Cities Index.
Attachment I - Appeal Form

Pacifica City Council
November 14, 2022

Document
Attachment I - Appeal Form
Meeting
November 14, 2022
Body
Pacifica City Council
Original file
1.6 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pacificacityca.iqm2.com. That file is the official record.

NOT PACIEN RECEIVED
City of Pacifica OCT 13 2022

APPEAL FORM CITY CLERK
INSTRUCTIONS: TO FILE AN APPEAL, COMPLETE THIS FORM AND FILE IT WITH THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, CITY HALL, 540 CRESPI DRIVE, PACIFICA, CA 94044, NO LATER THAN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE DECISION (POSTMARK DATE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED), TOGETHER WITH ANY REQUIRED APPEAL FEE. (ONLINE PAYMENTS INCUR A $3.00 ADD'L CONVENIENCE FEE.) YOU WILL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF THE HEARING DATE FOR YOUR APPEAL.

APPELLANT: FILL IN BLANKS AND CHECK APPROPRIATE BOXES BELOW. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY. ($550.00 FEE IS REQUIRED PER APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION(S), IF FILED BY NON-APPLICANT) ($426.00 FEE IS REQUIRED PER APPEAL OF HERITAGE TREE REMOVAL PERMIT) PROPOSED PROJECT: APPELLANT:

Title/Name: Seaweed Holistics, LLC Name: Ana Leano-Williams Address: 450 Dondee Way, Ste. 2, Pacifica Address: Derry Way, SSF, CA 94080 Applicant/Developer: Ana Leano-Williams Phone (Day):

DECISION OF (check one): DECISION DATE: Email Address: [email protected] E Planning Commission Parks, Beaches & Recreation Division • City Staff (Title):

DECISION AT ISSUE: APPROVAL or • DENIAL of:
= Use Permit • Site Development Permit Tentative Subdivision Map Animal Permit • EIR or Negative Declaration Coastal Development Permit Administrative Decision • Variance • Parking Exception Home Occupation Permit Tree Removal Permit Other DESCRIBE DECISION BEING APPEALED:

Revocation of Seaweed Holistics, LL's Cannabis Activity Permit DESCRIBE GROUNDS FOR APPEAL:

The Planning Commission's inequitable decision to revoke the Cannabis Activity Permit was based on a misapplication of the City's storefront window glazing ordinance/requirements. The project's existing window glazing is compliant with the ordinance. Appellant disputes the $25,962.89 in assessed fees largely and inappropriately incurred by the City to address the window glazing non-issue.

APPELLANT'S RELATIONSHIP TO THE ITEM BEING APPEALED? (check one):

E Project Applicant O Neighbor • Concerned Citizen, • Other APPELLANT'S SIGNATURE: X DATE: 10/13/2022
Received By. Sarch Colly, City Clerk, Fee Paid: M Cash • Check • Online Receipt Date: 10/13/2022 _ Receipt # 40779
City Clerk's Office Use Only Rev. 07/01/2022

← All documents from this meeting