Written materials relating to an item on this agenda that are distributed to the legislative bodies within 72 hours before the item is to be considered at its regularly scheduled meeting will be made available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office, 300 West Third Street 4th Floor during customary business hours. Agenda reports are also on the City of Oxnard web site at www.oxnard.org.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you require special assistance to participate in a meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 385-7803. Notice at least 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to reasonably arrange for your accessibility to the meeting.
Agenda Item Time Estimates include: (Minutes for Presentation + Council Discussion + Public Comment) AGENDA
OXNARD CITY COUNCIL
OXNARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SUCCESSOR AGENCY
OXNARD FINANCING AUTHORITY
OXNARD HOUSING AUTHORITY
Meeting Location: Council Chambers, 305 West Third Street December 6, 2022
Closed Session - 5:00 PM
Regular Meeting - 6:00 PM
Zoom details to call-in for public comment during a meeting:
1. Dial Phone Number: (888) 475-4499
2. Enter Meeting ID: 846 8574 6950
3. Passcode: 105297
If you wish to speak during public comments or a particular item on the agenda, please sign-on by following the zoom calling in steps listed above. Once the presiding officer calls for public speakers, press *9 to raise your hand to inform the City Clerk you would like to speak during the public speaking section for that particular item on the agenda, while in the zoom waiting room.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 361 AND IN RESPONSE TO THE DECLARED STATE AND LOCAL EMERGENCIES DUE TO THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS, THE LEGISLATIVE BODY WILL MEET INPERSON AND REMOTELY. TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY VISIT WWW.OXNARD.ORG.
To find out how you may provide public comment, please refer to the instructions below or at www.https://www.oxnard.org/city-meetings/.
The public may view the meeting from home on Spectrum channel 10, Frontier channel 35, or YouTube at Youtube.com/oxnardnews.
Video recordings of the meeting are typically available online following the meeting at the City’s website at www.oxnard.org/citymeetings. *Please see the link for the Measure M pre-recorded presentation video for each item listed on this agenda.
YOU MAY PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING IN THE FOLLOWING WAYS:
1. ATTEND THE MEETING AT THE LOCATION LISTED ABOVE: Submit a speaker card to the City Clerk.
2. EMAIL COMMENTS OR SIGN UP TO SPEAK REMOTELY BEFORE THE MEETING a. Submit a request to speak remotely by no later than 3 p.m. on the day of the meeting by using the form available at www.oxnard.org/citymeetings.
b. Submit an email to [email protected] no later than 3 p.m. on the day of the meeting (indicate the agenda item number in the subject line). All email correspondence will be forwarded to the legislative body prior to the start of the meeting and made part of the legislative record.
c. Contact the City Clerk’s Office at (805) 385-7803 to submit your request. 1 OXNARD CITY COUNCIL OXNARD FINANCING AUTHORITY HOUSING AUTHORITY
OXNARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SUCCESSOR AGENCY December 6, 2022 PAGE 2
3. PROVIDING PUBLIC COMMENTS REMOTELY DURING THE MEETING a. To provide public comment during the meeting dial (888) 475-4499 and enter the Meeting ID and Passcode listed above as the Zoom details for this meeting. When the presiding officer announces the particular item on the agenda you want to speak on, press *9 to raise your hand while in the zoom waiting room. Once called on, press *6 to unmute your phone.
b. Public comments on agenda items will be taken following the announcement of the item. After the item is announced, members of the public may register or otherwise be recognized for the purpose of providing public comment.
Please review the Zoom instructions on the registration page to help ensure there are no technical difficulties during your comments and help you understand public comment procedures using Zoom. Detailed participation instructions can be found at www.oxnard.org/city-meetings.
In the event of a disruption which prevents a legislative body of the City of Oxnard from broadcasting a meeting using a callin option or internet-based service option, or in the event of a disruption within the City’s control which prevents members of the public from offering public comment using the call-in option or internet-based service option, the legislative body shall take no further action on items appearing on a meeting agenda until public access to the meeting via the call-in option or internet-based service option is restored. However, if any of the broadcast options are disrupted, but any of the other broadcast options is still available to the public, the legislative body may take further action on items appearing on a meeting agenda without waiting for the disrupted broadcast option(s) to be restored. * The City has filed pre-election and post-election lawsuits regarding the validity of Measure M.
A. ROLL CALL, POSTING OF AGENDA
THE FOLLOWING LEGISLATIVE BODIES ARE MEETING: City Council B. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
C. CLOSED SESSION (5:00 PM)
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION (Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1))
City of Oxnard v. Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCP00929, a Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief.
D. OPENING CEREMONIES (6:00 PM)
Pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States.
E. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
A person may address the legislative body only on matters not appearing on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body. Speaker requests shall be submitted as set forth on the first page of this agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes. After 30 minutes, if all speakers have not had the opportunity to speak, the remaining speakers will be given an opportunity to speak prior to adjournment of the meeting. The legislative body cannot enter into a detailed discussion or take action on any items presented during public comments at this time. Such items may only be referred to the City Manager/Executive Director/Secretary for administrative action or scheduled on a subsequent agenda for discussion. Persons wishing to speak on public hearing items should do so at the time of the hearing.
F. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETARY
2 OXNARD CITY COUNCIL OXNARD FINANCING AUTHORITY HOUSING AUTHORITY
OXNARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SUCCESSOR AGENCY December 6, 2022 PAGE 3
1. City Manager Department
SUBJECT: COVID-19 Update from Director of Emergency Services.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council re-authorize remote teleconference meetings of the legislative bodies of the City of Oxnard in accordance with Assembly Bill 361 based on the following findings: (i) the current COVID-19 situation, particularly with its variants, is causing, and will continue to cause, imminent risks to the health and safety of persons within the City, including City Council members, City staff, appointed officials, and members of the public; (ii) state and local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; and (iii) the Governor's COVID-19 State of Emergency is still in effect; and (iv) numerous public agencies throughout Ventura County are still operating in accordance with Assembly 361, for the reasons stated herein.
Legislative Body: City Council
Contact: Stephen Fischer, (805) 385-7483
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Appeal of Planning and Zoning Permit No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit); Undeveloped parcel (approximately 34 acres) located at the southeast corner of Hueneme Road and Perkins Road; APNs: 231-0-092-105 and 231-0-092-245 Project Name: Port of Hueneme - Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. (240 minutes) RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a public hearing and:
1. Adopt a Resolution certifying Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 22-01 for the Port of Hueneme - Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility (Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse No. 2020069039); and
2. Adopt a Resolution denying the appeal and uploading the Planning Commission’s decision to grant Planning and Zoning Permit No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) for a vehicle storage facility, subject to certain findings and conditions. (This item did not originate in Committee.)
Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video: https://youtu.be/i2vFQjFenYA
Legislative Body: City Council
Contact: Ashley Golden, (805) 385-7478
H. ADJOURNMENT
3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM NO. G.1
DATE: December 6, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Ashley Golden, Assistant City Manager, (805) 385-7478, [email protected] SUBJECT: Appeal of Planning and Zoning Permit No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit); Undeveloped parcel (approximately 34 acres) located at the southeast corner of Hueneme Road and Perkins Road; APNs:
231-0-092-105 and 231-0-092-245 Project Name: Port of Hueneme - Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. (240 minutes)
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council conduct a public hearing and:
1. Adopt a Resolution certifying Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 22-01 for the Port of Hueneme - Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility (Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse No. 2020069039); and
2. Adopt a Resolution denying the appeal and uploading the Planning Commission’s decision to grant Planning and Zoning Permit No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) for a vehicle storage facility, subject to certain findings and conditions.
(This item did not originate in Committee.)
Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video: https://youtu.be/i2vFQjFenYA
BACKGROUND
On October 20, 2022, the Planning Commission (the “Commission”) held a public hearing to consider Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 22-01 and Planning and Zoning Permit No. 18-500-02 requesting approval of a Special Use Permit (SUP). The project scope involves a temporary outdoor vehicle storage facility for a maximum of five years on an approximately 34-acre project site. The facility includes the following: vehicle parking area with gravel base, temporary guard house (240 square feet), portable restroom, perimeter site lighting, security fencing (6-feet-high), landscaping, site drainage, and associated infrastructure improvements (i.e., curb cuts, apron, etc.). The temporary outdoor vehicle storage facility includes approximately 27.5 parkable acres to accommodate up to 4,944 vehicle spaces, which equates to a ratio of 180 spaces per acre. Upon expiration of the Special Use Permit, the vehicle parking area, the guard house, portable restroom, perimeter site lighting, and gravel surface would be removed. The 6-foot-high fencing, landscaping, and drainage and associated infrastructure improvements would remain on-site and be maintained by the property owner. The project site is located at the southeast corner of Hueneme Road and Perkins Road. Staff presented the project with a recommendation for approval to the Planning Commission (Attachment 1).
At the public hearing, the Commission heard public testimony, deliberated, and voted 4-1, with two Commissioners recused, to adopt the resolutions certifying the EIR (Attachment 3) and approving the requested SUP (Attachment 4).
Pursuant to Sections 16-544 and 16-545 of the Oxnard City Code (“OCC”), the action of the Planning Commission is 4 final unless an appeal application to the City Council is filed within 18 days after the date of the decision. On November 7, 2022, the Appellant (The Central Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy, Earthjustice, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Wishtoyo Chumash Foundation) filed a timely Appeal application with the City (Attachment 5).
DISCUSSION
The Appellant appealed the decision of the Planning Commission based on five grounds of appeal. The Appellant's five grounds of appeal are noted below, verbatim, with staff’s response following each ground of appeal:
Ground of Appeal 1:
The FEIR is replete with inconsistencies, omissions, and misrepresentations of facts by the Oxnard Harbor District and the Lead Agency that tainted environmental review.
The FEIR has several inconsistencies. During the October 20, 2022 Planning Commission hearing, these inconsistencies were once again made evident in the answers given by the Oxnard Harbor District (hereinafter “Applicant” or “Port”) and the Lead Agency to questions by the Commission. The Commission abused its discretion by ignoring these inconsistencies and certifying the FEIR. A table of these inconsistencies is attached as Exhibit A.
Staff Response:
Staff disagrees with Ground of Appeal 1, as the Appellant refers to statements from the one Commissioner who voted against staff recommendations. The Planning Commission is comprised of seven members. The statements of the one Commissioner who voted against staff recommendations are not the findings of the Planning Commission, as the Planning Commission voted 4-1 to follow staff recommendations. Therefore, the findings of the Planning Commission are the findings discussed in the Planning Commission Staff Report.
The Planning Commission listened to several hours of testimony, considered the entire record, deliberated, and voted 4-1 to certify the EIR and grant the SUP. Thus, any “contradictory” statements from individual Commissioners, staff, applicants, the public and others were considered by the Planning Commission.
The topics discussed in this Ground of Appeal are addressed in the Final EIR as follows: piecemealing is addressed in Global Response GR-3; cumulative impacts and growth are addressed in Global Response GR-8, Section 4, and Section 7; project description and project surroundings are addressed Section 3; alternatives are addressed in Global Response GR-7 and Section 6.
Ground of Appeal 2:
The Commission erred in certifying a flawed Environmental Impact Report.
The Commission certified an FEIR that failed to comply with CEQA and contained numerous flaws that made it unreliable as an environmental review document. These flaws include unlawful piecemealing of the Project; failure to assess the cumulative impacts; failure to consider reasonable alternatives that would avoid building a parking lot near environmental justice communities and sensitive habitats such as wetlands; failure to properly mitigate environmental impacts, as well as inaccurate and inconsistent assessment of impacts related to traffic, air pollution, biological resources, cultural resources, toxic hazards, and environmental justice. As a result, Oxnard residents and this City Council have been deprived of the necessary information and analysis concerning this Project’s true near and long-term environmental impact.
Staff Response:
Staff disagrees with Ground of Appeal 2, as these topics discussed in this Ground of Appeal are addressed in the Final EIR as follows: piecemealing is addressed in Global Response GR-3; cumulative impacts are addressed in Global Response GR-8 and Section 4; alternatives are addressed in Global Response GR-7 and Section 6; traffic impacts are addressed in Global Response GR-4, Global Response GR-6, and Section 5.19; air quality impacts are addressed in Section 5.3; biology impacts are addressed in Section 5.4; cultural impacts are addressed in Section 5.5; hazards are addressed in Section 5.9, and environmental justice is addressed in Global Response GR-5.
Ground of Appeal 3:
Public engagement and outreach failed to provide a meaningful opportunity for public comment by ignoring clear 5 language access barriers.
Despite knowing that the impacted South Oxnard neighborhoods have a high percentage of households where English is not a dominant language, and after hearing numerous calls to translate the FEIR documents and provide simultaneous interpretation of public workshops and
hearings, the Lead Agency refused to do so—creating additional barriers to meaningful participation in the environmental review process.
Staff Response:
Staff disagrees with Ground of Appeal 3, as this ground was the subject of many comment letters regarding the Draft EIR that were addressed in the Final EIR. Staff prepared Global Response GR-2 to respond to these multiple letters. Thus, staff prepared the EIR pursuant to CEQA. The Planning Division has Spanish speakers that regularly interact with the public. To date, no one has requested a Spanish speaker to discuss the Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Project. Furthermore, during the Planning Commission Hearing, translators were available to translate testimony from Spanish to English. During the Planning Commission Hearing, no one provided testimony in a language other than English. Therefore, the City did not provide barriers to public participation, as the City provided many additional opportunities for public participation in the Planning process.
Ground of Appeal 4:
Questions remain as to the temporary nature of this Project and concrete steps for fixing this issue remain vague.
During the October 20, 2022 Planning Commission hearing, commissioners raised concerns regarding the temporary nature of the Project and the site’s future remediation. For example, Commissioner Arruejo stated, “I do have ...serious concerns that it may not be temporary or even if it is that the cleanup will not happen in the manner that is put in the conditions of approval and so I intend to offer an amendment to ensure that there is more confidence by the community and Planning Commission that there is going to be a cleanup.” Additional concerns were raised by Commissioner Nash, who stated, “I do not find this Project as being a reasonable manner of preserving, protecting, providing for, and fostering the health safety and welfare of the citizenry in general, and the persons who work, visit, or live in this development in particular.” This was especially concerning in light of the Port’s admission that they are anticipating “one and a half million” in restoration costs, that should not be borne by the taxpayer. Residents and City leaders deserve to know how the site might continue to impact the region in the years ahead. Concrete plans need to be in place to address these serious concerns. For example, the final resolution could include amendments explaining how restoration should be carried out (e.g., including access points to the beach in South Oxnard, wetlands restoration, and consideration of how it the restored area could become an educational site where residents can learn and connect to the land), which experts the Lead Agency will work with to ensure sensitive habitats and species are adequately considered, what process will be in place to engage the surrounding community in developing the restoration plans, and who would bear final restoration costs.
Staff Response:
Staff disagrees with Ground of Appeal 4, as the Planning Commission granted the SUP subject to conditions of approval and Condition No. 57 requires that upon the expiration of the five year permit life, the site is returned to its existing condition. Since the Planning Commission expressed concerns regarding the site’s return to its existing condition within a timely manner, the Planning Commission amended the staff recommended Condition No. 57 to require a bond to return the site to its existing condition (with the exception of the drainage improvements, landscaping, and fencing which shall remain on the site and be maintained by the property owner). Since the project site is not located within the Coastal Zone and therefore not subject to the California Coastal Commission coastal access requirements, there is not a nexus for the project site property owner to be required to provide coastal access for this temporary project. In addition, a nexus does not exist to require off-site wetlands remediation or a dedication of a portion of the site for an educational site.
Ground of Appeal 5:
The Commission made its decision based on an incomplete record.
The Lead Agency should have ensured that the Commission had all necessary information available before the Commissioners heard the matter and voted. Yet, despite many requests to ensure a complete record, several key items were still missing prior to the hearing—calling into question whether Commissioners had all records necessary to decide the matter properly.
6 Staff Response:
Staff disagrees with Ground of Appeal 5, as the record that was presented to the Planning Commission included the complete Final EIR. The Appellant states that four comment letters regarding the Draft EIR were not included in the Final EIR. Those comment letter are as follows: 1) Letter from Mati Waiya, Tevin Schmitt, and Eva Pagaling to Jay Dobrowalski dated February 14, 2022; 2) Letter from Christina Zubko to Jay Dobrowalski dated February 10, 2022; 3) Letter from Nancy Lindholm to Chair Daniel Chavez and members of the Planning Commission dated February 14, 2022; and 4) Letter from Carolina Gallardo Magaña & Southwinds Neighborhood Council to Jay Dobrowalski dated February 14, 2022. These four letters are included in the Final EIR and that was published on the Planning Division website on October 12, 2022 and was attached to the Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 20, 2022.
Conclusion:
The Appellant requests the Planning Commission decision to certify the EIR and grant the SUP be overturned based on several grounds.
Based on the previous discussion (see above Analysis Section), staff recommends that City Council find there is no merit to the Appellant’s Grounds of Appeal, deny the Appeal and uphold the decision of the Planning Commission to certify the Environmental Impact Report and grant the Special Use Permit for a vehicle storage facility. Subject to certain findings and conditions. Pursuant to OCC Section 16-551, the decision of the City Council is final.
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item supports Economic Development strategy. The purpose of Economic Development strategy is to focus on the retention and expansion of Oxnard businesses by increasing the skills and employability of our local workforce, invite new business investments, and target site-based redevelopment opportunities.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Denial of the requested Appeal would uphold the Planning Commission's approval and allow for the redevelopment of the project site, and, if redeveloped, the Project may generate additional tax revenue in an amount that is undetermined at this time.
COMMITTEE OUTCOME
This item is a public hearing and was heard by the Planning Commission; therefore, this item did not originate in Committee.
Prepared by: Joe Pearson II, AICP, Principal Planner, Jay Dobrowalski, Planning Supervisor
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 20, 2022
2. Planning Commission Transmittal Memos (Public Comments)
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2022-35
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2022-36
5. Appeal Form with Grounds of Appeal submitted by Appellant dated November 7, 2022
6. Draft City Council CEQA Resolution
7. Draft City Council SUP Resolution
8. Presentation
7 PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Jay Dobrowalski, Planning Supervisor
DATE: October 20, 2022
SUBJECT: Project Name: Port of Hueneme - Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; Planning and Zoning Permit No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit); Undeveloped parcel located at the southeast corner of Hueneme Road and Perkins Road; APNs: 231-0-092-105 and 231-0-092-245
1) Recommendation: That the Planning Commission (“Commission”):
a) Adopt a Resolution certifying Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 22-01 for the Port of Hueneme - Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility (Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse No. 2020069039); and b) Adopt a Resolution approving Planning and Zoning Permit No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) for a vehicle storage facility, subject to certain findings and conditions. 2) Project Description and Applicant: The applicant requests a permit to construct and operate a temporary outdoor vehicle storage facility for a maximum of five years on an approximately 34-acre project site. The facility includes the following: vehicle parking area with gravel base, temporary guard house (240 square feet), portable restroom, perimeter site lighting, security fencing (6-feet-high), landscaping, site drainage, and associated infrastructure improvements (i.e., curb cuts, apron, etc.). The temporary outdoor vehicle storage facility includes approximately 27.5 parkable acres to accommodate up to 4,944 vehicle spaces, which equates to a ratio of 180 spaces per acre. Upon expiration of the Special Use Permit, the vehicle parking area, the guard house, portable restroom, perimeter site lighting, and gravel surface would be removed. The 6-foot-high fencing, landscaping, and drainage and associated infrastructure improvements would remain on-site and be maintained by the property owner.
The request includes certification of the proposed Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 22-01 (State Clearinghouse No. 2020069039) and approval of the Findings of Fact and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) which has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Public Resources Code (California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et seq.).
8 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
The project site is located at the southeast corner of Hueneme Road and Perkins Road (APNs: 231-0-092-105 and 231-0-092-245) within the Light Manufacturing with Planned Development Additive Zone (M-1-PD) (Attachment A). For purposes of this staff report, the foregoing project description shall be referred to as the “Project.” Filed by Christina Birdsey, 333 Ponoma Street, Port Hueneme, California 93044-0608, designated agent (the “Applicant”) on behalf of A&J Oxnard LLC, 18980 Ventura Boulevard, Unit 200, Tarzana, California 91356 (the “Property Owner”).
Please see the reduced Project plans (Attachment B) for more details. 3) Existing & Surrounding Land Uses: The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped.
The Project site is not located in a 2030 General Plan identified neighborhood. The following table lists and identifies the General Plan Land Use Designations, Zoning Designations, and existing land uses of the Project site and properties immediately adjacent to the site, which are also illustrated in Attachment A:
Table 1
Existing and Surrounding Land Uses
LOCATION GENERAL
PLAN ZONING EXISTING LAND USE
Project Site
Industrial Limited
(ILT), Park
(PRK)
Light Manufacturing
Zone with Planned
Development
Additive Zone
(M-1-PD)
Vacant and undeveloped
North
Commercial
General (CG),
Residential
Medium High
(RMH),
Residential Low
(RL), Residential
Medium (RM),
School (SCH),
and Park (PRK)
Single Family
Residential with
Planned Development
Additie Zone (R-1
PD), Multiple Family
Residential with
Planned Development
Additive Zone (R-2
PD), Garden
Apartment with
Planned Development
Additive Zone (R-3
PD), High-Rise
Residential (R-4),
Hueneme Road is adjacent to and
north of the project site. Commercial
uses are located north of the project
site across Hueneme Road, and
residential, school, and park uses are
located north of the commercial uses.
9 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
Community Reserve
(CR), General
Commercial All
Affordable Housing
Permitted
(C-2-AHP),
Neighborhood
Shopping Center with
Planned Development
Additive Zone, All
Affordable Housing
Permitted (C-1
PD-AHP)
South
Industry Priority
to Coastal
Development
(ICD), Resource
Protection (RP)
Coastal Development
Industrial (CDI),
Coastal Reserve
Protection (RP),
Coastal Recreation
(RC)
The Ventura County Railway (VCRR)
line is located immediately adjacent to
the southeastern portion of the project
site. The City of Oxnard Advanced
Water Purification Facility is located
north of the VCRR and immediately
adjacent to the southwestern portion
of the project site. South and east of
the VCRR is the Ormond Lagoon
Waterway and vacant and
undeveloped land that is currently in
the conceptual planning stages for
future wetland restoration.
East
Industrial Light
(ILT), Resource
Protection (RP)
Light Manufacturing
with Planned
Development
Additive Zone
(M-1-PD) and
Coastal Resource
Protection (RP)
Vacant and undeveloped land. A
3-acre trailer truck storage facility is
proposed for this land, and is currently
in the land permit process.
West
Industry Priority
to Coastal
Development
(ICD),
Commercial
General (CG)
Coast Development
Industrial (CDI),
General Commercial
(C-2), High-Rise
Residential (R-4)
Coastal dependent industrial uses
10 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
4) Background Information: The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped. The Project site has been subject to discretionary development as follows:
On July 20, 1995, the Land Use Advisors (the decision making body that was later renamed as the Planning Commission) recommended that the City Council approve a tentative subdivision map (Tract No. 987). The application included a zone change (No. 805), tentative tract map (Tract No. 4987), and a Special Use Permit (No. 1473). Prior to the City Council public hearing, the application was withdrawn.
On January 8, 2002, the City Council reviewed a Pre-Application submittal to develop the 38-acre site with a vehicle preparation facility that included several structures for a total of 95,000 square-feet of floor area. Subsequently, the application was formally submitted.
On August 5, 2002, the Planning Commission granted a Special Use Permit (Planning and Zoning Permit No. 02-500-09) for the development of a vehicle processing and distribution facility that included several buildings for a total of approximately 100,000 square-feet of floor area, and adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (Planning and Zoning Permit No.
MND 02-08) to determine that the proposed project would not result in a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission also recommended that City Council approve a General Plan Amendment (Planning and Zoning Permit No. 02-620-2) to change the General Plan designation of the site from Medium Density Residential and Commercial to Light Industrial to be consistent with the site zoning designation of Light Industrial.
On October 1, 2002, the City Council granted an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and grant the Special Use Permit, and directed staff to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the proposed project.
Subsequently, the application was withdrawn.
On March 20, 2008, the Planning Commission granted a Special Use Permit (Planning and Zoning Permit No. 07-500-13) for the development of the Groundwater Recovery Enhancement and Treatment Program Advanced Water Purification Facility on a 4.65-acre site that used to be part of the 34-acre project site. The Planning Commission also recommended that the City Council approve a General Plan Amendment (Planning and Zoning Permit No. 08-620-01) to change the General Plan designation of the site from Residential Medium to Light Industrial to be consistent with the site zoning designation of Light Industrial.
On April 14, 2008, the City Council upheld the Planning Commission’s decision to grant the Special Use Permit and also approved the General Plan Amendment. Subsequently, the water facility was developed and is currently in operation.
On March 29, 2018, the applicant submitted the current application for a Special Use Permit for the proposed temporary vehicle storage facility.
11 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
5) Environmental Determination: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15060, the City of Oxnard as the Lead Agency, prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) in accordance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. The MND identified and discussed potential impacts, mitigation measures, monitoring requirements, and residual impacts for identified subject areas. The MND was available for public review from December 13, 2018 to January 14, 2019, but was extended to January 31, 2019. The City of Oxnard received over 220 comment letters on the MND from agencies, organizations, and interested parties. In response to the areas of concern identified in those letters, the City, at its own discretion, elected to prepare an EIR for the proposed project.
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15060, the City of Oxnard as the Lead Agency, has prepared an EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2020069039) in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public resources Code § 21000, et seq.), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 California Code of Regulations, §15000, et seq., CEQA Guidelines), and the City’s Environmental Review Guidelines (Attachment C). The EIR identifies and discusses potential impacts, mitigation measures, monitoring requirements, and residual impacts for identified subject areas.
The Draft EIR (DEIR) identified the potential environmental impacts of the proposed development and was available for public review from December 16, 2021 to February 14, 2022 (a total of 61 days), however only a 45 day public review period was required. During the public review period, the City received over 200 comments. As a result of the comments received, revisions were made to the DEIR to form the Final EIR (FEIR). The written comments and responses to each of those comments received during the public review period of the DEIR are included in the FEIR. The DEIR revisions are discussed in the FEIR (Section 1.1).
The FEIR did not identify any significant and unavoidable (Class 1) impacts (impacts that cannot be reduced to a less than significant level). The FEIR identifies potentially significant but mitigable (Class 2) impacts (impacts that can be reduced to a less than significant level with mitigation measures) and less than significant (Class 3) impacts (impacts that do not require mitigation measures because the proposed project will not have a significant impact).
The FEIR concludes that after implementation of standard conditions and mitigation measures, all potentially significant impacts associated with the proposed project would be reduced to less than significant levels. The FEIR includes a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Section 11) that details the process to implement the required mitigation measures.
Therefore, staff has determined that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment and recommends that the Planning Commission certify that: (1) The final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA; (2) The final 12 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
EIR was presented to the decision-making body of the lead agency, and that the decision-making body reviewed and considered the information contained in the final EIR prior to approving the project; and (3) The final EIR reflects the lead agency‘s independent judgment and analysis.
6) Project Analysis:
a) General Discussion:
The applicant requests a permit to construct and operate a temporary outdoor vehicle storage facility for a maximum of five years on the approximately 34-acre project site.
The facility includes the following: vehicle parking area with gravel base, temporary guard house (240 square feet), portable restroom, perimeter site lighting, security fencing (6-feet-high), landscaping, site drainage, and associated infrastructure improvements (i.e., curb cuts, apron, etc.). The temporary outdoor vehicle storage facility includes approximately 27.5 parkable acres to accommodate up to 4,944 vehicle spaces, which equates to a ratio of 180 spaces per acre. Upon expiration of the Special Use Permit, the vehicle parking area, the guard house, portable restroom, perimeter site lighting, and gravel surface would be removed. The 6-foot-high fencing, landscaping, and drainage and associated infrastructure improvements would remain on-site and be maintained by the property owner.
The temporary outdoor storage facility is being requested because the auto shipping logistics market is highly competitive and subject to larger global economic trends. The Port of Hueneme and its customers are subject to those trends as auto industry sales rise and fall with the economy. The auto industry is predicting national car sales reductions of two to three percent annually in the next several years. The Port anticipates reductions in car throughputs as a result of this economic trend, and this project would help to create storage space for up to 30,000 cars annually, which would offset an anticipated throughput reduction of approximately the same number of vehicles.
The Port is seeking to facilitate the success of one of its customers, GLOVIS, so that GLOVIS’ operations remain at Port Hueneme. GLOVIS does not own land near the Port and instead leases land from the United States Navy at NVBC Port Hueneme. Thus, the Port of Hueneme is acting as project sponsor to assist GLOVIS in consolidating its current off-Port vehicle storage operations with this project to make its operations more efficient. Additionally, jobs for 14 new employees would be created as a direct result of this project. New cars that would be stored at the vehicle storage facility would not require additional ships to arrive at the Port, because the current fleets of scheduled vessels have enough capacity to add cars without any need for additional vessel calls.
Any increased volume of new vehicles is anticipated to be offset by the softening of the market for other auto customer vehicles moving through the Port. 13 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
Pursuant to Oxnard City Code (OCC) §16-163, the proposed vehicle storage facility located within the M-1 Zone District requires a Special Use Permit. Pursuant to OCC §16-536, the Planning Commission is the decision maker for the requested Special Use Permit.
b) General Plan Consistency: The City’s 2030 General Plan land use designations for the subject site are Industrial Limited (ILT) and Park (PRK). The Industrial Limited designation allows the following land uses: light manufacturing, assembly, work/live, and warehousing uses developed to high performance and development standards. All activity occurs within buildings with the exception of incidental outdoor uses. The Park designation allows the following land uses: City, County, State, and National-owned parks, beaches, regional parks, community parks, neighborhood parks, special purpose facilities, golf courses, athletic fields, and open space areas.
The proposed project includes the development of temporary structures for temporary vehicle storage. Given the temporary use of the site for outdoor vehicle storage for a maximum of five years and that the proposed project does not include permanent structures, the proposed project does not preclude future development for park land or other industrial land uses. Thus, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan Industrial Limited and Park designations. As shown in Attachment D, the approval of this project has been determined to be consistent with the 2030 General Plan and the property’s land use designation.
c) Conformance with Zoning Code Development Standards: The proposed development is located within the Light Manufacturing Zone with Planned Development Additive Zone (M-1-PD) zone district and is subject to the Light Manufacturing (M-1) development standards.
The proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the M-1 development standards.
As shown in Attachment E, the Project is designed to be consistent with the development standards.
d) Site Design, Circulation, and Parking: The primary access to the proposed vehicle storage facility would be from two entrance/exit driveways on Perkins Road. Both driveways would include a Knox Box for emergency access, and would remain upon expiration of the Special Use Permit. In addition, one emergency access driveway at the terminus of Saviers Road at Hueneme Road would be provided. This emergency access driveway would also include a Knox Box for emergency access, and would remain upon expiration of the Special Use Permit.
The vehicle storage facility includes 12 employee parking spaces, a temporary guard house, and a portable restroom located in the northwestern corner of the facility and drainage improvements located in the southeastern area of the facility. The rest of the 14 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
project site will be used for vehicle storage on a gravel surface. The gravel surface will be removed upon expiration of the requested Special Use Permit.
The facility includes nine drive aisles that cross the facility from west to east and three drive aisles that cross the facility from north to south. All of the drive aisles will be 25 feet wide to accommodate emergency vehicles. The vehicle storage area will have vehicles stored in rows that cross the site from west to east. The facility includes a storage area for a maximum of 4,944 vehicles.
Vehicles would be individually driven to the vehicle storage facility in groups of ten at a time. No vehicle carrier trucks would be used to load or offload vehicles at the facility.
The vehicle fleet mix traveling to and from the vehicle storage facility would include only passenger cars and shuttle vans; no semi-trucks or other heavy transports would be used. The typical vehicle movement operation for this facility would involve two different actions: 1) vehicles arriving at the facility and 2) vehicles leaving the facility.
Vehicles to be stored at the vehicle storage facility would be driven from the vehicle processing area on Naval Base Ventura County (NBVC) Port Hueneme property, out through the NBVC Pleasant Valley gate and would head south on Ventura Road and then turn east on Hueneme Road. These vehicles would be driven east on Hueneme Road to Perkins Road where they would turn south onto Perkins Road and east into the vehicle storage facility via the access driveways on Perkins Road.
Vehicles stored at the vehicle storage facility would be started in groups of up to ten at a time and would be driven out of the facility and turn north onto Perkins Road. The cars would then turn west onto Hueneme Road and drive west toward the Port, where they would turn north onto Ventura Road to enter NBVC Port Hueneme at the Pleasant Valley gate and drive through to the NBVC Port Hueneme vehicle processing area. When cars leave the vehicle storage facility, they would return to NBVC Port Hueneme for processing from where they enter the existing commerce stream of delivery to auto dealers in eight western states via locomotives and car-carrier trucks. This distribution method is the same as that currently used for all automobiles that are imported through the Port, and because this vehicle storage facility would not result in an increase in the throughput of vehicles and would only keep up with existing capacities, there would be no change in the impacts associated with delivering these cars to market. The vehicles would be stored at the vehicle storage facility, and the process would repeat until the vehicles (a maximum of 240 vehicles per day) have been moved from the Port to the facility. The entire process of driving from the Port to the vehicle storage facility and returning to the Port takes approximately 20 minutes.
e) Building Design: The vehicle storage facility includes a 240-square-foot temporary guard house/office trailer, and a portable restroom located in the northwestern corner of the facility. The guard house/office trailer would be used for 24-hour security services 15 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
and the restroom would be available only for on-site personnel, and would be serviced as needed by a waste services provider.
The facility also includes 19 solar-powered, mobile, low-intensity LED tower light fixtures along the perimeter. The light fixtures are approximately 20 feet in height and would provide security lighting for the project site that is inward facing, downcast, and shielded. The placement of the lights is intended to minimize lighting impacts to the natural habitat south of the project site and would meet the City’s security and Code standards for site lighting.
The guard house/office trailer, portable restroom, and mobile light fixtures will be mostly screened from the adjacent roadways. The site will be screened by a 6-foot-high chain-link fence and landscaping, so the top portion of the structures will be visible from the adjacent roadways.
The guard house/office trailer, portable restroom, and mobile light fixtures will be removed upon expiration of the requested Special Use Permit. f) Landscaping: The project site would be screened with a 6-foot-high chain-link fence and native landscaping around the perimeter.
The project site is located along Hueneme Road, which is a City designated scenic roadway. As such, the General Plan requires a 30-foot landscape buffer. The northern side of the project site frontage along Hueneme Road includes a 30-foot landscaping buffer as follows: the first 20 feet (adjacent to the roadway) will be planted with groundcover and the next 10 feet will be planted with native landscaping. The landscaping will be located in front of a 6-foot-high chain-link fence. The emergency access driveway located across from the southern terminus of Saviers Road will be paved for vehicle access.
The project site is also located along Perkins Road. Perkins Road is not a City-designated scenic roadway. The western side of the project site frontage along Perkins Road includes landscaping as follows: the first 15 feet (adjacent to the roadway) will be left vacant and the next 10 feet will be planted with native landscaping. The landscaping will be located in front of a 6-foot-high chain-link fence. The two driveways located along Perkins Road will be paved for vehicle access.
The eastern side of the project site (facing the adjacent trucking operation) includes landscaping as follows: inside the property line, the first 10 feet will be planted with native landscaping. The landscaping will be located on the inside of a 6-foot-high chain-link fence (the fence will be located along the property line).
The southern side of the project site (facing the adjacent railroad tracks) includes landscaping as follows: the southern edge of the property will be planted with native 16 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
landscaping to grow on a chain-link fence. The landscaping will be located on the inside of a 6-foot-high chain-link fence (the fence will be located along the property line).
The 6-foot-high chain-link fence and landscaping will remain on the site upon expiration of the requested Special Use Permit and will be maintained by the property owner. The Landscape Plans are provided in Attachment B.
g) Project Operations:
Vehicles would be driven to and from the facility Monday through Saturday, between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. Nighttime operations would not occur. The vehicle storage facility would be staffed 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for security purposes.
The vehicle storage facility would be staffed by 14 employees: 3 security guards, up to 10 vehicle drivers, and 1 shuttle van driver. Vehicle-moving employees (vehicle and shuttle van drivers) would arrive at the vehicle storage facility between 7:30 to 8:00 a.m. and would leave the facility no later than 4:00 p.m. The three security guards would each work an 8-hour shift, such that one security guard would remain on-site at all times. A maximum of three parking spaces would be dedicated solely for employee parking. The vehicle drivers would not park their personal vehicles at the vehicle storage facility; they would arrive via shuttle when vehicles need removing or via cars being driven to the site for storage.
The vehicle storage facility would serve as an off-site storage lot for vehicles that could not be stored at GLOVIS’ current facility at NBVC Port Hueneme due to a lack of space while still allowing GLOVIS to accommodate its customers, including Hyundai, Kia, GM, and Honda, as well as electric vehicles. The vehicles would remain at the facility for several weeks to several months, depending on market conditions. When it is necessary for GLOVIS to process the vehicles, drivers would use a van to drive from the GLOVIS facility to the vehicle storage facility, then drive each vehicle back to NBVC Port Hueneme to be processed and then transported by either truck or rail to GLOVIS customers in the United States. The vehicles would utilize the same travel route back to the GLOVIS’ facility at NVBC Port Hueneme from the vehicle storage facility.
The vehicle storage facility would function under the operating scenario described below.
A maximum of 240 vehicles per day would be transported to or from The Port of Hueneme to the vehicle storage facility. Most days the vehicle storage facility would see small numbers of vehicle moves. However, many days the facility would see no vehicle movements at all. All vehicles stored at this vehicle storage facility would be light duty vehicles; no trucks or diesel-powered vehicles would be stored at this facility. The rate of vehicles entering or leaving the facility would not exceed 30 cars per hour for 8 hours daily, or 240 vehicle trips (one way) per day. The vehicles would be individually driven to or from the vehicle storage facility and would not require the use of transport trucks. 17 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
It is planned that the movement of vehicles to and from the vehicle storage facility would follow that of similar storage areas that currently support Port customer automobile operations where groups of ten vehicles are moved at a time by a crew of ten drivers who are transported to the cars via a shuttle van. The ten vehicle drivers and the shuttle van driver would report to The Port of Hueneme, and the ten vehicle drivers would each individually drive a vehicle to the facility. The shuttle van would follow the vehicles to the facility.
h) Project Lighting:
Nineteen solar powered, mobile, low-intensity LED tower light fixtures would be placed along the perimeter of the property. The light fixtures are approximately 20 feet in height and would provide security lighting for the project site that is inward facing, downcast, and shielded. The placement of the lights is intended to minimize lighting impacts to the natural habitat south of the project site and would meet the City’s security and Code standards for site lighting. These mobile light fixtures would be removed upon expiration of the Special Use Permit.
7) Development Advisory Committee: On April 25, 2018, the Project was reviewed by the Development Advisory Committee (DAC) which resulted in changes to the project and recommended conditions of approval. The DAC conditions of approval are included in the attached Resolution.
8) Community Workshop: On November 19, 2018 and March 21, 2022, the Project was presented to the public during a Community Workshop meeting. Although the project site is not located within a General Plan Neighborhood, the applicant mailed notice of the meeting to residents within the Southwinds and Cypress Neighborhoods. Notice of the meeting was also posted on the site at two separate locations. During the meetings, commenters submitted verbal and written testimony. The comments were generally related to the following topics:
air quality impacts, biology impacts, land use incompatibility, traffic impacts, inadequate public participation opportunities, environmental justice, and inadequate environmental review. These public comments are the same as the comments that have been addressed in the EIR.
9) Noticing and Public Comments: Consistent with public noticing requirements, the Planning Commission Hearing was advertised with on-site postings in two locations and by mail to property owners within 300 feet of Project Site. Following the end of the public comment period for the Draft EIR the City received 45 comments on the project. The public comment letters submitted following the end of the Draft EIR public comment period are attached (Attachment F). Since the release of the notice of this public hearing, Planning Staff has received no other inquiries from the public regarding the proposed Project. 18 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
10) Appeal Procedure: In accordance with Section 16-545 of the Oxnard City Code, the Planning Commission’s action may be appealed to the City Council within 18 days after the decision date. Appeal forms may be obtained from the City Clerk and must be submitted with the appropriate fees before the end of the appeal period. If an appeal to the City Council is not filed within 18 days of the Planning Commission’s decision, the decision of the Planning Commission shall be considered final.
Attachments:
A. Maps (Vicinity, General Plan, Zoning, Aerial)
B. Reduced Project Plans
C. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 22-01
D. General Plan Consistency Table
E. Zoning Code Development Standards Consistency Table
F. Public Comment Letters
G. Draft Planning Commission Resolution Certifying Environmental Impact Report No. 22-01
H. Draft Planning Commission Resolution Approving Planning and Zoning Permit No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit)
I. Staff Presentation
19 Attachment:
A. Maps (Vicinity, General Plan, Zoning, Aerial)
20 FIFTH ST H ST
C ST
VENTURA RD
OXNARD BLVD
RICE AVE
HUENEME RD
J ST
GONZALES RD
VINEYARD AVE
WOOLEY RD
BARD RD
101 FRWY
SAVIERS RD
DORIS AVE
CENTRAL AVE
ROSE AVE
CASPER RD
THIRD ST
CAMINO DEL SOL
23RD AVE
BRISTOL RD
ARNOLD RD
NINTH ST
OLIVAS PARK DR
WEST RD
NAUMAN RD
TEAL CLUB RD
PERIMETER RD
HARBOR BLVD
MARKET ST
G ST
OCEAN
DR
B ST
TRACK 13 RD
OLDS RD
32ND AVE
YUCCA ST
DEL NORTE BLVD
PATTERSON RD
CHANNEL ISLANDS BLVD
VICTORIA AVE
ELM ST
PERKINS RD
ETTING RD
F ST
PACIFIC AVE
5TH PL
PALMA DR
6TH ST
SANTA CLARA AVE
N ST
ENTRADA DR
CLARA ST
D ST
WALKER ST
ALLEY
WALNUT DR
BALBOA ST
DUNKIRK DR
SIMON WAY
ORANGE DR
STROUBE ST
5TH ST
EMERSON AVE
JOLIET PL
EBONY DR
KENTIA ST
HILL ST
I ST
SAN JUAN AVE
PATRICIA ST A ST
VENTURA BLVD
EASTMAN AVE
TRACK 14 RD
GISLER AVE
FIR AVE
M ST
TERESA ST
PENINSULA RD
OFFSHORE ST
AZALEA ST
VICTORIA AV
11TH AVE
WILLIAMS DR
HARBOR SERVICE
BLVD
DONLON
ST
APPLE LN
LEI DR
STATHAM BLVD
OLIVE ST
LATIGO AVE
ARCTURUS AVE
K ST
BUTLER RD
ALBION DR
SURFSIDE DR
SWAN ST
NINA DR GARY DR
STURGIS RD
MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE
E ST
SAN MATEO PL
LAMBERT ST
SIKORSKY ST
JANETWOOD DR
ASH ST
META ST
DOCK 1
JOAN WAY
BEAUMONT AVE
PAVIN DR
NELSON PL
OXFORD DR
HOLLY AVE
VENICE RD WESTAR DR
MANDALAY
BEACH
RD
AVILA PL
BLANCA PL
VIEWPOINT DR
CAMINO AVE
BAYVIEW DR
ELBA
ST
SCOTT ST R CI E AVE
VICTORIA AVE
B ST
G ST
M ST
ALLEY
GONZALES RD
ALLEY
101 FRWY
F ST
OCEAN DR
CHANNEL ISLANDS BLVD
C ST
ALLEY
PATTERSON RD
ETTING RD
HARBOR
BLVD
ALLEY
Vicinity Map
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles
North
Pacific Ocean
N
November 5, 2018
Oxnard Planning
1:70,000
Santa Clara River
PZ 18-500-02
APN: 2310092245, 2310092105
Vicinity Map
PZ 18-500-02
21 RP
ILT
ICD
RL
CG
SCH
PRK
RM
RLM
ESM
RMH
CLARA ST
P
E
R
KIN
S
R
D
HUENEME RD
S
AVIE
R
S
R
D
C
O
U
R
TLA
N
D
S
T
D
U
N
B
A
R
D
R
ALLEY
CUESTA DEL MAR DR C
O
N
N
E
R
D
R
FAIRBOURNE PL
B
A
R
R
Y
M
O
R
E
D
R
R
OLA
N
D
WAY
IRWIN WAY
CLARK CT
MAGELLAN AVE
C
OLU
M
B
U
S
PL
C
H
A
RLE
S
S
T
CARLISLE CT
ALLE
Y
ALLEY
ALLE
Y
ALLEY
2030 General Plan Land Use Map
0 125 250 500
Feet
2030 General Plan Land Use Map
November 7, 2018 1:5,000
Oxnard Planning
PZ 18-500-02
APN: 2310092245, 2310092105
ILT
22 CDI
M1PD
M2PD
R2
R3
R4
R1PD
C2
C2AH
CPDAH
M2
P
E
R
KIN
S
R
D
HUENEME RD
S
AVIE
R
S
R
D
CUESTA DEL MAR DR
D
U
N
B
A
R
D
R
C
O
N
N
E
R
D
R
IRWIN WAY
C
O
U
R
T
L
A
N
D
S
T
B
A
R
RY
M
O
R
E
D
R
MCWANE BLVD
MAGELLAN AVE
CARLISLE CT
MCWANE BLVD
Zoning/Specific Plan Map
0 100 200 400 600 800
Feet
Zoning/Specific Plan Map
November 6, 2018 1:5,000
Oxnard Planning
PZ 18-500-02
APN: 2310092245, 2310092105
23 P
E
R
KIN
S
R
D
W HUENEME RD
W CLARA ST
S
AVIE
R
S
R
D
D
U
N
B
A
R
D
R
C
O
U
R
T
L
A
N
D
S
T
CUESTA DEL MAR DR
E CLARA ST
C
O
N
N
E
R
D
R
B
A
R
RY
M
O
R
E
D
R
IRWIN WAY
E HUENEME RD
R
O
L
A
N
D
WAY
CLARK CT
MAGELLAN AVE
CARLISLE CT
Aerial Map
Aerial Map
November 7, 2018
Oxnard Planning
0 125 250 500 750 1,000
Feet
PZ 18-500-02
APN: 2310092245, 2310092105
24 Attachment:
B. Reduced Project Plans
25 x
26 31033LS 31033LS
2633LS
3068 31033LS 3068
31033LS
3068
8'-0" 19'-1 1/2"
28'-0"
8'-0"8'-0"
28'-0"
20'-5 1/4" 3'-0" 4'-6 3/4"
Windows: Aluminum
All DOOR LOCATIONS, WINDOW
LOCATIONS, & MEASUREMENTS
ARE APPROXIMATE.
THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE
PROPRIETARY WORK PRODUCT
AND PROPERTY OF ATLAS
PERFORMANCE INDUSTRIES, INC.,
DEVELOPED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE
USE OF ATLAS PERFORMANCE
INDUSTRIES, INC. USE OF THESE
DRAWINGS AND CONCEPTS
CONTAINED THEREIN WITHOUT
THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF
ATLAS PERFORMANCE
INDUSTRIES, INC. IS PROHIBITED
AND MAY SUBJECT YOU TO A
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM
ATLAS PERFORMANCE
INDUSTRIES, INC.
Electrical: 100-125 amp sub-panel, single phase, 110-220volt Atlas Performance Industries, Inc. Phone: 800 394-9217 e-mail: [email protected] www.apitrailers.com HVAC: Bard wall mount 2ea@1ton ea
Code: Commercial Modular Department of Housing
Notes
Attachment:
Body Paint: Sherwin Williams Gloss Latex, Color: Taupe
Trim Paint: Sherwin Williams Gloss Latex, Color: White
Web Site: www.apitrailers.com
Phone: 800 394-9217
Modular Building size: 8x28 Floor Cover: Charcoal Carpet Interior wall Finish: Minnesota Birch
Ceiling: T-Bar 2x4 suspended
Scale: 3/16"=1' @ 11x17
Last Revision Date: 11/13/2014
e-mail: [email protected]
Fax: 805 928-9190
Roofing: EPDM
Siding: Smart Panel
Exterior Doors: 3'-0" x 6'-8" Metal
Base Cove: 4" Vinyl Charcoal Gray
Lighting: 2x4 Recessed Fluorescent
API Inv#:082000021
A
PI In
v#:0
8 2
0 0
0 0
2 1
27 Vehicle Storage at Hueneme & Perkins
Temporary Office Trailer Photos
28 (951)
TMP SERVICES
2929 KANSAS
R!VERS�DE, CA
213-3900 FAX
AVE @
92507
(951) 213-3997
ACCESS�BLE RAM PS/LAN DINGS /ST Al RS
PROPRIETARY DESIGN: THIS DRAWING AND THE MATERIAL CONTAINED THEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF TMP SERVICES, INC. AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED. COPIED OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY
OR INDIRECTLY AND SHALL NOT BE USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO
ASSIST IN THE MAKING OF OR THE PURPOSE OF FURNISHING ANY
INFORMATION FOR THE MAKING OF' DRAWINGS, PRINTS, APPARATUS OR
PARTS THEREOF WITHOUT THE FULL KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT OF TMP SERVICES, INC. ALL PATENTABLE MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN AND ORIGINATED WITH TMP SERVICES. INC. SHALL BE THE PROPERTY OF TMP SERVICES, INC.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC.
4091 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, SUITE 114 CHINO, CALIFORNIA 91710 MEMBER
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA
AMERICAN CONCRffi
INST/TllfE
(909) 61'-0234
F,a)((909) 613-0238
NOTES:
LOADS:
1. RAMP LIVE LOAD = 1 00 PSF
2. NO SNOW LOADING
3. NO FLOOD LOADING
4. 5.
WIND:
WIND SPEED = 120 MPH
RISK CATEGORY = II
EXPOSURE = C
KzT = 1.0
WIND DESIGN PER ASCE 7-10 CHAPTER 29
SEISMIC:
RISK CATEGORY = II
I e = 1.0
Ss = 3.73
S 1 = 1.30
SITE CLASS = D
S DS = 2.487
Cs = 0.9332 (ASCE 7-10 EQUATION 15.4-2)
R = 3.25 (ASCE 7-10 TABLE 15.4-1)
6. ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING - 1000 PSF
CODES:
2016 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (CAC) .... (PART 1, TITLE 24, CCR) 2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC), VOLUMES 1 AND 2 (PART 2, TITLE 24, CCR) (2015 EDITION INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE WITH 2016 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS)
2016 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE (CFC), (PART 9, TITLE 24, CCR) (2015 EDITION INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE WITH 2016 CALIFORNIA
AMENDMENTS)
2016 CALIFORNIA GREEN CODE (CFC), (PART 9, TITLE 24, CCR) 2016 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED CODE, (PART 12, TITLE 24, CCR) NFPA 13 2016
NFPA 72 2016
2016 CODE SECTIONS FOR APPLICABLE STANDARDS
2016 CBC, CHAPTER 35
2016 CFC, CHAPTER 45
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Sheet No Description Dated
1 COVER SHEET 01 FEB. 2017
2 ACCESSIBLE RAMP ELEVATIONS & DETAILS 01 FEB. 2017
3 ACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAILS & NOTES 01 FEB. 2017
4 DETAILS & NOTES 01 FEB. 2017
5 ACCESSIBLE RAMP SWITCH BACK DETAILS 01 FEB. 2017
6 STAIRS - OPTIONAL 01 FEB. 2017
7 ACCESSIBLE RAMP OPTIONAL ALUMINUM DECK 01 FEB. 2017
8 ACCESSIBLE RAMP ELEVATIONS & PLAN VIEWS 01 FEB. 2017
ALTERNATE PLANK RAMP /LANDINGS
Sheet No Description Dated
1A COVER SHEET 01 FEB. 2017
2A ACCESSIBLE RAMP ELEVATIONS & DETAILS 01 FEB. 2017
3A ACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAILS & NOTES 01 FEB. 2017
4A DETAILS & NOTES 01 FEB. 2017
5A ACCESSIBLE RAMP SWITCH BACK DETAILS 01 FEB. 2017
6A STAIRS - OPTIONAL 01 FEB. 2017
7A ACCESSIBLE RAMP OPTIONAL ALUMINUM DECI 01 FEB. 2017
8A ACCESSIBLE RAMP ELEVATIONS & PLAN VIEWS 01 FEB. 2017 Revised
Revised
REVISIONS BY
...
1-
w
w
I
(/)
cc::
w
>
0 u
I 0
w
I==
�
(/)
01 .._ OF
DATE SIGNED
,, '".
-.; u
<(
-
O:'.
0 -
.J
<(
LL
0 w
I-
<(
I-
(/)
DRAWN
CHECKED
DATE
FEB. 2017 SCALE
JOB NO.
1 8 SHEETS
�
29 TYPICAL RAMP & DECK SECTIONS TYPICAL 72" SECTION 1--------.;.:;_;:;_c::_;:_::::.:.;_:c;__ _______ -+ 1 1/2"X1 1/2"X 0.065" FLOOR JOIST-t-_1,,2~"-+---'1_,,2_" -+---1,_.2a..,"_+ _ _,_12._"_+ _ _J1.!,2_" _,.___1,_,2'---"-+ 1 1/2"XI l/2"X 0.065" EDGE &
PERIMETER BEAMS TYPICAL
@ EA. ( 4) SIDE.
12 GA. STEEL DECKING WELDED--+L--~1c-1e--- TO PERIMETER FRAME & FLOOR I I JOIST "L" SHAPED CHANNEL CONNECTING/
LOCKING SECTION IN PLACE
PER DTL E/-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
-n---
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I 2"X 0.065 LOOR
O.C. TUBE TEEL
1 1/2"XI 1/2"X 0.065" FLOOR
JOIST @ 12" O.C.
1 1/2"X1 1/2"X 0.065" EDGE
PERIMETER BEAMS (4 SIDES)
• "'
. z ., ,. -
__ -:;;i,,,--i- PLATES WELDED TO TUBES @ 12" O.C.
BOTH SIDES STAGGERED
z
0 §
"' • ., • ... -
"' ...,
11 3/4" LONG
12 GA. STEEL DECKING
WELDED TO PERIMETER
FRAME & FLOOR JOIST
' z ., ,. "L" SHAPED CHANNEi '>---_t":.'::.-:'_":_1J
• "' _i___Jl±=~;zf_=~=~±===========l±==::::uiLJ
CONNECTING/LOCKING
SECTIONS IN PLACE
PER PTL E/-
• "'
POSEBLEEVE @ MID SPANS ~-~-< TYPICAL @ JOIST f-'.
SEE 3 I 1/8" & PERIMErERS
4 I - I
60" MIN. LANDING SECTION
12" 100" MAX. LANDING SECTION
r--, ---,T---, I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I 6
I !-'---11+-J-kil;!d
I I 4
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I ALS
01ST
---~l-~-~~--~~--~+---~---W~~+
'-
4 4
CONT. 1 1 /2'X1 1 /2" X 0.065" t T.S. @ 5' -o· WIDE LANDING •
TYPICAL
___________ 6'-0" RAMP SECTION PLAN VIEW r7:'\A TYPICAL 7'-0" X 5'-0" LANDING SCALE: 3/4" - 1'-0" V ----~=----=-~...:...__...,@) TYPICAL 1 1/2"X1 1/2"X 0.065" T.S. 12 GA. STEEL DECKING I CORNER SLEEVES FLUSH W/DECKING I VERTICAL @ MIDSPAN :
I FOR 50#/FT HANDRAI 3 I ITT LOADING SEE DTL >-------l n 4 4 -1+....._ / :ab 8" CHANNEL
SECTION LOCKS
PER DETAIL "E"
11 11
lJ
1/B" 11
11 J,l
1 l/2"XI l/2"X 0.065" T.S.
FRAMING & JOIST
I - \
"n11
lJ
I 1 /2"X1 I /2" ANGLE
1/8" 1"@ 10" O.C. MAX.
#10 X 3/4" ST SMS -----,4-'--<7 @ 12" O.C. MAX.
ANGLE TO TUBE
1/ 1/
:,- I // 1/1/ ol // 1/ I // ,, // , I//
// 12 GA. PLATE // SLOPE @ 1:12 MAX.
//.
/,
//
18"
MATCH SLOPE OF RAMP.
NOTE:
AS MANY RAMP OR
LANDING SECTIONS
CAN BE ADDED AS
NECESSARY TO MEET
SITE REQUIREMENTS
48' CLEAR @ 51" WIDE TYPICAL SECTON 57" CLEAR @ 60" WIDE
LANDING
HANDRAIL
30' -0" MAXIMUM LENTH OF TYPICAL RAMP
MAX. RAMP SLOPE 1 : 12
JOISTS TO BUTT INTO CONT. MEMBER
EXTENSION "":!'12~'~Ml~N.;----'6e.' -=Oe."--+---'6'-=' -::,0!..."----l,---__!!6'.::-:.sD_" ---+ --.30" MAX.
BUILDING
7 4 $
,/
\
'
'-
@ 5' -O' WIDE 72" BOTTOM TYPICAL RAMP SECTION MANUFACTURED IN 72" SECTONS 7'-0" MIN. LANDING -+---;lA-;±;NOs;IN.f,G~Si#IT"E'---+---------'-"-"""'-'='---'""'°'-""'-"'="'-"'"'-""="'-""'--'-''-''-""'-""""---------+--!....::.:"---='-------+ INSTALLED BY OTHERS NOTE: MAXIMUM LENGTH OF EACH SECTON OF RAMPS ARE 30' -0" LANDING
TYPICAL PLAN VIEW OF ACCESSIBLE RAMP & DECK
SCALE: 1/4" - l'-0"
NOTE:
AS MANY RAMP OR
LANDING SECTIONS
CAN BE ADDED AS
NECESSARY TO MEET SITE REQUIREMENTS
OPTIONAL TOE PLAT
HANDRAIL
EXTENSION
12" MIN.
30" MAX.
SEE EB
SEE DETAIL 11/4 FOR ALTERNATE
TOE @ END OF RAMP
12" MIN. TYPICAL
12"
1"
WHEEL GUIDE
PER DTLf-----l PAST TOE OF I 1/4"XI I 4"X 0.065" RAMP LEVEL JACK POST TYPICAL WITH LANDING SECTIONS STD. 6' -o" 6' -o· 6'-0" 'TYPICAL I 1/2"X1 1/2"X 0.065" RAIL POST @ 3'-0" O.C.
OPTIONAL 6" LANDING~ &: SECTION AS
REQUIRED
s'-o"
I L'S
1 LAYOUT
7'-0"
BUILDING
24" I>=-="\ I EXTERIO ,
I CLEAR '-
I '~--11.-
• 0
I
"" z
,. I r----t,·----&-+----,fl---.-b I
.,,, • 0 'S "' " " z b 0 "' z
:l
"-
0 "' w ;!;
" 0 ~5
0 <D f'-
'-
b
I
""
OPTIONAL LANDING
SCALE: 1/4" - 1'-0"
----lYPlCAL ANGLE BRACING
1 1/4" X 1 1/4" X 1/8"
WHEN LANDINGS & RAMPS EB EXCEED 24" 1N HEIGHT SEE 3
NOTE: LANDING NOT TO EXCEED 30" ABOVE
FlNISHED GRADE
PROVIDE SUPPORTS FOR
1 1/2 X 1 1/2 X 0.065" EDGE BEAMS @ 3'-0" O.C. MAX.
TYP. POST
SIDE ENO VIEW OF LEVEL
SCALE: 3/4" - 1'-0"
DECK SECTION OPTIONAL TOE PLATE ® -------------JH rf'-.---'I. OF JACK POST & WOOD SILL TYPICAL ELEVATION OF ACCESSIBLE RAMP & DECKING 30" OR LESS SCALE: 1/4" - 1'-0"
TYPICAL 1 1/2"X1 1/2"X 10" X 0.065" T.S. -_;.-~
12 GA. STEEL DECKING W/SLIP RESISTANT FINISH
\ VERTICAL @ MIDSPAN
I 1 /2" OUTER TUBE SLEEVE
1 1/4" INNER TUBE POST
CORNER SLEEVES@ LOWER END OF I RAMP SECTIONS SEE DTLEB
8" CHANNEL
SECTION LOCKS
PER E/2
I _o
I
-u-/ 3 u /B1/8" II
4 1 1/2"X1 1/2''X 0.065" PERIMETER
T.S. FRAMING & JOIST
11 11
11 11
.IJ
OF PREVIOUS RAMP SECTION
1 1/2"X1 1/2"X 0.065" T.S.
@ HIGH END OF RAMP SECTIONS
--------~~--c SIDE VIEW OF SLOPING RAMP SECTION TYPICAL © SCALE: 3/4" - 1'-0" • 0
LAST MEMBER NOT
SHOWN FOR CLARITY
TOE SECTON
LENGTH VARIES TO SITE CONDITIONS -~
___________ TOE SECTION ___} ® 0 SCALE: 3/4" - 1'-0"
3/4
1"
l b8" l
TU.BE OF ADJACENT
RAMP OR LANDING SECTION
1 ..
1/2" 1/2"
170 L_J
1 7 8"
1 1/2"
"U" PLATE X 0.105" --0 WELDED OPTION -------------JCD X b
8"
I "
TUBE Of ADJACENT
RAMP OR LANDING
SECTION
I"
BENT 0.105" PLATE ------~
1/2"1 1/2"
J 1/2"
3"
SMS OPTION W/9-#10SMSTOTAL -------------"0
8" CHANNEL SECTION (c\ --------------<~
2-10d X I 1/2"
GALV. BOX NAILS BASE PlATE TO
WOOD SILL
JACKPOST & BASE
PLATE PER DTL.
EB
2 X 8 X 14" LONG SILL P.T.H.F. OR EQUAL
ALTERNATE 2 X 6 X 18" LONG SILL P.T.H.F. OR EQUAL @ 5' -0" MAX WIDE RAMP OR LANDING USE 2XBX17" OR 2 X 6 X 22" PLATE @ 5' -3" MAX WIDE LANDING
FlN.
GRADE
NOTE:
NO CONNECTION OF 2X SILL
TO GRADE REQUIRED, LATERAL
FORCES RESISTED BY
CONNECTION OF LANDING TO
BUILDING
--------J ALTERNATE WOOD SILLS 0 @ JACK POST TO GRADE
WHERE CONCRETE OR
AC PAVING DOES NOT
OCCUR
NOTE:
AS MANY RAMP OR
LANDING SECTIONS CAN BE ADDED AS
NECESSARY TO MEET SITE REQUIREMENTS
HANDRAIL
EXTENSION
72" BOTTOM
12" MIN.
HAN RAIL 30" MAX.
12" MIN.
30" MAX.
LANDING SITE INSTALLED BY OTHERS
6'-0" 6'-0"
OPTION 1 THRESHOLD FLASHING TO FILL GAP - ATTACH WITH TUBE W/(4) #10 X 1 1/2" SCREWS 1"~ SEE 9 TYP.
. "--t - o.065" v
TYPICAL ANGLE BRACING 1 1/4" X 1 1/4" X 1/B" SEE
MAX. RAMP SLOPE 1 12
6'-0"
TYPICAL RAMP SECTION MANUFACTURED IN 72" SECTIONS
NOTE: MAXIMUM LENGTH OF EACH SECTION OF RAMPS ARE 30' -0" 12" MIN • HANDRAIL
72"
LANDING
b
I
""
b
I
.,,,
TYPICAL PLAN VIEW OF ACCESSIBLE RAMP & DECK LAYOUT OVER 30" DESIGN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" /4
BUILDING
DOOR IN ANY POSITION TO CENTER OF RAMP /LANDING CONNECTION OPTIONAL 5' -0" X 7' -6" LANDING
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
rf'-.---<t OF JACK - SEE DETt,L 11/4 FOR ALTERNATE OPTIONAL 6"~ POST LANDING SECTION 4'~X. CENTE~ TOE@ END OF RAMP AS REQUIRED A TO CENTER
JACK POST TO BEAR
ON PAVING WITH NO
CONN_ECTIONS. lATERAL
FORCES RESISTED BY
CONNECTION OF LANDING
TO BUILDING, CONNECTION
TO GRADE NOT REQUIRED.
JACKPOST & BASE
PLATE PER DTL
' EB /EXISTNG ASPHALT OR CONRETE PAVING
ALTERNATE: PLACE JACK POST
~>
& BASE PLATE ON CONC. PAD
(CONC. PAD BY OTHERS)
;li
I;;=,
SEE EB 4" MAX. CENTER ..., 12" MIN. TO CENTER 30" MAX.
"' "' :3
" @ ...,
;:; a: • 0
I= .-z ~I .,. "' "' • :c• " @ "' • OPTIONAL TOE PLATE / H r/,, TYPICAL SECTI07 PER DTL STD. ~" 12" MIN. PAST TOE OF RAMP, 18·~ e' o"
__ JA_C_K_P_O_S_T_TO_P_A_V_I N_G __ ---i@ LEVEL TY PDINCAL SCALE: 1/4" - 1'-0"
MAX.
ELEVATION
TYPICAL #10 Sj:LF TAPPING SCREWS '[§ 12 O.C.
I 1/2''X1 1/2" MIN. X 0.065"
1 I /2"X4" LLH MAX. 0.065" ANGLE OPTIONAL FILLER
~2 1/2" MAX
I I TYPICAL THRESHOLD, BY OTHERS
I I
FLOOR, BY OTHERS
1/2" MAX.,--.._,-+---+'IIH- ~-L..-
======::l'!eza~ CD '-----"--DECK FRAME
=~-------------
----------~~ FILLER DETAIL (c\
OF
/3\TYP. \._: 1 WHEEL GUIDE
z
,.
•
Qllll, N
"':.. I.---
I ', /~
" l.---'".
;!
TYPICAL ANGLE BRACING @ 1 1/4" X 1 1/4" X 1/8" SEE V PROVIDE SUPPORTS FOR 1 1/2 X I 1/2 X 0.065" EDGE BEAMS @ 3' -0" O.C. lYPlCAL I 1 lYPICAL 1:,-.
I
. TYPICAL 3'-0" 3' O" I 3' O" 3' o· I
' 6' O" s'-o" 6' O" 6' o"
ACCESSIBLE RAMP & DECKING
NOTE: PROVIDE INTERMEDIATE LANDINGS AND SWITCH BACK
OR MULTIPLE RAMP SECTIONS AS REQUIRED WHERE
ELEVATION DIFFERENCE AT RAMP EXCEEDS 30" MAX.
RISE, SEE SHEET 5 FOR OPTIONAL RAMP/LANDING
LAYOUTS.
., :c
b
"' • f! g ;=
"'
3'-0"
'~TYP. POST
PROPRIETARY DESIGN: THIS DRAWING AND THE MATERIAL CONTAINED THEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF TMP SERVICES, INC. AND SHALL
NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY
OR INDIRECTLY AND SHALL NOT BE USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO
ASSIST IN THE MAKING OF OR THE PURPOSE OF FURNISHING ANY
INFORMATION FOR THE MAKING OF DRAWINGS, PRINTS, APPARATIJS OR
PARTS THEREOF WITHOUT THE FULL KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT OF TMP SERVICES, INC. ALL PATENTABLE MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN AND ORIGINATED WITH TMP SERVICES, INC. SHALL BE THE PROPERTY OF TMP SERVICES, INC.
I§>)@ I
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC.
4091 RIVERSIOE DRIVE, SUITE 114 CHINO, CALIFORNIA 91710 MEMBER
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNJA
AMERICAN CONCRETE
INSTITUTE
(909) 613-0234
Fax(909) 613-0236
"' REVISIONS BY
....
DATE SIGNED
(/)
z
0 -
f--
<(
> (/) 0 .J r-- 0 r-- w w .o
w LO en en
u >NI"'> en
0. - <en1"1
> "1 I
1 (/) - "1 0::: <<N- <( w (I) U ,.......N
It z - ........ (/) <( .,. LO,..... :,,: w en LO
w c, .__,en - .__, en (/) .. .J (/) 0.... N et:: La.I • • (D .J enwZx
-- N>O< (/) <( - :I: u.. t- 0:: c.. (/) f-- wW
(JO
<(
-
z
O:'.
0 u..
-
.J
<(
0 u..
0 I 8
w w
f- f-
<( - f- (/) V)
DRAWN "'
CHECKED
DATE
01 FEB. 2017 SCALE
JOB NO.
2 OF 8 SHEETS
MAX CROSS SLOPE 1:48
MAX CROSS SLOPE 1:48
30 .
.
-
48"
NOTE: so· WHEN OCCUPANT LOAD 300 OR MORE
NOTE: TYPICAL DECKING -, 12 GA. STEEL NON-SUP
FINISH
I
1 1/4" TO 1 1/2"
MAX., TYP.
HANDRAIL~~
,1 1/2"
1 1;2·
-
-
~1 1/2"X1 1/2"X 16 GA.
TOPS OF GUARD, TYP.
1/2" X 1/2" INTERMEDIATE
NOT TO EXCEED 4"
CENTERLINE TO CENTERLINE
ALTERNATE 1/2"• INTERMEDIATE NOT TO
EXCEED 4" CENTERLINE TO CENTERLINE
1 ,.-------1 1/2''X1 1/2" X 0.065"
'.'"" T.S, @ BOTTOM OF GUARD (CURB)
........ - ...... /
-.._-.._ .___ .___ NOTE: ANGLE BRACES REQUIRED TWO WAYS----- ,-",," 1 1/2''X1 1/2" X 0.065" -......_ -....._ @ TWO CORNERS OF TYP. 4 X 6 ----....._.......- ,........,,- T.S,@ DECK FRAMING '- - '- ......_ RAMP & LANDING SECTIONS FOR - - .,.,.. .,..... '....._-..... ......_ RAMP &: LANDINGS GREATER THAN - _.,, - - --..........._ -"-......_ 2'-0" ABOVE GRADE ___ .,..... .,,,... - ........ -....... ........ --/ - ........ ....... -........ -- -....... -...... / - ........ _ ........ , ,.,,.-,.,,.,,,,.. ......_ ........ / - ---- >< / _><x;:<-...... - / - ......_ / ..,,.. ....... - -.,.,.. -- ---......_ / - ................ / - - ....... / -,/ _..,. -................ - _,,... ----~- _,...,,... 1 (MAX) ----'-..... -..........._
--.,,.,. _,,..... -' -- - - - - ---- ----
• _ -----1 1/2''X1 1/2" X 0.065"
--- T.S. DECK SLEEVES
----1 1/4"X1 1/4" X 0.065"
_. T.S. JACK POST
- -:::.-~ 1 ........ - - - -
~,,,..,. .,.,.. _,..., - TYPICAL ANGLE BRACES 1 1/4" X 1 1/4" X 1/8" ....... - -......_' /; / /
3" X 3" X 10 GA. le. TYP.
@ JACK POST BOTTOMS /) ------------1-'--.---'='---- L 1 1/2" MIN. 12" MAX., TYP.
@SCALE:
TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS +30"
1/8" MIN. RADIUS, TYP.
0 48"
NOTE: 60" WHEN OCCUPANT LOAD 300 OR MORE
NOTE: TYPICAL DECKING --~
12 GA. STEEL NON-SLIP
FINISH
-
-
0 0
1 1/2"
1 1/2"X1 1/2"X 0.065"
TOPS OF GUARD, TYP.
1 1/2''X1 1/2" X 0.065"
T.S. @ BOTTOM OF
GUARO (CURB)
1 1/2''X1 1/2" X 0.065"
_LJ,-~~---T.S. @ DECK FRAMING
o~- .-o ..... t- - NOTE: ANGLE BRACES REQUIRED TWO WAYS _ - - ::: _. ;;. --:.:-- @ TWO CORNERS OF TYP. 4 X 6 -- --
- - :: - - RAMP & LANDING SECTIONS FOR - ::: ::: - -
- - ::-- RAMP & LANDINGS GREATER THAN - - :: :: -
- - :: :::-- 2' -0" ABOVE GRADE - - ::: - -
---- ---- --:::::::-- ----==-- --->< --- _>><<-
---- ---- ---- ---- ---;<- :;....::--_
0 1 1/2"X1 1/2" X 0.065"
T.S. DECK SLEEVES
,.....---1 1/4''X1 1/4" X 0.065"
_,- T.S. JACK POST
------T- ""--._ TYPICAL ANGLE------------ - - - : : - - --:--- l (MAX) BRACES 1 1/4"X1 1/4"X 1/8" --:---. / 3" X 3" X 10 GA. I!. TYP. - - - - :-- - @ JACK POST BOTTOMS I- ---- - - o::-- 1 ----
lJ.
TYPICAL CROSS 1" = 1•-on
SECTIONS -30"
,4> -
L 1, 1/2" MIN.
12" MAX .. TYP.
-
-- -----
12" MIN, E~. v(l) 3/8" • BOLT
@ HANDRAILS
LEVEL WITH / LANDING r g \
0 V
/ c--
l---,11-1---------
f---' ,--- I
_,
~x ----(1 3/8 \& BOLT IL--TI_,-.- @ EA. F OST '- , - ' L-- AL ERNI E j...-1,1,-+lj,l-----rr- USE #1 SMS
IN LIEU OF 1-3/8"•
BOLT OR 2-#12 SMS USE
14 GA. X 2 1/2" X 2 1/2"
PLATE W/2 #12 SMS
EA. END
8" CHANNEL SECTION
TO SUPPORT ADJACENT
RAMP
• • • +
I
• --H a: . /:
'7 )
1-,1,.;1-----3/8" BOLT @ EA. SLEEVE
I TO JACK POST
,_ I ALTERNATE
I USE 2 - #12 SMS
I SEE DETAILS
I 3, 4, & 6/SHEET 4
I
, ! TYPICAL ANGLE BRACES
L--"~ 1 1/4" X 1 1/4" X 1/8"
I
I
I
I v#10 I SELF TAPPING SCREWS
/ 5 \TYP. I" EA. ENO OF BRACES, TYP.
f---l
SECTION +30"
• g
r 1 1/2"X1 1/2"X 0.065" I ro~~--~-
b:======-==-==-==-=r-r1 ,~=-=-=--=--,=i---r 1-
w~-~-----(1) 3/8"•BPLT
3/8" O M. BOLTo
@ EACH POST
ALTERNATE USE
#12 SMS
- -
' ... ;:
--
.
..
\
1 1/2"X1 1/2"X 0.065" T.S. TOP/1/2" X 1/2" INTERMEDIATES @ 4" O.C. OF GUARO TYP. ALTERNATE 1/2"• INTERMEDIATES ' @ 4" o.c. / 1 1/2"X1 1/2"X 0.065" SLEEVE
/ MIDSPAN
/
I
r
'
..... I
L 1 1 /2" X 1 1 /2" X 0.065" BOTTOM
•• CURB OF GUARD ,.,,
1 1/2" X 1 1/2" X 0.065"
T.S. END POST (42")
JACKPOST
LANDING RAIL 1" = 1'-0"
1~
1 (MAX)
LAYOUT +30"
r 1 1/2"X1 1/2''X 0.065"
/ TOPS OF GUARD, TYP.
,
1 1/2''X1 1/2''X 0.065" SLEEVE
MIDSPAN
IEND POST (42")
-
-
- 1 1 /2"X1 1/2"X 0.065" T.S. TOPS
OF GUARD, TYP.
, ~, --------1 1/2" X 1 1/2" X 0.065"
T.S. END POST (42")
~JACKPOST
,
,
1/2" X 1/2" INTERMEDIATES @ 4" O.C.
ALTERNATE 1/2"• INTERMEDIATES @ 4" o.c.
I
1 1 /2"X1 1/2"X 0.065" SLEEVE
MIDSPAN
-
A / """"'" 1 1/2" X 1 1/2" X 0.065" BOTTOM
CURB OF GUARD 1-
1~
1 (MAX)
LAYOUT +30"
1 1/2"X1 1/2"X 0.065"
TOPS OF GUARD, TYP.
'
1 1/2''X1 1/2"X 0.065" SLEEVE
MIDSPAN
/
1 1/2"X1 /2" X 0.065"
T.S. @ BO rroM OF
GUARO (CURB)
~- b::::============7 i=:===~t--t-,bY
/
1 1/2"X1 1/2" X 0.065"
T.S. @ BOTTOM OF
GUARD (CURB)
t:::'"-,---~~--------------1 -
.. :.. .. _7 ..
TO SUPPORT ADJACENT
/5\TYP.
1 1 /2"X1 1 /2" X 0.065"
T.S. @ DECK FRAMING
3/8" BOLT @ EA. SLEEVE
TO JACK POST ALTERNATE
USE 2 - #12 SMS
SEE DETAILS
3, 4, & 6/SHEET 4
~·
A
SECTION -30"
/.
.,- 1 1 /2" X 1 1 /2" TUBE
I VERTS
1'
I
JACK POST
WHERE OCCURS
14 GA. 2 1/2" X 2 1/2" IP. W/4 #12 SMS
- BOTTOM RAIL CONNECTION DX NO SCALE
-
I
.. . ,.,
RAIL LAYOUT -30"
.. .
.,..
/_
1 1/2"X1 1/2" X 0.065"
T.S. @ BOTTOM OF
GUARD (CURB)
I-
... ,
1~
1 (MAX)
®S~LE:
RAMP RAILING LAYOUT -30" 1" = 1'-0"
PROPRIETARY DESIGN: THIS DRAWING AND THE MATERIAL CONTAINED THEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF TMP SERVICES, INC. AND SHALL
NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY
OR INDIRECTLY ANO SHALL NOT BE USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO
ASSIST IN THE MAKING OF OR THE PURPOSE OF FURNISHING ANY
INFORMATION FOR THE MAKING OF DRAWINGS, PRINTS, APPARATUS OR
PARTS THEREOF WITHOUT THE FULL KNOWLEDGE ANO CONSENT OF TMP SERVICES, INC. ALL PATENTABLE MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN ANO ORIGINATED WITH TMP SERVICES, INC. SHALL BE THE PROPERTY OF TMP SERVICES, INC.
I§>~ I
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC.
4091 RNERSIDE DRIVE. SUITE 114 CHINO, CALIFORNIA 91710
-
. ..
MEMBER
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA
AMERICAN CONCRETE
INSTITUTE
(909) 613-0234
Fax(909) 613-0238
REVISIONS BY
0.. (/)
2W
<( I- rr O
z
w
_J
rn
-
(/) (/)
(/) _J
w <(
u 1-
u w <( 0
..
w
f=
-
U)
DATE SIGNED
(/)
w
u
>
0::::
w
(/)
Q_
fORAWN
CHECKED
DATE
<(
z
Q'.
0 LL
_J
<(
0 LL
0 w
r
<(
r
(/)
01 FEB. 2017 SCALE
JOB NO.
3 OF 8 SHEETS
'
31 NOTE: HANDRAILS, THE GRIP PORTION SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1 1/4 INCHES NOR MORE THAN 1 1/2 INCHES, OR THE SHAPE SHALL PROVIDE AN
EQUIVALENT GRIPPING SURFACE AND ALL SURFACES SHALL BE SMOOTH WITH NO SHARP CORNERS. HANDRAILS SHALL NOT ROTATE WITHIN
GRIND EDGES
THEIR FITTINGS. ANY WALL OR OTHER SURFACE ADJACENT TO THE
HANDRAIL SHALL BE FREE OF SHARP OR ASBRASIVE ELEMENTS, EDGES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM RADIUS OF 1/8 INCH.
1 1 2" CLEAR
SMOOTH, 1 /8" RADIUS -- 1 3 4" r ,
\
\
I
I
ROUND TOP
CONNECTIONS CAN
BE WELDED
\. _:;t;;;.:::;tG-~:=-=--
- 7/16" DIA. HOLE
1/8" MIN,
RADIUS, lYP.
HANDRAIL BRACKETS-ROUND TOP
f-e--WALL
WAGNER BRACKET H-8-2 J j 3" DIA. TYPE 2-H W/2-1/4" ¢ 1/4" META
HOLES I I
SEE DETAIL 9/- FOR CONNECTION TO VERTICAL POST
G)OPTIONAL HANDRAIL ARMS
!:]
:,:
5 z
.,
0 z
:i,
• "'
1/B"
• .,
....
' ..
1/4"X1 1/4" X D.065"
TUBE STEEL JACKPOST
3" X 3" X 10 GA.
POST BASE
•
112"CLR
HANDRAIL
1/8
TUBE STEEL
VERTICAL
3/4"•PIPE
EXTENSION
TYPICAL HANDRAIL ARMS
#12 ST SMS EA. SIDE OF
SLEEVE TO JACK POST
(2 SMS TOTAL)
------~AL~T~ER~N~A~TE=--.,C~O~N~NE~C~T~IO~N'-----4 6X JACK POST TO SLEEVE 1 1/2"
ti1
DECKING/RAMP
~-1 1/2"X1 1/2"X 0.065"
SLEEVE ,,,
I I 3/8" M.8. TYP. THROUGH 1 1 /2" T.S.
SLEEVE II 1 1/4" JACK POST
7 /16"• BOLT HOL 1 1/4"X1 1/4" X 0.065" JACK POST
• "'
.... I
0 j 7 /8" l 1/4" l 7/8" l t 3"
_ ~-----,---j-~1 /8"0 HOLE @ - OPPOSITE CORNERS SIDE 118,. 1 8
r=3.,...._~-3"X3"X 10 GA. PLATE PER
BOTTOM DTL 5/ 4
PLATE
ALTERNATE
7 /16"'~ BOLT HOLE LOCAT!ON
1 1/2"X1 1/2"X
0.065" SLEEVE
ADJACENT RAMP
OR LANDING SECTION
1" MIN., 6" MAX.
1/ 8" TYPICAL JOIST TO SLEEVE
ALTERNATE BOLT LOCATION
DECKING
JOIST, TYP.
' 0
- tfr---3/8" M.8. TYP. THROUGH 1 1 /2" T.S.
I I SLEEVE II 1 1/4" JACK POST
-.---~~------------
ALTERNATE LOCATION
OF 1-#12 ST SMS
SLEEVE TO JACK POST
1/8
BOTTOM
PLATE
#12 ST SMS EA. SIDE OF
SLEEVE TO JACK POST
-1.,,l_ (2 SMS TOTAL)
ALTERNATE CONNECTION 3X
JACK POST TO SLEEVE
RAMP POST SLEEVES
BUILDING LINE
LANDING/DECKING
EDGE TUBE
1 1/4"X1 1/4"X 0.065"
JACK POST
3"X3"X 10 GA PLATE
PER DTL 5/4
1 1 /2"
(2) 5/1 6"¢ X3" LAGS TO BLDG. W/WOOD
BLOCKING OR RIM JOIST
1 1/2"X1 1/2"X 0.105" X 3" LONG
ANGLE W/(2) #12 SMS TO
LANDING
(2) #12 SMS TAPPING SCREWS
W/STEEL CHASIS BACKER
T.S.
1 1/2"
•
.... I I
I I
' I 0
- • 11 "'
7/16"• BOLT HOL
1 1/2"X1 1/2"X
.065" SLEEVE r -n,;;;,.-'-<3 SIDES, EACH SIDE & BOTTOM 1/8" 1/8
w
BOTTOM
PLATE
DECKING
3/8" M.B. TYP. THROUGH 1 1/2" T.S.
SLEEVE II 1 1 / 4" JACK POST
1 1/4"X1 1/4"X O.D65"
JACK POST
3"X3"X 10 GA. PLATE
PER DTL 5/4
#12 ST SMS EA. SIDE OF
SLEEVE TO JACK POST
(2 SMS TOTAL)
------~A~L~TE~R~N~A~TE=-.,C~O~N~N~EC~T~IO~N.,__ ___ --14X (BLANDING
72" O.C. MAX.
4" SLEEVE, TYP. -+-~ SCREWED TO H/R
JACK POST TO SLEEVE
POST SLEEVES 1 1/2"
OPTIONAL @ SLOPING HANDRAIL
12" LEVEL EXTENSION
OF HANDRAIL
1 3/8" DIA. X 0. 65"
I GALV. TUBE
.:::- , I
--- --- --- HANDRAIL BRACKET
PER DETAIL 9/-
1 1/2" X 1 1/2" POST-r---1..1----------_,,
CONNECT TO POST W/HANORAIL BRACKET
NOTE: SLOPE OF HANDRAIL TO MATCH SLOPE
OF RAMP OR LANDING SEE SHECT 2.
T.S.
(I) POST BASE MID SPAN POST 7
4 LANDING TO BUILDING
NOTE: DECK SECTIONS ARE FREE
STANDING FOR VERTICAL
LOADS.
Ci) OPTIONAL CONNECTION @ HANDRAIL DETAIL
2-#10 SMS BRACKET TO SINGLE
OR DOUBLE POST
TUBE VERTICAL
/>-- TYPICAL 1/2" X 1/2" INTERMEDIATE
VERTICALS, ALTERNATE 1/2"•
INTERMEDIATE VERTICALS
/"_::,.._""'° ____ 3/16" X 1 1/2" PLATE X LENGTH
AS REQUIRED
(CLAMP SYSTEM)
3/8"¢ THRU BOLTS
L_..J
HANDRAILS __ _,__
PER DETAIL 1/4 12" MIN. NOTE: LEFT SIDE SHOWN REVERSE OR
FLIP OVER FOR RIGHT HAND SIDE
1 1 /2"
OPTIONAL HANDRAIL DETAIL @ TOP OF STAIRS
RAMPS
TUBE VERTS
& SLEEVES
18"
I
I I
I I
~AX.
BEND EDGE
TUBES, TYP.
TOE @
NO SCALE
DECKING
I I
EDGE
TUBE
END OF
RAMP
HANDRAILS
RAMP
NO SCALE
2" OPTIONAL
OFFSET II
RAMP
NOTES:
CODES:
2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC)
DESIGN LOADS:
LIVE LOAD: 100 PSF
WIND LOAD: SEE SHEET 1
SEISMIC: SEE SHEET 1
HANDRAIL & GUARD RAIL LOADS:
50#/FT
200# POINT LOAD
MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS:
STEEL: ALL TUBE STEEL ASTM A-1008 CS TYPE AOR 8 (Fy - 40KS1) ALL STEEL TO BE COATED Wmi A RUST INHIBl11VE COATING
BOLTS: ASTM A307
PLYWOOD OPTION: APA RATED STRUCT I EXTERIOR PLYWOOD
WELDS, ALL WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO "AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY D-1.3-2008 FOR SHEET STEEL
ELECTRODES SHALL BE E70XX.
GENERAL NOTES:
1) RAMPS HAVING SLOPES STEEPER THAN 1 VERTICAL TO 20
HORIZONTAL SHALL HAVE LANDINGS AT TOP AND BOTTOM AND
AT LEAST ONE INTERMEDIATE LANDING SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH 30" OF RISE, PER CBC 118-405.7.
2) LOCATION OF LANDINGS.
LANDINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF EACH RAMP.
INTERMEDIATE LANDINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT INTERVALS NOT EXCEEDING 30 INCHES OF VERTICAL RISE AND AT EACH CHANGE OF DIRECTION . LANDINGS ARE NOT CONSIDERED IN DETERMINING THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF EACH RAMP.
NOTE: EXAMPLES OF RAMP DIMENSIONS ARE:
SLOPE MAX. RISE (INCHES) MAX. HORIZONTAL PROJECTION
1 :12 30 .30'-0"
1 :16 30 40'-o"
1:20 3D so'-o"
1 :15 3D .37'-6"
2. S!ZE OF TOP LANDINGS. TOP LANDINGS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 60 INCHES WIDE AND SHALL HAVE A LENGTH OF NOT LESS THAN 60 INCHES IN THE DIRECTION OF RAMP RUN, PER CBC 118-405. 7.2 AND .3 .
.3) DOORS IN ANY POSITION SHALL NOT REDUCE THE MINIMUM
DIMENSION OF THE LANDING TO LESS THAN 42" AND SHALL NOT REDUCE THE REQUIRED WIDTH BY MORE THAN 3" WHEN FULLY
OPENED, CBC 118-405.7.5.
4) RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS REQUIRED FOR STAIRWAYS. 5) THE SURFACE OF RAMPS SHALL BE ROUGHED OR SHALL BE OF SLIPRESISTANT MATERIAL, TYP. FOR LANDINGS & STAIRS. 6) RAMPS REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE PER CBC 118-405 .
7) RAMPS AND STAIRWAYS USED AS EXIT SHALL CONFORM TO CBC SEC. 1 009 SEC. 1010, CHAPTER 118 AND 118-405.5.
8) HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS SHALL CONFORM TO CBC 118-405.8 (RAMP), AND 11 B-504 (STAIRS).
9) RAMPS SHALL CONFORM TO CBC 118-405.
10) STRIKE EDGE EXTENSION THE WIDTH OF THE LANDING SHALL EXTEND 24" PAST THE STRIKE EDGE OF ANY DOOR OR GATE FOR EXTERIOR RAMPS AND 18" PAST THE STRIKE EDGE FOR INTERIOR RAMPS.
11) LANDING WIDTH. AT BOTTOM AND INTERMEDIATE LANDINGS, THE WIDTH SHALL BE AT LEAST THE SAME AS REQUIRED FOR RAMPS, CBC 118-405.7.4. 12) THE W1DTH OF RAMPS SHALL BE AS REQUIRED PER STAIRWAYS AND EXITS, CBC 118-405.5,
13) SLOPE RAMPS AND LANDINGS AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT ACCUMULATION OF WATER ON WALKING SURFACES.
14) ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO TITLE 24 CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 24, CCR.
PROPRIETARY DESIGN: THIS DRAWING AND THE MATERIAL CONTAINED THEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF TMP SERVICES, INC. AND SHALL
NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY
OR INDIRECTLY AND SHALL NOT BE USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO
ASSIST IN THE MAKING OF OR THE PURPOSE OF FURNISHING ANY
INFORMATION FOR THE MAKING OF DRAWINGS, PRINTS, APPARATUS OR
PARTS THEREOF WITHOUT THE FULL KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT OF
TMP SERVICES, INC- ALL PATENTABLE MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN AND ORIGINATED WITH TMP SERVICES, INC. SHALL BE THE PROPERTY OF TMP SERVICES, INC.
I§>::@ I
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC.
4091 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, SUITE 114 CHINO, CALIFORNIA 91710 MEMBER
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA
AMERICAN CONCRETE
INSTITUTE
(909) 613-0234
Fa~(909) 613-0238
"'
REVISIONS BY
..
~l',01 'i'SIO~.)
'I 1/..~<,;- "',i,' 1g, \ 1/ -- l. ' _,,.-_ \\1
\* <l' * 0>- lrc>ucru"''?'! ... "'h fl..,.. .... 0:: C.\\..\fO I 18 DATE
Of
....,,,,,...,,
(/) (/) 0
w I'- 0 I'-
(/) w ..,j O a, a,
f- u >LOtrJa,
_J <(NltrJ - a, trJ I
0 > (/) ,.,., - <( <( N ._
<( 0::: Vl U ,-,,N
z w z ~,..,, <( .. l().._
I- (/) a, LO - ._,a,
w a,(/) •• ..._,
0 o_ C'-.J a::: u.J ••
a,Wzx 0 2 N>O<(
0::: :c LL. z I- c..
<(
-
z
(t:'.
0 u...
-
_J
0 u...
0 ••
w w
I- r
= r (/) (/)
DRAWN
CHECKED
DATE
01 FEB. 2017 SCALE
JOB NO.
4 OF 8 SHEETS
32 ' 0 I
;,,
<>
.;
t;;
w
z
w
El
I;;
al
" " z
0. ::,
>-
6' -O"
INTERMEDIATE
LEVEL LANDING
41 1,
12"
Tj - - I • "' I
.. ) h \_5 I
I I
"' ,-- "· ' J "' ' II
"- ' [Tc\L • "' I
h \_.:___) HANDRAIL 12" .. I
I - ' I 3'-0"
TYPICAL PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
6' -o· INTERMEDIATE
LANDING
•
I§
V
.S'-0" ,·-n"
MAXIMUM SLOPE 1 : 12 TYPICAL (72" SECTIONS)
MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL LENGTH @ 1 : 12 SLOPE = 30'-0" " J < ffi
4X1 1/4X 1/8 BRACES PER SHEET 2 & 3
... ti: ::I N O C:
HANDRAIL A \_1/
I
µ
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I lj
u
h
I 1!
3'-0" I ""'-
'
6'-0" s'-o" 6'-0"
MAXIMUM SLOPE 1 : 12 TYPICAL (72" SECTIONS + APRON)
MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL LENGTH 111 1 : 12 SLOPE 30'-0"
I
I
I
12" MIN.
30" IMAX.
72" MIN.
BOTTOM LANDING SITE
INSTALLED BY OTHERS
I
I
I
I
6' -0 "
TOP LANDING
OPTIONAL LANDINGS 5'-0" X 7'-0" SEE
SHEET 2
=
' 0
I
J .. I
' F' z -Si t:!~ &-----f -1-1-1-1-17-
I I I I I I I
I I I I I lb
I I I I I 1{
/1
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
1_1_1_1_1 I ' / '
~===,
1_ - -====] I ______ J
L.NOTE: WHERE STAIRS
DO NOT OCCUR, GUARD
MUST BE PROVIDED
• _, 0
"'
,_
"' • 0
I
..
• "' I
N
-
" SEE SHEET 6
FOR OPTIONAL
STAIR DETAILS
VIEW OF ACCESSIBLE RAMP WITH SWITCH-BACK & PLATFORMS
MAXIMUM SLOPE 1 : 12 MAXIMUM LENGTH 30'-0"
I
w v,1/
3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" .1'-{l" :~·-n~ 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0"
72" MIN.
' - . MAX. SLOPE 1 , 12 MAX. LENGTH 30 0 BOTTOM LANDING 6' -O"
TOP LANDING
SEE SHEET 2 FOR OPTIONS
n • "
N
..
"r1:
J_..----
,_
'
-
• '" "'
OMIT VERT.
MEMBERS IF LANDING LESS THAN 30" ABOVE FIN. GRADE
\..1 1/2' 12" M 'MIN.
AX. TYP.
J'-o" 3'-o"
TYPICAL ELEVATION OF ACCESSIBLE RAMP W/SWITCH-BACK RAMP SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" \:,
I
i--
5'-0"
42"
MIN.
RAMP WIDTH TYP.
OPTION
LANDING SECTIONS
1 DOORS IN ANY POSITION
SHALL NOT REDUCE THE
REQUIRED WIDTH BY
MORE THAN 1 /2.
I
OPTJON 2 CAN
BE OPPOSITE HAND
---- I/ o' • J 42" MIN. 0 (,)
I RAMP RAMP
"' z -- ... ;; SECTION SECTION
30' O" MAX.
- ---
LANDING
SECTION
7'-o"
OPTION 2 6'-0" CLR.
1 6' O" CLR.
RAMP LANDING .. SECTION
SECTION
z ~.Q < ti 0: w
"'
1 1 OPTION 4 CAN
BE OPPOSITE HAND LANDING SECTIONS
- ----
0 I
'°
ZoN BE OP POSITE 3 CAN HAND I
\:,
I
i--
j
/ 42" MIN.
l~NDING RAMP
---- SECTION SECTION
7'-0" I
OPTION 3 5-0 ' "
1 LANDING SECTIONS
FILLER
1~ LANDING
SECTION SECIION
RAMP
... SECTION
RAMP
--
SECTION
z
;; o'
J
' (,) 0
"'
I
I
I
I
I I s'-o" I
I I I
'-----------'---/-----'----~-__ ~OPTION 5 CAN BE BUILT
OPPOSITE HAND
RAMP
-- LANDING
SECTION SECTION
FILLER
RAMP LANDING .. SECTION SECTION
J; 7'-6"
777///// / , l
LANDING I I
TYP. RAMP
1 '-0" LANDING SECTION
OPTION 6
OPTION 5 MULTIPLE LANDINGS AND
' 0 I
;,,
I
• <?
..
RAMPS
5'-0"
OPTION 4
.dZZZZZ/22 2 = J
< Ze, ' . o~(/) I ------~ z li:oz :i . zo ~o:'.\_
Oe£ b HANDRAIL- 0 W
to •oiVI EXTENSIONS
I '• 1o -~- - j
OPTION 7
---
""
">
0 PTIONAL TWO LANDING SECTION
RAMP
--SECTION
NOTE: SEE SHEET 2 FOR LANDING AND RAMP DETAILS,
SEE SHEET 6 FOR TYPICAL STAIRS
1 1/2"
GRADE
A
z
;;
' 0
I
"'
1 1/2" TYP. 111
HANDRAIL
HANDRAL
48"
60" WHEN OCCUPANT
LOAD = 300 OR MORE
,,---i-3 1/2" MAX., TYP.
NOTE: TYPICAL DECKING 12 GA. STEEL SLIP RESISTANT
1 1/2"
::::- ,,,..,;;;. -- -- _, _,.,.,., -::::- -~/ ..,_ ,..,.. ....... , _,..,..,.,. .............. ,.,...,,,.. --_......_ .....__ .............. _,.,,.. ,.,,,,._ --- -...x,-, ,..x, _,;:;.- -:::: ........ r--_,,,.~_.... 11 (MAX) ':::::....._ ,,,..~,.,... 1 -::::- -- -.....- .__,"7,..~ NOTE: 1 1/4"X1 1/4"X 1/8" ANGLE':::::....._ .,... ,:;::. .,... ANGLE BRACES REQUIRED TWO WA~;::::--..._ ,:;::..,... 0 TWO CORNERS OF TYP. -::::::
RAMP & LANDING SECTIONS FOR
RAMP & LANDINGS GREATER THAN
6" SPACE 48"
1 1/2"
60" WHEN OCCUPANT
LOAD = 300 OR MORE
1 1/2
--TYPICAL 1 1/2"
1 1/2"X1 1/2" X 0.065" T.S. @ BOTTOM OF GUARD (CURB)
--::::-_ --::::::-- ----::::-_ ---:::::-- --- -::::::- -------.::::::::--- --- -~<- -::::::- ::::::- -:::::- -::::- --- -::::- -::::::::.::-- ! 1 (MAX) -::::::::- --:::::- 1 -::::::::- - - 1 1/2" MIN. 12" MAX,, TYP.
TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS
DECK/LANDING, RAMP /LANDING 1 O" MAX. FILLER
r7 1 O" MAX. X 1 1/2" X 0.065" MIN. COLD ROLLED FILLER CHANNEL @ DECK #10 X 1 1/2" SELF TAPPING
SCREWS @ 24" O.C.
1 1/2'1<1 1/2'1< 0.065" T.S
TOPS OF GUARD, TYP.
1/2" X 1/2" INTERMEDIATES NOT TO EXCEED 4"
CLEARANCES
1 1/2"X1 1/2" X 0.065"
T.S. ll> DECK FRAMING
1 1/2"X1 1/2" X 0.065"
T.S. DECK SLEEVES
1 1/4"X1 1/4" X 0.065"
T.S. JACK POST
3" X 3" X 10 GA. le. TYP.
111 JACK POST BOTTOMS
w
J
"' "
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
DECK/LANDING, RAMP /LANDING
1 1/2" X 1 1/2" X 0.065" T.S.
DECK FRAMING, TYPICAL
B TYPICAL DECK CROSS SECTION
7/16" DIA.t-~-~
HOLE
1 O" M . FILLER
1 1 2" 3" 1 1 2"
rr-,r-11-11-71-7r- -1,- 11 II II II II II II 1111~..,..... II II II II II II II II
II II I II II II II II
II II II II II II II
II 11 11 11 11 11 II II II II II II II II
SCALE: 1 /2" = 1 '-0"
3/8" MACH. BOLTS 111 EA. SIDE TOP & BOTTOM, TYPICAL
-1r-rr-rr-1T-11
II II II II II
I II II II II
11 II 11 11 II II II II
II II II II
II 11 11 11
z
Q
Ci
J
w
ii)
w
b
z
ljj
"'
II 11 11 11 11 11 11 II II II II II II I
II 11 11 11 II 11 ,_,_.-,,-I -,-- 1 1/2" X 1 1/2" X 0.065"
TUBE STEEL FILLER
II II II II II II
11 II 11 11 11 11 II II II II II II
II II II II II II
II II II II II II
11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 II II II II II II II 11 I I
II
II II
II II
11 II II II
7/16" DIA.r----_ II II HOLE I -.....,..
-"1#-- 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 ll _ 1l _ .ll _ JJ _ _ll _ _JL _IL II II II II II II II • ~-~-_JL_JL_~=ll_Jl_.ll ..
C
-I I I
------------- ------------- __ L.~~_J_ -------------- -7r '--============= NOTE:
SEE SHEETS 2, 3 & 4 FOR
TYPICAL DECK & RAILING
CONSTRUCTION SEE SHEET
6 FOR TYPICAL STAIRS.
---11 11
SEE SHEET 4 FOR
ALTERNATE SMS IN LIEU
OF BOLTS
I I ADD 1/2" X 1/2" INTERMEDIATE
FILLER POST AS REQ'D TO
MANTAIN 4" MAX. SPACE
1 1/2" X 1 1/2" X 0.065" T.S. END POST (42")
TYPICAL GUARDRAIL FILLER
PROPRIETARY DESIGN: THIS DRAWING AND THE MATERIAL CONTAINED THEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF TMP SERVICES, INC. AND SHALL
NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY
OR INDIRECTLY AND SHALL NOT BE USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO
ASSIST IN THE MAKING OF OR THE PURPOSE OF FURNISHING ANY
INFORMATION FOR THE MAKING OF DRAWINGS, PRINTS, APPARATUS OR
PARTS THEREOF WITHOUT THE FULL KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT OF TMP SERVICES, INC. ALL PATENTABLE MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN AND ORIGINATED WITH TMP SERVICES, INC. SHALL BE THE PROPERTY OF TMP SERVICES, INC.
SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
I&~.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC.
4091 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, SUITE 114
CHINO, CALIFORNIA 91710
MEMBER
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
ASSOCIATION Of CALIFORNIA
AMERICAN CONCRETE
INSTITUTE
(909) 613-0234
Fox(909) 613-0238
REVISIONS BY
ciCENSE EXPIRES 6-30·18
OATESIGNEO
(/)
_J
- 0.. <(
2f-
<( w (/) 0 r--- 0 r---
O::'. 0 w c,_joa,o,
u > LC') t<) O> <( N I t<>
- a, t<l I
w > (/) t<)
<( <( N 0::: ll) u.,,-..N
w z ~,....,
_J u <( w II)
(/) ~o O>L()
rn <( - '--' a, 0, (/) ............
(D 0.... Na::: W •• a,WZx
(I) I N>O<t a::: :x: u..
I- c.. (/) u w f- u - u 5
<( (/)
<!
z
er:
0 LL.
-
_J
<!
0 LL.
0 . '
w w
I- I-
<! = I- U1 VJ
DRAWN
CHECKED
DATE
01 FEB. 2017 SCALE
JOB NO.
5 "'OF 8 SHEETS
33 " " 0
.;
t;;
w
,:
"' cl
w
" "' 5
N
0 " ,:
'"
z
" N
...
• 0
.,,
0 "' ,,;
" • .. tie ,,, 0
z
3/B"f BOLT @ 3 PLACES ALTERNATE USE #12 SMS
®
®
---------
TT-11-71-71-7
II II II II II
II II II II II
II II II II II
H----l+--ll--11--+-
H--tl--+f-""11---tII II II II
II II II II
II II II II
II II II II
II II II II
II II II
II II II II
II II II
II II II II
II II II II
II II II II II
II II II II
ll Jl _JJ_.JI
12" MIN.
HANDRAIL
----- -ir-rrII II
II II
II II
II
I I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I _IL_IL_J I
----------1 I =============ell -----------------1
12 GA. STEEL RISER AND TREADS CONTINUOUSLY
FORMED OR WELDED
CONTINUOUSLY
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
' ,,
'
TS 1 1/2"X1 1/2"X 0.065"
22" MAX.
SIDE
4" MAX. TO I&.
1/2"X /2"
INTER EDIATE VERTI LS,
ALTER JE 1/2"'
' ' '
INTER EDIATE VERT! LS
/
------1- HANDRAILS EXTEND 12"
PLUS THE WIDTH OF ONE TREAD BEYOND THE BOTTOM RISER
12"
LEVEL
TWO SIDES ONLY ..k-*----,-1/-,.8,-;-,-+------/ INTERMEDIATE VERTICALS
ALL LANDING
1/8" MIN. RADIUS, TYP.
TS 1-1/2" X 1-1/2" X 0.065" MIN. HANDRAILS
RAMP & STAIR GUARDS
'-+-¼-TS 1-1/2" X 1-1/2" X 0.065"
BOTTOM RAIL
1-1/2" X 1-1/2" X 0.065"
TS FRAMING - TYP.
VIEW
TYPICAL LANDING --,__
1/8
,
"'
II I
II I
II I
I I +------,.-"'----+--1
3/8"• BOLTS (3 TYP.) ALTERNATE USE #12 SMS
®
EDGE OF LANDING
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
51 MAX. SCALE· 1" - 1'-O"
3/8"0 BOLT
----------------n
,~ -TT-11-11-71-71 -ir-rr--I 1 , ----;;- 11 II II II II II 11 I 11 ,, 11 11 11 11 I I I II II II II II I I
48Q MINIMUM
44" MIN. CLEAR
11 I II II II II "'-'"<='~~l II I II II II II 11 1
II II II II II I I
II II II II II II I I
II II II II II I I
: / .1 3/8" X 0.065H ROUND
/ TS MIN HANDRAILS
II II II II II II I I
>:: :: :: :: II :: : I
II II II II II I
II II II II II II I I ,_
11 11 11 11 11 11 I I '-
11 II II II II II I
II II II II II II I I
II II II II II II I I
,. ll_ll_ JJ_ .JI _ _JL_IL_IL _J I
---------------~
3" MAX.
HANDRAIL
__,,_ __ _
-
- " z
in
tie 0
z 0 "' F z
<
,: i!
"' ,
... - '" "' 0
ll:
! I
~-----'l,---~===============l=ll-++----------------~t.-----1 ~----------------
NOTE: THE RISE OF STAIRS SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 4" OR
GREATER THAN 7'". THE RUN OF STAIRS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 11 ". STAIR RISERS OR RUNS SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 3/8" LARGER THAN THE SMALLEST ONE. :i STAIR TREAD SURFACES TO BE SLIP RESISTANT. , THE UPPER APPROACH AND ALL TREADS SHALL BE MARKED BY A STRIP OF CLEARLY CONTRASTING COLOR AT LEAST 2" WIDE, NO MORE THAN 1" FROM TREAD NOSING.
STRIP OF CONTRASTING COLOR TO BE AS SLIP RESISTANT AS
REMAINDER OF TREAD.
FRONT VIEW
-
~------------------------- ~-------------------------
,.,--'fS 1 1/2" X 1 1/2" ,,... TS GUARD
1 1/2"
HANDRAIL SPACE
SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"
1 3 8" 1 3 8"
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I OFFSET 3" X 3"X10 GA.
I I I BASE PLATE WITH
I 2-1/8' HOLES @
DIAGONAL CORNERS
3" 3"
@
X 0.065"
\
TYPICAL LANDING SEE APPROVED DRAWINGS
FOR INFORMATION.
\
#10 X 1 1/2" S.T. SCREWS @ 12" O.C. (RISER TO TS) 11" MIN., TYP.
I
SLOPE ...
I ANGLE TO ITS FRAMING 1/8"
I
,,--:-:,--r::---::---< METAL DECK 0
1 / 8" 1 • @ 6,. o.c. ANGLE FRAJMI
1/8" TO 1/2" RAOI S BULLNOSE TYP. @ TAJRS
ANGLE TO - 11- 8
-.. --'Ts FRAMI G
SLOPE ..
I
I
I
I
4 1 1/2" X 1 1/2" X 3/16"
ANGLE TO TS FRAMING
I
I
I
I
ANGLE TO TS FRAMING 118• TYP.
6 VERTJCA TO >----4---<STAIR ONN. SIM.
CONTINUOU LY FORMED 12 GA. STEEL RISE AND TREAD WELDED CO TINUOUSLY METAL DECK TO ~1 /-0=·,..., ANGLE FRAMING 7" MAX., 1YP. __ .,____ __ __,,'-_ SLOPE TREADS AT 2% SLOPE MAXIMUM
FOR DRAINAGE PER CBC SECTION
1009.6.1 AND 1009.6.2, 1YP.
._____ 3/8"• M.B.
O" NTS
EDGE OF STAIRS
4 1 1/2" X 1 1/2" X 3/16"
STRINGER
SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
(3\ EB / OR 4 TYP.
----
I z
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11" 11" 11"
33•
fc\
v
PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE
--
I
I
I
NOTE: PICKETS & 42" HIGH GUARD REQUIRED FOR
THRESHOLD HEIGHTS GREATER THAN 30"
ABOVE FINISH GRADE.
FOR THRESHOLD HEIGHTS LESS THAN 30"
ABOVE FINISH GRADE, PICKETS CAN BE OMITTED
& HANDRAIL WILL ACT AS GUARD.
------7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
r--J I
I r----- ,.__
I
I
I
I
fa\ I
I ~..:
u I
I , I .,
... I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I J. __ -
IC\
I -u I --------
I
I
I 1/8 V I
I
I
L ___
EA. LEG OF HORIZONTAL ANGLES TO VERTICAL
TUBES, TYP.
ADO ADDITIONAL TREADS, RISERS AND VERT s AS REQ'D FOR 60" MAX. LANDING HEIGHT @
PROPRIETARY DESIGN: THIS DRAWING AND THE MATERIAL CONTAINED THEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF TMP SERVICES, INC. AND SHALL
NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY
OR INDIRECTLY AND SHALL NOT BE USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO
ASSIST IN THE MAKING OF OR THE PURPOSE OF FURNISHING ANY
INFORMATION FOR THE MAKING OF DRAWINGS, PRINTS, APPARATUS OR
PARTS THEREOF WITHOUT THE FULL KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT OF TMP SERVICES, INC. ALL PATENTABLE MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN AND ORIGINATED WITH TMP SERVICES, INC. SHAUL BE THE PROPERTY OF TMP SERVICES, INC.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC.
4091 RIVERSIDE ORNE, SUITE 114 CHINO, CALIFORNIA 91710
MEMBER
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA
AMERICAN CONCRETE
INSTITUTE
(909) 613-0234
Fox(909) 613-0238
's;:
... REVISIONS BY
'
/?f!-.OFESS1~ :Y~~-;;-7'
LC .~ <1>JW () -z. t r " 10,360'"' ---~
*$ ~*
~~Jc-N"';_,i.'"" " :p;;- :C)\l)JlfO
UZJBIJSic -~ &W-'11
DATE SIGNED
Of
_J
<(
z
0 (/) " 0 -o~"'- - w w If) ti) a,
I- u > N I a, <( a, ti)
- "' I 0.. > U1 ti)
<C<(N~
0 O:'.'. U1 U ,,-..._N
w z ,,-..._ <( .. LO ._
(/) :,,:: w a, If) Cl ..__,a, - ...__,
(/) a, U1 ..
o_ Ne::W, . a,wZx
O::'. N>O<C - :I: LL
- I- e:: a..
<(
f-
(/)
<(
-
z
D:'.
0 Li.
-
_J
<(
u
Li.
0 ' ' w w
I- I-
<( - I- l/) V)
DRAWN ...
CHECKED
DATE
01 FEB. 2017 SCALE
JOB NO.
6 , OF 8 SHEETS
34 3' -0" MAX. SPACING OF VERTICALS
@ 4' -3" WIOE SECTIONS
2' -6" MAX. SPACING OF VERTICALS
@ 5'-3" WIDE SECTIONS
~-------71--'------f---...l.lL----------'--I==~-,
I I I I
> I < I i I
<.
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-~
i
I
I
I
I
1 1/2" X 1 1/2" X 1/8' ALUM. NGLE
lYP. @ EACH RIB --+--1_/_Bf-H--< OF AL M. PLANKS
~-~----_J
ADJACENT RAMP j j OR LANDING SECTION 72" MAX lYP. SEE SHEETS -'f· ____ _c;c_ ____ ___;c..=.....::::.::.:....:.::..:. _________ +· 2, 5, 6 & 8 FOR r f ADJACENT SECTIONS SEE PLAN SHEETS 2, 5 & 8 FOR ALTERNATE LANDING DIMENSION, DOORS, HANDRAILS, DIMENSIONS, ETC.
LANDING OR RAMP SECTION
12.00" "st
~.564" rit.500" OPTIONAL USE 6" WIDE PLANK
~--j-ALUMINUM
PLANKS 8 PER DETAIL0
1 B
ADJACENT RAMP OR
_______ -~DING SECTION ______ _[g]_ _________ --~1!:1~1 -i:==s::t:" ___ r 2"XS"X17" LONG HF#2~- I OR 2X6X23" LONG HF#2 I I PAD @ EA. POST lYP., I I g~1 Psi~s w~~~cf&ST I I ON CONCRETE OR ASPHALT I I
;~~~~8Nf J~E3;J~E@ I I GRADE PER DETAIL J/,2 I I AND JA/2 FOR 4' -3' WIDE I I SECTIONS I I
I I I I I I I I
I I SECTIONS PER DETAIL E OR F
I I SHEET 3. SEE PLAN SHEET 2,
DETAILS A & G FOR POST
I I REQUIREMENTS
• 0
ID
I I vi-CONNECT RAMP OR LANDING
JACK POST PER I I I
- - ~AIL ffi--_I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :::;-~: ;J;: :;;::::=;:;t__i NOTE,----- --- D ___________ @___________ l::.
CONNECTIONS FROM POST BASE ==:..J OR SILL PLATE TO GRADE NOT REQUIRED LATERAL FORCES RESISTED BY CONNECTION OF LANDING TO BUILDING 72" MAX lYP.
SEE PLAN SHEETS 2, 5 & 8 FOR ALTERNATE LANDING
DIMENSION, DOORS, HANDRAILS, DIMENSIONS, ETC.
FOOTINGS @ LANDING OR RAMP
1/8
1 1/2" X 1 1/2" X 0.093" _ __...__...--
ALUM. SLEEVE X 1 O" LONG
1 1/2" X 1 1/2"
VERTICALS @ HANDRAJL SECTIONS
PER SHEET 2
3/BH, THRU BOLT SEE SHEET 4
DETAJLS 3 & 4 FOR ALTERNATE
SMS IN LIEU OF BOLTS
ALUM. EDGE CHANNEL
1 1/2-6
2" _,.,--ALUM. PLANKS
SHIM DECK PLANKS AS REQ'D
FOR TIGHT FIT
SECTION 1A
1:;9~ 9;1_:;;.1_·~-~~1·_~-~~1-~-~~J ~-~[_ " f_ A= 1.313.;n.2--------------------------=r-!u~.1/2 X 1 1/2" X 1/8" 1 1/4" X 1 1/4" JACK POST PER DETAIL 3/4 Ix = 0.31 in:4-
Sx = 0.28 in.3
------------------------------- - ALUM. DECK PLANKING 2 12" TREAD
T
1.500"
l_
2" WIDE MIN.
CONTRASTING COLOR
SUP RESISTANT
WARNING STRIP
0.191"
2.333"
---ii-,-,----- 2.724"
7" MAX.
RISER
0.375" 0.375"
ALUM. STAIR
SCALE: 3/4" = 1"
2"
0. 1D0"'---iM-11--
~1--1,755"--t...ill
--.111-41--0 .. 008 "
0.1 04"·---1--
1.000"
0.281"
ALUM. SHEET 0.08"
THICK @ RISER
TREAD 4
__ t_=_0._12_5_"--~1-=:>-9-=-~aa1.=2~"=1,-y _-J.---ALUM. PLANK
1.5" -r A = 0.59 in.2
Ix = 0.39 in.4
Sx,.. 0.39 in. 3
ALUM. EDGE
SCALE: 3" - 1-0"
CHANNEL 6
;;; Q •
" !I:' .. • => " "
3/8"1& BOLT 3 PlACES
ALTERNATE
USE SMS
li PER DETAIL
® • " al
Q
z
:i;
ALUM. SLEEVE DETAIL 3
rr 11--rr-ir 7T
II II II II II
II II II II II
I_JL_ILJJ_
1-¾-lf--HII II II II
I II II II
II II II II II II
II II II II II II II
II
ALUM. TREAD
SCALE: 3" = 1 '-0"
12" MIN.
HANDRAIL
rr11-
II II
II II
II I
II I
II
II
II
II
II
' '
PER DETAIL0
TOP RAIL
4" MAX. ro SPACING
1/2" • INTER EDIATE VERTICALS
ALTE 1/2" x 1 /2" INTE EDIATE VERT! ALS
HANDRAILS EXTEND 24"
BEYOND THE BOTTOM RISER
ALL AROUND _.1c;------t----,--1 r.5-rr--, INTERMEDIATE VERTICALS 7" MAX.
TYP .
12" LEVEL WIT LANDING
• N
HANDRAIL
• " N
1/8" M!N. RADIUS
C EDGES (1YP.)
C,
z
in
:i! 0
z Q 0: z
:i;
• ;,;
• z
s " " ::,
:i!
Q
I
TS 1 1/4 X 1 1/4 X 0.065"
lYPICAL VERTICAL POST
OFFSET BASE le.'S ADJACENT POSTS, TYP, ALUM CHANNEL
STAIRS
SLOPE TREADS AT 2% SLOPE MAXIMUM
FOR DRAINAGE PER CBC SECTION 1009.6.1
AND 1009.6.2
5 SCALE: 3/4" = 1 '-0"
NOTE: PICKETS & 42" HIGH GUARD REQUIRED FOR
THRESHOLD HEIGHTS GREATER THAN 30"
ABOVE FINISH GRADE.
FOR THRESHOLD HEIGHTS LESS THAN 30"
ABOVE FINISH GRADE, PICKETS CAN BE OMITTED
& HANDRAIL WILL ACT AS GUARD.
PROPRIETARY DESIGN: THIS DRAWING AND THE MATERIAL CONTAJNED THEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF TMP SERVICES, INC. AND SHALL
NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY
OR INDIRECTLY AND SHALL NOT BE USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO
ASSIST IN THE MAKING OF OR THE PURPOSE OF FURNISHING ANY
INFORMATION FOR THE MAKING OF DRAWINGS, PRINTS, APPARATUS OR
PARTS THEREOF WITHOUT THE FULL KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT OF TMP SERVICES, INC. ALL PATENTABLE MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN AND ORIGINATED WITH TMP SERVICES, INC. SHALL BE THE PROPERTY OF TMP SERVICES, INC.
NOTES:
MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS: ALUMINUM:
1 1/4X 1 1/4X 1/8 ANGLE 6063 T5
2"X1 1/2''X1/8" CHANNEL 6063 T5
DECK PLANKS 6063 T5
STAIR PLANKS 6063 T5
BOLTS: ALUMINUM 6061-T6, 2024-T4 OR 7075-T73, ALTERNATE USE lYPE 304 STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS WITH STAINLESS STEEL
WASHERS.
WELDS: ALL WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO "AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY D1 .2-2008 FOR ALUMINUM", ELECTRODES SHALL BE 5356 OR
5554 FOR 6063-TS ALUMINUM & SHALL BE 5556 FOR 6061-T6
ALUMINUM.
SEE SHEET 4 FOR GENERAL NOTES
I§>~ I
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC.
4091 RNERSIDE DRIVE, SUITE 114 CHINO, CALIFORNIA 91710
t.4EMBER
srRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA
AMERICAN CONCRETE
INSTITUTE
(909) 613-0234
Fox{909) 613-0238
REVISIONS
DATE SIGNED
0 w
0 2
0.. J
LZ
<( L O:'. J
_j
w <( _j
(D _j
- <( (/) z
0 u 1- u 0..
<( 0
..
w
1--
-
(/)
..
01 (/)
w
u
>
a::
w
(/)
a._
2 IDRAWN
CHECKED
DATE
FEB.
SCALE
JOB NO.
7 BY
1a
-
z
l'.l'.'.
0 LL
-
.J
0 LL
0 w
IIV)
2017
OF a SHEETS
35 s' -a"
INTERMEDIATE
LEVEL LANDING
4 12"
rv -- • 0
I
;,,
I
I "---1/ "' ,,- I • ' " <O
"-
'-I~ • 0
I
"' HANDRAIL 12"
I
L
TYPICAL
SCALE: 1/4" - 1' O"
z
"'
Y"
•
j 3'-0"
PLAN
6'-0"
INTERMEDIATE
LANDING
3'-0" ,·-o·
I
I
I
I
MAXIMUM SLOPE 1 : 12 TYPICAL (72" SECTIONS)
MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL LENGTH @ 1 : 12 SLOPE = 30'-0" ::,
1 1/4X1 1/4X 1/8 BRACES PER SHEET 2 & 3
HANDRAIL
\___57
I I I I
I I
I I
I I I
1 h I I I I
3'-0" j =-- '
6'-0" 6' o· 6' O"
MAXIMUM SLOPE 1 : 12 TYPICAL (72 " SECTIONS + APRON)
MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL LENGTH @ 1 : 12 SLOPE 30' -0"
I
l
f
I
"' z"' Qc,,
-Ii: ::l N 0 C:
12" 1HANDRAIL
I
72" MIN.
BOTTOM LANDING SITE
INSTALLED SY OTHERS
s'-o" TOP LANDING
OPTIONAL LANDINGS
5'-0" X 7'-0"
SHEET 2
=
• 0 I
I
-..
iii -a-----1 -,-1-1-1-1-.--,
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,
/1
I I I I I I 'i'
I I I I I I I ;,,
I I I I I I I I I 11 I~ I 1_1_1_1 I ' , "
~= ____ ===; J ____ J _____ J
I
LNOTE: WHERE STAIRS
DO NOT OCCUR, GUARDRAILS
MUST BE PROVIDED
9 ;,,
·- "' • 0
I
;,,
• 0 I
-..
-
SEE SHEET 6
FOR OPTIONAL
ST,'JR DETAILS
VIEW OF ACCESSIBLE RAMP WITH SWITCH-BACK & PLATFORMS
MAXIMUM SLOPE 1 12 MAXIMUM LENGTH 30'-0"
I
J
'7'
."li' .I)" ."li' -n" "li' -0" ,, O" 3' O" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3' o· 72" MIN.
MAX. SLOPE 1 . 12 MAX. LENGTH 30 -0 " BOTTOM LANDING
72"
TOP LANDING
3' O" 3· o·
:,
•
::,
• 0
<D
___..-- OMIT VERT.
MEMBERS IF LANDING
LESS THAN 30" ABOVE FIN. GRADE
TYPICAL ELEVATION OF ACCESSIBLE RAMP W/SWITCH-BACK
W/ 5'-0" WIDE RAMPS
RAMP
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
b . I ",
;,, u
NOTE:
PS MANY RAMP OR
LANDING SECTIONS
CAN BE ADDED AS
NECESSARY TO MEET
SITE REQUIREMENTS
12" JOISTS TO MIN BUTT INTO 30•
HANDRAIL
EXTENSION
CONT. MEMBER
t-':----t--.._
s'-o"
30' -0" MAXIMUM LENTH OF TYPICAL RAMP
MAX. RAMP SLOPE 1 : 12
OPTION 1 THRESHOLD FLASHING TO FILL GAP -
ATTACH WITH TUBE W/(4) #10 X 1 1/2" SCREWS
1"~ SEE~
TYPICAL ANGLE BRACING 16 GA. V 1 1/4" X 1 1/4" X 1/8"
WHEN LANDINGS & RAMPS
EXCEED 24" IN HEIGHT SEEj------1,.
s'-o" 6'-0"
BUILDING
/
I 24" I
EXTERIO \
' I CLEAR
I ' I
__ J -----....
@ 5' -0" WIDE 72" BOTTOM MAX TYPICAL RAMP SECTION MANUFACTURED IN 72" SECTIONS LANDING +-.,-LA7:N;;D°'IN"G;=-;,S~IT"°E~--1,---------==~=~==~=======~==~---------tlNSTALLED BY OTHERS NOTE: MAXIMUM LENGTH OF EACH SECTION OF RAMPS ARE 30' -0" :S II 811 II '-
z
':a "'
" 11
4 I
I
__ J
TYPICAL PLAN VIEW OF ACCESSIBLE RAMP & DECK LAYOUT SCALE: 1/4" = 1 '-0" NOTE:
AS MANY RAMP OR
LANDING SECTIONS
CAN BE ADDED AS
NECESSARY TO MEET
SITE REQUIREMENTS SEE DTL. 8/4
SEE DETAIL 11/4 FOR ALTERNATE TOE @ END OF RAMP
12·
1"
WHEEL GUIDE
TYPICAL 1 1/2"X1 1/2"X16 GA. RAIL POST @ 3'-0" O.C.
NOTE:
SEE SHEET 2 FOR
OPTIONAL LANDING
• 0
I
;,,
• 0
I .
• 0
I
;,,
4 4
~--- TYPICAL ANGLE BRACING
1 1/4" X 1 1/4" X 1/8"
WHEN LANDINGS & RAMPS
HANDRAIL
EXTENSION
12" MIN.
30" MAX. EXCEED 24" IN HEIGHT SEE SHEET 3
OPTIONAL TOE PLATE
PER DTL.t---i TYPICAL 1 1/4"X1 1 4"X16 GA. JACK POST
6'-0" 6'-0"
TY ICAL 3'-0"
6'-0"
3'-0"
6'-0"
1 TYPICAL
3'-0"
/
~+---;;!---,,+--EQUAL
7'-0" TYP. POST
TYPICAL ELEVATION OF ACCESSIBLE RAMP & DECKING 30" OR LESS SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
NOTE:
AS MANY RAMP OR
LANDING SECTIONS
CAN BE ADDED AS
NECESSARY TO MEET
SITE REQUIREMENTS
b ' I ", ;,,u
HANDRAIL
EXTENSION
72" BOTTOM
12"
MIN
30"
MAX
LANDING SITE INSTALLED BY OTHERS
6'-0" 6'-0"
OPTION 1 THRESHOLD FLASHING TO FlLL GAP -
ATTACH WITH TUBE W/(4) #10 X 1 1/2" SCREWS
1"~ SEE9
.,16GA. V
TYPICAL ANGLE BRACING 1 1/4" X 1 1/4" X 1/8" SEE
MAX. RAMP SLOPE 1 12
6'-0"
TYPICAL RAMP SECTION MANUFACTURED IN 72" SECTIONS
NOTE: MAXIMUM LENGTH OF EACH SECTION OF RAMPS ARE 30'-o" (FOR MAXIMUM RAMP PROJECTION, SEE • ATTACHMENT 1 ABOVE) 72" LANDING MIN.
DOOR WIDTH PLUS 24
---:S II 811 II
"' 1'i • N " ..
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
r
I
• 0
I
-.. • 0
I .,
• 0
I
..
DESIGN
TYPICAL PLAN VIEW OF ACCESSIBLE RAMP & DECK LAYOUT OVER 30" DESIGN 0 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-D" 11/4 FOR ALTERNATE TOE @ END OF RAMP / 4 \ .-SEE DETAIL 4" MAX. CENTER "--V A TO CENTER/
(3\TYP, \: ,- WHEEL GUIDE
~_,) z SEE DTL. 87 4" MAX. CENTER ':a
• 12" MIN. TO CENTER
30" MAX. I 1.---T'fPICAL ANGLE BRACING
-- 1 1/4" X 1 1/4" X 1/8" SEE SHEET 3
::, .1,- PROVIDE SUPPORTS FOR " "' 1 1/2 X 1 1/2 X 0.065" @ " EDGE BEAMS @ 3' -0" O.C. ' 0: • 1 3' I TYPICAL /: .. TYPICAL • "' .,._~I "'- 0 og • N ::, <O
N "' V) 3'
" PTIONAL TOE PLATE / H -...., ..J TYPICAL SECTI07 PER DTL. STD • TYPICAL 3• a" 3' o· I 3' o" 3°-0" I 3'-0" . ' 18''- '-TYP. 6' 0" 6' O" 6' O" e'-o" 6' 0" POST 12" MIN. PAST TOE OF RAMP MAX.
LEVEL WITH LANDING
TYPICAL ELEVATION OF ACCESSIBLE RAMP & DECKING SCALE, 1/4" = 1'-o" PROPRIETARY DESIGN: THIS DRAWING AND THE MATERIAL CONTAINED THEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF TMP SERVICES, INC. AND SHALL
NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY
OR INDIRECTLY AND SHALL NOT BE USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO
ASSIST IN THE MAKING OF OR THE PURPOSE OF FURNISHING ANY
INFORMATION FOR THE MAKING OF DRAWINGS, PRINTS, APPARATUS OR
PARTS THEREOF WITHOUT THE FULL KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT OF TMP SERVICES, INC. ALL PATENTABLE MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN AND ORIGINATED WITH TMP SERVICES, INC. SHALL BE THE PROPERTY OF TMP SERVICES, INC.
I§>)@ I
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC.
4091 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, SUITE 114 CH!NO, CALIFORNIA 91710 MEMBER
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA
AMERICAN CONCRETE
INSTITUTE
(909) 613-0234
Fax{909) 613-0236
REVISIONS BY
..
DATE SIGNED
(/)
z
0 -
I-
<i
> (/) 0 _J r,,. 0 r,,.
w ,O
w w LI') 0, 0,
u > N r,t) o, <( o, I r,t)
- "" I 0.. > (/) r,t)
Cl:::: <(<(N~ (I) U ,....._N
<i w z ~,.....,
(/) <( __ L()_
0:: (/) :,,: w 0, LI')
o'-"m
- ........ 0, (/) ••
w 0... NO::W ..
w mwZX - N>0<( _J > - ::c "- (D I- 0:: a..
-
(/) z (/) <i w _J
0 0..
0 <i
<{
-
z
re::
0 LL
-
_J
<{
0 LL
0 ..
w w
r= I-
<{ = I- (!) (/)
DRAWN
CHECKED
DATE
01 FEB. 2017 SCALE
JOB NO.
8 OF 8 SHEETS
36 Medium Solar Light Towers
Four high-output LED lights on 20-foot tower
Long run times
Automatic and manual operating modes
Battery powered and solar charged
Maintenance-free AGM batteries
Wanco’s Medium Solar Light Towers provide bright lighting for areas up to 9,900 square feet, with longer run times than our small light tower. Common applications include overflow parking lots, small construction sites, material staging areas and freight yards.
These light towers feature four high-efficiency, high-output LED light fixtures that provide twice the light of our small light tower. The 20-foot telescoping tower rotates nearly 360 degrees without lowering the lights, which operate at any height. The lights can be individually aimed without the use of tools, and they stay where you point them. The tower remains vertical at all times, and the trailer’s low center of gravity keeps the tower stable.
Batteries provide power and an automated solar-based charging system keeps the batteries charged. Functions include manual control and a choice of automatic modes that include dusk-to-dawn operation. Autonomous operation is possible from spring through fall in most locations.
Brief specifications
Lights Four adjustable light fixtures
Luminosity 13,500 lumens per fixture
54,000 total lumens
Coverage area 9900 sq. ft.
Power draw 100 watts per light fixture
Light height 20 feet when fully extended; lights operate at any height Batteries 800 Ah, wired as a 24-volt system
Solar 1050 W
Charger 40 A
Deployed footprint 181×111 in. (460×282 cm), L×W
Deployed height 236 in. (599 cm)
Travel height 108 in. (273 cm)
Weight, approx. 1900 lbs. (862 kg)
Options
Light fixtures Four 60 W
Four 100 W*
Batteries Four AGM, 400 Ah total capacity
Eight AGM, 800 Ah total capacity*
Solar 600, 900 or 1050* watts
*Pictured
4 Wanco® Solar Light Towers
37 38
39 40
41 42
Attachment:
C. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 22-01
www.oxnard.org/city-department/community-development/planning/environmentaldocuments/ 43 Attachment:
D. General Plan Consistency Table
44 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
Attachment D - General Plan Consistency
Attachment D
General Plan Consistency Table
for Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility Industrial Limited (ILT) and Park (PRK) Designations
Policy Level Policy or Title Explanation
SC-1.1 II Inventory and Monitor GHG
Emissions
GHG emissions associated with
the proposed project have been
quantified. Refer to EIR
Section 5.8, Greenhouse Gas
Emissions.
SC-2.3 II Sea Level Rise Consideration in
DecisionMaking
The 2030 General Plan Figure
2-1, California Flood Risk: Sea
Level Rise (Oxnard area),
depicts the extent of a coastal
storm flood event after sea
level has increased by 5.2
inches by the year 2030. Per
Figure 2-1, the project site is
not presently mapped in an area
that could be subject to sea
level rise by the year 2030.
SC-3.8 II Require Use of Passive Energy
Conservation Design
The proposed project includes
solar lighting.
CD-1.2 I Infill Development, Priority to
Mixed Use
The proposed project is
surrounded by urban
development and therefore is
infill development. The project
results in fewer vehicle
trips/vehicle miles traveled and
less greenhouse gas emissions
than current operations. The
proposed project is sustainable
development with features such
as native landscaping and solar
lighting.
CD-1.10 II Jobs-Housing Balance The proposed project would be staffed by 14 employees, which
45 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
Attachment D - General Plan Consistency
would add jobs on a site
designated for industrial uses.
CD-3.1 II Neighborhood Preservation The proposed project includes a 30-foot landscaped buffer and
fencing along Hueneme Road
and Perkins Road.
The closest residential uses are
located east of Saviers Road
and north of Hueneme Road.
The proposed project does not
introduce industrial uses north
of Hueneme Road, thus, the
existing residential
neighborhoods north of
Hueneme Road would not be
subject to encroachment of
industrial uses.
The EIR reviews all
environmental topical areas and
the analysis concludes that the
proposed project minimizes or
mitigates all environmental
impact to less than significant
levels.
CD-5.1 I Industrial Clustering The proposed project is located in an area of the City zoned for
industrial uses. The Advanced
Water Purification Facility
(AWPF) is located immediately
adjacent to the site, and
permitted coastal dependent
industrial uses are located to
the west of the project site.
Proposed industrial
development to the east of the
project site is in the permit
process.
CD-5.2 II Compatible Land Use The proposed project includes 46 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
Attachment D - General Plan Consistency
a 30-foot landscaped buffer and
fencing along Hueneme Road
and Perkins Road.
The closest residential uses to
the project site are located east
of Saviers Road and north of
Hueneme Road.
The project site location on the
south side of Hueneme Road
provides additional buffering
between the proposed project
and residential uses north of
Hueneme Road to ensure land
use compatibility issues are
less than significant.
Additionally, noise, air quality,
and odor impacts associated
with the proposed project have
been reviewed and analyzed in
the EIR (Section 5.3, Air
Quality, and Section 5.13,
Noise).
CD-5.3 I Available Services The proposed project is located in an area of the City with
access to municipal services,
connections to water and storm
drain facilities, and access to a
variety of transportation
options, including vehicle, bus,
bicycle, and walking.
CD-5.4 II Environmentally Friendly and
“Green” Industry
The proposed project would
reduce pollution and noise
from the current conditions of
the operator which transports
vehicles to and from the Port at
a greater distance than the
proposed project location.
CD-5.5 I “Green” Major Transportation The proposed project is located 47 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
Attachment D - General Plan Consistency
Routes on the southern side of
Hueneme Road, which is a
commercial truck route, and
would facilitate goods
movement to/from the Port of
Hueneme along a roadway
designed for such purpose
without decreasing the level of
service (EIR Section 5.19,
Transportation).
CD-8.1 II Limiting Development The proposed project is located in an area of the City serviced
by existing utilities,
transportation and service
systems.
CD-8.2 II Services Necessary public services and
facilities for the proposed
project have been reviewed by
the City of Oxnard as part of
the project application process
and in the EIR. The review has
concluded that the proposed
project would provide all
required on-site facilities that
would connect to off-site
service systems and that the
proposed project would result
in less than significant impacts
to these systems.
CD-8.5 II Impact Mitigation The EIR includes a review and discussion of all environmental
topical areas, and the impact
analysis concludes that the
proposed project minimizes or
mitigates all environmental
impacts to less than significant
levels.
CD-8.9 II Jobs/Housing Balance &
Sustainable Communities Strategy
(SB 375)
The proposed project is
considered infill development
and would be staffed by 14
48 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
Attachment D - General Plan Consistency
employees. The EIR (Section
5.19, Transportation) concludes
that the proposed project would
result in fewer vehicle
trips/vehicles miles traveled
than current operations.
CD-9.2 I Revitalization and Redevelopment The proposed development will revitalize a vacant and
undeveloped parcel along
Hueneme Road, which is a
scenic roadway, and includes
new landscaping.
CD-9.4 I View Corridor Preservation The proposed project includes a 30-foot landscaped buffer
along Hueneme Road and a
25-foot landscaped buffer
along Perkins Road and
complies with City design
requirements.
CD-14.1
CD-14.2
II Design review process
Development Advisory Committee
(DAC) Function
The Development Advisory
Committee (DAC) review
process led to changes in the
Project and/or conditions of
approval that meet these Level
II policies.
CD-15.1 II Quality of Life The proposed project would
provide new employment
opportunities in the City for up
to 14 employees, which is
intended to enhance the
business operations of the
Port’s customer and the
customer’s employees.
CD-15.9 II Regional Cooperation The proposed project supports the local and regional economy
by providing support to a large
business operator at the Port of
Hueneme.
CD-16.3 II Balanced Economic Base The proposed project supports 49 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
Attachment D - General Plan Consistency
the City’s industrial sector and
economic base with the
addition of employment
opportunities.
CD-16.5 II Industrial and Commercial
Development Standards
The proposed development is
proposed on an existing
industrial zoned lot and
potential impacts have been
mitigated to less than
significant levels (refer to EIR).
CD-17.1 II Retain Local Talent The proposed project would provide new employment
opportunities in the City for up
to 14 employees.
CD-17.6 II Business Expansion The proposed project supports the local and regional economy
by providing support to a large
business operator at the Port of
Hueneme and would provide
new employment opportunities
in the City for up to 14
employees.
CD-20.1 I Port Trade Enhancement The proposed project supports Port Trade Enhancement by
providing a temporary outdoor
vehicle storage facility to
support a large business
operator at the Port of
Hueneme.
ER-10.1 I Promote use of Native and Water
Wise Plants
The Project incorporates native
and water wise plants to be
compatible with nearby
vegetation and is conditioned
to comply with City’s
Landscape and Water
Conservation Standards
(Ordinance No. 2822) and
applicable water conservation
requirements of the State of
California.
50 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
Attachment D - General Plan Consistency
SH-6.4 II New Development Noise
Compatibility
The proposed project would
result in less than significant
impacts related to noise (EIR
Section 5.13, Noise).
MC-3.1 II New Development to Protect
Operations
The proposed project would
not result in military use
conflicts (EIR Section 5.11).
MC-3.2 II Vertical Obstructions The proposed project includes one temporary structure (guard
house) and temporary light
fixtures, along with permanent
site perimeter fencing and
landscaping. Thus, there would
not be temporary structures or
permanent fixtures (i.e.,
lighting, fencing) that are more
than 200 feet above ground
level, and as such the proposed
project is not subject to FAR
Part 77.
MC-3.4 II Reference the Navy’s Military
Influence Area Map
The project site is located
within the Military Influence
Area for Naval Base Port
Hueneme and Naval Base Point
Mugu. Naval Base Ventura
County has received
notification of the proposed
project from the City, which
includes the Notice of
Preparation (NOP) of an
Environmental Impact Report
for the proposed project, and
provided comments that are
analyzed in the EIR (Section
5.11, Land Use).
All Others III All policies not listed above No or Distant Applicability to the Proposed Project.
51 Attachment:
E. Zoning Code Development Standards Consistency Table
52 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
Attachment E - Zoning Code Consistency
Attachment E
Zoning Code Consistency Table
for Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility Light Manufacturing (M-1-PD) Zone
Development
Standard
Oxnard City
Code Citation
Standard Proposed Project Complies with
Development
Standard?
Minimum Lot Size Section 16-164 15,000 square feet 33.6 acres (1,467,972 square
feet)
Yes
Minimum Lot Width
Interior Lots
Corner Lots
Section 16-164
100 feet
150 feet
N/A
465 feet
Yes
Maximum Building
Height
Section 16-164 55 feet Guard House:
10.25-feet high and
would be raised by
2.75 feet for a total
height of 13-feet.
Yes
Front Yard Setback Section 16-164
Section
16-165(D)(3)(a)
10 feet; 30 feet when
adjacent to designated
thoroughfare
Hueneme Road –
30 feet
Yes
Side Yard Setback Section 16-164
Section
16-165(D)(3)(b)
None. No side yard
setback required along
interior property lines
where the abutting
zoning is M-1 or M-2.
0 feet Yes
Rear Yard Setback Section 16-164
Section
16-165(D)(3)(c)
Equivalent to height of
structure
18 feet Yes
Street Side Yard
Setback
Section 16-164 Same as Front Yard
Setback
Perkins Road – 30
feet
Yes
Setback from
Residential Zoned
Property
Section 16-164 30 feet; same setback
applies if parcel abuts
an alley separating the
115 feet Yes
53 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
Attachment E - Zoning Code Consistency
parcel from a
residential zone; see
Section 16-165
Maximum Lot
Coverage
Section 16-164 70% Less than 1% Yes
Maximum Floor Area
Ratio
Section 16-164 70% Less than 1% Yes
Minimum Lot Depth Section 16-164 150 feet measured at
right angles to the front
property line
378 feet Yes
Walls Section
16-165(D)(4)(b)
A 6-foot solid
decorative masonry
wall or other type of
visual buffering, such
as landscaping,
architectural treatment,
or combination thereof
shall be provided and
maintained on the
boundary. On the front
or side front portion of
the property, the wall
or visual buffer shall be
placed in a location to
provide the necessary
screening from the
public right of way
6-foot-high
chain-link fence
with landscaping
along entire project
boundary
Yes
Landscaping – Front
Yard Setback
Section 16-
165(D)(6)(b)(2)
Entire front yard
setback shall be
landscaped, with the
exception of that area
provided for vehicle or
pedestrian access.
Hueneme Road –
30 feet landscaping
and fencing
Perkins Road – 25
feet landscaping
and fencing
Yes
Undergrounding
Utilities, Lighting and
Trash Enclosures
Section
16-165(D)(7)(a)
and Section
16-165(D)(7)(b)
All trash enclosures,
on-site lighting, and
utility lines, including
but not limited to,
electric,
The proposed
project includes the
installation of water
lines for
landscaping to
Yes
54 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
Attachment E - Zoning Code Consistency
communication, street
lighting, and cable
television, shall be
installed in accordance
with this code.
Appurtenances and
associated equipment,
including but not
limited to,
surface-mounted
transformers, pedestal
mounted terminal
boxes, meter cabinets,
and concealed ducts in
an underground
system, may be placed
above ground if
approved as part of the
project plan and
provided that such
facilities are adequately
screened by
landscaping or other
means.
support the
temporary vehicle
storage facility. The
proposed project
would be supplied
with 96-gallon trash
and recycling
containers from the
City of Oxnard
Environmental
Resources Division.
Source: Oxnard City Code, Chapter 16, Zoning Code, Division 11, Industrial Zones 55 Attachment:
F. Public Comment Letters
56 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
Attachment F - Public Comment Letters
Attachment F
Public Comment Letters
No. Name Date
1 Alex Mireles 2.14
2 Alex Mireles 2.14
3 Sandra Arroyo 2.14
4 Yesenia Ponce 2.14
5 Jasmine Martinez 2.14
6 Lucas Grandcolas 2.14
7 Linda Gray Calderon 2.14
8 Ron Whitehust 2.14
9 Erica Helson 2.14
10 Insert n 2.14
11 Mary Duncan 2.14
12 Elizabeth Segura 2.14
13 Coastal Keepers 2.14
14 Adriana Sanchez 2.14
15 Valerie Lavenza 2.14
16 Javier Gomez 2.15
17 Saraisabel Virgen 2.15
18 Diane Pina 2.15
19 Michael Landeros 2.15
20 Fatima Munoz 2.15
21 Michael L. Doto II 2.16
57 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
Attachment F - Public Comment Letters
22 Chuck Caulkins 2.17
23 Len Mazzella 2.23
24 Daniela Soleri 2.24
25 Monique Sonoquie 2.24
26 Yudin Roa 2.25
27 Christiane Schlumberger 2.27
28 Sam Stewart 2.27
29 Sarah Shahbazian 2.28
30 Francisco Tapia 3.2
31 Irene Rauschenberger 3.2
32 Irene Rauschenberger 3.8
33 Irene Rauschenberger 3.8
34 CAUSE et al. 7.1
35 Esequiel Vargas 8.3
36 Sanaz Shirazi 3.21
37 Jay Turner 3.21
38 Irene Rauschenberger 3.23
39 Lucia Marquez et al. 3.21
40 Loan Ado 8.8
41 Rose Calleros 8.8
42 Yesenia Guzman 8.8
43 Daniel Torres 8.8
44 Elizabet Arellano 8.8
45 Loan Ado 8.8
58 Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility; PZ No. 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 20, 2022
Attachment F - Public Comment Letters
59 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Public Comment on Port DEIR PZ 18-500-02
Alex Mireles <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 5:13 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Dear Jay:
Attached is a public comment letter on the City's DEIR on the Port's proposed project on behalf of LULAC Oxnard Council #3147.
Thank you
Alex Mireles, President
LULAC, Manuel Lopez- Council 3147
Oxnard LULAC 3147 Letter.pdf
187K
60 1
February 11, 2022
Jay Dobrowalski, Senior Planner
City of Oxnard Planning Division
214 South C Street Oxnard, CA 93030
Re: Port Project Draft EIR (PZ 18-500-02)
Dear Mr. Dobrowalski:
On behalf of the LULAC Oxnard Council #3147, I submit this letter to acknowledge the results of the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Port vehicle storage facility – one mile away from the Port.
LULAC is the largest and oldest Hispanic organization in the United States. LULAC advances the economic condition, educational attainment, political influence, housing, health and civil rights of Hispanic Americans through community-based programs operating at more than 1,000 LULAC councils nationwide. The organization involves and serves all Hispanic nationality groups. Our Oxnard Council focuses on equitable distribution of city services, economic justice, and voter outreach and education initiatives.
That is why we felt it was important to highlight what many residents and organizations already know:
the storage project is an environmental benefit to the community, especially the Latino community.
There is lots of misinformation about the increased use of trucks and pollution from this specific project.
This project actually works to eliminate the use of diesel-powered trucks by consolidating vehicle storage locations into one central location one mile away from the Port. Vehicle Miles Traveled is also dramatically reduced, thereby improving air quality.
For instance, imported cars are driven individually or transported using diesel powered trucks through Ventura Road to a storage facility off of Johnson Drive in Ventura and then back to the Port. There are 10 census tracts on the Ventura Road corridor with an average Latino population of 70%. Six of these census tracts also have the highest incidents for asthma in Oxnard according to Cal Enviro Screen. By moving their storage facility one mile away from the Port, thousands of cars and trucks will be removed from this busy corridor which will result in a reduction of auto and truck emissions of 80%.1 This results in increased quality of life for the surrounding Latino community due to improved air quality and less traffic.
1 Port of Hueneme, “Auto Emissions Reduction and Job Creation Project Details,” https://www.portofhueneme.org/wpcontent/uploads/2022/02/POH_Local_Community_Benefits_8.5x11Flyer_Final_Web.pdf 61 2
Further, diesel powered auto transporters heading to a storage facility in Camarillo will also be removed from the very busy Hueneme Rd. corridor resulting in improved air quality for the low-income Latino families that we serve in the Southwinds neighborhood.
The Draft EIR confirms that the status quo – trucking cars to Ventura and Camarillo is environmentally inferior to the proposed project on key metrics, including Air Quality and Green House Gas emissions.2 Further, we are requesting that the Lead Agency study the impact to Air Quality and Green House Emissions from the amount of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) that would be eliminated by this auto storage consolidation project. In addition, the Lead Agency should also study the Air Quality and Green House Emissions impacts of the elimination of diesel-powered car carriers that currently transverse Ventura Rd and Hueneme Rd to shuttle cars to the current offsite locations. Doing so would further prove that this project is a step in the right direction toward addressing the distressing impact of climate change. The status quo is not acceptable for our families and the health of our children.
Aside from the improved air quality and GHG emission reductions resulting from this project, the subject property gets a much-needed restoration. The property is unsafe, unsanitary, and the soil is disturbed and growing mostly non-native grasses and weeds.3 When the Port vacates the site after 5-years, the property’s restoration will last for years beyond the proposed use. We also envision this being a gateway to Ormond Beach and the Port is the ideal partner to help facilitate this vision. Not doing anything and leaving this property as-is will not get us there.
Further, there has been much speculation and criticism that the Draft EIR does not take into account the Port’s future plans for a larger logistics center. We believe that a speculative project with no details on the scope of operations is irrelevant and out of scope to this Draft EIR. This line of reasoning is merely a distraction from the conclusive results of this DEIR – that this project has no or less than significant impact on key environmental metrics.
If this project had significant impacts to the environment, we would not be in favor regardless of the number of jobs it would create as the health and safety of the Latino community surrounding this project is paramount to LULAC’s mission. According to the Draft EIR, this is not the case.
This project presents the community with many benefits, in addition to improved air quality and a reduction of dangerous GHG emissions, this project also restores a long vacant property which will keep our community safer. We believe in the principles of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design which states that the design of buildings, landscaping and outdoor environments can either encourage or discourage crime. CPTED attempts to minimize crime and the fear of crime by reducing criminal opportunity. With perimeter fencing, curated landscaping, access gates, perimeter lighting, security cameras, and 24-hour security, this is accomplished and the surrounding community is safer.4 2 Draft EIR, Volume I, Section 6.7, “Alternative Two” 3 Draft EIR, Volume I, Section 5.4.5, “Sensitive or Special Status Biological Resources, or Riparian Habitats, or Natural Communities.
4 Draft EIR, Volume I, Section 5.17.5 Police Protection - Proper Mitigation Measures 62 3
Finally, this project will employ local union skilled and trained construction workers to prepare and restore the property. Additionally, due to increased capacity to store vehicles offsite there will be more vehicles to offload thereby creating additional job opportunities for unionized longshore workers. This project creates more union jobs. These are not “low wage” jobs.
In sum, it is very clear from this Draft EIR that this project is not only safe for the community, but a community benefit, one that will last beyond the proposed use. We only ask that the positive impact to air quality and reduction of Green House Gas emissions due to the consolidation of vehicle storage sites be analyzed in the Final EIR.
Sincerely,
Alex Mireles
President
Oxnard LULAC Council #3147
63 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Fwd: port signatures
Alex Mireles <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 5:19 PM To: [email protected]
Supplemental Public Comments for Port DEIR Project
Hello Jay -Local 585's Business Manager, Anthony Mireles previously submitted a letter on behalf of Laborers, Local 585 on February 2nd. Pleasee append the following petition to his comment letter if possible.
Thank you,
Alex Mireles, Vice President
Business Representative, Development
LiUNA Local 585
21 S. Dos Caminos Ave
Ventura, CA 93003
Office Phone- (805) 643-5487
Cell phone (805) 340-8303
LiUNA Local 585
Community Petition in Support of Port Project_Laborers585.pdf 559K
64 OXNARD WORKING FAMILIES FOR RESPONSIBLE
PORT GROWTH SUPPORT THE GREEN 34 ACRE
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT.
This project will:
• CREATE JOBS
• HELP THE ENVIRONMENT
• INVEST IN LOCAL FAMILIES
The Port of Hueneme is planning to lease a property in South Oxnard that will create hundreds of LOCAL jobs for the trades. The property needs to be restored and prepared for use. This will lead to immediate jobs for Laborers, increased tax dollars for the city, and support for our local business community.
The project is also good for the environment as the Laborers will help restore a lot that has been vacant for 25 years by planting native plants, removing trash, and carefully laying gravel. Cars (and soon electric cars) will be stored there instead of being trucked 9 miles away.
The result is a beautiful community project that’s good for the environment, invests in local families and keeps families working.
OUR PEOPLE, OUR PORT!
Sign the petition below to let the City of Oxnard know that you want this project approved!
65 66
67 68
69 70
71 72
73 74
75 76
77 78
79 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
(no subject)
Sandra Arroyo-vargas <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 5:24 PM To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34- acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories.
The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
Sandra Arroyo
80 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
DEIR Port of Hueneme- Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility Yesenia Ponce <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 6:00 PM To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34-acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories. The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents
This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
[Yesenia Ponce]
Sent from my iPhone
81 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
DEIR Port of Hueneme- Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility Jasmine Martinez <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 6:30 PM To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34-acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories. The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents
This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
Jasmine
Sent from my iPhone
82 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
GLOVIS
Lucas Grandcolas <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 6:37 PM To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34- acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories.
The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
Lucas Grandcolas
Sent from my iPhone
83 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Parking lot for incoming cars off of Hueneme Road
Linda Daly-Calderon <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 7:00 PM Reply-To: Linda Daly-Calderon <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Dear Sir:
I fail to see how the hired "consultants" have taken the Ormond Beach Restoration Plan and a future developed world class Wetlands Sanctuary into their very faulty conclusions at all. This area close by is already home to over 150 bird species. To say that having a lot with nearly 5,000 cars parked on it, big bright lights at night and the accompany noise and pollution would not affect this area adversely is just plain false.
Oxnard so often goes after the immediate dollars and does not have a world (or even local) view of what we can be. We have a gem here, a tourist attraction now and even more so in the future. Why does the City want to throw that away with this "project"? When will we believe in our City and stop being so limiting? We have a history, sad to say, of allowing some really good things to go by the wayside and then other cities pick them up and even improve upon them. One example that comes to mind is the Gull's Children's Museum (now Camarillo has one), another is the Carnegie Library being closed (that was too premature and why can it not be reopened now?). There are others on the list, but let us learn from that and not allow this to happen also to Ormond Beach Wetlands. Let us keep what may be the last wonderful area for the benefit of our present local generation as well as future generations here and even from all over the world. Let us not be short-sighted. I, and many others, am against this project which the Port desires to foist on us.
I have lived in Oxnard for 45+ years now and am still waiting for something great as Ormond Beach is, and can be even more when fully developed, to put us on the map in a positive way.
Sincerely,
Linda Calderon
PO Box 2732
Oxnard, CA 93034
Linda Gray Calderon
84 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Fwd: Comment on Draft EIR for Port of Hueneme temporary parking lot Ron Whitehurst <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 7:06 PM To: [email protected]
Dear Mr. Dobrowakski,
We commend the Port for GHG emissions reductions projects that have earned the following recognitions:
GREEN MARINE CERTIFIED 2017 & 2018 First port in California COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AWARD 2018 American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA) Comprehensive Environmental Program Category
GREENEST US PORT 2017 Green US Shipping Summit
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP AWARD 2017 Ventura County Board of Supervisors The Maker Space to encourage local start-up businesses
Having studied the reports of air monitoring data from the equipment at Haycox Elementary, it is our understanding that the EIR is correct in finding no significant negative impact on air quality. In fact, the study shows that when there are higher pollutants in South Oxnard and near the Port, it is when the wind blows from the north carrying the air pollution from Hwy 101. It appears incorrect to blame the Port as a significant source of air pollution in the community.
It is also our understanding that the only alternatives to the proposed project risk creating more air pollution during the proposed temporary development of parking on its property. We would love to see the community united in support of the Port in grant applications, so it would have more chances of obtaining grants to do a thorough climate and air pollution management plan and support to purchase more emissions reduction equipment.
We hope the South Oxnard community can work closely with the Port on win-win projects that result in increasingly clean air during this developmental phase and the ability to acquire and development the property as a park for the community in the coming years.
We encourage the Port to pursue other economic development projects for the community, such as expanding the 'maker space' and development of green jobs associated with kelp and worm farming.
Sincerely,
Ron Whitehurst
350 Ventura County Climate Hub
108 Orchard Dr,
Ventura, CA 93001
805-746-5365 cell
--
Ron Whitehurst, Pest Control Advisor
Rincon-Vitova Insectaries
800-248-2847
rinconvitova.com
Contact: Email [email protected] [email protected], Phone Office 805-643-5407 Mobile 805-746-5368
Twitter Ron Whitehurst @BugfarmerRon, Rincon-Vitova Insectaries @BugFarmRincon Instagram @ronwhitehurst
Skype: ronwhitehurst
WeChat: Bug-Farmer
WhatsApp 805-746-5368
Facebook Ron Whitehurst, Rincon-Vitova Insectaries
Websites: rinconvitova.com, dietrickinstitute.org, dietrick.org, nzitrap.us Blogs: www.bugfarm.us
www.Biocontrolproducts.com
www.conversationswithdeke.wordpress.com
www.biocontrolbeat.wordpress.com
85 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Glovis 34-acre DEIR
Erica Helson <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 7:57 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34- acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories.
The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
Erica
--
Erica Helson
86 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
DEIR Port of Hueneme- Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility Mac Duncan <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 8:59 PM To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34-acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories. The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents
This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
[Insert n
Sent from my iPhone
87 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
DEIR Port of Hueneme- Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility Mac Duncan <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 9:01 PM To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34-acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories. The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents
This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
Mary Duncan
Los Alamos, CA
Sent from my iPhone
88 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
DEIR Port of Hueneme- Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility Liz Segura <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 9:54 PM To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34-acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories. The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents
This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth Segura
89 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
EIR - Port of Hueneme - Project 34
Coastal Keepers <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:55 PM To: [email protected]
Cc: "Zaragoza, John" <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], "Basua, Gabriela" <[email protected]>, [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
We are writing to submit our comments on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR).
We believe it is going to happen. What we don’t know is what is going to happen after project 34 completes its stay. What we don't know is how this project will direct us to a zero emission port.
To be honest we love seeing our Oxnard harbor district pioneer their way into becoming a top tier zero emission port. We appreciate their commitment to the community and providing an EIR. They have leveraged their resources to create opportunities for professional development, sponsorships, and communal events.
We are all about the views here in the west coast, and we believe project 34 will be a cleaner view than we have now. This treasured land, the 34 acres, is divided among Hueneme road, a railway, new Indy, and Pantojas trucking. If we look at it together, it is a beautiful meadow filled with trash debris with our beloved Halaco superfund site in the background (literally blocking ocean views). It is expected the Port of Hueneme will be maintaining the area, using the proper gravel, and bringing in native plant species. It is also expected that the EIR carefully considers the impact it’ll have on wildlife. Cheers to everyone that took the time to read through it.
Lastly, we expect the community outreach team to expand. With the amount of income and profit generated from this project, we believe there is opportunity for the Port to grow with the local community. We have seen the outreach team being greatly beneficial for the community for the past several years. Yet outreach for project 34 seemed under the radar, considering the unlimited amount of flyers that were distributed and their social media videos that directed us to become on the EIR. We would like to see more of our Port involved in the community through educational workshops, and ORMOND BEACH RESTORATION PROJECT.
Project 34 is going to happen. The real question is what’s next? What is going to be the next major win for the community of Southwinds, South Oxnard, and Port Hueneme? How will the city of Oxnard leverage their resources to create a more sustainable and natural environment? Thank you,
Coastal Keepers
Keeping the 805 coast clean, beautiful & rad to reflect the community, environment & ecosystem 90 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Public Comment: DEIR
Adriana Sanchez <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:23 PM To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34- acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories.
The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
Adriana Sanchez
91 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
DEIR
Valerie Lavenza <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 7:05 AM To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34-acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, lowincome housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories. The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents
This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Oxnard is a city of families. These families deserve transparency and safety. Please remember that you serve these families and not other financial interests. Please show these families the proper care they deserve.
Sincerely,
Valerie
Oxnard Resident
92 93
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Letter of Support
Javier Gomez <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 7:22 AM To: [email protected]
Good Morning Jay,
I inadvertently sent it to the wrong person. Attached is my letter of support to the Port.
I hope it helps.
Respectfully,
Javier Gomez
Retired Educator,
Artistic Director of the Inlakech Cultural Arts Center
EPA-Port Of Hueneme Letter Support .pdf
173K
94 A non-profit
charitable organization
(F.I.D. #95-3400-870)
February 15, 2022
Dear California Air Resource Board Members,
As a long standing resident in the City of Oxnard since 1965 I am adding my support to the Advanced Clean Truck Rule which will enhance the environmental efficiency of the logistical supply chain and help improve air quality in the port and to adjacent communities, especially in south Oxnard. Funding and resources are needed and they must be made available to South Oxnard as they are so done in the Bay Area and at The Port of San Pedro.
As a fifty five-year resident, and as a retired educator for the Oxnard School District I support The Port of Hueneme and its green initiatives which include an investment in EPA grade air quality monitors for South Oxnard. I support the Port of Hueneme's expansion as it is the only agency that is directing its resources to improve the air quality for the residents of the area. Moving the At Berth Requirements date from 2024 to 2025 will give The Port of Hueneme an opportunity to recover from the global pandemic driven depression so it can raise the necessary capital to provide the emissions reduction technology and infrastructure needed for compliance. As a long time resident of Oxnard I have seen the major economic impact The Port of Hueneme has had on families that depend on it for their survival. I respectfully submit this letter of support to your Board. Our local Port is a key partner in our community, especially during this pandemic crisis. The Port of Hueneme and all its local community partners like Feeding the Frontline have distributed over 250,000 lbs. of produce and other products to help feed our essential local farm working community during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The Port of Hueneme has always been a key driving force of economic vitality in helping our community have hope. I respectfully join other community organizations and leader in submitting these comments for your consideration.
Respectfully,
Javier Gomez, Artistic Director/Founder
Inlakech Cultural Arts Center
632 W. Guava Street
Oxnard Ca 93033
[email protected]
1 INLAKECH CULTURAL ARTS CENTER/LUCHA INC.
Mailing Address: 632 W. Guava Street
(Site Address: 250 E. Fifth Street)
Oxnard, California 93033
(805) 890-2193 Email: [email protected]
95 A non-profit charitable organization
(F.I.D. #95-3400-870)
PROPOSAL
Abstract
The Inlakech Cultural Arts Center/Lucha Inc. has been providing the youth and elderly of Oxnard an opportunity to develop and showcase their artistic talents for over 49 years. Thousands of youth have benefited from the Cultural Center. The Center is supported through volunteerism, donations and, on occasion, modest grants.
Background and Community Contribution
The Inlakech Cultural Arts Center, under the leadership of founding artistic director Javier Gomez, has provided thousands of youth in the Oxnard area with an experience and an opportunity that is not available to them in the mainstream. The Center is staffed with volunteers and has survived operationally with donations and occasionally through modest grants. There is no charge to the youth who, for the most part, emanate from low income backgrounds. It was the vision of Javier Gomez and supporters of the Center that youth, regardless of their inability to pay, would have open access to the wonderful world of art, music, dance and theatre. It was the intent of the center to provide a positive after-school alternate experiences. Historically, the Center fills a vital role in developing the artistic talents; of both youth and the elderly. (It serves as one of the most successful youth diversion programs in the city.) Offering cultural lessons daily and year round every Monday to Friday; from 4 pm to 8 pm.
Mission Statement
To enhance the cultural self-esteem of the Latino/a community by providing youth and the elderly an opportunity to realize their artistic potential through a rich cultural educational, enrichment literacy program; focused on, the visual and performing arts.
Goals to support our Mission
1. Providing a safe and supportive after-school environment where youth can meet to develop an appreciation of the performing fine arts where they can experience, develop and harness their artistic talents.
2. Providing a facility where youth can meet to study, rehearse, and develop their artistic interests.
3. Providing a Free after-school program that allows youth to heal through the arts by participating in a highly constructive and positive learning environment.
4. Providing youth with mentoring information, and support; by encouraging them to go beyond high school in pursuit of a university education.
5. Providing youth with an opportunity to showcase their full leadership potential, artistically; in civic and social events.
6. Providing the City of Oxnard with a positive, artistic enrichment literacy program that enhances the cultural self-esteem of citizens.
2 INLAKECH CULTURAL
ARTS CENTER/LUCHA INC.
Mailing Address: 632 W. Guava Street
(Site Address: 250 E. Fifth Street)
Oxnard, California 93033
(805) 890-2193 Email: [email protected]
96 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
DEIR Port of Hueneme- Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility Saraisabel Virgen <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 11:26 AM To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34-acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories. The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents
This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
Saraisabel Virgen
97 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
DEIR Port of Hueneme- Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility Diane Pina <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 1:08 PM To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review.
A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents. The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR. The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34-acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter. South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories. The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites. The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
D. Pina
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
98 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
(no subject)
Michael Landeros <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 6:23 PM To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34- acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories.
The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
Michael Landeros
99 Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
DEIR Port of Hueneme- Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility Fatima Munoz <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 6:13 PM To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34-acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories. The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents
This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
Fatima Munoz
100
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Oxnard Pallet Co. Support
[email protected] <[email protected]> Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 3:19 PM To: [email protected]
Cc: Vannessa Vasquez Doto <[email protected]> Dear Mr. Dobrowalski:
The Port of Hueneme has a strong commitment to the community and creates economic opportunities, while pursuing full decarbonization and environmental sustainability and equity.
We fully support the Port in the Special Use Permit for a temporary outdoor vehicle facility and believe they have taken all steps necessary to be good environmental stewards to our area.
They need this permit in order to keep up with the highly competitive and larger global economic trends of the auto shipping logistics market. This benefits our community in many ways.
The Port has been open, responsible, and transparent in their permit application process for the 34 acres Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Lot and we believe you should approve the permit.
Thank You.
Sincerely,
Everyone here at Oxnard Pallet Company
Michael L. Doto II
Oxnard Pallet Company
Lead Sales Representative
Direct email: [email protected]
PH: 805-487-8458
FX: 805-487-3832
101
102
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Comments Regarding the Port of Hueneme Development of the 34 acre parcel Hueneme Road
Chuck Caulkins <[email protected]> Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 4:49 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: Chuck Caulkins <[email protected]>
Hello Jay,
I am both a tenant of the Port and a concerned citizen of Ventura County with property in the cities of Oxnard and Ventura.
The Port of Hueneme / Oxnard Harbor District (OHD) had spent time and money, conducted out reach and followed the guidelines for the proposed project to the letter.
The complete EIR found this project to be acceptable and viable. This parcel will be beneficial to the Port and its customers competing for limited space on the current Port property. In my opinion the Port of Hueneme has gone above and beyond to ensure this project will be completed with care and respect for the local citizens on Ventura County.
I am fully in favor of the approval of this project and the efforts put forth by the OHD! Lets get this project done for the sake of good stewardship, good neighbors, good business and good paying jobs for the community.
Let’s make cargo move!
Sincerely Yours,
Chuck Caulkins
Port Manager
Del Monte Fresh Produce, N.A., Inc
Dock 1, Berth 3 / PO Box 520
Port Hueneme, CA 93044
Tel: 805-488-0881 X227
Mobile: 805-443-1088
103
104
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
DEIR Proposed Vehicle Storage Facility
Mazzella, Len <[email protected]> Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 1:34 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Hello,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. I am a 25 year citizen of Oxnard with an interest in assuring our community grows in a responsible manner, providing locally sourced jobs (which reduces commute related pollution) and elimination of blight. The parcel proposed in this project has been a long term source of blight and litter withing the community. The Port of Hueneme is committed to clean, responsible, sustainable growth and has well documented its business’ minimal impact to the area’s air quality and its commitment to a zero emission future. This project will beautify a long blighted area and offer a much needed foundation for the health of the ports future sustainability as a source of excellent, locally sourced jobs to the future generations of our community Len Mazzella
2524 Timber Creek Trail
Oxnard
CONFIDENTIALITY, PRIVACY AND DISCLAIMER NOTICE "This message is for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain confidential information. If you are not an intended recipient, you are requested to notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. While the sender has taken reasonable precautions to minimize the risk of viruses, we cannot warrant the absence of, or accept liability for, any such viruses in this message or any attachment. Any processing of personal information will be protected by the Wallenius Wilhelmsen groups’ privacy policy. To read more about personal data processing and your related personal rights, please visit our website. " 105
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
DEIR Port of Hueneme- Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility Daniela Soleri <[email protected]> Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 12:34 PM To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34-acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories. The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents
This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
Daniela Soleri
--
................................
Daniela Soleri, PhD
she | her | ella
Research Scientist
Geography Department
UC Santa Barbara
http://geog.ucsb.edu/~soleri/
New book - FOOD GARDENS FOR A CHANGING WORLD:
Growing food for healthy people, communities and ecosystems Soleri, Cleveland and Smith
2019 CAB International
http://geog.ucsb.edu/~soleri/FGCW_webpage.htm
.................................
106
Steps for justice in California
California Truth and Healing Council correcting the historical record with truth about the state's treatment of Native Californians <https://tribalaffairs.ca.gov/cthc/>
CA Assembly Bill 3121 investigating reparations for California’s descendants of enslaved Africans <https://tinyurl.com/CA-AB-3121> 107
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
monique sonoquie <[email protected]> Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 5:48 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34- acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories.
The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
Monique Sonoquie
108
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Glovis 34 acre DEIR
Yudin Roa <[email protected]> Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 6:27 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34- acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories.
The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
Yudin Z. Roa
109
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
DEIR Port of Hueneme- Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility Christiane Schlumberger <[email protected]> Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 10:49 AM To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34-acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories. The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents
This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
Christiane Schlumberger
110
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
DEIR Port of Hueneme- Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility Sam Stewart <[email protected]> Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 5:16 PM To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski, <BR><BR>I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents. <BR><BR>The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR. <BR><BR>The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34-acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.<BR><BR>Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter. <BR> <BR>South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories. The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents<BR><BR>This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands. <BR><BR>Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites. <BR><BR>The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws. <BR> <BR>Sincerely, <BR>[Insert name]<BR>
111
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Glovis 34-Acre Deir
Sarah Shahbazian <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 6:11 PM To: [email protected]
Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34- acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories.
The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
Sarah Shahbazian
112
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
DEIR Port of Hueneme- Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility Francisco Tapia <[email protected]> Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 10:18 AM To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Jay Dobrowalski,
I’m writing to submit comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the proposed Port of Hueneme Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility. The city did not do everything they could have done to provide meaningful public review. A large percentage of residents who would be most impacted by this project are primarily Spanish speakers but only a 5 page summary was translated to Spanish, out of the 1,000 page report. The DEIR should be translated into Spanish, and possibly other languages to make it more accessible to impacted residents.
The DEIR doesn’t take into account all of the different port expansion projects that this project is linked to which together will lead to much more diesel exhaust and other pollution in our community. This includes the 250 acre Multimodal Logistics Park, which is intended to transition out the 34 acre site, yet it is never mentioned in the DEIR.
The DEIR doesn’t analyze the increased pollution from port traffic on Hueneme Road driving to the 34-acre site. The DEIR should evaluate pollution from all vehicles that are driven every day back and forth from the port to the storage facility for 3-5 years, pollution from the ships that will bring the new cars in, and the diesel trucks and trains that will take the cars out of Oxnard to their final destinations.
Traffic directed to the 34-acre site will be near five elementary schools, one high school, two community parks, low-income housing, and a community health clinic, impacting several thousand young children who are more sensitive to air pollution. The DEIR needs to address the health impacts related to increased diesel emissions and particulate matter.
South Oxnard already faces pollution from the nearby power plant, superfund site, and nearby factories. The DEIR needs to consider environmental justice by assessing the impacts of the project in addition to the current pollution burdens faced by the South Oxnard residents
This project is right between South Oxnard neighborhoods and the Ormond Beach Wetlands which is being restored for a public green space for the community to enjoy and take their families. The DEIR does not look into the increased number of cars on Hueneme Road and the impacts it will have on surrounding neighborhoods trying to safely access the Ormond Beach Wetlands.
Finally, the DEIR doesn’t properly consider all possible alternatives like keeping the port’s traffic away from sensitive areas by using the site as a park instead, using storage space within the naval base or using zero-emission electric trucks to carry its cargo to existing sites.
The city needs to recirculate a new DEIR that addresses these flaws.
Sincerely,
Francisco Tapia
113
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Fwd: Fw: New OBRAP Project Webpage
Mancha,Salvador <[email protected]> Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 10:42 AM To: Jay Dobrowalski <[email protected]>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Irene <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 7:46 AM
Subject: Fw: New OBRAP Project Webpage
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Hello Mr. Sal Mancha,
I’m a life long resident of Oxnard, and care about the City quality of life, currently very disturbing is the Port’s proposal to store cars at Ormond Beach adjacent to the Advance Water Purification Facility.
Please let me know City of Oxnard’s position on this?
Best,
Irene Rauschenberger
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Irene
Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2022 7:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Good Morning,
My mistake sending you a blank message… I’m concerned and will you please let me know the City of Oxnard’s position on the Port of Hueneme’s proposal to park cars at Ormond for storage ? Thank you,
Irene Rauschenberger
Resident
From: Irene
Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2022 7:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Sent from Windows Mail
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 5:55 PM
FriendThe Ormond Beach Partners would like to inform you that the Ormond Beach Restoration and Access Plan (OBRAP) project webpage is now hosted by the City. The dedicated project webpage recently went live and will contain more information in the near future. Currently, the draft Restoration Plan and public comments are posted on the webpage. The webpage will be the home for all future documents, public outreach meetings postings, and all other documents and updates concerning the OBRAP. 114
The webpage can be accessed by the following link: https://www.oxnard.org/ormond-beach-restorationpublic-access-plan/ The Ormond Beach Partners would also like to thank Friends of Ormond Beach for all the volunteer work they have invested at Ormond Beach for the past year. Friends of Ormond Beach have also started a newsletter for the purposes of informing subscribers on all the news and relevant information concerning Ormond Beach. The information identified below was provided by Friends of Ormond Beach to introduce themselves to the OBRAP community. Please feel free to contact Friends of Ormond Beach directly if you would like more information about the organization.
The Ormond Beach Partners would also like to thank all of the countless volunteers and organizations that have contributed to the preservation and conservation of Ormond Beach over the decades. Your hard work and dedication is greatly appreciated.
Friends of Ormond Beach Organization (All information identified below has been provided by Friends of Ormond Beach)
Introduction:
Ormond Beach and Lagoon, located in Oxnard between Port Hueneme and Point Mugu, is a unique wetlands environment that supports over 200 migratory birds, including the endangered Western Snowy Plover and the California Least Tern. Ormond Beach and Lagoon is situated next to the Halaco Superfund Site and has been blighted by decades of industrialization and pollution from homeless encampments.
The Mission of Friends of Ormond Beach:
Friends of Ormond Beach formed in 2019 and is a grassroots organization of environmentally minded volunteers seeking to protect the Ormond Beach wetlands and the species therein. We seek to raise awareness to our local and broader community about the threats to this wetlands area and partner with other environmentalist groups such as Surfrider, Paddle Out Plastic, and the Ventura Audubon Society to mitigate those threats. We also work with both city and county agencies that oversee the waterways that discharge into the Ormond Lagoon. Finally, we support the three partners of Ormond Beach, the city of Oxnard, the State Coastal Conservancy, and The Nature Conservancy in finding a proper land manager to protect the wetlands environment from further degradation. We welcome new volunteers.
You can contact us and sign up to get our monthly newsletter at saveormondbeach2 [email protected]. Follow us on Facebook at friendsoformondbeach and on Instagram@ friendsoformondbeach.
--
Isidro Figueroa
Principal Planner
805-385-8207
Please visit us online: oxnard.org/planning
For Answers to Frequently Asked Questions visit our FAQ page COVID 19 NOTICE:
In response
to state and federal directives,
OUR COUNTER IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE.
Planning permit entitlement processing services will continue.
General inquiries should be sent via email to
[email protected].
115
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Fwd: The "Your port is here to work for you, join us" is an enigma...
Mancha,Salvador <[email protected]> Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:34 PM To: Jay Dobrowalski <[email protected]>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Irene <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:00 PM
Subject: Fw: The "Your port is here to work for you, join us" is an enigma...
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> PS, Today’s Star News OPINION pg.13A, “Public Health needs investment … is preventative health, etc.” Noteworthy, Ormond Beach is a natural resource and an investment for Public Health, that residents have been advocating for decades!
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Irene
Sent: Saturday, March 5, 2022 11:23 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], Steven Nash, Aaron Greer To: City of Oxnard Commissioners,
Here we go again, VC Star article Feb 19, 2019, “Port eyes land to store 5,000 cars” … . Then again VC Star
article Feb 20, 2022, “Your Port is here to work for you, join us”.
The Port proposal for “5k vehicle storage” permit at the corner of Hueneme and Perkins road 34 acres adjacent to the Advanced Waste Water Purification Facility is not compatible with AWWPF industry, nor supportive of the adjacent community.
Vehicle storage movement and emissions is a threat to the coastal environment that supports wetlands and wildlife, and for the community preservation projects with the Nature Conservancy and the Coastal Commission restoration plans at Ormond Beach Wetlands. Noteworthy, Naval Base at Pt. Mugu, currently the second largest wetlands area in California and is designated as a protected area, no other agency is acting to protect it ! The Ormond Beach area hosts over 200 migratory bird species and more shorebird species are known to use Ormond Beach than any other site in Ventura County. Cite CA.GOV
A challenge, is the existing Superfund Site at Ormond Beach since 1965, is an enigma on our coastline…that may someday contaminate the ocean and impact the Channel Islands. https://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0901242 A remedy is Oxnard needs to acquire the AWPF adjacent 34 ac vacant lot, so to not acquiesce to the demands for a “temporary vehicle storage” at Ormond!. The City of Oxnard is fortunate to have the Port and Hueneme Base here, economically and for security, nonetheless the Port has options for vehicle storage adjacent to existing industrial parking just south of Ormond Beach.
116
Noteworthy, historically Native Americans lived in the area and made use of the wetlands and lagoon, most notably the Chumash people, up until the early 1800s. Includes the Channel Islands history.
Oxnard needs to tell this story!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ormond_Beach,_Oxnard,_California “In other words, as Henry David Thoreau claims, a remedy we can never have enough of is a healthy dose of nature”.
Best for Oxnard,
Irene Rauschenberger
Resident
Sent from Windows Mail
--
Salvador Mancha
Department Administration Technician
Community Development Department
214 S C Street | Oxnard, CA 93030
805-385-7884
www.oxnard.org/development
117
For
new applications,
aside from Cannabis related permits, email us at [email protected].
Large projects can be shipped with prior authorization. Smaller projects may be submitted via email.
For
new Cannabis applications, call (805) 385-7863 for cannabis zoning clearance/verification and appointments.
Otherwise, visit https://www.oxnard.org/cannabis-regulations/ or email [email protected]
The application window has been extended to May 22, 2020.
For
existing applications, contact your assigned Case Planner by direct email.
Please check our website at
www.Oxnard.org
and City approved information on COVID19 for
updates.
--
Salvador Mancha
Department Administration Technician
Community Development Department
214 S C Street | Oxnard, CA 93030
805-385-7884
www.oxnard.org/development
118
Dobrowalski, Jay <[email protected]>
Fwd: The "Your port is here to work for you, join us" is an enigma...
Mancha,Salvador <[email protected]> Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:35 PM To: Jay Dobrowalski <[email protected]>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Irene <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:34 PM
Subject: Fw: The "Your port is here to work for you, join us" is an enigma...
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> One more FYI : It’s 2022 - 1983 = 39 years ago!
Efforts to save Ormond began…In 1983 the Ormond Beach Observers was founded by Jean Harris and Roma Armbrust, advocates for the environment, and unified diverse organizations interested in protecting these wetlands. They were also instrumental in Oxnard beach become a State beach.
Best,
Irene
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
119
July 1, 2022
Via Email and Federal Express
Jay Dobrowalski
Senior Planner
City of Oxnard Planning Division
214 South C Street
Oxnard, CA 93030
Email: [email protected]
Re: Supplemental Comments on The Port of Hueneme – Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility Project (#2020069039) and PZ 18-500-02 (Special Use Permit) Dear Mr. Dobrowalski:
We write on behalf of the Central Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy (“CAUSE”), Earthjustice, Natural Resources Defense Council (“NRDC”), and Wishtoyo Chumash Foundation (“Wishtoyo”) to provide supplemental comments for the Port of Hueneme – Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage Facility Project (“Project”).
On March 21, 2022, the City of Oxnard Planning Division (“OPD”) hosted a Virtual Community Workshop with presentations from the OHD discussing its plans for the 34-acre Vehicle Storage Site currently under review. At the conclusion of the Virtual Community Workshop, OPD invited additional written comments from the public concerning the proposed Project and the presentation by the Oxnard Harbor District (“OHD” or the “Port”). In line with this invitation, these comments supplement our previous letter submitted on February 14, 2022. We incorporate by reference all previous comments submitted raising issues regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Report (“DEIR”) and reiterate our position that the DEIR is inadequate and cannot support the Special Use Permit sought through the relevant application to the Planning Commission.
In our prior letter, we explained how the DEIR for the Project failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). There is new evidence that has emerged under production in response to Public Records Act (“PRA”) requests to the Port that should be part of the record such that decisionmakers and the public have all substantial relevant information to participate in the CEQA process and make an informed decision on the project, as required by CEQA.1 The 1 Cal. Code Regs. tit. 14, § 15151 (1992) (“An EIR should be prepared with a sufficient degree of analysis to provide decisionmakers with information which enables them to make a decision which intelligently takes account of environmental consequences”); Laurel Heights Improvement Ass’n v. Regents of Univ. of California 47 Cal. 3d 367, 394 (1988), as modified in denial of reh’g (Jan. 26, 1989)(“A fundamental purpose of an EIR is to provide decision makers with information they can use in deciding whether to approve a proposed project… If post-approval environmental review were allowed, EIR’s would likely become nothing more than post hoc 120
released documents substantiate the serious CEQA violations described in our February 14 letter:
in compiling the DEIR, the Port knowingly piecemealed other expansion projects, willfully ignored significant environmental issues and did not include adequate detail in the DEIR, and failed to translate the DEIR for meaningful public review.
Furthermore, we are concerned that the City of Oxnard is withholding additional relevant information due to their egregious delay in responding to our PRA request from June 2021 and their failure to meet with requestors to identify responsive records. We ask, once again, that the City set up a meeting with requestors as soon as possible to develop a path forward to producing records responsive to our June 2021 request.
Simply put, the current DEIR is inadequate. Given the significant flaws described further below, the DEIR should be rejected, and the special use permit must be denied. If the City wishes to move forward, it must recirculate a DEIR that contains sufficient information and detail to allow decision makers to make an informed decision on the entire Project, as required by CEQA. Should the City fail to conduct a full, thorough, and transparent environmental analysis in compliance with CEQA, the Planning Commission must decline to certify any final EIR. rationalizations to support action already taken”); Sierra Club v. County of Fresno, 6 Cal. 5th 502, 510, 431 P.3d 1151, 1158 (2018) (holding that an EIR must include “sufficient detail to enable those who did not participate in its preparation to understand and to consider meaningfully the issues the proposed project raises…”). 121
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND................................................................................................. 4 I. The DEIR Improperly Piecemealed the Project..................................................................... 4 II. The DEIR’s Project Description is Inaccurate and Misleading............................................. 9 The City has not Demonstrated how the Project is Temporary in the DEIR. ................ 9 The City has not Explained the Permanence of the Alleged Benefits of the Project. .. 10 III. The DEIR Failed to Incorporate Critical Environmental Information in Violation of CEQA. ................................................................................................................................. 11 The DEIR Failed to Incorporate an Accurate Cumulative Impact Assessment. .......... 11 The Traffic Study Incorporated into the DEIR was Rubberstamped. .......................... 13 The Port Failed to Provide a Reasonable Explanation for not Considering a ZeroEmission Vehicle Alternative....................................................................................... 15 IV. The Port has not Provided a Meaningful Public Review of the DEIR. ............................... 16 CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................. 17 122
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Given the lack of publicly available information on expansion planned by the Port, CAUSE and NRDC submitted Public Records Act (“PRA”) requests to both the City and the Port in June 2021.
The City has almost entirely ignored the aforementioned PRA requests and has produced only 20 documents to date, despite the statutory and constitutional right under California law to public access to governmental records.2 This failure by the City to fully respond to our request not only violates the PRA, but also undermines a core principle of CEQA: public participation.
Since we submitted comments on the Draft EIR in February 2022, the Port produced additional documents responsive to the PRA requests on February 22, March 18, April 22, April 29, and May 26, 2022, and continues to make documents available on a rolling basis. The produced documents provided additional information previously unavailable to commenters regarding the 34-acre site, the permanent 250-acre site, and other reasonably foreseeable development in the Port. Based on our review of these new documents, commenters have the right to supplement our earlier comments.3 Since this supplemental letter is based on new information revealed in the Port’s responses to our PRA Requests, the comments raised herein and the attached produced documents should become part of the administrative record.
CEQA requires agencies to recirculate an EIR when “significant new information” is disclosed and provide an opportunity for a renewed public notice and comment.4 “Significant new information” includes documents that reveal that “the draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment were precluded.”5
As detailed below, the documents produced by the Port under the PRA reveal precisely how the DEIR was inadequate: (1) the DEIR improperly piecemealed the Project; (2) the DEIR’s Project Description is inaccurate and misleading; (3) the DEIR failed to incorporate critical environmental information in violation of CEQA; and (4) the City has not provided a meaningful public review of the DEIR.
I. The DEIR Improperly Piecemealed the Project.
The DEIR failed to consider the 250-acre site as a reasonably foreseeable extension and therefore improperly piecemealed the Project. CEQA prohibits the piecemealing of projects to avoid a more robust review of the potential direct or indirect physical changes to the environment caused by a 2 See Cal. Gov. Code §§ 6253(b), 6253.1(a).
3 Cal. Gov. Code § 65009(b); Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21177(a); Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. Bakersfield 124 Cal. App. 4th 1184, 1199-1203, 22 Cal. Rptr. 3d 203, 214 (2004); see Galante Vineyards v. Monterey Peninsula Water Mgmt. Dist. 60 Cal. App. 4th 1109, 1121, 71 Cal.
Rptr. 2d 1, 8 (1997).
4 Cal. Code Regs., tit.14, § 15088.5(d), (f); see also Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21092.1 (West). 5 Cal. Code Regs., tit.14, § 15088.5(a)(4).
123
project.6 An EIR must include an analysis of the environmental effects of future expansions or other actions when: a) a project is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the initial project; and b) the future expansion or action is significant in that it will likely change the scope or nature of the initial project or its environmental effects.7
The Port produced “significant new information” which revealed that the DEIR “was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature” with respect to the 250-acre site that meaningful public review was precluded—thus triggering the need for recirculation as stated in the CEQA Guidelines § 15088.5(a)(4). The record indicates that the 34-acre site is an allegedly temporary measure with the Port already discussing future action plans to move the site to the 250- acre lot; and the Port and the City are contemplating multiple projects with a singular goal: to reduce capacity constraints for vehicle storage. Because these documents reveal serious gaps in the DEIR, they must not only be made part of the record, but the agency must also revise and recirculate the DEIR giving full consideration to the 250-acre site.
The Port has repeatedly emphasized, in different contexts, that the 250-acre site would operate as a logical outgrowth, i.e., a reasonably foreseeable consequence, of the 34-acre site and that it would be a permanent structure with a larger environmental footprint. For instance, the Port has started drafting conceptual plans, pursuing financial arrangements with customers, considering the 250- acre project for grants, and designating the site as an Opportunity Zone. More egregiously, records indicate that the Port might have commenced the CEQA process for the 250-acre project as early as 2018. As such, this new evidence further demonstrates that the 250-acre site meets the CEQA test for a future project that must be considered in an EIR for the 34-acre site.8 In addition to the evidence and comments already raised in our February 14, 2022 letter, recent PRA productions further show that the 250-acre project is intended as a reasonable future consequence of the 34-acre site and that concrete steps have been taken to bring the project into fruition. The subsequent paragraphs detail a chronology of the Port’s various grant applications, meetings with landowners, communications with potential tenants and clients, and Community Workshop meetings with stakeholders, which together demonstrate that the Port has known for many years, and at least since 2019, that the 250-acre site would be a reasonably foreseeable consequence of 34-acre site.9
In August 2019, the Port began working with the 16 owners to get a non-binding commitment that the 250-acre property would be designated as an opportunity zone.10 As early as November 2019, 6 Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay Comm. v. Bd. Of Port Comm’rs, 91 Cal.App. 4th 1344, 1358, 111 Cal. Rptr. 2d 598, 608 (2001), as modified on denial of reh'g (Sept. 26, 2001). 7 Laurel Heights Improvement Ass’n v. Regents of Univ. of California 47 Cal. 3d 367, 396, 764 P.2d 278 (1988), as modified on denial of reh’g (Jan. 26, 1989). 8 Id. 9 Aegir Property Advisors, Project Update on Proposed Port of Hueneme Logistics Park at p. 9 (Feb. 2021) (this presentation highlights a timeline wherein the CEQA process for the 250-acre site started in 2018).
10 See Email from Kristin Decas to Commissioners, Subject: Weekly Update (Aug. 5, 2019). 124
GLOVIS had already committed to 140 acres of the 250 site.11 In these conversations, contacts at GLOVIS discussed Letters of Intent for the 250-acre and 34-acre sites together.12 Emails from Port customers indicate that they viewed the 250-acre project, 34-acre project, and the STACKED parking structure as reaching the same goal of expanding port vehicle capacity.13 Thereafter in February 2020, OHD and GLOVIS began discussing arrangements for an MOU for the use of the 250-acre site as a long-term project. These email communications also reflect GLOVIS’ interest in an on-dock parking structure and additional properties for use. More critically, it flags a 10-acre storage site at 6001 Arcturus, which has to go through renovations to be able to land cars.14
In March 2020, the Port signed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with the property owners for the 250-acre site.15 The MOU says that the Port and the landowners will cooperate in drafting and considering a purchase option for the 250-acre site.16 The MOU lists the following property owners:
• William Ito, Ito Farms
• Allen Camp, South Shore Land Company LLC
• Steven Murata, Plum Vista LP / Ume Properties LLC
• Ito Family Trust
• White Family Trust
• Katsuda trust(s)
The newly produced documents by the Port indicate that they were in conversation with landowners, including Allen Camp and Bill Ito, in 2020.17 Beginning in June 2020, multiple budget documents list the 34-acre site and the 250-acre site as a single line item, e.g., “34 Acre/250 Acre Project,” suggesting that the projects are inextricably 11 See Email from Dona T. Lacayo to GLOVIS USA at p.2 (Feb. 8, 2021). 12 See Email between Dona T. Lacayo and GLOVIS USA (Nov. 7, 2019), Email between Dona T. Lacayo and GLOVIS USA (Aug. 20, 2019), Email between Dona T. Lacayo and GLOVIS USA (Sept. 2019).
13 Id.
14 Email from Dona T. Lacayo to Charles Franklin Re GLOVIS real estate update at p. 2 (Feb. 21, 2020).
15 Memorandum of Understanding, Oxnard Harbor District (March 3, 2020). 16 Id. at p. 2.
17 See Email from Kristin Decas to Commissioners, Subject: Weekly Update (Oct. 16, 2020); Email from Sandra Cruz to Kristin Decas, Subject: End of Day Review (Dec. 2, 2020). 125
linked.18 In October 2020, the Port continued meeting with the negotiating team for the owners to determine an accurate market value for the site.19
From late 2020 to early 2021, GLOVIS and OHD continued correspondence about coordination for port vehicle storage expansion that tied the 250-acre site with an on-dock parking structure, the 34-acre site, and Naval base property.20 In early 2021, OHD noted in a presentation that it has already invested $230,000 in developing the 250-acre site, including: development structure analysis; extensive analysis on CEQA, real estate, park development, engineering, rail; and discussions with City/County officials.21 The same presentation also highlighted that OHD needed “firm commitments” and “fast track permitting” for the 250-acre project and the “stop gap measure”—referring to the 34-Acre site.22
At the same time, the Port re-applied for federal funding for the 250-acre project and successfully designated the 250-acre site in census tracks as an Opportunity Zone.23 Beginning in February 2021, OHD started to line up potential customersfor the 250-acre site and began securing MOUs.24 In an email, subject line: ”250 Acres Development Update Call to Action,” the Port noted that “in discussions with several potential port clients, we have identified potential demand from them for approximately 160 acres.”25 Although this estimate did not translate to firm commitments, the Port noted that they could not accommodate more than three to four tenants, one of which would be the Port itself. Thereafter in May, the Port sent a draft MOU with an expected deadline of “July 2nd, 2021.”26 The Draft MOU provides that Port customers will put down a deposit ($12,000 per acre) to use land on the 250-acre site, with the deposit being refundable until the Port secures legal entitlements to the 250-acre site.27 An April 2021 Board Meeting also notes that the Port has engaged in “advanced discussions with auto customers on the 250 acres site.”28 Thereafter, in June, the emails noted that there was a “strong indication from WWL, Del Monte and GLOVIS that they 18 The Port of Hueneme Oxnard Harbor District, Fiscal Year 2021 Budget Schedule at pp. 3-4 (2021); The Port of Hueneme Oxnard Harbor District, FY 2022 Capital Outlay Plan (2021); The Port of Hueneme, FY2021/2022 Preliminary Budget Presentation at p. 17 (May 17, 2021); The Port of Hueneme Oxnard Harbor District, FY 2021 Capital Outlay Plan Draft (2020). 19 See Email from Kristin Decas to Commissioners, Subject Weekly Update (Oct. 16, 2020). 20 See Email from Dona T. Lacayo to Charles Franklin Re: GLOVIS real estate update (Feb. 21, 2020).
21 Aegir Property Advisors, Project Update on Proposed Port of Hueneme Logistics Park at p. 5 (February 2021).
22 Id at p. 6.
23 See OHD, Collaboration Call with City of Oxnard at p.2 (Ongoing). 24 See Email from Dona T. Lacayo to Port of Hueneme Staff and Aegir Ports at pp. 4-6 (June 2021).
25 Id. at p. 5.
26 Id. at p. 2.
27 Memorandum of Understanding for Deposit and Right to Lease Land in a Proposed Port Related Logistics Park in the City of Oxnard (Form as of May 11, 2021). 28 Board of Harbor Commissioners, Board Meeting Materials at p. 14 (Apr. 19, 2021). 126
are in” and an update indicating the amount of space each customer wants to be reserved via the MOU “40-50 acres for Del Monte, 100 for WWL.”29
In September 2021, the OHD received an Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (“INFRA”)-Extra grant for the Hueneme Modernization Project.30 The INFRA-Extra initiative provides an opportunity to apply for Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (“TIFIA”) credit assistance for up to 49% of eligible project costs. The 2021 request for the INFRA grants states, “[t]he Project advances a critical component of the 2020 Plan that calls for … increased auto capacity.”31 The application goes on to state that the “[m]odernization Project [would] increase the Port’s ability to accommodate automobile exports” and that the “Port’s automobile customers have high demand for additional space to accommodate their cargo.”32 Most recently, during the March 2022 virtual Community Workshop, Oxnard Planning Division officials and OHD officials stated that the 34-acre site and the 250-acre site would operate “like Legos.”33 That is, the 250-acre site would build off of the “stop-gap” 34-acre site. The Port had already recognized the link between a more permanent solution to their capacity issues and a stopgap measure for their clients’ space constraints.
Finally, the City of Oxnard was also aware of the Port’s plans for the 250-acre site. For example, the Port produced a document titled “Collaboration Call with City of Oxnard” with the goal of “Partnership for Economic Development.”34 The document has an “ongoing deadline” and is supplemented with information about the 250-acre site, including grant applications and the inclusion of the 250-acre site in census tracks as an Opportunity Zone.35 Furthermore, a flyer published by both the City of Oxnard and the Port indicates that “[t]he stop gap 34-acre measure … will ensure that the City of Oxnard and the PoH will have sufficient time to structure and meet all regulatory requirements for the longer term 250-acre port logistics park with access to rail.”36 As all the above information demonstrates, it was reasonably foreseeable that the 250-acre site would be a necessary component of this Project. Separating the 250-acre site as a “separate and 29 Email between Dona T. Lacayo and Port of Hueneme Staff and Aegir Ports at p. 1 (June 2021).
30 The Port of Hueneme, Port of Hueneme Projects & Events (March 2019). 31 The Port of Hueneme, The Hueneme Modernization Project – Dep’t of Transportation – INFRA Grant Application FY 2021 at p. 6.
32 Id. 33 City of Oxnard, Community Workshop-34 Acre Vehicle Storage Facility Project available online at https://oxnardca.civicclerk.com/web/player.aspx?id=4561 at 2:57:19 (Mar. 21, 2022). 34 OHD, Collaboration Call with City of Oxnard at p. 2 (Ongoing). 35 Id. Private investments made within this zone will expect return on their investment over a period of time. This strongly suggests that an increased movement of cars and other goods through this corridor was reasonably foreseeable.
36 City of Oxnard & The Port of Hueneme: Partners in Economic Development, Flyer Re:
Ensuring the commercial viability of a major Ventura County Economic Engine - The Port of Hueneme (PoH) - for a better tomorrow at the City of Oxnard. 127
distinct” project in the EIR is not only piecemealing in violation of CEQA but also entirely disingenuous.
II. The DEIR’s Project Description is Inaccurate and Misleading.
OHD staff have repeatedly emphasized the temporary nature of the Project to downplay the project’s impacts. The Port also noted that the 34-acre project could be taken apart to make another future possible. Yet, when stakeholders asked the Port about a) where the Port would store the 5,000 cars after the 3-5 years; and b) whether workers will be laid off after 3-5 years – the Port evaded answering major questions about the expiration of the temporary permit.37 The Project description in the DEIR also suffers from these fatal flaws. The Port produced “significant new information” revealing that the DEIR was “fundamentally and basically inadequate” for two key reasons. First, neither the City nor the Port explains why the Project is truly temporary. Second, assuming the Project is temporary, neither the City nor the Port explains why the benefits of the Project would be permanent. For these reasons, the new documents must not only be made part of the record, but they also demonstrate how the project description is inadequate under CEQA, and the agency must revise and recirculate the Draft EIR with a proper project description so that decisionmakers can properly assess the impacts of this project.
The City has not Demonstrated how the Project is Temporary in the DEIR.
Although OPD and OHD officials have repeatedly stated that the project would be “temporary,” the documents produced by the Port in response to our PRA requests have demonstrated that the project is likely to become permanent.
The Port has repeatedly raised concerns about an unsustainable “serious off port land deficit” of about 300 acres. More recently, the Port has noted that “storage is becoming an issue now not just for automobiles but containers now as well.”38 While the City has highlighted these space issues, it has not provided the public with any information that would buttress the alleged temporary nature of the site. For example, OHD has not provided specifics regarding plans to transition the site post-project (e.g., into a park) or that the Port will undertake specific mitigation measures to prevent the environmental impact of that reversion. Instead, the space issues that the Port has repeatedly raised in internal documents lead us to believe that the site will be used to increase the carrying capacity of the Port. The lack of transparency on these points calls into question the temporary nature of the site as well as OHD’s long-term intentions for the site.
We reiterate that the temporary nature of the project does not align with the objectives outlined for the project, i.e., to “reduce and consolidate” reliance on off-port satellite storage locations. Unless existing off-Port sites are being kept in operation or an additional more permanent site is planned 37 City of Oxnard, Community Workshop-34 Acre Vehicle Storage Facility Project available online at https://oxnardca.civicclerk.com/web/player.aspx?id=4561 (Mar. 21, 2022) (questions regarding future of cars at 1:48:55 and temporary employment at 1:30:26 and 1:53:10. Vague answers from the Port beginning at 2:43 -3:00)
38 OHD, Collaboration Call with City of Oxnard at p.4 (Ongoing). 128
as part of this Project, the temporary nature of the Project blurs the sincerity of the objectives— and by extension—the adequacy of the project description. The City cannot seem to reconcile the objectives in the project description with the purported temporary nature of the site.
If truly temporary, the project would fail to satisfy the stated objectives—making Alternative One:
No Project/No Build by far the environmentally superior alternative that the City should adopt. As we stated in our February 14, 2022 comment letter, the City’s concern over reducing diesel truck traffic, if genuine, could be addressed with the deployment of zero-emission trucks and related technologies that are increasingly becoming available in the market. Indeed, at the March 21, 2022 Community Workshop, Port staff touted that the Project’s presumptive tenant, GLOVIS, has led the industry in producing Class-8 zero-emissions trucks.39 This information serves to counter the argument that deploying zero-emission trucks to serve the Port’s vehicle storage operations is infeasible. Therefore, we reiterate our call to the City and the Port to broadly consider deploying zero-emission trucks and other technology as an alternative to building an unnecessary temporary vehicle storage parking lot next to sensitive wetlands.
The City has not Explained the Permanence of the Alleged Benefits of the Project.
Logically, this project cannot provide the promised permanent benefits—increasing economic activity, bringing sustainable jobs, and consolidating existing sites from Camarillo and Ventura— while also being temporary.
In its ongoing collaboration calls with the City, the Port has repeatedly emphasized that the Project will “create 40+ new jobs and add $2.2 million in local salaries annually.”40 However, it does not explain where these jobs and salaries will go after the allegedly temporary project expires. Indeed, when stakeholders asked the Port about potential layoffs for the new workers in the March 2022 Community Workshop, the Port responded that the jobs that the 34-acre site would create are temporary construction jobs, implying contracts that will expire.41 Simply put, the Project is not actually creating any long-term, unionized, and adequately paying jobs. Additionally, in its Project 34 FAQs, the Port has also repeatedly emphasized that the Project will create capacity for 4,944 vehicle storage spaces. The Port fails to explain where these cars will go after the allegedly temporary project expires. Again, when stakeholders asked the Port whether GLOVIS intends to cancel car shipments after the temporary storage facility expires in the March 2022 Community Workshop, the answer was murky at best – stakeholders remain unclear about the future of 39 City of Oxnard, Community Workshop-34 Acre Vehicle Storage Facility Project available online at https://oxnardca.civicclerk.com/web/player.aspx?id=4561 at 2:49:30 – 2:52:00 (Mar. 21, 2022).
40 OHD, Collaboration Call with City of Oxnard – Partnership for Economic Development at p. 2 (Ongoing).
41 City of Oxnard, Community Workshop-34 Acre Vehicle Storage Facility Project available online at https://oxnardca.civicclerk.com/web/player.aspx?id=4561 at 2:44:40 (Mar. 21, 2022). 129
imported cars and other imports.42 If the other projects are truly “separate and detached,” then they will not serve as sites for moving these vehicles.43
These are integral components of the full project that remain unknown, and as such, the DEIR fails to disclose all the impacts of the project.
III. The DEIR Failed to Incorporate Critical Environmental Information in Violation of CEQA.
Without complete environmental reporting, as well as public commentary from an adequately informed public, officials cannot make informed decisions on projects.44 CEQA procedure is intended to not only provide for adequate environmental assessment, but also to “demonstrate to an apprehensive citizenry that the agency has, in fact, analyzed and considered the ecological implications of its action.”45 The integrity of the CEQA process is “dependent on the adequacy of the EIR.”46
The “significant new information” produced by the Port reveals that the DEIR was inadequate and conclusory because it failed to incorporate and inform the public and decisionmakers about the Project’s cumulative impacts, rubberstamped an important traffic analysis, and omitted from consideration reasonable, zero-emission alternatives. The lead agency’s fundamental exclusions in its DEIR deprived the public of informed commentary. As such, the agency also failed to demonstrate how it has taken a hard look at the environmental implications of its actions with respect to the Project. Because these documents reveal serious gaps in the DEIR, they must not only be made part of the record, but the agency must revise and recirculate the DEIR giving full consideration to the environmental consequences.
The DEIR Failed to Incorporate an Accurate Cumulative Impact Assessment. 42 Id. at 2:44:05-2:44:55 (providing vague statements regarding “long term developments” and “future sites to help support the Port” and that such developments will be managed in an “open and transparent” way but not specifically responding to how car shipments will be managed.) 43 Id. at 23:04 and 2:44:00 (the Port acknowledging that they are in preliminary discussions for allegedly “separate and detached” projects – such as the 250-acre site.) 44 Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Constr. Auth., 57 Cal. 4th 439, 447, 452, 304 P.3d 499 (2013) (see also Save the Hill Grp. v. City of Livermore, 76 Cal. App. 5th 1092, 1109, 292 Cal. Rptr. 3d 120, 133 (2022) and League to Save Lake Tahoe Mountain etc. v. Cnty. of Placer, 75 Cal. App. 5th 63, 95, 290 Cal. Rptr. 3d 218, 244 (2022), review denied (May 18, 2022) for recent California courts affirming this approach to prejudicial omissions in EIRs). 45 Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of Univ. of California, 47 Cal. 3d 376, 392, 764 P.2d 278 (1988), as modified on denial of reh'g (Jan. 26, 1989). 46 California Native Plant Soc'y v. City of Santa Cruz, 177 Cal. App. 4th 957, 979-80, 99 Cal Rptr. 3d 572 (2009), as modified on denial of reh’g (Oct. 14, 2009). 130
CEQA requires that the DEIR address cumulative impacts.47 Cumulative impacts are those that result from “the combination of the project evaluated in the EIR together with other projects causing related impacts.”48 Failure to include a complete list of projects that produce related or cumulative impacts is a violation of CEQA.49 This is especially critical if the proposed 34-acre site is not, in fact, temporary and would add to the overall cumulative impacts.
In addition to the projects, the City listed in the DEIR as “reasonably foreseeable, planned and approved future projects” (which, despite being listed, were not considered in a cumulative impact assessment), our review of the recently produced documents provides further evidence that there are planned projects left out of the DEIR, resulting in a cumulative impacts analysis that is “so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment were precluded.”50
For example, the City recently produced an application for a Special Use Permit, which shows that a project site is proposed for a large trailer truck storage facility just east of the 34-acre project site.51 This would presumably increase truck traffic in the general vicinity of the proposed project site. The City also indicated in a Market Street Landing Summary that the Port is pursuing a 2- acre site to create additional space for cargo movement. The summary notes indicate that the space is expected to “yield a 30% increase in capacity” in the long term.52 The newly produced documents further indicate that the Port anticipates significant growth in the coming years, which has not been included in the DEIR nor in any cumulative impact assessment – a fact that the Port itself acknowledges in its correspondence.53 For example, the Port’s deepening and dredging projects are explicitly intended to accommodate anticipated cargo growth on larger vessels and expand the Port’s capacity.54 Yet the cumulative impacts of dredging at the Port were completely left out of the DEIR. This is especially troubling because a portion of its dredging proposal has already undergone environmental review under CEQA and the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) and received federal funding last year,55 which further 47 Cal. Code Regs., tit.14, § 15130; see also Cal. Code Regs., tit.14, § 15355 48 Cal. Code Regs., tit.14, § 15130(a)(1).
49 Id. at § 15130(b)(1).
50 Cal. Code Regs., tit.14, § 15088.5(a)(4).
51 Port of Hueneme Draft Project Description - Temporary Storage Facility at p. 4. 52 The Port of Hueneme, Market Street Landing – Essential to the Port’s Future as an Economic Engine at p. 1.
53 Email between Dona T. Lacayo and Port of Hueneme Staff at p. 1 (Feb. 2019) (Discussing that the impact of more ships and the resulting increase in new business and automotive traffic has not been part of the Project assessment).
54 See, e.g., Oxnard Harbor District, Port Makes Another Splash - $5M Economic Development Grant, September 22, 2021, available at: https://www.portofhueneme.org/eda-grant-09-22-2021. 55 Id. (the U.S. Economic Development Administration awarded the Port $5.1 million to dredge Berth 3 to facilitate larger vessels carrying fresh produce to arrive at the Port); See also The D3 Project: The Dredge, Demo and Delivery Project, U.S. Economic Development Administration – EDA Grant Application PWEAA2020, June 10, 2020.
131
substantiates that the Port dredging projects are “reasonably foreseeable, planned and approved future projects.”
In addition to the dredging project, as commenters noted in their February letter, beginning in April 2020, the Port published a “Priority List for 2020 Grants” which lists the STACKED project, the 34-Acre Temporary Expansion, and the 250 Acre Port Enterprise Zone.
Thereafter in its April 2021 Board Meeting, the Port notes that it anticipates “[i]ncreas[ing] rail and land capacity” (i.e., 34 acres, 250 acres, parking structure).56 The Port has also noted that it is working on securing additional property owned by Arcturus.57 The Port hired consultants to undertake a study of a parking structure for the STACKED project to use in grant applications during summer 2021. This parking structure would be shorter and cover a larger footprint than the multilevel parking structure studied in 2016.58 In the 2021 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy, the Port noted that the STACKED Project would “have 7,500 bays nearly doubling the Port’s current automobile capacity.”59 The first phase will include the base and the next two stories of the structure.60 The second phase is set to add an additional two levels, making it a five-story tall structure.61 Additionally, the Port noted that to retain business, “it will be necessary for the Port to provide infrastructure such as an on-dock parking structure for staging automobiles [and] an off-port multi modal logistics park.”62 In its Financial Year 2022 Capital Outlay Plan, the Port sets aside $5 million in Financial Year 2022 and Financial Year 2023 (a total of $10 million) for the Engineering of a “Parking Structure.”63 Although the vague term “Parking Structure” is unclear, what is clear is that funding has already been allocated for capacity growth projects in the Port.
Inevitably, all these projects tie into the same goal – to resolve the serious space constraints the Port is facing. Clearly, OHD has already invested considerable time and resources into preparing for the development of these related projects – including applying for federal funding. Because these developments are all planned and reasonably foreseeable, the cumulative impacts of these additional projects must be considered in the DEIR.
The Traffic Study Incorporated into the DEIR was Rubberstamped.
As indicated by the documents produced by the City and the OHD in response to the PRA requests, the Port may not have conducted a comprehensive and independent traffic study. 56 Board of Harbor Commissioners, Board Meeting Materials at p. 10 (Apr. 19, 2021). 57 Email from Kristin Decas to Commissioners, Subject: Weekly Update (June 11, 2021). 58 Oxnard Harbor District, Professional Services Agreement (May 26, 2021). 59 Oxnard Harbor District Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy at p. 50 (2021). 60 Id. 61 Id. 62 Id.
63 The Port of Hueneme Oxnard Harbor District, FY 2022 Capital Outlay Plan (2021). 132
An EIR required by CEQA must include sufficient detail to enable those who did not participate in its preparation to understand and meaningfully consider the issues raised by the proposed project.64 An omission in a DEIR significant impacts analysis is deemed prejudicial if it deprives the public and decisionmakers of substantial relevant information about the project’s likely adverse impacts.65 Here, the produced documents make clear that there was never any intention for the Port to vet the real traffic impacts of the 34-acre site. Instead, the documents demonstrate that the Port seems to willingly turn a blind eye to the full impacts.
In an email dated August 11, 2018, a land-use planning specialist asked whether an expert could “prepare a letter report for the argument against needing a traffic study.”66 Thereafter on August 27, 2018, the same land-use planning specialist noted that “the City just needs a paper trail – this way they can cover themselves with a letter from a professional.”67 The next day on August 28, 2018, the expert responded, noting that “[e]verything we do will be based on that [Project] description. I will just have to take the time to type up a trip generation analysis based on the trips in noted in the Jensen Design letter and charge the Port for my time.”68 Thus, the Associated Transportation Engineers Traffic Study (“Traffic Study”) that the DEIR relies on appears to have been based solely on a Project Description and a Design letter – omitting consideration of CEQA guidelines and the Ventura County Freight Corridors Study.
Because of the shoddy traffic analysis that was performed, the numbers cited by the Port for the vehicle impacts of the 34-acre site vary across documents and are unreliable. For example, in one document, the Port notes that “32 additional vehicles would be imported/exported per day (576 vehicles per month)”69 In another document, GLOVIS notes that they expect to “shuttle 10 - 12 vehicles at one time … between the hours of 7:00 am and 4:00 pm Monday through Friday” which amounts to an “average of 54 vehicles a day” (or 972 vehicles per month).70 The Associated Transportation Engineers’ Traffic Assessment notes, “76 vehicles will be transported to and from the Port to the Storage Lot for approximately 18 days of every month”71 (or a total of 1368 vehicles per month).
64 Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21100.
65 See Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Constr. Auth., 57 Cal. 4th 439, 304 P.3d 499 (2013) (see also Save the Hill Grp. v. City of Livermore, 76 Cal. App. 5th 1092, 1109, 292 Cal. Rptr. 3d 120, 133 (2022) and League to Save Lake Tahoe Mountain etc. v. Cnty. of Placer, 75 Cal. App. 5th 63, 95, 290 Cal. Rptr. 3d 218, 244 (2022), review denied (May 18, 2022) for recent California courts affirming this approach to prejudicial omissions in EIRs). 66 See Emails between Dona T. Lacayo, Hollee King, and Darryl F. Nelson at p. 7 of 8 (Aug. 2018) (emphasis added).
67 See Emails between Dona T. Lacayo and Kevin Waldron at p. 2 of 8 (Aug. 2018) (emphasis added).
68 See Emails between Dona T. Lacayo and Darryl F. Nelson at p. 1 of 11 (Aug. 2018). 69 See Letter from The Port of Hueneme to City of Oxnard, Subject SUP Project Description – Temporary Outdoor Vehicle Storage at p. 4 (Aug. 27, 2018). 70 See Letter from Frank Cerrito (GLOVIS) to Ashley Golden Re: Oxnard Storage Lot (Aug. 9, 2018).
71 Assoc. Transportation Engineers, Traffic Impact Study for the Port of Hueneme Temporary Vehicle Storage Special Use Permit – City of Oxnard at p.2 (Aug. 29, 2018). 133
There remains confusion as to the exact number of vehicles to be transported and the extent to which additional trucks/shuttles will be needed. As such, this lack of consistency deprives the public and decisionmakers of substantial relevant information about the project’s likely adverse traffic impacts as required under CEQA.
The Port Failed to Provide a Reasonable Explanation for not Considering a Zero-Emission Vehicle Alternative.
In our February 2022 letter, we recommended that the City should more thoroughly consider zeroemissions trucks as a reasonable and viable alternative and mitigation measure for this Project.
The viability of this alternative is supported by OHD’s own statements touting GLOVIS as one of the region’s only makers of HD Class 8 zero-emission trucks. OHD reiterated this commitment to zero-emission technology during the Community Workshop held on March 21, 2022.72 Yet, OHD summarily dismisses this alternative as infeasible.
Currently, the DEIR does not offer any mitigation or alternative for driving hundreds of cars individually along public roads each day to and from the proposed Project site. As mentioned above, the ambiguity surrounding whether the 34-Acre site will truly be temporary calls into question whether this Project will meet the stated objectives. The “no-build” alternative, by far, is the environmentally superior alternative. When coupled with the deployment of zero-emission trucks for car transport, the Port and the City have an opportunity to mitigate the impact of operations and offer the community a chance for cleaner air. Despite claiming this approach would prove infeasible, the Port also acknowledges that its own client, GLOVIS, is a leader in producing zero-emissions Class 8 trucks.73 In fact, GLOVIS noted that operations at the Port would transition trucks to hydrogen fuel cell technology, similar to what is being done as a pilot at the Port of Oakland.74 Moreover, GLOVIS itself touts being a leader in driving decarbonization and is committed to being a zero-emissions company by 2040.75 This reality belies the argument that a zero-emissions transition for the Port and GLOVIS’ operations is infeasible.
Furthermore, the Port claims that the site may be used as storage for zero-emission cars. Port representatives claim that of the vehicles likely to be stored at the proposed 34-acre site, “many of these vehicles will be zero emission electric cars.”76 Yet, there is no mention of zero-emission cars in the DEIR or an estimate of the number of zero-emission cars expected in the 34-acre site.
Suppose the Port intends to use the site for purposes of storing electric vehicles. In that case, this potentially raises a host of additional questions including, but not limited to, whether additional infrastructure is needed to support battery electric vehicles being stored there for long periods of time. This further shows that the information presented in the DEIR does not offer the public or 72 City of Oxnard, Community Workshop-34 Acre Vehicle Storage Facility Project available online at https://oxnardca.civicclerk.com/web/player.aspx?id=4561 at 2:57:19 (Mar. 21, 2022). 73 Id. 74 Id. at 1:03:30 – 1:04:00.
75 Id. at 1:03:20 – 1:03:30; 1:05:00 – 1:05:14. 76 Id. at 18:40 – 19:00. 134