Agenda — Pacifica City Council, January 8, 2024 (part 1 of 2)

CITY OF PACIFICA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Council Chambers
2212 Beach Blvd
Pacifica, CA 94044
Mayor Sue Vaterlaus
Mayor pro Tem Sue Beckmeyer
Councilmember Mary Bier
Councilmember Tygarjas Bigstyck
Councilmember Christine Boles
City Council Regular Meeting 1 January 08, 2024
SPECIAL and REGULAR MEETING
January 08, 2024 (MONDAY)
www.cityofpacifica.org
Off-street parking is allowed by permit for attendance at official public meetings.

Vehicles parked without permits are subject to citation. You should obtain a permit from the rack in the lobby and place it on the dashboard of your vehicle in such a manner as is visible to law enforcement personnel.

PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES DURING MEETING
Alternative Ways to Observe and Participate in the Meeting:

The primary method for observing and participating in the meeting is in-person at the meeting location published in the meeting agenda. However, there are alternative ways to observe and participate:
• Join Zoom Webinar: https://pacifica-gov.zoom.us/j/81156158241 • Watch on TV on Comcast channel 26
• Watch a Live Stream of the meeting by following https://www.cityofpacifica.org/LiveStream or www.pacificcoast.tv
• Live Remote Public Comments (offered on a pilot basis):
• Join Zoom Webinar: https://pacifica-gov.zoom.us/j/81156158241 • OR Dial-in: 1-669-900-6833 | Webinar ID: 811 5615 8241 o Press * 9 to raise your hand to request to speak.
o Press * 6 to unmute when called upon to speak by the last 4-digits of your phone #. • When the Mayor announces the Agenda Item on which you would like to comment, raise your hand in Zoom. You will be called upon my screenname or last 4-digits of phone number if dialing in. Please mute any background sound and state your full name at the start of your comment.

Please note that Alternative platforms for participation are subject to underlying technology functionality and may be modified or interrupted at any time without notice. • Written Public Comments:

BEFORE THE MEETING: Written public comments may be submitted in advance by 12:00 p.m. on the meeting date by email to: [email protected]. Written public comments submitted by email should adhere to the following:
• Clearly indicate the Agenda Item No. or specify “Public Comment on Item Not on Agenda” in the Subject Line
• Include the submitter’s full name
Written public comments received by 12:00 p.m. on the meeting date will be provided in their entirety to the City Council and posted to the City’s website prior to the meeting but will not be read verbally at the meeting.

AT THE MEETING: Materials in writing provided at the meeting should provide seven (7) copies to provide for each Councilmember, City Clerk and City staff.

City Council Regular Meeting 2 January 08, 2024
6:30 PM - CLOSED SESSION
A. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (§ 54956.9(d)(1)) . Name of Case: Aronovsky, et al. v. City of Pacifica, Ignatian Corporation, et al. (San Mateo Superior Court Case Nos. 21CIV5904, 21CIV6031).
7:00 PM OPEN SESSION
Call to Order
Roll Call
Reading of Land Acknowledgment
The City of Pacifica acknowledges that we occupy the unceded ancestral homeland of the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples, who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco Peninsula. We honor the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples for their enduring commitment to Mother Earth. As the Indigenous protectors of this land and in accordance with their traditions, the Ramaytush Ohlone have never ceded, lost, nor forgotten their responsibilities as the caretakers of this place, as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. We affirm their sovereign rights as First Peoples and wish to pay our respects to the ancestors, elders, and relatives of the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples.

Salute to the Flag led by Mayor Vaterlaus
Closed Session Report

CONSENT CALENDAR
Persons wishing to address the Council on any Consent Calendar item may do so at this time. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes. Those wishing to address the Council on any item listed on the agenda should submit a speaker card to the City Clerk.

Public meetings are a limited public forum, meaning that there are rules for commenting at these meetings. Comments on consent agenda items must relate to that specific item.

If comments do not relate to a specific agenda item, then City will provide you with an initial warning to stay on topic. If the warning is not followed, the Mayor will direct the City Clerk to cut off the microphone.

Items on the consent calendar will be adopted by one motion unless a Councilmember requests, before the vote on the motion, to have an item discussed. Time limit on comments is three minutes or less.

1. Approval of Disbursements for 12/01/23 through 12/31/23.

PROPOSED ACTION: Receive and file the Monthly Check Register Report for the month of December 2023.

2. Approval of Minutes
City Council Regular Meeting 3 January 08, 2024
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to approve the minutes for the following: (1) December 5, 2023 City Council Study Session and (2) December 11, 2023 City Council Regular Meeting.

3. Continuation of Proclamation of Local Emergency of the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the End of Beach Boulevard.

PROPOSED ACTION: Accept report and make a determination that conditions of local emergency continue to exist within the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard.

4. Continuation of Proclamation of Local Emergency at the Anza Pump Station.

PROPOSED ACTION: Accept Report and Make a Determination that Conditions of Local Emergency Continue to Exist at the Anza Pump Station at the Pacifica State Beach.

5. 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act Development Fee Review
PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica Approving 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023.”

6. Annual Part-Time Salary Schedule Update
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to adopt the resolution approving the annual parttime salary schedule update that went into effect January 1, 2024.

7. Amendment No. 1 to Agreement between the City of Pacifica and Serra Cab for Senior Transportation Services
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to adopt a Resolution approving Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement between the City of Pacifica and Serra Yellow Cab to increase rates for the periods January 1, 2024 to June 30, 2024 and July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 for the Senior Transportation Services CaR Program such that the total fees for services under the Agreement shall remain unchanged at $85,0000.

8. Consultant Services Agreement for Housing Related Activities and Assignments Between the City of Pacifica and the Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) of San Mateo County.

PROPOSED ACTION: Move to adopt a Resolution approving a Consultant Services Agreement with the Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (“HEART”) of San Mateo County for housing related activities assignments and related services with a fixed monthly rate of $3,166.64 until June 30, 2026, for a total of 358 hours of consultants services each year for approximately 30 months and to authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.

9. Resolution Authorizing a Contract Extension with Creative Digital Agency for Continuing Marketing Services
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to adopt a Resolution approving a one year extension to consultant services agreement between the City and Creative Digital Agency (CDA) to continue providing marketing services and authorize City Manager to execute the City Council Regular Meeting 4 January 08, 2024
necessary amendments not to exceed the budget authority of $75,000, with an option to extend for two additional years at City Manager's discretion.

10. Resolution - Approving Master Agreement For Consulting Services with Woodard & Curran for Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution that:

A. Authorizes the City Manager to award and execute a Master Agreement For Consulting Services and Task Order No. 1 with Woodard & Curran, Inc. for sole source services and for providing engineering services for the Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project; and
B. Appropriates $75,070.50 from Fund 34 Wastewater Sewer CIP fund balance to Sewer System Master Plan Project (C007); and
C. Approves a total project budget of $91,953 which includes 15% contingency in the amount of $11,994; and
D. Authorizes the City Manager to execute all documents related to the project and future task orders not to exceed the project budget amount.

11. Ratification of Proclamation of Local Emergency related to December 28, 2023, High Tide/Large Wave Events
PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution ratifying the Proclamation of Local Emergency related to a December 28, 2023 High Tide/Large Wave Events by the City Manager acting as Director of Emergency Services issued on January 5, 2024.

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA
This portion of the Agenda is available for the public to address the City Council on any issue that is not on the Agenda. Any person wishing to address the Council shall be recognized by the Mayor during this time, provided, however, that only items not on the Agenda for that meeting may be addressed. Comments on non-agendized items must address matters within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City. If comments do not address matters within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City, the City will provide you with an initial warning to stay within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City. If the warning is not followed, the Mayor will direct the City Clerk to cut off the microphone.

Councilmembers shall not enter into debate with speakers under Public Comments on Items Not on the Posted Agenda. A maximum of three minutes will be allowed for any speaker.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
The purpose of Council Communications is for Councilmembers to inform each other of items of potential interest to other Councilmembers, such as interagency meetings.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
The purpose of Staff Communications is for the City Manager to offer announcements as appropriate.

City Council Regular Meeting 5 January 08, 2024
PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE.

CONSIDERATION

12. Introduction of an Ordinance Repealing and Replacing Article 2-“Animal Regulation:

Licensing, Vaccinations, Dangerous Animals, and Prohibited Conduct” of Chapter 1, “Animal Control” within Title 6, “Sanitation and Health” to clarify existing definitions, enact additional requirements for animal control and revise animal control service fees”; and finding introduction of Ordinance exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (General Rule Exemption)
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to waive the first reading and introduce by title only “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Pacifica Repealing and Replacing Article 2- “Animal Regulation: Licensing, Vaccinations, Dangerous Animals, and Prohibited Conduct” of Chapter 1, “Animal Control” within Title 6, “Sanitation and Health” to clarify existing definitions, enact additional requirements for animal control and revise animal control service fees”; and finding introduction of Ordinance exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (General Rule Exemption)

13. Update regarding the community engagement plan for the Local Coastal Land Use Plan (LCLUP) certification process.

PROPOSED ACTION: Consider and approve a revised community engagement plan for Pacifica’s efforts to obtain CCC certification of the LCLUP, and confirm reprioritization of Strategic Plan workplan items assigned to the Planning Department.

14. 2024 City Council Liaison and Committee Assignments PROPOSED ACTION: Review the list of City Council Liaison and Committee Assignments, make any modifications for the calendar year 2024, and approve the final list.

ADJOURN
NOTICE: If you challenge a city's zoning, planning or other decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Judicial review of any city administrative decision may be had only if a petition is filed with the court not later than the 90th day following the date upon which the decision becomes final. Judicial review of environmental determinations may be subject to a shorter time period for litigation, in certain cases 30 days following the date of the final decision The City of Pacifica will provide assistance for disabled citizens upon at least 24 hours advance notice to the City Manager’s Office (650) 738-7301, or send request via email to:
[email protected] if you need sign language assistance or written material printed in a larger font or taped, advance notice is necessary. All meeting rooms are accessible to the disabled.

The Pacifica Municipal Code is available online at the City’s website (www.cityofpacifica.org/municode); City Council Regular Meeting 6 January 08, 2024

HOW TO OBTAIN CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS
Posted agendas:

Agendas are posted no later than Friday prior to the City Council meeting date, at the entrance to the City Hall location at the Pacifica Community Center, 540 Crespi Drive.

View on the Internet:

Follow the link to Council agenda, at www.cityofpacifica.org E-mail subscription:

Send a request to Sarah Coffey, at [email protected] City Clerk’s Office/City Manager’s Office
City Hall, 540 Crespi Drive
Council meetings:

Agendas are available at the City Council meeting

HOW TO REACH YOUR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
• Governor Gavin Newsom, State Capitol Building, Sacramento CA 95814 (916) 445-2841 • State Senator Josh Becker, 1528 So. El Camino Real, Suite 303, San Mateo CA 94402 (650) 212-3313 • Assembly Member Marc Berman, 721 Colorado Ave, Suite 101, Palo Alto CA 94303 (650) 324-0224 • Congresswoman Anna Eshoo, 698 Emerson Street, Palo Alto CA 94301 (650) 323-2984 • Senator Alex Padilla, B03 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington DC 20510 (202) 224-3553 • Senator Laphonza Butler, SD-G10 Dirksen Senate Office Building, Washington DC 20510 (202) 224-3841 • President Joseph R. Biden, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington DC 20500

CITY COUNCIL
• Mayor Sue Vaterlaus, [email protected]
• Mayor pro Tem Sue Beckmeyer, [email protected]
• Councilmember Mary Bier, [email protected]
• Councilmember Tygarjas Bigstyck, tbigstyck@ pacifica.gov • Councilmember Christine Boles, [email protected]

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/8/2024
1 SUBJECT:

Approval of Disbursements for 12/01/23 through 12/31/23.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Receive and file the Monthly Check Register Report for the month of December 2023.

STAFF CONTACT:

Lucy Xie, Deputy Finance Director
(650) 738-7395
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

Staff has submitted the following Monthly Check Register Report per California Government Code, Title 4, Division 3, Part 3, Chapter 3, Section 41004:
• Disbursements dated 12/01/23 through 12/31/23 are in the amount of $ 3,350,747.86. (Attachment 1).

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with acceptance of the Monthly Check Register Report.

ORIGINATED BY:

Finance Department
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Disbursements -FY 23-24 - 12-1 to 12-31-23 (PDF)
1 Packet Pg. 7
Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: WEDNESDAY JAN0324 13:53 Page: 1

CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/23 - 12/31/23 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL

PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 67472 450.42 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00094 ADAM-HILL COMPANY, THE 1 67473 1047.33 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04980 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 1 67474 4684.10 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00338 BOBCAT OF THE BAY-FREMONT 1 67475 4150.00 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02779 BRAGATO PAVING COMPANY INC. 1 67476 250.00 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05984 BROOKE KIMBRO 1 67477 1885.50 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05658 BSK ASSOCIATES 1 67478 109031.55 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02502 BURKE WILLIAMS AND SORENSEN LLP 1 67479 1200.00 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02692 CABLECOM LLC 1 67480 6195.14 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00483 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 1 67481 45.00 12/01/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05969 CHAD LAWIE 1 67482 250.00 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05980 CHICANO LATINA FOUNDATION 1 67483 2756.55 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00507 CHILDCARE CAREERS 1 67484 1190.97 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00510 CINTAS CORPORATION #464 1 67485 841.50 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05082 COLUMN, PBC 1 67486 750.75 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02168 COMCAST 1 67487 1568.22 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01204 CRESCO EQUIPMENT RENTALS 1 67488 88687.57 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00611 CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 67489 16352.19 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00025 DALY CITY/CITY OF 1 67490 8000.00 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02201 DISCOUNT PLUMBING, INC. 1 67491 50942.78 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01854 DYETT & BHATIA 1 67492 4727.25 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02767 FLYERS ENERGY, LLC 1 67493 5310.00 12/01/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03930 FREYER & LAURETA, INC. 1 67494 10500.00 12/01/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05399 GOVINVEST INC. 1 67495 643.66 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00872 GRAINGER 1 67496 780.00 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03947 GRANICUS, INC. 1 67497 36815.00 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03616 GROUP 4 ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH PLANNING I Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: WEDNESDAY JAN0324 13:53 Page: 2

CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/23 - 12/31/23 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL

PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 67498 100.20 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04842 HEMRAJ SINGH 1 67499 4447.17 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03203 HYGRADE BUSINESS GROUP, INC. 1 67500 519.59 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04085 JAMES FORD, INC. 1 67501 204902.51 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02113 JM SQUARED ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 67502 708.67 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01014 JOHN THE SIGN GUY LLC 1 67503 66.88 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01812 KBA DOCUSYS 1 67504 4000.00 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05981 KH EQUITIES- DANIEL MENSE 1 67505 1390.00 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04724 MARK RESOLVE, INC. 1 67506 527.17 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03779 MAXX METALS 1 67507 255.08 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01142 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 1 67508 880.38 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01154 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 1 67509 693.75 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04077 METROPOLITAN PLANNING GROUP 1 67510 2000.00 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05983 MICHAEL OLSEN

Page 1 of 10 ends

http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=&FileName=D:\GemsEnv... 1/3/2024

1.a
Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: Disbursements -FY 23-24 - 12-1 to 12-31-23 (5556 : Disbursements - Dated 12/01/23 through 12/31/23) 1 67511 262.00 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05985 NATALIE BELL 1 67512 387.53 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00001 NG, EDWIN 1 67513 11150.00 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04632 NICHOLS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, CHTD 1 67514 400.00 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01214 OCEANA SMOG TEST ONLY CENTER 1 67515 1402.72 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01217 OFFICE DEPOT 1 67516 198.00 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01239 PACIFIC FIRE SAFE 1 67517 3061.63 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01244 PACIFIC NURSERIES 1 67518 20.96 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05437 PACIFIC PUBLISHERS, LLC 1 67519 332.94 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01295 PETERSON 1 67520 149.09 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01317 PREFERRED ALLIANCE, INC. 1 67521 1221.25 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04026 RANEY PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, INC 1 67522 2180.23 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04802 RECORDS CONTROL SERVICES 1 67523 3750.00 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04806 RICHARD SMITH Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: WEDNESDAY JAN0324 13:53 Page: 3

CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/23 - 12/31/23 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL

PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 67524 6639.75 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05774 RINCON CONSULTANTS INC 1 67525 299.99 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00001 ROMERO, BRYAN 1 67526 32.83 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01423 SAN MATEO LAWN MOWER SHOP 1 67527 59262.13 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04646 SCHAAF & WHEELER 1 67528 550.00 12/01/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01501 SMELLY MEL'S PLUMBING 1 67529 48075.32 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01560 SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. 1 67530 59.00 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05692 TJC AND ASSOCIATES INC. 1 67531 600.00 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05982 TOTAL UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION 1 67532 1752.24 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01077 TREE MANAGEMENT EXPERTS 1 67533 191.01 12/01/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01637 TURF & INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT CO 1 67534 194.60 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01647 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY SPECIALISTS 1 67535 861.78 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01648 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF NORTHERN CA 1 67536 19105.10 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02527 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 1 67537 233.88 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01663 URBAN FARMER STORE, THE 1 67538 2776.37 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03835 US FOODS, INC 1 67539 1537.88 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01684 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 67540 3897.60 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01725 WINTZELL YLVA 1 67541 127.78 12/01/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01747 ZEP SALES & SERVICE 1 67542 398563.53 12/04/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05495 W.E. LYONS CONSTRUCTION CO. 1 67543 2589.20 12/04/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00022 SAN MATEO COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 1 67544 138.31 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00009 AT&T 1 67545 8408.16 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00094 ADAM-HILL COMPANY, THE 1 67546 45.79 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00136 ALHAMBRA 1 67547 860.35 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00138 ALL INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC. 1 67548 1959.79 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04980 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 1 67549 890.94 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05556 AMERICAN DEBRIS BOX SERVICE INC.

Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: WEDNESDAY JAN0324 13:53 Page: 4

CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/23 - 12/31/23 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL

PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME

Page 2 of 10 ends

http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=&FileName=D:\GemsEnv... 1/3/2024

1.a
Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: Disbursements -FY 23-24 - 12-1 to 12-31-23 (5556 : Disbursements - Dated 12/01/23 through 12/31/23) 1 67550 213.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00175 AMERICAN RED CROSS 1 67551 4198.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05990 AQUATIC INFORMATICS INC 1 67552 7818.98 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00217 ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS 1 67553 1100.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04561 AVINA, ANGEL 1 67554 113.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00011 C.W.E.A. 1 67555 3700.00 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02692 CABLECOM LLC 1 67556 428.52 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00449 CAL-LINE EQUIPMENT INC. 1 67557 4950.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05483 CALIFORNIA CONSULTING, INC. 1 67558 14905.49 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00421 CALIFORNIA DIESEL & POWER 1 67559 66.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00014 CALIFORNIA STATE OF 1 67560 592.17 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00452 CALPICO INC. 1 67561 1043.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01690 CALTEST ANALYTICAL LAB 1 67562 4308.47 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00483 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 1 67563 22.50 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05969 CHAD LAWIE 1 67564 2877.75 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04689 CHRISENTIA PIZZO 1 67565 2699.71 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00510 CINTAS CORPORATION #464 1 67566 5790.15 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05552 CIVICPLUS, LLC 1 67567 1881.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05082 COLUMN, PBC 1 67568 470.18 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02168 COMCAST 1 67569 100.00 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03295 COMMISSION ON TEACHER CREDENTIALING 1 67570 42478.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00022 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 1 67571 130.00 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04000 CRIME SCENE CLEANERS, INC. 1 67572 31912.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00611 CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 67573 502.19 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00025 DALY CITY/CITY OF 1 67574 2500.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05099 DIGITAL ASSURANCE CERTIFICATION LLC 1 67575 128.97 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02614 DISH Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: WEDNESDAY JAN0324 13:53 Page: 5

CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/23 - 12/31/23 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL

PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 67576 1950.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00690 DU-ALL SAFETY, LLC 1 67577 4537.46 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05493 ESPOSTO'S FINE FOODS DBA THE BONEYARD 1 67578 500.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00001 ESRICK, CLINT 1 67579 17320.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03331 EWERS ENGINEERING 1 67580 14.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03047 FASTRAK INVOICE PROCESSING DEPT 1 67581 920.75 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01960 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 67582 8765.13 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02767 FLYERS ENERGY, LLC 1 67583 474.60 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05145 GOLDEN STATE EMERGENCY VEHICLE SERVICE I 1 67584 1704.32 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00872 GRAINGER 1 67585 4923.42 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04131 HDL SOFTWARE, LLC 1 67586 402.92 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00919 HERC RENTALS INC. 1 67587 456.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00926 HILTON IRENE 1 67588 368.29 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04850 HOME DEPOT USA, INC. 1 67589 240.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04085 JAMES FORD, INC. 1 67590 350.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05987 JFCS 1 67591 1230.60 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01014 JOHN THE SIGN GUY LLC 1 67592 56.25 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01812 KBA DOCUSYS

Page 3 of 10 ends

http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=&FileName=D:\GemsEnv... 1/3/2024

1.a
Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: Disbursements -FY 23-24 - 12-1 to 12-31-23 (5556 : Disbursements - Dated 12/01/23 through 12/31/23) 1 67593 650.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05991 KEVIN SCHOFIELD 1 67594 198.30 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01316 LINDE GAS & EQUIPMENT INC. 1 67595 358.25 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01120 MALLORY COMPANY/THE 1 67596 525.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05776 MARK GRIFFIN, INC. 1 67597 106.65 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 MARTINEZ, ROBERT 1 67598 276.33 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03779 MAXX METALS 1 67599 3835.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03790 MAZE & ASSOCIATES 1 67600 794.13 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01154 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 1 67601 1925.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01378 MUSCIO ELECTRIC Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: WEDNESDAY JAN0324 13:53 Page: 6

CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/23 - 12/31/23 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL

PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 67602 1478.17 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04549 NAF SERVICES, INC. 1 67603 4877.84 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01206 NORTH COAST COUNTY WATER DIST. 1 67604 2000.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03215 O'CONNELL, MICHAEL 1 67605 186.98 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01217 OFFICE DEPOT 1 67606 9688.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05958 ONE WATER LLC 1 67607 766.13 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01258 PACIFICA POLICE RESERVES 1 67608 200.10 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04139 PET FOOD EXPRESS 1 67609 2000.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05988 PETE SHOEMAKER 1 67610 2432.88 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04863 POWERDMS, INC. 1 67611 402.52 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01336 QUILL CORPORATION 1 67612 926.30 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00042 R & S ERECTION NORTH PENINSULA INC. 1 67613 506.48 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00001 RILEY, TOMAS 1 67614 3173.10 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00022 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLER 1 67615 78.08 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05197 SAN MATEO COUNTY MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTR 1 67616 1995.25 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00022 SAN MATEO COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICA 1 67617 4002.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03720 SAN MATEO DAILY JOURNAL 1 67618 4880.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05124 SCAPES, INC. 1 67619 1212.43 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01450 SEAVIEW TIRE & BRAKE CENTER 1 67620 250.27 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05465 SIGILLO SUPPLY, INC. 1 67621 615.09 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01505 SNELL & CO J 1 67622 17666.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00044 SWRCB 1 67623 1140.76 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02642 T-MOBILE CORPORATION 1 67624 1770.50 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01587 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE 1 67625 1402.50 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05665 TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS 1 67626 1150.95 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01636 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 1 67627 5250.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03457 U.S. BANK Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: WEDNESDAY JAN0324 13:53 Page: 7

CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/23 - 12/31/23 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL

PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 67628 300.20 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04418 U.S. BANK EQUIPMENT FINANCING, INC. 1 67629 9415.32 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04670 U.S. TELEPACIFIC CORP. 1 67630 866.39 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01647 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY SPECIALISTS

Page 4 of 10 ends

http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=&FileName=D:\GemsEnv... 1/3/2024

1.a
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: Disbursements -FY 23-24 - 12-1 to 12-31-23 (5556 : Disbursements - Dated 12/01/23 through 12/31/23) 1 67631 1378.39 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04576 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC 1 67632 487.30 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02922 UNLIMITED TOOL REPAIR AND FABRICATION. 1 67633 404.27 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01812 US BANK EQUIPMENT FINANCE 1 67634 5853.80 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03835 US FOODS, INC 1 67635 258.68 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01667 USA BLUE BOOK 1 67636 2557.52 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01684 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 67637 650.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04121 WHENTOWORK, INC. 1 67638 1459.41 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01717 WHITE CAP CONST. SUPPLY 1 67639 3277.13 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01751 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 1 67640 6396.69 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00009 AT&T 1 67641 9290.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05976 A-1 FENCE AND DECK, INC 1 67642 425.67 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00118 AIR EXCHANGE INC 1 67643 574.61 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00122 AIRGAS USA, LLC 1 67644 2175.54 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04980 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 1 67645 137.07 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00056 ARAMARK 1 67646 46.70 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00009 AT&T LONG DISTANCE 1 67647 129.69 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00009 AT&T MOBILITY 1 67648 4669.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03634 BAY POWER LLC GENERATOR SYSTEM DESIGN AN 1 67649 126.55 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00293 BEARING AGENCIES INC 1 67650 1880.50 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02085 BIOMAAS LLC 1 67651 95.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05127 BLEYLE ELEVATOR, INC. 1 67652 2409.97 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00335 BLUE RIBBON SUPPLY COMPANY 1 67653 120.39 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00001 BRAUN, LUCIE Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: WEDNESDAY JAN0324 13:53 Page: 8

CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/23 - 12/31/23 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL

PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 67654 857.02 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00365 BROADMOOR LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 1 67655 1405.72 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00421 CALIFORNIA DIESEL & POWER 1 67656 2555.23 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05895 CAPITAL ONE TRADE CREDIT 1 67657 9810.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00483 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 1 67658 2908.38 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00507 CHILDCARE CAREERS 1 67659 334.87 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00510 CINTAS 1 67660 2378.45 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00510 CINTAS CORPORATION #464 1 67661 575.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02822 CITY AUTO SUPPLY 1 67662 635.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02372 COIT SERVICES INC 1 67663 240.00 12/14/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00019 COLMA FIREMAN'S SOCIAL CLUB 1 67664 27.34 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02168 COMCAST 1 67665 279.03 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01374 CORE & MAIN 1 67666 4420.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05341 CREATIVE DIGITAL AGENCY INC. 1 67667 1568.22 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01204 CRESCO EQUIPMENT RENTALS 1 67668 9800.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02201 DISCOUNT PLUMBING, INC. 1 67669 250.00 12/14/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 DOMINICI, JEFF 1 67670 947.10 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02130 DRYCO CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 67671 585.29 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00745 ENVIRONMENTAL EXPRESS, INC. 1 67672 21.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03047 FASTRAK INVOICE PROCESSING DEPT 1 67673 100.45 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03047 FASTRAK VIOLATION PROCESSING DEPARTMENT

Page 5 of 10 ends

http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=&FileName=D:\GemsEnv... 1/3/2024

1.a
Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: Disbursements -FY 23-24 - 12-1 to 12-31-23 (5556 : Disbursements - Dated 12/01/23 through 12/31/23) 1 67674 3579.13 12/14/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03006 FEHR PEERS 1 67675 4791.38 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02767 FLYERS ENERGY, LLC 1 67676 200.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05394 GAIL EDWARDS 1 67677 220563.78 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04369 GHD INC. 1 67678 416.27 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00872 GRAINGER 1 67679 593.47 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00875 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY #26577 Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: WEDNESDAY JAN0324 13:53 Page: 9

CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/23 - 12/31/23 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL

PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 67680 266.41 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01663 HERITAGE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY GROUP 1 67681 4000.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05995 HSI WORKPLACE COMPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC 1 67682 488.12 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02511 IDEXX LABORATORIES 1 67683 546.88 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00990 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC CONTROL PRODUCTS 1 67684 95.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05333 KASEYA US LLC 1 67685 153.93 12/14/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 KELLY, MATT 1 67686 90000.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05986 KENNETH CORMICAN 1 67687 384.12 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05994 KREFELD'S AWARDS, INC 1 67688 1088.62 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00001 LA, EMILY 1 67689 4326.96 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05533 MCMILLAN ELECTRIC 1 67690 425.22 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01154 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 1 67691 181064.65 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02727 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. 1 67692 227.27 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01183 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 67693 2000.00 12/14/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04719 NETZER, ANITA 1 67694 24649.25 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04632 NICHOLS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, CHTD 1 67695 21644.80 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01206 NORTH COAST COUNTY WATER DIST. 1 67696 830.46 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02486 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 1 67697 200.00 12/14/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01214 OCEANA SMOG TEST ONLY CENTER 1 67698 81.41 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01217 OFFICE DEPOT 1 67699 1261.20 12/14/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00519 OMMM PACIFICA 1 67700 3696.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01238 PACIFIC ECORISK 1 67701 49550.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01250 PACIFICA COMMUNITY TELEVISION 1 67702 14351.93 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00320 PLAN JPA 1 67703 100.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03782 PRIORITY 1 PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT 1 67704 464.65 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01336 QUILL CORPORATION 1 67705 192.04 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01337 R & H WHOLESALE SUPPLY, INC.

Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: WEDNESDAY JAN0324 13:53 Page: 10

CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/23 - 12/31/23 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL

PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 67706 4944.38 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01367 RICE TRUCKING SOIL FARM 1 67707 4350.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04806 RICHARD SMITH 1 67708 1500.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05989 ROBERT LOUIS BANCROFT 1 67709 1201.32 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01450 SEAVIEW TIRE & BRAKE CENTER 1 67710 103.39 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02182 SERVICE PRESS, INC. 1 67711 77.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05677 SFO MEDICAL CLINIC 1 67712 1000.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00044 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD

Page 6 of 10 ends

http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=&FileName=D:\GemsEnv... 1/3/2024

1.a
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: Disbursements -FY 23-24 - 12-1 to 12-31-23 (5556 : Disbursements - Dated 12/01/23 through 12/31/23) 1 67713 32614.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00044 SWRCB 1 67714 12128.06 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05509 THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES 1 67715 2000.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05993 TOM BIEL 1 67716 3996.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05946 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES 1 67717 1033.79 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04576 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC 1 67718 20219.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02527 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 1 67719 2127.42 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03835 US FOODS, INC 1 67720 3309.12 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01684 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 67721 2026.05 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01673 VWR INTERNATIONAL 1 67722 6000.00 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05885 WARWICK GROUP CONSULTANTS, LLC 1 67723 970.40 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01701 WECO INDUSTRIES 1 67724 85.50 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05163 WEX HEALTH, INC. 1 67725 862.95 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01747 ZEP SALES & SERVICE 1 67726 354.93 12/14/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01751 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 1 67727 531634.82 12/19/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05495 W.E. LYONS CONSTRUCTION CO. 1 67728 2161.42 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00009 AT&T
1 67729 450.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01585 ACCUTITE 1 67730 619.06 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00045 ALBERTSONS / SAFEWAY 1 67731 2596.64 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04980 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC.

Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: WEDNESDAY JAN0324 13:53 Page: 11

CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/23 - 12/31/23 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL

PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 67732 376.40 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00009 AT&T
1 67733 600.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03188 ATLAS PLUMBING & ROOTER INC 1 67734 1050.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05996 BALLY DUNES HOA 1 67735 472.05 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 BIANCULLI, RYAN 1 67736 219.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00343 BOLANDER & SONS, L. PH. 1 67737 39350.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05443 CALIFORNIA SEWER ENGINEERING, INC 1 67738 1600.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05443 CALIFORNIA SEWER ENGINEERING, INC 1 67739 3762.12 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04078 CALLYO 2009 CORP 1 67740 154.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01690 CALTEST ANALYTICAL LAB 1 67741 2306.74 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00483 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 1 67742 1598.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00507 CHILDCARE CAREERS 1 67743 1700.89 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00510 CINTAS CORPORATION #464 1 67744 1268.28 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00049 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1 67745 315.52 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03246 COAST COUNTIES PETERBILT & COAST COUNTIE 1 67746 500.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00019 COLMA POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 67747 148.50 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05082 COLUMN, PBC 1 67748 378.70 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02168 COMCAST 1 67749 451.21 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04677 CORODATA RECORDS MANAGEMENT INC 1 67750 515.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00024 CRITICAL REACH 1 67751 1035.40 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00611 CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 67752 1800.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05997 DAN PICKELL 1 67753 18735.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00645 DAVEY TREE EXPERT COMPANY 1 67754 312.40 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05691 DKS ASSOCIATES 1 67755 1117.25 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02130 DRYCO CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Page 7 of 10 ends

http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=&FileName=D:\GemsEnv... 1/3/2024

1.a
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: Disbursements -FY 23-24 - 12-1 to 12-31-23 (5556 : Disbursements - Dated 12/01/23 through 12/31/23) 1 67756 687.38 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02793 EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO., INC 1 67757 5145.23 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03458 EOA INC Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: WEDNESDAY JAN0324 13:53 Page: 12

CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/23 - 12/31/23 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL

PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 67758 77.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00758 EXPERIAN 1 67759 21.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03047 FASTRAK INVOICE PROCESSING DEPT 1 67760 9378.62 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02767 FLYERS ENERGY, LLC 1 67761 2085.25 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04369 GHD INC. 1 67762 392.66 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05145 GOLDEN STATE EMERGENCY VEHICLE SERVICE I 1 67763 34721.15 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05269 GOOD CITY COMPANY 1 67764 3500.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05399 GOVINVEST INC. 1 67765 7056.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03947 GRANICUS, INC. 1 67766 296.06 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05681 GREG JONES ROOFING 1 67767 349.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00001 HIGGINS, JEFF 1 67768 100.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00924 HILL SCOTT 1 67769 212.87 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05532 JOAN ARTHUR 1 67770 311.89 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05788 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 1 67771 437.08 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05848 LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY, LTD 1 67772 456.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05582 LUHDORFF AND SCALMANINI CONSULTING ENGIN 1 67773 16100.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03790 MAZE & ASSOCIATES 1 67774 400.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 02662 MEALS ON WHEELS OF AMERICA 1 67775 255.74 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01154 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 1 67776 125.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01165 MILLER & O'BRIEN 1 67777 974.63 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05964 MOBILE-TECH AUTOMOTIVE INC 1 67778 4009.40 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03955 MOFFATT & NICHOL 1 67779 8472.68 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02727 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. 1 67780 600.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01378 MUSCIO SECURITY 1 67781 2117.38 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04549 NAF SERVICES, INC. 1 67782 37480.67 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04632 NICHOLS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, CHTD 1 67783 13794.84 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01206 NORTH COAST COUNTY WATER DIST.

Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: WEDNESDAY JAN0324 13:53 Page: 13

CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/23 - 12/31/23 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL

PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 67784 350.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01214 OCEANA SMOG TEST ONLY CENTER 1 67785 217.77 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01217 OFFICE DEPOT 1 67786 203030.03 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01240 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. 1 67787 1200.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01240 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. 1 67788 152.70 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00002 PEYTON-REHN, THERESA (PETTY CASH) 1 67789 10612.02 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03782 PRIORITY 1 PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT 1 67790 563.49 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01336 QUILL CORPORATION 1 67791 9935.73 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 03281 REGIONAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES 1 67792 3280.66 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03115 RMI MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, INC. 1 67793 2276.60 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00022 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLER

Page 8 of 10 ends

http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=&FileName=D:\GemsEnv... 1/3/2024

1.a
Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: Disbursements -FY 23-24 - 12-1 to 12-31-23 (5556 : Disbursements - Dated 12/01/23 through 12/31/23) 1 67794 1987.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00055 SAN MATEO COUNTY FORENSIC LAB 1 67795 329.02 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00022 SAN MATEO COUNTY INFORMATION SERVICES 1 67796 6223.06 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01450 SEAVIEW TIRE & BRAKE CENTER 1 67797 13.87 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01534 STANDARD PLUMBING SUPPLY CO. 1 67798 45.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05576 STEVE KWON 1 67799 120.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 05524 STEVEN MICHAEL EVANS JR 1 67800 228.47 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00002 SUZUKI, MARIA (PETTY CASH) 1 67801 1770.50 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01587 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE 1 67802 416.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01602 THOMSON WEST 1 67803 586.43 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01636 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 1 67804 756.55 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 04418 U.S. BANK EQUIPMENT FINANCING, INC. 1 67805 580.19 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01647 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY SPECIALISTS 1 67806 1100.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 02527 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 1 67807 586.07 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01812 US BANK EQUIPMENT FINANCE 1 67808 5000.00 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00001 WACHTELBORN, DUANE 1 67809 132.66 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01717 WHITE CAP CONST. SUPPLY Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: WEDNESDAY JAN0324 13:53 Page: 14

CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/23 - 12/31/23 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL

PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 67810 51.09 12/22/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 00001 YEUNG, CHRISTIE 1 67811 431.75 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05469 BCC BENEFIT COORDINATORS CORPORATION 1 67812 11902.60 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 05469 BCC BENEFIT COORDINATORS CORPORATION 1 67813 10088.17 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 03741 BENEFIT COORDINATORS CORPORATION 1 67814 59.00 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01757 CALIFORNIA ASSN OF PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGH 1 67815 242.76 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 1 67816 783.00 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01757 CLEA
1 67817 100.00 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 67818 200.00 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 67819 100.00 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 67820 707.53 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01758 PACIFICA FIREFIGHTERS UNION 1 67821 840.00 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01759 PACIFICA POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 1 67822 210.00 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01760 PACIFICA POLICE OFFICERS SAVINGS 1 67823 420.00 12/08/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 01769 PACIFICA POLICE SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION 1 67824 84.00 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01758 SMC FIREFIGHTERS IAFF L2400-PAC 1 67825 1337.49 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01758 SMC FIREFIGHTERS IAFF Local 2400 1 67826 960.00 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01768 TEAMSTERS LOCAL #350 1 67827 2725.00 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01764 TEAMSTERS LOCAL #856 1 67828 17.32 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01766 VISION SERVICE PLAN-CA 1 67829 4013.15 12/08/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01766 VISION SERVICE PLAN-CA 1 67830 242.76 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 1 67831 100.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 67832 200.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 67833 100.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 00814 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 1 67834 396.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01767 NPFBA
1 67835 707.53 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01758 PACIFICA FIREFIGHTERS UNION Report: RECONCILE Generated: 12DEC22 14:37 Run: WEDNESDAY JAN0324 13:53 Page: 15

Page 9 of 10 ends

http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=&FileName=D:\GemsEnv... 1/3/2024

1.a
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Disbursements -FY 23-24 - 12-1 to 12-31-23 (5556 : Disbursements - Dated 12/01/23 through 12/31/23)

CITY OF PACIFICA
FOR: 12/01/23 - 12/31/23 CHECK RECONCILIATION BANK: ALL ALL

PAYMENT RECONCILE
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE CHECK STATUS TYPE DATE VENDOR # NAME 1 67836 458.50 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01758 PACIFICA FIREFIGHTERS-LTD 1 67837 840.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01759 PACIFICA POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 1 67838 210.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01760 PACIFICA POLICE OFFICERS SAVINGS 1 67839 420.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01769 PACIFICA POLICE SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION 1 67840 84.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01758 SMC FIREFIGHTERS IAFF L2400-PAC 1 67841 1337.49 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01758 SMC FIREFIGHTERS IAFF Local 2400 1 67842 2897.00 12/22/23 OUTSTANDING SYSTEM 01764 TEAMSTERS LOCAL #856 1 67843 39401.45 12/29/23 CLEARED SYSTEM 12/31/23 04608 TRI COUNTIES BANK BANK: 1 TOTAL # OF CHECKS: 372 FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT OF: $3350747.86 TOTAL # OF REISSUED CHECKS: 0 FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT OF:

TOTAL # OF ACH CHECKS: 0 FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT OF:

Page 10 of 10 ends

http://pac-gems/fms/BISystem/ReadROCFile.asp?sWC=C&iIdx=&FileName=D:\GemsEnv... 1/3/2024

1.a
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Disbursements -FY 23-24 - 12-1 to 12-31-23 (5556 : Disbursements - Dated 12/01/23 through 12/31/23)

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/8/2024
1 SUBJECT:

Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Move to approve the minutes for the following: (1) December 5, 2023 City Council Study Session and (2) December 11, 2023 City Council Regular Meeting.

STAFF CONTACT:

Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
650-738-7307
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

Move to approve the minutes for the following:
(1) December 5, 2023 City Council Study Session (Attachment A) and (2) December 11, 2023 City Council Regular Meeting (Attachment B).

FISCAL IMPACT:

Within budgeted operational expenses.

ORIGINATED BY:

City Clerk
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment A: Minutes of 12-05-2023 Open Study Session (PDF) Attachment B: Minutes of 12-11-2023 Regular Meeting (PDF) 2 Packet Pg. 18

CITY OF PACIFICA

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Community Center
540 Crespi Drive
Pacifica, CA 94044
Mayor Tygarjas Bigstyck
Mayor pro Tem Sue Vaterlaus
Councilmember Sue Beckmeyer
Councilmember Mary Bier
Councilmember Christine Boles
City Council Study Session 1 December 05, 2023
SPECIAL MEETING – STUDY SESSION
December 5, 2023 (TUESDAY) - 6:00 PM
www.cityofpacifica.org
Mayor Tygarjas Bigstyck called the meeting to order on December 5, 2023 at 6:12 PM 6:00 PM - OPEN STUDY SESSION
Mayor Bigstyck convened the special study session at 6:12 p.m.

Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Tygarjas Bigstyck Mayor Present
Sue Vaterlaus Mayor pro Tem Present
Sue Beckmeyer Councilmember Present
Mary Bier Councilmember Present
Christine Boles Councilmember Present
City Clerk Coffey took a verbal roll call of City Council. All Councilmembers present.

Staff Present: Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager; Deepa Sharma, Asst. City Attorney; Christian Murdock, Planning Director; Stefanie Cervantes, Sr. Planner; Brianne Harkousha, Sr. Planner; Sarah Coffey, City Clerk; Emily La, Dep. City Clerk.

Mayor Bigstyck recited the Lands Acknowledgment. Mayor Bigstyck led the salute to the flag.

CONSIDERATION

1. Community roundtable to discuss potential alternative modifications to the California Coastal Commission staff’s March 2023 suggested modifications to the City of Pacifica’s Certification Draft Local Coastal Land Use Plan (LCLUP).

PROPOSED ACTION: Receive a presentation from staff, observe the community roundtable discussions, and receive public input about potential alternative modifications.

Mayor Bigstyck introduced the Consideration agenda item topic and emphasized that tonight’s

2.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 12-05-2023 Open Study Session (5550 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Study Session 2 December 05, 2023
meeting is an opportunity to learn something new, share perspectives and listen to become conversant in new ideas being presented.

City Manager Woodhouse made initial remarks regarding this important topic for Pacifica, acknowledging that coastal planning is ordinarily a very complex and challenging topic and with factors of sea level rise adaptation becomes an extraordinarily complex topic, legally, environmentally, socially, politically and economically. He mentioned working on an earlier stage of the LCLUP Update six years ago in this room packed with community members and Councilmembes. Since then city staff has worked collaboratively with Coastal Commission staff to understand their perspective and to develop alternate policies to discuss tonight at the tables that City and Coastal Commission staff together think have the possibility of meeting both agencies interests and could result in a Coastal Commission Certified LCLUP that is also acceptable to the City. He stated that the tabletop discussions tonight will be captured in notes and observed by Councilmembers and will become part of the report that helps inform City Council decisions. City Manager Woodhouse commented on various ways to structure meetings for public engagement and encouraged focusing energy tonight to make the most of the structure of the meeting tonight to discuss and listen with neighbors about the topic, noting that tonight will help to inform the structure and content of the third public meeting of this threemeeting public engagement process for the LCLUP Update.

Planning Director Murdock then presented the staff report with an overview of the LCLUP Update process, introduction of alternative modifications, case studies and facilitator introduction. The presentation is be be followed by Roundtable Discussions, a Report Out from Roundtable Discussions and Public Comment.

Following the presentation, Planning Director Murdock introduced facilitator Cordell Wesselink from Community Boards, a San Francisco-based non-profit. Mr. Wesselink introduced the Roundtable Discussion format in tables of up to eight participants with a facilitator and notetaker at each, ground rules and discussion questions.

At 7:05 p.m. the meeting format transitioned to a break out session for Roundtable Discussions.

Following Roundtable Discussions, the meeting transitioned to reports out from each table summarizing key notes from the individual table discussions and feedback.

Facilitator Wesslink introduced the facilitators from each breakout table to provide a report out of the key summaries from each table discussion.

Table 3 summary: Concern that this is unrealistic and under-explained in terms of legality and the city capacity to do this plan. The hope is that the plan does get done, agreed to and settled with the Coastal Commission so the process that has taken so many years can come to an end.

Suggestions that there is a cost analysis and timeline of the SRA’s and the Sharp Park seawall and everything needs more information.

Table X summary: Concerns that there is a trust factor of the Coastal Commission. There is a lot to absorb and concern about understanding all of this. It feels like the Coastal Commission is taking away the rights of homeowners to do with they want with their property. It is not clear when 50% is triggered and what they can and cannot do. There is confusion about along the coast the different jurisdictions involved and who does what and not a unified organization.

Concern about keeping areas west of the highway natural and ability to build. Skeptical of perception of power grab by an entity that we don’t have any say over.

2.a
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 12-05-2023 Open Study Session (5550 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Study Session 3 December 05, 2023
Table 1 summary: Tranparency is important specifically about the California Coastal Commission: how they work and who they are and is there any way to connect them to this community in some way, if there are representatives that are responsible for this community could they be brought here to meet them. In terms of public information that is available about the plan, there is a real hope for concrete implications of this plan for me and my property and its value in the future in five years, ten years, one hundred years down the road including things like restrictions and deeds under this plan versus the 1980 plan in some likely scenarios. Table expressed general appreciation for city staff.

Table 8 summary: One of the major concerns was about the seawall: seawall or no seawall.

Also concerns about funding from where, how, a plan. Where is the plan and we need a plan.

Concerns about if there was a seawall built it is not good environmentally because the water coming around the side can still be destructive even with a wall. Citizens haven’t received enough information about the state of the coastline and would like to hear more from the Coastal Commission about what they are proposing and how amenable the Coastal Commission would be with the City’s proposals. Where does the underground infrastructure of Beach Boulevard fit into the LCLUP? There was a lot of concern around managed retreat process or policies. There is a fear that people are making an educated guess with no protection for the future when buying along the coastline. Suggest possibly getting people together from at-risk coastlines to discuss, as they want a plan. There is a question about whether a real professionals are being hired. There is a question about what are the alternatives and what if they can’t afford the alternatives. Someone wanted to know how involved is state and federal government in this issue.

Table 5 summary: Some concerns were why is the whole city on the hook for coastal property; what is the definition of incremental for SRA’s: is it cumulative since ’77 or by owner or by property; will the effect of the policies or triggers turn areas west of Highway One into a ghost town for commercial properties that gains no income causing costs that are hard to pay for moving the heavy infrastructure located there. Hopes are that they are happy that the Council is looking toward the future. Suggested changes are that the Council needs to lay it out in layman’s terms what they are proposing, who pays - be specific per property like a specific tax assessment for property. They were also wondering if the Coastal Commission will be amenable to the changes being proposed.

Table 6 summary: Concerns about the property owner losing control and the ability to get mortgages, insurance, who determines whether it is 25% or 50%, those type of things. The other concern is about damage versus expansion, for example if your kitchen burns down and you have some structural damage and have that looked at differently from expanding to five bedrooms from three. They thought the good was that it gives additional protections to the city from lawsuits because they felt everyone would share in paying those. They had a split opinion that the new policy does not impact owners in areas outside of the coastal zone as much. They also thought that it was great that the City and Coastal Commission staff worked together on something and that was really impactful not just for this but going forward, also. Suggestions:
be able to do repairs without triggering the percentage clause – don’t look at percentages if it is something that is just repairs, create HOA’s or special assessment districts for areas of higher risk, give the same protections to homeowners as trails and public amenities.

Table 7 summary: A question was raised about how does this align with Pacifica’s Housing Element – the State is saying there has to be a certain amount of new housing units built and will this hold that back? Concern about the impact of the infrastructure loss, holding erosion

2.a
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 12-05-2023 Open Study Session (5550 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Study Session 4 December 05, 2023
back – using plants and roots ahead of time, basically what technology works and what technology the Commission will allow and plan for that in the future. There is concern about transparency around the SRA’s – what makes an SRA an SRA, will new development be allowed in the SRA?
Table 12 summary: Concerns were that the Coastal Commission may not approve the SRA process. The hope was to seek different options and cost analysis. A suggestion is to look at alternative nature-based solutions and also respond to the 125 comments that were commented on at the previous session. A question is if no changes to the LCLUP and the City of Pacifica denies / no response, what happens next?
Table 11 summary: One of the biggest concerns was the feeling that there is a lack of time, need more meeting time to understand this as community members. This table had deep discussions about how other communities who live on the water are coping throughout the world, such as Amsterdam, London, Paris, New Orleans, Boston, New York. They are doing it, so why is it such an issue here on the coast – it is the Coastal Commission. The hope is to have technology are resources to solve these problems; we are right by Silicon Valley and Stanford and some of the smartest people in technology in the world, so let’s see if we can use their knowledge of resources. A suggestion was to see a presentation by Smart Coast. A question is how can the public be involved with the bidding process to see who is going to be the consultant to help guide us along.

Table 10 summary: Biggest concern was also the amount of time to study the plan; there was a feeling there was not adequate time either to study it or comment for whatever additional changes need to be made. There was a concern about the definition of the SSM, Substantial Structural Modification, in the SRA’s feeling it was too restrictive. There was not enough time to analyze to identify hopeful elements. In terms of changes they would like to see, they would like a return to the 2019 / 2020 SSM definition. Questions included what is the rationale for Sharp Park and Rockaway Beach being chosen as SRA’s and why is West Fairway Park not part of the SRA’s? The lumping of everything west of Route One was also a concern.

Table 9 summary: The most common concern was the need for more details, wanting more information on the implementation and structured outline. For hope, it was encouragement for development of new rights for building. Most common suggestion was for a simpler summarized version for review, an easier version to look over to read and understand, a plan to address strategies and identify beach protection – worried about erosion.

Table 8 summary: The main concern was how does this affect me specifically? There are two dimensions to that concern: specific address and what area does that put me in – in terms of the SRA, etc; the second dimenstion is once I know what area I’m in, it was then difficult to fully understand everything as there was so much information in the slides. The other concern was questioning whether we think this is the best deal we are going to get from the Coastal Commission and to we think we can get a better one?
Table X summary: Concerns included that this is eminent domain by a thousand cuts, it is a planned retreat – what does that verbiage say? It assumes defeat, basically give up, that is the way it is being presented. We are not being equipped to be empowered to actually direct what we want with our community and to support our Councilmembers to do that. Instead we are being presented with a firehose of things that scramble our brains and not representing our rights. We have plans submitted and that is what we liked; let’s stick to that. Why did it take a year to hear back that it was rejected? Suggestions – representation: there is a non-profit group

2.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 12-05-2023 Open Study Session (5550 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Study Session 5 December 05, 2023
called Smart Coast California that has had a record of success providing consultation for communities like us without a lot of finances and don’t know their rights. They charge half of the consultant fee to the community, which we could easily cover with about 5 tables of each person giving about $100 each, it is $3,000 for us and $3,000 for them. We are not ready to forfeit what we have spent our life earnings to acquire because we are being presented as if this is not negotiable and we don’t have rights over our property. Concerns about what is next, if this is something that is conceded, what is next? What happens to the people along the fault lines and their houses and what are they forced to accept? Lastly, who made those boundaries and why are those the boundaries?
Table 14 summary: There were many concerns, but the main concerns were with coastal access and if there is a plan to prevent neighborhoods blightness and deterioration. For hope, it is about working with the Coastal Commission and improving relationships. For suggestions, to provide cost analysis and more information on capital projects. For questions, having more information on zone changes and any potential funding analysis.

Table X summary: The biggest concerns were new development, existing development and infrastructure in those areas. We had to make it clear that it is not just the houses and businesses we are protecting, but the infrastructure and where our waste goes, etc. We still need clarification on what the Coastal Commission’s role is. What are the conditions of the area? We talked about visitor facing, which led to conversations about future hotels, economic sustainability which all comes down to some of these decisions. Sharp Park and Rockaway are major assets to Pacifica and we are all stuck in the managed retreat versus no managed retreat and “we want to develop everything” crowd and most of us are stuck in the middle. There were concerns about who is going to pay for this. They wish the presentation was a little more clear and in layman’s terms.

Table 16 summary: Everything they had from this table was touched on by others. In addition, the main concern was clarity, transparency, communication. A few good ideas at the table were providing more examples in the presentations, speaking about specific neighborhood or zones, and the effects on those neighborhoods. A point was made, before it can even be about specific issues or effects, just understanding what is happening as well as a feeling of trust and transparency and being straightforward about what is going to happen to you. Getting some questions at the table answered by the Planning Director and getting that clarity seemed to be very impactful
Overflow Room participants’ summary: Concerns were: all proposals need flexibility or mechanisms to adapt to changing forecasts, technology, conditions and solutions; each proposal and policy needs to clearly describe negative impacts and possible consequences; and negative impacts to insurance, mortgage and property values. For hopes: rebuild and/or maintain an optimal seawall along Beach Boulevard and Sharp Park Golf Course; it can develop a vibrant downtown; and public amenities / fresh approaches for ocean protection. Suggestions were: eliminate accumulation of percentile limits for maintaining or improving one’s home or property; no person should be forced to waive their liability or protection rights or city services.

Questions or other information that would be helpful: is there a better way, such as citywide referendum or vote, to protect freedom and choice of Pacificans than giving power to a small, unelected group – the California Coastal Commission; what is the negative impact of existing coastal, sea level protections?
Facilitator Wesselink concluded the reports out from the tabletop discussions and presented a QR code to provide feedback on how the Community Boards facilitators did this evening.

2.a
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 12-05-2023 Open Study Session (5550 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Study Session 6 December 05, 2023
Planning Director Murdock indicated that there will now be a public comment period.

Mayor Bigstyck opened public comment.

Remi Tan, Pacifica, stated that he questioned what the difference between the repairs and reconstruction, where repairs may be more than the sheathing but also get into the “bones” and may trigger putting people over even though they are just trying to repair and maintain their property. He stated that they also need to consider all the areas from the north of Pacifica to Pedro Point, and some of those areas are visitor-serving and potentially visitor-serving areas to account for all of that to make Pacifica the best we can and what we want as a community.

Mike Vernazza, Pacifica, stated his concerns about the state taking away the ability for generations of family and can no longer afford to inherit the family home due to property taxes.

He mentioned concerns about how to pay for all of these things and pushing back against entities that are forcing our town to do things that we can’t afford to do. He is concerned about the liability for those in the Manor zone according to the red line and the general viability of the town long-term.

Bob Boles, Manor District, Pacifica, stated that this is a very complicated subject and how much confusion there is and there is so little definition and complicated details, such as the concept of adding an addition to the house exactly how much can you do and how much you can’t do, the SRA zone and what it means if you are just a block away and the impact on individuals’ houses, which are their whole livelihood. He stated that he did not think this could be rushed.

Robine Runneals, West Sharp Park, Pacifica, stated that depending on what map you look at she is just outside of the SRA and she thinks that they have benefitted from protection which has allowed that historic district neighborhood to flourish and there is a potential for it to do greater things if allowed to do that. She mentioned economic development potential for the area, including the Pacific Coast Fog Fest along Palmetto. She stated a big concern for the future is insuring that event. She is concerned about if West Sharp Park becomes an SRA, what that will mean for insurability, finance, construction, and the impacts that it will have on the property and the businesses there. As a property owner, she feels that all areas deserve equal protection for their homes and the city’s infrastructure. She stated that she is willing to contribute to bring Smart Coast California to present to us and consult with us.

Dinah Verby, Pacifica, stated that there may be some good aspects to this proposal as well as a lot of drawbacks, but there is so much to digest that she doesn’t fully comprehend it and hopes that there will be another opportunity before the ultimate meeting to have more questions answered. She feels for the people who live in areas that might become SRA’s. She has concerns about the process and if we don’t end up with a certified plan, asked where are we.

She stated there may be state money under SB 272 for coastal resiliency projects that we need that we may not qualify for if we don’t have a certified plan. She had concerns about the time, cost and resources needed to fund this new process. She is concerned about the trade-offs involved with the SRA’s and the information in the staff report seems very vague.

Clif Lawrence, Pacifica, stated that he was perplexed by the staff report indicating under “Alternative Options” it listed none identified. He thought that meant we are throwing out what we had been offering the Coastal Commission before and this is the only option we have. He also asked what the precedent is for an SRA. He stated that we need to have an LCLUP and is

2.a
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 12-05-2023 Open Study Session (5550 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Study Session 7 December 05, 2023
willing to go with what the Coastal Commisison is asking for. He stated that we need clarity and to be able to explain this to someone without a college degree, how it is going to personally impact them and be able to answer their questions and suggested a format for answering questions.

Kim Finale, Pacifica, stated that she requests that they do not hire a consultant that can provide a non-biased assessment of the route they need to take.

Roy Earnest, Pacifica, stated that infrastructure that is not talked about much is the beach and he would like to see a coastal plan that includes a section on how our community plans to preserve the beaches we have and restore some of the beaches we have lost if that is possible through beach nourishment or other strategies.

Jim Kremer, Pacifica, stated that he saw the key foundational idea behind SRA’s is the SPD’s, the Shoreline Protection Devices, we call them seawalls, rip rap and berms, etc. The SRA’s are defined by the presence of a protective seawall or SPD. He pointed to an example of repeated wording in the document referring to maintenance or alteration of the existing SPD’s, but “existing” is a very fraught word in a legal sense and there is litigation around its meaning. He mentioned alteration, indicating that the compromise by the Coastal Commission offered to allow us to keep our existing seawalls and allow some maintenance and alteration of those existing seawalls, which sounds straightforward, but would like to know more clearly what those words actually mean – for example, mitigation with alteration. He would like more clarity and specificity on the definitions of these words.

Jeff Guillet, West Fairway Park, Pacifica, stated that he does not understand why West Fairway Park, which is a neighborhood a quarter-mile from the beach and 42 feet above sea level is not included in a carve-out and needs to be treated like it is right on the coast. He mentioned some confusion and disagreement with what the Coastal Commission says about SSMs, Substantial Structural Modifications, providing an example of impacts of the restrictions imposed by SSMs such as deed restrictions, indemnification of the city, impact on ability to obtain insurance, property values and causing blight. He mentioned a map used in the presentation showing encroachment of sea level rise in 100 years with a 100-year flood and all the sea level protections removed, e.g. the berm, stating that the berm exists and these Draconian restrictions are a big problem. He mentioned the concern about the Coastal Commission’s addition of 4-words, “… and tsunami evacuation areas” meaning the entired area is subject to these restrictions.

Richard Harris, San Francisco Public Golf Alliance, stated that he provided a letter regarding an inconsistency in the definition of the Special Resiliency Area in the plan submitted to the Coastal Commission, where Sharp Park, Mori Point, Sharp Park Golf Course and the southern part of the Sharp Park District are in a single Special Resiliency Area, but in the plan presented tonight does not have that same definition, stating the inconsistency is at Clarendon Avenue.

He stated he has mapped it in the letter and objects to the new district because of that inconsistency and more.

Kathy Moresco, Pacifica, stated that she is concerned about the deed restriction because it would apply if you remodel your property and almost everything in West Sharp Park is old. She stated if you buy a property there and you want to fix it up, make it better, you will first need to get permits and then you get a deed restriction that makes the property worthless and people will be hesitant to want to improve their properties if they are going to lose their value, the ability to get loans, financing or insurance for it. She thinks the deed restriction will hurt Pacifica’s

2.a
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 12-05-2023 Open Study Session (5550 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Study Session 8 December 05, 2023
ability to improve and be a better city.

Larry Bothen, Pacifica, stated that there can be no compromise on the October submittal. He thought the SRA’s are unacceptable, the entire city of Pacifica is a pre-existing use over which the Coastal Commission should have no jurisdiction stating that their demands are unfunded mandates with unacceptable consequences. He stated that right now the greatest threat to life and property is not sea level rise, but the Coastal Commission. He stated that we have the solutions to sea level rise – the new seawall connected to the golf course berm.

Ed Ochi, Pacifica, stated that he is concerned about the timeline for this plan, that it is the kind of plan that requires a good deal of assessment, review and evaluation and there are a lot of unanswered questions. He thought that making decisions at the third meeting without more time to discuss will lead to bad decisions. He mentioned concerns regarding some definitions that have not been fully spelled out. He stated that he heard discussions at his table and others that felt there was an “us versus them” factionalized feeling for different neighborhoods. He stated that more information needs to be provided on the cost implications. He emphasized that this is a city decision, not “us versus them” or a neighborhood decision.

Mayor Bigstyck closed public comments. Mayor Bigstyck thanked staff and the people who showed up to the meeting and that this was a really helpful step forward to making the best decision we can.

RESULT: NO VOTE REQUIRED

ADJOURN
Mayor Bigstyck adjourned the meeting at 9:43 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted,
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
__________________________
Tygarjas Bigstyck, Mayor

2.a
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 12-05-2023 Open Study Session (5550 : Approval of Minutes)

CITY OF PACIFICA

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Council Chambers
2212 Beach Blvd
Pacifica, CA 94044
Mayor Tygarjas Bigstyck
Mayor pro Tem Sue Vaterlaus
Councilmember Sue Beckmeyer
Councilmember Mary Bier
Councilmember Christine Boles
City Council Regular Meeting 1 December 11, 2023
December 11, 2023 (MONDAY)
www.cityofpacifica.org
Mayor Tygarjas Bigstyck called the meeting to order on December 11, 2023 at 7:11 PM 7:00 PM OPEN SESSION
Call to Order
Mayor Bigstyck called the meeting to order at 7:11 p.m.

Staff Present: Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager; Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney; Lisa Petersen, PW Director; Yulia Carter, Asst. City Manager; Christian Murdock, Planning Director; Maria Sarasua, Police Chief; Bob Palacio, PB&R Director; Bill Amable, Dep. Fire Chief; Louis Sun, PW Dep. Director-Wastewater Div.; Roland Yip, PW Dep. Director-Field Services/Engineering; Tara Schiff, Economic Dev. Manager; Sarah Coffey, City Clerk; Emily La, Dep. City Clerk.

Reading of Land Acknowledgment
Mayor Bigstyck read the Land Use Acknowledgment.

Salute to the Flag led by Mayor Bigstyck

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Proclamation - Susan Thaxton
Mayor Bigstyck read the proclamation recognizing Susan Thaxton’s retirement.

2.b
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 12-11-2023 Regular Meeting (5550 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 2 December 11, 2023
Councilmember Bier referred to her 39 years of service to Pacifica and thanked her for everything she has done.

Councilmember Boles stated that she toured the Wastewater Treatment Plant a couple of years ago and walked into her lab, and she found it amazing all she learned from that to be sure Pacifica stays healthy. She thanked Ms. Thaxton for her years of service and wished her well in her retirement.

Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated she is amazed at Ms. Thaxton's 39 years and thanked her for everything.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated she was thrilled when she first toured the Wastewater Treatment Plant. She stated that they appreciated Ms. Thaxton's help in guiding our process, keeping us in compliance, and her work was critically important. She thanked her for her years of service.

Mayor Bigstyck thanked Ms. Thaxton for making sure our environment is safe. He knows that, in addition to taking care of all of us in our environment, she is also intrinsically a good human being and it is his honor to offer this proclamation as well as thank her for all the work she has done in Pacifica.

PW Dep. Director Sun stated that PW Director Petersen and he would like to present a special token of thanks from Pacifica to Susan Thaxton for 39 years of service. He reiterated that she has had so many accomplishments in her 39 years and he pointed out that the laboratory is the most important part of their operation. They are thankful for her and are blessed to have had her serving and helping us throughout all those years.

PW Director Petersen stated that she has been amazing for operations as Lab Manager which is such an important and very critical role for them to be able to operate. She stated that she has done an amazing job for 39 years and congratulated her.

Ms. Thaxton thanked them for this honor. She stated that it has been a pleasure working for all these years in the longest temporary job in history. She stated that she had a lot of teamwork and they were able to produce much better quality of water for public health and environment.

She thanked them for the award.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Bigstyck asked if any Councilmember wanted to pull any items off consent, and seeing no one, opened public comments. He then closed public comments and asked Council for discussion, questions, or a motion.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Sue Vaterlaus, Mayor pro Tem
SECONDER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
AYES: Bigstyck, Vaterlaus, Beckmeyer, Bier, Boles

1. Approval of Disbursements for 11/01/23 through 11/30/23.

PROPOSED ACTION: Receive and file the Monthly Check Register Report for the month of November 2023

2.b
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 12-11-2023 Regular Meeting (5550 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 3 December 11, 2023

2. Approval of Minutes
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to approve the minutes for the following: (1) November 13, 2023 Special and Regular Meeting of the City Council and (2) November 27, 2023 Regular Meeting of the City Council.

3. Continuation of Proclamation of Local Emergency of the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the End of Beach Boulevard.

PROPOSED ACTION: Accept report and make a determination that conditions of local emergency continue to exist within the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard.

4. Continuation of Proclamation of Local Emergency at the Anza Pump Station.

PROPOSED ACTION: Accept Report and Make a Determination that Conditions of Local Emergency Continue to Exist at the Anza Pump Station at the Pacifica State Beach.

5. Frontierland Park ADA Improvement Project Award
PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt the Resolution to

1. Approve the Construction Contract with DRYCO Construction, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $99,994.00;

2. Authorize a budget authority in the amount of $133,437.10, which includes contingencies in an amount not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the Construction Contract amounts;

3. Authorize staff to execute future change orders not to exceed the contingency amount;

4. Authorize the City Manager to execute all documents related to the Frontierland Park ADA Improvement Project.

6. Resolution - Approve Purchase Agreement with C&D Power Inc for Purchase and Rental of Generator for Sharp Park Pump Station
PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution that:

A. Authorizes the City Manager to award and execute a Purchase Agreement for a new generator, including a 12-month generator rental, with C&D Power Inc.; and B. Appropriate $300,000 from Wastewater Fund 34 Sewer CIP fund balance to Sharp Park Pump Station R&R Project; and
C. Approves a total project budget of $335,789.63, including a 10% contingency of $30,500; and
D. Authorizes the City Manager to execute all documents related to the purchase and rental agreement.

7. Resolution - Approve Master Service Agreement with Centrisys CNP for Providing Centrifuge Services for the Calera Creek Water Recycling Plant PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution that:

A. Authorizes the City Manager to award and execute a Master Services Agreement with Centrisys CNP for a sole source purchase for providing centrifuge services in connection with the Calera Creek Water Recycling Plant biosolids handling process; and B. Approves a total project budget of $175,000; and
C. Authorizes staff to execute future task orders not to exceed the project budget amount.

2.b
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 12-11-2023 Regular Meeting (5550 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 4 December 11, 2023

8. Resolution Approving the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Pacifica and Townsend Public Affiars to Provide Grant Writing and Grant Administration Services to the Various Departments in the City of Pacifica
PROPOSED ACTION: Approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into a consulting services agreement with Townsend Public Affairs for grant writing and grant administration services at the not-to-exceed cost of $60,000.

9. Adoption of an Ordinance initiated by the City of Pacifica, to (a) add a new Article 53, “Emergency Shelters” to the City of Pacifica Zoning Regulations (Chapter 4 of Title 9 of the Pacifica Municipal Code [“PMC”]) to create zoning provisions for approval, construction, and operation of an emergency shelter consistent with the requirements of Senate Bill 2 (SB 2); (b) amend Article 11 “C-2 Community Commercial District” to make an emergency shelter with 20 or fewer occupants a permitted use and an emergency shelter with 21-30 occupants a conditional use; (c) amend Article 14, “O Professional Office District” and Article 15, “C-R Commercial Recreation District” to exclude emergency shelters; (d) update sections of the City of Pacifica’s Zoning Regulations to include updated definitions and terms for “Community Care Facility” and “Family Daycare Home” to be consistent with the requirements and definitions of State law; and (e) make other minor conforming revisions (File No. 2023-013, Text Amendment TA124-23). Recommended CEQA status: Exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15269 (Emergency Projects) and Section 15061(b)(3) (General Rule Exemption). The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Text Amendment by a Vote of 5-0 (with two absences) on November 6, 2023.

PROPOSED ACTION: Move to waive the second reading and adopt by title only “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Pacifica to enact a new Article 53 “Emergency Shelters,” to amend Article 11 “C-2 Community Commercial District,” to amend Article 14 “O Professional Office District”, to amend Article 15 “C-R Commercial Recreation District”, and to make various other minor conforming amendments of Chapter 4 Zoning, of Title 9 of the Pacifica Municipal Code (PMC), and finding the Ordinance exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (File No. 2023- 013; Text Amendment TA-124-23).”

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA
Delia McGrath, Pacifica, stated she wanted to speak about the Winter Solstice, the longest night of the year, and then expressed her concerns on the problems in Gaza and stated the Pacifica Peace People will be holding a peace vigil on the Winter Solstice and invited everyone to join them on December 21 at Rockaway Beach.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus attended the Council of Cities in San Bruno, the Elf Market, the Historical Society’s party at the castle, the tree lighting in Rockaway, the LCLUP study session, the Sanchez Art Winter Fair, the Channel 26 auction, and the Menorah lighting.

Councilmember Beckmeyer attended a number of the same events, i.e., the building lighting, the Elf Market, the tree lighting, the Historical Society holiday, and the Menorah lighting. She learned from CalCities that she was appointed as the Chair for the Coastal Cities Group for the coming year.

2.b
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 12-11-2023 Regular Meeting (5550 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 5 December 11, 2023
Councilmember Boles stated that many of them attended the holiday events. She referred to the meeting on the LCP update. She met with Marian Hinshaw from Pacifica Resource Center about their space needs and with Marj Davis about the county grant information. She met with Pacifica Spindrift Players with Economic Dev. Manager Tara Schiff and Management Analyst Alyssa Barranti about their programs and desire for growth and staying in our community. She met with the SFO Airport Roundtable and there is a separate technical working group that works to find small improvements and they approved some changes that mostly affect the cities near to airport about ground base noise. She stated that they will be talking about expanding the HUSH program. She and the Mayor went to the labor holiday party in Millbrae. She was also invited to the AAUW (American Association of University Women) holiday lunch at the Sharp Park Golf Course. She stated that the PCT auction was fun, and she answered some calls with the Pirates of Manor. She stated that they had a fun day at the San Mateo County Leadership training program and they played a game called SIMSOC: Simulated Society. She stated that the goal was to get everyone to survive and thrive and figuring that out. She stated that the best part was hearing everyone’s experiences and takeaways.

Councilmember Bier thanked Delia McGrath from the Pacifica Peace People for thinking about peace and uplifting the people of Gaza. She attended many different things and would report on some. She encouraged those who had not yet done so to fill out an age-friendly survey.

She stated Pacific Coast Television also has a survey on their website. She stated that she was the elf at the tree lighting, at Pacific Coast Television’s telethon, and in the future at the teacher housing of Jefferson Union High School District. She thanked everyone who came to the LCLUP community meeting. She attended the Coast Pride board meeting and they are starting to plan for the June 2024 Pride event. She went to the HEART (Housing Endowment and Regional Trust) board meeting. She thanked Cindy Abbott of the Sanchez Art Center for the Winter Fair they had in addition to their project for the community with the Pacifica Collaborative which is “Art for a Peaceful and Just Community”. She stated that PRC is still willing to accept gift cards and encouraged people to donate to the PRC as they are taking care of our families.

She gave a shout-out to James Coleman of South San Francisco for being the youngest mayor in San Mateo County.

Mayor Bigstyck wished everyone happy holidays and hoped they experience a happy new year.

He stated that Ukraine, Israel, and Gaza are persistently in his mind. He hoped joy prevails in all these places and many others worldwide. He attended the PCE surplus funds committee meeting, the San Mateo Labor Council lunch, Polarpalooza, the holiday party at Sam’s Castle, the tree lighting at Rockaway, the City of San Mateo reorganization, and the LCLUP meeting.

He planned to attend the reorganization in Millbrae. He attended the Jefferson Union High School District immigrant resources night and he strongly recommended city staff and PRC to table there next year. He attended the PCTV telethon with all councilmembers and did some phone banking with Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus. He also attended Hanukkah at the Community Center held by Chabad of Daly City.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Woodhouse referred to the Leadership Council of San Mateo County which Councilmember Boles is a member of the cohort for this year. He stated that he and Economic Dev. Manager Schiff had the opportunity to tour them around city facilities and look at potential meeting spaces for the Leadership Council to bring the cohort, which is comprised of leaders from all around the county, to Pacifica. He stated that was an opportunity that grew out of a meeting he had with the Mayor and their leadership about the Leadership Council. He stated

2.b
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 12-11-2023 Regular Meeting (5550 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 6 December 11, 2023
that his next communications are an end-of-year thank you and gratitude. He referred to the upcoming storm season, and they have members from North County Fire Authority, Pacifica Police Department, and Pacifica Public Works Department. He gave an advance shout-out to all the work that is normally done to prepare for the winter Public Works is doing to build our resiliency to storms, such as maintenance of pump stations and extra generators on hand. He thanked staff from the entire city but particularly Fire, Police, and Public Works who are ready to help us in those situations. He also wanted to give a shout out to the work and time staff spent on every agenda item and detailed Council report that is prepared and is the vehicle for all the information to inform the public and Council for the policy decisions that Council needs to make.

He stated that the preparation and trajectory for each of those Council reports can be very long and that it is an incredible workload that facilitates local democracy; we tend to not think about the 250 to 300 reports that are written every year to inform the decision making at our local level. Thus, he stated his shout-out is to all staff in every department that has touched and worked on those City Council reports, not to mention our incredible City Clerk’s Office for facilitating those reports to get posted in a timely fashion and meet all the noticing requirements and be available. He stated it is a great joy to participate in that process and deliver those reports. He stated that they are constantly working on improving the reports. He then referred to the Council who review all the reports and make decisions.

PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE

CONSIDERATION - NONE

SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS - CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION a. Outgoing Mayor's Remarks
Mayor Bigstyck welcomed County Supervisor Ray Mueller, Field Representative Katrina Rill from Congresswoman Anna Eshoo’s office, Field Representative Anthony Yoshida from State Senator Josh Becker’s office, and Field Representative Elise Lester from State Assemblymember Marc Berman’s office. He thanked them for being present, in addition to Executive Director Anita Rees from Pacifica Resource Center and Director of Government Affairs Mark Hershman from Peninsula Clean Energy. He stated that he is grateful they decided to let him serve in this position for the briefest of moments and was grateful for them entrusting him with this responsibility and he hoped he served them well in any measure. He stated that the only official duty as Mayor that particularly distinguishes him from his colleagues is the capacity to chair the meetings. As he was given the task, he has done his best to discharge that duty with the intent of harmonizing differing views and heightening the civility of discourse.

The other but no less distinguishing characteristic that he realized was the fact of the title itself, he spent most of the year making as many calls and attending as many events as he was possibly able to and to leverage his title into relationships that might serve our community once his title has been passed on per tradition. He stated that, over the course of this year, they have discussed homelessness, substance abuse, coastal erosion, Coastal Commission, surf camps, life buoys, short-term rentals, Manor Overcrossing, sea level rise, economic development, interagency land swaps, affordable housing, work force housing, market rate housing, the Roy Davies Trust Fund, paying for storm drainage to alleviate floodings, wetlands, wildlife, urban interfaces and the fire danger they bring, disaster preparedness, tsunamis, earthquakes, policing, trail management, committee and commission charters, augmenting clean energy, respecting native people, child care, elder care, quarry, trees, Housing Elements, libraries, sea walls, potholes and basic city services, and if not in chamber, certainly outside of them in community meetings, cafes, social media, and check stands. He stated that they also spoke

2.b
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 12-11-2023 Regular Meeting (5550 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 7 December 11, 2023
about neo-Nazism, as well as the proper way to address broken minds from outside of our community. He stated that, when he favored having the opportunity to contribute his voice to this table, it was based upon the premise that difficult decisions would be better served by civil discourse. He stated that, given the chance to govern, the solution of civil discourse seemed to come into focus as something having to do with kindness despite rudeness, compassion despite abrasion, and love despite liability. He thought these were the tenants that could more closely lean us in the direction of community, all within the context that the community entrusted in Council the opportunity to process through complex policy decisions in which our community must remain distinctly polarized because the Council cannot see the fullness and breadth of the ramifications present in their decision making and attempt to honor the robust nuances of a full spectrum appropriately. He stated that, in his time as mayor, he couldn’t be happier in his heart to be at the helm than he was on at the LCLUP meeting. He described a room filled with a full spectrum of concern over a deep, meaningful, in some ways terrifying, and in all ways contentious issue, which has resulted in literal screaming many times before, i.e., the Local Coastal Land Use Plan. They discussed it peacefully as a community. He suggests that, in moving forward, for the civility of that community meeting, discussion will be richer and more likely to yield productive outcomes for every member of the community for having engaged in an exercise of civility, for even a brief moment in the process that in other times devolved too quickly when they forgot they were best when they raise each other up despite our divergent world views. He stated that he has long suspected that our community can engage in conversation in ways they hear each other and can better tell Council their truths in ways they can hear them and make better decisions. He steps down with the wish that, as they move forward, they explore such approaches with all our hearts, as then product then yields better results no matter how much they disagree with Council or each other. He stated that, as he turns over the gavel, he leaves them with this thought, i.e., convictions of right and wrong can never build a better community, only love can do that.
b. Presentations to Outgoing Mayor
Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated that she is presenting the Mayor with a few tokens of their appreciation. The first is a photograph that is by Daniele Derenzi, a local photographer. The second gift is from the city which is a mounted gavel. Council also provided a small gift of a Cinemark gift card. The next gift is a succulent with a card. Council provided another gift of San Francisco family-friendly attractions for the Mayor and his family.

Mayor Bigstyck thanked them all so much.

Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated it was time for Council comments.

Councilmember Bier stated the first time she experienced time with him was on the Rent Advisory Task Force and she felt they have learned so much together along the way and she thanked him for that. She stated that there are so many things she appreciates about his leadership. One is that the community needs to understand that he went out and made lasting and important relationships with a lot of our regional leaders and he was able to bring people into our city who probably didn’t even know about the issues happening in Pacifica. He did a good job and his relationship building was key to the success of his leadership. She appreciated that and hopes the community does as well. She stated that it is a grace in which he responds and how he hears people. He gets every single question answered, and she thought that was a gift. She was grateful to him.

Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus stated that she has learned an amazing amount from him as she is a

2.b
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 12-11-2023 Regular Meeting (5550 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 8 December 11, 2023
very reactive person and he was very calm. His leadership helped the rest of them become better people. She stated that his relationship building has helped our city so much to go forward to let others know what Pacifica is about and understand what we are doing here and what we want to accomplish here.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated that his focus is so inspiring, whether it is a large issue like the sea wall or the Sharp Park Specific Plan or a very complicated issue. His focus is just as keen as when he is responding and focusing on an individual who has reached out to him, and she is very grateful to him for that. She stated that he is responsive to her, all Councilmembers and to the community, and he is thoughtful in the way he speaks, the way he expresses in open and closed meetings, and he just brings that presence to the moment. She stated that he has a very deliberate but thoughtful and loving kind of leadership and she was so grateful to him.

Councilmember Boles stated she has been involved in Council meetings for a couple of years and, when she was elected, one of the first things she did was to invite him over to her house.

She stated it is so difficult to have a relationship across the room when you can only talk for three minutes. She thought that was why the LCLUP meeting was so important to be face-toface. She stated that they had a good chat that day and started knowing each other. She appreciated his time. She stated the next thing he did was invite her to his home for a practice session in meditation which she thought was beautiful. She stated that she never thought about this before, being on the other end, such as how you lead a meeting. He looks and makes eye contact with them, and he is always checking in with them, not just waiting for them to push a button and have a light on, but a personal connection there. She stated, when she first started, City Attorney Kenyon told them that, when a new person comes on Council, it is a whole new Council; the dynamics can be different and that takes a while. She thinks they have done a beautiful job together. She knows they might not always agree, but that is where discourse and being able to bring new ideas and perspectives and being able to talk them through to choose what steps for the city, and she felt he has done that very well. She stated that he is also respectful to the public. They call in and speak here, and he looks them in the eye and tries to get their questions answered. She appreciates his philosophizing. She thought what was really special in their relationship is when they did get Zoom bombed, she and the Mayor partnered on that and met several times; it was about trying to find a solution where they were not letting awful people keep our public from being able to comment remotely and participate. They got a lot closer, sharing personal stories and understanding why it was so upsetting. She felt it takes time to get to that deeper relationship and she appreciates him taking the time for that as well.

She thanked him for not just running the meetings but also setting the agendas and being the spokesperson at every single city event.

Mayor Bigstyck stated, when it comes to energy management, he is a big believer in, especially when one is beginning a learning process, breathing one’s way into that learning process. He thanked her for acknowledging his thought and process.

Mayor Bigstyck then called for comments, recognizing attending dignitaries first, starting with San Mateo County Supervisor Ray Mueller.

SM County Supervisor Mueller stated that Mayor Bigstyck is known in the county for being so uniquely honest, sincere, dedicated, and thoughtful. What his colleagues said about his ability to forge relationships is so true, i.e., the work he does in Pacifica, bringing people to the city to understand the issues impacted in the city, as well as the work he does throughout the county and being so thoughtful, dedicated to details, and patient in those regional meetings, and being an example to other public officials in his thoughtful approach to that work and creating space

2.b
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 12-11-2023 Regular Meeting (5550 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 9 December 11, 2023
for others to share what they’re thinking. He is present on behalf of the Board of Supervisors with a certificate of appreciation to thank him for his work and congratulate him on a job well done in 2023. SM County Supervisor Mueller also addressed Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus. He stated that she showed how her inner strength surpasses all the weightlifting records she holds.

She becomes a role model in no way he thought she anticipated. He is in awe to what she can achieve when dedicated and focused on the service of others and she inspires him. He congratulated her.

Katrina Rill from Congresswoman Anna Eshoo’s office stated that it was wonderful to be present on behalf of Congresswoman Eshoo and thank the Mayor on her behalf for his great service as Mayor of Pacifica for the last year. She stated that Congresswoman Eshoo is representing Pacifica for the first time in her more than 30 years in Congress and she has loved the last year in collaboration with all of them including the Mayor and is thrilled to keep working with them for the next year and they can hopefully achieve some great things. She thanked the Mayor on Congresswoman Eshoo’s behalf, and she was bringing him a Congressional certificate of recognition for his service. She is looking forward to working with all of them next year.

Anthony Yoshida from State Senator Josh Becker’s office stated that he has known Mayor Bigstyck for his entire life, growing up in Pacifica and constantly seeing him around town. He stated that, on behalf of Senator Becker, it was nice to have a Mayor who fights so strongly for this town and goes out of his way to visit their office in Menlo Park to make sure Pacifica’s concerns are heard. It was nice to see Pacifica being represented so forcefully throughout the county and state, and they appreciate what he does for Pacifica. He wishes him best luck in the next year as a councilmember.

Elise Lester from Assemblymember Marc Berman’s office stated that she started as a field representative from Assemblymember Berman in April and Mayor Bigstyck was the first elected official she met with in her second week on the job. She stated that, immediately upon meeting him, her nerves were calm. She was immediately at ease and he explained things in a way that she immediately felt accepted and made her less nervous to ask questions of electeds. As Pacifica is a new part of Assemblymember Berman’s district, she reiterated what the other councilmembers said about him, bringing people unfamiliar with Pacifica into his ranks and making them feel welcome and heard. She stated on behalf of Assemblymember Berman, she congratulated him and they will miss him as Mayor and she wished Mayor pro Tem Vaterlaus the best of luck as well.

Mayor Bigstyck opened the public comments.

Martin Anaya of PCTV thanked all of them, and specifically thanked the Mayor as he thought Supervisor Mueller said it best when he said he gives people a space to be and express, whether it is the heavy issues they face with climate change, economic development, and all the issues in town. He thanked the Mayor.

Chris Redfield, Pacifica, thanked the Mayor for his excellent tenure as Mayor, and he stated it has been reiterated numerous times that he has a unique way and ability to reach out to our community and to everyone. He stated that Pacifica has unique challenges and will always work hard to rise to the occasion. He stated that the Mayor has shown he was prepared to do the work, built important relationships with local and state representatives, boards and commissions to aid in Pacifica’s future.

2.b
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 12-11-2023 Regular Meeting (5550 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 10 December 11, 2023
Mayor Bigstyck closed the public comments. He stated that he was rendered mostly speechless by what everyone has been saying and by the gifts, adding that he was here because he thought his voice may be helpful in some way which is the continuous hope. He stated that his voice would be worthless if not for his colleagues surrounding him, staff who puts their heart into the work for the community every day, and a community. He stated that he has a beautiful partner in the front row, Shari, for his renewed strength in a year that was a marathon. He couldn’t imagine running before he took on the title and doesn’t know if he could have had the strength if she had not been by his side through the entirety of the experience.

He also thanked Florence, sitting next to her, who challenges him on a daily basis to figure out how to be a better human being and help her to learn to be the same. He stated that it is beautiful to see the room filled with human beings putting their hand and heart in every element of their being to create the community they call home. He stated that it is his honor to be able to serve in any fashion that might be helpful and he thanked everyone for giving him the opportunity to make it happen. He stated that, rather than asking for a councilmember to move for a new mayor, he will take the liberty to make the motion. c. Selection of New Mayor
Mayor Bigstyck moved to appoint Sue Vaterlaus as Mayor; seconded by Councilmember Bier.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Tygarjas Bigstyck, Mayor
SECONDER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
AYES: Bigstyck, Vaterlaus, Beckmeyer, Bier, Boles
d. Selection of New Mayor pro Tem
Mayor Vaterlaus asked Council to make a nomination for a new Mayor pro Tem.

Councilmember Bigstyck stated that the way they generally do this is by the numbers and the conclusion he arrived at is that our next Mayor pro Tem would be Councilmember Bier.

Councilmember Bier asked if they can discuss that. She thanked him for that and for the community for the numbers. She stated that is how they do this and they ran in districts in the past election which is different. She would like to counter that offer as she believes that it is time for Councilmember Beckmeyer to be Mayor pro Tem, and there are many reasons for that thought. She stated that Councilmember Beckmeyer is in the position now regionally to lead and she loved it when Councilmember Beckmeyer was mayor.

Councilmember Boles stated she would also support Councilmember Beckmeyer as Mayor pro Tem. She stated that she never knew what the procedure was before and she would like to talk about that a little bit. She thought it was appropriate in terms of the vote when Council was voted on through the whole city where everyone was competing for the same votes. She thought they might want to rethink that policy as they move forward because different districts vote differently.

Mayor Vaterlaus agreed that how many people running in the district gets fairly complicated when you do it by district.

Councilmember Bigstyck stated that makes sense.

Councilmember Bier moved to appoint Councilmember Beckmeyer as Mayor pro Tem; seconded by Mayor Vaterlaus.

2.b
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 12-11-2023 Regular Meeting (5550 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 11 December 11, 2023
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
SECONDER: Sue Vaterlaus, Mayor
AYES: Bigstyck, Vaterlaus, Beckmeyer, Bier, Boles
e. Incoming Mayor's Remarks
Mayor Vaterlaus thanked them all for being here for such a great day. She has been in this chair before, but she is going to be different as she is a much more caring and compassionate person now. She thanked the current Council for the confidence for her to be the Mayor in 2024. She was trying to think of a word to describe each one of the Councilmembers and there were so many but she finally came up with a word for everything: Love. She stated they are here because they love Pacifica and they love each other and that is how they get things done here. They love staff, all the people who work for Pacifica. She thought it was amazing and everyone cares which is why they do it and continue to go on. She stated Council are the best, and we have the best staff as they have to deal with so many things. She would like to see a lot of the big things come to fruition when she is here, as it is her last year. She ran again to see these things be complete, i.e., Housing Element, Local Coastal Plan, moving staff back to City Hall, Beach Boulevard Resiliency Infrastructure Project, and so many big projects which they do on a daily basis. She also thanked her family and the families of all Councilmembers as it is an endless job they do constantly, and it was important to have family support or they wouldn’t be there. She stated that, like Councilmember Bigstyck, she would like them to continue to work together like they have and have the community to work with them as it makes it so much smoother. She stated they do not always have to agree. If more people from the public could get involved, she thought it would be great. She asked them not to wait until the end when really concerned about something but be involved. She thanked the community, Council, staff, and everyone for the support she has received during her journey back to good health. She stated it was important to her regarding how much support she has had, and she is going to be fine, thanks to everyone. She encouraged everyone to do mammograms and self-exams. She thanked them for being there.

ADJOURN
Mayor Vaterlaus adjourned the meeting at 8:49 p.m.

Transcribed by Barbara Medina, Public Meeting Stenographer.

Respectfully Submitted,
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
__________________________
Sue Vaterlaus, Mayor

2.b
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 12-11-2023 Regular Meeting (5550 : Approval of Minutes)

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/8/2024
1 SUBJECT:

Continuation of Proclamation of Local Emergency of the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the End of Beach Boulevard.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Accept report and make a determination that conditions of local emergency continue to exist within the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard.

STAFF CONTACT:

Roland Yip, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer 650-738-3767
[email protected]
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
650-738-7307
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

On January 22, 2016, the Director of Emergency Services proclaimed the existence of a local emergency along the Pacifica coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard due to El Nino storm activity. Extreme wave heights for extended periods of time caused top-of-bluff retreat at several locations along the Pacifica coast and damage to City infrastructure. Since this date, the Director of Emergency Services has proclaimed the existence of other local emergencies along this same stretch of coastline. These emergencies are described below:
• Failure of the sea wall and promenade on Beach Blvd. (in the vicinity of Santa Maria Avenue), which have been repaired, from the January 22, 2016 storm. • The 300 & 400 block of Esplanade experience episodic bluff erosion. In recent years (2016-2018), the bluff erosion has progressed to a point where the erosion is now threatening public infrastructure and utilities.
• Undermining of a seven-foot diameter storm drain outfall and concrete headwall for the discharge of Milagra Creek into the Pacific Ocean in the vicinity of 700 Palmetto Avenue from the January 22, 2016, storm. Construction is scheduled to restart in February of 2021 due to project delays.
• A failure of the seawall and promenade on Beach Blvd. in the vicinity of Santa Rosa Avenue and the Pier was discovered on December 16, 2020. Ocean waves, king tides, and high swells undermined a portion of the sea wall and created a large void (25’x25”) between the pier abutment seawall connection, affecting the sidewalk and promenade.

City staff and contractors stabilized and repaired the large void on January 22, 2021.

The sidewalk and promenade restoration were completed on February 22, 2021.

Monitoring of the repaired area is on-going.
3 Packet Pg. 38
Pacifica City Council 2
January 08, 2024
• On December 29, 2020, another failure of the seawall occurred approximately 150-200 feet north of the intersection of Beach Blvd. and Santa Rosa Avenue. A void, approximately 10’ deep by 15’ long, was found behind the seawall and was repaired with geotextiles and concrete slurry on January 5, 2021. Full restoration of this section was complete in February 2021. Monitoring of the repaired area is on-going. • On January 14, 2021, a combination of high tides and large waves damaged a forty-foot section of the Pacifica Municipal Pier’s west facing deck and concrete railing. Following this event, the Pier was closed due to safety concerns. City staff requested a structural engineering assessment of the above deck pier elements and a proposed repair and associated cost from a local engineering consultant. This information was provided to the City by the end of March 2021. The pier was reopened on April 2, 2021, but the damaged portion was fenced off for safety reasons. The City is currently moving forward with a repair project and is designing the repair. Construction will be funded by grant money provided through a Senate Bill 129. The City Council approved a resolution on December 13, 2021, to approve the application of the state grant funds for the repair of the pier and the application has been sent to the State Department of Parks and Recreation for processing. On May 13, 2022, the City received a Coastal Development Permit waiver from the California Coastal Commission to perform this work. A bid opening for the repair was held on June 9, 2022, and the City received one bid, which was $2 million above the project budget. Council rejected the bid and authorized the project to be rebid.
• In November of 2023, a failure behind the seawall was discovered at the intersection of Beach Blvd. and Salada Ave. A void approximately 40’ long and 12’-15’ deep (2’-7’ in width) was found behind the seawall and was repaired with concrete and cement slurry.

The final sidewalk replacement was completed at the end of December 2023. • On Friday, December 29, 2023, another failure behind the seawall was discovered at Beach Blvd. and San Jose Ave., and has been temporarily plugged and currently is being assessed.

The City Council first ratified this proclamation (Attachment 1) at its regular meeting of January 25, 2016. Since that date, additional damage had occurred along Beach Boulevard and Esplanade Avenue as noted above.

Pursuant to Government Code section 8630(c), the City Council must review the need for continuing the local emergency at least every 60 days until the City Council terminates the local emergency. Conditions of local emergency still exist since the City Council first acted to declare a local emergency on January 25, 2016, and since that time staff has brought the continuance of Proclamation confirming the existence of local emergency exists within the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard every 30 days with December 11, 2023, being the most recent.

The City is using a combination of city staff, contractors, and consultants to manage the discussed emergency work. Staff will bring recommendations to the Council to end the emergency designation for projects on the list once conditions stabilize and the projects are no longer in need of the emergency designation.

The City Manager recommends that the City Council make a determination that conditions of 3 Packet Pg. 39
Pacifica City Council 3
January 08, 2024
local emergency continue to exist within the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

ORIGINATED BY:

Public Works
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to End of Beach Blvd. (PDF)
3 Packet Pg. 40
"ATTACHMENT 1"

3.a
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to End of Beach Blvd. (5551 : Continuation of "ATTACHMENT 1"

3.a
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to End of Beach Blvd. (5551 : Continuation of

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/8/2024
1 SUBJECT:

Continuation of Proclamation of Local Emergency at the Anza Pump Station.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Accept Report and Make a Determination that Conditions of Local Emergency Continue to Exist at the Anza Pump Station at the Pacifica State Beach.

STAFF CONTACT:

Lisa Petersen, P.E., Director of Public Works
(650) 738-3767
[email protected]
Louis Sun, P.E., Deputy Director of Public Works - Wastewater (650) 738-4660
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

On Monday, March 16, 2020, the Department of Public Works received a report regarding a fire at the Anza Pump Station at Pacifica State Beach. After Public Works staff investigated the report, it was determined that the storm drain pumping system and roof/bathrooms were damaged during the fire. The engines were destroyed, and the pumps needed to be replaced.

The damage to the pump station threatened and continues to threaten the safety of persons and properties within the watershed due to the risk of flooding without an operational pump station.

The City of Pacifica’s Emergency Plan and Section 4-2.01 et seq. of the Pacifica Municipal Code empower the City Manager, acting as the Director of Emergency Services, to proclaim the existence of a local emergency when there is an actual or threatened existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and properties within this City.

The proclamation is subject to ratification by the City Council within 7 days, pursuant to the Pacifica Municipal Code. The proclamation of the existence of a local emergency further designates the City Manager or designated representative to act on behalf of the City for public assistance and for individual assistance for purpose of receipt, processing and coordination of all inquiries and requirements necessary to obtain available State and Federal assistance.

Additionally, pursuant to Section 3-15.09 (A) of the Pacifica Municipal Code, in cases of an emergency the City Manager is authorized to proceed at once to replace or repair any public facility without adopting plans, specifications, or working details, or giving notice for bids to let contracts. The City must comply with Public Contract Code Section 22050, which provides a process for City Council’s review of the emergency action if notice of bids to let contracts for public projects will not be given because of the emergency.

In this case, the City Manager has determined that the damaged pump station threatens the health and safety of persons and properties, including critical public infrastructure, which 4 Packet Pg. 43
Pacifica City Council 2
January 08, 2024
requires immediate attention and constitutes an emergency pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code section 4-2.02 and Public Contract Code Section 1102.

Such conditions are, or are likely to be, beyond the handling capability of the City’s services, personnel, equipment, and facilities, requiring the use of outside contractors to conduct emergency design and repair pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code section 3-15.09 without giving notice for bids to let contracts. Immediate action is, and continues to be necessary, due to the clear and imminent danger presented by any storm event that could occur during the time the storm water pump station is non-functional. Flooding could occur to areas upstream of the pump station, causing health and safety issues, as well as extensive property damage. As such, on April 8, 2020, the City Manager did proclaim the existence of a local emergency within the City and the need to continue the emergency action continues as the repair will take approximately 8-14 months or longer. The Proclamation of Local Emergency is attached to this staff report as Attachment 1.

City staff contracted with the civil engineering firm of Schaaf & Wheeler of San Jose, California to assist the City with the rehabilitation of the pump station. On July 13, 2020, the City Council approved construction services agreement for rebuild and re-installation of a pump and gear drive, the renovation of bathrooms, purchase and installation of new stainless-steel doors, and repair pump station wet-well grates. As part of the on-going maintenance for the pump station, staff purchased a new pump which was approved by the Council at the August 9, 2020, City Council meeting. An emergency purchase agreement with Herc Rental for a temporary rental engine was also approved on September 1, 2020, and will remain in place until the pump station is operational. On October 12, 2020, temporary measures were completed to allow for a nonstandard system of pumping at the Anza Pump Station until final repairs are completed. This work included a new pump, transfer switch, temporary roof, portable generator connections, and exterior double doors have been installed. Staff is continuing to evaluate and monitor storm water flows and purchased two new sump pumps to accommodate flows.

On May 10, 2021, City Council approved the purchase of two new Caterpillar engines utilizing the City’s established Sourcewell Cooperative Purchase Agreement. The rehabilitation plan is currently 100% completed, and staff has completed the engineering review. The roofing plan was approved by the Building Department. The City entered into an agreement with PG&E to tap the gas main and install a new gas meter.

During a storm event on the morning of December 16, 2021, the City experienced some flooding in the lower Linda Mar area due to the temporary nonstandard pumping system that has been in use at Anza pump station due to the fire damaged pump station engines in March of 2020. This temporary system has been in place because the City had been working to reach agreement with the California Coastal Commission on the remaining permitting requirements for the permanent pumping system. The City faced several significant stormwater related events from October 2021 through December 2021 and will face more with the continuing storm season. Replacement of this temporary system is considered an emergency and staff is moving forward with construction of the permanent system. To further improve operations between now and when the Anza Pump Station Repair Project is completed, the City recently purchased a small diesel engine that will be used to drive one of the existing smaller stormwater pumps, thereby improving pump station resiliency in the interim.

The City Council approved an agreement for DW Nicholson (DWN) to construct the Anza Pump Station Repair Project. Construction began on May 1, 2022. Ghirardelli and Associates were also approved to manage the construction work. The two new gas engines were delivered and installed in December 2022; the third new gas engine was installed in June 2023 and the new 2- inch PG&E gas service line for the new gas engines was completed May 2, 2023; All Anza Pump Station bathrooms were opened by August 25, 2023. Supply chain issues with the 4 Packet Pg. 44
Pacifica City Council 3
January 08, 2024
electronic controls and electronic control panel will delay the Pump Station for automatic operation until early 2024; however, City staff installed a temporary level control system in early December 2023. Startup and testing of new engine#1 have been completed and it is now in service. Peterson (the engine vendor) is currently startup and testing for engine#3 and #4, and startup work is estimated to be completed by January of 2024.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 8630(c), the City Council must review the need for continuing the local emergency at least every 60 days until the City Council terminates the local emergency. Conditions of local emergency still exist since the City Council first acted to declare a local emergency on April 13, 2020, and since that time staff has brought the continuance of Proclamation confirming the existence of local emergency at the Anza Pump Station every 30 days with December 11, 2023, being the most recent.

The City is using a combination of city staff, consultants, and contractors to manage the emergency work related to the Anza Pump Station repair project. The City Manager recommends that the City Council make a determination that conditions of local emergency continue to exist at the Anza Pump Station at the Pacifica State Beach. Staff will continue to update the Council on the progress of this emergency work monthly through the emergency declaration Council reports.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact to continue this local emergency.

ORIGINATED BY:

Public Works - Wastewater Division
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 19-2020 Ratifying Proclamation of Local Emergency at the Anza Pump Station (PDF)
4 Packet Pg. 45
RESOLUTION NO. 19-2020

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA

RATIFYING THE PROCLAMATION OF THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY AT THE

ANZA PUMP STATION AT THE PACIFICA STATE BEACH
______________________________________________________
WHEREAS, Section 4-2.05 of the City of Pacifica Municipal Code (“PMC”) designate the City Manager as the Director of Emergency Services; and
WHEREAS, Government Code section 8630 and PMC section 4-2.05(a) empower the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when said city is affected or likely to be affected by an emergency, subject to ratification by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Section 4-2.02 of the PMC defines "emergency" as the “actual or threatened existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within this City caused by such conditions as earthquake, hazardous materials, plane crash, landslide, tsunami, epidemic, flood, riot, fire, or other conditions, including conditions resulting from a labor controversy, which conditions are or are likely to be beyond the capability of control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of this City, requiring the combined forces of other political subdivisions to combat”; and
WHEREAS, Section 4-2.01 et seq. of the Pacifica Municipal Code empowers the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the City Council is not in session, subject to confirmation by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Manager is the Director of Emergency Services of the City of Pacifica; and WHEREAS, on Monday, March 16, 2020, the Department of Public Works received a report regarding a fire at the Anza Pump Station at the Pacifica State Beach; and WHEREAS, after Public Works staff investigated the report, it was determined that the storm drain pumping system was damaged during the fire and that the engine and the motors would need to be replaced; and
WHEREAS, the damage to this pump station threatens the safety of persons and properties within the watershed due to the risk of flooding that can occur without an operational pump station; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has determined that the damaged pump station threatens the health and safety of persons and properties, including critical public infrastructure due to the risk of flooding and requires immediate attention and repair and as such constitutes an emergency pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code section 4-2.02 and Public Contract Code section 1102; and WHEREAS, such conditions are beyond the handling capability of the City’s services, personnel, equipment, and facilities, requiring the use of outside contractors to conduct emergency repair pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code section 3-15.09 without giving notice for bids to let contract, ATTACHMENT 1

4.a
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 19-2020 Ratifying Proclamation of Local Emergency at the Anza Pump Station (5546 : Continuance pursuant to Public Contract Code 22050; and
WHEREAS, on April 8, 2020, the City Manager, in his capacity as Director of Emergency Services, proclaimed the existence of local emergency in the City of Pacifica, after determining that the damaged condition of the Anza Pump Station is likely to create conditions of disaster or extreme peril which will be beyond the services, personnel and equipment and facilities of the City; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code section 8630 and PMC section 4-2.05(a) the City Council must take action to confirm the proclamation within 7 and in accordance with Public Contract Code section 22050 which requires confirmation by 2/3 of Council within 14 days of the emergency action.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said Proclamation of Existence of Local Emergency, as issued by said City Manager in his capacity as Director of Emergency Services, which is attached hereto as Attachment “A”, is hereby ratified and approved by the City of Pacifica City Council.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said local emergency is confirmed to exist and shall be deemed to continue to exist until its termination is proclaimed by the City Council of the City of Pacifica.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that during the existence of this local emergency, the powers, functions and duties of the Director of Emergency Services, and the emergency organization of the City of Pacifica shall be those prescribed by state law, by the existing ordinances and resolutions of the City of Pacifica, as well as this resolution and any subsequent emergency orders of the City Council. • • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 13th day of April 2020, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers: Martin, Beckmeyer, Vaterlaus, Bier, O’Neill NOES, Councilmembers: None.

ABSENT, Councilmembers: None.

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers: None.

CITY OF PACIFICA
Deirdre Martin, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ______________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney

4.a
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 19-2020 Ratifying Proclamation of Local Emergency at the Anza Pump Station (5546 : Continuance

PROCLAMATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, Section 4-2.01 et seq. of the Pacifica Municipal Code empowers the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the City Council is not in session, subject to confirmation by the City Council at the earliest possible time; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager is the Director of Emergency Services of the City of Pacifica; and WHEREAS, on Monday, March 16, 2020, the Department of Public Works received a call regarding a fire at the Anza Pump Station at the Pacifica State Beach; and WHEREAS, after Public Works staff investigated, and determined that the storm drain pumping system was damaged during the fire; and
WHEREAS, the damage to the pump system threatens the safety of persons and property, including critical public infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, such conditions are or are likely to be beyond the handling capabilities of the City’s services, personnel, equipment, and facilities, requiring the use of outside contractors to conduct emergency repair; and
WHEREAS, the City provides this written notification to the San Mateo County and State CalEMA’s Regional and Headquarter offices of a proclamation of local emergency; and WHEREAS, such proclamation shall be subject to confirmation by the Pacifica City Council at the earliest possible time.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that, in accordance with State Law and the City of Pacifica Municipal Code, the Director of Emergency Services proclaims the existence of a local emergency for the Anza Pump Station.

DATED: April 8, 2020
By:_____________________________
Kevin Woodhouse
Director of Emergency Services
Attachment 1

4.a
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 19-2020 Ratifying Proclamation of Local Emergency at the Anza Pump Station (5546 : Continuance

4.a
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 19-2020 Ratifying Proclamation of Local Emergency at the Anza Pump Station (5546 : Continuance

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/8/2024
1 SUBJECT:
2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act Development Fee Review
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica Approving 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023.” STAFF CONTACT:

Yulia Carter, Assistant City Manager
650-501-6004
[email protected]
Lisa Petersen, Public Works Director
650-738-3767
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The City of Pacifica, like many other local agencies, levies fees on new development within the City in order to fund public capital improvements necessitated by such development (Development Fees). In 1987 the State enacted Assembly Bill No. 1600, adding Section 66000 et seq. to the Government Code, commonly known as AB 1600 or the Mitigation Fee Act. The Mitigation Fee Act imposes certain accounting and reporting requirements on local agencies that collect Development Fees. The proposed action before the City Council is designed to ensure that the City complies with the accounting and reporting requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act.

1. A local jurisdiction must follow the process to make certain determinations regarding the purpose and use of the fees and to establish a “nexus” or connection between a development project and the public improvement being financed with the fee.

2. The fee revenue must be segregated from the general fund in order to avoid commingling of public improvement fees and the general fund.

3. If a local jurisdiction has had possession of a development fee for five years or more and has not committed that money to a project or actually spent that money, then it must make findings describing the continuing need for that money each fiscal year after the five years has expired.

4. If a local jurisdiction cannot make the findings required under paragraph 3, then the City must go through a refund procedure.

The City of Pacifica’s Municipal Code authorizes collection of the following Development Fees covered by the Mitigation Fee Act:
• Traffic Impact Mitigation Improvement Fees for Highway One Improvements (Chapter 15,Title 8) - Fund 12
• Traffic Impact Mitigation Fees for the Improvement of the Manor Drive/Palmetto 5 Packet Pg. 50
Pacifica City Council 2
January 08, 2024
Avenue/Oceana Boulevard Intersection (Chapter 18, Title 8) - Fund 14 • Planned Drainage Facilities Fees (Article 1, Chapter 4, Title 7) - Fund 19 • Capital Projects Fees (Article 2, Chapter 4, Title 7) - Fund 22 • In-Lieu Parking Facilities Fee (Resolution No. 17-86, amended April 27, 2020 by Resolution 23-2020) - Fund 25
• Dedications and Fees for Park and Recreational Purposes (Chapter 19, Title 8) - Fund 26
• Sewer Connection Charges, (Article 1, Chapter 11, Title 6) - Fund 34 • Street Improvement Fee, (Section 214, Article 2, Chapter 2, Title 7 and Chapter 21, Title 8) - Fund 13
• Housing In-Lieu Fee (Resolution No. 24-2007)
• Tree In-Lieu Fee (Section 4-12-23, Chapter 12, Title 4) - Fund 29 The Mitigation Fee Act mandates that for accounting purposes, Development Fees and related interest must be accounted for separately and used only for the purposes for which the Development Fees were collected. The City tracks Development Fee activity through dedicated revenue accounts and specific expenditure allocations to appropriate projects.

Mitigation Fee Act Reporting Requirements
The Mitigation Fee Act requires that, within 180 days after the close of the fiscal year, the City must make available to the public the following information regarding each of its Development Fee funds:
• A brief description of the type of Development Fee in the fund. • The amount of the Development Fee.
• The beginning and ending fund balance for the fiscal year. • The amount of Development Fees collected and interest earned. • An identification of each public improvement on which Development Fees were expended together with the amount of such expenditures. • Information regarding the schedule for commencement of certain public improvements to be funded with Development Fees.
• A description of any inter-fund transfers or loans made from the fund. • The amount of any refunds made.

To comply with these requirements, staff has prepared the attached Mitigation Fee Act Annual Report of Development Fees. Pursuant to the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act, this report is being presented to the City Council for review at a regularly scheduled public meeting not less than 15 days after the information was made available to the public. The 2022-2023 report was filed with the City Clerk’s office and made available for public review on December 21, 2023.

In addition, notice of the time and place of this meeting must be mailed at least 15 days prior to the meeting to all interested parties who filed a written request for such a notice. The City has received no such requests for notice.

Findings Regarding Unexpended Fees
For the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the fund, and every five years thereafter, the City is required to make certain findings with respect to that portion of the fund remaining unexpended, whether committed or uncommitted. Gov. Code § 66001(d)(1). The findings are:
• The purpose to which the Development Fee is to be put. • There is a reasonable relationship between the Development Fee and the purpose for 5 Packet Pg. 51
Pacifica City Council 3
January 08, 2024
which it is charged.
• Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements to be funded by the Development Fee. • Designate the approximate date on which the financing of the incomplete improvements will be complete.

Staff prepared a five-year analysis of the development fees. Staff finds that the purpose for each Development Fee is sufficiently described in the attached report. In addition, the original nexus study creating or amending the fee establishes the reasonable relationship between the Development Fee and the purpose for which it was created, the other sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete the financing of the projects where the Development Fee are part of the funding and the approximate dates on which the financing of the incomplete improvements will be completed are outlined in the City’s CIP budget each year.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

No alternative action has been identified for the approval of the 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act Annual Report of Development Fees.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

Approval of the 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 is consistent with the following Council adopted Goals:
• Enhance organizational and fiscal stability: the mitigation fees provide vital financing mechanism for City infrastructure.
• Improve and steward City infrastructure, streets and facilities: The mitigation fees assist in the development and improvement of City infrastructure.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. All development impact fees collected to date have been committed or expended and are not subject to refund.

ORIGINATED BY:

Public Works
ATTACHMENT LIST:
2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (PDF)
5 Packet Pg. 52
Pacifica City Council 4
January 08, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. __-2024

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA APPROVING THE 2022-2023 ANNUAL AND FIVE-YEAR IMPACT FEE REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2023
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 66000 et seq., the City of Pacifica is required to prepare an annual report regarding development impact fees within 180 days after the close of each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, Staff has prepared the 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A (“Impact Fee Report”), and incorporated by reference, which satisfies the reporting requirements stated in the Mitigation Fee Act; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 66006(b)(2), the Impact Fee Report has been available for public review at the Clerk’s office since December 21, 2023; and WHEREAS, the City imposes development fees that are subject to the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code §§ 66000 et seq.): the Traffic Impact Mitigation Improvement Fees for Highway One Improvements, the Traffic Impact Mitigation Fees for the Improvement of the Manor Drive/Palmetto Avenue/Oceana Boulevard Intersection, the Planned Drainage Facilities Fees, the Capital Projects Fees, the In-Lieu Parking Facilities Fee, the Park Facilities Impact Fee, the Sewer Connection Charges, the Street Improvement Fee, the Housing In-Lieu Fee, and the Tree In-Lieu Fee; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 66001(d) requires a local agency to make findings with respect to any unexpended funds for the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the account or fund; and
WHEREAS, staff prepared a five-year analysis of the development fees. Staff finds that the purpose for each Development Fee is sufficiently described in the attached report. In addition, the original nexus study creating or amending the fee establishes the reasonable relationship between the Development Fee and the purpose for which it was created, the other sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete the financing of the projects where the Development Fee are part of the funding and the approximate dates on which the financing of the incomplete improvements will be completed are outlined in the City’s CIP budget each year.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pacifica as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. The Council hereby approves, accepts, and adopts 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and makes the findings set forth in this resolution.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Pacifica finds as follows:
5 Packet Pg. 53
Pacifica City Council 5
January 08, 2024

1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66000 et seq., the City has conducted an annual and five-year review of its development impact fees and the Council has reviewed the Impact Fee Report for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023.

2. The funds have been and shall be used for the purposes stated in said report and are necessary to mitigate impacts resulting from development in the City and there is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees and the type of development project upon which the fee is imposed.
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 8th day of January, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:

Sue Vaterlaus, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ______________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 5 Packet Pg. 54
4880-6649-6405 v1
Path of Portola 1769 • San Francisco Bay Discovery Site City of Pacifica
170 Santa Maria Avenue
Pacifica, CA 94044
City of Pacifica
Annual and Five-Year Impact
Fee Report
For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023

5.a
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 4880-6649-6405 v1
Path of Portola 1769 • San Francisco Bay Discovery Site Table of Contents
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL........................................................................................................I CITY COUNCIL AND ELECTED OFFICIALS ............................................................................. II INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................... 1 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORTING ........................ 1 ANNUAL REPORT - CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66006(b)...................... 1 FIVE-YEAR REPORT - CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(d) ................. 2

DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES, IDENTIFICATION OF PURPOSE OF FEES, AND

REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEE AND THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS CHARGED ................................................................................................................................................. 3 CURRENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULES ................................................................................... 7 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT............................................................................... 12 STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE....... 12 HIGHWAY 1 IMPROVEMENTS.............................................................................................. 13 MANOR DRIVE/PALMETTO AVENUE/OCEANA BOULEVARD INTERSECTIONS............... 14

PLANNED DRAINAGE FACILITIES FEES AND RESERVE FOR DRAINAGE FACILITY CONSTRUCTION FUNDS................................................................................................................................... 15 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS ............................................................................................... 16 IN-LIEU PARKING FACILITIES FEE...................................................................................... 17 PARK FACILITIES IMPACT FEE............................................................................................ 18 SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES ....................................................................................... 19 STREET IMPROVEMENT FEE.............................................................................................. 20 STREET IMPROVEMENT FEE .............................................................................................. 21 HOUSING IN-LIEU FEE ......................................................................................................... 22 TREE IN-LIEU FEE ................................................................................................................ 23

5.a
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report i
4880-6649-6405 v1
January 8, 2024
The Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council and Citizens of Pacifica Dear Mayor, Members of the City Council and Citizens of Pacifica:

State law requires any local agency that imposes development impact fees to prepare an annual report providing specific information about those fees. Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of the California Government Code Section 66006(b) and 66001(d), as amended by Assembly Bill (AB) 518 and Senate Bill (SB) 1693, I hereby submit the Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report for the City of Pacifica, California for the fiscal year (FY) ended June 30, 2023.

Development impact fees are charged by local governmental agencies in connection with approval of development projects. The purpose of these fees is to defray all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to the development project. The legal requirements for enactment of a development impact fee program are set forth in Government Code §§ 66000‐66025 (the "Mitigation Fee Act"), the bulk of which was adopted as 1987’s AB 1600 and thus commonly referred to as “AB 1600 requirements”.

In Pacifica, development impact fees are collected at the time a building permit is issued for the purpose of mitigating the impacts caused by new development on the City’s infrastructure. Fees are used to finance the acquisition, construction and improvement of public facilities needed as a result of this new development.

State law requires the City prepare and make available to the public the Development Impact Fee Report within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year. The City Council must review the annual report at a regularly scheduled public meeting not less than fifteen days after the information is made available to the public. A draft of this report was filed with the City Clerk’s office and available for public review on December 21, 2023.

Respectfully submitted,
Yulia Carter
Assistant City Manager/Director of Finance

CITY OF PACIFICA
170 Santa Maria Avenue • Pacifica, California 94044-2506 www.cityofpacifica.org
MAYOR
Sue Vaterlaus

MAYOR PRO TEM
Sue Beckmeyer

COUNCIL
Mary Bier
Tygarjas Bigstyck
Scenic Pacifica Christine Boles
Incorporated Nov. 22, 1957

5.a
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report ii
4880-6649-6405 v1

CITY OF PACIFICA, CALIFORNIA

SUE VATERLAUS
Mayor

SUE BECKMEYER
Mayor Pro Tem

MARY BIER

TYGARJAS BIGSTYCK

CHRISTINE BOLES
Members of City Council

KEVIN WOODHOUSE
City Manager

MICHELLE MARCHETTA KENYON
City Attorney

OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS

YULIA CARTER

CHRISTIAN MURDOCK
Assistant City Manager/Director of Finance
Director of Planning
MARIA SARASUA Police Chief
RON MYERS Fire Chief
LISA PETERSEN Director of Public Works
BOB PALACIO Director of Parks, Beaches & Recreation
SARAH COFFEY City Clerk

OFFICIAL COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES

BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS & SAFETY COMMISSION

OPEN SPACE AND PARKLAND ADVISORY COMMITTEE

PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION COMMISSION

PLANNING COMMISSION

5.a
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 1
4880-6649-6405 v1

INTRODUCTION

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORTING In California, State legislation sets certain legal and procedural parameters for the charging of development impact fees. This legislation was passed as AB1600 by the California Legislature and is now codified as California Government Code Sections 66000 through 66008 (“Mitigation Fee Act”). This State law went into effect on January 1, 1989.

The Mitigation Fee Act imposes certain accounting and reporting requirements with respect to the fees collected.

The fees must be deposited in a special account to avoid commingling the fees with the City’s other revenues or funds. Interest on each development fee fund or account must be credited to that fund or account and used only for those purposes for which the fees were collected.

The Mitigation Fee Act also requires any local agency that imposes development impact fees to prepare an annual report and a five-year report that provide specific information about those fees. This report serves both of those functions and has been prepared for the City of Pacifica for the fiscal year (FY) ended June 30, 2023 in accordance with the provisions of the California Government Code Section 66006 (b) and 66001 (d).

ANNUAL REPORT - CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66006(b) Pursuant to Government Code 66000 et seq. and specifically Government Code section 66006(a), the City is required to prepare an annual report regarding any fee imposed to provide for an improvement to be constructed to serve a development project, or which is a fee for public improvements within the meaning of subdivision (b) of Section 66000, and that is imposed by the local agency as a condition of approving the development project.

California Government Code Section 66006(b) defines the specific reporting requirements for local agencies that impose AB 1600 development impact fees on new development. Specifically, Section 66006 (b) requires that for each separate fund the local agency shall make available to the public the information shown below for the most recent fiscal year.
• A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund (pages 3 to 6). • The amount of the fee (pages 7 to 11).
• The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund (pages 13 to 23). • The amount of the fees collected, and interest earned (pages 13 to 23). • An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees (pages 13 to 23).
• An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement (pages 13 to 23).
• A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan (pages 2).

5.a
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 2
4880-6649-6405 v1
• The amount of refunds made due to sufficient funds being collected to complete financing on incomplete public improvements, and the amount of reallocation of funds made due to administrative costs of refunding unexpended revenues exceeding the amount to be refunded (pages 2).

City Actions Regarding this Section:
• For the 2022-2023 fiscal year the City did not provide any refunds of development fees. • For the 2022-2023 fiscal year a transfer from Park Facilities Impact Fee fund to Roy Davies Trust fund to fund the Playground Equipment Improvement Project.

FIVE-YEAR REPORT - CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(d) For all funds established for the collection and expenditure of development impact fees, California Government Code Section 66001(d) has additional requirements. For the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the fund and every five years thereafter, the local agency shall make all of the following findings with respect to that portion of the fund remaining unexpended, whether committed or uncommitted:
• Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put.
• Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and purpose for which it is charged. • Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements.
• Designate the approximate dates on which the funding is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.

City Actions Regarding this Section:
• For the 2022-2023 fiscal year the City reviewed the 5-Year Funds and there are no actions to report.

State law requires the City to prepare and make available to the public the above information within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year. The City Council must review the annual report at a regularly scheduled public meeting not less than fifteen days after the information is made available to the public. This report was filed with the City Clerk’s office and available for public review on December 21, 2023.

5.a
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 3
4880-6649-6405 v1

DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES, IDENTIFICATION OF PURPOSE OF FEES, AND

REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEE AND THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS CHARGED 66006(b)(1)(A), 66013(d)(1), and 66001(d)(1)(A) and (B) The City has ten (10) development impact fees.

1. Highway 1 Improvement Fund. Fees are imposed on private development projects pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code (Traffic Impact Mitigation Improvement Fund for Highway One Improvements, Chapter 15, Title 8, as added by Ordinance No. 318-C.S.). The purpose of the Highway 1 impact mitigation fee is to defray the actual or estimated costs of constructing improvements to Highway One in the City from Westport Drive south to the southern City limits, which improvements will be required to accommodate the increased traffic flow in the area resulting from future development in the City.

The fee amount collected is based on the traffic generated by the respective development, measured by the square footage of the new development, and the new development’s proportionate cost to construct the improvements required to serve the traffic generated by the new development. In addition, the traffic impact mitigation fee is imposed in two impacting areas. The primary impacting area is that area lying south of Sharp Park Road. The secondary impact area is that area lying north of Sharp Park Road. The fee is imposed on new residential, commercial, and retail development.

2. Manor Drive Improvement Fund. The Manor Drive/Palmetto Avenue/Oceana Boulevard Intersections Improvement Fees are imposed on private development projects pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code (Traffic Impact Mitigation Fees for the Improvement of the Subject Intersection, Chapter 18, Title 8, as added by Ordinance No. 422-C.S.). The purpose of establishing traffic impact mitigation fees is to defray the actual costs of constructing improvements to the Manor Drive/Palmetto Avenue/Oceana Boulevard intersection, which improvements will be required to accommodate the increased traffic flow in the area resulting from future building activity in the City.

The fee amount collected is based on the traffic generated by the respective development uses and the estimated cost to construct the required improvements. The traffic impact mitigation fee is imposed on the areas lying north of Paloma Avenue within the Pacifica City limits. The fee is imposed on new residential, commercial, and retail development.

3. Planned Local Drainage Fund. The Planned Drainage Facilities Fee is imposed on private development projects pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code (Article 1, Chapter 4, Title 7, as added by Ordinance No. 333-C.S.). The purpose of the Local Drainage impact mitigation fee is to defray the actual or estimated cost of constructing planned drainage facilities for the removal of surface and storm drainage waters to accommodate the increased drainage needs resulting from future development in the City.

The fee amount collected is based on the required storm water drainage improvements generated by the respective development, measured by the location and acreage of the new development, and the new development’s proportionate cost to construct the improvements required to serve the increased use generated by the new development. The fee is imposed on new residential, commercial, and retail development.

4. General Capital Improvement Fund. The Capital Improvements Fees are imposed on private development projects pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code (Capital Projects Fund, Article 2, Chapter 4, Title 7, as added by Ordinance No. 7-C.S.). The purpose of the General Capital Improvement impact

5.a
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 4
4880-6649-6405 v1
mitigation fee is to defray the actual or estimated cost of constructing new public safety facilities to accommodate the increased service needs resulting from future development in the City. The fee is used to develop capital programs and to provide for the capital outlays necessary to provide added services and facilities as a result of such new construction, and to safeguard life, limb, and the public health and safety.

The fee amount collected is based on the estimated cost to construct the required capital improvements for new residential, commercial, and retail development, measured by the number of bedrooms or hotel or motel units or the permit valuation of the new development, and the new development’s proportionate costs to construct the improvements required to serve the increased use generated by the new development. It is to be used for the acquisition, construction, and improvement of major capital facilities of the City.

5. In-Lieu Parking Facilities Fee. The In-Lieu Parking Facilities Fee is imposed on private development projects in Rockaway Beach and Sharp Park areas. The purpose of the Rockaway Beach and Sharp Park In-Lieu Parking Fee is to provide additional public parking at West Rockaway Beach and West Sharp Park consistent with the goals of the Rockaway Beach and Sharp Park Specific Plan to encourage shared parking facilities and accommodate the increased demand for parking resulting from future development in the Rockaway Beach and Sharp Park areas.

The fee amount collected is based on the fee update study adopted by City Council Resolution No. 23- 2020 on April 27, 2020, and the approximate cost of constructing a parking space in an above grade parking structure.

6. Parks Facilities Impact Fee. The Park Facilities Impact Fee is imposed on private residential development projects pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code (Park Facility Impact Fee Chapter 19, Title 8).

The purpose of the Parks Facilities impact fee is to defray the actual or estimated cost of constructing additional parks, recreational facilities, and open spaces to accommodate the increased needs resulting from future development in the City.

The fee amount collected is based on the increase in use of parks, recreational facilities, and open spaces generated by the respective development, measured by the number of residents due to residential construction, and the new development’s proportionate cost to construct the required recreational facilities and purchase the needed land and open space.

7. Sewer Facility Construction Fund. The Planned Sanitary Sewer Facilities Fee is imposed on private development projects pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code (Sewer Connection Charges, Chapter 11, Title 6). The purpose of the Sewer Facility capacity fee is to defray the actual or estimated cost of acquisition, construction, and operation of City sanitation and sewage facilities to accommodate the increased use of the facilities resulting from future development in the City. The sewer connection fees (PMC Section 6-

11.102 and 6-11.103) are designed to offset future costs for the replacement and expansion of the Wastewater Treatment Plant and related sewage collection facilities. The inflow and infiltration charges (PMC Section 6-11.104) reflect the contribution necessary to maintain the existing capacity of the collection system to serve new development by providing facilities to eliminate an equivalent volume of inflow and infiltration as the new flows contribute to the sewage system. The sewer tap fee (PMC Section 6-11.301) applies only if the City performs the tap and it reflects the actual cost of the service.

5.a
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 5
4880-6649-6405 v1
The fee amount collected is based on the required sanitary sewer improvements which are based on the proposed new projects generated by the respective uses and the estimated cost to construct the required improvements. The fee is imposed on new residential, commercial and retail development.

8. Street Improvement Fee. The City of Pacifica is responsible for maintaining over 90 centerline miles of street pavement. The City’s Street maintenance program has been chronically underfunded and as a result the City currently has one of the lowest pavement condition index (PCI) score in the bay area cities and faces a growing deficit in needed pavement maintenance and rehabilitation funding.

Utility Pavement Cut Recovery Fee (PMC Section 7-2.214). The Utility Pavement Cut Recovery Fee is imposed on private development projects pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code (Utility Pavement Cut Recovery Fee, Section 214, Article 2, Chapter 2, Title 7). Excavations in paved streets owned and maintained by the City degrade and shorten the life of the surface of the streets, and this degradation increases the frequency and cost to the public of necessary resurfacing, maintenance and repair. These excavations cause degradation of the streets even where the excavations are refilled and repaired in conformity with applicable standards and requirements. It is appropriate that entities responsible for excavating into the City right-of-way bear the burden of the resulting cost of this degradation and shortened life of the surface rather than the taxpayers of the City. In addition, establishment of a Utility Pavement Cut Recovery Fee will create an incentive for utilities to coordinate excavations in the streets.

The purpose of this Utility Pavement Cut Recovery impact fee is to defray the actual or estimated cost of restoration and maintenance of City pavement related to the increased use and degradation of paved streets owned by the City resulting from pavement excavations for new development in the City.

The fee amount collected is based on the "Council-Approved Rate" contained in the most recently adopted Impact Fee Schedule. The fee is imposed on residential/commercial/retail development.

Construction Vehicle Impact Fee (PMC Title 8, Chapter 21). The Construction Vehicle Impact Fee is imposed on private development projects pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code (Construction Vehicle Impact Fee, Chapter 21, Title 8). The purpose of the Construction Vehicle Impact fee is to defray the actual or estimated cost of restoring City streets to accommodate the increased use and deterioration resulting from heavy construction vehicles associated with future development in the City.

The fee amount collected is based on the deterioration of City streets caused by new development’s construction vehicles, measured by the square footage added by the new development, and the new development’s proportionate cost to restore the damaged City streets. The fee is imposed on all developments in the City that require a building permit and add new residential or nonresidential building square footage.

9. Housing In-Lieu Fee. For any residential development that is not located within the redevelopment project area, the developer may propose to pay the City an amount of money in lieu of providing a Below Market Rate (BMR) unit. The purpose of the Housing In-Lieu fee is to provide funding assistance for the provision of affordable housing in-lieu of the BMR unit required for new development in the City.

The in-lieu fee amount collected shall be based on the estimated cost to provide the BMR unit and shall be set forth in a resolution adopted by the City Council. In-lieu payments shall be paid prior to occupancy of the first market rate unit to be developed within the residential development.

5.a
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 6
4880-6649-6405 v1

10. Tree In-Lieu Fee. The City established the Tree Fund for the preservation of protected trees on public and private property and to promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City, while recognizing individual rights to develop, maintain, and enjoy private property. (Establishment of Tree Fund, Section 4-12-23, Chapter 12, Title 4). The Tree In-Lieu fee is an agreed upon restoration payment. The purpose of the Tree In-lieu fee is for payment of the full replacement value of a mature tree or trees in lieu thereof if on-site replacement is not feasible.

The City shall administer and use the Tree Fund for the following purposes: (1) Purchasing, planting, and maintaining trees within the City; (2) Acquiring, maintaining, and preserving trees within the City to remain in a naturalistic state in perpetuity; (3) Performing and maintaining a City-wide tree inventory; (4) Educating residents and developers on the preservation, care, maintenance, benefits and value of trees within the City of Pacifica; and (5) Supporting programs for the purpose of increasing the tree canopy within the City of Pacifica as approved by the Council.

To mitigate the adverse effects of tree removal, a tree removal permit shall include conditions that require relocation of tree(s) on-site as recommended by a certified arborist, and/or replacement planting of a minimum of two (2) replacement trees for every otherwise healthy tree removed and may be required to pay the replacement value of the mature protected tree minus the cost of the two (2) replacement trees or payment of the full replacement value of a mature tree or trees in lieu thereof if on-site replacement is not feasible. No applicant shall be required to expend more on the replacement trees than the appraised value of the trees for which a permit is required. The Director shall determine the replacement value of the trees utilizing the most recent edition of the Guide for Plant Appraisal by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers.

5.a
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 7
4880-6649-6405 v1

CURRENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULES
66006(b)(1)(B)
Highway 1 Improvement Impact Fee
Table 1 Current Highway 1 Improvement Impact Fee
(a) Primary Impacting Area (as defined in Municipal Code Section 8-15.03) Fee
(1) Per new residential unit $6,434
(2) Per new second residential unit $3,173
(3) Per new commercial unit (per square foot of gross floor area) $2.60 (b) Secondary Impacting Area (as defined in Municipal Code Section 8-15.03) Fee
(1) Per new residential unit $2,149
(2) Per new second residential unit $1,095
(3) Per new commercial unit (per square foot of gross floor area) $0.82 Manor Drive Improvement Impact Fee
Table 2 Current Manor Drive Improvement Impact Fee
(a) Primary Impacting Area (as defined in Municipal Code Chapter 18, Title 8) Fee
(1) Per daily trip generated. $469
Planned Local Drainage Impact Fee
Table 3 Current Planned Local Drainage Impact Fee
(a) Area Number (as defined in Municipal Code Section 7-4.101):

Area Number Watershed Title Fee per acre
1 Globe $0
2 Edgemar $5,946
3 Pacific Manor $5,196
4 Salada Beach $5,196
5 Brighton $6,202
6 Fairway Park $11,592
7 Vallemar $8,213

5.a
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 8
4880-6649-6405 v1
8 Rockaway Beach $15,298
9 Lower Linda Mar $0
10 Linda Mar $5,484
General Capital Improvement Impact Fee
Table 4 Current General Capital Improvement Impact Fee
(a) Primary Impacting Area (as defined in Municipal Code Article 2, Chapter 4, Title 7) Fee
(1) Per bedroom in a dwelling unit $329
(2) Per hotel or motel unit $164
(3) each other new structure (except accessory buildings and buildings or structures primarily used for Boys' or Girls' Clubs, Boy or Girl Scouts, or other nonprofit activities for which the Council may waive the fee).

2.0079% of
the
valuation
In-Lieu Parking Facilities Fee
Table 5 Current In-Lieu Parking Facilities Fee
On April 27, 2020 City Council approved the increase of the In-Lieu Parking Facilities Fee for the Rockaway Beach Specific Plan Area (a) Primary Impacting Area (as defined in Resolution No. 23-2020) Fee
(1) Fee per in-lieu parking space. $43,497
On May 11, 2020 City Council approved Resolution No. 25-2020 to establish the In-Lieu Parking Facilities Fee for the Sharp Park Specific Plan Area (a) Primary Impacting Area (as defined in Resolution No. 25-2020) Fee
(1) Fee per in-lieu parking space. $43,497
Parks Facilities Impact Fee
Table 6 Current Parks Facilities Impact Fee
(a) Primary Impacting Area (as defined in Municipal Code Chapter 19, Title 8) Park Facilities Impact Fee (Mitigation Fee Act)
Bedrooms Fee
Zero $9,614.00

5.a
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 9
4880-6649-6405 v1
One $11,274.00
Two $17,222.00
Three $20,888.00
Four $23,862.00
Five $27,597.00
Each after Five $3,735.00
Sewer Facility Construction Impact Fee
Table 7 Current Sewer Facility Construction Impact Fee
(a) Primary Impacting Area (as defined in Municipal Code Chapter 19, Title 8) CONNECTION FEES (SEC. 6-11.102)
Fee
a) Residential Units: Single, Townhouse, or Condominium dwelling unit $1,455 b) Second Unit Unit $728
c) Multi-Family Dwellings $1,104
d) Commercial Units (= # fixture units/12) $1,455
TRUNK LINE FEES (SEC. 6-11.103)
Fee
a) Residential
1) Per unit: Single, Townhouse, Condominium, or multi-family $1,094 2) Per acre $2,184
b) Second Unit Unit
1) Per unit $1,094
2) Per acre $2,184
c) Commercial Units (= # fixture units/12)
1) Per commercial unit (= # fixture units/12) $1,094
2) Per acre $2,184
INFLOW/INFILTRATION FEES (SEC. 6-11.104)
Fee
a) Residential
1) Per unit: Single, Townhouse, Condominium, or multi-family $798 2) Per acre $1,699
b) Second Unit Unit
1) Per unit $399
2) Per acre $850
c) Commercial Units (= # fixture units/12)
1) Per commercial unit (= # fixture units/12) $798

5.a
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 10
4880-6649-6405 v1
2) Per acre $1,699
SEWER TAP FEES (SEC. 6-11.301)
Fee
Number of Taps $472

INSPECTION AND REVIEW CHARGES
Fee
Number of Hours $250
Street Improvement Fee
Table 8 Current Street Improvement Fee
Utility Pavement Cut Fee
Functional Class Age Group
Cut Area (Percent Section Area)
<10% of Section Area ≥10% of Section Area
Arterials/Collector
s
<10 years $2.50 $4.00
≥10 years $1.50 $2.50
Residential
<10 years $1.50 $3.00
≥10 years $1.00 $2.50
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU): Utility Pavement Cut Fee shall not be charged for any ADU that is under 750 square feet or an ADU of any size when the ADU is being constructed at the same time, under the same permit, as a new main residential unit or an expansion of the main unit that make payment of the fees as required.

Partial or Full Credit Utility Cut Fees for Developments with Pavement Improvements: A credit my be applied against the Utility Cut Fees for completing frontage roadway paving.

Reduced Utility Cut Fees Related to Sewer Lateral Repairs Not Requiring a Lateral Compliance Certificate: A minimal fee of $500 will be charged for pavement cuts fees related to fixing a sewer lateral not requiring a Sewer Lateral Compliance Certificate.

Construction Vehicle Impact Fee
Residential Unit /
Multi-Family Fee
Non-Residential
Unit Fee
Per Square Foot $1.19 / sq. ft. $1.19 / sq. ft.

5.a
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 11
4880-6649-6405 v1
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU): Construction Vehicle Impact Fees shall not be charged for any ADU that is under 750 square feet or an ADU of any size when the ADU is being constructed at the same time, under the same permit, as a new main residential unit or an expansion of the main unit that make payment of the fees as required.

Housing In-Lieu Fee
Table 9 Current Housing In-Lieu Fee
(a) For a BMR Unit affordable to a Lower Income Household (Resolution No. 24-2007) Fee
Rental Unit: $205,416
For Sale Unit:

Detached Single Family: $561,910
Condominium/Townhouse: $356,910
(b) For a BMR Unit affordable to a Moderate Income Household (Resolution No. 24-2007) Fee
Rental Unit: $26,732
For Sale Unit:

Detached Single Family: $465,023
Condominium/Townhouse: $260,023
Tree In-Lieu Fee
Table 10 Current Tree In-Lieu Fee
IN-LIEU TREE FEES (SEC. 4-12.04 (e))
Fee
Per Tree The appraised value of the tree(s) for which a tree removal permit is required.

The Director of the Department of Public Works shall determine the replacement value of the trees utilizing the most recent edition of the Guide for Plant Appraisal by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers.

5.a
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 12
4880-6649-6405 v1

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE

5.a
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 13
4880-6649-6405 v1
HIGHWAY 1 IMPROVEMENTS
Table 11 Highway 1 Improvements - Fund 12
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Ending June 30, 2023
Description FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

REVENUES
Fees $39,296 $21,566
Interest $0 $4,191
Total Revenues $39,296 $25,757
EXPENDITURES [1] % From Fees % From Fees
Capital Improvements $0 0% $0 0%
Fee Administration [2] $21,145 73% $20,889 100%
Total Expenditures $21,145 $20,889

REVENUES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES $18,151 $4,868
Fund Balance, Beginning of the Year $130,114 $148,265
Fund Balance, End of Year $148,265 $153,133
[1] For the 2022-2023 fiscal year the City did not provide any interfund transfers, loans or refunds from funds that utilize development fees. [2] Include staff time to manage Highway 1 projects, collection of fees, participating in the San Mateo County Congestion Management. [3] City is seeking grant funds to complete the project.

Proposed Future Projects Total Cost Impact Fees Grant Funds [3] % From Fees Commencement
Year
Pacifica State Beach Trail Rehabilitation Project $400,000 $200,000 $200,000 50% 2025

5.a
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 14
4880-6649-6405 v1

MANOR DRIVE/PALMETTO AVENUE/OCEANA BOULEVARD INTERSECTIONS Table 12 Manor Drive/Palmetto Avenue/Oceana Boulevard - Fund 14 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Ending June 30, 2023
Description FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

REVENUES
Fees $4,670 $21,566
Interest $0 $0
Total Revenues $4,670 $21,566
EXPENDITURES [1] % From Fees % From Fees
Manor Drive Over-Crossing Improvement Project [2] $81,145 100% $635,822 0% Total Expenditures $81,145 $635,822

REVENUES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES ($76,475) ($614,256)
Fund Balance, Beginning of the Year $6,930 ($69,545)
Fund Balance, End of Year ($69,545) ($683,801)
[1] For the 2022-2023 fiscal year the City did not provide any interfund transfers, loans or refunds from funds that utilize development fees. [2] City Council adopted Resolution 82-2021 on 12/13/21 identifying the Manor Drive Over-Crossing Improvement Project to be funded by this fee. City will receive $3,000,000 in grant funds from San Mateo County Transportation Authority Measure W funds. [3] City is seeking grant funds to complete the project.

Proposed Future Projects Total Cost [3] Impact Fees Grant Funds % From Fees Commencement Year
Manor Drive Over-Crossing Improvement
Project $17,000,000 $900,000 $16,100,000 5% On-going

5.a
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 15
4880-6649-6405 v1

PLANNED DRAINAGE FACILITIES FEES AND RESERVE FOR DRAINAGE FACILITY CONSTRUCTION FUNDS Table 13 Planned Drainage Facilities Fees/Reserve For Drainage Facility - Fund 19 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Ending June 30, 2023
Description FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

REVENUES
Fees $0 $2,217
Interest $0 $2,456
Total Revenues $0 $4,673
EXPENDITURES [1] % From Fees % From Fees
Storm Drainage Master Plan $86,265 100% $0 0%
Total Expenditures $86,265 $0

REVENUES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES ($86,265) $4,673
Fund Balance, Beginning of the Year $171,335 $85,070
Fund Balance, End of Year $85,070 $89,743
[1] For the 2022-2023 fiscal year the City did not provide any interfund transfers, loans or refunds from funds that utilize development fees. [2] City is seeking grant funds to complete the project.

Proposed Future Projects Total Cost [2] Impact Fees Grant Funds % From Fees Commencement Year
Clarendon Road Drainage Improvements $1,240,000 $140,000 $1,100,000 11% 2025

5.a
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 16
4880-6649-6405 v1

CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Table 14 Capital Projects Fund - Fund 22
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Ending June 30, 2023
Description FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

REVENUES
Fees $52,992 $16,701
Interest $0 $0
Total Revenues $52,992 $16,701
EXPENDITURES [1] % From Fees % From Fees
Engineering Services $51 10% $0 0%
Work Order System $4,375 10% $0 0%
Various Bldg Repairs $9,440 20% $0 0%
PD Parking Light and Pathway $2,200 10% $0 0%
PW Office and Facility Assessment $4,768 10% $0 0%
Cubicles Community Center $188,977 100% $0 0%
Civic Center Conceptual Design $105 10% $0 0%
Total Expenditures $209,915 $0

REVENUES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES ($156,922) $16,701 [2]
Fund Balance, Beginning of the Year ($13,557) ($170,479) Fund Balance, End of Year ($170,479) ($153,779)
[1] For the 2022-2023 fiscal year the City did not provide any interfund transfers or refunds from funds that utilize development fees. [2] The $16,701 balance was used to repay the loan to complete the Cubicles Community Center project. Of all loan payments this FY, 100% was from this impact fee. The loan will be repaid by 2024 and with 0% interest rate on the loan.

Proposed Future Projects Total Cost Impact Fees Grant Funds % From Fees Commencement Year
None

5.a
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 17
4880-6649-6405 v1

IN-LIEU PARKING FACILITIES FEE
Table 15 In-Lieu Parking Facilities Fee - Fund 25
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Ending June 30, 2023
Description FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

REVENUES
Fees $0 $0
Interest $0 $3,268
Total Revenues $0 $3,268
EXPENDITURES [1] % From Fees % From Fees
Capital Improvements $0 100% $0 0%
Total Expenditures $0 $0

REVENUES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES $0 $3,268
Fund Balance, Beginning of the Year $171,335 $171,335
Fund Balance, End of Year $171,335 $174,603
[1] For the 2022-2023 fiscal year the City did not provide any interfund transfers, loans or refunds from funds that utilize development fees.

Proposed Future Projects Total Cost Impact Fees Grant Funds % From Fees Commencement Year
Rockaway Beach Parking Structure $10,155,000 $10,155,000 $0 100% 2030

5.a
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 18
4880-6649-6405 v1

PARK FACILITIES IMPACT FEE
Table 16 Park Facilities Impact Fee - Fund 26
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Ending June 30, 2023
Description FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

REVENUES
Fees $147,617 $92,237
Interest $0
Total Revenues $147,617 $92,237
EXPENDITURES [1] % From Fees % From Fees
Playground Equipment Improvement Project
(transfer to Roy Davies Trust) [2] $0 0% $300,000 100%
Park Project FY21-22 $15,899 100% $0 0%
Total Expenditures $15,899 $300,000

REVENUES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES $131,718 ($207,763)
Fund Balance, Beginning of the Year $65,925 $197,643
Fund Balance, End of Year $197,643 ($10,120)
[1] For the 2022-2023 fiscal year the City did not provide any loans or refunds from funds that utilize development fees. [2] City Council adopted a Resolution on 12/9/19 identifying the Playground Equipment Improvement Project for the unexpended fees.

Transfer to Roy Davies Trust fund to fund the Playground Equipment Improvement Project.

Proposed Future Projects Total Cost Impact Fees Roy Davies Funds % From Fees Commencement
Year
Playground Equipment Improvement
(formerly Parks & Recreation Projects) [2] $2,430,000 $300,000 $2,130,000 12% On-going

5.a
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 19
4880-6649-6405 v1

SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES
Table 17 Sewer Connection Charges - Fund 34
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Ending June 30, 2023
Description FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

REVENUES
Fees $36,246 $63,282
Interest $0 $0
Total Revenues $36,246 $63,282
EXPENDITURES [1] [3] % From Fees % From Fees
Pump Replacements $1,966 5% $0 0%
Scada & PLC System $293 5% $0 0%
Ultraviolet Disinfection $2,339 5% $0 0%
WWTP Rate Study $2,139 5% $0 0%
Linda Mar Pump Station $43,406 10% $0 0%
Collection System $52,638 10% $0 0%
Rockaway Pump Station $8,965 10% $0 0%
Sewer System Master Plan $1,593 5% $0 0%
Sharp Park Pump Station $11,181 10% $0 0%
Equalization Basin Project $947 10% $0 0%
Repair and Rehabilitation $19,277 10% $0 0%
CCWRP Storage & Office $68 5% $0 0%
CCWRP Projects $1,286 5% $0 0%
CCWRP Photovoltaics Improvement $11,682 5% $0 0%
CCWRP Repair & Replace $3,580 5% $0 0%
Anza Pump Station Repair $83,961 10% $0 0%
Total Expenditures $245,321 $0

REVENUES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES ($209,075) $63,282 [2]
Fund Balance, Beginning of the Year ($360,244) ($569,319) Fund Balance, End of Year ($569,319) ($506,037)
[1] For the 2022-2023 fiscal year the City did not provide any interfund transfers or refunds from funds that utilize development fees. [2] The $63,282 balance was used to repay the loan to complete the Collection System project. Of all loan payments this FY, 100% was from this impact fee. The loan will be repaid by 2024 and with 0% interest rate on the loan. [3] Sewer Connection Fees did not fund wholly or in part any completed projects this past FY.

Proposed Future Projects Total Cost Impact Fees Grant Funds % From Fees Commencement Year
None

5.a
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 20
4880-6649-6405 v1

STREET IMPROVEMENT FEE
Table 18 Street Improvement Fund - Utility Pavement Cut Fee Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Ending June 30, 2023
Description FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

REVENUES
Fees $0 $155,470
Interest $0 $4,375
Total Revenues $0 $159,845
EXPENDITURES [1] % From Fees % From Fees
Capital Improvements $0 0% $0 0%
Total Expenditures $0 $0

REVENUES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES $0 $159,845
Fund Balance, Beginning of the Year $0 $0
Fund Balance, End of Year $0 $159,845
[1] For the 2022-2023 fiscal year the City did not provide any interfund transfers, loans or refunds from funds that utilize development fees.

Proposed Future Projects Total Cost Impact Fees Gas Tax & Measure W % From Fees Commencement
Year
FY 2024-25 Pavement Resurfacing Project $2,200,000 $200,000 $2,000,000 9% 2024

5.a
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 21
4880-6649-6405 v1

STREET IMPROVEMENT FEE
Table 19 Street Improvement Fund - Construction Vehicle Impact Fee Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Ending June 30, 2023
Description FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

REVENUES
Fees $0 $20,449
Interest $0 $575
Total Revenues $0 $21,024
EXPENDITURES [1] % From Fees % From Fees
Capital Improvements $0 0% $0 0%
Total Expenditures $0 $0

REVENUES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES $0 $21,024
Fund Balance, Beginning of the Year $0 $0
Fund Balance, End of Year $0 $21,024
[1] For the 2022-2023 fiscal year the City did not provide any interfund transfers, loans or refunds from funds that utilize development fees.

Proposed Future Projects Total Cost Impact Fees Gas Tax & Measure W % From Fees Commencement
Year
FY 2025-26 Pavement Resurfacing Project $2,000,000 $100,000 $1,900,000 5% 2025

5.a
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 22
4880-6649-6405 v1

HOUSING IN-LIEU FEE
Table 20 Housing In-Lieu Fee
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Ending June 30, 2023
Description FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

REVENUES
Fees $0 $0
Interest $0 $0
Total Revenues $0 $0
EXPENDITURES [1] % From Fees % From Fees
Capital Improvements $0 0% $0 0%
Total Expenditures $0 $0

REVENUES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES $0 $0
Fund Balance, Beginning of the Year $0 $0
Fund Balance, End of Year $0 $0
[1] For the 2022-2023 fiscal year the City did not provide any interfund transfers, loans or refunds from funds that utilize development fees.

Proposed Future Projects Total Cost Impact Fees Gas Tax & Measure W % From Fees Commencement
Year
None

5.a
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act 2022/2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report 23
4880-6649-6405 v1

TREE IN-LIEU FEE
Table 21 Tree In-Lieu Fee
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Ending June 30, 2023
Description FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

REVENUES
Fees $0 $0
Interest $0 $0
Total Revenues $0 $0
EXPENDITURES [1] % From Fees % From Fees
Capital Improvements $0 0% $0 0%
Total Expenditures $0 $0

Proposed Future Projects Total Cost Impact Fees Gas Tax & Measure W % From Fees Commencement
Year
None

5.a
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: 2022-2023 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (5547 : 2022-2023 Mitigation Fee Act

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/8/2024
1 SUBJECT:

Annual Part-Time Salary Schedule Update
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Move to adopt the resolution approving the annual part-time salary schedule update that went into effect January 1, 2024.

STAFF CONTACT:

Yulia Carter, Assistant City Manager
650-738-7440
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Irene Camarena, Human Resources Manager
650-738-7303
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The City’s Part-Time Salary Schedule includes approximately 31 part-time position classifications used for various City functions.

The City’s current part-time salary schedule became effective January 1, 2023, with a recommendation of a $15.50 minimum wage effective January 1, 2023.

The proposed part-time Salary Schedule 2024 (Attachment A) will ensure that the City complies with the State’s minimum wage requirements.

In 2023, the minimum wage is $15.50 for all employees regardless of employer size. One of the protections of the minimum wage law is an annual review of the wage rate using the U.S.

Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical workers. This law increased the minimum wage over time, consistent with economic expansion while providing safety valves if adverse economic conditions emerged. On July 31, 2023, Governor Newsom certified the minimum wage increase for all employers for 2024 regardless of the number of employees, shall pay to each employee wages not less than $16.00 per hour effective January 1, 2024.

For the City, this increase will continue to help address additional concerns, such as difficulty attracting and retaining qualified part-time staff. To help our employees achieve economic security and acknowledge the higher relative cost of living on the Peninsula, the City Manager recommends approval for a minimum wage that reaches $16.00 per hour, effective January 1, 2024, which will address compaction and retention concerns.

The revised salary schedule includes adjusting salary ranges for eight part-time positions to 6 Packet Pg. 82
Pacifica City Council 2
January 08, 2024
comply with the minimum wage increase and four have been adjusted to address compaction as follows:

Staff estimates that the proposed changes to the part-time salary schedule will have minimal impact on the City’s operating budget. Budget trends show that departments typically are under budget or absorb additional costs within their operating budget for part-time, hourly positions.

Part-time hourly positions are budgeted based on business needs and are allocated accordingly while minimum wage and hourly wages have continued to increase every year.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

Minimum wage salary adjustment is consistent with State requirements; therefore, there is no alternative action provided.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN:

The recommended action is consistent with the following Council goal:

Enhance Organizational and Fiscal Stability.

FISCAL IMPACT:
6 Packet Pg. 83
Pacifica City Council 3
January 08, 2024
The budget impact of the proposed part-time salary schedule is anticipated to have a minimal impact on the City’s operating budget. The 2022-23 Adopted Budget provides adequate budget authority to allow each department to absorb this annual CPI increase.

ORIGINATED BY:

Human Resources
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment A: Part Time Salary Schedule 2024 (PDF)
6 Packet Pg. 84
Pacifica City Council 4
January 08, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. __-2024

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA REVISING THE

PART-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, the City of Pacifica annually reviews the salary ranges of its part-time employees for compliance with the State of California Minimum Wage regulations; and WHEREAS, the California Minimum Wage will increase to $16.00 per hour effective January 1, 2024; and
WHEREAS, it is the City’s intent to continue to provide its residents with quality service and programs; and
WHEREAS, it is the City’s desire to attract and retain qualified part-time employees to staff these qualitative programs; and
WHEREAS, it is the City’s desire to improve efficiency by appropriately staffing Departments.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pacifica that the revised part-time salary schedule listed and included in Attachment A are hereby revised and authorized, as of January 8, 2024.
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 8th day of January, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:

Sue Vaterlaus, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ______________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 6 Packet Pg. 85
Position Title Base Hourly Rate Max Hourly
Rate
Unit
Aquatics Specialist $17.00 $22.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Assistant Swim Coach $16.00 $22.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Building Attendant $16.00 $23.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Child Care Aide $16.00 $19.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Child Care Associate Teacher $19.50 $25.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Code Enforcement Specialist $16.00 $24.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Driver (Bus/Van) $16.00 $25.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Fire Prevention Specialist $22.00 $37.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Food Services Coordinator (Relief Cook) $29.10 $37.10 Unrepresented Employee Group Head Swim Coach $22.50 $25.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Information & Referral Coordinator $16.00 $25.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Information Technology Support Assistant $25.00 $30.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Instructional Teacher $16.00 $35.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Intern (Various Departments) $16.00 $27.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Kitchen Assistant $16.00 $19.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Laboratory Assistant $18.00 $22.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Lifeguard I $16.00 $18.00 Unrepresented Employee Group
Lifeguard II $18.00 $20.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Maintenance Assistant $19.00 $23.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Office Assistant $16.00 $21.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Pool Cashier $16.00 $17.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Pool Manager $19.50 $23.50 Unrepresented Employee Group Program Manager $40.00 $50.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Public Meeting Stenographer $20.00 $25.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Recreation Leader I/II $16.00 $18.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Recreation Leader III/IV $18.00 $21.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Recreation Leader V $21.00 $23.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Senior Life Guard $20.00 $22.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Senior Water Safety Instructor $18.00 $20.50 Unrepresented Employee Group Wastewater Operator-in-Training $18.00 $20.00 Unrepresented Employee Group Water Safety Instructor $16.50 $18.00 Unrepresented Employee Group *The City has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information provided in this document.

However, the information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. The City does not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this document. Questions or concerns regarding this document should be directed to [email protected].

CITY OF PACIFICA

PART TIME MASTER SALARY SCHEDULE
LAST REVISED 1/1/2024
ATTACHMENT A 6.a
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Attachment A: Part Time Salary Schedule 2024 [Revision 1] (5554 : Annual Part-Time Salary Schedule Update)

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/8/2024
1 SUBJECT:

Amendment No. 1 to Agreement between the City of Pacifica and Serra Cab for Senior Transportation Services
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Move to adopt a Resolution approving Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement between the City of Pacifica and Serra Yellow Cab to increase rates for the periods January 1, 2024 to June 30, 2024 and July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 for the Senior Transportation Services CaR Program such that the total fees for services under the Agreement shall remain unchanged at $85,0000.

STAFF CONTACT:

Bob Palacio, Director, Parks, Beaches and Recreation
(650) 738-7381
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The City of Pacifica Senior Transportation Program, “Connect A Ride” (CaR), was approved unanimously by City Council on September 23rd, 2019. The purpose of the program is to reduce senior isolation and address transportation gaps for seniors in Pacifica. Seniors have an opportunity to receive aid in transportation for social or daily tasks. The program is for Pacifica residents 65+ years old. The Parks Beaches and Recreation Senior Services Division manages the program. Funding for the CaR program was made possible from the generous gift of Sirkka Niukkanen. Participants have 8 one-way rides loaded onto their rider card automatically each month (no-carryovers from month to month). Defined boundaries for rides can be anywhere in Pacifica City limits, Colma Bart Station, hospitals, medical offices and dialysis centers between Daly City and Burlingame. All rides must begin or end in Pacifica City limits.

The cost for rides within the boundaries is $5 per ride for the CaR participant, and the remainder of the fare within the set boundaries subsidized by the Sirkka Niukkanen Trust. CaR riders may bring guests as long as they have the same pickup and drop off point. The number of guests is based on the licensed passengers posted in each cab (usually 4).

The City of Pacifica's Parks Beaches, and Recreation Department and Serra Yellow Cab have a City Council approved agreement through June 30, 2025 to provide transportation services for the seniors “Connect A Ride” program. In September of 2023, Serra Cab informed the PB&R Department that they intended to increase their current rates by $7 per ride for all cities participating in a senior transportation program effective immediately. Staff successfully negotiated with Serra Cab to agree to a lower stepped increase (see below), effectively paying less than other cities for the same service.

It is important to note that cab drivers have the discretion to choose which rides they pick up, and if the city of Pacifica were to pay substantially less than other cities there would be a 7 Packet Pg. 87
Pacifica City Council 2
January 08, 2024
likelihood that Pacifica seniors would receive a decrease in service. Staff believes that the agreed upon amount will allow the City to continue with a high level of service yet pay less than neighboring cities.
• Effective January 9, 2024, Increasing the price on the minimum under 5 miles ride will go from $18.10 plus 15% service fee to $21.10 plus 15% service fee. • Effective January 2024, wheelchair ride under 5 miles will be $40.00 dollars plus 15% service fee. Wheelchair Rides over 5 miles will be $40.00 plus $3.00 a mile plus 15% service fee.
• Effective July 1, 2024, rides under 5 miles will be $23.10 plus 15% service fee. Rides over 5 miles will be $23.10 plus $3.00 a mile plus 15% service fee. • Traffic delays, stays, and waiting time remains the same 50 cent per minutes.

Trips
Information

REQUESTING
all Cities to
Pay
Pervious Fee Pacifica
Jan 2024
Pacifica July
2024-June
2025
Increase $7 increase $3 increase $2 increase
Rides
under 5
miles
$25.10 plus
15%
$18.10 plus
15%
$21.10 plus
15%
$23.10 plus
15%
Rides over
5 miles
$25.10 plus
$3.00 a mile
plus 15%
$18.10 plus
$3.00 a mile
plus 15%
$21.10 plus
$3.00 a mile
plus 15%
$23.10 plus
$3.00 a mile
plus 15%
Wheelchair
under 5
miles
$40.00 plus
15%
NA $40.00 plus
15%
$40.00 plus
15%
Rides over
5 miles
$40.00 plus
$3.00 a mile
plus 15%
NA $40.00 plus
$3.00 a mile
plus 15%
$40.00 plus
$3.00 a mile
plus 15%
Waiting
time and
stops in
traffic
.50 cents per
minute
.50 cents per
minute
.50 cents per
minute
.50 cents per
minute
Invoices
projections
$2400-$3000 $2800-$3400 $3100-$3800
Increase
Rates
projections
$450-$550
per month
$350-$500
per month
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

Council can reject the Addendum and give staff alternative direction.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

Aligns with Pacifica’s Vision and Values: Heartfelt Service and Socially Inclusive 7 Packet Pg. 88
Pacifica City Council 3
January 08, 2024
FISCAL IMPACT:

This program is funded by the Sirkka Niukkanen Trust which currently has a balance of $2.1M.

Senior Transportation monthly costs will rise between $450-$550 per month from Jan 1, 2024 - June 30, 2024, and monthly costs will rise an additional $350 - $500 per month from July 1, 2024 - June 30, 2025. The cost to the individual senior will remain at $5 per trip.

ORIGINATED BY:

Parks, Beaches & Recreation Department
ATTACHMENT LIST:
20200701_Agreement_PBR_Serra Cab Contract_Senior Transportation (PDF) Pacifica Serra Cab Car Program Amendment to Agreement New Rate Schedule 2024-2025 (CAO Edits) (DOCX)
7 Packet Pg. 89
Pacifica City Council 4
January 08, 2024
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PACIFICA AND SERRA YELLOW CAB TO INCREASE RATES FOR THE PERIODS JANUARY 1, 2024 TO JUNE 30, 2024 AND JULY 1, 2024 TO JUNE 30, 2025
WHEREAS, the City of Pacifica and Serra Yellow Cab entered into a 5 year agreement on July 1, 2020 for Serra Yellow Cab to provide senior transportation for the Pacifica Connect-A-Ride (CAR) program; and
WHEREAS, due to the rising cost of gasoline, insurance, and general transportation services, Serra Cab has requested an increase in baseline prices charged to the City of Pacifica; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pacifica CAR senior transportation is a valued and useful program which allows seniors to become more independent and less isolated; and WHEREAS, in order for Serra Yellow Cab to continue to provide services to the City of Pacifica, the increases are deemed necessary.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pacifica that it hereby approves Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement between the City of Pacifica and Serra Yellow Cab to increase rates under the Agreement to cover the periods from January 12, 2024 until June 30, 2024 and from July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 per the amended rate schedule included as Exhibit B to Amendment No. 1, and authorizes the City Manager to execute the necessary amendments such that the total fees for services under the Agreement shall remain unchanged at $85,0000.
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 8th day of January, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:

Sue Vaterlaus, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ______________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 7 Packet Pg. 90

7.a
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: 20200701_Agreement_PBR_Serra Cab Contract_Senior Transportation (5553 : Addendum to Agreement PBR and Serra Cab)

7.a
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: 20200701_Agreement_PBR_Serra Cab Contract_Senior Transportation (5553 : Addendum to Agreement PBR and Serra Cab)

7.a
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: 20200701_Agreement_PBR_Serra Cab Contract_Senior Transportation (5553 : Addendum to Agreement PBR and Serra Cab)

7.a
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: 20200701_Agreement_PBR_Serra Cab Contract_Senior Transportation (5553 : Addendum to Agreement PBR and Serra Cab)

7.a
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: 20200701_Agreement_PBR_Serra Cab Contract_Senior Transportation (5553 : Addendum to Agreement PBR and Serra Cab)

7.a
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: 20200701_Agreement_PBR_Serra Cab Contract_Senior Transportation (5553 : Addendum to Agreement PBR and Serra Cab)

7.a
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: 20200701_Agreement_PBR_Serra Cab Contract_Senior Transportation (5553 : Addendum to Agreement PBR and Serra Cab)

7.a
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: 20200701_Agreement_PBR_Serra Cab Contract_Senior Transportation (5553 : Addendum to Agreement PBR and Serra Cab)

7.a
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: 20200701_Agreement_PBR_Serra Cab Contract_Senior Transportation (5553 : Addendum to Agreement PBR and Serra Cab) AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT with Serra Yellow Cab for
Transportation Services for City of Pacifica Senior Transportation Program (CaR)
This AMENDMENT No. 1 (“Amendment”) is entered into as of the ____ day of _________, 2024, by and between the CITY OF PACIFICA (“CITY”) and Serra Yellow Cab, a California Corporation (“CONTRACTOR”), whose address is 195 87th Street #D, Daly City, CA 94015.

RECITALS
A. On July 1, 2020, CITY and CONSULTANT entered into an Agreement for Transportation Services for CITY’s Senior Transportation Program. (“Agreement”).

B. CITY and CONSULTANT now mutually desire to increase rates under the Agreement to cover the periods from January 1, 2024 until June 30, 2024 and from July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025.

C. CITY and CONSULTANT mutually agree that the total fees for services under the Agreement shall remain unchanged at $85,0000.

D. CITY and CONSULTANT therefore desire to amend EXHIBIT B of the Agreement to reflect the increased rate schedule.

AGREEMENT

1. Recitals. The foregoing Recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein as terms of this Agreement.

2. Amendment. City and CONSULTANT agree to amend the Agreement as set forth as follows:

EXHIBIT B – PAYMENT RATES is hereby replaced in its entirety by the amended EXHIBIT B attached to this Amendment No. 1.

3. Agreement in Effect. All other provisions of the Agreement not specifically amended herein shall remain in full force and effect.
[Signature on Next Page]

7.b
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Pacifica Serra Cab Car Program Amendment to Agreement New Rate Schedule 2024-2025 (CAO Edits) (5553 : Addendum to IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and CONSULTANT have executed this Amendment No.1 as of the date first written above.

CITY OF PACIFICA CONTRACTOR
Serra Yellow Cab
By: By:

Kevin Woodhouse Talib Salmin
City Manager General Manager and President
ATTEST:

By: __________________
Sarah Coffey
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Michelle M. Kenyon
City Attorney

7.b
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Pacifica Serra Cab Car Program Amendment to Agreement New Rate Schedule 2024-2025 (CAO Edits) (5553 : Addendum to

EXHIBIT B

PAYMENT RATES
CONTRACTOR will submit an itemized invoice to the CITY by the 20th of each month.

Invoices should be sent to:

Attn: Senior Transportation Program
(CaR)
540 Crespi Drive
Pacifica CA, 94044
The CITY will send invoiced payment within 30 days of receipt of the invoice. Payments should be sent to:

Serra Yellow Cab
Attn: Talib Salamin
195 87th Street 4D
Daly City, CA 94015
Transportation rates will be charged at the following rates: $3.10 starting fee (flag drop), plus $3 per mile, plus 15% service fee. Any rides that are less than five miles will be charged the five mile ($18.10) rate. An additional $0.30 click charge will be incurred for trips slowed by excessive traffic or other uncontrollable circumstances. The senior patrons will pay the first $5.00 and the remaining fee will be paid by the City.

Prices inclusive of assisted ride or ride requiring mobility equipped vehicle (able to accommodate wheel chairs and scooters).

Senior patrons shall pay the first $5.00 and the remaining fee will be paid by the City.

Prices inclusive of assisted ride or ride requiring mobility equipped vehicle (able to accommodate wheel chairs and scooters).

The above-described rates are amended as follows for the time period specified below:
• Effective January 9, 2024 and through June 30, 2024, the standard rate ($18.10 plus 15%) shall increase to $21.10 plus a 15% service fee • Effective July 1, 2024 and through June 30, 2025, the standard rate ($21.10 plus 15%) shall increase to $23.10 plus a 15% service fee.
• Effective January 9, 2024, the rate for under 5 mile rides shall increase from $18.10 plus 15% to $21.10 plus a 15% service fee.
• Effective January 9, 2024, and to June 30, 2025, the rate for wheelchair rides under 5 miles shall increase to $40.00 plus a 15% fee. Wheelchair rides over 5 miles shall increase to $40.00 plus $3.00 per mile plus a 15% service fee.

7.b
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Pacifica Serra Cab Car Program Amendment to Agreement New Rate Schedule 2024-2025 (CAO Edits) (5553 : Addendum to • Effective July 1, 2024 and through June 20, 2025, rides under 5 miles shall increase to $23.10 plus 15%. Rides over 5 miles shall increase to $23.10 plus $3.00 per mile and plus a 15% service fee.

Traffic delays, stays, and waiting time shall remain at the rate of $.50 per minute.

All fees, taxes and services under this Agreement shall not exceed $85,000.

7.b
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Pacifica Serra Cab Car Program Amendment to Agreement New Rate Schedule 2024-2025 (CAO Edits) (5553 : Addendum to

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/8/2024
1 SUBJECT:

Consultant Services Agreement for Housing Related Activities and Assignments Between the City of Pacifica and the Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) of San Mateo County.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Move to adopt a Resolution approving a Consultant Services Agreement with the Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (“HEART”) of San Mateo County for housing related activities assignments and related services with a fixed monthly rate of $3,166.64 until June 30, 2026, for a total of 358 hours of consultants services each year for approximately 30 months and to authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.

STAFF CONTACT:

Christian Murdock, AICP, Planning Director
(650) 738-7341
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The Planning Department is planning and implementing various programs outlined in the Draft Housing Element to be undertaken by the City during the 6th cycle planning period (2023-2031) in order to further the City’s Housing Element goals and policies and make measurable progress toward objectives, constraints, and fair housing issues, as well as compliance with state law.

However, due to limited staffing and the City’s budgetary constraints, the Planning Department does not have dedicated staff assigned to housing policy-related work. As a result, existing Planning Department staff cannot dedicate sufficient time to accomplish all anticipated housingrelated activities in upcoming years.

The City is a member of the Housing Endowment and Regional Trust of San Mateo County (hereinafter “HEART”)1, which is a Joint Powers Authority (“JPA”) established by the County of San Mateo and cities and towns within the County (“Member Agencies”) dated May 13, 2003.

The JPA was amended by the First Amended Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (“First Amended JPA Agreement”) on September 9, 2008.

The City and other Member Agencies are looking for ways to manage the workload relating to establishing and carrying out new housing programs identified in housing elements. The First Amended JPA Agreement authorizes HEART to facilitate and assist Member Agencies to operate, regulate, maintain, facilitate the planning and study of appropriate housing programs, projects and housing management practices.

The City, as a Member Agency of HEART, may utilize Heart’s services and staffing to obtain assistance in carrying out its housing programs. The Agreement for Consultant Services (“Agreement”) would provide expert housing staff services from the Housing Endowment and Regional Trust of San Mateo County (HEART of SMC) to augment Planning Department staff.

HEART of SMC partners with the business, nonprofit, education, and labor communities to create more affordable housing in San Mateo County. The proposed Agreement would establish a fixed monthly rate of $3,166.64 to be paid by the City to HEART for the services of Heart staff. 1 Please refer to HEART of SMC’s webpage for further details about the organization. 8 Packet Pg. 104
Pacifica City Council 2
January 08, 2024
The Agreement would terminate on June 30, 2026, unless terminated sooner by the parties. If approved, HEART staff would perform these services for the City as an independent contractor and be supervised and directed by HEART. HEART would provide a total of 358 hours per year for approximately 30 months or until June 30, 2026, which equates to services of a 0.2 full time equivalent (FTE) employee. The services provided with the Agreement are critical to accomplishing the robust work program set forth in the Draft Housing Element.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

Approval of the proposed Agreement is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. and the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15000 et. seq.), including without limitation, Public Resources Code section 21065 and California Code of Regulations 15378 as this is not a “project” that may cause a direct, or reasonably foreseeable indirect, physical change in the environment as it is an administrative action.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

The Council could choose to not approve the proposed Agreement or Authorize a different amount for the proposed Agreement and direct staff to present a modified agreement to the consultants and other participating San Mateo County cities. Authorization of a modified contract amount whether reduced or increased will require the Planning Department staff to discuss a new contract amount with HEART of San Mateo County and participating San Mateo County Cities. However, the contract amount was reviewed and considered sufficient by multiple San Mateo County Cities and the consultants as the amount was based on the estimated annual cost of a new 0.2 full time employee (FTE) of a HEART employee and a new estimated contract amount would need further fiscal evaluation by HEART of San Mateo County. In addition, if the proposed agreement would be denied then potential delays in program implementation action for the Housing Element would be probable, which would effect timely progress reports to the State.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

The proposed Agreement for consultant services to perform housing-related assistance is consistent with the following item(s) in the Council-adopted Strategic Plan and Priority Work Plan for FY 2023-2030:
• Goal 3: Prioritize protection and development of affordable housing. o Strategy C: Prioritize Housing Element program implementation.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total cost of this Agreement is approximately $100,000 over 30 months between execution and June 30, 2026. Funds for this Agreement are already included in the Planning Department’s Fiscal Year 2023-2024 (FY 2023-24) budget for housing-related activities. The City Council will need to appropriate funding in subsequent fiscal years to allow continued participation in the Agreement.

ORIGINATED BY:

Planning Department
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment A: Interagency Agreement -Pacifica- Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) (PDF)
8 Packet Pg. 105
Pacifica City Council 3
January 08, 2024
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA APPROVING A

CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE HOUSING ENDOWMENT AND REGIONAL TRUST (“HEART”) OF SAN MATEO COUNTY FOR HOUSING RELATED

ACTIVITIES, ASSIGNMENTS AND RELATED SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, the City is a member of the Housing Endowment and Regional Trust of San Mateo County (hereinafter “HEART”), which is a Joint Powers Authority (“JPA”) established by the County of San Mateo and those cities and towns within the County (“Member Agencies”) dated May 13, 2003, as amended by the First Amended Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (“First Amended JPA Agreement”) dated September 9, 2008; and WHEREAS, the City and other Member Agencies are looking for ways to manage the workload relating to establishing and carrying out new housing programs identified in housing elements; and
WHEREAS, the First Amended JPA Agreement authorizes HEART to facilitate and assist Member Agencies to operate, regulate, maintain, facilitate the planning and study of appropriate housing programs, projects and housing management practices; and WHEREAS, the City, as a Member Agency of HEART, wishes to engage HEART to utilize their services to obtain assistance in carrying out its housing programs.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pacifica that it hereby approves a Consultant Services Agreement with the Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (“HEART”) of San Mateo County for housing related activities assignments and related services.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Manager is authorized to execute then Agreement in the form attached hereto, with minor revisions that may be approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, and to execute any other necessary documents to effectuate the terms of the Agreement.
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 8th day of January, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:

Sue Vaterlaus, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
8 Packet Pg. 106
Pacifica City Council 4
January 08, 2024
______________________________ ______________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 8 Packet Pg. 107
1 CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE HOUSING

ENDOWMENT AND REGIONAL TRUST OF SAN MATEO COUNTY

AND THE CITY OF PACIFICA
This Agreement is made and entered into this 21
st day of November 2023 (the “Effective Date”), by
and between the Housing Endowment and Regional Trust of San Mateo County (hereinafter "HEART"), and the City of Pacifica (hereinafter "City") (HEART and City will be referred tocollectively herein as the “Parties”).

RECITALS
WHEREAS, HEART is a Joint Powers Authority (“JPA”) established by the County of San Mateo (“County”) and those cities and towns within the County (“Member Agencies”), via the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (“JPA Agreement”) dated May 13, 2003, as amended and superseded by the First Amended Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (“First Amended JPA Agreement”) dated September 9, 2008; and WHEREAS, Member Agencies have adopted housing elements identifying new housing programs and efforts, and need support to carry out these programs; and WHEREAS, the workload to manage Members Agencies’ housing programs is sporadic, inconsistent and does not lend itself to each Member Agency hiring housing staff; and WHEREAS, the First Amended JPA Agreement authorizes HEART to facilitate and assist Member Agencies to operate, regulate, maintain, facilitate the planning, and study appropriate housing programs, projects, and housing management practices; and
WHEREAS, City is a Member Agency of HEART and wishes to engage HEART to render certain services to assist in carrying out its housing programs; and WHEREAS, HEART and City have agreed for HEART to provide to City qualified individuals, with the skill set to perform the requisite services, based on the terms and conditions as set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1. PROJECT COORDINATION/DESCRIPTION.

The HEART Executive Director, or appropriate designee, is hereby designated the Manager for HEART, and the Planning Director or their designee, is hereby designated the City Project Manager for City. The City Project Manager shall monitor, review, and approve the progress and execution of the work as described in the Scope of Work in Exhibit A of this Agreement. The Manager shall supervise all housing and housing related activities and assignments carried out under this Agreement by HEART staff.

2. HEART Housing STAFF.

A. HEART will assign to the City one or more HEART staff to provide the work and/or materials as generally described in the Scope of Services (the “Work”). In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between the text of the main body of this Agreement and Exhibit A, the text of the main body of this Agreement shall prevail.

B. Parties acknowledge and agree that HEART will endeavor to provide consistent weekly work progress on assignments, but parties acknowledge that the actual timing of Work will ebb and flow based on the City’s needs and the needs of other cities. HEART will provide approximately

8.a
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Attachment A: Interagency Agreement -Pacifica- Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) (5544 : HEART of SMC 2 358 work hours during the term of this Agreement to execute the Work.

C. HEART will assign HEART staff to perform the Work under this Agreement, and may assign different individuals as it sees fit, subject to Paragraph E in this section and subject to the terms and notice requirements set forth below.

D. HEART staff shall perform the Work required pursuant to this Agreement in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the types of work. HEART staff shall devote such time to the performance of the Work pursuant to this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary to meet the standard of performance described in Exhibit A. HEART shall provide quarterly reports listing the major tasks worked on for the City and the total hours spent performing work for City.

E. Assignment of HEART staff to provide the Work is at the sole discretion of HEART. In the event that City or HEART, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires the reassignment of staff, City and HEART shall meet and discuss in good faith to address the issue of concern, including but not limited to reassigning such person or persons. Manager will attempt to accommodate City’s requests to assign, or to not assign, specific staff to certain projects. In the event the assigned employee’s employment with HEART ends or there is an extended leave of absence, HEART will endeavor to secure and assign a replacement employee to fill that role at the first opportunity.

F. At any time, HEART staff may be providing services to one or more cities concurrent with the Work being provided to City under this Agreement.

G. HEART staff assigned may require access to City’s computer systems and networks to complete the assigned Work. City shall provide access to these systems according to its policies for external consultants or provide other reasonable means of access necessary for the HEART staff to perform the Work being provided under this Agreement. HEART requires its employees to agree to appropriate system usage policies, which include a pledge not to use City’s electronic equipment for anything other than City work. The City may require the HEART staff to sign the City’s electronic technology use and confidentiality policies.

H. The parties agree to cooperate fully and to provide assistance to all relevant parties in the investigation and resolution of any complaints, claims, actions, or proceedings that may be brought by or that may involve assigned employees providing Work under this Agreement.

I. HEART shall, at its sole expense, supply for its employees providing Work to City pursuant to this Agreement any and all benefits, such as worker’s compensation, disability insurance, vacation pay, sick pay, or retirement benefits; obtain and maintain all licenses and permits usual or necessary for performing the Work; pay any and all taxes incurred as a result of the employee(s) compensation, including employment or other taxes; and provide City with proof on demand.

3. COMPENSATION.

In consideration of the Work described in the Scope of Services, City will pay HEART a fixed monthly rate of $3,166.64.

HEART will invoice City $3,166.64 at the end of each month following the Effective Date of this agreement.

However, November and December 2023 will be billed at fifty percent (50%) of the monthly rate. The first end-ofmonth invoice shall be prorated based on the Effective Date as follows: 30 minus Effective Date divided by 30 [(30- Effective Date) / 30)]. City agrees to pay all such invoices within 15 business days of receipt of invoice.

City acknowledges that each monthly invoice will be for a fixed amount each month corresponding to the monthly fee and will not be adjusted up or down based on the number of hours worked by HEART staff.

8.a
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Attachment A: Interagency Agreement -Pacifica- Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) (5544 : HEART of SMC 3 4. TERM OF AGREEMENT.

The Term of this Agreement will start from the Effective Date, and shall continue until June 30, 2026, or until terminated in accordance with Section 5, below.

5. TERMINATION.

A. Either party may terminate this Agreement for cause if a party materially breaches its obligations under this Agreement, and such breach is not cured or corrected within fifteen (15) business days’ written notice to the reasonable satisfaction of the party giving such notice.

B. HEART may terminate the Agreement without cause with six-month notice to City. HEART agrees to cooperate with the City on the transfer of work to City or a third party. Upon receipt of notice of termination by HEART, City shall incur additional obligations under the provision of this Agreement only with the prior written consent of City.

C. City may terminate this agreement without cause with one hundred twenty (120) days notice to HEART. Upon receipt of notice of termination by City, City shall continue to incur financial obligations under the provision of this Agreement for one hundred twenty (120) days. This financial obligation may be waived by HEART if the HEART staff can be assigned to another city. Upon termination by City, HEART will diligently attempt to assign the staff to another city.

6. INDEMNITY.

A. To the fullest extent permitted by law, City shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify HEART, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and/or employees from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage, or injury in law or equity for injuries to persons and/or damage to property, and/or economic damages which arise out of or in connection to the performance of this Agreement resulting from the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of City, its officers, agents and/or employees, or the failure to abide by any obligations under thisAgreement.

B. To the fullest extent permitted by law, HEART shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and/or employees from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage, or injury in law or equity for injuries to persons and/ or damage to property, and/ or economic damages which arise out of or in connection to the performance of this Agreement resulting from the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of HEART, its officers, agents, and/ or employees, or the failure to abide by any obligations under this Agreement.

C. In the event of the concurrent negligence of City, its officers, agents and/or employees, and HEART, its officers, agents and/ or employees, then the liability for any and all claims for injuries or damages which arise out of the performance of this Agreement shall be apportioned under California's Theory of Comparative negligence as presently established or may be hereafter modified.

D. The duty to indemnify and hold harmless as set forth by this Section 6 shall include the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code.

7. NOTICES.

All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective Parties in writing and will be delivered to and addressed as follows or to such other place as each Party may designate by subsequent written notice to the other Party. “Written notice” as used herein may include notice by email to the email addresses set forth below, in which case the sending of the email shall satisfy the noticing party’s obligations.

8.a
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Attachment A: Interagency Agreement -Pacifica- Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) (5544 : HEART of SMC 4 HEART: Housing Endowment and Regional Trust of San Mateo County Attn: Executive Director
2905 S. El Camino Real
San Mateo, CA 94403
By email to: [email protected]
With copy to: [email protected] and [email protected] City: City of Pacifica
Attention: Brianne Harkousha
540 Crespi Drive
Pacifica, CA 94044
By email to: Brianne Harkousha, [email protected] With copy to: Christian Murdock, [email protected]
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed by prepaid first class mail on the third day after it was deposited with the United States Postal Service. Notice by email transmission shall be deemed given upon verification of receipt if received before 5:00 p.m. on a regular business day or else on the next business day.

8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.

A. It is understood that this Agreement is solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and gives no right to any other party. No joint venture, agent-principal relationship or partnership is formed as a result of this Agreement. No employee or agents of one party or any of its contractors or subcontractors shall be deemed, or represent themselves to be, employees of the other party.

HEART staff is not authorized to bind City to any contracts or other obligations.

B. HEART shall require employees providing Work under this Agreement to sign agreements acknowledging that they are not City employees and therefore are not entitled to holidays, vacations, disability benefits, insurance, pensions, or retirement plans, or any other benefits offered or provided by City to City employees.

C. For the purposes, and for the duration, of this Agreement, the HEART Manager and any staff assigned to provide Work to City will act in the capacity of an Independent Contractor for City, and not as an employee of City.

D. The parties agree that HEART maintains the authority to direct and oversee the work performed by employees providing Work to City pursuant to this Agreement. City agrees that it shall report to HEART any and all staff issues relating to HEART’s employee(s) so that HEART may take any necessary or appropriate actions pursuant to its policies.

E. HEART represents and warrants that it will comply with all labor laws with respect to its employees providing Work to City under this Agreement.

9. NON-SOLICITATION OF HEART STAFF
During the term of the Agreement, including any extensions thereof, City shall not actively recruit, solicit, or hire any HEART employee assigned by HEART to perform Work for City for the period of this Agreement and for one year thereafter. This shall in no way, however, be construed to restrict, limit, or encumber the rights of any employee granted by law, nor shall it in any way restrict either party from hiring employees who respond to advertisements, or make independent inquiries, for employment.

8.a
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Attachment A: Interagency Agreement -Pacifica- Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) (5544 : HEART of SMC 5 10. INSURANCE
A. Prior to beginning the Work and continuing throughout the term of this Agreement, HEART shall, at HEART’s sole cost and expense, furnish City with certificates of insurance evidencing that HEART has obtained and maintains insurance in the following amounts:
i. Workers’ Compensation that satisfies the minimum statutory limits. The Workers’ Compensation coverage shall be endorsed with or include a waiver of subrogation in favor of City for all Work performed by HEART and its staff. ii. Commercial General Liability and Property Damage Insurance in an amount not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence, ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) annual aggregate, for bodily injury, property damage, products, completed operations and contractual liability coverage. The policy shall also include coverage for liability arising out of the use and operation of any Cityowned or City-furnished equipment used or operated by HEART and its staff. iii. Comprehensive automobile insurance in an amount not less than THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($300,000) per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage including coverage for owned and non-owned vehicles.

B. Each of the following shall be included in the coverage or added as an endorsement:
i. City and its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be covered as additional covered parties with respect to HEART’s general commercial, and automobile coverage for claims, demands, and causes of action arising out of or relating to HEART’s performance of this Agreement and to the extent caused by HEART’s negligent act, error, or omission.
ii. An endorsement to HEART’s general commercial and automobile coverages must state that coverage is primary with respect to City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers.
iii. All coverages shall be on an occurrence or an accident basis, and not on a claims-made basis.

C. HEART shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its coverage or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.

D. During the term of this Agreement, HEART may change the insurance program in which it participates. HEART will provide reasonable notice of any such change to City and replacement copies of Certificates of Coverage and endorsements.

E. The coverages stated herein shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement and proof of coverage shall be available for inspection by City upon request.

F. In the event that any coverage required by this section is reduced, limited, or materially affected in any other manner, HEART shall provide written notice to City at HEART earliest possible opportunity and in no case later than five (5) business days after HEART is notified of the change in coverage.

11. MISCELLANEOUS
A. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS; NONDISCRIMINATION.

HEART and its staff shall comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws, regulations, and ordinances in the performance of this Agreement. HEART shall not discriminate in the provision of service or in the employment of persons engaged in the performance of this Agreement on account of race, color, national

8.a
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Attachment A: Interagency Agreement -Pacifica- Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) (5544 : HEART of SMC 6 origin, ancestry, religion, gender, marital status, sexual orientation, age, physical or mental disability in violation of any applicable local, state, or federal laws or regulations.

B. VENUE, ATTORNEYS’ FEES.

Any suit or action initiated by either party shall be brought in San Mateo County, California. In that event each party shall incur its own attorney’s fees, costs, or other legal expenses to enforce provisions of this Agreement against the other party, regardless of whether any party shall be deemed the prevailing party.

C. RECORDS
i. All final versions of reports, data, maps, models, charts, studies, surveys, photographs, memoranda, plans, studies, specifications, records, files, or any other documents or materials, in electronic or any other form, that HEART prepares or obtains pursuant to this Agreement and that relate to the matters covered hereunder shall be the property of City. HEART hereby agrees to deliver those documents to City upon termination of the Agreement, if requested. It is understood and agreed that the documents and other materials, including but not limited to those described above, prepared pursuant to this Agreement are prepared specifically for City and are not necessarily suitable for any future or other use. ii. HEART shall hold any confidential information received from City in the course of performing this Agreement in trust and confidence and will not reveal such confidential information to any person or entity, either during the term of the Agreement or at any time thereafter. Upon expiration of this Agreement, or termination as provided herein, HEART shall return materials which contain any confidential information to City. For purposes of this paragraph, confidential information is defined as all information disclosed to HEART which relates to City past, present, and future activities, as well as activities under this Agreement, which information is not otherwise of public record under California law.

City shall notify HEART what information and documents are confidential and thus subject to this Section. iii. HEART shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for Work or expenditures and disbursements charged to City under this Agreement for a minimum of 3 years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment under this Agreement. iv. Inspection and Audit of Records. Any records or documents that this Section requires HEART to maintain shall be made available for inspection, audit, and/or copying at any time during regular business hours, upon oral or written request of City.

D. ENTIRE AGREEMENT – AMENDMENTS.
i. The terms and conditions of this Agreement, all exhibits attached, and all documents expressly incorporated by reference, represent the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement.
ii. This written Agreement shall supersede any and all prior agreements, oral or written, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement.
iii. No other agreement, promise or statement, written or oral, relating to the subject matter of this Agreement, shall be valid or binding, except by way of a written amendment to this Agreement. iv. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written Agreement signed by both Parties.

E. SEVERABILITY.

If any provisions of this Agreement are held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this

8.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Attachment A: Interagency Agreement -Pacifica- Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) (5544 : HEART of SMC 7 Agreement shall not be affected thereby if such remainder would continue to serve the purposes and objectives originally contemplated by theParties.

F. REMEDIES, CHOICE OF LAW.

No remedy or election exercised hereunder shall be deemed exclusive but shall be cumulative with all other remedies at law or in equity. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.

G. MEDIATION.

Should any dispute arise out of this Agreement, the parties shall meet in mediation and attempt to reach a resolution with the assistance of a mutually acceptable mediator. Neither party shall be permitted to file legal action without first meeting in mediation and making a good faith attempt to reach a mediated resolution. The costs of the mediator, if any, shall be paid equally by the parties. If a mediated settlement is reached, neither party shall be deemed the prevailing party for purposes of the settlement and each party shall bear its own legalcosts.

H. WAIVER
No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel or otherwise.

I. AUTHORITY TO ENTER AGREEMENT
Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party. [SIGNATURE CONTINUES NEXT PAGE]

8.a
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Attachment A: Interagency Agreement -Pacifica- Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) (5544 : HEART of SMC 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day, month, and year first above written.

HEART

HOUSING ENDOWMENT AND REGIONAL TRUST OF
SAN MATEO COUNTY, a Joint Powers Agency (“JPA”)
formed and existing under the laws of the State of California By: ______________________________
Armando F. Sanchez, Executive Director
[SIGNATURE CONTINUES NEXT PAGE]

8.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Attachment A: Interagency Agreement -Pacifica- Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) (5544 : HEART of SMC 9 CITY:

CITY OF PACIFICA, a municipal corporation
By: _________________________________
Name: Keving Woodhouse
Its: City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: ___________________________

8.a
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Attachment A: Interagency Agreement -Pacifica- Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) (5544 : HEART of SMC 10 EXHIBIT A – Scope of Work
HEART and City will further refine the work plan and scope of services. Activities and services to be performed by HEART may include, but not be limited, to the following:

WORK PLAN DEVELOPMENT
• Consult with City to establish objectives, priorities and schedules for affordable housing programs and activities.
• Work with City to identify services and activities that will continue to be met through City staff and/or other contracted services/consultants.
• Establish monitoring and reporting systems to ensure the adequacy, quality, and timeliness of progress on housing programs and activities.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT: INCLUSIONARY/BELOW MARKET RATE (“BMR”) HOUSING • Review existing City inclusionary housing ordinances and procedures and make recommendations for improvements that will help City meet production and fair housing goals set out in the Housing Element.
• Establish and begin implementation of policies and procedures related to legal agreements, marketing, preferences, and lease-ups or sales that improve operations and the process for applicants and residents while also adhering to industry standards in terms of fair housing marketing principles and eligibility determinations.
• Establish systems to monitor BMR units for ongoing eligibility and affordability. • Establish procedures and systems to assure the efficient leasing of BMR rental units upon turnover. • Establish and begin implementation of policies and procedures for resale and subordination requests related to BMR ownership units.
• Track all inclusionary housing activity including project status, marketing timelines, lease-ups, sales, and re-sales.
• Identify, solicit, recommend, and prepare contracts with consultants, as needed.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT: 100% AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS • Review compliance activities, including the monitoring of regulatory agreements and performance of administrative tasks as requested by the City related to its affordable housing loan portfolio. • Recommend and prepare policies and procedures related to the use of local funds for the development of 100% affordable housing, including developer selection criteria. • Research and inform the City of affordable housing funding and financing sources, guidelines, and deadlines.
• Review and evaluate affordable housing proposals and make recommendations regarding project selection to the City Council.
• Assist City with disposition of City owned properties for the production of affordable housing, including selection of a developer, assistance with project approval, and assistance with funding applications, while assuring compliance with State laws related to property disposition. • Attend meetings and make presentations to City staff, City Council, administrators, and various private and community organizations to discuss project status, as necessary. • Review existing affordable housing agreements and assist the City with efforts to preserve existing income restricted housing threatened by rehabilitation needs or expiring affordability agreements.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT
In consultation with City, HEART may undertake additional activities intended to implement the Housing Element and the City’s housing goals including, but not limited to:
• Assist City with the completion of State required Annual Progress Reports. • Draft an application to the State for a Pro-Housing Designation. • Develop and begin implementation of monitoring procedures for Accessory Dwelling Units. • Advise City on the establishment of a fund to support housing production.

8.a
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attachment A: Interagency Agreement -Pacifica- Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) (5544 : HEART of SMC 11 • Advise City on the use of local funds for programs that support resident stability such as rental assistance, relocation assistance, eviction prevention, home repairs, and foreclosure prevention. • Assure that the City web site includes information on fair housing, housing resources, and services and recommend adding information as needed.
• Prepare and make information available to City residents on housing-related questions. • Implement other Housing Element goals, as defined by the City.

MONITORING EVOLVING STATE AND FEDERAL GUIDELINES AND RESOURCES • Review and prepare memos on proposed Federal and State regulations and their prospective impact on local requirements and programs, and suggest alternative courses of action, as applicable. • Provide updates to City elected officials regarding details on State and Federal requirements. • Maintain an awareness of the availability, guidelines, and deadlines for federal and state affordable housing funding sources.

8.a
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attachment A: Interagency Agreement -Pacifica- Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) (5544 : HEART of SMC

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/8/2024
1 SUBJECT:

Resolution Authorizing a Contract Extension with Creative Digital Agency for Continuing Marketing Services
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Move to adopt a Resolution approving a one year extension to consultant services agreement between the City and Creative Digital Agency (CDA) to continue providing marketing services and authorize City Manager to execute the necessary amendments not to exceed the budget authority of $75,000, with an option to extend for two additional years at City Manager's discretion.

STAFF CONTACT:

Yulia Carter, Assistant City Manager
(650) 501-6004
[email protected]
Tara G. Schiff, Economic Development Manager
(650)501-6007
[email protected]
BACKGROUND:

On December 13, 2021, the City Council held a joint Study Session with the Economic Development Committee (EDC) on the Vision 2025 & Beyond study. This discussion included a presentation of the Pacifica Marketing Report & Gap Analysis and a review of the 14 Economic Development marketing opportunities in Pacifica identified in the report prepared by the Creative Digital Agency (CDA). CDA is a full-service marketing firm that provides marketing services to several Bay Area cities and counties to assist them in their economic development, marketing, and hospitality efforts.

City Council directed staff to proceed with the development of a 2-Year Marketing Plan with CDA to prioritize work on the Shop Pacifica and Workcations marketing opportunities identified in the study.

In February 2022, the City Council approved a two-year agreement with CDA, funded by the one-time ARPA funds for implementation of the economic development marketing plan. The following priority work areas (opportunities) were identified to be the initial focus of this engagement:

1. Shop Pacifica eGift Card Program to launch the shop local investments in Pacifica’s economy.

2. Workcations opportunity to bring additional visitors and revenue to hotels in Pacifica. 9 Packet Pg. 119
Pacifica City Council 2
January 08, 2024

3. Social Media opportunity with a focus on improving Pacifica’s social media reach to market the City, including better use of Instagram as well as blogs, newsletters, influencers, and other social media tools.

4. Banners opportunity to target residents and visitors at Palmetto Avenue, providing local foot traffic audience awareness for the Shop Pacifica program and upcoming events.

DISCUSSION:

The two-year contract will expire in February 2024 and staff is recommending an agreement renewal for one year at this time to continue services without interruption while staff is pursuing the alternative funding sources for an ongoing Marketing program.

To better track the progress of their work, CDA tracked the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) over the two-year term and prepared a detailed analysis and explanation of performance measures (Attachments A and B).

Below is the summary of the key accomplishments of the Marketing Plan implementation:

1. Implementation of Shop Pacifica eGift Card Program, powered by Yiftee, the local Bay Area company based in Menlo Park launched in late 2021. All Pacifica businesses with a current business license were eligible to participate in the program to accept Shop Pacifica gift cards (backed by Visa card) from their customers. Local businesses and community organizations were also invited to promote the program by providing Shop Pacifica Gift Cards to their employees as holiday gifts, special recognitions and other incentives.

To date, 56 local businesses are registered for the program, and consumers have a diverse range of shopping options to utilize their Shop Pacifica cards from restaurants and cafes to spa salons and retail shops, injecting additional revenues in Pacifica’s local economy. In partnership with CDA, City staff successfully launched the program and ran a series of promotions throughout the year, including a “Buy One, Get One” (BOGO) program, Restaurant Week, Valentine’s Day promo, and Teacher’s appreciation campaign.

The Shop Pacifica Gift Cards can only be used in Pacifica at participating businesses, guaranteeing that the gift card funds stay in the community and benefit Pacifica's local businesses. Since the start of the Shop Pacifica program, the City distributed 2,340 egift cards, including 1,688 purchased cards and 652 bonus cards valued at $25,390 (funded by ARPA) that resulted in a total additional new revenue of $89,195 inserted into local economy directly benefitting the local business community.

2. Workcation - The Pacifica Workcations program was launched in the Summer of 2023 as a pilot program with a very limited budget of $3,500. The City’s hotels generally stay busy during the weekends and summer months, so the Workcation program focused on increasing revenues from midweek stays during the offseason. The rise of the remote work population provided an opportunity to generate additional mid-week one-plus-night stays at the local hotels. The idea of workcation was to build a campaign to inspire remote workers to escape the boundaries of their home office and instead work remotely with ocean views in one of Pacifica hotels, reinventing their lunch break by doing hiking or surfing, or taking advantage of everything Pacifica’s nature has to offer. The 9 Packet Pg. 120
Pacifica City Council 3
January 08, 2024
campaign also incorporated the Shop Pacifica program by incentivizing remote workers with a free $50 Shop Pacifica gift card (funded by ARPA) that they could spend in over 50 locations around the City when booking two or more nights Monday to Thursday.

Over three months of this pilot, the program resulted in 42 mid-week workcation reservations, injecting about $48,100 into the local economy, in the form of direct hotel rent revenues ($32,900) and projected visitor spending at local businesses ($15,200).

An estimated additional revenue (approx. $10,000) are included in the figure above to account for return visitors with remaining gift card balance, assuming they chose to come back for a one-night return visit. The pilot program has proven to successfully increase mid-week hotel occupancy in the City, resulting in the increase in Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), and related increase in Sales Tax as a result of additional overnight visitors’ spending. The City has realized a return on investments of approximately $5,400 from this three-month pilot program in the form of additional TOT and Sales Tax revenues.

To help promote the program, a website showcasing Pacifica hotels was created and Shop Pacifica “giveaways” were advertised through regional paid media partnerships and various digital channels and PR sources. The comprehensive review and analysis of this pilot program will help design a successful ongoing version of the Workcation program, once the ongoing funding mechanism is identified.

3. Media/Social Media Coverage - The City’s long-term regional awareness of Pacifica has grown through ongoing PR outreach to Bay Area television, print, and digital media outlets, as well as utilizing the City’s Facebook and Instagram profiles, highlighting businesses, events, and cultural & natural attractions. During the holiday seasons of 2022 and 2023, Bay Area television stations broadcasted live from Palmetto Avenue to highlight the “Shop Small Saturday” event with local businesses. Several Pacifica small business owners reported a significant increase in sales from the broadcasts.

4. Banners on Palmetto - With the CDA’s creative design assistance, the City coordinated the implementation, design/production and installation of 28 light post banners on Palmetto Avenue. The banners highlighted the Shop Pacifica Program and included a scannable QR code for interested consumers.

Recommendation:

To capitalize on the success of these marketing initiatives and continue the Media/Social Media Coverage, which should be an ongoing effort to highlight and promote the City, the City Manager recommends a one-year contract extension to continue marketing services with CDA without interruption. Since the ARPA funds that originally funded these marketing efforts are no longer available, staff is actively pursuing alternative funding sources to support the City’s ongoing marketing program. Staff is researching funding opportunities, including, but not limited to various Economic Development Grants, possibility of using future BID assessments to fund visitor-related marketing services (would require the BID approval), pro-bono work from local marketing experts and interns, etc. The City Manager is also requesting Council authorization to execute an optional extension of this agreement for two additional years if/when alternate funding sources (other than General Funds) have been identified, and if no changes in the scope of engagement are made. Any substantial change in the scope of the marketing program, such as an increase or expansion of marketing services, would require the Council’s approval as part of the new agreement.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
9 Packet Pg. 121
Pacifica City Council 4
January 08, 2024
City Council may revise or modify the Staff recommendations and reconsider the contract renewal.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

This item furthers the City Council’s Strategic Goal and the City’s efforts to “Enhance Organizational and Fiscal Stability”.

Successful Marketing Programs improve the City’s fiscal stability by providing a return on investment (ROI) to the City in the form of increased Sales Tax, BLT and TOT revenues, in addition to helping local businesses thrive. An effective, comprehensive, and ongoing marketing plan will help boost the local economy and increase the City’s revenue base to be able to adequately fund City general services.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total fiscal impact from the one-year extension of Economic Development marketing contract with CDA is $75,000. The FY 2023-24 impact will be approximately $30,000. If this item is approved this amount will be added during the mid-year budget review, and the remaining $45,000 will be included to the FY 2024-25 General Fund Base budget.

Staff is also researching alternative sources to fund the City’s ongoing Marketing program in the future and will renew and may revise and expand the scope of the Marketing priorities when such sources are identified. Any revisions to the scope of the program will be brought back to Council for approval.

ORIGINATED BY:

City Manager's Office
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Memo CDA (PDF)
Pacifica Marketing Impact - CDA (PDF)
9 Packet Pg. 122
Pacifica City Council 5
January 08, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. ___-2024

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA

APPROVING A ONE YEAR EXTENSION TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY AND CREATIVE DIGITAL AGENCY TO CONTINUE PROVIDING

MARKETING SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City conducted a Marketing and Gap Analysis study and identified 14 marketing opportunities for Pacifica.

WHEREAS, the City entered into agreement with Creative Digital Agency in February 2022 to
develop and implement a two-year marketing plan prioritizing four marketing opportunities (Shop Pacifica, Workcation, social media, and banners) previously identified in the study.

WHEREAS, the City desires to capitalize on the success of these marketing initiatives to continue marketing services with CDA without interruption.

WHEREAS, the City is pursuing alternative funding sources to fund the ongoing marketing program since the ARPA funds that financed the initial engagement are no longer available.

NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, to authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary amendments to extend the existing contract with Creative Digital Agency by one additional year, not exceeding the budget authority of $75,000, with an option to extend for two additional years at the City Manager’s discretion. • • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 8th day of January, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:

Sue Vaterlaus, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ______________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 9 Packet Pg. 123
Celebrating Pacifica's Strong Economic Recovery and the Impact of the City Marketing Initiative
Dear Members of the Pacifica City Council,
It has been a joy to work with the outstanding team at the City of Pacifica over the past two years, communicating and collaborating with local businesses and organizations to launch exciting new programs that have made a meaningful and positive impact on the quality of life of Pacifica residents and business owners.

CDA was brought onboard in late 2021 to audit the City’s marketing efforts, resources, and opportunities. In February of 2022, the scope of our relationship was expanded to include hands-on marketing services, especially:

1. Launching and greatly expanding engagement and revenue from the Shop Pacifica eGift card program

2. Piloting the Pacifica Workations Program

3. Providing creative production services, including designing and installing new banners along Palmetto

4. Expanding the reach and impact of the City’s Facebook and Instagram profiles, and providing year-round PR services to promote events, businesses, and attractions The objective of these efforts was to boost local and visitor spending, thereby supporting the City’s wonderful and unique local businesses while also bringing in an excellent return on investment for the city’s essential sales tax and TOT (hotel tax) revenues.

1. Launching and greatly expanding engagement and revenue from the Shop Pacifica eGift card program
Shop Pacifica is a community eGift card program that encourages local spending, and it has risen steadily in popularity with local merchants and the public alike in the past two years.

The city leveraged CDA to bring the Shop Pacifica eGift card program from concept to reality, through a number of important activities. CDA first produced the branding, creative designs, and messaging for the program, as well as the strategy and outreach to engage merchants and the public.

Next, CDA produced a substantial volume of informational and marketing content, both for the shoppers that would buy the cards, and also the many merchants learning to use the program for the first time. This included the creation of printable materials for the various point of sale systems to aid merchants’ new employees in redeeming the cards when a shopper presented one.

9.a
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Memo CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing marketing se) Extensive phone and email outreach was performed by CDA, and an interactive webinar was hosted for interested merchants to help grow participation and enthusiasm throughout the business community while answering any concerns and questions.

CDA’s eorts helped the program grow from 10 merchants in December of 2021, to 20 merchants by February of 2022, to 53 merchants as of December, 2023.

At the same time, CDA has worked with the business community to coordinate and execute a number of marketing campaigns for the program, bringing in $89,200 in revenue to local businesses. This is double the city’s total investment to date in the program, including CDA’s eorts, all advertising spend, and promotional “BOGO” funds. **Figure 1: Shop Pacifica Results to Date**
**Figure 2: Shop Pacifica Return on Investment**

2. Successfully piloting the Pacifica Workations Program The Pacifica Workations program was launched in the Summer of 2023 to support Pacifica hotels and reduce the number of vacant hotel rooms during the work week. Hotels were onboarded, and a brief marketing campaign was launched in 2023 to test/pilot the program. At least 48 multi-day room reservations were made during this initial pilot that could be directly attributed to the Workations campaign, creating approximately $32,904 in new revenue for hotels, and a projected $15,199 in new spending at other local merchants from these visitors, for a total of more than $48,000 injected into the local economy.

The website Marketing Sherpa even published an article on the program’s success. **Figure 3: Pacifica Workations Return on Investment**
Together, the Shop Pacifica and Pacifica Workations programs accounted for $133,000 in local spending, with engagement and enthusiasm for both programs continuing to grow within the community.

3. Providing creative production services, including designing and installing new banners along Palmetto
In addition to the work done for Shop Pacifica and the Pacifica Workations programs, CDA has provided ongoing graphic design and video editing services for the city of Pacifica, including the creation of sponsorship presentations, social media content, event promotions, ad campaigns, email marketing graphics, and the design and installation of the new banners displayed along Palmetto.

9.a
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Memo CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing marketing se)

4. Expanding the reach and impact of the City’s Facebook and Instagram profiles, and providing year-round PR services to promote events, businesses, and attractions Through ongoing PR outreach to TV, print, and digital media outlets, as well as curation of the City’s Facebook and Instagram profiles, CDA has continued to build long-term regional awareness and excitement for Pacifica’s businesses, events, and cultural & natural attractions.

CDA doubled the total followers/subscribers for the city’s social media accounts, quadrupled the number of people being reached, and greatly increased public interest and the amount of discourse about the city on social media, as seen by an increase in the volume of key hashtags related to Pacifica by 50%.
**Figure 4: City Social Media**
**Figure 5: Public Interest**
In addition, CDA brought the City of Pacifica to the attention of Visit California, creating a new page on the Visit California website for Pacifica, and also working closely with the Visit California PR team to get the city’s attractions and businesses consistently promoted in Visit California’s articles - 18 times in 22 months.
**Figure 6: Visit California**
Other PR efforts during this time drove numerous “best of” and “places to visit” features in travel publications, as well as coverage of city events on local broadcast television news. In total, CDA was responsible for 795 pieces of media coverage and more than 16 million estimated digital views.
**Figure 7: Travel Articles**
**Figure 8: TV Event Coverage**
**Figure 8: PR Media Exposure**
Figures 9-11, included in the attached PDF, show a “before and after” of how the City’s cumulative efforts – including the important marketing activities performed by CDA – contributed to significant post-pandemic sales tax and TOT (hotel tax) recovery between Fiscal Year 21 and FY 234:
**Figure 9: Sales Tax Revenue, Before and After**
**Figure 10: TOT (Hotel Tax) Revenue, Before and After** **Figure 11: Combined Sales Tax + TOT Revenue, Before and After** It is important to note that this recovery happened despite all the visitor-generated revenue that was lost to communities near San Francisco over the past two years, due to San

9.a
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Memo CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing marketing se) Francisco’s own tourism dropping significantly even after the pandemic (and with it, the pool of prospective visitors coming to Pacifica).

The entire community should take immense pride in these extraordinary results, and we extend our heartfelt appreciation to the City staff, local business leaders, non-profit organizations, and many others for their unwavering involvement and community spirit.

Figure 4, included in the attached PDF, illustrates how the City’s total investment in CDA accounts for less than 4% of this annual revenue increase. **Figure 12: Return on Investment**
While many factors have played a part in Pacifica’s strong recovery, we are confident that the City marketing program spearheaded by CDA has played a vital role. The CDA contract is ending on January 31st, 2024. It is our hope that we can continue to work with the City moving forward, building upon the foundation we have worked hard to establish.

In closing, we want to express our gratitude to the City Council for giving us this opportunity and supporting the economic recovery of the community. Together, we are confident that we can make an even stronger impact in years to come. We look forward to being a part of Pacifica’s continued growth and success, and the continued success of local merchants. **Figure 13: Merchant Testimonial**
All the best,
Kevin Almeida
Managing Director, Creative Digital Agency, Inc.

9.a
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Memo CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing marketing se)

9.b
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Pacifica Marketing Impact - CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing

9.b
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Pacifica Marketing Impact - CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing

9.b
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Pacifica Marketing Impact - CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing

9.b
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Pacifica Marketing Impact - CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing

9.b
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Pacifica Marketing Impact - CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing

9.b
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Pacifica Marketing Impact - CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing

9.b
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Pacifica Marketing Impact - CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing

9.b
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Pacifica Marketing Impact - CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing

9.b
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Pacifica Marketing Impact - CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing

9.b
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Pacifica Marketing Impact - CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing

9.b
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Pacifica Marketing Impact - CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing

9.b
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Pacifica Marketing Impact - CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing

9.b
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Pacifica Marketing Impact - CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing

9.b
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Pacifica Marketing Impact - CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing

9.b
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Pacifica Marketing Impact - CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing

9.b
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Pacifica Marketing Impact - CDA (5549 : Resolution authorizing a contract extension with Creative Digital Agency for continuing

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/8/2024
1 SUBJECT:

Resolution - Approving Master Agreement For Consulting Services with Woodard & Curran for Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt a Resolution that:

A. Authorizes the City Manager to award and execute a Master Agreement For Consulting Services and Task Order No. 1 with Woodard & Curran, Inc. for sole source services and for providing engineering services for the Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project; and B. Appropriates $75,070.50 from Fund 34 Wastewater Sewer CIP fund balance to Sewer System Master Plan Project (C007); and
C. Approves a total project budget of $91,953 which includes 15% contingency in the amount of $11,994; and
D. Authorizes the City Manager to execute all documents related to the project and future task orders not to exceed the project budget amount.

STAFF CONTACT:

Daniel Patten, P.E., Engineering Manager (Wastewater)
(650) 922-7248
[email protected]
Louis Sun, P.E., Public Works Deputy Director - Wastewater (650) 738-4660
[email protected]
Lisa Petersen, P.E., Director of Public Works
(650) 738-3770
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The City of Pacifica completed its latest Wastewater Collection System Master Plan in August of 2021. Since this Master Plan has been completed, the City of Pacifica has experienced significantly wetter winters in 2021/22 and 2022/23. The City’s Wastewater Collection System and Calera Creek Water Recycling Plant (CCWRP) had much higher wastewater flows than anticipated. Wastewater flow measurements used to develop the computer models of the collection system were taken during comparatively drier years, and thus the models may not be as accurate for wastewater flows during wetter winters.

Sanitary sewers from the Vallemar and Rockaway neighborhoods drain into the Rockaway 10 Packet Pg. 144
Pacifica City Council 2
January 08, 2024
Pump Station (Rockaway Catchment Area), and wastewater is pumped into the CCWRP for treatment. The City’s Wastewater Capital Improvements Plan includes the Vallemar and Rockaway Beach Blvd Rehabilitation and Repair Projects to maintain the reliability of the collection system in these neighborhoods. To better evaluate the Rockaway Pump Station during these wet season flows, further assessment is needed. An updated collection system model of this area will help the City plan future capital improvements projects, identify areas of risk and plan for future private development.

This project will include the following tasks:

Task 1 - Flow Monitoring - Woodard & Curran’s subconsultant will conduct temporary monitoring within the Rockaway Pump Station catchment area. Monitoring data will be collected for a period of up to three (3) months.

Task 2 - Hydraulic Model Recalibration and Capacity Evaluation Woodard & Curran will use the flow monitoring data collected under Task 1 to update their computer model for this area.

Task 3 - Technical Memorandum
Woodard & Curran will prepare a brief draft and final Technical Memorandum (TM) summarizing the work completed under Tasks 1 and 2 to document their results.

Task 4 - Project Management
This task covers overall contract management related to this project. An overall six-month task order period is assumed. Woodard & Curran will monitor the project budget and schedule, prepare invoices, and communicate with the City by telephone and e-mail regarding project status and
issues.

Description Date
Council Approval of Engineering Agreement January 8, 2023 Notice to Proceed January 15, 2023
Flow Monitoring January - March 2024
Model Recalibration and TM Preparation April - June 2024 Woodard Curran completed the City’s previous Collection System Master Plan and has built a computer model for the City of Pacifica’s facilities. Woodard & Curran is recommended for a sole source service as it would require significantly more costs and staff time for another consultant to review existing data, collect new data and develop a new computer model for the Rockaway Pump Station catchment area. Woodward & Curran is also an expert in this area of engineering and familiar with Pacifica and the City’s collection system challenges.

Staff recommends this Master Agreement for Consultant Services based on a sole source purchase consistent with the City of Pacifica’s Purchasing Policy (Administrative Policy No. 76) as set forth in Article 7 Exemptions From Competitive Pricing. Section 7.4, Sole Source Purchases, authorizes the City Manager to waive bidding requirements for sole source purchases and services if the City Manager determines sufficient justification exists, and to ensure the City selects the most qualified contractor/vendor to complete the project. All required documentation was submitted along with the proposal. As there are sufficient project funds approved as part of the FY 2023/24 Wastewater budget, the City Manager recommends the award of a Master Agreement for Consultant Services and Task Order No.1 to Woodard & Curran Inc, appropriating $75,070.50 from Fund 34 Wastewater Sewer CIP fund to the project 10 Packet Pg. 145
Pacifica City Council 3
January 08, 2024
and approving a total budget of $91,953, which includes a 15% contingency.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

Council may choose not to approve the Master Agreement for Consultant Services, however, this will result in using a less accurate Wastewater flow model for the City’s Planning, Public Works, and private development projects in the Rockaway and Vallemar neighborhoods.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

Approval of the Master Agreement for Consulting Services and Task Order No.1 is consistent with the following Council adopted Goals:
• Improve and steward City infrastructure, streets and facilities: This project will improve the planning and identification of risk for public and private construction projects in the Rockaway Pump Station catchment area.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The following is the source and use of funds for the project:

Use of Funds
Task Order No. 1 - Engineering Design Services $ 79,959 Contingency (15%) $ 11,994
Total Use of Funds $ 91,953
Project Fund Source
Enterprise Fund (Fund 34) Account No

34.900000.52800.C007.000 Appropriate from
Fund 34 Sewer CIP Fund Balance
$16,882.50
$75,070.50
Total Project Fund Source $91,953
Estimated Project Fund End Balance $0
ORIGINATED BY:

Public Works - Wastewater Division
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project (PDF)
10 Packet Pg. 146
Pacifica City Council 4
January 08, 2024
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA

APPROVING A MASTER AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF PACIFICA AND WOODARD & CURRAN INC. FOR SOLE SOURCE SERVICES

FOR THE ROCKAWAY PUMP STATION HYDRAULIC MODELING PROJECT, APPROPRIATE $91,953 FROM WASTEWATER FUND 34 BALANCE TO SEWER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN PROJECT, APPROVE A TOTAL BUDGET OF $91,953, AND AUTHORIZE

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT NOT

TO EXCEED THE BUDGET AMOUNT
WHEREAS, during the FY 2023-24 budget approval process, the City Council approved funding for Sewer System Master Plan Project; and
WHEREAS, consistent with the City of Pacifica’s Purchasing Policy (Administrative Policy No. 76) as set forth in Article 7 Exemptions From Competitive Pricing, Section 7.4 Sole Source Purchases, authorizes the City Manager to waive bidding requirements for sole source purchases if he/she determines sufficient justification exists, and to ensure the City selected the most qualified contractor/vendor to complete the project; WHEREAS, during the December/January Storm Events and all subsequent storm events in early 2023, the collection system received more flows than anticipated from the previous collection system modeling; and
WHEREAS, an updated collection system model for the Rockaway Pump Station will help the City plan future capital improvements, identify areas of risk in the area and plan for future private development.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pacifica to authorize the City Manager to execute a Master Agreement for Consulting Services and Task Order No. 1 with Woodard & Curran Inc. for consulting sole source services in the amount of $79,959 for the Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project; approve budget authority in the amount of $91,953, which includes 15% contingency in the amount of $11,994; and Authorizing the City Manager to execute all documents related to the Project. • • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 8th day of January, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
10 Packet Pg. 147
Pacifica City Council 5
January 08, 2024
Sue Vaterlaus, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ______________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 10 Packet Pg. 148
OAK #4818-2196-0582 v1

MASTER AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
This Master Agreement for Consultant Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this 8th day of January 2024, by and between THE CITY OF PACIFICA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and Woodard and Curran Inc. a Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"). CITY and CONSULTANT may be referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY requires Flow Monitoring and Hydraulic Modeling services in connection with the Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project; WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified to perform such services; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has agreed to provide CITY with such services on the terms and conditions set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, for the considerations hereinafter set forth, CONSULTANT and CITY agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1 - SCOPE OF SERVICES

1.1. Scope of Services. CONSULTANT agrees to furnish services pursuant to a Task Order in the form set forth in Exhibit A, Task Order, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Services").

1.2. Compliance with Law. The Services shall be performed in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and orders.

1.3. Time is of the Essence. CONSULTANT agrees to diligently prosecute the Services. In the performance of this Agreement, time is of the essence.

1.4. Professional Competence. CONSULTANT represents that it has the professional skills necessary to perform the Services and that it will perform the Services in a skillful and professional manner. CONSULTANT represents that it has all the necessary licenses to perform the Services and shall maintain them throughout the term of this Agreement.

CONSULTANT agrees that the Services shall be performed in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which CONSULTANT is engaged, in the same or similar geographical area in which CONSULTANT practices its profession, and will prepare all work products required by this Agreement in accordance with such standards. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT is in responsible charge of the Services. Acceptance by CITY of the Services does not operate as a release of CONSULTANT from professional responsibility for the Services performed.

10.a
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project

1.5. Independent Contractor. CONSULTANT is an independent contractor and not an employee of CITY. CONSULTANT expressly warrants that it will not represent that it is an employee of CITY. Persons employed or utilized by CONSULTANT in the performance of the Services will not be employees or agents of CITY. CONSULTANT is solely responsible for the payment of employment taxes incurred under this Agreement and any similar federal or state taxes.

1.6. Confidentiality. CONSULTANT agrees to maintain in confidence and not disclose to any person, firm, governmental entity, or corporation, without CITY's prior written consent, any trade secret or confidential information, knowledge or data relating to the products, process, or operation of CITY. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain in confidence and not to disclose to any person, firm, governmental entity, or corporation any data, information, technology, or material developed or obtained by CONSULTANT during the performance of the Services. The covenants contained in this Section 1.6 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for whatever cause.

1.7. Ownership of Material. Except for CONSULTANT?S preexisting proprietary materials, any reports and other material prepared by or on behalf of CONSULTANT under this Agreement (collectively, the "Documents") shall be and remain the property of CITY. All Documents not already provided to CITY shall be delivered to CITY on the date of termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Documents may be used by CITY and its agents, employees, representatives, and assigns, in whole or in part, or in modified form, for all purposes CITY may deem appropriate without further employment of or payment of any compensation to CONSULTANT, provided that any use or reuse other than for the purposes as detailed in this Agreement are taken at the sole risk of the CITY.

1.8. Documentation. CONSULTANT shall keep and maintain full and complete documentation and accounting records, employee time sheets, and correspondence pertaining to the performance of the Services, and CONSULTANT shall make such documents available for review and/or audit by CITY and CITY's representatives at all reasonable times for at least four years after the termination of this Agreement or completion of the Services.

1.9. Testimony. CONSULTANT agrees to testify at CITY's request if litigation is brought against CITY in connection with the Services. Unless the action is brought by CONSULTANT or is based upon CONSULTANT's negligence, CITY will compensate CONSULTANT for the preparation and the testimony at CONSULTANT's standard hourly rates.

ARTICLE 2 - COMPENSATION

2.1. Compensation. Compensation for the Services shall be in accordance with the rate and schedules specified in a Task Order. However, in no event shall the amount the CITY pays to CONSULTANT for work done under a Task Order exceed the total compensation specified in the Task Order (“Cost Ceiling”) of $50,000.00 per Fiscal Year.

If cumulative task orders exceed $50,000.00, Council approval will be required.

10.a
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project

2.2. Invoices. CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices in a form satisfactory to CITY on or before the tenth day of each month for Services provided during the preceding month. CONSULTANT shall submit time and cost records as necessary to substantiate performance of the Services. Within 35 days after receipt of each such invoice, CITY shall verify the accuracy of the invoice, correct the charges where appropriate and as discussed and mutually agreed with CONSULTANT, and make payment to CONSULTANT in an amount equal to the amount of such invoice, as verified or corrected by CITY. No payment hereunder shall be construed as evidence of acceptance of any of CONSULTANT's work. CITY reserves the right to withhold payment from CONSULTANT on account of Services not performed satisfactorily, delays in CONSULTANT's performance of Services, or other defaults hereunder. CONSULTANT shall not stop or delay performance of the Services under this Agreement on account of payment disputes with CITY.

2.3. Status Reports. Together with each monthly invoice, CONSULTANT shall submit a status report detailing the amount expended on the Services to that date and the remaining amount to be expended before the Cost Ceiling is reached. CONSULTANT shall notify CITY in writing when payments have reached 90 percent of the Cost Ceiling.

2.4. Withholding. In lieu of holding retention, CITY shall withhold CONSULTANT's final payment under a Task Order until the Services provided under that Task Order are complete and CITY has received all Documents. CONSULTANT shall diligently continue and complete performance of the Services if the Services are not complete at the time CONSULTANT has performed services up to the Cost Ceiling.

ARTICLE 3 - TIME OF PERFORMANCE

3.1. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective upon execution of the second signature and shall remain in full force and effect until December 31, 2024 (the "Term").

Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement may be extended for successive one-year term(s) upon mutual, written approval by the City Manager or his/her designee and CONSULTANT. Work authorized by a Task Order shall be performed in accordance with the schedule set forth in the Task Order.

3.2. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by CITY upon written notice to CONSULTANT.

3.3. Final Payment. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to compensation for Services performed up to the time of such termination, it being understood that any payments are full compensation for the Services rendered under this Agreement.

3.4. Other Remedies. Nothing in this Article 3 shall be deemed to limit the respective rights of the parties to terminate this Agreement for cause or otherwise to exercise any rights or pursue any remedies which may accrue to them.

ARTICLE 4 - DESIGNATED CONTACTS

10.a
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project

4.1. CITY Contact. CITY designates Dan Patten, its Engineering Manager, as its contact who shall be responsible for administering and interpreting the terms and conditions of this Agreement, for matters relating to CONSULTANT's performance under this Agreement, and for liaison and coordination between CITY and CONSULTANT. In the event CITY wishes to make a change in CITY 's representative, CITY will notify CONSULTANT of the change in writing.

4.2. CONSULTANT Contact. CONSULTANT designates Giza Ju as its contact, who shall have immediate responsibility for the performance of the Services and for all matters relating to performance under this Agreement. Any change in CONSULTANT's designated contact shall be subject to written approval by CITY.

ARTICLE 5 - INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE

5.1. Indemnification. CONSULTANT shall, to the fullest extent allowed by law, with respect to claims, liability, loss, damage, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney's and expert witness fees, awards, fines, penalties, or judgments, arising out of or relating to the Services (collectively "Claims") that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT, defend indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its Officials, officers, employees and agents (the "CITY Parties"), except to the extent the Claims are attributable to CITY Parties' gross negligence or willful misconduct. Consultant shall defend the CITY Parties as required by California Civil Code section 2778, and with counsel reasonably acceptable to those parties. CONSULTANT shall have no right to seek reimbursement from the CITY Parties for the costs of defense. If CONSULTANT is a “design professional,” as defined in California Civil Code Section 2782.8(c), CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold the Indemnitees harmless against Liability only to the extent such Liability arises out of, pertains to, or relates to CONSULTANT?s negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct. In such an event, the cost to defend charged to CONSULTANT shall not exceed CONSULTANT?s proportionate percentage of fault.

The obligations contained in this Section 5.1 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for whatever cause for the full period of time allowed by law and shall not in any way be limited by the insurance requirements of this Agreement.

5.2. Health and Safety. CONSULTANT may perform part of the Services at sites which contain unknown working conditions and contaminated materials. CONSULTANT shall be solely responsible for the health and safety of CONSULTANT's employees during the performance of the Services.

5.3. Insurance. CONSULTANT and all of CONSULTANTS subcontractors, consultants and other agency shall procure, provide and maintain at all times during the performance of this Agreement, and for such additional periods as described herein, the insurance listed below with insurers licensed to do business in the State of California and with a Best's rating of no less than A:VII.

10.a
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project A. Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance. Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance providing bodily injury liability and property damage, to protect against all liability arising out of the use of any owned, leased, passenger or commercial automobile at a minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit and $2,000,000 aggregate. Coverage shall apply to hired and non-owned autos.

B. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Commercial General Liability Insurance, with limits providing a minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage for each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate and $2,000,000 products/completed operations aggregate. The insurance shall cover all operations including but not limited to the following: (1) premises, operations and mobile equipment liability; (2) completed operations and products liability; (3) contractual liability pursuant to standard ISO policy form CG 00 01 language insuring the obligations assumed by CONSULTANT in this Agreement; (4) broad form property damage liability; and (5) personal injury liability endorsement, including death.

C. Professional Liability Insurance. Professional Liability Insurance protecting against liabilities arising out of or in connection with negligent acts, errors, or omissions of CONSULTANT and all of CONSULTANTS employees, subcontractors, consultants and other agency in connection with this Agreement, at a minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage and $1,000,000 aggregate, on a "claims made basis". Coverage shall be maintained for two years from the date the Services are substantially complete. Such professional liability policies shall include coverage for liability assumed by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement.

D. Workers Compensation Insurance. Workers Compensation insurance, occupational disease insurance and employer?s liability insurance shall be required with minimum limits as required by law, covering all workplaces involved in this Agreement.

E. Policy Terms. Concurrently with execution of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide CITY with Certificates of Insurance evidencing that CONSULTANT has obtained or maintains the insurance required by this Section

5.3. The Certificates shall be on forms acceptable to CITY. CONSULTANT shall also furnish CITY with original endorsements with the following documentation:

Precluding cancellation before the expiration of thirty (30) days after CITY shall have received written notification thereof from CONSULTANT by United States mail;
Providing that CONSULTANT's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, and include a “separation of insureds” or “severability” clause which treats each insured separately, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability (cross-liability endorsement);

10.a
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project Excepting CONSULTANT?S professional liability insurance and Workers Compensation Insurance, naming CITY, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds (“Additional Insureds”); and
Providing that for any claims relating to CONSULTANT's services hereunder, CONSULTANT's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to CITY, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents, and that any insurance or self-insurance maintained by CITY for itself, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents shall be in excess of CONSULTANT's insurance and shall not be contributory with it.

It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverages requirements and/or limits shall be available to the Additional Insured, including but not limited to any umbrella or excess insurance.

Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be the greater of:
(a) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (b) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured.

F. Material Breach. If CONSULTANT fails to maintain insurance coverage or provided insurance documentation which is required pursuant to this Agreement, it shall be deemed a material breach of this Agreement. CITY, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement and obtain damages from CONSULTANT resulting from said breach. Alternatively, CITY may purchase the required insurance coverage, and without further notice to CONSULTANT, may deduct from sums due to CONSULTANT any premium costs advanced by CITY for such insurance. These remedies shall be in addition to any other remedies available to CITY.

ARTICLE 6 - NOTICES
All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing, and shall be personally delivered or sent by facsimile or reputable overnight courier and shall be deemed received upon the earlier of: (1) if personally delivered, the date of delivery to the address of the person to receive such notice; (2) if delivered by Federal Express or other overnight courier for next business day delivery, the next business day; (3) if sent by facsimile, with the original sent on the same day by overnight courier, the date on which the facsimile is received, provided it is before 5:00 P.M. Pacific Time; or (4) if sent electronically, the date of delivery on the confirmed read receipt. Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner described in this Article 6. Rejection or other refusal to accept or the inability to deliver because of a change in address of which no notice was given shall be deemed to constitute receipt of the notice or communication sent. Unless changed in accordance herewith, the addresses for notices given pursuant to this Agreement shall be as follows:

If to CITY: City Manager
170 Santa Maria Avenue
Pacifica, CA 94404

10.a
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project Phone: (650) 738-7409
Facsimile: (650) 359-6038
Email: [email protected]
If to CONSULTANT: Dave Richardson
2175 North California Blvd.

Walnut Creek, Ca 94596
Phone: 925-451-2257
Email: [email protected]
ARTICLE 7 - MISCELLANEOUS

7.1. Conflict of Interest Prohibition. CITY and CONSULTANT will comply with the requirements of the CITY?s Conflict of Interest Code adopted pursuant to California Government Code §87300 et seq., the Political Reform Act (California Government Code §81000 et seq.), the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission (Title 2, §18110 et seq. of the California Code of Regulations), California Government Code §1090 et seq., and any other ethics laws applicable to the performance of the Services and/or this Agreement. CONSULTANT may be required to file with the CITY Clerk a completed Form 700 before commencing performance of the Services unless the CITY Clerk determines that completion of a Form 700 is not required, pursuant to CITY?s Conflict of Interest Code. Form 700 forms are available from the CITY Clerk.

CONSULTANT may not perform Services for any other person or entity that, pursuant to any applicable law or regulation, would result in a conflict of interest or would otherwise be prohibited with respect to CONSULTANT?s obligations pursuant to this Agreement.

CONSULTANT agrees to cooperate fully with CITY and to provide any necessary and appropriate information requested by CITY or any authorized representative concerning potential conflicts of interest or prohibitions concerning CONSULTANT?s obligations pursuant to this Agreement.

CONSULTANT may not employ any CITY official, officer or employee in the performance of the Services, nor may any official, officer or employee of CITY have any financial interest in this Agreement that would violate California Government Code §1090 et seq. CONSULTANT hereby warrants that it is not now, nor has it been in the previous twelve (12) months, an employee, agent, appointee, or official of CITY. If CONSULTANT was an employee, agent, appointee, or official of CITY in the previous twelve months, CONSULTANT warrants that it did not participate in any manner in the forming of this Agreement. CONSULTANT understands that, if this Agreement is made in violation of Government Code §1090 et seq., the entire Agreement is void and CONSULTANT will not be entitled to any compensation for CONSULTANT?s performance of the Services, including reimbursement of expenses, and CONSULTANT will be required to reimburse CITY for any sums paid to CONSULTANT under this Agreement. CONSULTANT understands that, in addition to the foregoing, penalties for violating Government Code §1090 may include criminal prosecution and disqualification from holding public office in the State of California.

10.a
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project Any violation by CONSULTANT of the requirements of this provision will constitute a material breach of this Agreement, and the CITY reserves all its rights and remedies at law and equity concerning any such violations.

7.2. Subcontracting. CONSULTANT may subcontract portions of the Services upon the prior written approval of CITY. CONSULTANT will be solely responsible for payment of such subcontract Services. No contractual relationship will exist between any such subcontractors of CONSULTANT and CITY. CONSULTANT?s subcontractors agree to be bound to CONSULTANT and CITY in the same manner and to the same extent as CONSULTANT is bound to CITY under the Agreement. CONSULTANT?s subcontractors further agree to include the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, with any subsubcontractor to the extent they apply to the scope of the sub-subcontractor?s work. A copy of the CITY indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to CONSULTANT?s subcontractors upon request.

7.3. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of CITY and CONSULTANT as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters covered hereunder. This Agreement may only be modified by an amendment in writing signed by each party.

7.4. No Assignment. The Services are deemed unique and neither party shall assign, transfer, subcontract or otherwise substitute its interest in this Agreement or any of its obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other party. As limited by this Section

7.2, this Agreement is to be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.

7.5. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is determined to be unconstitutional, invalid or beyond the authority of either party, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect, provided that the remainder of this Agreement can be interpreted to give effect to the intentions of the parties.

7.6. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts and, when fully signed, such counterparts shall have the same effect as if signed in one document.

7.7. Choice of Law. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California without reference to its choice of laws principles and venue shall be in the appropriate court in San Mateo County, California.

7.8. Waiver. No failure on the part of either Party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder. A waiver by either CITY or CONSULTANT of any breach of this Agreement shall not be binding upon the waiving party unless such waiver is in writing. In the event of a written waiver, such a waiver shall not affect the waiving party's rights with respect to any other further breach.

10.a
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project

7.9. Mediation. In the event the parties are unable to resolve a dispute arising under this Agreement through good faith negotiations, the parties agree to submit the matter to mediation with a mutually agreeable mediator. Prior to the mediation, the parties shall exchange any documents reasonably necessary to resolve the matter to be mediated.

7.10. Attorney?s Fees. If any action at law or in equity, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, which may be set by the court in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled.

7.11. Interpretation. In the event this Agreement is ever construed in any dispute between the parties, it and each of its provisions shall be construed without regard to the party or parties responsible for its preparation and shall be deemed to have been prepared jointly by the parties. The rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in interpreting this Agreement.

7.12. Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of one of the parties represents that he or she is duly authorized to sign and deliver the Agreement on behalf of such party and that this Agreement is binding on such party in accordance with its terms.

7.13. Third Parties. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with, or cause of action in favor of, a third party against either the CITY or CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT?s Services hereunder are being performed solely for the benefit of CITY. CITY shall be an express third-party beneficiary of all contracts between CONSULTANT and any subcontractors or subconsultants in connection with any services performed in connection with, or in furtherance of, this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth above.

CITY OF PACIFICA
By: Date
Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager

CONSULTANT
By: Date
Dave Richardson, Senior Principal
Attest:

By: ___________________________
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk

10.a
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project Approved As To Form
By:

Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney

10.a
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project

EXHIBIT A

TASK ORDER

10.a
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project TASK ORDER NO. 1

CITY OF PACIFICA
AND
Woodard Curran Inc.

SECTION 1 – PURPOSE
The purpose of this Task Order is to authorize and direct Woodard Curran Inc. to proceed with the work specified in SECTION 2 below, in accordance with the provisions of the Master Agreement for Consultant Services between the City of Pacifica (“CITY”) and Woodard Curran Inc. (“CONSULTANT”) hereto dated January 8, 2024 (“MASTER AGREEMENT”) SECTION 2 – SCOPE OF WORK
The items authorized by this Task Order are presented in Attachment “A” – Scope of Services, which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.

SECTION 3 – COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT
Compensation shall be as provided in the MASTER AGREEMENT. Compensation for services as set forth in SECTION 2 shall be as set forth in Attachment “B” – Compensation, which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. Total compensation for all services provided under this Task Order shall not exceed seventy-nine thousand, nine hundred fifty-nine dollars ($79,959) (“Cost Ceiling”).

SECTION 4 – TIME OF PERFORMANCE
The services described in SECTION 2 of this Task Order shall be completed by December 31, 2024, or as extended in writing by the City Manager.

SECTION 5 – ITEMS AND CONDITIONS
All terms and conditions contained in the MASTER AGREEMENT are incorporated by reference and remain in full force and effect.

Approved this 8th day of January 2024.
[Signatures on Next Page]

10.a
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project

CITY OF PACIFICA
By: Date
Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager
Approved As To Form
By:

Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney

CONSULTANT
Woodard Curran Inc.

By: Date
Dave Richardson, Senior Principal

10.a
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project ATTACHMENT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES

10.a
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project 2175 N California Blvd
Suite 315
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
www.woodardcurran.com
T 800.426.4262
T 925.627.4100
Via Electronic Mail
November 8, 2023
Louis Sun, P.E.

WWTP Plant Manager
City of Pacifica, Public Works Department
Re: Refinement of Sanitary Sewer Influent Flows to Rockaway Pump Station, Pacifica Proposal for Flow Monitoring and Subsequent Hydraulic Model Recalibration Dear Louis,
At the request of the City of Pacifica (City), Woodard & Curran has prepared the following scope of services for a task order to provide hydraulic modeling support related to estimating sanitary sewer influent flows to the Rockaway Pump Station (PS).

The flow monitoring and hydraulic model recalibration work will be informed by the hydraulic modeling work completed by Woodard & Curran for the Master Plan Update (Master Plan Update) as well as follow-up capacity studies. Follow-up studies to assess the capacity of Rockaway PS (Rockaway PS Capacity Assessment) were completed in March 2023 and October 2023.

The work items included in this task order are described below.

Task 1 Flow Monitoring
Woodard ADS Environmental Services or ADS) will conduct temporary monitoring at five (5) flow meter site locations and one (1) rain gauge site location within the Rockaway PS tributary area. Flow meters will be of the area-velocity type. Monitoring data (flow, depth, velocity) will be collected for a period of up to three (3) months; however, if sufficient dry and wet weather flow data are obtained after two (2) months, then the meters and rain gauge will be removed. Data from the temporary monitoring program will be used to refine the modeled flows to Rockaway PS.

Task 2 Hydraulic Model Recalibration and Capacity Evaluation Woodard & Curran will use the flow monitoring data collected under Task 1 to undergo model recalibration for the Rockaway PS tributary area. The City will also provide Woodard & Curran with SCADA flow, pressure, and/or level data recorded during the flow monitoring period at Rockaway PS, Sharp Park PS, Linda Mar PS, and the Calera Creek Water Recycling Plant. Model parameters (e.g., base wastewater flows, flow routing, diurnal patterns, infiltration, and inflow) will be updated to achieve a reasonably good match between the modeled and monitored flows. The recalibrated hydraulic model will be used as the basis for the capacity assessment for the purpose of identifying and evaluating pump station and gravity sewer capacity restrictions.

The 10-year, 24-hour design rainfall event used for the Master Plan Update will be used for this capacity assessment. In addition, Woodard & Curran will also identify a historical storm period (such as the December 2021 sequence of storms) that could result in elevated longer-duration infiltration response to use for this assessment.

10.a
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project City of Pacifica 2 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Flow Monitoring and Model Recalibration for Rockaway PS Tributary Area November 8, 2023 Task 3 Technical Memorandum
Woodard & Curran will prepare a brief draft and final Technical Memorandum (TM) summarizing the work completed under Tasks 1 and 2 to document the results of the model recalibration and capacity evaluation. A draft and final version of the TM, incorporating City review comments, will be submitted to the City as part of this task.

Task 4 Project Management
This task covers overall contract management related to this project. An overall six-month task order period is assumed. Woodard & Curran will monitor project budget and schedule, prepare invoices, and communicate with the City by telephone and e-mail regarding project status and issues.

Task 5 (Optional) Additional Flow Meters
This task includes the potential addition of 5 flow meters in other locations in the City, with subsequent model recalibration. This task includes model recalibration, and discussion with the City of the impact of any changes, but does not include any subsequent capacity assessment.

Deliverables
Draft and final summary TMs
Monthly invoice and task order progress report
Estimated Cost
The estimated level of effort and cost for completing the scope of services described above is $79,959, or $126,639 including the option to add five (5) additional flow meters, as detailed in the attached fee estimate.

Schedule
An overall project duration of six (6) months is anticipated. The flow monitoring program will be conducted between December 2023 and February 2024. The subsequent model recalibration and capacity evaluation will begin following receipt of final flow monitoring data, which is expected within four (4) weeks of meter removal. It is anticipated that the draft TM will be submitted within two (2) months of meter removal in April 2024. Final TM will be submitted mments on the draft TM.

Sincerely,
WOODARD & CURRAN, INC.

Chris van Lienden Gisa Ju
Project Manager Principal-in-Charge

10.a
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project ATTACHMENT “B”

COMPENSATION

10.a
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project Fee Estimate
City of Pacifica November 8, 2023
Flow Monitoring and Model Recalibration for Rockaway PS Tributary Area Tasks Total
Project
Manager
Project
Engineer
PIC/Sr. Tech.

Review
Admin.

Support
Flow
Monitoring
(2)
Chris van
Lienden
Stephanie
Hubli
Gisa Ju ADS
$335 $265 $345 $130
Flow Monitoring and Model Recalibration for Rockaway Pump Station Tributary Area 1 - Flow Monitoring 4 10 2 16 $4,680 $42,076 $46,284 $50,964 2 - Model Recalibration and Capacity Evaluation 12 40 4 56 $16,000 $0 $16,000 3 - Technical Memorandum 8 24 2 1 35 $9,860 $0 $9,860
4 - Project Management 6 1 6 13 $3,135 $0 $3,135
TOTAL 30 74 9 7 120 $33,675 $42,076 $46,284 $79,959
5-Option to Add 5 Flow Monitoring Locations 8 28 4 40 $11,480 $32,000 $35,200 $46,680 TOTAL incl. Optional Services 38 102 13 7 160 $45,155 $74,076 $81,484 $126,639 Labor Outside Services
Total
Admin. Fee
Support

1. Labor costs include salary, overhead and profit. Invoices will be based on Woodard & Curran's standard hourly rates at the time the work is performed.

2. Assumes 5 flow meters and 1 rain gauge for three month monitoring period. Option to remove meters after two months.

3. Subconsultant costs include 10% Woodard & Curran markup.

Total Hours
Sub
Consultant
Total Cost
(3)
Total Labor
Costs (1)

10.a
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project

10.a
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Agreement_Woodard and Curran_20240108_Task Order No 1 Rockaway Pump Station Hydraulic Modeling Project

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/8/2024
1 SUBJECT:

Ratification of Proclamation of Local Emergency related to December 28, 2023, High Tide/Large Wave Events
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt a Resolution ratifying the Proclamation of Local Emergency related to a December 28, 2023 High Tide/Large Wave Events by the City Manager acting as Director of Emergency Services issued on January 5, 2024.

STAFF CONTACT:

Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager
(650) 738-7409
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

On January 5, 2024, the City Manager, acting in his capacity as Director of Emergency Services, proclaimed the existence of a local emergency pursuant to PMC 4-2.05(a) and executed the "Proclamation of the Existence of a Local Emergency" ("Proclamation").

The storm event that occurred on December 28, 2023, resulted in dangerous conditions and public safety concerns and caused damage to Pacifica’s coastline. The events brought large waves combined with high tide that damaged coastal access amenities at Beach Boulevard and Rockaway Beach. Damage included destroying bollards, trash cans, public benches, light posts, and protective railings. Additionally, the Pacifica Pier was damaged, requiring closure for public health and safety until assessment and repair can be completed. The event also created a hole in the seawall at Beach Blvd. and San Jose Ave., requiring 300 square feet of area behind the wall to be temporarily repaired to protect public infrastructure. Additionally, the event created flooding on streets and adjacent properties. Finally, the event brought significant amounts of sand onto the streets and parking lots that will need to be cleared for safe public access.

The Public Works, Fire, and Police Departments, worked diligently through the high tide/large wave event to keep the public safe.

The Council's approval of this item will ratify the Proclamation of Local Emergency related to the December 28, 2023, High Tide/Large Wave Events by the City Manager issued on January 5, 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT:

To be determined. The Proclamation of Local Emergency is a prerequisite for requesting state or federal assistance. The City will seek to recover expenses related to preparation, repair, and recovery from this event.
11 Packet Pg. 168
Pacifica City Council 2
January 08, 2024
ORIGINATED BY:

City Manager's Office
Public Works
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment A: Proclamation of a Local Emergency Related to the December 28, 2023, High Tide/Large Wave Events (PDF)
11 Packet Pg. 169
Pacifica City Council 3
January 08, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. ___-2024

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA RATIFYING THE

PROCLAMATION OF THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY RELATED TO THE DECEMBER 28, 2023 HIGH TIDE / LARGE WAVE EVENTS
WHEREAS, Section 4-2.05 of the City of Pacifica Municipal Code ("PMC") designates the City Manager as the Director of Emergency Services; and WHEREAS, Government Code section 8630 and PMC section 4-2.05(a) empower the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the said City is affected or likely to be affected by an emergency, subject to ratification by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Section 4-2.02 of the PMC defines "emergency" as the "actual or threatened existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within this City caused by such conditions as earthquake, hazardous materials, plane crash, landslide, tsunami, epidemic, flood, riot, fire, or other conditions, including conditions resulting from a labor controversy, which conditions are or are likely to be beyond the capability of control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of this City, requiring the combined forces of other political subdivisions to combat"; and WHEREAS, Section 4-2.01 et seq. of the Pacifica Municipal Code empowers the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the City Council is not in session, subject to confirmation by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property have arisen within the City of Pacifica caused by recent extreme weather events, including flooding and wave damage from the high tide/large wave event occurring on December 28, 2023, at which time the City Council of the City of Pacifica was not in session; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has determined that dangerous conditions affecting Pacifica’s coastline and coastal access amenities, threaten the health and safety of persons and properties, including critical public infrastructure, due to the risk of flooding and damaging high tide / large waves, requiring immediate attention and repair and, as such, constitutes an emergency pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code section 4-2.02 and Public Contract Code section 1102; and
WHEREAS, such conditions are beyond the handling capability of the City's services, personnel, equipment, and facilities, requiring the use of outside contractors to conduct emergency repair pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code section 3-15.09 without giving notice for bids to let the contract, pursuant to Public Contract Code 22050; and WHEREAS, on January 5, 2024, the City Manager, in his capacity as Director of 11 Packet Pg. 170
Pacifica City Council 4
January 08, 2024
Emergency Services, proclaimed the existence of a local emergency in the City of Pacifica after determining that the high tide / large wave conditions are likely to create conditions of disaster or extreme peril which will be beyond the services, personnel and equipment and facilities of the City; and such proclamation is attached hereto as Attachment A; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code section 8630 and PMC section 4-

2.05(a) the City Council must take action to confirm the proclamation within 7 days of the proclamation of local emergency.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said Proclamation of Existence of a Local Emergency, as issued by said City Manager in his capacity as Director of Emergency Services, which is attached hereto as “Attachment A," is hereby ratified and approved by the City of Pacifica City Council;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said local emergency is confirmed to exist and shall be deemed to continue to exist until its termination is proclaimed by the City Council of the City of Pacifica;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that during the existence of this local emergency, the powers, functions, and duties of the Director of Emergency Services and the emergency organization of the City of Pacifica shall be those prescribed by state law, by the existing ordinances and resolutions of the City of Pacifica, as well as this resolution and any subsequent emergency orders of the City Council.
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 8
th day of January, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

11.a
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Attachment A: Proclamation of a Local Emergency Related to the December 28, 2023, High Tide/Large Wave Events (5557 :

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/8/2024
1 SUBJECT:

Introduction of an Ordinance Repealing and Replacing Article 2-“Animal Regulation: Licensing, Vaccinations, Dangerous Animals, and Prohibited Conduct” of Chapter 1, “Animal Control” within Title 6, “Sanitation and Health” to clarify existing definitions, enact additional requirements for animal control and revise animal control service fees”; and finding introduction of Ordinance exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (General Rule Exemption)
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Move to waive the first reading and introduce by title only “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Pacifica Repealing and Replacing Article 2-“Animal Regulation: Licensing, Vaccinations, Dangerous Animals, and Prohibited Conduct” of Chapter 1, “Animal Control” within Title 6, “Sanitation and Health” to clarify existing definitions, enact additional requirements for animal control and revise animal control service fees”; and finding introduction of Ordinance exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (General Rule Exemption)
STAFF CONTACT:

Maria Sarasua, Chief of Police
(650) 738-7314
[email protected]
BACKGROUND:

The City of Pacifica, along with the 19 other cities in San Mateo County contract with the County for the facilitation and coordination of Animal Control Services. Animal Control has been one of the longest running regional/shared services in San Mateo County. The County contracts with Peninsula Humane Society and SPCA (PHS) for animal control field and sheltering service. On May 24, 2021, the City Council approved an Animal Control Agreement between San Mateo County and the various cities within San Mateo County for continued services. The Agreement requires the cities, among other things, to each adopt and maintain animal control ordinance(s) which are substantially the same as the San Mateo County Ordinance in order to continue the County’s ability to administer the animal control services.

The County and PHS began working with a committee of five City Attorneys from five different cities (including Pacifica) in late 2021 to update the current animal control regulations. The committee of stakeholders identified opportunities to clarify existing language, remove repetitive language, and add substantive changes to the existing ordinance, with an emphasis on increasing efficiency in enforcement, clarifying language deemed confusing, and addressing inevitable shortfalls that had emerged after years of experience and enforcement under the current Chapter 6.04 of the County Code.

The intent of the revised Chapter 6.04 is enhanced enforceability, streamlined processes, clarity in definitions based on real-world experience, and above all else, public safety. The County 12 Packet Pg. 174
Pacifica City Council 2
January 08, 2024
worked with various cities over the last year to review and prepare amendments to the County’s Animal Control regulations. As part of the development process, a comprehensive study of other jurisdictions within California was undertaken and, in some circumstances, sought feedback from those jurisdictions on how certain elements worked or did not work. The County carefully considered input from all relevant parties (including the Cities within the County) in order to draft a proposed Ordinance which reflects the interests of all stakeholders.

On December 12, 2023, the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors introduced an ordinance repealing and replacing Chapter 6.04 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code containing regulations regarding animal control in unincorporated San Mateo County. The Board of Supervisors is anticipated to adopt the Ordinance on January 9, 2024.

Staff has prepared a proposed Ordinance for Council’s consideration that is substantially the same as the San Mateo County Ordinance and would replace the existing Article 2, of Chapter 1 under Title 6 of the Pacifica Municipal code, which governs animal licensing, vaccinations, dangerous and vicious animal designation and prohibited conduct. (See Attachment).

DISCUSSION:

The following are the key provisions of the proposed Ordinance:
• Updates existing definitions to improve enforcement capabilities and remove potential areas of confusion, particularly as relates to “Dangerous” and “Vicious” animal designations within the County.
• Lowers the rabies vaccination age requirement as consistent with current state law. • Updates language and enforcement regarding “Vicious” animals. An animal designated as “Vicious” is, in many circumstances, to be humanely euthanized. The proposed code raises the threshold for when an animal may be declared “Vicious” (and thus is to be euthanized) as is consistent with current standards and practical enforcement. For offending animals deemed a significant danger to the public, a “Vicious” animal designation is still applicable.
• Updates language and enforcement regarding “Dangerous” animals. An animal designated as “Dangerous” is one which has exhibited behavior which indicates that heightened safety requirements for the keeping of such animal are required to ensure public protection. The proposed revised Article 2 revises and clarifies the threshold for when an animal may be designated as “Dangerous.” Currently, a Dangerous animal designation remains for the life of the animal; under the proposed revisions, an owner may apply for the designation to be lifted after a period of three (3) years if it has been safely maintained under the permit, removing the need for County oversight and enforcement. The Program Manager has found that most animals deemed “Dangerous” (about 90%) do not re-offend, and that the lifting of designations for animals deemed no longer a danger to the public is consistent with other jurisdictions, as well as state recommendations under the California Food and Agriculture Code. • Removes language indicating that an animal owner may not maintain a “Dangerous” animal in a home with a juvenile person under the age of eighteen (18). The committee could not find any other jurisdiction that had this restriction in an ordinance and is not aware of any instance in which it had actually improved public safety or in which it was enforceable. The proposed Ordinance also reduces the insurance requirements from $1 million to $300,000, which is a level which can be more easily obtained by permittees. 12 Packet Pg. 175
Pacifica City Council 3
January 08, 2024
• Revises and updates the fee schedule and further clarifies the offenses for which administrative citations may be issued for violations of the Chapter.

The proposed Ordinance would make a number of changes to the existing provisions of the City’s animal control regulations in Article 2 including, for example, a requirement that cat owners obtain a license for domesticated cats. The City currently does not require licenses for cats. The County has had cat licensing for many years because it helps to ensure that cats are vaccinated for rabies as vaccination is required for licensing and it helps share the revenue collected for permit fees between both dog and cat owners, rather than just dog owners.

The County expects that all cities in San Mateo County will adopt the proposed Ordinance in form that is substantially similar to the County’s in January/February so that the County can be able to begin enforcing the new provisions by March/April, 2024.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Ordinance is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. and the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal.

Code Regs. §§ 15000 et. seq.), including without limitation, Public Resources Code section 21065 and California Code of Regulations 15378 as this is not a “project” that may cause a direct, or reasonably foreseeable indirect, physical change in the environment and if a “project,” is exempt under the “common sense” exception (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3)) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that this action may have a significant effect on the environment.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

The Council may choose to not adopt the proposed Ordinance but then the City would not be in compliance with the Animal Control Agreement with the County.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

The adoption of the proposed Ordinance aligns with the following established goal of the City Council:
• “Maintaining a Safe Community” includes supporting our first responders (police, fire public works), responding to emergencies, protecting people, property, and businesses, and engaging in emergency preparedness community outreach, public education and prevention activities.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact to the City in adopting the proposed Ordinance. However, the proposed Ordinance includes updated License Fees, which will be established upon adoption of the Ordinance. The fee increase will not cover the entire costs of service but will help offset some of the costs of implementing the program. The City of Pacifica will pay approximately $260,000 to $280,000 to the County for Animal Control Services in FY 2023-34. The County has prepared a fee analysis for each City to support the increased fees. (See Attachment A).

While these new fees are in the Ordinance, City staff plans to also include the fees in the update to the City’s Master Fee Schedule which will be brought to Council in June/July to maximize transparency.
12 Packet Pg. 176
Pacifica City Council 4
January 08, 2024
ORIGINATED BY:

City Manager's Office
Police
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment A: Estimated Fee Increase Analysis by City (PDF) 12 Packet Pg. 177
Pacifica City Council 5
January 08, 2024
ORDINANCE NO. (ID # 5555)
ORDINANCE NO. ________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA REPEALING AND REPLACING ARTICLE 2- “ANIMAL REGULATION: LICENSING, VACCINATIONS, DANGEROUS ANIMALS, AND PROHIBITED CONDUCT” OF CHAPTER 1, “ANIMAL CONTROL” WITHIN TITLE 6 “SANITATION AND HEALTH” TO CLARIFY EXISTING

DEFINITIONS, ENACT ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ANIMAL CONTROL, REVISE

ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICE FEES
The City Council of the City of Pacifica does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. Article 2-“Animal Regulation: Licensing, Vaccinations, Dangerous Animals, and Prohibited Conduct” of Chapter 1, “Animal Control” within Title 6, “Sanitation and Health” is hereby repealed and replaced in its entirety to read as follows:
“ ARTICLE 2- Animal Regulation: Licensing, Vaccinations, Dangerous Animals, and Prohibited Conduct
6-1.201 – Definitions
The following words and phrases, when used in this Article shall have the meaning set forth below:
"Animal Control Officer" – any Person designated as the Animal Control Program Manager for the County, as well as the head of the County’s animal control contractor and their duly authorized officers or deputies. In the event the County has no animal control contractor to provide animal control officers, or in cases of emergency in which additional animal control officers are needed, “animal control officer(s)” may include Persons so designated by the Animal Control Manager. "Animal Control Program" – that program established by the County and participating cities, and the Program’s animal control contractor(s), if any, which contractor is specifically charged with regulating and enforcing laws dealing with animal control within the participating jurisdictions. Animal Control Program includes the Licensing Program.
"Animal Control Program Manager" - that Person employed by the County to oversee the Animal Control Program or designee.
"Animal Control Shelter" - A San Mateo County facility operated by the County, 12 Packet Pg. 178
Pacifica City Council 6
January 08, 2024
or by another public entity, an accredited, tax-exempt humane non-profit organization contracted with the County, or a for-profit business contracted with the County for the purpose of impounding, sheltering, adopting, or euthanizing seized, stray, distressed, homeless, abandoned, or unwanted animals.
“Caretaker” - any Person 18 years of age, or older, who has assumed responsibility for the care, custody, or control of an animal(s). "Dangerous Animal" - any animal, except a trained animal assisting a peace officer engaged in law enforcement duties, that constitutes a danger to Persons or animals, and/or demonstrates any of the following behavior(s):
(a) behavior that results in bodily harm that is less serious than a “Severe Injury”, or constitutes a substantial threat of bodily harm to a Person; or (b) an attack on another animal which results in an injury that is sufficient to require veterinary care even if not received.

An animal which has been declared by an out of this County jurisdiction as "potentially dangerous," "dangerous," "vicious," or any other similar designation, may be deemed a Dangerous or Vicious animal for the purposes of this Article, as determined by an Animal Control Officer.
“Health Officer” - that Person so designated by the County of San Mateo. “Humane Officer” - any Person who is qualified and appointed pursuant to California Corporations Code Section 14502, and who is an employee of the County and designated as such by the County or an employee of a society for prevention of cruelty to animals or humane society that has contracted with the County of San Mateo to provide animal control services.
"Licensing Program” - that program within San Mateo County Health Department, including but not limited to, any County contractor specifically charged with regulating and selling animal licenses in the County of San Mateo. “Owner" - any Person 18 years of age or older who:
(a) holds the license to the animal; or
(b) if the animal is not licensed, is legally entitled to possession of the animal; or
(c) has exercised primary responsibility for the care of the animal for thirty (30) or more consecutive calendar days.
“Person” – means any individual, partnership, corporation, organization, trade or 12 Packet Pg. 179
Pacifica City Council 7
January 08, 2024
professional association, firm, limited liability company, joint venture, association, trust, estate, or any other legal entity, and any officer, member, shareholder, director, employee, agent, or representative thereof.
“Severe injury" - Any physical injury to a human caused by an animal attack that involves tooth derived muscle tears, disfiguring wounds or laceration(s), multiple bites requiring sutures, broken bones and/or requires corrective surgery. “Service Animal” - any animal defined as such by federal or state law. "Vicious Animal" - any animal, except a trained animal assisting a peace officer engaged in law enforcement duties, which meets any or all of the following criteria:
(a) Any animal that, at the time of the attack, is already designated as a Dangerous Animal and/or is the subject of a Dangerous Animal permit, and which is found to have engaged in any of the following:
(1) behavior that results in bodily harm, or constitutes a substantial threat of bodily harm, to a Person; or
(2) an attack on another animal which results in an injury that is sufficient to require veterinary care, whether or not received. (b) Any animal that inflicts Severe Injury to or kills a Person. (c) Any animal which cannot be safely maintained with a Dangerous Animal permit.
(d) Any animal designated by another governmental jurisdiction as, “dangerous”, "vicious", or any other similar designation, if that prior designation is based on behavior which would meet the definition of Vicious Animal under this Article, as determined by an Animal Control Officer.
6-1.202 - Animal Control Program.
(a) The Animal Control Program is responsible for the enforcement of this Article.

The duties of the Animal Control Program shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
(1) Provide animal control, sheltering services, and a rabies control program to carry out and enforce all provisions of this Article and California Health & Safety Code section 121690, and keep such records as may be required by law or contract.
12 Packet Pg. 180
Pacifica City Council 8
January 08, 2024
(2) Enforce the provisions of this Article and all applicable state and local laws relating to the care, treatment, and impounding of animals, and specifically to issue citations and to make arrests for violations of the provisions of this Article and related state laws, to the extent authorized by law.
(3) Impound animals found to be in violation of this Article in the interest of protecting public health and safety.
(4) Investigate animals pursuant to this Article or applicable state law and, if deemed appropriate, designate any such animals as Dangerous or Vicious pursuant to this Article.
(5) Impound animals which are in imminent or ongoing danger, or which are in need of safekeeping in order to protect the health and safety of the animal.
(6) Impound animals that are causing a threat to public safety. (7) Where authorized under the law, to enter upon any premises upon which any animal is kept in order to seize or impound of any animal if reasonable cause exists to believe that such animal is being kept or has behaved in violation of the provisions of this Article. (8) To remove and dispose of the carcass of any animal(s) found on any public right of way, except freeways or other areas maintained by Caltrans.
(9) Quarantine animals under the direction of the County Health Officer to ensure public health and safety.
(10) Euthanize and/or dispose of animal(s) humanely and in accordance with the law.
(11) Place for adoption, when appropriate, properly impounded animals if such animals are not redeemed after due notice to known Owners in accordance with the law.
(12) Provide and hold vaccination clinics in strategic locations throughout the County pursuant to Health and Safety Code 121690. (13) Provide or make available at low cost, spay/neuter surgeries to dogs, cats, and rabbits.
(14) Provide for issuance of an animal license for a period not to exceed 12 Packet Pg. 181
Pacifica City Council 9
January 08, 2024
the term of the anti-rabies vaccination, as provided by state law. (15) To collect any fees or charges provided for in this Article for the licensing, impounding and/or keeping of any animal, or for the enforcement of this Article.
(b) Animal Control Officers qualified under Penal Code section 830.9, who are either employees of the County designated as such by the County, or employee(s) of and designated as such by a society for prevention of cruelty to animals or humane society which has contracted with the County to provide animal control services, shall have the authority to issue citations and/or notices to appear in court, and obtain and execute search warrants to the maximum extent allowed by law, for violations of state and local animal control laws. Animal Control Officers shall have the authority provided by state law including, but not limited to, that described by Penal Code section 830.9. Animal Control Officers must complete Penal Code section 832 training.
(c) Those employees of a society for prevention of cruelty to animals or humane society under contract with the County to provide animal control services, who have been appointed and qualify as humane officers under California Corporations Code section 14502, or its successor statute, shall have the authority to issue citations and/or notices to appear in court, and obtain and execute search warrants, to the maximum extent allowed by law, for violations of state and local animal control laws. (d) The County may contract for animal control services to be performed countywide, including within cities, provided agreement is made with the participating jurisdictions.
6-1.203 - Rabies Vaccinations.
(a) Every dog or cat Owner shall ensure their animal is vaccinated for rabies by a licensed veterinarian in the manner prescribed or approved by state law and the State of California Department of Public Health, after the dog or cat attains the age of three (3) months of age and/or within ten (10) calendar days of acquiring an unvaccinated animal. This vaccination shall be obtained prior to issuing a license for the dog or cat. In addition, proof of vaccination shall be provided by the Owner or veterinarian to the Licensing Program or the County’s animal control contractor. (b) Every veterinarian who vaccinates or causes or directs to be vaccinated in the County any dog, or cat with rabies vaccine shall certify that such animal has been vaccinated. Every veterinarian shall submit to the licensing authority a copy of the County-approved rabies vaccination form, within ten (10) calendar days of the beginning of each month, for any dog 12 Packet Pg. 182
Pacifica City Council 10 January 08, 2024
or cat which they vaccinate or direct to be vaccinated with anti-rabies during the previous month. An Animal Control Officer or animal licensing staff shall have the right to inspect records of rabies vaccinations during normal business hours.
(c) Upon receipt of a written request from a licensed veterinarian to exempt a microchipped pet from receiving a one or three-year vaccination, for medical reasons, the County Health Officer and/or designee shall review the basis for the request for exemption and approve or/deny said request. 6-1.204 - Dog and Cat Licenses.
(a) Licensing requirements for dogs and cats shall be as follows:
(1) An annual license shall be obtained, and an annual license fee shall be paid by the Owner for every dog or cat over the age of three (3) months owned or kept in unincorporated San Mateo County, and all cities within the County which adopt this Article. Said annual license fee shall be first due when the animal reaches three (3) months of age or within sixty (60) calendar days after the dog or cat is acquired, and due on the expiration date of the rabies vaccination and each year thereafter.
(2) New residents shall have sixty (60) calendar days in which to acquire such license.
(3) Persons renewing their license shall have thirty (30) calendar days following their due date before being found delinquent and assessed a late penalty.
(4) The fee for such license shall be as set forth in section 6-1.230 of this Article. The fee paid for the licensing of altered dogs and cats shall be less than said license fee for unaltered cats or dogs upon presentation of the proper certification. The license fee paid by Persons over the age of 60 shall be at a discount.
(5) An Owner may obtain a three-year license for a cat or dog by submitting to the Licensing Program adequate proof of a three-year rabies vaccination of the animal to be licensed and payment of the applicable fees, as set forth in section 6-1.230 of this code. (6) Any Person who fails to pay such license fee after said fee is due or said dog or cat is required to be licensed, in addition to paying any past due license fee(s), may also be required to pay a late fee in accordance with Section 6-1.230 of this Article or may receive an administrative citation.
12 Packet Pg. 183
Pacifica City Council 11 January 08, 2024
(7) A license shall be obtained, but no license fee shall be payable, by the Owner of any dog being raised, trained or used as a Service Animal, or for dogs that have served as a member of the armed forces of the United States of America, or any dog used by a local law enforcement agency for the purposes of law enforcement. (8) Animals with microchip implants or other permanent identification acceptable to the Animal Control Program are not exempt from the mandatory licensing requirements.
(b) The licensing provisions in this Article are not applicable to the following:
(1) Dogs or cats used for diagnostic purposes or research, the use having been approved by the California State Department of Health Services pursuant to section 1666 of the Health and Safety Code. (2) Dogs or cats used for teaching purposes in recognized educational institutions.
(3) Dogs or cats owned by veterinarians licensed by the State and kept on the premises used by said veterinarians in their practice. (c) Tags for dogs and cats shall be issued as follows:
(1) The Licensing Program shall procure and, when licensing fee is paid, issue a lifetime tag which shall bear the number of the license. A record shall be kept with the name of the Owner together with a description of the dog or cat for which the license is issued and the number of the license, and a tag shall be provided to such Person upon payment for such license as provided by this Article. (2) Whenever a tag has been lost or stolen, the Owner of the animal may request a duplicate tag upon payment of the required fee. (3) The Owner of a licensed dog or cat shall affix such tag to a suitable collar, which collar shall remain on the dog or cat at all times. (4) When an animal has been designated as a Service Animal, the Owner may obtain a lifetime service tag and shall be required to follow the requirements in Section 6-1.203 (a). Said tag will replace a regular dog license.
(5) The Owner or operator of any kennel, animal breeding facility, pet shop, or any place or establishment where animals are sold, adopted, or given away shall keep a permanent record of the name, address, 12 Packet Pg. 184
Pacifica City Council 12 January 08, 2024
and phone number of the purchaser of any dog or cat, along with the breed, color, sex, and age of each animal sold, adopted, or given away and shall forward such information to Animal Control services within thirty (30) calendar days thereafter. An Animal Control Officer, County representative, or employee of the County’s animal control contractor shall have the right to inspect such records during normal business hours, with forty-eight (48) hours prior notice to the Owner or operator.
6-1.205 - Public Protection from Dogs.
(a) No Owner or possessor of a dog shall cause or allow such dog to bite, or physically threaten or harass any person unless necessary to protect the physical safety of a Person.
(b) Every Owner or possessor of a dog shall prevent such dog from causing injury to another animal while such animal is lawfully upon public or private property. The failure of the Owner of a victim animal to have the animal on a leash shall not, in itself, constitute a mitigating factor in any attack. (c) No Owner or possessor of a dog shall command or provoke such dog to attack, sic or threaten a Person unless such action is necessary to protect the physical safety of a Person.
(d) No Owner or possessor of a dog that resides in another county and is found to have violated this section shall thereafter allow such dog to be brought into San Mateo County unless the dog is fully enclosed in a vehicle and passing through to another location without stopping at any public or private premises within the County.
6-1.206 - Prohibited Conduct.

No Owner or other Person having care, custody or control of any animal shall cause or permit it to do any of following:

(a) To be upon any public street, sidewalk, park, school ground, any public property, or upon any unenclosed premises in this jurisdiction unless:
1) the animal is properly licensed, if such licensing is necessary hereunder; and
2) the animal is controlled by a chain, lead rope, or leash, which is connected to the animal’s collar, saddle, harness, or halter. This latter requirement is not applicable to cats, or to service animals under the complete control of the Owner or Caretaker.
12 Packet Pg. 185
Pacifica City Council 13 January 08, 2024
An electric or invisible fence does not constitute an enclosure for the purposes of this requirement.
(b) To trespass upon any private property without the consent of the owner thereof, and to knowingly permit the animal to remain upon the property, or to habitually continue to trespass thereon.
(c) To suffer or permit such animal to habitually bark or meow or otherwise act to disturb the peace of any citizen or to be a public nuisance. (d) To be without proper and adequate food, water, shelter, care, and attention.
(e) No Person shall possess within San Mateo County any animal designated by another jurisdiction as “potentially dangerous”, “dangerous”, or “vicious,” or other designation based on the animal’s potential danger to humans and/or animals, without previously notifying Animal Control and receiving express written permission from the Animal Control Manager for the animal’s presence or residence in San Mateo County. A failure to receive prior permission is in itself a sufficient basis for an Animal Control Officer or peace officer to seize and impound such animal. (f) Subsection (a)(2) of this section shall not be applicable to cats. (g) Notwithstanding the requirements of subdivision (a)(2), dogs shall be allowed to be without a saddle, harness, halter or leash in the following locations: (1) on the beach between Paloma Avenue and the northern boundary of the City of Pacific, and (2) within the fenced boundaries of the City dog park located at 1220 Linda Mar Boulevard. The Director of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department may promulgate rules and regulations in writing for the use of the dog park and it shall be unlawful for any person to violate such rules and regulations. The off-leash activity allowed by this section shall only apply under all of the following circumstances: (1) such off-leash activity occurs during a time of the day that said beach or dog park is open to the public, (2) the dog to be offleash is under the immediate voice control of some competent person capable of controlling such animal, and (3) the rules and regulations promulgated by the Director are complied with in full. For the purposes of this subsection, the term "beach" shall mean that land lying between the line of ordinary tide in the Pacific Ocean, extending inward, to whichever comes first: a legal fence, a distinctive berm or cliff, or an officially-erected sign specifically designating the boundaries of the beach. 6-1.207 - Protection of Animals in Motor Vehicles.
(a) No Person shall leave or confine an animal in any unattended motor 12 Packet Pg. 186
Pacifica City Council 14 January 08, 2024
vehicle under conditions that endanger the health or well-being of said animal due to heat, cold, lack of adequate ventilation, lack of water, or other circumstances that could reasonably be expected to cause suffering, disability, or death of said animal.
(b) An Animal Control Officer, Humane Officer or peace officer may remove an animal from a motor vehicle if the animal’s safety reasonably appears to be in immediate danger from heat, cold, lack of adequate ventilation, lack of water, or other circumstances that could reasonably be expected to cause suffering, disability, or death to the animal. An Animal Control Officer, Humane Officer or peace officer is authorized to take all steps that are necessary for the removal of such animal from the motor vehicle, including, but not limited to, breaking into the motor vehicle, after a reasonable effort has been made to locate the Owner or other Person responsible.
(c) If an animal is removed from a motor vehicle as set forth herein, the removing officer shall, if deemed necessary by the officer, take it to an animal shelter, veterinary hospital, or other place of safekeeping. (d) An Animal Control Officer or peace officer who removes an animal from a motor vehicle shall, in a conspicuous location on or within the motor vehicle, leave written notice bearing their name and office, and the address of the location where the animal can be claimed. The animal may be released to the Owner only after payment of all fees that have accrued for the maintenance, care, medical treatment, or impoundment of the animal.
(e) Nothing in this section shall preclude prosecution under both this section and California Penal Code Section 597 or any other provision of state or local law.
6-1.208 - Release from Confinement.

No Person other than the Owner, or person authorized by the Owner of the animal shall release any animal from any confinement, vehicle, or restraint unless such release is necessary for the immediate health and safety of the animal. This section shall not apply to Animal Control Officers, Humane Officers, and/or peace officers. 6-1.209 - Declaration of Dangerous Animal.
(a) No Person shall knowingly keep, have, maintain, sell, trade, or let for hire an animal designated as Dangerous under this Article without obtaining a Dangerous Animal permit from the Animal Control Officer. The animal Owner shall comply with all conditions of the Dangerous Animal permit including, but not limited to, all requirements of section 6-1.210 of this 12 Packet Pg. 187
Pacifica City Council 15 January 08, 2024
Article. Any animal which is determined to be Dangerous under this Article and for which a permit has not been obtained shall be surrendered to an Animal Control Officer, peace officer, or a County animal control contractor agency for appropriate disposition, which may include humane euthanasia.
(b) In determining whether or not an animal shall be designated as Dangerous, the Animal Control Officer, peace officer, or hearing officer may consider any relevant facts and circumstances, including but not limited to:
(1) the alleged attacking animal’s prior history.
(2) the alleged attacking animal’s Owner(s) ability to comply with this Article, and/or compliance with any prior Dangerous Animal permits held by the alleged attacking animal’s Owner(s).
(3) whether any of the animals involved were previously deemed by a governmental jurisdiction as “potentially dangerous, “dangerous”, “vicious” or any other similar designation.
(c) In determining whether or not an animal shall be designated as Dangerous, the Animal Control Officer, peace officer, or hearing officer, may consider the following mitigating factors:
(1) Whether at the time of the injury, attack or molestation, the Person or animal suffering the injury, attack or molestation:
(i) provoked, tormented, teased, abused or assaulted the animal, thereby causing or contributing to the alleged
behavior;
(ii) committed a willful trespass or other tort upon the private property of the Owner or Caretaker of the animal in the presence of the animal;
(iii) threatened or committed an unjustified attack or assault against the Owner, Caretaker or other Person in control of the animal in the presence of the animal
(2) Any other mitigating factor relevant to whether the animal poses a threat to public health or safety. The failure of the Owner or Person in control of a victim animal to have the victim animal on a leash shall not, in itself, constitute a mitigating factor in any attack. (d) The unwillingness of a victim or a particular witness to testify at a hearing 12 Packet Pg. 188
Pacifica City Council 16 January 08, 2024
shall not prevent designation of an animal as a Dangerous Animal, as long as sufficient evidence exists to support the designation. (e) In the event that an Animal Control Officer or peace officer determines it necessary to protect the health or safety of the public, or of any animal, they may immediately impound any animal according to the procedures set forth in this Article.
(f) If an Animal Control Officer or peace officer has investigated and determined that an animal is Dangerous, the Animal Control Officer or peace officer shall deliver written notice of such determination to the Owner of the animal pursuant to section 6-1.226.
(g) Should the Owner of the animal wish to contest the Dangerous Animal designation, the Owner may request a hearing, which hearing shall be conducted according to the procedures set forth in section 6-1.215 of this Article. The Owner shall submit a written request for a Dangerous Animal hearing to the Animal Control Officer within seven (7) calendar days of the written notification by the Animal Control Officer and/or peace officer that the animal has been declared dangerous.
(1) Should the animal Owner not submit a request for an administrative hearing within the required timeframe, the administrative hearing process shall be deemed waived, the Dangerous Animal
designation will be final, and the animal Owner shall obtain a Dangerous Animal permit within seven (7) calendar days of the written notification that the animal has been declared Dangerous. (2) If the animal Owner requested a hearing and the hearing officer confirms the determination that the animal is Dangerous, the Owner must obtain the Dangerous Animal permit and meet the conditions required by such permit, within seven (7) calendar days of notice of such decision, unless the time is extended by an Animal Control Officer.

(3) If an animal is designated as Dangerous, but the Owner fails to obtain a Dangerous Animal permit within the required timeframe, the animal will be deemed abandoned, and will be subject to disposition as deemed appropriate, including potential euthanasia by the County’s animal control contractor, at the discretion of the Animal Control Officer, peace officer or City or County representative. If not already impounded, the animal will be promptly impounded. The Owner of the animal shall be responsible for all costs of impoundment of the animal incurred prior to such abandonment.
12 Packet Pg. 189
Pacifica City Council 17 January 08, 2024
(h) If after investigation by an Animal Control Officer or peace officer, that officer determines that the animal is not Dangerous, the victim or an Owner of a victim animal may appeal that determination, within seven (7) calendar days of notice of the decision given pursuant to section 6-1.226, by submitting to the Animal Control Officer or peace officer a written request for a hearing and paying the required fee. The Animal Control Officer or peace officer shall prepare a written report documenting its reasons for determining the animal not Dangerous and shall include evidence it has considered for and against the designation in its report.

The hearing shall be conducted according to the procedures set forth in section 6-1.215 of this Article.
(i) No animal designated by the County as a Dangerous Animal may be transferred to a new place of residence or to a new Owner or Caretaker without prior written approval of the Animal Control Program Manager.

Prior to the relocation, a written request for the relocation must be delivered to the Animal Control Program Manager and the County’s animal control contractor, if any, at least 30 calendar days prior to the relocation. (j) If an Animal Control Officer declares an animal as Dangerous which has already been declared Potentially Dangerous or Dangerous by another jurisdiction located outside of the County of San Mateo, the Owner of such animal must obtain and comply with a Dangerous Animal permit at least seven (7) calendar days prior to moving the animal into the County. The animal shall not reside in the County of San Mateo until the Dangerous Animal permit has been issued by the Animal Control Program and the Owner meets the conditions of said permit.
(k) A permit issued under this section is subject to renewal annually. An annual inspection of the location where the animal resides will be performed by an Animal Control Officer. Inspections may occur at any reasonable hour and will occur at least annually. The fee for such permit and inspection shall be as set forth in section 6-1.230 of this Article. Fees shall not be refundable. If the registered Owner fails to pay the permit fee and/or comply with the requirements of the permit within ten (10) calendar days of the annual inspection date, the permit may be revoked and the animal may be impounded for appropriate disposition, as determined by an Animal Control Officer, peace officer, County contracted agency or City designee, including humane euthanasia.
(l) A Dangerous Animal designation is a designation that remains with that animal for its lifetime, unless terminated as provided by this subsection. A Dangerous Animal designation may be terminated if all of the following criteria have been met, as determined by an Animal Control Officer or peace officer and the Animal Control Program Manager and/or City designee:
12 Packet Pg. 190
Pacifica City Council 18 January 08, 2024
(1) The Owner has complied with all Dangerous Animal Permit requirements for a period of three (3) years and the animal has not been found to have committed any violations of the requirements of the permit, or of this Article, or any other applicable animal control laws, for the duration of that period.
(2) The animal has remained current on all rabies or similar required vaccinations and has remained current on its licensing and paid all fees for the duration of the three (3) year period.

If an animal Owner disputes a finding that the Dangerous Animal designation will not be terminated, the animal Owner may request an administrative hearing to be held according to the procedures set forth in section 6-1.215 of this Article.
6-1.210 - Dangerous Animal Permit Requirements.
(a) Any Owner of a Dangerous Animal shall ensure compliance with the following rules and regulations which shall be mandatory requirements for any Dangerous Animal permit:
(1) When the animal is off the property of its Owner, ensure that the animal is not kept upon any unenclosed premise unless said animal is leashed and muzzled with a cage or basket muzzle, or any other muzzle approved by the Animal Control Officer. The leash shall not exceed four (4) feet in length and having a minimum tensile strength of 300 pounds and shall be under the direct control and supervision of the Owner or a Person of such age, size, and strength as can easily control such animal. Extraordinary care shall be taken by the Owner and/or Caretaker to ensure that such restraint is sufficient to control the animal in a manner which it will not endanger other Persons or animals.
(2) Ensure said animal is never kept on any unenclosed premises even if tethered, tied or staked.
(3) Ensure said animal is kept in a fenced yard, kennel, dog run or other enclosure, sufficient to prevent the escape of the animal or entry of young children, as approved by the Animal Control Officer or peace officer. An electric or invisible fence is not an acceptable means of enclosure for the purpose of this requirement. (4) Maintain the animal so that it is not a threat to any mail carrier, sanitation worker, meter Person, or other Person who has the lawful right to enter the property.
12 Packet Pg. 191
Pacifica City Council 19 January 08, 2024
(5) Ensure that all structures used to confine the animals are locked with a key or combination lock when such animals are within the fenced yard, kennel, run or enclosure.
(6) Regularly inspect the fenced yard, kennel, dog run or enclosure to ensure that it is secure to maintain the animal and keep young children out.
(7) Allow inspections by any Animal Control Officer or peace officer at any reasonable hour of the premises or premises upon which the animal is maintained.
(8) Pay permit and property inspection fees as set forth in section 6-

1.230 of this Article within (10) ten calendar days of the permit issuance or renewal.
(9) Obtain and post approved sign(s) from the Animal Control Program after payment of a non-refundable fee as set forth in Section 6-

1.230 of this Article. Sign(s) shall be conspicuously posted in a manner visible to the public at all entrances to the property where the animal is kept, warning Persons of the presence of a Dangerous Animal as directed by the Animal Control Officer or peace officer. Such sign(s) must be surrendered in the event of the revocation of the permit, death of animal, or approved relocation of the animal.
(10) Advise all members who reside in the same household and on the same premises of the conditions established by the permit for keeping or maintaining said Dangerous Animal.
(11) Ensure said animal wears, at all times, a separate Dangerous Animal tag issued by the Animal Control Program in addition to complying with license requirements as defined in Section 6-1.204 of this Article.
(12) Ensure said animal be microchipped and inform the Animal Control Officer with the microchip number within thirty (30) calendar days from the date the Dangerous Animal permit was issued.
(13) Within forty-five (45) calendar days from the date the Dangerous Animal Permit was issued, unless this period is extended by the Animal Control Program Manager or city representative at their sole discretion, said animal shall be spayed or neutered by a California licensed veterinarian, at Owner expense, and within those forty-five (45) days, the Owner shall also present written proof to the Animal 12 Packet Pg. 192
Pacifica City Council 20 January 08, 2024
Control Officer that the surgery was performed. In the event an animal cannot be safely altered, due to a medical reason, the Owner shall present the Animal Control Program Manager and Animal Control Officer with a written request from a California licensed Veterinarian stating the medical reason(s) that the animal should not be altered. The County Health Officer or designee will approve or deny the request. If said request is denied, the animal shall be altered by a California licensed veterinarian within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of notification that the request was not approved, and within those fifteen (15) calendars days provide such written proof to the Animal Control Officer that the surgery was performed.
(14) Notify an Animal Control Officer and the Animal Control Program Manager of the animal's death within twenty-four (24) hours and produce the animal's body for verification upon request. (15) Notify an Animal Control Officer and the Animal Control Program Manager immediately in the event the animal becomes lost, stolen, or escapes from its fenced yard, kennel run, or enclosure. (16) Pay all reoccurring of additional fees within ten (10) calendar days of service of the invoice or annual permit. Non-payment of fee may result in the permit being revoked unless a payment plan has been approved by the County or City.
(17) Comply with all other permit conditions or requirements imposed by an Animal Control Officer, peace officer, or hearing officer pursuant to this Article.
(18) Comply with all local and state laws regarding the care, use, control, and maintenance of animals.
(b) Any Owner of a Dangerous Animal shall ensure compliance with the following additional requirements, if directed to do so by an Animal Control Officer, peace officer and/or hearing officer:

(1) Prove financial responsibility by posting a bond or certificate of insurance for an amount of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) per animal within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the Dangerous designation. Bond or certificate of insurance will be provided to the Animal Control Program Manager annually prior to expiration of said bond or certificate.
(2) Provide private behavioral and obedience training to the animal, at the Owner’s expense and within the time set forth by the hearing 12 Packet Pg. 193
Pacifica City Council 21 January 08, 2024
officer or an Animal Control Officer following the issuance of a Dangerous Animal permit. Proof of participation, a report of behavioral assessment, and/or a certificate of satisfactory completion from an animal behaviorist or organization approved by an Animal Control Officer shall be provided to the Animal Control Officer and Animal Control Program Manager within seven (7) calendar days following the completion of the mandatory training, but not more than ninety (90) calendar days from the date of the Dangerous designation.
(3) Comply with any other permit requirements determined to be reasonably necessary to protect the public’s health or safety and/or the health or safety of other animals.
(c) No more than two Dangerous Animals may be kept by any Person(s) at any one household, residence, business, or other location, without prior written approval of the designee of the appropriate jurisdiction. 6-1.211 - Revocation or Modification of Dangerous Animal Permit. (a) Any Dangerous Animal permit issued pursuant to this Article may be revoked or modified by the inclusion of additional requirements or otherwise, if the Animal Control Officer or peace officer has reasonable cause to believe any of the following to be true:
(1) The dangerous animal Owner or any Person to whom the Owner has given care, custody, or control of the animal has violated any local or state laws relating to the keeping, care or use of any animals.
(2) The Owner or any Person to whom the Owner has given care, custody, or control of the animal has violated any Dangerous Animal permit conditions, or any requirement imposed by the Animal Control Officer, peace officer, or hearing officer. (3) The Owner or any Person to whom the Owner has given care, custody, or control changed the location of his/her residence or his/her place of business or sells, assigns, transfers, donates, leases, or otherwise disposes of the animal for which the permit was issued without first notifying an Animal Control Officer as outlined in Section 6-1.209.
(4) The Owner or any Person to whom the Owner has given care, custody or control of the animal has changed the residence or premises where the animal is maintained without first complying with the guidelines set forth in Section 6-1.209.
12 Packet Pg. 194
Pacifica City Council 22 January 08, 2024
(5) The Owner or any Person to whom the Owner has given care, custody, or control of the animal is unable or unwilling to comply with the conditions of the Dangerous Animal permit.
(b) In the event that it is reasonably necessary to protect the public or an animal’s health and safety, the Animal Control Officer or peace officer may impound or cause to be impounded the animal while an investigation is taking place.
(c) If, after investigation, the Animal Control Officer or peace officer concludes that there is probable cause to believe that one or more of the above conditions for revocation or modification of the permit has occurred, the officer shall deliver written notice of revocation or modification to the Owner. Said notice shall specify the grounds of revocation or modification of the permit. Should the Owner of the animal wish to contest the revocation or modification of the permit, the Owner may request an administrative hearing to be held before a hearing officer, as designated by the Animal Control Program Manager, within seven (7) calendar days of receiving the notice of revocation. Said administrative hearing date shall be not less than seven (7) calendar days or no more than (20) twenty calendar days after the date the request for hearing is received by the Animal Control Manager. The administrative hearing shall be conducted as set forth in section 6-1.215 of this Article. The hearing officer conducting the hearing may either modify the terms of the permit or revoke the permit.

Any party to the hearing has the right to appeal the administrative hearing decision to the San Mateo County Superior Court by filing a Petition for a Writ of Administrative Mandate pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.5 and 1094.6.
(d) Upon written notice by the Animal Control Officer, peace officer, or hearing officer, if a hearing was held, if any modifications to a Dangerous Animal permit are made, the Owner shall immediately comply with such modified permit requirements.
(e) Upon written notice from an Animal Control Officer, peace officer or hearing officer of the revocation of a Dangerous Animal permit, the Owner of such animal shall within two (2) calendar days of such notification, surrender said animal to an Animal Control Officer. The Dangerous Animal shall be impounded and humanely euthanized unless the County designee or City designee has approved a different disposition. At the sole discretion of the appropriate City or County representative, such animal may be permanently removed from the County of San Mateo to another jurisdiction with written approval from that jurisdiction. 12 Packet Pg. 195
Pacifica City Council 23 January 08, 2024
6-1.212 - Possession of Animals After Revocation of Dangerous Animal Permit.

No Person who has been determined to be in possession of or had Ownership of a Dangerous Animal for which a permit has been revoked under this Article shall be granted any Dangerous Animal permit for a period of three years following such determination or revocation.
6-1.213 - Declaration of Vicious Animals.
(a) No Person shall keep, have, maintain, sell, trade, or let for hire an animal which has been designated as Vicious under the provisions of this Article. (b) If an Animal Control Officer and/or peace officer has investigated and determined that an animal is Vicious, the Animal Control Officer or peace officer shall deliver written notice of such determination to the Owner of the animal. Service of notice shall be made in accordance with section 6-

1.226 subdivision (a) of this Article. An Animal Control Officer and/or Peace Officer shall immediately impound the animal, or cause to be impounded, the animal according to the procedures set forth in Section 6-

1.216 of this Article. The animal shall be deemed abandoned and shall be humanely euthanized unless the County designee or City designee has approved a different disposition or unless the Owner timely requests an administrative hearing.
(c) In determining whether an animal shall be designated Vicious, in addition to any other facts and circumstances of the incident(s), the applicable decision-maker may consider the following potentially mitigating factors. (1) Whether at the time of the injury, attack or molestation, the Person or animal suffering the injury, attack, or molestation:
(i) provoked, tormented, teased, abused, or assaulted the animal, thereby causing or contributing to the alleged
behavior
(ii) committed a willful trespass or other tort upon the private property of the Owner or Caretaker of the animal; and/or (iii) threatened or committed an unjustified attack or assault against the Owner, Caretaker, or other Person in control of the charged animal.

The failure of the Owner or other Person in control of a victim animal to have the animal on a leash shall not, in itself, constitute a mitigating factor in any attack.
12 Packet Pg. 196
Pacifica City Council 24 January 08, 2024
(2) Whether the Owner is willing and able to comply with the conditions of a Dangerous Animal permit, and whether the animal can be safely maintained on a Dangerous Animal permit
considering the nature of the attack and cooperativeness and abilities of the Owner.
(d) The decision-maker may also consider, among any other relevant facts and circumstances, the following factors:
(1) whether any of the animals involved were previously deemed by any governmental jurisdiction as, "dangerous", "vicious", or any other similar designation, and/or the animal Owner’s prior compliance or lack thereof with any applicable Dangerous Animal permit requirements or this Article;
(2) the attacking animal’s history of attacks, bites or threatening behavior;
(3) whether the animal demonstrated such aggressive behavior that it is reasonable to conclude that the animal cannot be safely maintained with a Dangerous Animal permit; and
(4) whether the Owner is unable or unwilling to comply with the conditions of a Dangerous Animal permit.
(e) Should the Owner of the animal wish to contest the Vicious Animal designation, the Owner may request an administrative hearing to be conducted according to the procedures set forth in section 6-1.215 of this Article. The Owner shall submit a written request for a Vicious Animal hearing to the Animal Control Officer within seven (7) calendar days of the written notification by the Animal Control Officer and/or peace officer that the animal has been declared Vicious.
(f) Should the Owner not submit a request for an administrative hearing within the required timeframe, the administrative hearing process shall be deemed waived, the Vicious Animal designation will be considered final for purposes of exhaustion of administrative remedies, and the animal will be subject to disposition by the Animal Control Officer, peace officer, or City or County designee. The Owner shall lose all rights of Ownership and control of the animal, and the animal will be subject to humane euthanasia, unless another disposition is deemed appropriate by a City and/or County designee, without further notice to the Owner. (g) The unwillingness of a victim or a particular witness to testify at a hearing shall not prevent designation of an animal as Vicious as long as sufficient 12 Packet Pg. 197
Pacifica City Council 25 January 08, 2024
evidence exists to support the designation.
(h) If after investigation, an Animal Control Officer and/or peace officer determines that the animal is not Vicious, the Officer will prepare a written decision upon request by any victim suffering physical injury or an Owner of a victim animal, either of whom may appeal that determination. Any victim suffering physical injury as a result of the attack, or Owner of a victim animal, may appeal the determination that an animal is not Vicious by submitting, within seven (7) calendar days of the service of the decision pursuant to section 6-1.226, a written request to the Animal Control Officer for an administrative hearing and paying the required fee as set forth in Section 6-1.230 of this Article. The administrative hearing shall be conducted according to the procedures set forth in section 6-1.215 of this Article.
6-1.214 - Providing False Information.

It shall be unlawful for a Person to willfully and knowingly provide false or misleading information to Animal Control Program staff, including but not limited to an Animal Control Officer, peace officer, Animal Control Program Manager, and/or hearing officer regarding animal ownership, licensing, rabies vaccination, medical treatment and condition, and/or any other matter pertaining to the enforcement of state or local law. 6-1.215 - Administrative Hearing Procedures.
(a) Administrative hearings held under this Article shall be conducted by a hearing officer or designated representative appointed by the Director or designee of the San Mateo County Health Department. Any city contracting with the County for animal control services may elect to utilize the services of any San Mateo County designated hearing officer to conduct hearings on behalf of the city pursuant to that city's animal control ordinances. The hearings shall be scheduled no less than seven (7) calendar days and no more than fifteen (15) calendar days from the receipt of the request for the hearing unless the hearing officer finds good cause for continuance.
(b) The Animal Control Officer or peace officer conducting the investigation shall provide their investigation report and any evidence gathered by the officer to the Animal Control Program Manager or designee no less than 72 hours prior to said administrative hearing. The Animal Control Program Manager or designee will promptly provide the report to the parties to the case, including the Owner of the subject dog and the Owner of the victim dog.
(c) The administrative hearing shall be conducted in an informal manner consistent with due process of law. Any party may be represented by 12 Packet Pg. 198
Pacifica City Council 26 January 08, 2024
counsel. The parties may present relevant evidence including witnesses.

The strict rules of evidence shall not be applicable. Any relevant evidence, including but not limited to hearsay evidence, may be admitted if it is the sort of evidence on which reasonable Persons are accustomed to rely on in the conduct of serious affairs. The hearing officer shall decide the matter based on preponderance of the evidence presented at the hearing.

The administrative hearing shall be recorded, and all documentary evidence submitted at the administrative hearing shall be preserved by the Animal Control Program Manager for a period of no less than two years.

Any party may arrange for a court reporter to be present. Any party desiring the presence of a court reporter shall make all necessary arrangements and shall be responsible for payment of all costs. (d) The hearing officer may exclude disorderly or disruptive Persons from the hearing or make other orders as necessary to ensure the fair and orderly conduct of the administrative hearing.
(e) The hearing officer may decide all issues for or against the Owner(s) of the involved animal(s) even if the Owner(s) fail to appear at the hearing. (f) Within seven (7) calendar days of the administrative hearing, the hearing officer shall render a written decision, which shall be final for the purposes of exhaustion of administrative remedies upon the date of mailing. The Animal Control Program Manager or designee shall mail the written decision and affidavit/certificate of mailing showing the date of mailing, on behalf of the hearing officer, by first class mail, postage prepaid. The decision will be mailed to the Owner of the alleged Dangerous or Vicious Animal, the victim or Owner of the victim animal, and the investigating Animal Control Officer or peace officer.
(g) If the animal is designated Dangerous, the Owner must apply for and obtain a Dangerous Animal permit as provided by this Article within seven (7) calendar days of the decision letter in order to maintain the animal and the Owner must comply with all mandatory Dangerous Animal permit rules and regulations as defined in section 6-1.212 of this Article. A hearing officer may impose additional permit requirements as set forth in this Article.
(h) If the animal is designated Vicious, the Owner of such animal shall lose all rights of ownership and control of the animal, and the animal will be subject to humane euthanasia, unless another disposition is deemed appropriate by a City and/or County designee, without further notice to the Owner. An animal designated as Vicious will be held at the animal shelter for a minimum of seven (7) calendar days from the date of the hearing officer's decision, prior to any proposed euthanasia.
12 Packet Pg. 199
Pacifica City Council 27 January 08, 2024
(i) Unless the hearing officer for good cause otherwise determines, the party requesting the administrative hearing is liable for all costs related to such hearing. A determination by the hearing officer that the animal is not dangerous or vicious shall constitute good cause.
(j) Hearing officer decisions are appealable to the San Mateo County Superior Court by filing a Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandate pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.5 and 1094.6.
(k) The procedures and/or definitions pertaining to potentially dangerous and vicious dogs set forth in the California Food and Agricultural Code Article 9, beginning with section 31601, are not adopted and do not apply within San Mateo County. As authorized by Food and Agricultural Code section 31683, the County has adopted its own program for regulation of dangerous and vicious dogs as contained in this Article. 6-1.216 - Animals to Be Impounded.
(a) The Animal Control Program may impound any animal kept or found under conditions that constitute a violation of this Article or other state or local law. The animal's Owner shall be responsible for all costs incurred or fees applicable with respect to such impoundment and maintenance in the shelter.
(b) An Animal Control Officer or peace officer may impound or cause to be impounded an animal when there is reasonable cause to believe that such animal posed, or poses, a threat to the public’s health and safety, or the health and safety of another animal. The animal may remain impounded for a period not to exceed fifteen (15) calendar days in order to investigate, and to determine whether or not said animal is Dangerous or Vicious as defined by this Article. In calculating the fifteen (15) calendar days, the first day of impoundment is not included. If an animal is not impounded within fifteen (15) calendar days after an investigation began, the Animal Control Officer or peace officer shall make a determination whether or not the animal is Vicious or Dangerous and shall notify the Owner of said animal as soon as reasonably practical thereafter.
(c) Within twenty-four (24) hours of the impoundment of any animal, the impounding Animal Control Officer shall serve the Owner of the animal with notice of the impoundment.
(d) No impounded animal may be redeemed unless and until any required license fee and/or other applicable charges and fees have been paid. In the event such animal is not redeemed within the time set forth by State law, it shall be deemed abandoned and may be adopted, transferred to a 12 Packet Pg. 200
Pacifica City Council 28 January 08, 2024
rescue, or disposed of in the manner determined by the Animal Control Program. The Animal Control Program shall issue to the Owner or Person responsible of the care, custody, and control of said animal a receipt showing an itemized description and the amount of the fee(s) paid. (e) The Animal Control Program shall keep a record of all animals impounded, which record shall include a description of the animal, the date of its receipt, the date and manner of disposal, the name of the Person redeeming, adopting, or purchasing, the fees, and/or charges related to the animal. Said records shall be kept for a period of seven (7) years.
6-1.218 - Stray Animals.

Any Person who finds or picks up a stray or lost animal shall report the same to the Animal Control Shelter within twenty-four hours thereafter and shall release such animal to the Animal Control Shelter upon demand.
6-1.219 - Epidemics.

The San Mateo County Health Officer may determine and declare that rabies or other contagious diseases are epidemic or that other health and safety hazards exist among dogs or other animals within the County. Upon the making of such a declaration, the Health Officer shall prepare and promulgate such orders, rules, and regulations as are necessary for appropriate control of all the animals concerned within the County. Said rules and regulations of the Health Officer may include, but are not limited to, impoundment, quarantine, vaccination, or destruction. It shall be the duty of the Animal Control Officers to assist the Health Officer in carrying out such rules and regulations.
6-1.220 - Bite Reporting Requirements.
(a) Any Owner or other Person who is responsible for the care, custody, or control of an animal that bites a human or other animal shall provide their name and current residence address and telephone number and shall present their driver's license or other form of identification and any information regarding any rabies vaccination for the biting animal to the person bitten or the Owner of the animal bitten. If the Person bitten is a minor, the Owner or Person in control of the biting animal shall provide the required information to the parent or guardian of the minor. (b) In addition to the above requirements, it shall be the duty of any Person having knowledge of any animal which has bitten a human being or other animal within the County to immediately, in no case later than the end of the next calendar day, report the bite to an Animal Control Officer or peace officer and to furnish as much information as possible, including date, time and location of bite, description of animal or Person bitten, 12 Packet Pg. 201
Pacifica City Council 29 January 08, 2024
name and license number of the biting animal, and rabies vaccination history of the biting animal.
6-1.221 - Administrative Citations.
(a) Should an Animal Control Officer, Humane Officer or peace officer determine that a Person has violated any provision this Article, that enforcement officer shall have authority to issue and serve notice of an administrative citation as set forth in section 6-1.226, to the Person violating the Article.
(b) Each administrative citation shall contain the following information:
(1) The name and address of the Owner or other Person to be cited. (2) The date(s) of the violation.
(3) The address or a specific description of the location where the violation occurred.
(4) The section, subsection, and/or provision of this Article violated by the Person cited and a description of that violation.
(5) A prohibition of the continuation or repetition of the violation described in the administrative citation.
(6) If applicable a description of the potential consequence(s) should the violation continue or be repeated.
(7) Either:
i) The amount of the administrative fine charged and to be paid by the Person cited as a result of the violation; or
ii) A notice to correct a certain violation within a reasonable time, and the amount of an administrative fine that may occur if the violation is not corrected or remedied by the date specified.
(8) A description of the procedure to pay the fine, to include the time period for and place of payment, and the process by which the County may collect any unpaid amount owed.
(9) A description of the administrative citation review process, including the time within which the administrative citation may be appealed and how to appeal the administrative citation, including any form to 12 Packet Pg. 202
Pacifica City Council 30 January 08, 2024
do so.
(10) The name and signature of the citing Animal Control Officer, Humane Officer or peace officer or County designee.
(c) An administrative citation may be any format, including letter, which conveys the information set forth above.
6-1.222 - Appeal of Administrative Citation.
(a) A recipient of an administrative citation may contest the citation including, but not limited to, on the basis that the underlying violation did not occur, or that recipient is not the party responsible for the violation and thus was the improper recipient of the administrative citation. The recipient must contest the citation on the form provided by the Animal Program Manager or Animal Control Officer and file the appeal with the Animal Control Program Manager within twelve (12) calendar days from the date of service of the administrative citation. Any appeal not timely filed will be rejected.
(b) The appeal shall contain the following provided by the Person appealing the citation:
(1) The name, mailing address, and telephone number of the party requesting the appeal;
(2) A copy of the administrative citation or a reference number thereto; (3) A statement of the grounds for the contest, including a description of the evidence to be presented in support of the contest and copies of any statements or documents to be submitted at the hearing in support of the appeal.
(4) The signature of the appealing party;
(5) A deposit of the fine assessed as set forth in the citation(s), to be refunded if the appeal is successful.
(c) Should an appeal be properly and timely requested, the requesting party shall be provided a hearing before a hearing officer to be held pursuant to the procedures set forth in section 6-1.215 as applicable. The Animal Control Program shall notify the Person requesting the appeal hearing of the time and place set for the hearing pursuant to section 6-1.226. 6-1.223 - Payment of Administrative Fines.
12 Packet Pg. 203
Pacifica City Council 31 January 08, 2024
(a) In the absence of an appeal by the recipient of the administrative citation, the Person cited shall pay the administrative fine in full within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of service of the notice of citation. In the event of an appeal, after which the violation is upheld, if not already paid, the fine shall be paid in full within ten (10) calendar days after the date that the decision of the hearing officer was served on the recipient. (b) Payment of any fine shall not excuse the failure to correct the violation, nor shall it bar further enforcement of the same or any similar violation or any other violation by any applicable means.
(c) Failure to pay any fines assessed within the guidelines set forth in this Article will result in a late charge pursuant to section 6-1.224, which will be collected by the Animal Control Program Manager.
6-1.224 - Amount of Administrative Fines.
(a) Any Person issued an administrative citation for a violation of, and pursuant to, this Article shall be assessed and pay a fine as follows:
(1) One hundred dollars ($100) for a first citation.
(2) Two hundred dollars ($200) for a second citation for the same violation within a one-year period.
(3) Five hundred ($500) for each additional citation for the same violation within a one-year period.
6-1.225 - Misdemeanor Violations.
(a) A Person violating any provision of this Article shall be guilty of an infraction except as otherwise specifically provided.
(b) A Person violating any provision of section 6-1.205, subsection (a) of section 6-1.209 or subsection (a) of section 6-1.213 of this Article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
(c) This section shall not limit any other available criminal, civil or administrative remedies. Any or all applicable remedies shall remain available for violation of the provisions of this Article. 6-1.226 - Violation of Article a Public Nuisance; Remedies Cumulative. (a) Violation of this Article is a public nuisance subject to any and all applicable civil, administrative, and criminal remedies, according to the provisions and procedures set forth in this Article and other applicable 12 Packet Pg. 204
Pacifica City Council 32 January 08, 2024
state and local law.
(b) This section is not intended to limit any other available criminal, civil or administrative remedies. Any or all applicable administrative, civil and /or criminal remedies shall be available for violation of the provisions of this Article.
(c) Each day a violation continues shall constitute a separate violation. 6-1.226- SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS AND NOTICES.
(a) Unless otherwise specified herein, the appropriate representative of the Animal Control Program shall provide any required notice or service of documents in the one of the following manners: (1) by personal delivery to the Person to be notified or served; or (2) by posting on the property at the address where the subject animal is licensed or the Owner of such animal resides; or (3) by depositing in the United States Mail, in a sealed envelope, first class postage prepaid, and addressed to such Person to be notified or served at their last-known business or residence address or as the same appears in the last equalized County assessment roll. Service by mail shall be deemed complete at the time of deposit in the United States Mail receptacle and shall include a declaration or affidavit of service which shall include notice of the date mailed. If agreed in writing by the Person to be served, notices or documents may be served electronically at the address provided by the Person to be served, to be effective upon being sent.
(b) Failure to receive any notice specified herein does not affect the validity of proceedings conducted hereunder.
6-1.227 - Field Return Fee.

A fee shall be charged for any animal impounded by a representative of the Animal Control Program and returned by an Animal Control Officer in the field to the Owner or Person who is responsible for the care, custody, or control of the animal. The fee charged shall be paid by the Owner or Person who is responsible for the care, custody, or control of said animal. Such fee shall be set forth in Section 6-1.230. 6-1.228 - Redemption and Spay/Neuter Fee.
(a) Upon redemption of any impounded unaltered animal, the Person responsible for the care, custody or control of any animal will be required to pay a spay or neuter fee in the amount of $100.00 in addition to the impound fees imposed under Section 6-1.230 of this Article. Such fee shall be refundable upon proof of spay and neuter of the animal within thirty (30) calendar days following the date of redemption.
12 Packet Pg. 205
Pacifica City Council 33 January 08, 2024
(b) Any unaltered animal impounded twice or more within a three-year period shall be altered at a cost to be paid by the Owner/Caretaker or person responsible for the care, custody, or control of said animal prior to redemption. At the option of the Owner/Caretaker or Person responsible for the care, custody, or control of said animal, required spaying or neutering may be performed by a private veterinarian within thirty (30) calendar days.
(c) Any Owner or Caretaker of an impounded animal subject to mandatory spay/neuter under Subsection (b) of this Section may appeal this requirement by submitting a written request for an administrative hearing to the Animal Control Program Manager. The administrative hearing will be conducted according to the provisions of Section 6-1.215 of this Article. (d) The Animal Control Program Manager may waive any County or City fee for County or City spay/neuter, vaccination or impoundment of an animal, if the animal is a feral or stray cat and the Person bringing the animal to the shelter agrees that the Person shall have no rights in the animal or any right to direct or control treatment or disposition of the animal by the Animal Control Program which will retain sole discretion in determining the disposition of the animal, which may include but not be limited to treatment and/or adoption, or euthanasia.
6-1.229 - Quarantine Fee.

A quarantine fee, as set forth in Section 6-1.230, shall be paid by the Owner or Caretaker of any animal involved, or potentially involved, in a bite. Such quarantine fee is in addition to any other fees charged set forth in Section 6-1.230 of this Article to recover costs incurred by the Animal Control Program for the sheltering and caring for the quarantined animal.
6-1.230 - Schedule of Fees and Charges.

This Section 6-1.230 sets forth the fees for the Animal Control Program and Licensing Program. No animal shall be released to its Owner, or other person responsible for the care, custody, or control of the animal, unless applicable fees have been paid.

Animal Control and Licensing fees and charges established by this code are as follows:
(a)
(a) License Fees.

Dogs
Unaltered dog
1-year license $55.00
12 Packet Pg. 206
Pacifica City Council 34 January 08, 2024
3-year license $160.00
Unaltered dog Senior Pet Owner (over 60 yrs.)
1-year license
3-year license
$23.00
$64.00
Altered dog
1-year license $25.00
3-year license $70.00
Altered dog Senior Pet Owner (over 60 yrs.)
1-year license $10.00
3-year license $25.00
Misc. dog fees
Late fee $20.00
Duplicate tag $10.00
Cats
Unaltered cat
1-year license $20.00
3-year license $55.00
Unaltered cat Senior Pet Owner (over 60 yrs.)
1-year license
3-year license
$12.00
$31.00
Altered cat
1-year license $8.00
3-year license $19.00
Altered cat/ Senior Pet Owner (over 60 yrs.)
1-year license $5.00
3-year license $12.00
Misc. cat fees
Late fee $7.00
Duplicate tag $5.00
(b) Redemption Charges
12 Packet Pg. 207
Pacifica City Council 35 January 08, 2024
Type A & B (large or medium size animals — horses, cows, hogs, sheep, etc.)
Impound cost $100.00
Board cost per day $30.00
Trailering cost (per use) $100.00
Type C (dogs, and cats)
Impound Costs — First Impound
Altered — licensed, wearing tag $40.00
Unaltered — licensed, wearing tag $65.00
Altered — unlicensed, no tag $55.00
Unaltered — unlicensed, no tag $85.00
Impound Costs — Second Impound
Altered — licensed, wearing tag $90.00
Unaltered — licensed, wearing tag $125.00
Altered — unlicensed, no tag $105.00
Unaltered — unlicensed, no tag $140.00
Impound Costs — Third Impound
Altered — licensed, wearing tag $135.00
Unaltered — licensed, wearing tag $155.00
Altered — unlicensed, no tag $155.00
Unaltered — unlicensed, no tag $180.00
Impound Costs — Fourth Impound
Altered — licensed, wearing tag $180.00
Unaltered — licensed, wearing tag $215.00
Altered — unlicensed, no tag $200.00
Unaltered — unlicensed, no tag $240.00
Impound Costs — Fifth Impound and up
Altered — licensed, wearing tag $225.00
Unaltered — licensed, wearing tag $260.00
Altered — unlicensed, no tag $245.00
Unaltered — unlicensed, no tag $285.00
Board charges (per day)
Altered — dogs/ $25.00
12 Packet Pg. 208
Pacifica City Council 36 January 08, 2024
Unaltered — dogs/ $35.00
Altered — cats $16.00
Unaltered — cats $22.00
Type D (small size animals, e.g., birds, hamsters, or other) Impound cost $20.00
Board cost $10.00
(c) Surrender, Euthanasia and DOA (Dead on Arrival) Disposal Fees Dog — Licensed or unlicensed
Surrender $60.00
Euthanasia $50.00
DOA Disposal $30.00
Cat — Licensed or unlicensed
Surrender $60.00
Euthanasia $50.00
DOA Disposal $30.00
Rabbit/Small Animal
Surrender $40.00
Euthanasia $30.00
DOA Disposal $15.00
Litter of Three or more
Surrender $50.00
Euthanasia $40.00
DOA Disposal $20.00
Bird/Fowl
Surrender $20.00
Euthanasia $15.00
DOA Disposal $20.00
All Other Companion Animals (Reptiles, Amphibians, etc.) Surrender $25.00
Euthanasia $25.00
DOA Disposal $20.00
12 Packet Pg. 209
Pacifica City Council 37 January 08, 2024
Farm Animals
Surrender $60.00
Euthanasia: Under 100 pounds
Over 100 pounds
$60.00
$125.00
DOA Disposal: Under 100 Pounds
Over 100 pounds
$30.00
$100.00
(d) Other Animal Control Fees
Quarantine Fee $60.00
Dangerous Animal Permit (DAP) Fee $300.00
DAP Inspection Fee $100.00
DAP Signage $15.00
Field Retrieval/Return Fee $40.00
Breeding Permit Fee $150.00
Fancier Permit and/or Exotic Pet Fee $100.00
Return Check Fee $25.00
Service Dog Application Processing Fee $50.00
(b) Miscellaneous Fee Provisions
(1) The Animal Control Program, and/or Licensing Program, may establish license discounts for recognized animal rescue organizations. (2) License fees include a one dollar ($1) annual surcharge on all licenses for the animal population trust fund.
(3) At the discretion of the Animal Control Program Manager, a payment plan for all fees outstanding may be permitted upon a showing of good cause.

If a Person is in compliance with an agreed upon payment plan, their outstanding balance shall never be considered “nonpayment” as that term is used in this Article.
(4) The animal control fees for any animal related service not specified in this section shall be reviewed by the Chief of Health or their designee for reimbursement of costs. The Chief of Health or their designee shall have the authority to determine the fee charged for said services. The fee charged shall be paid by the Owner or Caretaker of the animal(s) for which said service(s) have been 12 Packet Pg. 210
Pacifica City Council 38 January 08, 2024
provided.
(5) Each calendar year, the Animal Control Program Manager shall designate one month as an amnesty period for payment of cat and dog license late fees and for compliance with section 6-1.202 of this Article, as provided herein. During the amnesty period, applicants for cat and dog licenses shall not be assessed any late penalty fee or any other penalty for failure to obtain such license or pay any applicable license fee, notwithstanding sections 6-1.204 and 6-

1.230 of this Article.
(6) All revenue derived from the fees, fines, forfeitures, and penalties related to the enforcement of this ordinance shall be used to offset the cost of enforcement and administration of this Article. (7) If the Animal Control Program Manager determines that payment of any fees by the Owner or Caretaker for an impounded animal would cause extreme financial difficulty to the Owner or Caretaker, and that it is in the best interests of the County to allow release of the animal upon these terms, the Animal Control Program Manager may, at their discretion, set up a payment plan or waive all or part of the fees incurred for the animal.
6-1.231 – Scope.

The provisions of this Article shall be in effect in the unincorporated areas of this County and, except where so adopted, are not applicable to any City. 6-1.232 – Severability.

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Article should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, subsection, clause, phrase, or word of this Article.” SECTION 2. Compliance with CEQA. The City Council hereby finds that the action to adopt this Ordinance is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. and the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15000 et. seq.), including without limitation, Public Resources Code section 21065 and California Code of Regulations 15378 as this is not a “project” that may cause a direct, or reasonably foreseeable indirect, physical change in the environment and if a “project,” is exempt under the “common sense” exception (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3)) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that this action may have a significant effect on the environment.
12 Packet Pg. 211
Pacifica City Council 39 January 08, 2024
SECTION 3. Publication. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to certify the passage of this Ordinance by the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, and cause the same to be published in accordance with State law.

SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effective thirty (30) days after its adoption and shall be published and posted as required by law.

This ordinance shall become effective thirty days after adoption. • • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the ____ day of ________, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
_________________________________
Sue Vaterlaus, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ _________________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 12 Packet Pg. 212
Pacifica City Council 40 January 08, 2024
* * * * *
(ID # 5555) at 1/8/2024 6:30 PM City Council Regular Meeting 12 Packet Pg. 213
Estimated Fee Increase Analysis by City
22-23 Year Control rev
less control & licensing
exp less licensing rev
CY 2022 licensing
revenue

TOTAL OF AC&L
Rev less exp
$5,632,725 $1,254,246 $6,886,970
CITY Service Level Service Level Field Animals Service Level Final Final CY 2022 Licensing Revenue Adjusted Percentage Percentage Services Received Percentage 2022-2023 2022-23 Percent Percent Distribution 2022-2023 City Cost
CY 2019 Actual
Yr 2 CY 2020
Actual CY2021 CY2021
Yr 3 CY 2021
Actual
Before subtracting license
revenue % of total revenue
Licensing Revenue
Collected
Estimated 22-23
City Cost w/ Fee
Increase
22-23 Estimated
City Cost w/out
Fee Increase
Estimated
Cost Increase
(Decrease) per
City with Fee
Increase
Atherton 1.07% 1.02% 1.09% 0.93% 1.00% 1.03% $70,808 1.18% $ 14,809 $55,999 $58,721 ($2,722) Belmont 2.65% 2.92% 3.28% 2.36% 2.74% 2.77% $190,597 4.49% $ 56,303 $134,294 $144,502 ($10,207) Brisbane 0.88% 0.48% 0.57% 0.51% 0.54% 0.63% $43,470 0.70% $ 8,829 $34,641 $36,258 ($1,617) Burlingame 3.41% 4.36% 4.06% 3.62% 3.80% 3.86% $265,833 4.85% $ 60,791 $205,042 $216,179 ($11,137) Colma 0.40% 0.54% 0.59% 0.38% 0.46% 0.47% $32,396 0.21% $ 2,634 $29,762 $30,284 ($522) Daly City 9.92% 10.04% 8.13% 10.59% 9.58% 9.85% $678,260 7.55% $ 94,687 $583,573 $601,405 ($17,832) East Palo Alto 8.04% 7.94% 5.96% 9.54% 8.07% 8.02% $552,159 1.04% $ 13,090 $539,069 $542,384 ($3,315) Foster City 2.49% 3.07% 4.23% 2.89% 3.44% 3.00% $206,791 3.97% $ 49,790 $157,001 $166,098 ($9,096) Half Moon Bay 1.94% 2.29% 1.60% 1.62% 1.61% 1.95% $134,104 2.82% $ 35,347 $98,757 $105,194 ($6,437) Hillsborough 1.83% 1.82% 1.68% 1.47% 1.55% 1.74% $119,529 2.65% $ 33,241 $86,288 $92,326 ($6,038) Menlo Park 5.10% 4.81% 4.69% 4.18% 4.39% 4.77% $328,220 3.67% $ 46,041 $282,179 $290,844 ($8,665) Millbrae 2.29% 2.09% 2.48% 2.06% 2.23% 2.20% $151,856 2.65% $ 33,215 $118,641 $124,739 ($6,098) Pacifica 6.06% 4.80% 6.08% 4.81% 5.33% 5.40% $371,752 7.38% $ 92,593 $279,159 $296,045 ($16,886) Portola Valley 0.41% 0.58% 0.61% 0.42% 0.50% 0.50% $34,121 1.34% $ 16,780 $17,341 $20,345 ($3,004) Redwood City 13.92% 12.33% 12.90% 15.92% 14.68% 13.64% $939,701 12.55% $ 157,456 $782,245 $811,535 ($29,290) San Bruno 5.80% 5.26% 3.79% 5.25% 4.65% 5.23% $360,397 5.73% $ 71,818 $288,579 $301,823 ($13,244) San Carlos 2.90% 2.89% 4.25% 2.49% 3.21% 3.00% $206,582 5.43% $ 68,099 $138,483 $150,783 ($12,299) San Mateo 13.71% 13.55% 13.93% 15.94% 15.11% 14.12% $972,619 15.16% $ 190,096 $782,523 $817,600 ($35,077) S. San Francisco 9.75% 10.02% 8.35% 10.18% 9.43% 9.73% $670,307 7.69% $ 96,443 $573,864 $591,988 ($18,124) Woodside 1.02% 1.31% 1.68% 1.37% 1.50% 1.27% $87,759 1.28% $ 16,102 $71,657 $74,629 ($2,972) County 6.41% 7.87% 10.06% 3.48% 6.18% 6.82% $469,708 7.66% $ 96,082 $373,626 $391,308 ($17,682) Total 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% $6,886,969 100.00% $1,254,246 $5,632,723 $5,864,987 ($232,264) Estimated Fee Increase Analysis by City
as of 11/22/2023

12.a
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Attachment A: Estimated Fee Increase Analysis by City (5555 : Ordinance Introduction - City
% of Total
Revenue
Collected Revenue Collected w/ Fee Increase Total
Atherton 1.18% $ 12,219.00 $ 2,590.27 $ 14,809.27
Belmont 4.49% $ 46,452.50 $ 9,850.07 $ 56,302.57
Brisbane 0.70% $ 7,293.00 $ 1,535.65 $ 8,828.65
Burlingame 4.85% $50,151.25 $ 10,639.83 $ 60,791.08
Colma 0.21% $ 2,173.25 $ 460.69 $ 2,633.94
Daly City 7.55% $ 78,124.25 $ 16,563.04 $ 94,687.29
East Palo Alto 1.04% $ 10,808.00 $ 2,281.53 $ 13,089.53 Foster City 3.97% $ 41,080.21 $ 8,709.31 $ 49,789.52
Half Moon Bay 2.82% $ 29,161.00 $ 6,186.46 $ 35,347.46
Hillsborough 2.65% $ 27,427.00 $ 5,813.52 $ 33,240.52
Menlo Park 3.67% $ 37,990.25 $ 8,051.17 $ 46,041.42
Millbrae 2.65% $ 27,401.50 $ 5,813.52 $ 33,215.02
Pacifica 7.38% $ 76,402.75 $ 16,190.10 $ 92,592.85
Portola Valley 1.34% $ 13,840.50 $ 2,939.67 $ 16,780.17 Redwood City 12.55% $ 129,924.25 $ 27,531.94 $ 157,456.19 San Bruno 5.73% $ 59,248.00 $ 12,570.36 $ 71,818.36
San Carlos 5.43% $ 56,186.50 $ 11,912.23 $ 68,098.73
San Mateo 15.16% $ 156,838.11 $ 33,257.70 $ 190,095.81
South San Francisco 7.69% $ 79,572.84 $ 16,870.17 $ 96,443.01 Woodside 1.28% $ 13,294.00 $ 2,808.04 $ 16,102.04
County 7.66% $ 79,277.75 $ 16,804.35 $ 96,082.10
100.00% $ 1,034,866 $ 219,380 $ 1,254,246
Animal Licensing CY 2022

12.a
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Attachment A: Estimated Fee Increase Analysis by City (5555 : Ordinance Introduction - Animal Control)

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/8/2024
1 SUBJECT:

Update regarding the community engagement plan for the Local Coastal Land Use Plan (LCLUP) certification process.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Consider and approve a revised community engagement plan for Pacifica’s efforts to obtain CCC certification of the LCLUP, and confirm reprioritization of Strategic Plan workplan items assigned to the Planning Department.

STAFF CONTACT:

Christian Murdock, AICP, Planning Director
(650) 738-7341
[email protected]
Stefanie Cervantes, AICP, Senior Planner
(650) 738-7341
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

On October 9, 2023, the City Council approved a three-meeting community engagement plan to update the public on where the Local Coastal Land Use Plan (LCLUP) update process stands, and to discuss where it should go next. Additional information on the City’s work to update the LCLUP component of the City’s Local Coastal Program (LCP), which started in 2009, is available in the City Council agenda reports for the City Council meetings on October 9 (Agenda Item No. 10), November 13 (Agenda Item No. 1), and December 5, 2023 (Agenda Item No. 1).

The City is at the stage in the LCLUP update process where it must consider suggested modifications1to the City Council-approved LCLUP proposed by California Coastal Commission (CCC) staff. The CCC staff released these suggested modifications in late February 2023 as part of the CCC’s agenda for its March 8, 2023, meeting. The community engagement plan approved by the City Council was designed to address the CCC’s suggested modifications in three stages of public meetings as outlined below, starting with a City Council study session, followed by a community roundtable discussions meeting, and then concluding with a City Council consideration item, with public input accepted at each of these three meetings:
• Meeting #1: City Council Study Session
o Purpose: Study session to present and discuss the CCC staff suggested modifications from March 8, 2023.
o Timing: November 13, 2023
• Meeting #2: Community Roundtable Discussions
1 Available under Agenda Item No. 14.a for the meeting on Wednesday, March 8, 2023, at https://www.coastal.ca.gov/meetings/agenda/#/2023/3.
13 Packet Pg. 216
Pacifica City Council 2
January 08, 2024
o Purpose: Provide a staff presentation followed by a community roundtable discussion of potential alternative modifications to those presented by CCC staff for the March 8, 2023 CCC meeting, based on discussions between City and CCC staffs that started in June 2023.
o Facilitation: Due to the complexity of the subject matter discussed at this community meeting, a professional facilitation service facilitated the roundtable conversations. City staff notetakers supplemented the facilitators to ensure comprehensive collection of community input.
o Timing: December 5, 2023
• Meeting #3: City Council Consideration of a Comment Letter to CCC o Purpose: The third meeting was originally planned to be a City Council consideration item to discuss a potential comment letter from the City requesting revisions to the CCC staff's March 2023 suggested modifications. Transmittal of this comment letter would need to be sufficiently in advance of a CCC certification hearing on the Revised Certification Draft LCLUP to allow time for CCC staff to analyze the City’s requests and publish a staff recommendation.

Staff recommends transmitting the comment letter at least two months, but ideally three months, prior to a desired CCC certification hearing. o Timing: Currently anticipated in early-February 2024 (previously anticipated midto late-January 2024) The City Manager highlighted in the October 9 staff report that revisions to or refinement of the above-outlined community engagement process should continue to allow completion of the process by end of February 2024, and that any potential revisions to the 3-meeting process should consider impacts to the numerous other Strategic Plan priorities the City is undertaking in this same timeframe. The City Manager also indicated that continuation of the community engagement process beyond February 2024 may cause a CCC certification hearing to occur later than June 2024.

While the June 2024 timeline for a CCC certification hearing is not a statutory requirement, it is an important deadline pertaining to the City’s Strategic Plan and the timeline City staff and CCC staff have discussed in collaborative efforts to date. Certification of the Sharp Park Specific Plan, adopted by City Council in 2022, is contingent on the certification of the LCLUP. While projects in the City’s Strategic Plan Workplan can continue under the 1980 LCLUP, successful certification of the 2040 LCLUP and Sharp Park Specific Plan will allow for more clarity in the regulations and benefit other priority projects, such as the Beach Boulevard Infrastructure Resiliency project, 2212 Beach Blvd Development, and the Sharp Park Library project.

Additionally, continuing extensive work on an elongated timeline to achieve 2040 LCLUP certification will create staff constraints to work on numerous important Strategic Plan priorities.

Meeting #2: December 5, 2023
The community gathering for a staff presentation and roundtable discussions on December 5 included 157 confirmed attendees and several additional attendees who declined to check-in at the staff table. Attendance at this meeting was among the highest of any City-sponsored meeting in recent memory. The high level of participation confirmed the continued significant community interest in the LCLUP update process.

The City staff presentation2 at the beginning of the December 5 meeting focused on a critical set of potential alternative modifications, introducing to the community for the first time the concept of Special Resiliency Areas, or SRAs. These SRAs would effectively “carve out” large portions 2 Presentation slides available on the Project Documents page at https://www.planpacifica.org. 13 Packet Pg. 217
Pacifica City Council 3
January 08, 2024
of the Rockaway Beach and West Sharp Park neighborhoods from the standard policies contained in the LCLUP, applying a different set of focused policies that would generally be more permissive of development, subject to certain limitations, but in no case less permissive than the CCC staff suggested modifications from March 2023. Due to the complexity and implications of the SRAs and associated policies, it was not possible to discuss other potential alternative modifications at the December 5 meeting.

Staff received positive feedback from many attendees of Meeting #2. These participants appreciated the opportunity to learn about a new potential approach with the SRA policies, and to participate in a substantive discussion about the LCLUP update. Not all feedback from attendees was positive, however. Many had questions about the new SRA information, and the LCLUP update process overall, which they felt were unanswered at the meeting. City Council members have received similar feedback from their constituents.

Consideration of a Revised Community Engagement Plan
Based on the feedback received by participants at the December 5 community meeting, the City Manager recommends that further consideration of the community engagement plan by City Council is needed to decide whether the previously-approved engagement plan remains sufficient for completion of the LCLUP process. The City Manager recommends that a change to the plan is appropriate to most effectively address the main concerns expressed by participants in Meeting #2, and to balance the impact to other Strategic Plan priorities and timing of an LCLUP hearing by the CCC.

Recommendation for a Revised Meeting #3
While Meeting #3 was originally envisioned to involve City Council approval of a comment letter to CCC, the City Manager now recommends that Meeting #3 involve a special meeting consisting of a question-and-answer (“Q&A”) format. The original format for Meeting #3 would now become Meeting #4.

A special meeting on a weekend would be the most effective to accomplish the meeting’s primary objective to inform the community on all potential alternative modifications, to answer the community’s questions, and allow time for Council discussion after the Q&A session. A weekend meeting with a morning start time would allow sufficient time to answer as many questions from community members as possible. The meeting would include a coffee service throughout the morning and a box lunch service for the public, Council, and staff. Saturday, February 3, 2024, is currently identified as the most feasible date to conduct Meeting #3, with all of City Council available on that date.

The morning session would be dedicated to answering questions from the public, focused primarily on answering questions submitted in advance of the meeting, which will allow sufficient time for staff to thoroughly consider and prepare answers. The morning session would also include a limited period, approximately one hour, to receive questions not submitted in advance, and to answer them to the extent possible. Due to the complexity of the LCLUP subject matter, submission of questions in advance is essential to allow staff time to provide the most responsive answers possible.

The afternoon session would provide an opportunity for City Council members to engage in a Q&A with staff and consider providing direction on potential alternative modifications for final discussion and decision at Meeting #4. The agenda packet for Meeting #3 would include the draft comment letter to CCC including all potential alternative modifications that will be eventually discussed and decided by Council at Meeting #4. In addition, the packet for Meeting #3 would also include a special case studies report and FAQs, developed with assistance of additional planning consultant services, to help illustrate the importance of key potential 13 Packet Pg. 218
Pacifica City Council 4
January 08, 2024
alternative modifications. Development of the packet materials for Meeting #3 will be informed by the community discussions and input from the December 5th meeting (Meeting #2).

New Meeting #4
In the event of a revised Meeting #3, as described above, a new Meeting #4 would become necessary. The purpose of Meeting #4 would be to allow City Council consideration of a potential comment letter from the City requesting revisions to the CCC staff's March 2023 suggested modifications. Transmittal of this comment letter would need to be sufficiently in advance of a CCC certification hearing on the Revised Certification Draft LCLUP to allow time for CCC staff to analyze the City’s requests and publish a staff recommendation. This comment letter should be transmitted at least two months, but ideally three months, prior to a desired CCC certification hearing.

Based on the anticipated timing of Meeting #3 in early February 2024, the City Manager recommends the timing of Meeting #4 to occur in late-February/early-March 2024, and should be a consideration item as part of a standard City Council agenda, whether at a regular or special meeting, depending on the specific timing.

City Council Direction Requested
Should City Council support the approach outlined above to schedule a revised Meeting #3 and new Meeting #4, the City Manager requests direction on a couple details associated with the planning and conduct of Meeting #3:
1) What is the appropriate venue? Should the meeting be conducted at the Community Center or elsewhere? A venue other than the Community Center could affect meeting scheduling, depending on availability. An alternative venue may also increase costs to conduct the meeting due to booking fees and any equipment rentals needed. 2) Should a professional meeting facilitator be engaged? A professional meeting facilitator could help manage the Q&A portion of the meeting to remain within the determined process and timeline. Professional facilitation support will add cost to the meeting.

The following additional factors are also relevant for the Council’s consideration of whether to add a meeting to the community engagement plan:
1) Impacts on Other Strategic Plan Workplan Items. Adding another meeting to the community engagement plan will impact other Strategic Plan workplan items. The Planning Department already has a significant assigned workload in the Strategic Plan workplan for Fiscal Year 2023-2024. Adding an additional meeting, with the significant technical and logistical preparations required, will delay staff’s work on the short-term rental (STR) ordinance update and tree protection ordinance update by at least one month. Other modifications to the community engagement plan beyond the City Manager’s recommendation could extend this delay and could potentially impact other priority items, such as completion of work associated with the Housing Element, implementation of Housing Element programs (set to begin in 2024), and certification of the Outdoor Commercial Permit ordinance.
2) Additional Coordination with CCC Staff. Depending on the final provisions in a comment letter approved by City Council to request alternative modifications by the CCC, it is possible that City staff will need to engage in further discussions with CCC staff to ascertain whether they will recommend approval of the alternative modifications to the CCC. It is possible that multiple staff-to-staff meetings will need to occur, with the possibility of additional consideration by City Council to consider any revisions to the 13 Packet Pg. 219
Pacifica City Council 5
January 08, 2024
comment letter. This process could take up to two months, depending on the significance of the alternative modifications.
3) Overall Timeline for LCLUP Action by CCC and Final Action by Council. Work to update the LCLUP has been ongoing for over 10 years. Prolonging the adoption process will delay efforts by the City to modernize land use planning and other policies within the Coastal Zone. Prolonging LCLUP certification also increases the potential for inconsistencies with the General Plan, and will complicate development project approval, which will be particularly challenging for larger-scale projects that may be proposed such as housing (including affordable housing) and economic development objectives (including redevelopment of the Council Chambers site at 2212 Beach Boulevard) in the Coastal Zone.

The timeline for LCLUP action should be understood to not only include this next action by Council to seek CCC certification, but also the necessary post-CCC certification action required by the City. This will include Planning Commission and City Council public hearings to adopt the revisions certified by the CCC. This process will take at least two to three months following final CCC action and is necessary before the LCLUP will take effect.

CONCLUSION
The original community engagement plan approved by the City Council was designed to address the CCC’s suggested modifications in three stages of public meetings. During the second meeting (December 5th), staff received feedback requesting more information and responses to numerous questions. Given the importance of this LCLUP Update, the City Manager recommends adding an additional community meeting beyond the original threemeeting community engagement plan. Such a revised community engagement plan would allow for more community input and understanding about potential alternative modifications before the Council’s consideration of a comment letter from the City requesting revisions to the CCC staff's March 2023 suggested modifications. Adding one additional meeting will also create only minor delays in other Strategic Plan priorities for the Planning Department, and will also enable targeting a CCC certification hearing date by June 2024, depending on the significance of the alternative modifications. The City Manager does not recommend adding more than one additional community meeting, due to the impacts a longer certification process would have on many other City Council Strategic Plan priorities.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

The Council may choose not to add an additional meeting to the community engagement plan, or to add more than one additional meeting. Either course of action will have timing and cost implications on completion of the LCLUP update.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

The Local Coastal Land Use Plan is consistent with the following item(s) in the Council-adopted Strategic Plan and Priority Work Plan for FY 2023-24:
● Goal 4: Pursue climate change adaptation and mitigation. ○ Strategy C: Update Pacifica’s Local Coastal Plan and improve communications and collaboration with the California Coastal Commission.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Staff’s ongoing work toward LCLUP certification can be accomplished within regular Planning Department operations and does not require an additional appropriation at this time. A new and expeditied consultant services agreement, preliminarily estimated to be within the City 13 Packet Pg. 220
Pacifica City Council 6
January 08, 2024
Manager’s approval authority of $50,000, is anticipated to be needed to assist staff in developing the special case studies report and FAQs.

The community engagement process directed by City Council may have a direct fiscal impact (to be determined). Community meetings have a direct cost of at least $3,000-5,000 inclusive of meeting supplies and other logistics, including food/refreshments for attendees.

ORIGINATED BY:

Planning Department
ATTACHMENT LIST:
13 Packet Pg. 221

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
1/8/2024
1 SUBJECT:
2024 City Council Liaison and Committee Assignments
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Review the list of City Council Liaison and Committee Assignments, make any modifications for the calendar year 2024, and approve the final list.

STAFF CONTACT:

Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
650-738-7307
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

Each year the City Council determines which of its members will represent the City in relation to a variety of regional agencies, Joint Powers Authorities, boards, committees, commissions and community organizations. In some cases, the assigned Council member is a voting member of the body; in others, they serve as a liaison between the designated group and the City. In all cases, the Council member acts on behalf of the full Council and represents a majority viewpoint on matters that directly affect the City of Pacifica. Council members serving as representatives to these groups report back on activities during regularly scheduled Council meetings.

The assignments are typically reviewed and updated in January of each year to reflect changes associated with Council reorganization conducted in the previous December. Attachment A shows the 2023 City Council Liaison and Committee Assignments for Council to review, discuss and modify for the calendar year 2024. The list includes a column to indicate the Council liaison’s role on the specified body / committee, indicating whether the role is as a voting member, a liaison to observe and/or provide information in an advisory capacity from the City, or as a Council liaison to a City Committee or Commission. Attachment B includes additional meeting information, descriptions of each committee and weblinks for additional information on each body where applicable for outside agencies.

Please note that some committees have alternates while others do not. The ultimate decision on all assignments (except those made by C/CAG or other legislative bodies / agencies as noted) is at the Council's discretion. Considerations for appointing primary and alternate Council representatives should be determined in compliance with California’s Ralph M. Brown Act. The Council may choose to appoint one primary representative as the liaison and one alternate to a City committee or commission where the decision is at the Council’s discretion.

Attachment A also includes, for informational purposes, Ad Hoc City Council Subcommittee assignments for those that are currently active or had been active in 2023. At times, the Council may form and appoint two members (less than a quorum of members) to ad hoc City Council subcommittees to meet, as needed, charged with accomplishing a specific task in a limited and definite period of time on an informal and temporary basis without a regularly scheduled 14 Packet Pg. 222
Pacifica City Council 2
January 08, 2024
meeting date/time. For example, the 2023 Pride Planning Ad Hoc Subcommittee was discussed at the December 12, 2022 regular City Council meeting, at which time Councilmembers Bier and Beckmeyer were appointed to meet and work with Coast Pride in planning the 2023 Pacifica Pride celebration in June of 2023. The need for the ad hoc subcommittee was concluded in the summer of 2023 after the Pride event had taken place and the ad hoc members have had a chance to debrief following the event. Such Ad Hoc Subcommittees are exempt from the provisions of California’s Ralph M. Brown Act. The discussion should note the status of any ad hoc subcommittees that were active in 2023; for those that have been concluded, the list for 2024 will be updated to remove their reference.

Council is asked to discuss and determine the liaison assignments for 2024. At this time, the City Council may also discuss and consider or reflect any additional liaison assignments to include in the list for 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

ORIGINATED BY:

City Clerk
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment A: 2023 Council Liaison Assignments (PDF)
Attachement B: Committee Descriptions (PDF)
14 Packet Pg. 223
AGENCY Council Representative(s) Council Alternate Role Meeting information ** Weblink ABAG General Assembly Delegate BIGSTYCK BECKMEYER Voting Delegate late May / early June annual meetings; 9am- 3pm https://abag.ca.gov/meetings Airport Community Roundtable BOLES VATERLAUS Voting Member 1st Wednesday 7:00pm, Millbrae Chetcuti Center https://sforoundtable.org/ C/CAG Representative VATERLAUS BECKMEYER Voting Member 2nd Thursday, 6:30 pm SMC Transit District www.ccag.ca.govColma Creek Flood Control Citizens Advisory Committee VATERLAUS BOLES Voting Member 2nd Tuesday of the Month (Quarterly) 3pm - 5pmSouth San Francisco Corp Yard Conf. Room https://www.smc-connect.org/locations/colma-creek-floodcontrol-zone-advisory-committee-of-san-mateo-county Emergency Services Council SMC VATERLAUS BIGSTYCK Voting Member 3 times yearly; Jan., May, Sept. 5:30 p.m. https://www.smcgov.org/ceo/emergency-management- governanceFog Fest Committee Liaison VATERLAUS BECKMEYER City Liaison 3rd Wednesday each montn https://pacificcoastfogfest.com/about-us/ Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) - Member Agency Committee (MAC) VATERLAUS BIER Voting Member 1-2 Times a year for budget review https://www.heartofsmc.org/Housing Our People Effectively (HOPE) - Inter Agency Council (IAC) BIER VATERLAUS Voting Member Qtrly 10a.m. - 400 Harbor Blvd. Bldg. B, Belmont https://www.smcgov.org/hsa/san-mateo-county-hope- interagency-councilJoint School Dist./Water Dist./City Articulation Committee BIER & BECKMEYER City Liaison As announced - typically Thurs. 5pm (quarterly)North County Fire Authority JPA BIGSTYCK & BOLES Voting Member As announced (annually in May) https://northcountyfire.org/North Coast County Water District (NCCWD) BIER BECKMEYER City Liaison (observe only) 3rd Wednesday 7:00pm at NCCWD District Headquarters, 2400 Francisco Blvd https://www.nccwd.comPacifica Community Television BIER VATERLAUS Voting Member 3rd Thurs 7:30pm Council Chambers http://pacificcoast.tv/Pacific Beach Coalition BOLES BIER City Liaison (Non- Voting) 2nd Tuesday 6:00 p.m. Pacifica Library https://www.pacificbeachcoalition.org/Pacifica Resource Center BIGSTYCK BIER City Liaison (Non- Voting) Pacifica Resource Center, Palmetto Ave. https://www.pacresourcecenter.org/ Pacifica School Volunteers BIER BECKMEYER Voting Member Meets Quarterly - Linda Mar Education Center http://psv.sanmateo.org/ Peninsula Clean Energy JPA BIGSTYCK BOLES Voting Member 4th Thurs 6:30 pm SMC Office of Education, 101 Twin Dolphin Drive, Redwood City, CA 94065 https://www.peninsulacleanenergy.com/
Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance (Commute.org) BOLES VATERLAUS Voting Member As Announced - quarterly 8am (2024 Board of Director Mtgs: 3rd Thursdays at 8am) https://commute.org/SMC JPA Advanced Life Support / Pre-Hospital Emergency BECKMEYER BOLES Voting Member Meets Quarterly(2022 mtg dates: Jan 2022 mtg cancelled; Wed. 5/18 at 6:30pm; Wed. 9/21 at 6:30pm) SMC Library JPA BIGSTYCK BECKMEYER Voting Member
1st Mon. in Feb., May, June, Sept., Nov.; 8:15am - Library Administration, 125 Lessingia Court, San Mateo https://smcl.org/jpa-governing-board/
* Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) BIGSTYCK NONE Voting Member
(term expiring May
2026)
3rd Wednesday odd # months, Redwood City
https://www.smcgov.org/lafcoSelected by the City Selection Committee. Tygarjas Bigstyck was appointed 1/10/2023 to the term expiring May 2026. * C/CAG Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee BIER Voting Member 4th Thurs. Alternate Months (Jan,Mar,May,Jul,Sept,Oct) 7pm www.ccag.ca.gov 2023 Pacifica City Council Liaison and Committee Assignments

14.a
Packet Pg. 224
Attachment: Attachment A: 2023 Council Liaison Assignments [Revision 1] (5552 : 2024 City Council AGENCY Council Representative(s) Council Alternate Role Meeting information ** Weblink * C/CAG Legislative Committee VATERLAUS Voting Member 2nd Thursday of the month www.ccag.ca.gov* C/CAG Resource Management & Climate Protection Committee (RMCP) BECKMEYER Voting Member 3rd Wednesday of the month (as needed) at 3:00 p.m., San Mateo at 155 Bovet Rd. or Redwood City at County Center www.ccag.ca.gov
* Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) - Regular Member Board of Directors BIER Voting Member
(term expiring
2/28/2025)
https://www.heartofsmc.org/Regular members of HEART are selected by the City Selection Committee. Councilmember Bier was appointed 1/10/2023 to the term expiring 2/28/2025. *LCC Coastal Cities Group (CCG) Leadership Committee, North Central Representative & Chair (through mm/dd/yyyy) BECKMEYER Voting Member As announced
https://www.calcities.org/get-involved/coastal-cities-groupThe Coastal Cities Group Leadership Committee consists of one elected official and their respective city manager, or their staff designee, from each of the six regions within the coastal zone. Sue Beckmeyer is the 2022 Vice Chair and represents North Central Coast region. Terms run annually and expire Dec. 31. Applications / selections occur annually. *San Mateo County Recovery Council VATERLAUS Advisory Member (County appointed) Monthly CITY OF PACIFICA COMMITTEES / COMMISSIONS:Beautification Advisory Committee BECKMEYER BIER Council Liaison to City Committee 1st Wednesday 6:30pm Public Works Corp. Yard https://www.cityofpacifica.org/government/commissions- committeesEconomic Development Committee BECKMEYER & BIER Council Liaison to City Committee 2nd Tues., 6pm at Pacifica Community Center https://www.cityofpacifica.org/government/commissions- committees Emergency Preparedness & Safety Comm. BOLES VATERLAUS Council Liaison to City Committee 3rd Wednesday 6:30pm Pacifica Police Station https://www.cityofpacifica.org/government/commissions- committees Library Advisory Committee BECKMEYER BOLES Council Liaison to City Committee 2nd Wednesday 6:30 p.m. Pacifica Librar(ies) https://www.cityofpacifica.org/government/commissions- committeesOpen Space Parkland Advisory Committee BIGSTYCK BECKMEYER Council Liaison to City Committee 3rd Wednesday 6 p.m. Pacifica Community Center https://www.cityofpacifica.org/government/commissions- committeesCity Council Ad Hoc Subcommittees:2023 Pride Planning Ad Hoc Subcommittee BIER & BECKMEYER N/A formed 12/12/2022; anticipated to be active through summer 2023Council Chambers Renovations Ad Hoc Subcommittee (informal) BIER & BECKMEYER N/A appointed at 3/14/2022 Council mtg; anticipated to be active through Spring 2023Beach Blvd Infrastructure Resiliency Project (BBIRP) Phase 2A Outreach Ad-Hoc Subcommittee BIER & BOLES N/A formed at 2/27/2023 Council mtg
Committee / Commission Charter Review Ad-Hoc Subcommittee BIER & BIGSTYCK N/A formed at 4/10/2023 Council mtg; in progressAbbreviations:

SMC: San Mateo County
Rev. 1-3-2024
* Representative selected by listed Agency not City CouncilABAG: Association of Bay Area Governments LCC: League of California CitiesC/CAG: City and County Association of Governments JPA: Joint Powers Authority** Meeting information for meetings of each body should be confirmed based on the published meeting agendas / agency website

14.a
Packet Pg. 225
Attachment: Attachment A: 2023 Council Liaison Assignments [Revision 1] (5552 : 2024 City Council Objectives / Weblink
https://abag.ca.gov/meetingsABAG is a voluntary membership and advisory organization with limited statutory authority. An elected official from each of the nine counties and 101 member cities and towns serves as a delegate to its General Assembly, which determines policy annually, adopts the annual budget and work program, and reviews the policy actions of ABAG's Executive Board. ABAG convenes its General Assembly once every year in April. Conference attendees include Bay Area elected officials, civic and business leaders, and researchers from leading academic institutions to identify and address land use planning, sustainability, and other policy issues that impact the entire region.which encourages local businesses to adopt sustainable methods to conserve resources.https://sforoundtable.org/A committee of elected officials that addresses community noise impacts from aircraft operations at San Francisco International Airport (SFO.)City of Pacifica CommitteeEngages public and civic groups to assist with city-owned sites in need of 'beautification', solicits sponsors for "Adopt a Median Strip" projects and implements annual 'Mayor's Beautification Awards Program' 2nd Thursday, 6:30 pm
SMC Transit District
www.ccag.ca.govCity/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County works on issues that affect the quality of life in general; transportation, air quality, stormwater runoff, airport/land use compatibility planning, hazardous waste, climate planning, energy and water resource strategies, and solid waste and recycling.https://www.smc-connect.org/locations/colma-creek-flood-control-zone-advisory-committee-of-san-mateocountyThe Colma Creek Citizens Advisory Committee is an advisory body to the Board of Directors of the San Mateo County Flood and Sea Level Rise Resiliency District (also known as OneShoreline for short). Pacifica, being in the Colma Creek watershed, appoints one member to the committee.The Colma Creek Flood Control Zone was created in 1964 to construct flood control facilities in Colma Creek to alleviate flooding in the City of South San Francisco. The nine members appointed by the Board of Supervisors, after nomination by the city councils of the Flood Control Zone, are required to be property owners within the zone (one each must be from the cities of South San Francisco, Daly City, San Bruno, Colma and Pacifica).City of Pacifica CommitteeThe EDC seeks to support the development of current local businesses and their interface with the City of Pacifica,improve aging business districts, and bring new businesses to Pacifica.

AGENCY Meeting information
ABAG General Assembly Delegate April, November meetings; 9am - 3pm Airport Community Roundtable 1st Wednesday 7:30 pm various locations Beautification Advisory Committee 1st Wednesday 6:30pm PB&R Conf. Rm.Colma Creek Flood Control Citizens Advisory Committee 2nd Tuesday of the Month (Quarterly)
3:00 PM - 5:00 PM
City of South San Francisco Corporation
Yard Conference Room
(Next Mtg: March 14, 2023)
C/CAG Representative
2023 City Council Liaison and Committee Descriptions and Meeting Information Economic Development Committee 2nd Tuesday, 6pm Pacifica Community Center - Portola Rm

Page 1 ends

Pacifica City CouncilJanuary 8, 2024

Pacifica City Council
January 8, 2024