with airport compatibility requirements by undergoing review by the Federal Aviation Administration. Mitigation Measure G-1, which stipulated buffer requirements for residential development upon the previously proposed widening of 5th Street, is no longer warranted because the City no longer has plans to widen 5
th Street. Additionally, the City’s adopted Capital
Improvement Plan (2021-2026) does not identify any proposals to widen 5 th Street or any segment
of road near the project vicinity. For these reasons, Mitigation Measure G-1 from the 2004 MND does not apply to the modified project. The modified project would also be required to comply with all zoning, land use, and development regulations applicable to the project site. With implementation of Mitigation Measure and G-2 from the 2004 MND and compliance with applicable regulations, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts associated with applicable land use, habitat conservation, or natural community conservation plans, or dividing an established community. No additional mitigation measures would be required for modified project.
510
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Mineral Resources
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 45
Mineral Resources
Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would the modified project result
in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource of value to the
region or state?
Discussion
1,2. Section
J. Mineral
Resources
No No No

2. Would the modified project result
in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource
recovery site delineated in the
2030 General Plan, specific plan or
other land use plan?
Discussion
1,2. Section
K. Mineral
Resources
No No No
Discussion
The City of Oxnard has mineral/sand/gravel deposits primarily along the Santa Clara River Channel, along the United State Highway 101 freeway corridor, and along the eastern edge of the City extending west of Oxnard Boulevard. The modified project site does not currently provide mineral resources of value to the region nor serve as a mineral resource recovery site. 1-2) As discussed in the 2004 MND, the modified project site is located in an area with soils designated as MRZ-1 and MRZ-4. Neither of these designations indicate the presence of prime mineral resources. Therefore, development of the project in the same location as the original 2004 commercial project would not result in a new or substantially more severe impacts to mineral resources. The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts to mineral resources, and none are required for the modified project. 511
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
46 This page intentionally left blank.
512
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Noise
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 47
Noise
Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would the modified project
generate or expose persons to
noise levels in excess of standards
established in the Oxnard 2030
General Plan or Noise Ordinance, or
applicable standards of other
agencies?
Discussion 1-
4,6, Section
K. Noise
No No No

2. Would the modified project
generate or expose persons to
excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
Discussion 1-
4,6, Section
K. Noise
No No No

3. Would the modified project
generate a substantial temporary
or periodic increase in ambient
noise in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project?
Discussion 1-
4,6, Section
K. Noise
No No No

4. Would the modified project
generate a substantial permanent
increase in ambient noise in the
project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
Discussion 1-
4,6, Section
K. Noise
No No No

5. For a project located within the
airport land use plan for Oxnard
Airport or within two miles of Naval
Base, Ventura County at Point
Mugu, would the modified project
expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive
noise levels?
Discussion 5,
Section K.

Noise
No No No

6. Would the modified project expose
non-human species to excessive
noise?
Discussion 1-
4,6, Section
K. Noise
No No No
Discussion
The modified project site is currently undeveloped and, thus, there are no current operations on the project site that produce noise in the project vicinity. The existing noise environment in the vicinity of the modified project site is characterized by urban noise sources including, commuter traffic, domestic noises, and office and light industrial operations. The 41 residential units included in the 2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project, adjacent to the southern boundary of the modified project site were completed in 2006 along with all required infrastructure. These units have not 513
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
48 resulted in substantial changes to noise environment on or surrounding the project site since the evaluation of the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project in the 2004 MND. 1-4) As with development of the project site under the 2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project, development on the modified project site could expose existing uses to temporary construction noise. It is anticipated that construction of the proposed condominium units would generate noise levels similar to those generated by construction of the previously evaluated commercial development. Additionally, development on the project site would be subject to City Code limitations on construction hours of operation in order to avoid disturbance of sensitive receptors.

New sources of long-term noise generated by the residences associated with the modified project would include traffic and domestic noise similar to that of existing development on and surrounding the project site. However, the proposed residences would generate less operational noise and traffic than commercial uses proposed for development on the project site under the 2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project.

The modified project would introduce a new noise-sensitive land use to the project site. However, the proposed condominium units would be set back from the major roadways in the vicinity of the project site, with intervening vegetation and landscaping reducing traffic noise experienced at the residences. The condominium units also would be required to be constructed to include sufficient noise attenuation to maintain interior noise levels to City standards for residential uses. This would typically require the use of such features as double-paned windows on all windows that are exposed to traffic noise, glazing area limitations, solid-core doors, and walls insulated in conformance with California Title 24 requirements. Therefore, the modified project would not result in a new or substantially more severe noise impact when compared to the development of the modified project site under the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project. No mitigation was required in the 2004 MND and none would be required for the modified project. 5) The modified project site is located approximately 550 feet south of the Oxnard Airport. The project site is located outside of the 65 dBA CNEL airport noise contour, but within the helicopter overflight area. Fly-over events are too infrequent to influence the 24-hour weighted CNEL noise contours, resulting in general project compatibility with City General Plan noise criteria. However, future on-site residents could be exposed to intermittent increases in noise levels that could result in temporary nuisance. As a result, the modified project would be subject to Mitigation Measure K-1 from the 2004 MND, which requires notification of future homeowners of the nearby airport operations and potential nuisances. With implementation of Mitigation Measure K-1, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts associated with airport noise and no additional mitigation measures would be required. 514
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Population, Education and Housing
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 49
Population, Education
and Housing Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would the modified project involve
a General Plan amendment that
could result in an increase in
population over that projected in
the 2030 General Plan that may
result in one or more significant
physical environmental effects?
Discussion 1-
3, Section L.

Population
and Housing
No No No

2. Would the modified project induce
substantial growth on the project
site or surrounding area, resulting
in one or more significant physical
environmental effects?
Discussion 1-
3, Section L.

Population
and Housing
No No No

3. Would the modified project result
in a substantial (15 single-family or
25 multi-family dwelling units –
about one-half block) net loss of
housing units through demolition,
conversion, or other means that
may necessitate the development
of replacement housing?
Discussion 1-
3, Section L.

Population
and Housing
No No No

4. Would the modified project result
in a net loss of existing housing
units affordable to very low- or
low-income households (as defined
by federal and/or City standards),
through demolition, conversion, or
other means that may necessitate
the development of replacement
housing?
Discussion 1-
3, Section L.

Population
and Housing
No No No

5. Would the modified project cause
an increase in enrollment at local
public schools that would exceed
capacity and necessitate the
construction of new or expanded
facilities?
Discussion 3,
Section M.

Public
Services
No No No

6. Would the modified project directly
or indirect interfere with the
operation of an existing or planned
school?
Discussion 3,
Section M.

Public
Services
No No No
515
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
50 Discussion
The modified project site is currently undeveloped and, thus, no uses exist on the project site that affect housing, population, or education in the project vicinity. 1-2) The modified project involves the development of residential condominium units in place of the commercial development evaluated as part of the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project. Based on the DOF 2021 population and housing estimates, the City had a total population of 204,675 people and an average household size of 3.86 persons in January 2021. Using the average household size, the 90 proposed residential units included in the project would accommodate approximately 348 people. This would result in a total population of 205,023 people in the City upon project implementation. SCAG’s 2016–2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy growth forecast projects a population of 237,300 people in the City in 2040. The total population in the City with implementation of the modified project would not exceed SCAG’s most recent growth projections for the City. Therefore, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts than the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project from population growth. The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts related to population growth, and no such measures are required for the modified project. 3-4) The modified project would result in the development of 90 residential units in place of the commercial development evaluated as part of the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project. The modified project would add to the City’s housing stock, and extend existing residential development in the project area. Therefore, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts than the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project related to a substantial loss of housing. No mitigation was required in the 2004 MND and none would be required for the modified project.
5-6) The 2004 MND for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project noted that development on the project site would be served by the Oxnard Elementary School District and Oxnard Union High School District, and development on the site would be required to pay school fees to offset impacts to schools in the district. While the proposed condominium units would increase the population in the City and, therefore, increase demand on public schools, the applicant would be required to pay applicable school impact fees. Section 65995(h) of the California Government Code (Senate Bill 50, chaptered August 27, 1998) states that payment of statutory fees “...is deemed to be full and complete mitigation of the impacts of any legislative or adjudicative act, or both, involving, but not limited to, the planning, use, or development of real property, or any change in governmental organization or reorganization.” Therefore, with the payment of school impact fees, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts to schools beyond what was identified in the 2004 MND. No additional mitigation is required. 516
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Public Services and Recreation
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 51
Public Services and
Recreation Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would the modified project
increase demand for fire protection
service such that new or expanded
facilities would be needed to
maintain acceptable service levels,
the construction of which may have
significant environmental effects?
Discussion 1,
Section M.

Public
Services
No No No

2. Would the modified project
increase demand for law
enforcement service such that new
or expanded facilities would be
needed to maintain acceptable
service levels, the construction of
which may have significant
environmental effects?
Discussion 2,
Section M.

Public
Services
No No No

3. Would the modified project
increase the use of existing park
facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the
facilities would occur or be
accelerated or that new or
expanded park facilities would be
needed to maintain acceptable
service levels?
Discussion 4,
Section M.

Public
Services
Discussion 1-
2, Section N.

Recreation
No No No

4. Would the modified project
increase the need for or use of
existing library or other community
facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the
facilities would occur or be
accelerated?
Discussion 5,
Section M.

Public
Services
No No No
Discussion
The modified project site is currently undeveloped and, thus, no uses exist on the project site that affect public services and recreation in the area.
1) The modified project site is under the jurisdiction of the Oxnard Fire Department (OFD). The OFD fire station nearest to the modified project site is Station 1, located approximately 1.25 mile east of the site at 491 South K Street. Due to development limitations on the development density of residential uses on the modified project site as a result of the nearby Oxnard Airport, the modified project would not result in major increases in demand for OFD services when compared to the commercial development of the site under the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project. The 517
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
52 change in demand would not be substantially different than that required for development under the original project nor would it affect the provision of fire protection given the location of the modified project site in an urbanized area of the City and within the current OFD service area. The proposed condominium development would also be required to meet all fire and building code provisions to the satisfaction of the OFD. The change in demand for OFD services would not result in the need for new or expanded facilities to maintain acceptable service levels, the construction of which may have significant environmental effects. Therefore, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts to fire protection services or facilities beyond what was identified in the 2004 MND. The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts to fire protection facilities and services, and no such measures are required for the modified project.
2) The modified project site is under the jurisdiction of the Oxnard Police Department (OPD) for law enforcement protection services. OPD operates from its police station located at 251 South C Street, approximately 1.8 miles northeast of the project site. The City is divided into four police districts, each of which is further divided into smaller response beats. The modified project site is located in Beat 21, which is part of the West District.

Due to development limitations on the development density of residential uses on the modified project site as a result of the nearby Oxnard Airport, the modified project would not result in major increases in demand for OPD services when compared to the commercial development of the site under the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project. The change in demand would not be substantially different than that required for commercial development under the original project nor would it affect the provision of police protection given the location of the modified project site in an urbanized area of the City that is within the current OPD service area. Additionally, the residential condominium development would incorporate various security features, such as fencing, and street lighting, to minimize trespassing and other crime that could place an additional demand on OPD. The change in demand for OPD services would not result in the need for new or expanded facilities to maintain acceptable service levels, the construction of which may have significant environmental effects. Therefore, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts to police protection services or facilities beyond what was identified in the 2004 MND. The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts to police protection facilities and services, and no such measures are required for the modified project. 3-4) According to Section 4.5.1 of the Background Report for the 2030 General Plan, the City of Oxnard operates 50 existing park facilities located in the City Planning Area. In total, the City Planning Area contains approximately 828 acres of parkland, including a 362-acre public golf course.

The nearest parks to the project site include Dunkirk Park, approximately 950 feet to the east of the site, and Seaview Park, approximately 900 feet to south of the site. The modified project does not involve any additional public recreational uses or permanent alterations of existing recreational or library facilities. The project would provide a 3,281 square-foot recreation building, pool, playground, and open space for use by residents of the new condominium units. The proposed condominium units would increase the population in the City, which may increase demand on nearby parks as well as City library facilities when compared to the commercial development of the site under the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project. In accordance with the City’s 2030 General Plan, the project applicant would be required to pay applicable developer fees to finance public facilities needed to offset any additional demand on parks and recreational facilities and library facilities. These developer fees would be assessed and determined by the City’s Community Development Department through the plan check and permitting process prior to the issuance of 518
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Public Services and Recreation
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 53
building permits. As such, the modified project would not result in an increased use of recreational or library facilities that would induce physical deterioration or require construction with a potential adverse effect on the environment when compared to what was analyzed in the 2004 MND.

Therefore, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts to parks or recreational facilities, or library facilities. No mitigation was required in the 2004 MND and none would be required for the modified project.
519
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
54 This page intentionally left blank.
520
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Transportation and Circulation
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 55
Transportation
and Circulation
Where Impact Was
Analyzed in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation of
a Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would the modified
project cause an increase
in traffic that is substantial
in relation to the existing
traffic load and capacity of
the street system (i.e.,
result in a substantial
increase in either the
number of vehicle trips,
the volume to capacity
ratio on roads, or
congestion at
intersections) based on
adopted City of Oxnard
level of service (LOS)
standards?
Discussion 1-3,
Section O.

Transportation/Traffic
No No No

2. Would the modified
project exceed, either
individually or
cumulatively, and LOS
standard established by
the Ventura County
Congestion Management
Program (CMP) for
designated roads or
highways?
Discussion 1-3,
Section O.

Transportation/Traffic
No No No

3. Would the modified
project result in a change
in air traffic patterns,
including either an
increase in traffic levels or
a change in location that
results in substantial safety
risks?
Discussion 1-3,
Section O.

Transportation/Traffic
No No No

4. Would the modified
project substantially
increase hazards due to a
design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous
intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g.,
farm equipment)?
Discussion 4-5,
Section O.

Transportation/Traffic
No No No
521
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
56 Transportation
and Circulation
Where Impact Was
Analyzed in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation of
a Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

5. Would the modified
project result in
inadequate emergency
access?
Discussion 4-5,
Section O.

Transportation/Traffic
No No No

6. Would the modified
project conflict with
adopted policies, plans, or
programs supporting
alternative transportation
(e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle
racks)?
Discussion 7, Section
O.

Transportation/Traffic
No No No
Discussion
The project site does not currently contain any uses or operations affecting the transportation and circulation system in the area.
1-2) According to the 2004 MND, development facilitated by the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project would not result in deficiencies in the local circulation system. The evaluation in the 2004 MND determined that the development of residential development included in the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project would result in a net increase in 456 trips per day. The evaluation in the 2004 MDN did not evaluate an increase in vehicle trips as a result of the development of commercial uses on the modified project site.

Since adoption of the 2004 MND the CEQA statute and guidelines have been revised to require evaluation of impacts on the local transportation and circulation system on the basis of VMT.

Accordingly, the project’s proposed change in land use within a portion of the 2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project site is analyzed further below, incorporating the VMT estimates for the proposed project to determine the level of impacts to transportation and circulation in comparison the development of the modified project site under the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project.

Per SB 743, the State CEQA Guidelines have been updated to incorporate vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the primary metric for analyzing transportation impacts under CEQA. This update occurred after preparation of the 2004 MND so VMT is not specifically addressed in the prior analysis.

However, because the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) has imposed a July 1, 2020 deadline for lead agencies to switch to use of the VMT metric, consideration of VMT is appropriate. The July 1, 2020 switch furthers the State’s commitment to the goals of SB 375, AB 32, and AB 1358. Senate Bill 743 adds Chapter 2.7, Modernization of Transportation Analysis for Transit-Oriented Infill Projects, to Division 13 (Section 21099) of the Public Resources Code. Key provisions of SB 743 include reforming CEQA analysis for aesthetics and parking for urban infill projects and replacing the measurement of automobile delay with VMT as a metric that can be used for measuring environmental impacts. Under SB 743, the focus of the environmental impacts of transportation shift from driver delay to reduction of GHG emissions, creation of multimodal networks, and 522
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Transportation and Circulation
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 57
promotion of a mix of land uses, and LOS standards become local policy thresholds as adopted among individual agencies.

The City of Oxnard has not adopted any specific significance thresholds related to VMT. OPR’s Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (December 2018) provides guidance on analyzing VMT impacts in light of SB 743. According to the Technical Advisory, a 15 percent lower per capita VMT than existing development is both generally achievable and is supported by evidence that connects this level of reduction to the state’s emissions goals. As a result, this 15 percent per capita reduction target is recommended in the Technical Advisory as the threshold for VMT impacts. If the per capita VMT for a project would not be reduced compared to the City’s VMT per capita by a factor of 15 percent, then VMT impacts would be considered significant. Furthermore, for a project that replaces existing VMT-generating land uses, the Technical Advisory states that the project would lead to a less-than-significant transportation impact if the replacement land use leads to a net overall decrease in VMT.

The total VMT associated with commercial development under the original project as well as the residential development under the modified project was estimated using CalEEMod. Based on the CalEEMod analysis (see Appendix B), the commercial development under the original project would result in annual VMT of 5,172,230. The modified project would result in annual VMT of 1,812,497, or an average daily VMT of 4,966 (annual VMT divided by 365 days per year). Therefore, the modified project would result in a net overall decrease in VMT than development of the project site under the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project, resulting in a less than significant transportation impact.

Based on the DOF 2020 average household size of 3.86 persons, the 90 proposed residential units included in the project would accommodate approximately 348 people. Accordingly, the modified project would result in 4,105 miles per person per year or about 11.2 miles per person per day. This suggests an average commute distance of 5.6 miles (11.2/2). By comparison, the Southern California Association of Governments’ 2016 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCAG’s RTP/SCS) estimates the 2040 average work trip length at 15.5 miles and non-work trip length at 7.9 miles. Conservatively using the non-trip work length, this suggests an average of 15.8 miles (7.9 x 2) per resident per day1. The 11.2 miles per resident per day for the project would be approximately 29 percent lower than this average, which exceeds the 15 percent reduction threshold that the OPR recommends for projects.

Based on the above, the project would generally reduce VMT on both a local and regional level by minimizing travel distances for new residents in the City. Although the 2004 MND does not address VMT, significant VMT impacts are not anticipated. Therefore, the current proposal would not create a new significant transportation impact related to VMT that is not identified in the 2004 MND. The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts related to increases in VMT, and no such measures are required for the modified project. 3-6) The modified project would be designed to meet City engineering standards and City Fire Department standards to ensure fire apparatus can reach all parts of the site, and no safety issues have been identified. Furthermore, development of the modified project would be required to comply with all applicable 2030 General Plan policies intended to calm traffic and enhance the 1 Typical trip rates for multi-family housing are approximately 6.6 trips/unit/day, which suggests between 2 to 4 work trips and the remainder as non-work trips. Considering this trip rate, the actual 2040 average trip length is likely even higher than the conservative estimate of 15.8 miles per resident per day, resulting in an even greater exceedance of the reduction threshold by the modified project than estimated.
523
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
58 walkability throughout the City. Implementation of these policies, in combination with continued application of standard safety requirements and ongoing City programs, would maintain safe conditions for pedestrians on the project site. Therefore, the modified project would not result in new or substantial increases in traffic hazards when compared to what was analyzed in the 2004 MND. The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts from traffic hazards, and none are required for the modified project. 7) The Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project in the 2004 MND included conditions to provide pedestrian connections to access to South Coast Area Transit stops along 5th Street as well as dedication of land area sufficient to provide bike lanes and sidewalks along 5th Street in the modified project site vicinity. The modified project would not change or impair implementation of these alternative transportation improvements, or otherwise conflict with any other policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. Therefore, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe conflict with plans, policies, or programs for such facilities than what was analyzed in the 2004 MND. No mitigation was required in the 2004 MND and none would be required for the modified project.
524
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Tribal Cultural Resources
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 59
Tribal Cultural
Resources Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?
Would the Modified Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in a Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, or cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:

1. Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code Section
5020.1(k)?
Discussion 1-
4, Section E.

Cultural
Resources
No No No

2. A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and
supported by substantial evidence,
to be significant pursuant to
criteria set forth in subdivision (c)
of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1,
the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe?
Discussion 1-
4, Section E.

Cultural
Resources
No No No
Discussion
Although not explicitly included in the adopted 2004 MND, a discussion of tribal cultural resources is included in this Addendum per the most recent version of the State CEQA Guidelines. Changes to the State CEQA Guidelines requiring analysis of tribal cultural resources took effect July 2015.

Because the project’s environmental review process was initiated prior to July 2015, analysis of impacts to tribal cultural resources is not required. The analysis below is included for informational purposes.

The lots comprising the modified project site are currently undeveloped and located in an urban area of the City of Oxnard. According to the 2004 MND, the modified project site is disturbed from previous agricultural activity and no known tribal cultural resources are present on the site.

According to the 2004 MND, development facilitated by the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project could result in adverse effects to previously unidentified archaeological or ethnographic resources because such resources have potential to be encountered in the City. The 2004 MND determined that impacts to these resources would be less than significant level with mitigation requiring Native American monitoring for subsurface grading, trenching, or construction activities. 1-2) As determined in the 2004 MND, development of the project site could result in adverse effects to previously unidentified archaeological or ethnographic resources because such resources have 525
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
60 potential to be encountered in the City. The modified project would not result in additional site disturbance beyond what was evaluated for Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project in the 2004 MND. Nevertheless, the modified project would be required, as applicable, to comply with Mitigation Measures E-1 and E-2 in the 2004 MND, requiring a Phase I cultural resources survey as well as Native American monitoring for subsurface grading, trenching, or construction activities to avoid impacts to cultural resources. As with the original project, implementation of these measures would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. The modified project would not result in any new or substantially more severe impacts to tribal cultural resources than what was evaluated in the 2004 MND, nor would it require new mitigation measures. 526
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Utilities
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 61
Utilities
Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would the modified project need
new or expanded water supply
entitlements that are not
anticipated in the current Urban
Water Management Plan?
Discussion 1-
5, Section P.

Utilities and
Service
Systems
No No No

2. Would additional wastewater
conveyance or treatment capacity
be required to serve the modified
project demand and existing
commitments?
Discussion 1-
5, Section P.

Utilities and
Service
Systems
No No No

3. Would the modified project
generate solid waste that would
exceed the permitted capacity of a
landfill serving the City?
Discussion 6-
7, Section P.

Utilities and
Service
Systems
No No No

4. Would the modified project conflict
with federal, state, or local statutes
or regulations related to solid
waste?
Discussion 6-
7, Section P.

Utilities and
Service
Systems
No No No
Discussion
The lots comprising the modified project site are currently undeveloped and located in an urban area of the City of Oxnard. Currently, there are no uses on the project site that require utilities or energy.
1) The 2004 MND for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project determined that water would be supplied to development on the project site by Calleguas Municipal Water District (CMWD). The City’s current water supply consists of imported surface water from the CMWD, groundwater from the United Water Conservation District (UWCD), and local groundwater from City wells.

As with the commercial development evaluated as part of the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project, the proposed Portofino Place Project applicant will be required to obtain a “will serve” letter from the City of Oxnard Water Division to ensure that the Water Division has adequate water to serve the development. The modified project would also be subject to standard City conditions requiring all projects to provide drought-tolerant landscaping to reduce the amount of water consumed by the project. Therefore, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts to water resources or facilities than the project analyzed in the 2004 MND. The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts to water resources or facilities, and no such measures are required for the modified project. 527
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
62 2) The 2004 MND for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project determined that commercial development of the modified project site would not result in impacts to wastewater facilities and services. The proposed residential condominium development on the modified project site would connect to the existing sewer system. The modified project would be required to comply with applicable County and City wastewater discharge limitations and requirements. Additionally, the applicant would be required to pay the City-required Sewer Connection Fees (SCF) and service charges that finance the operation and maintenance of the sewer system in the City. With payment of these fees and compliance with local wastewater regulations, the modified project would not result in new of substantially more severe impacts related to wastewater conveyance or facilities.

The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts to wastewater conveyance or facilities, and none are required for the modified project. 3-4) As with the previously approved Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project, the modified project would be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring compliance with the City’s recycling programs, which require solid waste recycling and disposal plans and reporting during construction and operation of the facility. With these provisions, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts related to solid waste generation and disposal than the project analyzed in the 2004 MND. No mitigation was required in the 2004 MND and none would be required for the modified project.
528
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Wildfire
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 63
Wildfire
Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Modified Project:

1. Substantially impair an adopted
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
Discussion 7,
Section G.

Hazards and
Hazardous
Materials
No No No

2. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and
other factors, exacerbate wildfire
risks and thereby expose project
occupants to pollutant
concentrations from a wildfire or
the uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?
N/A; New
CEQA
checklist
item added
subsequent
to 2004
MND
No No No

3. Require the installation or
maintenance of associated
infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources,
power lines or other utilities) that
may exacerbate fire risk or that
may result in temporary or ongoing
impacts to the environment?
N/A; New
CEQA
checklist
item added
subsequent
to 2004
MND
No No No

4. Expose people or structures to
significant risks, including
downslopes or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of
runoff, post-fire slope instability, or
drainage changes?
N/A; New
CEQA
checklist
item added
subsequent
to 2004
MND
No No No
Discussion
The lots comprising the modified project site are currently undeveloped and located in an urban area of the City of Oxnard. The City and project site are not located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones (California Department of Technology 2020).

The analysis in the 2004 MND predates updates to the State CEQA Guidelines requiring the evaluation of potential impacts related to wildfire and, therefore, did not address such impacts.

Additional analysis is included below to determine the level of potential wildfire-related impacts for the modified project and in comparison to the analysis in the 2004 MND for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract 5640 Project.
529
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
64 1-4) The modified project would occur in the same location as development under the 2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract 5640 Project, which is not located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. Additionally, the modified project would be required to implement all uniformly applied development standards to ensure emergency access to the site and avoid conflict with City emergency response and evacuation plans. Due to the location of the project site in a developed portion of the City away from state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones and required compliance with emergency standards and plans, the project would not exacerbate wildfire risks or otherwise expose people or structures to significant risks associated with wildfire or post-fire conditions. Therefore, the modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe potential impacts related to wildfire compared to development of previously approved retail uses. The 2004 MND does not include any mitigation measures for potential impacts related to wildfire risks or emergency plans, and no such measures are required for the Modified Project.
530
City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist Issue Topics Cumulative Impacts
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 65
Cumulative Impacts
Where Impact
Was Analyzed
in the 2004
MND
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do Any New
Circumstances
Involve New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Is Preparation
of a
Supplemental
or Subsequent
MND Required?

1. Would cumulative impact of the
modified project in combination
with the impacts of past, present,
and reasonably foreseeable future
projects exceed a City significance
threshold?
Sections A.
through Q.
of 2004
MND
No No No

2. If so, would the modified project’s
contribution to the significant
cumulative impact be cumulatively
considerable?
Sections A.
through Q.
of 2004
MND
No No No
Discussion
The modified project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts compared to the previously approved project with implementation of mitigation measures discussed herein. The modified project is an urban infill project in an area planned for development under the 2030 General Plan and in the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project. Cumulative citywide significant impacts were documented in the 2030 General Plan Program EIR and overriding considerations were adopted in 2011. Furthermore, the total population in the City with implementation of the modified project would be well within SCAG’s most recent growth projections and forecasts for the City. The modified project would not contribute to any cumulative impacts nor require additional mitigation beyond that considered in the General Plan EIR. 531
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
66 This page intentionally left blank.
532
Determination
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 67

6. Determination
In accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Oxnard has determined that this Addendum to the 2004 MND for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project is adequate to document changes or additions that have occurred in the project description since the 2004 MND was originally prepared. No new or more severe significant environmental impacts beyond those disclosed in the 2004 MND would occur as a result of the proposed Portofino Place Project and no additional mitigation would be required. The City has reviewed and considered the information contained in this Addendum in its consideration of the 2004 MND and finds that preparation of a subsequent negative declaration is not necessary.
533
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
68 This page left intentionally blank.
534
References
Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project 69
References
Please refer to the Additional References section in the 2004 MND for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project, in addition to the reference listed below.

California Air Resources Board (CARB). November 2017. California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. Available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/ab-32-climate-changescoping-plan California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). November 2019. 2018 California Public Road Data, Statistical Information Derived from the Highway Performance Monitoring System.

Available at: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/research-innovation-systeminformation/highway-performance-monitoring-system Oxnard, City of. February 18, 2020. Oxnard, California Codified Ordinances, Chapter 16: Zoning Code. Available at: https://www.oxnard.org/city-department/communitydevelopment/planning/planning-and-zoning-search/ Oxnard, City of. October 2011. 2030 General Plan – Goals and Policies. Available at:
https://www.oxnard.org/city-department/community-development/planning/2030- general-plan/
Oxnard, City of. 2030 General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH 2007041024).

Available at: https://www.oxnard.org/city-department/communitydevelopment/planning/2030-general-plan/ San Diego Association of Governments. May 13, 2008. Building Area Per Employee By Business Type.

Available at: https://bt-wpstatic.freetls.fastly.net/wpcontent/blogs.dir/2331/files/2016/11/Buildinga-Area-Per-Employee-by-Building-Type.pdf State of California, Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State — January 1, 2011-2021. Sacramento, California, May 2021.

Available at: http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Estimates/E-5/ 535
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
70 This page intentionally left blank.
536
Appendix A
Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2004 MND for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project
537
538
Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2004 MND for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
2004 Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project A-1
Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2004 MND
for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project
The mitigation measures identified in the 2004 MND for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project which are applicable to, and incorporated into, the project are listed in Table A-1 below for reference.

Table A-1 Mitigation Measures Identified in the 2004 MND for the Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project that are Applicable to the Project
Mitigation Measures
Air Quality
C-1 Developer shall ensure that all construction equipment is maintained and tuned to meet applicable Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and California Air Resources Board (CARB) emission requirements. At such times as new emission control devices or operational modifications are found to be effective, Developer shall immediately implement such devices or operational modifications on all construction equipment.

C-2 During smog season (May through October), developer shall lengthen the construction period so as to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating at the same time.

C-3 At all times during construction activities, Developer shall minimize the area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations to prevent excessive amounts of dust.

C-4 During construction, Developer shall water the area to be graded or excavated prior to commencement of grading or excavation operations. Such application of water shall be at least twice per day and shall penetrate sufficiently to minimize fugitive dust during grading activities.

C-5 During construction, Developer shall control dust by the following activities:
▪ All trucks hauling graded or excavated material offsite shall be required to cover their loads as required by California Vehicle Code §23114, with special attention to Sections 23114(b)(F), (e)(2) and (e)(4) as amended, regarding the prevention of such material spilling onto public streets and roads.
▪ All graded and excavated material, exposed soils areas, and active portions of the construction site, including unpaved onsite roadways, shall be treated to prevent fugitive dust. Treatment shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, periodic watering, application of environmentally-safe soil stabilization materials, and/or rollcompaction as appropriate. Watering shall be done as often as necessary and reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible.

C-6 During construction, Developer shall post and maintain onsite signs, in highly visible areas, restricting all vehicular traffic to 15 miles per hour or less.

C-7 During periods of high winds (i.e. wind speed sufficient to cause fugitive dust to impact adjacent properties), Developer shall cease all clearing, grading, earth moving, and excavation operations to prevent fugitive dust from being a nuisance or creating a hazard, either onsite or offsite.
539
City of Oxnard
Portofino Place Project
A-2
C-8 Throughout construction, Developer shall sweep adjacent streets and roads at least once per day, preferably at the end of the day, so that any visible soil material and debris from the construction site is removed from adjacent roadways.

Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources
E-1 Developer shall contract with a qualified archaeologist to conduct a Phase I cultural resources survey of the project site prior to issuance of any grading permits. The survey shall include: (1) an archaeological and historical records search through the California Historical Resources Information System at CalState Fullerton; and (2) a field inspection of the project site. Upon completion, the Phase I survey report shall be submitted to the Planning Division for compliance verification. A copy of the contract for these services shall be submitted to the Planning Division Manager for review and approval prior to initiation of the Phase I activities.

The contract shall include provisions in case any cultural resources are discovered onsite.

In the event that any historic or prehistoric cultural resources are discovered, work in the vicinity of the find shall be halted immediately. The archaeologist shall evaluate the discovery and determine the necessary mitigations for successful compliance with all applicable regulations. Developer or its successor in interest shall be responsible for paying all salaries, fees and the cost of any future mitigation resulting from the survey.

E-2 Developer shall contract with a Native American monitor to be present during all subsurface grading, trenching or construction activities on the project site. The monitor shall provide a monthly report to the Planning Division summarizing the activities during the reporting period. A copy of the contract for these services shall be submitted to the Planning Division Manager for review and approval prior to issuance of any grading permits. The monitoring report(s) shall be provided to the Planning Division prior to approval of final building permit signature.

Geology and Soils
F-1 Developer shall submit a site-specific soils investigation, which shall be prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer. At a minimum, such study shall include liquefaction and compressible soil characteristics on the subject site, and shall identify any necessary construction techniques or other mitigation measures to prevent significant liquefaction/compressible soils impacts upon the proposed project. all recommendations of said report shall be incorporated into the project. developer shall submit the report to the Building Official for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.

Land Use and Planning
G-2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall file a Form 7460, “Notice of Proposed Construction” with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and provide a copy to the Planning Division that enables the FAA to review the development for any hazard to airport/aviation operations.

Noise
K-1 The applicant shall provide a notice to potential homebuyers disclosing the presence of the Oxnard Airport and a helicopter flight path along West Fifth Street. The applicant shall provide such notice to each homebuyer and obtain signatures acknowledging the presence of the Oxnard Airport and helicopter flight path along West Fifth Street. 540
Appendix B
California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0) Output 541
Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project)
Ventura County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Lot acreage and square footage based on Project Description. Population based on 3.89 people per household (DOF 2020). Health Club land use represents proposed community building.

Construction Phase -
Vehicle Trips - Health Club land use represents proposed community building that would serve future residents and would not generate new trips.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Health Club 3.28 1000sqft 0.02 3,281.00 0
Condo/Townhouse 90.00 Dwelling Unit 7.58 130,205.00 350

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
8 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2023
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 3,280.00 3,281.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 90,000.00 130,205.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.08 0.02
tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.63 7.58
tblLandUse Population 275.00 350.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 542

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 64.10 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 19.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 16.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 39.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 9.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 52.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 20.87 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 26.73 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 32.93 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 543

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.2382 2.0822 2.1782 4.0200e0030.2339 0.1033 0.3373 0.1021 0.0969 0.1990 0.0000 351.9405 351.9405 0.0745 4.4200e003355.1208 2023 0.7079 0.2646 0.3511 6.1000e0048.2500e0030.0129 0.0211 2.2100e0030.0121 0.0143 0.0000 53.4060 53.4060 0.0124 4.5000e00453.8491 Maximum 0.7079 2.0822 2.1782 4.0200e0030.2339 0.1033 0.3373 0.1021 0.0969 0.1990 0.0000 351.9405 351.9405 0.0745 4.4200e003355.1208 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.2382 2.0822 2.1782 4.0200e0030.2339 0.1033 0.3373 0.1021 0.0969 0.1990 0.0000 351.9402 351.9402 0.0745 4.4200e003355.1205 2023 0.7079 0.2646 0.3511 6.1000e0048.2500e0030.0129 0.0211 2.2100e0030.0121 0.0143 0.0000 53.4059 53.4059 0.0124 4.5000e00453.8490 Maximum 0.7079 2.0822 2.1782 4.0200e0030.2339 0.1033 0.3373 0.1021 0.0969 0.1990 0.0000 351.9402 351.9402 0.0745 4.4200e003355.1205 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 544
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-1-2022 3-31-2022 0.5408 0.5408
2 4-1-2022 6-30-2022 0.5900 0.5900
3 7-1-2022 9-30-2022 0.5965 0.5965
4 10-1-2022 12-31-2022 0.5984 0.5984
5 1-1-2023 3-31-2023 0.9669 0.9669
Highest 0.9669 0.9669

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.6092 7.7100e0030.6684 4.0000e0053.7000e0033.7000e0033.7000e0033.7000e0030.0000 1.0917 1.0917 1.0500e0030.0000 1.1179 Energy 8.3800e0030.0718 0.0319 4.6000e0045.7900e0035.7900e0035.7900e0035.7900e0030.0000 164.8474 164.8474 8.5100e0032.3600e003165.7628 Mobile 0.3504 0.4282 3.2638 6.4800e0030.6826 5.2200e0030.6878 0.1823 4.8700e0030.1871 0.0000 597.8210 597.8210 0.0422 0.0291 607.5516 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 12.1998 0.0000 12.1998 0.7210 0.0000 30.2244 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.9219 21.5070 23.4288 0.1992 4.8800e00329.8636 Total 0.9680 0.5077 3.9642 6.9800e0030.6826 0.0147 0.6973 0.1823 0.0144 0.1966 14.1216 785.2670 799.3886 0.9720 0.0364 834.5203 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 545

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.6092 7.7100e0030.6684 4.0000e0053.7000e0033.7000e0033.7000e0033.7000e0030.0000 1.0917 1.0917 1.0500e0030.0000 1.1179 Energy 8.3800e0030.0718 0.0319 4.6000e0045.7900e0035.7900e0035.7900e0035.7900e0030.0000 164.8474 164.8474 8.5100e0032.3600e003165.7628 Mobile 0.3504 0.4282 3.2638 6.4800e0030.6826 5.2200e0030.6878 0.1823 4.8700e0030.1871 0.0000 597.8210 597.8210 0.0422 0.0291 607.5516 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 12.1998 0.0000 12.1998 0.7210 0.0000 30.2244 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.9219 21.5070 23.4288 0.1992 4.8800e00329.8636 Total 0.9680 0.5077 3.9642 6.9800e0030.6826 0.0147 0.6973 0.1823 0.0144 0.1966 14.1216 785.2670 799.3886 0.9720 0.0364 834.5203 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/29/2022 2/11/2022 5 10 2 Grading Grading 2/12/2022 3/11/2022 5 20
3 Building Construction Building Construction 3/12/2022 1/27/2023 5 230 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 546
4 Paving Paving 1/28/2023 2/24/2023 5 20
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/25/2023 3/24/2023 5 20 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Residential Indoor: 263,665; Residential Outdoor: 87,888; Non-Residential Indoor: 4,922; Non-Residential Outdoor: 1,641; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 547

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0983 0.0000 0.0983 0.0505 0.0000 0.0505 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e0048.0600e0038.0600e0037.4200e0037.4200e0030.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8549 Total 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e0040.0983 8.0600e0030.1064 0.0505 7.4200e0030.0579 0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8549 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 66.00 10.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 13.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 548

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e0042.0000e0042.4200e0031.0000e0057.3000e0040.0000 7.3000e0041.9000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.5758 0.5758 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.5816 Total 2.8000e0042.0000e0042.4200e0031.0000e0057.3000e0040.0000 7.3000e0041.9000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.5758 0.5758 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.5816 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0983 0.0000 0.0983 0.0505 0.0000 0.0505 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e0048.0600e0038.0600e0037.4200e0037.4200e0030.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8549 Total 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e0040.0983 8.0600e0030.1064 0.0505 7.4200e0030.0579 0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8549 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 549

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e0042.0000e0042.4200e0031.0000e0057.3000e0040.0000 7.3000e0041.9000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.5758 0.5758 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.5816 Total 2.8000e0042.0000e0042.4200e0031.0000e0057.3000e0040.0000 7.3000e0041.9000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.5758 0.5758 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.5816 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0708 0.0000 0.0708 0.0343 0.0000 0.0343 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e0049.4100e0039.4100e0038.6600e0038.6600e0030.0000 26.0548 26.0548 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2654 Total 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e0040.0708 9.4100e0030.0802 0.0343 8.6600e0030.0429 0.0000 26.0548 26.0548 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2654 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 550

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.6000e0043.4000e0044.0300e0031.0000e0051.2100e0031.0000e0051.2200e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 0.9596 0.9596 3.0000e0053.0000e0050.9693 Total 4.6000e0043.4000e0044.0300e0031.0000e0051.2100e0031.0000e0051.2200e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 0.9596 0.9596 3.0000e0053.0000e0050.9693 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0708 0.0000 0.0708 0.0343 0.0000 0.0343 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e0049.4100e0039.4100e0038.6600e0038.6600e0030.0000 26.0547 26.0547 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2654 Total 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e0040.0708 9.4100e0030.0802 0.0343 8.6600e0030.0429 0.0000 26.0547 26.0547 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2654 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 551

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.6000e0043.4000e0044.0300e0031.0000e0051.2100e0031.0000e0051.2200e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 0.9596 0.9596 3.0000e0053.0000e0050.9693 Total 4.6000e0043.4000e0044.0300e0031.0000e0051.2100e0031.0000e0051.2200e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 0.9596 0.9596 3.0000e0053.0000e0050.9693 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1792 1.6396 1.7182 2.8300e0030.0850 0.0850 0.0799 0.0799 0.0000 243.3115 243.3115 0.0583 0.0000 244.7688 Total 0.1792 1.6396 1.7182 2.8300e0030.0850 0.0850 0.0799 0.0799 0.0000 243.3115 243.3115 0.0583 0.0000 244.7688 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 552

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.7400e0030.0524 0.0162 2.0000e0047.0000e0035.8000e0047.5700e0032.0200e0035.5000e0042.5700e0030.0000 19.9862 19.9862 7.9000e0043.0000e00320.8994 Worker 0.0213 0.0156 0.1862 4.8000e0040.0559 3.3000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 0.0000 44.3330 44.3330 1.5300e0031.3800e00344.7814 Total 0.0230 0.0681 0.2024 6.8000e0040.0629 9.1000e0040.0638 0.0169 8.5000e0040.0177 0.0000 64.3192 64.3192 2.3200e0034.3800e00365.6809 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1792 1.6396 1.7182 2.8300e0030.0850 0.0850 0.0799 0.0799 0.0000 243.3112 243.3112 0.0583 0.0000 244.7685 Total 0.1792 1.6396 1.7182 2.8300e0030.0850 0.0850 0.0799 0.0799 0.0000 243.3112 243.3112 0.0583 0.0000 244.7685 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 553

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.7400e0030.0524 0.0162 2.0000e0047.0000e0035.8000e0047.5700e0032.0200e0035.5000e0042.5700e0030.0000 19.9862 19.9862 7.9000e0043.0000e00320.8994 Worker 0.0213 0.0156 0.1862 4.8000e0040.0559 3.3000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 0.0000 44.3330 44.3330 1.5300e0031.3800e00344.7814 Total 0.0230 0.0681 0.2024 6.8000e0040.0629 9.1000e0040.0638 0.0169 8.5000e0040.0177 0.0000 64.3192 64.3192 2.3200e0034.3800e00365.6809 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0157 0.1439 0.1624 2.7000e0047.0000e0037.0000e0036.5800e0036.5800e0030.0000 23.1805 23.1805 5.5100e0030.0000 23.3183 Total 0.0157 0.1439 0.1624 2.7000e0047.0000e0037.0000e0036.5800e0036.5800e0030.0000 23.1805 23.1805 5.5100e0030.0000 23.3183 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 554

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.0000e0043.9400e0031.3600e0032.0000e0056.7000e0042.0000e0056.9000e0041.9000e0042.0000e0052.1000e0040.0000 1.8241 1.8241 7.0000e0052.7000e0041.9074 Worker 1.8800e0031.3200e0030.0164 4.0000e0055.3200e0033.0000e0055.3500e0031.4100e0033.0000e0051.4400e0030.0000 4.0872 4.0872 1.3000e0041.2000e0044.1268 Total 1.9800e0035.2600e0030.0177 6.0000e0055.9900e0035.0000e0056.0400e0031.6000e0035.0000e0051.6500e0030.0000 5.9114 5.9114 2.0000e0043.9000e0046.0341 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0157 0.1439 0.1624 2.7000e0047.0000e0037.0000e0036.5800e0036.5800e0030.0000 23.1805 23.1805 5.5100e0030.0000 23.3183 Total 0.0157 0.1439 0.1624 2.7000e0047.0000e0037.0000e0036.5800e0036.5800e0030.0000 23.1805 23.1805 5.5100e0030.0000 23.3183 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 555

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.0000e0043.9400e0031.3600e0032.0000e0056.7000e0042.0000e0056.9000e0041.9000e0042.0000e0052.1000e0040.0000 1.8241 1.8241 7.0000e0052.7000e0041.9074 Worker 1.8800e0031.3200e0030.0164 4.0000e0055.3200e0033.0000e0055.3500e0031.4100e0033.0000e0051.4400e0030.0000 4.0872 4.0872 1.3000e0041.2000e0044.1268 Total 1.9800e0035.2600e0030.0177 6.0000e0055.9900e0035.0000e0056.0400e0031.6000e0035.0000e0051.6500e0030.0000 5.9114 5.9114 2.0000e0043.9000e0046.0341 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e0045.1000e0035.1000e0034.6900e0034.6900e0030.0000 20.0269 20.0269 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1888 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e0045.1000e0035.1000e0034.6900e0034.6900e0030.0000 20.0269 20.0269 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1888 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 556

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.3000e0043.0000e0043.7200e0031.0000e0051.2100e0031.0000e0051.2200e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 0.9289 0.9289 3.0000e0053.0000e0050.9379 Total 4.3000e0043.0000e0043.7200e0031.0000e0051.2100e0031.0000e0051.2200e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 0.9289 0.9289 3.0000e0053.0000e0050.9379 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e0045.1000e0035.1000e0034.6900e0034.6900e0030.0000 20.0268 20.0268 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1888 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e0045.1000e0035.1000e0034.6900e0034.6900e0030.0000 20.0268 20.0268 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1888 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 557

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.3000e0043.0000e0043.7200e0031.0000e0051.2100e0031.0000e0051.2200e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 0.9289 0.9289 3.0000e0053.0000e0050.9379 Total 4.3000e0043.0000e0043.7200e0031.0000e0051.2100e0031.0000e0051.2200e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 0.9289 0.9289 3.0000e0053.0000e0050.9379 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.6772 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9200e0030.0130 0.0181 3.0000e0057.1000e0047.1000e0047.1000e0047.1000e0040.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e0040.0000 2.5571 Total 0.6791 0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e0057.1000e0047.1000e0047.1000e0047.1000e0040.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e0040.0000 2.5571 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 558

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.7000e0042.6000e0043.2300e0031.0000e0051.0500e0031.0000e0051.0500e0032.8000e0041.0000e0052.8000e0040.0000 0.8051 0.8051 3.0000e0052.0000e0050.8129 Total 3.7000e0042.6000e0043.2300e0031.0000e0051.0500e0031.0000e0051.0500e0032.8000e0041.0000e0052.8000e0040.0000 0.8051 0.8051 3.0000e0052.0000e0050.8129 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.6772 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9200e0030.0130 0.0181 3.0000e0057.1000e0047.1000e0047.1000e0047.1000e0040.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e0040.0000 2.5571 Total 0.6791 0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e0057.1000e0047.1000e0047.1000e0047.1000e0040.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e0040.0000 2.5571 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 559

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.7000e0042.6000e0043.2300e0031.0000e0051.0500e0031.0000e0051.0500e0032.8000e0041.0000e0052.8000e0040.0000 0.8051 0.8051 3.0000e0052.0000e0050.8129 Total 3.7000e0042.6000e0043.2300e0031.0000e0051.0500e0031.0000e0051.0500e0032.8000e0041.0000e0052.8000e0040.0000 0.8051 0.8051 3.0000e0052.0000e0050.8129 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 560
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.3504 0.4282 3.2638 6.4800e0030.6826 5.2200e0030.6878 0.1823 4.8700e0030.1871 0.0000 597.8210 597.8210 0.0422 0.0291 607.5516 Unmitigated 0.3504 0.4282 3.2638 6.4800e0030.6826 5.2200e0030.6878 0.1823 4.8700e0030.1871 0.0000 597.8210 597.8210 0.0422 0.0291 607.5516

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Condo/Townhouse 658.80 732.60 565.20 1,812,497 1,812,497 Health Club 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 658.80 732.60 565.20 1,812,497 1,812,497
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Condo/Townhouse 10.80 7.30 7.50 32.90 18.00 49.10 86 11 3 Health Club 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Condo/Townhouse 0.543528 0.058189 0.173108 0.133952 0.027894 0.007577 0.011427 0.006062 0.000688 0.000393 0.029232 0.000646 0.007304 Health Club 0.543528 0.058189 0.173108 0.133952 0.027894 0.007577 0.011427 0.006062 0.000688 0.000393 0.029232 0.000646 0.007304

5.0 Energy Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 561
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 81.9412 81.9412 6.9200e0038.4000e00482.3639 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 81.9412 81.9412 6.9200e0038.4000e00482.3639 NaturalGas
Mitigated

8.3800e0030.0718 0.0319 4.6000e0045.7900e0035.7900e0035.7900e0035.7900e0030.0000 82.9062 82.9062 1.5900e0031.5200e00383.3989 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

8.3800e0030.0718 0.0319 4.6000e0045.7900e0035.7900e0035.7900e0035.7900e0030.0000 82.9062 82.9062 1.5900e0031.5200e00383.3989

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 562

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e

1.48549e
+006

8.0100e0030.0685 0.0291 4.4000e0045.5300e0035.5300e0035.5300e0035.5300e0030.0000 79.2714 79.2714 1.5200e0031.4500e00379.7425 Health Club 68113.6 3.7000e0043.3400e0032.8000e0032.0000e0052.5000e0042.5000e0042.5000e0042.5000e0040.0000 3.6348 3.6348 7.0000e0057.0000e0053.6564 Total 8.3800e0030.0718 0.0319 4.6000e0045.7800e0035.7800e0035.7800e0035.7800e0030.0000 82.9062 82.9062 1.5900e0031.5200e00383.3989 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e

1.48549e
+006

8.0100e0030.0685 0.0291 4.4000e0045.5300e0035.5300e0035.5300e0035.5300e0030.0000 79.2714 79.2714 1.5200e0031.4500e00379.7425 Health Club 68113.6 3.7000e0043.3400e0032.8000e0032.0000e0052.5000e0042.5000e0042.5000e0042.5000e0040.0000 3.6348 3.6348 7.0000e0057.0000e0053.6564 Total 8.3800e0030.0718 0.0319 4.6000e0045.7800e0035.7800e0035.7800e0035.7800e0030.0000 82.9062 82.9062 1.5900e0031.5200e00383.3989 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 563

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e
434909 77.1291 6.5100e0037.9000e00477.5270
Health Club 27133.9 4.8121 4.1000e0045.0000e0054.8369 Total 81.9412 6.9200e0038.4000e00482.3639
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e
434909 77.1291 6.5100e0037.9000e00477.5270
Health Club 27133.9 4.8121 4.1000e0045.0000e0054.8369 Total 81.9412 6.9200e0038.4000e00482.3639
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 564

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.6092 7.7100e0030.6684 4.0000e0053.7000e0033.7000e0033.7000e0033.7000e0030.0000 1.0917 1.0917 1.0500e0030.0000 1.1179 Unmitigated 0.6092 7.7100e0030.6684 4.0000e0053.7000e0033.7000e0033.7000e0033.7000e0030.0000 1.0917 1.0917 1.0500e0030.0000 1.1179 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 565

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0677 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.5213 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0201 7.7100e0030.6684 4.0000e0053.7000e0033.7000e0033.7000e0033.7000e0030.0000 1.0917 1.0917 1.0500e0030.0000 1.1179 Total 0.6092 7.7100e0030.6684 4.0000e0053.7000e0033.7000e0033.7000e0033.7000e0030.0000 1.0917 1.0917 1.0500e0030.0000 1.1179 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 566

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0677 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.5213 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0201 7.7100e0030.6684 4.0000e0053.7000e0033.7000e0033.7000e0033.7000e0030.0000 1.0917 1.0917 1.0500e0030.0000 1.1179 Total 0.6092 7.7100e0030.6684 4.0000e0053.7000e0033.7000e0033.7000e0033.7000e0030.0000 1.0917 1.0917 1.0500e0030.0000 1.1179 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 567
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 23.4288 0.1992 4.8800e00329.8636
Unmitigated 23.4288 0.1992 4.8800e00329.8636

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e

5.86386 /

3.69678

22.6851 0.1928 4.7200e00328.9138
Health Club 0.19399 /

0.118897

0.7438 6.3800e0031.6000e0040.9498
Total 23.4288 0.1992 4.8800e00329.8636
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 568

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e

5.86386 /

3.69678

22.6851 0.1928 4.7200e00328.9138
Health Club 0.19399 /

0.118897

0.7438 6.3800e0031.6000e0040.9498
Total 23.4288 0.1992 4.8800e00329.8636
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 12.1998 0.7210 0.0000 30.2244
Unmitigated 12.1998 0.7210 0.0000 30.2244
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 569

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e

41.4 8.4038 0.4967 0.0000 20.8201
Health Club 18.7 3.7959 0.2243 0.0000 9.4043
Total 12.1998 0.7210 0.0000 30.2244
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e

41.4 8.4038 0.4967 0.0000 20.8201
Health Club 18.7 3.7959 0.2243 0.0000 9.4043
Total 12.1998 0.7210 0.0000 30.2244
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 570

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 30 Date: 11/5/2021 10:33 AM Portofino Duplex Project (Modified Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 571
Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) Ventura County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - In Oxnard Airport traffic pattern zone, limiting density to max of 25% of 7.6-acre site.

Construction Phase -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Strip Mall 82.76 1000sqft 7.60 82,764.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
8 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics

2.0 Emissions Summary
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2023
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 82,760.00 82,764.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.90 7.60
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 572

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.2441 2.2574 2.2446 4.1200e0030.2059 0.1115 0.3174 0.0948 0.1046 0.1994 0.0000 360.5672 360.5672 0.0796 5.2400e003364.1184 2023 0.3964 0.1154 0.1689 2.7000e0041.6100e0035.8200e0037.4300e0034.3000e0045.4100e0035.8400e0030.0000 23.8187 23.8187 6.6700e0034.0000e00523.9964 Maximum 0.3964 2.2574 2.2446 4.1200e0030.2059 0.1115 0.3174 0.0948 0.1046 0.1994 0.0000 360.5672 360.5672 0.0796 5.2400e003364.1184 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.2441 2.2574 2.2446 4.1200e0030.2059 0.1115 0.3174 0.0948 0.1046 0.1994 0.0000 360.5668 360.5668 0.0796 5.2400e003364.1180 2023 0.3964 0.1154 0.1689 2.7000e0041.6100e0035.8200e0037.4300e0034.3000e0045.4100e0035.8400e0030.0000 23.8187 23.8187 6.6700e0034.0000e00523.9964 Maximum 0.3964 2.2574 2.2446 4.1200e0030.2059 0.1115 0.3174 0.0948 0.1046 0.1994 0.0000 360.5668 360.5668 0.0796 5.2400e003364.1180 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 573
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-1-2022 3-31-2022 0.7225 0.7225
2 4-1-2022 6-30-2022 0.5899 0.5899
3 7-1-2022 9-30-2022 0.5964 0.5964
4 10-1-2022 12-31-2022 0.5956 0.5956
5 1-1-2023 3-31-2023 0.5078 0.5078
Highest 0.7225 0.7225

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.3617 1.0000e0057.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4800e0031.4800e0030.0000 0.0000 1.5800e003 Energy 8.9000e0048.0700e0036.7800e0035.0000e0056.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0040.0000 172.1533 172.1533 0.0140 1.8300e003173.0483 Mobile 1.4109 1.4086 10.8635 0.0189 1.9480 0.0160 1.9640 0.5201 0.0149 0.5350 0.0000 1,741.428 7 1,741.428
7 0.1547 0.0984 1,774.629
8 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 17.6399 0.0000 17.6399 1.0425 0.0000 43.7021 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.9448 21.5590 23.5038 0.2016 4.9400e00330.0145 Total 1.7735 1.4167 10.8710 0.0189 1.9480 0.0166 1.9646 0.5201 0.0155 0.5356 19.5848 1,935.142 4 1,954.727
2 1.4128 0.1052 2,021.396
2 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 574

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.3617 1.0000e0057.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4800e0031.4800e0030.0000 0.0000 1.5800e003 Energy 8.9000e0048.0700e0036.7800e0035.0000e0056.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0040.0000 172.1533 172.1533 0.0140 1.8300e003173.0483 Mobile 1.4109 1.4086 10.8635 0.0189 1.9480 0.0160 1.9640 0.5201 0.0149 0.5350 0.0000 1,741.428 7 1,741.428
7 0.1547 0.0984 1,774.629
8 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 17.6399 0.0000 17.6399 1.0425 0.0000 43.7021 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.9448 21.5590 23.5038 0.2016 4.9400e00330.0145 Total 1.7735 1.4167 10.8710 0.0189 1.9480 0.0166 1.9646 0.5201 0.0155 0.5356 19.5848 1,935.142 4 1,954.727
2 1.4128 0.1052 2,021.396
2 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/1/2022 1/14/2022 5 10 2 Grading Grading 1/15/2022 2/11/2022 5 20
3 Building Construction Building Construction 2/12/2022 12/30/2022 5 230 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 575
4 Paving Paving 12/31/2022 1/27/2023 5 20
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/28/2023 2/24/2023 5 20 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 124,146; Non-Residential Outdoor: 41,382; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 576

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0983 0.0000 0.0983 0.0505 0.0000 0.0505 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e0048.0600e0038.0600e0037.4200e0037.4200e0030.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8549 Total 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e0040.0983 8.0600e0030.1064 0.0505 7.4200e0030.0579 0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8549 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 26.00 14.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 577

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e0042.0000e0042.4200e0031.0000e0057.3000e0040.0000 7.3000e0041.9000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.5758 0.5758 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.5816 Total 2.8000e0042.0000e0042.4200e0031.0000e0057.3000e0040.0000 7.3000e0041.9000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.5758 0.5758 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.5816 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0983 0.0000 0.0983 0.0505 0.0000 0.0505 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e0048.0600e0038.0600e0037.4200e0037.4200e0030.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8549 Total 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e0040.0983 8.0600e0030.1064 0.0505 7.4200e0030.0579 0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8549 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 578

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e0042.0000e0042.4200e0031.0000e0057.3000e0040.0000 7.3000e0041.9000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.5758 0.5758 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.5816 Total 2.8000e0042.0000e0042.4200e0031.0000e0057.3000e0040.0000 7.3000e0041.9000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.5758 0.5758 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.5816 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0708 0.0000 0.0708 0.0343 0.0000 0.0343 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e0049.4100e0039.4100e0038.6600e0038.6600e0030.0000 26.0548 26.0548 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2654 Total 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e0040.0708 9.4100e0030.0802 0.0343 8.6600e0030.0429 0.0000 26.0548 26.0548 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2654 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 579

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.6000e0043.4000e0044.0300e0031.0000e0051.2100e0031.0000e0051.2200e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 0.9596 0.9596 3.0000e0053.0000e0050.9693 Total 4.6000e0043.4000e0044.0300e0031.0000e0051.2100e0031.0000e0051.2200e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 0.9596 0.9596 3.0000e0053.0000e0050.9693 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0708 0.0000 0.0708 0.0343 0.0000 0.0343 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e0049.4100e0039.4100e0038.6600e0038.6600e0030.0000 26.0547 26.0547 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2654 Total 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e0040.0708 9.4100e0030.0802 0.0343 8.6600e0030.0429 0.0000 26.0547 26.0547 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2654 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 580

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.6000e0043.4000e0044.0300e0031.0000e0051.2100e0031.0000e0051.2200e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 0.9596 0.9596 3.0000e0053.0000e0050.9693 Total 4.6000e0043.4000e0044.0300e0031.0000e0051.2100e0031.0000e0051.2200e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 0.9596 0.9596 3.0000e0053.0000e0050.9693 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1962 1.7958 1.8818 3.1000e0030.0930 0.0930 0.0875 0.0875 0.0000 266.4840 266.4840 0.0638 0.0000 268.0801 Total 0.1962 1.7958 1.8818 3.1000e0030.0930 0.0930 0.0875 0.0875 0.0000 266.4840 266.4840 0.0638 0.0000 268.0801 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 581

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.6700e0030.0804 0.0248 3.1000e0040.0107 8.8000e0040.0116 3.0900e0038.5000e0043.9400e0030.0000 30.6455 30.6455 1.2100e0034.6000e00332.0458 Worker 9.1800e0036.7400e0030.0803 2.1000e0040.0241 1.4000e0040.0243 6.4000e0031.3000e0046.5300e0030.0000 19.1278 19.1278 6.6000e0045.9000e00419.3213 Total 0.0119 0.0871 0.1052 5.2000e0040.0348 1.0200e0030.0359 9.4900e0039.8000e0040.0105 0.0000 49.7733 49.7733 1.8700e0035.1900e00351.3671 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1962 1.7958 1.8818 3.1000e0030.0930 0.0930 0.0875 0.0875 0.0000 266.4837 266.4837 0.0638 0.0000 268.0798 Total 0.1962 1.7958 1.8818 3.1000e0030.0930 0.0930 0.0875 0.0875 0.0000 266.4837 266.4837 0.0638 0.0000 268.0798 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 582

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.6700e0030.0804 0.0248 3.1000e0040.0107 8.8000e0040.0116 3.0900e0038.5000e0043.9400e0030.0000 30.6455 30.6455 1.2100e0034.6000e00332.0458 Worker 9.1800e0036.7400e0030.0803 2.1000e0040.0241 1.4000e0040.0243 6.4000e0031.3000e0046.5300e0030.0000 19.1278 19.1278 6.6000e0045.9000e00419.3213 Total 0.0119 0.0871 0.1052 5.2000e0040.0348 1.0200e0030.0359 9.4900e0039.8000e0040.0105 0.0000 49.7733 49.7733 1.8700e0035.1900e00351.3671 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 583

3.5 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 584

3.5 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e0045.1000e0035.1000e0034.6900e0034.6900e0030.0000 20.0269 20.0269 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1888 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e0045.1000e0035.1000e0034.6900e0034.6900e0030.0000 20.0269 20.0269 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1888 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 585

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.3000e0043.0000e0043.7200e0031.0000e0051.2100e0031.0000e0051.2200e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 0.9289 0.9289 3.0000e0053.0000e0050.9379 Total 4.3000e0043.0000e0043.7200e0031.0000e0051.2100e0031.0000e0051.2200e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 0.9289 0.9289 3.0000e0053.0000e0050.9379 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e0045.1000e0035.1000e0034.6900e0034.6900e0030.0000 20.0268 20.0268 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1888 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e0045.1000e0035.1000e0034.6900e0034.6900e0030.0000 20.0268 20.0268 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1888 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 586

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.3000e0043.0000e0043.7200e0031.0000e0051.2100e0031.0000e0051.2200e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 0.9289 0.9289 3.0000e0053.0000e0050.9379 Total 4.3000e0043.0000e0043.7200e0031.0000e0051.2100e0031.0000e0051.2200e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 0.9289 0.9289 3.0000e0053.0000e0050.9379 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.3836 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9200e0030.0130 0.0181 3.0000e0057.1000e0047.1000e0047.1000e0047.1000e0040.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e0040.0000 2.5571 Total 0.3855 0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e0057.1000e0047.1000e0047.1000e0047.1000e0040.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e0040.0000 2.5571 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 587

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.4000e0041.0000e0041.2400e0030.0000 4.0000e0040.0000 4.1000e0041.1000e0040.0000 1.1000e0040.0000 0.3096 0.3096 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.3126 Total 1.4000e0041.0000e0041.2400e0030.0000 4.0000e0040.0000 4.1000e0041.1000e0040.0000 1.1000e0040.0000 0.3096 0.3096 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.3126 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.3836 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9200e0030.0130 0.0181 3.0000e0057.1000e0047.1000e0047.1000e0047.1000e0040.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e0040.0000 2.5571 Total 0.3855 0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e0057.1000e0047.1000e0047.1000e0047.1000e0040.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e0040.0000 2.5571 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 588

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.4000e0041.0000e0041.2400e0030.0000 4.0000e0040.0000 4.1000e0041.1000e0040.0000 1.1000e0040.0000 0.3096 0.3096 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.3126 Total 1.4000e0041.0000e0041.2400e0030.0000 4.0000e0040.0000 4.1000e0041.1000e0040.0000 1.1000e0040.0000 0.3096 0.3096 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.3126 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 589

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.4109 1.4086 10.8635 0.0189 1.9480 0.0160 1.9640 0.5201 0.0149 0.5350 0.0000 1,741.428 7 1,741.428
7 0.1547 0.0984 1,774.629
8 Unmitigated 1.4109 1.4086 10.8635 0.0189 1.9480 0.0160 1.9640 0.5201 0.0149 0.5350 0.0000 1,741.428 7 1,741.428
7 0.1547 0.0984 1,774.629
8 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Strip Mall 3,667.92 3,479.23 1690.79 5,172,230 5,172,230 Total 3,667.92 3,479.23 1,690.79 5,172,230 5,172,230
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Strip Mall 9.50 7.30 7.30 16.60 64.40 19.00 45 40 15

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Strip Mall 0.543528 0.058189 0.173108 0.133952 0.027894 0.007577 0.011427 0.006062 0.000688 0.000393 0.029232 0.000646 0.007304 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 590

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 163.3642 163.3642 0.0138 1.6700e003164.2070 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 163.3642 163.3642 0.0138 1.6700e003164.2070 NaturalGas
Mitigated

8.9000e0048.0700e0036.7800e0035.0000e0056.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0040.0000 8.7890 8.7890 1.7000e0041.6000e0048.8413 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

8.9000e0048.0700e0036.7800e0035.0000e0056.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0040.0000 8.7890 8.7890 1.7000e0041.6000e0048.8413

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 591

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Strip Mall 164700 8.9000e0048.0700e0036.7800e0035.0000e0056.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0040.0000 8.7890 8.7890 1.7000e0041.6000e0048.8413 Total 8.9000e0048.0700e0036.7800e0035.0000e0056.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0040.0000 8.7890 8.7890 1.7000e0041.6000e0048.8413 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Strip Mall 164700 8.9000e0048.0700e0036.7800e0035.0000e0056.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0040.0000 8.7890 8.7890 1.7000e0041.6000e0048.8413 Total 8.9000e0048.0700e0036.7800e0035.0000e0056.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0040.0000 8.7890 8.7890 1.7000e0041.6000e0048.8413 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 592

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Strip Mall 921163 163.3642 0.0138 1.6700e003164.2070
Total 163.3642 0.0138 1.6700e003164.2070
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Strip Mall 921163 163.3642 0.0138 1.6700e003164.2070
Total 163.3642 0.0138 1.6700e003164.2070
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 593
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.3617 1.0000e0057.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4800e0031.4800e0030.0000 0.0000 1.5800e003 Unmitigated 0.3617 1.0000e0057.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4800e0031.4800e0030.0000 0.0000 1.5800e003

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0384 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.3232 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 7.0000e0051.0000e0057.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4800e0031.4800e0030.0000 0.0000 1.5800e003 Total 0.3617 1.0000e0057.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4800e0031.4800e0030.0000 0.0000 1.5800e003 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 594

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0384 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.3232 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 7.0000e0051.0000e0057.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4800e0031.4800e0030.0000 0.0000 1.5800e003 Total 0.3617 1.0000e0057.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4800e0031.4800e0030.0000 0.0000 1.5800e003 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 595
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 23.5038 0.2016 4.9400e00330.0145
Unmitigated 23.5038 0.2016 4.9400e00330.0145

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Strip Mall 6.13024 /

3.75725

23.5038 0.2016 4.9400e00330.0145
Total 23.5038 0.2016 4.9400e00330.0145
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 596

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Strip Mall 6.13024 /

3.75725

23.5038 0.2016 4.9400e00330.0145
Total 23.5038 0.2016 4.9400e00330.0145
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 17.6399 1.0425 0.0000 43.7021
Unmitigated 17.6399 1.0425 0.0000 43.7021
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 597

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Strip Mall 86.9 17.6399 1.0425 0.0000 43.7021
Total 17.6399 1.0425 0.0000 43.7021
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Strip Mall 86.9 17.6399 1.0425 0.0000 43.7021
Total 17.6399 1.0425 0.0000 43.7021
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 598

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 28 Date: 11/5/2021 10:27 AM Dunkirk Drive, Tract Number 5640 Project (Original Project) - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652

ATTACHMENT Q
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD

ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
(MND) 2004-11 TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE

DESIGNATION OF THE PROPERTY FROM BUSINESS RESEARCH PARK TO

RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM, CHANGE THE ZONE FROM BUSINESS RESEARCH PARK TO MULTIPLE-FAMILY, AND ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 90,

TWO-STORY CONDOMINIUM DWELLING UNITS EACH WITH ATTACHED 2-CAR GARAGES, 214 TOTAL VISITOR PARKING SPACES, COMMON SWIMMING POOL AND PLAYGROUND AREA, 3,281 SQUARE-FOOT

RECREATION BUILDING, ENTRY GATES AND PERIMETER WALLS,

PRIVATE ROADS, DETENTION BASINS, LANDSCAPING AND ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS ON A 7.61-ACRE SITE LOCATED ALONG THE

SOUTH SIDE OF FIFTH STREET AT THE INTERSECTION OF PORTOFINO PLACE (APNs: 185-0-221-025, 185-0-221-265, AND 185-0-223-015). FILED BY THE LAW OFFICE OF K.M. NEISWENDER, P.O. BOX 1225, BLUE JAY, CA 92317, THE APPLICANT.

WHEREAS, the Law Offices of K.M. Neiswender filed entitlement applications with the City of Oxnard on November 7, 2019, General Plan Amendment (PZ 20-620-02), Zone Change (PZ 20-570-02), Special Use Permit (PZ 19-500-04), and a Tentative Subdivision Map (PZ 20-300-02); and
WHEREAS, if the aforementioned entitlement applications are collectively approved by the City of Oxnard, the project would be permitted to develop a 7.61 acre project site with 90, two-story condominium dwelling units each with attached 2-car garages, 214 total visitor parking spaces, common swimming pool and playground area, 3,281 square-foot recreation building, entry gates and perimeter walls, private roads, detention basins, landscaping and associated site improvements at the subject project site (APNs: 185-0-221-025, 185-0-221-265, AND 185-0-223-015) (“Project”); and WHEREAS, the project was initially reviewed by the City Council as a Pre-Application (PZ 18-600-02) on March 19, 2019, where the City Council discussed the ability for the project to incorporate inclusionary housing on the project site instead of requesting to pay the affordable housing in-lieu fee payment; and WHEREAS, the project applicant mailed notices to all property owners within the Sea View Estates neighborhood and presented the project at the April 20, 2020 Community Workshop; and
Whereas, on November 9, 2004, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Res. Code § 21000 et seq.: “CEQA”) and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq.: “State CEQA Guidelines”), the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for The Dunkirk Drive Project (MND 2004-11); and
Whereas, the MND adequately addressed and mitigated the potential environmental impacts associated with the Dunkirk Drive project, which included a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Subdivision Map and Planned Residential Group/Special Use Permit for commercial development on a 7.6-acre portion of the project 653
Resolution No. 2021-XX – [Addendum No. 1 to Final MND 2004-11] City Council Hearing Date: January 18, 2022

Page 2 of 4 ends
← All documents from this meeting