Pacific Grove City Council
March 5, 2025

CITY COUNCIL

SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA
Wednesday, March 5, 2025, 5:00 P.M.

Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA Under the Brown Act, public comment for matters on the agenda must relate to that agenda item and public comments for matters not on the agenda must relate to the subject matter jurisdiction of this legislative body. This is a warning that if a member of the public attending this meeting remotely or in-person violates the Brown Act by failing to comply with these requirements of the Brown Act, then the Mayor or Chair may request that speaker be muted. If a member of the public attending this meeting in-person engages in disruptive behavior that disturbs the orderly conduct of the meeting, they may be removed from the meeting after a warning, pursuant to Council Policy 000-17.

PACIFIC GROVE MEETINGS ARE CONDUCTED IN PERSON AT CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER AND VIRTUALLY.

PLEASE NOTE THE MEETING WILL PROCEED AS NORMAL EVEN IF THERE ARE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES ACCESSING ZOOM.

THE CITY WILL DO ITS BEST TO RESOLVE ANY TECHNICAL ISSUES AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.

Join the Zoom Meeting to participate live at:
https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/Zoom_Closed
Please click here for directions to dial into the meeting audio.

AGENDA

CALL TO ORDER

APPROVAL OF AGENDA

SPECIAL MEETING

PUBLIC COMMENT ON SPECIAL MEETING MATTERS
Comments from the public will not receive Council action. Comments must deal with matters on the Closed Session agenda and will be limited to three minutes.

A. Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code Section 54957.6) City Negotiators: Matthew Mogensen, City Manager, Fred Marsh, Administrative Services Director and Leticia Livian, Human Resources Director, Che Johnson, Esq., Liebert Cassidy Whitmore Employee Organization: Police Officers Association

1. Written Public Comment
PGCC 3-5-25

ADJOURNMENT
PGCC 3-5-25

CITY COUNCIL

AMENDED REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Wednesday, March 5, 2025, 6:00 P.M.

Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA The Council will not begin consideration of any item on this agenda later than 10:00 p.m. unless such consideration is approved. Any items on this agenda not considered this evening will be continued to a future meeting.

Copies of the agenda packet are available for review at the Pacific Grove Library, in the Finance Department, and electronically at www.cityofpacificgrove.org/agendas. The most effective method of communication with the City Council is by sending an email to [email protected]. In order to allow the City Council adequate time to review communication related to an agenda item, it is recommended that the communication be sent no later than 9:00 AM on the day prior to the City Council meeting. Public comments received through this email address by noon on the day of the meeting will be posted with the corresponding agenda item.

Under the Brown Act, public comment for matters on the agenda must relate to that agenda item and public comments for matters not on the agenda must relate to the subject matter jurisdiction of this legislative body. This is a warning that if a member of the public attending this meeting remotely or in-person violates the Brown Act by failing to comply with these requirements of the Brown Act, then the Mayor or Chair may request that speaker be muted. If a member of the public attending this meeting in-person engages in disruptive behavior that disturbs the orderly conduct of the meeting, they may be removed from the meeting after a warning, pursuant to Council Policy 000-17.

APPEARING REMOTELY:

Councilmember Chaps Poduri
1530 N Street, Sacramento CA 95814

PACIFIC GROVE COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE CONDUCTED IN PERSON AT CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER AND VIRTUALLY.

PLEASE NOTE THE MEETING WILL PROCEED AS NORMAL EVEN IF THERE ARE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES ACCESSING ZOOM.

THE CITY WILL DO ITS BEST TO RESOLVE ANY TECHNICAL ISSUES AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.

THE PUBLIC MAY ALSO VIEW THE MEETING ON PENINSULA CHANNEL 25.

JOIN THE ZOOM WEBINAR TO PARTICIPATE LIVE AT:
https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/Zoom_CC
Please click here for directions to dial into the meeting audio.

AGENDA

CALL TO ORDER
PGCC 3-5-25

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Councilmember Walkingstick

1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

2. PRESENTATIONS
A. Certificate of Appreciation: Retirement of Ami Lonsinger (22 Years) PG 9 Reference: Brian Anderson, Acting Chief of Police
Recommended Action: Receive a presentation.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

3. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (City-Related Items Only) A. Report on Closed Session by City Attorney
B. Other

4. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
General Public Comment must deal with matters subject to the jurisdiction of the City and the Council that are not on the Regular Agenda. This is the appropriate place to comment as to items on the Consent Agenda, only if you do not wish to have the item pulled for individual consideration by the Council. Comments from the public will be limited to three minutes and will not receive Council action. Comments regarding items on the Regular Agenda shall be heard prior to Council’s consideration of such items at the time such items are called. Whenever possible, written correspondence should be submitted to the Council in advance of the meeting, to provide adequate time for its consideration.

A. Written General Public Comment

CONSENT AGENDA
The Consent Agenda deals with routine and non-controversial matters, and may include action on resolutions, ordinances, or other public hearings for which testimony is not anticipated. The vote on the Consent Agenda shall apply to each item that has not been removed. Any member of Council, staff, or the public may remove an item from the Consent Agenda for individual consideration. When items are pulled for discussion, they will be automatically placed at the end of their respective section within the Regular Agenda. One motion shall be made to adopt all non-removed items on the Consent Agenda.

5. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 12. Unfinished and Ongoing Business A. Minutes of the City Council's February 19, 2025 Special Study Session and Regular Meeting and February 26, 2025 Special Goal Setting Meeting PG 11 PGCC 3-5-25

Reference: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk
Recommended Action: Approve minutes.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

6. RESOLUTIONS
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 12. Unfinished and Ongoing Business or 13. New Business

7. ORDINANCES
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 11. Public Hearings A. Second reading of an ordinance to amend the City Salary Classification Schedule Reference: Leticia Livian, Human Resources Director PG 21 Recommended Action: Held second reading and adopted an ordinance to amend the salary classification schedule to establish a salary range for new classifications of Urban Forester and Principal Civil Engineer.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

8. REPORTS – INFORMATION ONLY
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 12. Unfinished and Ongoing Business or 13. New Business A. Monterey-Salinas Transit Meeting Minutes for December 9, 2024 and January 13, 2025 Reference: Joe Amelio, Mayor Pro Tem PG 25
Recommended Action: Receive minutes.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Community Human Services Board Meeting Highlights for February 20, 2025 Reference: Lori McDonnell, Councilmember PG 39
Recommended Action: Receive the highlights.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

9. REPORTS – REQUIRING ACTION
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 12. Unfinished and Ongoing Business or 13. New Business A. FY 2025-2026 Special Events Calendar PG 42
Reference: Katie Clark, Recreation Manager
Recommended Action:

PGCC 3-5-25

Recommended Action:

1. Approve the FY 2025-2026 Special Events Calendar

2. Approve 5 proposed events as Special Events to be billed at full cost recovery rates Approve 23 proposed events as City Sponsored Events and waive the fees for City staff support and equipment/facility usage

3. CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

10. MEETING MINUTES OF COMMISSIONS, BOARDS, AND COMMITTEES Items pulled from this section will be placed under 13. New Business A. Task Force on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Meeting Minutes: December 9, 2024 and January 13, 2025 PG 55
Reference: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk
Recommended Action: Receive minutes.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

REGULAR AGENDA

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
For public hearings involving a quasi-judicial determination by the Council, the proponent of an item may be given 10 minutes to speak and others in support of the proponent’s position may be given three minutes each. A designated spokesperson for opposition to the item may be given 10 minutes to speak and all others in opposition may be given three minutes each. Very brief rebuttal and surrebuttal may be allowed in the sole discretion of the Council. In public hearings not involving a quasi-judicial determination by the Council, all persons may be given three minutes to speak on the matter.

A. Fourth Public Hearing to Establish District Boundaries to Transition from the City of Pacific Grove City Council At-Large Election System to a District-Based City Council Election System and First Reading on an Ordinance Establishing District-Based Elections for Council Members, Adopting a District Boundary Map, and Assigning a sequence of Elections. This item to commence at 6:15 p.m. PG 60
Reference: Matthew Mogensen, City Manager
Recommended Action:

Hold a Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Establishment of District Boundaries to Transition from an At-Large City Council Election System to a District-Based City Council Election System in accordance with California Elections Code § 10010

1. 2. Discuss method for voting on a preferred map

3. Select a map for inclusion in the ordinance to transition to district elections

4. Request the City Attorney read the title of the ordinance.

5. Motion to waive further reading of the ordinance.

Introduce and hold a first reading of an ordinance establishing district-based elections for Council Members by amending Pacific Grove Municipal Code Title 2 to add a new

6. PGCC 3-5-25

Chapter 2.70 (“district-based elections”), adopting a district boundary map and assigning a sequence of elections for the new districts Direct that publication of the ordinance will be satisfied by publication of a summary approved by the City Attorney

7. 8. Take alternative action.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Proposed Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.40 Stopping, Standing And Parking By Adding Section 16.40.605 Parking Permits For Volunteers At City Sponsored Events Reference: Brian Pierik, City Attorney PG 134
Recommended Action:

1. Request the City Attorney read the title of the ordinance.

2. Motion to waive further reading of the ordinance.

Introduce and hold first reading of an ordinance Amending Chapter 16.40 Stopping, Standing And Parking By Adding Section 16.40.605 Parking Permits For Volunteers At City Sponsored Events

3. Direct that publication of the ordinance will be satisfied by publication of a summary approved by the City Attorney

4. CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
C. Public Hearing to Amend City Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2024-25 PG 138 Reference: Fred Marsh, Administrative Services Director Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution to modify the City’s FY 24-25 Revised Master Fee Schedule
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
D. Fiscal Year 2024-25 Mid-Year Budget Modifications and First Reading of an Ordinance Amending the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget PG 150
Reference: Fred Marsh, Administrative Services Director Recommended Action:

1. Request the City Attorney read the title of the ordinance;

2. Motion to waive further reading of the ordinance;
Introduce and hold first reading of an ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Operating and Capital Improvement Budget; and

3. Direct that publication of the ordinance will be satisfied by publication of a summary approved by the City Attorney.

4. CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

12. UNFINISHED AND ONGOING BUSINESS
PGCC 3-5-25

A. Selection of Core Areas of Focus and Request for Council Members to Draft Goal Statements for Each Selected Core Area PG 169
Reference: Robert Perrault, Consultant
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Council select focus areas and begin the process of drafting goal statements for further consideration.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

13. NEW BUSINESS

14. FULL PRESENTATIONS

15. CLOSED SESSION

ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE OF ADA COMPLIANCE: Pursuant to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (Codified At 42 United States Code Section 12101 and 28 Code of Federal Regulations Part 35), and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the City of Pacific Grove does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, disability, age or sexual orientation in the provision of any services, programs, or activities. The City of Pacific Grove does not discriminate against persons with disabilities. City Hall is an accessible facility. A limited number of assisted listening devices will be available at this meeting. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting or provide the requested agenda format.

PGCC 3-5-25

Agenda No. 2 A

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian Anderson, Acting Chief of Police
MEETING DATE: March 05, 2025
SUBJECT: Certificate of Appreciation: Retirement of Ami Lonsinger (22 Years) CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION
Receive the presentation.

Attachments
Certificate of Appreciation
PGCC 3-5-25

PGCC 3-5-25

Agenda No. 5 A

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk/DEI Coordinator
MEETING DATE: March 05, 2025
SUBJECT: Minutes of the City Council's February 19, 2025 Special Study Session and Regular Meeting and February 26, 2025 Special Goal Setting Meeting CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION
Approve minutes.

Attachments
Draft Minutes 2-19-25
Draft Minutes 2-26-25
PGCC 3-5-25

1 DRAFT MEETING MINUTES

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE

CITY COUNCIL

STUDY SESSION MEETING
Wednesday, February 19, 2025, 5:00 P.M.

Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA YOU MAY VIEW THE MEETING LIVE VIA ZOOM AT:
https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/Zoom_CC

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Smith called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Present in Chamber: Mayor Smith, Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Councilmembers Garfield, McDonnell, Poduri, Rau, and Walkingstick.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Garfield led the pledge of allegiance.

1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
General public comment received from Mike Gibbs and Carmelita Garcia.

A. Written General Public Comment

REGULAR AGENDA

3. NEW BUSINESS
A. City of Pacific Grove City-Wide Organizational Diagnostic Report Presentation Public comment received from Don Murphy, Carmelita Garcia, Mike Gibbs, Andrew Kubica, Inge Lorentzen Daumer, Jane Haines, Anthony Ciani, Christie Thomas, and Lisa Ciani.

Action: Council received the City of Pacific Grove City-Wide Organizational Diagnostic Report Presentation
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
DRAFT PGCC 3-5-25

2 DRAFT MEETING MINUTES

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE

CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, February 19, 2025, 6:00 P.M.

Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA JOIN THE ZOOM WEBINAR TO PARTICIPATE LIVE AT:
https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/Zoom_CC

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Smith called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Present in Chamber: Mayor Smith, Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Councilmembers Garfield, McDonnell, Poduri, Rau, and Walkingstick.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

Councilmember Garfield led the pledge of allegiance.

1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Action: Regular Agenda item 13A was continued to the Council’s Goals Setting Special Meeting on February 26, 2025.

Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Rau and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Council voted 7-0 to approve the agenda as modified.

2. PRESENTATIONS

3. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (City-Related Items Only) A. Council and staff made general announcements.

4. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
General public comment received from Joy Colangelo, Linda Pagnella, Carmelita Garcia, Mike Gibbs, Christi Metzer, and an unnamed speaker.

A. Written General Public Comment

CONSENT AGENDA
Action: Councilmember Garfield recommended Consent Agenda item 9D be continued to a future date.

Public comment received from Peggy Gibbs, Mike Gibbs, Kevin Hanly, Christie Thomas, Cari Rotoli, Debby Beck, and Kris Lindstrom.

Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Garfield and seconded by Councilmember Poduri, the Council voted to continue Consent Agenda item 9D to a future date to allow staff an opportunity to return with more information needed for Council deliberation and decision.

DRAFT PGCC 3-5-25

3 Motion carried 7-0, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Mayor Smith, Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Councilmembers Garfield, McDonnell, Poduri, Rau, and Walkingstick.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: None.

Action: Consent Agenda item 9C was pulled and heard immediately following the Consent Agenda.

Action: Upon motion by Mayor Pro Tem Amelio and seconded by Councilmember Walkingstick, Council voted 7-0 to approve the remainder of the Consent Agenda as modified.

5. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
A. Minutes of the February 5, 2025 Regular Meeting
Action: Approved minutes.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

6. RESOLUTIONS

7. ORDINANCES
A. Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Municipal Code Section 15.16 “Sidewalks” to Allow for Issuance of Sidewalk Dining Permits
Action: Held second reading and adopted Ordinance No. 25-001 Amending Municipal Code Section 15.16 “Sidewalks” to Allow for Issuance of Sidewalk Dining Permits.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

8. REPORTS – INFORMATION ONLY
A. Check Register for January 2025.

Action: Received the Check Register.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Second Quarter FY 24/25 Capital Project Report & Update Action: Received the report.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
C. Second Quarter Treasurer’s Quarterly Report
Action: Received the report.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
D. Housing Element Monthly Status Update
Action: Received the report.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
DRAFT PGCC 3-5-25

4 E. Community Human Services Highlights for January 2025 Action: Received the highlights.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

9. REPORTS – REQUIRING ACTION
A. PGUSD & City of Pacific Grove ELOP MOU 2025
Action: Approved the City of Pacific Grove to enter a Memorandum of Understanding with Pacific Grove Unified School District allowing Pacific Grove Recreation to operate the Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELOP) Summer Camp Program.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Appointments to Museum Board
Action: Approved appointments to Museum Board listed below:
• Museum Board – Melvin Dubee; Amy Tomlinson; Shelton Virden CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
C. Proposed Amended Schedule of City Council Meetings for 2025 and 2026 This item was pulled and considered immediately following the Consent Agenda.

Reference: Matthew Mogensen, City Manager
Recommended Action: Adopt the Proposed Amended Schedule of City Council Meetings for 2025 and 2026.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
D. Pacific Grove Cares Projects See action taken on this item during the Approval of the Consent Agenda.

Action: Authorize Pacific Grove Cares to commence work on two landscape project sites, Caledonia Park by the Tommy Stillwell sign, and Chase Park West, and authorize staff to assist Pacific Grove Cares with the two projects.

CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15304, Class 4, Minor Alterations to Land
E. Parking Permits for Volunteers for City Events
Action: Council approved the recommendation from the Traffic Safety Commission to issue parking permits to volunteers for city events and directed the City Attorney to return to Council with an ordinance to add PG Municipal Code Section 16.40.605 Parking permits for volunteers on city business.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

10. MEETING MINUTES OF COMMISSIONS, BOARDS, AND COMMITTEES A. Recreation Board Minutes: November 25, 2024
Action: Received minutes.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines DRAFT PGCC 3-5-25

5 Section 15378
*****

9.C. Proposed Amended Schedule of City Council Meetings for 2025 and 2026 Public comment received from Inge Lorentzen Daumer, Lisa Ciani, Sally Moore, Carol Marquart, and Andrew Kubica.

Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Garfield and seconded by Councilmember Rau, the Council voted to adopt the Proposed Amended Schedule of City Council Meetings for 2025 and 2026 with the following changes: canceling the July 2, 2025 meeting and keeping the July 16, 2025 meeting, canceling the August 6, 2025 meeting, and keeping the August 20 meeting.

Motion carried 7-0 by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Mayor Smith, Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Councilmembers Garfield, McDonnell, Poduri, Rau, and Walkingstick.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: None.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

REGULAR AGENDA

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. First reading of an ordinance to amend the City Salary Classification Schedule Public comment received from Lisa Ciani.

Action: Upon motion by Mayor Pro Tem Amelio and seconded by Councilmember Poduri, Council voted to

1. Request the City Attorney read the title of the ordinance,

2. Waive further reading of the ordinance,

3. Introduce and hold first reading of an ordinance to amend the salary classification schedule to establish a salary range for new classifications of Urban Forester and Principal Civil Engineer, and approve the amendment, and

4. Direct that publication of the ordinance will be satisfied by publication of a summary approved by the City Attorney.

Motion carried 7-0 by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Mayor Smith, Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Councilmembers Garfield, McDonnell, Poduri, Rau, and Walkingstick.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: None.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Amending the Master Fee Resolution Regarding RZRR & Other Fees This item will be continued to the City Council's March 5, 2025 Regular Meeting.

DRAFT PGCC 3-5-25

6 12. UNFINISHED AND ONGOING BUSINESS
A. Presentation on Fire Preparedness in Pacific Grove
Public comment received from Anthony Ciani, Mike Gibbs, Lisa Ciani, Adam Pinterits, Brian, Richard Paquette, Sally Moore,
Action: Council received the presentation.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. George Washington Park (GWP) Biological Assessment, Direction to Proceed with Developing an Updated GWP Management Plan and Direction to Proceed with ShortTerm Maintenance Activities in GWP Public comment received from Christine Walkingstick, Jennifer Gorman, Kevin Hanly, Richard Paquette, Craig Giraudo, Mary Goblirsch, Baird Pedersen, Lisa Ciani, Mike Gibbs, Cari Rotoli, and Inge Lorentzen Daumer.

Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Garfield and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Council voted to

1. Receive the George Washington Park (GWP) Biological Resources Report and

2. Direct staff to return first to the BNRC with an updated long-term GWP Management Plan and then return to City Council.

Motion carried 7-0 by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Mayor Smith, Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Councilmembers Garfield, McDonnell, Poduri, Rau, and Walkingstick.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: None.

CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15304, Class 4, Minor Alterations to Land
Action: A motion to adjourn by Mayor Pro Tem Amelio was withdrawn.

Action: Upon motion by Mayor Pro Tem Amelio and seconded by Councilmember Rau, Council voted 7-0 to continue past 10:00 p.m. to hear the remaining agenda item.

C. Pine Avenue and Fountain Avenue – Traffic Engineering Study and All-Way Stop at Fountain/Pine
Public comment received from Inge Lorentzen Daumer.

Action: Upon motion by Mayor Pro Tem Amelio and seconded by Councilmember Walkingstick, Council voted 7-0 to

1. Approve engineered plans for installation of all-way stop control at Fountain and Pine.

2. Receive the attached presentation prepared by Kimley Horn.

CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class I, Existing Facilities
DRAFT PGCC 3-5-25

7 13. NEW BUSINESS
A. Goal Setting Process for the FY 25-26 and the FY 26-27 Budget Years During the Approval of the Agenda, this item was continued to the Council’s February 26, 2025 Goals Setting Special Meeting.

Reference: Robert Perrault, Consultant
Recommended Action: Review and approve the Goal Setting Workplan Development Process as the report outlined.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

14. FULL PRESENTATIONS

15. CLOSED SESSION

ADJOURNMENT
Council adjourned the regular meeting at 10:20 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted,
Sandra Kandell
City Clerk
Approved by Mayor: _______________________________Date________________ Attest by City Manager: ____________________________Date_________________ DRAFT PGCC 3-5-25

1 DRAFT MEETING MINUTES

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE

CITY COUNCIL

SPECIAL GOAL SETTING SESSION
Wednesday, February 26, 2025, 6:00 P.M.

Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA YOU MAY VIEW THE MEETING LIVE VIA ZOOM AT:
https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/Zoom_CC

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Smith called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Present in Chamber: Mayor Smith, Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Councilmembers Garfield, McDonnell, Poduri, Rau, and Walkingstick.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Smith led the pledge of allegiance.

1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Action: Upon motion by Mayor Pro Tem Amelio and seconded by Councilmember Poduri, Council voted 7-0 to approve the agenda.

REGULAR AGENDA

2. NEW BUSINESS
A. Goal Setting Process for the FY 25-26 and the FY 26-27 Budget Years This item was continued from the Council's February 19, 2025 Regular Meeting Public comment received from Lisa Ciani.

Action: Upon motion by Mayor Pro Tem Amelio and seconded by Councilmember Rau, Council voted 7-0 to approve the goal setting workplan development process.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. 2023-2025 Community Goals and Workplan Update and Staff Informational Presentation Public comment received from Andrew Kubica and Sally Moore.

Action: Council received the update and presentation from staff.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
DRAFT PGCC 3-5-25

2 ADJOURNMENT
Council adjourned the special meeting at 7:20 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted,
Sandra Kandell
City Clerk
Approved by Mayor: _______________________________Date________________ Attest by City Manager: ____________________________Date_________________ DRAFT PGCC 3-5-25

Agenda No. 7 A

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Leticia Livian, Human Resources Director
MEETING DATE: March 05, 2025
SUBJECT: Second reading of an ordinance to amend the City Salary Classification Schedule CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION
Held second reading and adopted an ordinance to amend the salary classification schedule to establish a salary range for new classifications of Urban Forester and Principal Civil Engineer.

DISCUSSION
No changes were made between the first and second readings of this ordinance. The City Clerk caused a summary of the ordinance to be published on February 27, 2025.

The City’s salary schedule identifies job classifications that have been approved by Council (e.g., Administrative Technician) and the hourly rates of pay for each classification at each step authorized by the Personnel Rules. Pursuant to Charter Article 25 and the Pacific Grove Municipal Code (PGMC) Section 4.20.280, approval and amendment to the salary schedule must be adopted by the Council.

City Council approved adding two new classifications at the FY 24/25 mid-year budget adjustment:
urban forester and civil engineer.

There are several common experience levels of civil engineers. Staff is recommending the civil engineer be brought in as an experience level of Principal Civil Engineer. This level requires five years of civil engineering experience and allows for highly responsible assistance to the Public Works Director, as well as provides supervision of public works personnel.

The requested changes to the salary scheduled are for the addition of an Urban Forester and a Principal Civil Engineer classifications, all other classifications in the salary schedule remain the same. To view the entire salary schedule, please refer to the City’s website, http://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/about-city/human-resources/salaries-benefits-and-mous.

The proposed salary ranges for both classifications is listed below.

Classification Step Step Step Step Step Step Step
Urban Forester 1A 2B 3C 4D 5E 6F 7G
Hourly Rate 45.22 47.49 49.86 52.35 54.97 57.03 59.17
PGCC 3-5-25

Hourly Rate 45.22 47.49 49.86 52.35 54.97 57.03 59.17

Classification Step Step Step Step Step Step Step
Principal Civil Engineer 1A 2B 3C 4D 5E 6F 7G
Hourly Rate 55.79 58.58 61.50 64.58 67.81 71.20 74.76
The recommended salary ranges are based on market and internal analysis of compensation. Urban Forester is bench-marked with the City’s current classification of Program Manager and the Principal Civil Engineer is bench-marked with the City’s classification of Program Manager, Senior.

Both draft job descriptions can be found on the city’s website, or by clicking here for Urban Forester and clicking here for Principal Civil Engineer.

OPTIONS

1. Take no action.

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

From the 9/18/2024 mid-year FY 24/25 budget amendment, estimated fiscal impacts and annual costs are listed below.

Proposed New Position Est. Annual
Cost
Est. Impact
FY 24-25*
City Forester $230,000 $38,000
City Engineer $306,000 $51,000
* Estimates are based on the positions being filled by the end of April 2025.

FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.

Attachments
Ordinance
PGCC 3-5-25

ORDINANCE NO. 25 -

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE

AMENDING THE SALARY CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE TO ADD

URBAN FORESTER AND PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER

CLASSIFICATIONS
Findings

1. City Council approved adding two new classifications to the FY 24/25 budget; and

2. The two new classifications are Urban Forester and Principal Civil Engineer; and

3. New classifications, Urban Forester and Principal Civil Engineer are being added to the salary schedule; and

4. Amendment to the salary schedule classification plan must be adopted by the City Council pursuant to Pacific Grove Municipal Code (PGMC) Section 4.20.280; and

5. In the enactment of this ordinance, the City followed the guidelines adopted by the State of California and published in the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000, et seq. Enactment of this ordinance action does not constitute a “project” as defined by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment pursuant Section 15378.

Ordinance

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The foregoing findings of the City Council are incorporated into this Ordinance as if set forth in full.

SECTION 2. The position classification plan approved and adopted by the City Council pursuant to PGMC § 4.20.280 is amended to add Urban Forester and Principal Civil Engineer classifications with the following salary schedule:

Classification - Hourly Rates Step
1A
Step
2B
Step
3C
Step
4D
Step
5E
Step
6F
Step
7G
Urban Forester 45.22 47.49 49.86 52.35 54.97 57.03 59.17 Principal Civil Engineer 55.79 58.58 61.50 64.58 67.81 71.20 74.76 PGCC 3-5-25

SECTION 3. The City Manager is directed to execute all documents and to perform all other necessary City acts to implement this Ordinance.

SECTION 4. Upon approval at second reading, this ordinance shall be given an effective date of 03/05/2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE this 5TH day of March, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:

NICK SMITH, Mayor
ATTEST:

SANDRA KANDELL, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BRIAN PIERIK, City Attorney
PGCC 3-5-25

Agenda No. 8 A

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joe Amelio, Mayor Pro Tem
MEETING DATE: March 05, 2025
SUBJECT: Monterey-Salinas Transit Meeting Minutes for December 9, 2024 and January 13, 2025
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION
Receive minutes.

Attachments
December 2024
January 2025
PGCC 3-5-25

Agenda # 3-3
February 10, 2025 Meeting

MEETING OF THE MST BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2024
10:00 am (Pacific)

Present: Mary Ann Carbone, Chair City of Sand City
Lorraine Worthy, Vice Chair City of Gonzales
Jeff Baron City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
Kim Shirley City of Del Rey Oaks
Ariana Rodriguez City of Greenfield
Mike LeBarre City of King
Liesbeth Visscher City of Marina
Ed Smith City of Monterey
Joe Amelio City of Pacific Grove
Dave Pacheco City of Seaside
Anna Velazquez City of Soledad
Luis Alejo County of Monterey

Absent: Tony Barrera City of Salinas
Counsel: Michael D. Laredo General Counsel De Lay & Laredo Staff: Carl Sedoryk General Manager/CEO
Lisa Rheinheimer Deputy CEO
Kelly Halcon Chief Human Resources Officer
Michael Kohlman Chief Information Officer
Norman Tuitavuki Chief Operating Officer
Michelle Overmeyer Director of Planning and Innovation
Andrea Williams Finance Manager
Asuzena Flores Grants Analyst
Beronica Carriedo C/S & Community Relations Supervisor
Jacqueline Munoz Customer Service Representative
Ezequiel Rebollar IT System Engineer
Ikuyo Yoneda-Lopez Marketing & Communications Manager
Jacob Huggins IT Specialist
Kevin Allshouse Contract Transportation Manager
Marzette Henderson Transportation Manager
Scott Taylor Information Technology Manager
Ursulla Sardina Communications Specialist
PGCC 3-5-25

Public: Don Gilchrest Thomas Walters & Associates
Matt Robinson SYSAL
Jasmine Mejia-Cortez Monterey County Board of Supervisors Linda Gonzales Monterey County Board of Supervisors
Luis Torres Member of the Public

1. CALL TO ORDER
1-1. Roll Call. (Ikuyo Yoneda-Lopez)
1-2. Pledge of Allegiance.

Chair Carbone called the meeting to order at 10:02 a.m. Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. Director Baron led the pledge of allegiance. 1-3. Review Highlights of the agenda. (Carl Sedoryk)
General Manager/CEO, Carl Sedoryk reviewed the highlights of the agenda.

Directors Alejo and Rodriguez arrived at 10:05 a.m.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Jose Manuel Torres commented that he will have members of the public make comments on agenda item 5-4.

Director LeBarre proposed that Action Item 5-4 be moved to the next item on the agenda to allow for all public comments. The staff report was presented by Emma Patel, MST planning manager. MST translator services were provided to members of the public in attendance from South County. 5-4. Approve Extension of Greenfield On-Call Services Beyond December 31, 2024. (Emma Patel) (Page 61)
Board comments and questions were received.

Several members of the public expressed concerns about On Call services in Greenfield being proposed for discontinuation on December 31, 2024. Michelle Overmeyer, Director of Planning and Innovation reminded the Board and public members that RIDES ADA paratransit services will continue and are not proposed for elimination. Only On Call services would be discontinued and then replaced with a fixed-route circulator in spring 2025.

On a motion by Director Rodriguez, seconded by Director LeBarre and carried by the following roll call vote, the Board approved item 5-4:

PGCC 3-5-25

AYES: 12 Alejo, Amelio, Baron, Carbone, LeBarre, Pacheco, Rodriguez, Shirley, Smith, Velazquez, Visscher, and
Worthy
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 1 Barrera
ABSTAIN: 0
RECUSE: 0

3. CONSENT AGENDA
These items will be approved by a single motion. Anyone may request that an item be discussed and considered separately.
3-1. Financial Report – October 2024. (Lori Lee) (Page 7) a) Accept Report of October 2024 Cash Flow
b) Approve October 2024 Disbursements
c) Accept report of October 2024 Treasury Transactions
3-2. Approve Minutes of the MST Board Meeting on November 4, 2024. (Jeanette Alegar-Rocha) (Page 19)
3-3. Receive Draft Minutes of the MST Board Administrative Performance Committee Meeting on November 4, 2024 (Jeanette Alegar-Rocha) (Page 25)
3-4. Adopt Resolution 2025-10 Recognizing Esteban Garcia (Utility Service Technician) as Employee of the Month for December 2024. (Norman Tuitavuki) (Page 29)
3-5. Receive the 2025 Board Meeting Calendar, Committee Meeting Schedule, and Conference Dates. (Jeanette Alegar-Rocha) (Page 31) 3-6. Authorize the General Manager/CEO or their Designee to Enter into a Contract with Sentry Alarm for Alarm System Replacement in the Amount of $123,997, and a Three (3) Year Service Contract, with the Option to Extend for Two (2) Additional One (1) Year Periods at $3,398 Per Month, with a Total Contract Amount Not to Exceed $327,877, Including Option Years. (Steven Bruno) (Page 35)
3-7. Approve Minutes of the MST Special Board Meeting on November 25, 2024. (Ikuyo Yoneda-López) (Page 37)
There were no public comments on the Consent Agenda.

PGCC 3-5-25

On a motion by Director Smith, seconded by Director Amelio, the Board unanimously approved all items on the Consent Agenda with Director Barerra absent.

4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

5. ACTION ITEMS
5-1. Approve 2025 State Legislative Program. (Michelle Overmeyer/Michael Pimentel/Matt Robinson) (Page 41)
There were no public comments.

On a motion by Director Velazquez, seconded by Director Alejo, the Board unanimously approved item 5-1 with Director Barrera absent. 5-2. Approve 2025 Federal Legislative Program. (Carl Sedoryk/Don Gilcrest) (Page 47)
There were no public comments.

On a motion by Director Alejo, seconded by Director Visscher, the Board unanimously approved item 5-1 with Director Barrera absent. 5-3. Review Agenda for Board Strategic Session in January. (Carl Sedoryk) (Page 53)
There were no public comments.

The MST Board received the draft agenda for the Board Strategic Session in January 2025.

6. RECOGNITIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
6-1. December 2024 Employee of the Month – Esteban Garcia, Utility Service Technician. (Norman Tuitavuki)
The MST Board recognized Esteban Garcia as the December 2024 Employee of the Month for his outstanding contribution to MST and the entire community.
6-2. 25 Year Service Recognition – Richard Higoy, Facilities Technician. (Paul Lopez)
PGCC 3-5-25

The MST Board recognized Richard Higoy for his 25 years of service and outstanding contribution to MST and the entire community. 6-3. MST Administrative Peer of the Year 2024 Recognitions. (Kelly Halcon) Individual Job Title MST Department
Courtney Neff Operations Superintendent Administration
Auggie Ruelas Mechanic A Maintenance
Jose de Jesus Ramirez
Gomez
Coach Operator Operations
The MST Board recognized Courtney Neff, Auggie Ruelas, and Jose de Jesus Ramirez Gomez as the 2024 Administrative Peer of the Year winners in their respective departments.

7. REPORTS & INFORMATION ITEMS
The Board will receive and file these reports, which do not require action by the Board.
7-1. General Manager/CEO Monthly Report – October 2024 (Page 69) 7-2. Federal Legislative Advocacy Report (Page 71)
7-3. State Legislative Advocacy Update (Page 75)
7-4. Staff Trip Reports – (None)
7-5. Correspondence – (None)

8. BOARD REPORTS, COMMENTS, AND REFERRALS
8-1. Reports on Meetings Attended by Board Members at MST Expense. (AB 1234)
Chair Carbone submitted a written report regarding her attendance at the CTA Fall Conference in San Jose, CA on November 20-22, 2024.

Director Velazquez provided a verbal report of her attendance at the CTA Fall Conference in San Jose, CA on November 20-22, 2024. 8-2. Board Member Comments and Announcements.
8-3. Board Member Referrals for Future Agendas.

PGCC 3-5-25

9. ATTACHMENTS
9-1. The October 2024 Monthly Report can be viewed online at http://mst.org/about-mst/board-of-directors/board-meetings/

10. CLOSED SESSION
Members of the public may address the Board on any matter related to Closed Session.

There is a time limit of not more than three minutes for each speaker. The Board will not take action or respond immediately to any public comments presented, but may choose to follow-up at a later time individually, through staff, or on a subsequent agenda. (Please refer to page 1 of the agenda for instructions) As permitted by Government Code §64956 et seq. of the State of California, the Board of Directors may adjourn to Closed Session to consider specific matters dealing with personnel and/or pending possible litigation and/or conferring with the Board's MeyersMilias-Brown Act representative.

None

11. ADJOURN
With no further business to discuss, Chair Carbone adjourned the meeting at 12:02 p.m. (Pacific).

Prepared by: ___________________Reviewed by: __________________ Jeanette Alegar-Rocha Carl G. Sedoryk
Deputy Secretary/Clerk to the Board General Manager/CEO PGCC 3-5-25

Agenda # 3-6
February 10, 2025 Meeting

MEETING OF THE MST BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Meeting Minutes
January 13, 2025
10:00 am (Pacific)

Present: Mary Ann Carbone, Chair City of Sand City
Lorraine Worthy, Vice Chair City of Gonzales
Jeff Baron City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
Kim Shirley City of Del Rey Oaks
Ariana Rodriguez City of
Mike LeBarre City of King
Liesbeth Visscher City of Marina
Ed Smith City of Monterey
Joe Amelio City of Pacific Grove
Tony Barrera City of Salinas
Dave Pacheco City of Seaside
Fernando Cabrera City of Soledad
Luis Alejo County of Monterey

Absent: None
Counsel: Michael D. Laredo General Counsel De Lay & Laredo Staff: Carl Sedoryk General Manager/CEO
Lisa Rheinheimer Deputy CEO
Kelly Halcon Chief Human Resources Officer
Michael Kohlman Chief Information Officer
Norman Tuitavuki Chief Operating Officer
Michelle Overmeyer Director of Planning and Innovation
Jeanette Alegar-Rocha Deputy Secretary/Clerk to the Board Asuzena Flores Grants Analyst
Beronica Carriedo C/S & Community Relations Supervisor
Christine Church Compliance Analyst
Danitza Lopez HR Assistant
David Bielsker Transit Scheduler
Elena Grigorichina Operations Specialist
Ezequiel Rebollar IT System Engineer
Ikuyo Yoneda-Lopez Marketing & Communications Manager
Jacob Huggins IT Specialist
PGCC 3-5-25

Jacqueline Munoz Customer Service Representative
Jarred Augusta Risk and Safety Manager
Kevin Allshouse Contract Transportation Manager
Leticia Trevino Coach Operator
Marzette Henderson Transportation Manager
Natalie Flores Associate Planner
Scott Taylor Information Technology Manager
Sonjé Dayries Civil Rights Officer
Ursulla Sardina Communications Specialist
Vince Dang Project Manager Coordinator
Yasmin Guevarra HR Assistant
Public: Brian Cox MV Transportation
Steven Johnson MV Transportation
Todd Muck TAMC
Javier Gomez Monterey County Board of Supervisors
Jasmine Mejia-Cortes Monterey County Board of Supervisors Linda Gonzalez Monterey County Board of Supervisors
Chris Duymich AMBAG
Bryan Rosen Member of the Public
Lorna Moffett Member of the Public

1. CALL TO ORDER
1-1. Roll Call.
1-2. Pledge of Allegiance.
1-3. Conduct Swearing in Ceremony of New Board Member Fernando Cabrera.

Chair Carbone called the meeting to order at 9:03 a.m. Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. Director Amelio led the pledge of allegiance. 1-4. Review Highlights of the agenda. (Carl Sedoryk)
General Manager/CEO, Carl Sedoryk reviewed the highlights of the agenda.

Director Smith arrived at 9:09 a.m.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Bryan Rosen from the public made comments.

3. CONSENT AGENDA
PGCC 3-5-25

These items will be approved by a single motion. Anyone may request that an item be discussed and considered separately.
3-1. Approve Resolution 2025-11 Recognizing Jacob Huggins, IT Specialist, as Employee of the Year for 2024. (Carl Sedoryk) (Page 7)
End of Consent Agenda
Director Alejo arrived at 9:16 a.m.

There were no public comments on the Consent Agenda.

On a motion by Director Shirley, seconded by Director Amelio, the Board unanimously approved all items on the Consent Agenda.

4. RECOGNITIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
4-1. 2024 Employee of the Year Presentation – Jacob Huggins, IT Specialist. (Carl Sedoryk)
There were no public comments.

The MST Board recognized Jacob Huggins as the 2024 Employee of the Year for his outstanding contribution to MST and the entire community. 4-2. 2024 GM Manager Excellence Award – Jarred Augusta, Risk and Security Manager. (Carl Sedoryk)
There were no public comments.

The MST Board recognized Jarred Augusta as the recipient of the 2024 GM Excellence Award and for his outstanding contribution to MST and the entire community.
4-3. Board Member Service Recognitions – Mary Ann Carbone There were no public comments.

The MST Board recognized Mayor Mike LeBarre, City of King and Councilmember David Pacheco, City of Seaside for their 10 years of service since January 12, 2015 and for their outstanding contribution to MST and the entire community.

5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

PGCC 3-5-25

6. ACTION ITEMS
6-1. Conduct Strategic Planning Workshop:

A. Strategic Progress to Date and Emerging Issues

1. FY 2023-2025 Strategic Plan and 2-Year Action Plan Status Update. (Carl Sedoryk)
i. Planning and Innovation Update and Emerging Items.
(Michelle Overmeyer) (Page 9)
Vice Chair Worthy commented that she rode the City of Gonzales circular and noted that the contactless validator seemed to be out of service.

There were no public comments.
ii. Administration, Capital Projects, and Emerging Issues. (Lisa Rheinheimer) (Page 17)
There were no public comments.
iii. Human Resources Department Update and Emerging
Issues. (Kelly Halcon) (Page 19)
Board member comments made by Amelio, Barrera, Visscher, Smith, Baron and Alejo related to the policy of storage and distribution of NARCAN on buses which is currently pending.

Board member comments made by Amelio, Barrera, Smith and Alejo related to driver safety and police response. Staff responded that training and equipment such as barriers on the bus are available to protect the drivers. Staff is also working with frontline supervisors on how to clearly communicate to police dispatchers when reporting incidents.

There were no public comments.
iv. Operations and Maintenance Department Update and
Emerging Issues. (Norman Tuitavuki) (Page 23)
Director Baron wanted to be more informed about the Hydrogen Fuel, Infrastructure, and EV Buses rollout plan and asked for regular updates to the Operations Committee. Staff will include regular updates in the General Manager’s report and for the Operations Committee.

There were no public comments.

PGCC 3-5-25

v. Information Technology and Cybersecurity Update and
Emerging Issues. (Michael Kohlman) (Page 31)
There were no public comments.

B. Board Policy and Performance Items

1. Contactless Fare Payment Transition Plan. (Carl Sedoryk)(Page 37)
Director Baron asked if MST is on schedule to retire the legacy MST fare payment system at the end of 2026. Staff responded that the goal is to eliminate collection of cash payment for fares on board the bus and replace it with contactless payment technology.

Director LeBarre commented on the importance of the placement location of the contactless payment machine on the bus vs. the cash payment box.

Director Worthy commented that she wanted to ride the Circulator in Gonzales and did not have cash but the contactless payment machine was out of service.

Chair Carbone asked if the contactless payment method will be usable for the taxi voucher program.

Brian Rosen and Lorma Moffet from the public made comments.

2. Zero Emissions Bus Transition Plan. (Norm Tuitavuki) (Page 39) Director Shirley asked if MST is able to retrofit electric buses to hydrogen fuel cell. Norm responded that he is unsure if this could be done.

Director LeBarre asked if the regulations allow for an onsite diesel powered generator for charging.

Chair Carbone asked if there is room to add Hydrogen Fuel infrastructures projects.

There were no public comments.

3. Future of Contracted Transportation Services. (Norm Tuitavuki) (Page 43)
Questions and comments were received from board members. Staff received direction from the Board to provide information: 1) to compare both existing and proposed MV costs against the outcome of competitive bids; 2) to compare some models of MST taking over some or all of contracted PGCC 3-5-25

transportation services, including service levels and additional costs; 3) identify any new sources of income or revenues that would be required due to these changes and impact to budget; and 4) to keep current contracted transportation services “status quo.”
There were no public comments.

4. MST Land Utilization Discussion. (Carl Sedoryk) (Page 45) Board member Smith requested a future closed session agenda time to discuss future liquidation of excess MST properties.

Bryan Rosen and Lorna Moffet from the public made comments.

5. MST Board Code of Conduct Policy Discussion. (Carl Sedoryk) (Page 53)
Questions and comments were received from board members. Direction was provided for board members to provide comments directly to the board chair by the February 10, 2025 board meeting for Board consideration in March 2025.

There were no public comments.

6. Four-Year Strategic Plan Discussion. (Carl Sedoryk) (Page 57) Mr. Sedoryk asked board members to provide him with comments or recommendations for the next facilitated four-year strategic planning session workshop.

There were no public comments.

C. Conclude Workshop

7. REPORTS & INFORMATION ITEMS
The Board will receive and file these reports, which do not require action by the Board. 7-1. General Manager/CEO Monthly Report – November 2024 (Page 59)

8. BOARD REPORTS, COMMENTS, AND REFERRALS
8-1. Reports on Meetings Attended by Board Members at MST Expense. (AB 1234)
8-2. Board Member Comments and Announcements.
8-3. Board Member Referrals for Future Agendas.

PGCC 3-5-25

Board member Smith requested a future closed session agenda time to discuss future liquidation of excess MST properties.

Provide comments to the board chair for MST Board Code of Conduct Policy by the February 10, 2025 board meeting for Board consideration in March 2025.

9. ATTACHMENTS
9-1. The Monthly Report for November 2024 can be viewed online:
http://mst.org/about-mst/board-of-directors/board-meetings/

10. CLOSED SESSION
Members of the public may address the Board on any matter related to Closed Session.

There is a time limit of not more than three minutes for each speaker. The Board will not take action or respond immediately to any public comments presented, but may choose to follow-up at a later time individually, through staff, or on a subsequent agenda. (Please refer to page 1 of the agenda for instructions) As permitted by Government Code §64956 et seq. of the State of California, the Board of Directors may adjourn to Closed Session to consider specific matters dealing with personnel and/or pending possible litigation and/or conferring with the Board's MeyersMilias-Brown Act representative.

None

11. ADJOURN
With no further business to discuss, Chair Carbone adjourned the meeting at 12:18 p.m. (Pacific).

Prepared by: ___________________Reviewed by: __________________ Jeanette Alegar-Rocha Carl G. Sedoryk
Deputy Secretary/Clerk to the Board General Manager/CEO PGCC 3-5-25

Agenda No. 8 B

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lori McDonnell, Councilmember
MEETING DATE: March 05, 2025
SUBJECT: Community Human Services Board Meeting Highlights for February 20, 2025 CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION
Receive the highlights.

Attachments
CHS Highlights
PGCC 3-5-25

HIGHLIGHTS OF

REGULAR BOARD MEETING
February 20, 2025

1. Mary Ann Carbone, Board Chair, called the meeting to order at 11:08 a.m. at City Hall in Sand City.

2. The Board approved routine consent items, including minutes of the January 16, 2025 Board meeting and disbursements for the period of January 1-31, 2025 in the amount of $1,662,010.78.

3. From the CEO report:
• Total donations for January 2025: $17,760 from 62 donors and 8 in-kind donations. Most of the in-kind donations were for a client who just moved out of Safe Passage into permanent housing.
• Significant donations were as follows:
▪ $10,000 for Shuman HeartHouse (SHH)
▪ $1,000 unrestricted
▪ $925 unrestricted, via a nurse practitioner at CHOMP who collected donations for CHS at his house party.
• Bombas donated 3,000 pairs of socks which were delivered to Shuman HeartHouse, Casa de Noche Buena (CDNB), the SHARE Center, Safe Place Salinas and Monterey, Safe Passage, and Salinas Valley Street Outreach Program for distribution to individuals experiencing homelessness.

• Grant applications were submitted to:
▪ Pebble Beach Company Foundation, $10,000 for CDNB
▪ Yellow Brick Road, $10,000 for SHH
▪ William G. Irwin Charity Foundation, $111,839 for Family Service Center facilities improvements
▪ Stevenson School Philanthropy Project, $10,000-$12,000 to support outreach and marketing costs for the new youth outpatient SUD program • A fundraising event will take place on Saturday, April 12, from 12-6 pm at the Sand City Art Park—“Banding Together: A Jamfest to Support Mental Health, Substance Abuse, and Homeless Services.” Suggested donation $30.
• We continue to interview for vacant Senior Program Officer of Mental Health Services and Development Director positions.
• “Solving Homelessness: A Community Conversation” will take place on April 24th from 2- 4pm at MIIS Irvine Auditorium, featuring Kevin Adler, author of “When We Walk By,” who will speak on stigma, broken systems that contribute to homelessness and what we can do.

PGCC 3-5-25

• The CEO, CFO & COO worked on FY 25-26 projected budget for the SHARE Center at the request of the City and County. This is a very preliminary look at funding needs for next year and subject to change by all parties.
• Currently serval notable construction projects are underway: The Genesis House Bathroom Improvements project and The Safe Passage Facility Improvements Project.

4. From the COO report:
• The SHARE Center is doing well and is now fully staffed. We have resumed intakes and are currently serving 70 guests, scheduling 4 intakes per day to reach full capacity. SHARE Center is participating in the Inclement Weather Program, offering emergency shelter beds when the County of Monterey declares inclement weather. • Process is being made to expand Off Main Clinic services into the neighboring Outpatient Drug Treatment Program.

5. The Finance Committee meeting was held earlier in the day. Financial reports were provided in the board packet for review.

6. The Board provisionally approved a resolution authorizing the Agency to establish a $1 million line of credit with Pinnacle Bank with defined terms.

7. The board approved the Family Service Center Seaside Mainline Pluming Project with JD Underground’s bid, not to exceed $40K.

8. Board Member Annette Yee Steck shared MCOE’s Annual Education Report in both English and Spanish by email.

9. Board Members and CEO Robin McCrae went into a closed session to conference with legal counsel regarding anticipated litigation. No action was taken.

10. Board Chair Mary Ann Carbone adjourned the meeting at 1:23p.m.

The next regular board meeting is scheduled for Thursday, March 20th from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at the Sand City City Hall, Sand City, CA.

PGCC 3-5-25

Agenda No. 9 A

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Katie Clark, Recreation Manager
MEETING DATE: March 05, 2025
SUBJECT: FY 2025-2026 Special Events Calendar
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION

1. Approve the FY 2025-2026 Special Events Calendar

2. Approve 5 proposed events as Special Events to be billed at full cost recovery rates Approve 23 proposed events as City Sponsored Events and waive the fees for City staff support and equipment/facility usage

3. DISCUSSION
At the beginning of each calendar year the Recreation Board reviews a list of proposed special events scheduled to occur during the upcoming fiscal year (July 1st – June 30th) and makes a recommendation for City Council to approve these events as classified pursuant to City Council Policy No. 900-1.

The proposed FY 2025-2026 Special Events Calendar has 28 events. This is the same number of events as the special events calendar approved for the prior fiscal year. The calendar and estimated costs associated with each event can be found in the agenda attachments.

CITY COUNCIL POLICY 900-1: SPECIAL EVENTS
City Council Policy 900-1 Special Events provides clear guidance for all special events held within the City of Pacific Grove. This policy outlines the process for application submission, application review, event classification, billing, late submissions and approval by City Council. Each year the application is posted during the summer. Completed applications are due by November 30th, reviewed by city staff, presented to the Recreation Board in January and then taken to City Council for final approval in February. This policy ensures that a healthy and financially feasible balance remains in place between the number of special event applications and the ability of our neighborhoods, parks, and facilities to accommodate approved events. Special events are to be classified as either:

Special Events: These events require exclusive use of City property and require support from Police, Fire, or Public Works. Events in this classification will be billed at full cost recovery rates.

1. PGCC 3-5-25

City Sponsored Events: These events include traditional events that are primarily hosted by the Chamber of Commerce, Pacific Grove Unified School District, or the City and they shall receive full city support. These events will be noted annually on the Special Events Calendar for approval by the City Council.

2. At their meeting on March 14, 2024, the Planning Commission approved a 3-year Coastal Development Permit for special events listed on the FY 2024-2025 Special Events Calendar that occur within the coastal zone. For the FY 2025-2026 Special Events Calendar, there are 2 new applications for events that will occur in the coastal zone. Those events are the Pacific Grove Museum Night Owl event and the City of Pacific Grove’s Public Works Week: Touch A Truck event. At their meeting on February 13, 2025, the Planning Commission approved an amendment that added these events to the existing 3-year permit.

PROPOSED CLASSIFICATIONS
Special Events (Full Cost Recovery): Events are billed at the full cost recovery rates for staff support and facility/equipment use. Most of these events consist of a variety of fundraisers, races, walks and car shows.

Special Events (Full Cost Recovery) include: Celebration of our Lady of Fatima, Classic Motorsports Kick-Off Car, Concours & Car Club (Previously named Legends of the Autobahn), BSIM Monterey Bay Half Marathon & 5K/By the Bay 3K and the Rudolph Run 1K & 5K Walk/Run.

City Sponsored: All costs associated with these events including staffing and equipment/facility use are proposed to be waived, with an increased emphasis of utilizing volunteers whenever possible.

City Sponsored Events include: 4th of July Celebration, Youth Ambassadors Movie Night, Youth Ambassadors Dance, Pet Parade, Pacific Grove Summer Lights, Hiroshima-Nagasaki Remembrance Day, National Night Out, Little Car Show, P.G. Concours Auto Rally, Walk with Pride, Butterfly Parade, Sunset Celebration, Butterfly Days, Croquet Tournament, Pacific Grove Museum Night Owl, Veterans Day Ceremony, Holiday Tree Lighting, Holiday Parade of Lights, Stillwell’s Holiday in the Park, Quilt Show, Good Old Days, Walk of Remembrance, and Public Works Week Touch A Truck.

NEW EVENT APPLICATIONS
The Pacific Grove Museum’s Night Owl Event will take place on Saturday, October 11, 2025, from 6:00 pm to 10:00 pm. The event will use the Pacific Grove Museum, the sidewalk area in front of the museum, and Central Ave between Grand Ave and Forest Ave. The event is an annual fundraiser for the museum and will feature crafts, activities, talks with a falconer, merchandise vendors, food vendors, beer and wine, a raffle and a live DJ. Food vendors and the live music will be placed outside on Central Ave. Alcohol will only be served inside the museum and drinks will not be permitted outside the building. There will be a charge of $35.00 per person, with additional charges for food and alcohol. The museum will use a private security company to provide additional security measures. City services required for this event will be public works for road closures and police for public safety.

The Public Works Department and the Recreation Department will work together to host the Public Works Week: Touch A Truck Event. It will take place on Tuesday, May 19, 2026, from 4:00 pm to 6:00 PGCC 3-5-25

pm at Caledonia Park and on Central Ave between Caledonia Ave and Lighthouse Ave. The goal of the event is to celebrate National Public Works Week, offer information and educational opportunities for participants, and of course provide a chance to see and touch the big trucks that help make our city a safe and clean place to live. This event will feature a variety of public works vehicles, a police car, and fire engine (pending availability), along with themed activities, crafts and educational tables. City services required for this event will be public works for road closures, recreation staff for activities, police and fire for use of vehicles.

OPTIONS

1. Take no action

2. Provide alternate direction
FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Each application has been reviewed by City staff for safety, feasibility, and calculation of all anticipated costs to be incurred by the City or sponsoring organization. City staff is recommending that 5 events be classified as Special Events to be billed at full cost recovery rates. The fees for City personnel, equipment usage, facility rental, and all other permitting costs will be the responsibility of the organization hosting the event. City staff is recommending 23 special events to be classified as City Sponsored Events. The fees for City personnel, including Public Works, Police, Fire and Recreation would be subsidized by the City of Pacific Grove. The fees for equipment usage, facility rentals, and any permit charges would be waived.

The estimated staffing costs for all 28 events is $185,550.52. Fees for staffing, equipment/facility usage and permit processing from the full cost recovery events will provide an estimated $63,163.59 in cost recovery. The City of Pacific Grove will need to subsidize an estimated $122,386.93 in order to safely and successfully execute the 28 events listed on the proposed FY 2025-2026 Special Events Calendar.

City staff will continue working with event organizers to lessen the City’s associated costs of these events whenever possible by utilizing volunteers and community groups.

The proposed Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Special Events Calendar provides a lineup of events that offer many benefits to our local community. These events allow our residents and visitors a chance to enjoy a variety of activities, support local businesses and non-profit groups, and engage with each other. The total economic impact and benefits in the form of increased Transient Occupancy and Sales taxes are not known, but special events traditionally have made a positive impact to the City’s economy. Many of these events attract participants and visitors from outside the City of Pacific Grove or Monterey Peninsula.

FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Recreation Services
Attachments
900-1 Special Events
FY 2025-26 Special Events Calendar
FY 2025-26 Special Events Budget Estimate
Coastal Development Permit, Touch a Truck and Night Owl PGCC 3-5-25

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE

CITY COUNCIL POLICY
SUBJECT POLICY NO. EFFECTIVE DATE PAGE NO.

Special Events 900-1 February 16, 2011 1 of 3

PURPOSE
The intent of this policy is to provide guidance for the conduct of special events in the City and ensure an appropriate balance between the number and scope of special events with the ability of City neighborhoods and facilities to adequately handle such events.

POLICY
I. General
The City shall have the discretion to limit the number of special events in any fiscal year.

All special events will be limited to those activities that benefit Pacific Grove residents or businesses.

Most special events are either one-time or annual. Certain special events, such as the Farmers' Market, are periodic and ongoing.

The Council reserves the right to take actions creating exceptions to this policy in the event of special circumstances.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Requirements
The ADA requires the City of Pacific Grove and public accommodations to provide equitable access for people with disabilities. Event organizers are expected follow ADA guidelines and provide and maintain access for people with disabilities. This may include providing a clear path of travel to and on sidewalks, curb cuts and restrooms; maintaining already-designated parking for people with disabilities, providing additional parking for people with disabilities if parking is provided; and providing accessible restrooms.

Non-Discrimination Policy
The City of Pacific Grove (City) requires that no person shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity on the grounds of race, color, sex, age, disability or national origin, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (P.L. 100.259) or due to breastfeeding in a public place, gender identity, marital status, political ideology, religion, sexual orientation, or military status or veteran status. The City of Pacific Grove also includes immigration status, ethnic background and Neurodivergent people, in its non-discrimination policy. The City further assures every effort will be made to ensure nondiscrimination and inclusivity in all of its programs and activities, whether those programs and activities are federally funded or not. Permitted special events must comply with the City's nondiscrimination policy and all applicable City, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.

PGCC 3-5-25

*Neurodivergent or ND refers to variations in the human brain and cognition, for instance in sociability, learning, attention, mood and other mental functions.

II. Types of Special Events
The City will create an annual calendar of special events. Events included in the annual calendar shall have first priority for the scheduled locations and times. Requests for inclusion in the annual calendar shall be submitted to the City by November 30th for any event to be held during the following fiscal year.

Such events will not be approved if they conflict with already approved events. Events requiring City Council approval are those that:
• Require City sponsorship or other City support;
• Preclude others from using an entire outdoor public facility (e.g., Caledonia Park); • Are likely to have a significant impact on substantial numbers of residents or businesses (e.g., closure of multiple or high-traffic streets for a significant amount of time, as determined by the City Manager); or
• Have other characteristics that warrant public consideration by the Council.

More limited events may be approved by staff. A neighborhood event, requiring closure only of a neighborhood street, for example, would not require Council approval. In these cases, those persons incurring the costs of the street closure are the same persons benefiting from the event.

III. Information Required
Each application for special events shall contain the following information:

A. A description of the proposed event.

B. A statement of the purpose of the event and its benefits to the City including actions of inclusivity that are reflective of the diverse community which we aim to be.

C. The name of the sponsoring organization.

D. The date, location, and time (to include preparation and clean up) of the event. In the case of a race or parade, a map of the proposed route shall be submitted.

E. An estimate of the number of participants and/or spectators.

F. A description of City facilities, support, and personnel required.

G. A list of personnel to be provided by the sponsor.

H. A description of parking arrangements for the event.

I. If electronic sound amplification equipment will be used, an application for the necessary permit shall be made as required by Chapter 11.94 of the Pacific Grove Municipal Code.

J. A description of the proposed refuse management and recycling program for plastics, glass, paper, and aluminum during the event.

K. A listing of accommodations provided by the sponsor pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act.

L. A listing of fees proposed to be charged, commercial sales, commercial filming, and the service or sale of food and/or alcohol.

III. Conditions of Permit
Once the Council approves an application, the sponsoring organization shall comply with the following conditions:

PGCC 3-5-25

A. At least 30 days prior to the event, furnish the City with a certificate of insurance in an amount not less than $2 million naming the City of Pacific Grove as an additional insured.

Such insurance shall be primary to any City insurance, and the City must have at least ten days’ notice of cancellation.

B. The sponsoring organization shall reimburse the City for all direct and incidental expenses for the use of the City personnel and facilities. The sponsor has the option of using volunteers or other non-City personnel for some functions (e.g., placing barricades, emptying public trash cans, etc.) Other functions (e.g., Police security) require City personnel. The City has the absolute discretion to determine the number of personnel who will be provided for a particular event.

C. The sponsor is responsible for all sign removal, litter control, clean-up activities, and for providing necessary containers and personnel for recycling activities, as determined by the City.

D. The sponsor shall provide portable restroom facilities if deemed necessary by the City and in compliance with the ADA.

E. The sponsor shall be advised that the sponsor is responsible for determining what, if any, accommodations are required of sponsor pursuant to the American with Disabilities Act.

F. An approved Special Event Application is required for all groups and shall be in the possession of the sponsor or representative at the event.

G. The City will review applications and additional approvals may be deemed necessary.

H. If amplification is to be used a deposit of $500 will need to be paid along with the application fee. If it is determined that amplification exceeds allowable levels or has locations have not been preapproved by City Staff then the deposit may not be returned.

The City of Pacific Grove reserves the right to revoke permissions for an event at any time.

IV. Event Classifications
The Council established the following classification of events to be used in determining the events scheduled for each calendar year: Special Events and City Sponsored Events.

Special Events: These are Special Events that require exclusive use of City property and require support from Police, Fire and / or Public Works. Special Events will be deemed full cost recovery
City Sponsored Events: These events include traditional events that are primarily hosted by the Chamber of Commerce, the School District, or the City and shall receive full City Support. These events will be noted annually on the Special Events Calendar for approval by the City Council.

PGCC 3-5-25

V. Review, Approval, and Scheduling of Events
All activities approved are authorized for the subsequent year only and, continued Council approval should not be assumed. Activities may be discontinued if they become too large or if they create problems that would substantially disrupt the peace and quiet of a neighborhood.

Should the City receive requests for more activities than may be accommodated, the City will establish an appropriate random drawing type of system or other suitable method for determining those activities to be approved.

Completed special event applications received by November 30 will be given priority for the upcoming fiscal year July 1 – June 30. Key dates for review and approval are:
• November – Recreation Department receives completed applications • December – Staff prepares recommendation
• January – Recreation Board prepares recommendation
• February – Council approves events, calendar, and city sponsorship • March – Staff publishes Special Events calendar
Completed special event applications received after November 30 (off-cycle) shall be considered if:

1. Not in conflict with approved special events or issued park/facility permit

2. Received a minimum 150 days in advance of the event

3. Off-cycle events brought forward for review will not be recommended as “City

4. Sponsored” special events.

Off-cycle applications will undergo the same review and approval process as for applications received by November 30.

Adopted: July 20, 2022 by Minute Order.

Adopted: July 6, 2022 by Minute Order
Adopted: April 16, 1986-Resolution No. 5705
Amended: January 7, 1987-Resolution No. 5787
Amended: February 5, 1992-Resolution No. 6238
Amended: March 3, 1993-Resolution No. 6331
Amended: November 15, 1995-Resolution No. 6489
Amended: November 5, 1997-Resolution No. 7-057
Amended: June 2, 2010-Resolution No. 10-044
Amended: February 16, 2011-Resolution No. 11-012
Amended: October 17, 2018 – Resolution 18-037
PGCC 3-5-25

PGCC 3-5-25

PGCC 3-5-25

PGCC 3-5-25

PGCC 3-5-25

PGCC 3-5-25

PGCC 3-5-25

Agenda No. 10 A

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk/DEI Coordinator
MEETING DATE: March 05, 2025
SUBJECT: Task Force on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Meeting Minutes: December 9, 2024 and January 13, 2025
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION
Receive minutes.

Attachments
DEI Minutes December 2024 and January 2025
PGCC 3-5-25

PGCC 3-5-25

PGCC 3-5-25

PGCC 3-5-25

PGCC 3-5-25

Agenda No. 11 A

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Matthew Mogensen, City Manager
MEETING DATE: March 05, 2025
SUBJECT: Fourth Public Hearing to Establish District Boundaries to Transition from the City of Pacific Grove City Council At-Large Election System to a District-Based City Council Election System and First Reading on an Ordinance Establishing District-Based Elections for Council Members, Adopting a District Boundary Map, and Assigning a sequence of Elections. This item to commence at 6:15 p.m.

CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378

RECOMMENDATION
Hold a Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Establishment of District Boundaries to Transition from an At-Large City Council Election System to a District-Based City Council Election System in accordance with California Elections Code § 10010

1. 2. Discuss method for voting on a preferred map

3. Select a map for inclusion in the ordinance to transition to district elections

4. Request the City Attorney read the title of the ordinance.

5. Motion to waive further reading of the ordinance.

Introduce and hold a first reading of an ordinance establishing district-based elections for Council Members by amending Pacific Grove Municipal Code Title 2 to add a new Chapter 2.70 (“district-based elections”), adopting a district boundary map and assigning a sequence of elections for the new districts

6. Direct that publication of the ordinance will be satisfied by publication of a summary approved by the City Attorney

7. 8. Take alternative action.

DISCUSSION

BACKGROUND
On October 2, 2024, the City Council considered and approved Resolution No. 24-042, declaring its intent to initiate procedures for a transition from at-large to district-based council member elections.

The staff report package and supporting materials can be accessed at this link.

The City of Pacific Grove currently has an at-large election system, which means that the electors for the entire City choose each of the six Council Members, and a directly elected Mayor. A district-based PGCC 3-5-25

election is one in which the city is geographically divided into separate districts, each with one Council Member who resides in the district and is chosen by the electors residing in that particular district. The office of the Mayor would still be directly elected by all voters of the City.

California Elections Code §10010 Requirements
California Elections Code §10010 provides the process of transitioning from at-large elections to by-district elections. Elections Code §10010 specifically applies to charter cities. The process includes:

1. A Resolution of Intent to Transition from At-Large Elections to By-district Elections;

2. First Public Hearing on composition of possible districts before draft maps are drawn Second Public Hearing no more than 30 days after First Public Hearing on composition of possible districts before draft maps are drawn

3. 4. Publication of Draft Maps and Election Sequence – at least 7 days prior to public hearing on maps

5. First Public Hearing on Draft Maps
Second Public Hearing on Draft Maps no more than 45 days after First Public Hearing on Draft Maps.

6. Final Public Hearing in connection with final adoption (Second Reading) of Ordinance to transition from at-large elections to by-district elections; Ordinance becomes effective 30 days after adoption.

7. To fulfill the requirements of California Elections Code §10010, the following timeline has been developed to complete the process by March 31, 2025.

October 2, 2024 – City Council Adopted Resolution 24-042, declaring its intent to initiate procedures for a transition from at-large to district-based council member elections.

November 20, 2024 – first public hearing on composition of possible districts before draft maps are drawn.

December 18, 2024 – second public hearing on composition of possible districts before draft maps are drawn.

January 8, 2025 – staff conducted a “community workshop” format meeting to educate residents on how to use the map drawing tools. The meeting was noticed as a special meeting of the City Council to allow Council Members to attend if they chose.

January 27, 2025 – deadline for submission of draft maps to be published with proposed sequencing of elections in the new districts for consideration at third public hearing.

February 5, 2025 – third public hearing on draft maps submitted by Pacific Grove residents and City’s demographic consultant.

February 24, 2025 – deadline for submission of draft maps or revised draft maps to be published with proposed sequencing of elections in the new districts to be considered at fourth public hearing.

March 5, 2025 – fourth public hearing on draft maps and revised maps submitted by Pacific Grove residents and City’s demographic consultant, and First Reading of an Ordinance to adopt a district map and final sequencing in which districts will be implemented in elections.

March 19, 2025 - second reading of the Ordinance adopting the district map and sequencing which districts will be implemented in elections.

At the first two public hearings the public was informed about the districting process and the community was provided with the opportunity to give feedback on what factors should be taken into consideration while creating district boundaries. The public was asked to provide input regarding communities of interest and other local factors that should be considered while drafting district maps.

PGCC 3-5-25

A community of interest is a neighborhood or group that would benefit from being in the same district because of shared interests, views, or characteristics. Possible community features include, but are not limited to:

A. School attendance areas.

B. Natural dividing lines such as major roads, hills, or highways.

C. Areas around parks and other neighborhood landmarks.

D. Common issues, neighborhood activities, or legislative/election concerns; and E. Shared demographic characteristics, such as:
(1) Similar levels of income, education, or linguistic insolation. (2) Languages spoken at home; and
(3) Single-family and multi-family housing unit areas.

Also discussed at the first two public hearings were the legal requirements in creating the district boundaries. These compliance mandates include the following state and federal criteria:

Legal Requirements - Federal:

1. Each council district shall contain a nearly equal population as required by law; and Each council district shall be drawn in a manner that complies with the Federal Voting Rights Act. No council district shall be drawn with race as the predominate factor in violation of the principles established by the United States Supreme Court in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), and its progeny. In connection with compliance with the federal Voting Rights Act, California law requires the City Council to determine whether it is possible to create an election district or districts in which a minority group is sufficiently large and geographically compact to constitute a majority in a single-member district, as set forth in Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30 (1986), and published on its redistricting web page the results of its analysis within seven days of completing the analysis or prior to adopting election district boundaries, whichever occurs first.

2. In accordance with Elections Code section 21130(b)(1), on January 24, 2025, the City posted on its districting webpage a report disclosing that it is not possible to create an election district or districts in which a minority group is sufficiently large and geographically compact to constitute a majority in a single-member district, as set forth in Thornburg v. Gingles (1986) 478 U.S. 30.

In addition to the federal criteria, California has adopted mandatory, prioritized criteria:

1. To the maximum extent practicable, election districts shall be geographically contiguous.

To the maximum extent practicable, and where it does not conflict with the preceding criterion, the geographic integrity of any local neighborhood or local community of interest shall be respected in a manner that minimizes its division. Communities of interest do not include relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates.

2. To the maximum extent practicable, and where it does not conflict with the preceding criteria, election districts shall be bounded by natural and artificial barriers, by streets, or by the boundaries of the local jurisdiction. Election district boundaries should be easily identifiable and understandable by residents.

3. To the maximum extent practicable, and where it does not conflict with the preceding criteria, election districts shall be drawn to encourage geographical compactness in a manner that nearby areas of population are not bypassed in favor of more distant populations.

4. The City Council shall not adopt election district boundaries for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against an incumbent, political candidate, or political party.

5. The City Council shall not adopt election district boundaries using any criterion that is prioritized over the criteria described above.

6. 7. Within 21 days of adopting final election district boundaries, the City Council shall issue a report PGCC 3-5-25

that explains the basis on which it made its decisions in achieving compliance with the requirements and criteria described above, including, as to each neighborhood or community of interest that was split into two or more districts, the reason for that split.

A charter city may adopted comprehensive or exclusive redistricting criteria in its city charter that include a requirement to keep whole either communities of interest or neighborhoods. The City of Pacific Grove has not adopted redistricting criteria in its charter.

Public Outreach
The City established a dedicated webpage for the District Elections Transition effort. This webpage contains all information (reports, hearing notices, presentations, mapping resources, etc.) and is found on the City’s website.

City staff has also made efforts to conduct outreach to the public to provide information on the City’s districting process, including the following:

September 4, 2024, agenda report and City Council discussion.

September 6, 2024 City Manager’s report newsletter article.

October 2, 2024, City Council discussion and declaration of intent to transition to district-based elections.

October 4, 2024, City Manager’s Report newsletter article.

October 16, 2024, City Manager’s Report newsletter article providing the schedule of hearings.

Public Hearing Notice for the November 20, 2024, Public Hearing was posted at City Hall and published in the Monterey County Weekly on November 7, 2024.

November 8, 2024, City Manager’s Report newsletter article providing notice of first hearing on November 20.

November 20, 2024, agenda report and City Council discussion.

November 22, 2024, City Manager’s Report newsletter article providing notice of second hearing on December 18, 2024.

Public Hearing Notice for the December 18, 2024, public hearing was posted at city hall and published in the Monterey County Weekly on December 5, 2024.

December 18, 2024, agenda report and City Council discussion.

December 20, 2024, City Manager’s Report newsletter article providing notice of public workshop on January 8, 2025 and information on where to find mapping resources.

December 30, 2024, post on City’s Nextdoor and Facebook informing residents of upcoming workshop on January 8, 2025, the hearing on February 5, 2025, and how to get involved.

A public workshop held on January 8, 2025, aimed at assisting residents with learning how to draws district boundary maps and answer questions.

January 17, 2025 City Manager’s report newsletter article providing information on where to find mapping resources.

Public Hearing Notice for the February 5, 2025, public hearing was posted at City Hall and published in the Monterey County Weekly on January 23, 2025.

February 7, 2025, City Manager’s report newsletter article providing information on where to find mapping resources and deadline to submit new maps.

Public Hearing Notice for the March 5, 2025, public hearing was posted at city hall and published in the Monterey County Weekly on February 20, 2025.

February 21, 2025, City Manager’s report newsletter article providing information on where to find mapping resources and deadline to submit new maps.

DISCUSSION
The purpose of this public hearing on March 5, 2025, is to consider draft maps; receive input from the community regarding the draft maps, district boundaries, and election sequencing.

PGCC 3-5-25

The City provided members of the public access to the paper map resource and an online map resource to create their proposed maps. The mapping resources with instructions have been provided on the City’s website on the District Elected Transition webpage, which can be found here.

To assist residents with learning how to draw district boundary maps and answer questions, staff held a public workshop on January 8, 2025. Approximately 15 – 20 residents were in attendance.

The community was encouraged to submit proposed maps by January 24, 2025, for consideration at the February 5, 2024, public hearing.

On February 5, 2025, the City Council held a public hearing to discuss the first group of 20 maps that were submitted by the demographer and members of the community. These 20 draft maps are listed below and can be found at the links provided. After public comment and deliberations, the City Council voted to indicate they are supportive of additional consideration of Maps 101, 108, 109, 118 and 119.

These five maps, in addition to all the first map submittals are attached to this report. All map submissions can be found at the links below.

The Interactive Review Tool linked herein provides a digital version of all maps. This tool allows you to overlay the maps on each other to compare and contrast the differences. Users can also view the attribute tables for each map and view all demographic characteristic information for that map.

The community was encouraged to submit another round of proposed maps by February 24, 2025, for consideration at the March 5, 2024, public hearing.

Draft Maps
The community was encouraged to submit proposed maps by February 24, 2025, for consideration at the March 5, 2024, public hearing. The list of proposed maps submitted appears below and are attached to this report. Additionally, these proposed maps were posted in compliance with the Elections Code § 10010 on Tuesday, February 25, 2025.

The proposed maps can also be viewed on an Interactive Review Tool linked herein and can be used to zoom in and out for additional detail and demographic data.

Maps submitted for February 5, 2025, City Council review:

Map 101 – Deviation 8.09%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Map 102 – Deviation 7.34%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Map 103 – Deviation 2.09%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Map 104 – Deviation 6.74%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Map 105 – Deviation 7.10%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Map 106 – District F is compact but not contiguous and therefore not viable as submitted.

Map 107 – District E is compact but not contiguous and therefore not viable as submitted.

Map 108 – Deviation 4.64%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Map 109 – Deviation 5.28%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Map 110 – Deviation 6.03%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Map 111 – Deviation 3.09%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Map 112 – Deviation 9.08%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Map 113 – Deviation 0.52%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Map 114 – Deviation 0.56%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Map 115 – Deviation 4.44%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Map 116 – Deviation 6.66%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

PGCC 3-5-25

Map 117 – Deviation 6.55%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Map 118 – Deviation 7.97%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Map 119 – Deviation 3.29%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Map 120 – Deviation 5.79%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Additional Maps submitted for March 5, 2025, City Council review Map 121 – Deviation 5.63%. The districts are compact and contiguous.

Sequencing Of District Elections
“Sequencing” means assigning to each district the election year in which that district seat will be up for election. The City Council deliberates about and assigns sequencing after selection of a districting plan for final adoption. Currently, three seats are up for Citywide election in the Gubernatorial election year; three seats are up for Citywide election in the Presidential election year.

Elections Code § 10010 has provisions for sequencing elections in the new districts:

The draft districting plans that are subject to the second round of public hearings must include a “potential” sequencing of elections for each draft plan. (Elec. Code § 10010(a)(2).) This assignment is only “potential.”

1. Elections Code § 10010(b) specifies two criteria for “consideration” in setting the final sequencing of elections. Those criteria are a) “consideration to the purposes of the California Voting Rights Act” and b) “tak[ing] into account the preferences expressed by members of the districts.” There is no judicial guidance about what either of these criteria means.

2. Regarding the first criterion, some California Voting Rights Act advocates contend this provision requires the district with a majority of citizens of voting age who are Latino to be placed on the ballot in the Presidential election cycle when Latino turnout may be higher. There is no such district in any draft plan for the City and, in any case, this approach could present potential constitutional issues.

Regarding the second criterion, most cities have interpreted it as a requirement that the City Council consider public comment about sequencing.

After complying with the statutory criteria, sequencing of elections in the finally adopted new districting plan is at the discretion of the City Council. Cities commonly consider:

a.) Completion of the terms of Council Members elected at-large. For example, a Council Member whose term ends in 2028 serves out the full four-year term even if that member resides in the same district as a Council Member whose term ends in 2026 and that district is on the 2026 ballot.
b.) Scheduling elections in a particular district based on the expiration of the term of office of the Council Member who resides in the district. For example, a district in which a Council Member resides with a term ending in 2026 could be placed on the ballot in 2026. A district in which two Council Members reside with respective terms ending in 2026 and in 2028 could be placed on the ballot in 2026 or 2028.

If in 2026, see subparagraph (a), above. Of course, the Council Member with a term ending in 2028 could run in 2026 and resign from his at-large seat if elected. The City Council would then make an appointment to fill the remaining two years of that term.

1. 2. If in 2028, the Council Member with a term ending in 2026 would be out of office after the 2026 PGCC 3-5-25

elections and a seat without a resident Council Member would be placed on the ballot in 2026. c.) Scheduling elections in a district in which no current Council Member resides at the earlier election cycle consistent with maintaining the appropriate number of Council Members. For example, if a district has two Council Members with terms ending in 2026 and that district is assigned an election cycle starting with 2026, a district without a resident Council Member would also be placed on the ballot in 2026. If there are two districts without resident Council Members (for example, if two Council Members with terms ending in 2028 are also paired in the same district), then only one of those districts would be placed on the ballot in 2026.

To reiterate, the City Council considers options and assigns sequencing after selection of a districting plan for final adoption. The City Council has conducted the process of designing district boundaries without regard to the residences of Council Members to remain in compliance with the mandatory criterion which prohibits adoption of election district boundaries for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against an incumbent, political candidate, or political party.

The final action of the City Council to transition to district-based elections will be to adopt the Second Reading of the Ordinance on March 19, 2025.

Proposed Process for Selection of a Preferred District Map Council Members Rau and Walkingstick have proposed using a Ranked Choice Voting system to assist the City Council with deliberating and selecting a preferred district map. Council Member Rau and Walkingstick will present the attached presentation regarding Ranked Choice Voting prior to City Council deliberations.

OPTIONS
Other action related to this item.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact resulting from the fourth public hearing.

FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.

Attachments
Maps 101-120
Map 121
Rank Choice Voting Presentation
Public Hearing 4 Presentation
Proposed Ordinance
PGCC 3-5-25

F
D
C
E
B
A
Pacific Grove
Golf Links
Asilomar State
Beach
Lovers Point
Park
George
Washington Park Hopkins Marine
Station Stanford
Shoreline Park
Berwick Park
Arnett Park
Espalade Park
Caledonia Park
Tennis Cts
Chase Park
Jewell Park
The Inn and
Links at Spanish
Bay
Higgins Park
Monterey Bay
Pacific Ocean
Point Pinos
Lighthouse
Forest Ave
Sunset Dr
Holman Hwy
Cedar St
Sinex Ave
Asilomar Ave
Lighthouse Ave
Junipero Ave
Pine Ave
Jewell Ave
Fountain
Ave
National Demographics Corporation, January 23, 2025
Pacific Grove 2025 Districting
©2021 CALIPER
PGCC 3-5-25

101
District A
Total Pop 2,443
Deviation from ideal -78
% Deviation -3.09%
% Hisp 10.8%
% NH White 77%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 6%
Total 1,941
% Hisp 4%
% NH White 88%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 5%
Total 1,919
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 14%
Total 1,347
% Latino est. 6%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 14%
Total 1,814
% Latino est. 6%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,357
age0-19 11%
age20-60 40%
age60plus 48%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 64%
english 86%
spanish 3%
asian-lang 4%
other lang 7%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 4%
hs-grad 37%
bachelor 34%
graduatedegree 25%
Child in Household child-under18 10%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 53%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 15%
income 50-75k 15%
income 75-200k 37%
income 200k-plus 23%
single family 66%
multi-family 34%
rented 54%
owned 46%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.

B
2,559
38 1.51%
13%
73%
1%
9%
1,892
7%
84%
2%
6%
1,737
7%
6%
2%
1%
87%
2%
1,225
6%
5%
2%
1%
88%
2%
1,577
7%
7%
2%
1%
88%
2%
2,292
18%
43%
40%
14%
74%
87%
2%
5%
7%
3%
39%
33%
25%
19%
52%
11%
14%
17%
39%
19%
67%
33%
48%
52%
C
2,564
43 1.71%
12%
75%
1%
8%
1,953
10%
81%
1%
6%
1,856
7%
7%
3%
1%
88%
1%
1,351
6%
5%
2%
1%
89%
1%
1,701
6%
6%
2%
1%
89%
1%
2,532
19%
48%
34%
12%
55%
87%
2%
5%
6%
1%
36%
29%
33%
21%
57%
11%
8%
16%
43%
21%
78%
22%
49%
51%
D
2,385
-136
-5.39%
15%
71%
2%
7%
2,060
7%
84%
1%
7%
1,618
10%
9%
3%
2%
82%
2%
1,135
8%
7%
2%
2%
85%
2%
1,518
8%
8%
2%
2%
84%
2%
2,642
15%
52%
33%
12%
52%
86%
4%
4%
6%
1%
34%
26%
36%
16%
59%
10%
10%
16%
44%
19%
65%
35%
60%
40%
E
2,589
68 2.70%
14%
68%
3%
11%
1,964
12%
78%
1%
9%
1,710
11%
10%
4%
1%
84%
0%
1,149
9%
8%
3%
1%
86%
1%
1,527
7%
7%
5%
1%
86%
1%
2,584
21%
41%
37%
14%
79%
79%
8%
2%
10%
4%
40%
30%
25%
24%
45%
6%
12%
11%
52%
18%
66%
34%
42%
58%
F
2,585
64 2.54%
22%
60%
2%
12%
2,000
23%
66%
1%
9%
1,669
12%
10%
5%
1%
83%
0%
1,102
10%
9%
4%
1%
85%
0%
1,478
12%
11%
3%
1%
84%
0%
2,696
23%
56%
22%
14%
81%
72%
13%
2%
12%
4%
45%
21%
24%
28%
60%
6%
14%
17%
47%
17%
65%
35%
50%
50%
Total
15,125
204

8.09%
14%
71%
2%
9%
11,809
11%
80%
2%
7%
10,509
9%
8%
3%
1%
83%
3%
7,310
7%
7%
3%
1%
85%
3%
9,615
8%
7%
3%
1%
84%
1%
15,105
18%
47%
35%
13%
68%
83%
5%
4%
8%
3%
38%
29%
28%
19%
54%
9%
12%
15%
44%
20%
68%
32%
51%
49%
01/23/2025 15:13 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
PGCC 3-5-25

F
C
D
E
A
B
Pacific Grove
Golf Links
Asilomar State
Beach
Lovers Point
Park
George
Washington Park Hopkins Marine
Station Stanford
el Carmelo Cmtry
Shoreline Park
Berwick Park
Arnett Park
Espalade Park
Caledonia Park
Tennis Cts
Chase Park
Jewell Park
The Inn and
Links at Spanish
Bay
Higgins Park
Monterey Bay
Pacific Ocean
Point Pinos
Lighthouse
Forest Ave
Sunset Dr
Holman Hwy
Cedar St
Sinex Ave
Asilomar Ave
Lighthouse Ave
Junipero Ave
1st
St
Jewell Ave
Fountain
Ave
National Demographics Corporation, January 23, 2025
Pacific Grove 2025 Districting
©2021 CALIPER
PGCC 3-5-25

102
District A
Total Pop 2,474
Deviation from ideal -47
% Deviation -1.86%
% Hisp 11.1%
% NH White 77%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 6%
Total 1,969
% Hisp 4%
% NH White 88%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 6%
Total 1,748
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 7%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 87%
% NH Black 2%
Total 1,228
% Latino est. 6%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 88%
% NH Black 2%
Total 1,675
% Latino est. 6%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 88%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,422
age0-19 11%
age20-60 41%
age60plus 48%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 61%
english 87%
spanish 4%
asian-lang 3%
other lang 6%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 4%
hs-grad 36%
bachelor 34%
graduatedegree 26%
Child in Household child-under18 10%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 54%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 14%
income 50-75k 14%
income 75-200k 38%
income 200k-plus 23%
single family 67%
multi-family 33%
rented 55%
owned 45%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.

B
2,460
-61
-2.42%
13%
72%
1%
9%
1,816
6%
85%
2%
6%
1,791
7%
6%
2%
1%
76%
14%
1,260
6%
6%
2%
1%
77%
14%
1,624
7%
7%
2%
1%
77%
1%
2,190
17%
42%
40%
14%
76%
86%
2%
5%
7%
4%
39%
34%
24%
19%
51%
12%
15%
16%
39%
19%
65%
35%
49%
51%
C
2,601
80 3.17%
12%
74%
1%
8%
1,923
12%
80%
2%
7%
1,851
7%
6%
3%
1%
88%
1%
1,340
6%
5%
2%
1%
89%
1%
1,719
6%
6%
2%
1%
89%
2%
2,503
18%
46%
35%
13%
55%
87%
2%
5%
6%
1%
36%
29%
32%
20%
57%
11%
8%
16%
43%
22%
80%
20%
48%
52%
D
2,416
-105
-4.17%
14%
73%
2%
7%
2,138
7%
85%
2%
6%
1,740
10%
9%
3%
2%
83%
2%
1,232
8%
7%
2%
2%
85%
2%
1,592
8%
8%
2%
2%
84%
2%
2,709
16%
53%
31%
11%
54%
85%
4%
5%
6%
1%
34%
26%
36%
18%
59%
10%
9%
17%
44%
19%
65%
35%
60%
40%
E
2,589
68 2.70%
14%
68%
3%
11%
1,964
12%
78%
1%
9%
1,710
11%
10%
4%
1%
84%
0%
1,149
9%
8%
3%
1%
86%
1%
1,527
7%
7%
5%
1%
86%
1%
2,584
21%
41%
37%
14%
79%
79%
8%
2%
10%
4%
40%
30%
25%
24%
45%
6%
12%
11%
52%
18%
66%
34%
42%
58%
F
2,585
64 2.54%
22%
60%
2%
12%
2,000
23%
66%
1%
9%
1,669
12%
10%
5%
1%
83%
0%
1,102
10%
9%
4%
1%
85%
0%
1,478
12%
11%
3%
1%
84%
0%
2,696
23%
56%
22%
14%
81%
72%
13%
2%
12%
4%
45%
21%
24%
28%
60%
6%
14%
17%
47%
17%
65%
35%
50%
50%
Total
15,125
185

7.34%
14%
71%
2%
9%
11,809
11%
80%
2%
7%
10,509
9%
8%
3%
1%
83%
3%
7,310
7%
7%
3%
1%
85%
3%
9,615
8%
7%
3%
1%
84%
1%
15,105
18%
47%
35%
13%
68%
83%
5%
4%
8%
3%
38%
29%
28%
19%
54%
9%
12%
15%
44%
20%
68%
32%
51%
49%
01/23/2025 15:39 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
PGCC 3-5-25

F
C
D
E
A
B
Pacific Grove
Golf Links
Asilomar State
Beach
Lovers Point
Park
George
Washington Park Hopkins Marine
Station Stanford
el Carmelo Cmtry
Shoreline Park
Berwick Park
Arnett Park
Espalade Park
Caledonia Park
Tennis Cts
Chase Park
Jewell Park
The Inn and
Links at Spanish
Bay
Higgins Park
Monterey Bay
Pacific Ocean
Point Pinos
Lighthouse
Forest Ave
Sunset Dr
Holman Hwy
Cedar St
Sinex Ave
Asilomar Ave
Lighthouse Ave
Junipero Ave
1st
St
Jewell Ave
Fountain
Ave
National Demographics Corporation, January 23, 2025
Pacific Grove 2025 Districting
©2021 CALIPER
PGCC 3-5-25

103
District A
Total Pop 2,527
Deviation from ideal 6
% Deviation 0.24%
% Hisp 11.1%
% NH White 77%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 6%
Total 2,006
% Hisp 4%
% NH White 88%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 6%
Total 1,781
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 7%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 86%
% NH Black 3%
Total 1,251
% Latino est. 6%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 88%
% NH Black 3%
Total 1,714
% Latino est. 6%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 87%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,476
age0-19 11%
age20-60 41%
age60plus 48%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 60%
english 87%
spanish 4%
asian-lang 3%
other lang 6%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 4%
hs-grad 36%
bachelor 34%
graduatedegree 26%
Child in Household child-under18 10%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 54%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 14%
income 50-75k 15%
income 75-200k 38%
income 200k-plus 23%
single family 67%
multi-family 33%
rented 55%
owned 45%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.

B
2,559
38 1.51%
13%
72%
2%
9%
1,883
6%
84%
2%
6%
1,843
7%
6%
2%
1%
76%
13%
1,297
6%
6%
2%
1%
77%
13%
1,657
7%
7%
2%
1%
77%
1%
2,284
18%
43%
40%
14%
76%
86%
2%
5%
7%
4%
39%
33%
24%
20%
51%
12%
14%
16%
39%
19%
65%
35%
49%
51%
C
2,486
-35
-1.39%
12%
74%
1%
8%
1,818
12%
80%
2%
6%
1,785
7%
6%
3%
1%
88%
1%
1,290
6%
5%
2%
1%
90%
1%
1,665
6%
6%
2%
1%
89%
1%
2,370
19%
46%
35%
13%
57%
88%
2%
5%
6%
1%
36%
30%
32%
21%
56%
11%
8%
16%
43%
22%
81%
19%
47%
53%
D
2,515
-6
-0.24%
14%
73%
2%
7%
2,226
7%
85%
2%
7%
1,789
10%
9%
3%
2%
83%
2%
1,267
8%
7%
2%
2%
85%
2%
1,623
8%
8%
2%
2%
84%
2%
2,817
16%
53%
30%
11%
53%
85%
4%
5%
6%
1%
34%
26%
37%
18%
59%
10%
9%
17%
44%
19%
66%
34%
60%
40%
E
2,521

0.00%
15%
67%
3%
11%
1,939
13%
77%
1%
8%
1,684
11%
10%
4%
1%
83%
0%
1,130
9%
8%
3%
1%
86%
0%
1,510
7%
7%
5%
1%
86%
1%
2,555
21%
42%
38%
14%
79%
78%
9%
2%
11%
4%
41%
29%
25%
23%
45%
6%
12%
11%
52%
18%
64%
36%
44%
56%
F
2,517
-4
-0.16%
21%
60%
2%
12%
1,937
23%
66%
1%
9%
1,627
12%
10%
5%
1%
83%
0%
1,075
11%
9%
4%
1%
85%
0%
1,446
12%
11%
3%
2%
84%
0%
2,604
23%
55%
22%
14%
81%
73%
12%
2%
12%
4%
45%
22%
24%
28%
60%
6%
13%
17%
47%
17%
66%
34%
49%
51%
Total
15,125
73 2.90%
14%
71%
2%
9%
11,809
11%
80%
2%
7%
10,509
9%
8%
3%
1%
83%
3%
7,310
7%
7%
3%
1%
85%
3%
9,615
8%
7%
3%
1%
84%
1%
15,105
18%
47%
35%
13%
68%
83%
5%
4%
8%
3%
38%
29%
28%
19%
54%
9%
12%
15%
44%
20%
68%
32%
51%
49%
01/23/2025 15:39 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
PGCC 3-5-25

F
C
D
E
A
B
Pacific Grove
Golf Links
Asilomar State
Beach
Lovers Point
Park
George
Washington Park Hopkins Marine
Station Stanford
el Carmelo Cmtry
Shoreline Park
Berwick Park
Arnett Park
Espalade Park
Caledonia Park
Tennis Cts
Chase Park
Jewell Park
The Inn and
Links at Spanish
Bay
Higgins Park
Monterey Bay
Pacific Ocean
Point Pinos
Lighthouse
Forest Ave
Sunset Dr
Holman Hwy
Cedar St
Sinex Ave
Asilomar Ave
Lighthouse Ave
Junipero Ave
Pine Ave
1st
St
Jewell Ave
Fountain
Ave
National Demographics Corporation, January 23, 2025
Pacific Grove 2025 Districting
©2021 CALIPER
PGCC 3-5-25

104
District A
Total Pop 2,479
Deviation from ideal -42
% Deviation -1.67%
% Hisp 11.4%
% NH White 78%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 5%
Total 2,056
% Hisp 5%
% NH White 88%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 5%
Total 1,739
% Latino est. 8%
% Spanish-Surnamed 7%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 85%
% NH Black 3%
Total 1,223
% Latino est. 6%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 87%
% NH Black 3%
Total 1,673
% Latino est. 6%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 87%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,549
age0-19 12%
age20-60 44%
age60plus 44%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 53%
english 88%
spanish 4%
asian-lang 2%
other lang 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 3%
hs-grad 37%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 27%
Child in Household child-under18 11%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 58%
income 0-25k 10%
income 25-50k 15%
income 50-75k 16%
income 75-200k 38%
income 200k-plus 20%
single family 64%
multi-family 36%
rented 61%
owned 39%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.

B
2,530
9 0.36%
14%
72%
1%
9%
1,843
3%
86%
3%
6%
1,788
7%
7%
2%
1%
76%
14%
1,252
7%
6%
2%
1%
77%
14%
1,615
8%
7%
2%
1%
77%
1%
2,178
13%
40%
47%
14%
76%
85%
1%
6%
8%
5%
37%
35%
24%
13%
49%
11%
16%
13%
38%
22%
67%
33%
48%
52%
C
2,454
-67
-2.66%
12%
75%
1%
9%
1,793
12%
78%
2%
7%
1,820
7%
6%
3%
1%
87%
2%
1,304
6%
5%
2%
1%
89%
2%
1,691
6%
6%
2%
1%
89%
2%
2,273
20%
45%
35%
13%
63%
90%
2%
4%
4%
2%
36%
30%
31%
23%
55%
11%
6%
16%
44%
22%
82%
18%
43%
57%
D
2,624
103

4.09%
13%
73%
2%
8%
2,241
8%
84%
1%
7%
1,851
9%
8%
3%
1%
85%
1%
1,327
7%
7%
2%
1%
86%
1%
1,680
8%
8%
2%
1%
85%
1%
2,946
18%
53%
28%
11%
55%
84%
3%
6%
7%
1%
35%
26%
36%
21%
58%
11%
8%
18%
44%
19%
68%
32%
57%
43%
E
2,521

0.00%
15%
67%
3%
11%
1,939
13%
77%
1%
8%
1,684
11%
10%
4%
1%
83%
0%
1,130
9%
8%
3%
1%
86%
0%
1,510
7%
7%
5%
1%
86%
1%
2,555
21%
42%
38%
14%
79%
78%
9%
2%
11%
4%
41%
29%
25%
23%
45%
6%
12%
11%
52%
18%
64%
36%
44%
56%
F
2,517
-4
-0.16%
21%
60%
2%
12%
1,937
23%
66%
1%
9%
1,627
12%
10%
5%
1%
83%
0%
1,075
11%
9%
4%
1%
85%
0%
1,446
12%
11%
3%
2%
84%
0%
2,604
23%
55%
22%
14%
81%
73%
12%
2%
12%
4%
45%
22%
24%
28%
60%
6%
13%
17%
47%
17%
66%
34%
49%
51%
Total
15,125
170

6.74%
14%
71%
2%
9%
11,809
11%
80%
2%
7%
10,509
9%
8%
3%
1%
83%
3%
7,310
7%
7%
3%
1%
85%
3%
9,615
8%
7%
3%
1%
84%
1%
15,105
18%
47%
35%
13%
68%
83%
5%
4%
8%
3%
38%
29%
28%
19%
54%
9%
12%
15%
44%
20%
68%
32%
51%
49%
01/23/2025 15:40 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
PGCC 3-5-25

F
D
C
E
A
B
Pacific Grove
Golf Links
Asilomar State
Beach
Lovers Point
Park
George
Washington Park Hopkins Marine
Station Stanford
el Carmelo Cmtry
Shoreline Park
Berwick Park
Arnett Park
Espalade Park
Caledonia Park
Tennis Cts
Chase Park
Jewell Park
The Inn and
Links at Spanish
Bay
Higgins Park
Monterey Bay
Pacific Ocean
Point Pinos
Lighthouse
Forest Ave
Sunset Dr
Holman Hwy
Cedar St
Sinex Ave
Asilomar Ave
Lighthouse Ave
Junipero Ave
Pine Ave
1st
St
Jewell Ave
Fountain
Ave
National Demographics Corporation, January 23, 2025
Pacific Grove 2025 Districting
©2021 CALIPER
PGCC 3-5-25

105
District A
Total Pop 2,479
Deviation from ideal -42
% Deviation -1.67%
% Hisp 11.4%
% NH White 78%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 5%
Total 2,056
% Hisp 5%
% NH White 88%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 5%
Total 1,739
% Latino est. 8%
% Spanish-Surnamed 7%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 85%
% NH Black 3%
Total 1,223
% Latino est. 6%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 87%
% NH Black 3%
Total 1,673
% Latino est. 6%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 87%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,549
age0-19 12%
age20-60 44%
age60plus 44%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 53%
english 88%
spanish 4%
asian-lang 2%
other lang 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 3%
hs-grad 37%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 27%
Child in Household child-under18 11%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 58%
income 0-25k 10%
income 25-50k 15%
income 50-75k 16%
income 75-200k 38%
income 200k-plus 20%
single family 64%
multi-family 36%
rented 61%
owned 39%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.

B
2,530
9 0.36%
14%
72%
1%
9%
1,843
3%
86%
3%
6%
1,788
7%
7%
2%
1%
76%
14%
1,252
7%
6%
2%
1%
77%
14%
1,615
8%
7%
2%
1%
77%
1%
2,178
13%
40%
47%
14%
76%
85%
1%
6%
8%
5%
37%
35%
24%
13%
49%
11%
16%
13%
38%
22%
67%
33%
48%
52%
C
2,597
76 3.01%
12%
75%
1%
9%
1,890
12%
78%
2%
7%
1,935
7%
6%
3%
1%
87%
2%
1,382
6%
5%
2%
1%
88%
2%
1,792
6%
6%
2%
1%
88%
2%
2,408
20%
45%
35%
13%
64%
90%
2%
4%
4%
2%
36%
30%
31%
23%
55%
12%
6%
16%
44%
22%
81%
19%
43%
57%
D
2,624
103

4.09%
13%
73%
2%
8%
2,241
8%
84%
1%
7%
1,851
9%
8%
3%
1%
85%
1%
1,327
7%
7%
2%
1%
86%
1%
1,680
8%
8%
2%
1%
85%
1%
2,946
18%
53%
28%
11%
55%
84%
3%
6%
7%
1%
35%
26%
36%
21%
58%
11%
8%
18%
44%
19%
68%
32%
57%
43%
E
2,445
-76
-3.01%
14%
67%
3%
12%
1,878
12%
78%
1%
9%
1,615
11%
10%
4%
1%
83%
0%
1,082
9%
8%
4%
1%
86%
0%
1,446
7%
7%
5%
1%
86%
0%
2,459
21%
41%
38%
14%
80%
78%
9%
2%
11%
4%
41%
29%
25%
23%
45%
6%
13%
11%
52%
18%
65%
35%
43%
57%
F
2,450
-71
-2.82%
22%
59%
2%
12%
1,901
24%
65%
1%
9%
1,581
12%
10%
5%
1%
83%
0%
1,043
10%
9%
4%
1%
85%
0%
1,409
12%
11%
3%
1%
83%
0%
2,564
23%
56%
22%
14%
81%
72%
13%
2%
12%
4%
45%
21%
24%
28%
60%
6%
14%
17%
47%
17%
64%
36%
51%
49%
Total
15,125
179

7.10%
14%
71%
2%
9%
11,809
11%
80%
2%
7%
10,509
9%
8%
3%
1%
83%
3%
7,310
7%
7%
3%
1%
85%
3%
9,615
8%
7%
3%
1%
84%
1%
15,105
18%
47%
35%
13%
68%
83%
5%
4%
8%
3%
38%
29%
28%
19%
54%
9%
12%
15%
44%
20%
68%
32%
51%
49%
01/23/2025 15:41 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
PGCC 3-5-25

D
F
C
E
B
A
Pacific Grove
Golf Links
Asilomar State
Beach
Lovers Point
Park
George
Washington Park Hopkins Marine
Station Stanford
el Carmelo Cmtry
Shoreline Park
Arnett Park
Espalade Park
Caledonia Park
Tennis Cts
Chase Park
Jewell Park
The Inn and
Links at Spanish
Bay
Higgins Park
Monterey Bay
Pacific Ocean
Point Pinos
Lighthouse
Forest Ave
Sunset Dr
Holman Hwy
Cedar St
Sinex Ave
Asilomar Ave
Lighthouse Ave
Junipero Ave
Pine Ave
1st
St
Jewell Ave
Fountain
Ave
National Demographics Corporation, January 23, 2025
Pacific Grove 2025 Districting
Not contiguous
©2021 CALIPER
PGCC 3-5-25

106
District A
Total Pop 2,523
Deviation from ideal 2
% Deviation 0.08%
% Hisp 12.9%
% NH White 72%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 8%
Total 1,889
% Hisp 2%
% NH White 88%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 6%
Total 1,814
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 7%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 14%
Total 1,267
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 14%
Total 1,659
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,228
age0-19 13%
age20-60 39%
age60plus 48%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 78%
english 84%
spanish 2%
asian-lang 5%
other lang 9%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 5%
hs-grad 38%
bachelor 36%
graduatedegree 22%
Child in Household child-under18 13%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 49%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 17%
income 50-75k 14%
income 75-200k 35%
income 200k-plus 22%
single family 65%
multi-family 35%
rented 49%
owned 51%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.

B
2,538
17 0.67%
12%
76%
2%
6%
2,075
7%
85%
2%
6%
1,807
8%
7%
2%
2%
85%
2%
1,280
6%
5%
2%
2%
87%
3%
1,705
7%
7%
2%
1%
86%
2%
2,602
13%
46%
42%
13%
50%
89%
4%
2%
5%
2%
37%
30%
30%
12%
60%
10%
13%
15%
41%
21%
68%
32%
58%
42%
C
2,533
12 0.48%
12%
75%
1%
9%
1,806
12%
79%
2%
7%
1,812
7%
6%
3%
1%
87%
2%
1,293
6%
5%
2%
1%
88%
2%
1,667
6%
6%
2%
1%
89%
2%
2,302
20%
43%
37%
14%
64%
90%
2%
4%
4%
2%
36%
31%
30%
23%
54%
11%
7%
17%
44%
21%
80%
20%
45%
55%
D
2,493
-28
-1.11%
13%
73%
2%
8%
2,162
8%
85%
1%
6%
1,765
9%
8%
3%
1%
84%
1%
1,265
8%
7%
3%
1%
86%
1%
1,628
8%
8%
2%
2%
85%
1%
2,815
18%
54%
28%
11%
55%
83%
3%
7%
7%
1%
35%
25%
36%
21%
58%
11%
8%
18%
44%
19%
67%
33%
58%
42%
E
2,527
6 0.24%
23%
59%
3%
11%
2,080
24%
66%
1%
7%
1,513
11%
10%
4%
1%
84%
0%
1,013
8%
7%
3%
1%
87%
0%
1,379
10%
9%
4%
1%
84%
1%
2,755
19%
49%
32%
13%
80%
73%
14%
2%
11%
3%
44%
26%
23%
25%
50%
6%
13%
15%
50%
17%
57%
43%
56%
44%
F
2,511
-10
-0.40%
13%
68%
2%
12%
1,796
11%
77%
1%
10%
1,798
11%
10%
5%
1%
83%
0%
1,192
11%
10%
4%
1%
84%
0%
1,577
9%
8%
4%
1%
85%
0%
2,403
25%
48%
27%
15%
81%
78%
7%
2%
13%
5%
42%
25%
26%
26%
55%
6%
13%
12%
50%
18%
74%
26%
36%
64%
Total
15,125
45 1.79%
14%
71%
2%
9%
11,809
11%
80%
2%
7%
10,509
9%
8%
3%
1%
83%
3%
7,310
7%
7%
3%
1%
85%
3%
9,615
8%
7%
3%
1%
84%
1%
15,105
18%
47%
35%
13%
68%
83%
5%
4%
8%
3%
38%
29%
28%
19%
54%
9%
12%
15%
44%
20%
68%
32%
51%
49%
01/23/2025 15:41 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
PGCC 3-5-25

F
C
D
E
B
A
Pacific Grove
Golf Links
Asilomar State
Beach
Lovers Point
Park
George
Washington Park Hopkins Marine
Station Stanford
Shoreline Park
Berwick Park
Espalade Park
Caledonia Park
Tennis Cts
Chase Park
Jewell Park
The Inn and
Links at Spanish
Bay
Higgins Park
Monterey Bay
Pacific Ocean
Point Pinos
Lighthouse
Forest Ave
Sunset Dr
Holman Hwy
Sinex Ave
Asilomar Ave
Lighthouse Ave
Junipero Ave
Pine Ave
1st
St
Jewell Ave
Fountain
Ave
National Demographics Corporation, January 23, 2025
Pacific Grove 2025 Districting
Not contiguous
©2021 CALIPER
PGCC 3-5-25

107
District A
Total Pop 2,565
Deviation from ideal 44
% Deviation 1.75%
% Hisp 12.7%
% NH White 72%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 9%
Total 1,910
% Hisp 3%
% NH White 86%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 7%
Total 1,911
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 7%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 13%
Total 1,338
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black 13%
Total 1,749
% Latino est. 6%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 79%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,258
age0-19 14%
age20-60 40%
age60plus 46%
immigrants 14%
naturalized 78%
english 85%
spanish 2%
asian-lang 6%
other lang 8%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 5%
hs-grad 38%
bachelor 35%
graduatedegree 23%
Child in Household child-under18 14%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 49%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 16%
income 50-75k 14%
income 75-200k 37%
income 200k-plus 22%
single family 66%
multi-family 34%
rented 47%
owned 53%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.

B
2,417
-104
-4.13%
12%
78%
2%
5%
2,072
5%
88%
2%
5%
1,716
8%
7%
2%
2%
84%
3%
1,207
6%
6%
2%
2%
87%
3%
1,625
7%
7%
2%
1%
86%
2%
2,533
12%
47%
42%
13%
51%
88%
4%
2%
5%
2%
36%
30%
31%
11%
59%
10%
13%
16%
41%
20%
64%
36%
62%
38%
C
2,577
56 2.22%
14%
72%
1%
8%
2,129
10%
82%
0%
7%
1,798
9%
8%
2%
2%
86%
1%
1,275
7%
6%
2%
1%
88%
1%
1,661
8%
8%
1%
2%
86%
1%
2,817
18%
49%
32%
11%
60%
87%
3%
4%
7%
1%
36%
28%
33%
19%
60%
10%
9%
18%
40%
23%
72%
28%
52%
48%
D
2,528
7 0.28%
12%
75%
1%
9%
1,823
11%
81%
3%
6%
1,773
7%
6%
3%
1%
87%
2%
1,286
6%
6%
3%
1%
88%
2%
1,624
6%
6%
2%
1%
87%
2%
2,338
20%
47%
34%
14%
58%
86%
2%
7%
5%
2%
36%
29%
32%
23%
52%
12%
7%
17%
47%
18%
78%
22%
49%
51%
E
2,468
-53
-2.10%
13%
70%
2%
10%
1,868
10%
82%
0%
8%
1,737
11%
10%
4%
1%
83%
0%
1,167
9%
8%
4%
1%
86%
0%
1,566
7%
7%
4%
1%
87%
0%
2,478
21%
41%
38%
14%
79%
78%
9%
2%
11%
4%
41%
30%
25%
23%
45%
6%
12%
11%
52%
18%
65%
35%
43%
57%
F
2,570
49 1.94%
23%
57%
3%
12%
2,009
25%
62%
2%
9%
1,574
12%
10%
5%
1%
83%
0%
1,038
10%
9%
4%
1%
85%
0%
1,390
12%
11%
4%
1%
82%
1%
2,681
23%
55%
22%
14%
81%
72%
13%
2%
12%
4%
45%
21%
24%
28%
60%
6%
14%
17%
47%
17%
65%
35%
50%
50%
Total
15,125
160

6.35%
14%
71%
2%
9%
11,809
11%
80%
2%
7%
10,509
9%
8%
3%
1%
83%
3%
7,310
7%
7%
3%
1%
85%
3%
9,615
8%
7%
3%
1%
84%
1%
15,105
18%
47%
35%
13%
68%
83%
5%
4%
8%
3%
38%
29%
28%
19%
54%
9%
12%
15%
44%
20%
68%
32%
51%
49%
01/23/2025 15:42 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
PGCC 3-5-25

F
C
B
E
D
A
Pacific Grove
Golf Links
Asilomar State
Beach
Lovers Point
Park
George
Washington Park Hopkins Marine
Station Stanford
el Carmelo Cmtry
Shoreline Park
Berwick Park
Espalade Park
Caledonia Park
Tennis Cts
Chase Park
Jewell Park
The Inn and
Links at Spanish
Bay
Higgins Park
Monterey Bay
Pacific Ocean
Point Pinos
Lighthouse
Forest Ave
Sunset Dr
Holman Hwy
Cedar St
Asilomar Ave
Lighthouse Ave
Junipero Ave
Pine Ave
1st
St
Jewell Ave
Fountain
Ave
National Demographics Corporation, January 23, 2025
Pacific Grove 2025 Districting
©2021 CALIPER
PGCC 3-5-25

108
District A
Total Pop 2,561
Deviation from ideal 40
% Deviation 1.59%
% Hisp 13.0%
% NH White 72%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 8%
Total 1,918
% Hisp 2%
% NH White 88%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 6%
Total 1,804
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 7%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 14%
Total 1,260
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 14%
Total 1,652
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 7%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,268
age0-19 13%
age20-60 39%
age60plus 48%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 78%
english 84%
spanish 2%
asian-lang 5%
other lang 9%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 5%
hs-grad 38%
bachelor 36%
graduatedegree 22%
Child in Household child-under18 13%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 50%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 17%
income 50-75k 14%
income 75-200k 35%
income 200k-plus 22%
single family 65%
multi-family 35%
rented 49%
owned 51%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.

B
2,448
-73
-2.90%
12%
76%
2%
8%
1,789
11%
80%
2%
6%
1,737
7%
6%
3%
1%
87%
2%
1,232
5%
5%
2%
2%
88%
2%
1,591
6%
6%
1%
1%
88%
2%
2,301
19%
43%
38%
13%
65%
90%
2%
4%
4%
3%
37%
31%
28%
20%
54%
11%
9%
18%
42%
20%
73%
27%
48%
52%
C
2,565
44 1.75%
11%
77%
1%
7%
2,049
8%
84%
2%
6%
1,909
7%
6%
2%
1%
88%
2%
1,382
6%
5%
2%
1%
89%
2%
1,795
6%
6%
2%
1%
88%
2%
2,590
16%
47%
36%
13%
53%
87%
3%
5%
6%
1%
36%
29%
32%
17%
57%
11%
10%
16%
43%
21%
73%
27%
53%
47%
D
2,513
-8
-0.32%
14%
72%
2%
7%
2,176
7%
85%
1%
7%
1,748
10%
9%
3%
2%
82%
2%
1,232
8%
7%
2%
2%
85%
2%
1,621
8%
8%
2%
2%
83%
2%
2,787
16%
53%
32%
12%
51%
86%
4%
5%
6%
1%
34%
26%
36%
17%
59%
10%
9%
17%
44%
19%
66%
34%
60%
40%
E
2,511
-10
-0.40%
13%
70%
2%
11%
1,829
8%
82%
1%
9%
1,785
11%
10%
4%
1%
83%
0%
1,202
10%
9%
4%
1%
86%
0%
1,584
7%
7%
5%
1%
86%
0%
2,407
22%
37%
41%
14%
79%
81%
6%
2%
11%
4%
39%
31%
26%
22%
43%
6%
12%
9%
54%
19%
71%
29%
35%
65%
F
2,527
6 0.24%
23%
57%
3%
12%
2,047
27%
62%
2%
9%
1,526
12%
11%
4%
1%
83%
0%
1,003
10%
9%
4%
1%
86%
0%
1,372
12%
12%
2%
1%
83%
1%
2,751
22%
58%
20%
14%
81%
70%
15%
3%
12%
4%
47%
20%
23%
29%
61%
6%
14%
19%
46%
16%
59%
41%
58%
42%
Total
15,125
117

4.64%
14%
71%
2%
9%
11,809
11%
80%
2%
7%
10,509
9%
8%
3%
1%
83%
3%
7,310
7%
7%
3%
1%
85%
3%
9,615
8%
7%
3%
1%
84%
1%
15,105
18%
47%
35%
13%
68%
83%
5%
4%
8%
3%
38%
29%
28%
19%
54%
9%
12%
15%
44%
20%
68%
32%
51%
49%
01/23/2025 15:43 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
PGCC 3-5-25

F
C D
E
B
A
Pacific Grove
Golf Links
Asilomar State
Beach
Lovers Point
Park
George
Washington Park Hopkins Marine
Station Stanford
el Carmelo Cmtry
Shoreline Park
Berwick Park
Espalade Park
Caledonia Park
Tennis Cts
Chase Park
Jewell Park
The Inn and
Links at Spanish
Bay
Higgins Park
Monterey Bay
Pacific Ocean
Point Pinos
Lighthouse
Forest Ave
Sunset Dr
Holman Hwy
Cedar St
Sinex Ave
Asilomar Ave
Lighthouse Ave
Junipero Ave
Pine Ave
Jewell Ave
Fountain
Ave
National Demographics Corporation, January 23, 2025
Pacific Grove 2025 Districting
©2021 CALIPER
PGCC 3-5-25

109
District A
Total Pop 2,458
Deviation from ideal -63
% Deviation -2.50%
% Hisp 12.9%
% NH White 73%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 8%
Total 1,874
% Hisp 3%
% NH White 88%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 6%
Total 1,761
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 7%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 14%
Total 1,232
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 14%
Total 1,614
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,267
age0-19 12%
age20-60 39%
age60plus 49%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 73%
english 85%
spanish 3%
asian-lang 4%
other lang 8%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 5%
hs-grad 38%
bachelor 36%
graduatedegree 23%
Child in Household child-under18 12%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 51%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 16%
income 50-75k 15%
income 75-200k 35%
income 200k-plus 23%
single family 65%
multi-family 35%
rented 51%
owned 49%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.

B
2,492
-29
-1.15%
12%
74%
1%
8%
1,831
9%
81%
2%
6%
1,780
7%
6%
3%
1%
87%
2%
1,260
6%
5%
2%
1%
88%
2%
1,635
7%
7%
2%
1%
88%
2%
2,275
19%
43%
38%
13%
71%
88%
2%
4%
5%
3%
38%
32%
27%
21%
53%
12%
11%
17%
41%
20%
72%
28%
46%
54%
C
2,546
25 0.99%
12%
74%
1%
8%
1,945
11%
82%
1%
6%
1,869
8%
7%
3%
1%
87%
1%
1,362
6%
6%
2%
1%
89%
1%
1,702
7%
7%
2%
1%
88%
1%
2,564
19%
49%
33%
12%
55%
85%
2%
6%
7%
1%
36%
28%
33%
21%
57%
11%
8%
16%
44%
21%
77%
23%
50%
50%
D
2,591
70 2.78%
13%
74%
2%
6%
2,282
5%
86%
2%
6%
1,788
10%
9%
2%
2%
82%
3%
1,252
7%
7%
2%
2%
85%
3%
1,708
7%
7%
2%
2%
84%
2%
2,840
13%
52%
35%
12%
49%
87%
4%
4%
5%
2%
34%
27%
36%
14%
60%
10%
10%
16%
44%
19%
64%
36%
63%
37%
E
2,509
-12
-0.48%
13%
70%
2%
11%
1,834
8%
82%
1%
9%
1,787
11%
10%
4%
1%
83%
0%
1,203
10%
9%
4%
1%
86%
0%
1,595
7%
7%
5%
1%
86%
0%
2,405
22%
37%
41%
14%
79%
81%
6%
2%
11%
4%
39%
31%
26%
22%
43%
6%
12%
9%
54%
19%
71%
29%
35%
65%
F
2,529
8 0.32%
23%
57%
3%
12%
2,042
27%
62%
1%
9%
1,524
12%
11%
4%
1%
83%
0%
1,002
10%
9%
4%
1%
86%
0%
1,361
12%
11%
3%
1%
83%
1%
2,753
22%
58%
20%
14%
81%
70%
15%
3%
12%
4%
47%
20%
23%
29%
61%
6%
14%
19%
46%
16%
59%
41%
58%
42%
Total
15,125
133

5.28%
14%
71%
2%
9%
11,809
11%
80%
2%
7%
10,509
9%
8%
3%
1%
83%
3%
7,310
7%
7%
3%
1%
85%
3%
9,615
8%
7%
3%
1%
84%
1%
15,105
18%
47%
35%
13%
68%
83%
5%
4%
8%
3%
38%
29%
28%
19%
54%
9%
12%
15%
44%
20%
68%
32%
51%
49%
01/23/2025 15:44 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
PGCC 3-5-25

C
E
F
D
A
B
Pacific Grove
Golf Links
Asilomar State
Beach
Lovers Point
Park
George
Washington Park Hopkins Marine
Station Stanford
el Carmelo Cmtry
Shoreline Park
Arnett Park
Espalade Park
Caledonia Park
Tennis Cts
Chase Park
Jewell Park
The Inn and
Links at Spanish
Bay
Higgins Park
Monterey Bay
Pacific Ocean
Point Pinos
Lighthouse
Forest Ave
Sunset Dr
Holman Hwy
Cedar St
Sinex Ave
Asilomar Ave
Junipero Ave
Pine Ave
1st
St
Jewell Ave
Fountain
Ave
National Demographics Corporation, January 23, 2025
Pacific Grove 2025 Districting
©2021 CALIPER
PGCC 3-5-25

110
District A
Total Pop 2,518
Deviation from ideal -3
% Deviation -0.12%
% Hisp 11.9%
% NH White 76%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 6%
Total 2,298
% Hisp 4%
% NH White 87%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 7%
Total 1,772
% Latino est. 9%
% Spanish-Surnamed 8%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 84%
% NH Black 3%
Total 1,246
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 86%
% NH Black 3%
Total 1,695
% Latino est. 6%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 86%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,773
age0-19 12%
age20-60 52%
age60plus 36%
immigrants 12%
naturalized 48%
english 89%
spanish 5%
asian-lang 3%
other lang 4%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 2%
hs-grad 34%
bachelor 26%
graduatedegree 36%
Child in Household child-under18 12%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61%
income 0-25k 10%
income 25-50k 11%
income 50-75k 17%
income 75-200k 43%
income 200k-plus 20%
single family 61%
multi-family 39%
rented 65%
owned 35%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.

B
2,525
4 0.16%
12%
73%
2%
8%
1,890
6%
84%
3%
6%
1,961
7%
6%
2%
1%
76%
14%
1,377
7%
6%
2%
1%
76%
14%
1,806
6%
6%
1%
1%
78%
2%
2,277
17%
41%
42%
13%
78%
86%
2%
5%
7%
5%
38%
34%
24%
18%
51%
12%
14%
14%
39%
21%
67%
33%
45%
55%
C
2,514
-7
-0.28%
13%
74%
1%
8%
1,819
11%
81%
2%
5%
1,827
8%
7%
3%
1%
86%
1%
1,322
7%
6%
3%
1%
87%
1%
1,681
7%
7%
2%
1%
86%
1%
2,435
19%
49%
32%
13%
52%
83%
2%
9%
7%
1%
36%
28%
33%
22%
53%
11%
8%
16%
47%
17%
77%
23%
52%
48%
D
2,530
9 0.36%
13%
74%
1%
8%
1,925
9%
83%
1%
7%
1,638
7%
6%
2%
1%
89%
1%
1,161
6%
5%
2%
1%
90%
1%
1,477
8%
8%
2%
1%
88%
1%
2,461
17%
41%
43%
12%
70%
88%
2%
2%
7%
3%
37%
34%
25%
16%
57%
11%
13%
17%
34%
25%
74%
26%
46%
54%
E
2,595
74 2.94%
24%
59%
3%
10%
2,154
25%
66%
1%
6%
1,579
11%
10%
4%
1%
84%
0%
1,056
8%
7%
3%
1%
87%
0%
1,443
9%
9%
3%
1%
85%
1%
2,860
20%
51%
29%
13%
80%
72%
15%
2%
11%
3%
45%
25%
23%
27%
53%
6%
13%
17%
49%
16%
56%
44%
59%
41%
F
2,443
-78
-3.09%
12%
68%
2%
13%
1,722
9%
78%
1%
12%
1,732
11%
10%
5%
1%
83%
0%
1,149
11%
10%
4%
1%
84%
0%
1,513
10%
9%
5%
1%
84%
0%
2,298
25%
45%
31%
15%
81%
79%
6%
2%
13%
5%
41%
27%
27%
25%
52%
6%
13%
11%
51%
19%
75%
25%
33%
67%
Total
15,125
152

6.03%
14%
71%
2%
9%
11,809
11%
80%
2%
7%
10,509
9%
8%
3%
1%
83%
3%
7,310
7%
7%
3%
1%
85%
3%
9,615
8%
7%
3%
1%
84%
1%
15,105
18%
47%
35%
13%
68%
83%
5%
4%
8%
3%
38%
29%
28%
19%
54%
9%
12%
15%
44%
20%
68%
32%
51%
49%
01/23/2025 15:44 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
PGCC 3-5-25

C
E
D
F
A
B
Pacific Grove
Golf Links
Asilomar State
Beach
Lovers Point
Park
George
Washington Park Hopkins Marine
Station Stanford
el Carmelo Cmtry
Shoreline Park
Espalade Park
Caledonia Park
Tennis Cts
Chase Park
Jewell Park
The Inn and
Links at Spanish
Bay
Higgins Park
Monterey Bay
Pacific Ocean
Point Pinos
Lighthouse
Forest Ave
Sunset Dr
Holman Hwy
Cedar St
Sinex Ave
Asilomar Ave
Junipero Ave
Pine Ave
1st
St
Jewell Ave
Fountain
Ave
National Demographics Corporation, January 23, 2025
Pacific Grove 2025 Districting
©2021 CALIPER
PGCC 3-5-25

111
District A
Total Pop 2,518
Deviation from ideal -3
% Deviation -0.12%
% Hisp 11.9%
% NH White 76%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 6%
Total 2,298
% Hisp 4%
% NH White 87%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 7%
Total 1,772
% Latino est. 9%
% Spanish-Surnamed 8%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 84%
% NH Black 3%
Total 1,246
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 86%
% NH Black 3%
Total 1,695
% Latino est. 6%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 86%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,773
age0-19 12%
age20-60 52%
age60plus 36%
immigrants 12%
naturalized 48%
english 89%
spanish 5%
asian-lang 3%
other lang 4%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 2%
hs-grad 34%
bachelor 26%
graduatedegree 36%
Child in Household child-under18 12%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61%
income 0-25k 10%
income 25-50k 11%
income 50-75k 17%
income 75-200k 43%
income 200k-plus 20%
single family 61%
multi-family 39%
rented 65%
owned 35%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.

B
2,525
4 0.16%
12%
73%
2%
8%
1,890
6%
84%
3%
6%
1,961
7%
6%
2%
1%
76%
14%
1,377
7%
6%
2%
1%
76%
14%
1,806
6%
6%
1%
1%
78%
2%
2,277
17%
41%
42%
13%
78%
86%
2%
5%
7%
5%
38%
34%
24%
18%
51%
12%
14%
14%
39%
21%
67%
33%
45%
55%
C
2,514
-7
-0.28%
13%
74%
1%
8%
1,819
11%
81%
2%
5%
1,827
8%
7%
3%
1%
86%
1%
1,322
7%
6%
3%
1%
87%
1%
1,681
7%
7%
2%
1%
86%
1%
2,435
19%
49%
32%
13%
52%
83%
2%
9%
7%
1%
36%
28%
33%
22%
53%
11%
8%
16%
47%
17%
77%
23%
52%
48%
D
2,530
9 0.36%
13%
74%
1%
8%
1,925
9%
83%
1%
7%
1,638
7%
6%
2%
1%
89%
1%
1,161
6%
5%
2%
1%
90%
1%
1,477
8%
8%
2%
1%
88%
1%
2,461
17%
41%
43%
12%
70%
88%
2%
2%
7%
3%
37%
34%
25%
16%
57%
11%
13%
17%
34%
25%
74%
26%
46%
54%
E
2,558
37 1.47%
24%
58%
3%
10%
2,154
26%
65%
1%
6%
1,526
12%
10%
4%
1%
83%
0%
1,018
8%
7%
3%
1%
87%
0%
1,380
10%
9%
3%
1%
85%
1%
2,849
19%
52%
28%
13%
80%
71%
16%
2%
11%
3%
45%
24%
22%
26%
53%
5%
13%
17%
48%
16%
55%
45%
60%
40%
F
2,480
-41
-1.63%
12%
69%
2%
13%
1,722
8%
79%
1%
12%
1,785
11%
10%
5%
1%
83%
0%
1,187
11%
10%
4%
1%
84%
0%
1,576
9%
9%
5%
1%
84%
0%
2,310
25%
44%
31%
15%
81%
81%
5%
2%
12%
5%
40%
27%
27%
25%
51%
7%
13%
10%
51%
19%
77%
23%
31%
69%
Total
15,125
78 3.09%
14%
71%
2%
9%
11,809
11%
80%
2%
7%
10,509
9%
8%
3%
1%
83%
3%
7,310
7%
7%
3%
1%
85%
3%
9,615
8%
7%
3%
1%
84%
1%
15,105
18%
47%
35%
13%
68%
83%
5%
4%
8%
3%
38%
29%
28%
19%
54%
9%
12%
15%
44%
20%
68%
32%
51%
49%
01/23/2025 15:45 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
PGCC 3-5-25

D
C
F
E
B
A
Pacific Grove
Golf Links
Asilomar State
Beach
Lovers Point
Park
George
Washington Park Hopkins Marine
Station Stanford
el Carmelo Cmtry
Shoreline Park
Berwick Park
Arnett Park
Espalade Park
Caledonia Park
Chase Park
Jewell Park
The Inn and
Links at Spanish
Bay
Higgins Park
Monterey Bay
Pacific Ocean
Point Pinos
Lighthouse
Forest Ave
Sunset Dr
Holman Hwy
Cedar St
Asilomar Ave
Lighthouse Ave
Junipero Ave
Pine Ave
1st
St
Jewell Ave
Fountain
Ave
National Demographics Corporation, January 23, 2025
Pacific Grove 2025 Districting
©2021 CALIPER
PGCC 3-5-25

112
District A
Total Pop 2,548
Deviation from ideal 27
% Deviation 1.07%
% Hisp 13.6%
% NH White 72%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 8%
Total 1,940
% Hisp 3%
% NH White 87%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 6%
Total 1,791
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 7%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 14%
Total 1,249
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 14%
Total 1,642
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 0%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,322
age0-19 12%
age20-60 39%
age60plus 48%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 74%
english 85%
spanish 2%
asian-lang 5%
other lang 8%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 5%
hs-grad 38%
bachelor 36%
graduatedegree 23%
Child in Household child-under18 12%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 51%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 17%
income 50-75k 15%
income 75-200k 35%
income 200k-plus 22%
single family 65%
multi-family 35%
rented 51%
owned 49%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.

B
2,613
92 3.65%
11%
75%
1%
9%
1,844
10%
80%
3%
6%
1,897
7%
6%
3%
1%
87%
2%
1,354
6%
5%
3%
1%
88%
2%
1,756
6%
6%
2%
1%
88%
2%
2,312
19%
44%
37%
14%
66%
89%
2%
5%
4%
3%
36%
31%
30%
22%
52%
11%
8%
17%
44%
20%
76%
24%
46%
54%
C
2,384
-137
-5.43%
12%
75%
2%
6%
2,089
4%
87%
2%
6%
1,627
9%
8%
2%
2%
84%
3%
1,146
7%
6%
2%
2%
87%
3%
1,539
6%
6%
2%
2%
86%
2%
2,586
12%
49%
38%
12%
52%
89%
5%
2%
4%
2%
35%
28%
34%
12%
60%
10%
12%
17%
41%
20%
63%
37%
63%
37%
D
2,542
21 0.83%
13%
74%
1%
8%
2,059
11%
82%
1%
6%
1,883
9%
8%
3%
1%
85%
1%
1,356
7%
6%
2%
1%
87%
1%
1,722
8%
8%
2%
1%
86%
1%
2,726
19%
50%
30%
11%
55%
84%
2%
6%
8%
1%
37%
27%
33%
22%
58%
11%
9%
16%
44%
20%
75%
25%
50%
50%
E
2,522
1 0.04%
22%
60%
3%
12%
2,066
22%
69%
1%
8%
1,549
11%
10%
4%
1%
84%
0%
1,037
8%
7%
3%
1%
87%
0%
1,377
9%
9%
4%
1%
84%
1%
2,718
19%
46%
35%
13%
79%
74%
13%
2%
11%
3%
43%
28%
23%
24%
47%
6%
13%
14%
51%
17%
58%
42%
54%
46%
F
2,516
-5
-0.20%
14%
66%
2%
11%
1,810
13%
75%
2%
10%
1,762
11%
10%
5%
1%
83%
0%
1,168
11%
10%
4%
1%
84%
0%
1,579
9%
9%
4%
1%
85%
0%
2,440
25%
51%
24%
15%
81%
76%
8%
2%
13%
5%
43%
23%
26%
27%
58%
6%
13%
14%
48%
18%
75%
25%
38%
62%
Total
15,125
229

9.08%
14%
71%
2%
9%
11,809
11%
80%
2%
7%
10,509
9%
8%
3%
1%
83%
3%
7,310
7%
7%
3%
1%
85%
3%
9,615
8%
7%
3%
1%
84%
1%
15,105
18%
47%
35%
13%
68%
83%
5%
4%
8%
3%
38%
29%
28%
19%
54%
9%
12%
15%
44%
20%
68%
32%
51%
49%
01/23/2025 15:46 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
PGCC 3-5-25

C
E
D
F
B
A
Pacific Grove
Golf Links
Asilomar State
Beach
Lovers Point
Park
George
Washington Park Hopkins Marine
Station Stanford
el Carmelo Cmtry
Shoreline Park
Berwick Park
Arnett Park
Espalade Park
Caledonia Park
Tennis Cts
Chase Park
Jewell Park
The Inn and
Links at Spanish
Bay
Higgins Park
Monterey Bay
Pacific Ocean
Point Pinos
Lighthouse
Forest Ave
Sunset Dr
Holman Hwy
Cedar St
Sinex Ave
Asilomar Ave
Lighthouse Ave
Junipero Ave
Pine Ave
1st
St
Jewell Ave
Fountain
Ave
National Demographics Corporation, January 23, 2025
Pacific Grove 2025 Districting
©2021 CALIPER
PGCC 3-5-25

113
District A
Total Pop 2,517
Deviation from ideal -4
% Deviation -0.16%
% Hisp 10.5%
% NH White 78%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 6%
Total 2,018
% Hisp 4%
% NH White 88%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 5%
Total 1,770
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 87%
% NH Black 3%
Total 1,244
% Latino est. 6%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 88%
% NH Black 3%
Total 1,675
% Latino est. 6%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 88%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,465
age0-19 12%
age20-60 40%
age60plus 48%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 63%
english 86%
spanish 4%
asian-lang 3%
other lang 7%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 4%
hs-grad 36%
bachelor 34%
graduatedegree 25%
Child in Household child-under18 10%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 54%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 15%
income 50-75k 15%
income 75-200k 37%
income 200k-plus 23%
single family 67%
multi-family 33%
rented 54%
owned 46%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.

B
2,519
-2
-0.08%
14%
72%
1%
8%
1,900
7%
84%
1%
7%
1,887
7%
6%
2%
1%
78%
12%
1,333
6%
6%
2%
1%
79%
12%
1,714
7%
7%
1%
1%
79%
0%
2,344
16%
43%
40%
12%
71%
87%
1%
3%
8%
2%
39%
33%
25%
17%
56%
11%
15%
16%
36%
22%
69%
31%
47%
53%
C
2,521

0.00%
14%
72%
2%
7%
2,202
7%
85%
1%
7%
1,772
10%
9%
3%
2%
82%
2%
1,250
8%
7%
2%
2%
85%
2%
1,640
8%
8%
2%
2%
83%
2%
2,816
16%
53%
31%
11%
52%
86%
4%
5%
6%
1%
34%
26%
37%
17%
59%
10%
9%
17%
44%
19%
65%
35%
61%
39%
D
2,530
9 0.36%
12%
75%
1%
9%
1,813
11%
79%
3%
6%
1,769
7%
6%
3%
1%
87%
2%
1,277
6%
5%
3%
1%
88%
2%
1,630
6%
6%
2%
1%
88%
2%
2,322
20%
46%
33%
14%
60%
87%
2%
7%
5%
2%
36%
29%
32%
24%
52%
12%
6%
16%
48%
18%
78%
22%
47%
53%
E
2,518
-3
-0.12%
24%
59%
3%
10%
2,108
25%
66%
1%
6%
1,530
11%
10%
4%
1%
84%
0%
1,024
8%
7%
3%
1%
87%
0%
1,399
10%
9%
3%
1%
85%
1%
2,788
19%
52%
29%
13%
80%
71%
15%
2%
11%
3%
45%
24%
23%
26%
53%
6%
13%
17%
49%
16%
55%
45%
59%
41%
F
2,520
-1
-0.04%
12%
68%
2%
13%
1,768
9%
78%
1%
12%
1,781
11%
10%
5%
1%
83%
0%
1,181
11%
10%
4%
1%
84%
0%
1,557
9%
9%
5%
1%
85%
0%
2,370
25%
45%
31%
15%
81%
80%
6%
2%
12%
5%
41%
27%
27%
25%
52%
6%
13%
11%
51%
19%
75%
25%
33%
67%
Total
15,125
13 0.52%
14%
71%
2%
9%
11,809
11%
80%
2%
7%
10,509
9%
8%
3%
1%
83%
3%
7,310
7%
7%
3%
1%
85%
3%
9,615
8%
7%
3%
1%
84%
1%
15,105
18%
47%
35%
13%
68%
83%
5%
4%
8%
3%
38%
29%
28%
19%
54%
9%
12%
15%
44%
20%
68%
32%
51%
49%
01/23/2025 15:47 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
PGCC 3-5-25

C
F
D
E
B
A
Pacific Grove
Golf Links
Asilomar State
Beach
Lovers Point
Park
George
Washington Park Hopkins Marine
Station Stanford
el Carmelo Cmtry
Shoreline Park
Berwick Park
Arnett Park
Espalade Park
Caledonia Park
Tennis Cts
Chase Park
Jewell Park
The Inn and
Links at Spanish
Bay
Higgins Park
Monterey Bay
Pacific Ocean
Point Pinos
Lighthouse
Forest Ave
Sunset Dr
Holman Hwy
Cedar St
Sinex Ave
Asilomar Ave
Lighthouse Ave
Junipero Ave
Pine Ave
1st
St
Jewell Ave
Fountain
Ave
National Demographics Corporation, January 23, 2025
Pacific Grove 2025 Districting
©2021 CALIPER
PGCC 3-5-25

114
District A
Total Pop 2,517
Deviation from ideal -4
% Deviation -0.16%
% Hisp 10.5%
% NH White 78%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 6%
Total 2,018
% Hisp 4%
% NH White 88%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 5%
Total 1,770
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 87%
% NH Black 3%
Total 1,244
% Latino est. 6%
% Spanish-Surnamed 5%
% Asian-Surnamed 1%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 88%
% NH Black 3%
Total 1,675
% Latino est. 6%
% Spanish-Surnamed 6%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 88%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,465
age0-19 12%
age20-60 40%
age60plus 48%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 63%
english 86%
spanish 4%
asian-lang 3%
other lang 7%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 4%
hs-grad 36%
bachelor 34%
graduatedegree 25%
Child in Household child-under18 10%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 54%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 15%
income 50-75k 15%
income 75-200k 37%
income 200k-plus 23%
single family 67%
multi-family 33%
rented 54%
owned 46%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.

B
2,519
-2
-0.08%
14%
72%
1%
8%
1,900
7%
84%
1%
7%
1,887
7%
6%
2%
1%
78%
12%
1,333
6%
6%
2%
1%
79%
12%
1,714
7%
7%
1%
1%
79%
0%
2,344
16%
43%
40%
12%
71%
87%
1%
3%
8%
2%
39%
33%
25%
17%
56%
11%
15%
16%
36%
22%
69%
31%
47%
53%
C
2,521

0.00%
14%
72%
2%
7%
2,202
7%
85%
1%
7%
1,772
10%
9%
3%
2%
82%
2%
1,250
8%
7%
2%
2%
85%
2%
1,640
8%
8%
2%
2%
83%
2%
2,816
16%
53%
31%
11%
52%
86%
4%
5%
6%
1%
34%
26%
37%
17%
59%
10%
9%
17%
44%
19%
65%
35%
61%
39%
D
2,530
9 0.36%
12%
75%
1%
9%
1,813
11%
79%
3%
6%
1,769
7%
6%
3%
1%
87%
2%
1,277
6%
5%
3%
1%
88%
2%
1,630
6%
6%
2%
1%
88%
2%
2,322
20%
46%
33%
14%
60%
87%
2%
7%
5%
2%
36%
29%
32%
24%
52%
12%
6%
16%
48%
18%
78%
22%
47%
53%
E
2,516
-5
-0.20%
24%
59%
3%
11%
2,053
24%
67%
1%
8%
1,481
11%
10%
4%
1%
84%
0%
992
8%
7%
3%
1%
87%
0%
1,322
10%
9%
4%
1%
84%
1%
2,728
19%
48%
33%
13%
80%
73%
13%
2%
11%
3%
43%
27%
23%
25%
49%
6%
13%
15%
50%
17%
57%
43%
55%
45%
F
2,522
1 0.04%
12%
68%
2%
11%
1,823
11%
77%
2%
10%
1,830
11%
10%
5%
1%
83%
0%
1,212
11%
10%
4%
1%
84%
0%
1,634
9%
9%
4%
1%
85%
0%
2,430
25%
49%
26%
15%
81%
77%
8%
2%
13%
5%
43%
24%
26%
26%
56%
6%
13%
13%
49%
18%
74%
26%
37%
63%
Total
15,125
14 0.56%
14%
71%
2%
9%
11,809
11%
80%
2%
7%
10,509
9%
8%
3%
1%
83%
3%
7,310
7%
7%
3%
1%
85%
3%
9,615
8%
7%
3%
1%
84%
1%
15,105
18%
47%
35%
13%
68%
83%
5%
4%
8%
3%
38%
29%
28%
19%
54%
9%
12%
15%
44%
20%
68%
32%
51%
49%
01/23/2025 15:48 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
PGCC 3-5-25

D
C
F
E
A
B
Pacific Grove
Golf Links
Asilomar State
Beach
Lovers Point
Park
George
Washington Park Hopkins Marine
Station Stanford
el Carmelo Cmtry
Berwick Park
Shoreline Park
Arnett Park
Espalade Park
Caledonia Park
Tennis Cts
Greenwood Park
Chase Park
Jewell Park
The Inn and
Links at Spanish
Bay
Higgins Park
Monterey Bay
Pacific Ocean
Point Pinos
Lighthouse
Forest Ave
Sunset Dr
Holman Hwy
Cedar St
Sinex Ave
Asilomar Ave
Lighthouse Ave
Junipero Ave
Pine Ave
1st
St
Jewell Ave
Fountain
Ave
National Demographics Corporation, January 23, 2025
Pacific Grove 2025 Districting
©2021 CALIPER
PGCC 3-5-25

115
District A
Total Pop 2,541
Deviation from ideal 20
% Deviation 0.79%
% Hisp 13.5%
% NH White 73%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 7%
Total 2,278
% Hisp 5%
% NH White 86%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 6%
Total 1,791
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 9%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 83%
% NH Black 2%
Total 1,259
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 7%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 86%
% NH Black 2%
Total 1,694
% Latino est. 7%
% Spanish-Surnamed 7%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 84%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,820
age0-19 14%
age20-60 53%
age60plus 33%
immigrants 12%
naturalized 50%
english 87%
spanish 4%
asian-lang 4%
other lang 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 2%
hs-grad 34%
bachelor 26%
graduatedegree 37%
Child in Household child-under18 14%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 60%
income 0-25k 10%
income 25-50k 10%
income 50-75k 16%
income 75-200k 44%
income 200k-plus 20%
single family 65%
multi-family 35%
rented 62%
owned 38%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.

B
2,584
63 2.50%
13%
72%
2%
8%
1,952
2%
88%
3%
6%
1,927
7%
7%
2%
1%
77%
13%
1,348
7%
6%
2%
1%
78%
13%
1,779
6%
6%
2%
1%
79%
1%
2,283
11%
41%
48%
14%
74%
84%
2%
5%
8%
5%
38%
35%
24%
12%
50%
11%
17%
14%
37%
22%
64%
36%
51%
49%
C
2,499
-22
-0.87%
24%
58%
3%
10%
2,019
27%
64%
1%
6%
1,512
11%
10%
3%
1%
84%
1%
1,026
8%
7%
3%
1%
87%
1%
1,354
12%
11%
2%
1%
83%
1%
2,773
20%
54%
26%
13%
74%
72%
13%
4%
11%
2%
44%
24%
25%
26%
56%
7%
12%
17%
47%
16%
61%
39%
58%
42%
D
2,472
-49
-1.94%
13%
75%
1%
7%
1,929
11%
82%
1%
6%
1,679
7%
6%
2%
1%
88%
2%
1,207
6%
5%
2%
1%
89%
2%
1,544
7%
7%
2%
1%
88%
2%
2,570
18%
44%
38%
12%
61%
87%
3%
3%
8%
2%
38%
32%
27%
18%
59%
11%
12%
18%
36%
23%
74%
26%
49%
51%
E
2,520
-1
-0.04%
11%
76%
1%
9%
1,835
9%
81%
2%
7%
1,814
8%
7%
3%
1%
86%
2%
1,287
6%
6%
3%
1%
88%
2%
1,671
5%
5%
3%
1%
89%
2%
2,267
20%
40%
40%
14%
68%
88%
3%
4%
4%
3%
36%
31%
29%
24%
46%
10%
7%
15%
49%
19%
75%
25%
45%
55%
F
2,509
-12
-0.48%
12%
68%
2%
13%
1,795
10%
78%
1%
11%
1,786
11%
10%
5%
1%
83%
0%
1,184
11%
10%
4%
1%
84%
0%
1,573
9%
9%
4%
1%
85%
0%
2,392
25%
47%
29%
15%
81%
78%
7%
2%
13%
5%
42%
26%
26%
26%
54%
6%
13%
12%
50%
19%
74%
26%
36%
64%
Total
15,125
112