OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
- 1 - OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
This Agreement for Consultant Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this _____________ day of _______________, ___, by and between THE CITY OF PACIFICA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and Dyett & Bhatia Urban and Regional Planners, a California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"). CITY and CONSULTANT may be referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”
RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY requires environmental review and related services in connection with the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update;
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified to perform such services; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has agreed to provide CITY with such services on the terms and conditions set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, for the considerations hereinafter set forth, CONSULTANT and CITY agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1 - SCOPE OF SERVICES
1.1. Scope of Work. CONSULTANT agrees to furnish the services set forth in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Services").
1.2. Compliance with Law. The Services shall be performed in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and orders.
1.3. Time is of the Essence. CONSULTANT agrees to diligently prosecute the Services. In the performance of this Agreement, time is of the essence.
1.4. Professional Competence. CONSULTANT represents that it has the professional skills necessary to perform the Services and that it will perform the Services in a skillful and professional manner. CONSULTANT represents that it has all the necessary licenses to perform the Services and shall maintain them throughout the term of this Agreement.
CONSULTANT agrees that the Services shall be performed in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which CONSULTANT is engaged, in the same or similar geographical area in which CONSULTANT practices its profession, and will prepare all work products required by this Agreement in accordance with such standards. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT is in responsible charge of the Services and CITY shall have no control over the method or means of performance of the Services. Acceptance by CITY of the Services does not operate as a release of CONSULTANT from professional responsibility for the Services performed.
OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
- 2 - OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
1.5. Independent Contractor. CONSULTANT is an independent contractor and not an employee of CITY. CONSULTANT expressly warrants that it will not represent that it is an employee of CITY. Persons employed or utilized by CONSULTANT in the performance of the Services will not be employees or agents of CITY. CONSULTANT is solely responsible for the payment of employment taxes incurred under this Agreement and any similar federal or state taxes.
1.6. Confidentiality. CONSULTANT agrees to maintain in confidence and not disclose to any person, firm, governmental entity, or corporation, without CITY's prior written consent, any trade secret or confidential information, knowledge or data relating to the products, process, or operation of CITY. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain in confidence and not to disclose to any person, firm, governmental entity, or corporation any data, information, technology, or material developed or obtained by CONSULTANT during the performance of the Services. The covenants contained in this Section 1.6 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for whatever cause.
1.7. Ownership of Material. Any reports and other material prepared by or on behalf of CONSULTANT under this Agreement (collectively, the "Documents") shall be and remain the property of CITY. All Documents not already provided to CITY shall be delivered to CITY on the date of termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Documents may be used by CITY and its agents, employees, representatives, and assigns, in whole or in part, or in modified form, for all purposes CITY may deem appropriate without further employment of or payment of any compensation to CONSULTANT.
1.8. Documentation. CONSULTANT shall keep and maintain full and complete documentation and accounting records, employee time sheets, and correspondence pertaining to the performance of the Services, and CONSULTANT shall make such documents available for review and/or audit by CITY and CITY's representatives at all reasonable times for at least four years after the termination of this Agreement or completion of the Services.
1.9. Testimony. CONSULTANT agrees to testify at CITY's request if litigation is brought against CITY in connection with the Services. Unless the action is brought by CONSULTANT or is based upon CONSULTANT's negligence, CITY will compensate CONSULTANT for the preparation and the testimony at CONSULTANT's standard hourly rates.
ARTICLE 2 - COMPENSATION
2.1. Compensation. Compensation for the Services shall be in accordance with Exhibit B, Compensation, attached hereto and incorporated herein. It is agreed that the compensation for the Services shall not exceed $218,203.00, comprised of a $198,366.00 base cost plus 10 percent contingency ("Cost Ceiling").
2.2. Invoices. CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices in a form satisfactory to CITY on or before the tenth day of each month for Services provided during the preceding month. CONSULTANT shall submit time and cost records as necessary to substantiate OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
- 3 - OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
performance of the Services. Within 35 days after receipt of each such invoice, CITY shall verify the accuracy of the invoice, correct the charges where appropriate and as discussed and mutually agreed with CONSULTANT, and make payment to CONSULTANT in an amount equal to the amount of such invoice, as verified or corrected by CITY. No payment hereunder shall be construed as evidence of acceptance of any of CONSULTANT's work. CITY reserves the right to withhold payment from CONSULTANT on account of Services not performed satisfactorily, delays in CONSULTANT's performance of Services, or other defaults hereunder. CONSULTANT shall not stop or delay performance of the Services under this Agreement on account of payment disputes with CITY.
2.3. Status Reports. Together with each monthly invoice, CONSULTANT shall submit a status report detailing the amount expended on the Services to that date and the remaining amount to be expended before the Cost Ceiling is reached. CONSULTANT shall notify CITY in writing when payments have reached 90 percent of the Cost Ceiling.
2.4. Withholding. In lieu of holding retention, CITY shall withhold CONSULTANT's final payment until the Services are complete and CITY has received all Documents.
CONSULTANT shall diligently continue and complete performance of the Services if the Services are not complete at the time CONSULTANT has performed services up to the Cost Ceiling.
ARTICLE 3 - TIME OF PERFORMANCE
3.1. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective upon execution of the second signature and shall remain in full force and effect until the Services are completed (the "Term"). CONSULTANT agrees to complete all services by June 30, 2024.
3.2. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by CITY upon written notice to CONSULTANT.
3.3. Final Payment. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to compensation for Services performed up to the time of such termination, it being understood that any payments are full compensation for the Services rendered under this Agreement.
3.4. Other Remedies. Nothing in this Article 3 shall be deemed to limit the respective rights of the parties to terminate this Agreement for cause or otherwise to exercise any rights or pursue any remedies which may accrue to them.
ARTICLE 4 - DESIGNATED CONTACTS
4.1. CITY Contact. CITY designates Christian Murdock, its Director of Planning, as its contact who shall be responsible for administering and interpreting the terms and conditions of this Agreement, for matters relating to CONSULTANT's performance under this Agreement, and for liaison and coordination between CITY and CONSULTANT. In the event CITY wishes to make a change in CITY's representative, CITY will notify CONSULTANT of the change in writing.
OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
- 4 - OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
4.2. CONSULTANT Contact. CONSULTANT designates Rajeev Bhatia as its contact, who shall have immediate responsibility for the performance of the Services and for all matters relating to performance under this Agreement. Any change in CONSULTANT's designated contact shall be subject to written approval by CITY.
ARTICLE 5 - INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
5.1. Indemnification. CONSULTANT shall, to the fullest extent allowed by law, with respect to claims, liability, loss, damage, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney's and expert witness fees, awards, fines, penalties, or judgments, arising out of or relating to CONSULTANT’s negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct in the performance of the Services (collectively "Claims"), defend, indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its Officials, officers, employees and agents (the "CITY Parties"), except to the extent the Claims are attributable to CITY Parties' gross negligence or willful misconduct. CONSULTANT shall defend the CITY Parties as required by California Civil Code Section 2778, and with counsel reasonably acceptable to those parties.
CONSULTANT shall have no right to seek reimbursement from the CITY Parties for the costs of defense.
The obligations contained in this Section 5.1 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for whatever cause for the full period of time allowed by law and shall not in any way be limited by the insurance requirements of this Agreement.
5.2. Health and Safety. CONSULTANT may perform part of the Services at sites which contain unknown working conditions and contaminated materials. CONSULTANT shall be solely responsible for the health and safety of CONSULTANT's employees during the performance of the Services.
5.3. Insurance. CONSULTANT and all of CONSULTANTS employees, subcontractors, consultants and other agency shall procure, provide and maintain at all times during the performance of this Agreement, and for such additional periods as described herein, the insurance listed below with insurers licensed to do business in the State of California and with a Best's rating of no less than A:VII.
A. Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance. Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance providing bodily injury liability and property damage, to protect against all liability arising out of the use of any owned, leased, passenger or commercial automobile at a minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit and $2,000,000 aggregate. Coverage shall apply to hired and non-owned autos.
B. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Commercial General Liability Insurance, with limits providing a minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage for each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate and $2,000,000 products/completed operations aggregate. The insurance shall cover all operations including but not limited to the following: (1) premises, operations and mobile equipment liability; (2) completed operations and products liability; (3) contractual liability insuring the obligations assumed by CONSULTANT in OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
- 5 - OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
this Agreement; (4) broad form property damage liability; (5) personal injury liability endorsement, including death; and (6) automobile bodily injury and property damage insurance, including all owned, hired and non-owned equipment.
C. Professional Liability Insurance. Professional Liability Insurance protecting against liabilities arising out of or in connection with negligent acts, errors, or omissions of CONSULTANT and all of CONSULTANTS employees, subcontractors, consultants and other agency in connection with this Agreement, at a minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage and $1,000,000 aggregate, on a "claims made basis" with a continuation of coverage extension for liabilities for two years from the date the Services are substantially complete. Such professional liability policies shall include coverage for liability assumed by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement.
D. Workers Compensation Insurance. Workers Compensation insurance, occupational disease insurance and employer’s liability insurance shall be required with minimum limits as required by law, covering all workplaces involved in this Agreement.
E. Policy Terms. Concurrently with execution of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide CITY with Certificates of Insurance evidencing that CONSULTANT has obtained or maintains the insurance required by this Section
5.3. The Certificates shall be on forms acceptable to CITY. CONSULTANT shall also furnish CITY with original endorsements with the following documentation:
• Precluding cancellation or reduction in coverage before the expiration of thirty (30) days after CITY shall have received written notification thereof from CONSULTANT by United States mail;
• Providing that CONSULTANT's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, and include a “separation of insureds” or “severability” clause which treats each insured separately, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability (cross-liability endorsement);
• Excepting CONSULTANT’S professional liability insurance, naming CITY, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds (“Additional Insureds”); and • Providing that for any claims relating to CONSULTANT's services hereunder, CONSULTANT's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to CITY, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents, and that any insurance or self-insurance maintained by CITY for itself, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents shall be in excess of CONSULTANT's insurance and shall not be contributory with it.
• It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverages requirements and/or limits shall be available to the Additional Insured, including but not limited to any umbrella or excess insurance.
OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
- 6 - OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be the greater of:
(a) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (b) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured.
F. Material Breach. If CONSULTANT fails to maintain insurance coverage or provided insurance documentation which is required pursuant to this Agreement, it shall be deemed a material breach of this Agreement. CITY, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement and obtain damages from CONSULTANT resulting from said breach. Alternatively, CITY may purchase the required insurance coverage, and without further notice to CONSULTANT, may deduct from sums due to CONSULTANT any premium costs advanced by CITY for such insurance. These remedies shall be in addition to any other remedies available to CITY.
ARTICLE 6 - NOTICES
All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing, and shall be personally delivered or sent by facsimile or reputable overnight courier and shall be deemed received upon the earlier of: (1) if personally delivered, the date of delivery to the address of the person to receive such notice; (2) if delivered by Federal Express or other overnight courier for next business day delivery, the next business day; (3) if sent by facsimile, with the original sent on the same day by overnight courier, the date on which the facsimile is received, provided it is before 5:00 P.M. Pacific Time; or (4) if sent electronically, the date of delivery on the confirmed read receipt. Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner described in this Article 6. Rejection or other refusal to accept or the inability to deliver because of a change in address of which no notice was given shall be deemed to constitute receipt of the notice or communication sent. Unless changed in accordance herewith, the addresses for notices given pursuant to this Agreement shall be as follows:
If to CITY: City Manager
170 Santa Maria Avenue
Pacifica, CA 94044
Phone: (650) 738-7409
Facsimile: (650) 359-6038
Email: [email protected]
If to CONSULTANT: Rajeev Bhatia
Dyett & Bhatia
4001 Howe Street
Oakland, CA 94611
Phone: (415) 956-4300
Email: [email protected]
ARTICLE 7 - MISCELLANEOUS
OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
- 7 - OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
7.1. Conflict of Interest Prohibition. CITY and CONSULTANT will comply with the requirements of the CITY’s Conflict of Interest Code adopted pursuant to California Government Code §87300 et seq., the Political Reform Act (California Government Code §81000 et seq.), the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission (Title 2, §18110 et seq. of the California Code of Regulations), California Government Code §1090 et seq., and any other ethics laws applicable to the performance of the Services and/or this Agreement. CONSULTANT may be required to file with the CITY Clerk a completed Form 700 before commencing performance of the Services unless the CITY Clerk determines that completion of a Form 700 is not required, pursuant to CITY’s Conflict of Interest Code. Form 700 forms are available from the CITY Clerk.
CONSULTANT may not perform Services for any other person or entity that, pursuant to any applicable law or regulation, would result in a conflict of interest or would otherwise be prohibited with respect to CONSULTANT’s obligations pursuant to this Agreement.
CONSULTANT agrees to cooperate fully with CITY and to provide any necessary and appropriate information requested by CITY or any authorized representative concerning potential conflicts of interest or prohibitions concerning CONSULTANT’s obligations pursuant to this Agreement.
CONSULTANT may not employ any CITY official, officer or employee in the performance of the Services, nor may any official, officer or employee of CITY have any financial interest in this Agreement that would violate California Government Code §1090 et seq. CONSULTANT hereby warrants that it is not now, nor has it been in the previous twelve (12) months, an employee, agent, appointee, or official of CITY. If CONSULTANT was an employee, agent, appointee, or official of CITY in the previous twelve months, CONSULTANT warrants that it did not participate in any manner in the forming of this Agreement. CONSULTANT understands that, if this Agreement is made in violation of Government Code §1090 et seq., the entire Agreement is void and CONSULTANT will not be entitled to any compensation for CONSULTANT’s performance of the Services, including reimbursement of expenses, and CONSULTANT will be required to reimburse CITY for any sums paid to CONSULTANT under this Agreement. CONSULTANT understands that, in addition to the foregoing, penalties for violating Government Code §1090 may include criminal prosecution and disqualification from holding public office in the State of California.
Any violation by CONSULTANT of the requirements of this provision will constitute a material breach of this Agreement, and the CITY reserves all its rights and remedies at law and equity concerning any such violations.
7.2. Subcontracting. CONSULTANT may subcontract portions of the Services upon the prior written approval of CITY. CONSULTANT will be solely responsible for payment of such subcontract Services. No contractual relationship will exist between any such subcontractors of CONSULTANT and CITY. CONSULTANT’s subcontractors agree to be bound to CONSULTANT and CITY in the same manner and to the same extent as CONSULTANT is bound to CITY under the Agreement. CONSULTANT’s subcontractors further agree to include the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, with any sub- OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
- 8 - OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
subcontractor to the extent they apply to the scope of the sub-subcontractor’s work. A copy of the CITY indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to CONSULTANT’s subcontractors upon request.
7.3. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of CITY and CONSULTANT as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters covered hereunder. This Agreement may only be modified by an amendment in writing signed by each party.
7.4. No Assignment. The Services are deemed unique and neither party shall assign, transfer, subcontract or otherwise substitute its interest in this Agreement or any of its obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other party. As limited by this Section
7.2, this Agreement is to be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
7.5. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is determined to be unconstitutional, invalid or beyond the authority of either party, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect, provided that the remainder of this Agreement can be interpreted to give effect to the intentions of the parties.
7.6. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts and, when fully signed, such counterparts shall have the same effect as if signed in one document.
7.7. Choice of Law. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California without reference to its choice of laws principles and venue shall be in the appropriate court in San Mateo County, California.
7.8. Waiver. No failure on the part of either Party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder. A waiver by either CITY or CONSULTANT of any breach of this Agreement shall not be binding upon the waiving party unless such waiver is in writing. In the event of a written waiver, such a waiver shall not affect the waiving party's rights with respect to any other further breach.
7.9. Mediation. In the event the parties are unable to resolve a dispute arising under this Agreement through good faith negotiations, the parties agree to submit the matter to mediation with a mutually agreeable mediator. Prior to the mediation, the parties shall exchange any documents reasonably necessary to resolve the matter to be mediated.
7.10. Interpretation. In the event this Agreement is ever construed in any dispute between the parties, it and each of its provisions shall be construed without regard to the party or parties responsible for its preparation and shall be deemed to have been prepared jointly by the parties. The rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in interpreting this Agreement.
OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
- 9 - OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
7.11. Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of one of the parties represents that he or she is duly authorized to sign and deliver the Agreement on behalf of such party and that this Agreement is binding on such party in accordance with its terms.
7.12. Third Parties. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with, or cause of action in favor of, a third party against either the CITY or CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT’s Services hereunder are being performed solely for the benefit of CITY. CITY shall be an express third-party beneficiary of all contracts between CONSULTANT and any subcontractors or subconsultants in connection with any services performed in connection with, or in furtherance of, this Agreement. * * *
[Signatures on following page]
OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
- 10 - OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth above.
CITY OF PACIFICA
By: Date:
Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager
CONSULTANT
By: Date:
Rajeev Bhatia, President, Dyett & Bhatia
By: Date:
Attest
By:
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
Approved As To Form
By:
Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney
OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
Attachment A: Scope of Work
This attachment outlines our proposed work program for all phases of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Housing Element Rezoning Project. Work products are outlined at the end of each task, and are also summarized on the Timeline table on page 11.
The task-by-task descriptions that follow represent our approach to data collection, analysis of impacts, and preparation of the EIR document. Initials in parentheses following the sub-section heading identify the lead firm for each sub-task.
• D&B: Dyett & Bhatia
• DKS: DKS Associates, Transportation Planners
• WRA: WRA, Inc., Biological Resources Consultants
• GC: Geocon Consultants, Inc., Geotechnical Consultants • CSA: Charles M Salter Associates Inc., Noise Consultants TASK 1: PROJECT INITIATION
1-A: Kick-Off Meeting with City Staff (Team). The consultant team will meet with City staff to discuss EIR approach. Roles and responsibilities will be clarified, communication protocols will be established, sites for more detailed geotechnical and biological analysis will be discussed, and a detailed work schedule will be developed. City staff will also provide the consultant with background information including an overview of proposed zoning changes and any potential foreseeable impacts and will work with the team to confirm the project horizon year. Because many impacts—such as transportation, noise, air quality and greenhouse gases—will be cumulative in nature, the horizon year will need to be established early in the process. 1-B: Review Background Materials (Team). The consultants will review pertinent documents, provided by City staff or otherwise available. This will include the 2040 General Plan and EIR (which we are already familiar with), the Zoning Code, utility master plans, urban water management plan, and any other relevant documentation.
1-C: Sites Mapping (D&B). The City will provide a shapefile of rezoned Housing Element sites or provide APNs for D&B to create shapefiles to be used for any additional maps that may need to be created for the EIR. D&B will use the basemap and other maps used previously in preparation of the 2040 General Plan EIR.
Meetings Products
• Kick-off Meeting with City Staff • N/A
TASK 2: SCOPING
2-A: Notice of Preparation (Staff, D&B). D&B will prepare and staff will circulate the Notice of Preparation (NOP) of the EIR for the Housing Element Rezoning effort ("Proposed Project").
Because it has already been determined that an EIR will be needed, an Initial Study need not be conducted. It is anticipated that Agricultural and Forest Resources, Cultural and Historic Resources, and Mineral Resources, and possibly Hazardous Materials, may be able to be scoped out; this will be noted in the NOP with brief rationale for scoping out these topics provided. D&B will review comments received on the NOP and ensure that comments are addressed in the EIR. 2-B: Tribal Consultation (Staff, D&B). Pursuant to SB 18 and AB 52, D&B will assist the City with tribal consultation, notifying the NAHC of the planning process and contacting tribal representatives in the planning area.
2-C: Scoping Meeting (Staff, D&B). Staff will coordinate a scoping meeting, including sending out meeting notices and reserving a conference room at the City, unless the City prefers that this meeting be conducted on Zoom. D&B will facilitate the meeting and take notes on comments made by those attending. A summary record of comments will be created using these notes and D&B will determine how to address these comments in the EIR.
Meetings Products
• Scoping Meeting (Staff, D&B) • Notice of Preparation
• Tribal Consultation Letters
TASK 3: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ALTERNATIVES
3-A: Project Description and Alternatives (Staff). Staff will prepare a concise EIR-level project description. This will include proposed new zones, and density and height changes. Staff will also provide direction on up to two land use alternatives (including the No Project Alternative) for inclusion in the EIR. Our budget allocates ~17 hours for consultant support to staff for alternatives development. The project description will contain the project proposal, purpose and objectives, anticipated buildout, a discussion of potential areas of controversy, and issues to be resolved.
3-B: Project Description and Alternatives Review (D&B). D&B will edit and refine the project description and description of alternatives for inclusion in the EIR.
Meetings Products
• Scoping Meeting (Staff, D&B) • Project Description and Alternatives (Staff) TASK 4: ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT EIR (ADEIR) PREPARATION
The ADEIR will evaluate the Project and up to two alternatives (including a No Project alternative). At key points during the process, D&B will provide feedback to staff regarding environmental impacts. The ADEIR will include:
• Executive Summary;
• Project Description;
• Environmental Impact Analysis, including environmental setting; • Comparative Assessment of Alternatives; and
• CEQA-Required Conclusions.
4-A: Executive Summary (D&B). The Executive Summary will explain the purpose and scope of the EIR, EIR organization, study approach, project background, environmentally superior alternative and summary of impacts and mitigation.
4-B: Project Description (D&B). The Project Description will be the project proposal, purpose and objectives, anticipated buildout resulting from the Proposed Project and changes resulting from previously approved plans, a discussion of potential areas of controversy, and issues to be resolved developed in Task 3.
4-C: Environmental Setting (Team). The Environmental Setting will provide a general description of existing conditions and geography of sites to be rezoned, suitable to support a programmatic-level EIR analysis. For citywide setting, D&B will incorporate the General Plan EIR by reference, and add supplemental information for the rezoned sites. This section will incorporate the most up-todate literature, maps, databases, and other resources, including site reconnaissance findings from WRA on biological resources and GC on geotechnical hazards. The setting will also clearly document the City’s existing policy and regulatory framework and that of other agencies to permit careful analysis of potential for mitigation associated with existing codes and policies. 4-D: Environmental Impact Analysis. D&B and team will build upon our extensive experience preparing general plan and general plan EIRs, particularly for Pacifica's 2040 General Plan Update.
The analysis will consider general impacts associated with buildout as part of the Proposed Project, as well as cumulative effects of General Plan buildout plus the Proposed Project to the established horizon year. Where possible, impacts will be quantified, and their level of significance established. If existing data does not allow definitive quantification, reasonable assumptions will be used to qualitatively approximate potential impacts. The impact analysis will be comprehensive in scope, covering all CEQA requirements. Significance criteria will be identified for each impact topic, largely based upon thresholds of significance established in the 2040 General Plan EIR. Impact analysis will account for the potential mitigating effect of existing City plans and policies. Issues to be addressed are expected to include:
• Aesthetics (D&B). Key visual and open space resources in and around the City include scenic open natural lands around the City’s perimeter such as the panoramic coastline and ocean views, lateral ridges of the Coast Range, San Pedro Mountain, and scenic highway-eligible roadways Highway 1 and Sharp Park Road.
Analysis will draw upon resource evaluation in the General Plan EIR and evaluate site zoning changes, such as height increases or increased density, for potential impacts, including potential loss or obstruction of identified scenic qualities. Visual modeling is not assumed as part of this analysis; impacts to these resources will be rated objectively using approaches and methodologies accepted by the City in the General Plan EIR to permit the community and decision-makers to ascertain the impacts of zoning changes and consider the tradeoffs associated with impacts to such resources with attaining other City and Housing Element objectives.
• Air Quality (D&B). Operational air quality impacts associated with cumulative buildout (from the Proposed Project, and plus the cumulative assumed buildout as part of the General Plan to the horizon year) will be evaluated by determining whether it is consistent with the most recently adopted Air Quality Plan prepared by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD,) as well as with their recommended analysis thresholds. Construction-related emissions associated with the Proposed Project will be evaluated qualitatively based on guidance provided by the BAAQMD and will also include the identification of constructionrelated mitigation measures recommended by the BAAQMD. D&B will qualitatively evaluate potential health risks associated the General Plan Update, which includes an evaluation of exposure of new sensitive receptors proposed as part of sites rezoning to existing or planned sources of toxic air contaminants (TACs) and PM2.5.
• Energy, Greenhouse Gas and Climate Change (D&B). D&B will prepare a GHG analysis to address the potential net increase of GHG emissions during construction and operation activities associated with additional buildout resulting from the Proposed Project, and cumulative impacts of the Proposed Project plus assumed General Plan buildout. This section will refer to and update the General Plan overview of the current regulatory framework regarding GHGs/climate change, including but not limited to the California’s Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32), Senate Bill (SB) 97, SB 375, SB 32, Executive Order B-55-18, the CEQA Guidelines, and any policies or measures contained in the City's Climate Action Plan (CAP).
The analysis will quantify carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) units associated with construction and operational emissions attributable to the net change of housing units that may be associated with the proposed project. Emission factors and methodologies will use the most recent versions of CARB’s Orion 2018 database, the latest version of EMFAC2017 air pollutant emissions database to calculate GHG emissions utilizing VMT data, as described more fully under the air quality analysis above, and the CalEEMod emissions model (for nontransportation related emissions). This analysis will utilize the established General Plan EIR thresholds; if any significant impacts are determined by our analysis, we will prepare appropriate mitigation measures to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. • Biological Resources (WRA). The City’s planning area includes critical habitat for steelhead and the California red legged frog, and the presence of several other special status species has been documented. While most rezoning sites are previously developed. there are a few vacant sites where special status species could be present. As a part of the Environmental Setting portion of the EIR Biological Resources section, WRA will summarize special-status wildlife and plant species known to occur within and in the immediate vicinity of undeveloped or partially undeveloped sites including plants and animals listed, proposed for listing, or candidates for listing as threatened or endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) or the California Endangered Species Act (CESA); animals listed as “fully protected” under the California Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Code; animals designated as “Species of Special Concern” by the CDFW; and plants listed as rare or endangered by the California Native Plant Society (CNPS). This listing will be based on current secondary sources, including but not limited to, the California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB), CDFW lists, United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) databases, CNPS lists, and other applicable secondary sources.
A table which lists all potentially occurring special-status species in the vicinity will be provided in the SEIR section.
WRA will also review special habitats, including critical habitat and sensitive biological communities known to occur in the general vicinity. Following the review of existing biological and regulatory information, WRA will conduct a reconnaissance field survey of the focus sites. The field survey will assess the existing biological resources and identify, confirm, and augment any potentially sensitive biological issues. Generalized mapping of the biological resources for each site will be provided; however, this Scope of Work does not include any wetland delineations or specific species surveys.
• Geologic Hazards (D&B, GC). Drawing from General Plan EIR analysis of known geologic hazards, GC will provide geotechnical feasibility review of up to eight (8) sites to identify potential geotechnical impacts to planned redevelopment, with particular focus on seismic hazards and landslides. GC will develop a memo that presents professional opinions on geotechnical feasibility of redevelopment and discussion of potential geotechnical site constraints, and describe impacts of rezoned sites with potential to be exposed to these geotechnical hazards. We propose to perform an EIR-level geotechnical feasibility review of each site to identify potential geotechnical impacts to planned redevelopment, with particular focus on seismic hazards. D&B will incorporate these findings into the Geologic Hazards section. Should mitigation measures be needed, they will focus on appropriate methods to reduce the risk from these hazards and outline any further studies that would be needed for specific sites prior to development approval. These inputs will be presented in a memo format; D&B will use these inputs to develop this EIR section. • Hazards and Hazardous Materials (D&B). The EIR will evaluate the potential for rezoned sites to be exposed to contaminant releases and airport compatibility. This will include an updated search on GeoTracker, a statewide geographic information system that tracks soil, vapor, and groundwater of leaking underground storage tank (LUST) cases and non-UST cleanup sites, including Site Cleanup Program Sites (formerly referred to as Spills-Leaks-InvestigationsCleanups (SLIC) sites), Military Sites (formerly referred to as Department of Defense sites (DOD)), and Land Disposal (Land Fill) Sites. The analysis will assess the impact of these hazards on future site development/redevelopment.
• Hydrology and Water Quality (D&B). The City of Pacific is located within all or part of nine watersheds, and flood hazards exist among most of the creeks. Broad flood inundation is relatively common in several low-lying areas, including the Sharp Park area along Sanchez Creek and in the Linda Mar neighborhood along San Pedro Creek (also an area within the 100- year flood plain, as designated by FEMA). D&B will utilize existing information within the General Plan EIR and other information such as the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (with any available updates) to describe watershed conditions, drainage patterns, flood hazards and water quality issues with input from City staff. Staff will also qualitatively evaluate potential hydrologic and water quality impacts associated with future rezoning development including increases in peak discharges, flooding, the adequacy of drainage infrastructure, and adverse effects on water quality. Programmatic mitigation measures will be identified for hydrologic-surface runoff impacts. Mitigation may include avoidance of certain critical drainage areas, design/management practices, drainage facility improvements, and implementation of water quality best management practices. • Land Use and Planning (D&B). This section of the EIR will describe potential physical and policy conflicts related to proposed land use in the planning area. The EIR will evaluate the consistency of proposed rezoning with other potential applicable policies, such as the Coastal Act.
• Population and Housing (D&B). D&B will evaluate the effect of the rezoned site development/redevelopment on dividing an established community and any potential displacement effects. D&B will include the discussion of growth inducing impacts of the project under a separate chapter which discusses all CEQA required conclusions required under CEQA Guidelines §15126.
• Noise (CSA, D&B). Building upon work conducted for the General Plan EIR, CSA will update future noise contours based on new traffic data associated with potential site rezoning buildout. CSA will review updated traffic volume data from the engineer per the rezoning update; calculate traffic noise levels based on future traffic volumes, speeds, and truck percentages for each roadway segment to be included in the model; and provide the results of our traffic noise analysis in electronic spreadsheet format. The EIR will also evaluate mitigation strategies for potential future development and existing sensitive receptors that may be impacted by future development. Mitigation requirements will be identified, and potential development standards suggested, if necessary. • Public Utilities, Facilities and Services (D&B). Our team will review existing available information to identify existing capacity and constraints for public utilities, services and infrastructure, including schools, parks and recreation, water, wastewater, solid waste service, utilities, fire safety and emergency response, and police services. Using this information and projected demand, we will evaluate potential impacts associated with increased potential buildout as part of the rezoning buildout program and cumulative General Plan buildout until the horizon year, as well as any increased associated demand for public utilities, services and infrastructure. Analysis will utilize existing General Plan EIR thresholds. • Transportation and Traffic (DKS). Update of transportation modeling includes the following three subtasks:
A. Revised Future Land Use Inputs
DKS will develop revised year 2040 land use inputs for the C\CAG travel demand model that reflect the proposed rezoning. DKS will work with Dyett & Bhatia to calculate the expected increase in housing units by each Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) in the Pacifica planning area. The revised land use inputs will be reviewed by Dyett & Bhatia and accepted by the City of Pacifica before further work is conducted.
B. VMT Impact Assessment
DKS previously calculated VMT metrics associated with the preferred future alternative for the Pacifica General Plan Update. The metrics previously calculated include home-based VMT per capita, and home-based work VMT per employee summarized at local, county, and regional geographies. Under this task, DKS will repeat these calculations using the revised land use inputs developed under Task 1.
Because the Housing Element has a planning horizon of 2031 and the C\CAG model’s horizon year is 2040, VMT metrics may be interpolated between existing conditions and the 2040 results to estimate circa year 2030 VMT metrics, should the City decide upon that year as the horizon. Should the horizon year remain at 2040, as in the General Plan EIR, increase in housing from the rezoning program will be layered on top of development already included in the General Plan EIR analysis. This calculation ma need to be repeated for the “no project” alternative should the horizon year differ from that used in the General Plan EIR.
C. Updated General Plan Study Intersections and Roadway Segments DKS will update the study intersection and roadway level of service calculations previously prepared for the General Plan Update. These analyses involve eight general plan study intersections and 15 roadway segments. The analyses will rely on the revised year 2040 model outputs and utilize a growth increment approach. Results will be compared to those of the general plan preferred alternative to identify any impacts.
Note that DKS does not propose to collect new traffic volume data from which to calculate future year volumes for this task. DKS also does not propose updating any signalized intersection timing plans for the analysis. The focus of the analysis would be changes to results obtained for the general plan.
• Wildfire (D&B). While none of the sites currently proposed for rezoning are within a very high fire hazard severity zone, a few near Pacifica's southern border are in proximity to state responsibility areas with this designation. D&B will build upon analysis in the General Plan EIR to analyze CEQA requirements for wildfire.
• Alternatives (Team). Our team will analyze up to two alternatives (including the No Project Alternative) that are capable of substantially reducing or eliminating project impacts while also attaining the key policy and planning objectives identified in the draft General Plan.
Although the analysis of alternatives will be less detailed than that for the project, sufficient analysis will be provided on the magnitude of each impact to understand the consequences and tradeoffs associated with each policy approach.
D&B will provide a qualitative analysis of traffic impacts for the alternatives. The No Project alternative would assume a future growth pattern and transportation improvements based on the current General Plan, and would include regional growth and transportation improvements outside of the City.
4-E: Other Required CEQA Sections (D&B). In addition to project impacts analysis and assessment of alternatives, we will address all standard required CEQA Sections as follows:
• Significant and Unavoidable Impacts. We will describe those significant impacts that, despite feasible mitigation, cannot be reduced to a level of insignificance. We are familiar with different approaches to such impacts, their relationship to a potential statement of overriding considerations and findings, and that long-range planning efforts often require balancing such impacts with other social and economic benefits of the project. • Significant, Irreversible Environmental Changes. As required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15126, the EIR will present information on the extent to which the project would result in an irreversible commitment of environmental resources. Based on our recent general plan EIR experience, such findings have become more relevant for general plans when considering non-renewable energy demand and climate change.
• Cumulative Impacts. CEQA Guidelines define cumulative impacts as that consisting of an impact which is created as a result of the combination of the project and other projects causing related impacts. Cumulative analysis will focus on issues such as regional commuting and congestion, regional air quality, greenhouse gases, noise, and services and utilities, etc. • Growth-Inducing Impacts. As required by State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2, the EIR will assess the ways in which the sites rezoning could, either directly or indirectly, foster economic or population growth (e.g., job creation that substantially exceeds housing supply), the construction of additional housing, or the extension of arterials or infrastructure (e.g., sewer lines) in outlying areas that may contribute to or stimulate future growth. • Impacts Found Not to Be Significant. We will summarize potential environmental impact where no significant impacts were identified.
Meetings Products
• N/A • Admin Draft EIR (D&B, Team)
• Electronic copies: PDF and Word
TASK 5: DRAFT EIR PREPARATION AND PUBLIC REVIEW
5-A: Draft EIR (Team). We will prepare the public review Draft EIR, incorporating changes in response to the City’s comments. We assume that our team will receive one consolidated set of comments on the ADEIR from City staff, ideally in track changes with comments as needed. We will then prepare and submit one electronic copy of a “screen check” draft to permit final review by City staff to ensure that City comments on the ADEIR have been addressed to the City’s satisfaction. Following any final revisions, we will produce the public review Draft EIR, and provide an electronic copy with Word and PDF versions.
5-B: Notice of Completion (D&B, Staff). D&B will prepare an electronic copy of the Notice of Completion (NOC) to accompany the required copies of the DEIR to the State Clearinghouse. The team assumes one round of City review and comment on the NOC and that City staff will be responsible for distributing the NOC and DEIR to the State Clearinghouse. 5-C: Notice of Availability (D&B, Staff). D&B will prepare an electronic copy of the Notice of Availability (NOA) of the DEIR for filing with the San Mateo County Clerk/Recorder. D&B assumes that one round of City review and comment on the NOA will be required. D&B will be responsible for adequately satisfying all filing and noticing requirements associated with the NOA in the manner required under CEQA and/or other applicable regulations, with the exception of public noticing in newspaper publications.
Meetings Products
• N/A • Screen Check Draft EIR (D&B, Team)
• Electronic copies: PDF and Word
• Public Review Draft EIR (D&B, Team)
• Electronic copies: PDF and Word
• Notice of Completion (D&B, Staff)
• Notice of Availability (D&B, Staff)
TASK 6: FINAL EIR AND HEARINGS
6-A: Response to Comments and Final EIR (Team). Our team will prepare a Final EIR which will address all comments received on the Draft EIR. Changes to the Draft EIR text will be made in strikeout/underline formatting to permit easy tracking of all changes. The EIR will include appropriately detailed responses to all written and oral comments received. A list of letters, emails, and verbal responses will be keyed to detailed responses and/ or changes in EIR text as appropriate. Our team is very familiar with the level of detail of comments typically received from local agencies (e.g., Caltrans, C/CAG). Given the volume of General Plan EIR comments, the scope anticipates up to ~150 hours of staff time to prepare responses to comment and other Final EIR components. We anticipate that responses that are within the scope of work and budget will consist of relatively detailed explanations, elaborations, or clarifications of the data contained in the Draft EIR, as well as minor corrections of background information. However, if substantive new analysis or issues that could not have been anticipated or new alternatives, or substantial project changes need to be addressed, or if the effort exceeds the budgeted amount because of the number or complexity of responses, a contract amendment may be required.
We will provide an electronic copy of the administrative draft Final EIR in Word and PDF for City staff review. Upon receipt of one set of consolidated staff comments, if possible in track changes with comments as needed, our team will provide a “screen check” draft in Word and PDF for final review by City staff to ensure that City comments on the Draft EIR have been addressed to the City’s satisfaction.
We will then incorporate final changes and submit five (5) printed, bound copies, and Word and PDF versions of the Response to Comments and Final EIR to the City. 6-B: Mitigation Measures and Monitoring and Reporting Plan (D&B, Team). To the extent that additional mitigation measures are necessary, we will closely coordinate with City staff on the development of mitigation measures and the required Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP). If a MMRP is deemed necessary, all such measures would be assessed for feasibility and related to known or potential funding sources. Clear lines of responsibility for implementation would also be included, along with suggested timing. As the MMRP would be integral to tracking performance standards and achievement of programmatic mitigations, D&B would work closely with City staff on development of the MMRP and identification of appropriate tracking mechanisms.
6-C: Public Hearings (D&B). We will present the Draft and Final EIR at up to a combined three hearings/meetings of the Planning Commission and City Council. D&B will work with staff to decide how to best distribute the hearings/meetings. If staff chooses to conduct a Planning Commission meeting during the public review period, a second Planning Commission meeting will need to be held after the completion of the Draft and Final EIR for the Planning Commission to make a recommendation on the Draft and Final EIR. The City Council will certify the EIR. 6-D: Notice of Determination (D&B). Upon certification of the Final EIR, staff will prepare a Notice of Determination for the Final EIR, which staff will be responsible for filing and distributing. 6-E: Findings and Statement of Overriding Consideration (D&B). D&B will prepare Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations as required under CEQA Guidelines sections 15091 and 15093, respectively.
Meetings Products
• Planning Commission and City Council
Hearings (up to 3)
• Admin Draft Final EIR (D&B, Team)
• Screen Check Draft Final EIR (D&B, Team)
• Final EIR (D&B, Team)
• Mitigation Measures and Monitoring and
Reporting Plan, if needed (D&B)
• Notice of Determination (D&B)
• Findings and Statement of Overriding
Consideration
SCOPE OF WORK ASSUMPTIONS
Our Scope of Work and budget is based on the following assumptions:
• Invoices. Invoices will be based on hourly costs, and will be submitted monthly. • Meeting Attendance. The budget assumes attendance at meetings as shown in the Scope of Work.
Costs of additional meeting attendance would be on a time and materials basis if requested; such costs are not included within the guaranteed maximum fee. Bi-weekly (every two weeks) coordination phone calls with staff will be held.
• Final EIR Effort. Because the effort to prepare the Final EIR (Response to Comments on the Draft EIR) is not predictable in advance, our budget assumes that ~150 hours (100 hours of D&B time and 49 hours of subconsultant time) will be sufficient for this task. Additional effort will be additional services.
• Consolidated Comments and Direction. City staff will provide a single set of consolidated comments on the review drafts of all documents.
• Number of Review Drafts. Each product will be finalized following one round of staff review. Prior to publication, electronic Screencheck drafts of documents will be provided. • Electronic Documents. We will provide digital files of documents in Word and Adobe PDF formats, available by electronic transfer. Files will be provided both in high-resolution format for printing as well as low-resolution for posting on the City’s website. Maps will be provided in native file formats (Illustrator or ArcGIS) upon conclusion of the project. • Printing. Printing is not assumed in our budget. We would be happy to print hard copies of documents for an additional cost.
• Travel Expenses, Mailing Costs, and Other Direct Costs. The budget includes direct costs related to the project, including travel expenses, database searched, and other similar reimbursable items.
City staff will be responsible for any filing fee.
• Reallocation by Task/Subconsultant. Dyett & Bhatia reserves the right to reallocate budget by task or consultant team member, provided the overall project budget is not affected. • Increased Costs Due to Delay. Should the project extend for more than two years for no fault of consultant, the budget for remaining work would be adjusted to account for change in costs/billing rates (based on change in San Francisco-Oakland-San JoséCPI from project start).
OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
EXHIBIT B
Compensation
CITY shall pay CONSULTANT for the Services on a cost reimbursement basis, up to the Cost Ceiling (as defined in Section 2.1 of the Agreement). CONSULTANT agrees to use appropriate methods to contain its fees and costs under this Agreement. Compensation shall include only the following costs, which shall all count toward the Cost Ceiling:
1. Direct Labor
Direct labor costs shall be the total number of hours worked on the job by each employee times the agreed hourly rate for such employee's labor as set forth on the attached Exhibit B-1. CITY will pay all personnel at their regular straight-time rate, including any work performed on overtime or on holidays or weekends.
2. Subconsultant Costs
Subconsultant services shall be billed at cost plus a 10 percent markup. CONSULTANT shall provide a copy of each subconsultant's invoice for which it seeks payment from CITY with any invoice in which such payment is requested.
3. Other Direct Costs
The following categories of costs are eligible for reimbursement, which shall be made at the actual cost to CONSULTANT without any additional mark-up:
a. Reasonable living and traveling expenses of employees when away from home office on business in its prosecution of the Services. CONSULTANT must have prior approval of CITY to be reimbursed for these expenses.
b. Automobile expenses for personal vehicle use, if necessary, at the IRS approved mileage rate.
c. Reproduction of drawings and specifications by CONSULTANT as required under this Agreement, at rates prevailing in this community for bulk reproduction or at other reasonable rates approved by CITY.
d. Special overnight delivery or messenger services.
Payments to CONSULTANT for reimbursable costs/expenses will be made only after the specific costs/expenses have been incurred and CONSULTANT has submitted substantiating documentation, such as copies of paid invoices or other documentation confirming that such costs/expenses have been incurred.
OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
EXHIBIT B-1
Proposal for City of Pacifica: EIR on Housing Rezoning
ATTACHMENT C: BUDGET BY TASK
Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5
Project
Initiation Scoping Project Description
and Alternatives
Administrative
Draft EIR
Draft EIR Final EIR Hearings (3)
Dyett & Bhatia
Rajeev Bhatia, Principal $ 265 $ 795 $ 795 $ 795 $ 6,360 $ 2,120 $ 2,120 $ 3,180 $ 16,165 Senior Associate 190 $ 1,330 $ 570 $ 950 $ 10,450 $ 2,470 $ 2,850 $ 3,420 $ 22,040 Associate 175 700 525 1,050 15,750 4,375 3,500 - 25,900 Planner 140 - - - 13,440 2,100 5,320 - 20,860
Sr. GIS Specialist 165 495 - 495 6,600 1,320 - - 8,910
Project Associate 105 315 - - 4,200 2,520 2,100 - 9,135 Direct Cost 50 700 - 50 50 100 950
Sub-Total $ 3,685 $ 2,590 $ 3,290 $ 56,850 $ 14,905 $ 15,940 $ 6,700 $ 103,960 DKS
Principal $ 325 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,300 $ - $ 325 $ - $ 1,625 Project Manager 260 $ 1,040 $ - $ - $ 8,320 $ - $ 1,820 $ - $ 11,180 Project Engineer 195 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,365 $ - $ 195 $ - $ 1,560 Assistant Engineer 180 $ 360 $ - $ - $ 14,040 $ - $ 1,620 $ - $ 16,020 Project Administrator 180 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,080 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,080 Direct Cost 50 50 $ 100
Sub-Total $ 1,450 $ - $ - $ 26,105 $ - $ 4,010 $ 31,565 WRA
Principal $ 289 $ 289 $ - $ - $ 1,734 $ - $ 578 $ - $ 2,601 Senior Associate 273 $ 546 $ - $ - $ 2,730 $ - $ 1,092 $ - $ 4,368 Staff 180 $ 360 $ - $ - $ 3,960 $ - $ 1,440 $ - $ 5,760 Staff 164 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,592 $ - $ 1,640 $ - $ 6,232
Staff 180 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,880 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,880
Staff 180 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,960 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,960
Direct Cost $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Sub-Total $ 1,195 $ - $ - $ 19,856 $ - $ 4,750 $ - $ 25,801 Geocon
Principal Engineer $ 240 $ - $ - $ - $ 7,920 $ - $ 480 $ - $ 8,400 Associate Engineer 210 - - - 12,600 - 840 - 13,440
Staff Engineer 130 - - - 6,500 - - - 6,500
Research Assistant 105 - - - 3,675 - - - 3,675
Direct Cost - - - - - -
Sub-Total $ - $ - $ - $ 30,695 $ - $ 1,320 $ - $ 32,015 Charles M. Salter Associates
Vice President $ 325 $ - $ - $ - $ 975 $ - $ - $ - $ 975 Associate 225 - - - 4,050 - - - 4,050
Direct Cost - - - - - - - -
Sub-Total $ - $ - $ - $ 5,025 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,025
TOTAL FEE $ 6,330 $ 2,590 $ 3,290 $ 138,531 $ 14,905 $ 26,020 $ 6,700 $ 198,366 TOTAL
Hourly
Rate
Task 6