PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF OXNARD AND CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC.
By This Professional Services Agreement (“Agreement”), the City of Oxnard (“City”) agrees to engage the Services of Carollo Engineers, Inc. (“Consultant”), and Consultant agrees to perform the Services for City as herein described, for the compensation, during the term, and otherwise subject to the covenants and conditions herein set forth.
City and Consultant may be individually referred to as “Party” or collectively as the “Parties.”
1. [INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]
2. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES.
This agreement is for the development of a detailed and comprehensive Biosolids Master Plan that will be used as a roadmap for future improvements for the Oxnard Water Resource Recovery Facility. The plan shall evaluate current biosolids and digester gas management practices, identify and assess alternatives for the treatment, utilization and disposal of biosolids and digester gas, develop recommendations for short-term and long-term strategies, provide financial analysis for each alternative including capital, operational and life cycle costs, and ensure compliance with all relevant local, state and federal regulations.
3. PARTIES.
City of Oxnard, a general law and municipal corporation of the State of California, located at 300 West Third Street, Oxnard, California 93030.
Carollo Engineers, Inc. a corporation of the State of Delaware, located at 2795 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, California 94598
4. TERM OF AGREEMENT: From: May 6, 2025 To: May 5, 2026 A. Time is of the essence in this Agreement
B. The City shall have the option to exercise (1) consecutive (1) one-year term extensions, in accordance with the scope of work and terms and conditions of this Agreement. Any price negotiations, if allowed, shall be negotiated at the time of contract extension.
C. This Agreement shall not exceed a total of five (5) years (including the initial term and any options to extend). The City in its sole discretion may exercise the option terms upon sixty (60) days written notice to the 258
Agreement No. 32500458
Consultant (or any other time if the parties so agree) in accordance with Section 12 of this Agreement. The option term shall be commenced by an amendment to this agreement.
D. All Services required of Consultant under this Agreement shall be completed on or before the end of the term of the Agreement.
5. AGREEMENT AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED: $423,422.00
6. AGREEMENT EXHIBITS. The following documents memorialized below are the only exhibits to this Agreement and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of a conflict between the Exhibits and this Agreement, the Agreement controls.
Exhibit A: Scope of Services
Exhibit B: Schedule of Compensation
Exhibit C: Insurance Requirements: City Insurance Exhibit INS-A Exhibit D: [RESERVED]
Exhibit E: Living Wage Policy
Exhibit F: Prevailing Wage Policy
7. DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES. The Designated Representatives listed below shall be authorized to act on behalf of the named Party, be responsible for negotiations and contractual matters, and coordinate with each other to perform the Services under this Agreement. Additionally, Consultant’s Services shall be performed or immediately supervised by the Consultant’s Representative:
City Designated Representative
Name: Jan Hauser
Title: Wastewater Division Manager
Phone: (805) 271-2205
Email : [email protected]
Address: 6001 Perkins Road
Oxnard, CA 93030
Consultant Designated Representative
Name: Rashi Gupta
Title: Senior Vice President
Phone: (714) 788-1925
Email: [email protected]
Address: 707 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 3290
Los Angeles, CA 90017
8. CONTRACTUAL PREREQUSITIES. This Agreement must first be executed by the Consultant, after which the Agreement shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney, then executed by the Mayor, or an authorized person on behalf of the City, and if executed by the Mayor shall also be executed by the City Clerk.
A. Consultant is advised that any recommendation for Agreement award is not binding on City until the Agreement is fully executed and approved by City.
259
Agreement No. 32500458
B. A request for modification of the terms, prior to execution of the Agreement, must be made in writing and presented to the Designated Representative of the City prior to the time this Agreement is executed.
C. All proof of a City tax certificate, insurance, and W-9 forms is required prior to execution of this Agreement.
D. Consultant shall not perform any work under this Agreement until a proof of insurance has been provided to the City as required under Section 24 of this Agreement.
9. CONSULTANT’S SERVICES.
A. Consultant shall perform the tasks, obligations, and Services set forth in the “Scope of Services,” attached to and incorporated into this Agreement as “Exhibit A.” Once this Agreement is executed, the Scope of Services may only be modified by written Amendment pursuant to Section 13 of this Agreement.
B. The Services shall be coordinated with the designated City Project Manager set forth in Exhibit A subject to the direction of the City Manager or Department Director. Consultant hereby designates its Project Manager as set forth in “Exhibit A” as the person responsible for the Services who shall coordinate with City’s Project Manager in executing the Scope of Services under this Agreement.
10. COMPENSATION. City shall pay Consultant for the Services performed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement and the “Schedule of Compensation,” attached to and incorporated into this Agreement as “Exhibit B.” City shall pay Consultant an amount not to exceed the amount is listed in Section 5 of this Agreement. Once this Agreement is executed, the Schedule of Compensation may only be modified by written Amendment pursuant to Section 13 of this Agreement, and may be subject to approval by the City Council.
11. PAYMENT and INVOICES. The City shall pay all undisputed portions of any applicable invoice within thirty (30) days after receipt of an invoice. In the event the City disputes one or more items in an invoice, the City shall, within thirty (30) days after receipt of such invoice, notify the Consultant of the item(s) being disputed and the reason(s) therefore. The City may withhold payment for such disputed items until resolution of the dispute.
A. Payment Request. Consultant shall submit a payment request to CITY by the end of each calendar month listing the Services provided, costs of 260
Agreement No. 32500458
those Services, and total amount due for the month. Invoices may be emailed to: [email protected].
B. Consultant’s acceptance of final payment made pursuant to this Agreement shall constitute a release of City from all claims and liabilities for compensation to Consultant for anything completed, finished or relating to the Services. City’s payment shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of Consultant for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or the Services performed hereunder, nor shall such payment be deemed to be an assumption of responsibility or liability by City for any defect or error in the Services performed by Consultant and its employees, agents and subcontracted Consultants.
C. Consultant shall provide City with a completed Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification, as issued by the Internal Revenue Service. If any sales tax is due for the Services performed by Consultant or materials or products provided to City by Consultant, Consultant shall pay the sales tax. City shall not reimburse Consultant for sales taxes paid by Consultant.
D. Non-Appropriation of Funds. Payments to be made to Consultant by City for the Services performed within the current fiscal year are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted and unencumbered appropriation of City. In the event City does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of the Services beyond the current fiscal year, this Agreement shall cover payment for the Services only up to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which City appropriated sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at that fiscal year’s conclusion.
12. OPTION TO EXTEND AGREEMENT. When in the City’s best interest, this Agreement may only be extended, if the City, in its discretion, exercises an option term in accordance with Section 4 subparagraphs (B) and (C) of this Agreement.
The initial term, plus any option to extend shall not exceed a total of five (5) years. If no option to extend the Agreement appears in section 4(B), then this Agreement shall not be extended.
13. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be amended, modified, or otherwise altered, or its provisions waived, only upon mutual consent of the Parties by written amendment, and as authorized by the Oxnard City Code, Sections 4-59 and 4-60. The City may request that the Consultant perform Extra Services. As used herein, "Extra Services" means any services, which are determined by the City 261
Agreement No. 32500458
to be necessary for the proper completion of the project, but which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. A written amendment signed by both Parties shall be required to authorize performance of and payment for Extra Services.
14. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. City may terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause and without penalty, upon fifteen (15) calendar days’ prior written notice pursuant to Section 22 of this Agreement. Such termination shall be effective on the date specified in the notice, or if no date is specified, then fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of the notice. City shall be liable to Consultant only for work done by Consultant up to and including the date of termination of this Agreement unless the termination is for cause, in which event Consultant need be compensated only to the extent required by law. Consultant may terminate this Agreement at any time during the term of the Agreement by giving the City sixty (60) calendar days’ prior written notice.
15. [RESERVED]
16. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Consultant is and shall at all times remain, as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Neither City nor any of its employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of its employees, except as stated in this Agreement. Consultant has and shall retain the right to exercise full control over the employment, direction, means of performance, location, compensation and discharge of all persons assisting Consultant. This Agreement shall not be interpreted to prevent or preclude Consultant from rendering any Services for Consultant’s own account or to any other person or entity as Consultant in its sole discretion shall determine; provided, however, that performing such Services shall not materially interfere with the Services the Consultant shall perform for the City. The City retains the right to provide general instructions to and observe the Consultant in the performance of all Services done on behalf of the City.
Consultant and its employees, subconsultants, and agents have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity, to incur any debt, obligation or liability on behalf of City, bind City in any manner, or otherwise act on behalf of City as an agent. Consultant T and its employees are not employees of City. Consultant and its employees are not entitled to receive from City any of the benefits or rights afforded employees of City, including but not limited to reserve leave, sick leave, vacation leave, holiday leave, compensatory leave, Public Employees Retirement System benefits, and health, life, dental, long-term disability and workers’ compensation insurance benefits. Consultant shall not, at any time or 262
Agreement No. 32500458
in any manner, represent that it or any of its agents, subconsultants, or employees are in any manner agents, subconsultants, or employees of City.
17. LAWFUL PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall abide by all federal, state, and local laws and regulations as may be related to the performance of duties under this Agreement. Consultant, at its sole expense, shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement, all appropriate permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement.
18. SAFETY REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall not perform any Services for the City when the Consultant is impaired by alcohol or a controlled substance. When there is reasonable cause to believe that any person has violated this provision, that person shall be immediately removed from the premises and be subject to any applicable civil and/or criminal penalties under the City’s Code and/or under state law. All work performed under this Agreement shall be performed in such a manner as to provide safety to the public. The City reserves the right to issue restraining or cease and desist orders to Consultant when unsafe or harmful acts are observed or reported relative to the performance of the work under this Agreement. The acceptance of Consultant 's work by City shall not operate as a release of the Consultant from such standard of care and workmanship.
19. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE; WARRANTY. Consultant agrees to perform all Services required by this Agreement in a professional and competent manner, in accordance with the degree of skill and diligence which is normally employed by reputable professionals performing similar Services under similar conditions in the same or similar locality. Such Services shall also be performed in a manner which is reasonably satisfactory to City Project Manager, or designee (hereinafter the “Project Manager”), provided that discretion in determining what is satisfactory shall not alter the foregoing standard of care.
A. In accordance with the standard of care set forth in the first sentence of Section 19, the Consultant agrees that it:
(1) Has thoroughly reviewed and considered the services and work to be performed; and
(2) Has reviewed the issues regarding the Scope of Services to be provided; and
(3) Has carefully considered how the services and related work should be performed; and
(4) Fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions associated with performance of the services required by this Agreement. 263
Agreement No. 32500458
20. OWNERSHIP OF CONSULTANT’S WORK PRODUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY & DISCLOSURE, RECORDS & WARRANTY. City shall be the owner of any and all technical documents and records, including, computations, plans, correspondence, and/or other pertinent data and information, both hard copy and electronic, gathered or prepared by Consultant in performance of this Agreement and shall be entitled to immediate possession of the same upon completion of the work under this Agreement, or at any earlier or later time when the same may be requested by City.
A. Ownership of Documents. Every report, draft, work product, map, record, and other document reproduced, prepared, or caused to be prepared by the Consultant pursuant to or in connection with this Agreement shall be the exclusive property of the City.
B. Deliverables. Consultant shall deliver to the City the studies, plans, specifications, or other documents as are identified in the Scope of Services; and Consultant shall, upon completion of all work or termination of this Agreement, submit to the City all information developed in the course of the Consultant 's services. Consultant shall, in such time and in such form as the City may require, furnish reports concerning the status of Services required under this Agreement.
Consultant shall, upon request by City and upon completion or termination of this Agreement, deliver to the City all material furnished to Consultant by the City.
C. Records and Inspections. The Consultant shall maintain full and accurate records, with respect to all Services and matters covered under this Agreement. Books and records pertaining to costs shall be kept and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
The City shall have free access at all reasonable times to such records, both hard copy and electronic, and the right to examine and audit the same and to make transcripts therefrom, and to inspect all program data, documents, proceedings, and activities.
D. Confidentiality. Information that is exempt from disclosure to the public is confidential. This includes information relating to the past, present, or future affairs of the City or information belonging to a third party whose information is in the City’s possession or control under obligations of confidentiality. Consultant may be granted access to information that is exempt from disclosure to the public (Government Code Section 7920.505) and may contain “trade secrets” (see Government Code Section 7924.510(f)) when it is necessary for Consultant to perform its obligations pursuant to this Agreement. If Consultant is granted such access to confidential information, Consultant shall not be considered to 264
Agreement No. 32500458
be a member of the public as that term is used in Government Code Section 7920.515.
E. Disclosure of Information. Consultant shall not disclose, publish, or authorize others to disclose or publish, design data, drawings, specifications, reports, or other information pertaining to the projects assigned to Consultant by the City or other information to which the Consultant has had access during the term of this Agreement without the prior written approval of the City’s Designated Representative during the term of this Agreement and for a period of two (2) years after the termination of this Agreement.
F. No Warranty. Other than an obligation upon the City to deal in good faith, the City makes no warranties and shall bear no liability or responsibility for errors or omissions in any Confidential Information disclosed under this Agreement or for any business decisions made by Consultant in reliance on any Confidential Information disclosed under this Agreement.
21. NOTICE OF BREACH AND OPPORTUNITY TO CURE. Neither Party will be in breach of this Agreement where the breach is capable of being cured, or until written notice of the breach is received from the non-breaching Party. The Party charged with breach will have fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of receiving such notice in which to cure the breach or otherwise respond. If the circumstances leading to the charge that the Agreement was breached have not been cured or explained to the satisfaction of the other Party within fifteen (15) days from the date on which the breaching Party received notice of breach, the non-breaching Party may terminate this Agreement. Notice shall be given in the manner set forth in section 22.
22. NOTICE. All notices given or required to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and may be given by personal delivery or by first-class mail. Notice sent by mail shall be addressed to each Party’s Designated Representative as set forth above in Section 7. When addressed in accordance with this Section, such notice shall be deemed given upon deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. In all other instances, notices shall be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this Section.
23. INDEMNIFICATION, HOLD HARMLESS & DEFENSE. Except as set forth in Subsection A of this Section 23, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall immediately defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its 265
Agreement No. 32500458
officers, employees, representatives, and agents (the “City Indemnitees”), from and against those actions, suits, proceedings, claims, demands, losses, costs, and expenses, including legal costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, for any personal injuries, deaths, or property damage, including property owned by the City (collectively “Claims”) which may arise out of Consultant's negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of the services described in this Agreement, unless such Claims are proven to be caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the City Indemnitees.
A. The provisions of this Subsection apply only in the event that Consultant is a design professional within the meaning of California Civil Code section 2782.8 (“Design Professional”). The term Design Professional, as defined in said section, is limited to licensed architects, licensed landscape architects, registered professional engineers, professional land surveyors, and the business entities that offer such services in accordance with the applicable provisions of the California Business and Professions Code.
(1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 23 above, to the extent that the services to be provided under this Agreement are those of a Design Professional, Consultant's duty to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City Indemnitees shall be limited to the extent that any Claims arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or subconsultants in the performance of the services described in this Agreement.
(2) In no event shall the costs of defense charged to Consultant exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault, except as otherwise set forth in said Civil Code section 2782.8, the provisions of which are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Nothing in this Subsection b shall be construed to require Consultant to provide indemnification for Claims caused by the active negligence or willful misconduct of the City Indemnitees
B. The City does not and shall not waive any rights that it may have against Consultant under this Section, because of the acceptance by the City, or the deposit with the City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. The hold harmless and indemnification provisions of this Section 23 shall apply regardless of whether said insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost, or expense described herein. 266
Agreement No. 32500458
C. The obligation to indemnify and defend, as set forth in this Section 23, is binding on the successors, assigns, or heirs of Consultant and shall survive the expiration or any early termination of this Agreement.
24. INSURANCE. Consultant shall obtain and maintain during the performance of any Services under this Agreement the insurance coverages listed within “Exhibit C”, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, unless the Risk Manager waives, in writing, the requirement that Consultant obtain and maintain such insurance coverages. Such insurance must be issued by a company satisfactory to the Risk Manager. Consultant shall, before performance of any Services pursuant to this Agreement, file with the Risk Manager evidence of insurance coverage as specified in “Exhibit C”. Maintenance of insurance coverages by Consultant is a material element of this Agreement. Consultant’s failure to maintain or renew insurance coverages or to provide renewal evidence shall be considered a material breach of this Agreement.
25. LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENTS. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant understands and agrees that if Living Wages are applicable, subject to the 2002 Oxnard City Council Living Wage Policy, attached as “Exhibit E” to this Agreement, Consultant will pay and/or provide the wages and/or benefits required therein to all of its employees engaged in whole or in part in performing the Services provided for by this Agreement. The Living Wage is updated on July 1 of each year, and the duty to pay the correct wage is the responsibility of the Consultant.
26. PREVAILING WAGE REQUIREMENTS. The payment of State prevailing wages as designated for Ventura County shall apply to public works projects. However, this section shall not apply to work performed on a public works project of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) or less when the project is for construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work; or to work performed on a public works project of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) or less when the project is for maintenance work. Prevailing wages are required to be paid to all workers, including subcontracted employees. For further information regarding Prevailing Wage Requirements please refer to Exhibit “F” attached to this Agreement.
A. To determine if this Agreement is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement, go to:
https://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/PublicWorksSB854FAQ.html B. It is unlawful to split, or separate into small portions, work orders, projects, purchases, or public works projects for the purpose of evading these prevailing wage requirements.
267
Agreement No. 32500458
C. In the event that there is a difference between the amount of wages to be paid under the City of Oxnard’s local Living Wage requirements and the requirements of this provision, the wage rate that is the higher of the two shall be applicable to this Agreement. The duty to pay the correct wage is the responsibility of the Consultant.
27. [RESERVED]
28. SUBCONTRACTING. If Consultant requires the assistance of a subcontractor to render any Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain prior written consent from the City before a subcontractor performs any service pursuant to this Agreement. All subcontractors shall be identified in the Scope of Work attached to this Agreement as “Exhibit A”. Consultant is fully responsible for satisfactory completion of all its subcontractors’ work. All subcontractors shall be properly licensed and insured; and bonded, if applicable. Consultant shall be responsible for all liabilities regardless of nature, type, or cause, arising out of or resulting from or in connection with subcontractors performance pursuant to this Agreement or subcontractors failure to comply with any of its obligations in connection with this Agreement.
29. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Consultant covenants that it does not have any interest, nor shall it acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of Consultant’s Services under this Agreement.
Consultant further covenants that in the performance of Services under this Agreement, no officer, employee or agent of Consultant having such interest shall be employed by it. In the event the City determines that Consultant must disclose its financial interests by completing and filing a Fair Political Practices Commission Form 700, Statement of Economic Interests, Consultant shall file such Form 700 with the City Clerk’s Office pursuant to the written instructions provided by the City Clerk. Acquisition or maintenance of a conflicting interest by Consultant may result in termination of this Agreement by the City.
30. DISPUTES. Except as otherwise provided in these provisions, any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under this Agreement, shall be decided by the City’s Designated Representative, who shall reduce this decision to writing and mail a copy to the Consultant. The decision of the City’s Designated Representative shall be final and conclusive unless Consultant requests mediation within ten (10) calendar days. Pending final decision of a dispute, the Consultant shall proceed diligently with the performance of the Agreement and in accordance with the decision of the City’s Designated Representative.
268
Agreement No. 32500458
31. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Should an unresolved dispute arise out of this Agreement, any Party may request that it be submitted to mediation. The Parties shall meet in mediation within a reasonable time not to exceed forty five (45) days of a request.
The mediator shall be agreed to by the mediating Parties. In the absence of an Agreement on a mediator, the Parties shall each submit one name from mediators listed by the American Arbitration Association, the California State Board of Mediation and Conciliation, or other agreed-upon service. The mediator shall be selected by a “blindfold” process. The cost of mediation shall be borne equally by both Parties. Neither Party shall be deemed the prevailing Party. No Party shall be permitted to file a legal action without first meeting in mediation and making a good faith attempt to reach a mediated settlement. The mediation process, once commenced by a meeting with the mediator, shall last until Agreement is reached by the Parties but not more than sixty (60) calendar days, unless the maximum time is extended in writing by both Parties.
32. ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement is for the professional Services of Consultant. Any attempt by Consultant to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without the prior written approval of City shall be prohibited and shall be null and void.
Consultant 's Services pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by the Consultant’s Designated Representative or directly under his/her supervision, and Consultant shall not assign another to supervise the Consultant 's performance of this Agreement without the prior written approval of City, by and through the City’s Designated Representative.
33. CARE OF WORK. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the Services or as represented by the City, Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not provide any Services, except at Consultant’s risk, until written instructions are received from the Project Manager.
34. REPORTS. Upon request by the Project Manager or as otherwise required by this Agreement, including but not limited to, the Scope of Services set forth in Exhibit “A”, Consultant shall prepare and submit reports to the City concerning Consultant's performance of the Services required by this Agreement.
35. AUDIT. City shall have the option of inspecting, auditing and/or reproducing all records and other written materials used by Consultant in preparing its billings to City as a condition precedent to any payment to Consultant, or for other purposes relating to the Agreement. Consultant will promptly furnish all documents requested 269
Agreement No. 32500458
by City. Additionally, if this Agreement is in excess of $10,000, the State Auditor may examine and audit Consultant for a period of 3 years after final payment under the Agreement. Regardless of whether a State audit is permitted, Consultant shall maintain and preserve all such records for a period of at least 3 years after final payment under the Agreement or until an audit has been completed and accepted by City, whichever occurs later. Consultant shall maintain all such records in City or to promptly reimburse City for all reasonable costs incurred in conducting the audit at a location other than in City, including but not limited to expenses for personnel, salaries, private auditor, travel, lodging, meals and overhead. Consultant shall include a copy of this Section in all contracts with its subcontractors, and Consultant shall be responsible for immediately obtaining those records or other written material from its subcontractors upon a request by the State Auditor and/or City.
36. ADVERTISING AND PUBLICITY. Consultant shall not use the name of or refer to City directly or indirectly in any advertisement, news release, or professional or trade publication without prior written approval from the City Manager. This Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
37. NONDISCRIMINATORY EMPLOYMENT. Consultant shall not unlawfully discriminate against any individual based on race, color, religion or religious creed, national origin, ancestry, ethnic group identification, primary language, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sex, sexual orientation, age, immigration status, citizenship or military and veteran status. Consultant understands and agrees that it is bound by and will comply with all legal nondiscrimination mandates. For every subcontractor who will perform Services, Consultant shall be responsible for such subcontractor’s compliance with this Section.
38. COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS. Each term and each provision of this Agreement to be performed by Consultant shall be construed to be both a covenant and a condition.
39. WAIVER. City’s review or acceptance of, or payment for, work product prepared by Consultant under this Agreement will not be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights City may have under this Agreement or of any cause of action arising from Consultant’s performance. A waiver by City of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement will not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement, whether of the same or different character. 270
Agreement No. 32500458
40. FORCE MAJEURE. Neither the Consultant nor the City shall be responsible for any delay caused by any contingency beyond their control, including, but not limited to, war or insurrection, walkouts by the Party’s own employees, fires, natural calamities, riots, or demands or requirements of governmental agencies other than the City.
41. GOVERNING LAW. The terms of this Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of California. Should litigation occur, venue shall be in the Superior Court of California, County of Ventura.
42. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this Agreement is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then such portion will be deemed modified to the extent necessary in the opinion of the court to render such portion enforceable and, as so modified, such portion and the balance of this Agreement will continue in full force and effect and be enforceable.
43. INTEGRATED AGREEMENT. This Agreement and the attached exhibits referenced herein to this Agreement represent the entire understanding between the Parties.
No verbal Agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions of this Agreement. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the Parties to this Agreement and any subsequent successors and assigns.
44. NO THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARY. This Agreement shall not be construed to be an Agreement for the benefit of any third-party or parties, and no third party or parties shall have any claim or right of action under this Agreement.
45. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE. Each Party hereto expressly warrants and represents that the signatories to this Agreement have the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of its corporation, partnership, business entity, or governmental entity, and warrants and represents that the signatories have the authority to bind each Party to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
46. EXECUTION – COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and each such duplicate counterpart shall constitute an original, but they shall not be effective nor enforceable unless and until it is executed with the handwritten signature or electronic signature of an authorized representative of each of the relevant Parties. No counterpart shall be deemed to be an original or presumed delivered unless and until the counterpart executed by the other Party to this Agreement is in the physical possession of the Party seeking enforcement thereof.
271
Agreement No. 32500458
47. INCONSISTENT OR CONFLICTING TERMS. In the event of any contradictions or inconsistencies between any attached documents or exhibits incorporated by reference herein and the provisions of the Agreement itself, the terms of the Agreement shall control. Any exhibit that is attached and incorporated by reference shall be limited to the purposes for which it is attached, as specified in this Agreement. Any contractual terms or conditions contained in such exhibit imposing additional obligations on the City are not binding upon the City and City’s Designated Representative unless specifically agreed to in writing, and initiated by City’s Designated Representative, as to each additional contractual term or condition.
48. CAPTIONS AND HEADINGS. The captions and headings contained in this Agreement are provided for identification purposes only and shall not be interpreted to limit or define the content, scope, or intent of the provisions described under the respective caption or heading.
49. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. By signing below, Consultant acknowledges that it has reviewed the City’s Professional Services Agreement terms and conditions and insurance requirements and that Consultant hereby agrees to full compliance. [Signatures on next page]
272
Agreement No. 32500458
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Agreement effective on the date as written in Section 4 and upon signature of all Parties.
CITY OF OXNARD CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC.
☐Luis Mc Arthur, Mayor1 Date Rashi Gupta, Senior Vice President Date ☐Jennifer Yates, Purchasing Manager2
Michael Barnes, Secretary 3 Date
ATTEST:
Lourdes A. López, City Clerk Date
(only if Mayor authorizes)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Stephen M. Fischer, Date
City Attorney (always required)
1 The City Council must authorize and the Mayor must execute any agreement over $220,000. 2 The Purchasing Agent may execute any authorized agreement up to $220,000. 3 The City requires the following for any contract:
● For a corporation, the signatures of the Board President, CEO or Vice President and of the Board Secretary, Assistant Secretary, CFO or Assistant Treasurer;
● For an LLC, the signatures of at least two managers of the LLC (company directors, not lower-level managers); or ● For a partnership, the signature of a partner. If the partnership is a limited partnership, the signer must be a general partner.
If the company has a different structure, or if the above-listed persons are not the appropriate signers, please submit to the City Attorney legally-binding documentation stating who can sign and bind your company. 273
Agreement No. 32500458
EXHIBIT A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
(CITY of Oxnard and CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC.)
SCOPE OF SERVICES
PROJECT MANAGER: Jan Hauser, Wastewater Division Manager, [email protected], (805) 271-2205
Scope of Services
TASK 1 Project Management
Consultant shall provide all of the professional and technical support services required to manage, coordinate, and track the project efforts; provide progress updates to the City; and ensure proactive participation by the City in the Project. The project management’s responsibilities include, but are not limited to:
1. Coordination. Consultant shall coordinate all of the services of sub-consultants including site visits, site inspections, and shall ensure coordination with the City operations and engineering staff and other interested parties as outlined by the City.
2. Schedule. Consultant shall develop a project schedule at the beginning of the project.
The project schedule shall be submitted with the proposal and shall be updated within two (2) weeks of the kickoff meeting.
3. Invoicing. The Consultant shall submit invoices on a monthly basis with all supporting documentation in a format acceptable to the City. Invoices requiring amendment shall be dated according to when the revised invoice is delivered to the City. Invoices shall be delivered electronically to the Project Manager and [email protected].
4. Reporting. Consultant shall prepare and distribute monthly reports with the monthly invoice. Monthly reports should briefly describe the work completed during the invoice period; projected work to be completed in the next month; data needs; issues or outstanding items affecting the project; and budget summary.
5. Communication. Consultant shall develop a communications protocol to be followed by all team members to be submitted within one (1) week of starting the project.
Communication protocol will include standard project communication as well as emergency communication protocols.
6. Meetings.
a. Project Kick-off Meeting. At the commencement of the Project, the Consultant shall facilitate a “kick-off” meeting with the City’s wastewater staff to verify the Project scope and approach. The kickoff meeting will be in person and include a site visit. The Consultant shall prepare and distribute a draft agenda in advance of the meeting for review and comment by the City. The Consultant 274
Agreement No. 32500458
shall prepare and distribute meeting minutes within five (5) business days of the meeting.
b. Progress Meetings. Consultant shall attend monthly virtual meetings for the duration of the project which is estimated to take approximately twelve months.
The Consultant is responsible for developing meeting information and agenda prior to the meeting and meeting minutes following the meeting with a complete action tracking log.
c. Workshops. Consultant shall plan up to four (4) workshops during the Project. The workshops will be held virtually. The Consultant shall develop workshop slides and agenda prior to the workshops and meeting minutes following the workshops.
Workshop 1 – Regulatory Review, Current Operations, Biogas and Biosolids Projections
Workshop 2 – Biosolids and Biogas Alternatives Screening Workshop 3 – Biosolids and Biogas Alternatives Evaluation Findings Workshop 4 – Integrated Resource Recovery Plan
7. Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC). The Consultant shall develop a QA/QC plan, to be followed for all submittals, within two (2) weeks of starting the project. The plan shall include the staff who are responsible for reviewing design and documentation as well as the means for integrating review comments from the City.
Deliverables
Project Schedule
Monthly detailed invoice with Monthly Summary Report
Meeting Agendas and Minutes
Workshop Slides, Agendas, and Minutes
TASK 2 Regulatory and Environmental Review
The Consultant shall review current and anticipated regulations related to biosolids and biogas management at the local, state, and federal levels. Identify any upcoming changes that may impact WRRF’s operations, including but not limited to:
Air Pollution Control District
Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge (40 CFR 503) SB 1383
Greenhouse gas
Deliverables
Regulatory and Environmental Review Report
275
Agreement No. 32500458
TASK 3 Data Review, Current Operations and Future Projections The Consultant shall collect and review all relevant data on existing biosolids and digester gas management operations, including flow process diagrams, operational data, and regulatory requirements.
Conduct a detailed assessment of the current biosolids and digester gas management process. Assess biogas production rates, biogas utilization (e.g., combined heat and power, flaring), and system performance. Assess current biosolids handling processes, including dewatering, stabilization, storage, and final disposal or reuse.
Identify any operational, regulatory, or environmental challenges associated with the current practices.
Determine future biosolids and biogas production over the planning period of 20 years. The Consultant will leverage prior work completed for the City to develop the solids and biogas projections, unless there are changes in process or City intention that negates the past results or approach.
Deliverables
Information request
Future biosolids and biogas production
Summary of current operations and projections
TASK 4 Biosolids Management Alternatives Evaluation
Alternative Treatment Technologies: Evaluate various solids treatment technologies, such as advanced digestion, thermal hydrolysis, composting, and other innovative processes. Assess the potential for nutrient recovery, pathogen reduction, and product quality
End-Use and Disposal Options: Explore alternative end-use options for biosolids, including land application, landfilling, and beneficial reuse. Biosolids Management Alternatives Screening: Screen the solids treatment technologies to up to four (4) alternatives for evaluation. Biosolids Management Alternatives Evaluation: Conduct a cost and non-financial evaluation of the biosolids management alternatives. For each alternative, develop:
o Treatment technology description, preliminary system sizing, site layout, and process flow schematic.
o Biosolids product description and potential end-use options. o Class 5 capital cost estimates, 20-year O&M cost estimates, and life-cycle costs. The costs shall include both the solids treatment and biosolids products end-use.
o Consideration of non-financial criteria, such as social and environmental impacts and benefits, and adaptability to future regulatory and market drivers. Include a quantitative greenhouse gas evaluation of the biosolids management alternatives.
276
Agreement No. 32500458
Deliverables
Biosolids Management Alternatives Evaluation Report
TASK 5 Biogas Management Alternatives Evaluation
Biogas Utilization Options: Assess alternatives for biogas utilization, including combined heat and power systems, direct biogas use (e.g., in boilers), and biogas upgrading technologies.
Energy Recovery and Efficiency: Evaluate opportunities to enhance energy recovery from biogas, improve system efficiencies, and reduce flaring. Biogas Management Alternatives Screening: Screen the biogas management alternatives to up to four (4) alternatives for evaluation. Biogas Management Alternatives Evaluation: Conduct a cost and nonfinancial evaluation of the biogas management alternatives. For each alternative, develop:
o Biogas utilization technology description, preliminary system sizing, site layout, and process flow schematic.
o Class 5 capital cost estimates, 20-year O&M cost estimates, and lifecycle costs. The costs shall include the costs for utilizing the biogas and the revenues or savings from reduced electricity imports, sale of renewable natural gas, and financial incentives such as IRA funding and RIN and LCFS credits, as applicable.
o Consideration of non-financial criteria, such as social and environmental impacts and benefits, and adaptability to future regulatory and market drivers. Include a quantitative greenhouse gas evaluation of the biogas management alternatives.
Deliverables
Biogas Management Alternatives Evaluation Report
TASK 6 INTEGRATED RESOURCE RECOVERY PLAN
Scenario Development: Develop and model various scenarios that integrate biosolids treatment and biogas utilization alternatives. Evaluate the synergy between biosolids and biogas management strategies.
Optimization Analysis: Optimize resource recovery options by analyzing the interdependencies between biosolids management, biogas production, and energy recovery. Consider factors such as scalability, operational flexibility and long-term sustainability.
Power BI dashboard: Develop a Power BI dashboard to support the scenario development and optimization analyses described above. The dashboard will allow the City to better visualize necessary capital allocations over time, conduct sensitivity analysis, and assess the impacts of changes in schedule. Implementation Plan: Develop an implementation roadmap and timeline to phase in the recommended biosolids and biogas management strategies. 277
Agreement No. 32500458
Deliverables
Integrated Resource Recovery Scenarios Report
Power BI Dashboard
TASK 7 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Draft Report: Prepare a draft Biosolids Master Plan report that includes the evaluation of alternatives, recommended strategies, implementation plans, and a roadmap for future improvements.
Review and Revisions: Present the draft report for review. Final Report: Submit the final Biosolids Master Plan, including recommendations for biosolids and biogas management, cost estimates, and an implementation timeline.
Deliverables
Draft and Final Biosolids Master Plan Report
278
Agreement No. 32500458
EXHIBIT B
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
(CITY of Oxnard and CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC.)
SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
279
Agreement No. 32500458
280
Agreement No. 32500458
EXHIBIT C
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
(CITY of Oxnard and CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC.)
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Prior to contract approval and beginning of services under this agreement, Consultant must procure, agree to maintain and supply evidence of insurance at the levels listed and in accordance with the other provisions listed in this document.
INS-A
[SEE NEXT PAGES]
281
Agreement No. 32500458
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSULTANTS
(WITH ERRORS AND OMISSIONS REQUIREMENT)
1. Consultant shall obtain and maintain during the performance of any services under this Agreement the following insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of services hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants.
a. Commercial General Liability Insurance, including Contractual Liability, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage for each claimant for general liability with coverage equivalent to Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability Coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001). If a general aggregate limit is used, that limit shall apply separately to the project or shall be twice the occurrence amount;
b. Business automobile liability insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage for each claimant for automobile liability with coverage equivalent to Insurance Services Office automobile liability coverage (Occurrence Form CA0001) covering Code No. 1, “any auto;” c. Professional liability/errors and omissions insurance appropriate to Consultant’s profession to a minimum coverage of $1,000,000, with neither Consultant nor listed subconsultants having less than $500,000 individually. The professional liability/errors and omissions insurance must be project specific with at least a one year extended reporting period, or longer upon request. d. Workers’ compensation insurance in compliance with the laws of the State of California, and employer’s liability insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per claimant. Additionally, the workers’ compensation policy shall include a waiver of all rights of subrogation which the insurer may have against the City.
2. Consultant shall, prior to performance of any services, file with the Risk Manager certificates of insurance with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Exhibit INS-A. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements are to be on the attached forms or on other forms approved by the Risk Manager. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the Risk Manager before commencement of services.
City reserves the right to require complete certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time. The certificates of insurance and endorsements shall be sent via email. If you have not received your request or are having difficulty with electronic upload, contact [email protected]
3. Consultant agrees that all insurance coverages shall be provided by a California admitted insurance carrier with an A.M. Best rating of A:VII or better and shall be endorsed to state that coverage may not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or limits without 30 days’ prior written notice to the Risk Manager. The Risk Manager shall not approve or accept any endorsement if the endorsement contains “best effort” modifiers or if the insurer is relieved from the responsibility to give such notice.
4. Consultant agrees that the commercial general liability and business automobile liability insurance policies shall be endorsed to name City, its City Council, officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its City Council, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. The General Liability Special Endorsement Form and Automobile Liability Special Endorsement Form attached to this Exhibit INS-A or substitute forms containing the same information and acceptable to the Risk Manager shall be used to provide the endorsements (ISO form CG 2010 11/85 or if not available, CG 2010 with an edition date prior to 01/04 and CG 2037).
5. The coverages provided to City shall be primary and not contributing to or in excess of any existing City insurance or self-insurance coverages (this must be endorsed). Additionally, the workers’ compensation policy shall include a waiver of all rights of subrogation which the insurer may have against the City. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to City, its City Council, officers, employees and volunteers. The insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
6. The insurer shall declare any deductibles or self-insured retentions to and be approved by the Risk Manager.
At the option of the Risk Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City, its City Council, officers, employees and volunteers, or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
7. All insurance standards applicable to Consultant shall also be applicable to Consultant's subconsultants.
Consultant agrees to maintain appropriate agreements with subconsultants and to provide proper evidence of coverage upon receipt of a written request from the Risk Manager. 3/25
282
Agreement No. 32500458
INSTRUCTION FOR SUBMITTING INSURANCE CERTIFICATES AND ENDORSEMENT FORMS Certificates of Insurance
The sample accord form on the following page is provided to facilitate your preparation and submission of certificates of insurance. You may use this or any industry form that shows coverage as broad as that shown on the attached sample. Please note the certificate holder address must be as shown on the attached sample accord form with the contract number and insurance exhibit identification information completed.
Improperly addressed certificates may delay the contract start-up date because the City’s practice is to return unidentifiable insurance certificates to the insured for clarification as to the contract number. Cancellation provisions must be endorsed to the policy. Modifying the certificate does not change coverage or obligate the carrier to provide notice of cancellation.
Endorsement Forms
Original endorsements are required for commercial general liability and business automobile liability insurance policies and must be attached to the applicable certificate of insurance. City preference is that the Consultant/insurer use the endorsement forms which are attached. Substitute forms will be accepted, however, as long as they include provisions comparable to the sample accord form.
INS-A.doc
283
Agreement No. 32500458
ACORD CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE ISSUE DATE (MM/DD/YY)
PRODUCER
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
CODE SUB-CODE COMPANIES AFFORDING INSURANCE COVERAGE
INSURED COMPANY
LETTER A SPECIFY COMPANY NAMES IN THIS SPACE
COMPANY
LETTER B
COVERAGES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY
PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO
WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
CO
LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY
NUMBER
POLICY
EFFECTIVE
DATE
(MM/DD/YY)
POLICY
EXPIRATION
DATE
(MM/DD/YY) LIMITS
A GENERAL LIABILITY
[x] COMMERCIAL GENERAL
LIABILITY [ ] CLAIMS
MADE [x] OCCUR.
[x] OWNER'S &
CONTRACTOR'S PROT.
GENERAL AGGREGATE $1,000,000
PRODUCTS COMP/OP AGG . $1,000,000
PERSONAL & ADV. INJURY $1,000,000
EACH OCCURRENCE $1,000,000
FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $
MED. EXPENSE (Any one person) $
A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
[x] ANY AUTO
ALL OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
HIRED AUTOS
NON-OWNED AUTOS
GARAGE LIABILITY
COMBINED SINGLE $1,000,000
LIMIT
BODILY INJURY $
(Per person)
BODILY INJURY $
(Per accident)
PROPERTY DAMAGE $
A EXCESS LIABILITY
UMBRELLA FORM
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA
FORM
EACH OCCURRENCE $
AGGREGATE $
A WORKERS'
COMPENSATION
AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
STATUTORY LIMITS
EACH ACCIDENT $1,000,000
DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $1,000,000
DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE $1,000,000
A OTHER
Errors and omissions insurance or malpractice insurance available for the insured's profession
Minimum coverage $1,000,000
Each consultant/ $500,000
& listed sub-consultant
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
CITY OF OXNARD ℅ Evident ID, Inc.
8520 Allison Pointe Blvd. Ste 223
PMB 5210
Indianapolis, Indiana 462500-4299 US
CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30
DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT
FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES.
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
284
Agreement No. 32500458
GENERAL LIABILITY SPECIAL ENDORSEMENT
FOR THE CITY OF OXNARD (the “City”)
SUBMIT IN DUPLICATE
ENDORSEMENT NO. ISSUE DATE (MM/DD/YY)
PRODUCER POLICY INFORMATION:
Insurance Company:
Policy No.:
Policy Period: (from) (to)
LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSE Included in Limits
In Addition to Limits
Telephone: Deductible Self-Insured Retention (check which) of $ with an Aggregate of $ applies to NAMED INSURED coverage. Per Occurrence Per Claim (which) APPLICABILITY. This insurance pertains to the operations, products and/or tenancy of the named insured under all written agreements and permits in force with the City unless checked here in which case only the following specific agreements and permits with the City are covered
CITY AGREEMENTS/PERMITS
TYPE OF INSURANCE
GENERAL LIABILITY
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY
OWNERS & CONTRACTORS PROTECTIVE
Claims Made
Retroactive Date
Occurrence
OTHER PROVISIONS
COVERAGES LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS $
EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE
GENERAL
PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS
PERSONAL & ADVERTISING INJURY
FIRE DAMAGE
CLAIMS: Underwriter’s representative for claims pursuant to this insurance.
Name:
Address:
Telephone: ( )
In consideration of the premium charged and notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any endorsement now or hereafter attached thereto, insurance company agrees as follows:
INSURED. The City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers are included as insureds with regard to liability and defense of suits arising from the operations, products and activities performed by or on behalf of the named insured.
CONTRIBUTION NOT REQUIRED. As respects: (a) work performed by the named insured for or on behalf of the City; or (b) products sold by the named insured to the City; or (c) premises leased by the named insured from the City, the insurance afforded by this policy shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers; or stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the named insured’s scheduled underlying primary coverage. In either event, any other insurance maintained by the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.
SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST. This insurance applies separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the company’s limits of liability. The inclusion of any person or organization as an insured shall not affect any right which such person or organization would have as a claimant if not so included.
CANCELLATION NOTICE. With respect to the interests of the City, this insurance shall not be canceled, or materially reduced in coverage or limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by receipted delivery has been given to the City.
PROVISIONS REGARDING THE INSURED’S DUTIES. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policy or breaches or violations of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers.
SCOPE OF COVERAGE. This policy, if primary, affords coverage at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability Coverage, “occurrence” form CG0001; or If excess, affords coverage which is at least as broad as the primary insurance form CG0001.
Except as stated above nothing herein shall be held to waive, alter or extend any of the limits, conditions, agreements or exclusions of the policy to which this endorsement is attached.
ENDORSEMENT HOLDER
CITY OF OXNARD ℅ Evident ID, Inc.
8520 Allison Pointe Blvd. Ste 223
PMB 5210
Indianapolis, Indiana 462500-4299 US
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Broker/Agent Underwriter
I (print/type name), warrant that I have authority to
bind the above-mentioned insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company to this endorsement.
Signature
(original signature required)
Telephone: ( ) Date Signed:
285
Agreement No. 32500458
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY SPECIAL ENDORSEMENT
FOR THE CITY OF OXNARD (the “City”)
SUBMIT IN DUPLICATE
ENDORSEMENT NO. ISSUE DATE (MM/DD/YY)
PRODUCER POLICY INFORMATION:
Insurance Company:
Policy No.:
Policy Period: (from) (to)
LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSE Included in Limits
In Addition to Limits
Telephone: Deductible Self-Insured Retention (check which) of $ with an Aggregate of $ applies to NAMED INSURED coverage. Per Occurrence Per Claim (which) APPLICABILITY. This insurance pertains to the operations, products and/or tenancy of the named insured under all written agreements and permits in force with the City unless checked here in which case only the following specific agreements and permits with the City are covered:
CITY AGREEMENTS/PERMITS
TYPE OF INSURANCE OTHER PROVISIONS
COMMERCIAL AUTO POLICY
BUSINESS AUTO POLICY
OTHER
LIMIT OF LIABILITY
CLAIMS: Underwriter’s representative for claims pursuant to this insurance.
Name:
Address:
Telephone: ( )
$ per accident, for bodily injury and property damage.
In consideration of the premium charged and notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any endorsement now or hereafter attached thereto, insurance company agrees as follows:
1. INSURED. The City, its officers, agents, volunteers and employees are included as insureds with regard to liability and defense of suits arising from the operations, products and activities performed by or on behalf of the named insured.
CONTRIBUTION NOT REQUIRED. As respects: (a) work performed by the named insured for or on behalf of the City; or (b) products sold by the named insured to the City; or (c) premises leased by the named insured from the City, the insurance afforded by this policy shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers; or stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the named insured’s scheduled underlying primary coverage. In either event, any other insurance maintained by the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.
SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST. This insurance applies separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the company’s limits of liability. The inclusion of any person or organization as an insured shall not affect any right which such person or organization would have as a claimant if not so included.
CANCELLATION NOTICE. With respect to the interests of the City, this insurance shall not be canceled, or materially reduced in coverage or limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by receipted delivery has been given to the City.
PROVISIONS REGARDING THE INSURED’S DUTIES. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policy or breaches or violations of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers.
SCOPE OF COVERAGE. This policy, if primary, affords coverage at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability Coverage, “occurrence” form CA0001, code ("any auto"); or If excess, affords coverage which is at least as broad as the primary insurance form referenced in the preceding section (1).
Except as stated above nothing herein shall be held to waive, alter or extend any of the limits, conditions, agreements or exclusions of the policy to which this endorsement is attached.
ENDORSEMENT HOLDER
CITY OF OXNARD ℅ Evident ID, Inc.
8520 Allison Pointe Blvd. Ste 223
PMB 5210
Indianapolis, Indiana 462500-4299 US
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Broker/Agent Underwriter
I (print/type name), warrant that I have authority to
bind the above-mentioned insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company to this endorsement.
Signature
(original signature required)
Telephone: ( ) Date Signed
Rev. 3/25
286
Agreement No. 32500458
EXHIBIT D
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
(CITY of Oxnard and CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC.)
[RESERVED]
287
Agreement No. 32500458
EXHIBIT E
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
(CITY of Oxnard and CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC.)
LIVING WAGE POLICY
Pursuant to the Living Wage Policy adopted July 9, 2002 by the City Council and effective October 1, 2002, the City Manager and City Attorney are directed to include the following language in all standard Consultant/Professional Services contracts that may be governed by the Living Wage Policy.
A. Consultant shall compensate any employee of Consultant who provides Services under this Agreement in accordance with the Living Wage Policy, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as the Living Wage Policy Exhibit. While this Agreement is in effect, Consultant shall pay such employee no less than $19.51 per hour for each hour that such employee provides Services under this Agreement. In addition, while this Agreement is in effect, Consultant shall provide to such employee no less than 96 hours of paid leave per calendar year.
B. Consultant agrees to post, at a location readily accessible to those employees providing Services to the City, a copy of the Living Wage Policy adopted by City Council on July 9, 2002 and effective October 1, 2002.
C. If Consultant fails to compensate such employee pursuant to the Living Wage Policy, the City Manager or designee shall terminate this Agreement on written notice to Consultant, effective immediately.
D. In addition, if Consultant fails to comply with the Living Wage Policy in any manner, Consultant shall pay to City a fine of $500 and shall pay to any employee providing Services under this Agreement a penalty of three times the amount or value of the compensation owed to such employee under the Living Wage Policy. Consultant shall pay such fine and penalty within fifteen (15) calendar days after the City Manager or designee provides written notice to Consultant of the amount owed.
288
Agreement No. 32500458
CITY OF OXNARD LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENTS
EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2024
Consultant shall compensate any employee of Consultant who provides Services under this Agreement in accordance with the Living Wage Policy, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit E.
While this Agreement is in effect, Consultant shall pay such employee no less than $19.51 per hour for each hour that such employee provides Services under this Agreement. This hourly rate shall be adjusted on July 1, 2025, and each July 1 thereafter, according to the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, all items, prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Los Angeles area relating to all urban consumers (CPI-U), index base 1982-84=100, comparing May of the previous year to May of the current year. In addition, while this Agreement is in effect, Consultant shall provide to such employee no less than 96 hours of paid leave per calendar year. a. Consultant agrees to post, at a location readily accessible to those employees providing Services to the City, a copy of the Living Wage Policy adopted by the Oxnard City Council on July 9, 2002 and effective October 1, 2002.
b. If Consultant fails to compensate such employee pursuant to the Living Wage Policy, the City Manager or designee shall terminate this Agreement on written notice to Consultant, effective immediately. c. In addition, if Consultant fails to comply with the Living Wage Policy in any manner, Consultant shall pay to City a fine of $500 and shall pay to any employee providing Services under this Agreement a penalty of three times the amount or value of the compensation owed to such employee under the Living Wage Policy. Consultant shall pay such fine and penalty within fifteen (15) calendar days after the City Manager or designee provides written notice to Consultant of the amount owed.
289
Agreement No. 32500458
EXHIBIT F
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
(CITY of Oxnard and CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC.)
PREVAILING WAGE
1. Consultant acknowledges that the Project defined in the Agreement between Consultant and City is a “public work” as defined in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 of the California Labor Code (“Chapter 1”), and that this Agreement is subject to Chapter 1 and the rules and regulations established by the Director of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) implementing such statutes.
Consultant shall perform the Project as a public work. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by all the terms, rules and regulations described in Chapter 1 and the DIR’s rules and regulations as though set forth in full herein.
2. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to perform the Agreement are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any interested party on request. Consultant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the DIR determination of such prevailing rate of per diem wages, and Consultant shall post such rates at each job site covered by this Agreement.
3. Consultant is required to post job site notices, as prescribed by regulation. See Labor Code Section 1771.4(a)(2).
4. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages.
Consultant shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit not more than $200 for each calendar day or portion thereof for each worker paid less than the DIR’s determined prevailing rates for the work or craft in which the worker is employed pursuant to this Agreement by Consultant or any subcontractor.
The Labor Commissioner shall determine the amount of the penalty as described in Section 1775.
5. Consultant shall comply with Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Consultant and each subcontractor to (1) keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, (2) certify and make such payroll records available for inspection, and (3) inform City of the location of the records.
6. Consultant shall comply with Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 and California Administrative Code Title 8, Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects for all 290
Agreement No. 32500458
apprenticeable occupations. Before commencing work under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within 60 days after concluding the Project, Consultant and each of its subcontractors shall submit to City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Agreement.
7. Consultant may not be debarred or suspended throughout the Agreement Term pursuant to Labor Code Section 1777.1 or 1777.7. If he, she or it becomes debarred or suspended in the Agreement Term, Consultant must immediately notify City.
8. Consultant is not qualified to bid on, be listed in a Bid proposal, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, as defined in Labor Code Sections 1720 through 1861, unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5.
Consultant shall continue without interruption to stay registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 for the duration of the term of this Agreement. This provision does not apply to construction, alteration, demolition, installation or repair work of $25,000 or less or to maintenance work of $15,000 or less.
9. Consultant acknowledges that 8 hours labor constitutes a legal day’s work. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section 1810.
10. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. Consultant shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit $25 for each worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1815, work performed by Consultant’s employees in excess of 8 hours per day and 40 hours per week shall be permitted upon public work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day at not less than 1 ½ times the basic rate of pay.
11. The Project listed in the Agreement is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR.
12. Consultant shall be responsible for each and every one of its subcontractors’ compliance with Chapter 1, the DIR’s rules and regulations, and Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700. Consultant shall include in the written contract between it and each subcontractor a copy of, and a 291
Agreement No. 32500458
requirement that each subcontractor shall comply with, those statutory provisions. Consultant shall be required to take all actions necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractors’ compliance, including without limitation, conducting a periodic review of the certified payroll records of each subcontractor, and upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to pay its workers the specified prevailing rate of wages, Consultant shall diligently take corrective action to halt or rectify any failure.
13. To the maximum extent, Consultant shall hold harmless, defend (with counsel approved by the City Attorney) and indemnify City, its legislative bodies, and its officials, officers, employees and agents from any demand or claim for damages, compensation, fines, penalties or other amounts arising out of or incidental to any acts or omissions listed above by any person or entity (including Consultant, its subcontractors, and each of their officials, officers, employees and agents) in connection with any work undertaken or in connection with the Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all attorneys’ fees and other related costs. All duties of Consultant under this Section shall survive Agreement termination. 292
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM NO. M.1
DATE: May 6, 2025
TO: City Council
FROM: Brenda Lopez, Interim Housing Director, (805) 385-8092, [email protected] SUBJECT: 2025-2029 Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan, 2025-2029 Ventura County Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, and the 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan. (10 minutes)
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
1. Conduct a public hearing to receive comments regarding the 2025-2029 Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan, the 2025-2029 Ventura County Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, and the 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan to be submitted to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Community Planning and Development;
2. Approve the 2025-2029 Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan and the 2025-2029 Ventura County Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice;
3. Authorize the City Manager, or his designees, to incorporate any recommended changes resulting from public input to the Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan, the Ventura County Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, and 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan;
4. Approve the 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan and incorporate the final HUD allocations into the Plan and authorize the budget appropriations to fund the administration and activities in the Plan;
5. Authorize the City Manager, or his designees, to make any budgetary adjustments within ten percent, or $200,000, whichever is greater – per the Citizen Participation Plan of the proposed budget in the 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan that is approved by City Council; and
6. Authorize the City Manager, or his designees, to execute HUD agreements and sign all agreements for the implementation of the Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan, Ventura County Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, and Annual Action Plan including subrecipient, interdepartmental, and intradepartmental agreements.
(The Community Services, Public Safety, Housing & Development Committee approved 3-0 on April 8, 2025.) Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video: https://youtu.be/ClHcikKEsR0
BACKGROUND
The City of Oxnard receives three entitlement grants from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) – the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), the HOME Investment Partnerships Act program (HOME), and the Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) on an annual basis. To receive the three entitlement grants, the City of Oxnard must prepare, submit, and receive approval of a Consolidated Plan, an Annual Action Plan, and an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice before funds are disbursed. Below is more information on the required plans and entitlement grants.
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan 293
HUD approved the City of Oxnard’s participation in the five-year, 2020-2024 Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan (Regional Consolidated Plan), that assessed the housing and community development needs of all incorporated cities and the unincorporated areas of the Ventura County. The County of Ventura served as the lead agency. This was Oxnard’s first involvement with the Regional Consolidated Plan. Prior to the involvement in the Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan, the city conducted its own Consolidated Plans.
A Consolidated Plan must consist of the following:
1. A detailed description of the consultation and citizen participation undertaken to collect information from residents and stakeholders.
2. A needs assessment that analyzes needs related to affordable housing, special needs housing, community development and homelessness.
3. A market analysis that examines demographics, the supply of affordable housing, the regional housing market, and other conditions that impact community needs and the programs that address these needs.
4. A strategic plan that identifies specific goals for the City of Oxnard based on the highest priority needs.
The Regional Consolidated Plan also includes the City of Oxnard’s Annual Action plan for the first year of the plan, which describes the planned investment of federal resources to implement specific activities that meet the year’s strategic goals.
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
The City of Oxnard also partnered with the County of Ventura and surrounding cities, in the production of the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI). The AI provides communities with an opportunity to examine progress toward the goals of eliminating housing discrimination and providing current and future residents access to housing opportunities.
An AI must consist of the following:
1. An analysis of fair housing issues. Fair housing issues can include local or regional segregation, racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, disproportionate housing needs, and evidence of discrimination or violations of civil rights law or regulations related to housing.
2. After conducting the data analysis and identifying the fair housing issues, a list of contributing factors is developed.
A contributing factor is a factor that creates, contributes, perpetuates or increases the severity of one or more fair housing issues.
3. For each fair housing issue and its contributing factors, the jurisdiction must then develop a list of fair housing goals. A fair housing goal is a specific meaningful action that can reasonably be expected to achieve material positive change that affirmatively further fair housing by increasing fair housing choice or decreasing disparities in access to opportunity.
The AI is developed and submitted along with the Regional Consolidated Plan every five years.
HUD Entitlement Grant Programs
Below is a brief narrative of the three entitlement grants received annually.
Community Development Block Grants
The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) supports low- and moderate-income persons by providing decent housing, suitable living environments and expanding economic opportunities. Eligible CDBG activities include: park improvements, alley and street improvements, facility improvements, homeownership assistance, housing rehabilitation, economic development, and public services that benefit low- and moderate-income residents.
HOME Investment Partnerships Program
The HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) supports low-income persons with expanded housing opportunities. Eligible HOME activities include: rental housing, homeowner rehabilitation, homebuyer programs and tenant-based rental assistance.
Emergency Solutions Grant
294
The Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) supports moving homeless persons into stable housing with supportive services, with the goal of self-sufficiency. Eligible ESG activities include: street outreach, emergency shelter operations, rental assistance and supportive services.
DISCUSSION
The current Regional Consolidated Plan expires June 30, 2025. In preparation for the plan expiring, the County of Ventura, serving as the lead agency, along with all incorporated cities and unincorporated areas of Ventura County, issues a joint Request for Proposal. They invited qualified organizations to submit proposals for the preparation of the 2025- 2029 Consolidated Plan and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. Three (3) proposals were submitted by the following organizations: MDG Associates, Incorporated (MDG), TDA Consulting, Incorporated and Veronica Tam and Associates, Incorporated.
After a thorough review of all proposals, MDG was selected. MDG has over thirty-four (34) years of experience providing consulting services to government agencies, with a focus on planning and administering programs funded by HUD.
Citizen Participation
As part of the development, MDG led community outreach in an effort to provide an opportunity for citizens, non-profit organizations and other stakeholders to help define priorities for addressing local community needs. Robust county-wide outreach was completed by way of community meetings and surveys. In total, sixty-two (62) Oxnard residents or stakeholders participated in the development of the Consolidated Plan and AI.
A copy of the Citizen Participation Plan is attached to this report (Attachment 1). 2025-2029 Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan
To develop the 2025-2029 Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan (Regional Consolidated Plan), qualitative and quantitative data was gathered through citizen and stakeholder participation, a market analysis, and an assessment of local data.
The plan puts forth the following regional goals to meet high-priority needs:
1. Improve the supply of affordable housing.
2. Increase and improve social services.
3. Work to end homelessness.
4. Create and maintain quality neighborhoods.
5. Promote economic development.
6. Effective administration.
A copy of the Regional Consolidated Plan is attached to this report (Attachment 2). 2025-2029 Ventura County Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice The 2025-2029 Ventura County Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) drew from much of the work that was completed as part of the 2021-2029 Housing Element. As part of the state-mandated Housing Element, California jurisdictions must conduct a fair housing assessment that includes an analysis of fair housing issues, identify the factors that contribute to those issues and meaningful actions to affirmatively further fair housing. The AI put forth numerous fair housing goals to address the four (4) fair housing issues identified in the plan.
Listed below are some of the goals identified in the plan.
1. Facilitate the creation of affordable housing in high resource areas.
2. Distribute information regarding fair housing, tenant rights, rehabilitation loans, first-time home buyers and Section 8 programs.
3. Actively recruit residents from neighborhoods of concentrated poverty to serve or participate on boards, committees and other local government bodies.
4. Prioritize green infrastructure investment in areas of concentrated poverty. 295
5. Encourage the construction of ADU’s.
A copy of the AI is attached to this report (Attachment 3). 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan
Each year, the City of Oxnard must submit an Annual Action Plan (AAP) which serves as an application for its three entitlement grant programs referenced above. The AAP identifies specific activities, goals and funding allocations for the year.
The City of Oxnard is expected to receive an award of $1,888,317 in CDBG, $535,916 in HOME, and $175,122 in ESG in fiscal year 2025-2026. In addition, the Housing Department estimates program income in the amount of $100,000 from CDBG, and $150,000 from HOME, which will increase the total allocation to $2,849,355. These are estimates until HUD provides the actual award allocations. Staff will adjust the subawards in accordance to the actuals received.
CBDG Program Funding
The estimated allocation and program income is $1,988,317. The use of funds will be capped according to the HUD regulations for: (1) Administration and Planning - no more than 20%, or $397,663 and (2) Public Services up to 15%, or $298,247. The balance of $1,292,407 will be distributed as Public Improvements and Other Programs in the Annual Action Plan.
ESG Program Funding
The estimated allocation is $175,122. The use of funds will be capped according to the HUD regulations for: (1) Administration and Planning - no more than 7.5% or $13,134 and (2) Emergency Shelter and Street Outreach cost is no more than 60%, or $105,073. The balance of $56,915 will be distributed for Homeless Prevention, HMIS, and Rapid Re-Housing eligible activities, as detailed in the Annual Action Plan.
HOME Program Funding
The estimated allocation and program income is $685,916. The uses of funds will be capped according to the HUD regulations for: (1) HOME Administration and Planning costs are no more than 10% or $68,591 and (2) Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) - cost is no more than 15% of the allocation (not including program income), or $80,387. The balance of $536,938 will be distributed to an affordable housing project as gap financing.
Unlike the above grants, a specific application window is not opened for this grant. Rather, developers are asked to apply when projects are ready for funding.
A copy of the AAP is attached to this report (Attachment 4).
Annual Action Plan Funding Recommendations
Annually, the Housing Department issues a Notification of Funding Availability (NOFA) for non-profits and city departments to apply for CDBG and ESG funding. In order to apply, proposers are required to attend a mandatory workshop to learn about the application process and federal regulations. Applications were received from February 3, 2025 through March 3, 2025.
The Housing department received nineteen (19) CDBG applications and six (6) ESG applications. CDBG Public Service applicants cumulatively requested $659,000, while the total funding available in this category is $298,247. The Public Improvements and Other Programs CDBG applicants requested $2,169,432, while the total funding available in this category is $1,292,407.
ESG applicants cumulatively requested a total of $303,170, while the total funding available is $161,988.
In addition to recommending funding for the allowed Administration and Planning percentages to both CDBG and ESG, Staff recommends awarding ten (10) CDBG applications and three (3) ESG applications funding. A list of the applications (Attachment 5) and funding recommendations (Attachment 6) is attached to this report.
Public Hearings
On December 18, 2024, staff conducted the first of two public hearings required for the adoption of the three plans. The first public hearing provided the community with an overview of the three plans, shared data and initial findings and 296
offered the community an opportunity to provide input. The second public hearing is scheduled for May 6, 2025, during the City Council meeting.
There is a 30-day public comment period for members of the public to comment on all three documents. The comment period is scheduled for April 4, 2025 to May 6, 2025. Public comments will be accepted up to the City Council’s closing of the public hearing. The drafts of the Regional Consolidated Plan, AI and AAP are available electronically on the City of Oxnard Housing Department, Grants Management website.
Submitting the Plans to HUD
If the City Council approves the recommended action, staff will submit all three plans to HUD for approval. The plans are typically due to HUD on May 17, 2025. However, due to federal budget delays, MDG is recommending to hold off submission until HUD's budget is finalized, and the City is notified of its allocation.
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item supports the Quality of Life strategy. The purpose of the Quality of Life strategy is to restore and increase quality services and programs that enrich Oxnard's diverse community, promotes safe neighborhoods, encourages community engagement, and supports our residents in their efforts to improve their quality of life.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Funds identified in this report and subsequent attachment are new funding allocations that will be included in the FY2025-26 recommended budget. The 2025-2026 Annual Action plan outlines how the City of Oxnard plans to allocate its three entitlement grant programs for the fiscal year 2025-2026 budget. This includes the 2025-2026 HUD grant allocation estimates of $1,988,317 in CDBG, $685,916 in HOME and $175,122 in ESG. The grand total of available resources is estimated at $2,849,355.
(For Finance Use Only: CDBG Fund 201, HOME Fund 202 and ESG Fund 203)
COMMITTEE OUTCOME
The Community Services, Public Safety, Housing & Development Committee approved 3-0 on April 8, 2025, to approve the staff recommendation and to forward the item for Council approval.
Prepared by: Brenda Lopez, Interim Housing Director
ATTACHMENTS
1. Attachment 1 - Citizen Participation Plan
2. Attachment 2 - Regional Consolidated Plan
3. Attachment 3 - Regional Analysis of Impediments
4. Attachment 4 - 2025-26 Annual Action Plan
5. Attachment 5 - Applications List
6. Attachment 6 - Funding Recommendations
7. Attachment 7 - Powerpoint Presentation
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
2025-2029 Consolidated Plan
DRAFT - April 2025
2025-2029 Action Plan
316
Ventura County Regional Consolidated
Plan
Table of Contents
Executive Summary......................................................................................................... Section 1 Process .......................................................................................................................... Section 2 Needs Assessment ......................................................................................................... Section 3 Market Analysis............................................................................................................... Section 4 Strategic Plan.................................................................................................................. Section 5 Stakeholder Invitations..................................................................................................Appendix 1 Resident Survey Results ................................................................................................Appendix 2 317
Section 1:
Executive Summary
318
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Executive Summary - 1 Executive Summary
ES-05 Executive Summary – 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b)
The Ventura County Regional Five-Year Consolidated Plan (the Consolidated Plan) is a collaborative document between all incorporated cities and the unincorporated areas of Ventura County, California. Collaborating in the development of the Consolidated Plan are the Cities of Camarillo, Fillmore, Moorpark, Ojai, Oxnard, Port Hueneme, Santa Paula, San Buenaventura (City of Ventura), Simi Valley, and Thousand Oaks. The County of Ventura (County) is the lead agency in the development of this Consolidated Plan.
The Consolidated Plan is a means of assessing Ventura County’s affordable housing and community development needs; analyzing housing markets; articulating priorities, goals, and strategies to address identified needs; and describing the actions that will be taken to implement strategies for affordable housing and community development.
The Consolidated Plan is mandated by federal law and regulations promulgated by the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to receive federal funding for affordable housing and community development initiatives benefitting primarily low- and moderate-income persons. This Consolidated Plan consolidates into a single document the planning and application requirements for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership (HOME), and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) programs.
This Consolidated Plan is for the following HUD funded programs for the 2025-2029 period.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG): CDBG provides annual grants on a formula basis to states, cities, and counties to develop viable urban communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment, and by expanding economic opportunities, principally for lowand moderate-income persons.
HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME): HOME funds a wide range of activities including building, buying, and/or rehabilitating affordable housing for rent or homeownership or providing direct rental assistance to low-income people.
Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG): ESG assists people with quickly regaining stability in permanent housing after experiencing a housing crisis and/or homelessness.
Jurisdiction Community
Development Block
Grant (CDBG)
HOME Investment
Partnerships
Program (HOME)
Emergency Solutions
Grant (ESG)
Camarillo X *
Oxnard X X X
San Buenaventura X X
Simi Valley X *
319
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Executive Summary - 2 Thousand Oaks X *
Ventura Urban
County
X X
Table ES-1: Entitlement Grant Allocation
*Camarillo, Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks are members of the Ventura Urban County HOME Consortium and receive HOME funds through the County.
Throughout this document the following geographic terms will be used:
• Ventura County: Includes the entirety of the planning area considered under this Consolidated Plan: the 10 incorporated cities of Camarillo, Fillmore, Moorpark, Ojai, Oxnard, Port Hueneme, San Buenaventura, Santa Paula, Simi Valley, and Thousand Oaks, and unincorporated areas of Ventura County. Also identical to the Oxnard-Thousand OaksVentura Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). • Ventura Urban County: A multi-jurisdictional Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement, made up of the cities of Fillmore, Moorpark, Ojai, Port Hueneme, Santa Paula, and unincorporated areas of Ventura County. Ventura County is the “lead entity” and official U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Entitlement Jurisdiction for Ventura Urban County.
• Unincorporated County: Includes all unincorporated areas of Ventura County (areas not part of any municipalities).
• Entitlement Jurisdictions: The entitlement jurisdictions receive and manage their own CDBG funding from HUD. They are the cities of Camarillo, Oxnard, San Buenaventura, Simi Valley, and Thousand Oaks, and the Ventura Urban County. • San Buenaventura: Also called “City of Ventura.” “San Buenaventura” is the official (legal) name of the city used by both local and federal government for ordinances, legal matters, U.S. Census Data, and HUD.
The following terms are used within the Consolidated Plan:
• HAMFI: HUD Area Median Family Income. The median family income calculated by HUD for each jurisdiction to determine Fair Market Rents income limits for HUD programs. HAMFI will not necessarily be the same as other calculations of median incomes (like the U.S.
Census).
• Household: All people living in a housing unit. Members of a household can be related or unrelated.
• Housing Problems: Four housing problems as described in HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data: 1) housing unit lacks complete kitchen facilities; 2) housing unit lacks complete plumbing facilities; 3) household is overcrowded; and 4) household is cost burdened. A household is said to have a housing problem if they have any one or more of these four problems.
• LMI: Low- and Moderate-Income as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, a status determined by gross household income and family size. • Overcrowding: More than 1 person per room not including bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls, or half-rooms.
• Severe overcrowding: More than 1.5 persons per room not including bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls, or half-rooms.
• Cost burden: Monthly housing costs (including utilities) exceeding 30 percent of monthly income.
320
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Executive Summary - 3 • Severe cost burden: Monthly housing costs (including utilities) exceeding 50 percent of monthly income.
• Senior: Labeled “Elderly” by the U.S. Census Bureau and HUD. People aged 62 and up. “Frail elderly” within U.S. Census data are those aged 75 and up. • Disabled: Any one or more of four different physical or cognitive limitations: hearing or vision impairment, ambulatory limitation, cognitive limitation, or independent living limitation. Individuals may have more than one type of disability.
Ventura Urban County and the participating entitlement jurisdictions anticipate receiving the following grant amounts in the fiscal year 2025. Projections for the entire five-year period are noted; however, these projected amounts are expected to change based on federal allocations made annually and do not include anticipated program revenue or prior year funds.
Grantee FY2025 Projected Allocation FY2025 – FY2029 Projected Allocation
Ventura County CDBG: $1,428,843
HOME: $1,221,315
CDBG: $7,144,215
HOME:$ 6,106,575
Camarillo CDBG: $350,107 CDBG: $1,750,535
Oxnard CDBG: $2,100,000
HOME: $600,000
ESG: $200,000
CDBG: $10,500,000
HOME: $3,000,000
ESG: $1,000,000
San Buenaventura CDBG: $677,690
HOME: $393,672
CDBG: $3,388,450
HOME: $1,968,360
Simi Valley CDBG: $672,694 CDBG: $3,363,470
Thousand Oaks CDBG: $607,042 CDBG: $3,035,210
Table ES-2: Projected Allocations
The Consolidated Plan consists of the following sections:
• The Process describes the consultation and citizen participation process undertaken to collect information from residents and stakeholders on community conditions and needs. • The Needs Assessment analyzes needs related to affordable housing, special needs housing, community development, and homelessness.
• The Market Analysis examines demographics, the supply of affordable units, the regional housing market, and other conditions that impact community needs and the programs that address these needs.
• The Strategic Plan identifies specific goals for each jurisdiction based on the highest priority needs informed by the Needs Assessment, Market Analysis, and extensive consultation with community groups and citizens.
The plan will also include an Annual Action Plan for the first year of the Consolidated Plan for each of the entitlement jurisdictions, which will describe the planned investment of federal resources to implement specific activities that meet the year’s strategic goals. 321
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Executive Summary - 4 Goals
To develop the strategy contained in this Consolidated Plan for allocating and leveraging entitlement grants, the County used several methods to analyze its housing and community development needs, including surveying residents and stakeholders; analyzing U.S. Census, American Community Survey (ACS) and other economic and demographic data; and using information from various County offices and reports.
The County and entitlement jurisdictions have established the following goals:
1. Improve the supply of affordable housing
2. Increase and improve social services
3. Work to end homelessness
4. Create and maintain quality neighborhoods
5. Promote economic development
6. Effective administration
Evaluation of past performance
HUD’s Office of Community Planning and Development (CPD) seeks to support the development of communities that feature decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanded opportunities for Low- and Moderate-Income (LMI) populations. To ensure entitlement jurisdictions are striving to achieve that vision, HUD requires annual submissions of Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Reports (CAPERs).
During the last Consolidated Plan cycle (excluding the current program year), the entitlement jurisdictions in Ventura County have collectively achieved the following accomplishments:
FY2020 – FY2023 Accomplishments
Goal Goal Outcome Indicator # of Beneficiaries
Create quality neighborhoods Persons benefitting from
public facility and
infrastructure improvements
221,312
Enhance economic stability Businesses assisted
Jobs created/ retained
250
16 Improve supply of affordable
housing
Rental units rehabilitated
Homeowner housing added
Homeowner housing
rehabilitated
Direct financial assistance to
homebuyers
Housing code enforcement
341
5 168
9 4.893
322
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Executive Summary - 5 Increase social services Persons benefitting from
public services
Homeless person overnight
shelter
48,252
24 Work to end homelessness Rapid re-housing
Homeless person overnight
shelter
Homeless prevention
Persons benefiting from public
services
90 1,255
260
2,144
Table ES-3: FY2020 – FY2023 Accomplishment Summary
Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process As a part of the Consolidated Plan process, Ventura County conducted a public outreach campaign to gather resident and stakeholder feedback on housing and community development needs across the community. Such input from stakeholders – including community members, housing professionals, and service providers – enabled Entitlement Jurisdictions to more accurately capture and strengthen their assessment of community needs. Over a period of three months, community engagement efforts included eight community meetings, three stakeholder meetings and two surveys (one administered to residents and another to stakeholders), and a 30-day public review period. The following sections describe how each of these activities collected valuable information from the community and facilitated the development of this report.
Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them All public comments were accepted and incorporated into the Consolidated Plan. 323
Section 2:
Process
324
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Process - 1 Process
PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies – 24 CFR 91.200(b)
Describe agency/entity responsibilities for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.
The following agencies and entities are responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and for the administration of each grant program and funding source.
Role Name Department/Agency
Lead Agency Ventura County
CDBG Administrator Ventura County Community Development HOPWA Administrator Ventura County
HOME Administrator Ventura County Community Development ESG Administrator Ventura County Community Development
HOPWA-C Administrator
Table Process-1: Consolidated Plan Responsible Agencies and Entities The Ventura Regional Consolidated Plan includes the following programs:
• City of Camarillo CDBG Program – Community Development Department • City of Oxnard CDBG, HOME, and ESG Programs- Housing Department • City of Simi Valley CDBG Program – Environmental Services Department • City of Thousand Oaks CDBG Program – Community Development Department • City of San Buenaventura CDBG and HOME Programs – Community Development Department
• Ventura Urban County CDBG, HOME, and ESG Programs – Community Development Division of the County Executive Office
Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information
• City of Camarillo: James Fowler, Senior Planner, Community Development Department, 601 Carmen Drive, Camarillo, CA 93010, 805-388-5363.
• City of Oxnard, Denise Ledesma, Housing Department, 435 South D Street, Oxnard, CA 93030, 805-385-7493.
• City of San Buenaventura: Lee Sherman, Community Development Department, 501 Poli Street, Ventura, CA 93001, 805-654-7869.
• City of Simi Valley: Julia Ramirez, Environmental Services Department, 2929 Tapo Canyon Rd., Simi Valley, CA 93063, 805-583-6759.
• City of Thousand Oaks: Lynn Oshita Community Development Department, 2100 Thousand Oaks Blvd., Thousand Oaks, CA 91362, 805-449-2391.
• Ventura Urban County: Kimberlee Albers, Deputy Executive Officer,County Executive Office, 800 S. Victoria Ave., Ventura, CA 93009, 805-654-2455.
325
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Process - 2 PR-10 Consultation – 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(l)
Introduction
Part of the Consolidated Plan development process included a public outreach campaign to gather input from a diverse group of residents and stakeholders in Ventura County. Stakeholders included nonprofit organizations, affordable housing providers, service providers, government agencies, and advocacy organizations, all of whom work with low- and moderate-income members of the community. Outreach efforts are summarized in the Executive Summary and Citizen Participation sections of this report. A list of the stakeholders invited to participate in the Consolidated Plan process is provided in Appendix 1. The results of the survey are summarized in Appendix 2.
Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health, and service agencies (91.215(l).
To identify local and regional stakeholders, Ventura County and its participating jurisdictions began by reviewing and updating contact lists from prior Consolidated Planning efforts. During the current planning cycle, the County invited over 200 agencies to participate in the planning process. These included:
• Service providers that address the needs of low- and moderate-income households as well as targeted populations such as persons with special needs or disabilities; • Affordable housing providers;
• Housing advocates;
• Housing professionals;
• Public agencies (such as school districts, health services, public works); • Economic development and employment organizations; and • Community and neighborhood groups.
Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly homeless individuals and families, families, with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness.
Ventura County coordinated with homeless service agencies across the Ventura County Continuum of Care Alliance in an effort to better address the needs of homeless populations. Consultation with the Continuum of Care provided valuable information on homelessness and available resources in the region. Several agencies and organizations that provided housing and/or supportive services for homeless populations also attended focus group workshops and community meetings.
Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction’s area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies, and procedures for the administration of HMIS.
Ventura County and its participating entitlement jurisdictions will consult the Continuum of Care when determining funding priorities to guide the review of applications received during the annual 326
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Process - 3 request for proposals. Through the course of the Consolidated Plan cycle, Ventura County and its participating entitlement jurisdictions will seek regular input and feedback from the CoC to ensure that activities and outcomes are aligned and coordinated.
Identify any agency types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting.
Ventura County and its participating jurisdictions contacted over 200 agencies in its public outreach efforts and consulted all applicable agency types. No applicable agency types were intentionally excluded in this process.
Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan.
Name of Plan
Lead
Organization
How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan?
Continuum of Care Continuum of
Care Alliance
The Ventura County Continuum of Care consists of a Board of Directors established consistent with 24 CFR 578.5(b), with broad representation from government, homeless service providers, emergency response, health care, housing providers, business community, faith community, and homeless/formerly homeless persons. The Continuum of Care Alliance, a collaborative group dedicated to promoting a safe, desirable and thriving community, works to garner communitywide commitment to preventing and ending homelessness in all parts of the region. The CoC recommends allocations of federal and state resources to address homelessness, which complements priority objectives identified in this Regional Consolidated Plan.
Ventura County
Homelessness Plan
Continuum of
Care Alliance
Establishes core requirements, practices and recommendations to end homelessness in Ventura County.
Housing Elements Camarillo,
Oxnard, San
Buenaventura,
Simi Valley,
Thousand Oaks,
Ventura County
The Consolidated Plan goals were compared to the goals and objectives of the Housing Elements for each jurisdiction to ensure that there were consistent objectives in promoting activities for low- and moderate-income communities.
Table Process-2: Other Planning Efforts Considered
Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(l)).
Ventura County consulted each participating jurisdiction in the Regional Consolidated Plan to gather local housing and community development needs for the next five years. The Ventura County Continuum of Care is a collaboration of city, county, and public agency staff, private nonprofit organizations, and community organizations. The County Executive Office of the County of Ventura is the Collaborative Applicant for Continuum of Care funding within the County. As required by the CoC Interim Rule, a CoC Governance Structure has been established, and is staffed by the Collaborative Applicant. The governance structure includes a governing Board, CoC Committee, 327
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Process - 4 four Standing Committees, and working groups as needed. One of these committees, the Data Performance and Evaluation committee, is tasked with developing performance standards, policies, and procedures for provision of homeless services in the Continuum. Part of these efforts include consultation with service providers and organizations such as the National Alliance to End Homelessness, and HUD.
Furthermore, the Housing Authorities within the County collaborate with health and social service agencies to provide additional or expanded services for target populations. The Housing Authorities also participate in Continuum of Care planning and subcommittee meetings with service providers. 328
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Process - 5 PR-15 Citizen Participation - 91.105, 91.200 ( c )
Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation.
Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting As a part of the Consolidated Plan process, Ventura County conducted a public outreach campaign to gather resident and stakeholder feedback on housing and community development needs across the community. Such input from stakeholders – including community members, housing professionals, and service providers – enabled Entitlement Jurisdictions to more accurately capture and strengthen their assessment of community needs. Over a period of three months, community engagement efforts included eight community meetings, three stakeholder meetings and two surveys (one administered to residents and another to stakeholders), and a 30-day public review period. The following sections describe how each of these activities collected valuable information from the community and facilitated the development of this report.
All meetings included translation services and the survey was presented in English and Spanish.
In addition, the County’s public outreach campaign included a general public relations component in which the following informational materials were made publicly available to encourage public participation:
• A project web page hosted by Ventura County
• Public meeting and survey notices via paper flyers and Internet social media Citizen Participation Outreach Methods
Sort
Order
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/attendance
Summary of
comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL (If
applicable)
1 Community
Meeting
Camarillo
(10/7/24)
General Public Participants included
residents of Camarillo
and the surrounding
communities in the
region.
Feedback and
recommendations
were provided on
housing and
community
development needs.
All
comments
received
were
accepted.
329
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Process - 6 Sort
Order
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/attendance
Summary of
comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL (If
applicable)
2 Community
Meeting San
Buenaventura
(10/8/24)
General Public Participants included
residents of San
Buenaventura and the
surrounding communities
in the region.
Feedback and
recommendations
were provided on
housing and
community
development needs.
All
comments
received
were
accepted.
3 Community
Meeting Santa
Paula (10/9/24)
General Public Participants included
residents of Santa Paula
and the surrounding
communities in the
region.
Feedback and
recommendations
were provided on
housing and
community
development needs.
All
comments
received
were
accepted.
4 Community
Meeting Simi
Valley
(10/10/24)
General Public Participants included
residents of Simi Valley
and the surrounding
communities in the
region.
Feedback and
recommendations
were provided on
housing and
community
development needs.
All
comments
received
were
accepted.
5 Community
Meeting
Thousand Oaks
(10/10/24)
General Public Participants included
residents of Thousand
Oaks and the surrounding
communities in the
region.
Feedback and
recommendations
were provided on
housing and
community
development needs.
All
comments
received
were
accepted.
6 Community
Meeting
Ventura Oxnard
(10/17/24)
General Public Participants included
residents of Oxnard and
the surrounding
communities in the
region.
Feedback and
recommendations
were provided on
housing and
community
development needs.
All
comments
received
were
accepted.
7 Community
Meeting Virtual
(10/18/24)
General Public Participants included
residents of the Ventura
County region
Feedback and
recommendations
were provided on
housing and
community
development needs.
All
comments
received
were
accepted.
330
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Process - 7 Sort
Order
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/attendance
Summary of
comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL (If
applicable)
8 Community
Meeting Virtual
(10/19/24)
General Public Participants included
residents of the Ventura
County region
Feedback and
recommendations
were provided on
housing and
community
development needs.
All
comments
received
were
accepted.
9 Community
Meeting
Camarillo
(10/29/24)
General Public Participants included
residents of Camarillo
and the surrounding
communities in the
region.
Feedback and
recommendations
were provided on
housing and
community
development needs.
All
comments
received
were
accepted.
10 Community
Meeting
Thousand Oaks
(11/21/24)
General Public Participants included
residents of Thousand
Oaks and the surrounding
communities in the
region.
Feedback and
recommendations
were provided on
housing and
community
development needs.
All
comments
received
were
accepted.
11 Community
Meeting Oxnard
(12/18/24)
General Public Participants included
residents of Oxnard and
the surrounding
communities in the
region.
Feedback and
recommendations
were provided on
housing and
community
development needs.
All
comments
received
were
accepted.
12 Stakeholder
Meeting
(remote)
(10/23/24)
Stakeholders Participants included
local housing and
community development
stakeholders
Feedback and
recommendations
were provided on
housing and
community
development needs.
All
comments
received
were
accepted.
13 Stakeholder
Meeting
(remote)
(10/25/24)
Stakeholders Participants included
local housing and
community development
stakeholders
Feedback and
recommendations
were provided on
housing and
community
development needs.
All
comments
received
were
accepted.
331
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Process - 8 Sort
Order
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/attendance
Summary of
comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL (If
applicable)
14 Stakeholder
Meeting
(remote)
(10/29/24)
Stakeholders Participants included
local housing and
community development
stakeholders
Feedback and
recommendations
were provided on
housing and
community
development needs.
All
comments
received
were
accepted.
15 Resident Survey General Public A total of 292 survey responses were
completed
Feedback and
recommendations
were provided on
housing and
community
development needs.
All
comments
received
were
accepted.
16 Stakeholder
Survey
Stakeholders A total of 27 survey
responses were
completed
Feedback and
recommendations
were provided on
housing and
community
development needs.
All
comments
received
were
accepted.
Table Process-3: Citizen Outreach Methods
332
Section 3
Needs Assessment
333
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 1 Needs Assessment
NA-05 Overview
Needs Assessment Overview
The Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment examines housing, homelessness, non-homeless special needs, and non-housing community development needs. The housing needs assessment section evaluates household income, tenure (renter or owner), housing cost as a function of household income, disproportionate need amongst racial and ethnic groups, and public housing needs. The homeless needs assessment examines the sheltered and unsheltered homeless population in Ventura County to form the region’s strategy to address homelessness during the next five years. The non-homeless special needs assessment section evaluates the needs of subpopulations who are not homeless and due to various reasons, need services. This includes people who are elderly, frail and elderly, have severe mental illness, developmental and/or physical disability, alcohol or other drug addictions, HIV/AIDS, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and who have suffered human trafficking and domestic violence. The non-housing community development needs assessment section discusses the need for public facilities, public infrastructure improvements and public services to benefit low- and moderate-income residents.
Methodology
To assess community needs, the region examined data, held community meetings, conducted a survey of residents and local stakeholders, and consulted with experts and local stakeholders. The Needs Assessment primarily relies on the sources of data which follow:
- American Community Survey (ACS) 2020 5-year estimates - Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) 2016-2020 - 2025 Point-In-Time Homeless Count
The 2020 ACS and CHAS 5-year estimates were the most recent available complete datasets available from both sources.
The majority of the data presented in the Needs Assessment and Market Analysis provides a summary of the data at the regional level. Appendix 3 provide jurisdictional data for each entitlement jurisdiction in the Ventura County region.
Consolidated Plan Survey for Residents and Stakeholders Ventura County residents and stakeholders had the opportunity to respond to the Community Needs survey to rate the level need for public facilities, infrastructure, public and neighborhood services, and housing facilities and services. The survey provided insight into internet access and disaster preparedness. Additionally, organizations that work with residents of Ventura County with low- and moderate-incomes, special needs, and those experiencing or at-risk of experiencing homelessness were given the opportunity to share their thoughts on the most effective community development 334
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 2 projects from the last Consolidated Planning cycle and high priorities in housing, community, or economic development over the next five years. The tabulation of survey results from 292 residents and 27 stakeholders who responded to the survey are integrated throughout the Needs Assessment (NA) and Market Analysis (MA) of Consolidated Plan and can be found in the following sections:
- Housing facility and service results – NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment, and - Public facility, infrastructure, and service results – NA-50 Non-Housing and Community Development Needs.
335
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 3 NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment
Summary of Housing Needs
According to Table NA-2, Ventura County’s population rose by two percent, from 823,318 to 843,843, between 2010 and 2020. Of the jurisdictions within the region, the fastest growing community was the City of Camarillo (growing by 8% during this time period) and the slowest growing community was Thousand Oaks (growing by 1% during the same period). During this time, the number of households across the region rose by three percent from 264,305 to 271,639 and the nominal median household income increased 19 percent from $75,348 to $89,295.
HUD programming is largely allocated to programs targeting households earning 80% of the area median income (based on family size). In 2024, for a 4-person household, 80% of the area median income is $112,550. According to 2023 Bureau of Labor Statistics wage data, this 80% figure exceeds a number of jobs such as those listed below:
Occupation Title Annual Mean Wage (2023)
Dental Hygienist $110,600
Farm/Agriculture Manager $109,690
Elementary School Teacher $102,960
Construction Supervisor $88,240
Firefighter $83,250
Electrician $76,040
Carpenter $67,890
Chef/ Head Cook $64,070
Table NA-1: Ventura County Wage Examples
The Number of Households table illustrates household types in the County by levels of income.
Small family households consist of two to four family members, while large family households have five or more persons. The income levels correspond with HUD area median income (AMI) definitions.
The Households graph shows how many households are in each income category. 336
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 4 Figure NA-1 – Households by Income
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
The most common household type in Ventura County and in each respective jurisdiction is small family households, representing 44% of all households in the region. Over 47% of all households in Ventura County earn at or below 80% AMI (low- or moderate-income households). This is a slightly greater share of low- and moderate-income households when compared to Camarillo (40%), Simi Valley (41%), and Thousand Oaks (38%), while a slightly lower share than Oxnard (60%) and San Buenaventura (51%).
In this section there are six tables of data which reference housing problems. Housing problems are defined by HUD as follows:
1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household lacks a sink with piped water, a range or stove, or a refrigerator.
2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household lacks hot and cold piped water, a flush toilet and a bathtub or shower.
3. Overcrowding / severe overcrowding: A household is overcrowded if there are more than 1.01 people per room, excluding bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls, or half-rooms. A household is considered severely overcrowded if there are more than 1.5 people per room.
4. Cost burden / severe cost burden: A cost burdened household pays more than 30 percent of its total gross income for housing costs. A severely cost burdened household pays more than 50 percent of its total income for housing costs. Renter’s housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. Owner’s housing costs include mortgage, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
This collection of data makes clear housing cost burden greater than 30% is the most common housing problem across renter and owner households; and renter households are most impacted by severe housing problems. About 54% of the 127,825 low- or moderate-income households 39,125 35,615 53,085 29,930 113,885
HAFMI
VENTURA COUNTY HOUSEHOLDS
0-30% >30-50% >50-80% >80-100% >100%
337
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 5 experience a housing cost burden over 30% of income. Approximately 43% of the 54,700 households in the same income bracket with one or more severe housing problem are renters.
Demographics Base Year (2005-2009) Most Recent Year (2016-2020) % Change Population 823,318 843,843 2.5%
Households 264,305 271,639 2.8%
Median Income $75,348 $89,295 18.5%
Table NA-2: Housing Needs Assessment Demographics
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS (Base Year), 2016-2020 ACS (Most Recent Year) 0-30%
AMI
>30-50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
>80-100%
AMI
>100%
AMI
Total Households 39,125 35,615 53,085 29,930 113,885
Small Family Households 10,710 13,835 22,190 13,000 59,495 Large Family Households 4,030 4,395 8,345 3,910 12,175
Household contains at least one
person 62-74 years of age
9,775 8,720 12,935 7,890 30,230
Household contains at least one
person age 75 or older
9,065 7,250 7,790 3,445 10,280
Households with one or more children
6 years old or younger
5,770 6,015 6,115 6,125 5,860
Table NA-3: Number of Households Table
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
338
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 6 Housing Needs Summary Tables
Renter Households Owner Households
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total
Substandard
Housing - Lacking
complete plumbing
or kitchen facilities
1,150 410 495 105 2,160 90 100 90 90 370
Severely
Overcrowded -
With >1.51 people
per room (and
complete kitchen
and plumbing)
1,245 1,015 1,085 350 3,695 110 40 110 405 665
Overcrowded -
With 1.01-1.5
people per room
(and none of the
above problems)
1,980 2,045 1,885 670 6,580 520 195 520 1,450 2,685
Housing cost
burden greater
than 50% of
income (and none
of the above
problems)
12,485 6,905 2,215 185 21,790 5,390 8,950 5,390 4,445 24,175 Housing cost
burden greater
than 30% of
income (and none
of the above
problems)
2,605 5,655 9,715 3,570 21,545 3,605 1,955 3,605 8,610 17,775 Zero/negative
Income (and none
of the above
problems)
1,325 0 0 0 1,325 865 0 0 0 865
Table NA-4: Housing Problem 1 (Households with one of the listed needs) Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
339
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 7 Renter Households Owner Households
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total
Having 1 or
more of four
housing
problems
16,860 10,370 5,680 1,305 34,215 9,290 6,110 6,390 1,575 23,365 Having none
of four
housing
problems
7,375 8,170 17,740 9,265 42,550 5,600 10,960 23,275 17,780 57,615 Household
has negative
income, but
none of the
other housing
problems
1,325 0 0 0 1,325 865 0 0 0 865
Table NA-5: Housing Problem 2 (Households with one or more Severe Housing Problems: Lacks kitchen or complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, severe cost burden)
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Renter Households Owner Households
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total
Small Related 1,035 3,855 5,135 10,025 260 1,255 4,620 6,135 Large Related 755 1,575 1,365 3,695 1,255 675 1,255 3,185 Elderly 360 395 515 1,270 1,460 875 1,460 3,795
Other 495 1,150 2,750 4,395 860 145 860 1,865
Total need by income 2,645 6,975 9,765 19,385 3,835 2,950 8,195 14,980 Table NA-6: Housing Problem 3 (Cost Burden 30% - 50%)
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
340
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 8 Renter Households Owner Households
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Small Related 5,070 3,585 740 9,395 2,690 1,720 1,640 6,050 Large Related 2,220 620 60 2,900 495 345 320 1,160
Elderly 1,075 475 295 1,845 1,590 1,305 1,140 4,035
Other 3,395 1,800 985 6,180 960 595 635 2,190
Total need by income
11,760
6,480 2,080 20,320 5,735 3,965 3,735 13,435
Table NA-7: Housing Problem 3 (Cost Burden > 50%)
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Renter Households Owner Households
0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total
Single family households 2,870 2,360 1,915 435 7,580 115 360 1,085 375 1,935 Multiple, unrelated
family households
365 720 900 365 2,350 119 280 815 225 1,439
Other, non-family
households
55 80 215 60 410 0 0 0 0 0
Total need by income 3,290 3,160 3,030 860 10,340 234 640 1,900 600 3,374 Table NA-8: Housing Problem 4 (Crowding Information – More than one person per room) Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total
Households with
children 6 years of
age or younger
present
4,525 4,530 5,330 14,385 1,245 1,600 3,895 6,740
Table NA-9: Households with children under the age of 6 Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Describe the number and type of single person households in need of housing assistance.
The most common type of single person household in need of housing assistance are single person elderly households. These are often households living on a fixed income in either older owner341 Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 9 occupied households in need of rehabilitation or renting and at risk of not being able to afford annual rental increases.
According to the 2016-2020 ACS estimates approximately 10% households in Ventura County are over 65 years of age and living alone. In looking at income conditions of single households, the 2016- 2020 CHAS data estimates that more than 6,000 single-person households are low- or moderateincome and are cost burdened (paying more than 30% of their income for housing) and more than 8,000 single low- and moderate-income households pay more than half of their income on housing costs. Finally, according to 2016-2020 ACS estimates, 47% of all single households are renters.
Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking.
Domestic and dating violence, assault, and stalking are not always reported. According to the 2022 National Crime Victimization Survey, only 53% of all domestic violence events and 21% of rapes/ sexual assaults were reported to the police. The State of California Department of Justice maintains statistics on domestic violence calls to local law enforcement statewide by jurisdiction (openjustice.doj.ca.gov). In 2022, 1,307 calls related to domestic violence were made from Ventura County. Of these incidents:
- 52 involved a weapon
- one involved a firearm
- four involved a knife or cutting instruments
- eight involved other dangerous weapons
- 39 involved personal weapons (i.e., feet or hands)
There were at least 1,307 times during 2022 when a household was in need of some type of domestic violence services. In households where physical violence occurred, it is possible that at least one member of the household needed to relocate to escape recurring violence. These households may include children. Victims of domestic violence suffer in many ways including economically, which impacts access to safe and affordable permanent housing.
What are the most common housing problems?
The most common housing problem in the region is housing cost burden. The tables below summarize the number of households with one of four housing problems. Those problems are defined in the introduction to this section. The data shows 54% of low- or moderate-income households have a housing cost burden greater than 30%. Renter households bear the brunt of housing problems. The Most Prevalent Housing Problems graph shows renters are far more likely than owners to live in substandard housing or in crowded conditions. 342
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 10 Figure NA-2: Most Prevalent Housing Problems
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
The second most common housing problem is overcrowding, a calculated number which includes both overcrowded and severely overcrowded households, which affects 10,750 households with incomes up to 100% AMI. Renter households account for 86% of households with overcrowding.
Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these problems? Renter households are most impacted by severe housing problems as shown in the graph below.
These households have the greatest propensity to be severely cost burdened and overcrowded.
Small related households with low- and moderate-incomes are most impacted by housing cost burden. Renter households consisting of a single family (e.g., not inter-related or non-related families sharing a dwelling unit) are most impacted by overcrowding.
Approximately 27% of low- and moderate-income households (34,365 households) carry a housing cost burden of 30 to 50 percent. About 26% of households (33,755 households) at the same income level carry a severe cost burden of over 50 percent of their income. 9,255
1,495
39,580
28,895
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
<80% AMI
<80% AMI
VENTURA COUNTY RESIDENTS WITH <80%
AMI MOST PREVALENT HOUSING
PROBLEMS
SUBSTANDARD HOUSING CROWDING
HOUSING COST BURDEN >30% ZERO/NEGATIVE INCOME
343
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 11 Figure NA-2: Households With Most Severe Housing Problems Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Describe the characteristics and needs of low-income individuals and families with children (especially extremely low-income) who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c)). Also discuss the needs of formerly homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re-housing assistance and are nearing the termination of that assistance
Extremely low- (at or below 30 percent AMI) and low-income (more than 30 percent but at or below 50 percent AMI) households are presumed to be unstably housed, meaning they are at risk of falling into homelessness. Households with one or more housing problems at this income level are highly sensitive to adverse events. The greatest concentrations of unstably housed households are among small family households, small related renter households with a housing cost burden greater than 30 percent of their income, and renter households with at least one housing problem.
There are 74,740 households in Ventura County earning at or below 50 percent AMI, representing 28 percent of all households. While small related households are most impacted by housing cost burden, the graphs below show small and large related, elderly, and “other” households experience significant housing cost burden. “Other” households include single person households.
Renter households in this income range are about twice as likely than owner households to experience a housing cost burden of 30 to 50 percent of their income, and renter households are about two times more likely to experience a housing cost burden of greater than 50 percent of their income. Furthermore, 5,230 single family household renter households with incomes at or below 50 percent AMI are living in overcrowded conditions and could be presumed unstably housed.
RENTERS
WITH <80%
AMI
60%
(32,910)
OWNERS
WITH <80%
AMI
40%
(21,790)
VENTURA COUNTY
HOUSEHOLDS WITH
MOST SEVERE
HOUSING PROBLEMS
344
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 12 Figure NA-4: Households With >30-50% Cost Burden
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Figure NA-3: Households With >50% Cost Burden
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
As described in the Market Analysis, rental housing costs have risen steadily over the past 10 years – creating more pressure on extremely low-income households. The ACS data shows the median contract rent in Ventura County increased 33 percent from 2010 to 2020. As rental prices continue to rise throughout Ventura County, the pressure on extremely low-income households will continue to increase.
Rapid rehousing programs may help homeless individuals and families but, unless a housing unit is within a subsidized affordable housing development, formerly homeless families and individuals receiving rapid rehousing assistance face considerable uncertainty with respect to their monthly 4,890
1,515
2,330
1,930
755
2,335
1,645
1,005
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
<50% AMI
<50% AMI
VENTURA COUNTY
HOUSEHOLDS WITH >30% COST BURDEN
SMALL RELATED
LARGE RELATED
ELDERLY
OTHER
8,655
4,410
2,840
840
1,550
2,895
5,195
1,555
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
<50% AMI
<50% AMI
VENTURA COUNTY HOUSEHOLDS
WITH >50% COST BURDEN
SMALL RELATED
LARGE RELATED
ELDERLY
OTHER
345
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 13 housing costs and ability to remain stably housed at the end of the assistance contract. Near the termination of assistance, finding replacement housing is difficult for the same reasons it was difficult before becoming homeless: high housing cost and the possibility of an eviction record.
If a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at-risk population(s), it should also include a description of the operational definition of the at-risk group and the methodology used to generate the estimates
The assessment of at-risk populations described in the foregoing paragraphs in this Consolidated Plan is based on ACS and CHAS data using HUD definitions for household types and housing problems, supplemented by available local data for certain groups specified by HUD, such as households with children and victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking.
Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness
There are 18,240 renter households who earn at or below 50 percent AMI and are severely cost burdened, according the CHAS data (see Table 6). Of these households:
• 8,655 are small, related households with four or fewer members • 2,840 are large, related households with five or more members • 1,550 are elderly households with one or more members over the age of 62 • 5,195 are other households
These extremely low- and low-income households are considered the most at risk of becoming homeless. This need is exasperated by the rising cost of housing compared to the wage gap for an entry level job position. According to 2023 Bureau of Labor Statistics data, the annual mean salary for a fast food worker or home health aide is approximately $35,000, equating to a monthly salary just below $3,000. Comparatively, according to Zumper Research, the median 1-bedroom apartment leased for approximately $2,265 in the County – an unattainable rent for most entry level positions. This gap has continued to grow over the past 5 years – creating even more pressure on extremely low- and low-income households in the region.
Discussion
According to the housing problem tables above, of households with incomes at or below 50 percent AMI, 37% are cost burdened renters, and one percent are crowded renters. Of households with incomes at or below 30 percent AMI, 39% are severely cost burdened renters and one percent are crowded renters. These households are presumed to be most at risk of becoming homeless. 346
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 14 NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems Introduction
Sections NA-15, NA-20, and NA-25 of the Needs Assessment examine housing problems experienced by racial or ethnic groups and identifies when a need is experienced at a disproportionately greater frequency. A disproportionately greater need exists when members of a group in an income range experience housing problems at a greater rate (10 percentage points or more) than all households within that income level. For example, when evaluating households with incomes at or below 30 percent AMI, if 50 percent of the households experience a housing problem, but 60 percent or more of a group experience housing problems, that group has a disproportionately greater need. Please note as part of the CHAS data set HUD did not calculate households with no/negative income, but one or more of the other housing problems by race or ethnicity for the 2016- 2020 period.
Housing problems and severe housing problems analyzed in sections NA-15 and NA-20 are based on the definitions that follow:
1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household lacks a sink with piped water, a range or stove, or a refrigerator.
2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household lacks hot and cold piped water, a flush toilet and a bathtub or shower.
3. Overcrowding: Household with more than 1.01 people per room.
4. Cost burden: Household pays more than 30 percent of its total gross income for housing costs. For renters, this includes rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, this includes mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
According to the 2016-2020 ACS, most residents identify ethnically as not Hispanic or Latino and most residents identify racially, excluding Hispanic ethnicity, as White, followed by Hispanic or Latino, Asian, two or more races, Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, some other race, and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander.
Housing Problems Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has no/negative
income, but none of the
other housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 30,715 8,410 0
White 15,155 4,315 0
Black / African American 640 165 0
Asian 1,470 570 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 95 50 0
Pacific Islander 10 10 0
347
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 15 Hispanic 12,770 3,055 0
Table NA-10: Disproportionally Greater Need 0 - 30% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Housing Problems Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has no/negative
income, but none of the
other housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 25,740 9,870 0
White 11,425 5,400 0
Black / African American 410 49 0
Asian 1,130 480 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 35 40 0
Pacific Islander 25 79 0
Hispanic 12,290 3,715 0
Table NA-1: Disproportionally Greater Need 30 - 50% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
348
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 16 Housing Problems Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has no/negative
income, but none of the
other housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 30,395 22,690 0
White 15,155 11,830 0
Black / African American 555 240 0
Asian 1,705 940 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 10 34 0
Pacific Islander 65 4 0
Hispanic 12,375 9,365 0
Table NA-12: Disproportionally Greater Need 50 - 80% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Housing Problems Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has no/negative
income, but none of the
other housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 12,235 17,695 0
White 7,380 9,830 0
Black / African American 205 320 0
Asian 770 920 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 35 4 0
Pacific Islander 30 40 0
Hispanic 3,540 6,030 0
Table NA-13: Disproportionally Greater Need 80 - 100% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Discussion
The method of calculating disproportionate need sets different groups of different sizes on equal footing, making it possible for any outsized impact on groups to be identified. However, throughout the County and across different races and ethnicities, 79 percent of residents with one or more of four housing problems earn at or below 30 percent AMI and 72 percent of residents earn at or below 50 percent AMI. These are very high rates of need which require almost an entire sub-population to be in need for disproportional impact to register.
The analysis shows the following:
349
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 17 Figure NA-6: Disproportionate Need Across Households Earning <30% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Across households with incomes at or below 30 percent AMI there is no disproportionate concentration of those with one or more housing problem among households.
Figure NA-7: Disproportionate Need Across Households Earning 30-50% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Across households with incomes at least 30 percent but equal to or less than 50 percent AMI, there is a disproportionate concentration of those with one or more housing problems among households which identify racially or ethnically as follows: Black / African American. 350
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 18 Figure NA-8: Disproportionate Need Across Households Earning 50-80% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Across households with incomes ranging from more than 50 percent to at or below 80 percent AMI there is a disproportionate concentration of those with one or more housing problem among households which identify racially or ethnically as Black / African American and Pacific Islander.
Note that Pacific Islanders have an increased share of households with one or more of four housing problems, but the overall number of households experiencing a housing problem for this race or ethnicity is quite low and within the CHAS margin of error.
Figure NA-9: Disproportionate Need Across Households Earning 80-100% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Across households with incomes ranging from more than 80 to at or below 100 percent AMI, there is a disproportionate concentration of those with one or more housing problem among households which identify racially or ethnically as follows: American Indian, Alaska Native. 351
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 19 Note that American Indian, Alaska Native households have an increased share of households with one or more of four housing problems, but the overall number of households experiencing a housing problem for this race or ethnicity is quite low and within the CHAS margin of error. 352
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 20 NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems Introduction
Similar to the previous section, the Severe Housing Problems tables provide data to determine if disproportionate housing needs exist for any racial or ethnic group that experiences severe housing problems, which are defined as:
1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household does not have a stove/oven and refrigerator.
2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household does not have running water or modern toilets.
3. Severe overcrowding: A household is considered severely overcrowded if there are more than 1.5 people per room.
4. Severe cost burden: Household pays more than 50 percent of its total income for housing costs. Renter’s housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. Owner’s housing costs include mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
Please note as part of the CHAS data set HUD did not calculate households with no/ negative income, but one or more of the other housing problems by race or ethnicity for the 2016-2020 period.
Severe Housing Problems* Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has no/negative
income, but none of the
other housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 26,150 12,975 0
White 12,995 6,475 0
Black / African American 550 250 0
Asian 1,300 740 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 80 65 0
Pacific Islander 10 10 0
Hispanic 10,765 5,060 0
Table NA-2: Severe Housing Problems 0 - 30% AMI
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
353
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 21 Severe Housing Problems* Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has no/negative
income, but none of the
other housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 16,480 19,130 0
White 7,615 9,205 0
Black / African American 255 205 0
Asian 740 870 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 25 50 0
Pacific Islander 4 94 0
Hispanic 7,530 8,470 0
Table NA-15: Severe Housing Problems 30 - 50% AMI
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Severe Housing Problems* Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has no/negative
income, but none of the
other housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 12,070 41,015 0
White 5,760 21,225 0
Black / African American 210 585 0
Asian 590 2,060 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 45 0
Pacific Islander 25 45 0
Hispanic 5,350 16,395 0
Table 3 – Severe Housing Problems 50 - 80% AMI
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
354
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 22 Severe Housing Problems* Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has no/negative
income, but none of the
other housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 2,880 27,045 0
White 1,170 16,035 0
Black / African American 30 500 0
Asian 195 1,495 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 35 4 0
Pacific Islander 15 55 0
Hispanic 1,335 8,230 0
Table NA-47 – Severe Housing Problems 80 - 100% AMI
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Discussion
The analysis shows the following:
Figure NA-9: Disproportionate Need Across Households with Severe Housing Problems Earning <30% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Across households with incomes at or below 30 percent AMI, there is no disproportionate concentration of those with one or more severe housing problem among households. 355
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 23 Figure NA-10: Disproportionate Need Across Household with Severe Housing Problems Earning 30-50% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Across households with incomes more than 30 and at or below 50 percent AMI, range there is no disproportionate concentration of those with one or more severe housing problem.
Figure NA-11: Disproportionate Need Across Households with Severe Housing Problems Earning 50-80% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Across households with incomes more than 30 and at or below 50 percent AMI, there is a disproportionate concentration of those with one or more severe housing problem among households which identify racially or ethnically as follows: Pacific Islander. 356
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 24 Note that Pacific Islanders have an increased share of households with one or more of four severe housing problems, but the overall number of households experiencing a severe housing problem for this race or ethnicity is quite low and within the CHAS margin of error.
Figure NA-4: Disproportionate Need Across Households with Severe Housing Problems Earning 80-100% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Across households with incomes more than 80 and at or below 100 percent AMI, there is a disproportionate concentration of those with one or more severe housing problem among households which identify racially or ethnically as follows:
- American Indian, Alaska Native
- Pacific Islander
Note that Pacific Islander and American Indian, Alaska Native households have an increased share of one or more of the four severe housing problems, but the overall number of households experiencing a severe housing problem for this race or ethnicity is quite low and within the CHAS margin of error.
357
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 25 NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens Introduction
HUD defines cost burden as the extent to which gross housing costs, including utility costs, exceeds 30 percent of a given household’s gross income. A household is considered severely cost burdened if gross housing costs, including utility costs, exceed 50 percent of a household’s gross income.
Housing Cost Burden <=30% 30-50% >50% No / negative
income (not
computed)
Jurisdiction as a whole 165,515 56,520 47,230 2,380
White 99,120 29,885 27,120 1,230
Black / African American 2,285 905 1,020 30
Asian 12,795 3,170 2,410 135
American Indian, Alaska Native 490 45 105 50
Pacific Islander 365 130 10 0
Hispanic 46,495 21,270 15,650 880
Table NA-18: Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens AMI
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
358
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 26 Discussion
The analysis shows the following:
Figure NA-13: Disproportionate Need Across Households Cost Burdened 30-50% of Income Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Housing cost burdens equivalent to 30 to 50 percent of a household’s income is not experienced disproportionately.
Figure NA-14: Disproportionate Need Across Households Cost Burdened >50% of Income Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Housing cost burdens greater than 50 percent of a household’s income is not experienced disproportionately.
17% 24%
13% 15%
2%
19%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
WHITE BLACK /
AFRICAN
AMERICAN
ASIAN AMERICAN
INDIAN,
ALASKA
NATIVE
PACIFIC
ISLANDER
HISPANIC
>50% JURISDICTION AS A WHOLE 17%
VENTURA COUNTY DISPROPORTIONATE NEED
OF HOUSEHOLDS COST BURDENED >50% OF
INCOME
19% 21% 17%
7%
26% 25%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
WHITE BLACK /
AFRICAN
AMERICAN
ASIAN AMERICAN
INDIAN,
ALASKA
NATIVE
PACIFIC
ISLANDER
HISPANIC
30-50% JURISDICTION AS A WHOLE 21%
VENTURA COUNTY DISPROPORTIONATE NEED OF
HOUSEHOLDS COST BURDENED 30-50% OF
INCOME
359
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 27 NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion
Are there any income categories in which a racial or ethnic group has a disproportionately greater need than the needs of that income category as a whole? The following racial or ethnic groups were found to have a disproportionately greater level of housing problems relative to the percentage of all households in the given income category experiencing housing problems:
Income
Category
Camarillo Oxnard Simi
Valley
Thousand
Oaks
San
Buenaventura
Ventura County
0-30%
AMI
-Black/
African
America
n
-None -None -Black/
African
America
n
-America
n Indian,
Alaska
Native
-Asian
-American
Indian,
Alaska Native
-None
30-50%
AMI
-Hispani
c
-Black/Africa
n American
-American
Indian,
Alaska
Native
-Black/
African
America
n
-Pacific
Islander
-Black/
African
America
n
-Asian
-None -Black/African
American
50-80%
AMI
-Black/
AfricanAmerica
n
-Pacific
Islander
-Black/
African
America
n
-Asian
-None -Black/ African
American
-Black/African
American
-Pacific
Islander
80-100%
AMI
-Asian -Pacific
Islander
-None -Black/
African
America
n
-Asian
-American
Indian,
Alaska Native
-American
Indian, Alaska
Native
Table NA-19: Disproportionate Need – Housing Problem Summary The following racial or ethnic groups were found to have a disproportionately greater level of severe housing problems relative to the percentage of all households in the given income category experiencing severe housing problems:
Income
Category
Camarillo Oxnard Simi Valley Thousand
Oaks
San
Buenaventura
Ventura
County
360
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 28 0-30% AMI -Black/
African
American
-Asian
-None -Black/
African
American
-Black/
African
American
-American
Indian,
Alaska
Native
-American
Indian,
Alaska
Native
-None
30-50%
AMI
-Hispanic
-Asian
-American
Indian,
Alaska
Native
-None -Black/
African
American
-American
Indian,
Alaska
Native
-Black/
African
American
-None
50-80%
AMI
-None -Pacific
Islander
-Black/
African
American
-Black/
African
American
-Black/
African
American
-Pacific
Islander
80-100%
AMI
-None -None -Asian -Hispanic -Asian
-American
Indian,
Alaska
Native
-American
Indian,
Alaska
Native
-Pacific
Islander
Table NA-20: Disproportionate Need – Severe Housing Problem Summary The following racial or ethnic groups were found to have a disproportionately greater level of housing cost burden relative to the percentage of all households experiencing cost burden:
Level of
Cost
Burden
Camarillo Oxnard Simi Valley Thousand
Oaks
San
Buenaventura
Ventura
County
30-50% of
income
-Pacific
Islander
-None -None -Pacific
Islander
-None -None
Greater
than 50%
-None -None -Black/
African
American
-Black/
African
American
-Black/
African
American
-American
Indian,
Alaska
Native
-None
Table NA-21: Disproportionate Need – Cost Burden Summary 361
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 29 Are any of those racial or ethnic groups located in specific areas or neighborhoods in your community?
As identified in the Analysis of Impediments, there is a high concentration of Hispanic residents in Oxnard and the City of Santa Paula (as indicated by the volume of blue dots in these areas in the map below. Areas in the balance of the region are better integrated as indicated by the mixture of different colored dots.
362
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 30 NA-35 Public Housing
Introduction
Public housing and housing vouchers are a couple of Ventura County’s tools to address the affordable housing needs of extremely low- and very low-income families. There are multiple housing authorities active in the county. The Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura (AHACV) administer Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers and public housing in the cities of Camarillo, Fillmore, Moorpark, Ojai, Simi Valley, and Thousand Oaks as well as the unincorporated areas of the county. The cities of Ventura (Housing Authority of the City of San Buenaventura (HACSB)), Port Hueneme (Housing Authority of the City of Port Hueneme (PHHA)), Oxnard (Oxnard Housing Authority (OHA)), and Santa Paula (Housing Authority of the City of Santa Paula (SPHA)) operate their own public housing authorities independent of the AHACV. AHACV and OHA maintain a high-performer status with HUD. The tables in this section represent a consolidate summary of the public housing data for the inventories of all of the housing authorities operating in the county.
Program Type
Certificate ModRehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project
-based
Tenant
-
based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled
*
# of units
vouchers
in use
1826 5348 233 5038 43 21 0
Table NA-22: Public Housing by Program Type
Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition
Program Type
Race Certificate ModRehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project
-based
Tenant
-
based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled
*
White 1714 4765 213 4488 35 19
Black/
African
American 55 332 4 320 5 1
Asian 38 179 12 164 1 1
American
Indian/
Alaska
Native 16 50 2 47 1 0
363
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 31 Program Type
Race Certificate ModRehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project
-based
Tenant
-
based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled
*
Pacific
Islander 3 22 2 19 1 0
Other
Table NA-23: Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition 364
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 32 Program Type
Ethnicity Certificate ModRehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project
-based
Tenant
-
based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled
*
Hispanic 1145 2497 75 2400 9 8
Not
Hispanic 681 2851 158 2638 34 12
Table NA-24:Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Section 504 Needs Assessment: Describe the needs of public housing tenants and applicants on the waiting list for accessible units.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination based on disability in any program or activity that is conducted by federal agencies or that receives financial assistance from a federal agency. A housing provider may not deny or refuse to sell or rent to a person with a disability and may not impose application or qualification criteria, rental fees, or sales prices and rental or sales terms or conditions that are different than those required of, or provided to, persons who are not disabled. Further, housing providers may not require persons with disabilities to live only on certain floors, or to all live in one section of the housing. Housing providers may not refuse to make repairs and may not limit or deny someone with a disability access to recreational and other public and common use facilities, parking privileges, cleaning or janitorial services or any services that are made available to other residents.
The most common needs identified by public housing tenants and tenants are for additional bedrooms for home health aides or other care givers to provide assistance to the resident.
Most immediate needs of residents of Public Housing and Housing Choice voucher holders The greatest need of public housing residents and voucher holders is access to decent, affordable housing. The Area Housing Authority reported that the overall success rate of approved applicants leasing up is 68%. Of those leasing up, only 58% find housing within 60 days.
In addition to identifying housing units, the needs of public housing residents generally mirrors the needs of low-income residents within the region and seeking support for transportation, childcare, job training, food assistance, and healthcare assistance.
Discussion
The AHACV implements a variety of strategies to address the need for affordable housing. The core strategies include maximizing affordable housing opportunities through continuous program and management improvement and leveraging additional resources. 365
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 33 NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment
Introduction
There are four federally-defined categories under which individuals and families are considered homeless:
1) Literally Homeless – An individual or family:
a. Living unsheltered on the streets;
b. Living in a vehicle or other place not meant for habitation; c. Living in an emergency shelter or transitional housing program, including a motel/hotel paid by a charitable organization or government program; or d. Exiting an institution (resided 90 days or less and previously resided in one of the two items listed above).
2) Imminent Risk of Homelessness – An individual or family imminently losing their housing:
a. Housing will be lost within 14 days; and
b. Has no subsequent residence; and
c. Lacks resources and support network.
3) Homeless Under other Federal Statutes – An unaccompanied youth under the age of 25 or families with children and youth, who do not otherwise qualify as homeless under this definition, but who do meet all of the following:
a. Are defined as homeless under Section 387 of the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act (42 U.S.C. 5732a), Section 637 of the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9832), Section 41403 of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 14043e-2), Section 330(h) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254b(h)), Section 3 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2012), Section 17(b) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1786(b)), or Section 725 of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a); b. Have not had a lease, ownership interest, or occupancy agreement in permanent housing at any time during the 60 days immediately preceding the date of application for homeless assistance;
c. Have experienced persistent housing instability as measured by two or more moves during the 60-day period immediately preceding the date of applying for homeless assistance; and
d. Can be expected to continue in such status for an extended period of time because of chronic disabilities, chronic physical health or mental health conditions, substance addiction, histories of domestic violence or childhood abuse (including neglect), the presence of a child or youth with a disability, or two or more barriers to employment, which include the lack of a high school degree or General Education Development (GED), illiteracy, low English proficiency, a history of incarceration or detention for criminal activity, and a history of unstable employment.
4) Fleeing or Attempting to flee Domestic Violence – An individual or family:
a. Fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence situation, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, or other dangerous or life-threatening conditions that relate to violence against the individual or a family member; and
b. Has no subsequent residence; and
366
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 34 c. Lacks the resources and support network.
Population
# homeless on a given night # homeless each year # of days in homelessness
Sheltered Unsheltered Returning Becoming Exiting
to PH
Persons in
households with
adult(s) and
child(ren)
108 10
137 1208 408
210
Emergency
Shelter
224
Transitional
Housing
Persons in
households with
only children
1 0
Persons in
households with
only adults
520 1392
Chronically
homeless
individuals
364 678
Chronically
homeless families
24 5
Veterans 38 69
Unaccompanied
Transitional Age
Youth (ages 18-24)
26 49
Persons with
HIV/AIDS
7 9
Table NA-25: Homeless Needs Assessment
Data Source: 2024 Ventura County Homeless Count & Survey Report Data Source Comments: HUD Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance Programs Homeless Populations and Subpopulations PIT count
Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance for families with children and the families of veterans.
Families
Significant progress has been made in reducing family homelessness within Ventura County in the past five years. Cities report that the investment of COVID-19 resources have increased the housing opportunities and reduced the unsheltered population. However, resources continue to need to be allocated to assist homeless families in Ventura County, including additional affordable and supportive housing opportunities that target this population. There are homeless families with children in the county who are unsheltered, in emergency shelter, and in transitional shelter. This is exemplified by the number of families who are cost burdened or severely cost burdened and at risk of becoming homeless.
The 2024 Point in Time Count shows 317 persons in families, including 209 children under the age of 18, were counted in the 2024 Point in Time Count. This consists of 39 families in shelter, 69 families in transitional housing and 10 unsheltered families.
367
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 35 Veterans
The number of homeless veterans has remained relatively stable over the past 5 years (109 in the 2019 Point in Time Count compared to 107 in the 2024 Point in Time Count). However, the percentage of unsheltered veterans has decreased from 75% to 64% over the same period.
Resources continue to need to be allocated to provide targeted housing and wrap around services to veterans throughout the region.
Describe the Nature and Extent of Homelessness by Racial and Ethnic Group.
As summarized in the chart below, the race that experiences homelessness the most is White (73%), followed by multi-racial (19%) and Black/ African-American (6%).
Race Sheltered Unsheltered (optional)
Black or African American 64 72
White 334 680
Asian 10 16
American Indian or Alaska Native 19 22
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 1 5
Multiple Races 348 96
Ethnicity Sheltered Unsheltered (optional)
Hispanic 483 605
Not Hispanic 444 826
Table NA-26:Nature and Extent of Homelessness
Data Source: HUD Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance Programs Homeless Populations and Subpopulations When comparing this data to race data for the entire county, the share of Black individuals experiencing homeless is more than double the share of black individuals in the county. Likewise, the share of multi-racial individuals experiencing homelessness is more than 4 times the share of multi-racial individuals in the general public.
The share of Hispanic individuals experiencing homelessness in the county is approximately 46%, this is just two percentage points over the share of Hispanic individuals in the County as a whole.
Describe the Nature and Extent of Unsheltered and Sheltered Homelessness.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) defines “unsheltered” homelessness as “an individual or family who lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence, meaning: An individual or family with a primary nighttime residence that is a public or private place not designed for or ordinarily used as a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings.”
368
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 36 Approximately 60% of the total homeless population was unsheltered in 2024, a 12.4 percent reduction compared to the 2023 Point in Time Count. As demonstrated in the chart below, the percentage of unsheltered adults who became homeless for the first time during the prior year decreased from more than one third (39%) in 2023 to less than one fourth (17%) in 2024. Additional resources for homelessness prevention have been dedicated through the State of California and Ventura County Continuum of Care to provide rental assistance, utility assistance, and landlord engagement to provide more stability for households who were at risk of homelessness.
The Ventura County Continuum of Care homeless services system served 6,060 persons including 5,271 adults and 1,215 persons in families, including 759 children. A total of 3,284 referrals were made to programs including homeless prevention assistance, emergency shelter, transitional housing, and rapid re-housing. There are 40 participating partner agencies and organizations that provide homeless services and supports to those experiencing homelessness in Ventura County. 369
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 37 NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment
Introduction
Special needs populations consist of persons who are not homeless, but due to various reasons need services and supportive housing. Persons with special needs include the elderly, frail elderly, severely mentally ill, developmentally disabled, physically disabled, persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS, and victims of domestic violence.
Describe the characteristics of special needs populations in your community.
Elderly and Frail Elderly
HUD defines elderly as a person who is 62 years of age or older. A frail elderly person is an elderly person who is unable to perform at least three “activities of daily living” including eating, bathing, grooming, or home management activities. Generally, elderly people have lower incomes than the population at large. Based on 2016-2020 CHAS data of the 107,380 households containing at least one elderly person in Ventura County, 52 percent, or 55,535 households, earn at or below 80 percent of the AMI and may require public services to continue to live independently. ACS data from the same period shows 46,725 residents of Ventura County aged 65 and above have a disability. Of those people, 61 percent have cognitive difficulty, 47 percent have vision difficulty, and 40 percent have ambulatory difficulty.
Persons with Disabilities
HUD defines a disabled person as having a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activity. The obstacle to independent living for these adults is not only their disability, but also the lack of financial resources, often related to limited employment. Additionally, persons with disabilities have high health care costs, are dependent on supportive services, and may require accessibility modifications to accommodate their disability. Based on 2021, 1-year ACS estimate, of the total Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population age 18 and to 64 in Ventura County, an estimated 43,082 persons have a disability; 18,648 are employed; 3,262 are unemployed; and 21,172 are not part of the labor force.
Alcohol and Other Drug Addictions
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) is the federally funded institution established to disseminate information on mental disorders, including data on prevalence. Prevalence data is collected through the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) and is calculated for a two-year period. Unfortunately, the pandemic disrupted the method of survey delivery which has disrupted the data series. The most recent data set for the 2021-2022 period is only available at the state level.
In 2013-2014 NSDUH results found 8.27 percent of California residents aged 12 and over had experienced substance use disorder in the past year. The post-pandemic survey shows in 2021- 2022, 17.12 percent of California residents of the same age range had experienced the same disorder. This high degree of prevalence is consistent with national outcomes. 370
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 38
HIV/AIDS
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) weakens the immune system by destroying important cells which fight disease and infection. Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is the final stage of HIV. The Center for Disease Control’s (CDC) Atlas Plus program reported in Ventura County an estimated 55 were newly diagnosed during 2022 (https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/atlas/index.htm, accessed September 2024). New HIV diagnoses were most concentrated among people 25-34 years of age. For persons living with HIV/AIDS, access to affordable housing, supportive services, and quality health care is important to maintaining their health and well-being.
Victims of Domestic Violence
Domestic violence, assault, and stalking are not always reported. According to the 2022 National Crime Victimization Survey, only 53 percent of all domestic violence events and 21 percent of rapes/ sexual assaults were reported to the police. Domestic Violence includes, but is not limited to, felony or misdemeanor crimes of violence committed by a current or former spouse of the victim or by a person who is cohabitating with or has cohabited with the victim. In 2022, a total of 1,307 calls related to domestic violence were made from Ventura County (openjustice.doj.ca.gov, accessed September 2024). Of those 52 incidents involved a weapon. Those incidents breakdown as follows:
- one was with a firearm;
- four were with a knife or cutting instruments;
- eight were with other dangerous weapons; and
- 39 were with personal weapons.
What are the housing and supportive service needs of these populations and how are these needs determined?
Supportive services required for special needs populations include case management, medical or psychological counseling and supervision, childcare, transportation, and job training provided for the purpose of facilitating a person’s stability and independence. The range of these needs varies based on the specific characteristics of each population.
To determine the level of need and types of services needed by special needs populations, the County conducted a survey, consulted with local service providers, and reviewed ACS data and other federal and state data sources.
In general, for each population identified in this section, safe and stable housing is paramount to the delivery of other services and programs. The most commonly identified supportive service needs include mental health, access to healthcare, and transportation services.
In housing, accessibility modifications to accommodate persons with mobility disabilities may include, but are not limited to, wider doorways, no-step thresholds, installation of ramps, grab bars, lowered countertops, and accessible hardware. The needs of residents with sensory disabilities are different from those with mobility disabilities. Individuals with hearing disabilities require visual adaptations for such items as the telephone ringer, the doorbell, and smoke alarms. Residents who are blind may require tactile marking of changes in floor level and stair edges and braille markings on appliances and controls. People with low vision may require large print markings and displays, 371
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 39 Persons living with HIV/AIDS contrasting colors to distinguish changes in level or transition from one area to another, proper lighting, and reduced glare from lighting and windows.
In general, for persons with special needs, the high cost of living in Ventura County makes it difficult to maintain a stable residence. Often these segments of the population rely on support services from various Ventura County nonprofit organizations to avoid becoming homeless or institutionalized.
Discuss the size and characteristics of the population with HIV/AIDS and their families within the Eligible Metropolitan Statistical Area.
According to the CDC, at the end of 2021, 1.2 million people in the United States were HIV positive, and 35,716 were newly diagnosed the same year (cdc.gov, accessed September 2024). Ventura County CDC data shows the number of persons living with HIV has increased from 860 in 2013 to 1,244 in 2022
Figure NA-16: HIV Prevalence
Data Source: CDC Atlas Plus
In 2022, there were a reported 55 new HIV diagnoses in Ventura County. People aged 25-34 accounted for 40 percent, the greatest concentration of new cases. Of the newly diagnosed, 85 percent were male of whom most identified racially/ethnically as Hispanic/Latino.
Discussion
In addition to the elderly, frail elderly, severe mentally ill, developmentally disabled, physically disabled, persons with alcohol and other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS, and victims of domestic violence described above, two other subpopulations with special needs in VenturaCounty include victims of human trafficking and individuals with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).
Victims of Human Trafficking
372
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 40 Human trafficking is a crime that involves the forceful, fraudulent, or coercive methods of entrapping a person, real or perceived, to exploit them for financial gain. The exploitative nature can come in the form of labor services, involuntary servitude, enslavement, debt bondage or commercialized sex acts. Human trafficking is extremely difficult to track; there is no recent or reliable prevalence rate to report. In 2021 the National Human Trafficking Hotline received the most calls from California of all 50 states (https://humantraffickinghotline.org/ accessed December 2023). Of national cases reported to the hotline, the majority were for sex trafficking of adult women.
The U.S. Department of State Trafficking in Persons Report published in July 2022, reports victims of human trafficking are found in every state in the country and trafficked from every country in the world. Victims of human trafficking in the United States are most frequently trafficked from within the United States, Mexico, and Honduras. Trafficking in Persons reports “human trafficking patterns in the United States continued to reflect the living legacy of the systemic racism and colonization globalized during the transatlantic slave trade through chattel slavery and regional practices of Indigenous dispossession. Traffickers often target those who experience compounding forms of discrimination (such as discrimination because of one’s racial or ethnic group, gender identity, disability, or sexual orientation), experience violence (such as intimate partner or domestic violence) or interact with government run programs (such as the criminal justice system, runaway and homeless youth services, foster or institution care, and the immigration enforcement system.”) Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) explains PTSD can “develop after exposure to a potentially traumatic event that is beyond a typical stressor” and potential inducing events may include, but are not limited to, “violent personal assaults, natural or human-caused disasters, accidents, combat, and other forms of violence.” Symptoms of PTSD can be debilitating. The U.S.
Department of Veteran’s Affairs National Center for PTSD recognizes the disorder impacts populations inside and outside of the military, including families, children, and non-combatants. The National Center reports an estimated six percent of the population, eight percent of women and four percent of men, will have PTSD at some point in their lives. “Women are more likely to develop PTSD than men…in part due to the types of traumatic events that women are more likely to experience – such as sexual assault—compared to men.” Challenges these special needs populations and subpopulations face include low-income and high housing cost. This segment of the population also struggles for a decent quality of life that includes access to necessities, adequate food, clothing, and medical care.
Novel coronavirus COVID-19
COVID-19 caused a global pandemic. Its widespread impact on the United State began in March 2020. In the ensuing years, lives changed dramatically, from the impact of measures to prevent the spread of the disease – including stay-in-place orders, social distancing, mask wearing and vaccination – to death. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act allocated funds to respond to the public health emergency through HUD. National and global public health emergency status was lifted in May 2023; however, the virus is still present and active around the world.
373
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 41 NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Facilities and Improvements Non-housing community development covers a broad range of needs, including public facilities, infrastructure, transportation, human services, and neighborhood services. Within the six Entitlement Jurisdictions, these needs are primarily addressed by a broad range of funding sources, supplemented with targeted HUD funding. Existing local and regional plans helped identify needs and were complemented by resident surveys and stakeholder focus groups.
The region’s needs for public facilities and improvements include, but are not limited to, the following areas:
1. Streetscape Improvements: Increase prevalence of sidewalks and lighting to improve community walkability and access to community amenities and businesses.
2. Bike/ Pedestrian Trails: Expand the network of bicycle and pedestrian trails within the region to ensure bicycle rider safety and increased access within the county.
3. Community Centers: Maintain and increase senior, youth, and general community center improvements within low- and moderate-income areas to provide adequate community space to all community members.
4. Parks/ Greenspace: Maintain and expand park and recreation space throughout the county with an emphasis on expanding or improving park space in low- and moderate-income areas How were these needs determined?
Needs were determined through the consultation process in the following ways:
• In person and remote community meetings
• Community member survey responses
• Remote stakeholder meetings and interviews
• Stakeholder survey responses
• Review of plans and strategy documents developed by the County and the entitlement jurisdictions
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Services.
The most commonly identified public service needs include:
1. Senior Services
2. Youth Services
3. Childcare
4. Homeless Services
5. Transportation Services
6. Job Training
How were these needs determined?
Needs were determined through the consultation process in the following ways:
374
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 42 • In person and remote community meetings
• Community member survey responses
• Remote stakeholder meetings and interviews
• Stakeholder survey responses
• Review of plans and strategy documents developed by the County and the entitlement jurisdictions
375
Section 4:
Market Analysis
376
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 1 Housing Market Analysis
MA-05 Overview
Housing Market Analysis Overview
This section of the Consolidated Plan evaluates housing market conditions in Ventura County including housing supply, demand, condition, and cost. The type of tenure of housing in the Ventura County are mixed. Single, detached-structures and single, attached-structures structures are most common. Owner households occupy 63 percent of units.
The data shows the housing market in the region is relatively tight and many households, especially renter households, are experiencing a housing cost burden. From 2021 to 2023 the median value for homes in Ventura County increased by 10 percent, according to the Zillow Home Value Index. ACS data shows median contract rent increased 33 percent over the last 10 years. For many years monthly rent increased at a faster rate than household income. CHAS data shows 26 percent of households earning at or below 80 percent AMI experience a housing cost burden greater than 50 percent of income.
Figure MA-1: Change in Median Rent and Income
Source: 2016-2020 ACS
377
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 2 MA-10 Number of Housing Units
Introduction
According to 2016-2020 ACS data, 64 percent of the region’s housing stock is comprised of single, detached-structures housing. Structures with single, attached-structures represent the next greatest amount of housing at 12 percent. Mobile homes comprise the smallest portion of the housing stock in the region at one percent. According to the 2016-2020 ACS 5-year estimates, the gross number of housing units in the region increased by six percent from 283,581 in 2015 to 289,197 in 2020.
Most ownership housing units in Ventura County have two or three bedrooms (55 percent). In comparison, only one percent of the region’s rental housing is comprised of units with no bedrooms.
The tables below indicate the number of residential properties in the region by property type, unit size, and tenure.
Figure MA-2: Size of Units
Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Property Type Number %
1-unit detached structure 184,062 64%
1-unit, attached structure 34,263 12%
2-4 units 15,342 5%
5-19 units 24,793 9%
20 or more units 19,496 7%
Mobile Home, boat, RV, van, etc. 11,241 4%
Total 289,197 1
378
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 3 Table MA-1: Residential Properties by Unit Number
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Owners Renters
Number Percentage Number Percentage
No bedroom 525 0% 4,941 5%
1 bedroom 1,961 1% 21,561 22%
2 bedrooms 94,287 55% 60,421 61%
3 or more bedrooms 75,264 44% 12,679 13%
Total 172,037 1 99,602 1
Table MA-2: Unit Size by Tenure
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Describe the number and targeting (income level/type of family served) of units assisted with federal, state, and local programs.
Each jurisdiction tracks the status of affordable housing units, which were constructed or rehabilitated with a variety of federal, state and local subsidies, including but not limited to HOME, Housing Set-Aside, Housing Bond, or tax credit funds.
Provide an assessment of units expected to be lost from the affordable housing inventory for any reason, such as expiration of Section 8 contracts.
HUD requires the region to analyze federal, state and locally assisted housing units that may be lost from the region’s affordable housing stock. The expiration of affordability restrictions on government assisted rental units is the typical reason that affordable units convert to market rate and are “lost.” Much of the housing at-risk of conversion from affordable housing to market rate housing is predominantly reserved for lower income households.
Use restrictions, as defined by state law, means any federal, state, or local statute, regulation, ordinance, or contract which as a condition of receipt of any housing assistance, including a rental subsidy, mortgage subsidy, or mortgage insurance, to an assisted housing development, establishes maximum limitations on tenant income as a condition of eligibility for occupancy.
To maintain the existing affordable housing stock, the region may either attempt to preserve the existing assisted units or facilitate the development of new units. Each negotiation to preserve affordable units is unique in the sense that each project’s ownership interests, and economic needs will vary and the region’s resources may be insufficient to preserve all units when covenants do expire. Depending on the circumstances of each project that includes at-risk units, different options may be used to preserve or replace the units. Preservation options typically include: 1) transfer of units to nonprofit ownership; 2) provision of rental assistance to tenants using other funding sources; and 3) purchase of extended affordability covenants. In terms of replacement, the most direct option is the development of new affordable units with long-term covenants. 379
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 4 The table below summarizes the affordable housing properties that are expected to expire by 2029 within the region. It should be noted that some of the properties expiring soon are owned by nonprofit organizations or housing authorities and there is a high probability that affordability covenants will be extended for those properties.
Property
Name
Jurisdiction Rental/Owner Target
Population
# of Affordable
Units
Expected
Expiration
Date
Ponderosa
Village (55+)
Camarillo rental general 90 2029
Paseo El Prado
Apts.
Oxnard rental family 23 2023
Pacific Point
Apartments
Oxnard rental general 213 2027
Heritage Park
Apartments
Oxnard rental senior 195 2027
Arroyo Villas Thousand
Oaks
rental family 40 2025
Los Arboles Thousand
Oaks
rental family 43 2028
Corta Bella Thousand
Oaks
owner family 26 2025
Country Grove San
Buenaventura
owner general 146 2026
La Paloma San
Buenaventura
owner general 95 2025
Northbank
Greens
San
Buenaventura
owner general 148 2026
Seneca
Highlands
San
Buenaventura
owner general 46 2029
1300 Saratoga San
Buenaventura
rental general 3 2028
Kalorama
Apartments
San
Buenaventura
rental family 18 2028
Esseff Village
Apartments
Thousand
Oaks
rental permanent
supportive
housing
50 2029
Harvard Place
Apartments
Santa Paula rental general 40 2025
Stoll House
Apartments
Thousand
Oaks
11 general 11 2027
Table MA-3: Existing Affordable Housing Developments
380
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 5 Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population? According to 2016-2020 CHAS data, the current availability of housing units in Ventura County does not meet the needs of the population. There is a significant need for additional rental housing units of all sizes affordable to low- and moderate-income households. The Cost Burden tables in section NA-10 show 74,740 low-income households, of whom 9,620 are cost burdened renter households and 18,240 severely cost burdened renter households.
Describe the need for specific types of housing.
As described in the NA-10 section of this plan, there are 18,240 renter households earning at or below 50 percent AMI and experiencing severe housing cost burdened:
- 8,655 are small, related households with four or fewer members - 2,840 are large, related households with five or more members - 1,550 are elderly households with one or more members over age 62 - 5,195 are other/single person households
This breakdown by tenure, income, cost burden, and household type indicate a need for additional affordable units of all sizes in Ventura County.
Discussion
For decades, California’s housing market has been among the most expensive in the country, and those conditions persist today. Not only was renting expensive, but purchasing a home was also largely out of reach. To afford median market rent for a two-bedroom unit in Ventura County a household needed to earn $58.79 per hour or work 147 hours per week at minimum wage of $16 per hour, which equates to four full-time jobs. These calculations were made using the same method as the National Low Income Housing Coalition in the Out of Reach series and using market rate rent from Zumper. Market rate rents are significantly higher than fair market rents and more accurately reflect the experience low- and moderate-income households are facing.
Figure MA-3: Minimum Wage Affordability
Data Source: 2022 Zumper Research & CA Minimum Wage Data 381
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 6 MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing
Introduction
One of the most important factors in evaluating a community’s housing market is the cost of housing and whether the housing is affordable to households who live there or would like to live there. If housing costs are relatively high in comparison to household income, a correspondingly high prevalence of housing cost burden and overcrowding will typically occur.
The Housing Costs table indicates the median home value and contract rent (not including utility or other associated costs). These values are self-reported by residents through the ACS Survey and the data reflects the 5-year estimate for 2016-2020. Looking to more current housing sales and rental market data it becomes clear the cost of housing is growing rapidly year over year.
According to Zumper, from 2023 to 2024 median rents increased six percent for one-bedroom units, decreased two percent for two-bedroom units, and increased seven percent for three-bedroom units. ACS data shows median contract rent increased 33 percent from 2010 to 2020.
Median home values have increased significantly since the last Consolidated Planning process. In 2020, according to ACS data, median home values in Ventura County were seven percent higher than what they had been in 2010, during the mortgage-backed securities housing foreclosure crisis.
According to the Zillow home value index, from 2021 to 2023 value increased 10 percent from $753,022 to $830,163.
Figure MA-4: Median Home Value
Data Source: 2021-2023 Zillow Home Value Index Research Based on the reported housing costs, the Housing Affordability Table 7 indicates the number of units currently affordable to households at different levels of income. It is important to note that simply because a unit is affordable to residents at that income level, it does not necessarily mean that a household at that income level is occupying the unit. These “affordable” units are primarily units that were either purchased or leased in the past and the corresponding mortgage or rent payment has not “reset” to market rates. Thus, the more telling data regarding affordability is the rising cost of housing, especially when compared to the lower growing annual wages within the region.
Rental Housing Cost by Bedroom 2022 2023 2024 % Change
382
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 7 1-bedroom 2,128 2,144 2,265 6.4%
2-bedroom 2,880 2,899 2,822 -2.0%
3-bedroom 3,598 3,786 3,862 7.3%
Table MA-4: Rental Housing Costs
Data Source: Zumper Research (accessed September 2024)
Cost of Housing 2010 2020 % Change
Median Home Value 568,700 609,200 7%
Median Contract Rent 1,391 1,854 33%
Table MA-5: Cost of Housing
Data Source: 2010, 2016-2020 ACS (Most Recent Year)
Rent Paid Number Percentage
Less than $500 3,892 4.08%
$500-999 6,591 6.91%
$1,000-1,499 19,424 20.37%
$1,500-1,999 25,092 26.31%
$2,000 or more 40,380 42.34%
Total 95,379 100.0%
Table MA-6: Rent Paid
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Units affordable to Households at: Renter Owner
30% HAMFI 24,395 15,155
50% HAMFI 18,940 17,252
80% HAMFI 25,240 29,854
100% HAMFI 12,280 20,321
Total 80,855 82,582
Table MA-7: Housing Affordability
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
383
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 8 # of Bedrooms Efficiency
(no bedrooms)
1 bedroom 2
bedrooms
3 bedrooms
4 bedrooms
Fair Market Rent $1,507 $1,792 $2,218 $3,101 $3,655
High HOME Rent $1,406 $1,508 $1,812 $2,085 $2,306
Low HOME Rent $1,097 $1,176 $1,411 $1,630 $1,818
Table MA-8: Monthly Rent
Data Source: 2022 HUD FMR and HOME Rents
Is there sufficient housing for households at all income levels? No, there is not sufficient housing for households at all income levels. In consultation with housing developers and stakeholders, they consistently identified the rising cost of housing and lack of affordable housing as a primary issue in the community. Likewise, in the resident surveys and community meetings, residents consistently cited the lack of affordability in their communities and the concern that this problem is worsening since the COVID pandemic. Further, housing cost data indicates that housing costs are far outpacing wage growth and many perceived middle-income occupations struggle to afford a property within Ventura County without being cost burdened. For example, the BLS reported in 2023 that the mean wage for an elementary school teacher in Ventura County was $102,960. At this salary, the teacher would need to pay more than 30% of their salary to afford the average price for a 2-bedroom apartment in 2024 (table MA-4) at $2,880.
For example, based on interest rates in December 2024, an estimated mortgage for a property valued at $900,000 in Oxnard is $5,800 for a 3-bedroom house. Two wage earners both working as high school teachers would be cost burdened to afford this property, let alone save an adequate down payment for it.
How is affordability of housing likely to change considering changes to home values and/or rents?
Rental housing costs have increased steadily over the past ten years – creating more pressure on extremely low-income households. Median market rate rents exceed the Fair Market Rents for Ventura County and represent a significant burden for low- and moderate-income households struggling to remain housed. Median home sales prices increased 10 percent from $753,022 to $830,163 from 2021 to 2023 according to home value data supplied by Zillow. Based on this information and barring significant regional and national changes in economic conditions, the price of housing in Ventura County is forecast to continue increasing during the period of the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan.
How do HOME rents / Fair Market Rent compare to Area Median Rent? How might this impact your strategy to produce or preserve affordable housing? HOME rents and Fair Market Rents are significantly below the area median rent. This variation limits the effectiveness of some rental assistance programs that are bound by these HUD limits. This also highlights the rapid growth of market rate rents as they continue to outpace the HUD determined 384
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 9 rent amounts. This variance emphasizes the need for creating and preserving affordable housing throughout the region.
Figure MA-5: Rent Differentials
Data Source: 2022 HOME Rates, 2016-2020 5—estimates ACS, 2023 Zumper Research Discussion
Economic expansion over the last decade and a lag in production of new housing units in Southern California have created a housing economy that is overburdened. As a result, Ventura County households have become increasingly cost-burdened. Homeownership is out of reach to more than half of Ventura County’s households and a single person earning minimum wage cannot reasonably afford a two-bedroom rental apartment. A household would need to earn about $216,640 annually to reasonably afford a $845,246 home, which was the median home value in 2022 per the Zillow Home Value Index. The median household income in Ventura County in 2022 was about half that, $102,141. A household would need to earn about $115,200 annually to afford a two-bedroom rental in the region. A full-time minimum-wage employee will gross almost $30,000 annually. This is illustrated in the Housing Income graph (Figure MA-6).
385
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 10 Figure MA-6: Rental & Ownership Housing Income
Data Source: 2022 Zumper Research, 2022 Zillow Home Value Index & Mortgage Calculator, CA Minimum Wage Data, Freddie Mac 30 Year Fixed Interest Rate Mortgage Data
386
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 11 MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing – 91.210(a) Introduction
Assessing the age and physical condition of housing in Ventura County forms the basis of strategies to maintain and improve housing quality for low- and moderate-income residents. For this assessment, the ACS defines a “selected condition” as owner- or renter-occupied housing units with at least one of the following conditions: 1) lacking complete plumbing facilities; 2) lacking complete kitchen facilities; 3) more than one occupant per room; and 4) selected monthly housing costs greater than 30 percent of household income. Just about half of both renter- and owneroccupied units have one or two selected conditions.
Figure MA-7: Year Unit Built
Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Definitions
Substandard housing is housing that does not meet the minimum standards contained in the State Housing Code (i.e., does not provide shelter, endangers health, safety or well-being of occupants).
A substandard condition is one that adversely affects habitability of the housing unit. As defined by California Health and Safety Code §17920.3, a substandard condition exists to the extent that it endangers the health and safety of its occupants or the public. Such conditions include:
- Inadequate sanitation
- Structural hazards
- Any nuisance that endangers the health and safety of the occupants or the public - All substandard plumbing, wiring, and/or mechanical equipment, unless it conformed to all applicable laws in effect at the time of installation and has been maintained in a good and safe condition
- Faulty weather protection
- The use of construction materials not allowed or approved by the health and safety code 387
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 12 - Fire, health and safety hazards (as determined by the appropriate fire or health official) - Lack of, or inadequate fire-resistive construction or fire-extinguishing systems as required by the health and safety code, unless the construction and/or systems conformed to all applicable laws in effect at the time of construction and/or installation and adequately maintained
- Inadequate structural resistance to horizontal forces - Buildings or portions thereof occupied for living, sleeping, cooking, or dining purposes that were not designed or intended to be used for such occupancies - Inadequate maintenance that causes a building or any portion thereof to be declared unsafe Standard housing condition in Ventura County is defined as housing that meets the minimum standards of the State Housing Code. For the purposes of the CDBG program, a unit in substandard condition is considered suitable for rehabilitation provided the unit is structurally sound, and the cost of rehabilitation is considered economically warranted.
Condition of Units Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number Percentage Number Percentage
With one selected Condition 53,831 31.3% 50,748 51.0%
With two selected Conditions 1,397 0.8% 7,665 7.7%
With three selected Conditions 47 0.0% 434 0.4%
With four selected Conditions 23 0.0% 0 0.0%
No selected Conditions 116,739 67.9% 40,755 40.9%
Total 172,037 100.0% 99,602 100.0%
Table 1 - Condition of Units
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Year Unit Built Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number Percentage Number Percentage
2000 or later 22,145 12.9% 12,585 12.6%
1980-1999 51,970 30.2% 25,970 26.1%
1950-1979 74,440 43.3% 42,305 42.5%
Before 1950 18,600 10.8% 14,300 14.4%
Total 4,885 2.8% 4,445 4.5%
Table MA-10: Year Unit Built
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
388
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 13 County California
Ages <4.5 mcg/dL 4.5-9.49
mcg/dL
>9.49 mcg/dL <4.5 mcg/dL 4.5-9.49
mcg/dL
>9.49 mcg/dL
0-5 7,618 32 7 336,386 3,292 838
6-20 362 1 0 27,497 658 142
0-20 7,980 33 7 363,883 3,950 980
Table MA-11: Blood Lead Levels (BLLs) of children under the age of 6 Data Source: California Dept. of Public Health, Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch, California Blood Lead Data & California's Progress in Preventing and Managing Childhood Lead Exposure (Apr. 2022).
Notes for 2020 BLL Data
For children and youth with more than one test in a year, only the test with the highest blood lead level result, and the county of residence at the time of this test, are reported. The 'less than 4.5 mcg/dL' category includes results reported by the analyzing laboratory as <5 mcg/dL. Data exclude results determined to be false positives or clerical errors. Federal and state regulations require that every child in a government-funded health program be given a lead screening at 12 months and again at age 2. When a screening is missed, health care providers are required to screen at the first opportunity up to age 6. Due to disruptions in testing related to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 (for more information, visit the California Dept. of Public Health) and low screening rates in 2019 and earlier years (visit the California Dept. of Health Care Services and California State Auditor), data presented here should be treated with caution. The notation S refers to data that have been suppressed by the data source. N/A means that data are not available.
Need for Owner and Rental Rehabilitation
The age and condition of Ventura County’s housing stock is an important indicator of potential rehabilitation needs. Housing over 30 years of age can be presumed to need some form of major rehabilitation, such as roof replacement, foundation work and plumbing systems. Housing over 20 years of age will generally exhibit deficiencies in terms of paint, weatherization, heating / airconditioning systems, hot water heaters and finish plumbing fixtures. Housing values in Ventura County have increased significantly over a relatively short period of time. Longtime homeowners, especially the elderly and disabled, are more likely to have fixed and limited incomes and may have difficulty maintaining their homes.
This housing stock in Ventura County is dated; 59% of housing units were constructed before 1980 according to 2016-2020 CHAS data. About 29% of owner- and renter-occupied housing in Ventura County was built 30 to 40 years ago between 1980 and 1999.
Further, there is a high share of both senior households and households with disabilities in Ventura County. There are 107,380 households with at least one member over the age of 62 and 55,535 of whom have household incomes at or below 80 percent AMI, according to 2016-2020 CHAS data. 389
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 14 There are approximately 40,100 people ages 18 to 64 with disabilities, according to 2016-2020 ACS five-year estimates. These households may be presumed to have fixed incomes. It is reasonable to anticipate a significant number of housing units in need of repair and a significant number of households need financial assistance to complete those repairs.
Estimated Number of Housing Units Occupied by Low- or Moderate-Income Families with LBP Hazards
Any housing built before 1978 may contain lead-based paint. If ingested, lead may cause severe damage to young children including decreased growth, learning disabilities, impaired hearing, hyperactivity, nerve and brain damage. Lead attacks the central nervous system, the neurological system, and can cause brain damage, IQ reduction, learning disabilities, decreased attention span, hyperactivity, growth inhibition, comas, seizures, and in some cases, death. Fetuses may also experience significant adverse effects through prenatal exposure. Children are more susceptible to the effects of lead because their growing bodies absorb more lead, and young children often put their hands and other objects in their mouths. Most children do not have any symptoms, even if a blood test shows that they have an elevated blood lead level. If a child does have symptoms, the symptoms may be mistaken for the flu or other illnesses.
Most of the housing stock in Ventura County was built before 1979 and is presumed to contain lead paint. The 2016-2020 CHAS data shows low- and moderate-income renter households with children under the age of six were living in housing constructed before 1980, and owner-occupied households meet the same conditions.
Number of Children with Elevated Blood Levels of Lead
The State of California mandates lead screening for all children who participate in publicly funded health programs. In California, screening typically occurs at ages one and two years. A blood level of 10 µg/dL or higher was previously referred to as an “elevated blood level (EBL).” However, as it is now recognized there is no safe level of lead, and adverse effects occur at levels below 10 µg/dL, an “elevated” blood lead level is no longer defined at a specific cut-off point. Of Ventura County children under the age of six whose blood lead level has been fully tested, 39 percent have levels greater than 4.5 mcg/Dl.
Estimated Number of Housing Units Occupied by Low- or Moderate-Income Families that Contain Lead-Based Paint Hazards
Older housing is more likely to have lead-based paint and the amount of lead pigment in the paint tends to increase with the age of the housing. Most of Ventura County’s housing stock was built before 1979, when the use of lead-based paint was outlawed, eliminating the residents of these homes from risk of lead-based paint hazards. The 2016-2020 CHAS data shows low- and moderateincome renter households with children under the age of six were living in housing constructed before 1980, and owner-occupied households meet the same conditions.
Discussion
Preservation of the physical and functional integrity of existing housing units occupied by low- and moderate-income households is a cost-effective way to invest limited resources to retain existing housing units already affordable to low- and moderate-income households in the community. Many different types of housing services are needed. As required by HUD’s Lead Safe Housing Rule, the 390
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 15 Urban County’s and entitlement jurisdictions’ housing rehabilitation programs will include appropriate safety measures such as testing and abatement for projects involving units constructed prior to 1978.
391
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 16 MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing
Introduction
As indicated in section NA-35, Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura (AHACV) administers HUDs Housing Choice and Project-Based voucher programs.
Program Type
Certificate ModRehabPublic
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project
-based
Tenant
-based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled
*
# of units
vouchers
available
# of
accessible
units
Table MA-12: Total Number of Units by Program Type
Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
*Accessible Data was not available on vouchers by project-based and tenant-based designation Describe the supply of public housing developments.
Ventura County has over 8,000 units assisted by the five housing authorities that are active in the county. These are predominately voucher units which are spread across the county. The demand for affordable housing units is quite high, as the majority of waiting lists are not accepting new applicants for housing authority assisted units and waitlist times are measured in years.
Describe the number and physical condition of public housing units in the jurisdiction, including those that are participating in an approved Public Housing Agency Plan Physical condition of PHA units is determined by a physical inspection required by HUD for all HUD-assisted units. The inspections occur every one to three years, dependent on the unit type and past inspection score. The inspection score provides an overall assessment of the physical condition of the public housing development and corresponding units. A higher score indicates the property is in better condition.
Development Name Development City PHA Name Inspection
Date
Inspection
Score
Colonia Village Oxnard Housing Authority Of The
City Of Oxnard
2-Jun-22 82c
Colonia Village Oxnard Housing Authority Of The
City Of Oxnard
31-May-22 75c*
Pleasant Valley Oxnard Housing Authority Of The
City Of Oxnard
1-Jun-22 86c
Plaza Vista Oxnard Housing Authority Of The
City Of Oxnard
9-May-22 89b
Oxnard Townhomes Oxnard Housing Authority Of The
City Of Oxnard
7-Jun-22 85c
*
0 0 1,072 3,798 231 3,567 139 9022 0
392
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 17 Palm Vista Oxnard Housing Authority Of The
City Of Oxnard
28-Apr-22 92b
Mar Vista Port Hueneme Housing Authority Of The
City Of Port Hueneme
3-Apr-23 86b
Westview Village Ventura Housing Authority Of The
City Of San
Buenaventura
5-Jul-22 73b
Buena Vida Et Al Ventura Housing Authority Of The
City Of San
Buenaventura
7-Jul-22 93a
Buena Vida Et Al Ventura Housing Authority Of The
City Of San
Buenaventura
7-Jul-22 79b
Scattered Sites Ventura Housing Authority Of The
City Of San
Buenaventura
20-Mar-23 84c
Whispering Oaks Ojai Housing Authority Of The
County Of Ventura
9-Jun-22 83b
Florence Janss Apts Thousand Oaks Housing Authority Of The County Of Ventura
7-Feb-22 91b
1854 Los Feliz Dr Apts Thousand Oaks Housing Authority Of The County Of Ventura
9-Jun-22 96b
Roth Apartments Meiners Oaks Housing Authority Of The
County Of Ventura
13-Jun-22 92b
Tafoya Terrace Apts Moorpark Housing Authority Of The
County Of Ventura
12-May-22 98b
Ellis Terrace Camarillo Housing Authority Of The
County Of Ventura
6-Jun-22 94b
Fiore Gardens Thousand Oaks Housing Authority Of The
County Of Ventura
8-Feb-22 87c
Table MA-12: Public Housing Condition
Data Source: HUD Real Estate Assessment Center
Describe the restoration and revitalization needs of public housing units in the jurisdiction.
The housing authorities in the county maintain capital improvement plans for all public housing developments and focus on critical restoration and revitalization needs such as roof, elevator, and HVAC replacement and upkeep.
Describe the public housing agency's strategy for improving the living environment of low- and moderate-income families residing in public housing.
The housing authorities maintain active resident councils to gather feedback and input on how to improve the living environment and conditions for households residing in public housing. These councils provide feedback to PHA leadership and boards to inform capital improvements and implementation of services and programming.
393
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 18 MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services
Introduction
Regionally, there are numerous facilities and services targeted to residents at-risk of becoming homeless and experiencing homelessness, including a range of emergency shelters, transitional shelters, and permanent supportive housing options. HUD uses the following definitions for these three facility types:
• Emergency Shelter: Any facility with the primary purpose to provide a temporary shelter for the homeless in general or for specific populations of the homeless and which does not require occupants to sign leases or occupancy agreements. • Transitional Housing: Transitional housing (TH) is designed to provide homeless individuals and families with the interim stability and support to successfully move to and maintain permanent housing. Transitional housing may be used to cover the costs of up to 24 months of housing with accompanying supportive services. Program participants must have a lease (or sublease) or occupancy agreement in place when residing in transitional housing. • Permanent Supportive Housing: Permanent supportive housing (PSH) is defined as community-based housing paired with supportive services to serve households in which at least one member has a disability. Housing does not have a designated length of stay in which formerly homeless individuals and families live as independently as possible. Under PSH, a program participant must be the tenant on a lease (or sublease) for an initial term of at least one year that is renewable and is terminable only for cause.
Facilities and Housing
Targeted to Homeless
Households
Emergency Shelter Beds Transitional
Housing Beds*
Permanent Supportive
Housing Beds
Year-Round
Beds
(Current &
New)
Voucher/
Seasonal/
Overflow
Beds
Current & New Current
& New
Under
Development
Households with Adult(s)
and Child(ren)
528 25 211 131 163
Households with Only
Adults
774 44 504
Chronically Homeless
Households
0 0 347
Veterans 20 20 241
Unaccompanied Youth 6 0 9
Table MA-13: Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households Data Source: Housing Inventory Chart 2024
*Includes Safe Haven
394
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 19 Describe mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services to the extent those services are used to complement services targeted to homeless persons In California, the primary programs for assisting families in poverty are CalWORKS, CalFresh, and Medi-Cal. These programs provide clients with employment assistance, discounted food, medical care, childcare, and cash payments to meet basic needs such as housing and transportation.
The California Work Opportunities for Kids (CalWORKs) program provides financial assistance and Welfare-to-Work services to California families with little to no cash. Through this program these families may be eligible to receive immediate short-term help with housing, food, utilities, clothing, or medical care. Childcare is also available through this program.
CalFresh, formerly the Food Stamp Program, is a nutritional assistance program that provides Electronic Benefit Transfer Cards to people receiving public assistance to purchase food and other essential items.
The Medi-Cal program provides health coverage for people with low-income and limited ability to pay for health coverage, including seniors, those with disabilities, young adults and children, pregnant women, persons in a skilled nursing or intermediate care home, and persons in the Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program (BCCTP). People receiving federally funded cash assistance programs, such as CalWORKs (a state implementation of the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program), the State Supplementation Program (SSP) (a state supplement to the federal Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program), foster care, adoption assistance, certain refugee assistance programs, or In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS), are also eligible.
CDBG-, HOME-, and ESG-Funded Activities
Congress designed the CDBG programs to serve low-income people, some of which may meet the federal poverty definition. The County of Ventura received funding to run CDBG and HOME programs.
At least 70 percent of all CDBG funds must be used for activities that are considered under program rules to benefit low- and moderate-income persons. Additionally, every CDBG activity must meet one of three national objectives: benefit low- and moderate-income persons (at least 51 percent of the beneficiaries must be low- and moderate-income); address slums or blight; or meet a particularly urgent community development need. CDBG programs assist the homeless and those at-risk-of homelessness directly and indirectly.
Under the HOME program, households must earn no more than 80 percent of the AMI, adjusted for household size, to be eligible for assistance. Furthermore, 90 percent of a HOME allocation that is invested in affordable rental housing must be directed to assist households earning no more than 60 percent AMI.
The Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) program provides homeless persons with basic shelter and essential supportive services. It can assist with the operational costs of the shelter facility, and for the administration of the grant. ESG also provides short-term homeless prevention assistance to persons at imminent risk of losing their own housing due to eviction, foreclosure, or utility shutoffs. 395
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 20 MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services
Introduction
Special needs populations include people who are not homeless, but due to various reasons need services and supportive housing. The County of Ventura will consider allocating CDBG public service funding to programs that provide services to special needs populations, including but not limited to those serving the elderly, frail elderly, developmentally disabled, physically disabled, mentally disabled, alcohol or substance abusers, persons with HIV/AIDS, victims of domestic violence, victims of human trafficking and veterans with PTSD or other needs.
Elderly is defined under the CDBG program as a person who is 62 years of age or older. A frail elderly person is an elderly person who is unable to independently perform at least three “activities of daily living” including eating, bathing, grooming or home management activities. Based on 2016-2020 CHAS data of the 107,380 households containing at least one elderly person in 2020, 55,535 households, earn at or below 80 percent of the AMI and may require public services to continue to live independently. ACS data from the same period shows 46,725 residents of Ventura County, aged 65 and above, have a disability. Of those people, 61 percent have cognitive difficulty, 47 percent have vision difficulty, and 40 percent have ambulatory difficulty.
People with disabilities that have a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities generally rely on supportive services to perform activities of daily living. The Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population age 18 and to 64 in Ventura County includes 514,342 individuals, an estimated eight percent of whom have a disability (ACS, 5-year estimates). Of those who have a disability, 42 percent have ambulatory difficulty, 39 percent have an independent living difficulty, 44 percent have cognitive difficulty, 20 percent have a hearing difficulty, 17 percent have a vision difficulty, and 19 percent have a self-care difficulty.
Drug abuse or substance use disorder is defined as the use of chemical substances that lead to an increased risk of problems and an inability to control the use of the substance. Substance use disorder can be indicative of addiction disorder and may stem from physical and mental health issues. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) conducted the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) and found in the state of California the prevalence of substance use disorder over the last year among the population over the age of 11 was 8.27 percent in 2013-2014 and was 17.12 percent in 2021-2022.
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is a virus that weakens one’s immune system by destroying important cells that fight diseases and infection. Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is the final stage of HIV. The Center for Disease Control’s (CDC) Atlas Plus program reported an estimated 1,244 persons living with HIV disease at the end of 2022 in Ventura County. Of that number, 31 of those people had been newly diagnosed during that year (https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/atlas/index.htm, accessed September 2024). New HIV diagnoses were most concentrated among those 25-34 years of age.
396
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 21 Domestic Violence includes, but is not limited to, felony or misdemeanor crimes of violence committed by a current or former spouse of the victim or by a person who is cohabitating with or has cohabited with the victim. In 2022, 1,307 calls related to domestic violence were made from Ventura County (openjustice.doj.ca.gov, accessed September 2024). Of these domestic incidents, 52 involved a weapon and 1,255 did not.
Human trafficking is a crime that involves the forceful, fraudulent, or coercive methods of entrapping a person, real or perceived, to exploit them for financial gain. The exploitative nature can come in the form of labor services, involuntary servitude, enslavement, debt bondage or commercial sex acts.
Human trafficking is extremely difficult to track; there is no recent or reliable prevalence rate to report. In 2021 the National Human Trafficking Hotline received the most calls from California of all 50 states (https://humantraffickinghotline.org/ accessed December 2023). Of national cases reported to the hotline, the majority were for sex trafficking of adult women. The U.S. Department of State Trafficking in Persons Report published in July 2022, reports victims of human trafficking are found in every state in the country and trafficked from every country in the world. Victims of human trafficking in the United States are most frequently trafficked from within the United States, Mexico, and Honduras.
The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) explains Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) can “develop after exposure to a potentially traumatic event that is beyond a typical stressor” and potential inducing events may include, but are not limited to, “violent personal assaults, natural or human-caused disasters, accidents, combat, and other forms of violence.” Symptoms of PTSD can be debilitating. The U.S. Department of Veteran’s Affairs National Center for PTSD reports an estimated six percent of the population, eight percent of women and four percent of men, will have PTSD at some point in their lives.
Including the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities (mental, physical, developmental), persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, public housing residents and any other categories the jurisdiction may specify, and describe their supportive housing needs.
To determine the level of need and types of services needed by special needs populations, the region conducted a public and stakeholder survey, consulted with local service providers, and reviewed data from the ACS, CHAS, CDC, State of California Department of Justice, U.S. Department of State, and NIMH. Supportive services required for special needs populations include case management, medical or psychological counseling and supervision, childcare, transportation, and job training for the purpose of facilitating a person’s stability and independence.
In housing, accessibility modifications to accommodate persons with mobility disabilities may include, but are not limited to, wider doorways, no step thresholds, installation of ramps, grab bars, lowered countertops, and accessible hardware. The needs of residents with sensory disabilities are different from those with mobility disabilities. Individuals with hearing disabilities require visual adaptations for such items as the telephone ringer, the doorbell and smoke alarms. Residents who are blind may require tactile marking of changes in floor level and stair edges and braille markings on appliances and controls. People with low vision may require large print markings and displays, 397
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 22 contrasting colors to distinguish changes in level or transition from one area to another, proper lighting, and reduced glare from lighting and windows.
Describe programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and physical health institutions receive appropriate supportive housing
Insufficient supply of supportive housing together with inadequate discharge planning and coordination contributes to homelessness in situations where people are released from public institutions or public systems of care without having an appropriate mainstream or supportive housing option in place. Coordinated discharge planning for those exiting foster care, health and mental health care, and corrections is recognized as a best practice. The state mandates discharge planning policy for foster, health and mental health, and corrections. 398
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 23 MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing
Negative Effects of Public Policies on Affordable Housing and Residential Investment Ventura County and the entitlement jurisdictions continue to strive to ensure that affordable housing is accessible to all community members and all members benefit from community and residential investments. However, the development of new residential development is limited because most existing residential areas are fully built out – leaving development to predominately consist of infill development and redevelopment of existing buildings.
Development of affordable housing is a particular challenge in each jurisdiction because financial subsidy is usually needed to create housing units that will charge less than a market-rate rent. There are limited amounts of resources available to fund affordable housing development throughout the county, as well as limited funding for corresponding services and facilities that may be required along with development, such as infrastructure or social services associated with the housing. As such, the demand for such housing far outpaces each jurisdiction’s resources to address it and, as a result, the need for affordable housing continues to grow across the county. 399
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 24 MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets
Introduction
During the implementation of the 2025-2029 Strategic Plan, the Urban County and the entitlement jurisdictions will use CDBG funds to provide a suitable living environment for low- and moderateincome people.
Economic Development Market Analysis
Business Activity by Sector Number
of
Workers
Number
of Jobs
Share of
Workers
Share of
Jobs
Jobs less
Workers
Agriculture, Mining, Oil & Gas 411,295 25,108 51.3% 8.9% -42.4% Arts, Entertainment, Accommodations 39,851 29,146 5.0% 10.4% 5.4% Construction 25,178 17,679 3.1% 6.3% 3.2%
Education and Health Care Services 81,509 72,075 10.2% 25.7% 15.5% Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 29,977 15,914 3.7% 5.7% 1.9% Information 10,019 3,942 1.3% 1.4% 0.2%
Manufacturing 39,322 26,253 4.9% 9.3% 4.4%
Other Services 22,078 7,340 2.8% 2.6% -0.1%
Professional, Scientific, Management 52,279 25,274 6.5% 9.0% 2.5% Public Administration 22,179 10,844 2.8% 3.9% 1.1%
Retail Trade 41,209 29,360 5.1% 10.5% 5.3%
Transportation and Warehousing 14613 5,066 1.8% 1.8% 0.0% Wholesale Trade 11989 12,811 1.5% 4.6% 3.1%
Total 801,498 280,812 100% 100% 0
Table MA-14: Business Activity
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS (Workers), 2020 Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (Jobs) 400
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 25 Labor Force Statistics Number of People
Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 433,409
Civilian Employed Population 16 years and over 411,295
Unemployment Rate 5.1%
Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 1.6%
Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65 2.9%
Table MA-15: Labor Force
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Occupations by Sector Number of People
Management, business and financial 67,157
Farming, fisheries, and forestry occupations 17,095
Service 72,457
Sales and office 88,420
Construction, extraction, maintenance, and repair 31,261 Production, transportation, and material moving 43,946
Table MA-16: Occupations by Sector
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Travel Time to Work People Percentage
< 30 Minutes 246,213 66%
30-59 Minutes 93,072 25%
60 or More Minutes 31,518 9%
Total 370,803 1
Table MA-17: Travel Time
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
401
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 26 Educational Attainment In Labor Force Not in Labor
Civilian Force
Employed
Unemployed
Less than high school graduate 43,407 2,962 17,703
High school graduate (includes
equivalency)
60,593 3784 20,062
Some college or Associate's degree 109,261 4,432 28,450 Bachelor's degree or higher 121,926 4168 22,161
Table MA-18: Educational Attainment by Employment Status (Population 16 and Older) Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Educational Attainment by Age Age in years
18–24 25–34 35–44 45–65 65+
Less than 9th grade 1,441 6,125 9,798 21,480 11,965
9th to 12th grade, no diploma 6,796 7,039 6,853 12,777 6,224 High school graduate, GED, or alternative 24,102 24,789 20,519 39,505 26,907 Some college, no degree 32,400 28,371 21,838 47,623 29,257 Associate's degree 6,537 12,430 10,435 22,725 12,195
Bachelor's degree 6,922 26,208 22,172 49,516 25,614
Graduate or professional degree 460 8,420 13,517 29,282 19,510 Table MA-19: Educational Attainment by Age
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Educational Attainment Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Less than high school graduate $45,018
High school graduate (includes equivalency) $25,585
Some college or Associate's degree $32,718
Bachelor's degree $44,173
Graduate or professional degree $64,383
Table 2 – Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months by Educational Attainment Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major employment sectors within your jurisdiction?
According to 2020 Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEHD) data, the top four major private employment sectors by number of jobs were Education and Health Care Services (81,509 402
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Market Analysis - 27 jobs), Retail Trade (41,209 jobs), Arts, Entertainment, Accommodations (39,851 jobs), Manufacturing (39,322 jobs).
Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community The business community in Ventura County relies largely on a skilled workforce. Employers across all sectors, and especially those for which facilities in Ventura Countyare a destination location or part of a larger logistics chain such as transportation and warehousing, depend on well-functioning roads and transportation system.
How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment opportunities in the jurisdiction?
An estimated 65 percent of Ventura County’s population, aged 18-64, has some post-secondary education, 34 percent of whom have some college or Associate’s degree. Generally, the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to the employment opportunities in the city.
Discussion
In the spring of 2020, unemployment rates in the United States reached the highest levels since the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) began recording this data. According to the BLS, national unemployment rates reached 23.5 percent in May 2020. Unemployment rates remained at historically high levels for almost six months. As of July 2024, unemployment rates had come down
5.0 percent in Ventura County. In 2019, prior to the pandemic, the unemployment rate in Ventura County was 3.8 percent. Another indication of the negative economic impact of the pandemic is the year over year decrease in gross domestic product (GDP) of 2.3 percent from 2019 to 2020 in California, and 2.3 percent in Ventura County as calculated by the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). GDP rebounded with an increase of 3.4 percent in the county and 7.8 percent statewide from 2020 to 2021.
403
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 28 MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion
Are there areas where households with multiple housing problems are concentrated?(include a definition of “concentration”)
Housing problems impact low- and moderate-income households disproportionately compared to higher income households. Any areas with a concentration of low- and moderate-income households are more likely to have high rates of housing problems, especially cost burden, the most common housing problem in Ventura County. Based on analysis of concentration data throughout the county, a concentration is determined if more than 26% of the households experience multiple housing problems.
This concentration is most prevalent in South and East Oxnard, Port Hueneme, and areas between Thousand Oaks and Fillmore.
Are there any areas in the jurisdiction where racial or ethnic minorities or low-income families are concentrated? (include a definition of “concentration”) The cities of Oxnard, Fillmore, Port Hueneme, and Santa Paula have the highest concentration of Hispanic or Latino residents. Areas with a higher concentration of low-income block groups (greater than 51% of the residents are low- or moderate-income) are located in and around the cities of San Buenaventura, Port Hueneme, Oxnard, and Santa Paula.
What are the characteristics of the market in these areas/neighborhoods? The low-income areas and areas with a higher share of housing problems tend to overlap. These neighborhoods tend to have a higher share of rental housing and are more likely to have an aging housing stock.
Are there any community assets in these areas/neighborhoods? The County and entitlement jurisdictions have a number of non-profit and service providers that actively provide services within these neighborhoods – helping to promote and improve access to public services, adequate public facilities and safe and clean open space.
Are there other strategic opportunities in any of these areas? Throughout the community meetings, community members cited the need for ongoing investment to continue to maintain and improve public services, affordable housing and access to public facilities throughout the County. The need for these programs is most acute in these concentrated neighborhoods.
404
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 29 MA-60 Broadband Needs
Describe the need for broadband wiring and connections for households, including low- and moderate-income households and neighborhoods.
All residences and small businesses in Ventura County may access to fixed and mobile broadband.
Internet Service Providers (ISP) self-report to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on broadband availability throughout the county. Fixed broadband goes to homes and small businesses using fiber, cable, DSL, satellite, and fixed wireless technology. Mobile broadband is stationary coverage outdoors and mobile in-vehicle coverage. The FCC National Broadband Map shows, as of June 2023, that fixed internet access is available at six different download/upload speeds ranging from 0.2/0.2 megabits per second (Mbps) to 1000/100 Mbps and mobile access is available at the three fastest download/ upload rates available 4G, 5/1 Mbps, 5G-NR, 7/1 Mbps, and 5G-NR, 35/3 Mbps.
The FCC offered financial assistance to help households with low-income afford access to the internet. A discount of up to $50 per month was awarded to eligible households. This program was available to new applicants from 2021 through February 2024. As of September 2024, 55,640 households in Ventura County subscribed to this program. This indicated a high level of need of affordable broadband.
Describe the need for increased competition by having more than one broadband Internet service provider serve the jurisdiction.
According to the FCC there are 10 active fixed internet providers in Ventura County. Hughes Network Systems, LLC, Space Exploration Technologies Corp., Viasat, Inc. and Charter Communications reach at least 80 percent of residences in the County. There are four active mobile internet providers.
The main mobile internet providers are Hughes Network Systems, Space Exploration Technologies, Viasat, and Charter Communications.
405
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Needs Assessment - 30 MA-65 Hazard Mitigation
Describe the jurisdiction’s increased natural hazard risks associated with climate change.
The County of Ventura has a current Hazard Mitigation Plan published in 2022. The plan assessed the risk associated with the categories that follow: avalanche, dam failure, drought, earthquake, erosion, expansive soils, extreme cold, extreme heat, flood, hail, hurricane, landslide, lightening, sea level rise, severe wind, severe winter weather, storm surge, subsidence, tornado, tsunami, and wildfire.
Describe the vulnerability of housing occupied by low- and moderate-income households to these risks.
Low- and moderate-income residents and special needs populations are especially vulnerable to the risks of climate-related hazards. The residences of low- and moderate-income households are more often in worse condition and thus are more susceptible to external weather conditions such as extreme heat. Likewise, elderly residents are at a greater risk during extreme weather events such as extreme heat events.
406
Section 5:
Strategic Plan
407
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 1 Strategic Plan
SP-05 Overview
The Strategic Plan outlines each jurisdiction’s plan for allocating HUD entitlement grants and identifies local priorities within the regional context. Informed by qualitative and quantitative data gathered through citizen participation and consultation with stakeholders throughout the region, market analysis, and an assessment of U.S. Census and other local data that reflect community needs, the Strategic Plan identifies the highest priority needs toward which to direct grant dollars.
The following regional goals were identified to meet high-priority needs identified through the Needs Assessment, Market Analysis, and consultation with stakeholders and the general public (in no particular order or ranking):
− Improve the supply of affordable housing
− Increase and improve social services
− Work to end homelessness
− Create and maintain quality neighborhoods
− Promote economic development
− Effective administration
408
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 2 SP-10 Geographic Priorities
Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the jurisdiction (or within the EMSA for HOPWA)
Ventura County invests community development resources to address needs of low- and moderateincome persons living throughout the jurisdiction. Each entitlement jurisdiction additionally allocates resources that geographically target specific neighborhoods in which the majority of residents are low- and moderate-income. With limited resources, each community identifies opportunities to target resources at areas that have the greatest need or that would maximize the impact of the investment.
Individual activities funded by the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program are designed to benefit low- and moderate-income (LMI) persons or, in the case of activities like parks and streets, areas where at least 51 percent of the residents are low- and moderate-income persons.
However, the jurisdictions of Camarillo and Thousand Oaks are considered “Exception Grantees” by HUD, meaning that the area served by such activities must be within the highest quartile of low- and moderate-income block groups (rather than areas where at least 51 percent of persons are low- and moderate-income). For fiscal year 2024, the percentages of LMI persons were 39.22 percent in Camarillo and 34.24 percent in Thousand Oaks; these percentages are adjusted by HUD annually.
Within the City of San Buenaventura, the Westside Ventura Neighborhood is one of the oldest and most socio-economically diverse communities. The area is bounded by the Ojai Freeway (Highway 33) to the west, steep hillsides to the east, Ottawa Street to the north, and Park Row Avenue to the south. These Census block groups are the Westside Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area (NRSA), a section of the City that has been created to deliver focused revitalization activities using CDBG funds. While expenditure of CDBG funds must typically meet strict eligibility and recordkeeping requirements, communities with approved NRSAs are offered enhanced flexibility in undertaking economic development, housing, and public service activities with CDBG funds within the approved NRSA boundaries. This flexibility is designed to promote innovative programs in economically disadvantaged residential areas of the community. The Westside Ventura Neighborhood NRSA is the only geographic priority area within the Ventura County entitlement jurisdictions.
409
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 3 SP-25 Priority Needs
Through the Consolidated Plan process, the Ventura County region identified a range of priority needs that are both regional in nature and specific to each jurisdiction. While all needs were identified as critical within the community, each jurisdiction does not have available HUD and other resources to fund activities to address each need.
Priority needs are assigned a “high” or “low” priority as prescribed by HUD. Generally, “high” priority needs are ranked in a fashion where funds will be allocated to address the needs during the 5-year Consolidated Plan cycle. While the need may not be funded each year, it is the intent of the jurisdiction to prioritize funding to address the need. On the contrary, while “low” priority needs are still critical needs or gaps within the jurisdiction, they are less likely to be funded with HUD resources during the Consolidated Plan cycle. This may be due to the availability of other resources to address these needs.
1. Development of New Affordable Housing
Description: Throughout the County, there is an acute need for affordable housing for low- and moderateincome households.
Level of Need: Ventura County High
Camarillo High
Oxnard High
Simi Valley High
San Buenaventura High
Thousand Oaks High
Basis for Relative Priority: The demand for affordable housing has grown considerably within the past five years as
vacancy rates continue to remain relatively low
and the market rate for housing continues to
outpace wage growth. For a household earning
minimum wage, they would need to earn more
than 3.5 minimum wage salaries to afford a
market rate 2-bedroom apartment without
being cost burdened.
410
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 4 This need should be supported by
collaboration with other city and county
agencies to streamline and support the
permitting and building process for new
affordable housing.
Population: Extremely-low income
Low-income
Moderate-income
Large households
Households with children
Elderly
Farmworker households
Public Housing residents
Geographic Area: All
2. Housing Rehabilitation
Description: Throughout the County, there is a need to
maintain adequate and quality housing stock,
especially for low- and moderate-income
households.
By addressing this need, the region may be able
to preserve and improve the quality of
affordable housing within the county.
Level of Need: Ventura County High
Camarillo High
Oxnard High
Simi Valley High
San Buenaventura High
411
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 5 Thousand Oaks High
Basis for Relative Priority: The age of housing stock throughout Ventura County is relatively high and indicating a
potential need for ongoing rehabilitation. This
is coupled with an aging population who have
less disposable income to address immediate
repair needs and/ or make units more
accessible to age in place.
Population: Extremely-low income
Low-income
Moderate-income
Large households
Households with children
Elderly
Farmworker households
Persons with disabilities
Geographic Area: All
3. Housing Services
Description: In an effort to support first-time homebuyers and households with children, provide access
to financial and non-financial support and
assistance to accessing the homeownership
market through programs such as
downpayment and closing cost assistance,
homebuyer coaching, and subsidized property
inspections.
Level of Need: Ventura County High
Camarillo High
Oxnard High
Simi Valley High
412
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 6 San Buenaventura High
Thousand Oaks High
Basis for Relative Priority: The cost of ownership housing is continuing to rise, making it more difficult for first-time
homebuyers to access the housing market due
to cost of entry into the market. Through
targeted subsidy programs, jurisdictions can
provide support to these households to better
access home ownership.
Population: Moderate-income
Large households
Households with children
Geographic Area: All
4. Housing Stability
Description: Through tenant-based rental assistance and diversion programs, provide short- and
medium-long term rental assistance to
extremely low-income, and low-income
households who are at-risk of homelessness.
Level of Need: Ventura County High
Camarillo High
Oxnard High
Simi Valley High
San Buenaventura High
Thousand Oaks High
Basis for Relative Priority: Throughout the region, there is a large share of households who are extremely low- and lowincome who are experiencing cost or severe cost burden. Nationally, these households are
413
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 7 most at risk to experience homelessness due
to a singular change in circumstances.
Population: Extremely-low income
Low-income
Households experiencing homelessness
Farmer households
Geographic Area: All
5. Homelessness
Description: In collaboration with the Ventura County
Continuum of Care, provide holistic and
complete supports to households
experiencing or at-risk of experiencing
homelessness through the provision of rapid
re-housing, emergency shelter and supportive
services.
Level of Need: Ventura County High
Camarillo High
Oxnard High
Simi Valley High
San Buenaventura High
Thousand Oaks High
Basis for Relative Priority: There is a high number of homeless households and individuals within the region.
The need for coordination across the spectrum
of activities to support this community is high.
Population: Extremely low-income households
Homeless
Unaccompanied Youth
414
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 8 Mentally Ill
Chronic Substance Abuse
Geographic Area: All
6. Supportive Services
Description: Provide targeted services for youth, elderly, persons with disabilities, victims of domestic
violence, veterans, and other higher need
populations within the region
Level of Need: Ventura County High
Camarillo High
Oxnard High
Simi Valley High
San Buenaventura High
Thousand Oaks High
Basis for Relative Priority: Through stakeholder and community feedback, it was indicated that low-income
individuals benefit from services provided to
increase quality of life and provide basic
needs.
Population: Extremely low-income households
Low-income
Moderate-income
Households with children
Elderly
Frail Elderly
Persons with Disabilities
415
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 9 Persons with Addictions
Victims of Domestic Violence
Veterans
Geographic Area: All
7. Fair Housing Services
Description: Provide training to landlords and banking
institutions and services to individuals and
households experiencing housing
discrimination or at-risk of experiencing
housing discrimination
Level of Need: Ventura County High
Camarillo High
Oxnard High
Simi Valley High
San Buenaventura High
Thousand Oaks High
Basis for Relative Priority: Through consultation and the Analysis of Impediments, the need for fair housing
services is apparent throughout the region
Population: Extremely low-income households
Low-income
Moderate-income
Households with children
Elderly
Frail Elderly
Persons with Disabilities
Persons with Addictions
416
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 10 Victims of Domestic Violence
Geographic Area: All
8. Public Facility Maintenance
Description: Maintain high quality public facilities to serve the needs of low- and moderate-income
households
Level of Need: Ventura County High
Camarillo Low
Oxnard High
Simi Valley High
San Buenaventura High
Thousand Oaks High
Basis for Relative Priority: Through consultation, the need for public facility maintenance and improvements was
identified as especially needed in Oxnard and
San Buenaventura. While the need exists in
Ventura County, Camarillo, Simi Valley and
Thousand Oaks, it is not as acute as the other
jurisdictions.
Population: Extremely low-income households
Low-income
Moderate-income
Households with children
Elderly
Frail Elderly
Persons with Disabilities
Persons with Addictions
417
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 11 Victims of Domestic Violence
Geographic Area: All
9. Street Improvements and Infrastructure
Description: Maintain streetscapes and sidewalks in lowand moderate-income neighborhoods Level of Need: Ventura County Low
Camarillo Low
Oxnard Low
Simi Valley Low
San Buenaventura Low
Thousand Oaks Low
Basis for Relative Priority: While the need for maintaining high quality streets and sidewalks exists, it is a lower need
when compared to the other needs identified in
this Strategic Plan
Population: Extremely low-income households
Low-income
Moderate-income
Geographic Area: All
10. Economic Support for Small Businesses & Job Training Description: Promote small business development and
provide job training to meet the economic
needs within the community.
Level of Need: Ventura County Low
418
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 12 Camarillo Low
Oxnard Low
Simi Valley Low
San Buenaventura High
Thousand Oaks Low
Basis for Relative Priority: While the need for economic support exists throughout the county, economic
development programs funded through CDBG
are time intensive and require intensive
regulations. Given this challenge coupled with
the other needs identified in this Strategic Plan,
this is deemed a low need for this Consolidated
Plan cycle.
Population: Extremely low-income households
Low-income
Moderate-income
Geographic Area: All
11. Disaster Planning and Recovery
Description: Disaster planning and recovery activities after severe weather, fire, or earthquakes.
Level of Need: Ventura County Low
Camarillo Low
Oxnard Low
Simi Valley Low
San Buenaventura Low
Thousand Oaks Low
419
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 13 Basis for Relative Priority: Fires and severe weather occur frequently in the Ventura County region. Planning and
recovery activities are needed on an ongoing or
urgent need basis to assist low- and moderateincome areas or households. These activities would be supported as funding allows or by
disaster need relative to other housing and
community development needs within the
community.
Population: Non-housing community development
Geographic Area: All
420
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 14 SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions
Affordable
Housing Type
Market Characteristics that will influence the use of funds available for housing type
Tenant-Based
Rental Assistance
(TBRA)
Similar to HUD Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV) or Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH), TBRA rental assistance covers part or all of a low-income tenant’s rent. Such assistance is often most beneficial in high-housing cost/ high-development cost areas where there is little affordable housing available. Generally, successful programs require engagement with landlords to market the program and establish an available pipeline of potential units for TBRA recipients.
TBRA interventions should generally be paired with complementary initiatives to expand and/ or maintain affordable housing.
TBRA for NonHomeless Special
Needs
A targeted TBRA program or homeless prevention program is a key component to help extremely low-income or other special needs households establish stable housing.
These households generally face similar, albeit more exacerbated, challenges experienced by low-income households.
TBRA for targeted populations is often most effective when paired with supportive services or other wrap around support to ensure ongoing stability for the household.
New Unit
Production
Housing demand continues to outpace housing construction within Ventura County.
This is anticipated to only be accentuated by the 2025 fire season in southern California.
Affordable housing is in extremely high demand throughout the County and continues to be the most needed housing investment to support low- and moderate-income households.
Rehabilitation 59 percent of housing units in Ventura County were constructed before 1980 according to 2016-2020 CHAS data. Preservation of the physical and functional integrity of existing housing units occupied by low- and moderate-income households is a cost-effective way to invest limited resources to retain existing housing units that are already affordable to low- and moderate-income households in the community.
Addressing substandard housing conditions through housing preservation activities provides that all economic segments of the community have the means to ensure that their property meets local standards.
Acquisition,
including
preservation
Acquisition, for the purpose of creating or maintaining affordable housing would be beneficial to increasing the supply of affordable housing throughout the County.
However, because of the rising cost of real estate throughout the County, such options would need to be carefully evaluated to ensure that the cost of the acquisition plus the corresponding construction or rehabilitation cost is low enough to provide an adequate benefit for the cost. The County and entitlement jurisdictions should first evaluate existing underutilized city, county, and state land within the region to determine if any could be leveraged into affordable housing. Likewise, the County and jurisdictions should evaluate partnerships with nonprofit or other socially driven organizations within the county who may have land holdings or can assist in the acquisition of new property.
Table SP-1: Influence of Market Conditions
421
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 15 SP-35 Anticipated Resources
Introduction
During the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan from July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2030, the Urban County of Ventura and the jurisdictions of Camarillo, Oxnard, San Buenaventura, Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks anticipate the following allocation of CDBG, HOME and ESG resources.
The funding estimates are currently established using 2024 allocations. The funding allocations will be revised once HUD provides the 2025 award allocations.
Program Uses of Funds
Expected Amount Available for 5-Years
Expected
Amount
Available
Remainder
of Con Plan
Narrative
Annual Description
Allocation:
Program
Income:
Prior Year
Resources:
Total:
Urban County of Ventura
CDBG
Acquisition
Admin and Planning
Economic Development
Housing
Public Improvements
Public Services
$1,428,843 $1,428,843 $7,144,215
Based on 2024
FY allocation
from HUD.
Steady annual
funding is
anticipated.
HOME
Acquisition
Homebuyer assistance
Homeowner rehab
Multifamily rental new
construction
Multifamily rental rehab
New construction for
ownership
TBRA
$1,221,315 $1,221,315 $6,106,575
Based on 2024
FY allocation
from HUD.
Steady annual
funding is
anticipated.
Camarillo
CDBG
Acquisition
Admin and Planning
Economic Development
Housing
Public Improvements
Public Services
$350,107 $159,498 $350,107 $1,910,033
Based on 2024
FY allocation
from HUD.
Steady annual
funding is
anticipated.
Oxnard
CDBG
Acquisition
Admin and Planning
Economic Development
Housing
Public Improvements
Public Services
2,100,000 $100,000 $2,200,000 $11,000,000
Based on 2024
FY allocation
from HUD.
Steady annual
funding is
anticipated.
422
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 16 Program Uses of Funds
Expected Amount Available for 5-Years
Expected
Amount
Available
Remainder
of Con Plan
Narrative
Annual Description
Allocation:
Program
Income:
Prior Year
Resources:
Total:
HOME
Acquisition
Homebuyer assistance
Homeowner rehab
Multifamily rental new
construction
Multifamily rental rehab
New construction for
ownership
TBRA
Admin and Planning
$600,000 $150,000 $750,000 $3,750,000
Based on 2024
FY allocation
from HUD.
Steady annual
funding is
anticipated.
ESG
Rapid Rehousing
Homelessness
Prevention
Shelter
Street Outreach
Admin and Planning
$200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000
Based on 2024
FY allocation
from HUD.
Steady annual
funding is
anticipated.
San Buenaventura
CDBG
Acquisition
Admin and Planning
Economic
Development
Housing
Public
Improvements
Public Services
$677,690 $677,690 $3,388,450
Based on 2024
FY allocation
from HUD.
Steady annual
funding is
anticipated.
HOME
Acquisition
Homebuyer
assistance
Homeowner rehab
Multifamily rental
new construction
Multifamily rental
rehab
New construction
for ownership
TBRA
$393,672 $393,672 $1,968,360
Based on 2024
FY allocation
from HUD.
Steady annual
funding is
anticipated.
Simi Valley
CDBG
Acquisition
Admin and Planning
Economic
Development
Housing
Public
Improvements
Public Services
$672,694 $3,363,470
Based on 2024
FY allocation
from HUD.
Steady annual
funding is
anticipated.
Thousand Oaks
CDBG
Acquisition
Admin and Planning
Economic
Development
Housing
Public
Improvements
Public Services
$607,042 $3,035,210
Based on 2024
FY allocation
from HUD.
Steady annual
funding is
anticipated.
423
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 17 Table SP-2:Anticipated Resources
424
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 18 Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state, and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied.
The jurisdictions leverage federal resources against other sources of federal, state, local, and private funding to maximize the impact of CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds. Leveraging varies from activity to activity depending on the project scope and grant requirements.
Although the CDBG program does not require a match, the HOME program and the ESG program require funding match. The HOME program requires a 25 percent non-federal cash or non-cash match of the annual grant amount or entitlement, less 10 percent for administration and five percent for Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) operating support.
ESG match is required on a one-to-one basis (100 percent match). ESG grantees report required match detail to the Ventura County Continuum of Care (CoC) on a monthly or semi-annual basis.
Matching contributions from ESG grantees (cash or non-cash) may be obtained from any source, including any federal source other than the ESG program, as well as state, local, and private sources, per 24 CFR 576.201. Depending on the financing structure of a given activity, it may be advantageous for the City to use CDBG funds to leverage appropriate resources. Examples of leveraged federal and state resources include, but are not limited to those listed below:
Federal Resources
− Continuum of Care (CoC) Program
− HUD Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH)
− Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202)
− Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) − Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)
− YouthBuild
− Federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program
− Project Based Housing Choice Vouchers
State Resources
− Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program − Building Equity and Growth in Neighborhoods Program (BEGIN) − CalHFA Single and Multi-Family Program
− CalHome Program
− Encampment Resolution Funds (ERF)
− Homekey
− Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention Program (HHAP) − Housing and Homeless Incentive Program (HHIP)
− Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program
− Mental Health Service Act (MHSA) Funding
− Multifamily Housing Program (MHP)
− Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA)
425
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 19 − Tax-Exempt Bond Financing
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan.
Most County- and jurisdiction-owned property is used to house County or City operations or is deedrestricted, limiting its feasibility for new uses. The County and jurisdictions have been evaluating land it owns, as it becomes available, for the purpose of providing affordable housing and will continue to consider land that is deemed as surplus for the needs identified in the Regional Consolidated Plan.
426
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 20 SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure
Responsible Entity Responsible Entity
Type
Role Geographic Area Served
City of Camarillo Government agency Economic Development Homelessness
Non-homeless special
needs
Ownership
Planning
Rental
Neighborhood
improvements
Public facilities
Public services
Jurisdiction
City of Oxnard Government agency Economic Development
Homelessness
Non-homeless special
needs
Ownership
Planning
Rental
Neighborhood
improvements
Public facilities
Public services
Jurisdiction
City of San Buenaventura Government agency Economic Development Homelessness
Non-homeless special
needs
Ownership
Planning
Rental
Neighborhood
improvements
Public facilities
Public services
Jurisdiction
City of Simi Valley Government agency Economic Development Homelessness
Non-homeless special
needs
Ownership
Planning
Rental
Neighborhood
improvements
Public facilities
Public services
Jurisdiction
City of Thousand Oaks Government agency Economic Development Homelessness
Jurisdiction
427
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 21 Non-homeless special
needs
Ownership
Planning
Rental
Neighborhood
improvements
Public facilities
Public services
Ventura Urban County Government agency Economic Development Homelessness
Non-homeless special
needs
Ownership
Planning
Rental
Neighborhood
improvements
Public facilities
Public services
Jurisdiction
Area Housing Authority
of the County of Ventura
Public Housing
Authority
Rental Region
Housing Authority of City
of San Buenaventura
Public Housing
Authority
Rental Jurisdiction
Santa Paula Housing
Authority
Public Housing
Authority
Rental Jurisdiction
Housing Authority of The
City of Port Hueneme
Public Housing
Authority
Rental Jurisdiction
Oxnard Housing
Authority
Public Housing
Authority
Rental Jurisdiction
Ventura County
Continuum of Care
Continuum of Care Homelessness Region
Table SP-3: Institutional Delivery Structure
Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System To promote access to affordable housing and robust community development services, the jurisdictions within Ventura County collaborate with a range partners in the community – including the Housing Authorities listed above as well as the Ventura County Continuum of Care.
The County and participating entitlement jurisdictions partner annually with 50-plus local providers of public and social services to assist in the delivery of subsidized services to low- and moderateincome individuals and households. These partnerships help to meet the needs of the elderly, youth, disabled persons, victim of domestic violence, homeless persons, veterans, and other populations with specialized needs.
Despite these partnerships, gaps in the delivery system continue to exist. These are largely related to a lack of overall funding to meet the housing and community development needs within the region. 428
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 22 Availability of services targeted to homeless persons and persons with HIV and mainstream services
Homelessness Prevention
Services
Available in the
Community
Targeted to
Homeless
Targeted to People
with HIV
Homelessness Prevention Services
Counseling/Advocacy X X X
Legal Assistance X
Mortgage Assistance
Rental Assistance X X X
Utilities Assistance X X X
Street Outreach Services
Law Enforcement X X
Mobile Clinics X X
Other Street Outreach Services X X
Supportive Services
Alcohol & Drug Abuse X X
Child Care X
Education X
Employment and Employment
Training X X
Healthcare X X X
HIV/AIDS X X
Life Skills X X
Mental Health Counseling X X
Transportation X X
Table SP-4: Homeless Prevention Services Summary
Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the services listed above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) In 2023, the Ventura County Continuum of Care updated its Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness.
In this Plan, the County identified five key action areas that, when completed, will address homelessness across the region.
429
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 23
1. Housing Prioritization and Funding: Focus on increasing permanent housing options
2. Regional Coordination and Leadership: Ensure consistency and alignment across jurisdictions, the public and service providers.
3. Outreach and Service Delivery: Establish a command center to standardize outreach and service delivery across the County.
4. Data-Driven Decision Making: Utilize real time data to evaluate the effectiveness of program interventions and share outcomes with the community.
5. Representation and Inclusivity: Include people with lived experience in the decision making process.
Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs population and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed above.
Ventura Urban County and all entitlement cities partner with social services agencies to undertake activities that benefit low- and moderate-income households and special populations of the elderly, youth, disabled persons, victims of domestic violence, homeless persons, and veterans.
Service delivery can differ between sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations within the county. Shelter has been unavailable to persons experiencing homelessness for large portions of each year, limiting delivery of programs and services for these individuals. Funding or lack of facilities, such as in the case of limited permanent supportive housing units in the County, may also create a gap or delay in service delivery.
Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional structure and service delivery system for carrying out a strategy to address priority needs.
To address the lack of resources necessary to fully address the needs of special needs populations and persons experiencing homelessness, the County and entitlement jurisdictions will continue to partner closely with the Ventura County Continuum of Care to achieve the five action area goals established in the 2023 plan.
430
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 24 SP-45 Goals Summary
GOAL OUTCOME INDICATORS TO BE UPDATED BASED ON FINAL ACTION PLANS Goal 1: Improve the Supply of Affordable Housing
Develop and maintain affordable housing opportunities for low- and moderate-income homeowners and renters.
Priority Needs
• Development of New Affordable Housing
• Housing Rehabilitation
• Housing Services
• Housing Stability
• Disaster Planning and Recovery
Start Year 2025 Category Affordable Housing
End Year 2029 Geographic Area(s) All
Five Year Funding CDBG HOME ESG Total
Camarillo $250,000
Oxnard $2,200,000 $3,375,000
San Buenaventura $1,524,803 $1,771,524
Simi Valley $336,347
Thousand Oaks $1,972,887
Ventura Urban County $3,572,108 $5,495,918
Goal
Outcome
Indicator
Camarillo Oxnard San
Buenaventura
Simi
Valley
Thousand
Oaks
Ventura
Urban
County
Rental Units
Rehabilitated
Homeowner
Rehabilitation 125
55 25
30 250
50 300
10 30
431
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 25 Rental
Construction
Homeowner
Construction
Direct
Financial
Assistance to
homebuyers
125
125
118
11 20
Goal 2: Increase and Improve Social Services
Increase and improve access to public service programs targeting low- and moderate-income residents.
Priority Needs
• Supportive Services
• Fair Housing Services
• Disaster Planning and Recovery
Start Year 2025 Category Non-Homeless Special
Needs
Non-Housing Community
Development
End Year 2029 Geographic Area(s) All
Five Year Funding CDBG HOME ESG Total
Camarillo $287,475
Oxnard $1,265,000
San Buenaventura $338,845
Simi Valley 336,347
Thousand Oaks $303,521
Ventura Urban County $357,211
432
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 26 Goal Outcome
Indicator
Camarillo Oxnard San
Buenaventura
Simi
Valley
Thousand
Oaks
Ventura
Urban
County
Public Service
for
low/moderateincome other
than housing
benefit
1,495 62,500 650 600 4,000 11,000
Goal 3: Work to End Homelessness
In partnership with the Ventura County Continuum of Care, work to end homelessness within Ventura County by providing housing, emergency shelter and social services to homeless persons or those at risk of homelessness.
Priority Needs
• Supportive Services
• Homelessness
Start Year 2025 Category Homeless
End Year 2029 Geographic Area(s) All
Five Year Funding CDBG HOME ESG Total
Camarillo $1,022,453
Oxnard $385,000 $925,000
San Buenaventura $169,422
Simi Valley $168,173
Thousand Oaks $151,760
Ventura Urban County $714,421
Goal Outcome
Indicator
Camarillo Oxnard San
Buenaventura
Simi
Valley
Thousand
Oaks
Ventura
Urban
County
433
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 27 Homeless
Prevention
Tenant Based
Rental
Assistance/
Rapid
Rehousing
Homeless
Person
Overnight
Shelter
Transitional
housing beds
added
Other (Street
Outreach)
Public Service
for
low/moderateincome other
than housing
benefit
30 10
125
250
250
500
440
500
25 350
Goal 4: Create and Maintain Quality Neighborhoods
Enhance and maintain access to livable neighborhoods by improving and maintaining public facilities and infrastructure.
Priority Needs
• Public Facility Maintenance
• Street Improvements and Infrastructure
• Disaster Planning and Recovery
Start Year 2025 Category Non-Housing Community
Development
End Year 2029 Geographic Area(s) All
434
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 28 Five Year Funding CDBG HOME ESG Total
Camarillo
Oxnard $4,400,000
San Buenaventura
Simi Valley $1849,909
Thousand Oaks
Ventura Urban County $1,071,632
Goal
Outcome
Indicator
Camarillo Oxnard San
Buenaventura
Simi
Valley
Thousand
Oaks
Ventura
Urban
County
Public Facility
other than
low/moderate
income
housing
benefit
(persons
assisted)
125,000 69,725 12,875 19,265
Goal 5: Promote Economic Development
Promote economic growth and resilience in small businesses and within the workforce in targeted areas.
Priority Needs
• Economic Support for Small Businesses and Job Training Start Year 2025 Category Homeless
End Year 2029 Geographic Area(s) All
Five Year Funding CDBG HOME ESG Total
Camarillo
Oxnard $550,000
435
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 29 San Buenaventura $677,690
Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
Ventura Urban County
Goal
Outcome
Indicator
Camarillo Oxnard San
Buenaventura
Simi
Valley
Thousand
Oaks
Ventura
Urban
County
Promote
economic
development
50 25
Goal 6: Effective Administration
Maintain effective housing and community development programs to carry out HUD CPD funded programs and activities.
Priority Needs
• n/a
Start Year 2025 Category Planning and Admin
End Year 2029 Geographic Area(s) All
Five Year Funding CDBG HOME ESG Total
Camarillo $350,105
Oxnard $2,200,000 $375,000 $75,000
San Buenaventura $677,690 $196,836
Simi Valley $672,694
Thousand Oaks $607,042
Ventura Urban County $1,428,843 $610,657
Goal
Outcome
Indicator
Camarillo Oxnard San
Buenaventura
Simi
Valley
Thousand
Oaks
Ventura
Urban
County
436
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 30 Other: Program
Admin Years
5 5 5 5 5 5
Estimate the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide affordable housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2) During the course of the Consolidated Plan period, the participating grantees in the regional Consolidated Plan anticipate that affordable housing will be provided to 785 extremely low-, low-, and moderate-income households.
437
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 31 SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement
Need to Increase the Number of Accessible Units (if Required by a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement)
No PHAs in Ventura County are bound by a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement to increase the number of accessible units.
Activities to Increase Resident Involvement
Each PHA in Ventura County actively works to increase resident involvement and engagement in the planning and programming of activities and services provided by or coordinated by the PHA.
Residents participate in resident advisory groups or councils and provide recommendations to PHA leadership and the PHA’s Board of Directors on needs and issues within the community and/ or for services to better meet the needs of residents.
Is the public housing agency designated as troubled under 24 CFR part 902? None of the PHAs located in Ventura County or serving Ventura County are designated as troubled PHAs.
Plan to remove the ‘troubled’ designation
Not applicable
438
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 32 SP-55 Barriers to Affordable Housing
Barriers to Affordable Housing
A barrier to affordable housing is a public policy or nongovernmental condition that constrains the development or rehabilitation of affordable housing, such as land use controls, property taxes, state prevailing wage requirements, environmental protection, cost of land and availability of monetary resources. Barriers to affordable housing are distinguished from impediments to fair housing choice in that barriers are lawful and impediments to fair housing choice are usually unlawful.
Strategy to Remove or Ameliorate the Barriers to Affordable Housing The state of California mandates that jurisdictions include seven elements in their General Plans:
land use, transportation, conservation, noise, open space, safety, and housing. Two of these elements – the Housing and Land Use Elements – can directly impact local housing markets because they define key parameters for housing development such as permitted density, required fees, and allowable zoning uses.
The Housing Element details a local government’s strategy to address their jurisdiction’s housing needs and regulate existing and future housing development. In California, the state outlines statutory requirements for each community’s Housing Element which are then subject to review by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for compliance with state law.
Enacted in 1969, the Housing Element law requires that local governments adequately plan to meet the existing and projected housing needs of all economic segments of the community. The law acknowledges that for the private market to adequately address housing needs and demand, local governments must adopt land use plans and regulatory systems that provide opportunities for and do not unduly constrain housing development. Specifically, the Housing Element must:
• Identify adequate sites which will be made available through appropriate zoning and development standards and with services and facilities needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels in order to meet the community’s housing goals;
• Assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of low- and moderateincome households; • Address, and where appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing; • Conserve and improve the condition of the existing affordable housing stock; and • Promote housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status, disability, sexual orientation, gender identification, or any other arbitrary factor.
The Land Use Element of the General Plan also influences housing choice by defining allowable uses within the jurisdiction by designating allowable densities and land uses for various zoning districts across the community including residential, commercial, industrial, public, and agricultural zones.
As it applies to housing, the Land Use Element establishes a range of residential land use categories, 439
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 33 specifies densities (typically expressed as dwelling units per acre) and suggests the types of housing appropriate in a community. While the Land Use Element establishes different zones with specified parameters for residential development, it is a jurisdiction’s local zoning ordinance which details the specific development standards for the community. In other words, the Land Use Element serves as a guiding framework for a community’s land use policy while the zoning ordinance is the explicit code that lays out permitted uses within each zone.
A Housing Element within a General Plan approved by the State of California should, in theory, allow the private market to create enough housing units at various price levels to meet the jurisdiction’s affordable housing needs.
440
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 34 SP-60 Homelessness Strategy
Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs
The Ventura County Continuum of Care (CoC) provides oversight and coordination for homeless services in the county. The Coordinated Entry System, Pathways to Home, provides referrals and linkages to appropriate resources through a “no-wrong door” approach. The CoC is partnering with healthcare providers, youth outreach teams, Veteran service providers and other community partners to link-in to the Coordinated Entry System (CES) for broader coverage and increased ease of access for people in need of services. The Homeless Management Information System hosts the CES and referral process.
The 2023 and 2024 PIT Counts found that 202 fewer people experienced unsheltered homelessness in 2024 than 2023. The total number of persons experiencing homelessness (sheltered and unsheltered combined) declined by 83 persons during this same period.
The County of Ventura is committed to being a place where all are welcome, where people are supported and where everyone has an opportunity to thrive. It will do so by coordinating with County partners, including the CoC, local businesses, community faith groups, and nonprofits to engage the homeless population.
Addressing the emergency and transitional housing needs of homeless persons Emergency and transitional needs of homeless persons are addressed via the use of a coordinated entry process to prioritize homeless persons.
Within the County of Ventura, the following emergency shelters operate year round. • Ventura County Rescue Mission: Serves single men; 10-15 bed capacity • Lighthouse Women’s and Children’s Mission: Serves single women and mothers with children; 21 bed capacity
• Gabriel’s House Women’s Shelter: Serves single women and women with children; 20 bed capacity
• Our Place Shelter: Serves single men and women; 10 bed capacity • ARCH Ventura: Serves single men and women; 55 bed capacity • Harvard Shelter: Serves Santa Paula, Fillmore and Piru residents only; 42 bed capacity • Thrive Grove: Serves Thousand Oaks; 30 bed capacity; anticipated to open in 2025 The County uses a blend of transitional housing properties and a bridge housing model for transitional housing; placing homeless households in motels and scattered site leased apartments as a pathway to permanent housing.
441
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 35 Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again.
The CoC works with organizations to reach and serve as many groups as possible and address barriers to permanent housing. Organizations who serve those experiencing homelessness include domestic violence service providers, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ) organizations, criminal justice systems, healthcare partners, behavioral health providers, and mainstream service providers that serve families and individuals.
In the CoC’s 2024 Report on the State of Homelessness, it reported that of the 6,060 persons served during 2023, 57% were placed in permanent housing, 96% retained housing.
The CoC established a goal of limiting the average length of time homeless to 90 days for Emergency Shelter and 180 days for Transitional Housing. The actual length of homelessness was 210 days for Emergency Shelter and 224 days for Transitional Housing. The CoC is continuing to establish pathways to reduce these time periods.
Help low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely lowincome individuals and families who are likely to become homeless after being discharged from a publicly funded institution or system of care, or who are receiving assistance from public and private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs.
The CoC has established a goal of placing 85% of all persons served into permanent housing and ensuring that 85% of those placed retain those housing. To achieve this goal, the CoC ensures robust outreach, engagement and wrap around services and case management to serve those in need of and placed in housing.
442
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 36 SP-65 Lead-Based Paint Hazards
Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards.
Actions undertaken by Ventura County to remediate lead-based paint hazards and reduce instances of lead poisoning adhere to the HUD lead-based paint regulations implementing Title X of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, which covered CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA, and 24 CFR Part 35, which covers HTF. The State of California has also enacted legislation which deems a building to be in violation of the State Housing Law if it contains lead hazards and requires local enforcement agencies to enforce provisions related to lead hazards; makes it a crime for a person to engage in specified acts related to lead hazard evaluation and abatement, unless certified or accredited by the state; and allows local enforcement agencies to order the abatement of lead hazards or issue a cease and desist order in response to lead hazards.
Following the declaration by the state that childhood lead exposure was the most significant childhood environmental health problem in California, Ventura County established the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention (CLPP) program within its Health Care Agency to reduce the incidence of childhood lead exposure. The CLPP program provides a variety of medical and environmental services, including blood testing, home inspections, and lead testing, intended to prevent children from being exposed to lead, reduce the harmful effects of lead poisoning, and prevent environmental exposure to lead through community outreach and education.
In March 2011, Ventura County joined with 10 cities and counties as a plaintiff on behalf of the state in a public nuisance lawsuit against three lead paint manufacturers to address lead-based paint hazards in housing built prior to 1951. The suit was settled in 2018, and in November 2019, the county received the first of what will eventually be a $7.6 million settlement. The funds, used to capitalize the new Healthy Homes Ventura County Program, will initially be used to identify and abate leadbased paint hazards on homes built before 1950, and will be expanded to include the homes built between 1951 and 1980.
The testing and abatement of lead-based paint, an important element of the housing rehabilitation activities undertaken by Ventura County, supplement ongoing efforts to increase the availability of safe and affordable housing in the county.
How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards? Over time through testing and abatement, monitoring of public health data, and through public education, the public will have greater awareness of the hazards of lead-based paint to children. This will prompt homeowners, landlords, and parents of young children to proactively address unsafe housing conditions in pre-1978 units where children may potentially be exposed to lead-based paint hazards.
How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures? Lead hazard reduction and compliance with HUD’s lead-based paint regulations are integral components of Ventura County’s affordable housing policies and procedures. Rental and owneroccupied housing receiving federal assistance are required to comply with federal and state 443
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 37 regulations. Properties proposed for acquisition, repair, or rehabilitation through the CDBG and HOME programs are assessed for lead hazards and, if hazards are discovered, are handled in accordance with these regulations and property owners counseled on abatement options.
Requirements for compliance with these regulations are included as provisions in all development and sub-recipient agreements with the potential to encounter lead paint hazards. The owners of rental properties built before 1978 are required to provide households of prospective tenants with a completed disclosure form before the tenant is obligated to lease the rental unit. 444
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 38 SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy
Jurisdiction Goals, Programs and Policies for reducing the number of Poverty-Level Families.
To meaningfully address this challenge, each of the goals included in the Strategic Plan supports activities to promote the availability of affordable housing and the provision of essential services that directly benefit low- and moderate-income residents. In the implementation of the Strategic Plan, the jurisdictions in the County will prioritize funding for activities that most effectively address these goals over the next five years. This strategy will emphasize using CDBG, HOME and ESG funds to help individuals and families rise out of poverty to long-term self-sufficiency.
The Ventura County Region has a variety of programs that can also be leveraged to reduce the number of poverty-level families, often involving partnerships between organizations. Examples of programming include:
• Medi-Cal and CalFresh, through the state of California, provide medical insurance and food assistance through Ventura County Human Services Agency. • Ventura County Library READ Adult Literacy Program partners trained volunteers to work with adults on literacy skills.
• Local school districts offer free lunch to children during the summer months when many low-income children are separated from school-provided meals during the academic year. The Summer Nutrition Program also partners with the Ventura County Library and YMCA to reach low-income communities.
• The Ventura County Human Services Agency General Relief program provides temporary financial assistance to low-income adults with no dependent children. General Relief helps with basic living needs including rent, utilities, and incidentals. • The Workforce Investment Board (WIB) of Ventura County offers support that would be costly for individuals or businesses to receive from other sources. The WIB provides guidance for individuals exploring career options or experiencing job transitions, and employers seeking support for recruitment, retention, or layoffs at the County Human Services Agency job and career centers in Santa Paula, Oxnard, Simi Valley, and San Buenaventura.
How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this affordable housing plan?
Ventura County and the entitlement jurisdictions allocate up to 15 percent of their CDBG funds annually to public and nonprofit service providers to offer a range of supportive services, including those that aim at fighting poverty. Many of these agencies also provide assistance with securing affordable housing. ESG funding is also devoted to shelter and services for homeless or nearhomeless residents with the goal of all homeless individuals and families achieving stable housing. 445
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 39 SP-80 Monitoring
Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements
Camarillo:
The city conducts monitoring reviews of selected activities to determine whether the programs are carried out in accordance with its Consolidated Plan and in a timely fashion. Monitoring is carried out on a regular basis to ensure that statutory and regulatory requirements are met. The city aims to monitor all subrecipients via on-visits annually.
The city uses various tools to evaluate the success of its programs in meeting local housing and community development needs. HUD requires that the city submit annual reports on its performance in carrying out the program goals in the CAPER for the CDBG program. The CAPER must report annual and cumulative accomplishments in achieving the goals and objectives established in the Consolidated Plan. As part of this process, if the city detects underperforming programs and agencies, the city will take action(s) to identify the issues and explore options for remedies.
The city disburses CDBG funds to subrecipients only after they provide a quarterly Request for Reimbursement and Report (report). The report indicates the number and type of clients served including income, race, and ethnicity. Other information may be required based on the National Objective being met and the Matrix Code assigned to the activity. This information may include a designation of which presumed eligible group the client belongs to and if it is a female-headed household. The report must also contain documentation of expenditures and a narrative description of activities undertaken. The final quarterly report and a Year-End Report are submitted in July. The city issues final payment for Public Service activities in August when possible, but if questions arise about the final report or Year-End report the city works with the subrecipient to resolve them.
Subrecipients are only paid only after the city has confirmed the accuracy and completeness of the report. Funds are drawn down from the city’s letter of credit using the IDIS program only after subrecipients have been paid. In some cases, this process may extend into September, but in all cases final payments to subrecipients and draws are completed prior to the submission of the CAPER.
Oxnard:
The City of Oxnard monitors the use of grant funds through financial management, desk monitoring, on-site monitoring, and providing technical assistance. Monitoring is intended to ensure program compliance with the federal regulations and program performance goals and accomplishment reporting standards. In addition, the city monitors for compliance with fiscal regulations, labor compliance, section 3 compliance, procurement and purchasing and environmental review. During monitoring, a risk assessment is conducted to determine high risk subrecipients and projects to perform on-site monitoring. Staff reviews client information, financial records and internal operating policies to ensure continued program success, as well as, meeting HUD and State guidelines as 446
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 40 required by each individual grant. The City requires CDBG & HESG quarterly and annual reports to ensure the subrecipients are meeting their goals and objectives.
The City monitors Home funded projects loans for homebuyer down payment assistance, homeowner rehabilitation loans/grants, community housing development projects (CHDO) homebuyer and rental projects, and units designated as affordable by the planning department. Staff monitors for owner occupancy mostly for homeowner, homebuyer loans and deed-restricted units during the affordability period. Rental projects are mostly HOME-funded with CHDO Set-Aside funds. Staff monitors HOME-Assisted units in the rental projects throughout the HOME affordability period utilizing the HOME Monitoring Checklists. Staff monitors affordable density bonus projects for compliance with applicable state and local regulations. Staff certifies developers eligible for CHDO Set Aside funds, reviews project applications and determines project feasibility.
San Buenaventura:
The city of San Buenaventura conducts desk monitoring reviews for all subrecipients through a required monthly and quarterly report. On-site visits occur with approximately half of the CDBG subrecipients annually to review activities that represent different project categories (public services, facilities and infrastructure, and economic development).
The city's CDBG and HOME programs require contractors to include outreach and opportunities to minority and women business enterprises (M/WBE) within the bids they submit to the city, including a request for contractors to market this requirement to M/WBEs and disadvantaged businesses, in support of HUD's goal of expanding economic opportunities.
Simi Valley:
During the program year, subrecipients are required to submit quarterly and year-end reports to monitor program and project progress toward stated goals. Reports included information on program beneficiaries (including race or ethnicity) and identified performance measures in meeting projected goals. Reimbursement requests with supporting documentation are submitted quarterly.
Organizations are also required to identify the sources and amount of leveraged funds and their use within listed programs.
The City uses the information supplied in quarterly and year-end reports to complete desktop monitoring of subrecipients to ensure project accomplishments and expenditures are consistent with approved work schedules and line item budgets. City CDBG program staff also conduct annual on-site monitoring. On-site monitoring covers the areas of intake and client files, financial records, income verification eligibility, and presumed benefit documentation compliance as applicable.
Thousand Oaks:
The City of Thousand Oaks conducts monitoring activities to ensure that Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds are used in accordance with federal regulations and that the programs funded meet their established goals and objectives. The City reports the accomplishments of CDBG activities to HUD through the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). 447
Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan – DRAFT Strategic Plan - 41 Before approving any CDBG activities, the City performs National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews. The City performs quarterly desktop monitoring of public service grants and conducts site monitoring of at least 10% of its CDBG-funded subrecipients annually. During these site reviews, the CDBG activities are assessed against the City’s CDBG Monitoring Checklist, as outlined in the City’s CDBG monitoring manual.
As part of the monitoring process, the City checks for program income and confirms that contractors and subcontractors are eligible participants in federally funded contracts by reviewing the System for Award Management (SAM) database.
Additionally, for CDBG projects, the City ensures that all applicable federal prevailing wage and Section 3 requirements are met by subrecipients. For apartment rehabilitation activities, the City also monitors compliance with affordable rent standards as published by the Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura and HUD's published income limits.
Ventura Urban County:
Planned monitoring of Ventura County CDBG-funded projects varies depending upon a risk analysis of the subrecipient and type of project or program (i.e. construction, economic development, public service, etc.). While the county’s program monitoring is almost always intended to ensure program compliance, it may also entail measures to improve program performance. Monitoring may be for compliance with fiscal regulations, program performance, the Fair Labor Standards Act (DavisBacon), and/or environmental review.
During fiscal monitoring, the county reviews monthly Expense Summary (ES) documents received from the participating jurisdictions and subrecipients. Expenditures in the ES are reviewed to ensure compliance with cost eligibility and allocation regulations. Single audits are provided by subrecipients and reviewed as necessary. All projects are routinely monitored to ensure that no more than 1.5 times the annual CDBG grant is in the Count’s line of credit on April 30th of each year.
During performance monitoring, county staff review CDBG Quarterly Status Reports (QSRs) to ensure program performance is adequate and timely compared to the goals stated in the County’s HUD Annual and Consolidated Plans. QSRs are completed by all subrecipients and include information on milestones, status and accomplishments. Additional technical assistance is provided to new subrecipients to ensure proper beneficiary collection and reporting.
The county monitors HOME-funded projects at the following times to ensure compliance with HOME program requirements: 1) During construction; 2) Upon completion of construction; and 3) Annually during the affordability period. On-site monitoring for each HOME project occurs every three years.
The Ventura County CoC has adopted written standards for CoC and ESG funding. CoC and County staff monitor ESG-funded programs through desk monitoring, on-site monitoring, and provide technical assistance to program-funded providers. ESG projects are monitored annually at minimum. Subrecipients of all ESG- funded projects are required to provide quarterly status reports which include performance data and narrative about program challenges and success. 448
Appendix 1:
Invited Stakeholders
The following list of stakeholders were invited to participate in the development of the Consolidated Plan. These stakeholders received invitations to participate in the survey, community meetings and stakeholder focus group sessions.
Agency Subject Area Additional Subject Area (if applicable) Abode Communities Housing
Adelante Comunidad Conejo Inc Services-Children Services-Elderly Aedis Real Estate Group Housing
Alliant Strategic Development Housing
Alzheimer’s Association Services-Elderly
AMCAL Housing
American Red Cross Ventura County Health Agency Services-Health Area Agency on Aging Services-Elderly
Area Housing Authority of the County
of Ventura
PHA Housing
Assistance League of Conejo Valley Services-Children Services-Elderly Big Brothers Big Sisters of Ventura
Co, Inc.
Services-Children
BikeVentura Other
Blanchard Community Library Public Funded Institution
Boys & Girls Club of Moorpark Services-Children
Boys & Girls Club of Oxnard & Port
Hueneme
Services-Children
Boys & Girls Club of Santa Clara
Valley
Services-Children
Boys & Girls Club of Ventura Services-Children
449
Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater
Conejo Valley
Services-Education Services-Children
Brain Injury Center Other
Cabrillo Economic Development
Corporation
Assisted Housing Services-Housing
California Lutheran University Services-Education Regional Organization California Rural Legal Assistance Services-Fair Housing California State University Channel
Islands (CSUCI)
Public Funded Institution Services-Education
Camarillo Health Care District Services-Health Services-HIV/AIDS Camarillo Old Town Association Business Leader Business Leader Camarillo Premium Outlets Business Leader Other
Caregivers: Volunteers Assisting the
Elderly
Services-Elderly Services-Disabilities
Casa Conejo Municipal Advisory
Council
Local Government
CASA Court Appointed Special
Advocates
Services-Children
Casa Pacifica-Centers for Children &
Families
Services-Children Services - Unaccompanied Youth
Catholic Charities of Ventura County Services-Homeless Services-Elderly CEDC Housing Services-Housing
Century Housing Housing
Channel Islands Social Services Services-Disabilities Services-Health Citizens Advisory Committee - For
Former Ventura Youth Correctional
Facility
Civic Leader Services - Unaccompanied Youth
City Impact Services-Education Services-Children
City of Camarillo Local Government
City of Fillmore Local Government
City of Moorpark Local Government
City of Ojai Local Government
450
City of Oxnard Local Government
City of Port Hueneme Local Government
City of San Buenaventura Local Government
City of Santa Paula Local Government
City of Simi Valley Local Government
City of Thousand Oaks Local Government
City of Thousand Oaks Community
Services
Local Government Services-Homeless
City of Thousand Oaks Emergency
Services
Local Government Emergency Management Agency
City of Thousand Oaks Planning
Division
Local Government Planning Organization
City of Thousand Oaks Public Works
Department
Local Government Water District/Agency
City of Ventura Local Government Planning Organization
Clinicas Del Camino Real Services-Health
Coasts 2 Coast Camps (Formerly
Pacific Camps Family Resource, Inc.)
Services-Children Child Welfare Agency
Community Action of Ventura Co.
Inc.
Services-Housing Services-Children
Community Conscience Business Leader Regional Organization Community Development Partners Housing
Community Memorial Health System Health Agency Services-Health Community of Friends Housing
Conejo Community Outreach Services-Children
Conejo Conscience Other
Conejo Free Clinic Health Agency Services-Health
Conejo Future Apartments Housing Services-Elderly
Conejo Hospice, Inc. Services-Elderly Services-Children Conejo Open Space Conservation
Agency
Public Land Agency Planning Organization
451
Conejo Recreation and Park District Local Government Services-Children Conejo Simi Moorpark Assoc. of
Realtors
Business Leader Regional Organization
Conejo Valley Senior Concerns Services-Elderly Services-Disabilities Conejo Valley Senior Concerns, Inc. Services-Elderly Services-Disabilities Conejo Valley Village Services-Elderly Services-Housing Conejo/Las Virgenes Futures
Foundation
Regional Organization Civic Leader
Corporation for Better Housing (Casa
Bella)
Housing
County of Ventura Local Government
County of Ventura Board of
Supervisor
Civic Leader Local Government
County of Ventura CEO Community
Development Division
Local Government Housing
County of Ventura Human Services
Agency
Local Government Continuum of Care
Court Appointed Special Advocates
(CASA)
Services-Children
Dignity Moves Housing Services-Homeless
EAH Housing Housing
Easterseals of Southern California Services-Disabilities Regional Organization Economic Development
Collaborative
Business Leader Regional Organization
EDC-VC Planning Organization Business Leader
El Concilio Del Condado de Ventura Services-Children
Family Justice Center Services – Victims of
Domestic Violence
Fillmore-Piru Veterans Memorial
District
Regional Organization
FOOD Share, Inc. Other Services-Homeless
Future Leaders of America Services-Children
452
Global Premier Development Housing
Goodwill Industries, Inc. Other
Greater Conejo Valley Chamber of
Commerce
Business Leader Regional Organization
Grey Law Services-Elderly Services-Housing
Habitat for Humanity Ventura County Housing Services-Housing Harbor House Services-Homeless
HDSI Management, Inc Housing Services-Housing
HELP of Ojai Services-Elderly Other
HOLOS Housing
Home Ownership for Personal
Empowerment (HOPE)
Services-Housing
Hope the Mission Services-Homeless Services - Homeless Veterans House Farmworkers Services-Housing Other
Housing Authority – City of Oxnard PHA
Housing Authority – City of Port
Hueneme
PHA
Housing Authority – City of Santa
Paula
PHA
Housing Authority of the City of San
Buenaventura
PHA Assisted Housing
Housing Rights Center Services-Fair Housing
Housing Trust Fund Ventura County Housing Regional Organization Independent Living Resource Center Services-Children
Interface Services -
Unaccompanied Youth
Services-Victims of Domestic Violence
Jamboree Housing Housing
James Storehouse Services-Children
Junior Achievement Services
KEYS Leadership Program Services-Children
Kids & Families Together Services-Children
453
Kingdom Center Services-Homeless
Kiwanis Club of Camarillo Regional Organization Services-Children Law Office of Barbara Macri-Ortiz Services-Fair Housing Life Centers of Ventura Co Services-Health
Lighthouse Bible Church (formerly)
Cochran Street Baptist
Other
LINChousing Housing
Livingston Memorial Visiting Nurse
Assoc.
Services-Health Services-Elderly
Livingston Memorial Visiting Nurse
Association
Health Agency Services-Disabilities
Livingston Memorial Visiting Nurses
Assoc.
Serivces
Long Term Care Services Services-Disabilities Services-Elderly Lutheran Social Services Services-Homeless
Manna Food Bank Services-Elderly Services-Disabilities
Many Mansions Housing Services-Housing
Meadowlark Service League Regional Organization Other
Mercy House Services-Homeless
Mesa Services-Homeless Services - Unaccompanied Youth
MICOP Other
Mid Valley Properties Housing
Mission Without Borders Services-Children Other
Mitec Solutions Broadband ISP Broadband Advocates
Momentum Housing Services-Disabilities
Moorpark Chamber of Commerce Local Government
Moorpark College Civic Leader
Mother Teresa Christian Services -
St. Rose Church
Other
National Health Foundation Health Agency Services-Health 454
Nichols Planning & Development Planning Organization
Oak Park Municipal Advisory Council Local Government
Oak View Park and Resource Center Other
One Step A La Vez Services-Children
Oxnard Performing Arts Center Other
Palmer Drug Abuse Program Services-Disabilities Mental Health Agency/Facility PATH Housing
PDAP of Ventura County, Inc. Services-Children Services-Health People’s Self Help Housing Corp Housing Services-Housing Piru Neighborhood Council Regional Organization
PLACE (WAV) Housing
Project Understanding Services-Homeless Services-Children Prototypes Women's Center Mental Health
Agency/Facility
Services-Children
RAIN Project Services-Homeless
Rancho Simi Rec. & Park District Local Government
Rebuilding Green Housing
Rebuilding Together Ventura County Services-Housing Regional Organization Rescue Mission Alliance Mental Health
Agency/Facility
Services-Children
Retirement Housing Foundation Services-Elderly
River Community Church Services-Homeless Civic Leader
Safe Passage Youth Foundation Services-Children Services-Housing Saint Vincent de Paul Other
Salvation Army Corps Ventura Services-Homeless
Samaritan Center of Simi Valley Services
Santa Paula Senior Center Services-Elderly
Santa Rosa Valley Municipal Advisory
Council
Local Government
Sarah's House Maternity Home Services
455
Saticoy Sanitary District Water District/Agency
SCANPH Services
Senior Alliance for Empowerment Services-Elderly Services-Housing Senior Concerns Services-Elderly
Seventh Day Adventist Church Other
Simi at the Garden Other
Simi Covenant Church Other
Simi Valley Chamber of Commerce Economic Development
Simi Valley Adult School Services
Simi Valley Disabled American
Veterans Chapter 55
Services
Simi Valley Education Foundation Services
Simi Valley Elks Lodge Civic Leader
Simi Valley Family YMCA Services
Simi Valley Historical Society &
Museum
Other
Simi Valley Hospital Foundation Civic Leader
Simi Valley Second Missionary
Baptist Church
Other
Simi Valley Unified School District Services
Somis Municipal Advisory Council Local Government
Spirit of Santa Paula Services-Homeless
St. Peter Claver Church Other
St. Vincent de Paul Services-Housing Services-Elderly
Step Up on Second Services-Homeless Services-Housing
StoneBridge Community Church Other
T.L.C. Home Hospice Services-Elderly
The Arc of Ventura Services-Homeless Services-Disabilities The City Center Services-Homeless Assisted Housing
Tri Counties Regional Center Services-Disabilities
456
Trinity Lutheran Church Other
Turning Point Foundation Mental Health
Agency/Facility
Services-Homeless
United Church of Christ Services
United Methodist Church Services
United Way of Ventura County Services-Homeless Services-Children Upwards Services-Children
USA Properties Fund Housing
Vast Homes Housing
VC Area Agency on Aging Services-Elderly
VC Economic Development Assoc. Regional Organization
VC Public Health HIV/AIDS Center Services-Health Services-HIV/AIDS Ventura Chamber of Commerce Business Leader Civic Leader Ventura Climate Care Options
Organized Locally (VCCool)
Other
Ventura Co Community Foundation Regional Organization
Ventura Co Special Olympics Services
Ventura Co. Community
Development Corp (VCCDC)
Housing Services-Housing
Ventura Co. Fire Protection Agency Local Government
Ventura Co. Harbor Dept Local Government
Ventura Co. Library Local Government
Ventura Co. Probation Agency Local Government
Ventura Co. Public Works Agency Local Government
Ventura Co. RMA - Code Enforcement Local Government
Ventura Co. RMA - Planning Local Government Planning Organization Ventura Co. VCBH Local Government Mental Health Agency/Facility Ventura College Services-Education
Ventura County Area Agency on Aging Services
Ventura County Board of Supervisors Local Government
457
Ventura County Community
Development Corporation
Services-Housing Regional Organization
Ventura County Continuum of Care Continuum of Care Services-Homeless Ventura County Department of Child
Support Services
Child Welfare Agency Local Government
Ventura County Health Care Agency Health Agency Services-Homeless Ventura County Homeless & Housing
Coalition
Services-Homeless Services-Housing
Ventura County Housing Trust Fund Housing
Ventura County Office of Education Services-Education
Ventura County Public Works Local Government
Ventura County Rescue Mission Local Government
Ventura County Transportation
Commission
Local Government Planning Organization
Ventura Land Trust Public Land Agency Regional Organization Ventura Police Department Emergency Management
Agency
Local Government
Villa Esperanza Services Services-Disabilities Services-Children Vulnerable Population Housing
Advocacy Network
Services-Homeless Services - Homeless Veterans
Wakeland Housing Housing
WeeCare Inc., (DBA Upwards) Services-Children
Wespac Management Group, Inc Housing Services-Housing
Westminster Free Clinic Services-Health
Westside Community Development
Corporation
Public Funded Institution Regional Organization
Women of Substance & Men of Honor Foster Care
Agency/Facility
Housing
Women’s Economic Ventures Services-Employment
Workforce Development Board Services-Employment
Workforce Development Board of VC Services-Employment
YMCA Southeast Ventura County Services-Children Services-Education 458
459
1. Where do you live?
Camarillo 20
Fillmore 1
Moorpark 60
Ojai 4
Oxnard 62
Port Hueneme 2
Santa Paula 5
Simi Valley 37
Thousand Oaks 51
Ventura 39
Somis 0
Saticoy 0
Piru 1
Unincorporated Areas (adjacent
to or within any city) 10
Ventura County | Resident Survey
1/5
Appendix 2: Resident Survey Results
460
2. Does your household's income adequately support your household's needs?
3. In the last 5 years, have you felt unfairly treated based on your age, race, color, religion, sex (includin g gender identity and sexual orientation), familial status, national origin, or disability? (This does not i nclude lack of required income or credit when applying for a loan or apartment.) I/we have adequate income 136
My/our income just barely covers our needs 118
I/we don't have enough income to pay housing and
other costs of living
38 Applying for rental housing 26
Applying for a mortgage 11
Applying for a credit card 9
Applying for a job 37
Getting served at a business 29
I haven't been negatively
impacted by discrimination. 217
Ventura County | Resident Survey
2/5
461
4. Do you think that more programs are needed to assist the following people? Homeless or people at risk of
homelessness 156
People with disabilities 125
Seniors 152
Veterans 95
Single parents 120
Youth 116
Farmworkers 89
Victims of domestic violence
or human traficking 118
None. There is adequate
assistance for all groups 12
Other 58
Ventura County | Resident Survey
3/5
462
5. Choose 3 areas where you think your City and County should focus financial resources.
6. What do you believe is the best approach to increasing affordable housing opportunities in Ventura C ounty?
Build more affordable housing 118
Build more housing for the
homeless 53
Economic development and
employment opportunities 100
Financial assistance (eviction
prevention, car repair, utility… 58
Home purchase assistance 52
Home repair program for lowincome homeowners 52
Human service programs,
such as providing counselin… 92
Improve access to
government or non-profit… 20
Improve conditions in lowincome neighborhoods, suc… 44 Improve conditions or services
of public facilities such as… 51
Job training 64
Renovate non-profit facilities,
such as homeless shelters an… 22
Services for the homeless and
those at risk of homelessness 74
New construction of rental
units 20
New construction of
homeowner units 19
Convert vacant buildings into
rental units 93
Purchase and renovate existing
rental properties and… 51
Rent and security deposit
assistance 26
Homebuyer downpayment/
closing cost assistance 30
Other 53
Ventura County | Resident Survey
4/5
463
7. What do you like most about living in Ventura County? Ventura County | Resident Survey
https://forms.office.com/Pages/DesignPageV2.aspx?prevorigin=shell&origin=NeoPortalPage&subpage=design&id=utDYO9ST_keAv_TpqkkSDBjfhQf… 5/5 county weather community
people
Family city safe
Open Spaces
areas
Ventura Sense of community Low crime
quality of life LA County
great weather community and proximity
city and the county
small community safer than other countys
friendly community
464
DRAFT - April 2025
2025-2029 Regional Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing
465
Ventura County
Regional Analysis of Impediments to
Fair Housing Choice
2025
466
Table of Contents
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................1 II. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION PROCESS ......................................................................................2 A. STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION ............................................................................................................ 2 B. PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT PERIOD ................................................................................................ 3 III. FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS ...........................................................................................................3 A. DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING SUMMARY............................................................................................... 3 B. SEGREGATION/INTEGRATION............................................................................................................. 13 C. RACIALLY OR ETHNICALLY CONCENTRATED AREAS OF POVERTY (R/ECAPS).................................................. 24 D. DISPARITIES IN ACCESS TO OPPORTUNITY............................................................................................. 30 E. DISPROPORTIONATE HOUSING NEEDS................................................................................................. 59 F. LOCAL AND STATE POLICIES AND PRACTICES IMPACTING FAIR HOUSING....................................................... 67 IV. FAIR HOUSING ISSUES AND GOALS ..........................................................................................70 A. FAIR HOUSING ISSUES .................................................................................................................... 70 B. FAIR HOUSING GOALS .................................................................................................................... 72 467
Ventura County Regional AI 1
I. Executive Summary
The Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) provides communities an opportunity to examine progress toward the goals of eliminating housing discrimination and providing current and future residents access to housing opportunity. The AI provides important information on fair housing issues, contributing factors, and goals to policymakers, administrative staff, housing providers, lenders, and fair housing advocates throughout Ventura County. Jurisdictions that receive funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), including Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investments Partnership Program (HOME), and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds, complete an AI at least once every three to five years, consistent with the Consolidated Plan cycle, as part of their obligations under the Community Development Act of 1974 and the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act.
The AI is a key component of the requirement for all HUD grantees to affirmatively further fair housing. Affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics. The duty to affirmatively further fair housing extends to all of a jurisdictions’ activities and programs relating to housing and urban development.
This AI is a collaborative effort between the HUD Entitlement Cities of Camarillo, Oxnard, San Buenaventura (Ventura), Simi Valley, and Thousand Oaks, and the Ventura Urban County including the Cities of Fillmore, Moorpark, Ojai, Port Hueneme, Santa Paula, and the Unincorporated areas of Ventura County. This document is an update to the 2020 Ventura County Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. In general, the data presented in this document is for the region as a whole.
To prepare the AI, jurisdictions first must identify fair housing issues. A fair housing issue is a condition in a specific geographic area of analysis that restricts fair housing choice or access to opportunity. Fair housing issues can include such conditions as ongoing local or regional segregation or lack of integration, racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, disproportionate housing needs, and evidence of discrimination or violations of civil rights law or regulations related to housing. To identify fair housing issues, HUD recommends that jurisdictions gather and analyze data. For this AI, the jurisdictions analyzed data on the following topics:
• Demographics
• Segregation/Integration
• Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty • Disparities in Access to Opportunity
• Housing Needs
468
Ventura County Regional AI 2
The data utilized in the analysis are from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) and HUD’s AFFH Data and Mapping Tool. The ACS data utilized in the assessment are from the 2016-2020 five-year estimates. This data set was selected to align with the data utilized in the Consolidated Plan.
After conducting the data analysis and identifying the fair housing issues, a list of contributing factors is developed. A contributing factor is a factor that creates, contributes to, perpetuates, or increases the severity of one or more fair housing issues. For each fair housing issue and its contributing factors, the jurisdictions then develop a list of fair housing goals. A fair housing goal is a specific, meaningful action that can reasonably be expected to achieve a material positive change that affirmatively furthers fair housing by increasing fair housing choice or decreasing disparities in access to opportunity.
For the contributing factors and fair housing goals in this AI, the jurisdictions drew from the extensive work they have done to prepare their most recent Housing Elements, which cover the period of 2021-2029. As part of the state-mandated Housing Element, California jurisdictions must conduct a fair housing assessment that includes an analysis of fair housing issues, identification of factors that create and/or contribute to those issues, and development of goals and meaningful actions to affirmatively further fair housing. Progress towards reaching the goals identified in the Housing Element must then be reported to the state periodically.
A summary of the fair housing issues, significant contributing factors, and fair housing goals can be found in section IV of this AI.
II. Community Participation Process
To develop the AI, information was also gathered from residents, housing professionals, and service providers. Incorporating information from these sources is important for ensuring that the AI captures community needs and knowledge that may not be discernible from other data sources. The community participation process for this AI involved the following efforts:
A. Stakeholder Consultation
Interviews were conducted during November-December 2024 with organizations that provide fair housing services and/or housing and services to protected class groups in the county. The interviews focused on the fair housing issues frequently encountered by the organizations, the underlying causes for those issues, any efforts that are currently underway to address those issues and their causes, as well as any additional actions the organizations would recommend to address those issues. The organizations interviewed were California Rural Legal Assistance, House Farm Workers, and the Housing Rights Center.
469
Ventura County Regional AI 3
B. Community Meetings and Survey
As part of its outreach efforts, Ventura County held a series of in person and remote community meetings throughout the County from October – December 2024. In these meetings, residents were offered opportunities to provide input on existing needs and recommended actions in the community.
Date Time Location City
10/7/2024 2:00 pm Camarillo
Library
Camarillo
10/8/2024 1:00 pm Community
Meeting
Room
Ventura City
10/9/2024 5:30 pm Council
Chambers
Santa Paula
10/10/2024 1:00 pm Community
Room
Simi Valley
10/10/2024 6:00 pm Newbury
Park Library
Thousand
Oaks
10/17/2024 6:00 pm South
Oxnard
Center
Oxnard
10/18/2024 6:00 pm Remote
10/19/2024 1:00 pm Remote
10/29/2024 3:00pm Camarillo
Library
Camarillo
12/18/2024 6:00pm Oxnard City
Council
Chambers
Oxnard
The County facilitated a community survey to gather input on community and housing needs and conditions. 292 residents within the County responded to the survey.
III. Fair Housing Analysis
A. Demographic and Housing Summary
Describe demographic patterns and trends over time.
Table 1 – Demographics, shows demographic information for the population of Ventura County and the participating jurisdictions of Camarillo, Oxnard, San Buenaventura, Simi Valley, and Thousand Oaks. These data are from the Census Bureau’s 2016-2020 American 470
Ventura County Regional AI 4
Community Survey 5-year Estimates. Table 2 – Demographic Trends shows similar data over time, going back to 1990. These tables show the following:
Population:
The County has a total population of 845,599. Approximately 75% of the County’s population resides in the five participating jurisdictions. Camarillo is the smallest of the participating cities, with a population of 68,583. Oxnard is the largest, with a population of 207,722. San Buenaventura, Simi Valley, and Thousand Oaks have populations of 108,467, 125,768, and 127,648, respectively.
Race/Ethnicity:
The County’s population is majority-minority. The largest population group is White, nonHispanic (44.9%), followed by Hispanic (42.8%). Asian and Pacific Islanders (AAPI) comprise
7.3% and African Americans comprise 1.7% of the County’s population.
Hispanic and AAPI residents are driving population growth. Since 1990, the number of Hispanic and AAPI residents has grown substantially, while the number of White, nonHispanic residents has declined. Over this same time period, the number of African Americans increased slightly between 1990-2010 before falling back to just below 1990 levels by 2020.
The racial/ethnic composition of the participating jurisdictions varies:
• Camarillo has a majority White, non-Hispanic population (56%), with a smaller Hispanic population (29.1%) and a larger AAPI population (8.8%) than the County as a whole. Since 1990, the Hispanic and AAPI populations in Camarillo have grown substantially.
• Oxnard’s population is 75% Hispanic and 13.6% White, non-Hispanic. The AAPI population is slightly less than in the County overall (7%) and the African American population is slightly more (2.1%). Since 1990, the Hispanic population in Oxnard has doubled. The AAPI population has also grown, though at a less rapid pace. Both the White and African American populations have declined over this time period. • San Buenaventura has a majority White non-Hispanic population (53.7%), with smaller Hispanic (36.9%) and AAPI (3.9%) populations than the County overall. Since 1990, the population of Hispanic residents has grown rapidly (more than doubled), as has the AAPI population.
• Simi Valley is majority White non-Hispanic (58.2%). Compared to the County overall, Simi valley has a smaller Hispanic population (24.5%), a comparable African American population (1.4%), and a higher AAPI population (11.9%). Population trends since 1990 mirror those of the County overall (declining White non-Hispanic population, growing Hispanic and AAPI population, steady African American population).
• Thousand Oaks’ population is two-thirds White non-Hispanic (67.7%). The AAPI population comprises a higher share of the population than in the County overall 471
Ventura County Regional AI 5
(9.5%), while the Hispanic population is much lower (17.8%) and the African American population is comparable (1.4%). Since 1990, White non-Hispanic, Hispanic, AAPI, and Black populations have all grown in Thousand Oaks.
National Origin:
Ventura County has a foreign-born population of approximately 179,940 persons, which equals about 21.3% of the total population. The number of foreign-born residents has been growing steadily since 1990, as has the percentage of the total population that is foreignborn. The largest group of foreign-born residents are persons born in Mexico (102,405, or
12.1% of the total population), followed by the Philippines (12,646 persons, or 1.5% of the total population), and India (7,824 persons, or 0.9% of the total population).
Approximately 140,600 of the County’s foreign-born residents live in the five participating jurisdictions. In all, the number of foreign-born residents has increased since 1990. • Camarillo has approximately 9,935 foreign-born residents, comprising 14.5% of the total population. Mexico and Philippines are the two largest countries of origin. • Oxnard has approximately 70,346 foreign-born residents, which is equal to 33.9% of the total population. The city is home to 56,425 Mexican-born residents, who make up just over one-quarter (27.1%) of the city’s population. The city also has approximately 6,163 residents born in the Philippines (3% of the city’s population) and 1,436 residents born in El Salvador (0.7% of the city’s population). • San Buenaventura has approximately 15,568 foreign-born residents, which is equal to approximately 14.6% of the city’s population. Mexican-born residents are the largest group of foreign-born residents, with a population of approximately 8,229 (or
7.6% of the city’s population).
• Simi Valley has a foreign-born population of 22,650 (18% of the city’s population). The primary countries of origin for the city’s foreign-born residents are Mexico (approximately 5,017 city residents born there), India (3,236), and the Philippines (1,922).
• Thousand Oaks is home to approximately 22,101 foreign-born residents (equal to
17.3% of the city’s population). Thousand Oaks’ foreign-born residents were primarily born in Mexico (5,120 persons), China (excluding Taiwan; 2,089 persons), India (1,917 persons), and the Philippines (1,114 persons).
Limited English Proficiency:
Persons who have Limited English Proficiency (LEP) are those who primarily speak a language other than English and speak English “less than very well”. In Ventura County, there are 115,288 LEP persons, which is equal to approximately 13.6% of the total population. The number of LEP persons in the county has been increasing since 1990, when there were 78,398 LEP persons (11.7% of the total population at the time). The majority of LEP persons in the county speak Spanish: there are 105,811 Spanish-speaking LEP persons. Other major 472
Ventura County Regional AI 6
languages spoken by LEP persons include Tagalog, Chinese, Vietnamese, Korean, Persian (Farsi), and Arabic.
Approximately 89,350 of the county’s LEP persons live in the five participating jurisdictions.
In all, the number of LEP individuals has increased since 1990. • Camarillo has approximately 3,653 LEP residents, comprising 5.3% of the total population. Spanish is the most commonly used language among LEP residents. • Oxnard has approximately 57,900 LEP residents, which is equal to 27.9% of the total population. The city is home to 54,412 Spanish-speaking LEP residents, who make up just over one-quarter (26.2%) of the city’s population. The city also has approximately 3,150 LEP residents who speak Tagalog (1.5% of the city’s population). • San Buenaventura has approximately 8,234 LEP residents, which is equal to approximately 7.6% of the city’s population. Spanish is the most commonly used language among LEP residents.
• Simi Valley has an LEP population of 10,587 (8.4% of the city’s population). The most common language spoken by the city’s LEP residents is Spanish: approximately 6,831 LEP residents speak Spanish (5.4% of the city’s population). • Thousand Oaks is home to approximately 8,976 LEP residents (equal to 7% of the city’s population). The main languages spoken by Thousand Oaks’ LEP residents are Spanish (6,556 persons, or 5.1% of the city’s population) and Chinese (1,554 persons, or 1.2% of the city’s population).
Age:
Ventura County’s population is aging. In 1990, approximately 9.3% of the county’s population was age 65 years and older. Currently, approximately 15.6% of the population is 65 years or older. Over the same period, the percentage of the county’s population that was younger than 18 years dropped from 27.3% to 22.9%.
Of the participating jurisdictions, Oxnard has the youngest population: 26.7% of the city’s population is under age 18 and 10% is 65 years and older. Thousand Oaks and Camarillo have the highest concentration of residents ages 65 years and older: nearly one-fifth of the population in each city is 65 years or older.
Families with Children:
Ventura County has approximately 80,943 families with children, which equals approximately 41.2% of all families in the county.
Of the participating jurisdictions, Oxnard has the highest percentage of families with children (46.22%) and Thousand Oaks has the lowest (37.6%). 473
Ventura County Regional AI 7
Table 1 - Demographics
474
Ventura County Regional AI 8
Table 2 – Demographic Trends
475
Ventura County Regional AI 9
Describe housing patterns, including tenure, cost burden, and the location of renters and owners.
The table below, titled “Housing Trends”, shows data on housing tenure and cost burden for Ventura County and the participating jurisdictions. These data are from the 2011-2015 and 2016-2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. This table shows the following:
Tenure:
In Ventura County, approximately 63.3% of households own their home and 36.7% rent.
Between 2015 and 2020, the number of owner-occupied households declined very slightly and the number of renter households increased.
• Oxnard and San Buenaventura have higher concentrations of renter households than the County overall. In Oxnard, 54.5% of households own their home and 45.6% rent.
In San Buenaventura, 55.5% own and 44.5% rent.
• Camarillo, Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks have higher concentrations of homeowner households than the County overall. In Camarillo, 69.9% of households own their own and 30.1% rent. In Simi Valley, 71.5% of households own their home and 28.5% rent. In Thousand Oaks, 69.4% own and 30.6% rent.
Cost Burden:
In Ventura County, over half (55.6%) of all renter households are cost burdened (meaning they pay more than 30% of their income towards housing costs—rent, utilities, etc.) and approximately 31.5% of homeowner households are cost-burdened. Between 2015 and 2020, the number of cost-burdened renter households in the county increased. • In Oxnard, the number of cost-burdened renters and homeowners declined between 2015 and 2020, even while the overall numbers of renter and homeowner households remained constant.
476
Ventura County Regional AI 10
Table – Housing Trends
Location of Renters and Owners:
Map 16 – Housing Tenure shows the distribution of renter households in Ventura County, including in the participating jurisdictions. The darker shaded areas have a higher proportion of renter households. This map shows concentrations of renter households in San Buenaventura and Oxnard, including in one Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Area of Poverty (R/ECAP) in Oxnard, discussed more below. There are also smaller concentrations of renters in the following areas:
• In the central areas of Camarillo and Thousand Oaks;
• In the city of Moorpark;
• In the city of Santa Paula, in a Census tract that also qualifies as a R/ECAP; and • At military bases (south of Oxnard) and at California State University Channel Islands (west of Thousand Oaks).
The map also shows concentrations of homeowners (represented by the lightly shaded areas) in the southern and eastern parts of the county, in and around Thousand Oaks, Simi Valley, and Camarillo. There are also concentrations of homeowner housing in north San Buenaventura and one Census tract in north Oxnard. 477
Ventura County Regional AI 11
Map 16 – Housing Tenure
Describe the demographics of residents of publicly supported housing.
Table 6 – Publicly Supported Households by Race/Ethnicity shows the demographics of residents of different types of publicly supported housing programs, including Public Housing, Project-Based Section 8, Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program, and Other Multifamily programs. This table shows that, in Ventura County • The majority of publicly supported housing is provided through the HCV Program.
Approximately 53.3% of voucher recipients are Hispanic, and 37.4% are White. • The next largest housing program is Public Housing. The majority of Public Housing residents are Hispanic (69%) and approximately 25% are White. • Project-Based Section 8 properties are 36.8% White, 34.3% Hispanic, and 26% AAPI.
The demographics of households in publicly supported housing vary widely between the participating jurisdictions:
• In Oxnard, the vast majority of households in all housing programs are Hispanic. • In Simi Valley, Thousand Oaks, and San Buenaventura, the majority of HCV households are White (and in Camarillo, just under half are White). • In Camarillo and San Buenaventura, the majority of Project-Based Section 8 households are White, and the majority of Public Housing residents are Hispanic. • In Thousand Oaks, almost half of the Project-Based Section 8 households are AAPI.
478
Ventura County Regional AI 12
Table 6 – Publicly Supported Households by Race/Ethnicity 479
Ventura County Regional AI 13
B. Segregation/Integration
Describe segregation levels and identify the racial/ethnic groups that experience the highest levels of segregation.
Table 3 – Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends shows how segregated or integrated various racial/ethnic groups are in Ventura County and the participating jurisdictions using a Dissimilarity Index, which is calculated using data from the 2010 Decennial Census. The Dissimilarity Index measures the degree to which two groups are evenly distributed across a geographic area and is commonly used for assessing residential segregation between two groups. Dissimilarity index values indicate the following:
• Values between 0 and 39 generally indicate high integration (low segregation) • Values between 40 and 54 generally indicate moderate segregation • Values between 55 and 100 generally indicate a high level of segregation Table 3 shows that Ventura County, as of these 2010 data, has moderate segregation between White and Hispanic residents, and low segregation (high integration) between Black and White residents and between AAPI and White residents.
Within the participating jurisdictions, segregation levels are lower than in county overall, and are mostly low except in Oxnard, where there is moderate segregation between White and Hispanic residents.
While cities have generally lower segregation levels, the County has higher segregation levels. This suggests that segregation is more likely to occur at the City level (versus the neighborhood level). Evidence of this can be found in the demographic data described above, which shows that while the county’s total population is majority non-White, the populations of the participating cities are majority White, non-Hispanic, with the exception of Oxnard, which is 75% Hispanic.
Table 3 – Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends
480
Ventura County Regional AI 14
Identify areas with relatively high segregation and integration by race/ethnicity, national origin, or LEP group, and indicate the predominant groups living in each area.
Race/Ethnicity:
Map 1 – Race/Ethnicity shows the distribution of various racial/ethnic groups in Ventura County—each dot represents 75 people, and the various racial/ethnic groups are represented by different colored dots.
Map 1 shows that there are concentrations of Hispanic residents in Oxnard, as well as in Santa Paula, as indicated by the number of blue dots in these areas. Areas in the rest of the county, including the other participating jurisdictions, are well integrated, as indicated by the mixture of different colored dots.
Map 1 – Race/Ethnicity
National Origin:
Map 3 – National Origin shows the distribution of foreign-born residents in Ventura County.
Each dot represents 75 people, and the different colored dots represent different countries of birth, for the 5 most populous groups of foreign-born residents.
Map 3 shows that there are Mexican-born individuals residing throughout the county, with a high concentration in Oxnard, and particularly in South Oxnard. Additionally, the Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs) in Oxnard, Santa Paula, and Fillmore (discussed more below) have concentrations of Mexican-born individuals. 481
Ventura County Regional AI 15
Map 3 – National Origin
Limited English Proficiency:
According to the 2016-2020 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year Estimates, shown in the table below, titled “Language Spoken at Home”, approximately 38% of Ventura County residents over the age of 5 speak a language other than English at home, including 14.5% that speak English less than “very well”. Of those who speak English less than “very well”, the largest group speaks Spanish: 11.8% of the population speaks Spanish at home and has Limited English Proficiency (LEP). Of the participating jurisdictions, Oxnard has the highest concentration of LEP individuals—29.9% of Oxnard’s population has Limited English Proficiency, the majority of whom speak Spanish.
482
Ventura County Regional AI 16
Table – Language Spoken at Home
Map 4 - LEP shows the distribution of LEP residents in Ventura County. Each dot represents 75 people. The different colored dots represent languages spoken by individuals who speak English “less than very well,” for the five most common languages spoken by residents with Limited English Proficiency.
Map 4 shows that there are Spanish-speaking LEP individuals residing throughout the County, with a high concentration in Oxnard, and particularly in South Oxnard. Additionally, the R/ECAPS in Oxnard, Santa Paula, and Fillmore have concentrations of Spanish-speaking LEP individuals.
483
Ventura County Regional AI 17
Map 4 – LEP
Explain how these segregation levels and patterns have changed over time (since 1990).
Table 3 (above) shows Dissimilarity Index values for different points in time, going back to 1990. The table shows that, over this time period, segregation levels have remained relatively stable in Ventura County, with the exception of Black/White segregation, which has decreased significantly. In Camarillo and Thousand Oaks, AAPI/White segregation has increased over this period, though it remains low.
Map 2 – Race/Ethnicity Trends shows the distribution of various racial/ethnic groups in Ventura County at three different points: 1990, 2000, and 2010. As with Map 1, each dot represents 75 people, and the various racial/ethnic groups are represented by different colored dots.
Map 2 shows that residential patterns have not shifted much since 1990, though the number of Hispanic residents has increased, most notably in Oxnard. 484
Ventura County Regional AI 18
Map 2 – Race/Ethnicity Trends 1990
Map 2 – Race/Ethnicity Trends 2000
485
Ventura County Regional AI 19
Map 2 – Race/Ethnicity Trends 2010
Compare the locations of publicly supported housing with the areas of concentration.
Map 5 - Publicly Supported Housing and Race/Ethnicity shows the location of publicsupported housing throughout Ventura County, as well as the distribution of various racial/ethnic groups—each dot represents 75 people, and the various racial/ethnic groups are represented by different colored dots.
Map 5 shows that the areas with concentrations of Hispanic residents (Oxnard and Santa Paula), also have a high number of publicly supported housing. In Santa Paula, these are primarily Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. In Oxnard, it is a mix of different types of publicly supported housing.
486
Ventura County Regional AI 20
Map 5 - Publicly Supported Housing and Race/Ethnicity
Describe how the demographics of publicly supported housing compare to the demographics of areas where the housing is located.
Table 6 - Publicly Supported Households by Race/Ethnicity shows the racial/ethnic composition of different types of publicly supported housing, as well as the overall racial/ethnic composition by income category in Ventura County and each of the participating jurisdictions. The table shows the following:
• The share of Black and Hispanic households in the HCV Program is higher than the share of Black and Hispanic households in the county overall, as well as the share of income-eligible Black households in the county. This is also the case in most of the participating jurisdictions, except for Simi Valley, where the share of Hispanic households in the HCV Program is approximately the same as the share of incomeeligible Hispanic households in the city overall. • The share of Black and Hispanic households in Public Housing is higher than the share of Black and Hispanic households in the county overall, as well as the share of income-eligible Black households in the county. This is also the case in most of the participating jurisdictions, except for Oxnard and Thousand Oaks, where the share of Black households in Public Housing is lower than the Black population overall, and in Simi Valley, where there are no Public Housing units.
487
Ventura County Regional AI 21
• The share of AAPI households in Project-Based Section 8 units is higher than the share of AAPI households in the county overall, as well as the share of income-eligible AAPI households in the county. This is also the case in all participating jurisdictions. 488
Ventura County Regional AI 22
Table 6 - Publicly Supported Households by Race/Ethnicity 489
Ventura County Regional AI 23
Describe the public or private policies or practices, demographic shifts, economic trends, or other factors that may have caused or contributed to the patterns described above (including siting decisions of private or publicly supported housing or the location of residents using Housing Choice Vouchers).
In the 2021-2029 Housing Elements prepared and adopted by each jurisdiction, the following factors were identified that contribute to the patterns described above.
In unincorporated Ventura County,
• Past racially restrictive covenants and school district gerrymandering caused segregation in schools and neighborhoods that still exists today. • The cost of housing impacts where people can live. For example, rural and agricultural communities along Highway 126 have more affordable housing opportunities overall, and these communities are primarily home to Hispanic/Latino, low- and moderate-income households, including farmworkers. • Infrastructure constraints restrict development of high-density housing in most of the unincorporated county, where higher-density housing is most needed. • Lack of community support for high-density affordable housing. • Limited housing opportunities for persons with disabilities.
In Oxnard, low-income households are concentrated due to, • Market forces, and particularly the desirability of coastline neighborhoods, which are therefore more costly than neighborhoods in the urban core. • Limited availability of rentals that accept Housing Choice Vouchers. • Limited availability of affordable units in a range of sizes.
In San Buenaventura,
• The location and type of affordable housing.
• Concentrations of HCV use.
• Unemployment and disinvestment after oil industry left. • Lack of private investment.
• Lack of public investments in specific neighborhoods, including services or amenities.
• A lack of knowledge of fair housing rights for tenants and responsibilities from landlords, due to the following:
o Lack of fair housing testing
o Lack of fair housing monitoring
o Lack of targeted outreach
o Lack of outreach meeting locations within the City, especially in the Westside Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area (NRSA) and downtown and midtown communities.
490
Ventura County Regional AI 24
In Simi Valley,
• Insufficient and inaccessible fair housing outreach and enforcement. • Lack of accessible fair housing information.
• Lack of marketing fair housing events such as fair housing conferences, resource meetings, and community meetings.
In Thousand Oaks,
• The location and type of affordable housing.
• Concentrations of HCV use.
• Lack of private investment.
• Lack of public investments in specific neighborhoods, including services or amenities.
C. Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs)
Identify any R/ECAPs or groupings of R/ECAP tracts.
HUD defines racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs) as Census tracts that meet both of the following criteria:
• a non-White population of 50 percent or more, and
• a poverty rate that exceeds 40% or a poverty rate that is three or more times the average tract poverty rate for the metropolitan area, whichever threshold is lower.
Map – R/ECAPs shows the distribution of R/ECAPs in Ventura County. The map shows R/ECAPs in the following areas:
• Central Oxnard
• Santa Paula
• Fillmore
491
Ventura County Regional AI 25
Map - R/ECAPs
Describe and identify the predominant protected classes residing in R/ECAPs, and how these demographics compare with the overall demographics of the area.
Table 4 - R/ECAP Demographics shows the demographics of R/ECAPs, including information on race/ethnicity, family type, and national origin. Since the only R/ECAPs are in Oxnard and areas of Ventura County outside the participating jurisdictions, the table only shows data for these two jurisdictions.
Comparing Table 4 to Table 1 (above) shows that Hispanic individuals, Mexican-born individuals, and families with children are all overrepresented in R/ECAPs when compared to the overall demographics of Ventura County and Oxnard:
• Hispanic individuals comprise 42.8% of Ventura County’s population (see Table 1, above) and 88.5% of the R/ECAP population. In Oxnard, the overall population is
75.1% Hispanic and the R/ECAP is 97.1% Hispanic.
• Mexican-born individuals comprise 12.1% of Ventura County’s population and 37.7% of the R/ECAP population. In Oxnard, 27.2% of the overall population was born in Mexico and 49.9% of the R/ECAP population was born in Mexico. 492
Ventura County Regional AI 26
• Families with children comprise 41.2% of all families in Ventura County, and 59.9% of all families in the R/ECAP areas. In Oxnard, 46.2% of all families in the city have children while 62.1% of families in the R/ECAP have children.
Table 4 - RECAP Demographics
Describe how R/ECAPs have changed over time (since 1990).
Map – R/ECAP Trends shows the distribution of R/ECAPs in Ventura County in 1990, 2000, and 2010. This map shows that:
• The current R/ECAP in central Oxnard has been designated a R/ECAP since at least 1990.
• In prior years there were additional areas in Oxnard, as well as an area in the northwest part of San Buenaventura, that were designated as R/ECAPs; these areas no longer qualify as R/ECAPs.
• The areas of Santa Paula and Fillmore that are currently designated as R/ECAPs were not designated as R/ECAPs prior to 2010.
493
Ventura County Regional AI 27
Map – R/ECAP Trends 1990
Map – R/ECAP Trends 2000
494
Ventura County Regional AI 28
Map – R/ECAP Trends 2010
Describe how R/ECAPs align with the location of publicly supported housing.
Map 5 - Publicly Supported Housing and Race/Ethnicity (shown above) shows the location of public-supported housing throughout Ventura County, as well as the location of R/ECAPs.
This map shows that:
• There are various LIHTC properties located in the R/ECAP in Santa Paula. • There is a concentration of public housing and LIHTC properties in and around the R/ECAP in Oxnard (while the R/ECAP is not visible on Map 5, it can be seen on Map – R/ECAPs, also shown above).
Compare the demographic composition of occupants of publicly supported housing in R/ECAPS to the demographic composition of occupants of publicly supported housing outside of R/ECAPs.
Table 7 - R/ECAP and Non-R/ECAP Demographics by Publicly Supported Housing Program Category (below) shows the demographics of publicly-supported housing located in and outside of R/ECAPs in Ventura County. The HUD-provided data does not include demographics for LIHTC properties, so the relevant demographic data in this table is for households with Housing Choice Vouchers (HCVs) residing in R/ECAPs. This table shows that Hispanic households that participate in the HCV Program are much more likely to reside in R/ECAPs: in R/ECAPs, 75.2% of households with HCVs are Hispanic, while outside R/ECAPs only 51.1% of households with HCVs are Hispanic. 495
Ventura County Regional AI 29
Table 7 - RECAP Demographics by Publicly Supported Housing Program Describe the public or private policies or practices, demographic shifts, economic trends, or other factors that may have caused or contributed to the patterns described above.
In their respective 2021-2029 Housing Elements, Ventura County and Oxnard identified the following factors that have contributed to the patterns described above.
In unincorporated Ventura County,
• Past racially restrictive covenants and school district gerrymandering caused segregation in schools and neighborhoods that still exists today. • The cost of housing impacts where people can live. For example, rural and agricultural communities along Highway 126 have more affordable housing opportunities overall, and these communities are primarily home to Hispanic/Latino, low- and moderate-income households, including farmworkers. • Infrastructure constraints restrict development of high-density housing in most of the unincorporated county, where higher-density housing is most needed. • Lack of community support for high-density affordable housing.
In Oxnard,
• The limited availability and location of rentals that accept Housing Choice Vouchers. • Linguistic isolation of non-English speaking households. • Limited economic mobility opportunities.
496
Ventura County Regional AI 30
D. Disparities in Access to Opportunity
1. Education
Describe any disparities in access to proficient schools based on race/ethnicity, national origin, and family status.
Table 12 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity, below, includes a School Proficiency Index, which measures the proximity various racial/ethnic groups have, based on where they live, to neighborhoods with high-performing schools. School proficiency is measured using school-level data on the performance of 4th grade students on state exams. The index is based on a range of 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better proximity to high-performing schools.
Table 12 shows that, in Ventura County:
• White, non-Hispanic residents have the most access to neighborhoods with highperforming schools, and Hispanic and Black residents have the least access. • Across racial and ethnic categories, residents living below the federal poverty line have less access to neighborhoods with high-performing schools. • For residents below the poverty line, the pattern of disparities between racial/ethnic groups is the generally the same as for the overall population, with the exception that Native American residents living below the federal poverty line have the least access to neighborhoods with high-performing schools of any group.
These County-level disparities are, in part, due to disparities in access across the participating jurisdictions:
• In Oxnard, which has the highest concentration of Hispanic residents of all the participating jurisdictions, all residents, regardless of race/ethnicity or poverty status, have low access to neighborhoods with high-performing schools. • Conversely, in the other participating jurisdictions, residents of all races/ethnicities have relatively high access to neighborhoods with high-performing schools, with residents of Thousand Oaks having the best access.
497
Ventura County Regional AI 31
Table 12 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity
498
Ventura County Regional AI 32
Describe the relationship between the residency patterns of racial/ethnic, national origin, and family status groups and their proximity to proficient schools.
Map 7 – Demographics and School Proficiency is a series of three maps showing the School Proficiency Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. The maps are shaded according to school proximity index values. The darker shaded areas are those with higher index values, indicating the presence of higher performing schools in those areas. On these maps, residents of different racial/ethnic groups and different countries of origin are represented by different colored dots, and the size of the circles represents the percentage of households in the area that are families with children.
The maps show clear differences in school performance based on geography. Specifically, areas in and around Oxnard, Santa Paula, and Fillmore have the least access to high performing schools. These are also areas with high concentrations of Hispanic residents, foreign-born residents of Mexican origin, and families with children. 499
Ventura County Regional AI 33
Map 7 – Race/Ethnicity and School Proficiency
Map 7 – National Origin and School Proficiency
500
Ventura County Regional AI 34
Map 7 – Family Status and School Proficiency
2. Employment
Describe any disparities in access to jobs and labor markets by protected class groups.
Table 12 includes a Jobs Proximity Index, which measures the physical distance between where residents of different races/ethnicities live and the location of jobs. A higher index value indicates better access to employment opportunities.
In Ventura County, there are generally no large disparities across races/ethnicities in access to neighborhoods near employment centers; index values are between 46-52 for all groups except for Native Americans living below the poverty line, who have significantly less access to neighborhoods near employment centers.
Between the participating jurisdictions there are large disparities in the Jobs Proximity Index:
• Simi Valley has the lowest index values, followed by Oxnard. This indicates that residents in these two cities generally have less access to employment centers than residents in other parts of the county.
• Camarillo and Thousand Oaks have the highest index values, indicating residents in these cities have better access to employment centers than residents in other parts of the county. In Camarillo, Black and AAPI residents living below the poverty line have 501
Ventura County Regional AI 35
less access than other groups, but still have higher access compared to the county population overall.
• San Buenaventura residents have better access to employment centers than the county population overall. Black and AAPI residents living below the poverty line have the best access to employment centers of any group in the city.
Table 12 also includes a Labor Market Index, which measures the unemployment rate, laborforce participation rate, and percent of the population ages 25 and above with at least a bachelor’s degree, by neighborhood. A higher index value indicates that residents live in a neighborhood with higher labor force participation and human capital.
In Ventura County, there are disparities across racial/ethnic groups in the Labor Market Index:
• White non-Hispanic and AAPI residents are most likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital.
• Black and Native American residents are less likely than White non-Hispanic and AAPI residents to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital.
• Hispanic residents are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital.
• Across all racial/ethnic groups, residents living below the poverty line are less likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital.
Hispanic and Native American residents living below the poverty line have the lowest Labor Market Index values of all groups in the county.
The table also shows that access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital varies across the participating jurisdictions, as well as between racial/ethnic groups within the participating jurisdictions:
• Camarillo and Thousand Oaks both have higher Labor Market Index values than the county across all racial/ethnic groups. In Camarillo, residents have fairly equal access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital regardless of race/ethnicity, with the exception of Black residents below the poverty line who have less access than other groups. Residents of Thousand Oaks experience some disparity in access, with Hispanic residents being less likely than others to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital. • Oxnard has lower Labor Market Index values than the county for all groups and there are disparities in access between racial/ethnic groups: White non-Hispanic residents have the best access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital, and Hispanic, AAPI, and Native American residents living below the poverty line have the least access.
• Simi Valley and San Buenaventura residents generally have better access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital than residents of the county overall, though Labor Market Index values in these cities are lower than 502
Ventura County Regional AI 36
in Thousand Oaks and Camarillo. Simi Valley residents do not experience much disparity in access based on race/ethnicity. In San Buenaventura, Black and Hispanic residents have less access than other racial/ethnic groups overall, and Black residents below the poverty line have least access of any group.
Describe how a person’s place of residence affects their ability to obtain a job.
Map 8 –Demographics and Job Proximity is a series of three maps showing the Jobs Proximity Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index scores, which means they are closer to areas of employment. The maps show areas with low job proximity index values in south Oxnard, central and eastern parts of Simi Valley, and near Santa Paula. Additionally, the maps show concentrations of Hispanic residents and Foreign-born residents of Mexican origin living in South Oxnard neighborhoods with low access to employment centers.
Map 8 – Race/Ethnicity and Job Proximity
503
Ventura County Regional AI 37
Map 8 – National Origin and Job Proximity
504
Ventura County Regional AI 38
Map 8 – Family Status and Job Proximity
Map 9 – Demographics and Labor Market is a series of three maps showing the Labor Market Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index scores, which means they have higher labor force participation and human capital. The maps show areas with low labor market index values in central and south Oxnard, Santa Paula, Fillmore, and the unincorporated areas east of Fillmore. These areas, and particularly central and south Oxnard and Santa Paula (including the R/ECAPs), also have concentrations of Hispanic residents, Foreign-born residents of Mexican origin, and families with children. 505
Ventura County Regional AI 39
Map 9 – Race/Ethnicity and Labor Market
506
Ventura County Regional AI 40
Map 9 – National Origin and Labor Market
Map 9 – Family Status and Labor Market
507
Ventura County Regional AI 41
Describe which racial/ethnic, national origin, or family status groups are least successful in accessing employment.
The table below, titled “Labor Force Participation and Unemployment”, shows 2016-2020 ACS data on labor force participation rates and unemployment rates for the overall population and by race/ethnicity, disability status, and sex, in Ventura County and in the participating jurisdictions. The table shows that, in Ventura County:
• White, non-Hispanic, and AAPI individuals have the lowest unemployment rates, followed by Hispanic individuals. Black residents have the highest unemployment rate, and it is more than double the White, non-Hispanic unemployment rate. • Individuals with disabilities have much lower labor force participation rates, and much higher unemployment rates than the population overall.
The table also shows that unemployment rates vary between the participating jurisdictions:
• Camarillo and Thousand Oaks have lowest overall unemployment rates, and Oxnard has the highest.
• The unemployment rates for Black residents are the highest in all jurisdictions, except in Camarillo and Thousand Oaks, where unemployment rates for Native American residents are even higher.
• In Thousand Oaks, unlike the other jurisdictions, the unemployment rate for persons with disabilities is nearly the same as the overall unemployment rate.
Table – Labor Force Participation and Unemployment
508
Ventura County Regional AI 42
3. Transportation
Describe any disparities in access to transportation related to costs and access to public transit by protected class groups.
Table 12 includes a Transit Index, which measures the likelihood that residents utilize public transportation. Higher index values indicate better access to public transit in a neighborhood. The table shows that there are relatively high index values countywide, with little disparity among racial/ethnic groups or for groups living below the poverty line. This indicates relatively equal access to public transit across the county for different racial/ethnic groups.
Among the participating jurisdictions, Oxnard has the highest index values, indicating that residents in the city have better access to public transit than residents in other parts of the county. Camarillo index values are also slightly higher than values for the county.
Table 12 also includes a Low Transportation Cost Index, which measures the cost of transportation in a neighborhood. Higher index values indicate lower transportation costs.
Transportation costs may be low in a neighborhood due to better access to public transportation, or to the density of housing, services, and employment, or to other reasons.
The table 12 shows that there are relatively high index values countywide, with little disparity among racial/ethnic groups or for groups living below the poverty line. This indicates relatively equal access to neighborhoods with low transportation costs across the county for different racial/ethnic groups.
Describe how a person’s place of residence affects their access to transportation.
Map 10 – Demographics and Transit Trips is a series of three maps showing the Transit Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with better access to public transit. The maps show relatively high index values across the county. Areas with the best access to public transit are found in Oxnard, which is also where there are high concentrations of Hispanic individuals, foreign-born residents of Mexican origin, and families with children.
509
Ventura County Regional AI 43
Map 10 – Race/Ethnicity and Transit Trips
Map 10 – National Origin and Transit Trips
510
Ventura County Regional AI 44
Map 10 – Family Status and Transit Trips
511
Ventura County Regional AI 45
Map 11 – Demographics and Low Transportation Cost is a series of three maps showing the Low Transportation Cost Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with lower transportation costs. The maps show relatively high access across the county to neighborhoods with low transportation costs.
Map 11 – Race/Ethnicity and Low Transportation Cost
512
Ventura County Regional AI 46
Map 11 – National Origin and Low Transportation Cost
Map 11 – Family Status and Low Transportation Cost
513
Ventura County Regional AI 47
4. Access to Low Poverty Neighborhoods
Describe any disparities in exposure to poverty by protected class groups.
Table 12 includes a Low Poverty Index, which measures the level of poverty in a neighborhood. Higher index values indicate less exposure to poverty in a neighborhood. The table shows that, in Ventura County:
• White, non-Hispanic, residents have the highest index values, followed by AAPI residents, indicating these groups are least likely to live in high poverty neighborhoods.
• Hispanic residents have the lowest index values, meaning they are more likely than other groups to live in high poverty neighborhoods.
• Black and Native American are more likely than White and AAPI residents to be exposed to poverty, but less likely than Hispanic residents. • Residents living below the poverty line are more likely to live in high poverty areas across all racial/ethnic groups; and there is the same pattern of disparity between racial/ethnic groups as described above. Native American and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line are most likely to live in areas of poverty.
The table also shows that exposure to poverty varies between and within the participating jurisdictions:
• Oxnard has lower index values than the county overall, indicating that residents in the city are more likely to live in high poverty areas than residents in other parts of the county. In Oxnard, the pattern and scale of disparity between racial/ethnic groups is similar to that in the county overall.
• Simi Valley, Camarillo, and Thousand Oaks have higher index values than county overall, indicating that residents in these cities have better access to low poverty areas than residents in other parts of the county. Simi Valley and Camarillo have little disparity in access across racial/ethnic groups. In Thousand Oaks, disparities in access to low poverty areas between racial/ethnic groups are similar to the county overall, with the exception of Black residents living below the poverty line, who have the highest index values of any group, meaning they are most likely to live in low poverty areas.
• San Buenaventura has index values and patterns of disparity between racial/ethnic groups that are broadly similar to the county overall, though the scale of the disparities is smaller.
Describe the role a person’s place of residence plays in their exposure to poverty.
Map 12 – Demographics and Poverty is a series of three maps showing the Low Poverty Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas 514
Ventura County Regional AI 48
with less exposure to poverty. The maps show that, in Ventura County, the areas with the lowest index values, meaning the highest exposure to poverty are: the R/ECAP tracts in Santa Paula and Fillmore; central Oxnard, including the R/ECAP tract; east Oxnard; and the area north of San Buenaventura. Additionally, Central Oxnard and the R/ECAP tract in Santa Paula also have high concentrations of Hispanic residents, foreign-born residents of Mexican origin, and families with children.
Map 12 – Race/Ethnicity and Poverty
515
Ventura County Regional AI 49
Map 12 – National Origin and Poverty
Map 12 – Family Status and Poverty
516
Ventura County Regional AI 50
Describe which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups are most affected by poverty.
According to the above analysis of the data in Table 12 and Map 12, Hispanic residents overall are more likely than other racial/ethnic groups in the county to live in areas of poverty.
Native American and Hispanic residents living below the federal poverty line are the most likely of any racial/ethnic group to live in areas of poverty. As mentioned above, Central Oxnard and the R/ECAP in Santa Paula, which have high levels of poverty, also have high concentrations of Hispanic residents, foreign-born residents of Mexican origin, and families with children.
The table below, titled “Poverty by Race/Ethnicity and National Origin”, shows data from the 2016-2020 ACS on poverty rates by race/ethnicity and national origin. The table shows that, countywide, Native Americans have highest poverty rate (22.7%), followed by Hispanic and Black residents (12% and 10.2% respectively). White and AAPI residents have the lowest poverty rates (6.7% and 6% respectively). Additionally, foreign born residents are more likely to live in poverty than native born residents: 10.3% of foreign-born residents live below the poverty line compared to 8.6% of native-born residents. 517
Ventura County Regional AI 51
Table – Poverty by Race/Ethnicity and National Origin
518
Ventura County Regional AI 52
5. Access to Environmentally Healthy Neighborhoods
Describe any disparities in access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods by protected class groups.
Table 12 includes an Environmental Health Index, which captures the potential exposure to harmful toxins in a neighborhood. Higher index values indicate less exposure to harmful toxins, and therefore better environmental quality, in a neighborhood. The table shows that index values for residents in Ventura County are relatively low overall. This indicates that all residents, regardless of race/ethnicity, have poor access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods. There are small disparities among race/ethnic groups. For instance, Hispanic and Black residents have the lowest index scores; and White, non-Hispanic, residents have the highest index scores.
Describe how a person’s place of residence affects their access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods.
519
Ventura County Regional AI 53
Table 12 shows there are disparities between the participating jurisdictions in terms of ability of residents to access environmentally healthy neighborhoods:
• Camarillo has the lowest Environmental Health Index scores, indicating residents of this city have less access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods than do residents in other parts of the county. Camarillo residents living below the poverty line tend to have even less access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods than the overall population.
• Oxnard also has lower index scores across all racial/ethnic groups when compared to the county overall. Within the city, White, non-Hispanic, residents have slightly better access than other groups.
• Thousand Oaks has average index scores when compared to the County and other entitlement jurisdictions. The index score does not vary significantly between residents living above or below the poverty line indicating relatively uniform neighborhoods regarding environmental health within Thousand Oaks. • Simi Valley has the highest index scores, indicating residents of this city have the best access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods. Simi Valley residents across all racial/ethnic groups have similar access to environmentally friendly neighborhoods. • San Buenaventura also has higher index scores than the county as a whole, and residents across racial/ethnic groups have similar access to environmentally friendly neighborhoods. Residents below the poverty line have better access than the population as a whole for each racial/ethnic group.
Map 13 – Demographics and Environmental Health is a series of three maps showing the Environmental Health Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with less exposure to harmful toxins and therefore higher environmental quality. The maps show that the areas with best access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods are in:
• The eastern part of Simi Valley
• The western part of San Buenaventura
• Along the coast in the southern part of the county (to the southwest of Thousand Oaks)
• In the county to the north and northwest of San Buenaventura 520
Ventura County Regional AI 54
Map 13 – Race/Ethnicity and Environmental Health
Map 13 – National Origin and Environmental Health
521
Ventura County Regional AI 55
Map 13 – Family Status and Environmental Health
6. Disability and Access
Describe the barriers that deny individuals with disabilities access to opportunity and community assets.
Table 13 – Disability by Type, below, shows the percentage of residents with different kinds of disabilities living in Ventura County and in each participating jurisdiction. In both the County overall and each participating jurisdiction, the most prevalent form of disability is ambulatory difficulty: 5.5% of the County population lives with an ambulatory difficulty. The second-most common disability in the County is independent living difficulty: 4:43% of county residents have an independent living difficulty. This is also the second-most common disability in all participating jurisdictions except San Buenaventura, where cognitive difficulty is the second-most common disability after ambulatory difficulty.
Table 13 – Disability by Type
522
Ventura County Regional AI 56
The tables below, titled “Filed Discrimination Complaints, Ventura County 2020-2024”, summarize data on fair housing discrimination cases filed in Ventura County between 2020- 2024. These cases were either filed with HUD or the agency participating in HUD’s Fair Housing Assistance Program (FHAP). Over this period, there were a total of 69 cases filed, as shown in the first table. Most cases (66.7%) were due to discrimination that was, in part, based on the disability status of the person filing the complaint.
Filed Discrimination Complaints
Ventura County 2020-2024
Basis for Case
(Individual Cases)
Number of
Cases
Color, National Origin 1
Disability 33
Disability, Familial Status 2
Disability, Retaliation 7
Familial Status 4
National Origin 5
National Origin, Disability 1
National Origin, Sex, Disability 1
Race 2
Race, Color 1
523
Ventura County Regional AI 57
Race, Disability 1
Race, Disability, Retaliation 1
Race, National Origin 1
Race, Retaliation 2
Religion 1
Retaliation 1
Sex 3
Sex, Retaliation 2
Grand Total 69
Basis for Case
(Summary by
Protected Status)
Number of
Cases
Percent of
Cases
Color 2 2.9%
Disability 46 66.7%
Familial Status 6 8.7%
National Origin 9 13.0%
Race 8 11.6%
Religion 1 1.4%
Sex 6 8.7%
Source: HUD FHEO
These data were supported by information provided through the stakeholder consultations.
Accessibility was reported as a common complaint, and accessible housing was often identified as being substandard. One stakeholder organization stated that because not a lot of new affordable housing is being built in the county, the housing stock is aging and there is increased need for reasonable accommodations, which landlords don’t always respond to.
7. Publicly Supported Housing and Access
Describe the ways in which residents of publicly supported housing, by protected class group, experience disparities in access to opportunity.
As noted in the analysis above, central and south Oxnard, as well as Santa Paula, have high concentrations of publicly supported housing and are also areas with lower access to educational and employment opportunities. This is evident by their relatively low index scores on the School Proficiency Index, Job Proximity Index, and Labor Market Index. These areas also have high concentrations of poverty as demonstrated by their classification as R/ECAPs and their low scores on the Low Poverty Index.
524
Ventura County Regional AI 58
8. Patterns in Disparities in Access to Opportunity
Identify and discuss any overarching patterns of access to opportunity and exposure to adverse community factors. Include how these patterns compare to patterns of segregation, integration, and R/ECAPs. Also identify areas that experience: (a) high access; and (b) low access across multiple indicators.
As noted throughout the analysis above, in Ventura County:
• Hispanic residents are least likely to have access to neighborhoods with good schools and high labor force participation and human capital, and most likely to live in neighborhoods with high exposure to poverty and worse environmental health. • Black and Native American residents are also more likely to live in high poverty areas and have less access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital. Black residents of the county also have the highest unemployment rate of any group.
• Native Americans living below the poverty line have limited access to neighborhoods with high performing schools and proximity to employment centers.
Regarding the geographic distribution of opportunities:
• Residents in central and south Oxnard and in Santa Paula have less access to various opportunities than residents in other parts of the county, including residents in the other participating jurisdictions. This includes less access to neighborhoods that have good schools, are in proximity to employment centers, have high labor force participation rates and human capital, and have less concentrated poverty. These areas are also home to concentrations of Hispanic residents, foreign-born residents of Mexican origin, and families with children. Finally, these areas also overlap with two of the R/ECAPs in the county (in Oxnard and Santa Paula). • Conversely, residents in Thousand Oaks and Camarillo have the best access to neighborhoods with good schools, proximity to employment centers, high labor force participation and human capital, and less poverty.
Describe the public or private policies or practices, demographic shifts, economic trends, or other factors that may have caused or contributed to the patterns described above.
In the 2021-2029 Housing Elements prepared and adopted by each jurisdiction, the following factors were identified that contribute to the patterns described above:
In unincorporated Ventura County,
• Past racially restrictive covenants and school district gerrymandering caused segregation in schools and neighborhoods that still exists today. • Infrastructure constraints restrict development of high-density housing in most of the unincorporated county, where higher-density housing is most needed. 525
Ventura County Regional AI 59
In Camarillo,
• High cost of housing in rental and ownership markets and, specifically, limited affordability in High Opportunity Areas.
• Lack of vacant land for new development.
• High cost of land and construction, which disincentivizes developers from constructing affordable housing projects.
• Lack of public transportation, which is an impediment to those who cannot or do not drive a car.
• Lack of available accessible housing options for seniors and persons with disabilities.
In Oxnard,
• Limited availability of high-ranked schools throughout the city. • Shortage of public access to recreational facilities and parkland.
In San Buenaventura,
• Concentration of higher quality schools in eastside areas. • Lack of access to local jobs.
• Location near environmental pollutants (freeways).
• Lack of private investment.
• Lack of public investments in specific neighborhoods, including services or amenities.
In Simi Valley,
• Concentration of special needs groups.
• Location and type of affordable housing.
• Lack of private investment.
• Lack of sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, and other infrastructure.
In Thousand Oaks,
• Lack of access to local jobs.
• Location near environmental pollutants (freeways).
• Lack of private investment.
• Lack of public investments in specific neighborhoods, including services or amenities.
E. Disproportionate Housing Needs
Describe which groups (by race/ethnicity and familial status) experience higher rates of housing cost burden, overcrowding, or substandard housing when compared to other groups. Describe which groups also experience higher rates of severe housing cost burdens when compared to other groups.
526
Ventura County Regional AI 60
For the 2025 Regional Consolidated Plan (ConPlan), Ventura County analyzed 2016-2020 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data to determine if particular race/ethnic groups at various income levels disproportionately experience any of the following four housing problems:
• Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household lacks a sink with piped water, a range or stove, or a refrigerator.
• Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household lacks hot and cold piped water, a flush toilet, and a bathtub or shower.
• Overcrowding: A household is considered overcrowded if there are more than 1.01 people per room.
• Cost burden: A household is considered cost burdened if the household pays more than 30% of its total gross income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
A disproportionately greater need exists when members of a racial or ethnic group in a certain income range experience housing problems at a greater rate (10 percentage points or more) than the rate of housing problems experienced by all households within that income level. According to the charts below, which are included in the ConPlan analysis:
• Black/African American households have disproportionate housing needs in the 30- 50% AMI and 50-80% AMI ranges.
• Pacific Islander households have disproportionate housing needs in the 50-80% AMI range.
• American Indian and Alaska Native households have disproportionate housing needs in the 80-100% AMI range.
Disproportionate Need Across Households with Housing Problems 527
Ventura County Regional AI 61
528
Ventura County Regional AI 62
The ConPlan also analyzes the disproportionate impact of severe housing problems by race/ethnicity. Similar to housing problems, severe housing problems are defined as:
• Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household does not have a stove/oven and refrigerator.
• Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household does not have running water or modern toilets.
• Severe overcrowding: A household is considered severely overcrowded if there are more than 1.5 people per room.
• Severe cost burden: A household is considered severely cost burdened if the household pays more than 50% of its total income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
Within each income level, certain groups experience disproportionate need (defined above).
According to the charts below, which are included in the ConPlan analysis:
• Pacific Islander households have disproportionate severe housing needs in the 50- 80% and 80-100% AMI ranges.
• American Indian and Alaska Native households have disproportionate severe housing needs in the 80-100% AMI range.
529
Ventura County Regional AI 63
Disproportionate Need Across Households with Severe Housing Problems 530
Ventura County Regional AI 64
Identify which areas experience the greatest housing burdens. Describe which of these areas align with segregated areas, integrated areas, or R/ECAPs, and the predominant race/ethnicity or national origin groups in such areas.
Map 6 – Housing Problems is a series of maps showing concentrations of households experiencing one or more housing burdens and population distribution by race/ethnicity and national origin. On these maps, areas with darker shading have a higher percentage of households experiencing at least one housing burden. Housing burdens in this context are the following: cost burden, defined as paying more than 30% of income for monthly housing costs including utilities; overcrowding; lacking a complete kitchen; and lacking plumbing.
The maps show that the areas with highest percentages of households experiencing at least one housing burden are:
• Central and south Oxnard, including the R/ECAP tract
• Northeast Oxnard and areas just outside the city’s boundary • Santa Paula, including the R/ECAP tract
• Central and northwest San Buenaventura
These areas have high concentrations of Hispanic residents (in Oxnard and Santa Paula), and foreign-born residents of Mexican origin (in Oxnard, Santa Paula, and northwest San Buenaventura).
531
Ventura County Regional AI 65
Map 6 – Housing Problems and Race/Ethnicity
Map 6 – Housing Problems and National Origin
532
Ventura County Regional AI 66
Describe the differences in rates of renter and owner occupied housing by race/ethnicity.
The table below, titled “Homeownership and Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity”, shows the percentages of households that are renters and homeowners by race/ethnicity, based on data from the 2016-2020 American Community Survey. The table shows large disparities in homeownership rates between racial/ethnic groups in the county: AAPI households have the highest rate of homeownership (75%), followed by White, non-Hispanic households (70%).
Hispanic, Black, and Native American households have significantly lower homeownership rates (49%, 45%, and 42% respectively). This same pattern of racial/ethnic disparities holds within each participating jurisdiction, though the actual rates of homeownership vary. • Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks have the highest homeownership rates. • Oxnard and San Buenaventura have the lowest homeownership rates. • Camarillo has a homeownership rate that is comparable to the county overall.
Table - Homeownership and Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity Describe the public or private policies or practices, demographic shifts, economic trends, or other factors that may have caused or contributed to the patterns described above.
In the 2021-2029 Housing Elements prepared and adopted by each jurisdiction, the following factors were identified that contribute to the patterns described above. 533
Ventura County Regional AI 67
In unincorporated Ventura County,
• High cost of repairs or rehabilitation for older housing stock. • Lack of affordable housing.
• Lack of economic mobility for protected classes.
In Camarillo,
• High cost of housing in ownership market.
• The cost of home repairs and rehabilitation can be an obstacle for low- and moderateincome homeowners. • Deferred maintenance can result in severe housing problems for older housing units.
In Oxnard,
• Limited availability of affordable units in a range of sizes. • Unaffordable rents and home prices.
• Lack of partnerships with affordable housing developers. • High costs of repairs or rehabilitation.
In San Buenaventura,
• Age of housing stock.
• Limited availability of affordable units in a range of sizes. • The Thomas Fire, which destroyed multi-family housing and led to rent increases.
In Simi Valley,
• Substandard housing conditions.
• Age of housing stock.
• High cost of repairs and rehabilitation.
In Thousand Oaks,
• Increasing rental prices.
• Age of housing stock.
• The limited availability of affordable units in a range of sizes.
F. Local and State Policies and Practices Impacting Fair Housing Describe how local laws, policies, ordinances, and other practices impede or promote fair housing (including how they impede or promote the siting or location of affordable housing in well-resourced neighborhoods, and equitable access to homeownership and other asset building and economic opportunities).
As described above, each jurisdiction has identified various public and/or private policies and practices that have contributed to the fair housing issues identified in this AI. These include:
534
Ventura County Regional AI 68
• Past racially restrictive covenants and school district gerrymandering caused segregation in schools and neighborhoods that still exists today. • Infrastructure constraints that restrict development of high-density housing in parts of the county, as well as a lack of public investment in specific neighborhoods. • Insufficient public investment in fair housing education, outreach, and testing. • Lack of public transportation in some disadvantaged communities.
Regarding local laws, policies, ordinances, and other practices that promote fair housing, the State of California mandates that each jurisdiction in the state prepare a General Plan, a part of which is the Housing Element. The purpose of the Housing Element is to identify the community's housing needs; state the community's goals and objectives for housing production, rehabilitation, and conservation to meet those needs; and define the policies and programs that the community will implement to achieve the stated goals and objectives.
The Housing Element must be updated every 8 years and promotes fair housing in the following ways:
• In the Housing Element, jurisdictions must identify and address (by removing, if feasible) all governmental constraints to housing maintenance, improvement, and development.
• Housing Elements must also include an assessment of fair housing practices, examination of the relationship of available housing sites to areas of high opportunity, and actions to affirmatively further fair housing. The actions to affirmatively further fair housing that are included by jurisdictions in their Housing Element comprise a comprehensive set of local policies and practices that promote fair housing—these are listed in more detail in the Fair Housing Goals section, below.
Describe any state or local fair housing laws and the characteristics protected under each law.
In the State of California, the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and the Unruh Civil Rights Act prohibit discrimination in housing based on the following characteristics:
• Race
• Color
• National origin (including language use restrictions) • Religion
• Sex
• Familial status (including children under the age of 18 living with parents or legal custodians; pregnant women and people securing custody of children under 18) • Handicap (disability)
• Age
• Ancestry
• Citizenship
• Gender Identity and Gender Expression
• Genetic Information
535
Ventura County Regional AI 69
• Immigration Status
• Marital Status
• Primary Language
• Sexual Orientation
• Source of Income
• Military or veteran status
Describe efforts to increase fair housing compliance and enforcement capacity, and to ensure compliance with existing fair housing and civil rights laws and regulations.
The County of Ventura and all the participating jurisdictions contract with the Housing Rights Center of Los Angeles (HRC) a private, non-profit organization to assist each jurisdiction with fulfilling their fair housing obligations and to provide fair housing services. HRC’s mission is to actively support and promote fair housing through education, advocacy, dispute resolution and litigation to the end that all persons can secure the housing they desire and can afford, without regard to personal characteristics protected by law. Services offered through HRC include free landlord/tenant counseling, housing discrimination investigation, community outreach and education on fair housing laws. In addition, HRC enforces and performs investigations into housing discrimination by lenders and landlords throughout Ventura County.
The services provided by HRC are augmented by the State of California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH), which has the authority to investigate and prosecute violations of state civil rights laws on a state-wide basis, including the use of discriminatory language in housing advertisements. DFEH dual-files fair housing cases with HUD’s Region IX Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO), as part of the Fair Housing Assistance Program.
Describe the status of any unresolved findings, lawsuits, enforcement actions, settlements, or judgments in which the program participant has been a party related to fair housing or other civil rights laws in the jurisdiction.
Countywide, a total of 69 housing discrimination cases were opened between January 2020 and November 2024 (when this report was prepared). As shown in the table below, twentyone cases (30.4% of the total) were based on allegations made by persons residing in the County outside the participating cities. Among the participating cities, most cases originated in San Buenaventura (15 cases, or 21.7% of all filed cases), followed by Oxnard (11 cases, or
15.9% of all filed cases), Camarillo (8 cases, 11.6% of all filed cases), and Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks (7 cases each, 10.1% of all filed cases each).
Filed Discrimination Complaints by Jurisdiction,
Ventura County 2020-2024
Jurisdiction Cases Filed Percent of All
Cases Filed
536
Ventura County Regional AI 70
Camarillo 8 11.6%
Oxnard 11 15.9%
Simi Valley 7 10.1%
Thousand Oaks 7 10.1%
Ventura 15 21.7%
Other Jurisdictions 21 30.4%
Source: HUD FHEO
As discussed above, reports of discrimination based on disability comprised the majority of cases (66.7%), followed by national origin (13%), race (11.6%), familial status (8.7%), sex (8.7%), color (2.9%), and religion (1.4%). (Note that these percentages equal more than 100% when summed because some cases allege discrimination based on multiple protected class elements).
As shown in the table below, over half of the complaints (55.1%) were closed after it was determined by HUD that there was no reasonable cause to believe that discrimination occurred (“no cause determination”). Another 17.4% were successfully settled/conciliated and approximately 11.6% were either withdrawn by the complainant or closed due to the complainant failing to cooperate. As of November 1, 2024, 15.9% (11 cases) were still open.
Filed Discrimination Complaints by Closure Reason,
Ventura County 2020-2024
Case Closure Reason Number of
Cases
Percent of
All Cases
Complainant failed to cooperate 2 2.9%
Complaint withdrawn by complainant after resolution 3 4.3% Complaint withdrawn by complainant without resolution 3 4.3% Conciliation/settlement successful 12 17.4%
No cause determination 38 55.1%
Open cases as of 11/1/24 11 15.9%
Source: HUD, FHEO
IV. Fair Housing Issues and Goals
A. Fair Housing Issues
The following fair housing issues were identified in the analysis above.
Segregation
There is moderate segregation in the county between White and Hispanic residents, due to concentration of Hispanic residents in Oxnard and outside of the other participating cities (which are majority white). (Table 3 and Table 1). There are also concentrations of Hispanic 537
Ventura County Regional AI 71
residents in Oxnard and Santa Paula, and concentrations of foreign-born residents of Mexican origin and Spanish-speaking LEP residents in Oxnard, Santa Paula, and Fillmore R/ECAPs. Additionally, there are concentrations of publicly supported housing in Oxnard and Santa Paula (Map 5).
R/ECAPs
There are R/ECAPs in Oxnard, Santa Paula, and Fillmore. Hispanic households in the HCV program are more likely to reside in R/ECAPs than non-Hispanic HCV program participants.
Disparities in Access to Opportunities
Various protected class groups experience disparities in access to opportunities, including:
• Hispanic residents, who are least likely to have access to neighborhoods with good schools and high labor force participation and human capital, and most likely to live in neighborhoods with high exposure to poverty and worse environmental health. • Black and Native American residents, who are also more likely to live in high poverty areas and have less access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital. Black residents of the county also have the highest unemployment rate of any group.
• Native Americans living below the poverty line, who have limited access to neighborhoods with high performing schools and proximity to employment centers.
Geographically, residents in central/south Oxnard and Santa Paula have less access to various opportunities than residents in other parts of the county, including the other participating jurisdictions. This includes less access to neighborhoods with good schools, proximately to employment centers, high labor force participation rates and human capital, and less concentrated poverty. These areas are also home to concentrations of Hispanic residents, foreign-born residents of Mexican origin, and families with children. Finally, these areas also overlap with two of the R/ECAPs in the county (in Oxnard and Santa Paula).
Conversely, residents in Thousand Oaks and Camarillo have the most access to neighborhoods with good schools, proximity to employment centers, high labor force participation and human capital, and less poverty.
Disproportionate Housing Problems
Various protected class groups experience disproportionate housing problems, including • Black/African American households, who have disproportionate housing needs in the 30-50% AMI and 50-80% AMI ranges.
• Pacific Islander households, who have disproportionate housing needs in the 50-80% AMI range, and disproportionate severe housing needs in the 50-80% and 80-100% AMI ranges.
538
Ventura County Regional AI 72
• American Indian and Alaska Native households, who have disproportionate housing needs in the 80-100% AMI range and disproportionate severe housing needs in the 80-100% AMI range.
Geographically, the areas of the county with the highest percentages of households experiencing at least one housing burden are:
• Central and south Oxnard, including the R/ECAP tract
• Northeast Oxnard and areas just outside the city’s boundary • Santa Paula, including the R/ECAP tract
• Central and northwest San Buenaventura
These areas have high concentrations of Hispanic residents (in Oxnard and Santa Paula), and foreign-born residents of Mexican origin (in Oxnard, Santa Paula, and northwest San Buenaventura).
Disparities in Access to Homeownership
Hispanic, Black, and Native American households have significantly lower homeownership rates (49%, 45%, and 42% respectively) than AAPI and White, non-Hispanic, residents (75% and 70% respectively). Rates of homeownership vary across cities: Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks have the highest homeownership rates; and Oxnard and San Buenaventura have the lowest homeownership rates.
B. Fair Housing Goals
This section identifies the factors that create, contribute to, perpetuate, or increase the severity of the fair housing issues identified through the analysis above, and lists the goals and actions each jurisdiction will take to address those contributing factors in order to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing. The goals and actions listed below are included in each jurisdiction’s approved and adopted 2021-2029 Housing Element.
1. Ventura County
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Segregation and R/ECAPs Past racially restrictive covenants and school district gerrymandering caused segregation in schools and
neighborhoods.
Rural and agricultural communities (along Highway 126)
have more affordable housing opportunities overall. These communities are primarily home to Hispanic/Latino, lowand moderate-income households, including farmworkers.
539
Ventura County Regional AI 73
Infrastructure constraints restrict development of highdensity housing in most of the unincorporated county; therefore, county is limited in rezoning for higher density development in unincorporated communities which need
it most.
Lack of community support for high-density affordable
housing.
Limited housing opportunities for persons with
disabilities.
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
Encourage home share partnerships to provide affordable housing options in exchange for services to assist senior resident homeowners.
Continue the rent control program for mobile home parks, which provides housing for lower income residents in high resource areas.
Encourage construction of ADUs to increase supply of affordable housing, especially in high resource areas. Annually monitor the production of ADU’s to ensure that the County projection of 70 units per year is being achieved.
Increase services and amenities to improve access to opportunity in low resource areas.
Provide training to landlords on fair housing laws and encourage them to market their rental units in high resource areas to voucher holders.
Increased testing and more persistent enforcement of fair housing laws.
Actively recruit residents from low-opportunity/disadvantaged communities to serve or participate on boards, committees and other local government bodies.
Amend County Ordinances and implement new state housing laws that mandate the use of only objective standards to approve residential projects, including projects for the special needs population.
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Disparities in Access to
Opportunities
Past racially restrictive covenants and school district gerrymandering caused segregation in schools and
neighborhoods.
540
Ventura County Regional AI 74
Infrastructure constraints restrict development of highdensity housing in most of the unincorporated county; therefore, county is limited in rezoning for higher density development in unincorporated communities which need
it most.
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
Placement of New Residential Uses: Within designated disadvantaged communities, the County shall discourage the establishment of new residential and other sensitive land uses near incompatible industrial land uses unless appropriate mitigations or design consideration can be included.
County Investment Priorities: The County shall prioritize investment in infrastructure, services, safety net programs and other assets that are critical to future economic vitality, including public safety, healthcare, library services, water supply and quality, transportation, energy, and environmental resources. This investment shall consider equity in investment opportunities to designated disadvantaged communities, including designated Opportunity Zones under the federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The focus of these efforts shall be to improve social equity and opportunity for all.
Supporting Industries Fitting County Needs: The County shall strive to attract industries based on existing and projected workforce demographics, educational attainment, skills, and commute patterns, and which provide opportunities to residents living in designated disadvantaged communities.
Grocery Stores in Underserved Communities: The County shall strive to attract and retain high-quality, full-service grocery stores and other healthy food purveyors in Existing Communities and adjacent urban areas, particularly in underserved areas.
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Disproportionate Housing
Problems
Costs of repairs or rehabilitation for older housing stock.
Lack of affordable housing.
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
Safe and Sanitary Homes Education and Outreach: The County shall engage with agencies, non-profit organizations, landlords, property owners and tenants in Disadvantaged Communities to disseminate information to educate about indoor mold and lead hazards, methods for reduction, and prevention. 541
Ventura County Regional AI 75
2. Camarillo
Housing Affordability: The County shall continue to work with cities and community organizations to implement best practices, pursue funding, and implement programs that reduce the cost of housing.
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Disparities in Access to
Homeownership
Unaffordable home prices in coastal communities.
Costs of repairs or rehabilitation for older housing stock.
Lack of economic mobility for protected classes.
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
Provide down payment assistance to eligible potential homeowners.
Guide eligible homeowners in identifying resources for rehabilitation assistance.
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Disparities in Access to
Opportunities
Concentration of protected persons, including, but not
limited to, persons with disabilities and LMI households, in lower resource areas due to the following:
• Disparities in access to housing opportunities due
to high cost of housing in rental and ownership
markets; and specifically, limited affordability in
High Opportunity Areas.
• Lack of vacant land for new development as the
city is nearing build-out.
• High cost of land and construction disincentivize
developers to construct affordable housing
projects.
• Lack of public transportation is an impediment to
those who cannot or do not drive a car if arrival
times are not convenient, not frequent, and overall
have long travel times.
• Lack of available accessible housing options for
seniors and persons with disabilities.
542
Ventura County Regional AI 76
•
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
Increase affordable housing options in high opportunity areas through the following actions:
• Encourage a range of housing options across all income categories, including affordable housing, to allow residential mobility. Provide technical assistance and information (such as the residential sites inventory) to advocacy groups, nonprofit housing, and other local and regional organizations that can assist in identifying housing need and the development of housing for low- and moderateincome households. • Encourage transit-oriented development to better connect workers with jobs. • Encourage development of ADA compliant rental housing units, and promote universal design principles in new developments to help people with physical disabilities live in a house without modification. Specifically, have a goal of developing 30 units for seniors and/or special needs households between 2021- 2029.
• By December 2025, conduct a review of the Municipal Code requirements to explore opportunities to revise and ensure design standards to not impede the development of affordable housing.
• By January 2026, review zoning ordinance and identify opportunities to reduce constraints on the development of housing types, and amend Zoning Ordinance by January 2028.
Address housing discrimination through the following actions:
• Expand education and outreach efforts to landlords on fair housing laws through media outlets available to City. Provide multilingual content when appropriate. • Contract for fair housing services with the Housing Rights Center to include fair housing testing for discriminatory practices, issues, and trends impacting both renters and homebuyers, and require routine reporting of activity. • At least once annually between 2021-2029, conduct or facilitate informational events regarding fair housing laws and available resources in English and Spanish.
Prioritize property owners and residents residing in high displacement risk areas (neighborhoods between Temple Avenue, Lewis Road, Highway 101, Las PosasRoad, and East Ponderosa Drive) and provide informational materials and/or provide trainings in accessing financial resources for housing rental or purchase.
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
543
Ventura County Regional AI 77
Disproportionate Housing
Problems
Home repairs and rehabilitation can be an obstacle for
low- and moderate-income homeowners.
Deferred maintenance can result in severe housing
problems for older housing units.
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
Promote and facilitate the availability of housing rehabilitation programs to address deferred maintenance of the housing stock, and to make accessibility improvements.
Provide multilingual content when appropriate. Specific actions to be taken include:
• Utilize CDBG funding to facilitate the rehabilitation of six housing units annually between 2021-2029.
• Develop an outreach strategy to connect with property owners who own less than 10 single-family or multi-family residential units to assess needs and assist them with obtaining available resources including rehabilitation loan financing programs and affordable housing development incentives.
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Disparities in Access to
Homeownership
Disparities in access to housing opportunities due to high cost of housing in rental and ownership markets.
High cost of land and construction disincentivize
developers to construct affordable housing projects.
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
Implement first time homebuyer down payment assistance program to provide homeownership opportunities to very low-, low-, and moderate-income households.
Provide multilingual content when appropriate.
Include low-income households in the outreach efforts to inform of special local, state, and federal homebuyer assistance in partnership with lending institutions, local associations of realtors, and fair housing providers. Provide multilingual content when appropriate.
By January 2026, conduct an educational seminar to assist residents in applying for first time homebuyer down payment assistance programs. Increase participation in first time homebuyer programs by at least 20 percent between 2021-2029. 544
Ventura County Regional AI 78
3. Oxnard
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Segregation Low-income households are concentrated due to the following factors:
• Coastline neighborhoods are more desirable, and
therefore more costly than urban core.
• Availability of rentals that accept Housing Choice
Vouchers.
• Availability of affordable units in a range of sizes.
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
Use land use, zoning, and development standards to address barriers to housing choices in high-opportunity areas, such as ADUs and minimum lot sizes.
Facilitate lot consolidation for development of affordable housing in high opportunity areas, by reducing setbacks and/or parking requirements, waiving Parcel Assemblage/Lot Consolidation fees for targeted parcels, and fast-tracking application reviews for affordable housing developments.
Encourage landlords in high resource areas to market their rental units to Section 8 voucher holders. To do this, Oxnard Housing Authority will expand their landlord outreach and engagement efforts.
Encourage mixed-use and mixed-income development in non-residential zones, including in the Business Research Park (BRP) Zone through a BRP Overlay Zone.
Encourage construction of ADUs in high resource areas by distributing information to homeowners via informational flyers in monthly bills, additional information on the City’s website, and/or public service announcements on Oxnard TV channel.
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
R/ECAPs Availability of rentals that accept Housing Choice Vouchers.
Linguistic isolation of non-English speaking households.
Limited economic mobility opportunities.
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
545
Ventura County Regional AI 79
Provide training to landlords on fair housing laws and encourage them to market their rental units in high resource to voucher holders.
Distribute information regarding fair housing, tenant rights, rehabilitation grants, rehabilitation loans, first-time homebuyer programs, and Section 8 programs. These efforts will include the following:
• Work with Ventura County Department of Health and Housing Rights Center to track fair housing issues and identify patterns in the City, including meeting annually to check on the status of active cases. The City will support Ventura County and Housing Rights center to increase public education and outreach on neighborhoods identified as being areas of linguistic isolation, as well as continuing to assist in the investigation and resolution of complaints of housing discrimination, including, where merited, targeted testing. This increased outreach shall include, beginning in 2024, at least one educational outreach campaign annually in an area of linguistic isolation, targeting a minimum of at least 25 households in such areas with multi-lingual fair housing education resources. The City will use its partnerships with community-based organizations that work with the Oxnard Mixteco community to provide access to information and resources, and will invite those organizations to participate in the City’s Annual Housing Element workshop.
• Continue working with Ventura County groups who promote expanded housing opportunities through various financial assistance initiatives and affordable housing/neighborhood revitalization programs and educates the community about fair-housing and equal housing opportunity, providing housing counseling services and family resource information and referral. Through this partnership, the City will connect with an average of 320 contacts per year. The City will collaborate with these organizations and the Housing Rights Center (which provides materials in seven languages) to disseminate fair housing information in all appropriate languages, and to encourage community participation in workshops, and public hearings, which shall include at least one fair housing outreach and education workshop annually, beginning in 2024, in the areas of linguistic isolation and in Spanish language.
Actively recruit residents from neighborhoods of concentrated poverty to serve or participate on boards, committees, and other local government bodies.
Seek funding for targeted rehabilitation.
Invest in basic infrastructure in low resource areas and areas of future development, including through the following efforts:
• Utilize the City’s Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) to disseminate community programs to improve climate and resilience citywide with particular attention to disadvantaged community areas as identified in the City’s CAAP. 546
Ventura County Regional AI 80
• As part of the City’s CIP process, prioritize green infrastructure investment (permeable pavements, infiltration planters, trees, etc.) in areas of concentrated poverty, specifically neighborhoods identified as disadvantaged communities. • The City’s Parks and Recreational Master Plan will assist the City in developing CIP activities to improve access to parks and recreational areas, including seeking funding sources to develop and/or improve parks or recreational areas and programs and/or partnerships to access nearby recreational spaces located on sites that are not City-controlled.
• Implement the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Master Plan (2011), with consideration to bicycle and pedestrian facilities in R/ECAP areas.
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Disparities in Access to
Opportunities
Availability of high-ranked schools throughout the City.
Shortage of public access to recreational facilities and parkland.
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
Encourage additional multifamily housing in high-performing school areas, including by using land use, zoning, and development standards to address barriers to housing choices in moderate or higher opportunity areas, such as allowing ADUs and decreasing minimum lot sizes.
Work with school districts to attract and retain high-quality teachers.
Increase parkland requirements for new developments.
Prioritize green infrastructure investment in areas of concentrated poverty.
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Disproportionate Housing
Problems
Availability of affordable units in a range of sizes.
Unaffordable rents and home prices.
Lack of partnerships with affordable housing developers.
Costs of repairs or rehabilitation.
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
547
Ventura County Regional AI 81
4. San Buenaventura
Provide rehabilitation assistance to approximately 6 homeowners per year through the Citywide Homeowner Repair Program.
Implement the Inclusionary Housing Program to increase supply of affordable housing units, with a goal of producing an average of 20 lower-income units per year (18 on site, 2 through in-lieu fees paid).
Provide down payment assistance to four households annually, to support new homeownership opportunities. At least half of the households assisted will originate from low resource areas and/or R/ECAP areas in Oxnard.
Provide mortgage assistance to homeowners through the Mortgage Credit Certificate program, with a goal of Oxnard residents using at least six Mortgage Credit Certificates per year. Continue working with the Ventura County Consortium to distribute funding and ensure outreach to at least twenty-four households in the areas designated as low resource and/or R/ECAPs in Oxnard.
Encourage development of housing for extremely low-income households by assisting developers with site identification, providing local funding, streamlining entitlements, and implementing concessions and incentives.
Collaborate with developers to develop affordable housing on City-owned sites. Between 2021-2029, accommodate 193 units affordable to lower income households on cityowned properties in low resource areas.
Encourage construction of ADUs to increase supply of affordable housing, with the goal of accommodating at least 320 ADUs between 2021-2029.
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Segregation Location and type of affordable housing, and concentration of HCV use.
Lack of private investment.
Lack of public investments in specific neighborhoods,
including services or amenities.
A lack of knowledge of fair housing rights for tenants and responsibilities from landlords, due to the following:
548
Ventura County Regional AI 82
• Lack of fair housing testing
• Lack of monitoring
• Lack of targeted outreach
• Lack of outreach meeting locations within the City,
especially in the Westside NRSA and downtown
and midtown communities.
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
Through the Westside Ventura Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area (NRSA) plan, continue to target investment on improving community assets (such as infrastructure and public facilities) as well as improving quality of housing and increasing affordable housing (one improvement project in low/moderate income areas each year).
Inform tenants and landlords of the State’s Source of Income Protection (SB 329 and SB 222) and the interested parties list for available affordable housing.
Promote access to higher resource areas by locating lower income affordable units and mixed-income developments in areas with high resources.
To attract private investment and the amenities associated with development, remove constraints to development in response to market demands.
Expand awareness of fair housing laws by specifically targeting the Westside NRSA. In partnership with the City’s fair housing provider (Housing Rights Center), the following actions will be taken:
• Hold at least two in-person fair housing meetings annually, including one in the Westside NRSA. Meetings will be held at sites that are transit-accessible and/or the provider will consider options to assist residents without vehicle access with transportation; and meetings will be held at a variety of times (daytime and evening). Each year, the goal will be to conduct outreach to 400 residents, landlords, and housing professionals.
• Provide annual training on fair housing laws at public meetings with the intention of hosting additional meetings.
• Utilize non-traditional media (i.e. social media, City website) in outreach and education efforts, in addition to print media and notices. Each year, the goal will be to post 10 Fair Housing related items on non-traditional media. • Conduct Fair Housing Testing annually (10 tests per year) and include results in the appropriate quarterly report. Tailor outreach and education activities to respond to findings of testing.
Expand outreach and education of the State’s Source of Income Protection (SB 329 and SB 222), defining public assistance including HCVs as legitimate source of income for housing. Increase outreach and education to the Westside and southern tracts with 549
Ventura County Regional AI 83
disproportionate needs. By 2029, goal is to increase voucher use in Ventura by 10 percent from 2021 levels.
Fund and maintain a Housing division within the City’s Community Development Department, including a Housing Manager, to ensure sufficient capacity in City to advance fair housing goals.
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Disparities in Access to
Opportunities
Location of higher quality schools in eastside areas.
Lack of access to local jobs.
Location near environmental pollutants (freeways).
Lack of private investment.
Lack of public investments in specific neighborhoods,
including services or amenities.
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
Improve access to opportunities in low resource areas through the following actions:
• Through the Westside NRSA plan, continue to target investment on improving community assets (such as infrastructure and public facilities) as well as improving quality of housing and increasing affordable housing (one improvement project in low/moderate income areas each year).
• Continue to expand economic development opportunities in the Westside NSRA through microenterprise loans and technical assistance, vocational training to westside residents, and partnerships with Ventura Unified School District on Property Uses for Economic Development.
• Prioritize use of CDBG funds and CIP in high segregation and poverty and low resource areas (such as the Westside and Downtown). CDBG funds should be focused on homelessness or housing projects.
• Study the annexation of the Saticoy low resource area to allow for projects and investment to improve the area.
• Coordinate with Public Works to prioritize areas identified as Disadvantaged Communities (SB 535) and low resource areas for actions and improvements.
Create a Capital Improvement Plan for 2026-2032 with prioritized funding for Disadvantaged Communities.
550
Ventura County Regional AI 84
Promote access to higher resource areas by locating lower income affordable units and mixed-income developments in areas with high resources. Specific actions include:
• Identify specific City-owned properties that may be made available for residential development.
• Support funding applications by nonprofit developers for affordable housing in high resource areas, with overall goal of building 2,052 lower income units between 2021-2029.
• Support development of 100 student housing units at Ventura College. • Update inclusionary housing ordinance to expanded Citywide and include rental developments.
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Disproportionate Housing
Problems
Age of housing stock.
The availability of affordable units in a range of sizes.
Thomas Fire, which destroyed multi-family housing and
caused rent increases.
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
Improve the condition of existing housing by using targeted outreach to increase awareness of the City’s Home Rehabilitation program in neighborhoods with highest housing burdens.
Market the availability of Mobile Home Rehabilitation Grant Program funding by providing brochures to local mobile home park associations, distributing them at relevant public meetings, and displaying them at the City’s public counters, public libraries, and the senior center. Assist an average of 15 households per year.
Increase the availability of affordable rental units through the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.
Combat displacement by offering “first right of refusal” to tenants and advertising new affordable units with Affirmative Marketing Plans.
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Disparities in Access to
Homeownership
The availability of affordable units in a range of sizes. 551
Ventura County Regional AI 85
5. Simi Valley
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
Pursue funding to provide homebuyer assistance to low- and moderate-income households. Between 2021-2029:
• Provide 15-20 Housing Workshops to residents interested in preparing for homeownership
• Provide 20 residents with Down Payment Assistance
• Provide 20 Residents with Housing Counseling Services • Provide 30 Financial Literacy Workshops to 300 Residents Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Segregation Insufficient and inaccessible outreach and enforcement.
Lack of accessible fair housing information and variety of inputs media.
Lack of marketing fair housing events such as fair housing conferences, resource meetings, and community
meetings.
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
The City will serve 150 people annually with fair housing services, through the following actions:
• Continue the contracting with HRC to provide fair housing services to Simi Valley residents.
• Conduct two fair housing outreach events per year, which may include the landlord-tenant workshop and the homebuyer’s education workshop hosted by HRC.
• Increase outreach related to fair housing education and workshop with announcements in monthly City newsletter.
• Expand outreach media on fair housing to City social accounts such as Facebook and Twitter.
• Offer fair housing outreach and education in Spanish and English. 552
Ventura County Regional AI 86
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Disparities in Access to
Opportunities
Concentration of special needs groups.
Location and type of affordable housing.
Lack of private investment.
Lack of sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, and other
infrastructure.
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
Increase access to affordable housing in high resource areas through the following actions:
• Facilitate the development of units affordable to lower-income households in high resource areas (with a portion being targeted for extremely low-income households). Between 2021-2029, develop 20% of new affordable units in high resource areas.
• Facilitate ADU construction in high resource areas by creating and implementing a marketing program to disseminate information about the City’s ADU incentives, tools, and resources.
• Promote Lot Consolidation Incentive and Revitalization of Obsolete and Underused Properties policy to facilitate multi-family and mixed-use development in high resource areas. Conduct outreach to interested property owners and developers, with the goal of increasing housing opportunities in high resources areas by 275 units between 2021-2029.
• Continue to promote the use of Section 8 Vouchers by including a fair housing factsheet in ADU/SB 9 applications, especially on source of income protection (SB 329 and SB 222). Assist 700 households annually with vouchers, and increase the use of HCVs in high resource areas by 5 percent between 2021-2029.
Between 2021-2029, commit to one public improvement project annually in low- and moderate-income areas, including:
• Sanitation – Sewer Line Rehabilitation: rehabilitates vitrified clay sewer pipes and asbestos cement sewer pipes, with cured-in-place slipliner. • Streets and Roads – Barnard Street Bridge Rehabilitation: widening / rehabilitation of the existing bridge on Barnard Street, 0.5 miles west of Stearns Street. • Waterworks – Water Line Replacement: repair or replace as needed aged/damaged/washed out water lines segments. These segments were identified during the Waterworks Facilities Assessment based on calculated risk of waterline failure based on the asset vulnerability and criticality. 553
Ventura County Regional AI 87
• Waterworks – Water Tank Repair / Replacement: repair or upgrade water tanks that have been in service since 1960, each with capacity of upwards of 1.5 million gallons. In addition, tank interiors need to be re-coated and exterior needs to be painted. The Waterworks Storage Tank System shall meet current seismic code requirements.
• Transit – Bus Stops Improvements: bus shelter addition, maintenance, signage, benches, lighting, and other amenities.
• Transit – Replacement Buses: replace two Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) New Flyer buses (has reached its useful life) with two 35-foot low- or no-emission buses to ensure continued reliability of service while reducing maintenance costs.
• Repairs & Upgrades - Public Library: a variety of repair and upgrades including relocation of the Library bookstore and donation space, exterior lighting improvements, book stack end panels, ADA improvements, interior electrical and lighting improvements, window replacements, carpeting, landscaping of patio areas, and various building renovations and improvements. • Repairs & Upgrades - Senior Center: a variety of repairs and upgrades including the design and construction of the patio courtyard, design and renovation of the north bathrooms to improve plumbing and accommodate patron needs, replace facility furniture, refinish wood floors in multi-purpose room, and upgrade audio visual needs in the senior facility.
Between 2021-2029, complete eight street improvement projects in low- and moderateincome areas, including the following streets:
• Cochran Street from Tapo Canyon Road to Sequoia Avenue. • Madera Road from Strathearn Place to Royal Avenue.
• Los Angeles Avenue from Kuehner Drive to Stow Street. • Stearns Street from Cochran Street to Los Angeles Avenue. • Sycamore Drive from Royal Avenue to Fitzgerald Road.
• First Street from Royal Avenue to Fitzgerald Road.
• Erringer Road from Royal Avenue to Moore Street.
• Los Angeles Avenue from Sequoia Avenue to Sycamore Drive.
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Disproportionate Housing
Problems
Substandard Housing Conditions.
Age of housing stock.
Cost of repairs and rehabilitation.
554
Ventura County Regional AI 88
6. Thousand Oaks
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
Through the City’s Home Rehabilitation Program, provide loans to qualified low income homeowners. Target outreach to neighborhoods with older housing stock.
Conduct Code Enforcement with emphasis in neighborhoods with older housing stock and refer eligible households to City Home Rehabilitation Program.
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Segregation
• Location and type of affordable housing, and
concentration of Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV)
use.
• Lack of private investment
• Lack of public investments in specific
neighborhoods, including services or amenities\
•
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
Increase the number of people using HCV and work to increase the use of HCVs , by continued outreach and education of the State’s Source of Income Protection (SB 329 and SB 222, defining public assistance including HCVs as legitimate source of income for housing). Inform tenants and landlords by posting notices on City’s social media platforms, City website and public counter, TOTV, newspaper, and with local stakeholders. Also, ensure Housing Rights Center includes this topic in their outreach events.
Facilitate affordable housing development through the following actions:
• Adopt Zoning Code update to implement General Plan 2045to ensure a variety of housing types can be accommodated, including but not limited to co-housing, live/work, senior housing, and assisted living, among others. • Continue to implement objective development standards that apply to all residential projects, which define all housing types, including small, medium, and large-scale multifamily buildings.
• If City funding is available, issue a NOFA to develop new affordable housing.. 555
Ventura County Regional AI 89
• Continue to implement the City’s updated Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and linkage fees program, to ensure that 10 percent of new construction projects are affordable units or units created with in-lieu fees.
• Continue to encourage lower income affordable units in mixed-income developments.
• Continue to explore options for incentivizing housing development for all income levels at shopping mall sites.
Combat discrimination in housing by taking the following actions:
• Continue to host an annual fair housing seminar with the County of Ventura to increase public awareness of fair housing laws and services, conducting increased outreach to neighborhoods that are impacted by low and moderate income concentration, displacement risks, and disproportionate housing needs.
Follow up with HRC after meetings to evaluate attendance at locations and modify outreach location or times as necessary based on attendance outcomes. • Continue to ensure HRC includes outreach and education of the State’s Source of Income Protection (SB 329 and SB 222), defining public assistance including HCVs as legitimate source of income for housing. Create a Fair Housing Factsheet to be included in ADU and SB 9 application packets, educating homeowners of their fair housing obligations as potential landlords, including source of income protection (such as use of HCVs).
• Continue to provide fair housing information throughout the City via the City’s website, and City facilities. Specifically, utilize non-traditional media (i.e. social media, City website) in outreach and education efforts, in addition to print media and notices.
• Continue to update City’s Fair Housing Resource webpage annually. • Continue to offer Spanish translation services and closed captions at City Council Meetings.
• Continue to encourage residents to sign up for City newsletter by promoting on city website, social media, and at community events.
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Disparities in Access to
Opportunities
• Limited access to local jobs for all residents
• Location near environmental pollutants (freeways)
• Lack of private investment
• Lack of public investments in specific
neighborhoods, including services or amenities
556
Ventura County Regional AI 90
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
Achieve diverse community representation on relevant boards and commissions that reflects the demographics of Low Resource Areas and Sensitive Communities. To achieve this, the City will:
• Continue to encourage residents from low and moderate income neighborhoods and areas impacted by disproportionate housing needs and displacement risks to participate in the decision-making process through appropriate boards and commissions.
• Continue to expand outreach through extensive social media posting and by being in direct contact with various groups, such as the City’s Youth Commission, to encourage participation in the decision-making process. • Report annually on the diversity of commission members (number of applicants and how many are appointed).
Continue to coordinate with Public Works to prioritize areas identified as low resource and sensitive communities in the implementation of the 2019 Active Transportation Plan, Local Road Safety Plan, 2019 ADA Transition Plan, and capital improvement projects, increase transit ridership, add new bike lanes, add new ADA ramps, and construct additional pedestrian crossings.
Continue to implement Objective Standards that require include Open Space amenities for teenagers and younger children in housing projects.
For affordable housing constructed by non-profit developers with City’s funds, prioritize projects in low and moderate resource areas. This prioritization will be incorporated into NOFAs issued by the City.
Continue to partner with the County of Ventura on financial resources for homeless supportive services and affordable housing development.
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
Disproportionate Housing
Problems
• Increasing rental prices
• Age of housing stock
• The availability of affordable units in a range of
sizes
Goals and Meaningful Actions:
557
Ventura County Regional AI 91
Use City funding, if available, to increase the stock of affordable housing in low and moderate resource areas.
558
City of Oxnard
2025 Annual Action Plan
DRAFT
April 2025
Prepared by:
City of Oxnard – Housing Department – Grants Management 435 South D Street, Oxnard, California, 93030
559
AP-15 Expected Resources – 91.220(c)(1,2)
Introduction
In Plan year 2025, the formula grant of HUD allocations to City of Oxnard are estimates CDBG $1,888,317, HOME $535,916 and ESG $175,122, a total of $2,599,355 in entitlement grants from HUD. In addition, estimated program income of $100,000 for CDBG programs and $150,000 for HOME programs. This will increase total available resources from the 2025 Plan year to $2,849,355. The source of program income comes principally from repayment of loans and recaptures from defaults. Those funds will be used towards meeting the goals and objectives of the 2025 Annual Action Plan.
Anticipated Resources
Program Source of Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Narrative Funds Annual Program Prior Year Total: Amount Description Allocation: Income: Resources: $ Available
$ $ $ Reminder
of
ConPlan
$
CDBG public - Acquisition
federal Admin and Planning
Economic Development
Housing
Public Improvements
Public Services
$1,888,317 $100,000 $1,988,317 $9,011,683 Community
Development
Block grant from
HUD to address
housing,
community
development, and
economic
development
needs.
2025 CDBG
Allocation and
AP-15 Expected Resources - 91.220(c)(1,2)
560
Program income is
$1,988,317
available
resources from
CDBG Plan year
2025. Uses of the
available
resources will be
according to the
funding priorities
set forth in the
Regional
Consolidated Plan.
The specific
Activities will be
set up in IDIS
(HUD’s database).
The uses of funds
will be capped
according to the
HUD regulations
for: (1) Admin and
Planning - no
more than 20%, or
$397,663 and (2)
Public Services up
to 15%, or
$298,247. The
2025 balance will
be distributed as
Public
Improvements &
Other Programs as
detailed by the
561
City during the
AAP process.
HOME public- Acquisition
federal Homebuyer Assistance
Homeowner
Rehabilitation
Multifamily Rental
New Construction
Multifamily Rental
Rehabilitation
New Construction for
Homeownership
TBRA
$535,916 $150,000 $685,916 $3,064,084 HOME grant from
HUD to address
affordable
housing needs.
In plan year 2025,
HOME Allocation
is $535,916, and
expected program
income is
$150,000; total of
$685,916. Uses of
funds are; (1)
Administration -
no more than 10%
or $68,591 and
(2) CHDO Set
Asides - at 15% (of
allocation, not
including program
income) or
$80,387. In
addition,
$536,938 is
available for
housing
development. In
addition to the
CHDO set-aside
562
Program Source of Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Narrative Funds Annual Program Prior Year Total: Amount Description Allocation: Income: Resources: $ Available
$ $ $ Reminder
of
ConPlan
$
ESG public
federal
- Conversion and Rehabilitation for
transitional housing
Financial Assistance
Overnight Shelter
Rapid Re-housing (rental
assistance)
Rental Assistance Services
Transitional housing
$175,122 $175,122 $824,878 HEGS grant from
HUD to address
needs and
services for
homeless persons
or persons at risk
of becoming
homeless.
Plan year 2025
available
resources
Estimate for ESG is
$175,122. The
limited availability
of ESG resources
is spread across
the uses identified
in this table. 1)
ESG
Administration
and Planning costs
are no more than
7.5% or $13,143
and (2) Emergency
Shelter and Street
Outreach cost is
563
no more than
60%, or $105,073.
The 2025 balance
will be distributed
as Homeless
Prevention, HMIS,
& Rapid ReHousing eligible
activities as
detailed by the
City during the
AAP process
Table AP-1: Expected
Resources
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied
CDBG funds are leveraged, although not required, by city and subrecipients providers with government agency, in-kind, private foundations and contributions monies who provide services to low/moderate income persons. Affordable housing developments utilizing HOME funds typically use HOME monies to leverage millions of dollars in state, federal, and private financing. ESG funds are matched dollar for dollar by non-profit agencies providers with government agency, in-kind, private foundations, Ventura County Continuum of Care monies who provide critical services such as assisted housing, services and shelter to vulnerable populations who are at-risk of becoming homelessness or homeless persons and families. ESG funds are matched dollar for dollar by Subrecipients. The city matches for the Administration portion only. Per HOME requirements, the HOME funds are matched at a greater than 25% level by recipients of HOME funds, city, and other participants. 564
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan
The city property leased for homeless shelter at 1450 S. Rose Ave, Oxnard, CA Temporary Emergency Shelter at 351 South K Street, Oxnard, CA Oxnard Housing Authority Public Housing Sites
131 Seventh Street
Meta Street Properties (recently acquired)
565
Goals Summary Information
Sort
Order
Goal Name Start
Year
End
Year
Category Geographic
Area
Needs Addressed Funding Goal
Outcome
Indicator
1 Improve Supply of
Affordable Housing
2025 2029 Affordable Housing NA Development of New Affordable Housing
Housing Rehabilitation
Housing Services
Housing Stability
Disaster Planning and Recovery
HOME:
$617,325
CDBG:
$292,407
Rental Units
Constructed:
5 Household
Housing
Units
Rental units
rehabilitated:
10 2 Increase and Improve
Social Services
2025 2029 Non-Housing
Community
Development
NA Supportive Services Fair
Housing Services
Disaster Planning and Recovery
CDBG:
$235,505
Public
Service for
low/moderat
e-income
other than
housing
benefit: 600
235 Persons
Assisted
3 Work to End
Homelessness
2025 2029 Homelessness NA Supportive Services
Homelessness
CDBG:
$62,742
ESG:
$175,122
Public
Service for
low/moderat
e-income
other than
housing
benefit:
1,000
persons
assisted
AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives - 91.220(c)(3)&(e)
566
Rapid
Rehousing:
13 Households
assisted
Emergency
Shelter: 15
Persons
Assisted
4 Create and Maintain
Quality Neighborhood
2025 2029 Non-Housing
Community
Development
NA Public Facility Maintenance
Street Improvements and
Infrastructure
Disaster Planning and Recovery
CDBG:
$1,000,000
Public Facility
or
Infrastructur
e Activities
other than
Low/Modera
te Income
Housing
Benefit:
5,000
persons
assisted
5 Promote Economic
Development
2025 2029 Non-Housing
Community
Development
Economic Support for Small
Businesses and Job Training
0 0
6 Effective Administration 2025 2029 n/a n/a CDBG:
$397,663
HOME:
$68,591
Table AP-2: Goal Summary
567
Goal Descriptions
1 Goal Name Improve Supply of Affordable Housing
Goal
Description
Increase and improve access to public service programs targeting low- and moderate-income residents. 2 Goal Name Increase and Improve Social Services
Goal
Description
Increase the availability of affordable ownership and rental housing through affordable housing construction. 3 Goal Name Work to End Homelessness
Goal
Description
In partnership with the Ventura County Continuum of Care, work to end homelessness within Ventura County by providing housing, emergency shelter and social services to homeless persons or those at risk of homelessness. 4 Goal Name Create and Maintain Quality Neighborhoods
Goal
Description
Enhance and maintain access to livable neighborhoods by improving and maintaining public facilities and infrastructure. 5 Goal Name Promote Economic Development
Goal
Description
Promote economic growth and resilience in small businesses and within the workforce in targeted areas.
Goal Name Effective Administration 6
Goal
Description
Maintain effective housing and community development programs to carry out HUD CPD funded programs and activities. 568
Introduction
The County of Ventura is continuing to focus on addressing basic needs, directing funds primarily towards food, shelter, and jobs. In this challenging economic environment, and with ever decreasing resources, the County is committed to providing these basic services to our most vulnerable citizens.
In an effort to increase the efficiency of grant management, we are consolidating our grant awards to larger projects. This ultimately has resulted in no grant award below $10,000, and a significant reduction in the number of grants administered by staff, making the most efficient use of taxpayer dollars. # Project Name
1 Development of New Affordable Housing
2 Housing Rehabilitation
3 Homelessness
4 Supportive Services
5 Street Improvements and Infrastructure
6 Administration
Table AP-1: Project Information
Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs The priorities outlined above reflect this year’s emphasis on the development of new affordable rental housing for persons of very low and extremely low income, outreach and engagement to persons who are homeless, and the retention of existing housing stock affordable to our low- income residents. Other priorities include infrastructure and public facilities in low-income neighborhoods to support them in their communities. Key obstacles include lack of sufficient funding to satisfy unmet need, very low vacancy rates and lack of affordable rental housing.
AP-35 Projects - 91.220(d)
569
Project Summary Information
Project Name DEVELOPMENT OF NEW AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Target Area NA
Goals Supported IMPROVE SUPPLY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Needs Addressed DEVELOPMENT OF NEW AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Funding HOME: $617,325
Description PARTICIPATION IN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUNDING ASSISTANCE Target Date 6/30/2026
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
5 RENTAL UNITS CONSTRUCTED FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLD Location Description CITY OF OXNARD, CALIFORNIA
1 Planned Activities FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO A COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AT LEAST 5 HOUSING UNITS FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN OXNARD. THIS PROJECT INCLUDES 15% OF HOME ALLOCATION SET ASIDE FOR CHDO'S, OR $80,387 Project Name HOUSING REHABILITATION
Target Area NA
Goals Supported IMPROVE SUPPLY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Needs Addressed HOUSING REHABILITATION
Funding CDBG: $292,407
Description REHABILITATION OF UNITS TO INCREASE THE QUALITY OF AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING UNITS AND/OR PRESERVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY.
Target Date 6/30/2026
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
10 LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS HOUSING UNITS
Location Description VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT CITY OF OXNARD 2 Planned Activities OXNARD HOUSING AUTHORITY WILL PROVIDE REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSING HOUSEHOLDS IN OXNARD.
3 Project Name HOMELESSNESS
AP-38 Project Summary
570
Target Area NA
Goals Supported WORK TO END HOMELESSNESS
INCREASE SOCIAL SERVICES
Needs Addressed HOMELESSNESS
Funding CDBG: $62,742
ESG: $175,122
Description PUBLIC SERVICES SUBJECT TO 15% CAP OF 2025 CDBG ALLOCATION AND PROGRAM INCOME.
HEARTH EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT FUNDS TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO VARIOUS SERVICE PROVIDERS FOR EMERGENCY SHELTER AND STREET OUTREACH SUBJECT TO 60% CAP;
HOMELESS PREVENTION, RAPID RE-HOUSING, AND HMIS ACTIVITIES TO SERVE HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES, AND THOSE AT-RISK OF BECOMING HOMELESS. STREET OUTREACH AND EMERGENCY SHELTER ACTIVITIES WILL BE LIMITED TO 60% OF ESG ALLOCATION ESTIMATED, OR $105,073.
ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING COST SUBJECT TO CAPS (7.5% OF ALLOCATION), ESTIMATED $13,134. ALL ESG SUBRECIPIENTS ARE REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF OXNARD TO PROVIDE MATCHING FUNDS OF A DOLLAR FOR EVERY DOLLAR ESG GRANT DOLLARS RECEIVED.
Target Date 6/30/2025
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
1,000 HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS WILL BE ASSISTED WITH EMERGENCY SHELTER AND SERVICES EMERGENCY SHELTER WILL BE PROVIDED TO 15 INDIVIDUALS AND RAPID REHOUSING WILL BE PROVIDED TO 13 HOUSEHOLDS
Location Description CITY-WIDE; VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT CITY OF OXNARD Planned Activities CDBG FUNDING FOR 1) ASSISTING WITH HOMELESS SERVICES NEEDS BY SHELTER CARE RESOURCES AND 2) EMERGENCY SHELTER SERVICES FOR HOMELESS BY TURNING POINT FOUNDATION ESG FUNDING FOR 1)TURNING POINT FOUNDATION WILL PROVIDE EMERGENCY SHELTER, 2) MERCY HOUSE WILL PROVIDE RAPID REHOUSING, 3) UNITED WAY OF VENTURA COUNTY WILL PROVIDE RAPID REHOUSING AND 4) ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING
Project Name SUPPORTIVE SERVICES
Target Area NA
Goals Supported INCREASE SOCIAL SERVICES
Needs Addressed SUPPORTIVE SERVICES
Funding CDBG: $235,505
Description PUBLIC SERVICES SUBJECT TO 15% CAP OF 2025 CDBG ALLOCATION AND PROGRAM INCOME. FUNDING FOR YOUTH RECREATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS; YOUTH FROM LOW-AND MODERATEINCOME HOUSEHOLDS; HOMELESS SERVICES AND COUNSELING SERVICES 4 Target Date 6/30/2025
571
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
270 YOUTH WILL BE ASSISTED WITH YOUTH SERVICES/RECREATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS IN LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME NEIGHBORHOODS, 80 INDIVIDUALS WILL BE ASSISTED WITH SENIOR SERVICES, 100 LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME INDIVIDUALS WILL BE ASSISTED WITH COUNSELING SERVICES FOR VICTIMS.
Location Description CITY-WIDE; VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT CITY OF OXNARD Planned Activities CITY OF OXNARD RECREATION AT 1) POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE, 2) SOUTHWINDS YOUTH CENTER, AND 3) COLOMIA MEMORIAL PARK VETERANS GYM , SENIOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY 4) PALM VISTA SENIOR CENTER BY THE CITY OF OXNARD AND 5) OXNARD HOUSING AUTHORITY, 6) COUNSELING SERVICES
FOR VICTIMS WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE COALITION FOR FAMILY HARMONY Project Name STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND INFRASTRUCTURE
Target Area NA
Goals Supported CREATE AND MAINTAIN QUALITY NEIGHBORHOODS Needs Addressed STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND INFRASTRUCTURE
Funding CDBG: $1,000,000
Description STREET IMPROVEMENT AND SIDEWALKS WITH ADA ACCESS RAMPS WITHIN LOW- AND MODERATE
INCOME AREAS
Target Date 6/30/2025
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
THIS PROJECT WILL ACCOUNT FOR A NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT IN LOW- AND MODERATEINCOME CENSUS TRACT NEIGHBORHOOD, ESTIMATED AT 5,000 PERSONS Location Description LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME AREAS
5 Planned Activities CAL-GISLER NEIGHBORHOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT AND SIDEWALKS WITH ADA ACCESS RAMPS IN
LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME AREA IN OXNARD
Project Name ADMINISTRATION
Target Area NA
Goals Supported EFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATION
6 Needs Addressed DEVELOPMENT OF NEW AFFORDABLE HOUSINGg
HOUSING REHABILITATION
HOUSING SERVICES
HOUSING STABILITY
HOMELESSNESS
SUPPORTIVE SERVICES
FAIR HOUSING SERVICES
PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
572
STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND INFRASTRUCTURE
ECONOMIC SUPPORT FOR SMALL BUSINESSES & JOB TRAINING
DISASTER PLANNING AND RECOVERY
Funding CDBG: $397,663
HOME: $68,591
Description ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING COSTS SUBJECT TO CAPS FOR EACH FUNDING SOURCE; CDBG (20% of Allocation & PI) AND HOME (10% of Allocation & PI)
Target Date 6/30/2025
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING ACTIVITIES WILL BENEFIT FAMILIES CITYWIDE. AN ESTIMATED 202,000 PERSONS WILL BENEFIT FROM THIS ACTIVITY OF WHICH OVER 60% ARE LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME RESIDENTS.
Location Description CITYWIDE
Planned Activities COORDINATION OF ALL CDBG AND HOME ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING ACTIVITIES 573
Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed The primary national objectives of the ConPlan programs are to benefit LMI residents, therefore, the City’s CDBG funds will be targeted to extremely low-, low-, and moderate-income persons. CDBG funds will be used to serve the LMI persons Citywide and in Low-Moderate Areas (LMA). Also, the City will continue to assist the low- and moderate-income persons citywide with HOME and ESG funds. The City will also be concentrating resources, including the CDBG, HOME and ESG funds within the South Oxnard and La Colonia neighborhoods.
Geographic Distribution
Target Area Percentage of Funds
NA NA
Table AP-2: Geographic Distribution
Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically The need for affordable housing (funded from CDBG and HOME) is present throughout the City. CDBG funds for public improvements are based on LMI persons within LMA Neighborhoods. Regarding the Public Services category of the CDBG funds, the proposed projects will focus on the basic needs of the residents such as mental health, essential and supportive services. The special population such as seniors, homeless and youth will continue to receive their funding for the education needs, shelter support and recreational needs.
Ventura County invests community development resources to address needs of low- and moderate-income persons living throughout the jurisdiction. Each entitlement jurisdiction additionally allocates resources that geographically target specific neighborhoods in which the majority of residents are low- and moderateincome. With limited resources, each community identifies opportunities to target resources at areas that have the greatest need or that would maximize the impact of the investment.
Individual activities funded by the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program are designed to benefit low- and moderate-income (LMI) persons or, in the case of activities like parks and streets, areas where at least 51 percent of the residents are low- and moderate-income persons.
ESG allocations are based on the limited clientele distributed citywide. HOME funds are distributed based on the income eligibility of the clients and citywide basis.
Supporting efforts in South Oxnard and La Colonia will support two of the most vulnerable and older communities with housing, services and economic stability through up and coming programs.
Discussion
As always, the City of Oxnard will continue to look for available public and private resources and creative ways to fund the needy programs.
AP-50 Geographic Distribution - 91.220(f)
574
Introduction
HOME funds will be used to provide gap-financing assistance for new construction of multi-family rental units for lower income households. The first phase of Cypress Place, a 90-unit 100% affordable rental development, has been awarded a gap-financing loan of $1,600,000 in HOME funds for the construction of the 90 unit development and $1,500,000 CDBG funds for construction of off-site improvements. Cypress Place will include 15 HOME assisted units and is estimated to be completed in fall 2025.
The Etting Road (Dolores Huerta Garden) Apartments, a 58-unit 100% affordable rental development, has been awarded a gap-financing loan of $1,854,000 in HOME funds for construction of the 58 unit development. Eleven of the units developed in the Etting Road Apartments will be HOME assisted units and are estimated to be completed in Spring 2025. Given that only Dolores Huerta Gardens is expected to be completed in Spring 2025 and Cypress Place is not expected to be completed until fall 2025 then there are only 11 HOME assisted units expected to be completed in FY 2024-2025. A total of 26 HOME assisted units are expected to be completed in calendar year 2025. The City will review new HOME funding applications submitted in FY 2024-2025 and estimates providing gap-financing for the construction of new housing that will result in at least five (5) HOME assisted units. CDBG funds will be used to provide seven residential rehabilitation assistance to eligible households.
Habitat for Humanity of Ventura County will continue to utilize previous years CDBG funds for residential rehabilitation assistance to eligible households. The Ventura County Community Development Corporation (VCCDC) will continue to utilize previous years CDBG grants funds for affordable housing loans for homeownership assistance for income eligible families in Oxnard. HOME development financing assistance will leverage development funds from the State of California, developer equity, private financing, and tax credit financing.
Lower-income households continue to pay a high percentage of their income for housing, compared to other income groups. A large percentage of lower-income renters tend to experience overcrowding and inadequate housing conditions as housing problems. In order to help provide decent and affordable housing, and improve the social and economic status for LMI households in Oxnard, the following programs will be available during the next program year:
1. Homeowner Rehabilitation Assistance Program
2. Homeownership Assistance Programs
3. Construction of new affordable dwelling units
One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported Homeless
Non-Homelessness
Special Needs
Total
0 15
0 15
Table AP-5: One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement AP-55 Affordable Housing - 91.220(g)
575
One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported
Through
Rental Assistance
The Production of New Units
Rehab of Existing Units
Acquisition of Existing Units
Total
0 15
0 0
15 Table AP-6: One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type Discussion
Habitat for Humanity of Ventura County will continue to utilize CDBG grant funds from the previous year for the homeowner rehabilitation assistance program. Ventura County Development Corporation (VCCDC) will continue to utilize CDBG grant funds from the previous years for Oxnard residents to provide a homeownership assistance program. The City of Oxnard’s Affordable Housing and Rehabilitation Department will also continue to provide financial assistance to Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDO) and affordable housing developers to develop affordable housing units throughout the City subject to available funding and as permitted by the funding source. Loan information is provided to interested residents at homeownership fairs, workshops, and from City referrals to VCCDC. 576
Introduction
Oxnard Housing Authority (OHA) currently administers 520 public housing units, 1,904 Section 8 rental assistance vouchers, which includes 77 VASH vouchers, 40 Mainstream vouchers, 10 Family Unification vouchers, 46 Emergency Housing vouchers, and provides support services through its Resident Services program and Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) program. The needs of public housing residents are supported with a Resident Services program which offers a variety of services to families and youth on-site. The FSS program supports and promotes public housing and Section 8 families with homeownership opportunities and economic self-sufficiency. The FSS Program provides one-on-one counseling and individual assistance to families that participate in this program.
Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing Modernization projects for the public housing units, where most needed, are funded through its Capital Fund program. Each year, in its Annual Plan and Statement, the Capital Fund Program re-prioritizes those projects identified in the 5 year plan.
For Fiscal year 2025-2026, the following capital improvement projects for public housing units are planned:
CAL 31-3 Colonia Village 504 Conversion $260,000
CAL 31-3 Colonia Village Alley Repair $140,000
CAL 31-7 Althea Ct Rebuild 8 units $400,000
Total Planned projects for 2025-2026 $800,000
Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership
Homeownership opportunities are promoted by offering public housing families homeownership counseling services by Ventura County Community Development Corporation (VCCDC). In addition, families are informed of these services through its Family Self-Sufficiency Program and distribution of flyers to all households.
Public housing residents are encouraged to participate in public housing tenant associations that advocate on behalf of tenants to support efforts to improve public housing stock and living conditions.
If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance
Not Applicable.
Discussion
In order to respond to the increasing need for affordable housing units within the community, OHA and the Housing Department will continue to seek new resources of financing new housing development projects and partnering with developers, owners, and CHDO's.
AP-60 Public Housing - 91.220(h)
577
Introduction
Jurisdictions that receive federal funds for homeless assistance are typically required to conduct a Point In Time Count (PIT) of homeless persons each year. The PIT count was completed on January 22, 2025, with more than 100 volunteers signing up to participate in Oxnard’s count. The results of this count are still being tabulated by the Ventura County Continuum of Care. The results will be published in their annual Homeless Count and Survey report, expected in Spring 2025.
Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including:
Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs The City of Oxnard continued the operation of a year round homeless shelter and navigation center located on K Street in Oxnard. The City of Oxnard contracted Mercy House to operate the navigation center. The navigation center will continue its operation for the next twelve-month period and beyond. Oxnard has launched an effort to develop a new construction mixed-use development that will include a new, replacement navigation center and 110-bed homeless shelter plus other support services and fifty-six units of permanent supportive housing. We expect that this new project will be in operation by August 2025. The shelter will continue operating at the K Street location until that time.
The City continued working with The Salvation Army to provide street outreach services that include practical assistance, housing navigation, employment assistance, health navigation and crisis intervention with the ultimate goal of transitioning chronically-homeless individuals towards stable housing. The Street Outreach Team coordinates with Mercy House and the Oxnard Navigation Center as well as the Homeless Liaison Officers with the Oxnard Police Department. The City also began a partnership with Mercy House for street outreach services.
This year, the City continued its partnership with Ventura County Health Care Agency to operate an encampment response program as part of the State’s Encampment Resolution Funding program. The program consists of a street outreach and case management team, along with non-congregate emergency shelter by using motel rooms. This project involves proactive engagement with people living in encampments throughout the city, and relocation to non-congregate emergency shelter where clients are connected with a case manager to work towards a housing plan, with the goal of moving into permanent supportive housing.
Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons The emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons are currently being addressed by several service providers throughout Ventura County. The emergency shelter needs in the area are met by the following providers: Mercy Housing in operation of the Oxnard Navigation Center, Ventura County Rescue Mission - single men over the age of 18 with rotating stay schedule, 10 nights in/5 nights out; Kingdom Center - emergency shelter for single women and women with children; Lighthouse Mission for Women and Children - single women and women with children; and Turning Point Foundation - mentally ill individuals.
Transitional housing needs are currently being met by the following providers: Kingdom Center - single women and women with children; Many Mansions - transition aged youth, single women and women with children; AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities - 91.220(i) 578
Turning Point Foundation - single mentally ill persons; Salvation Army - families, single parents and single persons; Ventura County Human Services Agency - families, single parents and children, and single persons.
Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again There are many providers that are working diligently to assist homeless persons from not only finding housing, but also to prevent further incidents of homelessness. The Oxnard Housing Authority designates Homeless Set Aside vouchers in issuance of Housing Choice Vouchers and is actively offering permanent housing opportunities, including through the construction of the Central Terrace, Casa Aliento, and Casa de Carmen permanent supportive housing projects. Specific vouchers that the Oxnard Housing Authority uses to address homelessness include Homeless Set Aside Vouchers, Mainstream Housing Vouchers that are prioritized for non-elderly adults with disabilities who are currently homeless or leaving an institution, and Emergency Housing Vouchers through the American Rescue Plan Act.
The Ventura County Human Services Agency (HSA) utilizes County General Funds to provide eviction prevention and rapid re-housing services to all of these populations; they will continue to do this in the forthcoming operating year. Additionally, Ventura County Veterans Services, Health Care for the Homeless, and Ventura County Behavioral Health all work closely with service providers to provide supportive services to assist in reducing the incidence of homelessness as they have also done in the recent past.
The Oxnard Housing Authority works in conjunction with Veterans Affairs to administer housing vouchers for homeless veterans under the VASH program. This program targets chronically homeless veterans.
Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs.
The Ventura County Continuum of Care has documented discharge policies of all of the above-mentioned services that spell out various directions to ensure persons are not discharged into homelessness. Additionally, as stated earlier, HSA works with qualifying low-income persons and families to avoid homelessness. This is done with the utilization of ESG and Ventura County allocated general fund dollars. Under the CoC discharge policy, in fulfilling the State Mandated Policy (state law related to the discharge protocol), the following are found:
1. Health Care Facilities: the County health care system describes the discharge policy as interdisciplinary responsibility. For the persons who require ongoing medical and nursing care and who have no identifiable address they may be discharged to a respite program at the RAIN project, a County operated transitional housing project. Others, upon discharge routinely go to group homes, board and care facilities, or reunite with families and friends.
2. Mental Health Facilities: the Ventura County Medical Center Psychiatric Inpatient Unit with the collaboration of Ventura County Behavioral Health and various community agencies provides discharge 579
planning and placement assistance to patients, when leaving the mental health facilities.
3. Foster care and other youth facilities: the goal is to provide assisted services to eligible youth and young adults between the ages of 16 and 21 in making a successful transition from foster care to independent living and achieve self-sufficiency. In addition to the County Children and Family Services, a Transitional Age Youth (TAY) center, operated by Pacific Clinics is also available.
4. Corrections programs and institutions: upon release, inmates are able to obtain housing in transitional and permanent housing programs, group homes, and sober living homes as well as with family and friends.
580
Introduction
A barrier to affordable housing is a public policy or nongovernmental condition that constrains the development or rehabilitation of affordable housing, such as land use controls, property taxes, state prevailing wage requirements, environmental protection, cost of land and availability of monetary resources. Barriers to affordable housing are distinguished from impediments to fair housing choice in that barriers are lawful and impediments to fair housing choice are usually unlawful.
Barriers or constraints to the affordability of housing exist in many forms. A particular building code that to one sector might be interpreted as a “negative” public policy that acts as a barrier to affordable housing may to another sector be seen as a life-saving necessity – for example, seismic safety construction requirements.
The same can be said for zoning and land use regulations. It should be noted that in Ventura County, local growth limitations have been adopted by direct ballot measures. Some of these measures entail costs which can affect housing supply and the cost of housing that is produced.
Barriers to exit homelessness include the lack of a permanent, year round shelter and the lack of housing units for those at the very low- and low- income spectrum. Because of the high cost to develop housing for these populations and limited public funding to subsidize the development of new affordable housing units, developers often do not have the resources to develop the number of units necessary to house this population.
When this occurs, badly needed units go undeveloped, thus further limiting housing opportunities for those hardest to house.
Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment The state of California mandates that jurisdictions include seven elements in their General Plans: land use, transportation, conservation, noise, open space, safety, and housing. Two of these elements – the Housing and Land Use Elements – can directly impact local housing markets because they define key parameters for housing development such as permitted density, required fees, and allowable zoning uses.
The Housing Element details a local government’s strategy to address their jurisdiction’s housing needs and regulate existing and future housing development. In California, the state outlines statutory requirements for each community’s Housing Element which are then subject to review by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for compliance with state law. Enacted in 1969, the Housing Element law requires that local governments adequately plan to meet the existing and projected housing needs of all economic segments of the community. The law acknowledges that for the private market to adequately address housing needs and demand, local governments must adopt land use plans and regulatory systems that provide opportunities for and do not unduly constrain housing development.
Environmental review, general planning, zoning, and related local land use regulations and development standards are all extensions of local government police powers to protect life and property, minimize nuisances, and achieve a desired quality of life as expressed through a participatory democratic process. Certain barriers AP-75 Action Plan Barriers to Affordable Housing - 91.220(j) 581
to affordability are imposed by the mandates created by State Law (such as preparing and adopting a General Plan and conducting environmental reviews), are adopted for safety or civil rights reasons (such as the imposition of seismic construction standards in quake-prone areas, or requiring compliance with accessibility or visibility design standards), or enacted to remedy or prevent a specific local issue (such as requiring landscaping to deter graffiti). The term “barrier” should not be interpreted in the context that local development standards and development review procedures are inhibiting the provision of quality affordable housing that would otherwise be developed, but are the cumulative effect of the development requirements imposed by the layers of government regulations and laws that impact residential development.
Discussion:
The City strives to consistently implement all policies and procedures, to review local development standards and development review procedures in such a way as to avoid and ensure that such do not have unintended negative consequences, and to improve policies and procedures so as to increase the opportunities and feasibility of developing affordable housing, especially for special needs and very low- and low-income units).
The City will continue to engage in these efforts to identify and minimize any barriers over which the City has legal authority, in accordance with applicable law.
582
Introduction
The City will implement the goals and strategies of the Regional Consolidated Plan to achieve the other actions listed in the next section.
Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs The City will continue to utilize available resources to fund administrative support activities to meet the underserved needs in the community. The City will continue to work with the appropriate state agencies to administer the assets of the former redevelopment agency in the appropriate manner, and to the benefit of the LMI community whenever possible and feasible. Other obstacles include the following:
Limited availability of funding from federal, state and other sources; High cost of housing and provisions in the area which increases the difficulty of meeting affordable housing needs;
Reduced or frozen funding from state and other sources due to inadequate state revenue; the housing and credit crisis causing a negative effect;
A tight job market has produced an increased demand for production of new housing which is not being met, increasing home prices. Salaries are not commensurate with the high cost of housing in this market. These two factors combine to exacerbate the affordability crisis; and, The Credit Crisis. Credit crisis has limited the availability of capital to develop housing for low-and moderateincome households and special needs groups. City staff will address the challenges of existing and new obstacles in PY 2025 by focusing on the following programmatic and administrative areas: Staff will continue to research the availability of future funding resources that leverage the development of affordable housing units, inclusive of grants, bond financing, Section 108 funding and partnering with other affordable housing developers. CDBG and other funds will be used to fund administrative support for programs that serve the needs of LMI citizens citywide. This is especially critical now that no redevelopment agency funding is available, given that redevelopment agencies no longer exist in California. Staff will continue to collaborate with privatesector partners when appropriate in the development and construction of affordable housing. Staff will continue to collaboratively work with the service provider community, non-profit organizations, and neighboring cities and local governmental agencies within the County of Ventura to identify projects that also meet federal community development program eligibility and which can comply with timely draw-down requirements.
Per the regulation CFR 92.251 (a)(2)(vi), broadband infrastructure, the City incorporates this regulation into each HOME agreement to ensure federal compliance with this statute Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing AP-85 Other Actions - 91.220(k)
583
The City utilizes its Inclusionary Housing Program to provide significant numbers of affordable housing units.
The City’s Inclusionary Housing Program is one of forty-four programs identified in the City’s 2021-2029 Housing Element identified to facilitate the construction of new affordable housing and to conserve and rehabilitate existing housing. To ensure that Oxnard has enough opportunity sites suitable for residential development and to meet the 2021-2029 Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) affordable allocation of 2,911 lower income units, the City is relying on the following:
The Affordable Housing (AH) additive zones (see Supplement 1) with an inventory of 2,466 units on sites
44 Vacant and Underutilized Sites (see Supplement 1)
224 units on Pending Specific Plans
165 units on Pending Annexations
490 Project Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)
The City of Oxnard has adopted several ordinances that establish inclusionary affordable housing requirements for new developments. Relevant ordinances are City Council Ordinances 2980 and 2999. The Inclusionary Housing Program, pursuant to Ordinance 2980, provides for in-lieu fee payments that can replace the on-site units within a development subject to approval by the City Council. The City adopted updated In-Lieu fees on June 2, 2020. In-lieu fees for development project are as follows:
For-Sale Units: If the in-lieu request is granted, the developer is required to make a payment of $39,416 for each single-family home and $38,321 for each multi-family for sale unit in the development. Thereafter, every July 1st these fees will be adjusted by the percentage increase or decrease for the prior twelve months as determined by the Engineering News Record Building Cost Index for the Los Angeles Region.
Rental Units: If the in-lieu request is granted, the developer is required to make a payment of $30,656.83 for each multi-family rental unit in the development. Thereafter, every July 1st this fee will be adjusted by the percentage increase or decrease for the prior twelve months as determined by the Engineering News Record Building Cost Index for the Los Angeles Region.
In-lieu payments are made when the developer applies for building permits for the approved units. The in-lieu fees collected provide funding support in the form of developer loans to new affordable housing projects and are almost always leveraged with other funding sources. The current in-lieu fund balance is approximately $1.9 million.
Possible incentives to be offered by the City’s Community Development Department may include, but are not limited to, the following:
Expedited/streamlined application processing and development review Modification of development requirements, such as reduced setbacks and parking standards on a caseby-case basis Existing incentives include the State Density Bonus Program and Down payment Assistance to low-income residents looking to buy a new home via the City’s agreement with the Ventura County Community 584
Development Commission to administer a Down payment Assistance Program with the use of City CDBG funds.
The City’s Affordable Housing Additive Zone offers developers the ability to build 30 units to the acre in designated parcels throughout the City in exchange for making 20% of the units affordable.
Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards
Any rehabilitation activities on housing units constructed prior to 1978 will have lead hazards identified and actions taken to remove the hazard. The City's Affordable Housing Division does not own or manage any housing units. All units for which HOME and CDBG assistance is provided for homebuyer assistance or homeowner rehabilitation are administered in compliance with HUD's HOME or CDBG regulations for leadbased paint, as applicable. With respect to units owned or assisted by the Oxnard Housing Authority, there have been no cases of Public Housing tenants and/or Section 8 participant households reporting or having been discovered to have poisoned children or any child with “Elevated Blood Lead Level”. OHA staff provides a brochure related to lead based paint hazards to all new tenants and program participants. Maintenance staff attends training and seminars to stay current with the State of California Lead Awareness Training requirements.
Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families Eliminating poverty is a clear concern in Oxnard and Ventura County in general. Efforts are constantly underway to improve the quality of life and economic well-being of the residents through collaborative efforts of the following agencies and their programs to provide needed skills for individuals seeking jobs and thereby getting them out of poverty:
City Corp
Oxnard Housing Authority
County of Ventura-Human Services Agency
City's youth programs such Police Activities League programs and Southwinds Youth Center programs Actions planned to develop institutional structure
Extensive public and private partnerships have been established and organized to address the City's housing, homeless, and community development needs: Entitlement Grants workshops and training, Affordable Housing workshops for homeowners, Fair Housing training and other scheduled meetings (such as Pre-construction meetings, Commission on Homelessness meetings, and meetings with County Continuum of Care Council, Housing Committee meetings).
Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies The City will continue to collaborate with public and private housing and social service agencies to meet the goals and objectives of the Consolidated Plan. This could be from ongoing meetings, special meetings and task force.
585
Discussion:
The City anticipates new inclusionary affordable housing to be developed within several proposed specific plans and other new projects, including the Central Terrace Apartments, which will include 9 City inclusionary units as well as 77 other 100% affordable units. The Casa de Carmen project (formally known as 2nd and B and the Homeless Solutions Center) will provide 6 City inclusionary units as well as 49 other 100% affordable units. Based on a thorough review, the City does not believe that the current inclusionary housing program is a constraint to the development of housing in addition to the incentives and concessions currently being offered and conversations with local developers who have been able to work within the requirement of the inclusionary housing program and produce housing. To further ensure the program does not pose a constraint, the City has included a monitoring process.
Other actions that the City of Oxnard will continue to improve compliance assessment for all its HUD funded programs and projects by 1) monitoring program and financial performance; 2) compliance with Environmental review: each project is reviewed for compliance with the National Environmental Protection Act. The City will utilize a consulting agreement to assist and perform the environmental reviews for housing developments and facility improvement projects, more complicated, and time consuming projects; 3) Labor Compliance Act; 4) Section 3 Compliance; 5) Procurement and Purchasing: The City has its own procurement and purchasing policies managed by staff in the Finance Department; 6) Partnerships with Citizen Advisory Groups: Inter-Neighborhood Council Forum, Commission on Homelessness, Parks and Recreation and Community Services Commission, Mobile home Park Rent Review Board, and Senior Services Commission.
Continued Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing:
The affordable housing additive zones, adopted on October 19, 2021 via Ordinance 2999, are zoning designations that provide opportunities and incentives for the development of affordable residential housing to help the City reach its regional housing needs allocation (RHNA). 586
Program Specific Requirements
AP-90 Program Specific Requirements - 91.220(l)(1,2,4)
Introduction
The information in this section pertains to requirements set forth in HUD regulations that are specific to the CDBG, HOME, and ESG programs.
Community Development Block Grant
Program (CDBG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(1)
Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out.
1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed
2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 0
3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0
4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan 0
5. The amount of income from float-funded activities 0
Total Program Income:
Other CDBG Requirements
1. The amount of urgent need activities 0
2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income.
Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 100.00% 587
HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(2)
1. A description of other forms of investment being used beyond those identified in Section
92.205 is as follows:
Other forms of local investments for housing that may be available to projects include financing from the City’s in-lieu fees, CDBG, Housing Successor Agency Funds, and Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funding. The City also applies for competitive grants in support of affordable housing initiatives and partners with other housing organizations to assist in housing low-income and the unhoused with permanent housing options.
CDBG funds are currently being used for home ownership assistance through a subrecipient.
2. A description of the guidelines that will be used for resale or recapture of HOME funds when used for homebuyer activities as required in 92.254, is as follows:
The City does not have a resale provision, therefore the City's policy is to recapture the funds for future HOME-eligible activities. Below describes the City's recapture provisions and procedures.
Recapture Provisions
In the event that the homebuyer fails to satisfy the requirements during the term of the loan, or otherwise defaults, the City shall exercise its legal rights, as set forth in the promissory note and deed of trust, in order to recover the monetary assistance previously provided to the maximum extent permitted by law.
If the recapture provisions are triggered by a sale of the housing unit, (whether voluntary or involuntary – such as foreclosure) or other default, the City shall take all necessary steps to recover the full amount of HOME funds from the net proceeds. The phrase ‘net proceeds’ is defined as the sales price, minus the loan repayment of the first trust deed (other than HOME funds) and any closing costs.
The HOME Program regulations allow the City to recapture the entire HOME Subsidy, in the event the loan recipient violates the affordability and or term period requirements. However, should the ‘net proceeds’ not cover the entire HOME Subsidy or not cover any of the HOME Subsidy, the City is required to forgive the remaining balance of the direct HOME Subsidy.
During the term of the loan, the homeowner must repay the loan if it is sold, transferred or refinanced without the City’s permission and/or with cash out to the homeowner or the homeowner does not occupy the residence as a primary residence.
Procedures
The City utilizes an agreement which includes restrictions, and a promissory note secured by a deed of trust which is recorded with the Ventura County Recorder’s Office.
Staff monitors and requires certification annually by the homeowner that the property is owner-occupied 588
to determine if recapture provisions shall be invoked upon discovery of violations for owner-occupancy or unauthorized transfers.
The City will exercise the rights stipulated in the promissory note, secured by the deed of trust that was recorded with the County Recorder’s Office.
Should Borrower transfer (as that term is defined in the Note) the Property during the occupancy period, City shall require that Borrower pay from the net proceeds the full amount of the Loan. For purposes of this Loan Agreement, “net proceeds” shall mean the sales price minus loan repayment (other than CDBG funds) and closing costs.
In the event net proceeds are not sufficient to discharge the full amount of the Loan during the occupancy period plus enable the Borrower to recover his or her initial investment in the Property and documented costs of any capital improvements, Borrower shall share the net proceeds with City. The City’s share of the net proceeds shall be calculated as follows:
(Amount of Loan / Amount of Loan + Borrower’s Investment) = % of Net Proceeds that City is entitled to.
Should the net proceeds not discharge the full amount of the Loan, City shall forgive the remaining balance.
3. A description of the guidelines for resale or recapture that ensures the affordability of units acquired with HOME funds? See 24 CFR 92.254(a)(4) are as follows:
During the affordability period, the homeowner must resell to another low-income homebuyer if the property is refinanced without the City’s permission and/or with cash out to the homeowner or the homeowner does not occupy the residence as a primary residence.
The original homebuyer receives a fair return on investment, (i.e., the homebuyer’s down payment plus capital improvements made to the house. It is important to note that in certain circumstances, such as a declining housing market where home values are depreciating, the original homebuyer may not receive a return on his or her investment because the home sold for less or the same price as the original purchase price); and
In the event that the homebuyer fails to satisfy the requirements during the term, or otherwise defaults, the City shall exercise its legal rights, as set forth in the Resale Restriction Agreement.
Procedures
The City utilizes a Resale Restriction Agreement (RRA) secured by a deed of trust which is recorded with the Ventura County Recorder’s Office.
Staff monitors and requires certification annually by the homeowner that the property is owner-occupied to determine if resale provisions shall be invoked upon discovery of violations for owner-occupancy or unauthorized transfers.
If the homeowner defaults or fails to satisfy requirements during the term, the City will exercise the rights stipulated in the Resale Restriction Agreement.
589
Property must be sold to an eligible low-income homebuyer which shall acquire the unit subject to the continuation of restrictions provided in the RRA through an assumption agreement.
The purchase price must be affordable for a low-income household who earns up to 80% of the area median income, provided by HUD. The monthly cost for principal, interest, taxes, insurance, HOA fees, utilities, and maintenance should not be more than 30% of the monthly income for the household or otherwise stated in the RRA. There is no preference to a particular segment of the low-income population.
The resale price is calculated using one of two methods described below. The method used is identified in the RRA:
Determined as the affordable housing cost for a family at 80% of AMI paying no more than 30% of the monthly income for the household or in accordance of California Health And Safety Code 50025.5, whichever is lesser, but not less than the original price paid by homebuyer, or Determination using a CPI method to calculate the increase (or decrease) in value of the property. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles-RiversideOrange Counties Area (all items based 1982-1984=100) provides the CPI on the date of the calculation and the CPI on the purchase date. The calculation is the CPI on the date of the calculation minus the CPI on the purchase date, plus the cost of improvements to property evidenced with receipts, less 7% depreciation, plus the costs of bringing the housing unit up to current building codes and in a salable condition.
4. Plans for using HOME funds to refinance existing debt secured by multifamily housing that is rehabilitated with HOME funds along with a description of the refinancing guidelines required that will be used under 24 CFR 92.206(b), are as follows:
The City currently does not have any plans to invest HOME funds in this type of activity.
Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG)
Reference 91.220(l)(4)
1. Include written standards for providing ESG assistance (may include as attachment) The City does not provide any direct client assistance under the ESG program. All written standards vary by service providers and assistance type. However, all providers must ensure recipients meet the minimum qualifications established by HUD for each eligible funded activity. The Ventura County Continuum of Care maintains a Written Standards for HUD CoC and ESG document for subrecipients of ESG funds.
2. If the Continuum of Care has established centralized or coordinated assessment system that meets HUD requirements, describe that centralized or coordinated assessment system.
The Regional Ventura County Continuum of Care Alliance has established a centralized or coordinated assessment system, Pathways to Home, that provides coordination intake as well as systems to avoid duplication of effort and redundancies.
590
Pathways to Home is centralized to provide identical information and system-wide tracking through HMIS, of all homeless individuals who seek and /or receive assistance at any one of the various service providers, or through the County directly.
3. Identify the process for making sub-awards and describe how the ESG allocation available to private nonprofit organizations (including community and faith-based organizations).
The process for making all sub-awards for ESG recipients are as follows:
a. The City formally posts the Notice of Available Funds (NOFA) in the regional newspaper, on the City's website, and emails and paper mail are sent to all existing and potential service providers from Ventura to Los Angeles.
b. All interested agencies attend information workshop/application training on the process, which includes all deadline dates and times.
c. Interested agencies then submit their application, project overview and qualifications d. The funding recommendations are adjusted to meet the available resources and cap requirements; reviewed by management and then submitted to the City Council for approval. e. All applicants are contacted and urged to attend the City Council meeting in which the items fall on the agenda. All supporting comments and grievances are done at this time. f. The Mayor and City Council directs the City Manager and staff to move forward with final processing.
g. Staff prepare all contracts for execution. Additionally, all internal processes are completed in order to encumber funds to each individual agency.
h. Contracts are completed and services can begin on July 1. i. All ESG contracts are awarded for two years
4. If the jurisdiction is unable to meet the homeless participation requirement in 24 CFR 576.405(a), the jurisdiction must specify its plan for reaching out to and consulting with homeless or formerly homeless individuals in considering policies and funding decisions regarding facilities and services funded under ESG.
The City meets the homeless participation requirement by having formerly homeless City staff involved in the consideration of policies and funding decisions regarding facilities and services funded under ESG. Formerly homeless City staff also serve on the Ventura County Continuum of Care Governance Board. In addition, each entity receiving City ESG funding is also asked to provide information as to how they involve the homeless
5. Describe performance standards for evaluating ESG.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Performance measures are in place to ensure the efficient administration of all ESG funded activities.
Additionally, along with the utilization of the HMIS, these measures will hopefully help to reduce the length of time of family and individuals remain homelessness, reduce the overall incidence of homelessness, and monitor the overall use of emergency shelters. Some of the activity measures are as follows:
• Emergency Shelters: Excluding winter shelters, must be able to document placement of a minimum of 591
10 percent of the homeless persons or households served in the Program Year into transitional or permanent housing.
• Transitional Housing: must be able to document placement of a minimum of 50 percent of the households who completed the transitional housing program in the Program Year into permanent housing. "Household" is defined as all clients including single individuals and families. • Rapid Re-housing: must show continued housing of clients receiving assistance for at least three months after receiving assistance. This should be done via case management of clients, documentation and HMIS entry and exit dates.
• Eviction Prevention: must show continued housing of clients receiving assistance for at least three months. This should be done via case management of clients, documentation and HMIS entry and exit dates.
• All clients, with the exception of victims of domestic violence, must be entered into the Regional HMIS within 15 days of receiving service(s), and must be exited from the system within 30 days of program completion or termination.
• MINIMUM STANDARDS: Sub-grantees are expected to have taken steps to meet the Minimum Standards for Homeless Programs within thirty days of executing the Program Year contract. • BUILDING AND HABITABILITY STANDARDS: Any building for which ESG funding is used for renovation, major rehabilitation or conversion must meet local government safety and sanitation standards. In addition, the Sub-Grantee must meet a number of basic standards to ensure that shelter and housing facilities funded through the ESG program are safe, sanitary and adequately maintained. • MONITORING: City staff will monitor the use of grant funds through a combination of a thorough review of submitted reports, review of audit or financial statements, and monitoring and site visits.
The City will continue to develop and implement eligible activities using the grant funds and through the monitoring and review processes and techniques in order to comply with the federal specific requirements.
Discussion:
The Homeless Services Division continues to fund all the activities prescribed in the HEARTH act. With the subrecipients’ partnership, the City's ESG will continue to provide substantial additional leverage funds to invest in the various programs in order to assist the homeless population toward the goal of reduction and ending homelessness. Also, ESG limits the cost categories for administration and planning to 7.5%, and no more than 60% for street outreach and emergency shelter. The remaining balance supports rapid rehousing programs and Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) licensing. 592
CITY OF OXNARD
2025 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (AAP)
Applications- CDBG & ESG
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
PUBLIC SERVICES- not more than 15%
APPLICANT PROGRAM NAME
Recommended to AwardNot
Recommended
Reason when not
recommended
$ 298,247
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS & OTHER PROGRAMS PROGRAM NAME
Recommended to
award
Not
Recommended
Reason when not
recommended
$ 1,292,407
$ 397,663
TOTAL CDBG GRANT ESTIMATE $ 1,988,317
Oxnard Cultural & Community Services Department Palm Vista Senior Center $ 30,000 Oxnard Cultural & Community Services Department- RecreationColonia Memorial Park Veterans Gym $ 20,000 Oxnard Cultural & Community Services Department- Recreation Police Activities League - PAL $ 80,000 Oxnard Cultural & Community Services Department- Recreation Southwinds Youth Center $ 30,505 Oxnard Housing Authority Senior Supportive Services $ 50,000 Shelter Care Resources
Foundation First Basic Needs
Assistance $ 35,000
The Coalition for Family Harmony
Counseling Services for Survivors
of Interpersonal Violence $ 25,000
Turning Point Foundation
Our Place Safe Haven: Emergency
Shelter and Multi-service Navigation Center $ 27,742
Livingston Memorial Visiting Nurse Association Subsidized Health Care $30,000 The Salvation Army
Emergency Rental Assistance
Program $40,000
United Way of Ventura County Supportive Services $40,000 Oxnard Public Works
Cal Gisler Neighborhood Street
Resurfacing and ADA
Improvement Project $ 1,000,000
Oxnard Housing Authority
201 S. D Street Apartments
Rehabilitation $ 292,407
Habitat for Humanity of Ventura County Habitat Home Repair Program $100,000 Ventura County Community Development
Corporation (VCCDC)
Hope to Home Down Payment
Assistance $250,000
Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation
Villa Cesar Chavez Apartments
Rehabilitation $85,000
Many Mansions
Rehabilitation of Heating System
at D Street Apartments $42,025
Upwards Care, Inc. Boost $400,000
Housing Department-Grants Management CDBG Administration & Planning The total Public Service funding requested
amounted to $659,000, while the available
funding is $298,247. Applications were
evaluated based on several factors, including
the quality of responses, measurable
outcomes, clear objectives, budget
justification, experience, capacity, and
qualifications. The most competitive
applications were selected for funding.
Applicant has an existing award with funding
remaining.
Applicant has an existing award with funding
remaining.
The total Public Improvements & Other
Programs funding requested amounted to
$2,169,432 (not including 1 request received
that was missing the actual application form) while the available funding is $1,292,407.
Applications were evaluated based on several
factors, including the quality of responses, measurable outcomes, clear objectives, budget justification, experience, capacity, and
qualifications. The most competitive
applications were selected for funding.
Total Public Services Projects
Total Public Improvements & Other Programs
593
EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG)
HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP (HOME)
RECIPIENT DEPT/DIV-ORGANIZATION PROGRAM NAME
Recommended to AwardNot
Recommended
Reason when not
recommended
TOTAL ESG GRANT ESTIMATE $ 175,122
RECIPIENT DEPT/DIV-ORGANIZATION PROGRAM NAME
Recommended to Award
TOTAL HOME GRANT ESTIMATE $ 685,916
ENTITLEMENTS GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATE $ 2,849,355
Oxnard Housing Department-Homeless Division
ESG Administration & Planning
(7.5 %) $ 13,134
Mercy House Rapid Re-Housing $ 68,730
United Way of Ventura County Rapid Re-Housing $ 40,000
Turning Point Foundation
Our Place Safe Haven: Emergency
Shelter $ 53,258
The Kingdom Center Emergency Shelter $30,000
Oxnard Homeless Prevention Program
Oxnard Homeless Prevention
Program $10,000
Shelter Care Resources Motel Voucher Program $74,440
Oxnard Housing Department - Affordable Housing & Rehabilitation Division (AHRD)HOME Administration & Planning (10 %) $ 68,591
Oxnard Housing Department - AHRD CHDO Set-Aside (15%) $ 80,387 Oxnard Housing Department - AHRD
Affordable Housing Development
Project $ 536,938
The total ESG funding requested amounted to
$303,170, while the available funding is $161,988.
Applications were evaluated based on several
factors, including the quality of responses, measurable outcomes, clear objectives, budget justification, experience, capacity, and
qualifications. The most competitive applications were selected for funding. 594
1 2025 AAP 031125 CC 5.7.24
CITY OF OXNARD
2025 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (AAP)
FUNDING RECOMMENDATION
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
CDBG AVAILABLE RESOURCES ESTIMATE
HUD CDBG Allocation (ESTIMATE)
($ 1,888,317)
Program Income (Estimate) ($ 100,000)
TOTAL CDBG GRANT RESOURCES ($ 1,988,317)
CDBG EXPENDITURES
RECIPIENT DEPT/DIV-ORGANIZATION PROGRAM NAME
ADMINISTRATION - 20%
Housing Department-Grants Management CDBG Administration & Planning ($ 397,663) ($ 397,663)
PUBLIC SERVICES- not more than 15%
Oxnard Cultural & Community Services Department Palm Vista Senior Center ($ 30,000) Oxnard Cultural & Community Services DepartmentRecreation Colonia Memorial Park Veterans Gym ($ 20,000) Oxnard Cultural & Community Services DepartmentRecreation Police Activities League - PAL ($ 80,000) Oxnard Cultural & Community Services DepartmentRecreation Southwinds Youth Center ($ 30,505) Oxnard Housing Authority Senior Supportive Services ($ 50,000) Shelter Care Resources Foundation First Basic Needs Assistance ($ 35,000) The Coalition for Family Harmony
Counseling Services for Survivors of Interpersonal
Violence ($ 25,000)
Turning Point Foundation
Our Place Safe Haven: Emergency Shelter and Multiservice Navigation Center ($ 27,742) Total Public Services Projects ($ 298,247)
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS & OTHER PROGRAMS
Oxnard Public Works
Cal Gisler Neighborhood Street Resurfacing and ADA
Improvement Project ($ 1,000,000)
Oxnard Housing Authority 201 S. D Street Apartments Rehabilitation ($ 292,407) Total Public Improvements & Other Programs ($ 1,292,407) TOTAL CDBG GRANT EXPENDITURES ($ 1,988,317)
595
2 2025 AAP 031125 CC 5.7.24
EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG)
ESG AVAILABLE RESOURCES ESTIMATE
HUD ESG Allocation (ESTIMATE) ($ 175,122)
TOTAL ESG GRANT RESOURCES
($ 175,122)
RECIPIENT DEPT/DIV-ORGANIZATION PROGRAM NAME
Oxnard Housing Department-Homeless Division ESG Administration & Planning (7.5 %) ($ 13,134) Mercy House Rapid Re-Housing ($ 68,730)
United Way of Ventura County Rapid Re-Housing ($ 40,000) Turning Point Foundation Our Place Safe Haven: Emergency Shelter ($ 53,258) TOTAL ESG GRANT EXPENDITURES ($ 175,122)
HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP (HOME)
HOME Available Resources ESTIMATE
HUD HOME Allocation (ESTIMATE) ($ 535,916)
Program Income (Estimate) ($ 150,000)
TOTAL HOME GRANT RESOURCES ($ 685,916)
Oxnard Housing Department - Affordable Housing &
Rehabilitation Division (AHRD) HOME Administration & Planning (10 %) ($ 68,591) Oxnard Housing Department - AHRD
CHDO Set-Aside (15%)
($ 80,387)
Oxnard Housing Department - AHRD Affordable Housing Development Project ($ 536,938) TOTAL HOME GRANT EXPENDITURES ($ 685,916)
ENTITLEMENTS GRAND TOTAL ($ 2,849,355)
596
2025-2029 VENTURA COUNTY REGIONAL CONSOLIDATED PLAN,
2025-2029 VENTURA COUNTY REGIONAL ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS
TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE
&
2025-2026 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
Brenda Lopez, Interim Housing Director
City Council
May 6, 2025
597
Background
1. The City of Oxnard receives three entitlement grants from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) – the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), the HOME Investment Partnerships Act program (HOME), and the Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) on an annual basis.
2. To receive the grants, the City of Oxnard must submit and receive approval of a Consolidated Plan, an Annual Action Plan, and an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice.
3. HUD approved the City of Oxnard’s participation in the five-year, 2020-2024 Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan (Regional Consolidated Plan), that assessed the housing and community development needs of all incorporated cities and the unincorporated areas of the Ventura County. The County of Ventura served as the lead agency.
4. This was Oxnard’s first involvement with the Regional Consolidated Plan. Prior to the involvement in the Regional Consolidated Plan, the city conducted its own Consolidated Plans.
598
2 Consultant Selection
1. The current Regional Consolidated Plan expires June 30, 2025.
2. In preparation, the County of Ventura, serving as the lead agency, along with all incorporated cities and unincorporated areas of Ventura County, issued a joint Request for Proposal. They invited qualified organizations to submit proposals for the preparation of the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice.
3. Three (3) proposals were submitted from the following organizations: MDG Associates, Incorporated (MDG), TDA Consulting, Incorporated and Veronica Tam and Associates, Incorporated.
4. MDG was selected. MDG has over thirty-four (34) years of experience, providing consulting services to government agencies, with a focus on planning and administering programs funded by HUD.
3 599
Citizen Participation
1. MDG led robust community outreach (community meetings and surveys) in an effort to provide an opportunity for citizens, non-profit organizations and other stakeholders to help define priorities for addressing local community needs.
2. Sixty-two (62) Oxnard residents or stakeholders participated in the development of the Regional Consolidated Plan.
4 600
2025-2029 Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan
1. To develop the 2025-2029 Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan, qualitative and quantitative data was gathered through citizen and stakeholder participation, a market analysis, and an assessment of local data.
2. The plan put forth the following regional goals to meet high-priority needs:
Affordable
Housing Social Services Addressing Homelessness
Quality
Neighborhoods
Economic
Development
Effective
Administration
5 601
2025-2029 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
1. The 2025-2029 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) drew from much of the work that was completed as part for the 2021-2029 Housing Element.
2. As part of the state-mandated Housing Element, California jurisdictions must conduct a fair housing assessment that includes an analysis of fair housing issues, identify the factors that contribute to those issues and meaningful actions to affirmatively further fair housing.
3. The AI put forth numerous fair housing goals to address the four (4) fair housing issues identified in the plan. Listed below are some of the goals identified in the plan.
Affordable Housing in
high Resource Areas
Distribution of
Information
Resident
Engagement
Infrastructure
Improvements in
Areas of
Concentrated
Poverty
Development of
ADU’s
6 602
Community Development Grant
(CDBG)
FY 25-26 Estimated Amount
HUD CDBG Allocation (See
breakdown below)
$1,888,317
Program Income (Estimate) $100,000
Total CDBG Grant Resources $1,988,317
HUD CDBG Breakdown
Administration (20%) $397,663
Public Services (no more than 15%) $298,247
Public Improvements & Other Programs $1,292,407
Annual Action Plan – Entitlement Grants 11
HOME Investment Partnership
(HOME)
HOME Allocation $535,916
Program Income $150,000
Total HOME Grant Resources $685,916
Emergency Solutions Grant
(ESG)
ESG Allocation $175,122
Total ESG Grant Resources $175,122
Entitlements Grand Total $2,849,355
7 603
Public Services Program Name FY 25-26 Recommended
Amount
Oxnard Cultural & Community Services
Department Palm Vista Senior Center $30,000
Oxnard Cultural & Community Services
Department- Recreation Colonia Memorial Park Veterans Gym $20,000 Oxnard Cultural & Community Services
Department- Recreation Police Activities League- PAL $80,000 Oxnard Cultural & Community Services
Department- Recreation Southwinds Youth Center $30,505
Oxnard Housing Authority Senior Supportive Services $50,000 Shelter Care Resources Foundation First Basic Needs Assistance $35,000 The Coalition Resources Counseling Services for Survivors of Interpersonal Violence $25,000
Turning Point Foundation Our Place Safe Haven: Emergency Shelter & Multi-Service Navigation Ctr $27,742
Total Public Services Projects $298,247
Annual Action Plan - CDBG Budget
8 604
Public Improvements &
Other Programs
Program Name FY 25-26 Recommended
Amount
Oxnard Public Works Cal Gisler Neighborhood Street Resurfacing & ADA Improvement Project $1,000,000
Oxnard Housing Authority 201 S. D Street Apartments Rehabilitation $292,407 Total Public Improvements & Other
Programs $1,292,407
Annual Action Plan - CDBG Budget Continued
9 605
Emergency Solutions
Grant (ESG)
FY 25-26 Estimated Amount
HUD ESG Allocation (Estimate) $175,122
Total ESG Grant Resources $175,122
Annual Action Plan - ESG Budget 1
Recipient Dept/DIVOrganization
Program Name FY 25-26 Recommended
Amount
Oxnard Housing Department- Homeless
Division ESG Administration & Planning (7.5%) $13,134
Mercy House Rapid Re-Housing $68,730
United Way of Ventura County Rapid Re-Housing $40,000
Turning Point Foundation Our Place Safe Haven: Emergency Shelter
$53,258
Total ESG Grant Expenditures $175,122
10 606
Home Investment
Partnership (HOME)
FY 25-26 Estimated Amount
HUD HOME Allocation $535,916
Program Income $150,000
Total HOME Grant Resources $685,916
Annual Action Plan - HOME Budget
Recipient Dept/DIVOrganization
Program Name FY 25-26 Recommended
Amount
Oxnard Housing Department- Affordable
Housing & Rehabilitation Division
(AHRD)
HOME Administration & Planning
(10%) $68,591
Oxnard Housing Department-AHRD CHDO Set-Aside (15%) $80,387 Oxnard Housing Department- AHRD Affordable Housing Development Project
$536,938
Total HOME Grant Expenditures $685,916
11 607
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
1. Conduct a public hearing to receive comments from the public regarding the 2025-2029 Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan, the 2025-2029 Ventura County Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, and the 2025- 2026 Annual Action Plan to be submitted to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Community Planning and Development;
2. Approve the 2025-2029 Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan and the 2025-2029 Ventura County Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice;
3. Authorize the City Manager, or his designees, to incorporate any recommended changes resulting from public input to the Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan, the Ventura County Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, and 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan;
12 608
RECOMMENDATION (continued)
4. Approve the 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan and incorporate the final HUD allocations into the Plan and authorize the budget appropriations to fund the administration and activities in the Plan;
5. Authorize the City Manager, or his designees, to make any budgetary adjustments within ten percent, or $200,000, whichever is greater – per the Citizen Participation Plan of the proposed budget in the 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan that is approved by City Council; and,
6. Authorize the City Manager, or his designees, to execute HUD agreements and sign all agreements for the implementation of the Ventura County Regional Consolidated Plan, Ventura County Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, and Annual Action Plan including subrecipient, interdepartmental, and intradepartmental agreements.
13 609
End of Presentation
14 610
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM NO. M.2
DATE: May 6, 2025
TO: City Council
FROM: Jeff Pengilley, Community Development Director, (805) 385-8208, [email protected] SUBJECT: Appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to uphold the Director's decision to approve The Pointe Apartments project at 2801 N. Oxnard Blvd. (50 minutes).
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
1. Find the Project to be consistent with Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR No. 00-03) and subsequent addendums prepared for the RiverPark Specific Plan and therefore exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Sections 15162 through 15164 and 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines; and
2. Adopt a resolution denying the Appeal and upholding the Planning Commission’s decision to uphold the Community Development Director’s approval of Planning and Zoning Permit No. 23-200-01 (Development Design Review Permit), subject to certain findings and conditions.
Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video: https://youtu.be/Br0HmOn8XqE
BACKGROUND
The Pointe Apartments Project (PZ# 23-200-01, the “Project”) was submitted to the Planning Department in May 2023.
On December 17th, 2024, the Community Development Director (the “Director”) held a public hearing to consider the permit, which requested approval for a Development Design Review Permit (DDRP) for the construction of 280 residential units and a centrally located parking structure with 490 residential parking spaces on a 4.85-acre site. The project site is located on a vacant parcel at the intersection of N. Oxnard Boulevard and Town Center Drive.
This project was found to be in full conformance with the RiverPark Specific Plan (RPSP) and thus additional projectspecific environmental review was not required since it was adequately studied through the Specific Plan approval process. Additional information on the Specific Plan approval process and the associated Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is further detailed below in the “CEQA Background” section.
Staff presented the Project with a recommendation for approval at the director’s hearing (Attachment 1 of this report). At the public hearing, the Director heard public testimony, deliberated, and approved the Project pursuant to all of the Findings required to grant the DDRP, provided in the Community Development Director Resolution No. 23-200-01 (Attachment 1 of this report).
As part of the hearing record, two comment letters were submitted by the public, one in favor of and one against the Project. No comment was received by the Appellant prior to or during the hearing. The Appellant submitted their first comment letter after the Project was approved and followed that letter with the filing of a timely appeal on December 27th, 2024.
611
On February 6th, 2025, the project appeal went before the Planning Commission, in which the commission voted 4-0 (with three commissioners absent) to uphold the Director’s decision to find the Project consistent with the RiverPark Specific Plan EIR and approve the Project.
Pursuant to Section 16-525 of the Oxnard City Code (“OCC”), the action of the Planning Commission is final, unless an appeal application to the City Council is filed. Included with the submitted appeal form, the Appellant provided a letter dated January 31, 2025, with their Grounds of Appeal statements (Attachment 3). The Appellant in the letter claims that the Project is not compliant with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and that a project-specific environmental impact report must be completed.
CEQA Background
When the RiverPark Specific Plan (RPSP) was approved in the early 2000s, an Environmental Impact Report (FEIR No. 00-03) was prepared and certified. This certified EIR evaluated the full build out of the RPSP, and therefore, as stated in Section 1.3.3 of the RPSP, all projects developed within RiverPark that are in conformance with the RPSP do not require additional environmental review.
To date, the EIR for RiverPark has been updated with 15 addenda over the course of its existence as RiverPark has been built out and the Specific Plan has gone through various amendments. These addenda have continually updated the environmental information of the original EIR and have since become part of the original EIR to form a comprehensive environmental document for all development consistent with the current Specific Plan. This approach is consistent with the State’s CEQA Guidelines. All RiverPark environmental documents have been legally certified and approved, acting as the project level environmental review when a project is consistent with the Specific Plan, which is consistent with CEQA Guidelines. This approach is also outlined in Section 1.3.3 of the RPSP. Attachment E of Attachment 1 of this report provides links to the EIR and the subsequent addenda.
Through the creation of the RPSP, the subject property was originally zoned for commercial use, which would allow a large commercial development utilizing the square footage allotted within the Plan. In 2020, an amendment to the Specific Plan was submitted to the Community Development Department. This Specific Plan Amendment allowed designated parcels within RiverPark (including the subject parcel) that were originally zoned for commercial developments to instead develop with residential units. Since the original Environmental Impact Report studied commercial development on these parcels, the EIR was updated with an Addendum (Addendum No. 15) to address this change. This Addendum provided the necessary information to compare all potential areas of impact that must be looked at under CEQA, using the current environmental context, between the potential residential developments and the originally approved commercial development area. Studies conducted for the different areas of impact in the Addendum showed that the environmental impacts of switching to residential development on these specific parcels either maintained the same significance level or lessened the significance level of the environmental impacts. There were no new significant areas of environmental impact. This Specific Plan Amendment and Addendum No. 15 were approved by the Oxnard City Council on March 15, 2022, as recommended by the Planning Commission.
ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
The Appellant (“Richard Drury of Lozeau Drury, LLP,”), on behalf of Supporters of Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (“SAFER”), has appealed the decision of the Director primarily because the Appellant does not agree with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process used for the project. The issues raised in this letter are similar to the issues raised in prior letters which this group continually submits on various projects, three of which resulted in appeals, including the current project. The Appellant's initial ground of appeal as stated in the intro of their appeal letter dated January 31, 2025, is noted below, verbatim (Attachment 3). This is then followed by the staff response.
Initial Ground of Appeal: “SAFER objects to the City’s reliance on the almost quarter-century-old River Park Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2000051046), certified in 2002 (“RPSP EIR”) for the Project. Under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), project-level environmental review is required for this Project because it is inconsistent with the RPSP EIR, it is outside of the scope of the RPSP EIR, there are numerous changed circumstances since the adoption of the RPSP EIR over the twenty years ago, there are feasible mitigation measures that were not analyzed in the RPSP EIR, the project has significant offside and cumulative impacts that were not analyzed in the RPSP EIR, and the Project exceeds the density analyzed in the 612
RPSP EIR. Finally, the RPSP EIR left several impacts significant and unmitigated. These impacts must be analyzed at the project level to ensure adequate mitigation.” Staff Response:
The Appellant’s assertion that the City’s CEQA review is inadequate because the Project was not analyzed in the RiverPark Specific Plan EIR is entirely incorrect. This is primarily due to the fact that the Appellant fails to mention the addenda that have been prepared to update the EIR and which have fully become part of the EIR over the years, including the most recent addendum (Addendum No. 15) that studied the impacts of developing 280 residential units on the subject parcel. Since the Project is proposing 280 units on the parcel, it is therefore consistent with the updated EIR that incorporates this addendum. The Project, being in full conformance with the Specific Plan in all other aspects and requirements, further solidifies its standing as consistent with the EIR.
The Appellant is also claiming that the EIR is from over 20 years ago and does not contain feasible mitigation measures. They again fail to acknowledge the fact that the EIR has been updated with Addendum No. 15 as well as the other prior addenda. Addendum No. 15 directly evaluated the parcel in its current environmental context with updated studies. Within Addendum No. 15, existing mitigation measures from the EIR and its prior addenda were analyzed and determined to be adequate as the level of significance for all impact areas did not change, thus additional or updated mitigation measures were not required. The existing mitigation measures can be found in the conditions of approval, which are taken directly from the EIR and its addenda. All areas of impact have been studied in the current environmental context for a 280-unit residential development and the mitigation measures have been assessed. The EIR and its addenda directly and appropriately addresses this Project’s 280-unit development at this specific location within the RiverPark Specific Plan.
Contrary to the Appellant’s claim that the EIR is over 20 years old and is not applicable to this Project, the environmental impacts of this Project were recently studied through the 2022 certified addendum and thus a project level EIR is not required. It is entirely consistent with CEQA guidelines for the EIR and its Addendum to act as the project level EIR.
Ground of Appeal A: “Section 15162 and 15183 do not apply because the project is outside the scope of the RPSP EIR.”
Staff Response:
The Appellant’s multiple assertions on pages 3-10 of their letter that there are issues with the City using CEQA Guidelines §15162-15164 to prepare an addendum for the Specific Plan Amendment that is now covering the project and their other assertion that these CEQA Guidelines are not applicable is completely without merit.
Section 15162(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines states verbatim that “no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for a project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(a) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
(b) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
613
(c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.” The City prepared the addendum since the environmental studies performed for the Specific Plan Amendment showed no substantial changes had occurred in the environment for the studied parcels and no areas of impact were raised to a higher level of significance. The residential build-out option that the Specific Plan Amendment allowed for was shown to be less impactful overall than the commercial option that was already approved to be developed. The Appellant has not brought forth in their argument any significant evidence that shows this routinely mowed and maintained vacant parcel has substantially changed environmentally since the Addendum was certified in 2022 for this project. Notably, RiverPark is also an almost entirely built-out urban environment that is currently unable to support significant sensitive environmental areas, just as it was in 2022.
As mentioned in the previous response, the original mitigations will remain applicable to this project as well as the additional mitigation measures from the Addenda. These are already part of the project as they are contained within the conditions of approval (conditions 73-83) within the City Council Resolution (Attachment 4). The Director has determined that, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, that the Project was consistent with the RPSP and none of the triggers included in Section 15162(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines required the preparation of a subsequent EIR (or negative declaration), and conversely, sufficient evidence was provided to justify reliance on RPSP FEIR No. 00-03 and subsequent addenda relevant to the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as implemented by the City of Oxnard.
The appellant makes another assertion on page 9 of their comment letter that “Section 15162 does not mention addenda at all.” This is clearly incorrect. In Section 15162(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, it is written verbatim “If changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required under subdivision (a). Otherwise, the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation.” This clearly establishes the ability for a Lead Agency to utilize and prepare an addendum as the appropriate environmental document. With none of the items being triggered in §15162(a) and with §15162(b) providing the addendum as an appropriate option in this case, the City utilized the addendum as the appropriate environmental document.
It is important to note that the Addendum could have been challenged by anyone who felt the addendum was not an appropriate document for the Specific Plan Amendment, however, Addendum No. 15 was not challenged by anyone, including the Appellant during its 30-day challenge period. Addendum No. 15 was prepared in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines §15164. With the certified and approved Addendum being consistent with CEQA Sections 15162- 15164 as required by the CEQA Guidelines, it therefore acts as the environmental document for this project.
The Appellant also claims that §15183 does not apply, and the project errantly relies on its consistency with a previously adopted General Plan and a related EIR, however, they do not provide any specific evidence as to how the proposed project does not comply with the RiverPark Specific Plan and the 2030 General Plan. They assert the density does not match, however that is not true as they fail to mention the approved Specific Plan Amendment allowed for increased density that was offset by removing hundreds of thousands of square feet of commercial development that was already allowed to be developed prior to the Amendment. Table 1 below summarizes the changes made through the Specific Plan Amendment and shows the residential densities that Addendum No. 15 permitted (which are now allowed as the Specific Plan and Addendum are certified and approved). Note that the subject parcel is located within District C in Table 1 below:
614
The Planning Division evaluated the project for full consistency with the RPSP, including the density that the Specific Plan would allow for and conformance with its development standards. The Specific Plan allows for 280 units in the subject District that contains this parcel as noted above in the table under District C. The project proposal is for 280 units.
Additionally, the project proposal is consistent with the bedroom counts that were outlined with those 280 units and was found to comply with all other applicable development standards within the Specific Plan (Consistency Analysis, Attachment C of Attachment 1 of this report). Staff has also determined the project is consistent with the 2030 General Plan. The Director and the Planning Commission have upheld staff's determination that the project is fully consistent with the RPSP and the 2030 General Plan. With the project being in conformance with what the Specific Plan allows, it is therefore consistent with the EIR and Addenda that were all prepared in tandem with the approved RiverPark Specific Plan. This is what is outlined in Section 15183, therefore it is consistent with this CEQA Guidelines section.
Grounds of Appeal B-E:
• B. The project will have significant biological impacts not analyzed in the RPSP EIR, requiring subsequent CEQA review.
• C. The project will have significant air quality impacts not analyzed in the RPSP EIR, requiring subsequent CEQA review.
• D. The project will have significant traffic impacts not analyzed in the RPSP EIR, requiring subsequent CEQA review.
• E. The project will have significant noise and vibration impacts not analyzed in the RPSP EIR, requiring subsequent CEQA review.
Staff Response:
The Appellant claims the project was not analyzed for these four impact areas. These assertions are all entirely without merit. The Addendum, certified and approved in 2022 (Addendum No. 15), clearly evaluated all four of these areas of impact, some of which have extensive studies associated with them within the appendices. If the Appellant had issue with the studies that were part of the Addendum, or the mitigation measures, or the determinations of significance levels for the areas of impact, or any other aspect of the Addendum they disagreed with, they were obligated to challenge the addendum during its 30-day challenge period in 2022. As stated earlier, no one from the public, including the Appellant, challenged any aspect of the Addendum and its studies, nor did anyone challenge if an addendum was the appropriate environmental document. Therefore, the Addendum was validated as a suitable environmental document when it was certified and approved in 2022. The Addendum still stands as a suitable environmental document without any significant evidence that the regularly mowed and maintained parcel has substantially changed from an environmental perspective in the short amount of time since the certification of the Addendum.
Conclusion:
615
The Appellant requests the Planning Commission and the Director’s approvals of the Project to be overturned based on grounds that the reliance on the RPSP FEIR No. 00-03 and subsequent addenda was not adequate and that a project-level EIR should be prepared.
Staff’s responses in the“ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION” Analysis Section demonstrate the Appeal lacks merit and that the Appellant has not brought forth any substantial or significant information that shows additional environmental review is required. Therefore, the Planning Commission’s decision to uphold the Director’s original approval on December 17, 2024, should remain unchanged.
Staff recommends that the City Council find the proposed project is consistent with Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR No. 00-03) and subsequent addenda prepared for the RiverPark Specific Plan and therefore exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Sections 15162 through 15164 and 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines.
Furthermore, the City Council staff report, attachments, and the specific Findings outlined in the City Council resolution provide substantial evidence in the record for the City Council to approve the Project with the specific Findings outlined in the City Council Resolution (Attachment 4).
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item supports Economic Development strategy. The purpose of Economic Development strategy is to focus on the retention and expansion of Oxnard businesses by increasing the skills and employability of our local workforce, invite new business investments, and target site-based redevelopment opportunities.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The approval of the Permit provides the opportunity for future development. The Project will be required to pay the required connection and impact fees. When completed, the 280 apartment units will generate property taxes for the City.
COMMITTEE OUTCOME
This item did not originate in Committee as this item was reviewed by the Planning Commission on February 6, 2025.
The Planning Commission meeting can be viewed online at the following link: https: //youtu.be/pcBe5fIPM4M Prepared by: Daniel Houck, Associate Planner
ATTACHMENTS
1. Community Development Director Staff Report Dated 12.17.2024
2. Planning Commission Staff Report Packet Dated 2.6.2025 (W.o Attachment A)
3. Appeal Form with Grounds of Appeal Letter dated 1.31.2025
4. Draft City Council Resolution
5. City Council Staff Presentation
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
Updated Jan 7, 2019 - City of Oxnard Planning Division (805) 385-7858 214 S. C Street, Oxnard CA 93030 oxnard.org/planning
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Community Development Department
Use this form to request an appeal of a decision rendered on one of the following type of permits: Administrative Wireless Permit; Discretionary Development Permit decision rendered by the Development Services Director; or a Discretionary Development Permit decision rendered by the Planning Commission.
After paying the required appeal fee to the Planning Division, submit the original request for appeal and two (2) copies along with verification that the appropriate appeal fee has been paid to the City Clerk’s Office. To determine your appeal fee go to: oxnard.org/planning and click on planning handouts and applications or contact the Planning Division at (805) 385-7858.
I, , am requesting an appeal of a decision made by
________________________________________that was made on____________________________ regarding ____________________________________________________________________________.
Check one of the following:
Appeal of a Decision Rendered on a Wireless Permit. Pursuant to Section No. 16-488 (C) of the Oxnard City Code, I am submitting an appeal to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and I am paying the necessary fees to the Planning Division. I am filing this appeal within 10 days of the Planning Manager's decision on a wireless communications facility permit. I am requesting that this appeal be considered by the Planning Commission.
Appeal of a Decision Rendered on a Discretionary Permit - Development Services Director. Pursuant to Section No. 16-525 (B) of the Oxnard City Code, I am submitting an appeal to the City Clerk and I am paying the necessary fees to the Planning Division. I am filing this appeal within 10 days of the Development Services Director’s decision on a discretionary permit. I am requesting that this appeal be considered by the Planning Commission.
Appeal of a Decision Rendered on a Discretionary Permit - Planning Commission. Pursuant to Section 16-545/17-58(J) of the Oxnard City Code, I am submitting an appeal to the City Clerk and I am paying the necessary fees to the Planning Division. I am filing this appeal within 18 days / 10 working days of the Planning Commission’s decision on a discretionary permit. I am requesting that this appeal be considered by the City Council.
State the grounds, facts, and if known the code sections supporting your request: (Provide additional sheets if necessary)
X
cc: City Attorney
Director
Project Planner
Applicant
OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Received:
Received By:
Contacted Dept/Division Rep:
Appellant Signature Date
Print name
State decision making body Date
Specify PZ No.
Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility ("SAFER") City of Oxnard Planning Commission 2/6/2025
The Pointe Apartments Project (Planning and Zoning Permit No.23-200-01; Development Design Review Permit) X
The Planning Commission erred in claiming that the project is exempt from further environmental review by incorporating the project within the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") prepared for the River Park Specific Plan. The approval of the project on these grounds is improper and inconsistent with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA").
Further environmental review pursuant to CEQA must be completed for this specific project to be compliant with CEQA. 2/20/2025
812
January 31, 2025
VIA EMAIL
Oxnard Planning Commission
Ronald Arruejo, Chair
Vincent Stewart, Vice-Chair
Katherine Connelly, Commissioner
Miguel Lopez, Commissioner
Steve Nash, Commissioner
James Schuelke, Commissioner
Anna Zielsdorf, Commissioner
City of Oxnard
214 South C Street
Oxnard, CA 93030
[email protected]
Daniel Houck, Associate Planner
Community Development Department
City of Oxnard
214 South C Street
Oxnard, CA 93030
[email protected]
Rose Chaparro, City Clerk
City Clerk’s Office
City of Oxnard
300 West Third Street
Oxnard, CA 93030
[email protected]
Re: Comment on The Pointe Apartments (Planning and Zoning Permit No. 23-200-01), 2801 North Oxnard Blvd. (APN: 132-0-110-315) Planning Commission
Dear Chair Arruejo and Honorable Members of the Planning Commission:
I am writing on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (“SAFER”) and its members living, working, and recreating in and around the City of Oxnard (“City”) regarding the appeal of the Community Development Director’s December 17, 2024 decision to adopt Resolution 23-200-01, approving The Pointe Apartments Project (Planning and Zoning Permit No. 23-200-01) (“Project”) and finding the Project to be consistent with Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR No.00-03) and subsequent addenda prepared for the RiverPark Specific Plan. The Community Development Director found that no further environmental review was required under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15162-15164 and 15183. This appeal is scheduled to be heard at the Planning Commission’s February 6, 2025 meeting.
SAFER objects to the City’s reliance on the almost quarter-century old River Park Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2000051046), certified in 2002 (“RPSP EIR”), for the Project. Under CEQA, project-level environmental review is required for this Project because it is inconsistent with the RPSP EIR, it is outside 813
January 31, 2025
Comment on The Pointe Apartments Project