CITY OF PACIFICA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Council Chambers
2212 Beach Blvd
Pacifica, CA 94044
Mayor Tygarjas Bigstyck
Mayor pro Tem Sue Vaterlaus
Councilmember Sue Beckmeyer
Councilmember Mary Bier
Councilmember Christine Boles
City Council Regular Meeting 1 January 23, 2023
SPECIAL and REGULAR MEETING
JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
January 23, 2023 (MONDAY)
www.cityofpacifica.org
Off-street parking is allowed by permit for attendance at official public meetings.
Vehicles parked without permits are subject to citation. You should obtain a permit from the rack in the lobby and place it on the dashboard of your vehicle in such a manner as is visible to law enforcement personnel.
PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES DURING MEETING
Alternative Ways to Observe and Participate in the Meeting:
The primary method for observing and participating in the meeting is in-person at the meeting location published in the meeting agenda. However, there are alternative ways to observe and participate in the meeting:
• Watch on TV on Comcast channel 26
• Watch a Live Stream of the meeting by following https://www.cityofpacifica.org/LiveStream or www.pacificcoast.tv
• Call-In Public Comments (offered on a pilot basis):
• When the Mayor announces the Agenda Item on which you would like to comment, dial-in to the number and enter the Conference ID listed below. You will be placed on hold in a call-queue.
Please mute any background sound and listen through your phone to be called upon by the last 4-digits of your phone number. State your full name at the start of your public comment. • Dial-in: 1-650-898-6965 | Conference ID: 383 609 442 # o Press * 5 to raise your hand in the call queue.
o Press * 6 to unmute when called upon to speak by the last 4-digits of your phone #.
Please note that Alternative platforms for participation are subject to underlying technology functionality and may be modified or interrupted at any time without notice. • Written Public Comments:
BEFORE THE MEETING: Written public comments may be submitted in advance by 12:00 p.m. on the meeting date by email to: [email protected]. Written public comments submitted by email should adhere to the following:
• Clearly indicate the Agenda Item No. or specify “Oral Communications” in the Subject Line for items not on the agenda
• Include the submitter’s full name
Written public comments received by 12:00 p.m. on the meeting date will be provided in their entirety to the City Council and posted to the City’s website prior to the meeting but will not be read verbally at the meeting.
City Council Regular Meeting 2 January 23, 2023
AT THE MEETING: Materials in writing provided at the meeting should provide seven (7) copies to provide for each Councilmember, City Clerk and City staff. 4:30 PM - CLOSED SESSION
00a. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS - Government Code section 54957.6 - Agency designated representatives: Timothy Davis, Mark Wilson, Rachel Balchum of Burke, Williams, and Sorenson; Employee organizations: Fire Battalion Chiefs, IAFF Local 2400; Fire Fighters, IAFF Local 240; Management Unit, Teamsters Local 350 ; Miscellaneous Employee, Teamster Local 856; Pacifica Police Officers Association; Police Mgmnt (PPMA) & Police Supervisors (PPSA); Wastewater Treatment Plant Teamsters Local 856
5:30 PM - OPEN JOINT STUDY SESSION OF CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION Joint City Council and Planning Commission Study Session to hear a presentation and discuss the Pacifica Economic Opportunities Study report.
PROPOSED ACTION: Receive and discuss the Economic Opportunities Study report prepared by Kosmont Companies and provide direction on next steps for integrating and prioritizing the report’s findings and recommendations into the Pacifica Economic Development program.
ADJOURN JOINT STUDY SESSION
7:00 PM - OPEN SESSION - REGULAR MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL Call to Order
Roll Call
Reading of Land Acknowledgment
The City of Pacifica acknowledges that we occupy the unceded ancestral homeland of the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples, who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco Peninsula. We honor the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples for their enduring commitment to Mother Earth. As the Indigenous protectors of this land and in accordance with their traditions, the Ramaytush Ohlone have never ceded, lost, nor forgotten their responsibilities as the caretakers of this place, as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. We affirm their sovereign rights as First Peoples and wish to pay our respects to the ancestors, elders, and relatives of the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples.
Salute to the Flag led by Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus
Closed Session Report
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Proclamation - HumanTrafficking Prevention Month
City Council Regular Meeting 3 January 23, 2023
CONSENT CALENDAR
Persons wishing to address the Council on any Consent Calendar item may do so at this time. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes. Those wishing to address the Council on any item listed on the agenda should submit a speaker card to the City Clerk.
Items on the consent calendar will be adopted by one motion unless a Councilmember requests, before the vote on the motion, to have an item discussed. Time limit on comments is three minutes or less.
1. Approval of Disbursements for Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22.
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to approve attached lists of disbursements for 11/16/22 through 12/31/22.
2. Approval of Minutes
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to approve the minutes of the City Council Regular Meeting held on January 9, 2023.
3. Merge three (3) current separate PB&R Supervisor job specifications documents (Childcare, Food/Senior Services, and Recreation/Aquatics) into one (1) comprehensive Recreation Supervisor job specification document
PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a resolution to merge and update the job specifications for Parks, Beaches & Recreation Childcare Supervisor, Food/Senior Services Supervisor, and Recreation/Aquatics Supervisor, into one (1) job specification title document, Recreation Supervisor.
4. Adoption of Resolution Authorizing Investment of Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to adopt the resolution to update and replace authorized signers on the City of Pacifica's Local Agency Investment Fund through the State of California Treasury Department.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This portion of the Agenda is available for the public to address the City Council on any issue that is not on the Agenda. Any person wishing to address the Council shall be recognized by the Mayor during Oral Communications, provided, however, that during the Oral Communications portion of the agenda, only items not on the agenda for that meeting may be addressed. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body and not to any member thereof. Councilmembers shall not enter into debate with speakers under Oral Communications. A maximum time of three minutes will be allowed for any speaker. Pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code Title 2, Chapter 1, Section 2-1.118 any person making impertinent, slanderous, or profane remarks or who becomes boisterous while addressing the Council shall be called to order by the presiding officer and, if such conduct continues, may, at the direction of the presiding officer, be ordered barred from further audience before the Council during the meeting.
City Council Regular Meeting 4 January 23, 2023
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
The purpose of Council Communications is for Councilmembers to inform each other of items of potential interest to other Councilmembers, such as interagency meetings.
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
The purpose of Staff Communications is for the City Manager to offer announcements as appropriate.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE.
CONSIDERATION
5. Accept the City of Pacifica's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) and related financial reports for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 PROPOSED ACTION: Accept the City of Pacifica's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR), and other related financial reports for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022.
6. Updates to the City Council Rules and Code of Ethics PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt updates to the City Council Rules and Code of Ethics as recommended by the Council-appointed two Councilmember Ad Hoc Subcommittee, the City Manager, City Attorney, and City Clerk.
ADJOURN
NOTICE: If you challenge a city's zoning, planning or other decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Judicial review of any city administrative decision may be had only if a petition is filed with the court not later than the 90th day following the date upon which the decision becomes final. Judicial review of environmental determinations may be subject to a shorter time period for litigation, in certain cases 30 days following the date of the final decision The City of Pacifica will provide assistance for disabled citizens upon at least 24 hours advance notice to the City Manager’s Office (650) 738-7301, or send request via email to:
[email protected] if you need sign language assistance or written material printed in a larger font or taped, advance notice is necessary. All meeting rooms are accessible to the disabled.
The Pacifica Municipal Code is available online at the City’s website (www.cityofpacifica.org/municode);
HOW TO OBTAIN CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS
Posted agendas:
Agendas are posted no later than Friday prior to the City Council meeting date, at the entrance to the City Hall location at the Pacifica Community Center, 540 Crespi Drive.
View on the Internet:
Follow the link to Council agenda, at www.cityofpacifica.org E-mail subscription:
Send a request to Sarah Coffey, at [email protected] City Clerk’s Office/City Manager’s Office
City Hall, 540 Crespi Drive
City Council Regular Meeting 5 January 23, 2023
Council meetings:
Agendas are available at the City Council meeting
HOW TO REACH YOUR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
• Governor Gavin Newsom, State Capitol Building, Sacramento CA 95814 (916) 445-2841 • State Senator Josh Becker, 1528 So. El Camino Real, Suite 303, San Mateo CA 94402 (650) 212-3313 • Assembly Member Marc Berman, 721 Colorado Ave, Suite 101, Palo Alto CA 94303 (650) 324-0224 • Congresswoman Anna Eshoo, 698 Emerson Street, Palo Alto CA 94301 (650) 323-2984 • Senator Alex Padilla, B03 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington DC 20510 (202) 224-3553 • Senator Dianne Feinstein, #1 Post Street, Suite 2450, San Francisco CA 94104 (415) 393-0707 • President Joseph R. Biden, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington DC 20500
CITY COUNCIL
• Mayor Tygarjas Bigstyck, tbigstyck@ pacifica.gov
• Mayor pro Tem Sue Vaterlaus, [email protected]
• Councilmember Sue Beckmeyer, [email protected]
• Councilmember Mary Bier, [email protected]
• Councilmember Christine Boles, [email protected]
CITY OF PACIFICA
COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/23/2023
1 SUBJECT:
Joint City Council and Planning Commission Study Session to hear a presentation and discuss the Pacifica Economic Opportunities Study report.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Receive and discuss the Economic Opportunities Study report prepared by Kosmont Companies and provide direction on next steps for integrating and prioritizing the report’s findings and recommendations into the Pacifica Economic Development program.
STAFF CONTACT:
Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager
(650) 738-7409
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Yulia Carter, Assistant City Manager
(650) 501-6004
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
INTRODUCTION:
On October 12, 2020, the City Council adopted the Project Purpose Statement and Scope of Work for the Vision 2025 and Beyond Fiscal Sustainability Plan. A Council Study Session to further develop the Vision 2025 and Beyond Plan was held on December 13, 2021. At that meeting, the Council reviewed the results of a Marketing Study and Plan for the City of Pacifica and authorized a Request for Proposal (RFP) for an Economic Opportunities Study (EOS).
On April 25, 2022, the City Council Awarded a Contract to Kosmont Companies for the preparation of the EOS for the City of Pacifica with an estimated completion date of the study in December 2022. That work has been completed as scheduled and the EOS study is now ready for presentation to the City Council. In light of the land use recommendations included in the draft report, the Planning Commission has been invited to join the City Council in tonight’s presentation and discussion of the EOS report.
Tonight’s Council Study Session will include:
1. A presentation of the EOS Executive Summary by members of the Kosmont Companies team that developed the report.
2. Time for the City Council and Planning Commission members to delve into the full report with a representative of the Kosmont Team and to receive Public Comment.
3. An opportunity to provide initial input and direction to City Staff prior to the development of initial Economic Development priorities for follow up and implementation by the City Staff.
PACIFICA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITES STUDY (EOS)
The Pacifica Economic Opportunities Study is attached to this Council Report and includes a 10- page Executive Summary (Attachment 1) and a 173-page Final Study document (Attachment 2). The study is divided into 5 sections:
Packet Pg. 6
Pacifica City Council 2
January 23, 2023
1. Executive Summary (Attachment 1 and Attachment 2, pages 4-26) A 10-page letter to the City presented in Attachment 1 and Section 1 of the Draft Economic Opportunities Study (pages 4-26) presented in the Attachment 2. This includes the highlights and high-level summary of the study findings.
2. Economic and Land Use Trends (Attachment 2, pages 27-42) Section 2 in the Draft EOS (pages 27-42) discusses Economic and Land Use Trends in the Retail, Office, Industrial, Residential and Hospitality sectors. This includes discussions of the growth of Work From Home and eCommerce Sales, Essential and Experiential Retail and Blended Uses. It also includes Case Studies in California communities that illustrate these changes.
3. Business District Analysis (Attachment 2, pages 43-85) Section 3 (pages 43-85) provides maps and detailed SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analysis of each of Pacifica’s 5 Business Districts as outlined in the EOS Study RFP:
• Pacific Manor/Fairmont
• Sharp Park/Eureka Square
• Rockaway Beach/Vallemar
• Linda Mar/Sun Valley
• Pedro Point
Also included in this section are information on demographics, attractions, restaurants, sales tax trends, aerial photographs, visitor analytics including visitor home location, findings, and recommendations for each of the 5 business districts in Pacifica. This information will be helpful to both the City and local businesses in developing marketing and economic development programs in the future.
4. Opportunity Sites (Attachment 2, pages 86-104)
Section 4 (pages 86-104) provides a map and detailed discussion of 8 Opportunity Sites that were identified and explored by the Kosmont study team. These sites are as follows:
• 2212 Beach Boulevard Publicly Owned (City)
• Palmetto Avenue - 5 Parcels Privately Owned
• Quarry Site - Flat Area Privately Owned
• Sea Bowl - Parking Area Privately Owned
• Linda Mar Center - Surplus Parking Privately Owned
• Park Mall - 3 Parcels Privately & Publicly Owned (City) • SamTrans Park & Ride Publicly Owned (SamTrans)
• Community Center Property Publicly Owned (City)
For each of these sites, the draft study provides information on the size, ownership, surrounding uses and opportunities for each. The opportunities include potential uses such as Hotel, Retail, Commercial, Downtown Anchor, Community Center, Blended Use, Multifamily Residential, Open Space, Residential, High End Hospitality, Trailer Hotel, Food Court, Mixed Use and Public/Private Partnership.
5. Data Appendix (Attachment 2, pages 105-172)
Section 5 (pages 105-172) provides additional data and information on Pacifica. This includes demographics, market data, location analysis and revenue data.
Packet Pg. 7
Pacifica City Council 3
January 23, 2023
This section also provides the results of the Community and Stakeholder Outreach work done during the study. The City Staff and the Kosmont Team worked with a Council Community Outreach Subcommittee appointed by the City Council (Council Member Beckmeyer and former Council Member O’Neill) to develop the outreach process. This included:
• Community Workshop #1 - via Zoom - August 2022
• Online Survey of Pacifica Residents and Businesses - August & September 2022 • Stakeholder Outreach Meetings - August & September 2022 • Community Workshop # 2 - In Person - November 2022
ANALYSIS & ATTACHMENTS
During the review and analysis of the Final EOS Report by the City Staff, three additional attachments have been developed. They will facilitate the review and discussion of the EOS Report.
List of Economic Opportunities
Attachment 3 to this report is a comprehensive List of all Economic Opportunities that are identified and presented in the EOS. This is a table color-coded by business district with a brief description of each opportunity, the business district it applies to (or Citywide in some cases), and the page(s) that the recommendation appears on.
Opportunity Site Revenue Estimates
Attachment 4 lists the 8 Opportunity Sites described in the EOS along with a revenue estimate for each site from the report developed by the Kosmont Team. This attachment provides an overview of the revenue potential to the City outlined in the draft study.
Proposed Economic Opportunity Timing
Attachment 5 is a list of the 30 Economic Opportunities in the EOS report sorted by the projected potential implementation timeline of each opportunity. This list is an initial look at how the Staff believes these study objectives could be developed and implemented if approved by the City Council.
Staff recognizes that with 30 opportunities in the study, they will require time and resources to review, develop, and potentially implement. Our vision is that the opportunities could be explored and implemented in these categories:
• Short Term - 1 to 2 years
• Medium Term - 3 to 4 years
• Long Term - 5 years or longer
Staff looks forward to the Council’s comments on which opportunities are of interest and in what sequence and priority the Council may wish to see the desired opportunities move ahead.
NEXT STEPS
The implementation scope of the Economic Opportunities Study is yet to be determined, pending the City Council’s input on the opportunities outlined in the report. If the Council approves the recommendation to proceed with the development of initial Economic Development priorities from the EOS, this item will be returned to the City Council for further discussion and consideration at a Council meeting in early 2023.
RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:
The Economic Opportunities Study will advance the Vision 2025 & Beyond City Council Priority Packet Pg. 8
Pacifica City Council 4
January 23, 2023
Item # 4 - Economic Development Strategies and the City Council’s Strategic Plan goal of Fiscal Sustainability.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is an informational item. There is no immediate fiscal impact associated with the review of the EOS. Pursuing the Economic Opportunities outlined in the EOS Study document could require additional funding in the current and upcoming fiscal years. Implementing these opportunities could generate up to $1.45 Million to $2.75 Million per year in new revenues for the City in future years at the 8 Opportunity Sites outlined in the EOS (see Attachment 4) if approved by Council. Other recommendations in the EOS report could result in additional revenues for the City as well.
ORIGINATED BY:
City Manager's Office
ATTACHMENT LIST:
Attachment 1 - Executive Summary - Economic Opportunities Study (PDF) Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (PDF) Attachment 3 - List of Economic Opportunities (PDF)
Attachment 4 - Opportunity Site Revenue Estimates(PDF)
Attachment 5 - Economic Opportunity Timing List (PDF)
Packet Pg. 9
Kosmont Companies
Mailing Address: 1601 N. Sepulveda Blvd., #382 (424) 297-1070 Physical Address: 2301 Rosecrans Ave, Ste. 4140 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 www.kosmont.com El Segundo, CA 90245 January 17, 2023
Mr. Kevin Woodhouse
City Manager
City of Pacifica
540 Crespi Drive
Pacifica, CA 94044
Re: Economic Opportunities Study – Executive Summary
Dear Mr. Woodhouse:
Kosmont & Associates, Inc. doing business as Kosmont Companies (“Consultant” or “Kosmont”) is pleased to present this Executive Summary of the Economic Opportunities Study (“EOS”) for the five main business districts in the City of Pacifica (“City” or “Pacifica”): Pacific Manor / Fairmont, Sharp Park / Eureka Square, Rockaway Beach / Vallemar, Linda Mar / Sun Valley, and Pedro Point. The EOS is an important complement to the Vision 2025 & Beyond Plan to address economic sustainability for the City.
Given shifting consumer preferences and land uses, and uncertain economic times and fiscal challenges, it is important that Pacifica identify opportunities within the City’s business districts to spur select new development that can increase General Fund revenues.
The EOS identifies potential long term commercial opportunities that are supported by market forces and enhanced by steps the City and community can take. Environmental and other studies will be necessary next steps to implementation of potential projects at the City-owned Beach Boulevard site, Palmetto Ave., and privately-owned Quarry property, as examples.
Approach
Kosmont’s approach to preparing the EOS included the following tasks:
Review of City Budget and Planning documents, together with a daylong tour of the City and its business and residential districts
Interviews with City staff, Council members, and community stakeholders Assessment of regional economic trends
Assessment of local demographic and market conditions In person and virtual community outreach to gain insights as to needs and challenges and present preliminary findings
Detailed assessment of five major commercial districts Identification of key opportunity sites and recommended land uses a
Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Executive Summary - Economic Opportunities Study (5256 : Economic Opportunities Study) City of Pacifica
EOS Executive Summary
January 17, 2023
Kosmont Companies 2 | P a g e
(424) 297-1070
www.kosmont.com
Summary Findings
Pacifica is a unique coastal city with a variety of attractions, as well as multiple business districts.
The City’s commercial base is heavily weighted with grocery-anchored community centers with a limited number of hotel rooms and restaurants and no regional retail anchors, due to City’s broad geographic spread.
Commercial real estate rents and occupancy have been fairly stable over the past 10 years with little new development activity occurring in the City. Pacifica experiences a relatively high level of travel along Coast Highway with an estimated 10,700 cars (average daily traffic volume) passing the City southbound (~91% of those trips are from travelers who live outside Pacifica). Capturing a small percentage will significantly improve hotel and retail spending.
FogFest (4th weekend in September) is the premier tourist event drawing as many as 60,000 visitors over two days, with majority from outside of Pacifica. The 2022 event saw a 20% increase in visits over 2019 according to Placer.ai data. Pacifica has historically faced budget deficits, service reductions and inability to fund key projects. The City wants to identify opportunities that can spur economic sustainability and increase General Fund revenues.
The majority (67%) of City tax revenue comes from property taxes with only ~10% coming from sales taxes and 7% from hotel transient occupancy taxes (TOT) (much lower than statewide and oceanfront community averages). While the newly approved Measure Y will add a half-cent local sales tax (estimated to generate ~$2.6 million annually) to help address the City’s structural deficit, the City should still develop strategies to generate additional tax revenues.
Market Overview
The Pacifica regional retail market has seen limited new construction in the past 10 years, partially due to stable population. The City has captured ~33% of the regional supply in the local Peninsula Coastline submarket. Rents are relatively affordable, compared to most of the nearby submarkets in the San Francisco metro area. The regional office market has grown less than one percent over the past decade, with Pacifica seeing ~26% of demand in the Peninsula Coastline submarket. Office inventory has contracted over the past few years due to demolition activity and no new projects under construction. Rents are substantially below metro averages, with little rent growth in recent years.
a
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Executive Summary - Economic Opportunities Study (5256 : Economic Opportunities Study) City of Pacifica
EOS Executive Summary
January 17, 2023
Kosmont Companies 3 | P a g e
(424) 297-1070
www.kosmont.com
The multi-family residential market is generally strong in the area due to supply constraints, experiencing some volatility due to tech industry trends. Many renters left the urban areas of San Francisco during the pandemic, relocating to cheaper / suburban towns in the Bay Area; as San Francisco emerges from the pandemic, occupancy is above pre-pandemic levels.
The hotel market has started to rebound in the region; the City has seen some new developments in recent years, and could be in a good position for future developments due to its scenic coastal location and close proximity to the Bay Area population centers.
Stakeholder / Community Comments
Kosmont conducted extensive stakeholder and community outreach with dozens of in persons interviews, a virtual town hall, a web-based survey and an in-person community meeting to present preliminary findings.
• Linda Mar / Sun Valley commercial area is the busiest district, followed by Sharp Park / Eureka Square
• Shopping for essentials (e.g., grocery / hardware) is the main reason residents shop in Pacifica
• Less than 20% of City residents frequent Pacifica arts / entertainment and leisure facilities
• Beautification of buildings, signage and more landscaping is desired • More outdoor activities/dining options are desired
Key themes as to types of new development residents want to see in Pacifica:
• 85% of residents want to see new dining options
• 70% want to see more gathering places
• 65% want to see more entertainment venues
• 60% want to see more arts/cultural event
• 50% want to see more housing options
Recommendations for Consideration
Kosmont has outlined a series of recommendations for the various districts, as well as citywide strategies.
Citywide Strategies
Improve Economic Health of City Businesses
• Utilize Business Matters newsletter to promote digital marketing education / social media training and financial assistance for small businesses
• Recommend that the City work with San Francisco County to expand activities and promotion of the historic and beautiful Sharp Park Golf Course • Install EV charging facilities in shopping districts to attract tourists for lunch or dinner a
Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Executive Summary - Economic Opportunities Study (5256 : Economic Opportunities Study) City of Pacifica
EOS Executive Summary
January 17, 2023
Kosmont Companies 4 | P a g e
(424) 297-1070
www.kosmont.com
• Chamber could provide hotels with monthly Pacifica Anchor and Coastside magazines • Staff to act as City ambassadors with local property/business owners – How do we get to a “Yes”
• Coordinate regional marketing with Half Moon Bay
• Promote events in various districts (i.e., Sam’s Castle, Sanchez Adobe, Sanchez Art Center)
• Electric bicycle rental facility is suggested for Sharp Park or Rockaway to help tourists Transform Sharp Park / Palmetto Ave. into a “downtown”
• Promote more events on Palmetto Ave. (e.g., food trucks) to encourage tourists and resident visitors to stay longer
• Social events for cannabis customers will bring visitors from large region • Sharp Park Golf Course could be promoted as it is historic and a beautiful resource • Consider July 4th fireworks off of Pier – coordinate with local businesses to create daylong events along Palmetto Ave.
• Beach Blvd. site could be activated with commercial or blended uses District & Opportunity Site Recommendations
Pacific Manor / Fairmont District
There were no significant development sites found in the Pacific Manor or Fairmont neighborhood, but Kosmont recommends City investment in upgrading the signage and appearance of the Safeway anchored center.
Next Steps:
• City to work with the Manor shopping center owners to encourage rehabilitation and/or renovation of center signage and store front façades
• Work with State to add Highway 1 signage announcing Pacifica Business district Sharp Park / Eureka Square District
There are several sites suitable for development within the Palmetto Ave corridor:
1. Beach Blvd 3.5 acre former wastewater treatment site
2. Five Palmetto Ave. parcels – from 0.11 to 0.36 acres each Beach Blvd. Site
As an oceanfront community approximately 10 miles south of San Francisco, there is strong demand for hotels with proper marketing and facilities available. However, Pacifica has limited hospitality facilities, especially compared to Half Moon Bay. The City has envisioned this site as a future hotel/commercial/mixed use site. An RFP was issued in late 2019, but it was withdrawn after Covid pandemic hit.
a
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Executive Summary - Economic Opportunities Study (5256 : Economic Opportunities Study) City of Pacifica
EOS Executive Summary
January 17, 2023
Kosmont Companies 5 | P a g e
(424) 297-1070
www.kosmont.com
Background
The City owns a 3.5 acre former wastewater treatment ocean front site on Beach Blvd. in the heart of the Sharp Park district near the Pacifica Pier. According to the Sharp Park Specific Plan the height limit is 55 feet, which makes it well suited for hotel or residential use over ground floor commercial.
Next Steps
• Determine if hotel and complimentary uses are still desired • If private development is desired, then Surplus Land Act (SLA) process must be initiated to promote the site to potential affordable housing developers throughout the State via Housing & Community Development.
• If affordable housing developers are not interested or unable to reach agreement with City, then reissue RFQ/P for private development.
• Consider leasing the site to provide long term revenue source Economic Benefits
A moderate sized select service hotel development on half of the site could yield +$500,000 in annual tax revenues to City, while a residential development of 50-60 units on remaining half would add +$30 million in assessed value and bring $1 million in new resident spending. This could yield +$150,000 in annual tax revenue to City.
Palmetto Ave. Sites
The recently adopted Sharp Park Specific Plan is designed to provide a town center for Pacifica and complete neighborhood for future residents. There are several vacant Palmetto Ave. parcels – from 0.11 to 0.36 acres each totaling approximately 1 acre that are privately owned and can be developed with moderate density mixed-use according to Specific Plan.
Palmetto Ave. is the backbone of the neighborhood with mix of uses to attract visitors and allow them to linger. Strong housing demand makes this is an excellent opportunity.
Background
Palmetto Ave is the main street in the Sharp Park neighborhood. Historically this has been a heavily residential area. In addition to the new Specific plan, the City has recently completed ½ mile for bicycle and pedestrian improvements to increase mobility.
Next Steps
• Educate property owners on the benefits of the Specific Plan • Consider developing public parking lots to accommodate more visitors a
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Executive Summary - Economic Opportunities Study (5256 : Economic Opportunities Study) City of Pacifica
EOS Executive Summary
January 17, 2023
Kosmont Companies 6 | P a g e
(424) 297-1070
www.kosmont.com
Economic Benefits
Blended use development of 30-40 units are possible on these parcels and could add +$30 million in assessed value and bring $1 million in new resident spending yielding up to $100,000 in City tax revenues, in addition new residents would bring important daytime activity to the street.
Rockaway Beach / Vallemar District
There are two opportunity sites Kosmont identified:
1. Southern portion of the flat or Eastern parcel (approximately 20-acres) of the Quarry site is recommended as a major tourist serving facility. Housing could be an additional use to improve the economic feasibility of a potential project.
2. The parking lot of the Sea Bowl site could be considered for blended-use housing/commercial development.
Quarry Site
The most significant opportunity site for the City in located in Rockaway / Vallemar area.
Rockaway is the City’s hospitality center, but it lacks many amenities including high quality facilities and parking.
The southern portion of Quarry site is well suited for both residential and high end hospitality development to expand amenities for Rockaway as a major tourist location (See case study of unique hospitality concepts in Section 2 – Land Use Trends). The northern area may be designated for wetlands mitigation, while hillside areas comprising over half of the site would be preserved for open space and hiking trails.
Background
A former rock quarry, the privately owned site is strategically located between the Rockaway hotels, Pacific Ocean and Coast Highway. Development proposals have had extensive history of community opposition, especially housing development. 1983 Ordinance 391-c.s. was approved and rezoned the site to C-3 commercial, with a provision that requires a citywide public vote to approve any new housing.
Next Steps
• Initiate Specific plan process with ownership and encourage low density high-value visitor uses in conjunction with housing development.
Economic Benefits
Luxury hospitality development of 75-100 bungalows on Quarry site could add $50 million in AV and yield $500,000 to $1 million in TOT and sales tax, plus $50,000 in property taxes to the a
Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Executive Summary - Economic Opportunities Study (5256 : Economic Opportunities Study) City of Pacifica
EOS Executive Summary
January 17, 2023
Kosmont Companies 7 | P a g e
(424) 297-1070
www.kosmont.com
General Fund. Residential development could add $50 million in additional AV plus increase retail sales by $1-2 million, adding $100,000 in annual tax revenue to City.
Sea Bowl Parking Lot Site
Two popular entertainment venues, the 32-lane Sea Bowl and lounge and the 3,700 SF Pacifica Brewing Company are located on a 8.8-acre site.
Background
The existing buildings occupy approximately 40,000 square feet for a floor area ratio (“FAR”) of
0.1. With such low density, 1/3rd of the parking lot (approximately +2 acres) could be reconfigured for medium to high density blended-use providing up to 100 multifamily units and 5,000 SF of additional commercial, or alternatively add 15,000 to 20,000 SF of additional restaurant/entertainment.
Next Steps
City and property owners need to examine potential rezoning of the site.
Economic Benefits
A blended use development of 80-100 units would add +$50 million in assessed value and bring $2 million in retail sales from new resident spending. This could yield +$200,000 in annual tax revenue to City, in addition to retaining these important retail/entertainment venues.
Linda Mar / Sun Valley District
There are four sites suitable for development within the Linda Mar / Sun Valley:
1. The surplus parking area behind Safeway
2. Park Mall adjacent parcels are lower priority
3. The SamTrans park & ride lot is in high value location
4. The Community Center at 540 Crespi is a high value property Linda Mar Center Parking Lot Site
A priority opportunity site within Linda Mar / Sun Valley is the surplus ~2 acre parking area behind Safeway. Kosmont recommends it be considered for high density blended use residential / commercial uses.
Background
This site provides overflow parking for the shopping center, per City code. It was identified in the most recent Housing Element as a site for new residential development. a
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Executive Summary - Economic Opportunities Study (5256 : Economic Opportunities Study) City of Pacifica
EOS Executive Summary
January 17, 2023
Kosmont Companies 8 | P a g e
(424) 297-1070
www.kosmont.com
Next Steps
• Discuss blended-use development options for surplus parking area behind Safeway with owner of shopping Center (Kimco)
• City / Kimco to analyze potential for parking variance at Linda Mar Center Economic Benefits
A blended use development of 60-80 units would add +$40 million in assessed value and bring $1-2 million in new resident spending. This development could yield +$150,000 in annual tax revenue to City.
Park Mall Sites
Park Mall is small community center in the eastern section of Linda Mar.
Background
There are several vacant parcels surrounding the center, including the Sanchez Park. The Sanchez Library is to be retained as part of the City library master plan.
Next Steps
• Analyze need for undeveloped City-owned land adjacent to Sanchez Library • Meet with private property owners at Park Mall to discuss development opportunities (both retail and multi-family)
Economic Benefits
Blended use development of 50-60 units would add +$30 million in assessed value and bring $1 million in new resident spending. This could yield +$100,000 in annual tax revenue to City.
SamTrans Park & Ride Lot Site
The SamTrans Park & Ride lot is an approximately 2-acre site in a high value location across from Linda Mar Center and the Coast Highway. Potential uses could be a “Steelcraft” container type food court, retail pads or “Airstream type” hospitality trailer park as discussed in Section II Land Use Trends.
Background
This site is owned by SamTrans, the regional transportation provider for use as Park & Ride lot for commuters to San Francisco area. The site does not appear to be heavily utilized. Given its excellent location, SamTrans may consider a public/private development opportunity. a
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Executive Summary - Economic Opportunities Study (5256 : Economic Opportunities Study) City of Pacifica
EOS Executive Summary
January 17, 2023
Kosmont Companies 9 | P a g e
(424) 297-1070
www.kosmont.com
Next Steps
• Open discussions with SamTrans to consider doing public private commercial development
• Determine new parking site for commuters (perhaps east side of Linda Mar Center) Economic Benefits
Commercial development could bring $100,000 to $250,000 per year in retail sales and/or TOT to the City General Fund.
Community Center Site
The Community Center and parking lot at 540 Crespi Drive are extremely valuable ocean frontage properties estimated at 5 acres in size. Ideally suited for commercial uses, in addition to the important community programs currently in operation.
Background
This facility is a former ATT switching facility that was acquired by City in 1986. It was converted into a Community Center in 1988 with a public parking lot owned by Cal Trans that serves the Center, as well as Linda Mar Beach visitors. The facility is currently housing City Hall while the facility is under construction in Sharp Park.
Next Steps
• Assess how much of the building area is needed for community services. • Potentially blend some limited commercial uses be accommodated in the building or parking areas as appropriate
Economic Benefits
Commercial development could bring up to $100,000 per year in retail sales to the City General Fund.
Pedro Point District
Pedro Point is the smallest district by geographic area and commercial square feet. The Pedro Point shopping center is successful, and no redevelopment opportunities were identified. Vacant land to the west has Coastal Commission and City restrictions impacting development potential. a
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Executive Summary - Economic Opportunities Study (5256 : Economic Opportunities Study) ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
FINAL VERSION
JANUARY 2023
CITY OF PACIFICA
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
Kosmont Companies
El Segundo, CA
b
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 2
CITY OF PACIFICA
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY
Kosmont Companies Staff Pacifica City Council Pacifica Staff & Advisory Ken K. Hira, President
Thomas Jirovsky, Senior Advisor
Robert Valenti, Vice President
Tygarjas Bigstyck, Councilmember / Mayor
Sue Vaterlaus, Councilmember / Mayor Pro Tempore
Sue Beckmeyer, Councilmember
Mary Bier, Councilmember
Christine Boles, Councilmember
Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager
Yulia Carter, Assistant City Manager
Christian Murdock, Planning Director
Lisa Petersen, Director of Public Works
Alyssa Barranti, Management Analyst
Brian Moura, Senior Advisor, RGS
b
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Executive Summary Page 4 – 26
2. Economic / Land Use Trends 27 – 42
3. Business District Analysis 43 – 85
Pacific Manor / Fairmont 49 – 57
Sharp Park / Eureka Square 58 – 63
Rockaway Beach / Vallemar 64 – 71
Linda Mar / Sun Valley 72 – 80
Pedro Point 81 – 86
4. Opportunity Sites 87 – 105
5. Data Appendix 106 - 174
Demographic / Market / Location Analytics / Revenue Data 106 – 160 Community & Stakeholder Outreach 161 – 173
b
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 4
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pacifica Economic Opportunities Study
b
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 5
PACIFICA
REGIONAL
CONTEXT
The City of Pacifica is a coastal
community located just south of San
Francisco / Daly City along the Pacific
Coast. The City is well positioned
along Coast Highway in close
proximity to downtown San
Francisco, Silicon Valley, and the
greater Bay Area.
b
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 6
BACKGROUND
Kosmont Companies (“Kosmont”) is pleased to present this Economic Opportunities Study (EOS) for the five main business districts in the City of Pacifica (“City” or “Pacifica”): Pacific Manor / Fairmont, Sharp Park / Eureka Square, Rockaway Beach / Vallemar, Linda Mar / Sun Valley, and Pedro Point. The EOS report is an important complement to the Vision 2025 & Beyond Plan to address economic sustainability for the City.
Given shifting consumer preferences and land uses, and uncertain economic times and fiscal challenges, it is important that Pacifica identify opportunities within the City’s business districts to spur select new development that can increase General Fund revenues.
The EOS identifies long term commercial opportunities supported by market forces and enhanced by steps the City and community can take. Environmental and other studies will be necessary important next steps to implementation of potential projects at the City-owned Beach Boulevard site, Palmetto Ave. and privately-owned Quarry property, as examples.
b
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 7
APPROACH
Kosmont’s approach to preparing the Economic Opportunities Study included the following tasks:
Review of City Budget and Planning documents, together with a daylong tour of the City and its business and residential districts
Interviews with City staff, Council members, and community stakeholders Assessment of regional economic trends
Assessment of local demographic and market conditions In person and virtual community outreach to gain insights as to needs and challenges and present preliminary findings
Detailed assessment of five major commercial districts Identification of key opportunity sites and recommended land uses b
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City retained Kosmont to prepare the Economic Opportunities Study to supplement the 2025 & Beyond Plan and assist in the preparation of updated zoning and new land use policies for future Specific Plans.
Today’s consumers are using online websites for purchasing a broad array of goods. Current economic forces require new approaches to land use that explore concepts for public amenities and private attractions that help cities capture trips and thus “sales”. Younger consumers, with increased use of media and digital communication, seek gathering places with restaurants, entertainment venues and experiential retail, rather than simply a collection of traditional store fronts. Another important group is the creative class of professionals. This dynamic workforce is attracted to communities with clustered centers, which provide a sense of vitality, diversity, convenience and a mix of work, entertainment, services, arts and culture.
Kosmont is assisting the City in achieving its economic objective by providing a market analysis and recommendations for each district. The goal is to create a compelling experience for commercial uses and foster a sense of community to which people are drawn. b
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 9
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pacifica is a unique coastal city with a variety of attractions, as well as multiple business districts. The City’s commercial base is heavily weighted with grocery-anchored community centers with a limited number of hotel rooms and restaurants and no regional retail anchors, due to City’s broad geographic spread.
Commercial real estate rents and occupancy have been fairly stable over the past 10 years with little new development activity occurring in the City.
Pacifica experiences a relatively high level of travel along Coast Highway with an estimated 10,700 cars (average daily traffic volume) passing the City southbound (~91% of those trips are from travelers who live outside Pacifica). Capturing a small percentage will significantly improve hotel and retail spending. FogFest (4th weekend in September) is the premier tourist event drawing as many as 60,000 visitors with approximately 80% outside of Pacifica. The 2022 event saw an estimated 20% increase in visits over 2019 according to Placer.ai data.
b
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 10
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
FY2023 Budget
Property Taxes $ 15,181,300
Property Tax: VLF 5,922,400
Sales Tax
(Bradley Burns 1%) 3,111,200
Cannabis Tax 825,000
Transient Occupancy Tax 2,100,000
Utility Users Tax 1,905,600
Business License Tax 516,600
Other Taxes 1,687,800
Total 31,249,900
Pacifica has historically faced budget deficits, service reductions and inability to fund key projects. The City wants to identify opportunities that can spur economic development and increase revenues.
The majority (67%) of City tax revenue comes from property taxes with only ~10% coming from sales taxes and 7% from hotel transient occupancy taxes (TOT) (much lower than statewide and oceanfront community averages).
While the newly approved Measure Y will add a half-cent local sales tax (estimated to generate ~$2.6 million annually) to help address the City’s structural deficit, the City should still develop strategies to generate additional tax revenues.
b
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 11
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
While property taxes are the major revenue source, the tax revenue has grown at only a 4% compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”)
Over the past decade Pacifica has seen sales tax growth of 7.2% - despite a 13% drop during the first year of pandemic.
It is worth noting that Half Moon Bay and San Mateo County had sharper decline in sales during Covid Growth in internet sales across the State – and resulting County Pool distributions - is responsible for dominant share of tax growth in Pacifica.
Actual onsite sales in Pacifica business has seen little or no growth since 2012 City owns Beach Blvd. site that can be developed under unsubordinated ground lease, yielding inflation protected revenue sources, while retaining ownership.
See chart on following page and Appendix C for more detailed info b
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 12
SALES TAX BY MAJOR INDUSTRY GROUP
EXCLUDES COUNTY POOL – INTERNET SALES
FY 2022 %
Restaurants And
Hotels
$ 533,753 32%
Food And Drugs 435,707 26%
Fuel And Service
Stations 319,643 19%
General Consumer
Goods 212,915 13%
Autos And
Transportation
71,429 4%
Building And
Construction 70,940 4%
Business And Industry 20,982 1%
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Restaurants And Hotels Food And Drugs Fuel And Service Stations General Consumer Goods Autos And Transportation Building And Construction Business And Industry
Source: Total Point of Sale by Major Industry Group, City of Pacifica, HdL b
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 13
MARKET OVERVIEW
The Pacifica regional retail market has seen limited new construction in the past 10 years, partially due to stable population. The City has captured ~33% of the regional supply in the local Peninsula Coastline submarket. Rents are relatively affordable, compared to most of the nearby submarkets in the San Francisco metro area. The regional office market has grown less than one percent over the past decade, with Pacifica seeing ~26% of demand in the Peninsula Coastline submarket. Office inventory has contracted over the past few years due to demolition activity and no new projects under construction. Rents are substantially below metro averages, with little rent growth in recent years. The multi-family residential market is generally strong in the area due to supply constraints, experiencing some volatility due to tech industry trends. Many renters left the urban areas of San Francisco during the pandemic, relocating to cheaper / suburban towns in the Bay Area; as San Francisco emerges from the pandemic, occupancy is above pre-pandemic levels.
The hotel market has started to rebound in the region; the City has seen some new developments in recent years, and could be in a good position for future developments due to its scenic coastal location and close proximity to the Bay Area population centers.
Source: CoStar
b
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 14
ILLUSTRATIVE FISCAL IMPACT OF NEW DEVELOPMENT
To evaluate Pacifica economic opportunities and understand their impact on City revenues, the table below provides an illustration of incremental tax revenues potentially generated from various types of development on a typical 1-acre parcel:
10,000 SF
Commercial
Services
10,000 SF
Retail
10,000 SF
Restaurant
50-unit
Multifamily
Housing
Mixed Use
40-units &
5,000 SF
60-room
Upscale Hotel
Property Taxes +
VLF in-lieu $10,000 $10,000 $15,000 $65,000 $55,000 $50,000 Direct Sales & Use
Taxes $25,000 $50,000 $75,000 $25,000
Indirect Sales & Use
Taxes $20,000 $15,000 $35,000
Hotel
TOT $300,000
Annual General
Fund Revenues $35,000 $60,000 $90,000 $85,000 $95,000 $385,000 b
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 15
STAKEHOLDER / COMMUNITY COMMENTS
Kosmont conducted extensive stakeholder and community outreach with dozens of in persons interviews, a virtual town hall, a web-based survey and an in-person community meeting to present preliminary findings. • Linda Mar / Sun Valley commercial area is the busiest district, followed by Sharp Park / Eureka Square • Shopping for essentials (e.g., grocery / hardware) is the main reason residents shop in Pacifica • Less than 20% of City residents frequent Pacifica arts / entertainment and leisure facilities • Beautification of buildings, signage and more landscaping is desired • More outdoor activities/dining options are desired
Key themes as to types of new development residents want to see in Pacifica:
• 85% of residents want to see new dining options
• 70% want to see more gathering places
• 65% want to see more entertainment venues
• 60% want to see more arts/cultural events
• 50% want to see more housing options
b
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 16
SURVEY RESULTS
NEW DEVELOPMENT,
IMPROVEMENTS, AND
AMENITIES
43%
30%
21%
22%
21%
27%
9%
8%
4%
5%
12%
42%
34%
44%
46%
41%
26%
32%
24%
33%
29%
22%
11%
29%
32%
25%
31%
25%
44%
52%
44%
49%
37%
4%
7%
3%
7%
7%
23%
15%
15%
19%
16%
30%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Restaurants and dining options
Leisure and entertainment uses / venues
Shopping and other retailers
Places where people can gather (small / large groups)
Arts / cultural / educational
Housing options
Fitness / health / wellness
Personal services
Office (e.g. medical/professional/other)
Professional services
Hotel / hospitality
What type of new additional businesses / developments would you like to see in the business districts?
Extremely Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important at all 51%
45%
51%
30%
28%
30%
23%
21%
35%
38%
30%
43%
42%
36%
32%
34%
13%
15%
16%
21%
27%
30%
36%
34%
1%
2%
3%
6%
4%
4%
9%
11%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Mobility / walkability / bike - ability / transit
Safety
Traffic flow
Public art plazas, and walkways
Signage / wayfinding / lighting
Streetscape / design /built environment
Technological infrastructure
Parking infrastructure
Which improvements/amenities should the City focus on in the business districts?
Extremely Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important at all Respondents tend to value adding
new restaurant / dining options,
leisure / entertainment venues, and
places where people can gather to
the business districts. Adding
housing was important to over 50%
of respondents.
See Appendix D for additional
survey results.
b
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 17
PACIFICA HIGHLIGHTS AND ATTRACTIONS
The City’s cliffs and Pacific Ocean coastline are a scenic setting for hiking, biking, surfing, fishing, and sightseeing. Pacifica is home to a variety of historic and cultural attractions, including Sanchez Adobe, Sam’s Castle,
Pacifica Pier, and Sharp Park Golf Course.
The City is also home to a variety of restaurants,
breweries, and wine bars, bringing local flavor and activity to its business districts.
Potential for walkable communities with restaurants and other attractions within close proximity of each other, serves as an amenity for residents and visitors and
supports vibrant commercial districts.
b
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 18
SWOT ANALYSIS – STRENGTHS
Pacifica has many strengths that the City and business community can promote to increase tourism and other commercial activity in the City:
• Sharp Park Specific Plan
• San Francisco and Half Moon Bay adjacency
• Coast / hiking access
• Sharp Park Golf Course
• Municipal Pier
• Fog Festival
• Sanchez Adobe Historic Museum
• Sam’s Castle
• Sanchez Arts Center
Linda Mar Beach
Sharp Park Golf course
b
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 19
SWOT ANALYSIS – WEAKNESSES
There are several challenges the City can address:
• Coast Highway traffic jams at Sharp Park / Rockaway Beach limits residents from shopping on weekends
• Major infrastructure deficiencies – ranked the Bay Area’s worst roads, sites face infrastructure challenges that may add development costs • Poor commercial signage, lack of freeway signage to identify business districts
• Some residents are over-protective of “small town feel”, conflate “small town feel” with “no new development”
• Trade area population does not support larger retailers that residents desire ( i.e. Trader Joe’s)
• Poor transit service to San Francisco and San Mateo County • Permitting process has been problematic (primarily with contract staff) according to a few business owners
b
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 20
SWOT ANALYSIS – OPPORTUNITIES
From stakeholder and community outreach, Kosmont has identified many opportunities:
• Capture share of 10,000 daily tourists traveling past / through City • More events on Palmetto Ave. (e.g., food trucks) to support businesses • Promote new hotels / upgrade Lighthouse Hotel facility • Utilize Business Matters newsletter to promote digital marketing education / social media training and financial assistance for small businesses • Install EV charging facilities in shopping districts to attract tourists for lunch or dinner • Social events for cannabis customers will bring visitors from large region • Sharp Park Golf Course could be promoted as it is historic and a beautiful resource • Quarry property is the key economic development opportunity to expand Rockaway destination
• Chamber could provide hotels with monthly Pacifica Anchor and Coastside magazines • RHNA requirement for ~1,900 housing units translates into millions of dollars in assessed value and spending
Quarry Site
b
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 21
SWOT ANALYSIS – THREATS
There are many threats to attracting new development to Pacifica in the near term:
• Surplus Land Act (“SLA”) restricts City’s ability to sell or lease land for new commercial and market rate residential development (see discussion in Chapter 4)
• Half Moon Bay continues to capture vast majority of regional tourism
• Coastal Commission permitting uncertainty on land west of Hwy 1 • Sea level rise and Coastal erosion impacts new development in Rockaway and near Manor
• Wastewater treatment plant expansion may be needed to support significant new project development
• Macroeconomic environment (inflation, high construction costs, high interest rates) increases the risk of ground-up development Nick’s restaurant beach erosion
b
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 22
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OBSERVATIONS
Pacific Manor /
Fairmont
Gateway to City from the north; large concentration of retail and residential; two main shopping centers, largest sales tax generating district; challenges with signage, vacancy, landowner coordination Sharp Park /
Eureka Square
Specific Plan - Palmetto Ave. identified as desired location for “downtown” Pacifica, some vacant parcels in area; Upgraded façade at Eureka Square improves shopping center environment
Rockaway
Beach /
Vallemar
Main tourism center, district has largest concentration of hotel rooms and restaurants, but limited parking facilities; multiple landowners; could use an e-bicycle rental facility
Linda Mar /
Sun Valley
Gateway to City from the south; Linda Mar Center is professionally management / institutional ownership; District has largest concentration of retail and residential
Pedro Point Poor access with entrance located off Coast Highway; Vibrant retail center with Grocery Outlet rehab and new fitness center b
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 23
DISTRICT OPPORTUNITY SITES *
* DETAILED SITE INFO IN CHAPTER 4
Pacific Manor /
Fairmont
No undeveloped sites
Shopping center refurbishment needed at Pacific Manor
Sharp Park /
Eureka Square
Beach Blvd. site well suited for hotel / commercial development Other vacant parcels on Palmetto Ave. suited for potential blended-use residential over retail development
Rockaway
Beach /
Vallemar
Quarry site is a strong development opportunity site for expansion of important tourism facilities. Sea Bowl parking has potential for higher density blended-use
Linda Mar /
Sun Valley
Linda Mar Center surplus parking can be potential residential / mixed-use development; Park Mall – vacant commercial parcels and library site; SamTrans Park and Ride could be relocated for higher use on site Pedro Point No suitable sites available for commercial development; Shopping center tenants are performing well
b
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 24
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONSIDERATION
CITYWIDE STRATEGIES
Improve Economic Health of City Businesses
Utilize Business Matters newsletter to promote digital marketing education / social media training and financial assistance for small businesses
Install EV charging facilities in shopping districts to attract tourists for lunch or dinner Chamber could provide hotels with monthly Pacifica Anchor and Coastside magazines Staff to act as City ambassadors with local property/business owners – How do we get to a “Yes” on permitting issues? Coordinate regional marketing with Half Moon Bay
Promote events in various districts (i.e., Sam’s Castle, Sanchez Adobe, Sanchez Art Center ) Create “Downtown” District
Transform Palmetto Ave. in Sharp Park into a downtown district Promote more events on Palmetto Ave. (e.g., food trucks) to encourage tourists and resident visitors to stay longer Social events for cannabis customers will bring visitors from large region Sharp Park Golf Course could be promoted as it is historic and a beautiful resource Consider July 4th fireworks off Pier – coordinate with local businesses to create daylong events along Palmetto Ave. Beach Blvd. opportunity site could be activated with commercial or community uses E-bicycle rental center would be good draw for visitors b
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 25
DISTRICT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONSIDERATION
Pacific Manor / Fairmont Sharp Park / Eureka Square Rockaway Beach / Vallemar There were no significant development
sites found in the Pacific Manor or
Fairmont neighborhood, but Kosmont
recommends upgrading the signage and
appearance of the Safeway anchored
center.
There are several sites suitable for development
within the Palmetto Ave. corridor to create a
downtown district:
• Beach Blvd 3.5 acre former wastewater
treatment site
• Five Palmetto Ave. parcels – from 0.11 to
0.36 acres each
There are two opportunity sites Kosmont identified:
• The flat 20-acre portion of Quarry site is
recommended to be considered for high-end
hospitality development to expand amenities for
Rockaway as a major tourist location
• The parking lot of the Sea Bowl site may be
considered for medium to high density blendeduse housing/commercial Next Steps:
• City should work with the Manor
shopping center owners to encourage
rehabilitation and/or renovation of
center signage and store front façade
• Work with State to add Coast
Highway signage announcing Pacifica
Business district
Next Steps:
• Discuss benefits of the recently adopted
Specific Plan with property owners
• Recommend that the City work with City
and County of San Francisco to expand
activities and promotion of the historic and
beautiful Sharp Park Golf Course
• City needs go through the State HCD’s
Surplus Land Act to clear Beach Blvd. site
for development opportunities
Next Steps:
• Work with ownership to upgrade Lighthouse
Hotel facility
• Initiate Specific plan process with ownership /
encourage low density visitor serving uses along
with residential uses
b
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 26
DISTRICT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONSIDERATION
Linda Mar / Sun Valley Pedro Point
There are four opportunity sites Kosmont identified:
• The surplus parking area behind Safeway is recommended to be considered for high density blended use residential / commercial or replacement site for Park & Ride lot
• The SamTrans park & ride lot is in high value location • The Community Center and parking lot at 540 Crespi are high value properties • Park Mall / Sanchez Library undeveloped parcels are lower priority sites Pedro Point is the smallest district by geographic area and commercial SF. The Pedro Point shopping center is
successful, and no redevelopment opportunities were
identified. Vacant land to the west has Coastal Commission and City restrictions impacting development potential.
Next Steps:
• Open discussions with SamTrans to create commercial development site on the Park & Ride lot across from Linda Mar Shopping Center
• Analyze commercial opportunities for Community Center site across from Linda Mar Beach. How much building area is available for commercial uses? • Discuss residential blended-use development options for surplus parking area behind Safeway with owner of Linda Mar shopping Center (Kimco) Next Steps:
• Kosmont has no specific recommendations relative to
Pedro Point
b
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 27
2. ECONOMIC / LAND USE TRENDS
Pacifica Economic Opportunities Study
b
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 28
ECONOMIC AND LAND USE TRENDS
➢ Retail
• Retail store closures, bankruptcies, and ecommerce has changed economics of retail centers. Many are being reimagined (e.g,
blended use)
• Retail is driven by trip-generators such as
entertainment, experience, and essentials
➢ Office
• Downtown S.F. office building vacancy rising as
remote work becomes new normal; Social
distancing leads to offices resizing/reconfiguring
• Corporations see possible shift to suburban
offices - Integrating office in blended use
environments;
➢ Industrial
• E-commerce growth has exploded
• Retail and industrial are merging, with space
being used for Buy Online Pick Up in Store
(BOPIS), fulfillment, last mile and warehousing
➢ Residential
• Homes are live, play, and work environments
• Strength in suburban markets; Home office is
the new amenity, Apartment developments are
being designed to facilitate work
• New residential sites in shopping centers
➢ Hospitality
• Hospitality sector hurt the most by Covid-19,
but leisure travel is rebounding
b
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 29
Housing is Not a
Loss Leader, it’s a
Growth Driver
Retail is Not Just
Retail Anymore
Telework is
Reconfiguring Office
Industrial /
Distribution is
Critical for Your
Economy
Housing Creation as
Economic Development
Retail Reimagination as
Economic Development
Office Conversions as
Economic Development
Industrial & Fulfillment as
Economic Development
• New housing can generate
significant new tax revenues and
support local jobs
• Housing is not necessarily a net
negative fiscal impact, especially
at current property values
• U.S. retail over-built and needs
“right sizing;” Covid accelerated
trends; today its about essentials,
experience & e-commerce
• Blended/mixed use projects
integrate multiple uses (housing,
retail, open space, creative office,
hotel)
• Telework and work from home
options are reshaping the needs
for office space and business
districts
• Job redistribution tied to housing
• Vacancies can lead to fiscal
impact pressure
• Modern industrial is not “your
father’s industrial” – not
smokestacks
• Retail can’t thrive without
distribution
• Booming demand for
distribution, e-commerce, and
data centers, blending for
fulfillment/delivery, job creators
b
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 30
WORK-FROM-HOME GROWTH
Work-from-home is changing where people choose to live, and increases popularity of “15-minute communities” that offer amenities and quality of life.
Census Bureau estimated that ~44% of workers are in jobs where working from home is currently feasible, with only a quarter of those in feasible telework jobs actually utilizing this capability. Research shows the ability to telework likely varies by educational attainment and income-level; many of the telework occupations are Management / Business / Financial / Professional occupations. Opportunity for Pacifica new residential units. Other research shows that work-from-home represent ~30% of days, significantly above pre-pandemic estimates of 5%. Employers are expecting an average of 2.3 work-from-home days per week, suggesting that hybrid home/office model is likely to be well-utilized post-Covid.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; St. Louis Federal Reserve; Survey of Working Arrangements
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0 0.5
1 1.5
2 2.5
3 3.5
4 4.5
5 Percent Paid Full Days WFH
Employer Plans for Post-Covid WFH Days
Work-from-Home: Current Utilization and
Employer Plans for post-Covid
Employer Plans for Post-COVID WFH Days
Percentage of Days WFH
b
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 31
E-COMMERCE GROWTH
E-commerce sales in the U.S. have increased steadily, jumping by 30% to $800 billion annually by Q2 2020
due to increased utilization during the Covid-19
pandemic. This put additional pressure on local brickand-mortar retailers. Post pandemic retail mall shopping has recovered somewhat.
According to UBS, e-commerce’s share of overall U.S.
retail sales will continue to increase over the next 5
years, resulting in a loss of brick-and-mortar sales,
primarily in clothing, office supply and sporting goods. Consumer online shopping behavior has further
solidified during the Covid-19 pandemic, and is not
likely to revert to old patterns, thanks to free 1-day
delivery services, etc.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; St. Louis Federal Reserve; UBS 0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
16 0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020
E-Commerce Share of Total Retail Sales
(Percent)
E-Commerce Retail Sales
(Billions of Dollars)
E-Commerce Retail Sales
E-Commerce Sales
E-Commerce: Share of Total Retail Sales
b
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 32
RETAIL TRENDS
Shopping centers across the U.S. are faced with dramatic decline in retail sales as the digital economy converts the lifestyles and social patterns of every generation. Today’s consumers use online websites for purchasing many hard and soft good commodities.
Several hundred regional malls have closed in past 5-10 years. By 2025, experts expect only Class-A malls in high income communities are most likely to survive.
The impacts from e-commerce will have major impacts on large shopping centers in the region, particularly power centers. Pacifica is in relatively good position as community retail centers with the strongest opportunity for future growth are those focused on essentials and experiences. Shopping districts that are centered around experiences, entertainment, and essentials are best poised for economic resiliency and future success.
The future for retail centers in Pacifica lies in fostering experiential, entertainment uses and restaurants.
Blended use projects that bring additional uses to retail sites (such as hospitality, last-mile logistics, and multifamily residential) can bring more customers to the stores and thus be a more sustainable and diversified development that serves the community.
b
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 33
Retail It’s About Innovation
Convenience
It’s About
Experience
It’s About
Blended Use
b
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 34
WHAT DRIVES AN ENGAGING RETAIL EXPERIENCE?
Thoughtful
Design
Programmed
Outdoor Space
Communal
Elements
Unique
Amenities
Unique Food
Offerings
Curated Retail
Tenants
• Feels like an
exciting
destination
• Celebrates local
character
• Fosters a
specific
vibe/feeling
• Feels fresh and
innovative
• Fun and
welcoming
environment to
gather and hang
• Fresh air
elevates dining
and shopping
experience
• Mood lighting
and aesthetics
lifts the
ambiance
• Shared
community
experiences
• Encourage
conversation
and connection
• Examples:
breweries,
distilleries,
coffee / tea
• Unexpected
entertainment
attracts and
retains
customers
• Memorable and
engaging
• Examples –
arcade games,
photo booths,
lawn games, art
installations
• Interesting and
culturally rich
food options
• Reflects local
flavor, authentic,
interesting
fusion
• Exciting to try,
drives additional
visits
• Tenants and
pop-ups create a
reason to come
• Digital brands
with brick-andmortar spaces
• Curated
products that
create a
desirable
shopping
experience
• Local / exclusive
products
b
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 35
Stone Brewing Beer Garden Communal Outdoor Spaces
Rodeo39 Curated Retail & Food
Upscale Design Elements
ENGAGING RETAIL
EXAMPLES
Outdoor Amenities Steelcraft Curated Food
b
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 36
EXPERIENTIAL ENTERTAINMENT RETAIL CONCEPTS
Experiential retail / entertainment concepts have been merging food, drinks, and entertainment into engaging experiences. This includes:
Movie Theater concepts such as Alamo Drafthouse that deliver an improved theater experience with better seating / design and elevated food / beverage. Bowling concepts such as Bowlmor and Lucky Strike, which provide a more upscale experience in a lounge setting
Smaller format sports / activities concepts such as Puttshack, Spin Ping Pong, rock climbing gyms, ax throwing, escape rooms, laser tag, and trampoline parks. Larger format sporting / activities, including Topgolf and SFC sports facilities Personalized retail services, such as clothing and accessories stores that offer in-store services and customization
Interactive exhibits, including art galleries, installations, and other cultural offerings Gaming concepts such as arcade bars, pinball, virtual reality gaming, and e-sports b
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 37
Village Center / Rodeo 39 is an example of an experiential retail / housing blended use project that serves as an entertaining destination and hub for the community. It also demonstrates how adding residential can generate demand for retail on the site and add value to a project.
The Village Center shopping plaza in Stanton was a blighted 24-acre shopping site that had significant vacancy issues. The site’s retail component was rightsized down to 10-acres of the site, with a “town square” environment anchored by the Rodeo 39 curated public market. A new multifamily housing project was built on the remainder of the site.
Food and entertainment – particularly curated local offerings – was the foundation of the public market, a new 41,000 SF retail and dining space. Rodeo 39 has been a great success, with the local community embracing the eclectic destination.
The project also added a variety of entertaining and experiential offerings that encourage people to spend more time – a wide variety of cultural dining, small stage for live music performances, retro arcade / games, boutique tattoo artists, pop-up shops, and a variety of indoor and outdoor seating and gathering areas.
CASE STUDY
VILLAGE CENTER / RODEO 39
b
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 38
AERIAL PHOTO
VILLAGE CENTER / RODEO 39
Residential
Condos
Rodeo 39
Public Market Planet Fitness
Pad Restaurants
b
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 39
SteelCraft projects are good examples of experiential outdoor food halls built out of repurposed metal shipping containers that can activate a small site with relatively low capital costs. The containers are prepared for tenant improvements by insulating the walls, cutting windows, preserving structural integrity, and adding ventilation. The following projects have become well-loved destinations for both locals and visitors.
SteelCraft Long Beach was created from 10 repurposed shipping containers into an outdoor eatery, reactivating the corner of Long Beach Blvd and Bixby Rd with bright red containers, string lights, landscaping, and community-style seating. Tenants include craft food / deserts, beer / wine, and more. The 15,000 SF development was developed by Howard CDM in 2016.
SteelCraft Bellflower is comprised of 14 shipping containers that house 9 businesses – local craft foods / desserts, coffee shop, microbrewery / tap room, wine vendor, and communal dining areas. The project was developed on a 15,000 SF undeveloped parcel, at an estimated cost of $4.5 million.
SteelCraft Garden Grove is comprised of 22 shipping containers that host a variety of businesses, including local craft food / desserts, coffee, craft brewery / taproom, wine vendor, vintage video arcade, incubator office space, and communal dining areas. The site also includes a stage for live entertainment, shared table seating, and intimate spaces set in organic garden / citrus trees. The project was developed on a 1.9 AC site at an estimated cost of $5 million.
CASE STUDY - STEELCRAFT FOOD COURTS
b
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 40
CASE STUDY
UNIQUE HOTEL CONCEPTS IN NATURAL SETTING
There are several unique hospitality concepts Kosmont researched that may fit well in Pacifica:
• On 20+ acres of environmentally sensitive oceanfront lands in California, a “confidential” development has been proposed that is designed to provide low rise luxury bungalow accommodations together with fine dining and event space with public trails that connect to adjacent waterfront properties • On an Oregon waterfront site, a hospitality concept incorporated airstream trailers together with luxury bungalows and communal dining hall
• On a 2-acre infill parcel in Ojai, an Airstream trailer Village called Caravan Crossing was developed – transforming a blighted industrial property into an urban oasis with Airstream trailers that provide overnight accommodations
• On a +4-acre narrow site on Ventura waterfront-adjacent parcel, a similar concept was developed called Waypoint Ventura charging $175 per night for Airstream trailers in a communal setting b
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 41
LUXURY HOSPITALITY & RETAIL ON OCEANFRONT BLUFF
b
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 42
SMALL INFILL PARCEL – AIRSTREAM HOSPITALITY
b
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 43
3. BUSINESS DISTRICT ANALYSIS
Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study
b
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 44
PACIFICA
DISTRICTS
FIVE BUSINESS DISTRICT
AREAS WERE IDENTIFIED
FOR THE OPPORTUNITY
ANALYSIS
Boundaries based on
Pacifica Business District boundaries
Sources:
ESRI BAO Online, City of Pacifica
Pacific Manor / Fairmont
Sharp Park / Eureka Square
Rockaway Beach / Vallemar
Linda Mar /
Sun Valley
Pedro Point
b
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 45
DISTRICT DEMOGRAPHIC SUMMARY
Pacific Manor /
Fairmont
Sharp Park /
Eureka Square
Rockaway Beach /
Vallemar
Linda Mar /
Sun Valley Pedro Point Citywide
Population 14,600 4,600 3,400 15,000 900 38,500
Households 4,990 1,910 1,270 5,570 350 14,060
Avg HH Size 2.9 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.7
Median Age 40.7 43.7 46.5 46.8 47.4 43.9
Education: Bach Degree + 51% 55% 55% 47% 76% 51%
Median Household Income $146,500 $137,300 $160,300 $141,100 $200,000 $146,600 Average Household Income $181,200 $177,400 $220,500 $169,800 $285,400 $182,100 Median Home Value $1,024,600 $1,169,900 $1,211,400 $1,035,200 $1,348,400 $1,076,100 Owner Occupied Housing Units 64% 50% 85% 79% 68% 70%
Median Year Housing Unit Built 1967 1967 1961 1964 1966 1965 Median Year Moved into Unit 2010 2012 2003 2003 2010 2007 Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online
b
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 46
HIGHLIGHTS AND ATTRACTIONS
Pacifica is home to a variety of
historic and cultural attractions,
including:
• Sanchez Adobe, a living history
site occupied since prehistoric
indigenous times.
• Sam’s Castle, a castle built in 1908
with a storied history, filled with
works of art and antiques that is
available for special events.
• Pacifica Pier, attracting fisherman
and sightseers observing
humpback and gray whales.
b
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 47
HIGHLIGHTS AND ATTRACTIONS
Sharp Park Golf Course is a public
golf course that features incredible
views of the Pacific Ocean and
Pacifica’s cliffs. It is owned by the
City and County of San Francisco.
The course was designed by Alister
Mackenzie – a famous golf architect
who has designed courses across the
globe, including the Augusta National
Golf Club in Georgia and Cypress
Point Club in Carmel.
Source: VisitPacifica.com
b
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 48
A Grape in the Fog
Wine Bar, $$, 4.3
Nick's Restaurant
Seafood, $$, 3.7
Breakers
American, $$, 4
Oasis Vietnamese Cuisine
Vietnamese, $$, 3.9
Buona Italia Caffe
Italian, $$, 4.9
Pacifica Brewery
Brewery, $$, 3.9
Dinosaurs
Vietnamese, $$, 4.1
Pacifica Thai Cuisine
Thai, $$, 3.4
El Toro Loco
Mexican, $$, 3.9
Puerto 27 Peruvian Kitchen & Pisco Bar
Peruvian, $$$, 3.6
Gorilla Barbeque
Barbeque, $$, 3.9
Redeye Grill
Mediterranean, $$, 4.6
Grand HotPot
Hot Pot, $$, 4.1
Soul Rice
Chinese, $$, 4.7
High Tide
Creperie, Café, $$, 3.7
Table Wine
Wine, $$, 4.9
Humble Sea Brewing Company
Brewery, $$, 4
Taqueria La Perla
Mexican, $$, 4.1
Kenny's Café
Chinese, $$, 4.1
Taqueria Pacifica
Mexican, $$, 4.2
Kitten and Pinky
Vietnamese, $$, 4.6
Taqueria Pacifica
Mexican, $$, 4.2
La Playa
Mexican, $$, 3.2
The Green Enchilada
Mexican, $$, 3.8
Longboard Margarita Bar
Mexican, $$, 3.9
Top Pot
Hot Pot, $$$, 4.7
Lovey's Tea Shoppe
Tea Room, $$, 4.4
Uoyakutei Japanese Restaurant
Japanese, $$, 3.7
Moonraker Restaurant
Seafood, $$$, 3.8
Viva Italiano
Italian, $$, 3.1
PACIFICA
RESTAURANTS
Pacifica is home to a variety of
restaurants, breweries, and wine bars
– bringing local flavor and activity to
its business districts.
Many of the best walkable cities have
many restaurants within close
proximity of each other, which can
serve as an amenity for residents and
visitors and supports vibrant
commercial districts.
Source: Yelp (ratings out of 5.0), Coastside Magazine
b
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 49
PACIFIC MANOR / FAIRMONT
b
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 50
PACIFIC MANOR / FAIRMONT OVERVIEW
Pacific Manor / Fairmont area have two shopping centers:
Fairmont Shopping Center, a 52k+ SF Safeway anchor center near Hickey Blvd & Skyline Blvd in the northeast portion of the City Pacific Manor is also anchored by Safeway and a variety of small retailers and restaurants at northern entrance to City
Residential neighborhoods include single-family as well as clusters of multifamily properties.
District is home to ~5,000 households and 14,600 people. Area is slightly younger relative to the City median age, and has household incomes close to the City average.
10-year retail sales tax data from HdL shows this area is the largest sales tax generator of the five districts (~$540k in 2022), but sales have barely increased over 2014 levels, the worst performance of any district.
$0.0
$0.1
$0.2
$0.3
$0.4
$0.5
$0.6
$0.7
$0.8
Millions
Pacific Manor/Fairmont:
Sales Tax History
Sales Tax Revenue
Source: City of Pacifica, HdL, ESRI Business Analyst Online, CoStar b
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 51
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS OF SHOPPING CENTERS
Fairmont Shopping Center
Safeway, Rite Aid, Shops & Restaurants
Pacific Manor Shopping Centers
Safeway, Walgreens, Shops & Restaurants
Safeway
Rite Aid
Dollar Tree
24 Hour Fitness
Pacific Manor
Hardware
Safeway
Walgreens
Manor Dr
b
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 52
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
J-20 A-20 J-20 O-20 J-21 A-21 J-21 O-21 J-22 A-22 J-22
Visitor Traffic: Comparison to
Pre-Covid Baseline
City of Pacifica
Fairmont Shopping Center
FAIRMONT SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
• Fairmont Shopping Center
experienced ~30,000 weekly
visitors, generally in-line with the
pre-Covid baseline and Pacifica’s
overall post-Covid visit recovery.
• Many visitors are from Pacifica,
Daly City, and San Francisco; 64%
of visitors live within 3 miles of
the center.
• Visits to the center peak between
4 - 5 pm.
• Visits are generally stable across
the week, with slightly higher
levels Friday – Saturday.
Source: Placer.ai
Current Visitor Data
Annual Visits 1.6 mil
Median Weekly Visits 29,800
Visit Frequency 6.3 visits / year
Median Visit Length 29 min.
Avg. HH Income $119k
*Visits between 8/21 – 7/22
b
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 53
FAIRMONT SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
Fairmont Shopping Center
True Trade Area
Source: Placer.ai, 12/21 – 11/22
Shopping Center Annual Visits by Visitor Home Location
City Number Percentage
Pacifica 440,000 28%
Daly City 470,000 30%
San Francisco 230,000 15%
South San Francisco 110,000 7%
San Bruno 90,000 6%
San Mateo 10,000 1%
San Jose 10,000 1%
Half Moon Bay Area 10,000 1%
1 - 3 Miles 980,000 63%
3 – 10 Miles 380,000 24%
10+ Miles 190,000 12%
b
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 54
PACIFIC MANOR SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
• Pacific Manor Shopping Center
experienced ~16,800 weekly
visitors over the past year –
approx. 40% above the pre-Covid
baseline.
• Most common visitor home
locations are San Francisco,
Pacifica, and Daly City; 43% of
visitors live with 3 miles of the
center.
• Visits to the center peak between
6 - 8 pm, with a secondary peak
between 1 - 3pm.
• Visits are strongest Friday –
Sunday, with ~51% of weekly visits
occurring on those days.
Source: Placer.ai
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
J-20 A-20 J-20 O-20 J-21 A-21 J-21 O-21 J-22 A-22 J-22
Visitor Traffic: Comparison to
Pre-Covid Baseline
City of Pacifica
Pacific Manor Shopping Center
Current Visitor Data
Annual Visits 865,900
Median Weekly Visits 16,800
Visit Frequency 3.4 visits /
year
Median Visit Length 36 min.
Avg. HH Income $120k
*Visits between 8/21 – 7/22
b
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 55
PACIFIC MANOR SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
Pacific Manor Shopping Center
True Trade Area
Shopping Center Annual Visits by Visitor Home Location
City Number Percentage
Pacifica 320,000 37%
Daly City 100,000 11%
San Francisco 180,000 20%
South San Francisco 50,000 5%
San Bruno 20,000 2%
Half Moon Bay Area 20,000 1%
San Jose 10,000 1%
San Mateo 10,000 2%
1 - 3 Miles 370,000 42%
3 – 10 Miles 300,000 34%
10+ Miles 210,000 24%
Source: Placer.ai, 12/21 – 11/22
b
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 56
PACIFIC MANOR / FAIRMONT FINDINGS
Pacific Manor Center Area
Gateway to City from the north
Challenges with signage, vacancy, coordination of multiple landowners Large concentration of retail and residential development No undeveloped sites – will require redevelopment of existing properties Substantial refurbishment of Pacific Manor Shopping Center needed Fairmont Center Area
Strong grocery-anchored center surrounded by residential neighborhoods, draws visitors from Pacifica as well as other nearby cities
No undeveloped sites – healthy neighborhood shopping center b
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 57
PACIFIC MANOR / FAIRMONT RECOMMENDATIONS
There were no significant undeveloped sites found in the Pacific Manor or Fairmont neighborhood. Kosmont recommends upgrading the signage and appearance of the Safeway anchored Manor Shopping Center Safeway.
Create Coast Highway and offramp visible signage announcing Pacifica Business District Timing
Meetings with Manor owners and State officials would be a near term priority Next Steps:
City should work with the Manor shopping center owners to encourage rehabilitation and/or renovation of center signage and store front façade
Work with State to add Coast Highway signage before first exit from the north b
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 58
SHARP PARK / EUREKA SQUARE
b
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 59
SHARP PARK / EUREKA SQUARE OVERVIEW
Sharp Park / Eureka Square district:
Eureka Square, a 93k+ SF neighborhood center anchored by Oceana Market east of Hwy 1
Small strip centers and other freestanding retailers along Palmetto Ave and Francisco Blvd
High concentration of multifamily properties
District is home to ~1,900 households and 4,600 people. Area has a median age close to the Citywide benchmark, and has household incomes that are slightly below the City average. Area has the highest percentage of renter occupied housing units (50%) of the five districts. 10-year retail sales tax data from HdL shows this district generated ~$250k in sales tax in 2022, with significant growth over the past 10 years (9.8% CAGR), particularly since 2020.
$0.0
$0.1
$0.2
$0.3
$0.4
$0.5
Millions
Sharp Park/Eureka Square:
Sales Tax History
Sales Tax Revenue
Source: City of Pacifica, HdL, ESRI Business Analyst Online, CoStar b
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 60
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
Palmetto Ave
Retail Shops, Small Offices & Restaurants
Beach Blvd Hotel Site
Oceana Market
Eureka Square Shopping Center
Oceana Market, Shops & Restaurants
b
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 61
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
J-20 A-20 J-20 O-20 J-21 A-21 J-21 O-21 J-22 A-22 J-22
Visitor Traffic: Comparison to
Pre-Covid Baseline
City of Pacifica
Eureka Shopping Center
EUREKA SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
• Eureka Square Shopping Center
experienced ~9,300 weekly visitors
over the past year – approx. 7%
above the pre-Covid baseline, and
generally overperforming Pacifica’s
overall post-Covid visit recovery.
• Most common visitor home
locations are Pacifica, San Francisco,
Daly City; 45% of visitors live
within 3 miles of the center.
• Visits to the center peak between 3
- 4 pm, with ~80% of visits
between 11am - 8pm.
• Visits are generally stable across
the week, with slightly higher levels
on Saturday.
Source: Placer.ai
Current Visitor Data
Annual Visits 485,700
Median Weekly Visits 9,300
Visit Frequency 4.0 visits /
year
Median Visit Length 35 min.
Avg. HH Income $129k
*Visits between 8/21 – 7/22
b
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 62
EUREKA SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
Eureka Square Shopping Center
True Trade Area
Shopping Center Annual Visits by Visitor Home Location
City Number Percentage
Pacifica 220,000 42%
Daly City 50,000 10%
San Francisco 70,000 13%
South San Francisco 20,000 5%
San Bruno 20,000 4%
San Mateo 10,000 2%
San Jose 10,000 1%
Half Moon Bay Area 30,000 6%
1 - 3 Miles 220,000 42%
3 – 10 Miles 170,000 33%
10+ Miles 130,000 25%
Source: Placer.ai, 12/21 – 11/22
b
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 63
SHARP PARK / EUREKA SQUARE FINDINGS
Sharp Park area is home to City Hall, Pacifica Pier, Main library and is adjacent to the Countyowned historic Sharp Park Golf Course Sharp Park is suited as future “downtown” for the City using new Specific Plan guidelines The City-owned Beach Blvd. site is a strong development opportunity site for expansion of tourism facilities and to activate Palmetto Avenue
Eureka Square, located on east side of Coast Highway, has recently undergone major renovation
b
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 64
SHARP PARK / EUREKA SQUARE RECOMMENDATIONS
There are several sites suitable for development within the Palmetto Ave. corridor to create a downtown district:
• Beach Blvd 3.5 acre former wastewater treatment site well suited for hotel/commercial or community development • Five Palmetto Ave. parcels – from 0.11 to 0.36 acres each suited for residential/commercial development Timing
Based on current economic conditions, development will likely be several years away Meeting with property owners and starting Surplus Land Act process is near term priority Next Steps:
• Educate property owners on the benefits of the recently adopted Specific Plan • City work with City & County of San Francisco to expand activities/promotion of historic Sharp Park Golf Course • Publicly-owned land needs go through the State HCD’s Surplus Land Act before private development can occur (i.e., Beach Blvd. site)
b
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 65
ROCKAWAY BEACH / VALLEMAR
b
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 66
ROCKAWAY BEACH / VALLEMAR OVERVIEW
Rockaway Beach / Vallemar district is home to multiple hotels and a variety of small restaurants / shops / local offices near Rockaway Beach Ave and Cabrillo Hwy with multiple property owners. Residential neighborhoods are primarily single-family, with some small multifamily properties.
District is home to ~1,300 households and 3,400 people. Area is relatively older and has higher household incomes compared to the City averages, and has the highest percentage of owneroccupied housing units. 10-year retail sales tax data from HdL shows this district generated ~$230k in sales tax in 2022, with little growth over the past 10 years (0.9% CAGR).
The district is home to 236 hotel rooms, ~75% of the City’s hotel inventory; Citywide TOT generates ~$2.1m for General Fund $0.0
$0.1
$0.2
$0.3
$0.4
$0.5
2013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Millions
Rockaway Beach/Vallemar:
Sales Tax History
Sales Tax Revenue
Source: City of Pacifica, HdL, ESRI Business Analyst Online, CoStar b
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 67
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Quarry Site
Rockaway
Beach
Fairfield Inn & Suites
Pacifica Lighthouse Hotel
Sea Breeze Motel
Inn at Rockaway
b
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 68
ROCKAWAY BEACH PLAZA
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
• Rockaway Beach Plaza had ~14,200
weekly visitors over the past year – 3%
above the pre-Covid baseline, slightly
over Pacifica’s overall post-Covid visit
recovery.
• Most common visitor home locations are
San Francisco, Pacifica and Daly City;
22% of visitors living with 3 miles of the
center.
• Visits peak between 6 - 8 pm, and are
generally spread throughout the day.
• Visits are highest Saturday/Sunday, with
~43% of weekly visits occurring those
days.
Source: Placer.ai
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
J-20 A-20 J-20 O-20 J-21 A-21 J-21 O-21 J-22 A-22 J-22
Visitor Traffic: Comparison to
Pre-Covid Baseline
City of Pacifica
Rockaway Beach Plaza
Current Visitor Data
Annual Visits 740,200
Median Weekly Visits 14,200
Visit Frequency 2.3 visits /
year
Median Visit Length 68 min.
Avg. HH Income $124k
*Visits between 8/21 – 7/22
b
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 69
ROCKAWAY BEACH PLAZA
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
Rockaway Beach Plaza
True Trade Area
Shopping Center Annual Visits by Visitor Home Location
City Number Percentage
Pacifica 160,000 23%
Daly City 40,000 5%
San Francisco 70,000 10%
South San Francisco 30,000 4%
San Bruno 20,000 3%
San Mateo 20,000 2%
San Jose 20,000 3%
Half Moon Bay Area 20,000 3%
1 - 3 Miles 160,000 22%
3 – 10 Miles 170,000 24%
10+ Miles 380,000 54%
Source: Placer.ai, 12/21 – 11/22
b
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 70
ROCKAWAY BEACH / VALLEMAR FINDINGS
Rockaway Beach is the main tourism center for the City District has largest concentration of hotel rooms and restaurants With multiple property ownership redevelopment is challenging There are limited parking facilities for such a large concentration of commercial Wednesday Farmer’s Market utilizes much of the parking areas Quarry site is a strong development opportunity site for expansion of tourism facilities b
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 71
ROCKAWAY BEACH / VALLEMAR RECOMMENDATIONS
There are two opportunity sites Kosmont identified:
The flat southeastern 20-acre portion of Quarry site is well suited for residential and for high end hospitality development to expand amenities for Rockaway as a major tourist location Approximately 2-3 acres of the parking lot of the Sea Bowl site may be considered for medium to high density blended-use housing/commercial while retaining bowling and restaurant uses Timing
Based on current economic conditions, new development will be several years away Meeting with property owners could be near term priority Next Steps:
City could work with ownership to upgrade Lighthouse Hotel facility Initiate Specific plan process with ownership / encourage low density visitor serving uses Meet with Sea Bowl ownership to discuss long term plans b
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 72
LINDA MAR / SUN VALLEY
b
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 73
LINDA MAR / SUN VALLEY OVERVIEW
Linda Mar / Sun Valley has three primary shopping areas:
Linda Mar Shopping Center, an 89k+ SF community center anchored by Safeway near Linda Mar Blvd and Cabrillo Hwy Park Mall Center, a 48k+ SF neighborhood center
Pacifica Athletic Center, a 22k+ SF neighborhood center Residential is primarily single-family, with some clusters of small multifamily units.
District is home to ~5,570 households (the largest of the five districts). Area is older than City median, with lower
household incomes than Citywide average.
10-year retail sales tax data from HdL shows this district generated ~$465k in sales tax in 2022 (the second-highest district), with annual growth of ~3.8% since 2013.
$0.0
$0.1
$0.2
$0.3
$0.4
$0.5
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Millions
Linda Mar/Sun Valley: Sales Tax
History
Sales Tax Revenue
Source: City of Pacifica, HdL, ESRI Business Analyst Online, CoStar b
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 74
LINDA MAR CENTER & SAMTRANS PARK AND RIDE
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Taco Bell Pacifica Beach
Safeway
Rite Aid
Ross Dress for Less
SamTrans Park and Ride
b
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 75
PARK MALL CENTER
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Park Mall Center
Sun Valley
Fine Foods
Library
b
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 76
COMMUNITY CENTER
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Community
Center
Skate
Park
Parking
Field
b
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 77
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
J-20 A-20 J-20 O-20 J-21 A-21 J-21 O-21 J-22 A-22 J-22
Visitor Traffic: Comparison to
Pre-COVID Baseline
City of Pacifica
Linda Mar Shopping Center
LINDA MAR SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
• Linda Mar Shopping Center had
~40,500 weekly visitors over the past
year – 5% above the pre-Covid
baseline, slightly over Pacifica’s postCovid visit recovery. • Most common visitor home locations
are San Francisco, Pacifica, and Daly
City; 44% of visitors living with 3 miles
of the center.
• Visits to the center peak between 3 -
5 pm, with ~80% of trips between
11am – 8pm.
• Visits are stable across the week, with
slightly higher levels Saturday –
Sunday.
Source: Placer.ai
Current Visitor Data
Annual Visits 2.1 mil
Median Weekly Visits 40,500
Visit Frequency
6.5 visits /
year
Median Visit Length 31 min.
Avg. HH Income $130k
*Visits between 8/21 – 7/22
b
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 78
LINDA MAR SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
Linda Mar Shopping Center
True Trade Area
Shopping Center Annual Visits by Visitor Home Location
City Number Percentage
Pacifica 1,090,000 48%
Half Moon Bay Area 350,000 16%
San Francisco 190,000 8%
Daly City 110,000 5%
South San Francisco 50,000 2%
San Bruno 30,000 1%
San Jose 30,000 1%
San Mateo 20,000 1%
1 - 3 Miles 990,000 44%
3 – 10 Miles 670,000 30%
10+ Miles 600,000 27%
Source: Placer.ai, 12/21 – 11/22
b
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 79
LINDA MAR / SUN VALLEY FINDINGS
Linda Mar Center is the gateway to City from the South Linda Mar Center has professional management, institutional ownership which is beneficial to new development
The District has City’s largest concentration of retail and residential Linda Mar Center unused parking area in SE corner of center is potential residential or mixed-use development site (See Section 4 for detailed discussion of opportunity sites) Park Mall has small commercial land parcel plus vacant land behind library SamTrans Park and Ride lot is proximate to beach and could be developed for higher use The Pacifica Community Center is oceanfront site - valuable opportunity for public/private partnership for commercial use and upgraded community facilities – Surplus Lands Act requirements will likely apply
b
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 80
LINDA MAR / SUN VALLEY RECOMMENDATIONS
There are four opportunity sites Kosmont identified:
The SamTrans Park & Ride lot is high value location suited for commercial development The surplus parking area behind Safeway is recommended to be considered for high density blended use residential / commercial or replacement site for Park & Ride lot across from Linda Mar Center The Community Center and parking lot are high value properties that City could leverage Park Mall / Sanchez Library parcels are lower priority sites Timing
Based on current economic conditions, new development will be several years away Analysis of Community Center site and meeting with property owners could be near term priority Next Steps:
Discussions with SamTrans to consider Public/Private Partnership (“P3”) development on the Park & Ride lot Analyze obstacles and redevelopment opportunities for Community Center site across from Linda Mar Beach. How large building needed for community services? Other locations that can accommodate some of them? Discuss blended-use development options for surplus parking area behind Safeway with Kimco b
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 81
PEDRO POINT
b
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 82
PEDRO POINT OVERVIEW
Pedro Point district is the smallest district in the City, characterized by the Pedro Point Shopping Center, a 32k+ SF center anchored by Grocery Outlet with fitness, popular retailers and restaurants.
Residential neighborhood is hillside single-family.
District is home to ~350 households and 900 people. Area has the oldest median age of the five districts, highest level of bachelor degrees, and highest household income levels.
10-year retail sales tax data from HdL shows this district generated ~$135k in sales tax in 2022 (the lowest district), with annual growth of ~10.4% since 2013 (the highest district). $0.0 $0.1
$0.2
$0.3
$0.4
$0.5
2013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Millions
Pedro Point: Sales Tax
History
Sales Tax Revenue
Source: City of Pacifica, HdL, ESRI Business Analyst Online, CoStar b
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 83
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Pacifica Beach
Linda Mar
Shopping Center
Grocery Outlet
Ace Hardware
b
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 84
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
J-20 A-20 J-20 O-20 J-21 A-21 J-21 O-21 J-22 A-22 J-22
Visitor Traffic: Comparison to
Pre-Covid Baseline
City of Pacifica
Pedro Point Shopping Center
PEDRO POINT SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
• Pedro Point Shopping Center had
~16,400 weekly visitors over the
past year – approx. 25% above the
pre-Covid baseline, and over
Pacifica’s post-Covid recovery.
• Many visitor home locations in San
Francisco and Daly City
• Visits to the center peak between
1 - 2 pm
• Visits are generally stable thru the
week, slightly higher on Saturday –
Sunday.
Source: Placer.ai
Current Visitor Data
Annual Visits 871,000
Median Weekly Visits 16,400
Visit Frequency 3.8 visits /
year
Median Visit Length 44 min.
Avg. HH Income $141k
*Visits between 8/21 – 7/22
b
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 85
PEDRO POINT SHOPPING CENTER
VISITOR ANALYTICS – PLACER.AI
Pedro Point Shopping Center
True Trade Area
Shopping Center Annual Visits by Visitor Home Location
City Number Percentage
Pacifica 350,000 40%
San Francisco 110,000 13%
Half Moon Bay Area 100,000 11%
Daly City 30,000 3%
South San Francisco 20,000 2%
San Mateo 10,000 1%
San Jose 10,000 1%
San Mateo 10,000 1%
1 - 3 Miles 290,000 33%
3 – 10 Miles 250,000 28%
10+ Miles 330,000 38%
Source: Placer.ai, 12/21 – 11/22
b
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 86
PEDRO POINT FINDINGS
Poor access with entrance located off Coast Highway
Vibrant retail center with new fitness facility and Grocery Outlet rehab Vacant 5-acre parcel behind shopping center possible residential development site, but subject to complicated permitting processes with Coastal Commission and City jurisdictions b
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 87
4. OPPORTUNITY SITES
Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study
b
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 88
POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITY
SITES
Based on Kosmont’s research, district analysis and input gathered during the stakeholder / community outreach
process, Kosmont identified several opportunity sites for potential commercial or blended use development. For City owned sites, long term ground leases are strategic options that can provide additional annual revenue.
1. Beach Blvd site
2. Palmetto Ave sites
3. Quarry site
4. Sea Bowl parking field site
5. Linda Mar Center parking field / site
6. Park Mall and library surplus land site
7. SamTrans Park and Ride site
8. Community Center site
See detailed site information on following pages
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
b
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 89
SURPLUS LAND ACT CONSIDERATIONS
(FOR PUBLIC AGENCY OWNED PROPERTIES)
Some of the potential opportunity sites such as the Beach Blvd Hotel site, the SamTrans Park and Ride site, and the Community Center site must comply with State mandates prior to selling / leasing.
The Surplus Land Act (SLA) was passed in response to the housing shortage in California. Public agency owned property cannot be sold or leased until it complies with the SLA, with certain exceptions.
SLA requires an up to 150-day (NOA for 60 days + good faith negotiations for 90 days) RFP process to either select or reject an affordable housing project/proposal. City does not have to sell the property for less than fair market value. If rejected, property can be sold to broader market. After completing the process, any development will be subject to a covenant requiring any residential development with 10 or more units to provide at least 15% of units available to low-income households.
If local agency does not comply with SLA, HCD will impose fine of 30% of final sale price for first violation, 50% of final sale price for second violation. City should engage real estate and legal counsel to navigate SLA process and conduct appropriate property due diligence.
SLA Required Disposition Process
1. Declaration of the property as either “surplus” or “exempt surplus.”
2. If declared “surplus,” disseminate a Notice of Availability (NOA) offering the property to other government agencies and affordable housing developers for a period of 60 days.
3. If the City receives letters of interest from government agencies and/or affordable housing developers, then it must negotiate in good faith with those interested parties for a period of 90 days.
4. After the 90-day good faith negotiation period, the City must notify the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and provide information that documents compliance with the process and request a letter of compliance.
5. HCD has 30 days to respond to City with questions/request for more information and, at the conclusion of the 30-day period, must provide a letter stating that the City has complied with the process or not. b
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 90
BEACH BLVD HOTEL OPPORTUNITY SITE
Address 2212 Beach Blvd
APN(s) 016-204-020
016-294-620
Current AV -
Acreage 3.5 AC
Ownership City of Pacifica
Surrounding Use(s) Low-density multifamily, commercial
Opportunity
Key oceanfront site can be anchor for
new “downtown” district. Hotel and
retail would be ideal on long term
ground lease.
Palmetto Ave
Montecito Ave
Beach Blvd
b
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 91
RECOMMENDATIONS / ECONOMIC BENEFITS
As an oceanfront community approximately 10
miles south of San Francisco, there is strong
demand for high value hotels with proper
marketing and attraction to leisure travelers.
However, Pacifica has limited upscale hospitality
facilities, especially compared to Half Moon Bay.
The City has envisioned this site as a
future hotel/commercial/mixed/blended use
site. An RFP was issued in late 2019 but
was withdrawn after the COVID pandemic hit.
Background
The City owns a 3.5 acre former
wastewater treatment ocean front site on
Beach Blvd. in the heart of the Sharp Park
district near the Pacifica Pier. According to
the Sharp Park Specific Plan the height limit
is 55 feet, which makes it well suited for
hotel or residential use over ground floor
commercial.
Next Steps
1. Determine if hotel and complimentary uses are still desired by City.
2. Given recently adopted Surplus Land Act (“SLA”) requirements, before private development can occur, City may consider alternative public uses (possible relocation of Community Center).
3. If private development is desired, then SLA process must be initiated to promote the site to potential affordable housing developers throughout the State per Housing & Community Development.
4. If affordable housing developers are not interested or unable to reach agreement with City, then reissue RFQ/P for private development.
5. Can consider leasing the site to provide long term revenue source.
Economic Benefits
A moderate sized select service hotel development on half of the site could yield approximately +$500,000 in annual tax revenues to City, while a residential development of 50-60 units on remaining half could add approximately +$30 million in assessed value and bring $1 million in new resident spending. This could yield +$150,000 in annual tax revenue to City.
b
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 92
PALMETTO AVE SITES
1 2 3 4 5
Address 2022 Palmetto
Ave
2100 Palmetto
Ave
2107 Palmetto
Ave
2205
Palmetto Ave
APN(s) 016-032-310 016-181-410 016-182-370
016-182-390 016-192-320 016-211-210
AV (2021) $75,033 $557,124 $420,469 $404,302 $509,626
Acreage 0.36 0.18 0.13 0.31 0.11
Ownership Thomas E
Bishop
Ahmad
Alshamari
Dymond Coast
LLC Ahmad Alshamari Kevin Hale
Surrounding
Use(s) Main Street commercial / retail, low-density multifamily residential Opportunity Sharp Park Specific Plan guidelines for blend of commercial and residential uses would liven foot traffic and benefit Palmetto Ave. businesses. 1 2
3 4
5 Salada Ave
San Jose Ave
Santa Rosa Ave
Montecito Ave
b
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 93
RECOMMENDATIONS / ECONOMIC BENEFITS
The recently adopted Sharp Park Specific
Plan is designed to provide a downtown
district for Pacifica and complete
neighborhood for future residents.
There are several vacant Palmetto Ave.
parcels from 0.11 to 0.36 acres each
totaling approximately 1 acre that are
privately owned and can be developed with
moderate density mixed / blended-use
according to Specific Plan.
Palmetto Ave. is the backbone of the
neighborhood with mix of uses to attract
visitors and allow them to linger. Strong
housing demand makes this is an excellent
opportunity.
Background
Palmetto Ave. is the main street in the Sharp Park neighborhood. Historically this has been a heavily residential area. In addition to the new Specific Plan, the City has recently completed ½ mile of bicycle and pedestrian improvements to increase mobility.
Next Steps
1. Discuss the benefits of the recently adopted Specific Plan with property owners
2. Consider developing public parking lots to accommodate more visitors Economic Benefits
Blended use development of 30-40 units is possible on these parcels and could add approximately +$30 million in assessed value and bring $1 million in new resident spending yielding up to $100,000 in City tax revenues; in addition, new residents would bring important daytime activity to the street.
b
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 94
QUARRY OPPORTUNITY SITE
Address
APN(s)
018-150-110
018-150-120
018-150-150
Current AV $5,379,000
Acreage 39.1 AC (as outlined)
Ownership Preserve @ Pacifica LLC
Surrounding Use(s) Open space, hotel, commercial,
residential
Opportunity
Key site to expand Rockaway visitor
facilities. Could be a boutique hotel
and event center on southern portion
of site together with residential.
b
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 95
RECOMMENDATIONS / ECONOMIC BENEFITS
The most significant opportunity site for
the City is located in Rockaway /
Vallemar area. Rockaway is the City’s
hospitality center, but it lacks many
amenities including high quality facilities
and parking.
Southern portion of the flat or Eastern
parcel (approximately 20 acres) of the
Quarry site is well suited for residential
and for high end hospitality development
to expand amenities for Rockaway as a
major tourist location (see case study of
unique hospitality concepts in Section 2
– Land Use Trends). The hillside areas
comprising half of the site would be
preserved for open space.
Background
A former rock quarry, the 39-acre flat portion of site is strategically located between the Rockaway hotels, Pacific Ocean and Coast Highway. Development proposals have had extensive history of community opposition, especially housing development. 1983 Ordinance 391-c.s. was approved and rezoned the site to C3 commercial, with a provision that requires a citywide public vote to approve new housing.
Next Steps
Initiate Specific Plan process with ownership and encourage low density highvalue visitor serving uses in conjunction with housing development.
Economic Benefits
Luxury hospitality development of 75-100 “bungalows” on Quarry site could add approximately $50 million in AV and yield $500,000 to $1 million in TOT and sales tax, plus over $50,000 in property taxes to the General Fund. Residential development could add another $50 million in AV and $2 million in increased retail sales potential to local businesses.
b
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 96
SEA BOWL PARKING LOT OPPORTUNITY SITE
Address 4625 Coast Hwy
APN(s) 022-150-440
Current AV $1,351,000
Acreage 8.81 AC
Ownership Sea Bowl Pacifica Inc
Surrounding Use(s) Pacifica Brewery, open space,
commercial, residential
Opportunity
With highway visibility additional retail
and multi-family housing can be
accommodated on underutilized
portion of site
b
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 97
RECOMMENDATIONS / ECONOMIC BENEFITS
Two popular entertainment venues in
the City, the 32-lane Sea Bowl and
lounge and the 3,700 SF Pacifica Brewing
Company are located on an 8.8-acre site.
Background
The existing buildings occupy
approximately 40,000 square feet for a
floor area ratio (“FAR”) of 0.1. With
such low density, 1/3rd of the parking lot
could be reconfigured for medium to
high density blended use providing up to
100 multifamily units and 5,000 SF of
additional commercial, or alternatively
add 15,000 to 20,000 SF of additional
restaurant / entertainment.
Next Steps
City and property owners could examine potential rezoning of the site.
Economic Benefits
A blended use development of 80-100 units would add approximately +$50 million in assessed value and bring $2 million in retail sales from new resident spending. This could yield +$200,000 in annual tax revenue to City, in addition to retaining these important retail / entertainment venues. b
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 98
LINDA MAR UNDERUTILIZED PARKING OPPORTUNITY SITE
Address 1380 Linda Mar Blvd
APN(s)
023-041-190
023-041-200
023-041-270 (partial)
Current AV NA
Acreage 1.9 AC
Ownership Linda Mar SC LP
Surrounding Use(s) Retail / commercial, residential
Opportunity
If overflow parking is not required for
shopping center, could accommodate
~60 units of housing plus 5,000 -
10,000 SF retail
b
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 99
RECOMMENDATIONS / ECONOMIC BENEFITS
A priority opportunity site within Linda
Mar / Sun Valley is the surplus ~2-acre
parking area behind the Linda Mar
Center Safeway.
Kosmont recommends it be considered
for high density blended use residential /
commercial uses.
Background
This site provides overflow parking for the shopping center, per City code. It was identified in the most recent Housing Element as a site for new residential development.
Next Steps
1. Discuss blended-use development options for surplus parking area behind Safeway with owner of shopping center (Kimco).
2. City / Kimco to analyze potential for parking variance at Linda Mar Center.
Economic Benefits
A blended use development of 60-80 units would add approximately +$40 million in assessed value and bring $1-2 million in new resident spending. This could yield +$150,000 in annual tax revenue to City.
b
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 100
PARK MALL OPPORTUNITY SITES
1 2 3
Address 1055 Terra Nova Blvd 725 Oddstad Blvd Sanchez Library / Park APN(s) 023-593-070 023-593-160 023-593-140
AV (2021) $459,334 $796,566 -
Acreage 0.41 AC 2.14 AC 2.77 AC
Ownership Charles Douglas
O’Connor Cabot Layne Sheley City of Pacifica
Surrounding Use(s) Retail, low-density residential
Opportunity
Parcel 1 potential retail pad bldg. Parcel 2 potential commercial / mixed use development; Parcel 3 potential residential/blended use on undeveloped library park land.
1 2
3 b
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 101
RECOMMENDATIONS / ECONOMIC BENEFITS
Park Mall is a 48,000 square foot
community center in the eastern section
of Linda Mar. It is anchored by Sun
Valley Fine Foods.
Kosmont recommends that area be
considered for medium density blended
use residential / commercial uses.
Background
There are some vacant parcels surrounding the center, including the Sanchez Park that are owned by the City. The Sanchez Library facility is to be retained as part of City’s library master plan.
Next Steps
1. Analyze need for City owned surplus land.
2. Meet with private property owners at Park Mall to discuss development opportunities (both retail and multi-family).
Economic Benefits
Blended use development of 50-60 units could add approximately +$30 million in assessed value and bring $1 million in new resident spending. This could yield +$100,000 in annual tax revenue to City.
b
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 102
SAMTRANS PARK & RIDE OPPORTUNITY SITE
Address Cabrillo Hwy & Linda Mar Blvd,
behind gas station
APN(s) -
Current AV -
Acreage ~2 AC
Ownership SamTrans
Surrounding Use(s) Gas station, residential, retail center Opportunity
Retail pad is viable or possible
Airstream Trailer Hotel that requires
minimal investment. SamTrans will
need to relocate Park and Ride
b
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 103
RECOMMENDATIONS / ECONOMIC BENEFITS
The SamTrans Park & Ride lot is an
approximately 2-acre site in a high value
location across from Linda Mar Center
and Coast Highway.
Potential uses could be a “Steelcraft”
container type food court, retail pads
or “Airstream type” hospitality trailer
park.
Background
This site is owned by SamTrans, the regional transportation provider for use as Park & Ride lot for commuters to San Francisco area. The site does not appear to be heavily utilized. Given its excellent location, SamTrans may consider a public/private development opportunity.
Next Steps
1. Open discussions with SamTrans to consider doing commercial development under long term ground lease
2. Determine potential new parking sites for commuters (perhaps east side of Linda Mar Center)
Economic Benefits
Commercial development could bring approximately $100,000 to $250,000 per year in retail sales and/or TOT to the City General Fund. b
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 104
COMMUNITY CENTER OPPORTUNITY SITE
Address 540 Crespi Drive
APN(s) 022-162-420
Building Size 18,955 SF
Acreage 5.0 AC
Ownership City of Pac Fin Authority Lessee
Surrounding Use(s) Oceanfont, Commercial, residential
Opportunity
Potential public/private partnership
for commercial leases within the
community center facilities,
b
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 105
RECOMMENDATIONS / ECONOMIC BENEFITS
The Community Center and parking lot
at 540 Crespi Drive are valuable ocean
frontage properties estimated at 5 acres
in size. Ideally suited for retail uses as
well as community programs currently in
operation.
Background
This facility is a former AT&T operator
switching station, acquired by the City in
1986 and renovated as a community
center in 1988. The public parking lot
serves center, as well as Linda Mar Beach
visitors. The facility is currently housing
City Hall while the main facility is under
construction in Sharp Park.
Next Steps
1. Assess how much of the building area is needed for community services.
2. Can some limited commercial uses be accommodated in the building or parking lot
3. If redevelopment is considered, City must proceed through HCD’s SLA process to promote site to affordable housing developers.
4. Can consider leasing portions of the site.
Economic Benefits
Blended use development of 80-100 units plus retail pad could add approximately +$50 million in assessed value and bring $2 million in new visitor and resident spending, which could yield +$100,000 in annual tax revenues.
Commercial development could bring up to $100,000 per year in retail sales and/or TOT to the City General Fund.
b
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 106
5. APPENDIX – DEMOGRAPHIC, ECONOMIC AND MARKET DATA
Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study
b
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 107
A. DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study
b
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 108
DEMOGRAPHIC SUMMARY
Pacifica has a population of ~38,000, with essentially no population growth over the past 20 years Average Household Size is 2.7 persons, and the Median Age is 43.9 years; residents are well educated, with ~51% achieving at least a bachelors degree City Average Household Income is $182,000, approx. ~3% less than San Mateo County and 41% higher than statewide levels
Pacifica sees a Net Outflow of ~15,740 jobs, with workers going to surrounding job centers such as San Francisco, South San Francisco, San Mateo, and Daly City Jobs in the City are primarily in the Accommodation / Food Services, Educational Services, Healthcare / Social Assistance, and Retail Trade sectors
Residents of the City are primarily employed in the Healthcare / Social Assistance, Professional / Scientific / Technical Services, Educational Services, and Accommodation / Food Services, sectors b
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 109
POPULATION & INCOME
CITY, COUNTY, AND STATE
2022 Pacifica
City
San Mateo
County
California
State
Population 38,458 769,689 39,770,476
Households 14,064 270,845 13,570,050
Average HH Size 2.7 2.8 2.9
Median Age 43.9 41 36.7
% Bachelor's Degree or Higher 50.6% 55.5% 37.8%
Per Capita Income $66,642 $71,302 $44,265
Median HH Income $146,648 $150,965 $88,930
Average HH Income $182,144 $202,452 $129,367
Median Home Value $1,076,093 $1,387,819 $629,224
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
b
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 110
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Population Growth, 2000 - 2021
Pacifica San Mateo California
POPULATION GROWTH, 2000 – 2022
PACIFICA, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Source: California Department of Finance, 2022
b
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 111
POPULATION BY AGE
PACIFICA HAS A STRONG BABY BOOMER POPULATION
Generation Population
(2022)
0 - 14 Years Old 6,000
15 – 24 Years Old 4,000
25 – 34 Years Old 4,800
35 - 44 Years Old 5,000
45 - 54 Years Old 5,200
55 – 64 Years Old 6,000
65 – 74 Years Old 4,700
75+ Years Old 2,800
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
0 - 14 Years
Old, 16%
15 – 24 Years
Old, 11%
25 – 34 Years
Old, 12%
35 - 44 Years
Old, 13%
45 - 54 Years
Old, 14%
55 – 64 Years
Old, 16%
65 – 74 Years
Old, 12%
75+ Years
Old, 7%
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
b
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 112
POPULATION BY EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
PACIFICA HAS A WELL EDUCATED POPULATION
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
20% 20%
10%
31%
19%
23%
14%
7%
32%
23%
35%
19%
9%
24%
14%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
HS Grad, GED, or Less Some College, No Degree Associate Degree Bachelor's Degree Graduate / Professional Degree
2022 Population by Educational Attainment
Pacifica
City
San Mateo
County
California
State
b
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 113
POPULATION BY INCOME
PACIFICA HAS A HIGHER PERCENTAGE OF HIGH EARNERS
6%
8%
18%
20% 19%
30%
7% 9%
17% 17%
14%
37%
13%
15%
27%
19%
11%
16%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
<$25,000 $25,000 - $50,000 $50,000 - $100,000 $100,000 - $150,000 $150,000 - $200,000 >$200,000 2021 Households by Income Level
Pacifica
City
San Mateo
County
California
State
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
b
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 114
HOUSING & HOUSEHOLD SIZE
CITY HAS A GREATER SHARE OF 2-PERSON HHS & OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS 0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7+
Households by Household Size
2010 Census Data
Pacifica
City
San Mateo
County
California
State
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
% Renter Occupied Housing Units % Owner Occupied Housing Units Owner & Renter Owned Housing Units
2022 Estimate
Pacifica
City
San Mateo
County
California
State
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
b
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 115
PACIFICA
DISTRICTS
Black boundary line shows southern Pacifica City limit.
Red district boundary lines are based on Census Tracts / Block Groups approximate Business District boundaries
Sources: ESRI BAO Online, City of Pacifica
Pacific Manor /
Fairmont
Sharp Park /
Eureka Square
Rockaway Beach
/ Vallemar
Linda Mar /
Sun Valley Pedro Point
b
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 116
DISTRICT DEMOGRAPHIC SUMMARY
Pacific Manor /
Fairmont
Sharp Park /
Eureka Square
Rockaway Beach /
Vallemar
Linda Mar /
Sun Valley Pedro Point Citywide
Population 14,600 4,600 3,400 15,000 900 38,500
Households 4,990 1,910 1,270 5,570 350 14,060
Avg HH Size 2.9 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.7
Median Age 40.7 43.7 46.5 46.8 47.4 43.9
Education: Bach Degree + 51% 55% 55% 47% 76% 51%
HHs Below Poverty Level 6% 7% 2% 2% 0% 4%
Median Household Income $146,500 $137,300 $160,300 $141,100 $200,000 $146,600 Average Household Income $181,200 $177,400 $220,500 $169,800 $285,400 $182,100 Median Home Value $1,024,600 $1,169,900 $1,211,400 $1,035,200 $1,348,400 $1,076,100 Owner Occupied Housing Units 64% 50% 85% 79% 68% 70%
Median Year Housing Unit Built 1967 1967 1961 1964 1966 1965 Median Year Moved into Unit 2010 2012 2003 2003 2010 2007 Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
b
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 117
Census Tract Neighborhood
Approximation:
Pacific Manor/Fairmont: 6027, 6028,6029
Sharp Park / Eureka Square: 6030
Rockaway Beach / Vallemar: 6031
Linda Mar / Sun Valley: 6033, 6034, 6032 (partial)
Pedro Point: 6032 (partial)
PACIFICA
CENSUS TRACTS
Sources:
ESRI BAO Online
6027
6028
6029
6030
6031
6032
6033
6034
b
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 118
CENSUS TRACT DATA
2020 CENSUS – POPULATION & HOUSEHOLD OVERVIEW
Approx.
Neighborhood Site 2020 Total
Population
2020 Total
Households
2020 Average
Household Size
2020 Total
Housing Units
2020 Population Density
(Pop per Square Mile)
Pacifica (City) 38,640 14,180 2.72 14,652 3,070.9
Manor / Edgemar 6027 6,080 1,949 3.11 1,990 8,728.1
Manor / Edgemar 6028 4,639 1,495 3.10 1,535 10,028.1
Manor / Edgemar 6029 3,958 1,596 2.46 1,682 7,531.9
Sharp Park 6030 4,597 1,935 2.36 2,047 3,362.8
Rockaway 6031 3,306 1,252 2.63 1,289 1,176.8
Pedro Point /
Linda Mar 6032 3,966 1,434 2.75 1,492 2,270.7
Linda Mar 6033 6,568 2,434 2.69 2,495 2,128.0
Linda Mar 6034 5,561 2,102 2.65 2,140 1,244.2
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
b
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 119
CENSUS TRACT DATA
2020 CENSUS – POPULATION BY AGE
Approx.
Neighborhood Site
Population:
<20 Years
Population:
20-44 Years
Population:
45-64 Years
Population
65+ Years
Population:
<20 Years
Population:
20-44 Years
Population:
45-64 Years
Population
65+ Years
Pacifica
(City) 8,104 12,236 11,179 7,144 21% 32% 29% 18%
Manor / Edgemar 6027 1,349 2,487 1,678 705 22% 40% 27% 11% Manor / Edgemar 6028 1,077 1,557 1,382 892 22% 32% 28% 18% Manor / Edgemar 6029 761 1,418 1,170 555 19% 36% 30% 14% Sharp Park 6030 721 1,805 1,103 698 17% 42% 25% 16%
Rockaway 6031 643 912 1,132 570 20% 28% 35% 18%
Pedro Point /
Linda Mar 6032 882 772 1,326 617 25% 21% 37% 17%
Linda Mar 6033 841 2,007 1,886 1,404 14% 33% 31% 23%
Linda Mar 6034 1,594 1,292 1,502 1,703 26% 21% 25% 28%
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
b
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 120
CENSUS TRACT DATA
2016-2020 ACS – INCOME OVERVIEW
Approx. Neighborhood Site 2020 Median
Household Income
2020 Average
Household Income
2020 Households
Below the Poverty Level
(%)
Pacifica (City) $130,466 $147,900 4.15%
Manor / Edgemar 6027 $138,086 $147,238 5.63%
Manor / Edgemar 6028 $139,049 $148,639 5.38%
Manor / Edgemar 6029 $120,500 $131,027 8.29%
Sharp Park 6030 $123,208 $135,744 6.76%
Rockaway 6031 $154,156 $175,774 1.55%
Pedro Point / Linda Mar 6032 $127,806 $157,254 1.37%
Linda Mar 6033 $136,056 $160,585 1.25%
Linda Mar 6034 $111,450 $136,234 2.84%
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
b
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 121
CENSUS TRACT DATA
2016-2020 ACS – HOUSING UNIT OVERVIEW
Approx.
Neighborhood
2020 Total
Housing Units
2020 Median Year
Structure Built
(Total Housing
Units)
2020 Housing:
1 Detached Unit in
Structure (%)
2020 Owner
Households
2020 Renter
Households
2020 Total Vacant
HUs
Pacifica (City) 14,246 1965 73.60% 67% 30% 3%
Manor / Edgemar 6027 1,943 1968 67.22% 63% 36% 1%
Manor / Edgemar 6028 1,523 1967 78.92% 75% 25% 0%
Manor / Edgemar 6029 1,664 1963 58.59% 49% 45% 6%
Sharp Park 6030 1,962 1967 46.79% 46% 50% 4%
Rockaway 6031 1,145 1961 86.55% 79% 16% 4%
Pedro Point / Linda
Mar 6032 1,396 1958 87.18% 72% 22% 6%
Linda Mar 6033 2,428 1960 84.43% 79% 20% 1%
Linda Mar 6034 2,199 1969 83.67% 75% 23% 2%
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
b
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 122
CENSUS TRACT DATA
2016-2020 ACS – HOUSING TENURE OVERVIEW
Median Year
Householder
Moved in
Households by Year Householder Moved In:
1989/Earlier 1990 - 1999 2000 - 2009 2010 - 2014 2015 or Later Pacifica
(City) 2007 2,979
(23%)
1,935
(15%)
2,780
(22%)
1,484
(12%)
3,583
(28%)
Manor /
Edgemar 6027 2010 308 199 426 121 677
Manor /
Edgemar 6028 2010 351 137 267 286 409
Manor /
Edgemar 6029 2011 198 227 333 83 593
Sharp Park 6030 2012 304 188 301 178 612
Rockaway 6031 2003 245 201 314 104 161
Pedro Point
/ Linda Mar 6032 2004 388 141 343 141 261
Linda Mar 6033 2003 538 529 411 359 365
Linda Mar 6034 2003 647 313 385 212 519
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, 2022
b
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 123
PER ACRE POPULATION AND COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT COMPARISON BY DISTRICT
Pacifica Daly City South San
Francisco San Bruno Millbrae Half Moon Bay
Population Per Acre 5 22 11 13 11 3
Retail SF Per Acre 130 930 440 780 590 470
Shopping Center SF Per Acre 70 540 110 480 120 90
Office SF Per Acre 20 310 1,270 540 190 80
Industrial / Flex SF Per Acre 20 300 3,930 220 60 90
Commercial SF Per Acre 170 1,530 5,640 1,540 830 640
Hotel Rooms Per Acre 0.04 0.06 0.57 0.19 0.58 0.18
Source: ESRI Business Analyst Online, CoStar, 2022
b
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 124
PACIFICA MAJOR EMPLOYERS
Major Employers in Pacifica
Major Employer Type Employees
Pacifica School District Education 383
City of Pacifica Government 244
Safeway (3) Retail 262
Jefferson High School District Education 108
Oceana Market Retail 55
Ace Hardware Retail 14
Recology of the Coast Waste Management 37
Rite Aid (2) Retail 34
Ross Dress for Less Retail 31
North Coast County Water District Government 18
Source: City of Pacifica ACFR (FY2021)
b
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 125
WORKER INFLOW / OUTFLOW
CITY SEES SUBSTANTIAL NET OUTFLOW OF WORKERS COMMUTING TO OTHER COMMUNITIES Workers employed in the City
but living outside
Workers living & employed in
the City
Workers living in the City but
employed outside
Worker Inflow/Outflow (2019)
Workers Living & Working 1,627
Workers Coming (Inflow) 3,520
Workers Going (Outflow) 19,260
Net Inflow/Outflow - 15,740
Employment Ratio* 0.25
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Center for Economic
Studies (2019, accessed 2022)
Notes: *Employment Ratio = People employed
within City (living and working in City + those who
come into the City for work) / Employed population of
City (living and working in City + workers who live in
the City, but work outside of the City)
b
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 126
Outflow:
Where Pacifica Residents Commute To
City Count Percentage
San Francisco 7,480 35.8%
Pacifica 1,627 7.8%
South San Francisco 1,498 7.2%
San Mateo 777 3.7%
Daly City 675 3.2%
Burlingame 573 2.7%
San Jose 513 2.5%
Redwood City 503 2.4%
Oakland 476 2.3%
Palo Alto 372 1.8%
Other Locations 6,393 31%
Inflow:
Where Pacifica Workers Come From
City Count Percentage
Pacifica 1,627 31.6%
San Francisco 781 15.2%
Daly City 440 8.5%
South San Francisco 233 4.5%
San Bruno 169 3.3%
San Mateo 152 3.0%
San Jose 118 2.3%
Oakland 86 1.7%
Hayward 53 1.0%
Half Moon Bay 46 0.9%
Other Locations 1,442 28%
WORKER
DESTINATIONS &
ORIGINS
CITY OF PACIFICA
Workers who live in Pacifica primarily
work in San Francisco, Pacifica, South
San Francisco, San Mateo, and Daly
City.
Employees who work in Pacifica
primarily live in Pacifica, San Francisco,
Daly City, South San Francisco, and
San Bruno.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies, OnTheMap, 2019; accessed 2022 b
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 127
Workers Employed Within City
Sector Percentage
Accommodation and Food Services 17.3%
Educational Services 16.1%
Health Care and Social Assistance 14.3%
Retail Trade 12.4%
Construction 10.2%
Administration & Support, Waste Management
and Remediation 5.0%
Public Administration 4.5%
Other Services (excluding Public Administration) 4.4%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 4.0%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 3.1%
Manufacturing 2.9%
Finance and Insurance 1.8%
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 1.6%
Utilities 0.7%
Transportation and Warehousing 0.6%
Wholesale Trade 0.6%
Information 0.6%
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 0.1%
Management of Companies and Enterprises 0.0%
City Resident Employed Population
(Age 16+)
Sector Percentage
Health Care and Social Assistance 13.1%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 11.4%
Educational Services 10.2%
Accommodation and Food Services 9.6%
Retail Trade 8.5%
Construction 5.4%
Transportation and Warehousing 5.4%
Manufacturing 5.3%
Administration & Support, Waste Management
and Remediation 5.2%
Public Administration 4.6%
Information 4.4%
Other Services (excluding Public Administration) 3.5%
Finance and Insurance 3.4%
Wholesale Trade 2.9%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 2.2%
Management of Companies and Enterprises 1.7%
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 1.6%
Utilities 1.1%
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 0.6%
WORKER
OCCUPATIONS
CITY OF PACIFICA
Workers who live in Pacifica primarily
work in the Healthcare, Professional /
Scientific / Technical Services,
Educational Services, and
Accommodation / Food Service
Industries.
Employees who work in Pacifica
primarily work in the Accommodation
/ Food Service, Educational services,
Healthcare, and Retail Trade
industries.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies, OnTheMap, 2019; accessed 2022 “Industries in which City residents work” “Jobs in the City” b
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 128
B. GENERAL FUND REVENUE ANALYSIS
Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study
b
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 129
REVENUE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Pacifica receives ~71% of its General Fund revenue from taxes, of 2/3rds are property taxes and VLF, ~20% of its tax revenue from sales / cannabis taxes and balance from hotel and franchise taxes Sales Tax revenues have grown ~87% since 2012, or approx. 7% per year; Highest collections come from Restaurants / Hotels and Food / Drug, reflecting that modern retail resiliency is driven by essentials and experiences.
Highest percentage growth since 2012 in Building / Construction and Restaurants / Hotels. Growth in Building / Construction likely due to big jump in 2020 - 2022 related to pandemic-era renovation and construction (growth levels likely not sustainable moving forward).
Tax growth in past 5 years has been heavily weighted by County Pool allocations from growth in internet sales Property Tax revenues have grown ~45% since 2012, or approx. 4.2% per year; Assessed Value growth driven by high real estate values and mark-to-market reassessments for long-held properties. b
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 130
CITY TAX REVENUE OVERVIEW
FY2023
Budget
Property Taxes $ 15,181,300
Property Tax: VLF 5,922,400
Sales Tax 3,111,200
Cannabis Tax 825,000
Transient
Occupancy Tax 2,100,000
Utility Users Tax 1,905,600
Business License
Tax 516,600
Other Taxes 1,687,800
Total 31,249,900
Pacifica has faced budget deficits,
service reductions and inability to
fund specific projects in recent
years. The City needs to identify
opportunities that can spur
economic development and
increase revenues.
The majority of City tax revenue
comes from property taxes, with
only ~10% coming from sales taxes
and 7% from hotel TOT taxes
(much lower than state averages).
Property
Taxes
48%
Property
Tax: VLF
19%
Sales Tax
10%
Cannabis
Tax
3%
TOT
7%
Utility
Users Tax
6%
Business
License Tax
2%
Other
Taxes
5%
City of Pacifica:
FY2023 Budget - Tax Revenue
Source: City of Pacifica
b
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 131
GENERAL FUND REVENUE
Taxes
71%
Licenses &
Permits
3%
InterGovernmental
12%
Current
Service Chgs.
8%
Other
5%
General Fund Revenue Sources
2021 2021 % CAGR
(2012-2021)
Property taxes $15,087,028 48% 4.2%
Sales Taxes 2,848,681 9% 7.2%
Franchise Tax 1,706,107 5% 0.7%
Other Taxes 9,026,832 29% 13.0%
Motor vehicle in lieu -
unrestricted 2,643,981 8% -1.5%
Investment earnings 9,364 0% -32.8%
Miscellaneous 204,939 1% -8.8%
Transfers -250,000 -1%
Total Governmental
Activities $31,276,932 4.7%
Source: City of Pacifica
b
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 132
HISTORIC TAX REVENUES BY SOURCE
*CAGR is Compound Annual Growth Rate
Source: Pacifica 2021 ACFR
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 CAGR * Property Taxes $10,434,510 $10,701,810 $11,275,518 $12,200,335 $12,445,509 $12,679,059 $13,780,294 $14,731,311 $13,030,713 $15,087,028 4.2% Sales Taxes 1,519,978 1,588,277 1,686,593 1,754,568 1,983,930 2,374,505 2,350,478 2,611,801 2,570,334 2,848,681 7.2% Franchise Tax 1,595,929 1,617,727 1,668,382 1,697,972 1,736,620 1,748,266 1,722,343 1,661,717 1,647,467 1,706,107 0.7% Other Taxes 3,005,388 3,152,723 3,329,647 3,529,485 3,710,615 3,749,159 4,904,111 5,340,307 8,572,837 9,026,832 13.0% Motor vehicle in
lieu - unrestricted 3,039,393 2,923,573 3,164,873 3,320,316 3,543,953 3,731,337 3,973,622 4,199,391 4,253,924 2,643,981 -1.5% Investment
earnings 334,475 164,114 184,700 29,979 -44,457 743,630 151,887 254,481 341,064 9,364 -32.8% Miscellaneous 469,780 357,630 537,867 259,197 1,481,757 846,648 505,076 2,384,463 571,114 204,939 -8.8% Transfers 200,000 410,000 15,715 -150 939,559 818,500 98,343 272,500 80,000 -250,000 Total
Governmental
Activities
$ 2 0 , 5 9 9 , 4 5 3 $ 2 0 , 9 1 5 , 8 5 4 $ 2 1 , 8 6 3 , 2 9 5 $ 2 2 , 7 9 1 , 7 0 2 $ 2 5 , 7 9 7 , 4 8 6 $ 2 6 , 6 9 1 , 1 0 4 $ 2 7 , 4 8 6 , 1 5 4 $ 3 1 , 4 5 5 , 9 7 1 $ 3 1 , 0 6 7 , 4 5 3 $ 3 1 , 2 7 6 , 9 3 2 4.7% b
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 133
RETAIL SALES TRENDS
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Sales Growth
from 2016 Baseline
Pacifica Half Moon Bay
San Mateo County
Pacifica has seen steady sales growth since
2016 of approx. 3.8% annually on average.
While the Covid-19 pandemic led to a
~13% drop in sales tax revenues in 2020,
Pacifica has recovered. Also worth noting
that the City was not as heavily impacted
as Half Moon Bay or San Mateo County.
Source: California Department of Finance
b
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 134
TAXABLE SALES BY CATEGORY
LARGEST CATEGORIES ARE EATING / DRINKING & FOOD STORES
$-
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
$250,000,000
$300,000,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020*
Taxable Sales By Category
Eating & Drinking Places Food Stores Service Stations Building Materials Auto Dealers & Supplies Other Retail Stores All Other Outlets 2020* %
Eating & Drinking Places $45,853,000 19%
Food Stores $30,462,000 12%
Service Stations $29,641,000 12%
Building Materials $5,955,000 2%
Auto Dealers & Supplies $4,728,000 2%
Other Retail Stores $52,880,000 22%
All Other Outlets $75,620,000 31%
TOTAL $245,139,000
Source: City of Pacifica ACFR FY2020-21
b
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 135
SALES TAX REVENUE BY BUSINESS DISTRICT
STRONG GROWTH AT SHARP PARK AND PEDRO POINT
Pacific
Manor
32%
Sharp
Park
Rockawy 15%
14%
Linda Mar
28%
Pedro
Point
8%
Other
3%
FY2022 Sales Tax Revenue by District
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Sales Tax Growth Since 2013
Source: City of Pacifica, HdL
b
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 136
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX TRENDS
Pacifica collects a 12% transient occupancy
tax (TOT) on hotel room and short-term
rental stays.
TOT revenues fell slightly during the Covid19 pandemic, but are expected to reach $2.1 million in FY 2022-23.
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
2018-19
Actuals
2019-20
Actuals
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Amended
Budget
2022-23
Adopted
Budget
Transient Occupancy Tax
Source: City of Pacifica
b
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 137
PRINCIPAL PROPERTY TAXPAYERS
Property Taxpayer Land Use Taxable Assessed Value Percentage of Total City Taxable Assessed Value
FPA WC Lands End LLC Multifamily Residential $90,842,000 1.30% AIMCO Pacifica Park Apartments Multifamily Residential $57,039,000 0.82% GRI Fairmont LLC Shopping Center $39,250,000 0.56%
Linda Mar Shopping Center, LLP Shopping Center $38,446,000 0.55% Pacifica Villages LP Multifamily Residential $32,229,000 0.46% CRP/PSE Seaside Pacifica Owner Mobile Home Park $26,506,000 0.38% 2400 Skyline Blvd LLC Multifamily Residential $18,185,000 0.26% Bay Apartment Communities, Inc. Multifamily Residential $16,307,000 0.23% Upsky Lighthouse Hotel LLC Hotel $15,322,000 0.22%
LBN Properties LP Multifamily Residential $15,092,000 0.22% Source: City of Pacifica ACFR FY2020-21
b
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 138
ILLUSTRATIVE FISCAL IMPACT OF NEW DEVELOPMENT
To evaluate Pacifica economic opportunities, here is an illustration of incremental tax revenues potentially generated from various types of development on a typical 1-acre parcel:
10,000 SF
Commercial
Services
10,000 SF
Retail
10,000 SF
Restaurant
50-unit
Multifamily
Housing
Mixed Use
40-units &
5,000 SF
60-room
Upscale Hotel
Property Taxes
+ VLF in-lieu $10,000 $10,000 $15,000 $65,000 $55,000 $50,000 Direct Sales &
Use Taxes $25,000 $50,000 $75,000 $25,000
Indirect Sales &
Use Taxes $20,000 $15,000 $35,000
Hotel
TOT $300,000
Annual
General Fund
Revenues
$35,000 $60,000 $90,000 $85,000 $95,000 $385,000
b
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 139
C. MARKET ANALYSIS
Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study
b
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 140
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE OVERVIEW
CITY OF PACIFICA
Retail Office Industrial Multifamily
Major Shopping Centers include:
• Linda Mar Shopping Center,
a 168k+ SF community
center featuring Safeway,
Ross Dress for Less, Rite
Aid
• Fairmont Shopping Center, a
120k+ SF neighborhood
center featuring Safeway,
Rite Aid
• Eureka Square, a 93k+ SF
neighborhood center
featuring smaller retail
shops / restaurants
• Several other neighborhood
and strip retail centers
Limited office development; Major
office properties include:
• 930 Oddstad Rd, ~20k SF office
occupied by Laguna Salada
School District
• 2307 Palmetto Ave, ~12k SF
office condo occupied by small
professional tenants
• 1305 Palmetto Ave, 12k SF office
occupied by small professional /
retail tenants
Limited industrial development;
major industrial properties include:
• Pacifica Commerce Center,
~49k SF light warehouse /
industrial park space, occupied
by small industrial and retail
tenants
• 1080 Palmetto Ave, ~26k SF
manufacturing space, occupied
by food manufacturing / bakery
• 325 Reina Del Mar Ave, ~13k SF
service industrial space
occupied by Blue Sky Taxi
Larger apartment complexes
include:
• 100 Esplanade Ave, Oceanaire
Apartment Homes, 260 units
built in 1974
• 265 Gateway Drive, eaves
Pacifica, 220 units built 1971
• 300 Palmetto Ave, Seacliff
Apartments, 132 units built in
1972
Source: CoStar (Accessed June/July 2022)
b
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 141
COAST HIGHWAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Traffic count estimates for a section of CA-1 just south of Pedro Point shows an average daily traffic volume (ADV) of ~21,000 cars total (~51% southbound traffic).
The highest days for travel along the route are Friday (24.1k ADV) and Saturday (23.6k ADV), and the lowest are Wednesdays (19k ADV)
Travel tends to peak during the day between 12pm - 6pm, reaching ~2,000 cars / hour on Saturdays and Sundays between 12pm and 2pm.
Northbound traffic patterns are similar with more volume on weekday mornings
Pacifica sees a relatively high level of travel along Coast Highway, with an estimated 10,700 trips passing the City southbound (~91% of those trips are from travelers who live outside Pacifica).
Southbound Traffic Volume:
CA-1 South of Pedro Point
Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Sun
12am - 2am 47 41 41 44 52 73 67
2am - 4am 32 30 30 34 37 39 33
4am - 6am 83 80 77 81 83 59 42
6am - 8am 276 292 273 283 287 210 152
8am -10am 515 496 475 505 546 562 463
10am - 12pm 742 658 641 696 810 970 918
12pm - 2pm 848 758 745 803 968 1091 1078
2pm - 4pm 879 819 783 853 1025 1013 982
4pm - 6pm 835 829 788 844 995 843 773
6pm - 8pm 520 527 512 569 709 577 505
8pm - 10pm 259 266 269 308 404 339 277
10pm - 12am 113 110 114 140 212 184 122
TOTAL 10,298 9,812 9,496 10,320 12,256 11,920 10,824
Source: Placer.ai
b
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 142
TRAFFIC VISITOR DATA
According to Placer.ai mobile analytics data, visitors who travel through this point on CA-1 just south of
Pedro Point are overwhelming from home locations
outside of Pacifica: ~9% of travelers are from Pacifica, ~32% from Half Moon Bay area, ~12% from San
Francisco, ~4% from Daly City, ~2% from South San
Francisco, and the remainder from a wide variety of
other cities in the Bay Area and beyond.
Prior to / after traveling through the point on CA-1, some of the most common locations are restaurants /
hotels in Half Moon Bay and nearby beach / hiking
locations.
Top 20 Prior / Post Locations
1. Sam’s Chowder House, Half Moon Bay 11. Oceano Hotel, Half Moon Bay
2. Pacifica State Beach, Pacifica 12. The Ritz-Carlton, Half Moon Bay
3. Montara Mountain, Montara 13. Ross Dress For Less, Pacifica
4. Safeway (Linda Mar), Pacifica 14. Grocery Outlet Bargain Market, Pacifica
5. Half Moon Bay Harbor, Half Moon Bay 15. Poplar Beach, Half Moon Bay
6. Barbara’s Fish Trap, Half Moon Bay 16. Ketch Joanne, Half Moon Bay
7. James V. Fitzgerald Marine Reserve,
Moss Beach
17. Mezza Luna Restaurant, Half Moon
Bay
8. Half Moon Bay Brewing Company, Half
Moon Bay 18. Pillar Point Harbor, Half Moon Bay
9. San Francisco International Airport,
San Francisco 19. Moss Beach Distillery, Moss Beach
10. Montara State Beach, Montara 20. Half Moon Bay Golf Links, Half Moon Bay
Source: Placer.ai
b
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 143
FOG FEST PLACER.AI DATA
Placer.ai data was used to analyze Fog Fest visitors:
Approx. 36,100 visits from 31,500 visitors came to the Palmetto area on Fog Fest weekend in 2022, six times
the normal level of weekend visits and ~20% higher
than prior years.
These visitors have average household incomes of
$122,000, similar to income levels of typical weekend
visitors.
Median dwell time was ~80 minutes, approximately
50% longer than a typical weekend visit.
Most visits were from visitors with home locations in Pacifica and other Bay Area cities, with ~7% of visitor home locations greater than 50 miles away.
Visit Estimates Saturday Sunday Total
Typical Weekend (2022) 3,400 2,900 6,300
Fog Fest 2022 20,000 16,100 36,100
Fog Fest 2019 16,900 12,200 29,100
Fog Fest 2018 15,700 13,800 29,500
Fog Fest 2017 18,800 13,200 32,000
Fog Fest 2022: Visits by City of Home Origin
City % City %
Pacifica 19% San Pablo 2%
San Francisco 16% San Mateo 2%
Daly City 8% Redwood City 2%
S. San Francisco 5% Oakland 2%
San Bruno 4% Sacramento 1%
Source: Placer.ai San Jose 3% Fremont 1%
b
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 144
SHARP PARK GOLF COURSE PLACER.AI DATA
Placer.ai data was used to analyze visitors to the Sharp Park Golf Course who spent at least one hour at the
location:
Approx. 66,100 visits from 26,100 visitors came to the Sharp Park Golf Course over the past year.
Visits peak in May / June; peak day is Tuesday, followed by Friday – Sunday; peak time is noon, with 48% of visits
occurring between 10am and 3pm.
Visitors have average household incomes of $138,000.
Most visits were from visitors with home locations in San Francisco, Pacifica, and other nearby cities, with ~10% of visitor home locations greater than 50 miles away.
Sharp Park Golf Course: Visits by City of Home Origin
City % City %
San Francisco 32% South San Francisco 2%
Pacifica 24% Burlingame 2%
San Mateo 6% San Jose 2%
Daly City 3% Half Moon Bay 2%
Belmont 3% Rocklin 1%
Source: Placer.ai; data filtered for visitors who stay for greater than one hour b
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 145
HOTEL PLACER.AI DATA
Placer.ai data was used to analyze overnight visitors to the hotels in Pacifica over the past year. According to this data, the Rockaway Beach Plaza area saw 122,400 overnight visits over the past year; these visits were split fairly evenly between the Fairfield Inn, Pacifica Lighthouse Wyndham, and Inn at Rockaway. The Pacifica Beach Hotel saw ~43,000
visits.
Visits peak in July; peak day is Friday, with ~57% of visits occurring Friday - Sunday.
Approx. 65% of visits are from visitors >30 miles away, and 79% of visits are from California visitors.
Fairfield Inn draws a higher percentage of visits from longer distances: ~52% of visits from visitors >250 miles away, compared to 27% for Rockaway Beach Plaza overall.
Visitors to the Rockaway hotel area have average household incomes of $112,000.
Source: Placer.ai; data filtered for visitors who stay for greater than 2.5 hours between 1am and 6am to assess overnight visits Rockaway Beach Plaza: Overnight Visits by Home City
City % City %
California Cities
Pacifica 9% Millbrae 3%
San Francisco 5% Hayward 2%
Daly City 4% S. San Francisco 2%
San Jose 3% Stockton 2%
Sacramento 3% El Centro 2%
Visitors from Other States
Nevada (Reno, Las Vegas,
Carson City) 3% Colorado (Littleton, Denver, Co. Springs) 1% Texas (Houston, Austin,
DFW) 2% Oregon (Portland, Eugene) 1%
Washington (Seattle,
Vancouver, Bellevue) 2% New York (NYC, New Paltz 1%
Arizona (Phoenix,
Scottsdale) 1% Georgia (Atlanta suburbs) 1%
b
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 146
PACIFICA
MAJOR SHOPPING
CENTERS WITHIN
5-MILE RADIUS
Sources:
ESRI Business Analyst Online
CoStar (Accessed June/July 2022)
5-Mile Radius
Regional Mall
Power / Outlet Centers
Community Centers
Neighborhood Centers
~12.96 million SF Shopping Center Inventory
in San Mateo County
~769,700 2022 San Mateo County
Population
~16.8 SF per
capita
Shopping Center SF per
capita in San Mateo
County
~15.2 SF per
capita City of Pacifica
Shops at Tanforan
JCPenney, Target, PETCO
1.12 million SF
Serramonte Center
Macy’s, Target, Dick’s Sporting Goods
1.15 million SF
Linda Mar Shopping Center
Safeway, Ross Dress For Less, Rite Aid
168k SF
Pedro Point Shopping Center
Grocery Outlet
32.5k SF
Eureka Square
Oceana Market, Plato’s Closet
93.6k SF
Fairmont Shopping Center
Safeway, Rite Aid
120k SF
280 Metro Center
Home Depot, Best Buy, Marshalls
342k SF
Westlake Shopping Center
Home Depot, Safeway, Burlington, Target
693k SF
San Bruno Towne Center
Lowe’s, Lucky, Marshalls
342k SF
b
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 147
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Shopping Center Visitor Performance:
Comparison to Pre-Covid Baseline
Fairmont Shopping Center Pacific Manor Shopping Center
Eureka Shopping Center Linda Mar Shopping Center
Pedro Point Shopping Center
PACIFICA
SHOPPING
CENTER VISITOR
PERFORMANCE
Sources:
Placer.ai (Accessed June/July 2022)
Median
Weekly
Visits
July % Chng.
Pre-Covid
Baseline
Fairmont
Shopping Center 29,800 + 1%
Eureka
Shopping Center 9,200 + 43%
Pacific Manor
Shopping Center 16,800 + 68%
Linda Mar
Shopping Center 40,500 + 12%
Pedro Point
Shopping Center 16,400 + 23%
b
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 148
PACIFICA
RESIDENTS
RETAIL SUPPLY &
DEMAND
Sources:
Placer.ai (Accessed July/August 2022)
As expected for a small
community, Pacifica has significant
retail leakage in many categories:
Demand Supply Surplus/Leakage
Auto & Fuel $ 263,900,000 $ 30,800,000 ($233,100,000) -88% Home Furnishings,
Hardware, Garden 76,100,000 13,200,000 ($62,900,000) -83% Food and Drugs 166,700,000 89,900,000 ($76,800,000) -46% E-Commerce 169,600,000 5,800,000 ($163,800,000) -97%
Consumer Goods 184,700,000 99,600,000 ($85,100,000) -46% Restaurants 68,500,000 65,400,000 ($3,100,000) -5%
Other 25,700,000 10,200,000 ($15,500,000) -60%
Total $ 955,100,000 $ 314,900,000 ($640,200,000) -67%
b
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 149
PACIFICA
RESIDENTS
TOP VISITED
PLACES –
PLACER.AI
Sources:
Placer.ai (Accessed December 2022)
Shopping Centers
Location City %
Serramonte Center Daly City 74%
Linda Mar Shopping Center Pacifica 61%
Serra Shopping Center Colma 50%
Pacific Manor Shopping Center Pacifica 48%
280 Metro Center Colma 47%
Fairmont Shopping Center Pacifica 47%
The Shops at Tanforan San Bruno 44%
Pedro Point Shopping Center Pacifica 43%
Westlake Shopping Center Daly City 42%
Rockaway Beach Plaza Pacifica 42%
Grocery Stores
Location City %
Safeway (Linda Mar SC) Pacifica 44%
Safeway (Manor Plaza) Pacifica 33%
Safeway (Hickey Blvd) Pacifica 33%
Grocery Outlet Bargain
Market Pacifica 29%
Oceana Market Pacifica 21%
Safeway South San Francisco 17%
Trader Joe's South San Francisco 14%
Sun Valley Fine Food Pacifica 13%
99 Ranch Market Daly City 12%
Seafood City South San Francisco 12%
Home Improvement / Home Furnishings
Location City %
The Home Depot Colma 26%
Lowe's San Bruno 14%
Linda Mar Ace Home Center Pacifica 11%
Bed Bath & Beyond Daly City 9%
The Home Depot Daly City 9%
Cost Plus World Market Daly City 8%
Pacific Manor Hardware Pacifica 7%
The Home Depot Colma 7%
IKEA East Palo Alto 7%
Living Spaces Millbrae 4%
Super Stores
Location City %
Target (Serramonte Center) Daly City 45%
Costco Wholesale (El Camino) So. San Francisco 39%
Target Colma 33%
Costco Wholesale (Airport Blvd) So. San Francisco 23%
Target San Bruno 15%
Costco Wholesale (Dubuque Ave) So. San Francisco 9%
b
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 150
PACIFICA
RESIDENTS
TOP VISITED
PLACES –
PLACER.AI
Sources:
Placer.ai (Accessed December 2022)
Shops (Select Categories)
Location City %
Dollar Tree Pacifica 22%
Michaels Colma 19%
Pet Food Express Pacifica 17%
PetSmart Daly City 15%
Nor Cal Surf Shop Pacifica 11%
Party City Daly City 9%
Florey's Book Co. Pacifica 6%
Dollar Tree S San Francisco 5%
Manor Music Pacifica 5%
Tons of Bubbles Pacifica 4%
Pharmacy
Location City %
Rite Aid Pacifica 30%
Walgreens Pacifica 28%
Rite Aid Pacifica 11%
CVS Daly City 7%
CVS San Bruno 3%
Walgreens So. San Francisco 2%
Walgreens Daly City 2%
Walgreens Millbrae 2%
Rite Aid Half Moon Bay 2%
CVS Burlingame 2%
Bars & Pubs
Location City %
The Longboard Margarita Bar Pacifica 12%
Pacifica Brewery Pacifica 9%
Half Moon Bay Brewing Company Half Moon Bay 6%
Winters Tavern Pacifica 6%
Humble Sea Brewing Co. Pacifica 6%
Moose Lodge Pacifica 6%
Grape In The Fog A Pacifica 5%
Old Princeton Landing Half Moon Bay 3%
Pedro Point Brewing Pacifica 2%
Fiddlers Green, Millbrae Millbrae 2%
Restaurants
Location City %
Original Joe's Westlake Daly City 15%
La Playa Pacifica 12%
Sizzler Colma 9%
Grand HotPot Pacifica 9%
Chevys Fresh Mex So. San Francisco 9%
Taqueria la Mordida Pacifica 9%
Moonraker Restaurant Pacifica 9%
Beach Monkey Organic Café Pacifica 8%
Taqueria El Gran Amigo Pacifica 8%
Black Bear Diner Colma 8%
b
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 151
PACIFICA
RESIDENTS
TOP VISITED
PLACES –
PLACER.AI
Sources:
Placer.ai (Accessed December 2022)
Hotels / Casinos (Local)
Location City %
Sea Breeze Motel Pacifica 18%
Pacifica Lighthouse, Trademark
Collection by Wyndham Pacifica 11%
Pacifica Beach Hotel Pacifica 11%
Lucky Chances Casino Colma 5%
Fairfield Inn Pacifica 4%
Artichoke Joe's Casino San Bruno 4%
Graton Resort and Casino Rohnert Park 3%
Inn at Rockaway Pacifica 2%
Hyatt Regency Burlingame 2%
The Ritz-Carlton Half Moon Bay 2%
Attractions (Local)
Location City %
Sea Bowl Pacifica 15%
Chase Center San Francisco 9%
Sharp Park Golf Course Pacifica 9%
Pacifica Fog Fest Pacifica 8%
Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk Santa Cruz 8%
Classic Bowling Center Daly City 7%
California's Great America Santa Clara 7%
Pacifica Community Center Pacifica 6%
Maker Faire San Mateo 5%
Jean Brink Pool Pacifica 5%
Theaters & Music Venues
Location City %
Century 20 Daly City Daly City 20%
Century 10 Theatre San Bruno 9%
Century at Tanforan and XD San Bruno 8%
Century Theatres San Bruno 7%
Century Theatres Daly City 6%
Terra Nova Theater Pacifica 5%
Century Theatres San Mateo 3%
Warfield Theatre San Francisco 3%
Orpheum Theatre San Francisco 2%
Pacifica Spindrift Players Pacifica 2%
Fitness
Location City %
Pacifica Athletic Center Pacifica 10%
Crunch Fitness Daly City 8%
24 Hour Fitness Pacifica 7%
Anytime Fitness Pacifica 7%
Orangetheory Fitness Pacifica 7%
Ocean Yoga Pacifica 3%
iLoveKickboxing Pacifica 3%
24 Hour Fitness Daly City 2%
Training For Warriors Pacifica 2%
Terra Nova Fitness Pacifica 2%
b
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 152
RETAIL MARKET HISTORY
CITY OF PACIFICA
Year Inventory SF Vacant SF Total Vacant Percent
% Total
Net Absorption
SF Total
Market
Rent
2022 YTD 1,009,317 28,526 2.8% (6,638) $28.91
2021 1,009,317 21,888 2.2% 8,065 $29.78
2020 1,009,317 29,953 3.0% (12,027) $30.12
2019 1,006,213 14,822 1.5% 1,465 $30.13
2018 1,002,013 12,087 1.2% 11,865 $29.15
2017 1,001,401 23,340 2.3% (8,564) $28.33
2016 1,001,401 14,776 1.5% 33,631 $26.98
2015 1,001,401 48,407 4.8% (38,034) $25.93
2014 1,010,901 19,873 2.0% 27,432 $24.57
2013 1,007,801 44,205 4.4% (656) $23.27
2012 1,007,801 43,549 4.3% 798 $22.40
Source: CoStar (Accessed October 2022)
City retail inventory has remained virtually unchanged over the past 10 years at 1 million SF, with vacancy at 2.8% and annual market rents at $29 psf. 0%
2%
4%
6%
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 Vacancy Rate
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 Market Rent
b
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 153
RETAIL MARKET HISTORY
PENINSULA COASTLINE SUBMARKET
Year Inventory SF Vacant SF Total Vacant Percent
% Total
Net Absorption
SF Total
NNN Rent
Overall
2022 YTD 3,093,524 44,584 1.4% (3,633) $39.43
2021 3,092,724 40,951 1.3% 3,828 $34.93
2020 3,092,724 44,779 1.4% (11,757) $36.31
2019 3,089,620 29,918 1.0% 708 $28.98
2018 3,085,420 26,426 0.9% 32,850 $61.80
2017 3,075,696 49,552 1.6% (15,592) $48.69
2016 3,075,696 33,960 1.1% 40,372 $26.69
2015 3,075,696 74,332 2.4% (38,421) $24.61
2014 3,085,196 45,411 1.5% 24,470 $25.05
2013 3,082,096 66,781 2.2% 578 $20.57
2012 3,083,777 69,040 2.2% (6,210) $20.51
2011 3,097,281 76,334 2.5% (13,438) $21.51
2010 3,097,281 62,896 2.0% (6,815) $24.85
2009 3,104,371 63,171 2.0% 829 $29.45
2008 3,079,290 38,919 1.3% 27,190 $22.70
Source: CoStar (Accessed June/July 2022)
Note: Costar defines Triple Net (NNN) as “a lease where the tenant is responsible for all expenses associated with their proportional share of occupancy of the building, except long-lived structural components and management charges.” 0%
2%
4%
6%
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 Vacancy Rate
$0
$20
$40
$60
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 NNN Rent
b
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 154
Year Inventory SF Vacant SF Total Vacant Percent
% Total
Net Absorption
SF Total
Base Rent
Overall
2022 YTD 173,790 4,363 2.5% (949) $42.41
2021 173,790 3,414 2.0% (2,214) $42.89
2020 173,790 1,200 0.7% - $43.84
2019 173,790 1,200 0.7% 2,282 $51.80
2018 173,790 3,482 2.0% (782) $49.39
2017 173,790 2,700 1.6% 1,085 $49.52
2016 173,790 3,785 2.2% 165 $48.09
2015 173,790 3,950 2.3% 2,414 $46.28
2014 173,790 6,364 3.7% 2,703 $40.55
2013 173,790 9,067 5.2% 19,983 $34.45
2012 173,790 29,050 16.7% (4,950) $31.82
Source: CoStar (Accessed October 2022)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 Vacancy Rate
OFFICE MARKET HISTORY
CITY OF PACIFICA
City office inventory has remained unchanged over the past 10 years at ~174k SF, with current vacancy at ~2.5% and annual market rents at ~$42 psf. $0
$20
$40
$60
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 Market Rent
b
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 155
OFFICE MARKET HISTORY
PENINSULA COASTLINE SUBMARKET
Year Inventory SF Vacant SF Total Vacant Percent
% Total
Net Absorption
SF Total
Base Rent
Overall
2022 YTD 665,218 34,335 5.2% (2,268) $32.20
2021 665,218 32,067 4.8% (4,374) $31.01
2020 665,218 27,693 4.2% (5,047) $25.90
2019 665,218 22,646 3.4% 17,087 $26.30
2018 667,594 42,109 6.3% (9,271) $26.31
2017 662,352 27,596 4.2% 15,151 $27.25
2016 663,773 44,168 6.7% 8,176 $28.12
2015 663,773 52,344 7.9% 390 $26.18
2014 665,773 54,734 8.2% (10,475) $24.57
2013 662,150 40,636 6.1% 7,050 $21.63
2012 662,150 47,686 7.2% 3,506 $25.74
2011 662,150 51,192 7.7% (7,206) $29.97
2010 662,150 43,986 6.6% 8,103 $24.47
2009 660,312 50,251 7.6% (4,020) $26.28
2008 660,312 46,231 7.0% (76) 26.33
Source: CoStar (Accessed June/July 2022)
Note: Costar defines Full Service / Gross Rent as “a rental rate that includes normal building standard services which are provided and paid by the landlord.”
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 Vacancy Rate
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 Base Rent
b
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 156
MULTIFAMILY MARKET HISTORY
CITY OF PACIFICA
Year Inventory
Units Vacant Units Vacancy Percent
Net
Absorption
(Units)
Asking Rent
(Unit/Mo.)
Asking Rent
(SF/Mo.)
2022 YTD 1,775 67 3.8% (2) $2,777 $3.69
2021 1,775 65 3.7% 42 $2,627 $3.49
2020 1,775 106 6.0% (57) $2,480 $3.29
2019 1,775 49 2.8% 22 $2,702 $3.59
2018 1,775 71 4.0% 27 $2,648 $3.52
2017 1,775 98 5.5% (26) $2,500 $3.32
2016 1,795 92 5.1% (23) $2,557 $3.40
2015 1,827 100 5.5% (30) $2,500 $3.32
2014 1,827 70 3.8% (2) $2,274 $3.02
2013 1,827 69 3.8% 13 $2,173 $2.89
2012 1,827 82 4.5% 32 $2,035 $2.70
Source: CoStar (Accessed October 2022)
Note: Costar defines Asking Rent as “average monthly amount the lessor is asking for in order to lease their building/space/land.” Analytic filters exclude senior / student / military / corporation / vacation housing / co-ops /manufactured housing; limits search to buildings with 5+ units; and Market / Market Affordable rent types. 0%
5%
10%
15%
2022 YTD
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021 Vacancy Rate
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
2022
YTD
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020
Asking Rent
City multifamily inventory has declined by ~52 units over the past 10 years, with current vacancy at ~3.8% and monthly asking rents steadily increasing to $2,777 per unit.
b
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 157
FOR-SALE HOUSING MARKET HISTORY CONTEXT
Source: CRMLS (Accessed June/July 2022)
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$1,600,000
$1,800,000
$2,000,000
Jan-08
Nov-08
Sep-09
Jul-10
May-11
Mar-12
Jan-13
Nov-13
Sep-14
Jul-15
May-16
Mar-17
Jan-18
Nov-18
Sep-19
Jul-20
May-21
Mar-22
Median Home Sale Price
Rolling 12-Month Average
Pacifica San Mateo County
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 Jan-08
Sep-08
May-09
Jan-10
Sep-10
May-11
Jan-12
Sep-12
May-13
Jan-14
Sep-14
May-15
Jan-16
Sep-16
May-17
Jan-18
Sep-18
May-19
Jan-20
Sep-20
May-21
Jan-22
Inventory - Months Supply
12-Month Rolling Average
Pacifica San Mateo County
b
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 158
HOSPITALITY SUMMARY
Pacifica is within easy reach of San Francisco, and has the potential to accommodate hundreds of nightly
visitors at a much lower cost than SF hotels.
Pacifica has a limited inventory of hotel rooms within the City limits, totaling ~313 rooms (with one
proposed property of 108 rooms).
The San Francisco / San Mateo / Marin County
hospitality market is home to 55,600 rooms, with 12-
mo occupancy at 55% and 12-month ADR at $215.
The San Francisco Area* hospitality submarket
(excludes City of San Francisco, airport area, and cities of San Mateo / Redwood City) has ~4,300 rooms, with
12-mo occupancy at 67% and 12-mo ADR at $220.
Hotel Rooms Class Year Built /
Renovated
Fairfield Inn & Suites San Francisco
Pacifica 88 Upper Midscale 2022
Pacifica Beach Hotel 52 Upper Upscale 2000
Americas Best Value Inn 25 Economy 1990
Sea Breeze Motel 20 Midscale 1953
Pacifica Lighthouse Hotel Trademark 97 Upper Midscale 2006 Pacifica Motor Inn 31 Upper Midscale 2018
PROPOSED
Hampton Inn & Suites Pacifica 108 Upper Midscale 2024*
Source: CoStar, June / July 2022
Source: CoStar, accessed June/July 2022
Note: CoStar’s San Francisco Area Hospitality Submarket includes Marin County, coastal San Mateo County, Daly City, Brisbane, parts of San Francisco south of I-280, and parts of Woodside / Redwood City / Portola Valley b
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 159
HOSPITALITY
SUMMARY
SAN FRANCISCO / SAN
MATEO MARKET &
SAN FRANCISCO AREA
SUBMARKET (MARIN
COUNTY, DALY CITY,
PACIFICA, HALF MOON
BAY)
Sources:
CoStar (Accessed July/August 2022)
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022 12-Month ADR
Market Submarket
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022 12-Month Occupancy
Market Submarket
b
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 160
PACIFICA AREA – HOTEL PROPERTY SUMMARY
Property Name Property Address City Hotel Class Rooms Opened Bldg Class
Operation
Type
Mtg
Space Restaurant
Pacifica Beach Hotel 525 Crespi Dr Pacifica Upper Upscale 52 2003 B Franchise 300 No Fairfield Inn & Suites San Francisco Pacifica 500 Old County Rd Pacifica Upper Midscale 88 1999 C Independent 6,750 Yes Pacifica Lighthouse Hotel Trademark Collection by
Wyndham 101-195 Rockaway Beach Ave Pacifica Upper Midscale 97 1981 B Franchise No Pacifica Motor Inn 200 Rockaway Beach Ave Pacifica Upper Midscale 31 1986 C Independent 2,000 No Sea Breeze Motel 100-104 Rockaway Beach Ave Pacifica Midscale 20 1961 C Franchise 5,000 Yes Americas Best Value Inn San Francisco Pacifica 2160 Francisco Blvd Pacifica Economy 25 C Independent No Ocean View Inn 8425 Cabrillo Hwy Montara Luxury 9 C Yes Seal Cove Inn 221 Cypress Ave Moss Beach Luxury 10 C Independent No Harbor View Inn 51 Avenue Alhambra El Granada Upper Upscale 17 1985 C Independent No Oceano Inn 380 Capistrano Rd Princeton Upper Midscale 11 1986 C Independent No Beach House Half Moon Bay 4100 Cabrillo Hwy N Half Moon Bay Luxury 54 1996 B Independent Yes Oceano Hotel & Spa 240 Capistrano Rd Half Moon Bay Luxury 95 2008 B Franchise 1,750 No Mill Rose Inn 615 Mill St Half Moon Bay Luxury 6 1982 C Independent No Cypress Inn On Miramar Beach 407 Mirada Rd Half Moon Bay Luxury 18 2002 C Independent 1,800 No Ritz-Carlton Half Moon Bay 1 Miramontes Point Rd Half Moon Bay Luxury 261 2001 A Independent No Half Moon Bay Lodge 2400 S Cabrillo Hwy Half Moon Bay Upper Upscale 80 1976 C Franchise 120 Yes Nantucket Whale Inn 779 Main St Half Moon Bay Upper Upscale 7 2015 C Independent 3,600 No Landis Shores Oceanfront Inn 207-211 Mirada Rd Half Moon Bay Upper Upscale 8 C Independent 8,000 Yes Half Moon Bay Inn 401 Main St Half Moon Bay Upper Upscale 15 1932 C Independent Yes Zaballa House 324-328 Main St Half Moon Bay Upper Midscale 20 1985 C Independent No The Miramar Inn & Suites 3020 Cabrillo Hwy N Half Moon Bay Upper Midscale 27 1991 C Independent 160 No Coastside Inn 230 Cabrillo Hwy S Half Moon Bay Upper Midscale 52 1991 B No BW Signature Collection Camerons Inn 1400-1410 Cabrillo Hwy S Half Moon Bay Upper Midscale 46 2018 C Independent No San Benito House 356 Main St Half Moon Bay Upper Midscale 12 C Chain Mgmt 13,000 Yes Quality Inn Half Moon Bay 2930 Cabrillo Hwy N Half Moon Bay Midscale 54 1999 C Independent Yes Source: CoStar
b
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 161
D. STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH / SURVEY
Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study
b
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 162
OUTREACH AND SURVEY OVERVIEW
Virtual
Community
Workshop
Online Survey
Stakeholder
Outreach
Meetings
Community
Meeting
17+ participants in
virtual community
outreach meeting
in August 2022
167 respondents to
online survey in
August –
September 2022
12+ virtual / inperson meetings
with targeted
stakeholders
12+ participants at
community meeting
in November 2022
Kosmont worked with the City to conduct a variety of outreach efforts to solicit feedback from community members:
b
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 163
SURVEY RESULTS
OVERVIEW
The online survey conducted between August and September 2022 provided vital feedback that will help plan for Pacifica’s future. 167 surveys were submitted, with ~96% of responses coming from Pacifica residents. 53% of respondents have lived in Pacifica for over 20 years, and 63% of respondents were at least 55 years old.
Results show that respondents are open to a wide variety of new businesses / developments in the City’s business districts, and highly value restaurant / dining options, leisure / entertainment venues, and places to gather. Respondents also highly value improvements to mobility / walkability / bike-ability / transit, safety improvements, and traffic flow. Many responses emphasized the importance of better utilizing Pacifica’s unique character and coastal amenities to create vibrant, walkable, engaging commercial areas that can better serve Pacifica’s residents and attract visitors.
b
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 164
SURVEY RESULTS
CURRENT
CONDITIONS
17%
16%
6%
36%
19%
24%
31%
18%
21%
25%
50%
46%
60%
32%
38%
9%
8%
16%
11%
17%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Pacific Manor / Fairmont
Sharp Park / Eureka Square
Rockaway Beach / Vallemar
Linda Mar / Sun Valley
Pedro Point
How Often Do You Visit The Following Business Districts? Very Often Often Sometimes Never
52%
37%
19%
13%
8%
7%
5%
4%
30%
29%
27%
18%
18%
12%
11%
7%
16%
20%
50%
52%
48%
48%
45%
56%
2%
15%
4%
17%
26%
34%
39%
33%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Essentials (grocery, home improvement, etc.)
Fitness / recreation / surfing / hiking
Dining / restaurants
Shopping
Personal Services – hair salon, dry cleaner, carwash
Leisure / entertainment
Professional Services – healthcare, business services, banking Arts / education / cultural
Do You Visit Pacifica Business Districts for the following purposes? Very Frequently Frequently Sometimes Never
Survey responses show that the Linda
Mar / Sun Valley and Sharp Park / Eureka
Square business districts were the most
frequently visited areas, while the
Rockaway Beach / Vallemar business
district was the least frequently visited.
Survey respondents were most likely to
frequently visit the Pacifica business
districts to shop for essentials, for fitness
/ recreation / surfing / hiking, and for
dining / restaurants. Respondents were
least likely to frequently visit the City’s
business districts for arts / education /
cultural, leisure / entertainment, personal
services, and professional services.
b
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 165
SURVEY RESULTS
NEW DEVELOPMENT,
IMPROVEMENTS, AND
AMENITIES
43%
30%
21%
22%
21%
27%
9%
8%
4%
5%
12%
42%
34%
44%
46%
41%
26%
32%
24%
33%
29%
22%
11%
29%
32%
25%
31%
25%
44%
52%
44%
49%
37%
4%
7%
3%
7%
7%
23%
15%
15%
19%
16%
30%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Restaurants and dining options
Leisure and entertainment uses / venues
Shopping and other retailers
Places where people can gather (small / large groups)
Arts / cultural / educational
Housing options
Fitness / health / wellness
Personal services
Office (e.g. medical/professional/other)
Professional services
Hotel / hospitality
What type of new additional businesses / developments would you like to see in the business districts?
Extremely Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important at all 51%
45%
51%
30%
28%
30%
23%
21%
35%
38%
30%
43%
42%
36%
32%
34%
13%
15%
16%
21%
27%
30%
36%
34%
1%
2%
3%
6%
4%
4%
9%
11%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Mobility / walkability / bike - ability / transit
Safety
Traffic flow
Public art plazas, and walkways
Signage / wayfinding / lighting
Streetscape / design /built environment
Technological infrastructure
Parking infrastructure
Which improvements/amenities should the City focus on in the business districts?
Extremely Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important at all Respondents tend to value adding new
restaurant / dining options, leisure /
entertainment venues, and places where
people can gather to the business
districts. Adding housing was important
to over 50% of respondents.
Respondents also highly value improving
mobility / walkability / bike-ability /
transit, safety improvements, and traffic
flow.
b
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 166
SURVEY RESULTS
Survey results varied by the type of
respondent, offering insights into younger
residents, recent residents, and business
owners / commercial property owners.
Younger Residents
More likely to rank as “Very Important” or “Important”… Less likely to rank as “Very Important” or “Important”… •Restaurants and dining options
•Leisure and Entertainment uses /venues
•Fitness / health / wellness
•Mobility / walkability / bike-ability / transit
•Public art, plazas, and walkways
•Parking Infrastructure
•Traffic Flow
Recent Residents
More likely to rank as “Very Important” or “Important”… Less likely to rank as “Very Important” or “Important”… •Restaurants and dining options
•Fitness / health / wellness
•Places where people can gather
•Streetscape / design / built environment
•Public art, plazas, and walkways
•Mobility / Walkability / bike-ability / transit
•Technological infrastructure
•Housing options
•Office
•Professional services
•Traffic Flow
•Parking Infrastructure
•Safety
Business Owners / Commercial Property Owners / Investors / Developers More likely to rank as “Very Important” or “Important”… Less likely to rank as “Very Important” or “Important”… •All new development types
•Streetscape / design / built environment
•Public art, plazas, and walkways
•Signage / wayfinding / lighting
•Technological infrastructure
•Mobility / Walkability / bike-ability / transit
•Traffic flow
b
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 167
KEY THEMES FROM SURVEY RESPONSES
Which retail stores do you visit that
are not available in the City of
Pacifica?
What other business districts
do you like to visit in other
cities, and what makes them
desirable?
What are the most important priorities &
opportunities the City should focus on to
improve / revitalize Pacifica business districts?
Big Box: Target, Costco, Home Depot
Essentials: Trader Joe’s, Whole Foods,
Sprouts, Lunardi’s, Mollie Stones
Restaurants, high-end dining, pet stores,
coffee shops, bars, personal services,
medical services, entertainment
Burlingame, San Mateo, Half Moon
Bay, Millbrae, Serramonte,
Redwood City, San Francisco, Palo
Alto, San Carlos
Key words: variety, downtown,
walkable, bike connectivity,
outdoor dining, interesting,
pleasant, ambiance, hang-out vibe,
personality
Adding a variety of unique restaurants / shops /
hotels; events, activities, entertainment
More public spaces, walkability & bike-ability
Managing traffic and parking
Build off natural beauty, beaches
Need attractive area - improve cleanliness, signage,
facades
Streamline permitting process
b
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 168
QUOTES FROM SURVEY RESPONSES
Congruent design with the beach cottage theme to tie
Rockaway in with the rest of Pacifica. Trees! Trees!
We should focus on smart growth and
improving quality of life
Small, Coastal Town Feel
Beautification of buildings and streetscapes,
adding trees and places to sit, play and have
community activities outdoors
Activities - music/entertainment for public outdoor
Focus on Pacifica's natural beauty and potential for
engagement in outdoor activities
WALKABLE, WALKABLE, WALKABLE - easy access for
visitors to stroll, eat, enjoy the natural views and scenery Play up the uniqueness of each area of Pacifica
Outdoor dining has been a good addition - More of That! Revitalize signs and paint
Improve the safety and beautification of the pier
b
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 169
STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH
City Staff Business Owners / Managers Community Groups
Kevin Woodhouse
Yulia Carter
Christian Murdock
Lisa Petersen
Olga Munoz – 7.3.1 Designs Gallery
Matt Kosoy – Rosalind Bakery
Pam Winston – Successories
Holly Smalley – Lytt Cannabis
Beth Lemke – Grape in a Fog
Chrystelle Azcona - Kimco
Steven Wright – Rotary Club
Amber Porter – Rotary, Tri County Bank
Daisy Fong – EDC Volunteer
James Crowe – Chamber, Fog Festival
Archie Judan – Chamber of Commerce
Judy Heldberg – Historical Society
b
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 170
COMMENTS FROM COMMUNITY / STAKEHOLDERS
Kosmont participated in meetings with City staff, Councilmembers, business leaders, as well as a virtual meeting with local residents to get their input on opportunities and challenges facing the City and its neighborhoods:
City has historic “no growth” sentiment and Coastal Commission is used as mechanism to appeal projects Residents want many City services but don’t acknowledge need for development to help fund them Budget constraints have reduced City staff in building and planning department; use of contract planners/inspectors has been problematic as contractors are often too stringent/by the book City has charged low development impact fees
Developers have been unsuccessful in getting approvals at Quarry site Residents are frustrated with lack of success from prior economic studies Lack of adequate commercial signage at many shopping centers (i.e., Eureka, Manor and Rockaway) Too many cannabis stores; residents want Trader Joe’s, but trade area population is too small b
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 171
COMMUNITY / STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS (CONT’D)
Poor marketing by City and Chamber and consider joint effort with Half Moon Bay [also consider better slogan such as “Pacific-aah”, “everything starts here”] [businesses/art venues could benefit from social media] Fog Festival is major success story [consider more events to bring people together such as Dog Surfing, Sam’s Castle events, golf tournament, July 4th fireworks at the pier] Eliminate “can’t do attitude” and replace with “how to get to yes” Hotel use on Quarry site may be more acceptable than residential City infrastructure is poor and no funding is available Beach Blvd. hotel site is key catalyst for creating downtown feel for Palmetto Ave. New library / community center important
Create business incubator / “Shark Tank” event to encourage entrepreneurship b
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 172
COMMUNITY OUTREACH VIRTUAL MEETING #1
Kosmont conducted a virtual community outreach meeting on August 29th. The following key themes were expressed:
Amenities: Beaches / ocean views / hiking / culture / proximity to SF are a big asset, but need improvement to take advantage of it New Uses: City could use more restaurants / bars / entertainment; shopping centers / commercial areas need to be refreshed Downtown: Need an area that acts as a “downtown”, shopping / dining oriented toward residents and visitors, mixed use / walkable areas, more people in the City during the week (without disrupting community) Drawing visitors / regional tourists: Need to better capture the dollars of people who are coming to Pacifica – need more restaurants, bars, shops, events, entertainment; leveraging coastal areas for big revenue drivers (hotel, restaurants, bars) Transportation: More transit options needed; traffic, congestion, and circulation challenges Infrastructure: Some concerns about infrastructure supporting existing / new uses Business Challenges: Some existing businesses face City permitting challenges; most activity on weekends, hard to sustain a business
Events: Fog Fest is a big attraction, more events can serve residents as well as draw visitors b
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 173
COMMUNITY OUTREACH MEETING #2
Kosmont conducted a community outreach meeting on November 15th. The following key themes were expressed:
Beautification: Need better signage, lighting, tree planting, façade beautification, other activations Improving Main Street Quality: Palmetto area could use more engaging retail / restaurants in the area – unique walkable mix of local businesses, also needs a “bigger draw”; many Palmetto businesses close early, could use zoning to encourage businesses to stay open later
Coastal Opportunities: Coastal areas have good opportunity for boutique hotel, hotel revitalization, restaurants, open space, and related projects
Need for Balance: Balance new development targeting visitors and residents, but strive to keep “small town feel” Wayfinding / Signage: Need to help businesses with better signage, lack of freeway signage to identify business districts Events: Events should be used to increase activity, such as food trucks, markets; Chamber seems to have limited capacity to organize
Environmental / Infrastructure Concerns: Some expressed concern about sea level rise and other environmental challenges, as well as the cost of infrastructure / impact of construction feasibility Transportation: Electric charging stations could be a good amenity for shopping areas; poor transit to SF and beyond b
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STUDY – FINAL VERSION
KOSMONT COMPANIES | 174
DISCLAIMER
The analyses, projections, assumptions, rates of return, and any examples presented herein are for illustrative purposes and are not a guarantee of actual and/or future results. Project analyses are projections only. Actual results may differ from those expressed in this analysis, as results are difficult to predict as a function of market conditions, natural disasters, pandemics, significant economic impacts, legislation and administrative actions. b
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Pacifica Economic Opportunity Study (5256 : Economic List of Economic Opportunities Attachment 3
No. Opportunity Description Area Timing Pages
1 Use Business Matters newsletter to promote digital marketing & social media Citywide Short Term 20, 24 2 Promote events in districts (i.e., Sam’s Castle, Sanchez Adobe, Sanchez Art Center) Citywide Short Term 24 3 Staff to act as City ambassadors with property & business owners, get to Yes Citywide Medium Term 24 4 Coordinate regional marketing with Half Moon Bay Citywide Medium Term 24 5 Social events for cannabis customers will bring visitors from Bay Area region Citywide Medium Term 20, 24 6 Install EV charging in shopping districts to attract tourists for lunch or dinner Citywide Medium Term 20, 24 7 RHNA requirement for 1,900 housing units translates into AV and spending Citywide Medium Term 20 8 Future for retail centers in Pacifica lies in blended use, experiential centers Citywide Long Term 32 9 Capture share of 10,000 daily tourists traveling past/through Pacifica Citywide Long Term 20 10 Linda Mar Surplus Parking - Opp Site - Discuss residential blended use with Kimco Linda Mar Long Term 26, 79, 98, 99 11 SamTrans Park & Ride Lot - Opp Site - Discussions commercial opps with SamTrans Linda Mar Long Term 26, 79, 102, 103 12 Community Center Property - Opp Site - Retail, hotel, residential, community uses Linda Mar Long Term 26, 79, 104, 105 13 Park Mall Parcels - Opp Site - residential, commercial, blended uses, surplus land Linda Mar Long Term 26, 79, 100, 101 14 Manor Shopping Center signage and facade refurbishment needed Pacific Manor Medium Term 23, 25, 57 15 Work with CalTrans to add Coast Highway signage announcing Business district Pacific Manor Medium Term 25, 57 16 Provide hotels with monthly Pacifica Anchor and Coastside magazines Rockaway Short Term 20, 24 17 Promote new hotels to attract visitors Rockaway Short Term 20 18 Work with ownership to upgrade Lighthouse Hotel Facility Rockaway Medium Term 20, 25 19 E-bicycle rental facility in Rockaway, draw for visitors Rockaway Medium Term 22, 24 20 Quarry Site - Opp Site - Specific Plan to explore uses - visitor serving & residential Rockaway Long Term 20, 25, 70, 94, 95 21 Sea Bowl Site - Opp Site - consider parking for blended use, housing & commercial Rockaway Long Term 25, 96, 97 22 Discuss findings & benefits of Adopted Sharp Park Specific Plan with businesses Sharp Park Short Term 25, 93 23 Process Beach Blvd Site through State Surplus Lands Act process before marketing Sharp Park Short Term 25, 91 24 Beach Blvd - Opportunity Site - hotel, commercial, blended or community uses Sharp Park Medium Term 24, 63, 90, 91 25 More events on Palmetto Avenue (food trucks) to support business Sharp Park Medium Term 20, 24 26 Work with SF to expand activities & promotion of Sharp Park Golf Course Sharp Park Medium Term 20, 24, 25, 63 27 Consider July 4th Fireworks off Pier - day long events along Palmetto Avenue Sharp Park Medium Term 24 28 Palmetto Ave Parcels - Opportunity Site - suitable for commercial & residential Sharp Park Long Term 92, 93 29 Consider Developing Public Parking Lots to accommodate more visitors Sharp Park Long Term 93 30 Transform Palmetto Avenue in Sharp Park into a Downtown district Sharp Park Long Term 24, 63 Opportunity Sites in Bold, Timing: Short Term = 1-2 Years, Medium Term = 3-4 Years, Long Term = 5 Years or longer c
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Attachment 3 - List of Economic Opportunities (5256 : Economic Opportunities Study) Opportunity Site Revenue Estimates Attachment 4
Opp.
No*. Opportunity Description Area Ownership Page Acres Hotel Commercial Residential 10 Linda Mar Surplus Parking Area Linda Mar Private 98 1.9 X X $150,000 - $150,000 11 SamTrans Park & Ride Lot Linda Mar Public 102 2 X X $100,000 - $250,000 12 Community Center Property Linda Mar Public 104 5 X X X $100,000 - $250,000 13 Park Mall Opportunity Sites Linda Mar Private + Public 100 5.3 X X $100,000 - $100,000 20 Quarry Site (Flat Southern Portion) Rockaway Private 94 20 X $550,000 - $1,050,000 21 Sea Bowl Site (Unused Parking Area) Rockaway Private 96 2 X X $200,000 - $200,000 24 Beach Blvd Property Sharp Park Public 90 3.5 X X X $150,000 - $650,000 28 Palmetto Avenue (5 Parcels) Sharp Park Private 92 1.1 X X $100,000 - $100,000
40.8 $1,450,000 - $2,750,000
* Presented in the same order as they appear on the overall list of opportunities (1-30) in the Attachment 3 Annual Revenue Estimate
d
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Opportunity Site Revenue Estimates (5256 : Economic Opportunities Study) Economic Opportunities Timing List Attachment 5
No. Opportunity Description Area Timing Pages
1 Use Business Matters newsletter to promote digital marketing & social media Citywide Short Term 20, 24 2 Promote events in districts (i.e. Sam's Castle, Sanchez Adobe, Sanchez Art Center) Citywide Short Term 24 16 Provide hotels with monthly Pacifica Anchor and Coastside magazines Rockaway Short Term 20, 24 17 Promote new hotels to attract visitors Rockaway Short Term 20 22 Discuss findings & benefits of Adopted Sharp Park Specific Plan with businesses Sharp Park Short Term 25, 93 23 Process Beach Blvd Site through State Surplus Lands Act process before marketing Sharp Park Short Term 25, 91 3 Staff to act as City ambassadors with property & business owners, get to Yes Citywide Medium Term 24 4 Coordinate regional marketing with Half Moon Bay Citywide Medium Term 24 5 Social events for cannabis customers will bring visitors from Bay Area region Citywide Medium Term 20, 24 6 Install EV charging in shopping districts to attract tourists for lunch or dinner Citywide Medium Term 20, 24 7 RHNA requirement for 1,900 housing units translates into AV and spending Citywide Medium Term 20 14 Manor Shopping Center signage and facade refurbishment needed Pacific Manor Medium Term 23, 25, 57 15 Work with CalTrans to add Coast Highway signage announcing Business district Pacific Manor Medium Term 25, 57 18 Work with ownership to upgrade Lighthouse Hotel Facility Rockaway Medium Term 20, 25 19 E-bicycle rental facility in Rockaway, draw for visitors Rockaway Medium Term 22, 24 24 Beach Blvd - Opportunity Site - hotel, commercial, blended or community uses Sharp Park Medium Term 24, 63, 90, 91 25 More events on Palmetto Avenue (food trucks) to support business Sharp Park Medium Term 20, 24 26 Work with SF to expand activities & promotion of Sharp Park Golf Course Sharp Park Medium Term 20, 24, 25, 63 27 Consider July 4th Fireworks off Pier - day long events along Palmetto Avenue Sharp Park Medium Term 24 8 Future for retail centers in Pacifica lies in blended use, experiential centers Citywide Long Term 32 9 Capture share of 10,000 daily tourists traveling past/through Pacifica Citywide Long Term 20 10 Linda Mar Surplus Parking - Opp Site - Discuss residential blended use with Kimco Linda Mar Long Term 26, 79, 98, 99 11 SamTrans Park & Ride Lot - Opp Site - Discuss commercial opps with SamTrans Linda Mar Long Term 26, 79, 102, 103 12 Community Center Property - Opp Site - Retail, hotel, residential, community uses Linda Mar Long Term 26, 79, 104, 105 13 Park Mall Parcels - Opp Site - residential, commercial, blended uses, surplus land Linda Mar Long Term 26, 79, 100, 101 20 Quarry Site - Opp Site - Specific Plan to explore uses - visitor serving & residential Rockaway Long Term 20, 25, 70, 94, 95 21 Sea Bowl Site - Opp Site - consider parking for blended use, housing & commercial Rockaway Long Term 25, 96, 97 28 Palmetto Ave Parcels - Opportunity Site - suitable for commercial & residential Sharp Park Long Term 92, 93 29 Consider Developing Public Parking Lots to accommodate more visitors Sharp Park Long Term 93 30 Transform Palmetto Avenue in Sharp Park into a Downtown district Sharp Park Long Term 24, 63 Opportunity Sites in Bold, Timing: Short Term = 1-2 Years, Medium Term = 3-4 Years, Long Term = 5 Years or longer e
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Attachment 5 - Economic Opportunity Timing List (5256 : Economic Opportunities Study)
CITY OF PACIFICA
COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/23/2023
1 SUBJECT:
Approval of Disbursements for Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Move to approve attached lists of disbursements for 11/16/22 through 12/31/22.
STAFF CONTACT:
Lucy Xie, Deputy Finance Director
(650) 738-7395
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Staff has submitted the following disbursements for Council approval:
• Disbursements dated 11/16/22 through 11/30/22 are in the amount of $1,902,439.07 (Attachment 1).
• Disbursements dated 12/1/22 through 12/31/22 are in the amount of $3,002,366.54 (Attachment 2).
Future disbursement reports will be submitted at the first City Council Meeting of each month and will contain reports representing the previous month's disbursement.
FISCAL IMPACT:
These disbursements are within budgeted appropriations.
ORIGINATED BY:
Finance Department
ATTACHMENT LIST:
Attachment 1: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 11-16 to 11-30-22 (PDF) Attachment 2: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 12-1 to 12-31-22(PDF) 1 Packet Pg. 196
Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:35 Page: 1
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 11/16/22 - 11/30/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 62668 679.19 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00009 AT&T
1 62669 158.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03874 4LEAF INC 1 62670 293.85 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00094 ADAM-HILL COMPANY, THE 1 62671 69975.51 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04584 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC 1 62672 407.65 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00122 AIRGAS USA, LLC 1 62673 583.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04066 ALERT PEST CONTROL COMPANY INC 1 62674 106.74 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00136 ALHAMBRA 1 62675 3858.65 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04980 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 1 62676 271.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05556 AMERICAN DEBRIS BOX SERVICE INC. 1 62677 241.22 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04459 ARROWHEAD FORENSICS 1 62678 43.65 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00009 AT&T LONG DISTANCE 1 62679 100.55 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04666 B & D DONOR RECOGNITION 1 62680 2000.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05414 BEECHER ENGINEERING, INC. 1 62681 1286.97 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04880 BLADES GROUP, LLC 1 62682 2811.58 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00335 BLUE RIBBON SUPPLY COMPANY 1 62683 214.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00011 C.W.E.A. 1 62684 5460.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03814 CAPPSTONE, INC. 1 62685 53743.04 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02655 CAROLLO 1 62686 160.90 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00471 CARPENTER RIGGING & SUPPLY 1 62687 3969.77 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00507 CHILDCARE CAREERS 1 62688 107.02 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00510 CINTAS CORPORATION #464 1 62689 700.93 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02822 CITY AUTO SUPPLY 1 62690 2528.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05552 CIVICPLUS, LLC 1 62691 50.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00429 CLEARS
1 62692 27.37 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02168 COMCAST 1 62693 4573.50 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00595 COTTON, SHIRES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:35 Page: 2
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 11/16/22 - 11/30/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 62694 8090.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05341 CREATIVE DIGITAL AGENCY INC. 1 62695 484412.66 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03121 D.W. NICHOLSON CORPORTATION 1 62696 529.42 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00630 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION 1 62697 7267.01 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00025 DALY CITY/CITY OF 1 62698 50.31 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00672 DIAL GLASS AND WINDOW CO 1 62699 327.22 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02793 EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO., INC 1 62700 5355.36 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05683 ECE STEP 1 62701 77.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00758 EXPERIAN 1 62702 69.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03047 FASTRAK VIOLATION PROCESSING DEPARTMENT 1 62703 13175.41 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02767 FLYERS ENERGY, LLC 1 62704 4497.50 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03930 FREYER & LAURETA, INC. 1 62705 56901.72 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05220 GHIRARDELLI ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 62706 409.34 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00872 GRAINGER
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.a
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Attachment 1: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 11-16 to 11-30-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22) 1 62707 588.06 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00892 HACH COMPANY 1 62708 1315.30 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04999 IMAGE SOURCE 1 62709 2340.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02544 IN & OUT PLUMBING 1 62710 435.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03070 INNOVATIVE MECHANICAL INC. 1 62711 4937.50 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05688 JK SOUND, INC 1 62712 4560.81 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05470 JMI SOURCING LLC 1 62713 39.38 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01014 JOHN THE SIGN GUY LLC 1 62714 154.44 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05009 JOHN-THOMAS HANSON 1 62715 240.63 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05735 JOSEPH VARGAS 1 62716 300.78 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01070 LAURETTA PRINTING COMPANY 1 62717 450.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 LECHLEITNER, KYLE 1 62718 4948.44 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01095 LINDA MAR HARDWARE 1 62719 0.00 11/18/22 UNISSUED 11/18/22 01095 LINDA MAR HARDWARE Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:35 Page: 3
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 11/16/22 - 11/30/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 62720 437.50 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05733 LINH MUSFELT 1 62721 1043.22 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01142 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 1 62722 432.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05533 MCMILLAN ELECTRIC 1 62723 4164.56 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01164 MILLBRAE LOCK 1 62724 100.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01165 MILLER & O'BRIEN 1 62725 1290.28 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01183 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 62726 739.01 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04549 NAF SERVICES, INC. 1 62727 2174.04 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01194 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS, INC 1 62728 14776.40 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01206 NORTH COAST COUNTY WATER DIST. 1 62729 1459.21 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02486 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 1 62730 1615.40 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01217 OFFICE DEPOT 1 62731 91.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01239 PACIFIC FIRE SAFE 1 62732 158023.41 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01240 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. 1 62733 4569.16 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01244 PACIFIC NURSERIES 1 62734 7280.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01249 PACIFICA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1 62735 350.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 PANOFSKY, PETER 1 62736 2278.12 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00054 PAPE MACHINERY 1 62737 129.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 POWERS, MATTHEW 1 62738 1078.44 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01336 QUILL CORPORATION 1 62739 457.22 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01337 R & H WHOLESALE SUPPLY, INC. 1 62740 1580.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03115 RMI MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, INC. 1 62741 3440.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03306 ROBERT HALF MANAGEMENT RESOURCES 1 62742 75.60 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01402 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. 1 62743 1320.99 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00022 SAN MATEO COUNTY 1 62744 493.53 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00022 SAN MATEO COUNTY INFORMATION SERVICES 1 62745 195.62 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04211 SAN MATEO COUNTY RESOURCE CONSERVATION D Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:35 Page: 4
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 11/16/22 - 11/30/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.a
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Attachment 1: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 11-16 to 11-30-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22) 1 62746 3315.27 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02367 SCALES UNLIMITED 1 62747 16665.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04646 SCHAAF & WHEELER 1 62748 2044.92 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04860 SERRA YELLOW CAB 1 62749 741.59 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01461 SERRAMONTE FORD INC. 1 62750 740.96 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 SHEEDY, MATTHEW 1 62751 318.04 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 SOO, KIM 1 62752 105.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04176 SOUTH BAY PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING CONSORT 1 62753 97.29 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01550 STEWART CHEVROLET 1 62754 150.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 STRATTON, KIRK 1 62755 1477.64 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01587 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE 1 62756 275.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05108 TEN OVER STUDIO, INC. 1 62757 6310.50 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03785 THATCHER COMPANY INC 1 62758 250.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01615 TOM'S AUTO BODY & PAINT 1 62759 2582.34 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01637 TURF & INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT CO 1 62760 504.20 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04418 U.S. BANK EQUIPMENT FINANCING, INC. 1 62761 115.65 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01647 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY SPECIALISTS 1 62762 29.58 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01652 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1 62763 6980.53 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01656 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA, INC. 1 62764 3238.00 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02527 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 1 62765 262.18 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01812 US BANK EQUIPMENT FINANCE 1 62766 108.27 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03835 US FOODS, INC 1 62767 60.08 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01684 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 62768 241.38 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01673 VWR INTERNATIONAL 1 62769 2470.52 11/18/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02987 WESTERN STATES OIL CO. 1 62770 2466.28 11/21/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00022 SAN MATEO COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 1 62771 50000.00 11/22/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01250 PACIFICA COMMUNITY TELEVISION Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:35 Page: 5
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 11/16/22 - 11/30/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 62772 289407.85 11/22/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05495 W.E. LYONS CONSTRUCTION CO. 1 62773 5398.30 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00009 AT&T
1 62774 522.54 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00094 ADAM-HILL COMPANY, THE 1 62775 132.75 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04066 ALERT PEST CONTROL COMPANY INC 1 62776 291.32 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00138 ALL INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC. 1 62777 846.20 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02743 ALPINE MECHANICAL SERVICE COMPANY, INC. 1 62778 1449.81 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04980 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 1 62779 237.15 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03895 AMERICAN FIDELITY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE 1 62780 544.83 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00009 AT&T
1 62781 39.68 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04464 BADGE FRAME, INC. 1 62782 639.19 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00293 BEARING AGENCIES INC 1 62783 69.97 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 BRAUN, LUCIE 1 62784 1200.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00364 BRISBANE/CITY 0F 1 62785 4288.96 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02502 BURKE WILLIAMS AND SORENSEN LLP 1 62786 404.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00011 C.W.E.A. 1 62787 256.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00014 CALIFORNIA STATE OF 1 62788 4843.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01690 CALTEST ANALYTICAL LAB
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.a
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Attachment 1: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 11-16 to 11-30-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22) 1 62789 823.17 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00483 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 1 62790 1034.45 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00510 CINTAS CORPORATION #464 1 62791 300.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00300 CITY OF BELMONT 1 62792 82.42 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03246 COAST COUNTIES PETERBILT & COAST COUNTIE 1 62793 298.44 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02168 COMCAST 1 62794 169.02 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02168 COMCAST 1 62795 3184.68 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01374 CORE & MAIN 1 62796 1127.67 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04677 CORODATA RECORDS MANAGEMENT INC 1 62797 500.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 CORONA ARROYO, SANTIAGO Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:35 Page: 6
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 11/16/22 - 11/30/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 62798 55543.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00022 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 1 62799 555.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00023 CPRS
1 62800 10020.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05341 CREATIVE DIGITAL AGENCY INC. 1 62801 108.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04000 CRIME SCENE CLEANERS, INC. 1 62802 11298.45 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00611 CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 62803 1311.13 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00653 DELL MARKETING L.P. 1 62804 60.77 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00676 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 1 62805 55.91 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02614 DISH
1 62806 1883.86 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04354 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 62807 749.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04626 DPREP INC 1 62808 9594.45 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02130 DRYCO CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 62809 350.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04386 EDGEWORTH INTEGRATION LLC 1 62810 500.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 ESRICK, CLINT 1 62811 129.71 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05700 EVIDENT, INC. 1 62812 21240.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03006 FEHR PEERS 1 62813 52204.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05220 GHIRARDELLI ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 62814 1992.17 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00872 GRAINGER 1 62815 2102.03 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00875 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY #26577 1 62816 1084.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00892 HACH COMPANY 1 62817 4117.50 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00925 HF&H CONSULTANTS LLC 1 62818 1400.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05090 JOE LAWRENCE 1 62819 95.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05333 KASEYA US LLC 1 62820 143.76 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03700 KIMBALL MIDWEST 1 62821 9608.75 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05535 KOSMONT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 62822 470.31 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01070 LAURETTA PRINTING COMPANY 1 62823 26545.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05582 LUHDORFF AND SCALMANINI CONSULTING ENGIN Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:35 Page: 7
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 11/16/22 - 11/30/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 62824 295.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 MCINTURF, GREG 1 62825 167.80 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 MOORE, JANELLE 1 62826 591.21 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04549 NAF SERVICES, INC.
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.a
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Attachment 1: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 11-16 to 11-30-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22) 1 62827 1716.25 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04632 NICHOLS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, CHTD 1 62828 14381.44 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01206 NORTH COAST COUNTY WATER DIST. 1 62829 676.02 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01217 OFFICE DEPOT 1 62830 2065.30 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02027 OLIVER PACKAGING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1 62831 3663.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01238 PACIFIC ECORISK 1 62832 1576.04 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01297 PARS
1 62833 2200.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01300 PEPPER BROS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1 62834 21000.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02981 PRECISION TREE CARE 1 62835 177.87 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01317 PREFERRED ALLIANCE, INC. 1 62836 4581.72 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01329 PUMP REPAIR SERVICE CO., INC. 1 62837 447.97 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01336 QUILL CORPORATION 1 62838 583.35 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00042 R & S ERECTION NORTH PENINSULA INC. 1 62839 8481.22 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03281 REGIONAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES 1 62840 1230.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03115 RMI MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, INC. 1 62841 2760.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03306 ROBERT HALF MANAGEMENT RESOURCES 1 62842 2947.10 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00022 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLER 1 62843 70.43 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05197 SAN MATEO COUNTY MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTR 1 62844 8860.19 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04211 SAN MATEO COUNTY RESOURCE CONSERVATION D 1 62845 125.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00022 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF 1 62846 78.78 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02182 SERVICE PRESS, INC. 1 62847 302.38 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05465 SIGILLO SUPPLY, INC. 1 62848 250.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 SMITH, BRANDON 1 62849 5706.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01531 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, INC.
Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:35 Page: 8
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 11/16/22 - 11/30/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 62850 312.78 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01546 STERICYCLE 1 62851 183.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05542 STIRLING GOULET 1 62852 2000.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05736 SUZANNE BUCKLEY DUNCKEL 1 62853 134954.93 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01587 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE 1 62854 18132.25 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05692 TJC AND ASSOCIATES INC. 1 62855 652.67 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01636 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 1 62856 1000.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01657 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 1 62857 678.57 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01647 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY SPECIALISTS 1 62858 871.08 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01812 US BANK EQUIPMENT FINANCE 1 62859 6947.76 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03835 US FOODS, INC 1 62860 18.13 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03980 VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY 1 62861 1125.04 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01684 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 62862 85.50 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05163 WEX HEALTH, INC. 1 62863 378.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01722 WILSEY & HAM 1 62864 20736.95 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04832 WOODARD & CURRAN, INC. 1 62867 22500.75 11/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04608 TRI COUNTIES BANK 1 62930 242.76 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 1 62931 192.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 1 62932 50.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 62933 350.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.a
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Attachment 1: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 11-16 to 11-30-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22) 1 62934 562.66 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 62935 100.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 62936 110.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 62937 246.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01767 NPFBA
1 62938 930.60 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01758 PACIFICA FIREFIGHTERS UNION 1 62939 439.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01758 PACIFICA FIREFIGHTERS-LTD Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:35 Page: 9
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 11/16/22 - 11/30/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 62940 800.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01759 PACIFICA POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 1 62941 200.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01760 PACIFICA POLICE OFFICERS SAVINGS 1 62942 420.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01769 PACIFICA POLICE SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION 1 62943 1401.06 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01758 SMC FIREFIGHTERS IAFF Local 2400 1 62944 2662.00 11/25/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01764 TEAMSTERS LOCAL #856 BANK: 1 TOTAL # OF CHECKS: 213 FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT OF: $1902439.07 TOTAL # OF REISSUED CHECKS: 0 FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT OF:
TOTAL # OF ACH CHECKS: 0 FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT OF:
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.a
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Attachment 1: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 11-16 to 11-30-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22) Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 1
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 62868 775.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03817 AAA RESTAURANT FIRE CONTROL, INC. 1 62869 212.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04066 ALERT PEST CONTROL COMPANY INC 1 62870 1467.31 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02743 ALPINE MECHANICAL SERVICE COMPANY, INC. 1 62871 68.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04631 ALTA LANGUAGE SERVICES, INC. 1 62872 2762.55 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04980 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 1 62873 3500.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05737 ANDREW FROST 1 62874 74396.20 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05475 B.E.A.M. CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES, INC 1 62875 1800.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03634 BAY POWER LLC GENERATOR SYSTEM DESIGN AN 1 62876 7577.50 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05658 BSK ASSOCIATES 1 62877 12343.80 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02502 BURKE WILLIAMS AND SORENSEN LLP 1 62878 126.36 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 BUSTRIA, JASON 1 62879 214.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00011 C.W.E.A. 1 62880 100.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04173 CALED
1 62881 2932.24 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00507 CHILDCARE CAREERS 1 62882 865.12 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00510 CINTAS CORPORATION #464 1 62883 165.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05082 COLUMN, PBC 1 62884 804.24 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02168 COMCAST 1 62885 100.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03295 COMMISSION ON TEACHER CREDENTIALING 1 62886 3000.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02201 DISCOUNT PLUMBING, INC. 1 62887 469846.91 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02130 DRYCO CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 62888 1300.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04321 DUBOCE JANITORIAL SERVICES 1 62889 48229.38 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04377 ELK GROVE AUTO GROUP 1 62890 2000.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05493 ESPOSTO'S FINE FOODS DBA THE BONEYARD 1 62891 771.75 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03469 EVANTEC CORPORATION 1 62892 4990.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03331 EWERS ENGINEERING 1 62893 40.40 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03047 FASTRAK VIOLATION PROCESSING DEPARTMENT Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 2
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 62894 16.59 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00773 FEDEX
1 62895 9432.01 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02767 FLYERS ENERGY, LLC 1 62896 3275.50 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00870 GOVCONNECTION, INC. 1 62897 2577.97 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00872 GRAINGER 1 62898 46154.63 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04131 HDL SOFTWARE, LLC 1 62899 3401.19 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04859 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1 62900 10455.04 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04083 INTERNATIONAL DIOXCIDE, INC. 1 62901 1828.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04704 JAMES STANFIELD 1 62902 1671.94 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01055 KONE INC 1 62903 114.84 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01070 LAURETTA PRINTING COMPANY 1 62904 159.11 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01007 MATCO TOOLS 1 62905 2130.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05533 MCMILLAN ELECTRIC 1 62906 691.63 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01183 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT, INC.
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.b
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Attachment 2: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 12-1 to 12-31-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22) 1 62907 262.50 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01378 MUSCIO ELECTRIC 1 62908 572.73 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04549 NAF SERVICES, INC. 1 62909 553.37 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01230 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY, INC. 1 62910 1140.64 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01243 PACIFIC MANOR HARDWARE, INC. 1 62911 402.23 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01244 PACIFIC NURSERIES 1 62912 10019.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01249 PACIFICA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1 62913 26414.06 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01309 POLYDYNE INC. 1 62914 4985.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01329 PUMP REPAIR SERVICE CO., INC. 1 62915 1920.22 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01337 R & H WHOLESALE SUPPLY, INC. 1 62916 403.48 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01372 RITE-WAY ELECTRIC 1 62917 1920.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03306 ROBERT HALF MANAGEMENT RESOURCES 1 62918 4500.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02879 SAVIOR P. MICALLEF, L.S. 8289 1 62919 265.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05677 SFO MEDICAL CLINIC Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 3
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 62920 7838.13 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01570 SYNAGRO WEST, LLC 1 62921 6000.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05487 THE LEW EDWARDS GROUP 1 62922 625.50 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05692 TJC AND ASSOCIATES INC. 1 62923 9152.35 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04670 U.S. TELEPACIFIC CORP. 1 62924 10668.69 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04576 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC 1 62925 2705.56 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03835 US FOODS, INC 1 62926 1092.87 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01684 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 62927 2231.00 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 WACHTELBORN, DUANE 1 62928 1037.97 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04999 XEROX FINANCIAL SERVICES 1 62929 126.95 12/02/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 YU, TOMMY 1 62946 136.24 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00136 ALHAMBRA 1 62947 188.31 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00138 ALL INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC. 1 62948 913.99 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04980 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 1 62949 4778.74 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00217 ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS 1 62950 419.12 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00009 AT&T MOBILITY 1 62951 200.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04561 AVINA, ANGEL 1 62952 11000.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05738 BAKER TILLY US, LLP 1 62953 1430.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00258 BARTLE WELLS ASSOCIATES 1 62954 425.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 BLACKBURN, CODY 1 62955 95.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05127 BLEYLE ELEVATOR, INC. 1 62956 409.26 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00377 BUCKLES-SMITH 1 62957 109052.21 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02502 BURKE WILLIAMS AND SORENSEN LLP 1 62958 526.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00011 C.W.E.A. 1 62959 55.25 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00454 CAL-STEAM INC.#2504 1 62960 2121.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01690 CALTEST ANALYTICAL LAB 1 62961 2441.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03814 CAPPSTONE, INC.
Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 4
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.b
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Attachment 2: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 12-1 to 12-31-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22) 1 62962 3956.95 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00507 CHILDCARE CAREERS 1 62963 839.69 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00510 CINTAS 1 62964 3462.80 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00510 CINTAS CORPORATION #464 1 62965 5792.08 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00049 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1 62966 564.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05552 CIVICPLUS, LLC 1 62967 293.10 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03246 COAST COUNTIES PETERBILT & COAST COUNTIE 1 62968 4829.42 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04446 COLORPRINT 1 62969 198.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05082 COLUMN, PBC 1 62970 323.12 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04677 CORODATA RECORDS MANAGEMENT INC 1 62971 31146.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00611 CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 62972 390.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 DA ROZA, JOHN PAUL 1 62973 7716.37 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00025 DALY CITY/CITY OF 1 62974 350.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05062 DARRYL PANG 1 62975 10010.94 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00653 DELL MARKETING L.P. 1 62976 29473.75 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05691 DKS ASSOCIATES 1 62977 1350.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04277 EASTMAN INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES 1 62978 4913.48 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04275 EKI ENVIRONMENT & WATER, INC 1 62979 232.81 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03469 EVANTEC CORPORATION 1 62980 4764.48 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03643 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 1 62981 5569.57 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02767 FLYERS ENERGY, LLC 1 62982 328.13 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02213 GARRATT CALLAHAN 1 62983 74873.75 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05269 GOOD CITY COMPANY 1 62984 3695.05 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00872 GRAINGER 1 62985 750.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03947 GRANICUS, INC. 1 62986 589.35 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00875 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY #26577 1 62987 158.46 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02415 GYM DOCTORS Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 5
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 62988 520.58 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00892 HACH COMPANY 1 62989 114.76 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04842 HEMRAJ SINGH 1 62990 4974.19 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00919 HERC RENTALS INC. 1 62991 547.13 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04850 HOME DEPOT USA, INC. 1 62992 2248.47 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02511 IDEXX LABORATORIES 1 62993 7452.06 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04373 INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER SERVICES 1 62994 300.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04086 JACK DOHENY COMPANY 1 62995 21365.50 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05467 JDB & SONS CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 62996 10.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05744 JONAH CHEW 1 62997 300.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05739 KATHLEEN BROOKSHIRE 1 62998 1800.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05657 KAUFMAN ENTERPRISES, LLC 1 62999 154.10 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01812 KBA DOCUSYS 1 63000 134.91 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01041 KELLY-MOORE PAINT CO.,INC. 1 63001 428.21 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03700 KIMBALL MIDWEST 1 63002 450.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 LECHLEITNER, KYLE 1 63003 78.74 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05107 MAHONEY-ROHRL, SOPHIA 1 63004 560.28 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01124 MARATHON DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.b
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Attachment 2: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 12-1 to 12-31-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22) 1 63005 1695.75 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03779 MAXX METALS 1 63006 5983.61 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01142 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 1 63007 425.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 MCINTURF, GREG 1 63008 7528.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04077 METROPOLITAN PLANNING GROUP 1 63009 74.12 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 MILLS, VICKY 1 63010 4995.50 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05412 MONSIDO, INC. 1 63011 20671.87 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05098 NEXTREQUEST CO. 1 63012 6552.72 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02283 NORCAL SOUND CO INC 1 63013 1794.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03656 NORTH AMERICAN FENCE & RAILING Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 6
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 63014 666.42 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02486 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 1 63015 80.89 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01217 OFFICE DEPOT 1 63016 534.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04418 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION 1 63017 13104.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01261 PACIFICA SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 63018 306.69 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00054 PAPE MATERIAL HANDLING EXCHANGE 1 63019 16965.90 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00320 PLAN JPA 1 63020 1043.22 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01336 QUILL CORPORATION 1 63021 1120.25 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04026 RANEY PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, INC 1 63022 3552.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03306 ROBERT HALF MANAGEMENT RESOURCES 1 63023 551.57 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01385 ROZZI REPRODUCTION & SUPPLY INC.. 1 63024 2117.59 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01450 SEAVIEW TIRE & BRAKE CENTER 1 63025 101.16 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01461 SERRAMONTE FORD INC. 1 63026 775.66 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05465 SIGILLO SUPPLY, INC. 1 63027 50.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01511 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY 1 63028 425.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 STAFFORD, JEREMY 1 63029 130.10 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02017 STATE LANDS COMMISSION 1 63030 153.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01546 STERICYCLE 1 63031 511.53 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02642 T-MOBILE CORPORATION 1 63032 2000.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05745 TERESA MCMAHON 1 63033 26759.54 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04872 TERI BLACK & COMPANY LLC 1 63034 5693.71 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04299 THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY 1 63035 435.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01615 TOM'S AUTO BODY & PAINT 1 63036 366.35 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01647 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY SPECIALISTS 1 63037 13.20 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01652 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1 63038 3294.69 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01653 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) 1 63039 5323.53 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03835 US FOODS, INC Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 7
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 63040 4095.02 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01684 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 63041 2778.76 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01673 VWR INTERNATIONAL 1 63042 16882.50 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04832 WOODARD & CURRAN, INC.
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.b
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Attachment 2: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 12-1 to 12-31-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22) 1 63043 364.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05469 BCC BENEFIT COORDINATORS CORPORATION 1 63044 8012.53 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05469 BCC BENEFIT COORDINATORS CORPORATION 1 63045 9420.45 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03741 BENEFIT COORDINATORS CORPORATION 1 63046 29.50 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01757 CALIFORNIA ASSN OF PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGH 1 63047 242.76 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 1 63048 192.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 1 63049 729.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01757 CLEA
1 63050 50.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 63051 350.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 63052 562.66 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 63053 100.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 63054 110.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 63055 838.60 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01758 PACIFICA FIREFIGHTERS UNION 1 63056 800.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01759 PACIFICA POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 1 63057 200.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01760 PACIFICA POLICE OFFICERS SAVINGS 1 63058 360.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01769 PACIFICA POLICE SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION 1 63059 1401.26 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01758 SMC FIREFIGHTERS IAFF Local 2400 1 63060 92.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01758 SMC FIREFIGHTERS PAC 1 63061 1008.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01768 TEAMSTERS LOCAL #350 1 63062 2662.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01764 TEAMSTERS LOCAL #856 1 63063 60984.00 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01771 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 856 1 63064 3448.65 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01766 VISION SERVICE PLAN-CA 1 63065 17.32 12/09/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01766 VISION SERVICE PLAN-CA Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 8
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 63066 4111.15 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00009 AT&T
1 63067 118.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04066 ALERT PEST CONTROL COMPANY INC 1 63068 2242.19 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00138 ALL INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC. 1 63069 1315.73 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04980 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 1 63070 43.65 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00009 AT&T LONG DISTANCE 1 63071 804.13 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00293 BEARING AGENCIES INC 1 63072 425.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 BLACKBURN, CODY 1 63073 66.34 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 BRAUN, LUCIE 1 63074 6952.50 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05463 BRETT STOLLENWERK 1 63075 685.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05748 BRITTA LORENZ 1 63076 114711.75 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02502 BURKE WILLIAMS AND SORENSEN LLP 1 63077 199.40 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00454 CAL-STEAM INC.#2504 1 63078 4950.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05483 CALIFORNIA CONSULTING, INC. 1 63079 134.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01690 CALTEST ANALYTICAL LAB 1 63080 4620.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03814 CAPPSTONE, INC. 1 63081 131.56 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 CASTRO, ANGEL 1 63082 910.80 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00507 CHILDCARE CAREERS 1 63083 1227.59 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00510 CINTAS CORPORATION #464 1 63084 1417.50 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05058 CLIENTFIRST CONSULTING GROUP, LLC 1 63085 420.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00019 COLMA FIREMAN'S SOCIAL CLUB
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.b
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Attachment 2: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 12-1 to 12-31-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22) 1 63086 528.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05082 COLUMN, PBC 1 63087 356.21 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01374 CORE & MAIN 1 63088 478.96 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04677 CORODATA RECORDS MANAGEMENT INC 1 63089 431.20 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00587 CPS HR CONSULTING 1 63090 6510.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05341 CREATIVE DIGITAL AGENCY INC. 1 63091 518.19 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00630 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 9
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 63092 459.98 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00025 DALY CITY/CITY OF 1 63093 250.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00014 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1 63094 1300.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04321 DUBOCE JANITORIAL SERVICES 1 63095 3102.26 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05683 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION STEP 1 63096 82.88 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00714 EBI AGGREGATES-BRISBANE 1 63097 4726.50 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05687 ELLIS INVESTIGATIONS LAW CORPORATION 1 63098 1400.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04274 EMCOR SERVICES 1 63099 6876.12 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03458 EOA INC 1 63100 129.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03469 EVANTEC CORPORATION 1 63101 4995.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03331 EWERS ENGINEERING 1 63102 7.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03047 FASTRAK VIOLATION PROCESSING DEPARTMENT 1 63103 15.05 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00773 FEDEX
1 63104 7217.06 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03006 FEHR PEERS 1 63105 4260.72 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02767 FLYERS ENERGY, LLC 1 63106 16496.75 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04369 GHD INC. 1 63107 838.57 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00872 GRAINGER 1 63108 29788.72 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03616 GROUP 4 ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH PLANNING I 1 63109 7891.75 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04600 GSE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC 1 63110 1065.16 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00892 HACH COMPANY 1 63111 343.88 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00906 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 1 63112 250.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 HIGGINS, JEFF 1 63113 813.46 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04859 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1 63114 285.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05453 INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES 1 63115 255.94 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00990 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC CONTROL PRODUCTS 1 63116 787.52 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04085 JAMES FORD, INC. 1 63117 188.21 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01014 JOHN THE SIGN GUY LLC Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 10
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 63118 563.48 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01055 KONE INC 1 63119 137.76 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01142 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 1 63120 2843.75 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04077 METROPOLITAN PLANNING GROUP 1 63121 3347.18 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03955 MOFFATT & NICHOL 1 63122 1125.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04165 MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC. 1 63123 9224.30 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05369 MUCHMORE THAN CONSULTING, LLC 1 63124 646.63 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04549 NAF SERVICES, INC.
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.b
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Attachment 2: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 12-1 to 12-31-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22) 1 63125 15186.40 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01206 NORTH COAST COUNTY WATER DIST. 1 63126 1840.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 O'CONNOR, BONNY 1 63127 76.79 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01217 OFFICE DEPOT 1 63128 175126.36 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01240 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. 1 63129 188.67 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01244 PACIFIC NURSERIES 1 63130 687.86 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00054 PAPE MACHINERY 1 63131 9581.70 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05698 PARKSON CORPORATION 1 63132 1989.91 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05747 PENINSULA SCREEN SHOP LLC 1 63133 461.48 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03782 PRIORITY 1 PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT 1 63134 536.25 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05746 PSI CONSULTING INC 1 63135 800.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03160 PUBLIC PARKING ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 63136 196.33 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01336 QUILL CORPORATION 1 63137 2388.05 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04026 RANEY PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, INC 1 63138 5920.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03306 ROBERT HALF MANAGEMENT RESOURCES 1 63139 75.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05749 SAN MATEO CONSOLIDATED FIRE DEPARTMENT 1 63140 130.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00022 SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1 63141 2754.80 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00055 SAN MATEO COUNTY FORENSIC LAB 1 63142 296045.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00022 SAN MATEO COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEM 1 63143 275.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00022 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 11
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 63144 275.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00022 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF 1 63145 2525.09 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04860 SERRA YELLOW CAB 1 63146 190.58 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01461 SERRAMONTE FORD INC. 1 63147 550.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01531 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, INC. 1 63148 93.01 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01548 STEVEN ENGINEERING, INC. 1 63149 39698.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02681 SUN RIDGE SYSTEMS, INC 1 63150 291.10 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00002 SUZUKI, MARIA (PETTY CASH) 1 63151 17666.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00044 SWRCB 1 63152 28.80 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02642 T-MOBILE CORPORATION 1 63153 25817.03 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04872 TERI BLACK & COMPANY LLC 1 63154 1530.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01593 TESCO CONTROLS INC. 1 63155 6000.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05487 THE LEW EDWARDS GROUP 1 63156 131.56 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 TRAN, HENRY 1 63157 786.15 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04418 U.S. BANK EQUIPMENT FINANCING, INC. 1 63158 615.50 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01647 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY SPECIALISTS 1 63159 5452.21 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01656 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA, INC. 1 63160 3238.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02527 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 1 63161 262.18 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01812 US BANK EQUIPMENT FINANCE 1 63162 3131.72 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03835 US FOODS, INC 1 63163 60.08 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01684 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 63164 3580.64 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01673 VWR INTERNATIONAL 1 63165 4261.57 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01701 WECO INDUSTRIES 1 63166 85.50 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05163 WEX HEALTH, INC. 1 63167 760.00 12/16/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04832 WOODARD & CURRAN, INC.
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.b
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Attachment 2: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 12-1 to 12-31-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22) 1 63168 2051.52 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00009 AT&T
1 63169 76199.30 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04584 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 12
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 63170 9463.14 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 AGUILAR, MARIA 1 63171 250.75 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04066 ALERT PEST CONTROL COMPANY INC 1 63172 75.47 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00138 ALL INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC. 1 63173 510.78 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04980 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 1 63174 184.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05556 AMERICAN DEBRIS BOX SERVICE INC. 1 63175 406.77 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00009 AT&T
1 63176 240.24 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00009 AT&T MOBILITY 1 63177 178.46 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00225 ATCO INTERNATIONAL 1 63178 11.45 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04666 B & D DONOR RECOGNITION 1 63179 391.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02508 BMI
1 63180 260.67 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00002 BRAUN, LUCIE (PETTY CASH) 1 63181 5684.75 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05658 BSK ASSOCIATES 1 63182 616.20 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02502 BURKE WILLIAMS AND SORENSEN LLP 1 63183 324.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00011 C.W.E.A. 1 63184 256.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00014 CALIFORNIA STATE OF 1 63185 268.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01690 CALTEST ANALYTICAL LAB 1 63186 66618.75 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03745 CASEY CONSTRUCTION, INC 1 63187 2349.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00507 CHILDCARE CAREERS 1 63188 1113.13 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00510 CINTAS 1 63189 2023.18 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00510 CINTAS CORPORATION #464 1 63190 113.17 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00526 CLEARLITE TROPHIES 1 63191 26837.19 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00556 COLUMBIA CASCADE COMPANY 1 63192 169.02 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02168 COMCAST 1 63193 14916.23 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03787 CONTRACT SWEEPING SERVICES 1 63194 10219.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00595 COTTON, SHIRES & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 63195 480.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00024 CRITICAL REACH Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 13
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 63196 14738.93 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00611 CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 63197 347750.68 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03121 D.W. NICHOLSON CORPORTATION 1 63198 1544.55 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04386 EDGEWORTH INTEGRATION LLC 1 63199 2449.50 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05687 ELLIS INVESTIGATIONS LAW CORPORATION 1 63200 250.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 FERREIRA, WILLIAM 1 63201 6872.69 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02767 FLYERS ENERGY, LLC 1 63202 339.26 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 FONG, KEN 1 63203 23460.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05269 GOOD CITY COMPANY 1 63204 706.75 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00872 GRAINGER 1 63205 59.44 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00892 HACH COMPANY
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.b
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Attachment 2: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 12-1 to 12-31-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22) 1 63206 2703.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05103 HADRONEX INC. 1 63207 45.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00924 HILL SCOTT 1 63208 1009.57 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04999 IMAGE SOURCE 1 63209 6688.59 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04086 JACK DOHENY COMPANY 1 63210 2000.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05751 JED THOMPSON 1 63211 43.87 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05532 JOAN ARTHUR 1 63212 95.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05333 KASEYA US LLC 1 63213 5043.17 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05569 KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL, INC. 1 63214 9216.75 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04088 LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES 1 63215 1859.38 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01070 LAURETTA PRINTING COMPANY 1 63216 999.62 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01095 LINDA MAR HARDWARE 1 63217 2000.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05752 MARK HARDEMAN 1 63218 6260.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04724 MARK RESOLVE, INC. 1 63219 975.65 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01142 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 1 63220 3703.80 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01183 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 63221 517.30 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04549 NAF SERVICES, INC.
Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 14
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 63222 5150.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04632 NICHOLS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, CHTD 1 63223 2559.48 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01206 NORTH COAST COUNTY WATER DIST. 1 63224 1285.76 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01297 PARS
1 63225 179.79 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 POWERS, MATTHEW 1 63226 110.11 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01322 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT 1 63227 196414.22 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01329 PUMP REPAIR SERVICE CO., INC. 1 63228 361.37 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01336 QUILL CORPORATION 1 63229 3546.10 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00022 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLER 1 63230 164.51 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00022 SAN MATEO COUNTY INFORMATION SERVICES 1 63231 78.08 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05197 SAN MATEO COUNTY MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTR 1 63232 453.50 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01422 SAN MATEO ELECTRONIC SUPPLY 1 63233 46986.12 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05690 SCA OF CA, LLC 1 63234 150.93 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02182 SERVICE PRESS, INC. 1 63235 161.80 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00002 SOLIS, ELIZABETH ( PETTY CASH ) 1 63236 549.53 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01534 STANDARD PLUMBING SUPPLY CO. 1 63237 26438.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00044 SWRCB 1 63238 9007.87 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01570 SYNAGRO WEST, LLC 1 63239 1022.91 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01636 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 1 63240 366.01 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01637 TURF & INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT CO 1 63241 4500.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03457 U.S. BANK 1 63242 83.51 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01647 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY SPECIALISTS 1 63243 21.06 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02663 UNDERWOOD, EILEEN 1 63244 2568.53 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01656 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA, INC. 1 63245 395.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05753 UNITED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, LLC 1 63246 179.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01661 UPS STORE #1906 1 63247 402.63 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01812 US BANK EQUIPMENT FINANCE Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 15
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.b
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Attachment 2: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 12-1 to 12-31-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 63248 921.44 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03980 VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY 1 63249 194.18 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01673 VWR INTERNATIONAL 1 63250 590.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01737 WORLD JOURNAL SF LLC 1 63251 67.86 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 YEUNG, CHRISTIE 1 63252 1202.64 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01747 ZEP SALES & SERVICE 1 63253 242.76 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 1 63254 192.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 1 63255 50.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 63256 350.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 63257 562.66 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 63258 100.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 63259 110.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 63260 246.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01767 NPFBA
1 63261 930.60 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01758 PACIFICA FIREFIGHTERS UNION 1 63262 439.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01758 PACIFICA FIREFIGHTERS-LTD 1 63263 760.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01759 PACIFICA POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 1 63264 190.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01760 PACIFICA POLICE OFFICERS SAVINGS 1 63265 420.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01769 PACIFICA POLICE SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION 1 63266 1401.16 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01758 SMC FIREFIGHTERS IAFF Local 2400 1 63267 2662.00 12/23/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01764 TEAMSTERS LOCAL #856 1 63268 10.93 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04655 123-AWARDS.COM 1 63269 134.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04631 ALTA LANGUAGE SERVICES, INC. 1 63270 398.36 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04980 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 1 63271 137.92 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00009 AT&T
1 63272 129.69 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00009 AT&T MOBILITY 1 63273 373.82 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03793 BK TECHNOLOGIESINC.
Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 16
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 63274 425.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 BLACKBURN, CODY 1 63275 1178.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04880 BLADES GROUP, LLC 1 63276 23900.08 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00364 BRISBANE/CITY 0F 1 63277 59190.56 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02502 BURKE WILLIAMS AND SORENSEN LLP 1 63278 373.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05656 CAL STATE UNIV LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUND 1 63279 67.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01690 CALTEST ANALYTICAL LAB 1 63280 527.70 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 CAMARGO, SUZANNE 1 63281 133361.94 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02655 CAROLLO 1 63282 471.93 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00483 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 1 63283 3156.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00507 CHILDCARE CAREERS 1 63284 1174.83 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00510 CINTAS CORPORATION #464 1 63285 184.96 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02822 CITY AUTO SUPPLY 1 63286 3791.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05552 CIVICPLUS, LLC 1 63287 768.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00553 COLOMBO'S DELICATESSEN
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.b
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Attachment 2: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 12-1 to 12-31-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22) 1 63288 495.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05082 COLUMN, PBC 1 63289 73.96 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02168 COMCAST 1 63290 6557.96 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00595 COTTON, SHIRES & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 63291 62896.09 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00611 CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 63292 325.23 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03590 DASH MEDICAL GLOVES 1 63293 50.93 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02614 DISH
1 63294 64671.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01854 DYETT & BHATIA 1 63295 720.96 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02793 EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO., INC 1 63296 1350.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04277 EASTMAN INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES 1 63297 9014.72 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04275 EKI ENVIRONMENT & WATER, INC 1 63298 109.95 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00489 ENTERSECT 1 63299 605.15 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00745 ENVIRONMENTAL EXPRESS, INC.
Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 17
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 63300 35.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03047 FASTRAK VIOLATION PROCESSING DEPARTMENT 1 63301 15.05 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00773 FEDEX
1 63302 16313.75 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03006 FEHR PEERS 1 63303 8030.19 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02767 FLYERS ENERGY, LLC 1 63304 12712.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03930 FREYER & LAURETA, INC. 1 63305 51893.24 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05220 GHIRARDELLI ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 63306 1019.55 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00892 HACH COMPANY 1 63307 82.47 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00906 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 1 63308 1077.31 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00927 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS & ASSOC 1 63309 31513.57 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05667 IPS GROUP INC. 1 63310 1139.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05755 IVAN RIVAS 1 63311 1170.73 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01027 K 119 OF CALIFORNIA 1 63312 72.76 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01812 KBA DOCUSYS 1 63313 13158.94 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05535 KOSMONT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 63314 325.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 LA, EMILY 1 63315 1635.16 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01070 LAURETTA PRINTING COMPANY 1 63316 2000.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05756 MADELINE HART 1 63317 1693.26 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01142 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 1 63318 2000.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05757 MEG HUNTER 1 63319 663.44 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01183 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 63320 1050.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01378 MUSCIO ELECTRIC 1 63321 600.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01378 MUSCIO SECURITY 1 63322 739.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04549 NAF SERVICES, INC. 1 63323 500.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01214 OCEANA SMOG TEST ONLY CENTER 1 63324 527.72 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01217 OFFICE DEPOT 1 63325 7050.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01249 PACIFICA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 18
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.b
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Attachment 2: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 12-1 to 12-31-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22) 1 63326 13104.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01261 PACIFICA SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 63327 1182.73 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01289 PENINSULA UNIFORMS & EQUIPMENT, INC 1 63328 89823.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01295 PETERSON POWER SYSTEMS INC. 1 63329 573.99 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01336 QUILL CORPORATION 1 63330 552.36 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01337 R & H WHOLESALE SUPPLY, INC. 1 63331 16013.40 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03281 REGIONAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES 1 63332 185.14 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 SALACUP, MACAELA 1 63333 2050.90 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03620 SAN MATEO COUNTY REGISTRATION AND ELECTI 1 63334 2295.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03720 SAN MATEO DAILY JOURNAL 1 63335 12505.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04646 SCHAAF & WHEELER 1 63336 161.34 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02182 SERVICE PRESS, INC. 1 63337 311.18 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01498 SMART & FINAL 1 63338 1477.64 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01587 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE 1 63339 225.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01029 THE PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP INC. 1 63340 13670.25 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05692 TJC AND ASSOCIATES INC. 1 63341 167.80 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 TONDELLI-WALSH, NATALIE 1 63342 9152.35 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04670 U.S. TELEPACIFIC CORP. 1 63343 2368.89 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01647 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY SPECIALISTS 1 63344 8764.06 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03835 US FOODS, INC 1 63345 1070.77 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01684 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 63346 772.96 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01673 VWR INTERNATIONAL 1 63347 5040.00 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01182 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 1 63348 985.50 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04832 WOODARD & CURRAN, INC. 1 63349 1037.97 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04999 XEROX FINANCIAL SERVICES 1 63350 109.06 12/30/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02495 YSI INCORPORATED 1 63351 30128.05 12/31/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04608 TRI COUNTIES BANK Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: TUESDAY JAN1023 10:41 Page: 19
CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/22 - 12/31/22 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL
PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 63352 379370.80 12/31/22 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05495 W.E. LYONS CONSTRUCTION CO.
BANK: 1 TOTAL # OF CHECKS: 469 FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT OF: $4443227.93 TOTAL # OF REISSUED CHECKS: 0 FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT OF:
TOTAL # OF ACH CHECKS: 0 FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT OF:
http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=0&FileName=D:\GemsE... 1/10/2023
1.b
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Attachment 2: Disbursements -FY 22-23 - 12-1 to 12-31-22 (5226 : Disbursements - Dated 11/16/22 through 12/31/22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/23/2023
1 SUBJECT:
Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Move to approve the minutes of the City Council Regular Meeting held on January 9, 2023.
STAFF CONTACT:
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
650-738-7307
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Move to approve the minutes of the City Council Regular Meeting held on January 9, 2023 (Attachment A).
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ORIGINATED BY:
City Clerk
ATTACHMENT LIST:
Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (PDF) 2 Packet Pg. 215
CITY OF PACIFICA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Council Chambers
2212 Beach Blvd
Pacifica, CA 94044
Mayor Tygarjas Bigstyck
Mayor pro Tem Sue Vaterlaus
Councilmember Sue Beckmeyer
Councilmember Mary Bier
Councilmember Christine Boles
City Council Regular Meeting 1 January 09, 2023
REGULAR MEETING
January 09, 2023 (MONDAY)
www.cityofpacifica.org
Mayor Tygarjas Bigstyck called the meeting to order on January 9, 2023 at 7:00 PM 7:00 PM OPEN SESSION
Call to Order
Mayor Bigstyck called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Tygarjas Bigstyck Mayor Present
Sue Vaterlaus Mayor pro Tem Present
Sue Beckmeyer Councilmember Present
Mary Bier Councilmember Present
Christine Boles Councilmember Present
City Clerk Coffey took a verbal roll call.
Staff Present: Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager; Denise Bazzano, Asst, City Attorney; Yulia Carter, Asst. City Manager; Christian Murdock, Planning Director; Kirk Stratton, Interim Police Chief; Bill Glasgo, Police Captain; Chris Clements, Police Captain; Maria Aguilar, PW Dep.
Director; Raymund Donguines, Sr. Civil Engineer; Bob Palacio, PB&R Director; Kenneth Fong, IT Analyst; Sarah Coffey, City Clerk; Emily La, Dep. City Clerk.
Reading of Land Acknowledgment
Mayor Bigstyck read the Land Acknowledgment.
Salute to the Flag led by Mayor Bigstyck
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Proclamation - Michael Perez
2.a
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 2 January 09, 2023
Mayor Bigstyck read a proclamation honoring the retirement of PB&R Director Michael Perez.
He added that State Senator Josh Becker’s office has also sent recognition.
Councilmember Bier thanked him for all he has done for our city over the years as he has touched so many young people and their families. She also thanked him for being a mentor for her: He taught her how to be a commissioner, encouraged her to become a councilmember, and helped her with Pacifica Prevention Partnership, etc. She strove to be like him.
Councilmember Beckmeyer thanked him for all he has taught her regarding every part of PB&R as his knowledge is immense. She stated that, in serving with him with Pacifica School Volunteers, he brought so much to that experience because of what he has done.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus thanked him for everything, as she and her family have close ties to PB&R. She thanked him for everything he has done over the many years he has been here.
Councilmember Boles stated that she was sad that she would not get to work with him. She thought he must have the most fun job in the city in working with the kids and seniors and assuring that everyone is engaged, happy, and learning, but she knows it is a difficult job, especially the last few years with COVID-19. She stated that 34 years is a long time and he has seen their kids grow up and become adults, adding that he must have amazing memories in connection with the city.
Mayor Bigstyck thanked him for choosing to make Pacifica his home as well as a home for all of us so thoroughly. He stated that, before it occurred to him that he might want to be on Council, he got to walk by his house every day on the way to work, and that showed to him how deeply ingrained in this community he is. He thought, with what he facilitated over his lifetime career, he brought forth the continuity of our community for so many lives for so long. He stated that he and his experience will be missed.
Michael Perez thanked them all very much, as well as the past Councils and the PB&R Commission. He stated that, in the three decades of working as a recreation professional in Pacifica, it is about building relationships. He stated that the process of working with a diverse group of people to address challenges, solve problems, and create opportunities has been some of the most rewarding work in his career. He has had days filled with meaningful interactions with people he met for the first time as well as those he has cultivated relationships with over the years. He stated that those interactions are important as they are the building blocks of their work and organization in the community. He has had the privilege of working with outstanding staff members over those 30 years who helped and contributed to his development as a professional, leader, and department director. He was fortunate to work with PB&R staff and volunteers who continue display their dedication to the programs and compassion to the participants, especially the challenges over the last few years due to COVID19. He thanked his wife and daughters, in addition to his entire family. He thanked them for this honor and looked forward to his next chapter.
Mayor Bigstyck opened public comments.
Suzanne Moore, Pacifica, thanked Mr. Perez and his family for all the hard work, and the public is very appreciative.
Mayor Bigstyck closed public comments, and they took a picture.
2.a
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 3 January 09, 2023
B. Proclamation - Paul Lavorini
Mayor Bigstyck referred to a proclamation for Field Services Manager Paul Lavorini, and he stated that, though he would be honored to read it, he had a request from a councilmember.
Councilmember Beckmeyer read the proclamation honoring the retirement of Field Services Manager Paul Lavorini.
Mayor Bigstyck stated that he would like to open public comments before Council has the opportunity to speak and, seeing no one, closed public comments.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated that he is everywhere, whether for fireworks, Relay for Life, or fallen trees, and she hopes to see him everywhere in the future. She appreciated him more than she could say.
Councilmember Bier thanked him so much and felt she was just getting to know him even though she has seen him for so many years. She stated that he is one person she has taken for granted who would always be there to take care of everything. She noticed how his coworkers and his staff talk about him with respect and how they like working with him, which says a lot about who he is and how he works for Pacifica. She appreciated him and hopes to continue getting to know him better.
Councilmember Boles stated that she hasn’t had the experience of meeting him, but it was a treat to learn about him. He was obviously an invaluable member of our city team and she wasn’t sure how they will do without him after hearing all he has done. She was impressed on how he has moved around, learning and growing wherever he worked, as that was a sign of dedication and leadership. She wished him well.
Councilmember Beckmeyer stated that she can speak confidently regarding the time she has known him, what he has done, as well as who he is. She is proud to hold him and his entire family as dear friends. She stated that, besides all the work history he has, the thing that impresses her the most is what he has taught others, not only by his specific skills but also by his example, enthusiasm, etc., because it is work hard, play hard. She stated that he has inspired her with his willingness to lean in when the challenge is there. She stated that building his knowledge over time is the epitome of being a learning organization and developing professionally. She was grateful to know him and know they will be seeing each other at the Moose Lodge and at relays. She thanked him for all he has given to our city and its residents.
Mayor Bigstyck stated that he thinks PW staff are too often are unsung heroes in our community. He stated that, when someone sees a police vehicle or fire truck, they have some idea; but when a PW vehicle goes down the street, he doesn’t know how often the community is aware that they are holding the physical fiber of our community together. He thanked him as he has an acute understanding of that, which is why he tries to remind people that PW is holding things together for us every chance he gets. He referred to Councilmember Boles’ comment and imagined that, if we are able to survive without him, it is because of how much time he has spent teaching those who will come after him. He thanked him for passing that onto the future of PW, what we will need as a city. He stated that he knows him best from walking around a circle, referring to Relay for Life, more than anywhere else; he cultivated his voice in terms of building community and helping those who have come from some of the deepest places of healing to form that community and a heart within our community, and making sure the area is clean and safe and the logistics are taken care of. He thanked him for his work for the city
2.a
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 4 January 09, 2023
which translated deeper into building us as a community. He was grateful to get to know him as friend and brother and congratulated him on his well-earned retirement.
Mayor Bigstyck re-opened public comment.
Sue Digre, Pacifica, stated that she was sorry she wasn’t present, and referred to her 16 years working with both Michael Perez and Paul Lavorini. She stated that it has been a real honor and they epitomize the great Pacifica spirit with the heart and drive. She appreciated all they have done for the city which has been remarkable and she was glad that they will both still be around.
Mayor Bigstyck closed public comment.
Paul Lavorini thanked them very much. He stated he was lucky to have a career in Pacifica.
He has made a lot of friends along the way and is retiring healthy and happy. He stated that he would invite this whole Council, including Michael Perez, to his house for a BBQ and a beer, as well as everyone in the City Manager’s office, all his colleagues whom he can call his friends.
He has had a good, fun career. He is very honored to be present at this meeting and stand in front of them and be acknowledged. He referred to Michael Perez, stating he did a great job and they have been together forever but have been in different areas but have had great support. He stated that working for Pacifica is about community to him. He stated you get what you put in and he has been working with one homeowner at a time and they can go to Mazzetti’s and talk about it and tell ten other people about PW. He stated that his whole career has been with PW and has worked with the community to let them understand what PW is about, as they are not just out there doing small jobs, but behind the scenes and in the community, with their children growing up, going to stores, helping others, even after work hours, to make sure others are taken care of, which is an honor. He thanked Council and also thanked his family for the sacrifice that they have made as he has missed quite a few Christmases and birthdays, as he is out there at night. He knows he is going to miss it. He has a lot of things on his plate, people he wants to work with, and adventures he wants to do. He wants to spend time with his wife and kids as he worked at different times around the clock, would get a break and rest and go back to work. You have to make sure everything is taken care and do that in front of the public, seen and in some cases judged; but if you put on your best performance, and do the right things, it works. He was lucky to live that way and enjoy everything he does every minute of the day. He has fun and it is good to challenge each other and you get the job done and learn from it. He mentioned everything they know regarding mud slides, wiring, flooding, etc. He stated that the way he lived his career was to teach staff everything he knows and, if they can take his job, he did his job. He has been blessed with this great community and he will still do what he does and start walking the hills and do different things. He thanked them for allowing him to have this time with them and he stated that they should enjoy every minute as it is worth it.
Mayor Bigstyck then asked to take a photo with him. He also stated that Senator Becker sent recognition.
C. Proclamation - Sergeant Dominic Albanese
Mayor Bigstyck read the proclamation honoring the retirement of Police Sergeant Dominic Albanese. He stated that he is not with them at this time, but he opened up public comments and, seeing no one, closed public comments. He then opened it up to Councilmember comments.
2.a
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 5 January 09, 2023
Councilmember Bier thanked him for his service, adding that they always know they are a good police officer when the young people are afraid of him, which she remembers the most as being the cop to watch out for if they are doing bad things. She appreciated all his years of service.
Councilmember Beckmeyer was also grateful for his 34 years of service in our community and keeping us safe. She wished him well in his future endeavors.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus admired his 34 years of service and she was glad she never came across him on the streets as she might be in trouble. She appreciated all the time he spent here, thanked him, and wished him an enjoyable retirement.
Councilmember Boles stated that putting your life on line for 34 years in our community is a huge undertaking and shows love and dedication to the community. She thanked him and was glad he made it out alive and hope he enjoys his retirement.
Mayor Bigstyck echoed what his fellow Councilmembers said. He was struck by honoring three people who have given a small lifetime to our community. He stated that it was not a small thing to sign up and put your wellbeing overtly at risk and he has served our community to make it a safer place. He stated that, while young people didn’t want to cross his path, it strikes him that, if this impression was left, it was done by him to ensure their safety and they may walk a better path. He thanked him for his service and hoped he enjoyed his well-earned retirement.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Bigstyck asked if any Councilmember wanted to pull any items.
Councilmember Bier had a comment to make on one of the items, No. 15. She stated, for the record, anything that has to do with this particular topic should probably not be on consent as she thought our community deserves the opportunity to be able to talk about it in every single stage of development.
Mayor Bigstyck opened public comments.
Pam Welty, Pacifica, stated she was going to talk about Consent Item No. 5, the Anza Pump Station, and shared all the disasters the nearby residents continue to experience and they hope to get some movement on this problem and they look to hearing from them in the near future.
Mayor Bigstyck closed public comments. He then asked questions, i.e., recent flooding in the area, and he thought it was the Linda Mar pump that was malfunctioning and helped create some of the flooding, and he asked the City Manager if the Anza pump worked, as well as where they are in terms of fixing the Anza pump station and how soon that state of emergency will be over.
City Manager Woodhouse clarified that the Anza Pump station and its emergency is separate from the storm emergency they just declared, but the pump malfunction issue they had was at the Linda Mar pump station. He stated that the Anza Pump Station emergency was from the fire that destroyed the contents of the pump station two years ago and it has been a complex replacement restoration emergency project, due to supply chain issues related to the technology needed in that. He stated that it was proceeding, and he thought it was wrapping up for completion in the spring, with the necessary emergency repairs at the Anza Pump Station. He
2.a
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 6 January 09, 2023
stated that the Linda Mar pump station’s bypass pump that was the key mechanism at the last minute emergency to prevent flooding failed unexpectedly. He stated that, in these big storms, things like this do happen and was part of the problem for the flooding and sanitary overflow on Anza. He stated that they have a robust and aggressive capital program and funding that is underway for all this equipment over the next five years.
Mayor Bigstyck thought so and confirmed his understanding: The Anza Pump Station’s timeline is currently that it should be fixed about spring and, in terms of what failed on New Year’s eve, it was the bypass pump at the Linda Mar pump station which is why the flooding occurred.
City Manager Woodhouse stated that he understood it correctly. He stated that PW Dep.
Director Aguilar is present if he has the estimated timeline incorrect.
PW Dep. Director Aguilar stated the expected completion for the Anza Pump Station is around May or June 2023 because of the supply chain delays on some of the equipment.
Councilmember Boles stated that, in terms of the vote, she was not there at the December 12 meeting and was not sure how she vote on most of it; and on Item No. 15, she knows there is a lot of concern in the community about that project and the next steps, and she was hoping for a quick verbal description of the EIR process and what is typically included and the approximate timeline so they can give the community a heads-up.
Mayor Bigstyck appreciated receiving a comment from the public around that item, stating now might not be the most advantageous time to discuss the issues raised, but asked when would be the correct time to get those community concerns aired.
Planning Director Murdock stated that the item before Council at this meeting is a routine administrative item that they frequently ask Council to do, i.e., authorize a contract for the city to bring on a consultant to perform the expert technical work required to prepare a California Environmental Quality Act or CEQA analysis. He stated, in this instance, they identified that an EIR is appropriate for this development project; the process begins once a project has been deemed complete and is a term of art in planning which means they received all the required information to understand the project and all information required by the Municipal Code or other laws to describe the activity proposed to be undertaken. Once they understand the totality of the project, they not only determine all the permits required, but then what level of environmental review will be required. As mentioned, an EIR is appropriate for this project as they identified the consultant, prepared the contract, and were now asking Council authorization. Once they have the authorization to spend the funds to prepare the EIR, they will receive a deposit from the project applicant, fund the preparation of the EIR, and then prepare what is known is a notice of preparation for public announcements sent to the state clearing house to send to all relevant state agencies; they will publish that and distribute it through other channels so the community knows the city identified that an EIR should be prepared to begin the public process. He stated that there is typically a 30-day comment period for input on the range of environmental impacts that are appropriate to analyze based on the project and also a scoping meeting, which is a public meeting where members of the community and public agencies can provide input on areas of potential environmental impacts that are concerning to them and believe should be evaluated in the EIR. Once they receive all that input and the 30 day scoping period has ended, the city will determine the full extent of the environmental issue areas that will be analyzed in the EIR and commence the technical work to study those impact areas. He stated that the process and timeline can vary depending on the number, range and complexity of those EIR areas. For this project, the consultant estimates approximately eight
2.a
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 7 January 09, 2023
months to prepare the draft EIR based on what we understand as the likely areas of interest and environmental impacts that could expand depending on the input we receive during the notice and preparation process. Once the draft EIR, or first stage of the EIR, has been prepared, it is made available to the public with notice of availability or NOA, which begins a 45-day public review and comment period for the public and agencies to offer their comments on the sufficiency of the EIR analysis. He stated that once that process is completed and the 45-day comment period ends, the city will analyze those comments and prepare responses to comments along with other information, such as a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) and a final EIR includes any revisions to the draft in response to public comments, and they package that up as the final EIR. Then it is taken through the public process along with any public hearings on the project permits in question. He stated that CEQA does not require public hearings on the environmental documents, but it does state where public hearings will occur on the project being undertaken, i.e., Planning Commission and City Council public hearings. The CEQA documents should be considered as a part of that public hearing process, and that will provide additional public input opportunities at both of those public hearings. He stated that the final step in the CEQA process is for the decision-making body, whether Planning Commission or Council or, in some cases, both, to adopt and certify the final EIR after considering the totality of the record and public comments submitted.
Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated that Councilmember Boles had a question about the minutes. She stated that although Councilmember Boles was not in attendance at that meeting, she can approve the minutes as a matter of business, if she feels she had an opportunity to review the minutes and feel they are accurate or she listened to the meeting and believe the minutes to be an accurate reflection of the meeting itself.
City Clerk Coffey took a vote by verbal roll call.
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Sue Beckmeyer, Councilmember
SECONDER: Sue Vaterlaus, Mayor pro Tem
AYES: Bigstyck, Vaterlaus, Beckmeyer, Bier, Boles
1. Approval of Disbursements for Dated 11/01/22 through 11/15/22.
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to approve attached lists of disbursements for 11/01/22 through 11/15/22.
2. Approval of Minutes
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to approve the minutes of the City Council Regular and Special Meeting held on December 12, 2022, and the City Council Special Meeting held on December 15, 2022.
3. Ratification of Proclamation of Local Emergency related to December/January Winter Storm Events
PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution ratifying the Proclamation of Local Emergency related to December/January Winter Storm Events by the City Manager acting as Director of Emergency Services issued on January 4, 2023.
4. Continuation of Proclamation of Local Emergency of the Pacifica Coastline PROPOSED ACTION: Accept report and make a determination that conditions of local emergency continue to exist within the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the end
2.a
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 8 January 09, 2023
of Beach Boulevard
5. Continuation of Proclamation of Local Emergency at the Anza Pump Station.
PROPOSED ACTION: Accept Report and Make a Determination that Conditions of Local Emergency Continue to Exist at the Anza Pump Station at the Pacifica State Beach.
6. Continuation of Proclamation of the Existence of a Local Emergency Regarding Novel (new) Coronavirus ("COVID-19”).
PROPOSED ACTION: Accept report and make determination that conditions of local emergency continue to exist regarding Novel (new) Coronavirus ("COVID-19").
7. Consideration of a Resolution Making Findings as Required by AB 361 to Continue to Permit the City Council and City Commissions and Committees to Conduct Teleconferenced Meetings Due to Health and Safety Concerns Relating to COVID-19 PROPOSED ACTION: Move to adopt a Resolution making findings pursuant to AB 361 to authorize the City Council and City Commissions and Committees to conduct teleconferenced meetings due to health and safety concerns relating to COVID-19.
8. Consideration of Resolution Authorizing City Manager to Execute Agreements with California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) to set up, administer and operate the City of Pacifica Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance, and Resolution Authorizing HDL Companies to Examine Confidential Tax Information for Purposes of Audit
PROPOSED ACTION: Consider and Approve the Agreements and Adopt the Resolutions to allow the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) to administer and operate the City's Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance and adopt resolution authorizing HDL Companies to access confidential sales or transactions and use tax records for purposes of auditing.
9. Quarterly Financial Report for the Quarter ending September 30, 2022.
PROPOSED ACTION: Review and accept the Quarterly Financial Report for the Quarter ending September 30, 2022.
10. Quarterly Treasurer’s Reports for the quarter ending September 30, 2022.
PROPOSED ACTION: Review and accept the Quarterly Treasurer’s Reports for the quarter ending September 30, 2022.
11. Notice of Completion for the Pacifica Public Works New Office Project PROPOSED ACTION: Move to Adopt the Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica accepting completion and directing the City Manager to file Notice of Completion for the Pacifica Public Works New Office Project; and Authorize the City Manager to release the retention funds to the contractor.
12. Esplanade Ave. and Palmetto Ave. Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvement Project - Amendment 1 - Fehr & Peers
PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing Amendment 1 to Task Order 1
2.a
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 9 January 09, 2023
(Attachment 1) between the City of Pacifica and Fehr & Peers design services for the Esplanade Ave. and Palmetto Ave. Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvement Project in the amount of $17,500 bringing the total task order to $57,000; and authorize the City Manager to execute said task order.
13. Approval of City Vehicle Replacement Purchases Phase 1 for FY 2022-23 PROPOSED ACTION:
Approve the following actions for the City Vehicle Replacement Purchases Phase 1 for Fiscal Year 2022-2023:
A. Approve Purchase Agreements with the following:
• Elk Grove Auto/Winner Chevrolet of Elk Grove, CA for the purchase of two (2) 2023 Dodge Durango in the amount of $96,606.56 (Attachment 1) • PB Loader Corporation of Fresno, CA for the purchase of one (1) 2024 Freightliner 10- wheel dump truck in the amount of $210,029.69 (Attachment 2) • Vac-Con of Green Cover Springs, FL for the purchase of one (1) Vac-Con G2 VT310LHAE/1300 in the amount of $618,859.61 (Attachment 3) • Deere & Company of Cary, NC for the purchase of one (1) John Deere 1600 turbo wide area mower in the amount of $89,287.07 (Attachment 4)
• Pape Machinery of Eugene, OR for the purchase of one (1) 410 P-Tier Backhoe Loader in the amount of $196,623.44 (Attachment 5)
• Towne Ford of Redwood City, CA for the purchase of four (4) 2023 Ford PD Utility SUV in the amount of $208,594.93 (Attachment 6)
• Clark Equipment Co. dba Bobcat Company of West Fargo, ND for the purchase of one (1) Bobcat UW56 in the amount of $68,996.63 (Attachment 7) B. Adopt the Resolution to Approve Agreements For the Purchase of City Replacement Vehicles Phase 1 for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 totaling $1,488,997.93; and C. Authorize the City Manager to execute all documents related to these agreements.
14. Fourth Amendment to Consultant Services Agreement for On-Call Planning Services Between the City of Pacifica and Consulting Firm Good City Company PROPOSED ACTION: Move to adopt the attached resolution to approve the Fourth Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services between the City of Pacifica and Good City Company, by increasing the contract amount by $140,000 with a total not to exceed amount of $460,000 and, to authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment.
15. First Amendment to Consultant Services Agreement for On-Call Environmental Review Services Between the City of Pacifica and Consulting Firm Rincon Consultants Inc.
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to adopt the attached resolution to approve the First Amendment to the Master Agreement for Consultant Services between the City of Pacifica and Rincon Consultants Inc., by increasing the contract amount by $177,203 with a total not to exceed amount of $227,203, and to authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment.
16. Authorize the Mayor to Sign a Letter Urging State Legislators to Amend AB 2449 PROPOSED ACTION: Authorize the Mayor, on behalf of the City Council, to sign on to the enclosed letter from the City of San Carlos, urging State legislators to amend AB
2.a
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 10 January 09, 2023
2449.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Anita Rees, Pacifica Resource Center, stated that she was giving quick updates about the PRC’s scheduled openings, updates on holiday program, as well as information on services for tax returns, grocery distributions, and assistance for housing.
Clifford Lawrence, Pacifica, welcomed the new councilmember, congratulated the staff retirees, and reported on the technical problems existing for those participating remotely.
Suzanne Moore, Pacifica, reported on the housing issue, as well as the requirements to address the crisis and her thoughts on how to best address those dealing with housing issues.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Councilmember Boles stated that she attended her first League of Cities dinner in December where Councilmembers and county leaders in San Mateo County gather to learn what is happening in other cities with hopefully have things to bring back to Pacifica. She thanked former Councilmember O’Neill for taking her under his wing at that event to introduce her. She has been meeting with staff for training in her new role as well as meeting with constituents on a lot of issues. She has also been talking with the Rotary Club; as an international organization, they have taken on climate change as one of their main project goals this year. She stated that she and her husband will be doing a presentation for them next week on net zero construction.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus served the seniors at their New Year’s buffet which was an amazing meal. She spent a lot of time talking to people via email about what was happening, drove around the city, checked to see if there was sand, all the trees down, etc. She tried to stay at home as much as possible as recommended, but there were times when she needed to see what was going on. She went to every county emergency meeting which were very helpful, and they got accurate weather forecasts and they let them know what was going on in the other cities. She felt it was helpful to hear that from the county. She stated that our city provided updates many times a day which was helpful. She thanked everyone, including all city staff, fire, Recology, PG&E, etc., for all their service.
Councilmember Bier echoed the thank yous for everyone, PW, Recology, fire, etc., for pulling together and doing the best they could for our community. She thanked residents on Anza and Arguello for pulling together and mobilizing their neighbors and approaching the city in a respectful, calm, collaborative way and she appreciated that. She also attended all the San Mateo County storm briefing meetings except the last one, and they started during COVID-19 and they had all elected and city managers sharing information with everyone to understand what to do and share with their communities. She enjoyed a break and went to Council of Cities in Colma and she welcomed Councilmember Boles and our new mayor whom she thought will do a great job. She stated that Mary Ann Nihart was a guest and they got to spend time with her. She attended Tom Picolotti’s retirement party after 25 years on the North Coast County Water District Board. She attended the Merry Manor stroll, where it was wonderful to see all the artists in our community come together and go to their homes and see all the art they are producing. She stated that they had the Pacifica Pride meeting and are on our way to raise funds; they are working on the parade and festival and there will be more information coming.
She thanked Councilmember Beckmeyer for helping with that. She listened to Ray Mueller’s
2.a
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 11 January 09, 2023
swearing in and was able to make public comment for him. She spent time with her interns and they went to the movies, had dinner, etc. She rode on the back of a Harley Davidson during the Pacifica Hotrods Christmas toy cruise. She stated it was fun but she will probably go on a truck next time. She stated that part of that was to honor Jeff Shives, a good friend and part of the Pacifica Hotrods for a long time who passed away recently, and she thought about him a lot as he wasn’t able to be with them. She requested to adjourn their meeting in honor of Ron Hansen, who was a man she grew up with since kindergarten and he passed away recently.
She attended his memorial service yesterday, which was well attended, and thanked the Pacifica Moose Lodge. She stated that every person she grew up with was there and it was beautiful. She loves him and will miss him.
Councilmember Beckmeyer stated that having a break was something she also needed. She stated most of the meetings she normally attends were suspended and she was able to spend more time with her family. She stated that during that time, there were some significant storms.
She referred to Councilmember Bier’s report of the tremendous outpouring of information and support from the community on what is going on and what is happening in the neighborhood.
She stated that hearing from them and directly connect them with services is critical; sometimes people contact Council thinking they have more power or authority, etc., but they don’t, in terms of getting the word to the important services that need to hear from the community. She is always giving the police department’s phone number. She had a friend contact her over the weekend because there was a downed line, and she experienced a similar situation on Anza; she was texting staff letting them know and before she even sent it, the Police came and helped. She stated that the services were evident and the coordination was happening. She knows there was a need all over the Bay Area for sandbags, and neighbors in the Anza and Arguello neighborhoods offered part of their property as staging. She was not diminishing the challenges in that neighborhood, but we are much better when we pull together and figure out where the problems are and how we can solve them and what the next steps are. She referred to her committee meetings, stating the Beautification Advisory Committee did not meet. She went to Council of Cities, which was a great opportunity to continuously learn from other communities. She will not be attending the New Mayors and Councilmember Meeting coming up, but she remembers attending right after she was elected.
Mayor Bigstyck began by sending prayers to Ukraine. He welcomed Councilmember Boles. He attended the Council of Cities dinner in Colma and he thought it was amazing to see Mary Ann Nihart. She received a standing ovation and was a guest of one of the attendees and it was heartwarming to see her. He experienced his first city selection committee when a room full of mayors gets together and hashes out various regional boards. He will experience something like that again tomorrow morning. He attended the Jefferson Union High School District board reorganization. He stated that Supervisor Canepa was there and State Senator Scott Weiner was in attendance; he got to see all the new board members and older board members. He attended the Menlo Park reorganization where County Supervisor Ray Mueller had his last meeting following by a nice reception, took a meeting with State Senator Josh Becker, and attended the county reorganization where Supervisor Ray Mueller took his seat along with Supervisor Noelia Corzo. He was struck that, in both instances, our newly elected leaders invoked spirit as a guiding principle in their work and spoke from the heart; hearing those introductions demonstrates how they will lead accordingly with the remaining supervisors who have shown tremendous leadership over the years in our county. He would have stayed longer, but there was a meeting between members of the Arguello community and city staff to figure out the best approach after the flooding event there. He received a message on New Year’s Eve from a resident who has a great deal to say; he was struck immediately as he sent him a twosentence email, that they were flooding and to help Linda Mar. He stated that it made him want
2.a
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 12 January 09, 2023
to go immediately to see the flooding. He connected with PW Director and City Manager to figure out what was going on, and he learned about the failed bypass pump at the Linda Mar pump house that was corrected as quickly as possible to bring the flooding down but not without a simultaneous sanitary sewer overflow. His heart fell in with the neighborhood of Arguello that experienced that way to begin a new year. He understands that it might not have happened if not for that bypass pump failure; he understood we have an emergency pump replacement order, and that can get corrected quickly and will hopefully be enough that, if machinery are operating, we won’t have that kind of flooding hopefully. He stated that they need to investigate various actions they can take in figuring out the viability of implementing our new storm drain master plan they put into effect about a month ago. He hoped that pump replacement solves the problem, and in the long term he intends to bring up at goal setting the need for funding that project. They will be discussing other projects related to the storm drain master plan but he isn’t aware of an SSO (sanitary sewer overflow) that occurred quite the same way that it happened on Arguello, and he stated that might bring up a priority project. It will be discussed at goal setting. He had the opportunity to see our new sheriff, Christina Corpus, being inaugurated with the room filled with all manner of people from law enforcement, military, to other electeds countrywide and so many citizens present to show how happy they were that our new sheriff is in town. He stated it was inspiring as one speaker was someone who had previously been trafficked and had a great deal of substance abuse in her background and, because Sheriff Corpus cared enough to spend time with her and treat her like a human being, she was able to seek the rehabilitation and help she needed to rise the place where she can inspire others. He was inspired, as he thought everyone was, by hearing her story and then hearing Sheriff Corpus describing the kind of compassion, along with law enforcement she wishes to bring into the mix.
He thought we were in very good hands with someone eager to place a positive energy into bringing law enforcement to a place where it can get past the television headlines.
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Woodhouse stated that many councilmembers talked about storm matters, which he was going to talk about as well. His comments are a bit different but touch on some of the same matters. He stated that has been the focus since coming back, during and after the holidays. As was mentioned, we learned a lot during the COVID-19 pandemic on a countywide scale about coordination between agencies, particularly San Mateo County emergency operation center, and that infrastructure was in place to immediately kick into the countywide briefings about what is happening; many councilmembers participated as he did, which was very helpful across the county. He stated that, since December 31, we have had three major storms that led to the proclamation of emergency related to the storms that they ratified at this meeting which he signed last week. He stated that is in place to help facilitate reimbursement of expenditures that the city has incurred during these storms and subsequent ones that may continue coming. He stated that the New Year’s Eve storm brought the largest rainfall and related flooding and, as mentioned, sanitary sewer overflow impacts, particularly in lower Linda Mar due to the volume of rain in a very short time and the failure of that pump. He stated that this storm created the largest ever flow in Pacifica’s history to our wastewater treatment plant with more than 22 million gallons in a 24-hour period. He stated that, on January 3, the fourth storm, or bomb cyclone event, had the largest wind impacts as everyone saw with downed trees and power lines, but not as much as rain as was forecasted. He stated that was followed the following day by incredibly high surf that battered the California coast everywhere, more than in Pacifica, but caused in Pacifica significant loads of water and sand on Beach Boulevard and Clarendon. He stated that the previous night’s storm also brought high winds but less rain again with a pretty good amount of rain, the final total between 2 and 3 inches. He stated that at this point the ground is extremely saturated and continuing rain is expected but as high a volume is
2.a
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 13 January 09, 2023
not predicted at this point. City staff will remain vigilant, as should the community, about trees and signs of any landslides that exist. He stated that it is an ongoing process now. He referred to the system we had in place in initiating the virtual EOC, we didn’t have the need to physically activate the EOC (Emergency Operation Center), where during a big disaster they call staff to get together in one room for complex planning and emergency response run out of the police station conference room which is the EOC room. They had in place the equivalent but more efficient use of staff and city resources which is an emergency command center that North County Fire Authority ran out of their headquarters and we were virtually communicating with everyone. He stated that if functioned extremely well, and a lot of people asked if they opened the EOC and in this case they had the ECC running. There was great communication between fire, PW, police and all of the city management and administration during this time. He thanked all city staff of police, fire, PW, field services and wastewater and PB&R. They had the Community Center on standby if they needed to open it up as a comfort center or temporary shelter for anyone that had been displaced. He stated that city administration and departmental management staff all displayed incredible energy in preparing for and responding to these storms to keep Pacificans as safe as possible; he also highlighted the critical community efforts in being cautious and vigilant about safety issues out there and signing up for San Mateo County alert so they know where road closures are happening and all of that is very important in working as a team together during these difficult emergencies. He also thanked the community for their understanding and patience about the inconvenience that such storms can cause. He stated that the city is continuing to work aggressively on storm drainage and wastewater infrastructure to make Pacifica safer. He stated that Council approved the storm drainage master plan which will serve as a blueprint to guide prioritization of projects and funding searches for the millions of dollars that are needed for such projects. He stated that we are not alone in that search, as stormwater drainage infrastructure is an incredibly challenging area of infrastructure financing for local governments; all the cities share that challenge and concern.
He stated that Council has also approved an aggressive wastewater capital program with corresponding rate increases last year to fund the significant wastewater infrastructure improvements needed. He added that the community supported the half cent transactions and use tax (Measure Y) in November which plays a part here as well as it is a critical financial sustainability measure so the city can maintain our current level of services; without Measure Y, our structural deficit projections in the next storm cycle may have not been able to have as many staff out there responding. In this case, we had all staff working to respond. Measure Y as an ongoing operating funding measure plays an important piece to this public safety and emergency response. He stated more funding has been put into the infrastructure needs in the last five years, probably more than any time previously; it has been an incredible focus of recent Councils and will continue be the focus of him and city staff. They remain committed to these improvements to make Pacifica a sustainable and resilient community into future decades. It will be challenging but they are committed to working on it. He stated that they will see what future weeks bring for storms but he thought chance favors the prepared and that is city’s goal.
Mayor Bigstyck thought the point is well taken that they hopefully get to a point where it doesn’t take a fire in our pump house or an engine going out during a storm before we are able to start rehabilitating our antiquated infrastructure. He thanked staff, police, fire, PW as well as PB&R for the work they did during the storm. He was amazed by all of those departments, as well as what PB&R was doing to coordinate the various programs for young and older people and they play a significant role in what happened during the storms. He was on the county calls that Councilmembers mentioned and he mentioned Nancy McGee, the Superintendent of Public Instruction, and on the county calls she was giving a robust understanding of what was going on in our schools.
2.a
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 14 January 09, 2023
Councilmember Beckmeyer brought up a need for an update as soon as practicable about the creek, i.e., San Pedro Creek, as she received a lot of concern, calls, anxiety about the water levels as they were rising. She stated that there are a lot of backyards that open onto the creek bank and she heard statements made that they are supposed to be clearing the vegetation.
She asked for an update on what the maintenance of the vegetation in the creek area is, what is allowed, as she knows we have Fish and Wildlife and Coastal Commission in parts of that area, but a clear statement she got was that 8-10 years ago there was routinely vegetation being cut back and the impression of some constituents in lower Linda Mar is that has not been happening at the level it should be or to the degree it should be and it would help to stem the flow because it came up to backyards and across to front yards and streets in some of the lower Linda Mar areas on Flores. She asked that question for an appropriate future update and what the resources are that are brought to bear on that issue.
Councilmember Bier thanked her, adding that she got those calls as well.
Mayor Bigstyck called a short recess and then reconvened the meeting.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE
CONSIDERATION
17. 2023 City Council Liaison and Committee Assignments PROPOSED ACTION: Review the list of City Council Liaison and Committee Assignments, make any modifications for the calendar year 2023, and approve the final list.
City Clerk Coffey presented the staff report.
Mayor Bigstyck concluded that, after public comment, they will determine who gets what assignment, and he asked if there were any questions for staff regarding what any of the committees or commissions do.
There were no public comments.
Mayor Bigstyck thought they could go down the list and check them off one by one, beginning with ABAG.
Councilmember Beckmeyer was happy to continue as alternate if Mayor Bigstyck wanted to continue as the ABAG rep.
Mayor Bigstyck then addressed Airport Community Roundtable where former Councilmember O’Neill was serving.
Councilmember Boles was willing to serve as the representative on that committee.
Mayor Bigstyck stated that it is important and involves creative thinking to make heads or tails out of a tricky situation. He continued to CCAG.
Councilmember Beckmeyer stated it was okay with her unless the mayor had an interest in that one.
2.a
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 15 January 09, 2023
Mayor Bigstyck then referred to the Colma Creek Flood Control Citizens Advisory Committee, where former Councilmember O’Neill was an alternative.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated Colma Creek has not been meeting since the flood sea level rise committee. She will stay there if they call a meeting. Because of the flooding, they might.
Mayor Bigstyck asked City Clerk Coffey if she has any insight on whether that committee is still meeting or have they disbanded.
City Clerk Coffey has not heard that they have disbanded, but she believes it is the OneShoreline committee that has been meeting more regularly.
Mayor Bigstyck asked if OneShoreline has taken the place of Colma Creek.
City Clerk Coffey hasn’t heard that Colma Creek has disbanded officially.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus states she will find out.
Mayor Bigstyck asked that they assign an alternate until they know one way or the other as it was former Councilmember O’Neill’s position. Councilmember Boles was okay with filling that alternate position.
Councilmember Bier referred to mention of OneShoreline and asked if there was a liaison for that.
Councilmember Beckmeyer thought it was a Council of Cities vote. She understood that you apply via CCAG and the board makes those choices.
Councilmember Boles didn’t think there were any openings.
Mayor Bigstyck referred to Emergency Services Council of San Mateo County which shows him as backup and asked if Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus was okay being in the appointed position.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated that was good.
Mayor Bigstyck stated that on the Fog Fest Committee, former Councilmember O’Neill was the alternate. He asked if Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus was okay being the liaison.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated she will stay there.
Mayor Bigstyck asked who wanted to be the alternate, asking now often they met.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated not often, but they meet more often when it gets closer to the date, and they usually call before a scheduled meeting.
Mayor Bigstyck concluded it was a loose schedule. He asked who had an interest.
Councilmember Beckmeyer stated that she didn’t know if she would be needed but she was happy to fill in as an alternate.
2.a
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 16 January 09, 2023
Mayor Bigstyck stated that, for HEART, it is Councilmembers Bier and Vaterlaus, and he thought at city selections on the following day they will be designating some candidates for HEART. He asked Councilmember Bier if she can help him understand the difference between the HEART positions the city is assigning tomorrow and the position on this list.
Councilmember Bier stated she could not.
City Clerk Coffey stated that what is on the agenda on the City Selection Committee is the HEART board members and what is on this list is the HEART member agency committees (or MAC) that is designating councilmember representatives from each of the cities in San Mateo County for this member agency committee. Typically, this committee meets maybe one or twice a year to review the budget for HEART. It is less involved than participation of a HEART board member.
Mayor Bigstyck asked if that is because each agency pays into it.
City Clerk Coffey confirmed that it is member supporting agencies.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus, Councilmember Bier, and Mayor Bigstyck discussed the role.
Councilmember Boles asked if she is appointed, would someone else take the alternate.
Councilmember Bier stated that it is a different board.
Mayor Bigstyck and Councilmember Bier confirmed HOPE was to remain as is.
Mayor Bigstyck referred to the Articulation Committee and stated that former Councilmember O’Neill was with Councilmember Bier.
Councilmember Bier confirmed that they both attended.
Mayor Bigstyck stated that Councilmember Beckmeyer expressed an interest in this one.
Councilmember Beckmeyer wanted to talk about it. She raised the question when she was discussing these positions with the Mayor about the fact that she worked for Pacifica School District and that was brought forward originally as a reason for her not to be part of this articulation committee. Then she stated that both Councilmembers Bier and O’Neill worked for Jefferson Union High School District and Councilmember Bier worked on a project that paid out through PSD. She wanted to discuss as to whether there is any issue there.
Councilmember Bier didn’t think there is, adding that she thought it makes it a richer conversation. She asked the City Manager for his opinion.
City Manager Woodhouse stated that it was hard to say, as former Councilmember O’Neill is a bit removed in the role he played for JUHSD and he thought it would depend on issues. They have two board of trustees and the superintendent who participate. He didn’t think there were any legal or technical conflicts but depend on issues discussed.
Councilmember Beckmeyer stated that she would like to volunteer for participating on that one.
Mayor Bigstyck stated that he will throw one more argument into the works to see if that
2.a
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 17 January 09, 2023
changes anything. He heard that it was a joint articulation with the Water District and the School District, and he asked, if the two representatives from Council also have a school district perspective, whether they feel there is any loss by having a non-school district perspective as part of the city perspective.
Councilmember Bier asked for clarification.
Mayor Bigstyck questioned, if all the perspectives on the Joint Articulation are school district, whether they thought there was any value by having another perspective coming from the city that is not school-oriented.
Councilmember Bier thought their newly formed relationship with the Water District is important and that was the only thing she was thinking of when he asked the question. She stated that they both worked hard on that, and she thought they were well represented all the way around.
Mayor Bigstyck concluded that, if Councilmember Beckmeyer was present, she would feel that there is no loss of alternative perspectives.
Councilmember Bier didn’t, unless there are others who are interested in the position.
Councilmember Boles stated that she was willing to serve, but she didn’t have a burning desire.
Councilmember Beckmeyer stated that she did, but she was willing to step aside if Councilmember Boles wanted to do it.
Councilmember Bier encouraged her to speak up about her burning desire.
Mayor Bigstyck thought they have that one confirmed. He was hoping to assign a North Coast County Water District liaison of some sort; he doesn’t see that on this list currently, but he would like to make it a regular place on the list. He would like a councilmember to attend the meetings regularly so that they report at Council meetings. When he attended one of their meetings, he learned what the Water District was doing for the first time in the two years on Council, if not the almost 40 years he has lived in Pacifica; it was illustrative, and it would be great to have that knowledge base coming back to help them inform their perspective.
Councilmember Bier agreed.
Mayor Bigstyck would love it to be regularly placed on this list. He asked if there were any legal reasons why they could not do that.
City Manager Woodhouse stated that he was discussing it with Asst. City Attorney Bazzano. It is a new addition, and they make that suggestion; when they do the motions for the entire list, Council can approve that at the end, rather than a stand-alone motion to add it and vote on it.
Mayor Bigstyck asked if it was a motion that comes back later or a motion they make at the end.
City Manager Woodhouse stated that, at the end, they will move to adopt the assignments and include that additional liaison assignment.
Councilmember Beckmeyer asked if anyone know exactly when their meetings are.
2.a
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 18 January 09, 2023
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated Wednesday, January 18, is their next meeting.
Councilmember Beckmeyer concluded that it is the third Wednesday of the month.
Mayor Bigstyck stated it is the same night as OSPAC and Emergency Preparedness.
Councilmember Boles suggested they do the others first and see who is free.
Councilmember Bier agreed with that.
Mayor Bigstyck stated that they will circle back. He then addressed the North County Fire Authority. He would like to continue serving on that board and Councilmember Beckmeyer expressed interest in joining him.
Councilmember Beckmeyer did, but was ready to discuss if anyone else is interested.
Councilmember Boles stated she is interested in that one.
Councilmember Bier was not interested in it.
Councilmember Boles stated that she has been digging in a lot on the General Plan fire issues and with CalFire as well, and she would love to keep learning and follow up on those issues.
Mayor Bigstyck stated that they meet once a year to reaffirm that we want to maintain the JPA and ask questions of the fire chief when he is in front of them. He offered those questions in advance so he can prepare as it is usually just to reaffirm that they want to maintain the JPA.
Mayor Bigstyck, Councilmember Beckmeyer, and Councilmember Boles discussed who would join with him. Mayor Bigstyck concluded that Councilmember Boles is the choice.
Mayor Bigstyck stated that they are at PCT, and he thought Councilmember Bier expressed interest in taking over former Councilmember O’Neill’s spot.
Councilmember Bier responded that she did.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated she will stay as the alternate.
Mayor Bigstyck asked, regarding the Pacific Beach Coalition, if Councilmember Bier desired to stay as the primary representative, as he knows Councilmember Boles has some interest.
Councilmember Bier was fine to give that up as she participates enough with the school district.
Mayor Bigstyck asked if she wants to remain as the alternative.
Councilmember Bier stated that she was okay with being the alternate.
Mayor Bigstyck referred to PRC, stating that he would like to remain as the representative, and he thought Councilmember Bier would like to remain as the alternate.
Councilmember Bier responded that she would.
2.a
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 19 January 09, 2023
Mayor Bigstyck referred to the Pacifica School Volunteers, with Councilmembers Bier and Beckmeyer.
Councilmember Beckmeyer agreed to leave it as is.
Mayor Bigstyck referred to the Peninsula Clean Energy JPA, stating he was the representative for that agency and would like to stay in that position. He asked Councilmember Bier if she would like to push her alternate seat to Councilmember Boles.
Councilmember Bier agreed to that.
Councilmember Boles appreciated that.
Mayor Bigstyck referred to Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance (Commute.org) and stated former Councilmember O’Neill was the primary. He asked if anyone had a burning desire to be the representative.
Councilmember Boles asked if she could learn more.
Councilmember Bier asked input from Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated that she only went to one of those meetings.
Councilmember Bier thought former Councilmember O’Neill came back with a better knowledge of SamTrans in general.
Mayor Bigstyck thought, after former Councilmember O’Neill came back from those meetings, he would have interesting ideas to through into the mix as he appeared to learn a lot from those meetings to apply to other issues that were going on in Pacifica.
Councilmember Boles asked if it was mostly SamTrans.
Councilmember Beckmeyer referred to some of the issues they address.
Councilmember Boles stated she was willing to take this as it is just quarterly.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus confirmed that their address is listed as South City.
Mayor Bigstyck, Councilmember Bier, and Councilmember Boles discussed the meetings further. Mayor Bigstyck confirmed that Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus is the alternate.
Mayor Bigstyck then referred to SMC JPA Advanced Life Support/Pre-Hospital Emergency, where former Councilmember O’Neill was the alternate.
Councilmember Beckmeyer stated that she will keep the liaison position if anyone wants to jump in as the alternate. She stated that, while there are usually two meetings listed, the last couple of years, it has been moved down to one meeting with one canceled. As an example, the January 2022 meeting was canceled.
Mayor Bigstyck asked Councilmember Boles if she would want the alternate position.
2.a
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 20 January 09, 2023
Councilmember Boles agreed to being the alternate.
Mayor Bigstyck referred to the SMC Library JPA and stated he has been attending the meetings as former Councilmember O’Neill’s backup regularly over the past year, as the library is important to him and he is learning what he can in the alternate role. He would appreciate taking the lead role and looked to Councilmember Beckmeyer.
Councilmember Beckmeyer suggested that she be the alternate and they participate together.
Mayor Bigstyck stated that it sounds good to him, and asked if everyone else was in agreement.
City Clerk Coffey stated, before moving on, she would like to confirm the placements of selections are correct and they aren’t missing any on other agencies.
Mayor Bigstyck clarified if she is verifying the list as is.
Commissioner Beckmeyer referred to Congestion Management and asked if they talked about that previously.
Mayor Bigstyck stated that they were talking about Commute.org previously and this one referred to CCAG.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated that you usually run for that position and someone would run for that position and take Councilmember O’Neill’s spot.
City Clerk Coffey thought it was because former Councilmember O’Neill was in that position for the CCAG congestion management and until a Councilmember from Pacifica is appointed by CCAG, that would come off of the list for 2023.
Councilmember Bier stated that it wasn’t on the list.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated that there are a lot of other positions where people came off.
Councilmember Boles thought it was on the list as she talked to him about it and it is on Mondays before Council meetings and it is a problem if they have to be present early.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated that was also a problem with One Shoreline.
City Manager Woodhouse stated that the full name of it is the congestion management and environmental quality committee, and he saw an announcement for that.
Councilmember Boles thought the same.
Councilmember Beckmeyer stated that it was the one at the beginning of December.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated that they are voting on it on Thursday for CCAG.
Mayor Bigstyck stated that there were two regional voting bodies, one being city selection that he serves on and one being CCAG which Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus gets to serve on. He understood that Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus still serves on CCAG’s legislative committee in San Mateo County Recovery Council.
2.a
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 21 January 09, 2023
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus confirmed.
Mayor Bigstyck confirmed that Councilmember Beckmeyer still serves on CCAG Resource Management and Climate Protection Committee and the LCC Coastal Cities Group.
Councilmember Beckmeyer confirmed.
Mayor Bigstyck referred to Beautification Advisory Committee, asking Councilmembers Beckmeyer and Bier if they were happy where they are.
Councilmember Bier and Beckmeyer confirmed they would stay.
Mayor Bigstyck referred to the Economic Development Committee, and asked confirmation from Councilmembers Beckmeyer and Bier.
Councilmember Beckmeyer and Councilmember Bier confirmed.
Mayor Bigstyck referred to Emergency Preparedness and Safety Committee, with former Councilmember O’Neill as the alternate. He will request being placed on OSPAC in a couple of spots down and that would preclude him from being on Emergency Preparedness or attending NCCWD. He stated that Councilmember Boles had expressed an interest in doing Emergency Preparedness.
Councilmember Boles stated that she did, as well as an interest in OSPAC.
Mayor Bigstyck stated that he would like to take the lead on OSPAC.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus asked if they meet the same night.
Commissioner Boles stated that they did and she was happy to do one.
Mayor Bigstyck stated that he knows she wants to do OSPAC.
Councilmember Bier stated that she can be the alternate on OSPAC.
Councilmember Boles stated not if she has another meeting. She stated that she was happy to learn about emergency.
Mayor Bigstyck thought, with doing the countywide one is also an alternate, they are compliant with each other. He asked who would like to be alternate for Emergency Preparedness.
Councilmember Beckmeyer, Councilmember Bier, Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus, and Mayor Bigstyck discussed the alternate. Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated that she will be the alternate.
Mayor Bigstyck referred to the Library Advisory Committee, and he stated that they discussed earlier that they want to team up all things library.
City Clerk Coffey asked, before they move on, that they clarify the primary and alternate for Emergency Preparedness.
2.a
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 22 January 09, 2023
Mayor Bigstyck stated primary is Commissioner Boles and secondary is Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus. He stated that he and Councilmember Beckmeyer are on Library Advisory Committee.
Mayor Bigstyck then stated that they are now on OSPAC, and Councilmember Bier expressed her intention to be the liaison to North Coast County Water District. He would like to fill that slot, given the work plan they agreed on during goal setting last year. He wanted to become more aware of the dynamics in OSPAC and appreciated the opportunity to have a more robust understanding of what they are asking us in terms of changing their charter. He mentioned that Councilmember Beckmeyer was the alternate.
Councilmember Beckmeyer stated that she has the time free and can do it.
Mayor Bigstyck stated he should be able to make all the meetings.
Mayor Bigstyck then referred to the ad hoc assignments.
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus mentioned the one where former Councilmember O’Neill was on but it is concluded. Councilmember Beckmeyer stated that it was the City Council Rules and Ethics subcommittee, which said it was done. Mayor Bigstyck asked if they will have it brought back to Council soon. City Manager Woodhouse stated that the Council Rules and Code of Ethics is tentatively scheduled for next Council meeting or the meeting after.
The Councilmembers reviewed their assignments. They confirmed for North Coast County Water District, Councilmember Bier was active and Councilmember Beckmeyer was alternate Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated, because there was a lengthy discussion, she recommended that they open it up to public comment again regarding their discussion, then take the vote.
Mayor Bigstyck reopened public comment and, seeing no one, closed public comment.
City Clerk Coffey suggested that she reads through the list as concluded in deliberations before they entertain a motion. She then read the list of assignments.
Councilmember Bier and Councilmember Boles discussed the Pacifica Community Television assignment. Councilmember Bier confirmed she will keep it.
City Clerk Coffey continued reading the assignments.
City Manager Woodhouse stated that they are also adding the North Coast County Water District.
City Clerk Coffey stated that it is a non-voting, attending board meetings on the third Wednesday of the month and the primary will be Councilmember Bier with alternate being Councilmember Beckmeyer, to attend the meetings and report back to City Council.
2.a
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 23 January 09, 2023
AGENCY Council
Representative(s)
Council Alternate
ABAG General Assembly Delegate BIGSTYCK BECKMEYER
Airport Community Roundtable BOLES VATERLAUS
C/CAG Representative VATERLAUS BECKMEYER
Colma Creek Flood Control Citizens Advisory
Committee
VATERLAUS BOLES
Emergency Services Council SMC VATERLAUS BIGSTYCK
Fog Fest Committee Liaison VATERLAUS BECKMEYER
Housing Endowment and Regional Trust
(HEART) - Member Agency Committee (MAC)
VATERLAUS BIER
Housing Our People Effectively (HOPE) - Inter
Agency Council (IAC)
BIER VATERLAUS
Joint School Dist./Water Dist./City Articulation
Committee
BIER &
BECKMEYER
North County Fire Authority JPA BIGSTYCK &
BOLES
North Coast County Water District (NCCWD) BIER BECKMEYER Pacifica Community Television BIER VATERLAUS
Pacific Beach Coalition BOLES BIER
Pacifica Resource Center BIGSTYCK BIER
Pacifica School Volunteers BIER BECKMEYER
Peninsula Clean Energy JPA BIGSTYCK BOLES
Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance
(Commute.org)
BOLES VATERLAUS
SMC JPA Advanced Life Support / Pre-Hospital
Emergency
BECKMEYER BOLES
SMC Library JPA BIGSTYCK BECKMEYER
* Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) To be determined NONE * C/CAG Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory BIER
2.a
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 24 January 09, 2023
Committee
* C/CAG Legislative Committee VATERLAUS
* C/CAG Resource Management & Climate
Protection Committee (RMCP)
BECKMEYER
* Housing Endowment and Regional Trust
(HEART) - Regular Member Board of Directors
To be determined
*LCC Coastal Cities Group (CCG) Leadership
Committee (through 12/31/2022)
BECKMEYER
*San Mateo County Recovery Council VATERLAUS
CITY OF PACIFICA COMMITTEES /
COMMISSIONS:
Beautification Advisory Committee BECKMEYER BIER
Economic Development Committee BECKMEYER &
BIER
Emergency Preparedness & Safety Commission BOLES VATERLAUS Library Advisory Committee BECKMEYER &
BIGSTYCK
Open Space Parkland Advisory Committee BIGSTYCK BECKMEYER City Council Ad Hoc Subcommittees:
2023 Pride Planning Ad Hoc Subcommittee BIER &
BECKMEYER
N/A
Council Chambers Renovations Ad Hoc
Subcommittee (informal)
BIER &
BECKMEYER
N/A
* Representative selected by listed Agency not City Council Mayor Bigstyck asked if they have a motion.
Councilmember Bier moved to approve the appointments as amended; seconded by Councilmember Beckmeyer.
City Clerk Coffey took a vote by verbal roll call.
2.a
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 25 January 09, 2023
RESULT: ADOPTED AS AMENDED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
SECONDER: Sue Beckmeyer, Councilmember
AYES: Bigstyck, Vaterlaus, Beckmeyer, Bier, Boles
ADJOURN
Mayor Bigstyck stated that Councilmember Bier asked that the meeting be adjourned in honor of Ron Hansen and he asked if she wanted to say a word or two about him before adjourning in his honor.
Councilmember Bier stated that he was a lifetime Pacifican and that he probably worked on everyone’s car in Pacifica and never asked to be paid. He was a generous, loving father.
Mayor Bigstyck adjourned the meeting at 9:45 p.m., in honor of Ron Hansen.
Transcribed by Barbara Medina, Public Meeting Stenographer.
Respectfully Submitted,
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
__________________________
Tygarjas Bigstyck, Mayor
2.a
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 01-09-2023 Regular Meeting (5252 : Approval of Minutes)
CITY OF PACIFICA
COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/23/2023
1 SUBJECT:
Merge three (3) current separate PB&R Supervisor job specifications documents (Childcare, Food/Senior Services, and Recreation/Aquatics) into one (1) comprehensive Recreation Supervisor job specification document
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt a resolution to merge and update the job specifications for Parks, Beaches & Recreation Childcare Supervisor, Food/Senior Services Supervisor, and Recreation/Aquatics Supervisor, into one (1) job specification title document, Recreation Supervisor STAFF CONTACT:
Bob Palacio, Director Parks, Beaches and Recreation
650-738-7382
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department (PB&R) currently has three (3) Recreation Supervisor areas of responsibility which are covered by 4 supervisors. Those areas are Childcare (2), Food/Senior Services, and Recreation/Aquatics. Each of these positions holds the same classification and salary range.
Currently, each of the supervisor positions has its own job specification document with the positions area of responsibility (Childcare, Food/Senior Services, Recreation/Aquatics heading the position title. In addition, the job specifications need updating which will better define the knowledge and skill sets necessary for these positions in 2023 forward.
Upon review, the supervisory positions within PB&R should all be titled as Recreation Supervisor positions. They will then have a secondary title which will further identify the Recreation Supervisors area(s) of responsibility. This will benefit the department in all supervisory position recruitment processes as the title, Recreation Supervisor, is better aligned with position titles within the Parks and Recreation profession.
The proposed Recreation Supervisor job specification has been reviewed and approved by local 350 union leadership.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact as the salary ranges for these positions are all equal and remain the same.
ORIGINATED BY:
Parks, Beaches & Recreation Department
3 Packet Pg. 241
Pacifica City Council 2
January 23, 2023
Human Resources
ATTACHMENT LIST:
Attachment A: Parks, Beaches and Recreation; Recreation Supervisor Job Specification (PDF) 3 Packet Pg. 242
Pacifica City Council 3
January 23, 2023
RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA
AUTHORIZING THE MERGE AND UPDATE OF THE PARKS BEACHES & RECREATION
SUPERVISOR JOB SPECIFICATION
WHEREAS, Article 4, Section 2-5.403 of the Pacifica Municipal Code establishes a civil service personnel system and procedures for the administration of personnel matters; and
WHEREAS, said Chapter requires that the City Manager, as Personnel Officer, prepare and recommend to the City Council a position classification plan, class specifications, and revisions thereto; and
WHEREAS the Parks, Beaches and Recreation supervisory positions be merged and updated under one document titled Recreation Supervisor classification to achieve greater efficiencies and assist with the recruitment efforts.
WHEREAS staff met and conferred in good faith with the representative of Teamsters Local 350 and they are in agreement with the changes NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, that the three (3) current job specifications for the Parks, Beaches, and Recreations supervisory positions be merged and updated to one (1) job specification under the title Recreation Supervisor (enclosed in Attachment 1), with no change to the current salary schedule.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 23rd day of January, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES, Councilmembers:
NOES, Councilmembers:
ABSENT, Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
Tygarjas Bigstyck, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ______________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney Recreation Supervisor Recreation Supervisor
Current Scale Proposed Scale
$7,747 - $8,910 $7,747 - $8,910
3 Packet Pg. 243
1 This class specification should not be interpreted as all inclusive. It is intended to identify the essential functions and requirements of this job. Incumbents may be requested to perform job-related responsibilities and tasks other than those stated in this specification.
DEFINITION
Under general direction from the Director of Parks Beaches and Recreation and/or the Recreation Manager, the Recreation Supervisor plans, organizes, promotes, budgets, schedules, directs, evaluates, and coordinates the activities and operations of the Recreation Division including but not limited to the following program areas:
• Recreation/Aquatic
• Seniors Services
• Childcare
The Recreation Supervisor is also responsible for leading and/or assisting special programs/events, special projects related to the divisions mission, hires, and trains staff.
.
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS
The Recreation Supervisor is a direct supervisory level class responsible for maximizing service delivery to the community by supervising staff, facility and custodial operations, programs, services, and activities of program areas and affiliated facilities. Performance requires the use of independent thinking, initiative, and discretion.
This Recreation Supervisor classification is distinguished from the Department Manager in that the latter is responsible for strategic planning and management of All department recreation programs and facility operations.
The Recreation Supervisor classification is distinguished from the Recreation Coordinator in that the Supervisor performs more detailed and technical assignments/projects requiring specialized skill on an independent basis.
RECREATION SUPERVISOR
Scenic Pacifica
Incorporated Nov. 22, 1957
3.a
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Attachment A: Parks, Beaches and Recreation; Recreation Supervisor Job Specification (5255 : Resolution to Update Job 2 ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS – RECREATION/AQUATICS SUPERVISOR:
Essential responsibilities and duties may include, but are not limited to, the following:
Plan, supervise, and coordinate a variety of programs and activities within the designated supervisory assignment of recreation and aquatics.
Select, train, motivate and supervise staff and volunteers; work with employees to correct deficiencies, and when appropriate implement discipline.
Participate in the development and implementation of goals, objectives, policies and priorities; recommend and implement resulting policies and procedures.
Inspect, evaluate, and recommend changes in operations and activities of assigned programs and personnel to maintain quality and quantity; assess community needs and maintain good community relations; review with appropriate management staff; and implement improvements.
Direct, coordinate and review the work plan for assigned recreation services and activities; assign work activities and projects; monitor workflow; review and revaluate work products, methods and procedures; conduct staff meetings to plan and evaluate program content, techniques, and problem areas and resolve problems.
Work cooperatively with other program supervisors and outside agencies and organizations to plan and implement special events.
Participate in the development and administration of assigned program budget; forecast funds needed for staffing, equipment, materials and supplies; monitor and approve expenditures; recommend adjustments as necessary; handle funds in accordance with City policies and procedures.
Contract for services with instructors and vendors; process payments.
Prepare news releases, social media posts, reports, and studies; manage website content
Manage the Jean E. Brink Aquatics Center, aquatics staff and programs, and sports facilities within the PB&R scope of responsibility.
3.a
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Attachment A: Parks, Beaches and Recreation; Recreation Supervisor Job Specification (5255 : Resolution to Update Job 3 ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS – SENIOR SERVICES SUPERVISOR:
Essential responsibilities and duties may include, but are not limited to, the following:
Plan, supervise, and coordinate a variety of programs and activities within the designated supervisory assignment of senior services including food programs and transportation.
Select, train, motivate and supervise staff and volunteers; work with employees to correct deficiencies, and when appropriate implement discipline.
Participate in the development and implementation of goals, objectives, policies and priorities; recommend and implement resulting policies and procedures.
Inspect, evaluate, and recommend changes in operations and activities of assigned programs and personnel to maintain quality and quantity; assess community needs and maintain good community relations; review with appropriate management staff; and implement improvements.
Direct, coordinate and review the work plan for assigned senior services and activities; assign work activities and projects; monitor workflow; review and revaluate work products, methods and procedures; conduct staff meetings to plan and evaluate program content, techniques, and problem areas and resolve problems.
Work cooperatively with other program supervisors and outside agencies and organizations to plan and implement special events.
Participate in the development and administration of assigned program budget; forecast funds needed for staffing, equipment, materials and supplies; monitor and approve expenditures; recommend adjustments as necessary; handle funds in accordance with city policies and procedures.
Contract for services with instructors and vendors; process payments.
Prepare news releases, social media posts, reports, and studies; manage website content relative to senior programs and services Responsible for planning and coordinating all operations of the Seniors in Action program. Meet regularly with the Senior Advisory Board.
3.a
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Attachment A: Parks, Beaches and Recreation; Recreation Supervisor Job Specification (5255 : Resolution to Update Job 4 Maintain relationships with San Mateo County agencies, provide statistical information when required, research and submit grant applications, coordinate fundraising, process invoices, and oversees volunteer development/recruitment.
Prepare monthly reports for senior programs with the assistance of the Food Service Coordinator, Community Services Coordinator, Senior Program/Events Coordinator, and Transportation Specialist
FOOD SERVICES PROGRAM:
Supervise staff that provides the storage, preparation, and serving of hot food in accordance with the prescribed requirements; assist in food preparation when necessary; oversee staff in conducting inventory’s on both the in-house senior lunch program and Meals on Wheels program. Serve Safe Certification required.
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS – CHILDCARE SUPERVISOR:
Essential responsibilities and duties may include, but are not limited to, the following:
Must have a current Child Development Program Director Permit for CTC (California Commission of Teacher Credentialing). This allows the supervisor the ability to supervise multiple locations.
Must have knowledge of Department of Education, Child Development Division guidelines, early childhood development, basic child psychology, and appropriate health and safety codes.
Leads in planning, organizing, developing, scheduling, enforcing rules, and evaluating childcare programs and special events, as well as overseeing day to day operations of each of the childcare locations.
Leads staff recruitment and hiring, training, supervising, scheduling and evaluating full-time, part-time, and seasonal personnel; assigns work schedules.
Conducts and attends a variety of training seminars, staff meetings, community and recreation meetings as needed.
Maintains inventory of supplies and equipment; distributes supplies and equipment, orders supplies and equipment for Childcare and its facilities.
3.a
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Attachment A: Parks, Beaches and Recreation; Recreation Supervisor Job Specification (5255 : Resolution to Update Job 5 Assists the department with public relations duties such as preparing and distributing flyers, press releases, brochures, website content, and social media posts.
Researches and prepares studies, reports, and memorandum on related childcare subjects.
Utilizes database management, and specialized recreation software NoHo Processes and records applicable program area revenues.
Facilitates the preparation and administration of applicable federal, state, and county special project grants.
Prepares and administers individual program budgets. Monitors expenditures and payroll in accordance with established procedures.
Serves on internal and external committees and boards as requested.
Performs related duties and responsibilities as assigned.
KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES (All Rec Supervisor Positions) Knowledge/Skills in:
• Meeting federal, state, local, and department regulations; enforce and apply all laws, rules and regulations; read, understand and interpret standard official legal documents.
• Exercising judgment and discretion in analyzing and resolving problems; read, correct and prepare clear and concise reports; give and follow written and oral instructions.
• Maintaining cooperative working relationships; demonstrate sensitivity to, and respect for a diverse population.
Ability to:
• Maintain complex records, summarize written material, and interpret a variety of documents, including contracts and ordinances. • Communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing.
3.a
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Attachment A: Parks, Beaches and Recreation; Recreation Supervisor Job Specification (5255 : Resolution to Update Job 6 • Establish and maintain cooperative working relationships with those contacted in the course of work.
• Deal effectively with the public, including special groups such as the elderly and disabled.
• Understand and follow oral and written directions.
• Is flexible and can handle stressful situations.
• Use tact, discretion, initiative, and independent judgment within established guidelines.
• Recognize and appropriately handle materials in a sensitive and confidential manner.
• Ability to organize work, set priorities, meet critical deadlines and follow up on assignments with a minimum of direction.
• Ability to read, communicate to others the policies, procedure, statutes, local rules, codes and regulations pertaining to assigned programs and functions.
• Operate a variety of office equipment.
• Exercise sound judgement
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED (CHILDCARE SUPERVISOR)
Education:
• An Associate’s Degree with 24 semester units of Early Childhood Development/Child Development
Experience:
• Three (3) years of increasingly responsible experience in leading, teaching, and/or supervising Early Childhood or Licensed Childcare programs.
Licenses and/or Certifications:
• Valid California Class C Driver’s License and a good driving record, at the time of appointment.
• Child Development Program Director Permit (from CCTC)
DESIRED QUALIFICATIONS
• Bachelor’s Degree in Child Development or equivalent preferred
3.a
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Attachment A: Parks, Beaches and Recreation; Recreation Supervisor Job Specification (5255 : Resolution to Update Job 7 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED (SENIOR SERVICES SUPERVISOR) Education:
• Equivalent to graduation from an accredited four-year college or university with major course work in recreation, or a related field.
Experience:
• Three years of increasingly responsible, professional recreation and/or human services experience, or a related field.
Licenses and/or Certifications:
• Valid California Class C Driver’s License and a good driving record, at the time of appointment.
DESIRED QUALIFICATIONS
• Bachelor’s Degree in Parks and Recreation, Business Admin, or equivalent
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED (RECREATION/AQUATICS
SUPERVISOR)
Education:
• Equivalent to graduation from an accredited four-year college or university with major course work in recreation, or a related field.
Experience:
• Three years of increasingly responsible, professional recreation and/or human services experience, or a related field.
Licenses and/or Certifications:
• Possession of a valid California driver's license and a satisfactory driving record. Possession of, or ability to obtain, first aid and CPR certificates prior to completion of probation.
DESIRED QUALIFICATIONS
• Bachelor’s Degree in Parks and Recreation, Business Admin or equivalent
3.a
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Attachment A: Parks, Beaches and Recreation; Recreation Supervisor Job Specification (5255 : Resolution to Update Job 8 MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT USED
Modern office equipment, personal computer and applications, (i.e. Word, Excel, Publisher, Power Point, Adobe Acrobat, Zoom Virtual Conferencing, Microsoft Teams, social media platforms such as Nextdoor, Facebook, Twitter, etc.)
PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS
Must possess mobility to use standard recreation/office equipment, including a computer; strength to lift and carry office and recreation materials weighing up to 35 pounds and to reach and stoop to participate in recreational activities; vision to read printed materials and a computer screen; and hearing and speech to communicate in person and over the telephone.
WORKING CONDITIONS
While performing the essential functions of this classification the employee will work in an office environment and be mobile between multiple locations as required. The employee must be able to complete specific administrative tasks while maintaining availability to public for inquires and adequate response to stressful situations.
Adopted Date:
Status: Exempt
Proposed Revision: January 23, 2022
Bargaining Unit: Teamsters Local 350
Compensation: $92,964 - $106,920
________________________________________________________________ NOTE: Any essential function or requirement of this class will be evaluated as necessary should an incumbent/applicant be unable to perform the function or requirement due to a disability as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Reasonable accommodation for the specific disability will be made for the incumbent/applicant when possible.
3.a
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Attachment A: Parks, Beaches and Recreation; Recreation Supervisor Job Specification (5255 : Resolution to Update Job
CITY OF PACIFICA
COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/23/2023
1 SUBJECT:
Adoption of Resolution Authorizing Investment of Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Move to adopt the resolution to update and replace authorized signers on the City of Pacifica's Local Agency Investment Fund through the State of California Treasury Department.
STAFF CONTACT:
Mario Xuereb, Financial Analyst II
[email protected]
Lucy Xie, Deputy Finance Director
[email protected]
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION:
The City has recently completed a series of recruitments and successfully filled vacancies in the Finance Department. These personnel changes need to be formally recognized by the State Treasury Department for use of the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), which is the City’s primary investment pool. This attached resolution acknowledges the new staff contacts as authorized signers for use of the City of Pacifica's existing accounts with LAIF.
This access will allow more efficient movement of funds between our general bank accounts and the LAIF investment account to maximize the return of investments through the higher interest rates available through LAIF. This action will also keep the City compliant with the internal control and records management policies.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
No reasonable alternative
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with updating banking information with financial institutions.
ORIGINATED BY:
Finance Department
ATTACHMENT LIST:
4 Packet Pg. 252
Pacifica City Council 2
January 23, 2023
4 Packet Pg. 253
Pacifica City Council 3
January 23, 2023
RESOLUTION NO. _____
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA AUTHORIZING
INVESTMENT OF MONIES IN THE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND WHEREAS, The Local Agency Investment Fund is established in the State Treasury under Government Code section 16429.1 et. seq. for the deposit of money of a local agency for purposes of investment by the State Treasurer; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that the deposit and withdrawal of money in the Local Agency Investment Fund in accordance with Government Code section 16429.1 et. seq. for the purpose of investment as provided therein is in the best interests of the City of Pacifica;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorizes the deposit and withdrawal of City of Pacifica monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury in accordance with Government Code section 16429.1 et. seq. for the purpose of investment as provided therein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, as follows:
Section 1. The following City of Pacifica officers holding the title(s) specified hereinbelow or their successors in office are each hereby authorized to order the deposit or withdrawal of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund and may execute and deliver any and all documents necessary or advisable in order to effectuate the purposes of this resolution and the transactions contemplated hereby:
Yulia Carter Lucy Xie Mario Xuereb
Assistant City Manager Deputy Finance Director Financial Analyst II ___________________ ____________________ ___________________ Signature Signature Signature
Section 2. This resolution shall remain in full force and effect until rescinded by City Council by resolution and a copy of the resolution rescinding this resolution is filed with the State Treasurer’s Office.
PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Pacifica of the State of California held on the 23rd day of January, 2023 by the following vote:
AYES, Councilmembers:
NOES, Councilmembers:
4 Packet Pg. 254
Pacifica City Council 4
January 23, 2023
ABSENT, Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
CITY OF PACIFICA
Tygarjas Twyrls Bigstyck, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 4 Packet Pg. 255
CITY OF PACIFICA
COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/23/2023
1 SUBJECT:
Accept the City of Pacifica's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) and related financial reports for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Accept the City of Pacifica Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR), Independent Auditor’s Report, and other related financial reports for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022.
STAFF CONTACT:
Yulia Carter, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director (650) 501-6004
[email protected]
Lucy Xie, Deputy Finance Director
(650) 738-7395
[email protected]
BACKGROUND:
The City of Pacifica annually conducts an independent audit of financial transactions and issues the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR), previously known as Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFR) prepared by the City’s independent auditing firm and the Finance staff. The attached ACFR report reflects the City's financial position as of June 30, 2022 and is presented as an informational item for the Council’s acceptance.
The ACFR Report has been prepared in conformity with the Governmental Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards and with the Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement 34, which requires dual perspective financial statements. The ACFR report provides two views of the financial statements: 1) an entity-wide view of the City’s financial transactions that distinguishes between governmental activities and business activities, which is prepared on a full accrual basis of accounting, and 2) a governmental fund view of the results of operations and financial position of each of the City’s major funds, which is prepared on a modified accrual basis of accounting.
The independent auditing firm of Maze and Associates (Maze) has completed the City’s fiscal year 2021-22 audit in conformity with General Accepted Auditing Standards. Those standards require that an independent Certified Public Accounting firm (the auditors) is tasked to plan and perform the audit, examine evidence to support the amounts and disclosure in the financial statements, and express an opinion on the fairness of the presentation of the financial position and the results of operations of the basic financial statements of the City, in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) as applicable to local governments.
The ACFR report has been prepared by Maze & Associates and Finance Department staff. The 2022 ACFR received an unqualified opinion from the auditing firm, which means that it is the opinion of the auditors that the ACFR report represents fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the City as of June 30, 2022, and that the financial statements were prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The auditors noted no 5 Packet Pg. 256
Pacifica City Council 2
January 23, 2023
material weaknesses or deficiencies. In performing an audit of the financial statements, the auditors also considered the City’s internal controls over financial reporting to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate for the purpose of expressing opinions on the financial statements. The auditors did not find any internal control deficiencies and issued a clean opinion.
The City’s ACFR presents an easily readable and organized report of the City’s financial transactions and provides the users of government financial statements with a wide variety of information needed to help them evaluate the financial condition of the City. The final step in the formal process of preparing these statements is to present them to the City Council for its acceptance.
The ACFR report is composed of the following parts:
• Introductory Section, including the letter of transmittal • Financial Section
a. Independent Auditors’ Report
b. Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A)
c. Basic City-wide and fund level financial statements
d. Explanatory notes to financial statements, supplemental schedules e. Supplementary information
• Statistical Section
The transmittal letter provides management’s representation of the City’s finances and describes all component units, funds, and activities of the City. The letter also provides a discussion on the City’s budget process, as well as factors affecting the City’s financial conditions, including State budget and local economy, long-term financial planning, risk management, and employee benefit cost.
The Financial Section includes the MD&A that summarizes the financial results for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022, and provides an overview of the financial highlights and a discussion of significant financial changes from the prior year.
DISCUSSION
The 2022 ACFR report delivers positive news highlighted in the MD&A section of the document.
The overall Citywide net assets exceed its liabilities on June 30, 2022, by $84.4 million, an $11 million increase from the prior year, primarily due to increase in citywide revenue base, including one-time funds from American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) and Vehicle License Fees backfill, as further described below.
At the same time, the unrestricted net position improved from negative $40.4 million in the prior year to negative $34.3 million in current fiscal year. The negative net position exists when liabilities exceed assets. As further described in the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, the City’s negative net position figure is a direct result of the City’s recognition of net pension and OPEB liability as required by GASB 68 and 75, respectively, but these obligations do not represent a liability due and payable immediately. The City’s actuarially determined long-term net pension liability was $35.3 million, based on the most recent actuarial valuation and CalPERS Actuarial assumptions and is amortized over a combination of 30 and 20 year schedules. The City’s actuarially determined long-term net OPEB liability increased by $0.6 million from $8.4 to $9.0. In recent years the Council approved prefunding of these obligations through the irrevocable trust with the Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) to help reduce this liability over time, and the City will start seeing positive impacts of this decision to be 5 Packet Pg. 257
Pacifica City Council 3
January 23, 2023
reflected in the next ACFR report. It is important to note that the CalPERS Board has adopted a new amortization policy that will go into effect with the next actuarial valuation that will increase the City’s contribution rates and affect the FY 2022-23 ACFR report.
Altogether, the City’s long-term net pension liability of $35.3 million and Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) obligations of $9.0 million in the FY 2021-22 Statement of Net Position result in the City’s negative unrestricted net position of $34.3 million, which somewhat may limit the City’s future ability to meet ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors and will need to be monitored closely and addressed with the annual review of a funding policy during each budget cycle. It is important to note that these long-term obligations are based on actuarial estimates and do not represent a liability due and payable immediately. Staff will continue evaluating and making recommendations for any necessary adjustments to the City’s funding policy related to these obligations as part of future budget discussions.
Within the above-mentioned unrestricted net assets, $5.0 million is for Business type activities, $4.8 million from Sewer Fund and $0.2 million from Beach Parking Fund.
Total citywide revenues were $71.6 million; this is an increase of $12.1 million (or 20.3%) from the prior year. The increase is primarily due to the one-time $4.6 million in ARPA grant funding, the receipt of $1.8 million of the State’s backfill obligations for the Vehicle License Fees, scheduled $2.9 million increase in sewer rates, restatement of the prior year net fund balance from the Successor Agency fiduciary fund and overall improvement in the City’s revenue base by approximately $1.1 million as a result of COVID recovery. Total City expenses were $61.5 million, an increase of $2.6 million (or 4.4%) over the prior year. The increase is mainly due to depreciation expense in the Sewer Utility Fund.
The Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances presented in the ACFR report is a useful snapshot of the City’s fiscal indicator for the year. Governmental funds include all funds except for proprietary (Sewer) and internal service funds. The Net Change in Fund Balances, reflecting all revenues, expenditures, and transfers, was an increase of $8.25 million from $36.8 million to $45.1 million or by 22.3% in 2021-22, primarily due to the transfers to the General Capital Improvement Fund and the higher than projected allocation of Excess ERAF funds to the Disaster Accounting Special Revenue Fund.
The General Fund is the City’s primary operating fund. It receives unrestricted revenues and provides general administrative services, law enforcement, and animal control services, and land development-related activities such as planning, building, and engineering. The City’s General Fund balance on June 30, 2022, was $16.3 million, which is a decrease of $0.2 million from the prior year. Out of this balance, $3.8 million is non-spendable and relates to RDA obligations, and $0.3 million is restricted for use by outside agencies that cannot be liquidated.
The General Fund Assigned Fund balance of $4.8 million includes budget shortfall reserve of $3.8 million (or 10% of current year general fund operating expenditures), $0.2 million for facilities and maintenance reserve, $0.2 million for Compensated absences, $0.5 million for Child Care reserve, and $0.1 million as a legal reserve per previously approved Council policy.
The remaining unassigned fund balance totaled $7.4 million; which is a $0.6 decrease form from the prior year.
General Fund Revenues of $42.5 million is an increase of $6.8 million or 16% from the prior year of $35.7 million, which is primarily due to the receipt of $4.6 million in ARPA grant funding.
The overall General Fund Expenditures of $38.1 million have increased by $4.1 million or 10.8% over the prior fiscal year primarily due to the increase in benefit costs primarily as a result of implementation of new labor agreements citywide.
5 Packet Pg. 258
Pacifica City Council 4
January 23, 2023
FY2022 FY2021 Variance
Revenues
Taxes 24,284,444 25,107,242 -3.4%
Licenses and permits 1,026,381 1,156,946 -12.7%
Fines and forfeitures 167,612 174,048 -3.8%
Use of money and property 222,511 72,884 67.2%
Intergovernmental 10,875,321 4,736,969 56.4%
Charges for current services 3,649,015 3,267,554 10.5%
Recreational programs 456,080 373,390 18.1%
Other 1,840,182 823,842 55.2%
Total 42,521,546 35,712,875 16.0%
Expenditures
General government 7,242,859 6,093,805 15.9%
Public safety 18,582,989 17,098,183 8.0%
Community development 3,056,701 2,409,540 21.2%
Public works 4,371,543 3,812,296 12.8%
Parks, beaches and recreation 4,785,683 4,390,877 8.2%
Capital outlay 60,620 195,640 -222.7%
Total 38,100,395 34,000,341 10.8%
Net Transfers (3,974,956) (1,128,263) 71.6%
Net Change in Fund Balance 446,195 584,271 -30.9%
Fund balance at beginning of year * 15,846,029 15,917,102 -0.4% Fund Balance at end of year 16,292,224 16,501,373 -1.3% Non-spendable 3,768,557 3,864,704 -2.6%
Restricted 342,510 200,755 0.0%
Assigned 4,803,631 4,441,015 7.5%
Unassigned 7,377,526 7,994,899 -8.4%
Total Fund Balance 16,292,224 16,501,373 -1.3%
* The beginning fund balance for both years were restated.
General Fund Revenues, Expenditures and Fund Balance
Additional information on other operating and capital funds can be found in the attached financial report, MD&A section and notes to the financial statements.
In addition to the ACFR, the auditors prepare other financial reports listed below. These reports include additional financial statements and supplemental data that together with ACFR summarize the results of the operations of all funds and give the comprehensive overview of the City’s financial position for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022:
• Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR)
• Audit Report on Measure A Funds
• Audit Report on Measure W Funds
Maze's report, which appears on page 1 of the City of Pacifica’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, (Attachment 1) is “unmodified” which means that the financial statements 5 Packet Pg. 259
Pacifica City Council 5
January 23, 2023
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the City at June 30, 2022. This is the highest level of auditor assurance that the City can achieve in an audit.
The auditors also prepare the Management Letter to help identify areas that could help improve the City's organization and controls over financial activities. This letter will be prepared and issued by the auditors together with the final ACFR report by the end of January. However, we are pleased to report that the auditors did not note any significant deficiencies or new matters that merit attention for improving internal controls.
Staff will share this year’s Memorandum on the Internal Control and Required Communication with the Council as soon as it is issued by the auditors, but we are pleased to report that there were no new deficiencies identified by the auditors during this audit process.
Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) (Attachment 1) The Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) presents financial information on the status of the City’s financial affairs, first on a city-wide basis (Government-wide Financial Statements) in which all City activities are reported as either governmental activities or business-type activities. The second set of statements (Governmental Funds Financial Statements) report separately the activities of the City’s various funds:
Major Funds
General Fund
Disaster Accounting Fund
General Capital Improvement Fund
Debt Service Fund
Proprietary Funds
Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund
Beach Parking Fund
Internal Service Funds
The lead document in the ACFR is the Transmittal Letter, which includes information regarding the City’s demographics, accounting, and budgetary controls, descriptions of the departments within the City, discussion of the economic impact on the City, and summaries of major initiatives currently active within the City.
The Transmittal letter is followed by the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A). The MD&A is a narrative that provides a brief and easily readable analysis of the City’s fiscal activities for the fiscal year 2021-22. The financial statements and notes to the financial statements are presented next.
Following the financial statements is the statistical section of the report, which includes tables that contain ten years of data that illustrate financial trends and a section with demographic and other data that is useful in analyzing the financial condition and performance of the City.
The comprehensive format of the annual financial report is designed to provide detailed information for all activities of the city government in one document. Rather than reviewing cover to cover, it is suggested that readers initially concentrate on the summary schedules in the MD&A before moving to the full statements, budget comparison statements, and the combined statements that are presented in the financial section of the report.
Audit Report on Measure A Funds (Attachment 2)
The agreement for distribution of San Mateo County Measure A funds for local transportation purposes between the City and San Mateo County Transportation Authority requires the City to 5 Packet Pg. 260
Pacifica City Council 6
January 23, 2023
submit a compliance audit report on the funds received. The audit report found that the City has complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned requirements for the year ended June 30, 2022.
Audit Report on Measure W Funds (Attachment 3)
The agreement between the City and San Mateo County Transportation Authority for distribution of San Mateo County Measure W funds for local transportation purposes in accordance with the San Mateo County Congestion Relief Plan requires the City to submit a compliance audit report on the funds received. The audit report found that the City has complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned requirements for the year ended June 30, 2022.
Single Audit on Federal Awards
The Federal Government requires that any local agency receiving or expending $750,000 or more in combined federal grants, either directly or indirectly in a fiscal year, is subject to a separate audit on those programs, and a separate Single Audit report is issued. The City met this threshold in the fiscal year 2021-2022 and will present this report at a later time.
Staff would like to take an opportunity to acknowledge the hard work of the Finance Department staff in bringing this report forward earlier than the prior years. We also appreciate the competence and diligence displayed by the auditors’ team in assisting the City staff with the preparation and timely completion of this ACFR document. Finally, we would like to express our appreciation to the entire City Council for their attention and unfailing support of maintaining the highest standards of professionalism in managing the City’s finances with the emphasis on transparency, ethics, and fiscal responsibility.
RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:
The City's annual audit is a critical check on the City’s financial practices, which underpin its ability to fund all of the Council Goals.
ALTERNATIVES:
There is no reasonable alternative to the staff recommendation as not accepting the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report will not change the City’s audited financial position as of June 30, 2022.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the Council’s acceptance of the ACFR report. The attached reports present the result of the City's financial operations for the last fiscal year 2021-
22. ORIGINATED BY:
City Manager's Office
ATTACHMENT LIST:
Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 (PDF)
Attachment 2 - Pacifica Measure A FY22 FINAL (PDF)
Attachment 3 - Pacifica Measure W FY22 FINAL (PDF)
5 Packet Pg. 261
ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
CITY OF PACIFICA, CALIFORNIA
5.a
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5.a
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
CALIFORNIA
ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT
Fiscal year ended June 30, 2022
Prepared by
Finance Department
5.a
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5.a
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
INTRODUCTORY SECTION
5.a
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5.a
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Table of Contents
Page
INTRODUCTORY SECTION:
Letter of Transmittal ....................................................................................................................... i Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting ................................................ vii City Council Organizational Chart ............................................................................................... viii City Executive Staff ...................................................................................................................... ix FINANCIAL SECTION:
Independent Auditors’ Report ................................................................................................... 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis .................................................................................. 7 Basic Financial Statements:
Government-wide Financial Statements:
Statement of Net Position ............................................................................................ 23 Statement of Activities ................................................................................................. 24 Fund Financial Statements:
Governmental Funds:
Balance Sheet .......................................................................................................... 26 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds-Balance Sheet with the Statement of Net Position ..................................................................................... 28 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance .................... 30 Reconciliation of the Net Change in Fund Balances –
Total Governmental Funds with the Statement of Activities ................................ 32 Proprietary Funds:
Statement of Net Position ......................................................................................... 33 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position ................... 34 Statement of Cash Flows .......................................................................................... 36 Fiduciary Funds:
Statement of Fiduciary Net Position ......................................................................... 38 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position ...................................................... 39
5.a
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Table of Contents
Page
FINANCIAL SECTION (Continued):
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements ........................................................................... 41 Required Supplementary Information:
Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios – Miscellaneous ......... 90 Schedule of Contributions - Miscellaneous ........................................................................ 92 Schedule of Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios As of the Measurement Date – Safety Plan .................................................................... 93 Schedule of Contributions – Safety Plan ........................................................................... 94 Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios – PARS ...................... 96 Schedule of Contributions – PARS ................................................................................... 98 Schedule of Changes in the Total OPEB Liability and Related Ratios .............................. 99 Budgetary Comparison Schedule:
General Fund ............................................................................................................. 100 Disaster Accounting Special Revenue Fund .............................................................. 102 Notes to Required Supplementary Information ................................................................ 103 Supplementary Information:
Budgetary Comparison Schedule:
Debt Service Fund ..................................................................................................... 106 General Capital Improvement – Capital Projects Fund .............................................. 107 Non-major Governmental Funds:
Combining Balance Sheet ......................................................................................... 112 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances ....................................................................................................... 116 Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual...................................................................... 120 Internal Service Funds:
Combining Statement of Net Position ........................................................................ 126 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position .. 127 Combining Statement of Cash Flows ......................................................................... 128
5.a
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Table of Contents
Page
Statistical Section:
Financial Trends:
Net Position by Component ............................................................................................. 134 Changes in Net Position .................................................................................................. 136 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds .......................................................................... 138 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds ....................................................... 140 Revenue Capacity:
Taxable Sales by Category .............................................................................................. 142 Direct and Overlapping Sales Tax Rate ........................................................................... 143 Tax Revenues by Source ................................................................................................ 144 Assessed Valuation, Tax Rate, and Tax Levies .............................................................. 145 Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates .................................................................... 146 Principal Property Taxpayers ........................................................................................... 147 Property Tax Levies and Collections................................................................................ 148 Debt Capacity:
Outstanding Debt by Type – Governmental ..................................................................... 149 Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type – Business-Type .................................................... 150 Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt ..................................................... 151 Legal Debt Margin Information ......................................................................................... 152 Wastewater Obligations Pledged Revenue Coverage ..................................................... 153 Demographic and Economic Information:
Demographic and Economic Statistics. ........................................................................... 154 Principal Employers ......................................................................................................... 155 Operating Information:
Full Time Equivalent Employees by Function/Program. .................................................. 156 Operating Indicators by Function/Program. ..................................................................... 157 Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program. ................................................................. 158 Sewer Rates .................................................................................................................... 159
5.a
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5.a
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) 1 On October 19, 2021 the Governmental Accounting Standards Board issued a pronouncement (Statement No. 98) that changed the name of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) to Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR). The name change was prompted by concerns that the prior acronym sounds like a profoundly offensive term. No other changes were made to the report’s structure or content.
January 18, 2023
Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council, and Citizens of the City of Pacifica, California:
We are pleased to submit the City of Pacifica's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR)1 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. The purpose of this report is to provide the City Council, City Staff, residents of Pacifica, and other interested parties with accurate, complete, and fair data and helpful information concerning the City's operations and financial position.
The report is prepared in compliance with California Government sections 25250 and 25253 and following the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) set by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board and standards prescribed by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) and audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards by an independent firm of certified public accountants. Pursuant to that requirement, we hereby issue the annual comprehensive financial report of the City for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. This report conforms to GASB Statement 34 financial reporting standards, including dual-perspective financials showing both an entity-wide view of all governmental and business-type activities and a detailed focus on the financial position and operating results of the City's major funds.
We believe the report contains all disclosures necessary for the reader to understand the City's financial affairs. State law requires every general-purpose government to publish a complete set of audited financial statements. Professional standards encourage this report to be published within sufficient time to allow the government to remedy any deficiencies while minimizing negative impacts. This report is issued to fulfill that requirement for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022.
Management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of the information contained in the ACFR based upon a comprehensive framework of internal control that it has established for this purpose.
Stewardship and Internal Control
This report consists of management's representations concerning the finances of the City of Pacifica and promotes accountability. Consequently, responsibility for both the accuracy of the data and the fairness of this presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the City management.
CITY OF PACIFICA
540 Crespi Drive • Pacifica, California 94044-2506
www.cityofpacifica.org
MAYOR
Tygarjas Bigstyck
MAYOR PRO TEM
Sue Vaterlaus
COUNCIL
Mary Bier
Sue Beckmeyer
Scenic Pacifica Christine Boles
Incorporated November
22, 1957
i
5.a
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) To provide a reasonable basis for making these representations, management has established a comprehensive framework of internal control designed to protect the government's assets from loss, theft, or misuse and to compile sufficient reliable information for the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP to:
x Safeguard City assets from loss or unauthorized use or disposal. x Provide reliable financial records for preparing internal and external financial reports and for maintaining accountability over City Assets.
x Ensure compliance with applicable Federal and State laws and regulations related to programs for which the City receives assistance.
As the cost of internal control should not exceed anticipated benefits, the objective is to provide reasonable rather than an absolute assurance that the financial statements are free of any material misstatements.
Management believes that the City's internal controls reasonably safeguard assets, assure that financial transactions are properly recorded and reported, and ensure compliance with applicable Federal and State laws and regulations. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed data is accurate in all material respects and is reported in a manner designed to represent fairly the financial position and results of operation of the City's various funds. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an understanding of the City's financial activities have been included.
State statutes require an annual audit by independent certified public accountants. The purpose of the audit is to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, and/or give a true and fair view in accordance with the financial reporting framework. The City's independent audit involves examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. The City's independent auditor, Maze & Associates, a firm of licensed, certified public accountants, has issued an unmodified ("clean") opinion on the City of Pacifica's financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. The independent auditor's report is located at the front of the financial section of this report.
In addition to meeting the requirements set forth by State law, the audit is also designed to meet the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984 and 2 CFR part 200, subpart F. The standards governing Single Audit engagements require the auditor to report on the City's internal controls and compliance with certain legal requirements with special emphasis on the administration of federal awards. These reports are available in the City's separately issued Single Audit Report.
The ACFR report is presented in three sections:
x The Introduction section includes this letter of transmittal, the City's organizational chart, and certificates of achievement.
x The Financial Section includes the report of the independent auditors; Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A); the basic financial statements, including governmentwide financial statements; and the accompanying notes. Required supplementary information other than the MD&A is also included in the financial section. x The Statistical section includes selected financial and demographic information presented on a multi-year basis.
The notes to the financial statements are provided in the financial section and are considered essential to fair presentation and adequate disclosure. The notes include the summary of significant accounting policies for the City and other necessary disclosure of important matters relating to the City's financial position. The notes are an integral part of the financial statements and should be read in conjunction with them.
ii
5.a
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) GAAP and the Governmental Accounting Standards Board require that management provide a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis to accompany the basic financial statements in the form of Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A). This letter of transmittal is designed to complement the MD&A and should be read in conjunction with it. The City's MD&A can be found immediately following the report of the independent auditors.
City of Pacifica Profile
The City of Pacifica is a full-service city located on the Pacific Coast in San Mateo County, south of San Francisco. Situated within the Bay Area Peninsula, it is framed by the ridges of the Coast Range on the east, the Montara Mountains on the south, and the Pacific Ocean on the west. The City of Pacifica encompasses roughly 12.6 square miles (of which approximately one-half is publicly owned and protected open space) and serves a population of approximately 39,000. A combination of residential, office, and commercial retail businesses, and natural open space, comprise the makeup of the City. The City of Pacifica, while located in the midst of a major metropolitan region, is a unique family-oriented coastal community that prides itself on fostering a "small town" feel. The City's geographic setting, its proximity to San Francisco and the San Francisco International Airport, along with its natural open space and coastal beauty, make it a desirable place to live and work.
The City of Pacifica is a General Law City incorporated in 1957 and operates under the CouncilManager form of government. Legislative authority is vested in a five-member City Council elected by district for four-year overlapping terms. The Mayor is selected each year by a majority vote of the Council members. The City Council is responsible for, among other things, passing ordinances, adopting the budget, appointing advisory commissions/committees, and hiring both the City Manager and City Attorney, who are retained on a contract basis. The City Manager, in turn, appoints the heads of the various departments.
The City provides a range of services to its residents, including but not limited to public safety (police and fire), streets, wastewater and stormwater infrastructure, garbage and recycling, parks, beaches, and recreation, social services, planning and zoning, and leadership through general administrative services. Water, gas, and electric utilities are provided directly through other agencies not under City operations.
The City performed certain infrastructure construction and economic development activities through a separate Redevelopment Agency until its dissolution on February 1, 2012. The City accepted the role of Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency per Council action on January 23, 2012.
Budget Process
The City maintains budgetary controls, the objective of which is to ensure compliance with legal provisions embodied in the annual appropriated budget approved by the City's governing body.
Activities of the general fund, special revenue funds, enterprise funds, debt service funds, and internal service funds are included in the annual appropriated budget. The Capital Improvement Projects budget reflects existing projects that do not lapse at year-end but are carried forward until completion of the project.
The City's budget process goals are to identify necessary and/or desirable service-level options, which are all combined to reach a balanced and sustainable budget. Each City department is provided with a base budget with certain inflationary increases and is given an opportunity to request additional funding if needed. The City Manager, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director, and Deputy Finance Director meet with each department individually to discuss and finalize the proposed budget recommendations. The City Manager then presents the proposed budget to the Council for review prior to the end of May every year. The Council holds a public iii
5.a
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) hearing on the proposed budget and is required to adopt a final budget by no later than the end of June, the close of the City's fiscal year.
The level of budgetary control (that is, the level at which expenditures cannot legally exceed the appropriated amount) is maintained at the department level by tracking expenditures and budget authority. Unexpended budget appropriations lapse at the end of the fiscal year with the exception of capital improvement projects. The City Manager is responsible for the preparation of the budget, and along with the Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director, is responsible for monitoring the budget for legal compliance.
The annual budget serves as the foundation for the City of Pacifica's financial planning and control.
The budget is prepared by fund, and by department (e.g., Police, Fire, Planning, Parks, Beaches and Recreation, Public Works, Administration). The City Manager may transfer resources within a department as he sees fit. Transfers of appropriations between funds need special approval from the Council. City Council may amend the budget by resolution during the fiscal year. The Fiscal Year ("FY") 2021-22 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments were adopted by Council via Resolution No. 15-2022 on March 14, 2022. Budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with GAAP. Budget-toactual comparisons are presented in the supplementary section of the accompanying financial statements for each governmental fund for which an appropriated annual budget has been adopted.
Economic Factors and Financial Outlook
State Budget and Economic Outlook
The City's local economy is a reflection of the regional and state economic outlook. The California economy is poised to overtake Germany as the world's 4th largest economy, continuing to outperform the nation and other countries in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth, companies' market value, and renewable energy.
California has also been the largest state economy by GDP in the past 50 years and has been leading the nation in the current economic recovery. This is due in part to the State's support from the technology and science sectors that were minimally impacted by the pandemic, as well as growth in the defense sector as the Russia-Ukraine conflict continues.
As knowledge workers throughout the State remained employed and sought additional work-from home space during the pandemic, the price of housing continued to climb throughout the State, particularly in the Bay Area, Los Angeles, and San Diego markets.
In May 2022, the Governor of California announced an unprecedented $97.5 billion budget surplus fueled by income tax revenue increases from the strong economic recovery and the extraordinary past year of stock market performance enjoyed by the most affluent residents. Approximately half of the State's income tax is collected from the top 1 percent of the State's income earners. Nearly 10 percent of that income is earned through capital gains in California. However, with the recent economic downturn, the State Budget projects a significant deficit in the upcoming years, which may impact the City’s budget in future years as well.
Local Economy
Overall, the San Francisco Bay Area economy has recovered from the pandemic, enjoying prosperity exceeding pre-pandemic figures in the technology and life science sectors. However, the majority of other sectors – including retail, food, hotel, transportation, arts/entertainment, nonprofit, personal services, and warehousing – remained depressed over the past year. Although the area's economic recovery appears to be encouraging, many challenges resulting from the unprecedented increase in inflation may lie ahead.
According to the June 2022 report from the California Employment Development Department (EDD), California unemployment rate dropped to 4% in June, 2022, from 8.5% in June, 2021, as the state’s employers gained 75,000 payroll jobs. California has now regained 2.6 million jobs (93.6%) lost during March-April of 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. iv
5.a
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) As of June 2022, there were an estimated 448,700 jobs in San Mateo County, an increase of 31,000 jobs from August 2021. The unemployment rate in San Mateo County has decreased from
4.6% in August 2021 to 2.1% in June 2022.
As of the date of this letter, the unemployment rates have stayed level and the next year should be stable. However, if the Federal Reserve bank continues to raise the Fed Rate to slow inflation, a recession is likely to begin in the upcoming years.
Similar to the State level economics, the local economy has experienced job growth and an overall improvement in economically sensitive revenue sources such as transient occupancy tax, on-theground retail sales tax and online sales. In addition, the City's largest revenue source, property tax, has also been positively impacted by rising prices, but will be relatively flat for the next few years given the slow down in home sales and the slight decline in values as a result of the increase in mortgage interest rates
The National Association of Realtors has reported existing-home sales fell for the tenth month in a row in November 2022, or 35.4% from the previous year. The national median existing-home price rose to $370,700, which reflects an increase of 26% from the average price of $295,300 in June 2020, and 3% of the 26% occurred in the last year. According to Real Estate Report for San Mateo County, the median home price of a single-family home in Pacifica is $1,362,500 as of December 2022, as compared to $1,361,500 in June 2021 and $1,200,000 in June 2020, reflecting an increase of 13.5% from 2020 to 2021 and 0.1% from 2021 to 2022. During a declining housing price market, the assessed value usually does not decline but stays flat for the years of decline, therefore the City of Pacifica’s property tax revenue will not decline but may be flat during this next real estate slow down.
Revenues for the City were hit hard by the pandemic but have mostly recovered. The revenue recovery is good news for the City, however, the City is challenged due to inflationary costs outpacing revenue increases.
Residential development in the City has reached near build-out conditions, but commercial development potential exists on sites that remain undeveloped or underdeveloped. There is also residential and commercial redevelopment potential on in-fill and/or underutilized sites. The City and the Pacifica Economic Development Committee are active in encouraging business activity and bringing new resident and visitor-serving businesses to Pacifica.
Fund Balance and Long-Term Financial Planning
The long-term financial plan of the City includes cost containment strategies and a comprehensive cost recovery program, both designed to ensure the long-term financial health of the City. The City of Pacifica has continued to be fiscally conservative in financial investments, as well as with the development of a Long-Term Financial Plan. The current Long-Term Financial Plan was presented to the City Council on April 11, 2022. The City remains vigilant in its efforts to continue to provide essential City services while maintaining sufficient levels of fiscal control and accountability. The City's long-term financial outlook projected a $2.7 million structural deficit in FY 2023-24. With the passage of Measure Y in the November 2022 election, the City is in a much better position to deal with the upcoming challenges.
The City's total Fund Balance in the General Fund is $16.3 million. The Fund Balance is comprised of three components; a Non-spendable portion of $3.8 million; a Restricted for Pensions portion of $0.3 million; an Assigned for Budget Shortfall and other Contingencies portion of $4.8 million; leaving an Unassigned portion (available for spending at the City's policy discretion) of $7.4 million.
The Unassigned portion of the General Fund totals 19.4% of total general fund expenditures and is in addition to the minimum policy guideline of 10 percent of total general fund operating expenditures set by the Council for budgetary shortfall policy and planning purposes. v
5.a
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) Acknowledgments
Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (“GFOA”) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City for its Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (“Annual Report”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021. This was the first year that the City has achieved this prestigious award in recent history. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, the City must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized Annual Report. The report satisfied both GAAP and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current Annual Report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program’s requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate.
Our goal is to publish financial information that is helpful to policy leaders and the public.
Preparation of the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report was made possible by the dedicated service of the entire staff of the City of Pacifica Finance Division. Every member of each department has our sincere appreciation for the contributions made in furthering the fiscal yearend audit and for their continuing effort to improve the quality of this report. We would like to take an opportunity to acknowledge the extraordinary efforts and hard work of Lucy Xie, Deputy Finance Director, Mario Xuereb, Financial Analyst and Matt Pressey, Financial Advisor (RGS) for their assistance with the year-end closure and preparation for the audit, as well as commitment to continue improving the City's financial management and reporting.
We also commend the audit team from Maze and Associates for their professional work, dedication, competence, and diligence in ongoing assistance during the audit process and throughout the year. Finally, we would like to express our appreciation to the City Council for their attention and unfailing support of maintaining the highest standards of professionalism in managing the City's finances in a responsible and conservative manner in the best interests of the citizens of Pacifica with the emphasis on transparency, ethics, and fiscal responsibility.
Respectfully submitted,
Kevin Woodhouse Yulia Carter
City Manager Assistant City Manager
vi
5.a
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) Government Finance Officers Association
Certificate of
Achievement
for Excellence
in Financial
Reporting
Presented to
City of Pacifica
California
For its Annual Comprehensive
Financial Report
For the Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2021
Executive Director/CEO
vii
5.a
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) CiƟzens of Pacifica
City Council
Planning
Commission
Open Space and
Parkland Advisory
CommiƩee
Economic
Development
CommiƩee
BeauƟficaƟon
Advisory
CommiƩee
Library Advisory
CommiƩee
Emergency
Preparedness &
Safety Commission
Parks, Beaches &
RecreaƟon
Commission
City Manager City AƩorney
Parks, Beaches &
Recreation
Director
Assistant City
Manager/Admin.
Services Director
Police Chief
Planning
City Clerk Director
Director of
Public Works
Fire Chief
(North County Fire
Authority)
viii
5.a
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
MARY BIER
Mayor
TYGARJAS BIGSTYCK
Mayor Pro Tem
MIKE O'NEILL
SUE VATERLAUS
SUE BECKMEYER
Members of City Council
* * * * *
KEVIN WOODHOUSE
City Manager
* * * * *
MICHELLE MARCHETTA KENYON
City Attorney
* * * * *
OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS
YULIA CARTER Assistant City Manager/Administrative
Services Director
CHRISTIAN MURDOCK Planning Director
RON MYERS Fire Chief
DAN STEIDLE Police Chief
MICHAEL PEREZ Director of Parks, Beaches &
Recreation
LISA PETERSEN Director of Public Works
SARAH COFFEY City Clerk
* * * * *
OFFICIAL COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS & SAFETY COMMISSION
LIBRARY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
OPEN SPACE AND PARKLAND ADVISORY COMMITTEE
PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION COMMISSION
PLANNING COMMISSION
ix
5.a
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5.a
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
FINANCIAL SECTION
5.a
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5.a
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
To the Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Pacifica, California
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinions
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of governmental activities, businesstype activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Pacifica, California (City), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2022, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements as listed in the Table of Contents.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of June 30, 2022, and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinions
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirement relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.
Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City’s ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter. 1 5.a
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements.
In performing an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, we:
• Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements.
• Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control-related matters that we identified during the audit. 2 5.a
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the Management’s Discussion and Analysis and other required supplementary information as listed in the Table of Contents be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.
Supplementary Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements. The accompanying Supplementary Information, as listed in the Table of Contents, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the Supplementary Information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.
Other Information
Management is responsible for the other information included in the annual report. The other information comprises the Introductory Section and Statistical Section listed in the Table of Contents, but does not include the basic financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon.
Our opinions on the basic financial statements do not cover the other information, and we do not express an opinion or any form of assurance thereon.
In connection with our audit of the basic financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and consider whether a material inconsistency exists between the other information and the basic financial statements, or the other information otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work performed, we conclude that an uncorrected material misstatement of the other information exists, we are required to describe it in our report. 3 5.a
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated December 28, 2022, on our consideration of the City’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements , and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance.
Pleasant Hill, California
December 28, 2022
4 5.a
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS
5.a
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5.a
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) City of Pacifica
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Continued
For the year ended June 30, 2022
The City of Pacifica (City) management staff offers readers of the City’s financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of City financial activities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. It has been designed in accordance with standards established by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. We encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction with the accompanying letter of transmittal and financial statements.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS:
CITY-WIDE:
• The City's total net position was $84.4 million as of June 30, 2022, an increase of $11 million from FY2021. Governmental activities increased $7.5 million and Business-type activities increased $3.5 million. Of this net position of $84.4 million, $53.3 million was in Governmental Activities, and $31.1 million was in Business-type Activities. The City’s net investment in capital assets of $95.6 million is not available for future appropriation (see Table 1 for additional information). The negative unrestricted net position of $34.3 million is mainly the result of implementing GASB Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions recognizing the City’s net pension liability since the fiscal year 2014-15.
• Total City revenues increased by $12.1 million to $71.6 million from $59.5 million. The $9.2 million increase was derived from Governmental Activities, and the $2.9 million increase was derived from Business-type Activities (see Table 2 for additional information). • Total City expenses were $61.5 million: $44.6 million for the Governmental Activities and $16.9 million for the Business-type Activities. This is an increase of $2.6 million compared to the prior year of $58.9 million. Governmental Activities saw a decrease of $0.7 million, while Businesstype Activities saw an increase of $3.3 million mainly due to depreciation. (see Table 2 for additional information).
• The City’s net pension liability and deferred inflows of resources related to pension decreased $2.2 million from a total of $65 million to $62.8 million due to adjustments in the most recent actuarial reports prepared by CalPERS. See Note 7 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details.
FUND LEVEL:
• The City’s governmental funds reported combined fund balances of $45.1 million, an increase of $8.3 million compared to the prior year of $36.8 million. The Enterprise Funds’ net position increased by $3.5 million to $31.1 million from prior year of $27.6 million, and the Internal Service Funds' net position decreased by $1.0 million to $3.7 million from prior year of $4.7 million. .
• During FY2021-22, the City performed a revenue accrual and fund balance reconciliation. As a result, the beginning general fund balance, the housing successor special revenue fund, and the beginning net position of the sewer utility enterprise fund, and the successor agency private trust fund were restated by ($655,644), $362,317, $1,095,458 and ($803,744) respectively. This resulted in net change in fund balances of ($293,027) for governmental activities and $1,095,458 for business type activities respectively. Please see Note 11C of the Notes to Financial Statements for details.
7 5.a
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) City of Pacifica
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Continued
For the year ended June 30, 2022
• The General Fund's assets exceeded its liabilities resulting in an ending fund balance of $16.3 million, a decrease of $0.2 million from the prior year. Of the ending fund balance, $3.8 million is non-spendable, $0.3 million restricted, and $4.8 million has been assigned and intended to be used for specific purposes. The unassigned portion of the fund balance of $7.4 million is available and may be used to meet the government’s ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. • The total assets of the Business-type activities – Enterprise Funds (Sewer and Beach Parking Funds) of the City exceeded its total liabilities at the close of the most recent fiscal year by $31.1 million, an increase of $3.5 million primarily due to the prior year adjustment of revenue accrual of $1.1 million and an approved increase in sewer service charges of $2.4 million. • The net position of internal service fund was $3.7 million, a decrease of $1.0 million from a balance of $4.7 million in the prior fiscal year. Total operating expenses exceeded total operating revenues due to increases in insurance premiums and personnel cost.
OVERVIEW OF THE ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT
This comprehensive annual financial report comprises of six parts to help the readers develop a complete understanding of the City’s financial activities:
1) Introductory section which includes the Transmittal Letter, city council organization chart and city executive staff;
2) Management’s Discussion and Analysis (this part);
3) Basic Financial Statements;
4) Required Supplementary Information;
5) Other supplementary Information;
6) Statistical Information.
The Basic Financial Statements consist of three components: 1) Government-wide financial statements; 2) Fund financial statements; and 3) Notes to the basic financial statements.
The Government-Wide Financial Statements – These statements include the Statement of Net Position and Statement of Activities. These statements provide a broad overview of the City’s finances, presented in a manner similar to private-sector companies.
The Statement of Net Position presents complete information on the City’s assets and deferred outflows of resources and liabilities and deferred inflows of resources, with the difference reported as net position.
Changes in the net position that occur over time may serve as an indicator of the City’s financial position, whether it is improving or deteriorating.
The Statement of Activities presents information showing how the City’s net position changed during the current fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported using the “accrual basis of accounting.” Changes are reported when the underlying event giving rise to the changes occurs, regardless of the timing of the related cash flows. Thus, revenue and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will result in cash flows in future fiscal periods, such as revenues related to uncollected taxes or earned but unused vacation leave.
The government-wide financial statements distinguish functions of the City that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenue (governmental activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges (business-type activities). The City's governmental activities consist of general government, public safety, public works, parks, beaches and 8 5.a
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) City of Pacifica
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Continued
For the year ended June 30, 2022
recreation, and community development. The business-type activities of the City include sewer utility and beach parking.
The government-wide financial statements can be found on pages 25-27.
The Fund Financial Statements – A fund is a grouping of related accounts that are used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal and accounting requirements. The City’s funds can be divided into three categories: governmental, proprietary and fiduciary.
Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. Unlike the government-wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating the City’s near-term financing requirements.
Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government-wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the City’s near-term financing decisions. Both the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet and the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental activities and governmental funds.
The City has four major governmental funds: General, Disaster Accounting, General Capital Improvement, and Debt Service Fund. Information is presented separately in the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet and the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances for these funds. Financial information for the remaining governmental funds is combined into a single, aggregated presentation called Other Governmental Funds. Individual fund data for each of these non-major governmental funds is provided by combining statements located elsewhere in the report.
The governmental fund financial statements can be found on pages 28-34 of this report.
Proprietary funds are used to account for services and activities for which a fee is charged to customers in exchange for City provided goods or services. Proprietary funds use the “economic resources” measurement focus, which concentrates on how transactions and events have affected the fund’s total economic resources.
The City maintains two different types of proprietary funds.
Enterprise Funds: These are funds that are used to report business-type activities in the governmental-wide financial statements. The City has two enterprise funds: Sewer and Beach Parking.
Internal Service Funds: These funds are used to allocate costs internally among the City’s functions. The City uses internal service funds to account for the maintenance and replacement of its fleet and rolling stock, general liability, worker’s compensation, and dental. These funds are included in the governmental activities of the government-wide financial statements because their activities support governmental programs. The internal service funds are then combined into a single, aggregated presentation in the proprietary fund financial statements. Individual data for the internal services funds is provided in the form of combining statements.
The proprietary fund financial statements can be found on pages 35-39 of this report. 9 5.a
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) City of Pacifica
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Continued
For the year ended June 30, 2022
Fiduciary funds are used to account for financial resources held for the benefit of parties outside the City government. The City holds these funds in a custodial capacity or as an agent for individuals, private organizations, or other governmental units. Fiduciary funds are not reflected in the government-wide financial statements because the resources of these funds are not available to support the City’s governmental activities.
The Successor Agency to the City of Pacifica Redevelopment Agency Trust Fund was created as a result of the California Supreme Court decision on December 29, 2011, upholding ABx1 26, which eliminated all redevelopment agencies in California and created a process for winding down their operations. Trust funds report an “income statement” referred to as a Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position.
The fiduciary fund financial statement can be found on pages 40-42 of this report.
Notes to the Financial Statements – The notes provide additional detail essential to a complete understanding of the information provided in the government-wide and fund financial statements. The notes to the basic financial statements can be found starting on page 43 of this report.
The next Required Supplementary Information section of the report provides a budgetary comparison for the major governmental funds. Pension related schedules could be found here. Required supplementary information can be found on page 92-103 of this report.
The Other supplementary information section contains the combining and individual fund statements and schedules which provide information for non-major governmental funds and the internal service funds, all of which are presented immediately after the required supplementary information. Other supplementary information can be found on page 92-103 of this report.
Finally, the Statistical information provides readers last 10 fiscal years information such as net position, change in net position, fund balance in governmental funds, assessed values, direct and overlapping property taxes, principal property taxpayers City of Pacifica has, demographic and economic statistics, principal employers, operating indicators, and capital assets by function.
GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Statement of Net Position
Net position may serve over time as a useful indicator of the City’s financial position. As noted earlier in the financial highlights, Pacifica’s total net position was $84.4 million as of June 30, 2022, representing an increase of $11.0 million over the prior year of $73.4 million. This increase resulted from the following: an increase in total assets of $11.8 million, primarily due to a receipt of $4.6 million ARPA funds and $4.0 million new loan proceeds for the Civic Center remodel project; a decrease of deferred outflows of $0.9 million; a decrease of liabilities of $24.1 million and an increase of deferred inflows of $24 million as a result of adjustments provided by CalPERS Actuarial reports. Assets and deferred outflows of resources as of June 30, 2022, were $229.7 million, reflecting a 5.0% increase from the prior year. Total assets increased mainly from the large increase in cash and investment of $20 million offset by a decrease in other assets of $7.6 million. Liabilities and deferred inflows stayed relatively flat at $145.3 million as of FY2022 compared with $145.3 million as of FY2021 (Table 1).
As of June 30, 2022, the City reported positive balances in all categories of net position for the government as a whole except for unrestricted net position. 10 5.a
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) City of Pacifica
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Continued
For the year ended June 30, 2022
The largest portion of the City’s net position is its net investment in capital assets totaling $95.6 million.
Capital assets are the aggregate value of land, buildings, and improvements that are used to provide services and are reported net of any related debt used to acquire those assets that are still outstanding. Consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the City’s investment in capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay these debts must be provided from other sources since the capital assets cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities.
The City’s restricted net assets of $23.0 million represent resources that are subject to external restrictions on how the funds may be used, such as constructing specified capital projects, debt service, or other community programs.
The remaining balance in unrestricted net position of negative $34.3 million is primarily the result of the implementation of GASB Statements No. 68, 71, and 75 pension and other post -employment benefits related liability accruals. It is important to note that these long-term obligations are based on actuarial estimates and do not represent a liability due and payable immediately. Please refer to the Note 7 to basic financial statements for more information about the impact of the implementation of these statements.
FY22 FY21 FY22 FY21 FY22 FY21
Cash and investments 46.0 $ 33.5 $ 11.3 $ 3.9 $ 57.4 $ 37.4 $ Other assets 5.8 9.0 1.0 5.4 6.8 14.4
Capital assets 87.5 88.6 62.6 64.2 151.1 151.7
Total assets 130.0 140.3 73.5 74.9 215.3 203.5
Deferred Outflows of Resources 13.4 14.3 1.0 1.0 14.4 15.3 Current liabilities 5.8 4.0 7.4 3.3 11.4 9.1
Non-current liabilities 88.8 65.2 40.6 43.4 105.8 132.2 Total liabilities 94.6 72.6 44.6 46.7 117.2 141.3
Deferred Inflows of Resources 27.8 0.2 3.8 0.2 28.0 4.0 Net Position
Net investment in capital
assets 71.5 69.5 26.1 25.1 96.6 95.6
Restricted 17.3 23.0 17.3 23.0
Unrestricted (42.9) (39.3) 2.5 5.0 (34.3) (40.4)
Total net position $ 53.3 $ 45.8 $ 31.1 $ 27.6 $ 84.4 $ 73.4 Business-Type
Activities Totals
Table 1
Comparative Statement of Net Position
Activities
Governmental
(In Millions)
11 5.a
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) City of Pacifica
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Continued
For the year ended June 30, 2022
Statement of Activities
The Statement of Activities provides information about all the City’s revenue and expenses, with an emphasis on measuring net revenues or expenses in each of the City’s programs and explains in detail the change in Net Position for the year.
Governmental activities increased the City’s net position by $7.7 million with a total net position of $53.3 million at the end of the fiscal year. Business type activities increased the City’s net position by $2.4 million with a total net position of $31.1 million at the end of the fiscal year. (Table 2) Revenues FY22 FY21 FY22 FY21 FY22 FY21
Program revenues
Charges for service $ 5.3 6.3 $ 19.5 $ 16.6 $ 25.9$ 21.9$ Operating contributions & grants 8.6 3.5 3.5 8.6
Capital grants 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.4
Total program revenues 11.1 19.5 17.3 16.6 36.8 27.7
General revenues
Taxes:
Property 15.1 14.4 15.1 14.4
Sales and use 2.9 3.1 2.9 3.1
Franchise 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.8
Other taxes 10.4 9.0 10.4 9.0
Motor Vehicle In Lieu 2.6 4.4 2.6 4.4
Investment Earnings - 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3
Miscellaneous 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3
Total general revenues 31.5 34.5 0.3 34.8 0.3 31.8
Total revenues 42.6 19.8 51.8 16.9 71.6 59.5
Expenses
Governmental Activities
General government 7.1 7.5 7.1 7.5
Public Safety 21.1 18.6 21.1 18.6
Community Development 3.0 3.2 3.0 3.2
Public Works 7.7 9.3 7.7 9.3
PBR 5.4 4.9 5.4 4.9
Interest on long-term debt 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Business-Type Activities - -
Sewer 12.9 16.3 16.3 12.9
Beach Parking 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6
Total expenses 45.3 16.9 44.6 13.6 61.5 58.9
Change in net position before transfers (2.7) 7.2 2.9 3.3 10.2 0.6 Transfers 0.5 (0.3) (0.5) 0.3 - -
Change in net position (2.9) 7.7 2.4 3.6 10.2 0.6
48.7 28.7 45.5 24.0 74.2 72.7
Net position - ending 53.3 $ 45.8 $ 31.1 $ 27.6 $ 84.4$ 73.4$ Table 2
Statement of Activities
(In Millions)
Governmental
Activities
Net position - beginning, as restated
(Note 11C)
Business-Type
Activities Total
12 5.a
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) City of Pacifica
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Continued
For the year ended June 30, 2022
The City’s total revenues were $71.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2022, an increase of $12.1 million from previous fiscal year. Program revenue for both Governmental and Business-type activities increased by $9.1 million from $27.7 million to $36.8 million. Revenues from all taxes increased by $1.0 million from $28.7 million to $29.7 million. Other revenues lead to an additional increase of $2 million to the total revenue. A large part of program revenue increase is due to ARPA revenue of $4.6 million received, charge for services of $1 million increase from governmental activities as the COVID situation improves and many city programs are back to normal and charge for services of $2.9 million increase from Business-type activities as a result of rate adjustment.
General revenues and transfers from all sources relating to governmental activities increased by $3.7 million or 12.0% to $35.0 million. The increase in general revenues was the result of the state partially fulfilling their obligations for VLF backfill resulting in $1.8 million increase in this category, other taxes of $1.4 million increase and transfer in of $0.8 million increase.
The City’s total program expenses were $61.5 million, an increase of $2.6 million over the prior fiscal year, primarily due to the increase in Business-type activities – sewer operation that includes $3.4 million from annual depreciation expenses. from governmental activities decreased by $0.7 million or
1.6% to $44.6 million for the fiscal year. Other categories stayed about consistent with the prior year. (Table 2)
Governmental Activities Revenues. In FY2022, the City received nearly 57% of its revenue from taxes: 28% from property taxes, 20% from other taxes, 6% from sales taxes, and 3% from franchise taxes. The City also received 12% from charges for services, 17% from operating contribution and grants, 5% from capital grants, and 8% from Motor Vehicle in Lieu.
Governmental Activities Expenses. In FY2022, 81% of expenses were attributable to direct services such as Public Safety, Public Works, Parks Beaches and Recreation, and Community 13 5.a
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) City of Pacifica
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Continued
For the year ended June 30, 2022
Development with percentages of 42%, 21%, 11% and 7% respectively. This was consistent with 82% in the prior year. Total expenditures were $44.6 million in FY2022 which was $0.7 million less than $45.3 million in the prior year.
The majority of these governmental activities are financed from City taxes. However, funds collected in program revenues for these various activities served to offset the departmental spending associated with some services. Governmental expenses, which totaled $44.6 million, were offset in part by program revenues for governmental activities of $17.3 million, an increase from $11.1 million in the prior year. These program revenues included $6.3 million in charges for services, $8.6 million in operating grants and contributions, and $2.4 million in capital grants and contributions and reflect the City’s recovery from the pandemic. Charges for services include traffic safety fines, plan check fees, building inspection fees, other charges related to new construction, and fees charged for parks, beaches, and recreational events. Operating grants and contributions include amounts that can only go toward operations-related expenses, while capital grants and contributions are required to go toward capital investments. (Table 3)
14 5.a
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) City of Pacifica
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Continued
For the year ended June 30, 2022
Business-type Activities
The net position of the City’s business-type activities increased by $2.4 million from a restated beginning net position of $28.7 million. In the fiscal year 2021-22, enterprise operations produced total operating revenues of $19.5 million, a $2.5 million increase from the prior year. The increase in revenue was mostly from the previously approved increase in sewer utility rates. (Table 2) Business-type expenses totaled $16.9 million at the end of the fiscal year. Operating expenses for these activities increased by $3.3 million or 24.1% from the prior year. The increase was attributable to larger depreciation expense. (Table 2)
Unlike the government activities, program revenues cover total expenses in the business-type activities, with no contribution from City taxes. The City is able to adjust sewer and parking rates to cover expenditures and future liabilities.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE CITY’S MAJOR FUNDS
Governmental funds
The focus of the City’s governmental funds is to provide information on near-term inflows, outflows and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the financial requirements and stability of the City. Unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government’s net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year.
In FY2022, the City’s governmental funds reported total fund balances of $45.1 million, an increase of $8.3 million from $36.8 million (restated) from FY2021. The increase is a result of the following factors: a decrease of $0.2 million in General Fund, an increase of $1.6 million in Disaster Accounting Fund, an increase of $3.4 million in General Capital Improvement Fund, an increase of $5.1 million in Debt Service Fund and a decrease of $1.6 million in all other governmental funds. (Table 4) The General Fund, General Capital Improvement Fund, Disaster Accounting Fund, and the Debt Service Fund are considered major funds and are reported separately in the basic Financial Statements.
FY22 FY21 FY22 FY21 FY22 FY21
General government 5.9 $ 0.4 $ 7.48 $ $ 7.1 (1.6)$ $ (6.7) Public Safety 1.9 1.8 21.1 18.6 (16.8) (19.2)
Community development 3.2 2.7 3.0 3.2 (0.6) 0.2
Public works 3.5 3.6 7.7 9.3 (5.8) (4.2)
Parks, beaches, and recreation 3.4 2.1 5.4 4.9 (1.6) (3.3) Interest on long-term debt - - 1.0 1.0 (1.0) (1.0)
$ 17.3 $ 11.1 $ 44.6 $ 45.3 $ (27.3) $ (34.2)
Program Revenues Operating Expenses Net Revenue (Expense) Table 3
Governmental Activities
Program Revenues and Net Revenue (Expense) From Services for fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 (In Millions)
15 5.a
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) City of Pacifica
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Continued
For the year ended June 30, 2022
General Fund
The General Fund is the City’s main operating fund. General Fund revenues totaled $42.5 million in the fiscal year 2021-22, a $6.8 million or 19.1% increase from the prior year primarily due to a receipt of one-time American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds. Expenditures totaled $38.1 million, a $4.1 million or 12.1% increase from the prior year. The General Fund received transfers in of $1.1 million from the Street Construction Fund, Gas Tax Fund and NPDES stormwater Fund as reimbursement for salaries and benefits related expenditures. The General Fund also transferred out $5.1 million to General capital improvement fund, debt service fund, general liability insurance Fund for capital projects, debt service and insurance funding, including a one-time $3 million contribution towards the Civic Center improvement project. Detailed notes on the transfers can be found in the Interfund Transactions section - Note 9 in the Notes to the Basic Financial Statements.
The General Fund balance as of June 30, 2022 was $16.3 million, $.5 million more than prior fiscal year of $15.8 million (as restated). The City Council assigned $4.8 million as reserves for specific purposes as described in Note 11 of the Notes to the Basic Financial Statements. A total of $7.4 million of the General Fund balance remains unassigned.
Disaster Accounting Fund
The Disaster Accounting Fund accounts for both revenues and expenditures associated with catastrophic events occurring in the City.
The Disaster Accounting Fund had revenues of $2.1 million, which is a decrease of $0.1 million from the prior year. This revenue is from San Mateo County tax remittance for excess ERAF (Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund). The total expenditures in the Disaster Accounting fund decreased by $0.1 million due to the scheduled reduced allocation for the seawall emergency repairs project. The fund balance improved by $1.6 million to $6.1 million due to higher ERAF revenues allocated to the Disaster Accounting Fund per City policy previously approved by Council.
Fund Balance Fund Balance Net change in
FY22 FY21 Fund Balance
General Fund 16.3 $ 16.5 $ (0.2) $
Disaster Accounting Fund 6.1 4.5 1.6
General Capital Improvement Fund 6.7 3.3 3.4
Debt Service Fund 5.3 0.2 5.1
Other Governmental Funds 10.7 12.3 (1.6)
Total Governmental Funds $ 45.1 $ 36.8 $ 8.3
Table 4
Total Governmental Funds
(In Millions)
16 5.a
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) City of Pacifica
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Continued
For the year ended June 30, 2022
General Capital Improvement Fund
The General Capital Improvement Fund accounts for funds used for capital improvements and significant maintenance projects. The City capitalizes equipment with a cost basis of at least $5,000, and that has an estimated useful life in excess of one year. Structures, improvements, and infrastructure are also capitalized. All capital assets are valued at historical cost. For more information on capital assets, please refer to Note 4 on the Notes to the Basic Financial Statement.
The General Capital Improvement Fund received revenues of $1.9 million, which was an increase of $1.9 million. The increase was due to a one-time allocation of $1.5 million from ERAF fund and an insurance reimbursement of $0.3 million towards the civic center remodel project. A total of $3.8 million was transferred in from other funds to support ongoing investments in infrastructure and construction costs to fund previously approved projects, including transfers from general fund of $3.0 million and Sewer Fund of $0.5 million.
General Capital Improvement Fund expenditures totaled $2.3 million, which is an increase of $1.0 million from the prior year. The entire fund balance of $6.7 million is restricted for the ongoing construction of capital projects. (Table 4)
Debt Service Fund
The Debt Service Fund is used to account for resources used to repay general long-term debt and to record the payment of principal and interest as well as other expenditures related to debt administration. This Fund balance as of June 30, 2022 was $5.3 million (Table 4), an increase of $5.1 million from prior fiscal year of $0.2 million. The main reason of increase of the fund balance is a result of $4.0 million loan for the Civic Center Project and a transfer in from general fund of $1.9 million for the payments of debts, which was an increase of $1.3 million compared with prior fiscal year of $0.6 million transfer in from general fund to account for the scheduled increase in debt payments including 2016 COP bonds and 2019 Pension Obligation Bonds. The detailed description of the City’s outstanding debt and long-term obligations associated with each issue can be found in Note 5 in the Notes to the Basic Financial Statements.
Proprietary Funds
The City’s proprietary fund statements provide the same type of information found in the governmentwide financial statements. The City’s enterprise funds include Sewer facility fund and Beach parking fund, while the internal service funds include Self Insurance Dental, Self Insurance Worker’s Comp, Self Insurance General Liability, Motor Pool Operations, Motor Pool Replacement funds and Fire Equipment Replacement Fund.
Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund
The Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund accounts for the operation and maintenance of the City’s wastewater system, including the operating costs of the wastewater collection system and water recycling plant. The Sewer Utility Fund continues to show healthy fiscal condition as in prior years.
There was an increase of $2.4 million in the fund’s overall net position compared to the prior year (Table 5), but a large portion of the net position (84.0%) is related to the City’s investment in capital assets.
17 5.a
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) City of Pacifica
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Continued
For the year ended June 30, 2022
The fund’s net revenue increased by $2.9 million from the prior year, mostly the result of sewer rate adjustment to meet future needs of the sewer enterprise. Total operating expenses of the Sewer Utility Fund increased by $3.3 million, largely due to an increase in depreciation expense compared with FY2021.Transfer out goes to Debt service fund for the 2019 Pension Bonds Pool share, NPDES fund and General Capital Improvement fund totaled $0.5 million. The result of net operating income and transfer out leads to $2.4 increase to the net position.
Internal Service Funds
The Internal Service Funds represent funds set aside to cover employee dental expenses and insurance deductibles for liability and worker’s compensation. In addition, funds are also set aside to support replacement purchases and the day-to-day operation and maintenance of city vehicles and equipment. The internal service funds as a whole experienced a decrease in net position of $1.0 million from the prior year primarily due to the increased insurance premiums (Table 5).
GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS
Detailed information on budget variances can be found on page 132 in the Budgetary Comparison Schedule General Fund. The adopted fiscal year 2021-22 General Fund budget assumed minimal growth in revenue. Thus ongoing expenditures were also contained within the forecasted revenue in order to maintain a structurally balanced budget.
Total General Fund revenues were $42.5 million, which is $2.8 million more than the original budget.
Total expenditures were $38.1 million, which is $0.9 million under budget.
The most significant differences between estimated and actual results were as follows:
• Property tax was over budget by $0.1 million.
• Other taxes which include transient occupancy, business license, utility users, and cannabis taxes along with sales tax, franchise tax outperform the final budget by $0.5 million.
FY22 FY21 FY22 FY21
Operating revenues 19.5 $ 16.6 $ 2.5$ 2.2$
Operating expenses 15.3 12.0 3.6 3.1
Operating income (loss) 4.2 4.6 (1.1) (0.9)
Non-operating revenues (expenses) (1.3) (1.3) 0.0 0.0
Net income (loss) before
contributions and transfers 2.9 3.3 (1.1) (0.9)
Transfers in (out) (0.5) 0.3 0.1 0.1
Change in net position $ 2.4 $ 3.6 $ (1.0) $ (0.8)
Table 5
Change in Fund Net Position - Proprietary Funds for the year ended June 30, 2022 (In Millions)
Total Enterprise Funds Total Internal Service Funds
18 5.a
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) City of Pacifica
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Continued
For the year ended June 30, 2022
• Charges for current services didn’t materialize as expected. The final budget was a little too optimistic about the reopening and the increased need for program services for residents, the actual revenue performed under budget by $0.4 million.
• General fund total expenditures were under budget by $0.9 million, which was a favorable variance. • Expenditures in general government were over budget by $0.5 million due to legal fees increase for various needs such as projects, litigation and personnel matters. • Expenditures in public safety were over budget by $0.3 million because of salaries, benefits and overtime costs.
• Expenditures in other operating departments such Planning, Public Works, and Parks Beaches and Recreations were under budget by $0.9 million, $0.4 million and $0.3 million respectively primarily due to salary savings resulted from the challenging recruitment market and many positions remaining vacant for the big part of the year.
CAPITAL ASSETS AND LONG-TERM DEBT ADMINISTRATION
Capital Assets
As reported in the Statement of Net Position, capital assets for the governmental and business-type activities totaled $151.2 million on June 30, 2022, decreased by $0.5 million from the prior fiscal year.
The investment in capital assets includes land, construction in progress, buildings, improvements, machinery and equipment, and infrastructure. The City records its capital assets at historical cost or estimated historical cost if actual historical cost is not available. The City depreciates all its capital assets on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The City’s capita assets are summarized in Table 6. Additional information on capital assets may be found in Note 4 in the Notes to the Basic Financial Statements.
The total capital assets slight decrease of $0.5 million is a result of $1.1 million increase in governmental activities and $1.6 million decrease in the business-type activities is mostly due to an adjustment in construction in progress.
FY22 FY21 FY22 FY21 FY22 FY21
Governmental activities
Land 40.5 $ 40.5$ $ 4.0 4.0 $ 44.5 $ 44.5$
Construction in progress 9.1 1.8 3.5 6.5 8.3 12.6
Building and improvements 16.6 16.3 77.6 77.6 94.2 93.9 Machinery and equipment 3.5 3.5 4.2 3.9 7.7 7.4
Collection Systems 44.9 48.8 48.8 44.9
Vehicles 8.4 8.5 8.5 8.4
Infrastructure 52.2 46.3 52.2 46.3
Less accumulated depreciation (39.2) (36.5) (73.8) (69.7) (113.0) (106.2) Totals $ 88.6 87.5$ $ 62.6 $ 151.2$ 151.7$ 64.2
Total
Table 6
Capital Assets at June 30, 2022
(In Millions)
Governmental
Activities
Business Type
Activities
19 5.a
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) City of Pacifica
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Continued
For the year ended June 30, 2022
Long Term Debt
On June 30, 2022, the City had long-term debt obligations of $64.8 million. Governmental Activities had debt outstanding in the amount of approximately $27.1 million, and the business-type activities had approximately $37.7 million. The total reduction of $0.4 million from the prior year was due to regular debt service retirement of $4.5 million and a $4 million Civic center loan originated in FY2022.
Additional information on long-term debt activity may be found in Note 5 of the Notes to the Basic Financial Statements.
ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR’S BUDGET AND RATES
According to the June 2022 report from the California Employment Development Department (EDD), California’s unemployment rate improved and has dropped from 8.5% in June 2021 to 4% in June 2022 as the state’s employers gained 75,000 payroll jobs after regaining all these jobs lost during the March and April 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Like most public agencies, the City of Pacifica is gradually recovering from the abrupt economic impact induced by the pandemics and expects to return to pre-pandemic revenue and service level by the end of FY2023-2024. The current budget is the year of transition as we will focus on restoring and revising city services to adapt to the community needs and prepare for a changing future.
Pacifica’s unemployment is 2.2% in June 2022, compared with 12.9% record high in April 2020 and record low of 1.2% in December 2019.
Below are some key points/assumptions applied to the FY2022-2023 budget (please refer to budget book FY2022-23).
Revenue Projections: Property tax revenues are projected to increase by 4.2% over last year’s midyear adjusted tax revenue amounts as property sales have remained strong despite the pandemic.
A modest 3.3% increase in sales tax is projected for FY 2022-23. Pacifica’s mix of sales tax types combined with an increase in online sales has kept this revenue category modestly resilient during the pandemic. Hotels and Short-term rentals suffered during the pandemic but are projected to bounce back during FY 2022-2023. Other taxes, such as utility users tax, franchise tax, and business license tax, are projected a 2% increase compared to FY 2021-22 mid-year adjusted. One concern in this category is the Vehicle License Fee shortfall of approximately $690K the state owes the City per the San Mateo County Controller’s office, the backfill for which can lag up to two years.
FY22 FY21 FY22 FY21 FY22 FY21
2019 Pension Obligation Refunding Bond 7.8 $ 8.6 $ 1.0 $ 1.1 $ 8.8 $ 9.7 $ 2016 Certificate of Participation 15.2 16.0 15.2 16.0
Capital Lease Payable 4.1 0.2 4.1 0.2
2014 Wastewater Revenue
Refunding Bond 7.4 7.2 7.4 7.2
2017 Wastewater Revenue Bond 25.5 25.4 25.4 25.5
Notes Payable - 4.1 6.4 4.1 6.4 -
Total Debt Outstanding $ 24.8 27.1 $ 37.7 $ 40.4 $ 64.8 $ 65.2 $ Total
Table 7
Outstanding Debt at June 30, 2022
(In Millions)
Governmental
Activities
Business-type
Activities
20 5.a
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) City of Pacifica
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Continued
For the year ended June 30, 2022
For FY 2022-23, the budget is utilizing approximately $4.6 million in one-time American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds to help replenish the revenue losses, balance the budget, and avoid service reductions. Combined ongoing and one-time revenues for the General Fund are projected to be flat from last year’s mid-year adjusted revenues. The General Fund budget for FY2022-2023 is $47.3 million in revenue and $47.3 million in expenditures. It will generate a small structural surplus of $3,000 in the FY2022-2023 General Fund budget.
Expenditures: Salaries and Benefits projections assume a 2% of Cost of Living Adjustment.
Materials, supplies and Maintenance category assumes a very modest 1.5% increase that partially accounts for inflation. Contractual services category assumes a 2.5% increase. The total General Fund expenditures of $47.3 million shows $3.5 million or 8% increase in spending over the revised FY2021-2022 Budget, which includes the General Fund’s one-time contribution towards the capital improvement program of $655,000. The increase in expenditures in the coming year is primarily due to the budget assumptions used to develop the base budget as well as approved budget enhancements, including additional limited-term staffing to meet council’s current and upcoming priorities, which are described in detail in the Executive Summary section of the budget book.
Sewer Rate Adjustments: The most recent rate study for the sewer utility was completed in 2017.
Soon after, the City Council approved an ordinance that enacted a five-year rate structure with a maximum annual rate increase for the City’s wastewater program service charges from fiscal year 2017-18 through 2021-22. The revenues generated by the rate structure are the main source of revenue for the wastewater program and address its future capital and financial needs. The fiscal year 2022-23 rate increase was 3.5%.
Staff will continue monitoring the City’s economic conditions and continue to work with the City Council and community to address any current and potential challenges that may lay ahead. To this end, staff will build or revise the budget assumptions based on any new information as it becomes available. This work may include identifying operational opportunities, assessing appropriate fee structure, pursuing acceptable economic development opportunities, and advising on alternative revenue options available to the City and the community to boost economic recovery and ensure the continuing high quality of life for the residents and visitors of Pacifica.
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
This report is designed to provide citizens, taxpayers, investors, and creditors with a general overview of the City's finances and to show the City’s accountability for the money it receives.
Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional financial information should be directed to:
City of Pacifica
Finance Department
Attn: Yulia Carter, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director 540 Crespi Drive, Pacifica, California 94044.
An electronic version of this financial report is available at the City’s website at http://www.cityofpacifica.org.
21 5.a
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5.a
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
Governmental Business-Type
Activities Activities Total
ASSETS
Cash and investments (Note 3) $38,419,438 $7,310,530 $45,729,968 Cash and investments with fiscal agents (Note 3) 4,600,228 4,030,189 8,630,417 Restricted cash and investments (Note 3) 3,001,260 3,001,260 Taxes receivable 230 230
Accounts receivable, net of allowance 2,560,714 2,560,714 Interest receivable 13,901 13,901
Prepaid items 178,394 379,264 557,658
Inventories 18,715 6,597 25,312
Receivable from successor agency (Note 10) 3,641,599 3,641,599 Internal balances (Note 9) (649,938) 649,938
Capital assets, not being depreciated (Note 4) 46,933,938 5,768,316 52,702,254 Capital assets, being depreciated,
net of accumulated depreciation (Note 4) 41,625,744 56,793,548 98,419,292 Total Assets 140,344,223 74,938,382 215,282,605
DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Deferred charge on refunding of debt 387,025 207,873 594,898 Related to OPEB (Note 6) 1,478,114 31,401 1,509,515
Related to pension (Note 7) 11,537,495 719,521 12,257,016 Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 13,402,634 958,795 14,361,429
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable 3,053,683 1,238,768 4,292,451
Interest payable 320,415 75,519 395,934
Refundable deposits 1,211,759 1,211,759
Unearned revenue 6,500 6,500
Claims payable due within one year (Note 8) 304,204 304,204 Compensated absences (Note 1M):
Due within one year 922,784 185,817 1,108,601
Due in more than one year 696,136 128,252 824,388
Long term debt (Note 5):
Due within one year 1,563,816 2,552,671 4,116,487
Due in more than one year 25,551,930 35,120,013 60,671,943 Net OPEB Liabilities, due in more than one year (Note 6) 7,481,035 1,517,682 8,998,717 Net pension liabilities, due in more than one year (Note 7) 31,514,646 3,788,519 35,303,165 Total Liabilities 72,626,908 44,607,241 117,234,149
DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Related to OPEB (Note 6) 390,910 112,275 503,185
Related to pension (Note 7) 27,441,602 94,801 27,536,403 Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 27,832,512 207,076 28,039,588 NET POSITION (Note 11)
Net investment in capital assets 69,492,549 26,098,298 95,590,847 Restricted for:
PARS Pension Trust 342,510 342,510
Construction of capital assets 7,861,392 7,861,392
Streets, highways, and other related purposes 3,322,713 3,322,713 Parks, beaches and recreation 4,878,774 4,878,774
Stormwater operations 324,165 324,165
Public safety 6,314,177 6,314,177
Unrestricted (39,248,843) 4,984,562 (34,264,281)
Total Net Position $53,287,437 $31,082,860 $84,370,297
See accompanying notes to financial statements
JUNE 30, 2022
23 5.a
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Operating Capital
Charges for Contributions Contributions
Functions/Programs Expenses Services and Grants and Grants Governmental Activities:
General government $7,481,370 $135,929 $5,744,141
Public safety 18,632,393 773,713 1,038,895 $9,541
Community development 3,243,238 2,520,754 150,489
Public works 9,326,203 1,059,275 150,636 2,364,681
Parks, beaches and recreation 4,928,418 1,859,921 1,514,023 Interest on long-term debt 969,550
Total Governmental Activities 44,581,172 6,349,592 8,598,184 2,374,222 Business-type Activities:
Sewer 16,258,603 18,965,244
Beach Parking 620,511 559,195
16,879,114 19,524,439
$61,460,286 $25,874,031 $8,598,184 $2,374,222
Taxes:
Other taxes
Motor vehicle in lieu, unrestricted
Investment earnings
Miscellaneous
Transfers
Total General Revenues and Transfer
Change in Net Position
Net Position at beginning of year, as restated (Note 11C) Net Position at end of year
See accompanying notes to financial statements
Sales and use taxes
Franchise taxes
Total Business-type Activities
Total
Program Revenues
General Revenues:
Property taxes
24 5.a
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) Net
(Expense) Revenue and
Chan
ges in Net Position
Governmental Business-t
ype
Activities Activities Total ($1,601,300) ($1,601,300
)
(16,810,244)(16,810,244)
(571,995)(571,995)
(5,751,611)(5,751,611)
(1,554,474)(1,554,474)
(969,550)(969,550)
(27,259,174)(27,259,174)
$2,706,641 2,706,641 (61,316) (61,316
)
2,645,325 2,645,325
(27,259,174) 2,645,325 (24,613,849)
14,445,541 14,445,541
3,136,433 3,136,433
1,754,500 1,754,500
10,385,735 10,385,735
4,355,327 4,355,327
100,562 286,486 387,048
324,910 324,910
499,600 (499,600)
35,002,608
(213,114) 34,789,494
7,743,434 2,432,211 10,175,645
45,544,003 28,650,649 74,194,652
$53,287,437 $31,082,860 $84,370,297
25 5.a
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 2022
General
Disaster Capital
Accounting Improvement
Special Capital Debt
Revenue Projects Service
General Fund Fund Fund
Assets
Cash and investments (Note 3) $12,629,788 $6,212,043 $7,338,908 $1,021,645 Cash and investments with fiscal agents (Note 3) 342,510 13,415 4,244,303 Restricted cash and investments (Note 3)
Receivables:
Taxes 230
Accounts 2,194,424 57,225 12,500
Interest 13,900 1
Due from other funds 917,260
Prepaid items 126,958 51,436
Receivable from RDA successor agency (Note 10) 3,641,599 Total Assets $19,866,669 $6,269,268 $7,364,824 $5,317,384 Liabilities and Fund Balances
Liabilities:
Accounts payable $1,706,248 $180,854 $641,860
Due to other funds
Refundable deposits 1,211,759
Unearned revenue 6,500
Advance from other funds (Note 9) 649,938
Total Liabilities 3,574,445 180,854 641,860
Fund balances (Note 11):
Non-spendable 3,768,557
Restricted 342,510 6,088,414 6,722,964 $5,317,384
Assigned 4,803,631
Unassigned 7,377,526
Total Fund Balances 16,292,224 6,088,414 6,722,964 5,317,384 Total Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of
Resources and Fund Balances $19,866,669 $6,269,268 $7,364,824 $5,317,384 See accompanying notes to financial statements
26 5.a
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) Other
Governmental
Funds Total
$8,546,067 $35,748,451
4,600,228
3,001,260 3,001,260
230
295,042 2,559,191
13,901
917,260
178,394
3,641,599
$11,842,369$50,660,514
$249,472 $2,778,434
917,260 917,260
1,211,759
6,500
649,938
1,166,732 5,563,891
3,768,557
11,295,423 29,766,695
4,803,631
(619,786) 6,757,740
10,675,637 45,096,623
$11,842,369$50,660,514
27 5.a
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) Reconciliation of the
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS - BALANCE SHEET
with the
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
JUNE 30, 2022
Fund Balance - Governmental Funds $45,096,623
Amounts reported for Governmental Activities in the Statement of Net Position is different from those reported in the governmental funds because of the following:
Capital assets used in Governmental Activities are not current resources and, 86,754,289
387,025
Compensated Absences (1,575,124)
Long term debt (26,981,551)
Interest payable (320,085)
Net OPEB liabilities (7,481,035)
Net Pension Liabilities (31,514,646)
Deferred inflows related to pension and OPEB (27,832,512) Deferred outflows related to pension and OPEB 13,015,609 3,738,844
Net Position of Governmental Activities $53,287,437
See accompanying notes to financial statements
CITY OF PACIFICA
new debt or old debt whichever is shorter in the Statement of Net Position.
Internal service funds are used by management to charge costs of certain activities, such as insurance and central garage, to individual funds. The assets and liabilities of the internal service funds are included in Governmental Activities in the Statement The items below are not financial resources / (not due and payable) in the current period and, of Net Position.
therefore, are not reported in the governmental funds.
Deferred charge on refunding, net of accumulated amortization has not been reported in the governmental funds. This was capitalized and amortized over the life of the therefore are not reported in the governmental funds.
28 5.a
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5.a
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
General
Disaster Capital
Accounting Improvement
Special Capital Debt
Revenue Projects Service
General Fund Fund Fund
REVENUES
Taxes $24,284,444 $1,990,993 $1,500,000
Licenses and permits 1,026,381 52,995
Fines and forfeitures 167,612
Use of money and property 222,511 $111
Intergovernmental 10,875,321
Charges for current services 3,649,015
Recreation programs 456,080
Other 1,840,182 147,106 320,000 1,091,137
Total Revenues 42,521,546 2,138,099 1,872,995 1,091,248
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government 7,242,859
Public safety 18,582,989
Community development 3,056,701 507
Public works 4,371,543 10,831
Parks, beaches, and recreation 4,785,683
Capital outlay 60,620 552,783 2,269,998
Debt service:
Principal 1,596,632
Interest and fiscal charges 946,574
Total Expenditures 38,100,395 563,614 2,270,505 2,543,206 4,421,151 1,574,485 (397,510) (1,451,958)
Other Financing Sources (Uses):
Proceeds from lease financing 4,000,000
Transfers in (Note 9) 1,130,919 3,820,000 2,541,941
Transfers out (Note 9) (5,105,875)
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) (3,974,956) 3,820,000 6,541,941 446,195 1,574,485 3,422,490 5,089,983
Fund Balances -Beginning, as restated (Note 11c) 15,846,029 4,513,929 3,300,474 227,401 Fund Balances- Ending $16,292,224 $6,088,414 $6,722,964 $5,317,384 See accompanying notes to financial statements
Net Changes in Fund Balances
Excess (Deficit) of Revenues over Expenditures
30 5.a
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) Othe
r
Governmental
Funds Total
$3,622,898 $31,398,335
1,079,376
167,612
1,314 223,936
347,238 11,222,559
51,251 3,700,266
456,080
178,417 3,576,842
4,201,118 51,825,006
208 7,243,067
75,607 18,658,596
15,899 3,073,107
3,760,676 8,143,050
25,379 4,811,062
279,568 3,162,969
1,596,632
946,574
4,157,337 47,635,057
43,781 4,189,949
4,000,000
800,000 8,292,860
(2,833,317)(7,939,192)
(2,033,317) 4,353,668
(1,989,536) 8,543,617
12,665,173 36,553,006
$10,675,637$45,096,623
31 5.a
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) The schedule below reconciles the Net Changes in Fund Balances reported on the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances, which measure only changes in current asset and current liabilities on the modified accrual basis, with the Change in Net Position of Governmental Activities reported in the Statement of Activities, which is prepared on the full accrual basis. $8,543,617
Statement of Activities the cost of those assets is capitalized and allocated over estimated lives and reported as depreciation expense.
Capital outlay expenditures are therefore added back to fund balances 3,810,856 Depreciation expense (2,332,149)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt (4,000,000)
Repayment of debt principal 1,596,632
Interest expense 120,426
Amortization of loss on refunding (139,463)
The amounts below included in the Statement of Activities do not provide 20,642
Net pension liabilities (net change) 1,610,259
Net OPEB liabilities (528,074)
(959,312)
$7,743,434
See accompanying notes to financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
CITY OF PACIFICA
Reconciliation of the
NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES - TOTAL GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
with the
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
Changes in net position of governmental activities
governmental activities.
Net Change in fund balance
issuing debt increase long-term liabilities in the Statement of Net Position. (require) the use of current financial resources and therefore are not reported The net revenues (expenses) of the internal service funds are reported with Bond proceeds provide current financial resources to governmental funds, but Repayment of bond principal is an expenditure in the governmental funds, but in the Statement of Net Position the repayment reduces long-term liabilities.
Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the as revenue or expenditures in governmental funds:
Compensated absences (net change)
The internal services funds are used by management to charge costs of certain activities such as insurance and central garage, to individual funds. different because of the following:
Amounts reported for Governmental Activities in the Statement of Activities are 32 5.a
Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
JUNE 30, 2022
Governmental
Business-Type Activities Activities
Major Non-major Total Internal
Enterprise Fund Enterprise Fund Enterprise Service
Sewer Utility Beach Parking Funds Funds
Assets:
Current Assets:
Cash and investments (Note 3) $7,070,348 $240,182 $7,310,530 $2,670,987 Cash and investments with fiscal agents (Note 3) 4,030,189 4,030,189 Accounts receivable 1,523
Prepaid items 379,264 379,264
Inventory 6,597 6,597 18,715
Total Current Assets 11,486,398 240,182 11,726,580 2,691,225 Noncurrent Assets:
Advance to other funds (Note 9) 649,938 649,938
Capital assets, not being depreciated (Note 4) 5,768,316 5,768,316 258,774 Capital assets, being depreciated, net
of accumulated depreciation (Note 4) 56,747,109 46,439 56,793,548 1,546,619 Total Noncurrent assets 63,165,363 46,439 63,211,802 1,805,393 Total Assets 74,651,761 286,621 74,938,382 4,496,618
Deferred Outflows of Resources
Deferred charge on refunding (Note 5) 207,873 207,873
Related to OPEB (Note 6) 31,401 31,401
Related to pension (Note 7) 719,521 719,521
Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 958,795 958,795
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable 1,235,449 3,319 1,238,768 275,249
Interest payable 75,519 75,519 330
Claims payable due in one year (Note 8) 304,204
Compensated absences due in one year (Note 1M) 179,215 6,602 185,817 43,796 Long term debt due in one year (Note 5) 2,552,671 2,552,671 13,488 Total Current Liabilities 4,042,854 9,921 4,052,775 637,067 Noncurrent Liabilities:
Compensated absences, due in more than one year (Note 1M) 124,539 3,713 128,252 Long term debt due in more than one year (Note 5) 35,120,013 35,120,013 120,707 Net OPEB Liabilities due in more than one year (Note 6) 1,517,682 1,517,682 Net pension liabilities due in more than one year (Note 7) 3,788,519 3,788,519 Total Non-Current Liabilities 40,550,753 3,713 40,554,466 120,707 Total Liabilities 44,593,607 13,634 44,607,241 757,774
Deferred Inflows of Resources:
Related to OPEB (Note 6) 112,275 112,275
Related to pension (Note 7) 94,801 94,801
Total Deferred inflows of Resources 207,076 207,076
Net Position:
Net investment in capital assets 26,051,859 46,439 26,098,298 1,805,393 Unrestricted 4,758,014 226,548 4,984,562 1,933,451
Total Net Position $30,809,873 $272,987 $31,082,860 $3,738,844 See accompanying notes to financial statements
Liabilities:
33 5.a
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES
IN FUND NET POSITION
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Governmental
Business-Type Activities Activities
Major Non-major Total Internal
Enterprise Fund Enterprise Fund Enterprise Service
Sewer Utility Beach Parking Funds Funds
Operating Revenues:
Charges for services $18,617,630 $559,195 $19,176,825 $1,433,408 Other operating income 347,614 347,614 1,064,699
Total Operating Revenues 18,965,244 559,195 19,524,439 2,498,107 Operating Expenses:
Personnel services 4,720,615 512,861 5,233,476 592,253
1,386,098 47,122 1,433,220
Supplies and materials 1,154,653 27,148 1,181,801 519,841 Insurance 811,000 811,000 959,229
Outside contractors 137,710 137,710 342,213
Maintenance 454,521 23,530 478,051 91,380
Utilities 1,870,282 1,870,282
Insurance claims 375,560
Depreciation (Note 4) 4,124,765 9,850 4,134,615 743,427 Total Operating Expenses 14,659,644 620,511 15,280,155 3,623,903 Operating Income (Loss) 4,305,600 (61,316) 4,244,284 (1,125,796) Non-operating revenues (Expenses):
Investment earnings 286,486 286,486
Gain on sale of capital assets 24,491
Interest and fiscal charges (1,581,041) (1,581,041) (3,939) Amortization (17,918) (17,918)
(1,312,473) (1,312,473) 20,552
2,993,127 (61,316) 2,931,811 (1,105,244)
Transfers:
Transfers in (Note 9) 145,932
Transfers out (Note 9) (499,600) (499,600)
2,493,527 (61,316) 2,432,211 (959,312)
Net Position, Beginning of Year, as restated (Note 11) 28,316,346 334,303 28,650,649 4,698,156 Net Position, End of Year $30,809,873 $272,987 $31,082,860 $3,738,844 See accompanying notes to financial statements
Administration
Changes in Net Position
Income (Loss) Before Transfers
Total Non-Operating Revenues (Expenses)
34 5.a
Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5.a
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Governmental
Business-Type Activities Activities
Major Non-major Total Internal
Enterprise Fund Enterprise Fund Enterprise Service
Sewer Utility Beach Parking Funds Funds
Cash flows from operating activities:
Receipts from customers $18,877,905 $567,757 $19,445,662 $2,512,352 Payments to suppliers (5,168,241) (97,513) (5,265,754) (1,657,518) Payments for claims (376,701)
Payments to and on behalf of employees (4,682,698) (521,756) (5,204,454) (574,539) Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities 9,026,966 (51,512) 8,975,454 (96,406) Cash Flows from Noncapital and Related Financing Activities:
Interfund payment (99,600) (99,600)
Interfund receipts 145,932
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Noncapital and
Related Financing Activities (99,600) (99,600) 145,932
Cash Flows from Capital and Related Financing Activities (2,524,422) (2,524,422) (313,434)
Proceeds from sale of capital assets 24,491
Principal payments on bonds and notes (2,737,912) (2,737,912) (12,578) Interest paid (1,583,200) (1,583,200) (3,939)
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Capital
and Related Financing Activities (6,845,534) (6,845,534) (305,460) Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
286,486 286,486
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities 286,486 286,486 2,368,318 (51,512) 2,316,806 (255,934)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the
Beginning of the Fiscal year, restated (Note 11C) 8,732,219 291,694 9,023,913 2,926,921 Cash and Cash Equivalents at the End of the Fiscal Year $11,100,537 $240,182 $11,340,719 $2,670,987 Reconciliation of Cash and Cash Equivalents to
Statement of Net Position:
$7,070,348 $240,182 $7,310,530 $2,670,987
4,030,189 4,030,189
Total Cash and Cash Equivalents $11,100,537 $240,182 $11,340,719 $2,670,987 (Continued)
See accompanying notes to financial statements
Purchase of capital assets
Interest received
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and investments with fiscal agents
Cash and investments
36 5.a
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Governmental
Business-Type Activities Activities
Major Non-major Total Internal
Enterprise Fund Enterprise Fund Enterprise Service
Sewer Utility Beach Parking Funds Funds
Reconciliation of Operating Income (Loss) to
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities:
Operating Income (loss) $4,305,600 ($61,316) $4,244,284 ($1,125,796) Provided (Used) by Operating Activities:
Depreciation 4,124,765 9,850 4,134,615 743,427
(Increase) Decrease in Operating Assets:
Accounts Receivable 291,925 8,562 300,487 14,245
Prepaid Items (379,264) (379,264)
Inventories
Increase (Decrease) in Operating Liabilities:
Accounts payable 646,023 287 646,310 255,163
Due to other funds
Accrued liabilities (18)
Claims payable (1,141)
Net Pension/OPEB Liability,
Deferred Inflows and Deferred Outflows
Compensated Absences 37,917 (8,895) 29,022 17,714
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities $9,026,966 ($51,512) $8,975,454 ($96,406) Noncash Transactions
Amortization of bond premium ($17,918)
See accompanying notes to financial statements
Adjustments to Reconcile Operating Income (Loss) to Net Cash 37 5.a
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION
SUCCESSOR AGENCY
PRIVATE PURPOSE TRUST FUND
JUNE 30, 2022
Assets:
Cash and investments with fiscal agents (Note 3) $232,074 Total Assets 232,074
Accounts payable
Interest payable 27,111
Loan payable to the City - due in more than one year (Note 10) 3,641,599 Long-term debt:
Due within one year (Note 13) 75,000
Due in more than one year (Note 13) 870,000
Total Liabilities 4,613,710
Net Position:
Restricted for Trust Fund (4,381,636)
Total Net Position (Deficit) ($4,381,636)
See accompanying notes to financial statements
Liabilities:
38 5.a
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
PRIVATE PURPOSE TRUST FUND
Additions:
Investment revenue $113
Taxes and assessments 330,243
Total Additions 330,356
Deductions:
Interest expense 113,587
Community development expense 7,000
Total Deductions 120,587
Change in Net Position 209,769
Net Position (Deficit)at Beginning of Year (4,591,405)
Net Position (Deficit) at End of Year ($4,381,636)
See accompanying notes to financial statements
SUCCESSOR AGENCY
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
39 5.a
Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22) This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5.a
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
The basic financial statements of the City of Pacifica (City) have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) as applied to governmental agencies. The Governmental Accounting Standards Boards (“GASB”) is the accepted standard setting body for establishing governmental accounting and financial reporting principles. The more significant accounting principles are described below.
A. Reporting Entity
The City of Pacifica was incorporated November 22, 1957 under the general laws of the State of California and enjoys all the rights and privileges applicable to a General Law City. The City operates under a Council-Manager form of government. There are five Council Members who serve overlapping terms of four years, and the Council, in turn, elects one of the Council Members to serve as Mayor for one year. This legislative body selects a City Manager to administer the affairs of the City. The City provides the following services: public safety (police, fire, and civil defense), highways and streets, sanitation, health and social services, culturerecreation, public improvements, planning and zoning, and general administrative services.
As required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the accompanying financial statements include the financial activities of the City.
The City of Pacifica Financing Authority is a separate government entity whose purpose is to assist with the financing certain public capital facilities for the City through the issuance of bonds or other forms of debt. The Authority is controlled by the City and has the same governing body as the City, which also performs all accounting and administrative functions for the Authority.
The Authority is a blended component unit of the City and does not issue separate financial statements.
The City participates in the ABAG Plan Corporation, a public entity risk pool, whose financial activities are not included in the basic financial statements as it is administered by a board, separate from and independent of the City (See Note 8).
There are no other entities which meet the Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 14 as amended by GASB Statements No. 39 and No. 61, criteria for blended or discrete disclosure within these financial statements.
B. Basis of Presentation
The City’s basic financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is the acknowledged standard-setting body for establishing accounting and financial reporting standards followed by governmental entities in the United States of America. 41 5.a
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued):
B. Basis of Presentation (Continued)
The City’s government-wide financial statements include a Statement of Net Position, and a Statement of Activities. These statements present summaries of governmental activities and business-type activities for the City, accompanied by a total column. These financial statements include the financial activities of the overall City government, except for fiduciary activities.
Eliminations have been made to minimize the double counting of internal activities.
Governmental activities are financed generally through taxes, intergovernmental revenues, and other nonexchange transactions. Business-type activities (Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund) are financed generally through user fees.
C. Government-wide and Fund Financial Statements
The Statement of Activities presents a comparison between direct expenses and program revenues for each function of the City’s governmental activities. Direct expenses are those that are specifically associated with a program or function and therefore are clearly identifiable to a particular function. Program revenues include three categories: (1) charges for services, (2) operating grants and contributions and (3) capital grants and contributions. Revenues that are not classified as program revenues, including all taxes, are presented as general revenues.
Interfund services provided and used are not eliminated in the process of consolidation on the Statement of Activities.
Certain eliminations have been made as prescribed by Governmental Accounting Standards Board No.34, Basic Financial Statements-and Management’s Discussion and Analysis-for State and Local Governments (“GASB No. 34”) in regard to interfund activities, payables and receivables.
D. Financial Statements
Governmental fund financial statements include a Balance Sheet and a Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances for all major governmental funds and non-major funds aggregated. An accompanying schedule is presented to reconcile and explain the differences in fund balance as presented in these statements to the net position presented in the government-wide financial statements.
The governmental fund financial statements provide information about the City’s funds.
Separate statements for each fund category–governmental, proprietary, and fiduciary–are presented. The emphasis of fund financial statements is on major individual funds, each of which is displayed in a separate column. All remaining governmental funds are aggregated and reported as nonmajor funds.
Proprietary fund financial statements include a Statement of Net Position, a Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position, and a Statement of Cash Flows for all proprietary funds. The internal service funds are also presented in these statements. However, internal service balances and activities have been combined with the governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements.
42 5.a
Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued):
D. Financial Statements (Continued)
Proprietary funds are accounted for using the “economic resources” measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Accordingly, all assets and liabilities (whether current or noncurrent) are included on the Statement of Net Position. The Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position presents increases (revenues) and decreases (expenses) in total net position. Under the accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized in the period in which they are earned while expenses are recognized in the period in which liabilities are incurred.
Operating revenues in the proprietary funds are those revenues that are generated from the primary operation of the fund. All other revenues are reported as nonoperating revenues.
Operating expenses are those expenses that are essential to the primary operations of the fund.
All other expenses are reported as nonoperating expenses.
Fiduciary Fund Financial Statements include a Statement of Net Position and a Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position. Fiduciary funds represent private-purpose trust funds, which the City serves as a trustee for the Successor Agency. Trust funds are accounted for on an economic resources measurement focus and full accrual basis of accounting. The City has one RDA Successor Agency private-purpose trust fund.
E. Major Funds
GASB 34 defines major funds and requires that the City’s major governmental funds be identified and presented separately in the Fund financial statements. All other governmental funds, called non-major funds, are combined and reported in a single column, regardless of their fund-type. Major funds are defined as funds which have either assets and deferred outflows, liabilities and deferred inflows, revenues or expenditures/expenses equal to or greater than ten percent of their fund-type total and five percent of the grand total of all fund types, excluding fiduciary. The general fund is always a major fund. The major funds of the City are:
• General Fund – The General Fund is used to account for the resources to carry out basic governmental activities of the City such as general government, public safety, public works, community development, and parks, beaches, and recreation, which are not required to be accounted for in another fund. • Disaster Accounting Special Revenue Fund – This fund is used to account for all revenues received and expenditures incurred due to natural and man-made disasters.
• General Capital Improvement Capital Projects Fund – This fund is used to account for revenues derived from fees and apportionments from General Fund to be used for the acquisition, construction, and improvement of major capital facilities of the City.
• Debt Service Fund – This fund is used to account for the accumulated and the disbursement of account for expenditures and financing of various long-term debt liabilities.
43 5.a
Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued):
E. Major Funds (Continued)
The City reports the following major enterprise fund:
• The Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund – This fund accounts for the operation and maintenance of the City’s wastewater collection system including operating costs of the wastewater collection system and water recycling plant.
Additionally, the City reports the following fund types:
• The Internal Service Funds account for the financing of goods or services provided by one department or agency to other departments or agencies of the government and to other government units on a cost reimbursement basis. The City has two internal service funds, the Motor Pool Fund and the Self Insurance Fund. The Motor Pool Fund accounts for the City’s central garage, and the Self Insurance Fund accounts for the employee dental, workers’ compensation, general liability, property, and automobile liability insurance. • The RDA Successor Agency Private-Purpose Trust Fund accounts for the former Redevelopment Agency activities.
F. Basis of Accounting
The Government-wide, Proprietary funds, and Fiduciary funds financial statements are required by GASB 34 to be reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Accordingly, all of the City’s assets and deferred outflows, liabilities and deferred inflows, including capital assets and long-term liabilities, are included in the accompanying Statement of Net Position. The Statement of Activities presents changes in net position.
Under the accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized in the period in which they are earned, while expenses are recognized in the period in which the liability is incurred regardless of when the related cash flows take place.
The Governmental funds financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus, and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Accordingly, only current assets and liabilities (except for long-term advances from the City) are included in the Balance Sheet. The Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances present increases (revenues and other financing sources) and decreases (expenditures and other financing uses) in net current assets. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized in the accounting period in which they become both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period.
44 5.a
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued):
F. Basis of Accounting (Continued)
The City considers all revenues reported in the governmental funds to be available if the revenue are collected within ninety days after fiscal year end. The primary revenue sources, which have been treated as susceptible to accrual by the City, are property taxes, sales taxes, intergovernmental revenues, other taxes and investment earnings. Expenditures are recorded in the accounting period in which the related fund liability is incurred, except for principal and interest on long-term debt and compensated absences, which are recognized as expenditures to the extent that they have matured. Capital asset acquisitions are reported as expenditures in governmental funds. Proceeds of long-term debt and acquisitions under capital leases are reported as other financing sources.
Non-exchange transactions, in which the City gives or receives value without directly receiving or giving value in exchange, include taxes, grants, entitlements and donations. On the accrual basis, revenue from taxes is recognized in the fiscal year for which the taxes are levied or assessed. Revenue from grants, entitlements and donations is recognized in the fiscal year in which all eligibility requirements have been satisfied.
Grant revenues are recognized in the fiscal year in which all eligibility requirements are met.
Under the terms of grant agreements, the City may fund certain programs with a combination of cost-reimbursement grants, categorical block grants and general revenues. Thus, both restricted and unrestricted net position may be available to finance program expenditures. The City’s policy is to first apply restricted grant resources to such programs, followed by general revenues if necessary.
G. Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the City considered cash and cash equivalents (investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase) as short term, highly liquid investments that are both readily convertible to known amounts of cash and so near their maturity that they present insignificant risk of changes in value because of changes in interest rates. The City follows the practice of pooling the cash of all funds, including the City’s Enterprise and Internal Service Funds.
H. Investments
Investments are reported at fair value, except for investments that are not transferable and have terms that are not affected by change in market rates are reported at cost.
Changes in fair value that occur during a fiscal year are recognized as revenues from use of money reported for that fiscal year. Revenues from use of money include interest earnings, change in fair value, gains or losses realized upon the liquidation, maturity, or sale of investment and rental income. Changes in the fair value of investments during this fiscal year were calculated and booked.
45 5.a
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued):
I. Receivables and Payables
All accounts, grants, tax, and note receivables are shown net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts if applicable, and estimated refunds due.
J. Inventories and Prepaid Items
General fund inventories are recorded as expenditures when consumed, rather than when purchased. These inventories are stated at cost, using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
Inventories in the proprietary funds are stated at the lower of cost or market, and consist of expendable materials and supplies.
Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods, and are recorded as prepaid items in both the government-wide and fund financial statements.
Inventories and prepaid items, as reported in the fund financial statements, are offset by nonspendable fund balance for noncurrent assets in governmental funds, to indicate that they do not constitute resources available for appropriation.
K. Capital Assets
The City’s assets are capitalized at historical cost or estimated historical cost on the government-wide Statement of Net Position and the proprietary fund financial statements. City policy has set the capitalization threshold for reporting capital assets at $5,000. Gifts or contributions of capital assets are recorded at fair value on the date donated. Depreciation of capital assets is charged as an expense each year, and the total amount of accumulated depreciation taken over the years, is reported on the respective statements as a reduction in the book value of capital assets.
L. Encumbrances
The City uses encumbrances to control expenditure commitments for the year. Encumbrances represent commitments related to executor contracts not yet performed and purchase orders not yet filled. Commitments for such expenditure of monies are encumbered to reserve a portion of applicable appropriations. Encumbrances still open at year end are not accounted for as expenditures and liabilities, but as restricted, or unassigned fund balance.
M. Compensated Absences
City employees accrue vacation, sick, holiday, and compensatory time off benefits. An employee may accumulate vacation time equal to an amount as stipulated in their contracts. No cash compensation is payable for accrued vacation until the employee terminates employment.
Sick leave is compensated in cash only upon an employee's retirement. Maximum limit per employee is $3,000 or one quarter of employee's sick leave credit, whichever is lower. Two employee groups have elected to participate in a retirement health savings program and have directed vacation and limited sick leave cash out to separation of this program. It is the City’s policy to allow employees to accumulate compensatory time within set limits instead of drawing overtime. This accumulation may subsequently be exchanged into cash or time taken. 46 5.a
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued):
M. Compensated Absences (Continued)
All vacation pay is accrued when incurred in the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements. A liability for these amounts is reported in the governmental funds only when they have matured (such as vacation time, estimated to be paid upon retirement by the end of the fiscal year with expendable available financial resources). Each fiscal year, an adjustment to the liability is made based on pay rate changes and adjustments for the current portion. The General Fund is primarily responsible for the repayment of the governmental portion of compensated absences.
Changes in compensated absences for the year ended June 30, 2022, were as follows:
Governmental
BusinessType
Activities Activities Total
Beginning Balance $1,621,848 $285,047 $1,906,895
Additions 1,225,911 277,776 1,503,687
Payments (1,228,839) (248,754) (1,477,593)
Ending Balance $1,618,920 $314,069 $1,932,989
Current Portion $922,784 $185,817 $1,108,601
Non-current Portion $696,136 $128,252 $824,388
N. Property Tax Revenues
California Constitution Article XIII A limits the combined property tax rate to one percent of a property’s assessed valuation. Additional taxes may be imposed with voter approval. Assessed value is calculated at one hundred percent of a property’s fair value, as defined by Article XIII A, and may be increased no more than two percent per year unless a change in ownership occurs.
The County of San Mateo collects the taxes and distributes them to taxing jurisdictions on the basis of assessed valuations subject to adjustments for voter-approved debt. The City receives property taxes pursuant to an arrangement with the County known as the “Teeter Plan,” whereby the County assumes responsibility for the collection of delinquent taxes and pays the full allocation to the City. The City recognizes property tax revenues (including tax increment revenues) to the extent of each year’s tax allocation received or to be received within 60 days after the end of each fiscal year.
47 5.a
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued):
N. Property Tax Revenues (Continued)
The County assesses properties, bills for, collects, and distributes property taxes per the following schedule:
Secured Unsecured
Valuation dates January 1 January 1
Lien/Levy dates July 1 July 1
Due dates 50% on November 1
50% on February 1
July 1
Delinquent as of December 10
April 10
August 31
The term “Unsecured” refers to taxes on personal property other than real estate, land, and buildings. These taxes are secured by liens on property being taxed.
O. Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
P. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The City categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy established by generally accepted accounting principles. The fair value hierarchy categorizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market.
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 inputs are inputs – other than quoted prices included within level 1 – that are observable for an asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for an asset or liability.
If the fair value of an asset or liability is measured using inputs from more than one level of the fair value hierarchy, the measurement is considered to be based on the lowest priority level input that is significant to the entire measurement.
48 5.a
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued):
Q. Expenditures in Excess of Appropriations
The following funds incurred departmental expenditures in excess of appropriations:
Fund/Department
Excess of
Expenditures Over
Appropriations
Major Funds:
General Fund:
General Government $510,608
Public Safety 262,617
Capital Outlay 6,688
Disaster Accounting Special Revenue Fund 56,941
Non-major Special Revenue Funds:
Gax Tax 30,167
Supplemental Law Enforcement Services 41,189
NPDES Stormwater 5,218
Parks, Beaches and Recreation 25,379
Highway 1 Improvement 41,636
R. Leases
As clarified by the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 87, a lease is defined as a contract that conveys control of the right to use another entity's nonfinancial asset (the underlying asset) as specified in the contract for a period of time in an exchange or exchange-like transaction. Examples of nonfinancial assets include buildings, land, vehicles, and equipment. The Town recognizes lease receivables or liabilities with an initial, individual value of $150,000 or more, based on the future lease payments remaining at the start of the lease.
The City has no leases subject to GASB Statement No. 87 for the fiscal year 2022. 49 5.a
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 2 – Stewardship, Compliance, and Accountability:
A. Budgetary information
The City operates under the general law of the State of California, and annually adopts a budget to be effective July 1 for the ensuing fiscal year. The City Manager submits a Preliminary Budget to the City Council on or about May 15 each year. This Preliminary Budget is the fiscal plan for the ensuing twelve months starting July 1, and includes proposals for expenditures for operations and capital improvement, and the resources to meet them. City Council conducts public hearings in the Council Chambers before adopting the budget. The Council approves total appropriations at the department level in the General Fund, and at the fund level in other funds. The Budget is adopted by City resolution prior to June 30.
The appropriated budget is prepared by fund, function, and department. The City Manager is authorized to transfer budget appropriations within departments in conformance with the adopted policies set by the City Council. All other transfers must be approved by the City Council. Any revisions that alter the total expenditures of any department must be approved by the City Council. Expenditures are budgeted at, and may not legally exceed, the department level for the General Fund and the fund level for Special Revenue, Debt Service, Capital Projects and Internal Service Funds. Budgeted amounts shown are as originally adopted, or as amended by the City Council during the fiscal year. During the fiscal year, several supplementary appropriations were necessary.
Budgets for General, Special Revenue, Debt Service, Capital Projects, and Internal Service Funds are adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP). Except for Capital Project Funds, appropriations lapse at fiscal year-end and are re-budgeted for the coming year. The following capital projects funds are not budgeted annually: Aircraft Noise Project Fund, Excess ERAF Fund and Pacific Library Fund. The Parking In-lieu Special Revenue Fund is only budgeted when the need for expenditure arises.
Encumbrances represent commitments related to unperformed contracts for goods or services.
Encumbrance accounting, under which purchase orders, contracts, and other commitments for the expenditure of monies are recorded in order to reserve that portion of the applicable appropriation, is employed as an extension of formal budgetary integration in the governmental funds. Encumbrances outstanding at fiscal year-end are recorded as restricted, committed, or assigned fund balances and do not constitute expenditures or liabilities because the commitments will be honored during the subsequent fiscal year.
B. Deficit Fund Balances/Net Position
As of June 30, 2022, the following funds had a deficit net position/fund balance:
Gax Tax Special Revenue Fund $188,655
Planned Local Drainage Capital Projects Fund 470,190
The deficits in these governmental funds are due to the City paying expenditures in advance of receiving revenues. These deficits are going to be repaid once reimbursements are received from the funding source, and if there are any outstanding deficits after the repayments, or if needed, the General Fund would cover these deficits when the fund is closed out. 50 5.a
Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 3 – Cash and Investments:
Cash and investments as of June 30, 2022 are classified in the accompanying financial statements as follows:
Statement of net position:
Cash and investments $45,729,968
Cash and investments with fiscal agents 8,630,417
Restricted cash and investments 3,001,260
Statement of fiduciary net position:
Cash and investments with fiscal agents 232,074
Total cash and investments $57,593,719
A. Investments Authorized by the California Government Code and the City’s Investment Policy
The table below identifies the investment types that are authorized for the City by the California Government Code (or the City’s investment policy, where more restrictive). The table also identifies certain provisions of the California Government Code (or the City’s investment policy, where more restrictive) that address interest rate risk, credit risk, and concentration of credit risk. This table does not address investments of debt proceeds held by bond trustee that are governed by the provisions of debt agreements of the City, rather than the general provisions of the California Government Code or the City’s investment policy.
Authorized Investment Type
Maximum
Maturity
Minimum
Credit
Quality
Maximum
Percentage/
Investment
of Portfolio
Maximum
Investment
in One
Issuer
Commercial Paper 270 days A 25% None
Bankers Acceptances 180 days A 40% None
U.S. Treasury Obligations 5 years None 50% None
U.S. Government Agency Issues 5 years None 50% None
Certificates of Deposit 5 years None 30% None
State of California Local Agency
Investment Fund (State Pool) N/A None $75,000,000 $75,000,000 Banks and Savings and Loan Time
Deposits N/A A-1+ 30% None
Repurchase Agreements 1 year None 15% None
Mutual Funds 5 years AAAm 15% None
51 5.a
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 3 – Cash and Investments (Continued):
B. Investments Authorized by Debt Agreements
Investment of debt proceeds held by trustees is governed by provisions of the debt agreements, rather than the general provisions of the California Government Code or the City’s investment policy. The table below identifies the investment types that are authorized for investments held by trustee. The table also identifies certain provisions of these debt agreements that address interest rate risk, credit risk, and concentration of credit risk.
Authorized Investment Type
Maximum
Maturity
Minimum Credit
Quality
Municipal Bonds None AAA
Commercial Paper 270 days A-1
U.S. Treasury Obligations None None
U.S. Agency Securities None None
Time Deposits (Unsecured) 30 days A-1
Money Market Funds None AAAm
Investment Contracts None AALocal Agency Investment Fund None None Certificates of Deposit 1 year A-1+
Bankers Acceptances 1 year A-1+
Pre-refunding Municipal Bonds None AAA
State and Municipal Bonds None Two Highest Categories
C. Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. Generally, the longer the maturity of an investment, the greater the sensitivity of its fair value to change in market interest rates. One of the ways that the City manages its exposure to interest rate risk is by purchasing a combination of shorter term and longer term investments and by timing cash flows from maturities so that a portion of the portfolio is maturing or coming close to maturity evenly over time as necessary to provide the cash flows and liquidity needed for operations.
Information about the sensitivity of the fair values of the City’s investments and those held by trustees to market interest rate fluctuations is provided by the following table that shows the distribution of the City’s investments by maturity:
12 Months
Investment Type Or Less Totals
California Local Agency Investment Fund $17,659,466 $17,659,466 Held by Trustees:
Money Market Fund 8,846,009 8,846,009
Total Investments $26,505,475 26,505,475
Cash in Banks 31,084,799
Petty Cash 3,445
Total Cash 31,088,244
Total Cash and Investments $57,593,719
Remaining Maturity (in Months)
52 5.a
Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 3 – Cash and Investments (Continued):
C. Interest Rate Risk (Continued)
Money market mutual funds are available for withdrawal on demand at June 30, 2022, and have an average maturity of less than 45 days.
The City does not hold any specific investments that are highly sensitive to interest rate fluctuations (to a greater degree than already indicated in the information provided above).
D. Fair Value Hierarchy
The City categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy established by generally accepted accounting principles. The hierarchy is based on the valuation inputs used to measure fair value of the assets. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in an active market for identical assets; Level 2 inputs are significant other observable inputs; and Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable inputs.
Investment in the California Local Agency Investment Fund and money market mutual funds are classified as exempt in the fair value hierarchy, as it is valued at amortized cost, which is exempt from being classified under GASB 72.
E. Credit Risk
Generally, credit risk is the risk that an issuer of an investment will not fulfill its obligation to the holder of the investment. This is measured by the assignment of a rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Presented below is the minimum rating required by (where applicable) the California Government Code, the City’s investment policy, or debt agreements, and the actual rating as of fiscal year end for each investment type.
Investment Type AAAm Not Rated Total
California Local Agency Investment Fund $17,659,466 $17,659,466 Held by Trustees:
Money Market Fund $8,846,009 8,846,009
Total Investments $8,846,009 $17,659,466 26,505,475
Cash in Banks 31,084,799
Petty Cash 3,445
Total Cash 31,088,244
Total Cash and Investments $57,593,719
Rating as of Fiscal Year End
F. Concentration of Credit Risk
The investment policy of the City contains limitations on the amount that can be invested in any one issuer. The City has no investments in any one issuer (other than money market funds and an external investment pool) that represent 5% or more of total City investments. 53 5.a
Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 3 – Cash and Investments (Continued):
G. Custodial Credit Risk
Custodial credit risk for deposits is the risk that, in the event of the failure of a depository financial institution, a government will not be able to recover its deposits or will not be able to recover collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The custodial credit risk for investments is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterparty (e.g., brokerdealer) to a transaction, a government will not be able to recover the value of its investment or collateral securities that are in the possession of another party. The California Government Code and the City’s investment policy do not contain legal or policy requirements that would limit the exposure to custodial credit risk for deposits or investments, other than the following provision for deposits. The California Government Code requires that a financial institution secure deposits made by state or local governmental units by pledging securities in an undivided collateral pool held by a depository regulated under state law (unless so waived by the governmental unit). The fair value of the pledged securities in the collateral pool must equal at least 110% of the total amount deposited by the public agencies. California law also allows financial institutions to secure City deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150% of the secured public deposits.
As of June 30, 2022, all of the City’s deposits with financial institutions in excess of federal depository insurance limits were held in collateralized accounts.
H. Investment in State Investment Pool
The City is a voluntary participant in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) that is regulated by the California Government Code under the oversight of the Treasurer of the State of California. The fair value of the City’s investment in this pool is reported in the accompanying financial statements at amounts based upon the City’s pro-rata share of the fair value provided by LAIF for the entire LAIF portfolio (in relation to the amortized cost of that portfolio). The balance available for withdrawal is based on the accounting records maintained by LAIF, which are recorded on an amortized cost basis. At June 30, 2022, these investments have an average maturity of 291 days.
I. Investment held in Trust for Pension Benefits
The City established an irrevocable Section 115 Pension Trust with Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) in the fiscal year 2021. As of June 30, 2022, the trust had a balance of $342,510. PARS’ policy for allocation of invested assets is established as:
Asset Target
Global Equity 20-40%
Fixed Income 50-80%
Cash 0-20%
At June 30, 2022, PARS held no investments in any one organization that represented 5% of more of fiduciary net position.
54 5.a
Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 4 – Capital Assets:
All capital assets are valued at historical cost or estimated cost if actual historical cost is not available. Donated capital assets and those received in a service concession arrangement are recorded at acquisition value at the date of donation. Acquisition value is the price that would be paid to acquire an asset with equivalent service potential on the date of the donation. GASB Statement No.34 requires that all capital assets with limited useful lives be depreciated over their estimated useful lives. The purpose of the depreciation is to spread the cost of the capital assets equitably among all users over the life of these assets. The amount charged to depreciation expense each year represents that year’s pro-rata share of the cost of the capital assets. Depreciation is provided using the straight–line method over its expected useful life.
Capital assets with a value of $5,000 or more are capitalized.
The City has assigned the following useful lives to capital assets: Buildings and improvements (25-30 years); Police Vehicles (4 years); Other Vehicles (5-25 years); Machinery and Equipment (5-15 years); Collection System (20 years); and Infrastructure (15-30 years).
The following is a summary of capital assets for governmental activities as of June 30, 2022:
Balance Balance
June 30, 2021 Additions Deletions Transfers June 30, 2022 Capital assets not being depreciated:
$40,445,580 $40,445,580
9,080,303 $3,090,515 ($5,682,461) 6,488,358
Total capital assets not being depreciated 49,525,883 3,090,515 (5,682,461) 46,933,938 Buildings & improvements 16,308,692 297,853 16,606,545
8,357,876 313,434 ($203,514) 8,467,796
3,541,025 3,541,025
Infrastructure 46,268,178 223,925 5,682,461 52,174,564
Total capital assets being depreciated 74,475,771 835,212 (203,514) 5,682,461 80,789,930 Buildings & improvements (11,212,497) (452,952) (11,665,449) (6,573,624) (519,720) (7,093,344)
(3,093,939) (165,184) 203,514 (3,055,609)
(15,610,626) (1,739,158) (17,349,784)
Total accumulated depreciation (36,490,686) (2,877,014) 203,514 (39,164,186) Depreciable capital assets, net 37,985,085 (2,041,802) 5,682,461 41,625,744 Total capital assets, net $87,510,968 $1,048,713 $88,559,682 Land
Capital assets being depreciated:
Construction in progress
Machinery & equipment
Infrastructure
Vehicles
Machinery and equipment
Less accumulated depreciation for:
Vehicles
Depreciation expense for governmental activities was charged to functions as follows:
General government $118,302
Public safety 381,541
Public works 1,597,982
Parks, beaches, and recreation 35,762
Internal Service Fund 743,427
Total Governmental Activities $2,877,014
55 5.a
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 4 – Capital Assets (Continued):
The following is a summary of capital assets for business-type activities as of June 30, 2022:
Balance Balance
June 30, 2021 Additions Transfers June 30, 2022
Capital assets not being depreciated:
$4,014,412 $4,014,412
3,529,995 $839,610 ($2,615,701) 1,753,904
Total capital assets not being depreciated 7,544,407 839,610 (2,615,701) 5,768,316 Buildings & improvements 77,581,869 106,460 77,688,329
44,857,044 1,259,030 2,615,701 48,731,775
3,881,638 319,322 4,200,960
Total capital assets being depreciated 126,320,551 1,684,812 2,615,701 130,621,064 Buildings & improvements (56,975,908) (1,909,107) (58,885,015) (10,623,645) (1,943,976) (12,567,621)
(2,093,348) (281,532) (2,374,880)
Total accumulated depreciation (69,692,901) (4,134,615) (73,827,516) Depreciable capital assets, net 56,627,650 (2,449,803) 2,615,701 56,793,548 Total capital assets, net $64,172,057 ($1,610,193) $62,561,864 Collection system
Machinery & equipment
Land
Depreciable capital assets:
Collection system
Machinery and equipment
Construction in progress
Less accumulated depreciation for:
NOTE 5 – Long-Term Debt:
The City generally incurs debt to finance projects or purchase assets, which will have useful lives equal to or greater than the related debt. The City’s debt issues and transactions related to both governmental and business-type activities are summarized below and discussed in detail subsequently.
Governmental Activities:
Balance Balance Due within
July 1, 2021 Additions Retirements June 30, 2022 One Year $14,200,000 ($725,000) $13,475,000 $705,000
1,838,067 (114,879) 1,723,188
Sub-total COP 16,038,067 (839,879) 15,198,188 705,000
206,149 (136,069) 70,080 70,080
$4,000,000 4,000,000
Sub-total capital leases 206,149 4,000,000 (136,069) 4,070,080 70,080 2019 Pension obligation refunding bond
(88.622%) 8,583,041 (735,563) 7,847,478 788,736
Total Governmental Activities $24,827,257 $4,000,000 ($1,711,511) $27,115,746 $1,563,816 Pension Obligation Bonds:
Certificates of Participation:
Capital Lease Payable (Direct borrowing):
Energy retrofit lease
2016 COP
Premium
2021 Civic Center lease
56 5.a
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 5 – Long-Term Debt (Continued):
Business-type Activities:
Balance Balance Due within
July 1, 2021 Retirements June 30, 2022 One Year
$6,740,000 $6,740,000 $1,520,000
Net Premium 632,654 ($118,623) 514,031
2017 Wastewater Revenue Bonds 22,100,000 22,100,000 625,000 Net Premium 3,426,656 (163,174) 3,263,482
Sub-total Revenue bonds: 32,899,310 (281,797) 32,617,513 2,145,000 2019 Pension obligation bond
1,101,959 (94,437) 1,007,522 101,264
State of California Water
Resources Board 2,065,918 (2,065,918)
Loan and Installment Agreement 4,343,408 (295,759) 4,047,649 306,407 Total notes payable 6,409,326 (2,361,677) 4,047,649 306,407 Total Business-Type Activities: $40,410,595 ($2,737,911) $37,672,684 $2,552,671 Notes payable (Direct Borrowing):
2014 Wastewater Revenue Refunding
Revenue bonds:
Pension Obligation bonds:
(11.378%)
A. Governmental Activities Debt
2021 Civic Center Campus Improvement Project Lease Financing (Direct Borrowing):
On April 26, 2021, the Pacifica City Council provided input on the Civic Center Renovation conceptual design and approved the funding strategy. The Civic Center Project is estimated to cost about $10 million. The basic funding strategy entails $6 million in various one-time sources of funding while financing the remaining $4 million. On November 22, 2021, the City adopted a Resolution of the Board of Directors of the City of Pacifica Financing Authority approving lease financing in the aggregate amount of $4 million to finance a portion of the construction of the Civic Center Campus Improvement Project. Sterling National Bank was chosen from seven financial institutions who responded to the request for proposal. The loan is a 15-year loan at
1.97% and the bank will commit to provide the City with an additional $1 million within a 24- month period if the City chooses to increase the borrowing amount. Lease payments are payable semiannually on July 1 and January 1, commencing July 1, 2022. The lease ends on July 1, 2036.
57 5.a
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 5 – Long-Term Debt (Continued):
A. Governmental Activities Debt (Continued)
Annual debt service requirements, to maturity, for the 2021 Civic Center Lease are as follows:
Fiscal year ended Principal Interest Total
2023 $85,586 $85,586
2024 $50,000 78,308 128,308
2025 75,000 77,076 152,076
2026 100,000 75,353 175,353
2027 311,000 71,304 382,304
2028 - 2032 1,648,000 261,321 1,909,321
2033 - 2037 1,816,000 90,856 1,906,856
Total $4,000,000 $739,803 $4,739,803
2016 Certificates of Participation: On October 5, 2016, the City of Pacifica issued Certificates of Participation (COP) in the amount of $14,680,000 (par value) payable annually beginning January 1, 2021 and with interest rates ranging from 3.000% to 5.000%, payable each July 1 and January 1, beginning January 1, 2017. The COP matures on January 1, 2037. The purpose of the COP is to (i) prepay and defease certain outstanding certificates of participation which were executed and delivered in 2008 for the purpose of financing and refinancing various municipal improvements of the City, and (ii) pay certain costs of executing and delivering the Certificates
Accounting gains or losses resulting from advance refunding of long-term debt is deferred and amortized over the shorter of the life of the new debt or refunded debt. The deferred charge on refunding balance at June 30, 2022 was $422,062 for the 2016 COP.
The Bonds are general obligations of the City, payable solely by the City. The bond covenants contain events of default that require the revenue of the City to be applied by the Trustee as specified in the terms of the agreement if any of the following conditions occur: default on debt service payments; the failure of the City to observe or perform the conditions, covenants, or agreement terms of the debt; bankruptcy filing by the City; or if any court or competent jurisdiction shall assume custody or control of the City. No such events occurred during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022.
58 5.a
Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 5 – Long-Term Debt (Continued):
A. Governmental Activities Debt (Continued)
Annual debt service requirements, to maturity, for the 2016 Certificates of Participation are as follows:
Fiscal year ended Principal Interest Total
2023 $705,000 $601,600 $1,306,600
2024 760,000 566,350 1,326,350
2025 760,000 528,350 1,288,350
2026 815,000 490,350 1,305,350
2027 790,000 449,600 1,239,600
2028 - 2032 4,520,000 1,608,500 6,128,500
2033 - 2037 5,125,000 526,000 5,651,000
Total $13,475,000 $4,770,750 $18,245,750
Energy Retrofit Lease (Direct Borrowing): On November 1, 2012, the City entered into a lease/purchase agreement with Holman Capital Corporation for energy efficiency measures at various City owned buildings. The effective interest rate on the lease is 4.0% and lease payments are payable semiannually on November 15 and May 15, commencing May 15, 2013.
The lease ends on November 15, 2022.
Annual debt service requirements, to maturity, for the Energy Retrofit Lease are as follows:
Fiscal year ended Principal Interest Total
2023 $70,080 $1,402 $71,482
Total $70,080 $1,402 $71,482
59 5.a
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 5 – Long-Term Debt (Continued):
A. Governmental Activities Debt (Continued)
2019 Taxable Pension Obligation Refunding Bonds: During September 2019, the City of Pacifica issued $9,685,000 of Pension Obligation Refunding Bonds bearing interest between
2.243% and 3.060% and payable semiannually on June 1 and December 1 each year, commencing June 1, 2020. The bonds mature on June 1, 2030. These bonds were issued to refund in full the 2010 taxable pension obligation bonds outstanding principle amount of $8,995,000 and pay costs of issuance of the bonds. Approximately 88.622% of the bond proceeds were allocated to governmental activities (including 1.52% to the Motor Pool internal service fund).
The Bonds are general obligations of the City, payable solely by the City. The bond covenants contain events of default that require the revenue of the City to be applied by the Trustee as specified in the terms of the agreement if any of the following conditions occur: default on debt service payments; the failure of the City to observe or perform the conditions, covenants, or agreement terms of the debt; bankruptcy filing by the City; or if any court or competent jurisdiction shall assume custody or control of the City. No such events occurred during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022.
Annual debt service requirements, to maturity, for the 2019 Pension Obligation Refunding Bonds (governmental portion) are as follows:
Fiscal year ended Principal Interest Total
2023 $788,736 $214,927 $1,003,663
2024 841,909 197,038 1,038,947
2025 899,513 177,102 1,076,615
2026 957,118 154,047 1,111,165
2027 1,028,015 128,559 1,156,574
2028 - 2030 3,332,187 199,279 3,531,466
Total $7,847,478 $1,070,952 $8,918,430
B. Business Type Activities Debt
Loan and Installment Agreement (Direct Borrowing): On August 27, 2012, the City of Pacifica entered into a loan and installment agreement with the City of Pacifica Financing Authority in the amount of $6,402,594 payable annually beginning July 1, 2013 at an interest rate of 3.6%, payable each July 1 and January 1, beginning January 1, 2013. The agreement matures on July 1, 2032. The purpose of this agreement is to (i) fund an escrow to cause the mandatory tender of the outstanding 2001B Wastewater Revenue Bonds (ii) provide funds relating to the Equalization Basin Project, the Collection System Capacity Improvement Projects, and the Collection System Repair, Rehabilitation, and Replacement Projects, (iii) fund certain costs relating to the defeasance of the 2001B Wastewater Revenue Bonds, (iv) fund or provide for satisfaction of the Reserve Fund Requirement, and (vi) pay the costs incurred in connection with the execution of the Loan and Installment Sale. 60 5.a
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 5 – Long-Term Debt (Continued):
B. Business Type Activities Debt (Continued)
Accounting gains or losses resulting from advance refunding of long-term debt is deferred and amortized over the shorter of the life of the new debt or refunded debt. The deferred charge on refunding balance at June 30, 2022 was $168,381 for the Loan and Installment Sale.
The defeased 2001B Wastewater Revenue Bonds have been paid off. Annual debt service requirements, to maturity, for the Loan and Installment Agreement are as follows:
Fiscal year ended Principal Interest Total
2023 $306,407 $140,200 $446,607
2024 317,437 128,970 446,407
2025 328,865 117,337 446,202
2026 340,746 105,285 446,031
2027 352,970 92,799 445,769
2028 - 2032 1,964,852 260,392 2,225,244
2033 436,372 7,855 444,227
Total $4,047,649 $852,838 $4,900,487
2019 Taxable Pension Obligation Refunding Bonds: During September 2019, the City of Pacifica issued $9,685,000 of Pension Obligation Refunding Bonds bearing interest between
2.243% and 3.060% and payable semiannually on June 1 and December 1 each year, commencing June 1, 2020. The bonds mature on June 1, 2030. These bonds are being issued to refund in full the 2010 taxable pension obligation bonds outstanding principle amount of $8,995,000 and pay costs of issuance of the bonds. Approximately 11.378% of the bond proceeds were allocated to business-type activities.
The Bonds are general obligations of the City, payable solely by the City. The bond covenants contain events of default that require the revenue of the City to be applied by the Trustee as specified in the terms of the agreement if any of the following conditions occur: default on debt service payments; the failure of the City to observe or perform the conditions, covenants, or agreement terms of the debt; bankruptcy filing by the City; or if any court or competent jurisdiction shall assume custody or control of the City. No such events occurred during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022.
Annual debt service requirements, to maturity, for the 2019 Pension Obligation Refunding Bonds (business portion) are as follows:
Fiscal year ended Principal Interest Total
2023 $101,264 $27,594 $128,858
2024 108,091 25,297 133,388
2025 115,487 22,738 138,225
2026 122,882 19,778 142,660
2027 131,985 16,505 148,490
2028 - 2030 427,813 25,586 453,399
Total $1,007,522 $137,498 $1,145,020
61 5.a
Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 5 – Long-Term Debt (Continued):
B. Business Type Activities Debt (Continued)
State of California Water Resource Control Board Loan (Direct Borrowing): On February 20, 1997, the State of California Water Resource Control Board entered into an agreement to loan to the City $41,304,818 for the construction of a new wastewater treatment facility.
No interest is charged on the loan. Loan was paid in full as of July 31, 2021. 2014 Wastewater Revenue Refunding Bonds: In November 2014, the City issued $6,470,000 in 2014 Wastewater Revenue Refunding Bonds (2014 bonds) with interest rates ranging from 5% to 5.25%. The proceeds were used to advance refund the 2004 Wastewater Revenue Refunding Bonds.
Net proceeds of $9.3 million (including a $1.4 million premium and other city funds) were deposited in an irrevocable trust with an escrow agent to provide funds for the future debt service payment on the refunded bonds. As a result, the 2004 Wastewater Revenue Refunding Bonds are considered defeased and the liability for those bonds has been removed. The reacquisition price totaled to the net carrying amount of the refunded bonds.
Interests on the 2014 bonds are payable semiannually on April 1 and October 1 each year, commenced April 1, 2015. Principal payments which are due each October 1 will commence on October 1, 2022, with the last payment due on October 1, 2026. The bonds are paid from and secured by the net revenues of the wastewater collection system of the City.
Accounting gains or losses resulting from advance refunding of long-term debt is deferred and amortized over the shorter of the life of the new debt or refunded debt. The deferred charge on refunding balance at June 30, 2022 was $39,492 for the Refunding Bonds.
The Bonds are general obligations of the City, payable solely by the City. The bond covenants contain events of default that require the revenue of the City to be applied by the Trustee as specified in the terms of the agreement if any of the following conditions occur: default on debt service payments; the failure of the City to observe or perform the conditions, covenants, or agreement terms of the debt; bankruptcy filing by the City; or if any court or competent jurisdiction shall assume custody or control of the City. No such events occurred during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022.
Annual debt service requirements, to maturity, for the 2014 Wastewater Revenue Refunding Bonds are as follows:
Fiscal year ended Principal Interest Total
2023 $1,520,000 $299,000 $1,819,000
2024 1,595,000 221,125 1,816,125
2025 1,675,000 139,375 1,814,375
2026 1,755,000 53,625 1,808,625
2027 195,000 4,875 199,875
Total $6,740,000 $718,000 $7,458,000
62 5.a
Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 5 – Long-Term Debt (Continued):
B. Business Type Activities Debt (Continued)
2017 Wastewater Revenue Bonds: In June 2017, the City issued $22,100,000 in 2017 Wastewater Revenue Refunding Bonds (2017 bonds) at an interest rate of 5%. The proceeds were used to fund the acquisition, construction, and installation of certain improvements to the Wastewater system.
Net proceeds of $26.2 million (including a $4 million premium and other city funds) were deposited in an irrevocable trust with an escrow agent to provide funds for the future debt service payment on the refunded bonds.
Interests on the 2017 bonds are payable semiannually on April 1 and October 1 each year, commenced October 1, 2017. Principal payments which are due each October 1 will commence on October 1, 2022, with the last payment due on October 1, 2042. The bonds are paid from and secured by the net revenues of the wastewater collection system of the City.
The Bonds are general obligations of the City, payable solely by the City. The bond covenants contain events of default that require the revenue of the City to be applied by the Trustee as specified in the terms of the agreement if any of the following conditions occur: default on debt service payments; the failure of the City to observe or perform the conditions, covenants, or agreement terms of the debt; bankruptcy filing by the City; or if any court or competent jurisdiction shall assume custody or control of the City. No such events occurred during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022.
Annual debt service requirements, to maturity, for the 2017 Wastewater Revenue Refunding Bonds are as follows:
Fiscal year ended Principal Interest Total
2023 $625,000 $1,045,975 $1,670,975
2024 655,000 1,013,975 1,668,975
2025 690,000 980,350 1,670,350
2026 725,000 944,975 1,669,975
2027 760,000 907,850 1,667,850
2028 - 2032 4,435,000 3,912,375 8,347,375
2033 - 2037 5,550,000 2,792,900 8,342,900
2038 - 2042 7,030,000 1,321,250 8,351,250
2043 1,630,000 40,750 1,670,750
Total $22,100,000 $12,960,400 $35,060,400
63 5.a
Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 6 – Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB):
A. Plan Description
The City participates in the CalPERS medical program, an agent multiple‐employer defined benefit retiree healthcare plan. Employees in the following bargaining groups who retire from the City and receive a CalPERS pension are eligible to receive City contributions towards the costs of their (OPEB) coverage:
• Department Directors
• Battalion Chiefs
• Firefighters
• Management Unit
• Police Officers
• Police Supervisors
• Police Management
• Wastewater Treatment Plant
• Miscellaneous Employees
In general, employees in the above groups may choose to receive their medical benefits from Union Trust Plans (except Public Safety – Firefighters and Police) or enroll in any of the CalPERS medical plans. For the retirees who do not participate in the CalPERS medical programs, the City does not make a contribution toward the cost of postemployment healthcare benefits. No assets are accumulated in a trust that meets the criteria in paragraph 4 of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statements No. 75.
B. Funding Policy
Under its arrangement with the CalPERS medical program, the City contributes the minimum amount provided under Government Code Section 22825 of the Public Employees Medical and Hospital Care Act. Retirees must contribute any premium amounts in excess of the City contribution.
Retired Department Directors, retired Management Unit employees, unrepresented managers, and confidential employees receive an additional $100 monthly benefit.
The City’s policy is to contribute an amount sufficient to pay the current year’s minimum employer contribution only.
Employees Covered
Membership in the plan consisted of the following at June 30, 2022:
Active employees 174
Inactive employees receiving benefit payments 61
Inactive employees entitled to but not yet
receiving benefit payments 98
Total 333
64 5.a
Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 6 – Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) (Continued):
C. Total OPEB Liability
Actuarial Methods and Assumptions: The City’s total OPEB liability was measured as of June 30, 2021 and was determined by an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2020 to determine the total OPEB liability as of June 30, 2021, based on the following actuarial methods and assumptions:
Actuarial Assumption June 30, 2021 Measurement Date
Actuarial Valuation Date June 30, 2020
Contribution Policy No pre-funding
Discount Rate *2.16% at June 30, 2021
*2.21% at June 30, 2020
General Inflation 2.75% per annum
Aggregate Payroll Increase 3.00% per annum
Mortality, Retirement, Disability, Termination CalPERS 1997-2015 Experience Study Mortality Improvement
Post-retirement mortality projected fully
generational with Scale MP-2020
Discount Rate: The discount rate used to measure the total OPEB liability was 2.21%.
D. Changes in Total OPEB Liability
The changes in the total OPEB Liability follows:
Total OPEB
Liability
Balance as of June 30, 2021:
(Measurement date 6/30/20) $8,431,567
Changes Recognized for the Measurement Period:
Service cost 524,816
Interest 195,445
Benefit changes -
Differences between expected and actual experience -
Changes of assumptions 72,300
Contributions from the employer -
Benefit payments (225,411)
Net changes 567,150
Balance as of June 30, 2022:
(Measurement date 6/30/21) $8,998,717
The General Fund is typically used to liquidate the liabilities for OPEB. 65 5.a
Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 6 – Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) (Continued):
E. Sensitivity of the Total OPEB Liability
The following presents the total OPEB liability of the City, as well as what the City's total OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1-percentage-point lower or 1- percentage-point higher than the current discount rate:
Total OPEB Liability/(Asset)
Discount Rate -1% Current Discount Rate Discount Rate +1% (1.16 %) (2.16%) (3.16%)
$10,650,159 $8,998,717 $7,704,218
The following presents the total OPEB liability of the City, as well as what the City's total OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using a healthcare cost trend rate that is 1-percentagepoint lower or 1-percentage-point higher than the current healthcare cost trend rate:
Total OPEB Liability/(Asset)
1% Decrease Current Healthcare Cost 1% Increase
Trend Rates
$7,572,794 $8,998,717 $10,872,262
F. OPEB Expenses and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to OPEB For the year ended June 30, 2022, the City recognized OPEB Expense of $340,318. As of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, the City reported deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to OPEB from the following sources:
Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows
of Resources of Resources
Employer contributions made
subsequent to the measurement date $216,706 *
Differences between actual and expected experience 182,716 $212,403 Changes of assumptions 1,110,093 290,782
Total $1,509,515 $503,185
* Include $135,446 cash benefit payments, $1,260 administrative costs, and $80,000 implied subsidy benefit payments
66 5.a
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 6 – Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) (Continued):
F. OPEB Expenses and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to OPEB (Continued)
The contributions made after the measurement date of the net OPEB liability but before the end of the City’s reporting period will be recognized as a reduction of the net OPEB liability in the subsequent fiscal year rather than in the current fiscal year. Therefore, $216,706 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the OPEB liability in the year ended June 30, 2022. Amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB will be recognized as future OPEB expense as follows:
Year Annual
Ended June 30 Amortization
2023 $23,190
2024 92,493
2025 176,642
2026 249,687
2027 213,553
Thereafter 34,059
Total $789,624
NOTE 7 – Pension Plans:
A. General Information about the Pension Plans
The City has pension plans with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) and the California Public Employees Retirement System (PARS). Information about the pension plans follows.
California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) Plan Descriptions – All qualified permanent and probationary employees are eligible to participate in the City’s defined benefit pension plans as follows:
• Miscellaneous (agent multiple-employer plan)
• Safety Police (cost-sharing multiple-employer plan)
• PEPRA Safety Police (cost-sharing multiple-employer plan) • Safety Fire (cost-sharing multiple-employer plan)
• PEPRA Safety Fire (cost-sharing multiple-employer plan) These plans are administered by the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), which acts as a common investment and administrative agent for its participating member employers. Benefit provisions under the Plans are established by State statute and City resolution. CalPERS issues publicly available reports that include a full description of the pension plans regarding benefit provisions, assumptions and membership information that can be found on the CalPERS website.
67 5.a
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 7 – Pension Plans (Continued):
A. General Information about the Pension Plans (Continued) At June 30, 2022, the City reported the following amounts related to the pension plans:
Miscellaneous Plan Safety Plan
Agent-Multiple Cost-Sharing PARS REP Total
Net pension liabilities $8,778,465 $24,515,482 $2,009,218 $35,303,165 Deferred outflows of resources 2,913,394 9,106,292 237,330 12,257,016 Deferred inflows of resources 9,756,934 17,779,469 27,536,403 Pension expenses 260,836 4,644,769 206,640 5,112,245
Employer Contributions 2,691,698 3,932,902 97,904 6,722,504 The General Fund is typically used to liquidate the liabilities for pensions.
B. Miscellaneous Plan
Benefits Provided – CalPERS provides service retirement and disability benefits, annual cost of living adjustments and death benefits to plan members, who must be public employees and beneficiaries. Benefits are based on years of credited service, equal to one year of full time employment. Members with five years of total service are eligible to retire at age 50 with statutorily reduced benefits. All members are eligible for non-duty disability benefits after 10 years of service. The death benefit is one of the following: the Basic Death Benefit, the 1957 Survivor Benefit, or the Optional Settlement 2W Death Benefit. The cost of living adjustments for each plan are applied as specified by the Public Employees’ Retirement Law.
The Plans’ provisions and benefits in effect at June 30, 2022, are summarized as follows:
Miscellaneous
Benefit formula 2.5% @ 55
2% @ 55
Benefit vesting schedule 5 years service
Benefit payments monthly for life
Retirement age 50
Monthly benefits, as a % of eligible compensation 2-2.5% Required employee contribution rates 7.74%
Required employer contribution rates 28.50%
The Following employees were covered by the benefit terms for the Plan as of the most recent actuarial valuation date of June 30, 2020 and measurement date of June 30, 2021.
Miscellaneous
Inactive employees or beneficiaries
currently receiving benefits 285
Inactive employees entitled to but not yet
receiving benefits 110
Active employees 113
Total 508
68 5.a
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 7 – Pension Plans (Continued):
B. Miscellaneous Plan (Continued)
Contributions – Section 20814(c) of the California Public Employees’ Retirement Law requires that the employer contribution rates for all public employers to be determined on an annual basis by the actuary and be effective on the July 1 following notice of a change in the rate.
Funding contributions for the Plan are determined annually on an actuarial basis as of June 30 by CalPERS. The actuarially determined rate is the estimated amount necessary to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. The City is required to contribute the difference between the actuarially determined rate and the contribution rate of employees. Employer contribution rates may change if plan contracts are amended. Payments made by the employer to satisfy contribution requirements that are identified by the pension plan terms as plan member contribution requirements are classified as plan member contributions.
Net Pension Liability – The City’s net pension liability for the Miscellaneous Plan is measured as the total pension liability, less the pension plan’s fiduciary net position. The net pension liability of the Plan is measured as of June 30, 2021, using an annual actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2020 rolled forward to June 30, 2021 using standard update procedures. A summary of principal assumptions and methods used to determine the net pension liability is shown below.
Changes in the Net Pension Liability – The changes in the Net Pension Liability for the Miscellaneous Plan are as follows:
Increase (Decrease)
Total Pension
Liability
Plan Fiduciary
Net Position
Net Pension
Liability/(Asset)
Balance at June 30, 2020 Measurement Date $109,247,895 $86,962,550 $22,285,345 Changes in the year:
Service cost 1,748,773 1,748,773
Interest on the total pension liability 7,659,792 7,659,792 Changes of Benefit Terms
Changes of assumptions
Difference between expected and actual experience (230,958) (230,958) Net plan to plan resource movement
Contributions - employer 2,515,162 (2,515,162)
Contributions - employees 782,756 (782,756)
Net investment income 19,473,439 (19,473,439)
Benefit payments, including refunds of employee
contributions (5,522,755) (5,522,755)
Administrative expense (86,870) 86,870
Other miscellaneous income/(expense)
Net changes 3,654,852 17,161,732 (13,506,880)
Balance at June 30, 2021 Measurement Date $112,902,747 $104,124,282 $8,778,465 69 5.a
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Pacifica 2022 ACFR FY 2022 [Revision 1] (5254 : ACFR - FY 2021-22)
CITY OF PACIFICA
NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
NOTE 7 – Pension Plans (Continued):
B. Miscellaneous Plan (Continued)
Sensitivity of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate – The following presents the net pension liability of the City for the Miscellaneous Plan, calculated using the discount rate, as well as what the City’s net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is one percentage point lower or 1 percentage point higher than the current rate:
Miscellaneous
1% Decrease 6.15%
Net Pension Liability $23,117,738
Current Discount Rate 7.15%
Net Pension Liability $8,778,465
1% Increase 8.15%
Net Pension Liability $3,100,984
Pension Expenses and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions – For the year ended June 30, 2022, the City recognized pension expense of $260,836. At June 30, 2022, the City reported deferred outflows of resources related to pensions for the Plan from the following sources:
Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows
of Resources of Resources
Pension contributions subsequent to measurement date $2,691,698 Differences between actual and expected experience 221,696 ($125,977) Changes in assumptions
Net differences between projected and actual earnings on plan investments (9,630,957)
Total $2,913,394 ($9,756,934)
Miscellaneous
The contributions made after the measurement date of the net pension liability but before the end of the City’s reporting period will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the subsequent fiscal year rather than in the current fiscal year. Therefore, $2,691,698 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended June 30, 2023.