CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Wednesday, December 21, 2022, 6:00 P.M.
Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA The Council will not begin consideration of any item on this agenda later than 10:00 p.m. unless such consideration is approved. Any items on this agenda not considered this evening will be continued to a future meeting.
Copies of the agenda packet are available for review at the Pacific Grove Library, in the Finance Department, and electronically at www.cityofpacificgrove.org/agendas. The most effective method of communication with the City Council is by sending an email to [email protected]. In order to allow the City Council adequate time to review communication related to an agenda item, it is recommended that the communication be sent no later than 9:00 AM on the day prior to the City Council meeting.
THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON AND VIRTUALLY (HYBRID).
CHAMBER CAPACITY SEATING IS LIMITED AND PROVIDED ON A FIRST COME, FIRST SERVED BASIS.
THE VIRTUAL MEETING IS COMPLIANT WITH THE GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE
ORDERS ALLOWING FOR A DEVIATION OF
TELECONFERENCE RULES REQUIRED BY THE BROWN ACT.
JOIN THE ZOOM WEBINAR TO PARTICIPATE LIVE AT:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/209579290
To participate telephonically, call any number below:
888 788 0099 US (Toll-free)
877 853 5247 US (Toll-free)
669 900 9128
669 219 2599
Webinar ID: 209 579 290#
If prompted to enter a participant ID, press #.
Help Line 831-648-3128
MEETING INSTRUCTIONS
The public may also view the meeting on the Peninsula Channel 25.
AGENDA
PG CC 12/21/22
1 of 332
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
A. Remote Teleconference - AB 361 Action required by 11/2/2022 PG 7 Reference: Kerry Lindstrom, Deputy City Clerk
Recommended Action: Ratify Resolution No. 21-029 Emergency Teleconferencing authorizing remote teleconference meetings of all City legislative bodies for the following 30 days in accord with the Ralph M. Brown Act.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Councilmember Coletti
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
2. PRESENTATIONS
3. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (City-Related Items Only) A. Report on Closed Session by City Attorney
B. Other
4. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
General Public Comment must deal with matters subject to the jurisdiction of the City and the Council that are not on the Regular Agenda. This is the appropriate place to comment as to items on the Consent Agenda, only if you do not wish to have the item pulled for individual consideration by the Council.
Comments from the public will be limited to three minutes and will not receive Council action. Comments regarding items on the Regular Agenda shall be heard prior to Council’s consideration of such items at the time such items are called. Whenever possible, written correspondence should be submitted to the Council in advance of the meeting, to provide adequate time for its consideration.
CONSENT AGENDA
The Consent Agenda deals with routine and non-controversial matters, and may include action on resolutions, ordinances, or other public hearings for which testimony is not anticipated. The vote on the Consent Agenda shall apply to each item that has not been removed. Any member of Council, staff, or the public may remove an item from the Consent Agenda for individual consideration. When items are pulled for discussion, they will be automatically placed at the end of their respective section within the Regular Agenda. One motion shall be made to adopt all non-removed items on the Consent Agenda.
5. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
PG CC 12/21/22
2 of 332
5. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 12. Unfinished and Ongoing Business A. Minutes of the December 7, 2022 City Council Special and Regular Meetings PG 12 Reference: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk
Recommended Action: Approve minutes.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
6. RESOLUTIONS
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 12. Unfinished and Ongoing Business or 13. New Business
7. ORDINANCES
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 11. Public Hearings
8. REPORTS – INFORMATION ONLY
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 12. Unfinished and Ongoing Business or 13. New Business A. Check Register report - November 2022 PG 21
Reference: Audrey Cray, Finance & Risk Manager
Recommended Action: Receive the report.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Core Revenue Report for November 2022 PG 68
Reference: Audrey Cray, Finance & Risk Manager
Recommended Action: Receive the report.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
9. REPORTS – REQUIRING ACTION
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 12. Unfinished and Ongoing Business or 13. New Business A. Ratification of New Local Emergency Actions PG 71
Reference: Ben Harvey, City Manager
Recommended Action: Receive report of emergency directives/modifications.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
PG CC 12/21/22
3 of 332
B. Legal Services Agreement with Renee Public Law Group PG 73 Reference: Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney
Recommended Action: Motion to authorize the Mayor to sign a Legal Services Agreement with Renee Public Law Group.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
C. Agreement with Renee Public Management Group PG 79
Reference: Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney
Recommended Action: Motion to authorize the Mayor to sign Agreement with Renee Public Management Group.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
10. MEETING MINUTES OF COMMISSIONS, BOARDS, AND COMMITTEES Items pulled from this section will be placed under 13. New Business A. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Meeting Minutes: November 14, 2022 PG 84 Reference: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk/DEI Coordinator
Recommended Action: Receive the minutes.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes: September 1, 2022 PG 87 Reference: Joseph Sidor, Contract Planner
Recommended Action: Receive the minutes.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
REGULAR AGENDA
11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
For public hearings involving a quasi-judicial determination by the Council, the proponent of an item may be given 10 minutes to speak and others in support of the proponent’s position may be given three minutes each. A designated spokesperson for opposition to the item may be given 10 minutes to speak and all others in opposition may be given three minutes each. Very brief rebuttal and surrebuttal may be allowed in the sole discretion of the Council. In public hearings not involving a quasi-judicial determination by the Council, all persons may be given three minutes to speak on the matter. Public hearings on non-controversial matters or for which testimony is not anticipated may be placed on the Consent Agenda, but shall be removed if any person requests a staff presentation or wishes to be heard on the matter.
12. UNFINISHED AND ONGOING BUSINESS
PG CC 12/21/22
4 of 332
A. Coastal Wildlife Protection Subcommittee Recommendations PG 90 Reference: Joe Amelio, Councilmember and Luke Coletti, Councilmember Recommended Action:
Direct Staff to return to City Council with a Request for Qualifications for consultant services to assist with the proposed Local Coastal Program amendments and corrections.
1. Direct Staff to return to City Council with a comprehensive report describing the use of Community Service Officers to provide wildlife protection and code enforcement services throughout the entire city.
2. Direct the Beautification and Natural Resources Commission to form a standing Wildlife Subcommittee that will provide guidance and oversight regarding wildlife protection issues and code enforcement efforts throughout the entire city.
3. CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Parklet Program PG 220
Reference: Laurel O'Halloran, Planner & Economic Development Coordinator Recommended Action:
1. Receive recommendations from Traffic Safety and Planning Commissions.
2. Receive Proposed Draft Parklet Program Manual and provide feedback.
Provide direction to City staff to move forward with a program based on Title 15, Encroachment Permits, and Director of Public Works approval.
3. CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
13. NEW BUSINESS
A. 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe Police Vehicle Purchase PG 321
Reference: Jocelyn Francis, Police Administrative Services Manager Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to award a purchase order with Premier Chevrolet of Seaside for the purchase of (1) 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe Police Vehicle in an amount not-to-exceed $76,500.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
14. FULL PRESENTATIONS
15. CLOSED SESSION
ADJOURNMENT
PG CC 12/21/22
5 of 332
NOTICE OF ADA COMPLIANCE: Pursuant to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (Codified At 42 United States Code Section 12101 and 28 Code of Federal Regulations Part 35), and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the City of Pacific Grove does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, disability, age or sexual orientation in the provision of any services, programs, or activities. The City of Pacific Grove does not discriminate against persons with disabilities. City Hall is an accessible facility. A limited number of assisted listening devices will be available at this meeting. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting or provide the requested agenda format.
PG CC 12/21/22
6 of 332
Agenda No. A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Kerry Lindstrom, Deputy City Clerk
MEETING DATE: December 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Remote Teleconference - AB 361 Action required by 11/2/2022 CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Ratify Resolution No. 21-029 Emergency Teleconferencing authorizing remote teleconference meetings of all City legislative bodies for the following 30 days in accord with the Ralph M. Brown Act.
DISCUSSION
Governor Newsom signed AB 361 into law on September 16, 2021 to become effective on October 1, 2021. AB 361 extends the provisions of the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20 and Executive Order N-35-20 and is effective until January 1, 2024. AB 361 amends sections of the Brown Act to allow legislative bodies to continue to hold teleconference meetings during a state of emergency if the legislative body finds that as a result of the proclaimed state of emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.
Assembly Bill 361 requires the City within 30 days of holding a virtual meeting for the first time, and every 30 days thereafter, to make findings ratifying the state of emergency.
The exact language of the Bill is as follows:
If a state of emergency remains active, or state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, in order to continue to teleconference without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b), the legislative body shall, not later than 30 days after teleconferencing for the first time pursuant to subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1), and every 30 days thereafter, make the following findings by majority vote:
(A) The legislative body has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency. (B) Any of the following circumstances exist:
(i) The state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person.
(ii) State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing.
At its October 6, 2021 meeting, Council approved Resolution No. 21-029 Proclaiming a Local Emergency, Ratifying the State of Emergency Proclaimed on March 4, 2020, and Authorizing Remote PG CC 12/21/22
7 of 332
Teleconference Meetings of All City Legislative Bodies for the Following 30 days in Accord wth the Ralph M. Brown Act. Resolution No. 21-029 has effect for only 30 days. The Council has ratified that resolution each month since and must now renew the effect of the resolution by ratifying it again or adopting another.
This item will be added to the Council's first meeting of the month as the first item of business.
OPTIONS
Take no action and resume in person meetings.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact.
GOAL ALIGNMENT: Transparency, Accountability and Communication: Implement programs, processes, revisions, and training to improve and advance the City's efforts.
Attachments
Reso 21-029
PG CC 12/21/22
8 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
9 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
10 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
11 of 332
Agenda No. 5 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk/DEI Coordinator
MEETING DATE: December 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Minutes of the December 7, 2022 City Council Special and Regular Meetings CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Approve minutes.
Attachments
Draft Minutes
PG CC 12/21/22
12 of 332
1 DRAFT MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, December 7, 2022, 6:00 P.M.
Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON AND VIRTUALLY (HYBRID).
CHAMBER CAPACITY SEATING IS LIMITED AND PROVIDED ON A
FIRST COME, FIRST SERVED BASIS.
THE VIRTUAL MEETING IS COMPLIANT WITH THE GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE
ORDERS ALLOWING FOR A DEVIATION OF
TELECONFERENCE RULES REQUIRED BY THE BROWN ACT.
JOIN THE ZOOM WEBINAR TO PARTICIPATE LIVE AT:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/209579290
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Peake called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. City Clerk Kandell conducted roll call with the following Council present in Chamber: Mayor Peake, Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Councilmembers Coletti, McAdams, Poduri, Smith, and Tomlinson.
A. Remote Teleconference - AB 361 Action required by 11/2/2022 No public comment was received.
Action: Upon motion by Mayor Pro Tem Amelio and seconded by Councilmember Smith, Council voted to ratify Resolution No. 21-029 Emergency Teleconferencing authorizing remote teleconference meetings of all City legislative bodies for the following 30 days in accord with the Ralph M. Brown Act.
Motion carried 7-0, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Peake, Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Councilmembers Coletti, McAdams, Poduri, Smith, and Tomlinson.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Pro Tem Amelio led the pledge of allegiance.
PG CC 12/21/22
13 of 332
2 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Smith and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, the Council voted to approve the agenda.
Motion carried 7-0, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Peake, Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Councilmembers Coletti, McAdams, Poduri, Smith, and Tomlinson.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
2. CERTIFICATION OF RESULTS / OATHS OF OFFICE / PRESENTATIONS A. Declaring Results of the November 8, 2022 General Election No public comment was received.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Smith and seconded by Councilmember McAdams, the Council voted to approve Resolution No. 22-052 declaring the results of the November 8, 2022, General Election.
Motion carried 7-0, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Peake, Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Councilmembers Coletti, McAdams, Poduri, Smith, and Tomlinson.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Oaths of Office for Elected Officials At the request of the Mayor, this item was heard after 2C Certificates of Appreciation.
No public comment was received.
Action: No Council action required. Oaths were administered by the Deputy City Clerk to our elected Mayor and Council Members.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
C. Certificates of Appreciation At the request of the Mayor, this item was heard prior to 2B Oaths of Office for Elected Officials.
Public comment was received from Mark Chakwin, Andrew Gonzalez, Nadja Mark, and Darla Vining.
Action: Outgoing Council Members McAdams and Tomlinson received certificates.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
PG CC 12/21/22
14 of 332
3 3. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS / PUBLIC PARTICIPATION / COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (City-Related Items Only)
4. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
General public comment was received from Nancy Parsons, Peggy Gibbs, Vince Tuminello, Mike Gibbs, and Kim Akeman.
A. Public Comment
Action: Received public comment, if applicable.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
CONSENT AGENDA
Action: Consent Agenda item 9B was pulled and heard as Regular Agenda item 12A. Consent Agenda item 9C was pulled and heard as Regular Agenda item 13G.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Smith and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Council voted to approve the Consent Agenda as amended.
Motion carried 7-0, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Peake, Councilmembers Amelio, Beck, Coletti, McDonnell, Poduri, and Smith.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
5. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
A. Minutes of the November 16, 2022 City Council Special and Regular Meetings Action: Approved minutes.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
6. RESOLUTIONS
A. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacific Grove Supporting the Blue Zones Project Monterey County
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 22-053 supporting the Blue Zones Project Monterey County.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacific Grove in Support of Net Energy Metering
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 22-054 in support of Net Energy Metering and transmit copies to Governor Gavin Newsom, State Senator Nancy Skinner, Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, and members of the California Public Utilities Commission Board (CPUC).
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
PG CC 12/21/22
15 of 332
4 7. ORDINANCES
A. Second Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the Salary Schedule (Minimum Wage) Action: Held second reading and adopted Ordinance No. 22-020 amending the salary classification schedule, modifying the salary range for Cashier, Intern, Lighthouse Docent Coordinator, Recreation Assistant I, Recreation Assistant II and Recreation Supervisor; and approving the amendment.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Second Reading of an Ordinance Amending the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Operating and Capital Improvement Budget
Action: Held second reading and adopted Ordinance No. 22-021 Amending the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Operating and Capital Improvement Budget
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
8. REPORTS – INFORMATION ONLY
A. Governor Newsom's Executive Order N-16-22
Action: Received the DEI November 8, 2022 Agenda Report with Governor Newsom's Executive Order N-16-22 Attachment
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Monterey-Salinas Transmit Meeting Minutes of October 17, 2022 Action: Received minutes.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
9. REPORTS – REQUIRING ACTION
A. Ratification of New Local Emergency Actions
Action: Received report of emergency directives/modifications.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Proposed Schedule of City Council Meetings for 2023 and 2024 This item was pulled and considered as Regular Agenda 12A.
Reference: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk/DEI Coordinator
Recommended Action: Adopt the proposed schedule of City Council Meetings for 2023 and 2024.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
C. Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History Roof Repair Project This item was pulled and considered as Regular Agenda item 13G.
Reference: Joyce Halabi, Deputy Public Works Director
Recommended Action: Authorize an agreement with Scudder Roofing for the Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History Roof Repair Project in an amount not to exceed PG CC 12/21/22
16 of 332
5 $49,285 plus a 20% contingency.
CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class I, Existing Facilities
D. Appointments to Regional Agencies and Liaisons
Action: Approved appointments to regional boards and endorsed liaisons effective immediately.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
10. MEETING MINUTES OF COMMISSIONS, BOARDS, AND COMMITTEES A. Beautification and Natural Resources Commission Minutes: August 16, 2022 and September 20, 2022
Action: Received minutes.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Minutes: October 22, 2022 Action: Received minutes.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
REGULAR AGENDA
11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
12. UNFINISHED AND ONGOING BUSINESS
A. Proposed Schedule of City Council Meetings for 2023 and 2024 This item was pulled from the Consent Agenda.
No public comment was received.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Smith and seconded by Councilmember Coletti, Council adopted the proposed schedule of City Council Meetings for 2023 and 2024 adding a Goal Setting Session for January 25, 2023 at 6:00 p.m. and a Budget Workshop for March 8, 2023 at 6:00 p.m.
Motion carried 7-0, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Peake, Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Councilmembers Beck, Coletti, McDonnell, Poduri, and Smith.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
13. NEW BUSINESS
A. Mayor Pro Tempore
Public comment was received from Sally Moore and Inge Lorentzen Daumer.
PG CC 12/21/22
17 of 332
6 Action: Select a Mayor Pro Tempore in accordance with the Charter through nominations from City Council.
Action: Mayor Peake nominated Councilmember Smith.
Action: No further nominations were made, and the nomination period was closed.
Action: Upon motion by Mayor Pro Tem Amelio and seconded by Mayor Peake, Council voted to approve Councilmember Smith as Mayor Pro Tem for a two year term.
Motion carried 7-0, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Peake, Councilmembers Amelio, Beck, Coletti, McDonnell, Poduri, and Smith.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Mayor Pro Tempore Role and Appointment
Public comment was received from Inge Lorentzen Daumer.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Poduri and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Smith, Council voted to direct the City Attorney to return with a draft ordinance to amend Chapter 2.05 of the Pacific Grove Municipal Code codifying the role and appointment of the Mayor pro tempore.
Motion carried 7-0, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Peake, Mayor Pro Tem Smith, Councilmembers Amelio, Beck, Coletti, McDonnell, and Poduri.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
C. Presentation of the Council Goals and Tactics Section of the City's New Transparency Software
Public comment was received from Andrew Kubica.
Action: Council received the presentation.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
PG CC 12/21/22
18 of 332
7 D. Council Goals 2023-2024
No public comment was received.
Action: Due to lack of a motion, no action was taken to appoint a subcommittee to draft Council goals for 2023-2024.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
E. Small Business Recovery Action Plan
Public comment was received from Mike Gibbs, Vince Tuminello, and Andrew Kubica.
Action: Council received the report and provided the Economic Development Commission with feedback regarding the report's recommendations.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
F. Cannabis Retail License
Public comment was received from Mike Gibbs, Kelly, Vince Tuminello, Inge Lorentzen Daumer, and Darla Vining.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Coletti and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Smith, Council voted to direct the City Manager and City Attorney to create a cannabis license program to authorize one cannabis retail license under the following conditions:
1. Location may be determined following award of license and subject to restrictions described in Nov. 8 general election Measure M.
2. Objective license conditions.
Motion carried 7-0, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Peake, Mayor Pro Tem Smith, Councilmembers Amelio, Beck, Coletti, McDonnell, and Poduri.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
G. Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History Roof Repair Project This item was pulled from the Consent Agenda.
Public comment was taken from Andrew Kubica.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Amelio and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Smith, Council voted to authorize an agreement with Scudder Roofing for the Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History Roof Repair Project in an amount not to exceed $49,285 plus a 20% contingency.
Motion carried 7-0, by the following roll call vote:
PG CC 12/21/22
19 of 332
8 AYES: Mayor Peake, Mayor Pro Tem Smith, Councilmembers Amelio, Beck, Coletti, McDonnell, and Poduri.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class I, Existing Facilities
14. FULL PRESENTATIONS
15. CLOSED SESSION
A. Public Employment, (Government Code § 54957)
Title: City Manager Performance Evaluation
No public comment was received.
Action: Received report and will report out, if any, during the next regular meeting.
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
ADJOURNMENT
Council paused the regular meeting at 9:34 p.m. to commence Closed Session agenda item 15A.
Closed Session adjourned at 10:45 p.m. A report out, if any, will occur at the next regular meeting.
Respectfully Submitted,
Sandra Kandell
City Clerk
Approved by Mayor: _______________________________Date________________ Attest by City Manager: ____________________________Date_________________ PG CC 12/21/22
20 of 332
Agenda No. 8 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Audrey Cray, Finance & Risk Manager
MEETING DATE: December 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Check Register report - November 2022
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Receive the report.
DISCUSSION
The check register is a detailed account of monthly expenditures. It provides budgetary insight and promotes transparency. It is an excellent counterpart to the City's monthly Core Revenue Report; and is a practice followed by many other local jurisdictions.
The check register is produced from the City’s financial system. The report groups the checks by the respective city fund and vendor. The check register includes the check number, the check issue date, the name of the vendor, and a description of the purchase and the amount of the check.
Attached is the check register report for November 2022.
The monthly total is provided on the last page of the report.
OPTIONS
N/A - This is an informational report only.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact. This is informational only.
GOAL ALIGNMENT: Financial Stability: Develop a strategic plan to better address current and future City expenditure and revenue needs.
Attachments
Check Register - November 2022
PG CC 12/21/22
21 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104241 11/04/22 2952 AFLAC 01 202 DED:5291 AFLAC P/T 0.00 69.24101 104241 11/04/22 2952 AFLAC 01 202 DED:5200 AFLAC PREM 0.00 678.09101 104241 11/04/22 2952 AFLAC 01 202 DED:5201 AFLAC P/T 0.00 1,709.54TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2,456.87101 104242 11/04/22 2935 CALIF LAW ENFORCMEN 01 202 DED:3200 LTD PD 0.00 567.00101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:531 HEALTH 0.00 350.62101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:2074 HEALTH 0.00 911.50101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:118 HEALTH 0.00 911.60101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:109 HEALTH 0.00 1,015.82101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:120 HEALTH 0.00 1,015.82101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:1 HEALTH 0.00 1,057.01101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:2225 HEALTH INS 0.00 1,057.01101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:0563 HEALTH FAM 0.00 1,114.18101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:2072 HEALTH 0.00 1,725.00101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:110 HEALTH 0.00 2,031.62101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:2071 HEALTH 0.00 2,397.00101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:103 HEALTH 0.00 2,454.34101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:105 HEALTH 0.00 2,734.80101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:102 HEALTH 0.00 2,748.24101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:533 HEALTH 0.00 3,646.40101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:106 HEALTH 0.00 3,699.57101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:2073 HEALTH FAM 0.00 4,438.00101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:104 HEALTH 0.00 6,311.07101 104243 11/04/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:100 HEALTH 0.00 6,342.12TOTAL CHECK 0.00 45,961.72101 104244 11/04/22 3134 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:3300 AFLAC DEP 0.00 348.00101 104244 11/04/22 3134 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:3301 AFLAC MED 0.00 2,241.48TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2,589.48101 104245 11/04/22 3393 EFT 01 202 DED:*FM MEDICARE 0.00 10,678.54101 104245 11/04/22 3393 EFT 01 202 DED:*SCA STATE TAX 0.00 16,826.18101 104245 11/04/22 3393 EFT 01 202 DED:*FT FEDERAL TX 0.00 45,374.71TOTAL CHECK 0.00 72,879.43101 104246 11/04/22 9589 FOREMAN FINANCIAL, 01 202 DED:7506 WAGE ORDER 0.00 555.29101 104247 11/04/22 3404 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 01 202 DED:7502 WAGE GARN 0.00 100.00101 104248 11/04/22 2946 PACIFIC GROVE CITY 01 202 DED:7000 ASSOC DUES 0.00 760.00101 104249 11/04/22 2938 MASS MUTUAL (457 PL 01 202 DED:3999 ROTH IRA 0.00 765.00101 104249 11/04/22 2938 MASS MUTUAL (457 PL 01 202 DED:4000 DEF COMP 0.00 9,543.57TOTAL CHECK 0.00 10,308.57101 104250 11/04/22 2936 MTRY COUNTY DEPT OF 01 202 DED:0023 GARNISH 0.00 236.30101 104251 11/04/22 2949 PACIFIC GROVE MANAG 01 202 DED:7203 ASSOC DUES 0.00 30.00101 104252 11/04/22 2051 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:1006 WORK COMP 0.00 19.97 PG CC 12/21/22
22 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 2
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104252 11/04/22 2051 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:1009 WORK COMP 0.00 61.80101 104252 11/04/22 2051 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:1005 WORK COMP 0.00 1,324.43101 104252 11/04/22 2051 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:1010 WORK COMP 0.00 3,012.51101 104252 11/04/22 2051 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:1003 WORK COMP 0.00 6,454.63TOTAL CHECK 0.00 10,873.34101 104253 11/04/22 2052 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:7510 PERS REIMB 0.00 44.13101 104254 11/04/22 2053 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:2101 DENTAL 0.00 132.65101 104254 11/04/22 2053 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:201 DENTAL 0.00 187.95101 104254 11/04/22 2053 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:202 DENTAL 0.00 189.64101 104254 11/04/22 2053 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:2102 DENTAL 0.00 375.90101 104254 11/04/22 2053 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:200 DENTAL 0.00 568.50101 104254 11/04/22 2053 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:2103 DENTAL FAM 0.00 616.33TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2,070.97101 104255 11/04/22 2054 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:0005 SUTA 0.00 132.70101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0000 PERS 0.00 −874.22101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0019 PERS RT SF 0.00 −3.25101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0025 PERS RT MS 0.00 13.01101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0004 SURV BEN 0.00 87.42101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0022 PERS SP MS 0.00 98.51101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:08 PERS OTHER 0.00 396.79101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0018 PERS SP SF 0.00 486.23101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0009 PERS OTHER 0.00 806.56101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:2001 PERS 0.00 880.32101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:2000 PERS EMPLY 0.00 1,179.00101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0002 PERS 0.00 5,670.87101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:07 PERS CITY 0.00 5,784.56101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0017 PERS RG SF 0.00 5,962.65101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0011 PERS ER SF 0.00 6,336.53101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0021 PERS REG M 0.00 8,389.92101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0020 PERS ER M3 0.00 9,408.27101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0006 PERS CITY 0.00 11,200.61101 104256 11/04/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:01 PERS 0.00 11,428.49TOTAL CHECK 0.00 67,252.27101 104257 11/04/22 2943 POLICE OFFICERS ASS 01 202 DED:7204 ASSOC DUES 0.00 7.00101 104257 11/04/22 2943 POLICE OFFICERS ASS 01 202 DED:7205 ASSOC DUES 0.00 931.24TOTAL CHECK 0.00 938.24101 104258 11/04/22 2940 LEGAL SHIELD 01 202 DED:6100 LEGAL SVC 0.00 14.95101 104259 11/04/22 7956 STATE DISABILITY TA 01 202 DED:0026 SDI 0.00 4,056.81101 104260 11/04/22 8211 STANDARD INSURANCE 01 202 DED:3500 LIFE INS 0.00 1,401.75101 104261 11/04/22 8352 TRANSAMERICA EMPLOY 01 202 DED:5202 TRANSAMERI 0.00 627.08101 104262 11/04/22 4177 UNION BANK OF CALIF 01 202 DED:4005 PARS−457 0.00 528.38 PG CC 12/21/22
23 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 3
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104263 11/04/22 632 VISION SERVICE PLAN 01 202 DED:2502 VISION 0.00 41.88101 104263 11/04/22 632 VISION SERVICE PLAN 01 202 DED:302 VISION 0.00 60.00101 104263 11/04/22 632 VISION SERVICE PLAN 01 202 DED:301 VISION 0.00 135.00101 104263 11/04/22 632 VISION SERVICE PLAN 01 202 DED:300 VISION 0.00 216.38101 104263 11/04/22 632 VISION SERVICE PLAN 01 202 DED:2503 VISION FAM 0.00 270.01TOTAL CHECK 0.00 723.27101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 131 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 11,500.00101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 401 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 11,583.33101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 201 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 13,833.33101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 505 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 18,583.33101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 351 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 99,750.00101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 301 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 118,603.25101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 513 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 250.00101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 101 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 500.00101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 133 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 2,583.33101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 502 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 2,916.67101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 501 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 3,583.33101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 421 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 5,416.67101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 121 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 10,000.00101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 503 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 10,166.67TOTAL CHECK 0.00 309,269.91101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 501 5222 FOREST 40 FT E/O LH 0.00 297.25101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 117 COMMUNITY CTR 0.00 324.01101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 503 5802 SUNSET SR. − LOAN 0.00 338.81101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 351 5222 FIRE DEPARTMENT − 2 0.00 494.66101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 401 5222 550 CENTRAL AVE 0.00 641.88101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 301 5222 POLICE DEPARTMENT − 0.00 886.26101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 301 5802 580 PINE AVE − LOAN 0.00 1,046.81101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 401 5222 PUBLIC LIBRARY 0.00 1,088.44101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 301 5222 580 PINE AVE 0.00 1,420.11101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 351 5222 FIRE DEPT 0.00 153.17101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 301 5222 POLICE DEPT 0.00 155.61101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 501 5222 FOREST 40 FT E/O LH 0.00 186.68101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 201 5222 CEDD − 9.5% 0.00 195.80101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 121 5222 CITY MANAGER − 9.5% 0.00 195.80101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 17 MI DR BALLPARK 0.00 226.03101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 17TH ST & LAUREL 0.00 261.81101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 131 5222 FINANCE − 7% 0.00 144.28101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 17 MILE DRIVE 0.00 148.60101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 CALEDONIA PK LIGHTS 0.00 −68.40101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 FOREST CENTRL SPR 0.00 −68.24101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 168 16TH ST 0.00 −62.97101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 117 RECREATION ROOM 0.00 −60.27101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 503 5222 LOVERS POINT 0.00 −57.96101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 503 5222 PLATT PK SPRNKLR 0.00 −56.49101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 BEACH BOAT STORAGE 0.00 −49.83101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 503 5222 PHONE BOOTH−BERWICK 0.00 −38.47101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 CONCESSION STAND 0.00 −19.84101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 CALEDONIA ST 0.00 0.01101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 FOREST CENTRL SPR 0.00 0.10 PG CC 12/21/22
24 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 4
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 168 16TH ST 0.00 2.58101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 117 RECREATION ROOM 0.00 4.03101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 201 5222 101 CITY HALL/CEDD 0.00 4.05101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 131 5222 101 CITY HALL/FIN − 0.00 4.06101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 503 5222 LOVERS POINT 0.00 5.03101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 503 5222 PLATT PK SPRNKLR 0.00 6.00101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 17 MI DR BALLPARK 0.00 8.11101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 300 16TH ST. 0.00 8.52101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 501 5222 1307 FORST PINE SIG 0.00 14.83101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 501 5222 CORP YARD SUNSET DR 0.00 15.05101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 503 5222 BERWICK PARK AT 0.00 15.20101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 503 5222 PARKING LOT LIGHT 0.00 15.77101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 501 5222 1307 FORST SINEX SI 0.00 16.13101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 501 5222 CORP YARD DM & 5TH 0.00 17.37101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 401 5222 PUBLIC LIBRARY 0.00 18.43101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 OCEANVIEW & 17TH 0.00 9.99101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 411 5222 165 FOREST AVE 0.00 23.02101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 GRAND AV & PK PL 0.00 23.73101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 PIEDMONT & MORELAND 0.00 25.48101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 620 OCEAN VIEW POOL 0.00 32.08101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 101 5222 CITY COUNCIL − 3% 0.00 61.83101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 RECREATION − 3% 0.00 61.83101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 17TH ST & LAUREL 0.00 67.26101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 131 5222 300 FOREST AVE 0.00 71.51101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 162 16TH STREET 0.00 79.38101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 CHAUTAUQUA HALL 0.00 80.27101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 CHAUTAUQUA HALL 0.00 81.46101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 117 COMMUNITY CTR 0.00 97.62101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 501 5222 1307 FORST PINE SIG 0.00 44.97101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 501 5222 1307 FORST SINEX SI 0.00 47.08101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 117 COMMUNITY CTR 0.00 125.14101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 411 5222 FOREST & CENTRAL DR 0.00 130.37TOTAL CHECK 0.00 8,941.83101 104267 11/10/22 8330 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 501 5309 SIGNS FOR GATE 0.00 42.57101 104267 11/10/22 8330 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 505 5309 STREET LIGHTS 0.00 53.15TOTAL CHECK 0.00 95.72101 104268 11/10/22 106 AMERICAN SUPPLY COM 503 5305 CLEANING SUPPLIES 0.00 119.45101 104268 11/10/22 106 AMERICAN SUPPLY COM 503 5305 CLEANING SUPPLIES 0.00 606.61101 104268 11/10/22 106 AMERICAN SUPPLY COM 503 5305 CLEANING SUPPLIES 0.00 1,965.71101 104268 11/10/22 106 AMERICAN SUPPLY COM 503 5305 CLEANING SUPPLIES 0.00 211.90TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2,903.67101 104269 11/10/22 9430 ARAMARK UNIFORM & C 301 5201 DEPARTMENT LINEN AN 0.00 114.85101 104270 11/10/22 213 BAKER & TAYLOR COMP 401 5301 BOOKS & MATERIALS 0.00 5.28101 104270 11/10/22 213 BAKER & TAYLOR COMP 401 5301 BOOKS & MATERIALS 0.00 11.12101 104270 11/10/22 213 BAKER & TAYLOR COMP 401 5301 BOOKS & MATERIALS 0.00 22.37101 104270 11/10/22 213 BAKER & TAYLOR COMP 401 5303 BOOKS & MATERIALS 0.00 73.36101 104270 11/10/22 213 BAKER & TAYLOR COMP 401 5303 BOOKS & MATERIALS 0.00 161.19101 104270 11/10/22 213 BAKER & TAYLOR COMP 401 5301 BOOKS & MATERIALS 0.00 242.57 PG CC 12/21/22
25 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 5
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104270 11/10/22 213 BAKER & TAYLOR COMP 401 5303 BOOKS & MATERIALS 0.00 353.16101 104270 11/10/22 213 BAKER & TAYLOR COMP 401 5303 BOOKS & MATERIALS 0.00 3,209.17TOTAL CHECK 0.00 4,078.22101 104271 11/10/22 230 BARRY’S CARPET SERV 401 5223 CARPET CLEANING 0.00 4,850.00101 104272 11/10/22 9716 WHITSON JANITORIAL 503 5201 FY22/23 JANITORIAL 0.00 2,100.00101 104273 11/10/22 5303 VERIZON BUSINESS 301 5206 VERIZON PORT ACCESS 0.00 178.45101 104274 11/10/22 1040 CENGAGE LEARNING/GA 401 5303 BOOKS & MATERIALS 0.00 26.22101 104274 11/10/22 1040 CENGAGE LEARNING/GA 401 5303 BOOKS & MATERIALS 0.00 66.40101 104274 11/10/22 1040 CENGAGE LEARNING/GA 401 5303 BOOKS & MATERIALS 0.00 161.64TOTAL CHECK 0.00 254.26101 104275 11/10/22 4467 WM.J. CLARK TRUCKIN 505 5309 DG BASE 0.00 1,145.84101 104275 11/10/22 4467 WM.J. CLARK TRUCKIN 505 5309 DG BASE 0.00 1,186.92101 104275 11/10/22 4467 WM.J. CLARK TRUCKIN 505 5309 DG BASE 0.00 2,289.88TOTAL CHECK 0.00 4,622.64101 104276 11/10/22 8737 COYOTE VALLEY NURSE 503 5223 PERKINS PARK ICE PL 0.00 726.51101 104278 11/10/22 3451 DE LAY & LAREDO 121 5205 LEGAL SERVICES 0.00 3,203.20101 104279 11/10/22 926 EWING IRRIGATION PR 503 5223 PERKINS IRRIGATION 0.00 263.11101 104280 11/10/22 952 FEDERAL EXPRESS COR 301 5211 SHIPPING 0.00 74.70101 104281 11/10/22 6342 FIELD OF DREAMS DES 501 5291 PUBLIC WORKS HATS 0.00 1,065.19101 104282 11/10/22 592 FOREST HILL ACE HAR 503 5223 PERKINS PARK 0.00 46.40101 104283 11/10/22 1199 HAYWARD LUMBER COMP 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 20.76101 104283 11/10/22 1199 HAYWARD LUMBER COMP 401 5223 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 0.00 26.65101 104283 11/10/22 1199 HAYWARD LUMBER COMP 401 5223 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 0.00 36.92101 104283 11/10/22 1199 HAYWARD LUMBER COMP 501 5309 PW ADMIN SUPPLIES 0.00 38.22101 104283 11/10/22 1199 HAYWARD LUMBER COMP 401 5223 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 0.00 52.99101 104283 11/10/22 1199 HAYWARD LUMBER COMP 505 5309 STREETS SUPPLIES 0.00 54.39101 104283 11/10/22 1199 HAYWARD LUMBER COMP 505 5309 STREETS SUPPLIES 0.00 949.39101 104283 11/10/22 1199 HAYWARD LUMBER COMP 505 5309 STREETS 0.00 1,709.52101 104283 11/10/22 1199 HAYWARD LUMBER COMP 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 214.42TOTAL CHECK 0.00 3,103.26101 104284 11/10/22 4321 HOME DEPOT CREDIT S 505 5309 FILTER 0.00 28.24101 104284 11/10/22 4321 HOME DEPOT CREDIT S 505 5309 STREET SUPPLIES 0.00 338.15TOTAL CHECK 0.00 366.39101 104285 11/10/22 1266 HOWARD’S UPHOLSTERY 505 5227 UNIT 12 0.00 975.07101 104285 11/10/22 1266 HOWARD’S UPHOLSTERY 503 5227 UNIT 53 0.00 975.07TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,950.14101 104286 11/10/22 7433 IPS GROUP, INC 301 5213 IPS PARKING METER B 0.00 1,442.05 PG CC 12/21/22
26 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 6
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104287 11/10/22 3521 KIMBALL MIDWEST 502 5309 MECH STOCK 0.00 85.17101 104287 11/10/22 3521 KIMBALL MIDWEST 502 5322 MECH STOCK 0.00 490.21TOTAL CHECK 0.00 575.38101 104288 11/10/22 8999 INTERNATIONAL BUSIN 301 5201 FTO SOFTWARE 0.00 1,092.73101 104289 11/10/22 3304 MIDWEST TAPE 401 5303 BOOKS & MATS 0.00 43.49101 104289 11/10/22 3304 MIDWEST TAPE 401 5303 BOOKS & MATS 0.00 48.92TOTAL CHECK 0.00 92.41101 104290 11/10/22 3443 MONTEREY BAY PEST C 503 5223 PW YARD PEST CONTRO 0.00 490.00101 104290 11/10/22 3443 MONTEREY BAY PEST C 503 5223 PW YARD PEST CONTRO 0.00 490.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 980.00101 104291 11/10/22 3807 MONTEREY COUNTY WEE 101 5221 LEGAL AD RE VACANCI 0.00 108.81101 104291 11/10/22 3807 MONTEREY COUNTY WEE 101 5221 SAFE PARKING 2ND RE 0.00 108.81101 104291 11/10/22 3807 MONTEREY COUNTY WEE 101 5221 MAYOR SIGN AUTH 2ND 0.00 108.81101 104291 11/10/22 3807 MONTEREY COUNTY WEE 101 5221 ROADWORK RESTRICION 0.00 108.81101 104291 11/10/22 3807 MONTEREY COUNTY WEE 201 5221 PH−1352 LIGHTHOUSE 0.00 163.22101 104291 11/10/22 3807 MONTEREY COUNTY WEE 201 5221 PH−1631 SUNSET − NA 0.00 181.35TOTAL CHECK 0.00 779.81101 104292 11/10/22 1958 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI 401 5301 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 0.00 −11.49101 104292 11/10/22 1958 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI 201 5301 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 32.42101 104292 11/10/22 1958 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI 401 5301 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 0.00 55.88101 104292 11/10/22 1958 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI 201 5301 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 74.99101 104292 11/10/22 1958 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI 201 5301 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 114.75TOTAL CHECK 0.00 266.55101 104293 11/10/22 9576 O’REILLY AUTO ENTER 301 5227 PD STOCK 0.00 354.66101 104293 11/10/22 9576 O’REILLY AUTO ENTER 503 5227 UNIT 34 0.00 172.48TOTAL CHECK 0.00 527.14101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 7.20101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 7.20101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 7.20101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 502 5309 MECH SUPPLIES 0.00 7.41101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 411 5223 MUSEUM SUPPLIES 0.00 7.64101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 301 5223 PD B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 7.64101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 7.83101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 8.29101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 411 5223 MUSEUM SUPPLIES 0.00 8.73101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 8.73101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 411 5223 MUSEUM SUPPLIES 0.00 8.73101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 9.14101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 9.16101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 9.38101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 401 5223 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 0.00 9.38101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 9.78101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 CASH DISC STMT 10/2 0.00 −177.58101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 0.32 PG CC 12/21/22
27 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 7
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 1.88101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 2.14101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 2.17101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 401 5223 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 0.00 2.58101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 2.61101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 301 5227 PD VEHICLE SUPPLIES 0.00 2.82101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 5.00101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 411 5223 MUSEUM SUPPLIES 0.00 5.01101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 301 5227 PD VEHICLE SUPPLIES 0.00 5.43101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 10.93101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 401 5223 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 0.00 11.76101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 411 5223 MUSEUM SUPPLIES 0.00 12.65101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 301 5227 PD VEHICLE SUPPLIES 0.00 13.07101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 301 5227 PD VEHICLE SUPPLIES 0.00 19.64101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 21.74101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 21.84101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 301 5223 PD B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 21.84101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 24.11101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 25.76101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 26.08101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 505 5309 STREETS SUPPLIES 0.00 26.18101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 411 5223 MUSEUM SUPPLIES 0.00 26.33101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 26.41101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 411 5223 MUSEUM SUPPLIES 0.00 26.60101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 28.15101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 30.57101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 30.58101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 15.23101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 301 5223 PD B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 15.27101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5227 B&G VEHICLE SUPPLIE 0.00 15.28101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 301 5227 PD VEHICLE SUPPLIES 0.00 34.95101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5227 B&G VEH 0.00 35.87101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 38.42101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 411 5223 MUSEUM SUPPLIES 0.00 43.69101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 45.87101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 411 5223 MUSEUM SUPPLIES 0.00 48.03101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 502 5309 MECH SUPPLIES 0.00 49.13101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 50.64101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 411 5223 MUSEUM SUPPLIES 0.00 50.88101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 51.31101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 53.14101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 59.80101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 61.78101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 63.34101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 64.42101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 75.38101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 91.48101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 505 5309 STREETS SUPPLIES 0.00 118.03101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 161.38101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 503 5223 B&G SUPPLIES 0.00 202.44TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,835.82 PG CC 12/21/22
28 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 8
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104300 11/10/22 8887 PENINSULA BUSINESS 301 5291 CSO DESKTOPS 0.00 1,067.57101 104301 11/10/22 2276 BECKS SHOES AND REP 501 5275 NATHAN’S WORKBOOTS 0.00 204.30101 104302 11/10/22 4468 RENTAL DEPOT MONTER 503 5223 STUMP CUTTER 0.00 195.00101 104303 11/10/22 6520 RINCON CONSULTANTS, 225 5209 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAC 0.00 826.50101 104303 11/10/22 6520 RINCON CONSULTANTS, 225 5209 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAC 0.00 9,192.25TOTAL CHECK 0.00 10,018.75101 104304 11/10/22 3828 SAME DAY SHRED 301 5291 SHREDDING SERVICE 0.00 45.00101 104305 11/10/22 2448 SENTRY ALARM SYSTEM 505 5291 TRASH SHOOT SPKLR 0.00 150.00101 104306 11/10/22 2533 SOUTH BAY REG. PUBL 301 5215 CIT/BALLASH 0.00 80.00101 104307 11/10/22 6038 SPEAK WRITE BILLING 301 5201 TRANSCRIPTION SERVI 0.00 692.27101 104309 11/10/22 2680 TOPE’S TREE SERVICE 351 5227 MONTEREY PINE TREES 0.00 183.12101 104309 11/10/22 2680 TOPE’S TREE SERVICE 513 5201 FY22/23 TREE MAINTE 0.00 7,520.00101 104309 11/10/22 2680 TOPE’S TREE SERVICE 513 5201 FY22/23 TREE MAINTE 0.00 20,880.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 28,583.12101 104310 11/10/22 4042 TRI COUNTY BUSINESS 505 5309 CONCRETE MIX 0.00 1,364.26101 104311 11/10/22 7867 UPS 301 5211 SHIPPING 0.00 28.55101 104312 11/10/22 2772 VALLEY SAW & GARDEN 505 5309 CHAINSAW 0.00 533.02101 104313 11/10/22 2786 VERIZON WIRELESS 301 5206 WIRELESS MOBILE CON 0.00 513.22101 104315 11/10/22 9752 ANNA NILSON 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 11.25101 104315 11/10/22 9752 ANNA NILSON 421 4469 SESSION 5A FEE ADJU 0.00 23.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 34.25101 104316 11/10/22 9786 ANTHONY SUH 01 214 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFU 0.00 196.00101 104317 11/10/22 9761 BETH HUBBS 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 12.50101 104317 11/10/22 9761 BETH HUBBS 421 4469 SESSION 5A FEE ADJU 0.00 25.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 37.50101 104318 11/10/22 9763 CARLY ADAMS 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 11.25101 104318 11/10/22 9763 CARLY ADAMS 421 4469 SESSION 5A FEE ADJU 0.00 23.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 34.25101 104319 11/10/22 9789 CHANDRA WEAVER 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 11.25101 104320 11/10/22 9785 ELIZABETH LETLOW 01 214 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFU 0.00 189.00101 104321 11/10/22 9425 ERIN BOYDSTON 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 12.50101 104321 11/10/22 9425 ERIN BOYDSTON 421 4469 SESSION 5A FEE ADJU 0.00 25.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 37.50 PG CC 12/21/22
29 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 9
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104322 11/10/22 8975 HEIHACHIRO TAKARABE 421 5208 TAI CHI CLASSES 0.00 112.00101 104323 11/10/22 9095 HERA BURNS 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 11.25101 104324 11/10/22 9755 JACKIE SEITZ 421 4469 SESSION 5A FEE ADJU 0.00 23.00101 104325 11/10/22 9666 JEANNE KERR 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 11.25101 104325 11/10/22 9666 JEANNE KERR 421 4469 SESSION 5A FEE ADJU 0.00 23.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 34.25101 104326 11/10/22 9790 JULIE MELLIN 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 12.50101 104327 11/10/22 9768 JULIE MORALES 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 12.50101 104328 11/10/22 9791 LINDA BILECI 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 12.50101 104329 11/10/22 9788 MANDI ACKERMAN 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 11.25101 104330 11/10/22 9787 MARIA QUARTAROLO 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 11.25101 104330 11/10/22 9787 MARIA QUARTAROLO 421 4469 SESSION 5A FEE ADJU 0.00 23.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 34.25101 104331 11/10/22 9771 MELISSA FERNANDEZ 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 22.50101 104331 11/10/22 9771 MELISSA FERNANDEZ 421 4469 SESSION 5A FEE ADJU 0.00 46.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 68.50101 104332 11/10/22 9772 MICHELLE ERICKSEN 421 4469 SESSION 5A FEE ADJU 0.00 23.00101 104333 11/10/22 9171 MOLLIE COLLYER 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 11.25101 104333 11/10/22 9171 MOLLIE COLLYER 421 4469 SESSION 5A FEE ADJU 0.00 23.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 34.25101 104334 11/10/22 9689 NIKITA MCKINDER 421 4469 SESSION 5A FEE ADJU 0.00 23.00101 104335 11/10/22 9678 SHIANNE MATTOX 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 12.50101 104335 11/10/22 9678 SHIANNE MATTOX 421 4469 SESSION 5A FEE ADJU 0.00 25.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 37.50101 104336 11/10/22 2506 ANN SMALLWOOD 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 12.50101 104336 11/10/22 2506 ANN SMALLWOOD 421 4469 SESSION 5A FEE ADJU 0.00 25.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 37.50101 104337 11/10/22 8814 STEPHANIE DRISCOLL 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 11.25101 104337 11/10/22 8814 STEPHANIE DRISCOLL 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 12.50TOTAL CHECK 0.00 23.75101 104338 11/10/22 9773 SUSAN CORPUS 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 10.00101 104339 11/10/22 5621 ACCENT CLEAN & SWEE 504 5201 FY22/23 STREET SWEE 0.00 13,266.00101 104339 11/10/22 5621 ACCENT CLEAN & SWEE 504 5201 FY22/23 STREET SWEE 0.00 17,100.00101 104339 11/10/22 5621 ACCENT CLEAN & SWEE 504 5201 FY22/23 STREET SWEE 0.00 17,100.00 PG CC 12/21/22
30 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 10
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104339 V 11/10/22 5621 ACCENT CLEAN & SWEE 504 5201 FY22/23 STREET SWEE 0.00 −17,100.00101 104339 V 11/10/22 5621 ACCENT CLEAN & SWEE 504 5201 FY22/23 STREET SWEE 0.00 −17,100.00101 104339 V 11/10/22 5621 ACCENT CLEAN & SWEE 504 5201 FY22/23 STREET SWEE 0.00 −13,266.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 0.00101 104382 11/10/22 9792 ADEPT ELECTRICAL SE 401 5223 ELECTRICAL WORK 0.00 524.00101 104383 11/10/22 8643 AMANDA BALTIERRA 301 5215 2022 CMPA CONFERENC 0.00 207.50101 104383 11/10/22 8643 AMANDA BALTIERRA 301 5215 PC 832 LAW OF ARRES 0.00 370.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 577.50101 104384 11/10/22 8317 ANDREW BUTLER 201 5215 MILEAGE REIM [email protected] 0.00 433.75101 104386 11/10/22 6329 BURKE, WILLIAMS & S 111 5203 CITY ATTORNEY SERVI 0.00 40,920.00101 104387 11/10/22 5303 VERIZON BUSINESS 301 5206 VERIZON PORT ACCESS 0.00 575.87101 104389 11/10/22 8763 CATHY MADALONE 301 5215 WOMEN LEADERSHIP LA 0.00 174.50101 104390 11/10/22 6309 COLANTUONO, HIGHSMI 111 5205 PG&E UUT LEGAL SERV 0.00 103.20101 104391 11/10/22 9742 CUSTOM INK 121 5236 EMPLOYEE TRAINING D 0.00 4,589.47101 104393 11/10/22 7433 IPS GROUP, INC 301 5224 IPS METER MAINTENAN 0.00 628.28101 104394 11/10/22 6679 IWORQ SYSTEMS 501 5201 IWORQ − ANNUAL PERM 0.00 1,887.50101 104394 11/10/22 6679 IWORQ SYSTEMS 503 5201 IWORQ − ANNUAL PERM 0.00 1,887.50101 104394 11/10/22 6679 IWORQ SYSTEMS 505 5201 IWORQ − ANNUAL PERM 0.00 1,887.50101 104394 11/10/22 6679 IWORQ SYSTEMS 201 5229 IWORQ − ANNUAL PERM 0.00 5,375.00101 104394 11/10/22 6679 IWORQ SYSTEMS 201 5229 IWORQ − ANNUAL PERM 0.00 7,900.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 18,937.50101 104395 11/10/22 9794 JERRY GRAHAM’S AUTO 301 5227 PD UNIT #4 0.00 1,361.28101 104396 11/10/22 9695 JODY GARRY 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 12.57101 104397 11/10/22 9758 LANA WILSON 421 4469 CLASS CANCELLED 10/ 0.00 10.71101 104399 11/10/22 1788 MONTEREY COUNTY CON 101 5261 07/01−09/30/22 0.00 37,175.00101 104399 11/10/22 1788 MONTEREY COUNTY CON 101 5261 10/1−12/31/2022 0.00 37,175.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 74,350.00101 104400 11/10/22 9510 MICHAEL MINE 301 5215 BASIC SWAT COURSE 2 0.00 558.63101 104400 11/10/22 9510 MICHAEL MINE 301 5215 BASIC SWAT COURSE 1 0.00 560.68TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,119.31101 104401 11/10/22 8559 MICHAELA BASANESE 301 5215 CAPE ONE DAY TRAINI 0.00 56.00101 104402 11/10/22 3443 MONTEREY BAY PEST C 503 5223 PEST CONTROL 0.00 490.00101 104403 11/10/22 1958 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI 121 5301 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 72.62101 104403 11/10/22 1958 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI 101 5301 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 72.63 PG CC 12/21/22
31 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 11
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNTTOTAL CHECK 0.00 145.25101 104404 11/10/22 9799 OLGA BARABANOVA 421 5208 PIANO INSTRUCTOR OC 0.00 252.00101 104405 11/10/22 7054 ORLANDO PEREZ 301 5215 SLI 499 0.00 373.76101 104406 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 501 5222 PW 9/28−10/26 11212 0.00 744.58101 104406 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 421 5222 REC 9/27−10/25 4030 0.00 220.64TOTAL CHECK 0.00 965.22101 104410 11/10/22 9305 WATSONVILLE FORD 301 5227 PD UNIT 2 0.00 722.47101 104411 11/10/22 6216 MONTEREY BAY TREEWO 513 5201 FY22/23 ARBORIST SE 0.00 3,200.00101 104412 11/10/22 8989 WEX BANK 301 5311 FUEL 0.00 63.56101 104415 11/10/22 5621 ACCENT CLEAN & SWEE 504 5201 FY22/23 STREET SWEE 0.00 13,266.00101 104415 11/10/22 5621 ACCENT CLEAN & SWEE 504 5201 FY22/23 STREET SWEE 0.00 17,100.00101 104415 11/10/22 5621 ACCENT CLEAN & SWEE 504 5201 FY22/23 STREET SWEE 0.00 17,100.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 47,466.00101 104417 11/14/22 6552 REGAN BIOLOGICAL 501 5275 MONARCH SANCTURAY 0.00 1,000.00101 104419 11/14/22 8866 LEGAL NOTIFICATION 301 5201 ISUBPOENA NOV22−OCT 0.00 1,199.75101 104419 V 11/14/22 8866 LEGAL NOTIFICATION 301 5201 ISUBPOENA NOV22−OCT 0.00 −1,199.75TOTAL CHECK 0.00 0.00101 104420 11/14/22 2541 SPCA OF MONTEREY CO 301 5201 ANIMAL SHELTER SERV 0.00 525.00101 104421 11/14/22 7867 UPS 301 5211 SHIPPING 0.00 11.05101 104421 11/14/22 7867 UPS 301 5211 SHIPPING 0.00 12.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 23.05101 104422 11/18/22 2952 AFLAC 01 202 DED:5291 AFLAC P/T 0.00 69.24101 104422 11/18/22 2952 AFLAC 01 202 DED:5200 AFLAC PREM 0.00 678.09101 104422 11/18/22 2952 AFLAC 01 202 DED:5201 AFLAC P/T 0.00 1,709.54TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2,456.87101 104423 11/18/22 2935 CALIF LAW ENFORCMEN 01 202 DED:3200 LTD PD 0.00 567.00101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:2074 HEALTH 0.00 911.50101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:118 HEALTH 0.00 911.60101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:109 HEALTH 0.00 1,015.82101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:120 HEALTH 0.00 1,015.82101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:531 HEALTH 0.00 1,051.86101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:1 HEALTH 0.00 1,057.01101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:2225 HEALTH INS 0.00 1,057.01101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:0563 HEALTH FAM 0.00 1,114.18101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:2072 HEALTH 0.00 1,725.00101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:110 HEALTH 0.00 2,031.62101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:2071 HEALTH 0.00 2,397.00101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:103 HEALTH 0.00 2,454.34 PG CC 12/21/22
32 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 12
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:105 HEALTH 0.00 2,734.80101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:102 HEALTH 0.00 2,748.24101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:533 HEALTH 0.00 3,646.40101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:106 HEALTH 0.00 3,699.57101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:2073 HEALTH FAM 0.00 4,438.00101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:104 HEALTH 0.00 6,311.07101 104424 11/18/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 01 202 DED:100 HEALTH 0.00 6,342.12TOTAL CHECK 0.00 46,662.96101 104425 11/18/22 3134 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:3300 AFLAC DEP 0.00 348.00101 104425 11/18/22 3134 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:3301 AFLAC MED 0.00 2,241.48TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2,589.48101 104426 11/18/22 3393 EFT 01 202 DED:*FM MEDICARE 0.00 10,936.38101 104426 11/18/22 3393 EFT 01 202 DED:*SCA STATE TAX 0.00 17,451.66101 104426 11/18/22 3393 EFT 01 202 DED:*FT FEDERAL TX 0.00 46,008.48TOTAL CHECK 0.00 74,396.52101 104427 11/18/22 9589 FOREMAN FINANCIAL, 01 202 DED:7506 WAGE ORDER 0.00 555.29101 104428 11/18/22 3404 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 01 202 DED:7502 WAGE GARN 0.00 97.85101 104429 11/18/22 2946 PACIFIC GROVE CITY 01 202 DED:7000 ASSOC DUES 0.00 760.00101 104430 11/18/22 2938 MASS MUTUAL (457 PL 01 202 DED:3999 ROTH IRA 0.00 765.00101 104430 11/18/22 2938 MASS MUTUAL (457 PL 01 202 DED:4000 DEF COMP 0.00 9,543.57TOTAL CHECK 0.00 10,308.57101 104431 11/18/22 2936 MTRY COUNTY DEPT OF 01 202 DED:0023 GARNISH 0.00 236.30101 104432 11/18/22 2949 PACIFIC GROVE MANAG 01 202 DED:7203 ASSOC DUES 0.00 30.00101 104433 11/18/22 2051 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:1006 WORK COMP 0.00 19.72101 104433 11/18/22 2051 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:1009 WORK COMP 0.00 64.35101 104433 11/18/22 2051 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:1005 WORK COMP 0.00 1,338.23101 104433 11/18/22 2051 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:1010 WORK COMP 0.00 2,988.25101 104433 11/18/22 2051 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:1003 WORK COMP 0.00 6,768.82TOTAL CHECK 0.00 11,179.37101 104434 11/18/22 2052 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:7510 PERS REIMB 0.00 44.13101 104435 11/18/22 2053 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:2101 DENTAL 0.00 132.65101 104435 11/18/22 2053 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:201 DENTAL 0.00 187.95101 104435 11/18/22 2053 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:202 DENTAL 0.00 189.64101 104435 11/18/22 2053 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:2102 DENTAL 0.00 375.90101 104435 11/18/22 2053 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:200 DENTAL 0.00 606.40101 104435 11/18/22 2053 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:2103 DENTAL FAM 0.00 616.33TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2,108.87101 104436 11/18/22 2054 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO 01 202 DED:0005 SUTA 0.00 135.55101 104437 11/18/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0019 PERS RT SF 0.00 −3.25 PG CC 12/21/22
33 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 13
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104437 11/18/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0004 SURV BEN 0.00 87.42101 104437 11/18/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0022 PERS SP MS 0.00 183.40101 104437 11/18/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:08 PERS OTHER 0.00 441.47101 104437 11/18/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0018 PERS SP SF 0.00 702.07101 104437 11/18/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:2001 PERS 0.00 880.32101 104437 11/18/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0009 PERS OTHER 0.00 1,000.12101 104437 11/18/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:2000 PERS EMPLY 0.00 1,179.00101 104437 11/18/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0002 PERS 0.00 5,670.87101 104437 11/18/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:07 PERS CITY 0.00 5,888.34101 104437 11/18/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0017 PERS RG SF 0.00 5,962.65101 104437 11/18/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0011 PERS ER SF 0.00 6,548.70101 104437 11/18/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0021 PERS REG M 0.00 8,387.86101 104437 11/18/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0020 PERS ER M3 0.00 9,485.57101 104437 11/18/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:0006 PERS CITY 0.00 11,535.29101 104437 11/18/22 2133 PERS 01 202 DED:01 PERS 0.00 11,595.97TOTAL CHECK 0.00 69,545.80101 104438 11/18/22 2943 POLICE OFFICERS ASS 01 202 DED:7204 ASSOC DUES 0.00 7.00101 104438 11/18/22 2943 POLICE OFFICERS ASS 01 202 DED:7205 ASSOC DUES 0.00 931.24TOTAL CHECK 0.00 938.24101 104439 11/18/22 2940 LEGAL SHIELD 01 202 DED:6100 LEGAL SVC 0.00 14.95101 104440 11/18/22 7956 STATE DISABILITY TA 01 202 DED:0026 SDI 0.00 4,143.97101 104441 11/18/22 8211 STANDARD INSURANCE 01 202 DED:3500 LIFE INS 0.00 1,417.50101 104442 11/18/22 8352 TRANSAMERICA EMPLOY 01 202 DED:5202 TRANSAMERI 0.00 627.08101 104443 11/18/22 4177 UNION BANK OF CALIF 01 202 DED:4005 PARS−457 0.00 543.55101 104444 11/18/22 632 VISION SERVICE PLAN 01 202 DED:2502 VISION 0.00 41.88101 104444 11/18/22 632 VISION SERVICE PLAN 01 202 DED:302 VISION 0.00 60.00101 104444 11/18/22 632 VISION SERVICE PLAN 01 202 DED:301 VISION 0.00 135.00101 104444 11/18/22 632 VISION SERVICE PLAN 01 202 DED:300 VISION 0.00 230.34101 104444 11/18/22 632 VISION SERVICE PLAN 01 202 DED:2503 VISION FAM 0.00 270.01TOTAL CHECK 0.00 737.23101 104446 11/23/22 4458 A TO Z RENTAL CENTE 121 5236 EE TRAINING−TABLES 0.00 595.96101 104447 11/23/22 5621 ACCENT CLEAN & SWEE 504 5201 FY22/23 STREET SWEE 0.00 17,100.00101 104449 11/23/22 9807 ALEX OTHON 201 5221 REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 52.50101 104450 11/23/22 3970 ALHAMBRA & SIERRA S 421 5201 WATER SERVICE 0.00 139.31101 104451 11/23/22 4965 ALVAREZ TECHNOLOGY 133 5201 AFTER HOURS SUPPORT 0.00 450.00101 104452 11/23/22 9809 AMANDA MOORE 01 214 DEPOSIT REFUND 0.00 196.00101 104453 11/23/22 8330 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 501 5291 TREE LIGHTING EVENT 0.00 27.97101 104453 11/23/22 8330 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 501 5275 BIKE LIGHTS 0.00 48.05 PG CC 12/21/22
34 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 14
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104453 11/23/22 8330 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 501 5301 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 48.58101 104453 11/23/22 8330 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 501 5291 SPEAKER CORD 0.00 54.61TOTAL CHECK 0.00 179.21101 104454 11/23/22 3905 AMERICAN LOCK & KEY 503 5223 KEYS 0.00 27.31101 104454 11/23/22 3905 AMERICAN LOCK & KEY 503 5223 ENTRY DOOR KNOB 0.00 34.96TOTAL CHECK 0.00 62.27101 104455 11/23/22 106 AMERICAN SUPPLY COM 503 5305 FACE MASKS 0.00 185.73101 104455 11/23/22 106 AMERICAN SUPPLY COM 503 5305 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 0.00 26.44101 104455 11/23/22 106 AMERICAN SUPPLY COM 503 5305 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 0.00 71.56101 104455 11/23/22 106 AMERICAN SUPPLY COM 503 5305 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 0.00 923.55101 104455 11/23/22 106 AMERICAN SUPPLY COM 503 5305 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 0.00 2,096.56101 104455 11/23/22 106 AMERICAN SUPPLY COM 503 5305 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 0.00 329.61TOTAL CHECK 0.00 3,633.45101 104456 11/23/22 9685 ANASTACIA WYATT 201 5291 REIM AUTH PURCH CDD 0.00 43.49101 104457 11/23/22 9430 ARAMARK UNIFORM & C 301 5201 DEPARTMENT LINEN AN 0.00 114.85101 104457 11/23/22 9430 ARAMARK UNIFORM & C 301 5201 DEPARTMENT LINEN AN 0.00 114.85101 104457 11/23/22 9430 ARAMARK UNIFORM & C 301 5201 DEPARTMENT LINEN AN 0.00 114.85TOTAL CHECK 0.00 344.55101 104458 11/23/22 6154 AT&T 133 5212 ADMN ALM 237 841−13 0.00 33.97101 104458 11/23/22 6154 AT&T 421 5212 REC ALM 237 351−629 0.00 33.97TOTAL CHECK 0.00 67.94101 104459 11/23/22 9805 AT&T 133 5206 LH INTRNT 10/29−11/ 0.00 90.24101 104460 11/23/22 5363 AT&T CALNET 3 133 5212 ADMIN 0.00 24.07101 104461 11/23/22 8476 AT&T MOBILITY 301 5206 AT&T FIRSTNET DEPAR 0.00 2,296.50101 104462 11/23/22 9399 ATHENA MEDICAL GROU 121 5236 COVID SWAB 0.00 320.00101 104463 11/23/22 213 BAKER & TAYLOR COMP 401 5301 LIB SUPPLIES 0.00 29.62101 104463 11/23/22 213 BAKER & TAYLOR COMP 401 5301 LIB SUPPLIES 0.00 30.99101 104463 11/23/22 213 BAKER & TAYLOR COMP 401 5303 BOOKS & MATERIALS 0.00 379.93101 104463 11/23/22 213 BAKER & TAYLOR COMP 401 5303 BOOKS & MATERIALS 0.00 401.06TOTAL CHECK 0.00 841.60101 104464 11/23/22 9515 KYLE BAUM 301 5215 COURSE TUITION 0.00 175.00101 104464 11/23/22 9515 KYLE BAUM 301 5215 RESILIENCY & WELLNE 0.00 74.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 249.00101 104465 11/23/22 7061 BEACH HOUSE BAR AND 503 5201 CLEANING CONTRACT 0.00 2,400.00101 104468 11/23/22 402 CA DEPT OF JUSTICE 121 5201 CRIMIAL BACKGROUND 0.00 32.00101 104468 11/23/22 402 CA DEPT OF JUSTICE 121 5201 CRIMIAL BACKGROUND 0.00 32.00101 104468 11/23/22 402 CA DEPT OF JUSTICE 121 5201 CRIMINAL BACKGROUND 0.00 128.00101 104468 11/23/22 402 CA DEPT OF JUSTICE 301 5201 DOJ LIVESCANS 0.00 1,120.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,312.00 PG CC 12/21/22
35 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 15
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104470 11/23/22 8763 CATHY MADALONE 301 5215 IACP CONFERENCE 0.00 396.75101 104471 11/23/22 1040 CENGAGE LEARNING/GA 401 5303 BOOKS & MATS 0.00 33.20101 104471 11/23/22 1040 CENGAGE LEARNING/GA 401 5303 BOOKS & MATS 0.00 66.40101 104471 11/23/22 1040 CENGAGE LEARNING/GA 401 5303 BOOKS & MATS 0.00 55.91TOTAL CHECK 0.00 155.51101 104472 11/23/22 2993 CENTRALSQUARE TECHN 131 5201 FINANCE SOFTWARE 0.00 4,296.93101 104473 11/23/22 5198 CODE PUBLISHING, IN 101 5201 CODE UPDATE 0.00 155.25101 104474 11/23/22 6309 COLANTUONO, HIGHSMI 111 5205 LEGAL ASSISTANCE − 0.00 375.00101 104475 11/23/22 5171 COMCAST 133 5206 INTERNET PD 0387836 0.00 151.23101 104475 11/23/22 5171 COMCAST 133 5206 INTERNET REC 0.00 103.75101 104475 11/23/22 5171 COMCAST 133 5206 INTERNET PW 0389527 0.00 110.98101 104475 11/23/22 5171 COMCAST 133 5206 INTERNET PW 0194117 0.00 238.76TOTAL CHECK 0.00 604.72101 104476 11/23/22 669 CPOA 301 5261 CPOA PROF MEMEBERSH 0.00 100.00101 104476 11/23/22 669 CPOA 301 5261 CPOA DEPT MEMEBERSH 0.00 750.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 850.00101 104477 11/23/22 9499 CSI HR GROUP 121 5237 TRAINING − EE 0.00 320.00101 104478 11/23/22 698 CSMFO 131 5261 POPE MEMBERSHIP 202 0.00 50.00101 104479 11/23/22 819 DOCTORS ON DUTY MED 501 5291 516644 ALCARAZ DMV 0.00 150.00101 104480 11/23/22 9810 ELIZABETH SHAMMAS 01 214 DEPOSIT REFUND 0.00 531.00101 104481 11/23/22 3342 EVA RASUL 301 5215 COURSE TUITION 0.00 175.00101 104481 11/23/22 3342 EVA RASUL 301 5215 RESILIENCY & WELLNE 0.00 74.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 249.00101 104482 11/23/22 926 EWING IRRIGATION PR 503 5223 PERKINS PARK 0.00 106.58101 104483 11/23/22 592 FOREST HILL ACE HAR 503 5223 SIGN 0.00 24.02101 104483 11/23/22 592 FOREST HILL ACE HAR 503 5223 RECEPTACLE 0.00 16.35TOTAL CHECK 0.00 40.37101 104484 11/23/22 7127 GACHINA LANDSCAPE M 503 5201 LANDSCAPE NOV−FEB 0.00 639.63101 104485 11/23/22 7884 GARDAWORLD 131 5202 NOV 2022 0.00 86.32101 104487 11/23/22 1105 GRANITE ROCK COMPAN 505 5309 0.00 580.83101 104490 11/23/22 1138 GROVE MARKET 421 5361 PROGRAM SUPPLIES CA 0.00 20.66101 104491 11/23/22 1266 HOWARD’S UPHOLSTERY 503 5227 UNIT 52 0.00 975.07 PG CC 12/21/22
36 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 16
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104492 11/23/22 8993 HR & ASSOCIATES 225 5201 ATC PLANNING SERVIC 0.00 787.50101 104493 11/23/22 1298 IACP 301 5261 IACP MEMBERSHIP 0.00 525.00101 104494 11/23/22 4123 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC 505 5331 STREET STRIPING PAI 0.00 5,755.51101 104495 11/23/22 7672 JUSTIN HANKES 301 5215 COURSE TUITION 0.00 175.00101 104495 11/23/22 7672 JUSTIN HANKES 301 5215 RESILIENCY & WELLNE 0.00 74.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 249.00101 104496 11/23/22 4367 KELLY MOORE PAINT C 301 5223 PAINT & SUPPLIES 0.00 30.44101 104496 11/23/22 4367 KELLY MOORE PAINT C 301 5223 PAINT & SUPPLIES 0.00 345.55101 104496 11/23/22 4367 KELLY MOORE PAINT C 301 5223 PAINT SUPPLIES 0.00 458.37TOTAL CHECK 0.00 834.36101 104497 11/23/22 3521 KIMBALL MIDWEST 502 5309 PUMP FOR CAR WASH 0.00 167.94101 104497 11/23/22 3521 KIMBALL MIDWEST 502 5309 CAR WASH SUPPLIES 0.00 91.88101 104497 11/23/22 3521 KIMBALL MIDWEST 502 5309 MECH STOCK 0.00 301.38101 104497 11/23/22 3521 KIMBALL MIDWEST 502 5309 MECH STOCK 0.00 529.32TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,090.52101 104498 11/23/22 9811 KORA SAMBRANO 01 214 DEPOSIT REFUND 0.00 185.00101 104499 11/23/22 5000 LIBRARICA LLC 401 5201 CONTRACT SERVICE 0.00 298.50101 104500 11/23/22 8738 LIFTOFF LLC 133 5229 OFFICE 360 LICENSES 0.00 315.00101 104501 11/23/22 3684 AMI LONSINGER 301 5215 COURSE TUITION 0.00 175.00101 104501 11/23/22 3684 AMI LONSINGER 301 5215 RESILIENCY & WELLNE 0.00 74.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 249.00101 104502 11/23/22 8647 MAIN STREET SIGNS 505 5309 SIGNS 0.00 94.02101 104504 11/23/22 8559 MICHAELA BASANESE 301 5215 COURSE TUITION 0.00 175.00101 104504 11/23/22 8559 MICHAELA BASANESE 301 5215 RESILIENCY & WELLNE 0.00 74.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 249.00101 104505 11/23/22 3304 MIDWEST TAPE 401 5303 BOOKS & MATS 0.00 32.76101 104505 11/23/22 3304 MIDWEST TAPE 401 5303 BOOKS & MATS 0.00 43.69101 104505 11/23/22 3304 MIDWEST TAPE 401 5303 BOOKS & MATS 0.00 54.61101 104505 11/23/22 3304 MIDWEST TAPE 401 5303 BOOKS & MATS 0.00 98.30TOTAL CHECK 0.00 229.36101 104506 11/23/22 1694 MISSION UNIFORM SER 421 5201 LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 0.00 13.34101 104506 11/23/22 1694 MISSION UNIFORM SER 421 5201 LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 0.00 13.34101 104506 11/23/22 1694 MISSION UNIFORM SER 421 5201 LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 0.00 13.34101 104506 11/23/22 1694 MISSION UNIFORM SER 421 5201 LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 0.00 13.34101 104506 11/23/22 1694 MISSION UNIFORM SER 421 5201 LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 0.00 72.88101 104506 11/23/22 1694 MISSION UNIFORM SER 421 5201 LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 0.00 72.88101 104506 11/23/22 1694 MISSION UNIFORM SER 421 5201 LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 0.00 72.88101 104506 11/23/22 1694 MISSION UNIFORM SER 421 5201 LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 0.00 72.88TOTAL CHECK 0.00 344.88 PG CC 12/21/22
37 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 17
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104507 11/23/22 3807 MONTEREY COUNTY WEE 201 5221 PH−1631 SUNSET CORR 0.00 181.35101 104507 11/23/22 3807 MONTEREY COUNTY WEE 201 5221 PH−HRI REMOVAL 11−1 0.00 199.49101 104507 11/23/22 3807 MONTEREY COUNTY WEE 201 5221 2ND READ BUILD CODE 0.00 108.81101 104507 11/23/22 3807 MONTEREY COUNTY WEE 101 5221 ADOPT OF ORD 22−017 0.00 108.81101 104507 11/23/22 3807 MONTEREY COUNTY WEE 101 5221 ADOPTION 22−018 0.00 108.81101 104507 11/23/22 3807 MONTEREY COUNTY WEE 101 5221 ADOPTION ORD 22−016 0.00 108.81TOTAL CHECK 0.00 816.08101 104508 11/23/22 1775 MONTEREY FIRE EXTIN 503 5223 FIRE EXTINGUISHER S 0.00 60.00101 104508 11/23/22 1775 MONTEREY FIRE EXTIN 503 5223 FIRE EXTINGUISHER S 0.00 84.00101 104508 11/23/22 1775 MONTEREY FIRE EXTIN 503 5223 FIRE EXTINGUISHER S 0.00 96.00101 104508 11/23/22 1775 MONTEREY FIRE EXTIN 503 5223 FIRE EXTINGUISHER S 0.00 112.20TOTAL CHECK 0.00 352.20101 104509 11/23/22 1798 MONTEREY ONE WATER 411 5222 09/01−10/31/22 0011 0.00 197.92101 104510 11/23/22 1786 MONTEREY PENINSULA 505 5309 STRM WTR WRK−OVB 0.00 3,500.00101 104511 11/23/22 1802 CITY OF MONTEREY 351 5201 FY 22/23 FIRE SERVI 0.00 235,786.16101 104512 11/23/22 2986 MUNICIPAL MAINTENAN 301 5227 PE UNIT 2 0.00 517.09101 104514 11/23/22 1958 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI 201 5301 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 201.56101 104514 11/23/22 1958 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI 201 5301 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 18.56101 104514 11/23/22 1958 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI 201 5301 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 27.30101 104514 11/23/22 1958 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI 121 5301 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 74.20TOTAL CHECK 0.00 321.62101 104515 11/23/22 9576 O’REILLY AUTO ENTER 501 5227 PW UNIT 69 0.00 54.60101 104515 11/23/22 9576 O’REILLY AUTO ENTER 503 5227 B&G UNIT 53 0.00 104.81101 104515 11/23/22 9576 O’REILLY AUTO ENTER 505 5227 UNIT 28 0.00 107.07101 104515 11/23/22 9576 O’REILLY AUTO ENTER 502 5309 MECH STOCK 0.00 240.34TOTAL CHECK 0.00 506.82101 104516 11/23/22 7054 ORLANDO PEREZ 301 5215 SLI 499 5 OF 8 0.00 26.29101 104516 11/23/22 7054 ORLANDO PEREZ 301 5215 SLI 499 6 OF 8 0.00 308.64TOTAL CHECK 0.00 334.93101 104517 11/23/22 5567 OVERDRIVE, INC. 401 5303 BOOKS & MATS 0.00 8.97101 104518 11/23/22 9528 PACIFIC CHESS ACADE 421 5208 CONTRACTOR PAYMENT 0.00 2,083.20101 104519 11/23/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 411 5802 MUSEUM 1932414440−1 0.00 270.67101 104521 11/23/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 301 5291 SPARE KEY PST LOCKE 0.00 3.27101 104521 11/23/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 301 5291 DRILL BIT SET 0.00 18.67TOTAL CHECK 0.00 21.94101 104522 11/23/22 2062 PACIFIC WEST WATER 131 5301 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 42.85101 104522 11/23/22 2062 PACIFIC WEST WATER 201 5301 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 42.85TOTAL CHECK 0.00 85.70 PG CC 12/21/22
38 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 18
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104523 11/23/22 9803 PAUL BLACK 121 5202 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY 0.00 1,800.00101 104524 11/23/22 8285 PAUL NAGAMINE 301 5215 COURSE TUITION 0.00 175.00101 104524 11/23/22 8285 PAUL NAGAMINE 301 5215 RESILIENCY & WELLNE 0.00 74.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 249.00101 104525 11/23/22 8383 POWER DMS 301 5201 CALEA DOC MANAGEMEN 0.00 625.00101 104526 11/23/22 2219 PURE WATER 501 5309 WATER SVC 0.00 24.65101 104526 11/23/22 2219 PURE WATER 502 5309 WATER SVC 0.00 24.65101 104526 11/23/22 2219 PURE WATER 503 5309 WATER SVC 0.00 24.65101 104526 11/23/22 2219 PURE WATER 505 5309 WATER SVC 0.00 24.65TOTAL CHECK 0.00 98.60101 104527 11/23/22 9815 RANDLE J KASHUBA 01 4203 REFUND CC & PLAN FE 0.00 36.00101 104528 11/23/22 7621 READY REFRESH 301 5291 WATER SERVICE 0.00 189.39101 104529 11/23/22 4468 RENTAL DEPOT MONTER 503 5223 PERKINS PARK 0.00 487.73101 104530 11/23/22 9802 ROBERT HALF INTERNA 131 5201 CARRILLO TEMP EMP M 0.00 7,290.00101 104531 11/23/22 4887 ROOTER KING 01 4203 REFUND PERMIT 22108 0.00 82.50101 104531 11/23/22 4887 ROOTER KING 01 4203 REFUND PMTS 221106− 0.00 316.80TOTAL CHECK 0.00 399.30101 104532 11/23/22 2360 RYDIN DECAL 01 220 RES PARKING PERMITS 0.00 27.06101 104532 11/23/22 2360 RYDIN DECAL 301 5291 RES PARKING PERMITS 0.00 319.38TOTAL CHECK 0.00 346.44101 104533 11/23/22 2448 SENTRY ALARM SYSTEM 503 5223 GOLF LINKS 0.00 180.00101 104533 11/23/22 2448 SENTRY ALARM SYSTEM 503 5223 GENERATOR ROOM 0.00 180.00101 104533 11/23/22 2448 SENTRY ALARM SYSTEM 401 5223 LIBRARY 0.00 200.33101 104533 11/23/22 2448 SENTRY ALARM SYSTEM 351 5223 FIRE DEPT 0.00 348.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 908.33101 104535 11/23/22 2541 SPCA OF MONTEREY CO 301 5201 ANIMAL SHELTER SERV 0.00 175.00101 104536 11/23/22 2567 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 301 5301 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 13.10101 104536 11/23/22 2567 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 301 5301 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 31.66101 104536 11/23/22 2567 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 301 5301 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 66.62101 104536 11/23/22 2567 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 301 5301 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 97.84TOTAL CHECK 0.00 209.22101 104537 11/23/22 1768 STURDY OIL COMPANY 421 5311 FUEL DIST OCT 2022 0.00 21.37101 104537 11/23/22 1768 STURDY OIL COMPANY 503 5311 FUEL DIST OCT 2022 0.00 1,042.99101 104537 11/23/22 1768 STURDY OIL COMPANY 301 5311 FUEL DIST OCT 2022 0.00 2,274.42101 104537 11/23/22 1768 STURDY OIL COMPANY 01 111 FUEL DIST OCT 2022 0.00 3,834.03101 104537 11/23/22 1768 STURDY OIL COMPANY 505 5311 FUEL DIST OCT 2022 0.00 521.49TOTAL CHECK 0.00 7,694.30 PG CC 12/21/22
39 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 19
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104538 11/23/22 9796 TAMIE ACEVES 01 4401 PERMIT NOT REQ 0.00 1,667.05101 104539 11/23/22 1758 THE MONTEREY COUNTY 101 5221 DEI CONSULTANT RFQ 0.00 162.30101 104540 11/23/22 4650 TORO PETROLEUM CORP 351 5311 FIRE DEPT 600 PINE 0.00 1,785.44101 104541 11/23/22 8379 TRANSUNION RISK AND 301 5201 4170441/TLO 0.00 75.00101 104542 11/23/22 9148 TRI COUNTY CONCRETE 505 5331 CONCRETE 0.00 1,364.26101 104542 11/23/22 9148 TRI COUNTY CONCRETE 505 5331 JEWELL & 19TH 0.00 405.09TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,769.35101 104543 11/23/22 7360 UNIVERSITY CORP AT 501 5291 SUSTAIN CITY JUNE20 0.00 1,654.11101 104544 11/23/22 7867 UPS 301 5211 SHIPPING 0.00 8.71101 104545 11/23/22 2786 VERIZON WIRELESS 121 5212 CM 0.00 19.34101 104545 11/23/22 2786 VERIZON WIRELESS 133 5212 ADMIN 0.00 51.30101 104545 11/23/22 2786 VERIZON WIRELESS 351 5212 FIRE 0.00 62.16101 104545 11/23/22 2786 VERIZON WIRELESS 301 5212 PD 0.00 63.96101 104545 11/23/22 2786 VERIZON WIRELESS 201 5212 CDD 0.00 71.58101 104545 11/23/22 2786 VERIZON WIRELESS 421 5212 REC 0.00 87.58101 104545 11/23/22 2786 VERIZON WIRELESS 501 5212 PW 0.00 546.69TOTAL CHECK 0.00 902.61101 104547 11/23/22 8531 VINCENT GARCIA 301 5215 GENETEC RECERT 0.00 245.00101 104548 11/23/22 9305 WATSONVILLE FORD 503 5223 PD UNIT PE #2 0.00 281.06101 104549 11/23/22 6216 MONTEREY BAY TREEWO 513 5201 INV000532 PAID TWIC 0.00 −3,200.00101 104549 11/23/22 6216 MONTEREY BAY TREEWO 513 5201 10/17−10/28/2022 0.00 1,200.00101 104549 11/23/22 6216 MONTEREY BAY TREEWO 513 5201 10/31−11/11/2022 0.00 2,100.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 100.00101 104550 11/23/22 8136 WELLS FARGO VENDOR 501 5225 FY 22/23 KONIKA LEA 0.00 134.66101 104550 11/23/22 8136 WELLS FARGO VENDOR 401 5225 FY 22/23 KONIKA LEA 0.00 167.20101 104550 11/23/22 8136 WELLS FARGO VENDOR 121 5225 FY 22/23 KONIKA LEA 0.00 177.68101 104550 11/23/22 8136 WELLS FARGO VENDOR 131 5225 FY 22/23 KONIKA LEA 0.00 177.78101 104550 11/23/22 8136 WELLS FARGO VENDOR 301 5225 FY 22/23 KONIKA LEA 0.00 177.78101 104550 11/23/22 8136 WELLS FARGO VENDOR 201 5225 FY 22/23 KONIKA LEA 0.00 209.26TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,044.36101 104552 11/23/22 2894 WILSON’S PLUMBING & 503 5223 FURNACE WORK 0.00 207.37101 104552 11/23/22 2894 WILSON’S PLUMBING & 503 5223 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 0.00 18.26101 104552 11/23/22 2894 WILSON’S PLUMBING & 503 5223 REPAIR GAS LINE GOL 0.00 682.47101 104552 11/23/22 2894 WILSON’S PLUMBING & 301 5223 POLICE DEPT PLUMBIN 0.00 818.57101 104552 11/23/22 2894 WILSON’S PLUMBING & 301 5223 POLICE DEPT PLUMBIN 0.00 440.96TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2,167.63101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 106 7TH ST PARK 0.00 38.38101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 765 LIGHTHSE IRRIG 0.00 38.39101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 748 LIGHTHSE IRRG 0.00 38.39 PG CC 12/21/22
40 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 20
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 131 5222 300 FOREST IRRIG 0.00 38.39101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 131 5222 308 16TH ST. 0.00 38.39101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 800 LIGHTHSE PLANTE 0.00 38.40101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 792 LIGHTHSE IRRIG 0.00 38.40101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 840 LIGHTHSE PLANTE 0.00 38.40101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 850 LIGHTHSE PLANTE 0.00 38.40101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 882 LIGHTHSE PLANTE 0.00 38.40101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 2100 SUNSET DRIVE 0.00 38.42101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 582 LIGHTHSE IRRIG 0.00 38.42101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 131 5222 300 FOREST FIRE−50% 0.00 23.78101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 201 5222 300 FOREST FIRE−50% 0.00 23.78101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 501 5222 MECH 5% 0.00 24.08101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 351 5222 643 HYDRANTS HYDT 0.00 36.56101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 421 5222 CENTRAL 4 IN FIRE 0.00 47.56101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 351 5222 600 PINE AVE FIRE 0.00 47.56101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 411 5222 165 FOREST AVE FIRE 0.00 47.56101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 421 5222 139 GRAND AVE 0.00 61.37101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 100 OCEANVW IRRIG 0.00 186.19101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 421 5222 980 PIEDMONT BALL P 0.00 186.19101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 196 OCEANVW IRRIG 0.00 186.19101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 429 LIGHTHOUSE IRRG 0.00 186.24101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 619 OCEANVIEW IRRIG 0.00 186.29101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 131 5222 300 FOREST AVE 0.00 186.42101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 421 5222 616 OCEANVIEW IRRG 0.00 193.88101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 421 5222 611 CENTRAL AVE 0.00 214.74101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 501 5222 SUNSET−CORPYARD18% 0.00 86.69101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 130 LIGHTHOUSE IRRI 0.00 93.81101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 585 LAUREL 0.00 93.92101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 B & G 15% 0.00 72.24101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 201 5222 304 16TH ST FIRE 0.00 79.78101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 165 FOREST−MUSEUM 0.00 239.33101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 351 5222 600 PINE 0.00 244.44101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 391 OCEANVW−BERWICK 0.00 297.16101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 201 5222 304 16TH ST BDOM−FI 0.00 307.61101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 707 OCEANVIEW−NAIAD 0.00 313.74101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 421 5222 515 JUNIPERO 0.00 329.68101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 301 5222 580 PINE 0.00 343.34101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 1025 MORSE−PLATT PK 0.00 368.05101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 131 5222 300 FOREST 0.00 374.02101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 711 OCEANVIEW IRRG 0.00 567.86101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 1051 OCEANVIEW IRRG 0.00 599.35101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 401 5222 550 CENTRAL 0.00 834.86101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 421 5222 114 CALEDONIA PK 0.00 859.61101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 421 5222 616 OCEANVW−SWIM PL 0.00 912.15101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 263 GROVE ACRES 0.00 922.15101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 863 OCEANVIEW IRRG 0.00 938.31101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 421 5222 150 FOREST−JEWELL P 0.00 1,888.45101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 421 5222 230 17−MILE DRIVE 0.00 2,307.18101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 930 SINEX 0.00 941.94101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 610 OCEANVW IRRIGPK 0.00 964.05101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 503 5222 620 OCEANVIEW/BATH 0.00 1,267.58TOTAL CHECK 0.00 18,546.47 PG CC 12/21/22
41 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 21
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 201 5291 WYATT CC OCT 2022 0.00 6.00101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 133 5306 KHASIMI CC OCT 2022 0.00 14.99101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 501 5261 GHO CC OCT 2022 0.00 15.96101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 121 5301 LIVIAN CC OCT 2022 0.00 20.75101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 131 5291 FRATI CC OCT 2022 0.00 21.85101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 301 5306 FRANCIS CC OCT 2022 0.00 32.29101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 121 5309 LIVIAN CC OCT 2022 0.00 38.23101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 131 5291 HANNAH CC OCT 2022 0.00 49.95101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 301 5261 PD TRAVEL CC OCT 20 0.00 52.00101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 301 5211 PD TRAVEL CC OCT 20 0.00 52.54101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 121 5236 LINDSTROM CC OCT 20 0.00 54.58101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 121 5217 HARVEY CC OCT 2022 0.00 61.60101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 301 5291 MADALONE CC OCT 202 0.00 61.97101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 121 5261 LINDSTROM CC OCT 20 0.00 68.00101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 501 5291 GHO CC OCT 2022 0.00 126.26101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 501 5215 GHO CC OCT 2022 0.00 150.00101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 301 5224 FRANCIS CC OCT 2022 0.00 160.00101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 401 5223 GODWIN CC OCT 2022 0.00 165.00101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 101 5291 LINDSTROM CC OCT 20 0.00 232.59101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 133 5307 KHASIMI CC OCT 2022 0.00 247.81101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 101 5291 HARVEY CC OCT 2022 0.00 260.17101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 301 5291 FRANCIS CC OCT 2022 0.00 275.88101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 401 5301 GODWIN CC OCT 2022 0.00 276.51101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 121 5236 GODWIN CC OCT 2022 0.00 309.93101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 133 5212 KHASIMI CC OCT 2022 0.00 387.17101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 133 5301 KHASIMI CC OCT 2022 0.00 411.11101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 121 5216 KANDEL CC OCT 2022 0.00 500.00101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 133 5224 KHASIMI CC OCT 2022 0.00 536.89101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 401 5303 WEIRICK CC OCT 2022 0.00 643.70101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 201 5215 WYATT CC OCT 2022 0.00 687.63101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 301 5215 MADALONE CC OCT 202 0.00 909.35101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 301 5291 PD TRAVEL CC OCT 20 0.00 927.08101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 421 5301 CLARK CC OCT 2022 0.00 971.44101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 421 5361 CLARK CC OCT 2022 0.00 1,028.04101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 121 5215 HARVEY CC OCT 2022 0.00 1,413.64101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 131 5221 HANNAH CC OCT 2022 0.00 1,520.28101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 301 5215 SANTOS CC OCT 2022 0.00 1,732.54101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 101 5211 FRANCIS CC OCT 2022 0.00 1,835.97101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 121 5236 LIVIAN CC OCT 2022 0.00 2,505.36101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 301 5215 PD TRAVEL CC OCT 20 0.00 3,774.51TOTAL CHECK 0.00 22,539.57101 104557 11/28/22 9814 ROGERS JOSEPH O’DON 111 5205 LEGAL SERVICES 0.00 7,178.00101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 121 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 10,000.00101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 503 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 10,166.67101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 131 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 11,500.00101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 401 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 11,583.33101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 201 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 13,833.33101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 505 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 18,583.33101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 351 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 99,750.00 PG CC 12/21/22
42 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 22
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 01 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 301 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 118,603.25101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 513 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 250.00101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 101 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 500.00101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 133 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 2,583.33101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 502 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 2,916.67101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 501 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 3,583.33101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 421 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 5,416.67TOTAL CHECK 0.00 309,269.91101 V112222 11/22/22 9196 DIANNE LYLE 421 5208 DANCE CLASSES 0.00 886.51101 V112322 11/23/22 7708 BENJAMIN JENNINGS H 121 5261 ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION 0.00 139.99101 V112322 11/23/22 7708 BENJAMIN JENNINGS H 121 5428 CELL PHONE REIMB AU 0.00 122.33101 V112322 11/23/22 7708 BENJAMIN JENNINGS H 121 5428 CELL PHONE REIMB NO 0.00 126.79101 V112322 11/23/22 7708 BENJAMIN JENNINGS H 121 5428 CELL PHONE REIMB OC 0.00 126.79101 V112322 11/23/22 7708 BENJAMIN JENNINGS H 121 5428 CELL PHONE REIMB SE 0.00 126.90TOTAL CHECK 0.00 642.80101 V112324 11/23/22 2987 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 201 5202 CONTRACT PLANNING S 0.00 15,180.00101 V1110221 11/10/22 8974 ALENA RACHELLE WAGR 421 5208 BALLET CLASSES 0.00 514.50TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 1,759,262.38TOTAL FUND 0.00 1,759,262.38 PG CC 12/21/22
43 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 23
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 07 − LIBRARY BLDG & EQUIP FUNDCASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104277 11/10/22 8532 CROZIER STUDIOS 402 5291 ART CURATION/INSTAL 0.00 6,440.00TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 6,440.00TOTAL FUND 0.00 6,440.00 PG CC 12/21/22
44 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 24
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 08 − MUSEUM IMPROVEMENT FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104534 11/23/22 9793 SIGNATURE GLASS & W 412 6021 WINDOW REPLACEMENT− 0.00 1,383.00101 104534 11/23/22 9793 SIGNATURE GLASS & W 412 6021 WINDOW REPLACEMENT− 0.00 9,600.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 10,983.00TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 10,983.00TOTAL FUND 0.00 10,983.00 PG CC 12/21/22
45 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 25
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 09 − DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICCASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104520 11/23/22 2028 PACIFIC GROVE CHAMB 103 5201 BID MAR−NOV 2022 0.00 23,281.89TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 23,281.89TOTAL FUND 0.00 23,281.89 PG CC 12/21/22
46 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 26
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 10 − HOSPITALITY IMPRVMT DIST.CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104399 11/10/22 1788 MONTEREY COUNTY CON 104 5201 HID JULY−SEPT 0.00 71,455.80101 104408 11/10/22 2028 PACIFIC GROVE CHAMB 104 5201 HID JULY−SEPT 0.00 71,455.79TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 142,911.59TOTAL FUND 0.00 142,911.59 PG CC 12/21/22
47 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 27
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 12 − FIRE EMERG EQUIP FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104466 11/23/22 3400 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, 355 5309 MEDICAL SUPPLIES 0.00 3,541.13101 104466 11/23/22 3400 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, 355 5309 MEDICAL SUPPLIES 0.00 9.77TOTAL CHECK 0.00 3,550.90101 104546 11/23/22 7563 VIA HEART PROJECT 355 5371 LIFEPACK CR BATTERY 0.00 180.30TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 3,731.20TOTAL FUND 0.00 3,731.20 PG CC 12/21/22
48 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 28
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 15 − HOUSING FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 204 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 916.67101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 204 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 916.67TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 1,833.34TOTAL FUND 0.00 1,833.34 PG CC 12/21/22
49 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 29
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 18 − GAS TAX FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 508 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 1,833.33101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 508 5222 FOREST AVE & SUNSET 0.00 33.16101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 508 5222 FOREST AVE & SUNSET 0.00 13.26101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 508 5222 FOREST AV & SUNSET 0.00 18.59101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 508 5222 19TH & SUNSET DR. 0.00 17.58101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 508 5222 FOREST AV & SUNSET 0.00 −31.06101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 508 5222 19TH & SUNSET DR. 0.00 0.51TOTAL CHECK 0.00 52.04101 104308 11/10/22 2635 TAMC 508 5331 CONTRIBUTION FY 22/ 0.00 4,925.00101 104445 11/23/22 8890 4LEAF 508 5201 FY22/23 ON−CALL TRA 0.00 3,993.75101 104469 11/23/22 467 CALTRANS 508 5331 SIGNALS & LIGHTING 0.00 728.03101 104537 11/23/22 1768 STURDY OIL COMPANY 508 5311 FUEL DIST OCT 2022 0.00 521.49101 104542 11/23/22 9148 TRI COUNTY CONCRETE 508 5331 OVB CONCRETE WORK 0.00 405.09101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 508 5222 ST FUND 50% 0.00 240.81101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 508 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 1,833.33TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 14,532.87TOTAL FUND 0.00 14,532.87 PG CC 12/21/22
50 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 30
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 24 − STILLWELL CHILDREN’S POOLCASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104268 11/10/22 106 AMERICAN SUPPLY COM 425 5309 POOL CLEANING 0.00 445.88TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 445.88TOTAL FUND 0.00 445.88 PG CC 12/21/22
51 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 31
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 27 − LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 413 5222 ASILOMAR BLVD PG LH 0.00 5.06101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 413 5222 ASILOMAR BLVD PG LH 0.00 −57.84TOTAL CHECK 0.00 −52.78101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 413 5223 LIGHTHOUSE SUPPLIES 0.00 18.56101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 413 5223 LIGHTHOUSE SUPPLIES 0.00 14.72101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 413 5223 LIGHTHOUSE SUPPLIES 0.00 2.60TOTAL CHECK 0.00 35.88101 104453 11/23/22 8330 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 413 5223 BOOKS FOR GIFTSHOP 0.00 167.04101 104453 11/23/22 8330 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV 413 5223 BOOKS FOR GIFTSHOPS 0.00 55.68TOTAL CHECK 0.00 222.72101 104460 11/23/22 5363 AT&T CALNET 3 413 5212 CH GEN ALM LINE 0.00 24.68101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 413 5222 90 ASILOMAR 0.00 63.90TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 294.40TOTAL FUND 0.00 294.40 PG CC 12/21/22
52 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 32
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 40 − POETRY PROMOTION FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104299 11/10/22 3884 GARY A BALEY 405 5291 POETRY PROMOTION 0.00 200.00101 104556 11/23/22 4943 US BANK 405 5291 GODWIN CC OCT 2022 0.00 167.69101 V1110223 11/10/22 9604 DANIEL B. SUMMERHIL 405 5291 PEOTRY PROMOTION 11 0.00 800.00TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 1,167.69TOTAL FUND 0.00 1,167.69 PG CC 12/21/22
53 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 33
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 41 − YOUNT INCOME FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 510 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 166.67101 104392 11/10/22 9506 DUDEK 510 6031 GWP MANAMGENET PLAN 0.00 311.25101 104392 11/10/22 9506 DUDEK 510 6031 GWP MANAMGENET PLAN 0.00 2,396.25TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2,707.50101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 510 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 166.67TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 3,040.84TOTAL FUND 0.00 3,040.84 PG CC 12/21/22
54 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 34
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 43 − SLESF FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 V112323 11/23/22 9033 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 304 5225 LEASED VEHICLES 0.00 2,135.37101 V112323 11/23/22 9033 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 304 5225 LEASED VEHICLES 0.00 2,135.37TOTAL CHECK 0.00 4,270.74TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 4,270.74TOTAL FUND 0.00 4,270.74 PG CC 12/21/22
55 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 35
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 46 − STRONG DISBURSEMENT FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104385 11/10/22 9444 BUREAU VERITAS TECH 461 6021 CIP20−19 FINAL INV 0.00 3,777.50TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 3,777.50TOTAL FUND 0.00 3,777.50 PG CC 12/21/22
56 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 36
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 63 − CAPITAL IMPROV PROJ FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104513 11/23/22 1896 NEILL ENGINEERS COR 631 6041 CIP23−01 0.00 23,650.00101 104513 11/23/22 1896 NEILL ENGINEERS COR 631 6041 CIP22−01 0.00 2,562.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 26,212.00101 104551 11/23/22 9401 WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN, 631 6021 PW CONST. TRAILER L 0.00 1,225.46101 104553 11/23/22 9325 ZANDER DESIGN 631 6031 POINT PINOS CONSTRU 0.00 640.00TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 28,077.46TOTAL FUND 0.00 28,077.46 PG CC 12/21/22
57 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 37
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 70 − EMP BENEFIT FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 703 5123 ADMIN FEE 0.00 200.00101 104414 11/10/22 1 CALPERS HEALTH 703 5123 NOV 2022 PREMIUMS 0.00 6,037.77101 104416 11/10/22 9360 STANDARD INSURANCE 703 5234 OCT 2022 PREMIUMS 0.00 5,643.36101 104418 11/14/22 8211 STANDARD INSURANCE 703 5123 NOV 2022 PREMIUMS 0.00 2,463.12101 104558 11/28/22 5025 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPM 703 5235 3RD QTR 2022 0.00 213.00101 V1110222 11/10/22 9163 CLAREMONT BEHAVIORA 703 5213 SEPTEMBER 2022 0.00 648.15101 V1110222 11/10/22 9163 CLAREMONT BEHAVIORA 703 5123 OCTOBER 2022 0.00 648.15101 V1110222 11/10/22 9163 CLAREMONT BEHAVIORA 703 5123 NOVEMBER 2022 0.00 648.15TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,944.45TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 16,501.70TOTAL FUND 0.00 16,501.70 PG CC 12/21/22
58 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 38
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 71 − WORKERS COMP FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 701 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 666.67101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 701 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 666.67TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 1,333.34TOTAL FUND 0.00 1,333.34 PG CC 12/21/22
59 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 39
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 72 − LIABILITY INS FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 702 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 500.00101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 702 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 500.00TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 1,000.00TOTAL FUND 0.00 1,000.00 PG CC 12/21/22
60 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 40
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 74 − LOCAL WATER PROJECT CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104406 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 741 5222 LWP 9/29−10/27 0792 0.00 9,202.50101 104409 11/10/22 7716 PERC WATER CORPORAT 741 5201 FY22/23 LWP O&M 0.00 26,384.84101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 741 5222 1313 OCEAN VIEW BLV 0.00 939.87TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 36,527.21TOTAL FUND 0.00 36,527.21 PG CC 12/21/22
61 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 41
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 75 − CEMETERY FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 601 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 1,333.33101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 601 5222 CEMETERY 0.00 −30.70101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 601 5222 CREST & RIPPLE 0.00 18.84101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 601 5222 CEMETERY − 1% 0.00 20.61TOTAL CHECK 0.00 8.75101 104279 11/10/22 926 EWING IRRIGATION PR 601 5309 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 0.00 78.25101 104279 11/10/22 926 EWING IRRIGATION PR 601 5309 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 0.00 15.45TOTAL CHECK 0.00 93.70101 104283 11/10/22 1199 HAYWARD LUMBER COMP 601 5309 CEMETERY SUPPLIES 0.00 194.62101 104283 11/10/22 1199 HAYWARD LUMBER COMP 601 5309 CEMETERY SUPPLIES 0.00 64.95101 104283 11/10/22 1199 HAYWARD LUMBER COMP 601 5309 CEMETERY SUPPLIES 0.00 63.71101 104283 11/10/22 1199 HAYWARD LUMBER COMP 601 5309 CEMETERY SUPPLIES 0.00 110.54101 104283 11/10/22 1199 HAYWARD LUMBER COMP 601 5309 CEMETERY SUPPLIES 0.00 36.93TOTAL CHECK 0.00 470.75101 104284 11/10/22 4321 HOME DEPOT CREDIT S 601 5309 WIRE ROPE 0.00 34.94101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 601 5309 CEMETERY SUPPLIES 0.00 93.92101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 601 5309 CEMETERY SUPPLIES 0.00 32.76101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 601 5309 CEMETERY SUPPLIES 0.00 5.45101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 601 5309 CEMETERY SUPPLIES 0.00 9.82TOTAL CHECK 0.00 141.95101 104388 11/10/22 7679 CA ASSOCIATION OF P 601 5291 MEMBERSHIP 0.00 299.00101 104398 11/10/22 9798 LYNNE FONDA 601 5502 BURIAL SITES 0.00 3,368.40101 104413 11/10/22 5629 WHITED CEMETERY SER 601 5309 LINERS 0.00 3,466.00101 104497 11/23/22 3521 KIMBALL MIDWEST 601 5309 TOOLS 0.00 59.60101 104503 11/23/22 9812 MICHAEL CLARKSON 601 5502 BURIAL SITE 0.00 1,684.20101 104515 11/23/22 9576 O’REILLY AUTO ENTER 601 5227 UNIT CEM 68 0.00 16.37101 104537 11/23/22 1768 STURDY OIL COMPANY 601 5311 FUEL DIST OCT 2022 0.00 23.61101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 601 5222 1254 DELMONTECEM70% 0.00 226.39101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 601 5222 CEM 4% 0.00 19.26TOTAL CHECK 0.00 245.65101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 601 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 1,333.33TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 12,579.58TOTAL FUND 0.00 12,579.58 PG CC 12/21/22
62 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 42
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 76 − SEWER FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104265 11/03/22 2133 PERS 611 5145 OCT 2022 UAL 0.00 10,416.67101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 PUMP SUNSET ARENA 0.00 11.57101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 520 OCEAN VIEW BLVD 0.00 12.42101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 471 OCEAN VIEW BL. 0.00 19.17101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 EARDLEY PUMP #1 0.00 39.28101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 PUMP 17TH & OCNVW 0.00 44.49101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 EARDLEY PUMP #1 0.00 48.74101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 17TH & OCNVW 0.00 52.07101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 360 OCEAN VIEW BLVD 0.00 100.43101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 471 OCEAN VIEW BL. 0.00 −30.14101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 PUMP RUSSELL SVC CT 0.00 8.70101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 OCEANVIEW BLVD & 8T 0.00 6.13101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 1996 SUNSET DR. 0.00 6.30101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 PUMP STATION 0.00 −56.73101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 PUMP RUSSELL SVC CT 0.00 −36.13101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 O V 9TH PUMP #2 0.00 136.36101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 PUMP SUNSET ARENA 0.00 141.51101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 520 OCEAN VIEW BLVD 0.00 −43.56101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 1996 SUNSET DR. 0.00 −40.39101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 PUMP SUNSET ARENA 0.00 217.63TOTAL CHECK 0.00 637.85101 104294 11/10/22 6239 OWEN EQUIPMENT SALE 611 5227 UNIT 47 0.00 164.39101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 611 5309 SEWER SUPPLIES 0.00 43.69101 104298 11/10/22 2034 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW 611 5309 SEWER SUPPLIES 0.00 37.54TOTAL CHECK 0.00 81.23101 104314 11/10/22 6777 WALLACE GROUP 611 5201 SSMP 5 YEAR UPDATE 0.00 1,989.50101 104392 11/10/22 9506 DUDEK 612 6051 ARCHEOLOGICAL MONIT 0.00 3,557.50101 104394 11/10/22 6679 IWORQ SYSTEMS 611 5201 IWORQ − ANNUAL PERM 0.00 1,887.50101 104406 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 611 5222 PW 0601805126−5 0.00 962.53101 104458 11/23/22 6154 AT&T 611 5212 PW SEWER 237 841−13 0.00 33.97101 104458 11/23/22 6154 AT&T 611 5212 PW SEWER 237 841−13 0.00 33.97101 104458 11/23/22 6154 AT&T 611 5212 PW SEWER 237 841−13 0.00 33.97101 104458 11/23/22 6154 AT&T 611 5212 PW SEWER 237 841−13 0.00 33.97TOTAL CHECK 0.00 135.88101 104488 11/23/22 3378 DON CHAPIN CO., INC 611 5207 FY22/23 SANITARY SE 0.00 802.50101 104488 11/23/22 3378 DON CHAPIN CO., INC 611 5207 FY22/23 SANITARY SE 0.00 1,352.48101 104488 11/23/22 3378 DON CHAPIN CO., INC 611 5207 FY22/23 SANITARY SE 0.00 1,354.62101 104488 11/23/22 3378 DON CHAPIN CO., INC 611 5207 FY22/23 SANITARY SE 0.00 1,365.32101 104488 11/23/22 3378 DON CHAPIN CO., INC 611 5207 FY22/23 SANITARY SE 0.00 2,037.28101 104488 11/23/22 3378 DON CHAPIN CO., INC 611 5207 FY22/23 SANITARY SE 0.00 2,088.64101 104488 11/23/22 3378 DON CHAPIN CO., INC 611 5207 FY22/23 SANITARY SE 0.00 2,328.32101 104488 11/23/22 3378 DON CHAPIN CO., INC 611 5207 FY22/23 SANITARY SE 0.00 2,468.49101 104488 11/23/22 3378 DON CHAPIN CO., INC 611 5207 FY22/23 SANITARY SE 0.00 2,743.48 PG CC 12/21/22
63 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 43
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 76 − SEWER FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104488 11/23/22 3378 DON CHAPIN CO., INC 611 5207 FY22/23 SANITARY SE 0.00 3,346.96101 104488 11/23/22 3378 DON CHAPIN CO., INC 611 5207 FY22/23 SANITARY SE 0.00 3,483.92101 104488 11/23/22 3378 DON CHAPIN CO., INC 611 5207 FY22/23 SANITARY SE 0.00 3,839.16101 104488 11/23/22 3378 DON CHAPIN CO., INC 611 5207 FY22/23 SANITARY SE 0.00 4,205.10101 104488 11/23/22 3378 DON CHAPIN CO., INC 611 5207 FY22/23 SANITARY SE 0.00 4,530.38101 104488 11/23/22 3378 DON CHAPIN CO., INC 611 5207 FY22/23 SANITARY SE 0.00 4,893.11TOTAL CHECK 0.00 40,839.76101 104489 11/23/22 3409 GREEN RUBBER−KENNED 611 5309 BALL VALVE 0.00 76.82101 104489 11/23/22 3409 GREEN RUBBER−KENNED 611 5309 SPRAY GUN 0.00 190.07TOTAL CHECK 0.00 266.89101 104510 11/23/22 1786 MONTEREY PENINSULA 611 5201 SEWER WORK BALBOA&O 0.00 3,875.00101 104512 11/23/22 2986 MUNICIPAL MAINTENAN 611 5227 UNIT 47 0.00 102.17101 104513 11/23/22 1896 NEILL ENGINEERS COR 612 6051 CIP22−01 0.00 1,830.00101 104513 11/23/22 1896 NEILL ENGINEERS COR 612 6051 CIP23−01 0.00 2,714.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 4,544.00101 104515 11/23/22 9576 O’REILLY AUTO ENTER 611 5227 UNIT 47 0.00 226.44101 104526 11/23/22 2219 PURE WATER 611 5309 WATER SVC 0.00 24.65101 104537 11/23/22 1768 STURDY OIL COMPANY 611 5311 FUEL DIST OCT 2022 0.00 316.03101 104552 11/23/22 2894 WILSON’S PLUMBING & 611 5291 PLUMBING SVC 245 OV 0.00 409.29101 104552 11/23/22 2894 WILSON’S PLUMBING & 611 5291 PLUMBING SVC 245 OV 0.00 409.29TOTAL CHECK 0.00 818.58101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 611 5222 1273 CRESPI POND 50 0.00 62.22101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 611 5222 100 OCEANVW IRRIG 0.00 38.38101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 611 5222 SEWER 8% 0.00 38.53TOTAL CHECK 0.00 139.13101 104581 11/30/22 2133 PERS 611 5145 NOV 2022 UAL 0.00 10,416.67101 V112324 11/23/22 2987 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 612 6051 IS/MND −PHASE 9 CIP 0.00 7,987.50TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 89,389.87TOTAL FUND 0.00 89,389.87 PG CC 12/21/22
64 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 44
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 77 − GOLF FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 625 5802 77 ASILOMAR − LOAN 0.00 294.94101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 621 5222 1313 OCEAN VIEW BLV 0.00 6.84101 104266 11/10/22 2024 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 621 5222 1313 OCEAN VIEW BLV 0.00 38.57TOTAL CHECK 0.00 340.35101 104407 11/10/22 7474 PACIFIC GROVE CAPIT 622 6061 2020/Q4 COURSECO 0.00 10,922.31101 104407 11/10/22 7474 PACIFIC GROVE CAPIT 622 6061 2018/Q3 COURSECO 0.00 12,531.31101 104407 11/10/22 7474 PACIFIC GROVE CAPIT 622 6061 2020/Q3 COURSECO 0.00 14,934.43101 104407 11/10/22 7474 PACIFIC GROVE CAPIT 622 6061 2020/Q1 COURSECO 0.00 6,757.64101 104407 11/10/22 7474 PACIFIC GROVE CAPIT 622 6061 2020/Q2 COURSECO 0.00 8,529.31101 104407 11/10/22 7474 PACIFIC GROVE CAPIT 622 6061 2018/Q4 COURSECO 0.00 8,658.43TOTAL CHECK 0.00 62,333.43101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 625 5222 77 ASILOMAR GOLF HS 0.00 1,375.15101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 621 5222 1273 CRESPI POND 50 0.00 62.23101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 621 5222 77 ASILOMAR FIRE SV 0.00 79.79101 104554 11/23/22 438 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 621 5222 1254 DELMONTEGOLF30 0.00 97.02TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,614.19TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 64,287.97TOTAL FUND 0.00 64,287.97 PG CC 12/21/22
65 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 45
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 84 − AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN−ARPACASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104448 11/23/22 9806 AIR EXCHANGE, INC 841 6021 RETROFIT FIRE DEPAR 0.00 18,177.74101 104467 11/23/22 9704 BOWMAN CONSULTING G 841 6031 PURPLE PIPE FEASIBI 0.00 8,482.50101 104513 11/23/22 1896 NEILL ENGINEERS COR 841 6041 CIP23−21 0.00 4,708.00TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 31,368.24TOTAL FUND 0.00 31,368.24 PG CC 12/21/22
66 of 332
SUPERION PAGE NUMBER: 46
DATE: 12/12/2022 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ACCTPA21TIME: 16:29:36 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUNDSELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date between ’20221101 00:00:00.000’ and ’20221130 00:00:00.000’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/23 FUND − 93 − KOO ESTATE DONATION CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DIVISION ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT101 104486 11/23/22 9542 GHD INC 931 6031 LP PIER PROJECT − F 0.00 41,503.80TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 41,503.80TOTAL FUND 0.00 41,503.80TOTAL REPORT 0.00 2,298,542.49 PG CC 12/21/22
67 of 332
Agenda No. 8 B
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Audrey Cray, Finance & Risk Manager
MEETING DATE: December 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Core Revenue Report for November 2022
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Receive the Core Revenue Report for November 2022.
DISCUSSION
The City of Pacific Grove’s General Fund revenues are primarily derived from Property Tax, Transient Occupancy Tax, and Sales and Use Tax revenues. In the Fiscal Year 22/23 Adopted Budget, these three revenue sources were estimated to generate $20.3 million. These revenues account for approximately 70% of the General Fund's on-going revenues.
Details on the budgeted amounts and revenues to date are included in Attachments 1.
OPTIONS
N/A - This is informational only.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with receiving this report.
GOAL ALIGNMENT: Financial Stability: Develop a strategic plan to better address current and future City expenditure and revenue needs.
Attachments
Core Revenue Report November 2022
PG CC 12/21/22
68 of 332
Core Revenue Report
Fiscal Year 2022/23 - November 2022
The following tables include the FY22/23 budget and year to date revenues. The receipts represent funds received to date.
PROPERTY TAX
Property Tax is the first largest source of the General Fund revenue. The City typically receives property tax payments in December, April, and June. Unlike other tax revenues, property taxes were not impacted by COVID-19. The following table presents Fiscal Year 2022/23 budget, and revenues received to date.
Property Tax Adopted Budget YTD Receipts % of Adopted Budget FY22/23 8,840,000 - 0.0%
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX (TOT)
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is the General Fund’s second largest source of revenue which the City receives on a monthly basis. Unlike property taxes, TOT was significantly impacted by COVID-19 in Fiscal Years 2019/20 and 2020/21. The following table presents Fiscal Year 2022/23 budget and revenues received to date.
Transient Occupancy Tax Adopted Budget YTD Receipts % of Adopted Budget FY22/23 5,867,000 2,846,053 49%
The City receives transient occupancy tax in the month following the stay. The revenues received in November are for the October lodging period.
The following table shows a monthly breakdown of TOT revenues when compared to the same month last year. The reduction in the 2020/21 TOT in December and January primarily resulted from temporary COVID-19 restrictions.
Lodging Period 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 Net Difference
July (1) 289,435 673,475 797,756 124,281
August 340,019 730,578 818,939 88,361
September 327,958 578,129 639,644 61,515
October 347,103 475,290 589,714 114,424
November 216,516 431,862 - -
December 90,066 378,655 - -
January 109,118 314,248 - -
February 205,512 412,711 - -
March 334,004 476,041 - -
April 379,613 568,275 - -
May 428,612 612,496 - -
June 518,002 621,212 - -
Total 3,585,958 6,272,972 2,846,053 388,581
November 2022 revenues are anticipated to be received in late December.
PG CC 12/21/22
69 of 332
SALES AND USE TAX
Sales and Use tax are the third largest source of the City’s General Fund revenues. The City receives a 1% Bradley Burns Tax and a 1% Measure U Transactions and Use Tax.
The Fiscal Year 22/23 Adopted Budget reflects the addition of Measure A revenues, a 0.50% Transactions and Use Tax. This tax becomes effective on October 1, 2022. Three quarters of Measure A funds have been incorporated into the annual projections. The first Measure A revenues will not be received until the end of December. These revenues should appear on this report in January 2023.
The impact of COVID-19 on the Sales and Use tax revenues was less significant when compared to TOT.
The following table presents Fiscal Year 22/23 budget and revenues received to date.
Sales and Use Tax Adopted Budget YTD Receipts % of Adopted Budget FY22/23 5,616,000 1,190,768 21.2%
The following table presents Fiscal Year 2022/23 budget and revenues received to date.
Lodging Period 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 Net Difference
July Advance 358,945 303,144 350,801 47,657
August Advance 427,105 507,200 364,694 (142,506)
September True-up 243,269 287,224 475,273 188,049)
October Advance 343,188 311,118 - -
November Advance 333,869 324,181 - -
December True-up 302,359 479,810 - -
January Advance 281,830 260,937 - -
February Advance 339,550 316,738 - -
March True-up 239,864 471,617 - -
April Advance 314,606 329,326 - -
May Advance 395,212 436,035 - -
June True-Up 481,058 513,452 - -
4,060,855 4,540,782 1,190,768 93,200
November 2022 payments are anticipated to be received in late December as the State pays the City two months in arrears
PG CC 12/21/22
70 of 332
Agenda No. 9 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ben Harvey, City Manager
MEETING DATE: December 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Ratification of New Local Emergency Actions
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Receive report of emergency directives/modifications.
DISCUSSION
The City Manager during this Local Emergency is authorized to directly mitigate effects of the Local Emergency to protect life or property.
This report apprises the City Council of emergency directives taken under the continuing local emergency proclaimed by Resolution 20-007. This report fulfills the City Council’s review obligation under that Resolution and Government Code 8630. This agenda item also enables ratification of select actions taken since the City Council’s last review.
City expenditures for legal services related to COVID-19 issues (specifically to related to COVID 19-COM (Communications); COVID 19-TRN (Training); COVID 19-LAW (Legal Support); and COVID-19 (Other)) are eligible for State and Federal Emergency Service reimbursement, including but not limited to FEMA or other emergency grant funding.
Actions not subject to Ratification. Since the time of the revised Monterey County Shelter in Place Order issued Friday, April 3, 2020, the City Manager has taken the following new or modified actions pursuant to the Emergency Proclamation:
None to report at this time.
No action is necessary with respect to the above new or modified measures, as each is responsive to requirements of the revised Monterey County Shelter in Place Order falling within the regular management discretion of the City Manager.
Actions subject to Ratification. Certain mitigation measures that have been enacted by the City Manager in response to the Monterey County Shelter in Place Order issued Friday, May 8, 2020, and in accord with Council’s Local Emergency under Article 19, subparagraph l, of the Pacific Grove City Charter, and Chapter 3.20 of the Pacific Grove Municipal Code (PGMC), are subject to ratification.
Any mitigation measures that qualify are subject to ratification as required by Government Code 8630 and City Council Resolution 20-007, and are listed below:
PG CC 12/21/22
71 of 332
and City Council Resolution 20-007, and are listed below:
1. None to report at this time.
Discussion of Circumstances Needing Emergency Response. The discussion part of this item allows comment on circumstances which may benefit from further or different emergency responses. Matters identified will be referred to the City Manager for appropriate consideration in accord with the Emergency Management System protocols set by PGMC Chapter 3.20. These delegate exclusive emergency management response authority to the City Manager.
CEQA Exemption. Actions taken to prevent or mitigate an emergency are exempt from CEQA pursuant to section 15260 of the CEQA Guidelines.
OPTIONS
Actions not subject to ratification are reported for information only.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no financial impact in receiving the report.
GOAL ALIGNMENT: Not Applicable.
PG CC 12/21/22
72 of 332
Agenda No. 9 B
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney
MEETING DATE: December 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Legal Services Agreement with Renee Public Law Group CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Motion to authorize the Mayor to sign a Legal Services Agreement with Renee Public Law Group.
DISCUSSION
The attached proposed Legal Services Agreement is with the Renee Public Law Group which is available to provided legal services to the City regarding labor, employment and related legal services.
This Legal Services Agreement would be effective from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 and shall not exceed $90,000.
OPTIONS
Do not approve the proposed Legal Services Agreement with the Renee Public Law Group FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The funds to support this contract have not been included in the Fiscal Year 22/23 Budget. Prior to any mid-year adjustments, the Fiscal Year 22/23 estimated ending General Fund balance is anticipated to be approximately $10.5 million; with the amount available above reserve policy levels projected at $376,000. It is anticipated there will be sufficient funds available to cover the contract costs of up to $90,000.
If this item is approved, an ordinance will be brought forward at the next Council Meeting to amend the budget.
GOAL ALIGNMENT: Not Applicable.
Attachments
Legal Services Agreement with Renee Public Law Group
PG CC 12/21/22
73 of 332
350 Sansome Street | Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
302362.2
Jenica Maldonado
415-848-7200
[email protected]
December 15, 2022
Sent Via Email to [email protected]
Bill Peake
Mayor
City of Pacific Grove
300 Forest Ave
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
Brian Pierik
City Attorney
City of Pacific Grove
300 Forest Ave
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
Re: City of Pacific Grove
Legal Services Agreement, effective January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023
Dear Mayor Peake & City Attorney Pierik:
Thank you for retaining Renne Public Law Group (“RPLG”) to provide legal services on behalf of the City of Pacific Grove. We appreciate the opportunity to serve as Special Outside Legal Counsel and look forward to working with you on this matter.
This Legal Services Agreement (“Agreement”) sets forth our agreement concerning the legal services we will provide and our fee and expense reimbursement arrangements for those services. This Agreement supersedes the parties’ prior Legal Services Agreement, dated July 14, 2022. Please read the entire Agreement before signing and returning it to us.
1. Term. This Agreement is effective as of January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 unless extended by the parties, and is subject to a Not to Exceed of $90,000, unless approved by the City Council.
2. Scope of Engagement. This Agreement authorizes RPLG to provide the City with legal advice relating to labor, employment, and related government legal services, as assigned by the City Council or the City Attorney. I will serve as the primary attorney providing legal work in connection with such services. Our work is limited to such services. If we are requested to and agree to provide legal services on other discrete matters unrelated to labor, employment, or related government legal services, we will confirm the engagement and bill separately for such services.
PG CC 12/21/22
74 of 332
350 Sansome Street | Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
302362.2
3. Fees and Personnel. As compensation for our services, my hourly fee at Partner Rate will be $405. To the extent required, we will bill other members of my firm at the following hourly rates: Managing Partner, Jon Holtzman at $425; Of Counsel and Senior Counsel at $385; Associates at $295, Paralegals at $180, and Consultants at $215 to $300. Rates will generally be increased annually on January 1 by the greater of 3% or the relevant local CPI increase over the prior 12-month period, rounded to the nearest $5.
In the unlikely event of a dispute over fees, the parties agree that the dispute will be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the State Bar’s Mandatory Fee Arbitration Program.
4. Billing and Payment Responsibilities. We will send monthly statements which are due within 30 days of receipt. If you have any questions about an invoice, please promptly telephone or write me so that we may discuss these matters. Billing is done in 1/10ths of an hour increments.
In addition, the firm charges separately for certain costs incurred in the representation, as well as for any disbursements to third parties made on a client’s behalf. Such costs and disbursements include, for example, the following: travel (at the IRS rate in effect at the time the travel occurs), computer-assisted research, transcription, overnight delivery and messenger services. For major disbursements to third parties, invoices may be sent directly to you for payment. The firm also bills for time spent traveling on a client’s behalf at our normal hourly rates.
Our Statement of Fee and Billing Information, which sets forth the details of our disbursement and expense policy, is attached.
5. Contract Duration and Termination of Services. This Agreement is effective January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023, subject to extension based upon the mutual written agreement of the parties. You may terminate RPLG’s services at any time by written notice. After receiving such notice, we will cease providing services. We will cooperate with you in the orderly transfer of all related files and records to your new counsel.
RPLG may terminate its services for any reason upon reasonable written notice, consistent with the Rules of Professional Responsibility. If we terminate our services, you agree to execute a substitution of attorneys promptly and otherwise cooperate in effecting that termination.
Termination of our services, whether by you or by us, will not relieve the obligation to pay for services rendered and costs incurred before our services formally ceased.
6. No Guarantee of Outcome. Any comments made by us about the potential outcome of this matter are expressions of opinion only and are not guarantees or promises about any outcome or results.
PG CC 12/21/22
75 of 332
350 Sansome Street | Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
302362.2
7. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the law as applicable.
8. Entire Agreement; Full Understanding; Modifications in Writing. This letter contains our entire agreement about our representation. Any modifications or additions to this Agreement must be made in writing.
9. Joint Representation. Our firm maintains Of Counsel agreements with certain legal specialists. Because these individuals are deemed independent contractors under the applicable provisions of the tax laws and not employees of the firm, it is necessary that you consent to dual representation by the firm and the specialist in the event the matter which you have engaged us to handle requires the use of that specialist. This arrangement has no effect whatsoever on the cost of your legal services, rather it is an ethical requirement that we disclose this fact and that you consent. You are consenting by signing this letter.
It is our pleasure to have the opportunity to serve the City of Pacific Grove. We look forward to working with you.
Very truly yours,
Jenica Maldonado
Partner
Approved:
Jonathan Holtzman
Managing Partner
Attachment: Statement of Fee and Billing Information
cc: Angie Perez
RPLG Billing Department
These terms are accepted and agreed to as of the date of this letter.
Print Name: Mayor Bill Peake
By:
Date:
PG CC 12/21/22
76 of 332
350 Sansome Street | Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
302362.2
ATTACHMENT A
PUBLIC SECTOR FEE SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE
JANUARY 1, 2022 TO DECEMBER 31, 2022
Partners: $395 - $575
Of Counsel: $350 - $450
Associates: $295 - $350
Law Clerks: $195 - $295
Paralegals: $145 - $225
Analysts: $125 - $275
Consultants: $195 - $475
Our rates adjust by the greater of 3% or the relevant local CPI increase over the prior 12 month period, rounded to the nearest $5.
PG CC 12/21/22
77 of 332
350 Sansome Street | Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
302362.2
ATTACHMENT 2
STATEMENT OF FEE AND BILLING INFORMATION
The following is a general description of our fee and billing policies. These general policies may be modified by the specific engagement letter or agreement to which this summary is attached.
Professional Fees. Our fees for professional services are based on the fair value of the services rendered. To help us determine the value of our services, our attorneys and paralegals maintain time records for each client and matter. Our attorneys and paralegals are assigned hourly rates which are based on years of experience, specialization, training and level of professional attainment. We adjust our rates periodically (usually at the beginning of each year) to take into account inflation and the increased experience of our professional personnel.
To keep professional fees at a minimum, legal work that does not require more experienced attorneys will be performed, where feasible, by attorneys with lower billing rates. Of course, the quality of the work is paramount, and we do not sacrifice quality to economy.
Before undertaking a particular assignment, we will, if requested, provide you with a fee estimate to the extent possible. Estimates are not possible for some matters, however, and cannot be relied on in many others because the scope of our work will not be clear at the outset.
When a fee estimate is given, it is only an estimate; it is not a maximum or minimum fee quotation. The actual fee may be more or less than the quoted estimate.
Billing and Payment Procedures. Unless other arrangements are made at the time of the engagement, invoices will be sent monthly. Invoices for outside services exceeding $100 may be billed separately. Occasionally, however, we may defer billing for a given month or months if the accrued fees and costs do not warrant current billing or if other circumstances would make it appropriate to defer billing.
Our invoices contain a brief narrative description of the work performed; if requested, the initials of the attorney who performed the work will appear on the statement. The invoice will include a line item reflecting in-house administrative costs. The firm’s in-house administrative costs include duplicating, facsimile charges, telephone charges, e-mail, postage, mileage and other administrative expenses.
In addition, the Firm charges separately for certain costs incurred in the representation, as well as for any disbursements to third parties made on a client’s behalf. Such costs and disbursements include, for example, the following: travel (at the IRS rate in effect at the time the travel occurs), computer-assisted research, transcription, overnight delivery and messenger services. For major disbursements to third parties, invoices may be sent directly to you for payment. The Firm also bills for time spent traveling on a client’s behalf at our normal hourly rates.
If you have any questions regarding an invoice, the Billing Coordinator or Accounting Manager is available to answer your questions. For any unresolved matters, the Bar Association has an arbitration mechanism that can be used to resolve such matters.
PG CC 12/21/22
78 of 332
Agenda No. 9 C
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney
MEETING DATE: December 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Agreement with Renee Public Management Group
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Motion to authorize the Mayor to sign Agreement with Renee Public Management Group.
DISCUSSION
The attached proposed Agreement is with the Renee Public Management Group which is available to assist the City with the City Manager performance evaluation and goal setting and strategic planning services.
This Agreement would be effective from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 and shall not exceed $90,000.
OPTIONS
Do not approve the proposed Agreement with the Renee Public Management Group FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The funds to support this contract have not been included in the Fiscal Year 22/23 Budget. Prior to any mid-year adjustments, the Fiscal Year 22/23 estimated ending General Fund balance is anticipated to be approximately $10.5 million; with the amount available above reserve policy levels projected at $376,000. It is anticipated there will be sufficient funds available to cover the contract costs of up to $90,000.
If this item is approved, an ordinance will be brought forward at the next Council Meeting to amend the budget.
GOAL ALIGNMENT: Not Applicable.
Attachments
Agreement with Renee Public Management Group
PG CC 12/21/22
79 of 332
350 Sansome Street | Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
RPMG| City of Pacific Grove Professional Services Agreement 302356.3
December 15, 2022
To: Mayor Bill Peake
City of Pacific Grove
[email protected]
From: Nelson Fialho
Executive Director
Renne Public Management Group
[email protected]
Cc: Brian Pierik, City Attorney
Jenica Maldonado, Partner, RPLG
Re: Professional Services Agreement
Dear Mayor Peake,
Thank you for retaining the Renne Public Law Group LLP, dba Renne Public Management Group (“RPMG”), to provide consulting services for the City of Pacific Grove. We appreciate the opportunity to assist the City with the City Manager performance evaluation facilitation and Goal Setting and Strategic Planning for the City Council.
RPMG is a non-attorney consulting arm wholly owned by Renne Public Law Group, LLP (RPLG).
Although RPLG is a law firm, and some ancillary services under this agreement may on occasion be performed by attorneys, this contract is not for legal services.
The RPMG Team, including Executive Director Nelson Fialho (RPMG), Consultant Wendy Sommer (RPMG) and other staff members from RPMG or RPLG (as reflected in section 3 of this Agreement), will perform the professional consultant services under this agreement. As RPLG’s Managing Partner, Jonathan Holtzman has the authority to bind our firm in a professional service contract agreement. If any amendments, addendum, or alterations to this service agreement were to be made, Jonathan Holtzman or another RPLG partner with signing authority must execute said agreement.
1. Scope of Engagement
City of Pacific Grove (“CLIENT”) seeks the services of RPMG (“CONSULTANT”) for consulting services to assist the City with City Manager performance evaluation facilitation and Goal Setting and Strategic Planning for the City Council.
PG CC 12/21/22
80 of 332
350 Sansome Street | Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
RPMG| City of Pacific Grove Professional Services Agreement 302356.3
2. Terms
This agreement is effective as of January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023, and shall not exceed $90,000. The parties may agree to extend the Not to Exceed amount based upon the mutual written agreement.
3. Fees and Personnel
As compensation for services, our fees are based on our billing rate for the personnel performing services under this agreement at the time such services are rendered. RPMG on occasion relies on RPLG employees to support the provision of consulting services. Nelson Fialho will be primarily responsible for providing City Manager Performance Evaluation consulting services. Wendy Sommer will be primarily responsible for providing Goal Setting and Strategic Planning consulting services. The following RPMG or RPLG team members will work for the City of Pacific Grove under this engagement at the following hourly billing rates:
• Nelson Fialho, Executive Director, $300
• Wendy Sommer, Consultant, $300
• Jake Freitas, Associate Attorney, $295
• Luke Jensen, Senior Analyst, $215
In addition to the above, normal and direct out-of-pocket expenses associated with the project are charged back to the client. Expenses for this assignment would not exceed $9,500, in addition to the $90,000 Not to Exceed amount for this engagement. These expenses include administrative support, supplies, printing, postage, consultant travel (e.g., flights, hotels, meals etc.) for client discussions, meetings, and interviews, as necessary. All expense items are reimbursed “at cost” and detailed and billed monthly. However, CONSULTANT shall not make travel arrangements or incur any additional cost on behalf of CLIENT without prior authorization to incur said expenses.
CONSULTANT will send monthly invoices which are due within 30 days of receipt. As RPMG is a DBA of Renne Public Law Group, LLP, such invoices will be issued by the Renne Public Law Group, LLP. If CLIENT has any questions about an invoice, please promptly contact CONSULTANT so that items can be resolved in a timely manner.
Rates may be increased effective January 1, 2024 and every January 1st thereafter by the greater of 3% or the relevant local CPI increase over the prior 12-month period, rounded to the nearest $5.
4. Contract Duration and Termination of Services.
This agreement will be effective as of January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. CLIENT may terminate this agreement at any time by written notice. After receiving such notice, CONSULTANT PG CC 12/21/22
81 of 332
350 Sansome Street | Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
RPMG| City of Pacific Grove Professional Services Agreement 302356.3
will cease providing services. CONSULTANT will cooperate with the orderly transfer of all related files and records to CLIENT or new CONSULTANT.
CONSULTANT may terminate its services for any reason upon reasonable written notice.
Termination of services, whether by CLIENT or CONSULTANT, will not relieve the obligation to pay for services rendered before our services formally ceased.
5. Laws, Rules and Regulations.
CONSULTANT shall conduct all affairs on behalf of CLIENT in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.
6. Confidentiality.
CONSULTANT agrees to maintain in strict confidence all information supplied by CLIENT to CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT will not disclose any such information to third parties and will use any such information only as authorized by CLIENT. In addition, CONSULTANT will maintain in strict confidence all advice provided to CLIENT.
7. No Guarantee of Outcome.
Any comments made by CONSULTANT about the potential outcome of matter pertaining to scope of services are expressions of opinion only and are not guarantees or promises about any outcome or results.
8. Government Law.
This agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
9. Insurance:
CLIENT is hereby informed that CONSULTANT maintains insurance coverage including but not limited to errors and omissions, umbrella, workers' compensation, and general liability in the event a claim is made against CONSULTANT or against the CLIENT from any act arising from CONSULTANT's advice or services provided pursuant to this agreement. ///
PG CC 12/21/22
82 of 332
350 Sansome Street | Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
RPMG| City of Pacific Grove Professional Services Agreement 302356.3
Jonathan V. Holtzman,
Managing Partner
Renne Public Law Group, LLP ©
10. Entire Agreement; Full Understanding; Modifications in Writing.
This letter contains our entire agreement about our representation. Any modifications or additions to this letter agreement must be made in writing and executed by Jonathan Holtzman or an authorized signatory from the Renne Public Law Group, LLP.
Sincerely,
/s/
Nelson Fialho
Executive Director
Renne Public Management Group
These terms are accepted and agreed to as of the date of this letter.
By (signature): ________________________________________ Date_____________________________________
Print Name: _____________________________
Title: _______________________________________________________________ PG CC 12/21/22
83 of 332
Agenda No. 10 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk/DEI Coordinator
MEETING DATE: December 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Meeting Minutes: November 14, 2022 CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Receive the minutes.
Attachments
DEI Minutes
PG CC 12/21/22
84 of 332
1 MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION
TASK FORCE
REGULAR MEETING
Monday, November 14, 2022, 6:00 P.M.
Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON AND VIRTUALLY (HYBRID).
CHAMBER CAPACITY IS LIMITED AND PROVIDED ON A FIRST COME, FIRST SERVED BASIS.
THE VIRTUAL MEETING IS COMPLIANT WITH THE GOVERNOR’S
EXECUTIVE ORDERS ALLOWING FOR A DEVIATION OF
TELECONFERENCE RULES REQUIRED BY THE BROWN ACT.
JOIN THE ZOOM WEBINAR TO PARTICIPATE LIVE AT:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89179208141
1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
Chair Tina Rau called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm. City Manager Harvey conducted roll call with the following Task Force members present via Zoom Meeting: Task Force Members (Members) Kim Bui, Edward Juárez-Lefèvre, Tina Rau, Nadja Mark and Kristy Markowitz.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Action: Upon motion by Vice Chair Juarez-Lefevre and seconded by Secretary Bui the Task Force approved the Agenda.
Motion carried 5-0, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Members Bui, Juárez-Lefèvre, Marks, Markowitz and Rau.
NOES: None.
3. TASK FORCE AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (City-Related Items Only) Clerk/DEI Coordinator Kandell made an announcement.
Secretary Bui and Member Mark made announcements.
4. COUNCIL LIAISON ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council member Poduri made announcements.
5. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
Public comment was received from Andrew Gonzalez.
6. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
A. Action: Upon motion by Member Mark and seconded by Vice Chair Juárez-Lefèvre, the Task PG CC 12/21/22
85 of 332
2 Force approved corrected Minutes of the October 10, 2022 Regular Meeting, as follows:
Motion carried 5-0 by the following vote:
AYES: Members Bui, Juárez-Lefèvre, Mark, Markowitz and Rau.
NOES: None.
7. REGULAR AGENDA
A. Vision and Goals Subcommittee Update This item was continued from the October 10, 2022 meeting.
Members Mark and Markowitz gave a presentation.
Public comments were received from Andrew Gonzalez and Colleen Ingram.
B. DEI Work Plan Subcommittee
Vice Chair Juárez-Lefèvre and Secretary Bui gave a presentation.
No public comment was received.
C. Task Force Agreements Study Session Recommendations
Vice Chair Juárez-Lefèvre and Secretary Bui gave a presentation.
No public comment was received.
D. Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-16-22
Member Mark gave a presentation.
No public comment was received.
E. DEI Consultant RFQ Update
Clerk/DEI Coordinator Kandell gave a report.
No public comment was received.
8. NEXT MEETING: Regular meeting on December 12, 2022 via Zoom.
9. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Rau adjourned the regular meeting at approximately 7:38 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Kim Bui
Secretary
Approved by Chair: _______________________________Date________________ PG CC 12/21/22
86 of 332
Agenda No. 10 B
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joseph Sidor, Contract Planner
MEETING DATE: December 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes: September 1, 2022 CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Receive the minutes.
Attachments
Approved PC Minutes 09-01-22
PG CC 12/21/22
87 of 332
1 PLANNING COMMISSION
SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
Thursday, September 1, 2022, 6:00 P.M.
Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA This meeting was held in Council Chambers and via Zoom webinar.
1. CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL –Chair Lilley called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm.
Commissioners Present: Aeschliman, Beck, Fredrickson, Lilley, Murphy, Nodzenski (attended remotely), Sawyer.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA –
Chair Lilley asked if any Commissioners wanted to make any changes to the agenda.
On a motion by Commissioner Fredrickson, seconded by Secretary Sawyer, the agenda was unanimously approved on a roll call vote. (7-0)
3. COMMISSION AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (City-Related Items Only) A. Chair Lilley recognized and welcomed Contract City Attorney Brian Pierik.
4. COUNCIL LIAISON ANNOUNCEMENTS - None
5. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT – None
CONSENT AGENDA
6. REPORTS FOR INFORMATION – None
7. REPORTS REQUIRING ACTION - None
REGULAR AGENDA
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None
9. CONTINUED AND ONGOING BUSINESS
A. Create a Subcommittee of the Planning Commission to Review the Parklet Program From: Joseph Sidor, Contract Planner
Zoning District/General Plan Designation: N/A
Coastal Zone: N/A
Historic Resources Inventory: N/A
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
Recommended Action: Create a new Parklet Program Subcommittee, appoint members, and establish a timeframe for the new subcommittee to review the draft Parklet Program PG CC 12/21/22
88 of 332
2 Manual and develop feedback.
Reference: Joseph Sidor, Contract Planner
Chair Lilley introduced the item. John Kuehl, City Building Official, provided an oral report on the current status of the Parklet Program.
Chair Lilley then opened the floor to public comment and the following individuals provided public comment: Liz Jacobs, Julie Vivolo Davis, Michael Scanlon, Jordan Champagne, Lisa Ciani, Inge Lorentzen Daumer, Cari Rotoli, Mike (no last name provided), and Jenny McMurdo.
Chair Lilley closed the public hearing portion of the meeting and returned the item to the Commission for further questions and discussion. The Planning Commissioners recommended the subcommittee review information related to safety, design, permitting requirements, coastal zone permit requirements, dual- or single-track program, maintenance requirements, noticing requirements, definitions, temporary or permanent program, use of Title 23 or Title 15 of the Pacific Grove Municipal Code, and whether to apply the program to all businesses or only restaurants.
Commissioner Fredrickson made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Beck, to form a Parklet Program Subcommittee with three members. Secretary Sawyer proposed a friendly amendment, accepted by both Commissioners Fredrickson and Beck, that the Planning Commission provide direction to the subcommittee (as described above). The motion was unanimously approved as amended on a roll call vote. (7-0) Commissioner Fredrickson made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Aeschliman, to appoint Commissioner Beck, Secretary Sawyer, and Chair Lilley to the subcommittee.
The motion was unanimously approved on a roll call vote. (7-0)
10. NEW BUSINESS - None
11. PRESENTATIONS - None
12. NEXT MEETING – September 8, 2022
13. ADJOURNMENT - By order of the Chair, the meeting was adjourned at 7:00 pm.
PG CC 12/21/22
89 of 332
Agenda No. 12 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joe Amelio, Mayor Pro Tem, Luke Coletti, Councilmember MEETING DATE: December 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Coastal Wildlife Protection Subcommittee Recommendations CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Direct Staff to return to City Council with a Request for Qualifications for consultant services to assist with the proposed Local Coastal Program amendments and corrections.
1. Direct Staff to return to City Council with a comprehensive report describing the use of Community Service Officers to provide wildlife protection and code enforcement services throughout the entire city.
2. Direct the Beautification and Natural Resources Commission to form a standing Wildlife Subcommittee that will provide guidance and oversight regarding wildlife protection issues and code enforcement efforts throughout the entire city.
3. DISCUSSION
Background:
The Coastal Wildlife Protection Advisory Committee was a temporary advisory committee made up of local coastal resource and wildlife experts convened to identify threats to important coastal wildlife. Committee members were told to think big. The goal was to make scientifically based recommendations to help Pacific Grove’s fragile coastal wildlife thrive for years to come. The committee met monthly in 2019, stuck it out through multiple Zoom meetings during COVID, and ultimately presented their recommendations to City Council at its November 3, 2021 meeting. The BNRC considered the CWPAC recommendations at their July 13, 2021 and August 17, 2021 meetings.
Our subcommittee was formed to consider the recommendations from both the Coastal Wildlife Protection Advisory Committee (CWPAC) and Beautification and Natural Resources Commission (BNRC). Our recommended actions ensure the CWPAC and BNRC recommendations are properly implemented. They are in keeping with Pacific Grove’s unique history of protecting wildlife and natural habitat.
Local Coastal Program Amendments:
Fundamentally, the CWPAC Report (Recommendations to Mitigate Identified Threats to PG CC 12/21/22
90 of 332
Fundamentally, the CWPAC Report (Recommendations to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife - Attachment #1) seeks to enhance protections for coastal wildlife, which can only be fully realized (and enforced) by amending our Local Coastal Program (LCP). Our Subcommittee worked with several concerned citizens to consolidate the CWPAC/BNRC recommendations into a list of proposed LCP amendments and corrections (Attachment #2).
The Coastal Commission’s LCP Post-Certification Guide (Attachment #3) provides guidance on the LCP Amendment Process (See Chapter VI).
The Coastal Act and the Commission's Regulations provide certain requirements for LCP amendments. These minimum requirements address the frequency of amendments, public participation during local review, contents of the amendment submittal, procedures for Commission review, and effective date.
Amending a Local Coastal Program is a rigorous process. Due to City staffing constraints an outside consultant should be retained to 1) evaluate the proposed amendments and corrections, and 2) facilitate their adoption. An example RFQ for LCP amendment services is supplied as Attachment #4.
If necessary, local ordinance can be enacted to provide additional protections outside of the LCP framework, e.g., Ordinance 22-018 - Establishing Roadwork Restrictions During the Harbor Seal Pupping Season.
Wildlife Conservation Officer (CWPAC Recommendation #7):
Our subcommittee recommends a Community Service Officer (CSO) position be funded to provide wildlife protection and code enforcement services throughout the entire city. Some suggested monitoring and enforcement responsibilities include: wildlife feeding prohibition, drones in nesting areas, off-leash dogs, off-trail habitat and wildlife disturbance, collecting shells and marine life from beaches and tidepools, litter, watercraft in kelp beds (with resting otters), and disturbing harbor seal rookery areas.
Wildlife Commission (CWPAC Recommendation #7):
The CWPAC and BNRC both recommend the formation of a wildlife commission with an emphasis on coastal wildlife and habitat. Our subcommittee concurs but we also believe the protection of wildlife and habitat is a citywide concern. Therefore, we recommend the BNRC form a standing Wildlife Subcommittee that will provide guidance and oversight regarding wildlife protection issues and code enforcement efforts throughout the entire city.
To maintain a standing subcommittee, the BNRC may need to reestablish the Wildlife Subcommittee on a regular (e.g., annual) basis. The City’s BCC Handbook provides the following:
Subcommittees
Subcommittees may be appointed by Committee vote to accomplish a specific goal within a given timeframe. Subcommittee membership must be less than a quorum. Staff are not members of subcommittees.
GOAL ALIGNMENT
1. Environmental Stewardship
PG CC 12/21/22
91 of 332
2. City Asset Stewardship
OPTIONS
OPTIONS
1. Provide other direction.
2. Take no action.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
FISCAL IMPACT
To be provided by Staff later (see Recommended Actions #1 and #2) GOAL ALIGNMENT: See Goal Alignment within Discussion section.
Attachments
CWPAC Report
Proposed LCP Amendments and Corrections
Coastal Commission LCP Post-Certification Guide
Example RFQ for LCP Amendment Services
PG CC 12/21/22
92 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 1 Recommendations to Mitigate Identified
Threats to Coastal Wildlife
Coastal Wildlife Protection Advisory Committee
City of Pacific Grove
June 8th, 2021
Dedicated to the memory of John Pearse, Professor Emeritus, UC Santa Cruz, colleague, and friend.
PG CC 12/21/22
93 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 2 Table of Contents
Introduction 4
Summary of key recommendations 5
Ongoing disturbance of wildlife 6
Feeding wildlife 6
Drones/Aircraft 6
Domestic pets 7
Beachgoers 7
Kayaks, stand-up paddleboards, etc. 8
Noise 8
Poaching/unlawful resource extraction 9
Pollution 9
Coastal bluff erosion 11
Problematic species 12
Species of Concern needing protection 13
Climate change 15
Areas of Special Interest 18
Hopkins Marine Station Area 20
Lovers Point Area 22
Point Pinos Area 24
Great Tidepool Area 26
Asilomar North 28
Asilomar South 30
Regulations Protecting Wildlife 31
California Code of Regulations, Title 14 31
Pacific Grove Municipal Code 32
Monterey County 32
PG CC 12/21/22
94 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 3 Appendices
Appendix A. Feeding wildlife 34
Appendix B. Recommended protocols for Black Oystercatcher protection 37 Appendix C. Known non-native plants 48
Appendix D. Local conservation organizations 48
Appendix E. Map of state Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) surrounding Pacific Grove 49 Appendix F. Map of Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary 50 Appendix G. Coastal species list 51
References and Resources 56
PG CC 12/21/22
95 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 4 Introduction
The Coastal Wildlife Protection Advisory Committee (CWPAC) was formed as a City Manager advisory committee and recognized by the City Council in December 2018. The formation of CWPAC was motivated by new coastal wildlife protection policies in the City’s 2020 Local Coastal Program. The committee was tasked to advise on collaboration with local agencies and organizations on enforcement, educational outreach, and development guidelines to protect coastal wildlife against significant future disruption of habitat.
CWPAC met 12 times from 2019 - 2021 including a town hall at the Community Center in Pacific Grove in September 2019. Committee members included local scientists and community wildlife advocates who gave generously of their time and efforts. The original members are:
● Thom Akeman, Bay Net volunteer for Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary ● Erika Delemarre, California State Parks' Marine Protected Area Outreach & Education ● Mark Denny, Stanford University/Hopkins Marine Station ● Scott Kathey, formerly Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary ● Blake Matheson, Monterey Audubon Society
● John Pearse, Professor Emeritus, UC Santa Cruz
● Vicki Pearse, Stanford University/Hopkins Marine Station ● Amanda Preece, Monterey Audubon Society
● Bill Standley, Bureau of Land Management
● Kyle S. Van Houtan, Monterey Bay Aquarium
The challenges before us to protect coastal wildlife are large and complex. This document provides guidance and recommendations for the City of Pacific Grove and is a resource for others working to protect our incredibly important local coastal wildlife.
It has been my pleasure to know and work with these talented and dedicated individuals.
Bill Peake, Pacific Grove Mayor
PG CC 12/21/22
96 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 5 Summary of key recommendations
Not listed in order of priority.
1. Decrease human disturbance by reducing access to rocky outcrops and sensitive wildlife breeding areas, both year-round or seasonally, especially in the 6 identified Areas of Special Interest;
2. Remove problematic non-native plants in coastal areas (Appendix C) and replace with native plants, essentially extending the restored Asilomar State Beach dunes and rocky shore habitat north and north-east along the rest of the Pacific Grove shoreline;
3. For coastal development, use soft engineering alternatives (e.g., beach nourishment, dune restoration, etc.) described in the 2012 Evaluation of Erosion Mitigation Alternatives for Southern Monterey Bay instead of hard engineering approaches (e.g., seawalls and riprap) where practicable;
4. Replace lost coastal wildlife habitat through habitat restoration with the goal of no net loss of habitat;
5. Move major infrastructure (e.g., roads, sewer lines, utilities) farther inland from City shorelines in a managed retreat from sea-level rise;
6. Support existing coastal interpretive programs and community science programs (Appendix D) and/or implement additional stewardship and docent programs that foster public understanding and commitment for conservation measures that preserve the City’s native coastal wildlife;
7. Establish and fund a Conservation Officer, as a permanent City position, and/or a dedicated wildlife commission for planning, promoting, executing, and monitoring progress of City strategies for preserving and optimizing the unique coastal wildlife and associated habitats that characterize the City's shoreline.
PG CC 12/21/22
97 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 6 Ongoing disturbance of wildlife
Residents and visitors alike are drawn to the City of Pacific Grove’s rocky shorelines and sandy beaches for recreation, relaxation, research, and more. Famous for its beauty and biodiversity, the City’s coastline is unique in that it is entirely surrounded by a series of four state marine protected areas (MPAs) and the federal Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (see maps in Appendices E and F). Together, these areas offer critical protection to the various habitats and abundant residential and migratory species found along the City’s shoreline and in coastal waters. Though the City’s shoreline is afforded varying levels of federal and state protection, the City of Pacific Grove can enhance these protections in many ways.
Living in the dynamic interface of urban and natural habitats, Pacific Grove’s coastal wildlife are under continual stress and pressure caused by a variety of human impacts. Many adverse impacts to wildlife can be mitigated by changes to policy and human behavior. Disturbance of wildlife interrupts their feeding, breeding, resting, nesting, nursing, and migratory patterns and broadly diminishes the resilience of individual animals. The following is a list of ongoing threats and opportunities for mitigation.
1. Feeding wildlife (see Appendix A)
1. Increase enforcement of City ordinance 10.10.010, which prohibits the feeding of wildlife.
2. Increase awareness of the negative consequences of leaving dog or cat food outside, and the negative impact on wildlife from improperly sealed trash containers.
As carnivorous and omnivorous urban wildlife species increase with supplemental feeding from humans, they prey on other wildlife that do not benefit from human refuse or supplemental feeding, creating an imbalance of predators to prey.
3. Allocate funds for enforcement specific to reducing the feeding of wildlife.
4. Specialized training of Pacific Grove Police Department (PGPD) to increase understanding and enforcement of local and state ordinances that impact wildlife
5. Increase volunteer docent presence - through City of Pacific Grove, Monterey Audubon Society, Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History, Bay Net, Team Ocean, and other groups.
6. Interpretive panels and signage explaining the harm resulting from feeding wildlife - not just enforcement signs.
2. Drones/Aircraft
1. Enforce City ordinance restricting launch of drones within the coastal zone without a City permit. Train City staff and volunteers how to document and report low overflight violations by drones or aircraft and what specific information to record regarding observed wildlife disturbance by such flights.
2. Require permit holders to coordinate with City staff to contact local wildlife monitoring groups prior to flying a drone along the coast, areas including harbor seals, sea otters, sea lions, and black oystercatchers.
PG CC 12/21/22
98 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 7
3. Contact developers of apps that are used by drone operators (B4UFly, others) to get Pacific Grove onto their no-fly maps.
4. Conduct outreach to private drone operators and researchers that use drones regarding impacts to wildlife (Vas et al. 2015, Rebolo-Ifrán et al. 2019)
3. Domestic pets
1. Dogs
a. Require all dog owners applying for a dog license to review wildlife impacts and local leash laws.
b. City police and California State Parks rangers to increase enforcement of leash laws along the entire coastline.
c. Outreach through SPCA for Monterey County, Animal Friends Rescue Project (AFRP), Peace of Mind Dog Rescue, Coastal Canine digital and paper newsletters, and online websites and apps that incorrectly promote Pacific Grove beaches as off-leash. Explain harm done to wildlife by constant disturbance.
2. Cats
a. Free-ranging cats are a major contributor to wildlife mortality. b. Cats transmit Toxoplasmosis, which can be a cause of mortality in Southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis).
c. Outreach through SPCA, AFRP, Peace of Mind, and digital and paper newsletters. Explain harm done to wildlife by free-ranging cats and include the dangers outdoor cats face, including being struck by cars, preyed upon by coyotes, contracting diseases, etc.
d. Cats should be managed like dogs: licensed and only allowed outdoors under supervision, on a harness, or in an enclosure.
4. Beachgoers
1. Fishing
a. Fishing along the entire Pacific Grove coastline is regulated by state and federal law through multiple Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). (See California Code of Regulations, Title 14 and map of local MPAs in Appendix E.) b. Development of PGPD protocols for addressing fishing activities (lawful or unlawful) that result in wildlife disturbance (i.e. interpretive enforcement protocols that lead to corrective actions to preclude future disturbance).
2. Walking
a. Support for outdoor docent programs such as Bay Net to educate shoreline users about observing wildlife non-intrusively. Signage at strategic overlook points addressing the same messages about responsible wildlife viewing.
PG CC 12/21/22
99 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 8
3. Tidepooling
a. Support for outdoor docent programs to educate shoreline users about observing non-intrusively within tidepool areas and about City and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) MPA regulations against take of tidepool organisms. Install signage at strategic overlook points addressing the same messages about tidepooling.
4. Photography/selfies
a. Collaboration with kayak and paddle craft vendors to promote responsible wildlife viewing techniques that discourage close approach to wildlife for selfies. b. Support for outdoor docent programs to educate shoreline users about nonintrusive wildlife observation and photography techniques. Install signage at strategic overlook points addressing the same messages about responsible wildlife viewing and photography techniques.
5. Kayaks, stand-up paddleboards, etc.
1. City ordinance requiring kayak and paddle craft vendors seeking a PG business license to place visible markings on rented craft that uniquely identify each craft so that any craft engaged in disturbing wildlife can be identified for follow-up.
6. Noise
1. Fireworks
a. For Feast of Lanterns and other firework events, consider using City permit or contracting authority to omit all “salute” rounds from future shows and restrict all shows to the usual and accustomed display site at Lovers Cove. Consider limiting the duration of shows and size of ordnance used in the shows. b. Gauge public support for alternative celebratory events that don’t include fireworks. If possible, celebrate in other ways.
2. Construction
a. City ordinance or permit condition limiting operation of construction activity near certain sensitive wildlife areas, with consideration of seasonal variations in wildlife use patterns.
3. Yard maintenance (chippers)
a. Control wood chipping operations near Hopkins harbor seal beach, with consideration of seasonal variations in wildlife use patterns.
PG CC 12/21/22
100 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 9
7. Poaching/unlawful resource extraction
1. Fishing in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs)
a. Training for police officers and public works staff regarding CDFW regulation of consumptive activities in the various MPAs along the Pacific Grove shoreline.
Development of standard protocols at PGPD to respond to illegal fishing within adjacent MPAs. (See California Code of Regulations, Title 14 and map of local MPAs in Appendix E.)
2. Collection and removal of biota
a. Enhanced enforcement of City ordinance and marine protected area (MPA) regulations against take of tidepool organisms through specific training for police officers and California State Parks rangers, and establishment of standard protocols for addressing observed illegal take. Continued support for signage program at strategic points addressing responsible tidepooling. (See Regulations Protecting Wildlife.)
b. Clarify differences between federal, state, and City regulations related to collecting biota. City ordinance (M.C. 14.04.030) limiting personal collection to “one handful” of dead animals or parts (i.e. shells, bones, etc.), detached plants and algae, pebbles, flotsam and jetsam needs to be changed to be in line with state MPA regulations.
Pollution
Byproducts of human activity cause many direct and indirect threats to wildlife. Pollution can be in the form of contaminated water, litter, microplastics, etc. Pollution can be both organic and inorganic in nature. Impacts can be acute or chronic.
1. Litter
1. Food waste
a. Install wildlife-proof trash receptacles throughout downtown Pacific Grove, along the coastal trail, near Lovers Point, and along Asilomar walking path.
Maintain sufficient staff to regularly empty receptacles before they reach capacity and overflow, with special attention to weekends and public holidays.
2. Cigarettes
a. Promote healthy, smoke-free beaches and the coastal recreation trail. b. Install devices for disposing of cigarette butts throughout downtown Pacific Grove, along the coastal trail, near Lovers Point, and along Asilomar walking path.
PG CC 12/21/22
101 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 10
3. Plastic pollution
a. Eliminate all single-use plastics in local businesses to become 100 percent free of plastic bags, plastic straws, plastic cutlery, plastic cups, styrofoam togo containers, etc. b. Ban the sale and release of any balloons.
c. If “bio-plastic” or compostable plastic alternatives are implemented in local businesses, the City must provide widespread collection of composting from both commercial and residential properties.
d. Install wildlife-proof recycling receptacles next to all trash cans throughout downtown Pacific Grove, along the coastal trail, near Lovers Point, and along Asilomar walking path.
e. Work with the California State Division of Boating and Waterways to install bins for collecting and recycling monofilament fishing line (PVC pipe receptacles) in popular shoreline fishing areas such as Otter Point.
4. Dog waste
a. Install additional dog-waste bag dispensers next to trash cans throughout downtown Pacific Grove, along the coastal trail, near Lovers Point, and next to entrances to Asilomar walking path and beach.
5. Water quality
1. Crespi Pond
a. Water quality is monitored quarterly through Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Citizen Watershed Monitoring Network, using baseline data collected in 2017.
b. The City dredges the pond when necessary (at writing, the last time this occurred was ~2015) to maintain the 70% open water to 30% vegetation cover recommended in a 2001 biological assessment and dunes habitat restoration plan. The 2020 Local Coastal Plan will allow dredging and suitable restoration to enhance natural habitats.
c. City should reach out to California State University Monterey Bay graduate level watershed classes to study the site for guidance and updates, and potential restoration options.
d. City should also consider reconstituting a Crespi Pond Advisory Committee as existed in the past.
2. Majella Creek
a. Begin water quality monitoring, either in conjunction with the National Marine Sanctuary Citizen Watershed Monitoring Network or following their protocols to generate baseline data. Partner with California State Parks to determine if they have historic data or would be willing to spearhead research.
PG CC 12/21/22
102 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 11
3. Storm drain runoff
a. Expand stormwater diversion program.
b. Continue drain and catchment basin cleaning during and after the first major rain.
c. Build green infrastructure to help filter and clean stormwater runoff before it enters creeks, rivers, and the ocean.
1. Utilize native plants in these affected areas to also create habitat for wildlife.
d. Reduce impervious surfaces throughout the City and coastal zone through the implementation of porous pavements and asphalts and the removal of unnecessary pavement.
4. Sewer collection system failures
a. Continue to improve sewer system
b. Manage a “planned retreat” and move sewer lines inland.
5. Future of sewer pipes along Sunset Drive & Ocean View Boulevard a. Redundant systems and improved wireless monitoring systems to alert system managers of failures in real time. Seek grant funds for equipment enhancements.
Coastal bluff erosion
Coastal bluffs comprise most terrestrial coastal wildlife habitat within Pacific Grove. Loss of this habitat would significantly threaten local wildlife populations. Multiple factors will continue to accelerate bluff erosion.
1. Sea-level rise (SLR)
a. Recommend managed retreat: Allow for the natural realignment of the shoreline due to SLR.
1. Begin long-term plan to move City infrastructure (i.e. purposeful, coordinated movement of buildings, sewage lines, roads, etc.) inland in preparation for rising sea levels. Be proactive, not reactive.
2. Investigate grant and funding options from state (e.g. Ocean Protection Council) to fund retreat operations.
b. Review all infrastructure improvements and building permit applications in the light of increasing sea levels and the effects on wildlife and coastal habitats. c. Remove the human-made debris and infrastructure before the underlying sediment is lost due to SLR. Do not leave infrastructure debris in what will need to transform into new healthy, functioning sandy or rocky beach habitat for coastal wildlife.
d. Actively restore or enhance the coastline to promote wildlife preservation as part of the retreat process.
PG CC 12/21/22
103 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 12
2. Sea wall maintenance/construction
a. Armoring to protect City infrastructure (sewer line, roads, etc.)
1. Preferred: Build no new sea walls and place no new riprap
2. Alternative one: For coastal development, use soft engineering alternatives (e.g. beach nourishment, dune restoration, etc.) described in the 2012 Evaluation of Erosion Mitigation Alternatives for Southern Monterey Bay instead of hard engineering approaches (e.g. seawalls and riprap).
3. Alternative two: For the few circumstances in which construction of a seawall is practicable and unavoidable, utilize the latest advances designed to enhance the development of intertidal organisms.
3. Unapproved trails
a. Unapproved trails descending steep coastal bluffs increase erosion in addition to disturbing wildlife. Prompt management is required. Fencing (split rail, cable fencing, or otherwise) blocking the path, signage, and re-planting of native plants in the unapproved trail is required.
b. A more managed and maintained trail system, similar to the trails installed at Asilomar State Beach, eliminates the incentive to create unapproved trails and allows for any native plant restoration to be more successful.
Problematic species
The composition of the Pacific Grove coastline plant community has been fundamentally altered over time. In large sections, non-native invasive plant species have replaced native species and provide little benefit to the local ecology. Certain populations of native wildlife have become unnaturally abundant because of human activities on the coastline. These species include American Crows, California ground squirrels, raccoons, and others. These species can have severe negative effects on the broader native wildlife community, resulting in a significant loss of local biodiversity.
1. Plants
a. Non-native plants, especially succulents such as iceplant (Carpobrotus edulis) and the red aloe (Aloe arborescens), contribute to erosion and are a “dead end” ecologically for most coastal wildlife. Removal of non-native plants and replacement with native plants would improve the habitat for the native wildlife.
1. Iceplant removal may be done mechanically or chemically, depending on the location, but should be done in a way that does not increase erosion and does not disturb archeological sites.
2. Removal of the red aloe should be done in a manner that doesn’t harm the coastal banana slug that seems to prefer to live in those plants.
PG CC 12/21/22
104 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 13 b. Any City coastal landscaping projects should be required to use native plants exclusively and the same is recommended for private homeowners. c. Existing patches of native plants and especially trees (Monterey Cypress, Monterey Pine, and Coast Live Oak) should be nurtured, not overly pruned, damaged, or removed except for hazardous trees.
2. Wildlife
a. See sections related to feeding wildlife and trash.
Species of Concern needing protection
There are several listed plant species that occur on or near the Pacific Grove coastline.
These include:
● Tidestrom’s Lupine Lupinus tidestromii
● Menzies’ Wallflower Erysimum menziesii
● Beach Layia Layia carnosa
● Sand (Monterey) Gillia Gilia tenuiflora ssp. arenaria ● Monterey Spineflower Chorizanthe pungens var. Pungens These plants are found in coastal dune and
coastal scrub plant communities and have all
been documented at Asilomar State Beach.
They likely occur in other areas around the
coast, both on City property and private
property. They are predominantly threatened by
development, trampling by foot traffic,
competition from non-native plants, and
herbivory. Clearly marked and well-maintained
trails along the coast would help these sensitive
plants. Re-introduction to areas where the
species have been extirpated should be
pursued.
PG CC 12/21/22
105 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 14 Two animal species sensitive to
disturbance and needing protection,
especially during breeding season,
are Black Oystercatchers and
Harbor Seals.
Black Oystercatchers are a
designated Federal and State
Species of Concern but there are no
specific regulations protecting them.
These vocal, charismatic shorebirds
are year-round residents on our
rocky shores. Pairs bond for life,
and each pair maintains a territory,
which male and female together defend vigorously, for foraging throughout the year and breeding primarily from May to August. If parents are driven away from the nest by any disturbance, such as a drone, the eggs or chicks are left vulnerable to gulls and other predators.
The young require 4-5 years to reach full maturity and begin nesting. The local population of some 15 pairs is not fledging young in sustainable numbers. They need awareness by people enjoying the shore. Ropes with signage placed around some highly trafficked nesting areas are meant to alert people.
Harbor Seals are protected by
Federal, State, and City
regulations (see Regulations
Protecting Wildlife). The seals
haul out on beaches or rocks
along local shores. Beaches at
Hopkins Marine Station (see
Areas of Special Interest) and at
5th Street have become important
sites of pupping, where females
give birth and nurse the pups for
about a month. Expectant and
mother seals are especially
sensitive to disturbance in late
stages of pregnancy and when
they have and nurse their pups, about February through June. People walking or in kayaks approaching the beaches invariably flush seals from the beach, causing the death of pups separated from their mothers. Hopkins Marine Station’s fence and the City’s seasonal woodlattice fencing along the Recreation Trail near 5th St. are protective. The wood-lattice fencing near 5th St. should remain up at least through June.
PG CC 12/21/22
106 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 15 Climate change
Climate change will have overwhelming permanent impacts on local wildlife populations, their habitats, and the City’s shoreline. Increasing temperatures and acidity in the ocean will affect wildlife and their food base. The City should do everything in its power to facilitate the adaptation of local wildlife to climate change while simultaneously working to reduce the human contribution to the climate crisis. Many actions that support our carbon reduction goals can in turn benefit wildlife.
Supporting native habitats and biodiversity will ensure our local wildlife populations are robust and can adapt to the upcoming changes. Thoughtful planning and development for the built areas of Pacific Grove, such as increased urban greenspaces, will simultaneously reduce emissions, sequester carbon, and benefit wildlife.
A multitude of documents have been developed specifically addressing the effects of climate change in California. See References and Resources.
1. Efforts towards Mitigation
1. Citywide effort to reduce carbon emissions
a. Assess public transportation for residents and visitors b. Promote monthly walk- and bike-to-work programs in local businesses and schools
c. Promote City as “walkable/bikeable”
1. Support Fort Ord Regional Trail And Greenway (FORTAG) project and Sustainable Pacific Grove
2. Citywide effort to increase local carbon sequestration a. Native tree and vegetation planting and maintenance on City property to help with wildlife habitat creation and carbon sequestration. b. Annual program to encourage local property owners to plant native trees and vegetation on their property.
2. Efforts towards Adaptation
1. State of California Sea-level Rise Guidance
a. This updated document, the “State of California Sea-Level Rise Guidance” (Guidance), provides a bold, science-based methodology for state and local governments to analyze and assess the risks associated with sea-level rise, and to incorporate sea-level rise into their planning, permitting, and investment decisions. This Guidance provides: 1. A PG CC 12/21/22
107 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 16 synthesis of the best available science on sea-level rise projections and rates for California; 2. A step-by-step approach for state agencies and local governments to evaluate those projections and related hazard information in decision making; and 3. Preferred coastal adaptation approaches.
https://www.opc.ca.gov/webmaster/ftp/pdf/agenda_items/20180314/Item3 _Exhibit-A_OPC_SLR_Guidance-rd3.pdf
2. California Coastal Commission Sea-Level Rise Adopted Policy Guidance a. “The original Sea-Level Rise Policy Guidance document was unanimously adopted for use by the Coastal Commission on Wednesday, August 12, 2015. It provides an overview of the best available science on sea-level rise for California and recommended methodology for addressing sea-level rise in Coastal Commission planning and regulatory actions. It is intended to serve as a multi-purpose resource for a variety of audiences and includes a high level of detail on many subjects. Since the document is not specific to a particular geographic location or development intensity, readers should view the content as a menu of options to use only if relevant, rather than a checklist of required actions.
On Wednesday, November 7, 2018, the Coastal Commission
unanimously adopted a Science Update to the Sea-Level Rise Policy Guidance. The science-focused changes reflect recent scientific studies and statewide guidance that update our understanding of best available science on sea-level rise projections relevant to California. Other sections of the Guidance remain unchanged.”
https://www.coastal.ca.gov/climate/slrguidance.html
b. Recommendation: The City of Pacific Grove should consider this a valuable resource.
3. Ocean & Climate Platform: Sea’ties initiative
a. “The goal of the Sea’ties initiative is to facilitate the development of public policies and the implementation of adaptation solutions for coastal cities threatened by rising sea levels. Developed by the Ocean & Climate Platform, the initiative is aimed at elected representatives, administrators and stakeholders involved in this transition as a forum for sharing experiences of sustainable solutions. Sea’ties is an international initiative to mobilize cities which feature a diversity of climatic, geographic, social, economic and political contexts. Many solutions have already been implemented across the world and can be inspirational for other regions.
By making connections between concrete experiences and characterizing PG CC 12/21/22
108 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 17 them through illuminating scientific works, we can promote the most suitable practices and support the choices of political decision makers and regional administrators.”
https://ocean-climate.org/en/home-2/?lang=en
b. The State of California is a member as is the City of Santa Cruz.
Recommendation: The City of Pacific Grove should join; members gain access to resources for adapting to sea-level rise.
PG CC 12/21/22
109 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 18 Areas of Special Interest
Six Areas of Special Interest were identified by combining research from local organizations monitoring coastal wildlife. Locations along the coast in which wildlife species are observed or especially high species diversity has been recorded were manually outlined on a map using the program ArcGIS 10.7.1 (ESRI. Redlands, CA) to better understand how these areas related spatially. The Areas of Special Interest coalesced organically since the spaces used by coastal wildlife frequently are similar for many of the species. The identified Areas of Special Interest include (from north to south):
Hopkins Marine Station
Lover’s Point
Point Pinos
The Great Tidepool
Asilomar North
Asilomar South
Maps that depict the features of each Area of Special Interest are included below, along with summaries of main problems threatening these locations. Protection and mitigation of threats at these specific locations may help multiple coastal wildlife species, although the entirety of the coastline is important habitat for these species. Protection of the entire Pacific Grove coastline is ideal.
The maps include the high-tide line at both 0-foot SLR and 5-foot SLR. 0-foot SLR is the current average high tide line. 5-foot SLR is where the average high tide will be located with an additional 5-foot increase in SLR. These data are from NOAA: https://coast.noaa.gov/slrdata/ PG CC 12/21/22
110 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 19 PG CC 12/21/22
111 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 20 Hopkins Marine Station Area
Description (from Pacific Grove Shoreline Management Plan) Hopkins Marine Station—the oldest marine laboratory on the west coast and a venerable local institution—sits on Point Cabrillo and occupies most of the shoreline frontage along this segment. (Whereas most of Pacific Grove’s shoreline is owned by the City, most of this segment is owned by Stanford University.) The facility is fenced to prevent public access to its beaches and other surrounding ecological habitat, which are home to two sensitive animal species: black oystercatchers and harbor seals. This section of the shoreline is surrounded by the Lovers Point-Julia Platt State Marine Reserve.
Important Features
● Marine mammal and bird hotspot area
● Biodiverse intertidal area
● Long-term scientific monitoring and research sites
● Three Harbor Seal haul-out areas
● Three Harbor Seal pupping areas
● Coastal armoring
Threats
1. Invasive plant species: extensive iceplant cover
o Recommend coastal bluff restoration – remove iceplant as feasible taking into account the archeological sensitivity of the site, and in consultation with Stanford’s archeologist.
2. Trespassers at seal rookeries
3. Loud, unusual noises, including aircraft
4. Kayakers and paddle boarders approaching wildlife too closely and/or landing on beaches and rocks, flushing out birds and harbor seals
5. Drones
6. Sea-level rise. Amount and quality of new habitat exposed after coastal shift unknown.
PG CC 12/21/22
112 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 21 PG CC 12/21/22
113 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 22 Lovers Point Area
Description (from Pacific Grove Shoreline Management Plan) Lovers Point Park and Beach, are perhaps the most popular spots along Pacific Grove’s shoreline. The park and beaches are ringed by old yet stable stone walls, and there is riprap to protect a section of wall in the beach cove. Seawalls continue beyond Lovers Point Park to between Clyte and Moss Streets. Just east of Naiad Street, a 30-foot-long, 5-foot-tall section of wall that failed in January 2017 has been repaired. Past the seawalls to Sea Palm Avenue, the shoreline is marked by soil slumping, shallow landslides and channel erosion. This section of the shoreline is surrounded by the Lovers Point-Julia Platt State Marine Reserve and the Pacific Grove Marine Gardens State Marine Conservation Area.
Important Features
● Biodiverse intertidal area
● Two Harbor Seal haul-out areas
● Coastal armoring
Threats
1. Kayaks/paddle boards
2. High incidence of ground squirrels due to human food sources
3. Drones
4. High volume of foot traffic
5. High quantity of urban stormwater run-off
6. Substantial pre-existing armament
7. Sea-level rise. Amount and quality of new habitat exposed after coastal shift unknown.
PG CC 12/21/22
114 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 23 PG CC 12/21/22
115 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 24 Point Pinos Area
Description
This area of coastline extends roughly from Asilomar Ave and John Denver Rock West and then South up to (but not including) the Great Tidepool. The Great Tidepool has its own Area of Interest. The rocky intertidal area that fronts the site is extensive, extending several hundred feet from sandy dune areas to the ocean edge of the rocky shelf. There is a network of unimproved trails with some segments encroaching into sensitive dune habitat. This area also includes Crespi Pond, which is a unique wetland area on the Pacific Grove coastline. This section of the shoreline is surrounded by the Pacific Grove Marine Gardens State Marine Conservation Area and Asilomar State Marine Reserve.
Important Features
● Marine mammal and bird hotspot area
● Critical migratory seabird roosting habitat
● Biodiverse intertidal area
● Long-term scientific monitoring site
● Crespi Pond (important bird habitat)
● Coastal armoring
Threats
1. Trampling (threat severity unknown)
2. Harassment disturbance of roosting species by rock climbers
3. Collecting/removal of biota
4. High incidence of ground squirrels due to human food sources
5. Degradation of water quality and habitat at Crespi Pond. In particular removal of native wetland grasses and habitats and replacement with biologically homogenous golf course grasses has reduced volume and diversity of bird species.
6. Drones
7. Sea-level rise. Amount and quality of new habitat exposed after coastal shift unknown.
PG CC 12/21/22
116 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 25 PG CC 12/21/22
117 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 26 Great Tidepool Area
Description
This Area of Interest includes the small cove south of Point Pinos, the Great Tidepool, and south to Lighthouse Ave. It includes multiple rocky headlands with complex intertidal habitat.
Parking lot area is heavily armored. This section of the shoreline is surrounded by the Asilomar State Marine Reserve.
Important Features
● Multiple small rocky headlands
● Great Tidepool (located in southern ⅓ of the hotspot) site of Ed Ricketts’ research and collecting, of cultural/historical significance
● Critical migratory seabird roosting habitat
● Biodiverse intertidal area
● Historical intertidal monitoring site
● Coastal armoring
Threats
1. Collecting/removal of biota (threat severity unknown)
2. Flushing, disturbance by beachgoers and tidepoolers
3. Illegal shore fishing
4. Drones
5. Sea-level rise. Amount and quality of new habitat exposed after coastal shift unknown.
PG CC 12/21/22
118 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 27 PG CC 12/21/22
119 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 28 Asilomar North
Description
The Asilomar North section includes a large rocky headland where many birds like to roost in the winter and Black Oystercatchers nest in the summer. Fresh-water seeps and outflow from the City streets adds some unique plant species to this section of coastline. The area extends roughly from the Arena Ave cove south to Pico Ave. This section of the shoreline is surrounded by the Asilomar State Marine Reserve.
Important Features
● Marine mammal and seabird hotspot area
● Nudibranch hotspot
● Long-term scientific monitoring site (nudibranchs)
● Freshwater outflow supporting native plants
Threats
1. Trampling (threat severity unknown)
2. Harassment/disturbance by pedestrians and off-leash dogs
3. Drones
○ No official rule/code for No Drones at the park, but rangers do enforce a No Drones policy. Signage and information on the park website and trails is needed.
4. Future of recreation trail
○ State Parks is working on moving eroding section of coast trail farther inland (between trailheads 18 and 19), going around the pump station and into the parking area.
○ Northern section of trail between trailheads 19 and 20 is already rerouted farther inland (satellite imagery does not show this work, which was completed winter 2019).
5. Future of pump station
○ Cliff around pump station rapidly eroding, future high tides will certainly threaten roadway as well.
6. Sea-level rise. Bluffs rapidly eroding.
PG CC 12/21/22
120 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 29 PG CC 12/21/22
121 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 30 Asilomar South
Description
The Asilomar South section includes multiple rocky headlands where many birds like to roost in the winter and harbor seals and sea otters haul out at low tides. Fresh-water seeps and outflow from the City streets adds some unique plant species to this section of coastline. The area extends roughly from Pico Ave to the main large Asilomar sandy beach. Area includes Majella Creek and willow patch. Many shorebird and seabird species forage on the shoreline and rocks plus many unique species use Majella Creek and willow patch. Long sandy beach is very popular, but confusion persists regarding rules at State Parks versus Pebble Beach areas.
Important Features
● Two Harbor Seal haul-out areas
● Marine mammal and seabird hotspot area
● Long-term scientific monitoring site (UCSC’s MARINe and LiMPETS) ● Invertebrates, fishes, algae and sea grasses
Threats
1. Trampling (threat severity unknown)
2. Pollution especially into freshwater seeps (knowledge gap)
3. Collecting/removal of biota
4. Future of recreation trail
○ State Parks moved threatened section of coast trail farther inland (between trailheads 10 and 11) but missed opportunity to re-direct people away from this important rocky outcropping by not continuing a section of fence line.
5. Drones
○ No official rule/code for No Drones at the park, but rangers do enforce a No Drones policy. Signage and information on the park website and trails is needed.
6. Sea-level rise
○ Parking along Sunset Ave near the main sandy beach is rapidly eroding.
Discussions between City staff and state parks need to be initiated.
7. Pedestrians, including off-leash dogs, in rocks off trail ○ Sensitive pinnipeds and shorebirds rest in these rocks, frequent disturbance ○ Seasonal closure of the identified seabird and pinniped rocks would be extremely beneficial to wildlife
PG CC 12/21/22
122 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 31 Regulations Protecting Wildlife
California Code of Regulations, Title 14
14 CCR §251.1. Harassment of Animals.
Except as otherwise authorized in these regulations or in the Fish and Game Code, no person shall harass, herd or drive any game or nongame bird or mammal or furbearing mammal. For the purposes of this section, harass is defined as an intentional act which disrupts an animal's normal behavior patterns, including, but not limited to, breeding, feeding, or sheltering. This section does not apply to a landowner or tenant who drives or herds birds or mammals for the purpose of preventing damage to private or public property, including aquaculture and agriculture crops.
14 CCR § 632 Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), Marine Managed Areas (MMAs), and Special Closures.
(a) General Rules and Regulations:
The areas specified in this section have been declared by the commission to be marine protected areas, marine managed areas, or special closures. Public use of marine protected areas, marine managed areas, or special closures shall be compatible with the primary purposes of such areas. MPAs, MMAs, and special closures are subject to the following general rules and regulations in addition to existing Fish and Game Code statutes and regulations of the commission, except as otherwise provided for in subsection 632(b), areas and special regulations for use. Nothing in this section expressly or implicitly precludes, restricts or requires modification of current or future uses of the waters identified as marine protected areas, special closures, or the lands or waters adjacent to these designated areas by the Department of Defense, its allies or agents.
(1) Protection of Resources in MPAs and MMAs, as defined in Public Resources Code Section 36710:
(A) State Marine Reserves: In a state marine reserve, it is unlawful to injure, damage, take, or possess any living, geological, or cultural marine resource, except under a scientific collecting permit issued by the department pursuant to Section 650 or specific authorization from the commission for research, restoration, or monitoring purposes. (C) State Marine Conservation Areas: In a state marine conservation area, it is unlawful to injure, damage, take, or possess any living, geological, or cultural marine resource for commercial or recreational purposes, or a combination of commercial and recreational purposes except as specified in subsection 632(b), areas and special regulations for use. The department may issue scientific collecting permits pursuant to Section 650. The commission may authorize PG CC 12/21/22
123 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 32 research, education, and recreational activities, and certain commercial and recreational harvest of marine resources, provided that these uses do not compromise protection of the species of interest, natural community, habitat, or geological features.
Pacific Grove Municipal Code
10.10.010 Prohibited – Where – Exceptions.
(a) It is unlawful for any person to feed or offer food to any animal, or to scatter food, seed or other forms of matter attractive to animals on any public way, street, park or public property, or within 100 feet of any body of water or coastline, in the city, or on any property in such city of which such person is not lawfully possessed.
14.04.020 Unlawful acts.
Anyone taking specimens of marine plant life, or who willfully disturbs, injures or destroys marine animal habitats or who removes sand, gravel, or rocks therefrom shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and may be prosecuted pursuant to Chapter 1.16 PGMC. [Ord. 13-018 § 3, 2013; Ord. 08-006 § 47, 2008; Ord. 1004 N.S. § 1, 1978; Ord. 210 N.S. § 5-401(2), 1952].
14.04.080 Unlawful acts during the Harbor Seal Pupping Season Anyone who interferes with activities taken in accord with this Chapter to protect harbor seals during the pupping season, or to encourage seals to move off the beach, including but not limited to trespassing, protective fencing, removing signage, or other acts that may be detrimental to the seals and their pups shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and may be prosecuted pursuant to Chapter 1.16 PGMC.
14.08.010 Unlawful acts within limits of park, golf course or beach. (f) To throw, deposit, place or leave in or upon any place within said parks or upon said beaches or golf course any waste papers, cans, bottles, trash, refuse or rubbish of any kind, except in a receptacle provided for such purpose by the city;
Monterey County
Chapter 8.42 - WILDLIFE PROTECTION
8.42.010 - Harbor seal molestation.
It is unlawful to harass, worry, bother, pester, interfere with, molest, harry, frighten, or tease harbor seals or shoot, throw, or otherwise project an object at harbor seals, or enter designated restricted areas set up to protect harbor seals.
PG CC 12/21/22
124 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 33 (Ord. 3629, 1992)
8.42.012 - Feeding of wildlife prohibited.
i. No person shall feed or in any manner intentionally provide food as sustenance or to encourage domesticity in a non-domesticated animal with the exception of a bird feeder in the yard. A person may feed or provide food to wildlife under the following circumstances:
ii. When the wildlife is maintained, treated or fed pursuant to a valid certificate or permit issued by the State of California or an agency of the U.S. Government; iii. When the wildlife is maintained, treated or fed between the time Animal Control or Humane Society is notified and the time the wildlife is picked up by such agency. (Ord. 3629, 1992)
8.42.014 - Wildlife protection.
iv. No person shall take or harass any wildlife or enter an entrance designated as a restricted area set up to protect wildlife.
PG CC 12/21/22
125 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 34 Appendix A. Feeding wildlife
Dangers of feeding wildlife
Feeding wildlife, either directly or indirectly, is a harmful practice that subsidizes and supports certain urban-adaptive species (urban adapters) in our community, while excluding and harming other more specialized species (urban avoiders). The complexity lies in the fact that while feeding gulls or squirrels at the shoreline doesn’t immediately harm nesting birds or intertidal invertebrates, the increased population and heightened presence of species benefiting from human food ultimately causes harm in the long-term to the specialist species through ecosystem level interactions. For example, feeding American Crows may ultimately harm nesting Black Oystercatchers, since the crow population increases locally and they are in turn potential predators on oystercatcher eggs and chicks.
Table 1. Examples of avian urban adapters and avoiders. Urban adapters are usually more opportunistic and omnivorous, while urban avoiders are usually specialists, species that eat specific food items or have strict nesting requirements that are not readily available in urban areas.
Avian urban adapters Avian urban avoiders
American Crow Black Oystercatcher
Western Gull Western Snowy Plover
Brewer’s Blackbird Varied Thrush
House Sparrow Red Crossbill
European Starling Oak Titmouse
Eurasian Collared-Dove California Thrasher
This issue overlaps with the general misapprehension the general public feels about larger urban-adaptive mammal species, such as raccoons and opossums, thriving within the City.
Once again, the additional food resources available to urban adapters in the City allow their populations to increase above numbers seen in more natural areas. More food resources allow for smaller territories and a higher density of individual animals. People are sometimes afraid of these mid-sized urban mammals and express concern when these animals begin living under a shed or interacting with their pets. These are legitimate concerns, since some human-wildlife interactions can become dangerous for all creatures involved.
PG CC 12/21/22
126 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 35 Mitigation options
Some ways to reduce the harm to native, specialist species within the City is to ensure that food waste is inaccessible to the urban adapters. The trash cans along the coast trail and at restaurants on the coast should be wildlife resistant, such as those seen at most national and state parks (Figure 1). These large, metal trash and recycling receptacles may be more expensive, but they will help reduce the consumption of human food by urban wildlife and reduce the amount of trash and plastic entering the ocean. A program in which local organizations could “adopt” a trash can would be a positive action. A local non-profit or family could purchase the trash receptacle and decorate it, similar to the artwork on the utility boxes along streets in Monterey and Santa Cruz. Educational signage describing the natural history of the coastal wildlife these trash cans are protecting could be displayed.
Public outreach explaining the negative
consequences of leaving dog or cat food outside
would also be beneficial. Members of the public
frequently complain about raccoons in their
backyard, while simultaneously leaving food out
for their cat on the patio. The presence of
raccoons is directly connected to the cat food.
The raccoons will not loiter in the backyard if
there is nothing to attract them. Educated
residents could ideally make the connection and
act appropriately. Also, more information about
the negative impact to wildlife from improperly
sealed trash containers at private homes would
be beneficial.
Rules are already in place to attempt and reduce
the feeding of wildlife. City ordinance 10.10.010
prohibits the feeding of wildlife and needs stricter
enforcement, especially along the coastline. A specific allocation of funds for addressing wildlife related issues, including the reduction of feeding wildlife along the coastal trail, is critical. Foot or bicycle patrols by local police officials between Berwick Park and Perkins Park along the coastal recreation trail during high visitation times (Memorial Day to Labor Day weekends and other holidays) may help decrease the incidence of wildlife being fed and reduce the number of bites sustained by people from the local squirrels. Doctors on Duty on Lighthouse Ave in Monterey receives many cases of squirrel bites from Lovers Point during the tourist season.
California ground squirrels (Otospermophilus beecheyi) are well adapted to the coastal recreation trail in Pacific Grove. People directly feeding the squirrels is likely the greatest contributor to their high density at Point Pinos and Lovers Point compared to other spots along the coast. Another food source for them is the leaf and fruit of the non-native iceplant (Carpobrotus edulis) which blankets the coastline along the recreation trail. This succulent is Figure 1. BearSaver BE Series 140 Gal. Animal
Resistant Double Waste Receptacle from
globalindustrial.com
PG CC 12/21/22
127 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 36 essentially an ecological dead-end for most local wildlife, providing no structure to nest in or food to consume. In addition, the riprap that has been installed in areas of erosion provides safe burrows for the ground squirrels. Removal of the ice plant and replanting with plant species native to coastal dunes and bluffs would likely reduce the population of ground squirrels.
Removal of the riprap may also help reduce their numbers.
Figure 2. Person feeding California ground squirrel at
Lover’s Point.
PG CC 12/21/22
128 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 37 Appendix B. Recommended protocols for Black Oystercatcher protection
City of Pacific Grove
Black Oystercatcher Protection Protocol
Purpose
The purpose of this protocol is to help protect the Black Oystercatcher, a bird of conservation concern and a year-around resident along the coastline of the City of Pacific Grove (hereafter referred to as the “City”), and to provide an orderly approach to the annual installation and removal of physical protective measures intended to help with the conservation of the species.
This is a protocol developed by the City and the California Central Coast Black Oystercatcher Project (CCCBOP). Note that the Coastal Act explicitly grants protection of fragile natural resources priority over public access (see Appendix A). Any conflicts between protection and access are to be resolved “in a manner which on balance is the most protective of significant coastal resources”. Appendix B offers background information on the Black Oystercatcher monitoring project and Appendix C on the Black Oystercatcher.
Black Oystercatcher Protection Protocol
Protection Approach
The City, along with the CCCBOP, in collaboration with the Monterey Peninsula Audubon Society, will use an approach that allows for the implementation of proven protective measures for the best short-term outcome while learning what works and what does not work, to determine the best practices for the long term.
In the short-term, the City will focus on the proven physical protective measures using current City resources (e.g., temporary fencing materials) and personnel with assistance from the CCCBOP (e.g., laminated signs) and Monterey Peninsula Audubon Society (e.g., limited funding for emergency purchase of addition fencing material). This will be supplemented by outreach and public education efforts (e.g., on-site docents and citizen science volunteers) coordinated by the CCCBOP in conjunction with Monterey Peninsula Audubon Society, Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History, California Coastal National Monument, and the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary.
PG CC 12/21/22
129 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 38 Physical Protective measures
The physical protective measures to be considered are temporary and range from signage to protective fencing:
Signs. Signage provides important information about what is being protected and why it is being protected. Of a variety of signage options, only a few types of signs are in current use:
- Laminated Signs. The primary option will be laminated signs: “Help Save Our Coastal Birds”. The wording on these signs has been approved by the local staff of the California Coastal Commission. These signs are what we now use on City property along the coastline.
These signs can be posted on existing fences, attached to A-frames or temporary poles or stakes, and affixed to ropes or lattice fencing as needed. - Aluminum Enamel Signs. The City has worked with the Bureau of Land Management’s California Coastal National Monument (CCNM) on placing “Respect Wildlife” aluminum enamel signs at Point Pinos. The CCNM developed and had the signs made, but in order to maintain a consistent look, the City provided and placed the base for each sign (wooden 4” x 4” base with a wooden 45° angle platform to which the sign is attached) for each sign. - Other Signs. In addition to the previously mentioned signage, other appropriate signs may be developed and approved.
Traffic A-Frames. Traffic A-frames, used throughout the City for a variety of purposes, offer a quick option where other measures may not be feasible. They can be put up rapidly and easily and a paper or laminated sign can be attached to them. As needed, caution tape can be strung between them until a more appropriate protective measure can be put in place.
Ropes. Ropes, especially twisted manila or sisal natural fiber ropes, provide a flexible option where other protective measures may not be feasible. Laminated signs can be attached to ropes, and ropes can be easily installed and taken down. They can be tied or attached to rocks or even strung at ground level so that they are visible only when someone is in the immediate area.
Rods & Cable. Metal rods with eyelets and cable, as used along City coastal trails, provide a more effective, aesthetic protective measure than traffic A-frames or ropes. With rods & cable, fewer signs may be needed.
Plastic Mesh Safety Fencing. Plastic mesh safety fencing can be used where human safety as well as protection for nesting birds or roving chicks may be needed. This material is less aesthetic than other fencing, but it is a flexible method that can be quickly rolled out. It conveys temporary safety concerns and makes it clear that one is not to cross over or around it without potentially dangerous or injurious consequences.
PG CC 12/21/22
130 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 39 Wooden Snow Fencing. Like plastic mesh safety fencing, wooden snow or drift fencing can be rolled out and taken up quickly. It is much more aesthetic and much less visually obtrusive than temporary plastic fencing.
Lattice Fencing. If installed appropriately, lattice fencing is attractive, and sturdier than most of the previously mentioned measures. When needed, it can be used to cover gaps in the City’s permanent rail fencing and/or attached to existing fencing in order to limit people from going through or over the permanent fencing.
Other Protective measures. Consideration will also be given to other physical protective measures not listed here but that may be identified in the future and could be effectively applied in appropriate situations. This could include anything from the installation of wildlife trail cameras to interpretive panels to additional rail fencing.
Protection Procedures
Representatives for Involved Parties. The following persons will serve as the formal contacts representing the parties involved in the Black Oystercatcher protection protocol:
City of Pacific Grove –
Environmental Programs Manager (hereafter referred to as the “City representative”):
Current staff
Black Oystercatcher Monitoring Project –
Local Project Coordinator (hereafter referred to as the “Project representative”):
Rick Hanks 831-588-3150 [email protected]
Monterey Audubon Society –
President:
Blake Matheson [email protected]
Changes in Representatives. Any party may change the individual and/or position of its representative by providing written notification of such change to the other parties.
Designation of Alternate Representative. When it is known that either representative will not be available during a critical time or for a needed meeting, the respective representative will appoint an alternate to serve for a designated time period. As soon as practical, the respective representative will inform his counterpart, via email and phone, of the name and duration for which the alternate will be serving in that capacity.
PG CC 12/21/22
131 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 40 Representatives’ Roles & Responsibilities.
City of Pacific Grove Contact Representative:
- Serves as the City’s representative when dealing with protecting Black Oystercatchers along the City’s coastline.
- Communicates and coordinates the needed Black Oystercatcher protective measures with the City’s Public Works Department and Police Department, as well as with the City’s Planning Commission, the Beautification and Natural Resources Commission, and other City entities as appropriate.
- Communicates and coordinates with the Project representative on all issues concerning the needs and implementation of Black Oystercatcher protective measures along the City’s coastline, including if, where, and when protective measures are needed.
- Develops, in collaboration with the Project representative, an annual pre-season plan for implementing needed Black Oystercatcher protective measures. - Keeps the City Manager, and the Mayor and City Council as appropriate, informed regarding the implementation of the protective measures and other issues related to the program.
- Communicates and coordinates, as appropriate, with the local staff of the California Coastal Commission.
- Responds in an appropriate timeframe to actions needed to protect Black Oystercatchers.
Black Oystercatcher Monitoring Project Representative:
- Serves as the Black Oystercatcher Monitoring Project’s representative for dealing with the protection of Black Oystercatchers along the City’s coastline. - Communicates and coordinates, as appropriate, with Monterey Peninsula Audubon, Audubon California, California Coastal National Monument, Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History, and other entities involved in the protection, monitoring, and/or outreach related to Black Oystercatchers along the City’s coastline.
PG CC 12/21/22
132 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 41 - Communicates and coordinates with the City representative on all issues concerning the needs and implementation of Black Oystercatcher protective measures along the City’s coastline, including if, where, and when protective measures are needed.
- Collaborates with the City representative on the development of an annual preseason plan for implementing needed Black Oystercatcher protective measures. - Keeps the citizen-science monitors of the local Black Oystercatcher monitoring project informed regarding the City’s actions to implement the protection of Black Oystercatchers along the City’s coastline.
- Monitors the Black Oystercatcher nesting activities along the City’s coastline, identifies where protective measures are needed, and brings those needs and the recommended actions to address them to the attention of the City representative. - Responds in an appropriate timeframe to City requests related to actions needed to protect Black Oystercatchers.
- Assigns a Black Oystercatcher monitor, when appropriate, to be present to help ensure that when a specific protective measure is being installed or removed, it does not have a negative impact on Black Oystercatchers.
General Procedure. The following general procedure will be followed, unless the two parties agree that an exception should be made:
Pre-Breeding Season
1. Before April 1, the City representative and the Project representative will meet to discuss what, when, and where protective measures may be anticipated for the upcoming Black Oystercatcher breeding season along the City’s coastline.
2. The City representative and the Project representative will determine what protective measures (e.g., annual signing and lattice fencing) are needed to be put in place at specific known nesting sites prior to nesting and what precautionary measures are needed to ensure that the nesting pairs are not impacted by the installation of the specific protective measures.
PG CC 12/21/22
133 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 42
3. Once the City representative and the Project representative agree on what protective measures will be implemented, and no later than April 15, they will briefly outline and sign-off on an annual pre-season plan (This can be accomplished via email).
4. All reasonable steps, including having a Black Oystercatcher monitor, when appropriate, on-site, will be taken to assure that the installation and removal of agreed upon pre-breeding season measures do not impact the Black Oystercatchers.
5. In the event that the City representative and the Project representative cannot reach an agreement as to the appropriate protective measures to be taken, the two representatives will meet with the City Manager and Monterey Audubon Society President, or designee, for possible resolution.
Breeding Season
1. After April 15, if it is determined by the Project representative that a specific Black Oystercatcher nesting area, or a roosting or foraging area for chicks, is in need of protection, he will contact the City representative to discuss:
a. The need and urgency of the situation,
b. What protective measures should be taken, and
c. How soon protective measures are needed.
2. If the City representative and the Project Coordinator agree on what specific protective measures should be implemented for a specific site, they will briefly outline and sign-off on the agreed upon implementation (This can be accomplished via email).
3. In the event that the City representative and the Project Coordinator cannot reach an agreement as to the appropriate protective measures to be taken, the two representatives will meet as soon as possible with the City Manager and Monterey Audubon Society President, or designee, for possible resolution.
4. If a specific location is no longer in need of protective measures (e.g., nest failure or no indication of re-nesting is observed), the Project representative will inform the City representative and the protective measures for that specific location can be removed.
PG CC 12/21/22
134 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 43 End of Breeding Season
1. In September, the Project representative will inform the City representative when the breeding season has ended and all remaining protective measures can be removed.
2. After the Project representative has informed the City representative that the breeding season has ended, the two representatives will meet in order to debrief on what protective measures worked and which ones either did not work or could be improved upon, as well as identifying other protective actions, physical or administrative, needed to enhance the program. Information from these meetings will be used for improving and developing future measures.
APPENDIX 1
Coastal Act Provisions for Protecting Significant Coastal Resources The following Coastal Act section is used by Coastal Commission Staff to support a finding to protect natural resources instead of public access that could trample them:
COASTAL ACT SECTION 30007.5
The Legislature further finds and recognizes that conflicts may occur between one or more policies of the division.
The Legislature therefore declares that in carrying out the provisions of this division such conflicts be resolved in a manner which on balance is the most protective of significant coastal resources.
Also, the Coastal Act provides:
Section 30214(a) of the Coastal Act states, in part:
(a) The public access policies of this article shall be implemented in a manner that takes into account the need to regulate the time, place, and manner of public access depending on the facts and circumstances in each case including, but not limited to, the following:
(1) Topographic and geologic site characteristics.
(2) The capacity of the site to sustain use and at what level of intensity. (3) The appropriateness of limiting public access to the right to pass and repass depending on such factors as the fragility of the natural resources in the area and the proximity of the access area to adjacent residential uses.
PG CC 12/21/22
135 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 44 APPENDIX 2
California Central Coast Black Oystercatcher Project
Project Partners. The California Central Coast Black Oystercatcher Project (CCCBOP) is part of a California coast-wide, multi-year effort coordinated by Audubon California in conjunction with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), US Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) California Coastal National Monument (CCNM), California State Parks (Mendocino Coast, Monterey, and Morro Coast Districts), and five Audubon chapters (Mendocino Coast, Madrone, Marin, Monterey Peninsula, and Morro Bay).
The CCCBOP is conducted as a citizen science effort overseen by Audubon California and coordinated by the CCNM in partnership with the Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History (a CCNM Collaborative Partner) and California State Parks (a CCNM Core-Managing Partner).
Additional collaborators include Point Lobos Docents, the Monterey Peninsula Audubon Society, and the Bay Net Volunteer Naturalist Program of the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (a CCNM Collaborative Partner).
The CCCBOP includes Pacific Grove, covering the area from the south side of Point Lobos State Natural Reserve on the southern coast of the Monterey Bay region to the north side of Pescadero State Beach on the northern coast of the Monterey Bay region.
Project Goals. The statewide California Black Oystercatcher Project is a large-scale, standardized, citizen-science based effort directed toward the following goals:
1. Gather demographic data on this little studied top predator of the California intertidal ecosystem, necessary to establish a solid demographic number from which to measure population stability or decline;
2. Monitor reproductive success for at least five to ten years in order to obtain a sample robust enough to document any trends in reproductive success of this species of conservation concern. Compare these data with data on other rocky intertidal marine species within the same areas in order to assess the long-term health of the rocky ecosystems affected by such factors as sea-level rise, ocean acidification, climate change, and rapidly expanding human populations.
3. Assess continued management and outreach actions that directly protect and improve nesting sites and habitat;
4. Determine what causes loss of eggs and chicks in some areas and high success rates in other areas;
PG CC 12/21/22
136 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 45
5. Develop partnerships to share key information among agencies and scientists seeking to address questions about climate change impacts to coastal assemblages; and
6. Identify conservation activities that can be implemented to reduce disturbance to breeding birds, including both physical measures and outreach efforts, and assist with preservation of the species.
APPENDIX 3
Black Oystercatcher: Importance & Life-History Parameters Importance & Listing. The Black Oystercatcher Haematopus bachmani is a keystone species along the North Pacific shoreline and is considered a particularly sensitive indicator of the overall health of the rocky intertidal community. This marine shorebird, with its unique appearance, distinctive calls, visibility as an obligate inhabitant of the rocky intertidal zone, and year-round residency in Pacific Grove, is a rich contributor to the City’s world-renowned coastal resource values that are key to the City’s quality of life and robust tourism economy.
The Black Oystercatcher was identified as a USFWS focal species for priority conservation action because multiple factors make it vulnerable to decline: small global population size, low reproductive success, and complete dependence on rocky intertidal shorelines that are impacted by human use and rising sea levels.
In addition, the Black Oystercatcher is listed as a “species of high concern” within the United States, Canadian, Alaskan, and Northern and Southern Pacific shorebird conservation plans. The USFWS has also listed it as a “Bird of Conservation Concern.” The 1988 amendment to the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act mandates the USFWS to “identify species, subspecies, and populations of all migratory nongame birds that, without additional conservation actions, are likely to become candidates for listing under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.” Range & Population Size. The California coast is a critical part of the Black Oystercatcher range, which extends from the Aleutian Islands to Baja California. The total population is estimated to be about 12,000, while the population along the 1100-mile California coast is estimated to be about 4,000 (inventory in 2011).
Pre-Breeding Activities. Pre-breeding season activities begin as early as February when copulation attempts may begin. During March and April, pairs can be observed doing rock tossing and nest scraping around their known nesting sites and in other locations within their respective territories.
PG CC 12/21/22
137 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 46 Breeding Season. Black Oystercatcher breeding season is from April through September. For the California Central Coast, egg laying usually begins in late April and runs through late June.
Nests & Eggs. Black Oystercatchers nest above the high tide line on offshore rocks, rocky shores, and sand/gravel beaches. The typical nest is a bed of rock flakes, pebbles, and shell fragments, pulled into a low bowl. Black Oystercatchers lay 1 to 3 eggs, but usually raise 1 to 2 chicks to fledging (i.e., having the ability to fly). Incubation ranges from 26 to 32 days and is shared by both the male and female.
Chicks. Chicks are able to walk almost immediately after hatching. Hatchling chicks will be brooded nearly continuously for the first couple of days and intermittently for the following week. When not brooded, chicks are always attended by at least one parent. Chicks are very mobile and move around the area of the nesting site, following the parents down to the wrack (seaweed level) at low tide. Even young chicks may move as far as 30 to 50 meters from the nesting site.
Fledglings. Black Oystercatcher chicks fledge (develop the ability to fly) within 38 to 40 days.
Fledglings can spend from 3 to as much as 6 months with their parents in order to learn basic foraging and survival skills, before the parents chase them out of their territory in order prepare for the new breeding season. Fledglings continue to develop foraging skills for at least 12 months; sub-adults may require more than three years to master a complete repertoire of efficient foraging skills comparable to those of adults.
Food & Feeding. Black Oystercatchers feed on a variety of intertidal invertebrates including limpets, mussels, chitons, crabs, barnacles, and other small intertidal animals. Black Oystercatcher chicks are fed by their parents until they are close to fledging. At that time, the large chick will start to be capable of foraging to some degree on its own. The parents initially feed tiny young by bringing them pieces of shellfish meat small enough for the chicks to consume. A chick will take the food either directly from the parent’s beak or from the ground where the parent intentionally drops it. Older chicks and fledglings that have developed some minimal foraging skills will still take food from their parents’ beaks whether or not the food is offered to them.
Pair Bonds. It takes 4 to 5 years for a Black Oystercatcher to reach breeding age; after that, strong pair bonds are formed. With an estimated life span of about 10 to 15 years, each adult may then have 5 to 10+ years to replace itself in order for the population to remain stable. Black Oystercatchers usually mate for life, but re-mating can occur.
Territories. Black Oystercatchers are highly territorial. Once a pair has formed, they face establishing a territory in an environment where other Black Oystercatcher pairs already occupy most of the prime habitat. Once a territory is established, the pair will vigorously defend it from all other Black Oystercatchers.
PG CC 12/21/22
138 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 47 Fledging Success. In January 2018, National Audubon completed an assessment of Black Oystercatcher literature (primarily from Alaska and British Columbia) and development of an initial population model. Based on their analysis, they hypothesize that annual reproductive success (no. of fledglings/no. of breeding pairs) greater than about 0.70 (70%) is likely a good sign for a local population, while reproductive success of less than about 0.35 (35%) indicates a population at risk. For the past four breeding seasons (2014-2017), the reproductive success rate for the Black Oystercatcher pairs monitored on the southern coast of the Monterey Bay region has ranged from 0.14 to 0.21 (14% to 21%), while the pairs monitored on the northern coast of Monterey Bay region ranged from 0.82 to 1.40 (82% to 140%). Thus, while the north coast is doing very well, the south coast — including Pacific Grove — is faring very poorly. The overall success rate for the entire California coast is about 0.45 (45%).
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
BLACK OYSTERCATCHER PROTECTION PROTOCOL
This document has been prepared by:
CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST BLACK OYSTERCATCHER PROJECT
/s/ Herrick E. Hanks
________________________________________ _____________________ Herrick E. Hanks, Project Coordinator Date
I have reviewed and concur with this document:
MONTEREY PENINSULA AUDUBON SOCIETY
________________________________________ _____________________ Blake Matheson, President Date
PG CC 12/21/22
139 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 48 Appendix C. Known non-native plants
Non-native Plant Species along Pacific Grove Coastline
This list is not comprehensive, but represents the species that rapidly take over the more beneficial native plant communities. Removal of these species should occur everywhere except Perkins Park, the long, linear shoreline park that extends from Lovers Point to Esplanade Park.
The City is in the process of developing a landscape plan for this section and it may include non-native species to maintain the history of the park. Future replacement of some of the Perkins Park non-native plant areas may be broached in the future.
Common Name Species Name
Aloe Aloe maculata
Red Aloe Aloe cameronii
Iceplant Carpobrotus edulis
Narrow-leaved Iceplant Conicosia pugioniformis
Magic Carpet Drosanthemum floribundum
New Zealand Spinach Tetragonia tetragonioides
Appendix D. Local conservation organizations
List of conservation organizations whose efforts complement the CWPAC recommendations and whose work should be supported and promoted:
- Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary
- Bay Net
- TeamOCEAN
- First Flush
- NOAA NCCOS Phytoplankton Monitoring Network (PMN)
- Monterey Bay Sanctuary Citizen Watershed Monitoring Network - Save Our Shores
- California Coastal Cleanup Day
- Monterey Audubon Society
- Black Oystercatcher Monitoring Project
- Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History
- LiMPETS
- Friends of Hopkins Marine Station
- MPA Watch
- Marine Life Studies
- Sea Otter Savvy
- Sustainable Pacific Grove
- Monterey Bay Aquarium
PG CC 12/21/22
140 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 49 Appendix E. Map of state Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) surrounding Pacific Grove PG CC 12/21/22
141 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 50 Appendix F. Map of Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary PG CC 12/21/22
142 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 51 Appendix G. Coastal species list
As species ranges shift due to the effects of climate change and/or habitat alteration, the wildlife species we currently see and enjoy may no longer inhabitat the specific areas we are concerned with. Sources to determine which species live within a region at any time include iNaturalist (https://www.inaturalist.org), eBird (https://ebird.org), MARINe (https://marine.ucsc.edu), and others.
Current list of known wildlife species that live within Pacific Grove coastline area:
Terrestrial invertebrates (2 of many)
Common name Scientific name
Banana Slug Ariolimax brachyphallus
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Rocky Shore invertebrates (partial list)
Data collected by the Multi-Agency Rocky Intertidal Network (MARINe): a long-term ecological consortium funded & supported by many groups. See pacificrockyintertidal.org for a complete list of MARINe partners. Data management is primarily supported by Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, National Parks Service, The David & Lucile Packard Foundation, & the US Navy.
Invertebrates
Family Scientific Name
Annelids: polychaete worms Phragmatopoma/Sabellaria spp Pista spp
Serpula vermicularis
Spirobranchus spinosus
Spirorbis spp
Arthropods: barnacles, crabs, etc. Balanus glandula
Cancer antennarius
Chthamalus dalli/fissus
Cirolana spp
Hemigrapsus nudus
Idotea spp
Ligia spp
Pachycheles spp
Pachygrapsus crassipes
Pagurus caurinus
Pagurus granosimanus
Pagurus hirsutiusculus
Pagurus samuelis
PG CC 12/21/22
143 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 52 Pollicipes polymerus
Pugettia producta
Pycnogonida
Semibalanus cariosus
Tetraclita rubescens
Bryozoans: moss animals Bugula neritina
Eurystomella bilabiata
Membranipora spp
Chordates: sea squirts Aplidium spp
Distaplia occidentalis
Eudistoma psammion
Ritterella rubra
Ritterella spp
Cnidarians: sea anemones,
hydroids
Abietinaria spp
Anthopleura elegantissima
Anthopleura sola
Anthopleura xanthogrammica
Epiactis prolifera
Symplectoscyphus turgidus
Echinoderms: sea stars, sea
urchins
Henricia spp
Leptasterias spp
Patiria miniata
Pisaster giganteus
Pisaster ochraceus
Pycnopodia helianthoides
Strongylocentrotus purpuratus
Molluscs: chitons, snails & limpets,
mussels
Acanthinucella spp
Acmaea mitra
Alia spp
Amphissa versicolor
Bittium eschrichtii
Cadlina luteomarginata
Calliostoma canaliculatum
Calliostoma ligatum
Cryptochiton stelleri
Cyanoplax hartwegii
Cyanoplax spp
Epitonium tinctum
Fissurella volcano
Homalopoma spp
Katharina tunicata
PG CC 12/21/22
144 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 53 Lacuna spp
Lepidozona spp
Lirularia/Margarites spp
Littorina spp.
Lottia austrodigitalis/digitalis
Lottia fenestrata
Lottia limatula
Lottia ochracea
Lottia paradigitalis/strigatella
Lottia pelta
Lottia scabra/conus
Lottia scutum
Mopalia spp
Mytilus californianus
Mytilus spp
Nucella canaliculata
Nucella emarginata/ostrina
Nuttallina spp
Ocenebra circumtexta
Ocenebra interfossa
Ocinebrina lurida
Onchidella borealis
Phidiana hiltoni
Pseudomelatoma torosa
Serpulorbis squamigerus
Tegula brunnea
Tegula funebralis
Tegula gallina/funebralis
Tonicella spp
Poriferans: sponges Aplysina fistularis
Halichondria spp
Haliclona spp
Ophlitaspongia pennata
Herpetofauna
Common Name Scientific Name
Coast Garter Snake Thamnophis elegans terrestris
Northern Alligator Lizard Elgaria coerulea
Northern Legless Lizard Anniella pulchra
Sierran Tree Frog Pseudacris sierra
Western Fence Lizard Sceloporus occidentalis
PG CC 12/21/22
145 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 54 Birds
Common Name Scientific Name
American Kestrel Falco sparverius
Belted Kingfisher Megaceryle alcyon
Black Oystercatcher Haematopus bachmani
Black Turnstone Arenaria melanocephala
Black Phoebe Sayornis nigricans
Black-bellied Plover Pluvialis squatarola
Bonaparte's Gull Chroicocephalus philadelphia
Brandt's Cormorant Phalacrocorax penicillatus
Brewer's Blackbird Euphagus cyanocephalus
Brown Pelican Pelecanus occidentalis
Brown-headed Cowbird Molothrus ater
California Gull Larus californicus
California Scrub-Jay Aphelocoma californica
California Thrasher Toxostoma redivivum
Caspian Tern Hydroprogne caspia
Common Yellowthroat Geothlypis trichas
Double-crested Cormorant Phalacrocorax auritus
Dunlin Calidris alpina
Elegant Tern Thalasseus elegans
Glaucous-winged Gull Larus glaucescens
Great Egret Ardea alba
Heermann's Gull Larus heermanni
Herring Gull Larus argentatus
Iceland Gull Larus glaucoides
Killdeer Charadrius vociferus
Lincoln's Sparrow Melospiza lincolnii
Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa
Marsh Wren Cistothorus palustris
Merlin Falco columbarius
Mew Gull Larus canus
Northern Harrier Circus hudsonius
Osprey Pandion haliaetus
Pacific Golden-Plover Pluvialis fulva
Pelagic Cormorant Phalacrocorax pelagicus
Red Phalarope Phalaropus fulicarius
Red-shouldered Hawk Buteo lineatus
Red-tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis
Red-winged Blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus
Ruddy Turnstone Arenaria interpres
Sanderling Calidris alba
Say's Phoebe Sayornis saya
Semipalmated Plover Charadrius semipalmatus
Snowy Plover Charadrius nivosus
Snowy Egret Egretta thula
Song Sparrow Melospiza melodia
Spotted Sandpiper Actitis macularius
Steller's Jay Cyanocitta stelleri
PG CC 12/21/22
146 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 55 Surfbird Calidris virgata
Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura
Wandering Tattler Tringa incana
Western Gull Larus occidentalis
Western Meadowlark Sturnella neglecta
Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus
White-crowned Sparrow Zonotrichia leucophrys
White-tailed Kite Elanus leucurus
Yellow-rumped Warbler Setophaga coronata
Mammals
Common Name Scientific Name
Botta's Pocket Gopher Thomomys bottae
Brush Rabbit Sylvilagus bachmani
California Ground Squirrel Otospermophilus beecheyi
California Sea Lion Zalophus californianus
California Vole Microtus californicus
Columbian Black-tailed Deer Odocoileus hemionus ssp. columbianus Pacific Harbor Seal Phoca vitulina
Southern Sea Otter Enhydra lutris nereis
PG CC 12/21/22
147 of 332
CWPAC Mitigation of Threats to Mitigate Identified Threats to Coastal Wildlife 56 References and Resources
California Coastal Commission. Sea-Level Rise Policy Guidance; Interpretive Guidelines for Addressing Sea-Level Rise in Local Coastal Programs and Coastal Development Permits. Final Adopted Science Update. 2018 Nov. Available online:
https://www.coastal.ca.gov/climate/slrguidance.html
California Natural Resources Agency. Safeguarding California Plan: 2018 Update; California’s Climate Adaptation Strategy. 2018 Jan. Available from:
https://resources.ca.gov/CNRALegacyFiles/docs/climate/safeguarding/update2018/safeguardin g-california-plan-2018-update.pdf
City of Pacific Grove (PG) Shoreline Management Plan. 2020 June. Available from:
https://08066a59-3fdf-4476-8dbf2a8aa143f4db.filesusr.com/ugd/06d7f0_d75c916e3731492eb6e35e423747d5ee.pdf Ocean Protection Council (OPC). State of California Sea-Level Rise Guidance Update. http://www.opc.ca.gov/webmaster/ftp/pdf/agenda_items/20180314/Item3_ExhibitA_OPC_SLR_Guidance-rd3.pdf Ocean Protection Council (OPC). Strategic Plan to Protect California’s Coast and Ocean 2020- 2025. 2019 Jan. Available from:
http://www.opc.ca.gov/webmaster/ftp/pdf/agenda_items/20200226/OPC-2020-2025-StrategicPlan-FINAL-20200228.pdf Rebolo-Ifrán, Natalia, Maricel Grana Grilli, and Sergio A. Lambertucci. 2019. Drones as a Threat to Wildlife: YouTube Complements Science in Providing Evidence about Their Effect.
Environmental Conservation 46.3 (2019):205-210. Available from:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333790087_Drones_as_a_Threat_to_Wildlife_YouTub e_Complements_Science_in_Providing_Evidence_about_Their_Effect Vas, Elisabeth, Amelie Lescroel, Olivier Duriez, Guillaume, Boguszewski, and David Gremillet. 2015.l. Approaching birds with drones: first experiments and ethical guidelines. Biology letters
11.2 (2015): 20140754. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0754 PG CC 12/21/22
148 of 332
1 Proposed Local Coastal Program Amendments to Implement Coastal Wildlife Protection Advisory Committee Recommendations Including Other Proposed Amendments and Corrections [1] Pacific Grove Local Coastal Program (LCP)
Certified - March 11, 2020
Amended - August 12, 2021
PART I: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS AND CORRECTIONS
Amended text shown in underscored text, and deleted text shown in strikeout text.
Narrative shown in blue text.
LCP LUP CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1) Section 1.10 (page 22): TERMINOLOGY USED IN THE LAND USE PLAN, revise as follows:
(Reflects Coastal Staff’s reorganization of Implementation Plan in summer 2017, which relies on specificity in the LUP for many coastal resource protections.)
Implementation Plan (IP): Includes coastal resource protection standards that conform with and carry out the Land Use Plan. Other implementing actions which conform with and carry out the goals, policies, and recommendations of the certified Land Use Plan can be found in the Land Use Plan itself. [Note: A table is necessary to show which policies are implemented in the LUP and which are implemented in the IP, and in what specific LUP policy or IP ordinance.] Effective standards and procedures ensure that the objectives of the Land Use Plan are achieved.
LCP LUP CHAPTER 2: NATURAL SYSTEMS AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT LUP Section 2.1: COASTAL HAZARDS (HAZ):
2) CWPAC Recommendation #3: Coastal bluff erosion
For coastal development, use soft engineering alternatives (e.g., beach nourishment, dune restoration, etc.) described in the 2012 Evaluation of Erosion Mitigation Alternatives for PG CC 12/21/22
149 of 332
2 Southern Monterey Bay instead of hard engineering approaches (e.g., seawalls and riprap) where practicable.
Note: This recommendation has limited application in Pacific Grove because the 2012 Evaluation only looked at sandy beaches from Wharf II in Monterey to Moss Landing. The 2016 Economic Impacts of Climate Adaptation Strategies for Southern Monterey Bay (Nature Conservancy) also only addressed sandy shorelines. An LCP policy is needed to work with the Center for a Blue Economy at MIIS to initiate a study to analyze adaptation strategies for Pacific Grove’s granite coastline with pocket beaches. 3), 4) CWPAC Recommendation #5: Climate Change, Coastal bluff erosion Move major infrastructure (e.g., roads, sewer lines, utilities) farther inland from City shorelines in a managed retreat from sea-level rise.
Note: An LCP policy is needed to prioritize planning for managed retreat to allow for the natural realignment of the shoreline due to sea level rise. This includes actively restoring or enhancing the coastline to promote wildlife preservation as part of the retreat process. Another LCP policy is needed to remove human-made debris and infrastructure before the underlying sediment is lost due to sea level rise, to avoid leaving infrastructure debris in what will need to transform into new, healthy, functioning sandy or rocky beach habitat for coastal wildlife.
5) Section 2.1.4 (page 35): LUP Policies – COASTAL HAZARDS AND SEA LEVEL RISE, add policy HAZ-X following policy HAZ-6:
(Adds a new policy following HAZ-6, identifying causes of erosion and appropriate responses.) The priority for responding to erosion is to address the causes of the erosion: ground squirrels or gophers; coastline landscape irrigation; Highway ice plant (Carpobrotus edulis) and Red aloe (Aloe cameronii ); urban runoff; groundwater seepage; human foot traffic; storm surge and extreme high tide; and sea level rise.
Acceptable responses include, as appropriate: rodent control measures (avoiding poison, which can harm other wildlife or domestic animals and the Marine Sanctuary); cessation of landscape watering along the shoreline (with minimal exceptions for restoration and maintenance of Drosanthemum floribundum in Perkins Park); removal of Highway ice plant, which is habitat for ground squirrels (avoiding poison and not disturbing archaeological sites), and replacement with native bluff plants; removal of large aloes in a manner that doesn’t harm the coastal banana slug; redirection of stormwater or urban runoff; educational signage and symbolic fencing to keep people on trails in sensitive areas; planning for retreat; or, as a last resort, shoreline protective devices.
6) Section 2.1.4 (page 35): LUP Policies – Coastal Hazards and SLR, add policy HAZ-Y following policy HAZ-7:
PG CC 12/21/22
150 of 332
3 (Adds a new policy elevating the importance of preserving the natural living shoreline; describing negative impacts of riprap; restricting permitting of armoring. The first sentence was included in the City’s draft LCP’s from February 2016 until October 2018.)
The Pacific Grove shoreline is an irreplaceable sensitive resource area and its preservation as a natural living shoreline is a matter of paramount public importance.
Large boulders used for riprap revetments destroy the native biota of the intertidal zone, provide habitat for rodents, and detract from the scenic beauty of the native rock formations and sandy beaches. Seawalls and retaining walls disrupt natural shoreline processes. To protect the natural beauty of the coastline while allowing the natural shoreline processes to continue, new shoreline protective devices shall only be permitted when there are no feasible alternatives with less environmentally significant impacts.
LUP Section 2.2: WATER AND MARINE RESOURCES (MAR):
7) Section 2.2.4 (page 42): LUP Policies – MAR-2, insert additional text:
(Specifies the minimum buffer area for projects near wetlands.) Wetlands including Crespi Pond and the Majella Slough riparian area shall be considered as Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas, and governed by Coastal Act policies 30233, 30236, and 30240. No alteration of freshwater wetlands (including Crespi Pond and Majella Slough, and required buffer areas of 100 feet or more) shall be allowed, except for maintenance dredging and similar activities essential for restoration and/or enhancement of natural habitats, as well as other uses and development specified in the Biological Resources and Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas chapter of this Land Use Plan (see BIO-4), and only where there is no feasible less environmentally damaging alternative, and where feasible mitigation measures have been provided to minimize adverse environmental effects. Reintroduce native wetland grasses around the Pond. Work with California State University Monterey Bay graduate level watershed classes to study the wetlands for guidance and updates, and potential restoration options. Reconstitute a Crespi Pond Advisory Committee and include Majella Slough. 8) Section 2.2.4 (page 42): LUP Policies – MAR-3, add to end of first bullet point:
(Adds specificity and clarification consistent with Coastal Act Sections 30231 and 30233(c).) No diking, filling, dredging, or other uses inconsistent with the terms of the grant of tidal protection from the State of California or Coastal Act Policy 30233 shall be allowed in the City’s tidelands. Diking, filling, draining and dredging of coastal waters can have significant adverse impacts on water quality, marine habitats and organisms, and scenic features, and shall be strictly limited to restoration of the natural systems.
PG CC 12/21/22
151 of 332
4 9) Section 2.2.4 (page 43): LUP Policies – MAR-5, add text:
(Provides added specificity and protection for Pacific Grove’s uniquely diverse and species rich marine habitats consistent with Coastal Act Section 30230.)
Marine resources shall be maintained, enhanced, and where feasible, restored. Marine and aquatic resources shall be considered as Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas. Special protection shall be given to required for all areas of the marine environment and species and areas of special biological significance. Uses of the marine environment shall be carried out in a manner that will sustain the biological productivity and ecological integrity of coastal waters bluffs, beaches, tidepools, intertidal and subtidal areas, and coastal waters and wetlands and that will maintain healthy populations of all species of marine organisms adequate for longterm commercial, recreational, scientific, and educational purposes. 10) Section 2.3.1 (page 44-45): Background – Scenic Resources The rocky islets jutting out to the northwest are part of the California Coastal National Monument. They are surrounded with dramatic, algal-covered intertidal rocks, and tidepools that draw visitors from around the world. The Great Tidepool, located on the southwest corner of Lighthouse Reservation, is a significant site because it is central to the data Ed Ricketts collected when developing his ideas about ecology and habitats and in writing his world famous text Between Pacific Tides. John Steinbeck accompanied his friend Ricketts on many expeditions to the Great Tidepool and brought further international attention to the location in his novel Cannery Row.
LUP SECTION 2.3: SCENIC RESOURCES (SCE):
11) Figure 4 (page 47), Scenic Areas map—revise to show additional scenic coastal areas:
Lighthouse Reservation, Asilomar State Park [Note: See Asilomar General Plan, Visual Resources and Scenic Characteristics, https://www.parks.ca.gov/pages/21299/files/asilomarsb_gp_eir_1-2004.pdf, pages 2-37 to 2-41], and the Pacific Grove Retreat. (Brings map into consistency with policy SCE-3 and the Asilomar General Plan.)
12) SCE-3 (page 48): revise as follows:
(Adds specificity consistent with SCE-3 and the Asilomar General Plan.) Where appropriate, Protect the visual qualities of special communities and neighborhoods including Asilomar Dunes Neighborhood, Asilomar State Park [Note: See Asilomar General Plan as above], and the Pacific Grove Retreat, that because of their unique characteristics, are popular visitor destination points for recreational uses or are locally important historic areas.
PG CC 12/21/22
152 of 332
5 13) SCE-4 (page 48): revise as follows:
(Adds scenic areas included in items #9 & #10 above and removes superfluous language.) The portion of Pacific Grove’s Coastal Zone designated as having special scenic significance (i.e. scenic areas or scenic public view areas or scenic public view points) includes all areas designated on Figure 4 Scenic Areas [Note: map to be revised per item #9 above], including: all public view areas along Pacific Grove’s shoreline; views from the sea; areas seaward of Ocean View Boulevard and Sunset Drive, ; the Pacific Grove Retreat; Lighthouse Reservation lands and Point Pinos Lighthouse; Asilomar State Beach and Conference Grounds, including Asilomar Dune Natural Preserve, visible from Sunset Drive, native pine forest and oak woodlands, and the National Historic Landmark District architecture of Julia Morgan along with the John Carl Warnecke Historic District; the Asilomar Dunes residential area; lands fronting the east side of Sunset Drive,; and the forest-front zone between Asilomar Avenue and the crest of the high dune (from the north side of Pico Avenue intersection to Sinex Avenue); public street ends along Central Avenue and other areas in which future study may support special scenic significance designation. The City shall consider and protect the visual quality of these special scenic areas as a resource of public importance.
14)SCE-10 (page 49-50): revise as follows [replaces insufficient protection measure with standard protection measure]:
The scenic native forest within Asilomar Conference Grounds, along Asilomar Avenue, and within the Union Pacific railroad right-of-way, shall be protected and retained, to the maximum feasible degree, consistent with the uses allowed by the Land Use Plan….Retained trees that are located close to construction areas shall be protected from inadvertent damage by construction equipment through wrapping of trunks with protective materials fencing one foot beyond the dripline, bridging or tunneling under major roots where exposed in foundation or utility trenches, and other measures appropriate and necessary to protect the well-being of the retained trees.
LUP SECTION 2.4: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE HABITAT AREAS (BIO):
15) Section 2.4.1 (pages 50-51): Background – Biological Resources and ESHA, reorganize bullet points and expand ESHA following the last sentence of the first paragraph, as follows:
(Adds specificity lacking in Biological Resources and ESHA section and LCP Background Report to guide the City in protecting Pacific Grove’s extraordinary biodiversity. First and last sentences of introduction are included for context.)
Environmentally Sensitive Habitat and Biological Sensitivity PG CC 12/21/22
153 of 332
6 Coastal Act Section 30107.5 defines Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area as “…any area in which plant or animal life or their habitats are either rare or especially valuable because of their special nature or role in an ecosystem and which could be easily disturbed or degraded by human activities and developments…. Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area can include several types of sensitive habitats which require careful management to protect native resident and migratory species. Sensitive habitats and species include the following:
Native Monterey pine forest which includes large stands of trees (often in association with sand dunes, a lower canopy dominated by Coast live oak, understory forest species, and ground cover of low herbaceous plants) that extend into Pacific Grove from the Del Monte Forest and represent one of only four places on earth where such native Monterey pine forest exists, and which also provides crucial nesting and foraging habitat for such species as Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus), amphibians including the Monterey Ensatina, Slender-legged Salamander, and Sierra Tree Frog, and Black-tailed deer (for whom acorns are an important food source) and their nurseries. A suite of migratory and resident bird species native to the Western US relies on Pacific Grove’s native Monterey Pine forest, heavily, and encompasses species protected under California and Federal law. These species include but are not limited to: Pygmy Nuthatch, Chestnut-backed Chickadee, Townsend’s Warbler, Hermit Warbler, Hutton’s Vireo, Wrentit, Pacific-slope Flycatcher, Olive-sided Flycatcher (a California Species of Special Concern, CDFW 2008), Steller’s Jay, Western California Scrub-Jay, Pacific Wren, Bewick’s Wren, Oak Titmouse, California Thrasher, Nuttall’s Woodpecker, Hairy Woodpecker, Acorn Woodpecker, Band-tailed Pigeon, Violet-green Swallow, Allen’s Hummingbird, California Towhee, Spotted Towhee, Dark-eyed Oregon Junco, Western Bluebird, Whitetailed Kite and the California Coastal race of Red-shouldered Hawk; Wetlands and waterways features as defined by Coastal Act section 30121, including Majellah Slough or the coastal brackish marsh Majella Creek Marsh, which provides valuable riparian habitat within the Asilomar State Beach and Conference Grounds.
Crespi Pond is another wetland which supports a significant patch of dense freshwater marsh vegetation dominated by broad-leaved cattail and California bulrush, and which also provides foraging and nesting habitat for local and migratory birds such as Redwinged Blackbird, Great Egret, Great Blue Heron, Black-crowned Night-heron, Sora, Virginia Rail, Marsh Wren, and Common Yellowthroat, as well as other native aquatic species. Crespi Pond becomes an especially important resting and sheltering area during migration and winter when an array of visiting waterfowl and shorebirds utilize the fresh water habitat. Willow margins around Majella Slough form a riparian corridor surrounded by dune systems that are of particular importance to migratory songbirds year-round. Riparian-dependent species have undergone significant population declines, range-wide, in recent years, elevating the importance of this habitat type. The Majella system hosts large numbers of Yellow Warbler -a California Species of Special Concernalong with other western passerines, both during and outside nesting season, including Wilson’s Warbler, Warbling Vireo, Common Yellowthroat and many others. The slough’s outflow into Asilomar State Beach provides sheltering and foraging habitat for a range PG CC 12/21/22
154 of 332
7 of waders including Herons, Egrets, and highly migratory shorebirds like Western Sandpiper, Least Sandpiper, Greater Yellowlegs, Wilson’s Snipe and many others; and Coastal sand dunes and sand dune areas such as the Asilomar Dunes, which are themselves a scarce and rare resource and also provide critical habitat for such species rare forms as black legless lizards (Anniella pulchra nigra), Menzies’ wallflower, Monterey spineflower (Chorizanthe pungens), and Tidestrom’s lupine (Lupinus tidestromii) and other listed species, and provide nesting and foraging habitat for Killdeer and foraging habitat for Western Meadowlark, the local coast chaparraldependent nuttali subspecies of White-crowned sparrow, and others, as well as wildlife corridors for Black-tailed deer;
Coastal bluff scrub and coastal dune scrub which have been restored in many areas along the Asilomar and Point Pinos coastlines, and provide foraging habitat for Northern Harrier during migration and winter (a California Species of Special Concern), Whitetailed Kite, American Kestrel, Merlin, Red-shouldered Hawk, Red-tailed Hawk, and others;
Granitic rock outcrops and offshore rocks, reefs, and islets which provide nesting habitat for Western Gull and Black Oystercatcher, roosting habitat for California Brown Pelican, Elegant and Caspian Terns, Heermann’s Gull and cormorants (Brandt’s, Doublecrested, and Pelagic), and haul-outs for Harbor seals; The shore-side rocky coast and its kelp wracks and intertidal areas which constitute vital foraging habitat for migratory and wintering populations of rocky coast obligate species including Black Turnstone, Ruddy Turnstone, Sanderling, Willet, Whimbrel, Marbled Godwit, Black-bellied Plover, Surfbird, and Wandering Tattler, as well as for resident Black Oystercatchers;
Sandy beaches which provide habitat for Federal and State Endangered List Western Snowy Plover (Charadrius nivosus nivosus), other local and migratory shorebirds including Whimbrel, Sanderling, Marbled Godwit, and Black-bellied Plover, and the Harbor seal haul-outs and rookeries;
The sea, including Iintertidal and subtidal areas including and kelp forests, which provides habitat for numerous plants, invertebrates, and fishes, as well as birds and marine mammals, including Great Egret, Snowy Egret, Great Blue Heron, Elegant Tern, other resident and migratory seabirds, seals, sea lions, dolphins and whales (notably Humpback and Gray whale and Orca), and Southern sea otter; and Generally, the greater Point Pinos Area and the collected habitat niches it includes, situated on the Pacific Flyway within the central California Nearshore and San Mateo/Monterey Important Bird Areas (IBA’s) in a unique coastal location at the northwestern tip of the Monterey Peninsula and the edge of Monterey Bay near its submarine canyon, which attracts both breeding species and (especially) migratory species of birds which pass through the area in spring and fall migrations, as well as seabirds that are often pushed near the Pacific Grove shoreline in high winds, resulting in a documented list of 349 species of birds within the boundaries of Pacific Grove, giving the city one of the highest municipal bird lists on the continent.
PG CC 12/21/22
155 of 332
8 16) Figure 5 (page 53): Land Habitat Sensitivity Map, correct the most outstanding errors until map can be updated:
(For example, in Area III, the Monarch Pines mobile home park and surroundings should be “D. Low” sensitivity; and in Area VI, Asilomar State Park’s Monterey pine forest should be “B. High” sensitivity or “A. Extreme” sensitivity. Currently, both areas are depicted as “C. Moderate” sensitivity. The entire shoreline, whether granite bluffs and outcrops or sand or rock beaches, should be designated ESHA to some degree.) 17) Section 2.4.4 (page 60): add BIO-W (between BIO-5 and BIO-6):
(Adds a new policy protecting intertidal habitat, with specifics about the sensitive coastal resources.) BIO-W: Preserve and maintain marine habitats—rocky intertidal, tide pool, kelp forest—in accordance with Municipal Code 14.04.010-030 and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Marine Protected Areas that border the coast of Pacific Grove. Intertidal areas include a high diversity of algae, invertebrates, and fishes in tide pools and on boulders and rocky outcrops and are sensitive to trampling and other types of disturbance. 18) CWPAC recommendation #2: Problematic species
Prioritize removing problematic non-native plants in coastal areas (such as aloes, iceplant, and New Zealand spinach) and replace with native plants, essentially extending the restored Asilomar State Beach dunes and rocky shore habitat north and north-east along the rest of the Pacific Grove shoreline.
Note: Combine this recommended policy with recommended policy in item 19 below. 19) CWPAC Recommendation #4: Species of Concern Needing Protection Replace lost coastal wildlife habitat through habitat restoration with the goal of no net loss of habitat.
Note: A policy is needed to address the effects of non-native invasive plant species along the coastline which have replaced native species and provide little benefit to the local ecology.
Certain populations of native wildlife have become unnaturally abundant because of human activities on the coastline, including American crow, California ground squirrel, raccoon, and others, with severe negative effects on the broader native wildlife community and a significant loss of local biodiversity.
CWPAC recommendation could be added to BIO-6,provided here, or follow it as a separate policy:
LCP LUP Policy BIO-6: Invasive non-native plants, such as Pampas grass, Acacia, Genista, and non-native ice plant, pose a threat to the indigenous plant community and are prohibited in any landscaping plan.
PG CC 12/21/22
156 of 332
9 20) Section 2.4.4 (page 60): BIO-7, add as follows:
(Adds characteristic fauna consistent with Section 2.4.1, Background, Characteristic Flora and Fauna, pages 54-55.) The City shall preserve its character-defining flora and fauna, such as Rosy ice plant (Drosanthemum floribundum), Monterey pine, Monterey cypress, Coast Live Oak, Monarch butterfly, Black-tailed deer, Harbor seal, Southern Sea Otter, Humpback and Gray whale, Brown Pelican, and Cormorant (Brandt’s, Double-crested, and Pelagic) and Black Oystercatcher. 21) Section 2.4.4 (page 60): BIO-8, add as follows:
(Corrects requirement for encouraging planting suitable for all life stages of Monarchs, since Pacific Grove is not part of milkweed’s historic range, and planting of milkweed within 5 miles of the coast could disrupt the Monarchs’ natural migratory patterns. The policy should require the City to consult with the PG Museum of Natural History, Xerces Society, and CDFW before recommending specific plants, to discourage planting of milkweed and to stay abreast of and follow current recommendations for aiding in the recovery of the Monarch population, since the Pacific Grove Monarch Sanctuary is the largest public monarch overwintering site in Monterey County.) The City shall protect habitats for the overwintering Monarch butterfly population in Pacific Grove and encourage the planting and preservation of vegetation useful to all appropriate life stages of the Monarch butterfly, including the planting and preservation of native flowering plants, specifically ones that will provide nectar during the Monarchs’ overwintering stay from fall into spring. Planting of milkweed near coastal overwintering sites could disrupt the Monarchs’ natural migratory cycle. Pesticides can harm Monarchs and their use should be discouraged. The City will ensure that any new development within the Coastal Zone in proximity to trees or vegetation used by butterflies throughout their life cycle will not adversely affect the butterflies or their habitat.
22) Section 2.4.4 (page 61): Adds sentence about noise disturbance of harbor seals.
BIO-11. The City will implement seal pupping protection measures, including installation of split rail fencing, installation of temporary “no climb” wood lattice fencing or other alternative that provides visual access, and educational signage if found necessary to prevent harm or harassment of harbor seals during the spring pupping season generally February through May, at various locations along the Pacific Grove shoreline east of Berwick Park and immediately adjacent to the Pacific Grove Recreation Trail. Noise impacts to the seals, particularly to pregnant seals and pups, will also be considered in determining permit conditions of approval.
Impacts to public access from such measures shall be minimized. In addition, the City may use trained volunteer docents, including National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration trained Bay Net volunteer docents when available, to educate and engage the public on the activities of the seals, and to monitor and document all activities in the vicinity of the program, including any unauthorized human interruptions.
23) Section 2.4.4 (page 61-62): between BIO-12 and BIO-13, add a new policy BIO-X consistent with CWPAC recommendation #1:
PG CC 12/21/22
157 of 332
10 BIO-X: Decrease human disturbance to coastal wildlife by reducing access to rocky outcrops and sensitive wildlife breeding areas, both year-round or seasonally. [CWPAC adds, “especially in the 6 identified Areas of Special Interest.” However, the entire PG shoreline is foraging habitat for Black Oystercatchers, a keystone species in the rocky intertidal zone. Areas of Special Interest may require more restrictive management for protection of wildlife and habitats.] [Note that BIO-13 states: Any conservation measures intended to protect habitats or species that could reduce public coastal access, including barriers or signs limiting or restricting use of existing lateral and/or vertical accessways, shall require a Coastal Development Permit, and shall include appropriate mitigation measures to reduce any access impacts as much as possible while still achieving the primary conservation goal.] 24)CWPAC recommendation # 6:
BIO-Y: Support existing coastal interpretive programs and community science programs (Appendix D) and/or implement additional stewardship and docent programs that foster public understanding and commitment for conservation measures that preserve the City’s native coastal wildlife.
25) Section 2.4.4 (page 61): add BIO-Z following BIO-11:
(Adds a new policy protecting nesting habitat for native birds during nesting season, based on the LCP Background Report, page 3-35.)
BIO-Z: The entire coastal zone of Pacific Grove contains numerous mature trees, as well as forest floor understory species, dune lands, and rock formations that provide nesting and crucial foraging habitat for various native birds protected by the California Fish and Game Code and/or the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Discretionary tree-trimming not involving trees posing an imminent danger to persons or properties should be discouraged throughout nesting season (generally February 1 to September 15).
26) Section 2.4.4 (page 62):
BIO-18. The City will maintain and enhance the Monterey pine and cypress stands, Coast live oak and canopy within the Coastal Zone to the maximum extent feasible, taking care that new plantings do not adversely affect public views. This program should continue to be updated periodically with a complete inventory of the trees within the Coastal Zone to determine the age of the trees, disease, if any, and the needs for continued reforestation in the City. The City’s 2015 Tree Inventory shall be included as a guiding resource. Best Management Practices for protecting the Critical Root Zone of trees designated for preservation during construction will be carried out, including fencing one foot beyond the dripline. Other measures appropriate and necessary to protect the well-being of the retained trees may be required, such as bridging or tunneling under major roots where exposed in foundation or utility trenches.
LCP LUP CHAPTER 3: BUILT ENVIRONMENT
PG CC 12/21/22
158 of 332
11 27) Section 3.5.1 (page 100): Background – Parks, Recreation, and Public Access, add definition of “Visual Access” following #3, “Vertical Accessway”:
(Adds definition of visual access, which is used in the plan, second sentence in Area I, page 100, and elsewhere, but not defined with other access definitions here.)
4.Visual Access is the provision of public views or scenic vistas to or from the shoreline or sea, or areas of aesthetic scenic quality.
28) Section 3.5.1, Area II (page 102):
From Central Avenue there are clear bay views along many of the local streets. The view down Grand Forest Avenue of the rocks at Lovers Point is especially impressive.
PART II: ADDITIONAL ACTIONS
APPLY FOR CCC APPROVAL OF SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PLAN PER POLICIES HAZ-6, INF-24, AND PRA-4.e.
SUBMIT BLACK OYSTERCATCHER PROTECTION PROTOCOL TO BNRC FOR ADOPTION. (CWPAC APPENDIX B)
Other CWPAC recommendations to respond to ongoing disturbance of wildlife:
1. Increase enforcement of City ordinance 10.10.010, which prohibits the feeding of wildlife [feeding ground squirrels along coast needs to stop]
2. Bird-friendly City, light reduction (night skies ordinance), collisionavoidance glass
3. Drones—best practices guide (folder) for commercial and research pilots/ update drone ordinance
4. Fireworks alternative
5. Covered trash containers
6. Dogs on leash - enforcement
7. Responsible wildlife viewing and photography (including selfies) – at a distance
8. Kayaks - in kelp beds and at HMS (otters and Harbor seals)
9. Crespi Pond and Majella Creek water quality
10. Prioritize Areas of Special Interest—HMS, Lovers Point, Point Pinos, Great Tidepool, Asilomar North and South—while maintaining flexibility for vulnerable wildlife anywhere on the coastline
PG CC 12/21/22
159 of 332
12 UPDATE THE CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENTS OF THE
GENERAL PLAN
CONSOLIDATE WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITAT ORDINANCE INTO A
SINGLE MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE
[1] Corrections prepared by Don Murphy, Robin Aeschliman, John Pearse, Vicki Pearse, and Lisa Ciani in consultation with Ed Clifton and Anthony Ciani, July 2016; updated by Blake Matheson, Vicki Pearse, and Lisa Ciani for the April 2017 draft LUP, August/September 2018; updated by Lisa Ciani for November 2018 draft.
PG CC 12/21/22
160 of 332
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY GRAY DAVIS, GOVERNOR
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
45 FREMONT, SUITE 2000
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105- 2219
VOICE AND TDD (415) 904- 5200
FAX ( 415) 904- 5400
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
POST-CERTIFICATION GUIDE
FOR COASTAL CITIES AND COUNTIES
Revised May 6, 2002
You may request appendices not already included online at (415) 904-5280.
California Coastal Commission - 45 Fremont Street, Suite 2000 - San Francisco, CA 94105 - 415-904-5200 PG CC 12/21/22
161 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
162 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
i
COASTAL COMMISSION OFFICES
Office Address Phone
Headquarters 45 Fremont Street, Suite 2000 (415) 904-5200 San Francisco, CA 94105-2219
North Coast District 710 “E” Street Suite 200 (707) 445-7833 Eureka, CA. 95501
North Central Coast District 45 Fremont Street, Suite 2000 (415) 904-5260 San Francisco, CA 94105-2219
Central Coast District 725 Front Street Suite 300 (831) 427-4863 Santa Cruz, CA. 95060-4058
South Central Coast District 89 S. California Street, Suite 200 (805) 585-1800 Ventura, CA. 93001-2801
South Coast District P.O. Box 1450 (562) 590-5071
200 Oceangate 10th floor
Long Beach, CA. 90802-4325
San Diego Coast District 7575 Metropolitan Drive Ste. 103 (619) 767-2370 San Diego, CA. 92108-4402
Coastal Commission Local Assistance Website
http://www.coastal.ca.gov/la/landx.html
Table of Contents
PG CC 12/21/22
163 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
ii
INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER I. SUMMARY OF POST-CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES ........................................................3 A. LOCAL COASTAL PERMIT PROCESS ................................................................................................................3 B. VIOLATIONS AND ENFORCEMENT...................................................................................................................5 C. LCP AMENDMENTS........................................................................................................................................5 D. COASTAL COMMISSION'S REGULATORY ROLE................................................................................................6 E. PORT, PUBLIC WORKS, AND UNIVERSITY/COLLEGE PLANS............................................................................7 CHAPTER II. COASTAL PERMIT APPLICATIONS........................................................................................9 A. DETERMINING JURISDICTION TYPE.................................................................................................................9 B. PROJECTS STRADDLING JURISDICTION BOUNDARIES....................................................................................12 C. RESOLVING DETERMINATION DISPUTES .......................................................................................................13 CHAPTER III. LOCAL COASTAL PERMIT REVIEW AND ACTION ........................................................15 A. NOTICE OF HEARING OR PENDING ACTION...................................................................................................15 B. NOTICE OF FINAL LOCAL ACTION.................................................................................................................17 CHAPTER IV. APPEALS OF LOCAL DECISIONS .........................................................................................21 A. APPEAL LIMITATIONS ...................................................................................................................................21 B. APPEAL PROCEDURES ..................................................................................................................................22 C. APPEALS BY TWO COMMISSIONERS..............................................................................................................25 CHAPTER V. COMPLIANCE WITH PUBLIC ACCESS AND OPEN SPACE CONDITIONS...................27 CHAPTER VI. LCP AMENDMENTS .................................................................................................................29 A. AMENDMENT TYPES.....................................................................................................................................29 B. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ...........................................................................................................................30 C. COMMISSION REVIEW..............................................................................................................................31 D. OTHER PROVISIONS......................................................................................................................................33 CHAPTER VIII. LOCAL REVIEW OF OTHER COASTAL MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES.....................35 A. FEDERAL CONSISTENCY AUTHORITY: REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES APPROVED, FUNDED OR CARRIED OUT BY FEDERAL AGENCIES...............................................................................................................................................35 B. COASTAL CONSERVANCY PROJECTS ............................................................................................................36 C. PUBLIC WORKS PLANS AND PROJECTS.........................................................................................................36 LIST OF APPENDICES .........................................................................................................................................37 A. LETTER ON CDP JURISDICTION AND INTERPRETATION OF MAPS..................................................................37 B. TABLE OF NOTICE REQUIREMENTS...............................................................................................................37 C. SAMPLE FORMS............................................................................................................................................37 D. LCP AMENDMENT CHECKLIST.....................................................................................................................37 E. FOCUS ON ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM ...........................................................................................................37 PG CC 12/21/22
164 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
1 INTRODUCTION
Following LCP certification, the role of local governments and the Coastal Commission changes. Day-to-day management of the coastal zone becomes a shared responsibility, a partnership with the mutual goal of successful coastal protection. To achieve this post-certification partnership, local governments and the Commission take on new responsibilities.
This Post-Certification Guide is a handbook of these
responsibilities as spelled-out in the Coastal Act and the Commission's Regulations. The Guide does not present any new requirements, but compiles and summarizes existing ones, and gives examples that can be adapted by local government. While this information is intended to serve as a convenient "how to" reference, the requirements of the Coastal Act and Code of Regulations are always determinative if questions arise. Specific post-certification questions can best be addressed by contacting the staff of the applicable District office.
Chapters in the Guide address post-certification activities to be conducted by coastal jurisdictions, including coastal permit processing, Commission appeals, permit monitoring and
enforcement, and LCP amendments. With respect to coastal permit processing, the Guide discusses specific topics such as determining permit and appeal jurisdiction, providing notice, and compliance with public access and open space conditions.
The Post-Certification Guide can be modified and supplemented by additional materials as they become available. Suggestions of other matters that could be incorporated into the Guide are welcome, and should be directed to the Local Assistance staff of the Commission's San Francisco headquarters office.
PG CC 12/21/22
165 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
166 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
3 CHAPTER I. SUMMARY OF POST-CERTIFICATION
PROCEDURES
After LCP certification, a local government assumes responsibility for implementing its LCP. Implementation primarily is the processing of most coastal permit applications, but there are other implementation responsibilities such as enforcing permit requirements and responding to violations. This chapter summarizes procedures relating to these responsibilities that are discussed in detail in this guide. It also reviews the LCP amendment process and the Commission's limited permit role after LCP certification.
A. Local Coastal Permit Process
The coastal permit process is certified as part of the LCP implementing ordinances for each coastal jurisdiction. The process must be consistent with and adequate to carry out the minimum requirements of the Coastal Act and the Commission's
Regulations.
There are four basic stages in the local coastal permit process following LCP Certification:
1. Permit Application,
2. Review and Action,
3. Appeals and Final Action, and
4. Follow-up.
Each of these four stages is summarized below.
1. At the permit application stage, an application for development is received and local staff must make several determinations. Is the development in the coastal zone? Does the applicant need a coastal permit? If a coastal permit is needed, does the local government or the Coastal Commission issue it? Is the local permit decision appealable to the Coastal Commission? The adopted "Post-LCP Certification Permit and Appeal Jurisdiction Map" can help make these determinations, but the controlling factor as to permit jurisdiction remains the Coastal Act language In Public Resources Code Sections 30519 and 30603. (See Appendix A for more information concerning use of these maps) If the
PG CC 12/21/22
167 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
4 determination of a local government as to what type of development is being proposed (i.e. categorically excluded, appealable, non-appealable) is challenged, or if the local government wishes to have a Commission determination as to the appropriate designation, local staff should request a determination from the Coastal Commission's Executive Director (pursuant to Sec. 13569[b] of the Commission's Regulations, contained in Division 5.5 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
If a disagreement remains, the Commission itself will determine permit jurisdiction after a public hearing. The permit application stage is discussed in detail in Chapter II of this Guide.
Absent a permit application, questions concerning the boundary of the Commission's permit and appeal jurisdiction should be referred to the appropriate District Manager of the Commission for clarification and information.
2. At the review and action stage, local staff determines which local body will review and issue the coastal permit (e.g. planning Director, Board of Zoning Adjustment, Planning Commission, City Council, or Board of Supervisors). Local staff also provides notice of public hearing on the application or, if a hearing is not required, notice of the administrative review date. Notice must be provided to adjacent landowners and residents, persons who have expressed interest, and the Commission. The review and action stage is discussed in detail in Chapter III.
3. At the appeals and final local action stage, the initial action may be appealed to a local appellate body. A decision becomes a "final local action" when all required findings have been adopted and there is no further possibility of being appealed to a local appellate body. Local staff then transmits a notice of final local action (NOFA) to the Commission office and interested persons.
The 10-day appeal period begins the day after receipt in the Commission office.
Certain local actions are appealable directly to the Commission.
For these actions, the ten working day Commission appeal period is established from the date of receipt in the Commission office of the notice of final local action. Generally, the local and Commission appeal periods are not concurrent and all local appeals must be exhausted before the Commission will hear an appeal; exceptions are outlined in Chapter IV. When an appeal is made, the Commission will generally take one of the several actions: (i) for certain appeals, determine that the appeal is patently frivolous and PG CC 12/21/22
168 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
5 require a filing fee; (ii) dismiss the appeal on the basis of "no substantial issue" or (iii) accept the appeal and approve, deny, or conditionally approve the coastal permit application. The final action and appeals stages are discussed in detail in Chapters III and IV.
4. At the follow-up stage, for permits that have not been taken on appeal by the Commission, the local government staff determines if pre-issuance (i.e. prior to transmittal) permit conditions are met.
When such conditions have been met, the coastal permit can be issued. Examples of other follow-up activities are: monitoring of coastal permit expiration; compliance monitoring; and processing extensions, revocation requests, and permit amendments. (Certified LCP ordinances should contain noticing and review procedures for processing coastal permit amendments.)
B. Violations and Enforcement
Although any person may maintain an action to enforce provisions of the Coastal Act (pursuant to Section 30804 of the Act), both local governments and the Commission have certain
responsibilities in terms of enforcing certified LCPs. Once an LCP is certified, the Commission retains continuing authority to enforce provisions of the Coastal Act throughout the State's coastal zone.
The local government also has authority to enforce the Coastal Act and LCP within its jurisdiction. Once the local governments assumes responsibility for issuing coastal development permits pursuant to a certified LCP, the Commission expects the local government to play a major role in enforcement within its jurisdiction. (Refer to Appendix E for more information).
Commission staff and the staff of the Attorney General’s office are available to assist local government enforcement efforts. Please contact the Commission's Enforcement staff located in the applicable district office for information regarding enforcement assistance.
C. LCP Amendments
An LCP amendment is needed whenever any portion of a certified LCP is revised. The revision may affect the land use plan (LUP), the implementation program, or both. Substantial revisions will usually affect both LCP components (e.g. both revised land use and zoning designations).
PG CC 12/21/22
169 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
6 There are five steps in processing LCP amendments: (i) the local government proposes an amendment and meets the minimum
requirements for public participation during review; (ii) the local government adopts and submits the proposed amendment, along with necessary supporting materials; (iii) Commission staff reviews the submittal, filing it if complete and determining if it is a minor or de minimis amendment or requires a hearing; (iv) the Commission holds a hearing and votes to certify the amendment; and (v) the local government takes any necessary steps to implement the LCP amendment. An LCP amendment does not take effect until the Commission certifies it. Minor and de minimis amendments are approved administratively, unless the Commission objects to the Executive Director’s determination of the nature of the amendment.
In any year a local government may make only three submittals of major amendments to its certified LCP taken as a whole, i.e., regardless of any segmentation which the Commission may have allowed in processing the LCP (upon final certification of a segmented LCP, reintegration of the segments into a single LCP occurs). Each separate submittal, however, may include many parts. LCP amendments are discussed in detail in Chapter VI.
D. Coastal Commission's Regulatory Role
Following LCP certification, the Commission's role in coastal development regulation is limited to a few well-defined responsibilities. The Commission:
· Retains permit jurisdiction in certain areas, such as state tidelands, submerged lands, public trust lands, and uncertified geographic areas (areas of deferred certification);
· Hears appeals from local actions on appealable developments; · Determines jurisdiction in cases where a local determination is questioned or challenged (Regulations Section 13569); · Enforces permits it issued before LCP certification or from an appeal (see above), or considers amendments or extensions of such permits; and
· Reviews certain federal activities or federally licensed or permitted projects for consistency with the state’s coastal management program under provisions of the federal Coastal Zone Management Act.
PG CC 12/21/22
170 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
7 The Commission also has an ongoing responsibility to monitor LCP implementation. Current post-certification monitoring activities include: reviewing notices of pending local hearings and pending non-hearing actions; reviewing notices of final local action; and providing notice of appealable development to the Commission.
Additionally, Coastal Act Section 30519.5 requires the Commission to review each certified LCP at least once every five years after certification to determine if it is being implemented consistent with the policies of the Coastal Act.
E. Port, Public Works, and University/College Plans
In addition to LCPs, there are other mechanisms to implement provisions of the Coastal Act. These include port master plans, public works plans, and long-range development plans (LRDPs) for state university/college or private university development projects (Coastal Act Sections 30605-30606, 30700-30721).
The Post-Certification Guide, with its focus on the implementation of LCPs, does not discuss Coastal Act requirements regarding development and review of these types of plans. However, if such plans are included within a certified LCP, then coastal permitting may be affected in the area covered by these plans. Additional information on such plans is available from the
Commission's offices.
PG CC 12/21/22
171 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
172 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
9 CHAPTER II. COASTAL PERMIT APPLICATIONS
For each development application, an initial determination by local staff establishes if a coastal permit is needed, who issues the permit, and whether a locally-issued coastal permit is appealable to the Coastal Commission. Accurate determination of permit jurisdiction is crucial to the permit process. The type of jurisdiction determines what public notice must be provided prior to a local action, and may affect the type of information to be supplied by the applicant. This chapter is intended to assist local staffs in making these determinations. It also reviews the procedure to answer questions and resolve disputes over the initial determination process.
A. Determining Jurisdiction Type
The Coastal Act specifies which types of development (and development within certain geographic areas) remain within the Commission's permit jurisdiction after LCP certification (Coastal Act Section 30519). After LCP certification the Commission retains permit jurisdiction in tidelands, submerged lands, public trust lands (filled or unfilled), and areas of deferred certification (i.e. a geographic area where an LCP has not yet been certified by the Commission); however, Coastal Act Section 30613 provides that permit authority on submerged lands, public trust lands that are determined by the Commission to be filled and developed and located within an area committed to urban uses shall be delegated to local government.
Also, development proposed or undertaken in the Ports of Hueneme, Long Beach, Los Angeles or San Diego, within any state university or college in the coastal zone or any development covered by public works plans, remains subject to the
Commission's jurisdiction either through coastal development permits or through certified port master plans, university long range development plans or certified public works plans, as applicable.
In addition, the Commission retains jurisdiction over permits that have been issued by the Commission prior to certification of the LCP and the transfer of permit authority for purposes of condition compliance, enforcement, amendment, reconsideration and revocation.
CCC
Permit
Jurisdiction
PG CC 12/21/22
173 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
10 Where there is a certified LCP, the Commission has appeal jurisdiction over development approved in the following geographic areas: between the sea and the first public road paralleling the sea or within 300 feet of the inland extent of any beach or the mean high tide line where there is no beach, whichever is the greater distance; in areas not included within the foregoing and located within 300 feet of the top of the seaward face of any coastal bluff, or within 100 feet of any wetland, estuary, or stream; or approved development not included within any of these areas but which is located within a sensitive coastal resource area. (Coastal Act Section 30603 [a]).
In addition, specific types of development are appealable to the Commission without regard to geographic location within the coastal zone: an approval or denial decision of a major public works project or major energy facility (defined as costing more than $100,000; (see Commission Regulations Section 13012); and, in coastal counties, the approval of a development that is not designated as "the principal permitted use" in the LCP (Coastal Act Section 30603 [a][4, 5]). The grounds for appeals are described in Chapter IV of this Guide.
To avoid confusion over the location of the geographic boundaries of appealable areas and the Commission's permit jurisdiction, the Commission has adopted criteria for further defining and interpreting these features. These criteria are outlined in Section 13577 of the Commission's Regulations.
At the time of LCP certification, the Commission adopts a map, the "Post-LCP Certification Permit and Appeals Jurisdiction Map”, which portrays the jurisdiction's geographic appeals area features.
While the Commission adopts this map to assist in determining applicable jurisdiction, it is important to emphasize that the requirements of the Coastal Act and Commission Regulations take precedence over the map. The map, illustrating the appealable areas as defined by Coastal Act Section 30603(a)(1) and (2), is useful for initial determinations; however, site visits by local staff may be necessary to make more precise determinations in cases of uncertainty (for example, a proposed project sited on the map's line depicting the edge of an appeals area based on 100 feet from a stream). (See Appendix A for more information).
Below is a series of steps for making an initial determination of coastal permit jurisdiction:
CCC Appeal
Jurisdiction
Post-LCP
Jurisdiction
Map
PG CC 12/21/22
174 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
11 1. Does local government have permit jurisdiction? The Commission retains permit jurisdiction in specific areas, as identified above. Consult the LCP, and Post-Certification Map, make a site visit if necessary and check for any areas of deferred certification. For areas where there may be some question about jurisdiction, coordinate with Commission staff to assist in the determination. In cases where the
Commission retains jurisdiction, local staff should refer the applicant to the appropriate Commission office.
2. Is a coastal permit required? A local coastal permit may not be required pursuant to provisions of an "exemptions and exclusions" section of a certified LCP ordinance. If no local coastal permit is needed for a proposed development, then the permit application would be subject only to the usual local permit process. If the proposed development needs a coastal permit, the next step is applicable. For coastal permits in the Commission’s retained jurisdiction, the
Commission determines if a coastal permit is required.
3. Can it be filed? When a local government has coastal permit jurisdiction, local staff should be sure the applicant has supplied sufficient project information to file the application and allow coastal permit review to commence. If local
government is responsible for issuing the coastal permit, then the fourth step determinations are applicable.
4. Is the local action on the proposed development appealable to the Coastal Commission? Appealable development areas are defined by the Coastal Act and portrayed on the
"Post-LCP Certification Permit and Appeals Jurisdiction Map," but some proposed development is appealable
anywhere in the coastal zone (e.g. a major energy facility or, in the case of coastal counties, development which is not "the principal permitted use"). Other development may be appealable but not mapped on the Commission
post-certification maps. In all cases the Coastal Act Section 30603 defines appealable development.
5. Is the project “in the pipeline” during LCP certification? During the time when an LCP is under review by the
Commission, there may be projects that have received local approval, but that have not yet received a coastal permit from the Commission. Applications submitted to the
Commission, but not yet complete and therefore not filed will be returned to the applicant and must be submitted to the The
process to
determine
jurisdiction
PG CC 12/21/22
175 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
12 local government. Where the application has been found complete and has been filed, applicants have the option of either continuing Coastal Commission processing of their application or withdrawing the submittal and re-filing the application with the local jurisdiction to be heard and decided based on the certified LCP requirements. If the applicant elects to continue with Commission processing, the coastal permit remains under the Commission’s
jurisdiction and in this case the standard of review is the certified LCP. The Commission may determine that the
application as filed may require additional review by the local government and, after consultation with and notice to the local government, remand the application for action
consistent with the certified LCP. Upon effective certification of the LCP, the Commission will accept no applications for development within the certified area.
B. Projects Straddling Jurisdiction Boundaries
1. Projects that are bisected by appeal jurisdiction. If only a portion of the approved development is of the type or in a location that makes the local action appealable, the approval of the local coastal permit is appealable. But the grounds for appeal are limited to allegations that the appealable
development is not consistent with the standards in the certified LCP or the public access policies of the Coastal Act. If those grounds are asserted and the Commission
finds that the appeal raises a substantial issue, the
Commission will hold a de novo hearing on the appeal. In the de novo hearing, the Commission has jurisdiction to address whether or not the action taken in the local coastal permit is consistent with the LCP and the public access policies of the Coastal Act. Thus the Commission’s review at the de novo hearing is not limited to the appealable development.
2. Projects bisected by Commission and local government jurisdiction. The circumstance may arise wherein proposed development is located within both the Coastal
Commission's and local government's coastal development permit jurisdictions. In such cases, coastal permits are required by both the Commission and the local government.
In the case of any division of land, the permit is issued by the Commission only for lots or parcels created which
require any new lot lines or portions of new lot lines within the area subject to the Commission's retained jurisdiction. In Projects that
straddle
appeal
boundaries
Projects that
straddle
jurisdictions
PG CC 12/21/22
176 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
13 such an instance the Commission's review is confined to those lots or portions of lots within its jurisdiction. In the case of any development involving a structure or similar
integrated physical construction, the Commission issues a permit for any structure partially in the retained jurisdiction area. For example, a permit for a shoreline protective device (e.g. a seawall) that is located partially within the
Commission’s retained jurisdiction would be reviewed by the Commission.
3. Projects bisected by different local government jurisdictions.
If a project straddles the boundaries of two local
governments, the applicant must obtain separate coastal permits from each jurisdiction. An exception is possible for public agencies that, pursuant to Coastal Act Section 30605, may obtain one "Public Works Plan" approval from the
Coastal Commission, in lieu of locally-issued coastal
permits.
C. Resolving Determination Disputes
Occasionally, disputes will arise as to the precise type of development being proposed (i.e. categorically excluded, appealable, non-appealable). If this happens, local staff should contact the Commission District staff and request an Executive Director’s Determination. The Executive Director then would make a separate determination, within two working days of the request (or upon completion of a site inspection where such inspection is warranted), and transmit the determination to the local government.
If the two determinations differ, then the Commission makes the final decision, after a public hearing (Commission Regulations Section 13569).
PG CC 12/21/22
177 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
178 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
15 CHAPTER III. LOCAL COASTAL PERMIT REVIEW
AND ACTION
Two types of notice are required by local government as part of the post-certification coastal permit process: (A) public notice of hearing or pending action to interested parties prior to a local decision; and (B) notice of final action to the Commission and those who have requested such notice after a local decision.
Appendix B summarizes the notice requirements in table form.
Promptness in filing notices is important. For example, if a notice of final action on a project is received in the Commission office late or if it does not include the necessary information, a delay to the applicant can result, since the start of the Commission's appeal period would also be delayed. This chapter reviews the minimum requirements for each type of notice, as specified in the Commission's Regulations. Noticing of proposed amendments to locally issued coastal permits would follow the same procedures used for noticing the original permits, including noticing of final action.
In many cases, the existing local public notice procedures and forms can be adapted to meet coastal permit noticing
requirements, rather than developing new ones. For example, a local government's notice for a Planning Commission hearing on a use permit often is shown on the meeting agenda. It would not normally warrant a separately mailed notice. By adding to the agenda a notation that the project is in the coastal zone, the minimum requirements for non-appealable hearing items are satisfied provided the agenda is mailed to owners and residents and all others identified for receiving notice. Other types of notice format can be adapted to provide the necessary information in a similar manner. The sample forms in Appendix 2B and 2C are geared toward coastal permit processing, independent of existing local procedures.
A. Notice of Hearing or Pending Action
If a coastal permit is needed for a proposed development, local government is required to provide public notice of local review prior to reaching a decision. The Commission's Regulations (Sections 13563-13568) specify the minimum requirements for such notice -- when provided, who receives notice, and notice contents. Typically, local ordinances already require some form of notice prior to local PG CC 12/21/22
179 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
16 action. The LCP implementing ordinances should specify how the two sets of requirements are combined for coastal permit applications.
The Commission's minimum requirements differ for various permit applications. Local staff should first determine the type of permit application: (i) appealable developments, hearing required; (ii) nonappealable development where local ordinance requires a hearing (e.g. use permit); or (iii) non-appealable development where local ordinance does not require a hearing (e.g. building permit). This determination should be part of the permit application, since the applicant may be responsible for providing certain notice materials (e.g. list of nearby owners and residents). The notice requirements are reviewed below for the different application types.
1.Notice of Hearing/Appealable Development (Regulations Section 13565): For development applications that are appealable to the Commission, a public hearing is required, and notice of such hearing must be provided at least 7 calendar days beforehand.
Notice is to be provided by first class mail to: the applicant; any interested persons; owners and residents within 100 feet of the project parcel boundary; and the Coastal Commission district office.
The notice must include: a statement that the proposed
development is in the coastal zone; the filing date and applicant's name; the number assigned to the application; a description of the proposed development and location; the hearing date, time and place; a summary of local hearing and review procedures; and procedures for local and Commission appeals. If the hearing is continued, the subsequent hearing must be noticed in the same manner (unless information about the new hearing is announced at the original hearing). See Appendix C-2 for a sample notice form.
2. Notice of Hearing/Non-appealable Development (Regulations Section 13568[a]): Notice for hearings on non-appealable developments is similar to those for appealable projects. Notice of the hearing must be provided at least 10 calendar days
beforehand. Those to receive notice by first class mail include owners within 300 feet of the project-parcel boundary as well as those described in 1 above. The only mandatory item in the notice is a statement that the proposed development is in the coastal zone. If the application is heard by a Planning Commission, the local government should also publish a notice in a general Determining
Type of Notice
Appealable
Projects
Projects Not
Appealable
PG CC 12/21/22
180 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
17 circulation newspaper or, if there is none, post notice in at least three public places (e.g. public library). See Appendix C-2 for a sample notice form.
3.Notice of Pending Action/Non-appealable Development (Section 13568[b]): For non-appealable development applications where no local hearing is required (e.g. building permit), the minimum notice requirements are similar to those in A.1, above. Since a local official takes action instead of a discretionary review body, this notice must describe the procedure for submitting comments and indicate that sufficient time is allowed for receiving comments prior to the decision. See Appendix C-3 for a sample notice form.
B. Notice of Final Local Action
A "Final Local Action" means a decision where all required findings have been adopted and where there is no further possibility of being appealed to a local appellate body (Commission Regulations Section 13570). The decision may have been taken by a
discretionary body such as the Planning Commission, following a hearing, or through administrative review, such as by the Zoning Administrator. Clearly, any decision taken by a City Council or Board of Supervisors is automatically a final action, since there is no possibility of appeal to a higher local appellate body. After a final local action, local government is obliged to provide notice of its decision to certain specified parties. Notice is also required if a development application is approved because the time limits for local action have expired. Section 13571 of the Commission's Regulations gives the minimum requirements for notices of final local action.
1. Notice of Final Action: Notice must be provided within 7 calendar days of the final local action. Notice is sent by first class mail to the Coastal Commission district office and to those persons who have requested to be informed of final local action on the proposed development. (Notices may not be sent by fax or email) To be complete, the notice must include: the action taken, conditions of approval (if any), written findings supporting the decision, and (if the local action is appealable) a description of the procedure for appeal to the Commission. The Commission also requests local governments to ensure that the notice contains the applicant’s name and address so that the Commission can mail notice to the applicant that the final action has been received. See Appendix C-4 for a sample form.
Ministerial
Projects
Notice
Required
PG CC 12/21/22
181 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
18 Required findings must meet the standards for issuance of a coastal development permit set forth in Coastal Act Section 30604(b). Specifically, Section 30604(b) provides that, after certification of a local coastal program, a coastal development permit shall be issued if the issuing agency (or the Commission on appeal) finds that the proposed development is in conformity with the certified local coastal program. Section 30604(c) sets forth additional standards for the issuance of permits for proposed development between the nearest public road and the sea or the shoreline of any body of water (e.g. a lake) within the coastal zone.
Permits for such development "shall include a specific, finding that such development is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3" of the Coastal Act (commencing with Section 30200).
For local actions that are appealable to the Commission, the notice of final local action has special significance. Pursuant to Regulations Section 13110, the ten working day appeal period starts with the first day after receipt of a complete final local action notice. (Thus, if a final action notice is received on a Friday the following Monday would be the first day of the appeal period.) Once the Commission's appeal period begins, the Commission must notify the local government and permit applicant of the appeal period dates. It is therefore important that the notice of final action include the applicant's name and address.
Even for projects that are denied or are not appealable, it is important for the Commission to receive timely final action notices.
The Commission keeps records of locally issued coastal permits for a variety of purposes including for: the conduct of Periodic Reviews, budgeting, federal reporting requirements, responding to requests for information and other purposes. The Commission also needs to know which permits have recorded legal document requirements (See discussion in Chapter V.)
An incomplete or late notice, or lack of receipt of a final local action notice, will delay the start of this appeal period. Because the local and Commission appeal periods run consecutively, one after the other, the effect of a delayed appeal period is to lengthen the applicant's wait between local action and permit issuance. See Chapter IV of this Guide for a more detailed discussion of appeals.
2. Notice of Failure to Act: If a local government fails to act on a coastal development permit within the time limits set forth in the Government Code sections 65950-65957.1, until and unless the public notice required by the Permit Streamlining Act has first been Standard
for findings
Appealable
Decisions
Deficient
Notice
PG CC 12/21/22
182 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
19 provided, a development project is not automatically approved.
When a local government determines that the prescribed time limits have expired and the required public notice has been provided, then the local government is considered to have approved the coastal permit. At this point, however, the local government must still comply with the appropriate post-certification public notice for the development approval in the same manner as with a Final Local Action Notice, whether the development is appealable or not appealable. (See Section III (B)). The 7 calendar day period for the required Final Local Action Notice begins the day the local government determines that the development has been approved pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act. (Regulations Section 13571 [b][2]). When the Commission receives a Final Local Action Notice for a development approved by local government under the Permit Streamlining Act, the procedures for appeal to the Commission are the same as for other appealable development. (See Chapter IV).
PG CC 12/21/22
183 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
184 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
21 CHAPTER IV. APPEALS OF LOCAL DECISIONS
After LCP certification, certain local actions on development applications are appealable to the Coastal Commission. Chapter II of this Guide discusses the types of development and local actions that are appealable. This chapter reviews the Commission appeals process and how it relates to local governments' existing appeals procedures. Commission consideration of appeals after LCP certification provides an additional level of review by a body with a broader perspective and the ability to give guidance on interpretation of policies for issues of statewide importance. At the same time, the Commission's Regulations require (with some exceptions) that local appeals be exhausted prior to any appeals before the Commission. This approach increases the likelihood that development controversies can be resolved at the local
government level.
A. Appeal Limitations
Sections 30603(b) (1) and (2) of the Coastal Act limit the grounds for appealing projects acted on pursuant to a certified LCP. The grounds for appeal of the approval of most appealable projects are limited to an allegation that the development does not conform to the standards set forth in the certified LCP or the public access policies of the Coastal Act. However, the grounds for an appeal of a denial of a permit for a major public works project or a major energy facility are limited to an allegation that the development conforms to the standards set forth in the certified LCP and the public access policies of the Coastal Act.
In addition, Coastal Act Section 30625 restricts who can appeal a local decision on a coastal permit: only the applicant, an "aggrieved person", or two members of the Commission are eligible to appeal.
An "aggrieved person" is one who, in person or through a representative, expresses concerns about an application or local action by appearing at the local public hearing, or otherwise communicating his or her concerns to the local government by other appropriate means prior to a hearing, or who for good cause could do neither (Regulations Section 13006 and Coastal Act Section 30801). An “Aggrieved person” includes the applicant for a permit. Also, to qualify as an aggrieved person with appeal rights, an appellant must have exhausted all local appeals unless one of the exceptions noted below exist. (Commission Regulations Section 13573[a])
Grounds for
appeal
Eligible
Appeallants
PG CC 12/21/22
185 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
22 There are several exceptions to the requirement that local appeals must be exhausted in order to appeal a project to the Commission.
In the following instances, appeals can be made directly to the Coastal Commission:
1. The local government requires an appellant to appeal to more local appellate bodies than have been certified, as appellate bodies for permits in the coastal zone in the LCP implementing ordinances,
2. An appellant was denied the right of the initial local -appeal by a local ordinance that restricts the class of persons who may appeal a local decision.
3. An appellant was denied the right of local appeal because local notice and hearing procedures did not comply with the notice and hearing provisions of the Commission's
Regulations.
4. The local government charges an appeal fee for the filing or processing of appeals.
5. Two Commissioners, pursuant to Commission Regulations Section 13573(b), appeal the final local action. (However, the local government can provide, in its LCP ordinances, for a Commission appeal to be suspended pending review by
the proper local appellate body. This option is discussed under C below.)
The Commission's experience has shown that a great many local governments charge an appeal fee for filing and processing a local appeal thus allowing appeals directly to the Commission.
B. Appeal Procedures
The appeals process begins with an initial local decision on a coastal development application. The decision-maker may be a Zoning Administrator, Planning Commission, etc., depending on the type of development proposed and the local review process.
This decision starts a local appeal period, as specified by ordinance. If the decision is appealed, then the process is repeated until either (i) there is no further local appeal of the decision (e.g., a decision by the Planning Commission on an appeal is not followed by an appeal to the City Council), or (ii) there are no more local bodies to appeal to (e.g. the City Council renders a decision on the Exhausting
local appeals
Exceptions
Local
appeals
PG CC 12/21/22
186 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
23 application). Whatever is the last action taken is the final local action.
Local officials then send a notice of the final action to the Commission and interested persons, as discussed in Chapter III of this Guide. If the local action is appealable to the Commission, then it is subject to a 10-working-day appeal period (Commission Regulations Sections 13110 and 13111). Please note that if Commission staff does not receive a notice of final action or finds the notice of final action incomplete, the appeal period will not begin until the required information is received. Depending on whether the final action notice is complete or incomplete, Commission staff will notify the local government and applicant in writing of either the appeal period dates or any deficiencies in the notice.
The 10-working-day Commission appeal period begins on the first working day following the day on which the Commission office received the complete final local action notice; an appeal, to be accepted for Commission review, must be submitted in writing by 5 P.M. of the tenth working day from notice receipt. The appeal should be made by completing a copy of the Commission's appeal application form, available from any of the Commission's offices.
The appeal should be submitted to the Commission office in the district that includes the affected local government.
When an appeal to the Commission is submitted, Commission staff will determine if the appeal is valid (e.g., determine if the appellant has standing to appeal, and determine if grounds cited for appeal are valid). Commission staff may contact local staff to determine if the person filing the appeal participated in the local hearing. Also, the Executive Director, within 5 working days of receipt of an appeal from any person other than members of the Commission or any public agency, determines whether the appeal is patently frivolous. If such a determination is made, the appeal is not filed until a $300 fee is deposited with the Commission within 5 working days of the receipt of this determination. [PRC 30620 (d).
If the appeal is valid, Commission staff will immediately notify the local government and applicant in writing that issuance of the coastal permit is suspended, pending resolution of the appeal (Regulations Section 13112). Also, local staff will be requested to forward the complete administrative record, including
environmental documents and other supporting materials, to the Commission within five working days from the local government's receipt of the notice of appeal. Section 13112 of the Commission's Commission
Appeal Period
Filing an
Appeal
Frivolous
Appeals
Transmittal of
local permit
file
PG CC 12/21/22
187 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
24 Regulations provides that if the Commission fails to receive the documents and materials, the Commission shall set the matter for hearing and the hearing shall be left open until all relevant materials are received.
To minimize the cost to the local government of preparing this administrative record, local staff may want to ask applicants for extra copies of application documents (e.g. consultant reports or EIRs) for controversial projects.
Commission review of the appeal is a two-step process. First, the Commission determines, according to Coastal Act Section 30625(b)(2) provisions, whether the local action raises a substantial issue with respect only to the specific allowable grounds, on which the appeal was filed. [PRC Section 30603(b)]. If the Commission finds no substantial issue, the appeal is dismissed and the final action of the local government stands. The Commission will send written notice of such “No Substantial Issue” decisions to the local government. After a No Substantial Issue decision the local government can issue the local coastal permit.
If the Commission does find substantial issue, then the final action of the local government on the coastal development permit is no longer in effect. The Commission then will act upon the appeal as a new project - approving, denying, or conditionally approving the coastal permit application. This second step is referred to as a de novo review, and the Commission's action supersedes the local government's final action for the coastal development permit only (the Commission action has no affect on other locally-issued discretionary permits.) Both the substantial issue and de novo action steps require a public hearing, and the Commission may take both steps at the same meeting.
Coastal Act Section 30604(b) provides that, "After certification of the local coastal program a coastal development permit shall be issued if the issuing agency or the Commission on appeal finds that the proposed development is in conformity with the certified local coastal program." Therefore, if the Commission finds substantial issue and conducts a de novo hearing on the appealed permit application, the applicable test for the Commission to consider is the certified Local Coastal Program. At the de novo hearing the Commission can consider all issues regarding compliance with the certified LCP and relevant Chapter 3 policies and not only those raised in the appeal.
Substantial
Issue Review
Commission
de novo
review
PG CC 12/21/22
188 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised May 6, 2002
25 In addition, for projects located between the first public, road and the sea or the shoreline of any body of water within the coastal zone, Section 30604(c) requires that a specific finding must be made by the approving agency (whether the local government or the Coastal Commission on appeal) that the development is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act. In other words, in regard to public access and recreation questions, the Commission is required to consider, in a de novo hearing of an appealed project, not only the certified LCP but certain Chapter 3 policies as well.
C. Appeals by Two Commissioners
As noted above, a local government may require, by LCP
ordinance provisions, that an appeal by two Commissioners, before local appeals have been exhausted, be suspended pending review by the appropriate local appellate body (Commission Regulations Section 13573[b]). This feature provides greater opportunity to resolve development issues at the local government level.
Otherwise, appeals by two Commissioners of ministerial actions (e.g. by the zoning administrator) would have to be brought directly to the Coastal Commission, bypassing appointed and elected local officials.
Where the action is modified or reversed by the local appellate body, then the Commissioners are required to file a new appeal. In the case where review by the local appellate body has left the originally appealed action unchanged, the Commissioners' appeal is no longer suspended and the appeal is then brought before the Commission.
PG CC 12/21/22
189 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
190 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
27 CHAPTER V. COMPLIANCE WITH PUBLIC ACCESS
AND OPEN SPACE CONDITIONS
A certified LCP usually specifies procedures for an applicant to comply with permit conditions, or the procedures are left to the administering agency. However, the Commission's regulations (Section 13574) govern the implementation of certain public access and open space conditions even after certification.
Conditions that mitigate impacts of development to coastal access and resources may require an applicant to either grant or offer an easement or record a deed restriction on the property for stated purposes to mitigate specific impacts. Such conditions may also (or instead) restrict the applicant's use of a portion of his or her property. To comply with such conditions, the applicant must complete and record certain legal documents.
Prior to LCP certification, Commission staff is responsible for reviewing completed legal documents and assuring that the legal documents are properly recorded. Following certification, Commission staff retains the reviewing function unless a local government requests the authority to process the recordation of the necessary legal documents (Commission Regulations Section 13574[b])
The Commission can delegate to a local government the authority to process the recordation of the necessary legal documents if the local government requests such authority and demonstrates the capability to process access offers (Section 13574[b] of the Commission's Regulations). The authority would include the ability of the local government or an identified public agency or private association to accept, open, operate, and maintain accessways and open space/conservation areas required as a permit condition.
If a local government receives the recordation processing authority, then it must forward a copy of the recorded access or open space documents to the Executive Director following recordation for input into the Commission’s Access Inventory and Other Recorded Documents Inventory.
In addition, the county recorders are required to maintain an index of all recorded easements provided appropriate documents are submitted at the time of recordation. (pursuant to Government Code 27255).
PG CC 12/21/22
191 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
192 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
29 CHAPTER VI. LCP AMENDMENTS
Periodically there may be reasons for a certified LCP to be amended. This chapter explains different types of amendments, minimum requirements for local review of amendments, and how the Commission processes LCP amendments. The review process for local governments and the Commission is similar to that for original LCP submittals. As with original LCP submittals, an LCP amendment does not take effect until the Commission effectively certifies it.
A. Amendment Types
An LCP amendment is needed whenever any portion of the
certified LCP is revised (e.g. coastal element of the general plan, LUP policies, access component, zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, specific plan, permit procedures or other ordinances certified as part of the LCP). Substantial revisions usually will involve both the LUP and the implementation program (e.g. both revised land use and zoning designation for a parcel or parcels).
Below are some typical revisions to a jurisdiction's plans and regulations, and the consequent LCP amendments:
Revision Examples LCP Amendment
Rezone parcel(s) Revise zoning map (and
maybe LUP map). May also
affect site-specific standards
in the LCP
Revise habitat protection
standards (e.g. riparian
setbacks)
Revise zoning district
regulations and (if necessary)
LUP policies and standards.
Revise list of uses in
zoning district(s)
Revise LUP land use
category and zoning
district(s). May also affect
District-specific standards.
Newly-annexed territory New land use and zoning
designations, other specific
policies, standards, and
regulations as necessary.
Please note that if a city annexes an area in the coastal zone that was previously under a certified LCP of another jurisdiction, upon PG CC 12/21/22
193 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
30 annexation the LCP for that area is no longer in effect and the permit authority reverts to the Coastal Commission until the City amends it LCP to cover the newly annexed area.
B. Minimum Requirements
The Coastal Act and the Commission's Regulations provide certain requirements for LCP amendments. These minimum requirements address the frequency of amendments, public participation during local review, contents of the amendment submittal, procedures for Commission review, and effective date.
Local governments may make no more than three submittals of proposed major LCP amendments per year, although there is no limit to the number of amendments included in each submittal (Coastal Act Section 30514[b]). The limit on the number of yearly submittals pertains to the LCP taken as a whole, regardless of any pre-certification LCP segmentation.
Since a proposed amendment is not deemed actually submitted until it is found to be in proper order and legally adequate to comply with Coastal Act Section 30510(b), a submittal will be counted toward a year's quota of three submittals only during the year in which it is found to be legally adequate (which is not necessarily the same year as when the proposed amendment is received in the Commission's offices).
Proposed LCP amendments that are determined to be "minor" or de minimis by the Executive Director (PRC Section 30514[c] and [d]) are not restricted to three submittals per year. Major, minor and de minimis LCP amendments are explained in C below.
Jurisdictions must provide the same level of public participation during LCP amendment preparation and review as that for the original LCP (Commission Regulations Section 13552[a]). These participation standards are found in Regulations Section 13515.
Notices of public hearings or availability of draft LCP amendments must be mailed to: (i) members of the public requesting such notices; (ii) contiguous and affected local governments- (iii) various regional, state and federal agencies; and (iv) local libraries and media. Copies of LCP amendment drafts and related documents are to be mailed to requesting persons; Section 13515(b) allows local governments to charge fees sufficient to cover the cost of duplicating and mailing these materials. Notices of public hearings must be given general publication and sent to interested persons and public agencies (above) at least 10 working days before the Frequency
and Types
Public
Participation
Standards
PG CC 12/21/22
194 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
31 hearing (Section 13515[d]). The local government cannot take any final action on the LCP amendment until six weeks after providing notice of availability of the draft LCP amendment (Section 13515[c]).
The LCP amendment must be submitted to the Coastal
Commission pursuant to a resolution by the City Council or Board of Supervisors (Commission Regulations Section 13551). The resolution should state that the LCP amendment will be carried out in accordance with the Coastal Act (pursuant to Section 30510[a] of the Act). It should also specify whether the proposed LCP amendment will take effect automatically upon Commission approval or will require local adoption afterward. The first option is probably more suitable for amendments that do not involve rezonings (e.g., some amendments to LUP policy language); the latter option may be appropriate if extensive follow-up action is necessary (e.g., an ordinance that requires a first and second reading and a 30-day effective date period).
An LCP amendment submittal to the Commission must include various supporting materials. These are listed in Section 13552 of the Commission's Regulations and include: (i) a summary of public participation measures; (ii) a list of interested persons contacted for comment; (iii) significant comments received and the local government's response; (iv) a full description of the LCP amendment (policies, standards, text with strike-outs and underlines, maps, and so forth); (v) a discussion of the amendment's relationship to and effect on the rest of the LCP including the access component; (vi) an analysis of how the amendment complies with the "common methodology" for LCP preparation (Commission Regulations Section 13511); (vii) any environmental documents required pursuant to CEQA (see Public Resources code Section 21080.9); and (viii) an indication of the zoning measures that will be used to carry out an LUP amendment.
Appendix D provides a general checklist of these requirements.
C. Commission Review
Following submittal of the LCP amendment, the Commission reviews it in basically the same way as it would an original LCP submittal. First, the Commission staff decides if the submittal is complete for filing (i.e., whether it meets the requirements of Commission Regulations Sections 13551 and 13552 summarized above). If so, staff files the amendment submittal, starting the Commission's review period. If not, staff notifies the local government in writing of the submittal's inadequacies.
Submittal
Resolution
Required
Supporting
Materials
Filing
Procedures
PG CC 12/21/22
195 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
32 Second, the Commission staff decides if the LCP amendment is "major”, "minor" or “de minimis”. This distinction is intended to speed up review of urgent or non-controversial LCP changes; if the amendment is deemed minor or de minimis the review process is much simpler. In a single submittal containing several LCP amendments, there may be a mix of major and minor items.
De Minimis amendments are those amendments that will have no individual or cumulative impact on coastal resources, will not propose changes in land or water use or change in allowable use of the property, and that comply with certain public noticing criteria as specified in PRC Section 30514 (d).
The term "minor" LCP amendment is not defined exhaustively, but the Commission's Regulations Section 13554 provides several examples such as:
1. Amendments to address newly-annexed or detached
territory where the city's LCP proposal and county's LCP proposal for the territory are equivalent.
2. Wording changes in the implementation program which
provide more specific guidance without changing the type, location or intensity of use.
In general, any other proposed change in the type of use would be reviewed as a major amendment.
Third, the Commission reviews and acts upon the proposed LCP amendment. De Minimis and minor amendments are approved administratively. The Executive Director notifies interested persons of the proposed amendment and reports the determination and any objections to the Commission at its next meeting. Commission approval is automatic unless one-third of the appointed members object, in which case minor amendments are reviewed as a major amendment (Commission Regulations Section 13555[a]) and de minimis amendments are reviewed as either minor or major amendments or at the request of local government returned to the local government. (PRC 30514 (d)(3)(B)).
Pursuant to Regulations Section 13555(b), major amendments are reviewed in essentially the same fashion as original LCP submittals, which are governed by Coastal Act Sections 30512 and 30513 (and Commission Regulations Sections 13522-13542). The main difference is that the Commission does not make a
Determining
Type of
Amendment
Amendment
Review
Procedures
PG CC 12/21/22
196 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
33 determination of whether the LCP amendment raises a substantial issue under the Coastal Act, as it does for the LUP portion of an LCP submittal (Coastal Act Section 30514[b]). The Commission must vote on the amendment within 90 days of filing in most cases; if the LCP amendment involves only the implementation program, the Commission has only 60 days (Regulations Sections 13522, 13530, and 13542[b]). For each LCP amendment, the Commission will vote either to deny or certify the proposed amendment; the Commission has the option of suggesting modifications following a denial action (unless the local government requests that it not do so). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Commission has the authority under Coastal Act Section 30517 to extend the voting time limits for a period of time not exceeding one additional year.
Fourth, after Commission approval of an amendment the local government takes any necessary actions to implement the amendment. This might include ordinance adoption (if not already adopted), rezoning actions, or acceptance of suggested
modifications. Also, as with original LCPs, an LCP amendment does not become effective until completion of the following three steps: (i) all necessary local government follow-up actions, including the acceptance of suggested modifications, are taken; (ii) the Executive Director determines that the follow-up actions are legally adequate; and (iii) the Commission concurs with the Executive Director's determination (Commission Regulations Sections 13551, 13544, and 13544.5). However, if -- in its resolution accompanying the proposed amendment submittal -- the local government had specified that the amendment would take effect automatically upon Commission approval, and if the Commission's approval did not include any follow-up terms or suggested modifications, then steps (i) through (iii) would not be necessary for the certified amendment to become effective.
D. Other Provisions
The primary initiative for LCP amendments will come from local governments administering LCPs, based on their experience, ongoing planning, and development patterns. However, the Coastal Act provides for the Commission or other agencies to suggest LCP amendments to the responsible local government under certain circumstances. The Commission must periodically review each certified LCP at least once every five years after certification to evaluate its effectiveness in implementing Coastal Act policies (Section 30519.5). If the Commission finds deficiencies, it is to recommend corrective actions (which may include LCP
Local
Implementation
Amendments
suggested by
the
Commission
PG CC 12/21/22
197 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
34 amendments) to the local government. The Coastal Act also provides for the Commission to recommend LCP amendments to local governments in order to accommodate "uses of greater than local importance" which were not anticipated in the certified LCP (Section 30519[c]).
The Commission itself is authorized to amend a Local Coastal Program in only very limited, specific instances. The Coastal Act provides that under certain circumstances persons authorized to undertake a public works project or proposing an energy facility development may request LCP amendments. (Coastal Act Section 30515). To qualify for consideration, the project must be intended to serve public needs beyond the LCP area and must not have been anticipated when the LCP was being certified initially. If the local government agrees with the proposed project, it would process the LCP amendment as discussed above. If the local government does not amend its LCP, the requesting party can petition the Commission to consider the amendment, explaining why the amendment is needed and how it conforms with Coastal Act policies. The Commission, after a public hearing and after the local government explains its action, may certify the LCP amendment if it can make several specific findings regarding balancing of effects and public welfare and need, alternatives and consistency with the Coastal Act.
Amendments
for
Energy/Public
Works
PG CC 12/21/22
198 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
35 CHAPTER VIII. LOCAL REVIEW OF OTHER COASTAL
MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES.
In addition to the Commission continuing regulatory responsibilities described elsewhere in this document, the Commission retains authority over other types of activities in the coastal zone, such as the federal consistency review authority, review of Coastal Conservancy projects, review of Public Works Plans and Long Range Development Plans. While regulation in these areas is not delegated to local government, nonetheless local governments have the ability to provide input into these decision-making processes.
A. Federal Consistency Authority: Review of Activities
Approved, Funded or Carried Out By Federal Agencies
The federal Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) obligates the federal government to assure that it carries out its activities that affect coastal zone resources in a manner consistent with federally approved state coastal management programs. Three types of federal activities trigger this federal consistency review:1) direct federal agency activities; 2) federal permits and licenses; and 3) federal support to state and local governments. To assure federalstate coordination, the CZMA requires that the federal agency or applicant proposing the activity prepare a statement of consistency with the state coastal management program. The federally designated state agency then reviews the statement and concurs with or objects to it.
In California, the Coastal Commission is the agency designated to undertake federal consistency reviews on activities that affect coastal uses or resources. The federal consistency review authority gives the state a voice it would not otherwise have in many federal activities. This authority is separate from the Commission's permit authority and it cannot not delegate this authority to local government after certification of its local coastal program. However, the Commission gives consideration to the views of affected local governments in the consistency decision process.
Relationship to LCP
Under provisions of the federal Coastal Zone Management Act, the Commission cannot delegate the federal consistency review authority to local governments. The Coastal Act, and not an LCP, is PG CC 12/21/22
199 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
36 the legal standard for the Commission's decisions. However, if the Commission has incorporated an LCP into the CCMP, it provides guidance for the Commission's review of federal consistency submittals. The LCPs interpret and refine Coastal Act policies as they apply to specific geographic areas, and thus provide valuable guidance to the Commission in its evaluation of federal activities.
Local governments may participate in the decision-making process by taking part in the Commission's public hearings on consistency matters and by presenting a statement regarding the consistency of the proposed activity with the certified LCP. By active participation in the consistency process, the local government can assure that LCP policies are fully considered in the Commission's review and in possible modification of proposed federal actions.
Further Information
Additional information on federal consistency, including copies of the federal Coastal Zone Management Act (16 U.S.C. Sections 1456-1464), the implementing regulations (15 C.F.R. Part 930), and a guide to federal consistency are available upon request from the Commission's San Francisco office or on the Commission’s webpage at http://www.coastal.ca.gov/fedcd/fedcndx.html.
B. Coastal Conservancy Projects
The Coastal Conservancy has the authority to fund restoration projects and resource enhancement projects in the coastal zone, pursuant to approved coastal restoration or resource enhancement plans, respectively. Such plans are submitted to the Coastal Commission for determination of consistency with the Coastal Act, or under certain circumstances, to local governments with certified LCPs for determination of consistency with certified LCP. (See Public Resources Code Sections 31251-31270.
C. Public Works Plans and Projects.
As noted previously, there are options for public agencies undertaking public works to prepare public works plans as an alternative to rpoject by project review of coastal development permits. The approval of public works plans is not delegated to local government but if the local government has a certified LCP the Commisison must consult with the the jurisidction before it approves the public works pan.
PG CC 12/21/22
200 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
37 List of Appendices
A. Letter on CDP Jurisdiction and Interpretation of Maps B. Table of Notice Requirements
C. Sample Forms
1. Samples of Coastal Permit Applications
2. Sample Notice of Public Hearing on Coastal Permit
3. Sample Notice of Pending Action on Coastal Permit
4. Sample Notice of Final Action
D. LCP Amendment Checklist
E. Focus on Enforcement Program
PG CC 12/21/22
201 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
202 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
B-1
Appendix B:Table of Noticing Requirements for Locally Issued Coastal Permits Mandatory Notice Requirements (Regulations Sections 13563-13568,13571):
Notice Type Example of Proposed
Development
When Notice Provided How Notice Provided Who Receives Notice Notice Contents 1 Prior to Decision:
Notice of Hearing
(appealable)
Project seaward of first
public road
At least 7 calendar days
before hearing
First Class Mail 2
? Applicant(s)
? Interested persons 3
? Nearby owners and
residents (100’) 4
? Commission
? In coastal zone
? Filing date and applicant
? Application Number
? Description of project,
location
? Hearing date, time and
place
? Local Hearing procedures
? Local and Commission
appeals
Notice of Hearing (Not
Appealable)
Use permit or variance in
non-appealable area
At least 10 calendar
days before hearing
First Class Mail 2 and
newspaper posting 5
? Interested persons 3
? Nearby owners (300’)
and residents (100’) 4
? Commission
? Statement that proposed
development is in coastal
zone
Notice of Pending Action
(No Hearing, Not
Appealable
Building permit in nonappealable areaAt least 7 calendar days before decision
First Class Mail2
? Interested persons 3
? Nearby owners and
residents (100’) 4
? Commission
? In coastal zone
? Filing date and applicant
? Application Number
? Description of project,
location
? Pending action date
? Local review procedures
? Statement on public
comment
After decision:
Notice of Final Action -------- Within 7 calendar days
of decision 6
First Class Mail ? Requesting Persons 7
? Commission
? Approval conditions (if any)
? Written findings
? Procedure for appeal to
Commission
Notice of Failure to Act ------- Within 7 calendar days of determination 8
First Class Mail ? Requesting Persons 7
? Commission
? Procedure for appeal to
Commission
Table Notes:
PG CC 12/21/22
203 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
B-2
1. Notice Contents: List of contents if paraphrased: see Commission’s Regulations for complete explanation of each item Sections 13565 – 13568, and 13571).
2. First Class Mail: The Commission has indicated a willingness to allow hand delivery of notice to residents within 100 feet of the project boundary in rural jurisdictions where it is often difficult to identify these residents. If the applicant delivers these notices, local governments would need an affidavit or other proof of delivery.
3. Interested Persons: All persons who have requested to be on the mailing list for that development project or for coastal decisions within the local jurisdiction.
4. Nearby owners and residents: Measure as distance from perimeter of parcel on which development is proposed.
5. Notice by posting or newspaper: Required in addition to notice by first class mail. If the Planning Commission conducts the hearing on a non-appealable development, notice must be published in a newspaper of general circulation; otherwise, notice must be posted in at least three public places in the jurisdiction.
6. Notice of Final Action: Notice is provided within 5 working days of action for interim permit authority decisions.
7. Requesting Persons: All persons who have requested notice of final local action on the proposed development. A local government can charge a fee for this service or require these persons to supply stamped, self-addressed envelopes.
8. Failure to Act: The 7-day notice period begins on the date that the local government determines (after required public notice) that the time limits established pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act have expired.
PG CC 12/21/22
204 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
C-1
APPENDIX C-1:
SAMPLES OF COASTAL PERMIT APPLICATIONS
PG CC 12/21/22
205 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
C-2
APPENDIX C-2:
SAMPLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON COASTAL PERMIT
PG CC 12/21/22
206 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
C-3
APPENDIX C-3:
SAMPLE NOTICE OF PENDING ACTION ON COASTAL PERMIT
PG CC 12/21/22
207 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
C-4
APPENDIX C-4:
SAMPLE NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
PG CC 12/21/22
208 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
D-1
APPENDIX D:
LCP AMENDMENT SUBMITTAL CHECK LIST
The California Code of Regulations (14 Cal. Admin. Code; Sections 13551 & 13552) and the Coastal Act (Public Resources Code) identify the required contents of an LCP Amendment submittal. The following checklist outlines general information but the requirements of the statute and regulations take precedence:
(1) A resolution adopted and dated by the Board of Supervisors or City Council after a public hearing (P.R.C. Section 30510(a)):
– Indicating that the local government intends to carry out the LCP in a manner fully consistent with the California Coastal Act.
– Indicating when it will take effect (automatically upon Commission approval or requiring formal local action after Commission approval). (2) A clear, reproducible copy of adopted amendment(s). For example, – If additional text, an indication of where it fits into the previously certified document (e.g. insert as p. 20a between pp. 20 and 21 as policy number __). – If revision to certified text, submit either with strikeouts and underlines or with indication of what policies, paragraph(s) or page(s) it replaces. – If map changes, submit a new (replacement) map or submit a supplemental map with indication that previously adopted map is to be superseded by the supplement for the specific geographic area indicated (13552(b), (c)). (3) Discussion of the amendment’s relationship to and effect on other sections of the previously certified LCP, including the access component. (Amendments that affect areas between the first public road and the sea should pay particular attention to discussing the amendment’s effect on the access component.) If the amendment to a certified LCP involves a land use plan (LUP) change only, an indication of which certified zoning provision(s) carries it out. If the amendment involves a zoning change only, an indication of which certified land use plan provision(s) it carries out (13552(c) and (f)).
(4) If the amendment is to the land use plan only (there is no certified Implementation Plan), an indication of the zoning measures that will be submitted to carry out the amendment.
PG CC 12/21/22
209 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
D-2
(5) An analysis that meets the requirements of Section 13511 of the California Code of Regulations (Common Methodology) or an approved alternative pursuant to Section 13514(Alternative Methodology) and that demonstrates conformity with Chapter 6 of the Coastal Act (Implementation). For example: if the amendment involves a change in density or public service provision, an analysis of potentially significant adverse cumulative impacts on coastal resources and access, due to the change, and how the change can be found consistent with the policies of Chapter 3 and 6 of the California Coastal Act. The information provided in satisfaction of this requirement must be sufficient to allow the Commission to reasonably judge the amendment’s consistency with Coastal Act resource protection policies.
(6) Any environmental review documents, pursuant to CEQA, required for all or any portion of the amendment to the LCP.
(7) All policies, plans, standards, objectives, diagrams, drawings, maps, photgraphs and supplementary data, related to the amendment in sufficient detail to allow review for conformity with the requirements of the Coastal Act. For example this might include such things as biological studies, traffic studies, geotechnical reports, slope analyses and other documents.
(7) A summary of the measures taken to ensure public and agency participation.
Include:
– A list of hearing dates, sample notice, and mailing list. – Evidence of noticing the amendment, at a minimum, to the following: any member of the public who has so requested; each local government contiguous to the jurisdiction that is proposing the amendment; local governments, special districts, or port and harbor districts that could be directly affected by, or whose development plans should be considered in, the amendment; regional, state and federal agencies that may have an interested in or be affected by the amendment; local libraries and media.
– Names and addresses of all hearing participants (written and verbal) and commenters.
– Copies or summaries of significant comments received at the local hearing and any response to comments by the local government.
(8) All local staff reports and other information addressing the LUP amendment request’s consistency with the Coastal Act, and/or the adequacy of the implementation program, as amended, to conform with and to carry out the certified LUP. (P.R.C.
Sections 30512 and 30513)
PG CC 12/21/22
210 of 332
California Coastal Commission
LCP Post-Certification Guide for Coastal Cities and Counties Revised April 24, 2002
E-1
Appendix E: Focus on Enforcement Program
Excerpt (revised) from Coastal Currents Issue #6
Volume 2, Issue #6
December 2001
In 1981, the Commission’s legal division established a statewide coastal development permit (CDP) enforcement program to address unpermitted development and development undertaken inconsistent with the terms and conditions of previously issued coastal permits. A full-time program coordinator was assigned to the program in 1985, along with several part-time district officers and a part-time staff counsel. However, due to lack of funding and available staff, the program languished through the 1980’s, and it wasn’t until 1991 that former Governor Wilson added more positions to the budget.
The legislature has strengthened the enforcement provisions of the Coastal Act during the past decade by giving the Commission the power to issue cease and desist and restoration orders, and has increased the act’s penalty provisions significantly, reflecting the rise in land values and creating a disincentive to would-be violators of permit requirements. Cease and desist orders are used by the Commission to halt ongoing violations and to force developers to comply with the permit process; restoration orders are used to bring about the removal of unpermitted development and/or restoration of damaged coastal resources. Cease and desist and restoration orders are perhaps the most important enforcement tools available to the Commission. These orders are quasi-adjudicative matters before the Commission, and have been quite effective in deterring and stopping illegal development activities in the coastal zone.
Between 1996 and 1999, the Commission’s open violation caseload increased by 96%, creating a critical need for additional staff. Last year’s expansion brought the number of permanent enforcement staff up from five to 14. The new enforcement staff includes six district enforcement officers, who strive to resolve violations without formal administrative action, and four headquarters enforcement officers, who prepare cease and desist orders and restoration orders. The officers are tackling the existing backlog of open cases as well as responding to new violations. In addition, the officers work with local governments, attending local task force meetings and coordinating strategies on cases that span permit jurisdictions.
The mission of the Commission’s enforcement program is to protect coastal resources by assuring that development is properly permitted, and that all terms and conditions of coastal development permits are satisfied. To achieve this mission, the enforcement program seeks to respond quickly and effectively to significant violations of the Coastal Act’s permit requirements; to obtain timely restoration of coastal resources that have been damaged by violations; to reduce the incidence of significant Coastal Act violations through effective deterrence; and to establish a systematic inspection program. Expansion of the program has enabled the Commission to work toward these enforcement goals in a comprehensive fashion.
PG CC 12/21/22
211 of 332
The City of Point Arena
Request for Proposal for Consultant Services to Assist
With Local Coastal Plan Amendment
Responses due by 4pm PST February 28, 2022
City of Point Arena
PO Box 67
Point Arena, CA 95468
707-882-2122
http://pointarena.ca.gov
PG CC 12/21/22
212 of 332
INTRODUCTION
The City of Point Arena, California, seeks the services of a professional consultant to prepare a Local Coastal Plan (LCP) amendment application to update portions of its General Plan last updated in 2006. The scope of this project will include a sea level rise study and necessary environmental analysis as required by the Coastal Commission to support the LCP amendment.
Work toward an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance and changes to development regulations in the Highway Commercial district has already begun and will be incorporated into this LCP amendment project.
BACKGROUND
The City of Point Arena is a small coastal community in Mendocino County of approximately 450 residents within a 1.2-square mile area. It is home to Point Arena Cove and Pier and the Point Arena-Stornetta Lands of the California Coastal National Monument.
The City of Point Arena, a general law city incorporated in 1908, is located entirely in the Coastal Zone and is subject to the regulations of the Coastal Act of 1976.
Point Arena has a council/manager form of government, with five Councilmembers who are elected as the City's legislative and policymaking body. Under their direction, the City Manager is responsible for the daily administration of the city.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The City of Point Arena seeks an individual or firm with an understanding of regulations in the Coastal Zone and experience developing LCP Amendments for approval by the California Coastal Commission. The City of Point Arena seeks the following scope of services.
1. Assist City staff and City Council in defining the scope of proposed Local Coastal Plan amendment(s).
2. Facilitate community outreach and engagement of the public in the update process.
3. Coordinate with Coastal Commission staff and staff from other agencies, as needed.
4. Draft proposed LCP Amendment application(s).
PG CC 12/21/22
213 of 332
5. Coordinate the processing of LCP amendment application(s), including preparation of necessary documentation and attendance at hearings.
ANTICIPATED WORK PRODUCTS
1. Gather and report on community input from listening sessions.
2. Prepare analyses and studies necessary to support LCP amendment and/or assist with the procurement of consultant services for such work. Nature of analyses and studies will depend on the contents of the amendment, as determined by the scope of work. Analyses and studies may address sea level rise, traffic, utility capacity, biological resources, visitor-serving supply and demand, etc.
3. Draft LCP Amendment proposal for City Council review and approval;
4. Submit LCP Amendment application to the California Coastal Commission.
REQUESTED INFORMATION
All proposals must provide specific and succinct answers to all questions and requests for information listed below. Indirect, imprecise or incomplete responses will not be accepted. Submission of resumes is encouraged, but alone may not be considered responsive to any specific questions contained herein.
Cover Letter: Provide a brief cover letter summarizing the key points of the proposal, including an understanding of the work to be performed and why the individual/firm believes it is the best qualified to perform the services requested. The letter must be signed by an individual with authority to bind the proposer and should state that all conditions contained in the attached proposal are valid for a period of at least 90 days.
Company and Staff Information: Provide information about the individual/firm, including such items as organization and ownership structure, history, experience and credentials to demonstrate the ability to provide the requested services. Provide the location of the principal office that will be responsible for the implementation of this contract. Provide the names, titles, experience, qualifications (including certifications) and resumes of the personnel who will be assigned to the City, including any subconsultants.
Work Plan: Identify the process in which the project will be completed, including:
methods for gathering public input, conducting workshops related to community visioning; gathering information from City staff; producing plans and recommendations; timeframe in which to complete the project, etc. Please include a proposed timeline in this section.
PG CC 12/21/22
214 of 332
Additional Information: Please include any additional information you or your firm feels would be essential to the proper evaluation of your response to this Request for Proposals.
References: Provide a minimum of three (3) references who may be contacted to discuss their experience working with the consultant/firm on similar services. Please provide contact information including the organization, name, title, address, phone, email, services provided and dates.
Cost Proposal: Based on the described scope of services, please include in your proposal the total cost of services in detail (including all incidentals). Include a schedule of hourly rates for each employee of the consultant/firm working on the City’s program. Final cost will be negotiated upon selection of consultant/firm. Please include any costs not included in the fixed hourly cost, and the rates for each.
Insurance: Prior to commencement of work, the City of Point Arena will require evidence of appropriate professional liability insurance, errors and omissions insurance, and workers' compensation insurance coverage.
NOTE: Such coverage must be provided by an insurance company(ies) licensed to do business in the state of California. Certificates must name the City of Point Arena as an Additional Insured and shall provide that contractor's policy is primary over any insurance carried by the City of Point Arena and that the policy will not be canceled or materially changed without thirty (30) days prior notice in writing to the City of Point Arena. The successful firm must agree, if awarded a contract as a result of its proposal, to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Point Arena, its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to persons engaged in the work contemplated by its proposal, or to persons who may be injured or damaged by a firm or its agents in the performance of the work. Prior to the commencement of any work, a signed legal contract will be established for these and other provisions.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Qualifications will be evaluated against, but not be limited to, the following criteria:
• Understanding of the scope of work.
• Experience with preparing Local Coastal Program amendments and related documents.
• Experience interacting with Coastal Commission staff. • Professional qualifications of the staff to be assigned.
PG CC 12/21/22
215 of 332
• Cost of services.
• Timeline to complete project.
• References and other evidence submitted supportive of excellent past experience in providing similar services.
• Completeness of responses to the Request for Proposals.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Deadline for receipt of Proposals
All Proposals must be received by the City of Point Arena by 4:00 PM PST on February 28, 2022. An original and one electronic copy (on USB flash drive) of the proposal shall be submitted in a sealed envelope to:
City of Point Arena
Attn: City Manager
PO Box 67
Point Arena, CA 95468
Proposals must be in writing and must contain an original signature by an authorized officer of the proposing consulting company. All proposals must be received no later than 4:00 PM PST on February 28, 2022 via U.S. mail, UPS/FedEx/etc., or in person.
The City reserves the right to accept multiple proposals for the components listed in this RFP or a single proposal for all of the components listed in this RFP. Proposals will not be valid until all information has been verified and proposing consulting company’s references checked. The completed proposal shall be without interlineations, alterations or erasures. Alternative proposals will not be considered unless requested.
The proposal may be withdrawn upon request by the proposing consulting company without prejudice up to, but not after, the time fixed for opening of proposals, provided that the request to withdraw the proposal is made in writing and is timely filed with the City. Proposalsshall be submitted in accordance with the form prescribed by the City of Point Arena in the Requested Information section. Failure to respond in this manner may render the proposal non-responsive.
Questions Regarding the Scope of Services
All inquiries regarding this Request for Proposals should be directed to Paul Andersen, City Manager, in writing or via email at: [email protected]. No verbal responses will be given. A copy of the inquiry and the response from the City shall be forwarded PG CC 12/21/22
216 of 332
to all firms receiving a copy of this Request for Proposals who have indicated an interest in submitting a proposal by February 28, 2022.
Proposals Become the Property of the City
Proposals become the property of City and information contained therein shall become public property subject to disclosure laws after Notice of Intent to Award. The City reserves the right to make use of any information or ideas contained in the proposal.
Confidential Material
All bids are public records and can be held confidentially. Proposer must notify the City in advance of any proprietary or confidential material contained in the proposal and provide justification for not making such material public. The City shall have sole discretion to disclose or not disclose such material subject to any protective order which proposer may obtain.
Rejection of Proposals
The City may reject any or all proposals and may waive any immaterial deviation in a proposal. The City's waiver of an immaterial defect shall in no way modify the Request for Proposal (RFP) documents or excuse the proposer from full compliance with the specifications if he/she is awarded the contract. Proposals referring to terms and conditions other than the City’s terms and conditions may be rejected as being nonresponsive.
The City may conduct investigations as it deems necessary to determine the ability of the proposer to perform the work specified herein. The proposer shall furnish to the City any and all information requested by the City for this purpose. The City reserves the right to reject any proposal if the evidence submitted by, or investigation of, such proposer fails to satisfy the City that such proposer is properly qualified to carry out the obligations of the contract and to complete the work specified.
Conditions
1. Failure to meet all requirements will not disqualify a firm. However, the City will evaluate each proposal to determine its overall fit in the best interests of the City.
2. All third-party solutions proposed as part of a joint proposal are subject to the same requirements of this RFP, unless otherwise stated.
3. This RFP, its general provisions, and the terms and conditions identified shall be incorporated in any agreement resulting from this solicitation, and the RFP and its PG CC 12/21/22
217 of 332
terms and conditions, shall control unless the Agreement expressly provides otherwise.
4. All proposals and any subsequent clarification or response to the City’s questions shall be valid for a minimum of 120 days.
City’s Rights Reserved
1. The City reserves the right to select the proposal which in its sole judgment best meets the needs of the City. The lowest proposed cost will not be the sole criterion for recommending the contract award.
2. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals and to waive technicalities and informalities when such waiver is determined by the City to be in the City’s best interest.
3. The City may modify this RFP by issuance of one or more written addenda.
Addenda will be posted on http://pointarena.ca.gov. City reserves the right to extend the proposal due date.
4. The City reserves the right to meet with select proposers at any time to gather additional information.
The City shall not be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by prospective consulting companies, including but not limited to costs incurred in the preparation or submission of proposals. The City shall be held harmless and free from any and all liability, claims, or expenses whatsoever incurred by, or on behalf of, any person or organization responding to this RFP.
Public Records
All proposals submitted in response to this RFP become the property of the City, and may be subject to public review.
Exceptions
Service providers shall certify that they take no exception to this RFP, if the service provider does take exception to any portion of the RFP, the specific portion of the RFP to which exception is taken shall be identified and fully explained. Sample Agreement text may be considered for modification through the contract negotiations phase of the RFP; however, in no event will modifications be considered to any provisions not identified by proposer as part of their response to this RFP.
Special Consideration
PG CC 12/21/22
218 of 332
This RFP does not commit City to award a contract, to defray any cost incurred in the preparation of a proposal pursuant to this RFP, or procure or contract for work.
Right to Cancel
This solicitation does not obligate the City to enter into an agreement with any proposing firm. The City retains the right to cancel in part or in its entirety, this RFP at any time. No obligation, either expressed or implied, exists on the part of the City to make an award or to pay any cost incurred in the preparation or submission of a proposal. If City cancels or revises this RFP, City will notify all proposers in writing and post cancellation notice on the City website.
Additional Information
City reserves the right to request additional information and/or clarifications from any or all proposers to this RFP.
###
PG CC 12/21/22
219 of 332
Agenda No. 12 B
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Laurel O'Halloran, Planner & Economic Development Coordinator MEETING DATE: December 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Parklet Program
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
1. Receive recommendations from Traffic Safety and Planning Commissions.
2. Receive Proposed Draft Parklet Program Manual and provide feedback.
Provide direction to City staff to move forward with a program based on Title 15, Encroachment Permits, and Director of Public Works approval.
3. DISCUSSION
Background
The current Parklet Program sunsets on May 31st, 2023.
In June and August of 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City Council ratified local emergency actions to facilitate outdoor dining on public and private property and curbside pick-up/delivery. Following these actions, on April 21, 2021, the City Council enacted Ordinance 21-009 as an emergency ordinance to implement a “Parklet Program” to allow businesses to utilize parking spaces, sidewalks and other outdoor spaces for dining and other purposes in a safe environment to improve business during the health emergency. This action encouraged and promoted sidewalk dining to help improve the local business economy, create a more urban pedestrian environment, and promote and protect public welfare in a healthy and safe manner.
On May 5, 2021, the City Council enacted Ordinance 21-013 as a non-emergency ordinance which clarified the scope and effect of the Sidewalk Dining, Outdoor Dining and Parklet Program previously put into place. Ordinance 21-013 suspended provisions of PGMC section 15.16.045 (Sidewalk seating and sidewalk dining) and in its place imposed requirements consistent with the prior “Parklet Program” that applied to sidewalk and outdoor dining.
On June 1, 2022, the City Council adopted Ordinance 22-006 which extended the provisions of Ordinance 21-013 and allowed the Parklet Program to continue for one more year with no changes. This extension was a further response to the pandemic emergency and allowed time for staff to create and present a comprehensive successor program for City Council review.
City Council Direction
PG CC 12/21/22
220 of 332
City Council Direction
At the May 11, 2022, City Council meeting, City Council directed staff to do the following: 1) hold a community outreach meeting, 2) go to the Traffic Safety Commission and the Planning Commission for feedback, and 3) return to the Council before the end of 2022 with a draft Parklet Program.
Per City Council direction, staff held a public outreach meeting in the Council chambers July 21, 2022.
Prior to this public meeting, staff conducted a site walk with the City's Traffic Engineer to review current parking and traffic conditions. In this site walk, the City Traffic Engineer reviewed Parklet impacts on traffic flow, parking configurations, and pedestrian safety. After walking the site, the City's Traffic Engineer created two options for a new striping and parking plan for the downtown Lighthouse Avenue area to improve circulation with Parklets in use. Staff then met with the City's Traffic Commission on July 26, 2022. The Traffic Commission made a recommendation to remove parking in the center median on Lighthouse Avenue between Fountain Avenue and Grand Avenue.
At the August 11, 2022, Planning Commission meeting, City staff provided the Planning Commission with an update regarding status of the draft Parklet Program including the Traffic Safety Commission recommendation, and explained that staff would provide a draft Parklet Program Manual for the Planning Commission to review. The Planning Commission Chair called a special meeting of the Planning Commission for the purpose of a parklet discussion and forming a subcommittee.
At the September 1, 2022, Planning Commission Special meeting City staff provided an agenda report with a draft Parklet Program Manual and a recommendation that the Planning Commission create a Parklet Subcommittee to review the draft manual and provide feedback. The Planning Commission voted to create a Subcommittee to review Parklets in Pacific Grove and to provide direction on design and the current program.
At the September 8, 2022, Planning Commission meeting, the Parklet Subcommittee provided an update on their efforts to the Planning Commission. At the December 8, 2022 Planning Commission Regular and Special Meeting the Planning Commission Subcommittee submitted a report (attached) with recommendations.
Recommended Parklet Program Elements
The following are the critical elements identified by staff to continue a successful Parklet Program:
1. Update Title 15 of the City’s Municipal Code (Streets and Sidewalks) to expand the Encroachment Permit process to allow Parklets in the Public Right-of-Way. Title 15 currently only recognizes utilities within the Public Right-of-Way.
2. Review and approve the proposed Parklet Manual by Resolution. The proposed Parklet Manual creates design standards for new Parklets, and allows existing Parklets to be allowed to stay provided they follow the guidelines and requirements of the policy manual. It also creates a maintenance plan that must be adhered to by the licensee.
3. Require an annual temporary Encroachment Permit. The Encroachment Permit will be reviewed by staff with a final decision made by the Director of Public Works or designee. All reviews will be completed in accordance with the proposed Parklet Manual and associated design standards. Issuing an Encroachment Permit for a Parklet allows the Parklets to remain temporary and revocable if the Parklet Manual conditions are not met. The Parklet operator does not have tenure in their Parklet, and the license does not run with the land.
PG CC 12/21/22
221 of 332
Should the City Council concur with City staff's recommendations, the proposed ordinance and Parklet Program Manual with a corresponding resolution may be brought back at a City Council meeting prior to May 2023 for consideration and adoption.
Commission and Public Parklet Concerns and response from staff:
1. Traffic, access, and visibility. Staff worked with the City Traffic Engineer to walk the sites and work on potential solutions. If the City Council moves forward with a new Parklet Program, staff will work to adjust some of the current striping and parking layouts.
2. Maintenance of existing parklets. Staff has included a section within the proposed Parklet Manual which requires a maintenance plan as part of the encroachment permit renewal process. Staff can direct the operator to relocate the propane storage during the review process.
3. ADA, Coastal Commission, Water permits. Within the proposed Parklet Manual, all Parklets existing or new are required to comply with all Federal, State, and local requirements. Staff will verify compliance at the time of permit renewal.
4. Fire Department access and operational permit. Staff will review access to the Parklets as well as the restaurant during the review process. An operational permit is not suggested or supported by the Fire Department.
5. The Parklet operators that have both Sidewalk Dining and Parklets must choose one or the other. A compelling rationale for this recommendation has not been provided, and is not recommended by staff.
6. Allow existing Parklets to remain provided they apply and obtain all specified permits. The Planning Commission Subcommittee recommendations would require most existing Parklets to be removed with only a few able to comply using the Planning Commission Subcommittee’s proposed new Parklet standards.
7. Health and Safety concerns. City staff have conducted inspections during construction as well as ongoing reviews, and have not found any health and/or safety issues. Specifics have not been provided by the Planning Commission Subcommittee or the public in this area.
OPTIONS
1. Provide alternate direction from staff's recommendations.
2. Take no action. Taking no action will cause the existing Parklet Program to sunset in June 2023.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Fees
Should the City Council choose to move forward with the parklet program, staff will return to Council at a later date to provide options to be added to the City Fee Schedule during its annual review period.
Fiscal Impacts
There is no fiscal impact in providing City staff with recommendations from this report.
GOAL ALIGNMENT: Facilitate Local Business Recovery: Review and revise existing policies and programs and develop a strategic plan to better serve existing businesses.
PG CC 12/21/22
222 of 332
Attachments
Draft Parklet Program Manual
PC Subcommittee report
PG CC 12/21/22
223 of 332
1 DRAFT
PARKLET PROGRAM MANUAL
PURPOSE
The City of Pacific Grove Parklet Program attempts to facilitate a partnership between the City of Pacific Grove and the public to safely delineate and repurpose certain spaces within public streets that have historically been utilized for functions such as on street parking. Through the placement of parklets within the public right-of-way and the implementation of associated safety measures, parklets could reprogram public space through the inclusion of amenities such as seating and dining. Collectively, parklets broaden the potential for the public right-of-way and create vitality and activity in the City’s commercial districts.
This manual is an overview of the goals, policies, processes, procedures, and guidelines associated with the creation of parklets within the public right-of-way. Applicants and designers in the City of Pacific Grove are strongly encouraged to read this manual in its entirety when they are first thinking about proposing a parklet and utilize it as a reference as the project moves through the design, permitting and construction phases.
Understanding what the program is attempting to achieve and the process and regulations for a successful parklet may reduce the time it takes to receive a permit and will likely result in a superior design.
The Parklet Program Manual focuses on activating space within the public right-of-way that generally falls within the curb zone as depicted in “Figure 1 – Frontage Zones”. Proposals to activate exterior spaces within the “frontage zone” described on this exhibit or on private property fall under separate approval and permitting processes and any applicant attempting to activate these areas should first contact the Community Development Department.
DEFINITIONS
A. “Private Parklet in the Public right-of-way” means a temporary, non-structural platform constructed within the traveled portion of right-of-way that replaces one or more parallel, perpendicular, or diagonal parking space(s) and all associated furnishings. A platform may be built to bring the grade of the sidewalk out into the street. Once the platform is installed, furnishings such as tables, chairs, benches, bike parking, and/or landscaping may be placed on the platform. Parklets must be placed in the Curb Zone as described in Figure 1 - Frontage Zones. City staff can make alternative dimensional requirements based on site conditions. The owner of a private parklet may limit the use of the parklet to members of the public who patronize the sponsoring business.
PG CC 12/21/22
224 of 332
2 B. “Existing Parklet” means a parklet that obtained the required encroachment permit during the temporary parklet program period.
C. “New Parklet” means a parklet that has not ever received any type of encroachment permit or city approval to operate.
D. “Shared Space” means underutilized areas of public streets or areas of the public right-of-way not specific to parking uses or defined as pedestrian or vehicular travel ways.
E. “Through Zone” means the unobstructed area of sidewalk where primary pedestrian circulation occurs. The Through Zone shall always remain free and clear of physical obstructions.
F. “Frontage Zone” means the sidewalk area between the Through Zone and the front ofthe adjacent property/building which may accommodate pedestrian oriented activities or sidewalk dining.
G. “Furnishing Zone” means the area between the Through Zone and the Curb Zonewhere streetscape amenities such as planter boxes, streetlights and tree wells are typically located.
H. “Curb Zone” means the area located between the Furnishing Zone and the vehicular or bicycle travel lane and defines the boundary between the pedestrian realm and the roadway. The Curb Zone only exists in areas that contain parallel, perpendicular, or diagonal public parking along the curb line.
I. “Sidewalk dining” means Tables, chairs, benches, umbrellas, waiter stands, barriers, tray stands, planters, trash receptacles, and other furniture normally associated with dining (collectively hereafter, for convenience, “furniture”) may be placed on the sidewalk but shall not be placed to obstruct the minimum unobstructed pedestrian travel width of the sidewalk defined as a minimum of five feet. All applicable Americans with Disabilities (ADA) requirement minimums shall be met.
Sidewalk dining furniture placed on the sidewalk shall be of a consistent design and employ similar materials and colors as approved by the city to complement all other approved sidewalk furniture and fixtures, such as streetlights and bicycle racks, throughout the city.
PG CC 12/21/22
225 of 332
3 Figure 1 - Frontage Zones
GENERALOVERVIEW
APPLICATION AND PERMITTING FOR EXISTING PARKLETS AND SIDEWALK DINING Permit Renewal
Parklet Encroachment Permits will be issued for a 12-month period. The applicant will be eligible to apply for a renewed encroachment permit prior to the permit expiration. An approved renewal will result in the issuance of a new Encroachment Permit. The following is required prior to approving the renewal:
• Encroachment Permit – Renewal Processing Fee
• Encroachment Permit application completed
• Certificate of Insurance with City of Pacific Grove as additional insured • Submit a parklet /outdoor dining maintenance plan
• A seating and site plan may be required
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW PARKLETS or SIDEWALK DINING Requests for new parklets must be submitted under an Encroachment Permit Application. The review of the application will occur through two separate review phases:
• The initial review will determine if the site selected is suitable for the installation of a parklet and provide clarity prior to the development of full construction drawings. Once the site is approved, the applicant may commence with completing the full design. • Once the design and construction drawings are finalized, the applicant will submit the final design package to the city. The design drawings will be reviewed against the requirements in this manual, as PG CC 12/21/22
226 of 332
4 well as all codes, policies and standards associated with accessibility and work within the public rightof-way. Once all documents submitted are reviewed and approved, the encroachment permit will be issued.
It is the applicant’s responsibility to acquire an appropriately licensed contractor to complete the installation.
The contractor will be responsible for implementing any necessary traffic or pedestrian controls needed to keep the area safe during construction. City inspectors will review all work performed under the permit.
Parklet applications will be reviewed against the current codes, polices and standards in effect at the time of parklet application submittal. This manual mentions specific requirements that are addressed in Federal, State and Local municipal codes in effect at the time of publication. Although the manual will be revised in the future to address new code adoptions, there may be times in which the manual does not accurately describe all applicable code requirements.
PUBLIC OR PRIVATE
The use of parklets installed under this manual may either be always made available to the public or restricted to patrons of the sponsoring business. Public and private parklets are defined in the “Definition” section of the manual and the various sections of this document will point out where the requirements deviate based on the intended use.
PERMIT DURATION
Parklet Encroachment Permits will be issued for a 12-month period. The applicant will be eligible to renew the application for an additional 12 months prior to the expiration of any approvals. The City will reserve the right to deny the extension of the permit if existing conditions have changed in the general area and the parklet is unable to meet the published location requirements at the time the renewal request is received.
Requests may also be denied if the location is needed to support a city infrastructure project that is scheduled to commence during the requested extension period or if the applicant is found to be non-compliant with any element of their current permit.
PERMIT FEES
Processing, plan review, public noticing and inspection fees will be applied to all new parklet applications. A renewal fee will also be applied to the annual renewal of any approved Parklet Encroachment Permit. Fees shall be established by City Council and can be found in the city fee schedule.
ADDITIONAL PARKLET/SIDEWALK DINING REQUIREMENTS ALL APPLICATIONS The following additional requirements may apply to any new or existing Parklet (see Definitions).
Monterey Regional Water Management District
The installation of a Private Parklet MAY result in an increase in the restaurant seat count or useable square footage associated with the business operation. Please contact MRWMD at (831) 658-5600 for the current requirements.
PG CC 12/21/22
227 of 332
5 CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
If a parklet is located in coastal zone, a Coastal Development Permit may be required. This review will be part of the encroachment review process.
TRAFFIC SAFETY
Parklets are installed within close proximately to adjacent vehicular traffic. The requirements within this document identify the specific minimum measures that the applicant must take to protect the structure from adjacent vehicular movements. The applicant is ultimately responsible for ensuring the safety of individuals occupying the parklet.
INSURANCE
The permittee operating the parklet and the contractor performing the physical improvements in the public right-of-way will be required to secure a policy of broad form commercial general liability insurance by an insurer acceptable to the City. The policy shall, by endorsement, name the City of Pacific Grove, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers as additional insured and shall protect them from claims for personal injury, death, or property damage suffered by third persons and arising out of the work performed pursuant to the permit or the manner of installation or construction. Workers’ Compensation insurance shall also be maintained to meet minimum state requirements.
CALIFORNIA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL (ABC)
Applicants shall comply with all applicable ABC regulations regarding alcohol use for their establishment within the parklet. The issuance of an Encroachment Permit does not constitute any ABC or Zoning approvals for alcohol use by the City. Applicants are solely responsible for securing a valid ABC license to allow/extend business operations within the encroachment area.
PARKLET PROPOSED IN SHARED SPACE
Most parklets will be installed within existing public parking spaces located along a public street. In certain situations, the street and sidewalk are configured in a fashion that creates additional areas in the public rightof-way that are not used for sidewalks, parking, or vehicular travel lanes. Installations within Shared Space will need to incorporate unique features to conform to the available area and the manual may not accurately describe all the specific requirements. An applicant wishing to install a parklet within a Shared Space must consult with the City’s Community Development Department prior to submitting formal applications.
GENERAL OPERATIONS
It is the responsibility of the permittee to ensure that the parklet always remains in compliance with this manual, the conditions of the permit and the requirements set forth in Chapter 15 of the Pacific Grove Municipal Code. Regular maintenance activities should be performed per the required maintenance plan. The area should be kept clean and inviting for members of the public. The parklet must also experience continuous use and must always be associated with an operating business. Specific conditions will be added to the permit that allow for an immediate revocation of the permit if the parklet does not experience continues use for more than 20 calendar days or if the sponsoring business is no longer operating. Staff may extend this deadline.
PG CC 12/21/22
228 of 332
6 USE OF SOUND AMPLIFICATION
The use of sound amplification in the outdoor dining area or parklet is allowed but shall be limited to the hours of dining service, and in no event shall be allowed before 10:00 a.m. or after 10:00 p.m. Without a permit pursuant to PGMC 11.94.010 it shall be impermissible to operate or cause to operate or suffer or permit the operation of sound-amplifying device under any circumstances whereby sounds therefrom become audible and disturbing to a person or persons beyond the boundaries of the dining area or parklet on which the amplification occurs.
APPLICATION APPROVAL NEW PARKLETS
The City of Pacific Grove Community Development Department (CDD) is responsible for ensuring that parklets are well designed, safe and a positive addition to the public right-of-way. CDD’s Building division will be your primary point of contact throughout the design, permitting and construction phases. City Staff will assist with the resolution of any design issues, if necessary, and will ensure that parklets reflect the goals and intent of the program. The following section will provide guidance associate with the preliminary plan development and permit submittal.
STEP 1 – LOCATION CRITERIA
The first step associated with the development of a parklet is to select the appropriate location. Eligible locations will be determined based on the criteria below:
Parking Spaces
Parklets can be sited along the curb line on streets where on-street parking spaces exist. They may be in any location where there are or would be space(s) for on street parallel, diagonal or perpendicular parking.
Parklets can be considered in metered or unmetered spaces and shall maintain the following setbacks from adjacent parking spaces and vehicular travel lanes:
Figure 2 - Parallel parking spacing
PG CC 12/21/22
229 of 332
7 Utilities
Parklets shall not obstruct any underground and surface utility or stormwater facilities, including but not limited to utility poles, gas valves, water valves, manhole covers, air release valves, sewer laterals, culverts, and catch basins. Access to all surface utilities shall be always maintained. Attempts should be made to maintain a 5’ separation from all surface utilities, covers, and structures. If separation cannot be maintained due to the general location of the underground utilities in the area, the parklet must incorporate removable panels or modular components to allow for access to all existing utility covers.
Please be aware that excavation around underground utilities may be needed to maintain infrastructure, address emergency situations, or to support routine replacement programs. The permittee must accept the responsibility of relocating any portions of the parklet that may impede operations, maintenance, or construction activities within the public right-of-way. Under an emergency, the applicant may be provided with little or no notice to remove any items prior to the commencement of emergency construction processes. The city will not accept responsibility for the damage or replacement of any items that City staff are required to remove from the public right-of-way to accomplish necessary maintenance, repair, or reconstruction activities. The city will not be responsible for any impacts to the permittee’s ability to provide service during these activities.
Fire Protection
Clear access must be always provided to fire hydrants and fire department connections (FDC). Parklets and/or sidewalk dining must be placed at least 3’ from any existing fire hydrant or fire department connection (FDC). Parklets may not impede any aerial access to adjacent structures. A reduced separation from hydrants and FDCs may be approved by the Fire Marshal in areas where the orientation of the existing fire hydrant or the surrounding features reduces the access impacts that an adjacent parklet would normally create.
Transit
Parklets are not permitted in bus zones but may be located adjacent to a bus zone. The City’s Transit Division will determine the appropriate distance from a transit stop on a case-by-case basis.
Long Term City Capital Improvement Projects
As part of the initial review process, the city will determine any conflicts with future programed City sponsored capital improvement projects. The City may reject or delay the initial permit approval, or the extension of any existing permits, if a parklet conflicts with any scheduled City streetscape improvement or utility projects.
MAINTENANCE PLAN
Permit holders are required to keep the parklet well maintained and in good repair. Permittee’s must develop a maintenance plan for keeping the parklet free of debris and garbage. Parklet owners are also required to sweep the area surrounding the parklet and remove litter.
A maintenance plan must be provided describing maintenance activities intended to keep the seating area clean and inviting for the community. The plan should address maintenance, cleaning procedures, landscaping maintenance (if applicable), and pest control.
PG CC 12/21/22
230 of 332
8 STEP 2 – OBTAIN ANY NEEDED PERMISSION
Parklets must be placed adjacent to the business establishment that has the same operator and must be restricted to the width of the commercial space that contains the business establishment. Due to the condition of the existing street parking, it may not always be possible to keep the parklet footprint within the width of the commercial space. Parklets may extend across the frontage of the adjacent business in this case if written permission is obtained from the adjacent property owner or business operator.
Signed written permission must be submitted with the parklet application to deem the application complete. A current signed written approval from the current property owner or business operator must be obtained and provided with each extension request associated with existing parklet permits.
STEP 3 – PREPARE APPLICATION PACKAGE
Once an eligible location is determined and any needed permission from the adjacent owner(s) or tenant(s) is obtained, the next step is to develop the initial submittal package. The initial submittal package will be reviewed by various City Departments to determine if the specific location can be approved. The initial submittal process is intended to determine an approvable footprint for the parklet prior to the operator fully investing in the development of design and construction drawings. This step will provide a higher level of certainty in the overall process. The initial application package shall include the following documents:
Site Plan
Understanding the existing street and sidewalk environments around the proposed parklet location is a critical piece to the overall review of the application. A site plan must be submitted with all new parklet applications showing the footprint of the parklet, all proposed features within the parklet and all existing public and private improvements around the proposed location. The site plan, drawn to scale, shall include the following information:
1. Proposed parklet footprint, including all dimensions.
2. Approximate width of business frontage
3. Name and address of the directly adjacent businesses
4. Existing sidewalk widths
5. Existing parking spaces and dimensions
6. Existing planters, street trees or tree wells
7. Other existing sidewalk features near the proposed parklet area (fire hydrants, streetlights, utility access covers, bike racks, etc.)
8. Any colored curbs (red, yellow, green, white, blue)
9. Adjacent bike or vehicular travel lanes
10. Any existing underground utilities that are clearly in the parking stalls or adjacent travel lanes Photographs of Existing Conditions
The initial submittal package must include photographs taken from specific angles, views and locations identifying the existing sidewalk and street conditions. In addition, the submittal shall include a photograph of each existing in-ground utility cover (both in the street pavement as well as those in the sidewalk area) that PG CC 12/21/22
231 of 332
9 may be impacted by the proposed parklet. Photos of utility covers shall be taken from directly above the cover looking straight down at the cover.
Project Narrative
The Project Narrative is a short project description explaining the vision and purpose for the parklet. Project Narratives shall describe the following:
1. Statements regarding the intended use. Will the use of the proposed parklet be restricted to patrons of the associated business or will it be open to the public (Public or Private Parklet)?
2. General design concepts
3. How the proposed location will benefit from the parklet
4. The inclusion of an art, amenities such as bicycle parking or coverings such as umbrellas.
5. If known, information about who will design the parklet Illustrative Design Concepts
In addition to the project narrative, you may also submit sketches or drawings that focus on the proposed design of the parklet. These supplemental materials help clarify your parklet vision to the city.
Approval from Adjacent Tenants or Property Owners (If needed) Approval forms, executed by the adjacent property owner and tenant (if the unit is occupied) must be provided with the initial submittal if the any portions of the parklet extend beyond the frontage of the associated business
STEP 4 – SUBMIT YOUR APPLICATION PACKAGE
Applicants may submit their initial application package through the CDD On-line encroachment application portal. The initial package must be submitted as an Encroachment Permit.
STEP 5 – PROPOSAL REVIEW
Once the application package is received, City will conduct an internal review of the documents submitted.
The proposal will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
1. Proposal meets all location standards specified in Step 1
2. Proposal does not conflict with near future planned City roadway, utility, orstreetscape projects
3. Parklet is not proposed in an area where it may create a significant impact to the operation and maintenance of existing underground utilities
4. Parklet is not placed in an area where unique roadway configurations or traffic patterns may create additional safety risks to occupants of the parklet
STEP 6 – FINAL DECISION
Once the application has been reviewed and it meets the set criteria, an encroachment permit will be issued. If the PG CC 12/21/22
232 of 332
10 project does not meet the criteria either a correction notice will be issued or a denial letter. If the applicant wants to appeal this decision, they must follow the process set forth in Title 15.
Permit Suspension or Revocation
The applicant must always operate the parklet in a safe and sanitary fashion. The City reserves the right to suspend or revoke the permit at any time consistent with Title 15 of the City Code.
Sample Final Site Plan
PG CC 12/21/22
233 of 332
11 PG CC 12/21/22
234 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
235 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
236 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
237 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
238 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
239 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
240 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
241 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
242 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
243 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
244 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
245 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
246 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
247 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
248 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
249 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
250 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
251 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
252 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
253 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
254 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
255 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
256 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
257 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
258 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
259 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
260 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
261 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
262 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
263 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
264 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
265 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
266 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
267 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
268 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
269 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
270 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
271 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
272 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
273 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
274 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
275 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
276 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
277 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
278 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
279 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
280 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
281 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
282 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
283 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
284 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
285 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
286 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
287 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
288 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
289 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
290 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
291 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
292 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
293 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
294 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
295 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
296 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
297 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
298 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
299 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
300 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
301 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
302 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
303 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
304 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
305 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
306 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
307 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
308 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
309 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
310 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
311 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
312 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
313 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
314 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
315 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
316 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
317 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
318 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
319 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
320 of 332
Agenda No. 13 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jocelyn Francis, Police Administrative Services Manager MEETING DATE: December 21, 2022
SUBJECT: 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe Police Vehicle Purchase
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the City Manager to award a purchase order with Premier Chevrolet of Seaside for the purchase of (1) 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe Police Vehicle in an amount not-to-exceed $76,500.
DISCUSSION
The Pacific Grove Police Department currently has a marked patrol fleet of eight (a combination of Ford Explorers, Dodge Chargers, Ford Crown Victorias, and a Ford Expedition). The unmarked police fleet are hybrid Toyotas. It was the Department's intent to continue to purchase hybrid vehicles, as approved in the capital outlay program. However, the single police rated hybrid vehicle (a Ford Interceptor Explorer) is not available for purchase due to a chip issue associated with the transmission. No date has been issued by Ford on when this problem will be resolved.
The City has spent tens of thousands of dollars in this fiscal year to repair the aging fleet and is in need of a new vehicle purchase in the near term. The vehicles costing the most in maintenance and repair are the Fords. After review of CHP and Michigan State Police testing data on police rated vehicles, staff (police and mechanical) are recommending to purchase a Chevrolet Tahoe.
The City received (3) quotes from dealerships for the purchase of one Chevrolet Tahoe and (3) quotes for outfitting of the vehicle (this includes lights, sirens, push bumper, radio, wireless equipment, mobile data computer docking station, partition, equipment storage, cabling, etc.). Unique to what was received, Seaside Premier dealership offers a single package for the purchase of the vehicle and installation. In addition, they are the only dealership with a police rated Chevrolet in stock.
Vehicle Purchase
Vendor
Vehicle
Quote
LEHR
Outfit
Option A
EVS
Outfit
Option B
Seaside
Premier Outfit*
Option C
Total Range (Vehicle +
Outfit)
Chevrolet
Watsonville $65,271.10 $22,437.45 $25,993.32 N/A $87,708.55-$88,264.42 My Chevrolet $58,610.81 $22,347.45 $25,993.32 N/A $80,958.26- $84,604.13 Premier Chevrolet
of Seaside $49,548.03 N/A N/A $26,750.00 $76,298.03
PG CC 12/21/22
321 of 332
*Only available with Seaside Premier vehicle purchase.
Due to the fact Premier has a vehicle in stock, and the combined costs of vehicle purchase and outfitting are the lowest, staff is recommending award to Premier Chevrolet of Seaside.
OPTIONS
1. Provide alternate direction.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The City Council approved a capital outlay project to purchase and outfit a new patrol vehicle in the FY2022/23 Annual Budget, totaling $70,000 for vehicle purchasing, and installation public safety equipment. Funding has been allocated for this project in the Police Department FY2022/23 General Fund Operating Budget under 01-301-6001. The additional $6,500 will come out of the Police Department's general fund operating budget.
GOAL ALIGNMENT: Not Applicable.
Attachments
Quotation
PG CC 12/21/22
322 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
323 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
324 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
325 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
326 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
327 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
328 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
329 of 332
PG CC 12/21/22
330 of 332
Date 11/22/2022
Estimate # 35111
Bill To
Premier Automotive
of Seaside
4 Heitzinger plaza
Seaside, CA 93955
845 FM 407 W
Argyle, TX 76226 [email protected]
903-771-1089
[email protected]
Signature
Customer Contact
Customer Phone
Customer E-mail
Final sale amount may be subject to state and local sales tax. PLEASE NOTE: Once this estimate has been approved, either by signature on this form, written approval referencing the estimate number or the issuance of purchase order, any changes or cancellations of parts made by the customer are subject to a 25% restocking fee. Any addtional customer-requested parts/services will be added to the total amount of the sale.
Estimate
By
Description Location
2023 Chevrolet Tahoe PPV - White Exterior
Pacific Grove Police Department
Defender Supply Driver Side Spot Light with LED Bulb for 2021+ Chevrolet Tahoe 9C1 & SSV. Includes Installation.
Defender Supply TAHOE Marked Patrol Base Package
- Whelen 54" Legacy WeCanX DUO Lightbar with Integrated Traffic Advisor and Full Across Take Down/Alley Lighting, Progressing Flash Patterns with Slide Switch, Cruise, Photo Cell Daylight Sensing, Low Power (R/W, B/W Font And Side, R/A, B/A Rear) with Strap Kit. - Core Controller, SYNC Module, Output Expansion
Module, 100 Watt Speaker and Bracket. Wired and Programmed to Defender Supply Standard. - Steel Push Bumper with Textured Coating and 6 Tri Color Super LED Light Heads (R/B/W), 4 in the Top Channel Cutouts and 1 on Each Side with 45º Brackets. Take Down, Alley Lighting, Progressing Flash Patterns with Slide Switch, Cruise and Low Power Capabilities. - 2 Tri Color Super LED Light Heads (R/B/W) Mounted on Rear License Plate Bracket. Reverse / Brake Lighting, Progressing Flash Patterns with Slide Switch, Cruise and Low Power Capabilities. - 1 Front Cabin and 2 Hatch Dome Lights.
- Contoured Police Console With Dual Cup Holder, Arm Rest and 2 Magnetic Mic Clips. - Defender Supply Wiring Harnesses, Power Distribution Block and Battery Management System. - Includes Installation.
Defender Supply TAHOE Traffic Advisor Package
- 1 Eight Dual Color Module Super LED Full Function Light Stick (R/A, B/A) with Progressing Flash Patterns with Slide Switch, Cruise, Low Power Functions Mounted on Rear Hatch Behind Glass with Vehicle Specific Shroud and Brackets. ...
- 2, Dual Color Super LED Light Heads (R/B), Mounted Horizontally Under The Hatch on Each Corner, Rear Facing When Open. Includes Installation.