Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
4.4000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.5100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2400e-
003
3.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.0094
1.0094
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0100
Total
4.4000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.5100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2400e-
003
3.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.0094
1.0094
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0100
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.0109
0.1048
0.1609
2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000
22.0292
22.0292
7.1200e-
003
0.0000
22.2073
Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0109
0.1048
0.1609
2.5000e-
004
5.1500e-
003
5.1500e-
003
4.7400e-
003
4.7400e-
003
0.0000
22.0292
22.0292
7.1200e-
003
0.0000
22.2073
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
4.4000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.5100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2400e-
003
3.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.0094
1.0094
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0100
Total
4.4000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.5100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2400e-
003
3.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
1.0094
1.0094
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0100
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating
4.1372
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1600e-
003
0.0213
0.0317
5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000
4.4682
4.4682
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
4.4745
Total
4.1404
0.0213
0.0317
5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000
4.4682
4.4682
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
4.4745
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
7.4800e-
003
4.9300e-
003
0.0596
1.9000e-
004
0.0209
1.6000e-
004
0.0211
5.5500e-
003
1.5000e-
004
5.7000e-
003
0.0000
17.1287
17.1287
4.3000e-
004
0.0000
17.1394
Total
7.4800e-
003
4.9300e-
003
0.0596
1.9000e-
004
0.0209
1.6000e-
004
0.0211
5.5500e-
003
1.5000e-
004
5.7000e-
003
0.0000
17.1287
17.1287
4.3000e-
004
0.0000
17.1394
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating
4.1372
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1600e-
003
0.0213
0.0317
5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000
4.4682
4.4682
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
4.4745
Total
4.1404
0.0213
0.0317
5.0000e-
005
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
1.0700e-
003
0.0000
4.4682
4.4682
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
4.4745
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
7.4800e-
003
4.9300e-
003
0.0596
1.9000e-
004
0.0209
1.6000e-
004
0.0211
5.5500e-
003
1.5000e-
004
5.7000e-
003
0.0000
17.1287
17.1287
4.3000e-
004
0.0000
17.1394
Total
7.4800e-
003
4.9300e-
003
0.0596
1.9000e-
004
0.0209
1.6000e-
004
0.0211
5.5500e-
003
1.5000e-
004
5.7000e-
003
0.0000
17.1287
17.1287
4.3000e-
004
0.0000
17.1394
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated
1.5857
7.9962
19.1834
0.0821
7.7979
0.0580
7.8559
2.0895
0.0539
2.1434
0.0000
7,620.498
6 7,620.498
6 0.3407
0.0000
7,629.016
2 Unmitigated
1.5857
7.9962
19.1834
0.0821
7.7979
0.0580
7.8559
2.0895
0.0539
2.1434
0.0000
7,620.498
6 7,620.498
6 0.3407
0.0000
7,629.016
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
145.75
154.25
154.00
506,227
506,227
Apartments Mid Rise
4,026.75
3,773.25
4075.50
13,660,065
13,660,065
General Office Building
288.45
62.55 31.05
706,812
706,812
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
2,368.80
2,873.52
2817.72
3,413,937
3,413,937
Hotel
192.00
187.50
160.00
445,703
445,703
Quality Restaurant
501.12
511.92
461.20
707,488
707,488
Regional Shopping Center
528.08
601.44
357.84
1,112,221
1,112,221
Total
8,050.95
8,164.43
8,057.31
20,552,452
20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Apartments Low Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 Apartments Mid Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 General Office Building
16.60 8.40
6.90 33.00
48.00 19.00
77 19
4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40
6.90 8.50
72.50 19.00
37 20
43 Hotel
16.60 8.40
6.90 19.40
61.60 19.00
58 38
4 Quality Restaurant
16.60 8.40
6.90 12.00
69.00 19.00
38 18
44 Regional Shopping Center
16.60 8.40
6.90 16.30
64.70 19.00
54 35
11 5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Low Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Apartments Mid Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
General Office Building
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Hotel
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Quality Restaurant
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Regional Shopping Center
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037
0.0215
2,521.635
6 Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037
0.0215
2,521.635
6 NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
1,383.426
7 1,383.426
7 0.0265
0.0254
1,391.647
8 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
1,383.426
7 1,383.426
7 0.0265
0.0254
1,391.647
8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494
2.2000e-
003
0.0188
8.0100e-
003
1.2000e-
004
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
0.0000
21.7988
21.7988
4.2000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
21.9284
Apartments Mid
Rise
1.30613e
+007
0.0704
0.6018
0.2561
3.8400e-
003
0.0487
0.0487
0.0487
0.0487
0.0000
696.9989
696.9989
0.0134
0.0128
701.1408
General Office
Building
468450
2.5300e-
003
0.0230
0.0193
1.4000e-
004
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
0.0000
24.9983
24.9983
4.8000e-
004
4.6000e-
004
25.1468
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
8.30736e
+006
0.0448
0.4072
0.3421
2.4400e-
003
0.0310
0.0310
0.0310
0.0310
0.0000
443.3124
443.3124
8.5000e-
003
8.1300e-
003
445.9468
Hotel
1.74095e
+006
9.3900e-
003
0.0853
0.0717
5.1000e-
004
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
0.0000
92.9036
92.9036
1.7800e-
003
1.7000e-
003
93.4557
Quality
Restaurant
1.84608e
+006
9.9500e-
003
0.0905
0.0760
5.4000e-
004
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
0.0000
98.5139
98.5139
1.8900e-
003
1.8100e-
003
99.0993
Regional
Shopping Center
91840
5.0000e-
004
4.5000e-
003
3.7800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
4.9009
4.9009
9.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
005
4.9301
Total
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
1,383.426
8 1,383.426
8 0.0265
0.0254
1,391.647
8 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494
2.2000e-
003
0.0188
8.0100e-
003
1.2000e-
004
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
1.5200e-
003
0.0000
21.7988
21.7988
4.2000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
21.9284
Apartments Mid
Rise
1.30613e
+007
0.0704
0.6018
0.2561
3.8400e-
003
0.0487
0.0487
0.0487
0.0487
0.0000
696.9989
696.9989
0.0134
0.0128
701.1408
General Office
Building
468450
2.5300e-
003
0.0230
0.0193
1.4000e-
004
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
1.7500e-
003
0.0000
24.9983
24.9983
4.8000e-
004
4.6000e-
004
25.1468
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
8.30736e
+006
0.0448
0.4072
0.3421
2.4400e-
003
0.0310
0.0310
0.0310
0.0310
0.0000
443.3124
443.3124
8.5000e-
003
8.1300e-
003
445.9468
Hotel
1.74095e
+006
9.3900e-
003
0.0853
0.0717
5.1000e-
004
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
6.4900e-
003
0.0000
92.9036
92.9036
1.7800e-
003
1.7000e-
003
93.4557
Quality
Restaurant
1.84608e
+006
9.9500e-
003
0.0905
0.0760
5.4000e-
004
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
6.8800e-
003
0.0000
98.5139
98.5139
1.8900e-
003
1.8100e-
003
99.0993
Regional
Shopping Center
91840
5.0000e-
004
4.5000e-
003
3.7800e-
003
3.0000e-
005
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
3.4000e-
004
0.0000
4.9009
4.9009
9.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
005
4.9301
Total
0.1398
1.2312
0.7770
7.6200e-
003
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0966
0.0000
1,383.426
8 1,383.426
8 0.0265
0.0254
1,391.647
8 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010
33.7770
1.3900e-
003
2.9000e-
004
33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise
3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519
0.0107
1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550
186.2502
7.6900e-
003
1.5900e-
003
186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1.58904e
+006
506.3022
0.0209
4.3200e-
003
508.1135
Hotel
550308
175.3399
7.2400e-
003
1.5000e-
003
175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120
112.5116
4.6500e-
003
9.6000e-
004
112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000
240.8778
9.9400e-
003
2.0600e-
003
241.7395
Total
2,512.646
5 0.1037
0.0215
2,521.635
6 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010
33.7770
1.3900e-
003
2.9000e-
004
33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise
3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519
0.0107
1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550
186.2502
7.6900e-
003
1.5900e-
003
186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1.58904e
+006
506.3022
0.0209
4.3200e-
003
508.1135
Hotel
550308
175.3399
7.2400e-
003
1.5000e-
003
175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120
112.5116
4.6500e-
003
9.6000e-
004
112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000
240.8778
9.9400e-
003
2.0600e-
003
241.7395
Total
2,512.646
5 0.1037
0.0215
2,521.635
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6700e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
Unmitigated
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6700e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.4137
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
4.3998
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
0.0206
0.1763
0.0750
1.1200e-
003
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0000
204.1166
204.1166
3.9100e-
003
3.7400e-
003
205.3295
Landscaping
0.3096
0.1187
10.3054
5.4000e-
004
0.0572
0.0572
0.0572
0.0572
0.0000
16.8504
16.8504
0.0161
0.0000
17.2540
Total
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6600e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.4137
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
4.3998
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
0.0206
0.1763
0.0750
1.1200e-
003
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0000
204.1166
204.1166
3.9100e-
003
3.7400e-
003
205.3295
Landscaping
0.3096
0.1187
10.3054
5.4000e-
004
0.0572
0.0572
0.0572
0.0572
0.0000
16.8504
16.8504
0.0161
0.0000
17.2540
Total
5.1437
0.2950
10.3804
1.6600e-
003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0000
220.9670
220.9670
0.0201
3.7400e-
003
222.5835
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
Unmitigated
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
1.62885 /
1.02688
10.9095
0.0535
1.3400e-
003
12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise
63.5252 /
40.0485
425.4719
2.0867
0.0523
493.2363
General Office
Building
7.99802 /
4.90201
53.0719
0.2627
6.5900e-
003
61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
10.9272 /
0.697482
51.2702
0.3580
8.8200e-
003
62.8482
Hotel
1.26834 /
0.140927
6.1633
0.0416
1.0300e-
003
7.5079
Quality
Restaurant
2.42827 /
0.154996
11.3934
0.0796
1.9600e-
003
13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center
4.14806 /
2.54236
27.5250
0.1363
3.4200e-
003
31.9490
Total
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
1.62885 /
1.02688
10.9095
0.0535
1.3400e-
003
12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise
63.5252 /
40.0485
425.4719
2.0867
0.0523
493.2363
General Office
Building
7.99802 /
4.90201
53.0719
0.2627
6.5900e-
003
61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
10.9272 /
0.697482
51.2702
0.3580
8.8200e-
003
62.8482
Hotel
1.26834 /
0.140927
6.1633
0.0416
1.0300e-
003
7.5079
Quality
Restaurant
2.42827 /
0.154996
11.3934
0.0796
1.9600e-
003
13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center
4.14806 /
2.54236
27.5250
0.1363
3.4200e-
003
31.9490
Total
585.8052
3.0183
0.0755
683.7567
Mitigated
8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Unmitigated
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
11.5 2.3344
0.1380
0.0000
5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5
91.0415
5.3804
0.0000
225.5513
General Office
Building
41.85 8.4952
0.5021
0.0000
21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4
86.9613
5.1393
0.0000
215.4430
Hotel
27.38 5.5579
0.3285
0.0000
13.7694
Quality
Restaurant
7.3 1.4818
0.0876
0.0000
3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center
58.8 11.9359
0.7054
0.0000
29.5706
Total
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
11.5 2.3344
0.1380
0.0000
5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5
91.0415
5.3804
0.0000
225.5513
General Office
Building
41.85 8.4952
0.5021
0.0000
21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4
86.9613
5.1393
0.0000
215.4430
Hotel
27.38 5.5579
0.3285
0.0000
13.7694
Quality
Restaurant
7.3 1.4818
0.0876
0.0000
3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center
58.8 11.9359
0.7054
0.0000
29.5706
Total
207.8079
12.2811
0.0000
514.8354
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
11.0 Vegetation
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building
45.00 1000sqft
1.03 45,000.00
0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
36.00 1000sqft
0.83 36,000.00
0 Hotel
50.00 Room
1.67 72,600.00
0 Quality Restaurant
8.00 1000sqft
0.18 8,000.00
0 Apartments Low Rise
25.00 Dwelling Unit
1.56 25,000.00
72 Apartments Mid Rise
975.00
Dwelling Unit
25.66 975,000.00
2789
Regional Shopping Center
56.00 1000sqft
1.29 56,000.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)
2.2 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Southern California Edison
2028
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44
0.029
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00 tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00 tblFireplaces
NumberWood
1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberWood
48.75 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
158.37
79.82 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
131.84
78.27 tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
127.15
65.80 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021
4.2561
46.4415
31.4494
0.0636
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
6,163.416
6 6,163.416
6 1.9475
0.0000
6,212.103
9 2022
4.5441
38.8811
40.8776
0.1240
8.8255
1.6361
10.4616
3.6369
1.5052
5.1421
0.0000
12,493.44
03 12,493.44
03 1.9485
0.0000
12,518.57
07 2023
4.1534
25.7658
38.7457
0.1206
7.0088
0.7592
7.7679
1.8799
0.7136
2.5935
0.0000
12,150.48
90 12,150.48
90 0.9589
0.0000
12,174.46
15 2024
237.0219
9.5478
14.9642
0.0239
1.2171
0.4694
1.2875
0.3229
0.4319
0.4621
0.0000
2,313.180
8 2,313.180
8 0.7166
0.0000
2,331.095
6 Maximum
237.0219
46.4415
40.8776
0.1240
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,493.44
03 12,493.44
03 1.9485
0.0000
12,518.57
07 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021
4.2561
46.4415
31.4494
0.0636
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
6,163.416
6 6,163.416
6 1.9475
0.0000
6,212.103
9 2022
4.5441
38.8811
40.8776
0.1240
8.8255
1.6361
10.4616
3.6369
1.5052
5.1421
0.0000
12,493.44
03 12,493.44
03 1.9485
0.0000
12,518.57
07 2023
4.1534
25.7658
38.7457
0.1206
7.0088
0.7592
7.7679
1.8799
0.7136
2.5935
0.0000
12,150.48
90 12,150.48
90 0.9589
0.0000
12,174.46
15 2024
237.0219
9.5478
14.9642
0.0239
1.2171
0.4694
1.2875
0.3229
0.4319
0.4621
0.0000
2,313.180
8 2,313.180
8 0.7166
0.0000
2,331.095
5 Maximum
237.0219
46.4415
40.8776
0.1240
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,493.44
03 12,493.44
03 1.9485
0.0000
12,518.57
07 Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Energy
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mobile
9.8489
45.4304
114.8495
0.4917
45.9592
0.3360
46.2951
12.2950
0.3119
12.6070
50,306.60
34 50,306.60
34 2.1807
50,361.12
08 Total
41.1168
67.2262
207.5497
0.6278
45.9592
2.4626
48.4217
12.2950
2.4385
14.7336
0.0000
76,811.18
16 76,811.18
16 2.8282
0.4832
77,025.87
86 Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Energy
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mobile
9.8489
45.4304
114.8495
0.4917
45.9592
0.3360
46.2951
12.2950
0.3119
12.6070
50,306.60
34 50,306.60
34 2.1807
50,361.12
08 Total
41.1168
67.2262
207.5497
0.6278
45.9592
2.4626
48.4217
12.2950
2.4385
14.7336
0.0000
76,811.18
16 76,811.18
16 2.8282
0.4832
77,025.87
86 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
9/1/2021
10/12/2021
5 30
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
10/13/2021
11/9/2021
5 20
3 Grading
Grading
11/10/2021
1/11/2022
5 45
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
1/12/2022
12/12/2023
5 500
5 Paving
Paving
12/13/2023
1/30/2024
5 35
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
1/31/2024
3/19/2024
5 35
OffRoad Equipment
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
±
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158
0.38 Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158
0.38 Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187
0.41 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247
0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367
0.48 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231
0.29 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130
0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132
0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
3.3074
0.0000
3.3074
0.5008
0.0000
0.5008
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
1.5513
1.5513
1.4411
1.4411
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
6 15.00
0.00 458.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 801.00
143.00
0.00 10.00
6.90 20.00
LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 160.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.1273
4.0952
0.9602
0.0119
0.2669
0.0126
0.2795
0.0732
0.0120
0.0852
1,292.241
3 1,292.241
3 0.0877
1,294.433
7 Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0487
0.0313
0.4282
1.1800e-
003
0.1141
9.5000e-
004
0.1151
0.0303
8.8000e-
004
0.0311
117.2799
117.2799
3.5200e-
003
117.3678
Total
0.1760
4.1265
1.3884
0.0131
0.3810
0.0135
0.3946
0.1034
0.0129
0.1163
1,409.521
2 1,409.521
2 0.0912
1,411.801
5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
3.3074
0.0000
3.3074
0.5008
0.0000
0.5008
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
1.5513
1.5513
1.4411
1.4411
0.0000
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419
0.0000
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.1273
4.0952
0.9602
0.0119
0.2669
0.0126
0.2795
0.0732
0.0120
0.0852
1,292.241
3 1,292.241
3 0.0877
1,294.433
7 Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0487
0.0313
0.4282
1.1800e-
003
0.1141
9.5000e-
004
0.1151
0.0303
8.8000e-
004
0.0311
117.2799
117.2799
3.5200e-
003
117.3678
Total
0.1760
4.1265
1.3884
0.0131
0.3810
0.0135
0.3946
0.1034
0.0129
0.1163
1,409.521
2 1,409.521
2 0.0912
1,411.801
5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
18.0663
0.0000
18.0663
9.9307
0.0000
9.9307
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
2.0445
2.0445
1.8809
1.8809
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0584
0.0375
0.5139
1.4100e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
140.7359
140.7359
4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Total
0.0584
0.0375
0.5139
1.4100e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
140.7359
140.7359
4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
18.0663
0.0000
18.0663
9.9307
0.0000
9.9307
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
2.0445
2.0445
1.8809
1.8809
0.0000
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116
0.0000
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0584
0.0375
0.5139
1.4100e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
140.7359
140.7359
4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Total
0.0584
0.0375
0.5139
1.4100e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
140.7359
140.7359
4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
1.9853
1.9853
1.8265
1.8265
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0649
0.0417
0.5710
1.5700e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
156.3732
156.3732
4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Total
0.0649
0.0417
0.5710
1.5700e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
156.3732
156.3732
4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
1.9853
1.9853
1.8265
1.8265
0.0000
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230
0.0000
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0649
0.0417
0.5710
1.5700e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
156.3732
156.3732
4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Total
0.0649
0.0417
0.5710
1.5700e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
156.3732
156.3732
4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
1.6349
1.6349
1.5041
1.5041
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Total
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
1.6349
1.6349
1.5041
1.5041
0.0000
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006
0.0000
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Total
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.4079
13.2032
3.4341
0.0364
0.9155
0.0248
0.9404
0.2636
0.0237
0.2873
3,896.548
2 3,896.548
2 0.2236
3,902.138
4 Worker
2.4299
1.5074
21.0801
0.0607
6.0932
0.0493
6.1425
1.6163
0.0454
1.6617
6,042.558
5 6,042.558
5 0.1697
6,046.800
0 Total
2.8378
14.7106
24.5142
0.0971
7.0087
0.0741
7.0828
1.8799
0.0691
1.9490
9,939.106
7 9,939.106
7 0.3933
9,948.938
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.4079
13.2032
3.4341
0.0364
0.9155
0.0248
0.9404
0.2636
0.0237
0.2873
3,896.548
2 3,896.548
2 0.2236
3,902.138
4 Worker
2.4299
1.5074
21.0801
0.0607
6.0932
0.0493
6.1425
1.6163
0.0454
1.6617
6,042.558
5 6,042.558
5 0.1697
6,046.800
0 Total
2.8378
14.7106
24.5142
0.0971
7.0087
0.0741
7.0828
1.8799
0.0691
1.9490
9,939.106
7 9,939.106
7 0.3933
9,948.938
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.3027
10.0181
3.1014
0.0352
0.9156
0.0116
0.9271
0.2636
0.0111
0.2747
3,773.876
2 3,773.876
2 0.1982
3,778.830
0 Worker
2.2780
1.3628
19.4002
0.0584
6.0932
0.0479
6.1411
1.6163
0.0441
1.6604
5,821.402
8 5,821.402
8 0.1529
5,825.225
4 Total
2.5807
11.3809
22.5017
0.0936
7.0088
0.0595
7.0682
1.8799
0.0552
1.9350
9,595.279
0 9,595.279
0 0.3511
9,604.055
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
0.0000
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
0.0000
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.3027
10.0181
3.1014
0.0352
0.9156
0.0116
0.9271
0.2636
0.0111
0.2747
3,773.876
2 3,773.876
2 0.1982
3,778.830
0 Worker
2.2780
1.3628
19.4002
0.0584
6.0932
0.0479
6.1411
1.6163
0.0441
1.6604
5,821.402
8 5,821.402
8 0.1529
5,825.225
4 Total
2.5807
11.3809
22.5017
0.0936
7.0088
0.0595
7.0682
1.8799
0.0552
1.9350
9,595.279
0 9,595.279
0 0.3511
9,604.055
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Total
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Total
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Total
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
0.0000
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
0.0000
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Total
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating
236.4115
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.1808
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.4296
0.2481
3.6098
0.0113
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280
1,127.458
3 Total
0.4296
0.2481
3.6098
0.0113
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280
1,127.458
3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating
236.4115
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.1808
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.4296
0.2481
3.6098
0.0113
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280
1,127.458
3 Total
0.4296
0.2481
3.6098
0.0113
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280
1,127.458
3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
9.8489
45.4304
114.8495
0.4917
45.9592
0.3360
46.2951
12.2950
0.3119
12.6070
50,306.60
34 50,306.60
34 2.1807
50,361.12
08 Unmitigated
9.8489
45.4304
114.8495
0.4917
45.9592
0.3360
46.2951
12.2950
0.3119
12.6070
50,306.60
34 50,306.60
34 2.1807
50,361.12
08 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
145.75
154.25
154.00
506,227
506,227
Apartments Mid Rise
4,026.75
3,773.25
4075.50
13,660,065
13,660,065
General Office Building
288.45
62.55 31.05
706,812
706,812
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
2,368.80
2,873.52
2817.72
3,413,937
3,413,937
Hotel
192.00
187.50
160.00
445,703
445,703
Quality Restaurant
501.12
511.92
461.20
707,488
707,488
Regional Shopping Center
528.08
601.44
357.84
1,112,221
1,112,221
Total
8,050.95
8,164.43
8,057.31
20,552,452
20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Apartments Low Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 Apartments Mid Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 General Office Building
16.60 8.40
6.90 33.00
48.00 19.00
77 19
4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40
6.90 8.50
72.50 19.00
37 20
43 Hotel
16.60 8.40
6.90 19.40
61.60 19.00
58 38
4 Quality Restaurant
16.60 8.40
6.90 12.00
69.00 19.00
38 18
44 Regional Shopping Center
16.60 8.40
6.90 16.30
64.70 19.00
54 35
11 5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Low Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Apartments Mid Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
General Office Building
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Hotel
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Quality Restaurant
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Regional Shopping Center
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16
0.0121
0.1031
0.0439
6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662
131.6662
2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3
0.3859
3.2978
1.4033
0.0211
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
4,209.916
4 4,209.916
4 0.0807
0.0772
4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42
0.0138
0.1258
0.1057
7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911
150.9911
2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9
0.2455
2.2314
1.8743
0.0134
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
2,677.634
2 2,677.634
2 0.0513
0.0491
2,693.546
0 Hotel
4769.72
0.0514
0.4676
0.3928
2.8100e-
003
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
561.1436
561.1436
0.0108
0.0103
564.4782
Quality
Restaurant
5057.75
0.0545
0.4959
0.4165
2.9800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
595.0298
595.0298
0.0114
0.0109
598.5658
Regional
Shopping Center
251.616
2.7100e-
003
0.0247
0.0207
1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019
29.6019
5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1.11916
0.0121
0.1031
0.0439
6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662
131.6662
2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35.7843
0.3859
3.2978
1.4033
0.0211
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
4,209.916
4 4,209.916
4 0.0807
0.0772
4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1.28342
0.0138
0.1258
0.1057
7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911
150.9911
2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22.7599
0.2455
2.2314
1.8743
0.0134
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
2,677.634
2 2,677.634
2 0.0513
0.0491
2,693.546
0 Hotel
4.76972
0.0514
0.4676
0.3928
2.8100e-
003
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
561.1436
561.1436
0.0108
0.0103
564.4782
Quality
Restaurant
5.05775
0.0545
0.4959
0.4165
2.9800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
595.0298
595.0298
0.0114
0.0109
598.5658
Regional
Shopping Center
0.251616
2.7100e-
003
0.0247
0.0207
1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019
29.6019
5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
1.6500
14.1000
6.0000
0.0900
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
0.0000
18,000.00
00 18,000.00
00 0.3450
0.3300
18,106.96
50 Landscaping
2.4766
0.9496
82.4430
4.3600e-
003
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
148.5950
148.5950
0.1424
152.1542
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
8.0 Waste Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
1.6500
14.1000
6.0000
0.0900
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
0.0000
18,000.00
00 18,000.00
00 0.3450
0.3300
18,106.96
50 Landscaping
2.4766
0.9496
82.4430
4.3600e-
003
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
148.5950
148.5950
0.1424
152.1542
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building
45.00 1000sqft
1.03 45,000.00
0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
36.00 1000sqft
0.83 36,000.00
0 Hotel
50.00 Room
1.67 72,600.00
0 Quality Restaurant
8.00 1000sqft
0.18 8,000.00
0 Apartments Low Rise
25.00 Dwelling Unit
1.56 25,000.00
72 Apartments Mid Rise
975.00
Dwelling Unit
25.66 975,000.00
2789
Regional Shopping Center
56.00 1000sqft
1.29 56,000.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)
2.2 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Southern California Edison
2028
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44
0.029
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00 tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00 tblFireplaces
NumberWood
1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberWood
48.75 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripLength
14.70 10.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
158.37
79.82 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
131.84
78.27 tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
127.15
65.80 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021
4.2621
46.4460
31.4068
0.0635
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
6,154.337
7 6,154.337
7 1.9472
0.0000
6,203.018
6 2022
4.7966
38.8851
39.6338
0.1195
8.8255
1.6361
10.4616
3.6369
1.5052
5.1421
0.0000
12,035.34
40 12,035.34
40 1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
13 2023
4.3939
25.8648
37.5031
0.1162
7.0088
0.7598
7.7685
1.8799
0.7142
2.5940
0.0000
11,710.40
80 11,710.40
80 0.9617
0.0000
11,734.44
97 2024
237.0656
9.5503
14.9372
0.0238
1.2171
0.4694
1.2875
0.3229
0.4319
0.4621
0.0000
2,307.051
7 2,307.051
7 0.7164
0.0000
2,324.962
7 Maximum
237.0656
46.4460
39.6338
0.1195
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,035.34
40 12,035.34
40 1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
13 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021
4.2621
46.4460
31.4068
0.0635
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
6,154.337
7 6,154.337
7 1.9472
0.0000
6,203.018
6 2022
4.7966
38.8851
39.6338
0.1195
8.8255
1.6361
10.4616
3.6369
1.5052
5.1421
0.0000
12,035.34
40 12,035.34
40 1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
13 2023
4.3939
25.8648
37.5031
0.1162
7.0088
0.7598
7.7685
1.8799
0.7142
2.5940
0.0000
11,710.40
80 11,710.40
80 0.9617
0.0000
11,734.44
97 2024
237.0656
9.5503
14.9372
0.0238
1.2171
0.4694
1.2875
0.3229
0.4319
0.4621
0.0000
2,307.051
7 2,307.051
7 0.7164
0.0000
2,324.962
7 Maximum
237.0656
46.4460
39.6338
0.1195
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,035.34
40 12,035.34
40 1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
13 Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Energy
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mobile
9.5233
45.9914
110.0422
0.4681
45.9592
0.3373
46.2965
12.2950
0.3132
12.6083
47,917.80
05 47,917.80
05 2.1953
47,972.68
39 Total
40.7912
67.7872
202.7424
0.6043
45.9592
2.4640
48.4231
12.2950
2.4399
14.7349
0.0000
74,422.37
87 74,422.37
87 2.8429
0.4832
74,637.44
17 Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Energy
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mobile
9.5233
45.9914
110.0422
0.4681
45.9592
0.3373
46.2965
12.2950
0.3132
12.6083
47,917.80
05 47,917.80
05 2.1953
47,972.68
39 Total
40.7912
67.7872
202.7424
0.6043
45.9592
2.4640
48.4231
12.2950
2.4399
14.7349
0.0000
74,422.37
87 74,422.37
87 2.8429
0.4832
74,637.44
17 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
9/1/2021
10/12/2021
5 30
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
10/13/2021
11/9/2021
5 20
3 Grading
Grading
11/10/2021
1/11/2022
5 45
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
1/12/2022
12/12/2023
5 500
5 Paving
Paving
12/13/2023
1/30/2024
5 35
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
1/31/2024
3/19/2024
5 35
OffRoad Equipment
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
±
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158
0.38 Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158
0.38 Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187
0.41 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247
0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367
0.48 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231
0.29 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130
0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132
0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
3.3074
0.0000
3.3074
0.5008
0.0000
0.5008
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
1.5513
1.5513
1.4411
1.4411
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
6 15.00
0.00 458.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 801.00
143.00
0.00 10.00
6.90 20.00
LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 160.00
0.00 0.00
10.00 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.1304
4.1454
1.0182
0.0117
0.2669
0.0128
0.2797
0.0732
0.0122
0.0854
1,269.855
5 1,269.855
5 0.0908
1,272.125
2 Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0532
0.0346
0.3963
1.1100e-
003
0.1141
9.5000e-
004
0.1151
0.0303
8.8000e-
004
0.0311
110.4707
110.4707
3.3300e-
003
110.5539
Total
0.1835
4.1800
1.4144
0.0128
0.3810
0.0137
0.3948
0.1034
0.0131
0.1165
1,380.326
2 1,380.326
2 0.0941
1,382.679
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
3.3074
0.0000
3.3074
0.5008
0.0000
0.5008
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
1.5513
1.5513
1.4411
1.4411
0.0000
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419
0.0000
3,747.944
9 3,747.944
9 1.0549
3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.1304
4.1454
1.0182
0.0117
0.2669
0.0128
0.2797
0.0732
0.0122
0.0854
1,269.855
5 1,269.855
5 0.0908
1,272.125
2 Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0532
0.0346
0.3963
1.1100e-
003
0.1141
9.5000e-
004
0.1151
0.0303
8.8000e-
004
0.0311
110.4707
110.4707
3.3300e-
003
110.5539
Total
0.1835
4.1800
1.4144
0.0128
0.3810
0.0137
0.3948
0.1034
0.0131
0.1165
1,380.326
2 1,380.326
2 0.0941
1,382.679
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
18.0663
0.0000
18.0663
9.9307
0.0000
9.9307
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
2.0445
2.0445
1.8809
1.8809
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0638
0.0415
0.4755
1.3300e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
132.5649
132.5649
3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Total
0.0638
0.0415
0.4755
1.3300e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
132.5649
132.5649
3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
18.0663
0.0000
18.0663
9.9307
0.0000
9.9307
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
2.0445
2.0445
1.8809
1.8809
0.0000
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116
0.0000
3,685.656
9 3,685.656
9 1.1920
3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0638
0.0415
0.4755
1.3300e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
132.5649
132.5649
3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Total
0.0638
0.0415
0.4755
1.3300e-
003
0.1369
1.1400e-
003
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
003
0.0374
132.5649
132.5649
3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
1.9853
1.9853
1.8265
1.8265
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0709
0.0462
0.5284
1.4800e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
147.2943
147.2943
4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Total
0.0709
0.0462
0.5284
1.4800e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
147.2943
147.2943
4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
1.9853
1.9853
1.8265
1.8265
0.0000
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230
0.0000
6,007.043
4 6,007.043
4 1.9428
6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0709
0.0462
0.5284
1.4800e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
147.2943
147.2943
4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Total
0.0709
0.0462
0.5284
1.4800e-
003
0.1521
1.2700e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
003
0.0415
147.2943
147.2943
4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
1.6349
1.6349
1.5041
1.5041
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0665
0.0416
0.4861
1.4300e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
142.1207
142.1207
4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Total
0.0665
0.0416
0.4861
1.4300e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
142.1207
142.1207
4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
8.6733
0.0000
8.6733
3.5965
0.0000
3.5965
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
1.6349
1.6349
1.5041
1.5041
0.0000
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006
0.0000
6,011.410
5 6,011.410
5 1.9442
6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0665
0.0416
0.4861
1.4300e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
142.1207
142.1207
4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Total
0.0665
0.0416
0.4861
1.4300e-
003
0.1521
1.2300e-
003
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
003
0.0415
142.1207
142.1207
4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.4284
13.1673
3.8005
0.0354
0.9155
0.0256
0.9412
0.2636
0.0245
0.2881
3,789.075
0 3,789.075
0 0.2381
3,795.028
3 Worker
2.6620
1.6677
19.4699
0.0571
6.0932
0.0493
6.1425
1.6163
0.0454
1.6617
5,691.935
4 5,691.935
4 0.1602
5,695.940
8 Total
3.0904
14.8350
23.2704
0.0926
7.0087
0.0749
7.0836
1.8799
0.0699
1.9498
9,481.010
4 9,481.010
4 0.3984
9,490.969
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
6 2,554.333
6 0.6120
2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.4284
13.1673
3.8005
0.0354
0.9155
0.0256
0.9412
0.2636
0.0245
0.2881
3,789.075
0 3,789.075
0 0.2381
3,795.028
3 Worker
2.6620
1.6677
19.4699
0.0571
6.0932
0.0493
6.1425
1.6163
0.0454
1.6617
5,691.935
4 5,691.935
4 0.1602
5,695.940
8 Total
3.0904
14.8350
23.2704
0.0926
7.0087
0.0749
7.0836
1.8799
0.0699
1.9498
9,481.010
4 9,481.010
4 0.3984
9,490.969
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.3183
9.9726
3.3771
0.0343
0.9156
0.0122
0.9277
0.2636
0.0116
0.2752
3,671.400
7 3,671.400
7 0.2096
3,676.641
7 Worker
2.5029
1.5073
17.8820
0.0550
6.0932
0.0479
6.1411
1.6163
0.0441
1.6604
5,483.797
4 5,483.797
4 0.1442
5,487.402
0 Total
2.8211
11.4799
21.2591
0.0893
7.0088
0.0601
7.0688
1.8799
0.0557
1.9356
9,155.198
1 9,155.198
1 0.3538
9,164.043
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
0.0000
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
0.0000
2,555.209
9 2,555.209
9 0.6079
2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.3183
9.9726
3.3771
0.0343
0.9156
0.0122
0.9277
0.2636
0.0116
0.2752
3,671.400
7 3,671.400
7 0.2096
3,676.641
7 Worker
2.5029
1.5073
17.8820
0.0550
6.0932
0.0479
6.1411
1.6163
0.0441
1.6604
5,483.797
4 5,483.797
4 0.1442
5,487.402
0 Total
2.8211
11.4799
21.2591
0.0893
7.0088
0.0601
7.0688
1.8799
0.0557
1.9356
9,155.198
1 9,155.198
1 0.3538
9,164.043
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0469
0.0282
0.3349
1.0300e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
102.6928
102.6928
2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Total
0.0469
0.0282
0.3349
1.0300e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
102.6928
102.6928
2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
1 2,207.584
1 0.7140
2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0469
0.0282
0.3349
1.0300e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
102.6928
102.6928
2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Total
0.0469
0.0282
0.3349
1.0300e-
003
0.1141
9.0000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
004
0.0311
102.6928
102.6928
2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.0000e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.4700e-
003
99.5663
Total
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.0000e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.4700e-
003
99.5663
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
0.0000
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
0.0000
2,207.547
2 2,207.547
2 0.7140
2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.0000e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.4700e-
003
99.5663
Total
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.0000e-
003
0.1141
8.8000e-
004
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
004
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.4700e-
003
99.5663
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating
236.4115
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.1808
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.4734
0.2743
3.3220
0.0107
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264
1,062.041
0 Total
0.4734
0.2743
3.3220
0.0107
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264
1,062.041
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating
236.4115
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.1808
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
003
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.4734
0.2743
3.3220
0.0107
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264
1,062.041
0 Total
0.4734
0.2743
3.3220
0.0107
1.2171
9.4300e-
003
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
003
0.3315
1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264
1,062.041
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
9.5233
45.9914
110.0422
0.4681
45.9592
0.3373
46.2965
12.2950
0.3132
12.6083
47,917.80
05 47,917.80
05 2.1953
47,972.68
39 Unmitigated
9.5233
45.9914
110.0422
0.4681
45.9592
0.3373
46.2965
12.2950
0.3132
12.6083
47,917.80
05 47,917.80
05 2.1953
47,972.68
39 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
145.75
154.25
154.00
506,227
506,227
Apartments Mid Rise
4,026.75
3,773.25
4075.50
13,660,065
13,660,065
General Office Building
288.45
62.55 31.05
706,812
706,812
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
2,368.80
2,873.52
2817.72
3,413,937
3,413,937
Hotel
192.00
187.50
160.00
445,703
445,703
Quality Restaurant
501.12
511.92
461.20
707,488
707,488
Regional Shopping Center
528.08
601.44
357.84
1,112,221
1,112,221
Total
8,050.95
8,164.43
8,057.31
20,552,452
20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Apartments Low Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 Apartments Mid Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 General Office Building
16.60 8.40
6.90 33.00
48.00 19.00
77 19
4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40
6.90 8.50
72.50 19.00
37 20
43 Hotel
16.60 8.40
6.90 19.40
61.60 19.00
58 38
4 Quality Restaurant
16.60 8.40
6.90 12.00
69.00 19.00
38 18
44 Regional Shopping Center
16.60 8.40
6.90 16.30
64.70 19.00
54 35
11 5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Low Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Apartments Mid Rise
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
General Office Building
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Hotel
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Quality Restaurant
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Regional Shopping Center
0.543088
0.044216
0.209971
0.116369
0.014033
0.006332
0.021166
0.033577
0.002613
0.001817
0.005285
0.000712
0.000821
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.7660
6.7462
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16
0.0121
0.1031
0.0439
6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662
131.6662
2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3
0.3859
3.2978
1.4033
0.0211
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
4,209.916
4 4,209.916
4 0.0807
0.0772
4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42
0.0138
0.1258
0.1057
7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911
150.9911
2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9
0.2455
2.2314
1.8743
0.0134
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
2,677.634
2 2,677.634
2 0.0513
0.0491
2,693.546
0 Hotel
4769.72
0.0514
0.4676
0.3928
2.8100e-
003
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
561.1436
561.1436
0.0108
0.0103
564.4782
Quality
Restaurant
5057.75
0.0545
0.4959
0.4165
2.9800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
595.0298
595.0298
0.0114
0.0109
598.5658
Regional
Shopping Center
251.616
2.7100e-
003
0.0247
0.0207
1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019
29.6019
5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1.11916
0.0121
0.1031
0.0439
6.6000e-
004
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
8.3400e-
003
131.6662
131.6662
2.5200e-
003
2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35.7843
0.3859
3.2978
1.4033
0.0211
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
0.2666
4,209.916
4 4,209.916
4 0.0807
0.0772
4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1.28342
0.0138
0.1258
0.1057
7.5000e-
004
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
9.5600e-
003
150.9911
150.9911
2.8900e-
003
2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22.7599
0.2455
2.2314
1.8743
0.0134
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
0.1696
2,677.634
2 2,677.634
2 0.0513
0.0491
2,693.546
0 Hotel
4.76972
0.0514
0.4676
0.3928
2.8100e-
003
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
0.0355
561.1436
561.1436
0.0108
0.0103
564.4782
Quality
Restaurant
5.05775
0.0545
0.4959
0.4165
2.9800e-
003
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
0.0377
595.0298
595.0298
0.0114
0.0109
598.5658
Regional
Shopping Center
0.251616
2.7100e-
003
0.0247
0.0207
1.5000e-
004
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
1.8700e-
003
29.6019
29.6019
5.7000e-
004
5.4000e-
004
29.7778
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
2 8,355.983
2 0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
1.6500
14.1000
6.0000
0.0900
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
0.0000
18,000.00
00 18,000.00
00 0.3450
0.3300
18,106.96
50 Landscaping
2.4766
0.9496
82.4430
4.3600e-
003
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
148.5950
148.5950
0.1424
152.1542
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
8.0 Waste Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
1.6500
14.1000
6.0000
0.0900
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
1.1400
0.0000
18,000.00
00 18,000.00
00 0.3450
0.3300
18,106.96
50 Landscaping
2.4766
0.9496
82.4430
4.3600e-
003
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
0.4574
148.5950
148.5950
0.1424
152.1542
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
50 18,148.59
50 0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
92 Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,623
Amortized (MT CO2e/year) 120.77
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,024
Amortized (MT CO2e/year) 100.80
% Decrease in Construction-related GHG Emissions 17%
Local Hire Provision Net Change
With Local Hire Provision
Without Local Hire Provision
Attachment C
EXHIBIT B
62,/:$7(5$,53527(&7,21(17(535,6(
WK6WUHHW6XLWH
6DQWD0RQLFD&DOLIRUQLD
$WWQ
3DXO5RVHQIHOG3K'
0RELO
2IILFH
)D[
(PDLO
SURVHQIHOG#VZDSHFRP
3DXO(5RVHQIHOG3K' 3DJH RI -XQH
3DXO5RVHQIHOG3K' &KHPLFDO)DWHDQG7UDQVSRUW $LU'LVSHUVLRQ0RGHOLQJ Principal Environmental Chemist 5LVN$VVHVVPHQW 5HPHGLDWLRQ6SHFLDOLVW
(GXFDWLRQ
3K'6RLO&KHPLVWU\8QLYHUVLW\RI:DVKLQJWRQ
'LVVHUWDWLRQRQYRODWLOHRUJDQLFFRPSRXQGILOWUDWLRQ 06(QYLURQPHQWDO6FLHQFH8&%HUNHOH\
7KHVLVRQRUJDQLFZDVWHHFRQRPLFV
%$(QYLURQPHQWDO6WXGLHV8&6DQWD%DUEDUD
7KHVLVRQZDVWHZDWHUWUHDWPHQW
3URIHVVLRQDO([SHULHQFH
'U 5RVHQIHOG KDV RYHU \HDUV¶ H[SHULHQFH FRQGXFWLQJ HQYLURQPHQWDO LQYHVWLJDWLRQV DQG ULVN DVVHVVPHQWV IRU HYDOXDWLQJ LPSDFWV WR KXPDQ KHDOWK SURSHUW\ DQG HFRORJLFDO UHFHSWRUV +LV H[SHUWLVH IRFXVHV RQ WKH IDWH DQG WUDQVSRUW RI HQYLURQPHQWDO FRQWDPLQDQWV KXPDQ KHDOWK ULVN H[SRVXUH DVVHVVPHQW DQG HFRORJLFDO UHVWRUDWLRQ 'U 5RVHQIHOG KDV HYDOXDWHG DQG PRGHOHG HPLVVLRQV IURP XQFRQYHQWLRQDO RLO GULOOLQJ RSHUDWLRQV RLO VSLOOV ODQGILOOV ERLOHUVDQGLQFLQHUDWRUVSURFHVVVWDFNVVWRUDJHWDQNVFRQILQHGDQLPDOIHHGLQJRSHUDWLRQVDQGPDQ\RWKHULQGXVWULDO DQG DJULFXOWXUDO VRXUFHV +LV SURMHFW H[SHULHQFH UDQJHV IURP PRQLWRULQJ DQG PRGHOLQJ RI SROOXWLRQ VRXUFHV WR HYDOXDWLQJLPSDFWVRISROOXWLRQRQZRUNHUVDWLQGXVWULDOIDFLOLWLHVDQGUHVLGHQWVLQVXUURXQGLQJFRPPXQLWLHV
'U 5RVHQIHOG KDV LQYHVWLJDWHG DQG GHVLJQHG UHPHGLDWLRQ SURJUDPV DQG ULVN DVVHVVPHQWV IRU FRQWDPLQDWHG VLWHV FRQWDLQLQJ OHDG KHDY\ PHWDOV PROG EDFWHULD SDUWLFXODWH PDWWHU SHWUROHXP K\GURFDUERQV FKORULQDWHG VROYHQWV SHVWLFLGHVUDGLRDFWLYHZDVWHGLR[LQVDQGIXUDQVVHPLDQGYRODWLOHRUJDQLFFRPSRXQGV3&%V3$+VSHUFKORUDWH DVEHVWRVSHUDQGSRO\IOXRURDON\OVXEVWDQFHV
3)2$3)26
XQXVXDOSRO\PHUVIXHOR[\JHQDWHV
07%(
DPRQJ
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
3DXO(5RVHQIHOG3K' 3DJH RI -XQH
3URIHVVLRQDO+LVWRU\
6RLO:DWHU$LU3URWHFWLRQ(QWHUSULVH
6:$3(
WRSUHVHQW
3ULQFLSDODQG)RXQGLQJ3DUWQHU
8&/$6FKRRORI3XEOLF+HDOWK
WR
/HFWXUHU
$VVLVWDQW5HVHDUFKHU
8&/$6FKRRORI3XEOLF+HDOWK
WR
$GMXQFW3URIHVVRU
8&/$(QYLURQPHQWDO6FLHQFHDQG(QJLQHHULQJ3URJUDP
'RFWRUDO,QWHUQ&RRUGLQDWRU
8&/$,QVWLWXWHRIWKH(QYLURQPHQW
5HVHDUFK$VVRFLDWH
.RPH[+26FLHQFHWR
6HQLRU5HPHGLDWLRQ6FLHQWLVW
1DWLRQDO*URXQGZDWHU$VVRFLDWLRQ
/HFWXUHU
6DQ'LHJR6WDWH8QLYHUVLW\
$GMXQFW3URIHVVRU
$QWHRQ&RUS6DQ'LHJR
5HPHGLDWLRQ3URMHFW0DQDJHU
2JGHQ
QRZ$PHF
6DQ'LHJR
5HPHGLDWLRQ3URMHFW0DQDJHU
%HFKWHO6DQ'LHJR&DOLIRUQLD
±
5LVN$VVHVVRU
.LQJ&RXQW\6HDWWOH
±
6FLHQWLVW
-DPHV5LYHU&RUS:DVKLQJWRQ
6FLHQWLVW
%LJ&UHHN/XPEHU'DYHQSRUW&DOLIRUQLD
6FLHQWLVW
3OXPDV&RUS&DOLIRUQLDDQG86)67DKRH
6FLHQWLVW
3HDFH&RUSVDQG:RUOG:LOGOLIH)XQG6W.LWWV:HVW,QGLHV
6FLHQWLVW
3XEOLFDWLRQV
5HP\//&OD\7%\HUV95RVHQIHOG3(
+RVSLWDO+HDOWKDQG&RPPXQLW\%XUGHQ$IWHU2LO
5HILQHU\)LUHV5LFKPRQG&DOLIRUQLDDQGEnvironmental Health.
6LPRQV5$6HR<5RVHQIHOG3
0RGHOLQJWKH(IIHFWRI5HILQHU\(PLVVLRQ2Q5HVLGHQWLDO3URSHUW\ 9DOXH-RXUQDORI5HDO(VWDWH5HVHDUFK
&KHQ-$=DSDWD$56XWKHUODQG$-0ROPHQ'5&KRZ%6:X/(5RVHQIHOG3(+HVVH5&
6XOIXU'LR[LGHDQG9RODWLOH2UJDQLF&RPSRXQG([SRVXUH7R$&RPPXQLW\,Q7H[DV&LW\7H[DV(YDOXDWHG 8VLQJ$HUPRGDQG(PSLULFDO'DWDAmerican Journal of Environmental Science
5RVHQIHOG3( )HQJ/
The Risks of Hazardous Waste.$PVWHUGDP
(OVHYLHU3XEOLVKLQJ
&KHUHPLVLQRII 13 5RVHQIHOG 3(
Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry$PVWHUGDP
(OVHYLHU3XEOLVKLQJ
*RQ]DOH] - )HQJ / 6XWKHUODQG $ :DOOHU & 6RN + +HVVH 55RVHQIHOG 3
3&%V DQG
'LR[LQV)XUDQVLQ$WWLF'XVW&ROOHFWHG1HDU)RUPHU3&%3URGXFWLRQDQG6HFRQGDU\&RSSHU)DFLOLWLHVLQ6DXJHW,/ Procedia Environmental Sciences±
)HQJ/:X&7DP/6XWKHUODQG$-&ODUN--5RVHQIHOG3(
'LR[LQDQG)XUDQ%ORRG/LSLGDQG
$WWLF'XVW&RQFHQWUDWLRQVLQ3RSXODWLRQV/LYLQJ1HDU)RXU:RRG7UHDWPHQW)DFLOLWLHVLQWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVJournal of Environmental Health
&KHUHPLVLQRII 13 5RVHQIHOG 3(
Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries.$PVWHUGDP
(OVHYLHU3XEOLVKLQJ
&KHUHPLVLQRII 13 5RVHQIHOG 3(
Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry$PVWHUGDP
(OVHYLHU3XEOLVKLQJ
:X&7DP/&ODUN-5RVHQIHOG3
'LR[LQDQGIXUDQEORRGOLSLGFRQFHQWUDWLRQVLQSRSXODWLRQVOLYLQJ QHDU IRXU ZRRG WUHDWPHQW IDFLOLWLHV LQ WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHVWIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution,
3DXO(5RVHQIHOG3K' 3DJH RI -XQH
7DP/.:X&'&ODUN--DQG5RVHQIHOG3(
$6WDWLVWLFDO$QDO\VLV2I$WWLF'XVW$QG%ORRG/LSLG &RQFHQWUDWLRQV 2I 7HWUDFKORURS'LEHQ]RGLR[LQ
7&''
7R[LFLW\ (TXLYDOHQF\ 4XRWLHQWV
7(4
,Q 7ZR
3RSXODWLRQV1HDU:RRG7UHDWPHQW)DFLOLWLHVOrganohalogen Compounds
7DP/.:X&'&ODUN--DQG5RVHQIHOG3(
0HWKRGV)RU&ROOHFW6DPSOHV)RU$VVHVVLQJ'LR[LQV
$QG 2WKHU (QYLURQPHQWDO &RQWDPLQDQWV ,Q $WWLF 'XVW $ 5HYLHZOrganohalogen Compounds
+HQVOH\$5$6FRWW---&ODUN5RVHQIHOG3(
$WWLF'XVWDQG+XPDQ%ORRG6DPSOHV&ROOHFWHGQHDU
D)RUPHU:RRG7UHDWPHQW)DFLOLW\Environmental Research
5RVHQIHOG 3(- - - &ODUN $ 5 +HQVOH\ 0 6XIIHW
7KH 8VH RI DQ 2GRU :KHHO &ODVVLILFDWLRQ IRU
(YDOXDWLRQRI+XPDQ+HDOWK5LVN&ULWHULDIRU&RPSRVW)DFLOLWLHVWater Science & Technology
5RVHQIHOG3(06XIIHW
7KH$QDWRP\2I2GRXU:KHHOV)RU2GRXUV2I'ULQNLQJ:DWHU:DVWHZDWHU &RPSRVW$QG7KH8UEDQ(QYLURQPHQWWater Science & Technology
6XOOLYDQ 3 - &ODUN --- $JDUG\ ) -5RVHQIHOG 3(
Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food,
Water, and Air in American Cities.%RVWRQ0DVVDFKXVHWWV (OVHYLHU3XEOLVKLQJ
5RVHQIHOG3(DQG6XIIHW,+
&RQWURORI&RPSRVW2GRU8VLQJ+LJK&DUERQ:RRG$VKWater Science and Technology
5RVHQIHOG3(--&ODUN,+
0HO
6XIIHW
7KH9DOXHRI$Q2GRU4XDOLW\:KHHO&ODVVLILFDWLRQ6FKHPH )RU 7KH 8UEDQ (QYLURQPHQWWater Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004.1HZ2UOHDQV2FWREHU
5RVHQIHOG 3( DQG 6XIIHW ,+
8QGHUVWDQGLQJ 2GRUDQWV $VVRFLDWHG :LWK &RPSRVW %LRPDVV )DFLOLWLHV DQGWKH/DQG$SSOLFDWLRQRI%LRVROLGVWater Science and Technology
5RVHQIHOG3(DQG6XIIHW,+
&RQWURORI&RPSRVW2GRU8VLQJ+LJK&DUERQ:RRG$VKWater Science and Technology
5RVHQIHOG 3 ( *UH\ 0 $ 6HOOHZ 3
0HDVXUHPHQW RI %LRVROLGV 2GRU DQG 2GRUDQW (PLVVLRQV IURP :LQGURZV6WDWLF3LOHDQG%LRILOWHUWater Environment Research
5RVHQIHOG 3( *UH\ 0 DQG 6XIIHW 0
&RPSRVW 'HPRQVWUDWLRQ 3URMHFW 6DFUDPHQWR &DOLIRUQLD 8VLQJ +LJK&DUERQ:RRG$VKWR&RQWURO2GRUDWD*UHHQ0DWHULDOV&RPSRVWLQJ)DFLOLW\Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office3XEOLFDWLRQV&OHDULQJKRXVH 06±
6DFUDPHQWR&$3XEOLFDWLRQ
5RVHQIHOG3(DQG&/+HQU\
&KDUDFWHUL]DWLRQRIRGRUHPLVVLRQVIURPWKUHHGLIIHUHQWELRVROLGVWater Soil and Air Pollution
5RVHQIHOG3(DQG+HQU\&/
:RRGDVKFRQWURORIRGRUHPLVVLRQVIURPELRVROLGVDSSOLFDWLRQJournal of Environmental Quality.
5RVHQIHOG 3( &/ +HQU\ DQG ' %HQQHWW
:DVWHZDWHU GHZDWHULQJ SRO\PHU DIIHFW RQ ELRVROLGV RGRU HPLVVLRQVDQGPLFURELDODFWLYLW\Water Environment Research
5RVHQIHOG3(DQG&/+HQU\
$FWLYDWHG&DUERQDQG:RRG$VK6RUSWLRQRI:DVWHZDWHU&RPSRVWDQG %LRVROLGV2GRUDQWVWater Environment Research
5RVHQIHOG 3( DQG +HQU\ & /
+LJK FDUERQ ZRRG DVK HIIHFW RQ ELRVROLGV PLFURELDO DFWLYLW\ DQG RGRU Water Environment Research
3DXO(5RVHQIHOG3K' 3DJH RI -XQH
&KROODFN 7 DQG3 5RVHQIHOG
&RPSRVW $PHQGPHQW +DQGERRN )RU /DQGVFDSLQJ 3UHSDUHG IRU DQG GLVWULEXWHGE\WKH&LW\RI5HGPRQG:DVKLQJWRQ6WDWH
5RVHQIHOG3(
7KH0RXQW/LDPXLJD&UDWHU7UDLOHeritage Magazine of St. Kitts
5RVHQIHOG 3 (
+LJK 6FKRRO %LRJDV 3URMHFW WR 3UHYHQW 'HIRUHVWDWLRQ 2Q 6W .LWWV Biomass Users Network
5RVHQIHOG 3 (
&KDUDFWHUL]DWLRQ 4XDQWLILFDWLRQ DQG &RQWURO RI 2GRU (PLVVLRQV )URP %LRVROLGV $SSOLFDWLRQ7R)RUHVW6RLO'RFWRUDO7KHVLV8QLYHUVLW\RI:DVKLQJWRQ&ROOHJHRI)RUHVW5HVRXUFHV
5RVHQIHOG 3 (
3RWHQWLDO 8WLOL]DWLRQ RI 6PDOO 'LDPHWHU 7UHHV RQ 6LHUUD &RXQW\ 3XEOLF /DQG 0DVWHUV WKHVLVUHSULQWHGE\WKH6LHUUD&RXQW\(FRQRPLF&RXQFLO6LHUUD&RXQW\&DOLIRUQLD
5RVHQIHOG3(
+RZWR%XLOGD6PDOO5XUDO$QDHURELF'LJHVWHU 8VHV2I%LRJDV,Q7KH)LUVW$QG7KLUG :RUOG%DFKHORUV7KHVLV8QLYHUVLW\RI&DOLIRUQLD
3UHVHQWDWLRQV
5RVHQIHOG 3( 6XWKHUODQG $
+HVVH 5
=DSDWD $
2FWREHU
$LU GLVSHUVLRQ PRGHOLQJ RI YRODWLOH
RUJDQLF HPLVVLRQV IURP PXOWLSOH QDWXUDO JDV ZHOOV LQ 'HFDWXU 7;44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. /HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP6DQWD&ODUD&$
6RN +/
:DOOHU &&
)HQJ /
*RQ]DOH] -
6XWKHUODQG $-
:LVGRP6WDFN 7
6DKDL 5.
+HVVH 5&
5RVHQIHOG 3(
-XQH
$WUD]LQH
$ 3HUVLVWHQW 3HVWLFLGH LQ 8UEDQ'ULQNLQJ :DWHU.
Urban Environmental Pollution/HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP%RVWRQ0$
)HQJ /
*RQ]DOH] -
6RN +/
6XWKHUODQG $-
:DOOHU &&
:LVGRP6WDFN 7
6DKDL 5.
/D 0
+HVVH
5&
5RVHQIHOG 3(
-XQH
%ULQJLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO -XVWLFH WR (DVW 6W /RXLV ,OOLQRLVUrban Environmental Pollution. /HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP%RVWRQ0$
5RVHQIHOG 3(
$SULO
3HUIOXRURFWDQRLF $FLG
3)2$
DQG 3HUIOXRURDFWDQH 6XOIRQDWH
3)26
&RQWDPLQDWLRQLQ'ULQNLQJ:DWHU)URPWKH8VHRI$TXHRXV)LOP)RUPLQJ)RDPV $)))
DW$LUSRUWVLQWKH8QLWHG
6WDWHV2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting/HFWXUHFRQGXFWHG IURP7XVFRQ$=
5RVHQIHOG 3(
$SULO
&RVW WR )LOWHU $WUD]LQH &RQWDPLQDWLRQ IURP 'ULQNLQJ :DWHU LQ WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV´&RQWDPLQDWLRQLQ'ULQNLQJ:DWHU)URPWKH8VHRI$TXHRXV)LOP)RUPLQJ)RDPV $)))
DW$LUSRUWVLQWKH
8QLWHG 6WDWHV2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting /HFWXUH FRQGXFWHGIURP7XVFRQ$=
:X & 7DP / &ODUN -5RVHQIHOG 3
-XO\
'LR[LQ DQG IXUDQ EORRG OLSLG FRQFHQWUDWLRQV LQ SRSXODWLRQVOLYLQJQHDU IRXU ZRRGWUHDWPHQW IDFLOLWLHVLQWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV%UHEELD&$DQG3RSRY9HGVAir Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution/HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP7DOOLQQ(VWRQLD
5RVHQIHOG 3 (
2FWREHU
0RVV 3RLQW &RPPXQLW\ ([SRVXUH 7R &RQWDPLQDQWV )URP $ 5HOHDVLQJ )DFLOLW\The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water.3ODWIRUPOHFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP 8QLYHUVLW\RI0DVVDFKXVHWWV$PKHUVW0$
5RVHQIHOG 3 (
2FWREHU
7KH 5HSHDWHG 7UHVSDVV RI 7ULWLXP&RQWDPLQDWHG :DWHU ,QWR $ 6XUURXQGLQJ&RPPXQLW\)RUP5HSHDWHG:DVWH6SLOOV)URP$1XFOHDU3RZHU3ODQW. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water3ODWIRUPOHFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP8QLYHUVLW\RI0DVVDFKXVHWWV$PKHUVW 0$
3DXO(5RVHQIHOG3K' 3DJH RI -XQH
5RVHQIHOG3(
2FWREHU
6RPHUYLOOH&RPPXQLW\([SRVXUH7R&RQWDPLQDQWV)URP:RRG7UHDWPHQW )DFLOLW\ (PLVVLRQV 7KH23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water /HFWXUH FRQGXFWHG IURP8QLYHUVLW\RI0DVVDFKXVHWWV$PKHUVW0$
5RVHQIHOG3(
0DUFK
3URGXFWLRQ&KHPLFDO3URSHUWLHV7R[LFRORJ\ 7UHDWPHQW&DVH6WXGLHVRI 7ULFKORURSURSDQH
7&3
The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting/HFWXUH FRQGXFWHGIURP6DQ'LHJR&$
5RVHQIHOG3(
0DUFK
%ORRGDQG$WWLF6DPSOLQJIRU'LR[LQ)XUDQ3$+DQG0HWDO([SRVXUHLQ)ORUDOD $ODEDPDThe AEHS Annual Meeting. /HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP6DQ'LHJR&$
+HQVOH\$56FRWW$5RVHQIHOG3(&ODUN--- $XJXVW±
'LR[LQ&RQWDLQLQJ$WWLF'XVW$QG
+XPDQ%ORRG6DPSOHV&ROOHFWHG1HDU$)RUPHU:RRG7UHDWPHQW)DFLOLW\The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006 /HFWXUH FRQGXFWHG IURP 5DGLVVRQ 6$6 6FDQGLQDYLD +RWHOLQ2VOR1RUZD\
+HQVOH\ $5 6FRWW $5RVHQIHOG 3( &ODUN --- 1RYHPEHU
'LR[LQ &RQWDLQLQJ $WWLF 'XVW $QG
+XPDQ %ORRG 6DPSOHV &ROOHFWHG 1HDU $ )RUPHU :RRG 7UHDWPHQW )DFLOLW\. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. /HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP%RVWRQ0DVVDFKXVHWWV
3DXO 5RVHQIHOG 3K'
2FWREHU
)DWH 7UDQVSRUW DQG 3HUVLVWHQFH RI 3)2$ DQG 5HODWHG &KHPLFDOV 0HDOH\¶V &3)2$Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. /HFWXUH FRQGXFWHG IURP 7KH 5LWWHQKRXVH +RWHO 3KLODGHOSKLD3$
3DXO5RVHQIHOG3K'
6HSWHPEHU
%URPLQDWHG )ODPH5HWDUGDQWV LQ*URXQGZDWHU
3DWKZD\VWR +XPDQ
,QJHVWLRQToxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference/HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP+LOWRQ +RWHO,UYLQH&DOLIRUQLD
3DXO 5RVHQIHOG 3K'
6HSWHPEHU
)DWH 7UDQVSRUW 7R[LFLW\ $QG 3HUVLVWHQFH RI 7&3PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. /HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP+LOWRQ+RWHOLQ,UYLQH&DOLIRUQLD
3DXO5RVHQIHOG3K'
6HSWHPEHU
)DWH7UDQVSRUWDQG3HUVLVWHQFHRI3'%(VMealey’s Groundwater Conference./HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP5LW]&DUOWRQ+RWHO0DULQD'HO5D\&DOLIRUQLD
3DXO 5RVHQIHOG 3K'
-XQH
)DWH 7UDQVSRUW DQG 3HUVLVWHQFH RI 3)2$ DQG 5HODWHG &KHPLFDOV International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants /HFWXUH FRQGXFWHG IURP 6KHUDWRQ2FHDQIURQW+RWHO9LUJLQLD%HDFK9LUJLQLD
3DXO 5RVHQIHOG 3K'
-XO\
)DWH 7UDQVSRUW 3HUVLVWHQFH DQG 7R[LFRORJ\ RI 3)2$ DQG 5HODWHG 3HUIOXRURFKHPLFDOV2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference /HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP:\QGKDP%DOWLPRUH,QQHU+DUERU%DOWLPRUH0DU\ODQG
3DXO 5RVHQIHOG 3K'
-XO\
%URPLQDWHG )ODPH 5HWDUGDQWV LQ *URXQGZDWHU
3DWKZD\V WR +XPDQ
,QJHVWLRQ 7R[LFRORJ\ DQG 5HPHGLDWLRQ 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. /HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP:\QGKDP%DOWLPRUH,QQHU+DUERU%DOWLPRUH0DU\ODQG
3DXO5RVHQIHOG3K'DQG-DPHV&ODUN3K'DQG5RE+HVVH5* 0D\
7HUWEXW\O$OFRKRO/LDELOLW\
DQG7R[LFRORJ\$1DWLRQDO3UREOHPDQG8QTXDQWLILHG/LDELOLW\National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference/HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP&RQJUHVV3OD]D+RWHO&KLFDJR,OOLQRLV
3DXO 5RVHQIHOG 3K'
0DUFK
3HUFKORUDWH 7R[LFRORJ\Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust /HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP3KRHQL[$UL]RQD
+DJHPDQQ0)3DXO5RVHQIHOG3K'DQG5RE+HVVH
3HUFKORUDWH&RQWDPLQDWLRQRIWKH&RORUDGR5LYHU
Meeting of tribal representatives/HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP3DUNHU$=
3DXO(5RVHQIHOG3K' 3DJH RI -XQH
3DXO 5RVHQIHOG 3K'
$SULO
$ 1DWLRQDO 'DPDJH $VVHVVPHQW 0RGHO )RU 3&( DQG 'U\ &OHDQHUV Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association/HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP5DGLVRQ+RWHO6DFUDPHQWR &DOLIRUQLD
5RVHQIHOG 3 ( *UH\ 0
-XQH
7ZR VWDJH ELRILOWHU IRU ELRVROLGV FRPSRVWLQJ RGRU FRQWUROSeventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation SymposiumBattelle Conference2UODQGR)/
3DXO 5RVHQIHOG 3K' DQG -DPHV &ODUN 3K'
)HEUXDU\
8QGHUVWDQGLQJ +LVWRULFDO 8VH &KHPLFDO
3URSHUWLHV7R[LFLW\DQG5HJXODWRU\*XLGDQFHRI'LR[DQHNational Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants/HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP+\DWW5HJHQF\3KRHQL[$UL]RQD
3DXO 5RVHQIHOG 3K'
)HEUXDU\
8QGHUJURXQG 6WRUDJH 7DQN /LWLJDWLRQ DQG 5HPHGLDWLRQCalifornia CUPA Forum/HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP0DUULRWW+RWHO$QDKHLP&DOLIRUQLD
3DXO 5RVHQIHOG 3K'
2FWREHU
8QGHUJURXQG 6WRUDJH 7DQN /LWLJDWLRQ DQG 5HPHGLDWLRQEPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable/HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP6DFUDPHQWR&DOLIRUQLD
5RVHQIHOG 3( DQG 6XIIHW 0
2FWREHU
8QGHUVWDQGLQJ 2GRU IURP &RPSRVWWastewater and
Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association/HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP%DUFHORQD6SDLQ
5RVHQIHOG3(DQG6XIIHW0
2FWREHU
8VLQJ+LJK&DUERQ:RRG$VKWR&RQWURO&RPSRVW2GRU
Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association /HFWXUH FRQGXFWHGIURP%DUFHORQD6SDLQ
5RVHQIHOG 3( DQG *UH\ 0 $
6HSWHPEHU
%LRF\FOH &RPSRVWLQJ )RU &RDVWDO 6DJH 5HVWRUDWLRQ Northwest Biosolids Management Association/HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP9DQFRXYHU:DVKLQJWRQ
5RVHQIHOG3(DQG*UH\0$
1RYHPEHU
8VLQJ+LJK&DUERQ:RRG$VKWR&RQWURO2GRUDWD
*UHHQ0DWHULDOV&RPSRVWLQJ)DFLOLW\Soil Science Society Annual ConferencH/HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP ,QGLDQDSROLV0DU\ODQG
5RVHQIHOG 3(
6HSWHPEHU
7ZR VWDJH ELRILOWHU IRU ELRVROLGV FRPSRVWLQJ RGRU FRQWUROWater Environment Federation./HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP$QDKHLP&DOLIRUQLD
5RVHQIHOG 3(
2FWREHU
:RRG DVK DQG ELRILOWHU FRQWURO RI FRPSRVW RGRUBiofest. /HFWXUH FRQGXFWHG IURP2FHDQ6KRUHV&DOLIRUQLD
5RVHQIHOG 3(
%LRUHPHGLDWLRQ 8VLQJ 2UJDQLF 6RLO $PHQGPHQWVCalifornia Resource Recovery Association/HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP6DFUDPHQWR&DOLIRUQLD
5RVHQIHOG 3( &/ +HQU\ 5 +DUULVRQ
2DW DQG *UDVV 6HHG *HUPLQDWLRQ DQG 1LWURJHQ DQG 6XOIXU (PLVVLRQV )ROORZLQJ %LRVROLGV ,QFRUSRUDWLRQ :LWK +LJK&DUERQ :RRG$VKWater Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings /HFWXUH FRQGXFWHG IURP %HOOHYXH :DVKLQJWRQ
5RVHQIHOG3(DQG&/+HQU\
$QHYDOXDWLRQRIDVKLQFRUSRUDWLRQZLWKELRVROLGVIRURGRUUHGXFWLRQSoil Science Society of America/HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP6DOW/DNH&LW\8WDK
5RVHQIHOG 3( &/ +HQU\ 5 +DUULVRQ
&RPSDULVRQ RI 0LFURELDO $FWLYLW\ DQG 2GRU (PLVVLRQV IURP 7KUHH'LIIHUHQW%LRVROLGV$SSOLHGWR)RUHVW6RLOBrown and Caldwell. /HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP6HDWWOH:DVKLQJWRQ
5RVHQIHOG 3( &/ +HQU\
&KDUDFWHUL]DWLRQ 4XDQWLILFDWLRQ DQG &RQWURO RI 2GRU (PLVVLRQV IURP %LRVROLGV$SSOLFDWLRQ7R)RUHVW6RLOBiofest. /HFWXUHFRQGXFWHGIURP /DNH&KHODQ:DVKLQJWRQ
3DXO(5RVHQIHOG3K' 3DJH RI -XQH
5RVHQIHOG 3( &/ +HQU\ 5 +DUULVRQ
2DW DQG *UDVV 6HHG *HUPLQDWLRQ DQG 1LWURJHQ DQG 6XOIXU (PLVVLRQV )ROORZLQJ %LRVROLGV ,QFRUSRUDWLRQ :LWK +LJK&DUERQ :RRG$VK :DWHU (QYLURQPHQW )HGHUDWLRQ WK $QQXDO 5HVLGXDOV DQG %LRVROLGV 0DQDJHPHQW &RQIHUHQFH 3URFHHGLQJV /HFWXUH FRQGXFWHG IURP %HOOHYXH :DVKLQJWRQ
5RVHQIHOG 3( &/ +HQU\ 5 % +DUULVRQ DQG 5 'LOOV
&RPSDULVRQ RI 2GRU (PLVVLRQV )URP 7KUHH
'LIIHUHQW %LRVROLGV $SSOLHG WR )RUHVW 6RLO Soil Science Society of America /HFWXUH FRQGXFWHG IURP $QDKHLP &DOLIRUQLD
7HDFKLQJ([SHULHQFH
8&/$'HSDUWPHQWRI(QYLURQPHQWDO+HDOWK
6XPPHUWKURXJK
7DXJKW(QYLURQPHQWDO+HDOWK6FLHQFH
WR VWXGHQWV LQFOXGLQJ XQGHUJUDG PHGLFDO GRFWRUV SXEOLF KHDOWK SURIHVVLRQDOV DQG QXUVHV &RXUVH IRFXVHG RQ WKHKHDOWKHIIHFWVRIHQYLURQPHQWDOFRQWDPLQDQWV
1DWLRQDO *URXQG :DWHU $VVRFLDWLRQ 6XFFHVVIXO 5HPHGLDWLRQ 7HFKQRORJLHV &XVWRP &RXUVH LQ 6DQWH )H 1HZ 0H[LFR 0D\ )RFXVHG RQ IDWH DQG WUDQVSRUW RI IXHO FRQWDPLQDQWV DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK XQGHUJURXQG VWRUDJH WDQNV
1DWLRQDO *URXQG :DWHU $VVRFLDWLRQ
6XFFHVVIXO 5HPHGLDWLRQ 7HFKQRORJLHV &RXUVH LQ &KLFDJR ,OOLQRLV $SULO )RFXVHGRQIDWHDQGWUDQVSRUWRIFRQWDPLQDQWVDVVRFLDWHGZLWK6XSHUIXQGDQG5&5$VLWHV
&DOLIRUQLD ,QWHJUDWHG :DVWH 0DQDJHPHQW %RDUG $SULO DQG 0D\ $OWHUQDWLYH /DQGILOO &DSV 6HPLQDU LQ 6DQ 'LHJR9HQWXUDDQG6DQ)UDQFLVFR)RFXVHGRQERWKSUHVFULSWLYHDQGLQQRYDWLYHODQGILOOFRYHUGHVLJQ
8&/$ 'HSDUWPHQW RI (QYLURQPHQWDO (QJLQHHULQJ )HEUXDU\ 6HPLQDU RQ 6XFFHVVIXO 5HPHGLDWLRQ 7HFKQRORJLHVIRFXVLQJRQ*URXQGZDWHU5HPHGLDWLRQ
8QLYHUVLW\2I:DVKLQJWRQ6RLO6FLHQFH3URJUDP7HDFKLQJ$VVLVWDQWIRUVHYHUDOFRXUVHVLQFOXGLQJ 6RLO&KHPLVWU\
2UJDQLF6RLO$PHQGPHQWVDQG6RLO6WDELOLW\
8&%HUNHOH\(QYLURQPHQWDO6FLHQFH3URJUDP7HDFKLQJ$VVLVWDQWIRU(QYLURQPHQWDO6FLHQFH
$FDGHPLF*UDQWV$ZDUGHG
&DOLIRUQLD ,QWHJUDWHG :DVWH 0DQDJHPHQW %RDUG JUDQW DZDUGHG WR 8&/$ ,QVWLWXWH RI WKH (QYLURQPHQW *RDO
7RLQYHVWLJDWHHIIHFWRIKLJKFDUERQZRRGDVKRQYRODWLOHRUJDQLFHPLVVLRQVIURPFRPSRVW
6\QDJUR7HFKQRORJLHV&RURQD&DOLIRUQLD
JUDQWDZDUGHGWR6DQ'LHJR6WDWH8QLYHUVLW\ *RDO
LQYHVWLJDWHHIIHFWRIELRVROLGVIRUUHVWRUDWLRQDQGUHPHGLDWLRQRIGHJUDGHGFRDVWDOVDJHVRLOV
.LQJ&RXQW\'HSDUWPHQWRI5HVHDUFKDQG7HFKQRORJ\:DVKLQJWRQ6WDWHJUDQWDZDUGHGWR8QLYHUVLW\RI :DVKLQJWRQ
*RDO
7RLQYHVWLJDWHRGRUHPLVVLRQVIURPELRVROLGVDSSOLFDWLRQDQGWKHHIIHFWRISRO\PHUVDQGDVKRQ 92&HPLVVLRQV
1RUWKZHVW %LRVROLGV 0DQDJHPHQW $VVRFLDWLRQ :DVKLQJWRQ 6WDWH JUDQW DZDUGHG WR LQYHVWLJDWH HIIHFW RI SRO\PHUVDQGDVKRQ92&HPLVVLRQVIURPELRVROLGV
-DPHV5LYHU&RUSRUDWLRQ2UHJRQ
JUDQWZDVDZDUGHGWRLQYHVWLJDWHWKHVXFFHVVRIJHQHWLFDOO\HQJLQHHUHG 3RSODUWUHHVZLWKUHVLVWDQFHWRURXQGXS
8QLWHG6WDWH)RUHVW6HUYLFH7DKRH1DWLRQDO)RUHVW
JUDQWZDVDZDUGHGWRLQYHVWLJDWLQJILUHHFRORJ\RIWKH 7DKRH1DWLRQDO)RUHVW
.HOORJJ)RXQGDWLRQ:DVKLQJWRQ'&JUDQWZDVDZDUGHGWRFRQVWUXFWDODUJHDQDHURELFGLJHVWHURQ6W.LWWV LQ:HVW,QGLHV
3DXO(5RVHQIHOG3K' 3DJH RI -XQH
'HSRVLWLRQDQGRU7ULDO7HVWLPRQ\
,QWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW)RU7KH'LVWULFWRI1HZ-HUVH\ 'XDUWHHWDOPlaintiffs, YV8QLWHG6WDWHV0HWDOV5HILQLQJ&RPSDQ\HWDODefendant. &DVH1R
FY(66&0
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ
,QWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUWRI6RXWKHUQ'LVWULFWRI7H[DV*DOYHVWRQ'LYLVLRQ 07&DUOD0DHUVNPlaintiffs, YV&RQWL6FKLIIDKUWV*0%+ &R%XONHU.*06³&RQWL3HUGLGR´ Defendant.
&DVH1R
&9FRQVROLGDWHGZLWK
&9
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ
,Q7KH6XSHULRU&RXUWRIWKH6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD,Q$QG)RU7KH&RXQW\2I/RV$QJHOHV±6DQWD0RQLFD &DUROH7DGGHR%DWHVHWDOYV,IUDQ.KDQHWDO'HIHQGDQWV &DVH1R
1R%&
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ
,Q7KH6XSHULRU&RXUWRIWKH6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD,Q$QG)RU7KH&RXQW\2I/RV$QJHOHV±6DQWD0RQLFD 7KH6DQ*DEULHO9DOOH\&RXQFLORI*RYHUQPHQWVHWDOYV(O$GREH$SWV,QFHWDO'HIHQGDQWV &DVH1R
1R%&
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ
7ULDO
,Q8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW)RU7KH'LVWULFWRI&RORUDGR %HOOVHWDO3ODLQWLIIYV7KH0&RPSDQ\HWDO'HIHQGDQWV &DVH
1R
FY5%-
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQDQG
,Q7KH'LVWULFW&RXUW2I5HJDQ&RXQW\7H[DVWK-XGLFLDO'LVWULFW 3KLOOLS%DOHVHWDO3ODLQWLIIYV'RZ$JURVFLHQFHV//&HWDO'HIHQGDQWV &DXVH1R
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ
,Q7KH6XSHULRU&RXUWRIWKH6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD,Q$QG)RU7KH&RXQW\2I&RQWUD&RVWD 6LPRQVHWDO3ODLQWLIIVYV&KHYURQ&RUSRUDWLRQHWDO'HIHQGDQWV &DXVH1R&
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ
,Q7KH&LUFXLW&RXUW2I7KH7ZHQWLHWK-XGLFLDO&LUFXLW6W&ODLU&RXQW\,OOLQRLV 0DUWKD&XVWHUHWDO3ODLQWLIIYV&HUUR)ORZ3URGXFWV,QF'HIHQGDQWV &DVH1R
1RL
/
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ
,Q7KH6XSHULRU&RXUWRIWKH6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD)RU7KH&RXQW\RI/RV$QJHOHV :DUUQ*LOEHUWDQG3HQQ\*LOEHU3ODLQWLIIYV%0:RI1RUWK$PHULFD//& &DVH1R
/&
FZ%&
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ7UDLO
,QWKH1RUWKHUQ'LVWULFW&RXUWRI0LVVLVVLSSL*UHHQYLOOH'LYLVLRQ %UHQGD-&RRSHUHWDOPlaintiffs,YV0HULWRU,QFHWDODefendants &DVH1XPEHU
FY'0%-90
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ
-XO\
3DXO(5RVHQIHOG3K' 3DJH
RI -XQH
,Q7KH6XSHULRU&RXUWRIWKH6WDWHRI:DVKLQJWRQ&RXQW\RI6QRKRPLVK 0LFKDHO'DYLVDQG-XOLH'DYLVHWDO3ODLQWLIIYV&HGDU*URYH&RPSRVWLQJ,QF'HIHQGDQWV &DVH1R
1R
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ)HEUXDU\
7ULDO0DUFK
,Q7KH6XSHULRU&RXUWRIWKH6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD&RXQW\RI$ODPHGD &KDUOHV6SDLQ3ODLQWLIIYV7KHUPR)LVKHU6FLHQWLILFHWDO'HIHQGDQWV &DVH1R
5*
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ6HSWHPEHU
,Q7KH,RZD'LVWULFW&RXUW,Q$QG)RU3RZHVKLHN&RXQW\ 5XVVHOO':LQEXUQHWDO3ODLQWLIIVYV'RXJ+RNVEHUJHQHWDO'HIHQGDQWV &DVH1R
/$/$
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ$XJXVW
,Q7KH,RZD'LVWULFW&RXUW)RU:DSHOOR&RXQW\
-HUU\'RYLFRHWDO3ODLQWLIIVYV9DOOH\9LHZ6LQH//&HWDO'HIHQGDQWV /DZ1R
/$/$'LYLVLRQ$
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ$XJXVW
,Q7KH,RZD'LVWULFW&RXUW)RU:DSHOOR&RXQW\
'RXJ3DXOVHWDOHWDO3ODLQWLIIVYV5LFKDUG:DUUHQHWDO'HIHQGDQWV /DZ1R
/$/$'LYLVLRQ$
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ$XJXVW
,Q7KH&LUFXLW&RXUWRI2KLR&RXQW\:HVW9LUJLQLD
5REHUW$QGUHZVHWDOY$QWHURHWDO
&LYLO$FWLRQ1&
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ-XQH
,Q7KH7KLUG-XGLFLDO'LVWULFW&RXQW\RI'RQD$QD1HZ0H[LFR %HWW\*RQ]DOH]HWDO3ODLQWLIIVYV'HO2UR'DLU\'HO2UR5HDO(VWDWH//&-HUU\6HWWOHVDQG'HZDUG 'H5X\WHU'HIHQGDQWV
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ
-XO\
,Q7KH,RZD'LVWULFW&RXUW)RU0XVFDWLQH&RXQW\
/DXULH)UHHPDQHWDO3ODLQWLIIVYV*UDLQ3URFHVVLQJ&RUSRUDWLRQ'HIHQGDQW &DVH1R
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ
0D\
,QWKH&LUFXLW&RXUWRIWKHWK-XGLFLDO&LUFXLWLQDQG)RU%URZDUG&RXQW\)ORULGD :DOWHU+LQWRQHWDO3ODLQWLIIYV&LW\RI)RUW/DXGHUGDOH)ORULGDD0XQLFLSDOLW\'HIHQGDQW &DVH1XPEHU&$&(
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ
'HFHPEHU
,QWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW:HVWHUQ'LVWULFWRI2NODKRPD 7RPP\0F&DUW\HWDO3ODLQWLIIVY2NODKRPD&LW\/DQGILOO//&GED6RXWKHDVW2NODKRPD&LW\ /DQGILOOHWDO'HIHQGDQWV
&DVH1R
FY&
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ
-XO\
3DXO(5RVHQIHOG3K' 3DJH RI -XQH
,QWKH&RXQW\&RXUWRI'DOODV&RXQW\7H[DV
/LVD3DUUHWDOPlaintiffYV$UXEDHWDODefendant. &DVH1XPEHUFF(
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ
0DUFKDQG6HSWHPEHU
5RVHQIHOG7ULDO
$SULO
,QWKH&RXUWRI&RPPRQ3OHDVRI7XVFDUDZDV&RXQW\2KLR -RKQ0LFKDHO$ELFKWHWDOPlaintiffs,YV5HSXEOLF6HUYLFHV,QFHWDODefendants &DVH1XPEHU
&7
&RQVZ
&9
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ
2FWREHU
,QWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUWRI6RXWKHUQ'LVWULFWRI7H[DV*DOYHVWRQ'LYLVLRQ .\OH&DQQRQ(XJHQH'RQRYDQ*HQDUR5DPLUH]&DURO6DVVOHUDQG+DUYH\:DOWRQHDFK,QGLYLGXDOO\DQG RQEHKDOIRIWKRVHVLPLODUO\VLWXDWHGPlaintiffs, YV%33URGXFWV1RUWK$PHULFD,QFDefendant. &DVH
FY
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ
)HEUXDU\
5RVHQIHOG7ULDO
$SULO
,QWKH&LUFXLW&RXUWRI%DOWLPRUH&RXQW\0DU\ODQG
3KLOLS(&YDFK,,HWDOPlaintiffsYV7ZR)DUPV,QFGED5R\DO)DUPV'HIHQGDQWV &DVH1XPEHU
&27
5RVHQIHOG'HSRVLWLRQ
6HSWHPEHU
EXHIBIT C
• Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).
Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:
With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 100 environmental impact reports since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, Valley Fever, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at industrial facilities. • Manager of a project to provide technical assistance to a community adjacent to a former Naval shipyard under a grant from the U.S. EPA.
• Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.
• Expert witness on two cases involving MTBE litigation. • Expert witness and litigation support on the impact of air toxins and hazards at a school. • Expert witness in litigation at a former plywood plant.
With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.
2 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. 3 • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.
Executive Director:
As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.
Hydrogeology:
As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.
At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.
As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
4 • Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.
Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.
EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.
With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐ wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.
Policy:
Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles into the policy‐making process.
• Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents. 5 Geology:
With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.
As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.
Teaching:
From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.
Matt taught physical geology (lecture and lab and introductory geology at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California from 2010 to 2014.
Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.
EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.
Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.
6 Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.
Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.
Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.
7 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.
Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential Water Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.
Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.
Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.
Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.
Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.
Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.
Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐ contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 8 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.
Other Experience:
Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examination, 2009‐ 2011.
9 EXHIBIT D
HOUSING
ELEMENT
C I T Y O F O X N A R D
2021-2029
Amended Housing Element
Adopted October 4, 2022
Resolution No. 15,635
ORANGE COUNTY • BAY AREA • SACRAMENTO • CENTRAL COAST • LOS ANGELES • INLAND EMPIRE www.placeworks.com
CITY OF OXNARD
2021-2029
AMENDED HOUSING ELEMENT
Adopted October 4, 2022
Resolution No. 15,635
for the City of Oxnard
Prepared By: PlaceWorks
P .O. Box 1316
San Luis Obispo, California 93406
CITY OF OXNARD
2021-2029
AMENDED HOUSING ELEMENT
Acknowledgements
Project Team
Kathleen Mallory, Planning and Sustainability Manager, City of Oxnard Heather Davis, Rincon Consultants
Jennifer Gastelum, PlaceWorks
Amy Sinsheimer, PlaceWorks
City Staff
Ashley Golden, Assistant City Manager
Vyto Adomaitis, Community Development Director
Emilio Ramirez, Director, Housing Department
Planning Commission
Daniel Chavez Jr. – Chair
Ronald Arruejo – Vice-Chair
Katherine Connelly – Commissioner
Miguel Lopez –Commissioner
Jeremy Meyer – Commissioner
Steve Nash – Commissioner
Robert Sanchez – Commissioner
City Council
John C. Zaragoza, Mayor
Bryan A. MacDonald, Mayor Pro Tem, District 4
Bert E. Perello, Councilmember, District 1
Gabe Teran, Councilmember, District 2
Oscar Madrigal, Councilmember, District 3
Gabriela Basua, Councilwoman, District 5
Vianey Lopez, Councilmember, District 6
October 2022 Page i
Table of Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Updating the Housing Element .......................................................................................................... 1 Consistency with State Law .............................................................................................................. 1 Format ............................................................................................................................................... 2 2030 General Plan ............................................................................................................................ 3 A Review and Revise Previous Policies and Goals ........................................... A-1 A.1 Progress in Achieving 2013–2021 Housing Element Goals and Policies ............................ A-1 A.2 Progress in Implementing the 2013–2021 Housing Element............................................... A-3 B Existing Housing Needs .................................................................................. B-1 B.1 Data Sources ...................................................................................................................... B-1 B.2 Demographic, Employment, and Housing Characteristics .................................................. B-2 B.3 Overpayment and Overcrowding ...................................................................................... B-11 B.4 Income .............................................................................................................................. B-13 B.5 Extremely Low-Income Households and Housing Problems ............................................. B-16 B.6 Housing Stock Characteristics .......................................................................................... B-17 B.7 Assisted Housing Developments at Risk of Conversion .................................................... B-21 B.8 Fair Housing Assessment ................................................................................................. B-29 B.9 Opportunities for Energy Conservation ............................................................................. B-57 Oxnard Housing Element
Page ii October 2022
C Populations with Special Housing Needs ...................................................... C-1 C.1 Persons with Disabilities ..................................................................................................... C-2 C.2 Elderly ................................................................................................................................. C-7 C.3 Large Families and Single-Parent Families ......................................................................... C-9 C.4 Farmworkers ..................................................................................................................... C-12 C.5 Families and Persons in Need of Emergency Housing ..................................................... C-17 D Projected Housing Needs ................................................................................ D-1 D.1 Regional Housing Needs Allocation .................................................................................... D-1 D.2 Housing Production Progress ............................................................................................. D-2 E Constraints....................................................................................................... E-1 E.1 Land-Use Planning and Development Standards ............................................................... E-1 E.2 2030 General Plan ............................................................................................................ E-20 E.3 Fees and Exactions .......................................................................................................... E-20 E.4 Provisions for a Variety of Housing Types......................................................................... E-23 E.5 Processing and Permit Procedures ................................................................................... E-33 E.6 Building Codes and On-/Off-Site Improvements ............................................................... E-45 E.7 Non-Governmental Constraints ......................................................................................... E-48 E.8 Other Local Regulations .................................................................................................... E-52 F Achieving the RHNA Allocation .................................................................... F-1 F.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................F-1 F.2 Accessory Dwelling Unit Potential ........................................................................................F-2 F.3 Vacant Sites .........................................................................................................................F-3 F.4 Non-Vacant Sites .................................................................................................................F-4 F.5 Market Trends ......................................................................................................................F-5 F.6 Realistic Capacity .............................................................................................................. F-12 F.7 RHNA Capacity Summary .................................................................................................. F-13 F.8 Rio Urbana ......................................................................................................................... F-14 F.9 Teal Club Specific Plan . ..................................................................................................... F-14 F.10 Environmental Constraints and Adequate Infrastructure .................................................... F-15 F.11 Coastal Zone Housing........................................................................................................ F-17 F.12 Public Outreach Program ................................................................................................... F-18 G Goals and Policies .......................................................................................... G-1 G.1 Housing and Neighborhood Conservation .......................................................................... G-1 G.2 Development Opportunities ................................................................................................. G-2 G.3 Housing Assistance and Special Needs .............................................................................. G-4 G.4 Appropriate Governmental Regulations .............................................................................. G-4 G.5 Fair and Equal Housing Opportunity ................................................................................... G-5 G.6 Housing Programs .............................................................................................................. G-6 Supplement 1 – Sites Inventory
Supplement 2 – Qualified Entities
Table of Contents
October 2022 Page iii
Supplement 3 – Meetings Details Including How Comments Were Addressed Full Sites List
List of Tables
Table A-1 Progress Towards 2014-2021 RHNA ..................................................................... A-4 Table A-2 Review of Previous Housing Element Implementation ........................................... A-5
Table B-1 Oxnard Population Growth Trends ......................................................................... B-2 Table B-2 Ventura County Population Growth Trends ............................................................ B-3 Table B-3 California Population Growth Trends ...................................................................... B-3 Table B-4 Population Trends in Neighboring Jurisdictions ...................................................... B-3 Table B-5 Oxnard Population Forecast ................................................................................... B-4 Table B-6 Oxnard Population by Age, 2010 and 2018 ............................................................ B-5 Table B-7 Race and Hispanic Origin Profile for Oxnard and Ventura County, 2010-2019 ...... B-6 Table B-8 Oxnard Employment by Industry, 2009 and 2018 .................................................. B-7 Table B-9 Ventura County Large Employers Located in Oxnard ............................................ B-7 Table B-10 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA, 2020 Mean Annual Earnings by Occupation .............................................................................................................. B-8 Table B-11 Ventura County and Oxnard Employment Projections, 2016 to 2045 .................... B-9 Table B-12 City of Oxnard, Travel time to Work ........................................................................ B-9 Table B-13 City of Oxnard, In-Area Labor Force, 2017/2018 .................................................. B-10 Table B-14 Oxnard Households by Tenure, 2000 to 2018 ...................................................... B-10 Table B-15 Oxnard Household Projections, 2016 to 2045 ...................................................... B-10 Table B-16 Oxnard Households Overpaying by Income, 2016 ............................................... B-12 Table B-17 Oxnard Overcrowded Households, 2018 .............................................................. B-13 Table B-18 Ventura County HCD Income Limits Summary, 2020 .......................................... B-14 Table B-19 Fair Market Rents in Ventura County, 2019–2021 ............................................... B-14 Table B-20 Housing Affordability in Ventura County, 2020 ..................................................... B-15 Table B-21 Household Income by Tenure, 2018 ..................................................................... B-16 Table B-22 Oxnard Housing Problems for All Households CHAS Data Book, 2016 ............... B-17 Table B-23 H ousing Growth Trends, 2010 and 2020 .............................................................. B-17 Table B-24 Oxnard Housing Units by Type, Oxnard, 2010 and 2020 ..................................... B-18 Table B-25 Oxnard Year Housing Structure Built .................................................................... B-18 Table B-26 Vacancy Status in Oxnard and Ventura County, 2010 and 2018 ......................... B-20 Table B-27 Oxnard Survey of Rental Costs, July 2019 ........................................................... B-20 Table B-28 Prices of Homes Sold for Oxnard, November–December 2020 ........................... B-21 Table B-29 Oxnard Inventory of Assisted Housing ................................................................. B-22 Table B-30 Oxnard Assisted Housing at Risk of Conversion to Market Rate ......................... B-27 Table B-31 Potential Rent Subsidies ....................................................................................... B-28 Table B-32 Factors that Contribute to Fair Housing Issues .................................................... B-44
Table C-1 Oxnard Persons with Disability by Employment Status, 2018 ................................ C-3 Table C-2 Breakdown of Disability Type by Age Groups, 2018 .............................................. C-4 Table C-3 Developmentally Disabled Residents by Age: 2019 ............................................... C-5 Table C-4 Developmentally Disabled Residents by Residence Type in Oxnard: 2019 ........... C-5 Table C-5 Agencies Serving Special Needs Populations ........................................................ C-6 Oxnard Housing Element
Page iv October 2022
Table C-6 Oxnard Elderly Households, 2010 to 2018 ............................................................. C-8 Table C-7 Ventura County and Oxnard Household Income for Households Over 65 Years of Age, 2018 ........................................................................................................... C-9 Table C-8 Large Households by Tenure, 2010 to 2018 ........................................................ C-10 Table C-9 Oxnard Family Head of Household Distribution, 2010 and 2018 .......................... C-11 Table C-10 Farmworkers in Ventura County and California: 2017 .......................................... C-13 Table C-11 State-Licensed Farmworker Camps in Ventura County ....................................... C-16 Table C-12 Homeless Count by Jurisdiction, 2020 ................................................................. C-17 Table C-13 Agencies Serving Homeless and Low-Income Persons ....................................... C-19 Table C-14 Oxnard Homeless Shelter Programs ................................................................... C-20
Table D-1 Ventura County 2021–2029 Regional Housing Needs Allocation ......................... D-2 Table D-2 Residential Units Approved, through July 2021 ..................................................... D-3 Table D-3 Remaining RHNA through July 2021 ..................................................................... D-3
Table E-1 Residential Zoning and 2030 General Plan Compatibility ...................................... E-4 Table E-2 Residential Development Standards by Zoning District .......................................... E-6 Table E-3 Allowances for Housing in Oxnard’s Nonresidential Zoning Districts ................... E-13 Table E-4. Residential Off-Street Parking Requirements ....................................................... E-17 Table E-5 Planning and Development Fees, 2020 ................................................................ E-21 Table E-6. Development Costs .............................................................................................. E-23 Table E-7. Housing Types Permitted by Zoning District ......................................................... E-35 Table E-8. Timelines for Permit Procedures .......................................................................... E-44 Table E-9. Typical Processing Timeline by Project Type ....................................................... E-45 Table E-10. Single-Family Detached New Construction Costs, 2020 ...................................... E-49 Table E-11. Multifamily New Construction Costs, 2020 ........................................................... E-50 Table E-12. Conf orming Loan Interest Rates ........................................................................... E-51
Table F-1. Summary of Vacant and Non-Vacant Sites (Including Specific Plans and Pending Annexations ............................................................................................................ F-4 Table F-2. Representative Projects .......................................................................................... F-7 Table F-3. Comparison of Site Capacity to 2021-2029 Regional Housing Needs Assessment .......................................................................................................... F-13 Table F-4 Coastal Zone Affordable Housing Documentation ................................................ F-18
Table G-1. Housing Unit Objectives by Income Category (Quantified Objectives):
2021–2029 .............................................................................................................. G-7 Table G-2. Housing Element Implementation Programs .......................................................... G-8
List of Figures
Figure B-1. Median Home Sales Price for Existing Homes ..................................................... B-21 Figure B-2. TCAC/HCD Opportunity Areas ............................................................................. B-48 Figure B-3. Median Income Distribution .................................................................................. B-49 Figure B-4. Familial Status ...................................................................................................... B-50 Figure B-5. Population with Disability ...................................................................................... B-51 Figure B-6. Diversity Index ...................................................................................................... B-52 Figure B-7. Linguistic Isolation ................................................................................................ B-53 Figure B-8. Hispanic Majority .................................................................................................. B-54 Figure B-9. Access to Schools ................................................................................................ B-55 Table of Contents
October 2022 Page v
Figure B-10. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 ............................................................................................. B-56 Figure B-11. Overpayment ........................................................................................................ B-57 Figure B-12. Racially Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPS) ............................................ B-58 Figure E-1. Location of ML and MLPD Zoned Parcels within the City of Oxnard .................... E-32 Figure E-2. CURB and Coastal Zone Boundaries ................................................................... E-54
Sites Inventory Maps .................................................................................................... Supplement 1 Oxnard Housing Element
Page vi October 2022
Acronyms
AAHOP All-Affordable Housing Opportunity Program
AI Analysis of Impediments
CAR California Association of Realtors
CBD Central Business District
CDBG Community Development Block Grant
CDC Community Development Commission
CEDC Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CHAS Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
CIP Capitol Improvement Plan
CMWD Calleguas Municipal Water District
CSU California State University
CSUCI California State University, Channel Islands
CURB City Urban Restriction Boundaries
DAC Development Advisory Committee
DOE-LIWAP Department of Energy, Low-Income Weatherization Assistance Program DOF Department of Finance
DSD Development Services Department
EIR Environmental Impact Report
FAR Floor Area Ratio
FCGMA Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency
FMR Fair Market Rent
HAPS Housing Assistance Program for Seniors
HCD Housing and Community Development
HERO Historic Enhancement and Revitalization of Oxnard
HMDA Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
HOME Housing Opportunities Made Equal
HRC Housing Rights Center
HUD Housing and Urban Development
INCF Inter Neighborhood Council Forum
LAFCO Local Agency Formation Commission
LIHEAP Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program
MFI Median Family Income
mgd million gallons per day
MND Mitigated Negative Declaration
MCC Mortgage Credit Certificate
MSFES Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker Enumeration Profiles Study MWD Metropolitan Water District
Table of Contents
October 2022 Page vii
NHC National Housing Conference
NODs Notices of Default
NOFAs Notice of Funding Availabilities
OASIS Older Adult Services and Intervention System
OHA Oxnard Housing Authority
OWTP Oxnard Wastewater Treatment Plant
PD Planned Development
PRG Planned Residential Group
RHNA Regional Housing Need Assessment
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SOAR Save Open Space and Agricultural Resources
SUP Special Use Permit
USPS United States Postal Service
UWCD United Water Conservation District
VCOG Ventura Council of Governments
VCTC Ventura County Transportation Comission
VCREA Ventura County Regional Energy Alliance
Oxnard Housing Element
Page viii October 2022
This page intentionally blank
I NTRODUCTION
October 2022 Page 1
Purpose
The 2021–2029 Housing Element identifies and analyzes the current and future housing needs of residents within the City of Oxnard (City) and establishes housing goals, policies, and programs to meet the needs of certain special populations and provide adequate development opportunities for the private and non-profit sectors.
The statutory planning period is October 15, 2021, to October 15, 2029, a period of eight years. The time frame during which housing accomplishments towards the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) can be counted (RHNA cycle) is June 30, 20 21, through October 15 , 20 29. The housing requirements of lower- income households and special needs groups are given particular attention. The City seeks to conserve and rehabilitate existing housing as well as provide opportunities for new development.
Updating the Housing Element
The California State Legislature identified the State’s major housing goal as the attainment of a decent home and suitable living environment for every Californian at all income level s. Due to the critical role that local planning programs play in achieving this goal, California State Legislature requires that all jurisdictions prepare and periodically review and update a Housing Element.
Consistency with State Law
Government Code Section 65583 lists requirements of the Housing Element. Each Housing Element must contain “an identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs and a statement of goals, policies, quantified objectives, Oxnard Housing Element
and scheduled program actions for the preservation, improvement , and development of housing.” By law, the Housing Element must contain:
An assessment of existing and future housing needs and an inventory of resources and constraints relevant to meeting those needs; A statement of the community's goals, quantified objectives, and policies relevant to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing; and
A program that sets forth a schedule of actions that the local government is undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the policies and achieve the goals and objectives of the Housing Element.
The Housing Element must also:
Provide clear policy and direction for making decisions pertaining to zoning, subdivision approval, housing allocations, and capital improvements;
Identify adequate residential sites available for a variety of housing types for all income levels;
Assist in developing adequate housing to meet the needs of extremely low- , very low-, low-, and moderate-income households;
Identify and Address governmental constraints to housing maintenance, improvement, and development;
Conserve and improve the condition of the existing affordable housing stock;
Promote housing opportunities for all persons at all income levels; and Promote the ‘Affirmatively furthering fair housing’ (AFFH) provision of the Fair Housing Act.
The Housing Element requires review and certification by the State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
Format
Including this introduction, the Oxnard 2021–2029 Housing Element is divided into eight chapters and three supplements:
Introduction (this section): Provides an overview of the Housing Element, including its purpose, update process and consistency with State law, format, relationship to the 2030 General Plan, and relevant housing history in Oxnard.
Chapter A: Review and Revise Previous Policies and Goals – An analysis of the effectiveness of the 2013-2021 Mid-Cycle Housing Element; implementation progress; and appropriateness of goals, policies , and programs since adoption of the Mid-Cycle Housing Element in late 2017.
Chapter B: Existing Housing Needs – Demographic and economic profiles and growth projections as well as the current status of housing stock within the city. The needs of low-income residents are given special attention.
Introduction
October 2022 Page 3
Chapter C: Special Housing Needs – E lderly, persons with disabilities (including those with developmental disabilities), large or single-parent families, families or individuals that are in need of emergency housing, permanent or seasonal farmworker housing, and the housing needs of other populations are presented.
Chapter D: Projected Housing Needs –T he Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) for the City, progress towards achieving the need, and the remaining need by income category.
Chapter E: Constraints – Issues that may affect the development of housing, especially for low-income and special-needs households.
Chapter F: Achieving the RHNA – This chapter analyzes the available sites for residential development and describes how the City plans to accommodate the remaining RHNA allocation.
Chapter G: Goals, Policies, and Programs – T he goals, policies, and programs that will guide the City’s efforts in meeting the RHNA allocation and related current and future housing needs.
Supplement 1: Provides detailed information about vacant and underutilized sites identified as suitable for housing development that, if developed and/or entitled by late 2029, would cumulatively meet the RHNA allocation.
Supplement 2: List from state with entities qualified to manage affordable housing projects.
Supplement 3: Excerpts from staff reports from City meetings on the Housing Element Update including details of how some comments were responded to.
2030 General Plan
The Oxnard 2021 –2029 Housing Element, after adoption and HCD certification, becomes Chapter 8 of the Oxnard 2030 General Plan, replacing the current 2013- 2021 Housing Element in its entirety. The City will make edits to the Land Use Element and Land Use map at the same time as updating the Housing Element to address changes needed on sites included in the Housing Element.
State law requires that “the general plan and elements and parts thereof comprise an integrated, internally consistent, and compatible statement of policies.” Internal consistency is required to avoid policy conflict and provide a clear policy guide for the future maintenance, improvement, and development of housing in Oxnard. The City adopted the 2030 General Plan in 2011. This Housing Element update remains consistent with the 2030 General Plan and the City will continue to maintain General Plan consistency as needed throughout the HCD planning period.
The unincorporated community of Nyeland Acres was identified in the City’s Sphere of Influence pursuant to Senate Bill ( SB) 244, the City amended the Land Use element per SB 244 requirements on December 13, 2016. No additional disadvantaged unincorporated communities were identified during the Housing Element update in 2021.
Oxnard Housing Element
Housing Elements were first required by the State of California in 1981 and the 2021-2029 Housing Element is the “sixth cycle.” Each cycle is initiated by state legislation that has progressively added more topics for jurisdictions to include.
Cycles 1 and 2 were short and advisory only. Beginning with Cycle 3, the City initiated programs that remain in effect, as shown below. Increasingly in many jurisdictions, the Housing Element is “driving” a jurisdiction’s General Plan. 1998–2005 [3rd Cycle] The City Initiated the 10 percent inclusionary affordable housing program.
2006–2014 [4th Cycle] Preparation of the Housing Element was delayed to coincide with the 2030 General Plan ; the Housing Element was eventually adopted and certified in 2011. The All-Affordable Housing Opportunity Program (AAHOP) was adopted in 2012. The RHNA allocation was determined by the City’s General Plan with regional oversight by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG).
2013–2021 [5 th Cycle] The RHNA allocation determination was based only on each jurisdictions’ input with n o SCAG oversite. The Housing Element update was completed in 2016. Because the 2013 -2021 Housing Element was adopted after its statutory due date (October 2013), a “Mid-Cycle 2013-2021 Housing Element” required by state law was Adopted in 2017.
2021–2029 [6th Cycle] Major state legislation between 2017 and 2020 and changes in approach to RHNA determination change d context for the 6th Cycle Housing Element:
SCAG developed the RHNA methodology which was then approved by HCD.
State legislation required adding ‘current need’ on top of future need partly to address the lack of housing being built during the Great Recession of 2008 to 2015. S tate law Requires consistency with the 2045 R egional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) that emphasize transit-oriented development (TOD).
2017 legislation created accessory dwelling units as a new type of affordable housing and required streamlining for affordable housing projects, strengthens the No Net Loss and Housing Acco untability Act laws, added funding for local governments to support the acceleration of housing production.
In 2018 through 2020, additional housing legislation was passed creating a state density bonus for housing projects.
The City’s 2021–2029 RHNA allocation is about 16 percent higher than the prior RHNA allocation, but about the same for the very low- and low-income categories. The state has provided more guidance for counting accessory dwelling units towards the RHNA as part of the Housing Element.
A
R EVIEW AND R EVISE P REVIOUS P OLICIES AND G OALS
October 2022 Page A-1
A.1 Progress in Achieving 2013–2021 Housing Element Goals and Policies State law requires all regional councils of government to determine the existing and projected housing need for its region. The City of Oxnard (City) is in the region covered by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). For each Housing Element planning cycle, SCAG is required to determine the share of the regional housing need to be allocated to each city and unincorporated county areas within the SCAG region. This is called the Regional Housing Need Assessment (RHNA) allocation.
To ensure each jurisdiction addresses the housing needs of various income levels, the RHNA number is divided into income groups. To determine the allocation and use of public subsidies, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) created i ncome categories based on the Ventura County Median Household Income (MHI), which is calculated by the U nited States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The RHNA/HUD income categories are defined as:
Extremely low-income households earn a maximum of 30 percent of the Ventura County MHI
Very low-income households earn b etween 31 and 50 percent of the county MHI
Low-income households earn between 51 and 80 percent of the county MHI
Moderate-income households earn between 81 and 120 percent of the county MHI
Oxnard Housing Element
Page A-2 October 2022
Above-moderate/upper-income households earn more than 120 percent of the county MHI
The City worked diligently to address the housing needs of special needs groups during the previous Housing Element planning period. Some of the accomplishments are highlighted below:
All Special Needs Groups: The City continued to provide matching grants for downpayment assistance to lower -income households purchasing single-family units, condominiums, and mobile homes. The City also assisted 15 lower-income (extremely low, very low and low -income combined) families with rehabilitation loans funded with CDBG funds from 2018 to 2020 . In order to increase the number of affordable units developed with in-lieu fees, the City adopted an inc lusionary housing fee in 2020.
Seniors: The City continued to allow reduced parking requirements for senior housing projects.
Large Families/Households: In 2019, the 40-unit Ormond Beach Villas (100-percent affordable) veterans rental development was completed with financial support from the City. One of the units included a three-bedroom unit, intended for a large family. In addition, a 100 -percent affordable farmworker development is proposed and the Las Cortes afford able development is securing funding; both will include three-bedroom units. Military Personnel: The Ormond Beach Villas project was finalized in 2019, with financial support from the City, to target highly vulnerable/low-income veterans in need of affordable housing.
Homeless Persons: The City began using a former National Guard Armory to provide temporary emergency shelter on a 24- hour basis in January 2019. Operation was taken over by Mercy Housing in June 2019, and it will remain open until the City completes development of the new Navigation Center at 241 W. 2
nd Street. The City estimates project completion of the multi-story, mixed-use Navigation Center, permanent supportive housing units, and administrative office space for supportive service providers within two years. The existing shelter space was expanded to a second location at 350 S. K Street to provide safer conditions for homeless people and prevent the spread of COVID-19. During this time, a rapid-rehousing program was also implemented within the Oxnard navigation center. The City also provided the Winter Warming Shelter to people experiencing homelessness and services to the people residing in homeless encampments near Ormond Beach. The City also partnered with the Salvation Army to provide street outreach services and hired a Homeless Services Coordinator in July 2020 . Support and practical services were also initiated at “The One Stop” weekly in Oxnard to provide homeless individuals with hygienic services and connect them with service providers for longer-term housing, job training, and independent living. The City also administered and assisted Gabriel’s House, a shelter for adults with children, and obtained grant funding to remodel the shelter. The City has
A. Review and Revise Previous Policies and Goals
October 2022 Page A-3
also dedicated Measure O funds and State HEAP funding to build a permanent year-round shelter in partnership with the City of Ventur a and the County of Ventura.
Those with Disabilities: The Oxnard Housing Authority partnered with other public agencies to apply for and receive grant funding to support non- elderly persons with disabilities transitioning out of institutional settings and at risk of becoming homeless.
Extremely Low -Income Households: Oxnard has partnered with a developer to build a 109 -unit development that is 100 percent affordable on the Las Cortes site. The City plans to build an additional 64 units on the remaining portion of the Las Cortes site. In addition, the AAHOP Cypress Gardens project, which will house special needs residents who are extremely low income, was approved in 2018. The City is supportive of the Central Terrace Apartments, an 87- unit 100 percent affordable development currently in process of obtaining entitlements. O nce developed, the Central Terrace Apartments will target tenants at 30 , 50, and 60 percent AMI. In addition, new families were admitted to the Section 8 program starting in 2019. The Housing Authority launched the Rethink and Renew effort to improve internal structure and processes of the Section 8 program, with the goal of improving the Housing Authority’s functioning to support the efficiency of its programs, such as landlord and tenant relations and increase the participation rate of property owners in the Section 8 program. The City also provided individual case management and investigation services to Oxnard residents, housing providers, and home seekers through their partnership with the Housing Rights Center. The City also worked with the Oxnard Union High School District and the Rio School District to annex large sites for affordable housing into the City.
Farmworkers: Several farmworker developments have been completed in the City utilizing a variety of local, federal, and state funding sources . In 2019, the Housing Department provided HOME funds for the construction of a 42- unit farmworker housing development, which will include some units that will be reserved for extremely low-income households.
A.2 Progress in Implementing the 2013–2021 Housing Element Table A -1 displays the RHNA allocations for the 2014 through 2021 RHNA projection period and the housing units the City completed, approved, or under construction through the end of 2020. Table A-2 on the following pages presents an analysis of the programs presented in the Oxnard 2013–2021 Housing Element.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page A-4 October 2022
Table A-1 Progress Towards 2014–2021 RHNA
Income Group RHNA
Allocation
Residential Units
Built
2014–2019
Residential Units
Approved or Under
Construction
2014–2020
Remaining RHNA
Very Low Income 1,688 159 47 1,482
Low Income 1,160 527 63 570
Moderate Income 1,351 419 747 185
Above-Moderate Income 3,102 855 2,108 139
Totals 7,301 1,960 2,965 2,376
Sources: SCAG, 2012; City of Oxnard, 2021
Note: The 5th cycle Housing Element RHNA projection period began January 1, 2014 while the planning period began October 15, 2013.
Table A-2 on the following pages lists the 31 programs in the 2013- 2021 Housing Element, the implementation status of each program as of January 2020, and direction to Continue, Amend and Continue, or Delete the program for the 2021- 2029 Housing Element. Of the 31 programs, 15 are recommended to continue (48%), 13 should be amended and continued (42%), and three programs are marked for deletion (10%) (Programs 3, 21, and 26). Two of the deleted programs are related to the All Affordable Housing Opportunity Program (AAHOP) which was the City’s affordable housing overlay program created for the previous two Housing Elements (2006-2014 and 2013-2021). Chapter F presents the City’s strategy to meet the 2021- 2029 RHNA allocation without the need for AAHOP. Additional programs are proposed in Chapter G that respond to recent State legislative requirements or other circumstances that warrant some level of City action. All programs are subject to funding and staff availability.
A. Review and Revise Previous Policies and Goals
October 2022 Page A-5
Table A-2 Review of Previous Housing Element Implementation Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
Program 1: Code Compliance Program
The Code Compliance Division enforces building and property maintenance regulations with a goal of compliance and safety. Code Compliance officers work with neighborhood advisory groups and respond to complaints to identify violations, and then direct owners to appropriate City departments to achieve compliance. The City may have loan and grant programs and works with other agencies to avoid unnecessary displacement. The Housing Department serves as a liaison for Code Compliance in mobile home parks under HCD jurisdiction.
Responsibility: Police Department, with technical support by other departments as needed
Funding: General Fund, CDBG, Measure ‘O’
Time Frame: Ongoing
Objective: Ensure compliance with City codes, with a focus on garage conversions and unpermitted additions.
600 cases per month.
The Code Compliance Division has a staff of eight field officers and one manager who carry an average of 300 cases per month. The types of cases related to residential
properties were, from most to least, as follows: substandard housing, property maintenance, zoning violations, weed
abatement, inoperable vehicles, and encroachments.
Community Development also implemented this program
through the permit review process for additions and/or new development. On every discretionary permit, a standard
condition of approval requires maintenance of property and removal of graffiti within five calendar days.
Code Compliance inspectors meet regularly with Community Development building inspector field staff and the City Attorney’s Office to coordinate and prioritize the Code Compliance workload. The majority of cases referred
involved home improvements completed without permits
(replacement windows, water heaters, etc.) or substandard housing, including conversion of garages or internal
subdivisions to create illegal living quarters that violate Building, Housing, Health and Safety, and Zoning Codes.
The Code Compliance Division posts the Landlord and
Tenant Rights information on the City's website in Spanish and English, and provides contact information for renters to contact Code Compliance for complaints. Code Compliance reacts to complaints within 48 hours. They also react to complaints regarding specific properties from third party agencies such as the Housing Resource Center and the
Ventura County 211 system. For health and safety issues (such as no hot water, dangerous conditions, etc.), the owner is required to pay for relocating the tenant. If the owner does not relocate tenant, the City does have limited access to funds for relocation. The Code Compliance Division also has a program called Safe Homes Safe Families Repeat Offender Program to address issues with repeat offender landlords.
Continue
Oxnard Housing Element
Page A-6 October 2022
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
Program 2: Citywide Homeowner Repair Program
Part A – Loan Component: The Housing Department administers low- interest rehabilitation loans to assist homeowners in repairing plumbing, electrical, roofing, painting, and other systems. The program applies to single-family homes, condominiums, and mobile homes and can be used for room additions. Rehabilitation loans can range up to $75,000 with a 15- year repayment schedule.
Part B – Grant Component: The City of Oxnard offers a matching grant for 50 percent of privately funded exterior work. Grants are typically issued for relatively minor repairs. The City will provide up to $5,000 in grant funding.
Eligibility is limited to qualified low-income households who are homeowners and plan to continue living in their home. If the homebuyer stays in the home for five years, the grant is forgiven; otherwise, the seller must repay the grant with interest to the City.
Funds for this program are less abundant than before the dissolution of the Community Development Commission (CDC), and the City will maintain this program as feasible due to available funding. The City will also explore additional sources of funding such as Cap and Trade and economically disadvantaged set-aside.
Responsibility: Housing Department, Community Development Funding: CDBG, HOME
Time Frame: Seek funding annually
Objective: Provide loans to rehabilitate 25 very low- and 25 low-income homes annually, as funding allows.
During 2020, the Housing Department assisted three lower- income (extremely low, very low and low-income combined) families with rehabilitation loans funded with CDBG funds.
One loan was issued to an extremely low-income household, one to a very low-income household, and one to a low-
income household. The total of the three loans was $72,492.
As funding for affordable housing has diminished, it has been difficult to continue with these programs.
In the coming Housing Element cycle, the City will continue to evaluate the feasibility of the program.
During 2018 and 2019, the Housing Department assisted 12 lower-income families with rehabilitation loans: four loans with low-income households, two loans with a very low-income household, and six loans with extremely low-income
households. The total of the 12 loans was $344,231. Ten of the loans were funded with CDBG funds and two were
funded with HOME funds. While an estimate of 50 annual
home repair loans may have been an appropriate estimate at the time the original goal was set, a more appropriate annual target should be six loans given available resources, the average home repair loan amount, and applications received.
The Housing Department will continue to market the program on their website, through informational flyers, and at
informational community workshops. In 2019, funding for the Residential Rehabilitation program was reduced with
sufficient funding for only six new assisted households, which is the average amount of households assisted in the past two calendar years. However, the Housing Department will
continue to search and apply for new funding opportunities for residential rehabilitation assistance.
Continue
Program 3: All-Affordable Housing Opportunity Program (AAHOP) and “-AH” additive zone designation
The -AH additive zone has an allowable density of 24 to 50 units per acre for all-affordable housing projects (with the exception of Site A-10 with a density of 18 units per acre) or mixed-use projects with all-affordable housing (with the exception of one manager’s unit). The -AH additive zone does not change the underlying General Plan or zone designations for all other uses and development review but acts as an optional use. The City Program 3 is a one-time program that was completed in
2018.
On October 10, 2017, the City adopted its 2013–2021 Mid- Cycle Housing Element (Resolution 15,060), which was
subsequently conditionally certified by HCD on January 11, 2018. The certification was conditioned on “…timely and Delete to replace
with an alternative
program
A. Review and Revise Previous Policies and Goals
October 2022 Page A-7
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
utilizes established underlying development standards and multifamily development standards to ensure quality development with appropriate amenities.
The -AH project applicant is eligible for one development concession such as side yard setback and may also qualify for additional density bonuses, waivers, and/or incentives available consistent with state density bonus law. An -AH additive zone project permits a 100% affordable housing development with a Development Design Review Permit which does not include discretionary review of the residential use. AAHOP sites may be deleted or added as long as capacity remains to meet the remaining RHNA target.
The AAHOP sites added to the AAHOP list in December 2016 will be rezoned during the City’s 2030 General Plan consistency rezoning program initiated in 2017. Additional AAHOP rezonings will occur as part of the comprehensive 2030 General Plan consistency rezoning program to address the need for a minimum of 264 additional higher density units (11 acres) to facilitate the development of housing for lower income households. Additional AAHOP rezoning may also occur as opportunities arise during the remainder of the Housing Element planning period. The consistency rezoning will be completed by 2018.
Responsibility: Development Services
Funding: General Fund
Time Frame: Place -AH additive zone designation on new sites within 180 days of HCD certification of the 2013–2021 Housing Element Objective: Rezone AAHOP sites with the -AH additive zone designation and continue to maintain a running AAHOP inventory that meets or exceeds the remaining RHNA allocation need.
effective implementation of remaining commitments in
Programs 3, 6, 25, 26, and 29.”
Program 3 also noted that the citywide General Plan
Consistency Re-Zoning program could be an opportunity to rezone several AAHOP sites but was not a requirement of Program 3. The consistency rezoning program, which
brought the city zoning districts into compliance with the general plan, was completed in 2019. This helped to remove a significant hurdle to project processing.
The City has evaluated options to address housing needs moving forward, including meeting the 6th Cycle RHNA and the AAHOP program is no longer the best mechanism to
achieve those goals. The AAHOP program will be
discontinued.
Program 4: Urban Village Program
The Urban Village Program (UVP) is part of the 2030 General Plan. The UVP is described in the 2030 General Plan in Goal Cd-7 and Policies CD-
7.1 to CD-7.13. The UVP initially designated seven villages that are envisioned as mixed-use areas designed to encourage persons to live near their place of employment and/or support services and readily accessible to transit. Urban Villages should occur in the designated areas but may be proposed in others as a General Plan Amendment. The integration of land uses is intended to provide and promote a pedestrian orientation to reduce trips and vehicle miles traveled in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Urban Villages are implemented with a specific plan. A minimum of 15 percent of the UVP housing would be affordable. The UVP Since 2017, Planning staff continued to evaluate the Teal Club Specific Plan, the conceptual Northeast Community
Specific Plan Specific Plan amendment (Maulhardt 107
acres), and the Fisherman’s Wharf project to ensure
consistency with General Plan Urban Village policies. The policies are intended to provide and promote a pedestrian orientation to reduce vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled and, therefore, reduce greenhouse gas emissions. No urban village projects were completed since 2017.
Continue
Oxnard Housing Element
Page A-8 October 2022
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
would consider the rezoning and reuse of commercial and industrial land for housing, the consolidation of parcels, and mandating a local preference program for affordable housing. The City will also consider renaming this program “Transit-Oriented Development Neighborhood, District, or Corridor.”
Responsibility: Development Services
Funding: General Fund, SGC AHSC Grant (Cap &Trade) EDC set-aside for highly-qualified census tracts
Time Frame: End of 2021
Objective: Implement the 2030 General Plan Urban Village Program.
Program 5: Parcel Assemblage
In an effort to create additional opportunities for redevelopment and affordable housing and for the AAHOP, the City will help facilitate lot consolidations to combine small residential lots into larger developable lots by meeting with local developers to discuss development opportunities and incentives for lot consolidation to accommodate affordable housing units, as well as consider additional incentives as brought forth by developers.
As developers/owners approach the City interested in lot consolidation for the development of affordable housing, the City will reduce setbacks and/or parking requirements, could defer certain fees, consider waiving lot merger fees for certain small contiguous lots, and concurrent/fast tracking of project application reviews to developers who provide affordable housing.
By 2019 review the effectiveness of this program and revise as appropriate. The City will also pursue grant funding for parcel assemblage land banking when it is available.
Program 5 would also work in tandem with Program 3 to assemble parcels for AAHOP projects.
Responsibility: Economic Development Department
Funding: General Fund
Time Frame: Implement as feasible during planning period if State legislation and/or programs enable a tax-increment or similar program that leads to funding for site assembly.
Objective: Support State legislation that enables site assembly through creation of a tax-increment supported program or district.
Since 2017, no progress in this program was achieved as no state-level program was initiated and there are inadequate City funds to finance a parcel assembly program. Community Development will continue to monitor enabling legislation and seek funding.
The COVID-19 pandemic has required the City to focus
resources on addressing that crisis and has slowed progress towards implementation of this program.
The Housing Department will continue to work with the
Oxnard Successor Agency and private property owners to
purchase various parcels in Downtown Oxnard to assemble the properties necessary to develop affordable housing
projects.
Continue
A. Review and Revise Previous Policies and Goals
October 2022 Page A-9
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
Program 6: Zoning Code Amendments
In order to comply with recently adopted state law and address identified constraints to residential development the City will address the following issues and make needed Zoning Code amendments. Amendments to Chapter 17 (Coastal Zoning) of the code will occur as part of the Local Coastal Plan (LCP) update in progress.
• The City adopted updates to the ADU ordinance in December 2016 to comply with state law and implement this program. Development Services Department staff will meet with local developers and homeowners and review ADU development standards and guidelines and initiate several ‘clean up’ and clarification amendments in 2017.
Beginning in 2018, staff will research and evaluate the feasibility of additional modifications to ADU standards to allow larger ADU’s proportional to the available space on a parcel.
• In 2019, the City anticipates beginning to update the Coastal Zoning Chapter 17 of the Zoning Code to address updates called for in this Housing Element in Programs 9 and 14. (Chapter 17)
• In 2017, amend the Zoning Code to remove the requirement limiting multi-family development to six units per building in the R-2 zoning districts. (Chapters 16)
• In 2017, amend the Zoning Code to decrease the minimum dwelling size for attached dwelling units, with certain findings. (Chapter 16) • In 2017, amend the Zoning Code to reduce the required building separation between attached dwelling units to a distance required for adequate fire safety and privacy as determined by the Oxnard Fire Department and those required to review and evaluate development proposals. (Chapter 16)
• Continue to evaluate Zoning Text Amendments to evaluate potential barriers to zoning regulations which impact the construction of affordable housing
Responsibility: Development Services
Funding: General Fund
Time Frame: 2017 for Chapter 16 amendments; 2018 for Chapter 17 (Coastal Zoning) amendments.
Objective: Revise Zoning Code to comply with recently adopted state law.
The City adopted several zoning ordinance amendments at the time of Housing Element adoption in late 2017 to
implement this program. Those included:
• Amendment to Attached Unit Standards
• Amendment to R-2 to Remove six-unit minimum
standards
• Amendment to ADU ordinance
• Amendment to Reasonable Accommodation Ordinance
and Fee
• Amendment to AAHOP regulations to waive fee for lot
merger
• Amendment to density bonus ordinance
• Amendment to comply with the state Employee Housing
Act regarding farmworker employee housing outside the
Coastal Zone
The City’s focus between 2018 and 2020 was to fully revise the ADU section to comply with 2017 and 2019 State ADU
Legislation and to create a pre-application process consistent with Senate Bill (SB) 330. In 2018, the City prepared a zone text amendment to update ADU regulations to be consistent with 2017 ADU legislation that became effective January 1, 2018. Through 2019, the City successfully used the newly adopted ADU regulations to ministerially process all ADU applications. In July of 2020, the City updated ADU
regulations to be consistent with additional state ADU
legislation that was adopted in 2019 and became effective January 1, 2020.
During the 2018 to 2020 period, the City was also updating its short-term rental ordinance, adopting the Downtown Code, and creating and updating cannabis-related regulations.
Amend to remove
completed items
and add new
zoning work
needed to comply
with state law and
continue
Oxnard Housing Element
Page A-10 October 2022
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
Program 7: Housing Permitting Process Review
The Development Services, Public Works, Housing, and Economic Development departments will continue to jointly review their development review and entitlement processes with the goal of identifying incentives, unnecessary and/or duplicative regulations and/or procedures related to development of housing with an emphasis on AAHOP housing projects (i.e., sites listed in the Housing Element Supplement, Supplement 2), Accessory Dwelling Units, lot merger fee waiver for AAHOP projects, and manufactured housing. As the City budget and staffing allows, and by City Council direction, Development Services is managing permit reviews to implement State Building Codes as efficiently and accurately as possible to ensure public and property safety. The City has established a “one-stop” or “concierge” program to assist applicants with the entitlement process.
Responsibility: Development Services
Funding: General Fund, other funding opportunities related to SB 375 and/or affordable housing
Time Frame: Annually and as project applications are submitted.
Objective: Review and streamline permitting process, especially for AAHOP projects, second units, and manufactured housing.
In October 2017, the City updated the state density bonus and AAHOP portions of the Zoning Code. AAHOP projects
require non-discretionary review by the Development
Services Director, and the Planning Commission has a
nondiscretionary review of a project with a density bonus permit instead of the City Council. The Gateway Station AAHOP project with 240 affordable units was administratively approved in 2016 and constructed in 2017 under a fast-track approval program.
During 2018, Community Development filled a newly created position, Permit Coordinator, to assist in the building permit process, and the Planning Division filled two vacant positions and was fully staffed by the end of 2018. During 2018, three AAHOP projects were entitled for a total of 91 lower-income units (Cypress Gardens Special Needs [30 units], 2161 Etting Road Cabrillo Farmworker Housing [42 units], and 234
Johnson Road [19 units]).
In 2019, the City implemented recommendations to address barriers to development and permits. A range of
improvements were implemented including expeditious
procedures and resource recommendations. Examples of the types of improvements made include:
• Enhanced customer interface
• D etailed road maps to explain the process and next
steps
• Specific timelines and a commitment to meet those
timelines
• Staff training to ensure staff are facilitators not just regulators
• allow more authority for inspectors to make consistent decisions in the field
• Provid ing more staff time to help applicants obtain
approvals and permits
• An expedited processing fee for service
• Shifted decision-making authority to the lowest level possible: Planning Commission and the Community
Development Director
In 2019, one additional AAHOP project was entitled for a total of 20 units (4 lower income). ADUs have continued to be Continue
A. Review and Revise Previous Policies and Goals
October 2022 Page A-11
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
processed ministerially. There were no projects involving manufactured housing in 2018 or 2019 and no changes are anticipated to City permitting regulations or procedures involving manufactured housing.
Program 8: SOAR Affordable Housing Exemption Study
The Oxnard Save Open Space and Agriculture Resources (SOAR) Ordinance was adopted in 1998 and extended in 2016 and established a City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB) line beyond which urban development is subject to a majority approval of Oxnard voters until December 31, 2050. SOAR provides for a CURB line amendment exemption for all-affordable residential projects consistent with the current Oxnard Housing Element, provided a series of findings are made and that no more than 20 acres of land are brought within the CURB for this purpose in any calendar year. This CURB amendment provision is generally known as the SOAR 20-Acre Exemption. This program would have the City develop guidelines for the possible use of the SOAR 20-Acre Exemption including, but not limited to, possible sites, provision of infrastructure and services, and conceptual site plans. Because this program has not been adopted and will require additional development, no affordable units are anticipated by the end of the RHNA planning period.
This program may not be needed during this RHNA planning period as long as opportunity for affordable housing exceeds RHNA allocations.
Responsibility: Development Services, Public Works, Housing Department
Funding: General Fund
Time Frame: During the planning period, if needed
Objective: Develop guidelines for the possible use of the affordable housing exemption in the SOAR ordinance.
SOAR has not been an impediment to development of
affordable housing. Affordable housing is being developed and sites are available without needing to use the 20-acre per year Oxnard SOAR affordable housing exemption. This
program has not been needed during this planning period.
Continue
Program 9: Farmworker Housing Program
Agricultural activities in the Oxnard area are in year-round production. Most of the farmworker labor force is permanent and lives in traditional housing units or mobile homes, although many of these units are overcrowded and/or have converted garages to additional rooms. The Housing Department will continue to seek development partners and funding that focus on affordable farmworker housing development. In addition, the City will provide assistance to the farming community and housing developers in obtaining loans and grants and processing applications for the rehabilitation and/or establishment of new farm labor housing under USDA In October 2017 to further comply with the state Employee Housing Act (Health and Safety Code Sections 17021.5 and 17021.6), the City approved a zoning text amendment to City Code Section 16-10 Definitions to remove and replace the definition for "Farmworker Housing" with "Farmworker
Employee Housing," amend Sections 16-188(B) and 16-256
to allow Farmworker Employee Housing in zones that allow agriculture, and amend Section 16-622(F) to establish
parking requirements for farmworker employee housing.
Amend to fully
comply with the
state Employee
Housing Act and
continue
Oxnard Housing Element
Page A-12 October 2022
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
Rural Development and California Department of Housing and Community Development programs and the new SGC AHSC Grant (Cap &Trade) EDC set-aside for five highly-qualified Oxnard census tracts. The five highly qualified tracts are 6111004902, 6111009100, 6111004715, 6111004704, and 6111003900.
The City will develop by 2018 an informational brochure explaining options, the permitting process, and possible funding sources for the development of a range of farmworker housing uses. The City will continue to work with farmworker stakeholders and the nonprofit community to discuss possible options for locating suitable and available sites for farmworker housing.
The City’s zoning, development standards, and processing requirements encourage and facilitate all types of housing for farmworkers (i.e., multifamily, single-room occupancy, second units, manufactured homes, migrant centers, etc.). In order to fully comply with the state Employee Housing Act (Health and Safety Code Sections 17021.5 and 17021.6) the City will amend its Zoning Code to allow farmworker employee housing in the C-R, M-L, M-1 and M-2 zones because those zones allow agriculture in that manner. The zone text amendment will also document that farmworkers may live together as a household in all zoning districts where single-family is allowed in the same way single-family housing is allowed.
The City will work with farmworker housing proponents to develop housing and permit processes that meet the requirements of H2A Guest Farmworker program. The City will also conduct a historic evaluation of the Camp Vanessa “Bracero” farm labor facility and investigate the merits and environmental issues related to changing its land use designation in order for the camp to become a legal use and thus eligible for rehabilitation and continue use.
Responsibility: Development Services, Economic Development, Housing Department
Funding: General Fund, SGC AHSC Grant (Cap &Trade) EDC set-aside for highly-qualified census tracts
Time Frame: Initiate historic evaluation of the Camp Vanessa camp and prepare brochure by 2016; Amend Zoning Code to comply with Employee Housing Act by 2018; continue to participate with House Farmworkers stakeholders and their projects and meet with the group at least twice per year
Objective: Review and pursue farmworker housing opportunities. Amend the Zoning Code to comply with state law regarding Employee Several farmworker developments have been completed in
the City utilizing a variety of local, federal, and state funding sources. The zone text amendments adopted in tandem with the 2013-2021 Mid-Cycle Housing Element brought the code into compliance with the State Employee Housing Act outside the Coastal Zone. Amendments are still needed in some of the Coastal sub-zones and in the newly adopted DT-E zone to allow farmworker employee housing in the same way that single-family housing is allowed in those zones.
The 42-unit Etting Road farmworker housing project received entitlement approval in 2018. The Housing Department
issued a conditional letter of HOME program funding for the development of the project contingent on the developer
securing all other funding required to construct the project.
The remodel building permits for the Garden City Labor
Camp were issued in 2019 and construction has started. The City did not conduct a historic evaluation of the Camp
Vanessa “Bracero” farm labor facility because it was not determined to be necessary during project development but did work closely with its new owners to approve the
ministerial building permits that extends the life of the facility with a capacity of up to 500 H2A visa workers. The City did not develop an informational brochure. The Planning & Sustainability Manager and periodically the City of Oxnard Housing Director, have participated in the monthly meetings of the House Farmworker group to provide information on housing programs, policies, and options. Additionally, presentations have been provided to continue soliciting input and suggestions on ways to improve farmworker housing.
Planning Division staff continue to work with groups such as House Farmworkers, other farmworker stakeholders, and the nonprofit community to discuss possible options to secure and enhance farmworker housing. The Housing Department will continue to seek development partners and funding that can be used to develop affordable farmworker housing.
A. Review and Revise Previous Policies and Goals
October 2022 Page A-13
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
(farmworker) Housing. At least three projects to be at least in pre- development planning with a qualified nonprofit developer.
Program 10: Inclusionary Housing Program
In 1999, the Inclusionary Housing Program was established to generate affordable housing in proportion with the overall increase in market-rate residential units. City Council Ordinances 2721 and 2615 require developers with 10 or more units to provide 10 percent affordable units.
Developers of rental projects with 10 or more units are required to provide 5 percent for very low-income households and 5 percent for low-income households. Developers may request City Council approval in advance for payment of in-lieu fees, which are periodically adjusted.
The 2013 Latinos Unidos v. Napa County First Appellate District ruling and subsequent HCD opinion letter that requires counting of affordable units under a local inclusionary ordinance to also count toward qualifying for the state density bonus (SB 1818) supersedes City parking requirements, as any project over 10 units automatically earns a 20 percent density bonus, reduced SB 1818 parking requirements, and is entitled to one or more development standard concessions. To date, housing projects continue to provide satisfactory parking. Staff will monitor the inclusionary program to see if projects are being underparked and creating quality of life issues in neighborhoods.
In addition, to ensure the Inclusionary Housing Program does not pose a constraint to the development of all housing affordability levels, the City will annually monitor the implementation of this program, evaluate the impacts on the costs and supply of housing, and make necessary revisions to the program. If revisions are made to the Inclusionary Housing Program, they will be codified as an ordinance in the City’s Zoning Code. Prior to any revisions to the Inclusionary Housing Program, the City will also conduct an analysis of the in-lieu fee and whether it is sufficient.
Responsibility: Housing Department, Development Services Funding: Developer funded by either providing on-site units or in-lieu fees Time Frame: Monitor annually and ongoing
Objective: Produce 50 units per year on average on-site, in-lieu fees lead to average of 30 units per year. No units are counted toward RHNA, as they are not considered certain by HCD.
The City’s Inclusionary Housing Program allows an applicant to choose between in-lieu fee payments and/or land
dedication. It is described further in Chapter E of this element. During 2018, the development of five affordable units were funded with funds collected from inclusionary housing in-lieu fees. Two units were rental units in a 40-unit 100-percent affordable rental development to house
veterans. Three of the units were single-family homes in a 100-percent affordable homeownership development that
included a total of 6 single-family homes that were completed and sold to income-qualified families in 2018. In 2018, 5 on- site inclusionary affordable units were provided in 2
development projects. These units are being counted towards the City’s RHNA target.
In 2019, 40-unit, 100-percent affordable veterans rental development, was completed (Ormond Beach Villas - 5547 S.
Saviers Road), the Housing Department provided gap-
financing with the use of Affordable Housing In-Lieu fees to pay for the development of two of the 40 units that were developed.
In an effort to increase the number of affordable units developed with in-lieu fees, in May 2020 the City adopted an updated inclusionary housing fee (Resolution No. 2980).
This updated fee followed a lengthy fee study process and evaluation of fee sufficiency. The City is in the process of updating the inclusionary housing requirements to be codified in Chapter 16 of the municipal code.
Amend to reflect
updates made to
the City’s
Inclusionary
Housing Program
and fees and
continue
Oxnard Housing Element
Page A-14 October 2022
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
Program 11: Homeownership Assistance Citywide
Continued assistance is provided for lower-income households to buy single-family units, condominiums, and mobile homes. Under this program, a matching grant of $5,000 is provided for down payment assistance and closing costs. Grants are allocated as follows: (1) residents of Oxnard; (2) persons employed in Oxnard; and (3) all others. If the homebuyer remains in the home for five years, the grant is forgiven. The City extends this program for households purchasing in a designated historic neighborhood.
Responsibility: Housing Department
Funding: HOME CalHOME, BEGIN, Inclusionary in-lieu fees Time Frame: Ongoing
Objective: Assist a total of 40 households annually.
During 2018 and 2019, Oxnard provided homeownership
assistance funded by HOME, CalHOME, BEGIN, in-lieu fees, and CDBG. A total of 30 households were assisted with a total of $1.3 million in funding. In addition, the Housing Authority conducts a Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) program to help families save money for a home or other special needs. In 2018 and 2019, one public housing FSS family
transitioned to homeownership and the program assisted
participants in earning funds in an escrow account that may be used towards the purchase of a home.
During 2020, the Housing Department provided
homeownership assistance funded by HOME and BEGIN. A
total of five households were assisted with $193,944. One loan was provided to a very low-income household, three to low-income households, and one to a moderate-income
household.
In 2020, one public housing FSS family transitioned to
homeownership. The program assisted the family by
facilitating provision of resources and first-time homebuyer education.
While homeownership assistance averaged at least 40
households a year between 2014 and 2016, the elimination of HERO homeownership assistance funding and a lack of
affordable inventory, HOME funding for the homebuyer
assistance program was reduced and used to develop new
affordable housing opportunities in the City. Given current and available resources, a more realistic target may be 10 to 16 households assisted annually.
Continue
Program 12: Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC)
Oxnard participates with a consortium of cities in the Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) program administered by Ventura County. MCCs are available for income-qualified, first-time homebuyers and provide a federal income tax credit up to 20 percent of the annual mortgage interest paid.
Since the mortgage payments repay the bonds, no City guarantee is required. MCCs can be used with City homebuyer programs to assist persons to qualify for private mortgage financing.
Responsibility: Housing Department
Program 12 is an ongoing program with an annual objective of assisting six households to purchase their housing.
The City continued to work with the Ventura County
Consortium. During 2018, 15 Oxnard residents received MCC assistance, as reported by the Ventura County Consortium, exceeding the City's goal of six MCCs issued to Oxnard
residents. During 2019, 20 Oxnard residents received MCCs.
In 2020, Oxnard residents to received MCC credits.
Continue
A. Review and Revise Previous Policies and Goals
October 2022 Page A-15
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
Funding: Mortgage credit certificates (6 per year)
Time Frame: Ongoing and as first-time homebuyers’ applications are pursued
Objective: Continue working with the Ventura County Consortium to distribute funding and work toward Oxnard residents using at least 6 Mortgage Credit Certificates per year.
Program 13: Financial and Regulatory Assistance
The City of Oxnard has a strong record of providing financial and/or regulatory incentives to facilitate the development of affordable housing.
Through direct City assistance, over 100 units have been assisted in the previous two years through financial assistance or relief from regulations in return for deed restrictions requiring the units to remain affordable to low- and very low-income households. CDC is no longer a funding source due to the dissolution of redevelopment agencies in California. The City will target other funding sources for this program, in particular the Strategic Growth Council’s Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities program.
Responsibility: Housing Department, Development Services Funding: HOME, CDBG, SGC AHSC Grant (Cap &Trade) EDC set-aside for highly-qualified census tracts
Time Frame: Pursue AHSC funding annually beginning in 2015 Objective: Continue providing financial and regulatory assistance.
During 2018 and 2019, no applications were filed for AHSC funding. Community Development continued to evaluate
projects for AHSC applications. The challenge was showing significant GHG reductions to score well against other AHSC applications and the costs of preparing the applications. In 2020, the City will consider partnering with an affordable Housing Developer to apply for the next AHSC award. In July 2020, the City did apply for the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) formula grant, issued by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD)
and expects to receive an award amount of up to $6,950,574 over the next five years beginning in 2021.
Continue
Program 14: Shelter Development Program
The City identifies developing a plan to address homelessness as Objective 4 of Goal 1, of Strategic Priority Area C, “Quality of Life.” Departmental priorities by funding year will continue to address this need.
Consistent with SB 2, the City amended its Zoning Code (see Zoning Code Section 16-504) to define and permit supportive and transitional housing as residential uses and to allow emergency shelters with a Special Use Permit in the R-2, R-3, R-4, and C-2 zoning districts. Emergency shelters are allowed without discretionary review in the M-L and M-L-PD zoning districts. Properties with these zoning designations are generally located near the city center, allow for these structures with minimal setbacks, consist of vacant lots and buildings with adequate space for emergency shelter operations, and are accessible to public transportation and medical and commercial services as appropriate for permanent emergency shelters to be allowed by right. Currently, there are a total of 32.49 acres in the M-L The City continues to allow and maintain zoning capacity for emergency shelters as described in the program. The City identified a potential shelter site in 2019, located at 1258 Saviers Road. However, that location was abandoned due to compatibility issues and a desire to allow for a more
comprehensive set of solutions on site. During 2019, the Commission on Homelessness was kept abreast of
developments towards meeting this objective at their monthly meetings. The City began using a former National Guard
Armory located at 351 S. K Street in Oxnard as a temporary emergency shelter on a 24-hour basis in January 2019, with financial assistance from the City and County of Ventura, before operation and management of the shelter was taken over by Mercy House, a non-profit homeless service provider, in June 2019. The K Street Shelter will remain open and continue operating as a 24-hour low-barrier shelter, operated Amend to address
accomplishments
and continue
Oxnard Housing Element
Page A-16 October 2022
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
and M-L-PD zoning districts made up of 16 vacant parcels. The City has set in place development and operational standards consistent with SB 2 (see Zoning Code Section 16-504).
Further amendments to the Zoning Code will be made to allow transitional and supportive housing in all zoning districts that allow residential uses in the same way other residential uses are allowed in those zoning districts.
The City will continue to work with homeless services stakeholders toward developing a year-round emergency shelter in Oxnard.
Responsibility: Housing, Development Services
Funding: General Fund, HUD and other grants as available Time Frame: Amend Zoning Code to fully address SB 2 requirements for transitional and supportive housing by 2019
Objective: Continue to work toward development of a year-round emergency shelter.
by Mercy House, until the City completes the development of its proposed new Navigation Center (241 W. 2nd Street) on a City-owned property. The City is proposing to build a multi- story mixed-use building on the City-owned property that will include a new Navigation Center, administrative office space for supportive service providers, and permanent supportive housing units. The City estimates that project completion will occur within the next two years and is currently in the design phase. In 2020, the Housing Department entered into an
Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with a developer and has begun negotiations to enter into a Disposition and
Development Agreement (DDA) with the developer on the
future navigation center. A land use application for the mixed-use multi-story building was submitted to the City’s Community Development Department. As of December 2020,
the project received all necessary entitlements. The City anticipates executing the DDA with the developer, pending City Council approval of the DDA by March 2021.
Program 15: Homeless Assistance
The City’s Homeless Assistance Program is modeled after the federal government’s continuum of care program. The Homeless Assistance Program contains the following phases: (1) intake and assessment; (2) provision of emergency shelter at year-round and winter shelters to provide temporary housing; (3) provision of transitional facilities and supportive services to help the homeless gain skills for independent living; and (4) permanent supportive housing. Local, state, federal, and private donations provide funding.
Responsibility: Housing, Development Services
Funding: CDBG, General Fund, HUD
Time Frame: Ongoing through planning period
Objective: Continue to implement program with shelter for women with children and winter warming service that averages 700 person-nights.
In January 2018, a large homeless encampment was cleared by a site near Ormond Beach. Inhabitants left the site
voluntarily and it was estimated that approximately 120 people were residing at this site. Of those 120, 12 people visited the Winter Warming Shelter, and 8 people requested assistance from social services. In 2020, another large homeless encampment developed near Ormond Beach. The
City has begun efforts to engage with the population currently residing there. In August 2020, the City teamed up with Ventura County to regularly provide services and engage as many people as possible into shelter and housing. Ventura County provides healthcare services through their Backpack Medicine project. Other services at the encampment site include hygiene services and connection to outreach case workers. The City is currently developing a longer-term engagement plan to determine service needs of the people living in the encampment, then connecting them to services and housing and eventually cleaning the site of debris.
In order to engage with people experiencing homelessness and provide practical assistance, including housing
navigation, employment assistance, health navigation and crisis intervention, in May 2020, the City began working with Amend to address
accomplishments
and continue
A. Review and Revise Previous Policies and Goals
October 2022 Page A-17
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
the Salvation Army to provide street outreach services. In fall of 2020, the scope of services from Salvation Army expanded to provide additional street outreach services in the
downtown area of Oxnard. Salvation Army is currently
recruiting additional staff for these positions.
In 2020, shelter space was expanded to a second location at 350 S K Street, the Police Activities League (PAL) building, to provide safer conditions for preventing the spread of COVID-
19. The total number of beds remained at 110, but now with 42 beds located at the former Armory location on K Street, and 68 beds across the street at the PAL building. This expansion allows for shelter guests to more easily practice social distancing and increases space between the beds.
During this time, a rapid-rehousing program was
implemented within the Oxnard navigation center. This
program provides housing navigation, relocation and
stabilization services to support homeless residents and shelter guests find and maintain permanent housing. The rapid re-housing program also provides financial assistance to help with moving costs, security deposits, utility deposits and short term rental assistance.
The City hired a Homeless Services Coordinator in July 2020.
In 2020, Homeless Services also began providing support and practical services once a week at “The One Stop” outside of the Rescue Mission. At this service location, homeless individuals are able to access hygiene services, including a shower, and connect with service providers, including
Salvation Army outreach services. This program is done in partnership with Ventura County who provides health care and other services. In order to support homeless individuals and gain skills for independent living, homeless services is planning a vocational training pilot program to train and hire people who had experienced homelessness with the goal of eventually securing longer-term/permanent work.
Since 2017, Homeless Services administered and assisted the shelter for adults with children at Gabriel’s House that houses 45 persons a night. Homeless Services continues to assist Grants Management and the Oxnard Housing Authority with CDBG, ESG, and HUD-VASH. Currently, staff is
facilitating $249,000 in CDBG funds for design and
Oxnard Housing Element
Page A-18 October 2022
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
remodeling at Gabriel’s House, utilizing $30,000 for
emergency shelter assistance, providing ESG sub-recipients with monitoring and technical assistance and awaits the placement of HUD-VASH recipients for the Ormond Beach
Project. Homeless Services has also dedicated $1.5 million dollars in Measure O funds and $1.5 million in State HEAP funding to build and operate the permanent year-round
shelter through a tri-party agreement with the City of Ventura and County of Ventura to assist homeless and at-risk
individuals and families.
Program 16: At-Risk Household Assistance
The City currently contains no deed-restricted units and therefore there are no “at-risk” units at this time. Should the City have any at-risk affordable units in the future, the City will contact all state and federal agencies that might provide affordable housing funds to determine whether any funding is available for future preservation of assisted housing developments. The City will work with not-for-profit housing providers to apply for affordable housing subsidies that may be available for this use, if necessary in the future.
Responsibility: Housing, Development Services
Funding: General Fund
Time Frame: As needed through 2023
Objective: Continue to monitor assisted units, and if any become at risk, work with property owners to develop a strategy to maintain any at-risk through 2023.
In 2020, HUD endorsed accelerating the demolition of all remaining 144 public housing units in Colonia Village (located on the corner of First Street and Rose Avenue, which
represents Phases 2 and 3 of the Las Cortes development) outside of the planned progression of the project to mitigate potential safety problems. The process of relocation and demolition and replacement began in 2018 for this project. In 2018, all public housing tenants were permanently relocated, primarily into the newly developed Las Cortes affordable housing development. All 144 units have been removed from the Oxnard Housing Authority’s (OHA) public housing
inventory, the OHA demolished these units, with HUD
approval, since their useful life has expired.
The OHA has partnered with a developer to build a 129-unit development that will be 100 percent affordable on a portion of the former Colonia Village site. The developer contracted to build the second phase reduced the number of units to be developed under this phase from 129 units with 109 units to ensure the final viability of the project for development. The OHA plans to build an additional 64 affordable units in the future on the remaining portion of the former Colonia Village site. This includes 20 units that were previously planned for development under Phase 2.
In 2019, affordability covenants expired on Tierra Vista Apartments (1750 Mountevina Circle, Oxnard, CA 93030),
which included 40 non-elderly units.
Eight out of 20 units were removed from OHA's public
housing inventory at the Althea Court (1361, 1363, 1365, 1367, 1369, 1371, 1373, and 1375 Althea Court, Oxnard, CA Amend to address
accomplishments
and continue
A. Review and Revise Previous Policies and Goals
October 2022 Page A-19
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
93036 ) Public Housing Site in 2019 due to a fire that
destroyed them. OHA intends to replace these units but a date for replacement has not been determined at this time.
Program 17: Fostering Self-Sufficiency
The City will continue to aid private nonprofit entities to develop programs that move individuals or households from homelessness to permanent housing including job assistance. The programs should assist extremely low- to low-income persons or households to achieve economic independence from governmental assistance through a network of human services, including job training and placement, education scholarships, childcare scholarships, rental assistance, transportation, and emergency services. The program may be a public/private partnership. Participants may be required to attend school or occupational skills training, maintain employment, and work to achieve a career that will support their family.
Participants may also work to define their goals and develop strategies through education and skills training to achieve them. The City will meet at least once annually with nonprofits.
Responsibility: Housing Development
Funding: General Fund, CDBG
Time Frame: Annually and ongoing Objective: Support community-based organizations to assist a minimum of 90 households annually, with Oxnard residents comprising a minimum of 80 percent of those assisted, with a program goal of 100 percent.
During 2018 and 2019, the goal of assisting a minimum of 90 families was met. Twenty-nine Public Housing and 69 Section 8 low-income families participated in the Family Self-
Sufficiency program. An additional 31 Public Housing and 37 Section 8 low-income families participated in the Family Self- Sufficiency program in 2020.
At least 700 individuals were provided supportive services facilitated by the ROSS Services Coordinator. ROSS
programs include employment training/mentoring programs, tutoring programs, GED attainment programs, job retention activities, parenting skills, music classes, art workshops, free tax preparation, free access to computer labs, and office assistant workshops. All these programs complement a
family's goal of increasing self-sufficiency and overall quality of life.
In 2020, ROSS services have been expanded to assist with unemployment filings, rental assistance, food share, and health and safety education.
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, in 2020, over 2,500 individuals were provided emergency supportive services facilitated by the ROSS Services Coordinator.
Continue
Program 18: Section 8 Assistance Program
The Section 8 program subsidizes very low-income households who expend over half their income on rent. Prospective renters secure housing from HUD-registered apartments, and HUD pays the difference between what the tenant can afford and the negotiated payment standard. HUD regulations require that 75 percent of new leases be made to households earning below 35 percent of median family income, provided less than 40 percent of their income is spent on housing. In an inflating rental market, this standard is often exceeded, resulting in denial of a certificate. To protect housing opportunities for very low-income households, the rental payment standard must keep pace with the market. The City regularly seeks to increase Section 8 vouchers from HUD.
Services offered to Section 8 landlords included the recently activated landlord online web-portal, which offers the
convenience of access to the ledgers and inspections for units that are currently rented to Section 8 program
participants. The payment standard was increased when the Fair Market Rents were revised/published by HUD. In
addition, the Housing Authority is working in partnership with United Way of Ventura County to pilot an incentivized
landlord program. Internally, we have allocated a full-time staff member to provide intensive housing search assistance to program participants and to reach out to individual
landlords to facilitate the onboarding process.
During 2019, Housing Authority staff continued to encourage landlords to register their available units/properties on the Amend to address
changes in City
programming and
continue
Oxnard Housing Element
Page A-20 October 2022
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
Responsibility: Housing Authority
Funding: HUD
Time Frame: Seek new vouchers and/or to raise the payment standard as needed annually
Objective: Continue to participate, encourage property owners to register units, and seek to raise the payment standard as needed. “Go Section 8” website/portal, which can help landlords to market their units at no cost. In addition, Section 8 staff educated potential landlords on the benefits of accepting the Section 8 program. For the first time in over 2 years, new families were admitted to the Section 8 program.
In 2020, the Housing Authority launched an effort known as “Rethink and Renew” to restructure operations. The goal is to improve landlord and tenant relations and customer service, which in turn will impact the participation rate of property owners in the Section 8 program. An average of 1,679
vouchers were in use in 2020. The total number of Housing Choice Vouchers that were available in 2019 was 1,825.
More than 4,000 people were on the waitlist which is currently closed. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, all efforts had to be postponed until the City of Oxnard authorizes for the department to proceed with community outreach events. In November of 2020, the Housing Authority submitted a grant request to HUD for technical assistance pertaining to the Rethink and Renew efforts. The application revolves around assistance with asset portfolio repositioning, organizational and staff assessment, and analysis of workforce productivity.
All of these tasks are aligned with the goals and objectives of the Rethink and Renew effort.
Program 19: Fair Housing Services
The City of Oxnard provides services to ensure fair and equal housing opportunity. To implement these policies, the City periodically prepares a Fair Housing Assessment, provides fair housing services free of charge to home seekers as well as fair housing training, and coordinates processing and resolution of complaints with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing, when deemed necessary. The City will also make brochures and other fair housing information available in English and Spanish at the Development Services Department, on the City’s website, and at public libraries. In recognition of the need for continued service provision, the City will continue to provide fair housing services.
Responsibility: Housing Department
Funding: CDBG
Time Frame: Ongoing
Objective: Continue to implement and advertise the program in The City continued contracting with the Housing Rights
Center to provide individual case management and
investigation services to Oxnard Residents, housing
providers, and home seekers. This contract is entirely funded with CDBG funds. In 2019 and 2020, the goal of 320 client contacts was met. There were over 350 contacts (133 client households, about 200 paper distributions, 20 attendees at training sessions, and an unknown number of website
contacts for Oxnard residents). Fair housing information was also disseminated through various social media platforms, as well as through distribution of flyers and leaflets. In addition, the City’s Fair Housing Officer, based in the Housing
Department, provided services related to reasonable
accommodation requests for public housing assistance
recipients. An updated regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing was prepared and adopted by City Council in May of 2020.
Amend to address
requirements of AB
686 and continue
A. Review and Revise Previous Policies and Goals
October 2022 Page A-21
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
cooperation with the Housing Rights Center. Average 320 contacts per year.
Program 20: Energy Conservation
The City will continue to post and distribute information on currently available weatherization and energy conservation programs to residents and property owners through annual mailings in City utility billings, distribution of program information to community organizations and at municipal offices, and the City’s website. The City will continue to enforce state requirements, including Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, for energy conservation in new residential projects and will encourage residential developers to employ additional energy conservation measures for the siting of buildings, landscaping, and solar access through programs in the Energy Action Plan. The City will encourage development of affordable housing units that utilize passive or active energy saving features (e.g. solar panels, efficient appliances, efficient building materials) and will assist developers in pursuing funding for these types of developments.
Responsibility: Development Services
Funding: General Fund, SGC AHSC Grant (Cap &Trade)
Time Frame: Advertise programs and implement project-related standards as feasible when development applications are received.
Objective: Increase public awareness and information on energy conservation opportunities and assistance programs for new and existing residential units, and comply with state energy conservation requirements.
The City continued to post and distribute information on currently available weatherization and energy conservation programs to residents and property owners through annual mailings in City utility billings and distributed program information to community organizations and at municipal offices; Community Development continued to enforce state requirements, including Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, for energy conservation in new residential projects and encouraged residential developers to employ additional energy conservation measures for the siting of buildings, landscaping, and solar access; and Community Development continued to encourage development of
affordable housing units that utilize passive or active energy- saving features (e.g., solar panels, tankless water heaters, efficient appliances, and efficient building materials).
Continue
Program 21: Report Housing Element Implementation
The City will prepare an annual report to the City Council (as required by Government Code Section 65400) on achievements in implementing housing programs and meeting the objectives of the City’s Housing Element. The report will include the activities of all City departments responsible for implementing programs contained in the Housing Element.
Responsibility: Development Services, Housing Department Funding: General Fund
Time Frame: Report annually
Objective: Report annually on accomplishing the goals, policies, and programs that fulfill state law requirements.
The City prepared an annual report to the City Council on Housing Element implementation achievements each year.
Delete
Oxnard Housing Element
Page A-22 October 2022
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
Program 22: Reasonable Accommodation
The City of Oxnard will continue to process requests for reasonable accommodation which are reviewed on a staff level. The City will revise Consideration 7 under Section 15-501.5 in the Reasonable Accommodation Division 17 to remove discretion from the procedure, and will consider reducing the fee for a reasonable accommodation permit.
Responsibility: Development Services, Housing Department Funding: General Fund
Time Frame: Amend Section 15-501.5 of Division 17 Reasonable Accommodation by 2017. Review requests for reasonable accommodation as they are received.
Objective: Continue to implement reasonable accommodation ordinance for disabled persons.
The zoning code was revised at the time of Housing Element adoption in 2017 to remove Consideration 7 from the
Reasonable Accommodation Procedure findings. Community
Development continued to process requests for reasonable accommodation, which are reviewed on a staff level, and approved six Reasonable Accommodation permits in 2018
and 2019.
Amend to remove
completed part of
program and
continue
Program 23: Special Needs Groups
The City has a number of incentives to encourage the production of housing to meet the needs of special needs populations, such as the elderly and persons with physical and developmental disabilities. These include modification of development standards. The City will seek funding for special groups with specific demonstrated needs through federal, state, and local housing assistance programs through the Ventura County Housing Authority. Where unmet needs are demonstrated, the City will give preference in its funding decisions to projects addressing special housing needs.
Through the Continuum of Care (CoC), the City will continue to cooperate and work with other governmental and non-governmental organizations to encourage, promote, and facilitate the provision of emergency shelters, transitional housing, and housing to meet other special housing needs.
Through the collaborative efforts of the Continuum of Care, the City will continue to assess the magnitude of the homeless problem and to coordinate and promote housing assistance programs for the homeless.
The City will promote the use of community facilities and continue to work with service agencies to provide short-term emergency housing for the homeless. The City will continue to encourage and work with and assist nonprofit housing development corporations to promote, assist, or sponsor housing for the homeless. The City will also explore the feasibility of using its CDBG to provide seed money to assist nonprofit agencies in these efforts. Through its Zoning Code, the City will continue to provide In 2018, a web-platform was established to open a waitlist exclusively for homeless applicants when needed. All
applicants were given an opportunity to apply to the waitlists.
The application allowed for someone to indicate if they are homeless.
Oxnard Housing Authority (OHA) began the process of
selection and issuing vouchers. A total of 50 vouchers were issued to applicants who met the homeless set aside
eligibility criteria. In addition, resources were allocated to allow for a staff member to provide intensive housing search support to the program participants.
During 2019, the Ormond Beach Villas project was finalized.
The project targets highly vulnerable/low-income veterans in need of affordable housing. The OHA has committed project- based vouchers for each of the units. The OHA partnered with the Housing Authority of the City of San Buenaventura and Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura to apply for the Mainstream Voucher funding opportunity, which
targets non-elderly persons with disabilities transitioning out of institutional settings and at risk of becoming homeless. The grant was approved.
In 2020, OHA adopted a preference that allows a total of 15 housing choice vouchers (very-low income) to be set aside each fiscal year for applicants who meet the definition of Continue
A. Review and Revise Previous Policies and Goals
October 2022 Page A-23
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
opportunities for sites to accommodate emergency shelters and transitional housing.
Responsibility: Development Services, Housing Department Funding: General Fund, HUD, FESG, EHAP, CDBG, United Way, Federal Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS, California Child Care Facilities Finance Program, and other state and federal programs designated specifically for special needs groups
Time Frame: Identify funding opportunities annually and/or as funding becomes available
Objective: Work to identify funding and assist in addressing the housing needs of special needs groups.
homelessness. Following a revamping of efforts to increase utilization, a total of 31 applicants have secured housing and 21 have been issued a Housing Choice Voucher and are
currently searching for a unit.
The AAHOP Cypress Gardens project, approved in 2018,
included 30 single and one-bedroom units for special needs residents who are extremely low income. In 2019, the
Housing Department issued Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation a conditional letter of approval to provide gap- financing with the use of federal HOME funds for construction of a 42-unit farmworker housing development, which will include some units that will be reserved for extremely low- income households.
The Vagabond Inn is being acquired by private developers to convert to permanent supportive housing.
Program 24: Mobile Home Park Conversion Ordinance
State law regulates the conversion of mobile home parks to condominium ownership. To approve a conversion, the City must determine that the proposed conversion conforms to state law and that the conversion has resident support, per state law. Several park-conversion court case decisions are available that could impact the City’s conversion process and application of state law. The City will review conversion case law and modify the conversion code and/or administrative procedures as necessary.
Responsibility: Development Services, City Attorney
Funding: General Fund
Time Frame: Annually
Objective: Clarify the mobile home park condominium conversion process based on recent case law.
The City has not completed A review of recent case law
pertaining to conversions of mobile home parks to
condominium ownership to determine if there is a need to modify the mobile home conversion code and/or
administrative procedures for mobile home park conversions.
Continue
Program 25: Annexation
To ensure the City has enough land to meets its RHNA, the City is evaluating the potential development and annexation of the Teal Club Specific Plan site of about 174 acres. The time frame for next steps toward annexation includes:
• Draft EIR public review period – early 2015, completed. • Project revised due to School District review in mid- 2017 The Teal Club Specific Plan (TSCP) annexation application has begun moving forward with the Oxnard School District acquiring a portion of the site for a Middle School. The TSCP Draft EIR was circulated in early 2016 and the entitlement began again starting with an update of the Draft EIR. If the project and annexation are approved, some number of
Amend to add Rio
Urbana and
continue
Oxnard Housing Element
Page A-24 October 2022
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
• City consideration in 2018
If development and annexation is approved by the City, annexation approval by LAFCo in 2019. The Teal Club Specific Plan will allow the development up to 990 housing units in a range of densities and affordability. Although affordability has not yet been determined; there are 230 units in planning areas that allow up to 30 units per acre, which may be counted toward meeting the RHNA.
If the Teal Club site is not approved by City Council by 2018, in 2019 the City will pursue other options to meet the remaining RHNA. The following are options the City may consider:
• Development and annexation of up to 20 acres per year of 100 percent affordable housing without requiring voter approval (SOAR exemption) • Development of the Northeast Community Specific Plan Phase III Urban Village
• Additional sites to receive AAHOP zoning identified during the comprehensive 2030 General Plan consistency rezoning program.
Responsibility: Housing Department, Community Development Funding: General Fund
Time Frame: Annexation within 18 months of Housing Element adoption; Consider alternative approaches if annexation doesn’t occur by 2018.
Objective: Allow additional capacity to meet the City’s RHNA.
affordable units would likely be counted in the next Housing Element planning period, 2021 to 2029.
In 2018, the Rio School District filed an annexation request for an 11-acre surplus school site that included 167
condominium housing units and 20 affordable units required by the City’s inclusionary ordinance. The Planning
Commission recommended approval on November 21, 2019,
and the City Council approved the project in February 2020.
The application was submitted for review by the local area formation commission (LAFCO) in 2020.
Program 26: AAHOP Monitoring Program
In an ongoing effort to encourage the development of housing for lower- income households and to ensure the AAHOP does not constrain the development of affordable housing, the City will annually monitor the effectiveness of the AH additive zone including the following: review the feasibility of the 100 percent affordability requirement, and ensure consistency with the intended use of the program.
Based on the outcome of the review, the City will revise the program as necessary. The City will also maintain a list and map of AAHOP sites, updating it annually or in conjunction with project entitlements that remove AAHOP sites from the inventory and reduce the available opportunities below the remaining RHNA target.
Responsibility: Housing Department, Community Development Funding: General Fund
The City adopted the 2013–2021 Mid-Cycle Housing Element update in October 2017 to comply with conditional
certification requirements from HCD (March 27, 2017). The update addressed Housing Element Program No. 25
Annexation, and Program No. 26 AAHOP Monitoring. The
update process included a stakeholder survey in April 2017 and Planning Commission study sessions in April and June 2017.
In 2017, the City codified AAHOP into the municipal code and amended the ordinance to allow for-sale as well as rental units, and up to 25 percent moderate units capped by the remaining RHNA need for moderate. The City completed a
consistency rezoning program to change zoning to match
2030 General Plan land use designations and AAHOP
designations within the recently adopted 2013–2021 Housing Element. In October 2017, the AAHOP inventory was
Delete
A. Review and Revise Previous Policies and Goals
October 2022 Page A-25
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
Time Frame: Update AAHOP site list and map annually; continue to refine the AAHOP program annually and as needed
Objective: Ensure the AAHOP does not constrain the development of affordable housing.
updated to reflect the loss of AAHOP sites to other uses and to add new AAHOP sites, resulting in a revised AAHOP
inventory of 2,067 potential units. To accommodate 264 very- low and low-income RHNA units, Housing Element Program
No. 3 AAHOP was revised to include rezoning of
approximately 11 acres to AAHOP to facilitate the
development of housing for lower income. As recommended by HCD, the City also added Housing Element Program 31 to promote development of AAHOP projects on City-owned
sites and assist potential developers with AAHOP sites. The revised inventory includes 25 City-owned parcels totaling
4.17 acres.
As stated above, one AAHOP project was entitled in 2019 for a total of 20 units, including 4 lower-income units. A
previously approved AAHOP project, Gateway Apartments,
has been completed with 237 affordable units.
The City has evaluated options to address housing needs moving forward, including meeting the 6th Cycle RHNA and the AAHOP program is no longer the best mechanism to
achieve those goals. The AAHOP program will be
discontinued.
Program 27: Large Households
In order to assist with the high percentage of households living in overcrowded situations, the City will encourage and/or condition developments to add additional bedrooms and will consider prioritizing the use of CDBG funds for rental projects, provided that some of the units have three or more bedrooms.
Responsibility: Development Services, Housing Department Funding: General Fund, CDBG
Time Frame: As project applications are submitted
Objective: Assist in the development of larger units to accommodate larger households
The City continued to encourage developments to add
additional bedrooms. However, developers have reported
that there is a strong demand for smaller units for newly formed households of roommates, young couples with no
children, and 'empty-nesters.'
In 2019, a 40-unit 100-percent affordable veterans rental development was completed (Ormond Beach Villas), the
Housing Department provided gap-financing with the use of in-lieu affordable housing funds and federal HOME funds for seven of the units built, one of the seven units included a three-bedroom unit, intended for a large family.
The proposed Etting Road Apartments, a 42-unit 100-percent affordable farmworker development will include three-
bedroom units. The Las Cortes Phase II development is
currently working toward securing funding for the
development; once all funding is secured, the development will begin construction and will include three-bedroom units.
Continue
Oxnard Housing Element
Page A-26 October 2022
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
Program 28: Extremely Low-Income Households
To address the housing needs of extremely low-income households, the City will encourage the development of housing suitable for extremely low- income households (i.e., single-room occupancy units, transitional housing). Activities include assisting with site identification and acquisition, local financial resources, assisting and streamlining entitlements, and providing concessions and incentives. The City will meet with local nonprofit developers throughout the planning period. The reuse of shipping containers will be evaluated as a means to create temporary or permanent affordable small housing units.
Responsibility: Housing Department, Development Services Funding: General Fund, CDBG
Time Frame: Look for opportunities to develop or facilitate extremely low- income units at least annually
Objective: Comply with AB 2634.
The City continued to encourage the development of housing suitable for extremely low-income households (i.e., single- room occupancy units, transitional housing). The Housing Department continued to look for opportunities to provide gap-financing to developers of housing units targeting
extremely low-income households.
The AAHOP Cypress Gardens project, approved in 2018,
included 30 single and one-bedroom units for special needs residents who are extremely low income. In 2019, the
Housing Department issued Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation a conditional letter of approval to provide gap- financing with the use of Federal HOME funds for
construction of a 42-unit farmworker housing development, which will include some units that will be reserved for extremely low-income households.
In 2020, the City entered into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with a developer to negotiate the terms of a
Disposition and Development Agreement for the construction of a mixed-use building that will include a navigation center with a 110-bed shelter, office space, and 100 percent
affordable
Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) rental units.
The property is currently owned by the City. The address is 241 W. 2nd Street. Once developed, the PSH units will
target formerly homeless households, most of which will have extremely low incomes. The development is currently in the process of obtaining entitlements.
The Central Terrace Apartments, an 87-unit 100 percent
affordable development, is currently in process of obtaining entitlements, once developed the development will target tenants at 3, 50, and 60 percent AMI.
The City evaluated shipping containers as a housing option and did not support this as an affordable housing option due to Building Code and health and safety issues.
Amend to include
looking into
shipping containers
as housing and to
emphasize fair
housing and
continue
A. Review and Revise Previous Policies and Goals
October 2022 Page A-27
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
Program 29: Review of Parking Standards
The City will continue to allow reduced parking requirements for senior and affordable housing projects as well as pursue the following revisions to the City’s parking standards to more easily accommodate higher densities on multifamily and mixed-use sites in all zoning districts. Further study of these revisions will be conducted before changes to the Zoning Code are made.
• Reductions in the number of spaces required for affordable or senior housing projects, if it can be demonstrated that the expected tenants will own fewer cars than the regular standards anticipate, or if spaces will not be “pre-assigned” to specific units in the project. • Allowances for some of the spaces to be tandem or uncovered, provided that none of the spaces extend into the front yard setback. • Standards for “shared parking” when uses with different peaking characteristics (such as offices and apartments) are combined in a single structure.
• Reductions to the space requirements for studio and one-bedroom apartments (presently 2 spaces per unit).
• Review of off-street covered parking requirements, including garage requirements for second units.
When parking studies are required for congregate living facilities, community care facilities and small residential care facilities for disabled persons, the City will conduct the study with the goal of encouraging these uses and monitoring any constraints to allowing resulting from the parking study and resulting requirements. The City will also monitor the impacts of these parking studies and report every two years on any constraints identified in their annual Housing Element report to HCD.
By 2018 the City will establish fixed parking requirements for congregate living facilities, community care facilities and small residential care facilities for disabled persons so that a parking studies are no longer needed or required for these uses. By 2018 the City will also make revisions to parking requirements to remove constraints based on the issues studied, as described above.
As part of the research into Program 9, Farmworker Housing, the City may consider revising parking requirements for the range of farmworker housing uses that may be defined by the program, leading to zoning code amendments in late 2017 or early 2018.
During 2018, the Planning Division prepared the ADU zone text amendment that included clarification of parking
requirements consistent with State law (see Program 6).
Multifamily projects in the City are generally reducing guest parking, utilizing tandem parking, and using more surface parking as the projects qualify for Density Bonus parking standards by complying with the City's 10 percent
inclusionary requirements. The City will continue to allow reduced parking requirements for senior and affordable
housing projects with approval of a parking study as well as shared parking when uses with different peaking
characteristics (such as offices and apartments) are
combined in a single structure.
The City monitored the impacts of these parking studies and reported every two years on any constraints identified in their annual Housing Element report to HCD. The new Downtown
Code was approved in 2019 that revised parking
requirements to provide and manage parking facilities that serve an area rather than lot by lot to create a park-once pedestrian district and reduce the parking burden for
individual projects. The new Downtown Code significantly reduced parking requirements for residential uses in the downtown and allowed payment into an in-lieu fee for
meeting parking requirements within the district parking facilities. The combined effect of form based code and
managed parking in the downtown has resulted in several new housing developments in the downtown with densities between 100 and 125 dwelling units per acre. .
The City did not establish fixed parking requirements for congregate living facilities, community care facilities and small residential care facilities for disabled persons, nor explore the feasibility of an ordinance that would prohibit the long-term storage of cars in designated parking spaces in multifamily complexes.
Amend to remove
completed part of
program and
continue
Oxnard Housing Element
Page A-28 October 2022
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
In addition, the City should explore the feasibility of an ordinance that would prohibit the long-term storage of cars in designated parking spaces in multifamily complexes, thereby ensuring that the spaces may remain available for tenant use.
The City will also evaluate the associated costs with the current parking requirements to ensure they are not a constraint on development.
In addition, under Government Code 65915(p), any project that is eligible for a density bonus is entitled to use the alternative parking standards set forth in the statute, regardless of whether the applicant applies for a density bonus. The applicant has to request that the City apply the statutory parking standards.
Responsibility: Housing Department, Community Development Funding: General Fund
Time Frame: Amend parking requirements by 2017 and monitor and report every two years.
Objective: Continue to review alternative parking requirements in all zoning districts.
Program 30: Large Site Program
The City will provide for the inclusion of mixed-income housing in future new growth areas of the city through development agreements and other mechanisms. To facilitate the development of affordable housing on smaller parcels (50 to 150 units in size), the City will routinely give high priority to processing subdivision maps that include affordable housing units. Also, an expedited review process will be available for the subdivision of larger sites into buildable lots where the development application can be found consistent with the General Plan, applicable Specific Plan, and master environmental impact report.
Responsibility: Housing Department, Development Services Funding: General Fund
Time Frame: As project applications are submitted
Objective: Assist with large site development.
During the planning period, Community Development staff worked closely with the Oxnard Union High School District and owners of a 107-acre vacant parcel (Maulhardt) to
identify requirements and opportunities for affordable
housing. This site has been annexed into the City.
Community Development staff also worked closely with the Rio School District, owner of an 10.24-acre parcel contiguous to City limits for annexation and inclusion of affordable housing. This project received Planning Commission
recommended approval on November 21, 2019, and the City Council approved in February 2020. The application was
submitted for LAFCO review in 2020.
Continue
A. Review and Revise Previous Policies and Goals
October 2022 Page A-29
Programs Implementation Status
Continue, Amend
and Continue or,
Delete in 2021-
2029 Housing
Element
Program 31: City Owned Sites and AAHOP Developer Assistance The City’s list of sites with the –AH (AAHOP) designation includes 25 parcels that are owned by the City, totaling 4.17 acres. These parcels make up a portion or all of five AAHOP sites A-03, A-08, B-04, B-14, and B-18. Four of these sites are in former Redevelopment areas and are administered by the Successor Agency. Successor Agency parcels are subject to disposition in connection with the Long Range Property Management Plan. City-owned parcels not administered by the Successor Agency are generally subject to the California Surplus Lands Act. The City would consider other alternatives for the use of City-owned parcels within AAHOP projects. One alternative would be for applicants to work with Development Services, Economic Development, and the Housing Departments to facilitate the application process on City-owned and other AAHOP sites.
Through website promotion of the City’s Affordable Housing Ordinances/Programs and collaboration with the aforementioned departments the City will ensure information and assistance is provided about opportunities to develop affordable housing on AAHOP sites.
Specifically, the City would include information about opportunities for affordable housing on AAHOP sites, assistance developing AAHOP projects on City-owned land, and/ or for projects with State Density Bonuses, in one place on its website. Contact information for the Housing Department and Planning Division would also be included in the same place on the website for interested parties to contact for further assistance.
The City would also disseminate information about this available assistance annually to local affordable housing developers and advocates.
Responsibility: Development Services
Funding: General Fund
Time Frame: Promote awareness of availability of City-owned AAHOP sites and provide assistance to applicants on an ongoing basis; disseminate information on technical assistance annually.
Objective: Promote development of AAHOP projects on City-owned sites and assist potential developers with AAHOP projects.
During 2018, the City retained consultants to prepare a form- based zoning code for the Central Business
District/Downtown as part of an enhanced effort to generate housing and commercial development in and around the
downtown area. As part of the planning process, several City- owned and/or Successor Agency parcels in the downtown
were identified for consolidation and development. In 2018, an RFP was issued for concept proposals but the RFP
process was ultimately unsuccessful and the City purchased the Plaza Park properties from the Successor Agency
(laundromat, furniture store, and Social Security buildings).
Proposed development on City-owned property includes a
mixed-use building that will include a navigation center with a 110-bed shelter, office space, and 100-percent affordable Permanent Supportive Housing rental units (Phase II of the Las Cortes Development). A 109-unit 100 percent affordable rental housing development will be located on Housing
Authority Owned Property. The Housing Department will also work to develop future RFPs for other City, Housing
Authority, and Successor Agency- owned properties.
Community Development has continued website promotion of the City’s Affordable Housing Ordinances/Programs and
collaborated with other departments within the City to ensure information and assistance is provided about opportunities to develop affordable housing on AAHOP sites.
Specifically, the City maintained information about
opportunities for affordable housing on AAHOP sites,
assistance developing AAHOP projects on City-owned land, and/ or for projects with State Density Bonuses, in one place on its website. Contact information for the Housing
Department and Planning Division is also included in the same place on the website for interested parties to contact for further assistance.
While the AAHOP program will be discontinued, the City will continue to promote opportunities for affordable housing unit development on City owned sites and sites identified in the City’s Housing Element inventory.
Amend to remove
AAHOP and
continue
Oxnard Housing Element
Page A-30 October 2022
This page intentionally left blank.
B
E XISTING HOUSING N EEDS
October 2022 Page B-1
The purpose of this chapter is to examine historic and current data that shape current and near future housing needs in Oxnard that are required by the 2021– 2029 Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). Selected data are updated through 2021.
B.1 Data Sources
The City collected data sources for this Housing Needs Assessment primarily from the United States ( US) 2010 Decennial Census, the 2014 –2018 American Community Survey (ACS), and the California Department of Finance (DOF). The Decennial Census, which is completed every 10 years, is the preferred data source, as it provides the most reliable and in -depth data for basic demographic characteristics of a locality. This report uses the 2010 Census for current information and the 2000 Census to assess changes since the year 2000. The DOF data is more current than the 2010 Census. However, the DOF does not provide the depth of information that can be found in the US Census and ACS da ta.
Whenever possible, DOF data and other local sources were used in the assessment of both e xisting housing needs ( this chapter) and special housing needs (Chapter C) to provide an accurate profile of the community.
The 2010 Census did not collect information in several categories that are required for the discussions of existing housing needs and special housing needs. Where this is the case, historical DOF data is used. Where DOF data is not available, information from the 2000 Census is retained. In cases where this is not feasible or useful, this assessment references ACS data. The ACS provides estimates of numerous housing-related indicators based on samples averaged over a five-year period. Whereas the US Census provides complete counts of various demographic Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-2 October 2022
indicators, the ACS provides estimates based on statistically significant samples.
Although the City of Oxnard provides a sample size of over 200,000, the estimates reported by the ACS have varying margins of error. Where ACS data is used, the numbers should not be interpreted as absolute fact but rather as a tool to illustrate a general characteristic, proportion, or scale. Five-year 2015-2019 ACS data are used in certain tables. Use of the 2014-2018 ACS dataset is allowed by HCD and changes between the two datasets are considered less than significant for purposes of the 2021-2029 Housing Element.
B.2 Demographic, Employment, and Housing Characteristics
DEMOGRAPHIC (POPULATION) CHARACTERISTICS
The California DOF estimated the population of Ventura County to be 842,886 in January 2020. the county’s ten incorporated cities, including Oxnard, account for approximately 89 percent of the C ounty’s population. Oxnard’s 2020 population (206,352) accounted for 24 percent of the County’s population. Tables B-1 through B-3 present the population estimates and growth rates for Oxnard, Ventura County, and California as a whole from 1990 to 2020. Growth trends for Ventura County’s incorporated cities are listed in Table B-4.
Oxnard’s population growth rate exceeded the growth rate in Ventura County between 2010 and 2020 but fell behind the state’s growth rate. Between 2010 and 2020, Oxnard had the fourth highest growth rate of all cities in Ventura County (Fillmore and Santa Paula had equivalent growth rates) . While California and Ventura County grew from 2010 to 2020 at rates of 7 percent and 2 percent, respectively, Oxnard’s growth rate was approximately 4 percent.
Table B-1 Oxnard Population Growth Trends
Year Population Numerical
Change Percentage Change Average Annual
Growth Rate
1990 142,560
2000 170,358 27,798 19% 2%
2005 187,705 17,347 10% 2%
2010 197,899 10,194 5% 1%
2013 201,023 3,124 2% <1%
2020 206,352 5,329 3% <1%
Source: Population data from the California Department of Finance 2013 [and 2020] and 2010 Census, including calculations for 2005 and earlier by Matrix Design Group
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-3
Table B-2 Ventura County Population Growth Trends
Year Population Numerical
Change Percentage Change Average Annual
Growth Rate
1990 669,016
2000 753,197 84,181 13% 1%
2005 809,286 56,089 7% 1%
2010 823,318 14,032 2% <1%
2020 842,886 19,568 2% <1%
Source: Population data from the California Department of Finance 2020 and 2010 Census, including calculations for 2005 and earlier by Matrix Design Group
Table B-3 California Population Growth Trends
Year Population Numerical
Change Percentage Change Average Annual
Growth Rate
1990 29,758,213
2000 33,873,086 4,114,873 14% 1%
2005 36,676,931 2,803,845 8% 2%
2010 37,253,956 577,025 2% <1%
2020 39,782,870 2,528,914 7% 1%
Source: Population data from the California Department of Finance 2020 and 2010 Census, including calculations for 2005 and earlier by Matrix Design Group
Table B-4 Population Trends in Neighboring Jurisdictions Jurisdiction Name 2000 2010 Change
(2000 to 2010) 2020 Change
(2010 to 2020)
California 33,873,086 37,253,956 10% 39,782,870 7%
Ventura County 753,197 823,318 9% 842,886 2%
Camarillo 57,084 65,201 14% 70,261 8%
Fillmore 13,643 15,002 10% 15,566 4%
Moorpark 31,415 34,421 10% 36,278 5%
Ojai 7,862 7,461 -5% 7,557 1%
Oxnard 170,358 197,899 16% 206,352 4%
Port Hueneme 21,845 21,723 -1% 23,607 9%
San Buenaventura 100,916 106,433 5% 106,276 0%
Santa Paula 28,598 29,321 3% 30,389 4%
Simi Valley 111,351 124,237 12% 125,115 1%
Thousand Oaks 117,005 126,683 8% 126,484 0%
Source: Table E-5 Population data from the California Department of Finance 2010, 2020
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-4 October 2022
Population Forecast
On May 7, 2020, the Southern California Association of Governments ( SCAG) adopted long-term growth forecasts for the 2016 –2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. These forecasts anticipate an approximate expected growth of 16 percent in the City of Oxnard’s population from 2016 to 2045, with an increase from 206,000 residents in 2016 to 238,100 residents in 2045. From 2016 to 2045, the city is expected to grow at less than one percent a year. The Oxnard population forecast is shown in Table B-5 and is based largely on the City’s 2030 General Plan and conservative growth rate estimates after the year 2030 that were provided by City staff to SCAG.
Table B-5 Oxnard Population Forecast
Year Population Numerical
Change Percentage Change Average Annual
Growth Rate
2016 206,000 — — —
2045 238,100 32,100 16% <1%
Source: SCAG 2020 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, Table 14, 2016–2045.
Age Characteristics
Three age clusters are important in projecting existing and future housing need :
children and young adults up to age 20, adults between ages 20 and 64, and the senior population age 65 and older. As reported in the 2010 Census for Oxnard, the population under the age of 20 was 33 percent (65,938), the adult population was almost 58 percent (115,543 people), and the senior population was approximately eight percent (16,418) (see Table B-6). Between 2010 and 2018, the median age of the Oxnard population in creased from 29.9 to 32.1 years old. The 2018 senior population increased to approximately 10 percent of the populati on from eight percent in 2010, while the percentage of adults between ages 20 and 64 increased from 2010 to 2018, from 58 to 64 percent of the total population. The proportion of the population 19 years or younger declined from 33 percent in 2010 to 30 percent in 2018. Overall, the population distribution of Oxnard remained relatively stable from 2010 to 2018.
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-5
Table B-6 Oxnard Population by Age, 2010 and 2018
Age
Group
2010 2018
Number Percentage Group
Percentage Number Percentage Group
Percentage
0–9 years 33,502 17%
33%
31,554 15%
30%
10–19 years 32,436 16% 31,151 15%
20–24 years 16,993 9%
58%
16,920 8%
64%
25–34 years 31,237 16% 32,731 16%
35–44 years 26,729 13% 28,488 14%
45–54 years 23,664 12% 25,885 12%
55–59 years 9,456 5% 20,617 10%
60–64 years 7,464 4% 9,164 4%
65–74 years 9,090 5%
8%
11,652 6%
10% 75–84 years 5,428 3% 6,031 3%
85+ years 1,900 1% 2,539 1%
Median Age 29.9 32.1
Note: Not 100% due to rounding.
Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Population and Housing; 2014-2018 American Community Survey - S0101 Self-Reported Race and Hispanic Origin
According to the 2019 ACS, the Oxnard race/Hispanic Origin composition was 73 percent Hispanic, 13 percent Non-Hispanic White, 2 percent African American, 8 percent Asian and Pacific Islander, less than 1 percent Indian/Native American, and 3 percent all other races (see Table B-7). Race and Hispanic Origin are self - reported by the public in all Census Bureau data. The Hispanic Origin population includes a wide range of people in terms of their citizenship status, length of residency in Oxnard (temporary or permanent) , linguistic isolation, income, and housing need. Table B-7 may show an increase in the population count for Hispanic Origin but a decrease in percentage of the total population.
At 73 percent of Oxnard’s population in 2010, Oxnard’s Hispanic population was approximately double the percentage of Hispanics in Ventura County overall.
Between 2010 and 2019, the Hispanic and Asian populations in Oxnard grew by 5 percent and 26 percent, respectively. While the percentages of Hispanics and Asians in Ventura County increased from 2010 to 2019, these populations comprise a smaller percentage of the total population in Ventura County. The proportion of the total White population in Ventura County was more than triple that of Oxnard in 2019, at 45 percent of the Ventura County population compared to 13 percent in Oxnard. In the city overall, the population of Hispanics, African Americans, Asians, and all other groups , excepting Native Americans, grew. Note that a person identifying as Hispanic may be of any one or more than one race.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-6 October 2022
Table B-7 Race and Hispanic Origin Profile for Oxnard and Ventura County, 2010-2019 Race/Hispanic Origin
2010 2019 Percentage
Change,
2010–2019 Persons Percentage Persons Percentage
City of Oxnard
Hispanic 145,551 74% 153,141 73% 5%
White 29,410 15% 26,786 13% -9%
African American 4,754 2% 5,191 2% 9%
Indian/Native American 424 <1% 253 <1% -40%
Asian 14,084 7% 17,735 8% 26%
All Other 3,676 2% 5,769 3% 57%
TOTAL 197,899 100% 208,875 100% 6%
Ventura County
Hispanic 331,567 40% 365,835 43% 10%
White 400,868 49% 376,524 45% -6%
African American 13,082 2% 15,062 2% 15%
Indian/Native American 2,389 <1% 1,639 <1% -31%
Asian 54,099 7% 62,586 7% 16%
All Other 21,313 3% 24,360 3% 14%
TOTAL 823,318 100% 846,006 100% 3%
Source: Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), 2010 Census; 2015 -2019 American Community Survey - DP05
EMPLOYMENT TRENDS
Projecting employment growth identifies the projected need for additional housing for employees. The assumption is that the labor force will match the number of jobs available. If the local labor force is not adequate, in- migration is assumed, which triggers additional demand for housing.
Job-Generating Areas of Employment
Between 2009 and 2018, the overall number of jobs in Oxnard increased by approximately 22 percent (see Table B-8). The largest decrease in jobs was in the information sector (a decrease of 21 percent). There were significant increases in the agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining industries; which increased over 70 percent. It is expected this was largely due to jobs in the ag riculture industry.
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-7
Table B-8 Oxnard Employment by Industry, 2009 and 2018
Industry Type
2009 2018 Percentage
Increase
(2009 to
2018) Number Percentage Number Percentage
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting,
and mining 7,990 10% 14,319 15% 79%
Construction 6,000 7% 5,880 6% -2%
Manufacturing 10,439 13% 11,544 12% 11%
Wholesale trade 3,093 4% 3,410 3% 10%
Retail trade 8,455 10% 11,067 11% 31%
Transportation, warehousing, and utilities 3,366 4% 3,696 4% 10% Information 1,390 2% 1,100 1% -21%
Finance, insurance, real estate, rental and
leasing 4,089 5% 4,774 5% 17%
Professional, scientific, management,
administration 7,842 10% 8,802 9% 12%
Educational, health and social services 11,839 15% 15,955 16% 35% Arts, entertainment, recreation, and
services 6,240 8% 8,577 9% 37%
Other services 5,366 7% 4,990 5% -7%
Public administration 4,431 6% 4,538 5% 2%
TOTAL JOBS 80,540 100% 98,652 100% 22%
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 51,191 — 51,460 — —
Source: American Fact Finder for 2009 data; 2014-2018 American Community Survey - DP03 As shown in Table B-9, the California Employment Development Department (EDD) identifies the four largest employers in Oxnard: St. John’s Regional Medical Center, Haas Automation Inc, J.M. Smucker, and Oxnard College. The number of employees at these business es ranges between 500 and 4,999. Naval Base Ventura County, located in Port Hueneme, is also a large employer.
Table B-9 Ventura County Large Employers Located in Oxnard Employer Location Industry Number of
Employees
St. Johns Regional Medical Center Oxnard Hospital 1,000–4,999 Haas Automation Inc Oxnard Computers-Electronic-Manufacturers 500-999 Oxnard College Oxnard Academic 500–999
J.M. Smucker Oxnard Food Products & Manufacturers 500–999 Source: California Employment Development Department 2020
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-8 October 2022
Median annual earnings in Oxnard vary. According to the 2020 Occupational Employment Statistics Survey by the California EDD, the occupation category with the highest annual earnings in the Greater Oxnard Area is Management Occupations, with median annual earnings of $ 126,737. Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations as well as Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations made up the lowest earning industries, with mean annual earnings of $30,070 and $30,335, respectively. Mean wages by occupational group are shown in Table B -10. For all occupations in the Greater Oxnard Area , mean annual earnings were $57,237 in 2020.
Table B-10 Oxnard- Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA, 2020 Mean Annual Earnings by Occupation Occupation Total Mean Annual Earnings
Total Occupations 316,670 $57,237
Management Occupations 17,540 $126,737
Business and Financial Operations Occupations 17,650 $81,155 Computer and Mathematical Occupations 7,320 $98,917
Architecture and Engineering Occupations 7,920 $94,341
Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations 3,630 $91,358 Community and Social Service Occupations 5,640 $61,961
Legal Occupations 1,920 $125,097
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations 20,550 $64,995 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations 3,640 $62,319 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations 15,290 $97,395 Healthcare Support Occupations 16,110 $34,044
Protective Service Occupations 5,470 $68,427
Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations 32,430 $30,335 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations 8,870 $36,619 Personal Care and Service Occupations 7,730 $37,793
Sales and Related Occupations 34,680 $44,006
Office and Administrative Support Occupations 40,220 $45,507 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations 6,230 $30,070 Construction and Extraction Occupations 13,390 $59,295
Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations 9,780 $53,453 Production Occupations 18,760 $43,147
Transportation and Material Moving Occupations 21,870 $37,247 Mean Annual Earnings $57,237
Source: California Employment Development Department - Occupational Employment (May 2019) & Wage (2010 – 1st Quarter) Data:
Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) Survey Results: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA MSA, 2020.
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-9
From 2016 to 2045, jobs are projected to increase by 16 percent, or 54,700 jobs countywide (see Table B-11). For Oxnard, employment is projected to increase by 25 percent from 2016 to 2045, adding 15,000 new jobs to the city.
Table B-11 Ventura County and Oxnard Employment Project ions, 2016 to 2045 Jurisdiction
Annual Average Employment Employment Change
2016 2045 Numerical Percentage
Oxnard 61,100 76,100 15,000 25%
Ventura County 334,700 389,400 54,700 16%
Source: 2020 SCAG RTP/SCS, Table 14
Commute Patterns
Commute distance, travel time , and direction of travel are important factor s in housing availability and affordability and are also an indicator of jobs/housing balance. Communities with extended commutes generally have a poor jobs/housing balance, while communities with short average commutes tend to have a strong jobs/housing balance. The burden of the additional costs associated with extended commuting disproportionately affects lower-income households who must spend a larger portion of their overall income on fuel. This in turn affects a household’s ability to occupy decent housing without being overburdened by cost.
As shown in Table B-12, the majority of residents in Oxnard work in or near the city.
The commute time for approximately 71 percent of residents is less than 30 minutes, while approximately 30 percent of residents commute 30 minutes or more to work.
Table B-12 City of Oxnard, Travel time to Work
Travel Time to Work Number Percentage
Less than 30 minutes 66,019 71%
30 to 59 minutes 22,953 25%
60 or more minutes 4,645 5%
TOTAL 93,617 100%
Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey – B0803
Note: Total do not add to 100% due to rounding.
Table B-13 presents additional characteristics of employed residents in Oxnard. As of 2018, there are a total of 83,994 jobs within the City of Oxnard compared to 51,460 households in the city, a jobs to household ratio of 1.6:1 which is considered to be balanced to jobs -rich. In other words, there exists 1.63 jobs for every household in Oxnard,
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-10 October 2022
Table B-13 City of Oxnard, In- Area Labor Force, 2017/2018 Count
Total Jobs 83,994
Total Households 51,460
Jobs/Household Ratio 1.63
Source: US Census Bureau 2017, Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics, OnTheMap application ( http://onthemap.ces.census.gov), 2014-2018 American Community Survey – DP03 .
HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS
Household characteristics are an important component to understanding growth and the changing needs of a community. The US Census Bureau defines a household as all pe rsons who occupy a housing unit , which may include single persons living alone, families related through marriage or blood, and unrelated individuals living together. Persons living in retirement or convalescent homes, dormitories, or other group living situations are defined as living in “group quarters.”.
As shown in Table B-14 , Oxnard owner -occupied households increased by over 2,644 households (nine percent) between 2000 and 2018, while renter households increased by 5,240 households (25 percent). The total number of households in Oxnard in 2018 was 51,460.
Table B-14 Oxnard Households by Tenure, 2000 to 2018
2000 2009 2018
Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage
Owner 24,987 57% 28,314 57% 27,631 54%
Renter 18,589 43% 21,236 43% 23,829 46%
TOTAL 43,576 100% 49,550 100% 51,460 100%
Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey – Table B25007 Household Forecast
SCAG adopted long-term household forecasts for the region in the 2020 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. Table B-15 shows SCAG’s household forecast for Oxnard. Overall, SCAG forecasts that the number of households in Oxnard will grow by approximately 20 percent from 2016 through 2045. In 2045, Oxnard is expected to have a total of 61,600 households, representing the anticipated addition of approximately 10,400 new households in the 29-year period, or about 360 new households each year.
Table B-15 Oxnard Household Projections, 2016 to 2045
Number Percentage Change
2016 to 2045
2016 51,200 —
2045 61,600 20%
Source: SCAG 2020 Adopted RTP/SCS
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-11
B.3 Overpayment and Overcrowding
OVERPAYMENT
Overpayment occurs when all housing costs exceed a desirable maximum percentage of household income. When a household spends more than 30 percent of their gross income on housing, it is considered overpaying or cost burdened, according to US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines.
When paying 50 percent or more , a household falls into the category of severe overpayment. It is important to view overpayment in terms of tenure because renters, especially lower-income renters, tend to pay a larger percentage of their household income toward housing, which leaves less income for other necessities, such as food, clothing, transportation, and educatio n. For owners , the cost of housing tends to be more stable and declines over time, as mo rtgage payments remain constant while income grows.
Table B -16 shows to what extent occupied housing units (households) are overpaying for housing costs by tenure and whether or not they were overpaying or cost burdened (30 –50 percent of household income) or severely cost burdened (50+ percent of household income). Of all owner-occupied households, 31 percent were overpaying for housing costs in 2016 , with 54 percent of renter-occupied households were overpaying in 2016. This is a decrease from 45 percent of owner- occupied households overpaying and 57 percent of renter -occupied households overpaying in 2010. The most significant percentages in terms of overpayment in Oxnard were renters, with at least 12 percent of renters making between 31 and 80 percent of HUD Area Median Family Income (MFI; which is the median household income for all of Ventura County) experiencing overpayment.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-12 October 2022
Table B-16 Oxnard Households Overpaying by Income, 2016 Tenure
Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number
Percentage of Total
Owner-Occupied
Units
Number
Percentage of Total
Renter-Occupied
Units
Total Occupied Units 27,185 100% 23,655 100%
Total Units Overpaying 8,355 31% 12,780 54%
Occupied Units Paying 30%–50%
Extremely Low-Income <30% of HUD Area
Median Family Income (MFI) 175 1% 950 4%
Very Low-Income 31%–50% MFI 3,085 11% 2,780 12%
Low-Income 51%–80% MFI 1,935 7% 2,630 11%
Occupied Units Paying More Than 50%
Extremely Low-Income <30% MFI 1,355 5% 4,185 18%
Very Low-Income 31%–50% MFI 1,080 4% 1,690 7%
Low-Income 51%–80% MFI 725 3% 545 2%
Total Occupied Units
Extremely Low-Income <30% of HUD Area
Median Family Income (MFI) 2,210 8% 6,055 26%
Very Low-Income 31%–50% MFI 3,390 12% 5,325 23%
Low-Income 51%–80% MFI 5,620 21% 6,255 26%
Note: The total household count in this table is different than the household count used elsewhere in the Housing Element because this table uses CHAS data, not ACS data. The CHAS household count is used here to serve as a more accurate comparison to other CHAS data analyzed in this table.
Source: CHAS 2012-2016
OVERCROWDING
According to the US Census Bureau, overcrowding is defined as more tha n one person per room, excluding bathrooms, kitchens, hallways, porches, foyers, or half- rooms. When this figure exceeds 1.5 or more persons per roo m, the condition is considered severe. One thing to note is that infants and young children are counted as equivalent to adults in calculating overcrowding.
Various factors lead to overcrowding, but typically it is due to a lack of adequately sized housing units, high housing costs, or a lack of units affordable to all economic groups. Households with lower incomes are usually more affected, as they may opt for overcrowding themselves as a means to afford decent housing.
Renters are typically more heavily impacted by overcrowding than owners.
According to the 2014–2018 ACS, a total of 9,194 households experienced overcrowding in Oxnard, with 6,269 households considered overcrowded (1.01 to
1.50 persons per room) and 2,925 households considered severely overcrowded (1.51 persons or more per room). Of total overcrowded households, 6,839 were B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-13
renter-occupied ( 74 percent). Of the severely overcrowded households, 2,500 (85 percent) of those were renter -occupied. Approximately 18 percent of all households in Oxnard were considered overcrowded in 2018. Data on overcrowding is shown in Table B-17.
Table B-17 Oxnard Overcrowded Households, 2018
Persons per Room
Owner Renter Total
Households Percentage Households Percentage Households Percentage
1.00 or less 25,276 91% 16, 990 71% 42,266 82%
1.01 to 1.50 1,930 7% 4,339 18% 6,269 12%
1.51 or more 425 2% 2,500 10% 2,925 6%
TOTAL 27,631 100% 23,829 100% 51,460 100%
Percentage Overcrowded 9% 29% 18%
Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey - Table B25014 B.4 Income
The income earned by a household directly impacts a household’s ability to acquire sufficient and affordable housing. Lower-income households are not only limited by the housing they can afford but also experience an increased incidence of overpayment and overcrowding as income levels decrease.
To determine the allocation and use of public subsidies, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) created income categories based on the median family income (MFI), which is calculated by HUD. The 2020 MFI for a family of four in Ventura County is reported as $97,800. The income categories are defined as follows:
Extremely low-income households earn between 0 and 30 percent of the county MFI
Very low -income households earn between 31 and 50 percent of the county MFI
Low-income households earn between 51 and 80 percent of the county MFI
Moderate-income households earn between 81 and 120 percent of the county MFI
Above moderate-income households earn more than 120 percent of the county MFI
HCD’s housing affordability limits for Ventura County in 2020 are shown in Table B-
18. These limits identify income limits by household size and income level. Four - person households earning $ 33,850 annually or less would be considered extremely low-income, while a four -person household earning between $ 33,850 and $56,450 would be considered very low -income. In comparison, the threshold for low-income households of four persons is $90,350 annually, while the threshold Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-14 October 2022
for moderate-income households of four p ersons is $117,350. Table B-19 shows fair market rents established by HUD for Ventura County for the years 2019, 2020, and 2021.
Table B-18 Ventura County HCD Income Limits Summary, 2020 2020
Income
Limit
Area
MFI
2020
Income
Limit
Category
Persons
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Ventura
County $97,800
Extremely
Low
(< 30
%)
$23,700 $27,100 $30,500 $33,850 $36,600 $39,300 $42,000 $44,700 Very Low
(31-50%) $39,550 $45,200 $50,850 $56,450 $61,000 $65,500 $70,000 $74,550 Low
(51-80%) $63,250 $72,300 $81,350 $90,350 $97,600 $104,850 $112,050 $119,300 Median $68,450 $78,250 $88,000 $97,800 $105,600 $113,450 $121,250 $129,100 Moderate
(81-120%) $82,150 $93,900 $105,600 $117,350 $126,750 $136,150 $145,500 $154,900 Source: HCD 2020
Table B-19 Fair Market Rents in Ventura County, 2019–2021 Year Efficiency 1-Bedroom 2-Bedroom 3-Bedroom 4-Bedroom FY 2021 FMR $1,269 $1,519 $1,923 $2,690 $3,189
FY 2020 FMR $1,266 $1,503 $1,943 $2,709 $3,243
FY 2019 FMR $1,153 $1,362 $1,795 $2,518 $3,019
Source: HUD Fair Market Rent Documentation System, 2020
The 2020 MFI for a family of four in Ventura County is $97,800. For extremely low- income households, this calculates to an income of $33,850 or less for a four - person household, or $32,700 or less for a one- person household. Based on the 2020 HCD income limits (Table B-18), a very low-income household of four making $56,450 annual income could afford up to $1,411 a month for rent (see Table B-20 for housing affordabilit y statistics) . An extremely low -income household of four could afford up to $846 a month for rent. A four-person household in the low-income category could afford up to $2,259 a month for rent. Therefore, a four -person household in the low, very low and extremely low-income categories would not be able to afford the fair market rent for a 3- bedroom apartment in Ventura County.
Affordable housing ownership costs range from $163,903 for an extremely low- income household of four persons to $629,483 for a moderate-income household of four persons. According to Trulia, the average sales price of a three-bedroom home in Oxnard in late 2020 was $671,825. This was the most common sized home sold from November through December 2020. A home of this value would be nearly affordable to a moderate- income household of four, but unaffordable to low-, very low -, and extremely low -income households of four persons. The average-priced 3-bedroom house would only be affordable to an above-moderate income household of four persons.
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-15
Table B-20 Housing Affordability in Ventura County, 2020 Income Category 1-Person 2-Person 3-Person 4-Person
Extremely Low
Annual income limit $23,700 $27,100 $30,500 $33,850
Monthly income limit $1,975 $2,258 $2,542 $2,821
Max. monthly rent $593 $678 $763 $846
Max. sales price $80,290 $108,298 $136,307 $163,903
Very Low
Annual income limit $39,550 $45,200 $50,850 $56,450
Monthly income limit $3,296 $3,767 $4,238 $4,704
Max. monthly rent $989 $1,130 $1,271 $1,411
Max. sales price $210,858 $242,459 $272,767 $302,806
Low
Annual income limit $63,250 $72,300 $81,350 $90,350
Monthly income limit $5,271 $6,025 $6,779 $7,529
Max. monthly rent $1,581 $1,808 $2,034 $2,259
Max. sales price $339,282 $387,828 $436,373 $484,651
Moderate
Annual income limit $82,150 $93,900 $105,600 $117,350 Monthly income limit $6,846 $7,825 $8,800 $9,779
Max. monthly rent $2,054 $2,348 $2,640 $2,934
Max. sales price $472,885 $503,694 $566,454 $629,483
Source: HCD 2020 and Chase Affordability Calculator https://www.chase.com/personal/mortgage/calculators-resources/affordability-calculator Maximum monthly rent is assumed to be 30 percent of monthly household income Assumptions for maximum sales price include $500 in monthly expenses, 20 -percent down payment, property taxes and fees, and property insurance and 4.5-percent interest rate.
According to the 2014–2018 ACS (see Table B-21), there were 33,677 households (65 percent) earning more than $50,000 per year in Oxnard, the majority of which were made up of owners (63 percent) and a minority of renters (36 percent).
Approximately 13 percent of all households, or 6,750 households spec ifically, earned an annual household income below $25,000. The majority of these were renters (68 percent) with a minority of owners (32 percent).
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-16 October 2022
Table B-21 Household Income by Tenure, 2018
Owner Renter Total
Household Income Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage Below $10,000 538 2% 1,001 4% 1,539 3%
$10,000 to $14,999 390 1% 949 4% 1,339 3%
$15,000 to $19,999 586 2% 1,054 4% 1,640 3%
$20,000 to $24,999 662 2% 1,570 7% 2,232 4%
$25,000 to $34,999 1,446 5% 2,831 12% 4,277 8%
$35,000 to $49,999 2,620 9% 4,136 17% 6,756 13%
$50,000 to $74,999 5,299 19% 4,974 21% 10,273 20%
$75,000 to $99,999 4,872 18% 2,811 12% 7,683 15%
$100,000 to $149,999 6,026 22% 2,889 12% 8,915 17%
$150,000 or more 5,192 19% 1,614 7% 6,806 13%
TOTAL 27,631 100% 23,829 100% 51,460 100%
Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey - Table B25118 B.5 Extremely Low-Income Households and Housing Problems
EXISTING AND PROJECTED EXTREMELY LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLD
NEEDS
To better characterize the housing needs and constraints of the lower -income category, the extremely low-income category is used in this discussion. This income category is a subset of the very low-income category in terms of RHNA assigned to each income category. Extremely low-income households will likely face housing problems, such as overpaying, overcrowding, and/or accessibility issues as a result of their limited incomes. In addition, many extremely low-income households will fall within a special needs category (disabled, seniors, large families, or female-headed households) and require supportive housing services. In 2020 , there were approximately 6,849 extremely low-income households in Oxnard (ACS 2019 1- year estimate), which represented approximately 13 percent of total households. In comparison, Oxnard had similar proportions of very low - and low -income households, with 8,715 very low -income households ( 17 percent of total households) and 11,875 low-income households (23 percent).
HOUSING PROBLEMS FOR LOWER-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
Housing problem s include overpayment (discussed previously in Section B.3), overcrowding, or housing without complete kitchen or plumbing facilities. As shown in Table B-22, approximately 53 percent of total households have one or more housing problems. The majority of households with housing problems are renter - occupied, with 16,360 total renter-occupied households experiencing one or more housing problems ( 60 percent of all households with one or more housing problems). Note that these data are from the 2012 -2016 ACS dataset that may partially reflect the effects of the Great Recession.
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-17
Table B-22 Oxnard Housing Problems for All Households CHAS Data Book, 2016
Owner-Occupied
Households
Renter-Occupied
Households Total
Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage
Household has at least one of four
Housing Problems 10,830 40% 16,360 69% 27,190 53%
Household has none of four
Housing Problems 16,230 60% 7,080 30% 23,310 46%
Household Housing Problems data
not available 125 <1% 210 1% 335 1%
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 27,185 100% 23,655 100% 50,840 100%
Source: CHAS/ACS 2012 to 2016
Note: The four housing problems are: (1) incomplete kitchen facilities, (2) incomplete plumbing facilities, (3) more than one person per room, and (4) cost burden greater than 30% or 50%.
B.6 Housing Stock Characteristics
INVENTORY AND SUPPLY
According to the 2020 California DOF data, Oxnard added 3,468 housing units to its housing stock between 2010 and 2020, resulting in a housing growth rate greater than the overall Ventura County rate and higher than most of the other cities in the county (see Tables B-23 and B-24). Between 2010 and 2020, the Oxnard housing stock grew by seven percent (see Table B-23). Multifamily homes comprising five units or more (apartments or condominiums) increased at a high rate of 25 percent. Oxnard also saw an increase in the stock of duplexes and smaller multifamily complexes. According to the 2020 DOF data, Oxnard’s housing stock consists of 65 percent single -family and 31 percent multifamily homes. Mobile homes and other housing types (boats, vans, campers, etc.) are five percent of the housing stock (see Table B-24).
Table B-23 Housing Growth Trends, 2010 and 2020
Housing Units
Percentage Change
2010 2020
Camarillo 25,702 27,789 8%
Fillmore 4,408 4,664 6%
Moorpark 10,738 11,415 6%
Ojai 3,382 3,481 3%
Oxnard 52,772 56,240 7%
Port Hueneme 8,131 8,284 2%
San Buenaventura 42,827 43,784 2%
Santa Paula 8,749 9,050 3%
Simi Valley 42,506 43,469 2%
Thousand Oaks 47,497 48,159 1%
Unincorporated 34,983 34,875 0%
VENTURA COUNTY TOTAL 281,695 291,210 3%
Source: 2010 Census; 2020 CA DOF E-5 estimates
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-18 October 2022
Table B-24 Oxnard Housing Units by Type, Oxnard, 2010 and 2020 Unit Type
2010 2020 Change
Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage
Single-Family Detached 30,226 57% 30,743 55% 517 2%
Single-Family Attached 5,632 11% 5,802 10% 170 3%
2–4 Units 3,670 7% 3,842 7% 172 5%
5+ Units 10,629 20% 13,238 24% 2,609 25%
Mobile Home & Other 2,615 5% 2,615 5% 0 0%
TOTAL 52,772 100% 56,240 100% 3,468 7%
Source: 2010 and 2020 CA DOF E-5 Estimates
CONDITION AND AGE
Three measures useful in evaluating housing quality are the age of the structure, the incidence of overcrowding, and the lack of plumbing facilities. The ACS included data on both overcrowding and the lack of plumbing facilities and identified the number of structures built in each decade for each jurisdiction. As of 2020, the largest proportion of buildings in Oxnard were constructed between 1960 and 1969 at 23 percent, with buildings constructed between 1970 and 1979 following closely behind at just over 20 percent (see Table B-25).
Table B-25 Oxnard Year Housing Structure Built
Jurisdiction Before
1939
1940–
1949
1950–
1959
1960–
1969
1970–
1979
1980–
1989
1990–
1999
2000–
2010
2010 &
Later Total
Oxnard 1,400 2,666 8,223 13,137 11,065 6,159 4,780 4,932 3,977 56,339 % of Total 2% 5% 15% 23% 20% 11% 8% 9% 7% 100%
Source: 2011 ACS and 2017, 2018 and 2019 City of Oxnard Housing Element Annual Reports, Most legally-permitted units in Oxnard have full plumbing and kitchen facilities, based on observations by the City’s building inspectors and Code Compliance staff.
There are a handful of older, small residences that were built before 1940 without what is now considered complete kitchen and bathroom facilities. There are also an unknown number of unpermitted garage and internal subdivided homes that do not have complete kitchen and/or bathroom facilities, and some lack safe heating.
Residents of these units probably have access to kitchens and bathrooms in the “parent” housing unit or share with other boarders. Code Compliance responds to complaints of illegal units and initiates cases to bring the units into permit compliance if possible or requires the units to be removed. The City relies on anecdotal information from inspector, Police and Fire department field personnel, and Code Compliance cases to provide statistics on the condition of the housing stock. From 2015 through 2022, Code Compliance has opened a total of 518 substandard housing cases, investigated a total of 2,168 substandard Housing cases and resolved/closed 529 substandard housing cases . With the recent allowance of Accessory Dwelling Units ( ADUs) and J unior ADUs, many of the unpermitted conditions that previously were not allowed will now be allowed with proper permits. This has resulted in an extended time to resolve cases as the B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-19
corrections are not considered resolved until the entire permitting process for the units is completed. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the number of substandard c ases reported. T hey are significantly lower since the pandemic began. As summarized in Table B -25, approximately 45 percent of the housing units in the City were constructed prior to 1970 and may be in need of some type of rehabilitation or replacement. Although age does not always correlate with substandard housing conditions, neighborhoods with a concentration of homes 50 years old (or more) are more likely than newer neighborhoods to experience housing problems stemming from deferred maintenance, inadequate landscaping, and outdated utilities and therefore approximately 11,440 units could be in need of rehabilitation. However, this does not consider ongoing property owner reinvestment and most likely the rehabilitation need is much lower. To ensure the City has an accurate understanding of the neighborhoods in need of rehabilitation, the City has included in Program 1 a commitment to complete a windshield housing condition survey in targeted older and lower income neighborhoods which will help to inform the City on where rehabilitation efforts should be focused.
An even stronger predictor of housing condition may be the concentration of overcrowding in a neighborhood. Overcrowding typically occurs when individuals (i.e., students, seniors, and other low-wage households) share dwelling units to offset high housing costs. Neighborhoods with multiple families living in one household are more likely to need rehabilitation. The City's Code Compliance Division 'Safe Homes Safe Families' Program has not identified any units in need of substantial rehabilitat ion. Code Compliance inspectors meet regularly with Community Development building inspector field staff and the City Attorney’s Office to coordinate and prioritize the Code Compliance workload. The majority of cases referred involved home improvements com pleted without permits (replacement windows, water heaters, etc.) or substandard housing, including conversion of garages or internal subdivisions to create illegal living quarters that violate Building, Housing, Health and Safety, and Zoning Codes.
The Code Compliance Division posts the Landlord and Tenant Rights information on the City's website in Spanish and English, and provides contact information for renters to contact Code Compliance for complaints. Code Compliance reacts to complaints within 48 hou rs. They also react to complaints regarding specific properties from third party agencies such as the Housing Resource Center and the Ventura County 211 system. For health and safety issues (such as no hot water, dangerous conditions, etc.), the owner is required to pay for relocating the tenant.
If the owner does not relocate tenant, the City does have limited access to funds for relocation. The Code Compliance Division also has a program called Safe Homes Safe Families Repeat Offender Program to address i ssues with repeat offender landlords.
OCCUPANCY/TENURE
Housing tenure refers to whether the housing unit is rented, owned, or vacant.
Tenure is an important indicator of well-being in a community because it reflects the relative cost of housing opportunities and the ability of residents to afford housing.
Vacancies are also important housing market indicator s in that the vacancy rate Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-20 October 2022
influences the cost of housing and reflects the match between the demand for and availability of housing.
The homeownership rate among Oxnard residents was 55 percent in 2000, slightly less than Ventura County as a whole. This difference was partially due to varying differences in household income and the type of housing available in jurisdictions throughout Ventura County. Since 2010, vacancy rates in the city increased more than in the county, with a 24-percent increase in the city and a 10-percent increase in the county from 2010 to 2018 (see Table B-26). Overall, approximately 7 percent of housing units in Oxnard were vacant in 2018, or 3,688 households. In comparison, approximately 6 percent of housing units in Ventura County were vacant in 2018, or 16,272 units.
Table B-26 Vacancy Status in Oxnard and Ventura County, 2010 and 2018
Oxnard Ventura County
2010 2018 2010 2018
TOTAL HOUSING UNITS 52,772 55,148 281,695 287,498
Occupied (Households) 49,797 51,460 266,920 271,226
Percentage occupied 94% 93% 95% 94%
Percentage change in percentage occupied 3% 2%
Vacant 2,975 3,688 14,775 16,272
Percentage vacant 5% 7% 5% 6%
Percentage change in percentage vacant 24% 10%
For rent 847 777 4,664 3,480
Rented or sold, not occupied 55 186 324 561
For sale only 524 461 2,467 1,797
For seasonal, recreational, or occasional use 1,073 149 3,545 798 For migrant workers n/a 1206 N/A 5490
Other vacant 383 0 3,183 203
Source: 2010 Census; 2014-2018 American Community Survey - B25002, B25004 Rental Units
Table B-27 provides a survey of rental costs in Oxnard in July 2019 . Overall, average rental prices ranged from $ 975 for a one -bedroom unit to $3,204 for a three-bedroom unit.
Table B-27 Oxnard Survey of Rental Costs, July 2019
Studio 1-Bedroom 2-Bedroom 3-Bedroom
Average $1,502.00 $1,621.00 $2,028.00 $2,652.00
Low $1,175.00 $975.00 $1,225.00 $2,125.00
High $2,108.00 $2,320.00 $2,999.00 $3,204.00
Median $1,641.50 $1,647.50 $2,112.00 $2,664.50
Source: Dyer Sheehan Group, July 2019 Ventura County Apartment Market Survey B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-21
Home Prices
According to Trulia.com, most homes sold in Oxnard in November and December 2020 were three and four bedrooms. Average prices of homes sold in November and December 2020 by number of bedrooms are provided in Table B-28. The average price of a two-bedroom home was $557,769, three-bedroom was $671,825, and $774,092 for four bedrooms.
Table B-28 Prices of Homes Sold for Oxnard, November–December 2020 Studio 1-
Bedroom
2-
Bedroom
3-
Bedroom
4-
Bedroom
5-
Bedroom
6-
Bedroom
Average of Homes Sold $855,667 $299,950 $557,769 $671,825 $774,092 $1,010,500 $700,000 Data collected by SCAG for Oxnard and the SCAG region from 2000 through 2018 is displayed in the graph below (Figure B-1). Between 2000 and 2018, median home sales prices in Oxnard increased 133 percent, while prices in the SCAG region increased 151 percent. Median home sales prices in Oxnard in 2018 were $481,750 and the highest experienced since 2000 was $593,000 in 2006. Prices in Oxnard have ranged from a low of 78.9 percent of the SCAG region median in 2008 and a high of 111.9 percent in 2005.
Figure B-1. Median Home Sales Price for Existing Homes
SCAG Local Profiles, Core Logic/Data Quick. SCAG median home sales price calculated as household-weighted average of county medians.
B.7 Assisted Housing Developments at Risk of Conversion Government-assisted housing is often one of the largest resources for affordable housing in communities. Government assistance for housing can come in many forms, from laws, grants, loans, and other sources. The purpose of this section is to profile government-assisted housing in Oxnard (see Table B-29).
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-22 October 2022
Table B-29 Oxnard Inventory of Assisted Housing
Project Name Address No. and Type
of Units Type of Subsidy
Non-
Elderly
Afford-
able
units
Elderly
Afford-
able
units
Current
Owner
Earliest
Date of
Expiration
Options
for
Renewal
At
Risk
Colonia Village 1201–1363 Felicia Court, etc. 316 Family HUD 316 0 OHA N/A N/A N/A Pleasant Valley
Village 5101–5275 Squires Drive 100 Family HUD 100 0 OHA N/A N/A N/A Plaza Vista 401 South C Street 50 Senior HUD 0 50 OHA N/A N/A N/A Palm Vista 801 South C Street 100 Senior HUD 0 100 OHA N/A N/A N/A Althea Court 1341–1387 Althea Court 20 Family HUD 20 0 OHA N/A N/A N/A Concord Drive 2940–3026 Concord Drive 20 Family HUD 20 0 OHA N/A N/A N/A Cuesta del Mar 640–666 Cuesta del Mar 12 Family HUD 12 0 OHA N/A N/A N/A Fashion Park Place 230–257 Fashion Park Place 24 Family HUD 24 0 OHA N/A N/A N/A Fremont Way 1330–1356 Fremont Way 12 Family HUD 12 0 OHA N/A N/A N/A Hill Street 215–237 Hill Street 12 Family HUD 12 0 OHA N/A N/A N/A Terraza de Las
Cortes 201–255 Carmelita Ct. 63 Family +
1 MGR
LIHTC; Mortgage
Revenue Bond;
City Loans: In-
Lieu Fees &
Housing Trust
Fund
63 0 Terraza de las
Cortes, LP 2067 N/A N/A
Villas de Paseo
Nuevo 5451–5497 Cypress Rd. 71 Family +
1 Mgr unit
LIHTC & Mortgage
Revenue Bond;
CDC Loan
71 0 Paseo Nuevo
Partners, LP 2067 N/A N/A
Paseo El Prado
Apts. 110 W. Collins Street 23 of 112
Family
Mortgage
Revenue Bond 23 0 Strathmore 2026 — Yes
Holiday Manor Apts. 1924 Camino del Sol 250 Family
HUD Conversion,
Bond Issue, Tax
Credits
250 0 Steadfast 2073 N/A N/A
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-23
Project Name Address No. and Type
of Units Type of Subsidy
Non-
Elderly
Afford-
able
units
Elderly
Afford-
able
units
Current
Owner
Earliest
Date of
Expiration
Options
for
Renewal
At
Risk
Camino del Sol 1910 Camino del Sol 118 Senior Bonds, Tax Credits 0 118
Camino del
Sol Senior
Apt., LP
2059 N/A N/A
Channel Island Park
Apts. 931 Bismark Way 150 Family HUD Conversion 150 0 Steadfast 2072 N/A N/A Vineyard Gardens 161 Stroube Street 61 Family Tax Credit Project 61 0 High Ridge
Costa
Investors
2071 N/A N/A
Villa Solimar 910 Donlon Avenue 31 Family
Tax Credit project
with assistance
from CDC
31 0
Cabrillo
Economic
Develop.
Corp. (CEDC)
& HOME
CHDO loan
with
Affordable
Housing &
Rehabilitation
2068 N/A N/A
Meta Street Apts. 501 Meta Street 23 Farm-
worker
USDA/ Rural
Development;
RCAC, Joe Serna
Jr./RCAC; City of
Oxnard, HOME
23 0 CEDC 2058 N/A N/A
Villa Cesar Chavez 5559 Salvador Drive 52 Farm-
worker HOME; USDA-RD 52 0 CEDC 2061 N/A N/A
Villa Victoria 2140 N. Victoria Avenue
27 Farm-
worker
26 Low-
Income
California Housing
Finance Agency;
USDA RD;
California HCD
Joe Serna
Farmworker;
HOME; City of
Oxnard In-Lieu
Housing Fees
53 0 CEDC 2061 N/A N/A
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-24 October 2022
Project Name Address No. and Type
of Units Type of Subsidy
Non-
Elderly
Afford-
able
units
Elderly
Afford-
able
units
Current
Owner
Earliest
Date of
Expiration
Options
for
Renewal
At
Risk
Camino Gonzalez 481 W. Gonzales Road 17
USDA-RD §514; City
of Oxnard – CDC;
HOME; Deferred
Interest;
17 0 CEDC 2066 N/A N/A
Paseo De Luz 457 W. Gonzales Road 24 Disabled
HUD 811;
SHMHP; MHSA,
AHP
24 0 CEDC 2067 N/A N/A
Paseo Del Rio 281 River Park Blvd. 85
City of Oxnard,
California HCD
Multi-family
Housing; Federal
Home Loan Bank
Affordable
Housing; Ventura
county Behavioral
Health.
85 0 CEDC 2063 N/A N/A
Paseo Santa Clara 289 River Park Blvd. 53 Disabled
City of Oxnard,
California HCD
Multi-family
Housing; Federal
Home Loan Bank
Affordable
Housing; Ventura
county Behavioral
Health.
53 0 CEDC 2063 N/A N/A
Cypress Court
490 E. Pleasant Valley Rd;
5135, 5153, 5155 Cypress
Road
4 Disabled
HOME;
Resyndicated Tax
Credit w/ Villa
Solimar
4 0
CEDC;
Solimar
Associates
LLP
2068 N/A N/A
Wagon Wheel
Family Apts. 510 Winchester Drive 119 Family
Tax Exempt
Bonds, Tax Credit
Equity;
$14,267,022
provided by the
City of Oxnard
119 0 CEDC 2068 N/A N/A
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-25
Project Name Address No. and Type
of Units Type of Subsidy
Non-
Elderly
Afford-
able
units
Elderly
Afford-
able
units
Current
Owner
Earliest
Date of
Expiration
Options
for
Renewal
At
Risk
through the former
CDC
Sycamore Senior
Village 333 North F Street 226 Senior Tax Credit Project 226 0 American Housing Corp. 2063 N/A N/A
Colonial House
Apartments 705, North Oxnard Blvd Farmworker USDA-RD; Tax Credit 43 0
The Pacific
Companies;
Pacific West
Communities
2068 N/A N/A
Palm Terrace 711 South C Street 21 Family Bond Issue, Tax Credits 0 21 Seventh at C
Assoc. 2052 N/A N/A
Gateway Plaza 1719 S. Oxnard Boulevard 102 studios
Affordable
Bond Issue, Tax
Credits 102 0
1625 Gate-
way Limited
Partnership
2052 N/A N/A
Casa Merced 840 W. Fifth Street 40 Senior HUD Section 202 0 40 Mercy Charities 2038 N/A N/A
Casa San Juan 500 Hobson Way 63 Family Bond Issues, Tax Credits 63 0 Mercy
Charities 2051 N/A N/A
Villa Madera 1051 North A Street 71 Affordable Bond Issues, Tax Credits 71 0 Mercy
Charities 2059 N/A N/A
D Street Apartments 110 North D Street
7 Permanent
Supportive
Housing
CalHFA 7 0 Many
Mansions 2066 N/A N/A
Sonata at Riverpark 2901 Riverpark Blvd. 52 Family Tax Credits 52 0 Retirement
Housing
Foundation
2068 N/A N/A
Pacific Point
Apartments 1001 W. Gonzales Rd. 213 Tax Credits 213 0 — 2027 — Yes Heritage Park
Apartments 820 South E St. 195 Senior Tax Credits 0 195 iAsset Mgmt 2027 — Yes Gateway Station 1250 South Oxnard Blvd. 237 Tax Credits 237 0 The Pacific Companies 2070 N/A N/A
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-26 October 2022
Project Name Address No. and Type
of Units Type of Subsidy
Non-
Elderly
Afford-
able
units
Elderly
Afford-
able
units
Current
Owner
Earliest
Date of
Expiration
Options
for
Renewal
At
Risk
Sea Breeze
Apartments 3610 Samuel Ave. 91 Tax Credits 91 0 Sea Breeze Venture LP 2070 N/A N/A
Ormond Beach
Villas 5527 S. Saviers Rd. 39 Veterans
HOME, CDBG,
VHHP, HUD, Tax
Credits
39 0 Many
Mansions 2071 N/A N/A
Las Cortes 100 Amelia Ct. 142 HUD, Tax Credits 142 0 UHC Communities 2069 N/A N/A
Source: California Housing Partnership Corporation and City of Oxnard, 2021 B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-27
At-Risk Housing
For the purpose of Housing Element law, assisted housing developments or at-risk units are defined as multifamily rental housing complexes that receive government assistance under any of the following: federal, state, and/or local programs (or any combination of rental assistance, mortgage insurance, interest reductions, and/or direct loan programs) and which are eligible to convert to market r ate due to termination (opt-out) of a rent subsidy contract (e.g., Housing Choice Vouchers [Section 8]), mortgage prepayment (e.g., Federal Housing Administration), or other expiring use restrictions (e.g., s tate or local programs) within 10 years of the beginning of this Housing Element’s planning period or October 15, 2031. Loss of affordable and assisted housing can have a large impact on families with incomes below the average. The following is a list of assisted housing programs whose loss could reduce the number of affordable housing units.
Based on information from the California Housing Partnership Corporation (CHPC) and City of Oxnard, approximately 431 units in three projects are identified as potentially at risk, as defined above, during the period identified. Table B-30 presents these three potentially at-risk projects in Oxnard.
Table B-30 Oxnard Assisted Housing at Risk of Conversion to Market Rate Property Address Affordable Units Expiration
Year
Paseo El Prado Apts. 110 W. Collins Street 23 2026
Pacific Point Apartments 1001 W. Gonzales Road 213 2027 Heritage Park Apartments 820 South E Street 195 2027
TOTAL 431
Source: CHPC (SCAG Housing Element Data Packet)
Two of the projects above are tax credit projects. This type of projects typically extends their affordability covenants, but the City does not know at this time whether that is the owners’ plan.
Preservation Options
Transfer of Ownership
Aside from offering the current owner of an at- risk rental housing project modest financial incentives to maintain the property’s affordability status, a transfer of ownership of an at -risk project to a nonprofit housing provider is generally one of the least costly ways to ensure that the at -risk units remain affordable. By transferring property ownership to a nonprofit organization, low-income restrictions can be secured indefinitely, and the project becomes eligible for a greater range of governmental assistance.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-28 October 2022
Purchase of Affordability Covenant
Another option to preserve the affordability of at -risk projects is to provide an incentive package to owners to maintain the projects as low -income housing.
Incentives could include writing down the interest rate on the remaining loan balance in the form of a payment to the project lender and/or supplementing the HAP fair market rent to market levels, if mark et rents are substantially more than the HUD-allowed fair market rent. It is difficult to estimate the cost of purchasing affordability covenants due to the number of variables in such a purchase.
Rental Subsidy
Another way to preserve units as affordable is to provide rental assistance to existing residents. Rental assistance to the projects could be structured in a similar fashion to Section 8. The feasibility of this alternative is highly dependent on the availability of funding sources necessary to provide the rental subsidies and the willingness of the owners to accept the subsidies if they are provided.
Table B-31 shows the rental subsidies required to preserve at -risk units. The calculations assume that extremely low- and very low-income households would be the likeliest recipients of rental subsidies. The total cost for rental subsidies would range from $ 599 to $ 1,933 per unit per month, which equates to $3,099,321 annually.
Table B-31 Potential Rent Subsidies
Per Unit Affordable Rent + Utilities 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom Extremely Low-Income Monthly Rent (30%
AMI) (A) $678 $763 $915 $983
Very Low-Income (50% MFI) (B) $1,130 $1,271 $1,525 $1,638 Per Unit Fair Market Rent (C) $1,503 $1,943 $2,709 $3,243 Monthly Per Unit Subsidy (D=C-[Average
of A and B]) $599 $926 $1,489 $1,933
Annual Subsidy/Unit (D * 12) $7,191 $11,114 $17,868 $23,196 Total “At Risk” Units 431
TOTAL ANNUAL SUBSIDY $3,099,321
Source: HCD 2020; HUD Fair Market Rent Documentation System, 2020.
Note: The 1-bedroom unit assumes a 2-person household, the 2 -bedroom unit assumes a 3-person household, the 3-bedroom unit assumes a 5-person household, and the 4 bedroom unit assumes a 6-person household. All households are assumed to pay 30 percent of household income on rent and utilities.
Construction of Replacement Units
Constructing new low-income housing units is another means of replacing at -risk units that convert to market rate. The cost of developing the new housing depends upon a variety of factors, including density, unit size, location, land costs, and type of construction. Construction costs for recent multifamily developments averaged $200 per square foot, with an average unit costing $593,835. Based on this average, construction of replacement units would cost approximately $255,942,885, assuming an average unit size of 1,475 square feet and accounting B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-29
for land cost, government fees, and other costs. The cost of constructing replacement units far exceeds the cost of the other two alternatives.
Cost Comparisons
Based on the calculations, providing rental subsidies offers the least costly alternative for preserving the units while construction of new units is the most costly.
Both the construction of new units and the transfer of ownership to a nonprofit entity ensure long-term affordability of the units. Though rental subsidies are the least costly alternative, the subsidies do not necessarily ensure the long-term affordability of the units.
The cost estimating scenarios find the relative preservation costs to be:
Rent subsidy – $3,099,321 annually or $30,993,210 over 10 years. Replacement through new construction – $255,942,885.
Replacing or preserving the 431 at-risk units is costly, regardless of the method.
Providing a rent subsidy program appears to be the least costly option. However, many federal and state funding programs are available for new construction of affordable housing, which may greatly reduce the cost to the City.
B.8 Fair Housing Assessment
Assembly Bill (AB) 686 requires that all Housing Elements due on or after January 1, 2021, must contain an Asses sment of Fair Housing (AFH) consistent with the core elements of the analysis required by the federal Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Final Rule of July 16, 2015.
Under state law, affirmatively furthering fair housing means “taking meaningful actions, in addition to combatting discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics.”
There are three parts to this requirement:
1. Include a Program that Affirmatively Furthers Fair Housing and Promotes Housing Opportunities throughout the Community for Protected Classes (applies to Housing Elements beginning January 1, 2019).
2. Conduct an Assessment of Fair Housing, which includes summary of fair housing issues; an analysis of available federal, state, and local data and local knowledge; and an assessment of the contributing factors for the fair housing issues.
3. Prepare the Housing Element Land Inventory and Identification of Sites through the Lens of Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-30 October 2022
To comply with AB 686, the City has completed the following outreach and analysis.
Some of the information is based on the Ventura County Regional Analysis of Impediments (AI) that was completed in mid-2020.
OUTREACH
As discussed in the Chapter F of the Housing Element, Achieving the RHNA Allocation, the City of Oxnard utilized a variety of outreach methods to reach all segments of the community. These included a virtual community workshop held on March 24, 2021 that offered Spanish translation to all participants in attendance.
Fair housing related comments were regarding the difference s between Oxnard’s AAHOP program and proposed default density and by -right programs, providing support to undocumented residents, and ensuring affordability and housing security. The City also held three additional public meetings in Spring 2021, including a Planning Commission hearing to review the Draft Housing Element on April 1 , 2021 and Community Services, Public Safety, Housing & Development Committee meetings on March 9, 2021 and April 13, 2021. At the Planning Commission meeting, fair housing related comments and suggestions included participating in a Farmworker Housing Study being conducted by the County of Ventura and advocating for Rent Stabilization and ‘Just Cause’ ordinances. The Community Services, Public Safety, Housing & Development reiterated the benefits of participating in the Farmworker Housing Study and the Ventura County Housing Trust Fund program.
In April 2021, the City solicited public input through a community survey focused on housing disparities and possible solutions. The primar y fair housing issues that residents identified were the shortage of affordable and workforce housing and proximity of affordable housing to resources and safe neighborhoods. Very low - income persons, farmworkers, and residents in need of workforce housing were identified as the principal groups in need of housing support. While the response to this community survey identified a need for additional housing and need for repairs, only 5 responses were received and may not represent the sentiments or issues of all Oxnard residents.
More comprehensive and possibly more representative input was received through the stakeholder survey conducted for the County’s Regional AI, which consisted of 40 questions on topics including the populations targeted for community s ervices, severity of current needs in the community, existing barriers to affordable housing, and thoughts on community development goals and prioritization. In the Ventura County Stakeholder Survey, “housing affordability,” “land costs,” and “waiting lists” were reported as the most common barriers to affordable housing access.
Additionally, more than 80 percent of respondents indicate that they believe affordable housing needs have increased over the last five years.
During the analysis of impediments process, a meeting was held specific to the needs of Oxnard residents. During this meeting, participants noted that the City has surpassed other jurisdictions in Ventura County in the quantity of affordable housing built, but it is still not enough to meet demand. Participants expressed that while the supply of multifamily units has increased, they are not affordable to lower -income households, and raised that the high median income in Ventura County inflates the B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-31
price at which “affordable” housing is marketed to a point where households with a lower median income cannot afford it. This shortage of affordable housing has resulted in middle-class families leaving the City, an increase in overcrowding to make ends meet, and an increase in overcrowding.
The City also contracts with the Housing Rights Center (HRC), a professional housing service organization, to investigate claims of unlawful discrimination and act on behalf of victims of discrimination. Additionally, the HRC provides free seminars on fair housing in Oxnard twice per year.
FAIR HOUSING ENFORCEMENT
The City enforces fair housing and complies with fair housing laws and regulation through a twofold process: review of City policies and code for compliance with State law and investigating fair housing complaints.
The City reviewed its zoning regulations as part of preparation of the 2020 Ventura County Regional AI to ensure compliance with fair housing law, and will continue to regularly examine land use policies, permitting practices, and building codes to comply with state and federal fair -housing laws. Periodic reviews of the zoning regulations and policies confirm that, as the city grows and changes, it continues to ensure and enforce that all persons have access to sound and affordable housing.
Regular reviews of policies and practices ensure that, as the city grows and changes, it continues to ensure and enforce that all persons have access to sound and affordable housing to the extent that such housing is available In addition to assessing fair housing issues related to development standards, fair housing issues can also include discriminatory behaviors by landlords and housing conditions. The City complies with fair housing law regarding complaints by referring fair housing cases to the Housing Rights Center (HRC), HUD’s Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO), the California Department of Equal Opportunity and Housing (DFEH). In order to ensure non-discrimination in housing, the City contracts with the HRC, a nonprofit professional fair housing service and civil rights organization dedicated to securing and promoting fair housing. The HRC can investigate claims of unlawful discrimination and act on behalf of individuals who have been the victims of discrimination. The services are available in English, Spanish, Cantonese, Mandarin, Korean, Armenian, and Russian. HRC is responsible for providing ongoing fair housing outreach and education services to Ventura County, including Oxnard. HRC hosts an annual fair housing conference for fair housing providers and advocates and organizes housing rights workshops for landowners, property managers, and community managers. The fair housing conference and workshops seek to make tenants and landowners aware of housing rights, covering topics such as federal and state housing laws, common forms of housing discrimination, protected characteristics, unlawful practices, and fair housing liability. HRC advertises the annual fair housing conference and workshops in Spanish as well as English, utilizing biling ual media outlets and social media platforms. HRC additionally provides fair housing information on their website (https://www.housingrightscenter.org/). Oxnard residents can also find information on rental housing options published on the HRC’s website on a monthly basis. Fair housing information is also disseminated through various social media platforms, Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-32 October 2022
as well as through flyers and leaflets. In addition, the City’s Fair Housing Officer, based in the Housing Department, provides services related to reasonable accommodation requests for public housing assistance recipients.
The City adopted a Just Cause Eviction ordinance (Ord. No. 3012) and a Rent Stabilization ordinance (Ord. No. 3013) on May 3, 2022 that are more protective than California Civil Code Section 1946.2. These two ordinances became effective June 4, 2022 and were codified into the OCC under Chapter 27 Articles I and II.
The Just Cause ordinance requires landlords to give tenants a reason for their eviction (Consistent with California AB 1482) and includes a requirement that the owner provide tenant relocation assistance for no-fault evictions equal to 2 months of the tenant’s rent or $5,000, whichever is greater. The Rent Stabilization Ordinance restricts annual rent adjustments to not more than 4%. Both ordinances make it illegal for owners or their repr esentatives to retaliate against tenants for lawfully and peaceably exercising their legal rights under the ordinances. The landlords are required to post notice of the existence of Chapter 27 in the following languages: English, Purepecha, Mixteco, Otomi, Tagalog, Zapoteco, Nahuatl, and Spanish.
The Housing Rights Center reported to the City in late 2020 and early 2021 that the majority of fair housing cases that they handle are disability discrimination cases (both physical and mental). Some of the compl aints/cases focused on a landlord not providing a reasonable accommodation but City staff have noted that the housing stock type is the primary barrier. A significant percentage -- perhaps the majority -- of Oxnard's rental housing stock is composed of buildings constructed prior to the enactment of the Fair Housing Amendments Act and its state counterparts, which incorporated accessibility modifications into some residential building design. There are simply not enough units that are accessible to individuals with physical disabilities, considering the proportion of households that need such access. Since the adoption of the previous Housing Element (end of 2017), 449 complaints were filed. Of those, 88 complaints were filed that alleged some sort of prohibited discrimination in housing, 64 of these related to those with disabilities.
The information about where the cases originated was only available at the city level and couldn’t be geographically assigned to census tracts or any other sub-level of the overall City.
No complaints were filed against the City, and the City is not aware of any that were filed against the County of Ventura. Six complaints were filed against the Oxnard Housing Authority (OHA). All the complaints involved requests for reasonab le accommodation for in- place tenants who were renting from the OHA. All were resolved by the OHA and the tenants (in two cases, with the tenants being represented by California Rural Legal Assistance).
As part of the Fair Housing Assistance Program (FHAP ), DFEH dual -files fair housing cases with HUD’s Region IX FHEO; HUD FHEO reported five fair housing discrimination cases filed with, and accepted by HUD, in the City of Oxnard from January 1, 2013, through March 19, 2021. Most of these cases alleged discrimination on more than one basis, resulting in two cases of alleged discrimination based on race, two based on disability, two based on familial status, one based on sex, and one alleged retaliation. Two cases were successfully settled, B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-33
two were dismissed after finding no cause, and one was settled by the Department of Justice. In addition to these five cases, FHEO received 46 inquiries. Of these, 11 were regarding possible discrimination based on disability, 2 based on retaliation, 2 based on sex, and 1 ba sed on race. The others did not report a basis for the inquiry. As with the information from the HRC, the information about where the HUD cases originated was only available at the city level and couldn’t be geographically assigned to census tracts or any other sub-level of the overall city.
Program 19 has been included in Chapter G to work with fair housing enforcement organizations and agencies to track issues and identify patterns in the city.
ANALYSIS OF PATTERNS, TRENDS, DISPARITIES IN ACCESS TO
OPPORTUNITY AND HOUSING NEED
California Government Code Section 65583 (10)(A)(ii) requires the City of Oxnard to analyze areas of segregation, racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, and disproportionate housing needs, including displacement risk. According to the 2021 HCD and the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) Opportunity Area Map (Figure B -2), more than half of the City of Oxnard is considered low resource areas and there are two census tracts that are considered areas of high segregation and poverty. The northern and western reaches of the city have been designated as moderate resource. Some of the indicators identified by TCAC and HCD to determine the access to opportunity (resource area) include high levels of employment and close proximity to jobs, access to effective educational opportunities for both children and adults, low concentration of poverty, and low levels of environmental pollutants, among others.
These indicator scores decrease as the level of designation decreases until “Low Resource” areas, which typically have limited access to education and employment opportunities and may have poor environmental quality. Areas of high segregation and poverty are those that have an overrepresentation of people of color compared to the county, and at least 30 percent of the population in these areas is below the federal poverty line ($26,200 annually for a family of four in 2020). The City has conducted the following analysis of available dat a to assess local access to opportunities and indicators of fair housing issues. The different categories of areas in terms of resources as defined by TCAC are shown below. Not all of the types of areas currently exist in Oxnard. The current map and types of areas identified represent a static moment in time and will change over time.
High Segregation & Poverty. Areas in which at least 30 percent of the population earns an income below the federal poverty line and there is an overrepresentation of people of color relative to the county.
High Resource. Top 40 percent highest -scoring census tracts in the region.
Indicates residents in these census tracts have access to highly positive outcomes in terms of health, economic attainment, and education attainment.
Highest Resource. Top 20 percent highest -scoring census tracts in the region.
Indicates residents in these census tracts have access to the best outcomes in terms of health, economic attainment, and education attainment.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-34 October 2022
Low Resource. Bottom 30 percent of remaining census tracts in the region.
Indicates residents in these census tracts could be experiencing a lack of access to positive environmental, economic, and education factors results in negative outcomes or perpetuated outcomes (such as perpetuated poverty).
Moderate Resource. Top 30 percent o f remaining census tracts in the region.
Indicates residents in these census tracts have access to either somewhat positive outcomes in terms of health, economic attainment, and education; or positive outcomes in a certain area (e.g., score high for health, education) but not all areas (e.g., may score poorly for economic attainment).
Moderate Resource (Rapidly Changing). A filter applied to moderate resource tracts based on index scores just below the high resource threshold and experiencing rapid increas es in key dimensions of opportunity (housing price, median income, job proximity, etc.).
PATTERNS OF SEGREGATION
To assess patterns of segregation and integration, the City analyzed six characteristics: income, disability, familial status, diversity index, linguistic isolation, and Hispanic majority as of 2019 (2018 for Diversity Index). This information is displayed in Figures B-3 through B-8.
Race and Ethnicity
Oxnard has three census tracts that are considered a Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Area of Poverty (R/ECAP), or areas in which more than 50 percent of the population identifies as non-white and there is a poverty rate of 40 percent or more or a poverty rate of more than three times the average poverty rate for the county (see Figure B-12). One R/ECAP in Oxnard is the Southwinds Neighborhood, bounded by W. Pleasant Valley Road to the north, Saviers Road to the east, W Hueneme Road to the south, and S J Street to the west. The other two are adjacent to one another, Five Points Northeast Neighborhood and La Colonia. The two combined are bounded by Colonia Road to the north, S. Rose Avenue to the east, and Oxnard Boulevard to the west and south, with La Colonia in the northwest corner of the combined area. Historically, La Colonia was a dense and high ly segregated neighborhood with racial covenants in place in the 1920s that barred minorities from purchasing and owning homes in this neighborhood, thus creating a neighborhood with low ownership rates and few opportunities for economic mobility. Similar patterns of segregation likely existed in the Northeast Southwinds neighborhoods, though trends are not as readily available.
As of the 2015 –2019 ACS, the population of Oxnard’s R/ECAP tracts were estimated to be 4,870 people in the Five Points Northeast tract, 4,230 people in the La Colonia tract, and 7,788 people in the Southwinds tract. Over 25 percent of the households in the Five Point Northeast Neighborhood use Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV), for a total of 196 HCVs in use within this tract. While the Five Point Northeast Neighborhood does not have the highest percentage of HCVs in use compared to other census tracts in the City, the concentration in a R/ECAP designated census tract suggests low-income housing is concentrated in this area and indicates a lack of mobility to medium and high resource areas in the City.
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-35
There is a Hispanic majority in all three of the R/ECAP areas as well as high levels of linguistic isolation, similar to the east side of the city (See Figure B-6). Inside the areas of linguistic isolation (60 % or higher) within the City only the center of the City has areas of residential development. The areas more to the north and south are solely developed with commercial and industrial uses. Similar patterns of linguistic isolation are recognized across coastal counties within the SCAG region.
The inland, urban areas of Los Angeles County and Orange County, where there is a predominant Hispanic population, also have the highest level of linguistic isolation.
Very few of the census tracts along the coast have a predominant Hispanic population and have the lowest levels linguistic isolation. All three R/ECAP neighborhoods are also identified as areas of High Segregation and Poverty on the TCAC maps. In addition to the R/ECAP areas, there ar e areas of the city, shown on the maps in this section, that generally have high levels of linguistic isolation, a Hispanic majority, lower incomes, lower levels of married couple families (familial status), and a higher -diversity index, indicating patterns of segregation based on several factors. Program 19 includes existing and proposed efforts the City will make to address the needs of those in R/ECAPs and areas of linguistic isolation.
In contrast to a R/ECAP, a racially concentrated area of affluence (RCAA) is defined as a census tract in which 80 percent or more of the population is White and has a median income greater than $125,000 annually. There are no census tracts in, or overlapping with, Oxnard that qualify as a RCAA. Most RCAAs in the SCAG region are located in coastal communities while inland suburban communities do not reflect this pattern.
Most of the eastern portion of the City had a diversity index greater than or equal to 70, with 100 being perfect diversity and 0 being no diversity. Almost all the city has a diversity index of 55 or higher. In 2010 the diversity index was similar to 2018 with the main difference that the areas closest to the coast are more diverse in 2018 than in 2010.
Income
The area with the highest median income is in the northern and western portions of the City of Oxnard. In the River Ridge neighborhood, the median income is $125,758, compared to $22,539 to $75,329 in La Colonia, Five Points Northeast and $40,208 to $46,957 in Five Points Northeast, and $29,934 to $38,793 in the Southwinds neighborhood. The River Ridge neighborhood consists primarily of newer, high-end single-family homes while the neighborhoods with lower median incomes range from mobile home parks to older, smaller single-family homes. While there are still distinct differences in median income in Oxnard, the City has experienced a citywide overall increase in median income since 2014 and a started to shift toward a more mixed -income, integrated community. Though Oxnard has higher rates of poverty than surrounding jurisdictions, with concentrations in the R/ECAPs, the median income in other areas of the city are similar to the surrounding region, particularly inland communities. Within the City, income distribution follows regional patterns for SCAG’s urban areas, with the highest median incomes found along the coastline and areas with the lowest median income located in the inland, urban core. However, within Ventura County, some inland cities such as Thousand Oaks, Simi Valley, and Moorpark are predominantly Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-36 October 2022
high income. The City will implement Program 19 to target place- based revitalization efforts in areas of concentrated poverty and Program 36 to encourage construction of high density housing and ADUs in areas with higher median income and greater access to opportunity to facilitate economic mobility for lower -income residents.
Familial Status
Familial status varies between census tracts more than the other indicators, and more than in other Ventura County jurisdictions. Other Ventura County cities, including Santa Paula, Simi Valley, Moorpark, and Thousand Oaks are dominated by married-couple households, with most census tracts within the cities showing up to 79 percent or up to 100 percent of children living in married-couple households.
Comparatively, Oxnard only contains two census tracts with between 80 to 100 percent of children living in married-couple households. In much of Oxnard, there is a higher incidence of children living in family arrangeme nts other than married- couple households, such as single-parent households or unmarried households. In this way, Oxnard reflects the inland urban areas in the SCAG region, such as within the Los Angeles County urban core, and other cities within Ventura County reflect suburban cities along the SCAG coastline. In the SCAG region, including within the Los Angeles urban core the percentage of children in single parent or unmarried families is typically concentrated within low resource and/or areas of high segregation and poverty. This differs from Oxnard, where s ingle-parent and unmarried family households are more dispersed within the City and not necessarily concentrated within low-resource areas or areas of high segregation and poverty.
The lack of concentration within low resource areas indicates non -traditional (i.e., non-married couples) families with children encounter less barriers to housing choice in Oxnard.
Persons with Disabilities
As discussed in the Needs Assessment section of the Housing Element , approximately 10 percent of Oxnard’s noninstitutionalized population in 2018 had at least one disability, and 40 percent of those individuals were seniors, who are more likely to have an ambulatory, visual, or hearing disability. The rate of individuals with a disability has remained low (less than 20 percent of the population) and not changed significantly since 2014. As shown in Figure B -5, persons with disabilities are not segregated within any areas of the City; for example, the Five Points East and La Colonia neighborhoods, designated as R/ECAPs, and the beachside neighborhoods designated as moderate resource each have a larger population (up to 20 percent) of persons with a disability .
Furthermore, two of the City’s three housing developments for persons with disabilities, Paseo de Luz and Paseo Santa Clara, are located in northeast Oxnard in an area designated as moderate resource. This implies that persons with disabilities may not experience barriers, such as access to essential services, that prevent housing choice within Oxnard. However, as will be discussed, of a total of 33 fair housing cases within Oxnard from 2013 to 2021, 25 percent alleged disability as the basis for fair housing cases within Oxnard. As Oxnard has a low population of persons with disabilities within the City, the number of cases alleging disability may indicate this population has difficulty securing housing in Oxnard, forcing B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-37
individuals to look elsewhere for suitable housing. Oxnard recognizes the need to expand housing o pportunities for persons with disabilities within the city. Oxnard will implement Program 21 and 22, committing to continue implementing the City’s reasonable accommodation ordinance to make existing housing suitable for persons with disabilities and to encourage the development of housing specific to special needs groups, including persons with disabilities. T he City’s population of individuals with a disability is reflective of Ventura County, which also has a lower rate of individuals with a disability than nearby counties. Regionally, areas with a higher population of persons with a disability are located in the eastern, rural areas of San Bernardino County and Imperial County. The median income in these areas is significantly lower than the urbanized coastal counties and is likely more affordable.
Other Relevant Factors
SCAG’s Healthy Parks, Schools and Communities reports that racially restrictive housing covenants were used throughout Ventura County until the late 1960s.
People of color were concentrated in segregated neighborhoods, including La Colonia in Oxnard which is currently a R/ECAP, and non- white farmers were not permitted to own the land they worked. The Central Coast Alliance Unified for a Sustainable Economy (CAUSE) in their report Housing Crisis 805 further explained the history of segregation in Oxnard as racial segregation persisted in the m id- 1900s when redlining barred people of color from obtaining mortgage loans and when racial segregation became illegal and “white flight” from Oxnard resulted in a decline in land values and economic practices that resulted in renewed segregation.
These practices and trends have resulted in the patterns of concentrated poverty and minority groups in areas of disinvestment in Oxnard. While redlining maps are not available for Oxnard, historic land use and economic policies instigated patterns of segregation that are still present in the city today, as indicated by the dominance of low-resource areas and presence of R/ECAPs.
To address issues of segregation and poverty the City has included Programs 2, 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 19, and 26, 29, 33 & 34 in Chapter G to:
Reduce displacement risk and promote place-based revitalization through homeowner rehabilitation loans.
Increasing housing mobility opportunities and/or housing in high resource areas.
A ssist the farming community and housing developers in obtaining loans and grants and processing applications for the rehabilitation and/or establishment of new farm labor housing.
Implement the City’s Inclusionary Housing Program to increase the supply of affordable housing to promote housing mobility and reduce displacement risk due to overcrowding and overpayment.
Improve housing mobility opportunities through homebuyer assistance for lower- and moderate-income households.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-38 October 2022
Support the County’s Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) program to assist lower-income households in securing housing.
Provide financial and regulatory incentives for development of affordable housing to reduce displacement due to overcrowding and overpayment. Annually seek funding to provide targeted rehabilitation efforts in low resource areas and prioritize place-based revitalization. Encourage construction of housing affordable to extremely low-, very low-, and low-income households in high opportunity areas.
ACCESS TO OPPORTUNITY
The TCAC/HCD Opportunity Area Map (Figure B -2) has designated much of the city as Low and Moderate Resource, implying that there is mixed and limited access to jobs and educational opportunities for residents.
Educational Opportunities
Schools are fairly well distributed throughout the City with no areas of dramatically less access or proximity to schools (See Figure B -9). According to the 2016 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) test scores, Oxnard’s highest performing school is ranked in the 70th percentile when compared to other similar schools across the state. This school is located on the western side of the city in one of the areas with the highest median income. Of Oxnard’s 46 schools, 26 scored in the 25th percentile when compared to other schools in the state, and 19 scored in the 10th percentile. One of the highest ranked schools serves the Southwinds neighborhood, which is designated as a R/ECAP and as an area of high segregation and poverty on the TCAC maps. However, this school is in the 40th percentile, indicating that 60 percent of similar schools in the state performed better than this school. One of the lowest ranked schools is located within the La Colonia neighborhood, which is designated as a R/ECAP. While low performing schools are not necessarily concentrated in any one part of the city, residents of Oxnard have limited access to proficient school opportunities due to the quality of the schools. To address this, the City will meet with developers to encourage construction of housing that will be affordable on a teacher’s salary and will partner with organization such as United Ways to address disparities in access to strong educational opportunities (Program 19).
Mobility Options
Oxnard residents are served by intercity bus routes, regional bus service, and Metrolink commuter rail service. Metrolink serves regional Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, and North San Diego Counties in Southern California. Metrolink Ventura County Line trains stop in San Buenaventura, Oxnard, Camarillo, Moorpark, and Simi Valley. As of 2021, Metrolink provides service to Los Angeles only in the early morning hours and has limited return trips on the afternoon. Gold Coast Transit is planning to expand service in Oxnard’s High Quality Transit Corridor along Oxnard Boulevard during the Housing Element planning period. Overall, Oxnard has relatively good public transit. Program 19 calls for an assessment of pedestrian and bicycle facilities in R/ECAPs and areas of B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-39
linguistic isolation to improve mobility options in underserved areas. Program 31 includes work to improve transit along the High Quality Transit Corridor.
In February 2011, the City adopted a Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Master Plan, which identified the existing bike and pedestrian infrastructure and the demand for routes, improvements, and/or safety features. As identified in the Plan, the City has existing Class II bike routes (separate bike lane) citywide, including within the City’s low resource areas in central Oxnard and areas designated as an R/ECAP. Within the R/ECAPs, Class II bike routes are provided along Gonzales Road, Camino Del Sol, and Rose Avenue providing either direct or proximate access to seven schools and several parks . The Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Master Plan includes proposed bike plan improvements and expansions, most significantly a multi -use path (not in the roadway) for bikes and pedestrians that runs north and south in central Oxnard along Oxnard Boulevard and connecting path (east/west) within the R/ECAP along Fifth Street. This will provide convenient and safe access to a major commercial corridor and is accessible to residents of low resource and R/ECAP areas. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Master Plan will be reviewed and incorporated as a part of the City’s Sus tainable Transportation Plan (STP) effort, which was initiated in 2022. Access, multi-modal transportation, and environmental amenities are significant goals of the Sustainable Transportation Plan. The City has added an action item to Program 19 in Chapter G regarding the completion of the City of Oxnard STP in Fiscal Year 2022-2023. The STP will address disparities in access to transportation opportunities by incorporating complete streets design, safe routes to school, vision zero, sidewalk and bike lane improvements and first/last mile planning in tandem with land use opportunities in lower resourced areas including R/ECAPs and areas of linguistic isolation. Following submission of the housing element to HCD in October 2021, the City received a $410,000 transportation grant from Caltrans toward completing the STP. In April 2022 the City Council awarded a professional services agreement with Fehr & Peers to develop the STP. Development of the STP will include idea generation and prioritization, establishment of the sustainable transportation framework, catalog of enhanced streetscape elements, conceptual design alternatives, identification of funding sources, implementation steps, and a final STP for adoption by the City Council.
A key initiative of the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Master Plan was to complete a cityw ide sidewalk survey to identify areas of increased pedestrian demand (based on proximity to schools, commercial areas/employment centers, and public transit, among other factors) and barriers to safely utilize pedestrian infrastructure in ar eas of high demand. The City completed the report of High Demand Pedestrian Areas in 2015, identifying 14 high demand pedestrian areas that each encompass about one to two blocks. Of the 14 pedestrian areas, 11 are located along Oxnard Boulevard/South Oxnard Boulevard/ Saviers Road corridor, and seven (or half) are concentrated along South Oxnard Boulevard between West Ninth Street to the south and Palm Drive to the north (referred to as Downtown Oxnard in the report). These areas fall within census tracts designated as low resource (west of South Oxnard Boulevard) and an area of High Segregation and Poverty (east of South Oxnard Boulevard) and would reasonably be utilized by residents in both census tracts. The High Demand Pedestrian Areas report identified that within a half mile radius of these areas there were approximately 20 instances of missing curb ramps and 40 instances of pedestrian collisions.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-40 October 2022
Compared to the City’s other high demand pedestrian areas, Downtown Oxnard has lower instances of missing curbs and ramps, which is more significant since it is the largest area survey ed. With the exception of Palm Drive, the high demand pedestrian areas in Downtown Oxnard also received relatively low scores comparatively for ADA Severity, an indicator for the number of barriers within each area for a person with disabilities to safely navigate as a pedestrian. However, the number of pedestrian collisions in Downtown Oxnard is higher than other areas of high pedestrian demand. The report includes the following suggested programs for the City to consider that would address pedestrian safety. Consider adopting a Vision Zero policy sets the goal of reducing traffic - related fatalities to zero by a certain year. The City would work to improve safety conditions for all road users, particularly vulnerable users like pedestrians and cyclists.
Consider adopting a Complete Streets policy to institutionalize practices associated with complete streets.
Install pedestrian -friendly traffic signals, such as leading pedestrian intervals that gives pedestrians an advance walk signal before motorists get a green signal, and pedestrian-oriented speed limits.
These efforts have been included in Program 19.
In addition to providing infrastructure for alternative transportation, the City further supports alternative forms of transportation in the Downtown by allowing centralized parking in an offsite lot for residential developments rather than requiring parking minimums onsite. This allows more efficient land use development by dedicating more space onsite to the land use, and in the case of multifamily housing, allows more units onsite. The City is committed to reviewing development standards and regulations on an annual basis to facilitate transit-oriented development Downtown (Program 19) and reviewing parking requirements citywide (Program 27).
Employment Opportunities
As discussed in the Demographic, Employment and Housing Characteristics in this chapter, a majority of Oxnard residents work in or near the city (see Table B- 12).
The commute time for approximately 71 percent of residents is less than 30 minutes, while approximately 30 percent of residents commute 30 minutes or more to work. Only 5 percent of Oxnard’s residents commute longer than 60 minutes to work. Currently, Oxnard’s housing to job balance indicates Oxnard is job-rich, with the available jobs (83,994) exceeding the available households (51,449) in the city.
The unemployment rate in Oxnard was 5.4 percent in 2019, down from 12.2 percent in 2010, according to the California Employment Development Department. Access to jobs in the City appears to meet demand.
Services for Persons with Disabilities
To meet the needs of the older population and other individuals with disabilities, there are ten assisted living facilities located throughout the City, three of which specifically provide units to persons with disabilities: Paseo De Luz (24 units), B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-41
Paseo Santa Clara (5 units) and Cypress Court (4 units). Additionally, Access Paratransit, a reservation based, curb-to-curb paratransit service, is also available for those with disabilities. The City requires new developments to comply with Title 24 of the California Building Code to ensure that all new construction meets accessible design standards, thus ensuring that all new housing is accessible for all residents regardless of disability. Additionally, the City ensures that older housing that may not meet the same accessibility requirements can be adapted as needed through their reasonable accommodation process (discussed in the Governmental Constraints section of this Housing Element in Chapter E) and assistance with rehabilitations (Programs 2 and 21).
Environmental Health
In February 2021, the California Office for Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (COEHHA) released the fourth version of CalEnviroScreen, a tool that uses environmental, health, and socioeconomic indicators to map and compare community’s environmental scores (see Figure B -10). A community with a high score, is one with higher levels of pollution and other negative environmental indicators. An area with a score in the 75th percentile or above is considered a “disadvantaged community.” The Rose Park, Five Points Northeast, East Village, and Cal-Giser neighborhoods score in the 75th percentile and above. The proximity of Rose Park and East Village to industrial uses east of Highway 1 may contribute to their score in the 90th percentile. According to the Ventura County Regional AI, Oxnard was one of the earliest areas to develop, following suburban development patterns that resulted in dense urban patterns with few parks and other recreational facilities in residential neighborhoods. Though there are publicly accessible beaches in Oxnard, the adjacent neighborhoods are primarily White with hi gh median incomes, resulting in disproportionate access to healthy outdoor recreational opportunities near homes. Disparities in access to opportunities for recreation and outdoor space by income presents a fair housing issue in the form of barriers to healthy environments based on income.
Environmental conditions in Oxnard and surrounding communities are higher than most coastal cities in the region and more closely reflect inland urban areas. This further demonstrates disproportionate access to opportunity for populations of color and lower-income households. In order to combat poor environmental conditions and improve access for residents in concentrated areas of poverty, the City will increase parkland requirements for new developments and ensure these are met through parks and not through passive landscaping and increasing tree canopy coverage where needed ( Program 19 ) and will prioritize investment in green infrastructure in areas of concentrated poverty (Program 19).
DISPROPORTIONATE HOUSING NEED AND DISPLACEMENT RISK
Overcrowding and Overpayment
As discussed in Chapter B, Existing Housing Needs, and Chapter C, Populations with Special Housing Needs, overcrowding is a significant issue for renters in the City of Oxnard, with 29 percent of renter households overcrowded with 1.01 or more persons per room (Table B-17). Overcrowding is more common in areas with lower median incomes than in areas with high median incomes. Overcrowding typically Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-42 October 2022
means that either appropriately sized housing is unaffordab le or unavailable to current residents, and results in an increased risk of displacement for households living in unit types that do not meet their needs. In order to address overcrowding as a result of doubling up, unaffordable housing options, multi -generational households, or other reasons, the City will continue promoting the construction of ADUs (Program 36), including target marketing of ADUs in the area of highest rate of overcrowding to encourage an increase in housing supply and reducing risk of displacement for residents of these neighborhoods.
Overpayment is also an issue in Oxnard, particularly among renters, with 31 percent of owners and 54 percent of renter households overpaying for housing as detailed earlier in this chapter. For distribution of overpayment for renters see Figure B-11.
According to CAUSE, the average rent price for a one-bedroom unit in Oxnard has increased by 50 percent since 2011. Overpayment increases the risk of displacing residents who are no longer able to afford their housing costs and often impacts other aspects of a household’s living experience by consuming money that could otherwise be used for clothes, food, or other basic necessities. As shown in Table B-26, the vacancy rate in Oxnard is 7 percent, which does not indicate an extreme shortage of supply; therefore, overpayment is likely due to a shortage of affordable housing. To address displacement risks due to overpayment, the City will provide incentive to encourage affordable development and will develop a targeted program to connect lower -income residents with affordable homeownership and rental opportunities within the city (Programs 11, 12, and 19 in Chapter G).
Housing Condition
In addition to extensive overpayment, approximately 80 percent of the housing stock in Oxnard is older than 30 years and is likely in need of some type of repair or rehabilitation. In some cases, the cost of repairs can be prohibitive, resulting in the owner or renter living in substandard housing conditions or being displaced if the house is designated as uninhabitable. Additionally, in many cases, renters have little to no control over repairs to the unit in which they live. In 2019, CAUSE reported that nearly 20 percent of habitability issues reported by residents were not fixed and 20 percent of issues were resolved by the tenant making the repair out of their own pocket. To prevent fair housing issues that stem from housing condition, the City will continue to assist homeowners and landlords to identify and apply for rehabilitation funding through Program 2 in Chapter G and will target place- based revitalization efforts in areas identified to have the greatest need for rehabilitation.
The City will also develop a code enforcement program to ensure that landlords of rental units are completing repairs for tenants in a timely manner without threat of retaliation (Program 19).
SITES INVENTORY
The City of Oxnard examined the opportunity area map prepared by HCD and TCAC (Figure B-2).
Using the statewide opportunity area map as an overlay to the City’s Housing Element sites inventory, the City was able to identify if any sites included in the sites inventory that are planned to accommodate lower -income households were in moderate- or low-opportunity areas or areas of high segregation and poverty areas.
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-43
The City’s candidate sites for lower -income, moderate -income, and above - moderate income housing units (Map S -1) are in a variety of TCAC resource categories. The location of candidate sites, particularly candidate sites for lower - income housing units work to integrate affordability in moderate-resource areas of the city and offer opportunities for place-based investment in low-resource areas of the city.
Integrating lower income housing within rapidly within Oxnard’s rapidly changing moderate resource areas increases access to opportunity-rich areas for low-income families. Within Oxnard, these are the areas of most opportunity since there are no high resource designations within the City and will correlate with access to positive economic, educational, and health outcomes and may transition to high resource in future years. The City has a proposed residential project within the rapidly changing moderate resource area that will result in 106 lower income units integrated with 252 moderate income units and 172 above -moderate income units. The City will increase opportunity to allow housing in the Business Research Park Zone through an affordable housing permitted overlay, which could result in an additional 112 unit within the rapidly changing moderate resource zone. Program 33 commits the city to establish an overlay district for the Business Research Park zone and include flexible development standards to encourage residential development, including, but not limited to, yard setbacks, garage parking, shared parking, and building space requirements.
Oxnard has identified a capacity for more than 250 lower income housing units and more than 250 moderate housing units within the City’s Downtown along Oxnard Boulevard. Oxnard Boulevard serve s as a major north- west transit route and is identified as a high -quality transit corridor in SCAG’s Connect SoCal 2020 -2045 Regional Transportation Plan Data/Map Book for the City of Oxnard. The Downtown area is designated as low resource on the TCAC Map and Oxnard Boulevard serves as the western boundary for the City’s R/ECAPs. Locating additional affordable housing within the Downtown area, particularly within the R/ECAPs, supports placed-based solutions to alleviating fair housing issues and disproporti onate housing need issues. As shown in Figure B-11, the Downtown area coincides with high rates of overpayment by renters. Expanding affordable housing options will decrease competition, and subsequently rising rental prices, for existing units.
Further, transit-oriented development aligns mobility needs with housing needs and has long-term benefits that counteract potential negative outcomes identified for residents of low resource areas and R/ECAPs. As a high -quality transit corridor, Oxnard Boulevard offers a fixed-route bus service with intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours. In 2019, the City adopted a form-based code for the Downtown (the Downtown Development Code) to “create main street mixed- use areas serving urban neighborhoods of pedestrian-oriented streets with a variety of housing types,” encouraging mixed-use development with convenient access to essential services, grocery stores, and employment opportunitie s. With the adoption of the Downtown Development Code, the City anticipates the development of 2,300 housing units in that area of the city. The City will conduct a utility capacity study to analyze the capacity and infrastructure upgrade needs for water/wastewater, stormwater, recycled water, refuse, and as needed a parking analysis/inventory to support new housing units downtown resulting from adoption of the Downtown Development code (Program 30). Two of the affordable housing Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-44 October 2022
projects currently underway to expand affordable housing in Downtown on City- owned sites are:
The Aspire Project, a.k.a. Central Terrace Apartments. This project proposes to develop 87 lower income units in the Five -Points Northeast neighborhood, which is designated as an R/ECAP. Project entitlements are anticipated for 2021, with development in 2022.
City Navigation Center. This project will provide 56 permanent supportive housing units in the same building as the lower barrier navigation center.
The City is contributing $1.5 million in non-general fund restricted cash plus the donation of real property ($1 million). Development is anticipated in 2022.
After the analysis, it has been concluded that sites to address the lower income RHNA allocation are distributed throughout differe nt areas of the City and throughout the different types of resource areas shown on the TCAC map (Figure B-2). The sites for lower income are slightly more concentrated in and around the Downtown. That area of the City is well resourced in terms of access to many services and transit so is suitable for providing additional access when housing is located there.
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS
Through an evaluation of the Regional AI, input from City staff, the HRC, and HUD; and this assessment of fair housing issues the City identified factors that contribute to fair housing issues in Oxnard, as shown in Table B-32.
Table B-32. Factors that Contribute to Fair Housing Issues AFH Identified Fair
Housing Issue Contributing Factor Meaningful Action
Presence of R/ECAPs.
Availability of rentals that accept
Housing Choice Vouchers
Linguistic Isolation of non-
English speaking households
Limited economic mobility
opportunities
Provide training to landlords on fair housing laws and
encourage them to market their rental units in high
resource to voucher holders (Program 18)
Distribute information regarding fair housing, tenant
rights, rehabilitation grants, rehabilitation loans, first- time homebuyer programs, and Section 8 programs
(Program 19)
Actively recruit residents from neighborhoods of
concentrated poverty to serve or participate on boards, committees, and other local government bodies
(Program 19)
Seek funding for targeted rehabilitation (Program 19)
Invest in basic infrastructure in low resource areas and areas of future development (Program 19)
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-45
AFH Identified Fair
Housing Issue Contributing Factor Meaningful Action
Concentration of low-
income households
Coastline neighborhoods are
more desirable, and therefore
more costly than urban core
Availability of rentals that accept
Housing Choice Vouchers
Availability of affordable units in
a range of sizes
Use land use, zoning, and development standards to
address barriers to housing choices in high-opportunity areas, such as ADUs and minimum lot sizes. (Program
19)
Facilitate lot consolidation for development of
affordable housing in high opportunity areas (Program
5)
Encourage landlords in high resource areas to market
their rental units to Section 8 voucher holders
(Program 18)
Encourage mixed-use and mixed-income development
in non-residential zones (Program 33)
Encourage construction of ADUs in high resource
areas (Program 36)
Displacement risk due
to overpayment by
renters
Availability of affordable units in
a range of sizes
Unaffordable rents and home
prices
Lack of partnerships with
affordable housing developers
Costs of repairs or rehabilitation
Provide rehabilitation assistance to homeowners
(Program 2)
Implement the Inclusionary Housing Program to
increase supply of affordable housing units (Program
10)
Provide down payment assistance to eligible potential
homeowners (Program 11)
Provide mortgage assistance to homeowners through
the Mortgage Credit Certificate program (Program 12)
Encourage development of housing for extremely low-
income households (Program 26)
Collaborate with developers to develop affordable
housing on City-owned sites (Program 29)
Encourage construction of ADUs to increase supply of
affordable housing (Program 34)
Disproportionate
access to
opportunities
Availability of high-ranked
schools throughout the City.
Shortage of public access to
recreational facilities and
parkland.
Encourage additional multifamily housing in high-
performing school areas (Program 19)
Work with school districts to attract and retain high-
quality teachers (Program 19)
Increase parkland requirements for new developments
(Program 19).
Prioritize green infrastructure investment in areas of
concentrated poverty (Program 19).
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-46 October 2022
Figure B-2. TCAC/HCD Opportunity Areas
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-47
Figure B-3. Median Income Distribution
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-48 October 2022
Figure B-4. Familial Status
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-49
Figure B-5. Population with Disability
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-50 October 2022
Figure B-6. Diversity Index
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-51
Figure B-7. Linguistic Isolation
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-52 October 2022
Figure B-8. Hispanic Majority
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-53
Figure B-9. Access to Schools
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-54 October 2022
Figure B-10. CalEnviroScreen 4.0
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-55
Figure B-11. Overpayment
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-56 October 2022
Figure B-12. Racially Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs)
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-57
B.9 Opportunities for Energy Conservation
The California Department of Community Services and Development, in partnership with the network of local community services agencies that assist low -income households, administers the Low -Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) that provides financial assistance to low-income households to offset the costs of heating and cooling dwellings. The department also manages the Energy Low-Income Weatherization Assistance Program (DOE -LIWAP) that provides insulation and weatherization measures that increase the energy efficiency of dwellings occupied by low-income persons.
The City of Oxnard through public education promote the LIHEAP program. The program provides energy assistan ce one time per year for income- eligible households with current gas or electric bills with the requirement that applicants attend an energy education workshop. Commun ity Action of Ventura County Inc. runs the local DOE-LIWAP and provides services, including minor home repair and infiltration measures to provide an energy-efficient, safe, and hazard-free dwelling environment, improving the quality of life for income-qualified households. Some of the measures (or services) that Community Action of Ventura County Inc. installs are as follows:
Install w eather stripping for all exterior doors, install new thresholds, readjust doors for proper fit, and in some cases replace doors and lock sets. These items alone could save 5 to 25 percent on heating and cooling costs.
Low-flow showerheads and aerators can save up to 5 percent on water heating cost. Electrical outlet and switch gaskets can save up to 3 percent on heating and cooling cost.
Insulate attics after inspection by Community Action installers. Ceiling insulation is often the single most cost -effective measure that can be installed in the home. By installing insulation, up to 25 percent can be saved on heating cost.
Provide and install energy-efficient light bulbs. These bulbs can provide the same amount and quality of light as incandescent bulbs while using up to 75 percent less energy.
Fix or replace broken windows and glass upon inspection. This reduces the cost of heating a home in the winter and cooling a home in the summer.
Replacing broken glass in the home also improves both comfort and safety in that home.
Inspect, test, and repair or replace broken or hazardous furnaces, stoves, and water heaters upon inspection by installers afte r being deemed hazardous by the gas company.
Provide and install carbon monoxide detectors. This measure protects families against carbon monoxide buildup in the home.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-58 October 2022
The City also joined the Cl ean Power Alliance (CPA) in 2018, consistent with the CPA enrollment protocol, residential customers were enrolled in a phased manner beginning on February 1, 2019. Non-residential accounts were enrolled on their first meter read on or after May 1, 2019. A Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) program is a legal structure that allows cities and counties to aggregate the buying power of individual electricity customers within their jurisdictions in order to secure energy supply contracts on a community -wide basis. The purpose of aggregating the purchase of electricity is to create an alternative electrical service option to the incumbent utility, which in Oxnard is Southern California Edison (SCE). The California Alternate Rates for Energy Program (CARE) and Fam ily Electric Rate Assistance Program (FERA) program is available for all CPA and SCE customers.
In June 2013, the City approved a report on Energy Efficiency Programs and adopted Resolution No. 14,371 approving the City and Community Energy Action Plan (EAP) for the Southern California Edison (SCE) Energy Leadership Program Platinum Level. The EAP corresponds to the policies in the City’s General Plan. The EAP contains programs , which, when implemented , earn the City levels of achievement set out by SCE.
Oxnard’s building regulations for its downtown area encourage property owners to incorporate photovoltaic technology into their designs to increase local energy production and sustainability. The City is also currently preparing its climate action plan, which involves a review of all sectors of energy used by the community. This planning effort will examine and recommend how Oxnard’s leadership can make reductions in fossil fuel-based energy consumption for the future.
Listed below are Oxnard 2030 General Plan policies under Goal SC-3 that promote the production of energy-efficient homes and commercial and industrial buildings.
Effective green building design maximizes the use of a development while encouraging the cost-effective use of materials by reducing the use of materials and energy resources throughout the lifetime of the development. These recommended standards will promote and place restrictions that ensure energy efficiency in the construction and use of homes.
Goal SC-3 Energy Generation and Increased Efficiency (Energy Action Plan) Goal Energy efficiency performance standards and generation from renewable sources.
SC-3.1 New Residential Development
Encourage incorporation of passive and active energy and resources conservation design and devices in new residential development and substantial remodels and/or expansions.
SC-3.2 Develop a City Energy Action Plan
Develop an Energy Action Plan (EAP) that identifies feasible programs that reduce energy consumption within City government facilities and the City vehicle fleets by at least 10 percent below 2005 levels.
SC-3.3 Develop a Community Energy Action Plan
Develop a Community Energy Action Plan that identifies feasible programs that reduce private sector and institutional consumption of energy.
B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-59
SC-3.4 Alternative Energy for Public Buildings
As part of the City and Community EAP’s, transition City and other semipublic and large energy users to solar and wind energy sources over a reasonable and feasible time period.
SC-3.5 Load Shifting Devices
As part of the City EAP, consider installing devices on municipal buildings that reduce the power required to operate equipment and for shifting the equipment usage to off-peak hours.
SC-3.6 Targets for Zero-Emission Vehicles
As part of the City EAP, meet or exceed state targets for zero-emission fuel vehicle miles traveled within the City by supporting the use of zero emission vehicles (low speed “neighborhood electric vehicles”, utility low range battery electric vehicles, mid-range “city electric vehicles,” full function battery electric vehicles, and fuel cell vehicles) within City departments and divisions.
SC-3.7 Renewable Energy Production Requirement
As part of the City and Community EAP’s, require that master planned commercial and industrial developments incorporate solar, wind, and other renewable energy generation and transmission equipment unless demonstrated to the satisfaction of a qualified renewable energy consultant to be infeasible.
SC-3.8 Require Use of Passive Energy Conservation Design As par t of the City and Community EAPs, require the use of passive energy conservation by building material massing, orientation, landscape shading, materials, and other techniques as part of the design of local buildings, where feasible.
SC-3.9 Promote Voluntary Incentive Programs
Promote voluntary participation in incentive programs to increase the use of solar photovoltaic systems in new and existing residential, commercial, institutional and public buildings, including continued participation in the Ventura County Regional Energy Alliance (VCREA).
SC-3.10 Alternatives to Power Plant Generation
Evaluate the feasibility of incorporating alternative sources of power generation such as wind and tidal power into the regional existing power supply grid to reduce reliance on GHG emission producing public utility and privately owned power plants.
SC-3.11 Waste Conversion to Energy Facility
As part of the City and Community EAPs, evaluate the feasibility for the design and construction of a conversion technology capable of converting municipal solid waste into alternative sources of energy.
SC-3.12 Encourage Natural Ventilation
Review and revise applicable planning and building policies and regulations to promote us e of natural ventilation in new construction and major additions or remodeling consistent with Oxnard’s temperate climate.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-60 October 2022
The City of Oxnard adopted an Energy Action Plan (EAP) on June 25, 2013. This plan provides programs to achieve energy efficiency in government operations and community-wide activities. The plan provides a goal of achieving a 10- percent reduction in community -wide energy use. Community programs in the EAP are anticipated to achieve annual energy savings of 34,114,100 kilowatt -hours of electricity and 1,365.600 therms of natural gas by 2020, resulting in a reduction of approximately 27,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. Primary 2030 General Plan community programs recommended in the EAP relative to households in Oxnard are listed below, together with program descriptions:
Program C-2: Additional Outreach to Residents
The City would increase its education and outreach to local residents and owners of residential buildings to raise awareness of local, utility, state and federal energy saving programs.
Program C -3: Establish Partnerships between City Green Team and Local Agencies
The City’s Green Team would coordinate and network with their counterparts at local agencies, school districts, and nonprofits to share best -practices towards reducing energy consumption within the community and neighboring areas as well as reduce first-costs associated with implementing energy reduction strategies.
Program C-4: Implement Alternative Financing Mechanisms Beyond PACE programs, Oxnard should consider establishing additional financing mechanisms for residential and/or commercial energy performance assessments and system upgrades.
Program C-6: Promote Renewable Energy Generation
A possible barrier to installation of distributed renewable energy generation are zoning and building code regulations, up -front and financing costs, long cost - recovery periods, and access to information
Program C-7: Support Electric Vehicle Infrastructure
Plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles (EVs) help reduce GHG emissions and other air pollutants and have the potential to take advantage of distributed sources of renewable energy, such as solar panels. A recent report by the Union of Concerned Scientists illustrates that EVs in California would produce lower GHG emiss ions than even the most fuel -efficient hybrids. EVs charged entirely from renewable sources like wind and solar power produce virtually no GHG emissions. California is actively promoting plug -in hybrid and EVs to reduce dependence on foreign imported oil and meet the AB 32 GHG emissions reduction targets Program C-8: INCF Neighborhood Vintage Assessment Program The City is divided into 75 residential neighborhoods distinguished by geography and, in many cases, similar size and style of residential construction, referred to as housing and commercial “vintage.” The City’s neighborhoods are supported by the Inter-Neighborhood Council Forum (INCF), which serves as a venue for information exchange and coordination at the neighborhood level. Most neighborhoods are largely single-family subdivisions and often represent one or two vintage California and Oxnard development periods, such as 1920s bungalows and wood frame B. Existing Housing Needs
October 2022 Page B-61
homes, post-World War II small stucco homes, 1960s ranch-style homes, 1970s split foyer homes, and 1980s multifamily condominiums.
Program C-10: Create Residential PACE Program
Residential PACE programs are similar in concept to Commercial PACE programs (see EAP Program C-9), and are made possible through the same State Assembly Bill 811. Legal aspects, structure, and marketing of Residential PACE programs differ in several aspects. Residential PACE programs were delayed from 2010-2012 due to a ruling that the program may violate federal lending practices. However, funding is now available through the 14- county CaliforniaFIRST financing district funded by the California Energy Commission with Ventura County as the lead agency. Financing is available up to $35,000 for homeowners in 20 year loans with interest rates from 7 to 8 percent.
Program C-11: Expedite Permitting
Expedited permitting is a strong incentive to increase the number of energy efficiency, conservation and green building measures in construction projects, since the extra money spent to improve building performance is often offset by a shorter development timeline. Many California cities offer expedited permitting for green building projects using a checklist of green building/energy efficiency and conservation measures that must be included to be eligible for the expedited process.
Program C-15: Develop Renewable Energy Ordinance
Renewable Energy Ordinance would require certain new developments in the City to incorporate clean renewable energy generation into their plans.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page B-62 October 2022
This page intentionally left blank.
C
Populations with Special Housing Needs
October 2022 Page C-1
California state law requires under Government Code Section 65583(4)(D)(7) that the Housing Element include an analysis of housing for certain populations groups which include, but are not limited to, the following:
Persons with disabilities (including those with developmental disabilities)
Elderly
Large families and single-parent families
Farmworkers
Families and persons in Need of Emergency Housing
The housing needs associated with these and other demographic or occupational groups call for very specific program responses, such as the preservation of single- room occupancy hotels or the development of units with larger bedroom counts.
Families or individuals that belong to these groups are likely to encounter more difficulties in finding housing within their means and/or may spend a disproportionate amount of their income to secure safe and decent housing. These groups are sometimes subject to discrimination based on their specific needs or circumstances.
The Oxnard Housing Authority (OHA) currently maintains 1,825 Section 8 vouchers for persons in need of assistance for housing. There are approximately 4,400 applicants on the waitlist for vouchers, which is currently closed.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page C-2 October 2022
The following discussion evaluates the characteristics and most recent available quantitative data for the several housing needs groups identified in Oxnard.
C.1 Persons with Disabilities
Persons with disabilities face unique problems in obtaining affordable and adequate housing, with living arrangements and housing needs that vary based on the severity of the disability. This portion of Oxnard’s population includes individuals with mental, physical, and developmental disabilities, with a need for affordable, conveniently located housing specially adapted to the individual’s physical needs.
Many persons live at home in an independent environment with the help of other family members. To maintain independent living, disabled persons may require assistance. This can include special housing design features for the physically disabled, income support for those who are unable to work, and in-home supportive services for persons with medical conditions. Accessible housing can also be provided via senior housing developments.
Many disabled persons live on small , fixed incomes, which severely limits their ability to pay for housing. Persons with disabilities often have a higher rate of unemployment relative to other groups, with the sole source of income for most being a fixed pension provided by Social Security Disability Insurance, Social Security Insurance, or Social Security Old Age and Survivor’s Insurance. This allowance alone does not cover the costs of rent and basic living expenses.
Table C-1 summarizes persons with a disability in Oxnard by employment status, as well as elderly with a disability. Approximately 10 percent of Oxnard’s population is shown as having a disability. As shown in Table C-1, 17 percent of the disabled population in Oxnard is employed, while 2 percent of the disabled population is not employed.
C. Populations with Special Housing Needs
October 2022 Page C-3
Table C-1 Oxnard Persons with Disability by Employment Status , 2018 Persons with Disability Number Percentage of
Disabled Population
Percentage of
Total Population
TOTAL POPULATION - DISABILITIES
Under 5 years 162 1% 0%
5 to 17 years 1,799 9% 1%
18 to 34 years 2,170 10% 1%
35 to 64 years 8,282 40% 4%
65 to 74 years 3,389 16% 2%
75 years and over 5,002 24% 2%
TOTAL PERSONS WITH A DISABILITY 20,804 100% 10%
TOTAL POPULATION (CIVILIAN, NON-INSTITUTIONAL) 206,497
LABOR FORCE - DISABILITIES
Employed Persons 3,474 17% 2%
Not Employed Persons 483 2% 0%
Not in Labor Force 6,495 31% 3%
TOTAL PERSONS ELIGIBLE FOR THE LABOR FORCE
WITH A DISABILITY 10,452 50% 5%
TOTAL LABOR FORCE POPULATION (CIVILIAN, NON-
INSTITUTIONAL) 129,826
Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey - Table C18120, Table S1810 Note: Totals may not add due to rounding, and percentages displayed at zero percent may be due to rounding.
Table C-2 offers a breakdown of disability types by age group. The age group with the largest number of disabilities comprises persons ages 18 to 64 with a collective total of 21,652 disabilities. This accounts for approximately 47 percent of all disabilities in Oxnard. A person may have more than one type of disability. Most people with a disability had an ambulatory difficulty (58 percent of the population with disabilities).
Oxnard Housing Element
Page C-4 October 2022
Table C-2 Breakdown of Disability Type by Age Groups, 2018 0 to 17
Years
18 to 64
Years
65 Years
and Over Total
Percentage
of All
Disability
Types
Percentage
of Disabled
Population1
Hearing Difficulty 481 1,827 3,046 5,354 12% 26%
Vision Difficulty 459 2,259 2,014 4,732 10% 23%
Cognitive Difficulty 1,324 4,395 2,494 8,213 18% 39%
Ambulatory Difficulty 480 5,725 5,839 12,044 26% 58%
Self-care Difficulty 514 2,654 2,794 5,962 13% 29%
Independent Living Difficulty -- 4,792 4,685 9,477 21% 46% TOTAL DISABILITIES 3,258 21,652 20,872 45,782 100%
TOTAL DISABLED PERSONS 20,804
Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey – Table S1810 Note: 1. A person can fall under more than one disability type; therefore, total disabilities exceed the total number of disabled persons.
DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED
Since the passage of Senate Bill (SB) 812 in 2010, the City has been required to include the needs of individuals with a developmental disability in the community in the special housing needs analysis. According to Section 4512 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, a “developmental disability” means a disability that originates before an individual attains age 18 years, continues, or can be expected to continue, indefinitely, and constitutes a substantial disability for that individual, which includes mental retardation, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and autism.
Many developmentally disabled persons can live and work independently in a conventional housing environment. More severely disabled individuals require a group living environment where supervision is provided. The most severely affected individuals may require an institutional environment where medical attention and physical therapy are provided. Because developmental disabilities exist before adulthood, the first issue in supportive housing for the developmentally disabled is the transition from the person’s living situation as a child to an appropriate level of independence as an adult.
The California Department of Developmental Services (DDS) currently provides community-based services to approximately 304,044 persons with developmental disabilities and their families through a statewide system of 21 regional centers, 3 developmental centers, and 2 community-based facilities. The Tri-Counties Regional Center is one of 21 regional centers in California that provides point of entry to services for people with developmental disabilities. The center is a private, nonprofit community agency that contracts with local businesses to offer a wide range of services to individuals with developmental disabilities and their families.
C. Populations with Special Housing Needs
October 2022 Page C-5
Table C-3, provided by the Southern California Association of Governments , provides information about the age of Oxnard’s population of developmentally disabled persons.
Table C-3 Developmentally Disabled Residents by Age : 2019 0–17 Years 18+ Years Total
City of Oxnard 1,639 1,033 2,672
Source: SCAG 2020 Pre-Certified Local Housing Data – Oxnard; CA DDS consumer county by CA ZIP by age group for the end of June 2019.
Table C-4 provides information about developmentally disabled residents by residence type. There are a number of housing types appropriate for people living with a developmental disability: rent-subsidized homes, licensed and unlicensed single-family homes, homes that accept Section 8 vouchers, special programs for home purchase, US Department of Housing and Urban Development ( HUD) housing, and SB 962 homes. The design of housing-accessibility modifications, the proximity to services and transit, and the availability of group living opportunities represent some of the types of considerations that are important in serving this need group. Incorporating “barrier-free” design in all new multifamily housing (as required by California and federal fair housing laws) is especially important to provide the widest range of choices for disabled residents. Special consideration should also be given to the affordability of housing, as people with disabilities may be living on a fixed income.
In order to assist in the housing needs for persons with developmental disabilities, the City will implement programs to coordinate housing activities and outreach with the Tri-Counties Regional Center . The City will seek to encourage housing providers to designate a portion of new affordable housing developments for persons with disabilities, especially persons with developmental disabilities, and pursue funding sources designated for persons with special needs and disabilities.
Program 22 addresses the needs of the developmentally disabled.
Table C-4 Developmentally Disabled Residents by Residence Type in Oxnard: 2019 Community
Care Facility
Foster/Family
Home
Intermediate
Care Facility
Independent
Living/
Supported
Living
Home of
Parent/Family/Guardian Other Total
62 15 41 85 1,431 5 1,639
Source: SCAG 2020 Pre-Certified Local Housing Data – Oxnard; CA DDS consumer county by CA ZIP by residence type for the end of June 2019.
Table C-5 presents an inventory of Ventura County and Oxnard facilities that offer housing and housing-related support services to persons with disabilities and other special needs.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page C-6 October 2022
Table C-5 Agencies Serving Special Needs Populations
Provider Area of
Service Serving Description of Service
AIDS Care, Inc. County HIV and persons
with AIDS
Emergency funds for those with HIV+ and
AIDS. Operates Christopher House.
ARC Ventura County (Association for
Retarded Citizens) County Developmentally
disabled adults
Residential care home for developmentally
disabled adults. Other non-housing-related
assistance.
Behavioral Health,
Homeless/Emergency Shelter
Program
County Mentally ill
Emergency shelter program provides food and
shelter to homeless, mentally ill individuals
through voucher system. Programs for adults
and children. Coordinates with Catholic
Charities Community Services.
Casa de Esperanza County Mentally ill Housing for 45 mentally ill adults.
Casa Pacifica County Children Facility for short-term and intermediate shelter for abused and neglected children.
Cypress Court Oxnard Mentally ill Independent living for persons with serious mental illness.
Paseo de Luz Oxnard Mentally ill Independent living for persons with serious mental illness.
Paseo Santa Clara Mentally ill Independent living for persons with serious mental illness.
Coalition for Family Harmony County All Shelter and other non-housing-related assistance.
Habitat for Humanity County Farmworkers Development of homes for farmworkers and others.
Hillmont House County Mentally ill Short-term crisis center with 15 beds.
Independent Living Resources Center County Disabled Counseling, referrals for subsidized housing.
Khepera Alcoholism Recovery House County Men Housing and recovery services for men with alcohol problems.
Lighthouse Women and Children’s
Mission County Women and
children
Life recovery (drug, alcohol, and life-challenging
issues). Program for women and children.
OASIS (Older Adult Services and
Intervention System County Seniors
Care planning to frail elderly 60+ years.
Alzheimer's ID programs. Referrals made to
appropriate services to help clients remain at
home.
Prototype Women's Center County Women
Housing and recovery services for women (and
their children) with drug and/or alcohol
problems.
Senior Case Management County Seniors
Assists frail elderly to remain in their home
environment through the use of community
services.
C. Populations with Special Housing Needs
October 2022 Page C-7
Provider Area of
Service Serving Description of Service
Senior Home Sharing County Seniors Matches seniors with other seniors or younger people who want to share housing.
Senior Outreach Services County Seniors
Geriatric mental health specialists evaluate
adults over 65 to determine if mental health
services are needed.
Shamrock House County Adults Residential treatment for drug and alcohol abuse.
TenderLife Maternity Home County Pregnant young
women
Provides housing and other non-housing-
related assistance.
Training for Independent Living County Developmentally
disabled adults See ARC Ventura County
Turning Point Foundation County Mentally ill
Drop-in center for homeless mentally ill and
clients in west Ventura. Other non-housing-
related assistance.
Ventura County Coalition Against
Violence County Women and
children
Provides safe emergency shelter to battered
women and their children, hotline, educational
outreach, and support groups.
Ventura County Commission on Aging County Elderly One-time eviction prevention, move-in costs, other non-housing-related assistance.
Ventura County Health Care Agency County AIDS Case management, housing referrals.
Ventura County Rescue Mission County Men
Place for men to stay who are transients. Meals
and bed for up to 10 consecutive nights.
Includes 1-year, live-in free alcohol and drug
recovery program.
Wooley House Oxnard Mentally ill Independent living and/or residential care for persons with serious mental illness.
Source: PlaceWorks and City of Oxnard, 2021
C.2 Elderly
The term s “ elderly” or “senior” households in this section refer to households headed by a person who is 65 years of age or older. Senior households may have special housing needs primarily due to physical disabilities and limitations, income level, and healthcare costs. As shown in Table C-6, there were 8,811 senior households in Oxnard in 2010. Of that number, 76% of senior households were owner-occupied. From 2010 to 2018, total senior households in Oxnard increased by 14 percent. The majority of senior households in 2018 still consisted of owner- occupied households ( 74 percent of total senior households) , with 4,040 senior households 65–74 years of age, and 3,373 senior households 75 years or older .
There was a sizable increase in renter-occupied households 65–74 years of age between 2010 and 2018 from 2,101 to 2,627 households.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page C-8 October 2022
Table C-6 Oxnard Elderly Household s, 2010 to 2018
Householder Age
2010 2018 Percentage Change,
2010 to 2018 Households Percentage Households Percentage Owner-Occupied
65–74 years 3,627 41% 4,040 40% 11%
75 plus years 3,083 35% 3,373 34% 9%
Renter-Occupied
65–74 years 1,114 13% 1,907 19% 71%
75 plus years 987 11% 720 7% -27%
TOTAL 8,811 100% 10,040 100% 14%
Source: 2005-2009 American Community Survey – B25116; 2014-2018 American Community Survey – Table B25007 As shown in Table C -7, in Ventura County as a whole, there are 70,983 senior households. In Oxnard, there are 9,673 senior households, which makes up 14 percent of all senior households in Ventura County. The largest income group amongst seniors in Ventura County earns between $75,000 to $99,999 annually, consisting of 12 percent of all senior households in the County. Similarly, in Oxnard, 11 percent of senior households in the city fall into this income range.
C. Populations with Special Housing Needs
October 2022 Page C-9
Table C-7 Ventura County and Oxnard Household Income for Households Over 65 Years of Age, 2018
Household Income
Ventura County Oxnard
Estimate Percentage Estimate Percentage
Less than $10,000 2,952 4% 496 5%
$10,000 to $14,999 3,598 5% 634 7%
$15,000 to $19,999 3,822 5% 648 7%
$20,000 to $24,999 3,805 5% 616 6%
$25,000 to $29,999 3,319 5% 421 4%
$30,000 to $34,999 3,270 5% 464 5%
$35,000 to $39,999 3,199 5% 547 6%
$40,000 to $44,999 3,367 5% 550 6%
$45,000 to $49,999 2,324 3% 156 2%
$50,000 to $59,999 5,091 7% 767 8%
$60,000 to $74,999 6,559 9% 948 10%
$75,000 to $99,999 8,277 12% 1,104 11%
$100,000 to $124,999 6,095 9% 823 9%
$125,000 to $149,999 4,008 6% 358 4%
$150,000 to $199,999 4,889 7% 645 7%
$200,000 or more 6,408 9% 496 5%
Total 70,983 100% 9,673 100%
Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey – Table B19037 C.3 Large Families and Single-Parent Families
LARGE FAMILIES
A large family is described by HUD as a family or household with five or more members. Table C-8 shows the distribution of large owner- and renter-occupied households in Oxnard from 2010 to 2018. According to the 2010 Census, there were 16,756 households in Oxnard that had five or more members. This number decreased to 14,558 large households in 2018. The total proportion of large households with five or more members decreased from 2010 to 2018, from 34 percent of the total households to 28 percent.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page C-10 October 2022
Table C-8 Large Households by Tenure, 2010 to 2018
2010 2018
Households
Percentage of
Total
Households
Households
Percentage of
Total
Households
Owner-Occupied Large Households 8,820 18% 6,825 13%
Renter-Occupied Large Households 7,936 16% 7,733 15%
Total Large Households 16,756 34% 14,558 28%
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 49,797 100% 51,460 100%
Source: 2010 Census; 2014-2018 American Community Survey - Table B19037
SINGLE-PARENT HEADS OF HOUSEHOLD
Single-parent households, particularly female-headed households, generally have lower incomes and higher living expenses than other households. A female-headed household is defined as a female with no spouse present living with at least one child under the age of 18. Single parents contribute more of their monthly income to the cost of m aintaining and supplying a home, qualifying some female-headed households to need special housing.
Table C-9 compares the household demographics of Oxnard for the years 2010 to 2018. There has been a slight increase (seven percent) in families from 2010 to 2018. The largest percentage increase has occurred in male-headed households with no spouse present, which rose 36 percent between 2010 to 2018 from 3,354 households to 4,563 household and now comprises 11 percent of total households; these families may need assistance in housing. Female-headed households increased the most by number, from 7,465 household in 2010 to 9,563 households in 2018, representing 23 percent of total households in Oxnard in 2018. Of these female-headed households, 6,206, or 15 percent of all households , had children under the age of 18.
C. Populations with Special Housing Needs
October 2022 Page C-11
Table C-9 Oxnard Family Head of Household Dis tribution, 2010 and 2018 Family Householder
2010 Households 2018 Households
Percentage Change
2010 to 2018 Number Percentage
of Total Number Percentage
of Total
Total Family Households 38,803 41,687 7%
with own children under 18 21,161 55% 24,487 59% 16%
Married-Couple Family 27,984 72% 27,586 66% -1%
with own children under 18 15,678 40% 15,662 38% 0%
Male Householder, no wife present 3,354 9% 4,563 11% 36% with own children under 18 1442 4% 2,619 6% 82%
Female Householder, no husband
present 7,465 19% 9,538 23% 28%
with own children under 18 4,041 10% 6,206 15% 54%
Sources: 2010 Census; 2014-2018 American Community Survey - Table B17012
COLLEGE STUDENTS
Some Oxnard residents may attend one of t hree public colleges or universities in the immediate area and may qualify as in need of housing based on low-income or other criteria.
Ventura County Community College District (Oxnard College). Founded in 1975, the college is accessible from the Ventura Freeway or the Pacific Coast Highway.
As of Spring Semester 2020, approximately 6,600 students are enrolled at Oxnard College.
California State University, Channel Islands. California State University (CSU) Channel Islands is the twenty-third campus of the CSU system and the first four - year public university in Ventura County. The universit y offers baccalaureate and master’s degrees in business, natural sciences, computer sciences, the arts, and teacher education to a Fall 2020 enrollment of approximately 7,000 students.
Students living in the City of Oxnard may also commute to colleges located outside of Oxnard for class offerings not available locally. Many Oxnard residents may enroll in classes at the Ventura Community College, located at 4667 Telegraph Road in the city of Ventura, that are not available at Oxnard College. Other nearby colleges that may serve students residing in Oxnard include Moorpark College, a community college located approximately 30 miles east of Oxnard in Moorpark, and California Lutheran University, a private university in Thousand Oaks.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page C-12 October 2022
C.4 Farmworkers
FARMWORKER POPULATION
The US Department of Agriculture has noted that although hired farmworkers make up less than one percent of all U.S. wage and salary workers, they play an essential role in U.S. agriculture. Due to the generally low wages associated with labor related work such as field workers, packing house workers, and nursery workers; farmworker households can generally be classified as very low- or extremely low- income. This makes farmworkers and their families particularly vulnerable to living in overcrowded, substandard dwelling conditions along with inadequate bathroom, kitchen, and heating facilities. The agricultural nature of Ventura County shows comparable demographic characteristics as those listed by the Census. Ventura County has year-round agricultural production and farmworkers are more likely to establish permanent residences in Oxnard and Santa Paula where most agricultural processing is located. Estimating the size of the agricultural labor force is problematic, as farmworkers are historically undercounted by the US Census and other data sources. Farmworkers are notoriously difficult to count due to their mobility, the shared and substandard housing available to them, their fear of authorities, and their lack of involvement in a foreign and unfamiliar culture.1 Data is more available at the County level, than at the City level. Some of the data in this section was included in the County of Ventura’s Draft Housing Element and also provides data and context relevant to Oxnard. Farmworkers are typically categorized into three groups: permanent, seasonal, and migrant. Permanen t farmworkers are employed year -round by the same employer. A seasonal farmworker works, on average, less than 150 days per year and earns at least half of his/her earned income from farm work. Migrant farmworkers are travelling seasonal farmworkers who “follow the crops” and may not have a local permanent residence.
There are several estimates of the number of farmworkers in Ventura County , detailed below.
2017 Census of Agriculture, Table 7, Hired Farm Labor – Workers and Payroll, l isted 22,694 workers: 10,529 worked 150 days or more, 12,165 less than 150 days. The total farmworker payroll was $ 364.4 million, or about $12,075 each. Based on a total number of 2,135 farms in Ventura County, 85 percent employed fewer than 10 employees. While small farms are prevale nt, 89 percent of farmworkers work on large farms with over 10 workers. Data on farmworkers in Ventura County is presented in Table C-10. 2018 American Community Survey (ACS) reports that there is a total of 18,319 farmworkers in Ventura County. The ACS data is not a good representation of the farmworker population since the data combines persons employed in farming with persons employed in forestry,
1 The Agricultural Worker Health Study: Case Study No. 3 - Oxnard and Santa Clara Valley.
Kurt Schroeder et. Al., California Institute for Rural Studies, January 2003.
C. Populations with Special Housing Needs
October 2022 Page C-13
fishing, and hunting, and does not provide any distinction between high and low wage occupations. The ACS a lso excludes labor provided by farm labor contractors 1, which significantly underestimates the number of farmworkers. It is estimated that roughly one third of all California farmworkers are employed by farm labor contractors.
Table C-10 Farmworkers in Ventura County and California: 2017 Ventura County California
Farms (number) 2,135 70,521
Hired farm labor (farms) 1,151 30,421
Hired farm labor (workers) 22,694 377,593
Workers by days worked – 150 days or more 10,529 187,875 Workers by days worked – less than 150 days 12,165 189,718 Migrant farm labor on farms with hired labor 2,804 86,179 Migrant farm labor on farms reporting only contract labor 791 18,878 Source: 2017 USDA Census of Agriculture, Tables 1 and 7 As of 2020, SCAG reports (using 2014–2018 American Community Survey data) the number of farmworkers in Oxnard as 12,799, or approximately 13 percent of all workers in Oxnard. The subset of this group that are full- time, year-round farming, fishing, and forestry workers in Oxnard is less than half of this total amount at 5,342 workers.
A Farm Labor study conducted by the University of California in Davis, estimates an even higher number of farmworkers in Ventura County. The study utilized wage and tax data from the Califor nia Employment Development Department, and estimated that Ventura County employed approximately 36,500 farmworkers in 2012. Therefore, depending on the data source, the estimated number of farmworkers in Ventura County ranges from 18,000 to 36,500 persons . Based on information received from the Ventura County Agricultural Commissioner and the local House Farm Workers! Task Force, the higher end of the range is more accurate and should be used for estimating farmworker housing needs.
Additionally, the majority of farmworker households within the County reside within the greater Oxnard area, including the incorporated City, and the unincorporated communities of El Rio and Nyeland Acres.
Additionally, the farmworker population in Ventura County is shifting. A significant portion of the farmworker population in Ventura County consist of indigenous migrants from Mexico that do not speak Spanish. The indigenous migrants come from the Mexican states of Oaxaca, Guerrero and Michoacan, including Mixtecs, Zapotecs, and Purepechas. These populations face unique challenges including language barriers, as they often only speak their native pre -Hispanic indigenous
1 University of California Agricultural Personnel Management Program, http://are.berkeley.edu/APMP/pubs/flc/farmlabor, 2004-5.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page C-14 October 2022
languages. They also have deep- rooted and unique cultural practices and beliefs that often create barriers and isolate them from other Latino populations.
FARM LABOR TRENDS
In order to understand the changing trends in farming and farmworker households and their housing needs, the County reached out to representatives in the agricultural industry as part of their Housing Element Update. The representatives consisted of local growers, labor advocates, business interests, farmworker housing advocates, local government such as the Agricultural Commissioner’s Office, and nonprofit housing developers. Though these d iscussions did not result in a more accurate count of farmworkers, they did provide a more germane and local picture of farmworker households and their housing needs. The discussions revealed that most farmworkers residing in Ventura County work either seasonally or year-round.
Most farmworkers need housing which can accommodate families, such as single- family housing or multifamily apartment units. Additionally, there are two other types of farmworkers that have different housing needs:
Migrant individuals or families (defined as traveling to do farm work and unable to return to permanent residence on the same day). The numbers of migrant workers have declined in the past decade. Migrant workers still need permanent homes.
H-2A crews of workers. These are farmworkers who enter under a federal guest worker program for a limited number of months (no more than 10) before they return to their country of origin. H -2A visa workers require a sponsoring employer, who provides housing, meals and transportation to the job site. Anecdotally, it appears that the number of H-2A visa workers in Ventura County are increasing yearly due to a shortage of locally based farm labor available for seasonal work such as harvesting. According to the Mexican Consulate
1 in Oxnard, there were 1,500 H-2A visas issued in
2020. H-2A visa workers can share homes or apartments to be housed in bunkhouses, dormitories, or single occupancy rooms. Since very few bunkhouses exist, the employers of H -2A workers now compete with permanent farmworkers for scarce affordable homes and apartments.
Notwithstanding the difficulties associated with procuring a precise count of the farmworker population, the total number of farmworkers in Ventura County appears to have increased over the last two decades. This may be partly explained by changes in crop type and the related value of the specialty crops, which are more labor intensive. The Ventura County Agricultural Commissioner’s 2019 Crop and Livestock Report estimated that the gross value of Ventura County’s agricultural industry was approximately two billion dollars, making it one of the top 10 agricultural counties in the state. Over the last two decades, the cultivation of labor- intensive and high yield crops has increased. Ranked in order of financial yield, the report listed strawberries as the highest value crop in the County, followed by celery, lemons, raspberries, nursery stock, avocados, tomatoes, cut flowers, peppers, and
1 Draft County of Ventura 2021-2029 Housing Element Update, June, 2021.
C. Populations with Special Housing Needs
October 2022 Page C-15
hemp. Industrial hemp was reintroduced into Ventura County in 2018, repl acing cabbage as the tenth leading crop.
TYPES OF HOUSING NEEDED FOR FARMWORKERS
Like most families, farmworker households require housing near both the agricultural fields and packing houses where they are employed and areas convenient to shopping, schools, and other support services. For this reason, the vast majority of farmworker households reside in conventional, lower -income housing located within the existing cities near the irrigated farmland (e.g., Oxnard, Santa Paula, Fillmore, and Ventura) and the existing unincorporated communities of El Rio, Nyeland Acres, Saticoy, Somis, and Piru. Anecdotal information provided by sources close to the agricultural community indicates that many farmworker households reside in single family residences with multi ple families sleeping in garages or detached accessory buildings. The global pandemic of 2020-21 made it clear that a safe and secure food supply requires a healthy trained and stable workforce, which is more attainable when essential workers have the ability to live in affordable, quality housing. The California Department of Public Health listed “transmission in overcrowded housing” as one of the top contributing factors to the high rate of COVID -19 virus infections in Ventura County
1. Farmworker familie s
sharing private rentals and farmworkers in the H-2A visa program living in dormitory style housing are likely to live in more overcrowded conditions. HCD maintains a list of farmworker labor camps licensed by the State of California. Table C-11 lists the licensed farmworker camps in Ventura County by camp name, location, and number of individuals and families that can be accommodated. All of these camps are located in the unincorporated area of the c ounty, with the exception of the Garden City camp in Oxnard which received City approval for remodeling and the addition of 32 units of special needs housing in 2018. Camp Vanessa in Oxnard is also included although it is not a State-licensed camp. Camp Vanessa, which was extensively remodeled in 2019 and 2020, is the only camp on the list within the Oxnard city limits that was a Bracero Program camp constructed during World War II for temporary Mexican labor. Within the City of Oxnard’s incorporated area, there are four farmworker family housing projects that were developed by Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation (CEDC) and are deed restricted for farm worker families, including Meta Street Apartments (24 farm worker units), Villa Victoria Apartments (27 farm worker units), Villa Cesar Chavez Apartments (52 farm worker units) and Camino Gonzalez Apartments (18 farm worker units). These developments were approved and constructed, consistent with the City’s Planning and Zoning regulations for multifamily housing. Additionally, a 58 unit farm worker family and veteran housing project located on Etting Road, which included 42 units for farm workers and 15 units for veterans, and a manager’s unit, has been approved. On February 2, 2020, the Ventura County Board of Supervisors approved the Somis Ranch Farmworker Housing Project, a 360 -unit farmworker housing complex with 1, 2 and 3 -bedroom units. This development would include two 3,000 square foot community centers, tot lots/playgrounds, play fields and basketball courts.
1 Rode, Erin (2020, July 4). Overcrowded housing is contributing to coronavirus spread in Ventura County. Ventura County Star.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page C-16 October 2022
Table C-11 State-Licensed Farmworker Camps in Ventura County Facility Name Address Property Owner
Permanent or
Temporary
Permit
Notes
B-Camp 2512 Balboa St., Oxnard Leo B. Jennings Permanent 15 units individuals and families
Fillmore Labor Camp 743½ Sespe Pl., Fillmore Villasenor Enterprises Permanent 137 units
individuals
Garden City Camp 5690 Cypress Rd., Oxnard
Lorenzo Castillo/
Castillo Cypress,
LLC
Permanent 40 beds
individuals only
La Campana 2297 Sycamore, Fillmore Limoneira Permanent 18 units individuals and families
Leavens Ranches 12681 Broadway Rd.,
Moorpark
Leavens
Ranches Permanent 14 units
individuals and families
Limol 1141 Cummings Rd., Santa
Paula Limoneira Permanent 157 units
individuals and families
Los Posas Orchards 5242 N. Olive Hill Rd.,
Somis Somis Pacific Temporary 16 units
families
McKevett Padre Dr., Santa Paula Limoneira Permanent 9 units individuals and families
Newhall Ranch 4.5 miles east of Piru Newhall Land &
Farming Permanent 18 units
individuals and families
Orchard Farm Santa Paula Limoneira Permanent 11 units
individuals and families
Piru Square 665 Piru Square Trinidad Vasquez Permanent 6 units 15 individuals
Rancho Guadalasca 1 Caryl Dr., Oxnard John Boone Permanent 9 units families
Rancho Media Dia 1989 Hondo Rancho Rd.,
Somis Grether Farming Permanent 10 units
families
Somis Nursery 5612 Donlon Rd., Somis Somis Nursery Permanent 10 units individuals and families
Total Licensed Farmworker Units 470 units
Camp Vanessa
(unlicensed) 1700 E. 5th Street, Oxnard Reiter Affiliated Companies Permanent 300 beds
Source: City of Oxnard, 2015, confirmed 2020.
C. Populations with Special Housing Needs
October 2022 Page C-17
C.5 Families and Persons in Need of Emergency Housing
HUD considers someone homeless if that person resides in an emergency shelter; transitional or supportive housing for homeless persons who originally came from the streets or emergency shelter; or places not meant for human habitation, such as cars, parks, sidewalks , and abandoned buildings . In addition, homeless individuals may include released prison inmates who have returned to Oxnard as their last place of known residence but who have nowhere to live.
A shelter provides families and/or individuals a place to stay wit h facilities for a maximum of 180 days; a transitional housing facility provides shelter for a typical maximum of two years. The family or individual must put forward no more than 30 percent of their adjusted gross income toward housing costs. Shelters and transitional housing are generally developed and managed by nonprofit and/or faith- based organizations that may differ in the populations served and how their facilities and programs operate. They do not charge for their services.
In 2020, there were 1,743 homeless adults and children on a given day in Ventura County, based on one point-in-time count, as shown in Table C-12.
Table C-12 Home less Count by Jurisdiction, 2020
Jurisdiction Homeless
Counted
Percentage
of Homeless Jurisdiction Homeless
Counted
Percentage
of Homeless
Camarillo 30 2% Santa Paula 95 5%
Fillmore 10 1% Simi Valley 162 9%
Moorpark 0 0 Thousand Oaks 152 9%
Ojai 49 3% Ventura 531 30%
Oxnard 567 33% Unincorporated County 128 7%
Port Hueneme 19 1% Total 1,743 100%
Source: Ventura County Continuum of Care Alliance: Homeless County and Subpopulation Survey, April 2020 The total number of persons counted in Oxnard in 2020 was 567, or approximately 33 percent of the countywide total . Of this total number of homeless persons , unsheltered individuals considered chronically homeless were estimated at approximately 67 individuals. chronically homeless individuals are people who have lived in emergency shelters and/or on streets or abandoned buildings for the past year or more. Per the
Ventura County 2020 Homeless County and Subpopulation
Survey: Final Report, April 2020, a breakdown of the data collected from chronically homeless adults in the City of Oxnard is as follows:
Gender: 69 percent of adults (161) were men, 30 percent (71) were women, and less than one percent (1) were non binary.
Ethnicity: 57 percent (132) were Hispanic or Latino; 54 percent of adults ( 127) were White; 8 percent ( 20) were African American or Black; 2 percent (5 ) were American Indian or Alaskan Native; 1 percent (3) were Asian/Pacific Islander; and 34 percent (78) stated Other or their racial/ethnic background was unknown.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page C-18 October 2022
Released from correctional institutions : 17 percent of homeless individuals, or 39 persons total that had recently been released from a correctional institution, were reported homeless in the 2020 survey. At the time of the survey, these homeless individuals had been released from a correctional institution within the past 12 months.
Homelessness is one of the more complex issues in Oxnard and Ventura County as a whole. The lack of income by many of the homeless combined with the changes in state and federal support programs for the mentally and physically disabled, veterans, and others have made homelessness a difficult issue. The 2020 County of Ventura Homeless Count report is included by reference as the best available documentation regarding the homeless population.
Table C-13 summarizes the local government, nonprofit organizations, faith-based organizations, and community service groups that provide housing or related assistance to the homeless or low-income families of individuals in Ventura County.
Table C-14 summarizes shelters offered by the City of Oxnard.
C. Populations with Special Housing Needs
October 2022 Page C-19
Table C-13 Agencies Serving Homeless and Low-Income Persons Service Provider Location Services Provided
Alcohol and Drug Programs,
Mom and Kids Recovery
Center
Ventura Short-term housing voucher program for women and children in need of housing while in treatment program.
Cabrillo Economic
Development Corporation County
Develops low- and moderate-income housing projects in the county. Also leadership development, community organization, management training, and resource development. Provides housing for permanent, seasonal, and migrant farmworkers.
Candelaria American Indian
Council Ventura Emergency assistance (food and shelter) and job linkage for American Indian clients and veterans. Information and referral.
Care and Share Simi One-time emergency services, food and shelter. Eviction prevention.
Catholic Charities*
Ventura,
Moorpark,
Thousand Oaks
Emergency shelter vouchers, temporary emergency material aid. Counseling. Rental assistance, food pantries.
Community Action of Ventura
County
Oxnard,
Ventura
Financial assistance provided (when available) for eviction prevention and move-in cost assistance. Case management and other support services to prevent reoccurrence of
homelessness. Weatherization services, utility assistance, and food distribution.
Habitat for Humanity County Building of affordable homes for lower-income and farmworker households
Housing Authorities
County Area Housing Authority* Newbury Park
Administer HUD Section 8 Rental Assistance and conventional public housing projects. Provide fair housing counseling.
Waiting lists vary from 3 to 6 years.
Oxnard Housing Authority Oxnard
Port Hueneme Housing
Authority Port Hueneme
Santa Paula Housing Authority Santa Paula
Ventura City Housing Authority Ventura
Human Services Agency
Homeless I & R Program County Information and referral. Outreach, assessment, and brief casework for homeless individuals and families.
Interface Youth Crisis Services Ventura Hotline counseling, shelter for homeless, abused, or runaway children.
Jewish Family Services* Thousand
Oaks, Ventura
Services to homeless and other non-housing-related
assistance.
Khepera House Ventura Residential drug/alcohol recovery program and graduate houses for men.
Lighthouse Women and
Children’s Mission County
Overnight shelter, emergency shelter program for homeless women and children, employment search program for homeless women and children, and a life recovery (drug, alcohol, and life- challenging issues) program for women and children.
Lutheran Social Services* Thousand Oaks Eviction prevention, move-in assistance, and other non- housing-related assistance. Seniors-Caring Neighbor Program.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page C-20 October 2022
Service Provider Location Services Provided
Many Mansions County
Affordable housing and life-enriching services to low-income residents of Ventura County. Own 9 apartment-style properties that provide housing to over 1,300 individuals in need.
Miracle House Ventura Residential recovery program for women with dual dependency on drugs and alcohol.
Project Understanding Ventura Small loans and grants for move-in expenses, eviction prevention, and other non-housing-related assistance.
Saint John's Community
Outreach Oxnard Emergency lodging and other non-housing-related assistance.
Revolving loan fund.
Salvation Army – Oxnard Corps Oxnard Food pantry and non-housing-related assistance.
Salvation Army – Service
Extension* Simi Short-term lodging vouchers, other non-housing-related assistance.
Salvation Army – Ventura
Corps Ventura Short-term lodging vouchers, other non-housing-related assistance.
Senior Homesharing Ventura Matches seniors with other seniors and non-seniors in need of shared housing.
Turning Point Foundation Ventura Drop-in center and shelter for homeless mentally ill and clients in west Ventura, other non-housing-related assistance.
Ventura County Council on
Aging Oxnard Senior services.
Ventura County Rescue
Mission (VCRMA) County
Meals for the public, emergency shelter for men, and an alcohol and drug recovery program for men. Also has a separate facility that provides housing for women and children. Provides a safe harbor 24-hour emergency shelter.
Victory Outreach Recovery
Homes
Ventura,
Oxnard Drug recovery homes for men and women.
Source: Ventura County Draft Housing Element, January 2008; 2000 County of Ventura Consolidated Plan (Updated); re-confirmed by City of Oxnard, 2020.
* These providers are located in the eastern portion of Ventura County and more difficult to reach for an Oxnard homeless person.
C. Populations with Special Housing Needs
October 2022 Page C-21
Table C-14 Oxnard Homeless Shelter Programs
Program 2020 Capacity
RAIN Transitional Living Center
(transitional housing for homeless individuals or families) 65 persons Khepera House (located in Ventura but receives Oxnard funding support) 6 men Gabriel’s House - Kingdom Center at 1450 Rose Avenue
(residential program) 45 adults and children
Ventura County Rescue Mission - Lighthouse at 104 N Hayes Avenue (emergency shelter and residential life skills program) 32 persons (emergency shelter)
44 persons (residential program)
Oxnard Navigation Center operated by Mercy House at 351 S K Street 110 beds total
(68 beds at PAL and 42 beds at the
Armory on K St.)
Ventura County Rescue Mission (VCRMA)
(emergency shelter, residential life skills program, permanent housing for graduates of residential life skills program)
46 persons (emergency shelter)
85 persons (residential program)
22 persons (permanent housing)
Source: City of Oxnard, 2020
PROPOSED NAVIGATION CENTER
At the direction of the City Manager, the City is seeking to develop a new mixed- use multi -level building that will include a Navigation Center, office space for supportive service providers, and permanent supportive housing units.
The City owns property at 241 West Second St. in Downtown Oxnard. On June 30, 2020 the City Council approved an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) by and between Community Development Partners (CDP) and the City of Oxnard in consideration of constructing a new mixed- use development known as the Homeless Solutions Center which will include a navigation center and permanent supportive housing on the approximate 22,000 square foot City -owned property.
Community Development Partners is an experienced multifamily and mixed- use developer focused exclusively on creating and preserving vibrant affordable housing communities. The proposed mixed-use project will be five levels high and will include approximately 13,078 square feet of homeless shelter space that would accommodate 110 beds, 2,640 square feet of office space for leasing and supportive services, and (56) fifty-six permanent supportive housing units.
The Homeless Solutions Center development received approval of a Major Downtown Design Development Review (DDR) Permit and a Lot Line Adjustment (Merger) at the Community Development Director Hearing held on November 30, 2020 and subsequently received Planning Commission approval on December 17, 2020 for a Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow for the operation of the homeless shelter and resource center onsite and ministerial approval of a Density Bonus Permit to reduce the parking requirements for the site to a single space for the shelter, although the project will be providing ten (10) spaces on site. The City Oxnard Housing Element
Page C-22 October 2022
anticipates executing the DDA with the developer, pending City Council approval of the DDA by March 2021.
D
P ROJECTED HOUSING N EEDS
October 2022 Page D-1
D.1 Regional Housing Needs Assessment
California state law requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO s) to determine the existing and projected housing need for their regions. The County of Ventura and City of Oxnard are part of the Southern California Asso ciation of Governments (SCAG) MPO, which also includes Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial counties. For each Housing Element planning cycle, SCAG determines the share of existing and projected housing need by affordability level using the Regional Housing Need Assessment (RHNA) process for its 192 member jurisdictions. SCAG adopted the Final RHNA methodology on March 5, 2020 and draft RHNA assessments for each SCAG jurisdiction were generated in September, 2020. Jurisdictions were allowed to appeal the draft RHNA assessment: the appeal hearings and decisions ended in February, 2021. The final RHNA allocations were approved on March 4 , 2021 and are used in this draft Housing Element.
SCAG’s RHNA process is consistent with the requirements of Senate Bill (SB) 375 which requires each MPO to create a “Sustainable Communities Strategy” (SCS) that demonstrates how the five-county region will meet the State’s greenhouse gas emission targets through coordinated transportation and housing planning. SCAG’s SCS generally requires more housing near transit stations and along transit corridors, more housing in jobs -rich areas, and more jobs in housing- rich areas.
Additional details on the RHNA methodology are available on SCAG’s website at <www.scag.ca.gov/rhna>. Table D-1 shows the RHNA allocation for each of the cities and the unincorporated area in Ventura County by five income levels benchmarked to the Ventura County median household income (MHI) of 2018.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page D-2 October 2022
Table D-1 Ventura County 2021–2029 Regio nal Housing Needs Assessment Allocation Jurisdiction
Extremely
Low-Income
(30% or less
of MHI)
Very Low-
Income
(31%–50%
of MHI)
Low-Income
(51%–80% of
MHI)
Moderate-
Income
(81%–120%
of MHI)
Above
Moderate-
Income
(>120% of
MHI)
Total
Units
Camarillo 176 177 244 271 508 1,376
Fillmore 36 37 61 72 209 415
Moorpark
188 189 233 245 434 1,289
Ojai 6 7 9 10 21 53
Oxnard 920 920 1,071 1,538 4,100 8,549
Port Hueneme 13 13 16 18 65 125
San Buenaventura 593 594 865 950 2,310 5,312
Santa Paula 51 51 99 121 335 657
Simi Valley 374 375 493 518 1,033 2,793
Thousand Oaks 367 368 494 532 860 2,621
Unincorporated 159 160 225 250 468 1,262
COUNTYWIDE TOTAL 2,883 2,891 3,810 4,525 10,343 24,452
Source: SCAG, 2020
Per HCD direction, the extremely low-income and very low-income allocations are calculated as 50 percent each of the very low-income need RHNA allocation. This approach has been used to determine the extremely low - and very low -income numbers in Table D-1.
D.2 Housing Production Progress
HOUSING COMPLETED THROUGH FEBRUARY 28, 2022
Housing Element law and HCD Guidelines allow cities to count housing units receiving entitlements, building permits, or certificate of oc cupation towards meeting the RHNA allocation if the entitlements, building permits, or certificate of occupation are issued after June 30 , 2021. Table D-2 lists housing projects as of February 2022 that have received building permits after June 30, 2021 and are expected to be fully developed by October 15, 2029.
D. Projected Housing Needs
October 2022 Page D-3
Table D-2. Residential Units Approved, through February 28, 2022 Project Name
Extremely
Low/
Very Low
(EL/VL)
Low
(Low)
Moderate
(Mod)
Above
Moderate Total
Single Family, Detached, July – December
2021 0 0 0 2 2
Duplexes, July – December 2021 0 0 0 4 4
F Street Condominiums, July – December
2021 0 0 0 12 12
Wagon Wheel, Oxford Flats, Single Family
Attached, July – December 2021 0 0 0 24 24
Anacapa Townhomes, Single Family Attached,
July – December 2021 0 0 0 16 16
Accessory dwelling units, July – December
2021 4 6 15 0 25
Accessory dwelling units, January – February
2022 3 7 2 0 12
Wagon Wheel, Oxford Flats, Single Family
Attached, January – February 2022 0 0 0 12 12
TOTAL 7 13 17 70 107
Source: City of Oxnard February 2022 project list
Note 1: The accessory dwelling units are counted as affordable to very low and low income households based on the survey of ADUs for rent conducted by the City in 2020-2022.
Table D-3 presents the City’s total and remaining RHNA for the 2021–2029 RHNA cycle after subtracting units that have been approved (Table D -2). As of February 2022, the City’s total remaining RHNA need is 8,442 u nits in the four income categories.
Table D-3. Remaining RHNA as of February 28, 2022
Status Toward Goal Extremely/
Very Low1 Low Moderate Above
Moderate Total
RHNA Allocation (2014–2021) 1,840 1,071 1,538 4,100 8,549 Under Construction or Approved 7 13 17 70 107
Remaining 1,833 1,058 1,521 4,030 8,442
Source: SCAG 2021; City of Oxnard 2022
Oxnard Housing Element
Page D-4 October 2022
This page intentionally left blank
E
C ONSTRAINT S
October 2022 Page E-1
E.1 Land-Use Planning and Development Standards
State law requires the use of the term “constraints,” which generally implies forces or efforts to restrain actions that would otherwise occur. Environmental review, general plan s, zoning, and related local land use policies, regulations, and development standards are extensions of local government police powers to protect life and property, minimize nuisances, and achieve a desired quality of life as expressed through a participatory democratic process. Most local “constraints” are either required by state law (such as preparing and adopting a General Plan and conducting environmental review) or were enacted to remedy or prevent a specific local issue (such as requiring landscaping to deter graffiti). The term “constraint” should not be interpreted i n the context that local development standards and development review procedures are inhibiting the provision of quality affordable housing, which would otherwise be developed. Instead, t his section should be interpreted as a review of local land use planning, development standards, and development review procedures to ascertain whether a development standard or procedure or other regulation is no longer needed, has unintended and/or unnecessary negative consequences, and/or could be improved so as to increase opportunities and the feasibility of developing affordable housing (especially special needs and lower-income units), or any development. Periodic review and analysis of constraints in this context is welcome . The City maintains the current Zoning Code with zoning and development standards along with current fees on the City website.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page E-2 October 2022
TERMS
Density (net and gross). Density is calculated by taking the number of dwelling units in an area and dividing it by the acreage in the area. Gross density is calculated using the total acreage for the area. Net density is calculated by dividing units by the net acreage, generally, exclusive of areas needed for new or expanded public roadways required by the City’s general plan transportation element.
Family. A group of residents whose members jointly occupy a dwelling unit as a single housekeeping unit; have joint use of and responsibility for common areas; share household activities such as meals, chores, maintenance and expenses; but not including residents of commercial group living such as hotels, dormitories and fraternities.
Floor area ratio (FAR). A floor area ratio is often used to describe the intensity of commercial, office, and industrial land usage. The FAR is a ratio created by dividing the total gross square footage of the building by the net square footage of the lot. FAR is a macro-level tool used to estimate traffic generation and municipal service demand and is not intended to be used as a strict development standard..
Gross acreage. The total area of a development site expressed in acres, usually including the area to be devoted to streets.
High Segregation & Poverty. Areas in which at least 30 percent of the population earns an income below the federal poverty line and there is an overrepresentation of people of color relative to the county.
High Resource. Top 40 percent highest -scoring census tracts in the region.
Indicates residents in these census tracts have access to highly positive outcomes in terms of health, economic attainment, and education attainment.
Highest Resource. Top 20 percent highest -scoring census tracts in the region.
Indicates residents in these census tracts have access to the best outcomes in terms of health, economic attainment, and education attainment.
Lot coverage. The amount of a lot that is allowed to be covered by the footprint of structures on that lot.
Low Resource. Bottom 30 percent of remaining census tracts in the region.
Indicates residents in these census tracts could be experiencing a lack of access to positive environmental, economic, and education factors results in negative outcomes or perpetuated outcomes (such as perpetuated poverty).
Moderate Resource. Top 30 percent of remaining census tracts in the region.
Indicates residents in these census tracts have access to either somewhat positive outcomes in terms of health, economic attainment, and education; or positive outcomes in a certain area (e.g., score high for health, education) but not all areas (e.g., may score poorly for economic attainment).
E. Constraints
October 2022 Page E-3
Moderate Resource (Rapidly Changing). A filter applied to moderate resource tracts based on index scores just below the high resource threshold and experiencing rapid increases in key dimensions of opportunity (housing price, median income, job proximity, etc.).
Net acreage. the gross area less the area required for roadway or other dedication to public use.
Planned Development (PD). Land use zoning that allows the adoption of a set of development standards which are specific to a particular project. PD zones usually do not contain detailed development standards; those are established during the process of considering proposals and adopted upon project approval. Also known as a Planned Residential Group (PRG).
Zoning. Zoning is the division of a jurisdiction into districts (zones) within which permissible uses are prescribed and development standards are defined. Zoning is The principal tool for implementing the goals and policies of the general plan by translating land use categories and standards into regulations. Plans, Residential Zoning, and Development Standards
The land use definitions and policies for residential development are discussed in detail in the Oxnard 2030 General Plan and the Local Coastal Program (LCP), in combination with the City’s non-coastal and coastal zoning regulations (Oxnard City Code [OCC] Chapters 16 and 17, respectively). The general plan, LCP, and implementing zoning regulations combined establish the amount and distribution of land to be allocated for different housing types and densities. In October 2011, the City adopted the 2030 General Plan, with a planning horizon through 2030. The Oxnard LCP was initially adopted in 1982. The City set aside funding for a comprehensive update to the LCP in 2013 , applied for and received a state LCP planning grant, and r retained consultants in 2014. The LCP update is still in progress. Oxnard adopted a form -based Downtown Code in 2019 that provides flexible density and development standards for the Downtown area and established three new zoning districts (Downtown-Core, Downtown-Edge, Downtown-General) that replaced the Central Business district zone. In October 2021 the City adopted Affordable Housing Additive Zones ( -AHP and -AHD). The Additive Zones are a residential overlay zones that allow multifamily development on nonresidential zoned sites identified in Supplement 1 of the Housing Element at densities of up to 30 du/ac with the provision of 20% of units affordable to lower income households.
The Additive Zones have a specific set of objective standards to streamline the approval process for affordable projects and accommodate greater density, such as a higher height limit than the underlying zone. Oxnard voters adopted the Save Open Space and Agricultural Resources (SOAR) initiative in 1998 that is fully incorporated into the 2030 General Plan. SOAR and the 2020 General Plan generally require voter approval for the conversion of open space or agricultural land outside the SOAR-defined Oxnard City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB) to an urban use that would also require annexation into the City for extension of City utilities. The SOAR CURB generally follows City limits with two major exceptions:
the Teal Club Specific Plan area and the area between City limits and Olds and Arnold Roads near Ormond Beach. SOAR extends to the year 2050 and is not considered a development constraint by the City as SOAR fosters the continued Oxnard Housing Element
Page E-4 October 2022
agricultural use of State- designated prime agricultural land which is also a high State priority and the express will of Oxnard residents.
Each residential zone , and certain commercial zones allow ing residential development, has a residential density and development standards that regulate lot size, building height, setbacks, parking, etc. Table E-1 summarizes residential densities by zoning category and correlates them with the 2030 General Plan.
Table E-1 Residential Zoning and 2030 General Plan Compatibility Zoning District
(LCP = coastal zone only)
Minimum Lot
Area per
housing unit
(Square Feet)
Density Range
Units per Net
Acre (Zoning)
2030 General Plan Land
Use Designation
Dwelling Units
per Gross Acre
(2030 General
Plan)
Residential Designations
R-1 Single-Family
Residential 6,000 Up to 7 Low Density Up to 7
R-2 Multiple-Family
Residential 3,500 8–12 Low-Medium Density 7–12
R-3 Garden Apartment 2,400 13–18 Medium Density 12–18
R-4 High Rise Residential 1,500 19–30 Medium-High Density Residential 18–30
R-5 [Code amendment
required] 1,400 31+ High-Density Residential 30+
MH-PD Mobile Home Park 3,000 6.5 Mobile Home Planned
Development 1–12
R-B-1 Single-Family Beach
(LCP) 4,000 1–7 Very Low;
Low-Density
1–2
1–7
R-W-1 Single-Family Water-
Oriented (LCP) 4,0002 1–7 Very Low;
Low Density
1–2
1–7
R-W-2 Multiple-Family Water-
Oriented (LCP) 2,800 8–12 Low-Medium Density 7–12
R-2-C Coastal Low-Density
Multiple-Family (LCP) 3,500 8–12 Low-Medium Density 7–12 R-3-C Coastal Garden
Apartment (LCP) 2,4003 13–18 Medium Density 12–18
R-BF Beachfront Residential
(LCP) 2,5004 17 Low-Medium Density 7–12
MHP-C Mobile Home Park
(LCP) 3,000 1–12 Mobile Home Planned
Development 1–12
-AHP/-
AHD
Affordable Housing
Additive Zone na Up to 30 Affordable Housing
Additive Zone Up to 30
Commercial Designations that allow residential uses (dwelling units per net acre) C-1 Neighborhood
Shopping 3,630 1–12 Convenience Commercial 1–12
E. Constraints
October 2022 Page E-5
Zoning District
(LCP = coastal zone only)
Minimum Lot
Area per
housing unit
(Square Feet)
Density Range
Units per Net
Acre (Zoning)
2030 General Plan Land
Use Designation
Dwelling Units
per Gross Acre
(2030 General
Plan)
C2
C2-PD
C-M
General Commercial
Commercial and Light
Manufacturing
2,420 1–18
General, Community,
Regional, and
Neighborhood
Up to18
CNC Coastal Neighborhood
Commercial 0 0 Visitor Serving
Commercial 0
CO Commercial Office
(live/work only) N/A Established
by Use Permit Office Limited
DT-C Downtown Core 5,000 N/A1 Central Business District Up to 39 DT-G Downtown General 2,500 N/A1 Central Business District Up to 39 DT-E Downtown Edge 2,500 N/A1 Central Business District Up to 39 C-R Community Reserve 6,000 1 unit per lot Agriculture, Open Space, Resource Protection,
1 unit per lot
Industrial Designations that allow residential uses in live/work design ML Limited Manufacturing N/A 1 unit per lot Limited Manufacturing 1 unit per lot Source: City of Oxnard Zoning Code (Chapter 16 of City Municipal Code); City of Oxnard Coastal Zoning Code (Chapter 17 of City Municipal Code), accessed July 2020.
Notes:
1. Development in Downtown is not limited by density and/or floor area factors applied to individual parcels because the standards of the Oxnard Downtown Code implement the aggregate amount allowed by the General Plan through the intended physical character.
The maximum amount of new development within Downtown is as set forth in the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR).
2. Minimum lot area applies for lots that directly abut a waterway. Lots not directly abutting a waterway subject to a 6,000-square-foot minimum lot area.
3. Minimum lot area of 2,400 square feet per dwelling unit.
4. Oxnard Coastal Land Use Plan sets actual maximum allowed density based on then-existing Coastal zoning.
Similar to many California cities that had a growth “boom” after W orld War II, a relatively high proportion of the residential districts allow only single-family housing at up to seven units per acre (R-1 zoning). Many of the single-family housing tracts in Oxnard were approved with the Planned Development (“-PD”) designation, which allows flexibility with the development standards through a Special Use Permit or Planned Development Permit.
The Oxnard City Code allows live/work units in the Limited Manufacturing (ML) zone. These units are limited to efficiency units that may only be used by the on - site business.
Accessory Dwelling Units
The Oxnard City Code allows accessory dwelling units (ADUs) to be developed in zones R-1, R-1-PD, R-1-7-PD, R-10-PD, R-1-8-PD; R-2, R-2-PD; R-3, R-3-PD, and R-4. ADUs are allowed in the zones C -1, C-2, DT-E, DT-G, or DT-C if the lot is developed with only one legal primary dwelling unit/structure. ADUs, which were previously called second units or “granny flats,” allow increased residential density while providing minimal impact on the character of low -density neighborhoods.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page E-6 October 2022
These self-sufficient units are constructed on the property of a primary unit but are typically smaller in size. The OCC, Division 13, was revised most recently in 2020 to comply with State laws that generally allow ADUs “by right” through the building permit process.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The Zoning Code also serves to regulate the character and form of existing neighborhoods. The c ode sets forth residential development standards for each zoning district, as listed below and described in Table E-2.
Residential zoning designations in both the non-coastal and coastal areas are:
R-1 – Single-family residential R-W-1 – Single-family water- oriented
R-2 – Multiple-family residential R-W-2 – Multiple-family water- oriented
R-3 – Garden apartment R-2-C – Coastal low-density
multiple-family
R-4 – High-rise residential R-3-C – Coastal garden
apartment
MH-PD – Mobile home planned
development
R-BF – Beachfront residential
R-B-1 – Single-family residential MHP-C – Coastal mobile home park
Table E-2 Residential Development Standards by Zoning District Zoning
District Types of Housing Allowed
Density
- Units
Per
Acre
Yard Requirement in Feet Min.
Lot
Size
(sf)
Lot
Coverage/
FAR Front Side Rear Height
R-1 Single-family dwelling; accessory
buildings; off-street parking; grounds,
private greenhouses, and horticultural
collections, flower and vegetable
gardens and fruit trees; signs;
babysitting; manufactured housing;
traditional bed and breakfast; adult day
care facility serving 6 adults or less;
child care centers serving 6 children or
less; congregate living health facilities
with 6 beds or less; large family day
care homes; residential care facilities
for the elderly serving 6 persons or
less; ADUs; small residential health or
care facilities; storage; supportive
housing; short-term rentals
.
Conditional uses include churches;
swim clubs, tennis clubs, golf courses,
1–7 ≥20 3–5 ≤25 ≤25 6,00
0 n/a
E. Constraints
October 2022 Page E-7
Zoning
District Types of Housing Allowed
Density
- Units
Per
Acre
Yard Requirement in Feet Min.
Lot
Size
(sf)
Lot
Coverage/
FAR Front Side Rear Height
and similar uses; public utility
structures; townhouse condominiums;
and congregate living health facilities
with 7 to 15 beds.
R-2 All uses under R-1 except
manufactured and mobile homes, as
well as multifamily units.Conditional
uses include all conditional uses under
R-1; adult day care facilities serving up
to 15 adults, child care centers serving
up to 15 children; condominiums;
congregate living health facilities with
15 or more beds; convents serving up
to 15 persons; emergency shelters for
families; schools; public or private
parks and playgrounds; elderly
residential care facilities serving up to
15 adults; residential stock
cooperatives and community
apartments; and senior and/or senior
assisted living residential facilities.
8–12 ≥25 3–5 ≥25 ≤25 6,00
0 n/a
R-3 All uses under R-2; multifamily
dwellings and garden apartments;
accessory buildings; grounds, private
greenhouses, and horticultural
collections, flower and vegetable
gardens and fruit trees; off-street
parking; public parking; signs; storage;
and transitional housing. Conditional
uses include all conditional uses under
R-2; hospitals and convalescent
hospitals; private clubs, fraternities,
sororities, and lodges; adult day care
facilities serving more than 15 adults;
child care centers serving more than
15 children; congregate living health
facilities with more than 15 beds; and
bed and breakfast inn.
13–18 20 5–7.5 25 ≤35 2,40
0 n/a
R-4 All uses under R-3; high-rise or high-
density multifamily dwellings;
accessory buildings; off-street parking;
grounds, landscaping, flower, and
vegetable gardens and fruit trees;
signs; storage. Conditional uses
include all conditional uses under R-3.
19–30 15–20 5–10 5–10 ≤45 1,50
0 n/a
R-5 [R-5 was created in the 2030 General Plan but does not exist in the Zoning Code yet. No areas in the City have the R-5 designation]
MH-PD Residential mobile homes; common
recreation facilities and structures;
accessory uses; adult day care
facilities serving 6 adults or less; child
care centers serving 6 children or less;
1–6.5 ≥10 ≥10 ≥10 ≤35 3,00
0 75%
Oxnard Housing Element
Page E-8 October 2022
Zoning
District Types of Housing Allowed
Density
- Units
Per
Acre
Yard Requirement in Feet Min.
Lot
Size
(sf)
Lot
Coverage/
FAR Front Side Rear Height
congregate living health facilities with 6
beds or less; large family day care
homes; residential care facilities for the
elderly serving 6 persons or less;
farmworker housing; small residential
health or care facilities; and supportive
housing. Conditional uses include
office for mobile home space rental;
mobile home and mobile home
accessory sales; other mobile home
residential uses; and congregate living
health facilities with 15 beds or less.
R-B-11 Single-family dwelling2; accessory
buildings and structures; adult day
care facilities serving 6 adults or less;
home occupations; child care centers
serving 6 children or less; congregate
living health facilities with 6 beds or
less; large family day care homes;
residential care facilities for the elderly
serving 6 persons or less; small
residential health or care facilities;
short-term rentals. Conditional uses
include public utility and municipal
facilities and congregate living health
facilities with 7 to 15 beds.
1–7 10–20 5 15 ≤25 4,00
0 60%
R-W-11 Single-family dwelling placed on
permanent foundation, accessory
buildings and structures; adult day
care facilities serving 6 adults or less;
home occupations; child care centers
serving 6 children or less; congregate
living health facilities with 6 beds or
less; large family day care homes;
residential care facilities for the elderly
serving 6 persons or less; small
residential health or care facilities;
short-term rentals. Conditional uses
include congregate living health
facilities with 7 to 15 beds.
1–7 15–20 4–5 12–
20 ≤28 4,00
0 n/a
R-W-21 Single-family dwelling, accessory
buildings, and structures; adult day
care facilities serving 6 adults or less;
home occupations; child care centers
serving 6 children or less; congregate
living health facilities with 6 beds or
less; large family day care homes;
residential care facilities for the elderly
serving 6 persons or less; small
residential health or care facilities;
short-term rentals. Conditional uses
include townhouses, condominiums,
attached and semi-attached dwellings
8–12 15–20 0–5 12–
20 ≤30 2,80
0 n/a
E. Constraints
October 2022 Page E-9
Zoning
District Types of Housing Allowed
Density
- Units
Per
Acre
Yard Requirement in Feet Min.
Lot
Size
(sf)
Lot
Coverage/
FAR Front Side Rear Height
on a permanent foundation, and
congregate living health facilities with 7
to 15 beds.
R-2-C1 Single-family dwelling, accessory
buildings, and structures; adult day
care facilities serving 6 adults or less;
home occupations; child care centers
serving 6 children or less; congregate
living health facilities with 6 beds or
less; large family day care homes;
residential care facilities for the elderly
serving 6 persons or less; small
residential health or care facilities;
short-term rentals. Conditional uses
include duplex or multiple-family
dwelling; townhouses, condominiums,
and attached and semi-attached
dwellings; residential stock
cooperatives and community
apartments; adult day care facilities
serving 15 adults or less; child care
centers serving 15 children or less;
congregate living health facilities with 7
to 15 beds; and residential care
facilities for the elderly serving 15
persons or less.
8–12 20 5 25 ≤25 3,50
0 n/a
R-3-C1 Single-family dwelling on a permanent
foundation; accessory buildings and
structures; adult day care facilities
serving 6 adults or less; home
occupations; childcare centers serving
6 children or less; congregate living
health facilities with 6 beds or less;
large family day care homes;
residential care facilities for the elderly
serving 6 persons or less; small
residential health or care facilities;
short-term rentals. Conditional uses
include multiple-family dwelling;
townhouses, condominiums,
community ownership projects and
attached and semi-attached dwellings
on a permanent foundation; vacation
timeshare developments; adult day
care facilities serving 6 adults or less;
child care centers serving 6 children or
less; congregate living health facilities
with 6 beds or more; and residential
care facilities for the elderly serving
more than 6 persons.
13–18 15–20 5–10 25 ≤35 2,40
0 n/a
Oxnard Housing Element
Page E-10 October 2022
Zoning
District Types of Housing Allowed
Density
- Units
Per
Acre
Yard Requirement in Feet Min.
Lot
Size
(sf)
Lot
Coverage/
FAR Front Side Rear Height
MHP-
C1
Single-family mobile homes; common
recreation facilities and structures;
accessory structures; adult day care
facilities serving 6 adults or less; child
care centers serving 6 children or less;
congregate living health facilities with 6
beds or less; large family day care
homes; residential care facilities for the
elderly serving 6 persons or less; small
residential health or care facilities.
Conditional uses include common
recreation facilities, structures, and
accessory uses that would remove two
or more mobile home spaces; and
congregate living health facilities with 7
to 15 beds.
1–12 10 10 10 N/A 3,00
0 75%
R-BF1 Accessory buildings and structures;
adult daycare facilities serving 6 adults
or less; home occupations; childcare
centers serving 6 children or less;
congregate living health facilities with 6
beds or less; large family daycare
homes; residential care facilities for the
elderly serving 6 persons or less; small
residential health or care facilities;
short-term rentals. Conditional uses
include single-family dwelling; duplex
or multiple-family dwelling; public utility
and municipal facilities; adult daycare
facilities serving 15 adults or less;
childcare centers serving 15 children
or less; congregate living health
facilities with more than 6 beds; and
residential care facilities for the elderly
serving 15 persons or less.
13–17 0 5 15–
20 ≤30 n/a n/a
-AHP/-
AHD
Multifamily residential with a min 20%
of units affordable to lower income,
ADUs, Uses allowed in underlying
zoning
30 units
per
acre
20 ft in
C2,
30 ft in
BRP
5 ft
for 1-
2 story,
7.5 ft
for 3
story,
10 ft
for 4+
story
in C2
30 ft
street
side
in
BRP
5 ft
for 1-
2 story,
7.5 ft
for 3
story,
10 ft
for 4+
story
in C2
N/A in
BRP
56 Und
erlyi
ng
Zon
e
n/a
E. Constraints
October 2022 Page E-11
Lot coverage is indicated for each district in Table E-2. Many districts don’t have a maximum lot coverage or FAR. Those that do have large enough lot coverages to allow for maximum residential densities in that zone.
Allowed Height
Allowed height in residential zones is generally limited to two stories in the R-1, R- 2, and MHP zones. All other residential zones have a height limit of six stories established by the 2030 General Plan, Section 3.5, when it was adopted in 2011 and which states:
“All new structures and/or remodels are limited to six stories except in areas designated as Low Density Residential, Low Medium Density Residential, Mobile Home Park, Airport Compatible, and areas subject to the Ventura County Harbor Public Works Plan which are limited by their respective development standards. All entitlements that exceed six stories as of the adoption of the 2030 General Plan are exempt from the Height Overlay District unless they propose project modifications that create new development more than six stories, as defined by Chapter 16 of the City Code. Development located within the Height Overlay District may be permitted to exceed six stories by application and/or as part of an Urban Village specific plan.
Exceeding six stories includes an impact fee and/or equivalent mitigation as required by the City Council. The granting of additional stories may require environmental review that includes shade and shadow and local wind impact analyses.” (General Plan Policies, pg. 3-18).
The General Plan height overlay does not apply in the Coastal Zone.
All commercial zones also allow housing as the only use or as part of a mixed use project except the C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, and BRP, Business Research Park. The industrial zones allow a caretaker residence and/or work/live housing only in the Limited and Light Industrial zones.
Lot Size and Density
Lot size standards establish a minimum lot area through width and depth dimensions, and access to streets and utilities for orderly development of residential property. Density in a residential area is influenced by building height limits and the lot area per housing units requirements. In Oxnard, lot size and height are well calibrated across all residential zones , such that one is not significantly more restrictive than the other. Setbacks are largely for fire safety and deference is given to the Oxnard Fire Dep artment regarding the possibility to reduce setback distances. The City has not received any requests or proposals for residential projects at below identified densities for sites in the existing Housing Element sites inventory. The City has not received any requests t o develop at lower densities during the 5th cycle.
Setback Requirements
Setback requirements define the minimum horizontal distance between the face of a structure and its lot line(s). Setbacks were initially developed to inhibit the ability of a fire to spread from building to building. They are still considered necessary to Oxnard Housing Element
Page E-12 October 2022
provide firefighting access between structures. Front yard setbacks are used to create a streetscape desired by the community. Similar to allowed heights, the effect of setback requirements is to define the massing and size of the development envelope rather than the number of units, even though these elements are intimately related.
Using the R-3 (Garden Apartment) zone as an example, typical (slightly flexible) setback requirements would yield a structure that is set back 20 feet from the front property line, 5 feet from each side property line, and 25 feet from the rear property line. As an example, a quarter-acre parcel (totaling 10,890 square feet) would allow a building with a maximum footprint totaling 5,546 square feet, covering just over half the area of the property. Given that this hypothetical project could extend to a maximum of 35 feet in height, as established earlier, the total square footage of the project could conceivably reach 16,638 square feet (three floors) , which would accommodate 12 units (four units per floor at approximately 1,300 square feet each). This size project would fit within the density ranges allowed in the designation.
Setbacks do not seem to be a limiting factor impacting allowed density, housing supply, or affordability. This holds true across the R-1 through R-4 residential zones.
It is important to note that setback requirements in each zoning district are constant regardless of the size of the parcel, so they impact development on smaller parcels to a greater degree than development on larger lots . Narrow parcels that could normally accommodate development may not, after applying setback requirements, be feasible for housing if the resulting buildable portion of the lot is too narrow or awkward for efficient construction or functionality. The zoning variance is a standard City procedure available to consider parcels with unusual shape or other constraining attributes.
Open Space and Interior Yard Space Requirements
Oxnard maintains minimum open space requirements fo r all residential development. Open space is an essential quality of life element in the city where its moderate coastal climate does not typically include air conditioning in most housing units. The interior yard open space requirements range from 15 percent of the lot area in the R -1 zone up to 30 percent in the R -4 zone. Open space and yard requirements affect site design and the layout of structures on the property.
Achieving the City’s desired open space provisions is usually accommodated through minor project redesign and seldom prevents a development from gaining City approval. Similar to the development standards previously identified in this section, open space and interior yard space requirements play only a par tial and somewhat overlapping role in residential development in Oxnard. T he amount of interior yard space or open space required in a residential development is expressed in terms of a percentage of the total lot area. Even if the area is achieved, it also must meet minimum dimension criteria in order to make it usable. Therefore, the total amount of required open space varies, depending on the size of the lot, but the minimum dimensions of the open space remain fixed. As a result, smaller lot developments or narrow lot developments are disproportionately burdened by Oxnard’s open space requirements because they must maintain the same percentage of open space as larger lot developments, but are more likely to have a E. Constraints
October 2022 Page E-13
higher percentage of their lots set aside because the project fails to provide qualified interior yard space. This condition exists because small, narrow, or elongated lots are more likely to exhibit setbacks along portions of property line(s) that are less than 10 feet in width, compared with lots that are larger or more regular in shape.
While it is understandable that Oxnard mandates minimum dimensions for open areas so that they are usable, such a requirement may constrain development on irregular lots. The City encourages applicants to assemble narrow lots into larger parcels.
NONRESIDENTIAL ZONING OPTIONS
The majority of housing opportunities in Oxnard are governed by its residential zoning districts. There is considerable opportunity for residential growth in the commercial and industrial zoning districts and in the Downtown Zones: Downtown Core (DT-C), Downtown General (DT-G), and Downtown Edge (DT-E). Table E-3 summarizes these opportunities by nonresidential zoning district. Oxnard will need to take into consideration the requirements of California’s Housing Accountability Act (California Government Code Section 65589.5) when considering applications for the districts listed in Table E-3. Lot coverage is indicated for each district in Table E-3. Many districts don’t have a maximum lot coverage or FAR. Those that do have maximum lot coverage or FAR have large enough lot coverages to allow for maximum residential densities in that zone. In addition, in October 2021 multiple properties in zones in Table E -3 had an Affordable Housing overlay zone applied that allows 30 du/ac and objective development standards for affordable housing .
Table E-3 Allowances for Housing in Oxnard’s Nonresidential Zoning Districts Zoning District Type of Housing Allowed
Density
- Units
per
Acre
Yard Requirement in Feet Min. Lot
Size (sf)
Lot
Coverage/
FAR
Front Side Rear Height
C-1:
Neighborhood
Commercial
Children’s day care
facility serving more than
15 children, adult day
care facility, and ADU
require a Special Use
Permit (SUP).
1–12 20 ft 10 ft 15 ft 20 ft 21,780 35%
C-2: General
Commercial
Townhouse,
condominium. ADUs
require a SUP.
1–18 10 ft 5 ft 0–15 ft 35 ft N/A 35%
C-O:
Commercial
Office
Small child day care.
Residential care facility,
adult day care,
senior/senior assisted
living residential facility,
short-term rentals, and
ADUs require a SUP.
1-18 10 ft 5 ft 5 ft 15 ft 2,400 60%
Oxnard Housing Element
Page E-14 October 2022
Zoning District Type of Housing Allowed
Density
- Units
per
Acre
Yard Requirement in Feet Min. Lot
Size (sf)
Lot
Coverage/
FAR
Front Side Rear Height
DT-C: Downtown
Core
Multifamily unit, live/work
housing, home-based
business, ADUs,
residential care facility
requires a SUP
391 5 ft 7–10
ft 5–10 ft
120 ft
+ 30 ft
with
Dev.
Agmt.
5,000 n/a
DT-G:
Downtown
General
Multifamily unit, live/work
housing, home-based
business, ADUs,
residential care facility
requires a SUP
391 10–15
ft
7–15
ft 5–15 ft
85 ft +
21 ft
with
Dev.
Agmt.
2,500 n/a
DT-E: Downtown
Edge
All residential uses;
residential care facility
requires a SUP.
391 10–15
ft
10–15
ft 15–18 ft
35 ft
+ 9 ft
with
SUP
2,500 n/a
M-L: Limited
Manufacturing
Live/work housing
w/1 active bus.
License/Unit, emergency
shelter, farmworker
housing
1 unit
per
work
facility
20 ft
50 ft,
bldg
height
50 ft,
building
height
55 15,000 45%
BRP: Business
Research Park
Assisted living with an
SUP N/A 30 ft
30 ft
street
side
N/A 35 15,000 60%
CM: Commercial
Manufacturing
Live/work housing
w/1 active bus.
License/Unit; emergency
shelter, transitional &
supportive housing and
farmworker housing with
an SUP
1 unit
per
work
facility
0-40 ft
10 ft,
bldg
height
20 ft 35 20,000 35%
M-1: Light
Manufacturing
Live/work housing
w/1 active bus.
License/Unit; farmworker
housing
1 unit
per
work
facility
10-30
ft
0-30 ft
street
side
bldg.
height 55 15,000 45%
M-2: Heavy
Manufacturing
Live/work housing
w/1 active bus.
License/Unit; farmworker
housing
1 unit
per
work
facility
0-30 ft 0 - 5 ft 0-20 ft 100 15,000 45%
C-R: Community
Reserve Zone
Small child care, small
congregate living health
facilities, large family day
care, small residential
care, and farmworker
employee housing.
Single-family residential
(SFR), temporary mobile
homes, larger
congregate living health
facilities, and farmworker
housing requires a SUP.
1 unit
per lot
25%
of
parcel
depth
10%
of
parcel
width
25% of
parcel
depth
25 6,000 n/a
E. Constraints
October 2022 Page E-15
Zoning District Type of Housing Allowed
Density
- Units
per
Acre
Yard Requirement in Feet Min. Lot
Size (sf)
Lot
Coverage/
FAR
Front Side Rear Height
-AHP/-AHP:
Affordable
Housing Additive
Zone
Multifamily residential
with a min 20% of units
affordable to lower
income, ADUs, Uses
allowed in underlying
zoning
30 units
per
acre
20 ft
in C2,
30 ft
in
BRP
5 ft for
1-2
story,
7.5 ft
for 3
story,
10 ft
for 4+
story
in C2
30 ft
street
side in
BRP
5 ft for
1-2
story,
7.5 ft for
3 story,
10 ft for
4+ story
in C2
N/A in
BRP
56 Underlying
Zone n/a
Development in Downtown is not limited by density and/or floor area factors applied to individual parcels because the standards of the Oxnard Downtown Code implement the aggregate amount allowed by the General Plan through the intended physical character. The maximum amount of new development within Downtown is as set forth in the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). However, maximum residential density allowed under the General Plan in this area is 39 du/ac.
Of the seven districts listed above, the three Downtown Zones comprise about 128 acres and present the largest opportunity for housing development because they allow a variety of housing types and densities that exceed those allowed in the R-4 (High-Rise Residential) zone. The Downtown Zones also cover a fairly large amount of land relative to the R-4 zone and therefore could eventually provide for the construction of a relatively large number of housing units. The allowance of a mix of land uses within the same building allows greater project flexibility to developers, which could make the provision of housing in downtown feasible across a wider variety of market conditions.
The Downtown Zones streamline permitting for development with clear form-based standards to promote high -quality development and reduced parking standards through the utilization of centralized public parking facilities and an in -lieu fee program. The Downtown Core (DT-C) zone, Downtown General (DT-G) zone, and Downtown Edge (DT-E) zone all maintain flexible setback requirements and height bonuses with development agreements or Special Use Permits. In the DT-E zone, all residential uses are permitted. In the DT -C and DT -G zones, multifamily residential uses, live/work units, and home businesses are permitted.
The C-2 zone covers 563 acres, located mainly along arterials and in several large shopping centers. The C-2 zoning district allows an all-housing development at the same density as the R-3 district (13–18 dwelling units per acre) and standards. A Special Use Permit is appropriate in C-2 because housing in the C -2 zone needs review as not all C-2 parcels are appropriate for residential uses.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page E-16 October 2022
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
The City tries to balance real parking needs and avoid unnecessary parking requirements. Parking requirement s vary by residential type, lot size, and the particular short -term vehicle storage needs associated with different types of development, as shown in Table E-4. On-site, well-designed parking is an important aspect of quality of life and property valuation in Oxnard . Several older neighborhoods experience parking shortages because older residential units do not have adequate space for off-street parking. This issue has been repeatedly raised by the public at City Council meetings. Additionally, State legislation overrides local residential parking requirements. Multifamily projects receive further parking reductions (no visitor spaces required) with a state density bonus, which is applicable to most multifamily development as they are subject to the City's inclusionary housing requir ement of providing 10 percent lower income units.
Oftentimes in these areas, the problem of parking is also an issue of multiple families living in one single- family unit or in the garage. When homes become overcrowded, as is prevalent in Oxnard, parking may be impacted. According to the 2018 American Community Survey (ACS), approximately 18 percent of households in Oxnard were considered overcrowded, with more than one person per room.
The 2013 Latinos Unidos v. Napa County First Appellate District ruling and subsequent California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) opinion letter requires counting of affordable units under a local inclusionary ordinance to also count toward qualifying for the state density bonus (Government Code Section 65915 et seq.). This ruling supersedes City parking requirements, as any project over 10 units is subject to the City’s 10 percent inclusionary requirement, which then automatically earns a 20-percent State density bonus, reduced parking requirements per State density bonus law , and entitlement to one or more development standard concessions . This is the situation with nearly every multifamily project in the City. The City revised the City’s density bonus regulations via Ordinance 2912 in 2016 to account for this unexpected reduction in parking that would likely impact neighborhoods with guest parking if a project were built with only State-required parking. To date, the developers of all residential projects have included some guest parking or other parking alternatives in recognition of the need by their residents . Based on the above, the garage requirements for multifamily housing included in Table E-4 are not a constraint to multifamily development in the City.
E. Constraints
October 2022 Page E-17
Table E-4. R esidential Off-Street Parking Requirements Uses
Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirements
Citywide DT-C DT-G DT-E
Detached single-family units
Detached
single-family
units on
separate
lots
Two garage spaces for up to five bedrooms; three garage spaces for six bedrooms; four garage spaces for seven bedrooms; five garage spaces for eight or more bedrooms
1 space per unit for studios and
1-bedrooms
3; 2 spaces per unit
with 2 or more bedrooms.4
Detached
single-family
dwelling
with
Accessory
Dwelling
Unit
1 Same as above, plus a number of off-street parking spaces equal to one or the number of bedrooms in the accessory dwelling unit (ADU), whichever is less, for each ADU. Off-street parking is not required for ADU located within ½ mile of public transit, within a historic district, within 1 block of a car share vehicle, or on a street where a parking permit is required by the City but not offered to the ADU occupant; or the ADU is type 2A, 2B or 4.
Parking spaces for the ADU may be uncovered. Requirements for ADU parking are in Municipal Code Sections 16-468 and 16- 622. Per OCC 16-468, ADU parking is not required for the majority of locations in the City. The City will update ADU code (16-468(D) and 16-622) to recognize current State law that no replacement parking spaces are required if using the garage for an ADU.
Townhouse Two garage spaces
Apartments2
Studio and
one
bedroom
One garage space per unit
1 space per unit
3; 0.5
spaces per unit or
1.65 spaces per unit
max.
4 1 space
per unit
3;
1.65 spaces
per unit.
4 Two or more
bedrooms Two garage spaces per unit
2 spaces per unit3;
0.5 spaces per unit or
1.65 spaces per unit
max.
4 2 spaces
per unit
3;
1.65 spaces
per unit.
4 Visitor
spaces
One visitor space per unit, which need not be covered for the first 30 units; after the 31st unit. 0.5 visitor space per unit is required. N/A 5 Multifamily cluster development, including units with at least one common wall such as condominium, stock cooperative, or townhouse condominium developments on lots less than 6,000 square feet Studio or
one
bedroom
One garage space per unit
1 space per unit
3; 0.5
spaces per unit or
1.65 spaces per unit
max.
4 1 space
per unit
3;
1.65 spaces
per unit.
4 Two or more
bedrooms Two garage spaces per unit
2 spaces per unit
3;
0.5 spaces per unit or
1.65 spaces per unit
max.
4 2 spaces
per unit
3;
1.65 spaces
per unit.
4 Oxnard Housing Element
Page E-18 October 2022
Uses
Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirements
Citywide DT-C DT-G DT-E
Visitor
requirement
One visitor space per unit, which need not be covered for the first 30 units; after the 31st unit, 0.5 space per unit is required N/A Mobile home park
Mobile
home space
Two off-street spaces per mobile home space; one space shall be covered
N/A
Visitor
parking
One space for every five mobile home pads; visitor parking must be in centralized bays located no further than 150 feet from mobile homes being served
Community
recreation
facilities
One space for every 15 mobile homes
Recreational
vehicle
parking
Centralized areas for recreational vehicles provided at ratio of one storage space for each four mobile home spaces
Source: City of Oxnard Zoning Code (Chapter 16 of City Municipal Code), accessed July 2020; City of Oxnard 2019 Downtown Code, accessed February 2021.
1. To the extent required by Government Code Section 65852 et. seq., as it may be amended from time to time, accessory dwelling units do not require additional parking for the ADU when located within one-half mile of public transit, located within a city-recognized historic district, constructed within legally existing primary residence or a legally existing accessory structure, when on-street parking permits are required but not offered to the ADU occupant, or when there is a car share vehicle located within one block.
2. Garage for an ADU may not be in an arrangement with garage for primary residential unit. All required garages shall be assigned to a specific unit. Covered spaces are not permitted. All visitor spaces shall be striped “Visitors Only.” Developments having three units or less may count driveway parking as required visitor spaces. Developments having four or more units may count driveway parking as required visitor spaces provided not more than 50% of the required visitor spaces are provided in this manner and all units counting driveway parking have individual driveways.
3. When private garages are provided.
4. When a shared parking/open structure is provided.
5. When the inclusionary regulations apply, as is the case on nearly all multifamily projects, visitor parking is waived altogether.
Only two (garage) spaces are presently required for single-family units up to five bedrooms, which are the majority of single-family units . One additional garage space is required at seven bedrooms, and another space for eight or more bedrooms. In the case of apartments, only a single space is required, unless there are two or more bedrooms in the unit, in which case two are required. Only one visitor space is required for the first 30 units in a multifamily project . When the inclusionary regulations apply , as is the case on nearly all multifamily projects, visitor parking is waived altogether, upon request of the developer. Adequate and appropriate on-site garage parking is a necessity that prevents impacts on public streets and neighborhoods and provides secure parking for vehicles.
Oxnard has an average of four persons per hous ehold (ACS 2017), and over half (53 percent) of four-or-more person households have at least three cars or more .
Many neighborhoods are parking impacted. Parking requirements can be a constraint, as additional parking spaces may be required in order to add more rooms or an ADU to the property. Every room that could be considered a bedroom is counted when determining the number of parking spaces required for a housing unit, even if the room is used as a den or office. However, several neighborhoods have requested permit parking because some occupants have more than the average number of vehicles and/or do n ot park in their garages and/or have E. Constraints
October 2022 Page E-19
recreational vehicles (RVs) and boats in their driveways. Enforcement of parking requirements does not necessarily constrain the production of additional rooms that could help reduce overcrowding. The City currently allows common garage parking as well as tandem parking to provide flexibility in parking requirements.
The City has an administrative relief procedure that is often approved to request reduced parking under certain circumstances (such as retirement housing, senior housing, and affordable housing) and the City’s density bonus ordinance is in compliance with state law to allow a lower parking requirement for projects that qualify for the density bonus. Most multifamily projects in the City are automatically eligible for parking reductions (no visitor parking) under State Density Bonus law as they are subject to the City's inclusionary housing requirement of providing 10 percent lower income units . OCC Section 16 -466 also allows reduced parking requirements for senior and senior assisted living residential facilities with approval of a parking study that demonstrates sufficient parking as well as shared parking when uses with different peaking characteristics (such as offices and apartments) are combined in a single structure. Program 27 also proposes to update the parking requirements in OCC Section 16-622 to move parking requirements for the elderly – residential care facilities, independent living, memory care – under residential uses (OCC 16-622 currently lists parking for assisted living and nursing homes under health services). Currently, assisted living requires one space for every two units plus one shuttle van parking space. Nursing Homes require one space per three beds for nursing and convalescent homes which do not contain separate living quarters containing individual kitchens, plus one space for every two employees required on largest shift. Over the past five years, the City monitored the impacts of these parking studies for any constraints on the development of housing affordable to lower-income households. In addition, the new Downtown Code, approved in 2019, has reduced parking requirements for residential uses in the downtown and reductions for studio and one-bedroom apartments, as a result of a review of city parking requirements. The reduced requirements for the Downtown include The Downtown Parking In- Lieu fee program which facilitates designation of parking spaces to serve residential projects in Downtown in city parking garages rather than requiring parking onsite for each project.
In addition to these flexible ways the City addresses parking requirements , the current Housing Element includes Program 28 that evaluates the current parking requirements and explores alternative options to ensure parking requirements do not pose an undue constraint on the development of housing affordable to lower - income households. This program will be amended and continued.
SPECIFIC PLANS
Seven residential or mixed-use specific plans adopted since 1980 account for most residential development over the past 40 years. The Northwest Community and Northwest Golf Course specific plans are traditional single -family detached subdivisions. The Seabridge, Mandalay Phase IV, The Village, Riverpark, Las Cortes, and Northeast Community specific plans enable a wide range of single- and multifamily housing at various densities and varied development standards. The specific plan process is available for medium and larger projects and allows flexibility in density and development standards to well-designed projects.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page E-20 October 2022
E.2 2030 General Plan
Oxnard’s existing land use patterns reflect the city’s unique coastal location and agricultural history. Wit h the exception of several high- rise buildings in north Oxnard, the city is characterized by one- or two-story buildings, low- and medium- density residential, and a large industrial area surrounded by agricultural land, the Pacific Ocean and Santa C lara River. M ost of the c ity’s higher -intensity development lies along primary thoroughfares such as Oxnard Boulevard, Highway 101, Saviers Road, and Gonzales Road.
The adopted 2030 General Plan proposes development in three general ways:
(1) completion of development patterns envisioned by the 2020 General Plan and within the CURB, ( 2) redevelopment within the CURB with an “u rban village” concept, and (3) incorporation of the Ormond Beach Wetlands Restoration Plan.
The urban villages would incorporate private redevelop ment, mixed land uses, affordable and workforce housing, and transit connectivity and are intended to be a key strategy for meeting greenhouse gas emissions-reduction targets.
E.3 Fees and Exactions
Development fees and exactions are either required or enabled by state law so that development is orderly and infrastructure, utilities, and services are available for new residents. Since 1978, when California voters approved Proposition 13, local governments have had to rely on fees and exactions to provide mandated infrastructure, utilities, and services to accommodate the constrained local tax base.
These improvements and services, while required, are not funded by the State.
Fees and exactions are an expected component of development along with land, construction materials, and labor costs.
Fees, land dedications, and other exactions are charged directly to the developer and are passed on to the ultimate end user in the form of higher pri ces and rents unless there is a source of subsidy funding, such as federal or state funding.
Table E-5 displays the most common fees associated with residential development in Oxnard by housing type. In the case of applications, special use permits, planned development permits, variances, maps, zone boundary changes, or changes of zone classification, fees are due at the time of application submittal. In the case of most permits, they are flat fees, but they can require supplemental amounts if it is determined that unusual conditions trigger special study and evaluation . These amounts are based on cost estimates provided by the City and require deposit before work begins so that they may be billed against the project as the special study process moves forward. Oxnard also charges impact fees, the most common of which are also listed in Table E-5. Capital fees and exactions are designed to reimburse the costs of public utilities and services provided in the City to serve that project. Exactions, such as land easements for infrastructure, can be required on a case-by-case basis, but all developments are required to pay their associated infrastructure-related fees. Infill developments are located in areas with established infrastructure with available capacity and generally have lower fees.
E. Constraints
October 2022 Page E-21
Table E-5 Planning and Development Fees, 2020
Fee Category Single-Family Multifamily
Planning and Application Fees
Pre-Application $3,785.25 + $740.25 $3,787.25+$740.25
Development Design Review $1,674.75 $6,615.00
Special Use Permit $8,400.00 $8,400.00
Home Occupation Permit $84.00 $84.00
CBD Design Review – Major $2,257.50 $2,257.50
CBD Design Review – Minor $782.25 $782.25
Development Agreement $10,500.00 $10,500.00
Mobile Home Review $976.50 $976.50
Planned Development Permit $8,400.00 $8,400.00
Subdivision
Final Map $1,254.75+$7,000.00
Lot Line Adjustment $1,333.50+$3,000.00 $1,333.50+$3,000.00 Lot Merger $1,333.50+$3,000.00 $1,333.50+$3,000.00
Parcel Map $4,005.75+$3,000.00 $4,005.75+$3,000.00
Tentative Map $8,400+$1,848.00 $8,400+$1,848.00
Environmental Fees
CEQA Exempt Project $152.25 $152.25
Initial Study/Negative Declaration $5,481.00 $5,481.00
Mitigated Negative Declaration & Monitoring $10,500.00 $10,500.00 Fire Prevention EIR Review $808.50 $808.50
Impact Fees
Sewer Connection Fee $5,256.00 $3,822.55 per unit
Water System Connection Fee $3,133.00 $3,133 per unit
Storm Drain Fee $2,657.88 $1,624.28 per unit
Traffic Impact Fee $9,769.00 $7,574.00 per unit
Growth Requirement Capital Fee $5,981.00 $3,955.00 per unit Park Development Fee $6,993.00 $4,624.00 per unit
Mobility Fee $3,396.00 $2,245.00 per unit
Underground Utility Fee $0.1726 per square foot1 $0.1726 per square foot1 Public Art Fee $672.00 $280.00 per unit
Downtown Parking In-Lieu Fee To be determined2 To be determined2 Sources: City of Oxnard Planning Permit & Fee Schedule effective September 2018, City of Oxnard Development Impact Fee and Affordable Housing Resolutions adopted May 2020, and City of Oxnard Development Services Department Fee Charges Schedule effective September 24, 2018. Certain Fees are changed annually based on CPI.
Notes:
1. In the Oxnard Shores Area, the cost is $1.1476 per square foot, plus baseline citywide fee.
2. The City is preparing the Downtown Parking In-Lieu Fee Nexus Study, pursuant to the City’s Downtown strategy. This fee will be presented to City Council once the study is complete with appropriate amendments to the Downtown Code.
Oxnard Housing Element
Page E-22 October 2022
Residential projects are required to pay a Growth Requirement Capital Fee of $5,981.00 per single- family unit and $3,955.00 per multifamily unit. The City established this fee upon the determination that development within its boundaries creates a need for additional public facilities and capital improvements. This fee is not directly tied to a specific infrastructure project related to a given new development (such as a new street), and was consequently challenged in court in 1990. It was determined, however, that a reasonable nexus exists between the fees charged and the needs created by new development, as required by the California Mitigation Fee Act. This fee was revised upon findings from the 2020 Development Impact Fee Nexus Study to ensure the City is able to continue to provide the existing level of service (LOS) as the service population grows.
Based on fees associated with a typical single -family and multifamily residential unit, typical fees of $ 44,469 for a single-family unit and $38,760 for a multifamily unit have been calculated using the costs in Table E-5. Table E-6 illustrates the total fee and exaction costs of a typical new single- family house and a multifamily development relative to their total costs. School fees have also been added to the totals in Table E-6. As discussed in detail in the Land Costs section, the land cost survey calculated the average cost per acre of all residential parcels for sale surveyed in December 2020 to be $5,477,705. The City estimated that 10 single- family units would be permitted via small lot subdivision on one acre of vacant residential land. Therefore, a land cost of $547,770 has been added to the typical cost of development of a new single -family unit (at 10 units per acre) . For multi - family development, 20 units were assumed for a project on one acre of vacant residential land. Therefore, a land cost of $273,890 has been added to the typical cost of development for a new multifamily unit in Table E -6 (at 20 units per acre).
The proportion of total housing costs attributed to fees and exactions is estimated at 7.5 percent for new single-family units and 14.6 percent for new multifamily units.
Multifamily developments generally have a higher Quimby Act fee unless the projects provide public park space. As the total fees are relatively the same, the proportion differs due to the higher total development cost per single-family unit.
Tax-credit financing and other sources of affordable housing financing cover fees, so fees are not passed on to the buyer or renter in projects receiving that financing.
If fees are a constraint on a particular project, the City Council has the ability now to remove, lower, or delay fees on a case- by-case basis, and has done so in the past.
E. Constraints
October 2022 Page E-23
Table E-6. Development Costs
Development Cost for a Typical Unit New Single-Family1 New Multifamily2 Typical fees per unit (total) $44,469 $38,760
Typical estimated cost of development per unit $708.035 $502,860 Estimated proportion of fees to total development cost 5.9% 7.2% Source: City of Oxnard Planning Permit & Fee Schedule effective September 2018; Trulia.com, 2020; City of Oxnard Affordable Housing In- Lieu Fee Nexus Study, 2020.
1. Assumes a CEQA-exempt, three-bedroom single-family home of 1,500 square feet with cost of land included.
2. Assumes a CEQA-exempt, two-bedroom multi-family home of 1,200 square feet with cost of land included.
E.4 Provisions for a Variety of Housing Types
PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (SB 520)
California law requires an analysis of potential constraints to the development, maintenance, and improvement of housing for persons with disabilities. California Government Code Section 65008 requires that cities and counties analyze the potential and act ual constraints on housing for persons with disabilities, demonstrate efforts to remove any existing or potential governmental constraints, and include programs in their Housing Elements to accommodate housing designed for persons with disabilities. This analysis evaluates the City’s Zo ning Code, permitting procedures, development standards, and building code to determine whether they would result in any possible barriers to either construction of housing or retrofitting of existing housing to accommodate the special needs of disabled persons.
Zoning and Land-Use Policies
The Oxnard Zoning Code is conscious of fair housing law and the housing needs of the disabled. It contains provisions designed to accommodate the development of housing for residents with physical and/or mental challenges. Program 6 in Chapter G proposes to remove a finding that is part of the City’s Reasonable Accommodation approval process for consistency with state law.
All non-Coastal Zone residential land use districts allow congregate living health facilities serving six or fewer adults by right, including the MH -PD Mobile Home Planned Development zone. Additionally, congregate care facilities serving six or fewer adults are allowable by right in all Coastal Zone districts that allow residential uses (R-B-1, R-W-1, R-W-2, R-2-C, R-3-C, and MHP-C). In addition, congregate care facilities serving 7 to 15 adults are conditionally allowed with an SUP in all residential zones in the City. An SUP requires a hearing in front of the Planning Commission and is not a ministerial permit. More details about the SUP process are provided in Section E.5 below.
Congregate living facilities are defined in Oxnard’s Zoning Code as “State-licensed residential homes with a non-institutional home-like environment that provides 24- hour medical supervision and skilled nursing with services for persons who are physically disabled...or are catastrophically and severely disabled...” Therefore, provisions for these facilities in the code further the goals of Executive Order 13217, Oxnard Housing Element
Page E-24 October 2022
which encourages community -based alternatives for individuals with disabilities.