Agenda packet, regular meeting — Pacific Grove City Council, October 16, 2024

CITY COUNCIL

SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA
Wednesday, October 16, 2024, 5:00 P.M.

Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA Under the Brown Act, public comment for matters on the agenda must relate to that agenda item and public comments for matters not on the agenda must relate to the subject matter jurisdiction of this legislative body. This is a warning that if a member of the public attending this meeting remotely or in-person violates the Brown Act by failing to comply with these requirements of the Brown Act, then the Mayor or Chair may request that speaker be muted. If a member of the public attending this meeting in-person engages in disruptive behavior that disturbs the orderly conduct of the meeting, they may be removed from the meeting after a warning, pursuant to Council Policy 000-17.

PACIFIC GROVE MEETINGS ARE CONDUCTED IN PERSON AT CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER AND VIRTUALLY.

PLEASE NOTE THE MEETING WILL PROCEED AS NORMAL EVEN IF THERE ARE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES ACCESSING ZOOM.

THE CITY WILL DO ITS BEST TO RESOLVE ANY TECHNICAL ISSUES AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.

Join the Zoom Meeting to participate live at:
https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/Zoom_Closed
Please click here for directions to dial into the meeting audio.

AGENDA

CALL TO ORDER

APPROVAL OF AGENDA

SPECIAL MEETING

PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION MATTERS
Comments from the public will not receive Council action. Comments must deal with matters on the Closed Session agenda and will be limited to three minutes.

1. Written Public Comment
A. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (54956.9(d)(1) Jackson Sherry v. City of Pacific Grove
United States District Court Civil Action No. 5:24-cv-04166-SVK PGCC 10-16-24

Page 1 ends

ADJOURNMENT
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 2 ends

CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Wednesday, October 16, 2024, 6:00 P.M.

Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA The Council will not begin consideration of any item on this agenda later than 10:00 p.m. unless such consideration is approved. Any items on this agenda not considered this evening will be continued to a future meeting.

Copies of the agenda packet are available for review at the Pacific Grove Library, in the Finance Department, and electronically at www.cityofpacificgrove.org/agendas. The most effective method of communication with the City Council is by sending an email to [email protected]. In order to allow the City Council adequate time to review communication related to an agenda item, it is recommended that the communication be sent no later than 9:00 AM on the day prior to the City Council meeting.

Under the Brown Act, public comment for matters on the agenda must relate to that agenda item and public comments for matters not on the agenda must relate to the subject matter jurisdiction of this legislative body. This is a warning that if a member of the public attending this meeting remotely or in-person violates the Brown Act by failing to comply with these requirements of the Brown Act, then the Mayor or Chair may request that speaker be muted. If a member of the public attending this meeting in-person engages in disruptive behavior that disturbs the orderly conduct of the meeting, they may be removed from the meeting after a warning, pursuant to Council Policy 000-17.

PACIFIC GROVE COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE CONDUCTED IN PERSON AT CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER AND VIRTUALLY.

PLEASE NOTE THE MEETING WILL PROCEED AS NORMAL EVEN IF THERE ARE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES ACCESSING ZOOM.

THE CITY WILL DO ITS BEST TO RESOLVE ANY TECHNICAL ISSUES AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.

THE PUBLIC MAY ALSO VIEW THE MEETING ON PENINSULA CHANNEL 25.

APPEARING TELEPHONICALLY:

Mayor Pro Tem Nick Smith
Hyatt Centric The Pike Long Beach
Maritime Room
285 Bay St,
Long Beach, CA 90802
JOIN THE ZOOM WEBINAR TO PARTICIPATE LIVE AT:
https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/Zoom_CC
Please click here for directions to dial into the meeting audio.

AGENDA
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 3 ends

AGENDA

CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Peake

1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

2. PRESENTATIONS

3. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (City-Related Items Only) A. Report on Closed Session by City Attorney
B. Other

4. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
General Public Comment must deal with matters subject to the jurisdiction of the City and the Council that are not on the Regular Agenda. This is the appropriate place to comment as to items on the Consent Agenda, only if you do not wish to have the item pulled for individual consideration by the Council.

Comments from the public will be limited to three minutes and will not receive Council action. Comments regarding items on the Regular Agenda shall be heard prior to Council’s consideration of such items at the time such items are called. Whenever possible, written correspondence should be submitted to the Council in advance of the meeting, to provide adequate time for its consideration.

A. Written General Public Comment

CONSENT AGENDA
The Consent Agenda deals with routine and non-controversial matters, and may include action on resolutions, ordinances, or other public hearings for which testimony is not anticipated. The vote on the Consent Agenda shall apply to each item that has not been removed. Any member of Council, staff, or the public may remove an item from the Consent Agenda for individual consideration. When items are pulled for discussion, they will be automatically placed at the end of their respective section within the Regular Agenda. One motion shall be made to adopt all non-removed items on the Consent Agenda.

5. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 12. Unfinished and Ongoing Business A. Minutes of the October 2, 2024 Special and Regular Meetings PG 8 Reference: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk
Recommended Action: Approve minutes.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 4 ends

Recommended Action: Approve minutes.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

6. RESOLUTIONS
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 12. Unfinished and Ongoing Business or 13. New Business

7. ORDINANCES
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 11. Public Hearings A. Ordinance Amending Chapter 7.40 of the City’s Municipal Code to Increase Short-Term Rental Penalties in Accordance with SB 60 PG 15
Reference: Matthew Mogensen, City Manager
Recommended Action: Hold second reading and adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter

7.40 of the City’s Municipal Code to Increase Short-Term Rental Penalties in Accordance with SB 60.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

8. REPORTS – INFORMATION ONLY
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 12. Unfinished and Ongoing Business or 13. New Business
A. Core Revenue Report for September 2024 PG 31
Reference: Lori Frati, Finance Manager
Recommended Action:

1. Receive the report.

2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Check Register for September 2024 PG 34
Reference: Lori Frati, Finance Manager
Recommended Action:

1. Receive the Check Register.

2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

9. REPORTS – REQUIRING ACTION
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 12. Unfinished and Ongoing Business or 13. New Business
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 5 ends

A. On-Call Concrete Contractor PG 61
Reference: Joyce Halabi, Deputy Public Works Director
Recommended Action:

Motion to authorize an agreement with Monterey Peninsula Engineering for on-call concrete services agreement in an amount not to exceed $75,000 with one (1) option to extend via mutual letter for one additional year.

1. 2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Agreement with 4Leaf for On-Call Traffic Engineering Services PG 63 Reference: Joyce Halabi, Deputy Public Works Director
Recommended Action:

Motion to authorize the Mayor to sign extensions of the Professional Services Agreement with 4Leaf for On-Call Traffic Engineering Services.

1. 2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

10. MEETING MINUTES OF COMMISSIONS, BOARDS, AND COMMITTEES Items pulled from this section will be placed under 13. New Business

REGULAR AGENDA

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
For public hearings involving a quasi-judicial determination by the Council, the proponent of an item may be given 10 minutes to speak and others in support of the proponent’s position may be given three minutes each. A designated spokesperson for opposition to the item may be given 10 minutes to speak and all others in opposition may be given three minutes each. Very brief rebuttal and surrebuttal may be allowed in the sole discretion of the Council. In public hearings not involving a quasi-judicial determination by the Council, all persons may be given three minutes to speak on the matter.

A. ATC Hotel Project: Adoption of Uncodified Ordinance Conditionally Ordering Vacation of Portion of Sloat Avenue and Proposed Agreement For Purchase Of Right-Of-Way and Joint Escrow Instructions for Sloat Avenue PG 81
Reference: Brian Pierik, City Attorney
Recommended Action:

Motion to Adopt Uncodified Ordinance Conditionally Ordering Vacation of Portion of Sloat Avenue as described in Attachment 1.

1. Motion to authorize the Mayor to sign Proposed Agreement For Purchase Of Right-Of-Way and Joint Escrow Instructions for Portion of Sloat Avenue as described in Attachment 2.

2. PGCC 10-16-24

Page 6 ends

3. Other action related to this agenda item as Council determines appropriate.

CEQA: Environmental Impact Report

12. UNFINISHED AND ONGOING BUSINESS
A. Schedule of Public Hearings to Establish District Boundaries to Transition from the City of Pacific Grove City Council At-Large Election System to a District-Based City Council Election System PG 139
Reference: Matthew Mogensen, City Manager
Recommended Action:

Receive and file Schedule of Public Hearings to Establish District Boundaries to Transition from the City of Pacific Grove City Council At-Large Election System to a District-Based City Council Election System in accordance with California Elections Code § 10010

1. 2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

13. NEW BUSINESS

14. FULL PRESENTATIONS

15. CLOSED SESSION

ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE OF ADA COMPLIANCE: Pursuant to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (Codified At 42 United States Code Section 12101 and 28 Code of Federal Regulations Part 35), and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the City of Pacific Grove does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, disability, age or sexual orientation in the provision of any services, programs, or activities. The City of Pacific Grove does not discriminate against persons with disabilities. City Hall is an accessible facility. A limited number of assisted listening devices will be available at this meeting. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting or provide the requested agenda format.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 7 ends

Agenda No. 5 A

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk/DEI Coordinator
MEETING DATE: October 16, 2024
SUBJECT: Minutes of the October 2, 2024 Special and Regular Meetings CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION
Approve minutes.

Attachments
Draft Minutes 10-2-24
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 8 ends

1 DRAFT MEETING MINUTES

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE

CITY COUNCIL

SPECIAL MEETING
Wednesday, October 2, 2024, 5:00 P.M.

Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA Join the Zoom Meeting to participate live at:
https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/Zoom_Closed

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Peake called the regular meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Present in Chamber: Mayor Peake, Mayor Pro Tem Smith, Councilmembers Amelio, Beck, Coletti, McDonnell, and Poduri.

APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Amelio and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Smith, Council voted 7-0 to approve the agenda.

SPECIAL MEETING

PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION MATTERS
Public comments received from Jane Haines, Anthony Ciani, and Inge Lorentzen Daumer.

1. Written Public Comment
A. Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Government Code § 54956.8) Property: Sloat Avenue between Eardley Avenue and Dewey Avenue Agency Negotiator(s): Matthew Mogensen, City Manager
Negotiating Party(ies): Foursome Development Company and CCS Pacific Grove Manager, LLC and Comstock
Under negotiation: Price
DRAFT
and terms of payment
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 9 ends

2 DRAFT MEETING MINUTES

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE

CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, October 2, 2024, 6:00 P.M.

Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA JOIN THE ZOOM WEBINAR TO PARTICIPATE LIVE AT:
https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/Zoom_CC

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Peake called the regular meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Present in Chamber: Mayor Peake, Mayor Pro Tem Smith, Councilmembers Amelio, Beck, Coletti, McDonnell, and Poduri.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

Councilmember Amelio led the pledge of allegiance.

1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Action: Mayor Peake recommended that Regular Agenda item 12B be tabled to a date uncertain due to the donor pulling their application.

Action: Upon motion by Mayor Pro Tem Smith and seconded by Councilmember Amelio, Council voted 7-0 to approve the agenda as modified.

2. PRESENTATIONS
A. Mayor's Proclamation: Museum Foundation
Action: Received the proclamation.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

3. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (City-Related Items Only) A. Report on Closed Session by City Attorney
Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Government Code § 54956.8) Property: Sloat Avenue between Eardley Avenue and Dewey Avenue Agency Negotiator(s): Matthew Mogensen, City Manager
Negotiating Party(ies): Foursome Development Company and CCS Pacific Grove Manager, LLC and Comstock
Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment
City Attorney Brian Pierik reported no action was taken.

B. Council and staff made general announcements.

4. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
General public comment received from Jill Kleiss, Susan Goldbeck, Madeleine Clark, DRAFT PGCC 10-16-24

Page 10 ends

3 Mike Gibbs, Vince Tuminello, Acting Police Chief Brian Anderson, Carmelita Garcia, and Dixie Layne.

A. Written General Public Comment

CONSENT AGENDA
Action: Consent Agenda item 8B was pulled and considered immediately following the Consent Agenda.

Action: Upon motion by Mayor Pro Tem Smith and seconded by Councilmember Amelio, Council voted 7-0, to approve the Consent Agenda as modified.

5. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
A. Minutes of the September 4, 2024, City Council Regular Meeting Action: Approved minutes.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Minutes of the September 18, 2024 City Council Regular Meeting Action: Approved minutes.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

6. RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution Authorizing Investment of Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
Action: Rescinded Resolution 23-010; and approved Resolution No. 24-041 authorizing the investment of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF).

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

7. ORDINANCES
A. Ordinance Amending the Operating and Capital Budget for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 Action: Held second reading and adopted Ordinance No. 24-015 amending the operating and capital budget for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

8. REPORTS – INFORMATION ONLY
A. Housing Element Monthly Status Update
Action: Received the report.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Climate Action and Adaptation Planning Committee This item was pulled and considered immediately after the Consent Agenda.

Reference: Climate Action and Planning Committee Chair Lori McDonnell and Vice-Chair Cathy Wooten
Action: Receive report on Climate Action and Adaptation Planning Committee status.

DRAFT PGCC 10-16-24

Page 11 ends

4 CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

9. REPORTS – REQUIRING ACTION
A. Contract Amendment for Professional Services
Action: Approved Amendment #1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Catacutan Consulting, LLC., increasing the previously approved contract by $50,000 for a total not to exceed amount of $150,000.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. David Avenue Sidewalk Project (CIP23-21) – Award of Contract Action: Awarded an agreement with JMS Cement Contractors, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $510,020 plus a 10% contingency.

CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class I, Existing Facilities
C. Boards, Commissions and Committee Appointments
Action: Approved appointments of Roger O'Sullivan to Recreation Board ending January 31, 2029 and Greg Marshall to the Economic Development Commission ending January 31, 2027.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

10. MEETING MINUTES OF COMMISSIONS, BOARDS, AND COMMITTEES A. Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes: May 15, 2024, June 11, 2024, and July 9, 2024
Action: Received minutes.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes: January 2024 through July 2024 Action: Received minutes.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
*****

8.B. Climate Action and Adaptation Planning Committee
Public comment received from Mike Gibbs and Vince Tuminello.

Action: Received report on Climate Action and Adaptation Planning Committee status.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

REGULAR AGENDA

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Introduction of Proposed Ordinance Amending Chapter 7.40 of the City’s Municipal Code to Increase Short-Term Rental Penalties in Accordance with SB 60 No public comment received.

DRAFT PGCC 10-16-24

Page 12 ends

5 Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Coletti and seconded by Councilmember Beck, Council voted 7-0 to

1. Request the City Attorney read the title of the ordinance;

2. Motion to waive further reading of the ordinance;

3. Introduce and hold first reading of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 7.40 of the City’s Municipal Code to Increase Short-Term Rental Penalties in Accordance with SB 60; and

4. Direct a summary of the proposed ordinance be published as approved by the City Attorney.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

12. UNFINISHED AND ONGOING BUSINESS
A. Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Pacific Grove Declaring Its Intent To Initiate Procedures For A Transition From At-Large To District-Based Council Member Elections
Public comment received from Mike Gibbs and Dixie Layne.

Action: Upon motion by Mayor Pro Tem Smith and seconded by Councilmember Poduri, Council voted 7-0 to

1. Adopt Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Pacific Grove Declaring Its Intent To Initiate Procedures For A Transition From At-Large To District-Based Council Member Elections (Resolution No. 24-042.)

2. Direct the City Manager to develop a tentative timeline for conducting public hearings, formulating proposed district maps scenarios and election sequencing, and present a draft ordinance to the City Council for action.

3. Authorize the Mayor to sign an Agreement with LULAC to extend the date to complete the transition to district-based elections within the safe harbor provisions of Elections Code Section 10010 to March 31, 2025 provided that LULAC agrees to such an extension.

4. Authorize the Mayor to sign a First Amendment to City of Pacific Grove Professional Services Agreement with National Demographic Corporation for further Demographer Services in an amount not to exceed $49,000.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. "The Butterflies" Art Donation Subcommittee Report During the Approval of the Agneda, this item was tabled to a date uncertain due to the donor pulling their application.

Reference: Debby Beck and Luke Coletti, Councilmembers
Action:

1. Receive the report.

2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

13. NEW BUSINESS

14. FULL PRESENTATIONS
DRAFT PGCC 10-16-24

Page 13 ends

6 15. CLOSED SESSION

ADJOURNMENT
Council adjourned the special and regular meetings at 7:26 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted,
Sandra Kandell
City Clerk
Approved by Mayor: _____________________________________________Date________________ Attest by City Manager: __________________________________________Date_________________ DRAFT PGCC 10-16-24

Page 14 ends

Agenda No. 7 A

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Matthew Mogensen, City Manager
MEETING DATE: October 16, 2024
SUBJECT: Ordinance Amending Chapter 7.40 of the City’s Municipal Code to Increase Short-Term Rental Penalties in Accordance with SB 60
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION
Hold second reading and adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 7.40 of the City’s Municipal Code to Increase Short-Term Rental Penalties in Accordance with SB 60.

DISCUSSION
There were no substantive changes between the first and second readings of this ordinance. The City Clerk caused a summary of the ordinance to be published on October 10, 2024.

On July 17, 2024, there was an Agenda Report prepared by Councilmember Luke Coletti regarding a proposed Ordinance to amend the City’s Municipal Code to increase short-term rental penalties in accordance with SB 60 which is codified in Government Code Section 36900. Attachment 1 to this Agenda Report is the July 17, 2024 Agenda Report and Attachment 1 (Proposed Ordinance) and Attachment 2 (Government Code Section 36900). This Agenda item was continued to the City Council meeting on August 7, 2024.

On August 7, 2024, the City Council gave direction to the City Manager to return to the Council with a draft ordinance amending Chapter 7.40 of the City’s Municipal Code to increase short-term rental penalties in accordance with SB 60.

Attachment 2 to this Agenda Report is a proposed Ordinance which would amend Chapter 7.40 of the City’s Municipal Code to increase short-term rental penalties in accordance with SB 60.

The recommended action is to request the City Attorney to read the title of the Ordinance and then waive further reading and introduce the Ordinance and direct a summary of the proposed ordinance be published as approved by the City Attorney.

OPTIONS
Provide alternative direction.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 15 ends

There is no fiscal impact related to enactment of the Ordinance.

FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.

Attachments
1 - AR July 17, 2024 and two Attachments
2 - Proposed Ordinance
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 16 ends

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Councilmember Luke Coletti
MEETING DATE: July 17, 2024
SUBJECT:

Proposed Ordinance Amending Chapter 7.40 of the City’s
Municipal Code to Increase Short-Term Rental Penalties in Accordance with SB 60
CEQA: Does not constitute a “Project” under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION
Direct the City Manager to return within 60 days with a draft ordinance amending Chapter 7.40 of the City’s Municipal Code to increase short-term rental penalties in accordance with SB 60. A proposed draft ordinance is attached (see Attachment-1).

DISCUSSION
California State Law and SB 60:

California Government Section 36901 authorizes the legislative body of a city to impose fines, penalties, and forfeitures for violations of ordinances.

California Government Code Section 36900 limits the maximum fine or penalty amounts for infractions, to $100 for the first violation, $200 for a 2nd violation of the same ordinance within one year of the first violation, and $500 for each additional violation of the same ordinance within one year of the first violation. It also requires a city levying fines pursuant to these provisions to establish a process for granting a hardship waiver in certain cases. Section 1.16.011 of the City’s Municipal Code mirrors this graduated schedule of code infraction fines.

California State Senate Bill 60 (SB 60) increased the maximum fine or penalty amount for violation of an ordinance relating to a residential short-term rental ordinance, that is an infraction and poses a threat to health or safety (e.g., excessive number of occupants), to $1,500 for a first violation, $3,000 for a 2nd violation of the same ordinance within one year, and $5,000 for each additional violation of the same ordinance within one year of the first violation (see Attachment2).

AGENDA REPORT
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 17 ends

Pacific Grove Short-Term Rentals:

Section 7.40.040 of the City’s Municipal Code establishes the following occupancy limit for short-term rentals:
(c) Occupancy Limit. The maximum number of overnight occupants (aged 18 or older) allowed within an STR unit shall be two persons per bedroom, plus one additional person per STR unit. The maximum number of daytime (nonovernight) occupants shall be one and one-half times the maximum number of occupants allowed to stay overnight at the STR unit. The city has sole discretion to determine the final occupancy limit and number of vehicles to be permitted on the STR site. [Ord. 17-024 § 2, 2017].

City code enforcement efforts indicate some lawful short-term rentals are being advertised for occupancies in excess of this limit, which poses a threat to public health and safety.

Pacific Grove voters spoke loud and clear when they adopted Measure M, a citizens’ initiative that prohibits short-term rentals in all residential zoning districts outside of the coastal zone.

Measure M includes the following voter-adopted finding:

The City May Adopt Additional Rules to Facilitate Effective Enforcement. This Initiative is enforceable under existing provisions of the Pacific Grove Municipal Code.

It does not constrain the City’s authority to conduct code enforcement in the manner that best protects the welfare of the entire community.

Operation of unlawful short-term rentals poses a threat to public health and safety.

Conclusion:

The proposed ordinance promotes public health and safety, compliance with exiting law, and helps better protect the City’s residential character, which is consistent with Charter Article 5.5 and General Plan Policy 1.5:

Article 5.5 Residential Character of the City In the exercise of their duties, obligations and authorities, the Council, boards and commissions, officers and employees of the City shall be guided by the determination of the people that Pacific Grove is primarily a city of homes and that business and industry shall be compatible with its residential character.

Policy 1.5 Protect Pacific Grove’s residential character by prohibiting the short-term (less than 30 consecutive calendar days) rental of residential property in residential zoning districts, except to the extent such use is allowed in the Coastal Zone under the Local Coastal Program. The Pacific Grove Municipal Code shall be consistent with this Policy.

Therefore, the Pacific Grove City Council should implement short-term rental penalties consistent with California State Law. Several California cities have already done so.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 18 ends

OPTIONS
Provide alternative direction.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact related to enactment of the Ordinance.

GOAL ALIGNMENT
Not applicable.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Proposed Ordinance

2. Gov Code Section 36900
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 19 ends

1 ORDINANCE NO. 24-XXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE

AMENDING PACIFIC GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE
CHAPTER 7.40 LIMITS ON SHORT-TERM RENTALS

TO CLARIFY ENFORCEMENT OF INFRACTIONS
FACTS

1. The City of Pacific Grove is a Charter City.

2. The City of Pacific Grove enacted and presently implements a Short-Term Rental Program regulated by Pacific Grove Municipal Code (PGMC) Chapter 7.40, as adopted in 2017 by Ordinance. 17-024, and as amended in 2020 by Ordinance 20-027; and

3. In enacting its comprehensive code to regulate issuance of and conditions attached to shortterm rental licenses the City Council found this regulatory program is necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare; and

4. Issues that require regulation of STRs include but are not limited to permitting, tax compliance, noise, parking, and occupancy, as well as host and platform obligations and responsibilities; and

5. This Ordinance further clarifies Chapter 7.40 of the Municipal Code in accord with SB 60 of 2021 as signed into law by Governor Newsom. SB 60 allows cities to impose a fine of up to $5,000 for public and health and safety violations of a short-term rental ordinance; and

6. Adoption of this ordinance to Amend PGMC Chapter 7.40 does not constitute a “Project” Under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 as it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines the foregoing Facts to be true and correct and are therefore incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. Section 7.40.130 “Definitions” of PGMC Title 7, Chapter 7.40 shall be amended by the addition of all text shown below in bold italics text.

7.40.130 Definitions.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 20 ends

2 “Advertising” means signs, circulars, cards, telephone books, newspapers, magazines, posters, email, mobile applications, television, radio, or any other representation implying or stating the property is available for short-term rental use.
“Block” means as designated by Monterey County assessor. “Block density” means STRs on a block divided by parcels on that block, expressed as a percentage.
“Block density limit” means block density of 15 percent.

The terms “owner,” “owner representative,” “person,” “remuneration,” “residential property,” “responsible tenant,” “transient,” “transient use,” “transient use of residential property,” and “transient use site” as used in this chapter shall be given the same definition as those terms in PGMC 23.64.350.
“Residential dwelling” is a term that shall mean a private structure designed and available for use and occupancy as a residence by one or more individuals. “Residential dwelling” does not include a commercially operated hotel, motel, bed and breakfast inn, or time-share property as specified.
“Short-term rental (STR)” is a term that shall mean a short-term rental unit that is rented for periods of less than 30 consecutive days for remuneration. This term shall include or any portion of a residential dwelling, that is rented to a person or persons for 30 consecutive days or less.
“Short-term rental use” or “short-term occupancy” means the use, by any person, of residential property for transient lodging where the term of occupancy, possession, or tenancy of the property by the person entitled to such occupancy, possession, or tenancy is less than 30 consecutive calendar days.
“STR license” shall authorize the short-term rental use of an entire dwelling unit. “STR site manager” shall mean the representative of the person or entity that owns an STR. “Sun-setting” means a method in which licenses are discontinued. The sun-setting determination shall be the result of a lottery to ensure blocks are consistent with a block density limit of 15 percent.
“Zone of exclusion” shall mean the range of 55 feet from an existing STR parcel boundary. Any parcel that is located within the 55-foot zone of exclusion shall be ineligible for an STR license.

SECTION 3. Section 7.40.190 “Penalties” of PGMC Title 7, Chapter 7.40 shall be amended by the addition of all text shown below in bold italics text.

7.40.190 Administrative Penalties.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 21 ends

3 Penalties as set forth in Chapter 1.16 PGMC, or the administrative process set forth in Chapter

1.19 PGMC, may be imposed as Administrative Penalties for failure to comply with the provisions of Chapter 23.64 PGMC or this chapter, with respect to:
(a) Any STR owner, STR site manager, or person who transacts or carries on any activity relating to or supporting the short-term rental use of residential property in the city without first having procured and complied with an STR license from the city and paying all applicable license fees shall be subject to administrative penalties as set forth in Chapter 1.19 PGMC, including administrative penalties imposed by a hearing officer for violation of any provision of this chapter in an amount not to exceed a maximum of $2,500 per day for each continuing violation, in addition to administrative costs, interest and restitution for compliance reinspections, for any related series of violations, and/or forfeiture of all rents received during the period short-term rental use was allowed without an STR license, whichever amount is greater; (b) Any owner, owner representative, responsible tenant, person acting as agent, real estate broker, real estate sales agent, property manager, reservation service or otherwise who advertises the use of residential property in violation of the provisions of this chapter shall be subject to administrative penalties as set forth in Chapter 1.19 PGMC, including administrative penalties imposed by a hearing officer for violation of any provision of this chapter in an amount not to exceed a maximum of $100.00 per day for each continuing violation, in addition to administrative costs, interest, and restitution;
(c) Any STR owner, STR site manager, or person who fails to immediately respond to neighborhood concerns regarding any activity at the short-term rental site and who has failed to timely remedy any violation in response to two or more complaints shall be subject to administrative penalties;
(d) Any STR owner, STR site manager, responsible tenant or person who allows a short-term rental use site to be used or maintained in a manner detrimental to the peace, public health, safety or general welfare of persons or property of the neighborhood or the public, and fails to timely remedy this violation in response to two or more complaints; (e) Any STR owner, STR site manager, responsible tenant or person who allows impermissible or inappropriate behavior at the STR unit or action that exceeds the limits on short-term rental use set by PGMC 7.40.040 following two or more complaints; (f) Limits upon administrative penalties in PGMC 1.19.200 shall not apply to any violation of this chapter.

SECTION 4. Section 7.40.195 “Enforcement of Infractions” of PGMC Title 7, Chapter

7.40 shall be added as shown below in bold italics text.

7.40.195 Enforcement of Infractions.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 22 ends

4 In lieu of, or in addition to any “Administrative Penalties” authorized by PGMC Section

7.40.190, the City may prosecute any violation Short-Term Rental Program regulated by Pacific Grove Municipal Code (PGMC) Chapter 7.40 as an infraction as follows:
(a) Penalty provisions set by this Section shall apply only to infractions that pose a threat to public health and safety, and do not apply to a first-time offense of failure to register or pay a business license fee.
(b) A fine shall not exceed $1,500 for a first violation of Chapter 7.40; (c) A fine shall not exceed $3,000 for a second violation of Chapter 7.40 within twelve consecutive months; and,
(d) A fine shall not exceed $5,000 for each additional violation of Chapter 7.40 within twelve consecutive months from the date of the first violation. (e) A hardship waiver request may be considered to reduce or offset penalty provisions of this section as follows:
(1) The hardship waiver request shall be filed with the city manager on an application form, available from the office of the city manager, within 10 days of the date of the citation. The application shall state the amount of the waiver request, and clearly state all circumstances that justify the waiver.
(2) The requirement to pay the full amount of the fine required by this section shall be stayed unless or until the city manager makes a determination on the hardship waiver request. (3) The cited party shall submit to the city manager a sworn affidavit, together with any supporting documents or materials, demonstrating to the satisfaction of the city manager the person’s actual financial inability to pay to the city the full amount of the fine required by this section.
(4) The city manager shall issue a written determination listing the reasons for his or her determination to issue or not issue the hardship waiver. The written determination of the city manager shall be final.
(5) The written determination of the city manager shall be served upon the person who filed the request for hardship waiver. This determination shall be subject to judicial review pursuant to Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the time limit set by PGMC 1.20.010 shall apply.

SECTION 5. If any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, or any part thereof, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, or any part thereof, or its application to other persons or circumstances. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted each provision, section, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause or PGCC 10-16-24

Page 23 ends

5 phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, paragraphs, subparagraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 6. In accord with Article 15 of the City Charter, this Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after adoption on the second reading.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE THIS ____ day of ____________, 2021, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
____________________________
BILL PEAKE, Mayor
ATTEST:

DATED: _________________________
_________________________________
SANDRA KANDELL, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
BRIAN A. PIERIK, City Attorney
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 24 ends

State of California

GOVERNMENT CODE
Section 36900
36900. (a) Violation of a city ordinance is a misdemeanor unless by ordinance it is made an infraction. The violation of a city ordinance may be prosecuted by city authorities in the name of the people of the State of California, or redressed by civil action.
(b) Every violation determined to be an infraction is punishable by the following:
(1) A fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100) for a first violation. (2) A fine not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200) for a second violation of the same ordinance within one year.
(3) A fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500) for each additional violation of the same ordinance within one year.
(c) Notwithstanding any other law, a violation of local building and safety codes determined to be an infraction is punishable by the following:
(1) A fine not exceeding one hundred thirty dollars ($130) for a first violation. (2) A fine not exceeding seven hundred dollars ($700) for a second violation of the same ordinance within one year.
(3) (A) A fine not exceeding one thousand three hundred dollars ($1,300) for each additional violation of the same ordinance within one year of the first violation. (B) A fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) for each additional violation of the same ordinance within two years of the first violation if the property is a commercial property that has an existing building at the time of the violation and the violation is due to failure by the owner to remove visible refuse or failure to prohibit unauthorized use of the property.
(d) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, including subdivisions (b) and (c), the violation of a short-term rental ordinance that is an infraction is punishable by the following:
(A) A fine not exceeding one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for a first violation.
(B) A fine not exceeding three thousand dollars ($3,000) for a second violation of the same ordinance within one year.
(C) A fine not exceeding five thousand dollars ($5,000) for each additional violation of the same ordinance within one year of the first violation. (2) For purposes of this section, “short-term rental” means a residential dwelling, or any portion of a residential dwelling, that is rented to a person or persons for 30 consecutive days or less.
(3) For purposes of this section, “residential dwelling” means a private structure that is designed and available, pursuant to applicable law, for use and occupancy by

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

AUTHENTICATED

ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 25 ends

one or more individuals. “Residential dwelling” does not include a commercially operated hotel, motel, bed and breakfast inn, or a time-share property as defined by subdivision (aa) of Section 11212 of the Business and Professions Code. (4) The fine limits set by this subdivision apply only to infractions that pose a threat to public health or safety. The fines described in this subdivision shall not apply to a first time offense of failure to register or pay a business license fee. Nothing in this subdivision limits the authority of a city, or city and county, to establish lower fines for specific violations by ordinance.
(e) A city levying a fine pursuant to paragraphs (2) and (3) of subdivisions (b) and (c), and paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), shall establish a process for granting a hardship waiver to reduce the amount of the fine upon a showing by the responsible party that the responsible party has made a bona fide effort to comply after the first violation and that payment of the full amount of the fine would impose an undue financial burden on the responsible party.
(Amended by Stats. 2021, Ch. 307, Sec. 2. (SB 60) Effective September 24, 2021.) PGCC 10-16-24

Page 26 ends

1 ORDINANCE NO. 24-XXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE

AMENDING PACIFIC GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE
CHAPTER 7.40 LIMITS ON SHORT-TERM RENTALS

TO CLARIFY ENFORCEMENT OF INFRACTIONS
FACTS

1. The City of Pacific Grove is a Charter City.

4. Issues that require regulation of STRs include but are not limited to permitting, tax compliance, noise, parking, and occupancy, as well as host and platform obligations and responsibilities; and

5. This Ordinance further clarifies Chapter 7.40 of the Municipal Code in accord with SB 60 of 2021 as signed into law by Governor Newsom. SB 60 allows cities to impose a fine of up to $5,000 for public health or safety violations of a short-term rental ordinance; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines the foregoing Facts to be true and correct and are therefore incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. Section 7.40.195 “Enforcement of Infractions Posing a Threat to Public Health or Safety” of PGMC Title 7, Chapter 7.40 shall be added as shown below in bold italics text.

7.40.195 Enforcement of Infractions Posing a Threat to Public Health or Safety.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 27 ends

2 In lieu of, or in addition to any “Penalties” authorized by PGMC Section 7.40.190, the City may prosecute any person for any violation of the Short-Term Rental Program regulated by Pacific Grove Municipal Code (PGMC) Chapter 7.40 as an infraction as follows:
(a) Penalty provisions set by this Section shall apply only to infractions that pose a threat to public health or safety as enumerated in subsection (g). In no case shall such penalties exceed maximum fine amounts established pursuant to California Government Code Section 36900 et seq., or future amendments thereof.
(b) A fine shall not exceed $100.00 for a first violation for failure to license a short-term rental where short-term rental use of the residential property is an allowed use. Where short -term rental use of the residential property is not an allowed use, 7.40.195(c) shall apply. (c) A fine shall not exceed $1,500 for any other first violation of Chapter 7.40; (d) A fine shall not exceed $3,000 for a second violation of Chapter 7.40 within twelve consecutive months; and,
(e) A fine shall not exceed $5,000 for each additional violation of Chapter 7.40 within twelve consecutive months from the date of the first violation. (f) A hardship waiver request may be considered to reduce or offset penalty provisions of this section as follows:
(1) The hardship waiver request shall be filed with the city manager on an application form, available from the office of the city manager, within 10 days of the date of the citation. The application shall state the amount of the waiver request, and clearly state all circumstances that justify the waiver.
(2) The requirement to pay the full amount of the fine required by this section shall be stayed unless or until the city manager makes a determination on the hardship waiver request. (3) The cited party shall submit to the city manager a sworn affidavit, together with any supporting documents or materials, demonstrating to the satisfaction of the city manager the person’s actual financial inability to pay to the city the full amount of the fine required by this section.
(4) The city manager shall issue a written determination listing the reasons for his or her determination to issue or not issue the hardship waiver. The written determination of the city manager shall be final.
(5) The written determination of the city manager shall be served upon the person who filed the request for hardship waiver. This determination shall be subject to judicial review pursuant to Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the time limit set by PGMC 1.20.010 shall apply.
(g) Infractions which pose a threat to public health or safety are the following:

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 28 ends

3 (1) Short-term rental use of residential property without a valid STR license; (2) Exceeding allowable occupancy limits (overnight);
(3) Exceeding allowable occupancy limits (daytime);
(4) Violation of the city’s codified noise ordinance;
(5) Operation of auctions, commercial functions, or other similar events; (6) Failure to dispose of solid waste;
(7) Failure to properly store waste and refuse bins;
(8) The STR owner, site manager, guest or any occupant of an STR unit engages in disorderly conduct at that site; and
(9) Any other incident or conduct which, upon the determination of the City Code Compliance Officer, poses a threat to public health or safety.

SECTION 3. If any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, or any part thereof, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, or any part thereof, or its application to other persons or circumstances. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted each provision, section, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, paragraphs, subparagraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 4. In accord with Article 15 of the City Charter, this Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after adoption on the second reading.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE THIS ____ day of ____________, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
____________________________
BILL PEAKE, Mayor
ATTEST:

DATED: _________________________
_________________________________
SANDRA KANDELL, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 29 ends

4 _________________________________
BRIAN A. PIERIK, City Attorney
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 30 ends

Agenda No. 8 A

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lori Frati, Finance Manager
MEETING DATE: October 16, 2024
SUBJECT: Core Revenue Report for September 2024
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION

1. Receive the report.

2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

DISCUSSION
The City of Pacific Grove's General Fund revenues are primarily derived from Property Tax, Transient Occupancy Tax and Sales and Use Tax revenues. In the Fiscal Year 24/25 Approved Budget, these three revenue sources were estimated to generate approximately $23 million. These revenues account for approximately 70% of the General Fund's ongoing revenues.

Details on the budgeted amounts and revenue to date are included in Attachment 1.

OPTIONS
N/A - This is information only.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with receiving this report.

FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.

Attachments
Core Revenue Report
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 31 ends

Core Revenue Report
Fiscal Year 2024/25
September
The following tables include the FY24/25 budget and year to date revenues. The receipts represent funds received to date.

PROPERTY TAX
Property Tax is the first largest source of the General Fund revenue. The City typically receives property tax payments in December, April, and June. The following table presents Fiscal Year 2024/25 budget, and revenues received to date.

Property Tax Adopted Budget YTD Receipts % of Adopted Budget FY24/25 10,296,000 0 0%

TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX (TOT)
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is the General Fund’s second-largest source of revenue which the City receives on a monthly basis. The following table presents Fiscal Year 2024/25 budget and revenues received to date.

Transient Occupancy Tax Adopted Budget YTD Receipts % of Adopted Budget FY24/25 6,922,000 1,718,439 25%
The City receives transient occupancy tax in the month following the stay. The revenues received in September are for the August lodging period.

The following table shows a monthly breakdown of TOT revenues when compared to the same month last year.

Lodging Period 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 Net Difference
July 797,756 834,401 837,115 2,714
August 818,939 795,551 881,324 85,773
September 639,644 671,498
October 589,714 640,567
November 411,136 433,937
December 371,160 366,055
January 370,713 371,289
February 336,276 294,952
March 446,634 538,604
April 574,513 569,017
May 623,891 548,249
June 573,141 666,120
Total 6,553,517 6,730,240 1,718,439 88,487
September revenues are expected to be received in late October as the City receives taxes one month in the arrears.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 32 ends

SALES AND USE TAX
Sales and Use tax are the third largest source of the City’s General Fund revenues. The City receives a 1% Bradley Burns Tax, a 1% Measure U Transactions and Use Tax and Measure A revenues, a 0.50% Transactions and Use Tax.

The following table presents the Fiscal Year 24/25 budget and revenues received to date.

Sales and Use Tax Adopted Budget YTD Receipts % of Adopted Budget FY24/25 6,094,000 530,124 9%
The following table presents Fiscal Year 2024/25 revenues received to date.

Remittance Period 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 Net Difference July Advance 350,801 464,029 530,124 66,095
August Advance 364,694 444,973
September True-up 475,273 690,001
October Advance 411,967 411,284
November Advance 424,467 499,859
December True-up 658,665 570,119
January Advance 368,119 385,286
February Advance 384,955 482,865
March True-up 621,062 556,659
April Advance 468,572 365,146
May Advance 498,977 524,696
June True-Up 556,703 - - -
Total 4,540,782 5,584,256 530,124 66,095
August 2024 payments are anticipated to be received in late October as the State pays the City two months in arrears

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 33 ends

Agenda No. 8 B

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lori Frati, Finance Manager
MEETING DATE: October 16, 2024
SUBJECT: Check Register for September 2024
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION

1. Receive the Check Register.

2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

DISCUSSION
The check register is a detailed account of monthly expenditures. It provides budgetary insight and promotes transparency. It is an excellent counterpart to the City's monthly Core Revenue Report, and is a practice followed by many other local jurisdictions.

The check register is produced from the City’s financial system. The report groups the checks by the respective city fund and vendor. The check register includes the check number, the check issue date, the name of the vendor, and a description of the purchase and the amount of the check.

Attached is the check register report for September 2024. The monthly total is provided on the last page of the report.

OPTIONS
N/A - This is informational only.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact. This is informational only.

FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.

Attachments
Attachment 1 - Check Register by Vendor
Attachment 2 - Check Register by Fund
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 34 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
01 - GENERAL FUND 4LEAF BUILDING DEPT SERVI 2,475.38
01 - GENERAL FUND 4LEAF BUILDING DEPT SERVI 85,978.60
01 - GENERAL FUND 4LEAF BUILDING DEPT SERVI 90,577.30
01 - GENERAL FUND 4LEAF BUILDING DEPT SERVI 152.00
01 - GENERAL FUND 4LEAF BUILDING DEPT SERVI 11,053.35
4LEAF Total 190,236.63
01 - GENERAL FUND ACCENT CLEAN & SWEE STREET SWEEPING 18,810.00 01 - GENERAL FUND ACCENT CLEAN & SWEE STREET SWEEPING 19,208.00 ACCENT CLEAN & SWEE Total 38,018.00
01 - GENERAL FUND AFLAC DED:5200 AFLAC PREM 742.39
01 - GENERAL FUND AFLAC DED:5201 AFLAC P/T 1,588.80
01 - GENERAL FUND AFLAC DED:5200 AFLAC PREM 742.39
01 - GENERAL FUND AFLAC DED:5201 AFLAC P/T 1,588.80
AFLAC Total 4,662.38
01 - GENERAL FUND ALEXANDRA BELECHE RFND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 75.00 ALEXANDRA BELECHE Total 75.00
01 - GENERAL FUND ALHAMBRA & SIERRA S FD WATER SVCS JULY 207.94 01 - GENERAL FUND ALHAMBRA & SIERRA S FD WATER SVCS AUG 219.53 ALHAMBRA & SIERRA S Total 427.47
01 - GENERAL FUND ALICIA CUADRA-CUTLE RFND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 206.00 ALICIA CUADRA-CUTLE Total 206.00
01 - GENERAL FUND ALTERNATOR STARTER REPAIR PD UNIT 8 355.06 01 - GENERAL FUND ALTERNATOR STARTER REPAIR STREET UNIT 361.56 ALTERNATOR STARTER Total 716.62
01 - GENERAL FUND AMAZON CAPITAL SERV SAFETY BOOTS BRANDO 199.80 01 - GENERAL FUND AMAZON CAPITAL SERV ASBESTOS TESTING KI 45.82 01 - GENERAL FUND AMAZON CAPITAL SERV PW PAPER 32.40
01 - GENERAL FUND AMAZON CAPITAL SERV B&G GRASS SEED 114.00 01 - GENERAL FUND AMAZON CAPITAL SERV OFFICE SUPPLIES 126.18 01 - GENERAL FUND AMAZON CAPITAL SERV FIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 35.84 01 - GENERAL FUND AMAZON CAPITAL SERV BOOKS & MATERIALS 212.24 01 - GENERAL FUND AMAZON CAPITAL SERV MEETING ORGANIZER 29.44 01 - GENERAL FUND AMAZON CAPITAL SERV PW OFFICE SUPPLIES 9.13 01 - GENERAL FUND AMAZON CAPITAL SERV FINANCE OFF SUPPLIE 15.23 01 - GENERAL FUND AMAZON CAPITAL SERV PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 15.26 01 - GENERAL FUND AMAZON CAPITAL SERV LIBRARY SUPPLIES 93.83 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV Total 929.17
01 - GENERAL FUND AMERICAN SUPPLY COM JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 2,006.11 01 - GENERAL FUND AMERICAN SUPPLY COM JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 2,409.84 01 - GENERAL FUND AMERICAN SUPPLY COM CLEANING EQUIP RENT 127.24 01 - GENERAL FUND AMERICAN SUPPLY COM JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 92.97 01 - GENERAL FUND AMERICAN SUPPLY COM ALCOHOL HAND WIPES 100.51 01 - GENERAL FUND AMERICAN SUPPLY COM COMPOST UTENSILS 147.16 01 - GENERAL FUND AMERICAN SUPPLY COM JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 46.43 AMERICAN SUPPLY COM Total 4,930.26
01 - GENERAL FUND ANDREA M. MORELAND BACKGROUNDS PD 2,254.60 ANDREA M. MORELAND Total 2,254.60
01 - GENERAL FUND ANDY LIPSIG REIMB POOL SUPPLIES 12.75 ANDY LIPSIG Total 12.75
01 - GENERAL FUND ARTHUR KING RFND DAMGE DEPOSIT 206.00 ARTHUR KING Total
PGCC 10-16-24
206.00

Page 35 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
01 - GENERAL FUND ASHLEIGH EASTMAN RFND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 206.00 ASHLEIGH EASTMAN Total 206.00
01 - GENERAL FUND AT&T LH INTERNET 1267 106.29
01 - GENERAL FUND AT&T REC PHONE 0960 31.81
01 - GENERAL FUND AT&T ADMIN 2539 31.81
AT&T Total 169.91
01 - GENERAL FUND AT&T CALNET 3 CH GNRTR ALARM 31.86
01 - GENERAL FUND AT&T CALNET 3 ADMIN INTERNET 3342 31.41 01 - GENERAL FUND AT&T CALNET 3 LIBRARY INTERNET 33 247.40 01 - GENERAL FUND AT&T CALNET 3 PD DATA LINE 8120 1,046.42 01 - GENERAL FUND AT&T CALNET 3 ADMIN PHONE 3242 2,124.17 AT&T CALNET 3 Total 3,481.26
01 - GENERAL FUND AT&T MOBILITY DEPARTMENT CELL PHO 1,833.62 01 - GENERAL FUND AT&T MOBILITY LIBRARY PHONE 80.48
AT&T MOBILITY Total 1,914.10
01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP BOOKS & MATERIALS / 195.81 01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP BOOKS & MATERIALS / 837.53 01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP BOOKS & MATERIALS / 1,097.38 01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP BOOKS & MATERIALS / 1,872.52 01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP BOOKS & MATERIALS / 59.20 01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP BOOKS & MATERIALS / 63.06 01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP BOOKS & MATERIALS / 101.60 01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP LIBRARY SUPPLIES (6.99) 01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP LIBRARY SUPPLIES 15.15 01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP LIBRARY SUPPLIES 25.51 01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP LIBRARY SUPPLIES 25.81 01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP LIBRARY SUPPLIES 30.43 01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP LIBRARY SUPPLIES 123.46 01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP BOOKS & MATERIALS / 170.77 01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP BOOKS & MATERIALS / 322.14 01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP BOOKS & MATERIALS / 325.10 01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP BOOKS & MATERIALS / 350.96 01 - GENERAL FUND BAKER & TAYLOR COMP BOOKS & MATERIALS / 1,256.20 BAKER & TAYLOR COMP Total 6,865.64
01 - GENERAL FUND BAVCO TEST KIT CALIBRATIO 122.10
BAVCO Total 122.10
01 - GENERAL FUND BECKS SHOES AND REP PHILIP DE SILVA BOO 204.30 01 - GENERAL FUND BECKS SHOES AND REP CHAD THOMAS BOOTS 162.50 01 - GENERAL FUND BECKS SHOES AND REP PAUL HUGHES BOOTS 213.58 BECKS SHOES AND REP Total 580.38
01 - GENERAL FUND BETTER VIEW WINDOW LIBRARY WINDOW CLEA 3,500.00 BETTER VIEW WINDOW Total 3,500.00
01 - GENERAL FUND BLUE STAR INVESTIGA BACKGROUNDS 2,880.00 BLUE STAR INVESTIGA Total 2,880.00
01 - GENERAL FUND BOB MURRAY & ASSOCI CLERICAL SUPPORT 289.92 BOB MURRAY & ASSOCI Total 289.92
01 - GENERAL FUND BOOT BARN INC MARCO BOOTS 250.00
BOOT BARN INC Total 250.00
01 - GENERAL FUND BOUND TREE MEDICAL, MEDICAL SUPPLIES 261.10 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, Total 261.10
01 - GENERAL FUND BRIAN WHITSON MUSEUM CLEANING FY2
PGCC 10-16-24
2,100.00

Page 36 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
01 - GENERAL FUND BRIAN WHITSON MUSEUM CLEANING FY2 2,100.00 01 - GENERAL FUND BRIAN WHITSON CITY HALL CLEANING 380.00 01 - GENERAL FUND BRIAN WHITSON CITY HALL CLEANING 380.00 01 - GENERAL FUND BRIAN WHITSON CITY HALL CLEANING 380.00 BRIAN WHITSON Total 5,340.00
01 - GENERAL FUND BUREAU VERITAS TECH CITY FACILITY CONDI 4,141.60 BUREAU VERITAS TECH Total 4,141.60
01 - GENERAL FUND BURKE, WILLIAMS & S CITY ATTORNEY SERVI 70,252.55 01 - GENERAL FUND BURKE, WILLIAMS & S CITY ATTORNEY SERVI 88,694.30 BURKE, WILLIAMS & S Total 158,946.85
01 - GENERAL FUND BYWATER SOLUTIONS, KOHA SUPPORT & HOST 8,411.00 BYWATER SOLUTIONS, Total 8,411.00
01 - GENERAL FUND CA DEPT OF JUSTICE DOJ LIVESCANS 177.00 CA DEPT OF JUSTICE Total 177.00
01 - GENERAL FUND CA DEPT OF TAXES AN OVERDRIVE SALES TAX 1.11 01 - GENERAL FUND CA DEPT OF TAXES AN PF PETTIBONE SALES 13.88 01 - GENERAL FUND CA DEPT OF TAXES AN WYSIWASH SALES TAX 18.50 01 - GENERAL FUND CA DEPT OF TAXES AN LIB IDEAS SALES TAX 20.82 01 - GENERAL FUND CA DEPT OF TAXES AN GOPHER SALES TAX 127.68 CA DEPT OF TAXES AN Total 181.99
01 - GENERAL FUND CALIF LAW ENFORCMEN DED:3200 LTD PD 672.00 CALIF LAW ENFORCMEN Total 672.00
01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 139 GRAND AVE 85.30 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 300 FOREST IRRIG 96.61 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN B & G 15% 102.15
01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 304 16TH ST FIRE 102.35 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 130 LIGHTHOUSE IRRI 106.40 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 585 LAUREL 106.40 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 114 CALEDONIA PK 2,797.56 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 707 OCEANVIEW-NAIAD 2,984.51 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 616 OCEANVW-SWIM PL 3,484.67 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 616 OCEANVIEW IRRG 4,399.45 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 230 17-MILE DRIVE 5,450.43 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 980 PIEDMONT BALL P 5,829.17 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 150 FOREST-JEWELL P 7,679.05 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 391 OCEANVW-BERWICK 15,970.75 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 300 FOREST AVE 210.87 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 196 OCEANVW IRRIG 210.87 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 100 OCEANVW IRRIG 245.03 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 429 LIGHTHOUSE IRRG 251.89 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 263 GROVE ACRES 262.38 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 165 FOREST-MUSEUM 335.85 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 600 PINE 337.22
01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 515 JUNIPERO 342.16 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 304 16TH ST BDOM-FR 376.08 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 580 PINE 413.48
01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 1051 OCEANVIEW IRRG 430.15 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 300 FOREST 476.51 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 610 OCEANVW IRRIGPK 852.84 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 550 CENTRAL 989.51 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 930 SINEX
PGCC 10-16-24
1,067.75

Page 37 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 1025 MORSE-PLATT PK 1,425.40 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 863 OCEANVIEW IRRG 1,676.34 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 711 OCEANVIEW IRRG 1,850.01 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 620 OCEANVIEW/BATH 2,399.09 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 165 FOREST AVE FIRE 61.01 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN CENTRAL 4 IN FIRE 61.01 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 600 PINE AVE FIRE 61.01 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 800 LIGHTHSE PLANTE 43.72 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 792 LIGHTHSE IRRIG 43.72 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 582 LIGHTHSE IRRIG 43.72 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 643 HYDRANTS HYDT 46.93 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 300 FOREST FIRE-50% 30.50 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 300 FOREST FIRE-50% 30.51 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN MECH 5% 34.05
01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 2100 SUNSET DRIVE 43.72 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 840 LIGHTHSE PLANTE 43.72 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 850 LIGHTHSE PLANTE 43.72 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 882 LIGHTHSE PLANTE 43.72 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 106 7TH ST PARK 43.72 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 308 16TH ST. 43.72 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 748 LIGHTHSE IRRG 43.72 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 765 LIGHTHSE IRRIG 43.72 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN SUNSET-CORPYARD18% 122.57 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 611 CENTRAL AVE 165.28 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 619 OCEANVIEW 64.46 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 711 OCEANVIEW IRRG 2,512.08 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 707 OCEANVIEW-NAIAD 2,960.50 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 980 PIEDMONT BALL P 3,434.37 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 863 OCEANVIEW IRRG 4,035.99 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 230 17-MILE DRIVE 4,386.10 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 616 OCEANVIEW IRRG 4,631.40 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 150 FOREST-JEWELL P 7,036.35 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 391 OCEANVW-BERWICK 14,671.25 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 850 LIGHTHSE PLANTE 43.11 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 882 LIGHTHSE PLANTE 43.11 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 106 7TH ST PARK 43.11 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 643 HYDRANTS HYDT 46.28 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN CENTRAL 4 IN FIRE 60.16 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 600 PINE AVE FIRE 60.16 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 165 FOREST AVE FIRE 60.16 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 165 FOREST-MUSEUM 350.82 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 304 16TH ST BDOM-FR 362.88 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 580 PINE 411.44
01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 515 JUNIPERO 415.36 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 263 GROVE ACRES 522.94 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 300 FOREST 532.76 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 610 OCEANVW IRRIGPK 677.27 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 1051 OCEANVIEW IRRG 954.66 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 550 CENTRAL 1,010.27 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 1025 MORSE-PLATT PK 1,355.74 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 620 OCEANVIEW/BATH PGCC 10-16-24
1,750.13

Page 38 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 930 SINEX 1,861.82 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 616 OCEANVW-SWIM PL 2,099.43 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 611 CENTRAL AVE 188.23 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 100 OCEANVW IRRIG 207.93 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 196 OCEANVW IRRIG 207.93 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 300 FOREST AVE 207.93 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 600 PINE 274.70
01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 2100 SUNSET DRIVE 43.11 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 840 LIGHTHSE PLANTE 43.11 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 139 GRAND AVE 78.22 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN B & G 15% 84.96
01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 304 16TH ST FIRE 100.93 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN SUNSET-CORPYARD18% 101.95 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 585 LAUREL 104.92 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 130 LIGHTHOUSE IRRI 104.92 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 300 FOREST IRRIG 160.23 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN MECH 5% 28.32
01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 300 FOREST FIRE-50% 30.08 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 300 FOREST FIRE-50% 30.08 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 308 16TH ST. 43.11 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 748 LIGHTHSE IRRG 43.11 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 800 LIGHTHSE PLANTE 43.11 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 792 LIGHTHSE IRRIG 43.11 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 582 LIGHTHSE IRRIG 43.11 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 765 LIGHTHSE IRRIG 43.11 01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 114 CALEDONIA PK 2,593.78 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN Total 125,686.12
01 - GENERAL FUND CALIFORNIA PRESERVA ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP C 250.00 CALIFORNIA PRESERVA Total 250.00
01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:119 HEALTH 1,480.52 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:105 HEALTH 1,189.27 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:124 HEALTH 1,230.89 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:126 HEALTH 1,230.90 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:112 HEALTH 904.95
01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:116 HEALTH 914.82
01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:121 HEALTH 946.84
01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:127 HEALTH 946.84
01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:108 HEALTH 1,708.55 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:2071 HEALTH 1,862.00 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:125 HEALTH 2,461.78 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:104 HEALTH 2,744.46 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:123 HEALTH 2,840.52 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:103 HEALTH 3,201.87 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:533 HEALTH 3,567.81 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:2072 HEALTH 4,234.00 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:106 HEALTH 4,599.98 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:531 HEALTH 350.62
01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:3051 HEALTH EMP 510.71 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:109 HEALTH 569.42
01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:2073 HEALTH FAM 7,953.00 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:122 HEALTH
PGCC 10-16-24
7,101.30

Page 39 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:108 HEALTH 1,708.55 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:121 HEALTH 946.84
01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:125 HEALTH 2,461.78 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:104 HEALTH 2,744.46 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:2072 HEALTH 3,175.50 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:112 HEALTH 904.95
01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:116 HEALTH 914.82
01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:3051 HEALTH EMP 1,021.42 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:105 HEALTH 1,189.27 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:124 HEALTH 1,230.89 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:126 HEALTH 1,230.90 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:2071 HEALTH 1,862.00 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:103 HEALTH 3,201.87 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:533 HEALTH 3,567.81 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:123 HEALTH 3,787.36 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:119 HEALTH 1,480.52 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:106 HEALTH 5,257.12 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:2073 HEALTH FAM 7,953.00 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:122 HEALTH 8,521.56 01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:109 HEALTH 569.42
01 - GENERAL FUND CALPERS HEALTH DED:531 HEALTH 350.62
CALPERS HEALTH Total 106,631.71
01 - GENERAL FUND CALTRONICS BUSINESS KONICA COPIES FY 24 101.12 01 - GENERAL FUND CALTRONICS BUSINESS KONICA COPIES FY 24 107.80 01 - GENERAL FUND CALTRONICS BUSINESS KONICA COPIES FY 24 141.28 01 - GENERAL FUND CALTRONICS BUSINESS KONICA COPIES FY 24 142.85 01 - GENERAL FUND CALTRONICS BUSINESS KONICA COPIES FY 24 193.83 01 - GENERAL FUND CALTRONICS BUSINESS KONICA COPIES FY 24 201.38 01 - GENERAL FUND CALTRONICS BUSINESS KONICA COPIES FY 24 236.59 01 - GENERAL FUND CALTRONICS BUSINESS KONICA COPIES FY 24 261.54 01 - GENERAL FUND CALTRONICS BUSINESS KONICA COPIES FY 24 298.04 01 - GENERAL FUND CALTRONICS BUSINESS KONICA COPIES FY 24 301.89 01 - GENERAL FUND CALTRONICS BUSINESS KONICA COPIES FY 24 325.38 01 - GENERAL FUND CALTRONICS BUSINESS KONICA COPIES FY 24 432.30 CALTRONICS BUSINESS Total 2,744.00
01 - GENERAL FUND CATACUTAN CONSULTIN INTERIM ADMIN DIR S 28,919.14 CATACUTAN CONSULTIN Total 28,919.14
01 - GENERAL FUND CENGAGE LEARNING/GA BOOKS & MATERIALS 55.06 01 - GENERAL FUND CENGAGE LEARNING/GA BOOKS & MATERIALS 27.09 01 - GENERAL FUND CENGAGE LEARNING/GA BOOKS & MATERIALS 265.61 01 - GENERAL FUND CENGAGE LEARNING/GA BOOKS & MATERIALS 24.46 01 - GENERAL FUND CENGAGE LEARNING/GA BOOKS & MATERIALS 30.58 CENGAGE LEARNING/GA Total 402.80
01 - GENERAL FUND CENTRALSQUARE TECHN FINANCE SOFTWARE JU 4,962.96 01 - GENERAL FUND CENTRALSQUARE TECHN FINANCE SOFTWARE SE 4,962.96 CENTRALSQUARE TECHN Total 9,925.92
01 - GENERAL FUND CHEVROLET OF WATSON PD UNIT 19 389.17 CHEVROLET OF WATSON Total 389.17
01 - GENERAL FUND CHILLA P. KARTALOV RFND PERMIT FEES 514.00 CHILLA P. KARTALOV Total 514.00
01 - GENERAL FUND CHOMP HOSP SVC #402123023
PGCC 10-16-24

27.00

Page 40 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
CHOMP Total 27.00
01 - GENERAL FUND CITY MANAGEMENT ADV ADM SVCS DIRECTOR S 9,000.00 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY MANAGEMENT ADV ADM SVCS DIRECTOR S 9,000.00 CITY MANAGEMENT ADV Total 18,000.00
01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF MONTEREY FY25 FIRE SERVICE J 272,759.00 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF MONTEREY FY25 FIRE SERVICE A 272,759.00 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF MONTEREY FY25 FIRE SVCS SEPT 272,759.00 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF MONTEREY CPG CONTRIB MB DEFE 5,000.00 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF MONTEREY FY25 FIRE SERVICES 272,759.00 CITY OF MONTEREY Total 1,096,036.00
01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:3301 AFLAC MED 1,909.52 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:1006 WORK COMP 62.10 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:1009 WORK COMP 164.74 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:1010 WORK COMP 3,269.93 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:1005 WORK COMP 1,315.63 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:1003 WORK COMP 7,333.24 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:7510 PERS REIMB 29.42 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:2101 DENTAL 284.25 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:201 DENTAL 112.77 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:200 DENTAL 473.75 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:2102 DENTAL 498.49 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:2103 DENTAL FAM 805.97 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:0005 SUTA 140.01 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:3301 AFLAC MED 1,909.52 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:1006 WORK COMP 63.93 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:1009 WORK COMP 181.77 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:1005 WORK COMP 1,380.05 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:1010 WORK COMP 3,303.69 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:1003 WORK COMP 6,398.06 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:7510 PERS REIMB 29.42 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:201 DENTAL 112.77 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:2101 DENTAL 303.20 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:2102 DENTAL 460.90 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:200 DENTAL 549.55 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:2103 DENTAL FAM 805.97 01 - GENERAL FUND CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:0005 SUTA 137.01 CITY OF PACIFIC GRO Total 32,035.66
01 - GENERAL FUND CLARITY SEMINARS EE TRAINING SEMINAR 2,800.00 CLARITY SEMINARS Total 2,800.00
01 - GENERAL FUND COMCAST PW INTERNET 0194117 238.76
01 - GENERAL FUND COMCAST REC INTERNET 021497 107.02
01 - GENERAL FUND COMCAST PW INTERNET 0389527 106.23
01 - GENERAL FUND COMCAST PW INTERNET 0387836 155.98
COMCAST Total 607.99
01 - GENERAL FUND COMPLETE PAPERLESS LASERFICHE SOFTWARE 30,037.50 COMPLETE PAPERLESS Total 30,037.50
01 - GENERAL FUND CORINNE WITMER RFND CLASS CHANGE 16.00 CORINNE WITMER Total 16.00
01 - GENERAL FUND CPCA CPCA DUES 462.00
CPCA Total 462.00
01 - GENERAL FUND CPS HR CONSULTING RECRUIT TESTNG SVCS PGCC 10-16-24
1,886.50

Page 41 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
CPS HR CONSULTING Total 1,886.50
01 - GENERAL FUND CREEKSIDE CENTER FO FY25 MONARCH HABITA 6,000.00 CREEKSIDE CENTER FO Total 6,000.00
01 - GENERAL FUND CRYSTAL ISLAS RFND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 206.00 CRYSTAL ISLAS Total 206.00
01 - GENERAL FUND DIANNE LYLE PMT FOR DANCE CLASS 88.20 DIANNE LYLE Total 88.20
01 - GENERAL FUND DIEGO CANDELARIO DMV CLASS B LICENSE 98.00 DIEGO CANDELARIO Total 98.00
01 - GENERAL FUND DOCTORS ON DUTY MED DMV PHYSICALS 900.00 01 - GENERAL FUND DOCTORS ON DUTY MED DMV PHYSCIAL 150.00 DOCTORS ON DUTY MED Total 1,050.00
01 - GENERAL FUND EDGES ELECTRICAL GR LED LIGHT 115.82
01 - GENERAL FUND EDGES ELECTRICAL GR ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 6.51 01 - GENERAL FUND EDGES ELECTRICAL GR ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 28.28 EDGES ELECTRICAL GR Total 150.61
01 - GENERAL FUND EFT DED:*FM MEDICARE 11,801.00
01 - GENERAL FUND EFT DED:*SCA STATE TAX 17,805.35
01 - GENERAL FUND EFT DED:*FT FEDERAL TX 44,669.07
01 - GENERAL FUND EFT DED:*FM MEDICARE 6.82
01 - GENERAL FUND EFT DED:*FM MEDICARE 11,467.26
01 - GENERAL FUND EFT DED:*SCA STATE TAX 16,547.92
01 - GENERAL FUND EFT DED:*FT FEDERAL TX 39,791.38
EFT Total 142,088.80
01 - GENERAL FUND ENGINEERED FIRE SYS AUGUST PLAN REVIEW 687.50 ENGINEERED FIRE SYS Total 687.50
01 - GENERAL FUND ERIC BOUSTANI RFND PERMIT FEES 520.80 ERIC BOUSTANI Total 520.80
01 - GENERAL FUND ERIC HEIM DMV CLASS B LICENSE 100.06
ERIC HEIM Total 100.06
01 - GENERAL FUND ERIC TRAILER RFND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 206.00 ERIC TRAILER Total 206.00
01 - GENERAL FUND EWING IRRIGATION PR CHAUTAUQUA HALL 252.28 EWING IRRIGATION PR Total 252.28
01 - GENERAL FUND FOREST HILL ACE HAR REC DEPT SUPPLIES 48.03 01 - GENERAL FUND FOREST HILL ACE HAR B&G SUPPLIES 98.28 FOREST HILL ACE HAR Total 146.31
01 - GENERAL FUND FOSTER & FOSTER, IN GASBS 68 CALPERS 2,100.00 FOSTER & FOSTER, IN Total 2,100.00
01 - GENERAL FUND GACHINA LANDSCAPE M FY25 PARK MOWING JU 1,339.00 01 - GENERAL FUND GACHINA LANDSCAPE M FY25 PARK MOWING AU 1,339.00 01 - GENERAL FUND GACHINA LANDSCAPE M FY25 PARK MOWING SE 1,339.00 GACHINA LANDSCAPE M Total 4,017.00
01 - GENERAL FUND GARDAWORLD SEPT SERVICES 90.84
01 - GENERAL FUND GARDAWORLD AUGUST EXCESS 29.26
GARDAWORLD Total 120.10
01 - GENERAL FUND GERI GOODELL FACADE IMPRVMT PRGM 5,000.00 GERI GOODELL Total 5,000.00
01 - GENERAL FUND GLYNIS BARRETT RFND ON ACCOUNT 35.00
GLYNIS BARRETT Total 35.00
01 - GENERAL FUND GRANITE CONSTRUCTIO ASPHALT
PGCC 10-16-24
571.38

Page 42 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
GRANITE CONSTRUCTIO Total 571.38
01 - GENERAL FUND GRANITE ROCK COMPAN BASE ROCK 962.21
GRANITE ROCK COMPAN Total 962.21
01 - GENERAL FUND GRETA VARGOVA RFND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 206.00 GRETA VARGOVA Total 206.00
01 - GENERAL FUND HANA GARDENS SEASID MULCH 190.97
HANA GARDENS SEASID Total 190.97
01 - GENERAL FUND HARRIS & ASSOCIATES CONTRACT PLANNING S 11,978.75 01 - GENERAL FUND HARRIS & ASSOCIATES CONTRACT PLANNING S 16,835.00 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES Total 28,813.75
01 - GENERAL FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP SEA PALM FENCE REPA 283.21 01 - GENERAL FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP SEA PALM FENCE REPA 119.15 01 - GENERAL FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP SEA PALM FENCE REPA 133.79 01 - GENERAL FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP MEMORIAL BENCHES 150.36 01 - GENERAL FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP MEMORIAL BENCHES 167.06 01 - GENERAL FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP STREETS SUPPLIES 113.69 01 - GENERAL FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP SEA PALM FENCE REPA 8.15 01 - GENERAL FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP CREDIT B&G SUPPLIES (283.21) 01 - GENERAL FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP MUNI PACK 48.76
01 - GENERAL FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP DOOR AT REC CTR 37.58 01 - GENERAL FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP WELL REPAIRS 76.79 01 - GENERAL FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP DOOR AT REC CTR 96.76 01 - GENERAL FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP WHALE REPAIRS 22.84 01 - GENERAL FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP MUNI PACK 29.07
HAYWARD LUMBER COMP Total 1,004.00
01 - GENERAL FUND HEIHACHIRO TAKARABE PMT FOR TAI CHI CLA 112.00 01 - GENERAL FUND HEIHACHIRO TAKARABE PMT FOR TAI CHI CLA 112.00 HEIHACHIRO TAKARABE Total 224.00
01 - GENERAL FUND HOME DEPOT CREDIT S FINANCE CHARGES 11.93 01 - GENERAL FUND HOME DEPOT CREDIT S BATTERY LEAF BLOWER 293.88 HOME DEPOT CREDIT S Total 305.81
01 - GENERAL FUND HOMETEK MEMORIAL BENCHES 165.00
01 - GENERAL FUND HOMETEK MEMRY BNCH INSCRIPT 165.00
HOMETEK Total 330.00
01 - GENERAL FUND IMPERIAL COUNTY OFF MRC Q4 APRIL - JUNE 1,677.63 IMPERIAL COUNTY OFF Total 1,677.63
01 - GENERAL FUND JEANNIE TRABACK RFND CANCELLED CLAS 60.00 JEANNIE TRABACK Total 60.00
01 - GENERAL FUND JENNIFER LANGFORD PW SUPPLIES 15.02
JENNIFER LANGFORD Total 15.02
01 - GENERAL FUND JENNY JACOX RFND CANCELLED CLAS 25.00 JENNY JACOX Total 25.00
01 - GENERAL FUND JOHN TERNIIEDEN RFND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 206.00 JOHN TERNIIEDEN Total 206.00
01 - GENERAL FUND KAREN CABRERA RFND PARENT REQUEST 75.00 KAREN CABRERA Total 75.00
01 - GENERAL FUND KATHY PRASKE RFND DAMGE DEPOSIT 206.00 KATHY PRASKE Total 206.00
01 - GENERAL FUND KIMBALL MIDWEST MECH STOCK 277.04
01 - GENERAL FUND KIMBALL MIDWEST MECH STOCK 202.22
01 - GENERAL FUND KIMBALL MIDWEST B&G TOOL
PGCC 10-16-24

21.85

Page 43 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
01 - GENERAL FUND KIMBALL MIDWEST CREDIT STREET RETUR (368.65) 01 - GENERAL FUND KIMBALL MIDWEST B&G STOCK 38.70
01 - GENERAL FUND KIMBALL MIDWEST STOCK STREET MAINT 68.59 01 - GENERAL FUND KIMBALL MIDWEST CREDIT STREET STOCK (15.51) 01 - GENERAL FUND KIMBALL MIDWEST MECH STOCK 162.78
01 - GENERAL FUND KIMBALL MIDWEST MECH STOCK 133.46
KIMBALL MIDWEST Total 520.48
01 - GENERAL FUND KNOWBE4, INC KNOWBE4 RENEWAL FOR 4,309.50 KNOWBE4, INC Total 4,309.50
01 - GENERAL FUND LANGUAGE LINE SERVI LANGUAGE SERVICES 46.87 LANGUAGE LINE SERVI Total 46.87
01 - GENERAL FUND LAS ANIMAS MARINA CONCRETE PICO CRKR 1,220.75 01 - GENERAL FUND LAS ANIMAS MARINA CONCRETE CROCKER 710.30 LAS ANIMAS MARINA Total 1,931.05
01 - GENERAL FUND LEGAL SHIELD DED:6100 LEGAL SVC 31.75 LEGAL SHIELD Total 31.75
01 - GENERAL FUND LEXIPOL LLC POLICE ONE ACADEMY 3,770.60 01 - GENERAL FUND LEXIPOL LLC POLICY & DTBS ANNUA 3,577.07 LEXIPOL LLC Total 7,347.67
01 - GENERAL FUND MANUELA VASQUEZ-SIL POST STORAGE REVERS 238.00 MANUELA VASQUEZ-SIL Total 238.00
01 - GENERAL FUND MASS MUTUAL (457 PL DED:3999 ROTH IRA 1,755.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MASS MUTUAL (457 PL DED:4000 DEF COMP 13,840.16 01 - GENERAL FUND MASS MUTUAL (457 PL DED:3999 ROTH IRA 1,755.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MASS MUTUAL (457 PL DED:4000 DEF COMP 12,958.36 MASS MUTUAL (457 PL Total 30,308.52
01 - GENERAL FUND MAYA TICE REIMB REC SUPPLIES 14.55
01 - GENERAL FUND MAYA TICE REIMB POOL SUPPLIES 23.23
MAYA TICE Total 37.78
01 - GENERAL FUND MEGAN MCKENNA RFND CANCELLED CLAS 25.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MEGAN MCKENNA RFND CANCEL CLASS 12.00 MEGAN MCKENNA Total 37.00
01 - GENERAL FUND MICHELLE PRINGLE RFND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 206.00 MICHELLE PRINGLE Total 206.00
01 - GENERAL FUND MIDWEST TAPE BOOKS & MATERIALS 203.17 01 - GENERAL FUND MIDWEST TAPE BOOKS & MATERIALS 93.94
01 - GENERAL FUND MIDWEST TAPE BOOKS & MATERIALS 124.52 MIDWEST TAPE Total 421.63
01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION LINEN SUPPL FD LINEN CLEANING F 89.98 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION LINEN SUPPL FD LINEN CLEANING F 89.98 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION LINEN SUPPL FD LINEN CLEANING F 103.48 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION LINEN SUPPL FD LINEN CLEANING F 89.98 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION LINEN SUPPL FD LINEN CLEANING F 89.98 MISSION LINEN SUPPL Total 463.40
01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 60.65 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 60.65 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 108.22 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 108.22 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.34 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.34 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE PGCC 10-16-24

19.34

Page 44 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.12 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.12 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.12 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 11.58 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 11.58 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 11.58 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.33 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.33 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.34 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.33 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 60.65 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.33 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.33 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.34 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.34 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.34 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.34 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.34 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.34 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 108.22 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.12 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.12 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.12 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.12 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.12 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.12 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.12 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.12 01 - GENERAL FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.12 MISSION UNIFORM SER Total 1,852.84
01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY PEST C FY25 PEST CONTROL S 135.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY PEST C FY25 PEST CONTROL S 135.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY PEST C FY25 PEST CONTROL S 135.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY PEST C FY25 PEST CONTROL S 135.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY PEST C FY25 PEST CONTROL S 175.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY PEST C FY25 PEST CONTROL S 175.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY PEST C FY25 PEST CONTROL S 175.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY PEST C FY25 PEST CONTROL S 180.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY PEST C FY25 PEST CONTROL S 180.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY PEST C FY25 PEST CONTROL S 490.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY PEST C FY25 PEST CONTROL S 490.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY PEST C FY25 PEST CONTROL S 135.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY PEST C FY25 PEST CONTROL S 175.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY PEST C FY25 PEST CONTROL S 180.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY PEST C FY25 PEST CONTROL S 490.00 MONTEREY BAY PEST C Total 3,385.00
01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY TREEWO ARBORIST SERVICES F 1,200.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY TREEWO ARBORIST SERVICES F 1,600.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY TREEWO ARBORIST SERVICES F 2,300.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY BAY TREEWO ARBORIST SERVICES F 3,300.00 MONTEREY BAY TREEWO Total
PGCC 10-16-24
8,400.00

Page 45 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY COUNTY WEE SALARY CLASS ORD 130.50 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY COUNTY WEE NOTICE PUBLIC HEARI 261.00 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY COUNTY WEE PH HIST RESOURCES 304.50 MONTEREY COUNTY WEE Total 696.00
01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY TIRE SERVI REPAIRS PD UNIT 1 577.20 01 - GENERAL FUND MONTEREY TIRE SERVI PD UNIT 1 957.59
MONTEREY TIRE SERVI Total 1,534.79
01 - GENERAL FUND MPRSRU MPSRU CONTRIBUTIONS 5,000.00
MPRSRU Total 5,000.00
01 - GENERAL FUND MTRY COUNTY DEPT OF DED:0023 GARNISH 396.92 01 - GENERAL FUND MTRY COUNTY DEPT OF DED:0023 GARNISH 396.92 MTRY COUNTY DEPT OF Total 793.84
01 - GENERAL FUND MURRAY MOBILE LIVES LIVESCAN - VOLUNTEE 155.00 MURRAY MOBILE LIVES Total 155.00
01 - GENERAL FUND NAPIER OVERHEAD DOO PG CEMETERY DOOR FI 4,940.00 NAPIER OVERHEAD DOO Total 4,940.00
01 - GENERAL FUND NIELSEN MERKSAMER LEGAL SERVICES 4,608.00 NIELSEN MERKSAMER Total 4,608.00
01 - GENERAL FUND NUTRIEN AG SOLUTION SQUIRREL BAIT 112.38 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTION Total 112.38
01 - GENERAL FUND ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI CDD OFFICE SUPPLIES 95.39 01 - GENERAL FUND ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI CDD OFFICE SUPPLIES 71.78 01 - GENERAL FUND ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLI 486.52 01 - GENERAL FUND ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI CDD OFFICE SUPPLIES 294.30 01 - GENERAL FUND ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI FIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 333.74 01 - GENERAL FUND ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI CEM OFFICE SUPPLIES 6.70 01 - GENERAL FUND ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI FIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 166.54 01 - GENERAL FUND ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI CDD OFFICE SUPPLIES 35.58 01 - GENERAL FUND ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI CDD OFFICE SUPPLIES 52.53 01 - GENERAL FUND ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLI 72.19 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI Total 1,615.27
01 - GENERAL FUND O'REILLY AUTO ENTER REPAIR PD UNIT 2 579.90 01 - GENERAL FUND O'REILLY AUTO ENTER REPAIR B&G UNIT 50 73.37 01 - GENERAL FUND O'REILLY AUTO ENTER PD REPAIR UNIT 5 8.73 01 - GENERAL FUND O'REILLY AUTO ENTER REPAIR B&G UNIT 50 15.56 01 - GENERAL FUND O'REILLY AUTO ENTER REAPAIR B&G UNIT 53 16.49 01 - GENERAL FUND O'REILLY AUTO ENTER REPAIR CEM UNIT 71D 76.42 01 - GENERAL FUND O'REILLY AUTO ENTER B&G UNIT 50 REPAIRS 79.13 01 - GENERAL FUND O'REILLY AUTO ENTER B&G UNIT 58 REPAIRS 15.76 01 - GENERAL FUND O'REILLY AUTO ENTER CDD EU-1 REPAIRS 82.49 01 - GENERAL FUND O'REILLY AUTO ENTER B&G UNIT 50 REPAIRS 130.05 01 - GENERAL FUND O'REILLY AUTO ENTER SEWER UNIT 44 REPAI 28.39 01 - GENERAL FUND O'REILLY AUTO ENTER B&G UNIT 50 REPAIRS 212.78 O'REILLY AUTO ENTER Total 1,319.07
01 - GENERAL FUND OVERDRIVE, INC. BOOKS & MATERIALS 11.96 OVERDRIVE, INC. Total 11.96
01 - GENERAL FUND OVERHEAD DOOR OF SA DOOR REPAIR PW 386.31 01 - GENERAL FUND OVERHEAD DOOR OF SA FIX DOOR FD 440.61 OVERHEAD DOOR OF SA Total 826.92
01 - GENERAL FUND P.F. PETTIBONE & CO RESOLUTION BINDER 168.95 P.F. PETTIBONE & CO Total
PGCC 10-16-24
168.95

Page 46 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PW ADMIN 5508-4 1,527.79 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT GOLF STREET 3438-9 52.06 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT REC 0956-9 4,737.94 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 117 RECREATION ROOM 3.79 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT LOVERS POINT 4.75 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 1307 FORST SINEX SI 61.62 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT FIRE DEPT 24% 418.15 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 580 PINE AVE - LOAN 1,046.81 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT CONCESSION STAND 63.78 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 1307 FORST PINE SIG 65.32 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 165 FOREST AVE 77.95 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PUBLIC LIBRARY 90.60 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT CITY COUNCIL - 3% 94.77 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT RECREATION - 3% 94.77 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 162 16TH STREET 98.28 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT CHAUTAUQUA HALL 98.82 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 17TH ST & LAUREL 100.88 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 117 COMMUNITY CTR 112.59 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 17 MI DR BALLPARK 115.03 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT FINANCE - 7% 121.96 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 300 FOREST AVE 159.48 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT CEDD - 9.5% 165.52 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT CITY MANAGER - 9.5% 165.52 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT FIRE DEPT 211.89
01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT FINANCE - 7% 221.13 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT CHAUTAUQUA HALL 222.46 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT FOREST 40 FT E/O LH 228.53 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 117 COMMUNITY CTR 273.99 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 117 COMMUNITY CTR 283.30 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT POLICE DEPT 291.41 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT CEDD - 9.5% 300.10 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT CITY MANAGER - 9.5% 300.10 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 17TH ST & LAUREL 546.18 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT FOREST & CENTRAL DR 550.66 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT FOREST 40 FT E/O LH 564.45 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 550 CENTRAL AVE 661.47 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT POLICE DEPT 43% 749.19 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT FIRE DEPT 24% 758.14 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT FOREST & CENTRAL DR 1,220.77 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT POLICE DEPT 43% 1,358.35 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 620 OCEAN VIEW POOL 1,497.58 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PUBLIC LIBRARY 1,541.88 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT CALEDONIA ST 0.03 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 17 MI DR BALLPARK 0.11 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT FOREST CENTRL SPR 0.31 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 168 16TH ST 0.46
01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PLATT PK SPRNKLR 7.08 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 117 RECREATION ROOM 18.73 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT CORP YARD SUNSET DR 18.86 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PARKING LOT LIGHT 15.77 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT CORP YARD DM & 5TH PGCC 10-16-24

15.87

Page 47 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT GRAND AV & PK PL 22.30 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT LOVERS POINT 22.66 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PIEDMONT MORELAND 24.72 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 1307 FORST SINEX SI 26.44 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 1307 FORST PINE SIG 28.57 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT BEACH BOAT STORAGE 30.90 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PLATT PK SPRNKLR 27.69 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT COR MELROSE 44.48 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PHONE BOOTH-BERWICK 45.55 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 300 16TH ST. 48.83 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 17 MILE DRIVE 51.68 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT CITY COUNCIL - 3% 52.27 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT RECREATION - 3% 52.27 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 17 MI DR BALLPARK 8.11 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 101 CITY HALL/FIN 8.60 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 101 CITY HALL/CEDD 8.60 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT OCEANVIEW & 17TH 9.92 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT CALEDONIA PK LIGHTS 10.56 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT FOREST CENTRL SPR 10.99 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 17 MI DR BALLPARK 11.28 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 168 16TH ST 12.14 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT BERWICK PARK AT 14.68 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT COR MELROSE 15.39 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT REC 4030-4 402.45 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PW ADMIN 5508-4 1,213.46 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT Total 23,541.52
01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GROVE CITY DED:7000 ASSOC DUES 840.00 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GROVE CITY DED:7000 ASSOC DUES 840.00 PACIFIC GROVE CITY Total 1,680.00
01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GROVE GOLF PMT FOR JR GOLF CAM 501.20 PACIFIC GROVE GOLF Total 501.20
01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GROVE HARDW B&G SUPPLIES 1,472.74 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GROVE HARDW STREETS SUPPLIES 481.15 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GROVE HARDW MECH SUPPLIES 195.12 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GROVE HARDW KEYS SUPPLIES 6.53 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GROVE HARDW KEY SUPPLIES 15.28 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GROVE HARDW POOL SUPPLIES 11.10 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GROVE HARDW LIBRARY SUPPLIES 44.06 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GROVE HARDW MUSEUM SUPPLIES 46.93 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GROVE HARDW POLICE B&G SUPPLIES 114.26 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GROVE HARDW OFFICE SUPPLIES 17.55 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW Total 2,404.72
01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GROVE LIBRA PMT LOST LIBRARY BO 9.29 PACIFIC GROVE LIBRA Total 9.29
01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GROVE MANAG DED:7203 ASSOC DUES 50.00 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC GROVE MANAG DED:7203 ASSOC DUES 50.00 PACIFIC GROVE MANAG Total 100.00
01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC LIBRARY PAR PLP MEMBERSHIP FEES 8,641.00 PACIFIC LIBRARY PAR Total 8,641.00
01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC PRODUCTS & PAINT FOR STREETS 4,315.38 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC PRODUCTS & PAINT
PGCC 10-16-24
713.72

Page 48 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
PACIFIC PRODUCTS & Total 5,029.10
01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC WEST WATER ADMIN WATER SYSTEM 42.85 01 - GENERAL FUND PACIFIC WEST WATER CDD WATER SYSTEM 42.85 PACIFIC WEST WATER Total 85.70
01 - GENERAL FUND PATRICIA MACASPAC RFND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 206.00 PATRICIA MACASPAC Total 206.00
01 - GENERAL FUND PEDRO DELGADILLO RFND PERMIT FEES 520.80 PEDRO DELGADILLO Total 520.80
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0022 PERS SP MS 159.61
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0016 PERS-RETRO 134.57
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:08 PERS OTHER 353.45
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0019 PERS RT SF 58.91
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0004 SURV BEN 90.21
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0025 PERS RT MS 104.35
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0009 PERS OTHER 817.13
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0018 PERS SP SF 1,025.35
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0000 PERS 5,187.22
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:07 PERS CITY 6,012.06
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0002 PERS 3,189.83
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0021 PERS REG M 13,130.88
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0020 PERS ER M3 13,602.32
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0006 PERS CITY 8,393.48
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:01 PERS 9,240.27
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0017 PERS RG SF 9,321.11
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0011 PERS ER SF 10,412.91
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0019 PERS RT SF (58.91)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0004 SURV BEN (90.21)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0025 PERS RT MS (104.35)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0016 PERS-RETRO (134.57)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0022 PERS SP MS (159.61)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:08 PERS OTHER (353.45)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0009 PERS OTHER (817.13)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0018 PERS SP SF (1,025.35)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0002 PERS (3,189.83)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0000 PERS (5,187.22)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:07 PERS CITY (6,012.06)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0006 PERS CITY (8,393.48)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:01 PERS (9,240.27)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0017 PERS RG SF (9,321.11)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0011 PERS ER SF (10,412.91)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0021 PERS REG M (13,130.88)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0020 PERS ER M3 (13,602.32)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0025 PERS RT MS 4.63
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0009 PERS OTHER 672.89
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:08 PERS OTHER 417.57
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0022 PERS SP MS 324.98
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0004 SURV BEN 90.21
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:07 PERS CITY 6,614.13
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0006 PERS CITY 7,828.42
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0017 PERS RG SF 9,068.26
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0011 PERS ER SF
PGCC 10-16-24
10,014.73

Page 49 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:01 PERS 10,136.91
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0000 PERS 4,805.89
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0018 PERS SP SF 939.20
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0002 PERS 3,189.83
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0021 PERS REG M 13,061.60
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0020 PERS ER M3 13,598.62
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0025 PERS RT MS (4.63)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0004 SURV BEN (90.21)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0022 PERS SP MS (324.98)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:08 PERS OTHER (417.57)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0009 PERS OTHER (672.89)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0018 PERS SP SF (939.20)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0002 PERS (3,189.83)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0000 PERS (4,805.89)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:07 PERS CITY (6,614.13)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0006 PERS CITY (7,828.42)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0017 PERS RG SF (9,068.26)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0011 PERS ER SF (10,014.73)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:01 PERS (10,136.91)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0021 PERS REG M (13,061.60)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS DED:0020 PERS ER M3 (13,598.62)
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 4,083.33
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 4,333.33
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 6,416.67
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 8,416.67
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 10,750.00
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 250.00
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 500.00
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 1,333.33
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 12,500.00
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 13,583.33
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 13,916.67
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 14,833.33
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 16,833.33
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 107,666.67
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 135,596.92
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS PPE 8.17.24 SUPPLEM 3,388.40
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS PPE 8.17.24 SUPPLEM 62,292.43
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS PPE 6/22/24 SUPPLEM 583.24
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS 17681665 200.00
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS 17661967 200.00
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS 17663660 1,000.00
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS PPE 7.20.24 74,961.99
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS PERS 8.3.24 75,188.88
01 - GENERAL FUND PERS PPE 9.14.24 80,676.77
PERS Total 649,505.29
01 - GENERAL FUND POINT PINOS GRILL CPG MGR'S MTG 8/23/ 533.58 01 - GENERAL FUND POINT PINOS GRILL CPG MGR'S MTG 8/23/ (533.58) POINT PINOS GRILL Total -
01 - GENERAL FUND POLICE OFFICERS ASS DED:7205 ASSOC DUES 884.41 01 - GENERAL FUND POLICE OFFICERS ASS DED:7204 ASSOC DUES PGCC 10-16-24

8.00

Page 50 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
01 - GENERAL FUND POLICE OFFICERS ASS DED:7205 ASSOC DUES 841.50 POLICE OFFICERS ASS Total 1,733.91
01 - GENERAL FUND PURE WATER PW WATER SERVICE 25.80
01 - GENERAL FUND PURE WATER MECH WATER SERVICE 25.80
01 - GENERAL FUND PURE WATER B&G WATER SERVICE 25.80
01 - GENERAL FUND PURE WATER STREET WATER SVC 25.80
PURE WATER Total 103.20
01 - GENERAL FUND QUADIENT FINANCE US POSTAGE 1,050.00
QUADIENT FINANCE US Total 1,050.00
01 - GENERAL FUND R & S HEATING AND S LIBRARY EXHAUST FAN 3,292.75 01 - GENERAL FUND R & S HEATING AND S LIBRARY VENT REPAIR 481.78 R & S HEATING AND S Total 3,774.53
01 - GENERAL FUND RACHEL SHEKELL RFND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 206.00 RACHEL SHEKELL Total 206.00
01 - GENERAL FUND RAZZOLINK INC. WEB HOSTING 19.99
01 - GENERAL FUND RAZZOLINK INC. WEB HOSTING 19.99
01 - GENERAL FUND RAZZOLINK INC. WEB HOSTING 19.99
RAZZOLINK INC. Total 59.97
01 - GENERAL FUND READY REFRESH WATER SERVICES 26.49
READY REFRESH Total 26.49
01 - GENERAL FUND REBECCA POZZI RFND REQUEST 99.00
REBECCA POZZI Total 99.00
01 - GENERAL FUND REPUBLIC ELEVATOR, ELEVATOR INSPECTION 2,118.27 REPUBLIC ELEVATOR, Total 2,118.27
01 - GENERAL FUND ROOTER KING RFND PERMIT FEES 154.00
ROOTER KING Total 154.00
01 - GENERAL FUND ROUKYA FILMS RFND PD PERMIT FEES 2,330.50 ROUKYA FILMS Total 2,330.50
01 - GENERAL FUND ROXANE J VIRAY RETRMT BENEFITS SEP 150.00 ROXANE J VIRAY Total 150.00
01 - GENERAL FUND SALINAS VALLEY PROS UNIFORMS 525.72
01 - GENERAL FUND SALINAS VALLEY PROS UNIFORMS 577.06
SALINAS VALLEY PROS Total 1,102.78
01 - GENERAL FUND SANDRA KANDELL MILEAGE FOR FILINGS 31.29 SANDRA KANDELL Total 31.29
01 - GENERAL FUND SENTRY ALARM SYSTEM LIBRARY ALARM FIX 270.33 01 - GENERAL FUND SENTRY ALARM SYSTEM GOLF COURSE ALARM F 317.74 01 - GENERAL FUND SENTRY ALARM SYSTEM LIBRARY ALARM SVC 1,068.99 01 - GENERAL FUND SENTRY ALARM SYSTEM FIRE DEPT ALARM 250.00 SENTRY ALARM SYSTEM Total 1,907.06
01 - GENERAL FUND SIR SPEEDY LIBRARY BUS CARDS 172.73
SIR SPEEDY Total 172.73
01 - GENERAL FUND STANDARD INSURANCE DED:3500 LIFE INS 1,464.75 STANDARD INSURANCE Total 1,464.75
01 - GENERAL FUND STAPHANY ARRIOLA HR EMPLOYEE ENGAGMT 36.69 STAPHANY ARRIOLA Total 36.69
01 - GENERAL FUND STATE DISABILITY TA DED:0026 SDI 4,163.63 01 - GENERAL FUND STATE DISABILITY TA DED:0026 SDI 3,919.47 STATE DISABILITY TA Total 8,083.10
01 - GENERAL FUND TASHA STEVENS RFND PARENT REQ 34.50
TASHA STEVENS Total
PGCC 10-16-24

34.50

Page 51 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
01 - GENERAL FUND TIMOTHY D BOWEN CNTRCTR PMT FOR CAM 2,952.60 TIMOTHY D BOWEN Total 2,952.60
01 - GENERAL FUND TOM'S SITE SERVICES TOILET / HAND WASHI 3,935.58 TOM'S SITE SERVICES Total 3,935.58
01 - GENERAL FUND TRACNET CORPORATION RMS MEMBERSHIP MAIN 9,500.00 01 - GENERAL FUND TRACNET CORPORATION PD RMS MAINTENANCE 3,468.00 TRACNET CORPORATION Total 12,968.00
01 - GENERAL FUND TRANSAMERICA EMPLOY DED:5202 TRANSAMERI 384.68 01 - GENERAL FUND TRANSAMERICA EMPLOY DED:5202 TRANSAMERI 384.68 TRANSAMERICA EMPLOY Total 769.36
01 - GENERAL FUND TRANSUNION RISK AND TLO POLICE DEPT 108.60 01 - GENERAL FUND TRANSUNION RISK AND TLO 75.00
TRANSUNION RISK AND Total 183.60
01 - GENERAL FUND UNION BANK OF CALIF DED:4005 PARS-457 825.44 01 - GENERAL FUND UNION BANK OF CALIF DED:4005 PARS-457 969.02 UNION BANK OF CALIF Total 1,794.46
01 - GENERAL FUND UNITED WAY MONTEREY FY 24/25 SUBSCRIPTI 5,000.00 UNITED WAY MONTEREY Total 5,000.00
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK LATE FEE 13.32
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK L LIVIAN TRAING TRV 213.34
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK M KHASIMI WEBHOSTIN 41.98
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK M KHASIMI SOFTWARE 148.20
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK S KANDELL POSTAGE 30.45
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK S ARRIOLA OVERNIGHT 30.45
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK S ARRIOLA LUNCHEON 42.01
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK L LIVIAN EMPLY ENGM 157.80
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK D GHO PWA SUBSCRIPT 26.00
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK S ARRIOLA MAILCHIMP 57.75
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK M KHASIMI SUPPLIES 191.20
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK D GHO PWA SUPPLIES 45.95
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK S HOFFMAN UNIFORM 31.45
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK D GHO PWA MISC EXP 76.48
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK S HOFFMAN EMBROIDER 107.00
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK D GHO B&G MISC 132.50
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK D GHO SAFETY EQUIP 202.09
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK S ARRIOLA BIZ CARDS 27.31
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK S ARRIOLA BIZ CARDS 27.32
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK K VAUGHN OFF SUPPLI 43.47
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK C MADALONE CREDIT (1,172.48)
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK M MOGENSEN WATER 4.00
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK B ANDERSON NT OUT 1,076.70
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK C MADALONE PROMO 1,615.97
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK B ANDERSON LODGING 1,172.48
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK C MADALONE LODGING 1,172.48
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK M KHASIMI MISAC 1,750.00
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK S ARRIOLA CTY CNCL 373.58
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK S ARRIOLA RECRUIT A 400.00
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK L LIVIAN EMPLYMT AD 599.00
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK S ARRIOLA CMC CLASS 400.00
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK C MADALONE TRAINING 439.00
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK M MOGENSEN TRAVEL
PGCC 10-16-24
476.01

Page 52 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK PD TRAVEL TRAINING 970.35
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK M KHASIMI SUBSCRIPT 672.75
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK D DELFINO CAR WASH 260.00
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK M KHASIMI SUPPLIES 436.63
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK S HOFFMAN PRIME MBR 545.16
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK D GHO B&G VEHICLE 445.16
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK M KHASIMI SOFTWARE 914.51
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK K CLARK REC SUPPLIE 266.22
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK D GHO MECH STOCK 248.44
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK C COYLE BOOKS / MAT 249.07
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK C COYLE LIB SUPPLIE 418.46
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK K CLARK OFFICE SUPP 509.82
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK S HOFFMAN SUPPLIES 536.07
01 - GENERAL FUND US BANK D DELFINO EQUIPMT 562.58
US BANK Total 16,988.03
01 - GENERAL FUND VALLEY SAW & GARDEN COMMERCIAL CHAIN 29.49 01 - GENERAL FUND VALLEY SAW & GARDEN LANDSCAPING TOOLS 410.78 VALLEY SAW & GARDEN Total 440.27
01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON BUSINESS PORT ACCESS 2,598.22 01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON BUSINESS PORT ACCESS 500.12
VERIZON BUSINESS Total 3,098.34
01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS PW PHONE 1,097.18
01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS PW PHONE 10.02
01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS LIBRARY PHONE 76.02
01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS REC PHONE 37.50
01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS ADMIN PHONE 58.36
01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS FIRE DEPT PHONE 68.13 01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS ADMIN / IT PHONE 68.81 01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS CDD PHONE 97.91
01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS PD PHONE 103.72
01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS CITY MGR PHONE 142.61 01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS PW PHONES 10.02
01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS REC PHONES 37.54
01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS FD PHONES 63.32
01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS IT PHONES 68.81
01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS LIBRARY PHONES 76.02 01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS CDD PHONES 96.83
01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS PD PHONES 103.82
01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS CM PHONES 128.86
01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS IT / ADMIN PHONES 249.07 01 - GENERAL FUND VERIZON WIRELESS PW PHONES 529.64
VERIZON WIRELESS Total 3,124.19
01 - GENERAL FUND VESTIS SERVICES, LL LINEN SERVICES FY 2 175.33 01 - GENERAL FUND VESTIS SERVICES, LL LINEN SERVICES FY 2 175.33 01 - GENERAL FUND VESTIS SERVICES, LL LINEN SERVICES FY 2 175.33 01 - GENERAL FUND VESTIS SERVICES, LL LINEN SERVICES FY 2 175.33 01 - GENERAL FUND VESTIS SERVICES, LL LINEN SERVICES FY 2 175.33 01 - GENERAL FUND VESTIS SERVICES, LL LINEN SERVICES FY 2 175.33 01 - GENERAL FUND VESTIS SERVICES, LL LINEN SERVICES FY 2 175.33 01 - GENERAL FUND VESTIS SERVICES, LL LINEN SERVICES FY 2 175.33 01 - GENERAL FUND VESTIS SERVICES, LL LINEN SERVICES FY 2 PGCC 10-16-24
175.33

Page 53 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
01 - GENERAL FUND VESTIS SERVICES, LL LINEN SERVICES FY 2 175.33 01 - GENERAL FUND VESTIS SERVICES, LL LINEN SERVICES FY 2 175.33 VESTIS SERVICES, LL Total 1,928.63
01 - GENERAL FUND VISION SERVICE PLAN DED:2503 VISION FAM 390.00 01 - GENERAL FUND VISION SERVICE PLAN DED:300 VISION 174.50 01 - GENERAL FUND VISION SERVICE PLAN DED:301 VISION 45.00 01 - GENERAL FUND VISION SERVICE PLAN DED:2502 VISION 69.80 01 - GENERAL FUND VISION SERVICE PLAN DED:302 VISION 15.00 01 - GENERAL FUND VISION SERVICE PLAN DED:2503 VISION FAM 375.00 01 - GENERAL FUND VISION SERVICE PLAN DED:300 VISION 202.42 01 - GENERAL FUND VISION SERVICE PLAN DED:302 VISION 15.00 01 - GENERAL FUND VISION SERVICE PLAN DED:2502 VISION 76.78 01 - GENERAL FUND VISION SERVICE PLAN DED:301 VISION 45.00 VISION SERVICE PLAN Total 1,408.50
01 - GENERAL FUND WATSONVILLE FORD REPAIR PD UNIT 2 151.42 01 - GENERAL FUND WATSONVILLE FORD REPAIR PD UNIT 5 654.00 01 - GENERAL FUND WATSONVILLE FORD REPAIRS PD UNIT 1 409.43 01 - GENERAL FUND WATSONVILLE FORD MECH STOCK 285.13
01 - GENERAL FUND WATSONVILLE FORD MECH STOCK 214.89
WATSONVILLE FORD Total 1,714.87
01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 180.28 01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 180.28 01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 201.58 01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 201.58 01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 212.52 01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 212.52 01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 212.52 01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 212.52 01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 213.74 01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 213.74 01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 248.43 01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 248.43 01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 252.93 01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 289.05 01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 307.11 01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 307.11 01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 307.11 01 - GENERAL FUND WELLS FARGO VENDOR FY 24/25 KONICA LEA 343.24 WELLS FARGO VENDOR Total 4,344.69
01 - GENERAL FUND WEX BANK FUEL CARD 60.00
WEX BANK Total 60.00
01 - GENERAL FUND YAO QIAN RFND CANCELLED CLAS 25.00
01 - GENERAL FUND YAO QIAN RFND CANCEL CLASS 12.00
YAO QIAN Total 37.00
07 - LIBRARY BLDG & EQUIP FUND CARMEL PINE CONE LOCAL HISTORY DISPL 416.00 CARMEL PINE CONE Total 416.00
07 - LIBRARY BLDG & EQUIP FUND CHRISTINE LEONORA C REIMB FOR PHOTOGRPH 112.50 CHRISTINE LEONORA C Total 112.50
07 - LIBRARY BLDG & EQUIP FUND JERRY TAKIGAWA DESI LOCAL HISTORY 300.00 07 - LIBRARY BLDG & EQUIP FUND JERRY TAKIGAWA DESI LOCAL HISTORY 458.33 JERRY TAKIGAWA DESI Total
PGCC 10-16-24
758.33

Page 54 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
07 - LIBRARY BLDG & EQUIP FUND RUTH BOLDUAN LOCAL HISTORY 100.00 RUTH BOLDUAN Total 100.00
07 - LIBRARY BLDG & EQUIP FUND SLOWFIBER LOCAL HISTORY 100.00 SLOWFIBER Total 100.00
08 - MUSEUM IMPROVEMENT FUND COASTAL FABRICATION MUSEUM MEZZANINE RE 33,768.48 COASTAL FABRICATION Total 33,768.48
10 - HOSPITALITY IMPRVMT DIST. SEE MONTEREY MCTID JUL-SEPT 2024 40,375.00 SEE MONTEREY Total 40,375.00
15 - HOUSING FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 1,833.33
PERS Total 1,833.33
15 - HOUSING FUND US BANK A KROEGER LUNCH MTG 147.92
US BANK Total 147.92
18 - GAS TAX FUND BEAR ELECTRICAL SOL TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAIN 250.00 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOL Total 250.00
18 - GAS TAX FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN ST FUND 50% 340.49 18 - GAS TAX FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN ST FUND 50% 283.20 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN Total 623.69
18 - GAS TAX FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PW 4482-4 8,640.44 18 - GAS TAX FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT FOREST AV SUNSET AV 61.92 18 - GAS TAX FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT FOREST AVE SUNSET A 44.76 18 - GAS TAX FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT FOREST AV SUNSET AV 20.80 18 - GAS TAX FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT FOREST AVE SUNSET A 21.97 18 - GAS TAX FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 19TH & SUNSET DR. 0.28 18 - GAS TAX FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 19TH & SUNSET DR. 15.46 18 - GAS TAX FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PW 4482-4 8,765.78 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT Total 17,571.41
18 - GAS TAX FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 2,333.33
PERS Total 2,333.33
24 - STILLWELL CHILDREN'S POOL AMERICAN SUPPLY COM POOL CHLORINE 106.68 24 - STILLWELL CHILDREN'S POOL AMERICAN SUPPLY COM POOL CHLORINE 106.68 24 - STILLWELL CHILDREN'S POOL AMERICAN SUPPLY COM POOL CHLORINE 106.68 24 - STILLWELL CHILDREN'S POOL AMERICAN SUPPLY COM POOL CHLORINE 106.68 AMERICAN SUPPLY COM Total 426.72
27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. AT&T CALNET 3 LIGHTHSE PHONE 3247 31.18 27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. AT&T CALNET 3 LH PHONE 9391063247 30.42 AT&T CALNET 3 Total 61.60
27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. BELLA TERRA PUBLISH LIGHTHOUSE MERCH 207.91 BELLA TERRA PUBLISH Total 207.91
27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 90 ASILOMAR 206.67 27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 90 ASILOMAR 297.78 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN Total 504.45
27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. DEREK ZAUGG RFND DOUBLE CHARGED 17.51 DEREK ZAUGG Total 17.51
27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. ESCARRAGA'S LUXURY LIGHTHOUSE CLEANING 480.00 27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. ESCARRAGA'S LUXURY LIGHTHOUSE CLEANING 480.00 ESCARRAGA'S LUXURY Total 960.00
27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. FEDERICO'S EMBROIDE MERCHANDISE HATS 669.10 FEDERICO'S EMBROIDE Total 669.10
27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. HAPPY WOMAN JEWELRY LIGHTHOUSE MERCH 402.00 HAPPY WOMAN JEWELRY Total 402.00
27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. JENNIFER LANGFORD MAILING POSTAGE PGCC 10-16-24

10.40

Page 55 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
JENNIFER LANGFORD Total 10.40
27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. KEN HINSHAW LIGHTHOUSE MAINT 340.79 KEN HINSHAW Total 340.79
27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. LIFE AT SEA LIGHTHOUSE GIFT MER 1,473.75 LIFE AT SEA Total 1,473.75
27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. PACIFIC GAS & ELECT ASILOMAR BLVD PG LH 23.58 27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. PACIFIC GAS & ELECT ASILOMAR BLVD PG LH 5.37 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT Total 28.95
27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. PACIFIC GROVE HARDW LIGHTHOUSE SUPPLIES 185.62 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW Total 185.62
27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. US BANK D GHO LH MERCH 2,248.80 US BANK Total 2,248.80
40 - POETRY PROMOTION FUND ALEJANDRA LUCLI JIM POETRY PROMO 100.00 ALEJANDRA LUCLI JIM Total 100.00
40 - POETRY PROMOTION FUND AMAZON CAPITAL SERV POETRY PROMO 49.56 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV Total 49.56
40 - POETRY PROMOTION FUND CHRISTINE LEONORA C REIMB FOR PHOTO 112.50 CHRISTINE LEONORA C Total 112.50
40 - POETRY PROMOTION FUND JERRY TAKIGAWA DESI POETRY PROMOTION 300.00 40 - POETRY PROMOTION FUND JERRY TAKIGAWA DESI POETRY PROMO 458.33 JERRY TAKIGAWA DESI Total 758.33
40 - POETRY PROMOTION FUND NANCY MILLER GOMEZ POETRY READING 100.00 NANCY MILLER GOMEZ Total 100.00
40 - POETRY PROMOTION FUND RUTH BOLDUAN POETRY PROMO 100.00 RUTH BOLDUAN Total 100.00
40 - POETRY PROMOTION FUND SLOWFIBER POETRY PROMO 100.00 SLOWFIBER Total 100.00
40 - POETRY PROMOTION FUND US BANK C COYLE POETRY PROM 322.13 US BANK Total 322.13
43 - SLESF FUND ENTERPRISE FM TRUST FY24/25 LEASED VEHI 2,167.39 43 - SLESF FUND ENTERPRISE FM TRUST FY24/25 LEASED VEHI 2,231.55 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST Total 4,398.94
63 - CAPITAL IMPROV PROJ FUND MONTEREY PENINSULA POINT PINOS COASTAL 7,125.00 MONTEREY PENINSULA Total 7,125.00
70 - EMP BENEFIT FUND CALPERS HEALTH SEP24 RET & CHANGES 9,528.09 CALPERS HEALTH Total 9,528.09
70 - EMP BENEFIT FUND HEALTHEQUITY, INC. EMPLYEE USAGE HCFSA 10.00 70 - EMP BENEFIT FUND HEALTHEQUITY, INC. EMPLYEE USAGE HCFSA 59.80 HEALTHEQUITY, INC. Total 69.80
70 - EMP BENEFIT FUND PARS ARS PARS JULY FEES 357.27
PARS Total 357.27
70 - EMP BENEFIT FUND STANDARD INSURANCE SEP2024 PREMIUMS 2,634.71 70 - EMP BENEFIT FUND STANDARD INSURANCE AUG 2024 DENTAL 12,703.00 STANDARD INSURANCE Total 15,337.71
71 - WORKERS COMP FUND PARMA FY24/25 MEMBERSHIP 150.00
PARMA Total 150.00
71 - WORKERS COMP FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 750.00
PERS Total 750.00
72 - LIABILITY INS FUND PARMA FY24/25 MEMBERSHIP 150.00 PARMA Total 150.00
72 - LIABILITY INS FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL
PGCC 10-16-24
666.67

Page 56 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
PERS Total 666.67
74 - LOCAL WATER PROJECT CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 1313 OCEAN VIEW BLV 260,668.00 74 - LOCAL WATER PROJECT CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 1313 OCEAN VIEW BLV 44,727.43 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN Total 305,395.43
74 - LOCAL WATER PROJECT PACIFIC GAS & ELECT LMP 0792-1 10,207.99 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT Total 10,207.99
74 - LOCAL WATER PROJECT PERC WATER CORPORAT FY 24/25 LWP O&M 39,108.21 74 - LOCAL WATER PROJECT PERC WATER CORPORAT FY 24/25 LWP O&M 56,648.43 PERC WATER CORPORAT Total 95,756.64
75 - CEMETERY FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 1254 DELMONTECEM70% 250.64 75 - CEMETERY FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN CEM 4% 27.24
75 - CEMETERY FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN CEM 4% 22.66
75 - CEMETERY FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 1254 DELMONTECEM70% 174.38 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN Total 474.92
75 - CEMETERY FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP MORTAR MIX 45.32 75 - CEMETERY FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP CEM MORTAR MIX 11.33 75 - CEMETERY FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP MORTAR MIX 22.65 75 - CEMETERY FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP MORTAR MIX 22.65 75 - CEMETERY FUND HAYWARD LUMBER COMP MORTAR MIX 22.85 HAYWARD LUMBER COMP Total 124.80
75 - CEMETERY FUND LLORIN-VELASQUEZ CO CEM LANDSCAPE JULY 2,650.00 75 - CEMETERY FUND LLORIN-VELASQUEZ CO CEM LANDSCAPE AUG 2,650.00 LLORIN-VELASQUEZ CO Total 5,300.00
75 - CEMETERY FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.33 75 - CEMETERY FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.33 75 - CEMETERY FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 11.57 75 - CEMETERY FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.11 75 - CEMETERY FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.33 75 - CEMETERY FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.33 75 - CEMETERY FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.33 75 - CEMETERY FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.11 75 - CEMETERY FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.11 75 - CEMETERY FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.11 MISSION UNIFORM SER Total 448.66
75 - CEMETERY FUND MONTEREY TIRE SERVI REPAIRS CEM UNIT 71 730.01 MONTEREY TIRE SERVI Total 730.01
75 - CEMETERY FUND O'REILLY AUTO ENTER REPAIR CEM UNIT 71D 15.28 75 - CEMETERY FUND O'REILLY AUTO ENTER REPAIR CEM UNIT 71C 79.71 O'REILLY AUTO ENTER Total 94.99
75 - CEMETERY FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT CREST & RIPPLE 11.80 75 - CEMETERY FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT ELEC CEMETERY - 1% 31.59 75 - CEMETERY FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT CEMETERY 36.78
75 - CEMETERY FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT GAS CEMETERY - 1% 17.42 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT Total 97.59
75 - CEMETERY FUND PACIFIC GROVE HARDW CEMETERY SUPPLIES 199.45 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW Total 199.45
75 - CEMETERY FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 3,750.00
PERS Total 3,750.00
75 - CEMETERY FUND TURF STAR INC. REPAIRS CEM UNIT 71 410.12 75 - CEMETERY FUND TURF STAR INC. CEM UNIT 71D 359.88
TURF STAR INC. Total
PGCC 10-16-24
770.00

Page 57 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
76 - SEWER FUND ALBION ENVIRONNMENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONI 5,398.31 ALBION ENVIRONNMENT Total 5,398.31
76 - SEWER FUND AMAZON CAPITAL SERV PW SAFETY EQUIPMENT 101.59 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV Total 101.59
76 - SEWER FUND AT&T PW SEWER PHONE 1261 31.81
76 - SEWER FUND AT&T PW SEWER PH 1395 31.81
76 - SEWER FUND AT&T PW SEWER PHONE 2931 31.81
AT&T Total 95.43
76 - SEWER FUND BECKS SHOES AND REP MARTIN GONZALEZ BOO 212.66 BECKS SHOES AND REP Total 212.66
76 - SEWER FUND BOOT BARN INC ERIC ISMAEL & ARTUR 661.94 BOOT BARN INC Total 661.94
76 - SEWER FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 1273 CRESPI POND 50 73.85 76 - SEWER FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN SEWER 8% 54.48
76 - SEWER FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 100 OCEANVW IRRIG 43.72 76 - SEWER FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 100 OCEANVW IRRIG 43.11 76 - SEWER FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN SEWER 8% 45.31
76 - SEWER FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 1273 CRESPI POND 50 64.16 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN Total 324.63
76 - SEWER FUND CAPITAL ONE PUBLIC WASTEWTR INTEREST 9,609.53 76 - SEWER FUND CAPITAL ONE PUBLIC WASTEWTR PRINCIPAL 34,297.23 CAPITAL ONE PUBLIC Total 43,906.76
76 - SEWER FUND CHEVROLET OF WATSON CREDIT UNIT 44 SEWE (164.63) CHEVROLET OF WATSON Total (164.63)
76 - SEWER FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.33 76 - SEWER FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.33 76 - SEWER FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.11 76 - SEWER FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 11.57 76 - SEWER FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.11 76 - SEWER FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.11 76 - SEWER FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 85.11 76 - SEWER FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.33 76 - SEWER FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.33 76 - SEWER FUND MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN & UNIFORM CLE 19.33 MISSION UNIFORM SER Total 448.66
76 - SEWER FUND MONTEREY ONE WATER LIFT STATION MAINTE 54,239.80 MONTEREY ONE WATER Total 54,239.80
76 - SEWER FUND MONTEREY PENINSULA PHASE 9 SEWER IMPRO 14,005.19 76 - SEWER FUND MONTEREY PENINSULA PHASE 9 SEWER IMPRO 36,273.62 76 - SEWER FUND MONTEREY PENINSULA FY23/24 STREET REHA 145,397.50 MONTEREY PENINSULA Total 195,676.31
76 - SEWER FUND MUNICIPAL MAINTENAN NOZZLE 542.58
76 - SEWER FUND MUNICIPAL MAINTENAN SEWER NOZZLE 4,014.23 MUNICIPAL MAINTENAN Total 4,556.81
76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PW SEWER 4175-4 38.29 76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PW 5126-5 1,385.78
76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT OCEANVIEW BLVD 8TH 7.72 76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PUMP RUSSELL SVC CT 15.18 76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PUMP SUNSET ARENA 475.00 76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT O V 9TH PUMP #2 389.29 76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT EARDLEY PUMP #1
PGCC 10-16-24
168.84

Page 58 ends

FUND NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION
AMOUNT
76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 360 OCEAN VIEW BLVD 170.17 76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PUMP 17TH & OCNVW 174.37 76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PUMP SUNSET ARENA 206.78 76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT EARDLEY PUMP #1 65.97 76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 17TH & OCNVW 67.02
76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 1996 SUNSET DR. 69.57 76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 471 OCEAN VIEW BL. 74.00 76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 1996 SUNSET DR. 19.63 76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 520 OCEAN VIEW BLVD 20.00 76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PUMP SUNSET ARENA 15.63 76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PUMP STATION 27.02
76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 471 OCEAN VIEW BL. 28.25 76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 520 OCEAN VIEW BLVD 54.86 76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PUMP RUSSELL SVC CT 60.31 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT Total 3,533.68
76 - SEWER FUND PACIFIC GROVE HARDW SEWER SUPPLIES 182.07 PACIFIC GROVE HARDW Total 182.07
76 - SEWER FUND PERS SEP 2024 UAL 11,750.00
PERS Total 11,750.00
76 - SEWER FUND PJ TRUCKING ACADEMY CLASS B TRAINING - 11,600.00 76 - SEWER FUND PJ TRUCKING ACADEMY CLASS B TRAINING - 11,600.00 PJ TRUCKING ACADEMY Total 23,200.00
76 - SEWER FUND PURE WATER SEWER WATER SERVICE 25.80
PURE WATER Total 25.80
77 - GOLF FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 77 ASILOMAR GOLF HS 2,419.04 77 - GOLF FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 1273 CRESPI POND 50 73.85 77 - GOLF FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 1254 DELMONTEGOLF30 107.42 77 - GOLF FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 77 ASILOMAR FIRE SV 102.35 77 - GOLF FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 1254 DELMONTEGOLF30 174.39 77 - GOLF FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 77 ASILOMAR FIRE SV 100.93 77 - GOLF FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 1273 CRESPI POND 50 64.16 77 - GOLF FUND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN 77 ASILOMAR GOLF HS 2,182.73 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN Total 5,224.87
77 - GOLF FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 1313 OCEAN VIEW BLV 97.76 77 - GOLF FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 1313 OCEAN VIEW BLV 38.68 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT Total 136.44
84 - AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN-ARPA ALLSTAR PAINTING & CIP23-10 FD PAINTIN 5,000.00 ALLSTAR PAINTING & Total 5,000.00
84 - AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN-ARPA SHELLCO GENERAL CON CIP 23-12 FIRE DEPT 28,093.40 SHELLCO GENERAL CON Total 28,093.40
84 - AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN-ARPA THE MONTEREY COUNTY AMER RESCUE STREETS 115.62 THE MONTEREY COUNTY Total 115.62
93 - KOO ESTATE DONATION JUDGE NETTING, INC. BACKSTOP REPLACEMEN 1,165.50 JUDGE NETTING, INC. Total 1,165.50
Grand Total 3,908,447.57
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 59 ends

FUND TRANSACTION AMOUNT
01 - GENERAL FUND Total $2,955,107.85
07 - LIBRARY BLDG & EQUIP FUND Total $1,486.83
08 - MUSEUM IMPROVEMENT FUND Total $33,768.48
10 - HOSPITALITY IMPRVMT DIST. Total $40,375.00
15 - HOUSING FUND Total $1,981.25
18 - GAS TAX FUND Total $20,778.43
24 - STILLWELL CHILDREN'S POOL Total $426.72
27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. Total $7,110.88
40 - POETRY PROMOTION FUND Total $1,642.52
43 - SLESF FUND Total $4,398.94
63 - CAPITAL IMPROV PROJ FUND Total $7,125.00
70 - EMP BENEFIT FUND Total $25,292.87
71 - WORKERS COMP FUND Total $900.00
72 - LIABILITY INS FUND Total $816.67
74 - LOCAL WATER PROJECT Total $411,360.06
75 - CEMETERY FUND Total $11,990.42
76 - SEWER FUND Total $344,149.82
77 - GOLF FUND Total $5,361.31
84 - AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN-ARPA Total $33,209.02
93 - KOO ESTATE DONATION Total $1,165.50
Grand Total $3,908,447.57
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 60 ends

Agenda No. 9 A

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joyce Halabi, Deputy Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: October 16, 2024
SUBJECT: On-Call Concrete Contractor
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION
Motion to authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Monterey Peninsula Engineering for on-call concrete services agreement in an amount not to exceed $75,000 with one (1) option to extend via mutual letter for one additional year.

1. 2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action.

DISCUSSION
The City’s Public Works Department manages public spaces within both the built and natural environments. This includes constructing and maintaining public concrete infrastructure, such as ADA ramps, curbs, gutters, certain sidewalks, staircases, driveway approaches, and other concrete elements.

While major infrastructure projects are funded through the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), smaller maintenance tasks are handled by the Public Works Crews. However, as it relates to concrete infrastructure, there is a gap between large-scale CIP-funded projects and smaller routine maintenance that requires attention that relates to concrete infrastructure. This includes tasks like curb and gutter repairs, ADA ramp installations under the Sidewalk Development Policy, and addressing damage reported by residents.

Some of these repairs, while within the skill set of in-house crews, require more time and materials than can be efficiently allocated due to other ongoing priorities. In such cases, the City’s municipal code requires a competitive process, which requires obtaining at least three quotes or, for larger projects, putting them out to bid (Pacific Grove Municipal Code Section 2.16, Purchasing System and Procedures). This process can be time-consuming and often delays repairs/improvements.

Many municipal agencies use on-call contracts to expedite tasks, enhance efficiency, and improve service delivery. An on-call concrete agreement would act as a job order contract, supplementing City staff with a readily available workforce to repair the City’s concrete infrastructure as needed.

RFP PROCESS
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 61 ends

The City allocated $75,000 through the Public Works Operating budget for concrete work and issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for on-call concrete services. The RFP was designed to gather pricing for various types of concrete tasks that may be assigned to the contractor by the City. It was released on July 3, 2024, and closed on August 8, 2024.

One (1) bid was received from Monterey Peninsula Engineering.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of work generally includes repairs, replacement, and construction of concrete and hot mix asphalt surfaces, such as pavements, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, sidewalk crossings, curb ramps, cross gutters, retaining walls, and related tasks at various times and locations as needed.

AGREEMENT
The agreement will have a one-year term with an annual funding limit of $75,000, and it includes an option for a one-year extension under the same funding limit. The extension can be executed through a mutual letter signed by the Mayor. The total contract term will not exceed two years. The specific amount of work during the initial or optional extension period cannot be precisely defined in advance, as work will be issued through individual Work Orders.

If approved, the City’s standard construction agreement template will be harnessed. This agreement has been approved by the California Joint Powers Authority (CJPIA) and the City Attorney’s Office.

NEXT STEPS
Once the contract is executed, tasks will be assigned to the contractor and quoted according to the bid schedule. There is no obligation to use the full allocated funds if the work is not needed. Tasks will be assigned based on necessity and scheduled for timely completion.

OPTIONS

1. Authorize the agreement

2. Do not authorize the agreement.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:
$75,000 has been approved as part of the Public Works Operating Budget for concrete repairs, maintenance and improvements.

FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Infrastructure
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 62 ends

Agenda No. 9 B

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joyce Halabi, Deputy Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: October 16, 2024
SUBJECT: Agreement with 4Leaf for On-Call Traffic Engineering Services CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION
Motion to authorize the Mayor to sign extensions of the Professional Services Agreement with 4Leaf for On-Call Traffic Engineering Services.

1. 2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

DISCUSSION
On June 7, 2023, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with 4Leaf Inc. for On-Call Traffic Engineering Services (“Agreement”) in an amount not to exceed $70,000 per fiscal year.

The Council approved term of the agreement through June 30, 2024, with options to extend annually for two (2) additional one (1) year periods. The method by which extensions would be executed was not stipulated.

The recommended action is to authorize Mayor to sign extensions of the Agreement for the periods specified in the Agreement.

In July 2024, City staff presented the existing Public Works agreements that had been approved by the council, which included options for extension but did not specify how those extensions would be executed. It was recommended that the mayor be authorized to sign the extensions for these agreements, which covered the City's Street Sweeping and Sanitary Sewer Maintenance Services. Both agreements were approved by the council at that time. However, this particular agreement was overlooked and is now being brought back to formalize the mayor's ability to sign the extensions specified in the base agreement.

OPTIONS
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 63 ends

1. Authorize the Mayor to sign the extensions
Do not authorize the Mayor to sign extensions. Failure to authorize the Mayor to sign the extensions would result in an impact to on-call traffic engineering services

2. FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Funding has been allocated in the FY24/25 Public Works Operating Budget to allow for this agreement.

FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Infrastructure
Attachments
4Leaf Agreement
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 64 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 65 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 66 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 67 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 68 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 69 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 70 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 71 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 72 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 73 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 74 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 75 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 76 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 77 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 78 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 79 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 80 ends

Agenda No. 11 A

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian Pierik, City Attorney
MEETING DATE: October 16, 2024
SUBJECT: ATC Hotel Project: Adoption of Uncodified Ordinance Conditionally Ordering Vacation of Portion of Sloat Avenue and Proposed Agreement For Purchase Of Right-Of-Way and Joint Escrow Instructions for Sloat Avenue CEQA: Environmental Impact Report

RECOMMENDATION
Motion to Adopt Uncodified Ordinance Conditionally Ordering Vacation of Portion of Sloat Avenue.

1. Motion to authorize the Mayor to sign Proposed Agreement For Purchase Of Right-Of-Way and Joint Escrow Instructions for Portion of Sloat Avenue.

2. 3. Other action related to this agenda item as Council determines appropriate.

DISCUSSION
I. Agenda Report for City Council Meeting on September 18, 2024 On September 18, 2024, an Agenda Report was presented to the City Council for discussion of the American Tin Cannery (ATC) Project, a proposed Resolution Declaring City’s Intent to Vacate Excess Right-Of-Way Located on Portion of Sloat Avenue, a proposed Resolution Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 for Exempt Surplus Land, and a first reading on a proposed Uncodified Ordinance Conditionally Ordering Vacation. The September 18, 2024 Agenda Report is Attachment 3 to this Agenda Report.

The Agenda Report for September 18, 2024 had 16 attachments and included a discussion of the following subjects:

Measure X which was a voter initiated ballot measure to change the zoning of the ATC site to allow for hotels as a permitted use and the boundaries of the district included Sloat Avenue contiguous to the ATC site.

1. City Council actions taken on January 12, 2022 including the adoption of three Resolutions:

Resolution No. 22-001 (Adopting Environmental Findings), Resolution No. 22-002 (Approval of a Coastal Development Permit and other permits and 77 Conditions of Approval) and Resolution No. 22-003 (Declaration of Intent to Vacate Sloat Avenue). An appeal was filed with the California Coastal Commission following the City Council actions taken on January 12, 2022.

2. PGCC 10-16-24

Page 81 ends

Discussion of the history regarding proposed vacation of Sloat Avenue in 2022 including action of January 12, 2022 approving Resolution No. 22-003 and the Council discussion on May 18, 2022 when the Council tabled the Resolution to Vacate to a date and time uncertain. As of May 18, 2022, the Coastal Commission had not yet rendered a decision on the appeal of the Coastal Development Permit for the Project.

3. Actions of the California Coastal Commission (“CCC”) including the Staff Report of March 22, 2024 with standard conditions and special conditions including a deed restriction and reference to the following statement from the CCC Staff Report (page 83):

4. “As proposed and as conditioned, the project meets the LCP’s requirements for public view and public access protection and provision overall, as well as the specific directives for this specific site. It also adequately mitigates for the project’s impacts to public streets. The end result is a project that should be a measurable improvement over the status quo and one worthy of this prime coastal setting.”
Also noted in the Agenda Report of September 18, 2024 was the following conclusion in the CCC Staff Report (page 88):
“The Commission’s review, analysis, and decision-making process for CDPs and CDP amendments has been certified by the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency as being the functional equivalent of the environmental review required by CEQA (CCR Section 15251(f)).

Accordingly, in fulfilling that review, this report has analyzed the relevant coastal resource issues with the proposal, has addressed comments received, and has identified appropriate and necessary modifications to address adverse impacts to such coastal resources. The Commission finds that only as modified and conditioned herein will the proposed project avoid significant adverse effects on the environment within the meaning of CEQA. Thus, the proposed project as modified will not result in any significant environmental effects for which feasible mitigation measures have not been employed, consistent with CEQA Section 21080.5(d)(2)(A).” The Agenda Report of September 18, 2024 noted that on September 6, 2024, Kevin Kahn (District Manager of the Central Coast District Office of the CCC) confirmed in an email to the City Manager that the Commission’s CDP approval provides the requisite authorization under the Coastal Act and LCP to use a portion of Sloat Avenue in a different way (i.e., from public street use to hotel use).

5. There was a discussion on September 18, 2024 about the lawsuit filed by Pacific Grove Coast Watch and Anthony Ciani with the Monterey County Superior Court which alleged that the EIR for the ATC project is lacking in critical aspects and thus fails to properly analyze the environmental impact of the Project. The Parties to this Lawsuit agreed to a stay pending the result of the action by the CCC on the appeal of the CDP. On May 29, 2024, following the action of the CCC taken on April 11, 2024 (as described above), the Petitioners filed a dismissal of the Lawsuit.

II. Actions Taken on September 18, 2024
The actions taken by the City Council on September 18, 2024 by a unanimous 7-0 vote were the following:

Adoption of Resolution Declaring City’s Intent to Vacate Excess Right-Of-Way Located on Portion of Sloat Avenue

1. 2. Adoption of Resolution Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 for Exempt Surplus Land PGCC 10-16-24

Page 82 ends

3. Introduction of the proposed Uncodified Ordinance Conditionally Ordering Vacation III. Conditions of Proposed Uncodified Ordinance
There are six conditions which must be satisfied before the Proposed Ordinance conditionally Ordering Vacation would become effective after the Ordinance is adopted as follows:

Developer of the ATC Development (the “Developer”) has submitted a plan or plans for utility relocation and maintenance (including the temporary protection or provision for utility connection to adjacent properties throughout the course of construction) of existing public and private utilities, including but not limited to fiber optics owned by the Monterey Bay Aquarium Foundation, which is approved by the City and the appropriate utility.

1. The City and Developer have entered into a legally binding agreement (the “Agreement”) for the conveyance of the City’s interest in the land underlying the existing easement. If the City and Developer do not enter into such agreement within ninety (90) days of the date of adoption of this ordinance, this ordinance will be null and void.

2. The City has to its reasonable satisfaction determined that the existing rights of the property owners in the vicinity of the Excess Right-of-Way, including the right to access, use, and develop their parcels now and in the future, consistent with state and local law, have been maintained or an alternative arrangement has been made consistent with the terms of the ATC Development approvals, including CEQA and applicable mitigation measures.

3. Pursuant to the Agreement the City’s interest in the land underlying the Excess Right-of-Way has been conveyed from the City to the Developer.

4. This ordinance has been recorded by the City Clerk with the Monterey County Recorder following the Close of Escrow, as that term is defined in the Agreement, and the City’s interest in the underlying property has been quit-claimed from the City to the Developer.

5. The passage of thirty (30) days following the adoption of this ordinance in accordance with Article 15 of the City Charter.

6. IV. Area of Sloat Proposed To Be Vacated.

1. Previous Area Proposed for Vacation -- .61 Acres (26,778 square feet) On May 18, 2022, the proposed Resolution to Vacate included as a legal description Exhibit A stating:
“Being all that right of way of Sloat Avenue lying between Eardley Avenue and Dewey Avenue.

Containing an area of 0.61 acres, more or less.” Exhibit B is a sketch which shows by hash marks the “Area Proposed for Vacation” which depicts Sloat Avenue from Eardley Avenue to Dewey Avenue including the area of Sloat Avenue adjacent to Lots 11, 12 and 13. The legal description and sketch are Attachment 4.

2. Current Area Proposed for Vacation -.45 Acres (19,602 square feet) The developer provided the City with a revised legal description for the area of Sloat proposed to be vacated which is attached as Exhibits to the Resolution Declaring Intent to Vacate and Resolution relating to Surplus Property and the Proposed Ordinance. The revised legal description and sketch is PGCC 10-16-24

Page 83 ends

Attachment 5 to this Agenda Report.

As shown in the sketch included in Attachment 5, the proposed area to be vacated does not include the area of Sloat Avenue adjacent to Lots 11, 12 and 13 (Remainder of Sloat Avenue). The Remainder of Sloat Avenue is not necessary for the Project.

V. Appraisal of Sloat Avenue
In October 2020, Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. (AR/WS) submitted an Appraisal Report which included an appraisal of the .61 acres of Sloat that, at the time, was being considered for vacation. The appraisal amount for Sloat was $1,842,793. The Appraisal Report also appraised a portion of Ocean View Boulevard (3190 square feet), however, Ocean View Boulevard will not be vacated and, instead, will be the subject of an encroachment permit which is addressed in the proposed Agreement with the developer discussed below. The October 2020 AR/WS Report may be found at here.

On December 17, 2021 AR/WS submitted to Anastazia Ariz (Community Development Director) a Memorandum Addendum (Attachment 6) with an updated appraisal for the .61 acres of Sloat Avenue in the amount of $1,917,665 based on a fee interest of the City in Sloat.

VI. Proposed Agreement For Purchase Of Right-Of-Way and Joint Escrow Instructions This Agreement (Attachment 2) covers a number of items including, but not limited to, the following:

1. Conditions of Approval. Paragraph 3 of the Agreement confirms that the developer is required to comply with all conditions of approval and other approvals and permits issued by the City and the California Coastal Commission.

2. Compensation. Paragraph 6 of the Agreement provides that the amount to be paid to the City by the developer for the vacation of Sloat Avenue is $1,917,665 (One million nine hundred seventeen thousand six hundred sixty-five Dollars) which is the amount stated in the December 17, 2021 Report by AR/WS. In regard to the amount of compensation, this is addressed in Section VII of this Agenda Report.

3. Contribution to Transportation. Paragraph 8 of the Agreement provides for the developer to make a contribution of not to exceed $50,000 toward a local transportation program.

4. Utility Relocation. Paragraph 9 of the Agreement confirms that the developer will pay the cost to relocate any utilities in the vacated portion of Sloat.

5. Public Improvement Agreement. Paragraph 10 of the Agreement confirms that the developer will enter into a Public Improvement Agreement with the City for the construction of public improvements which shall be secured and will require insurance.

6. Ordinance. Paragraph 13 references the Ordinance vacating Sloat. The First Reading and introduction of this Ordinance was at the City Council meeting on September 18, 2024. The Second Reading of the Ordinance is set for a public hearing at the City Council meeting set for October 16, 2024.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 84 ends

7. Indemnification. Paragraph 14 of the Agreement requires the developer to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City from all claims relating to or arising in any manner from the vacation of Sloat Avenue and/or the encroachment permit for the Ocean View Property.

8. City’s Repurchase Option. See Paragraph 20 of the Agreement which provides the City an option to repurchase the area of Sloat vacated if the Developer fails to complete the construction of the Project in substantial conformity with the plans for the Project approved by the City (as such approval may be changed from time to time) within four (4) years from the date on which Developer commences construction of the Project, which date shall be within one year of the City’s issuance of the building permit. The repurchase price is equal to the amount of original Compensation less an amount equal to the City’s cost of restoring the Property to its condition immediately prior to the Close of Escrow under this Agreement.

VII. Compensation to City for Sloat Avenue
As noted above, Paragraph 6 of the Agreement provides that the amount of compensation to be paid by the developer for the vacation of .45 acres of Sloat Avenue (19,602 square feet) is $1,917,665.

As also noted, the area of Sloat which was proposed to be vacated in 2021, and was the basis of the appraisal and the updated appraisal, was .61 acres (26,778 square feet).

However, the area of Sloat currently proposed to be vacated is .45 acres (19,602 square feet). The legal description for the portion of Sloat to be vacated does not extend all the way to Dewey as it does not include the area of Sloat adjacent to lots 11, 12 and 13. .45 acre is 73.2% of .61 acre. 73.2% of $1,917,665 is $1,403,730.78 which is $513,934.22 less than $1,917,665 which may be considered in the value calculation for compensation of Sloat Avenue and the potential increase in value from December 2021 to present.

In addition, the appraisal of Sloat Avenue was based on a fee interest and the value of an easement is generally to be considered at 90% of the fee value. 10% of the $1,917,665 is $191,766,50 which is another factor that may be considered in the value calculation.

VIII. Recommended Actions for City Council
Motion to Adopt Uncodified Ordinance Conditionally Ordering Vacation of Portion of Sloat Avenue as described in Attachment 1.

1. Motion to authorize the Mayor to sign Proposed Agreement For Purchase Of Right-Of-Way and Joint Escrow Instructions for Portion of Sloat Avenue as described in Attachment 2.

2. 3. Other action related to this agenda item as Council determines appropriate.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City Council certified the Environmental Impact Report for the ATC Hotel Project by Resolution 22-001 on January 12, 2022.

OPTIONS
FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Pursuant to the Proposed Agreement For Purchase Of Right-Of-Way and Joint Escrow Instructions, the City will receive compensation from the developer in the amount of $1,917,665.00.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 85 ends

FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.

Attachments
1 - Uncodified Ord re Vacation of Sloat
2 - Proposed Agreement For Purchase Of Right-Of-Way and Joint Escrow Instructions 3 - September 18, 2024 Agenda Report on ATC Hotel Project 4 - Legal Description and Sketch for .61 Acres of Sloat Avenue 5 – Legal Description and Sketch for .45 Acres of Sloat Avenue 6 – December 17, 2021 AR/WS Memorandum Addendum
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 86 ends

ATTACHMENT 3
4891-6582-3203v1 1
ORDINANCE NO. 24-__

AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE CONDITIONALLY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHT-OFWAY LOCATED ON SLOAT AVENUE, EXCEPTING AND RESERVING RIGHTS FOR

EXISTING AND PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY FACILITIES
FACTS

1. The City of Pacific Grove (“City”) passed Resolution No. 24-___ on September 18, 2024, declaring its intention to vacate the excess public right-of-way easement on the real property located on Sloat Avenue (the “Excess Right-of-Way”), which is approximately 19,602 square feet and adjacent to the proposed American Tin Cannery Hotel and Commercial development (together, the “ATC Development”).

2. The proposed adjacent ATC Development includes certain development and uses on a portion of the Excess Right-of-Way which the City will no longer need to maintain once the ATC Development is approved and constructed.

3. The City certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on January 12, 2022, for the ATC Development (SCH #2019110152) and made the requisite CEQA findings for the certification of the EIR. The EIR evaluated the environmental impacts of the project including the development and uses of the subject Excess Right-Of-Way, and as such, no additional CEQA review is required.

4. On October 28, 2021 and November 18, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on the ATC Development and reviewed the vacation for conformity with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65402.

5. On January 12, 2022, the City Council heard an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision on the ATC Development and reviewed the vacation for conformity with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65402. The City Council found the vacation of the subject Excess Right-of-Way to be in conformance with the City’s General Plan.

6. On April 11, 2024, the California Coastal Commission (“CCC”) conducted appellate proceedings on the City’s approval of the ATC Development, determined that the ATC Development as modified will not result in any significant environmental effects for which feasible mitigation measures have not been employed, consistent with CEQA Section 21080.5(d)(2)(A), and approved the ATC Development subject to five (5) standard conditions and sixteen (16) special conditions.

7. No further CEQA review or action is required in connection with this condition order of vacation of the Excess Right-of Way pursuant to Division 9, Part 3, Chapter 3 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the “Vacation Statute”).

8. The Vacation Statute allows the City Council to adopt a resolution vacating excess street rights-of-way that are no longer required for street purposes, excepting and reserving rights for existing and proposed public utility facilities.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 87 ends

4891-6582-3203v1 2

9. Article 15(g) of the City’s Charter provides, in pertinent part, that except as provided by General Law, or by this Charter, no action providing for the….acquisition, sale, lease, encumbrancing or disposition of real property of the City, or any interest therein….shall be taken except by ordinance.

10. Government Code Section 50020 provides that “[w]hen a statute requires a local agency to take legislative action by resolution and the local agency is required by its charter to take legislative action by ordinance, action by ordinance is compliance with the statute for all purposes.”

11. The Excess Right-of-Way described in both legal and map form in Exhibits A and B, is no longer needed for street purposes should the ATC Development receive all necessary Building Permits as well as approvals for any associated relocation or rerouting of existing public and private utilities; and

12. The City Council has duly considered the staff report and public comments, if any, and desires to vacate the Excess Right-of-Way.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The foregoing Facts are adopted as findings of the City Council as though set forth in full within the body of this ordinance.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby elects to proceed under and pursuant to the provision of Division 9, Part 3, Chapter 3 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and in particular, Sections 8324 thereof, and hereby orders the vacation of the Excess Right-of-Way described in Exhibit A, and shown on the plot labeled Exhibit B, each such Exhibit attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference.

SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect only upon, and the vacation of the Excess Right-of-Way is conditioned upon and shall not be effective until, the occurrence of all of the following:
a. Developer of the ATC Development (the “Developer”) has submitted a plan or plans for utility relocation and maintenance (including the temporary protection or provision for utility connection to adjacent properties throughout the course of construction) of existing public and private utilities, including but not limited to fiber optics owned by the Monterey Bay Aquarium Foundation, which is approved by the City and the appropriate utility; and
b. The City and Developer have entered into a legally binding agreement (the “Agreement”) for the conveyance of the City’s interest in the land underlying the existing easement. If the City and Developer do not enter into such agreement within ninety (90) days of the date of adoption of this ordinance, this ordinance will be null and void; and
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 88 ends

4891-6582-3203v1 3
c. The City has to its reasonable satisfaction determined that the existing rights of the property owners in the vicinity of the Excess Right-of-Way, including the right to access, use, and develop their parcels now and in the future, consistent with state and local law, have been maintained or an alternative arrangement has been made consistent with the terms of the ATC Development approvals, including CEQA and applicable mitigation measures.
d. Pursuant to the Agreement the City’s interest in the land underlying the Excess Right-of-Way has been conveyed from the City to the Developer; and e. This ordinance has been recorded by the City Clerk with the Monterey County Recorder following the Close of Escrow, as that term is defined in the Agreement, and the City’s interest in the underlying property has been quit claimed from the City to the Developer.
f. The passage of thirty (30) days following the adoption of this ordinance in accordance with Article 15 of the City Charter.

SECTION 4. That from and after the date this ordinance is recorded, the Excess Right-ofWay is vacated and no longer constitutes a public right-of-way.

SECTION 5. If any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or any part thereof, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, or any part thereof, or its application to other persons or circumstances. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted each provision, section, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, paragraphs, subparagraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 6. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this Ordinance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE this 16th day of October, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:

BILL PEAKE, Mayor
ATTEST:

DATED:_______________________
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 89 ends

4891-6582-3203v1 4
SANDRA ANN KANDELL, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BRIAN PIERIK, City Attorney
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 90 ends

4891-6582-3203v1 A-1
Exhibit A
Legal Description
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 91 ends

4891-6582-3203v1 B-1
Exhibit B
Plot Depiction
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 92 ends

11134.00024/1377758v2

AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY AND JOINT ESCROW

INSTRUCTIONS
This Agreement For Purchase Of Right-Of-WayAnd Joint Escrow Instructions (the "Agreement") is entered into by the City of Pacific Grove, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and Foursome Development Company, a California general partnership (“Purchaser”) and CCS Pacific Grove, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer”). The City, the Developer, and the Purchaser are sometimes referred to in this Agreement, each individually, as a “Party,” or collectively, as the “Parties.” Purchaser and Developer are sometimes collectively referred to in this Agreement as the “Buyer Parties.” This Agreement will be effective as of the date the Agreement is signed by last of the City, the Purchaser and Developer (“Effective Date”).

RECITALS
This Agreement is entered into with reference to the following recitals of fact (“Recitals”) that City, Purchaser, and Developer believe to be true as of the Effective Date of this Agreement:

A. Developer is the Optionee, and Purchaser is the Optionor, pursuant to that certain Option to Lease Real Property dated as of August 16, 2018 (the “Option”), with respect to the real property described in Exhibit A hereto (the “ATC Site”). Developer, pursuant to the Option intends to enter into a Lease with Purchaser for the ATC Site (the “Lease”), and upon exercise of the Option and entering into the Lease desires to demolish the 165,000 square feet of factory outlet space located at the ATC Site and construct a 222 room hotel with spa, fitness center, restaurant, bars, meeting space, approximately 11,000 square feet of retail space, and other commercial uses on the ATC Site and adjacent parcels, which project is more commonly known as the ATC Hotel and Commercial Project (the “Project”).

B. On January 12, 2022, the City Council approved a conditional development permit (“CDP”) for the development of a 225-room hotel-resort facility on the approximately 6-acre American Tin Cannery site, including portions of right-of-way on Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard.

C. On April 11, 2024, the California Coastal Commission (“CCC”) acted on Appeal Number A-3-PGR-22-0004, taking jurisdiction over the CDP application for the proposed project and approved a conditioned CDP, contemplating the vacation of Sloat Avenue between Eardley Avenue and Dewey Avenue and a City issued encroachment permit for the private use of public right of way on Ocean View Avenue.

D. Developer’s Project, in part, contemplates the vacation of portions of, and the acquisition of any remaining City interest in portions of Sloat Avenue east of Dewey Avenue and west of Eardley Avenue in Pacific Grove (the “Sloat Property”), as described in Exhibit B attached hereto. The Project also requires Developer to obtain an encroachment permit over that certain portion of Ocean View Boulevard (the “Ocean View Property”), as described in Exhibit C attached hereto. The Sloat Property and the Ocean View Property shall collectively be referred to as the “Property” in this Agreement.

E. Pursuant to the Option, Purchaser proposes to acquire the Sloat Property and will include the legal descriptions of the Sloat Property and the Ocean View Property in the legal PGCC 10-16-24

Page 93 ends

11134.00024/1377758v2
2 description of the ATC Site as of the Closing Date, as said term is defined herein. For the purposes of this Agreement, all references to the ATC Site that pertain to a time period or date after the Closing Date, as said term is hereinafter defined, shall include the Sloat Property and the Ocean View Property. Accordingly, Purchaser’s acquisition of the Sloat Property, and Developer’s obtaining an Encroachment Permit for the Ocean View Property and Developer’s subsequent construction and completion of the Project (as defined below), in part, on the Property pursuant to the terms of this Agreement is in the best interest of the City and the health, safety and welfare of the City’s taxpayers and residents and is in accordance with the public purposes set forth in applicable law. Implementation of this Agreement will further the goals and objectives of the City’s general plan by: (i) strengthening the City’s land use and social structure, and (ii) alleviating economic and physical blight on the Property and in the surrounding community.

F. The City desires, after all necessary public hearings and actions, and subject to the terms of this Agreement, to vacate its existing interest and rights in the Sloat Property and to convey any remaining interest of City in the Sloat Property to the Purchaser to facilitate the development of the Project and the Purchaser desires to obtain title to the Sloat Property free and clear of all easements and rights of way which prohibit or encumber development of the Project, in order to permit Developer to obtain commercially available financing and to develop the Project.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth in this Agreement and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged by City, Purchaser and Developer, the Parties agree as follows:

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. Recitals.

The foregoing Recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by this reference as though set forth in full.

2. Project
The Project which is the subject of this Agreement is the Project as described in Recital A hereinabove.

3. Conditions of Approval
The Developer agrees to comply with all conditions of approval and other approvals and permits issued by the City and the California Coastal Commission.

4. Agreement to Commence Right-of-Way Vacation Proceedings for Sloat Avene.

City agrees, upon the terms and for the compensation (“Compensation”) set forth in this Agreement, to commence proceedings for the vacation of that certain right-of-way over a portion of the street commonly known as Sloat Avenue, (the “Sloat Avenue Property”), situated in the City of Pacific Grove, County of Monterey, State of California, which is legally described in the Legal Description attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 94 ends

11134.00024/1377758v2
3 5. Agreement Regarding Encroachment Permit for Ocean View Avenue City agrees, upon the terms set forth in this Agreement, and applicable provisions of the City Municipal Code and city policies, to process an application by Developer for an encroachment permit for a portion of the street commonly known as Ocean View Boulevard (the “Ocean View Avenue Property”), situated in the City of Pacific Grove, County of Monterey, State of California, which is legally described in the Legal Description attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein.

6. Compensation.

The compensation to be paid to the City by Purchaser for the vacation of the Sloat Avenue Property will be $1,917,665 (One million nine hundred seventeen thousand six hundred sixty-five Dollars). Purchaser shall pay the Compensation by depositing into Escrow, on or prior to the Closing Date, immediately available funds in the total amount of the Compensation.

7. Conveyance of Title to Sloat Avenue Property.

Subject to the City Council, in its sole and absolute discretion, affirmatively vacating the Sloat Property, and subsequent thereto, City agrees to convey by deed (the “Deed”) to Purchaser title to the Sloat Avenue Property, free and clear of all recorded and unrecorded liens, encumbrances, assessments, easements, leases, and taxes except current taxes not yet due and payable; covenants, conditions, restrictions and reservations of records; and easements created by Purchaser, provided, however, that Developer and Purchaser shall cause all tenants of the ATC Site to vacate their leaseholds before closing Sloat Avenue to such tenants and their invitees.

8. Contribution to Transportation.

Developer to make a monetary contribution in the amount not to exceed $50,000, toward a local transportation program (local shuttle, trolley, MST route extension, or similar program).

To the extent permissible, the monetary contribution may be credited toward the required Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program as required in ATC Hotel and Commercial Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation measure MM GHG 2.1. Monetary contribution to be provided at building permit issuance for the Project.
9 Utilities
Developer, at its sole expense, shall relocate, if necessary, any and all utilities which may exist in the vacated portion of Sloat Avenue Property.

10. Parking
Developer agrees to provide public parking at 124 Central before the Developer takes action to remove the public parking on the portion of Sloat Avenue that is vacated.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 95 ends

11134.00024/1377758v2
4 11. Public Improvement Agreement.

Prior to the Close of Escrow, Developer shall enter into a public improvement agreement with the City, obligating Developer to construct the public improvements required as a CDP condition of approval of the Project by the City and the CCC. Such public improvement agreement shall be secured by one of the forms of security set forth in Government Code Section 66410 et seq. and shall include requirements for the Developer name the City and its officers, officials, employees and agents as insureds, or additional insureds, for liability insurance. The public improvement agreement will require that if the project is not completed that the Developer will restore all public improvements to their pre-construction condition to the extent feasible.

The public improvement agreement shall be subject to approval by the City Manager in consultation with the City Attorney.

12. Reimbursement.

Developer agrees to reimburse City for staff costs associated with the processing of the Sloat Avenue in the lump sum amount of Thirty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($30,000.00). Said amount shall be deposited by Developer with the Escrow Agent and the Escrow Agent shall disburse the $30,000.00 to the City at Close of Escrow or upon the earlier termination of the Escrow.

13. Ordinance
The City Council, in its sole and absolute discretion, shall consider an ordinance (“Ordinance”) authorizing the vacation of Sloat Avenue. The Ordinance shall include conditions prior to the Ordinance becoming effective. The Developer agrees to provide the City prior to Close of Escrow with documentation which shall be subject to approval of the City Manager in consultation with the City Attorney that all conditions set forth in the Ordinance have been satisfied.

14. Indemnification
Developer and Purchaser shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify, release, defend (with counsel approved in writing by the City), and hold harmless City and its officers, agents, contractors, and employees (collectively, the “City Indemnitees”), from and against any and all claims, actions, liabilities, losses, damages, fees, costs and expenses, including for and on account of any damage or injury to any person or to real or personal property of any person, including but not limited to attorney’s fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation (collectively, “Claims”), arising out of (a) the City’s vacation of Sloat Avenue; (b) the closure of Sloat Avenue; and/or (c) the encroachment permit for the Ocean View Property.

15. Escrow.

The Parties have opened or shall open an escrow (the "Escrow") in accordance with this Agreement at Chicago Title Company, Attn: Jennifer Lewis (the "Escrow Agent"). The Escrow Agent shall also act as the issuer of title insurance in connection with the transaction contemplated herein (the “Title Company”).

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 96 ends

11134.00024/1377758v2
5 15.1 This Agreement, together with the escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Agent and executed by the Parties, constitutes the joint escrow instructions of the Parties, and Escrow Agent to whom these instructions are delivered is hereby empowered to act under this Agreement.

15.2 Prior to the Close of escrow, as defined herein, the City shall deliver into Escrow a certified copy of its Resolution of Vacation of the Property, as recorded in the official records of the County of Monterey, and shall execute, acknowledge and deliver into Escrow the Deed in a form approved by Parties and reasonably acceptable to the Title Company.

15.3 The term “Close of Escrow” shall mean the date on which the Deed and other necessary instruments of vacation and conveyance are recorded in the office of the Monterey County Recorder. The Close of Escrow shall occur 30 days after the last to occur of satisfaction of the following conditions, or such earlier date as agreed to by the parties: (a) the expiration of the deadline to file a legal challenge to the Ordinance approving the sale of Sloat Avenue to the Purchaser without a legal challenge being filed, (b) Title Company shall be unconditionally committed to issue to Purchaser an ALTA owners’ extended policy of title insurance, with coverage in the full amount of the Purchase Price and insuring fee title to the Sloat Property; (c) Developer has obtained the Regulatory Approvals, subject to conditions of approval acceptable to Buyer Parties in their sole discretion, any applicable appeal period has expired without appeal having been filed or, if an appeal is filed, such appeal has been denied, and no legal action has been instituted against Developer, the Purchaser, or the City alleging the invalidity of such entitlements. “Regulatory Approvals” means those land use entitlements and utility capacity service agreements required for the Project, including without limitation: grading, demolition and building permits, water and sewer capacity agreements, all to the extent applicable for Developer’s intended development and use of the Property for the Project.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Developer and Purchaser may each waive this condition to Closing in their respective sole discretion; and (d) Developer has exercised its Option to enter into a Lease with respect to the ATC Site, provided that the exercise of the Option may be concurrent with the Close of Escrow at the option of Developer and Purchaser.

15.4 Purchaser agrees to deposit into Escrow the sum of $1,917,665 (One million nine hundred and seventeen thousand and six hundred and sixty-five dollars) on or prior to the Close of Escrow.

15.5 Upon the conditions for Close of Escrow being met, the Escrow Agent shall make payment to the City the amount of $1,917,665 (One million nine hundred and seventeen thousand and six hundred and sixty-five dollars).

15.6 If the Close of Escrow does not occur on or prior to the date that is five (5) years after the Effective Date, then this Agreement shall be terminated and of no further force and effect.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 97 ends

11134.00024/1377758v2
6 16 Closing Costs, Prorations, Possession.

16.1 Purchaser shall pay the premium for any ALTA extended coverage Title Policy, cost of procuring a survey and all requested ALTA survey policy endorsements, and the cost of recording the Deed.

16.2 City shall pay 100% of any documentary or other transfer taxes payable on account of the conveyance of the Property to Purchaser, CLTA standard coverage title policy fees, and the Title Company’s charges and fees which may be charged by the Title Company in connection with the Close of Escrow.

16.3 Purchaser shall be entitled to exclusive possession of the Property immediately upon the Close of Escrow.

16.4 All prorations shall be made in accordance with customary practice in Monterey County, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement. All prorations shall be on an "actual day" basis and a three hundred sixty-five (365) day year.

17. Broker's Commission.

City and Purchaser and Developer each warrant and represent that they have not engaged the services of any agent, finder or broker in connection with the transaction which is the subject of this Agreement, and that they are not liable for any real estate commissions, broker's fees or finder's fees which may accrue by means of the sale of the Property.

18. Notices.

All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing, and shall be personally delivered, sent by reputable overnight courier, or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, and shall be deemed received upon the earlier of: (i) if personally delivered, the date of delivery to the address of the person to receive such notice; (ii) if mailed, three (3) business days after the date of posting by the United States post office; or (iii) if delivered by Federal Express or other overnight courier for next business day delivery, the next business day. Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner described in this Section. Rejection or other refusal to accept or the inability to deliver because of a change in address of which no notice was given shall be deemed to constitute receipt of the notice, demand, request or communication sent. Unless changed in accordance herewith, the addresses for notices given pursuant to this Agreement shall be as follows:

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 98 ends

11134.00024/1377758v2
7 If to City: City of Pacific Grove
300 Forest Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
Attention: City Manager
COPY TO: Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
2310 East Ponderosa Drive, Suite 25
Camarillo, CA 93010
Attention: Brian A. Pierik
Purchaser: Foursome Development Company,
a California general partnership
555 Abrego Street
Monterey, CA 93940
Attention: Michael W. Zimmerman
COPY TO: The Law Offices of Hubbard & Hubbard
400 Camino Aguajito
Monterey, CA 93940
Attention: Alex Hubbard
Developer: CCS Pacific Grove Manager, LLC
3760 Kilroy Airport Way, Suite 130
Long Beach, CA 90806
Attn: Nicholas Long
COPY TO: Lubin Olson & Niewiadomski LLP
The Transamerica Pyramid
600 Montgomery Street, 14th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Attn: Robert Miller

19. Default.

Failure or delay by either party to perform any covenant, condition or provision of this Agreement within the time provided herein constitutes a default under this Agreement. The injured party shall give written notice of default to the party in default, specifying the default complained of. The defaulting party shall immediately commence to cure such default and shall diligently complete such cure within ten (10) days from the date of the notice. The injured party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by written notice to the other party in the event of a default which is not cured within such ten (10) day period. In the event of default by Purchaser or Developer under this Agreement, City waives the right to seek specific performance of Purchaser’s obligation to purchase the Property as provided in this Agreement, or to seek speculative, consequential, contingent or punitive damages, including any claim for lost profits.

City’s remedies in the event of a default by Purchaser or Developer under this Agreement shall be limited to an action at law to recover City’s actual damages incurred by City resulting directly from such default, and the City waives all other remedies, damages and causes of action.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 99 ends

11134.00024/1377758v2
8 20. City’s Repurchase Option.

Purchaser and Developer represent that the purpose of the acquisition of the Property is solely for the benefit of the Project, and acknowledge that City would not agree to convey the Property to Purchaser except in consideration of the benefit of the Project to the City.

Accordingly, Purchaser hereby grants to City an option to repurchase the Property (“Repurchase Option”) on the terms and conditions set forth in this Section. Seller shall be entitled to exercise the Repurchase Option if Developer fails to complete the construction of the Project in substantial conformity with the plans for the Project approved by the City (as such approval may be changed from time to time) within four (4) years from the date on which Developer commences construction of the Project, which date shall be within one year of the City’s issuance of the building permit, subject to Unavoidable Delay. City shall exercise the Repurchase Option by delivering notice to Purchaser of its intent to exercise the Repurchase Option (“Option Notice”). The Option Notice shall describe in reasonable detail the basis for the Option Notice. If City exercises the Repurchase Option, City shall pay to Purchaser for the purchase of the Property an amount equal to the original Compensation less an amount equal to the City’s cost of restoring the Property to its condition immediately prior to the Close of Escrow under this Agreement. Closing Costs shall be allocated as provided in Section 12, except City shall pay the costs allocated to Purchaser, and Purchaser shall pay the costs allocated to City. “Unavoidable Delay” means any delay that is caused by the other party or that is beyond the control of the City, the Developer, or the Purchaser including delay caused by strikes, acts of God, weather, earthquake, tsunami, inability to obtain labor or materials, inability to obtain governmental permits or approvals, moratoria, governmental restrictions, including, but not limited to restrictions in response to a pandemic, epidemic, or contagion, declared state of emergency, civil commotion, fire or other causes beyond the reasonable control of the parties. 21, Entire Agreement.

This Agreement and its exhibits constitute the entire agreement between the Parties hereto pertaining to the subject matter hereof, and the final, complete and exclusive expression of the terms and conditions thereof. All prior agreements, representations, negotiations and understanding of the parties hereto, oral or written, express or implied, are hereby superseded and merged herein.

22. Governing Law.

This Agreement and the exhibits attached hereto have been negotiated and executed in the State of California and shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California without regard to its choice of law principles.

23. Amendments.

No addition to or modification of any provision contained in this Agreement shall be effective unless fully set forth in writing by the Parties.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 100 ends

11134.00024/1377758v2
9 24. Counterparts and Electronic Signatures.

This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, and executed and transmitted electronically, and each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.

25. Binding Upon Successors.

The terms and conditions, covenants, and agreements set forth herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors of the Parties hereof.

26. Cooperation.

Each party agrees to cooperate with the other in the Closing of this transaction and, in that regard, to sign any and all documents which may be reasonably necessary, helpful, or appropriate to carry out the purposes and intent of this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement:

SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 101 ends

11134.00024/1377758v2
City:

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE, a charter city and
municipal corporation
Date: By:

Bill Peake, Mayor
ATTEST:

Sandra Kandell, City Clerk
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 102 ends

11134.00024/1377758v2
11 Date: __________________________
Purchaser:

FOURSOME DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a
California general partnership
By:___________________________
THEODORE J. BALESTRERI
Its: Managing General Partner
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 103 ends

11134.00024/1377758v2
12 Date:_______________________
Developer:

CCS PACIFIC GROVE, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: CCS PACIFIC GROVE MANAGER, LLC
Its Manager
By: CCA MANAGEMENT, LLC
Its Manager
By: _______________________
Name: Nicholas Long
Its: CFO and authorized signatory
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 104 ends

11134.00024/1377758v2
13 Exhibit A
ATC Site
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 105 ends

11134.00024/1377758v2
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 106 ends

11134.00024/1377758v2
15 PGCC 10-16-24

Page 107 ends

11134.00024/1377758v2
EXHIBIT “C”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR OCEAN VIEW AVENUE
(APN )
[to be inserted]
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 108 ends

Agenda No. 11 B

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian Pierik, City Attorney
MEETING DATE: September 18, 2024
SUBJECT: Discussion of American Tin Cannery (ATC) Project; Proposed Resolution Declaring City’s Intent to Vacate Excess Right-Of-Way Located on Portion of Sloat Avenue; Proposed Resolution Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 for Exempt Surplus Land; Proposed Uncodified Ordinance Conditionally Ordering Vacation CEQA: Environmental Impact Report

RECOMMENDATION

1. Motion to adopt Resolution Declaring City’s Intent to Vacate Excess Right-Of-Way Located on Portion of Sloat Avenue as described in Attachment 1;

2. Motion to adopt Resolution Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 for Exempt Surplus Land as described in Attachment 2;

3. Proposed Uncodified Ordinance Conditionally Ordering Vacation as described in Attachment 3:
a. Request the City Attorney read the title of the ordinance:
b. Motion to waive further reading of the ordinance and introduce the Uncodified Ordinance Conditionally Ordering Vacation
c. Direct a summary of a proposed ordinance be published as approved by the City Attorney.

4. Other action related to this agenda item as Council determines appropriate

DISCUSSION
I. MEASURE X
A. April 19, 2016 Election
April 19, 2016, the voters of the City of Pacific Grove at a Special Election approved a voter initiative measure known as “Measure X” (Attachment 4) which had the following statement of finding and purpose:
“SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FINDING AND PURPOSE. The American Tin Cannery (ATC) site is one of the major gateways to Pacific Grove. The current land uses at the ATC site do not provide necessary public revenue to Pacific Grove nor the full range of uses sought by residents or visitors to the adjacent Monterey Bay Aquarium and the Cannery Row vicinity. Without voter authority, the ATC site could not be re-developed with “overnight lodging,” which the Pacific Grove Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan (Land Use Plan) identifies as a “principal permitted use.” The California Coastal Act also establishes “visitor-serving uses,” which include overnight lodging, as priority uses in the California coastal zone. The existing voter approved zoning restrictions allow only the uses allowed in the C-V (Visitor Commercial) and C-2 (Heavy Commercial), but hotels are not allowed. Voter authority is required to enhance the commercial viability of this area and to provide for the uses envisioned in the Land Use Plan and California Coastal Act.”
10/8/24, 2:57 PM Print Agenda Report
https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=5236&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=72243 1/11 PGCC 10-16-24

Page 109 ends

The City zoning code at that time did not allow for hotels, but Measure X included hotels as a use permitted in this zone. Measure X included a proposed Zoning Code Amendment to add Section 23.31.025 to the Pacific Grove Municipal Code. Measure X passed by a vote of 58.83% Yes and 41.17 No.

B. May 16, 2016 – City Council Adopts Ordinance No. 16-009A On May 16, 2016, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 16-009A (Attachment 5) to implement Measure X (C-V-ATC zoning district – American Tin Cannery zoning) and includes the following text for Section

23.31.025:
“(a) Boundaries of District. The C-V-ATC zoning district shall apply to the American Tin Cannery site that is comprised of Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 006-231-001, 006-234-004, and 006-234-005 and that segment of Sloat Avenue that is continuous contiguous to the American Tin Cannery site. (Verified by City File and Sample Voter Ballot.)
(b) Uses Permitted. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Pacific Grove Municipal Code, the following uses shall be permitted in the C-V-ATC zoning district:
(1) Hotels and any accessory uses, such as restaurants, bars and lounges, meeting and event facilities, spa and fitness facilities, parking, and buildings, spaces, and structures incidental to such uses, subject to first securing a use permit.
(2) All uses that are permitted in the C-V zoning district and additional uses permitted by subsequent amendment to the zoning ordinance.
(c) Development Standards. Development standards in the C-V-ATC zoning district, including floor area coverage, density, setbacks and height limits shall be in accordance with the applicable standards set forth in the local Coastal Program Land Use Plan, as updated or amended, or if no such standards are provided in the local coastal Program Land Use Plan, as updated or amended, in accordance with the standards set forth in the use permit or other required permit for a use allowed in the C-V-ATC zoning district. (d) Except as modified by this section, all provisions of the motel/hotel regulation ballot measure enacted by the people at the June 3, 1986, special election, as set out at Chapter 23.52 PGMC, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. [Ord. 16-009A § 1, 2016].” Emphasis added.

As noted, the boundaries of the district included in Ordinance No.16-009A include “that segment of Sloat Avenue that is contiguous to the American Tin Cannery site.” II. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS ON JANUARY 12, 2022
On January 12, 2022, the City Council approved a Coastal Development Permit (CDP), and other permits, for the American Tin Cannery Hotel and Commercial Project The project is located on an approximately 6-acre site just inland of Ocean View Boulevard between Dewey and Eardley.

The City Council adopted the following three Resolutions at its meeting on January 12, 2022:

A. Resolution No. 22-001 (Attachment 6):

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE ADOPTING

ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT,

CERTIFYING THE AMERICAN TIN CANNERY HOTEL AND COMMERCIAL PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH #2019110152), ADOPTING THE MITIGATION

MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING

CONSIDERATIONS
10/8/24, 2:57 PM Print Agenda Report
https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=5236&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=72243 2/11 PGCC 10-16-24

Page 110 ends

Resolution 22-001 includes in Facts and Findings the following description of the Project site:
“2. The Project site is located at 109/125 Ocean View Boulevard and 124 Central Avenue, Pacific Grove, 93950; APNs 006-231-001, 006-234-004, 006-234-005, and 006-234-008, as well as the portion of the Sloat Avenue right-of-way (ROW) between Eardley Avenue and Dewey Avenue and a portion of an existing encroachment along Ocean View Boulevard.” (Emphasis added)
B. Resolution No. 22-002 (Attachment 7):

APPROVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL PERMIT, TREE PERMIT WITH DEVELOPMENT, USE PERMIT, AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AP/TPD/UP/CDP 19-0363 AND GENERAL PLAN

CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR THE VACATION OF THE SLOAT AVENUE EASEMENT TO ALLOW

THE PARTIAL DEMOLITION OF EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS, REMOVAL OF ON-SITE TREES, AND THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE FOR A 225-ROOM HOTEL WITH ASSOCIATED HOTEL AMENITIES INCLUDING THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, 10,968 SQUARE FEET

OF RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES, AND ON-SITE VALET AND SELF-SERVICE PARKING FOR A TOTAL OF 290 CARS. THE PROJECT PROPOSES A TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF 353,489 SQUARE FEET (GROSS FLOOR AREA OF 317,160 SQUARE FEET) ON AN APPROXIMATELY 5.597-ACRE PROJECT SITE PURSUANT TO PGMC §23.31.025, §12.60.010, §23.31.020, AND CHAPTER 23.90, CONTINGENT

ON CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL EIR FOR THE PROJECT
Resolution No. 22-002 includes the following references:
“Fact No. 3: The subject site is located in the C-V-ATC Commercial Visitor-American Tin Cannery (APNs 006-231-001, 006-234-004, and 006-234-005, as well as the portion of the Sloat Avenue ROW between Eardley Avenue and Dewey Avenue) and C-1 Light Commercial (APN 006-234-008) Zoning Districts.” (Emphasis added)
Section 2 of Resolution (page 12):
“2. The City Council finds that the vacation of the Sloat Avenue ROW easement is in conformance with the City’s adopted General Plan.”
Resolution 22-002 includes Exhibits A which contains 77 Conditions of Approval for the Project.

C. Resolution No. 22-003 (Attachment 8)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE CITY’S INTENT TO VACATE EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED ON SLOAT

AVENUE, EXCEPTING AND RESERVING RIGHTS FOR EXISTING PUBLIC UTILITY FACILITIES,

AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION The “Area Proposed for Vacation” as described in Exhibit A to Resolution 22-003 included Sloat Avenue from Eardley Avenue to Dewer Avenue.

After the City adopted the three Resolutions for the Project at its meeting on January 12, 2022, an appeal was filed to the California Coastal Commission of the City’s approval of the Coastal Development Permit by Commissioners Linda Escalante and Caryl Hart, Pacific Grove Coast Watch, Kim Akeman, Thom Akeman, Anthony Ciani, Jane Haines and Michelle Raine.

III. HISTORY REGARDING PROPOSED VACATION OF SLOAT AVENUE IN 2022 10/8/24, 2:57 PM Print Agenda Report
https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=5236&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=72243 3/11 PGCC 10-16-24

Page 111 ends

As noted, on January 12, 2022, the Council adopted Resolution 22-003 which declared the City’s intent to vacate portions of Sloat Avenue and set a date and time for a public hearing on the proposed vacation.

Over time, the “s” in Sloats has been dropped in common usage, and this street is currently known as Sloat Avenue.

A Resolution to Vacate Sloat was brought to the City Council at meetings between February 2, 2022 and May 18, 2022.

On May 18, 2022, the legal description for the portion of Sloat proposed to be vacated in the Resolution submitted to the Council is attached Exhibits A and B to the Resolution (Attachment 9) and the area described is “Being all that right of way of Sloats Avenue lying between Eardley Avenue and Dewey Avenue. Containing an area of 0.61 acres, more or less.” Exhibit B is a sketch which shows by hash marks the “Area Proposed for Vacation” which depicts Sloat Avenue from Eardley Avenue to Dewey Avenue including the area adjacent to Lots 11, 12 and 13.

At the City Council meeting on May 18, 2022, the action taken by the Council was to table the Resolution to Vacate to a date and time uncertain. As May 18, 2022, the Coastal Commission had not yet rendered a decision on the appeal of the Coastal Development Permit for the Project.

IV. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
On March 22, 2024 a Staff Report was issued by the staff of the California Coastal Commission (CCC) for a hearing before the Commission set for April 11, 2024 (Attachment 10). The Staff Report contains 88 pages plus Appendices (Substantive File Documents and Staff Contact with Agencies and Groups) and seven Exhibits and Public Correspondence Received.

A. CCC Conditions
The Staff Report includes five Standard Conditions (page 8) and Special Conditions including: (1) Revised Final Plans; (2) Construction Plan; (3) Marine Wildlife Protection; (4) Public Access Areas and Amenities; (5) Water Use Limits; (6) Provision of Lower-Cost Overnight Accommodations; (7) General Occupancies Requirements; (8) Transportation Demand Management Plan; (9) Plastic Reduction Program; (10) Protection of Archaeological and/or Tribal Cultural Resources; (11) Other Authorizations; (12) City of Pacific Grove Conditions -- Developer is responsible for compliance with all terms of this CDP in addition to any other requirements imposed by the City and in event of a conflict this CDP shall prevail; (13) Future Permitting; (14) Minor Adjustments; (15) Attorneys Fees – Developer to reimburse CCC for attorney fees and (16) Deed Restriction.

B. Deed Restriction
The Deed Restriction in Special Condition 16 reads as follows:
“16. Deed Restriction. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE CDP, the Permittee shall submit to the Executive Director for review and written approval documentation demonstrating that the landowners have executed and recorded against the properties governed by this CDP (i.e., APNs 006-231-001, 006-234-004, 006-234- 005, 006-234-008, and the portion of Sloat Avenue between Eardley Avenue and Dewey Avenue) a deed restriction, in a form and content acceptable to the Executive Director indicating that, pursuant to this CDP, the California Coastal Commission has authorized development on the subject property, subject to terms and conditions that restrict the use and enjoyment of that property, and that such terms and conditions shall be imposed as covenants, conditions and restrictions on the use and enjoyment of the property. The deed restriction shall include a legal description of all of the properties governed by this CDP. The deed restriction shall also indicate that, in the event of an extinguishment or termination of the deed restriction for any reason, the terms and conditions of this CDP shall continue to restrict the use and enjoyment of the subject property so long as either this CDP or the development it authorizes – or any part, modification, or amendment thereof – remains in 10/8/24, 2:57 PM Print Agenda Report
https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=5236&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=72243 4/11 PGCC 10-16-24

Page 112 ends

existence on or with respect to the subject property.” (Emphasis Added) As noted, the Deed Restriction must be in a form and content acceptable to the Executive Director of the CCC and provide that the development of the property is subject to the terms and conditions of the CCC authorization. The property subject to the Deed Restriction includes the portion of Sloat Avenue between Eardley Avenue and Dewey Avenue.

C. Public Parking and Public Street Space
The CCC Staff Report (pages 82 to 83) addresses the subject of public parking and the use of public street space:
“And Special Condition 4 similarly codifies the proposed public access amenities via a Public Access Management Plan, with provisions to ensure that such amenities (e.g., the public park, living roof, and public restroom) are clearly identified on final plans, adequately signed to alert the public of these spaces, include appropriate amenities to aid in their enjoyment (e.g., benches, picnic tables, and trash cans), and maintained over time to maximize their use and utility in this regard.

That being said, the proposed project does materially affect public parking and the use of public street space.

The project still proposes to convert portions of the existing Sloat Avenue public street to private hotel use.

Doing so will result in the loss of some 20,000 square feet of publicly owned space, 17 parking spaces along the street (along with an additional 7 spaces lost along Dewey and Eardley Avenues due to curb cuts, driveways, and similar measures to access the proposed hotel), as well as its sidewalk space and corresponding ability for the public to easily walk between Eardley and Dewey Avenues. The project also proposes to encroach into the Ocean View Boulevard right-of-way with an elevated sidewalk that will be privately owned but open to public use, totaling some roughly 3,000 square feet. While the Ocean View Boulevard encroachment can be addressed through conditions that clearly state that such elevated walkway is to remain open and available for public use without obstruction (and Special Condition 1(a) does just this), the Sloat Avenue and public parking impacts require more evaluation. The privatization of this area represents both a direct, quantifiable impact, (Footnote) 66 including direct loss of parking spaces, as well as a more intangible loss of public space to private use that is difficult to fully quantify. Public space of any type, particularly so close to the ocean and prime visitor-serving uses, is a valuable common resource that must be protected, or, at a minimum, sufficiently mitigated. While one way to address this issue is through alternative siting and design that eliminates the privatization of this street, including eliminating it from hotel use (and instead having elevated walkways above the street to connect ‘wings’ on either street side, as is done with some structures along Cannery Row) and thereby avoiding the impact in the first place, another way is to ensure that the public utility of the street space is fully mitigated.

The Applicant proposes to mitigate for the loss of parking by adding six on-street spaces (through elimination of existing driveways that serve the existing ATC site), and providing 20 new spaces in a new paid public lot at 124 Central Avenue. The end result will be a net gain of 2 spaces. And while this is true, it’s also true that the public is losing sidewalk space, that the new spaces will be located further away and not as close to area amenities, and that the public’s real estate is lost. The on-street parking around the ATC site represents some of the closest, low-cost parking for visitors to the Monterey Bay Aquarium and Monterey Bay Coastal Trail. To access the coast, visitors who park in the public lot on 124 Central Avenue will have to traverse around the ATC hotel and downhill from Central Avenue. This represents an even greater barrier for visitors with ADA-needs. (Footnote) 67 In short, the Applicant’s public parking proposal does not have the same utility nor access to the coastline as the on-street parking spaces that will be removed around the ATC site, and thus does not sufficiently mitigate for the impact.

To do so, Special Condition 4(d) requires the 20 spaces in the public lot to be free for 6 hours a day subject to a 3-hour maximum stay for any one vehicle (and ADA spaces free all day and not subject to such restrictions).

This requirement recognizes that the utility of these spaces isn’t as high as the status quo, and thus to make up the difference, the spaces are free of charge during this time frame. Along with the fact that there is a net 10/8/24, 2:57 PM Print Agenda Report
https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=5236&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=72243 5/11 PGCC 10-16-24

Page 113 ends

increase in public parking overall, the finding can be made that parking and public space impacts from Sloat Avenue’s conversion to private use are appropriately mitigated in this way. To further ensure that the project addresses traffic and multi-modal transportation requirements, Special Condition 8 requires the preparation of a Transportation Demand Management Plan that requires, among other things, ride sharing programs and transit passes to reduce single-occupant car trips for workers, as well as shuttles and free bikes for guests to accomplish same.

As proposed and as conditioned, the project meets the LCP’s requirements for public view and public access protection and provision overall, as well as the specific directives for this specific site. It also adequately mitigates for the project’s impacts to public streets. The end result is a project that should be a measurable improvement over the status quo and one worthy of this prime coastal setting.” Footnote 66 referenced in the above quoted passage from the CCC Staff Report appears at the bottom page 82 and reads:
“66 As part of the City’s street right-of-way vacation efforts, the appraised value of the roughly 20,000 square feet of road space that would be sold to the Applicant was valued at roughly $2 million, or about $200 per square foot (as of December 2021). The City has not yet sold the street, pending resolution of the Commission’s action on this CDP.”
Footnote 67 referenced in the above quoted passage from the CCC Staff Report appears at the bottom page 83 and reads
“67 It should also be noted that the on-street parking spaces located on Ocean View Boulevard, Eardley Avenue, Dewey Avenue, and Sloat Avenue are authorized by a Commission-issued CDP (3-04-027) that allows the City to operate a metered parking program that includes a 2-hour time restriction for 31 parking spaces on Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard between 9am and 6pm, consistent with other 2-hour parking areas within the City (i.e., at Lover’s Point). Any changes proposed to the on-street parking spaces on these streets must obtain an amendment to the CDP, for which the City must apply.” D. CCC Conclusion
The CCC Staff Report closes at page 88 with the following statement:
“The Commission’s review, analysis, and decision-making process for CDPs and CDP amendments has been certified by the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency as being the functional equivalent of the environmental review required by CEQA (CCR Section 15251(f)). Accordingly, in fulfilling that review, this report has analyzed the relevant coastal resource issues with the proposal, has addressed comments received, and has identified appropriate and necessary modifications to address adverse impacts to such coastal resources. The Commission finds that only as modified and conditioned herein will the proposed project avoid significant adverse effects on the environment within the meaning of CEQA. Thus, the proposed project as modified will not result in any significant environmental effects for which feasible mitigation measures have not been employed, consistent with CEQA Section 21080.5(d)(2)(A).” E. April 3, 2024 City Council Meeting Regarding CCC Proposed Action On April 3, 2024, there was an Agenda Report submitted to the City Council by Interim City Manager Robert Perrault (Attachment 11) recommending that the Council direct the Mayor to provide written comment to the CCC in support of the revised ATC project as described in the CCC Staff Report for the April 11, 2024 hearing before the CCC. Mr. Perrault includes the following information:
“The revised project has been agreed to by the applicants and includes the following key elements:

1. Reduction in rooms from 225 to 206
10/8/24, 2:57 PM Print Agenda Report
https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=5236&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=72243 6/11 PGCC 10-16-24

Page 114 ends

2. Reduction in size by 85,000 sq. ft.

3. Reduction in retail space

4. Includes a new public park and planned viewing area.

5. Direct access to a rooftop green area.

6. Public restroom.

7. The reduced scope addresses the water supply concern.

8. Provide lower-cost rooms for 18 rooms on a first come first served basis.

9. Construction of a 16 unit/64 bed group wing with 300 bed nights reserved for use by certain special needs youth groups.

Recommended conditions of approval of the revised project address:

1. Water Supply

2. Low-Cost Accommodations

3. Public Views/Community Character and Public Access

4. Habitat Resources

5. Archaeological/Cultural Resources”
At the April 3, 2024 City Council meeting, the Council authorized Mayor Peake to send a letter to the CCC in support of the revised ATC project as described in the CCC Staff Report.

On April 4, 2024, Mayor Peake sent a letter to the CCC (Attachment 12) stating:
“The City has reviewed Th15b-4-4024 report (3/22/24) containing a revised project description and Staff Report Substantial Issue & CDP Determinations and supports both the revised project and Commission staff recommendation.”
F. Notice of Intent to Issue Coastal Development Permit The CCC issued a Notice of Intent to Issue Coastal Development Permit (Rev. May 20, 2024) which is Attachment 13. This Notice includes 16 Special Conditions that were set forth the CCC Staff Report for the April 11, 2024 hearing (Attachment 10).

G. September 6. 2024 Emails Between City Manager and CCC

1. City Manager Email to CCC
On September 6, 2024, City Manager Matt Mogensen sent an email to the CCC regarding Sloat Avenue which reads (Attachment 14):

Ms. Katie Butler and Kevin Kahn:

Attached for reference is the California Coastal Commission (CCC) Staff Report of April 11, 2024 (“Report”) regarding Appeal Number A-3-PGR-22-004. At page 82 of the Report (see yellow highlight), there is a statement that “…the Sloat Avenue and public parking impacts require more evaluation." On page 83 of the Report, there is this statement (highlighted): “In short, the Applicant’s public parking proposal does not have the same utility nor access to the coastline as the on-street parking spaces that will be removed around the ATC site, and thus does not sufficiently mitigate for the impact.” The Report at page 83 continues with a discussion about Special Condition 4(d) and Special Condition 8 and then there is this statement (highlight):
“As proposed and as conditioned, the project meets the LCP’s requirements for public view and public access protection and provision overall, as well as the specific directives for this specific site. It also adequately 10/8/24, 2:57 PM Print Agenda Report
https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=5236&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=72243 7/11 PGCC 10-16-24

Page 115 ends

mitigates for the project’s impacts to public streets. The end result is a project that should be a measurable improvement over the status quo and one worthy of this prime coastal setting.” In addition, we note that Section 16 of the CCC Conditions on page 25 of the Report reference a deed restriction and state that includes:
“PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE CDP, the Permittee shall submit to the Executive Director for review and written approval documentation demonstrating that the landowners have executed and recorded against the properties governed by this CDP (i.e., APNs 006-231-001, 006-234-004, 006-234-005, 006-234-008, and the portion of Sloat Avenue between Eardley Avenue and Dewey Avenue) a deed restriction, in a form and content acceptable to the Executive Director indicating that, pursuant to this CDP, the California Coastal Commission has authorized development on the subject property, subject to terms and conditions that restrict the use and enjoyment of that property, and that such terms and conditions shall be imposed as covenants, conditions and restrictions on the use and enjoyment of the property. The deed restriction shall include a legal description of all of the properties governed by this CDP. The deed restriction shall also indicate that, in the event of an extinguishment or termination of the deed restriction for any reason, the terms and conditions of this CDP shall continue to restrict the use and enjoyment of the subject property so long as either this CDP or the development it authorizes - or any part, modification, or amendment thereof-·· remains in existence on or with respect to the subject property.”
The City is being requested by the developer to vacate a portion of Sloat Avenue (legal description and plat attached). Based on our review of the Report, including the language at pages 82 and 83 of the Report, it is our understanding that the CCC has no issues with the City considering the vacation of Sloat as requested by the developer provided that the developer complies with all the conditions imposed by the City and the conditions (Standard and Special) imposed by the Coastal Commission in the Report and with all mitigation measures in the EIR. It is understood that in the event of a conflict between any the City Conditions and the CCC Conditions that the CCC Conditions will prevail.

If the CCC has any issues with the City considering the vacation of Sloat as requested by the developer, please contact me at your earliest convenience.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Thank you.

Matt Mogensen
City Manager

2. Reply by CCC to City Manager
Kevin Kahn responded to the September 6, 2024 email from Mr. Mogensen later that afternoon stating (Attachment 14):
“Hi Matthew, thanks for reaching out. I’m not sure we’ve officially met yet, so also nice to e-meet you as well! To your question, yes, the Commission’s CDP approval provides the requisite authorization under the Coastal Act and LCP to use a portion of Sloat Avenue in a different way (i.e., from public street use to hotel use). The findings and conditions you cite below provide the justification for doing so, including via mitigation in the Central Avenue parking lot. So from a Coastal Act/LCP/CDP perspective, it’s covered in this regard. That said, other non-Coastal Act/LCP issues, like payment, are within the City’s discretion to determine.” Hope that helps, and don’t hesitate with any other questions.

Kevin Kahn
10/8/24, 2:57 PM Print Agenda Report
https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=5236&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=72243 8/11 PGCC 10-16-24

Page 116 ends

District Manager
Central Coast District Office
V. PETITION FILED BY PACIFIC GROVE COAST WATCH AND ANTHONY CIANI On February 9, 2022, Pacific Grove Coast Watch and Anthony Ciani (“Petitioners”) filed a Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief; CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (“CEQA”) ACTION (Attachment 15), “Lawsuit”. The Respondents in this Petition were the City of Pacific Grove and the Pacific Grove City Council.

The Petition alleged that the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Project adopted mitigation measures to reduce the environmental impacts of the Project. However, the Petition alleged, the EIR is lacking in critical aspects and thus fails to properly analyze the environmental impact of the Project. See Petition at Paragraph 2.

The Petition acknowledges that that “…the project includes the City’s vacation of Sloat Avenue so as to permit private hotel development on this now-public street.” (Paragraph 21 of Petition).

The Parties to this Lawsuit agreed to a stay pending the result of the action by the CCC on the appeal of the CDP.

On May 29, 2024, following the action of the CCC taken on April 11, 2024 (as described above), the Petitioners filed a dismissal of the Lawsuit (Attachment 16).

VI. PROPOSED COUNCIL ACTIONS
A. Proposed Actions
There are three actions proposed for City Council consideration at its meeting on September 18, 2024:

1. Motion to adopt Resolution Declaring City’s Intent to Vacate Excess Right-Of-Way Located on Portion of Sloat Avenue (Attachment 1);

2. Motion to adopt Resolution Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 for Exempt Surplus Land (Attachment 2);

3. Proposed Uncodified Ordinance Conditionally Ordering Vacation (Attachment 3) B. Area of Sloat proposed to be vacated.

1. Previous Area Proposed for Vacation
As noted, the area of Sloat Avenue which was proposed to be vacated on January 12, 2022 included Sloat Avenue from Eardley Avenue to Dewey Avenue in the Resolution 2022-003 (Notice of Intent to Vacate – Attachment 8).

On May 18, 2022, the proposed Resolution to Vacate (Attachment 9) included as a legal description Exhibit A which “Being all that right of way of Sloats Avenue lying between Eardley Avenue and Dewey Avenue.

2. Current Area Proposed for Vacation
The developer has provided the City will a revised legal description for the area proposed of Sloat to be vacated (Attachment 16) which is attached as Exhibits to the proposed Resolution Declaring Intent to Vacate (Attachment 1), the proposed Resolution relating to Surplus Property (Attachment 2) and the Proposed Ordinance (Attachment 3).
10/8/24, 2:57 PM Print Agenda Report
https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=5236&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=72243 9/11 PGCC 10-16-24

Page 117 ends

The revised legal description for the proposed area to be vacated is approximately .45 acres (approximately 19,602 square feet) as compared to the .61 acres (approximately 26,778 square feet) proposed to be vacated in 2022. As shown in the sketch included in Attachment 1, the proposed area to be vacated does not include the area of Sloat Avenue adjacent to Lots 11, 12 and 13 (Remainder of Sloat Avenue). The Remainder of Sloat Avenue is not necessary for the Project.

C. Conditions on Effective Date of Proposed Ordinance
There are six conditions which must be satisfied before the Proposed Ordinance would be become effective after the Ordinance is adopted as follows:

1. Developer of the ATC Development (the “Developer”) has submitted a plan or plans for utility relocation and maintenance (including the temporary protection or provision for utility connection to adjacent properties throughout the course of construction) of existing public and private utilities, including but not limited to fiber optics owned by the Monterey Bay Aquarium Foundation, which is approved by the City and the appropriate utility; and

2. The City and Developer have entered into a legally binding agreement (the “Agreement”) for the conveyance of the City’s interest in the land underlying the existing easement. If the City and Developer do not enter into such agreement within ninety (90) days of the date of adoption of this ordinance, this ordinance will be null and void; and

3. The City has to its reasonable satisfaction determined that the existing rights of the property owners in the vicinity of the Excess Right-of-Way, including the right to access, use, and develop their parcels now and in the future, consistent with state and local law, have been maintained or an alternative arrangement has been made consistent with the terms of the ATC Development approvals, including CEQA and applicable mitigation measures.

4. Pursuant to the Agreement the City’s interest in the land underlying the Excess Right-of-Way has been conveyed from the City to the Developer; and

5. This ordinance has been recorded by the City Clerk with the Monterey County Recorder following the Close of Escrow, as that term is defined in the Agreement, and the City’s interest in the underlying property has been quit claimed from the City to the Developer.

6. The passage of thirty (30) days following the adoption of this ordinance in accordance with Article 15 of the City Charter.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City Council certified the Environmental Impact Report for the ATC Hotel Project by Resolution 22- 001 on January 12, 2022.

OPTIONS
FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The City will receive compensation from the developer for the portion of Sloat Avenue which is being vacated pursuant to an Agreement that is currently being drafted and is expected to be presented to the City Council at its meeting on October 16, 2024.

FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA:Not Applicable.
10/8/24, 2:57 PM Print Agenda Report
https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=5236&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=72243 10/11 PGCC 10-16-24

Page 118 ends

Attachments
Written public comment
Written public comment
Staff PPT 1
Staff PPT 2
ATTACHMENT 1 RESO 24-___ Intent to Vacate Sloat
ATTACHMENT 2 RESO Exempt Surplus Re Sloat
ATTACHMENT 3 ORD - Ordinance Ordering Vacation of Sloat ATTACHMENT 4 MEASURE X FROM VOTER GUIDE PAGE 4
ATTACHMENT 5 ORDINANCE 16-009A
ATTACHMENT 6 RESO 22-001 EIR Certification and CEQA Findings Reso ATTACHMENT 7 22-002 ATC Hotel Project Approval CC Reso
ATTACHMENT 8 22-003 Intent to Vacate Sloat Reso
ATTACHMENT 9 5-18-22 Proposed Resolution to Vacate
ATTACHMENT 10 4780_ATC_Coastal_Commission_4.11.24
ATTACHMENT 11 4-3-24 AR
ATTACHMENT 12 4-4-24 Council Support Letter to Coastal Comission re ATC ATTACHMENT 13 ATC Notice of Intent to Issue Coastal Permit Attachment 14 - September 6, 2024 Emails Between City Manager and CCC ATTACHMENT 15 Petition and Complaint (w- summons)
ATTACHMENT 16 Request for Dismissal
10/8/24, 2:57 PM Print Agenda Report
https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=5236&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=72243 11/11 PGCC 10-16-24

Page 119 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 120 ends

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 121 ends

4858-9184-1251v1 A-1
Exhibit A
Legal Description and Depiction
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 122 ends

4858-9184-1251v1 B-1
Exhibit B
Plot Depiction
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 123 ends

City of Pacific Grove
Appraisal of Portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard Owner – City of Pacific Grove
Memorandum Addendum
Date: December 17, 2021
To: Anastazia Aziz, AICP – Community Development Director From: Erik Woodhouse, MAI, R/W-AC – AR/WS
Re: Appraisal Report No. 20038B
Addendum to Appraisal Reports No. 20038 and 20038A
Owner: City of Pacific Grove
Portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard, Pacific Grove, CA Background
Erik Woodhouse, MAI, R/W-AC of Associated Right of Way Services (AR/WS) appraised the above-referenced property October 7, 2020 with a date of value of July 2, 2020 (ARWS Appraisal Report No. 20038) and also issued a related memorandum pertaining to ground lease rates affecting the subject property with the same date of value (ARWS Appraisal Report No. 20038A).

The purpose of the original assignment was to furnish an opinion of the market value of property rights within portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard, which are proposed to be incorporated into a planned hotel development on adjacent parcels. The purpose of the subsequent assignment (20038A) was to provide an estimate of the market ground lease rate of return for the interests previously appraised be provided.

Since that time, the City of Pacific Grove has requested a revised appraisal to reflect a more current date of valuation and that the City no longer seeks to ground lease the property interests to the developer but rather to convey them in fee. This memorandum addendum is intended to be attached to the prior two reports referenced above original report and incorporates the content and conclusions of those reports by reference. This memorandum can only be relied upon by the intended users of the previous reports.

I have prepared this Memorandum Addendum and updated the appraisal work file, which collectively meets the reporting requirements for this appraisal assignment in accordance with the requirements of Standard 2 of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP).

Advisory Opinion 3 in USPAP further states that a new report is not required to have the same level of detail as the original report as long as the new report incorporates by reference specified information/analyses from the prior report, so that, in combination, the referenced portions and the latest information/analysis added satisfies the applicable reporting requirements. This option can be used if the original appraiser’s firm and the original client/intended user(s) involved are the same since the prior reports were issued. If at any time the client/intended user requires a copy of the original appraisal, one will be provided upon request, as the original report is necessary to understand the analysis provided in this document.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 124 ends

City of Pacific Grove
Appraisal of Portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard Owner – City of Pacific Grove
1 Summary of Salient Facts and Conclusions
Sloat Avenue
Right of Way
Ocean View Boulevard
Right of Way
$1,917,665 $343,324
Date of Valuation: December 14, 2021 (date of most recent site visit) Assessor's Parcel Number: N/A, portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard Right of Way
Property Location/Address: Portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard, Pacific Grove, CA
Owner: City of Pacific Grove
Owned Since: Over 5 Years
Occupied By: Public Streets and Sidewalks
Principal Improvements: N/A – Right of Way
Total Site Area:

Portion of Sloat Avenue: 26,778 square feet
Portion of Ocean View Boulevard: 3,190 square feet
Zoning: No zoning designation, portion of public right of way.

Zoning of adjacent parcels: C-V-ATC – Visitor
Commercial – American Tin Cannery
General Plan: No General Plan designation, portion of public right of way. General Plan designation of adjacent parcels:

Central Eardley Commercial
Highest and Best Use
As If Vacant: Assembly with adjacent parcels for development of hospitality and supporting uses
As Improved: Assembly with adjacent parcels for development of hospitality and supporting uses
Flood Hazard Information: Flood Zone X, Map No. 06053C0307H, dated June 21, 2017
Earthquake Information: Not located in an Earthquake Fault Zone PGCC 10-16-24

Page 125 ends

City of Pacific Grove
Appraisal of Portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard Owner – City of Pacific Grove
2 Purpose of the Appraisal
The purpose of this appraisal is to furnish an opinion of the current market value of property rights within portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard, which are proposed to be incorporated into a planned hotel development on adjacent parcels.

Scope of Assignment
I initially inspected the subject property on July 2, 2020, to determine the size, condition, and utility of the underlying land and existing conditions. Since the value of the interests in the areas being appraised is in assembly with the adjacent parcels, Monterey County APNs 006-231-001; -234- 004; and -234-005, which together with the areas being appraised are proposed for development, the adjoining parcels were also inspected at that time. My colleague, Joe Castellanos, reinspected the subject property and provided photographs to assist in determining whether conditions had changed since the previous inspection. Searches of public records, real estate listings and sales services were employed to obtain relevant data. Analysis of market conditions was completed, both general and specific to the market. Market participants were interviewed.

Relevant property sales were researched and confirmed to the extent possible. The data is set out in the property valuation section.

The Appraisal Report conforms to Standards Rule 2-2(a) of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The information contained in this report is specific to the needs of the client and for the intended use stated in this report. I am not responsible for unauthorized use of this report. The intent of this report is to provide sufficient data and analysis so as to have no misleading information and a conclusion of value of high reliability.

Date of Valuation
The property in this report has been valued as of December 14, 2021, the date of the most recent site inspection.

Summary of Changes to Analysis
For the purpose of this memorandum, market data has been analyzed for the purpose of providing a current market valuation of the fee simple interest in the areas to be sold by the City of Pacific Grove. All other elements of the previous appraisal reports remain the same and are incorporated herein by reference.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 126 ends

City of Pacific Grove
Appraisal of Portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard Owner – City of Pacific Grove
3 Certification of Appraiser
I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

I have personally inspected the property that is the subject of this report, and my colleague, Joe Castellanos, more recently reinspected the subject property and provided photographic evidence.

The statements of fact contained in the appraisal report are true and correct, and the information upon which the opinions expressed therein are based is correct; subject to the Limiting Conditions therein set forth.

Neither my employment nor my compensation for completing this assignment is in any way contingent upon the values reported herein. My compensation is not contingent upon the developing or reporting of predetermined values or direction in value that favors the cause of the Client, the amounts of the value opinions, the attainment of a stipulated result or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal.

I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved.

I previously appraised the subject property twice for the same client and same project. The report references are AR/WS Appraisal Nos. 20038 and 20038A. This memorandum addendum has been prepared with the intent of being attached to the prior reports. I have performed no other services as an Appraiser or in any other capacity regarding the property that is the subject of this report within a three-year period immediately preceding the acceptance of this assignment.

I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment.

The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported Assumptions and Limiting Conditions, and are my own personal, impartial, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions.

The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report, to the best of my knowledge and belief, has been prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute, which includes the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP).

The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. As of the date of this report, I have completed the continuing education program for Designated Members of the Appraisal Institute.

The opinion of market value for the subject property as of the date of valuation is set forth in the Summary of Salient Facts and Conclusions and is based upon my independent appraisal and the exercise of professional judgment.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 127 ends

City of Pacific Grove
Appraisal of Portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard Owner – City of Pacific Grove
4 Joe Castellanos provided assistance with the most recent reinspection of the subject property.

No one else provided significant real property assistance to the person signing this Certification.

I hereby certify that my opinion of the market value of the property appraised as described in this report is included herein and that my opinions and conclusions were made subject to the Assumptions and Limiting Conditions in this report and without collusion, coercion or direction from anyone as to value.

December 17, 2021
Date Erik Woodhouse, MAI, R/W-AC
State Certified General Appraiser
CA License No. AG034630
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 128 ends

City of Pacific Grove
Appraisal of Portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard Owner – City of Pacific Grove
5 Updated Extraordinary Assumptions
Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP 2020/2021 edition: Definitions) defines extraordinary assumptions as follows:
“EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTION: an assignment-specific assumption as of the effective date regarding uncertain information used in an analysis which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser’s opinions or conclusions.

Comment: Uncertain information might include physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the subject property; or conditions external to the property, such as market conditions or trends; or about the integrity of data used in an analysis.” In addition to the hypothetical condition previously stated in the prior appraisal reports, the following extraordinary assumptions are used for this appraisal and may affect the assignment results:
• The underlying fee ownership of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard is not definitively known as the date of this report. It is an extraordinary assumption of this report that the underlying fee interests in the subject areas being appraised are owned by the City of Pacific Grove
• The developer of the proposed project will be responsible for any necessary relocation of utilities within Sloat Avenue as a condition of development approval. Based on figures provided by the City of Pacific Grove Public Works Director in 2020, the cost to relocate the utilities is around $275,000. This estimate is assumed to remain reasonably accurate for the purpose of this new assignment.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 129 ends

City of Pacific Grove
Appraisal of Portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard Owner – City of Pacific Grove
6 Updated Real Estate Market Conditions
For more than a year, the world has been dealing with the spread of the coronavirus, COVID-19, and the resulting global pandemic. During the initial stages of the outbreak, the economy experienced a significant downturn, with most major markets declining by as much as 20%. With over half of Californians vaccinated, most COVID-19 related restrictions were lifted in mid-June throughout the state. The progression of COVID-19 continued with a reemergence (Delta variant), and recently, a new wave of uncertainty has arisen due to the rapidly-spreading Omicron variant of the virus. However, the local economy has shown its resilience and the forecast over the longterm is considered favorable, according to market participants.

At the onset of the pandemic, the real gross domestic product (GDP) decreased at an annual rate of 31.4% in the second quarter of 2020, after a decline of 5.0% in the first quarter, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). Real GDP is a comprehensive measure of economic activity, and the most popular indicator of the nation's overall economic health. The most devastating three-month collapse on record in the second quarter of 2020 wiped away nearly five years of growth, as consumers cut back spending, businesses pared investments and global trade dried up, according to the Commerce Department.

Fortunately, though, a recovery started in the following quarter, as third quarter (Q3) 2020 GDP increased at an annual rate of 33.4%, which recovered two-thirds of the economic output lost during the first half of the year. This brought the economy back within only 3.5 percentage points below its pre-pandemic level (see graph above). GDP for Q1 2021 increased 6.3%, Q2 2021 increased by 6.7% and according to the "advanced" estimate released by BEA, the rate for Q3 2021 GDP increased by 2.0%.

Economic activity boomed to start 2021, as widespread vaccinations and government spending helped get the U.S. closer to where it was before the COVID-19 pandemic struck, according to the Commerce Department. The increase in Q2 2021 GDP reflected the continued economic PGCC 10-16-24

Page 130 ends

City of Pacific Grove
Appraisal of Portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard Owner – City of Pacific Grove
7 recovery, reopening of establishments, and the current unending government response related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The BEA states that “GDP in the third quarter reflected increases in private inventory investment, personal consumption expenditures (PCE), state and local government spending, and nonresidential fixed investment that were partly offset by decreases in residential fixed investment, federal government spending, and exports”.

The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index (CCI) is a barometer of the health of the U.S. economy from the perspective of the consumer. The index is based on consumer’s perceptions of current business and employment conditions, as well as their six-month outlook regarding business conditions, employment conditions, and income. The CCI declined for several months during the summer of 2021 and has remained relatively level over the last two months. As of November 2021, the Index now stands at 109.5, whereas 100 is the benchmark. At the start of the pandemic, the CCI was at 118.8, but then decreased to 85.7 in April 2020. Consumers’ assessment of current conditions and their short-term outlook improved significantly in the first part of 2021, as renewed optimism boosted purchasing intentions for big-ticket items. According to the Conference Board, confidence levels suggest the economic expansion will continue into early 2022. However, both confidence and spending will likely face headwinds from rising prices and a potential resurgence of COVID-19 in the coming months.

The unemployment rate is the most frequently cited indicator of labor market health and data from the job market gives the picture of a weakened economy that is recovering from the effects of COVID-19 (see following graphic). The national unemployment rate has been on a downward trajectory, with only a couple slight upward blips, after having spiked to 14.7% when 870,000 jobs were lost in March 2020, followed by a record 20.5 million in April, with much of the U.S. in selfimposed shutdown mode to prevent the spread of COVID-19. The unemployment rate in April was the highest since the BLS started recording the monthly rate in 1948. The last time American joblessness was that severe was the Great Depression, when the unemployment rate peaked at

24.9% in 1933, according to historical annual estimates from the BLS.

The improvements in the labor market starting in May 2020 reflect the continued resumption of economic activity that had been curtailed in March and April in efforts to contain COVID-19. For October 2021, Nonfarm payroll employment increased in 25 states and the District of Columbia PGCC 10-16-24

Page 131 ends

City of Pacific Grove
Appraisal of Portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard Owner – City of Pacific Grove
8 and was essentially unchanged in 25 states. The U.S. unemployment rate fell minimally over the month to 4.6%, however, despite being down considerably from their highs in April 2020, they remain above their levels prior to COVID-19 (3.5% and 5.7 million, respectively, in February 2020). The unemployment rate (not seasonally adjusted) in Santa Cruz County was 4.9% for November 2021, which compares with an unemployment rate of 5.4% for California for the same period.

Hospitality Market
According to a recent report from Costar.com, the occupancy rate in the San Jose/Santa Cruz hotel market collapsed to 17.7% in April of 2020, shortly after the onset of the global pandemic that would severely impact the hospitality sector across the United States. But with the low point of the pandemic now in the past, conditions are improving. Around 640,000 rooms were sold in the month of October, a 32.4% increase compared to the same month the year prior.

Locally, the 12-month RevPAR in the San Jose/Santa Cruz hotel market decreased by 18.6% as of October, which is a sharp contrast to the national statistical data, where RevPAR is up by

26.5% on a year over year basis. Roughly 2,300 new hotel rooms across 17 projects are currently under construction. This new supply follows a material amount of recent development: in the past three years, 25 projects containing around 3,700 rooms were completed market-wide, driving a significant expansion of the existing inventory in percentage terms.1 Source – San Jose/Santa Cruz Hospitality Market Report December 2021 1 San Jose/Santa Cruz Hospitality Market Report December 2021 PGCC 10-16-24

Page 132 ends

City of Pacific Grove
Appraisal of Portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard Owner – City of Pacific Grove
9 Source – San Jose/Santa Cruz Hospitality Market Report December 2021 Source – San Jose/Santa Cruz Hospitality Market Report December 2021 PGCC 10-16-24

Page 133 ends

City of Pacific Grove
Appraisal of Portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard Owner – City of Pacific Grove
10 Sales Comparison Approach
Research was conducted to find comparable land sales in the subject’s market area.

No new sales were found that could shed light on the land value of the adjacent parcels since the issuance of the previous appraisal reports. Comparable L-01 from the previous appraisal reports closed in June of 2020 for the reported contract price of $3,000,000. The following table depicts the comparable sales, with a revised comparable data sheet for Comparable L-01 on the following page. Further data on the remaining sales are incorporated from the previous appraisal reports by reference herein.

Sales Data Summary
Land Sales Data
Address
No. City, State
APN
L-01 518 Lighthouse Ave
Pacific Grove, CA
L-02 601-605 Lighthouse Ave
Monterey, CA
L-03 a. 148 15th Ave
Pacific Grove, CA
03/12/20
b.

Mar-19 0.78 C-1-T $4,200,000
Pacific Grove, CA 03/12/20 33,877 Downtown Commercial
006-173-002
Total Consideration 0.97 C-D & C-1-T Fully entitled $8,400,000 42,277 Downtown Commercial
L-04
Pacific Grove, CA
006-173-003
Assemblage Parcels: DOV
North and South Sides of TBD N/A
Sloat Avenue 194,735
Pacific Grove, CA Total Area
006-231-001; 006-234-004 & -005 Three Parcels

4.47 All available, including water
allocation
C-V-ATC Unentitled
Central Eardley Commercial
$4,200,000
8,400
$1,175,000
02/28/20 6,000 $195.83
$3,000,000
$198.02
Jan-20
06/22/20

0.35 15,150
C-D
Downtown Commercial
Fully entitled
All available except water rights
(to be separately purchased)
Planned Community Unentitled
Sales Price
$/Sq. Ft. (Land)
Entitlements
Utilities
Sales
Contract Date
Parcel Size
(Acres)
Parcel Size
(Sq. Ft.)
Zoning
COE General Plan
Commercial All available, including water
allocation
C-D
006-178-009
001-066-007
006-174-003; -011; -012
Fully entitled
Downtown Commercial All available except water rights
(to be separately purchased)
C-1-T Unentitled
Oct-19 0.14
Mar-19 0.19
Sep-15 0.58
Downtown Commercial All available, including water
allocation
09/14/15
SWC Central Ave. &
Fountain Ave. Fully entitled
All available except water rights
(to be separately purchased)
All available except water rights
(to be separately purchased)
$198.69
NWC Lighthouse Ave. &
Fountain Ave. $5,900,000
25,341 $232.82
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 134 ends

City of Pacific Grove
Appraisal of Portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard Owner – City of Pacific Grove
11 Comparable Land Sale Data Sheet – L-01
Sales Contract Date Jan-20
COE 06/22/20
Sales Price $3,000,000
Address 518 Lighthouse Ave
City, State Pacific Grove, CA
Zip 93950
APN 006-178-009
Buyer
Seller
Document #
Terms
Parcel Size (Acres)
Parcel Size (Sq. Ft.)
$/Sq. Ft. (Land)
Zoning
General Plan
Utilities
Entitlements
Verified By
Contact Info.

Comments This is the June 2020 sale of a property entitled for 12,192 square feet of ground floor retail space and ten upper-floor residential dwelling units in downtown Pacific Grove. The project will reportedly require the developer to acquire water entitlements from the City of Pacific Grove at an estimated cost of $600,000 to $700,000. The project will include a 21-space underground parking garage. The property is currently occupied by a former service station and garage that is now used as a deli. The cost to demolish these improvements is unknown. A Phase 2 environmental report indicated no contamination present at the property.
520 Lighthouse Corporation
518 Lighthouse AF LLC
29621
Cash to seller

0.35 15,150
$198.02
C-D
Downtown Commercial
All available except water rights (to be separately purchased) Josh Jones, Listing Agent
(831) 646-1919
Fully entitled
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 135 ends

City of Pacific Grove
Appraisal of Portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard Owner – City of Pacific Grove
12 Sales Data Analysis
The comparable sales receive the same adjustments as analyzed and described in Appraisal Report No. 20038 with the exception of the adjustments for market conditions. As described on the previous pages, the hospitality market has recovered significantly since the early period of the pandemic in mid-2020. Although RevPAR figures are down over 18% year-over-year in the San Jose/Santa Cruz hospitality market, the economic outlook has become more favorable since 2020 as unemployment has decreased steadily. Accordingly, Comparables L-01 through L-03, which had previously been adjusted downward for market conditions, are considered to have sold during effectively similar market conditions for hospitality land, and no adjustments are applied.

Comparable L-04 is still considered to have sold during inferior market conditions and receives a larger positive adjustment than was applied in the prior appraisal analyses.

The following table summarizes the adjustments made to each comparable. Bold text connotates a more substantial adjustment.

Land Value Conclusion, Adjacent Parcels
Before adjustments, the comparable sales indicate a value for the parcels adjacent to the subject areas between $195.83 and $232.82 per square foot. After adjustments, the sales indicate a value for the subject above Comparables L-01 through L-03, all of which sold in the high-$190’s per square foot, and below $232.82, as indicated by Comparable L-04.

L-01 L-02 L-03 L-04
518 Lighthouse Ave 601-605
Lighthouse Ave
SEC Central Ave. &
Fountain Ave. and
148 15th Ave.

NWC Lighthouse
Ave. & Fountain
Ave.

Pacific Grove, CA Monterey, CA Pacific Grove, CA Pacific Grove, CA Sales Contract Date Jan-20 Oct-19 Mar-19 Sep-15
Sales Price $3,000,000 $1,175,000 $8,400,000 $5,900,000 Parcel Size (Sq. Ft.) 15,150 6,000 42,277 25,341
Sales Price / Sq. Ft. $198.02 $195.83 $198.69 $232.82
Property Rights Conveyed Ø Ø Ø Ø
Financing Terms Ø Ø Ø Ø
Conditions of Sale Ø Ø Ø Ø
Expenditures After Purchase Positive Positive Positive Ø Market Conditions (Time) Ø Ø Ø Positive
Location Positive Positive Positive Positive
Size Negative Negative Ø Negative
Land Use (Zoning / General Plan) Negative Negative Ø Negative Site Utility / Constraints Negative Negative Ø Ø
Water Entitlements Positive Ø Positive Ø
Development Entitlements Negative Ø Negative Ø
Contributory Improvements Ø Negative Ø Negative
Net Adjustment Positive Positive Positive Negative
Comparable L-03 is analyzed as assembled
Comparable
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 136 ends

City of Pacific Grove
Appraisal of Portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard Owner – City of Pacific Grove
13 Comparable L-03 remains the most emphasized sale. It sold relatively recently and is most similar to the subject in terms of project site size and site utility. It was also acquired for development of a hotel project, like the one proposed on the subject areas and adjacent parcels. It requires demolition to accommodate development, occupies an inferior location, and sold with development entitlements in place. However, its land of existing water entitlements and superior market conditions (due to the current pandemic and accompanying market instability) result in somewhat offsetting downward adjustments. Overall, this sale is judged to indicate a value for the parcels adjacent to the subject areas slightly above its sale price of $198.69.

Comparable L-04 is the least emphasized sale, given its 2015 sale date and that the shell of the department store that had previously occupied the site was repurposed and incorporated into the development of the mixed-use residential and commercial project that exists today. Primarily due to the contributory value of the building shell, this sale indicates a value for the land adjacent to the subject areas below its unit price of $232.82 per square foot of land area.

In view of the comparable sale adjustment analysis and emphasis on Comparable L-03, the land adjacent to the subject is concluded to have a unit value toward the low end of the bracketed range, or $205 per square foot. This conclusion represents a 3.5% increase over the conclusion previously reached in 2020, which reflects an improved economic outlook for the hospitality market.

Accordingly, the value of these parcels is shown in the table below.

Underlying Land Value, Sloat Avenue Interest
The analysis of the discounts applied for the interests being acquired, Sloat Avenue’s highest and best use in assembly, and utility relocation costs are carried forward from the previous appraisal reports.

Based on the value of the adjoining lands and the discount rates concluded, the underlying value of the Sloat Avenue interests to be acquired and incorporated into the proposed hotel and commercial development is shown in the following table.

Area (S.F.) Value/ S.F. Total Value
194,735 X $205 = $39,920,675
Total Valuation
Project Area, Not Including Right of Way Areas
PGCC 10-16-24

Page 137 ends

City of Pacific Grove
Appraisal of Portions of Sloat Avenue and Ocean View Boulevard Owner – City of Pacific Grove
14 Underlying Land Value, Ocean View Boulevard Interest The analysis of the discounts applied for the interests being acquired and Ocean View Boulevard’s highest and best use in assembly are carried forward from the previous appraisal reports.

Based on the value of the adjoining lands and the discount rates previously concluded, the underlying value of the Ocean View Boulevard to be acquired and incorporated into the proposed hotel and commercial development is shown in the table below.

Underlying Value, Areas Proposed to be Acquired, Sloat Avenue Appraised Area Area (s.f.)
Unit Value,
Adjacent
Lands
% Rights
to be
Acquired
% Value due
to
Assemblage
Total
Indicated
Value
Sloat Avenue Area 26,778
Within proposed development 19,699 X $205 X 75% X 70% = $2,120,105 Shared access area 7,079 X $205 X 20% X 25% = $72,560
Less: Utility Relocation Cost ($275,000)
Total Value, Sloat Avenue $1,917,665
Underlying Value, Area Proposed to be Acquired, Ocean View Boulevard Appraised Area Area (s.f.)
Unit Value,
Adjacent
Lands
% Rights
to be
Acquired
% Value due
to
Assemblage
Total
Indicated
Value
Ocean View Boulevard Area 3,190 X $205 X 75% X 70% = $343,324 PGCC 10-16-24

Page 138 ends

Agenda No. 12 A

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Matthew Mogensen, City Manager
MEETING DATE: October 16, 2024
SUBJECT: Schedule of Public Hearings to Establish District Boundaries to Transition from the City of Pacific Grove City Council At-Large Election System to a District-Based City Council Election System
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Schedule of Public Hearings to Establish District Boundaries to Transition from the City of Pacific Grove City Council At-Large Election System to a District-Based City Council Election System in accordance with California Elections Code § 10010

1. 2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

DISCUSSION
On October 2, 2024, the City Council considered and approved Resolution No. 24-042, declaring its intent to initiate procedures for a transition from at-large to district-based council member elections.

The staff report package and supporting materials can be accessed at this link. One of the motions the City Council made was to direct the City Manager to develop a tentative timeline for conducting public hearings, formulating proposed district maps scenarios and election sequencing, and present a draft ordinance to the City Council for action.

The California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) provides the process of transitioning from at-large elections to by-district elections in California Elections Code § 10010, which specifically applies to charter cities.

The process includes:

City Council approves a Resolution of Intent to Transition from At-Large Elections to By-district Elections.

1. 2. First Public Hearing on composition of possible districts before draft maps are drawn Second Public Hearing no more than 30 days after First Public Hearing on composition of possible districts before draft maps are drawn

3. 4. Publication of Draft Maps and Election Sequence – at least 7 days prior to public hearing on maps

5. First Public Hearing on Draft Maps
Second Public Hearing on Draft Maps no more than 45 days after First Public Hearing on Draft Maps: Consider Introduction (First Reading) of Ordinance to transition from at-large elections to by-district elections.

6. PGCC 10-16-24

Page 139 ends

Consider Adoption (Second Reading) of Ordinance to transition from at-large elections to by-district elections; public hearing required in connection with adoption of Ordinance; Ordinance becomes effective 30 days after adoption.

7. Proposed Timeline for Public Hearings
Staff has coordinated with legal counsel to develop a proposed timeline for conducting public hearings, formulating proposed district map scenarios and election sequencing, and presenting a draft ordinance to the City Council. The City Council resolved its intentions to complete the transition to district-based elections by January 1, 2025, but in no event later than March 31, 2025. To fulfill the requirements of California Elections Code § 10010, staff has developed the timeline below that completes the process by March 31, 2025.

October 2, 2024 – City Council Adopted Resolution 24-042, declaring its intent to initiate procedures for a transition from at-large to district-based council member elections.

November 20, 2024 – first public hearing on composition of possible districts before draft maps are drawn.

December 18, 2024 – second public hearing on composition of possible districts before draft maps are drawn.

January 8, 2025 – staff will conduct a “community workshop” format meeting to educate residents on how to use the map drawing tools. The meeting will be noticed as a special meeting of the City Council to allow Council Members to attend if they choose, but no hearings will be held at this community workshop.

February 5, 2025 – third public hearing on draft maps submitted by Pacific Grove residents.

March 5, 2025 – fourth public hearing on draft maps submitted by Pacific Grove residents, and First Reading of an Ordinance to adopt a district map and sequencing in which districts will be implemented.

March 19, 2025 - second reading of the Ordinance adopting the district map and sequencing which districts will be implemented.

OPTIONS
Direct staff to take an alternative action.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact resulting from this item.

FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.

PGCC 10-16-24

Page 140 ends

Pacific Grove City CouncilOctober 16, 2024

Pacific Grove City Council
October 16, 2024