OF PACIFIC RECEIVED
City of Pacifica MAR 1 7 2022
APPEAL FORM in person
CITY CLERK
INSTRUCTIONS: TO FILE AN APPEAL, COMPLETE THIS FORM AND FILE IT WITH THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, CITY HALL, 540 CRESPI DRIVE, PACIFICA, CA 94044, NO LATER THAN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE DECISION (POSTMARK DATE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED), TOGETHER WITH ANY REQUIRED APPEAL FEE. (ONLINE PAYMENTS INCUR A $3.00 ADD'L CONVENIENCE FEE.) YOU WILL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF THE HEARING DATE FOR YOUR APPEAL.
APPELLANT: FILL IN BLANKS AND CHECK APPROPRIATE BOXES BELOW. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY. ($523.00 FEE IS REQUIRED PER APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION(S), IF FILED BY NON-APPLICANT) ($405.00 FEE IS REQUIRED PER APPEAL OF HERITAGE TREE REMOVAL PERMIT) PROPOSED PROJECT: file it APPELLANT:
Title/Name: 570 Crespi Drive troie 2010-004 Name: _ Margaret Goatale Address:_ 540 + 570 Crespi En Address:
Applicant/Developer: Brendan Murphy Phone (Day):
DECISION OF (check one): DECISION DATE: I Mai, 22 Email Address:
Planning Commission • Parks, Beaches & Recreation Division • City Staff (Title):
DECISION AT ISSUE: APPROVAL Or DENIAL of:
L Use Permit LA Site Development Permit • Tentative Subdivision Map L Animal Permit L EIR or Negative Declaration • Coastal Development Permit Administrative Decision Variance Parking Exception • Home Occupation Permit X Tree Removal Permit • Other_ DESCRIBE DECISION BEING APPEALED: G.P. amendment GPA-16-19, Rezoning KK-19410s Zoning lext Amendment TA-116-19: Development Aureement DA-4-21: Site Develooment Permit PSD-8H-K6:
Use Permit UP-76-l4; Tentative Subdivision Map SUB-233-16; Sign Permit 5-129-19; Parking Exception PE-183-19; and Heritage Tree Renoval Authovization DESCRIBE GROUNDS FOR APPEAL: The Planning Commission approvals violate thi linof citica Musician Code, the lity or Pacifica Housia Element, the Enof bacitica Aldow Mimket Rate(Inclusionara) Prevam (746-CS), the City of Pacifica Heritage Tree Outinance, the California Envivonmental Qualitu Act (CELA, and the CELA guidelines, including but not limited to substantial evidence supporting a fair arcoment it the proiect man have significant adverse impuets ancithus an EnvironmentalImpact Report mustbe APPELLANT'S RELATIONSHIP TO THE ITEM BEING APPEALED? (check one: Pried till seri need the rolan. • Project Applicant • Neighbor / Concerned Citizen • other The project cannut be afireved because The niger he neil ta was and , Mar. 22
APPELLANT'S SIGNATURE:
Received By: Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Fee Paid: • Cash A Check • online Receipt Date: 3/17/2022 Receipt # 39959
City Clerk's Office Use Only Rev. 01/6/2022