CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA
Wednesday, September 17, 2025, 5:00 P.M.
Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA Under the Brown Act, public comment for matters on the agenda must relate to that agenda item and public comments for matters not on the agenda must relate to the subject matter jurisdiction of this legislative body. This is a warning that if a member of the public attending this meeting remotely or in-person violates the Brown Act by failing to comply with these requirements of the Brown Act, then the Mayor or Chair may request that speaker be muted. If a member of the public attending this meeting in-person engages in disruptive behavior that disturbs the orderly conduct of the meeting, they may be removed from the meeting after a warning, pursuant to Council Policy 000-17.
PACIFIC GROVE MEETINGS ARE CONDUCTED IN PERSON AT CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER AND VIRTUALLY.
PLEASE NOTE THE MEETING WILL PROCEED AS NORMAL EVEN IF THERE ARE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES ACCESSING ZOOM.
THE CITY WILL DO ITS BEST TO RESOLVE ANY TECHNICAL ISSUES AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.
Join the Zoom Meeting to participate live at:
https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/Zoom_Closed
Please click here for directions to dial into the meeting audio.
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
SPECIAL MEETING
PUBLIC COMMENT ON SPECIAL MEETING MATTERS
Comments from the public will not receive Council action. Comments must deal with matters on the Special Meeting agenda and will be limited to three minutes.
A. Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Government Code § 54956.8) Property: Point Pinos Grill, 79 Asilomar Blvd, Pacific Grove Agency Negotiator(s): Matthew Mogensen, City Manager; Brian Pierik, City Attorney; Dan Gho, Public Works Director/Deputy City Manager; Nicholas Cina, Financial Management Analyst Negotiating Party(ies): Tamie Aceves
Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment of lease.
PGCC 9-17-25
ADJOURNMENT
PGCC 9-17-25
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Wednesday, September 17, 2025, 6:00 P.M.
Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA Appearing Remotely Via Zoom:
Councilmember Walkingstick
3450 Cahuenga Boulevard West
Los Angeles, CA 90068
The Council will not begin consideration of any item on this agenda later than 10:00 p.m. unless such consideration is approved. Any items on this agenda not considered this evening will be continued to a future meeting.
Copies of the agenda packet are available for review at the Pacific Grove Library, in the Finance Department, and electronically at www.cityofpacificgrove.org/agendas. The most effective method of communication with the City Council is by sending an email to [email protected]. In order to allow the City Council adequate time to review communication related to an agenda item, it is recommended that the communication be sent no later than 9:00 AM on the day prior to the City Council meeting. Public comments received through this email address by noon on the day of the meeting will be posted with the corresponding agenda item.
Under the Brown Act, public comment for matters on the agenda must relate to that agenda item and public comments for matters not on the agenda must relate to the subject matter jurisdiction of this legislative body. This is a warning that if a member of the public attending this meeting remotely or in-person violates the Brown Act by failing to comply with these requirements of the Brown Act, then the Mayor or Chair may request that speaker be muted. If a member of the public attending this meeting in-person engages in disruptive behavior that disturbs the orderly conduct of the meeting, they may be removed from the meeting after a warning, pursuant to Council Policy 000-17.
PACIFIC GROVE COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE CONDUCTED IN PERSON AT CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER AND VIRTUALLY.
PLEASE NOTE THE MEETING WILL PROCEED AS NORMAL EVEN IF THERE ARE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES ACCESSING ZOOM.
THE CITY WILL DO ITS BEST TO RESOLVE ANY TECHNICAL ISSUES AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.
THE PUBLIC MAY ALSO VIEW THE MEETING ON PENINSULA CHANNEL 25.
JOIN THE ZOOM WEBINAR TO PARTICIPATE LIVE AT:
https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/Zoom_CC
Please click here for directions to dial into the meeting audio.
PGCC 9-17-25
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Councilmember Poduri
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
2. PRESENTATIONS
3. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (City-Related Items Only) A. Report on Closed Session by City Attorney
B. Other
4. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
General Public Comment must deal with matters subject to the jurisdiction of the City and the Council that are not on the Regular Agenda. This is the appropriate place to comment as to items on the Consent Agenda, only if you do not wish to have the item pulled for individual consideration by the Council. Comments from the public will be limited to three minutes and will not receive Council action. Comments regarding items on the Regular Agenda shall be heard prior to Council’s consideration of such items at the time such items are called.
Whenever possible, written correspondence should be submitted to the Council in advance of the meeting, to provide adequate time for its consideration.
A. Written General Public Comment
CONSENT AGENDA
The Consent Agenda deals with routine and non-controversial matters, and may include action on resolutions, ordinances, or other public hearings for which testimony is not anticipated. The vote on the Consent Agenda shall apply to each item that has not been removed. Any member of Council, staff, or the public may remove an item from the Consent Agenda for individual consideration. When items are pulled for discussion, they will be automatically placed at the end of their respective section within the Regular Agenda. One motion shall be made to adopt all non-removed items on the Consent Agenda.
5. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 12. Unfinished and Ongoing Business A. Minutes of the September 3, 2025 City Council Special and Regular Meetings PG 10 Reference: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk
Recommended Action: Approve the minutes.
PGCC 9-17-25
Recommended Action: Approve the minutes.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
6. RESOLUTIONS
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 12. Unfinished and Ongoing Business or 13. New Business
7. ORDINANCES
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 11. Public Hearings A. Second Reading of Ordinance Repealing Ordinance No. 25-007 Increasing the PG 17 Compensation of the Mayor and City Councilmembers
Reference: Brian Pierik, City Attorney
Recommended Action: Hold second reading and adopt an Ordinance Repealing Ordinance No. 25-007 Increasing the Compensation of the Mayor and City Councilmembers.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Second Read of an Ordinance Regarding Central, Grand & Fountain Avenue Street PG 21 Improvements Project
Reference: Daniel Gho, Public Works Director/Deputy City Manager Recommended Action: Hold second reading of the Proposed Ordinance Amending the Operating and Capital Projects Budget for FY25/26
CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class I, Existing Facilities
8. REPORTS – INFORMATION ONLY
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 12. Unfinished and Ongoing Business or 13. New Business A. Check Register and Core Fund Summary - August 2025 PG 26 Reference: Nicholas Cina, Finance Management Analyst
Recommended Action:
1. Receive the Check Register and Core Fund Summary.
2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
CEQA:
B. Fourth Quarter FY 24/25 Capital Project Report & Update PG 46 Reference: Kimberly Shehorn, Accountant
Recommended Action:
1. Receive the report.
2. Alternatively, discuss and take action related to this item.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines PGCC 9-17-25
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
C. Fourth Quarter Treasurer’s Quarterly Report PG 56
Reference: Kim Shehorn, Accountant
Recommended Action:
1. Receive the report.
2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
D. Fourth Quarter 24-25 Interim Financial Statements PG 75 Reference: Fred Marsh, Administrative Services Director Recommended Action:
1. Receive the report.
2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
E. Report on the August 25, 2025 City/PGUSD Joint Subcommittee Meeting PG 88 Reference: Matthew Mogensen, City Manager
Recommended Action: Receive and File Report on the August 25, 2025 City/PGUSD Joint Subcommittee Meeting
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
F. Monterey Salinas Transit Meeting Minutes for August 11, 2025 PG 91 Reference: Joe Amelio, Mayor Pro Tem
Recommended Action: Receive minutes.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
9. REPORTS – REQUIRING ACTION
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 12. Unfinished and Ongoing Business or 13. New Business A. Waste Hauler Franchise Agreement Matters Memorandum of Understanding with ReGen Monterey and Participating Member Agencies PG 97
Reference: George Fuerst, Environmental Program Manager Recommended Action:
Approve the Memorandum of Understanding with ReGen Monterey and participating member agencies regarding assistance with franchise agreement matters; and
1. 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the MOU on behalf of the City of Pacific Grove.
PGCC 9-17-25
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Designation of Official City Newspapers PG 116
Reference: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk
Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to award the designation of 2025-2026 Official Newspaper to the Monterey Herald, the Monterey County Weekly, and the Carmel Pine Cone.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
10. MEETING MINUTES OF COMMISSIONS, BOARDS, AND COMMITTEES Items pulled from this section will be placed under 13. New Business A. Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes: August 12, 2025. PG 124 Reference: Anna Bornstein, Associate Planner
Recommended Action: Receive the minutes.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
REGULAR AGENDA
11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
For public hearings involving a quasi-judicial determination by the Council, the proponent of an item may be given 10 minutes to speak and others in support of the proponent’s position may be given three minutes each. A designated spokesperson for opposition to the item may be given 10 minutes to speak and all others in opposition may be given three minutes each. Very brief rebuttal and surrebuttal may be allowed in the sole discretion of the Council. In public hearings not involving a quasi-judicial determination by the Council, all persons may be given three minutes to speak on the matter.
A. Proposed Ordinance Regarding Code Enforcement Adding Chapter 1.17, Amending Chapter
1.18, Repealing and Replacing Chapter 1.19, Repealing and Reserving Chapter 3.30, Amending Chapter 6.09, Amending Chapter 7.40, and Amending Chapter 9.17 PG 128 Reference: Brian Pierik, City Attorney
Recommended Action:
Discuss Proposed Ordinance Regarding Code Enforcement Adding Chapter 1.17, Amending Chapter 1.18, Repealing and Replacing Chapter 1.19, Repealing and Reserving Chapter 3.30, Amending Chapter 6.09, Amending Chapter 7.40, and Amending Chapter 9.17. If the Council wishes to proceed with the Proposed Ordinance, then the following actions are recommended.
1. Request the City Attorney to read the title of the Ordinance Regarding Code Enforcement By Adding Chapter 1.17, and Amending Chapter 1.18, and Repealing and Replacing Chapter 1.19, Repealing and Reserving Chapter 3.30, Amending Chapter
6.09, Amending Chapter 7.40, and Amending Chapter 9.17.
2. PGCC 9-17-25
6.09, Amending Chapter 7.40, and Amending Chapter 9.17.
3. Motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance.
Introduce and hold the first reading of an Ordinance Regarding Code Enforcement Adding Chapter 1.17, and Amending Chapter 1.18, Repealing and Replacing Chapter
1.19, Repealing and Reserving Chapter 3.30, Amending Chapter 6.09, Amending Chapter 7.40, and Amending Chapter 9.17.
4. Direct that publication of the Ordinance will be satisfied by publication of a summary approved by the City Attorney.
5. CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
12. UNFINISHED AND ONGOING BUSINESS
A. Cedar, Sunset & Congress Intersection Improvements Project PG 192 Reference: Daniel Gho, Public Works Director/Deputy City Manager Recommended Action:
Authorize staff to begin working with the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) to amend the funding agreement for the Cedar, Sunset and Congress Intersection Project, requesting a funding increase of $137,961, to continue with the Design Engineering Evaluation Report, for a Round-a-Bout at the intersection.
1. Bring back the TAMC funding agreement and GHD amendment at a future Council meeting for consideration.
2. 3. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
13. NEW BUSINESS
A. Responsibilities and Authority of the Historic Resources Committee PG 246 Reference: Cynthia Garfield, Councilmember
Recommended Action: Direct staff to bring back to council a conceptual model that addresses two areas of concern discussed below.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
14. FULL PRESENTATIONS
A. Hopkins Marine Station Update PG 248
Reference: Bill Sherrod, Associate Director Stanford University | Oceans Department | Hopkins Marine Station
Recommended Action: Receive presentation.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
PGCC 9-17-25
15. CLOSED SESSION
ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE OF ADA COMPLIANCE: Pursuant to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (Codified At 42 United States Code Section 12101 and 28 Code of Federal Regulations Part 35), and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the City of Pacific Grove does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, disability, age or sexual orientation in the provision of any services, programs, or activities. The City of Pacific Grove does not discriminate against persons with disabilities. City Hall is an accessible facility. A limited number of assisted listening devices will be available at this meeting. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting or provide the requested agenda format.
PGCC 9-17-25
Agenda No. 5 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk/DEI Coordinator
MEETING DATE: September 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Minutes of the September 3, 2025 City Council Special and Regular Meetings CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the minutes.
Attachments
Draft Minutes
PGCC 9-17-25
1 DRAFT MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
Wednesday, September 3, 2025, 5:00 P.M.
Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA Join the Zoom Meeting to participate live at:
https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/Zoom_Closed
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Pro Tem Amelio called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Present in Chamber: Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Councilmembers Garfield, McDonnell, Rau and Walkingstick. Councilmember Poduri arrived at the meeting at 5:05 p.m. Absent: Mayor Smith.
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
Upon motion by Councilmember Rau and seconded by Councilmember McDonnell, Council voted 5-0-2, Mayor Smith and Councilmember Poduri absent, to approve the Special Meeting Agenda.
SPECIAL MEETING
PUBLIC COMMENT ON SPECIAL MEETING MATTERS
No public comment received.
A. Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Government Code § 54956.8) Property: 77 Asilomar, Pacific Grove (Pacific Grove Golf Links) Agency Negotiator(s): Matthew Mogensen, City Manager; Brian Pierik, City Attorney; Nicholas Cina, Finance Management Analyst
Negotiating Party(ies): Michael Sharp, PGA, President/CEO, CourseCo Inc.
Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment
B. Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Government Code § 54956.8) Property: Point Pinos Grill, 79 Asilomar Blvd, Pacific Grove Agency Negotiator(s): Matthew Mogensen, City Manager; Brian Pierik, City Attorney; Nicholas Cina, Finance Management Analyst
Negotiating Party(ies): Tamie Aceves
Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment.
PGCC 9-17-25
2 DRAFT MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, September 3, 2025, 6:00 P.M.
Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA JOIN THE ZOOM WEBINAR TO PARTICIPATE LIVE AT:
https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/Zoom_CC
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Pro Tem Amelio called the meeting to order at 6:15 p.m. Present in Chamber: Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Councilmembers Garfield, McDonnell, Poduri, Rau and Walkingstick. Absent: Mayor Smith.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Pro Tem Amelio led the pledge of allegiance.
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Upon motion by Councilmember Rau and seconded by Councilmember Walkingstick, Council voted 6-0-1, Mayor Smith absent, to approve the Regular Meeting Agenda (as modified).
2. PRESENTATIONS
A. Mayor's Proclamation: Jacob's Heart
Action: Presented proclamation.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Mayor's Proclamation: Hispanic Heritage Month
Action: Presented proclamation.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
C. Mayor's Proclamation: National Voter Registration Day Action: Presented proclamation.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
3. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (City-Related Items Only) A. Report on Closed Session by City Attorney
Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Government Code § 54956.8) Property: 77 Asilomar, Pacific Grove (Pacific Grove Golf Links) Agency Negotiator(s): Matthew Mogensen, City Manager; Brian Pierik, City Attorney; Nicholas Cina, Finance Management Analyst
PGCC 9-17-25
3 Negotiating Party(ies): Michael Sharp, PGA, President/CEO, CourseCo Inc.
Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment
Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Government Code § 54956.8) Property: Point Pinos Grill, 79 Asilomar Blvd, Pacific Grove Agency Negotiator(s): Matthew Mogensen, City Manager; Brian Pierik, City Attorney; Nicholas Cina, Finance Management Analyst
Negotiating Party(ies): Tamie Aceves
Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment.
City Attorney Pierik reported no action was taken as to both items.
B. Council and staff made general announcements.
4. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
General public comment received from Susan Goldbeck, Jasmine Venegas, Sharon Miller, Inge Lorentzen Daumer, Anthony Ciani, Lisa Ciani, Jane Haines, and Carol Marquart.
A. Written General Public Comment
CONSENT AGENDA
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Poduri and seconded by Councilmember Walkingstick, Council voted 6-0-1, Mayor Smith absent, to approve the Consent Agenda.
Action: The motion to approve the consent agenda was withdrawn to see if the public needed to pull the item. Carol Marquart did not wish to pull an item but provided public comment.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Rau and seconded by Councilmember Poduri, Council voted 6-0-1, Mayor Smith absent, to approve the Consent Agenda.
5. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
A. Minutes of the August 20, 2025 City Council Special and Regular Meetings Action: Approved the minutes.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
6. RESOLUTIONS
7. ORDINANCES
8. REPORTS – INFORMATION ONLY
9. REPORTS – REQUIRING ACTION
10. MEETING MINUTES OF COMMISSIONS, BOARDS, AND COMMITTEES A. Architectural Review Board Minutes: April 8, 2025, May 13, 2025, June 10, 2025, July 8, 2025
Action: Received the minutes.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines PGCC 9-17-25
4 Section 15378
REGULAR AGENDA
11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Central, Grand & Fountain Avenue Street Improvements Project Public comment received from Susan Goldbeck, Inge Lorentzen Daumer, and Lisa Ciani.
Action: Councilmember McDonnell requested the City Attorney to read the title of the Proposed Ordinance.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember McDonnell and seconded by Councilmember Rau, Council voted 6-0-1, Mayor Smith absent to approve the remaining items:
2. Waive further reading of the ordinance;
3. Introduce and hold the first reading of the Proposed Ordinance Amending the Operating and Capital Projects Budget for FY25/26; and
4. Direct a summary of a proposed Ordinance to be published as approved by the City Attorney.
5. Accept payment by Kimpton Hotel Developers in an amount of $86,976.12, per condition #11 of the Architectural and Use Permit to be harnessed for the street improvements.
6. Authorize Agreement with Monterey Peninsula Engineering (MPE) for the Central, Grand and Fountain Avenue Street Improvement Project for an amount not to exceed $657,634 plus a 10% contingency.
CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class I, Existing Facilities
B. Resolution amending Resolution No. 25-020 for dates of circulation of Referendum Petition and First Reading of Ordinance Repealing Ordinance No. 25-007 Increasing the Compensation of the Mayor and City Councilmembers
No public comment received.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Poduri and seconded by Councilmember Rau, Council voted to Adopt Resolution No. 25-021 Amending Resolution No. 25-020 Accepting the Certification of Sufficiency of the Referendum Against Ordinance No. 25- 007 Increasing the Compensation of the Mayor and City Councilmembers.
Action: Councilmember Poduri requested the City Attorney to read the title of the Ordinance Repealing Ordinance No. 25-007 Increasing the Compensation of the Mayor and City Councilmembers.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Poduri and seconded by Council Rau, Council voted 6-0-1, Mayor Smith absent, to approve the remaining items:
3. Waive further reading of the Ordinance;
4. Introduce and hold the first reading of an Ordinance Repealing Ordinance No. 25- 007 Increasing the Compensation of the Mayor and City Councilmembers.
5. Direct that publication of the Ordinance will be satisfied by publication of a summary PGCC 9-17-25
5 approved by the City Attorney.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
12. UNFINISHED AND ONGOING BUSINESS
A. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework and Policy This item was continued from the Council's August 20, 2025 Regular Meeting Agenda.
Public comment received from Lisa Ciani and Inge Lorentzen Daumer.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Rau and seconded by Councilmember Walkingstick, Council voted 6-0-1, Mayor Smith absent, to direct the City Manager to initiate the development of a comprehensive City-wide Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework and Policy, for Council review and adoption.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. "Dancing Monarchs" Art Donation Location Selection
Public comment received from Susan Goldbeck, Sally Moore, Jan Stewart, Inge Lorentzen Daumer, Lisa Ciani, and Sharon Miller.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Rau and seconded by Councilmember Walkingstick, Council voted 6-0-1, Mayor Smith absent, to direct staff to return to Council with information regarding the site selection for the sculpture at Lover’s Point and the Oceanview paved circle.
CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15304, Class 4, Minor Alterations to Land
13. NEW BUSINESS
A. League of California Cities (LoCC) Annual Conference Voting Delegate and Alternate(s) No public comment received.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Rau and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, Council discussed, designated, and adopted by Resolution No. 25-022 voting delegate Mayor Smith and alternates Mayor Pro Tem Amelio and Councilmember Poduri to represent the City on policy matters at the League of California Cities (LoCC) Annual Conference on October 8-10 in Long Beach, California.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
14. FULL PRESENTATIONS
A. 3CE Presentation by Community Relations Manager Sophia Schwirzke Public comment received from Lisa Ciani.
Action: Council received the presentation.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
PGCC 9-17-25
6 15. CLOSED SESSION
ADJOURNMENT
Council adjourned the regular meeting at 9:11 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Sandra Kandell
City Clerk
Approved by Mayor: _______________________________Date________________ Attest by City Manager: ____________________________Date________________ PGCC 9-17-25
Agenda No. 7 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian Pierik, City Attorney
MEETING DATE: September 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Second Reading of Ordinance Repealing Ordinance No. 25-007 Increasing the Compensation of the Mayor and City Councilmembers
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Hold second reading and adopt an Ordinance Repealing Ordinance No. 25-007 Increasing the Compensation of the Mayor and City Councilmembers.
DISCUSSION
On September 3, 2025, the City Council held a first reading and introduced an Ordinance to repeal Ordinance No. 25-007 Increasing the Salary of the Mayor and City Councilmembers.
This Agenda item presents to the City Council for second reading an Ordinance to repeal Ordinance No. 25-007 (Attachment 1).
There were no substantive changes between the first and second readings of this ordinance.
The City Clerk caused a summary of ordinance to be published on September 11, 2025.
OPTIONS
Take other action related to the subject of this Agenda item.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact for this agenda item.
FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.
Attachments
Proposed Ordinance
PGCC 9-17-25
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 25-007 INCREASING THE COMPENSATION OF THE
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FACTS
1. On May 7, 2025, the Council considered and discussed a potential ordinance increasing the compensation of the Mayor and City Councilmembers and providing medical benefits as available to City Management Employees. The issue of medical benefits was tabled and the Council introduced and held first reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Pacific Grove Increasing the Compensation of the Mayor and City Councilmembers.
2. On May 21, 2025, the Council held second reading and adopted an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Pacific Grove Increasing the Compensation of the Mayor and City Councilmembers.
3. Absent the Referendum, Ordinance No. 25-007 would have become effective 30 days after adoption (Friday, June 20, 2025).
4. Article 16 of the City Charter states, “The right of initiative and referendum is hereby preserved to the citizens of the City to be exercised in accordance with the procedures prescribed by the Constitution and General Laws of this State.”
5. For a Referendum to appear on a ballot, a petition must be submitted within 30 days of Proponent's receipt of the City Attorney's approved Summary of Referendum and be signed by Pacific Grove voters equaling 10% or more of the voter registration last officially reported to the Secretary of State. On February 10, 2025, the County report of City voter registration to the State was 10,601. Ten percent of 10,601 is 1060.
6. On May 23, 2025, the Referendum proponent presented to the City Clerk’s Office a Request for an Approved Summary of Referendum Against Ordinance 25-007.
7. On June 5, 2025, City Attorney transmitted an approved Summary of Referendum to the Proponent; commencing the period to circulate petitions on June 6, 2025 and concluding on July 7, 2025.
8. On July 1, 2025, a Referendum petition was submitted to the City Clerk. A prima facie count was conducted by the City Clerk’s office and it was established that there were 1773 signatures received. At the point the Referendum was accepted, Ordinance No. 25-007 was suspended pursuant to Elections Code Section 9237.
9. On July 2, 2025, the Referendum petition was delivered to the Monterey County Elections Department and Registrar of Voters for review of the petition signatures.
10. The City’s instructions to the County requested examination of signatures and 2 certification be accomplished by full check pursuant to Elections Code Section 9114.
PGCC 9-17-25
11. On August 6, 2025, the Monterey County Registrar of Voters provided the City with its Certificate of Signature Verification resolving that the number of valid signatures on said petition exceeds 10% of the registered voters in the City of Pacific Grove.
12. On August 20, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 25-020 declaring the certification of sufficiency of the Referendum against Ordinance 25-007 increasing the compensation of the Mayor and City Councilmembers.
13. On August 20, 2025, the City Council approved a Motion to direct staff to return to the Council on September 3, 2025 with an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 25-007 and to return to the Council at a future meeting for discussion of a possible ballot measure to be presented in 2026 for a public vote on an ordinance increasing the salary of the Mayor and City Councilmembers.
14. On September 3, 2025, the Council adopted Resolution No. xxx Amending Resolution No. 25-020 to correct the date of circulation of the Referendum petition to June 6, 2025 to July 7, 2025.
15. This action does not constitute a “Project” under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The foregoing Facts are adopted as findings of the City Council as though set forth in fully within the body of this Ordinance.
SECTION 2. Ordinance No. 25-007 Increasing the Compensation of Mayor and City Councilmembers is hereby repealed.
SECTION 3. Severability. If any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or any part thereof, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, or any part thereof, or its application to other persons or circumstances. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted each provision, section, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, paragraphs, subparagraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 4. In accord with Article 15 of the City Charter, this ordinance shall become effective on the thirtieth (30th) day following its passage and adoption.
PGCC 9-17-25
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE `COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE this ______ day of September, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
_______________________________
Nick Smith, Mayor
ATTEST:
DATED:_______________________
_______________________________
SANDRA KANDELL, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
BRIAN A. PIERIK, City Attorney
PGCC 9-17-25
Agenda No. 7 B
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Daniel Gho, Public Works Director/Deputy City Manager MEETING DATE: September 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Second Read of an Ordinance Regarding Central, Grand & Fountain Avenue Street Improvements Project
CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class I, Existing Facilities
RECOMMENDATION
Hold second reading of the Proposed Ordinance Amending the Operating and Capital Projects Budget for FY25/26
DISCUSSION
No substantive changes were made between the first and second readings of this ordinance. The City Clerk caused a summary of the ordinance to be published on September 11, 2025.
BACKGROUND
The Kimpton Hotel, formerly Hotel Durell, will be a high-end lodging hotel with amenities including a restaurant, gym, spa, and meeting room. The hotel site is located between Central and Lighthouse Avenues, on the North and South, and Grand & Fountain Avenue on the West and East.
The Conditions of Approval for the hotel, approved by Resolution in September of 2018 and amended by Resolution in March of 2022 by the City Council, included various requirements. Condition of Approval 11 pertained specifically to the intersections adjacent to the project and states:
“Pedestrian safety. The Applicant shall pay for 25% of the cost for design and construction of the complete reconfiguration of the intersection of Central A venue and Fountain Avenue to provide an All-Way Stop intersection as identified in the Mitigation Measures of the Environmental Impact Report. The intersection redesign shall be consistent with the guidelines described in the "Pedestrian Safety Report" Prepared for the City by the Institute of Transportation Studies dated November dated November 2008.
The Applicant shall pay 25% of the cost for design and construction of the reconfiguration of the intersection of Central Ave, and Grand Ave. to accommodate a new raised pavement crosswalk across the intersection on the south side of Central Ave. The final project landscape plan for landscaping within the public right-of-way shall be designed to incorporate the new raised pavement crosswalk.”
PGCC 9-17-25
The final resolution, with the full list of the Conditions of Approval, can be found here.
ENGINEERING & DESIGN
In accordance with Condition 11, the City requested funding through the FY24/25 Capital Improvement Plan to begin evaluation of the intersections at Fountain & Central, and Grand and Central to enhance the vehicle and pedestrian safety. The City also commenced discussions related to the required improvements with the developer of the Kimpton Hotel.
Engineering is complete and the final plan set has been developed with the following scope.
A complete reconfiguration of Fountain and Central, with the intent of implementing a 4-way stop.
Construction of new curb ramps at all corners of the Fountain and Central Intersection (Curb ramp at Southwest corner of Fountain and Central is the responsibility of the hotel developer) Creation of a new driveway on the Northeast side of Central and Fountain adjacent to the Spiritual Center
Installation of 1,650 S.F of sidewalk
A bulb out on the southwest corner of Grand and Central and upgrade of all existing curb ramps (Curb ramp at Southeast corner of Grand and Central is the responsibility of the hotel developer) Improved stormwater controls will be installed
Reconstruction of 14,500 S.F. of pavement on Central
Reconstruction of 5,200 S.F of pavement on Grand
7,000 S.F. of asphalt overlay on Fountain
New road markings and signage on all three road segments City staff presented the project to the City Council at their June 4, 2025 meeting, at which time the Council accepted the plans to reconfigure the intersection and authorized staff to issue a call for bids for the project.
The City launched a Request for Proposals on July 3, 2025 and received four (4) bids on July 31, 2025.
CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT
Monterey Peninsula Engineering $657,634.00
Kraemer Engineering $696,561.80
Coastal Paving and Excavating $849,849.00
Precision Grade, Inc $850,426.00
Monterey Peninsula Engineering has qualified as the lowest responsible bidder.
AGREEMENT
If awarded, the City will use the standard construction contract approved by the City’s insurer, California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA).
NEXT STEPS
Once a contract is executed, the City will work with the contractor to develop a construction schedule.
KIMPTON HOTEL CONTRIBUTIONS
Per Condition of Approval #11 of the Architectural and Use Permit for the Kimpton Hotel, 25% of the design and construction of the intersection improvements at Fountain/Central and Grand/ Central are to be paid by the developer, along with $13,000 towards the roadway paving. To comply with Approval #11, the hotel developers are required to pay $86,976.12. The City will pave the remainder of the PGCC 9-17-25
surrounding roadways to address their deteriorated conditions. It is best to perform the paving work under one contract for coordination and quality control.
OPTIONS
Provide an alternative direction
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The Central, Grand & Fountain Avenue Street Improvements Project (CIP25-03) was approved in the FY24/25 CIP with a budget of $270,000 derived from the General Fund (Fund 63). To date, $41,099.50 has been expended on engineering. There is a $533,523.50 delta needed to fund the full project.
To bridge the gap on the delta, Public Works has requested the disbursement of the City’s fair share of Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) funds, distributed through the Transportation Agency for Monterey County, in an amount of $315,811, which utilizes all of our RSTP balance. Approval of the attached ordinance will allow the City to increase the Revenues of Regional Surface Transportation (RSTP) Fair Share allocation by $315,811 and expend the RSTP allocation on the Central, Grand and Fountain Avenue Street Improvement Project (CIP25-03) by $315,811.
In addition to the RSTP funds, the developers of the Kimpton hotel will contribute $86,976.12 towards the project. With the two additional revenues, $315,811 from the RSTP and the $86,976.12 from the Kimpton Hotel, the project has a delta of $124,590.38 (includes contingency and construction engineering management).
The City’s approved CIP includes $1.2 million of project funding, which has been earmarked for the FY 24/25 Street Rehabilitation Project. The City is still in the engineering phase for the Street Rehab project and minimal funding has been harnessed to date. The Central, Grand & Fountain Avenue Street Improvements Project funding delta ($124,590.38) could be addressed by transferring a portion of the $730,000 Measure X Fund (Fund 17) allocation earmarked for the Street Rehab project.
The purpose and intent of the Measure X funding allocations for both projects are similar and can be transferred from the Street Rehab project to the Central, Grand & Fountain Avenue Street Improvements Project internally. After the transfer, the City would still have $1.2 million that can be harnessed towards street rehab, including a portion of the General Fund allocation.
Performing this transfer to fully fund the Central, Grand & Fountain Avenue Street Improvements Project is prudent because completion of the project prior to the opening of the Kimpton Hotel will greatly improve pedestrian and vehicle safety.
FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Infrastructure
Attachments
Ordinance RSTP Allocation
PGCC 9-17-25
ORDINANCE NO. 25-xxx
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
AMENDING THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2025-26
FACTS
1. The City Council approved the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget on June 18, 2025.
2. It is customary to amend the budget to adjust revenues and expenditures to reflect updated information since the adoption of the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget.
3. The City Manager is recommending amendments to the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget to reflect the City Council goals for the fiscal year budget.
4. The Council has determined it is appropriate to amend the approved budget for FY 2025-26 to increase the Revenues of Regional Surface Transportation (RSTP) Fair Share allocation of $315,811 and expend the RSTP allocation on the Central, Grand and Fountain Avenue Street Improvement Project (CIP25-03) by $315,811, allowing for the reconfiguration of the Central, Grand and Fountain Avenue intersections and rehabilitation of deteriorated roadways.
5. Pursuant to Charter Article 15, an amendment of the budget must be approved by ordinance.
6. A summary of the Ordinance, approved by the City Attorney, was published on .
7. In the enactment of this ordinance, the City followed the guidelines adopted by the State of California and published in the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000, et seq.
8. Enactment of this ordinance action does not constitute a “project” as defined by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changesin the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The foregoing facts are adopted as findings of the City Council as set forth fully within the body of this ordinance.
SECTION 2. The Revenues budget for the following funds is amended, as stated herein, which by this reference are incorporated as set forth in its entirety.
Revenues Increase
20 Regional Surface Transportation Fund (TAMC) $315,811 SECTION 3. The Fiscal Year 2025/26 estimated fund balances based on this adjustment, are referenced herein:
Fund Beginning Fund
Balance
Revenue FY 25/26 Expenditures
FY 25/26
Preliminary Estimated
Ending Fund Balance
20 0 $315,811 $315,811 $0
PGCC 9-17-25
SECTION5. In accord with Article 15 of the City Charter, this ordinance shall become effective upon adoption hereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE this 3rd day of September 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
NICK SMITH, Mayor
ATTEST:
SANDRA KANDELL, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BRIAN A. PIERIK, City Attorney
PGCC 9-17-25
Agenda No. 8 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Nicholas Cina, Finance Management Analyst
MEETING DATE: September 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Check Register and Core Fund Summary - August 2025 CEQA:
RECOMMENDATION
1. Receive the Check Register and Core Fund Summary.
2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
DISCUSSION
In accordance with Article 23, a report including the monthly receipts, disbursements, and fund balances is attached.
In addition, a detailed listing of the check register is on the city’s website.
The check register is an account of monthly expenditures. It provides budgetary insight and promotes transparency. The check register is produced from the City’s financial system. The report groups the checks by the respective city fund. Attached is the check register report for August 2025.
The Administrative Services Department produces Monthly Core Financial reports to assist in evaluating the City's fiscal condition. The attached report provides details on General Fund revenues as well as a summary related to its other funds.
OPTIONS
N/A - This is informational only.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact. This is informational only.
FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.
Attachments
Check Register (By Detailed) - August 2025
Check Register (By Fund) - August 2025
PGCC 9-17-25
Check Register (By Fund) - August 2025
Core Fund Summary and GF Revenue
PGCC 9-17-25
Check Register - Summary by Detail - August 2025
Fund Check Date Name Description Amount
01 - General Fund 8/5/25 Us Bank D Delfino Invest Tr $ 117.95 K Clark Rec Uniform 120.18
M Khasimi Dock Stat 185.60
L Livian Calpelra M 390.00
S Arriola Mayor Air 436.97
Pd Trvl 5084 Animl 450.00
M Khasimi Hp Printe 546.24
M Khasimi Zoom Soft 702.15
R Gaither Conf Lodg 1,252.12
S Kandell Credit Tr (318.96)
M Khasimi Usb Adapt 7.38
K Clark Staff Train 8.99
S Arriola Travel In 29.45
K Clark Elop Suppli 49.50
Pd Trvl 5092 Ee Cak 57.50
Us Bank K Clark Volunteer 498.18
D Gonzales Apa Mbrs 591.00
F Marsh Dept Tshirt 1,316.08
M Khasimi Laptop 1,593.96
M Khasimi Cr Amazon (1,092.48)
C Day Hat Return (300.00)
M Khasimi Ms Pay Pe 1.01
L Livian Office Sup 7.20
M Mogensen Mty Herl 18.00
K Clark Elop Suppli 23.66
K Clark Trng Suppli 33.00
D Gho Mty Herald 34.00
F Marsh Csmfo Mtg 35.00
F Marsh Gfoa Semina 50.00
L Livian Ai Subscri 60.00
S Kandell Mayor Mtg 65.00
Pd Trvl 5084 Printi 71.34
S Hoffman Tlo Searc 75.00
K Clark Staff Trng 98.89
S Arriola Cc Dinner 103.94
A Canales Lib Suppl 111.18
M Mogensen Mbep Sem 118.00
L Frati Fy End Even 129.23
F Marsh Misac Mbrsh 130.00
L Livian Dept Mtg 137.96
A Canales Lib Suppl 140.93
C Day Jpia Conf Air 158.36
M Mogensen Award 180.00
S Arriola Ee Activi 307.62
S Arriola Cmo Mbrsh 370.50
M Khasimi Equip Rep 381.39
Pd Trvl 5084 Traini 437.45
Ca Dept Of Justice Cmo Backgrnd Checks 301.00
Hayward Lumber Comp Street Supplies 70.79
B&G Supplies 1,110.02
Kimball Midwest Streets Repair Stoc 175.94
B&G Repair Unit 61 309.19
Mech Stock 1,435.99
O'Reilly Auto Enter B&G Vehicle Repairs 135.88
Fd Vehicle Repairs 174.71
Street Vehicle Repa 7.42
Pacific Grove Hardw Fd Repair Supplies 48.65
B&G Vehicle Repairs 6.54
Fin Supplies 10.03
Cdd Supplies 30.72
Mech Supplies 44.96
Rec Supplies 52.16
Pd Repair Supplies 62.07
PGCC 9-17-25
Check Register - Summary by Detail - August 2025
Fund Check Date Name Description Amount
Rec Office Supplies $ 74.09
Pw Supplies 76.17
B&G Sm Tools 116.61
Museum Supplies 122.53
Lib Repair Supplies 131.22
Rec Pool Supplies 176.86
Street Supplies 730.40
B&G Maint Supplies 1,154.66
Sentry Alarm System Fy 24/25 Alarm Serv 250.00
Fy 24/25 Alarm Serv 1,532.46
Civicplus, Llc Social Media Archiv 4,617.27
Pacific Gas & Elect Golf St Elec 3438-9 44.47
Rec Electric 0956-9 4,426.72
8/8/25 Aflac Ded:5200 Aflac Prem 727.43
Ded:5201 Aflac P/T 1,406.89
Calif Law Enforcmen Ded:3200 Ltd Pd 512.00
Ded:3200 Ltd Pd (512.00)
Calpers Health Ded:128 Health Emp 556.45
Ded:2072 Health 1,109.00
Ded:129 Health 1,134.79
Ded:3053 Health Fam 1,446.77
Ded:2071 Health 1,462.50
Ded:126 Health 1,475.23
Ded:111 Health 1,633.65
Ded:108 Health 1,918.93
Ded:104 Health 2,027.40
Ded:112 Health 2,225.80
Ded:3051 Health Emp 2,225.80
Ded:116 Health 506.85
Ded:124 Health 4,425.69
Ded:103 Health 3,547.95
Ded:4304 Hlth Retro 3,632.54
Ded:106 Health 3,690.25
Ded:123 Health 5,673.95
Ded:105 Health 7,906.86
Ded:2073 Health Fam 8,331.00
Ded:122 Health 11,348.00
City Of Pacific Gro Ded:3301 Aflac Med 1,520.72
Eft Ded:*Fm Medicare 12,325.00
Ded:*Sca State Tax 17,057.97
Ded:*Ft Federal Tx 42,957.58
Ded:*Fm Medicare (12,325.00)
Ded:*Sca State Tax (17,057.97)
Ded:*Ft Federal Tx (42,957.58)
Pacific Grove City Ded:7000 Assoc Dues 909.50
Mass Mutual (457 Pl Ded:3999 Roth Ira 1,323.00
Ded:4000 Def Comp 11,661.60
Mtry County Dept Of Ded:0023 Garnish 463.07
Pacific Grove Manag Ded:7203 Assoc Dues 40.00
City Of Pacific Gro Ded:1009 Work Comp 424.19
Ded:1005 Work Comp 1,537.91
Ded:1010 Work Comp 3,418.97
Ded:1003 Work Comp 5,602.44
Ded:1006 Work Comp 55.65
City Of Pacific Gro Ded:7510 Pers Reimb 41.15
City Of Pacific Gro Ded:2103 Dental Fam 1,559.90
Ded:2101 Dentaleoee 978.98
Ded:2102 Dental+1Ee 1,022.08
Ded:200 Dentaleoer 303.17
City Of Pacific Gro Ded:0005 Suta 150.23
Pers Ded:2003 Pers Other 173.96
Ded:0022 Pers Sp Ms 269.21
Ded:08 Pers Other 348.83
PGCC 9-17-25
Check Register - Summary by Detail - August 2025
Fund Check Date Name Description Amount
Ded:0009 Pers Other $ 491.03
Ded:0018 Pers Sp Sf 492.98
Ded:0002 Pers 2,821.00
Ded:2001 Pers 2,193.46
Ded:01 Pers 9,583.36
Ded:07 Pers City 6,273.80
Ded:0006 Pers City 6,868.24
Ded:0017 Pers Rg Sf 7,054.56
Ded:0011 Pers Er Sf 7,675.79
Ded:2000 Pers Emply 3,784.48
Ded:0021 Pers Reg M 15,388.82
Ded:0020 Pers Er M3 16,082.31
Ded:0016 Pers-Retro 68.57
Ded:0004 Surv Ben 87.42
Ded:0019 Pers Rt Sf (3.44)
Police Officers Ass Ded:7204 Assoc Dues 8.00
Ded:7205 Assoc Dues 652.54
Legal Shield Ded:6100 Legal Svc 31.75
State Disability Ta Ded:0026 Sdi 5,206.30
Standard Insurance Ded:3500 Life Ins 1,417.50
Transamerica Employ Ded:5202 Transameri 311.82
Union Bank Of Calif Ded:4005 Pars-457 3,116.02
Vision Service Plan Ded:2502 Visioneoee 205.84
Ded:2503 Vision+1Ee 228.48
Ded:2504 Vision Fam 228.48
Ded:300 Visioneoer 66.40
Calif Law Enforcmen Aug Prem And Adj 256.00
Pers Ppe 7/19/25 Cont&Ad 80,748.37
Vision Service Plan Aug 2025 Supplement 6.34
July 2025 Supplemen 19.63
Eft Pay Date 8.8.25 71,755.15
8/15/25 Adrienne Cursio Rfnd Cancel Pool 25.00
Alexandra Beleche Rfnd Cancel Pool 1.25
Ali Davis Rfnd Cancel Pool 25.00
Alli Mayorga Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Allison Brooks Rfnd Cancel Pool 58.25
Amanda Zaballos Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
Amelia Howerton Rfnd Cancel Pool 25.00
Amy Lamonska Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
Amy Salgado Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Ana Meyer Rfnd Cancel Pool 22.50
Rfnd Requested 81.75
Ashley Velasquez Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Augusta Welty Rfnd Cancel Pool 22.50
Beau Jackson Rfnd Cancel Pool 37.50
Bridgett Dalke Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
Carolyn Snider Rfnd Requested 81.75
Chesli Manzo Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
Chloe Padgett Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Corie Beer Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Darina Pugacheva Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
David Lundgren Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Elizabeth Glass Rfnd Cancel Pool 25.00
Eric Meyer Rfnd Cancel Pool 22.50
Erica Downs-Karai Rfnd Cancel Pool 81.75
Erin Aragon Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Erin Drake-Prior Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
Esther Enea Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Eva Asturi Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Eva Sinotte Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Falynn St Dennis Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Fitriani Sani Rfnd Cancel Pool 22.50
Genee Cahill Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
PGCC 9-17-25
Check Register - Summary by Detail - August 2025
Fund Check Date Name Description Amount
George W Fuerst Rfnd Cancel Pool $ 11.25
Giacomo Paoletti Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Gina Perrone Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Gladys Rodriguez-Mo Rfnd Requested 89.25
Harumi Gunn Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Kathleen Davies Rfnd Cancel Pool 22.50
Kendall Marsh Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Kerrie Smith Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Kristen Deis Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
Kristin Makowski Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Laurie Heilbron Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Lia Simmons Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Margaret Masquelier Rfnd Cancel Pool 25.00
Maria Hauman Rfnd Cancel Pool 25.00
Matthew Logan Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Maureen Boese Rfnd Cancel Pool 22.50
Monica Schmidt Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
Nicole Dotto Rfnd Cancel Pool 22.50
Nikki Hueffmeier Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
Patrick Perez Rfnd Cancel Pool 25.00
Quincey Brinker Rfnd Cancel Pool 22.50
Robin Pelc Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Sa Vanna Baker Leyv Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Samantha Fischer Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Samantha Synold Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
Sophie Gates Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Rfnd Cancel Pool 22.50
Stephanie Paclot Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Susan Stoddard Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
Sydney Lundy Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
Tara Kopec Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
Taylor Pike Rfnd Cancel Pool 22.50
Tracy Turpen Rfnd Cancel Pool 33.75
Amy Hunt Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Anette Granberg Rfnd Cancel Pool 22.50
Anne Bauer-Civiello Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Bonnie Post Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Claire Dunsford Rfnd Cancel Pool 22.50
Florencia De La Pen Rfnd Cancel Pool 58.25
Frida Raasok Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
Heather Conner Rfnd Cancel Pool 84.00
Katie Barefoot Rfnd Cancel Pool 22.50
Katie Zerbe Rfnd Cancel Pool 22.50
Krista Knuffke Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
Leah Bernardini Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Nicole Lucido Rfnd Cancel Pool 42.00
Robyn Hawkins Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Shaminder Kler Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
Stacie Tarrant Rfnd Cancel Pool 11.25
Stephanie Deyerle Rfnd Cancel Pool 42.00
Tyler Thompson Rfnd Cancel Pool 12.50
Vanessa Anaya Rfnd Cancel Pool 42.00
Pacific Gas & Elect Forest Centrl Spr 0.10
17 Mi Dr Ballpark 0.16
Caledonia Pk Lights 0.17
117 Recreation Room 5.77
Lovers Point 6.23
Berwick Park 6.65
Platt Pk Sprnklr 7.86
17 Mi Dr Ballpark 8.11
Forest Centrl Spr 9.75
Caledonia Pk Lights 9.83
168 16Th St 10.01
PGCC 9-17-25
Check Register - Summary by Detail - August 2025
Fund Check Date Name Description Amount
17 Mi Dr Ballpark $ 10.36
Corp Yard Dm & 5Th 13.58
Parking Lot Light 14.78
Corp Yard Sunset Dr 17.22
117 Recreation Room 21.15
Grand Av & Pk Pl 21.87
Cor Melrose 15.61
Lovers Point 22.87
Phone Booth-Berwick 23.85
Platt Pk Sprnklr 26.19
Piedmont & Moreland 26.68
1307 Forst Sinex Si 27.21
1307 Forst Pine Sig 29.41
300 16Th St. 48.02
101 Ch-Cdd - 50% 51.68
101 Ch-Fin - 50% 51.69
Cor Melrose 41.45
17 Mi Dr Ballpark 54.46
Concession Stand 63.39
1307 Forst Sinex Si 69.32
1307 Forst Pine Sig 73.63
162 16Th Street 89.13
Oceanview & 17Th 94.99
Chautauqua Hall 99.20
City Council - 3% 99.41
Recreation - 3% 99.41
17 Mile Drive 122.55
117 Community Ctr 127.37
17Th St & Laurel 141.73
City Council - 3% 77.69
Recreation - 3% 77.69
Finance - 7% 181.26
Chautauqua Hall 187.17
300 Forest Ave 202.43
Beach Boat Storage 202.96
Public Library 208.75
Fire Dept 213.43
Finance - 7% 231.98
Forest 40 Ft E/O Lh 243.57
165 Forest Ave 245.21
Cedd - 9.5% 246.01
City Manager - 9.5% 246.01
117 Community Ctr 280.88
Cedd - 9.5% 314.81
City Manager - 9.5% 314.81
Police Dept 414.93
117 Community Ctr 433.08
Forest 40 Ft E/O Lh 527.89
Fire Dept - 24% 621.49
Forest & Central Dr 637.76
17Th St & Laurel 640.29
550 Central Ave 768.08
Fire Dept - 24% 795.31
580 Pine Ave - Loan 1,046.81
Police Dept - 43% 1,113.51
Forest & Central Dr 1,235.15
Police Dept - 43% 1,424.94
Public Library 1,530.67
620 Ocean View Pool 2,045.27
Amazon Capital Serv Pd Pio Equipment 1,091.41
Pd Office Supplies 908.56
American Red Cross Rec Lifeguard Train 360.00
Rec Lifegrd Trainin 188.00
PGCC 9-17-25
Check Register - Summary by Detail - August 2025
Fund Check Date Name Description Amount
Rec Cpr Certificate $ 320.00
Andrew Lipsig Reimb Rec Snacks 30.63
Arcpoint Labs Of Mo Cmo Pre Employmt 330.00
Blue Strike Environ Agreement For Clima 3,164.00
Bureau Veritas Tech 2025 Fcas - 10 Faci 16,596.21
Burke, Williams & S Legal Services 51,450.16
Chicago Title Compa Prof Services Fwmn 500.00
Dell Marketing Lp Microsoft 365 Licen 21,388.20
Denise Duffy & Asso Gw Park Mgmt 2,090.76
Mnd Crespi Pond 872.50
Gemma Peterson Pmt For Yoga Classe 806.40
Grove Market Rec Prgm Supplies 38.92
Rec Camp Supplies 14.36
Rec Supplies 15.87
Rec Traing Supplies 24.04
Hdl Coren & Cone Fy24/25 Acfr Stat P 795.00
Monterey County Wee Cty Cncl Bid Ad 96.00
Cty Cncl Ph Fee Ad 144.00
Cty Cncl 2Nd Read A 120.00
Cty Cncl Salary Ad 120.00
Monterey Peninsula Cmo Fitness Assess 60.00
Cmo Fitness Assess (60.00)
Original Watermen, Rec Uniform Supplie 3,208.88
Ups Pd Shipping 79.29
Pd Shipping 1.72
Vestis Services, Ll Pd Linen Services 182.31
California Peace Of Pd Cpoa Membership 895.00
Accent Clean & Swee Fy 25/26 Street Swe 18,810.00
Amazon Capital Serv Pd Office Supplies 58.91
Pd Training Supplie 147.35
Pd Office Supplies 584.40
Lib Alarm Battery 187.34
American Supply Com Janitorial Supplies 9,484.33
Arcpoint Labs Of Mo Cm Pre Emply Screen 55.00
At&T Lh Internet 122.34 122.34
At&T Calnet 3 Lib Internet 3343 444.65
Admin Phone 3242 2,131.86
Pd Data Lines 8120 1,053.09
Admin Internet 3342 31.58
Austin Hertel Reimb Class B Lic 98.00
Axon Enterprise, In Pd Wiring Kit Unit 355.06
Bound Tree Medical, Pd First Aid Kits 303.38
Caltronics Business Rec Konica Copier L 12.91
Carina Alexander Wlle Training 318.00
Carmel Pine Cone Cty Cncl Bid Notice 87.75
Centralsquare Techn Fin Training Servic 1,080.00
Wm.J. Clark Truckin Decomposed Granite 6,032.05
Decomposed Granite 6,032.06
Comcast City Hall Tv 003903 14.08
Ch Internet 0085844 153.24
Darryl Pang Pd Polygraphs 750.00
Fastrak Fd Benz Toll Fee 8.00
Fitzgerald Brown Reimb Pd Vest 250.00
Forest Hill Ace Har Rec Supplies 19.64
Rec Supplies 19.64
Gachina Landscape M Park Mowing Service 1,387.00
Gardaworld Aug Service Fees 99.29
Granite Constructio Streets Stock 472.09
Granite Rock Compan Street Stock Suppli 2,345.41
Grove Market Rec Camp Supplies 10.58
Rec Program Supplie 62.89
Hayward Lumber Comp Street Supplies 250.52
B&G Repair Supplies 1,169.26
PGCC 9-17-25
Check Register - Summary by Detail - August 2025
Fund Check Date Name Description Amount
Heihachiro Takarabe Pmt For Tai Chi Cla $ 84.00
Jcg Technologies In Ams Annual Renewal 12,776.00
Jd Repairs Inc Fd Repairs Unit 641 949.81
Kimball Midwest Street Repair Unit 42.04
Mech Stock Supplies 1,072.15
Secure Solutions Pd Background Svcs 2,194.35
Pd Background Svcs 400.00
Pd Background Svc 2,050.30
Language Line Servi Pd Language Svcs 53.45
Mccleoa Membership Dues 500.00
Michael Harvey Truc Concrete Hauling 1,645.00
Mission Linen Suppl Fire Dept Linen Jul 332.12
Mission Uniform Ser Linen / Uniform Cle 126.66
Linen / Uniform Cle 240.88
Linen / Uniform Cle 516.95
Linen / Uniform Cle 516.95
Linen / Uniform Cle 516.95
Monterey Bay Pest C Rodent Control For 135.00
Rodent Control For 175.00
Rodent Control For 135.00
Rodent Control For 180.00
Rodent Control For 180.00
Rodent Control For 490.00
Rodent Control For 135.00
Rodent Control For 175.00
Monterey One Water Pw Sewer Trmt 121.98
Lib Sewer Trmt 121.98
B&G Sewer Trmt 4,382.92
Pd Sewer Trmt 853.86
Museum Sewer Trmt 480.12
Fd Sewer Trmt 487.92
Rec Sewer Trmt 731.88
Odp Business Soluti Asd Office Supplies 331.84
O'Reilly Auto Enter B&G Repair Supplies 533.55
Pw Repair Supplies 127.27
Pd Repair Supplies 229.39
Mech Repair Supplie 101.53
Sewer Repair Suppli 28.39
Orlando Perez Vest Reimbursement 250.00
Pacific West Water Cdd Water System 42.85
Asd Water System 42.85
P.F. Pettibone & Co Cty Cncl Office Sup 284.50
Primo Brands Pd Water Services 197.83
Rhomar Industries, Street Stock Suppli 1,504.08
Dunnigan Psychologi Pd Psych Evaluation 650.00
Same Day Shred Cmo Shred Services 50.00
Sir Speedy Cty Cncl Bus Cards 64.01
Cdd Bus Cards 93.51
Pw Bus Cards 93.95
Pw Bus Cards 192.23
Sj Permits Reimb Permit Fees 935.63
Speakwrite Pd Transcriptn Svcs 25.78
Spring City Electri Street Lamp Parts 8,376.00
The Monterey County Cty Cncl Bid Ad 126.40
Tope'S Tree Service Contract Tree Servi 21,060.00
Toro Petroleum Corp Fd Diesel July 1,899.26
Underground Service Ca State Reg Cost 1,041.00
Ups Pd Shipping 7.85
Vestis Services, Ll Pd Linen Services 182.31
Pd Linen Services 182.31
Pd Linen Services 182.31
Pd Linen Services 182.31
Via Heart Project Pd Aed Batteries 1,994.00
PGCC 9-17-25
Check Register - Summary by Detail - August 2025
Fund Check Date Name Description Amount
Watsonville Ford Street Repair Unit $ 991.33
Pd Repairs Unit 5 344.00
Mech Repairs Unit 3 610.43
Streets Repr Unit 1 47.87
Brian Whitson Monthly Museum Jani 2,100.00
Sunnie Picaso Reimb Per Diem Trai 215.00
8/21/25 Robert Half Finance Temp Accoun 6,955.57
Home Depot Usa Inc. Library Maintenance 22.00
Robert Allen Kirvin Pd Backgrounds 2,625.00
Blue Star Investiga Pd Backgrounds 1,600.00
8/22/25 Pers Aug 2025 Ual 395,585.00
Aflac Ded:5201 Aflac P/T 1,406.89
Ded:5200 Aflac Prem 727.43
Calpers Health Ded:2072 Health 1,109.00
Ded:129 Health 1,134.79
Ded:3053 Health Fam 1,446.77
Ded:116 Health 506.85
Ded:128 Health Emp 556.45
Ded:2071 Health 1,462.50
Ded:126 Health 1,475.23
Ded:4304 Hlth Retro 64.74
Ded:111 Health 1,633.65
Ded:108 Health 1,918.93
Ded:104 Health 2,027.40
Ded:112 Health 2,225.80
Ded:3051 Health Emp 2,225.80
Ded:103 Health 3,547.95
Ded:106 Health 3,690.25
Ded:123 Health 5,673.95
Ded:124 Health 4,425.69
Ded:105 Health 7,906.86
Ded:2073 Health Fam 8,331.00
Ded:122 Health 11,348.00
City Of Pacific Gro Ded:3301 Aflac Med 1,520.72
Eft Ded:*Fm Medicare 11,785.80
Ded:*Sca State Tax 17,837.50
Ded:*Ft Federal Tx 44,465.63
Franchise Tax Board Ded:7502 Wage Garn 1,368.78
Pacific Grove City Ded:7000 Assoc Dues 909.50
Mass Mutual (457 Pl Ded:3999 Roth Ira 1,323.00
Ded:4000 Def Comp 11,661.60
Mtry County Dept Of Ded:0023 Garnish 463.07
Pacific Grove Manag Ded:7203 Assoc Dues 40.00
City Of Pacific Gro Ded:1006 Work Comp 55.78
Ded:1005 Work Comp 1,540.53
Ded:1010 Work Comp 3,694.55
Ded:1009 Work Comp 181.68
Ded:1003 Work Comp 5,716.83
City Of Pacific Gro Ded:7510 Pers Reimb 41.15
City Of Pacific Gro Ded:2103 Dental Fam 1,559.90
Ded:2101 Dentaleoee 978.98
Ded:2102 Dental+1Ee 1,022.08
Ded:200 Dentaleoer 303.17
City Of Pacific Gro Ded:0005 Suta 143.47
Pers Ded:2003 Pers Other 173.96
Ded:2000 Pers Emply 3,784.48
Ded:2001 Pers 2,193.46
Ded:15 Pers-Retro (69.70)
Ded:0019 Pers Rt Sf (3.44)
Ded:0004 Surv Ben 87.42
Ded:07 Pers City 6,159.52
Ded:0006 Pers City 6,710.34
Ded:0017 Pers Rg Sf 7,054.56
PGCC 9-17-25
Check Register - Summary by Detail - August 2025
Fund Check Date Name Description Amount
Ded:0011 Pers Er Sf $ 7,673.53
Ded:01 Pers 9,475.28
Ded:0021 Pers Reg M 15,421.32
Ded:0020 Pers Er M3 16,116.30
Ded:0002 Pers 2,821.00
Ded:0022 Pers Sp Ms 269.78
Ded:08 Pers Other 345.70
Ded:0009 Pers Other 481.88
Ded:0018 Pers Sp Sf 490.75
Police Officers Ass Ded:7205 Assoc Dues 652.54
State Disability Ta Ded:0026 Sdi 4,984.07
Transamerica Employ Ded:5202 Transameri 311.82
Union Bank Of Calif Ded:4005 Pars-457 821.34
Vision Service Plan Ded:2502 Visioneoee 205.84
Ded:2504 Vision Fam 228.48
Ded:2503 Vision+1Ee 228.48
Ded:300 Visioneoer 66.40
Ded:300 Visioneoer (66.40)
Ded:2502 Visioneoee (205.84)
Ded:2504 Vision Fam (228.48)
Ded:2503 Vision+1Ee (228.48)
Vision Service Plan Sept 25 Cover Visio 671.78
8/29/25 California American 643 Hydrants Hydt 45.30
Mech 5% 49.87
165 Forest-Museum 62.60
Central 4 In Fire 62.60
600 Pine Ave Fire 62.60
300 Forest Ave 62.60
2100 Sunset Drive 80.09
582 Lighthse Irrig 80.09
765 Lighthse Irrig 81.53
800 Lighthse Plante 81.53
792 Lighthse Irrig 81.53
308 16Th St. 81.53
748 Lighthse Irrg 81.53
840 Lighthse Plante 81.53
850 Lighthse Plante 81.53
882 Lighthse Plante 81.53
106 7Th St Park 81.53
304 16Th St Fire 99.98
B & G 15% 149.60
611 Central Ave 163.11
Sunset-Corpyard18% 179.52
300 Forest Irrig 186.44
139 Grand Ave 212.10
585 Laurel 215.32
130 Lighthouse Irri 219.17
600 Pine 316.02
165 Forest Ave Fir 358.92
300 Forest Fire-50% 419.67
300 Forest Fire-50% 419.67
St Fund 50% 498.67
300 Forest Ave 507.29
100 Oceanvw Irrig 516.30
196 Oceanvw Irrig 516.30
515 Junipero 588.06
580 Pine 626.95
304 16Th St Bdom-Fr 883.66
610 Oceanvw Irrigpk 1,088.26
550 Central 1,203.28
1051 Oceanview Irrg 1,308.68
707 Oceanview-Naiad 1,471.07
620 Oceanview/Bath 1,571.06
PGCC 9-17-25
Check Register - Summary by Detail - August 2025
Fund Check Date Name Description Amount
1025 Morse-Platt Pk $ 1,571.60
711 Oceanview Irrg 2,108.24
616 Oceanvw-Swim Pl 2,249.25
863 Oceanview Irrg 2,277.21
930 Sinex 2,411.45
114 Caledonia Pk 2,427.60
980 Piedmont Ball P 3,120.35
230 17-Mile Drive 3,338.40
616 Oceanview Irrg 3,539.34
150 Forest-Jewell P 5,179.08
391 Oceanvw-Berwick 8,939.27
Drought Resistant N Landscape Supplies 22.78
Landscape Supplies 80.30
Imperial County Off Mrc Fy25 Apr-June Q 1,676.76
Odp Business Soluti Cdd Office Supplies 44.13
Cdd Office Supplies 119.27
Scholastic Inc. Cmo Shred Svcs 50.00
4Leaf Building Dept Servi 5,236.70
Admir Varajic Rfnd Permit Fees 210.00
Amazon Capital Serv B&G Small Tools 211.93
Pd Books Supplies 106.75
Pd Office Supplies 122.29
Cem Small Tools 91.66
Pw Office Supplies 102.07
Pd Office Supplies 17.29
Pw Office Supplies 21.66
Cdd Office Supplies 13.07
Pd Office Supplies 22.94
Pd Patrol Equipment 406.38
At&T Admin Phone 2539 31.54
Rec Phone 0960 31.54
At&T Calnet 3 Admin Internet 3342 31.16
Ch Genrtr Alarm 325 31.71
Baker & Taylor Comp Books & Materials / 127.14
Boot Barn Inc Streets Safety Boot 247.10
B&G Safety Boots 446.50
Bound Tree Medical, Pd Office Supplies 402.52
Burke, Williams & S City Atty Services 51,408.35
Catherine Delbiaggi Per Diem Training 318.00
Centralsquare Techn Finance Software Fy 5,211.10
Chicago Title Compa Escrow 525400689 118.00
Christinea Monson Rfnd Permit Fees 286.00
Comcast Pd Internet 0387836 151.24
Pw Internet 0194117 228.74
Pw Internet 0389527 106.24
Rec Internet 021497 99.21
County Of Monterey Ceqa Noe Gw Park Ad 50.00
Salinas Valley Tire Pw Repair Unit Load 482.72
Coast Counties Glas Lib Glass Repair 487.00
Demco Inc Lib Office Supplies 168.78
Doctors On Duty Med Dmv Physical 150.00
Dudek Dudek Corp - 209 Ca 2,465.00
Engineered Fire Sys Fd Plan Review July 1,012.50
Ewing Irrigation Pr Irrigation Supplies 1,637.37
Ferguson Enterprise B&G Repair Supplies 657.37
Fd Repair Supplies 358.52
Field Of Dreams Des B&G Crew Hats 283.37
Streets Crew Hats 141.68
Forest Hill Ace Har Rec Supplies Balanc 63.37
Gosby House Inn Pd Storage Hearing 246.00
Granite Constructio Street Supplies 472.71
C.C.O.I. Gate & Fen B&G Gate Maintenanc 180.00
Hdl Coren & Cone July Fee Study 2,100.00
PGCC 9-17-25
Check Register - Summary by Detail - August 2025
Fund Check Date Name Description Amount
Kevin Shum Per Diem Training $ 93.00
Knowbe4, Inc Security Software 4,441.50
Liebert Cassidy Whi Cty Atty Legal Svcs 2,619.00
Cmo Legal Services 970.00
Cmo Legal Services 388.00
Cmo Legal Services 533.50
Locc - Monterey Bay Mb Division Meeting 200.00
Monterey Bay Pest C Rodent Control For 490.00
Monterey County Dis Dui Rev Contributio 1,044.23
Monterey County Wee Cdd Ph-115 Forest A 288.00
Bid Notice Amend 96.00
Quadient Finance Us Postage 1,054.36
Odp Business Soluti Cdd Office Supplies 52.50
Cdd Office Supplies 83.73
Cdd Office Supplies 51.76
Cdd Office Supplies 69.94
Finance Chair 185.17
Finance Office Chai 146.90
Cdd Office Credit (37.86)
Cdd Office Supplies 21.84
Cdd Office Supplies 6.54
Cdd Office Supp Cre (62.50)
Cdd Office Supplies 31.67
Cdd Office Supplies 25.68
Pacific Gas & Elect Rec Electric 4030-4 547.44
Pw Admin Elec 5508- 1,662.46
Pacific Products & Street Supplies 609.67
Pacific Smog Do Not B&G Repairs Unit 51 (43.75)
B&G Repairs Unit 51 43.75
Page & Turnbull Ch Hall Fed Registe 3,841.25
Potter'S Electronic B&G Clubhouse Suppl 10.90
Ch Generator Repair 65.53
Pure Water Pw Water Svc Aug 29.20
Mech Water Svc Aug 29.20
B&G Water Svc Aug 29.20
Street Water Svc Au 29.20
Primo Brands Rec Water Services 138.23
Fd Water Services 245.31
Rincon Consultants, Rincon - Housing El 18,349.29
Rydin Decal Res Parking Permits 430.88
Sentry Alarm System Gc Alarm Maint 250.00
Ch Fire Alarm Svc 250.00
Ch Generator Svc Ca 250.00
Sunnie Picaso Per Diem Training 385.00
Taylor Van Rossum Pd Vehicle Release 246.00
Trucksis Enterprise Pd Bus Cards 54.60
Pd Us Flags 370.39
Ups Ups Shipping 50.00
Vestis Services, Ll Pd Linen Services 182.31
Pd Linen Services 182.31
Vivian L. Valero Per Diem Training 318.00
Watsonville Chrysle Pd Repairs Unit 7 230.91
Pd Repairs Unit 7 95.70
Wells Fargo Vendor Konica Lease Fy25/2 169.21
Konica Lease Fy25/2 195.01
Konica Lease Fy25/2 216.78
Konica Lease Fy25/2 216.80
Konica Lease Fy25/2 216.80
Konica Lease Fy25/2 216.80
Konica Lease Fy25/2 232.67
Brian Whitson Ch Cleaning 380.00
Ch Cleaning 380.00
Pacific Smog B&G Smog Unit 51 43.75
PGCC 9-17-25
Check Register - Summary by Detail - August 2025
Fund Check Date Name Description Amount
Monterey Sports Cen Cmo Fitness Assesmt $ 60.00
06 - State Franchise Peg Access Media Produc Amp Contract Renewa 13,000.00 Amp Contract Renewa 13,000.00
08 - Museum Improvement Fund Prime Flooring Co Pacific Grove Museu 21,307.00 10 - Hospitality Imprvmt Dist. 8/5/25 See Monterey Mctid Apr-June 2025 61,389.54 Pacific Grove Chamb Hid Apr-June 2025 32,131.54
11 - Library Book Fund 8/15/25 Amazon Capital Serv Lib Books & Materia 132.24 Lib Books & Materia 7.64
Lib Books & Materia 8.73
Midwest Tape Lib Books & Materia 158.79
Lib Books & Materia 80.83
Overdrive, Inc. Lib Books & Materia 3,500.00
Lib Books & Materia 2.99
Lib Books & Materia 11.96
Lib Books & Materia 23.92
8/29/25 Amazon Capital Serv Lib Books & Materia 100.58
Lib Books & Materia 72.50
Lib Books & Materia 17.69
Lib Books & Materia 284.35
Baker & Taylor Comp Books & Materials / 1,435.46
Midwest Tape Lib Books & Materia 38.23
Lib Books & Materia 258.87
17 - Local Streets And Roads 8/15/25 Neill Engineers Cor David Avenue Street 5,566.50 David Avenue Street 10,042.50
David Avenue Street 20,316.00
18 - Gas Tax Fund 8/5/25 Us Bank D Gho Cadfta Maint 746.12 D Gho Process Fee 17.16
8/15/25 Pacific Gas & Elect Forest Av Sunset Av 57.80
Forest Ave Sunset A 51.87
Forest Av Sunset Av 22.34
Forest Ave Sunset A 23.54
19Th & Sunset Dr. 15.52
Caltrans Signal Svc Apr-June 2,641.77
Highco Builders Sidewalk Dev Projec 23,841.00
8/22/25 Pers Aug 2025 Ual 2,373.42
8/29/25 California American Cem 4% 39.88
Bear Electrical Sol May Trffc Sign Main 250.00
4Leaf Fy 25/26 On-Call Tr 4,640.00
Bear Electrical Sol Jul Signal Maintena 250.00
Pacific Gas & Elect Pw Electric 4482-4 9,066.05
24 - Stillwell Children'S Pool 8/15/25 American Supply Com Pool Supplies 1,280.19 8/29/25 Peninsula Pool Serv Pool Supplies 75.35
25 - Recreation Donation Fund 8/21/25 Home Depot Usa Inc. Rec Refrigerator 862.57 27 - Lighthouse Maint.& Impv. 8/5/25 Pacific Grove Hardw Lh Repair Supplies 49.36 8/15/25 Pacific Gas & Elect Asilomar Blvd Pg Lh 142.94
Asilomar Blvd Pg Lh 66.59
Monterey One Water Lh Sewer Trmt 121.98
Ziga Media Llc Lh Merchandise 940.00
8/29/25 California American 90 Asilomar 170.28
At&T Calnet 3 Lh Phone 3247 31.23
Escarraga'S Luxury Lh Cleaning 480.00
Jennifer Langford Lh Office Supplies 24.76
34 - Cdbg Grant Fund 8/28/25 Old Republic Title Cdbg Loan 201202500 199,000.00 40 - Poetry Promotion Fund 8/5/25 Us Bank R Gaither Cancel Cr (515.00) Us Bank R Gaither Poetry Pr 140.17
8/15/25 Hearfelt Creations Lib Poetry Promotio 600.00
Monterey One Water Poetry Sewer Trmt 177.66
Vali Marie Francis Poetry Promo Sept 220.00
8/29/25 Vali Marie Francis Poetry Promotion 220.00
42 - Pub Safety Aug Fund County Of Monterey Emergncy Dispatch 3,009.00 43 - Slesf Fund Ca Dept Of Justice Pd Livescans 592.00
63 - Capital Improv Proj Fund 8/15/25 Neill Engineers Cor Streets Sidewalk Im 14,541.00 Streets Sidewalk Im 12,134.50
PGCC 9-17-25
Check Register - Summary by Detail - August 2025
Fund Check Date Name Description Amount
8/21/25 City Of Monterey Cip Prescott Ave Si $ 113,101.66 8/29/25 Green Valley Landsc Monarch Butterfly S 18,765.42 The Monterey County Cip Legal Ads 421.98
70 - Emp Benefit Fund 8/8/25 Calpers Health Aug2025 Ret & Chang 13,033.73 Standard Insurance Aug 2025 Premiums 3,084.90
July 2025 Premiums 3,087.61
Standard Insurance July 2025 Dental 7,878.40
8/15/25 Claremont Behaviora Eap Aug Services 648.15
8/22/25 Custom Equipment Co Sept 2025 Life Prem (3,086.79) Sept 2025 Life Prem 3,086.79
Standard Insurance Aug 2025 Dental 8,042.60
Standard Insurance Sept 2025 Life Prem 3,086.79
Employment Developm Ui Claim Pe 6.30.20 1,458.24
8/29/25 Pars Ars Pars June Fees 371.05
71 - Workers Comp Fund 8/22/25 Pers Aug 2025 Ual 1,000.83 72 - Liability Ins Fund 8/15/25 California Jpia Pollution Liab Insu 5,445.00 8/22/25 Pers Aug 2025 Ual 890.00
74 - Local Water Project 8/5/25 Pacific Gas & Elect Lwp Elec 0792-1 14,254.57 8/15/25 Monterey One Water Lwp Sewer Trmt 22,739.39
8/29/25 California American 1313 Ocean View Blv 2,701.54 Perc Water Corporat Lwp O&M July Fy 26 50,682.50
75 - Cemetery Fund 8/5/25 Hayward Lumber Comp Cemetery Supplies 71.06 Pacific Grove Hardw Cem Supplies 221.68
8/15/25 Pacific Gas & Elect Crest & Ripple 12.32
Cemetery - 1% 33.14
Cemetery 35.37
Cemetery - 1% 25.90
Hayward Lumber Comp Cem Supplies 71.06
Mission Uniform Ser Linen / Uniform Cle 516.96
O'Reilly Auto Enter Cem Repair Supplies 119.74
8/22/25 Pers Aug 2025 Ual 4,105.92
8/29/25 California American 1254 Delmontecem70% 607.31
Sewer 8% 79.79
Llorin-Velasquez Co Fy 25/26 Cemetery J 2,700.00
Fy 25/26 Cemetery A 2,700.00
76 - Sewer Fund 8/5/25 Pacific Gas & Elect Pw Sewer True Up Ch 36,465.36 Pw Sewer Elec 4175- 55.02
8/15/25 Pacific Gas & Elect Eardley Pump #1 173.56
17Th & Ocnvw 84.42
Pump Sunset Arena 203.08
Pump 17Th & Ocnvw 204.06
471 Ocean View Bl. 299.96
O V 9Th Pump #2 954.41
Pump Sunset Arena 434.00
360 Ocean View Blvd 461.27
Pump Station 25.49
520 Ocean View Blvd 23.17
Pump Russell Svc Ct 16.40
1996 Sunset Dr. 68.94
Eardley Pump #1 74.46
Pump Russell Svc Ct 57.81
471 Ocean View Bl. 142.92
Oceanview Blvd & 8T 7.92
Pump Sunset Arena 13.58
1996 Sunset Dr. 22.02
520 Ocean View Blvd 6.49
California Marine S Coral St Testing 276.80
Monterey One Water Fog / Storm Water P 31,237.29
Wallace Group Ssmp Annual Audit 366.26
Ssmp Annual Audit 2,556.95
Ssmp Annual Audit 5,457.50
Scsmp 1, 6, 9 Cip24 10,411.08
Mission Uniform Ser Linen / Uniform Cle 516.95
PGCC 9-17-25
Check Register - Summary by Detail - August 2025
Fund Check Date Name Description Amount
8/21/25 Cal Oes Fema De-Obligated P $ 11,748.00
8/22/25 Pers Aug 2025 Ual 12,774.67
8/29/25 California American 1273 Crespi Pond 50 119.82
100 Oceanvw Irrig 81.53
263 Grove Acres 5,169.44
Monterey One Water Grease Storm Wtr Pr 2,305.66
Lift Station Mainte 38,645.88
Annual Mrswp 24/25 19,161.30
Wallace Group Scsmp 1, 6, 9 Cip24 5,923.41
At&T Pw Sewer Phone 0576 31.54
Pw Sewer Phone 1261 31.54
Pw Sewer Phone 1395 31.54
Pw Sewer Phone 2931 31.54
Boot Barn Inc Sewer Safety Boots 247.10
Capital One Public Wastewater Interest 8,436.30
Wastewater Principa 36,345.46
Field Of Dreams Des Sewer Crew Hats 141.68
Pure Water Sewer Water Svc Aug 29.20
The Monterey County Cip23-06 Legal Ads 137.58
77 - Golf Fund 8/15/25 Pacific Gas & Elect 1313 Ocean View Blv 100.87 1313 Ocean View Blv 44.41
8/29/25 California American 77 Asilomar Golf Hs 2,536.27 1273 Crespi Pond 50 119.83
1254 Delmontegolf30 260.27
77 Asilomar Fire Sv 99.98
Grand Total $ 2,447,512.29
PGCC 9-17-25
Check Register Report - Summary by Fund - August 2025
Fund Amount
01 - General Fund Total $ 1,388,306.91
06 - State Franchise Peg Total 26,000.00
08 - Museum Improvement Fund Total 21,307.00
10 - Hospitality Imprvmt Dist. Total 93,521.08
11 - Library Book Fund Total 6,134.78
17 - Local Streets And Roads Total 35,925.00
18 - Gas Tax Fund Total 44,036.47
24 - Stillwell Children'S Pool Total 1,355.54
25 - Recreation Donation Fund Total 862.57
27 - Lighthouse Maint.& Impv. Total 2,027.14
34 - Cdbg Grant Fund Total 199,000.00
40 - Poetry Promotion Fund Total 842.83
42 - Pub Safety Aug Fund Total 3,009.00
43 - Slesf Fund Total 592.00
63 - Capital Improv Proj Fund Total 158,964.56
70 - Emp Benefit Fund Total 40,691.47
71 - Workers Comp Fund Total 1,000.83
72 - Liability Ins Fund Total 6,335.00
74 - Local Water Project Total 90,378.00
75 - Cemetery Fund Total 11,300.25
76 - Sewer Fund Total 232,010.36
77 - Golf Fund Total 3,161.63
Grand Total $ 2,366,762.42
PGCC 9-17-25
Revenues by Fund - FY 2025-26 (Unaudited)
Through August 2025
Fund Revised Budget YTD
YTD % of
Budget Prior YTD
Projected
Change for
Fiscal Year
Projected
Ending
Reserves *
Main Fund - Fund 01 $ 32,729,400 $ 1,543,750 5% $ 924,515 $ (1,969,722) $ 13,251,660 Other Funds Included 1,027,610 - 0% 6,842 (110,640) 66,911 General Fund 33,757,010 1,543,750 5% 931,357 (2,080,362) 13,318,571 Capital Projects $ 506,682 $ - 0% $ - (143,318) 2,175,613 Capital Funds 506,682 - 0% - (143,318) 2,175,613
Local Water Project 1,288,746 208,325 16% 194,146 263,641 (62,717) Cemetery 580,902 64,589 11% 109,217 (267,207) 784,500
Sewer 4,099,809 662,402 16% - 154,540 9,451,305
Golf 956,538 81,465 9% 49,082 (70,144) 902,000
Sewer Lateral Loans 3,908 - 0% - 3,908 185,313
Enterprise Funds 6,929,903 1,016,781 15% 352,445 84,738 11,260,401 Employee Benefit 316,299 22,174 7% 18,223 3,599 67,759
Worker's Compensation 925,299 166,383 18% 62,330 8,351 217,926 Liability Insurance 753,944 7,690 1% - (128,223) 921,983 Internal Service Funds 1,995,542 196,247 10% 80,553 (116,273) 1,207,668 Library 13,141 - 0% - 13,141 627,629
Cemetery 121,734 5,665 5% 11,463 121,734 2,476,436
Yount 8,000 - 0% - - 805,179
Trust Funds 142,875 5,665 4% 11,463 134,875 3,909,244
Library / Poetry 101,677 40,080 39% 46,627 14,277 332,843 Museum 8,073 - 0% - 8,073 310,745
Public Safety 821,890 48,380 6% - (120,319) 404,779
Housing 48,956 9,290 19% 532 (107,927) 919,471
Streets 1,619,540 187,302 12% 39,584 (289,743) 1,304,923 Lighthouse 126,917 19,521 15% 23,164 (4,991) 225,791
Community Development/CDBG 41,957 2,464 6% 516 (241,444) 1,206,669 ARPA - - 0% - - 92,996
Downtown/Hospitality Districts 561,700 22,197 4% 28,455 - 57,737 Cable Franchise / Other 62,750 11,403 18% 66,919 (105,253) 156,473 Other Funds 3,393,460 340,637 10% 205,797 (847,327) 5,012,427 Totals All Funds $ 46,725,472 $ 3,103,080 7% $ 1,581,615 $ (2,967,667) $ 36,883,924 * Excludes Proposed Adjustments and Rollovers
Revenues Working Capital
5%
0%
15%
10%
4%
10%
7%
General Fund
Capital Funds
Enterprise Funds
Internal Service Funds
Trust Funds
Other Funds
Totals All Funds
Budgeted Revenues / YTD % of Budget - By Fund Type
PGCC 9-17-25
Fund
Main Fund - Fund 01
Other Funds Included
General Fund
Capital Projects
Capital Funds
Local Water Project
Cemetery
Sewer
Golf
Sewer Lateral Loans
Enterprise Funds
Employee Benefit
Worker's Compensation
Liability Insurance
Internal Service Funds
Library
Cemetery
Yount
Trust Funds
Library / Poetry
Museum
Public Safety
Housing
Streets
Lighthouse
Community Development/CDBG
ARPA
Downtown/Hospitality Districts
Cable Franchise / Other
Other Funds
Totals All Funds
Expenses by Fund - FY 2025-26 (Unaudited)
Through August 2025
Revised Budget YTD
YTD % of
Projected
Purchase
Orders
YTD %
with POs Prior YTD
$ 34,699,122 $ 5,308,747 15% 2,296,883 $ 22% $ 4,577,774 1,138,250 (6,073) -1% - -1% 10,807
35,837,372 5,302,674 15% 2,296,883 21% 4,588,581
$ 650,000 $ 19,187 3% $ - 3% $ -
650,000 19,187 3% - 3% -
1,025,105 93,890 9% 449,317 53% 194,614
848,109 107,821 13% 31,583 16% 79,172
3,945,269 229,361 6% 1,663,977 48% 191,257
1,026,682 296,097 29% 29,150 32% 139,117
- - 0% - 0% -
6,845,165 727,169 11% 2,174,027 42% 604,160
312,700 53,947 17% - 17% 106,277
916,948 360,223 39% - 39% 386,245
882,167 583,775 66% 5,446 67% 566,291
2,111,815 997,945 47% 5,446 48% 1,058,813
- - 0% - 0% -
- - 0% - 0% -
8,000 - 0% - 0% -
8,000 - 0% - 0% -
87,400 10,430 12% 18,264 33% 3,050
- 21,307 200% - 200% -
942,209 186,711 20% 347,851 57% 156,439
156,883 13,935 9% - 9% 19,190
1,909,283 69,911 4% 65,360 7% 29,326
131,908 14,502 11% - 11% 14,900
283,401 394,408 139% 39,000 153% 1,064
- - 0% - 0% -
561,700 - 0% - 0% -
168,003 - 0% - 0% 15
4,240,787 711,204 17% 470,475 28% 223,984
$ 49,693,139 $ 7,758,179 16% $ 4,946,831 26% $ 6,475,538 Expenses
15%
3%
11%
47%
0%
17%
16%
General Fund
Capital Funds
Enterprise Funds
Internal Service Funds
Trust Funds
Other Funds
Totals All Funds
Budgeted Expenses / YTD % of Budget By Fund Type
PGCC 9-17-25
General Fund Revenues - FY 2025-26 (Unaudited)
Through August 2025
Revenue Account Revised Budget YTD Revenues
YTD % of
Budget
Year End
Projection
Prior YTD
Revenues
Prior YTD %
of PY Budget
Property Taxes $ 11,022,700 $ 22,577 0% 11,022,700 0% - Sales Taxes 5,945,600 - 0% 5,945,600 - 0%
Business License/Cannabis Taxes 416,000 317,352 76% 416,000 148,896 21% Franchise Taxes 1,603,400 281,154 18% 1,603,400 - 0%
Utility User Taxes 2,183,500 223,149 10% 2,183,500 188,639 9% Transient Occupancy Tax 6,713,700 - 0% 6,713,700 43,517 1% Litter Abatement 210,000 52,731 25% 210,000 - 0%
Construction Permits 932,200 223,929 24% 932,200 145,912 12% Zoning Enforcement 206,000 72,456 35% 206,000 22,982 11% Plan Check Fees 606,700 110,028 18% 606,700 111,084 22% Parking Meters 351,200 2,392 1% 351,200 77,542 23%
Water Entitlements 287,600 - 0% 287,600 115,526 20%
Interest Earned 350,000 - 0% 350,000 - 0%
Investment Market Value Gain/Loss - - 0% - (129,332) -37% Indirect Cost Reimbursement 578,600 - 0% 578,600 - 0%
Total Major Revenues 31,407,200 1,305,768 4% 31,407,200 724,766 2% Total General Fund Revenues 33,757,010 1,543,750 5% 33,758,000 924,519 3% FY 2023-24 Tax Revenues Property Taxes Sales Taxes BL/Other Franchise Hotel Taxes Utility 10,135,764 5,975,031 697,772 1,635,968 6,730,240 2,118,068 0%
0%
76%
18%
10%
0%
0%
0%
21%
0%
9%
1%
Property Taxes - $11.0 million
Sales Taxes - $5.9 million
Business License/Cannabis Taxes - $0.4 million
Franchise Taxes - $1.6 million
Utility User Taxes - $2.2 million
Transient Occupancy Tax - $6.7 million
Budgeted Tax Revenues / YTD % of Budget - Current YTD vs Prior YTD 25-26 24-25
PGCC 9-17-25
Agenda No. 8 B
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Kimberly Shehorn, Accountant
MEETING DATE: September 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Fourth Quarter FY 24/25 Capital Project Report & Update CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
1. Receive the report.
2. Alternatively, discuss and take action related to this item.
DISCUSSION
The attached file provides information on the Adopted and Amended Budgets for each capital improvement project, as well as expenditures. The Project Budget column references projects that were approved in the prior fiscal years but were not completed by June 30, 2025, as well as new project budget adjustments that have been approved by the City Council. The status column references the current phase of the project, as of June 30, 2025.
Out of the 38 Capital Improvement Plan projects, 23 have been successfully completed as of the 4th quarter. An additional 10 projects are currently in the "Construction/Work in Progress Phase" and are showing significant progress.
As of June 30, 2025, approximately 94% of the General CIP Fund Projects are expensed through the end of the Fourth Quarter FY 24/25.
While the financial report shows that 73% of the total collective CIP budgeted funds have been expended, this figure does not fully reflect the true progress of the CIP program or the individual projects. This expenditure figure is influenced by a few large-scale multi-year projects. Despite significant progress, these multi-year projects are more complex due to their scale, with expenditures expected to ramp up over time as engineering and design phases advance and construction commences.
OPTIONS
N/A - This is informational only.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no financial impact associated with receiving this report.
PGCC 9-17-25
FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.
Attachments
Q4 CIP Full
PGCC 9-17-25
City of Pacific Grove
California Interim Capital Projects Report
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025
City of Pacific Grove
300 Forest Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
www.cityofpacificgrove.org
PGCC 9-17-25
The City’s capital improvement plan (CIP) is an integral part of the City’s annual budget process. The CIP serves as a public relations and economic development tool and focuses on preserving infrastructure while ensuring efficient use of public funds. Council Policy 400-6 defines a Capital Improvement or asset as buildings, machinery, or equipment, with an original cost more than $5,000 and a useful life of three years or more. Items listed within this section reference capital projects that are related to facilities, streets, and infrastructure.
The City prepares a capital improvement
plan to assist with the resiliency of public
assets. This includes the following
objectives:
Capital projects / equipment purchases
An implementation schedule
Options for project financing
Links to Council’s strategic initiatives
Budgetary information
Project justification
As part of the annual budget process, City departments submit project requests to the Public Works Department. Projects are identified based on input received from the community, the Mayor and City Council, as well as City staff. The Staff identifies projects that are based on critical needs, including those due to safety issues or to comply with new mandates. Each project proposal is reviewed from a variety of approaches and is prioritized based on the following criteria:
Greatest need
(e.g. mandates and public safety)
Meeting Council’s Priority Areas
Consequences of delay
(ex: potential to incur increased costs,
asset preservation)
Readiness
Opportunities to accomplish multiple
goals or align timing with another
project(s)
Availability of funding (ex: grants)
Under the direction of the City Manager, the Public Works and Finance Departments reviewed the proposed projects and prepared the CIP for submittal to the Mayor and City Council. The proposed CIP is then presented, discussed, and acted upon by the City Council in public sessions during the budget hearings.
City of Pacific Grove – Capital Project Overview
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Total - $12 million (With PY Carryovers) PGCC 9-17-25
Project Carryovers from Prior Fiscal Years
General Building Improvements
Point Pinos Coastal Trail (CIP 18-46)
This project involves constructing a 5-foot-wide decomposed granite pedestrian coastal trail seaward of Ocean View Blvd. along Point Pinos.
Point Pinos Lighthouse Roof Repair (CIP 23-05)
This project would allow for the installation of a new roof at the historic Point Pinos Lighthouse.
Museum Mezzanine Upgrades (CIP 23-07)
This project will improve the staircase and mezzanine at the Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History and bring the structure into compliance with current standards including rail spacing and heights.
Museum Basement Moisture Control (CIP 23-08)
This project will aim to address the moisture control issues via improvements to the sump pump and exploring methods for preventing moisture from seeping through the east side wall of the building.
Fire Station Roof Repair (CIP 23-10)
This project will repair portions of the fire station roof, adjacent to the apparatus bay and eastern stair well.
Fire Dept. Bathroom & Shower Remodel (CIP 23-12)
This project will provide separation in the dorm side bathroom for male and female facilities; additionally, the project would entail replacement of appliances that are over twenty years old and are extremely worn.
Sewer System Improvements
Phase 9 Sewer Improvements (CIP 22-03)
This project will allow the City to make vital sewer infrastructure improvements. Segments for repair were identified based on videoing of the lines and maintenance logs. Original repair locations Included: Bently, Railroad Way, Areas between Sunset Ave and Asilomar Ave by Forest Ave and Del Monte Park.
Pump Station Replacement (CIP 23-06)
This project would allow for a full replacement of lift station 15.5, located at Crespi Pond. Per the 2021 Pump Station Condition Assessment, lift station 15.5 is in the worst condition of the City’s seven lift stations.
Priority Stormwater Repair Project on Syida Drive (24-03) The 12" corrugated steel stormwater pipe has deteriorated and resulted in several large sinkholes throughout the pipe segment that runs along the property line of 4 properties (Benito Court to Syida Dr). The scope of work includes installation of a fiberglass lining and installation of three stormwater access points.
Sewer Collection System Master Plan Projects 1 ,6 & 9 (CIP 24-04) The Sewer Collection System Master Plan (SCSMP) identifies CIP projects and necessary upgrades to the collection system. Over the years the City has completed 6 of the 9 SCSMP near term CIP Projects. This multiyear project will allow the City to commence the remaining three (3) near term projects 1, 6 & 9.
City of Pacific Grove
Capital Project (CIP) Descriptions
PGCC 9-17-25
Project Carryovers from Prior Fiscal Years (Continued)
Park, Open Space Improvements
Backstop Replacement Municipal Ball Park (CIP 22-13)
This project would facilitate a full replacement of the backstop at the Municipal Ball Park located at 230 17 Mile Drive. The existing backstop has significantly deteriorated and needs replacement.
Recreation Board's Park Inventory (CIP 23-22)
The Planning Commission supports the Recreation Board's inventory of improvements to park facilities.
This project will allow for the implementation of some of the improvements noted in the park inventory.
Street, Sidewalk Improvements
Cedar, Sunset, & Congress Intersection (CIP23-03)
This multi-year project would allow for the design, permitting, environmental review, and construction of safety and multi-modal improvements at the Cedar, Sunset, and Congress intersection. This project was identified via the Highway 68 Corridor Study conducted in conjunction with the Transportation Agency of Monterey County (TAMC).
David Ave Street Rehabilitation (CIP 23-04)
This project will address David Ave from Divisadero Avenue to Forest Avenue. This segment of roadway is currently in "poor " condition with a Pavement Condition Index rating of 48.
Safety Lighting at Robert Down Elementary (CIP 23-16)
This project would allow for the installation of "Wig-Wag" lights to be added to both crosswalks in front of Robert Down School. The lights would be like those located adjacent to the Lovers Point Coastal Access Project at the corner of Ocean View Blvd and Forest Ave.
David Ave Sidewalk (CIP 23-21)
This multi-year project would entail engineering, design and construction of an ADA compliant sidewalk on David Avenue between Patterson Lane and Montecito Ave.
FY 23/24 Street Rehabilitation Project (CIP 24-01)
This project will address the aging road infrastructure network, increase the PCI on five road segments that are in "failed" condition, address underground aging infrastructure, and ensure the City meets Maintenance of Effort (MOE) requirements. This project will address these "failed" segments of roadway:
(1) Locust St, Sinex Ave to Junipero Ave (PCI 3) (2) Willow St, Sinex Av e to Junipero Ave (PCI 7) (3) Wood St, Sinex Ave to Junipero Ave (PCI 19) (4) Grand Ave, Sinex Ave to Junipero Ave (PCI 10) (5) Pearl St, 8th St to Monterey Ave (PCI 0)
FY 23/24 Crack & Slurry Seal Project (CIP 24-02)
Crack and Slurry sealing helps preserve the City's roads against rapid deterioration and potholes due to inclement weather. This is a cost effective maintenance treatment that helps ensure roads remain in good condition for years to come. Streets to receive the crack & slurry seal treatment are identified via the City's Pavement Management Program, maintenance logs, and in-field observations.
Design of Sidewalk Extension for Outside Dining Uses (CIP 24-06) The curb and sidewalk on the south side of Lighthouse Ave on the eastbound approach to Fountain Ave is to be extended ten feet into the parking area, which had a parklet for outdoor dining.
PGCC 9-17-25
New Capital Projects for Fiscal Year 2024-25
General Building Improvements
PG Museum Flooring Replacement (CIP 25-05)
The project will replace the deteriorated carpet at the Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History.
Museum Roof Repair - Storage Garage (CIP 25-06)
This project rectifies the leaking roof above the storage garage at the Museum of Natural History
Point Pinos Lighthouse Electrical Panel (CIP 25-07)
This project splits the Point Pinos Lighthouse property's electrical circuits from the US Coast Guard’s meter.
Golf Course Water Heater (CIP 25-08)
This project installs a new water heater to ensure a dedicated hot water supply for the leased restaurant.
Library Door Repair (CIP 25-09)
The projects involve installing a new automatic belt drive door, featuring 1/4" clear tempered glass.
Recreation Trail Improvements - Esplanade Park (CIP 25-10) This multi-year project addresses needed improvements on the Recreation Trail at this specific location.
Sewer System Improvements
Community Center Sewer Repairs (CIP 25-04)
The current cast iron sewer lateral line has deteriorated, resulting in reduced functionality and susceptibility to blockages due to its degraded condition. Replacement of the lateral line from the sewer main connection on Junipero to the facility is imperative to maintain uninterrupted operation of public restrooms and sinks.
Park, Open Space Improvements
Pico Ave & Crocker Ave Stormwater Improvements (CIP 25-11) This project involves installing approximately 120 feet of rolled berm and adding a new drain inlet to connect to the underground storm drain system. This is necessary to address flooding and pooling water issues during rain events in the area.
Street, Sidewalk Improvements
FY 24/25 Street Rehabilitation Project (CIP 25-01)
This project aims to improve the aging road infrastructure network by enhancing the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) on two road segments currently in poor condition, addressing aging underground infrastructure, and ensuring compliance with Maintenance of Effort (MOE) requirements.
FY 24/25 Crack & Slurry Seal Project (CIP 25-02)
Crack and Slurry sealing is a vital maintenance activity that helps preserve the City's roads against rapid deterioration and potholes due to inclement weather. This is a cost effective maintenance treatment that helps ensure roads remain in good condition for years to come. Streets to receive crack & slurry seal treatment are identified via the City's Pavement Management Program, maintenance logs, and in-field observations.
Pedestrian Safety - Central Ave & Fountain Ave (CIP 25-03) The project will reconfigure the intersection of Central Ave & Fountain Ave to provide an All-Way Stop intersection, as identified in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Pacific Grove Hotel. The Applicant shall pay 25% of the cost for design and construction of the reconfiguration of the intersection to accommodate a new raised pavement crosswalk across the intersection on the south side of Central Ave.
PGCC 9-17-25
Capital Improvement Project Budget Report
4th Quarter - Fiscal Year 2024-25
Project Project Name Status of Project Estimated Completion Fund No. Acct Fund Name Project Budget Project LTD Expenses PO Balances Remaining Balance % of Budget Street, Sidewalk Improvements (Object 6041)
CIP23-03 Cedar, Sunset, & Congress Intersection Work in Progress FY 24-25 20 6041 RSTP (TAMC) 1,000,000 $ 451,046 $ 352,711 $ 196,243 $ 80% CIP23-04 David Ave Street Rehabilitation Work in Progress FY 24-25 17 6041 Local Streets and Roads 266,157 120,434 1 145,722 45% 76 6041 Sewer 156,000 - 156,000 - 0%
422,157 120,434 301,722 1 29%
CIP23-16 Safety Lighting at Robert Down Elementary Complete FY 24-25 84 6041 ARPA 4,710 4,710 - 100% - CIP23-21 David Ave Sidewalk Complete FY 24-25 84 6041 ARPA 662,378 662,494 - (116) 100% CIP24-01 FY23/24 Street Rehabilitation Project Complete FY 24-25 17 6041 Local Streets and Roads 536,088 482,656 52,913 520 90% 47 6041 RMRA SB1 505,049 318,517 186,533 - 63%
63 6041 Capital Improvement 300,000 300,000 - 100% -
76 6051 Sewer 872,000 749,743 122,258 - 86%
2,213,137 1,850,915 361,703 520 84%
CIP24-02 FY23/24 Crack & Slurry Seal Project Complete FY 24-25 17 6041 Local Streets and Roads 185,000 185,000 - 100% 0 63 6041 Capital Improvement 200,000 200,000 - 100% -84 6041 ARPA 15,290 14,400 - 94% 890 400,290 399,400 - 100% 890
CIP24-06 Design of Sidewalk Extension for Outside Dining Uses Complete FY 24-25 63 6041 Capital Improvement 50,000 48,264 - 97% 1,736 CIP25-01 FY 24/25 Street Rehabilitation Project Work in Progress FY 25-26 63 6041 Capital Improvement 300,000 93,407 4,666 201,927 33% 17 6041 Local Streets and Roads 730,000 - 730,000 - 0%
47 6054 RMRA SB1 386,065 - 386,065 - 0%
76 6051 Sewer 300,000 15,556 284,445 - 5%
1,716,065 108,963 1,602,436 4,666 7%
CIP25-02 FY 24/25 Crack & Slurry Seal Project Work in Progress FY 24-25 17 6041 Local Streets and Roads 200,000 5,567 194,434 - 3% 63 6041 Capital Improvement 200,000 - 200,000 - 0%
400,000 5,567 394,434 - 1%
CIP25-03 Pedestrian Safety - Central Ave & Fountain Ave Work in Progress FY 24-25 63 6041 Capital Improvement 270,000 53,234 216,526 240 20% CIP25-14 Sidewalk Ext at Lighthouse & Fountain Complete FY 24-25 63 6041 Capital Improvement 340,000 265,424 46,688 92% 27,888CIP25-15 Sidewalk Projects at Sinex & Sunset Work in Progress FY 24-25 63 6041 Capital Improvement 175,000 37,429 137,571 - 21% Streets $ 7,653,737 $ 4,007,879 $ 404,826 $ 3,241,033 58% PGCC 9-17-25
Capital Improvement Project Budget Report
4th Quarter - Fiscal Year 2024-25
Project Project Name Status of Project Estimated Completion Fund No. Acct Fund Name Project Budget Project LTD Expenses PO Balances Remaining Balance % of Budget Park, Open Space Improvements (Object 6031)
CIP22-13 Backstop Replacement Municipal Ball Park Complete FY 24-25 84 6041 ARPA 25,736 25,736 - 100% - 92 6031 McIndoo Donation 17,529 17,529 - 100% -
93 6031 Koo Estate Donation 7,000 5,973 - 85% 1,027
63 6031 Capital Improvement 96,000 90,681 - 94% 5,319
146,265 139,919 - 96% 6,346
CIP22-21 GW Park Playground & ADA Compliant Playground Complete FY 24-25 63 6031 Capital Improvement 81,952 81,853 - 100% 99 84 6031 ARPA 25,000 25,000 - 100% -
106,952 106,853 - 100% 99
CIP23-22 Recreation Board's Park Inventory Complete FY 24-25 84 6031 ARPA 25,071 25,071 - 100% - CIP24-05 George Washington Park (GWP) Enhancement Project Complete FY 24-25 63 6031 Capital Improvement 50,000 17,656 - 32,344 35% CIP25-11 Pico Ave & Crocker Ave Stormwater Improvements Complete FY 24-25 46 6031 Strong Disbursement 45,000 41,371 - 92% 3,629 CIP25-16 Butterfly Sanctuary Fencing Complete FY 24-25 63 6031 Capital Improvement 75,000 - - 75,000 0%CIP25-17 GW Park Ball Field Drainage Complete FY 24-25 63 6031 Capital Improvement 50,000 22,065 - 27,935 44% CIP25-18 Pickleball/Tennis Court Resurfacing & Sound Fencing Contract FY 24-25 63 6031 Capital Improvement 47,000 24,214 - 22,786 52% CIP25-19 ADA Access at GW Park Project Development FY 24-25 63 6031 Capital Improvement 25,000 - - 25,000 0% Parks/Open Space $ 570,288 $ 377,149 193,140 - 66%
General Building Improvements (Object 6021)
CIP18-46 Tide Pool & Point Pinos Complete FY 24-25 63 6021 Capital Improvement 2,875,205 $ $ 2,873,911 -$ $ 100% 1,294 CIP23-05 Point Pinos Lighthouse Roof Repair Work in Progress FY 24-25 27 6021 Lighthouse 60,000 4,025 - 55,975 7% CIP23-07 Museum Mezzanine Upgrades Complete FY 24-25 08 6021 Museum Improvement 75,000 33,768 5,065 52% 36,166 CIP23-08 Museum Basement Moisture Control Complete FY 24-25 08 6021 Museum Improvement 40,000 26,241 - 13,759 66% CIP23-10 Fire Station Roof Repair Complete FY 24-25 84 6021 ARPA 59,476 59,476 - 100% - CIP23-12 Fire Dept. Bathroom & Shower Remodel Complete FY 24-25 84 6021 ARPA 152,277 145,360 - 95% 6,917 CIP25-05 PG Museum Flooring Replacement Bids/RFP FY 24-25 08 6021 Museum Improvement 35,000 - - 35,000 0%CIP25-06 Museum Roof Repair - Storage Garage Project Development FY 24-25 08 6021 Museum Improvement 17,000 - - 17,000 0%CIP25-07 Point Pinos Lighthouse Electrical Panel Complete FY 24-25 27 6021 Lighthouse 20,000 3,810 - 16,190 19% CIP25-08 Golf Course Water Heater Complete FY 24-25 77 6021 Golf 20,000 16,850 - 84% 3,150 CIP25-09 Library Door Repair Complete FY 24-25 84 6021 ARPA 22,000 20,672 - 94% 1,328 CIP25-10 Recreation Trail Improvements - Esplanade Park Work in Progress FY 25-26 46 6021 Strong Disbursement 20,000 6,812 - 13,188 34% Building $ 3,395,958 $ 3,190,925 $ 5,065 199,967 94%
PGCC 9-17-25
Capital Improvement Project Budget Report
4th Quarter - Fiscal Year 2024-25
Project Project Name Status of Project Estimated Completion Fund No. Acct Fund Name Project Budget Project LTD Expenses PO Balances Remaining Balance % of Budget Sewer System Improvements (Object 6051)
CIP22-03 Phase 9 Sewer Improvements Complete FY 24-25 76 6051 Sewer $ 997,387 $ 901,588 $ 12,822 $ 92% 82,977 CIP23-06 Pump Station Replacement Bids/RFP FY 24-25 76 6051 Sewer 337,095 87,096 22,241 227,758 32% CIP24-03 Priority Stormwater Repair Project on Syida Dr Work in Progress FY 24-25 63 6054 Capital Improvement 100,000 4,077 - 95,923 4% CIP24-04 Sewer Collection System Master Plan Projects 1,6 & 9 Work in Progress FY 24-25 76 6051 Sewer 1,800,000 183,953 1,591,066 99% 24,981 CIP25-04 Community Center Sewer Repairs Complete FY 24-25 76 6051 Sewer 50,000 32,246 - 17,754 64% Sewer 3,284,482 1,208,960 1,626,129 449,393 86%
Grand Totals $ 14,904,465 $ 8,784,913 $ 2,036,020 $ 4,083,532 73% Fund No. Fund Name % of Budget Spent Budget YTD Exps PO Balance Balance % Budget 8 Museum Improvement 36% 39% 36% 167,000 60,009 5,065 101,925 39% 17 Local Streets and Roads 41% 41% 41% 1,917,245 793,656 1,123,069 520 41% 20 RSTP (TAMC) 45% 80% 45% 1,000,000 451,046 352,711 196,243 80%27 Lighthouse 10% 10% 10% 80,000 7,835 - 72,165 10% 46 Strong Disbursement 74% 74% 74% 65,000 48,183 - 16,817 74% 47 RMRA SB1 36% 36% 36% 891,114 318,517 572,598 - 36%
63 Capital Improvement 79% 80% 79% 5,235,157 4,112,214 51,595 1,071,348 80% 76 Sewer 44% 80% 44% 4,512,482 1,970,181 1,626,129 916,172 80% 77 Golf 84% 84% 84% 20,000 16,850 - 84% 3,150
84 ARPA 99% 99% 99% 991,938 982,919 - 99% 9,019
92 McIndoo Donation 100% 100% 100% 17,529 17,529 - 100% - 93 Koo Estate Donation 85% 85% 85% 7,000 5,973 - 85% 1,027 59% 73% 59% 14,904,465 8,784,913 2,036,020 4,083,532 73% Project Count 38% of Projects with a Status of % of Total % of Total Project Development 2 5%Complete 23 61%
Work in Progress 10 26%
Bids/RFP 2 5%Contract 1 3%
38 100%
39%
41%
80%
10%
74%
36%
80%
80%
84%
99%
100%
85%
Museum Improvement
Local Streets and Roads
RSTP (TAMC)
Lighthouse
Strong Disbursement
RMRA SB1
Capital Improvement
Sewer
Golf
ARPA
McIndoo Donation
Koo Estate Donation
% of Budget by Fund
5%
61%
26%
5%
3%
Project…
Complete
Work in Progress
Bids/RFP
Contract
% of Projects With a Status of
58%
66%
94%86%
73%
Streets
Parks/Open Space
Building
Sewer
Grand Totals
% of Budget by Project Category
PGCC 9-17-25
Agenda No. 8 C
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Kim Shehorn, Accountant
MEETING DATE: September 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Fourth Quarter Treasurer’s Quarterly Report
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
1. Receive the report.
2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
DISCUSSION
Article 19, Section (K) of the City Charter requires that a quarterly statement of all funds in the treasury be submitted to the Council. The Treasurer’s report allows the Council and public to verify that the City’s funds are invested in a safe and prudent manner, and that such investments comply with City policy and state law. The Treasurer’s Report is different from a budget report, as its purpose is to report on cash balances.
This report reflects the City’s balances as of June 30, 2025 and shows that cash and investments were held citywide, with a market value of $36.7 million. The average yield on the City’s portfolio for the quarter is 3.68%. This represents a yield rate that is 0.20% more than the prior quarter and 0.42% more than the same quarter of the prior year. All investments are in government securities, certificates of deposit (CD), or other approved investment vehicles. The maturity dates are laddered, to ensure liquidity. Investments that have matured will be reinvested according to the cities' applicable policies. All bank balances are insured. The City does not actively trade either certificates of deposits or federal agency securities but holds investments in the portfolio for maturity. The table below shows the activity for the quarter.
Date Description Rate Dollar Amt./ Face
Value Activity
1/31/2025 Manufacturers &
Traders 4.50% $244,000 Matured
1/31/2025 Merrick Bk South 4.50% $249,000 Matured
2/18/2025 First Tech FED CR 4.85% $249,000 Matured
PGCC 9-17-25
4/24/2025 Flagstar BK Hicksville 5.25% $243,000 Matured 6/7/2025 Discover
Bnk Greenwood 4.90% $249,000 Matured
OPTIONS
N/A – This is an informational report.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact. This is informational only.
FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.
Attachments
Treasurers Report Q4 FY24-25
PGCC 9-17-25
City of Pacific Grove
California Interim Investment Report
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025
City of Pacific Grove
300 Forest Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
www.cityofpacificgrove.org
PGCC 9-17-25
Matthew Mogensen
City Manager
Table of Contents
Investment Compliance Report .......................... 3 LAIF Pool Background ......................................... 4 Economic Trends ................................................ 5 Investment Summary and Details ....................... 6 Long Term Investment Restrictions
Only debt reserve funds may be invested in
securities exceeding five years without prior
Council approval, so long as their maturities
coincide with the expected use of funds.
Liquidity Objectives
The City’s investments will remain liquid to enable
it to meet all operating requirements which might
be reasonably anticipated. Maturities of some
investments for which there is limited opportunity
for resale shall be staggered to maximize liquidity.
Safety Objectives
The City’s investments shall be overseen in a
manner to ensure preservation of capital in the
portfolio. The City will diversify its funds among
a variety of securities with varying maturities.
Additional Resources for Information
Website: cityofpacificgrove.org
Facebook: CityofPacificGrove
X/Twitter: @PacificGrove
The City of Pacific Grove
presents its investment report
for the current fiscal year,
including details on types of
securities held and maturities
of its investments, as well as
reporting on compliance with
the City’s investment policy
and recent market conditions.
Cash Overview
The City pools its cash for investment purposes.
Highly liquid market investments with maturities
of one year or less at time of purchase are stated
at amortized cost. All other investments are stated
at fair value. Certain restricted funds, held by
outside firms through agreements with the City,
are not pooled and reported as restricted cash.
Investment Reporting Standards
The City reports its investments in accordance
with its investment policy, which has been
adopted by the Council. The policy is designed
to meet the standards of the Government
Finance Officers Association (GFOA), California
Municipal Treasurer’s Association (CMTA)
California Debt and Investment Advisory
Committee (CDIAC) and the Association of
Professional Treasurers of the United States and
Canada (APTUSC).
Yield Objectives
The objective is to attain a established benchmark
or an acceptable rate of return commensurate
with the City’s risk constraints identified in its
investment policy and its cash flow requirements.
Welcome Message
From the
City Manager
City of Pacific Grove
Investment Report
Fiscal Year 2024-25
PGCC 9-17-25
Overview of Investment Policy
The following provides a summary of the City’s investment policy, which provides guidelines that City staff follow in placing investments. Investments of bond proceeds are governed by the debt issue covenants. Per the City investment policy, any investments temporarily in non-compliance will be addressed in subsequent months. The City is projected to have sufficient funds to meet its expenses for the next six months.
Investment Type
Maximum % or $ of Portfolio
Or In One Issuer
Minimum
Required
Rating
Maximum
Maturity
Agency in
Compliance?
Demand Deposits None None 5 years Yes
U.S. Treasuries None N/A 5 years Yes
U.S. Agencies None N/A 5 years Yes
Joint Powers Agency
Pool
100% - CAMP/CalTrust None N/A N/A
Money Market Funds 20% AAA N/A No
Bankers Acceptances 40% (10% with one institution) A1/P1 180 days None Held Commercial Paper 25% (10% with one firm) A1/P1 270 days None Held Placement Service /
Negotiable CDs
50% /
30% (10% with one bank)
A1 < 1 year
A for 1-5 years
5 years Yes
LAIF Per State Statute
$75 million per account
N/A N/A Yes
State / Local Agency
Debt Issues
None AA (except City
bonds)
5 years None Held
County Pool 100% None N/A None Held
City of Pacific Grove, California
Investment Disclosures and Compliance Review
PGCC 9-17-25
Overview of Investment Policy (Continued)
Additional information on the investments allowed under the City’s investment policy is provided below, as described in the footnotes to the City’s annual financial report:
• Certificates of Deposit - Non-Negotiable Certificates of Deposits will be made only in FDIC or FSLIC insured accounts. For deposits in excess of the insured maximum of $250,000, approved collateral shall be required in accordance with Government Code 53652 and/or 53651 (m) (1). Investment in these instruments shall be limited to financial institutions that, in the Treasurer’s judgement, are of high quality, and shall not have a term exceeding five years from the date of purchase.
• Securities of the U.S. Government or its Agencies - Includes obligations issued by Federal Home Loan Banks, Government National Mortgage Association, Farm Credit System, the Federal Home Loan Bank, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association, Federal National Mortgage Association, or obligations or other instruments of or issued by a federal agency or a United States Government sponsored enterprise. • Treasury Bills and Notes - U.S. Treasury Bills, Notes, Bonds, or Certificates of Indebtedness, or those for which the full faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest. • Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) - Investment of funds in the California LAIF which allows the State Treasurer to invest through the Pooled Money Investment Account (PMIA). Maximum investment is subject to state regulation. LAIF determines fair value on its investment portfolio based on market quotations for those securities where market quotations are readily available and based on amortized cost or best estimate for those securities where market value is not readily available. LAIF is reported at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
Custodial Credit Risk
For an investment, custodial credit risk is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterparty, the City will not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The California Government Code and the City's investment policy do not contain legal or policy requirements that would limit the exposure to custodial credit risk for investments. With respect to investments, custodial credit risk generally applies only to direct investments in marketable securities. Custodial credit risk does not apply to a local government's indirect investment in securities through the use of mutual funds or government investment pools (such as LAIF).
Fair Value of Investments
The three levels of the fair value measurement hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 – Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for assets liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.
Level 2 – Inputs, observable for the assets through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs reflecting the City’s best estimate of market pricing at the measurement date.
Federal Agency Securities and corporate bonds categorized as Level 2 are valued based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuations for which all significant assumptions are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
PGCC 9-17-25
July 4.258
June 4.269
May 4.272
April 4.281
March 4.313
February 4.333
LAIF Apportionment Rate(2): 4.40
LAIF Earnings Ratio(2): 0.00012059828906715
LAIF Administrative Cost(1)*: 0.18
PMIA Average Life(1): 248
LAIF Fair Value Factor(1): 1.001198310
PMIA Daily(1): 4.26
PMIA Quarter to Date(1): 4.27
Treasuries
51.92%
Agencies
28.21%
Certificates of
Deposit/Bank Notes
9.47%
Time
Deposits
3.09%
Commercial
Paper
6.58%
Corporate
Bonds
0.58%
Loans
0.15%
Notes: The apportionment rate includes interest earned on the CalPERS Supplemental Pension Payment pursuant to Government Code 20825 (c)(1) .
*The percentage of administrative cost equals the total administrative cost divided by the quarterly interest earnings. The law provides that administrative costs are not to exceed 5% of quarterly EARNINGS of the fund. However, if the 13-week Daily Treasury Bill Rate on the last day of the fiscal year is below 1%, then administrative costs shall not exceed 8% of quarterly EARNINGS of the fund for the subsequent fiscal year.
Source:
(1) State of California, Office of the Treasurer
(2) State of California, Office of the Controller
PMIA Average Monthly
Effective Yields(1)
PMIA/LAIF Performance Report
as of 08/20/25
Daily rates are now available here. View PMIA Daily Rates Quarterly Performance
Quarter Ended 6/30/25
Chart does not include $1,037,000.00 in mortgages, which equates to 0.001%. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.
Pooled Money Investment Account
Monthly Portfolio Composition (1)
7/31/25
$171.6 billion
PGCC 9-17-25
Monthly Market Review
Information provided by CAMP’s Program Administrator PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
CAMP® is a registered trademark and the CAMP logos and designs are trademarks owned by the California Asset Management Trust (Trust). This information is for institutional investor use only, not for further distribution to retail investors, and does not represent an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any fund or other security. Investors should consider the Trust’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses before investing in the Trust. This and other information about the Trust is available in the Trust’s current Information Statement, which should be read carefully before investing. A copy of the Trust’s Information Statement may be obtained by calling 1-800-729-7665 or is available on the Trust’s website at www.camponline.com. While the Cash Reserve Portfolio seeks to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share and the CAMP Term Portfolio seeks to achieve a net asset value of $1.00 per share at the stated maturity, it is possible to lose money investing in the Trust. An investment in the Trust is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Shares of the Trust are distributed by U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc., member FINRA (www.finra.org) and SIPC (www.sipc.org). PFM Asset Management is a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc., which serves as administrator and investment adviser to the Trust. U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. is a direct subsidiary of U.S. Bank N.A. and an indirect subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. is a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp and affiliate of U.S. Bank N.A.
Next stop, September.
Economic Highlights
• As expected, the Federal Reserve (Fed) kept the target range for the overnight rate unchanged at 4.25% to 4.50% for the fifth consecutive time following the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting on July 30. Notably, Governors Waller and Bowman both dissented, arguing instead for a 25-basis point (bp) rate cut.
• During the press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell continued to emphasize the importance of making sure the effects of tariffs are short-lived and do not spark a broader reflationary event elsewhere in the economy. He also noted the importance of the incoming data as the Fed attempts to balance downside risks to the labor market and inflation, which remains above its target. • Trade deals with several key trading partners including Japan and the European Union were announced in advance of the August 1 deadline. President Trump has maintained a floor of 10% for the reciprocal tariff baseline, with expectations of the average effective tariff rate to be around 15%. Tariff negotiations remain a focus, though the market impact has notably diminished relative to earlier in the year.
• The tax and reconciliation bill was signed into law in early July. Significant longer-term budget concerns remain as the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates the bill will add $3.4 trillion to the U.S. deficit over the next decade.
• The Consumer Price Index (CPI) increased to 2.7% on a year-overyear basis. Goods inflation, particularly in import-reliant subcategories such as household furnishings and recreation, are beginning to show evidence of upward price pressures. The full effect of tariffs have not been felt but are expected to materialize over the coming months.
• The first read of the second quarter GDP showed strong headline growth at 3.0%, mainly due to a sharp reversal in the trade which dragged down Q1 GDP. The headline figure masked underlying softness in demand and consumer spending.
• The July jobs report surprised to the downside with 73,000 new jobs created, and the unemployment rate rose to 4.2%. While the July jobs report was weaker than expected, the prior two months garnered greater attention with downside revisions of 258,000 less jobs in May and June versus previously reported figures. Following the report, the 2-yr Treasury was down 22 bps, and futures priced in an 83% chance for a 25-bp cut in September.
Bond Markets
• Yields on 3-month, 2-year, and 10-year U.S. Treasuries ended July at 4.34%, 3.96%, and 4.37%, representing increases of +4 bps, +24 bps, and +14 bps, respectively. The steepness of the yield curve as measured by the yield difference between 2- and 10-year maturities has now remained near 50 bps for three straight months despite interest rate volatility.
• Fixed income indices produced mixed returns for the month, as the short end of the curve outperformed longer tenors. The ICE BofA 3-month, 2-year, and 10-year U.S. Treasury indices returned +0.35%, -0.13%, and -0.67%, respectively.
Equity Markets
• Equities continued to rally and ended the month at new all-time highs. The S&P 500 Index is now up +7.6% year-to-date. For the month of July, the NASDAQ returned +3.7%, the S&P 500 Index +2.2%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average just +0.1%. • International equities, as measured by the MSCI ACWI ex U.S. Net Index, returned +0.4% for the month while the U.S. Dollar Index rallied from 3-year lows, and was up 3.3% for the month.
PFMAM Strategy Recap
• We expect to maintain portfolio durations at or slightly above 100% of benchmarks given the ongoing rate and policy uncertainty. We also maintain a curve steepening bias.
• Spreads on federal agencies and supranationals remain quite narrow. We do not anticipate any material changes to spreads or new issuance in the near-term and will continue to maintain low allocations in favor of other sectors. While no significant impact is expected over the foreseeable future, we will closely monitor progress around privatization efforts of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. • Investment-grade (IG) corporate bond spreads narrowed in July, continuing the significant retracement following spread widening around Liberation Day. Risk-on sentiment remains strong as the economic outlook supports corporate fundamentals. Additionally, corporate bond technicals remain extremely strong given attractive overall yields and low net issuance. The strong pace of overall new issuance continues to create opportunities to selectively add allocations.
• Asset-backed securities (ABS) also narrowed over the month but seem to have stabilized for the short term. Credit metrics and consumer fundamentals remain strong while credit enhancements are robust. We expect spreads to remain volatile with a bias towards spread widening. New issuance continues to be met with robust demand, but supply forecasts have been revised downward from the start of the year.
• Agency-backed commercial MBS (CMBS) and Mortgage-backed securities (MBS) both posted positive excess returns in July. Longer-duration collateral (30-year mortgages) notably outperformed shorter-duration collateral (15-year mortgages). Waning bond volatility supported performance in mortgage-related sectors; however, we remain cautious as we expect heightened uncertainty to weigh on the sector over the near term.
• We expect the debt ceiling increase to put upward pressure on short-term Treasury yields as the Treasury increases issuance to replenish its cash account. This new issuance has generally been met with strong demand. Meanwhile, credit spreads on the short end of the curve have stabilized during the month, allowing selective attractive adds across tenors.
Fixed Income | August 2025
PGCC 9-17-25
PFM Asset Management is a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. | For Institutional Investor or Investment Professional Use Only This material is not for inspection by, distribution to, or quotation to the general public.
Indices shown are not available for investment. The index data reference herein is the property of the index provider and/or its licensors. The index provider assumes no liability in connections with its use and does not sponsor, endorse or recommend the products or services contained herein. Index returns do not reflect payment of any sales charges or fees an investor would pay to purchase the securities they represent. The imposition of these fees and charges would cause investment performance to be lower than the performance shown.
The views expressed within this material constitute the perspective and judgment of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. at the time of distribution and are subject to change. Any forecast, projection, or prediction of the market, the economy, economic trends, and equity or fixed-income markets are based upon current opinion as of the date of issue and are also subject to change.
Opinions and data presented are not necessarily indicative of future events or expected performance. Information contained herein is based on data obtained from recognized statistical services, issuer reports or communications, or other sources, believed to be reliable. No representation is made as to its accuracy or completeness.
NOT FDIC INSURED : NO BANK GUARANTEE : MAY LOSE VALUE
Spot Prices and Benchmark Rates
Index Jul 31, 2024 Jun 30,
2025 Jul 31, 2025 Monthly Change
1-Month SOFR 5.34% 4.32% 4.35% 0.03%
3-Month SOFR 5.24% 4.29% 4.30% 0.01%
Effective Fed Funds Rate 5.33% 4.33% 4.33% 0.00%
Fed Funds Target Rate 5.50% 4.50% 4.50% 0.00%
Gold ($/oz) $2,427 $3,308 $3,293 -$15
Crude Oil ($/Barrel) $77.91 $65.11 $69.26 $4.15
U.S. Dollars per Euro $1.08 $1.18 $1.14 -$0.04
U.S. Treasury Yields
Maturity Jul 31, 2024 Jun 30,
2025 Jul 31, 2025 Monthly Change
3-Month 5.29% 4.30% 4.34% 0.04%
6-Month 5.09% 4.25% 4.28% 0.03%
2-Year 4.26% 3.72% 3.96% 0.24%
5-Year 3.91% 3.80% 3.97% 0.17%
10-Year 4.03% 4.23% 4.37% 0.14%
30-Year 4.30% 4.78% 4.90% 0.12%
Yields by Sector and Maturity
Maturity U.S.
Treasury
Federal
Agency
CorporatesAA-A IndustrialsAAA
Municipals
3-Month 4.34% 4.35% 4.48% -
6-Month 4.28% 4.28% 4.52% -
2-Year 3.96% 3.97% 4.29% 2.44%
5-Year 3.97% 3.98% 4.50% 2.63%
10-Year 4.38% 4.44% 4.99% 3.46%
30-Year 4.90% - 5.71% 4.46%
Economic Indicators
Indicator Release
Date Period Actual Survey (Median)
Retail Sales Advance MoM 17-Jul Jun 0.60% 0.10%
FOMC Rate Decision 30-Jul Jul 4.50% 4.50%
GDP Annualized QoQ 30-Jul 2Q A 3.00% 2.50%
U. of Mich. Consumer Sentiment 31-Jul Jul F 61.7 61.8
PCE YoY 1-Aug Jun 2.60% 2.40%
ISM Manufacturing 1-Aug Jul 48 49.5
Change in Non-farm Payrolls 1-Aug Jul 83K 100K
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
5.5%
U.S. Treasury Yield Curve
7/31/2024
6/30/2025
7/31/2025
3-mo 2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 30-yr
-0.15%
0.02% 0.10%
0.64%
-0.09%
4.37% 4.56%
5.53%
3.88%
5.27%
1-5 Year Treasury 1-5 Year Agency 1-5 Year AAA-A
Corp
1-5 Year
Municipals
0-5 Year MBS
ICE BofA Fixed Income Index Returns
July Prior 12 Months
-0.4%
2.2% 1.7%
-1.4%
2.5%
16.3%
-0.6%
12.8%
ICE BofA U.S. Treasury
Master Index
S&P 500 Russell 2000
(Small Cap)
MSCI EAFE
(Developed
Europe/Asia)
Total Return of Major Indices
July Prior 12 Months
4.0%
4.2%
4.4%
4.6%
4.8%
5.0%
5.2%
5.4%
5.6%
Jul '24 Oct '24 Jan '25 Apr '25 Jul '25
30-Day Money Market Yields
Commercial Paper (A1/P1) Federal Agency U.S. T-Bill
Source: Bloomberg. Data as of July 31, 2025, unless otherwise noted.
PGCC 9-17-25
% of % Book Market
Institution Category Rating Total Yield Value Value
Cash Deposits
Petty Cash 0.02% 0.00% 685 685
Bank of America Checking 100% 0.00% 2,749,924 2,749,924 Total Cash Deposits 100% 0.00% 2,750,609 2,750,609
Investments - Yount Trust
Money Market Uncategorized Not Rated 0% 3.94% 168 168
Fixed Income Uncategorized Not Rated 24% 0.50% 205,000 200,843 U.S. Government Bonds Level 2 AA/AAA 76% 2.08% 638,000 629,700 Total Investments - Yount Trust 100% 1.69% 843,168 830,711 Investments - Other City Wide
State Local Agency Fund (LAIF) Uncategorized Not Rated 27% 4.40% 9,957,907 9,957,907 Dreyfus Money Market (TVI) Uncategorized Not Rated 0% 3.95% 7,178 7,178 Umpqua Bank Money Market Uncategorized Not Rated 5% 0.01% 2,017,968 2,017,968 Mututal Funds Uncategorized Not Rated 29% 4.14% 10,678,502 10,678,502 Certificates of Deposit Level 2 Not Rated 23% 3.17% 8,435,000 8,420,415 U.S. Government Bonds Level 2 AA/AAA 14% 3.90% 5,114,000 5,136,170 U.S. Treasury Securities Level 1 AA/AAA 1% 0.50% 500,000 490,153 Total Investments - Other City Wide Monterey County Pool 100% 3.68% 36,710,554 36,708,292 Total Cash and Investments - City Wide 3.63% 40,304,332 40,289,612 Difference in Cost/Market Value (14,720) -0.04%
Net Deposits / (Withdrawals) for Quarter
As required under State law, the City is able to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.
City of Pacific Grove
Cash and Investments Summary - All Funds
As of June 30, 2025
25%
32%
21%
15%
7%
Distribution of Cash and Investments
LAIF
Money Market / Mutual Funds
CDS
US Bonds
Bank Balances / Other
PGCC 9-17-25
City Of Pacific Grove
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY
Wgtd Avg YTM * 3.26% Sector Par Value YTM * Weight
Wgtd Avg YTM with Liq. Bal.* 3.59% Agencies 5,999,000 3.76% 23.5% Wgtd Avg YTW ** 3.25% Treasuries 500,000 0.65% 2.0%
Wgtd Avg Mat (no call) 2.06 yrs Certificates of Deposit 8,393,000 3.05% 32.8% Wgtd Avg Mat with Liq. Bal. 1.2 yrs Municipal Bonds
Wgtd Avg Mat (all called) 1.94 yrs Corporate Bonds
Mortgages
Market Value 5/31/2025 15,060,919 Commercial Paper
Market Value 6/30/2025 14,812,349 Supra Nationals
Difference (248,570) Total 14,892,000 3.26% 58.2%
Balance Rate Weight
Par Value 14,892,000 Money Market 10,678,502 4.05% 41.8% Liquid Balances 10,678,502
Total Par with Liquid Bal. 25,570,502
Current MV with Liquid Bal. 25,490,851
10,678,502 4.05% 41.8% *** All ratings are shown in S&P format. * Purchase Yield to Maturity ** Purchase Yield to Worst Ratings Do Not Include Liquid Balances. 0 - 3mo 3 - 6mo 6 - 12mo 1 - 2yr 2 - 3yr 3 - 4yr 4 - 5yr 5 - 7yr 7 - 10yr Over 10yr As of As of
6/30/2025 1Mo Ago 3Mos Ago 6Mos Ago 12/31/2024 1Yr Ago 3Yrs Ago 5Yrs Ago Cusip Reason Yield to Maturity:
Portfolio 3.26% 3.25% 3.38% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2-Year Treasury 4.39% 4.39% 4.39% 4.24% 4.25% 4.71% 2.92% 0.16% Fed Funds 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 5.50% 1.75% 0.25% Performance versus Benchmark as of 6/30/2025 Excluded Securities
3.66%
4.83% 5.00%
Bonds that are not found
will not be shown
9Mos Ago
n/a
1Yr Average
n/a
4.07%
Maturity Distribution
Portfolio Summary Portfolio Composition (incl. Liquid Balances) Portfolio Ratings (Worst***) Account Name
Total Liquid Balances
$.6MM
$1.7MM
$2.2MM
$3.1MM
$2.8MM
$3.4MM
$1.0MM
$0.0 $0.0 $0.0
$0
$.5MM
$1.MM
$1.5MM
$2.MM
$2.5MM
$3.MM
$3.5MM
$4.MM
3.4%
40.3%
56.4%
AAA AA+ NR
23.5%
2.0%
32.8%
41.8%
Agencies Treasuries Certificates of Deposit Liquid Balances 2 Report Date: 6/30/2025
PGCC 9-17-25
City Of Pacific Grove
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY
Type Par Aug-25 Sep-25 Dec-25 Jan-26 Feb-26 Mar-26 Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 Callable 1,143,000 0 96,264 0 10,078 0 0 0 170,744 0
Non-Callable 13,749,000 25,513 294,301 727,499 650,297 272,908 532,560 35,614 280,744 517,649 TOTAL 14,892,000 25,513 390,565 727,499 660,375 272,908 532,560 35,614 451,488 517,649 Interest Payments
Principal Payments
Cash-Flows - from 07/2025 to 06/2026 - Assuming None Called Jul-25 Oct-25 Nov-25
568,031 40,296 781,901
557,953 40,296 781,157
10,078 0 744
0 10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25 Oct-25 Nov-25 Dec-25 Jan-26 Feb-26 Mar-26 Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 0 100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25 Oct-25 Nov-25 Dec-25 Jan-26 Feb-26 Mar-26 Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 3 Report Date: 6/30/2025
PGCC 9-17-25
City Of Pacific Grove
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY
Type Par Aug-25 Sep-25 Dec-25 Jan-26 Feb-26 Mar-26 Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 Callable 1,143,000 0 96,264 0 10,078 0 0 0 170,744 0
Non-Callable 13,749,000 25,513 294,301 727,499 650,297 272,908 532,560 35,614 280,744 517,649 TOTAL 14,892,000 25,513 390,565 727,499 660,375 272,908 532,560 35,614 451,488 517,649 * Likelihood based on 06/30/2025 market rates
Interest Payments
Principal Payments
10,078 0 744
568,031 40,296 781,901
Cash-Flows - from 07/2025 to 06/2026 - Recognizing Likelihood of Call* Jul-25 Oct-25 Nov-25
557,953 40,296 781,157
0 10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25 Oct-25 Nov-25 Dec-25 Jan-26 Feb-26 Mar-26 Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 0 100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25 Oct-25 Nov-25 Dec-25 Jan-26 Feb-26 Mar-26 Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 4 Report Date: 6/30/2025
PGCC 9-17-25
City Of Pacific Grove
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY
# Cusip Par Value Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25 Oct-25 Nov-25 Dec-25 Jan-26 Feb-26 Mar-26 Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 Year 1 Total 1 60425SHY8 249,000 249,102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 249,102 2 06063HMT7 249,000 249,803 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 249,803 3 3133EL7K4* 96,000 0 0 96,264 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96,264 4 91282CAM3 250,000 0 0 250,313 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,313 5 05580AXU3 249,000 0 0 0 0 249,628 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 249,628 6 88241TJN1 249,000 123 127 127 123 249,127 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 249,627 7 108622LL3 249,000 92 95 95 92 249,095 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 249,469 8 02357QAN7 249,000 92 95 95 92 95 249,092 0 0 0 0 0 0 249,561 9 06251A2Q2 205,000 0 0 0 0 0 205,514 0 0 0 0 0 0 205,514 10 48128UTP4 248,000 0 0 0 0 0 248,622 0 0 0 0 0 0 248,622 11 25844MAM0 247,000 2,771 0 0 2,802 0 0 249,802 0 0 0 0 0 255,375 12 31422B6K1 95,000 228 0 0 0 0 0 95,228 0 0 0 0 0 95,456 13 530520AA3 249,000 931 962 962 931 962 931 249,962 0 0 0 0 0 255,641 14 45581ECE9 249,000 0 556 0 0 0 0 0 249,565 0 0 0 0 250,121 15 552249CG7 244,000 0 0 5,843 0 0 0 0 0 249,747 0 0 0 255,590 16 89789AAJ6 247,000 1,029 1,029 1,029 1,029 1,029 1,029 1,029 1,029 248,029 0 0 0 256,261 17 3133EMZC9* 170,000 0 0 0 0 744 0 0 0 0 0 170,744 0 171,488 18 91282CCF6 250,000 0 0 0 0 938 0 0 0 0 0 250,938 0 251,876 19 02007GSU8 246,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,700 0 0 0 0 0 249,680 253,380 20 90348JN48 249,000 153 159 159 153 159 153 159 159 143 159 153 249,159 250,868 21 649447UZ0 249,000 864 0 0 0 0 0 879 0 0 0 0 0 1,743
22 25460FDV5 249,000 972 1,005 1,005 972 1,005 972 1,005 1,005 907 1,005 972 1,005 11,830 23 07181JAV6 248,000 1,019 1,053 1,053 1,019 1,053 1,019 1,053 985 1,019 1,053 1,019 1,053 12,398 24 87164WH84 248,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,554 0 0 0 0 0 1,546 3,100 25 052392CH8 249,000 1,013 1,047 1,047 1,013 1,047 1,013 1,047 1,047 946 1,047 1,013 1,047 12,327 26 3133ENKG4* 530,000 3,896 0 0 0 0 0 3,896 0 0 0 0 0 7,792 27 3133ENKG4* 97,000 713 0 0 0 0 0 713 0 0 0 0 0 1,426
28 15118RE78 249,000 962 994 994 962 994 962 994 994 898 994 962 994 11,704 29 32116QBK1 244,000 0 0 0 0 5,474 0 0 0 0 0 5,384 0 10,858 30 254673G34 246,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,885 0 0 0 0 0 3,864 7,749 31 58404DSN2 249,000 921 952 952 921 952 921 952 952 860 952 921 952 11,208 32 438649AJ4 249,000 952 983 983 952 983 952 983 983 888 983 952 983 11,577 33 02589ADB5 246,000 3,965 0 0 0 0 0 4,030 0 0 0 0 0 7,995 34 90352RCU7 249,000 846 846 819 846 819 846 846 764 846 819 846 819 9,962 35 31422XH70 334,000 0 0 0 6,329 0 0 0 0 0 6,329 0 0 12,658 36 914098DJ4 249,000 860 888 888 860 888 860 888 831 860 888 860 888 10,459 37 01664MAB2 249,000 900 931 931 900 931 900 931 931 840 931 900 931 10,957 38 51828MAC8 249,000 921 952 952 921 952 921 952 952 860 952 921 952 11,208 39 45157PAZ3 249,000 921 952 952 921 952 921 952 890 921 952 921 952 11,207 40 01882MAA0 249,000 993 1,026 1,026 993 1,026 993 1,026 960 993 1,026 993 1,026 12,081 41 82671DAB3 249,000 900 931 931 900 931 900 931 931 840 931 900 931 10,957 42 61690U3L2 244,000 0 0 6,027 0 0 0 0 0 5,929 0 0 0 11,956 43 91527PBW6 249,000 839 867 867 839 867 839 867 867 783 867 839 867 10,208 44 3130AXEL8 250,000 0 0 5,938 0 0 0 0 0 5,938 0 0 0 11,876 Extended Cash-Flows
5 Report Date: 6/30/2025
PGCC 9-17-25
City Of Pacific Grove
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY
# Cusip Par Value Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25 Oct-25 Nov-25 Dec-25 Jan-26 Feb-26 Mar-26 Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 Year 1 Total Extended Cash-Flows
45 3133EPF91 500,000 0 0 0 0 11,250 0 0 0 0 0 11,250 0 22,500 46 3130AYJ31** 250,000 5,469 0 0 0 0 0 5,469 0 0 0 0 0 10,938 47 3133EPW84 750,000 14,531 0 0 0 0 0 14,531 0 0 0 0 0 29,062 48 3133ERQD6 500,000 0 9,063 0 0 0 0 0 9,063 0 0 0 0 18,126 49 3133EP5J0 500,000 0 0 10,313 0 0 0 0 0 10,313 0 0 0 20,626 50 3133EPXV2 500,000 0 0 0 11,563 0 0 0 0 0 11,563 0 0 23,126 51 3133EPXV2 180,000 0 0 0 4,163 0 0 0 0 0 4,163 0 0 8,326 52 3133ERKX8 1,000,000 21,250 0 0 0 0 0 21,250 0 0 0 0 0 42,500 TOTAL 14,892,000 568,031 25,513 390,565 40,296 781,901 727,499 660,375 272,908 532,560 35,614 451,488 517,649 5,004,399 * Callable - currently not likely to be called See Cash-Flows graph above "Recognizing Likelihood of Call" for current projected cash-flows ** Callable - currently likely to be called
6 Report Date: 6/30/2025
PGCC 9-17-25
City Of Pacific Grove
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY
Estimated Estimated
# CUSIP/Sec-ID Sec Desc 1 Weight Par Value Coupon * Settle Dt Mat Dt Nxt Call Dt Rating *** YTM ** YTW ** Duration Call Type Bps to Call Redem. Date 0 Total Liquid Balances 41.8% 10,678,502
1 60425SHY8 MINNWEST BK REDWOOD FALLS MINN 1.0% 249,000 0.500 7/15/2020 7/15/2025 NR 0.50 0.50 0.04 7/15/2025 2 06063HMT7 BANK OF BARODA 1.0% 249,000 0.650 7/22/2025 7/22/2025 NR 0.65 0.65 0.06 7/22/2025 3 3133EL7K4 FFCB 0.4% 96,000 0.550 9/21/2020 9/16/2025 7/8/2025 AA+ 0.51 0.51 0.20 Anytime (319) 9/16/2025 4 91282CAM3 TREAS SER AD-202 1.0% 250,000 0.250 7/16/2021 9/30/2025 AAA 0.60 0.60 0.24 9/30/2025 5 05580AXU3 BMW BK NORTH AMER SALT LAKE 1.0% 249,000 0.500 11/20/2020 11/20/2025 NR 0.50 0.50 0.38 11/20/2025 6 88241TJN1 TEXAS EXCHANGE BK CROWLEY CD 1.0% 249,000 0.600 11/25/2020 11/25/2025 NR 0.60 0.60 0.40 Monthly 11/25/2025 7 108622LL3 BRIDGEWATER BK ST LOUIS PK M 1.0% 249,000 0.450 11/30/2020 11/28/2025 NR 0.45 0.45 0.40 11/28/2025 8 02357QAN7 AMERANT BK NATL ASSNCORAL CD 1.0% 249,000 0.450 12/3/2020 12/3/2025 NR 0.45 0.45 0.42 12/3/2025 9 06251A2Q2 BANK HAPOALIM B M NEW YORK C 0.8% 205,000 0.500 12/14/2020 12/15/2025 NR 0.50 0.50 0.45 12/15/2025 10 48128UTP4 JPMORGAN CHASE BK N A CD 1.0% 248,000 0.500 12/15/2020 12/15/2025 NR 0.50 0.50 0.45 Semi-Annual 12/15/2025 11 25844MAM0 DORT FINL CR UN GRAND BLAN 1.0% 247,000 4.500 1/10/2023 1/12/2026 NR 4.50 4.50 0.51 1/12/2026 12 31422B6K1 FAMCA 0.4% 95,000 0.480 1/27/2021 1/15/2026 AA+ 0.40 0.40 0.53 1/15/2026 13 530520AA3 LIBERTY FIRST CR UN LINCOLN NE 1.0% 249,000 4.550 1/17/2023 1/20/2026 NR 4.55 4.55 0.54 1/20/2026 14 45581ECE9 INDUSTRIAL &COML BK CHINA 1.0% 249,000 0.450 2/11/2021 2/11/2026 NR 0.45 0.45 0.60 2/11/2026 15 552249CG7 LYONS NATL BK N Y CD 1.0% 244,000 4.750 3/15/2023 3/16/2026 NR 4.75 4.75 0.68 3/16/2026 16 89789AAJ6 TRULIANT FEDERAL CREDIT UNI 1.0% 247,000 5.000 3/28/2023 3/27/2026 AA+ 5.00 5.00 0.72 3/27/2026 17 3133EMZC9 FFCB 0.7% 170,000 0.875 5/13/2021 5/13/2026 7/8/2025 AA+ 0.84 0.83 0.85 Anytime (327) 5/13/2026 18 91282CCF6 T 1.0% 250,000 0.750 7/16/2021 5/31/2026 AAA 0.70 0.70 0.90 5/31/2026 19 02007GSU8 ALLY BK SANDY UTAH CD 1.0% 246,000 3.000 6/9/2022 6/9/2026 NR 3.00 3.00 0.91 6/9/2026 20 90348JN48 UBS BK USA SALT LAKECITY UT CD 1.0% 249,000 0.750 6/23/2021 6/23/2026 NR 0.75 0.75 0.97 6/23/2026 21 649447UZ0 FLAGSTAR BK NATL ASSN HICKS 1.0% 249,000 0.700 6/30/2021 7/1/2026 NR 0.70 0.70 0.98 7/1/2026 22 25460FDV5 DIRECT FED CR UN NEEDHAM MA 1.0% 249,000 4.750 11/7/2022 11/9/2026 NR 4.75 4.75 1.30 11/9/2026 23 07181JAV6 BAXTER CR UN VERNON HILLS ILL 1.0% 248,000 5.000 11/28/2022 11/30/2026 NR 5.00 5.00 1.36 11/30/2026 24 87164WH84 SYNCHRONY BANK CD 1.0% 248,000 1.250 12/10/2021 12/10/2026 NR 1.25 1.25 1.41 12/10/2026 25 052392CH8 AUSTIN TELCO FED CR UN TEX 1.0% 249,000 4.950 12/16/2022 12/16/2026 NR 4.95 4.95 1.40 12/16/2026 26 3133ENKG4 FFCB 2.1% 530,000 1.470 1/31/2022 1/11/2027 7/8/2025 AA+ 1.67 1.67 1.48 Anytime (244) 1/11/2027 27 3133ENKG4 FFCB 0.4% 97,000 1.470 1/27/2022 1/11/2027 7/8/2025 AA+ 1.67 1.67 1.48 Anytime (244) 1/11/2027 28 15118RE78 CELTIC BK SALT LAKE CITY UTAH 1.0% 249,000 4.700 3/17/2023 3/17/2027 NR 4.70 4.70 1.64 3/17/2027 29 32116QBK1 FIRST NATL BK MIDDLETENN CD 1.0% 244,000 4.450 5/23/2023 5/19/2027 NR 4.45 4.45 1.78 5/19/2027 30 254673G34 CAPITAL ONE NATL ASSN VA CD 1.0% 246,000 3.150 6/7/2022 6/7/2027 NR 3.15 3.15 1.85 6/7/2027 31 58404DSN2 MEDALLION BK UTAH CD 1.0% 249,000 4.500 6/16/2023 6/16/2027 NR 4.50 4.50 1.87 6/16/2027 Portfolio Details - Sorted by Maturity
Maturity Distribution
4.0%
11.4%
15.1%
20.9%
18.9%
23.0%
6.7%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
0 - 3mo 3 - 6mo 6 - 12mo 1 - 2yr 2 - 3yr 3 - 4yr 4 - 5yr 5 - 7yr 7 - 10yr Over 10yr 7 Report Date: 6/30/2025
PGCC 9-17-25
City Of Pacific Grove
Portfolio Details - Sorted by Maturity
32 438649AJ4 HONOLULU FIRE DEPT FED CR UN 1.0% 249,000 4.650 6/22/2023 6/22/2027 NR 4.65 4.65 1.88 6/22/2027 33 02589ADB5 AMERICAN EXPRESS NATL BK BR 1.0% 246,000 3.250 7/13/2022 7/13/2027 NR 3.25 3.25 1.92 7/13/2027 34 90352RCU7 USALLIANCE FCU RYE NEW YORK 1.0% 249,000 4.000 9/30/2022 9/30/2027 NR 4.00 4.00 2.14 9/30/2027 35 31422XH70 FAMCA 1.3% 334,000 3.790 11/22/2023 10/4/2027 AA+ 4.50 4.50 2.13 10/4/2027 36 914098DJ4 UNIVERSITY BK ANN ARBOR MICH 1.0% 249,000 4.200 11/30/2022 11/30/2027 NR 4.20 4.20 2.28 11/30/2027 37 01664MAB2 ALL IN FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AL 1.0% 249,000 4.400 12/20/2022 12/20/2027 NR 4.40 4.40 2.33 12/20/2027 38 51828MAC8 LATINO CMNTY CR UN DURHAM NOR 1.0% 249,000 4.500 12/21/2022 12/21/2027 NR 4.50 4.50 2.33 12/21/2027 39 45157PAZ3 IDEAL CR UN WOODBURYMN 1.0% 249,000 4.500 12/29/2022 12/29/2027 NR 4.50 4.50 2.35 12/29/2027 40 01882MAA0 ALLIANT CR UN CHICAGO IL 1.0% 249,000 4.850 12/30/2022 12/30/2027 NR 4.85 4.85 2.35 12/30/2027 41 82671DAB3 SIGNATURE FED CR UN ALEXANDRIA 1.0% 249,000 4.400 1/31/2023 1/31/2028 NR 4.40 4.40 2.42 1/31/2028 42 61690U3L2 MORGAN STANLEY BK N A CD 1.0% 244,000 4.900 3/24/2023 3/23/2028 NR 4.90 4.90 2.50 3/23/2028 43 91527PBW6 UNIVEST NATL BK TR SOUDERTON 1.0% 249,000 4.100 5/5/2023 5/5/2028 NR 4.10 4.10 2.66 5/5/2028 44 3130AXEL8 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK M1-2028 1.0% 250,000 4.750 10/31/2023 9/8/2028 AA+ 4.77 4.77 2.90 9/8/2028 45 3133EPF91 FFCB 2.0% 500,000 4.500 11/27/2023 11/27/2028 AA+ 4.40 4.40 3.12 11/27/2028 46 3130AYJ31 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK TU-2029 1.0% 250,000 4.375 1/17/2024 1/17/2029 7/17/2026 AA+ 4.24 4.12 0.99 58 7/17/2026 47 3133EPW84 FFCB 2.9% 750,000 3.875 1/18/2024 1/18/2029 AA+ 3.92 3.92 3.23 1/18/2029 48 3133ERQD6 FFCB 2.0% 500,000 3.625 8/20/2024 2/20/2029 AA+ 3.61 3.61 3.33 2/20/2029 49 3133EP5J0 FFCB 2.0% 500,000 4.125 3/21/2024 3/12/2029 AA+ 4.22 4.22 3.36 3/12/2029 50 3133EPXV2 FFCB 2.0% 500,000 4.625 4/26/2024 4/5/2029 AA+ 4.65 4.65 3.40 4/5/2029 51 3133EPXV2 FFCB 0.7% 180,000 4.625 4/30/2024 4/5/2029 AA+ 4.66 4.66 3.40 4/5/2029 52 3133ERKX8 FFCB 3.9% 1,000,000 4.250 7/22/2024 7/12/2029 AA+ 4.09 4.09 3.60 7/12/2029 TOTAL and AVERAGES 100.0% 25,570,502 2.06 yrs 1.94 yrs 3.26 3.25 1.87 * Semi-Annual interest payment ** Yields calculated using cost price, at settlement date *** Ratings Shown Are: Lowest Rating in S&P format, NR AGY = Non-Rated U.S. Government Agency 8 Report Date: 6/30/2025
PGCC 9-17-25
City Of Pacific Grove
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY
Callables purchased at Discount
3133EKPP5
3133EKTT3
Unrealized
# CUSIP/Sec-ID Sec Desc 1 Cpn Mat Dt Par Value Cost Purch Px Book Val Book Px Book YTM Mkt Val Mkt Px Mkt YTM Gain/Loss 1 60425SHY8 MINNWEST BK REDWOOD FALLS MINN0.50 7/15/2025 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 0.50 247,767 99.51 12.56 (1,233) 2 06063HMT7 BANK OF BARODA 0.65 7/22/2025 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 0.65 247,618 99.44 0.65 (1,382) 3 3133EL7K4 FFCB 0.55 9/16/2025 96,000 96,189 100.20 96,008 100.01 0.51 94,898 98.85 6.05 (1,110) 4 91282CAM3 TREAS SER AD-202 0.25 9/30/2025 250,000 246,367 98.55 249,780 99.91 0.60 246,617 98.65 5.71 (3,163) 5 05580AXU3 BMW BK NORTH AMER SALT LAKE 0.50 11/20/2025 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 0.50 244,476 98.18 5.27 (4,524) 6 88241TJN1 TEXAS EXCHANGE BK CROWLEY CD0.60 11/25/2025 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 0.60 244,330 98.12 5.35 (4,670) 7 108622LL3 BRIDGEWATER BK ST LOUIS PK M 0.45 11/28/2025 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 0.45 244,291 98.11 5.14 (4,709) 8 02357QAN7 AMERANT BK NATL ASSNCORAL CD 0.45 12/3/2025 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 0.45 244,127 98.04 5.12 (4,873) 9 06251A2Q2 BANK HAPOALIM B M NEW YORK C0.50 12/15/2025 205,000 205,000 100.00 205,000 100.00 0.50 201,337 98.21 4.47 (3,663) # 48128UTP4 JPMORGAN CHASE BK N A CD 0.50 12/15/2025 248,000 248,000 100.00 248,000 100.00 0.50 242,936 97.96 5.05 (5,064) # 25844MAM0 DORT FINL CR UN GRAND BLAN 4.50 1/12/2026 247,000 247,000 100.00 247,000 100.00 4.50 247,287 100.12 4.28 287 # 31422B6K1 FAMCA 0.48 1/15/2026 95,000 95,373 100.39 95,041 100.04 0.40 92,750 97.63 4.96 (2,291) # 530520AA3 LIBERTY FIRST CR UN LINCOLN NE 4.55 1/20/2026 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.55 249,334 100.13 4.30 334 # 45581ECE9 INDUSTRIAL &COML BK CHINA 0.45 2/11/2026 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 0.45 242,329 97.32 4.89 (6,671) # 552249CG7 LYONS NATL BK N Y CD 4.75 3/16/2026 244,000 244,000 100.00 244,000 100.00 4.75 244,673 100.28 4.34 673 # 89789AAJ6 TRULIANT FEDERAL CREDIT UNI 5.00 3/27/2026 247,000 247,000 100.00 247,000 100.00 5.00 248,131 100.46 4.36 1,131 # 3133EMZC9 FFCB 0.88 5/13/2026 170,000 170,291 100.17 170,051 100.03 0.84 164,656 96.86 4.60 (5,395) # 91282CCF6 T 0.75 5/31/2026 250,000 250,596 100.24 250,114 100.05 0.70 241,635 96.65 4.51 (8,479) # 02007GSU8 ALLY BK SANDY UTAH CD 3.00 6/9/2026 246,000 246,000 100.00 246,000 100.00 3.00 242,777 98.69 4.43 (3,223) # 90348JN48 UBS BK USA SALT LAKECITY UT CD 0.75 6/23/2026 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 0.75 239,797 96.30 4.63 (9,203) # 649447UZ0 FLAGSTAR BK NATL ASSN HICKS 0.70 7/1/2026 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 0.70 239,573 96.21 4.59 (9,427) # 25460FDV5 DIRECT FED CR UN NEEDHAM MA 4.75 11/9/2026 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.75 250,803 100.72 4.20 1,803 # 07181JAV6 BAXTER CR UN VERNON HILLS ILL 5.00 11/30/2026 248,000 248,000 100.00 248,000 100.00 5.00 250,800 101.13 4.17 2,800 # 87164WH84 SYNCHRONY BANK CD 1.25 12/10/2026 248,000 248,000 100.00 248,000 100.00 1.25 237,311 95.69 4.36 (10,689) # 052392CH8 AUSTIN TELCO FED CR UN TEX 4.95 12/16/2026 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.95 251,712 101.09 4.18 2,712 # 3133ENKG4 FFCB 1.47 1/11/2027 530,000 524,988 99.05 528,404 99.70 1.67 508,053 95.86 4.29 (20,351) Agency Distribution Callable Breakdown Portfolio Composition Amortization/Accretion Book Calculations
91.8%
8.2%
FFCB Other
40.3%
3.4%
53.0%
3.3%
Agencies Treasuries
Certificates of Deposit Municipal Bonds
9.3%
90.7%
Callable Non-Callable
45.1%
As percent of
Callables
4.2%
As percent of
Portfolio
1 Report Date: 6/30/2025
PGCC 9-17-25
City Of Pacific Grove
Amortization/Accretion Book Calculations
# 3133ENKG4 FFCB 1.47 1/11/2027 97,000 96,081 99.05 96,708 99.70 1.67 92,983 95.86 4.29 (3,725) # 15118RE78 CELTIC BK SALT LAKE CITY UTAH 4.70 3/17/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.70 251,211 100.89 4.16 2,211 # 32116QBK1 FIRST NATL BK MIDDLETENN CD 4.45 5/19/2027 244,000 244,000 100.00 244,000 100.00 4.45 245,240 100.51 4.16 1,240 # 254673G34 CAPITAL ONE NATL ASSN VA CD 3.15 6/7/2027 246,000 246,000 100.00 246,000 100.00 3.15 241,218 98.06 4.20 (4,782) # 58404DSN2 MEDALLION BK UTAH CD 4.50 6/16/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.50 250,666 100.67 4.14 1,666 # 438649AJ4 HONOLULU FIRE DEPT FED CR UN 4.65 6/22/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.65 251,413 100.97 4.14 2,413 # 02589ADB5 AMERICAN EXPRESS NATL BK BR 3.25 7/13/2027 246,000 246,000 100.00 246,000 100.00 3.25 241,481 98.16 4.20 (4,519) # 90352RCU7 USALLIANCE FCU RYE NEW YORK 4.00 9/30/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.00 248,046 99.62 4.18 (954) # 31422XH70 FAMCA 3.79 10/4/2027 334,000 325,656 97.50 328,938 98.48 4.50 332,220 99.47 4.04 3,282 # 914098DJ4 UNIVERSITY BK ANN ARBOR MICH 4.20 11/30/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.20 249,147 100.06 4.17 147 # 01664MAB2 ALL IN FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AL 4.40 12/20/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.40 250,309 100.53 4.17 1,309 # 51828MAC8 LATINO CMNTY CR UN DURHAM NOR4.50 12/21/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.50 252,317 101.33 3.93 3,317 # 45157PAZ3 IDEAL CR UN WOODBURYMN 4.50 12/29/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.50 250,666 100.67 4.22 1,666 # 01882MAA0 ALLIANT CR UN CHICAGO IL 4.85 12/30/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.85 253,086 101.64 4.16 4,086 # 82671DAB3 SIGNATURE FED CR UN ALEXANDRIA4.40 1/31/2028 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.40 251,891 101.16 3.92 2,891 # 61690U3L2 MORGAN STANLEY BK N A CD 4.90 3/23/2028 244,000 244,000 100.00 244,000 100.00 4.90 248,416 101.81 4.19 4,416 # 91527PBW6 UNIVEST NATL BK TR SOUDERTON 4.10 5/5/2028 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.10 248,305 99.72 4.20 (695) # 3130AXEL8 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK M1-20284.75 9/8/2028 250,000 249,783 99.91 249,845 99.94 4.77 254,865 101.95 4.09 5,020 # 3133EPF91 FFCB 4.50 11/27/2028 500,000 502,222 100.44 501,548 100.31 4.40 507,345 101.47 4.03 5,797 # 3130AYJ31 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK TU-20294.38 1/17/2029 250,000 251,500 100.60 251,091 100.44 4.24 249,013 99.61 4.50 (2,079) # 3133EPW84 FFCB 3.88 1/18/2029 750,000 748,500 99.80 748,893 99.85 3.92 743,085 99.08 4.16 (5,808) # 3133ERQD6 FFCB 3.63 2/20/2029 500,000 500,309 100.06 500,237 100.05 3.61 490,995 98.20 4.16 (9,242) # 3133EP5J0 FFCB 4.13 3/12/2029 500,000 497,883 99.58 498,362 99.67 4.22 499,825 99.97 4.13 1,463 # 3133EPXV2 FFCB 4.63 4/5/2029 500,000 499,400 99.88 499,508 99.90 4.65 511,190 102.24 3.98 11,682 # 3133EPXV2 FFCB 4.63 4/5/2029 180,000 179,759 99.87 179,804 99.89 4.66 184,028 102.24 3.98 4,225 # 3133ERKX8 FFCB 4.25 7/12/2029 1,000,000 1,007,345 100.73 1,006,065 100.61 4.09 1,003,370 100.34 4.16 (2,695) TOTAL and AVERAGES 14,892,000 14,882,240 14,890,397 3.26 14,812,349 4.42 (78,048) 2 Report Date: 6/30/2025
PGCC 9-17-25
Agenda No. 8 D
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Fred Marsh, Administrative Services Director
MEETING DATE: September 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Fourth Quarter 24-25 Interim Financial Statements CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
1. Receive the report.
2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
DISCUSSION
The Administrative Services Department produces quarterly Interim Financial reports to assist in evaluating the City's fiscal condition. The attached report provides details on General Fund revenues and expenditures, as well as a summary related to its other funds. It should be noted that included as part of the projected deficit for the General Fund for Fiscal Year 2024-25 is approximately $1.2 million of one-time capital projects that were approved by Council as part of mid year adjustments in October 2024 and March 2025. The base projected operating deficit for the year, excluding these one-time adjustments, and excluding possible carryovers of some outstanding purchase orders to Fiscal Year 2025-26, is approximately $1 million.
OPTIONS
N/A - This is information only.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact.
FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.
Attachments
Combined Interim Budget Status Report
PGCC 9-17-25
City of Pacific Grove
California
Interim Budget Status Report
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025
City of Pacific Grove
300 Forest Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
www.cityofpacificgrove.org
PGCC 9-17-25
Matthew Mogensen
City Manager
Table of Contents
Revenues by Fund ................................................. 3 Expenses by Fund ................................................. 4 General Fund Revenue and Expense Reports ....... 5
Enterprise Expense Funds Reports ........................ 8 Internal Service Expense Reports .......................... 9 Fund Numbers and Descriptions ......................... 10 General Fund Revenue Overview ........................ 11 Departmental Expenditure Overview .................. 12 Mission and Vision
Mission: To deliver quality professional public
services in the City and region
Vision: To thoughtfully grow as an inclusive
community, protecting its character
Core Values
Leadership: Uphold the highest work ethic
Inclusiveness: Cultivate an environment of trust
Integrity: Safeguard public trust
Collaboration: Promote transparent engagement
Stewardship: Protect our natural environment
Focused Priority Areas and Goals
Recreation: Robust and accessible activities
Infrastructure: Maintain community assets
Stewardship: Implement sustainable practices
Housing: Diversity affordable opportunities
City Council Fiscal Year 2024-25
Mayor: Nick Smith
Councilmembers: Joe Amelio, Mayor Pro Tempore
Cynthia Garfield
Lori McDonnell
Chaps Poduri
Tina Rau
Paul Walkingstick
The City of Pacific Grove
presents its interim financials
for Fiscal Year 2024-25.
This report presents the City’s
overall financial condition in
an easy to read format for all
users, focusing on major
revenues and expenses by
major fund type.
Summary of Annual Report
This report is an interim financial
update on the City’s various
funds, including its General,
Sewer, Local Water and
Cemetery funds, as presented in
more detail in the City’s adopted
budget for FY 2024-25.
Audit Opinion / Awards for Excellence
The City has received a “clean” unmodified audit
opinion for its prior audited financial reports, and
a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in
Financial Reporting (COA) from the Government
Finance Officers Association (GFOA). In addition,
the City has received awards for excellence for its
operating budget from GFOA and the California
Society of Municipal Finance Officers. These
awards focus on providing quality documents
that are easy to understand by the public.
Social Media for the City
Website: cityofpacificgrove.org
Facebook: CityofPacificGrove
X/Twitter: @PacificGrove
Welcome Message
From the
City Manager
City of Pacific Grove
Interim Financials
Fiscal Year 2024-25
PGCC 9-17-25
Revenues by Fund - FY 2024-25 (Unaudited)
Through June 2025 (Preliminary Results)
100% of Budget Year Complete
Fund Revised Budget YTD
YTD % of
Budget Prior YTD
Projected
Change for
Fiscal Year
Projected
Ending
Reserves *
Main Fund - Fund 01 $ 33,288,027 $ 33,794,192 102% 33,239,014 $ $ (2,174,808) $ 15,221,382 Other Funds Included 24,700 36,514 148% 36,459 (8,047) 177,551 General Fund 33,312,727 33,830,706 102% 33,275,473 (2,182,855) 15,398,933 Capital Projects $ 3,084,533 $ 3,030,673 98% $ 900,002 $ 1,958,735 $ 2,318,931 Capital Funds 3,084,533 3,030,673 98% 900,002 1,958,735 2,318,931 Local Water Project 1,310,187 1,711,309 131% 1,217,433 (103,792) (326,358) Cemetery 653,000 691,528 106% 764,656 (34,538) 1,051,707 Sewer 4,248,000 4,338,766 102% 4,189,214 702,547 9,296,765 Golf 762,000 949,883 125% 837,625 104,550 972,144
Sewer Lateral Loans 4,000 14,477 200% 8,200 14,477 181,405 Enterprise Funds 6,977,187 7,705,963 110% 7,017,128 683,244 11,175,663 Employee Benefit 265,000 275,254 104% 348,321 (95,360) 64,160 Worker's Compensation 722,113 868,129 120% 568,519 (389,205) 209,575 Liability Insurance 752,000 1,144,167 152% 1,143,440 457,487 1,050,206 Internal Service Funds 1,739,113 2,287,550 132% 2,060,280 (27,078) 1,323,941 Library 22,000 48,851 200% 43,196 48,851 614,488
Cemetery 113,000 209,448 185% 177,927 209,448 2,354,702 Yount 8,000 31,657 200% 16,675 23,808 805,179
Trust Funds 143,000 289,956 200% 237,798 282,107 3,774,369 Library / Poetry 97,283 137,533 141% 101,942 58,315 318,566 Museum 4,000 21,724 200% 16,939 (42,151) 302,672
Public Safety 800,225 859,808 107% 738,289 167,034 525,098 Housing 31,000 79,967 200% 104,863 (19,706) 1,027,398
Streets 1,596,839 1,780,630 112% 1,711,967 761 1,594,666 Lighthouse 90,000 138,526 154% 127,997 6,812 230,782
Community Development/CDBG 21,200 56,715 200% 64,582 (4,776) 1,448,113 ARPA 15,000 31,067 200% 49,418 (802,173) 92,996
Downtown/Hospitality Districts 695,650 609,383 88% 598,673 26,266 57,737 Cable Franchise / Other 97,650 182,720 187% 576,090 (48,350) 261,726 Other Funds 3,448,847 3,898,073 113% 4,090,760 (657,968) 5,859,754 Totals All Funds $ 48,705,407 $ 51,042,921 105% $ 47,581,441 $ 56,185 $ 39,851,591 * Excludes Proposed Adjustments and Rollovers
Revenues Working Capital
102%
98%
110%
132%
200%
113%
105%
General Fund
Capital Funds
Enterprise Funds
Internal Service Funds
Trust Funds
Other Funds
Totals All Funds
Budgeted Revenues / YTD % of Budget - By Fund Type
PGCC 9-17-25
Fund
Main Fund - Fund 01
Other Funds Included
General Fund
Capital Projects
Capital Funds
Local Water Project
Cemetery
Sewer
Golf
Sewer Lateral Loans
Enterprise Funds
Employee Benefit
Worker's Compensation
Liability Insurance
Internal Service Funds
Library
Cemetery
Yount
Trust Funds
Library / Poetry
Museum
Public Safety
Housing
Streets
Lighthouse
Community Development/CDBG
ARPA
Downtown/Hospitality Districts
Cable Franchise / Other
Other Funds
Totals All Funds
Expenses by Fund - FY 2024-25 (Unaudited)
Through June 2025 (Preliminary Results)
100% of Budget Year Complete
Revised Budget YTD
YTD % of
Projected
Purchase
Orders
YTD %
with POs Prior YTD
$ 37,771,379 $ 35,115,779 93% 853,221 $ 95% 30,366,615 $ 26,193 44,561 170% - 170% 43,365
37,797,572 35,160,340 93% 853,221 95% 30,409,980
$ 1,937,033 $ 1,019,291 53% $ 52,647 55% $ 562,432
1,937,033 1,019,291 53% 52,647 55% 562,432
1,010,925 1,788,280 177% 26,821 180% 1,121,475
720,349 726,066 101% - 101% 438,861
6,032,635 3,341,020 55% 295,199 60% 2,037,771
755,057 845,333 112% - 112% 468,764
- - 0% - 0% -
8,518,966 6,700,699 79% 322,020 82% 4,066,871
332,000 370,614 112% - 112% 282,458
735,949 1,257,334 171% - 171% 651,041
717,003 686,680 96% - 96% 464,021
1,784,952 2,314,628 130% - 130% 1,397,520
- - 0% - 0% -
- - 0% - 0% -
8,000 7,849 98% - 98% 8,000
8,000 7,849 98% - 98% 8,000
100,571 71,018 71% 8,200 79% 131,015
165,800 58,809 35% 5,066 39% -
822,377 676,767 82% 16,007 84% 735,491
297,718 99,673 33% - 33% 137,062
3,773,841 1,375,965 36% 403,904 47% 1,754,556
199,450 131,714 66% - 66% 99,058
20,000 22,491 112% 39,000 200% (34,974)
828,872 833,240 101% - 101% 228,414
632,400 583,117 92% - 92% 586,605
146,000 97,539 67% 39,000 94% 558,641
6,987,029 3,950,333 57% 511,177 64% 4,195,868
$ 57,033,552 $ 49,153,140 86% $ 1,739,065 89% $ 40,640,671 Expenses
93%
53%
79%
130%
98%
57%
86%
General Fund
Capital Funds
Enterprise Funds
Internal Service Funds
Trust Funds
Other Funds
Totals All Funds
Budgeted Expenses / YTD % of Budget By Fund Type
PGCC 9-17-25
General Fund Revenues - FY 2024-25 (Unaudited)
Through June 2025 (Preliminary Results)
100% of Budget Year Complete
Revenue Account Revised Budget YTD Revenues
YTD % of
Budget
Year End
Projection
Prior YTD
Revenues
Prior YTD %
of PY Budget
Property Taxes $ 10,411,000 $ 10,625,123 102% 10,626,000 $ $ 10,135,764 100% Sales Taxes 6,094,000 5,182,282 85% 5,183,000 5,975,031 100% Business License/Cannabis Taxes 583,000 298,287 51% 299,000 697,772 100% Franchise Taxes 1,659,000 1,265,347 76% 1,266,000 1,635,968 100% Utility User Taxes 2,043,000 2,321,453 114% 2,322,000 2,320,832 110% Transient Occupancy Tax 6,922,000 6,937,463 100% 6,938,000 6,730,240 100% Litter Abatement 210,000 159,319 76% 160,000 202,763 100% Construction Permits 1,191,000 1,030,971 87% 1,031,000 1,171,235 100% Zoning Enforcement 283,250 215,517 76% 216,000 205,793 100% Plan Check Fees 705,000 559,406 79% 560,000 502,812 100% Parking Meters 373,000 361,489 97% 362,000 337,465 100% Water Entitlements 575,187 1,612,353 200% 1,613,000 579,659 100% Interest Earned 250,000 774,415 200% 767,000 485,944 100% Investment Market Value Gain/Loss - 287,610 200% 288,000 352,385 100% Indirect Cost Reimbursement 551,000 552,000 100% 552,000 404,000 100% Total Major Revenues 31,850,437 32,183,035 101% 32,183,000 31,737,663 101% Total General Fund Revenues $ 33,312,727 $ 33,830,706 102% $ 33,831,000 $ 33,239,016 100% FY 2022-23 Tax Revenues Property Taxes Sales Taxes BL/Other Franchise Hotel Taxes Utility 9,330,981 5,614,305 549,856 1,570,875 6,635,688 2,097,934 102%
85%
51%
76%
114%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
110%
100%
Property Taxes - $10.4 million
Sales Taxes - $6.1 million
Business License/Cannabis Taxes - $0.6 million
Franchise Taxes - $1.7 million
Utility User Taxes - $2.0 million
Transient Occupancy Tax - $6.9 million
Budgeted Tax Revenues / YTD % of Budget - Current YTD vs Prior YTD 24-25 23-24
PGCC 9-17-25
General Fund Expenses (including Transfer) by Department - FY 2024-25 (Unaudited) Through June 2025 (Preliminary Results)
100% of Budget Year Complete
Department
Revised
Budget
YTD
Expenditures
YTD % of
Budget
Outstanding
Purchase
Orders
YTD %
with POs
Year End
Projection
City Council / Non Dept 3,719,309 $ $ 3,702,456 100% $ 100% 3,719,000 3,405 $ City Attorney 1,184,360 864,018 73% 3,367 73% 1,184,000 City Manager 1,681,819 1,512,054 90% 43,568 92% 1,650,000 Admin Services 2,801,693 2,610,317 93% 110,213 97% 3,900,000 Community Development 3,391,158 3,150,849 93% 155,810 98% 3,300,000 Police 10,134,665 9,569,487 94% 78,667 95% 10,000,000
Fire 5,779,600 5,784,086 100% 896 100% 5,770,000
Library 1,247,776 1,223,426 98% 1,976 98% 1,200,000
Museum 384,300 382,111 99% - 99% 384,000
Recreation 1,683,839 1,678,145 100% 316 100% 1,744,000
Public Works 5,762,860 4,640,824 81% 241,892 85% 5,583,000 Total General Fund $ 37,771,379 $ 35,117,772 93% $ 640,108 95% $ 38,434,000 100%
73%
90%
93%
93%
94%
100%
98%
99%
100%
81%
93%
100%
City Council / Non Dept
City Attorney
City Manager
Admin Services
Community Development
Police
Fire
Library
Museum
Recreation
Public Works
Total General Fund
Percent of Year Complete
Revised Budget / YTD % of Budget - By Department
PGCC 9-17-25
General Fund Expenditure Report - FY 2024-25 (Unaudited) Through June 2025 (Preliminary Results)
100% of Budget Year Complete
Expense Line Item Revised Budget YTD
YTD % of
Budget
Purchase
Orders
YTD % with
POs
Salaries 11,192,302 10,172,143 91% 0 91%
Contract/Professional Services 7,907,001 7,790,818 99% 506,264 105% Unfunded Pension Liability 4,212,163 4,212,163 100% 0 100% Fund Transfers Capital / Other 3,722,220 3,722,653 100% 0 100% Debt Service 1,462,562 1,462,562 100% 0 100%
Legal Services / Retainer 1,293,360 877,309 68% 3,367 68% Health Insurance 1,278,811 1,027,781 80% 0 80%
Retirement (PERS) 1,114,650 947,031 85% 0 85%
Internal Service Charges 1,090,000 1,089,890 100% 0 100% Utilities 804,309 922,185 115% 14,651 116%
Repairs and Maintenance 671,050 434,593 65% 11,528 66%
Equipment and Related Leases 649,999 317,146 49% 3,825 49% Other Employee Benefits 600,748 591,705 98% 0 98%
Supplies 521,203 389,096 75% 11,929 77%
Other Operating Costs 455,850 399,169 88% 31,505 94%
Software Licenses and Support 337,451 357,001 106% 16,665 111% Subscriptions and Memberships 282,200 276,788 98% 40,375 112% Meetings / Travel / Training 175,500 129,486 74% 0 74%
Grand Total $ 37,771,379 $ 35,119,520 93% $ 640,108 95% 91%
99%
100%
100%
100%
68%
80%
85%
100%
115%
65%
49%
98%
75%
88%
106%
98%
74%
93%
100%
Salaries
Contract/Professional Services
Unfunded Pension Liability
Fund Transfers Capital / Other
Debt Service
Legal Services / Retainer
Health Insurance
Retirement (PERS)
Internal Service Charges
Utilities
Repairs and Maintenance
Equipment and Related Leases
Other Employee Benefits
Supplies
Other Operating Costs
Software Licenses and Support
Subscriptions and Memberships
Meetings / Travel / Training
Grand Total
Budget or Projected / YTD % of Budget - Major Expense Categories Percent of Year Complete
PGCC 9-17-25
Expense Report by Object - Enterprise Funds - FY 2024-25 (Unaudited) Through June 2025 (Preliminary Results)
100% of Budget Year Complete
Fund / Expense Line Item CY BUDGET CY Expenses % CY Budget PY Budget PY Expenses % PY Budget 74 - Local Water Project 1,360,925 1,788,280 131% 972,449 972,048 100% Supplies And Services 25,000 1,467 6% 15,000 1,428 10%
Contract Services 419,476 497,952 119% 410,000 422,363 103% Fund Transfers 350,000 350,000 100% 0 0 #DIV/0!
Indirect And ISF Charges 50,000 50,000 100% 31,000 31,000 100% Debt Service 206,449 206,448 100% 206,449 205,778 100%
Project Utilities 310,000 682,413 220% 310,000 311,479 100% Cemetery Services And Supplies 720,349 726,066 101% 704,746 581,635 83% Services And Supplies 114,650 89,452 78% 170,750 147,897 87% Salaries And Benefits 315,699 274,822 87% 224,996 164,871 73% Indirect Costs And Isf Charges 169,000 169,000 100% 120,000 119,000 99% Utilities 121,000 192,792 159% 189,000 149,867 79%
Sewer Debt Service / Asbs Grant 6,032,635 3,407,056 56% 6,262,165 2,259,202 36% Debt Service 89,689 88,689 99% 86,815 20,336 23%
Other Operating Costs 394,069 119,256 30% 394,069 126,666 32% Capital Improvements 3,248,637 986,767 30% 3,633,560 0 0% Employee Salaries 637,237 629,571 99% 578,069 563,853 98% Contract Services 374,725 503,189 134% 374,725 409,706 109% Employee Benefits 174,278 156,485 90% 166,362 163,071 98% Indirect Cost / ISF Charges 423,000 423,000 100% 376,000 375,000 100% Maintenance Services 450,000 279,408 62% 429,565 409,799 95% Unfunded Pension Liability 141,000 141,000 100% 123,000 123,000 100% Utilities 100,000 79,691 80% 100,000 67,772 68%
Golf Cip And Equipment 755,057 845,333 112% 705,098 382,323 54% Capital Projects And Equipment 108,000 108,789 101% 68,000 112,372 165% Services And Supplies 30,000 0 0% 30,000 21,929 73%
Debt Service 272,057 272,004 100% 272,098 62,981 23%
Utilities 20,000 24,568 123% 20,000 22,290 111%
Indirect Cost Allocation 20,000 20,000 100% 10,000 10,000 100% Utilities 305,000 419,972 138% 305,000 152,752 50%
$ 8,868,966 $ 6,766,735 76% 8,644,458 $ $ 4,195,208 49% 131%
101%
56%
112%
100%
83%
36%
54%
Local Water Project - $1.0 million
Cemetery - $0.7 million
Sewer - $6.0 million
Golf - $0.8 million
CY Budget or Projected / YTD % of Budget - By Fund
YTD % of CY Budget
YTD % of PY Budget
PGCC 9-17-25
Internal Service Funds Expense Report - FY 2024-25 (Unaudited) Through June 2025 (Preliminary Results)
100% of Budget Year Complete
Fund / Expense Line Item CY BUDGET CY Expenses % CY Budget PY Budget PY Expenses % PY Budget 70 - Employee Benefit Fund 332,000 369,989 111% 330,000 282,458 86% Other Costs 89,000 100,641 113% 80,100 83,549 104%
Health Benf. Reimbrmst 57,000 41,234 72% 62,000 53,060 86% Health Insurance Cost 183,000 228,692 125% 185,000 142,998 77% Unemployment Claims 3,000 -577 -19% 2,900 2,851 98%
71 - Workers Compensation 735,949 1,257,334 171% 844,566 767,765 91% Services And Supplies 25,000 6,713 27% 24,500 11,259 46% Salary And Benefits 55,949 24,170 43% 20,066 17,807 89% Insurance Premiums 305,000 277,919 91% 275,000 287,582 105% Insurance Claims 350,000 948,533 271% 525,000 451,118 86% 72 - Liability Insurance 717,003 686,680 96% 905,500 899,381 99% Services And Supplies 39,200 10,820 28% 256,200 226,300 88% Salaries And Benefits 49,803 45,459 91% 34,300 32,517 95% Insurance Premiums 515,000 557,706 108% 470,000 468,430 100% Insurance Claims 113,000 72,695 64% 145,000 172,134 119% Grand Total $ 1,784,952 $ 2,314,003 130% 2,080,066 $ $ 1,949,603 94% Other Related Information for Insurance Funds:
Recommended Reserve Levels: 65% of outstanding liabilities for Insurance ISF Funds Self Insured Retention Amount: $150,000 per occurrence
New Claims for Quarter: ↓ 4 (9 compared to 13 in same quarter of prior fiscal year) Claims Outstanding: ↑ 3 (38 compared to 35 in same quarter of prior fiscal year) 111%
171%
96%
86%
91%
99%
Employee Benefits
Worker's Compensation
Liability Insurance
Budget / YTD % of Budget - By Fund CY YTD % of Budget
PY YTD % of Budget
91%
271%
108%
64%
105%
86%
100%
119%
Worker's Comp Premiums
Worker's Comp Claims
Liability Premiums
Liability Claims
Budget / YTD % of Budget - For Selected Object Categories CY YTD % of Budget
PY YTD % of Budget
PGCC 9-17-25
City of Pacific Grove, California
Fund Numbers and Descriptions
General and Capital Project Funds
General Fund - Accounts for funds not accounted for and reported in another fund, including the following subfunds:
General Fund (01) Asset Seizure (22) Operating Donations (31) Small Business Assistance (48) Civic Center (14) Stillwell Children’s Pool (24) Vehicle Replacement (32) Reiko Koo Estate Donation (93) Drug Awareness (21) Youth Center Donation (25) Storm Water (44) Capital Projects (63) - Accounts for capital projects funded fully or in part by discretionary General Fund revenues.
Enterprise Funds
Cemetery (75) - Accounts for revenue from El Carmelo Cemetery site sales and the Little Chapel lease.
Local Water Project (74) - Accounts for the reclamation plant’s operation, treatment, and sale of recycled water.
Sewer (76,78) - Accounts for the City's sewer operations and maintenance (76) and provides funds for sewer lateral loans (78).
Golf Course (77) - Accounts for the concessionaire leases for the golf course, property improvement costs, and debt service.
Internal Service Funds
Employee Benefit (70) - Accumulates contributions from departments to pay for a variety of employee benefit costs.
Workers' Compensation (71) – Accumulates contributions from departments to pay for premiums, claims and administrative costs.
Liability Insurance (72) – Accumulates contributions from departments for claims, legal costs, and insurance premiums.
Trust (Permanent) Funds
Library (85) - Retains donations and bequeaths for the benefit of Library materials and collections.
Cemetery (86) - Accounts for perpetual expenses; and preservation of burial sites, grounds, paths, roadways and structures.
Yount (90) - Supports beautification of the City and minor improvements to education or recreational facilities.
Other Funds
Library / Poetry (7,11,40) – Accounts for funds to support the promotion of poetry and library improvements and equipment.
Museum (8) – Accounts for donations designated for improvements to the City’s museum of natural history.
Public Safety (12,42-45) – Accounts for funds in support of fire and police safety programs, SRO and 911 services and equipment.
Housing (15,28,36) – Accounts for affordable housing activities for residents and seniors and supports loans for affordable housing.
Streets (17-20,47) – Accounts for Gas and RMRA taxes, Measure X, and other grant funds for street maintenance and improvements.
Lighthouse (27) – Supports the operation at the Point Pinos Lighthouse including staffing, supplies, maintenance and improvements.
Community Development/CDBG (5,34,55) – Accounts for Community Development Block Grants and other department activities.
ARPA (84) – Accounts for funds received and expenditures from the American Rescue Plan Act provided by the federal government.
Downtown/Hospitality Districts (9-10) – Funds support the Chamber of Commerce and Convention/Visitor’s Bureau operations.
Cable Franchise / Other (6, Other) – Funds programming on public access television (PEG) and other donations and grants, including:
ASBS Grant (79) Yount Income (41) Chautauqua Hall (26) Coastal Conservancy Grant (69) Strong Disbursements (46) Mcindoo Donation (92) Operating Grants (30) Carillon Fund (03)
PGCC 9-17-25
Information related to major revenues categories is provided within this section. All graphs are in millions.
Property Taxes
Property tax revenues are received in December and April, with a minor amount in June. Proposition 13 sets FY 75-76 assessed values as the base year, with a growth rate limited to 2% for future years. The County Assessor also reappraises each real property parcel when there are purchases, construction, or other statutorily defined changes in ownership. Proposition 13 limits the property tax to 1% of each property’s full value, plus additional percentages for voter approved indebtedness. The City receives approximately sixteen cents of every dollar of property tax. Variations can result from timing differences, changes in assessed valuations, new developments and property sales during the year.
Sales Tax
Voters approved Measure A, a new 0.50% transaction and use tax. This increased the combined sales tax rate to 9.25% in October 2022. The General Fund portion of the City sales tax is comprised of a 1% Bradley-Burns statutory sales tax rate; and Measure U, a 1% transaction and use tax that was approved by voters in 2008. Restaurants and Hotels are the largest providers of sales tax to the City, followed by businesses in the building and construction category and from the County/State sales tax pool. Variances can occur annually resulting from timing differences, changes in car sales and online purchases, the two largest categories of its use tax, and from variances in tourism in the area.
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT)
TOT is a lodging tax received on a monthly basis that is collected on overnight rental accommodation stays of 30 consecutive days or less. In 2010, the City updated its municipal code and began collecting TOT on residential or short-term rental properties (STRS). In Fiscal Year 17/18, the City approved an ordinance to reduce the number of short-term rentals, effective April 30, 2019. A one-time lottery was also conducted that eliminated 51 STR licenses to meet the ordinance’s new density requirements. In November of 2018 voters approved Measure U, increasing the TOT rate to 12%. This increased tax was partially offset by Measure M, eliminating STRs outside of the Coastal and Commercial zones. Variances can be affected by timing differences and changes in room and hotel occupancy rates.
Other Taxes
The City imposes a utility users’ tax on residents and businesses that utilize water, gas, electricity, telephone, and cable services. This tax is assessed at a rate of 5% of the amount charged by the utility; and it is paid by the person consuming the service. The amount of revenues received is affected by timing differences and updates to the underlying rate structures or new development projects.
The City grants franchises to utilities to construct, maintain, lay infrastructure, or operate transportation on or over streets, alleys, lanes, or other public places within the City. New franchises or their renewal are levied a tax of at least 2% of gross annual receipts from franchises within the City.
The City charges a business license tax on entities doing business within the City. The tax rate is based upon gross receipts of the previous calendar year, with a minimum annual tax of $15 and a maximum of $3,000. The tax is payable on July 31st of each year along with a business improvement district assessment of 35% of the tax. The amounts can vary annually due to timing differences and periodic external audits and changes in business activity.
City of Pacific Grove
General Fund Revenue Overview
PGCC 9-17-25
Note that expenditures for most operating departments include amounts budgeted for personnel costs, including allocations for payment of the City’s unfunded pension liability, meeting and travel costs (except the City Attorney, Fire and Museum departments, operated on a contract basis), and internal service charges for support provided by other departments. In addition, most departments include allocations for utilities and contracted professional services. The departments’ budgets also include the following, with the overall variances for the departments being related to changes from year to year in costs incurred for these items and the items previously noted:
General Fund
City Council – Includes annual association memberships
City Attorney – Includes the legal retainer and contract legal services City Manager – Includes economic development and human resources programs and consultants Administrative Services – Includes contracted technology services, bank fees, leases for equipment and cloud based services, communication / phone services, software licenses, computer equipment / support and repairs Community Development – Includes contracted building, planning and dept legal professional services, bank fees, advertising for bidding, leases for equipment and cloud based services and software licenses Police – Includes dept legal services, communication / phone services, bank fees, safety and computer equipment / support, vehicle fuel and dept related debt service payments and fund transfers Fire – Includes contracted fire services, repairs, fire prevention services and dept related debt service / transfers Library – Includes new library books, leases for equipment and cloud based services and building repairs Museum – Includes the operation of the museum and building repairs Public Works – Includes maintenance of buildings, equipment, grounds and trees, street cleaning, maintenance of the fleet, leases for equipment and cloud based services, supplies and services and communication charges Recreation - Includes bank fees, advertising for recreation programs, building repair and operating supplies Enterprise / Internal Service Funds
Local Water Project – Funds equipment and its debt service payments. This fund may exceed budget by year end due to higher than expected utility costs
Cemetery – Includes its staffing and for operating supplies Sewer– Funds maintenance, equipment and vehicle repairs, equipment, supplies, capital and debt service Golf – Includes operations, improvements and for its debt service.
Employee Benefit – Includes contributions for various employee benefits Worker’s Compensation / Liability Insurance – Funds claims, administration and insurance premiums See additional details on capital expenditures for these funds in the City’s separate quarterly capital project report.
Other Funds
Several of the City’s funds will require mid-year adjustments due to the carryover of several capital projects from Fiscal Year 2023-24 to Fiscal Year 2024-25, as shown in detail on the City’s separate quarterly capital project report.
These include the following funds:
Museum (Fund 08) • Lighthouse (Fund 27)
Local Streets / Roads (Fund 17) • Road Maintenance RMRA (Fund 47) ARPA (Fund 84) • General Fund Capital Projects (Fund 63) RSTP / TAMC Transportation (Fund 20) • Sewer (Fund 76) City of Pacific Grove
Departmental Expenditure Overview / Variance Analysis
PGCC 9-17-25
Agenda No. 8 E
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Matthew Mogensen, City Manager
MEETING DATE: September 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Report on the August 25, 2025 City/PGUSD Joint Subcommittee Meeting CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Receive and File Report on the August 25, 2025 City/PGUSD Joint Subcommittee Meeting
DISCUSSION
On August 25, 2025, the City/PGUSD Joint Subcommittee of Mayor Smith, Mayor Pro Tem Amelio, President Hazen, Trustee Wachs Superintendent Adamson, Assistant Superintendent Jorn, Public Works Director/Deputy City Manager Gho, Chief Day, Deputy City Manager Halabi, and the City Manager held a Joint Subcommittee Meeting to discuss topics of interest to both entities and to form a better partnership.
Below is a summary of the Agenda items discussed, and feedback received.
A. Communications/Updates from PGUSD and City
Mayor Smith provided a short presentation update on City department activities (see Attachment No. 1).
B. Robert H. Down Elementary School Traffic (Pine Avenue) Public Works Director/Deputy City Manager Gho presented a working plan that is designed to create semi-permanent (stripping, glued down flexible bollards) student drop off/pick up lanes on Pine Avenue in front of the school (see Attachment No. 2). The concept plan is being presented to the City’s Traffic Safety Commission to begin the process of refining the safety improvements so they can be reviewed by Council and implemented. Comments regarding the plans were supportive, and included:
• Everyone commented they like the plan and want to see it implemented. • Set up works well in other places. Management will be key. • Need to consider ADA drop-off areas.
• Since this is a semi-permanent installation, we can refine it if the new traffic control measures don’t work as well as we want them to.
• PGUSD staff indicated they are trying to fill crossing guard position(s).
The intersection of Spruce and 13th was also discussed. All expressed appreciation for recent city efforts to improve the area with loading zone curb/red curb expansions and the installation of DG for a pedestrian path on 13 th between Spruce and Junipero. The only concern is no dedicated bike lane and the fact that the path ends where it intersects a single-family property to the east of south of the school PGCC 9-17-25
before you get to Junipero on 13th. City staff agreed to investigate the feasibility of working with the property owner to extend it, but it isn’t clear if it is City property or private property. Also, the matter of fire lane requirements will be investigated.
Other general discussion comment concerned the need for bike lanes for students to use to get to and from school.
C. Employee Housing Discussion
Trustee Wachs spoke about the topic of providing affordable housing opportunities to PGUSD employees. He has learned about public private partnerships to construct affordable housing and wanted to understand the possibilities in Pacific Grove. Both the City and PGUSD discussed some of the possibilities and constraints that we will need to evaluate and consider, but the conversation will continue. On the City’s work plan there is an action item to identify a favored site in the City to provide for an affordable housing project. The City will be having these discussions later this year or early next year.
D. Safety Collaboration with PGPD
Police Chief Day and Superintendent Adamson spoke on efforts to collaborate on safety matters at the schools. The Chief is not participating in the monthly PGUSD staff safety meetings and discussions on how to further increase measures is ongoing. Comments heard from the public on this matter included:
• It has been helpful for PGUSD parents to learn more about the legal operations of e-bikes and scooters.
• A forum for parents to hear about issues and speak with the Chief when incidents happen would be very helpful.
E. Safe Routes to School
Public Works Director/Deputy City Manager Gho discussed various Capital Improvement Projects that help foster safe routes to school. One specific project is a sidewalk infill project just approved and kicked off that will complete sidewalks on Congress from Lighthouse to Sinex and then on Sinex to the Jr. High on Forest. Another is the improvement along Sunset that are in design. Comments from Committee members were for us to consider additional steps working the TAMC to plan for additional safety amenities. Also discussed was the idea of adding bike lanes on streets not as heavily traveled as Sinex for example. Last was a concern that we need to enforce daylighting laws more aggressively.
F. Future Subcommittee Meetings
City staff and PGUSD staff have assessed and discussed the effectiveness of the Sub Committee over its first year. The discussions centered on how to further enhance the working relationship between the City and PGUSD. One observation is that the initial sub committee structure may be too formal or structured to foster the more collaborative, responsive and effective partnership each side wished to achieve. A more formal structure actually inhibits ongoing working collaborations as between staff to more quickly address challenges and concerns. The City Manager discussed recent action taken by the City Council to approve a less formal structure. This structure includes the appointment of the Mayor as the representative, staff to attend and support, and the committee to meet twice a year. Staff level meetings between the City and PGUSD will be held quarterly.
The less formal structure already has the support of President Hazen and Trustee Wachs and will be proposed to the full PGUSD Board of Trustees at an upcoming board meeting.
OPTIONS
Discuss and take an alternative action.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There are no financial impacts as a result of this item.
PGCC 9-17-25
FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.
PGCC 9-17-25
Agenda No. 8 F
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk/DEI Coordinator
MEETING DATE: September 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Monterey Salinas Transit Meeting Minutes for August 11, 2025 CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Receive the minutes.
Attachments
MST Minutes
PGCC 9-17-25
Agenda # 4-2
September 8, 2025 Meeting
MEETING OF THE MST BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Meeting Minutes
August 11, 2025
9:00 a.m. (Pacific)
Present: Mary Ann Carbone, Chair City of Sand City
Jeff Baron, Alternate City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
Kim Shirley City of Del Rey Oaks
Mike LeBarre City of King
Ed Smith City of Monterey
Joe Amelio City of Pacific Grove
Tony Barerra City of Salinas
Dave Pacheco City of Seaside
Fernando Cabrera City of Soledad
Luis Alejo County of Monterey
Absent: Lorraine Worthy, Vice Chair City of Gonzales
Ariana Rodriguez City of Greenfield
Liesbeth Visscher City of Marina
Counsel: Michael D. Laredo General Counsel, De Lay & Laredo Staff: Carl Sedoryk General Manager/CEO
Lisa Rheinheimer Deputy CEO
Kelly Halcon Chief Human Resources Officer
Michael Kohlman Chief Information Officer
Norman Tuitavuki Chief Operating Officer
Michelle Overmeyer Director of Planning and Innovation
Jeanette Alegar-Rocha Deputy Secretary/Clerk to the Board Andrea Williams Finance Manager
Beronica Carriedo C/S and Community Relations Supervisor Cristy Sugabo Mobility Manager
Christine Church Compliance Officer
Daniel Rodriguez Customer Service Representative
Danitza Lopez Human Resources Assistant
Ezequiel Rebollar IT System Engineer
Hector Suarez Payroll Specialist
Ikuyo Yoneda-Lopez Marketing and Communications Manager Jacob Huggins IT Specialist
PGCC 9-17-25
Jason Anderson Drug and Alcohol Coordinator
Jose Sanchez Barajas Assistant Planner
Kevin Allshouse Contract Services Manager
Luiza Hatlestad Mobility Specialist
Manny Villarreal IT Specialist
Marzette Henderson Transportation Manager
Melissa Valadez HR Supervisor
Michelle DiPretoro Inventory Specialist
Paul Lopez Facilities Manager
Rolando Munoz Mobility Specialist
Scott Taylor Information Technology Manager
Sonjé Dayries Civil Rights Officer
Susie Flores Grants Analyst
Ursulla Scardina Communications Specialist
Public: Jerry Benson 3
rd Wind Leadership LLC
Huei Villa Member of the Public
Andrew Brown Member of the Public
Michelle Adams City of Sand City
Jean Rasch City of Monterey
Christine Watson TAMC
Javier Gomez County of Monterey
1. CALL TO ORDER
1-1. Roll Call.
1-2. Pledge of Allegiance
Chair Carbone called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. Roll call was taken and a quorum established. Director Pacheco led the pledge of allegiance. 1-3. Highlights of the agenda. (Carl Sedoryk)
General Manager/CEO, Carl Sedoryk reviewed highlights of the Agenda.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Huei Villa commented that MST needs to look into more resources to support MST RIDES services in South County.
Andrew Brown commented on the need for additional services for South County, specifically to Hartnell College.
Director Alejo arrived at 9:08 a.m.
PGCC 9-17-25
Director Cabrera arrived at 9:10 a.m.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
These items will be approved by a single motion. Anyone may request that an item be discussed and considered separately.
3-1. Financial Reports – June 2025 (Lori Lee) (Page 7)
a) Accept Report of June 2025 Cash Flow
b) Approve June 2025 Disbursements
c) Accept report of June 2025 Treasury Transactions
3-2. Approve Minutes of the MST Board Meeting July 14, 2025. (Jeanette Alegar-Rocha) (Page 19)
3-3. Receive Draft Minutes of the RTA Board Meeting on July 14, 2025. (Jeanette Alegar-Rocha) (Page 25)
3-4. Adopt Resolution 2026-02 Approving Monterey-Salinas Transit District’s (MST) Updated Zero Emission Bus (ZEB) Rollout Plan for Submission to the California Air Resources Board (CARB) in Compliance with the Innovative Clean Transit (ICT) Regulation. (Norman Tuitavuki) (Page 29) 3-5. Approve Resolution 2026-03 Authorizing the General Manager/CEO or their Designee to Execute Grant Documents for Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program Funds (Susie Flores) (Page 61) End of Consent Agenda
There were no public comments on the Consent Agenda.
On a motion by Director Alejo and seconded by Director LeBarre, the Board unanimously approved the Consent Agenda with Directors Rodriguez, Visscher, and Worthy noted as absent.
4. RECOGNITIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
6. ACTION ITEMS
6-1. Strategic Planning, Workshop Part 2 of 2. (Carl Sedoryk / Jerry Benson) a) Review Pre-work from Workshop, Part 1,
b) Review Community Issues and Priorities,
PGCC 9-17-25
c) Breakout Discussion on Agency Purpose, Mission, and Values, d) Breakout Discussion on Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Challenges,
e) Breakout Discussion and Selection of Strategies and Goals, and f) Group Exercise on MST Vision.
Jerry Benson from 3rd Wind Leadership LLC facilitated the strategic planning workshop part 2. A draft strategic plan will be provided to the Board in the following months for further review and direction.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
8. REPORTS & INFORMATION ITEMS
The Board will receive and file these reports, which do not require action by the Board. 8-1. General Manager/CEO Monthly Report – June 2025 (Page 65) 8-2. Federal Legislative Advocacy Report – (Page 67)
8-3. State Legislative Advocacy Update – (Page 71)
8-4. Staff Trip Reports – (Pages 75-89)
8-5. Correspondence – None
9. BOARD REPORTS, COMMENTS, AND REFERRALS
9-1. Reports on Meetings Attended by Board Members at MST Expense. (AB 1234)
9-2. Board Member Comments and Announcements.
9-3. Board Member Referrals for Future Agendas.
10. ATTACHMENTS
10-1. The Monthly Report for June 2025 can be viewed online:
http://mst.org/about-mst/board-of-directors/board-meetings/
11. CLOSED SESSION
Comments from the public will not receive Board action. Comments must deal with matters on the Closed Session agenda and will be limited to three minutes.
None.
PGCC 9-17-25
12. ADJOURN
With no further business to discuss, Chair Carbone adjourned the meeting at 12:47 a.m. (Pacific).
Prepared by: ___________________Reviewed by: __________________ Jeanette Alegar-Rocha Carl G. Sedoryk
Deputy Secretary/Clerk to the Board General Manager/CEO PGCC 9-17-25
Agenda No. 9 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: George Fuerst, Environmental Program Manager
MEETING DATE: September 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Waste Hauler Franchise Agreement Matters Memorandum of Understanding with ReGen Monterey and Participating Member Agencies
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Memorandum of Understanding with ReGen Monterey and participating member agencies regarding assistance with franchise agreement matters; and
1. 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the MOU on behalf of the City of Pacific Grove.
DISCUSSION
The City of Pacific Grove, along with other participating member agencies of the Monterey Regional Waste Management District (ReGen Monterey), is entering into a regional effort to coordinate and prepare for the next generation of solid waste collection franchise agreements.
The participating agencies—Carmel-by-the-Sea, Del Rey Oaks, Marina, Pacific Grove, Sand City, Seaside, and Pebble Beach Community Services District—have determined that coordination in planning, negotiation, and administration of franchise agreement matters will improve efficiency, reduce duplicative costs, and strengthen negotiating positions.
The proposed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) establishes a framework for ReGen Monterey to manage coordination activities on behalf of the member agencies. These activities include:
• Supporting development of future franchise agreements through public engagement, solicitation document drafting, RFP process support, and negotiation assistance. • Coordinating with third-party consultants for surveys and technical support. • Facilitating Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Franchise Subcommittee meetings among agency staff.
• Providing cost-sharing and accounting to ensure equitable distribution of expenses.
The estimated cost for the multi-year Coordination Activities is $534,620, with equal cost-sharing among the seven participating agencies. Each agency, including the City of Pacific Grove, will contribute 14.29% (~$76,374) over the course of the project.
The TAC Subcommittee has reviewed the final draft MOU and recommended its approval by all member agencies. Participation in this MOU allows the City of Pacific Grove to leverage regional PGCC 9-17-25
member agencies. Participation in this MOU allows the City of Pacific Grove to leverage regional expertise and resources while ensuring representation in the planning and negotiations of future franchise agreements.
OPTIONS
Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
City of Pacific Grove’s proportionate share of the estimated cost is $76,374, representing 14.29% of total costs. Funding will be budgeted across approximately five fiscal years as invoices are received from ReGen Monterey. ReGen will invoice agencies annually based on actual costs incurred.
As provided in Section 5 of the MOU, no later than March 1 of each year, and at such other times as directed by the Parties, the TAC subcommittee shall meet to consider and, if deemed necessary, recommend modifications to Exhibit A of the MOU, including establishing a budget for services in each Fiscal Year.
ReGen will submit invoices to the Participating Member Agencies on an annual basis (or more frequently, if requested) to reimburse ReGen for the Participating Member Agency’s proportionate share of the actual cost of services incurred under this MOU in the invoice period. Participating Member Agencies shall endeavor to make payment within forty-five (45) days after receipt of the invoice. Historically, some franchise agreements have included stipulations that funds used for consulting services on franchise agreement matters were later to be reimbursed by the franchise holder.
FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.
Attachments
MOU Franchise Agreement Matters
Exhibit A Detailed Activites and Costs
Exhibit B Proportionate Shares and Costs
PGCC 9-17-25
1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE MONTEREY REGIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT DBA
REGEN MONTEREY AND ITS PARTICIPATING MEMBER AGENCIES
REGARDING ASSISTANCE WITH
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT MATTERS
This Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is made and entered into as of the date of the signatures set forth below by and between the MONTEREY REGIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT DBA REGEN MONTEREY (“ReGen Monterey,” or “ReGen”), a California Garbage and Refuse Disposal District, and its participating member agencies the cities of CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA, DEL REY OAKS, MARINA, PACIFIC GROVE, SAND CITY, and SEASIDE; and the PEBBLE BEACH COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (“Participating Member Agencies”). Collectively these entities shall be known herein as “Parties” or individually as a “Party.”
Recitals
A. The Participating Member Agencies have jurisdiction and authority to make adequate provisions for solid waste collection within their territories. The Participating Member Agencies have certain rights and interests related to administration and management of their existing franchise agreements, planning for future franchise agreements, and other matters within the Participating Member Agencies’ jurisdiction related to solid waste.
B. The Participating Member Agencies have determined that it is in their best interest to coordinate some of these activities. This coordination is being facilitated by ReGen Monterey’s Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) through a subcommittee comprised of staff from each Participating Member Agency and ReGen.
C. The Participating Member Agencies have further determined that ReGen Monterey has the expertise and resources necessary to support the Participating Member Agencies in their implementation of these activities and have now requested that ReGen incur costs to provide these activities.
D. The Participating Member Agencies have agreed to reimburse the ReGen Monterey for proportionate shares of certain costs incurred by the ReGen for these activities.
E. The form and content of this MOU have been presented to the TAC subcommittee, and the TAC subcommittee has recommended it for approval by the Parties.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by ReGen Monterey and the Participating Member Agencies, and of the promises contained in this MOU, the Parties agree as follows:
Section 1. Recitals: The recitals set forth above are incorporated into this MOU.
PGCC 9-17-25
2 Section 2. Purpose: The purpose of this MOU is to provide a structure for the Participating Member Agencies to authorize ReGen Monterey to perform certain activities to support the Participating Member Agencies’ in their administration and management of their existing franchise agreements, plan for future franchise agreements, and implement other matters within the Participating Member Agencies’ jurisdiction related to solid waste (“Coordination Activities”), and reimburse ReGen for such Coordination Activities it performs.
Section 3. Voluntary: This MOU is voluntarily entered into by the Parties for the purpose of coordinating the Coordination Activities.
Section 4. Term: This MOU shall become effective on the date of its full execution by the Parties and shall remain in effect until the services are completed, or it is earlier terminated in accordance with Section 8 of this Agreement.
Section 5. Scope of Work, Costs & Cost Sharing: The scope of work for the Coordination Activities, and associated costs, are set out in Exhibit A, entitled Detailed Activities and Costs, attached hereto and incorporated herein. Allocation of such costs to the Participating Member Agencies is set out in Exhibit B, entitled Participating Member Agencies’ Annual Proportionate Shares and Costs, attached hereto and incorporated herein.
No later than March 1 of each year, and at such other times as directed by the Parties, the TAC subcommittee shall meet to consider and, if deemed necessary, recommend modifications to Exhibits A and B; subject to approval of such modified Exhibits A and B by ReGen Monterey and each Participating Member Agency, this MOU shall be deemed amended to incorporate such modified Exhibits A and B.
Section 6. ReGen Monterey Agrees:
(a) ReGen staff will manage the Coordination Activities as identified in Exhibit A, which activities may include contracting with third party vendors when reasonably necessary and paying those vendors for contracted costs.
(b) Two times per year, on dates to be determined by the TAC subcommittee, ReGen will invoice Participating Member Agencies for each Participating Member Agency’s proportionate share of estimated costs as shown in Exhibit B with each invoice to be fifty percent (50%) of the Participating Member Agency’s estimated share of costs. (c) ReGen Monterey will maintain an accounting of activities and actual incurred costs and provide reconciliation of payments annually. Differences between estimated costs and actual incurred costs will result in either: 1) an adjustment made to the final annual payment for each Participating Member Agency, or 2) such cost difference shall be incorporated into the subsequent year cost allocation.
Section 7. The Participating Member Agencies Agree:
PGCC 9-17-25
3 (a) To reimburse ReGen Monterey for all expenses incurred by ReGen under this MOU in accordance with each Participating Member Agency’s proportionate share as shown on Exhibit B.
(b) To make a full-faith effort to cooperate with one another and with ReGen Monterey to achieve the purposes of this MOU by providing information, reviewing information in a timely manner, and informing their respective administration and governing bodies.
Section 8. Early Termination. Any Party may terminate its participation in this MOU effective at the conclusion of a phase of work (as described in Exhibit A) upon giving written notice to the other Parties. Within ten (10) days following a Party’s termination date, such party shall pay ReGen all charges then due and payable and shall pay when determined any additional charges in effect prior to their termination date, that shall later come due under the MOU, as provided in and subject to the limits set out in Exhibits A and B. The costs for the scope of work occurring after the effective date of any such early termination shall be reallocated among the remaining Participating Member Agencies and this MOU shall be deemed amended to incorporate such reallocation in Exhibit B.
Section 9. General Provisions.
(a) This MOU is binding and for the benefit of the respective successors, heirs, and assigns of each Party; provided however, no Participating Member Agency may assign its respective rights or obligations under this MOU without the prior written consent of ReGen Monterey.
(b) This MOU is governed by, interpreted under, and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The Parties agree that the jurisdiction and venue of any dispute between the Parties will be the Superior Court of California of the County of Monterey.
(c) If any provision of this MOU is determined by any court to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable to any extent, then the remainder of this MOU will not be affected, and this MOU will be construed as if the invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained in this MOU.
(d) Waiver by the any Party to this MOU of any term, condition, or covenant of this MOU will not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this MOU will not constitute a waiver of any other provision, nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this MOU. (e) This MOU may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which is an original but all of which taken together will constitute one and the same instrument, provided, however, that such counterparts have been delivered to all parties to this MOU. A signature delivered on any counterpart by electronic means will for all purposes be deemed to be an original signature to this MOU. The term “electronic means” means one that is executed by applying an electronic signature using technology mutually acceptable to the Parties.
PGCC 9-17-25
4 (f) All parties acknowledge they have been represented, or have had the opportunity to be represented, by counsel in the preparation and negotiation of this MOU. Accordingly, this MOU will be construed according to its fair language. Any ambiguities will be resolved in a collaborative manner by the Parties and must be rectified by amending this MOU. (g) This MOU supersedes and replaces all prior MOUs between the Parties hereto relating to the subject matter of this MOU.
(h) Nothing in this MOU may be construed as giving a Party the right or ability to bind the other Party and nothing in this MOU may be construed to create any joint liability with regard to, or as a result of, the activities undertaken by the other Party or its agents. All officers, directors, employees, representatives, and agents of a Party will remain the officers, directors, employees, representatives, and agents of that Party and will be subject to the laws, procedures, rules, and policies governing such Party.
(i) Nothing herein may be considered as creating any rights and/or obligations by any of the Parties to this MOU to any third parties, beyond those otherwise required and established by law.
(j) Each entity signing below warrants and represents that it has the power, authority and right to act on behalf of its Party and to bind its Party in accordance with this MOU. (k) From time to time, by mutual agreement, the Parties may reopen, in whole or in part, elements of this MOU, including modifying the member agencies participating in the MOU if approved by each Participating Member Agency. Except as provided in Section 5 above, this MOU may not be changed, modified, or amended, in whole or in part, except in a writing signed by an authorized representative of each Party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this MOU to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date of their respective signatures.
MONTEREY REGIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT dba REGEN MONTEREY By: ________________________ DATE: _______________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________
PGCC 9-17-25
5 CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
By: ________________________ DATE: _______________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________
PGCC 9-17-25
6 CITY OF DEL REY OAKS
By: ________________________ DATE: _______________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________
PGCC 9-17-25
7 CITY OF MARINA
By: ________________________ DATE: _______________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________
PGCC 9-17-25
8 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
By: ________________________ DATE: _______________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________
PGCC 9-17-25
9 SAND CITY
By: ________________________ DATE: _______________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________
PGCC 9-17-25
10 CITY OF SEASIDE
By: ________________________ DATE: _______________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________
PGCC 9-17-25
11 PEBBLE BEACH COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
By: ________________________ DATE: _______________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________
PGCC 9-17-25
12 EXHIBIT A
DETAILED ACTIVITIES & COSTS
Scope of Work
ReGen Monterey, through its own forces or through retention of third-party consultants, will perform the following Coordination Activities:
1. Support Participating Member Agencies’ Development of Next Generation of Franchise Agreements. The scope generally includes the following phases, and is described in more detail in the HF&H proposal dated March 26, 2025:
Phase 1. Public and Stakeholder Engagement
Phase 2. Solicitation Document Design and Drafting
Phase 3. RFP Process Support
Phase 4. Negotiations
2. Other Support Tasks as Assigned by the Participating Member Agencies. Such tasks may include retention of a third-party consultant to perform a survey(s).
Except as expressly provided above, all activities related to administration and management of Participating Member Agency franchise agreements and other tasks within the jurisdiction of the Participating Member Agency remain with the Participating Member Agency.
Estimated Costs
The not to exceed budget for the Coordination Activities is $534,620. The estimated fees per phase is summarized below, and is described in more detail in the HF&H proposal dated March 26, 2025:
Phase 1. $122,840 + $35,000 (third-party survey consultant) Phase 2. $102,310
Phase 3. $161,120
Phase 4. $108,500
The above is an estimate of the costs to provide the Coordination Activities per Phase; actual costs may vary based on level of effort required, change in assumptions, change in requested scope, significant and unanticipated issues or concerns, and other factors. Notwithstanding the foregoing, HF&H shall not incur time or expense that exceeds the specified not to exceed amount without the prior written approval of ReGen, which ReGen shall not grant without the prior written approval of the Parties.
PGCC 9-17-25
13 As provided in Section 5 of the MOU, no later than March 1 of each year, and at such other times as directed by the Parties, the TAC subcommittee shall meet to consider and, if deemed necessary, recommend modifications to this Exhibit A, including establishing a budget for services in each Fiscal Year.
ReGen will submit invoices to the Participating Member Agencies on an annual basis (or more frequently, if requested) to reimburse ReGen for the Participating Member Agency’s proportionate share of the actual cost of services incurred under this MOU in the invoice period.
Participating Member Agencies shall endeavor to make payment within forty-five (45) days after receipt of the invoice.
PGCC 9-17-25
14 EXHIBIT B
PARTICIPATING MEMBER AGENCIES’
PROPORTIONATE SHARES & COSTS
% of Total
Per Agency
Estimated Total
Cost
Carmel-by-the-Sea 14.29% $76,374
Del Rey Oaks 14.29% $76,374
Marina 14.29% $76,374
Pacific Grove 14.29% $76,374
Pebble Beach CSD 14.29% $76,374
Sand City 14.29% $76,374
Seaside 14.29% $76,374
TOTAL 100% $534,618
PGCC 9-17-25
12 EXHIBIT A
DETAILED ACTIVITIES & COSTS
Scope of Work
ReGen Monterey, through its own forces or through retention of third-party consultants, will perform the following Coordination Activities:
1. Support Participating Member Agencies’ Development of Next Generation of Franchise Agreements. The scope generally includes the following phases, and is described in more detail in the HF&H proposal dated March 26, 2025:
Phase 1. Public and Stakeholder Engagement
Phase 2. Solicitation Document Design and Drafting
Phase 3. RFP Process Support
Phase 4. Negotiations
2. Other Support Tasks as Assigned by the Participating Member Agencies. Such tasks may include retention of a third-party consultant to perform a survey(s).
Except as expressly provided above, all activities related to administration and management of Participating Member Agency franchise agreements and other tasks within the jurisdiction of the Participating Member Agency remain with the Participating Member Agency.
Estimated Costs
The not to exceed budget for the Coordination Activities is $534,620. The estimated fees per phase is summarized below, and is described in more detail in the HF&H proposal dated March 26, 2025:
Phase 1. $122,840 + $35,000 (third-party survey consultant) Phase 2. $102,310
Phase 3. $161,120
Phase 4. $108,500
The above is an estimate of the costs to provide the Coordination Activities per Phase; actual costs may vary based on level of effort required, change in assumptions, change in requested scope, significant and unanticipated issues or concerns, and other factors. Notwithstanding the foregoing, HF&H shall not incur time or expense that exceeds the specified not to exceed amount without the prior written approval of ReGen, which ReGen shall not grant without the prior written approval of the Parties.
PGCC 9-17-25
13 As provided in Section 5 of the MOU, no later than March 1 of each year, and at such other times as directed by the Parties, the TAC subcommittee shall meet to consider and, if deemed necessary, recommend modifications to this Exhibit A, including establishing a budget for services in each Fiscal Year.
ReGen will submit invoices to the Participating Member Agencies on an annual basis (or more frequently, if requested) to reimburse ReGen for the Participating Member Agency’s proportionate share of the actual cost of services incurred under this MOU in the invoice period.
Participating Member Agencies shall endeavor to make payment within forty-five (45) days after receipt of the invoice.
PGCC 9-17-25
14 EXHIBIT B
PARTICIPATING MEMBER AGENCIES’
PROPORTIONATE SHARES & COSTS
% of Total
Per Agency
Estimated Total
Cost
Carmel-by-the-Sea 14.29% $76,374
Del Rey Oaks 14.29% $76,374
Marina 14.29% $76,374
Pacific Grove 14.29% $76,374
Pebble Beach CSD 14.29% $76,374
Sand City 14.29% $76,374
Seaside 14.29% $76,374
TOTAL 100% $534,618
PGCC 9-17-25
Agenda No. 9 B
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk
MEETING DATE: September 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Designation of Official City Newspapers
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the City Manager to award the designation of 2025-2026 Official Newspaper to the Monterey Herald, the Monterey County Weekly, and the Carmel Pine Cone
DISCUSSION
Article 42 of the City Charter provides that Council shall advertise annually for contracts for official publications, ordinances, and other legal notices that are required to be published. The Council may accept more than one bid in any year, and during any such year, the City may utilize one or more of said Official Newspapers for any legal publications.
City staff sent out Requests for Bids (RFB) to three local newspapers: the Monterey Herald, the Monterey County Weekly, and the Carmel Pine Cone. The City Clerk received bids from the Monterey Herald, the Monterey County Weekly, and the Carmel Pine Cone.
It is recommended that, for reasons of business necessity, Council name all three as Official City Newspapers to provide staff flexibility for demographic reach, dependent upon the matter to be published. This has been the ongoing practice of the City. The Monterey Herald offers daily advertising, including Saturday and Sunday. The Monterey County Weekly is a widely-distributed publication that could be useful when prominence would be helpful, or when a back-up is desirable or appropriate. The Carmel Pine Cone could be used when the matter is of interest primarily to the Monterey Bay, or when a back-up is desirable or appropriate.
OPTIONS
Provide alternative direction.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Staff anticipates designating all three papers as Official City Newspapers will increase efficiency of the public notice process, and maintain the current level of expenditure for such services.
FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.
PGCC 9-17-25
Attachments
Proposed Resolution
Monterey Herald
Monterey Weekly
Pine Cone
PGCC 9-17-25
1 RESOLUTION NO. 25-XXX
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING OFFICIAL NEWSPAPERS OF THE
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
FACTS
1. Article 42 of the City Charter of the City of Pacific Grove requires the City to advertise bids for a contract or contracts for official publications, ordinances and other notices requiring publication.
2. The newspaper or newspapers to which such a contract or contracts are awarded shall be known as an “Official Newspaper of the City.”
3. The City distributed Requests for Bids (RFB) to three local newspapers to become an Official City Newspaper.
4. Newspapers submitting bids included the Monterey County Weekly, the Monterey Herald, and the Carmel Pine Cone.
5. The City Council may accept more than one bid in any year as the City may utilize one or more of said Official Newspapers for any legal publications.
6. The City Clerk is recommending, for reasons of business necessity, that three be named Official Newspapers of the City. The newspapers are the Monterey County Weekly, the Monterey Herald, and the Carmel Pine Cone.
7. The Action proposed by this Resolution does not constitute a “Project” as defined under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), CEQA Guideline section 15378.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE:
1. The Council determines each of the Facts set forth above is true and correct, and by this reference incorporates those Facts as an integral part of this Resolution.
2. The Council agrees that from time to time it is necessary and expeditious for staff to have the option and convenience of more than one Official City Newspaper.
3. The Official City Newspapers shall be the Monterey County Weekly, the Monterey Herald, and the Carmel Pine Cone and this shall become effective upon the date it is passed and adopted.
PGCC 9-17-25
2 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE this 17th of September 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
____________________________________
NICK SMITH, Mayor
ATTEST:
DATED:___________________________
__________________________________
SANDRA KANDELL, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
BRIAN A. PIERIK, City Attorney
PGCC 9-17-25
PGCC 9-17-25
PGCC 9-17-25
PGCC 9-17-25
PGCC 9-17-25
Agenda No. 10 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Anna Bornstein, Associate Planner
MEETING DATE: September 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes: August 12, 2025.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Receive the minutes.
Attachments
ARB Minutes 08.12.2025
PGCC 9-17-25
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Tuesday, August 12, 2025, 3:00 P.M.
Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA
1. CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL
Chair Brooks called the meeting to order at 3:24 pm. Present in the chamber: Chair Brooks, Vice Chair Byrne, and Member Boyle
ABSENT: Secretary Huff and Member Sublett
2. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
Upon a motion by Vice Chair Byrne and seconded by Member Boyle, the Board voted to approve the agenda.
Motion carried 3-0-2, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Chair Brooks, Vice Chair Byrne, Member Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Secretary Huff and Member Sublett
3. BOARD AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (City-Related Items Only) None
4. COUNCIL LIAISON ANNOUNCEMENTS
None
5. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
None
A. Written General Public Comment
None
CONSENT AGENDA
6. REPORTS FOR INFORMATION ONLY
None
7. REPORTS REQUIRING ACTION
A. Minutes of the May 13, 2025, Architectural Review Board Regular Meeting Reference: Anna Bornstein, Associate Planner
Recommended Action: Approve the Draft Minutes of the May 13, 2025, Architectural Review Board Regular Meeting.
PGCC 9-17-25
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Minutes of the June 10, 2025, Architectural Review Board Regular Meeting Reference: Anna Bornstein, Associate Planner
Recommended Action: Approve the minutes of the June 10, 2025, Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Board.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
C. Minutes of the July 8, 2025, Architectural Review Board Regular Meeting Reference: Anna Bornstein, Associate Planner
Recommended Action: Approve the minutes of the July 8, 2025, Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Board.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
ACTION: Upon a motion by Vice Chair Byrne, seconded by Member Boyle, the Board voted to approve the Consent Agenda
AYES: Chair Brooks, Vice Chair Byrne Member Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Secretary Huff and Member Sublett
REGULAR AGENDA
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Sign Permit (SP) 25-0100 for 1107 Forest Avenue (APN 006-713-030-000) Zoning District/General Plan Designation: Commercial - Forest Hill Coastal Zone: No
Historic Resources Inventory: No
CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class I, Existing Facilities
Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the Architectural Review Board approve Sign Permit 25-0100 subject to recommended findings, conditions of approval, and Class 1 Categorical Exemption (CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities).
Reference: Garrett McCown, Associate Planner
Garrett McCown, Associate Planner, provided the staff presentation.
ACTION: Upon a motion by Member Boyle, seconded by Vice Chair Byrne, the Board voted to approve Sign Permit 25-0100 subject to recommended findings, conditions of approval, and Class 1 Categorical Exemption (CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities).
Motion carried 3-0-2, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Chair Brooks, Member Boyle, Vice Chair Byrne
NOES: None
PGCC 9-17-25
ABSENT: Secretary Huff, Member Sublett
B. Architectural Permit (AP), Tree Permit with Development (TPD), and Coastal Development Permit (CDP) 24-0092 for 229 Asilomar Boulevard (APN 006-382-024-000)
Zoning District/General Plan Designation: R-1-B-4/Low Density Residential 2.0 Du/AC Coastal Zone: Yes
Historic Resources Inventory: No
CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class I, Existing Facilities
Recommended Action: Staff recommends the Architectural Review Board recommend the Planning Commission approve Architectural Permit (AP) and Tree Permit with Development (TPD) 24-0092, subject to the findings, recommended conditions, and Class 1 Categorical Exemption (CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities).
Reference: Garrett McCown, Associate Planner
Garrett McCown, Associate Planner, provided the staff presentation.
The applicant presentation was provided by architect Bill Mefford Public comment was received by Howard Perkins and Inge Lorentzen Daumer ACTION: Upon a motion by Vice Chair Byrne, seconded by Member Boyle, the Board voted to recommend that the Planning Commission approve Architectural Permit (AP) and Tree Permit with Development (TPD) 24-0092 subject to the recommended findings, standard conditions, and additional conditions for the proposed addition. These additional conditions include:
• The use of horizontal siding;
• Incorporation of a design detail to mitigate the vertical height; and • A window configuration on the upper floor that mirrors the lower floor.
And a Class 1 Categorical Exemption (CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 – Existing Facilities).
Motion carried 3-0-2, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Chair Brooks, Member Boyle, Vice Chair Byrne
NOES: None
ABSENT: Secretary Huff, Member Sublett
9. CONTINUED AND ONGOING BUSINESS
None
10. NEW BUSINESS
None
11. PRESENTATIONS
None
12. NEXT MEETING - September 9, 2025
13. ADJOURNMENT—4:03 p.m.
PGCC 9-17-25
Agenda No. 11 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian Pierik, City Attorney
MEETING DATE: September 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance Regarding Code Enforcement Adding Chapter 1.17, Amending Chapter 1.18, Repealing and Replacing Chapter 1.19, Repealing and Reserving Chapter 3.30, Amending Chapter 6.09, Amending Chapter 7.40, and Amending Chapter 9.17
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
RECOMMENDATION
Discuss Proposed Ordinance Regarding Code Enforcement Adding Chapter 1.17, Amending Chapter 1.18, Repealing and Replacing Chapter 1.19, Repealing and Reserving Chapter 3.30, Amending Chapter 6.09, Amending Chapter 7.40, and Amending Chapter 9.17. If the Council wishes to proceed with the Proposed Ordinance, then the following actions are recommended.
1. Request the City Attorney to read the title of the Ordinance Regarding Code Enforcement By Adding Chapter 1.17, and Amending Chapter 1.18, and Repealing and Replacing Chapter 1.19, Repealing and Reserving Chapter 3.30, Amending Chapter 6.09, Amending Chapter 7.40, and Amending Chapter 9.17.
2. 3. Motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance.
Introduce and hold the first reading of an Ordinance Regarding Code Enforcement Adding Chapter 1.17, and Amending Chapter 1.18, Repealing and Replacing Chapter 1.19, Repealing and Reserving Chapter 3.30, Amending Chapter 6.09, Amending Chapter 7.40, and Amending Chapter 9.17.
4. Direct that publication of the Ordinance will be satisfied by publication of a summary approved by the City Attorney.
5. DISCUSSION
City staff and the City Attorney’s office have reviewed the Pacific Grove Municipal Code (PGMC) for potential changes to City’s code enforcement procedures to enhance the efficiency of the City’s enforcement efforts, while providing due process and increasing cost recovery effectiveness.
Attachment 1 is the existing Chapter 1.18 (Motor Vehicle Parking Violation) Enforcement and Chapter 1.19 (Municipal Code and Ordinance Enforcement), along with existing Chapter 3.30 (Hearing Officer Panel), Chapter 6.09 (Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax), Chapter 7.40 (Short Term Rental License), and Chapter 9.17 (Reduction of Short-Lived Climate Pollutants), PGCC 9-17-25
(Short Term Rental License), and Chapter 9.17 (Reduction of Short-Lived Climate Pollutants), all of which will be affected by the proposed Ordinance.
As written, Chapter 3.30 establishes a seven-member panel of Pacific Grove residents, appointed by the Mayor and approved by the Council, to adjudicate administrative hearings.
This panel is designed to hear certain appeals as provided in Chapter 1.18 (parking citation appeals), Chapter 1.19 (code enforcement appeals), Chapter 7.40 (short-term rental transient-occupancy-tax related appeals), and Chapter 9.17 (short-lived climate pollutants enforcement appeals).
As written, Chapter 1.19 includes two distinct processes delineated separately in the administrative citation procedure (Sections 1.19.040–1.19.150) and the nuisance abatement procedure (Sections 1.19.150–1.19.290). These two processes would be more efficiently addressed if put into separate sections of the City Municipal Code.
The proposed Ordinance restructures the City’s code enforcement framework in two ways:
(1) Authorizes Hiring A Professional Hearing Officer: Under existing procedures, various appeals are heard by a hearing officer panel composed of community volunteers. The proposed Ordinance authorizes the City Manager to appoint a professional hearing officer to these appeals, replacing the current volunteer panel system. To accomplish this goal, the hearing officer panel provided for in Chapter 3.30 is eliminated, and related amendments are made in Chapter 1.18 (parking citation appeals), Chapter 1.19 (code enforcement appeals), Chapter 7.40 (short-term rental transient-occupancy-tax related appeals), and Chapter 9.17 (short-lived climate pollutants enforcement appeals).
(2) Reorganization of Code Enforcement Tools: The proposed Ordinance establishes a stand-alone administrative citation program with procedures for issuance, service, hearings, and cost recovery, in new Chapter 1.17. In addition, the proposed Ordinance repeals and replaces Chapter 1.19 with a comprehensive nuisance abatement program that defines public nuisances, authorizes compliance orders, establishes appeal procedures, provides for emergency abatements, and expands cost-recovery tools (liens, special assessments, civil actions, and attorney fee recovery).
Together, these amendments will enhance efficiency in the City’s enforcement efforts.
Attachment 2 is the proposed Ordinance including strikeouts where noted in the text.
Attachment 3 is the final version of the Ordinance accepting all proposed changes.
OPTIONS
1. Take no action
2. Take other action related to this Agenda item
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The proposed Ordinance does not have any fiscal impact. There will be financial impact in the future depending upon what code enforcement actions are taken by the City. Parking tickets are the most appealed citation that will need an outside hearing officer. The cost per appeal for a parking ticket is approximately $45 per appeal. Should the Council approve this ordinance staff will include annual funding in later budget adjustments.
PGCC 9-17-25
FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.
Attachments
Existing Chapter 1.18
Proposed Ordinance Re Code Enf Adding Ch. 1.17
Final Version of Proposed Ord Re Code Enf Adding Ch.1.17 PGCC 9-17-25
ATTACHMENT 1
Chapter 1.18
MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING VIOLATION ENFORCEMENT
Sections:
1.18.010 Purpose.
1.18.020 Definitions.
1.18.030 Service of citations, orders and notices.
1.18.040 Citation issuance.
1.18.050 Parking fines.
1.18.060 Delinquent parking violation.
1.18.070 Advance deposit hardship waiver.
1.18.080 Hearing request – Initial review.
1.18.090 Hearing request – Administrative hearing.
1.18.100 Administrative hearing officer selection.
1.18.110 Administrative hearing procedure.
1.18.120 Hearing officer’s decision.
1.18.130 Judicial review.
1.18.140 Collection of unpaid citations.
1.18.150 Preemption.
1.18.010 Purpose.
This chapter sets forth authority for enforcement of parking violations to preserve and protect the quality of life in the city of Pacific Grove. This chapter further establishes administrative hearing procedures to provide all individuals charged with a parking violation a forum in which the facts of their case may be reviewed fairly, a disposition rendered in a timely manner, and for collection of fines. [Ord. 16-023 § 2, 2016].
1.18.020 Definitions.
For the purpose of this chapter, the following words and phrases are defined:
(a) “Enforcement officer” shall mean and refer to any employee or agent of the city holding authority to enforce violations of this code or an ordinance. This shall include the chief of police, and any person designated as an enforcement officer by the chief of police. (b) “Park” shall mean to stand or leave standing any vehicle, whether occupied or not, otherwise than temporarily for the purpose of and while actually engaged in loading or unloading of passengers or materials.
(c) “Processing agency” shall mean and refer to the contracting party responsible for the processing of the notices of parking violations and notices of delinquent parking violations. [Ord. 16-023 § 2, 2016].
1.18.030 Service of citations, orders and notices.
All citations, orders and notices shall be served in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 1.12 PGMC and California Vehicle Code Section 40202. [Ord. 16-023 § 2, 2016].
1.18.040 Citation issuance.
Whenever an enforcement officer determines a violation of parking statute or ordinance has occurred, the enforcement officer shall be authorized to issue a parking citation to any person responsible for the violation in accord with California Vehicle Code Section 40202. [Ord. 16-023 § 2, 2016].
PGCC 9-17-25
1.18.050 Parking fines.
(a) The fines for each parking violation and administrative fees imposed pursuant to this chapter shall be set forth in the schedule of fines established by resolution of the city council. In the absence of a designated fine, the default fine for each violation shall be $50.00. (b) Any parking citation fine paid pursuant to this section shall be refunded in accordance with PGMC 1.18.120 if it is determined that, after a hearing, the person charged in the parking citation was not responsible for the violation or that there was no violation as charged in the parking citation. [Ord. 16-023 § 2, 2016].
1.18.060 Delinquent parking violation.
(a) The notice of delinquent violation shall be issued to the registered vehicle owner if the person fails to pay to the city the parking fine by the date fixed on the notice of parking violation. This notice shall be issued in accordance with PGMC 1.18.030. (b) Whenever the amount of any parking fine or penalty has not been satisfied within the due date of the delinquent notice or the parking citation has not been successfully challenged pursuant to this chapter, this obligation may be collected in accordance with PGMC 1.18.140. [Ord. 16-023 § 2, 2016].
1.18.070 Advance deposit hardship waiver.
Any person who intends to request a hearing to contest whether the parking violation occurred, or that he or she is the responsible party and who is financially unable to make the advance deposit of the fine as required in PGMC 1.18.050, may file a request for an advance deposit hardship waiver in accord with California Vehicle Code Section 40215(b). [Ord. 16-023 § 2, 2016].
1.18.080 Hearing request – Initial review.
(a) Any recipient of a notice of parking violation or a notice of delinquent parking violation may request an initial review of the notice by the city. A person may request an initial review of the notice of parking violation for a period of 21 calendar days from the issuance of a notice of parking violation or 14 calendar days from the mailing of a notice of delinquent parking violation. The request may be made by telephone, in writing, or in person in accord with California Vehicle Code Section 40215(a). There shall be no charge for this review. (b) If the city is satisfied that (1) the violation did not occur, (2) the registered owner was not responsible for the violation, or (3) extenuating circumstances make dismissal of the citation appropriate in the interest of justice, the city shall cancel the notice of parking violation or notice of delinquent parking violation. The city shall advise the processing agency, if any, of the cancellation.
(c) If the city upholds the notice of parking violation or notice of delinquent parking violation, the city shall include:
(1) A reason for that denial;
(2) Notification of the ability to request an administrative hearing; and (3) Notification of the procedure for waiving prepayment of the parking penalty based upon an inability to pay pursuant to PGMC 1.18.070.
(d) The city shall mail the results of the initial review to the person contesting the notice in accordance with PGMC 1.18.030. [Ord. 16-023 § 2, 2016].
1.18.090 Hearing request – Administrative hearing.
PGCC 9-17-25
(a) If the person is dissatisfied with the results of the initial review, the person may request an administrative hearing of the violation no later than 21 calendar days following the mailing of the results of the city’s initial review in accord with California Vehicle Code Section 40215(b). (b) The person requesting the hearing shall deposit the fine in advance, in accordance with PGMC 1.18.050, or shall receive in advance a deposit hardship waiver in accordance with PGMC 1.18.070.
(c) A hearing before the hearing officer shall be set for a date no later than 90 calendar days following the receipt of a request for an administrative hearing. The person requesting the hearing shall be notified of the time and place set for the hearing at least 10 days prior to the date of the hearing. The person requesting the hearing may request one continuance, not to exceed 21 calendar days.
(d) If the enforcement officer submits any additional written report concerning the citation to the hearing officer for consideration at the hearing, then a copy of this report shall be served on the person requesting the hearing at least five days prior to the date of the hearing. [Ord. 16-023 § 2, 2016].
1.18.100 Administrative hearing officer selection.
The presiding officer of the hearing officer panel shall, by random lot, designate one of the members of the hearing officer panel to be the hearing officer for each administrative hearing.
Should that hearing officer be disqualified for cause, or should that hearing officer otherwise be unable to conduct the hearing, the presiding officer shall, by random lot, designate a successor hearing officer from available members of the hearing officer panel. [Ord. 16-023 § 2, 2016].
1.18.110 Administrative hearing procedure.
The administrative hearing process shall consist of the following:
(a) The person requesting an administrative hearing shall indicate to the city whether the administrative hearing will be in writing or in person. (b) If the person requesting an administrative hearing is a minor, that person shall be permitted to appear at the hearing or admit responsibility for a parking violation without the necessity of the appointment of a guardian.
(c) The failure of any recipient of a parking citation to appear at the administrative hearing shall constitute a forfeiture of the fine and a failure to exhaust their administrative remedies. (d) The parking citation and any additional report submitted by the enforcement officer shall constitute prima facie evidence of the respective facts contained in those documents. (e) The enforcement officer who issued the notice of parking violation shall not be required to participate in the administrative hearing. No evidence shall be required other than the notice of parking violation or copy, and information received from the DMV identifying the registered owner of the vehicle. The enforcement officer may, but is not required to, submit additional report he or she deems necessary or appropriate.
(f) The hearing officer may question witnesses and request additional information from the enforcement officer or the recipient of the administrative citation prior to closing the hearing. [Ord. 16-023 § 2, 2016].
1.18.120 Hearing officer’s decision.
(a) After considering all of the testimony and evidence submitted at the hearing, the hearing officer shall issue a written decision to uphold or cancel the citation and shall list the reasons for that decision. The decision of the hearing officer shall be final for purposes of administrative review.
PGCC 9-17-25
(b) If the hearing officer determines that the citation should be upheld, then the fine amount on deposit with the city shall be retained by the city. If the fine has not been deposited, the hearing officer shall set forth in the decision a payment schedule for the fine. (c) If the hearing officer determines that the citation should be canceled and the fine was deposited with the city, then the city shall promptly refund the amount of the deposited fine, together with interest. If the fine has not been deposited, the hearing officer shall cancel the obligation to tender the fine.
(d) The hearing officer’s decision shall be personally served or served by first class mail. A copy of the decision shall be forwarded to all members of the hearing officer panel. [Ord. 16-023 § 2, 2016].
1.18.130 Judicial review.
(a) Any person aggrieved by an administrative hearing officer’s final decision may obtain review by filing an appeal to be heard by the superior court.
(b) California Vehicle Code Section 40230 shall be applicable so as to provide a 30-day limitation for judicial review of any parking enforcement decision. (c) A copy of the notice of parking violation or, if the citation was issued electronically, a true and correct abstract containing the information set forth in the notice of parking violation shall be admitted into evidence as prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein. (d) The person shall pay the filing fees as prescribed by the court. If the court finds in favor of the person, the amount of the filing fees shall be reimbursed to the person by the city. Any deposit of parking penalty shall be refunded by the city in accordance with the judgment of the court.
(e) If no notice of appeal of the hearing officer’s decision is filed within the period set forth in subsection (b) of this section, the decision shall be deemed final. [Ord. 16-023 § 2, 2016].
1.18.140 Collection of unpaid citations.
Whenever the amount of any administrative fine, penalty and/or administrative cost imposed by a hearing officer pursuant to this chapter has not been satisfied, the city shall commence collection proceedings. The city shall proceed with options set forth in the California Vehicle Code Section 40200 et seq. as may be amended for the collection of unpaid parking citations. [Ord. 16-023 § 2, 2016].
1.18.150 Preemption.
This chapter shall not be interpreted in any manner that conflicts with the laws or the Constitutions of the United States or of the state of California. [Ord. 16-023 § 2, 2016].
PGCC 9-17-25
Chapter 1.19
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT
Sections:
1.19.010 Purpose.
1.19.020 Administrative citation process overview.
1.19.030 Administrative compliance order process overview.
1.19.040 Administrative citations.
1.19.050 Definitions.
1.19.060 Service of citations, orders and notices.
1.19.070 Citation issuance.
1.19.080 Citation fines.
1.19.090 Hearing request.
1.19.100 Advance deposit hardship waiver.
1.19.110 Hearing officer selection.
1.19.120 Hearing procedure.
1.19.130 Hearing officer’s decision.
1.19.140 Judicial review.
1.19.150 Administrative compliance orders.
1.19.160 Compliance orders.
1.19.170 Hearing officer selection – Notice of hearing.
1.19.180 Compliance hearing.
1.19.190 Administrative order.
1.19.200 Administrative penalties.
1.19.210 Administrative costs.
1.19.220 Failure to comply with administrative order.
1.19.230 Judicial review.
1.19.240 Report of compliance after administrative order.
1.19.250 Compliance dispute.
1.19.260 Authority to impose lien/special assessment.
1.19.270 Lien/special assessment procedure and hearing.
1.19.280 Recordation and satisfaction of lien.
1.19.290 Recordation and satisfaction of special assessment.
1.19.010 Purpose.
City enforcement issues have become increasingly varied and complex. Alternative enforcement processes have been adopted by other public agencies as a means to address budget difficulties and resource shortages, and to streamline operations. Alternative enforcement processes minimize time delays that can result from increasingly crowded criminal and civil court dockets.
This chapter sets forth a variety of enforcement options to effectively and timely address code and ordinance enforcement matters in order to preserve and protect the quality of life in the neighborhoods and communities of the city of Pacific Grove. This chapter allows traditional criminal prosecution, civil action and nuisance abatement as enforcement. This chapter further establishes several administrative enforcement procedures. [Ord. 07-022 § 2, 2007].
PGCC 9-17-25
1.19.020 Administrative citation process overview.
Administrative citations generally address municipal code and ordinance violations that the city, in its sole discretion, deems to be minor or transient in nature. The city adopts the administration citation enforcement process, set forth in PGMC 1.19.040 through 1.19.150, inclusive, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53069.4, which provides for de novo review of administrative citations in court if a person wishes to challenge an administrative decision upholding an administrative citation. For example, and not by exclusion, administrative citations may be used to enforce provisions regulating signs, yard waste, false alarms, noise issues, vehicle parking, minor or nonrecurring violations of PGMC Title 18, Buildings and Construction, PGMC Title 23, Zoning, or similar matters.
An enforcement officer issues an administrative citation that lists the violation and the administrative fine amount and describes how to pay the fine or request a hearing to contest the citation. The administrative citation may be contested through an administrative hearing process.
The fine must be deposited in advance of the administrative hearing, but a procedure to waive the deposit is allowed for hardship. If not set forth in this code, the amount of the administrative citation fine is set by resolution. Penalties and interest shall be added for late payment of administrative fines.
The administrative citation process is set forth beginning at PGMC 1.19.040. [Ord. 07-022 § 3, 2007].
1.19.030 Administrative compliance order process overview.
Administrative compliance orders generally address municipal code and ordinance violations that the city, in its sole discretion, deems not suitable for the administrative citation process contemplated by PGMC 1.19.020. For example, and not by exclusion, administrative compliance orders may be used for serious, continuing or recurring violations of PGMC Title 18, Buildings and Construction, PGMC Title 23, Zoning, or similar matters.
An administrative compliance order is issued to a responsible party by a city enforcement officer. The compliance order sets forth a description of the observed violation(s), a description of what the responsible party is required to do to bring the property into compliance, and the date by which compliance must be achieved. The compliance order provides notice as to administrative penalties that shall accrue if compliance with the order is not achieved by the date listed on the order. The administrative compliance order may be contested through an administrative hearing process. The decision may contain an order to correct any violations determined to exist, together with an order to pay administrative penalties and costs.
The administrative compliance order process is set forth beginning at PGMC 1.19.150. [Ord. 07- 022 § 4, 2007].
1.19.040 Administrative citations.
(a) The administrative citation process provided for in this chapter shall be in addition to any other legal remedies, criminal or civil, which may be pursued by the city to address any violation of this code or an ordinance of the city of Pacific Grove. (b) The administrative citation process set forth in this chapter shall not apply to continuing violations this code, or to an ordinance of the city that pertains to building, plumbing, electrical, or other similar structural or zoning issues. [Ord. 07-022 § 5, 2007].
1.19.050 Definitions.
For purposes of this chapter, the term “enforcement officer” shall mean and refer to any employee or agent of the city holding authority to enforce violations of this code or an ordinance.
PGCC 9-17-25
This shall include the city manager, and any person designated as an enforcement officer by the city manager. [Ord. 07-022 § 6, 2007].
1.19.060 Service of citations, orders and notices.
All citations, orders and notices shall be served in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 1.12 PGMC. [Ord. 07-022 § 7, 2007].
1.19.070 Citation issuance.
(a) Whenever an enforcement officer determines that a violation of a provision has occurred, the enforcement officer shall be authorized to issue an administrative citation to any person responsible for the violation.
(b) Each administrative citation shall contain the following information:
(1) The date of the violation;
(2) The address or a definite description of the location where the violation occurred; (3) Reference to the provision of this code or ordinance that was violated and a description of the circumstances pertaining to the violation;
(4) The amount of the fine related to the violation determined in accord with this chapter; (5) A description of the fine payment process, including a statement of the time within which and the place to which the fine shall be paid;
(6) An order prohibiting continuation or repeated occurrence of the violation described in the administrative citation;
(7) A description of the administrative citation review process, including the time within which the citation may be contested and the place from which a request for hearing form to contest the citation may be obtained; and
(8) The name and signature of the citing enforcement officer. [Ord. 07-022 § 8, 2007].
1.19.080 Citation fines.
(a) The fines for each municipal code or ordinance violation imposed pursuant to this chapter shall be set forth in the schedule of fines established by resolution of the city council. In the absence of a designated fine, the default fine for each violation shall be $50.00 per day. (b) The schedule of fines shall specify an additional fine due for late payment of any fine if not paid in full on or before the date the payment of the fine is due. (c) The fine stated upon any duly issued administrative citation shall be paid to the city within 30 days from the date of service of the administrative citation. (d) Any administrative citation fine paid pursuant to this section shall be refunded in accordance with PGMC 1.19.130 if it is determined, after a hearing, that the person charged in the administrative citation was not responsible for the violation or that there was no violation as charged in the administrative citation.
(e) Payment of a fine under this chapter shall not excuse or discharge any continuation or repeated occurrence of the violation that is the subject of the administrative citation. (f) Any person who fails to pay to the city any fine imposed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter on or before the date that fine is due also shall be liable for the payment of any applicable late payment charges set forth in the schedule of fines. The city may collect any past due administrative citation fine or late payment charge by use of all available legal means. (g) Any failure to pay the city any fine imposed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter on or before the date that fine is due shall be deemed a violation of this section enforceable pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 1.16 PGMC. The city attorney shall be directed to collect fines that are due and payable under this section. [Ord. 07-022 § 9, 2007].
1.19.090 Hearing request.
PGCC 9-17-25
(a) Any recipient of an administrative citation may contest that there was a violation of this code or an ordinance of the city, or that he or she is the responsible party, by completing a request for hearing form and returning it to the city within 30 days from the date set forth on the administrative citation, together with an advance deposit of the fine or notice that a request for an advance deposit hardship waiver has been filed pursuant to PGMC 1.19.100. A request for hearing form may be obtained from the office of the city manager. (b) The person requesting the hearing shall be notified of the time and place set for the hearing at least 10 days prior to the date of the hearing.
(c) If the enforcement officer submits an additional written report concerning the administrative citation to the hearing officer for consideration at the hearing, then a copy of this report also shall be served on the person requesting the hearing at least five days prior to the date of the hearing. [Ord. 07-022 § 10, 2007].
1.19.100 Advance deposit hardship waiver.
(a) Any person who intends to request a hearing to contest whether a municipal code or ordinance violation occurred, or that he or she is the responsible party and who is financially unable to make the advance deposit of the fine as required in PGMC 1.19.080, may file a request for an advance deposit hardship waiver.
(b) The request shall be filed with the city manager on an advance deposit hardship waiver application form, available from the office of the city manager, within 10 days of the date of the administrative citation.
(c) The requirement to deposit the full amount of the fine as described in PGMC 1.19.080 shall be stayed unless or until the city manager makes a determination not to issue the advance deposit hardship waiver.
(d) The city manager may waive the requirement of an advance deposit set forth in PGMC 1.19.080 and issue the advance deposit hardship waiver only if the cited party submits to the city manager a sworn affidavit, together with any supporting documents or materials, demonstrating to the satisfaction of the city manager the person’s actual financial inability to deposit with the city the full amount of the fine in advance of the hearing. (e) If the city manager determines not to issue an advance deposit hardship waiver, the person shall remit the deposit to the city within 10 days of the date of that decision or 30 days from the date of the administrative citation, whichever is later. (f) The city manager shall issue a written determination listing the reasons for his or her determination to issue or not issue the advance deposit hardship waiver. The written determination of the city manager shall be final.
(g) The written determination of the city manager shall be served upon the person who filed the request for an advance deposit hardship waiver. This determination shall be subject to judicial review pursuant to Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the time limit set by PGMC 1.20.010 shall apply. [Ord. 07-022 § 11, 2007].
1.19.110 Hearing officer selection.
The presiding officer of the hearing officer panel shall, by random lot, designate one of the seven members of the hearing officer panel to be the hearing officer for each administrative citation hearing. Should that hearing officer be disqualified for cause, or should that hearing officer otherwise be unable to conduct the hearing, the presiding officer shall, by random lot, designate a successor hearing officer from available members of the hearing officer panel. [Ord. 07-022 § 12, 2007].
1.19.120 Hearing procedure.
PGCC 9-17-25
(a) No hearing to contest an administrative citation before a hearing officer shall be held unless the fine has been deposited in advance, in accordance with PGMC 1.19.080, or an advance deposit hardship waiver has been issued in accordance with PGMC 1.19.100. (b) A hearing before the hearing officer shall be set for a date that is not less than 15 days and not more than 60 days from the date that the request for hearing is filed in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. The hearing officer shall have sole discretion to grant any request for continuance of the hearing.
(c) At the hearing, the party contesting the administrative citation shall be given the opportunity to testify and to present evidence concerning the administrative citation. The city shall submit its report on the alleged violation, setting forth a detailed recommendation as to relevant findings and conclusions that flow from the facts presented and a recommended decision based upon those findings and conclusions. This report shall meet the standards for administrative findings set forth in Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Community v. County of Los Angeles, 11 Cal.3d 506 (1974).
(d) The failure of any recipient of an administrative citation to appear at the administrative citation hearing shall constitute a forfeiture of the fine and a failure to exhaust their administrative remedies.
(e) The administrative citation and any additional report submitted by the enforcement officer shall constitute prima facie evidence of the respective facts contained in those documents. (f) The hearing officer may question witnesses and/or request additional information from the enforcement officer or the recipient of the administrative citation prior to closing the hearing. [Ord. 07-022 § 13, 2007].
1.19.130 Hearing officer’s decision.
(a) After considering all of the testimony and evidence submitted at the hearing, the hearing officer shall issue a written decision to uphold or cancel the administrative citation and shall list the reasons for that decision. The decision of the hearing officer shall be final. (b) If the hearing officer determines that the administrative citation should be upheld, then the fine amount on deposit with the city shall be retained by the city. If the fine has not been deposited, the hearing officer shall set forth in the decision a payment schedule for the fine. (c) If the hearing officer determines that the administrative citation should be canceled and the fine was deposited with the city, then the city shall promptly refund the amount of the deposited fine, together with interest. If the fine has not been deposited, the hearing officer shall cancel the obligation to tender the fine.
(d) The recipient of the administrative citation shall be served with a copy of the hearing officer’s written decision. A copy of the decision shall be forwarded to all members of the hearing officer panel. [Ord. 07-022 § 14, 2007].
1.19.140 Judicial review.
Any person aggrieved by an administrative decision of a hearing officer on an administrative citation may obtain review of the administrative decision by filing a petition for review with the Superior Court in Monterey County in accordance with the timelines and provisions set forth in California Government Code Section 53069.4. [Ord. 07-022 § 15, 2007].
1.19.150 Administrative compliance orders.
(a) The administrative compliance order process provided for in this chapter shall be in addition to any other legal remedies, criminal or civil, which may be pursued by the city to address any violation of this code or an ordinance of the city.
PGCC 9-17-25
(b) Use of the administrative compliance order process shall be at the sole discretion of the city. [Ord. 07-022 § 16, 2007].
1.19.160 Compliance orders.
(a) Whenever an enforcement officer, as defined by PGMC 1.19.050, determines that a violation of any provision of this code or city ordinance has occurred, is occurring or exists, the enforcement officer may issue a written compliance order to any person responsible for the violation.
(b) A compliance order issued pursuant to this chapter shall contain the following information:
(1) The date of the violation;
(2) The address or description of the location where the violation occurred; (3) Reference to the provision of this code or ordinance that was violated and a description of the circumstances pertaining to the violation;
(4) The actions required to correct the violation;
(5) The time period after which administrative penalties will begin to accrue if compliance with the order has not been achieved;
(6) The penalty related to the violation, if compliance is not achieved; (7) The name and signature of the citing enforcement officer; and (8) Either a copy of this chapter or an explanation of the consequences of noncompliance with this chapter and a description of the hearing procedure and appeal process. [Ord. 07-022 § 17, 2007].
1.19.170 Hearing officer selection – Notice of hearing. (a) If the enforcement officer determines that each violation has been corrected within the time specified in the compliance order, no further action shall be taken. (b) If full compliance as to each violation is not achieved within the time specified in the compliance order, the enforcement officer shall advise the presiding officer of the hearing officer panel. The presiding officer of the hearing officer panel shall, by random lot, designate one member of that hearing officer panel to be the hearing officer for the compliance order hearing.
Should that hearing officer be unable to conduct the hearing, or should that hearing officer be disqualified for cause, the presiding officer shall, by random lot, designate a successor from that hearing officer panel.
(c) The hearing officer shall ensure that the notice provisions of Chapter 1.12 PGMC have been followed. Notice of the hearing shall be given at least 10 days prior to the date of the hearing.
The hearing officer shall have sole discretion to grant any request for continuance of the hearing. [Ord. 07-022 § 18, 2007].
1.19.180 Compliance hearing.
(a) At the place and time set forth in the notice of compliance hearing, the hearing officer shall conduct a hearing on the compliance order issued pursuant to PGMC 1.19.160, in accord with rules and procedures as may be promulgated by the hearing officer panel. (b) The hearing officer shall consider written or oral evidence in accord with rules and procedures set by the hearing officer panel pursuant to PGMC 3.30.060. Evidence regarding the alleged violation or compliance actions may be presented by any party, including the alleged violator, the owner or occupant of any real property affected by the alleged violation, and/or the city. The failure of any party to appear at the hearing shall constitute a failure to exhaust his or her administrative remedies.
(c) The compliance order and any additional report submitted by the enforcement officer shall constitute prima facie evidence of the respective facts contained in those documents. The report PGCC 9-17-25
on the alleged violation shall set forth a detailed recommendation as to relevant findings and conclusions that flow from the facts presented and a recommended decision based upon those findings and conclusions. This report shall meet the standards for administrative findings set forth in Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Community v. County of Los Angeles, 11 Cal.3d 506 (1974).
(d) The hearing officer may question witnesses and/or request additional information from the enforcement officer or any party prior to closing the hearing. (e) Within a reasonable time following the conclusion of the hearing, the hearing officer shall make findings and issue a determination, as to each alleged violation, regarding:
(1) The existence of the violation;
(2) The identity of each responsible party;
(3) The failure of the responsible party to take required corrective action within the required time period.
Findings shall be supported by substantial evidence received at the hearing. (f) If the hearing officer finds by a preponderance of the evidence that a violation has occurred and that the violation was not corrected within the time period specified in the compliance order, the hearing officer shall issue an administrative order in accord with PGMC 1.19.190. (g) If the hearing officer finds that no violation has occurred or that the violation was corrected within the time period specified in the compliance order, the hearing officer shall issue a finding as to those facts. [Ord. 07-022 § 19, 2007].
1.19.190 Administrative order.
If the hearing officer determines that a violation occurred which was not corrected within the time period specified in the compliance order, he or she shall issue an administrative order that imposes any or all of the following:
(a) An order to correct each violation, including a schedule for correction where appropriate; (b) Administrative penalties as provided in PGMC 1.19.200; and/or (c) Administrative costs as provided in PGMC 1.19.210. [Ord. 07-022 § 20, 2007].
1.19.200 Administrative penalties.
(a) The hearing officer shall be authorized to impose administrative penalties for the violation of any provision of this code or ordinance in an amount not to exceed a maximum of $2,500 per day for each continuing violation, except that the total administrative penalty shall not exceed $100,000 exclusive of administrative costs, interest and restitution for compliance reinspections, for any related series of violations.
(b) In determining the amount of the administrative penalty, the hearing officer may take any or all of the following factors into consideration:
(1) The duration of the violation;
(2) The frequency, recurrence and number of violations, related or unrelated, by the same violator;
(3) The seriousness of the violation;
(4) The effect the violation may have upon adjoining properties; (5) The good faith efforts of the violator to come into compliance; (6) The economic impact of the penalty on the violator; and/or (7) The impact of the violation on the community. [Ord. 07-022 § 21, 2007].
1.19.210 Administrative costs.
PGCC 9-17-25
(a) The hearing officer shall assess reasonable and necessary administrative costs against the violator when it finds that a violation has occurred, or that compliance has not been achieved within the time specified in the compliance order.
(b) The hearing officer shall assess reasonable and necessary administrative costs against the city when he or she finds that a violation has not occurred. (c) The administrative costs shall include reasonable and necessary costs incurred in connection with the matter before the hearing officer including, but not limited to, costs of investigation, costs incurred to prepare for the hearing and for the hearing itself, and costs for all reinspections necessary to enforce the compliance order.
(d) The hearing officer may waive the assessment of administrative costs against either party where unique circumstances are present, or in the interests of justice. [Ord. 07-022 § 22, 2007].
1.19.220 Failure to comply with administrative order.
(a) Any person who fails to comply with an administrative order issued in accord with this chapter, or to pay to the city any amount due pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, on or before the date that fine is due also shall be liable for the payment of any applicable late payment charges set forth in the schedule of fines. The city may collect any past due administrative citation fine or late payment charge by use of all available legal means, including recordation of a lien pursuant to PGMC 1.19.260 through 1.19.290.
(b) Any failure to comply with an administrative order issued in accord with this chapter, or to pay to the city any amount imposed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter on or before the date that fine is due, shall be deemed a violation of this section enforceable pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 1.16 PGMC.
(c) Any failure to pay the amount imposed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall also be enforced as:
(1) A personal obligation of the violator; and/or
(2) If the violation is in connection with real property, a lien upon the real property. The lien shall remain in effect until all of the administrative penalties, interest and administrative costs are paid in full. [Ord. 07-022 § 23, 2007].
1.19.230 Judicial review.
Any person aggrieved by an administrative order may obtain review of the administrative order in the superior court by filing with the court a petition for writ of mandate pursuant to PGMC 1.20.010. [Ord. 07-022 § 24, 2007].
1.19.240 Report of compliance after administrative order.
If the city manager determines that compliance has been achieved after a compliance order has been sustained by the hearing officer, the city manager shall file a report with the hearing officer panel indicating that compliance has been achieved. [Ord. 07-022 § 25, 2007].
1.19.250 Compliance dispute.
(a) If the city manager does not file a report pursuant to PGMC 1.19.240, any person who believes that compliance has been achieved may request a compliance hearing before the hearing officer by filing a request for a hearing with the presiding officer of the hearing panel, together with full payment of the compliance dispute hearing fee set by the council. (b) A hearing on the compliance dispute shall be noticed in accordance with Chapter 1.12 PGMC.
(c) The hearing officer shall determine if compliance has been achieved and, if so, when it was achieved. [Ord. 07-022 § 26, 2007].
1.19.260 Authority to impose lien/special assessment.
PGCC 9-17-25
Whenever the amount of an administrative fine, penalty and/or administrative cost imposed by a hearing officer pursuant to this chapter in connection with real property has not been satisfied in full within 90 days and/or has not been successfully challenged by a timely writ of mandate, this obligation shall constitute a lien or, in the alternative, a special assessment against the real property on which the violation occurred. [Ord. 17-020 § 2, 2017; Ord. 07-022 § 27, 2007].
1.19.270 Lien/special assessment procedure and hearing. (a) Upon determination by the city manager or his designee that any administrative fine, penalty and/or administrative cost imposed by a hearing officer pursuant to this chapter in connection with real property has not been satisfied in full within 90 days and/or has not been successfully challenged by a timely writ of mandate, the city council may adopt a resolution confirming imposition of the debt and approving filing a lien or special assessment against the subject real property.
(b) The resolution shall state the amounts due and owing, the name of the agency imposing the lien/special assessment (city of Pacific Grove), the date of the order or other notice describing the property violation or nuisance in question, the street address, legal description and assessor’s parcel number of the subject property, and the name and address of the recorded owner of the property.
(c) Any person whose real property is subject to a lien/special assessment pursuant to this chapter may file a written protest with the city clerk and/or may object to assessment of the lien/special assessment orally at the city council meeting. (d) Each written protest must contain a description of the property in which the protesting party is interested and the grounds for each protest.
(e) The city council, after the hearing and after considering each protest, shall adopt a resolution confirming, discharging or modifying the amount of the lien/special assessment. [Ord. 17-020 § 2, 2017; Ord. 07-022 § 28, 2007].
1.19.280 Recordation and satisfaction of lien.
(a) Thirty days following adoption of a resolution by the city council imposing a lien, the city clerk shall file the same as a judgment lien in the office of the county recorder of Monterey County, California.
(b) The lien may carry additional administrative charges as set forth by resolution of the city council. Interest at the legal rate per year shall accrue on the principal amount of the lien until satisfied pursuant to law. A lien pursuant to this chapter may be foreclosed by an action brought by the city for a money judgment.
(c) A copy of the adopted resolution shall be served on the property owner, along with notice to the property owner that a lien in the amounts stated in the resolution will be filed against the subject property in the Monterey County recorder’s office. (d) The notice set forth in subsection (c) of this section shall be served in accordance with Chapter 1.12 PGMC. If the owner of record cannot be found after diligent search, the notice may be served by posting a copy in a conspicuous place upon the property for a period of 10 days and publication in a newspaper of general circulation published in Monterey County. (e) Once payment in full is received by the city for outstanding penalties, costs, and accrued interest, the city manager shall either record a notice of satisfaction or provide the property owner or financial institution with a notice of satisfaction so this notice may be recorded with the office of the county recorder. Such notice of satisfaction shall cancel the city’s lien. [Ord. 17-020 § 2, 2017; Ord. 07-022 § 29, 2007].
PGCC 9-17-25
1.19.290 Recordation and satisfaction of special assessment. (a) The resolution adopted by the city council under this section shall be entitled to recordation. (b) A copy of the adopted resolution shall be served on the property owner, along with notice that the property may be sold after three years by the tax collector for unpaid delinquent assessments. Such notice shall be served by certified mail to the property owner. If the owner of record cannot be found after diligent search, the notice may be served by posting a copy in a conspicuous place upon the property for a period of 10 days and publication in a newspaper of general circulation published in Monterey County. The tax collector’s power of sale shall not be affected by the failure of the property owner to receive notice. (c) The assessment may be collected at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary municipal taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in case of delinquency as provided for ordinary municipal taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection and enforcement of municipal taxes shall be applicable to the special assessment. However, if any real property to which the assessment relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrance for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of the taxes would become delinquent, then the assessment shall not result in a lien against the real property but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. (d) Interest at the legal rate per year shall accrue on the principal amount of the assessment until satisfied pursuant to law.
(e) The city may, subject to the requirements applicable to the sale of property pursuant to Section 3691 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, conduct a sale of vacant residential developed property for which the payment of the assessment is delinquent. (f) Once payment in full is received by the city for outstanding penalties, costs, and accrued interest, the city manager shall provide written notice to the tax collector that the special assessment has been paid in full and should no longer be imposed against the subject property.
Such written notice shall cancel the city’s special assessment. [Ord. 17-020 § 2, 2017; Ord. 07- 022 § 30, 2007].
PGCC 9-17-25
Chapter 3.30
HEARING OFFICER PANEL
Sections:
3.30.010 Hearing officer panel membership.
3.30.020 Hearing officer panel terms of office.
3.30.030 Hearing officer panel removal.
3.30.040 Presiding officer.
3.30.050 Meetings.
3.30.060 Rules and procedures.
3.30.010 Hearing officer panel membership.
A hearing officer panel for the city of Pacific Grove is created. The hearing officer panel shall consist of seven residents of the city, appointed by the mayor and approved by the council.
The appointment, performance evaluation, compensation and/or benefits provided to any member of the hearing officer panel shall not be directly or indirectly conditioned upon the amount of administrative citation fines upheld by the hearing officer. [Ord. 07-022 § 32, 2007].
3.30.020 Hearing officer panel terms of office.
Each appointee to the hearing officer panel shall serve for a two-year term; provided, however, that four members of the panel shall be appointed to terms ending on January 31st in evennumbered years, and three members of the panel shall be appointed to terms ending on January 31st in odd-numbered years. Any vacancy on the hearing officer panel shall be filled for the unexpired remainder of that term. [Ord. 07-022 § 33, 2007].
3.30.030 Hearing officer panel removal.
Any member of the hearing officer panel may be removed prior to the expiration of his or her term by a majority vote of the council, in the council’s discretion. [Ord. 07-022 § 34, 2007].
3.30.040 Presiding officer.
The mayor shall select one member of the hearing officer panel to be the presiding officer. The presiding officer shall serve in that capacity at the pleasure of the mayor. Should the presiding officer be absent or unavailable, a majority of the remaining members of the hearing officer panel shall appoint an acting presiding officer to perform the duties of the presiding officer. [Ord. 07-022 § 35, 2007].
3.30.050 Meetings.
The presiding officer shall act as the chair of the hearing officer panel at any meeting of that panel. All meetings of the panel shall comply with the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act. [Ord. 07-022 § 36, 2007].
3.30.060 Rules and procedures.
(a) The hearing officer panel may establish and modify, taking into consideration the advice of the city attorney, rules and procedures that shall govern the conduct of any hearing to review an administrative citation or any hearing to review an administrative compliance order. All such rules and procedures shall be provided to any participant in that hearing. (b) An affirmative vote of a majority of the total members of the hearing officer panel shall be required for any action by the panel. [Ord. 07-022 § 37, 2007].
PGCC 9-17-25
Chapter 6.09
UNIFORM TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX
6.09.080 Failure to collect and report tax – Determination of tax by tax administrator.
If any operator shall fail or refuse to collect said tax and to make, within the time provided in this chapter, any report and remittance of said tax or any portion thereof required by this chapter, the tax administrator shall proceed in such manner as he or she may deem best to obtain facts and information on which to base his or her estimate of the tax due. As soon as the tax administrator shall procure such facts and information as he or she is able to obtain upon which to base the assessment of any tax imposed by this chapter and payable by any operator who has failed or refused to collect the same and to make such report and remittance, he or she shall proceed to determine and assess against such operator the tax, interest and penalties provided for by this chapter. In case such determination is made, the tax administrator shall give a notice of the amount so assessed by serving it personally or by depositing it in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the operator so assessed at his or her last known place of address. Such operator may within 10 days after the serving or mailing of such notice, make application in writing to the tax administrator for a hearing on the amount assessed. If application by the operator for a hearing is not made within the time prescribed, the tax, interest and penalties, if any, determined by the tax administrator shall become final and conclusive and immediately due and payable. If such application is made, the tax administrator shall give not less than five days’ written notice in the manner prescribed herein to the operator to show cause at a time and place fixed in said notice why said amount specified therein should not be fixed for such tax, interest and penalties. At such hearing, the operator may appear and offer evidence why such specified tax, interest and penalties should not be so fixed. After such hearing the tax administrator shall determine the proper tax to be remitted and shall thereafter give written notice to the person in the manner prescribed herein of such determination and the amount of such tax, interest and penalties. The amount determined to be due shall be payable after 15 days unless an appeal is taken as provided in PGMC 6.09.090. [Ord. 484 N.S., 1965].
6.09.090 Appeal.
Any operator aggrieved by any decision of the tax administrator with respect to the amount of such tax, interest and penalties, if any, may appeal to the council by filing a notice of appeal with the city clerk within 15 days of the serving or mailing of the determination of tax due. The council shall fix a time and place for hearing such appeal, and the city clerk shall give notice in writing to such operator at his or her last known place of address. The findings of the council shall be final and conclusive and shall be served upon the appellant in the manner prescribed in PGMC 6.09.080 for service of notice of hearing. Any amount found to be due shall be immediately due and payable upon the service of notice. [Ord. 484 N.S., 1965].
PGCC 9-17-25
Chapter 7.40
SHORT-TERM RENTAL LICENSE
7.40.160 Appeal of tax.
Any person aggrieved by any decision of the city with respect to the amount of the transient occupancy tax or fees associated thereto may appeal to the administrative enforcement hearing officer panel under Chapter 1.19 PGMC by filing a notice of appeal with the city clerk or delegate within 15 days after receipt of written notice from the city. The hearing officer assigned by the panel shall thereupon fix a time and place for hearing such appeal. The city manager or delegate shall give notice to such person of the time and place of hearing in compliance with Chapter 1.12 PGMC. The hearing officer shall have authority to determine all questions raised by such appeal; provided, however, that no such determination shall conflict with any substantive provision of this chapter. [Ord. 17-024 § 2, 2017].
PGCC 9-17-25
Chapter 9.17
REDUCTION OF SHORT-LIVED CLIMATE POLLUTANTS
9.17.130 Enforcement.
(a) Beginning January 1, 2024, if the city determines that a generator, responsible party, selfhauler, hauler, tier one or tier two commercial edible food generator, food recovery organization, food recovery service, or other entity is not in compliance with this chapter, it shall document the noncompliance or violation, issue a notice of violation, and take enforcement action pursuant to this section, as needed.
(b) Violation of any of the provisions of this chapter shall constitute an infraction or misdemeanor and shall be punishable as set forth in Chapter 1.16 PGMC. (c) Notwithstanding any other legal remedy, violation of any of the provisions of this chapter may be enforced pursuant to Chapter 1.19 PGMC.
(d) Notwithstanding any other legal remedy, violation of any of the provisions of this chapter shall constitute a public nuisance and shall be subject to abatement, injunction, or other civil remedy as appropriate.
(e) Notice of Violation.
(1) City enforcement officials or their designee will monitor compliance randomly and through compliance reviews, route reviews, investigation of complaints, and an inspection program (that may include remote monitoring).
(2) For incidences of prohibited container contaminants found in containers, city will issue a notice of contamination to any generator or responsible party found to have prohibited container contaminants in a container. Such notice will be provided via a cart tag or other communication immediately upon identification of the prohibited container contaminants or within 10 business days after determining that a violation has occurred. If the city observes prohibited container contaminants in a responsible party’s containers on more than three consecutive occasions, the city may assess contamination processing fees or contamination penalties on the generator. (3) City shall issue a notice of violation requiring compliance within a maximum of 60 days of issuance of the notice. Notices shall be sent to “Owner” at the official address of the owner maintained by the tax collector for the city or if no such address is available, to the owner at the address of the multifamily premises or commercial premises or to the responsible party for the collection services, depending upon available information. (f) Penalty Amounts for Types of Violations. Penalties may be assessed for violations as provided in Chapters 1.16 and/or 1.19 PGMC. Any person causing or permitting a violation of this code shall be regarded as committing a separate offense on each day that the violation occurs or continues.
(g) Appeals Process. Any persons aggrieved by any decision of the city with respect to uncorrected violation may appeal to the administrative enforcement hearing officer panel under Chapter 1.19 PGMC by filing a notice of appeal with the city clerk or delegate within 15 days after receipt of written notice from the city. The hearing officer assigned by the panel shall thereupon fix a time and place for hearing such appeal. The city manager or delegate shall give notice to such person of the time and place of hearing in compliance with Chapter 1.12 PGMC.
The hearing officer shall have authority to determine all questions raised by such appeal; provided, however, that no such determination shall conflict with any substantive provision of this chapter. [Ord. 21-031 § 2, 2021].
PGCC 9-17-25