CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Wednesday, May 20, 2026, 6:00 P.M.
Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA APPEARING REMOTELY:
Councilmember Chaps Poduri
676 N. Michigan Avenue
Chicago, IL 60611
The Council will not begin consideration of any item on this agenda later than 10:00 p.m. unless such consideration is approved. Any items on this agenda not considered this evening will be continued to a future meeting.
Copies of the agenda packet are available for review at the Pacific Grove Library, in the Finance Department, and electronically at www.cityofpacificgrove.org/agendas. The most effective method of communication with the City Council is by sending an email to [email protected]. In order to allow the City Council adequate time to review communication related to an agenda item, it is recommended that the communication be sent no later than 9:00 AM on the day prior to the City Council meeting. Public comments received through this email address by noon on the day of the meeting will be posted with the corresponding agenda item.
Under the Brown Act, public comment for matters on the agenda must relate to that agenda item and public comments for matters not on the agenda must relate to the subject matter jurisdiction of this legislative body. This is a warning that if a member of the public attending this meeting remotely or in-person violates the Brown Act by failing to comply with these requirements of the Brown Act, then the Mayor or Chair may request that speaker be muted. If a member of the public attending this meeting in-person engages in disruptive behavior that disturbs the orderly conduct of the meeting, they may be removed from the meeting after a warning, pursuant to Council Policy 000-17.
PACIFIC GROVE COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE CONDUCTED IN PERSON AT CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER AND VIRTUALLY.
PLEASE NOTE THE MEETING WILL PROCEED AS NORMAL EVEN IF THERE ARE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES ACCESSING ZOOM.
THE CITY WILL DO ITS BEST TO RESOLVE ANY TECHNICAL ISSUES AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.
THE PUBLIC MAY ALSO VIEW THE MEETING ON PENINSULA CHANNEL 25.
JOIN THE ZOOM WEBINAR TO PARTICIPATE LIVE AT:
https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/Zoom_CC
Please click here for directions to dial into the meeting audio.
PGCC 5-20-26
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Councilmember Rau
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
2. PRESENTATIONS
A. Meritorious Conduct Award to Justin Harrell PG 9
Reference: Mayor Nick Smith and Fire Chief Pat Moore
Recommended Action: Receive the presentation of a Meritorious Conduct Award to Justin Harrell. This award shall be awarded to citizens of the community who display courage in assisting the Fire Department and/or their fellow citizens. This award will be presented by the City Council and the Fire Chief.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
3. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (City-Related Items Only) A. Other
4. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
General Public Comment must deal with matters subject to the jurisdiction of the City and the Council that are not on the Regular Agenda. This is the appropriate place to comment as to items on the Consent Agenda, only if you do not wish to have the item pulled for individual consideration by the Council. Comments from the public will be limited to three minutes and will not receive Council action. Comments regarding items on the Regular Agenda shall be heard prior to Council’s consideration of such items at the time such items are called.
Whenever possible, written correspondence should be submitted to the Council in advance of the meeting, to provide adequate time for its consideration.
A. Written General Public Comment
CONSENT AGENDA
The Consent Agenda deals with routine and non-controversial matters, and may include action on resolutions, ordinances, or other public hearings for which testimony is not anticipated. The vote on the Consent Agenda shall apply to each item that has not been removed. Any member of Council, staff, or the public may remove an item from the Consent Agenda for individual consideration. When items are pulled for discussion, they will be automatically placed at the end of their respective section within the Regular Agenda. One motion shall be made to adopt all non-removed items on the Consent Agenda.
PGCC 5-20-26
5. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 11. Unfinished and Ongoing Business A. Minutes of the May 6, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting PG 11 Reference: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk
Recommended Action: Approve the minutes.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
6. RESOLUTIONS
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 11. Unfinished and Ongoing Business or 12. New Business
7. ORDINANCES
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 10. Public Hearings
8. REPORTS – INFORMATION ONLY
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 11. Unfinished and Ongoing Business or 12. New Business A. Monterey-Salinas Transmit Minutes for April 6, 2026 PG 18 Reference: Joe Amelio, Mayor Pro Tem
Recommended Action: Receive the minutes.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Notification of the extension of Permit No. AP-TPD-UP 19-0363 for the American Tin Cannery Hotel Project located at 109/125 Ocean View Boulevard and 124 Central Avenue.
Reference: Jon Biggs, Community Development Director PG 25 Recommended Action: Receive notification of the extension of Permit No. AP-TPD-UP 19-0363 for the American Tin Cannery Hotel Project located at 109/125 Ocean View Boulevard and 124 Central Avenue.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
C. Check Register, Purchase Order Report, and Financial Status Report - April 2026 PG 27 Reference: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Recommended Action:
1. Receive the Check Register, Purchase Order Report, and Financial Status Report.
2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
PGCC 5-20-26
D. FY26 Q3 Quarterly Investment Report PG 50
Reference: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Recommended Action:
1. Receive the report.
2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
9. REPORTS – REQUIRING ACTION
Items pulled from this section will be placed under 11. Unfinished and Ongoing Business or 12. New Business A. 2026 9-1-1 Service Agreement with the County of Monterey PG 69 Reference: Casey J. Day, Chief of Police
Recommended Action:
1. Accept and file the report; and
Direct the City Manager to execute the Agreement for 911 Emergency Communications Services.
2. CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Letter of Support for AB 1942 (Bauer - Kahan) - E-Bike: Registration & License Plates Reference: Casey J. Day, Chief of Police PG 126
Recommended Action:
Approve Issuing a Letter of Support for AB 1942 (Bauer - Kahan) with Amendments, E-Bikes: Registration & License Plates
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
C. Oppose Assembly Bill 1383 (McKinnor): Public Employees’ Retirement Benefits PG 132 Reference: Chaps Poduri, Councilmember
Recommended Action: Approve a formal position of "Oppose" for Assembly Bill 1383 and authorize the Mayor to sign and transmit an opposition letter.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
10. MEETING MINUTES OF COMMISSIONS, BOARDS, AND COMMITTEES Items pulled from this section will be placed under 12. New Business A. Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes: February 10, 2026 PG 135 Reference: Anna Bornstein, Associate Planner
Recommended Action:
Receive the minutes.
PGCC 5-20-26
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Task Force on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Meeting Minutes; Apirl 13, 2026 PG 140 Reference: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk
Recommended Action: Receive the minutes.
CEQA: Proposed Ordinance not subject to CEQA based on Guideline Sections: 15060(c)(3) and 15378; 15060(c)(2); 15061(b)(3); and 150308
REGULAR AGENDA
11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
For public hearings involving a quasi-judicial determination by the Council, the proponent of an item may be given 10 minutes to speak and others in support of the proponent’s position may be given three minutes each. A designated spokesperson for opposition to the item may be given 10 minutes to speak and all others in opposition may be given three minutes each. Very brief rebuttal and surrebuttal may be allowed in the sole discretion of the Council. In public hearings not involving a quasi-judicial determination by the Council, all persons may be given three minutes to speak on the matter.
A. Ordinance Amending the Salary Classification Schedule to add Information Technology Analyst Classification PG 143
Reference: Leticia Livian, Human Resources Director
Recommended Action:
Introduce and hold a first reading of an ordinance to amend the salary classification schedule to add Information Technology Classification; and
1. Direct that a summary of a proposed ordinance be published as approved by the City Attorney.
2. CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Downtown Business Improvement District (BID) Program for Fiscal Year 2026-27 PG 150 Reference: Lori Frati, Finance Manager
Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council:
Hold a public hearing to determine that majority protest to the annual assessment were not received.
1. Adopt the resolution approving the annual report, approving the Program of Expenditures, assessing the levy, and appointing an advisory board for the Downtown Business Improvement District for Fiscal Year 2026-27
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement allowing the Pacific Grove Chamber of Commerce to administer the BID budget.
3. 4. Take an alternative action.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
PGCC 5-20-26
C. Hospitality Improvement District (HID) program for Fiscal Year 2026-27 PG 171 Reference: Lori Frati, Finance Manager
Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council:
Hold a public hearing to determine that a majority protest to the annual assessment was not received.
1. Adopt the Resolution approving the annual report and program of expenditures, assessing the levy and appointing an Advisory Board for the Hospitality Improvement District for Fiscal Year 2026-27.
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement allowing the Pacific Grove Chamber of Commerce to administer the HID budget.
3. 4. Take and alternative action.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
D. Master Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2026-27 PG 196
Reference: Lori Frati, Finance Manager
Recommended Action:
Approve Resolution adopting the City's FY 2026-27 Master Fee Schedule, including the annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustment and other changes as directed by Council
1. 2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
E. Appeal of Architectural Permit (AP), Historic Preservation Permit, and Coastal Development Permit (CDP) 25-0186 for 689 Mermaid Avenue (APN 006-085-001-000) Reference: Garrett McCown, Associate Planner PG 238
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends the City Council reverse the action of the Planning Commission and approve Architectural Permit (AP), Historic Preservation Permit (HPP), and Coastal Development Permit (CDP) 25-0186, subject to the findings, recommended conditions, and Class 1 and 31 Categorical Exemptions (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301, Existing Facilities, and 15331, Historical Resource Restoration and Rehabilitation).
CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines 15331, Historical Resources Restoration/Rehabilitation
12. UNFINISHED AND ONGOING BUSINESS
A. Re-Consider the Draft City Council Policy Entitled Vacancy in Elective Office and PG 321 Appointment.
Reference: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk
Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution approving the City Council Policy entitled Vacancy in Elective Office and Appointment.
PGCC 5-20-26
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Ownership Analysis and Control Analysis for Cannabis Business License Applications PG 328 Reference: Joyce Halabi, Deputy City Manager
Recommended Action:
1. Receive the Ownership and Control Analysis
2. Provide staff direction on next steps
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
C. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy PG 358
Reference: Joyce Halabi, Deputy City Manager
Recommended Action:
1. Adopt a Resolution approving the Artificial Intelligence Policy, Council Policy 200-7
2. Alternatively, take other action related to this item.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
13. NEW BUSINESS
A. Fiscal Year 2026/27 Capital Improvements Program PG 373 Reference: Daniel Gho, Public Works Director/Deputy City Manager Recommended Action:
Received and approve the update, including the two additional projects, to the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), and
1. Approve the commitment of $750,000 from General Fund reserves for the Pier at Lover Point to act as a match for grant opportunities, and
2. 3. Approve a resolution adopting the FY 2026/27 Senate Bill 1 Project List, or
4. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
14. FULL PRESENTATIONS
A. Update on Monterey Regional Airport PG 388
Reference: Chris Morello, Monterey Regional Airport Executive Director Recommended Action: Receive the presentation.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
PGCC 5-20-26
15. CLOSED SESSION
ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE OF ADA COMPLIANCE: Pursuant to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (Codified At 42 United States Code Section 12101 and 28 Code of Federal Regulations Part 35), and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the City of Pacific Grove does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, disability, age or sexual orientation in the provision of any services, programs, or activities. The City of Pacific Grove does not discriminate against persons with disabilities. City Hall is an accessible facility. A limited number of assisted listening devices will be available at this meeting. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting or provide the requested agenda format.
PGCC 5-20-26
Agenda No. 2 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk/DEI Coordinator
MEETING DATE: May 20, 2026
SUBJECT: Meritorious Conduct Award to Justin Harrell
CEQA: {CEQA}
RECOMMENDATION
Receive the presentation of a Meritorious Conduct Award to Justin Harrell. This award shall be awarded to citizens of the community who display courage in assisting the Fire Department and/or their fellow citizens. This award will be presented by the City Council and the Fire Chief.
Attachments
Meritorious Award
PGCC 5-20-26
PGCC 5-20-26
Agenda No. 5 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk/DEI Coordinator
MEETING DATE: May 20, 2026
SUBJECT: Minutes of the May 6, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting CEQA: {CEQA}
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the minutes.
Attachments
Draft Minutes 5-6-26
PGCC 5-20-26
1 DRAFT MEETING MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, May 6, 2026, 6:00 P.M.
Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA JOIN THE ZOOM WEBINAR TO PARTICIPATE LIVE AT:
https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/Zoom_CC
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Smith called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Present in Chamber Mayor Smith, Councilmembers Garfield, McDonnell, Poduri, and Rau. Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Amelio.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Smith led the pledge of allegiance.
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Upon motion by Councilmember Rau and seconded by Councilmember Poduri, Council voted 5-0-1, Mayor Pro Tem Amelio absent, to approve the Regular Meeting Agenda.
2. PRESENTATIONS
3. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (City-Related Items Only) A. Council and staff made general announcements.
4. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
General public comment received from Christi Metzner, Bill Kampe, and Nina Beety.
A. Written General Public Comment
CONSENT AGENDA
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Rau and seconded by Councilmember Garfield, Council voted 5-0-1, Mayor Pro Tem Amelio absent, to approve the Consent Agenda (as modified).
5. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
A. Minutes of the April 15, 2026 Special and Regular Meetings Action: Approved the minutes.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
6. RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution of Intention to Levy the Annual Assessment for the Downtown Business Improvement District (BID)
DRAFT PGCC 5-20-26
2 Action:
1. Approved Resolution of Intention to Levy an Assessment for the Downtown Business Improvement District for Fiscal Year 2026-27 (Resolution No. 26-008).
2. Approved a public hearing for May 20, 2026 to hear protests and determine whether to levy the assessment.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Resolution of Intention to Levy the Annual Assessment for the Hospitality Improvement District (HID)
Action:
1. Approved Resolution of Intention to Levy an Assessment for the Hospitality Improvement District for Fiscal Year 2026-27 (Resolution No. 26-009).
2. Approved a public hearing for May 20, 2026 to hear protests and determine whether to levy the assessment.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
7. ORDINANCES
A. Second Reading of Ordinance Adopting Amendments to the R-3, C-1, C-2, and R-3-M Zoning Regulations
Action: Held second reading and adopted Ordinance No. 26-009 Amending Chapters 23.24, 23.32, and 23.52 of Title 23, Zoning, of the Pacific Grove Municipal Code.
CEQA: Environmental Impact Report
B. Second Reading of an Ordinance Approving Concession Lease Agreement with Fortunate Fork, LLC
Action: Held second reading and adopted Ordinance No. 26-010 approving a concession lease agreement with Fortunate Fork, LLC.
CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class I, Existing Facilities
8. REPORTS – INFORMATION ONLY
9. REPORTS – REQUIRING ACTION
A. Appointments to the Museum Board
Action: Approved the following appointments to the Museum Board: Mary Albert, Robert Burdick, and Jessica Swanson.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Regional Surface Transportation Program Allocation Funding Agreement Action: Authorized an agreement with the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) for appropriation of $123,590.57 of Fair Share Regional Surface Transportation Program funds.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality DRAFT PGCC 5-20-26
3 Act Guidelines Section 15378
C. Renewal of Microsoft Enterprise Software License Agreement Action: Authorized a 3-year renewal agreement with Dell / Microsoft for Microsoft Enterprise Software Licensing through Riverside County Master Agreement, in the amount of approximately $26,000 annually.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
D. Emission-Reducing Replacement of City Owned Natural Gas Water Heaters, Funded by PG&E Government/K-12 Program Incentive Action: Authorized the City Manager, or designee, to enter into an agreement with Willdan, an authorized implementer of PG&E Programs, for the replacement of natural gas storage tank water heaters with emission-reducing heat pump water heaters or on-demand natural gas water heaters.
CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15302, Class 2, Replacement or Reconstruction of Existing Structures and Facilities E. Extension with Topes Tree Service Inc. for Tree Maintenance Services in Public Right of Way
Action: Authorized Fiscal Year 2026/27 extension with Topes Tree Service Inc. to provide Tree Maintenance Services for trees in the public right-of-way and on City-owned properties in an amount not to exceed $250,000.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
F. Assembly Bill 2254 / Coastal Monarchs Protection Act Action: Approved the submission of a letter in support of Assembly Bill 2254.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
10. MEETING MINUTES OF COMMISSIONS, BOARDS, AND
COMMITTEES
A. Task Force on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Meeting Minutes: 1/12, 2/9, and 3/9/2026
Action: Received the minutes.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
REGULAR AGENDA
11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Consider an Appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of Coastal Development Permit 26-0011, Crespi Pond Vegetation Management Project (portion of APN 007-011-006) and Adoption of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Mayor Smith opened the public hearing.
No ex parte communications were reported.
DRAFT PGCC 5-20-26
4 Planner Joe Sidor presented to Council.
Appellant Anthony Ciani was provided 10 minutes to present to Council.
Applicant Public Works Director provided comments to Council.
Public comment received from Inge Lorentzen Daumer.
Appellant Anthony Ciani was provided 1 minute for rebuttal.
Mayor Smith closed the public hearing.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Rau and seconded by Councilmember Garfield, Council voted 5-0-1, Mayor Pro Tem Amelio absent, to deny the appeal, adopt the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074, approve a 5-Year Coastal Development Permit (CDP 26-0011) subject to the findings and conditions of approval, and adopt the associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (Resolution No. 26-010).
CEQA: Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration
12. UNFINISHED AND ONGOING BUSINESS
A. Process for Submitting Applications to Fill Vacant Council Seat No public comment received.
Action: Upon motion by Mayor Smith and seconded by Councilmember Rau, Council voted 4-1-1, Councilmember Poduri dissenting and Mayor Pro Tem Amelio absent, to
1. Hold the selection to fill the vacant Council seat on June 3, 2026;
2. Direct the City Clerk to post the application on the City Council’s webpage and make it available upon request;
3. Advise potential applicants to submit applications to the City Clerk commencing May 7, 2026 and closing on May 22, 2026 at close of business; and
4. Direct the City Clerk to post redacted applications on the City Council’s webpage within 24-48 hours of receipt.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Consider Draft City Council Policy 000-XXX Vacancy in Elective Office and Appointment
No public comment received.
Action: Upon motion by Mayor Smith and seconded by Councilmember Poduri, Council voted to revise the policy with the following additions and revisions:
• Adding “fairly” to “All stages of the nomination process must be conducted fairly without bias…
• Revised: Each applicant will have 5-10 minutes, at the Mayor’s discretion, DRAFT PGCC 5-20-26
5 to present a statement… The time will be set at the posting of the agenda. • Added after Public Comment: The matter will be returned to Council for dialogue and Council’s submitted questions to the applicants. • Revised: The Mayor will request that each Councilmember clearly state for the record their top applicant.
• Added: If one applicant receives four nominations, a vote shall be conducted to ratify the top applicant.
Motion carried 5-0-1, with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Smith, Councilmembers Garfield, McDonnell, Poduri, and Rau.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tem Amelio.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
13. NEW BUSINESS
A. Receive Presentation and Consider Approving ReGen Monterey's Technical Advisory Committee's Subgroup Recommendation on the 2030 Collection Franchise Planning Process
Public comment received from Inge Lorentzen Daumer, Craig Girard, Zoe Shoats, Tim Morris, Emily Hanson, Manny Gouveia, and Nick Becker.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Rau and seconded by Councilmember McDonnell, Council voted 5-0-1, Mayor Pro Tem Amelio absent, to adopt a Resolution initiating a Competitive Request for Proposal Process for future Solid Waste, Recycling, and Organic Collection Services; and Adopt related Process Integrity Policy.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
B. Installation of a 4-way Stop at the Intersection of Congress, Central and Lighthouse Avenue
Public comment received from Sally Moore, Nocholas Mourlam, and Inge Lorentzen Daumer.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Rau and seconded by Mayor Smith, Council voted 5-0-1, Mayor Pro Amelio absent, to receive report and authorize staff to install a 4- way stop at the intersection of Lighthouse, Congress and Central Avenue and all associated actions consistent with installation of a 4-way stop including recommendations for signs, markings and striping.
CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class I, Existing Facilities
14. FULL PRESENTATIONS
DRAFT PGCC 5-20-26
6 15. CLOSED SESSION
ADJOURNMENT
Council adjourned the regular meeting at 8:37 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Sandra Kandell
City Clerk
Approved by Mayor: _______________________________________Date________________ Attest by City Manager: ____________________________________Date________________ DRAFT PGCC 5-20-26
Agenda No. 8 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joe Amelio, Mayor Pro Tem
MEETING DATE: May 20, 2026
SUBJECT: Monterey-Salinas Transmit Minutes for April 6, 2026 CEQA: {CEQA}
RECOMMENDATION
Receive the minutes.
Attachments
MST Minutes
PGCC 5-20-26
Agenda # 3-2
May 11, 2026 Meeting
MEETING OF THE MST BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Meeting Minutes
April 6, 2026
10:00 a.m. (Pacific)
JURISDICTION BOARDMEMBER
(Alternate)
JAN 2026FEB 2026MAR 2026APR 2026MAY 2026JUN 2026JUL 2026AUG 2026SEP 2026OCT 2026NOV 2026DEC 2026 Carmel-by-theSeaBob Delves
(J. Baron)
P A A P
Del Rey Oaks Kim Shirley
(J. Hallock)
P P P P
Gonzales Lorraine Worthey
Vice Chair
(M. Orozco)
A P P P
Greenfield Ariana Rodriguez
(R. White)
P P P P
King City Mike LeBarre
(C. DeLeon)
P A A P
Marina Liesbeth Visscher
(B. Delgado)
P P P P
Monterey Ed Smith
(J. Rasch)
P P R P
Pacific Grove Joe Amelio
(C. Poduri)
P P P P
Sand City Mary Ann Carbone
Chair
(K. Scudder)
A P P P
Salinas Tony Barrera
(G. De La Rosa)
P P P P
Seaside Dave Pacheco
(A. Garcia-Arrazola)
P P P P
Soledad Fernando Cabrera
(E. Banuelos)
P R P P
County of
Monterey
Luis Alejo
(W. Askew)
P P P P
PGCC 5-20-26
P=Present
A=Absent
R=Remote
P(A)= Present Alternate
PGCC 5-20-26
Counsel: Michael Laredo, Remote General Counsel, De Lay & Laredo Staff: Carl Sedoryk General Manager/CEO
Lisa Rheinheimer Deputy CEO
Kelly Halcon Chief Human Resources Officer
Norman Tuitavuki, Chief Operating Officer
Jeanette Alegar-Rocha Deputy Secretary/Clerk to the Board Antonio Sanchez Coach Operator
Beronica Carriedo C/S & Community Relations Supervisor
Cristy Sugabo Mobility Manager
Diana Lopez Customer Service Representative
Emma Patel Planning Manager
Ezequiel Rebollar Systems Engineer
Hardy Culp Coach Operator
Ikuyo Yoneda-Lopez Marketing & Communications Manager
Jacob Newman Operations Specialist
Jack Perrin Assistant Planner
Kevin Allhouse Contract Transportation Manager
Jarred Augusta Risk and Safety Manager
Martin Mendoza Communications Systems Specialist
Marzette Henderson Transportation Manager
Omarr Wilson Operations Supervisor
Paul Lopez Facilities Manager
Rolando Munoz Mobility Specialist
Ruben Gomez Mobility Coordinator
Scott Taylor IT Manager
Sonjé Dayries Civil Rights Officer
Steven Bruno Purchasing Agent
Susie Flores Grants Analyst
Tizianno Minelli Senior Operations Supervisor
Ursulla Scardina Communications Specialist
Vince Dang Project Management Coordinator
Public: Javier Gomez County of Monterey
Jasmine Mejia-Cortes County of Monterey
Christina Watson TAMC
Brian Cox Trans Dev
1. CALL TO ORDER
1-1. Roll Call.
1-2. Pledge of Allegiance
PGCC 5-20-26
Chair Carbone called the meeting to order at 10:03 a.m. Roll call was taken and a quorum established. Director LeBarre led the pledge of allegiance. 1-3. Highlights of the agenda. (Carl Sedoryk)
General Manager/CEO, Carl Sedoryk reviewed highlights of the Agenda.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA
There were no public comments.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
These items will be approved by a single motion. Anyone may request that an item be discussed and considered separately.
3-1. Financial Reports – February 2026 (Lori Lee)
a) Accept Report of February 2026 Cash Flow
b) Approve February 2026 Disbursements, and
c) Accept report of February 2026 Treasury Transactions 3-2. Approve Minutes of the MST Board Meeting March 9, 2026. (Jeanette Alegar-Rocha)
3-3. Receive Draft Minutes of the MST Board Administrative Performance Committee Meeting on March 9, 2026. (Jeanette Alegar-Rocha) 3-4. Receive Draft Minutes of the Measure Q Oversight Committee Meeting March 16, 2026. (Jeanette Alegar-Rocha)
3-5. Adopt Resolution 2026-16 Recognizing Tiziano “Tim” Minelli, Antonio Sanchez, Hardy Culp, Omarr Wilson, and Martin Mendoza as Employees of the Month for April 2026. (Carl Sedoryk)
3-6. Receive Letter from Measure Q Oversight Committee Reporting that FY 2025 Funds were Spent on Eligible Expenses. (Lisa Rheinheimer) 3-7. Authorize the General Manager/CEO or Their Designee to Purchase of Seven Toyota Camry Hybrid Sedans at the Lowest Price/Best Options Available at the Time of Purchase in an Amount not to Exceed $222,000. (Norman Tuitavuki)
3-8. Authorize the General Manager/CEO or their Designee to Execute an Amendment with Kimley-Horn for Additional Design Services During Construction for the SURF! Busway and Bus Rapid Transit Project in an Amount not to Exceed $317,011. (Lisa Rheinheimer)
PGCC 5-20-26
3-9. Authorize the General Manager/CEO or their Designee to Amend the Purchase of Up to 90 Sportworks Apex +3 Bike Backs and Mounting Deployment Kits for an Additional $33,077 to Account for Shipping and Taxes for a Total Amount Not to Exceed $244,229. (Norman Tuitavuki) 3-10. Appoint Serena Solis to the Measure Q Oversight Committee to a 3-year Term. (Carl Sedoryk)
End of Consent Agenda
There were no public comments on the Consent Agenda.
On a motion by Director Alejo and seconded by Director Smith, the Board approved all items on the consent agenda.
4. RECOGNITIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
4-1. April 2026 MST Employees of the Month – (Carl Sedoryk/Norman Tuitavuki)
a) Tiziano “Tim” Minelli, Operations Superintendent
b) Antonio Sanchez, Coach Operator
c) Hardy Culp, Coach Operator
d) Omarr Wilson, Operations Supervisor
e) Martin Mendoza, Communications Systems Specialist
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
6. ACTION ITEMS
6-1. Adopt the Revised MST Zero-Tolerance Anti-Drug Use and Alcohol Misuse Policy. (Sonjé Dayries)
There were no public comments.
On a motion by Director Barrera and seconded by Director Amelio the Board approved item 6-1.
7. REPORTS & INFORMATION ITEMS
The Board will receive and file these reports, which do not require action by the Board. 7-1. General Manager/CEO Monthly Report – February 2026 7-2. Federal Legislative Advocacy Report
PGCC 5-20-26
7-3. State Legislative Advocacy Report
7-4. Staff Trip Reports
7-5. Correspondence None
8. BOARD REPORTS, COMMENTS, AND REFERRALS
8-1. Reports on Meetings Attended by Board Members at MST Expense. (AB 1234)
8-2. Board Member Comments and Announcements.
a. Director Cabrera thanked staff for informing him about the upcoming MST touch a bus and tractor event.
b. Director Rodriguez inquired about the status of MST vehicle donations. Norman Tuitavuki and staff who coordinate donations were present to answer questions.
c. Chair Carbone reminded the Board of the nominating committee for the election of new officers and to contact her if they are interested in serving on the ad hoc nominating committee. 8-3. Board Member Referrals for Future Agendas.
9. ATTACHMENTS
None.
10. CLOSED SESSION
None.
11. ADJOURN
With no further business to discuss, Chair Carbone adjourned the meeting at 10:43 AM (Pacific).
Prepared by: ___________________Reviewed by: __________________ Jeanette Alegar-Rocha Carl G. Sedoryk
Deputy Secretary/Clerk to the Board General Manager/CEO PGCC 5-20-26
Agenda No. 8 B
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jon Biggs, Community Development Director
MEETING DATE: May 20, 2026
SUBJECT: Notification of the extension of Permit No. AP-TPD-UP 19-0363 for the American Tin Cannery Hotel Project located at 109/125 Ocean View Boulevard and 124 Central Avenue.
CEQA: {CEQA}
RECOMMENDATION
Receive notification of the extension of Permit No. AP-TPD-UP 19-0363 for the American Tin Cannery Hotel Project located at 109/125 Ocean View Boulevard and 124 Central Avenue.
DISCUSSION
BACKGROUND
On January 12, 2022, at a special meeting, the City Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the American Tin Cannery Hotel and Commercial Project and approved the Project (City Council Resolution No. 22 – 002). The project is located at 109/125 Ocean View Boulevard and 124 Central Avenue. The approvals allowed the partial demolition of existing commercial buildings, removal of on-site trees, and the redevelopment of the site for a hotel with associated hotel amenities including the sale of alcoholic beverages, retail commercial uses, and on-site valet and self-service parking.
On February 7, 2022, after the City’s approval of the Project, the California Coastal Commission (CCC) appealed the City’s approval and assumed jurisdiction of the Project’s associated Coastal Development Permit (CDP). The City’s approval was then held in abeyance pending a decision by the CCC. On April 11, 2024, the CCC conducted appellate proceedings and determined that the Project, as modified, will not result in any significant environmental effects for which feasible mitigation measures have not been employed and approved. Based on the date of the CCC decision, the expiration date of the City’s approval was extended to April 11, 2026.
In April of 2026, the Executive Director of the CCC granted an extension of the Coastal Development Permit for the project to April 11, 2027.
PERMIT EXTENSION
Per Pacific Grove Municipal Code (PGMC) Section 23.73.05(c), the City’s Chief Planner (Director) may grant up to two, one-year extensions of any Community Development permit. Per PGMC Section
23.73.050(d), an application for extension was made prior to the permit expiration date for AP-TPD-UP 19-0363. A one-year extension to this permit has been granted and it expires on April 11, 2027.
PGCC 5-20-26
OPTIONS
No action, other than to receive this notification, is required.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
No significant financial impact related to the extension of the city approvals for one year is anticipated.
FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Community Development
PGCC 5-20-26
Agenda No. 8 C
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: David Stiles, Senior Accountant
MEETING DATE: May 20, 2026
SUBJECT: Check Register, Purchase Order Report, and Financial Status Report - April 2026 CEQA: {CEQA}
RECOMMENDATION
1. Receive the Check Register, Purchase Order Report, and Financial Status Report
2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
DISCUSSION
The Check Register is an account of monthly expenditures. It provides budgetary insight and promotes transparency. The Check Register is produced from the City's financial system. The report groups the checks by the respective City fund. A detailed listing of the checks issued for the month is also available. The Check Register for April 2026 is also available on the City's website.
The Purchase Order Report includes information on outstanding purchase orders that were issued. This report is intended to be consistent with the reporting requirements in Section 2.16.160 of the City's Purchasing Systems and Procedures. Purchase orders are required for purchases of supplies, services, materials, equipment, and contractual services over $5,000. The Purchase Order Report is also available on the City's website.
The Administrative Services Department produces Monthly Financial Status reports, to assist in evaluating the City's fiscal condition. The report provides details on General Fund revenues, as well as a summary related to its other funds. The Quarterly Budget Status report, which is a more detailed version of this report, is available on the City's website.
OPTIONS
N/A - This is informational only.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no financial impact. This is informational only.
FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.
Attachments
PGCC 5-20-26
Check Register by Fund - April 2026
Check Register by Detail - April 2026
FY26 Q3 Purchase Order Report
FY26 Apr Financial Status Report
PGCC 5-20-26
Fund Transaction Amount
01 - General Fund Total $ 1,750,680.20
04 - Hyperbaric Chamber Total 792.00
06 - State Franchise Peg Total 13,000.00
11 - Library Book Fund Total 4,498.08
12 - Fire Emerg Equip Fund Total 3,690.00
18 - Gas Tax Fund Total 12,622.48
20 - Rstp-(Tamc) Total 48,492.50
27 - Lighthouse Maint.& Impv. Total 3,736.08
30 - Operating Grants Total 1,158.25
31 - Operating Donations Total 82,283.40
34 - Cdbg Grant Fund Total 204,800.00
40 - Poetry Promotion Fund Total 363.21
70 - Emp Benefit Fund Total 24,481.20
71 - Workers Comp Fund Total 1,000.83
72 - Liability Ins Fund Total 19,118.45
74 - Local Water Project Total 79,728.87
75 - Cemetery Fund Total 10,066.82
76 - Sewer Fund Total 102,759.71
77 - Golf Fund Total 17,382.99
Grand Total $ 2,380,655.07
Check Register - Summary by Fund - April 2026
PGCC 5-20-26
Fund Check Date Name DESCRIPTION Amount
01 - GENERAL FUND 04/03/26 AFLAC DED:5200 AFLAC PREM $ 577.44 DED:5201 AFLAC P/T 1,472.87
CALIF LAW ENFORCMEN DED:3200 LTD PD 640.00
CALPERS HEALTH DED:109 HEALTH 668.15
DED:128 HEALTH EMP 584.43
DED:116 HEALTH 560.29
DED:3081 HEALTH EMP 987.69
DED:137 TRIO 95076 1,166.58
DED:112 HEALTH 1,168.86
DED:131 HEALTH 1,301.95
DED:106 HEALTH 1,670.14
DED:111 HEALTH 1,737.18
DED:3053 HEALTH FAM 1,519.52
DED:104 HEALTH 2,241.16
DED:2071 HEALTH 2,657.50
DED:3051 HEALTH EMP 2,922.15
DED:118 HEALTH 1,456.76
DED:2072 HEALTH 3,627.00
DED:108 HEALTH 4,342.36
DED:132 HEALTH 6,770.16
DED:2073 HEALTH FAM 7,567.50
DED:103 HEALTH 8,964.64
DED:130 HEALTH 9,113.72
DED:105 HEALTH 10,197.32
DED:4304 HLTH RETRO (22.92)
CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:3301 AFLAC MED 1,847.38
EFT DED:*FM MEDICARE 11,686.56
DED:*SCA STATE TAX 17,248.35
DED:*FT FEDERAL TX 42,917.05
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD DED:7502 WAGE GARN 881.54
PACIFIC GROVE CITY DED:7000 ASSOC DUES 735.75
MASS MUTUAL (457 PL DED:3999 ROTH IRA 3,398.00
DED:4000 DEF COMP 13,201.76
MASS MUTUAL GROUP W DED:5203 WHOLE LIFE 431.21
DED:5203 WHOLE LIFE (431.21)
MTRY COUNTY DEPT OF DED:0023 GARNISH 439.99
PACIFIC GROVE MANAG DED:7203 ASSOC DUES 35.00
CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:1006 WORK COMP 52.63
DED:1009 WORK COMP 163.46
DED:1010 WORK COMP 3,191.69
DED:1005 WORK COMP 1,530.97
DED:1003 WORK COMP 6,574.99
DED:7510 PERS REIMB 56.58
DED:200 DENTALEOER 157.90
DED:2101 DENTALEOEE 1,357.94
DED:2102 DENTAL+1EE 830.44
DED:2103 DENTAL FAM 1,231.50
DED:0005 SUTA 143.43
PERS DED:08 PERS OTHER 359.81
DED:0022 PERS SP MS 291.84
DED:0004 SURV BEN 90.21
DED:2003 PERS OTHER 173.96
DED:0019 PERS RT SF 185.10
DED:0009 PERS OTHER 509.21
DED:0018 PERS SP SF 530.90
DED:2001 PERS 2,193.46
DED:0002 PERS 2,465.51
DED:0021 PERS REG M 15,412.43
DED:0020 PERS ER M3 16,129.79
DED:0011 PERS ER SF 10,231.62
DED:0017 PERS RG SF 9,340.10
DED:01 PERS 8,765.03
DED:07 PERS CITY 5,763.83
DED:0006 PERS CITY 6,043.63
DED:2000 PERS EMPLY 3,784.48
POLICE OFFICERS ASS DED:7205 ASSOC DUES 853.67
DED:7204 ASSOC DUES 8.00
LEGAL SHIELD DED:6104 LEGAL SVC 29.30
STATE DISABILITY TA DED:0026 SDI 5,483.73
STANDARD INSURANCE DED:3500 LIFE INS 1,496.25
TRANSAMERICA EMPLOY DED:5202 TRANSAMERI 311.82
U.S. BENCOR/MIDAMER DED:4007 HRA 225.00
Check Register - Summary by Detail - April 2026
PGCC 5-20-26
Fund Check Date Name DESCRIPTION Amount
Check Register - Summary by Detail - April 2026
UNION BANK OF CALIF DED:4005 PARS-457 $ 639.10
VISION SERVICE PLAN DED:2502 VISIONEOEE 285.52
DED:2504 VISION FAM 185.64
DED:2503 VISION+1EE 185.64
DED:300 VISIONEOER 33.20
HOME DEPOT CREDIT S B&G SUPPLIES 288.25
MUNICIPAL RESOURCE ORG ASSIST / ANALYS 1,950.00
ORG ASSIST / ANALYS 3,080.00
ORG ASSIST / ANALYS 5,470.00
ORG ASSIST / ANALYS 7,182.75
04/07/26 VISION SERVICE PLAN APR 2026 VISION 11.75
04/08/26 LEGAL SHIELD FEB 2026 SWORN LEGA 29.30
04/10/26 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV REC PROGRAM SUPPLIE 17.89
B&G LANDSCAPE SUPPL 39.32
LIB SUPPLIES 66.51
PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 67.45
PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 103.79
FIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 6.54
LIB SUPPLIES 13.34
B&G DETERRENT PEST 164.55
REC PROGRAM SUPPLIE 168.52
B&G RAT DETERRENT 205.26
PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 227.73
PD RANGE SUPPLIES 422.75
FD OFFICE SUPPLIES 444.65
REC TRAINING SUPPLI 1,702.06
US BANK KHASIMI MS 365 0.72
CANALES SUBSCRPTNS 13.00
ARRIOLA NICK SMITH 14.30
MOGENSEN SUBSCRPTN 18.00
ARRIOLA CMO OFF SPP 23.48
KHASIMI CURATOR SUB 25.00
HOFFMAN RECORD REQ 33.00
GHO MTY NEWSPAPER 34.00
HALABI POSTER 37.69
LIVIAN PGHS JOB FAI 49.90
MARSH CSMFO PLAQUE 50.00
ARRIOLA JOB FAIR RE 51.32
MEDAWAR PARKING CON 56.00
LIVIAN AI SUBSCRPTI 60.00
MOGENSEN MTY CTY MT 195.00
PD TRVL 5084 STICKE 232.74
KHASIMI LINKEDIN SU 239.88
HOFFMAN PD OFF SUPP 249.21
CLARK REC PRGM SUPP 274.12
ARRIOLA CC AIRFARE 286.80
GHO MECH SM TOOLS 404.23
KANDELL ARMA CONF 476.81
KHASIMI ZOOM SUBSCP 702.15
PD TRVL 5084 BIKECL 749.00
GHO SAF EQUIP/VLNTR 866.63
KHASIMI EQUIP REPAI 871.20
PD TRVL 5092 FIREAR 960.33
KHASIMI LIB NTWSWIT 1,310.50
DAY CHIEFS CONF MCP 1,718.92
GHO PW TRAINING 1,858.69
DELFINO MTG/CONF 2,103.38
HOFFMAN REG TRAININ 75.00
ARRIOLA CMO SUBSCRP 83.25
DAY CITY VEHICLE FU 83.68
HOFFMAN TLO SUBCRPT 100.00
MARSH CONF/WEBINAR 119.00
HALABI CANVA SUBCRP 119.40
ANDERSON FRAUD CHGS 132.89
GHO MECH STOCK 137.67
PD TRVL 5084 CSO CL 155.82
MONTEREY ONE WATER LIB SEWER TREATMENT 121.98
PW SEWER TREATMENT 121.98
MUS SEWER TREATMENT 243.96
FD SEWER TREATMENT 487.92
REC SEWER TREATMENT 731.88
PD SEWER TREATMENT 853.86
PGCC 5-20-26
Fund Check Date Name DESCRIPTION Amount
Check Register - Summary by Detail - April 2026
B&G SEWER TREATMNT $ 4,382.92
ALTERNATOR STARTER B&G REPAIRS UNIT 58 566.70
ALYSSA DAVIS REFUND PERMIT FEES 246.00
AT&T LH INTERNET 3200212 112.35
AT&T CALNET 3 PD DATA LINES 8120 1,057.31
CH GENRTR ALARM 325 20.17
ADMIN INTERNET 3342 31.91
BAVCO B&G BACKFLOW SPPLY 125.00
BOUND TREE MEDICAL, FD MEDICAL SUPPLIES 1,851.61
CA BUILDING STANDAR CBSC FEE JAN-MAR 20 405.57
CA DEPT OF CONSERVA SMIP FEE JAN-MAR 20 1,242.84
CARAHSOFT DOCUSIGN RENEWAL 6,645.60
CARINA ALEXANDER TRAVEL EBIKE TRAINI 715.98
CENTRALSQUARE TECHN FINANCE SOFTWARE MA 5,211.10
CIVICPLUS, LLC ANNUAL SOFTWARE REN 10,202.38
COMCAST PW INTERNET 0389527 106.24
PD INTERNET 0387836 151.24
PW INTERNET 0194117 228.86
L.N. CURTIS & SONS EQUIPMENT NEW FIRE 7,290.46
CYPRESS COAST FENCE FENCE REPAIR 3,455.00
DEMCO INC LIB SUPPLIES 192.25
DENISE DUFFY & ASSO MND CRESPI POND 3,763.50
DROUGHT RESISTANT N B&G LANDSCAPE SUPPL 1,083.97
B&G LANDSCAPE SUPPL 604.38
EWING IRRIGATION PR BG IRRIGATION SUPPL 553.05
B&G IRRIGATION SUPP 142.88
BG IRRIGATION SUPPL 38.55
COASTAL FABRICATION MEM BENCH SUPPLIES 413.49
FENTON & KELLER LEGAL SERVICES 58,530.00
FLEXTG LLC REC KONICA LEASE 76.84
GACHINA LANDSCAPE M B&G LANDSCAPE SVCS 1,387.00
GARDAWORLD APRIL SERVICE FEES 105.55
GRANITEROCK COMPANY STREET SUPPLIES 2,411.31
STREET SUPPLIES 824.84
STREETS SUPPLIES 724.23
HANA GARDENS SEASID B&G SUPPLIES 776.63
B&G SUPPLIES 353.97
B&G SUPPLIES 5.45
HAYWARD LUMBER COMP B&G REPAIR SUPPLIES 3,782.65
STREETS SUPPPLIES 168.04
HINDERLITER, DE LLA TOT JAN- MAR 2026 817.08
TOT JAN-MAR 2026 648.02
HOMETEK MEM'L BENCH SERVICE 165.00
HOWARD'S UPHOLSTERY BG REPAIR UNIT 54 899.66
JD REPAIRS INC FD REPAIR UNIT 6414 2,784.43
FD REPAIRS UNIT 641 398.37
KIMBALL MIDWEST MECH STOCK 217.55
STREET REPAIR UNIT 363.67
B&G SUPPLIES 983.09
LORI MCDONNELL ELECTED OFFICIAL SU 546.80
MAIN STREET SIGNS SIGNAGE FOR PARKS 288.67
MARTIN GONZALEZ REG TRAINING CERT 320.00
MONTEREY PEACE OFFI MCPOA RANGE USE 630.00
MICHAEL HARVEY TRUC STREET DUMPING SVCS 727.50
MIDWEST LIBRARY SER LIB SUPPLIES 72.05
LIB SUPPLIES 55.44
LIB SUPPLIES 28.68
MISSION LINEN SUPPL FIRE DEPT LINEN UNI 426.15
MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN / UNIFORM CLE 129.66
LINEN / UNIFORM CLE 255.34
LINEN / UNIFORM CLE 631.42
LINEN / UNIFORM CLE 631.42
LINEN / UNIFORM CLE 631.43
MONTEREY BAY PEST C RODENT CONTROL FOR 135.00
RODENT CONTROL FOR 175.00
RODENT CONTROL FOR 975.00
RODENT CONTROL FOR 975.00
MONTEREY COUNTY WEE CDD PH MERMAID 329.94
MONTEREY FIRE EXTIN GC FIRE EXT SERVICE 112.50
ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI CDD OFFICE SUPPLIES 104.05
FIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 61.78
FIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 4.47
PGCC 5-20-26
Fund Check Date Name DESCRIPTION Amount
Check Register - Summary by Detail - April 2026
O'REILLY AUTO ENTER MECH REPAIRS CREDIT $ (22.00)
PD VEHILCE REPAIRS 162.20
PW VEHICLE REPAIRS 391.38
FD VEHICLE REPAIRS 748.07
BG VEHICLE REPAIRS 413.56
CEM VEHICLE REPAIRS 70.31
PACIFIC CHESS ACADE CHESS ACADEMY CLASS 1,638.00
PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PW ADMIN ELEC 5508 1,785.24
REC ELECTRIC 4030 370.38
REC ELECTRIC 0956 4,773.67
GOLF ST ELEC 3438 36.87
PACIFIC GROVE HARDW BG VEHICLE REPR SUP 64.95
FD REPAIR SUPPLIES 40.40
CDD REPAIR SUPPLIES 48.85
PD REPAIR SUPPLIES 25.11
PD VEHILCE RPSUPPLI 34.50
MUSEUM REPAIR SUPPL 35.77
MECH REPAIR SUPPLIE 5.01
B&G REPR SUP CREDIT (235.49)
B&G REPAIR SUPPLIES 343.37
PW ADMIN SUPPLIES 131.08
STREET REPAIR SUPPL 204.99
LIB REPAIR SUPPLIES 205.22
PACIFIC WEST WATER ASD WATER SERVICES 42.85
CDD WATER SERVICES 42.85
PATRICIA NOFZIGER PMT TAI CHI CLASSES 168.00
PROPS & MEASURES MANAGEMENT SERVICES 48,150.00
QUADIENT LEASING US FIN MAIL MACHINE LE 130.02
CDD MAIL MACHINE LE 200.06
CC MAIL MACHINE LEA 25.01
PW MAIL MACHINE LEA 60.03
PD MAIL MACHINE LEA 60.03
CMO MAIL MACHINE LE 10.00
REC MAIL MACHINE LE 15.00
PRIMO BRANDS REC WATER SERVICES 36.03
SAME DAY SHRED PD SHREDDING 75.00
SENTRY ALARM SYSTEM CITY HALL FIRE PANE 18,338.16
LEHR PD VEHICLE OUTFIT 808.13
STURDY OIL COMPANY STREET FUEL MAR 1,100.30
B&G FUEL MAR 2,200.60
PD FUEL MAR 4,537.38
A/R FUEL MAR 6,701.93
FD FUEL MAR 32.15
TRUCKSIS ENTERPRISE FLAGS FOR CITY 802.99
VERIZON BUSINESS PD PORT ACCESS 118.08
PD DATA 371210040 539.97
WATSONVILLE CHRYSLE PD STOCK 75.51
PD REPAIRS UNIT 7 772.64
BRIAN WHITSON MONTHLY MUSEUM JANI 2,100.00
WILSON'S PLUMBING & GC PLUMBING REPAIRS 767.72
CH RESTRM PLUMBING 377.53
04/17/26 PERS APR 2026 UAL 395,585.00
AFLAC DED:5201 AFLAC P/T 1,472.87
DED:5200 AFLAC PREM 577.44
CALPERS HEALTH DED:128 HEALTH EMP 584.43
DED:109 HEALTH 668.15
DED:116 HEALTH 560.29
DED:3053 HEALTH FAM 1,519.52
DED:104 HEALTH 2,241.16
DED:106 HEALTH 1,670.14
DED:111 HEALTH 1,737.18
DED:3081 HEALTH EMP 987.69
DED:137 TRIO 95076 1,166.58
DED:112 HEALTH 1,168.86
DED:131 HEALTH 1,301.95
DED:2071 HEALTH 2,657.50
DED:3051 HEALTH EMP 2,922.15
DED:118 HEALTH 1,456.76
DED:2072 HEALTH 3,627.00
DED:108 HEALTH 4,342.36
DED:132 HEALTH 6,770.16
DED:2073 HEALTH FAM 7,567.50
PGCC 5-20-26
Fund Check Date Name DESCRIPTION Amount
Check Register - Summary by Detail - April 2026
DED:103 HEALTH $ 8,964.64
DED:130 HEALTH 9,113.72
DED:105 HEALTH 10,197.32
CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:3301 AFLAC MED 1,847.38
EFT DED:*FM MEDICARE 11,714.66
DED:*SCA STATE TAX 17,233.07
DED:*FT FEDERAL TX 42,587.04
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD DED:7502 WAGE GARN 539.23
PACIFIC GROVE CITY DED:7000 ASSOC DUES 735.75
MASS MUTUAL (457 PL DED:4000 DEF COMP 13,486.68
DED:3999 ROTH IRA 3,398.00
MASS MUTUAL GROUP W DED:5203 WHOLE LIFE 415.85
MTRY COUNTY DEPT OF DED:0023 GARNISH 439.99
PACIFIC GROVE MANAG DED:7203 ASSOC DUES 35.00
CITY OF PACIFIC GRO DED:1006 WORK COMP 52.48
DED:1009 WORK COMP 168.02
DED:1010 WORK COMP 3,185.76
DED:1005 WORK COMP 1,557.61
DED:1003 WORK COMP 6,643.18
DED:7510 PERS REIMB 56.58
DED:200 DENTALEOER 157.90
DED:2101 DENTALEOEE 1,357.94
DED:2103 DENTAL FAM 1,231.50
DED:2102 DENTAL+1EE 830.44
DED:0005 SUTA 145.05
PERS DED:0004 SURV BEN 90.21
DED:0022 PERS SP MS 273.55
DED:2003 PERS OTHER 173.96
DED:0019 PERS RT SF (3.44)
DED:08 PERS OTHER 359.81
DED:0002 PERS 2,433.49
DED:2001 PERS 2,193.46
DED:2000 PERS EMPLY 3,784.48
DED:0011 PERS ER SF 10,418.67
DED:0017 PERS RG SF 9,410.52
DED:01 PERS 8,650.02
DED:07 PERS CITY 5,691.19
DED:0006 PERS CITY 6,573.90
DED:0021 PERS REG M 15,528.15
DED:0020 PERS ER M3 16,229.87
DED:0018 PERS SP SF 832.88
DED:0009 PERS OTHER 802.23
POLICE OFFICERS ASS DED:7205 ASSOC DUES 849.54
LEGAL SHIELD DED:6104 LEGAL SVC 29.30
STATE DISABILITY TA DED:0026 SDI 5,549.22
TRANSAMERICA EMPLOY DED:5202 TRANSAMERI 311.82
U.S. BENCOR/MIDAMER DED:4007 HRA 225.00
UNION BANK OF CALIF DED:4005 PARS-457 687.03
VISION SERVICE PLAN DED:2502 VISIONEOEE 285.52
DED:2504 VISION FAM 185.64
DED:2503 VISION+1EE 185.64
DED:300 VISIONEOER 33.20
04/16/26 CORE SURVEILLANCE LIBRARY CAMERAS 8,548.96
04/24/26 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV CTY CNCL OFF SUPPLI 22.36
BUTTERFLIES EVENT 33.57
LIB OFFICE SUPPLIES 37.35
REC OTHER SUPPLIES 37.46
FD PRINTING SUPPLIE 44.88
PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 46.68
PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 57.89
REC PROGRAM SUPPLIE 67.04
LIB SUPPLIES 67.44
REC OFFICE SUPPLIES 68.59
FD PRINTING SUPPLIE 68.80
REC OFFICE SUPPLIES 84.10
PW STOCK REPAIRS 87.55
PD STOCK REPAIRS 87.55
B&G STOCK REPAIRS 87.55
B&G REPAIR UNIT 58 126.64
REC PROGRAM SUPPLIE 135.17
PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 145.32
PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 145.70
PGCC 5-20-26
Fund Check Date Name DESCRIPTION Amount
Check Register - Summary by Detail - April 2026
FD PRINTING SUPPLIE $ 208.34
REC OFFICE SUPPLIES 213.02
REC OFFICE SUPPLIES 373.03
B&G FILTER FOUNTAIN 378.07
BACKFLOW REPAIRS 393.27
LIB OFFICE SUPPLIES 16.38
PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PHONE BOOTH-BERWICK (9.59)
PLATT PK SPRNKLR (7.75)
CALEDONIA ST 0.01
17 MI DR BALLPARK 0.05
FOREST CENTRL SPR 0.07
117 RECREATION ROOM 3.23
LOVERS POINT (11.63)
LOVERS POINT 4.83
BERWICK PARK 5.69
PLATT PK SPRNKLR 6.28
17 MI DR BALLPARK 7.84
PARKING LOT LIGHT 14.30
101 CH -FIN - 50% 17.14
101 CH -CEDD - 50% 17.14
CORP YARD DM & 5TH 15.43
CORP YARD SUNSET DR 19.25
1307 FORST SINEX SI 21.34
GRAND AV & PK PL 22.14
1307 FORST PINE SIG 25.91
CITY COUNCIL - 3% 32.65
RECREATION - 3% 32.65
COR MELROSE 39.05
162 16TH STREET 47.40
PIEDMONT & MORELAND 48.61
620 OCEAN VIEW POOL 31.04
OCEANVIEW & 17TH 53.04
300 16TH ST. 72.21
17TH ST & LAUREL 72.39
1307 FORST PINE SIG 75.61
FINANCE - 7% 76.18
1307 FORST SINEX SI 64.98
117 COMMUNITY CTR 65.73
CITY COUNCIL - 3% 87.06
17 MILE DRIVE 510.31
17TH ST & LAUREL 546.81
FOREST 40 FT E/O LH 566.14
FIRE DEPT - 24% 696.46
CALEDONIA PK LIGHTS (26.63)
FOREST CENTRL SPR (26.46)
168 16TH ST (26.17)
17 MI DR BALLPARK (26.01)
117 RECREATION ROOM (16.78)
17 MI DR BALLPARK 175.87
580 PINE AVE - LOAN 1,046.81
POLICE DEPT - 43% 1,247.83
FOREST & CENTRAL DR 1,339.61
PUBLIC LIBRARY 1,353.31
117 COMMUNITY CTR 183.84
FOREST 40 FT E/O LH 197.83
FIRE DEPT 199.69
FINANCE - 7% 203.14
117 COMMUNITY CTR 211.50
PUBLIC LIBRARY 236.90
165 FOREST AVE 240.18
FIRE DEPT - 24% 261.17
CEDD - 9.5% 275.69
CITY MANAGER - 9.5% 275.69
POLICE DEPT 326.47
550 CENTRAL AVE 383.02
FOREST & CENTRAL DR 436.32
300 FOREST AVE 171.53
RECREATION - 3% 87.06
COR MELROSE 92.96
CHAUTAUQUA HALL 95.04
CEDD - 9.5% 103.38
CITY MANAGER - 9.5% 103.38
PGCC 5-20-26
Fund Check Date Name DESCRIPTION Amount
Check Register - Summary by Detail - April 2026
CHAUTAUQUA HALL $ 117.86
CONCESSION STAND 121.09
BEACH BOAT STORAGE 134.84
POLICE DEPT - 43% 467.93
CA DEPT OF TAX AND 2026 LH Q1 SALES TA 956.00
4LEAF FY 25/26 BUILDING S 82,294.14
FY 25/26 BUILDING S 78,632.33
ACCENT CLEAN & SWEE FY 25/26 STREET SWE 18,810.00
ALENA RACHELLE WAGR PMT FOR DANCE CLASS 1,522.50
ALL STAR ELITE SPOR REC PROGRAM SUPPLIE 758.76
JOE A AMELIO TRAVEL REIMBURSMT 820.24
AT&T REC PHONE 096 31.76
ADMIN PHONE 253 31.76
AT&T CALNET 3 LIBRARY INTERNET 33 249.57
ADMIN PHONE 3242 2,150.49
AUDREY LORCA RFND REQUESTED 78.75
BRIAN DUENAS-MORALE TRAVEL LAWS OF ARRE 506.00
BRIAN WADE RFND REQUESTED 63.00
BRYCE CONSULTING IN CMO CONSULTING 1,600.00
CALIFORNIA ANIMAL W PD MEMBERSHIP 150.00
CASEY DAY LEADERSHIP TRAVEL 238.00
CHICAGO TITLE COMPA 361 LIGHTHOUSE DEED 44.00
CLAUDIA KOSTYSHAK RFND TREE PERMIT 318.00
COMCAST CH INTERNET 0085844 153.24
CH TV 0039031 14.13
REC INTERNET 021497 102.49
COPWARE, INC. PD SITE LICENSE 705.00
DAVE'S REPAIR SERVI PW HOSE REPLACMT 466.28
DROUGHT RESISTANT N B&G LANDSCAPE SUPPL 654.51
ENGINEERED FIRE SYS FD PLAN REVIEW MARC 472.50
EWING IRRIGATION PR B&G SUPPLIES 107.20
REC BLDG MAINT SUPP 108.42
FIELDS OUTDOOR ADVE PD AMMO 2,520.00
FIRST ALARM INC. PD ALARM TESTING 149.04
AT&T MOBILITY LIB PHONES 1990 224.97
PD CELL PHONES 5185 1,771.75
FOREST HILL ACE HAR PW SUPPLIES 104.10
GARDAWORLD MARCH EXCESS FEES 38.76
GROVE MARKET REC PROGRAM SUPPLIE 24.02
HARO, KASUNICH AND LOVER PT EMERGENCY 5,535.00
HARRIS & ASSOCIATES CONTRACT PLANNING S 14,527.50
HEATHER PARDINI RFND PRGM FEES 102.00
HINDERLITER, DE LLA SALES TAX SVC Q3 FY 2,486.21
HOMETEK B&G BENCH MAINT 330.00
JD REPAIRS INC FD REPAIRS UNIT 641 10,421.92
KEVIN TATSUGAWA RFND REQUESTED 10.50
KRISTEN DEMERS RFND REQUESTED 10.50
LANGUAGE LINE SERVI PD LANGUAGE SVCS 56.27
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNI MEMBERSHIP DUES 900.00
LEXIPOL LLC LEFTA SHIELD ANNUAL 6,504.75
LIEBERT CASSIDY WHI LEGAL SERVICES JAN 48.50
LEGAL SERVICES JAN 1,164.00
LEGAL SERVICES JAN 1,212.50
LEGAL SERVICES JAN 6,465.58
LYNGSOE SYSTEMS INC LIB SOFTWARE 501.00
MARIA PARKER RFND SOUND PERMIT F 95.00
MITCHELL 1 MECH SOFTWARE SUBSC 2,028.00
MONTEREY BAY ECONOM ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 5,000.00
MONTEREY BAY PEST C RODENT CONTROL FOR 135.00
RODENT CONTROL FOR 180.00
RODENT CONTROL FOR 490.00
RODENT CONTROL FOR 975.00
SEE MONTEREY TOT MKTG FY26 Q3 3% 27,163.69
COUNTY OF MONTEREY CJIS ACCESS FY26 Q3 17,072.35
MONTEREY COUNTY WEE 2ND READ SPEED ZONE 152.28
ORD AMEND SPEED ZON 152.28
PH CC TITLE 23 ZONI 355.32
CITY OF MONTEREY FY26 Q3 FIRE PREVNT 3,066.00
NICHOLAS SMITH TRAVEL PER DIEMS AD 215.00
ODP BUSINESS SOLUTI CTY CNCL OFFICE SUP 137.60
CDD OFFICE SUPPLIES 98.57
CDD OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.64
PGCC 5-20-26
Fund Check Date Name DESCRIPTION Amount
Check Register - Summary by Detail - April 2026
CMO OFFICE SUPPLIES $ 113.28
P.G. MUSEUM OF NATU FY26 MUSEUM ADMIN Q 94,000.00
PACIFIC WEST WATER PD WATER SVCS 523.74
PAUL NAGAMINE BOOT REIMBURSEMENT 238.01
PIPE DOWN LAW ENFOR PD OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,737.08
PRIMO BRANDS FD WATER SERVICES 437.11
PD WATER SERVICE 130.37
RESTORATION FIRST R PD EAP SERVICES 16,854.00
PD EAP SERVICES 16,854.00
RINCON CONSULTANTS, RINCON - HOUSING EL 3,324.50
ROBERT HALF IT SUPPORT TEMP 13,393.01
RYAN GRANCHALEK RFND REQUESTED 282.75
SALINAS VALLEY PROS PD UNIFORMS 215.20
SAME DAY SHRED CMO SHRED SVCS 55.00
SPCA OF MONTEREY CO PD ANIMAL SERVICES 2,260.00
TASHA STEVENS RFND REQUESTED 157.50
TOPE'S TREE SERVICE CONTRACT TREE SERVI 47,200.00
TRUCKSIS ENTERPRISE PD BUSINESS CARDS 262.24
V & V MANUFACTURING PD BADGES 946.96
VERIZON BUSINESS PD PORT ACCESS 118.08
PD PHONES APR 99.93
ADMIN PHONES APR 167.95
CDD PHONES APR 137.04
FD PHONES APR 62.77
IT PHONES APR 45.20
REC PHONES APR 37.35
PD DATA 371210040 537.32
PW PHONES APR 558.85
CMO PHONES APR 1,698.83
VESTIS SERVICES, LL PD LINEN SVCS 746.12
WELLS FARGO VENDOR KONICA LEASE FY25/2 169.21
KONICA LEASE FY25/2 195.01
KONICA LEASE FY25/2 216.78
KONICA LEASE FY25/2 216.80
KONICA LEASE FY25/2 216.80
KONICA LEASE FY25/2 216.80
KONICA LEASE FY25/2 232.67
SWIFT CAR WASH PD CAR WASHES MAY 320.00
04/27/26 EFT Q1 TAXES 2026 941V 0.09
04 - HYPERBARIC CHAMBER 04/10/26 PENINSULA WELDING & HYPERBRC CHMBER 792.00 06 - STATE FRANCHISE PEG ACCESS MEDIA PRODUC AMP RENEWAL FY26 CO 13,000.00 11 - LIBRARY BOOK FUND AMAZON CAPITAL SERV LIB BOOKS & MATERIA (22.37) LIB BOOKS & MATERIA (21.81)
LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 17.43
LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 158.26
LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 47.24
LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 52.35
LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 52.84
LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 53.51
LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 62.18
LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 21.62
LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 21.81
LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 22.37
LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 23.06
US BANK CANALES BOOKS & MAT 228.02
CENGAGE LEARNING LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 33.20
LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 131.93
INGRAM LIBRARY SERV LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 1,693.04
MIDWEST LIBRARY SER LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 739.60
LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 575.13
LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 359.14
MIDWEST TAPE LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 101.81
LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 104.03
LIB BOOKS & MATERIA 43.69
12 - FIRE EMERG EQUIP FUND HONEYWELL INTERNATI FS14 ALERTING SYSTE 3,690.00 18 - GAS TAX FUND STURDY OIL COMPANY GAS TAX FUEL MAR 1,100.30 04/17/26 PERS APR 2026 UAL 2,373.42
04/24/26 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT FOREST AVE SUNSET A 49.31
FOREST AVE SUNSET A 17.64
FOREST AV SUNSET AV 18.86
FOREST AV SUNSET AV 15.00
19TH & SUNSET DR. 15.00
PGCC 5-20-26
Fund Check Date Name DESCRIPTION Amount
Check Register - Summary by Detail - April 2026
PW ELECTRIC 4482 $ 9,032.95
20 - RSTP-(TAMC) GHD INC. CEDAR, SUNSET, CONG 48,492.50 27 - LIGHTHOUSE MAINT.& IMPV. 04/10/26 MONTEREY ONE WATER LH SEWER TREATMENT 121.98 ESCARRAGA'S LUXURY LH MAR CLEANING 504.00
PACIFIC GROVE HARDW LH REPAIR SUPPLIES 200.17
RAUL M. GARCIA LH CLOCK REPAIRS 265.00
04/24/26 AMAZON CAPITAL SERV LH SUPPLIES 17.50
PACIFIC GAS & ELECT ASILOMAR BLVD PG LH 77.36
ASILOMAR BLVD PG LH 33.16
AT&T CALNET 3 LH PHONE 3247 31.91
HAPPY WOMAN JEWELRY LH MERCHANDISE 270.00
KAY BONNELL LH MERCHANDISE 637.00
LIFE AT SEA LH MERCHANDISE 1,578.00
30 - OPERATING GRANTS 04/10/26 ROBERT HALF CDD HOUSING TEMP 1,158.25 31 - OPERATING DONATIONS GREEN VALLEY LANDSC PERKINS PARK LANDSC 7,724.15 HUNTER PORTER ELDRI CHAUTAUQUA HALL PRO 8,619.25
KIMM BARNES CHINESE PAVILION CI 2,000.00
OJLA CHINESE PAVILION CI 5,000.00
PREMO ROOFING PD ROOF REPLACEMENT 58,940.00
34 - CDBG GRANT FUND 04/07/26 OLD REPUBLIC TITLE 308 CHESTNUT STREET 199,000.00 04/24/26 TOWNSHEND BUILDER REHAB LOAN 409 WILL 5,800.00 40 - POETRY PROMOTION FUND 04/10/26 MONTEREY ONE WATER POET SEWER TREATMEN 177.66 MITY-LITE, INC. LIB POETRY PROMOTIO 85.55
04/24/26 KATHRYN VOGEL POETRY PROGRAM 100.00
70 - EMP BENEFIT FUND 04/07/26 CALPERS HEALTH APR26 RET & CHANGES 12,852.75 STANDARD INSURANCE APR 2026 LIFE PREMI 3,088.24
MAR 2026 DENTAL 7,357.64
04/24/26 CLAREMONT BEHAVIORA EAP APRIL SERVICES 752.45
PARS PARS FEES FEB 2026 430.12
71 - WORKERS COMP FUND 04/17/26 PERS APR 2026 UAL 1,000.83 72 - LIABILITY INS FUND APR 2026 UAL 890.00
04/24/26 MARK'S BARN AUTO BO PD VEHICLE REPAIR I 17,364.99 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA VEHICLE REPAIR CLAI 661.90
SIGNWORKS VEHICLE REPAIR CLAI 201.56
74 - LOCAL WATER PROJECT 04/10/26 MONTEREY ONE WATER LWP SEWER TREATMENT 24,526.84 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT LWP ELECTRIC 0792 6,503.95
04/24/26 PERC WATER CORPORAT LWP O&M SERVICES FY 48,698.08 75 - CEMETERY FUND 04/10/26 HAYWARD LUMBER COMP CEM REPAIR SUPPLIES 196.81 MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN / UNIFORM CLE 631.42
PACIFIC GROVE HARDW CEM REPAIR SUPPLIES 216.66
STURDY OIL COMPANY CEM FUEL MAR 622.74
TURF STAR INC. CEM UNIT 71D MAINT 61.30
CEM SUPP UNIT 71D 27.08
CEM SUPPLY UNIT 71D 95.89
CEM SUPPLIES 67.89
CEM UNIT 71D MAINT 467.16
04/17/26 PERS APR 2026 UAL 4,105.92
04/24/26 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT CEMETERY - 1% 10.88
CEMETERY - 1% 29.02
CEMETERY 23.78
CREST & RIPPLE 15.89
BIG BRAND TIRE AND CEM REPAIR UNIT L47 706.52
BEARING ENGINEERING CEM REPAIR UNIT 68 87.86
LLORIN-VELASQUEZ CO FY 25/26 CEMETERY H 2,700.00
76 - SEWER FUND 04/03/26 WALLACE GROUP SCSMP 1, 6, 9 CIP24 18,717.04 04/10/26 US BANK GHO ST RPR UNIT G1 185.49
MISSION UNIFORM SER LINEN / UNIFORM CLE 631.42
PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PW SEWER ELEC 4175 41.26
PW SEWER ELEC 5126 980.35
PACIFIC GROVE HARDW SEWER REPAIR SUPPLI 67.61
STURDY OIL COMPANY SEWER FUEL MAR 1,230.62
WALLACE GROUP SCSMP 1, 6, 9 CIP24 64,870.30
04/17/26 PERS APR 2026 UAL 12,774.67
04/24/26 PACIFIC GAS & ELECT PUMP SUNSET ARENA 150.59
EARDLEY PUMP #1 153.08
PUMP 17TH & OCNVW 166.48
PUMP RUSSELL SVC CT 19.35
1996 SUNSET DR. 33.71
1996 SUNSET DR. 14.71
PUMP RUSSELL SVC CT 10.27
OCEANVIEW BLVD & 8T 5.48
PUMP STATION (9.70)
PGCC 5-20-26
Fund Check Date Name DESCRIPTION Amount
Check Register - Summary by Detail - April 2026
520 OCEAN VIEW BLVD $ 4.36
520 OCEAN VIEW BLVD (12.84)
471 OCEAN VIEW BL. 208.25
PUMP SUNSET ARENA 449.39
PUMP SUNSET ARENA 458.39
360 OCEAN VIEW BLVD 320.26
O V 9TH PUMP #2 968.47
471 OCEAN VIEW BL. 76.65
EARDLEY PUMP #1 53.96
17TH & OCNVW 63.05
AT&T PW SEWER PHONE 126 31.76
PW SEWER PHONE 057 31.76
PW SEWER PHONE 139 31.76
PW SEWER PHONE 293 31.76
77 - GOLF FUND PACIFIC GAS & ELECT 1313 OCEAN VIEW BLV 31.29 1313 OCEAN VIEW BLV 70.19
PACIFIC GROVE CAPIT JAN-MAR 2026 13,781.51
PACIFIC GROVE GOLF MARCH FOOD / BEV 3,500.00
Grand Total $ 2,380,655.07
PGCC 5-20-26
FPP0016 Purchase Order Details
PO Dates Between Jan 1, 2026 and Mar 31, 2026
Report Generated on Apr 7, 2026 6:34:15 PM Page 1
Approval
Group
Vendor PO Nbr PO Line Item Check
#
Invoice Orig
Encumbrance
Changes Payments PO Balance
CITY HALL ACCESS MEDIA
PRODUCTIONS
26000123 AMP RENEWAL
FY26 CONTRACT
52,000.00 0.00 0.00 52,000.00
Total for PO 26000123 52,000.00 0.00 0.00 52,000.00
Total for ACCESS MEDIA PRODUCTIONS 52,000.00 0.00 0.00 52,000.00 CARAHSOFT 26000119 DOCUSIGN
RENEWAL
6,645.60 0.00 0.00 6,645.60
Total for PO 26000119 6,645.60 0.00 0.00 6,645.60
Total for CARAHSOFT 6,645.60 0.00 0.00 6,645.60
CATALIS PWE 26000100 QALERT
SOFTWARE 2025
7,775.00 0.00 0.00 7,775.00
QALERT
SOFTWARE 2025
115262 INV308368374 0.00 0.00 7,775.00 (7,775.00)
Total for PO 26000100 7,775.00 0.00 7,775.00 0.00
Total for CATALIS PWE 7,775.00 0.00 7,775.00 0.00
CDW
GOVERNMENT
INC
26000103 ADOBE
SUBSCRIPTION
RENEWAL
4,586.36 0.00 0.00 4,586.36
Total for PO 26000103 4,586.36 0.00 0.00 4,586.36
Total for CDW GOVERNMENT INC 4,586.36 0.00 0.00 4,586.36 CLEARGOV 26000090 CLEARGOV
TRANSPARENCY
APPLICATION
7,158.50 0.00 0.00 7,158.50
CLEARGOV
TRANSPARENCY
APPLICATION
115020 2025-18273 0.00 0.00 7,158.50 (7,158.50)
Total for PO 26000090 7,158.50 0.00 7,158.50 0.00
Total for CLEARGOV 7,158.50 0.00 7,158.50 0.00
CORE
SURVEILLANCE
26000125 LIBRARY
CAMERAS
15,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00
Total for PO 26000125 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00
Total for CORE SURVEILLANCE 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 FLEXTG LLC 26000093 KONICA COPIES
FY26
14,656.59 0.00 0.00 14,656.59
Total for PO 26000093 14,656.59 0.00 0.00 14,656.59
Total for FLEXTG LLC 14,656.59 0.00 0.00 14,656.59
PROPS &
MEASURES
26000124 MANAGEMENT
SERVICES FY26
141,530.00 0.00 0.00 141,530.00
Total for PO 26000124 141,530.00 0.00 0.00 141,530.00
Total for PROPS & MEASURES 141,530.00 0.00 0.00 141,530.00 SITE
INDUSTRIES,
LLC
26000121 GIS MAPPING
CEMETERY
6,500.00 0.00 0.00 6,500.00
GIS MAPPING
CEMETERY
115655 067060 0.00 0.00 6,500.00 (6,500.00)
Total for PO 26000121 6,500.00 0.00 6,500.00 0.00
Total for SITE INDUSTRIES, LLC 6,500.00 0.00 6,500.00 0.00 Total for CITY HALL 255,852.05 0.00 21,433.50 234,418.55 CITY
MANAGER
FENTON &
KELLER
26000120 LEGAL
SERVICES
26,780.00 0.00 0.00 26,780.00
LEGAL
SERVICES
115663 195754 0.00 0.00 26,780.00 (26,780.00)
Total for PO 26000120 26,780.00 0.00 26,780.00 0.00
Total for FENTON & KELLER 26,780.00 0.00 26,780.00 0.00 Server Name: plus-cog11.aspgov.com User Name: DAVID STILES PGCC 5-20-26
FPP0016 Purchase Order Details
PO Dates Between Jan 1, 2026 and Mar 31, 2026
Report Generated on Apr 7, 2026 6:34:15 PM Page 2
Approval
Group
Vendor PO Nbr PO Line Item Check
#
Invoice Orig
Encumbrance
Changes Payments PO Balance
CITY
MANAGER
HINDERLITER,
DE LLAMAS &
ASSOCIATES
26000095 CANNABIS
MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM
50,000.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00
CANNABIS
MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM
115160 SIN058034 0.00 0.00 35,225.00 (35,225.00)
CANNABIS
MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM
115425 SIN056059 0.00 0.00 300.00 (300.00)
Total for PO 26000095 50,000.00 0.00 35,525.00 14,475.00 Total for HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS & ASSOCIATES 50,000.00 0.00 35,525.00 14,475.00 Total for CITY MANAGER 76,780.00 0.00 62,305.00 14,475.00
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
HARRIS &
ASSOCIATES,
INC.
26000108 CONTRACT
PLANNING
SERVICES FY26
367,265.00 0.00 0.00 367,265.00
CONTRACT
PLANNING
SERVICES FY26
115424 71014 0.00 0.00 10,237.50 (10,237.50)
CONTRACT
PLANNING
SERVICES FY26
115672 71423 0.00 0.00 4,338.75 (4,338.75)
Total for PO 26000108 367,265.00 0.00 14,576.25 352,688.75 Total for HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 367,265.00 0.00 14,576.25 352,688.75 Total for COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 367,265.00 0.00 14,576.25 352,688.75 FIRE
DEPARTMENT
ALLSTAR FIRE
EQUIPMENT
INC.
26000112 HOSE FOR NEW
FIRE TRUCK
8,398.15 0.00 0.00 8,398.15
Total for PO 26000112 8,398.15 0.00 0.00 8,398.15
Total for ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC. 8,398.15 0.00 0.00 8,398.15 L.N. CURTIS &
SONS
26000111 EQUIPMENT
NEW FIRE
TRUCK
16,486.30 0.00 0.00 16,486.30
Total for PO 26000111 16,486.30 0.00 0.00 16,486.30
Total for L.N. CURTIS & SONS 16,486.30 0.00 0.00 16,486.30 Total for FIRE DEPARTMENT 24,884.45 0.00 0.00 24,884.45 POLICE
DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF
MONTEREY -
SHERIFF
26000092 CRIMINAL
JUSTICE
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
20,183.81 0.00 0.00 20,183.81
CRIMINAL
JUSTICE
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
115173 3204 0.00 0.00 20,183.81 (20,183.81)
Total for PO 26000092 20,183.81 0.00 20,183.81 0.00
26000107 CJIS ACCESS
MONTEREY
COUNTY
SHERIFFS
17,297.88 0.00 0.00 17,297.88
CJIS ACCESS
MONTEREY
COUNTY
SHERIFFS
115440 3236 0.00 0.00 17,297.88 (17,297.88)
Total for PO 26000107 17,297.88 0.00 17,297.88 0.00
Total for COUNTY OF MONTEREY - SHERIFF 37,481.69 0.00 37,481.69 0.00 GOGOV, INC. 26000091 PERMIT AND
LICENCE
SUBSCRIPTION
8,988.00 0.00 0.00 8,988.00
PERMIT AND 115035 25-739 0.00 0.00 8,988.00 (8,988.00)
Server Name: plus-cog11.aspgov.com User Name: DAVID STILES PGCC 5-20-26
FPP0016 Purchase Order Details
PO Dates Between Jan 1, 2026 and Mar 31, 2026
Report Generated on Apr 7, 2026 6:34:15 PM Page 3
Approval
Group
Vendor PO Nbr PO Line Item Check
#
Invoice Orig
Encumbrance
Changes Payments PO Balance
POLICE
DEPARTMENT
GOGOV, INC. 26000091 LICENCE
SUBSCRIPTION
Total for PO 26000091 8,988.00 0.00 8,988.00 0.00
Total for GOGOV, INC. 8,988.00 0.00 8,988.00 0.00
NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA'S
EMERGENCY
26000094 EMERGENCY
VEHICLE
INSTALLATION
8,697.31 0.00 0.00 8,697.31
EMERGENCY
VEHICLE
INSTALLATION
115179 6133 0.00 0.00 8,697.31 (8,697.31)
Total for PO 26000094 8,697.31 0.00 8,697.31 0.00
Total for NORTHERN CALIFORNIA'S EMERGENCY 8,697.31 0.00 8,697.31 0.00
TRACNET
CORPORATION
26000101 RMS
MAINTENANCETRACNET
9,500.00 0.00 0.00 9,500.00
RMS
MAINTENANCETRACNET
115330 10153 0.00 0.00 9,500.00 (9,500.00)
Total for PO 26000101 9,500.00 0.00 9,500.00 0.00
Total for TRACNET CORPORATION 9,500.00 0.00 9,500.00 0.00 Total for POLICE DEPARTMENT 64,667.00 0.00 64,667.00 0.00 PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
ALFREDOS
CONCRETE
26000109 ESPLANADE
BULB OUT
CONCRETE
WORK
29,768.00 0.00 0.00 29,768.00
ESPLANADE
BULB OUT
CONCRETE
WORK
115512 3160 0.00 0.00 29,768.00 (29,768.00)
Total for PO 26000109 29,768.00 0.00 29,768.00 0.00
Total for ALFREDOS CONCRETE 29,768.00 0.00 29,768.00 0.00 AURUM
CONSULTING
ENGINEERS,
INC.
26000115 GENERATOR
DESIGN FOR
MUSEUM
9,525.00 0.00 0.00 9,525.00
GENERATOR
DESIGN FOR
MUSEUM
115522 50158 0.00 0.00 1,805.00 (1,805.00)
Total for PO 26000115 9,525.00 0.00 1,805.00 7,720.00
Total for AURUM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 9,525.00 0.00 1,805.00 7,720.00 DWAN
ELEVATOR CO
26000089 ELEVATOR
INSPECTION,
MAINTENANCE &
27,691.00 0.00 0.00 27,691.00
ELEVATOR
INSPECTION,
MAINTENANCE &
115027 37625 0.00 0.00 6,922.75 (6,922.75)
Total for PO 26000089 27,691.00 0.00 6,922.75 20,768.25 Total for DWAN ELEVATOR CO 27,691.00 0.00 6,922.75 20,768.25 GRAHAM
CONTRACTORS
INC.
26000098 FY24/25 CRACK
& SLURRY SEAL
338,568.00 0.00 0.00 338,568.00
FY24/25 CRACK
& SLURRY SEAL
115156 033520 0.00 0.00 264,578.00 (264,578.00)
FY24/25 CRACK
& SLURRY SEAL
115156 033616 0.00 0.00 73,990.00 (73,990.00)
Total for PO 26000098 338,568.00 0.00 338,568.00 0.00
Total for GRAHAM CONTRACTORS INC. 338,568.00 0.00 338,568.00 0.00 HONEYWELL 26000097 FS14 ALERTING 142,724.25 0.00 0.00 142,724.25 Server Name: plus-cog11.aspgov.com User Name: DAVID STILES PGCC 5-20-26
FPP0016 Purchase Order Details
PO Dates Between Jan 1, 2026 and Mar 31, 2026
Report Generated on Apr 7, 2026 6:34:15 PM Page 4
Approval
Group
Vendor PO Nbr PO Line Item Check
#
Invoice Orig
Encumbrance
Changes Payments PO Balance
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
INTERNATIONAL
INC
26000097 SYSTEM
FS14 ALERTING
SYSTEM
115162 5271676026 0.00 0.00 62,059.40 (62,059.40)
FS14 ALERTING
SYSTEM
115296 5271993996 0.00 0.00 73,662.60 (73,662.60)
Total for PO 26000097 142,724.25 0.00 135,722.00 7,002.25 Total for HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC 142,724.25 0.00 135,722.00 7,002.25
KNAPP MILL
AND CABINET
COMPANY
26000118 CITY HALL
DOOR &
WINDOW
REPAIR
PROJECT
38,898.06 0.00 0.00 38,898.06
CITY HALL
DOOR &
WINDOW
REPAIR
PROJECT
115677 8791 0.00 0.00 8,206.00 (8,206.00)
CITY HALL
DOOR &
WINDOW
REPAIR
PROJECT
115677 8792 0.00 0.00 9,600.00 (9,600.00)
Total for PO 26000118 38,898.06 0.00 17,806.00 21,092.06 Total for KNAPP MILL AND CABINET COMPANY 38,898.06 0.00 17,806.00 21,092.06
MONTEREY
ONE WATER -
MONTEREY
26000105 SEMI-ANNUAL
MRSWP JULDEC FY25-26
52,000.00 0.00 0.00 52,000.00
SEMI-ANNUAL
MRSWP JULDEC FY25-26
115443 16315 0.00 0.00 25,839.41 (25,839.41)
Total for PO 26000105 52,000.00 0.00 25,839.41 26,160.59 26000106 FOG /
STORMWATER
INSPEC FY25-26
21,800.00 0.00 0.00 21,800.00
FOG /
STORMWATER
INSPEC FY25-26
115443 16324 0.00 0.00 2,517.96 (2,517.96)
Total for PO 26000106 21,800.00 0.00 2,517.96 19,282.04 Total for MONTEREY ONE WATER - MONTEREY 73,800.00 0.00 28,357.37 45,442.63
MONTEREY
REGIONAL
WASTE MGMT
DIST.
26000096 FY25/26 SB 1383
IMPLEMENTION
MOU
22,396.00 0.00 0.00 22,396.00
FY25/26 SB 1383
IMPLEMENTION
MOU
115176 04-SB13832526 0.00 0.00 22,396.00 (22,396.00)
Total for PO 26000096 22,396.00 0.00 22,396.00 0.00
Total for MONTEREY REGIONAL WASTE MGMT DIST. 22,396.00 0.00 22,396.00 0.00
PACIFIC GROVE
GOLF LINKS
26000104 GOLF LINKS
FOOD &
BEVERAGES
SERVICES
17,500.00 0.00 0.00 17,500.00
GOLF LINKS
FOOD &
BEVERAGES
SERVICES
115451 52021321 0.00 0.00 3,500.00 (3,500.00)
GOLF LINKS
FOOD &
BEVERAGES
SERVICES
115451 62021310 0.00 0.00 3,500.00 (3,500.00)
Server Name: plus-cog11.aspgov.com User Name: DAVID STILES PGCC 5-20-26
FPP0016 Purchase Order Details
PO Dates Between Jan 1, 2026 and Mar 31, 2026
Report Generated on Apr 7, 2026 6:34:15 PM Page 5
Approval
Group
Vendor PO Nbr PO Line Item Check
#
Invoice Orig
Encumbrance
Changes Payments PO Balance
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
PACIFIC GROVE
GOLF LINKS
Total for PO 26000104 17,500.00 0.00 7,000.00 10,500.00 26000116 GOLF LINKS
REPAIR
MAINTENANCE
7,869.46 0.00 0.00 7,869.46
GOLF LINKS
REPAIR
MAINTENANCE
115576 62021020 0.00 0.00 7,869.46 (7,869.46)
Total for PO 26000116 7,869.46 0.00 7,869.46 0.00
Total for PACIFIC GROVE GOLF LINKS 25,369.46 0.00 14,869.46 10,500.00 PREMO
ROOFING
26000110 YOUTH CENTER
ROOF REPAIR
13,960.00 0.00 0.00 13,960.00
YOUTH CENTER
ROOF REPAIR
115582 9712 0.00 0.00 13,960.00 (13,960.00)
Total for PO 26000110 13,960.00 0.00 13,960.00 0.00
Total for PREMO ROOFING 13,960.00 0.00 13,960.00 0.00
SENTRY ALARM
SYSTEMS INC.
26000114 FIVE-YEAR
SPRINKLER
INSPECTION ON
19,570.00 0.00 0.00 19,570.00
FIVE-YEAR
SPRINKLER
INSPECTION ON
115590 STMT-153-030326 0.00 0.00 8,937.51 (8,937.51)
Total for PO 26000114 19,570.00 0.00 8,937.51 10,632.49 Total for SENTRY ALARM SYSTEMS INC. 19,570.00 0.00 8,937.51 10,632.49
SPEKTREN
ENGINEERING
INC
26000099 SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENTS
(SINEX &
CONGRESS)
224,557.34 0.00 0.00 224,557.34
SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENTS
(SINEX &
CONGRESS)
115193 2601 0.00 0.00 213,329.47 (213,329.47)
SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENTS
(SINEX &
CONGRESS)
115193 2603 0.00 0.00 11,227.87 (11,227.87)
Total for PO 26000099 224,557.34 0.00 224,557.34 0.00
Total for SPEKTREN ENGINEERING INC 224,557.34 0.00 224,557.34 0.00 Total for PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 966,827.11 0.00 843,669.43 123,157.68 Overall Total 1,756,275.61 0.00 1,006,651.18 749,624.43 Server Name: plus-cog11.aspgov.com User Name: DAVID STILES PGCC 5-20-26
Revenues by Fund - FY 2025-26 (Unaudited)
Through April 2026
83% of Budget Year Complete
Fund
Revised
Budget YTD
YTD % of
Budget Prior YTD
Projected
Change for
Fiscal Year
Projected
Ending
Reserves *
Main Fund - Fund 01 33,460,651 $ 28,398,453 $ 85% 28,844,286 $ (1,576,147) $ 15,609,656 $ Other Funds Included 1,027,610 166,445 16% 36,514 (110,640) 60,419 General Fund 34,488,261 28,564,898 83% 28,880,800 (1,686,787) 15,670,075 Capital Projects $ 506,682 $ 745,440 147% 651,140 $ (959,003) 1,305,115 Capital Funds 506,682 745,440 147% 651,140 (959,003) 1,305,115 Local Water Project 1,288,746 989,013 77% 1,055,265 263,641 482,582 Cemetery 580,902 459,873 79% 523,380 (267,207) 766,398
Sewer 4,099,809 2,888,319 70% 3,588,735 (3,535,874) 6,521,660 Golf 956,538 885,076 93% 821,993 (41,144) 917,793
Sewer Lateral Loans 3,908 178% 12,060 6,951 (26,092) 155,482 Enterprise Funds 6,929,903 5,229,232 75% 6,001,433 (3,606,676) 8,843,915 Employee Benefit 316,299 242,076 77% 214,740 3,599 65,661 Worker's Compensation 925,299 846,815 92% 552,713 8,351 772,664 Liability Insurance 753,944 587,721 78% 585,530 (128,223) 773,000 Internal Service Funds 1,995,542 1,676,612 84% 1,352,983 (116,273) 1,611,326 Library 23, 141 114% 48,851 26,492 13,141 610,620
Cemetery 121,734 100,535 83% 194,723 121,734 2,411,891
Yount 8,000 - 0% 33,673 807,008 -
Trust Funds 152,875 127,027 83% 277,247 134,875 3,829,519 Library / Poetry 101,677 140,547 138% 114,774 (723) 317,397 Museum 8,073 7,396 92% 21,724 (32,927) 265,456
Public Safety 732,890 569,620 78% 570,917 (133,319) 445,245 Housing 48,956 56,146 115% 79,967 (363,927) 299,633
Streets 1,935,351 1,413,412 73% 1,480,197 (2,405,918) 531,169 Lighthouse 126,917 100,491 79% 113,914 (60,966) 163,206 Community Development/CDBG 41,957 42,746 102% 55,607 (370,444) 348,797 ARPA - - 0% 31,067 - -
Downtown/Hospitality Districts 561,700 466,613 83% 460,677 - 58,804 Cable Franchise / Other 62,750 152,231 200% 127,178 (150,441) 168,488 Other Funds 3,620,271 2,949,202 81% 3,056,022 (3,518,665) 2,598,194 Totals All Funds 47,693,534 $ $ 39,292,411 82% 40,219,625 $ $ (9,752,529) $ 33,858,144 * Excludes Proposed Adjustments and Rollovers
Revenues Working Capital
Analysis: P10 revenues are aligned with budget, primarily due to $4.8M in Property Tax receipts in the period.
83%
147%
75%
84%
83%
81%
82%
General Fund
Capital Funds
Enterprise Funds
Internal Service Funds
Trust Funds
Other Funds
Totals All Funds
Budgeted Revenues / YTD % of Budget - By Fund Type
PGCC 5-20-26
Fund
Main Fund - Fund 01
Other Funds Included
General Fund
Capital Projects
Capital Funds
Local Water Project
Cemetery
Sewer
Golf
Sewer Lateral Loans
Enterprise Funds
Employee Benefit
Worker's Compensation
Liability Insurance
Internal Service Funds
Library
Cemetery
Yount
Trust Funds
Library / Poetry
Museum
Public Safety
Housing
Streets
Lighthouse
Community Development/CDBG
ARPA
Downtown/Hospitality Districts
Cable Franchise / Other
Other Funds
Totals All Funds
Expenses by Fund - FY 2025-26 (Unaudited)
Through April 2026
83% of Budget Year Complete
Revised
Budget YTD
YTD % of
Projected
Purchase
Orders
YTD %
with POs Prior YTD
$ 26,286,906 35,036,798 $ 75% 3,384,790 $ 85% 26,398,454 $ 1,138,250 112,461 10% 186,708 26% 14,656
36,175,048 26,399,367 73% 3,571,498 83% 26,413,110
$ 1,465,685 $ 984,817 67% $ 67% 795,328 - $
1,465,685 984,817 67% 67% 795,328 -
1,025,105 920,077 90% 86,407 98% 1,550,821
848,109 621,450 73% 74% 524,037 5,676
7,635,683 2,058,573 27% 1,984,099 53% 2,880,576
997,682 889,589 89% 10,500 90% 649,646
30,000 14% 4,261 - 14% -
10,536,579 4,493,950 43% 2,086,682 62% 5,605,080
312,700 273,749 88% 88% 311,714 -
916,948 750,503 82% 82% 1,034,137 -
882,167 703,504 80% 80% 672,608 5,446
2,111,815 1,727,756 82% 82% 2,018,459 5,446
10,000 - 0% - 0% -
- - 0% - 0% -
8,000 75% 6,000 - 75% 7,849
18,000 6,000 33% 33% - 7,849
102,400 62,602 61% - 61% 49,236
41,000 40,749 99% - 99% 58,809
866,209 746,319 86% 3,313 87% 629,688
412,883 87,054 21% - 21% 74,330
4,341,269 1,180,931 27% 519,359 39% 1,255,151
187,883 90,133 48% - 48% 99,132
412,401 24,206 6% 39,000 15% 21,395
- - 0% - 0% 812,068
561,700 396,623 71% - 71% 366,596
213,191 143,746 67% 55,394 93% 97,503
7,138,936 2,772,363 39% 617,066 47% 3,463,908
$ 57,446,063 $ 36,384,253 63% 6,280,692 $ 74% 38,303,734 $ Expenses
Analysis: P10 expenses are significantly lower than budget. Individually significant items are as follows: Other Funds: $900k budget for Chautauqua Hall and Chinese Pavilion, with no expenditures YTD. Sewer/Streets/RMRA/Capital Projects: $4.3M CIP combined budget rollover with minimal expenditures YTD.
73%
67%
43%
82%
33%
39%
63%
General Fund
Capital Funds
Enterprise Funds
Internal Service Funds
Trust Funds
Other Funds
Totals All Funds
Budgeted Expenses / YTD % of Budget By Fund Type
PGCC 5-20-26
General Fund Revenues - FY 2025-26 (Unaudited)
Through April 2026
83% of Budget Year Complete
Revenue Account Revised Budget YTD Revenues
YTD % of
Budget
Year End
Projection
Prior YTD
Revenues
Prior YTD %
of PY Actual
Property Taxes 11,222,700 $ 11,015,843 $ 98% 11,255,000 10,422,108 98% Sales Taxes 6,353,575 4,528,752 71% 7,076,000 4,332,476 64% Business License/Cannabis Taxes 1,214,530 1,005,578 83% 1,891,000 715,519 53% Franchise Taxes 1,650,400 1,242,409 75% 1,962,000 1,007,183 63% Utility User Taxes 2,183,500 1,711,900 78% 2,244,000 1,859,054 76% Transient Occupancy Tax 7,739,984 5,399,452 70% 7,314,000 5,561,204 74% Litter Abatement 210,000 168,090 80% 336,000 106,163 50% Construction Permits 932,200 944,795 101% 1,315,000 741,029 72% Zoning Enforcement 206,000 401,076 195% 502,000 172,280 80% Plan Check Fees 606,700 517,617 85% 585,000 495,281 89% Parking Meters 351,200 287,512 82% 350,000 297,519 82%
Water Entitlements 287,600 117,697 41% 125,000 1,528,493 95% Interest Earned 843,002 1,080,793 128% 1,081,000 1,224,646 100% Investment Market Value Gain/Loss 101,386 - 200% 102,000 324,907 100% Indirect Cost Reimbursement 2,049,600 1,518,000 74% 2,024,000 1,314,000 75% Total Major Revenues 35,850,991 30,040,900 84% 38,162,000 30,101,862 80% Total General Fund [Main] Revenues 33,460,651 28,398,453 85% 35,772,000 28,844,286 77% FY 2023-24 Tax Revenues Property Taxes Sales Taxes BL/Other Franchise Hotel Taxes Utility 10,135,764 5,975,031 697,772 1,635,968 6,730,240 2,118,068 Analysis: P10 revenues are aligned with budget primarily due to:
1. $4.8M Property Tax receipt in the current period,
2. $2.6M Interest earned YTD.
Note: Bus Lic for FY24-25 was adjusted in Period 13 to move revenues belonging to FY23-24. This will remain high until year end. 98%
71%
83%
75%
78%
70%
98%
64%
53%
63%
76%
74%
Property Taxes - $11.2 million
Sales Taxes - $6.4 million
Business License/Cannabis Taxes - $1.2 million
Franchise Taxes - $1.7 million
Utility User Taxes - $2.2 million
Transient Occupancy Tax - $7.7 million
Budgeted Tax Revenues / YTD % of Budget - Current YTD vs Prior YTD 25-26 24-25
PGCC 5-20-26
General Fund Expenses (including Transfer) by Department - FY 2025-26 (Unaudited) Through April 2026
83% of Budget Year Complete
Department Revised Budget
YTD
Expenditures
YTD % of
Budget
PY YTD %
of PY
Budget
Outstanding
Purchase
Orders
YTD %
with POs
Year End
Projection
City Council $ 276,365 $ 151,225 55% 120% -$ 55% 276,000 $ Non Departmental 7,034,619 6,096,745 87% 0% 87% 7,035,000 - City Attorney 915,000 556,020 61% 59% 379,864 102% 915,000 City Manager 1,651,679 1,282,568 78% 80% 51,119 81% 1,652,000 Admin Services 2,699,548 1,803,208 67% 83% 94,105 70% 2,700,000 Community Development 2,439,321 1,773,625 73% 90% 804,615 106% 2,439,000 Police 7,981,343 5,786,277 72% 88% 73% 7,981,000 4,565
Fire 4,078,497 3,225,175 79% 97% 1,767,971 122% 4,078,000 Library 894,667 1,201,910 74% 86% 8,484 75% 1,202,000
Museum 424,493 412,417 97% 108% - 97% 424,000
Recreation 1,802,832 1,143,345 63% 102% 3,872 64% 1,803,000 Public Works 4,531,191 3,161,634 70% 76% 270,198 76% 4,531,000 Total General Fund [Main] 35,036,798 $ 26,286,905 $ 75% 84% 3,384,793 $ 85% 35,036,000 $ Analysis: P10 expenses are slightly lower than budgeted due to Police, Public Works, Admin, Recreation, and Community Development operating under budget. Non Departmental is slightly higher due to a $1.5M PERS P.O.B. payment made at the beginning of the year. 55%
87%
61%
78%
67%
73%
72%
79%
74%
97%
63%
70%
75%
83%
City Council
Non Departmental
City Attorney
City Manager
Admin Services
Community Development
Police
Fire
Library
Museum
Recreation
Public Works
Total General Fund [Main]
Percent of Year Complete
Revised Budget / YTD % of Budget - By Department
PGCC 5-20-26
General Fund Expenditure Report - FY 2025-26 (Unaudited) Through April 2026
83% of Budget Year Complete
Expense Line Item
Revised
Budget YTD
YTD % of
Budget
Purchase
Orders
YTD % with
POs
Salaries 11,628,459 8,254,881 71% - 71%
Contract/Professional Services 6,661,694 5,441,545 82% 2,870,357 125% Unfunded Pension Liability 4,747,019 3,955,850 83% - 83% Debt Service 1,512,562 1,511,497 100% - 100%
Health Insurance 1,368,833 1,003,447 73% - 73%
Internal Service Charges 1,364,000 1,023,000 75% - 75%
Retirement (PERS) 1,150,254 850,231 74% - 74%
Fund Transfers Capital / Other 1,117,600 876,701 78% - 78% Legal Services / Retainer 966,000 624,457 65% 411,213 107% Utilities 900,968 699,076 78% - 78%
Repairs and Maintenance 682,892 205,593 30% 20,768 33%
Other Employee Benefits 634,618 499,220 79% - 79%
Equipment and Related Leases 519,780 154,231 30% 62,723 42% Supplies 461,800 294,210 64% 8,270 66%
Other Operating Costs 456,050 381,846 84% 6,876 85%
Software Licenses and Support 397,569 209,832 53% 4,586 54% Subscriptions and Memberships 285,200 204,209 72% - 72% Meetings / Travel / Training 181,500 97,078 53% - 53%
Grand Total 35,036,798 26,286,905 75% 3,384,793 85%
Analysis: P10 expenditures are below budget primarily due to savings in Salaries, Repairs, and Equipment.
Debt Service represents a $1.5M PERS P.O.B. payment made at the beginning of the year. 71%
82%
83%
100%
73%
75%
74%
78%
65%
78%
30%
79%
30%
64%
84%
53%
72%
53%
75%
83%
Salaries
Contract/Professional Services
Unfunded Pension Liability
Debt Service
Health Insurance
Internal Service Charges
Retirement (PERS)
Fund Transfers Capital / Other
Legal Services / Retainer
Utilities
Repairs and Maintenance
Other Employee Benefits
Equipment and Related Leases
Supplies
Other Operating Costs
Software Licenses and Support
Subscriptions and Memberships
Meetings / Travel / Training
Grand Total
Budget or Projected / YTD % of Budget - Major Expense Categories Percent of Year Complete
PGCC 5-20-26
Agenda No. 8 D
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: David Stiles, Senior Accountant
MEETING DATE: May 20, 2026
SUBJECT: FY26 Q3 Quarterly Investment Report
CEQA: {CEQA}
RECOMMENDATION
1. Receive the report.
2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
DISCUSSION
Article 19, Section (K) of the City Charter requires that a quarterly statement of all funds in the treasury be submitted to Council. The Quarterly Investment Report allows the Council and public to verify that the City's funds are invested in a safe and prudent manner, and the such investments comply with City policy and state law. The Investment Report is different from a budget report, as its purpose is to report on cash balances.
This report reflects the City's balances as of March 31st, 2026 and shows that cash and investments were held citywide, with a market value of $41,082,954. There was a $1,573,968 decrease in the cost basis of the City's investments from the prior quarter, and a $1,616,521 decrease in the fair market value of the City's investments from the prior quarter. All investments are in government securities, certificates of deposit (CD), or other approved investment vehicles. The maturity dates are laddered, to ensure liquidity. Investments that have matured will be reinvested according to the City's applicable policies. All bank balances are insured. The City does not actively trade either certificates of deposit or federal agency securities, but holds investments in the portfolio until maturity. The table below shows the activity for the quarter:
Date Description Security Type Rate Dollar Amt./Face Value Activity 01/12/26 Dort Financial Credit Union Certificate of Deposit 4.50% $247,000 Matured 02/11/26 Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Certificate of Deposit 0.45% $249,000 Matured 01/20/26 Liberty First Credit Union Certificate of Deposit 4.55% $249,000 Matured 03/16/26 Lyons National Bank Certificate of Deposit 4.75% $244,000 Matured 03/27/26 Truliant Federal Credit Union Certificate of Deposit 5.00% $247,000 Matured 01/15/26 United States Treasury U.S. Treasury Securities 0.00% $97,000 Matured The average yield on the City's portfolio for the quarter is 3.82%. This represents a yield rate that is 0.02% more than the prior quarter and 0.34% more than the same quarter of the prior year.
The Investment Report is also available on the City's website.
OPTIONS
N/A - This is informational only.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact. This is informational only.
PGCC 5-20-26
FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.
Attachments
FY26 Q3 Investment Report
PGCC 5-20-26
City of Pacific Grove
California Interim Investment Report
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2026
City of Pacific Grove
300 Forest Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
www.cityofpacificgrove.org
PGCC 5-20-26
Matthew Mogensen
City Manager
Table of Contents
Investment Summary ......................................... 3 Investment Compliance Report ......................... 4 LAIF Pool Background ......................................... 6 Economic Trends ................................................ 7 Investment Details ............................................. 9 Long Term Investment Restrictions
Only debt reserve funds may be invested in
securities exceeding five years without prior
Council approval, so long as their maturities
coincide with the expected use of funds.
Liquidity Objectives
The City’s investments will remain liquid to enable
it to meet all operating requirements which might
be reasonably anticipated. Maturities of some
investments for which there is limited opportunity
for resale shall be staggered to maximize liquidity.
Safety Objectives
The City’s investments shall be overseen in a
manner to ensure preservation of capital in the
portfolio. The City will diversify its funds among
a variety of securities with varying maturities.
Additional Resources for Information
Website: cityofpacificgrove.org
Facebook: CityofPacificGrove
X/Twitter: @PacificGrove
The City of Pacific Grove
presents its investment report
for the current fiscal year,
including details on types of
securities held and maturities
of its investments, as well as
reporting on compliance with
the City’s investment policy
and recent market conditions.
Cash Overview
The City pools its cash for investment purposes.
Highly liquid market investments with maturities
of one year or less at time of purchase are stated
at amortized cost. All other investments are stated
at fair value. Certain restricted funds, held by
outside firms through agreements with the City,
are not pooled and reported as restricted cash.
Investment Reporting Standards
The City reports its investments in accordance
with its investment policy, which has been
adopted by the Council. The policy is designed
to meet the standards of the Government
Finance Officers Association (GFOA), California
Municipal Treasurer’s Association (CMTA)
California Debt and Investment Advisory
Committee (CDIAC) and the Association of
Professional Treasurers of the United States and
Canada (APTUSC).
Yield Objectives
The objective is to attain a established benchmark
or an acceptable rate of return commensurate
with the City’s risk constraints identified in its
investment policy and its cash flow requirements.
Welcome Message
From the
City Manager
City of Pacific Grove
Investment Report
Fiscal Year 2025-26
PGCC 5-20-26
% of % Book Market
Institution Category Rating Total Yield Value Value
Cash Deposits
Petty Cash 0.10% 0.00% 1,045 1,045
Bank of America - Sweep Checking 100% 2.56% 1,044,286 1,044,286 Total Cash Deposits 100% 2.56% 1,045,331 1,045,331
Investments - Yount Trust
Money Market Uncategorized Not Rated 0% 3.28% 1,448 1,448 U.S. Government Bonds Level 2 AA/AAA 100% 1.56% 840,286 840,263 Total Investments - Yount Trust 100% 1.56% 841,734 841,711 Investments - Other City Wide
State Local Agency Fund (LAIF) Uncategorized Not Rated 54% 4.40% 21,257,837 21,257,837 Dreyfus Money Market (TVI) Uncategorized Not Rated 1% 0.00% 500,930 500,930 Columbia Bank Money Market Uncategorized Not Rated 5% 0.01% 2,024,006 2,024,006 Mututal Funds Uncategorized Not Rated 12% 3.66% 4,548,304 4,548,304 Certificates of Deposit Level 2 Not Rated 14% 3.86% 5,457,000 5,477,224 U.S. Government Bonds Level 2 AA/AAA 13% 3.90% 5,103,327 5,138,870 U.S. Treasury Securities Level 1 AA/AAA 1% 0.75% 250,021 248,740 Total Investments - Other City Wide 100% 3.87% 39,141,425 39,195,911 Total Cash and Investments - City Wide 3.82% 41,028,491 41,082,954 Difference in Cost/Market Value 54,464 0.13%
Net Deposits / (Withdrawals) for Quarter (1,616,521) (1,573,968) As required under State law, the City is able to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.
City of Pacific Grove
Cash and Investments Summary - All Funds
As of March 31, 2026
52%
17%
13%
13%
5%
Distribution of Cash and Investments
LAIF
Money Market / Mutual Funds
CDS
US Bonds
Bank Balances / Other
PGCC 5-20-26
City of Pacific Grove, California
Investment Disclosures and Compliance Review
Overview of Investment Policy
The following provides a summary of the City’s investment policy, which provides guidelines that City staff follow in placing investments. Investments of bond proceeds are governed by the debt issue covenants. Per the City investment policy, any investments temporarily in non-compliance will be addressed in subsequent months. The City is projected to have sufficient funds to meet its expenses for the next six months.
Investment Type
Maximum % or $ of Portfolio
Or In One Issuer
Minimum
Required
Rating
Maximum
Maturity
Agency in
Compliance?
Demand Deposits None None 5 years Yes
U.S. Treasuries None N/A 5 years Yes
U.S. Agencies None N/A 5 years Yes
Joint Powers Agency
Pool
100% - CAMP/CalTrust None N/A N/A
Money Market Funds 20% AAA N/A No
Bankers Acceptances 40% (10% with one institution) A1/P1 180 days None Held Commercial Paper 25% (10% with one firm) A1/P1 270 days None Held Placement Service /
Negotiable CDs
50% /
30% (10% with one bank)
A1 < 1 year
A for 1-5 years
5 years Yes
LAIF Per State Statute
$75 million per account
N/A N/A Yes
State / Local Agency
Debt Issues
None AA (except City
bonds)
5 years None Held
County Pool 100% None N/A None Held
PGCC 5-20-26
City of Pacific Grove, California
Investment Disclosures and Compliance Review
• Certificates of Deposit - Non-Negotiable Certificates of Deposits will be made only in FDIC or FSLIC insured accounts. For deposits in excess of the insured maximum of $250,000, approved collateral shall be required in accordance with Government Code 53652 and/or 53651 (m) (1). Investment in these instruments shall be limited to financial institutions that, in the Treasurer’s judgement, are of high quality, and shall not have a term exceeding five years from the date of purchase.
• Securities of the U.S. Government or its Agencies - Includes obligations issued by Federal Home Loan Banks, Government National Mortgage Association, Farm Credit System, the Federal Home Loan Bank, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association, Federal National Mortgage Association, or obligations or other instruments of or issued by a federal agency or a United States Government sponsored enterprise. • Treasury Bills and Notes - U.S. Treasury Bills, Notes, Bonds, or Certificates of Indebtedness, or those for which the full faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest. • Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) - Investment of funds in the California LAIF which allows the State Treasurer to invest through the Pooled Money Investment Account (PMIA). Maximum investment is subject to state regulation. LAIF determines fair value on its investment portfolio based on market quotations for those securities where market quotations are readily available and based on amortized cost or best estimate for those securities where market value is not readily available. LAIF is reported at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
Custodial Credit Risk
For an investment, custodial credit risk is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterparty, the City will not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The California Government Code and the City's investment policy do not contain legal or policy requirements that would limit the exposure to custodial credit risk for investments. With respect to investments, custodial credit risk generally applies only to direct investments in marketable securities. Custodial credit risk does not apply to a local government's indirect investment in securities through the use of mutual funds or government investment pools (such as LAIF).
Fair Value of Investments
The three levels of the fair value measurement hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 – Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for assets liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.
Level 2 – Inputs, observable for the assets through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs reflecting the City’s best estimate of market pricing at the measurement date.
Federal Agency Securities and corporate bonds categorized as Level 2 are valued based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuations for which all significant assumptions are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
PGCC 5-20-26
March 3.826
February 3.871
January 3.931
December 4.025
November 4.096
October 4.150
PMIA Average Life(1)
: 261
LAIF Fair Value Factor(1)
: 0.999980831
PMIA Daily
(1)
: 3.82
PMIA Quarter to Date(1)
: 3.92
LAIF Apportionment Rate(2)
: 3.98
LAIF Earnings Ratio(2)
: 0.00010906180047888
LAIF Administrative Cost(1)*
: TBD
Treasuries
56.86%
Agencies
21.79%
Certificates of
Deposit/Bank Notes
10.77%
Time
Deposits
3.31%
Commercial
Paper
6.52%
Corporate
Bonds
0.59%
Loans
0.16%
Notes: The apportionment rate includes interest earned on the CalPERS Supplemental Pension Payment pursuant to Government Code 20825 (c)(1) .
*The percentage of administrative cost equals the total administrative cost divided by the quarterly interest earnings. The law provides that administrative costs are not to exceed 5% of quarterly EARNINGS of the fund. However, if the 13-week Daily Treasury Bill Rate on the last day of the fiscal year is below 1%, then administrative costs shall not exceed 8% of quarterly EARNINGS of the fund for the subsequent fiscal year.
Source:
(1) State of California, Office of the Treasurer
(2) State of California, Office of the Controller
PMIA Average Monthly
Effective Yields(1)
PMIA/LAIF Performance Report
as of 04/15/26
Daily rates are now available here. View PMIA Daily Rates Quarterly Performance
Quarter Ended 03/31/26
Chart does not include $829,000.00 in mortgages, which equates to 0.001%. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.
Pooled Money Investment Account
Monthly Portfolio Composition (1)
3/31/26
$165.3 billion
PGCC 5-20-26
Monthly Market Review
Information provided by CAMP’s Program Administrator PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
CAMP® is a registered trademark and the CAMP logos and designs are trademarks owned by the California Asset Management Trust (Trust). This information is for institutional investor use only, not for further distribution to retail investors, and does not represent an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any fund or other security. Investors should consider the Trust’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses before investing in the Trust. This and other information about the Trust is available in the Trust’s current Information Statement, which should be read carefully before investing. A copy of the Trust’s Information Statement may be obtained by calling 1-800-729-7665 or is available on the Trust’s website at www.camponline.com. While the Cash Reserve Portfolio seeks to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share and the CAMP Term Portfolio seeks to achieve a net asset value of $1.00 per share at the stated maturity, it is possible to lose money investing in the Trust. An investment in the Trust is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Shares of the Trust are distributed by U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc., member FINRA (www.finra.org) and SIPC (www.sipc.org). PFM Asset Management is a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc., which serves as administrator and investment adviser to the Trust. U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. is a direct subsidiary of U.S. Bank N.A. and an indirect subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. is a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp and affiliate of U.S. Bank N.A.
Markets reflect on conflict in Iran.
Economic Highlights
• Geopolitics dominated markets in March amid the escalating Middle East conflict and near-closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical energy chokepoint which handles roughly 20% of global seaborne oil trade. Brent crude ended March at $118 per barrel, up more than 60% for the month. Volatility also spiked across energy, fixed-income, and global equity markets.
• The initial market reaction focused on the potential inflationary impact of higher energy prices While still too early to assess the full economic impact, sustained energy cost pressures could weigh on consumer sentiment and discretionary spending if the conflict persists.
• The Federal Open Market Committee (Fed or FOMC) met in March and held the target rate unchanged at 3.50%–3.75%, as expected. Policymakers acknowledged heightened uncertainty stemming from the conflict and communicated a patient, data-dependent approach. The “dot plot” showed several individual projections shifting toward fewer or no rate cuts, though the median expectation remained for one additional 25 basis point (bps) cut in 2026.
• Market expectations for Fed policy fluctuated wildly in March. The month began with markets pricing two or three cuts in 2026 but ended the month pushing the next expected rate cut into 2027.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s measured “wait and see” commentary tempered these hawkish expectations, leaving the market priced for a prolonged hold.
• While too early to reflect the cascading impact of higher oil prices, consumer price inflation data for February was broadly in line with recent readings. Notably, producer prices jumped significantly more than expected, rising 0.7% month-over-month and highlighting renewed upstream price pressures. • The labor market showed renewed resilience in March with payrolls rebounding after contracting in February. Other labor indicators such as initial jobless claims held near historically low levels and continuing claims declined. The unemployment rate edged down to 4.3%, reinforcing the persistence of a "low-hire, low-fire" environment. However, elevated energy prices pose potential risks to hiring momentum ahead.
Interest Rates
• U.S. Treasury yields increased and the yield curve steepened as investors repriced their Fed policy outlook driven by geopolitical turmoil and renewed inflation concerns. The yield on 3-month, 2-year, and 10-year U.S. Treasuries ended the month at 3.67%,
3.79%, and 4.32%, representing increases of +2 bps, +42 bps, and +38 bps, respectively.
• Longer duration bond indices bore the brunt of rising yields as higher rates pressured market values. The ICE BofA 3-month, 2-year, and 10-year U.S. Treasury indices returned +0.29%, -0.49%, and -2.52%, respectively.
Equity Markets
• Equity market volatility jumped to its highest level since April 2025 amid de-risking sentiment. For the month, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by -5.2%, the S&P 500 Index was down -5.0%, and the Nasdaq dipped -4.7%.
• After strong relative performance over the prior 12 months, international equities underperformed domestic counterparts in March as the MSCI ACWI ex U.S. Net Index declined -10.8%.
PFMAM Strategy Recap & Outlook
• While future Fed policy remains uncertain amid the ongoing conflict, we view the meaningful rise in interest rates and the steeper curve as an opportunity, particularly for strategies inside five years.
As a result, we will look to target portfolio durations at 101-105% of benchmarks. For longer-duration strategies beyond five years, we believe the risk profile is less favorable relative to shorter strategies. As such, we expect to maintain durations near 100% of benchmarks.
• Spreads on federal agencies and supranationals remain narrow, although callable spreads have widened modestly due to increased market volatility. New supply is expected to be focused in the money market space and likely to remain limited beyond one year. • In response to geopolitical tensions, heightened issuance, and concerns over private debt capital, investment-grade (IG) corporate bond spreads widened noticeably in March and pushed excess returns firmly negative. Despite these factors, fundamentals remain solid and the technical backdrop is supportive. Combined with cheaper valuations, we find the sector more attractive and anticipate adding via both new issues and secondary markets. • Spreads on asset-backed securities (ABS) widened marginally over the month despite the negative market sentiment. Solid consumer fundamentals and credit enhancements are expected to insulate the sector from meaningful downturns.
• Mortgage-backed securities (MBS) generated negative excess returns over the month as higher yields and a spike in bond volatility weighed on the sector. Conversely, the less interest-rate sensitive agency CMBS sector largely broke even over the month.
• Credit spreads on the short end of the curve widened significantly over the month. Maturities in the 9-12 month range offer attractive all-in yields, particularly for investors anticipating the next Fed policy move will be a rate cut.
Fixed Income | April 2026
PGCC 5-20-26
PFM Asset Management is a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. | For Institutional Investor or Investment Professional Use Only This material is not for inspection by, distribution to, or quotation to the general public.
Indices shown are not available for investment. The index data reference herein is the property of the index provider and/or its licensors. The index provider assumes no liability in connections with its use and does not sponsor, endorse or recommend the products or services contained herein. Index returns do not reflect payment of any sales charges or fees an investor would pay to purchase the securities they represent. The imposition of these fees and charges would cause investment performance to be lower than the performance shown.
The views expressed within this material constitute the perspective and judgment of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. at the time of distribution and are subject to change. Any forecast, projection, or prediction of the market, the economy, economic trends, and equity or fixed-income markets are based upon current opinion as of the date of issue and are also subject to change.
Opinions and data presented are not necessarily indicative of future events or expected performance. Information contained herein is based on data obtained from recognized statistical services, issuer reports or communications, or other sources, believed to be reliable. No representation is made as to its accuracy or completeness.
NOT FDIC INSURED : NO BANK GUARANTEE : MAY LOSE VALUE
Spot Prices and Benchmark Rates
Index Mar 31,
2025
Feb 28,
2026
Mar 31,
2026
Monthly
Change
1-Month SOFR 4.32% 3.67% 3.66% -0.01%
3-Month SOFR 4.29% 3.67% 3.68% 0.01%
Effective Fed Funds Rate 4.33% 3.64% 3.64% 0.00%
Fed Funds Target Rate 4.50% 3.75% 3.75% 0.00%
Gold ($/oz) $3,123 $5,248 $4,648 -$600
Crude Oil ($/Barrel) $71.48 $67.02 $101.38 $34.36
U.S. Dollars per Euro $1.08 $1.18 $1.16 -$0.02
U.S. Treasury Yields
Maturity Mar 31,
2025
Feb 28,
2026
Mar 31,
2026
Monthly
Change
3-Month 4.30% 3.66% 3.68% 0.02%
6-Month 4.23% 3.62% 3.70% 0.08%
2-Year 3.89% 3.38% 3.80% 0.42%
5-Year 3.95% 3.50% 3.94% 0.44%
10-Year 4.21% 3.94% 4.32% 0.38%
30-Year 4.57% 4.61% 4.91% 0.30%
Yields by Sector and Maturity
Maturity U.S.
Treasury
Federal
Agency
CorporatesAA-A IndustrialsAAA
Municipals
3-Month 3.68% 3.69% 4.14% -
6-Month 3.70% 3.70% 4.15% -
2-Year 3.80% 3.81% 4.18% 2.10%
5-Year 3.94% 3.95% 4.55% 2.19%
10-Year 4.32% 4.38% 5.04% 2.66%
30-Year 4.91% - 5.79% 3.87%
Economic Indicators
Indicator Release
Date Period Actual Survey(Median)
Existing Home Sales MoM 10-Mar Feb 1.70% -0.80%
CPI YoY 11-Mar Feb 2.40% 2.40%
GDP Annualized QoQ 13-Mar 4Q S 0.70% 1.40%
PCE YoY 13-Mar Jan 2.80% 2.90%
FOMC Rate Decision 18-Mar Mar 3.75% 3.75%
U. of Mich. Consumer Sentiment 27-Mar Mar F 53.3 54
Change in Nonfarm Payrolls 3-Apr Mar 178k 65k
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
5.5%
U.S. Treasury Yield Curve
3/31/2025
2/28/2026
3/31/2026
3-mo 2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 30-yr
-0.75% -0.57%
0.10%
-0.99%
-0.36%
3.86% 3.95%
5.53%
3.57%
5.26%
1-5 Year Treasury 1-5 Year Agency 1-5 Year AAA-A
Corp
1-5 Year
Municipals
0-5 Year MBS
ICE BofA Fixed Income Index Returns
March Prior 12 Months
-1.8%
-5.0% -5.0%
-10.3%
3.2%
17.8%
25.8%
21.3%
ICE BofA U.S. Treasury
Master Index
S&P 500 Russell 2000
(Small Cap)
MSCI EAFE
(Developed
Europe/Asia)
Total Return of Major Indices
March Prior 12 Months
3.5%
3.6%
3.7%
3.8%
3.9%
4.0%
4.1%
4.2%
4.3%
4.4%
4.5%
Mar '25 Jun '25 Sep '25 Dec '25 Mar '26
30-Day Money Market Yields
Commercial Paper (A1/P1) Federal Agency U.S. T-Bill
Source: Bloomberg. Data as of March 31, 2026, unless otherwise noted.
PGCC 5-20-26
TVI Platinum Reporting Prepared for:
City of Pacific Grove
As of March 31, 2026
Recipient Info: Provider Info:
Time Value Investments, Inc.
9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 610
Seattle, WA 98115
Disclaimer:
9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 610
Seattle, WA 98115 (877) 707-7787 http://www.timevalueinv.com/ Information contained within investment reports provided by Time Value Investments, Inc (TVI) are believed to be reliable but may not have been independently verified. TVI does not guaranty, represent or warrant, or accept any responsibility or liability as to, the accuracy, completeness or appropriateness of the information contained in these reports. Information contained herein may not be current due to, among other things, changes in the financial markets or economic environment. Opinions reflected in these reports are subject to change without notice. Forecasts represent estimates.
Investing carries risk of losses. Information provided by Time Value Investments does not constitute, and should not be used as a substitute for, tax, legal or investment advice. Clients retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies, implementing and enforcing internal controls and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions. Market prices on TVI reports are typically derived from the client's custodian's reports. Client is encouraged to confirm that market values on this report match those on custodian’s report. Although TVI believes the prices to be reliable, the values of the securities do not always represent the prices at which the securities could have been bought or sold.
Callable securities are subject to redemption prior to maturity and may be redeemed in whole or in part before maturity by the issuer, which could affect the yield represented. Certain call dates may not appear on the report if the call date has passed and if the security is continuously callable. Information provided for credit ratings is based upon a good faith inquiry of selected sources, but its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. All opinions expressed in this report constitute the judgments as of the dates indicated and are subject to change without notice.
This report is for informative purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any product. Investment in securities involves risks, including the possible loss of the amount invested. None of the securities in this portfolio are in any way guaranteed from loss.
All information is believed to be from reliable sources. However, Cetera Advisor Networks makes no representation as to its completeness or accuracy. Please keep your original, official statement(s) in a safe, secure location.
Data is provided by US Bank (add any other sources) and is not guaranteed or provided by Cetera.
Cetera Advisor Networks and Cetera Investment Advisers exclusively provide investment products and services through its representatives. Although Cetera does not provide tax or legal advice, or supervise tax, accounting or legal services, Cetera representatives may offer these services through their independent outside business. This information is not intended as tax or legal advice.
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY
PGCC 5-20-26
City Of Pacific Grove
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY
Wgtd Avg YTM * 3.77% Sector Par Value YTM * Weight
Wgtd Avg YTM with Liq. Bal.* 3.67% Agencies 5,561,000 3.82% 35.2% Wgtd Avg YTW ** 3.77% Treasuries 250,000 0.70% 1.6%
Wgtd Avg Mat (no call) 1.83 yrs Certificates of Deposit 5,457,000 3.86% 34.5% Wgtd Avg Mat with Liq. Bal. 1.3 yrs Municipal Bonds
Wgtd Avg Mat (all called) 1.73 yrs Corporate Bonds
Mortgages
Commercial Paper
Market Value 3/31/2026 11,343,278 Supra Nationals
Total 11,268,000 3.77% 71.2%
Balance Rate Weight
Par Value 11,268,000 Money Market 4,548,303 3.42% 28.8% Liquid Balances 4,548,303
Total Par with Liquid Bal. 15,816,303
Current MV with Liquid Bal. 15,891,581
4,548,303 3.42% 28.8% *** All ratings are shown in S&P format. * Purchase Yield to Maturity ** Purchase Yield to Worst Ratings Do Not Include Liquid Balances. 0 - 3mo 3 - 6mo 6 - 12mo 1 - 2yr 2 - 3yr 3 - 4yr 4 - 5yr 5 - 7yr 7 - 10yr Over 10yr As of As of
3/31/2026 1Mo Ago 3Mos Ago 6Mos Ago 12/31/2025 1Yr Ago 3Yrs Ago 5Yrs Ago Cusip Reason Yield to Maturity:
Portfolio 3.77% 3.82% 3.66% 3.35% 3.66% 3.38% n/a n/a
2-Year Treasury 3.82% 3.38% 3.47% 3.60% 3.47% 3.89% 4.06% 0.16% Fed Funds 3.75% 3.75% 3.75% 4.25% 3.75% 4.50% 5.00% 0.25% Maturity Distribution
Portfolio Summary Portfolio Composition (incl. Liquid Balances) Portfolio Ratings (Worst***) Account Name
Total Liquid Balances
9Mos Ago
3.26%
1Yr Average
n/a
3.67%
Performance versus Benchmark as of 3/31/2026 Excluded Securities
3.72%
4.19% 4.50%
Bonds that are not found
will not be shown
$.9MM
$.2MM
$1.9MM
$3.6MM
$3.0MM
$1.7MM
$0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0
$0
$.5MM
$1.MM
$1.5MM
$2.MM
$2.5MM
$3.MM
$3.5MM
$4.MM
51.6%
48.4%
AA+ NR
35.2%
34.5% 1.6%
28.8%
Agencies Treasuries Certificates of Deposit Liquid Balances 2 Report Date: 3/31/2026
PGCC 5-20-26
City Of Pacific Grove
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY
Type Par May-26 Jun-26 Sep-26 Oct-26 Nov-26 Dec-26 Jan-27 Feb-27 Mar-27 Callable 1,047,000 170,744 0 0 0 0 0 637,078 0 0
Non-Callable 10,221,000 280,744 517,649 35,678 35,074 527,124 513,467 50,133 19,118 280,769 TOTAL 11,268,000 451,488 517,649 35,678 35,074 527,124 513,467 687,211 19,118 280,769 Interest Payments
Principal Payments
Cash-Flows - from 04/2026 to 03/2027 - Assuming None Called Apr-26 Jul-26 Aug-26
35,614 312,707 22,490
35,614 302,629 22,490
0 10,078 0
0 10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 Jul-26 Aug-26 Sep-26 Oct-26 Nov-26 Dec-26 Jan-27 Feb-27 Mar-27 0 100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 Jul-26 Aug-26 Sep-26 Oct-26 Nov-26 Dec-26 Jan-27 Feb-27 Mar-27 3 Report Date: 3/31/2026
PGCC 5-20-26
City Of Pacific Grove
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY
Type Par May-26 Jun-26 Sep-26 Oct-26 Nov-26 Dec-26 Jan-27 Feb-27 Mar-27 Callable 1,047,000 170,744 0 0 0 0 0 631,609 0 0
Non-Callable 10,221,000 280,744 517,649 35,678 35,074 527,124 513,467 50,133 19,118 280,769 TOTAL 11,268,000 451,488 517,649 35,678 35,074 527,124 513,467 681,742 19,118 280,769 * Likelihood based on 03/31/2026 market rates
Cash-Flows - from 04/2026 to 03/2027 - Recognizing Likelihood of Call* Apr-26 Jul-26 Aug-26
35,614 302,629 22,490
Interest Payments
Principal Payments
0 260,078 0
35,614 562,707 22,490
0 10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 Jul-26 Aug-26 Sep-26 Oct-26 Nov-26 Dec-26 Jan-27 Feb-27 Mar-27 0 100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 Jul-26 Aug-26 Sep-26 Oct-26 Nov-26 Dec-26 Jan-27 Feb-27 Mar-27 4 Report Date: 3/31/2026
PGCC 5-20-26
City Of Pacific Grove
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY
# Cusip Par Value Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 Jul-26 Aug-26 Sep-26 Oct-26 Nov-26 Dec-26 Jan-27 Feb-27 Mar-27 Year 1 Total 1 3133EMZC9* 170,000 0 170,744 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 170,744 2 91282CCF6 250,000 0 250,938 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,938 3 02007GSU8 246,000 0 0 249,680 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 249,680 4 90348JN48 249,000 159 153 249,159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 249,471 5 649447UZ0 249,000 0 0 0 249,864 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 249,864 6 25460FDV5 249,000 1,005 972 1,005 972 1,005 1,005 972 250,005 0 0 0 0 256,941 7 07181JAV6 248,000 1,053 1,019 1,053 1,019 1,053 1,053 1,019 249,053 0 0 0 0 256,322 8 87164WH84 248,000 0 0 1,546 0 0 0 0 0 249,554 0 0 0 251,100 9 052392CH8 249,000 1,047 1,013 1,047 1,013 1,047 1,047 1,013 1,047 250,013 0 0 0 258,287 10 3133ENKG4* 530,000 0 0 0 3,896 0 0 0 0 0 533,896 0 0 537,792 11 3133ENKG4* 97,000 0 0 0 713 0 0 0 0 0 97,713 0 0 98,426 12 15118RE78 249,000 994 962 994 962 994 994 962 994 962 994 994 249,898 260,704 13 32116QBK1 244,000 0 5,384 0 0 0 0 0 5,474 0 0 0 0 10,858 14 254673G34 246,000 0 0 3,864 0 0 0 0 0 3,885 0 0 0 7,749 15 58404DSN2 249,000 952 921 952 921 952 952 921 952 921 952 952 860 11,208 16 438649AJ4 249,000 983 952 983 952 983 983 952 983 952 983 983 888 11,577 17 02589ADB5 246,000 0 0 0 3,965 0 0 0 0 0 4,030 0 0 7,995 18 90352RCU7 249,000 819 846 819 846 846 819 846 819 846 846 764 846 9,962 19 31422XH70 334,000 6,329 0 0 0 0 0 6,329 0 0 0 0 0 12,658 20 914098DJ4 249,000 888 860 888 860 888 888 860 888 860 888 831 860 10,459 21 01664MAB2 249,000 931 900 931 900 931 931 900 931 900 931 931 840 10,957 22 51828MAC8 249,000 952 921 952 921 952 952 921 952 921 952 952 860 11,208 23 45157PAZ3 249,000 952 921 952 921 952 952 921 952 921 952 890 921 11,207 24 01882MAA0 249,000 1,026 993 1,026 993 1,026 1,026 993 1,026 993 1,026 960 993 12,081 25 82671DAB3 249,000 931 900 931 900 931 931 900 931 900 931 931 840 10,957 26 61690U3L2 244,000 0 0 0 0 0 6,027 0 0 0 0 0 5,929 11,956 27 91527PBW6 249,000 867 839 867 839 867 867 839 867 839 867 867 783 10,208 28 3130AXEL8 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 5,938 0 0 0 0 0 5,938 11,876 29 3133EPF91 500,000 0 11,250 0 0 0 0 0 11,250 0 0 0 0 22,500 30 3130AYJ31** 250,000 0 0 0 255,469 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 255,469 31 3133EPW84 750,000 0 0 0 14,531 0 0 0 0 0 14,531 0 0 29,062 32 3133ERQD6 500,000 0 0 0 0 9,063 0 0 0 0 0 9,063 0 18,126 33 3133EP5J0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 10,313 0 0 0 0 0 10,313 20,626 34 3133EPXV2 180,000 4,163 0 0 0 0 0 4,163 0 0 0 0 0 8,326 35 3133EPXV2 500,000 11,563 0 0 0 0 0 11,563 0 0 0 0 0 23,126 36 3133ERKX8 1,000,000 0 0 0 21,250 0 0 0 0 0 21,250 0 0 42,500 TOTAL 11,268,000 35,614 451,488 517,649 562,707 22,490 35,678 35,074 527,124 513,467 681,742 19,118 280,769 3,682,920 * Callable - currently not likely to be called See Cash-Flows graph above "Recognizing Likelihood of Call" for current projected cash-flows ** Callable - currently likely to be called
Extended Cash-Flows
5 Report Date: 3/31/2026
PGCC 5-20-26
City Of Pacific Grove
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY
Estimated Estimated
# CUSIP/Sec-ID Sec Desc 1 Weight Par Value Coupon * Settle Dt Mat Dt Nxt Call Dt Rating *** YTM ** YTW ** Duration Call Type Bps to Call Redem. Date 0 Total Liquid Balances 28.8% 4,548,303
1 3133EMZC9 FFCB 1.1% 170,000 0.875 5/13/2021 5/13/2026 4/7/2026 AA+ 0.84 0.84 0.11 Anytime (169) 5/13/2026 2 91282CCF6 T 1.6% 250,000 0.750 7/16/2021 5/31/2026 AA+ 0.70 0.70 0.16 5/31/2026 3 02007GSU8 ALLY BK SANDY UTAH CD 1.6% 246,000 3.000 6/9/2022 6/9/2026 NR 3.00 3.00 0.19 6/9/2026 4 90348JN48 UBS BK USA SALT LAKECITY UT CD 1.6% 249,000 0.750 6/23/2021 6/23/2026 NR 0.75 0.75 0.22 6/23/2026 5 649447UZ0 FLAGSTAR BANK NATIONAL A 1.6% 249,000 0.700 6/30/2021 7/1/2026 NR 0.70 0.70 0.25 7/1/2026 6 25460FDV5 DIRECT FED CR UN NEEDHAM MA 1.6% 249,000 4.750 11/7/2022 11/9/2026 NR 4.75 4.75 0.60 11/9/2026 7 07181JAV6 BAXTER CR UN VERNON HILLS ILL 1.6% 248,000 5.000 11/28/2022 11/30/2026 NR 5.00 5.00 0.65 11/30/2026 8 87164WH84 SYNCHRONY BANK CD 1.6% 248,000 1.250 12/10/2021 12/10/2026 NR 1.25 1.25 0.68 12/10/2026 9 052392CH8 AUSTIN TELCO FED CR UN TEX 1.6% 249,000 4.950 12/16/2022 12/16/2026 NR 4.95 4.95 0.69 12/16/2026 10 3133ENKG4 FFCB 3.4% 530,000 1.470 1/31/2022 1/11/2027 4/7/2026 AA+ 1.67 1.67 0.76 Anytime (234) 1/11/2027 11 3133ENKG4 FFCB 0.6% 97,000 1.470 1/27/2022 1/11/2027 4/7/2026 AA+ 1.67 1.67 0.76 Anytime (234) 1/11/2027 12 15118RE78 CELTIC BK SALT LAKE CITY UTAH 1.6% 249,000 4.700 3/17/2023 3/17/2027 NR 4.70 4.70 0.94 3/17/2027 13 32116QBK1 FIRST NATL BK MIDDLETENN CD 1.5% 244,000 4.450 5/23/2023 5/19/2027 NR 4.45 4.45 1.09 5/19/2027 14 254673G34 CAPITAL ONE NATL ASSN VA CD 1.6% 246,000 3.150 6/7/2022 6/7/2027 NR 3.15 3.15 1.14 6/7/2027 15 58404DSN2 MEDALLION BK UTAH CD 1.6% 249,000 4.500 6/16/2023 6/16/2027 NR 4.50 4.50 1.17 6/16/2027 16 438649AJ4 HONOLULU FIRE DEPT FED CR UN 1.6% 249,000 4.650 6/22/2023 6/22/2027 NR 4.65 4.65 1.19 6/22/2027 17 02589ADB5 AMERICAN EXPRESS NATL BK BR 1.6% 246,000 3.250 7/13/2022 7/13/2027 NR 3.25 3.25 1.24 7/13/2027 18 90352RCU7 USALLIANCE FCU RYE NEW YORK 1.6% 249,000 4.000 9/30/2022 9/30/2027 NR 4.00 4.00 1.45 9/30/2027 19 31422XH70 FAMCA 2.1% 334,000 3.790 11/22/2023 10/4/2027 AA+ 4.50 4.50 1.43 10/4/2027 20 914098DJ4 UNIVERSITY BK ANN ARBOR MICH 1.6% 249,000 4.200 11/30/2022 11/30/2027 NR 4.20 4.20 1.60 11/30/2027 21 01664MAB2 ALL IN FED CR UN DALEVILLE 1.6% 249,000 4.400 12/20/2022 12/20/2027 NR 4.40 4.40 1.65 12/20/2027 22 51828MAC8 LATINO CMNTY CR UN DURHAM NOR 1.6% 249,000 4.500 12/21/2022 12/21/2027 NR 4.50 4.50 1.65 12/21/2027 23 45157PAZ3 IDEAL CR UN WOODBURYMN 1.6% 249,000 4.500 12/29/2022 12/29/2027 NR 4.50 4.50 1.67 12/29/2027 24 01882MAA0 ALLIANT CR UN CHICAGO IL 1.6% 249,000 4.850 12/30/2022 12/30/2027 NR 4.85 4.85 1.67 12/30/2027 25 82671DAB3 SIGNATURE FED CR UN ALEXANDRIA 1.6% 249,000 4.400 1/31/2023 1/31/2028 NR 4.40 4.40 1.75 1/31/2028 26 61690U3L2 MORGAN STANLEY BK N A CD 1.5% 244,000 4.900 3/24/2023 3/23/2028 NR 4.90 4.90 1.87 3/23/2028 27 91527PBW6 UNIVEST NATL BK TR SOUDERTON 1.6% 249,000 4.100 5/5/2023 5/5/2028 NR 4.10 4.10 1.99 5/5/2028 28 3130AXEL8 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK M1-2028 1.6% 250,000 4.750 10/31/2023 9/8/2028 AA+ 4.77 4.77 2.29 9/8/2028 29 3133EPF91 FFCB 3.2% 500,000 4.500 11/27/2023 11/27/2028 AA+ 4.40 4.40 2.45 11/27/2028 30 3130AYJ31 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK TU-2029 1.6% 250,000 4.375 1/17/2024 1/17/2029 7/17/2026 AA+ 4.24 4.12 0.29 49 7/17/2026 Portfolio Details - Sorted by Maturity
Maturity Distribution
8.1%
2.2%
16.6%
31.5%
26.6%
14.9%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0 - 3mo 3 - 6mo 6 - 12mo 1 - 2yr 2 - 3yr 3 - 4yr 4 - 5yr 5 - 7yr 7 - 10yr Over 10yr 6 Report Date: 3/31/2026
PGCC 5-20-26
City Of Pacific Grove
Portfolio Details - Sorted by Maturity
31 3133EPW84 FFCB 4.7% 750,000 3.875 1/18/2024 1/18/2029 AA+ 3.92 3.92 2.61 1/18/2029 32 3133ERQD6 FFCB 3.2% 500,000 3.625 8/20/2024 2/20/2029 AA+ 3.61 3.61 2.71 2/20/2029 33 3133EP5J0 FFCB 3.2% 500,000 4.125 3/21/2024 3/12/2029 AA+ 4.22 4.22 2.75 3/12/2029 34 3133EPXV2 FFCB 1.1% 180,000 4.625 4/30/2024 4/5/2029 AA+ 4.66 4.66 2.74 4/5/2029 35 3133EPXV2 FFCB 3.2% 500,000 4.625 4/26/2024 4/5/2029 AA+ 4.65 4.65 2.74 4/5/2029 36 3133ERKX8 FFCB 6.3% 1,000,000 4.250 7/22/2024 7/12/2029 AA+ 4.09 4.09 3.02 7/12/2029 TOTAL and AVERAGES 100.0% 15,816,303 1.83 yrs 1.73 yrs 3.77 3.77 1.66 * Semi-Annual interest payment ** Yields calculated using cost price, at settlement date *** Ratings Shown Are: Lowest Rating in S&P format, NR AGY = Non-Rated U.S. Government Agency 7 Report Date: 3/31/2026
PGCC 5-20-26
City Of Pacific Grove
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY
Callables purchased at Discount
3133EKPP5
3133EKTT3
* Securities only
Unrealized
# CUSIP/Sec-ID Sec Desc 1 Cpn Mat Dt Par Value Cost Purch Px Book Val Book Px Book YTM Mkt Val Mkt Px Mkt YTM Gain/Loss 1 3133EMZC9 FFCB 0.88 5/13/2026 170,000 170,291 100.17 170,006 100.00 0.82 169,000 99.41 5.79 (1,006) 2 91282CCF6 T 0.75 5/31/2026 250,000 250,596 100.24 250,020 100.01 0.70 248,113 99.25 5.28 (1,907) 3 02007GSU8 ALLY BK SANDY UTAH CD 3.00 6/9/2026 246,000 246,000 100.00 246,000 100.00 3.00 245,282 99.71 4.49 (718) 4 90348JN48 UBS BK USA SALT LAKECITY UT CD 0.75 6/23/2026 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 0.75 246,005 98.80 6.09 (2,995) 5 649447UZ0 FLAGSTAR BANK NATIONAL A 0.70 7/1/2026 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 0.70 245,820 98.72 5.79 (3,180) 6 25460FDV5 DIRECT FED CR UN NEEDHAM MA 4.75 11/9/2026 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.75 250,877 100.75 3.50 1,877 7 07181JAV6 BAXTER CR UN VERNON HILLS ILL 5.00 11/30/2026 248,000 248,000 100.00 248,000 100.00 5.00 250,262 100.91 3.60 2,262 8 87164WH84 SYNCHRONY BANK CD 1.25 12/10/2026 248,000 248,000 100.00 248,000 100.00 1.25 242,809 97.91 4.33 (5,191) 9 052392CH8 AUSTIN TELCO FED CR UN TEX 4.95 12/16/2026 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.95 251,550 101.02 3.48 2,550 # 3133ENKG4 FFCB 1.47 1/11/2027 530,000 524,988 99.05 529,180 99.85 1.67 519,538 98.03 4.07 (9,642) # 3133ENKG4 FFCB 1.47 1/11/2027 97,000 96,081 99.05 96,850 99.85 1.67 95,085 98.03 4.07 (1,765) # 15118RE78 CELTIC BK SALT LAKE CITY UTAH 4.70 3/17/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.70 251,577 101.04 3.60 2,577 # 32116QBK1 FIRST NATL BK MIDDLETENN CD 4.45 5/19/2027 244,000 244,000 100.00 244,000 100.00 4.45 246,067 100.85 3.68 2,067 # 254673G34 CAPITAL ONE NATL ASSN VA CD 3.15 6/7/2027 246,000 246,000 100.00 246,000 100.00 3.15 243,956 99.17 3.87 (2,044) # 58404DSN2 MEDALLION BK UTAH CD 4.50 6/16/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.50 251,418 100.97 3.67 2,418 # 438649AJ4 HONOLULU FIRE DEPT FED CR UN 4.65 6/22/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.65 251,953 101.19 3.66 2,953 # 02589ADB5 AMERICAN EXPRESS NATL BK BR 3.25 7/13/2027 246,000 246,000 100.00 246,000 100.00 3.25 244,167 99.26 3.84 (1,833) # 90352RCU7 USALLIANCE FCU RYE NEW YORK 4.00 9/30/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.00 249,844 100.34 3.77 844 # 31422XH70 FAMCA 3.79 10/4/2027 334,000 325,656 97.50 330,578 98.98 4.50 334,784 100.23 3.63 4,206 # 914098DJ4 UNIVERSITY BK ANN ARBOR MICH 4.20 11/30/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.20 250,770 100.71 3.76 1,770 # 01664MAB2 ALL IN FED CR UN DALEVILLE 4.40 12/20/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.40 251,722 101.09 3.74 2,722 # 51828MAC8 LATINO CMNTY CR UN DURHAM NOR4.50 12/21/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.50 251,971 101.19 3.78 2,971 # 45157PAZ3 IDEAL CR UN WOODBURYMN 4.50 12/29/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.50 252,018 101.21 3.78 3,018 # 01882MAA0 ALLIANT CR UN CHICAGO IL 4.85 12/30/2027 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.85 253,497 101.81 3.78 4,497 # 82671DAB3 SIGNATURE FED CR UN ALEXANDRIA4.40 1/31/2028 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.40 251,624 101.05 3.80 2,624 # 61690U3L2 MORGAN STANLEY BK N A CD 4.90 3/23/2028 244,000 244,000 100.00 244,000 100.00 4.90 249,439 102.23 3.72 5,439 Agency Distribution Callable Breakdown Portfolio Composition * Amortization/Accretion Book Calculations
93.4%
6.6%
FFCB Other
49.4%
2.2%
48.4%
Agencies Treasuries Certificates of Deposit
7.1%
92.9%
Callable Non-Callable
78.7%
As percent of
Callables
5.6%
As percent of
Portfolio
8 Report Date: 3/31/2026
PGCC 5-20-26
City Of Pacific Grove
Amortization/Accretion Book Calculations
# 91527PBW6 UNIVEST NATL BK TR SOUDERTON 4.10 5/5/2028 249,000 249,000 100.00 249,000 100.00 4.10 250,594 100.64 3.78 1,594 # 3130AXEL8 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK M1-20284.75 9/8/2028 250,000 249,783 99.91 249,885 99.95 4.77 257,715 103.09 3.42 7,830 # 3133EPF91 FFCB 4.50 11/27/2028 500,000 502,222 100.44 501,214 100.24 4.40 510,275 102.06 3.68 9,061 # 3130AYJ31 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK TU-20294.38 1/17/2029 250,000 251,500 100.60 250,863 100.35 4.24 250,273 100.11 4.33 (591) # 3133EPW84 FFCB 3.88 1/18/2029 750,000 748,500 99.80 749,091 99.88 3.92 754,485 100.60 3.65 5,394 # 3133ERQD6 FFCB 3.63 2/20/2029 500,000 500,309 100.06 500,189 100.04 3.61 499,485 99.90 3.66 (704) # 3133EP5J0 FFCB 4.13 3/12/2029 500,000 497,883 99.58 498,686 99.74 4.22 506,115 101.22 3.68 7,429 # 3133EPXV2 FFCB 4.63 4/5/2029 180,000 179,759 99.87 179,849 99.92 4.66 184,669 102.59 3.71 4,820 # 3133EPXV2 FFCB 4.63 4/5/2029 500,000 499,400 99.88 499,624 99.92 4.65 512,970 102.59 3.71 13,346 # 3133ERKX8 FFCB 4.25 7/12/2029 1,000,000 1,007,345 100.73 1,004,965 100.50 4.09 1,017,550 101.76 3.68 12,585 TOTAL and AVERAGES 11,268,000 11,261,311 11,268,001 3.77 11,343,278 3.92 75,277 9 Report Date: 3/31/2026
PGCC 5-20-26
Agenda No. 9 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Casey J. Day, Chief of Police
MEETING DATE: May 20, 2026
SUBJECT: 2026 9-1-1 Service Agreement with the County of Monterey CEQA: {CEQA}
RECOMMENDATION
1. Accept and file the report; and
2. Direct the City Manager to execute the Agreement for 911 Emergency Communications Services.
DISCUSSION
BACKGROUND
The current 911 services agreement between the City of Pacific Grove and other allied agencies & fire district within the County of Monterey was executed in 2020. The 911 Services Agreement is the contract between the County and the user agencies which provides the governance and financing terms of the dispatch and call taking services provided by the Monterey County Emergency Communications Department (ECD).
The ECD Executive Board has completed a current revision of the agreement which has been vetted through the various contract agencies and County of Monterey legal counsel. This action was confirmed in their meeting on February 18th 2026. Revisions to the Agreement were focused on nine different areas which are listed below and further detailed in the attached summary of changes document.
1. Executive Board Composition and Voting.
a. The Board must meet four times per year.
b. Alternates for Board members were added.
c. Approval of routine actions requires only a majority vote. d. Quorum criteria require at least four members representing 50% of dispatch funding.
2. Operations Board Clarification
a. Composition reduced to eight members.
b. The Operations Board must meet once per year.
c. Quorum is five members with a required member from the City of Salinas.
3. Clarified relationship between ECD and Next Generation Radio (NGEN). a. Aligns the 911 Services Agreement with the NGEN Services and Governance Agreement. b. Removes ambiguity on who provides radio support.
4. Defines ECD’s Scope of Services regarding Ambulance Dispatch.
5. Cost-Sharing Plan Modification
a. Clarifies billing language.
PGCC 5-20-26
a. Clarifies billing language.
6. Emergency Notification System Billing
a. The Alert and Warning MOU will be administered by the County Department of Emergency Management.
7. Updates the process for complaint handling and reporting.
8. Aligns with current ECD operations and technological advancements.
9. Grammatical/Style Adjustments
a. Modifications to fit County of Monterey legal and policy styles.
The final steps in the approval process are for each contracting agency to present the revised agreement to their governing Boards or City Councils for approval.
DISCUSSION:
At the August 2025 Executive Board meeting, ECD notified the Executive Board that the new 911 Services Agreement was in the process of being drafted and that the draft would be distributed to the Executive Board for review. The draft was distributed on October 15, 2025 incorporating updates from the 2020 edition which were approved by the Board. Changes were incorporated into the current and revised contract.
OPTIONS
N/A
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The billing estimates received from the County of Monterey for FY26-27 Emergency Communications Services, totals $562,909, and will be reflected in the FY26-27 budget update, as this is approximately $17k more than originally budgeted for within the current two-year approved budget.
FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.
Attachments
SummaryofChanges
BoardAction
911Agreement
PGCC 5-20-26
December 11, 2025 ECD Executive Board
Attachment 2
1 of 4 25-007
2026 9-1-1 Services Agreement Review/
Recommendation for Signature
Action Item – ECD Executive Board 25-007
Date: 12/11/2025
Presented by: ECD Staff
Request:
1: Approve the 2026 Agreement for 9-1-1 Emergency Communications Services and Governance (9-1-1 Services Agreement) for release to Parties for signature; 2: Recommend to all Parties that they sign the 2026 9-1-1 Services Agreement as presented; and 3: Direct the Emergency Communications Department to distribute the 2026 9-1-1 Services Agreement to all Parties for signature with a target effective date of July 1, 2026.
Summary/Discussion
At the August Executive Board ECD notified the Executive Board that a new 9-1-1 Services Agreement was in progress and the draft would be distributed to the Executive Board for them to review and pass along to the Parties they represent for review. This draft was distributed on October 15, 2025 with tracked changes showing updates from the current 9-1-1 Services Agreement. Feedback was due November 25 and changes were incorporated into the current draft. Below is a high-level summary of changes from the current active agreement from 2020.
Before release for signature, County will finalize spacing/formatting after agreement is accepted in final form.
SUMMARY OF CHANGES DISTRIBUTED IN OCTOBER 15, 2025 DRAFT
1. Governance Structure Updates
A. Executive Board Composition and Voting
2020 Agreement
• No alternates permitted for Executive Board voting members. • All recommendations required unanimous vote of the quorum. • Quorum required representation of greater than 50 percent of dispatch funding. • Must meet once per quarter.
2025 Revision
• Must meet at least four times per year.
• Alternates formally added for Executive Board voting seats, designated through an agendized notice.
PGCC 5-20-26
December 11, 2025 ECD Executive Board
Attachment 2
2 of 4 25-007
• Approval of routine actions now requires a majority vote of the quorum, not unanimity.
• Unanimous vote still required for:
o Amendments to the Agreement
o Amendments to bylaws
o Adding or removing Participating Parties
• Quorum requirements clarified:
o Must include at least four members representing at least 50 percent of dispatch funding.
2. Operations Board Clarifications
A. Membership Adjustments
2020 Agreement
• Ten members, including three law, three fire, Sheriff, Salinas Police, Salinas Fire, and ECD Director.
2025 Revision
• Reduced to eight members, representing:
o Two law
o Two fire
o Sheriff
o Salinas Police Chief
o Salinas Fire Chief
o ECD Director
• Formalized quorum definition: 5 members, with representation requirements. • Salinas must be present.
• Must meet at least once per year.
3. Clarified Relationship Between ECD and NGEN
2020 Agreement
• NGEN referenced only as “other governing agreements.” 2025 Revision
• Explicitly aligns the 9-1-1 Services Agreement with the NGEN Services and Governance Agreement, clarifying that:
o ITD manages radio infrastructure under the NGEN agreement.
PGCC 5-20-26
December 11, 2025 ECD Executive Board
Attachment 2
3 of 4 25-007
o ECD manages call taking and dispatch operations.
• Removes ambiguity on who provides radio support.
4. Clearer Definition of ECD’s Scope of Services
A. Ambulance Dispatch Clarification
2020 Agreement
• EMS Agency referenced but ambulance dispatch responsibilities were not clearly separated.
2025 Revision
• Explicit statement that ECD does not dispatch ambulances, except where local arrangements exist.
• Defines ECD’s role as initial call-taking and transfer to the EMS provider.
5. Cost-Sharing Plan Modernization
A. Standard Cost Sharing
2020 Agreement
• Cost formula based on actual costs minus revenue offsets, weighted 3-factor formula, Prop 172 offset, etc.
2025 Revision
• Clarifies billing language:
o Explicit recognition of admin fees tied to non-dispatch services (NGEN, ENS).
o Clarifies that Inform Mobile Licensing is billed under this agreement. o Introduces 2026 policy change:
▪ Fire-only agencies that transition later lose the 10 percent multiplier privilege.
▪ New agencies joining must be “fire only” service for the Party to qualify for 10% multiplier subsidy.
6. Emergency Notification System Billing
2020 Agreement
• ENS billing referenced as a possible charge.
2025 Revision
• Billing authority remains, but will move to new Alert & Warning MOU administered by DEM and be removed from 9-1-1 Services Agreement as soon as MOU is complete.
7. Complaint Handling and Reporting Changes
PGCC 5-20-26
December 11, 2025 ECD Executive Board
Attachment 2
4 of 4 25-007
2020 Agreement
• Required Director to routinely report summary of complaints to EC Boards. 2025 Revision
• Updates process:
o Complaints handled as a core operational responsibility. o Reporting to EC Boards occurs only upon request.
o Users directly involved in complaints receive updates automatically.
8. Alignment with Current ECD Operations and Technology The 2025 revision adds significant clean-up:
• Updated definitions for:
o EMS Provider
o MDCS responsibilities
o ITD’s role in cybersecurity and infrastructure
o Vendor agreements and third-party support
• Removes outdated language tied to pre-2020 systems.
9. Grammatical/Style Adjustments
• Standardization of Terminology
• Removal of Redundant or Conflicting Language
• Punctuation and Grammar Corrections
• Clarification of Definitions and Cross-References
• Alignment with County Legal and Policy Style
_______________________________Executive Board Action _________________________________ Modification to requested action: Yes ___ No ___
Vote Date __/__/__
Motion by ___________ 2
nd
____________ Approved:
/s/ Chair _____________________________
Yeas: Nays:
PGCC 5-20-26
PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
AGREEMENT
FOR 9-1-1 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES AND
GOVERNANCE
This agreement is made and entered into as of the date of last signature, by and between the County of Monterey, a political subdivision of the State of California (“County”), and the Cities, Fire Districts and other organizations listed below (County and these entities may be referred to collectively as the “Parties”):
Fire Police
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea X
City of Del Rey Oaks X
City of Gonzales X X
City of Greenfield X X
City of King X X
City of Marina X X
City of Monterey X X
City of Pacific Grove X X
City of Salinas X X
City of Sand City X
City of Seaside X X
City of Soledad X X
Monterey County Regional Fire
Protection District
X
North County Fire Protection District of
Monterey County
X
Big Sur Volunteer Fire Brigade X
Mid Coast Fire Brigade X
Miscellaneous Agencies
California State University, Monterey Bay X
Monterey Peninsula Airport District X X
Correctional Training/ Salinas Valley
State Prison
X
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to participate in a countywide public safety communicationsand emergency 9-1-1 dispatch system (System) consisting of all necessary 9-1-1 call taking, logging, dispatching, communications and other related services and technology for law enforcement, fire, emergency medical and other services; WHEREAS, the Parties desire to collaborate as partners to better serve the public with the understanding that a formal structure will enable the County to work with representatives of the Parties and users of the System to achieve clear policy direction and consistent coordination regarding emergency dispatch services;
PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
WHEREAS, the County, through its Department of Emergency Communications and under the governance of the Board of Supervisors, is willing and able to furnish such services through a mutually agreeable cost sharing plan;
WHEREAS, the Parties agree to utilize mutually owned and/or licensed equipment and resources including, but not limited to: facilities for housing staff or equipment, telephone system(s), a computer aided dispatch system and other shared infrastructure that exists today and may be installed in the future;
WHEREAS, the County of Monterey and participating jurisdictions have entered into a separate Services and Governance Agreement to support the Next Generation Radio System (NGEN), which provides for the shared operation, maintenance, and management of critical public safety radio infrastructure in alignment with, but independent from, this 9-1-1 Services Agreement;
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to work in partnership to provide input, direction and advisory decision-making on items such as operations, budget, strategy, and vision as they pertain to the County’s provision of emergency call taking, non-emergency call taking, fire, law enforcement and medical dispatching and associated emergency communications services; and
WHEREAS, the County has previously provided these services pursuant to a written agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. DEFINITIONS
A Assets: Real estate, structures, equipment, and intellectual property dedicated to, used by, or generated for use in the 9-1-1 communications system and associated emergency services. “County Assets” include property purchased or otherwise acquired by the County, without financial contributions from other member Agencies. “System Assets” include property purchased or otherwise acquired by the Parties in common. Those Parties that did not contribute to the purchase, acquisition, or generation of an asset do not hold ownership rights in that asset.
B County: The County has several roles as administrator of the System, provider of services, and as a recipient of services. A “County Service Department” refers to a department of the County that directly bills Emergency Communications for services.
C County Board of Supervisors: The Board of Supervisors for the County of Monterey, pursuant to Government Code section 25000, is the governing body for the County of Monterey. It has final authority regarding all aspects PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
of the 9-1-1 system, including budget, for delivery of emergency communications services.
D County-wide Cost Allocation Plan: The County-wide Cost Allocation Plan is the mechanism used by the County to bill overhead charges to County departments.
E Director: The Director of the County of Monterey Emergency Communications Department, a County employee, as further described herein.
F Emergency Communications Department (ECD): The County department responsible for providing emergency and non-emergency public safety communications services to participating jurisdictions under this Agreement.
ECD’s responsibilities include 9-1-1 call-taking, non-emergency call handling and dispatch operations for law enforcement and fire services. ECD also provides initial call triage for medical emergencies before transferring to the designated EMS provider.
G Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Agency: the Local Emergency Medical Services Agency (LEMSA) designated by the County pursuant to the California Emergency Medical Services System and the Prehospital Emergency Medical Care Personnel Act. The EMS Agency is responsible for medical control, regulatory oversight, system design and provider authorization for emergency medical services within the County.
H EMS Provider: the contract ambulance service provider authorized by the EMS Agency and selected by a Participating Jurisdiction to deliver emergency and/or non-emergency medical transportation services. The EMS Provider is responsible for field response and coordination in accordance with EMS Agency protocols and the terms of its service agreement.
I Executive Board: The Executive Board is comprised of certain executives of the Parties and represents the Parties as specified in this agreement.
J Fiscal Year: A “Fiscal Year” is defined as July 1 of each year to June 30 of the following year.
K Emergency Communications Boards (EC Boards): The Emergency Communications Boards are the Executive Board and the Operations Board whose responsibilities are specified in this agreement.
L Information Technology Department (ITD): The County department responsible for providing and maintaining countywide information technology infrastructure and services, including network connectivity, cybersecurity, County-wide enterprise systems, and County-managed computer hardware PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
used by the Emergency Communications Department (ECD). ITD also operates and maintains the Next Generation Radio System (NGEN) pursuant to the separate Agreement for NGEN Services and Governance.
M Operations Board: The Operations Board is comprised of certain representatives of the law enforcement and fire protection agencies that are Users, as defined below, directly receiving services as specified in this agreement.
N Parties: The County and the Cities, Fire Districts, and other organizations that are signatory to this agreement.
O User: Any entity directly receiving emergency communications services from the County through ECD, including County Departments, such as but not limited to, the County of Monterey Sheriff and the EMS provider utilized by the County of Monterey, and including the public safety departments and subentities of the Parties to this agreement. The Parties understand and agree that each Party may have one or more Users of ECD services pursuant to this agreement.
P Miscellaneous Agencies: Non-Voting Agencies that do not have all three billable factors of "population, assessed property value, workload" necessary to be charged with the Standard Cost Sharing model such as Municipal, State and Federal entities that contract for services with the County of Monterey for Emergency Communications, e.g. State College and Correctional Facilities.
2. DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS
A The Director is a County of Monterey department head position.
B The duties of the Director are to plan, organize, coordinate, administer, and direct all activities of the Emergency Communications Department.
C The Director shall be selected by the County Administrative Officer (CAO).
1. In the selection of the Director, the CAO shall seek concurrence from the Executive Board, but the CAO shall retain authority to select, hire, evaluate, discipline and release the Director.
2. In reviewing the performance of the Director, the CAO shall consult with the Executive Board and shall receive a written statement from the Executive Board regarding the Director’s performance in meeting the standard herein, which will become part of the overall review. Still, all personnel evaluation decisions regarding the Director shall be the sole purview of the CAO.
D The Director will consult with the EC Boards in matters related to ECD operational priorities, financial and budgetary requirements, policies and problem-solving. ECD operational decisions shall be the sole purview of the PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
County, acting through the Director.
E The Director, at the request of the Executive Board, will seek accreditation from an appropriate accreditation group.
3. EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS BOARDS (EC Boards)
A The Parties agree to the formation of the EC Boards to consult and advise on the emergency communications and dispatch services provided by the ECD.
Responsibilities of the EC Boards are defined herein. For those items where the EC Boards do not have direct responsibility, such as, but not limited to, labor relations, the County shall coordinate and collaborate in good faith with the Parties through the EC Boards. The governance structure established by any other agreement affecting the delivery of 9-1-1 emergency communications is revoked to the extent that it conflicts with the governance structure established by this agreement.
B The EC Boards shall work in conjunction with the Director in developing a strategic plan for the delivery of emergency communications services.
4. EXECUTIVE BOARD
A Voting members: Comprised of four City Managers---one city manager representing Salinas, one city manager representing the South County Cities of Gonzales, Greenfield, Soledad, and King City, one city manager representing the North Peninsula Cities of Marina, Seaside, and Sand City, and one city manager representing the South Peninsula Cities of Carmel-by-the Sea, Monterey, Del Rey Oaks, and Pacific Grove; plus one representative of the Fire Districts, one representative of the County of Monterey Sheriff, and the CAO, for a total of seven (7) voting Executive Board members. Each of these positions shall also have an Alternate who may act as a full Board Member in the absence of the Board Member. The Alternate must be set in advance through an agendized notification to the ECD Executive Board. The three City Managers representing the South County Cities, North Peninsula Cities, and the South Peninsula Cities will be selected by members of the Monterey Bay Area Manager’s Group. The Fire District Representative will be selected by the Monterey County Fire District's and Volunteer Fire Company Association. The Alternates will be selected by the same groups with the City of Salinas and the County of Monterey Sheriff selecting their own Alternates.
B Each Voting Member will have one equally weighted vote. Voting Members must be Present for their vote to count. To be considered Present a Voting Member must attend in person or through Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code section 54950-54963 (Brown Act) compliant remote attendance for their vote to count. The weight of each vote shall be dependent upon how many voting members are present with the total weight always equaling 100% and a quorum PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
must be present for voting to occur.
C A quorum for conducting business shall consist of at least four Executive Board members representing at least 50% of the total dispatch center funding as defined by the current cost-sharing formulas.
D Approval of actions by the Executive Board shall require a majority vote of the Executive Board members present at a meeting where quorum is established.
E All operational and financial decisions within the scope of the approved budget shall remain under the exclusive authority of the Director of the ECD.
F A unanimous vote of the quorum shall be required to: Amend this Agreement, create or amend the bylaws, or admit or remove a Participating Party.
1. All recommendations and other actions taken by the Executive Board pursuant to this agreement require a vote of a quorum at a duly noticed and conducted meeting, that includes the following non- voting advisors:
1 County of Monterey ECD Director or their designee
2. The following non-voting advisors of the Executive Board are NOT required to be present at a meeting for a vote on any recommendation or action are:
1 County of Monterey EMS Bureau Chief
2 Chief Information Officer for the County of Monterey
3 Operations Board Chairperson or Vice Chair
3. The presence or absence of an advisor at a meeting of the Executive Board shall not count towards establishing a quorum.
G The Executive Board shall meet at least four times per Fiscal Year and shall give reasonable notice of all meetings to all Users and all Parties. Meetings of the Executive Board shall be conducted in compliance with the requirements of the Brown Act.
H Executive Board meeting agendas will be physically posted and electronically posted on the ECD web site in accordance with Brown Act requirements.
I The Executive Board shall elect a chair and such other officers as it sees fit.The Executive Board may establish procedures for its business and operations, create committees composed of the Party representatives or other persons, and perform such other acts that do not violate the terms of this agreement, the bylaws adopted by the Executive Board or applicable law.
PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
J Tenure: In the event of removal, resignation, or death of a voting member of the Executive Board, the entity responsible for appointment of that member shall promptly appoint a successor to fill the position.
K Executive Board Duties
1. The Parties understand and agree that the Executive Board has the responsibility, under this agreement, to make recommendations that affect the costs, nature and scope of the emergency communications services provided to their organizations; recommendations regarding the costs, nature, and scope of the emergency communications services provided to the Parties under this agreement shall be made at Executive Board meetings at which a quorum of voting members is present; all recommendations made by the Executive Board shall be enacted by a vote of the quorum following voting rules set forth in this agreement.
2. From time to time, ECD’s budget may be augmented pursuant to this Agreement to provide special funding as needed for reasons such as, but not limited to, purchase of special or upgraded equipment, replacement of failed equipment, purchase of emergency communications system software and hardware; the Executive Board shall recommend equitable apportionment of such special costs among the Parties, as otherwise provided in this agreement.
3. The Executive Board may recommend that the County, acting through the Board of Supervisors, enter into binding service agreements on behalf of all Parties or it may recommend that a service be referred to the affected Users’ governing bodies for approval before a service is implemented.
4. The Executive Board may make recommendations to the County, through ECD, regarding emergency communications services program and budget-related issues. Executive Board members shall be responsible for providing information on emergency communications services program and budget issues to the Users that they represent.
Users shall present such information to their governing bodies, as they deem appropriate.
5. The Executive Board shall have the responsibility to propose to the Parties fiscal policies that affect the Parties and Users.
6. The Executive Board shall meet at least four times per fiscal year, provided a quorum can be present, to receive reports from the Director or designee on all policy matters pertaining to budget, personnel, equipment, operations, or fiscal issues which could affect costs to Users. The Executive Board may review items presented by PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
the County, items initiated by members of the Executive Board and items initiated by Parties and Users.
7. Notwithstanding the duties of the Executive Board to recommend policies regarding emergency communications services, where services provided or administered by ECD are not used by all the Parties, the representatives of those Parties using the respective services shall have primary responsibility for recommending policies with respect to those services; these policies shall not conflict with the County’s policies or other ECD departmental policies. Any costs of special services shall be the responsibility of the using Party(s). The County will determine policy on unique services used by specified Parties, taking into account their recommendations, made pursuant to this provision.
8. The Executive Board may appoint Standing and Ad Hoc Committee(s) as necessary to advise it on technical matters or to consider special issues.
9. The Executive Board shall provide policy recommendations and input to the ECD Director. Operational decisions on the delivery of 9-1-1 services shall be the sole purview of the County, acting through the Director as provided in Section 2, subsection D of this Agreement.
10. The Executive Board may request financial or performance audit(s) of the ECD, including that the auditor be independent from the County. The costs of an independent financial audit shall be borne, proportionally, by the Parties as specified in this agreement. Upon the Executive Board’s request for an audit, the Emergency Communications Department will cooperate in such audits.
11. Bylaws. The Executive Board may adopt bylaws consistent with this agreement, which may be amended from time to time. These by-laws shall serve as the guiding governance document for the Executive Board in performing its duties under this agreement. In the event of a conflict between the Executive Board’s Bylaws and this agreement, this agreement shall prevail.
1 The Executive Board shall provide 30-day advance notice to the Parties of any scheduled Executive Board meeting at which it will consider a proposal to amend the by-laws.
2 Amendments to the bylaws must be approved by a vote of the Executive Board per the voting requirements in Section 4 of this Agreement.
PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
5. OPERATIONS BOARD
A Membership of the Operations Board consists of executives, or their designees, from two law enforcement agencies, two fire protection agencies, and the County of Monterey Sheriff, City of Salinas Police Chief, City of Salinas Fire Chief, and the Director of the County’s ECD, for a total of eight members.
B Representatives of the law enforcement agencies and the fire protection agencies will be selected by their respective Chiefs associations.
C The Parties agree that attendance and full participation by all Operations Board members are crucial. A quorum shall be defined as five voting members. It must include at least one representative from the City of Salinas and at least one law and one fire representative from any agency (the City of Salinas representative may count). Designees shall count towards quorum and must verbally identify themselves during roll-call. A quorum shall be established for each meeting of the Operations Board. After three unexcused absences by any one member of the Operations Board, the entity or entities represented by that member shall appoint a different individual to serve as a member of the Operations Board.
D Each member has one vote; there shall be no weighted voting.
E The affirmative vote by a majority of a quorum of the voting members present at an Operations Board meeting is required for the Operations Board to take action.
F Key responsibilities of the Operations Board include:
1. Creating and tasking internal User Groups to resolve issues, develop protocols; investigate technologies, and address other operational issues associated with emergency communications and dispatch services.
These User Groups may include:
1 Dedicated Fire Dispatch (DFD) subcommittee of the Monterey County Fire Chiefs Association
2 The Monterey County Law Enforcement Agency Association (MCLEAA) subcommittee of the Monterey County Chief Law
Enforcement Officers Association.
3 Other User Groups as needed.
2. Providing recommendations to the Executive Board on operational policies, goals, and operational enhancements, including those that have budgetary implications.
G Meets at least once annually and as needed to provide input and make recommendations on operational issues that impact multiple Parties. Duties
1. The Operations Board may provide operational policy recommendations.
PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
2. The Operations Board shall have responsibility to provide recommendations regarding matters pertaining to operating policies that affect multiple Parties.
3. The Operations Board may receive reports from the Director or designee on major operational issues that impact multiple Parties.
4. The Operations Board may review items presented by the County, initiated by members of the Operations Board, and initiated by Users and Parties.
5. Where services are provided or administered by ECD, and are not used by all the Parties, the representatives of those Parties using the respective services shall have primary responsibility for recommending operational policies with respect to those services; these policies shall not conflict with County-wide policies or with ECD departmental policies.
Any costs of special services shall be the responsibility of the using Party(s). County will determine policy on unique services used by specified Parties, taking into account their recommendations, made pursuant to this provision.
6. The Operations Board may appoint Standing and Ad Hoc Committee(s) as necessary to advise it on technical matters or to consider special issues.
7. In advance of addition of new technology or services that increase costs to User Agencies, the Operations Board shall identify and recommend cost sharing and funding mechanisms. This shall include technology and services that are funded by grants but that may have future additional costs such as for maintenance.
8. The Operations Board will recommend to the Executive Board, as it sees fit, programmatic performance audits and reviews of the Emergency Communications Department.
9. Bylaws. The Operations Board may adopt bylaws consistent with this agreement, which may be amended from time to time. These by-laws shall be the guiding governance document for the Operations Board in performing its duties under this agreement. In the event of a conflict between the By-Laws and this agreement, this agreement shall prevail. 1 The Operations Board shall provide 30-days advance notice to the Parties of any scheduled Operations Board meeting at which it will consider a proposal to amend the by-laws.
2 Amendments to Operations Board bylaws must be approved by all members of the Operations Board.
PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
6. COUNTY OBLIGATIONS
A The County shall provide 9-1-1 call-taking and dispatch services through ECD, excluding radio infrastructure support and maintenance. The County, through the IT Department, provides radio services through the Agreement for NGEN Services and Governance.
B The County shall provide all answering services for calls made to Users’ nonemergency telephone number (one number per User).
C The County shall dispatch User law enforcement, fire, and in jurisdictions where specific local arrangements apply emergency medical field units and shall provide associated services, including status reporting and activity reports.
D The County, through its Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Agency, contracts separately for ambulance dispatch and transport under the Ambulance Services Agreement. The Emergency Communications Department (ECD) does not dispatch ambulance units under this 9-1-1 Services Agreement, except in jurisdictions where specific local arrangements apply. ECD’s role is limited to initial call-taking, defined as the receipt and processing of telephone calls, including the entry of basic location and incident information into the computer-aided dispatch (CAD) system, followed by the transfer of the call to the designated ambulance dispatch provider. Responsibility for ambulance unit deployment and oversight remains solely with the EMS Agency and the contracted provider under the Ambulance Services Agreement.
E The County shall, upon agreement with the individual Parties, provide responses to urgent or emergency data inquiries made by Users’ field units.
F At the request of a User agency, the County may provide additional public safety call-taking or dispatch-related services beyond the scope of this Agreement. Such services shall be considered upon recommendation by the Operations and Executive Boards and are subject to final approval by the Director of Emergency Communications. All costs for additional services shall be the responsibility of the requesting agency and shall be memorialized in a separate written agreement.
G The County shall provide and maintain all necessary consoles, and telephone systems, located in its communications center(s).
H The County shall operate and maintain the telecommunications systems and associated infrastructure necessary to support the Emergency Communications Department’s 9-1-1 call-taking and dispatch functions.
Equipment and transmission systems that are exclusively used by an individual User agency—such as mobile, portable, base station, or remote radio and data terminals—shall be the sole responsibility of that User agency and PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
maintained at that agency’s expense. This section does not apply to infrastructure or services governed under the Agreement for NGEN Services and Governance.
I County shall coordinate, administer, and maintain all systems defined by the EC Boards to benefit all Parties and Users, including development of standard operating procedures that may include training of Parties’ and Users’ staff to meet their responsibilities. All systems shall be maintained and operated consistent with applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules and regulations such as the State of California Department of Justice and Federal Communications Commission.
J The County, on behalf of all Parties, may pursue grant opportunities and other external funding sources as appropriate. Applications shall be made with authorization from the County Board of Supervisors. Any funds awarded shall be applied to proportionately offset the Parties’ share of applicable project expenses.
K County shall provide technical expertise in emergency communications and dispatch services and as well as associated administrative services such as, but not limited to, human resources, budgeting, auditor, treasurer, and technical support.
L The County shall notify the Executive Board of finalized decisions that may materially affect the cost or delivery of emergency communications services under this Agreement, including implemented salary or benefit adjustments, layoffs, or scheduling impacts such as winter recess. The County shall not disclose pending labor negotiations or confidential matters related to collective bargaining. However, the County will consider feedback from the EC Boards on the operational impacts of such decisions once formally adopted.
M With the approval of the County Board of Supervisors, County shall be the signatory on agreements with third-party vendors for services such as, but not limited to, support of systems required under this agreement.
N The County shall provide appropriate management, supervision, and administrative support for all emergency communications and dispatch services delivered through this Agreement. The EC Boards may make recommendations regarding service enhancements or alternative approaches to support operational efficiency. The County shall consider such recommendations in good faith, consistent with applicable laws, fiscal constraints, and operational requirements.
O The County shall bill to Users all costs associated with providing 9-1-1 emergency call taking, non-emergency call-taking, law enforcement dispatch, fire dispatch, emergency medical dispatch, and other emergency PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
communications or associated services in accordance with Section 13 ofthis agreement.
P The County will support, participate in, and cooperate with financial and programmatic audits and reviews of the Emergency Communications Department as recommended by the Executive and Operations Boards.
Q For direct and indirect costs that County will bill to Users as part of this agreement, County shall provide invoices or other available supporting documents in a timely manner and in accordance with Section 13 ofthis agreement.
R County-requested projects requiring contribution from the Parties shall be submitted by the County, through the Director, to the Executive Board, in advance of incurring costs. The Executive Board shall make recommendations to the County on the projects and costs.
7. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE USERS AND PARTIES
A Each Party, through its representative on the EC Boards, shall support the effective management and operation of the emergency communications system by providing technical and operational input to inform system design, functionality, and usage. Such input will help ensure the system meets both individual and collective public safety needs, while operational authority remains with the County.
B Each Party shall be responsible for communicating with its constituents and governing bodies about the emergency communications systems.
C Each Party shall, at its own cost, be responsible for the procurement, maintenance, and replacement of its assets that are not System Assets Such assets must be (1) compatible with the systems used by County of Monterey Emergency Communications Department, (2) serve an individual User, and (3) used by that User’s personnel at that Party’s expense. Each Party shall pay all costs associated with those assets.
D Each Party utilizing Mobile Data Communications System (MDCS) services shall, at its own expense, be responsible for the procurement, maintenance, and use of equipment that is compatible with the County’s technology infrastructure in effect at that time and coordinate directly with the County’s Information Technology Department (ITD), and any associated costs shall be borne by the Party. These services and expenses are separate from the emergency communications services and budget administered by ECD.
E The Executive Board, with input from the Operations Board, may recommend to the County cost-sharing formulas on behalf of all Users for additional future emergency communications services provided by the County under PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
this Agreement. This excludes services governed by separate agreements.
F All Parties shall provide information requested by the County or the EC Boards such as device inventory, in a timely manner.
G Each Party shall comply with future requirements as recommended by the EC Boards. This may include but is not limited to required operational agreements, training, or upgrades of systems to comply with state or federal requirements.
H Where applicable and feasible, and at the request of the Executive Board, all Parties shall cooperate in supporting the acquisition of external funding such as grants or earmarks. Parties are not obligated to seek or administer grants independently but may assist when opportunities align with mutual goals or operational needs. If any portion of the emergency communications system is funded through grants, contracts, or earmarks secured by any Party, all Parties shall comply with applicable provisions of such agreements to the extent required. Upon request, the Party awarded the funding shall provide a copy of the relevant documentation to any requesting Party at no cost.
8. TERM AND RENEWAL OF THE AGREEMENT
A The Effective Date of this agreement shall be the date that all Parties have signed the agreement, with the County signing last. Simultaneous to the effective date of the agreement, the County and the Parties agree that the following agreements are revoked and are no longer in effect:
1. All pre-existing 9-1-1 Services Agreements including by-laws, addressing emergency communications and dispatch services in the County of Monterey.
B The initial term of this agreement shall be for three years plus the remainder of the fiscal year that the agreement is executed, unless terminated sooner by mutual consent of all Parties.
1. Any Party seeking to withdraw may do so starting with the end of year three of the agreement and only after providing a two-year advance notice to the Executive Board and to all other Parties as specified in Section 8, subsection G below.
C Upon completion of the initial three-year term, this agreement shall automatically be renewed for successive periods of two years.
D Any Party seeking to withdraw may do so only after providing a two-year (24 months) advance written notice to (1) the Executive Board and (ii) to all other Parties. Notices of intention to withdraw shall be mailed or delivered to (i) each member of the Executive Board and (ii) to each Party at the address identified on the signature pages of this agreement.
E If a Party withdraws pursuant to this Section, the agreement will remain valid for PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
those Parties that have elected to remain party to this agreement and any costs that are shared among the Parties shall be reallocated to reflect proportionate share for the Parties continuing to participate. All costs for the remainder of the fiscal year that a party withdraws in is the responsibility of the withdrawing party.
F In the event of withdrawal by a Party which is providing resources (such as licenses, site, or other resources) to the benefit of all Users, that resource shall be left intact and in service and that Party shall negotiate in good faith with the County and remaining Parties for continuing use of that resource.
G Voluntary Withdrawal.
1. A withdrawing Party shall provide the EC Boards with written notice of intent to withdraw 24 months before the effective date of withdrawal, a written timetable for withdrawal, and a description of the way the withdrawal will be conducted. The withdrawing Party’s plan for withdrawal shall minimize disruption to other Parties and Users. The withdrawing Party shall provide any other appropriate information requested by the EC Boards or the Director, to allow the development of strategies to mitigate disruption to the remaining Users.
2. Such withdrawing Party shall continue to fund its portion of the Emergency Communications budget pursuant to this agreement for 24 months plus the remainder of the fiscal year in which the withdrawal occurs after issuance of its notice of withdrawal.
3. A withdrawing Party shall agree to a buy-out agreement to retire any financial obligations of the withdrawing Party. The Party will remain responsible for any services that will continue to be provided by the County.
4. Upon withdrawal, the withdrawing Party relinquishes all rights to System Assets.
5. A withdrawing Party that is a member of an EC Board shall notify the applicable appointing authority of its intention to withdraw at the same time that it notifies the other Parties of its withdrawal. If a withdrawing Party holds a seat on an EC Board representing other parties, that Party’s seat shall be reassigned immediately upon receipt of the written notice to withdraw.
6. A Party that has withdrawn from its participation in this Agreement shall not be entitled to refund of any costs that it has incurred for the system through to the date of termination.
H Termination for Cause. The County, in consultation with the Executive Board, may terminate the participation of any Party for cause, including a Party’s failure to fully fund or fully pay budgeted costs, as well as any other breach of PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
this agreement (default). Cause for termination includes compliance with any requirement imposed upon the Parties as specified in this agreement.
1. The Termination for Cause process shall include the following steps:
1 Written notice by the Director of the Emergency Communications Department or designee to the Party, with a copy to Executive Board members. Such notice shall advise the Party of the reason for possible termination. The notice shall further advise that the Party may cure its default within 30 days of the notice and thereby avoid termination.
2 If the defaulting Party begins to cure such default, the 30-day cure period will be extended by additional 30-day extensions, for as long as the defaulting Party continues to diligently prosecute such a cure to completion.
3 If the defaulting Party does not cure the default within 30 days, termination of the defaulting Party shall be placed on the agenda for next Executive Board meeting. The Executive Board shall request in writing that the defaulting Party attend that meeting.
The defaulting Party shall be asked to provide either (1) a plan for curing its default or (2) a plan for withdrawal, as detailed below.
4 If the Executive Board finds the defaulting Party’s plan for curing its default unacceptable, the Executive Board may determine by majority vote to recommend to the County that it terminate the defaulting Party’s participation in this Agreement or to take other appropriate measures (e.g. lien).
5 If the Executive Board decides to recommend termination of the defaulting Party from this Agreement, the Executive Board shall provide written notice to the defaulting Party that it recommends to the County that services provided under this agreement be terminated, effective 24 months following the date of delivery of the notice. A copy of the written notice of recommended termination delivered to a defaulting Party shall be provided to County. The County retains final authority and discretion to terminate a defaulting party and to determine the date that services provided under this agreement will be terminated. 6 A Party terminated by the County for cause remains liable for its portion of emergency communications system costs up to the effective termination date, as well as applicable damages, collection costs, and interest.
PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
7 The Executive Board may recommend to the County allocation of remaining System Assets among the Parties to the County or it may recommend to the County allowing the terminated Party to retain the value of its System Assets, with the stipulation that use of the system will not be made available to that Party, unless and until the Party agrees to cure all defaults/breaches as set out above.
2. The terminated Party forfeits all other rights.
3. Rights of Remaining Parties. Once the un-depreciated value of the system assets used by the defaulting Party is determined, the Executive Board may recommend to the County reallocating the system value and allocating system costs proportionally among the remaining parties. A Party that has been terminated by the County or that has withdrawn from participation shall not be entitled to refund of any costs that it has incurred for the system to the date of termination.
I Dissolution. This agreement may be voluntarily terminated by the agreement of all the Parties. As part of the termination of this agreement and dissolution of the system, the County, upon recommendation of the Executive Board, shall distribute System Assets in proportion to the contribution made by all Parties.
9. SERVICE QUALITY AND CONDITIONS
A The quality of system services to be provided to all Parties and Users shall, in the absence of explicitly adopted exceptions, be equal to or above established industry standards. The adopted standards and best practices shall be based upon those established by APCO, NFPA, NENA, POST, ISO, CalOES 9-1-1 Branch, and others identified by the EC Boards. In those areas where there are no industry standards, or where the established standard is not appropriate for the County of Monterey, the Director shall recommend standards and advise the EC Boards regarding budgetary, service level and other resources required to meet those standards. The EC Boards shall consider those recommendations and agree to appropriate System standards in good faith.
B Emergency Communications systems performance shall be measured in accordance with those standards developed as indicated above. The Director shall report at least annually to Parties and Users through the EC Boards regarding performance. The EC Boards may review the level of performance being achieved for each agency/User and for the whole operation in comparison to the standards and in comparison, to the levels of performance achieved in previous periods.
PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
In reviewing system performance, the EC Boards shall consider staffing, technology, or other limitations impacting the ability to meet standards. The reporting interval may differ for different standards.
C The County, in consultation with the EC Boards, will evaluate the feasibility of accreditation by appropriate accrediting groups, (i.e., CALEA, APCO, etc.), taking into account the investment of County staffing levels and County resources required. Final decision regarding pursuit of accreditation will remain in the sole discretion of the County. The accreditations referred to by this provision of this Agreement do not refer to or include accreditation of the County’s contract ambulance services provider.
D During the budget development process, the Director shall recommend, and the EC Boards shall evaluate, the nature and scope of services to be provided to Users. The Director shall consider requests from Users desiring increased levels of service; such requests may be recommended to the County through the Executive Board.
E Procedures related to dispatch operations will be developed by the Director, with input, as needed, from recognized advisory groups (e.g., Law Chiefs or Fire Chiefs.) Any dispute or conflict regarding a dispatch procedure will first be addressed by the Director to determine if a resolution can be reached. If no resolution can be agreed to by the affected parties, the EC Boards may be consulted, with the final determination of appropriate action to be made by the County, acting through the Director.
F The Director or their designee will promptly investigate all complaints received from any User or member of the public and will respond in a timely manner to the complaining party. The Director shall provide a summary of complaints and their resolution to the EC Boards or individual Users upon request. As Users contract with the County for 9-1-1 services, the handling of complaints is considered a core operational responsibility and will not be subject to routine reporting unless specifically requested. If a User is directly involved in a complaint, the Department will ensure that User is kept informed of any new or relevant information throughout the course of the investigation.
10. ADDITION OF NEW MEMBERS
A Any government organization that is not a party to this agreement on the effective date of this agreement may become a Party upon: (a) the recommendation of the Emergency Communications Department; (b) the recommendation of the Executive Board by majority vote; (c) payment of a pro rata share of all previously incurred costs that the County determines will benefit the requesting organization and are thereby appropriate to assess to the PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
organization; and (d) execution of a written agreement with the County subjecting the requesting organization to the terms and conditions of this agreement. The County may execute an amendment to this agreement to include a new Party.
B The Executive Board may recommend by majority vote, imposing one-time fees upon new Parties to offset costs incurred in previous fiscal years (buy-in fees).
Buy-in fees include but are not limited to facility construction, major equipment purchases, and software. Buy-in fees will be incorporated into the budget for emergency communications services.
C Under special circumstances, such as but not limited to manmade or natural disaster, acts of God, and acts of civil unrest, temporary access to the emergency communications services may be provided to non-Parties. The Director may approve non-party access and notify the EC Boards. Non-Parties may be required by the County to reimburse the County or Parties and Users any costs resulting from temporary emergency access.
11. BUDGET DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
A Program and budget related decisions shall be developed by the County with input from the EC Boards, and ECD staff. The Executive Board will review staff recommendations and provide final recommendations to the County. The County Board of Supervisors shall have final authority over program and budget related decisions.
B The Executive Board shall review the Emergency Communications Department’s annual budget request prior to County’s budget hearings. The County shall provide all relevant information, including information about indirect costs, in a timely manner, allowing sufficient time for the Executive Board to evaluate and make requests for information.
C The Executive Board will advise regarding the Emergency Communications Department budget and service levels to be proposed to the Board of Supervisors and to the Parties’ governing bodies, as applicable, in the form of recommended budgets and augmentation requests, in accordance with procedures established by the County. The Executive Board may provide recommendations to staff working with County service departments in reviewing charges and levels of service provided by the Emergency Communications Department. In the event that the Executive Board does not concur with the County’s Recommended Budget, the Director and the Chair of the Executive Board shall present the Executive Board’s recommendations regarding emergency communications budget and service levels directly to the County Board of Supervisors. Final PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
budget approval regarding budgets and funding of service levels are the responsibility of the County Board of Supervisors.
D The County of Monterey Emergency Communications Department will provide reports on future budgets, current year budget management and cost control, personnel (recruitment, hiring, retention), and special project status on an ongoing and annual basis as requested by the Executive Board.
E County Administrative Office staff will present ECD annual forecasts and recommended budgets for the County Board of Supervisors’ consideration, including information on alternative funding/service levels and Countywide service department charges.
12. 9-1-1 RESERVE ACCOUNT
A The Emergency Communications Department shall regularly report accounting for the 9-1-1 Reserve Account to the Executive Board. As authorized by the County Board of Supervisors, the 9-1-1 Reserve Account will be restricted for expenditures as recommended by the EC boards, with final determination on expenditures to be made by the County and will be maintained in an interestbearing restricted fund, until the funds are expended.
B The purpose of the 9-1-1 Reserve Account is to fiscally support capital expenditures, the future acquisition of major equipment (such as computer systems), and to spread out major expenditures over time, thereby reducing the need for large assessments to the Parties. The 9-1-1 Reserve Account will enable County and the Parties to better prepare budgets and facilitate long term fiscal planning.
C Funds in the 9-1-1 Reserve Account shall be readily accessible to the Emergency Communications Department to use for appropriate expenditures that benefit the Parties and Users.
D The Director shall present 9-1-1 Reserve Account accounting reports to the Executive Board annually or as requested.
E Accumulation of interest in the 9-1-1 Reserve Account will accrue to the benefit of the emergency communications dispatch fund.
13. STANDARD COST SHARING PLAN FOR PARTIES AND USERS
A Until such time that the Department of Emergency Management (DEM) establishes the Emergency Notification Governance and Financing Agreement, Emergency Notification System fees may be billed by the County.
1. DEM, as the administrator of the system, must seek annual approval from the ECD Executive Board to authorize this charge.
2. All other payment provision in this agreement shall apply.
PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
B ECD will invoice each Party separately, either annually, biannually, or quarterly for fees for Dispatch Services, Inform Mobile Licensing, and other special charges to Parties and Users and may include administrative fees that will be recovered to support dispatch operations when invoices are sent for nondispatch/call-taking services (i.e. NGEN & Emergency Notification System).
County will consult with the Executive Board at least 10 days before the start of each fiscal year regarding the frequency of billing and methodology of billing to actual expenses or budgeted expenses per subsection 1 below. The County, through ECD, may exercise its discretion in the timing of invoicing, in order to maintain adequate reserves in the special revenue fund dedicated to provision of 9-1-1 services.
1 In consideration of the foregoing, each Party will pay to the County, on an annual, biannual, or quarterly basis, an amount derived by the formula set forth below based on the year-to-date actual costs or budgeted costs.
2 Invoices shall be sent via email to the email address listed in the signature block of this Agreement. Invoices will be mailed via certified mail ONLY at the written request of the Party or User Agency to the ECD. This mailing address and email address may be changed only with written notice to ECD. An email to the current Director will suffice. 3 The funding formula for user agencies may include 5.0% of the County of Monterey’s total Proposition 172 revenue from the two-year prior audited actual Proposition 172 revenue to offset the total charges incurred by all Parties to this agreement as determined annually by the County of Monterey Board of Supervisors during the budget process.
4 ECD may provide administrate support, including invoicing, to the Parties of this Agreement and may collect fees for this support. 5 The Countywide Cost Allocation Plan will be utilized to capture and bill the indirect costs incurred by the County which are associated with the operations of the County of Monterey Emergency Communications Department.
(remainder of page intentionally left blank)
PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
C Formula Definitions:
A
Actual or budgeted cost of dispatch service (Source: County of Monterey Auditor/Controller’s expenditure or budget report for the Billing Period.) B
Revenues from Miscellaneous Agencies, Administrative Fees, offsetting fund balance, other revenues from entities who are not party to this Agreement including the Ambulance Provider and reimbursements from the State of California.
C Actual or Budgeted Annual cost subject to percentage distribution.
D Most recently available total assessed valuation of real property of the Party per County Assessor.
(Source: “County of Monterey Tax Rates” for the Billing Year.) E Most recently available assessed valuation of real property in the County of Monterey less the assessed valuation of real property attributed to organizations not receiving direct dispatch services. (Source: “Monterey County Tax Rates” per County Assessor for the billing year.) F Most recently available resident population of each Party. (source: for county and cities, “State of California Department of Finance Data” for the billing year and for Fire Districts, “Inventory of Local Agencies” as provided by the Local Agency Formation Commission for the County of Monterey.)
G Most recently available total population of the County of Monterey, less the population of agencies not receiving direct dispatch services. (Source: for county and cities, “State of California Department of Finance Data” and for Fire Districts, “Inventory of Local Agencies” as provided by the Local Agency Formation Commission for the County of Monterey.) H Annual Workload total for each Party from the most recently available calendar year. (Source: Workload totals compiled by the County of Monterey Emergency Communications Department, following review by the Operations Board.)
I Annual Workload total for all law enforcement, fire, special emergency, and other emergency response units for the most recently available calendar year. (Source: Workload totals compiled by the County of Monterey Emergency Communications Department, following review by the Operations Board.)
J Party net percentage (Derived by applying equal weight to Party Percentage of Assessed Valuation, Resident Population and Dispatch Workload.) For Fire Districts and Fire Only Users this net percentage is multiplied by 10%.
Effective July 1, 2026:
• Current Parties to this Agreement who transition to Fire-Only service will no longer be eligible for the 10% multiplier.
Miscellaneous Agencies will continue to not be eligible. • New Parties joining the Agreement after July 1, 2026, that provide both Law and Fire services will also not be eligible for the 10% multiplier. Miscellaneous Agencies will continue to not be eligible.
K Party Gross Bill.
L Party’s Prop 172 offset shall be computed by taking the Party’s original billing and dividing that by the total billing of all Parties subject to Prop 172 reduction, which is a percentage of the total billing. That percentage is multiplied by the total gross Prop 172 amount to derive the individual Party’s percentage share of the Prop 172 funding.
PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
D Cost Allocation Formula:
E In addition to the foregoing formula, the County may, after consultation and recommendations with the EC Boards, augment the formula on a pro rata basis to include provisions of special funding for any purpose such as, but not limited to, adding to the 9-1-1 Reserve Account, supporting needed projects to replace software, hardware, dispatch furniture, major building repair, etc. Withdrawals from the 9-1-1 Reserve Account shall be recommended to the County through the Executive Board.
F The County may consult with the Executive Board and may choose to select other source documents to replace those defined in the Formula Definitions above if the County determines that the new documents provide more accurate information.
G The Workload component of the billing formula will be annually reviewed as part of the budget process. Changes to the Workload component may be recommended to the County by the Executive Board, which changes may be implemented by the County, in its discretion, as appropriate.
H Delinquency. If a Party does not pay its fees for service as set forth above on or before the Due Date, the amount unpaid shall be deemed delinquent. A “Delinquency Fee” in the amount of five percent (5 %) of the delinquent amount shall be added to the amount owed and charged to the Party. The delinquency fee shall be applied to the amount owed (the amount owed includes any previously added delinquency fee) every 30 days until such time the bill is paid in full. If a Party does not pay the delinquent amount and any delinquency fee within 90 calendar days from the original due date from the first invoice, the County is authorized to withhold and offset from any lawful source whatsoever otherwise due to the Party, including the regular apportionment of property tax revenue, an amount sufficient to satisfy the delinquent amount and delinquency fees.
PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
I Billing Dispute: If a Party disputes any portion of an invoice issued under this agreement, it shall notify the County in writing within 15 calendar days of receipt. The notice must include sufficient detail for the County to review and respond. The County shall provide the requested information within 15 calendar days of receiving the notice. If the County is unable to respond within 15 calendar days, the disputing Party shall be relieved of any delinquency fees or penalties on the disputed amount until 15 calendar days after the County provides the requested information. The Party shall pay all undisputed amounts by the original due date. If the dispute remains unresolved after the County’s response, the matter may be escalated to the Executive Board for recommendation. No delinquency fees shall be assessed on the disputed amount while the matter is pending Executive Board review, provided the dispute was submitted in good faith and in compliance with this section. Once the Executive Board has issued a recommendation, the County shall make a final determination in good faith based on that recommendation. Delinquency fees, if any, shall only apply beginning 15 calendar days after the final determination is issued.
14. PAYMENT PROVISIONS FOR MISCELLANEOUS AGENCIES
A ECD shall invoice each Miscellaneous Agency in alignment with the invoicing schedule as outlined in Section 13, subsection B of this Agreement.
B The formula to determine costs is as follows:
Formula Definitions:
A Miscellaneous Agency Workload for the last available calendar year (Source: Workload totals compiled by the County of Monterey Emergency Communications Department, following review by the Operations Board.)
B Annual Workload total for the most recently available calendar year for all law enforcement, fire, special emergency, and other emergency response units for the billing period. (Source: Workload totals compiled by the County of Monterey Emergency Communications Department, following review by the Operations Board.)
C Miscellaneous Agency net percentage
D Actual or budgeted cost of dispatch service (Source: County of Monterey Auditor/Controller’s expenditure or budget report for the Billing Period.) E Charge to the Miscellaneous Agency for the billing year.
Cost Allocation Formula for Miscellaneous Agencies:
PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
C In addition to the foregoing formula, the County may, after consultation and recommendations with the EC Boards, augment the formula on a pro rata basis to include provisions of special funding for any purpose such as, but not limited to, adding to the 9-1-1 Reserve Account, supporting needed projects to replace software, hardware, dispatch furniture, major building repair, etc. Withdrawals from the 9-1-1 Reserve Account shall be recommended to the County through majority vote of the Executive Board.
D The County may consult with the Executive Board and may choose to select other source documents to replace those defined in the Formula Definitions above if the County determines that the new documents provide more accurate information.
E The County of Monterey Emergency Communications Department shall bill each Miscellaneous Agency with the same timing as the other Parties to this Agreement.
F Delinquency. If a Miscellaneous Agency does not pay its fees for service as set forth above on or before the Due Date, the amount unpaid shall be deemed delinquent. A “Delinquency Fee” in the amount of five percent (5 %) of the delinquent amount shall be added to the amount owed and charged to the Miscellaneous Agency. The delinquency fee shall be applied to the amount owed (the amount owed includes any previously added delinquency fee) every 30 days until such time the bill is paid in full. If a Miscellaneous Agency does not pay the delinquent amount and any delinquency fee within 90 calendar days from the Due Date of the original invoice, the County is authorized to withhold and offset from any lawful source whatsoever otherwise due to the Miscellaneous Agency, including the regular apportionment of property tax revenue, an amount sufficient to satisfy the delinquent amount and delinquency fees.
G Billing Dispute: If a Miscellaneous Agency(s) dispute payment owed to County, each Miscellaneous Agency shall notify County within 15 calendar days of its receipt of its invoice. This notice shall include sufficient details about the dispute for County to review and act. County shall provide any requested information within 15 calendar days. If County is unable to respond within 15 calendar days, the Miscellaneous Agency disputing the billing shall be relieved of any delinquency payment until 15 days after the information is provided.
15. ONGOING USE OF 9-1-1 DISPATCH CENTER
A As provided in the Agreement for the Construction and Funding of a Consolidated Dispatch Center for 9-1-1 emergency communications, effective on July 1, 2001, County shall provide the land located at 1322 Natividad Road, PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
Salinas at no cost to the Parties and Users for the duration of its use for the purposes set forth in that agreement and in this agreement.
B The County shall permit ECD to provide the Users emergency communications and dispatch services from the 9-1-1 Dispatch Center of the consolidated Emergency Services Center including its equipment, fixtures, and furnishings for the period of time that the facility is used for 9-1-1 dispatch services.
C The County and the Parties shall be jointly responsible for costs of maintenance of the 9-1-1 Dispatch Center.
16. RECORDS AND CONFIDENTIALITY
A Confidentiality: County and the Parties and Users and their officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws which provide for the confidentiality of records and other information. No Party shall disclose any confidential information, any confidential records, or other confidential information received from any Party to this agreement or prepared in connection with the performance of this agreement, unless the other Party specifically permits such disclosure of records or information. All requests for disclosure of confidential information shall be promptly transmitted to the owner of the information. Notwithstanding these duties of confidentiality, the Parties acknowledge that the Parties and the County are government agencies subject to the California Public Records Act, which requires disclosure of public records subject to exceptions. The Parties and the County will mutually cooperate to comply with the California Public Records Act disclosure obligations, consistent with these confidentiality obligations.
B Maintenance of Records: The County shall prepare, maintain, and preserve all reports and records that may be required by federal, state, or local rules and regulations related to services performed under this agreement. The County shall maintain such records in accordance with the provisions of the County and ECD Record Retention policies. The Parties shall maintain such records inaccordance with their records retention policies. If any litigation, claim, negotiation, audit exception, or other action relating to this agreement is asserted, the County and the Parties shall retain such records until such action is resolved.
17. COUNTY INDEMNIFICATION OF PARTIES AND PARTIES’ WAIVER OF CLAIMS
AGAINST THE COUNTY
A County hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless each Party, its officers, agents, employees, and authorized volunteers from any and all claims, demands, judgments or decrees made or rendered against each Party, its officers, agents or employees by reason of any injury, death or damage suffered or sustained by PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
any person or entity caused by, or alleged to have been caused by or arising out of the provision of the emergency communications services by the County as set forth in this agreement.
B Further, County, at its own cost, expense and risk, shall defend any and all suits, actions, or other legal proceedings arising from the provision of emergency communications services by the County pursuant to this agreement that may be brought or instituted by third parties against each Party, its officers, agents, employees, or authorized volunteers, and shall pay and satisfy any judgment or decree that may be rendered against each Party, its officers, agents or employees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceedings. Each Party agrees to promptly notify County of any suit, action, or other legal proceeding asserted against it by third parties which arises from the provision of emergency communications services as specified in this agreement and each Party agrees to cooperate with County in the defense of such claims.
C In return for and in recognition of County’s acceptance of liability, as set forth above, each Party agrees that it will not sue, make any demand or claim, or otherwise prosecute or assert liability against the County for any claim, demand, judgment, or decree of any nature caused by or arising out of the provision of the emergency communications services by the County set forth in this agreement. This waiver of liability against the County by the Parties applies to claims, demands, judgments or decrees which are asserted by third parties and to claims, demands, judgments or decrees which could be asserted by the Parties against the County.
D Survival of Indemnification and Waiver of Liability Obligations
1. The indemnification and defense obligations assumed by County and the waiver of liability against the County agreed to by the Parties, established above, shall survive the termination of this agreement, the withdrawal of any Party from this Agreement, and the termination of any Party from this Agreement. These obligations and the waiver of liability shall extend to the expiration of the statute of limitations applicable to any claims arising from this agreement and the provision of emergency communications services pursuant to this agreement.
18. INSURANCE
A Without limiting the foregoing indemnification, all Parties shall maintain in force at all times during the performance of this agreement, a policy or policies of insurance as follows, and in the minimum limits of liability as stated herein:
B Comprehensive general liability, including but not limited to premises, personal PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
injuries, products, and completed operations for combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence.
C Comprehensive automobile liability, including but not limited to property damage, bodily injury, and personal injuries for combined single limit of notless than $1,000,000 per occurrence.
D Workers’ Compensation covering statutory requirements of the State of California and Employer’s Liability of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence.
E In the event any Party is lawfully self-insured in any or all of the aforementioned insurance areas, upon the request of a Party a letter certifying those areas of coverage, and in the minimum amounts as set forth in this agreement, shall be furnished to the requesting party prior to execution of this agreement.
F Except with respect to Workers’ Compensation insurance, each Party maintaining commercial insurance or excess insurance shall provide an endorsement naming the County, its officers, agents, and employees as additional insureds and shall provide that such commercial insurance is primary to any other commercial insurance maintained by the County; and the County shall, under any commercial insurance or excess insurance itmaintains, provide an endorsement naming each Party, its officers, agents, and employees as additional insureds and shall provide that such commercial insurance is primary to any other commercial insurance maintained by each Party.
19. GENERAL PROVISIONS
A Amendment. This agreement may be amended or modified only by an instrument in writing signed by all the Parties hereto; except for an Amendment of adding a new Party as described in Section 10 of this Agreement.
B Effect on Existing Agreements:
1. Agreement for 9-1-1 Emergency Communications Dispatch Services (the City and Fire District 9-1-1 Service Agreement): Upon final execution of this agreement by the County and all Parties, the 9-1-1 Service Agreement executed by the County in 2020 and any amendments to that agreement shall terminate and shall no longer be of any force or effect.
2. Agreement for 9-1-1 Emergency Communications Dispatch Services for Miscellaneous Agencies (the miscellaneous agency 9-1-1 Service Agreements): Upon final execution of this agreement by the County and miscellaneous agencies, the 9-1-1 Service Agreement executed by the County in 2020 and any amendments to that agreement shall terminate and shall no longer be of any force or effect.
PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
C Waiver. Any waiver of any terms and conditions hereof must be in writing and signed by the Parties hereto. A waiver of any of the terms and conditions hereof shall not be construed as a waiver of any other terms or conditions in this agreement.
D Successors and Assigns. This agreement and the rights, privileges, duties, and obligations of the Parties hereunder, to the extent assignable or delegable, shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective successors, permitted assigns, and heirs.
E Assignment. No Party may assign, sell, or otherwise transfer its interest or obligations in this agreement without the prior written consent of the County upon the recommendation of the Executive Board. Any organization wishing to participate in this system shall participate through this agreement and may not participate through agreements with other participating agencies. Any such purported assignment is null and void.
F Compliance with Applicable Law. The Parties shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations in performing this agreement.
G Severability. If any part, term or provision of this agreement shall be held void, illegal, unenforceable, or in conflict with any law of a Federal, State or Local Government having jurisdiction over this agreement, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected thereby.
H Heading. The section and paragraph headings are for convenience only and shall not be used to interpret the terms of this agreement.
I Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence in each and all of the provisions of this agreement.
J Governing Law. This agreement shall be governed by and interpreted under the laws of the State of California. Venue of any dispute arising from this agreement shall be in the Superior Court of California, in the County of Monterey.
K Construction of Agreement. The Parties agree that each Party has fully participated in the review and revision of this agreement and that any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not apply in the interpretation of this agreement or any amendment hereto.
L Counterparts. This agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
M Authority. Any individual executing this agreement on behalf of a Party represents and warrants hereby that he or she has the requisite authority to PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
enter into this agreement on behalf of such Party and to bind the Party to the terms and conditions of the same.
N Integration. This agreement, including the exhibits hereto, shall represent the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and shall supersede all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral, between the Parties as of the effective date hereof.
O Change of Address. The mailing addresses, email addresses, phone numbers, and Party contacts may change and it is the responsibility of the Parties to notify the County as specified in paragraph (P) within ten days of said change.
P Notices. Notices required under this agreement shall be emailed or delivered personally or by first-class, postage pre-paid mail as follows:
COUNTY OF MONTEREY
Director of Emergency Communications
1322 Natividad Road
Salinas, CA 93906
831.769.8880 [email protected]
PGCC 5-20-26
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the COUNTY and each of the Agencies have caused this agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representative as of the day and year written above.
COUNTY OF MONTEREY:
Name (printed)
Signature:
Date:
Director of Emergency Communications
Address:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Name (printed)
Signature:
Date:
Deputy County Counsel
APPROVED AS TO FISCAL PROVISIONS:
Name (printed)
Signature:
Date:
Auditor-Controller
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Signature:
Date:
Title
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
City of Del Rey Oaks
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
City of Gonzales
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
City of Greenfield
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
City of King
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
City of Marina
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
City of Monterey
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
City of Pacific Grove
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
City of Salinas
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
City of Sand City
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
City of Seaside
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
City of Soledad
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
Monterey County Regional Fire Protection District
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
Monterey Peninsula Airport District
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
North County Fire Protection District of Monterey County Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
Big Sur Volunteer Fire Brigade
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
Mid-Coast Fire Brigade
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
California State University, Monterey Bay
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Parties (one per page)
9-1-1 Emergency Services and Governance Agreement
2026
Correctional Training/ Salinas Valley State Prison
Duly Authorized Representative
Name (printed)
Title
Signature:
Date:
Mailing Address:
Email:
PGCC 5-20-26
Agenda No. 9 B
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Casey J. Day, Chief of Police
MEETING DATE: May 20, 2026
SUBJECT: Letter of Support for AB 1942 (Bauer - Kahan) - E-Bike: Registration & License Plates
CEQA: {CEQA}
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Issuing a Letter of Support for AB 1942 (Bauer - Kahan) with Amendments, E-Bikes:
Registration & License Plates
DISCUSSION
Electric bicycles (e-bikes) have rapidly increased in popularity across California, offering an accessible, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly transportation option for residents and visitors alike.
However, this growth has also introduced new public safety challenges, particularly related to speed, roadway integration, rider behavior, and inconsistent compliance with existing laws. Local jurisdictions, including the City of Pacific Grove, have experienced these impacts firsthand, especially in areas with high pedestrian traffic and mixed-use pathways.
Under current law, e-bikes are divided into three classifications (Class I, II, and III), each with different operational characteristics and legal requirements. Despite this framework, enforcement remains difficult in practice. Officers in the field often cannot readily distinguish between e-bike classes, particularly when devices have been modified or lack clear identifying features. This creates challenges in ensuring compliance with speed restrictions, helmet laws, and permissible areas of operation, ultimately limiting the effectiveness of existing regulations.
AB 1942 seeks to establish a statewide registration and licensing framework for certain e-bikes, representing a meaningful step toward improving accountability and standardization. A registration system has the potential to support enforcement efforts, deter theft, and provide valuable data to better understand usage patterns and safety trends. However, as currently written, the bill applies only to Class II and Class III e-bikes, which may unintentionally create confusion and limit its effectiveness in the field.
From a local government and public safety perspective, a comprehensive and clearly defined regulatory structure is critical. Expanding the program to include all e-bike classifications would promote consistency, reduce ambiguity, and support equitable enforcement. Additionally, requiring standardized, visible identifiers—such as decals or license plates tied to each classification—would allow officers to quickly assess compliance without relying on time-intensive stops or technical PGCC 5-20-26
verification.
The City also recognizes the importance of balancing regulation with accessibility. E-bikes serve as an important mobility option for many residents, including those who rely on them as an affordable alternative to traditional vehicles. Establishing a reasonable and clearly defined cap on registration fees will help ensure that cost does not become a barrier to use, while still allowing the state to recover legitimate program administration costs.
Finally, while AB 1942 provides tools that may improve safety and accountability, it may also result in increased enforcement and administrative responsibilities for local jurisdictions. As with many state mandates, cities remain concerned about implementation expectations without corresponding resources or funding.
With thoughtful amendments, AB 1942 has the potential to provide a balanced and effective framework that enhances public safety, supports enforcement, and preserves equitable access to e-bikes.
OPTIONS
Direct staff to take alternative action.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact as a result of issuing a letter of support for the proposed legislation.
FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.
Attachments
LetterofSupportPG
LetterofSupportCalCities
PGCC 5-20-26
Phone (831) 648-3106 Fax (831) 657-9361 www.cityofpacificgrove.org ▫ ▫
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue Pacific Grove, California ▫
May 20, 2026
The Honorable Revecca Bauer-Kahan
California State Assembly
State Capitol, Suite 5210
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: AB 1942 (BAUER-Kahan) – Electric Bicycles: Registration and License Plates
SUPPORT IF AMENDED
Dear Assembly Member Bauer-Kahan:
The City of Pacific Grove will support, if amended, AB 1942 (Bauer-Kahan), which requires class 2 and 3 electric bicycles to be registered with the California Department of motor Vehicles (DMV).
AB 1942 represents a significant and necessary step toward establishing a statewide framework to improve accountability, safety, and compliance in the rapidly expanding electric bicycle market. However, we respectfully request the following amendments:
1. Apply the Program to All E-Bike Classifications (Class I, II, and III) Limiting the program to only Class II and Class III devices create enforcement ambiguity and undermines the goal of a clear, consistent regulatory framework. From a city enforcement perspective, distinctions between classifications are not always readily apparent in real time. A comprehensive approach that includes all three classes will improve compliance, reduce confusion, and support equitable application of the law.
2. Establish a Clear and Reasonable Cap on Registration Fees While the bill appropriately limits fees to “reasonable regulatory costs,” additional clarity is needed to ensure affordability and prevent cost barriers—particularly for lower-income residents who rely on e-bikes as an accessible transportation option. A defined, reasonable fee cap will help balance program sustainability with equity considerations and maintain access to this important mobility option.
3. Require Readily Identifiable Visual Markers by Classification For the program to be effective, law enforcement must be able to quickly and reliably identify the classification of an e-bike from a distance. Cal Cities recommend requiring unique visual identifiers, such as color-coded license plates, decals, or other standardized markers for each classification. This will enhance field-level enforcement, improve compliance, and reduce reliance on time-intensive verification methods.
PGCC 5-20-26
From a local government perspective, AB 1942 has the potential to provide meaningful tools to improve safety outcomes, support enforcement, and enhance data collection. At the same time, cities remain concerned about increased enforcement responsibilities without reimbursement and the need for clear, practical implementation standards.
With the amendments outlined above, AB 1942 can strike the appropriate balance between accountability, safety, and accessibility, while providing cities with a workable framework to manage e-bike use in their communities. For these reasons, the City of Pacific Grove will support, if amended, AB 1942 (Bauer-Kahan).
Sincerely,
Nick Smith, Mayor
City of Pacific Grove
Sincerely,
Matthew Mogansen, City Manager
City of Pacific Grove
cc. Senator Shannon Grove & Assembly Member Dawn Addis
Deanna Sessums, Cal-Cities League Regional Public Affairs Manager League of California Cities, [email protected]
PGCC 5-20-26
1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org April 28, 2026
The Honorable Rebecca Bauer-Kahan
California State Assembly
State Capitol
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: AB 1942 (Bauer-Kahan) – Electric Bicycles: Registration and License Plates
SUPPORT IF AMENDED
Dear Assembly Member Bauer-Kahan:
On behalf of the League of California Cities (Cal Cities), I write to express our support for AB 1942, if amended, to strengthen its effectiveness, equity, and enforceability for local governments.
AB 1942 represents a significant and necessary step toward establishing a statewide framework to improve accountability, safety, and compliance in the rapidly expanding electric bicycle market. Cities across California are experiencing increasing challenges related to e-bike safety, rider behavior, and enforcement, particularly as higher-speed devices become more prevalent in dense, multimodal environments. A uniform, stateadministered registration system can provide an important foundation to address these concerns.
As we have shared with your staff, Cal Cities has undertaken a comprehensive, multipronged effort to better understand and respond to the growing impacts of e-bikes in our communities. We conducted a statewide survey of our member cities to identify onthe-ground challenges, enforcement gaps, and priorities for state policy action. In addition, Cal Cities hosted a statewide webinar bringing together local officials, practitioners, and subject matter experts to share best practices and real-world experiences managing e-bike use.
Building on this work, Cal Cities convened a multidisciplinary working group composed of local law enforcement, public works professionals, and city officials. Over several months, this group developed a set of policy recommendations focused on safety, enforceability, and clarity in state law. These updated e-bike policy principles were recently adopted by the Cal Cities Board and reflect a broad local government consensus on the need for clear classifications, practical enforcement tools, and balanced statewide standards.
To ensure AB 1942 aligns with these locally informed priorities and achieves its intended outcomes without creating unintended burdens, Cal Cities respectfully requests the following amendments:
PGCC 5-20-26
1. Apply the Program to All E-Bike Classifications (Class I, II, and III) Limiting the program to only Class II and Class III devices create enforcement ambiguity and undermines the goal of a clear, consistent regulatory framework. From a city enforcement perspective, distinctions between classifications are not always readily apparent in real time. A comprehensive approach that includes all three classes will improve compliance, reduce confusion, and support equitable application of the law.
2. Establish a Clear and Reasonable Cap on Registration Fees While the bill appropriately limits fees to “reasonable regulatory costs,” additional clarity is needed to ensure affordability and prevent cost barriers—particularly for lowerincome residents who rely on e-bikes as an accessible transportation option. A defined, reasonable fee cap will help balance program sustainability with equity considerations and maintain access to this important mobility option.
3. Require Readily Identifiable Visual Markers by Classification For the program to be effective, law enforcement must be able to quickly and reliably identify the classification of an e-bike from a distance. Cal Cities recommend requiring unique visual identifiers, such as color-coded license plates, decals, or other standardized markers for each classification. This will enhance field-level enforcement, improve compliance, and reduce reliance on time-intensive verification methods.
From a local government perspective, AB 1942 has the potential to provide meaningful tools to improve safety outcomes, support enforcement, and enhance data collection.
At the same time, cities remain concerned about increased enforcement responsibilities without reimbursement and the need for clear, practical implementation standards.
With the amendments outlined above, AB 1942 can strike the appropriate balance between accountability, safety, and accessibility, while providing cities with a workable framework to manage e-bike use in their communities.
Sincerely,
Damon Conklin
Legislative Advocate
PGCC 5-20-26
Agenda No. 9 C
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Chaps Poduri, Councilmember
MEETING DATE: May 20, 2026
SUBJECT: Oppose Assembly Bill 1383 (McKinnor): Public Employees’ Retirement Benefits CEQA: {CEQA}
RECOMMENDATION
Approve a formal position of "Oppose" for Assembly Bill 1383 and authorize the Mayor to sign and transmit an opposition letter.
DISCUSSION
Assembly Bill 1383 (McKinnor) proposes significant changes to the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) of 2013. The bill seeks to lower the normal retirement age for public safety members and increase the cap on pensionable compensation. While intended to aid in recruitment and retention, the bill represents an unfunded mandate that would significantly increase pension liabilities for Pacific Grove.
Background
In 2013, the Legislature enacted PEPRA to stabilize the state's retirement system, restore public confidence, and address long-term costs associated with unfunded accrued liabilities. AB 1383 would alter several of these foundational reforms for public safety employees. Key provisions of the bill as amended on January 22, 2026, include:
Lowering retirement age: The bill would reduce the normal retirement age for public safety workers from 57 to 55.
Enhanced benefit formulas: It authorizes the creation of new defined benefit retirement formulas, including a 3% at age 55 formula.
Increased compensation cap: The bill proposes increasing the pensionable compensation cap of approximately $155,000 to align with federal Internal Revenue Service (IRS) limits which are more than 70% higher.
Bargaining flexibility: It allows public employers and employee organizations to negotiate these prospective increases to retirement formulas.
Reasons for opposing AB 1383:
Increased pension liability: The bill would lead to substantial increases in mandated costs for Pacific Grove without providing a dedicated funding source. Statewide, some estimates have costs resulting from AB 1383 to be over $9 billion in 20 years.
Undermining PEPRA reform: PEPRA was a critical step in helping local agencies manage future pension costs and preventing the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) PGCC 5-20-26
pension costs and preventing the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) from potential insolvency. AB 1383 would upend many of these 2013 reforms, potentially reversing a decade of fiscal stabilization.
Fiscal volatility: The potential costs associated with this bill arrive during a period of global financial and economic instability. The combination of market volatility and increased benefit costs could lead to severe financial strain for all cities including Pacific Grove.
Unfunded mandate: While the City supports competitive recruitment, AB 1383 fails to balance sustainable benefits with taxpayer fairness and long-term financial stability.
OPTIONS
None.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Recommendation has no direct impact; if the bill becomes law City would have significant ongoing increases in pension contributions and unfunded liabilities.
GOAL ALIGNMENT: Not Applicable.
Attachments
Proposed Opposition Letter
PGCC 5-20-26
The Honorable Tina McKinnor
Chair, Assembly Committee on Public Employment and Retirement 1020 N Street, Room 153
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: AB 1383 (McKinnor) Public employees’ retirement benefits.
OPPOSE (As Amended January 22, 2026)
Dear Assembly Member McKinnor,
The City of Pacific Grove respectfully opposes AB 1383, which would make several significant changes to public employees’ retirement benefits and lead to increased pension liability for public agencies.
The Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) was designed to address a wide range of issues involving public employee pensions and was a major step in helping local agencies better manage future pension costs and prevent the California Public Employees Retirement System from sliding into insolvency. AB 1383 would upend many of the reforms put in place in 2013 by PEPRA.
While we recognize and appreciate the intent of the bill to support recruitment and retention of essential public safety professionals, the bill would increase mandated costs without funding. The potential cost of this bill comes at a time of uncertainty. The fiscal volatility in the market compounded with the increased benefit costs from this bill could lead to serious cost increases for local government.
While our city supports competitive recruitment and retention for all public employees, AB 1383 represents an unfunded mandate that fails to balance sustainable retirement benefits with taxpayer fairness and long-term financial stability.
For these reasons, the City of Pacific Grove respectfully opposes AB 1383.
Sincerely,
Nick Smith
Mayor
City of Pacific Grove
Cc: (as needed or all of below)
The Honorable Tina McKinnor, Chair, Assembly Committee on Public Employment and Retirement
Honorable Members, Senate Labor, Public Employment and Retirement Committee Senator John Laird
Assemblymember Dawn Addis
League of California Cities
PGCC 5-20-26
Agenda No. 10 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Anna Bornstein, Associate Planner
MEETING DATE: May 20, 2026
SUBJECT: Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes: February 10, 2026 CEQA: {CEQA}
RECOMMENDATION
Receive the minutes.
Attachments
ARB Minutes 02.10.2026
PGCC 5-20-26
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
Tuesday, February 10, 2026, 3:00 P.M.
Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL
Member Brooks called the meeting to order at 3:00 pm with the following members present in the chamber: Brooks, Boyle, Byrne, Sublett, and Carr
2. ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Zoning District/General Plan Designation: N/A
Coastal Zone: N/A
Historic Resources Inventory: N/A
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
Recommended Action: Hold an election of Chair and Vice Chair, and appointment of Secretary, in accordance with the City's Boards, Committees, and Commissions Handbook dated March 20, 2024.
Reference: Anna Bornstein, Associate Planner
ACTION: Member Byrne nominated Member Brooks for Chair of the Architectural Review Board. The nomination was seconded by Member Boyle. A roll call vote was taken, and Member Brooks was elected Chair of the Architectural Review Board by the following 4-0-1 vote:
AYES: Byrne, Boyle, Sublett, Carr
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS: Brooks
ACTION: Chair Brooks nominated Member Byrne for Vice Chair of the Architectural Review Board. The nomination was seconded by Member Sublett. A roll call vote was taken, and Member Byrne was elected Vice Chair of the Architectural Review Board by the following 5-0-0 vote:
AYES: Brooks, Byrne, Boyle, Sublett, Carr
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS: Sublett
ACTION: Chair Brooks nominated Member Sublett for Secretary of the Architectural Review Board. A roll call vote was taken, and Member Sublett was elected Secretary of the Architectural PGCC 5-20-26
Review Board by the following 4-0-1 vote:
AYES: Brooks, Byrne, Boyle, Carr
NOES:
ABSTENTION: Sublett
3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
ACTION: Upon a motion by Vice Chair Byrne and seconded by Secretary Sublett, the Board voted to approve the agenda.
Motion carried 5-0 -0, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Brooks, Byrne, Boyle, Sublett, Carr
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS: Sublett
4. BOARD AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (City-Related Items Only) Aaron Campbell made staff announcements
5. COUNCIL LIAISON ANNOUNCEMENTS
None
6. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
A. Written General Public Comment
None
CONSENT AGENDA
7. REPORTS FOR INFORMATION ONLY
None
8. REPORTS REQUIRING ACTION
A. Minutes of the January 13, 2026, Architectural Review Board Regular Meeting Reference: Anna Bornstein, Associate Planner
Recommended Action: Approve the minutes of the January 13, 2026, Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Board.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
ACTION: Upon a motion by Secretary Sublett and seconded by Vice Chair Byrne, the Board voted to approve the consent agenda.
Motion carried 5-0 -0, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Brooks, Byrne, Boyle, Sublett, Carr
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
PGCC 5-20-26
REGULAR AGENDA
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Architectural Permit 25-0294 for 153 and 155 Sloat Avenue and 160 Central Avenue, Pacific Grove (APNs 006-234-002, -003, and -015)
Zoning District/General Plan Designation: C-1 and C-2 / V-C Coastal Zone: Yes
Historic Resources Inventory: No
CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class I, Existing Facilities
Recommended Action: Approve Architectural Permit 25-0294, subject to the recommended findings, conditions of approval, and Class 1 Categorical Exemption (CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities).
Reference: Joseph Sidor, Contract Planner
The staff report was presented by Contract Planner, Joe Sidor.
The applicant presentation was provided by Ceresa Skinner Public comments were provided by Inge Lorentzen Daumer
ACTION: Upon a motion by Member Boyle and seconded by Vice Chair Byrne, the Board voted to approve Architectural Permit 25-0294, subject to the recommended findings, conditions of approval, and Class 1 Categorical Exemption (CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities).
Motion carried 5-0-0, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Brooks, Byrne, Sublett, Boyle, Carr
NOES:
ABSENT:
B. Architectural Permit (AP) 25-0192 for 1134 Ripple Avenue (APN 006-051-018-000) Zoning District/General Plan Designation: R-1-H/ Medium Density Residential (7.3 du/ac)
Coastal Zone: No
Historic Resources Inventory: No
CEQA: Categorical Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class I, Existing Facilities
Recommended Action: Staff recommends the Architectural Review Board approve Architectural Permit (AP) 25-0192, subject to the findings, recommended conditions, and Class 1 Categorical Exemption (CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities).
Reference: Garrett McCown, Associate Planner
The staff report was presented by Associate Planner, Garrett McCown The applicant presentation was provided by Eric Miller, AIA PGCC 5-20-26
Public comments were provided by Inge Lorentzen Daumer
ACTION: Upon a motion by Vice Chair Byrne and seconded by Member Boyle, the Board voted to approve Architectural Permit (AP) 25-0192, subject to the findings, recommended conditions, and Class 1 Categorical Exemption (CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities).
Motion carried 5-0-0, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Brooks, Byrne, Sublett, Boyle, Carr
NOES:
ABSENT:
10. CONTINUED AND ONGOING BUSINESS
None
11. NEW BUSINESS
None
12. PRESENTATIONS
None
13. NEXT MEETING - March 10, 2026
14. ADJOURNMENT – 3:30pm
PGCC 5-20-26
Agenda No. 10 B
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Sandra Kandell, City Clerk/DEI Coordinator
MEETING DATE: May 20, 2026
SUBJECT: Task Force on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Meeting Minutes; Apirl 13, 2026 CEQA: {CEQA}
RECOMMENDATION
Receive the minutes.
Attachments
DEI Minutes 4-163-26
PGCC 5-20-26
1 DRAFT MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
TASK FORCE ON DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND
INCLUSION
REGULAR MEETING
Monday, April 13, 2026, 6:00 P.M.
Council Chamber – City Hall – 300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA JOIN THE ZOOM WEBINAR TO PARTICIPATE LIVE AT:
https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/Zoom_DEI
1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
Vice-Chair Doneux called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. City Clerk/DEI Coordinator Kandell conducted roll call with the following Task Force members present in person:
Vice-Chair Doneux, Members Fischer and Rubin. Absent: Chair Bui and Secretary Pye.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Action: Upon motion by Vice-Chair Doneux and seconded by Task Force Member Rubin, the Task Force voted 3-0-2, Chair Bui and Secretary Pye absent, to approve the agenda.
3. PRESENTATIONS
4. TASK FORCE AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (City-Related Items Only)
5. COUNCIL LIAISON ANNOUNCEMENTS
6. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
No general public comment received.
A. Written General Public Comment
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Action: Upon motion by Member Rubin and seconded by Member Fisher, the Task Force voted 3-0-2, Chair Bui and Secretary Pye absent, to approve the Consent Agenda.
A. Minutes of the January 12, February 9, and March 9, 2026 Task Force on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Meetings
Action: Approved the minutes.
CEQA: Does not constitute a Project per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378
8. REGULAR AGENDA
A. Resolution Prohibiting the Use of City-Owned Facilities for Civil Immigration Enforcement Activities
PGCC 5-20-26
2 Public comment received from Beth Walker.
Action: Action: Upon motion by Member Fisher and seconded by Member Rubin, the Task Force voted 3-0-2, Chair Bui and Secretary Pye absent, to recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution Prohibiting the Use of City-Owned Facilities for Civil Immigration Enforcement Activities.
9. NEXT MEETING: May 11, 2026 at 6:00 p.m.
10. ADJOURNMENT
The regular meeting was adjourned at 6:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Sandra Kandell
City Clerk/DEI Coordinator
Approved by Vice-Chair:__________________________________________Date____________________ PGCC 5-20-26
Agenda No. 11 A
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Leticia Livian, Human Resources Director
MEETING DATE: May 20, 2026
SUBJECT: Ordinance Amending the Salary Classification Schedule to add Information Technology Analyst Classification
CEQA: {CEQA}
RECOMMENDATION
Introduce and hold a first reading of an ordinance to amend the salary classification schedule to add Information Technology Classification; and
1. 2. Direct that a summary of a proposed ordinance be published as approved by the City Attorney.
DISCUSSION
The City’s salary schedule identifies job classifications that have been approved by Council (e.g., Administrative Technician) and the hourly rates of pay for each classification at each step authorized by the Personnel Rules. Pursuant to Charter Article 25 and the Pacific Grove Municipal Code (PGMC) Section 4.20.280, approval and amendment to the salary schedule must be adopted by the Council.
The City’s Information Technology (IT) functions have historically been supported by a Management Analyst classification. This classification is broadly defined and utilized across multiple departments within the City, encompassing a wide range of administrative and analytical duties that are not specific to information technology.
The Management Analyst assigned to the IT unit resigned. This vacancy provides the City with an opportunity to evaluate the classification structure supporting IT operations and better align job duties with the specialized technical nature of the work performed.
Information Technology functions within the City have evolved significantly and now require specialized technical expertise, including systems administration, cybersecurity, network management, and support for enterprise applications. The current Management Analyst classification does not adequately reflect these technical responsibilities, which may limit the City’s ability to effectively recruit and retain qualified candidates.
Creating a dedicated Information Technology Analyst classification will:
More accurately reflect the technical duties and responsibilities of the position Better meet the needs of the City by incorporating the true responsibilities, duties and level of expertise demanded of this important position
PGCC 5-20-26
Align the City’s job classifications with industry standards and comparable public agencies Improve recruitment outcomes in a highly competitive labor market, particularly given the City’s proximity to Silicon Valley
Support retention by offering a compensation structure consistent with market conditions To ensure the proposed classification is competitively positioned, the City engaged Bryce Consulting Services to conduct a salary survey. The survey results indicate that a revised salary range is necessary to remain competitive within the regional labor market for IT professionals.
The proposed hourly salary range for IT Analyst is outlined below.
Classification Step Step Step Step Step Step Step
238-000 1A 2B 3C 4D 5E 6F 7G
Information Technology Analyst $48.80 $51.24 $53.81 $56.50 $59.32 $61.55 $63.85 The creation of a dedicated Information Technology Analyst classification represents a strategic opportunity to modernize the City’s workforce structure, better align job duties with industry standards, and enhance the City’s ability to attract and retain qualified IT professionals. Staff recommends adoption of the proposed classification and salary range.
OPTIONS
1. Take no action
2. Provide alternative direction to staff.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The proposed classification and salary adjustment are expected to result in an estimated additional annual cost of approximately $19,451 to the General Fund for base salary, along with an estimated $14,503 in additional costs for benefits and payroll taxes. These costs will be offset by a reduction in the budget for IT contract services in the General Fund and incorporated into the Fiscal Year 2026–2027 budget. Recruitment for this position is anticipated to be completed in July of this year, at which time the associated costs will begin to be realized.
FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.
Attachments
Classification Description
Ordinance
PGCC 5-20-26
City of Pacific Grove
Established Date: 5/20/2026
Information Technology Analyst Pacific Grove 1 of 3
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST
SUMMARY: Under general supervision, performs professional level work in administering, securing, maintaining, implementing, analyzing, testing and managing the City’s information systems, networks and related infrastructure; works with users to analyze, troubleshoot and resolve system issues, and implements system improvements in the areas of software development, database administration, security administration, network and server administration, and service desk management. This role ensures reliable and secure technology services for staff and the public, supports compliance with regulatory requirements, and contributes to modernization initiatives that enhance operational efficiency and public service delivery.
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS: -- As defined under the Americans with Disabilities Act, essential functions may include any of the following representative duties, knowledge, and skills. This is not a comprehensive listing of all functions and duties performed by incumbents of this class; employees may be assigned duties which are not listed below; reasonable accommodations will be made as required. The job description does not constitute an employment agreement and is subject to change at any time by the employer. Essential duties and responsibilities may include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Consult and collaborate with departments, vendors and technical staff to assess technology needs, define requirements, and implement projects, upgrades, and improvements. • Analyze and solve operating problems, make system modifications as necessary, evaluate and make recommendations regarding requests from departments related to information systems.
• Administer maintain and test computer systems, networks, firewalls, switches, and enterprise services ensuring optimal performance, reliability, and compliance with regulatory requirements.
• Provide advanced technical support and troubleshooting for complex system and network issues; provide systems support including analysis, diagnosis, maintenance and troubleshooting of hardware and software.
• Provide systems support for the City’s network and server infrastructure, including analysis, diagnosis, maintenance and troubleshooting; design, develop, test, implement, troubleshoot, monitor and maintain LAN and WLAN network, server systems and wireless equipment to measure performance, identify deviations from existing service levels and implement timely solutions to issues adversely affecting network performance and systems. • Develop and document procedures, system designs, and security measures. • Respond to service requests and incidents, deliver service desk coverage and on-call support as needed.
• Monitor and improve IT operations through automation, scripting, and best practices. • Assist in planning and implementing system security, backup, and recovery procedures. • Maintain audit-ready documentation, stay current with emerging technologies and recommend improvements to enhance efficiency, security, and business continuity, • Forecast technology needs of City programs, including but not limited to, PC replacements, and printer replacements.
• Evaluate operations and activities of customer support, recommend improvements and modifications, prepare various reports on operations and activities. • Provide responsive and professional customer service and technical support to end-users PGCC 5-20-26
Information Technology Analyst Pacific Grove 2 of 3
via onsite, phone or remote access tools.
• Assist end-users through training, documentation, and guidance on hardware, software, and applications.
• Perform other duties as assigned.
TYPICAL QUALIFICATIONS:
Education, Training, and Experience Guidelines:
• Minimum Qualifications: Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science, Information Technology AND minimum 2 years of experience in IT systems administration and network management within a professional business or municipal environment, OR an equivalent combination of education, training, and experience.
Preferred certifications but not required:
• Systems & Infrastructure: CompTIA Network+, CompTIA Server+ • Microsoft Environment: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Associate; Microsoft Certified:
Windows Server
Knowledge of:
• Enterprise Microsoft environments (Windows Server, Active Directory, Entra ID, Microsoft 365) across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid infrastructure (Azure/AWS). • Principles and practices of network architecture and operations, including routing, switching, wireless, firewalls, segmentation, secure remote access, and core protocols (TCP/IP, DNS, DHCP, VLANs, VPNs).
• Enterprise security and compliance frameworks (NIST CSF, CIS Controls, Zero Trust), including IAM (MFA, RBAC, SSO), endpoint protection, patch management, SIEM/log monitoring, and vulnerability remediation.
• Backup and disaster recovery strategy aligned to defined RPO/RTO objectives. • Automation and infrastructure management using PowerShell/Bash and Infrastructure as Code (Terraform, Ansible).
• Systems architecture and operating systems (Windows, macOS, Linux), MDM/UEM, unified communications, and A/V systems.
• Public-sector compliance standards (ADA/WCAG, records retention, audit readiness) and strong analytical, documentation, and collaboration skills. • Applicable laws, codes, policies and standards.
• Principles and techniques of troubleshooting for desktop computers, software, and printers in a network environment.
• Principles and practices of software development, testing and deployment. • Skills in:
• Analyzing operational requirements and implementing secure, cost-effective technology solutions aligned with public-service mandates and statutory obligations. • Administering and securing servers, endpoints, identity platforms, networks, and communications systems, ensuring configuration integrity, performance optimization, and compliance.
• Managing incidents, service requests, change/release processes, and vendor escalations in alignment with ITIL practices and mission-critical priorities. • Training or instructing users in the use of computer equipment and operating procedures.
PGCC 5-20-26
Information Technology Analyst Pacific Grove 3 of 3
• Implementing and enforcing IAM controls, network segmentation, secure data sharing, and interagency connectivity.
• Monitoring infrastructure health and security using observability and log management tools; maintaining CMDB accuracy and audit-ready documentation. • Planning, testing, and maintaining backup and disaster recovery capabilities. • Automate operational workflows and infrastructure deployments; maintain version-controlled runbooks and technical documentation.
• Evaluating and recommending technical solutions.
• Produce reports and recommendations; collaborate across departments, public safety stakeholders, vendors, and partner agencies.
• Communicating clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing. • Fostering effective working relationships with all levels of staff.
LICENSE AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS:
A valid California State Driver’s License in good standing is required for driving on City business.
PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT:
Work is performed in a standard office environment. Able to lift 25 lbs. at a time and be able to stand for periods at a time. May be required to work extended or irregular hours. Some field work may be required.
CLASS HISTORY
Class/Job Code: 238-000
Bargaining Unit: Management Employee Association (MEA)
EEO4 Category: Professional
Established Date: 5/20/2026
Worker’s Comp Code: Office/Administrative
FLSA Status: Exempt
PGCC 5-20-26
ORDINANCE NO. 26 -
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
AMENDING THE SALARY CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE TO ADD
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST CLASSIFICATION
Findings
1. The City has historically utilized the classification of Management Analyst within the Information Technology (IT) unit, a broad classification used across multiple departments; and
2. The recent resignation of the Management Analyst assigned to the IT unit provides the City with an opportunity to evaluate and update its classification structure; and
3. The duties performed within the IT unit require specialized technical knowledge and skills that are not adequately reflected in the Management Analyst classification; and
4. The creation of an Information Technology Analyst classification will better align job duties with industry standards and improve the City’s ability to recruit and retain qualified candidates in a highly competitive labor market; and
5. The City engaged Bryce Consulting Services to conduct a salary survey using the City’s established comparator agencies and the results of the salary survey support the establishment of a competitive salary range for the new classification; and
6. The City Council desires to amend the Salary Schedule to add the classification of Information Technology Analyst and establish the associated salary range: and
7. Amendment to the salary schedule classification plan must be adopted by the City Council pursuant to Pacific Grove Municipal Code (PGMC) Section 4.20.280; and
8. In the enactment of this ordinance, the City followed the guidelines adopted by the State of California and published in the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000, et seq. Enactment of this ordinance action does not constitute a “project” as defined by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment pursuant Section 15378.
Ordinance
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The foregoing findings of the City Council are incorporated into this Ordinance as if set forth in full.
SECTION 2. The position classification plan approved and adopted by the City Council pursuant to PGMC § 4.20.280 is amended to add the Information Technology classification with the following salary schedule:
Classification - Hourly Rates Step
1A
Step
2B
Step
3C
Step
4D
Step
5E
Step
6F
Step
7G
PGCC 5-20-26
Job Code 238-000
Information Technology Analyst 48.80 51.24 53.81 56.50 59.32 61.55 63.85 SECTION 3. The City Manager is directed to execute all documents and to perform all other necessary City acts to implement this Ordinance.
SECTION 4. Upon approval at second reading, this ordinance shall be given an effective date of June 7, 2026.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE this 3rd day of June 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
NICK SMITH, Mayor
ATTEST:
SANDRA KANDELL, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ALEX LORCA, City Attorney
PGCC 5-20-26
Agenda No. 11 B
CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
300 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lori Frati, Finance Manager
MEETING DATE: May 20, 2026
SUBJECT: Downtown Business Improvement District (BID) Program for Fiscal Year 2026-27
CEQA: {CEQA}
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
Hold a public hearing to determine that majority protest to the annual assessment were not received.
1. Adopt the resolution approving the annual report, approving the Program of Expenditures, assessing the levy, and appointing an advisory board for the Downtown Business Improvement District for Fiscal Year 2026-27
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement allowing the Pacific Grove Chamber of Commerce to administer the BID budget.
3. 4. Take an alternative action.
DISCUSSION
In 2000, the City established the Downtown Pacific Grove Business Improvement District (BID), appointed an advisory board, and levied assessments for the District. The assessments may be used only for the promotion, marketing and advertising of professional and retail businesses located in the district, and for general maintenance to benefit those businesses. All businesses located in the BID are assessed an amount equal to 35% of their business license tax. The assessment is collected together with the business license tax payment in July of each assessment year. Since its formation in 2000, the BID and assessments have been annually reauthorized.
At its May 6, 2026, meeting, the City Council approved a Resolution of Intent to levy the BID assessment for Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-27 and set a public hearing to consider the levy for May 20, 2026. California Streets and Highways Code Section 36525 provides that the District shall not be formed if written protests are received from the owners of businesses in the proposed area that will pay 50 percent or more of the assessments proposed to be levied. Staff advertised the public hearing pursuant to relevant State and Municipal Code sections. Staff has received no protest petitions as of this writing.
Staff is recommending to exercise the right to retain an administration fee equal to one percent (1%) of the assessment amount collected. This 1% administration fee will be deducted quarterly and noted on PGCC 5-20-26
the District's quarterly payout statement, which is estimated to be $300.00 for FY 2026-27.
The District’s annual report (Attachment 1) lists the results of the election of Board Members, details revenues and expenditures for FY 2025-26, proposes a budget for FY 2026-27, and requests the levy of an assessment for FY 2026-27. No changes to BID boundaries are recommended for FY 2026-27.
City Council Resolution 07-042 (Attachment 2) outlines the requirements for re-establishing the district. The terms of the Resolution have been met as indicated by the specific points of compliance set forth below:
Process for Advisory Board appointment: Per the resolution, the Chamber of Commerce facilitated a noticing of all properties in the BID and a meeting of the BID Advisory Board to fill Advisory Board seats that will expire on June 30, 2026. Results of the election from the Chamber of Commerce are included in the report with the following recommended Advisory Board for next year:
Marietta Bain (Fandango Restaurant), term expires June 30, 2027 Stephanie Loftus (The Quill), term expires June 30, 2027 Berk Guenc (Passionfish), term expires June 30, 2027
Mike Durrant (Hops and Fog), term expires June 30, 2027 Allyson Wieland (The Vague Collection), term expires June 30, 2028 Alessandro Bush (Mechanics Bank), term expires June 30, 2028 Coby Shammas (Block Wine Bar), term expires June 30, 2028 All Board Advisory members are current on their licenses.
Contract with Chamber of Commerce for services: The City contracted with the Chamber of Commerce to administer the BID program in compliance with the plan approved by the City Council.
The attached report from the Chamber shows the expenditures for the FY 2026-27 budget.
Chamber of Commerce financial reporting: The FY 2025-26 BID report from the Chamber includes BID expenditure activity for current fiscal year to date.
Proposed FY 2026-27 BID Program. The BID’s current and projected financial information, as provided by the Chamber of Commerce, is included in Attachment 1.
The BID Advisory Board recommends the following allocation of BID assessment revenue for FY PGCC 5-20-26
The BID Advisory Board recommends the following allocation of BID assessment revenue for FY 2026-26, which is estimated to total $31,000, which includes a $1,000 prior year carry over:
Proposed BID Expenditure Budget for FY 2026-27
Downtown Improvements/Signage $14,000
Operations Events/Promotion 5,500
Community Projects 2,500
Marketing Opportunities/Advertising 7,000
Administration 2,000
Total $31,000
OPTIONS
1. Decline to adopt the Resolution.
2. Adopt a modified Resolution.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The City acts as the administrative pass-through to the BID. The assessed funds may only be used for BID purposes and not for any other City purpose.
FOCUSED PRIORITY AREA: Not Applicable.
Attachments
BID Reso
BID Annual Report
Resolution No. 07-042
BID Agreement FY2026-27
PGCC 5-20-26
RESOLUTION NO. 26-xxx
APPROVING THE ANNUAL REPORT, APPROVING THE PROGRAM OF
EXPENDITURES, ASSESSING THE LEVY, AND APPOINTING AN ADVISORY
BOARD FOR THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
FINDINGS
1. The City Council conducted a public hearing to consider the levy of the proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-27 assessment for the Pacific Grove Downtown Business Improvement District on May 20, 2026, at 6:00 pm; and
2. The City Clerk gave notice of the public hearing by causing the Resolution of Intention, adopted by the City Council on May 20, 2026, to be published in a newspaper of general circulation at least seven days before the public hearing; and
3. At the public hearing, the City Council heard and considered all protests against the fiscal year 2026-27 levy of assessments for the Downtown Pacific Grove Business Improvement District, and the rules and procedures used in receiving and considering protests complied with those set forth in Streets and Highways Code sections 36524, 36525 and 36534 (“Improvement Area Law”); and
4. Said Improvement Area Law provides, at California Street and Highways Code Section 36530, that the City Council shall appoint an advisory board to make recommendations to the City Council regarding expenditure of revenues collected from District business owners, and to make recommendations regarding the method and basis of assessment levy; and
5. The City Council requested that the Pacific Grove Chamber of Commerce recommend membership for the advisory board by a process of public nomination and election, and the Chamber has made recommendations that the City Council wishes to accept.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE:
1. The City Council determines that each of the Findings set forth above is true and correct and by this reference incorporates those Findings as an integral part of this Resolution.
2. The City hereby levies and shall collect assessments for the Fiscal Year 2026-27 within the Downtown Pacific Grove Business Improvement District (BID), as described in Section 6.50.010 of the Pacific Grove Municipal Code and retain 1% of assessment revenues collected to cover administration costs.
3. There is no change in the boundaries of the district as established in the prior year and set forth in Section 6.50.020 of the Pacific Grove Municipal Code.
PGCC 5-20-26
4. The Council approves the annual report prepared by the Advisory Board of the Downtown Pacific Grove Business Improvement District.
5. The City Council approves the Downtown Business Improvement District program for FY 2026-27, as follows:
Proposed BID
Expenditure
for FY 2026-27
Administration $ 2,000
Operations Events/Promotional 5,500
Marketing Opportunities/Advertising 7,000
Community Projects 2,500
Downtown Improvements/Signage 14,000
Total $31,000
6. The City Manager is authorized to approve an agreement with the Pacific Grove Chamber of Commerce to administer the program for FY 2026-27.
7. The City Manager is authorized to approve mid-year amendments to the program and agreement with the Pacific Grove Chamber of Commerce within the total amount approved for the year.
8. Pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 26530, the City Council hereby appoints the following (named with their business affiliations) as the advisory board for and on behalf of the Downtown Business Improvement District:
Marietta Bain (Fandango Restaurant), term expires June 30, 2027 Stephanie Loftus (The Quill), term expires June 30, 2027 Berk Guenc (Passionfish), term expires June 30, 2027
Mike Durrant (Hops and Fog), term expires June 30, 2027 Allyson Wieland (The Vague Collection), term expires June 30, 2028
Alessandro Bush (Mechanics Bank), term expires June 30, 2028 Coby Shammas (Block Wine Bar), term expires June 30, 2028
9. The advisory board hereby appointed is subject to all provisions of the Ralph M.
Brown Act, and the board hereby is directed to comply therewith.
10. This Resolution shall become effective immediately following passage and adoption thereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE this 20th day of May 2026, by the following vote:
PGCC 5-20-26
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
NICK SMITH, Mayor
ATTEST:
SANDRA KANDELL, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ALEX LORCA, City Attorney
PGCC 5-20-26
Post Office Box 167 • Pacific Grove, CA 93950 • 831-373-3304 • pacificgrove.org April 1, 2026
To: Lori Frati - Finance Manager
From: Christi Metzner – Pacific Grove Chamber of Commerce Subject: Downtown Business Improvement District (BID) Report In accordance with the City's agreement with the Pacific Grove Chamber of Commerce (PGCC), I am submitting the BID annual report.
Introduction
As businesses nationwide navigate an evolving economic landscape, our district has demonstrated remarkable resilience and adaptability. Despite recent challenges, including fluctuating market conditions and workforce dynamics, our local enterprises have continued to innovate and thrive. This past year has underscored the strength and collaborative spirit of our business community, positioning us well for sustainable growth in the future. The following are a few examples of successes and challenges.
• Over the past fiscal year, the cost of consumer goods and services has continued to rise due to sustained economic pressures, including higher costs of raw materials, increased payroll expenses, and elevated operating costs. Tariffs have also had a direct impact on pricing, adding additional strain for many businesses. While sales tax data suggests a strong rebound, many businesses are still experiencing little to no growth in their bottom line as they work to absorb or pass along these increased costs.
• Employers in coastal communities, such as Pacific Grove, compete heavily for out of the directarea workforce, due to a myriad of factors including a lack of localized workforce housing, dwindling access to public transportation, and a decades long decline in high school student job seeking. This dynamic creates a challenge for employers to attract and retain talent. Businesses still struggle with consistency in their workforce.
• Chase Bank and US Bank buildings (corners of Lighthouse and Forest Avenues) are for lease with potential tenants for US Bank. Chase Bank is under renovation and completion date TBD and still unknown if a new tenant will be occupying the space. The Pier 1 building at 490 Lighthouse Avenue has been leased to Sotheby’s Real Estate, and they will move out of their current location at 574 Lighthouse Avenue this year. The property will remain vacant until the earthquake retrofit is completed. 581 Lighthouse Avenue was only vacant for a few weeks before Fat Willy’s Antiques moved in. There are a couple vacancies in the Central Avenue business district, and Country Club Gate Plaza has several vacancies and a new property management company. Kidwell’s Paint Company will be moving to Forest Hill Plaza. • Restaurants and businesses are doing well, and we are already noticing more visitors since the opening of the Kimpton Mirador hotel in February 2026. Crema PG is open at Lovers Point. • Home sales continue to be strong, which have a positive effect on the home building industry sector.
Election Board Members
On April 1, 2026, a publicly noticed BID special election meeting was held at the City Manager’s Conference Room at City Hall and on Zoom. In addition, a notice of the meeting was emailed to every BID member on the City's business license list that is located within the BID boundaries. The following PGCC 5-20-26
Post Office Box 167 • Pacific Grove, CA 93950 • 831-373-3304 • pacificgrove.org three Advisory Board members were approved by a unanimous vote to serve on the BID from July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2028:
• Coby Shammas – The Block Wine Bar
• Allyson Wieland – The Vague Collection
• Alessandro Bush – Mechanics Bank
They will re-join the following BID Advisory Board members:
• Stephanie Loftus – The Quill
• Marietta Bain – Fandango Restaurant
• Mike Durrant – Hops & Fog Brewing
• Berk Guenac - Passionfish
Income/Beginning Balance
The beginning balance of the BID account on July 1, 2025 was $23,054.57. As of February 28, 2026, the BID total program income was $29,662.20.
Expenditures Report
Last year, the BID proposed a balanced expenditure program. Attached is the profit and loss budget comparison.
Since July 1, 2025, the expenditures for the BID are below:
BID Administration $2,000
Bin King $2,580
Listing all BID hospitality businesses in the Tourist Guide $3,500 Trick-or-Treat (2026) $1,727
Holiday Open House (2026) $ 339
Shop Sip and Stroll (2026) $1,357
Print & Online Advertising $1,121
Total BID investments to date $12,624
Between now and June 30, 2026, we anticipate the below expenses to finish out this fiscal year:
Bin King shared contract (BID portion) $ 1,320
Donation to Youth Ambassadors of PG $ 2,500
Allocated Funds for Downtown Directional Signage $10,000 Marketing $ 2,300
Total upcoming BID investments $16,120
Direction
In 2026-27, the BID direction will continue to focus on promotions, advertising and supporting annual downtown events such as the Halloween Trick or Treat, Shop Small Business Saturday Holiday Open House, Shop, Sip and Stroll for the Holidays, and First Friday events. The focus of the BID will be concentrated in four main areas:
• Beautification projects for the downtown districts
• New directional signage downtown
PGCC 5-20-26
Post Office Box 167 • Pacific Grove, CA 93950 • 831-373-3304 • pacificgrove.org • Supporting and promoting existing and new events and programs to attract foot traffic downtown
Anticipated costs, revenues, number of licenses, and activities to be provided in Fiscal Year 2026-27 include, but are not limited to, promotion, marketing, and advertising of businesses in the district, support for special events, and general maintenance to benefit businesses within the BID. Reporting on the estimated 2026-27 fiscal year activities, the BID has 289 members and revenues are estimated at $30,000 including $1,000 carryover.
Closing
Downtown Pacific Grove continues to evolve and feel more vibrant than ever, as we remain committed to supporting beautification efforts that showcase the charm and character of our downtown.
Thank you.
Respectfully submitted by:
Christi Metzner
BID Administrator
PGCC 5-20-26
Business Improvement District
Profit & Loss Proposed Budget Overview
July 2026 – June 2027
Ordinary Income/Expense July 1, ’26 – June 30, ‘27
Income
Program Income
Carry Over, Prior Year, Mktg 1,000.00
City Assessment 30,000.00
Total Program Income 31,000.00
Total Income 31,000.00
Expenses
Total Administration 2,000.00
Total Community Projects 2,500.00
Total Marketing Opportunities/Advertising 7,000.00
Total Operations Events/Promotion 5,500.00
Downtown Improvements/Signage 14,000.00
Total Expenses 31,000.00
Net Ordinary Income 0.00
Net Income 0.00
+
PGCC 5-20-26
Jul '25 - Feb 26 Budget $ Over Budget % of Budget
Ordinary Income/Expense
Income
Program Income
Carry Over, Prior Year, Mktg 0.00 1,000.00 -1,000.00 0.0% City Assessment 29,662.20 30,000.00 -337.80 98.9%
Total Program Income 29,662.20 31,000.00 -1,337.80 95.7% Total Income 29,662.20 31,000.00 -1,337.80 95.7%
Expense
Administration 0.00 2,000.00 -2,000.00 0.0%
Advertising 1,656.48 7,000.00 -5,343.52 23.7%
Community Projects 0.00 2,500.00 -2,500.00 0.0%
Marketing Opportunities 0.00 9,500.00 -9,500.00 0.0%
Operations 5,466.58 10,000.00 -4,533.42 54.7%
Total Expense 7,123.06 31,000.00 -23,876.94 23.0%
Net Ordinary Income 22,539.14 0.00 22,539.14 100.0%
Net Income 22,539.14 0.00 22,539.14 100.0%
8:19 PM Business Improvement District
03/10/26 Profit & Loss Budget vs. Actual
Accrual Basis July 2025 through February 2026
PGCC 5-20-26
Jul '25 - Feb 26 Jul '24 - Feb 25 $ Change % Change
Ordinary Income/Expense
Income
Program Income
City Assessment 29,662.20 29,889.16 -226.96 -0.8%
Total Program Income 29,662.20 29,889.16 -226.96 -0.8%
Total Income 29,662.20 29,889.16 -226.96 -0.8%
Expense
Advertising 1,656.48 5,534.00 -3,877.52 -70.1%
Community Projects 0.00 2,500.00 -2,500.00 -100.0%
Marketing Opportunities 0.00 4,387.82 -4,387.82 -100.0% Operations
Events/Promotions 2,658.87 7,562.08 -4,903.21 -64.8%
Supplies 227.71 0.00 227.71 100.0%
Operations - Other 2,580.00 0.00 2,580.00 100.0%
Total Operations 5,466.58 7,562.08 -2,095.50 -27.7%
Total Expense 7,123.06 19,983.90 -12,860.84 -64.4%
Net Ordinary Income 22,539.14 9,905.26 12,633.88 127.6% Net Income 22,539.14 9,905.26 12,633.88 127.6%
8:21 PM Business Improvement District
03/10/26 Profit & Loss Prev Year Comparison
Accrual Basis July 2025 through February 2026