Oxnard City Council
July 28, 2022

WHEREAS, The vacation of this easement and the ultimate use of the parcel for residential use is consistent with the land use designation on the subject site. Future use of the parcel will be required to comply with all City codes and regulations; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the Oxnard reviewed the vacation request at its regular meeting of June 2, 2022 in accordance with Government Code section 65402 and determined that the vacation is consistent with the goals and policies of the City’s adopted General Plan and recommended that the City Council consider and approve the easement vacation request.

WHEREAS, on June 21, 2022, the City Council of the City of Oxnard reviewed the right-of-way vacation request in accordance with the general vacation procedures contained in the Streets and Highways Code Section 8320 and adopted Resolution 15,599 to declare its intention to vacate the subject right-of-way. The City Council set the request for a public hearing on Tuesday, July 28, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. at the at the City Council Chambers of the City of Oxnard located at 305 West Third Street in Oxnard, California.; and WHEREAS, on July 28, 2022, the City Council of the City of Oxnard conducted a public hearing for the requested vacation of the utility easements located at along the frontage of the two parcels located at 2700 and 2750 North Ventura Road, which was duly noticed, and at which time all persons desiring to be heard were heard; and
WHEREAS, evidence was submitted and considered to include without limitation: plans submitted by the Applicant; written information submitted with the application; oral testimony from Staff, the applicant, and the public; staff report, dated July 26, 2022, which was incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein; and additional information submitted during the hearing; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD:

SECTION 1. The City Council, pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq., “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15000 et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”), finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed vacation of the thirty-eight (38) foot wide utility easement, totaling approximately 33,409 square feet, along the frontage of the two parcels located at 2700 and 2750 North Ventura Road would have a significant effect on the environment (CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of Oxnard does hereby vacated the thirty-eight (38) foot wide utility easement, totaling approximately 33,409 square feet, along the frontage of the two parcels located at 2700 and 2750 North Ventura Road. 448
Resolution No.________
July 28, 2022

SECTION 3. The map attached hereto as Exhibit “A” shows the easements to be vacated and shall be on file in the office of the City Clerk located at 300 West Third Street, Fourth Floor, Oxnard, California 93030.

SECTION 4. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign the quitclaim deed associated with this request and any additional documentation necessary to facilitate the vacation of the easement referenced in this Resolution at such time that the appeal of the Fore Apartments project has been resolved in a manner that would allow the Fore Apartments project to move forward as proposed.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oxnard on this 28th day of July, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

RECUSE:

John Zaragoza, Mayor
ATTEST: ________________________________
Rose Chaparro, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
Stephen M. Fischer, City Attorney

EXHIBIT
A Map of Utility Easement
449
Utility Easement Vacation for
2700 and 2750 North Ventura Road -
Fore Apartments at RiverPark Project
1 City Council
July 28, 2022
Joe Pearson II, Interim Planning & Environmental Services Manager Vyto Adomaitis, Director of Community Development
450
Project Location (Utility Easement)
2 Subject Site: 2700/2750 Ventura Road
Located within RiverPark Area
451
Project Description (Easement Vacation)
• Vacation of a thirty-eight (38)
foot wide utility easement,
totaling approximately 33,409
square feet, along the frontage
of the two parcels located at
2700 and 2750 North Ventura
Road.
3 3
452
General Plan & Zoning Maps (Utility Easement)
4 Commercial Regional (CR)
General Plan Land Use Designation Zoning Designation
RiverPark Specific Plan (RPSP)
453
Background
● The RiverPark Specific Plan was adopted by the City Council on September 10, 2002.
● Seven previous amendments to the RiverPark Specific Plan have been approved. The most recent was approved on April 5, 2022. The current specific plan would allow for up to 4,068 dwelling units or 2,098,000 square feet of commercial development depending on the development options chosen.
5 454
• On May 23, 2022, the Community Development Director approved a Development Design Review Permit for the construction of a 409,257 square foot 5-story apartment building with 333 residential units and a 171,066 square foot 6-story centrally located parking structure with 510 residential parking spaces, rooftop deck on a 4.23-acre project site. • Following the project approval an appeal was filed on May 31, 2022. 6 Background (Continued)
455
Planning Commission Determination
Government Code Section 65402, requires that real property acquisition or disposition, street vacation or abandonment, public building or structure construction be consistent with the General Plan and Local Coastal Land Use Plan as to location, purpose and extent.
• On June 2, 2022, The Planning Commission held a public hearing consistent with Government Code Section 65402 the easement vacation consistent with the 2030 General Plan.
• Unanimously (6-0) adopted Resolution 2022-25:
- Finding the action was in conformance with the 2030 General Plan. 7 456
City Council
➢ On June 21, 2022, The City Council unanimously adopted Resolution 15,599
● Declaring its intention to conduct the required proceedings for vacation of the subject easement.
● Directed the City Clerk to schedule a noticed public hearing no less than fifteen days after the Council’s initiation of the vacation proceedings, to be held on July 26, 2022 ➢ The adoption of City Council 15,599 by the City Council is in accordance with the Streets and Highways Code Section 8320:
● Requires the City Council to review the street vacation request and adopt a resolution of intention to vacate the right-of-way
● The City Council is required to direct the City Clerk to schedule a public hearing not less than 15 days after the initiation of proceedings
8 457
Purpose of Easement Vacation
• The Vacation would facilitate the development of the Fore Apartments at RiverPark project.
• As the Fore Apartments at RiverPark project is conditioned to provide a 16-foot Public Right-of-Way dedication, there will be sufficient spaces provided for the placement of public utilities within the new and existing Public Right of Way.
• The vacation was reviewed by the City staff as part of the Fore Apartment at RiverPark project and the easement was found to no longer be needed, with the new dedication.
458
9 Environmental Determination
Environmental Determination
Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed acquisition of the Access Road located south of 2700 Ventura Road/901 Town Center Drive, including the vacation of the thirty-eight (38) foot wide utility easement, totaling approximately 33,409 square feet, along the frontage of the two parcels located at 2700 and 2750 North Ventura Road would have a significant effect on the environment (CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), and staff recommends that the City Council accept a Notice of Exemption.

All physical improvements and environmental impacts associated with the development of the residential project, including the improvements to adjacent access road were analyzed as part of the entitlement process, and the development and uses associated with the residential project were determined to be covered under the RiverPark EIR (FEIR 00-03) and subsequent addenda.
10 10 459
Staff Recommendation
That the City Council:

1. Find the project Exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).; and

2. Adopt a Resolution to vacate its right, title and interest in a thirty-eight (38) foot wide utility easement, totaling approximately 33,409 square feet, along the frontage of the two parcels located at 2700 and 2750 North Ventura Road; and

3. Authorize the Mayor to sign a Quitclaim Deed releasing City authority and/or rights to the access utility easement for assessor parcel numbers 132-0-100-095 & 132-0-100-085
11 11 460
12 461

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM NO. L.3
DATE: July 28, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Vyto Adomaitis, Community Development Director, (805) 385-7882, [email protected] SUBJECT: Subdivision of a 1.78 acre lot into two lots totaling 0.79 acre and 0.99 acre, located at 1600 Ives Avenue (APNs: 220-0-274-015, -025, -095). Filed by Hassan Amirsadeghi on behalf of the Philippine Center of Ventura County, property owner, 1600 Ives Avenue, Oxnard, California 93033. (0/5/5)

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:

1. Conduct a public hearing;

2. Find the project to be Categorically Exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15332 (Infill Development); and

3. Adopt a Resolution approving Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-300-04 for a tentative parcel map, subject to certain findings and conditions.
(This item did not originate in Committee.)
Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video: https://youtu.be/u2SFbTU7KR8

BACKGROUND
On February 17, 2022, the Planning Commission found the project exempt from CEQA and approved 6-0 (one member abstained) development entitlements necessary to allow for the demolition of an existing events center, subdivision of a

1.78 acre lot into two lots for the development of two drive-through restaurant facilities. The drive-through restaurants consist of a 983 square-foot coffee house (Starbucks) with drive-through on the 0.79 acre lot, a 2,533 square-foot fast food restaurant with drive-through on a 0.99 acre site, and related site improvements including 72 shared parking spaces, sidewalks, patios, and landscaping on a site located at 1600 Ives Avenue. The Commissions consideration included Resolution No. 2022-15 approving Planning and Zoning Permit Nos. 21-500-06 (Special Use Permit) and 21-500-07 (Special Use Permit) and recommended the City Council approve Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-300-04 (Tentative Parcel Map), subject to certain findings and conditions (Attachment 4).

With the Planning Commission’s approval of the project on February 17, 2022, the only remaining item needing action before the City Council is the Tentative Parcel Map.

DISCUSSION
Existing & Surrounding Land Uses
The project site is a developed lot that is bounded by streets on three sides: Ives Avenue to the north; Statham Boulevard 462
to the west; and Oxnard Boulevard to the south. The site is currently developed with an 8,868 square-foot events center with a parking area and associated infrastructure improvements. For more information regarding previous development on the subject property, please refer to Section 3 of the Planning Commission Staff Report (Attachment 3).

Site Design
Approval of the parcel map will allow the proposed two commercial developments to be sold independently and require each development to provide reciprocal access and parking for both lots via a recorded agreement between the two property owners and their successors in interest so that the two lots function as one development. For more information regarding the proposed site design of the parcel map, please refer to Section 6e of the Planning Commission Staff Report (Attachment 3).

The project site has access from Ives Avenue via an existing driveway. The existing driveway will provide access to the site and allow for vehicle circulation around the site. While there is shared access and shared parking areas located between the two proposed buildings, the drive-through facilities of each building are designed to be self-sufficient. Selfsufficient means customers are able to access the sites through the driveways adjacent to the drive-through facility, access the drive-through lane and parking at the rear of the site, then exit the drive-through lane and parking area through the same driveway, for each of the respective facilities. Additionally, if one of the sites were not redeveloped, the other site could still be redeveloped.

Tentative Parcel Map
The tentative map will create the two lots, allowing the two commercial developments to be sold and built with independent utilities and service needs. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2022-15 includes Conditions of Approval (COA) for the parcel map. For a complete list of conditions, please refer to Planning Commission Resolution No. 2022- 15 (Attachment 4). Some of the conditions will require that the Parcel Map be updated prior to being submitted for technical review, such as:

1. COA 3 requires the construction of off-site and on-site improvements for the project, including structures, paving, and landscaping.

2. COA 12 requires the subdivider to record a reciprocal access and parking agreement for the two new lots.

3. COA 13 requires that the subdivider establish a property owner’s association that will be responsible for the maintenance of parking, landscaping, lighting, and other common areas and facilities.

4. COA 25 requires the developer to provide additional easements to the City for the sidewalk and curb ramp at the new driveway entry and the onesie water system.

In accordance with Division 2 of Chapter 15 “Subdivision Ordinance” of the Oxnard City Code, the City Council is the final decision-making body for subdivision applications. As proposed, the two lot subdivision complies with the minimum standards of the C-2-PD zone. For more information regarding the C-2-PD zone standards, please refer to Section 6c of the Planning Commission Staff Report (Attachment 3).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
In accordance with Section 15332 (Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, projects involving “in-fill development” may be found to be exempt from the requirements of the CEQA. As identified in the draft Resolution prepared for this request, and as recommended by the Planning Commission, the project can be characterized as in-fill development and meets the requirement of a Class 32 Categorical Exemption. The Planning Commission found there is no substantial evidence that the Project may have a significant effect on the environment and recommends that the City Council find the project to be Categorically Exempt from environmental review pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Infill Development), and direct the Planning & Environmental Services Manager to file a Notice of Exemption (Attachment 5) with the Ventura County Clerk pursuant to Section 15062 of the State CEQA Guidelines within five (5) working days of passage, approval and adoption of the Project.

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
463
This agenda item supports Economic Development strategy. The purpose of Economic Development strategy is to focus on the retention and expansion of Oxnard businesses by increasing the skills and employability of our local workforce, invite new business investments, and target site-based redevelopment opportunities.

This agenda item supports the Quality of Life strategy. The purpose of the Quality of Life strategy is to restore and increase quality services and programs that enrich Oxnard's diverse community, promotes safe neighborhoods, encourages community engagement, and supports our residents in their efforts to improve their quality of life.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The approval of the map provides the opportunity for future development that will result in increased property tax revenue to the City. The developer will be required to pay impact fees for wastewater, water system, water service and meter, storm drain, traffic (City and County), growth capital, public art, and General Plan maintenance connection and/or impact fees. When completed, the two commercial lots will generate property taxes to the City.

COMMITTEE OUTCOME
This project did not originate in one of the City Council Committees and this is a public hearing for a project application that was considered by the Planning Commission. On February 17, 2022, the Planning Commission took action and adopted Resolution No. 2022-15 recommending that the City Council approve Planning and Zoning Permit No. 20-300- 04 (Tentative Parcel Map), subject to certain findings and conditions.

Prepared by: Jay Dobrowalski, Joe Pearson II, AICP, Principal Planner

ATTACHMENTS

1. Maps (Vicinity, General Plan, Zoning, Aerial)

2. Tentative Parcel Map

3. PC Staff Report 2.17.22 (no attachments)

4. PC Resolution 2022-15

5. Ives Ave Map Notice of Exemption

6. Ives Ave Map Draft Resolution

7. Ives Ave Map Presentation
464
PZ 21-500-06

FIFTH ST
H ST
C ST

VENTURA RD

OXNARD BLVD

RICE AVE

HUENEME RD
J ST

GONZALES RD

VINEYARD AVE

WOOLEY RD

BARD RD
101 FRWY

SAVIERS RD

DORIS AVE

CENTRAL AVE

ROSE AVE

CASPER RD

THIRD ST
23RD AVE

CAMINO DEL SOL
D ST

BRISTOL RD

ARNOLD RD

NINTH ST

OLIVAS PARK DR

WEST RD

NAUMAN RD

TEAL CLUB RD

PERIMETER RD

HARBOR BLVD

MARKET ST
G ST

OCEAN DR
TRACK 13 RD
B ST

OLDS RD
32ND AVE

YUCCA ST

DEL NORTE BLVD

PATTERSON RD

CHANNEL ISLANDS BLVD

VICTORIA AVE
ELM ST

PERKINS RD

ETTING RD
F ST

PACIFIC AVE
5TH PL

PALMA DR
6TH ST

SANTA CLARA AVE
N ST

ENTRADA DR

CLARA ST

WALKER ST

SAKIOKA DR

WALNUT DR

BALBOA ST

DUNKIRK DR

SIMON WAY

ORANGE DR

STROUBE ST
5TH ST

JOLIET PL
ALLEY

EBONY DR

KENTIA ST

HILL ST
I ST

SAN JUAN AVE

PATRICIA ST
A ST

VENTURA BLVD

EASTMAN AVE
TRACK 14 RD

REDWOOD ST

GISLER AVE

FIR AVE M ST

TERESA ST

PENINSULA RD

OFFSHORE ST

AZALEA ST

VICTORIA AV
11TH AVE

WILLIAMS DR

HARBOR SERVICE BLVD

DONLON ST

APPLE LN
LEI DR

OLIVE ST

LATIGO AVE

ARCTURUS AVE
K ST

BUTLER RD

ALBION DR

SURFSIDE DR

SWAN ST

NINA DR

ALBANY DR

STURGIS RD

MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE
E ST

SAN MATEO PL

LAMBERT ST

SIKORSKY ST

JANETWOOD DR
ASH ST
DOCK 1

JOAN WAY BEAUMONT AVE

PAVIN DR

NELSON PL

OXFORD DR

HOLLY AVE

VENICE RD

MANDALAY BEACH RD

AVILA PL

BLANCA PL

VIEWPOINT DR

CAMINO AVE

BAYVIEW DR

ELBA ST

SCOTT ST

OCEAN DR
B ST
M ST
ALLEY

ROSE AVE
ALLEY
101 FRWY

PATTERSON RD

VICTORIA AVE

GONZALES RD

RICE AVE
ALLEY

PACIFIC AVE

ETTING RD
F ST
C ST

HARBOR BLVD
Vicinity Map
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles
North
Pacific Ocean
N
February 1, 2022
Oxnard Planning
1:70,000
Santa Clara River
PZ 21-500-06
Location: 1600 Ives Ave
APN: 220274015, 2200274025, 2200274095
Starbucks
Vicinity Map
Attachment 1
465
CG
BRP
ILM

STATHAM BLVD

IVES AVE

OXNARD BLVD

FISKE PL

PACIFIC AVE
2030 General Plan Land Use Map
0 50 100 200
Feet
2030 General Plan Land Use Map
Februaary 1, 2022 1:1,500
Oxnard Planning
PZ 21-500-06
Location: 1600 Ives Ave
APN: 220274015, 2200274025, 2200274095
Starbucks
CG
466

STATHAM BLVD

IVES AVE

OXNARD BLVD

FISKE PL

PACIFIC AVE
BRP
C2PD
ML
MLPD
Zoning/Specific Plan Map
Zoning/Specific Plan Map
0 25 50 100 150 200
Feet
February 1, 2022 1:1,500
Oxnard Planning
C2PD
PZ 21-500-06
Location: 1600 Ives Ave
APN: 220274015, 2200274025, 2200274095
Starbucks
467

STATHAM BLVD

IVES AVE

S OXNARD BLVD

FISKE PL

PACIFIC AVE
Aerial Map
Aerial Map
February 1, 2022
Oxnard Planning
0 25 50 100 150 200
Feet
PZ 21-500-06
Location: 1600 Ives Ave
APN: 220274015, 2200274025, 2200274095
Starbucks
468
Attachment 2
469
Attachment 3
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
Attachment 4
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

OXNARD PLANNING DIVISION
214 SOUTH C STREET
OXNARD, CALIFORNIA 93030

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
Project Description: Starbucks & Fast Food Drive-Throughs & Parcel Map - Ives Avenue ; Planning and Zoning Permit Nos. 21-300-04 (Parcel Map), 21-500-06 (Special Use Permit), and 21-500-07 (Special Use Permit): The applicant requests permits to authorize the demolition of an existing 8,868 square-foot building and subdivide an existing 1.78 acre lot into two lots with new development. The proposed development includes the construction of a 983 square-foot coffee house (Starbucks) with drive-through with 14-vehicle capacity on a 0.79 acre lot, a 2,533 square-foot fast food restaurant (Fast Food) with drive-through with 9-vehicle capacity on a 0.99 acre site, and related site improvements including 72 shared parking spaces, sidewalks, patios, and landscaping.

The Project site is located at 1600 Ives Avenue (APNs: 220-0-274-015, -025, -095) within the Channel Islands Business Center (CIBC), the Commercial General, Planned Development (C-2-PD) zone district and the Commercial General (CG) General Plan land use designation. Filed by Hassan Amirsadeghi of Habitat Properties, 10717 Wilshire Boulevard, Unit 607, Los Angeles, California 90024, designated agent (the “Applicant”) on behalf of Philippine Center of Ventura County, 1600 Ives Avenue, Oxnard, California 93030 (the “Property Owner”).

Finding: The Planning Division of the Community Development Department of the City of Oxnard has reviewed the above proposed project and found it to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
☐ Ministerial Project
☒ Categorical Exemption
☐ Statutory Exemption
☐ Emergency Project
☐ Quick Disapproval [CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code of Regs. 15270] ☐ No Possibility of Significant Effect [CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code of Regs. 15061(b)(3)] Supporting Reasons: In accordance with Section 15332 (In-Fill Development) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, projects characterized as in-fill development may be found to be exempt from the requirements of CEQA. The Project consists of the demolition of an existing commercial building, subdivision of the 1.78 acre project site lot into two lots with development including a 983 square-foot coffee house (Starbucks) with drive-through with 14-vehicle capacity on a 0.79 acre lot, a 2,533 square-foot fast food restaurant (Fast Food) with drive-through with 9-vehicle capacity on a 0.99 acre site, and related site improvements including 72 shared parking spaces, sidewalks, patios, and landscaping. The new development has been designed to be consistent with the Commercial General (CG) General Plan land use designation, as well as with the Commercial General, Planned Development zone designation, and the Channel Islands Business Center development plan. The proposed development is located on a 1.78-acre site which is generally surrounded by urban uses. The Project site will be adequately served by all required utilities and public Attachment 5
492
Notice of Exemption
Project Nos. 21-300-04, 21-500-06, and 21-500-07

services. The Project site is currently developed and has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. As a result, this Project will not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, or air quality. No Exceptions to the Exemptions (Section 15300.2) apply to defeat the Exemption. Therefore, the Planning Commission has determined that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment, and the Planning Commission recommends the Planning & Environmental Services manager to file the Notice of Exemption with the Ventura County Clerk pursuant to Section 15062 of the State CEQA Guidelines within five (5) working days of passage, approval and adoption of the project. ______________________________
(Date)
_______________________________
Joe Pearson II,
Interim Planning & Environmental Services Manager
493
RESOLUTION NO. _________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD
APPROVING PLANNING AND ZONING (PZ) PERMIT NO. PZ 21-300-04) TO SUBDIVIDE A 1.78 ACRE SITE INTO TWO PARCELS (PARCEL 1 IS

0.99 ACRES, PARCEL 2 IS 0.79 ACRES) FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1600 IVES AVENUE, (APNS: 220-0-274-015, -025, -095) SUBJECT TO CERTAIN FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS. FILED BY HASSAN
AMIRSADEGHI, OF HABITAT PROPERTIES, 10717 WILSHIRE
BOULEVARD, UNIT 607, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90024,

DESIGNATED AGENT, ON BEHALF OF PHILIPPINE CENTER OF
VENTURA COUNTY, 1600 IVES AVENUE, OXNARD, CALIFORNIA 93030 (PROPERTY OWNER).

WHEREAS, the Philippine Center of Ventura County owns a 1.78 acre parcel located at 1600 Ives Avenue (APNs: 220-0-274-015, -025, -095); and
WHEREAS, Hassan Amirsadeghi (the “Applicant” and/or “Permittee” ) on behalf of the Philippine Center of Ventura County filed an entitlement application with the City of Oxnard on August 12, 2021 for a Parcel Map (PZ No. 21-300-04); and WHEREAS, on February 17, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Oxnard ( “Planning Commission” ) conducted a duly noticed public hearing and considered the Applicant’s request to approve Tentative Parcel Map (Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-300-04) to subdivide a 1.78 acre lot into two lots to allow for the development of a 983 square-foot coffee house (Starbucks) with drive-through on a 0.79 acre lot, a 2,533 square-foot fast food restaurant with drive-through on a 0.99 acre site, and related site improvements in accordance with Chapter 15 of the Oxnard City Code; and WHEREAS, said Tentative Parcel Map was referred to various public utility companies, City departments and the Development Advisory Committee for recommendations; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the 2030 General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Tentative Parcel Map, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, conforms to the City's 2030 General Plan and elements thereof; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Oxnard has considered an application for Planning and Zoning Permit Nos. 21-500-06 (Special Use Permit) and 21-500-07 (Special Use Permit); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found that the applicant agrees with the necessity of and accepts all elements, requirements, and conditions of this resolution as being a reasonable manner of preserving, protecting, providing for, and fostering the health, safety, and Attachment 6
494
Resolution No. _______
PZ 21-300-04 (Tentative Parcel Map): Starbucks and Fast Food July 28, 2022

welfare of the citizenry in general and the persons who work or visit in this subdivision in particular and recommended the City Council of the City of Oxnard (“City Council”) to approve Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-300-04 (Tentative Parcel Map); and WHEREAS, on July 28, 2022, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider Applicant’s request to approve Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-300-04 (Tentative Parcel Map), reviewed the request, and carefully reviewed the Planning Commission’s Resolution No. 2022-15, recommending approval of the Tentative Parcel Map, subject to certain findings and conditions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the 2030 General Plan, Oxnard City Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Division has completed a preliminary environmental assessment of the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined that the Project is subject to a Class 32 “Infill Development Projects” Categorical Exemption (Section 15332). Further, the project does not trigger any of the Exceptions to the Exemptions (15300.2):
(a) Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -- a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply to all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies.

The project site has a 2030 General Plan land use designation of Commercial General (CG) and a zoning designation of General Commercial, Planned Development (C-2-PD). The project site is currently developed within an existing events center, which contains an existing restaurant and events space. The project site is generally surrounded by other commercial urban development. The project site and adjacent sites do not contain any known environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern. Therefore, the project will have no impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern. (b) Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant.

The existing events center contains a restaurant and event space. The existing 495
Resolution No. _______
PZ 21-300-04 (Tentative Parcel Map): Starbucks and Fast Food July 28, 2022

building is generally surrounded by other commercial urban development. The proposed development is consistent with the development previously in operation on site. The proposed uses would potentially increase the amount of pedestrian traffic to the site; however, the project also includes site modifications which are intended to improve the site conditions for pedestrians including providing a pedestrian crosswalk and a direct pedestrian connection to the public right-of-way. As such, the proposed Project is consistent with the 2030 General Plan and Oxnard City Code and is compatible with the physical scale and character of allowable development in the project area. Any projects requiring discretionary approval would be analyzed with the General Plan and the Oxnard City Code for consistency and CEQA for any potential impacts. Therefore, the project will have no significant cumulative impact.
(c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.

The existing events center contains a restaurant and event space. The existing building is surrounded by other commercial urban development. The proposed development is consistent with the development previously in operation on site.

The proposed uses would potentially increase the amount of pedestrian traffic to the site, however the project also includes site modifications which are intended to improve the site conditions for pedestrians including providing a pedestrian crosswalk and a direct pedestrian connection to the public right-of-way. The proposed site improvements will not result in an unusual circumstance that would cause the project to have a significant effect on the environment. The Project will not alter the urban development (commercial) character of the surrounding development and the property does not contain any unusual environmental characteristics as the property will generally be surrounded on all sides by urban development. Therefore, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.
(d) Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements, which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified EIR.

The project is not located in or adjacent to a state designated scenic highway. 496
Resolution No. _______
PZ 21-300-04 (Tentative Parcel Map): Starbucks and Fast Food July 28, 2022

(e) Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site, which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.

The proposed project site is not included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code as confirmed by staff on February 17, 2022. (f) Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project, which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

The project does not contain an existing or potential landmark, point of interest, or historic resource, and it is not located within an existing, proposed, or potential Historic District. Therefore, the proposed project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the applicant agrees with the necessity of and accepts all elements, requirements, and conditions of this Resolution as being a reasonable manner of preserving, protecting, providing for, and fostering the health, safety, and welfare of the citizenry in general and the persons who work, visit or live in this subdivision in particular; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD:

SECTION 1. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented, including the City Council Staff Report and all attachments thereto, the City Council finds:

Consistent with California Government Code Section 66474, a legislative body of a city or county shall deny approval of a tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, if it makes any of the following findings:
(a) That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451.

As described in great detail in the Planning Commission (February 17, 2022) Staff Report (Sections 6 (b), 6 (c), and 6 (e) and 7), the project’s commercial uses are consistent with the General Plan land use designation and zoning. The Project as designed and conditioned meets all applicable development standards. The subdivision of land and associated improvements do not change the land use of the subject site. Therefore, the 497
Resolution No. _______
PZ 21-300-04 (Tentative Parcel Map): Starbucks and Fast Food July 28, 2022

project is in conformance with the 2030 General Plan and the elements thereof and other adopted standards.
(b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.

The design and improvements of the project will provide for development that furthers the intent of the General Plan to realize the potential of commercial improvements that increases commercial uses within the Channel Islands Business Center and is consistent with the 2030 General Plan, as discussed above in Finding 1.a. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development.

The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development because the site is relatively level and an environmental assessment of the site did not find any soil or geologic conditions that would make the site physically unsuitable for development. As the site is not subject to soil and/or geologic conditions indicating substrate instability, the site is suitable for the proposed development which is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood.
(d) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development because it is located within a developed urban area and will be served by existing adequate public utilities. The C-2 zone does not have minimum parcel size or width requirements. The proposed development is designed and conditioned to meet all applicable development standards. There are no identified physical constraints that would prohibit development of the proposed commercial project. Additionally, there are no identified physical constraints that would prohibit development of the proposed commercial project. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

The project site has been developed with an events center. Thus, the proposed project would not likely cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because no listed species are known or expected to occur at the project site and the project site is not considered to be conducive to important biological resources or their habitat. Additionally, the project site does not include any natural standing bodies of water, riparian habitat, or other sensitive natural communities.

Federally protected wetland communities are not thought or known to exist on the site and the project site is not located within a Biological Resources Area which is known or 498
Resolution No. _______
PZ 21-300-04 (Tentative Parcel Map): Starbucks and Fast Food July 28, 2022

thought to meet habitat needs for plants and animals or promote wildlife migration or movement.
(f) That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems.

The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is unlikely to cause serious public health problems as the Project includes development that is designed and conditioned to meet all applicable development standards. However, potentially hazardous materials such as fuels, lubricants, and solvents would be used during grading and construction of the proposed project, but their use and disposal would be subject to applicable standards and law so as to not create environmental or health issues. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause serious public health problems because, as indicated by Finding 1.a above, it would utilize existing adequate public utilities, namely water and sewer.
(g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. In this connection, the governing body may approve a map if it finds that alternate easements, for access or for use, will be provided, and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction and no authority is hereby granted to a legislative body to determine that the public at large has acquired easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

The design of the subdivision does not conflict with easements, acquired by the public-at-large, for access through or use of property within the subdivision because, as conditioned, no buildings would be located in the area of the existing public utilities easements, all blanket easements or other easement that are no longer needed by the City shall be abandoned, and there is no need for new or additional easement(s) for the public-at-large.

The City Council of the City of Oxnard finds that the proposed division of land complies with requirements established by the Subdivision Map Act and this chapter, including but not limited to requirements as to area, improvement and design, floodwater drainage control, appropriate improved public roads, sanitary disposal facilities, water supply availability and environmental protection.
499
Resolution No. _______
PZ 21-300-04 (Tentative Parcel Map): Starbucks and Fast Food July 28, 2022

SECTION 2. The City Council, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), determines that the Project (subdivision of a lot and construction of a commercial building) will not have a significant impact on the environment and is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15332 (Class 32) of the State CEQA Guidelines. The Project involves a request to demolish the existing building located at 1600 Ives Avenue, subdivide the existing lot into two lots with development including construction of a 983 square-foot coffee shop with a drive-through with 14-vehicle capacity, on an 0.79 acre lot and related improvements including 31 shared parking spaces, sidewalks, patios and landscaping and infrastructure improvements and administrative parking relief for shared parking with the adjacent 0.99 acre lot with 41 parking spaces. In addition to the physical improvements a Transportation Demand Management Plan will be implemented for the site to prevent vehicles from backing-up into adjacent roadways. As a result, this Project will not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, or air quality. The City Council has determined that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and no Exceptions to the Exemptions (Section 15300.2) apply to defeat the Exemption. The Planning & Environmental Services Manager is hereby authorized to file a Notice of Exemption with the Ventura County Clerk pursuant to Section 15602 of the State CEQA Guidelines within five (5) working days of passage, approval and adoption of this Resolution.

SECTION 3. Based on the findings set forth herein, the City Council hereby approves Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-300-04 (Tentative Parcel Map), subject to the attached conditions of approval.

SECTION 4. The Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The abbreviations below identify the City department or division responsible for determining compliance with these standard conditions. The first department or division listed has responsibility for compliance at plan check, the second during inspection and the third at final inspection, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, or at a later date, as specified in the condition. If more than one department or division is listed, the first will check the plans or inspect the project before the second confirms compliance with the condition. The italicized code at the end of each condition provides internal information on the source of each condition: Some are standard permit conditions (e.g. G-1) while some are taken from environmental documents (e.g. MND-S2).

DEPARTMENTS AND DIVISIONS
CA City Attorney PL Planning Division
DS Dev Services/Eng Dev/Inspectors TR Traffic Division
PD Police Department B Building Plan Checker
500
Resolution No. _______
PZ 21-300-04 (Tentative Parcel Map): Starbucks and Fast Food July 28, 2022

SC Source Control FD Fire Department
PK Landscape Design CE Code Compliance
AH Affordable Housing

GENERAL PROJECT CONDITIONS

1. This permit is granted for the property described in the application on file with the Planning Division, and may not be transferred from one property to another. (PL, G-1).

2. This permit is granted for the plans dated February 17, 2022, (“the plans”) on file with the Planning Division. The project shall conform to the plans, except as otherwise specified in these conditions, or unless a minor modification to the plans is approved by the Planning and Environmental Services Manager (“Planning Manager”) or a major modification to the plans is approved by the Planning Commission. A minor modification may be granted for minimal changes or increases in the extent of use or size of structures or of the design, materials or colors of structures or masonry walls. A major modification shall be required for substantial changes or increases in such items. (PL, G-2).

3. All required off-site and on-site improvements for the project, including structures, paving, and landscaping, shall be completed prior to occupancy unless the Development Services Manager allows Developer to provide security or an executed agreement approved by the City Attorney to ensure completion of such improvements. (DS, G-4)

4. By commencing any activity related to the project or using any structure authorized by this permit, Developer accepts all of the conditions and obligations imposed by this permit and waives any challenge to the validity of the conditions and obligations stated therein. (CA, G-5).

5. Developer agrees, as a condition of adoption of this resolution, at Developer’s own expense, to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from and against any claim, action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul the approval of the resolution or any condition attached thereto or any proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done or made prior to the approval of such resolution that were part of the approval process. (CA, G-6)

6. Any covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) applicable to the project property shall be consistent with the terms of this permit and the City Code. If there is a conflict between the CC&Rs and the City Code or this permit, the City Code or this permit shall prevail. (CA, G-7).
501
Resolution No. _______
PZ 21-300-04 (Tentative Parcel Map): Starbucks and Fast Food July 28, 2022

7. Developer shall complete the “Notice of Land Use Restrictions and Conditions” form, using the form provided by the City, for recording with the Ventura County Recorder.

Before the City issues building permits, Developer shall submit the original completed, signed and notarized document, together with the required fees to the Planning Manager. (PL, G-8)

8. If Developer, owner or tenant fails to comply with any of the conditions of this permit, the Developer, owner or tenant shall be subject to a civil fine pursuant to the City Code. (CA, G-14).

PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS

9. Before the City issues building permits, Developer shall include a reproduction of all conditions of this permit as adopted by resolution of the Planning Commission and/or the City Council in all sets of construction documents and specifications for the project. (PL, PL-3)

10. Approved tentative map for a Parcel Map shall expire thirty-six (36) months after its approval if a Certificate of Approval for the Parcel Map is not recorded with the Ventura County Recorder’s Office. (PL)

11. All existing reciprocal access and parking agreements for the site with adjacent sites will remain in full force and effect and shall apply to Parcels A and B created by this Parcel Map. Said easements can only be vacated with the consent of all parties to include the City of Oxnard as the regulating authority. The easements cannot be vacated until alternatives are devised and approved by the City to accommodate parking and circulation on adjacent sites.

12. Prior to City’s issuance of the Certificate of Approval for Parcel Map, Subdivider shall provide proof of recordation of a reciprocal access and parking agreement that is acceptable to the City Attorney’s office for the proposed site affected by the newly created Parcels A & B. (PL)

13. Subdivider shall establish a property owner’s association and the association shall be responsible for the maintenance of parking, landscaping, lighting and other common areas and facilities held in common by the association and for the enforcement of CC&Rs related to property maintenance.

14. Subdivider shall submit to Planning staff an application and exhibits required for the Certificate of Approval of Parcel Map. Planning staff shall prepare the Certificate of Approval for Parcel Map, and the Subdivider shall record the Certificate of Approval for Parcel Map with the Ventura County Recorder’s Office. (PL) 502
Resolution No. _______
PZ 21-300-04 (Tentative Parcel Map): Starbucks and Fast Food July 28, 2022

15. These conditions of approval impose specific fees, dedications, reservations and/or other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, the 90-day period in which the Developer or applicant has to protest the imposed fees, dedications, reservations and/or other exactions has begun as of the date that the conditions of approval are approved.

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONDITIONS

16. Developer shall pay plan check and processing fees in effect at the time of construction plan submittal and shall pay development fees, encroachment permit fees, and other applicable fees in effect at permit issuance. (DS-1)

17. Developer shall enter into an agreement, approved as to form by the City Attorney, to install and construct all public improvements required by this permit and by the City Code. Developer shall post security satisfactory to the Finance Director, guaranteeing the installation and construction of all required improvements within the time period specified in the agreement or any approved time extension. (DS-14)

18. Developer agrees, as a condition of approval of this resolution, to indemnify, defend and hold harmless, at Developer’s expense, City and its agents, officers and employees from and against any claim, action or proceeding commenced within the time period provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37, to attack, review, set aside, void or annul the approval of this resolution or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. City shall promptly notify Developer of any such claim, action or proceeding of which City receives notice, and City will cooperate fully with Developer in the defense thereof. Developer shall reimburse City for any court costs and attorney's fees that City may be required to pay as a result of any such claim, action or proceeding.

City may, in its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding, but such participation shall not relieve Developer of the obligations of this condition. Developer’s acceptance of this resolution or commencement of construction or operations under this resolution shall be deemed to be acceptance of all conditions thereof. (DS-18)

19. Developer shall provide all necessary easements for streets, highways, alleys, sidewalks, parkways, landscaping, utilities, drainage facilities, or other improvements as required by City. If such easements cannot be obtained from the property owner by negotiation, City may acquire them at the expense of Developer by exercise of the power of eminent domain. Developer shall bear all costs of eminent domain proceedings, including appraisal, acquisition, attorney’s fees, and court costs. Before City issues a site improvement permit, Developer shall dedicate all required easements to City. (DS-19) 503
Resolution No. _______
PZ 21-300-04 (Tentative Parcel Map): Starbucks and Fast Food July 28, 2022

20. Prior to approval of the final map or parcel map, Developer shall provide the City Engineer with written evidence from the Ventura County Clerk's Office that Developer has executed and filed with the Clerk all certificates, statements and securities required by Government Code Sections 66492 and 66493. (DS-26)

21. Prior to release of the final map or parcel map for recordation, Developer shall provide the City Engineer with a 100‑scale base map for addressing purposes. The map shall be drawn on 18‑inch by 24‑inch mylar and shall show the standard address map title block, north arrow, street names, tract number, phase boundary and lot numbers. The City will assign all addresses. (DS-56)

22. Prior to release of the final map or parcel map for recordation, Developer shall post security satisfactory to the City Attorney guaranteeing that all survey monuments will be set as required by the Government Code and the City Code. (DS-57)

23. Developer shall process the Parcel Map PZ 21-300-04 associated with this permit concurrent with the site improvement plans for Planning and Zoning Permit Nos 21-500-06 and 21-500-07. The Parcel Map shall be processed for recordation concurrent with the approval of the PZs 21-500-06 and 21-500-07 site improvement plans. (DS)

24. The Parcel Map shall indicate the vacation of existing City easements that are determined by the City Engineer to no longer be necessary. The vacation(s) shall be processed under section 66445(j) of the Subdivision Map Act. If easement vacations are required to be processed separately from the Parcel Map, Developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the vacation including, but not limited to, fees associated with the hearing(s), easement vacation document preparation, and review by the City. (DS)

25. Developer shall review and demonstrate to the City Engineer that the emergency access easement granted in favor of Pai Lu Tsai & Yu-Or Mu Tsai for Lot 40 of Tract 4065-1, recorded as Instrument No. 88-128954, is no longer needed for its intended use. Prior to the recording of the Parcel Map, Developer shall provide proof to the City Engineer that the existing emergency easement has been quitclaimed. (DS)

26. Developer shall provide to the City of Oxnard additional easement(s) for the sidewalk and curb ramp at the new driveway entry and the onsite water system. The new easements shall be shown on the Parcel Map, subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. (DS)

27. Developer shall identify the existing and proposed public drainage facilities along South Oxnard Boulevard and ensure that they stay within the public right of way. Alternatively, a drainage easement may be approved by the City Engineer if it is determined that no practical alternative exists. (DS)
504
Resolution No. _______
PZ 21-300-04 (Tentative Parcel Map): Starbucks and Fast Food July 28, 2022

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Oxnard, State of California, held on the 28th day of July, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

RECUSED:
_____________________________
John C. Zaragoza, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________ ___________________________ Rose Chaparro, City Clerk Stephen M. Fischer, City Attorney 505
Ives Avenue Parcel Map
Planning & Zoning Permit No. 21-300-04 (Parcel Map)
1 City Council
July 28, 2022
1600 Ives Avenue
Applicant: Hassan Amirsadeghi, Habitat Properties
Jay Dobrowalski, Senior Planner
Joe Pearson II, Interim Planning & Environmental Services Manager Vyto Adomaitis, Director of Community Development
Project Description
• A request for the approval of the subdivision of a existing 1.78 acre lot into two lots (PZ 21-300-04 - Parcel Map).
• Create two lots for development:
– 0.79 acre lot with coffee shop (Starbucks)
– 0.99 acre lot with fast food restaurant
• Reciprocal access and parking
2 506
Project Location 3
Subject Site: 1600 Ives Avenue
Existing Events Center
Surrounding Land Uses
SITE
N
4 COMMERCIAL

FAST FOOD

DISTRIBUTION

MEDICAL CLINIC
(IN CONSTRUCTION)
VACANT

OXNARD BLVD

STATHAM BLVD

IVES PLACE
507
General Plan and Zoning
SITE
N
5 SITE
N
2030 General Plan:

Commercial General (CG)
Zoning Designation:

General Commercial, Planned
Development (C-2-PD)
Planning Commission Background 6
• February 17, 2022: Planning Commission approved Special Use Permits for a new Starbucks and Fast Food development. These actions allowed for:

1. PZ 21-500-06 - Special Use Permit - Starbucks
• Construct a new 983 square-foot coffee shop and outdoor patio • Drive-through with 14-vehicle capacity
• Parking lot for 25 vehicles
• Landscaping and infrastructure improvements

2. PZ 21-500-07 - Special Use Permit - Fast Food
• Construct a new 2,533 square-foot restaurant and outdoor patio • Drive-through with 9-vehicle capacity
• Parking lot for 32 vehicles
• Landscaping and infrastructure improvements
• The Planning Commission also recommended the City Council approval the Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the existing lot.
508
Proposed Site Plan (Parcel Map) 7
Proposed Parcel Map:

Creates two lots
Reciprocal Access and Parking
PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2
NORTH
Policy, Code Consistency & CEQA
Project found to be consistent with:
• General Plan
• C-2-PD Development Standards & Parking
• Channel Islands Business Center Guidelines
• CEQA
○ Notice of Exemption will be filled
8 509
Select Recommended Conditions of Approval
● Construction of off-site and on-site improvements (COA #3) ● The Project’s permit are granted for 36 months (COA #10) ● Reciprocal access and parking agreement required (COA #12) ● Establishment of Property Owner’s Association for maintenance (COA #13) ● Vacation of existing easements (COA #25)
● Provide easements for sidewalk, curb, and on-site water (COA #26) 9 Public Notice
• Notice of PC hearing was provided:
• Newspaper,
• On-site posting; and
• Mailed to property owners within 300 feet.
• To date, no public comment has been submitted regarding the project. 10 510
Staff Recommendation
That the City Council:
1) Conduct a public hearing;
2) Find the Project to be Categorically Exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15332 (Infill Development); and
3) Adopt a Resolution approving Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-300-04 (Parcel Map), for a tentative parcel map, subject to certain findings and conditions. 11 End of Presentation
12 511

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

REPORTS
AGENDA ITEM NO. M.1
DATE: July 28, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Phillip Molina, City Treasurer, (805) 385-7808, [email protected] SUBJECT: City Treasurer’s Monthly Investment Report for the Period Ending June 30, 2022. (0/5/5)

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council receive and file the report.

Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video: https://youtu.be/h5xi2ity6QU

BACKGROUND
The City of Oxnard’s June 2022 investment report will be brief this reporting period and is required to be submitted to the City Clerk and the City Council as prescribed in California Government Code 41004.

But first, I wish to give a special thanks to the City staff without whose assistance this report could not be generated. This report does not show the fund balances, nor disbursements, nor total receipts of the City of Oxnard, because Oxnard Municipal Code identifies the Oxnard Finance Department is charged with producing that information. This report does reflect the monthly investment information in the similar format that has been presented in previous months, along with the amounts in the Bank statements as of June 30, 2022. The following data is included in this report.

For the month of June, the investment portfolio earned an estimated $369,385 including LAIF and the Ventura County Investment Pool.

Not in this sequence, it is our intention to show the public, the Mayor, and City Council the amounts in each city bank account so that you can see the percentage of available cash to the amount actually invested. You will notice the large buildup of cash in the bank account for the city’s general business. This is the result of the anticipated Federal payments, and it is the intent of the Treasurer to greatly increase the amount of cash invested so that once again it exceeds 90%. For June we have exceeded our goal.

Next, we will show you in a bar chart the amounts invested separated by their maturity date or year. This will allow you to see the ladder or spread of the investments in order to generate a higher return. Third, we explain that the cash flows over the last 15 months, so you can judge the management of the cash and determine whether there are periods during the year when more money is available for a short period, overnight investments versus 2-, 3-, 4-, or 5-year maturities.

Fourth, we will show you the daily cash position for June 30, 2022, so that you can see how the Treasurer’s department reviews our cash balances every day to assure that the city has enough liquidity to cover its obligations.

And next, we make available the detailed list of every investment that the city currently holds as of the last day of June 30, 2022, upon request.

This information is being provided to you using both charts and graphs. The charts are presented so that the Mayor, 512
Council, and the public can begin to see the actual amounts in the city’s bank accounts at Bank of America. The graphs are created in order to show trends and relationships that are best understood in that method of presentation. So, while this report is brief in the number of pages, we hope to respond to any questions you may have.

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item is a routine operational item or does not relate to the five strategic priorities adopted by City Council on March 16, 2021.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City’s total amount invested as of June 30, 2022 at estimated market value was $365,476,253 purchased at a tax cost of $381,417,932. Because the upward movement in the GSE market interest rates produces greater earnings, it also results in an estimated net market loss if we had to sell the older lower yielding instruments in the market today.

In a market (the city’s policy requires risk-free rate of return) of fixed interest rates any instrument purchased today will decrease in value as the interest rates increases and vice versa. However, with a passive portfolio, one where we intend to hold each instrument until it matures, we can expect to receive the PAR or Face value when we sell back each individual GSE (government-sponsored enterprise bond) or CD so that there would be no market loss.

ITEM June 2022
Cost of investments (bank
calc.) $381,417,932.50
Par or face value $381,310,000.00
USBank’s tax costs and PAR/Face Value
Cash balances on the 30th day of June 2022 in each authorized city bank account with Bank of America totaled $60,616,333.04 in the four Bank of America accounts.

City Treasurer's bank accounts June 2022
City's General Fund bank account $52,821,236.19
Successor Agency bank account $7,611,703.51
W/C (workers compensation)
account $40,124.64
Parking Citations updated $143,268.70

TOTAL CASH IN BANK
ACCOUNTS $60,616,333.04
Less UAL pmt due $25,436,601.00
unencumbered cash $35,179,732.04
(Per Bank Statements as of June 30, 2022)
The investments have a par value of $381,310,000. Some were purchased months or years earlier and during the period of controlled GSE interest rates set by the former President. To provide greater return we can try to reduce the amount invested with LAIF and spread that over the 2,3,4, and 5- year terms. Recently, LAIF was generating an average return that is now moving upward with the City’s average portfolio return. LAIF’s June average apportionment rate was 1.06%, which is less than the current GSE (government-sponsored enterprise) rates and less than our average portfolio yield.

Reducing the amount in LAIF would produce greater returns, however, doing so would also reduce the liquidity of the portfolio.

ITEM June 2022
513
Cost of investments (bank
calc.) $381,417,932.50
Par or face value $381,310,000.00
USBank est Market value $365,476,253.35
Estimated market value
The major portfolio’s average current earning has a yield on a 365-day basis of 1.30% year to date. So based on the face value of the investments using the average portfolio yield for estimating the amount of interest earnings for the month of June and an estimated annual interest earnings over $4.4 million:
total est monthly earnings $369,685.83
City's investment rate 1.30%
total est annual earnings $4,436,230.00
Estimated annual and monthly earnings
Now when we look back at the monthly cash flows of the recent years, we found that the month with the highest cash outflow was in 2018 with a one-month outflow of $37.4 million. And the fact that we had $75 million invested in LAIF and $31 million in the Ventura County Investment Pool, which can be drawn down within one day, means there should be no normal condition that would require the Treasurer to sell investments before their maturity. Before we reveal the details, we want to know the level of efficiency in our investment team. But first we look to see how much cash is available, how much cash is invested to determine the efficiency of the team. The goal is to invest 100% of available cash, and we know that for normal operations we should retain a daily balance of $3-5 million in the bank accounts.

June 2022
amount invested @ tax
cost $381,417,932.50
total available cash to
invest $408,985,961.03
percent invested =
efficiency 93%
Efficiency rating
The daily cash report for the last working day in June shows sufficient available cash to satisfy the city’s booked shortterm obligations and the UAL payment due.

Date: Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 4:05 PM
Subject: Daily cash report for 6/30/2022
To: Eden and Martha,
I reviewed the daily cash report showing $52,008,502.47 in the General Bank Account, $7,611,703.51 in the CDC account and a UAL payment due totaling ($25,436,601.00).

DAILY CASH POSITION WORKSHEET - GENERAL ACCOUNT
DATE: 06/30/22
.

CREDIT ESTIMATE DESCRIPTION
Collected/Closing Avail Bal 52,993,319.48 As of 06/29/22 514
1 Day Float 256,263.82 As of 06/29/22
Credit Cards-C2G/OTC 103,190.50
Auto Pay 72,291.40
LAIF Withdrawal
Investment Coupon 15,156.25
Other 29,154.39 Co. of Vta
Other
TOTAL CREDITS $ 53,469,375.84

DEBIT ESTIMATE
Accounts Payable to Clear 300,000.00
Investment Purchase 1,000,000.00 3134GXA61 4% FHLMC
Other 122.71 VOYA
Other 160,750.66 AIMS
TOTAL DEBITS $ 1,460,873.37
GENERAL ACCOUNT BALANCE $ 52,008,502.47
SUCCESSOR AGENCY $ 7,611,703.51
LAIF $ 75,000,000.00
VCIP $ 31,000,000.00
* Pending Payments:

UAL $ (25,436,601.00)
The bar chart below, shows the maturities of City’s investment portfolio and reflects the fact that as our older instruments are being called early, we find the need to acquire shorter term notes but not unless we can guarantee a rate of .19 % or higher as explained above.
515
Detail of investments available upon request.

COMMITTEE OUTCOME
This item did not originate in Committee.

Prepared by: Phillip Molina, City Treasurer

ATTACHMENTS
None
516

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

REPORTS
AGENDA ITEM NO. M.2
DATE: July 28, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Steve Naveau, Human Resources Director, (805) 385-7947, [email protected] SUBJECT: Memoranda of Understanding - Employee Bargaining Units. (0/10/5)

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council of the City of Oxnard adopt the following Resolutions:

1. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Oxnard approving the successor Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Oxnard and the International Union of Operating Engineers and authorizing the City Manager or designee to take the necessary administrative actions to implement the agreement,

2. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Oxnard approving the successor Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Oxnard and the Service Employees International Union and authorizing the City Manager or designee to take the necessary administrative actions to implement the agreement,

3. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Oxnard approving the successor Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Oxnard and the Oxnard Peace Officers Association and authorizing the City Manager or designee to take the necessary administrative actions to implement the agreement,

4. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Oxnard approving the benefits for the Executive and Unrepresented employees and authorizing the City Manager or designee to take the necessary administrative actions to implement the Resolution,

5. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Oxnard amending Resolution number 15,594 authorizing and approving the classification and salary schedule pursuant to Chapter 4 of the City Personnel Rules and Regulations, and

6. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Oxnard amending Resolution number 15,593 authorizing full time equivalent positions pursuant to Chapter 4 of the City Personnel Rules and Regulations.

Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video: https://youtu.be/uRNXuzyY270

BACKGROUND
The attached resolutions contain the new terms and conditions of employment with the following bargaining units:
 The International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) represents approximately 400 employees who perform work primarily in the field and utilities.
 The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) represents over 300 employees in the City who perform primarily administrative support work.
 The Oxnard Peace Officers Association (OPOA) represents approximately 230 sworn public safety and nonsafety employees in the Police Department.  The Executive and Unrepresented group, which includes approximately 20 employees including the City Manager, City Attorney, department directors, three assistant directors, and attorneys in the City Attorney’s Office.
517
The negotiations took place over the last five months, the results of which included changes the City was asking to make in the health benefit, the implementation of the class and compensation study, cost of living adjustments and some miscellaneous terms that are pertinent to the individual bargaining units. The City has three more bargaining units--the Oxnard Mid-Managers Association (OMMA), the International Association of Firefighters (IAFF) and the Oxnard Public Safety Managers Association (OPSMA) with which the City is still negotiating new MOUs.

DISCUSSION
The following provides a more detailed explanation of the changes that the bargaining units and the City have tentatively agreed to pending Council approval.

Health Benefit
In the most recent 2018 bargaining unit contracts, the City took the step to increase the City’s contribution towards medical coverage. Prior to this change, it had been over ten years since the City had last made a change in this benefit, which left it severely lagging in the marketplace. The changes being recommended include an increase in the City’s contribution of 15% in the first year and 5% for each subsequent year in each year of the contracts, with the intent of providing a sufficient increase to cover a family plan in at least one medical plan option. These increases will help maintain a competitive position in the marketplace.

Currently, employees may receive cash payments related to their medical benefit in one of two ways: waive or cash back.

The “waive” occurs when employees who are enrolled in medical coverage outside of the City can, with proof of credible coverage, receive the City contribution rather than the health benefit from the City. “Cash back” occurs when an employee enrolls in a medical plan with a premium less than the City contribution and then receives the excess contribution as cash.

Although the City is proposing to make increases in the contribution, it is decreasing cash back and waive amounts. To implement these changes, the City will create a two level system in medical contributions which is intended to slowly wean employees off of the waive and cash back payments. New employees or employees who make changes in their medical plans will immediately move to the plan level that does not have any “cash back” payments and reduces the “waive” payment from $1,243 ($900 for OPOA) to $500. By reducing the payments employees receive from the “waive” and eliminating the “cash back,” the City is able to repurpose this money back into the plan, which offsets the City increasing its contribution towards the plan premiums. Also, this more clearly aligns with the purpose of the City providing affordable health care rather than unintended supplemental cash payments to City employees.

Classification and Compensation Study (non-safety unions) Over six years ago, the City had an audit completed on the internal service departments, which led to over 100+ recommendations intended to move the internal departments to be capable of providing higher-quality services to the operating departments. One of these recommendations for the Human Resource Department was to implement a classification and compensation study.

The last time such a study was conducted was over 25 years ago. As a general rule, agencies want these studies to be done approximately every ten years. This study looked at the City’s classification structure as well as the competitiveness of its salary structure. The results of the study included a broad classification system, which is helpful for employee career development by providing a career track progression, while at the same time making it easier for management to understand and administer the classification structure. Through the study, the City is also able to ensure that employees are paid based on both internal equity, meaning the value the job holds across the organization, and external market forces in the labor market.

Rather than immediately increasing employees’ salaries to the new range, the employee bargaining units agreed to the new classification ranges applying over time. As employees receive their cost of living adjustments (described below) and five percent annual increases, their salaries will come into the new ranges. For some employees below the new range, it may take until the end of the proposed contract term to reach the new range. Under the terms of the various MOUs, employees in the IUOE bargaining group will all be brought into the salary range by the end of the contract in June 2025, by the amount that it takes to move the employee into his or her individual range. For SEIU, employees will be provided this adjustment in January 2024. This approach reduced the immediate financial impact to the City and, with the 518
exception of the Executive and Unrepresented group, allowed for cost of living adjustments for employees.

Cost of Living Adjustment
Non-Safety Bargaining Units
The City and the non-safety bargaining units have agreed to a 3% salary adjustment per year, also known as a cost of living adjustment (COLA) to all employees in the IUOE, and SEIU bargaining units. It has been over seven years since employees’ salary ranges have received COLA adjustments due to the condition of the City’s finances. This has hindered the ability to recruit new talent to the organization, as a COLA is a standard component of public sector employee contracts and in a survey of the public agencies in Ventura County, including the County itself, there is a range of COLAs up to 4%. The City believes that a 3% COLA is appropriate and timely given the economic climate. Though the salary ranges for the unrepresented executive group will increase by 3% per year, employees in this group are not automatically eligible to receive this 3% COLA increase.

OPOA Bargaining Unit
For the three-year OPOA MOU with a term commencing July 1, 2021, the City and OPOA have agreed to a 0% COLA in FY 21-22, and a 5% COLA in both FY 22-23 and FY 23-24. This equates to an average COLA over the term of the OPOA MOU of 3.33% per year.

Other Miscellaneous Economic Terms
IUOE
Standby Pay – Currently employees in this bargaining unit receive $2 per hour to be available to return to work within 45 – 60 minutes of receiving a call. Typically this is used on 24 hour operations or over weekends. The new contract with IUOE increases the standby rate to $3 per hour.

Tool Allowance – As is common practice in this career field, fleet services equipment mechanics and fleet service maintenance workers purchase most of their tools that are used in their day-to-day work. The City is increasing the tool allowance for these employees by $75 in each year of the contract up to a total of $1,025 per year in the final year of the contract.

Vacation – The change on the vacation schedule is to match the schedule in the SEIU contract. This change amounts to a total accrual increase of 8 hours annually per employee (0.31 hours/pay period), with a direct offset of the elimination of a floating holiday for employees in IUOE.

Executive Resolution
Severance Pay – Severance pay is the compensation the City provides to an employee after employment is over in exchange for the employee waiving any opportunity to sue and seek damages. When warranted, the City has provided a severance offer to executives when they are asked to leave the agency without breaking law or policy. This practice is very common in both the public and private sectors. The language in the Resolution allows for the City Manager, with the concurrence of the City Attorney, to make this offer up to $75,000 (but not to the City Manager or City Attorney), which is the same dollar amount that Council has delegated for administrative approval to settle lawsuits and compromise claims against the City.

Moving Expense Reimbursement - Over the last couple of years while recruiting for executive staff, staff have been asked by potential candidates if the City offers a moving expense reimbursement. The City does not offer this and has had some of these candidates back out of the interview process in favor of other agencies that do offer this benefit. This has become more of a standard benefit that agencies are offering to entice candidates from other areas of the state and other parts of the country to come to their agency. It is important that Oxnard stay competitive in hiring. The benefit that is proposed is a reimbursement and the actual amount would be set when the position is offered to the candidate, up to a maximum of $10,000.

Establishment of a Retiree Health Savings Plan (RHS) – The executive and unrepresented staff will eliminate the $500 per year wellness benefit in exchange for the City making a 1% contribution towards an RHS plan. The RHS plan will provide funds to employees to use in retirement for health-related costs.

OPOA
519
Roll-up of percentage-based add-pay - In order to simplify administration of payroll and to increase transparency in how the City compensates its police officers, the City and OPOA agreed to eliminate certain percentage-based add-pays and instead “roll up” these add-pays into the salary ranges. This creates a more attractive salary band to assist with recruitment, while greatly simplifying the payroll administration process. The maximum in these percentage-based addpays that any OPOA member can have at any one time is 22%. The add-pays being eliminated and rolled into the salary range are as follows:
 Detective Pay (5% of salary)
 Longevity Pay (up to 7% of salary)
 Educational Pay (up to 10% of salary)
 Night Differential Pay (5% of salary)
(The total does not add up to 22% because detective pay and night differential pay are exclusive of one another.) One-Time Cash Payments - In order to settle existing and potential litigation, the City has agreed to pay all members of OPOA a one-time cash payment of $4,000 each. This one-time payment would occur in August 2022. A reserve for the existing litigation has already been established in the General Fund.

Adjustment to Public Safety Dispatcher Ranges - In order to assist with recruitment and retention, City staff is proposing an increase to the ranges for the Public Safety Dispatcher position. This will make the City’s salary range competitive with other local agencies, including the County of Ventura.

Tuition Reimbursement - With the removal of the add-pay for educational pay, a $1,000 per employee annual tuition reimbursement plan will be included in the MOU. This tuition reimbursement plan would assist unit employees in furthering their education to further career growth in the City.

Fiscal Impact
The total estimated cost of this package for IUOE, OPOA, SEIU, and Executives for the upcoming 3-year period is $12,738,520 (the first year of the OPOA agreement is FY 21-22 and there is zero cost for this first year for OPOA). This amounts to approximately 11.45% of total compensation, or 3.82% per year. Of this total amount, the impact to the City’s General Fund totals $7,562,868 over the 3-year term, as a portion of IUOE and SEIU are funded from sources other than the General Fund (for example, the utility funds and internal service fee funds).

The estimated cost per major fund is:

Description Fund FY 2022-23 Total 3-
Years
General Fund 101 $3,949,013 $8,087,342
Measure O 104 $211,461 $264,398
Water 601,608 $247,016 $642,483
Wastewater 611,621 $268,484 $698,324
Environmental Resources 631 $593,181 $1,542,853
Internal Service Funds 701,702,725,731,735,741$275,931 $717,693 Other Funds $386,401 $785,427
Estimated Total $5,931,487 $12,738,520
Labor Costing Methodology vs. Budget Methodology
As staff has shown in prior MOU-related agenda reports, the financial impact may be depicted in two ways. One is a year over year cost increase, which is what is used predominantly in the labor relations field. There are jurisdictions within Ventura County that depict their employee costs in this manner. This methodology shows what the increased cost is as compared with the previous year. Using this methodology, the impact in Year 1 will be $5,931,487, the impact in Year 2 will be an additional $4,492,517, and the impact in Year 3 will be a further $2,314,516, for a total impact of $12,738,520, as shown in the chart below.
520
The other methodology is more common for budget and finance professionals, who compare all of the financial costs of that contract to the year before the contract becomes effective (Base Year). This methodology compounds the increased costs over the term of the entire contract. In the case of the resolution presented here, this would be comparing the increase in costs in Year 1 to the budgeted cost of the group in the Base Year, the increase in costs in Year 2 to the budgeted cost of the group still in the Base Year, and the increase in costs in Year 3 to the budgeted cost of the group once again in the Base Year. Using this methodology, the budget impact in Year 1 will be $5,931,487, the impact in Year 2 will be $10,424,004, and the impact in Year 3 will be $12,738,520, for a total, cumulative 3-year impact of $29,094,012, as shown in the chart below.

As seen in this chart, the dollar costs look different under the two different concepts; however, the cumulative percentage increase is the same.

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item is a routine operational item or does not relate to the five strategic priorities adopted by City Council on March 16, 2021.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Staff estimates that for each fund and department impacted by the tentatively-agreed MOUs, the City’s FY 2022-23 adopted budget has sufficient appropriations. Once bargaining units still actively negotiating (IAFF, OMMA, and OPSMA) reach tentative agreements, additional appropriations may be needed.

COMMITTEE OUTCOME
This item did not originate in Committee.

Prepared by: Steve Naveau, Human Resources Director

ATTACHMENTS

1. Attachment No 1 - IUOE Resolution

2. Attachment No 2 - SEIU Resolution

3. Attachment No 3 - OPOA Resolution

4. Attachment No 4 - Executive and Unrepresented Resolution

5. Attachment No 5 - Salary Schedule Resolution
521

6. Attachment No 6- Position Control Resolution

7. City Council 72822 Item M3 MOU Employee Bargaining Units 522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
1 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD

ESTABLISHING RULES FOR THE APPLICATION OF COMPENSATION RATES AND

BENEFIT LEVELS FOR EXECUTIVE AND NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Oxnard, as follows:

Section I. Applicability
A. General. Employees subject to this Resolution are classified as either Executive or unrepresented.

The listing in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference provides a list of classifications with the category they are assigned.

Section II. Salaries
A. The following salary increases are provided:

Employees in classifications designated as executive or unrepresented will be paid in accordance with the hourly rate established in the annual classification and salary resolution.

During the term of this Resolution, the salary ranges for all classifications listed in Exhibit A shall increase by 3%. Employees in unrepresented classifications shall receive a 3% COLA in the first pay period of August 2022, First full pay period of July 2023, and the first full pay period in July 2024.

B. Annual Increases
i. Based on City Manager review, every year department heads are eligible for a minimum 3% increase in their salary which is effective the first full pay period of January. Unrepresented classifications in this Resolution are eligible for a 5% increase in their salary which is effective the first full pay period of January. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no employee shall be able to receive an increase in excess of the salary range established or their classification.

When the City Manager determines that an employee has demonstrated an exceptional level of job performance and efficiency, the City Manager may grant a merit increase in excess of three percent (3.0%). No merit increase shall cause an employee's salary to exceed the top of the salary matrix established for the classification.
ii. Eligible employees will receive their annual increase effective the first full pay period of January. Newly hired employees or employees promoted during the preceding calendar year will have their merit increase pro-rated based on their service during the calendar year.

C. Automobile Allowance
i. Executive Employees will be provided a biweekly automobile allowance as follows:
551
2 1. Assistant City Manager $184.62

2. Department Heads / Deputy City Manager $161.54
ii. Eligible employees who receive approval to use a City vehicle instead of receiving an automobile allowance shall have computations of other benefits/compensation calculated as if they received an allowance.
iii. Mileage reimbursement for local in County travel will not be reimbursed if the employee receives a car allowance. Mileage reimbursement shall be approved for out of area business travel at a rate equivalent to the standard mileage rate established by proclamation of the Internal Revenue Service.

Section III. Other Compensation Provisions
A. Mileage for Travel Outside City Limits
i. When employees are required by City to use their personal vehicle to perform their assigned duties for City, and they so utilize their own vehicles in traveling directly and uninterruptedly from one assigned work location to another assigned work location, at least one of which is located outside of the City limits, City shall provide mileage reimbursement. Employees shall make claims for mileage compensation that are consistent with current IRS rates on City designated forms.

B. Fire Chief Mutual Aid Response
The Fire Chief, with approval of the City Manager, when assigned to, in support of, or pre-positioned for, any mutual aid incident, will be compensated portal to portal at their regular rate of pay for hours worked outside of their regular work hours.

Section IV. Holidays
A. Observed holidays include:

New Year's Day (January 1st)
Martin Luther King's Day (the third Monday in January)
Presidents' Day (the third Monday in February)
Cesar Chavez Day (March 31)
Memorial Day (the last Monday in May)
Independence Day (July 4th)
Labor Day (the first Monday in September)
Veterans' Day (November 11th)
Thanksgiving Day
The day after Thanksgiving
Christmas Eve half day (December 24th)
Christmas Day (December 25th)
New Year's Eve half day (December 31st)
Employees shall be entitled to holiday pay if an observed holiday falls on an employee's regularly scheduled workday and if the employee is in paid status on the day before or the day after an observed holiday.
552
3 Section V. Paid Leaves
A. Annual Leave
i. Accrual Levels:

Unrepresented Employees will accrue annual leave based on the following schedule:

Years of
Service
Months of
Service
Biweekly
Accruals
Annual
Accruals
Maximum
Accrual
<5 0-59 6.24 162.24 324.48
5-6 60-71 7.47 194.22 388.44
6-7 72-83 7.78 202.28 404.56
7-8 84-95 8.09 210.34 420.68
8-9 96-107 8.40 218.40 436.80
9-10 108-119 8.70 226.20 452.40
10-11 120-131 9.54 248.04 496.08
11-12 132-143 9.85 256.10 512.20
12-13 144-155 10-16 264.16 528.32
13-14 156-167 10.46 271.96 543.92
14-15 168-179 10.77 280.02 560.04
15+ 180+ 11.78 306.28 612.56
Executive Employees will accrue annual leave based on the following schedule:

Years of
Service
Months of
Service
Biweekly
Accruals
Annual
Accruals
Maximum
Accruals
<2 0-23 7.16 186.16 372.34
2-5 24-59 9.62 250.12 500.24
5 60+ 12.08 314.08 628.16
553
4 iii. Maximum Annual Leave Accrual
a. Once an employee reaches his or her maximum annual leave accrual, he or she will not be permitted to accrue any additional annual leave until he or she uses sufficient annual leave so as to bring his or her annual leave balance below the applicable cap. Accrual will recommence in the following pay period.
iv. Redemption
a. Employees, regardless of full-time years of service, may receive pay for redemption of up to one hundred (100) hours of annual leave during each calendar year. The redemption may occur at any time and will be requested using the appropriate form provided by Payroll.
b. Executive employees who have any leave banks outside of their current annual leave bank, administrative leave bank, or sick leave bank, may convert the hours which equate to $25,000 per year at their current hourly rate and have that sum placed into their 401(a) account. The amount to be converted and deposited into the 401(a) account may not exceed the annual IRS limits and shall be done in December of each calendar year.
v. Payment Upon Separation
a. Any employee who leaves the service of the City shall be paid for accrued annual leave to which such employee is otherwise entitled at his/her then current base wage as of the effective date of separation from City service.
b. Executive Employees who are retiring from City Service and were promoted from a lower level position into an executive position and accrued sick leave in a previous bargaining unit, shall be eligible to receive cash for their accrued sick leave at the rate of pay they made when they last held a non-executive position. The cash out will be fifty percent (50%) of the bank not to exceed 600 hours. Public Safety Employees who opt to purchase the CalPERS service credit are not eligible for this cash out. vi. Discontinuance of Reserve Leave Program and Treatment of Accrued Reserve Leave.

b. If an employee were previously permitted to create and maintain a reserve leave bank, such employee's reserve leave bank balance will remain available for use by employees as annual leave, subject to the conditions for use set forth in this section. Employees will no longer be permitted to add additional hours to their reserve leave banks and new employees will not be permitted to create reserve leave banks.

B. Administrative Leave
i. At the start of each fiscal year, Unrepresented Employees will be granted sixty (60) hours of administrative leave.
ii. At the start of each fiscal year, Executive Employees will be granted eighty (80) hours of administrative leave.
554
5 iii. Administrative leave not taken during the fiscal year in which it is granted shall not be carried over to the subsequent fiscal year; employees shall not be permitted to maintain an administrative leave balance in excess of what they receive annually. Administrative Leave has no cash value and cannot be cashed out if unused at the end of the fiscal year in which it was granted or upon separation.

Section VI. Health and Welfare Benefits
A. Health Insurance
The City offers affordable health coverage that meets minimum value standards under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) to all eligible members. An eligible member is one who qualifies under the Look Back Measurement Safe Harbor (average of 30 hours per week), as adopted by Resolution and implemented under the City’s implementation plan.

Medical - The City will establish a two level medical plan whereby the first level may only consist of employees who were employed with the City prior to January 1, 2023. All employees hired on or after January 1, 2023 shall only be eligible for the medical benefits described under level two. Employees will be able to make a change during the open enrollment period which commences in the fall of 2022. At that time, employees will be able to elect a change into one of the two levels. i. Level One
Under the tier one plan, the City shall freeze its contribution at $1,543 per month for those employees who elect a medical plan. The City shall provide $1,243 to those employees who “waive” health insurance and provide proof of other coverage with a medical plan which does not consist of any plan on the “Covered California” Exchange.

Employees who receive cash back will continue to receive this benefit. Cash back is defined as the difference between the premium for the plan the employee has chosen and the $1,543 contribution the City makes. It is understood that by remaining in the tier one program that this cash back will diminish as medical insurance premiums increase each year.

Provided that the employee has no changes in plan selection or level of plan, i.e. employee, employee plus one, or family, the employee may remain in the tier one plan. The following changes would prompt removal from tier one and placement into tier two:

1. An employee who experiences a change of family circumstances such as a marriage, divorce, birth, child aging out etc., which would change their level of coverage.

2. An employee who elects to change their insurance carrier, i.e. changing from Kaiser to Blue Shield.

3. The employee opts to waive coverage or drops coverage due to securing coverage elsewhere.

An employee will not be changed from tier one to two tier if the change of insurance carrier is due to no fault of their own, i.e. PERS discontinues your insurance carrier, or there is a death in the family.
ii. Level Two
Employees who begin their employment with the City after January 1, 2023, or current employees who make any changes to their health care plan including a change in coverage level 555
6 i.e., employee, employee plus one, family and/or a change in carrier, will be placed into the second tier medical plan. The specifics of this plan are as follows:

Single, Single plus one, and Family Plan – City contribution change is effective the first full pay period in January of the year specified
2023 – City contribution will increase by $231 per month to $1,774 2024 – City contribution will increase by 5% to $1,863 per month 2025 – City contribution will increase by 5% to $1,956 per month Effective the 2023 benefit plan year, employees who elect medical will not receive any cash back from the City’s contribution if such contribution is in excess of the plan premium.

Employees who show proof of other qualifying coverage, which does not include any plans contained in “Covered California, are eligible to receive $500/month for waiving coverage.

B. Dental Insurance
i. The City shall contribute the sum of thirty dollars and eighty-three cents ($30.83) biweekly to the employee's dental insurance cafeteria plan for dental programs provided by the City.

Regular full time employees that are employees for more than ninety (90) days and who "opt-out" of dental coverage will receive $30.83 bi-weekly additional taxable income.

C. Flex Spending Plan
i. Employees may participate in the voluntary Flex Spending Plan so long the plan is offered by the City and permitted under IRS rules and regulations.

Section VII. Term Life Insurance/STD/LTD
A. The City shall provide a term life insurance policy to all employees covered by this Resolution in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000). Additionally, employees will be provided a term life insurance policy of one time their annual salary. City-provided life insurance coverage is only in effect as long as the employee is employed by the City. Additional group term life insurance may be purchased by the individual employee.

B. The City shall provide a Short Term Disability (STD) plan and a Long Term Disability (LTD) plan.

Section VIII. Deferred Compensation
A. Employees shall be permitted to participate in the City's section 457 deferred compensation plan for as long as such a plan is maintained by the City. Employees will have the option to convert up to eighty (80) hours of accrued vacation or annual leave for deposit into a section 457 deferred compensation plan each calendar year. Employees who have 5 years of service will have eighty (80) hours of vacation or annual leave placed into the 401(a) account provided that this conversion does not draw their leave balance below 200 hours. This conversion is in lieu of the previously mentioned 80 hour conversion for the 457 account. Employees do not have the option to opt out of this annual conversion. The conversion will occur with the first full pay 556
7 period in July of each year.

B. The City shall make a non-elective employer contribution of four point five percent (4.5%) of employee base pay/salary to the City-sponsored 401(a) plan for all employees in this Resolution.

C. Effective the first full pay period in August 2022, the City shall establish a retirement health savings account for each employee under this Resolution. The City shall make a non-elective employer contribution of one percent (1%) of employee base pay/salary to the plan.

Section IX. Retirement
A. CalPERS Retirement for Miscellaneous Employees Hired before January 1, 2013 i. The City's contract with CalPERS provides for the two percent (2%) at age fifty- five (55) retirement formula.
ii. The City's contract with CalPERS provides for the "Single Highest Year" retirement benefit.
iii. Executive Employees and unrepresented employees who are subject to the “classic miscellaneous formula” will pay the full employee share of seven percent (7%). iv. The City has adopted the CalPERS resolution in accordance with 26 U.S.C. section 414, subdivision (h)(2) to ensure that the employee contribution is made on a pre-tax basis B. CalPERS Retirement for Miscellaneous Employees Hired on or after January 1, 2013 iii. "New Members", as defined by the Public Employees' Pension Reform Act ("PEPRA") are covered by the two percent (2%) at age sixty two (62) retirement formula. iv. New Members' retirement benefit will be based on the highest 36 consecutive months of compensation earnable.
iii. New Members will pay an employee contribution to CalPERS at the rate of fifty percent (50%) of the total "normal cost" of the plan as defined by CalPERS. This amount may change from year to year, as determined by CalPERS. This employee contribution will be paid through a payroll deduction.
iv. The City has adopted the CalPERS resolution in accordance with 26 U.S.C. section 414, subdivision (h)(2) to ensure that the employee contribution is made on a pre-tax basis. The City's contract with CalPERS contains the Fourth Level Survivor Benefit and Military Service Credit for all employees.

C. CalPERS Retirement for Safety Employees Hired before January 1, 2013 i. The City's contract with CalPERS provides for the three percent (3%) at age fifty (50) retirement formula.
ii. The City's contract with CalPERS provides for the "Single Highest Year" retirement benefit.
iii. Permanent safety Executive Employees will pay 7% of the employee contribution and 557
8 the City will pick up the remaining 2%.
iv. The City has adopted the CalPERS resolution in accordance with 26 U.S.C. section 414, subdivision (h)(2) to ensure that the employee contribution is made on a pre-tax basis. v. For Department Heads who are designated as Safety, the City shall provide uniforms with the estimated value of $450 per year. Such amount shall be reported to CalPERS pursuant to the City’s contract with CalPERS.

D. CalPERS Retirement for Safety Employees Hired on or after January 1, 2013 i. The City's contract with CalPERS provides for the two point seven percent (2.7%) at age fifty-seven (57) retirement formula.
ii. New Member’s retirement benefit will be based on the highest 36 consecutive months of compensation earnable.
iii. New Members of the City's police retirement plan will pay an employee contribution to PERS at the rate of fifty percent (50%) of the total "normal cost" of the plan as defined by CalPERS. This amount may change from year to year, as determined by CalPERS. This employee contribution will be paid through a payroll deduction.

E. Supplemental Retirement Contribution
i. For employees under this Resolution who are in the legacy “PARS” supplemental retirement program (program), the City shall continue to provide the supplemental retirement benefits to include the three percent (3%) at age sixty (60) supplemental retirement formula and the highest consecutive twelve-month period retirement formula.
ii. The employees' contribution to the program shall be eight percent (8%) of the wages upon which the employee's retirement contributions are computed. The City shall pay three percent (3%) of the employee contribution for eligible executives, in addition to the actuarially calculated employer contribution. Eligible executive employees shall contribute the remaining five percent (5%). The City shall pay two point five percent (2.5%) of the employee contribution for Confidential Non- Management Employees, in addition to the actuarially calculated employer contribution. Confidential Non-Management Employees shall contribute the remaining five point five percent (5.5%).
iii. Under California Government Code section 20636, subdivision (c)(4), the City shall report to the program as compensation earnable the City's payment of the required employee retirement contributions to PERS.
iv. Employees hired on or after January 1, 2013, who are "new members" as defined in PEPRA, including "classic" employees coming from another CalPERS jurisdiction, shall not be eligible to receive any of the programs’ benefit.

Section X. City Rights
A. The City has and will continue to retain, whether exercised or not, the unilateral and exclusive right operate, administer and manage its municipal services and workforce performing those 558
9 services in all respects. The exclusive rights of City shall include, but not be limited to, the right to determine the organization of City government and the purpose and mission of its constituent agencies, to set standards of services to be offered to the public, and, through its City Manager and department directors to exercise control and discretion over its organization and operations, to establish and implement administrative regulations and employment rules and regulations consistent with law, to direct employees, to classify and reclassify positions, to take disciplinary action for just cause, to relieve employees from duty because of lack of work or for other legitimate reasons, to determine whether goods or services shall be made, purchased or contracted for, to determine the methods, means and numbers and kinds of personnel by which City's services are provided, including the right to schedule and assign work and overtime, and to otherwise act in the interest of efficient service to the community.

Section XI. Severance

A. This section only applies to employees under this Resolution who are considered “At-will” pursuant to City Ordinance. At the option of the City Manager, at will employees whose services are terminated by the City Manager may receive severance up to $75,000. If a severance offer is extended, such offer will be accompanied by a waiver of liability agreement which has been approved by the City Attorney, which the employee must sign to be eligible for the severance. The amount of the severance is exclusive of any applicable leave cash outs required by law.

Section XII. Moving Expenses
A. The City Manager is authorized to approve reimbursement for moving expenses when it is deemed necessary to successfully recruit management level candidates. The maximum allowed is $10,000.

Section XI. Severability
A. It is understood and agreed that this Resolution is subject to all current and future applicable Federal and State laws and regulations and the current provisions of the Oxnard City Code. If any part or provision of this Resolution is in conflict or inconsistent with such applicable provisions of those Federal, State, or City enactments or is otherwise held to be invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such part or provisions shall be suspended and superseded by such applicable law or regulations, and the remainder of this Resolution shall not be affected Section XII. Conflicting Resolutions
A. All resolutions, parts of resolutions, contracts, or City policies and procedures in conflict with this Resolution, are hereby repealed. This Resolution hereby supersedes Resolution No. 15,285 adopted by the City Council on November 19, 2019.

Section XIII. Effective Date
A. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption by the City Council. This Resolution shall remain in full force and effect, unless amended, repealed or otherwise modified by the City Council.

559
10 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of July 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_____________________________________
John C. Zaragoza, Mayor
ATTEST:

Rose Chaparro, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Stephen Fischer, City Attorney

560
11 EXHIBIT A
Executive Classifications
Assistant City Manager
City Attorney
City Clerk
City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Department Head I
Department Head II
Department Head III
Fire Chief
Police Chief
Unrepresented
Assistant City Attorney
Chief Assistant City Attorney
Deputy City Attorney I/II/III
Assistant Director I NRC
Assistant Director II NRC
561

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD
RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 15,594 AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY SCHEDULES PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 4 OF THE CITY PERSONNEL RULES AND

REGULATIONS
WHEREAS, Chapter 4, Article 4.5 of the City of Oxnard Personnel Rules and Regulations requires that the City of Oxnard classification listing all classes of positions in the general city service be established by resolution of the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, Chapter 4, Article 4.7 of the City of Oxnard Personnel Rules and Regulations provides that the City Manager from time to time may revise the number of positions in each classification as necessary to perform the work of the classification, provided that the total expense to be incurred for such work shall be limited to the amount appropriated by the City Council for the classification; and,
WHEREAS, Chapter 4, Article 4.8 of the City of Oxnard Personnel Rules and Regulations provides that the City Manager shall recommend to the City Council the creation of a new or additional position allocated to an existing class whenever possible; otherwise, the City Manager shall recommend to the City Council the creation of a new classification; and, WHEREAS, Chapter 4, Article 4.9 of the City of Oxnard Personnel Rules and Regulations requires City Council approval to establish a new classification title and salary range attached as Attachment A of this resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Oxnard resolves to amend Exhibit “A” of Resolution No. 15,594 in accordance with Chapter 4, Articles 4.5, 4.7, 4.8 and 4.9 of the City of Oxnard Personnel Rules and Regulations, by adding the following classifications and establishing salary ranges for those classifications effective August 6, 2022.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of July 2022, by the following vote:

YES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN
_________________
John C. Zaragoza, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Rose Chaparro, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Stephen M. Fischer, City Attorney
562

ATTACHMENT A

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
563

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Administrative Legal Secretary S15 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.4652 32.5182
BIWEEKLY 1317.22 2601.46
ANNUAL 34247.62 67637.86
Administrative Services Coordinator / Support Supervisor S30 Lower Upper Hourly 21.1618 41.3294
BIWEEKLY 1692.94 3306.35
ANNUAL 44016.54 85965.15
Administrative Services Specialist S15 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.4652 32.5182
BIWEEKLY 1317.22 2601.46
ANNUAL 34247.62 67637.86
Administrative Services Specialist, Senior S25 Lower Upper Hourly 22.4467 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1795.74 2989.78
ANNUAL 46689.14 77734.18
Administrative Services Technician S10 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2291 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1218.33 2343.35
ANNUAL 31676.53 60927.15
Administrative Services Technician, Senior S05 Lower Upper Hourly 16.0730 30.7791
BIWEEKLY 1285.84 2462.33
ANNUAL 33431.84 64020.53
Animal Safety Officer I05 Lower Upper
Hourly 18.0625 30.7791
BIWEEKLY 1445.00 2462.33
ANNUAL 37570.00 64020.53
Animal Safety Officer, Senior I25 Lower Upper
Hourly 21.9311 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1754.49 2989.78
ANNUAL 45616.69 77734.18
Class Code
564

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Assistant City Manager E19 Lower Upper
Hourly 78.7151 133.8157
BIWEEKLY 6297.21 10705.26
ANNUAL 163727.41 278336.66
Assistant City Treasurer / Department Director 1 E04 Lower Upper Hourly 62.1611 105.6738
BIWEEKLY 4972.89 8453.90
ANNUAL 129295.09 219801.50
Assistant Engineer S45 Lower Upper
Hourly 34.5859 51.8788
BIWEEKLY 2766.87 4150.30
ANNUAL 71938.67 107907.90
Associate Engineer S50 Lower Upper
Hourly 33.9943 56.6625
BIWEEKLY 2719.54 4533.00
ANNUAL 70708.14 117858.00
Building / Construction Inspector I30 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.2671 41.3294
BIWEEKLY 2341.37 3306.35
ANNUAL 60875.57 85965.15
Building / Construction Inspector, Senior I40 Lower Upper Hourly 30.0473 45.0710
BIWEEKLY 2403.78 3605.68
ANNUAL 62498.38 93747.68
Civil Engineer S55 Lower Upper
Hourly 41.9516 62.9274
BIWEEKLY 3356.13 5034.19
ANNUAL 87259.33 130888.99
Code Compliance Inspector I25 Lower Upper
Hourly 21.9311 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1754.49 2989.78
ANNUAL 45616.69 77734.18
Community Paramedic I43 Lower Upper
Hourly 25.0829 45.0709
BIWEEKLY 2006.63 3605.67
ANNUAL 52172.43 93747.47
565

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Cultural & Recreation Services Specialist S15 Lower Upper Hourly 16.4652 32.5182
BIWEEKLY 1317.22 2601.46
ANNUAL 34247.62 67637.86
Cultural & Recreation Services Technician S10 Lower Upper Hourly 15.2291 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1218.33 2343.35
ANNUAL 31676.53 60927.15
Cultural & Recreation Services Technician, Senior S05 Lower Upper Hourly 16.0730 30.7791
BIWEEKLY 1285.84 2462.33
ANNUAL 33431.84 64020.53
Deputy City Manager E26 Lower Upper
Hourly 72.3149 122.9354
BIWEEKLY 5785.19 9834.83
ANNUAL 150414.99 255705.63
Electrician I20 Lower Upper
Hourly 24.6523 34.5131
BIWEEKLY 1972.18 2761.05
ANNUAL 51276.78 71787.25
Emergency Communications Call Taker S10 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2291 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1218.33 2343.35
ANNUAL 31676.53 60927.15
Engineering Technician S25 Lower Upper
Hourly 22.4467 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1795.74 2989.78
ANNUAL 46689.14 77734.18
Engineering Technician Supervisor S35 Lower Upper
Hourly 27.6286 45.0709
BIWEEKLY 2210.29 3605.67
ANNUAL 57467.49 93747.47
Fire Chief E07 Lower Upper
Hourly 69.4952 117.7884
BIWEEKLY 5559.62 9423.07
ANNUAL 144550.02 244999.87
566

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Fleet Services Mechanic I25 Lower Upper
Hourly 21.9311 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1754.49 2989.78
ANNUAL 45616.69 77734.18
Fleet Services Mechanic, Senior I30 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.2671 41.3294
BIWEEKLY 2341.37 3306.35
ANNUAL 60875.57 85965.15
Fleet Services Technician I10 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.2711 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1301.69 2343.35
ANNUAL 33843.89 60927.15
Fleet Services Worker I00 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.7642 28.0653
BIWEEKLY 1341.14 2245.22
ANNUAL 34869.54 58375.82
HVAC Mechanic I20 Lower Upper
Hourly 24.6523 34.5131
BIWEEKLY 1972.18 2761.05
ANNUAL 51276.78 71787.25
Information Technology Specialist S20 Lower Upper
Hourly 24.6522 34.5131
BIWEEKLY 1972.18 2761.05
ANNUAL 51276.58 71787.25
Information Technology Technician S10 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2291 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1218.33 2343.35
ANNUAL 31676.53 60927.15
Laboratory Specialist S25 Lower Upper
Hourly 22.4467 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1795.74 2989.78
ANNUAL 46689.14 77734.18
Librarian S25 Lower Upper
Hourly 22.4467 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1795.74 2989.78
ANNUAL 46689.14 77734.18
567

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Librarian, Senior S30 Lower Upper
Hourly 21.1618 41.3294
BIWEEKLY 1692.94 3306.35
ANNUAL 44016.54 85965.15
Library Monitor S00 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2484 28.0653
BIWEEKLY 1219.87 2245.22
ANNUAL 31716.67 58375.82
Library Technician S10 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2291 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1218.33 2343.35
ANNUAL 31676.53 60927.15
Library Technician, Senior S05 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.0730 30.7791
BIWEEKLY 1285.84 2462.33
ANNUAL 33431.84 64020.53
Maintenance Specialist I15 Lower Upper
Hourly 18.8905 32.5182
BIWEEKLY 1511.24 2601.46
ANNUAL 39292.24 67637.86
Maintenance Specialist, Senior I25 Lower Upper
Hourly 21.9311 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1754.49 2989.78
ANNUAL 45616.69 77734.18
Maintenance Technician I10 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.2711 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1301.69 2343.35
ANNUAL 33843.89 60927.15
Maintenance Technician, Senior I05 Lower Upper
Hourly 18.0625 30.7791
BIWEEKLY 1445.00 2462.33
ANNUAL 37570.00 64020.53
Maintenance Worker I00 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.7642 28.0653
BIWEEKLY 1341.14 2245.22
ANNUAL 34869.54 58375.82
568

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Paralegal S42 Lower Upper
Hourly 32.9551 46.1371
BIWEEKLY 2636.41 3690.97
ANNUAL 68546.61 95965.17
Permit Technician S25 Lower Upper
Hourly 22.4467 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1795.74 2989.78
ANNUAL 46689.14 77734.18
Planner S40 Lower Upper
Hourly 32.2313 48.3469
BIWEEKLY 2578.50 3867.75
ANNUAL 67041.10 100561.55
Planner, Assistant S35 Lower Upper
Hourly 27.6286 45.0709
BIWEEKLY 2210.29 3605.67
ANNUAL 57467.49 93747.47
Plans Examiner S30 Lower Upper
Hourly 21.1618 41.3294
BIWEEKLY 1692.94 3306.35
ANNUAL 44016.54 85965.15
Plant Maintenance Specialist I25 Lower Upper
Hourly 21.9311 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1754.49 2989.78
ANNUAL 45616.69 77734.18
Plant Maintenance Specialist, Senior I30 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.2671 41.3294
BIWEEKLY 2341.37 3306.35
ANNUAL 60875.57 85965.15
Plant Operations Shift Coordinator I45 Lower Upper
Hourly 34.5859 51.8788
BIWEEKLY 2766.87 4150.30
ANNUAL 71938.67 107907.90
Plant Operator I15 Lower Upper
Hourly 18.8905 32.5182
BIWEEKLY 1511.24 2601.46
ANNUAL 39292.24 67637.86
569

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Plant Operator, Principal I35 Lower Upper
Hourly 28.6905 43.2524
BIWEEKLY 2295.24 3460.19
ANNUAL 59676.24 89964.99
Plant Operator, Senior I20 Lower Upper
Hourly 24.6523 34.5131
BIWEEKLY 1972.18 2761.05
ANNUAL 51276.78 71787.25
Plant Operator Trainee I10 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.2711 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1301.69 2343.35
ANNUAL 33843.89 60927.15
Police Corporal P02 Lower Upper
Hourly 47.0861 61.9370
BIWEEKLY 3766.89 4954.96
ANNUAL 97939.09 128828.96
Police Officer P01 Lower Upper
Hourly 34.9341 54.6567
BIWEEKLY 2794.73 4372.54
ANNUAL 72662.93 113685.94
Police Sergeant P03 Lower Upper
Hourly 47.0861 71.2274
BIWEEKLY 3766.89 5698.19
ANNUAL 97939.09 148152.99
Police Service Offer P04 Lower Upper
Hourly 30.3134 47.4270
BIWEEKLY 2425.07 3794.16
ANNUAL 63051.87 98648.16
Police Records Technician S10 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2291 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1218.33 2343.35
ANNUAL 31676.53 60927.15
Police Records Technician, Senior S05 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.0730 30.7791
BIWEEKLY 1285.84 2462.33
ANNUAL 33431.84 64020.53
570

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Property and Evidence Technician S10 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2291 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1218.33 2343.35
ANNUAL 31676.53 60927.15
Public Safety Analyst S35 Lower Upper
Hourly 27.6286 45.0709
BIWEEKLY 2210.29 3605.67
ANNUAL 57467.49 93747.47
Public Safety Analyst, Senior S45 Lower Upper
Hourly 34.5859 51.8788
BIWEEKLY 2766.87 4150.30
ANNUAL 71938.67 107907.90
Public Safety Dispatcher I P07 Lower Upper
Hourly 25.8976 40.0201
BIWEEKLY 2071.81 3201.61
ANNUAL 53867.01 83241.81
Public Safety Dispatcher II P08 Lower Upper
Hourly 27.2188 44.0221
BIWEEKLY 2177.50 3521.77
ANNUAL 56615.10 91565.97
Public Safety Dispatcher III P09 Lower Upper
Hourly 36.8844 51.5059
BIWEEKLY 2950.75 4120.47
ANNUAL 76719.55 107132.27
Public Safety Field Assistant S00 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2484 28.0653
BIWEEKLY 1219.87 2245.22
ANNUAL 31716.67 58375.82
Public Safety Field Technician S10 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2291 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1218.33 2343.35
ANNUAL 31676.53 60927.15
Public Safety Field Technician, Senior S05 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.0730 30.7791
BIWEEKLY 1285.84 2462.33
ANNUAL 33431.84 64020.53
571

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Public Safety Investigative Specialist S15 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.4652 32.5182
BIWEEKLY 1317.22 2601.46
ANNUAL 34247.62 67637.86
Public Safety Investigative Specialist, Senior S25 Lower Upper Hourly 22.4467 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1795.74 2989.78
ANNUAL 46689.14 77734.18
Senior Engineer S60 Lower Upper
Hourly 45.8790 73.4064
BIWEEKLY 3670.32 5872.51
ANNUAL 95428.32 152685.31
Senior Police Service Officer P05 Lower Upper
Hourly 38.7119 52.1693
BIWEEKLY 3096.95 4173.54
ANNUAL 80520.75 108512.14
Survey Party Chief I25 Lower Upper
Hourly 21.9311 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1754.49 2989.78
ANNUAL 45616.69 77734.18
Utilities Field Specialist I15 Lower Upper
Hourly 18.8905 32.5182
BIWEEKLY 1511.24 2601.46
ANNUAL 39292.24 67637.86
Utilities Field Supervisor I31 Lower Upper
Hourly 27.0277 42.1799
BIWEEKLY 2162.22 3374.39
ANNUAL 56217.62 87734.19
Utilities Field Technician I10 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.2711 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1301.69 2343.35
ANNUAL 33843.89 60927.15
Utilities Field Technician, Senior I05 Lower Upper
Hourly 18.0625 30.7791
BIWEEKLY 1445.00 2462.33
ANNUAL 37570.00 64020.53
572

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Utilities Technical Services Coordinator I30 Lower Upper Hourly 29.2671 41.3294
BIWEEKLY 2341.37 3306.35
ANNUAL 60875.57 85965.15
Utilities Technical Services Specialist I15 Lower Upper Hourly 18.8905 32.5182
BIWEEKLY 1511.24 2601.46
ANNUAL 39292.24 67637.86
Utilities Technical Services Specialist, Senior I20 Lower Upper Hourly 24.6523 34.5131
BIWEEKLY 1972.18 2761.05
ANNUAL 51276.78 71787.25
573

CITY COUNCIL OF THECITY OF OXNARD
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 15,593 AUTHORIZING FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 4 OF THE CITY PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS WHEREAS.Chapter 4, Section 4.7 oftheCity of Oxnard Personnel Rules and Regulations providesthat the City Manager from time to time may revise the number of positions in each classification as necessary to perform the work of the classification, provided that the total expense to be incurred forsuch work shall be limited to the amount appropriated by the City Council forthe classification: and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the revisions attached as Attachment A of this resolution and finds that they are desirable and in the interest of maintaining an efficient municipal organization.

NOW, THEREFORE. the City Council of the City of Oxnard resolves to amend Resolution No. 15,593 with the following changes to the adopted FY 22/23 position allocations as specified, subject to approval of a budget appropriation for the revised allocation.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of July 2022, by the following vote:

YES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

John C. Zaragoza, Mayor
ATTEST:

Rose Chaparro, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Stephen M. Fischer, City Attorney
574

ATTACHMENT A

POSITION CONTROL LISTING
575
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation

CITY ATTORNEY
ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SECRETARY ( C ) 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SECRETARY I 1 -1 0
CITY ATTORNEY DEPT TOTAL 1 0 1

CITY CLERK
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 1 -1 0
CITY CLERK DEPT TOTAL 1 0 1
CITY MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR ( C ) 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (C) 1 -1 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT I 1 -1 0
CITY MANAGER DEPT TOTAL 2 0 2

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 3 3
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 0 3 3
BUILDING/CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR 0 8 8
BUILDING/CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR, SENIOR 0 4 4
CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR 0 7 7
PLANS EXAMINER 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 2 -2 0
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 2 -2 0
BUILDING INSPECTOR II 5 -5 0
CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR II 7 -7 0
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 3 -3 0
ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR 1 -1 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 3 -3 0
PLAN CHECK ENGINEER 3 -3 0
PLANS EXAMINER II ( PLANNERS EXAMINER 1 -1 0
SR. CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR 2 -2 0
SR. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR 1 -1 0
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TOTAL 30 0 30

DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT
576
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 1 1
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR II 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 1 -1 0
DRAFT/GRAPH TECHNICIAN II 1 -1 0
DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT TOTAL 4 0 4

LAND USE PLAN & ENV PROTC
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
PLANNER 0 5 5
PLANNER, ASSISTANT 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 1 -1 0
ASSISTANT PLANNER 3 -3 0
ASSOCIATE PLANNER 5 -5 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 1 -1 0
LAND USE PLAN & ENV PROTC TOTAL 10 0 10
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TOTAL 44 0 44

CULTURAL & COMMUNITY SERVICES

LIBRARY

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
LIBRARIAN 0 7 7
LIBRARIAN, SENIOR 0 4 4
LIBRARY TECHNICIAN 0 10.5 10.5
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1 -1 0
LIBRARIAN I 6 -6 0
LIBRARIAN II 1 -1 0
LIBRARIAN III 4 -4 0
LIBRARY AIDE I 5.5 -5.5 0
LIBRARY AIDE II 5 -5 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 1 -1 0
LIBRARY SERVICES TOTAL 23.5 0 23.5

RECREATION SERVICES

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 2 2
577
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 2 2
CULTURAL & RECREATION SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 56.75 56.75 CULTURAL & RECREATION SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 2 2
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR I 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
CULTURAL & COMMUNITY SVCS DIR 1 -1 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 2 -2 0
RECREATION/HUMAN SERV LEADER I 1 -1 0
RECREATION/HUMAN SERV LEADER II 1 -1 0
RECREATION/HUMAN SERV LEADER III 56.75 -56.75 0
RECREATION SERVICES TOTAL 64.75 0 64.75
CULTURAL & COMMUNITY SVCS TOTAL 88.25 0 88.25

DEPT OF BILLING AND LICENSING
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 10 10

ASSISTANT CITY TREASURER/DEPARTMENT
DIRECTOR I 0 1 1
CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR 0 1 1
ACCOUNT CLERK I 1 -1 0
ACCOUNT CLERK II 2 -2 0
ACCOUNT CLERK III 1 -1 0
ASSITANT CITY TREASURER / DIR. REV & LIC 1 -1 0
CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR I 1 -1 0
CUSTOMER SERVICE ACCT TECH 2 -2 0
CUSTOMER SERVICE REP II 7 -7 0
REVENUE COLLECTION TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
SR. CUSTOMER SERVICE REP 2 -2 0
DEPT OF BILLING AND LICENSING TOTAL 18 0 18

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATOR/SUPPORT
SUPERVISOR ( C ) 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1.5 1.5
578
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 2 2
ASSISTANT DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR NRC I 0 2 2
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR II 0 1 1
ACCOUNT CLERK II 1 -1 0
ACCOUNT CLERK III 2 -2 0
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 2 -2 0
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (C) 2 -2 0
ASSISTANT CHIEF FIN OFFICER 2 -2 0
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 1 -1 0
MAIL CLERK 1.5 -1.5 0
FINANCE DEPARTMENT TOTAL 11.5 0 11.5

FIRE DEPARTMENT

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR ( C ) 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 2 2
CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR 0 4 4
PLANS EXAMINER 0 1 1
PUBLIC SAFETY INVESTIGATIVE SPECIALIST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (C) 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY II 2 -2 0
CRIME ANALYSIS DATA TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
FIRE INSPECTOR II (Non-Sworn) 4 -4 0
PLANS EXAMINER II 1 -1 0
FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL 9 0 9

HOUSING

HOUSING AUTHORITY

ADMINISTRATIE SERVICES
COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 7 7
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 8 8
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 6 6
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 1 1
CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR 0 1 1
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR II 0 1 1
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST 0 6 6
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 1 1
MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN 0 4 4
579
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
ACCOUNT CLERK III 1 -1 0
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 1 -1 0
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT COORDINATOR 1 -1 0
DIRECTOR OF HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT 1 -1 0
FAC MAINT WORKER II 2 -2 0
GROUNDSWORKER I 1 -1 0
GROUNDSWORKER II 3 -3 0
HOUSING INSPECTOR 1 -1 0
HOUSING SPECIALIST I 5 -5 0
HOUSING SPECIALIST II 6 -6 0
MAINTENANCE WORKER HOUSING 4 -4 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT I 2 -2 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 5 -5 0
RESIDENT SERVICES COORDINATOR 1 -1 0
SR. HOUSING MAINTENANCE WORKER 1 -1 0
SR. HOUSING SPECIALIST 3 -3 0
HOUSING AUTHORITY TOTAL 39 0 39

HOUSING SERVICES
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
HOMELESS PROGRAMS ASSISTANT 1 -1 0
REHAB LOAN SPECIALIST 1 -1 0
HOUSING SERVICES TOTAL 4 0 4
HOUSING DEPARTMENT TOTAL 43 0 43

HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR ( C ) 0 2 2

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST, SENIOR (
C ) 0 9 9
ASSISTANT DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR NRC I 0 1 1
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR I 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (C) 2 -2 0
ASSITANT HR DIRECTOR (C) 1 -1 0
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR 1 -1 0
HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN (C ) 7 -7 0
PAYROLL TECHNICIAN (C) 2 -2 0
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT TOTAL 13 0 13
580
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation

INFORMATION SVS OPERATION

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 1 1
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SPECIALIST 0 6 6
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1 -1 0
COMPUTER NETWORK ENGINEER II 5 -5 0
GEOGRAPHIC INFO SYSTEMS TECH II 1 -1 0
INFORMATION SVS OPERATION TOTAL 7 0 7

POLICE DEPARTMENT

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR ( C ) 0 2 2

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST, SENIOR (
C ) 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 2 2
ANIMAL SAFETY OFFICER, SENIOR 0 1 1
POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN 0 21 21
POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 2 2
PROPERTY & EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN 0 5 5
PUBLIC SAFETY ANALYST 0 3 3
PUBLIC SAFETY FIELD ASSISTANT 0 6 6
PUBLIC SAFETY FIELD TECHNICIAN 0 14 14
PUBLIC SAFETY FIELD TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 1 1
PUBLIC SAFETY INVESTIGATIVE SPECIALIST 0 14 14

PUBLIC SAFETY INVESTIGATIVE SPECIALIST,
SENIOR 0 3 3
ACCOUNT CLERK III 2 -2 0
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (C) 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SVC'S ASSISTANT 2 -2 0
COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER 10 -10 0
CRIME ANALYSIS DATA TECHNICIAN 2 -2 0
CRIME ANALYST I 2 -2 0
CRIME ANALYST II 1 -1 0
CROSSING GUARD 6 -6 0
EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN II 3 -3 0
MISSING PERSONS SPECIALIST 1 -1 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 1 -1 0
POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN II 14 -14 0
581
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN III 2 -2 0
POLICE WORD PROCESSOR II 7 -7 0
PROPERTY & EVIDENCE TECH II 5 -5 0
SEX REGISTRANT SPECIALIST 1 -1 0
SR. TRAFFIC SERVICE ASST 1 -1 0
SUPERVISING ANIMAL SAFETY OFFICER 1 -1 0
TRAFFIC SERVICE ASST II 14 -14 0
POLICE DEPARTMENT TOTAL 76 0 76

PUBLIC WORKS

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 4 4
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 15 15
ELECTRICIAN 0 1 1
FLEET SERVICES MECHANIC 0 3 3
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST 0 14 14
MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN 0 25 25
MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 66 66
MAINTENANCE WORKER 0 26 26
ACCOUNT CLERK III 4 -4 0
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
CONTAINER SERVICE WORKER 2 -2 0
CUSTOMER SERVICE REP I 2 -2 0
CUSTOMER SERVICE REP II 13 -13 0
EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 12 -12 0
MAINTENANCE WORKER TRAINEE 24 -24 0
MRF DISPATCHER 1 -1 0
MRF MACHINERY OPERATOR 3 -3 0
582
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
MRF MECHANIC 3 -3 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 1 -1 0
SOLID WASTE EQUIP OPER II 49 -49 0
SOLID WASTE TRANS OPERATOR 14 -14 0
SORTER 26 -26 0
TREATMENT PLANT ELECTRICIAN 1 -1 0
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE TOTAL 159 0 159

FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICES
ELECTRICIAN 0 2 2
HVAC MECHANIC 0 2 2
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST 0 9 9
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 2 2
MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN 0 2 2
MAINTENANCE WORKER 0 11 11
CUSTODIAN 11 -11 0
SR. CUSTODIAN 2 -2 0
FAC MAINT WORKER II 6 -6 0
HVAC TECHNICIAN 2 -2 0
MAINTENANCE CARPENTER 2 -2 0
MAINTENANCE ELECTRICIAN 2 -2 0
MAINTENANCE PLUMBER 1 -1 0
SR. FACILITIES MAINTENANCE WORKER 2 -2 0
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICES TOTAL 28 0 28

FLEET SERVICES OPERATION

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
FLEET SERVICES MECHANIC 0 15 15
FLEET SERVICES MECHANIC, SENIOR 0 4 4
FLEET SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
FLEET SERVICES WORKER 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
ACCOUNT CLERK II 1 -1 0
FLEET SERVICES MAINT WORKER 1 -1 0
FLEET SERVICES MECHANIC I 6 -6 0
FLEET SERVICES MECHANIC II 9 -9 0
SR. FLEET SERVICES MECHANIC 4 -4 0
TIRE REPAIRER 1 -1 0
FLEET SERVICES OPERATION TOTAL 23 0 23
583
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation

MAINTENANCE SERVICES

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 2 2
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 6 6
MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN 0 33 33
MAINTENANCE TECHNCIAN, SENIOR 0 20 20
PUBLIC SAFETY INVESTIGATIVE SPECIALIST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY II 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 5 -5 0
GRAFFITI ACTION COORDINATOR 1 -1 0
GROUNDSWORKER I 26 -26 0
GROUNDSWORKER II 7 -7 0
MAINTENANCE PLUMBER 1 -1 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 2 -2 0
SR. GROUNDSWORKER 3 -3 0
SR. STREET MAINT WORKER 4 -4 0
SR. TREE TRIMMER 1 -1 0
STREET MAINT WKR I 5 -5 0
STREET MAINT WKR II 3 -3 0
TRAFFIC SAFETY MAINT WKR 2 -2 0
TREE TRIMMER I 1 -1 0
TREE TRIMMER II 1 -1 0
MAINTENANCE SERVICES TOTAL 65 0 65

PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 2.5 2.5
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR III 0 1 1
ACCOUNT CLERK II 2.5 -2.5 0
ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL ASSISTANT (C) 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 2 -2 0
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1 -1 0
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION TOTAL 6.5 0 6.5
584
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation

SPECIAL DISTRICTS

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 1 1
MAINTENANCE TECHNCIAN 0 1 1
CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
GROUNDWORKER II 1 -1 0
LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR II 3 -3 0
SPECIAL DISTRICTS TOTAL 5 0 5

ENGINEERING & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
ASSISTANT ENGINEER 0 2 2
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 0 2 2
BUILDING/CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR 0 4 4
BUILDING/CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR, SENIOR 0 1 1
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 0 4 4
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN SUPERVISOR 0 1 1
SENIOR ENGINEER 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 2 -2 0
ASSISTANT CIVIL ENGINEER 2 -2 0
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR I 1 -1 0
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 3 -3 0
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT COORDINATOR 3 -3 0
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN II 1 -1 0
JUNIOR CIVIL ENGINEER 2 -2 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 1 -1 0
SR. CIVIL ENGINEER 3 -3 0
SR. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR 1 -1 0
SR. ENGR TECH/SURVEY CHIEF 1 -1 0
ENGINEERING & MAINTENANCE SERIVICES TOTAL 20 0 20

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 0 3 3
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST 0 2 2
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 1 1
ASSISTANT TRAFFIC ENGINEER 2 -2 0
ASSOCIATE TRAFFIC ENGINEER 1 -1 0
ENGINEERING TECH II 1 -1 0
585
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIRER I 1 -1 0
TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIRER II 1 -1 0
TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TOTAL 7 0 7

WATER OPERATION

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 1 1
MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
PLANT MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST 0 1 1
PLANT MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 1 1
PLANT OPERATIONS SHIFT COORDINATOR 0 3 3
PLANT OPERATOR, PRINCIPAL 0 3 3
PLANT OPERATOR, SENIOR 0 2 2
PLANT OPERATOR TRAINEE 0 1 1
UTILITIES FIELD SPECIALIST 0 1 1
UTILITIES FIELD SUPERVISOR 0 4 4
UTILITIES FIELD TECHNICIAN 0 6 6
UTILITIES FIELD TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 21 21
UTILITIES TECHNICAL SERVICES COORDINATOR 0 1 1

UTILITIES TECHNICAL SERVICES SPECIALIST,
SENIOR 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 1 -1 0
ELECTRICIAN/INSTRUMENTATION TECH 1 -1 0
MAINTENANCE WORKER TRAINEE 1 -1 0
METER READER 6 -6 0
METER REPAIR WORKER 3 -3 0
SR. BACKFLOW SPECIALIST 1 -1 0
SR. METER READER 1 -1 0
SR. METER REPAIRER WORKER 1 -1 0
SR. WATER DISTRIBUTION OPERATOR 4 -4 0
SR. WATER MECHANIC 1 -1 0
SR. WATER TREATMENT OPERATOR 3 -3 0
WATER CONSERV/OUTREACH TECH 1 -1 0
WATER DISTRIBUTION OPERATOR I 11 -11 0
WATER DISTRIBUTION OPERATOR II 6 -6 0
WATER OPERATOR IN TRAINING 1 -1 0
WATER REGULATORY COMPL COORD 1 -1 0
WATER REGULATORY COMPL TECH II 2 -2 0
WATER TREATMENT OPERATOR II 2 -2 0
586
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
WATER TREATMENT OPERATOR III 3 -3 0
WATER OPERATION TOTAL 51 0 51

RECYCLE WATER
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 1 1
ELECTRICIAN 0 1 1
PLANT MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 1 1
PLANT OPERATIONS SHIFT COORDINATOR 0 1 1
PLANT OPERATOR, PRINCIPAL 0 4 4
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 1 -1 0
ADVANCED WATER TREATMENT OP III 4 -4 0
SR. ADVANCED WATER TREATMENT OPERATOR 1 -1 0
SR. ADVANCED WATER TREATMENT MECHANIC 1 -1 0
TREATMENT PLANT ELECTRICIAN 1 -1 0
RECYCLE WATER TOTAL 8 0 8

STORM WATER
UTILITIES TECHNICAL SERVICES COORDINATOR 0 1 1
UTILITIES FIELD TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 1 1
WASTEWATER COLLECT OPERATOR II 1 -1 0
WASTEWATER ENVIRONMENTAL SPEC 1 -1 0
STORM WATER TOTAL 2 0 2

WASTEWATER COLLECTION
UTILITIES FIELD SUPERVISOR 0 2 2
UTILITIES FIELD TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 7 7
UTILITIES TECHNICAL SERVICES COORDINATOR 0 7 7
SR. WASTEWATER COLLECTION OPERATOR 2 -2 0
WASTEWATER COLLECT OPERATOR II 7 -7 0
WASTEWATER ENVIRONMENTAL SPEC 7 -7 0
WASTEWATER COLLECTION TOTAL 16 0 16

WASTEWATER TREATMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 2 2
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 0 1 1
ELECTRICIAN 0 2 2
LABORATORY SPECIALIST 0 4 4
MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN 0 2 2
PLANT MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST 0 13 13
PLANT MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 3 3
PLANT OPERATIONS SHIFT COORDINATOR 0 4 4
PLANT OPERATOR, PRINCIPAL 0 6 6
587
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
PLANT OPERATOR, SENIOR 0 12 12
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY II 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 1 -1 0
ASSISTANT CIVIL ENGINEER 1 -1 0
ELECTRICIAN/INSTRUMENTATION TECH 2 -2 0
LABORATORY ASSISTANT 1 -1 0
LABORATORY TECHNICIAN 3 -3 0
MAINTENANCE WORKER TRAINEE 2 -2 0
POWER PROD. OPERATOR II 2 -2 0
SR. WASTEWATER ELECTRICIAN 1 -1 0
SR. WASTEWATER MECHANIC 2 -2 0
SR. WASTEWATER OPERATOR 4 -4 0
TREATMENT PLANT ELECTRICIAN 2 -2 0
WASTEWATER MECHANIC II 9 -9 0
WASTEWATER OPERATOR II 12 -12 0
WASTEWATER OPERATOR III 6 -6 0
WASTEWATER TREATMENT TOTAL 49 0 49
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TOTAL 439.5 0 439.5
GRAND TOTAL 753.25 0 753.25
588

MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING -

EMPLOYEE BARGAINING UNITS
Presented to: City Council
Steve Naveau, Human Resources Director
Mike More, Human Resources Manager
July 28, 2022
589
• Purpose
• To adopt successor Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) with the following bargaining units:
• International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE)
• Service Employees International Union (SEIU)
• Oxnard Peace Officers Association (OPOA)
• Executive and Unrepresented (via resolution)
• To adopt resolutions approving the new classification & compensation structure and to modify the position control schedule accordingly BACKGROUND 2
590
• Class and Compensation Study
• Cost of Living Adjustments (COLAs)
• Medical Plan Contributions
• Bargaining-unit specific issues
ISSUES ADDRESSED DURING BARGAINING 3
591
• Class and Comp Study (IUOE/SEIU/Executive & Unrepresented) • Purpose of the study is to create a broad class system with compensation set using both the external market and internal equity for like type work. • The last time such a study was conducted was over 25 years ago • Provides the City with ability to ensure that employees are paid based on both internal equity and external market forces in the labor market • Cost of Living Adjustments (COLAs)
• It has been over seven years since employees’ salary ranges have received COLA adjustments.
• This has hindered the ability to recruit new talent to the organization, as a COLA is a standard component of public sector employee contracts.

ISSUES ADDRESSED DURING BARGAINING 4
592
• Medical Plan (IUOE/OPOA/SEIU/Executive & Unrepresented) • Philosophy – The City should contribute money to a medical insurance plan so that coverage is affordable & treat all bargaining groups the same • Intent is to provide sufficient dollar to allow employees to cover a family in at least one medical plan option
• City contribution should keep pace with annual increases to maintain affordability
• The medical plan should not be used to put cash directly into employee pockets
• Cash back when electing medical coverage
• Cash for waiving coverage
ISSUES ADDRESSED DURING BARGAINING 5
593
Medical Plan
• The City will establish a two level medical plan whereby Level One may only consist of employees who were employed with the City prior to January 1, 2023.
• All employees hired on or after January 1, 2023 shall only be eligible for the medical benefits described under Level Two.
• Level One – The City’s contribution is frozen at this level as well as the “waive” which is what the employee receives for not taking coverage. • Level Two - Employees who begin their employment with the City after January 1, 2023, or current employees who make any changes to their health care plan be placed into the Level Two medical plan. • Single, Single plus One, and Family Plan – City contribution change is effective the first full pay period in January of the year specified • 2023 – City contribution will increase by $231 per month to $1,774 • 2024 – City contribution will increase by 5% to $1,863 per month • 2025 – City contribution will increase by 5% to $1,956 per month • Employees who waive coverage will receive $500 cash back • Employees who opt for medical coverage receive no cash back COMMON PROVISIONS 6
594
COLAs
• IUOE, SEIU, Executive & Unrepresented
• 3% FY 22-23
• 3% FY 23-24
• 3% FY 24-25
• OPOA
• 0% FY 21-22
• 5% FY 22-23
• 5% FY 23-24
Class & Compensation (except OPOA)
• No instant increase
• Employees moved into range and advance through COLAs and annual wage adjustments
• For employees still projected to be below range by then end of the contract term, they will be provided an increase to get to the minimum of the proposed ranges
• IUOE: June 2025
• SEIU: January 2024
COMMON PROVISIONS (CONT) 7
595
IUOE
• Standby Pay - Increases the standby rate from $2 to $3 per hour. • Tool Allowance - increases the tool allowance for equipment mechanics by $75 each year up to a total of $1,025 per year. • Vacation Accrual - Increase of 8 hours annually per employee with a direct offset of the elimination of a floating holiday.

BARGAINING-UNIT SPECIFIC ISSUES 8
596
Executive & Unrepresented
• Severance Pay - up to $75,000 authorized by the City Manager & City Attorney as warranted (unless breaking law or policy) • Moving Expense Reimbursement - up to a maximum of $10,000 to assist with recruitment of potential candidates covered under the resolution.
• Establishment of a Retiree Health Savings Plan (RHS) – The executive and unrepresented staff will eliminate the $500 per year wellness benefit in exchange for the City making a 1% contribution towards an RHS plan. The RHS plan will provide funds to employees to use in retirement for health-related costs.

BARGAINING-UNIT SPECIFIC ISSUES 9
597
OPOA
• Roll-up of percentage-based add-pays: the City and OPOA agreed to eliminate the following percentage-based add-pays (max 22%) and instead “roll up” these add-pays into the salary ranges. • One-Time Cash Payments: In order to settle existing and potential litigation, the City has agreed to pay all members of OPOA a one-time cash payment of $4,000 each.
• Adjustment to Public Safety Dispatcher Ranges
• Tuition Reimbursement
BARGAINING-UNIT SPECIFIC ISSUES (CONT) 10
598
• The total estimated cost of this package for IUOE, OPOA, SEIU, and Executives for the upcoming 3-year period is $12,738,520 • 9.26% of total compensation / 3.09% per year
• General Fund impact totals $8,087,342 over the 3-year term • The first year of the OPOA agreement is FY 21-22 and there is zero cost.
• CFO estimates that for each fund and department impacted by the contracts, the City’s FY 2022-23 adopted budget has sufficient appropriations.
• Bargaining units still actively negotiating may create need for additional appropriations
FISCAL IMPACT 11
599
• The Labor Methodology illustrates the cost increase in each year independently as a percentage of base compensation.
• The Budget Methodology compounds the increased cost over the term of the entire contract as a percentage of base compensation.

FISCAL IMPACT (CONT) 12
600

QUESTIONS
13 601

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

REPORTS
AGENDA ITEM NO. M.3
DATE: July 28, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Steve Naveau, Human Resources Director, (805) 385-7947, [email protected] SUBJECT: Memorandum of Understanding - Oxnard Mid-Managers Association. (0/10/5)

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council of the City of Oxnard adopt the following resolutions:

1. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Oxnard approving the successor Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Oxnard and the Oxnard Mid-Managers Association and authorizing the City Manager or designee to take the necessary administrative actions to implement the agreement,

2. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Oxnard amending Resolution number 15,594 authorizing and approving the classification and salary schedule pursuant to Chapter 4 of the City Personnel Rules and Regulations, and

3. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Oxnard amending Resolution number 15,593 authorizing full time equivalent positions pursuant to Chapter 4 of the City Personnel Rules and Regulations.

Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video:
https://youtu.be/NW7_cfE6Uxo

BACKGROUND
The attached resolutions contain the new terms and conditions of employment with the Oxnard Mid-Managers Association (OMMA), which represents approximately 140 employees (but covers approximately 200 positions) performing management and professional work.

Negotiations with OMMA took place over the last five months, the results of which included changes the City was asking to make in the health benefit, the implementation of the class and compensation study, cost of living adjustments, and the establishment of a Retiree Health Savings Plan (RHS), the details of which are discussed below.

Health Benefit
In the most recent 2018 bargaining unit contracts, the City took the step to increase the City’s contribution towards medical coverage. Prior to this change, it had been over ten years since the City had last made a change to this benefit, which left it severely lagging in the marketplace. The changes being recommended include an increase in the City’s contribution of 15% in the first year and 5% for each subsequent year in each year of the contracts, with the intent of providing a sufficient increase to cover a family plan in at least one medical plan option. These increases will help maintain a competitive position in the marketplace.
602
Currently, employees may receive cash payments related to their medical benefits in one of two ways: waive or cash back. The “waive” occurs when employees who are enrolled in medical coverage outside of the City can, with proof of credible coverage, receive the City contribution rather than the health benefit from the City. “Cash back” occurs when an employee enrolls in a medical plan with a premium less than the City contribution and then receives the excess contribution as cash.

Although the City is proposing to make increases in the contribution, it is decreasing cash back and waive amounts. To implement these changes, the City will create a two-level system for medical contributions which is intended to slowly wean employees off of the “waive” and “cash back” payments. New employees or employees who make changes in their medical plans will immediately move to the plan level that does not have any “cash back” payments and reduces the “waive” payment from $1,243 to $500. By reducing the payments employees receive from the “waive” and eliminating the “cash back,” the City is able to repurpose this money back into the plan, which offsets the City increasing its contribution towards the plan premiums. Also, this more clearly aligns with the purpose of the City providing affordable health care rather than unintended supplemental cash payments to City employees.

Classification and Compensation Study Implementation
Over six years ago, the City had an audit completed on the internal service departments, which led to over 100+ recommendations intended to move the internal departments to be capable of providing higher-quality services to the operating departments. One of these recommendations for the Human Resource Department was to implement a classification and compensation study.

The last time such a study was conducted was over 25 years ago. As a general rule, agencies want these studies to be done approximately every ten years. This study looked at the City’s classification structure as well as the competitiveness of its salary structure. The results of the study included a broad classification system, which is helpful for employee career development by providing a career track progression, while at the same time making it easier for management to understand and administer the classification structure. Through the study, the City is also able to ensure that employees are paid based on both internal equity, meaning the value the job holds across the organization, and external market forces in the labor market.

Rather than immediately increasing employees’ salaries to the new range, OMMA agreed to the new classification ranges applying over time. As employees receive their cost of living adjustments (described below) and five percent annual increases, their salaries will come into the new ranges. For some employees below the new range, it may take until the end of the proposed contract term to reach the new range. Under the terms of the MOU, employees in the OMMA bargaining group will all be brought into the salary range by the end of the contract in June 2025 by the amount that it takes to move the employee into his or her individual range. This approach reduced the immediate financial impact to the City and allowed for cost of living adjustments for employees.

Cost of Living Adjustment
The City and OMMA have agreed to a 3% salary adjustment per year, also known as a cost of living adjustment (COLA) for all employees. It has been over seven years since employees’ salary ranges have received COLA adjustments due to the condition of the City’s finances. This has hindered the ability to recruit new talent to the organization, as a COLA is a standard component of public sector employee contracts and in a survey of the public agencies in Ventura County, including the County itself, there was a range of COLAs up to 4%. The City believes that a 3% COLA is appropriate and timely given the economic climate.

Retiree Health Savings Plan (RHS)
603
OMMA agreed to eliminate the $500 per year wellness benefit in exchange for the City making a 1% contribution towards an RHS plan. The RHS plan will provide funds to employees to use in retirement for health-related costs.

Fiscal Impact
The total estimated cost of this package for OMMA for the upcoming 3-year period is $2,899,064. This amounts to approximately 11.02% of total compensation, or 3.67% per year. Of this total amount, the impact on the City’s General Fund totals $1,309,405 over the 3-year term.

Description Fund FY 2022-23 Total 3-Years
General Fund 101 $499,538 $1,309,405
Measure O 104 $4,721 $5.902
Water 601 $90,058 $234.907
Wastewater 611,621 $107,165 $279.530
Environmental Resources 631 $107,639 $280,767
Internal Service Funds 701, 702, 725, 731, 735, 741 $157,224 $410,102 Other Funds $145,089 $378,451
Estimated Total $1,111,434 $2,899,064
Labor Costing Methodology vs. Budget Methodology
As staff has shown in prior MOU-related agenda reports, the financial impact may be depicted in two ways. One is a year over year cost increase, which is what is used predominantly in the labor relations field. There are jurisdictions within Ventura County that depict their employee costs in this manner. This methodology shows what the increased cost is as compared with the previous year. Using this methodology, the impact in Year 1 will be $1,111,434, the impact in Year 2 will be an additional $869,831, and the impact in Year 3 will be a further $917,800, for a total impact of $2,899,064, as shown in the chart below.

The other methodology is more common for budget and finance professionals, who compare all of the financial costs of that contract to the year before the contract becomes effective (Base Year). This methodology compounds the increased costs over the term of the entire contract. In the case of the resolution presented here, this would be comparing the increase in costs in Year 1 to the budgeted cost of the group in the Base Year, the increase in costs in Year 2 to the budgeted cost of the group still in the Base Year, and the increase in costs in Year 3 to the budgeted cost of the group once again in the Base Year. Using this methodology, the budget impact in Year 1 will be $1,111,434, the impact in Year 604
2 will be $1,981,264, and the impact in Year 3 will be $2,899,064, for a total, cumulative 3-year impact of $5,991,762, as shown in the chart below.

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item is a routine operational item or does not relate to the five strategic priorities adopted by City Council on March 16, 2021.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Staff estimates that for each fund and department impacted by the tentatively-agreed MOU, the City’s FY 2022-23 adopted budget has sufficient appropriations. Once bargaining units still actively negotiating (IAFF and OPSMA) reach tentative agreements, additional appropriations may be needed.

COMMITTEE OUTCOME
This item did not originate in Committee.

Prepared by: Steve Naveau, Human Resources Director

ATTACHMENTS

1. Attachment No 1 - OMMA Resolution

2. Attachment No 2 - Salary Schedule Resolution

3. Attachment No 3 - Position Control Resolution

4. Attachment No 4 - CC Presentation
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD
RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 15,594 AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY SCHEDULES PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 4 OF THE CITY PERSONNEL RULES AND

REGULATIONS
WHEREAS, Chapter 4, Article 4.5 of the City of Oxnard Personnel Rules and Regulations requires that the City of Oxnard classification listing all classes of positions in the general city service be established by resolution of the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, Chapter 4, Article 4.7 of the City of Oxnard Personnel Rules and Regulations provides that the City Manager from time to time may revise the number of positions in each classification as necessary to perform the work of the classification, provided that the total expense to be incurred for such work shall be limited to the amount appropriated by the City Council for the classification; and,
WHEREAS, Chapter 4, Article 4.8 of the City of Oxnard Personnel Rules and Regulations provides that the City Manager shall recommend to the City Council the creation of a new or additional position allocated to an existing class whenever possible; otherwise, the City Manager shall recommend to the City Council the creation of a new classification; and, WHEREAS, Chapter 4, Article 4.9 of the City of Oxnard Personnel Rules and Regulations requires City Council approval to establish a new classification title and salary range attached as Attachment A of this resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Oxnard resolves to amend Exhibit “A” of Resolution No. 15,594 in accordance with Chapter 4, Articles 4.5, 4.7, 4.8 and 4.9 of the City of Oxnard Personnel Rules and Regulations, by adding the following classifications and establishing salary ranges for those classifications effective August 6, 2022.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of July 2022, by the following vote:

YES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN
_________________
John C. Zaragoza, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Rose Chaparro, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Stephen M. Fischer, City Attorney
615

ATTACHMENT A

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
616

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Administrative Legal Secretary S15 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.4652 32.5182
BIWEEKLY 1317.22 2601.46
ANNUAL 34247.62 67637.86
Administrative Services Administrator / Supervisor O25 Lower Upper Hourly 29.5166 61.4702
BIWEEKLY 2361.33 4917.62
ANNUAL 61394.53 127858.02
Administrative Services Analyst O15 Lower Upper
Hourly 26.1364 53.1546
BIWEEKLY 2090.91 4252.37
ANNUAL 54363.71 110561.57
Administrative Services Analyst, Senior O20 Lower Upper Hourly 30.4269 56.6865
BIWEEKLY 2434.15 4534.92
ANNUAL 63287.95 117907.92
Administrative Services Coordinator / Support Supervisor S30 Lower Upper Hourly 21.1618 41.3294
BIWEEKLY 1692.94 3306.35
ANNUAL 44016.54 85965.15
Administrative Services Manager O40 Lower Upper
Hourly 48.8838 78.2141
BIWEEKLY 3910.70 6257.13
ANNUAL 101678.30 162685.33
Administrative Services Specialist S15 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.4652 32.5182
BIWEEKLY 1317.22 2601.46
ANNUAL 34247.62 67637.86
Administrative Services Specialist, Senior S25 Lower Upper Hourly 22.4467 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1795.74 2989.78
ANNUAL 46689.14 77734.18
617

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Administrative Services Technician S10 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2291 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1218.33 2343.35
ANNUAL 31676.53 60927.15
Administrative Services Technician, Senior S05 Lower Upper Hourly 16.0730 30.7791
BIWEEKLY 1285.84 2462.33
ANNUAL 33431.84 64020.53
Animal Safety Officer I05 Lower Upper
Hourly 18.0625 30.7791
BIWEEKLY 1445.00 2462.33
ANNUAL 37570.00 64020.53
Animal Safety Officer, Senior I25 Lower Upper
Hourly 21.9311 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1754.49 2989.78
ANNUAL 45616.69 77734.18
Assistant City Clerk O03 Lower Upper
Hourly 28.0651 46.1371
BIWEEKLY 2245.21 3690.97
ANNUAL 58375.41 95965.17
Assistant City Manager E19 Lower Upper
Hourly 78.7151 133.8157
BIWEEKLY 6297.21 10705.26
ANNUAL 163727.41 278336.66
Assistant City Treasurer / Department Director 1 E04 Lower Upper Hourly 62.1611 105.6738
BIWEEKLY 4972.89 8453.90
ANNUAL 129295.09 219801.50
Assistant Department Director I O55 Lower Upper
Hourly 56.2445 89.9913
BIWEEKLY 4499.56 7199.30
ANNUAL 116988.56 187181.90
Assistant Department Director II O60 Lower Upper
Hourly 58.5976 93.7561
BIWEEKLY 4687.81 7500.49
ANNUAL 121883.01 195012.69
618

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Assistant Director of Utilities O65 Lower Upper
Hourly 61.0491 97.678
BIWEEKLY 4883.93 7814.24
ANNUAL 126982.13 203170.24
Assistant Engineer S45 Lower Upper
Hourly 34.5859 51.8788
BIWEEKLY 2766.87 4150.30
ANNUAL 71938.67 107907.90
Associate Engineer S50 Lower Upper
Hourly 33.9943 56.6625
BIWEEKLY 2719.54 4533.00
ANNUAL 70708.14 117858.00
Building / Construction Inspector I30 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.2671 41.3294
BIWEEKLY 2341.37 3306.35
ANNUAL 60875.57 85965.15
Building / Construction Inspector, Senior I40 Lower Upper Hourly 30.0473 45.0710
BIWEEKLY 2403.78 3605.68
ANNUAL 62498.38 93747.68
Chief Plant Operator O25 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.5166 61.4702
BIWEEKLY 2361.33 4917.62
ANNUAL 61394.53 127858.02
City Engineer O55 Lower Upper
Hourly 56.2445 89.9913
BIWEEKLY 4499.56 7199.30
ANNUAL 116988.56 187181.90
City Manager Executive Assistant O25 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.5166 61.4702
BIWEEKLY 2361.33 4917.62
ANNUAL 61394.53 127858.02
City Surveyor O15 Lower Upper
Hourly 26.1364 53.1546
BIWEEKLY 2090.91 4252.37
ANNUAL 54363.71 110561.57
619

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Civil Engineer S55 Lower Upper
Hourly 41.9516 62.9274
BIWEEKLY 3356.13 5034.19
ANNUAL 87259.33 130888.99
Code Compliance Inspector I25 Lower Upper
Hourly 21.9311 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1754.49 2989.78
ANNUAL 45616.69 77734.18
Community Paramedic I43 Lower Upper
Hourly 25.0829 45.0709
BIWEEKLY 2006.63 3605.67
ANNUAL 52172.43 93747.47
Construction Project Manager O25 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.5166 61.4702
BIWEEKLY 2361.33 4917.62
ANNUAL 61394.53 127858.02
Construction Project Manager, Senior O30 Lower Upper
Hourly 45.1567 67.7351
BIWEEKLY 3612.54 5418.81
ANNUAL 93925.94 140889.01
Cultural & Recreation Services Analyst O10 Lower Upper
Hourly 23.2415 49.8786
BIWEEKLY 1859.32 3990.29
ANNUAL 48342.32 103747.49
Cultural & Recreation Services Manager O35 Lower Upper
Hourly 41.9805 73.4012
BIWEEKLY 3358.44 5872.10
ANNUAL 87319.44 152674.50
Cultural & Recreation Services Specialist S15 Lower Upper Hourly 16.4652 32.5182
BIWEEKLY 1317.22 2601.46
ANNUAL 34247.62 67637.86
Cultural & Recreation Services Supervisor O25 Lower Upper Hourly 29.5166 61.4702
BIWEEKLY 2361.33 4917.62
ANNUAL 61394.53 127858.02
620

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Cultural & Recreation Services Technician S10 Lower Upper Hourly 15.2291 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1218.33 2343.35
ANNUAL 31676.53 60927.15
Cultural & Recreation Services Technician, Senior S05 Lower Upper Hourly 16.0730 30.7791
BIWEEKLY 1285.84 2462.33
ANNUAL 33431.84 64020.53
CUPA Manager O25 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.5166 61.4702
BIWEEKLY 2361.33 4917.62
ANNUAL 61394.53 127858.02
Deputy City Manager E26 Lower Upper
Hourly 72.3149 122.9354
BIWEEKLY 5785.19 9834.83
ANNUAL 150414.99 255705.63
Electrician I20 Lower Upper
Hourly 24.6523 34.5131
BIWEEKLY 1972.18 2761.05
ANNUAL 51276.78 71787.25
Emergency Communications Call Taker S10 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2291 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1218.33 2343.35
ANNUAL 31676.53 60927.15
Emergency Services Manager O25 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.5166 61.4702
BIWEEKLY 2361.33 4917.62
ANNUAL 61394.53 127858.02
EMS Coordinator O25 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.5166 61.4702
BIWEEKLY 2361.33 4917.62
ANNUAL 61394.53 127858.02
Engineer Division Manager O45 Lower Upper
Hourly 52.0518 83.2830
BIWEEKLY 4164.14 6662.64
ANNUAL 108267.74 173228.64
621

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Engineering Technician S25 Lower Upper
Hourly 22.4467 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1795.74 2989.78
ANNUAL 46689.14 77734.18
Engineering Technician Supervisor S35 Lower Upper
Hourly 27.6286 45.0709
BIWEEKLY 2210.29 3605.67
ANNUAL 57467.49 93747.47
Fire Chief E07 Lower Upper
Hourly 69.4952 117.7884
BIWEEKLY 5559.62 9423.07
ANNUAL 144550.02 244999.87
Fleet Services Mechanic I25 Lower Upper
Hourly 21.9311 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1754.49 2989.78
ANNUAL 45616.69 77734.18
Fleet Services Mechanic, Senior I30 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.2671 41.3294
BIWEEKLY 2341.37 3306.35
ANNUAL 60875.57 85965.15
Fleet Services Mechanic Supervisor O05 Lower Upper
Hourly 28.0651 46.1371
BIWEEKLY 2245.21 3690.97
ANNUAL 58375.41 95965.17
Fleet Services Superintendent O10 Lower Upper
Hourly 23.2415 49.8786
BIWEEKLY 1859.32 3990.29
ANNUAL 48342.32 103747.49
Fleet Services Technician I10 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.2711 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1301.69 2343.35
ANNUAL 33843.89 60927.15
Fleet Services Worker I00 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.7642 28.0653
BIWEEKLY 1341.14 2245.22
ANNUAL 34869.54 58375.82
622

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
HVAC Mechanic I20 Lower Upper
Hourly 24.6523 34.5131
BIWEEKLY 1972.18 2761.05
ANNUAL 51276.78 71787.25
Information Technology Analyst O20 Lower Upper
Hourly 30.4269 56.6865
BIWEEKLY 2434.15 4534.92
ANNUAL 63287.95 117907.92
Information Technology Analyst, Senior O25 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.5166 61.4702
BIWEEKLY 2361.33 4917.62
ANNUAL 61394.53 127858.02
Information Technology Manager O40 Lower Upper
Hourly 48.8838 78.2141
BIWEEKLY 3910.70 6257.13
ANNUAL 101678.30 162685.33
Information Technology Specialist S20 Lower Upper
Hourly 24.6522 34.5131
BIWEEKLY 1972.18 2761.05
ANNUAL 51276.58 71787.25
Information Technology Supervisor O30 Lower Upper
Hourly 45.1567 67.7351
BIWEEKLY 3612.54 5418.81
ANNUAL 93925.94 140889.01
Information Technology Technician S10 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2291 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1218.33 2343.35
ANNUAL 31676.53 60927.15
Inspections / Code Compliance Administrator O25 Lower Upper Hourly 29.5166 61.4702
BIWEEKLY 2361.33 4917.62
ANNUAL 61394.53 127858.02
Inspections Field Supervisor O10 Lower Upper
Hourly 23.2415 49.8786
BIWEEKLY 1859.32 3990.29
ANNUAL 48342.32 103747.49
623

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Laboratory Scientist O15 Lower Upper
Hourly 26.1364 53.1546
BIWEEKLY 2090.91 4252.37
ANNUAL 54363.71 110561.57
Laboratory Scientist Manager O25 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.5166 61.4702
BIWEEKLY 2361.33 4917.62
ANNUAL 61394.53 127858.02
Laboratory Specialist S25 Lower Upper
Hourly 22.4467 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1795.74 2989.78
ANNUAL 46689.14 77734.18
Landscape Architect O20 Lower Upper
Hourly 30.4269 56.6865
BIWEEKLY 2434.15 4534.92
ANNUAL 63287.95 117907.92
Law Office Manager O25 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.5166 61.4702
BIWEEKLY 2361.33 4917.62
ANNUAL 61394.53 127858.02
Librarian S25 Lower Upper
Hourly 22.4467 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1795.74 2989.78
ANNUAL 46689.14 77734.18
Librarian, Senior S30 Lower Upper
Hourly 21.1618 41.3294
BIWEEKLY 1692.94 3306.35
ANNUAL 44016.54 85965.15
Library Manager O35 Lower Upper
Hourly 41.9805 73.4012
BIWEEKLY 3358.44 5872.10
ANNUAL 87319.44 152674.50
Library Monitor S00 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2484 28.0653
BIWEEKLY 1219.87 2245.22
ANNUAL 31716.67 58375.82
624

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Library Services Supervisor O10 Lower Upper
Hourly 23.2415 49.8786
BIWEEKLY 1859.32 3990.29
ANNUAL 48342.32 103747.49
Library Technician S10 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2291 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1218.33 2343.35
ANNUAL 31676.53 60927.15
Library Technician, Senior S05 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.0730 30.7791
BIWEEKLY 1285.84 2462.33
ANNUAL 33431.84 64020.53
Literacy Program Analyst O15 Lower Upper
Hourly 26.1364 53.1546
BIWEEKLY 2090.91 4252.37
ANNUAL 54363.71 110561.57
Maintenance Crew Supervisor O05 Lower Upper
Hourly 28.0651 46.1371
BIWEEKLY 2245.21 3690.97
ANNUAL 58375.41 95965.17
Maintenance & Operations Manager O50 Lower Upper
Hourly 52.0518 85.1051
BIWEEKLY 4164.14 6808.41
ANNUAL 108267.74 177018.61
Maintenance & Operations Superintendent O25 Lower Upper Hourly 29.5166 61.4702
BIWEEKLY 2361.33 4917.62
ANNUAL 61394.53 127858.02
Maintenance Specialist I15 Lower Upper
Hourly 18.8905 32.5182
BIWEEKLY 1511.24 2601.46
ANNUAL 39292.24 67637.86
Maintenance Specialist, Senior I25 Lower Upper
Hourly 21.9311 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1754.49 2989.78
ANNUAL 45616.69 77734.18
625

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Maintenance Technician I10 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.2711 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1301.69 2343.35
ANNUAL 33843.89 60927.15
Maintenance Technician, Senior I05 Lower Upper
Hourly 18.0625 30.7791
BIWEEKLY 1445.00 2462.33
ANNUAL 37570.00 64020.53
Maintenance Worker I00 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.7642 28.0653
BIWEEKLY 1341.14 2245.22
ANNUAL 34869.54 58375.82
Paralegal S42 Lower Upper
Hourly 32.9551 46.1371
BIWEEKLY 2636.41 3690.97
ANNUAL 68546.61 95965.17
Permit Coordinator O15 Lower Upper
Hourly 26.1364 53.1546
BIWEEKLY 2090.91 4252.37
ANNUAL 54363.71 110561.57
Permit Technician S25 Lower Upper
Hourly 22.4467 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1795.74 2989.78
ANNUAL 46689.14 77734.18
Planner S40 Lower Upper
Hourly 32.2313 48.3469
BIWEEKLY 2578.50 3867.75
ANNUAL 67041.10 100561.55
Planner, Assistant S35 Lower Upper
Hourly 27.6286 45.0709
BIWEEKLY 2210.29 3605.67
ANNUAL 57467.49 93747.47
Planning Manager O40 Lower Upper
Hourly 48.8838 78.2141
BIWEEKLY 3910.70 6257.13
ANNUAL 101678.30 162685.33
626

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Planning Supervisor O25 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.5166 61.4702
BIWEEKLY 2361.33 4917.62
ANNUAL 61394.53 127858.02
Plans Examiner S30 Lower Upper
Hourly 21.1618 41.3294
BIWEEKLY 1692.94 3306.35
ANNUAL 44016.54 85965.15
Plant Maintenance Specialist I25 Lower Upper
Hourly 21.9311 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1754.49 2989.78
ANNUAL 45616.69 77734.18
Plant Maintenance Specialist, Senior I30 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.2671 41.3294
BIWEEKLY 2341.37 3306.35
ANNUAL 60875.57 85965.15
Plant Maintenance Superintendent O25 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.5166 61.4702
BIWEEKLY 2361.33 4917.62
ANNUAL 61394.53 127858.02
Plant Maintenance Supervisor O05 Lower Upper
Hourly 28.0651 46.1371
BIWEEKLY 2245.21 3690.97
ANNUAL 58375.41 95965.17
Plant Operations Manager O35 Lower Upper
Hourly 41.9805 73.4012
BIWEEKLY 3358.44 5872.10
ANNUAL 87319.44 152674.50
Plant Operations Shift Coordinator I45 Lower Upper
Hourly 34.5859 51.8788
BIWEEKLY 2766.87 4150.30
ANNUAL 71938.67 107907.90
Plant Operator I15 Lower Upper
Hourly 18.8905 32.5182
BIWEEKLY 1511.24 2601.46
ANNUAL 39292.24 67637.86
627

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Plant Operator, Principal I35 Lower Upper
Hourly 28.6905 43.2524
BIWEEKLY 2295.24 3460.19
ANNUAL 59676.24 89964.99
Plant Operator, Senior I20 Lower Upper
Hourly 24.6523 34.5131
BIWEEKLY 1972.18 2761.05
ANNUAL 51276.78 71787.25
Plant Operator Trainee I10 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.2711 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1301.69 2343.35
ANNUAL 33843.89 60927.15
Police Corporal P02 Lower Upper
Hourly 47.0861 61.9370
BIWEEKLY 3766.89 4954.96
ANNUAL 97939.09 128828.96
Police Officer I / II P01 Lower Upper
Hourly 34.9341 54.6567
BIWEEKLY 2794.73 4372.54
ANNUAL 72662.93 113685.94
Police Sergeant P03 Lower Upper
Hourly 47.0861 71.2274
BIWEEKLY 3766.89 5698.19
ANNUAL 97939.09 148152.99
Police Service Officer P04 Lower Upper
Hourly 30.3134 47.4270
BIWEEKLY 2425.07 3794.16
ANNUAL 63051.87 98648.16
Police Records Supervisor O05 Lower Upper
Hourly 28.0651 46.1371
BIWEEKLY 2245.21 3690.97
ANNUAL 58375.41 95965.17
628

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Police Records Technician S10 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2291 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1218.33 2343.35
ANNUAL 31676.53 60927.15
Police Records Technician, Senior S05 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.0730 30.7791
BIWEEKLY 1285.84 2462.33
ANNUAL 33431.84 64020.53
Property and Evidence Supervisor O00 Lower Upper
Hourly 27.0277 42.1799
BIWEEKLY 2162.22 3374.39
ANNUAL 56217.62 87734.19
Property and Evidence Technician S10 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2291 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1218.33 2343.35
ANNUAL 31676.53 60927.15
Property and Records Manager O25 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.5166 61.4702
BIWEEKLY 2361.33 4917.62
ANNUAL 61394.53 127858.02
Public Safety Analyst S35 Lower Upper
Hourly 27.6286 45.0709
BIWEEKLY 2210.29 3605.67
ANNUAL 57467.49 93747.47
Public Safety Analyst, Senior S45 Lower Upper
Hourly 34.5859 51.8788
BIWEEKLY 2766.87 4150.30
ANNUAL 71938.67 107907.90
Public Safety Communications Manager O40 Lower Upper
Hourly 48.8838 78.2141
BIWEEKLY 3910.70 6257.13
ANNUAL 101678.30 162685.33
Public Safety Dispatcher I P07 Lower Upper
Hourly 25.8976 40.0201
BIWEEKLY 2071.81 3201.61
ANNUAL 53867.01 83241.81
629

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Public Safety Dispatcher II P08 Lower Upper
Hourly 27.2188 44.0221
BIWEEKLY 2177.50 3521.77
ANNUAL 56615.10 91565.97
Public Safety Dispatcher III P09 Lower Upper
Hourly 36.8844 51.5059
BIWEEKLY 2950.75 4120.47
ANNUAL 76719.55 107132.27
Public Safety Field Assistant S00 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2484 28.0653
BIWEEKLY 1219.87 2245.22
ANNUAL 31716.67 58375.82
Public Safety Field Technician S10 Lower Upper
Hourly 15.2291 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1218.33 2343.35
ANNUAL 31676.53 60927.15
Public Safety Field Technician, Senior S05 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.0730 30.7791
BIWEEKLY 1285.84 2462.33
ANNUAL 33431.84 64020.53
Public Safety Investigative Specialist S15 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.4652 32.5182
BIWEEKLY 1317.22 2601.46
ANNUAL 34247.62 67637.86
Public Safety Investigative Specialist, Senior S25 Lower Upper Hourly 22.4467 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1795.74 2989.78
ANNUAL 46689.14 77734.18
Senior Advisor O45 Lower Upper
Hourly 52.0518 83.2830
BIWEEKLY 4164.14 6662.64
ANNUAL 108267.74 173228.64
Senior Engineer S60 Lower Upper
Hourly 45.8790 73.4064
BIWEEKLY 3670.32 5872.51
ANNUAL 95428.32 152685.31
630

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Special Districts Manager O35 Lower Upper
Hourly 41.9805 73.4012
BIWEEKLY 3358.44 5872.10
ANNUAL 87319.44 152674.50
Sr. Police Service Officer P05 Lower Upper
Hourly 38.7119 52.1693
BIWEEKLY 3096.95 4173.54
ANNUAL 80520.75 108512.14
Survey Party Chief I25 Lower Upper
Hourly 21.9311 37.3722
BIWEEKLY 1754.49 2989.78
ANNUAL 45616.69 77734.18
Utilities Field Specialist I15 Lower Upper
Hourly 18.8905 32.5182
BIWEEKLY 1511.24 2601.46
ANNUAL 39292.24 67637.86
Utilities Field Superintendent O25 Lower Upper
Hourly 29.5166 61.4702
BIWEEKLY 2361.33 4917.62
ANNUAL 61394.53 127858.02
Utilities Field Supervisor I31 Lower Upper
Hourly 27.0277 42.1799
BIWEEKLY 2162.22 3374.39
ANNUAL 56217.62 87734.19
Utilities Field Technician I10 Lower Upper
Hourly 16.2711 29.2919
BIWEEKLY 1301.69 2343.35
ANNUAL 33843.89 60927.15
Utilities Field Technician, Senior I05 Lower Upper
Hourly 18.0625 30.7791
BIWEEKLY 1445.00 2462.33
ANNUAL 37570.00 64020.53
Utilities Manager O50 Lower Upper
Hourly 52.0518 85.1051
BIWEEKLY 4164.14 6808.41
ANNUAL 108267.74 177018.61
631

CITY OF OXNARD

CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LISTING
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 06, 2022
Utilities Technical Services Analyst O15 Lower Upper
Hourly 26.1364 53.1546
BIWEEKLY 2090.91 4252.37
ANNUAL 54363.71 110561.57
Utilities Technical Services Analyst, Senior O20 Lower Upper Hourly 30.4269 56.6865
BIWEEKLY 2434.15 4534.92
ANNUAL 63287.95 117907.92
Utilities Technical Services Coordinator I30 Lower Upper Hourly 29.2671 41.3294
BIWEEKLY 2341.37 3306.35
ANNUAL 60875.57 85965.15
Utilities Technical Services Manager O30 Lower Upper
Hourly 45.1567 67.7351
BIWEEKLY 3612.54 5418.81
ANNUAL 93925.94 140889.01
Utilities Technical Services Specialist I15 Lower Upper Hourly 18.8905 32.5182
BIWEEKLY 1511.24 2601.46
ANNUAL 39292.24 67637.86
Utilities Technical Services Specialist, Senior I20 Lower Upper Hourly 24.6523 34.5131
BIWEEKLY 1972.18 2761.05
ANNUAL 51276.78 71787.25
632

CITY COUNCIL OF THECITY OF OXNARD
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 15,593 AUTHORIZING FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 4 OF THE CITY PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS WHEREAS.Chapter 4, Section 4.7 oftheCity of Oxnard Personnel Rules and Regulations providesthat the City Manager from time to time may revise the number of positions in each classification as necessary to perform the work of the classification, provided that the total expense to be incurred forsuch work shall be limited to the amount appropriated by the City Council forthe classification: and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the revisions attached as Attachment A of this resolution and finds that they are desirable and in the interest of maintaining an efficient municipal organization.

NOW, THEREFORE. the City Council of the City of Oxnard resolves to amend Resolution No. 15,593 with the following changes to the adopted FY 22/23 position allocations as specified, subject to approval of a budget appropriation for the revised allocation.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of July 2022, by the following vote:

YES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

John C. Zaragoza, Mayor
ATTEST:

Rose Chaparro, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Stephen M. Fischer, City Attorney
633

ATTACHMENT A

POSITION CONTROL LISTING
634
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation

CITY ATTORNEY
ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SECRETARY ( C ) 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SECRETARY I 1 -1 0
CITY ATTORNEY DEPT TOTAL 1 0 1

CITY CLERK
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 1 -1 0
CITY CLERK DEPT TOTAL 1 0 1

CITY COUNCIL
CITY MANAGER EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT ( C ) 0 1 1
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT II 1 -1 0
CITY COUNCIL TOTAL 1 0 1

CITY MANAGER
ADMINISTATIVE SERVICES MANAGER 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR/SUPERVISOR 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST 0 4 4
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST, SENIOR 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR ( C ) 0 1 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
CITY MANAGER EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT ( C ) 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (C) 1 -1 0
COMMUNICATIONS COORDINATOR 2 -2 0
COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING MANAGER 1 -1 0
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT II 1 -1 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST II (PUBLIC RECODS ADVOCATE) 1 -1 0
PROJECT MANAGER 4 -4 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 1 -1 0
CITY MANAGER DEPT TOTAL 11 0 11

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 2 2 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 3 3
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 0 3 3
BUILDING/CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR 0 8 8
BUILDING/CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR, SENIOR 0 4 4
CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR 0 7 7
ENGINEER DIVISION MANAGER 0 2 2
INSPECTIONS/CODE COMPLIANCE ADMINISTRATOR 0 3 3
PLANS EXAMINER 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 2 -2 0
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 2 -2 0
BUILDING INSPECTOR II 5 -5 0
CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR II 7 -7 0
CODE COMPLIANCE MANAGER 1 -1 0
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 3 -3 0
DEPUTY BUILDING OFFICIAL 1 -1 0
ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR 1 -1 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 3 -3 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST I 1 -1 0
PLAN CHECK ENGINEER 3 -3 0
PLANS EXAMINER II 1 -1 0

635
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
SR. CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR 2 -2 0
SR. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR 1 -1 0
SUPERVISING BUILDING INSPECTOR 1 -1 0
SUPERVISING CIVIL ENGINEER 2 -2 0
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TOTAL 36 0 36

DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR/SUPERVISOR 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 2 2 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 1 1
ASSISTANT DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR II 0 1 1
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR II 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEV. 1 -1 0
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 1 -1 0
DRAFT/GRAPH TECHNICIAN II 1 -1 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST III 1 -1 0
DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT TOTAL 6 0 6

LAND USE PLAN & ENV PROTC
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
PLANNER 0 5 5
PLANNER, ASSISTANT 0 3 3
PLANNING MANAGER 0 2 2
PLANNING SUPERVISOR 0 4 4
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 1 -1 0
ASSISTANT PLANNER 3 -3 0
ASSOCIATE PLANNER 5 -5 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST I 1 -1 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 1 -1 0
PLAN & ENV SRVCS MANAGER 1 -1 0
PLANNING & SUSTAINABILITY MANAGER 1 -1 0
PRINCIPAL PLANNER 2 -2 0
SR. PLANNER 2 -2 0
LAND USE PLAN & ENV PROTC TOTAL 17 0 17
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TOTAL 59 0 59

CULTURAL & COMMUNITY SERVICES

LIBRARY
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 1 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
LIBRARIAN 0 7 7
LIBRARIAN, SENIOR 0 4 4
LIBRARY MANAGER 0 1 1
LIBRARY TECHNICIAN 0 10.5 10.5
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1 -1 0
CITY LIBRARIAN 1 -1 0
LIBRARIAN I 6 -6 0
LIBRARIAN II 1 -1 0
LIBRARIAN III 4 -4 0
LIBRARY AIDE I 5.5 -5.5 0
LIBRARY AIDE II 5 -5 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 1 -1 0

636
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
LIBRARY SERVICES TOTAL 24.5 0 24.5

RECREATION SERVICES
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR/SUPERVISOR 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST, SENIOR 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 2 2 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 2 2
ASSISTANT DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR 1 0 1 1
CULTURAL & RECREATION SERVICES ANALYST 0 17 17
CULTURAL & RECREATION SERVICES MANAGER 0 2 2
CULTURAL & RECREATION SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 56.75 56.75 CULTURAL & RECREATION SERVICES SUPERVISOR 0 6 6
CULTURAL & RECREATION SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 2 2
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR I 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 2 -2 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
COMMUNITY SERVICES MANAGER 2 -2 0
CULTURAL & COMMUNITY SVCS DIR 1 -1 0
CULTURAL & COMMUNITY SVCS ASST. DIR 1 -1 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST I 2 -2 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 1 -1 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 2 -2 0
RECREATION SUPERVISOR 6 -6 0
RECREATION/HUMAN SERV COORD 17 -17 0
RECREATION/HUMAN SERV LEADER I 1 -1 0
RECREATION/HUMAN SERV LEADER II 1 -1 0
RECREATION/HUMAN SERV LEADER III 56.75 -56.75 0
RECREATION SERVICES TOTAL 94.75 0 94.75
CULTURAL & COMMUNITY SVCS TOTAL 119.25 0 119.25

DEPT OF BILLING AND LICENSING
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR/SUPERVISOR 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 10 10
CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR 0 1 1
ASSISTANT CITY TREASURER/DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR I 0 1 1
ACCOUNT CLERK I 1 -1 0
ACCOUNT CLERK II 2 -2 0
ACCOUNT CLERK III 1 -1 0
ASSITANT CITY TREASURER / DIR. REV & LIC 1 -1 0
BILLING & LICENSING SUPERVISOR 2 -2 0
CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR I 1 -1 0
CUSTOMER SERVICE ACCT TECH 2 -2 0
CUSTOMER SERVICE REP II 7 -7 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 1 -1 0
REVENUE COLLECTION TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
SR. CUSTOMER SERVICE REP 2 -2 0
DEPT OF BILLING AND LICENSING TOTAL 21 0 21

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

637
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR/SUPERVISOR 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST 0 14 14
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST LIMITED TERM (1/15/21-1/15/24) 0 1.5 1.5 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST LIMITED TERM (1/15/21-2/15/23) 0 0.5 0.5 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST, SENIOR 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR ( C ) 0 2 2 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER 0 4 4
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1.5 1.5
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 2 2
ASSISTANT DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR NRC I 0 2 2
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR II 0 1 1
ACCOUNT CLERK II 1 -1 0
ACCOUNT CLERK III 2 -2 0
ACCOUNTANT I 4 -4 0
ACCOUNTANT II 3 -3 0
ACCOUNTANT III 1 -1 0
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 2 -2 0
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (C) 2 -2 0
ASSISTANT CHIEF FIN OFFICER 2 -2 0
BUDGET MANAGER 1 -1 0
BUYER 3 -3 0
BUYER LIMITED TERM (1/15/21-2/15/23) 0.5 -0.5 0
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 1 -1 0
CONTROLLER 1 -1 0
FINANCIAL ANALYST I 1 -1 0
FINANCIAL ANALYST II 2 -2 0
FINANCIAL ANALYST III 2 -2 0
SENIOR MANAGER, INTERNAL CONTROL 1 -1 0
SR. BUYER 1 -1 0
MAIL CLERK 1.5 -1.5 0
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANT/AUDITOR 2 -2 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST LIMITED TERM (1/15/21-1/15/24) 1.5 -1.5 0 PURCHASING MANAGER 1 -1 0
FINANCE DEPARTMENT TOTAL 36.5 0 36.5

FIRE DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST, SENIOR 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR ( C ) 0 1 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER 0 1 1
CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR 0 4 4
PLANS EXAMINER 0 1 1
PUBLIC SAFETY INVESTIGATIVE SPECIALIST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (C) 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY II 2 -2 0
CRIME ANALYSIS DATA TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
FIRE FINANCIAL/GRANTS MANAGER 1 -1 0
FIRE INSPECTOR II (Non-Sworn) 4 -4 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 1 -1 0
PLANS EXAMINER II 1 -1 0

638
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL 11 0 11

HOUSING

HOUSING AUTHORITY
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR/SUPERVISOR 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST, SENIOR 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 3 3 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 7 7
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 8 8
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 6 6
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 1 1
ASSISTANT DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR I 0 2 2
CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR 0 1 1
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR II 0 1 1
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST, SENIOR 0 1 1
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDENT 0 1 1
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST 0 6 6
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 1 1
MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN 0 4 4
ACCOUNT CLERK III 1 -1 0
ACCOUNTANT I 2 -2 0
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 1 -1 0
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF HOUSING 1 -1 0
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT 1 -1 0
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT COORDINATOR 1 -1 0
COMPUTER NETWORK ENGINEER III 1 -1 0
DIRECTOR OF HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT 1 -1 0
FAC MAINT WORKER II 2 -2 0
GROUNDSWORKER I 1 -1 0
GROUNDSWORKER II 3 -3 0
HOUSING FINANCIAL OFFICER 1 -1 0
HOUSING INSPECTOR 1 -1 0
HOUSING MAINT SUPERVISOR 1 -1 0
HOUSING PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 2 -2 0
HOUSING PROGRAMS MANAGER 1 -1 0
HOUSING SPECIALIST I 5 -5 0
HOUSING SPECIALIST II 6 -6 0
MAINTENANCE WORKER HOUSING 4 -4 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 1 -1 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT I 2 -2 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 5 -5 0
PROJECT MANAGER 1 -1 0
RESIDENT SERVICES COORDINATOR 1 -1 0
SR. HOUSING MAINTENANCE WORKER 1 -1 0
SR. HOUSING SPECIALIST 3 -3 0
HOUSING AUTHORITY TOTAL 51 0 51

HOUSING SERVICES
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR/SUPERVISOR 0 4 4
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 3 3

639
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 1 1
PLANNING MANAGER 0 1 1
ACCOUNTING MANAGER 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
COMPLIANCE SERVICES MANAGER 1 -1 0
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER 1 -1 0
GRANTS COORDINATOR 1 -1 0
GRANTS SPECIALIST I 1 -1 0
HOMELESS ASSISTANCE PGM COORD 1 -1 0
HOMELESS PROGRAMS ASSISTANT 1 -1 0
HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM MANAGER 1 -1 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 1 -1 0
PROJECT MANAGER 1 -1 0
REHAB LOAN SPECIALIST 1 -1 0
HOUSING SERVICES TOTAL 13 0 13
HOUSING DEPARTMENT TOTAL 64 0 64

HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR/SUPERVISOR ( C ) 0 2 2 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST ( C ) 0 5 5
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST, SENIOR ( C ) 0 4 4
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR ( C ) 0 2 2 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER ( C ) 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST, SENIOR ( C ) 0 9 9
ASSISTANT DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR NRC I 0 1 1
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR I 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (C) 2 -2 0
ASSITANT HR DIRECTOR (C) 1 -1 0
HEALTH/SAFETY/TRAINING OFFICER 1 -1 0
HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST I (C) 2 -2 0
HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST II (C) 5 -5 0
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR 1 -1 0
HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER (C) 2 -2 0
HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN (C ) 7 -7 0
PAYROLL TECHNICIAN (C) 2 -2 0
PRINCIPAL HR ANALYST ( C ) 1 -1 0
SR. HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST (C) 2 -2 0
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT TOTAL 26 0 26

INFORMATION SVS OPERATION
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST, SENIOR 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 1 1 DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR I 0 1 1
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST 0 2 2
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST, SENIOR 0 9 9
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SPECIALIST 0 6 6
INOFRMATION TECHNOLGOY SUPERVISOR 0 3 3
DEPUTY CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER 1 1
INFO. TECHNOLOGY OFFICER I 2 2
INFO. TECHNOLOGY OFFICER II 2 2
PRINCIPAL INFO. TECH ANALYST 5 5
PRODUCTION SUPERVISOR 1 1
PRODUCTION TECHNICIAN 2 2

640
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
SR. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST 6 6
INFO. TECHNOLOGY DIRECTOR 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1 -1 0
COMPUTER NETWORK ENGINEER II 5 -5 0
COMPUTER NETWORK ENGINEER III 6 -6 0
GEOGRAPHIC INFO SYSTEMS TECH II 1 -1 0
GEOGRAPHIC INFO SYSTEMS TECH III 1 -1 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 1 -1 0
PROGRAMMER ANALYST 2 -2 0
PROJECT MANAGER 1 -1 0
SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR 3 -3 0
SYSTEMS ANALYST II 1 -1 0
SYSTEMS ANALYST III 1 -1 0
INFORMATION SVS OPERATION TOTAL 43 0 43

POLICE DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR/SUPERVISOR 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST, SENIOR 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR ( C ) 0 2 2 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST, SENIOR ( C ) 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 2 2
ANIMAL SAFETY OFFICER, SENIOR 0 1 1
POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN 0 21 21
POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 2 2
PROPERTY & EVIDENCE SUPERVISOR 0 1 1
PROPERTY & EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN 0 5 5
PROPERTY & RECORDS MANAGER 0 1 1
PUBLIC SAFETY ANALYST 0 3 3
PUBLIC SAFETY FIELD ASSISTANT 0 6 6
PUBLIC SAFETY FIELD TECHNICIAN 0 14 14
PUBLIC SAFETY FIELD TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 1 1
PUBLIC SAFETY INVESTIGATIVE SPECIALIST 0 14 14
PUBLIC SAFETY INVESTIGATIVE SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 3 3
ACCOUNT CLERK III 2 -2 0
ACCOUNTANT I 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (C) 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SVC'S ASSISTANT 2 -2 0
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS MANAGER 1 -1 0
COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER 10 -10 0
CRIME ANALYSIS DATA TECHNICIAN 2 -2 0
CRIME ANALYST I 2 -2 0
CRIME ANALYST II 1 -1 0
CROSSING GUARD 6 -6 0
EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN II 3 -3 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST III 1 -1 0
MISSING PERSONS SPECIALIST 1 -1 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 1 -1 0
POLICE FINANCIAL/GRANTS MANAGER 1 -1 0
POLICE RECORDS MANAGER 1 -1 0
POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN II 14 -14 0
POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN III 2 -2 0
POLICE WORD PROCESSOR II 7 -7 0

641
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
PROPERTY & EVIDENCE CUSTODIAN 1 -1 0
PROPERTY & EVIDENCE TECH II 5 -5 0
SEX REGISTRANT SPECIALIST 1 -1 0
SR. TRAFFIC SERVICE ASST 1 -1 0
SUPERVISING ANIMAL SAFETY OFFICER 1 -1 0
TRAFFIC SERVICE ASST II 14 -14 0
POLICE DEPARTMENT TOTAL 82 0 82

PUBLIC WORKS

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR/SUPERVISOR 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST, SENIOR 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 3 3 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 18 18
ELECTRICIAN 0 1 1
FLEET SERVICES MECHANIC 0 3 3
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS MANAGER 0 1 1
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDENT 0 2 2
MAINTENANCE CREW SUPERVISOR 0 7 7
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST 0 14 14
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 5 5
MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN 0 25 25
MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 66 66
MAINTENANCE WORKER 0 26 26
ACCOUNT CLERK III 4 -4 0
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
CALL CENTER MANAGER 1 -1 0
CHIEF OF COLLECTIONS 1 -1 0
CONTAINER SERVICE WORKER 2 -2 0
CUSTOMER SERVICE REP I 2 -2 0
CUSTOMER SERVICE REP II 13 -13 0
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES SUPV 7 -7 0
ENVIRON RESOURCES DIVISION MANAGER 1 -1 0
EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 12 -12 0
HEALTH, SAFETY & TRAINING OFFICER 1 -1 0
MAINTENANCE WORKER TRAINEE 24 -24 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST III 1 -1 0
MRF DISPATCHER 1 -1 0
MRF MANAGER 1 -1 0
MRF MACHINERY OPERATOR 3 -3 0
MRF MECHANIC 3 -3 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 1 -1 0
OUTREACH/EDUCATION SPECIALIST 1 -1 0
RECYLCLING MANAGER 1 -1 0
ROUTE CHECKER 5 -5 0
SOLID WASTE EQUIP OPER II 49 -49 0
SOLID WASTE TRANS OPERATOR 14 -14 0
SORTER 26 -26 0
TREATMENT PLANT ELECTRICIAN 1 -1 0

642
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE TOTAL 179 0 179

FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICES
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST 0 1 1
ELECTRICIAN 0 2 2
HVAC MECHANIC 0 2 2
MAINTENACE CREW SUPERVISOR 0 2 2
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDENT 0 1 1
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST 0 9 9
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 2 2
MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN 0 2 2
MAINTENANCE WORKER 0 11 11
CUSTODIAL SUPERVISOR 1 -1 0
CUSTODIAN 11 -11 0
SR. CUSTODIAN 2 -2 0
FAC MAINT WORKER II 6 -6 0
FACILITIES SUPERVISOR 1 -1 0
FINANCIAL ANALYST II 1 -1 0
HVAC TECHNICIAN 2 -2 0
MAINTENANCE CARPENTER 2 -2 0
MAINTENANCE ELECTRICIAN 2 -2 0
MAINTENANCE PLUMBER 1 -1 0
MAINTENANCE SERVICES MANAGER 1 -1 0
SR. FACILITIES MAINTENANCE WORKER 2 -2 0
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICES TOTAL 32 0 32

FLEET SERVICES OPERATION
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 1 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
FLEET SERVICES MECHANIC 0 15 15
FLEET SERVICES MECHANIC, SENIOR 0 4 4
FLEET SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
FLEET SERVICES WORKER 0 1 1
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDENT 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
ACCOUNT CLERK II 1 -1 0
FLEET SERVICES MAINT WORKER 1 -1 0
FLEET SERVICES MANAGER 1 -1 0
FLEET SERVICES MECHANIC I 6 -6 0
FLEET SERVICES MECHANIC II 9 -9 0
SR. FLEET SERVICES MECHANIC 4 -4 0
TIRE REPAIRER 1 -1 0
FLEET SERVICES OPERATION TOTAL 24 0 24

MAINTENANCE SERVICES
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 2 2 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 2 2
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDENT 0 2 2
MAINTENANCE CREW SUPERVISOR 0 4 4
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 6 6
MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN 0 33 33
MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 20 20
PUBLIC SAFETY INVESTIGATIVE SPECIALIST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY II 1 -1 0

643
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 5 -5 0
GRAFFITI ACTION COORDINATOR 1 -1 0
GROUNDSWORKER I 26 -26 0
GROUNDSWORKER II 7 -7 0
MAINTENANCE PLUMBER 1 -1 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 2 -2 0
PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 3 -3 0
PARKS MANAGER 1 -1 0
SR. GROUNDSWORKER 3 -3 0
SR. STREET MAINT WORKER 4 -4 0
SR. TREE TRIMMER 1 -1 0
STREET MAINT SUPERVISOR 1 -1 0
STREET MAINT WKR I 5 -5 0
STREET MAINT WKR II 3 -3 0
STREETS MANAGER 1 -1 0
TRAFFIC SAFETY MAINT WKR 2 -2 0
TREE TRIMMER I 1 -1 0
TREE TRIMMER II 1 -1 0
MAINTENANCE SERVICES TOTAL 71 0 71

PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR/SUPERVISOR 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST, SENIOR 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 3 3 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 2.5 2.5
ASSISTANT DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR II 0 2 2
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES 0 1 1
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR III 0 1 1
ACCOUNT CLERK II 2.5 -2.5 0
ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL ASSISTANT (C) 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 2 -2 0
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR PUBLIC WORKS 3 -3 0
FINANCIAL ANALYST I 1 -1 0
GRANTS COORDINATOR 1 -1 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 1 -1 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST III 1 -1 0
PROJECT MANAGER (ASSET/INVENTORY SPEC.) 1 -1 0
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1 -1 0
UTILITIES FINANCE OFFICER 1 -1 0
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION TOTAL 16.5 0 16.5

SPECIAL DISTRICTS
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST, SENIOR 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 1 1 CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR 0 3 3
MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
GROUNDWORKER II 1 -1 0
LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR II 3 -3 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 1 -1 0

644
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
PROJECT MANAGER 3 -3 0
SPECIAL DISTRICTS TOTAL 9 0 9

ENGINEERING & MAINTENANCE SERVICES
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST 0 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 2 2 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
ASSISTANT ENGINEER 0 2 2
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 0 2 2
BUILDING/CONTRUCTION INSPECTOR 0 4 4
BUILDING/CONTRUCTION INSPECTOR, SENIOR 0 1 1
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER 0 8 8
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER, SENIOR 0 3 3
ENGINEER DIVISION MANAGER 0 3 3
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 0 4 4
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN SUPERVISOR 0 1 1
SENIOR ENGINEER 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 2 -2 0
ASSISTANT CIVIL ENGINEER 2 -2 0
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR I 1 -1 0
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II 3 -3 0
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT COORDINATOR 3 -3 0
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN II 1 -1 0
JUNIOR CIVIL ENGINEER 2 -2 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST I 1 -1 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 1 -1 0
OFFICE ASSISTANT II 1 -1 0
PROJECT MANAGER 8 -8 0
SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER 3 -3 0
SR. CIVIL ENGINEER 3 -3 0
SR. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR 1 -1 0
SR. ENGR TECH/SURVEY CHIEF 1 -1 0
SUPERVISING CIVIL ENGINEER 3 -3 0
ENGINEERING & MAINTENANCE SERIVICES TOTAL 36 0 36

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR/SUPERVISOR 0 1 1
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 0 3 3
ENGINEER DIVISION MANAGER 0 1 1
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST 0 2 2
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 1 1
SENIOR ENGINEER 0 1 1
ASSISTANT TRAFFIC ENGINEER 2 -2 0
ASSOCIATE TRAFFIC ENGINEER 1 -1 0
ENGINEERING TECH II 1 -1 0
SUPERVISING CIVIL ENGINEER 1 -1 0
TRAFFIC ENGINEER 1 -1 0
TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIRER I 1 -1 0
TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIRER II 1 -1 0
TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN 1 -1 0
TRANSPORTATION PLANNER 1 -1 0
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TOTAL 10 0 10

WATER OPERATION
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST 0 3 3

645
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST, SENIOR 0 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR/SUPPORT SUPERVISOR 0 2 2 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 1 1
CHIEF PLANT OPERATOR 0 2 2
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDENT 0 1 1
MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN 0 1 1
PLANT MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST 0 1 1
PLANT MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 1 1
PLANT OPERATIONS MANAGER 0 1 1
PLANT OPERATIONS SHIFT COORDINATOR 0 3 3
PLANT OPERATOR, PRINCIPAL 0 3 3
PLANT OPERATOR, SENIOR 0 2 2
PLANT OPERATOR TRAINEE 0 1 1
UTILITIES FIELD SPECIALIST 0 1 1
UTILITIES FIELD SUPERVISOR 0 4 4
UTILITIES FIELD TECHNICIAN 0 6 6
UTILITIES FIELD TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 21 21
UTILITIES MANAGER 0 1 1
UTILITIES TECHNICAL SERVICES COORDINATOR 0 1 1
UTILITIES TECHNICAL SERVICES MANAGER 0 1 1
UTILITIES TECHNICAL SERVICES SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 3 3
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 1 -1 0
CHIEF OPERATOR 2 -2 0
ELECTRICIAN/INSTRUMENTATION TECH 1 -1 0
MAINTENANCE WORKER TRAINEE 1 -1 0
MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 1 -1 0
METER READER 6 -6 0
METER REPAIR WORKER 3 -3 0
OUTREACH/EDUCATION SPECIALIST 1 -1 0
SCADA/PROGRAMS SUPERVISOR 1 -1 0
SR. BACKFLOW SPECIALIST 1 -1 0
SR. METER READER 1 -1 0
SR. METER REPAIRER WORKER 1 -1 0
SR. WATER DISTRIBUTION OPERATOR 4 -4 0
SR. WATER MECHANIC 1 -1 0
SR. WATER TREATMENT OPERATOR 3 -3 0
WATER CONSERV/OUTREACH COORDINATOR 1 -1 0
WATER CONSERV/OUTREACH SUPERVISOR 1 -1 0
WATER CONSERV/OUTREACH TECH 1 -1 0
WATER DISTRIBUTION OPERATOR I 11 -11 0
WATER DISTRIBUTION OPERATOR II 6 -6 0
WATER DIVISION MANAGER 1 -1 0
WATER OPERATOR IN TRAINING 1 -1 0
WATER OPERATORS MANAGER/CHIEF OPERATOR 1 -1 0
WATER REGULATORY COMPL COORD 1 -1 0
WATER REGULATORY COMPL TECH II 2 -2 0
WATER RESOURCE MANAGER 1 -1 0
WATER TREATMENT OPERATOR II 2 -2 0
WATER TREATMENT OPERATOR III 3 -3 0
WATER OPERATION TOTAL 61 0 61

RECYCLE WATER
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 1 1
ELECTRICIAN 0 1 1
PLANT MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 1 1

646
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
PLANT OPERATIONS MANAGER 0 1 1
PLANT OPERATIONS SHIFT COORDINATOR 0 1 1
PLANT OPERATOR, PRINCIPAL 0 4 4
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 1 -1 0
ADVANCED WATER TREATMENT OP III 4 -4 0
CHIEF PLANT OPERATOR 1 -1 0
SR. ADVANCED WATER TREATMENT OPERATOR 1 -1 0
SR. ADVANCED WATER TREATMENT MECHANIC 1 -1 0
TREATMENT PLANT ELECTRICIAN 1 -1 0
RECYCLE WATER TOTAL 9 0 9

STORM WATER
UTILITIES FIELD TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 1 1
UTILITIES TECHNICAL SERVICES ANALYST 0 1 1
UTILITIES TECHNICAL SERVICES COORDINATOR 0 1 1
UTILITIES TECHNICAL SERVICES MANAGER 0 1 1
SR. WASTEWATER ENVIR SPECIALIST 1 -1 0
TECHNICAL SVCS/WTR QUALITY MGR 1 -1 0
WASTEWATER COLLECT OPERATOR II 1 -1 0
WASTEWATER ENVIRONMENTAL SPEC 1 -1 0
STORM WATER TOTAL 4 0 4

WASTEWATER COLLECTION
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ANALYST 0 1 1
PLANT MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT 0 1 1
UTILITIES FIELD SUPERINTENDENT 0 1 1
UTILITIES FIELD SUPERVISOR 0 2 2
UTILITIES FIELD TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 0 7 7
UTILITIES TECHNICAL SERVICES ANALYST 0 1 1
UTILITIES TECHNICAL SERVICES COORDINATOR 0 7 7
MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 1 -1 0
SR. WASTEWATER COLLECTION OPERATOR 2 -2 0
SR. WASTEWATER ENVIR SPECIALIST 1 -1 0
WASTEWATER COLLECTIONS MANAGER 1 -1 0
WASTEWATER COLLECT OPERATOR II 7 -7 0
WASTEWATER ENVIRONMENTAL SPEC 7 -7 0
WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGER 1 -1 0
WASTEWATER COLLECTION TOTAL 20 0 20

WASTEWATER TREATMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SPECIALIST 0 2 2
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 0 1 1
CHIEF PLANT OPERATOR 0 1 1
ELECTRICIAN 0 2 2
LABORATORY SCIENTIST MANAGER 0 1 1
LABORATORY SPECIALIST 0 4 4
MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN 0 2 2
PLANT MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST 0 13 13
PLANT MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST, SENIOR 0 3 3
PLANT MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT 0 1 1
PLANT MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 0 1 1
PLANT OPERATIONS MANAGER 0 1 1
PLANT OPERATIONS SHIFT COORDINATOR 0 4 4
PLANT OPERATOR, PRINCIPAL 0 6 6
PLANT OPERATOR, SENIOR 0 12 12
UTILITIES MANAGER 0 1 1

647
Department Title
FY 22/23
Adopted
Proposed
Changes
New
Allocation
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY II 1 -1 0
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY III 1 -1 0
ASSISTANT CIVIL ENGINEER 1 -1 0
CHIEF OPERATOR 1 -1 0
ELECTRICIAN/INSTRUMENTATION TECH 2 -2 0
LABORATORY ASSISTANT 1 -1 0
LABORATORY SUPERVISOR 1 -1 0
LABORATORY TECHNICIAN 3 -3 0
MAINTENANCE WORKER TRAINEE 2 -2 0
POWER PROD. OPERATOR II 2 -2 0
SR. WASTEWATER ELECTRICIAN 1 -1 0
SR. WASTEWATER MECHANIC 2 -2 0
SR. WASTEWATER OPERATOR 4 -4 0
TREATMENT PLANT ELECTRICIAN 2 -2 0
WASTEWATER DIVISION MANAGER 1 -1 0
WASTEWATER MAINTENANCE MANAGER 1 -1 0
WASTEWATER MAINTENANCE SUPERV 1 -1 0
WASTEWATER MECHANIC II 9 -9 0
WASTEWATER OPER MGR/CHIEF OPER 1 -1 0
WASTEWATER OPERATOR II 12 -12 0
WASTEWATER OPERATOR III 6 -6 0
WASTEWATER TREATMENT TOTAL 55 0 55
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TOTAL 526.5 0 526.5
GRAND TOTAL 1002.25 0 1002.25

648

MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING -

OXNARD MID-MANAGERS ASSOCIATION
Presented to: City Council
Steve Naveau, Human Resources Director
Mike More, Human Resources Manager
July 28, 2022
649
• Purpose
• To adopt successor Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) with the Oxnard Mid-Managers Association (OMMA)
• To adopt resolutions approving the new classification & compensation structure and to modify the position control schedule as it applies to the OMMA unit
BACKGROUND 2
650
• Class and Compensation Study
• Cost of Living Adjustments (COLAs)
• Medical Plan Contributions
• Bargaining-unit specific issues
ISSUES ADDRESSED DURING BARGAINING 3
651
• Class and Comp Study
• Purpose of the study is to create a broad class system with compensation set using both the external market and internal equity for like type work.
• The last time such a study was conducted was over 25 years ago • Provides the City with ability to ensure that employees are paid based on both internal equity and external market forces in the labor market
• Cost of Living Adjustments (COLAs)
• It has been over seven years since employees’ salary ranges have received COLA adjustments.
• This has hindered the ability to recruit new talent to the organization, as a COLA is a standard component of public sector employee contracts.

ISSUES ADDRESSED DURING BARGAINING 4
652
Medical Plan
• Philosophy – The City should contribute money to a
medical insurance plan so that coverage is affordable & treat all bargaining groups the same
• Intent is to provide sufficient dollar to allow employees to cover a family in at least one medical plan option
• City contribution should keep pace with annual increases to maintain affordability
• The medical plan should not be used to put cash directly into employee pockets
• Cash back when electing medical coverage
• Cash for waiving coverage
ISSUES ADDRESSED DURING BARGAINING 5
653
Medical Plan
• The City will establish a two level medical plan whereby Level One may only consist of employees who were employed with the City prior to January 1, 2023.
• All employees hired on or after January 1, 2023 shall only be eligible for the medical benefits described under Level Two.
• Level One – The City’s contribution is frozen at this level as well as the “waive” which is what the employee receives for not taking coverage. • Level Two - Employees who begin their employment with the City after January 1, 2023, or current employees who make any changes to their health care plan be placed into the Level Two medical plan. • Single, Single plus One, and Family Plan – City contribution change is effective the first full pay period in January of the year specified • 2023 – City contribution will increase by $231 per month to $1,774 • 2024 – City contribution will increase by 5% to $1,863 per month • 2025 – City contribution will increase by 5% to $1,956 per month • Employees who waive coverage will receive $500 cash back • Employees who opt for medical coverage receive no cash back OMMA PROVISIONS 6
654
COLAs
• Total of 9% during the term of the MOU
• 3% FY 22-23
• 3% FY 23-24
• 3% FY 24-25
Class & Compensation
• No instant increase
• Employees moved into range and advance through COLAs
and annual wage adjustments
• For employees still projected to be below range by the end of the contract term, they will be provided an increase to get to the minimum of the proposed ranges
OMMA PROVISIONS (CONT) 7
655
• Establishment of a Retiree Health Savings Plan (RHS) – The OMMA will eliminate the $500 per year wellness
benefit in exchange for the City making a 1% contribution towards an RHS plan. The RHS plan will provide funds to employees to use in retirement for health-related costs.

BARGAINING-UNIT SPECIFIC ISSUES 8
656
• The total estimated cost of this package for OMMA for the upcoming 3-year period is $2,899,064
• 11.02% of total compensation / 3.67% per year
• General Fund impact totals $1,309,405 over the 3-year term • CFO estimates that for each fund and department impacted by the contracts, the City’s FY 2022-23 adopted budget has sufficient appropriations.
• Bargaining units still actively negotiating may create need for additional appropriations
FISCAL IMPACT 9
657
• The Labor Methodology illustrates the cost increase in each year independently as a percentage of base compensation.
• The Budget Methodology compounds the increased cost over the term of the entire contract as a percentage of base compensation.

FISCAL IMPACT (CONT)
658
10 QUESTIONS
659
11 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

REPORTS
AGENDA ITEM NO. M.4
DATE: July 28, 2022
TO: City Council, Community Development Commission Successor Agency, and Oxnard Housing Authority FROM: Ashley Golden, Assistant City Manager, (805) 385-7478, [email protected] SUBJECT: Reconsideration of Successor Agency and Oxnard Housing Authority Properties in the Meta Street Area. (0/10/10)

RECOMMENDATION

1. That the Board of Commissioners of the Housing Authority of the City of Oxnard upholds their October 5, 2021, decision to enter into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with the Oxnard Community Development Commission Successor Agency for property located on 6th and 7th streets adjacent to Meta Street (APNs 201-0-213-140, 201-0-272-030, 201-0- 272-020, and 201-0-213-130).

2. That the Oxnard Community Development Commission Successor Agency:
i. Upholds their October 5, 2021, decision to enter into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Oxnard for property located on 6th and 7th streets adjacent to Meta Street (APNs 201-0-213-140, 201-0-272-030, 201-0-272-020, and 201-0-213-130);
ii. If the October 5, 2021 decision is not upheld, provide direction to staff to return to Committee to consider the parcels as either:
a. “Exempt Surplus Land” subject to the agency’s use and transfer ownership to the City of Oxnard in exchange for the price identified on the Long Range Property Management Plan; or b. “Surplus Land” subject to future affordable housing construction through the California Department of Housing and Community Development.
iii. Provide direction to staff to return to Committee to consider two (2) Successor Agency-owned properties (APNs 201-0-272-170, 201-0-272-200) as either:
a. “Exempt Surplus Land” subject to the agency’s use and transfer ownership to the City of Oxnard in exchange for the price identified on the Long Range Property Management Plan; or b. “Surplus Land” subject to future affordable housing construction through the California Department of Housing and Community Development.

Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video: https://youtu.be/Mytm7lQqo10

BACKGROUND
Executive Summary
On October 5, 2021, staff presented the Successor Agency and the Board of Directors of the Oxnard Housing Authority (OHA) with a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) for the sale of four Oxnard Community Development Commission Successor Agency (Successor Agency) owned properties (collectively, the Properties) for affordable housing purposes, which was approved 7-0. At the meeting, questions were raised about options for these four Successor Agency-owned 660
properties. The responses provided to the Successor Agency were incomplete and incorrect. At that meeting, staff presented that the only options were:

1. Move forward with the PSA between OHA and Successor Agency for the development of affordable housing for four of the six parcels; or

2. Allow the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) to expire, which would mean the parcels would be subject to the Surplus Land Act and development of affordable housing through the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).

During the meeting, questions were raised about options available for the disposition of two other Successor Agencyowned properties that were not part of the October 5, 2021, subject action (APNs 201-0-272-170 and 201-0-272-200 (the Additional Properties). The response provided to the Successor Agency was incomplete and incorrect. At that meeting, staff presented that the only option was to declare the Additional Properties as surplus public land, subject to future affordable housing construction through the HCD.

That information was incomplete as the Successor Agency could also choose to declare these two properties as exempt surplus land, subject to the agency’s (City) use for open space and recreational purposes. See additional information in the Surplus Land Act section of this report.

This report will provide information and context on the Successor Agency-owned parcels, including the Surplus Land Act, Housing Related Parks Program Grant Agreement & Measure O & Housing Element, the Purchase and Sale Agreement between OHA and the Successor Agency for the Properties, the Additional Properties, Oxnard Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Downtown Code, Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission recommendation, and Quimby funds.

Despite the incorrect and incomplete information, staff recommends that the Successor Agency and OHA uphold their October 5, 2021 decision to enter into a PSA between the two agencies, ensuring additional units of affordable housing in the City.

Surplus Land Act
Assembly Bill 1486 (the “Law”) requires a local agency to annually report on surplus land held by the local agency. The intent of this legislation was, among other things, to improve the process for providing notice of surplus land to facilitate the development of affordable housing around the State. The Law requires that any land owned in fee simple “not necessary for the “agency use” be declared surplus prior to disposition of the land. “Agency’s use” is defined in the Law as land that is used or planned to be used for the agency’s work or operations. As defined in the Law, "agency use" expressly excludes commercial or industrial uses, such as non-government retail, entertainment, or office development.

Land for open space or recreational purposes would be considered “agency’s use.” Exempt surplus land can mean properties less than five thousand (5,000) square feet in area or properties transferred from one agency to another for that “agency’s use.”
If an agency disposes of land to finance such a project or activity, that disposition must go through the surplus land process under the Law. Most recently, the Council declared 53 parcels surplus at their February 1, 2022 meeting.

Housing Related Parks Program Grant Agreement & Measure O & Housing Element On November 14, 2017, the City Council authorized an agreement with HCD for grant funds to fund park facility improvements. As part of that report, there was a request from the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission (PRCSC) to purchase land within the Five Points neighborhood, specifically property located at Seventh Street and Meta Street. Staff opposed the inclusion of these parcels due to their size, private ownership, development potential for affordable housing, and lack of budgets to maintain parks. These are the parcels that were part of the October 5, 2021, action authorizing a purchase and sale agreement for the development of affordable housing.

Despite staff’s recommendation, ultimately in 2017, the Council authorized $278,000 in Measure O funding for the “possible purchase of this property understanding that this Affordable Housing Opportunity Site will need to identify a replacement site and denote replacement units in 2018 before the current site can be used for a park.” These parcels 661
(APNs 201-0-272-030 and 201-0-272-020) were subject to the October 5, 2021, action and were designated in both the 5th and 6th cycle Housing Elements for affordable housing.

In January 2020, the Measure O Citizen Oversight Committee recommended that the funding allocated for the land acquisition in the Five Points Neighborhood for a park be removed. On February 18, 2020, the City Council took action to remove funding for the acquisition of land.

Purchase and Sale Agreement between OHA and the Successor Agency On November 17, 2020, the Successor Agency authorized its Executive Director to enter into an ENA by executing Agreement No. A-8247 with the OHA for the Properties to construct affordable housing.

On December 17, 2020, with the Department Of Finance’s approval, the Successor Agency entered into the ENA with the OHA to negotiate the terms of a PSA for the Properties.

On September 14, 2021, the Community Services, Public Safety, Housing & Development Committee recommended the approval of the PSA. On October 5, 2021, staff presented the Successor Agency and the Board of Commissioners of the OHA with a PSA between the Successor Agency and the OHA for the sale of the Properties located in the Meta area of Downtown Oxnard for affordable housing purposes (Attachment 1). The Successor Agency and the OHA both approved the PSA.

Staff recommends that the Successor Agency and OHA uphold their prior decision to enter into a PSA between the two agencies, ensuring the development of additional affordable housing units in the City.

If the action is upheld, the Housing Department and OHA staff will return to the City Council and the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners prior to the required December 29, 2022 deadline to satisfy all escrow conditions, as stated in the PSA, for authorization to execute a Grant Agreement between the City and the OHA, with the use of local or federal funds, to purchase the Properties.

Additional Successor Agency Properties (APNs 201-0-272-170, 201-0-272-200) As stated earlier, on October 5, 2021, staff provided incomplete and incorrect information regarding the Additional Properties properties that the Successor Agency owns (Attachment 2). The Successor Agency actually has two options:

1. Declare either or both of the parcels as “exempt surplus,” as defined earlier in this report which allows for “agency use” such as open space and recreational use; or

2. Declare either or both of the parcels as surplus and offer them through HCD to developers for development, with a priority for affordable housing.

These options have a variety of factors and different financial implications, which could be further explored at Committee should staff be directed to study these options further.

Oxnard Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2021)
The Oxnard Parks and Recreation Master Plan (Parks Master Plan) seeks to guide decision-making for the future development and management of the City’s parks, recreation facilities, beaches, and open spaces (Attachment 4).

The Parks Master Plan identifies Five Points as the City’s most significant gap in park acres per 1,000 residents, with less than one (1) acre per 1,000 residents. The Parks Master Plan states that the City “should consider acquiring some of the vacant lots in these areas to develop into parks, when and if resources become available” (page 54). In addition, the Parks Master Plan states, “as Oxnard has a difficult time managing its existing parks, the City should focus funding on improving what they already have. The City should build Campus Park and Sports Park, and finish College Park while continuing to plan small neighborhood parks for neighborhoods that lack park acreage” (page 140). Lastly, the Parks Master Plan states that “the City should consider privatized parks/open spaces as a way to supplement the amount of park space the City can maintain.” The privatization of park space is discussed further in the Downtown Code section of this report.
662
Concerns about developing a park in Five Points include the lack of continuous open space for recreational activities and the lack of financial and staff resources and staff in the Public Works Department Parks Division (Parks Division) to maintain the existing parks in the City.

Downtown Code
The City’s Downtown Code (Code), adopted in July 2019, which incorporates parts of three neighborhoods (Five Points, Wilson, and Hobson Park East), implements the City’s development and uses of individual lots and buildings in the Downtown area (Attachment 5). The Code is intended to create main street mixed-use areas serving urban neighborhoods of pedestrian-oriented streets with a variety of housing types. Notably, the Code lays the foundation for the creation and standards of public and private open spaces within its boundaries.

The Code establishes standards for both private open space (such as balconies and patios) and public open space. The public open space requirement was first incorporated into the Code in July 2019. This public open space requirement is designed to function as a comprehensive public open space system that supports various mixed-use places and is maintained by the developer.

Per the Code, all new development located on a site of at least 20,000 square feet within the Downtown area is required to provide on-site public open space as a condition of the development:

Required Public Space - Downtown Core, General, and Edge Zones Site Size Min Public Space to be Provided
20,000 sq ft to 2 acres min 7%
> 2 acres min 10%
Within the Five Points neighborhood of the Downtown area, pursuant to the 2019 Downtown Code, one new project (Aspire Apartments), will provide public open space, maintained by the private owner. This public open space is in addition to the private open space meant for the residents of the project.

The 88-unit Aspire Apartments project, located north of 6th Street on Meta Street, includes private and public open space. The second floor of the building includes a common area that will be landscaped and includes bench seating, tables, bike parking, and decorative hardscape. To the south of the building, the project will provide a 5,606 square-foot pocket park, in compliance with the Downtown code public open space requirement. The 5,606 square foot public pocket park is also on the July 28, 2022, Council agenda (Public Hearing item: "Successor Agency and Manay Mansions Purchase and Sale Agreement").

If the Successor Agency upholds their October 5, 2021 approval, the future affordable housing project for the Properties would also require public open space, maintained by the private property owner. Aspire Apartments and the subject Properties are within one block of each other.

Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission
On January 26, 2022, the PRCSC discussed the need for open space or recreational areas for residents in Five Points and identified the Additional Properties as potential future locations. The Parks Division has briefed the PRCSC on the existing challenges with maintaining the City's current inventory of parks. The PRCSC has understood the concerns but still recommended that staff continue to research options for the acquisition of property due to the limited availability of land in the Five Points area.

On May 25, 2022, the PRCSC approved a recommendation to the City Council to allocate sufficient Measure O, Measure E, or General Funds for the purchase and basic improvement of the Additional Properties to create recreational green 663
space in Five Points. The PRCSC desires to reserve Quimby funds for the development of a park.

Based on the Long Range Property Management Plan (LRPMP), the parcels are estimated to be valued at approximately $123,385 through a 2015 Broker Opinion of Value. Sufficient funding would be required to purchase these properties from the Successor Agency and the purchase would also require Ventura County Consolidated Oversight Board and Department of Finance approvals.

Additional Properties’ Characteristics
APN Parcel # (Attachment 3) Sq. Ft LRPMP Estimated Value 201-0-272-170 4 7,404 $111,060
201-0-272-200 5 2,465 $12,325
Quimby Funds
Quimby funds are funds paid by developers to cities in lieu of constructing new parks. Quimby funds cannot be used for the maintenance of a park. As of May 2022, there was approximately $1.25 million available in Quimby funds allocated to Five Points to fund park improvements or new park development. These funds were acquired through the Gateway Station development, a 240-unit residential development just south of Five Points. During the review and approval for that project, in April 2015, the City took a position to remove a 1.4-acre city park designation from the Five Points neighborhood and instead supported the development of privately owned and maintained open space.

Constructing a new park generally starts at approximately $1 million per acre and increases based on added amenities such as structures and restrooms, hardscapes, and lighting. Although, the cost for the actual construction and maintenance of a new park is subject to design and size.

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item supports the Quality of Life strategy. The purpose of the Quality of Life strategy is to restore and increase quality services and programs that enrich Oxnard's diverse community, promotes safe neighborhoods, encourages community engagement, and supports our residents in their efforts to improve their quality of life.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Regarding the OHA and Successor Agency recommendation to uphold their October 5, 2021, Recommendations 1 and 2(i):

As indicated in the October 5, 2021, staff report, the sale price for the Properties totaled $212,740. Per the redevelopment Dissolution Law, net proceeds from the sale of the properties would be transferred to the Ventura County AuditorController for distribution to the other taxing entities. The City’s General Fund, as a taxing entity, would potentially receive approximately $42,000, or an estimated 19.6% of any sales proceeds, in residual distribution from the County.

This amount would be deposited into General Fund Residual Distribution to the City (account no. 101-1001-511.70-09).

Housing Department and OHA staff would return to the City Council and the OHA Board of Commissioners prior to the required December 29, 2022, deadline to satisfy all escrow conditions, as stated in the PSA, for authorization to execute a Grant Agreement between the City and the OHA, with the use of local or federal funds, to purchase the Properties.

Regarding Recommendations 2(ii)(a) and 2(ii)(b) on October 5, 2021:

If the Successor Agency and OHA elected to not uphold their October 5, 2021, decision and instead proceed with recommendation 2(ii)(a) for the Properties, staff would come back before Committee with a Law declaration of exempt surplus land and PSA between the City and Successor Agency. The actual cost of the Properties cannot be determined at 664
this time; the value from a 2015 Broker Opinion of Value in the LRPMP is $212,740 (Attachment 6). Staff would also return with information on additional costs for the prospective design, construction, and maintenance of future open space on the Properties.

If the Successor Agency elected to not uphold their prior decision and instead proceed with recommendation 2(ii)(b) for the Properties, staff would come back before Committee with a Law declaration of surplus land, subject to affordable housing through HCD.

Regarding Recommendations 2(iii)(a) and 2(iii)(b) (Additional Properties):

If the Successor Agency elected to proceed with recommendation 2(iii)(a) for the Additional Properties, staff would come back before Committee with a Law declaration of exempt surplus land and PSA between the City and Successor Agency. The actual cost of the Additional Properties cannot be determined at this time; the value from a 2015 Broker Opinion of Value in the LRPMP is $123,385 (Attachment 6). Staff would also return with information on additional costs for the prospective design, construction, and maintenance of future open space on the Additional Properties.

If the Successor Agency elected to proceed with recommendation 2(iii)(b) for the Additional Properties, staff would come back before Committee with a Law declaration of surplus land, subject to affordable housing through HCD.

COMMITTEE OUTCOME
As mentioned previously in this report, the Community Services, Public Safety, Housing & Development Committee approved the PSA between the OHA and Successor Agency 3-0 on September 14, 2021, to approve the staff recommendation and to forward the item for Successor Agency and OHA approval. On October 5, 2021, staff received approval from the Successor Agency and OHA. Subsequently, this item did not return to Committee.

Prepared by: Ashley Golden, Assistant City Manager, Adam Smith, Project Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. Agreement No. A-8372 - Purchase & Sale Agreement

2. Staff Report - October 5, 2021

3. Additional SA Properties Location

4. Oxnard Parks & Recreation Master Plan - Five Points

5. Downtown Code - Downtown General Zone

6. Long Range Property Management Plan - LRPMP

7. Presentation
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM NO. J.1
DATE: October 5, 2021
TO: City Council
Oxnard Community Development Commission Successor Agency Oxnard Housing Authority
FROM: Emilio Ramirez, Housing Director, (805) 385-8094, [email protected] SUBJECT: Sale of Oxnard Community Development Commission Successor Agency-owned property located on 6th and 7th streets adjacent to Meta Street (APNs 201-0-213-140, 201-0-272-030, 201-0-272-020, and 201- 0-213-130) for a total purchase price of $212,740 to the Oxnard Housing Authority. (0/10/10)

RECOMMENDATION

1. That the Oxnard Community Development Commission Successor Agency adopt a Resolution titled "A Resolution of the Governing Board of the Oxnard Community Development Commission Successor Agency, approving, and recommending to the Ventura County Consolidated Oversight Board approval of: 1) entry by the Oxnard Community Development Commission Successor Agency into a proposed Purchase and Sale Agreement with the Oxnard Housing Authority; (2) a Grant Deed to effectuate said purchase and sale of real property; (3) the remittance of the net purchase price proceeds received by the Oxnard Community Development Commission Successor Agency after close of escrow to the Ventura County Auditor-Controller for disposition to taxing entities; and (4) related actions."

2. That the Board of Commissioners of the Oxnard Housing Authority conduct a public hearing and adopt a Resolution titled "A Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the Oxnard Housing Authority, approving: (1) entry by the Oxnard Housing Authority into a proposed Purchase and Sale Agreement with the Oxnard Community Development Commission Successor Agency; (2) a Grant Deed to effectuate said purchase and sale of real property and the Oxnard Housing Authority’s acceptance thereof; and (3) related actions."

3. That the City Council:
i. Conduct a public hearing and consider the Summary Report prepared pursuant to California Health and Safety Code section 33433; and
ii. Adopt a Resolution titled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Oxnard (1) making findings and taking action pursuant to the provisions of California Health and Safety Code sections 33431 and 33433; (2) approving: (a) the sale and transfer of certain real property from the Oxnard Community Development Commission Successor Agency to the Oxnard Housing Authority; (b) entry by the Oxnard Community Development Commission Successor Agency and the Oxnard Housing Authority into a proposed Purchase and Sale Agreement; and (c) a Grant Deed to effectuate said purchase and sale of real property; and (3) approving related actions.” Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video: https://youtu.be/- D4ZAuFF4ms

BACKGROUND
Over several years, the City of Oxnard’s ("City") former redevelopment agency, the Community Development Commission ("CDC"), purchased multiple properties in downtown Oxnard for downtown revitalization purposes. 691
Due to various downtown redevelopment plans over the intervening years and the severe economic downturn in the late 2000s, redevelopment in downtown Oxnard came to a halt. In addition, a state law that triggered the dissolution of all redevelopment agencies effective February 1, 2012, prohibited the former CDC from entering into new contracts, obligations, or other commitments (the Dissolution Law). At the end of 2015, the state Department of Finance ("DOF") approved the Long Range Property Management Plan ("LRPMP") prepared by the Successor Agency to the former CDC, listing fifty-one (51) properties for disposition.

Of the fifty-one (51) properties identified in the LRPMP, only seven (7) remain. All seven are vacant lots located in Downtown Oxnard.

DISCUSSION
On November 17, 2020, the Oxnard Community Development Commission Successor Agency ("Successor Agency") authorized the Executive Director or designee to execute Agreement No. A-8247 with the Oxnard Housing Authority ("OHA") for the parcel located at 544 Meta Street (201-0-213-140) and APNs 201-0-272-030, 201-0-272-020, and 201- 0-213-130 for the purpose of constructing affordable housing. On December 17, 2020, with the DOF’s approval, the Successor Agency entered into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement ("ENA") (Attachment 5) with the OHA to negotiate the terms of a Purchase and Sale Agreement ("PSA") or Disposition and Development Agreement for four (4) of the seven (7) Successor Agency owned properties: APNs 201-0-213-130, 201-0-272-020, 201-0-272-030, and 201-0-213- 140 (collectively the Properties).

The approval authorized the Successor Agency to negotiate with the OHA for the purchase of the four Successor Agencyowned parcels for the future development of affordable housing; however, it did not approve specific projects for the parcels.

Successor Agency staff immediately entered into negotiations with the OHA to determine the price and terms under which the OHA would acquire the Properties. Any sale of the Properties would include specific requirements regarding the type of project that would need to be constructed (subject to the Parties going through the City’s entitlement process), and ultimate approval of the agreements from the Ventura County Consolidated Oversight Board ("Oversight Board") and DOF. The City retains its approval authority of proposed development to ensure the projects further the City’s vision for Downtown; staff has included these requirements as part of the PSA with the OHA.

Successor Agency and OHA PSA
The LRPMP provides data, background information, and pricing information for each of the seven remaining Successor Agency-owned parcels.

The following table lists the LRPMP value of the parcels contemplated in the PSA, as well as the proposed sale price from the Successor Agency to OHA:

APN LRPMP Value Proposed Purchase Price
201-0-213-130 $90,260 $90,260
201-0-213-140 $36,500 $36,500
201-0-272-020 $42,990 $42,990
201-0-272-030 $42,900 $42,900
TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE $212,740
Purchase and Sale Agreement and Grant Deed Terms
A summary of the terms of both the PSA and Grant Deed (Attachment 1) between the Successor Agency and the OHA is provided below:
692
PSA

1. Purchase price: $212,740

2. Escrow Opening Date: Upon Escrow Holder receiving a mutually executed copy of the PSA Agreement

3. Escrow Closing Date: On or prior to December 30, 2022. (Successor Agency has the option to terminate the agreement if the terms of the conditions of escrow are not satisfied by December 29, 2022).

4. Conditions of Escrow:
a. The OHA has executed and delivered to the Escrow Holder the executed Grant Deed, attached as Exhibit A to the PSA;
b. The OHA has deposited with the Escrow Holder all funds necessary for the Close of Escrow; and c. The OHA has approved a pro forma owner’s policy of title insurance for the Properties.

5. Closing Costs: The Successor Agency will pay all closing costs, including the following:
a. Any and all state, county, or city documentary stamps or transfer taxes pertaining to the seller's conveyance of the Properties;
b. The base escrow fee, plus any additional requested or customary costs; c. The premium for the owner's policy of title insurance for the Properties; and d. Ad valorem taxes, if any, upon the Properties, and ad valorem taxes, if any, upon the PSA Agreement, or any rights thereunder.

Grant Deed

1. Use: All property being conveyed to the OHA must be developed as affordable housing;

2. Covenants Run with the Land: All covenants contained in the grant deed run with the land;

3. Term: All covenants contained in this Grant Deed shall remain in effect for 55 years;

4. Right of Reverter: The Successor Agency has the right, at its option, to re-enter and take possession of the property being conveyed to the OHA, and the OHA must forfeit its title to the property and all improvements if, after conveyance of title and prior to completion of construction of the affordable housing, the OHA does not comply with the following terms:
a. Following City issuance of a building permit, abandons, substantially suspends, or fails to proceed with the construction of the affordable housing development for a period of three months, after written notice thereof from the Grantor; and
b. Transfers or suffers any involuntary transfer of the Property, or any part thereof, in violation of the Grant Deed;

5. Upon completion of construction of all required improvements on the Property, the Successor Agency’s Right of Reverter will terminate; and

6. All terms of the Grant Deed will be binding upon the OHA and any successors and assigns of the OHA. 33433 Report
Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33433, before any successor agency-owned property, acquired in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, with tax increment money is sold or leased for development pursuant to the redevelopment plan, the legislative body shall first approve the sale or lease by resolution after a public hearing. 33433 requires staff to submit a summary report of the sale agreement (Attachment 6), which includes the (i) cost of sale to the successor agency; (ii) estimated value of interest conveyed as determined at highest and best uses permitted under redevelopment plan; (iii) estimated value of interest conveyed as determined at use and with conditions required by sale and explanation for any difference in price if the sale price is less than fair market value; and (iv) explanation of why sale will assist in the elimination of blight.

Next Steps
The approval of the sale of Successor Agency-owned property requires approval by the Successor Agency, Oversight Board, and the DOF. If the Successor Agency accepts the OHA’s offer to purchase the subject properties, staff intends to seek the Oversight Board’s approval on October 27, 2021. Once approved by the Oversight Board and documentation forwarded to the DOF, the DOF would have approximately 100 days to review the request. 693

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item supports Economic Development strategy. The purpose of Economic Development strategy is to focus on the retention and expansion of Oxnard businesses by increasing the skills and employability of our local workforce, invite new business investments, and target site-based redevelopment opportunities.

This agenda item supports the Quality of Life strategy. The purpose of the Quality of Life strategy is to restore and increase quality services and programs that enrich Oxnard's diverse community, promotes safe neighborhoods, encourages community engagement, and supports our residents in their efforts to improve their quality of life.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The sale price for the Properties totals $212,740. Per the redevelopment Dissolution Law, net proceeds from the sale of the Properties would be transferred to the Ventura County Auditor-Controller for distribution to the other taxing entities.

The City’s General Fund, as a taxing entity, would potentially receive approximately $42,000, or an estimated 19.6% of any sales proceeds, in residual distribution from the County. This amount would be deposited into General Fund Residual Distribution to the City (account no. 101-1001-511.70-09).

The Successor Agency will be responsible for paying for all closing costs and related items listed in the staff report under item 5 of the PSA terms. This expenditure is budgeted in the Successor Agency’s Fiscal Year 2021-22 Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule Line #101 (account no. 429-4640-862.82-09).

Housing Department and OHA staff will return to the City Council and the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners prior to the required December 29, 2022 deadline to satisfy all escrow conditions, as stated in the PSA, for authorization to execute a Grant Agreement between the City and the OHA, with the use of local or federal funds, to purchase the Properties.

COMMITTEE OUTCOME
During the Community Services, Public Safety, Housing & Development Committee (Committee) meeting on September 14, 2021, staff informed the Committee that the following corrections would be made to the staff report and OHA resolution prior to the City Council meeting on October 5, 2021:

1. Update recommendation #2 to state that the OHA, in addition to adopting a resolution, will also conduct a public hearing; and

2. In the OHA resolution, replace the term "Governing Board" with "Board of Commissioners" wherever it appears and update Section 6 of the OHA resolution by replacing the term "Executive Director" with "Housing Director."
The Committee voted 3-0 on September 14, 2021, to approve the staff recommendation with corrections and forward this item for Council approval.

Prepared by: Adam Smith, Project Manager, Elsa Brown, Affordable Housing Program Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. Agreement No. A-8372 - Purchase & Sale Agreement

2. Successor Agency Resolution

3. Oxnard Housing Authority Resolution

4. City Resolution

5. Agreement No. A-8247 - Exclusive Negotiating Agreement - SA & OHA

6. 33433 Report - SA to OHA.docx

7. Presentation - Sale of Successor Agency-owned properties 694

ADDITIONAL SUCCESSOR AGENCY PARCELS
Location of the
Additional Successor
Agency Parcels
6 th STREET

META STREET
7th STREET

OXNARD BOULEVARD
ALLEY
1 4
5 695
FEBRUARY 2021

CITY OF OXNARD

PARKS & RECREATION

MASTER PLAN
696

EXISTING CONDITIONS
Park Acres Per
1,000 Residents
0 1 Mile 2 Miles 4 Miles
Park Acres per 1,000 Residents
by Block Groups
<1 acre
1 to 3 acres
>3 acres
Parks and Open Space
Retention Basin
City of Oxnard Boundary
Source: www.parksforcalifornia.org/
parkaccess
More Detail Provided in Recreation
Comparison Table
53 Parks
200,000 People
8 Soccer Fields
Per 200,000 Residents
47 Basketball Courts
Per 200,000 Residents
37 Baseball Diamonds
Per 200,000 Residents
177 Picnic Shelters
Per 200,000 Residents
48 Playgrounds
Per 200,000 Residents
1 Public Swimming
Pool per 200,000 Residents
7 Community Centers
Per 200,000 Residents
10 Park Jogging
Paths per 200,000 Residents
15 Volleyball Courts
Per 200,000 Residents
37 Park Restrooms
Per 200,000 Residents
The city’s most significant gap is the Five Points
neighborhood. Several other neighborhoods in
the center and eastern edge of the city, including
Tierra Vista, Mar Vista and Redwood, have less
than one acre of park space per 1,000 residents.

This is not enough park space to meet the needs
of the city’s current population density in these
areas. It is unknown at this time if property in
these areas could be potentially secured for
additional space.

N Patterson RdN Ventura RdN Oxnard Blvd
N Rose AvePacific Coast Hwy
Ventura Fwy
S Oxnard Blvd
W Channel Islands Blvd
E Pleasant Valley Rd
W Gonzales Rd
Harbor Blvd
Wooley Rd
City of Port
Hueneme

OXNARD PARK AMENITIES PER POPULATION STATISTICS
54 697
OXNARD PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN N Oxnard Blvd
Ventura Fwy
S Oxnard Blvd
W Channel Islands Blvd
Harbor Blvd
Wooley Rd
N Ventura Rd
N Patterson Rd
N Rose AvePacific Coast Hwy
E Pleasant Valley Rd
W Gonzales Rd

PARK WALKABILITY FROM RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES
The majority of Oxnard’s
neighborhoods are within a half a
mile walk of a park. However, some
communities in the southern regions
of Oxnard are closer to one mile from
a park. The neighborhoods that have
a higher walk time to any major park
should be considered first for new
parks and recreation spaces.

Park Walkability in Miles
0’ to 100’
100’ to 500’
.5 to 1 mile
1 to 3 miles
500’ to .25 mile
.25 to .5 mile
3 to 5 miles
5+ miles
55 698
CITY OF OXNARD DOWNTOWN CODE 07.16.19 | C1
CITY OF OXNARD | 16 JULY 2019

DOWNTOWN CODE
699
CITY OF OXNARD DOWNTOWN CODE 07.16.19 | 9
REGULATING PLAN & ZONES | SECTION 16-147
Zoning District Regulating Plan
Fig. 16-147.A
See Figure
16-147.B for
enlargement
See Figure
16-147.C for
enlargement
Max. Height
120 ft
85 ft
35 ft
(2.5 stories)
Max. Height
(w/community benefit)
150 ft w/ Dev. Agmt.
106 ft w/ Dev. Agmt.
44 ft w/ S.U.P.
(3.5 stories)
Zone Districts
Downtown Core (DT C)
See 16-147.3
Downtown General (DT G)
See 16-147.4
Downtown Edge (DT E)
See 16-147.5
DT E-Open Sub-Zone
Shopfront Overlay
See 16-147.1.C.1
All-Affordable Housing Opportunity
Program Additive Zone (AAHOP) See
City Code Ch. 16, Article V., Division 7C
700
SECTION 16-153 | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
16-153 Public Open Space
A public green integrated within a main street environment. 16-153.1 Applicability
This section establishes the standards for the types of public space based on the intended physical character through four types of spaces: 1) Plazas; 2) Pocket Parks; 3) Paseos; and 4) Woonerfs. These types are generally based on their function. Collectively, the civic spaces are designed to function as a comprehensive system of public open space that supports the variety of physical contexts in mixed use places.

The standards of this section apply to a new building(s) on a site of at least 20,000 square feet.

A. Standards
Each development subject to this section is required to provide on-site public space as identified in Table 16-153.

Required Public Space
Table 16-153
Site Size
Min Public Space
to be Provided
20,000 sq ft to 2 acres min 7%
> 2 acres min 10%
Sections:
16-153.1 Applicability...............................................................................................................................................................................58 A. Standards...........................................................................................................................................................................................58 Table16-153;RequiredPublicSpace......................................................................................................................................58 Table 16-153.B; Plaza................................................................................................................................................................59 Table 16-153.C; Pocket Park....................................................................................................................................................60 Table 16-153.D; Paseo..............................................................................................................................................................61 58 | 07.16.19
Table 16-153.E; Woonerf…....................................................................................................................................................62 701
CITY OF OXNARD DOWNTOWN CODE 07.16.19 | 59
PUBLIC OPEN SPACE | SECTION 16-153
Design Standards and Guidelines

4. Landscape
a. Landscape materials should be a balance
of drought-tolerant trees, plants and
groundcover that provide significant shade and
interconnected spaces for convenient movement
through the space.
b. The ground surface should vary to provide a
sense of physical movement across the plaza as
well as support water drainage and reclamation
patterns.
c. Furnishings such as benches, chairs, Tables and
drinking fountains should be provided.

5. Design Details and Elements
a. Size. Smaller dimension must be at least half of
the larger; no dimension may be less than 25'.
b. Visibility. The plaza is visible from adjacent
streets. Pedestrians and motorists alike must
be able see through the space to the building
façades at the back of the plaza.
c. Frontages and Adjacencies. The plaza has
street frontage on at least one side.
d. Lighting. Illumination levels should be at least
1 foot-candle and not more than 7, per on-site
lighting standards (Section 16-320)
e. Structures and Improvements. The space
should provide iconic locations for pavilions,
kiosks, bandstands, public art, water features
and monuments to enhance the space while not
obstructing views and pedestrian connections.

A plaza square with a central fountain and seating areas.

Plazas create essential gathering spaces that support local commercial and retail uses.

Plaza
Table 16-153.B
Plaza
A formal publicly accessible space with focused
landscaping and hardscape for civic purposes and
commercial activities, spatially defined by building frontages, and located at the intersection of important streets or pedestrian paths.

The plaza’s principle function is to serve as a flexible gathering space and to support civic and commercial activities such as farmer’s markets, music concerts and art fairs. The plaza’s design serves all
ages and abilities providing convenient pedestrian
connections through the space to the surrounding
building frontages.
702
SECTION 16-153 | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
Neighborhood-serving recreation facilities are ideal for Pocket Parks.

Design Standards and Guidelines

1. Landscape
a. The ground surface may be predominately
green, hardscape, or a balance of both. Paved
paths and hardscape features should be
integrated to encourage pedestrian movement
through the park.
b. Unobstructed lawn, planting beds, hardscape,
and or drought tolerant landscape are
recommended.
c. Trees should be arranged either naturalistically
or formally and shall be of sufficient scale for the
context.

2. Design Details and Elements
d. Size. Smaller dimension must be at least half of
the larger; no dimension may be less than 25'.
e. Visibility. Visibility across, from one side of the
Pocket Park to the other is required. Hedges and
walls shall not exceed 36 inches in height.
f. Frontages and Adjacencies. The Pocket Park
fronts at least one public street when located
mid-block, or two public streets on the corner of
a block.

Pocket Park
Table 16-153.C
A combination of turf and simple hardscapes.

Pocket Park
A small public open space tucked into a block
generally for the recreation of children, generally
fenced and may include an open shelter. Pocket
Parks may be located anywhere within a block
but should be strategically placed and sized to
contribute to the larger network of open spaces.

Pocket parks are often ideal on small neighborhood blocks adjacent to blocks that have larger open spaces.

Pocket parks may serve as gateways or iconic
markers for smaller neighborhood sub-areas.
g. Shading. Shade structures are allowed but shall
be reviewed for appropriate scale and to not
visually dominate the space.
h. Lighting. Illumination levels should be at least
1 foot-candle and not more than 7, per on-site
lighting standards (Section 16-320)
i. Structures and Improvements. Structures
may include by are not limited to pergolas,
trellises, small monuments, water features,
and pedestrian amenities (benches, Tables,
drinking fountains, etc.), bike racks, playground
equipment and informal athletic courts that
provide a focus to the Pocket Park.
60 | 07.16.19
703
CITY OF OXNARD DOWNTOWN CODE 07.16.19 | 61
PUBLIC OPEN SPACE | SECTION 16-153
Design Standards and Guidelines

1. Landscape
a. Trees may be arranged at varying intervals
along the side or in the middle of the Paseo to
accommodate pedestrian furniture and seating
areas. Variability in tree species, size and spacing
is allowed.
b. Landscaping should allow for pedestrians
to meander through the Paseo side-to-side,
especially in paseos lined with commercial
frontages, but a defined route should encourage
movement through the space.

2. Design Details and Elements
a. Size. Paseos range in width from 10-25 feet in
width and up to the entire depth or length of a
block.
b. Visibility. All buildings along paseos have an
entrance on the Paseo.
c. Frontages and Adjacencies. Residential and
non-residential buildings open directly onto the
Paseo with the integration of stoops, patios and
similar frontages.
d. Lighting. Illumination levels should be at least
1 foot-candle and not more than 7, per on-site
lighting standards (Section 16-320).
e. Structures and Improvements. Small side
courts, rest areas and pedestrian amenities
(benches, picnic Tables, etc.) may be located in
the Paseo.

Wide paseos with significant landscaping create a natural and private environment between multi-family buildings.

Paseo
Table 16-153.D
A Paseo can create active pedestrian environments with
dining areas.

Paseo
A narrow public pedestrian way that provides
beautiful mid-block connections. Paseos can
accommodate residential, commercial and other
non-residential frontages. Paseos present the
opportunity to improve pedestrian connectivity
and safety while reducing the need for vehicular
right-of-ways. Paseos lead or connect to other
streets or open spaces.

Paseos can provide additional locations for shopfronts, patios and outside dining, informal open spaces and mini-plazas between buildings.
704
62 |
PUBLIC OPEN SPACE | SECTION 16-153
Design Standards and Guidelines

1. Landscape
a.
b.

2. Design Details and Elements
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.

Woonerf
Table 16-153.E;
Woonerf
A shared linear space intended to transform existing
alleyways into a secondary pedestrian and cyclist
friendly connected pathway system within Downtown. Woonerfs are designed primarily for pedestrians and cyclists, secondarily to accommodate slow moving and service vehicles, and thirdly can serve as
!exible gathering space. The woonerf provides an
opportunity to convert utilitarian space into safe
public green space within an urban environment.

Woonerfs are typically mid-block and run the length
of the block. A new woonerf can be introduced if an
entire City block is being developed.

Trees can be selectively placed along the
woonerf, typically within the setback area on
adjacent private property. Tree species must
accommodate the needs of Oxnard Fire and
Public Works vehicles.

Planting material can occur within pavers, in
movable planters on castors in the right-of-way,
or within the setback area on adjacent private
property to be incorporated into the woonerf.

Size. City alley rights-of-way vary in size but are
generally between 14 to 20 feet in width. At all
times, a 20 foot wide driving surface is required
for Fire and Public Works vehicles. The
remaining space (i.e., any width wider than the
required 20 feet) may be used for landscaping
and amenities. Building setback areas abutting
the alley are to be incorporated with the
woonerf’s overall design. The building setback
area incorporated into the woonerf is to be
credited to a development project’s minimum
square footage requirement per Table 16-153.

Alley Functionality and Visibility. Woonerfs
are to accommodate the utility, service and
ingress / egress functions of an alley, and are to
connect to public roads at both ends or a public
road on one end and a public amenity on the
other end as authorized by the Public Works
Director. Woonerfs and their features must
accommodate Oxnard Police and Public Works
sightline requirements.i
Service Entries and Adjacencies. Building
entrances, driveways, utilities, and service vehicles
and emergency vehicles needs shall be
accommodated within the improvements.

Parking. Although accessible by vehicles, parking
is discouraged within the Woonerf. When limited
parking is allowed, it shall be for only loading or
unloading.

Lighting. Illumination levels must be at least 1
foot-candle and not more than 7 foot-candles.

Building mounted lighting may spill over into the
alley right-of-way. Blank walls may be used for
projecting images to encourage social gatherings,
and the project image’s lighting levels may exceed
this foot-candle standard as authorized by the
Community Development Director. Light strings or
other items crossing the alley shall be allowed
only with approval from the Fire Department and
Public Works and with a
minimum height of 15 feet.

Structures and Improvements. Benches, tables,
bike racks and/or other pedestrian or cyclist
amenities may be located in the woonerf, setback
or on adjacent buildings. Fixed amenities and
features cannot be located within the right-of-way
without Fire and Public Works authorization.

Furnishings such as benches and tables are
allowed but must be movable from the City
right-of-way.

Movable structures. Movable structures are to be
allowed within the woonerf provided clear paths
of travel are maintained. It is the responsibility of
the immediately abutting property owners to
maintain paths of travel and minimize nuisance
conditions associated with movable structures.

Public Art. Public art is encouraged to be placed
along the woonerf.

Pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles all coexist within the Green Alley/Woonerf.

07.14.20 705
706
707
708
709
710
711
Adam Smith, Project Manager
Emilio Ramirez, Housing Director
Reconsideration of Successor
Agency and Oxnard Housing
Authority Properties in the Meta
Street Area
City Council
July 28, 2022

1. That the Board of Commissioners of the Housing Authority of the City of Oxnard upholds their October 5, 2021,
decision to enter into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with the Oxnard Community Development Commission
Successor Agency for property located on 6th and 7th
streets adjacent to Meta Street (APNs 201-0-213-140,
201-0-272-030, 201-0-272-020, and 201-0-213-130)
RECOMMENDATION 2
712

2. That the Oxnard Community Development Commission Successor Agency:
i. Upholds their October 5, 2021, decision to enter into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Oxnard for property located on 6th and 7th streets adjacent to Meta Street (APNs 201-0-213-140, 201-0-272-030, 201-0-272-020, and 201-0-213-130)
ii. If the October 5, 2021 decision is not upheld, provide direction to staff to return to Committee to consider the parcels as either:
a. “Exempt Surplus Land” subject to the agency’s use and transfer ownership to the City of Oxnard in exchange for the price identified on the Long Range Property Management Plan; or b. “Surplus Land” subject to future affordable housing construction through the California Department of Housing and Community Development.

RECOMMENDATION 3

2. That the Oxnard Community Development Commission Successor Agency:
iii. Provide direction to staff to return to Committee to consider two (2) Successor Agency-owned properties (APNs 201-0-272-170, 201-0-272-200) as either:
a. “Exempt Surplus Land” subject to the agency’s use and transfer ownership to the City of Oxnard in exchange for the price identified on the Long Range Property Management Plan; or b. “Surplus Land” subject to future affordable housing construction through the California Department of Housing and Community Development.

RECOMMENDATION 4
713
• Staff presented incomplete and incorrect information to the Successor Agency (SA) on October 5, 2021 during consideration of a Purchase and Sale Agreement between the Oxnard Housing Authority and SA for properties in the Meta Street Area
• Incomplete and incorrect information was regarding options for sale and use of the parcels.
• Questions were raised about properties that were not part of the October 5, 2021 action - information concerning those parcels was also incomplete and incorrect.
• Despite the incorrect information staff recommends that the SA and OHA uphold their October 5,2021 decision and enter into a PSA between to two agencies, in support of affordable housing AND provide direction to return to Committee regarding the additional Properties owned by the SA.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
• Assembly Bill 1486 (the Law) requires a local agency to annually report on surplus land held by the local agency; the Law seeks to improve the process to provide notice of surplus land for affordable housing • Most recently, the Council declared 53 parcels surplus at their February 1, 2022 meeting
• Requires that any land owned in fee simple not necessary for “agency use” be declared surplus prior to disposition of the land • Agency use = land that is used or planned to be used for the agency’s work or operations
• Land for open space or recreational purposes would be considered agency’s use
SURPLUS LAND ACT 6
714
• On November 14, 2017, the City Council authorized:
• an agreement with HCD for grant funds to fund park facility improvements
• $278,000 in Measure O funding for the “possible purchase of this property understanding that this Affordable Housing Opportunity Site will need to identify a replacement site and denote replacement units in 2018 before the current site can be used for a park”
• In January 2020, the Measure O Citizen Oversight Committee recommended that the funding allocated for the land acquisition in the Five Points Neighborhood for a park be removed
• On February 18, 2020, the City Council took action to remove funding for the acquisition of land
PARKS PROGRAM GRANT, MEASURE O, HOUSING ELEMENT 7
REMAINING SUCCESSOR AGENCY(SA) PARCELS 8
6 th STREET

META STREET
7th STREET

OXNARD BOULEVARD
ALLEY
1 2
3 4
5 7 6
• “The Properties”: 2, 3, 6,
7 to construct affordable
housing (the Properties)
• Approved for sale to
the OHA
• “Additional Properties”:
4 & 5
715

PURCHASE SALE AGREEMENT (PSA) BETWEEN OHA & SUCCESSOR
AGENCY
9 6
th STREET

META STREET
7th STREET

OXNARD BOULEVARD
ALLEY
1 2
3 4
5 7 6
• On November 17, 2020, the
SA entered into an Exclusive
Negotiating Agreement
(ENA) with the OHA for
sites 2, 3, 6, 7 to construct
affordable housing (the
Properties)
• On December 17, 2020,
with Dept. of Finance
approval, the SA entered
into the ENA with the OHA
to negotiate the terms of a
PSA for the Properties
PSA BETWEEN OHA & SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE PROPERTIES 10 6 th STREET

META STREET
7th STREET

OXNARD BOULEVARD
ALLEY
1 2
3 4
5 7 6
• On September 14, 2021,
the Community Services,
Public Safety, Housing &
Development
recommended the
approval of the PSA
• On October 5, 2021, the
Successor Agency and the
OHA both approved the
PSA
716
11 META STREET
6 th STREET
7th STREET

OXNARD BOULEVARD
ALLEY
2 3
PSA Between Successor
Agency and OHA for 4
SA Properties
7 6

PSA - SUCCESSOR AGENCY PARCELS
• Staff recommends that the Successor Agency and OHA uphold their prior decision to enter into a PSA between the two agencies, ensuring the development of additional affordable housing units in the City, consistent with the Housing Element.
• If the action is upheld, staff will return to the City Council and the OHA prior before the December 29, 2022 deadline to satisfy all escrow conditions for authorization to execute a Grant
Agreement between the City and the OHA to purchase the
Properties
PSA BETWEEN OHA & SUCCESSOR AGENCY 12
717
• As stated earlier, on October 5, 2021, staff provided incomplete and incorrect information regarding the Additional Properties • The Successor Agency actually has two options:

1. Declare either or both of the parcels as “exempt surplus,” as defined earlier in this report which allows for “agency use” such as open space and recreational use; or

2. Declare either or both of the parcels as “surplus” and offer them through HCD to developers for development, with a
priority for affordable housing.

ADDITIONAL SUCCESSOR AGENCY PROPERTIES 13 THE ADDITIONAL PROPERTIES 14 6 th STREET

META STREET
7th STREET

OXNARD BOULEVARD
ALLEY
4 5
718
• The Parks Master Plan seeks to
guide decision-making for the
future development and
management of the City’s parks,
recreation facilities, beaches,
and open spaces
• Identifies Five Points as the
City’s most significant gap in
park acres per 1,000 residents,
with less than one (1) acre per
1,000 residents
OXNARD PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN (2021) 15
• Plan states that the City
“should consider acquiring
some of the vacant lots in
these areas to develop into
parks, when and if resources
become available”
• Also states the City “has a
difficult time managing its
existing parks, the City should
focus funding on improving
what they already have”
OXNARD PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN (2021) 16
719
• Finally, the Parks Master Plan states that “the City should consider privatized parks/open spaces as a way to supplement the amount of park space the City can maintain”
• Concerns for developing a park in Five Points include the lack of continuous open space for recreational activities
• Lack of financial and staff resources and staff in the Public Works Department Parks Division to maintain the existing parks in the City
OXNARD PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN (2021) 17
• Adopted in July 2019
• Implements the City’s
development and uses of
individual lots and buildings in
the Downtown area
• The Code lays the foundation
for the creation and standards
of public and private open
spaces within the Downtown
DOWNTOWN CODE 18
720
• A public open space
requirement was incorporated
into the Code in July 2019
• Requirement is designed to
function as a comprehensive
public open space system that
supports various mixed-use
places
DOWNTOWN CODE 19
All new development located on a site of at least 20,000 square feet within the Downtown area is required to provide on-site public open space as a condition of the development:

DOWNTOWN CODE 20
Required Public Space - Downtown Core, General, and Edge Zones Site Size Min Public Space to be Provided
20,000 sq ft to 2 acres min 7%
> 2 acres min 10%
721
● One new project in the Downtown (Aspire Apartments) will provide public open space, maintained by the private owner ● This public open space is in addition to the private open space meant for the residents of the project
● The project will provide a 5,606 square-foot public pocket park, in compliance with the Downtown code
○ The PSA for this pocket park is on the Council’s July 28th agenda
● The future affordable housing project for the Properties would also require public open space, maintained by the private property owner
DOWNTOWN CODE 21 RENDERING - ASPIRE APARTMENTS PUBLIC POCKET PARK 22 asdasdaddsd
722
• On January 26, 2022, the PRCSC
discussed the need for open
space or recreational areas for
residents in Five Points
• Identified the Additional
Properties as potential future
locations
PRCSC 23
6 th
STREET

META STREET
7th
STREET

OXNARD BOULEVARD
ALLEY
4 5
• PRCSC has understood Parks Division concerns on the challenges with maintaining City parks
• Still recommended that staff continue to research options for the acquisition of property due to the limited availability of land in the Five Points area
• On May 25, 2022, the PRCSC approved a recommendation to the City Council to allocate sufficient Measure O, Measure E, or General Funds for the purchase and basic improvement of the Additional Properties to create recreational green space in Five Points and reserve Quimby funds for the development of a park PRCSC 24
723
• Quimby funds are funds paid by developers to cities in lieu of constructing new parks
• Quimby funds cannot be used for the maintenance of a park • As of May 2022, there was approximately $1.25 million available in Quimby funds allocated to Five Points
• Constructing a new park generally starts at approximately $1 million per acre and increases based on added amenities • Cost for the actual construction and maintenance of a new park is subject to design and size
QUIMBY FUNDS 25
Regarding the OHA and Successor Agency recommendation
(Recommendation 1 & 2(i)) to uphold their October 5, 2021, recommendation:
• The sale price for the Properties totaled $212,740
• Per redevelopment dissolution law, the City’s General Fund, as a taxing entity, would potentially receive approximately $42,000, or an estimated 19.6% of any sales proceeds
• Staff would return to the City Council and the OHA Board prior to the required December 29, 2022, deadline to satisfy all escrow conditions for authorization to execute an Agreement between the City and the OHA, with the use of local or federal funds, to purchase the Properties
FINANCIAL IMPACT 26
724
Regarding Recommendation 2(ii)(a) on October 5, 2021:
• Staff would come back before Committee with a Law declaration of exempt surplus land and PSA between the City and Successor Agency
• The value from a 2015 Broker Opinion of Value in the LRPMP is approximately $213,000
• Staff would also return with information on additional costs for the prospective design, construction, and maintenance of future open space on the Properties
FINANCIAL IMPACT 27
Regarding Recommendation 2(ii)(b) on October 5, 2021:
• Staff would come back before Committee with a Law declaration of surplus land
• Properties then subject to affordable housing through HCD FINANCIAL IMPACT 28
725
Regarding Recommendation 2(iii)(a) (Additional Properties):
• Staff would come back before Committee with a Law declaration of exempt surplus land and PSA between the City and Successor Agency
• The value from a 2015 Broker Opinion of Value in the LRPMP is approximately $123,000
• Staff would also return with information on additional costs for the prospective design, construction, and maintenance of future open space on the Additional Properties
FINANCIAL IMPACT 29
Regarding Recommendation 2(iii)(b) (Additional Properties):
• Staff would come back before Committee with a Law declaration of surplus land
• Properties then subject to affordable housing through HCD FINANCIAL IMPACT 30
726

1. That the Board of Commissioners of the Housing Authority of the City of Oxnard upholds their October 5, 2021,
decision to enter into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with the Oxnard Community Development Commission
Successor Agency for property located on 6th and 7th
streets adjacent to Meta Street (APNs 201-0-213-140,
201-0-272-030, 201-0-272-020, and 201-0-213-130)
RECOMMENDATION 31

2. That the Oxnard Community Development Commission Successor Agency:
i. Upholds their October 5, 2021, decision to enter into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Oxnard for property located on 6th and 7th streets adjacent to Meta Street (APNs 201-0-213-140, 201-0-272-030, 201-0-272-020, and 201-0-213-130)
ii. If the October 5, 2021 decision is not upheld, provide direction to staff to return to Committee to consider the parcels as either:
a. “Exempt Surplus Land” subject to the agency’s use and transfer ownership to the City of Oxnard in exchange for the price identified on the Long Range Property Management Plan; or b. “Surplus Land” subject to future affordable housing construction through the California Department of Housing and Community Development.

RECOMMENDATION 32
727

2. That the Oxnard Community Development Commission Successor Agency:
iii. Provide direction to staff to return to Committee to consider two (2) Successor Agency-owned properties (APNs 201-0-272-170, 201-0-272-200) as either:
a. “Exempt Surplus Land” subject to the agency’s use and transfer ownership to the City of Oxnard in exchange for the price identified on the Long Range Property Management Plan; or b. “Surplus Land” subject to future affordable housing construction through the California Department of Housing and Community Development.

RECOMMENDATION 33

THE END
34 728

FINANCE AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

AGENDA REPORT

REPORTS
AGENDA ITEM NO. M.5
DATE: July 28, 2022
TO: Finance & Governance Committee
FROM: Shiri Klima, Deputy City Manager, (805) 385-7487, [email protected] SUBJECT: Third Amendment with Kreative Core Technologies Corp (9431-21-FN) for ERP Project Management Services. (0/10/5)

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute a Third Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Kreative Core Technologies Corp (9431-21-FN) in the amount of $1,700,000 for a new not to exceed contract amount of $2,600,000 and to extend the term to December 31, 2023, for Project Management Services related to the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) implementation. (Finance and Governance Committee approved 3-0.)
Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video: https://youtu.be/5S9LoQCCflY

BACKGROUND
The Tyler Munis enterprise resource planning (ERP) project was approved by Council on October 1, 2019, and represents a significant investment in new technology designed to enhance the way the City conducts its business and manages many financial and non-financial processes. The ERP project is comprised of five modules in the following chronological order: Core Financials, Human Capital Management (HCM), Energov, Enterprise Asset Management, and Utility Billing.

UPDATED LAUNCH DATES FOR CORE FINANCIALS AND HCM PHASES In March of 2022, the Deputy City Manager determined that the first phase, Core Financials, be launched on October 1, 2022, instead of July 1, 2022, and HCM will be launched April 1, 2023, instead of January 1, 2023. Her decision was reached for the following reasons:
 Going Live with Core Financials at the start of a new fiscal year would increase the risk of critical errors having audit implications as the start of a new year requires significant reviews of all purchase orders, contracts, and encumbrances for the prior year, where recognizing a transaction as June 30 or July 1 means the difference of which year an expense or revenue is recorded. Transactions posted a day earlier or later in October will not yield a similar risk as they are all in the same fiscal year.  The City does not have the IT staffing required to implement and concurrently maintain and support the ERP project and newly live ERP module. Staff has addressed this within the Fiscal Year 2022-23 729
proposed budget, adding requests for new positions and reclassifying others in order to position the City to maintain and leverage the investment in the new ERP.  The Finance Department had a number of key vacancies during the early part of 2022, with recruitments in various stages. The vacancies included Financial Controller, Purchasing Manager and Budget Manager. Ensuring enough time for recruitment and onboarding is essential to the success of any financial system implementation. The City hired a Purchasing Manager and Financial Controller in the Spring of 2022, with the Budget Manager recruitment ongoing.  In addition, moving Core Financials from July to October has and will enable more time for testing and training related to Core Financials, that will improve the success of the implementation in the long term.

Given a lot of the same resources are working on the Core Financials and HCM phases, and in consideration of the amount of change the organization can absorb at any one time, the Core Team determined that moving the Core Financials launch date means we must also move HCM’s launch date. The City cannot launch Core Financials in the fall and then HCM three months later. Thus, HCM’s new launch is April 1, 2023.

The impact of the new launch dates is to extend the project management services by three months at an anticipated project management cost of up to $172,500, with recommended stabilization support post go-live for both Core Financials and HCM an additional $100,000.

UPDATED PROJECT FOX TIMELINE
ERP Phase Discovery Implementation Go Live
Core Financials Complete Ongoing Oct 2022
HCM / Time &
Attendance
Complete Ongoing Apr 2023
EnerGov Jan 2023 May 2023 Jan 2024
Enterprise Asset
Management
Jun 2023 Nov 2023 Jun 2024
Utility Billing Jan 2024 Jun 2024 Apr 2025
During the project phases of Core Financials and HCM, staff has learned a great deal more about Tyler products and the City’s resources needed to implement. While the need for these tools is pressing, it has become apparent that more time and resources are needed to ensure the City evaluates and implements each module appropriately.

A new timeline is presented that extends the whole project, and still represents a reasonably aggressive but achievable timeline. One critical change is to switch the Enterprise Asset Management and Utility Billing phases, with the goal of leveraging new features and functionality to help primarily Public Works better manage the wide range of machinery, equipment and infrastructure required to operate the City of Oxnard. Utility Billing is currently managed using the legacy HTE system and will continue to be functional during the project timeline.

IMMEDIATE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL IT RESOURCES
The City’s new Tyler Munis ERP solution requires information technology staffing throughout each module’s implementation and post-implementation, when a module transitions into ongoing service operations mode and is ingrained in conducting the City’s day-to-day business. The FY 2022-23 ERP project budget includes the 730
creation of an initial 5-person IT ERP team. Due to the highly competitive demand for technology talent in today’s labor market, it is unknown how long it will take the City to recruit and onboard the team.

It is imperative that IT resources be added to the project team quickly to mitigate the risks of project delays, reduced quality, and/or diminished scope attributed to a lack of technology expertise and capacity. The resources identified as needed immediately are: a full-time reports developer, a half-time Finance business systems analyst, a full-time HR/Payroll business systems analyst, and a full-time Tyler Munis systems administrator. Therefore, staff recommends the City use temporary IT resources through Kreative Core, until permanent City staff can be recruited and on-boarded. The impact of using temporary IT resources from Kreative Core is $734,700 for 5,076 hours of technical services provided from May 22, 2022, through January 31, 2023. Staff recommends adding a 25% contingency, $183,675, in the event that the City is unable to fill all 5 IT ERP in-house positions on or before January 31, 2023.

ENERGOV: DISCOVERY AND IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE
EnerGov is a Tyler software product purchased by the City as part of the original ERP contract. This tool has the ability to significantly enhance planning and permitting processes to the benefit of residents, developers, business owners and City staff. The City requires expert professional project management in order to analyze current business practices, configure and test EnerGov, and ensure that the final implementation best meets the needs of the City and its constituents.

Kreative Core has significant experience implementing EnerGov as part of the Tyler suite of products and is uniquely placed to support the City with this phase given the role it has played in the first two phases of the project, Core Financials and Human Capital Management.

Staff anticipates the discovery phase of the EnerGov implementation will take approximately three months, which will begin in January 2023. The third amendment includes an additional $152,000 to provide the project management services necessary to deliver a successful implementation.

HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT: TIME AND ATTENDANCE
In police and fire departments, highly specialized software-based scheduling platforms have become commonplace. Staff has identified products tailored to manage police and fire operations: UKG Telestaff for Fire, and InTime for Police. Users of these platforms will be able to build operational schedules, and not only assign staff to shifts, but to accommodate shift trades, leave usage, and overtime, which is not available in standard timekeeping software. Additionally scheduling rules based on agreements with bargaining units can be built into these products. Both UKG Telestaff and InTime will interface directly with Tyler Munis payroll module with HCM, significantly improving efficiency. The non-public safety staff around the City will continue to do standard timekeeping through our current software, ExecuTime, which will also interface directly with Tyler Munis payroll module with HCM.

In order to implement these systems in a manner that works successfully with other facets of the City’s ERP system, careful consideration needs to be given to interfaces, policies and processes. Staff recommends Kreative Core provide project management services to ensure compliance and continuity with the Tyler Core Financials and HCM modules. The anticipated contract amendment for these services is anticipated to be $219,400.

ENTERPRISE ASSET MANAGEMENT
Staff recommend that Kreative Core provide project management services with the Enterprise Asset Management phase that is due to commence discovery in June 2023. This third amendment includes $25,600 in funding for this up until June 30, 2023. Staff will return with any other amendments necessary to complete 731
the Enterprise Asset Management and Utility Billing portions as earlier phases of the ERP project are completed.

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item supports the Organizational Effectiveness strategy. The purpose of the Organizational Effectiveness strategy is to reinforce, stabilize, improve, and strengthen the organizational foundation of the City in order to build a modern, high-functioning City government that effectively and efficiently supports the operating departments in providing high-quality services and programs for our residents and businesses.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Professional Service Phase Description Amount
Project Management Core Financials / HCM Additional 3 Months $172,500 Project Management Core Financials / HCM Stabilization Support $100,000 Project Management Time and Attendance Discovery, Project Management and
Stabilization
$219,400
Project Management EnerGov Discovery, Project
Management and
Stabilization
$153,600
Project Management Enterprise Asset
Management
Discovery, Project
Management
$25,600
Project Management All Phases Overall Project
Coordination
$26,875
IT Support Service All Phases Applications Support,
Development, System
Administration
$734,700
Travel / Other Costs All Phases $53,650
Contingency All Phases For IT support services
pending any delays in
recruitment
$183,675
Total Not to Exceed $1,700,000
All charges for services are made on time and materials basis with time cards provided in support of invoices for services received. The City reimburses Kreative Core based on the negotiated rates per hour or part thereof.

The Fiscal Year 2023 Adopted Budget includes sufficient appropriations within Fund 316, as well as anticipated salary savings - due to a high vacancy rate - within the IT department to cover the anticipated costs in Fiscal Year 2023. Future budget requests will include the appropriation requests necessary to fund future costs.

Staff are currently negotiating with Tyler reductions in project management services and software fees under contract 8767-19-IT. Council previously delegated authority to staff to make reductive changes to the Tyler 732
contract as necessary, which will help to offset some of the increases recommended as part of this third amendment to the Kreative Core Contract.

Prepared by: Mark Sewell, Assistant Chief Financial Officer

ATTACHMENTS

1. Third Amendment to Professional Services with Kreative Core Technologies, Inc. 9431-21-FN

2. Second Amendment to Professional Services Agreement 94-31-FN

3. First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement 9431-21-FN

4. Agreement for Professional Services with Kreative Core Technologies, Inc.

5. Presentation Third Amendment - Kreative Core Technologies 733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
Agreement No. 9431-21-FN

FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This First Amendment ("First Amendment") to the Professional Services Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into in the County of Ventura, State of California, this fifth day of October, 2021, by and between the City of Oxnard, a municipal corporation ("City''), and Kreative Core Technologies Corp - CA Secretary of State Number C48064 72, ("Consultant").

This First Amendment amends the Agreement entered into on September 13th, 2021, by City and Consultant.

City and Consultant agree as follows:

1. The date in Section 5 of the Cover Page of the Agreement is hereby amended to "September 30, 2022."

2. The Total Agreement Amount in Section 6 of the Cover Page of the Agreement is hereby amended to ''Not to Exceed $200,000 (Two Hundred Thousand) for all Services."

3. The following is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference into the Agreement: [Enter name of newly attached exhibit] Exhibit.

4. The reference to the Scope of Work Exhibit everywhere it is listed both on the Cover Page and in the Agreement is hereby amended to the Scope of Work as of October 5, 2021 Exhibit. The Scope of Work Exhibit is hereby disincorporated; instead, the Scope of Work as of October 5, 2021 Exhibit is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

5. The reference to the Rates and Costs Exhibit everywhere it is listed both on the Cover Page and in the Agreement is hereby amended to add also the Rates and Costs as of October 5, 2021 Exhibit. The Rates and Costs as of October 5, 2021, Exhibit is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

6. As so amended, the Agreement remains in full force and effect. [Signatures on next page]
SERVICES CONTRACT (9431-21-FN)
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
Third Amendment to Professional
Services Contract 9431-21-FN
with Kreative Core Technologies
Corp.

City Council
July 28, 2022
Shiri Klima, Deputy City Manager
767
RECOMMENDATION 2
That  the  City  Council  approve  and  authorize  the  Mayor  to execute  a  Third  Amendment  to  the  Professional  Services Agreement  with  Kreative  Core  Technologies Corp  (9431-21- FN)  in  the  amount  of  $1,700,000  for  a  new  not  to  exceed contract  amount  of  $2,600,000  and  to  extend  the  term  to December 31, 2023, for Project Management Services related to the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) implementation. 768
Separate technology systems that provide the foundational framework for nearly all City functions such as:
•Timekeeping
•Human Resources
•Payroll
•Budgeting
•Financial Reporting
•Grant Management
•Capital Project Management
•Community Development
•Utility Billing
•Asset Maintenance
The ERP integrates these functions so they “speak to each other” WHAT IS ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING (ERP)? 3
769

HISTORY
Council
Approves
RFP
Funding
RFP
Released
Requirements
Gathering
Contracts
(Tyler Tech &
Berry Dunn.)
Kick-Off
2016 2017 2018/19 2019/20
4 Executime
Launch
BlueBeam
Launch
2020 2021
Project
Management
Contract
(Kreative Core)
2021
770

PROJECT GOALS & OBJECTIVES

1. Improve customer service to internal and external
customers

2. Make it easier for residents and businesses to conduct business with the City

3. Achieve enhanced coordination across departments

4. Improve process efficiencies and data accuracy

5. Provide greater capabilities for tracking project costs and viewing real-time project data

6. Reduce redundant “shadow systems”, data entry, storage and paper processes

7. Update business processes and policies to reflect the capabilities of modern technology (Best Practices)
5 771
PROJECT GOALS & OBJECTIVES (continued)

8. Streamlined processes and workflows

9. Enable real-time information management and enhanced reporting tools & dashboards

10. Provide integrated self-service for staff, residents, vendors & businesses

11. Integrate databases that improve process efficiencies and data accuracy

12. Centralize electronic document management

13. Design an open system with access to other City
applications
6 772

UPDATED PROJECT TIMELINE
ExecuTime
Time & Attendance
Advanced Scheduling
Munis ERP
Core Financials
Human Capital Mgmt
Community Development
Utility Billing
Asset Maintenance
Integration
Time & Attendance
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2020
Dec ‘19 - Sep ‘20
Jul ‘20 – Oct ’22
Nov ‘21 – Apr ’23
Jan ‘23 – Feb ‘24
Jan ‘24 – Apr ‘25
Jun ‘23 – Jun’24
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Today
Dec ‘20 – May ‘21
Jul ‘22 – Apr ’23
7 Aug’ 20 – Feb ’21* Cancelled: Does Not Meet City Needs 773
UPDATED PROJECT TIMELINE 8
• Rescheduled launch of Core Financials and HCM Phases
• October 2022 and April 2023 respectively.
• Key Vacancies within the Finance and IT teams in Spring and Summer of 2022.
• Provide time for new staff to get up to speed.
• Going Live at Start of Fiscal Year for Core Financials higher risk of audit implications.
• Increase amount of time allocated to training staff.
774
PROJECT MANAGEMENT 9
• City Council approved professional services contract for with BerryDunn in June 2020.
• BerryDunn supported the City implementation of ExecuTime, analysis of current and future process analysis for Core Financials and Organizational Change Management.
• Progress on largest, most complex phase - Core Financials - slowed by summer of 2021.
• Kreative Core Technologies contracted to perform a project assessment in September 2021.
• Original Contract: Not to Exceed $25,000
• City Core Team unanimously agreed with all recommendations to bring Core Financials back on track for launch.
775
THIRD AMENDMENT: KREATIVE CORE TECHNOLOGIES 10
• Successful recent Tyler implementations at cities similar to Oxnard.
• Certified Project Managers dedicated 100% to all ERP
phases.
• Good progress made on Core Financial and HCM Phases.
• City administratively entered into a contract to provide Project Management Services for Core Financial and HCM phases.
• Oct 2021: First Amendment: Not to Exceed $200,000.
• Feb 2022: Second Amendment: Not to Exceed $900,000.
• July 2022: Third Amendment: Not to Exceed $2,600,000. 776
THIRD AMENDMENT: KREATIVE CORE TECHNOLOGIES 11
• Additional $1,700,000 services anticipated until 6/30/23:
• Impact of rescheduling Core Financials and HCM: $173k • Providing Support immediately following launch: $100k • Project Managing Time and Attendance: $220k
• Project Managing EnerGov*: $154k
• Project Managing EAM*: $26k
• IT Support Services: $735k
• Snr Project Management / Travel: $111k
Sub Total: $1.52m
• IT Support Services contingency: $184k
Not to Exceed: $1.70m
*Staff anticipates returning to Council with a Fourth Amendment prior to June 30, 2023 future needs.
777
RECOMMENDATION 12
That  the  City  Council  approve  and  authorize  the  Mayor  to execute  a  Third  Amendment  to  the  Professional  Services Agreement  with  Kreative  Core  Technologies Corp  (9431-21- FN)  in  the  amount  of  $1,700,000  for  a  new  not  to  exceed contract  amount  of  $2,600,000  and  to  extend  the  term  to December 31, 2023, for Project Management Services related to the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) implementation. 778
ANY QUESTIONS? 13
779

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

REPORTS
AGENDA ITEM NO. M.6
DATE: July 28, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Michael Wolfe, Public Works Director, (805) 385-8055, [email protected] SUBJECT: Agreement A-8487 with Unlimited Engineering Contracting Inc. for Thompson Park, Johnson Creek Park and Sierra Linda Park Improvements Project, Specification No. PW 22-100. (0/5/5)

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve and authorize the following for a total of $1,021,068.00 in Project funds for the Thompson Park, Johnson Creek Park and Sierra Linda Park Improvements Project, Specification No. PW 22-100 (Project Nos. 215706 & 225704):

1. The Mayor to execute Agreement A-8487 with Unlimited Engineering Contracting Inc. in the amount of $850,890 for the Project;

2. A Project contingency amount of $85,089 for the Project; and

3. A Project allocation amount of $85,089 for engineering, inspection, survey and project management for the Project.

This item did not originate in Committee as this is a capital improvement project specifically listed in the City's Capital Improvement Program budget, which was previously approved by the City Council.

Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video: https://youtu.be/- EflrM2BnPg

BACKGROUND
The existing playground equipment at Thompson Park, Johnson Creek Park, and Sierra Linda Park have all reached the end of their useful life and are in need of replacement. The new playground equipment will help enhance the amenities at each park and enhance the safety of children using the new playground equipment.

The work includes removal and disposal of existing playground equipment, concrete supports, and playground surface coverings and the installation of new playground equipment, concrete supports, playground surface coverings and all other associated work.

Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Reference:

Project No. 215706 & 225704 – Playground Replacement Project PW 22-100 - CIP 2021-2026 - Adopted May 18, 2021 – Page 86.

DISCUSSION
The notice inviting formal bids (NIFB) on the Project was published on May 26, 2022, and all bids were due on June 22, 780
2022 and opened June 22, 2022. The City received the following bid:

Unlimited Engineering Contracting Inc.: $269,730.00
The lowest (and only) bidder is Unlimited Engineering Contracting Inc. and its bid is responsive to the City’s NIFB.

Following this determination, procurement staff reviewed all documentation received from Unlimited Engineering Contracting Inc. and its subcontractors. Procurement staff verified possession of required currently valid licenses, reviewed the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) website for safety violations, and verified registration with the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). Based upon the available information and research performed to date, staff believes that the contractor is capable of satisfactorily completing the project. Thus, staff recommends that the City Council award the contract for this Project to Unlimited Engineering Contracting Inc.

There was only one bidder on this project with ten planholders. The bid received was lower than the Engineer’s estimate. The limited bidder response may be attributed to the size of the project or competition with the other projects that were available for bid around the same time. The City has past experience working with this bidder at Durley Park for the playground improvement project which was completed May 2019.

Based on the available budget, the contract award is not only the base bid amount of $269,730.00 but also additive bid item numbers 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 27 for an additional cost of $581,160.00 for a total award amount of $850,890.00. The additive bid items include additional playground equipment and pour in place rubber safety surface for Thompson Park and Johnson Creek Park and all Work, play equipment and rubber safety surface for Sierra Linda Park.

In addition to the project award amount of $850,890.00, staff recommends authorizing $170,178.00 for the project, which includes $85,089.00 for project contingency (10% of the contract costs) and $85,089.00 for the cost for engineering services and City staff (10% of the contract cost). Engineering services include the following activities during construction: engineering, inspection, survey and project management. These recommendations bring the total estimated cost of the project to $1,021,068.00.

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item supports the Quality of Life strategy. The purpose of the Quality of Life strategy is to restore and increase quality services and programs that enrich Oxnard's diverse community, promotes safe neighborhoods, encourages community engagement, and supports our residents in their efforts to improve their quality of life.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The total cost for this Project shall not exceed $1,021,068.00 which includes the construction agreement, contingency and project allocation. The Thompson Park, Johnson Creek Park and Sierra Linda Park Improvements Project 215706 has an available project budget balance of approximately $395,000 from the 2006 TAB HERO/SW/ORMOND Fund (315) and the Playground Replacement Project 225704 has an available project budget balance of $1,135,000 from the General Fund Capital Outlay Fund (301).

COMMITTEE OUTCOME
This item did not originate in Committee as this is a capital improvement project specifically listed in the Capital Improvement Program budget, which was previously approved by the City Council.

Prepared by: Tatiana Arnaout, City Engineer

ATTACHMENTS

1. A-8487 (PW 22-100) Agreement with Unlimited Eng. Contracting Inc.

2. Presentation
781
Agreement No.: A-8487
1 CONTRACT

CITY OF OXNARD CONTRACT FOR

THOMPSON PARK, JOHNSON CREEK PARK AND SIERRA LINDA PARK

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
SPECIFICATION NO. PW 22-100
THIS CONTRACT (“Contract”) is made and entered this ______ day of _____________, 20___ (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF OXNARD, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and UNLIMITED ENGINEERING CONTRACTING INC. (“Contractor”). Contractor’s license number is 966591.

In consideration of the covenants set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Incorporation. The Contract consists of all Contract Documents, which shall include the Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, General Provisions, Special Provisions, Plans, Standard Plans, Greenbook, Reference Specifications, Bid (including documentation accompanying the Bid and post-Bid documentation submitted before the notice of award), insurance documentation, Bonds, the City business license, permits from regulatory agencies, Addenda, Change Orders and Supplemental Agreements. These documents are incorporated herein by reference.

2. Scope of Services. Contractor shall perform the Work in a good and workmanlike manner for the project identified as Thompson Park, Johnson Creek Park and Sierra Linda Park Improvements Project, Specification No. PW 22-100 (“Project”), as described in this Contract and in the incorporated Contract Documents.

3. Compensation. In consideration of the services rendered hereunder, City shall pay Contractor a not to exceed amount of eight hundred fifty thousand eight hundred ninety dollars ($850,890.00) in accordance with the prices as submitted in the Bid, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference.

4. Antitrust Claims. In entering into this Contract, Contractor assigns to City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C.

Section 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Business and Professions Code Section 16700 et seq.) arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the Contract. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time City tenders final payment to Contractor without further acknowledgment by the parties.

5. Prevailing Wages. City and Contractor acknowledge that the Project is a public work to which prevailing wages apply. Copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to perform the Project are on file with the Project Coordinator at City Hall and will be made available to any interested party on request. Contractor and all Subcontractors are not qualified to bid on, be listed in a Bid proposal, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, as defined in Labor Code Sections 1720 through 1861, unless registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5 at the time of Bid submission.

6. Workers’ Compensation. Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every contractor will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees. In accordance with the provisions of Labor Code Section 1861, by signing this Contract, the Contractor certifies as follows: “I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every 782
Agreement No.: A-8487
2 employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Work of this Contract.”

7. Titles. The titles used in this Contract are for convenience only and shall in no way define, limit or describe the scope or intent of this Contract or any part of it.

8. Authority. Any person executing this Contract on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Contract on behalf of Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

9. Entire Agreement. This Contract, including all incorporated documents, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the Project, and supersedes all previous agreements, promises, proposals, representations, understandings and negotiations, whether written or oral, between the parties regarding the subject matter.

10. Amendment. No Contract modification, amendment or supplement to this Contract other than Change Orders will be binding unless written and signed by the parties’ duly authorized representatives.

11. Counterparts. This Contract may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. A signed copy of this Contract transmitted by facsimile, email or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original executed copy of this Contract for all purposes.
[signatures on following page]
783
Agreement No.: A-8487
3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the Agreement on the first written above.

CITY OF OXNARD UNLIMITED ENGINEERING CONTRACTING INC.

John C. Zaragoza, Mayor1 Date Kevin Carter, CEO2 Date
Alexander Nguyen, City Manager
Purchasing Manager
[name] , Buyer
Kristina Carter, Secretary Date
ATTEST:

Rose Chaparro, City Date
Clerk (only if Mayor signs)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Stephen M. Fischer, City Date
Attorney (always required)
1 The City Council must authorize and the Mayor must sign any agreement over $200,000 annually. The City Manager may authorize and sign any agreement over $100,000 but up to $200,000 annually. The Purchasing Manager may authorize and sign any agreement up to $100,000 annually. A Buyer may authorize and sign any agreement up to $25,000 annually. 2 The City requires the following for any contract:
• For a corporation, the signatures of the Board President, CEO or Vice President and of the Board Secretary, Assistant Secretary, CFO or Assistant Treasurer; • For an LLC, the signatures of at least two managers of the LLC (company directors, not lower-level managers); or
• For a partnership, the signature of a partner. If the partnership is a limited partnership, the signer must be a general partner.

If the company has a different structure, or if the above-listed persons are not the appropriate signers, please submit to the City Attorney legally-binding documentation stating who can sign and bind your company.
784
4 Exhibit INS-G

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
(WITHOUT BUILDER’S RISK REQUIREMENT)

1. Contractor shall obtain and maintain during the performance of any services under this Contract the following insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of services hereunder by Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. a. Commercial General Liability Insurance, including Contractual Liability, in an amount not less than $2,000,000 combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage for each claimant for general liability with coverage equivalent to Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability Coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001). If a general aggregate limit is used, that limit shall apply separately to the project location or shall be twice the occurrence amount; b. Business Automobile Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage for each claimant for automobile liability with coverage equivalent to Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability Coverage (Occurrence Form CA0001) covering Code No. 1, “any auto;” c. If architectural, engineering, or electrical work will be performed under the Contract, Professional Liability/Errors and Omissions Insurance appropriate to the work being done in an amount not less than $1,000,000, with neither Contractor nor listed subcontractors having less than $500,000 individually. The Professional Liability/Errors and Omissions Insurance must be project specific with at least a one year extended reporting period, or longer upon request. d. Workers’ Compensation Insurance in compliance with the laws of the State of California, and Employer’s Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per claimant. Additionally, the workers’ compensation policy shall include a waiver of all rights of subrogation which the insurer may have against the City.

2. Contractor shall, prior to performance of any services, file with the Risk Manager certificates of insurance with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Exhibit INS-G. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements are to be on the attached forms or on other forms approved by the Risk Manager. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the Risk Manager before work commences. City reserves the right to require complete certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time. The certificates of insurance and endorsements shall be sent via email (or fax if necessary) to the Risk Manager, addressed as follows (do not send hard copies):

City of Oxnard
Insurance Compliance
Reference No. A-8487
P.O. Box 100085 – OX
Duluth, GA 30096
Via Email: [email protected]
Via Fax: 678-259-1007

3. Contractor agrees that all insurance coverages shall be provided by a California admitted insurance carrier with an A.M.

Best rating of A:VII or better and shall be endorsed to state that coverage may not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, or reduced in coverage or limits without 30 days’ prior written notice to the Risk Manager. The Risk Manager shall not approve or accept any endorsement if the endorsement contains “best effort” modifiers or if the insurer is relieved from the responsibility to give such notice.

4. Contractor agrees that the Commercial General Liability and Business Automobile Liability Insurance policies shall be endorsed to name City, its City Council, officers, employees and volunteers as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Contractor; products and completed operations of Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its City Council, officers, employees and volunteers. The General Liability Special Endorsement Form and Automobile Liability Special Endorsement Form attached to this Exhibit INS-G or substitute forms containing the same information and acceptable to the Risk Manager shall be used to provide the endorsements (ISO form CG 2010 11/85 or if not available, CG 2010 with an edition date prior to 01/04 and CG 2037).

5. The coverages provided to City shall be primary and not contributing to or in excess of any existing City insurance or selfinsurance coverages (this must be endorsed). Additionally, the workers’ compensation policy shall include a waiver of all rights of subrogation which the insurer may have against the City. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to City, its City Council, officers, employees and volunteers. The insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.

6. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Risk Manager. At the option of the Risk Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City, its City Council, officers, employees and volunteers, or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. 785
5 7. All insurance standards applicable to Contractor shall also be applicable to Contractor’s subcontractors. Contractor agrees to maintain appropriate agreements with subcontractors and to provide proper evidence of coverage upon receipt of a written request from the Risk Manager.
786
6 INSTRUCTION FOR SUBMITTING INSURANCE CERTIFICATES AND ENDORSEMENT FORMS Certificates of Insurance
The sample accord form on the following page is provided to facilitate your preparation and submission of certificates of insurance. You may use this or any industry form that shows coverage as broad as that shown on the attached sample. Please note the certificate holder address must be as shown on the attached sample accord form with the contract number and insurance exhibit identification information completed. Improperly addressed certificates may delay the contract start-up date because the City’s practice is to return unidentifiable insurance certificates to the insured for clarification as to the contract number. Cancellation provisions must be endorsed to the policy. Modifying the certificate does not change coverage or obligate the carrier to provide notice of cancellation.

Endorsement Forms
Original endorsements are required for general liability and automobile liability insurance policies and must be attached to the applicable certificate of insurance. City preference is that you use the endorsement forms which are attached.

Substitute forms will be accepted, however, as long as they include provisions comparable to the attached. 787
7 ACORD CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE ISSUE DATE (MM/DD/YY)

PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.

CODESUB-CODE COMPANIES AFFORDING INSURANCE COVERAGE

INSURED COMPANY

LETTER ASPECIFY COMPANY NAMES IN THIS SPACE

COMPANY

LETTER B

COVERAGES

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING

ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

CO
LTR

TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE

DATE (MM/DD/YY)

POLICY EXPIRATION

DATE (MM/DD/YY)
LIMITS

A GENERAL LIABILITY
[x] COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
[ ] CLAIMS MADE [x] OCCUR.
[x] OWNER’S & CONTRACTOR’S PROT.

GENERAL AGGREGATE $2,000,000
PRODUCTS COMP/OP AGG. $2,000,000
PERSONAL & ADV. INJURY $2,000,000
EACH OCCURRENCE $2,000,000
FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $
MED. EXPENSE (Any one person) $

A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
[x] ANY AUTO

ALL OWNED AUTOS

SCHEDULED AUTOS

HIRED AUTOS

NON-OWNED AUTOS

GARAGE LIABILITY
COMBINED SINGLE $1,000,000 LIMIT
BODILY INJURY $
(Per person)
BODILY INJURY $
(Per accident)
PROPERTY DAMAGE $

A EXCESS LIABILITY

UMBRELLA FORM

OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
EACH OCCURRENCE $
AGGREGATE $
A WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
AND
EMPLOYERS’ LIABILITY

STATUTORY LIMITS
EACH ACCIDENT $1,000,000
DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $1,000,000
DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE $1,000,000

A OTHER
Errors and omissions insurance or malpractice insurance available for the insured’s profession; if architectural, engineering or electrical work will be performed under the Contract
Minimum coverage $1,000,000
Each consultant/ $500,000
& listed sub-consultant

DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS

CERTIFICATE HOLDER

CITY OF OXNARD
Attn: Insurance Compliance
Reference No.A-8487
P.O. Box 100085 – OX
Duluth, GA 30096
Via Email: [email protected]
Via Fax: 678-259-1007

CANCELLATION

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE

CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES.

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
788
8 GENERAL LIABILITY SPECIAL ENDORSEMENT
FOR THE CITY OF OXNARD (the ACity@)

SUBMIT IN DUPLICATE
ENDORSEMENT NO. ISSUE DATE (MM/DD/YY)
PRODUCER POLICY INFORMATION:

Insurance Company:

Policy No.:

Policy Period: (from) (to)
LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSE  Included in Limits
 In Addition to Limits
Telephone:  Deductible  Self-Insured Retention (check which) of $ with an Aggregate of $ applies to NAMED INSURED coverage.  Per Occurrence  Per Claim (which) APPLICABILITY. This insurance pertains to the operations, products and/or tenancy of the named insured under all written agreements and permits in force with the City unless checked here  in which case only the following specific agreements and permits with the City are covered:

CITY AGREEMENTS/PERMITS

TYPE OF INSURANCE

GENERAL LIABILITY
 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
 COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY
 OWNERS & CONTRACTORS PROTECTIVE
 Claims Made
Retroactive Date
 Occurrence

OTHER PROVISIONS

COVERAGES
LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS $

EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE
 GENERAL
 PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS
 PERSONAL & ADVERTISING INJURY
 FIRE DAMAGE


CLAIMS: Underwriter=s representative for claims pursuant to this insurance.

Name:

Address:

Telephone: ( )
In consideration of the premium charged and notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any endorsement now or hereafter attached thereto, insurance company agrees as follows:

1. INSURED. The City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers are included as insureds with regard to liability and defense of suits arising from the operations, products and activities performed by or on behalf of the named insured.

2. CONTRIBUTION NOT REQUIRED. As respects: (a) work performed by the named insured for or on behalf of the City; or (b) products sold by the named insured to the City; or (c) premises leased by the named insured from the City, the insurance afforded by this policy shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers; or stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the named insured=s scheduled underlying primary coverage. In either event, any other insurance maintained by the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST. This insurance applies separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the company=s limits of liability. The inclusion of any person or organization as an insured shall not affect any right which such person or organization would have as a claimant if not so included.

4. CANCELLATION NOTICE. With respect to the interests of the City, this insurance shall not be canceled, or materially reduced in coverage or limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by receipted delivery has been given to the City.

5. PROVISIONS REGARDING THE INSURED=S DUTIES. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policy or breaches or violations of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers.

6. SCOPE OF COVERAGE. This policy, if primary, affords coverage at least as broad as:
a. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability Coverage, Aoccurrence@ form CG0001; or b. If excess, affords coverage which is at least as broad as the primary insurance form CG0001.

Except as stated above nothing herein shall be held to waive, alter or extend any of the limits, conditions, agreements or exclusions of the policy to which this endorsement is attached.

ENDORSEMENT HOLDER

CITY OF OXNARD
Attn: Insurance Compliance
Reference No.A-8487
P.O. Box 100085 – OX
Duluth, GA 30096
Via Email: [email protected]
Via Fax: 678-259-1007

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
 Broker/Agent  Underwriter 
I (print/type name), warrant that I have authority to
bind the above-mentioned insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company to this endorsement.

Signature
(original signature required)
Telephone: ( ) Date Signed
789
9 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY SPECIAL ENDORSEMENT
FOR THE CITY OF OXNARD (the ACity@)

SUBMIT IN DUPLICATE
ENDORSEMENT NO. ISSUE DATE (MM/DD/YY)
PRODUCER POLICY INFORMATION:

Insurance Company:

Policy No.:

Policy Period: (from) (to)
LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSE  Included in Limits
 In Addition to Limits
Telephone:  Deductible  Self-Insured Retention (check which) of $ with an Aggregate of $ applies to NAMED INSURED coverage.  Per Occurrence  Per Claim (which) APPLICABILITY. This insurance pertains to the operations, products and/or tenancy of the named insured under all written agreements and permits in force with the City unless checked here  in which case only the following specific agreements and permits with the City are covered:

CITY AGREEMENTS/PERMITS

TYPE OF INSURANCE OTHER PROVISIONS
 COMMERCIAL AUTO POLICY
 BUSINESS AUTO POLICY
 OTHER
LIMIT OF LIABILITY CLAIMS: Underwriter=s representative for claims pursuant to this insurance.

Name:

Address:

Telephone:( )
$ per accident, for bodily injury and property damage.

In consideration of the premium charged and notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any endorsement now or hereafter attached thereto, insurance company agrees as follows:

1. INSURED. The City, its officers, agents, volunteers and employees are included as insureds with regard to liability and defense of suits arising from the operations, products and activities performed by or on behalf of the named insured.

2. CONTRIBUTION NOT REQUIRED. As respects: (a) work performed by the named insured for or on behalf of the City; or (b) products sold by the named insured to the City; or (c) premises leased by the named insured from the City, the insurance afforded by this policy shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers; or stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the named insured=s scheduled underlying primary coverage. In either event, any other insurance maintained by the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST. This insurance applies separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the company=s limits of liability. The inclusion of any person or organization as an insured shall not affect any right which such person or organization would have as a claimant if not so included.

4. CANCELLATION NOTICE. With respect to the interests of the City, this insurance shall not be canceled, or materially reduced in coverage or limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by receipted delivery has been given to the City.

5. PROVISIONS REGARDING THE INSURED=S DUTIES. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policy or breaches or violations of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers.

6. SCOPE OF COVERAGE. This policy, if primary, affords coverage at least as broad as:
a. Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability Coverage, Aoccurrence” form CA0001, code (Aany auto@); or b. If excess, affords coverage which is at least as broad as the primary insurance form referenced in the preceding section (1).

Except as stated above nothing herein shall be held to waive, alter or extend any of the limits, conditions, agreements or exclusions of the policy to which this endorsement is attached.

ENDORSEMENT HOLDER

CITY OF OXNARD
Attn: Insurance Compliance
Reference No.A-8487
P.O. Box 100085 – OX
Duluth, GA 30096
Via Email: [email protected]
Via Fax: 678-259-1007

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
 Broker/Agent  Underwriter 
I (print/type name), warrant that I have authority to
bind the above-mentioned insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company to this endorsement.

Signature
(original signature required)
Telephone: ( ) Date Signed
790
10 Bond No. __________

PAYMENT BOND
(LABOR AND MATERIALS)
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that:

WHEREAS the City of Oxnard (“Agency”), State of California, has awarded to (“Principal”)
(Name and address of Contractor)
a contract (the “Contract”) for the Work described as THOMPSON PARK, JOHNSON CREEK PARK AND SIERRA LINDA PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, SPECIFICATION NO. PW 22- 100.

WHEREAS, under the terms of the Contract, the Principal is required before entering upon the performance of any Work, to file a good and sufficient Payment Bond with the Agency to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 3 (commencing with Section 9000) of Part 6 of Division 4 of the Civil Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Principal, and
(Name and address of Surety)
a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of __________________ (“Surety”) a duly admitted surety insurer under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, and our heirs, assignees, successors, executors and administrators are held and firmly bound, jointly and severally, unto the Agency and all Contractors, Subcontractors, laborers, material suppliers, and other persons employed in the performance of the Contract and referred to in Title 3 (commencing with Section 9000) of Part 6 of Division 4 of the Civil Code in the penal sum of Dollars ($ ), this amount
being not less than a hundred percent (100%) of the total Contract Price in lawful money of the United States of America, for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to this Work or labor, that the Surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this Bond, will pay, in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by Agency in successfully enforcing this obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered.

It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this Bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 3 (commencing with Section 9000) of Part 6 of Division 4 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this Bond.

Upon expiration of the time within which the California Labor Commissioner may serve a civil wage and penalty assessment against the principal, any of its Subcontractors, or both the principal and its Subcontractors pursuant to Labor Code Section 1741, and upon expiration of the time within which a joint labor management committee may commence an action against the principal, any of its Subcontractors, or both the principal and its Subcontractors pursuant to Labor 791
11 Code Section 1771.2, if the condition of this Bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect.

The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, including all incorporated documents, shall in any manner affect its obligations on this Bond. The Surety hereby waives notice of any such change, extension, alteration, or addition. Additionally, the Surety hereby waives California Civil Code 2845 and 2849 as well as any statutes of limitation, statutes of repose and laches as they may apply to an action on this Bond.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by Principal and Surety, on the date set forth below, the name of each party being hereto affixed and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative(s) pursuant to authority of its governing body.

Dated:
“Principal”
By:

Its:
__________________________
By:

Its:
__________________________
(Seal)
“Surety”
By:

Its:
__________________________
By:

Its:
__________________________
(Seal)
Notes: This Bond must be executed in duplicate and dated, all signatures must be notarized, and evidence of the authority of any person signing as attorney-in-fact must be attached. Date of Bond must not be before the Effective Date of the Contract. Surety companies executing Bonds must appear on the Treasury Department’s most current list (Circular 570 as amended) and be authorized to transact business in the State of California.
792
12 Bond No. __________

PERFORMANCE BOND
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that:

WHEREAS the City of Oxnard (“Agency”), has awarded to
(“Principal”)
(Name and address of Contractor)
a contract (the “Contract”) for the Work described as THOMPSON PARK, JOHNSON CREEK PARK AND SIERRA LINDA PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, SPECIFICATION NO. PW 22- 100.

WHEREAS, Principal is required under the terms of the Contract to furnish a Bond for the faithful performance of the Contract.

NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Principal, and
, (Name and address of Surety)
a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of __________________ (“Surety”) a duly admitted surety insurer under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the Agency in the penal sum of Dollars ($ ), this
amount being not less than a hundred percent (100%) of the total Contract Price in lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, assignees, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT, if the hereby bounded Principal, his, her or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the Contract and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on the Principal’s part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the Agency, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void one (1) year from the date of recordation of the Notice of Completion for the Project; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect.

As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by Agency in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. Surety hereby waives any statutes of limitation, statutes of repose and laches as they may apply to an action on this Bond.

The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract, including all incorporated documents, or of the Work to be performed thereunder or the Specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect the Surety’s obligations under this Bond. The Surety hereby waives notice of any such change, extension of 793
13 time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the Work or to the Specifications.

Surety hereby waives California Civil Code 2845 and 2849. The City is the principal beneficiary of this Bond and has all rights of a party hereto.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by Principal and Surety, on the date set forth below, the name of each party being hereto affixed and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative(s) pursuant to authority of its governing body.

Dated:
“Principal”
By:

Its:
__________________________
By:

Its:
__________________________
(Seal)
“Surety”
By:

Its:
_________________________
By:

Its:
_________________________
(Seal)
Notes: This Bond must be executed in duplicate and dated, all signatures must be notarized, and evidence of the authority of any person signing as attorney-in-fact must be attached. Date of Bond must not be before the Effective Date of the Contract. Surety companies executing Bonds must appear on the Treasury Department’s most current list (Circular 570 as amended) and be authorized to transact business in the State of California
794
795
796
797
798
City Council
July 28, 2022
Tatiana Arnaout, PE
City Engineer
Agreement to Unlimited Engineering Contracting
Inc. for the Thompson Park, Johnson Creek Park
and Sierra Linda Park Improvements Project
PW 22-100
799

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve and authorize the following for a total of $1,021,068.00 in Project funds for the Thompson Park, Johnson Creek Park and Sierra Linda Park Improvements
Project, Specification No. PW 22-100 (Project Nos. 215706 & 225704):

1. The Mayor to execute Agreement A-8487 with Unlimited Engineering Contracting Inc. in the amount of $850,890 for the Project;

2. A Project contingency amount of $85,089 for the Project; and

3. A Project allocation amount of $85,089 for engineering, inspection, survey and project management for the Project. 2 800

BACKGROUND
Thompson Park, Johnson Creek Park and Sierra Linda
Park Improvements Project

1. The existing playground equipment at Thompson Park, Johnson Creek Park, and Sierra Linda Park have all reached the end of their useful life and are in need of replacement. The new playground equipment will help enhance the amenities at each park and enhance the safety of children using the new playground equipment.

2. The work includes removal and disposal of existing playground equipment, concrete supports, and playground surface coverings and the installation of new playground equipment, concrete supports, playground surface coverings and all other associated work. 3 801

BACKGROUND
Sierra Linda Park – Existing Playground Equipment
802

BACKGROUND
Sierra Linda Park – Existing Playground Equipment
803

BACKGROUND
Johnson Creek Park – Existing Playground Equipment
804

BACKGROUND
Johnson Creek Park – Existing Playground Equipment
805

BACKGROUND
Thompson Park –Existing Playground Equipment
806

BACKGROUND
Thompson Park – Existing Playground Equipment
807

DISCUSSION
• The notice inviting formal bids (NIFB) on the Project was published on May 26, 2022, and all bids were due on June 22, 2022 and opened June 22, 2022.
• The City received the following (1) bid:

Unlimited Engineering Contracting Inc.: $269,730.00
• Unlimited Engineering Contracting Inc. was found to be the lowest responsive bidder for this project and staff recommends that the City Council award the contract for this Project to Unlimited Engineering Contracting Inc.
808

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Total cost for the Project shall not exceed $1,021,068.00 and includes:
• Agreement A-8487 with Unlimited Engineering Contracting Inc. for $850,890 • Project contingency of $85,089
• Engineering, inspection, survey, and project management (EISPM) of $85,089 • There is currently $395,000 available from the 2006 TAB HERO/SW/ORMOND Fund (315) and the Playground Replacement Project No. 225704 has an available project budget balance of $1,135,000 from the General Fund Capital Outlay Fund (301) 11 809
QUESTIONS?
810

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

REPORTS
AGENDA ITEM NO. M.7
DATE: July 28, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Michael Wolfe, Public Works Director, (805) 385-8055, [email protected] SUBJECT: Additional Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2021-22 in the Golf Enterprise Fund. (0/10/5)

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve and authorize the recognition of additional golf course revenues in the amount of $1,197,450 and appropriate an amount not to exceed $778,352 for FY 2021-22 in the Golf Enterprise Fund (651).

Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video: https://youtu.be/r9D2oaeKcjA

BACKGROUND
American Golf Corp (AGC) was awarded the River Ridge Golf Course Management Agreement beginning July 1, 2019.

Since that time, the golf operations has posted a profit, revenues over expenses, for each fiscal year. As an Enterprise Fund, the annual golf profits are saved collectively in the Golf Course Fund Balance.

DISCUSSION
For Fiscal Year 2021-22, the golf course revenues are exceeding the revenue projections by over $1.1 million for a projected final annual revenue of $6 million. However, these additional revenues are largely driven by the need for additional Food & Beverage supplies and Golf Merchandise. There were also additional expenses for employee costs in Food & Beverage and equipment costs for compliance with the Air Quality Management District. Therefore, the golf course is projected to exceed the Fiscal Year 2021-22 operations budget of $3.7 million by approximately $778,000. An appropriation of $778,352 is being requested to increase the Fiscal Year 2021-22 expense budget from $3.7 million to $4.5 million. The projected revenues for Fiscal Year 2021-22 will increase from $4.8 million to $6 million.

While staff tracks the expenses and revenues through monthly budget and performance meetings with AGC, there are timing issues with respect to posting and accounting of cost of sales. Additionally, since there are unknown factors that continuously impact the golf operations, such as bad weather events or COVID restrictions, the request for this appropriation was delayed until after the end of the Fiscal Year.

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item is a routine operational item or does not relate to the five strategic priorities adopted by City Council on March 16, 2021.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
811
The additional $1,197,450 in projected golf course revenue will offset the appropriation amount of $778,352 for the Expense Budget increase for Fiscal Year 2021-22.

Golf Enterprise Fund - AGC Budget Adopted FY 21-22
Budget
Increased
Adjustments
Revised FY 21-22
Budget
Revenues 4,802,550 1,197,450 6,000,000
Expenditures 3,721,648 778,352 4,500,000
Net Surplus 1,080,902 419,098 1,500,000
There is no impact to the General Fund for approval of this item.

COMMITTEE OUTCOME
This item did not originate in Committee.

Prepared by: Steve Howlett, Assistant Public Works Director

ATTACHMENTS

1. Budget Appropriation

2. Presentation
812
Department: Date:

Project/Program
Manager: Phone:

Reason for Appropriation:

Accounts and Descriptions AMOUNT
Fund:

Revenues/Transfers In
1,197,450
Sub-total Revenues 1,197,450
Expenditures/Transfers Out
1,275
269,998
25,452
1,735
479,892
Sub-total Expenditures 778,352
Net Change to Fund Balance 419,098
Net Appropriation Change 778,352
Approvals
Department Director
Chief Financial Officer
City Manager
651-6401-615.77-52 American Golf Corse Operation
6406-GOLF COURSE AGC
GENERAL LIABILITY INSUR.

REQUEST FOR BUDGET APPROPRIATION
Recognize increase in revenues and additional appropriation in the Golf Enterprise Fund for AGC.

July 28, 2022
805-385-7900
Public Works
Steve Howlett
651-Golf Course Operating
6401-Golf Course Operation River Ridge Golf Course

OTHER SERVICES
UTILITY EXPENSE‐ELECTRIC
651-6406-824.82-42
651-6406-824.82-84
651-6406-824.82-61

INTERNET CHARGES
651-6406-824.82-09 SERVICES‐OTHER PROF/CONTR
651-6406-824.84-20

REQUIRES CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZATION
BA# (Finance Use Only)______________
BA Doc# (Finance Use Only)___________
Revised : 2/23/2012
813
Additional Appropriation for Fiscal Year
2021-22 in the Golf Enterprise Fund
City Council
July 28, 2022
Steve Howlett
Asst. Public Works Director
814

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to recognize additional golf course revenues in the amount of $1,197,450 and appropriate an amount not to exceed $778,352 for FY 2021-22 in the Golf Enterprise Fund (651).
2 815

BACKGROUND
• American Golf Corp (AGC) was awarded the River Ridge Golf Course Management Agreement beginning July 1, 2019
• The golf operations has posted a profit, revenues over expenses, for each fiscal year
• As an Enterprise Fund, the annual golf profits are saved collectively in the Golf Course Fund Balance
3 816

DISCUSSION
• For Fiscal Year 2021-22, the golf course revenues are exceeding the revenue projections by over $1.1 million for a projected final annual revenue of $6 million
• The additional revenues are largely driven by the need for additional Food & Beverage supplies and Golf Merchandise. There were also additional expenses for employee costs in Food & Beverage and equipment costs for compliance with the Air Quality Management District
• The golf course is projected to exceed the Fiscal Year 2021-22 operations budget of $3.7 million by approximately $778,000 4 817

DISCUSSION
• An appropriation of $778,352 is being requested to increase the Fiscal Year 2021-22 expense budget from $3.7 million to $4.5 million • The projected revenues for Fiscal Year 2021-22 will increase from $4.8 million to $6 million
5 818

FINANCIAL IMPACT
• The additional $1,197,450 in projected golf course revenue will offset the appropriation amount of $778,352 for the Expense Budget increase for Fiscal Year 2021-22
• There is no impact to the General Fund for approval of this item 6 Golf Enterprise Fund -
AGC Budget
Adopted FY 21-22
Budget
Increased
Adjustments
Revised FY 21-22
Budget
Revenues 4,802,550 1,197,450 6,000,000
Expenditures 3,721,648 778,352 4,500,000
Net Surplus 1,080,902 419,098 1,500,000
819
QUESTIONS?
820