Agenda packet — Pacifica City Council, March 24, 2025 (part 1 of 6)

CITY OF PACIFICA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Council Chambers
2212 Beach Blvd
Pacifica, CA 94044
Mayor Sue Beckmeyer
Mayor pro Tem Christine Boles
Councilmember Mary Bier
Councilmember Mayra Espinosa
Councilmember Greg Wright
City Council Regular Meeting 1 March 24, 2025
SPECIAL and REGULAR MEETING
March 24, 2025 (MONDAY)
www.cityofpacifica.org
Off-street parking is allowed by permit for attendance at official public meetings.

Vehicles parked without permits are subject to citation. You should obtain a permit from the rack in the lobby and place it on the dashboard of your vehicle in such a manner as is visible to law enforcement personnel.

PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES DURING MEETING
Alternative Ways to Observe and Participate in the Meeting:

The primary method for observing and participating in the meeting is in-person at the meeting location published in the meeting agenda. However, there are alternative ways to observe and participate:
• Join Zoom Webinar: https://pacifica-gov.zoom.us/j/81156158241 • Watch on TV on Comcast channel 26
• Watch a Live Stream of the meeting by following https://www.cityofpacifica.org/LiveStream or www.pacificcoast.tv
• Live Remote Public Comments (offered on a pilot basis):
• Join Zoom Webinar: https://pacifica-gov.zoom.us/j/81156158241 • OR Dial-in: 1-669-900-6833 | Webinar ID: 811 5615 8241 o Press * 9 to raise your hand to request to speak.
o Press * 6 to unmute when called upon to speak by the last 4-digits of your phone #. • When the Mayor announces the Agenda Item on which you would like to comment, raise your hand in Zoom. You will be called upon my screenname or last 4-digits of phone number if dialing in. Please mute any background sound and state your full name at the start of your comment.

Please note that Alternative platforms for participation are subject to underlying technology functionality and may be modified or interrupted at any time without notice. • Written Public Comments:

BEFORE THE MEETING: Written public comments may be submitted in advance by 12:00 p.m. on the meeting date by email to: [email protected]. Written public comments submitted by email should adhere to the following:
• Clearly indicate the Agenda Item No. or specify “Public Comment on Item Not on Agenda” in the Subject Line
• Include the submitter’s full name
Written public comments received by 12:00 p.m. on the meeting date will be provided in their entirety to the City Council and posted to the City’s website prior to the meeting but will not be read verbally at the meeting.

AT THE MEETING: Materials in writing provided at the meeting should provide seven (7) copies to provide for each Councilmember, City Clerk and City staff.

City Council Regular Meeting 2 March 24, 2025
5:00 PM - CLOSED SESSION
A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS - Government Code section 54957.6 - Agency designated representatives: Mark Wilson, Allison Hernandez of Burke, Williams, and Sorenson; Employee organizations: Fire Battalion Chiefs, IAFF Local 2400; Fire Fighters, IAFF Local 240; Management Unit, Teamsters Local 350 ; Miscellaneous Employee, Teamster Local 856; Pacifica Police Officers Association; Police Mgmt. & Police Supervisors; Wastewater Treatment Plant Teamsters Local 856 7:00 PM OPEN SESSION
Call to Order
Roll Call
Reading of Land Acknowledgment
The City of Pacifica acknowledges that we occupy the unceded ancestral homeland of the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples, who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco Peninsula. We honor the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples for their enduring commitment to Mother Earth. As the Indigenous protectors of this land and in accordance with their traditions, the Ramaytush Ohlone have never ceded, lost, nor forgotten their responsibilities as the caretakers of this place, as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. We affirm their sovereign rights as First Peoples and wish to pay our respects to the ancestors, elders, and relatives of the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples.

Salute to the Flag led by Mayor pro Tem Boles
Closed Session Report

CONSENT CALENDAR
Persons wishing to address the Council on any Consent Calendar item may do so at this time. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes. Those wishing to address the Council on any item listed on the agenda should submit a speaker card to the City Clerk.

Public meetings are a limited public forum, meaning that there are rules for commenting at these meetings. Comments on consent agenda items must relate to that specific item.

If comments do not relate to a specific agenda item, then City will provide you with an initial warning to stay on topic. If the warning is not followed, the Mayor will direct the City Clerk to cut off the microphone.

Items on the consent calendar will be adopted by one motion unless a Councilmember requests, before the vote on the motion, to have an item discussed. Time limit on comments is three minutes or less.

1. Approval of Minutes
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to approve the minutes for the February 24, 2025 Joint Study Session of the City Council and Climate Action & Adaptation Task Force and the City Council Regular Meeting 3 March 24, 2025
February 24, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting.

2. Adoption of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica approving the Montara Mountain-North Peak Communications License Agreement
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to adopt a Resolution approving the Montara MountainNorth Peak Communications License Agreement; finding the approval of the License Agreement categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301 (Class 1-Existing Facilities); and authorizing the City Manager to execute the License Agreement.

3. Authorize the Submittal of a Grant Application to the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways for the Beach Boulevard Infrastructure Resiliency Project PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt the resolution entitled "Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica Authorizing the Submittal of Grant Applications to the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways for the Beach Boulevard Infrastructure Resiliency Project.”

4. Award FY 2025-26 Pavement Resurfacing Project
PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt the Resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica Approving the Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Company in the amount of $1,586,657.90; Authorize a budget authority in the amount of $1,824,656.59, which includes contingencies in an amount not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the Construction Contract amounts; Authorize staff to Execute Future Change Orders not to exceed the contingency amount; and Authorize the City Manager to sign Contract Documents related to the FY 2025-26 Pavement Resurfacing Project.”

5. Adoption of Ordinance to Revise Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 Garbage Collections of the Pacifica Municipal Code
PROPOSED ACTION: Waive second reading and adopt by title only an Ordinance repealing and replacing sections 6-5.103, 6-5.104, and 6-5.105 of Chapter 5, “Garbage, Collection and Recycling” within Title 6, “Sanitation and Health” relating to the size of waste containers and frequency of collection.

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA
This portion of the Agenda is available for the public to address the City Council on any issue that is not on the Agenda. Any person wishing to address the Council shall be recognized by the Mayor during this time, provided, however, that only items not on the Agenda for that meeting may be addressed. Comments on non-agendized items must address matters within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City. If comments do not address matters within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City, the City will provide you with an initial warning to stay within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City. If the warning is not followed, the Mayor will direct the City Clerk to cut off the microphone.

Councilmembers shall not enter into debate with speakers under Public Comments on Items Not on the Posted Agenda. A maximum of three minutes will be allowed for any speaker.

City Council Regular Meeting 4 March 24, 2025

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
The purpose of Council Communications is for Councilmembers to inform each other of items of potential interest to other Councilmembers, such as interagency meetings.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
The purpose of Staff Communications is for the City Manager to offer announcements as appropriate.

PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE.

CONSIDERATION

6. Resolution approving the City’s 2024 Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the Housing Element of the General Plan and the 2024 Annual Progress Report on Implementation of Other Elements of the General Plan
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to adopt a Resolution approving the City’s 2024 Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the Housing Element of the General Plan and the 2024 Annual Progress Report on Implementation of Other Elements of the General Plan, and directing the City Manager to transmit the reports to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI).

7. General Plan Amendment GPA-106-24 for Adoption of the Revised 2023-2031 Housing Element of the General Plan (File No. 2023-025)
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to adopt the attached Resolution to:

1. Find the revisions consistent with the Initial Study/Negative Declaration for the 2023- 2031 Housing Element and that no subsequent environmental review is required; and

2. Approve the revised 2023-2031 Housing Element of the General Plan

8. Public Meeting to Receive Testimony Regarding Establishment of the '94 Business Improvement District (BID), the Pacifica Tourism Marketing District (PTMD) PROPOSED ACTION: Receive public testimony regarding the proposed establishment of the ’94 Business Improvement District (BID), the Pacifica Tourism Management District (PTMD).

9. Funding for the Temporary Safe Parking Program in Partnership with the Pacifica Resource Center
PROPOSED ACTION: Receive an update about the City of Pacifica and Pacifica Resource Center’s Temporary Safe Parking Program and consider extending Temporary Safe Parking Program and approving use of $204,000 from the City’s Housing Action Fund toward expansion and continuation of the program by renting and utilizing spaces in the San Francisco RV (SFRV) Resort in Pacifica.

10. Mid-year budget review and adoption of a resolution to adjust the Fiscal Year 2024-25 budget.

PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a resolution authorizing the mid-year FY 2024-25 City Council Regular Meeting 5 March 24, 2025
Operating and Capital Budget adjustments.

ADJOURN
NOTICE: If you challenge a city's zoning, planning or other decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Judicial review of any city administrative decision may be had only if a petition is filed with the court not later than the 90th day following the date upon which the decision becomes final. Judicial review of environmental determinations may be subject to a shorter time period for litigation, in certain cases 30 days following the date of the final decision The City of Pacifica will provide assistance for disabled citizens upon at least 24 hours advance notice to the City Manager’s Office (650) 738-7301, or send request via email to:
[email protected] if you need sign language assistance or written material printed in a larger font or taped, advance notice is necessary. All meeting rooms are accessible to the disabled.

The Pacifica Municipal Code is available online at the City’s website (www.cityofpacifica.org/municode);

HOW TO OBTAIN CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS
Posted agendas:

Agendas are posted no later than Friday prior to the City Council meeting date, at the entrance to the City Hall location at 170 Santa Maria Avenue, Pacifica.

View on the Internet:

Follow the link to Council agenda, at www.cityofpacifica.org E-mail subscription:

Send a request to Sarah Coffey, at [email protected] City Clerk’s Office/City Manager’s Office
City Hall, 170 Santa Maria Ave.

Council meetings:

Agendas are available at the City Council meeting

HOW TO REACH YOUR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
• San Mateo County Supervisor Ray Mueller, District 3, 500 County Center, Redwood City CA 94063 (650) 363-4569
• Governor Gavin Newsom, State Capitol Building, Sacramento CA 95814 (916) 445-2841 • State Senator Josh Becker, 1528 So. El Camino Real, Suite 303, San Mateo CA 94402 (650) 212-3313 • Assembly Member Marc Berman, 721 Colorado Ave, Suite 101, Palo Alto CA 94303 (650) 324-0224 • Congressman Sam Liccardo, 1117 Longworth House Office Building, Washington DC 20515 (202) 225-8104
• Senator Alex Padilla, 331 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington DC 20510 (202) 224-3553 • Senator Adam Schiff, SD-B40B Dirksen Senate Office Building, Washington DC 20510 (202) 224-3841 • President Donald J. Trump, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington DC 20500

CITY COUNCIL
• Mayor Sue Beckmeyer, [email protected]
• Mayor pro Tem Christine Boles, [email protected]
• Councilmember Mary Bier, [email protected]
• Councilmember Mayra Espinosa, [email protected]
• Councilmember Greg Wright, [email protected]

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/24/2025
1 SUBJECT:

Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Move to approve the minutes for the February 24, 2025 Joint Study Session of the City Council and Climate Action & Adaptation Task Force and the February 24, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting.

STAFF CONTACT:

Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
650-738-7307
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

Move to approve the minutes for the Move to approve the minutes for the February 24, 2025 Joint Study Session of the City Council and Climate Action & Adaptation Task Force (Attachment A) and the February 24, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting (Attachment B).

FISCAL IMPACT:

Within budgeted operational expenses.

ORIGINATED BY:

City Clerk
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment A: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Joint Study Session - City Council and CAAP Task Force (PDF)
Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (PDF) 1 Packet Pg. 6

CITY OF PACIFICA

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Council Chambers
2212 Beach Blvd
Pacifica, CA 94044
Mayor Sue Beckmeyer
Mayor pro Tem Christine Boles
Councilmember Mary Bier
Councilmember Mayra Espinosa
Councilmember Greg Wright
City Council Joint Study Session 1 February 24, 2025

JOINT STUDY SESSION

CITY COUNCIL AND CLIMATE ACTION & ADAPTATION TASK FORCE February 24, 2025 (MONDAY) – 5:00 PM
www.cityofpacifica.org
Mayor Sue Beckmeyer called the joint study session to order on February 24, 2025 at 5:04 PM 5:00 PM - JOINT STUDY SESSION CITY COUNCIL AND CLIMATE ACTION & ADAPTATION

TASK FORCE
Call to Order
Mayor Beckmeyer called the joint study session to order at 5:04 p.m.

Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Sue Beckmeyer Mayor Present
Christine Boles Mayor pro Tem Present
Mary Bier Councilmember Present
Mayra Espinosa Councilmember Present
Greg Wright Councilmember Present
City Clerk Coffey took a verbal roll call.

Staff Present: Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager; Denise Bazzano, Asst. City Attorney; Samantha Updegrave, Community Development Director; Elizabeth Brooks, Mgmt. Analyst; Brittany Hernandez, Program Manager; Sarah Coffey, City Clerk; Emily La, Dep. City Clerk.

CAAP members: Monica Meagher, Chair; Kai Martin, Vice Chair; Maria Barr; Kimberly Finale; Margo Meiman; Rick Nahass; Dave Plumb; Carl Schwab; Nancy Tierney.

Reading of Land Acknowledgment
Mayor Beckmeyer read the Land Acknowledgment.

Salute to the Flag led by Councilmember Espinosa

1.a
Packet Pg. 7
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Joint Study Session - City Council and CAAP Task Force (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Joint Study Session 2 February 24, 2025

CONSIDERATION

1. Receive an update and provide direction on the Draft Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
PROPOSED ACTION:

1. Receive an update on the Draft Climate Action and Adaptation Plan, and

2. Provide direction and feedback to Climate Action and Adaptation Plan Task Force members and staff for final draft preparation and future council consideration.

Monica Meagher, Chair of Climate Action & Adaptation Task Force, presented the report.

Mgmt. Analyst Brooks continued the presentation of the staff report. She concluded with two questions for Council to answer: 1) Can the City continue with the consultant? and 2) Does further prioritization of the actions seem appropriate to Council and, if so, does a three-tier framework work for Council?
Mayor pro Tem Boles asked about CAAP reviewing the past Climate Action Plan and its targets and asked if there were things the City did that were helpful.

Chair Meagher stated the switch to Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE) made the biggest impact, and some of the efficiency measures with the new Civic Center building had an impact.

Task Force Member Meiman reviewed E1.1 through E3.2 of the CAAP Draft.

Councilmember Bier asked if it was possible to combine E1.5, E1.6, and E1.7.

Task Force Member Meiman stated that E1.5 has to do with construction materials for new construction (but may consider retrofit), E1.6 is about new construction and new buildings, and E1.7 would be about people retrofitting their houses, so it may be possible.

Councilmember Wright asked, regarding E1.7, how CAAP addresses handling the challenge of fixed income seniors and high costs associated with changing heat pumps, and do we have the current infrastructure from a distribution perspective to handle this load.

Task Force Member Meiman stated programs from Peninsula Clean Energy have incomequalified programs, as well as high potential of additional funding from other sources. She stated, according to Peninsula Clean Energy’s rate of adoption, they will be able to match the grid with the electrification needed.

Councilmember Espinosa asked how much it would cost to change for electrification, and do they think the cost of electricity will go up or will it be similar to what people are paying for gas.

Task Force Member Meiman stated it is a tough question to answer regarding utility bills as both electricity prices and gas prices are changing all the time.

Mayor pro Tem Boles asked how each Action was prioritized.

Vice Chair Martin stated that all the time frames are best practices and may take a long time.

Mayor pro Tem Boles referred to E1.2 and asked that they explain the zoning change

1.a
Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Joint Study Session - City Council and CAAP Task Force (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Joint Study Session 3 February 24, 2025
requirement for where heat pumps can be placed.

Task Force Member Meiman stated that it comes from the Ideas Bank of Sustainable San Mateo County and it may be an area that could allow for easier permitting.

Vice Chair Martin stated the Task Force tried to consider what is feasible or not. Ultimately they envisioned the Environmental Commission working with City staff to figure out what is commercially, technologically, and operationally feasible.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated she would like to add encouraging people to do deep remodels.

Councilmember Wright asked, regarding E3 and gray water, what the Task Force thought about plumbing and landscaping for buildings to set up so there can be an easy connect to purple pipes.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated that we have some coordination with the Water District there.

Vice Chair Martin thought it would be a good thing to put that up for consideration.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated that, without the purple pipe, people can do laundry to landscape without permits and adding that as an educational item.

Task Force Member Schwab reviewed T1.1 through T4.2 of the CAAP Draft.

Mayor pro Tem Boles thought it would be helpful to break out the number of EV charging stations between private development and public.

Councilmember Wright asked about bike charging stations.

Task Force Member Schwab stated that is something they might be looking at more directly.

Councilmember Bier thought there were connections that can be made for future funding.

Councilmember Wright added connecting the coastal trail and I-35 and Skyline College. He also asked about carports and charging stations.

Task Force Member Schwab stated they planned to install 16 chargers across the Civic Center, utility yard, PW yard, and sewage treatment plant, which are mostly intended for City vehicles.

He also stated one of the goals in the T1 section encourages more bus routes, which would help justify the expense of putting in more frequent routes.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated the summary goal still says “reduce driving trips by 25% by 2030” instead of 32%. She thought “[S]” should be added to the “G” and “H” in T2.

Mayor pro Tem Boles was excited to see T1.1. She stated that figuring out our needs and what people will use could be part of that Transportation Demand Management Plan.

Task Force Member Nahass stated half the people in their surveys said transportation to BART is an issue and you have to have a plan in order to get funding. If we have a high-quality transit stop, it incentivizes developers and mitigates some CEQA requirements for developers.

1.a
Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Joint Study Session - City Council and CAAP Task Force (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Joint Study Session 4 February 24, 2025
Mayor pro Tem Boles stated it is important for greenhouse gas emissions, all the new housing we will build, and our tourist revenue.

Task Force Member Finale reviewed F1.1 through F2.5 of the CAAP Draft.

Mayor pro Tem Boles asked if there could be some incentives instead of requirements for F2.3, adding hiring local workers and thinking about decisions that may result in a lower price.

Task Force Member Finale stated a resource website could provide opportunity and selection of local work and materials. She added that there are multiple spaces in the Bay Area for buying materials that have come from other homes that have been dismantled.

Mayor pro Tem Boles added if there can be an education program with people doing remodels to look at deconstruction, which may be more expensive than demolition but offers tax credits.

Vice Chair Martin reviewed TR1.1 through T3.2 of the CAAP Draft.

Councilmember Wright asked for their thoughts on a potential commercial parking spot tree ordinance (e.g. for every 12 spaces, you need to have a tree), new construction and rainwater harvesting, cool roof efficiency standards, a study to make sure our rainfall or dew collection is sufficient through the year to support green roofs, and any public education for defensible space programs.

Vice Chair Martin stated that it depends on the species for green roof consideration, but it is limited. He added that in some cases, people use gray water to do their rainwater. He also stated that Allstate and USAA are offering educational programs regarding defensible space and fire protection / hardening, which would be part of a public outreach campaign.

Councilmember Wright stated we should have that in an informational resource for people. He also thought it would be nice to work with PG&E to underground our infrastructure.

Mayor pro Tem Boles added Thrive Rise may be a resource. She suggested looking at the library and Community Center as climate resilience centers.

Councilmember Bier stated her work with Tree City Pacifica has 30% tree canopy goal.

Vice Chair Martin stated, after consultation, 25% was more realistic for the tree canopy goal.

Councilmember Bier and Mayor pro Tem Boles added Sustainable San Mateo County has an app that helps with trees and prioritizing looking at canopies and disadvantaged communities.

Mayor pro Tem Boles added that she would like to include OSPAC in R2.10. She stated that, in some cases, it is not good to plant trees on landslide areas but especially not native.

Mayor Beckmeyer suggested “native stabilizing vegetation” instead of “shrubs and trees”.

Councilmember Wright asked what kind of resource our community has for selecting what kind of trees to grow to accomplish the tree canopy without interfering with some of our other goals.

Vice Chair Martin stated the City could put together a list of recommended species based on different parts of the City, which has been done in other cities.

1.a
Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Joint Study Session - City Council and CAAP Task Force (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Joint Study Session 5 February 24, 2025
Mayor pro Tem Boles stated he mentioned CAAP received the public comment from the Pacifica Land Trust about their grant.

Chair Meagher stated they are working with Pacifica Land Trust on updating language in one of these actions.

Mayor pro Tem Boles referred to the micro grids and stated one of Clean Energy’s goals is to continue working with them on neighborhood-based resiliency.

Task Force Members Tierney and Finale reviewed C1.1 through C3.5 of the CAAP Draft.

Mayor pro Tem Boles thinks the formation of the Environmental committee is important to see the work through. She asked for feedback from them on the CivicWell fellow and if it was possible that the staff person could be someone like that and then a smaller portion of time from City staff.

Mgmt. Analyst Brooks stated the CivicSpark Program was exemplary and affordable; between her and our CivicSpark fellow, it has allowed her as a paid full-time staff to feasibly support this.

Vice Chair Martin thought there were challenges with breaks in service and continuity. He thinks it is a great way to amplify what the City can do for a low cost, but it does not get rid of the need to have a dedicated resource, even if half-time.

Chair Meagher thought it could be a good option for setting up the Environmental Commission and there are grants out there that include money for staff time.

Mayor Beckmeyer noticed the items under C2 and C3 were repeated, which should be updated.

Councilmember Bier stated that in C2.2, there is an opportunity to regroup our Joint Articulation meeting with the School District and Water District; in C2.4, to work with Pacifica Resource Center (PRC) as well as Pacifica Gardens; and in C3.5, to work with Emergency Preparedness and Community Emergency Response Team (CERT).

Mayor pro Tem Boles suggested having more outreach and more youth in the schools involved.

Mayor Beckmeyer opened public comments.

Gail Benton Shoemaker, Pacifica, asked Council to support the Plan on behalf of Tree City Pacifica. She supported the 25% tree canopy goal and the four actions listed under canopy goal but asked not to move forward with the three-tier ranking of the Plan.

Suzanne Moore, Pacifica, supported the formation of the Environmental Commission and community input on the Plan. She also encouraged the City to work with the Ramaytush Ohlone people.

Sam Casillas, Pacifica, stated the Pacifica Land Trust had received a grant from the Coastal Conservancy to undertake the Pacifica Coastal Resiliency Opportunity Study. He recommended that the Study be integrated into the CAAP when completed by the end of 2025.

Sue Digre, Pacifica, appreciated the Plan including the opportunity for more public

1.a
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Joint Study Session - City Council and CAAP Task Force (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Joint Study Session 6 February 24, 2025
involvement, transportation improvements, and youth involvement.

Calvin Chan, Pacifica, Youth Advisory Board member and Youth Climate Action & Adaptation Task Force Chair, encouraged more youth participation and recommended the City partner with schools and youth organizations as outreach.

Dashiell Leeds, Pacifica, stated he is the Conservation Coordinator for the Sierra Club Loma Prieta chapter and stated that they support this Plan. He spoke in favor of the Environmental Commission, Youth Environmental Commission, Sustainability Coordinator, nature-based solutions, and tree canopy goal.

Cindy Abbott, Pacifica, spoke in favor of their recommendations, including the Environmental Commission. She stated that three-tier ranking may not need further focus at this time.

Mayor Beckmeyer closed public comment.

Councilmember Wright asked what is the best way to contact the CAAP Task Force.

Mgmt. Analyst Brooks shared information on the CAAP Task Force’s meetings and website.

Mayor pro Tem Boles is in favor of the committee and staffing, depending on funding. She agreed with some of the public comments that we do not need to prioritize things now.

Councilmember Espinosa stated she will be working hard on electrification, clean energy, and community outreach, as we can do all of this together.

Councilmember Bier thinks there should be a commission and favored youth involvement.

Mayor Beckmeyer echoed Council’s appreciation.

City Manager Woodhouse stated we need clear direction from the majority of Council regarding the two questions: 1) Should the City proceed with securing consultant support to complete the CAAP report? and 2) Given the volume and breadth of priority actions in the CAAP, does Council want to offer some framework and refinement and prioritization of them before the report comes back to Council for final adoption? He stated what is not being considered at this meeting is direction about formation of a commission, additional staff position, etc., which need to be considered in the context of the entire City’s budget development process deliberation.

Mayor Beckmeyer understood and asked for the CAAP Task Force’s feedback.

Chair Meagher stated they are asking Rincon to go beyond what they are providing for the rest of the County and there might be an additional cost for that regarding finalizing the CAAP Draft.

The Task Force is aligned with the City on the recommendation to obtain that assistance.

Mayor pro Tem Boles asked the City Manager if there is some money left over from the discussion of how much we are estimating for the RICAP.

Mgmt. Analyst Brooks stated that we do not have a finalized scope of work that we can review with Rincon yet but we are estimating that it will be within the City Manager’s spending authority.

There was Council consensus to support continuing with the contractor and not moving forward

1.a
Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Joint Study Session - City Council and CAAP Task Force (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Joint Study Session 7 February 24, 2025
with the tiered approach.

RESULT: NO VOTE REQUIRED

ADJOURN
Mayor Beckmeyer adjourned the joint study session at 7:12 p.m.

Transcribed by Barbara Medina, Public Meeting Stenographer.

Respectfully Submitted,
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
__________________________
Sue Beckmeyer, Mayor

1.a
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Joint Study Session - City Council and CAAP Task Force (5890 : Approval of Minutes)

CITY OF PACIFICA

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
February 24, 2025 (MONDAY) – 7:00 PM
www.cityofpacifica.org
Mayor Sue Beckmeyer called the meeting to order on February 24, 2025 at 7:30 PM 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING - OPEN SESSION
Call to Order
Mayor Beckmeyer reconvened the regular meeting at 7:30 p.m.

Staff Present: Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager; Denise Bazzano, Asst. City Attorney; Yulia Carter, Asst. City Manager (Zoom); Maria Sarasua, Police Chief; Scott Leslie, PB&R Director; Samantha Updegrave, Community Development Director; Marisol Gómez, Finance & Administrative Services Director; Louis Sun, Interim PW Director; Roland Yip, PW Dep. Director (Field Services/Engineering); Daniel Patten, Wastewater Engineering Manager; Sarah Coffey, City Clerk; Emily La, Dep. City Clerk.

Reading of Land Acknowledgment
Mayor Beckmeyer read the Land Acknowledgment.

Salute to the Flag led by Councilmember Espinosa

CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Beckmeyer asked Council and staff to move Council and Staff Communications to the end of the meeting.

Mayor pro Tem Boles asked the City Manager to announce Strategic Planning meeting details

1.b
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 2 February 24, 2025
and give an approximate time for public comments for that all-day session.

Mayor Beckmeyer asked if any Councilmembers wished to pull any items from Consent. Seeing none, she opened public comments for the Consent Calendar. There were no public comments.

Councilmember Bier moved to approve the consent calendar; seconded by Mayor pro Tem Boles.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
SECONDER: Christine Boles, Mayor pro Tem
AYES: Beckmeyer, Boles, Bier, Espinosa, Wright

1. 2024 Mandated Fire and Life Safety Inspections Compliance Report PROPOSED ACTION: Receive and acknowledge the 2024 Mandated Fire and Life Safety Inspections Compliance Report of the North County Fire Authority’s mandated fire and life safety inspections performed within the City of Pacifica pursuant to Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 of the Health and Safety Code.

2. Notice of Completion for the FY 2024-25 Resurfacing Project PROPOSED ACTION: Move to Adopt the Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica accepting completion and directing the City Manager to file Notice of Completion for the FY 2024-25 Resurfacing Project; and authorize the City Manager to release the retention funds to the contractor.

3. Primary Grant Agreement with the San Mateo County Transportation Authority for future Measures A and W Funding
PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt the resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica Authorizing Execution of a Primary Grant Agreement with the San Mateo County Transportation Authority for future Measures A and W Funding.”

4. Resolution Authorizing Master Agreement for Consultant Services and Task Order No. 1 with Hazen and Sawyer for Engineering Design Services for the Headworks Rehabilitation and Improvement Project (P040)
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to Approve a Resolution Authorizing a Master Agreement for Consultant Services and Task Order No. 1 with Hazen and Sawyer for engineering design services in the amount of $1,346,500 for the Headworks Rehabilitation and Repair Project (P040); Approve budget authority in the amount of $1,548,475 which includes 15% contingency in the amount of $201,975; and Authorize the City Manager to execute all documents related to the project; and Authorize the City Manager to execute all documents related to the project.

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA
Aren Clark, Pacifica, mentioned the increase in trees on the hills and there being an increase in fire hazards. He asked about a plan to protect the open space and address the fire hazards.

Dan Stegink, Pacifica, contacted elected officials regarding instating an anti-bribery ordinance in response to one of his appeals to a Pacifica development and stated Sheriff Christina Corpus was one of two respondents who would push for it. He explained that he opposed the Measure

1.b
Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 3 February 24, 2025
A, which would allow the Board of Supervisors to remove her.

Amanda Kraft, Pacifica, stated they are present on behalf of a situation at the Seacliff Apartments on Palmetto Avenue regarding discrimination and illegal evictions, and she requested that the City have a dialogue and work out the situation with Code Enforcement.

Frankie Burton, San Francisco, shared her concerns about the illegal, racist, classist, and inhumane activities at Seacliff Apartments and requested that the City communicate with the advocates regarding this issue and help the community against discriminatory practices.

Natalie Hopner, Pacifica, stated she lives in Seacliff Apartments and highlighted the concerns on the predatory practices in the complex for the residents especially on subsidies and asked Council to address the issue as well as accountability.

Ken Miles, Pacifica, shared his concerns on possible wildfires in Pacifica and suggested options to mitigate the situation. He warned of the likelihood of a burnt out community.

Joaquin Jiminez, Half Moon Bay, shared his concerns about Measure A taking away our power to vote and opposed the Measure A, which would allow the Board of Supervisors to remove Sheriff Christina Corpus.

Andromeda Garcelon, San Mateo County, shared her concerns and thoughts on the issues at Seacliff Apartments. She asked the City Council to enforce tenant and renter laws in response to the predatory and retaliatory practices done by management.

Jen Hansen, Pacifica, shared a quote (“Quiet women rarely make history”) and she thinks of Sheriff Corpus when she hears about Measure A. She then expressed concerns about fire safety and encouraged a defensible space ordinance.

Erin Macias, Pacifica, spoke of the RVs coming from San Francisco and emphasized the transition of the existing homeless population into housing stability and not accepting other cities’. She also spoke on concerns regarding fire safety issues with possible strategies regarding defensible space to address it.

Mark Macias, Pacifica, stated he is a retired Fire Department Lieutenant and asked if there has been any progress made on defensible space issues on Crespi, Alma Heights, etc. He also expressed concern about the homeless panhandlers on the Linda Mar Mall exit and asked why the law is not being enforced.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Woodhouse stated the Strategic Planning meeting would take place on March 1 regarding the annual Strategic Plan Update Workshop with City Council, facilitated by Greg Larson. It will occur in the City Council Chambers and in-person only. The published agenda specified that public comment will not occur earlier than 10:15 am. The day is expected to run into the afternoon, perhaps to 4:00 p.m.

1.b
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 4 February 24, 2025

PUBLIC HEARINGS

5. Public Hearing on a proposed ordinance repealing and replacing Article 49 of Title 9, Chapter 4 of the City of the Pacifica Municipal Code (“Short-Term Rentals”); making certain amendments to Article 29 of Title 9, Chapter 4, Section 9-4.2904 (“Exempted Signs”) of the Pacifica Municipal Code; and finding the adoption of the Ordinance exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

PROPOSED ACTION: Conduct a public hearing and introduce an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Pacifica repealing and replacing Article 49 of Title 9, Chapter 4 of the City of the Pacifica Municipal Code (“Short-Term Rentals”); amending Article 29 of Title 9, Chapter 4, Section 9-4.2904 (“Exempted Signs”) of the Pacifica Municipal Code; and finding adoption of the Ordinance exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Community Development Director Samantha Updegrave presented the staff report.

City Manager Woodhouse stated that Asst. City Manager Carter is on Zoom and there are HdL consultants Alex Terrazas and Bret Harmon on Zoom.

Mayor Beckmeyer asked if Council had any questions.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated there were 139 compliant STRs now and asked for a rough number of how many are non-compliant. She also heard that staff is recommending against platform accountability and would like to understand how that is working out in more detail, where it is well, and where we are having trouble with enforcement, how helpful it is, etc. She is trying to understand how valuable that is and if we have been able to reduce the number of noncompliant with their help.

Community Development Director Updegrave stated, according to HdL records, there are 8 non-compliant STRs in the coastal areas and 6 in the non-coastal for a total of 14.

Mayor pro Tem Boles asked what date that is from.

Asst. City Manager Carter stated that the latest data from HdL was from Quarter 2, ending December 31, 2024.

City Manager Woodhouse stated he will start on platform accountability. He stated that the compliance work that the City has been doing is mostly through HdL as our monitor to make sure we have all the appropriate permits, so the platforms are not helpful in that compliance.

Previously the City had worked over years to develop the relationship with AirBnB in terms of putting permit numbers on sites. Once we started this process, Airbnb was less responsive to our dialogue. They are still responding and we are working on that relationship and hope to continue to encourage that.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated, as indicated in the staff report, staff is not recommending including provisions about platform accountability. There are practical and legal limitations on what the City can do in terms of holding platforms accountable. In terms of practical limitations, some of the platforms are located in Europe, as well as United States. Holding a platform that is located in Europe accountable would be extremely difficult for the City. In terms of legal limitations in the United States, the City would be limited or preempted from imposing certain regulations under the Communications Decency Act, which generally regulates the content

1.b
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 5 February 24, 2025
users post on the website. She stated, as indicated in the staff report, staff’s recommended focus is on operators and responsible persons that are located locally that are more practical and achievable in terms of enforcement.

Mayor pro Tem Boles asked about staff’s reasoning for the language around the ADUs in allowing someone living in their ADU to rent their house as a full-time unhosted STR. She understands that STRs cannot be an ADU by State law but what are we hoping to achieve.

Community Development Director Updegrave stated that it was a clarification as, under state law, the presence of an ADU cannot change the nature of the residential use. If you have a single-family house with an ADU, you cannot regulate that ADU like a duplex or a multi-family unit so the residential status of the unit itself is unaffected. What that provision does is that it clarifies and reiterates that ADUs cannot be used as the STR, but the property owner or tenant is not required to reside in the primary residence.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated it seems like a specific allowance of use of the home as what is a full time “hosted” with someone on the site but no one in the building.

Community Development Director Updegrave does not believe it allows something that is not already allowed but, in making the distinction between hosted and unhosted, that clarification becomes necessary.

City Manager Woodhouse stated that his recollection is that Council discussed this issue in the December hearing and there were comments made about the situation where that might benefit someone to live in their ADU and rent out their house as a hosted. Staff did not receive direction differently from Council on that.

Mayor Beckmeyer recalled a Council majority indicating they did not favor that practice.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated that is her recollection also. She understood that the Planning Commission had other suggestions for not requiring one parking space per bedroom in the noncoastal zone but she has not heard why they thought that was important.

Community Development Director Updegrave stated her recollection was, because the recommendation had come from the Coastal Commission, the requirement for one parking space per legally rented STR bedroom related more directly to the parking needs within the coastal zone; and outside of the coastal zone, the parking demands would not be quite as high.

Thus, it was to allow existing residential dwellings to also use STR and keeping the parking requirements potentially lower and more in line with the residential zoning parking standards.

Mayor Beckmeyer referred to “detrimental impact to traffic” and asked what it means.

Community Development Director Updegrave stated it is one of the operational requirements in Section 9-4.4905.

Councilmember Espinosa referred to inspections and stated the owner-occupied STR does not need the home inspection. She stated that we do not know what the house looks like; if the owner lives in the house, it does not mean that the house has the requirements like smoke detectors or a carbon monoxide detector and other issues that should be checked out.

Community Development Director Updegrave stated that, in the ordinance, for the hosted STRs,

1.b
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 6 February 24, 2025
the operator would be required to self-certify that those things are present.

Councilmember Espinosa asked if they have to do it themselves or hire somebody.

Community Development Director Updegrave stated it is a self-certification so they would sign an attestation as part of the application.

Councilmember Espinosa asked if they would say they have the smoke detectors and they will certify themselves.

Community Development Director Updegrave stated it is a self-certification, subject to all of the applications.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated “detrimental” was in Section 9-4.4908: “permit revocation can occur when the STR is operated in a manner detrimental to the public health welfare or safety or constitutes a nuisance”.

Mayor Beckmeyer asked what detrimental impact to traffic means.

Community Development Director Updegrave stated that it is in section 9-4.905(g): “not create pedestrian, automobile or truck traffic detrimental to property in the vicinity or neighborhood parking impacts. The property address shall be clearly marked.” Mayor Beckmeyer opened the public hearing.

Suzanne Moore, Pacifica, spoke in support of limiting unhosted STRs to 60 nights, having a local operator available to respond to incidents within 30 minutes, stating that the maximum two violations are within a 12-month period and may result in revocation, clarifying that hosted rentals have hosts residing in the property during the rental, removing the provision allowing STR operators to live in their ADU, requiring inspection of all STRs, and investigating platform accountability, if useful.

Sophia Chang, Pacifica, stated she was present as a resident and STR host, and she shared her thoughts in support of STRs and its benefits to Pacifica. She agreed with tighter enforcement but stressed that the funds generated from STRs are essential for public services.

Stephanie Robbins, Pacifica, spoke in support of limiting unhosted STRs to 60 nights, implementing platform accountability, and maintaining the same parking standards for coastal and non-coastal areas in Pacifica.

Patrick Beatty, Pacifica, shared his experience with problematic STRs and thought the fiscal impact in the staff report was very limited. He also spoke in support of inspections of all STRs.

Don Creasman, Pacifica, stated he has been a host for eight years with no complaints and emphasized the difference between hosted and unhosted STRs. He asked that Council keep the difference in mind while crafting the ordinance.

Margaret Coles, Pacifica, stated she was representing the Seaside Merchants Association and shared their position on this issue. She stated it may be advantageous to have a carve-out area for STRs, emphasized how weekend visitors generated business and tax revenue, and encouraged a more nuanced look at how STRs are regulated.

1.b
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 7 February 24, 2025
Jen Hansen, Pacifica, emphasized the need for platform accountability, submitting listings with STR applications, local responsible parties, limiting unhosted STRs to 60 nights, inspections of all STRs, defining non-commercial events, and requiring fire ladders for multi-story buildings.

Andy Meiman, Pacifica, spoke in support of limiting unhosted STRs to 60 nights and implementing platform accountability. He asked Council to be skeptical of the fiscal impact in the staff report.

Dian Emerson, Pacifica, spoke in support of limiting unhosted STRs to 60 nights and keeping one parking space per bedroom per STR in all of Pacifica. She described issues with no limit on children under 12 years old in STRs.

Bryan Reinero, Pacifica, expressed concern with the fact that STR operators can remain in an ADU while renting out their main property and spoke in support of platform accountability.

Gary Furlong, Pacifica, expressed concerns with the fiscal impact in the staff report, including statistics about parking, renting for 60 days vs. 90 days, and multi-family rentals.

Gary Chinca, Pacifica, spoke in favor of maintaining the same parking standards for coastal and non-coastal areas in Pacifica, inspections of all STRs, and a maximum occupancy on children. He also would like an expedited timeline for implementation.

Rebecca Smith-Coggins, Pacifica, spoke in support of limiting unhosted STRs to 60 nights, inspections of all STRs, a maximum occupancy on children, and viewing violations within a 24- month period.

Danny Estrella, Pacifica, stated that long-term residents that make up the rich culture of the community and expressed concerns about STRs taking up housing availability for potential residents. He opposed STRs in a residential neighborhood and especially unhosted STRs.

Bob O’Donnell, Pacifica, described the consequences of the original STR ordinance and stated improvements needed to be made to the new ordinance, such as limiting unhosted STRs to 60 nights, an expedited timeline for implementation, and inspections for all STRs.

Leo Leon, Pacifica, spoke in favor of inspections for all STRs, removing the provision allowing STR operators to live in their ADU, and emphasized the importance of the health, safety, and welfare of the people.

Lyla Reinero, Pacifica, spoke in favor of platform accountability and described the multitude of issues she has experienced with the STR on their neighborhood with both guests and the operator. She stated she would like to see families reside in the STRs like they used to.

Kathy Moresco, Pacifica, asked for Council to look into converting STRs that come off the market to become housing. She also stated that some STRs only rent out through the summer and then are vacant for the rest of the year.

Joanne Gold, Pacifica, spoke in support of limiting unhosted STRs to 60 nights, removing the provision allowing STR operators to live in their ADU, and implementing platform accountability.

Albert Zhang, Pacifica, spoke in opposition to the nightly cap, primary residence requirement,

1.b
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 8 February 24, 2025
and public QR code requirement and stated they were economically damaging and unfair to responsible STR operators. He also described ways STRs benefit Pacifica’s economy.

Connie Menefee, Pacifica, described the multitude of issues she has experienced with the STR on their neighborhood and asked Council to strengthen the ordinance. She spoke in favor of increasing the permit, violation, and inspection fees and building more hotels in Pacifica.

Alan Hyland, Pacifica, shared the positive experiences he has had as an STR operator and described ways STRs benefit Pacifica’s economy. He emphasized the need for weeding out the bad actors.

Abselam, Pacifica, emphasized the need for weeding out the bad actors and stated building restrictions and code have restricted the housing availability more than STRs. He stated that restricting STRs will not solve the problem of housing availability and affordability.

Russell Jones, Pacifica, emphasized the need for weeding out the bad actors and stated the draft ordinance revisions were economically damaging and unfair to responsible STR operators.

He emphasized the need to focus on addressing problematic STRs and to maintain the economic benefit of STRs generally.

Mark Stechbart, Pacifica, spoke in support of limiting unhosted STRs to 60 nights, a maximum occupancy on children, parking enforcement, making calls for service and other data available online, implementing platform accountability, and an oversight committee for STRs.

Kimberly Finale, Pacifica, shared her concerns for STRs causing a shortage of homes. She spoke in support of limiting unhosted STRs to 60 nights, having a local operator available to respond to incidents within 30 minutes, removing the provision allowing STR operators to live in their ADU, inspections for all STRs, and enforcement with platform accountability.

Caitlin Quinn, Pacifica, spoke in support of limiting unhosted STRs to 60 nights, clarifying that hosted rentals have hosts residing in the property during the rental, implementing platform accountability, and an expedited timeline for implementation for certain provisions.

Arlene Zhao, Pacifica, stated that enforcement of the ordinance is the issue with the four problematic properties and that the majority of compliant STRs should not be penalized for their conduct. She also spoke in favor of the economic benefit of STRs generally.

Alex Vardekostas, Pacifica, stated STRs make up 1% of the housing stock so removing or restricting STRs may not lead to significant changes in school enrollment and rental prices. He stated STRs may not return under this ordinance and that others were in support of Half Moon Bay’s ordinance but it allowed for STRs in commercial zones. He emphasized the need for weeding out the bad actors and spoke in favor of the economic benefit of STRs generally.

Cindy Abbott, Pacifica, emphasized that Pacifica is a community and spoke in favor of maintaining the same parking standards for coastal and non-coastal areas in Pacifica, implementing platform accountability, removing the provision allowing STR operators to live in their ADU, and having a local operator available to respond to incidents within 30 minutes.

Elda Kong, Pacifica, stated there are four problematic properties and that the majority of STRs are compliant. She encouraged Council to redefine “hosted” STR operator to include being reachable by phone within 10 minutes, being available at the property within 30 minutes, and

1.b
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 9 February 24, 2025
providing contact information to the neighbors and the City. She also raised privacy concerns and opposed the QR code and primary residence requirement.

Tor Neilands, Pacifica, described the health and safety issues experienced with the STR on their neighborhood. He preferred removing all unhosted STRs but spoke in support of limiting unhosted STRs to 60 nights and having a local operator available to respond to incidents within 30 minutes.

Jessica Lu, Pacifica, shared the positive experiences she has had as an STR operator and described ways STRs benefit Pacifica’s economy. She emphasized the need to focus on addressing problematic STRs and for stricter regulations.

Sam Casillas, Pacifica, stated that he considers unhosted STRs as hotels operating in residential units and were impacting the housing stock and school enrollment and closures.

Erin Macias, Pacifica, spoke in favor of implementing platform accountability, limiting unhosted STRs to 60 nights, and removing the provision allowing STR operators to live in their ADU.

Mayor Beckmeyer closed the public hearing. She called for a break and then reconvened the meeting.

Councilmember Bier referred to inspections and the number of children.

Mayor pro Tem Boles suggested Council make clear when there is consensus on each issue.

Councilmember Wright asked about what inspections besides smoke and C02 detectors.

Councilmember Espinosa stated for the property.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated that there could be a lot of things that they inspect. The draft ordinance has inspections for unhosted but the question is inspections for hosted. She stated that the point of an inspection is catching anything illegal that they might not see.

Councilmember Wright mentioned numbers of bedrooms and egress windows.

Mayor pro Tem Boles mentioned having egress windows, rooms that are bedrooms or have heat, basic building codes, and life safety issues. She thought pools and spas should be inspected as well.

Councilmember Wright stated he would concur with the pools.

Mayor pro Tem Boles agreed, adding smoke detectors, fire extinguishers, etc.

Councilmember Wright asked if fire extinguishers required for residential properties.

Mayor pro Tem Boles it is a requirement in part of their application for businesses like this. She thinks the City will work out what the list is for what is inspected, but the question is if we are requiring inspections for both hosted and unhosted.

Mayor Beckmeyer added how is it paid for.

1.b
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 10 February 24, 2025
Mayor pro Tem Boles thought the applicant should pay and reimburse the City for the cost.

Councilmember Bier agreed.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated she does not understand where that happens.

Councilmember Wright stated he would need to know exactly what they are inspecting before he can decide whether he is in favor of inspections or not.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated that we have a list of things, i.e. fire extinguishers, windows, pools and spas, heat, legal bedrooms, and beds in hallways.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated she has seen some that have bedrooms that open off a garage and that is a building code violation.

Councilmember Wright asked about hotels needing two means of egress.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated that hotels do but houses do not.

Councilmember Wright stated that is why it gets tricky.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated she is hearing inspections for life safety issues, inspections on all STRs, and the applicant pays the cost for the inspection.

City Manager Woodhouse stated in the current ordinance drafted for unhosted STRs there is a scope for the inspection. He stated that staff can read that and Council can decide to expand or take that same scope and apply it to hosted STRs.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated that it is section 9-4.4904(d), inspection of unhosted STRs.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated packet pages 18 and 62. She stated that pools and heat were not included in the inspections currently.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated that heat and light are basic building code requirements and bedrooms cannot open off of a garage or a room with a water heater.

Councilmember Espinosa mentioned windows in bedrooms.

Mayor pro Tem Boles thinks that is part of a legally permitted bedroom, but compliant windows have to be of a certain size.

Councilmember Wright mentioned lighted ingress and egress.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano asked if a majority of Council agrees with those additions.

There was Council consensus to see the language to make the final decision.

City Manager Woodhouse stated, for process, any substantive changes to the ordinance will need to go back to the Planning Commission and it will be a while before it gets back to Council for review and adoption.

1.b
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 11 February 24, 2025
Councilmember Wright asked, regarding the process, what signifies a significant change and would this change necessitate going back to the Planning Commission.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano answered affirmatively, stating that anytime Council changes the ordinance to something not contemplated or discussed by the Planning Commission, that would be a substantive change.

Councilmember Wright asked if it was possible to pass the ordinance as it is written and instruct staff to amend the ordinance that has been passed to include this.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated that Council would not adopt anything at this meeting, only introducing the ordinance. If Council wants to make changes, they can make changes prior to introduction that have been considered by the Planning Commission in areas that are nonsubstantive changes, but for substantive changes it has to go back to the Planning Commission before it is introduced.

Councilmember Wright asked whether we can do both at the same time or does it need to be re-agendized. He was concerned about the waiting period for the ordinance to go into effect.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated we need to discuss the waiting period.

Councilmember Wright preferred that the operator to be able to show up within 30 minutes.

Mayor Beckmeyer asked about the designated responsible party.

Councilmember Wright stated that somebody needs to be able to show up within 30 minutes.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated someone local.

Councilmember Wright agreed. He then asked the City Manager if the license fee covers all the costs for processing those applications.

City Manager Woodhouse stated no. He stated that the license fee helps cover the cost, as the program costs more to administer than what the fees are.

Councilmember Wright asked if we are allowed to raise the license fee or is there a cap on how much the license fee can be.

City Manager Woodhouse stated that Council could consider that when we bring back the fee schedule during budget and make adjustments to what the permit fees cost at that time.

Councilmember Wright asked for the total amount of TOT revenue generated solely by STRs.

Asst. City Manager Carter stated that, in the past in the last two years, STRs generated approximately $1.3 million to $1.5 million in TOT only. She stated to keep in mind that, in November, Pacifica voters voted for Measure M, raising TOT to 15%. If we were talking about increase for the upcoming year, not considering the changes in the ordinance, we would be looking at roughly $1.8 million to $1.9 million in TOT generated solely by STRs.

Councilmember Wright asked for the cost for administrating the STR permits and regulations.

1.b
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 12 February 24, 2025
City Manager Woodhouse stated the overall cost of administering the program is not something that we have calculated. Over the last couple of years, it would be much higher than we would hope on a normal basis. He stated that there were some public comments made about HdL getting paid several hundred thousand dollars, but that might be a number that relates to all the services that HdL provides to the City, including property tax, sales tax, cannabis audits, business tax administration, other audits as well as TOT compliance and STR audits; thus, the STR component is a very small piece of that.

Councilmember Wright asked if he had any estimate.

City Manager Woodhouse stated we would have to run those numbers. Staff have been having conversations with HdL about what future costs would be to administer this complex program as it would go up significantly.

Councilmember Wright thought he saw a number like $100,000 increase in that cost.

Asst. City Manager Carter stated that we do not have a hard cost yet, as we just started communications with HdL about what those new provisions would be.

Councilmember Wright thought estimated revenue from STRs are $1.8 million, subtracting the $1.4 million we would be potentially losing and the increased cost from HdL of $100,000, not to mention staff time and money lost on the revenue on processing the applications, etc. He thought the actual benefit to the city is minuscule compared to the amount of staff time put in to this and amount of time Council put into it. He is questioning the reasonableness of even trying to do an STR policy. He asked what the real benefit is to the City of having STRs at all.

Councilmember Espinosa added what people are going through.

Councilmember Wright asked staff about whether this policy gives Police sufficient ammunition to enforce this if there are problems as Code Enforcement does not work 24 hours a day.

City Manager Woodhouse stated that there are different enforcement mechanisms and processes involved in this program, such as compliance with tax aspects, business licenses, and permitting. Code Enforcement enforces property matters, and Police enforces public safety matters. He stated that the enforcement provisions in this ordinance will help but enforcement will always be complicated and difficult for private property matters, whether STR or other Code Enforcement matters. He stated that this ordinance, as drafted, helps with the enforcement means. The amount of fines that would be applied would hopefully be an incentive to bring a non-compliant operator into compliance but it will be a learning curve.

Councilmember Wright knows when some multi-unit buildings in the City have a fire alarm event SFFD sends a bill to the property owner for their response. He wondered if it would be possible to have the same ability for fining the STR operator for the cost of the Police response.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated that we currently have that type of recovery process through the loud and unruly gatherings ordinance but that is specifically allowed by State law. Typically, fines for violations are set by the State for general law cities, such as Pacifica, and fines are very specific in what can be charged. Typically, we would try to recoup the cost related to the Code Enforcement action, but that is dependent upon the City succeeding in the Code Enforcement action and being able to recover the cost of enforcement; thus, it is not easy to receive that recovery back.

1.b
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 13 February 24, 2025
Councilmember Wright asked if it was more work than it is worth.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano thinks it depends on the case. For some cases, it is vital to recover what the City has lost. In other cases, there may not be much recovery because the person may not have funds or there is no property at issue that we can lien and it would not be worth the City’s time in most of those instances to try to recover those costs.

Councilmember Wright asked if we can see any benefit on the application to have them sign that it is okay for the sites to share information with us and that we reserve the right to amend our ordinance on 30 days’ notice.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated the fact that the host or operator signs that type of agreement would not necessarily bind the platforms to anything; that does not obligate the platform to share anything, even though the operator has signed that document. In addition, the City does not have a signed document from an applicant to say the City can change its ordinance. She stated that Council, in its discretion, may legislate as it sees fit. She stated that the question is whether or not the applicant would be able to raise legal arguments about the applicability of those new ordinances, and she did not think we could have that person sign away any legal arguments that they could make in the future.

Councilmember Wright referred to the signage, and there was some concern that, in the event there was a disruption, neighbors might feel awkward about walking up to get that signage. He asked about mailing that same QR code to neighbors within 500 feet.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated that Council can include some type of notice provision to adjacent neighbors, although it can be something other than a QR code that indicated that an STR will be conducted at that location.

Councilmember Wright asked how much time has staff dedicated to dealing with the STR issue, both in support of STR operators and our citizens.

City Manager Woodhouse does not have an hour estimate on that, but these last two years it has occupied a significant amount of time in the City Manager’s Office, Finance Department, Planning Department (including Code Enforcement and planners), the Police Department, and the City Attorney’s Office.

Councilmember Wright asked for the reason for the 90-day cap as opposed to the 60-day cap.

City Manager Woodhouse stated that Council discussed the cap and decided 90 days.

Councilmember Wright asked staff why the implementation is slower and why we cannot offer relief sooner.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated staff have tried to come up with timelines that would fit within the City’s permit process but also reasonably address the requirements of the ordinance. She stated that we cannot control the Coastal Commission’s certification of the ordinance in the coastal zone; it is dependent on when the City submits the application for the amendment and when they are able to schedule it and make a determination.

Councilmember Wright asked the City Manager of any unintended impacts related to this or the

1.b
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 14 February 24, 2025
lost revenue piece or what potential other decisions this would affect.

City Manager Woodhouse stated the fiscal impact is very real. He stated it is his responsibility as the City Manager to present Council with what the budget realistically will be and what the fiscal impact of program decisions will be and, in August 2024, he presented the same analysis.

Staff did more detail and came out with a similar number now, based on much more facts about what we know, given the ordinance that Council has directed. He stated that the fiscal impact is real and when we enter into budget development this year, we will be building in a $500,000 deficit for the next fiscal year related to TOT revenue directly. He stated that he cannot speak specifically to the policy implications of that as it will depend on how Council prioritizes where and how the budget should be balanced.

Councilmember Wright asked if this ordinance will protect good operators.

City Manager Woodhouse thinks we heard comments from operators that this ordinance will put good operators out of business in Pacifica and there might be other good operators that then can operate but he cannot answer that question directly.

Councilmember Wright asked how soon are we entitled to amend it once we see unforeseen, unintended consequences.

City Manager Woodhouse stated that Council can amend an ordinance whenever they would like. What would be administratively challenging is if we have an ordinance application pending to the Coastal Commission and then Council amends it in that intervening year or however long the Coastal Commission would take.

Councilmember Wright asked how quickly Coastal Commission may respond to these changes.

City Manager Woodhouse stated, from the December report, it is not unusual for Coastal Commission to take at least a year to review this kind of an LCP ordinance amendment.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated that Councilmember Bier mentioned talking about inspections and children and she would like to address the issue of tonight’s meeting closure time. She prefers 11:00 p.m. but they may want to discuss at a continued meeting on this topic.

Mayor pro Tem Boles thinks there are changes that will be needed to this ordinance. She asked if it would be helpful to staff to stay longer and give an idea of some of the issues that Council wants to revisit or should we reschedule it for another meeting as it is already late.

City Manager Woodhouse thought it would be more time-efficient to get all Council’s direction about what additional staff work or research would be necessary to come back if there was staff work to be done for those particular issues. Otherwise, this conversation would continue, and staff would need to do the work on the revisions to the ordinance and take it to the Planning Commission before it comes back to Council if it were ready at that point. In terms of timing, he was not sure if we have agenda capacity in either of the March meetings to take this up.

Mayor pro Tem Boles asked if we could have a special meeting.

City Manager Woodhouse agreed that we could have a special meeting, but those are very difficult to schedule.

1.b
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 15 February 24, 2025
Councilmember Espinosa asked if we can name what we are supposed to discuss.

Councilmember Bier agreed.

Councilmember Bier moved to extend the meeting to 11:30 p.m.; seconded by Mayor pro Tem Boles.

EXTEND MEETING TO 11:30 PM
RESULT: ADOPTED [4-1]
MOVER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
SECONDER: Christine Boles, Mayor pro Tem
AYES: Beckmeyer, Boles, Bier, Espinosa
NOES: Wright
Councilmember Bier suggested talking about the parking first. She thought that parking should be the same in both zones.

There was Council consensus for the coastal zone and non-coastal zone to have one off-street parking space per legal bedroom.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated that is also what Council directed previously. She stated that there has been discussion about platform accountability, which will save us money and enforcement because, if a unit does not have a City permit, they should take it off of their platforms and this applies to all platforms. She stated that the City Attorney gave Council language from the City of Santa Monica ordinance and she likes all of them. She thought that is something Council can talk about next time. Included in the Santa Monica ordinance is hosting platforms shall be responsible for collecting all applicable TOTs.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated that our transient occupancy tax code requires the operator to collect the tax and she did not think that specific provision will work but there are other provisions in City of Santa Monica’s ordinance that may be agreeable to Council.

Mayor pro Tem Boles also read from the City of Santa Monica ordinance that, “subject to applicable laws, hosting platform shall disclose to the city on a regular basis, each homesharing and vacation rental listing located in the city, the names of the persons responsible for such listing, the address, the length of stay for each such listing, and the price paid per stay”.

She concluded we could get reporting on a regular basis so platforms can confirm who is staying, how much is rented, etc. and that will help us with our hosted versus unhosted.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated that the language “vacation rentals” is not a term that we have identified in our ordinance.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano anticipated the language would have to be massaged to conform to our current ordinance.

Mayor pro Tem Boles continued, “Hosting platforms shall not complete any booking transactions for any residential property or unit unless it is listed on the City’s registry at the time the hosting platform receives a fee for the booking transaction.” She stated, to the point about the law, we are not controlling the content of what they are putting on their website, but the way they do transactions. She stated that it is helping them take illegal properties off of their website.

1.b
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 16 February 24, 2025
Mayor Beckmeyer asked if the list of our permitted STRs constitute a registry.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated that we would need to massage it to conform but the City would essentially have to create a registry that could be cross-checked by a platform.

Mayor pro Tem Boles added from the City of Santa Monica ordinance “shall not collect or receive a fee, directly or indirectly during agent or intermediary for facilitating or providing services ancillary to the vacation rental, including insurance, concierge service, catering restaurant bookings,” etc. She mentioned safe harbor as well.

Mayor Beckmeyer asked if it says anything about a field where they put the permit number.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated that it does not. She stated that City of Santa Monica’s ordinance is somewhat similar to the City and County San Francisco’s ordinance.

Mayor Beckmeyer was unsure how we compel the platform to do that if we do not say anything about it.

Mayor pro Tem Boles thinks that is the question, i.e., whether asking them to make that information available constitutes asking them to make content on their website. She stated it is a verification of a number, not content. She stated that it is easy for them and then it is always in the same place.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated the City of Santa Monica’s provisions were reviewed by a court and upheld; thus, if Council would like to direct the City Attorney’s Office to massage those provisions and include them, that can be a change that can be made.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated that one thing that is not on there and is in the City and County of San Francisco’s are fines. She asked if we can fine them if we find that they are advertising something that does not have our permit number.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano responded affirmatively.

Mayor pro Tem Boles would like that to be considered too.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated that they become subject to the ordinance and the fines are not necessarily the larger STR fines as those deal with public safety but other general fines.

Mayor Beckmeyer asked about the number of nights.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated that she suggested 90 and the majority of Council at the time suggested 60 and former Councilmember Sue Vaterlaus was questioning whether we should have limits at all so 90 days was a compromise. She stated, when she was thinking 90, she was thinking someone taking a summer break and going on sabbatical and renting their home for that amount of time. She did not think about it in terms of 45 weekends of people visiting.

She thought there was some difference in revenue generation to the City but she is okay going to 60 if that is still what Council desires.

Councilmember Bier stated she was having a hard time with it.

1.b
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 17 February 24, 2025
Mayor pro Tem Boles stated we can revisit that if she wants to.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated put it on the list of things we want to talk about when we come back.

She stated that the issue of a natural person came up multiple times and, on packet page 52, we talk about defining a responsible party as a natural person over the age of 18. She stated that somewhere else in the ordinance we define a person as a corporation, LLC, etc. She thinks that was because it was the definition of the owner versus the operator.

Community Development Director Updegrave stated that the Planning Commission recommended adding “natural person” for the designation of the responsible party. That is also in the red line copy of the ordinance.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated that there is another place in the definition section.

Community Development Director Updegrave asked definition of “person”.

Mayor Beckmeyer read, “Operator means a person who has applied for a short term rental” and “Person means natural person, corporation business trust, estate trust, partnership limited liability company, association or other entities”.

Councilmember Bier stated that there has been language which says “require that STR operators must all prove primary residency, be natural persons, not corporations, Trust, LLCs , estates and partnerships”.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated that the responsible party change from “person” to “natural person” was by the Planning Commission, and she understood that the Planning Commission felt it needed to be a natural person as there was an obligation where someone would need to respond personally to a complaint through phone call or in person. She added that the definition of person includes corporate entities and other business entities and those types of entities can be an operator.

Councilmember Bier thought we did not want that.

Mayor pro Tem Boles agreed, stating that is what we were trying to avoid.

Councilmember Bier stated that we do not want big corporations coming in.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated that operator means the person who applied for the short-term rental permit and then we define person as a corporation. She stated that the operator could be the corporation.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano responded affirmatively.

Councilmember Wright asked how the operator or corporation could live there.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated it was discussed in the primary residence section, i.e. an allowance for how a corporate entity can establish that it is a primary residence. She explained that there are entities that hold properties. She stated that is allowed in California. She stated that it is very common to have a trust or LLC hold a property. That is something that will happen in the ownership of property and we have provided a way that the officers of the corporate entity or partners can establish the residence as a primary residency.

1.b
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 18 February 24, 2025
Mayor pro Tem Boles thinks we need to bring this back one more time. She stated that we may need a definition of natural person separately. She stated that Marin County has one where they define a natural person as a human being, and the term natural person does not include legal entities of any kind. She knows corporations have certain rights but are they natural persons and do they count for the person who has to respond and do they count for ownership and have to count for operator.

Councilmember Bier agreed, adding the difference between ownership and operators.

Councilmember Espinosa thought the operator is the person who will be taking the phone call, not necessarily the owner.

Councilmember Bier agreed, adding the natural person.

Councilmember Espinosa stated that person might be a local and we want them to be a local person.

Councilmember Wright stated not just taking a phone call but wanting them to show up.

Councilmember Espinosa agreed if they have to.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated that the way the definitions are linked to each other is that a person who takes the phone call and the person who shows up in 30 minutes. It also says it means the person who has applied for the short-term rental. She stated that the next line down is the definition of a person is not a human being but potentially a corporation. She stated that we have to work on that. She likes what Mayor pro Tem Boles said about the Marin County definition and perhaps there is a way for us to add clarity.

Councilmember Bier agreed so there is a difference between an owner and an operator.

Councilmember Espinosa stated, if the company does not live here, they can hire someone to be the operator.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated that it is supposed to be a primary residence.

Mayor Beckmeyer agreed, stating that is the issue.

Mayor pro Tem Boles thinks we need to come back as it is complicated. She stated that was always our intention to not have corporations who own multiple ones. She also had a concern with the ADU policy.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano asked if we have direction from the majority of Council to add a definition of natural person or does Council want to do something different.

Councilmember Wright thought Council wanted to bring it back and discuss it more later.

Councilmember Espinosa stated that giving the definition is important.

Councilmember Bier added like not including an LLC as an operator.

1.b
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 19 February 24, 2025
Councilmember Wright agreed that an operator has to be a natural person but owner did not.

Mayor Beckmeyer asked, if Council gives a more specific definition to natural person, how do we define and relate that person or the operator to the residency.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated that the ordinance currently does not define owner. It regulates a person who operates a short-term rental and a person can be a corporate entity.

The operator has to show proof of primary residency and, if not the owner of the property, they have to show permission by the owner. The owner may not factor into the STR operation.

Mayor Beckmeyer referred to Councilmember Espinosa saying they can hire someone.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano agreed.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated the reason she is concerned about this is because it feels like there is opportunity for a loophole. She wants to figure out how to tighten our definition.

Councilmember Espinosa stated that, if we are going to have un-hosted, we would like them to hire an operator who is local and someone can call them and show up in 30 minutes.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano heard that there is a desire to have the operator morphed into the responsible party obligation. Right now we have an operator who can operate an STR but sometimes that operator is not going to be available and a responsible party is also required to be designated; the responsible party has to be available when the STR is in operation and an operator is not available. She stated that it sounds like Council wants just one obligation for the operator to be constantly available.

Mayor pro Tem Boles does not think that is realistic.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated that is why the responsible party was created, as there could be situations where the operator is unavailable and the responsible party is a fall back.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated that we still do not like the corporate language for being able to apply for STRs and having seen it stated so clearly that they are allowed is troubling.

Mayor Beckmeyer agreed. However, because corporations and trusts own property, we cannot legislate that away, regardless of our definition.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated Council gets to decide how they want to legislate. She stated that Council ultimately gets to make the decisions and she will make recommendations as the City Attorney and the City Manager can make recommendations.

Mayor Beckmeyer understands and stated she wants to look at the Marin County definition, but not at this time. She would like to look at that definition in terms of how it relates or does not to our section 9-4.4901 (j).

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated section 9-4.4903 (c) that talks about how primary residency needs to be shown if the person is a corporation, business trust, etc.; the managing member of the company, the officer, the corporation, the trustee, etc., would have to have the site as their primary residency.

1.b
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 20 February 24, 2025
Mayor pro Tem Boles would like to remove the ADU option, where someone can live in their ADU and rent out their house. She stated that it encourages people to buy properties with ADUs and not necessarily live there but rent out the house all year long as it counts as hosted.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated that, the way it is defined here, it does, but she does not consider that as hosted; her intent of hosted STR is that you are within the four walls of the building that is being rented out on a short-term basis. If you are in the ADU in the backyard, you are not in the same structure. She stated that, when Director Updegrave brought that forward, she thought something about how the ADU law is defined is where this came from. She stated that we did not ask for it, but it is clarifying that.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated that, otherwise, we banned STRs in ADUs. She was not sure what we were gaining by having this particular language.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated that the real question is do we need it and are we required under the state ADU law.

Community Development Director Updegrave thought that is how we will have to implement it.

Anytime we can be clear about what is allowed, particularly around ADUs, it benefits the public, decision makers, and people implementing it. She stated that the concern is that we cannot add additional restrictions to the residential use based on the presence of an ADU.

Mayor Beckmeyer thought that would be helpful. She stated on looking at the ordinance, we have not made a “whereas” clause about the impacts to residential neighborhood character resulting from the operation of lodging businesses in areas zoned for residential uses. She stated that we have talked about the benefits we can provide but have not talked about the problems they can create. Since this ordinance is becoming so restrictive, it feels that we need to have “whereas” clauses that explain why it needs to be restricted.

Councilmember Bier agreed.

She then referred to packet page 59, item 0: “Single-family dwelling unit means a building designated for or used to house not more than one family, including all necessary employees of such family. Single family attached homes are not included in this definition.” She asked if this is a townhome or a condo and why that was inserted.

Community Development Director Updegrave stated the Planning Commission added that in conjunction with the previous page under line F. Within the zoning ordinance itself, multi-family development is defined currently as 3 or more units so it does not include attached single-family homes. Within the STR ordinance, the direction was to regulate 2 or more for the purposes of STRs only as multi-family dwellings or multi-family development. The Planning Commission wanted to add the example of including duplex, triplex and attached units, inclusive of attached single family dwellings. Because they made that change there, they also made the change under the single-family definition so that they match. She stated that these differ from the definition of multi-family and single-family that are applicable in the rest of the zoning ordinance or other provisions.

Councilmember Espinosa stated that a complex with four units can be considered single-family.

If more, it would be multi-family.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated that it is townhomes or condos.

1.b
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 21 February 24, 2025
Councilmember Espinosa thought that condos and townhomes are multi-family. She is talking about a four-plex.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated that we decided that condos and townhouses were single-family even though they are connected.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated that clarifies it.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated that we can talk about children under 12.

Councilmember Wright mentioned two per adult.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated two children per adult.

Councilmember Espinosa wanted to say 3 children per adult.

Councilmember Espinosa stated two adults and three kids.

Councilmember Wright asked for how many bedrooms.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated that each unit can have eight adults. She stated you have to think about the number of two people per bedroom and she thinks you have to think about the totals and not just a family with a certain number of members.

Community Development Director Updegrave thinks there should be care taken to not be regulating family size. There have been State law changes about what constitutes family and a household in the last two years to help prevent discrimination against different family types.

Mayor Beckmeyer stated we need to put it on our list and come back to the number of children.

Councilmember Espinosa stated that it could be a health and safety issue to have too many people in one room.

Mayor pro Tem Boles agreed that we need to talk about it some more.

Mayor Beckmeyer agreed to put that on our list to talk about at our next meeting which is a date uncertain at this point.

Mayor pro Tem Boles added a continuation so we can continue on the business and not necessarily have to take public comment again.

Mayor Beckmeyer agreed that was her understanding.

City Clerk Coffey added to make sure to get Asst. City Attorney Bazzano’s input on that because of the changes to the ordinance of this magnitude that are being considered.

Mayor pro Tem Boles stated that we are not necessarily bringing back a draft ordinance.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated that we are going to continue the hearing to a date uncertain. Council has conducted the public comment portion of the hearing so Council can

1.b
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 22 February 24, 2025
continue deliberations at that meeting. It is always within the Council’s discretion to make a different decision but Council has taken public comment on this particular public hearing and that would not need to be done at that meeting. They need to continue it to a date uncertain.

Mayor Beckmeyer also wanted to acknowledge the passing of Luigi who was so meaningful for so many families, including her family. She hopes we will have an opportunity to have a fuller discussion and appropriate acknowledgement, but she would like to adjourn the meeting in his honor and memory.

Mayor Beckmeyer moved to continue the public hearing to a date uncertain; seconded by Councilmember Bier.

CONTINUE MEETING TO A DATE UNCERTAIN
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Sue Beckmeyer, Mayor
SECONDER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
AYES: Beckmeyer, Boles, Bier, Espinosa, Wright
CONSIDERATION – NONE.

ADJOURN
Mayor Beckmeyer adjourned the meeting at 11:29 p.m. in memory of Luigi.

Transcribed by Barbara Medina, Public Meeting Stenographer.

Respectfully Submitted,
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
__________________________
Sue Beckmeyer, Mayor

1.b
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 2-24-2025 Regular City Council Meeting (5890 : Approval of Minutes)

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/24/2025
1 SUBJECT:

Adoption of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica approving the Montara Mountain-North Peak Communications License Agreement
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Move to adopt a Resolution approving the Montara Mountain-North Peak Communications License Agreement; finding the approval of the License Agreement categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301 (Class 1-Existing Facilities); and authorizing the City Manager to execute the License Agreement.

STAFF CONTACT:

Bill Glasgo, Police Captain
650-738-7314
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The City and County of San Francisco (San Francisco), through the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC), issued a San Francisco Water Department Revocable Permit dated April 23, 1963 (“Permit”) to the County of San Mateo, as permittee, to erect and maintain a radio communications antenna facility and appurtenant equipment shelter on approximately 40,000 square feet of San Francisco-owned property located on the North Peak of Montara Mountain in unincorporated San Mateo County (Assessor’s Parcel Number 093-030-050).

The County eventually erected two communication towers on the site which have become known as the East Tower and the West Tower.

In 2009, the United States of America, acting by and through a duly authorized official of the Department of the Interior, National Park Service ("NPS"), Golden Gate National Recreation Area ("GGNRA") constructed and maintains at GGNRA’s cost and expense a new radio communication tower replacing one of the County’s prior towers with a new 80-foot antennae tower. This new 80-foot tower is jointly operated by the County and GGNRA and is referred to as the West Tower. The County also operates its own 40-foot tower on the site called the East Tower.

In June 2022, San Francisco and the County replaced the Permit issued in 1963 with a new Lease (the “Master Lease”) to provide more comprehensive terms and conditions reflecting the current use of the site.

There are currently nine (9) sub-users of the site, a group comprised of a variety of local and state public agencies. These agencies use the site for telecommunications that provide critical health and safety services to the public.
2 Packet Pg. 36
Pacifica City Council 2
March 24, 2025
The terms of the Master Lease require the County to replace any existing agreements with the sub-users of the site with new Communications Site License Agreements (“License Agreements”), and to enter into new License Agreements with any sub-users who to date have had no formal written agreement with the County for use of the site.

The City of Pacifica Police Department was one of three agencies that previously had no formal written agreement to use the site. The proposed License Agreement between the City of Pacifica and County of San Mateo formally establishes in writing the terms and conditions for the Pacifica Police Department to use the site.

The proposed License Agreement provides for the Police Department’s use of a portion of the premises consisting of the following: (a) approximately four (4) square feet of space in the equipment shelter for a portion of one (1) radio equipment rack, and (b) space on the 80-foot tower for one (1) antenna.

The proposed License Agreement specifies that the County will not charge any rent, permit fee, license fee or use fee to the City for use the space. However, the City must reimburse the County for the actual pro rata cost of the utilities used by the City. These actual costs would include any operational, maintenance and road access (including road repairs and access fees) required to operate the County’s communications facility and which benefit the City.

The proposed License Agreement specifies the improvements that the City can make to the area that is licensed to the City and requires compliance with the terms of the Master Lease Agreement and certain special terms imposed by the City and County of San Francisco (See Exhibit 3 to the License Agreement), including limitations on bottled drinking water and tobacco sales and advertising at the site. The proposed License Agreement would also require the City to maintain certain insurance at all times the License is in effect as well as defend and indemnify the County and the SFPUC from and against all claims, demands, etc., in connection with the License Agreement and the City’s use of the County’s facilities.

Once entered into, the City may terminate the License Agreement at any time by providing 90 days’ written notice to the County.

The City Manager is seeking City Council authorization to execute a License Agreement with San Mateo County for the license of a portion of the Montara Mountain communications site.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

Do not enter into the License Agreement. However, this would create significant challenges for the communications needs of the Police Department.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The approval of the License Agreement is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301(Class 1) because the City will only licensing space in, or on, an existing communications facility which will involve only negligible expansion of use.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

Strategic Plan Goal 1: “Enhance organizational and fiscal stability”. 2 Packet Pg. 37
Pacifica City Council 3
March 24, 2025
FISCAL IMPACT:

No direct fiscal Impact for approving the License Agreement but the City might be required to pay a pro-rata cost, which is expected to be minimum to low because of our share and use.

Initial estimates would likely be between $6000 and $12,000.

ORIGINATED BY:

Police
ATTACHMENT LIST:

North Peak Communications License Agreement (PDF)
2 Packet Pg. 38
Pacifica City Council 4
March 24, 2025
RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA APPROVING THE MONTARA MOUNTAIN-NORTH PEAK COMMUNICATIONS LICENSE AGREEMENT;

FINDING THE APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE AGREEMENT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT

FROM REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15301(CLASS 1-EXISTING FACILITIES);

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE LICENSE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City and County of San Francisco, acting through its Public Utilities Commission (“SFPUC”), owns a portion of land in unincorporated San Mateo County more commonly known as Montara Mountain; and
WHEREAS, the SFPUC entered into a lease with San Mateo County on June 1, 2022 for approximately 40,000 square feet of property to allow the County to install and maintain a communications site for the transmission and reception of radio communication signals (Master Lease Agreement); and
WHEREAS, the City of Pacifica Police Department would like to use the County’s communications facilities for its own communications needs, specifically to improve transmissions over Police radio; and
WHEREAS, the master lease requires the County to enter into a sublicense agreement with each of the sub-users of the site based on a specific template approved by the County and the SFPUC.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PACIFICA CITY COUNCIL HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Council hereby finds that approval of the License Agreement is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301(Class 1) because the City will only licensing space in, or on, an existing communications facility which will involve only negligible expansion of use.

2. The City Council hereby approves the License Agreement between the City of Pacifica and the County of San Mateo, attached hereto.

3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the License Agreement in the form attached hereto, with minor amendments which may be approved by the City Attorney. • • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 24th day of March 2025, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
2 Packet Pg. 39
Pacifica City Council 5
March 24, 2025
_________________________________
Sue Beckmeyer, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ _________________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 2 Packet Pg. 40

Page 1 ends

MONTARA MOUNTAIN – NORTH PEAK

COMMUNICATIONS SITE LICENSE
COUNTY AGREEMENT REF NO. 5412

PACIFICA POLICE DEPARTMENT AGREEMENT
This LICENSE (the “License”) is dated for reference purposes as of January 1, 2025, and is by and between the COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, a political subdivision of the State of California (“County” or “Licensor”), and the CITY OF PACIFICA, a municipal corporation (“Licensee”). County and Licensee sometimes collectively are referred to in this License as the “Parties” or singularly as a “Party.”

RECITALS
A. The City and County of San Francisco, a municipal corporation (“City” or “Landlord”), acting by and through its Public Utilities Commission (“SFPUC”), owns a portion of Assessor’s Parcel No. 093-030-050 located in City’s Peninsula Watershed and more commonly known as Montara Mountain – North Peak, in unincorporated San Mateo County, California, including all appurtenances and improvements erected or placed on such parcel (“Property”).

The Property is described in and/or shown on Exhibit A to the Lease (defined in Recital B below) and is under the jurisdiction of City’s SFPUC.

B. City, as landlord, and County, as tenant, entered into that certain Communications Site Lease (SFPUC L4507), dated as of June 1, 2022 (as amended or modified, the “Lease”), for the lease of an approximately 40,000 square foot portion of the Property (also known as SFPUC Parcel No. 31) (“Premises”). A copy of the Lease has been provided to Licensee by County. The Premises is more particularly described on Exhibit B to the Lease. Exhibit B to the Lease depicting the County’s leased Premises is reshown for convenience and attached as Exhibit 1 to this License.

C. County uses the Premises for the installation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and operation of a communications site for the transmission and reception of radio communication signals.

D. Licensee engages in communications operations and desires to use and license a portion of the Premises from County for communications activities consistent with the Permitted Use described in the Lease.

E. County and Licensee now desire to enter into this License on the terms and conditions set forth more particularly below.

F. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this License shall have the respective meanings given in the Lease.

2.a
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 2 ends

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, County and Licensee agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. License and Term

1.1. License and Use. County hereby confers upon Licensee a revocable, personal, non-exclusive privilege to enter upon the Property and use a portion of the Premises consisting of the following: (a) approximately four (4) square feet of space in the vault (also called the “shelter” or “shed” herein) for a portion of one (1) radio equipment rack (shared with the Fire JPA), as shown on the attached Exhibit 2 (the “Vault Layout Floor Plan”), (b) space on the 80-foot tower for one (1) antenna (as shown on Exhibit 5 as Antenna No. 12), and (c) space for “Permitted Improvements” as defined hereinbelow (such portions of the Premises collectively referred to as the “License Area”), for the limited purpose and subject to the terms, conditions, and restrictions set forth below. This License gives Licensee a license only and, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this License, this License does not constitute a grant of any ownership, leasehold, easement, or other property interest or estate whatsoever in the License Area or the Premises, or any portion of the Property.

1.2. Term. The term of this License (“Term”) shall commence on January 1, 2025 (“Commencement Date”), and shall automatically end on the earliest to occur of the following: (i) ninety (90) days after written notice to terminate by either Party to the other Party pursuant to Section 9 of this License; (ii) eight (8) years after the Commencement Date (“Expiration Date”); or (iii) the expiration or termination of the Lease. Notwithstanding the foregoing: (1) Licensee may request to renew the License upon a ninety (90) day written notice prior to the expiration of any then-current term if the term of the Lease between City and County has been extended; and (2) Licensee may hold possession of the License Area with County’s written consent pursuant to Section 1.4, Holding Over.

1.3. No Right of Renewal. This License shall automatically terminate without any residual rights of renewal at the end of the Term, or sooner as set forth in Section 9 below and Section 1.2 above. Notwithstanding the forgoing, (1) if the term of the Lease between City and County has been extended, County and Licensee may extend the Term of this License by mutual written agreement; and (2) Licensee may hold possession of the License Area with County’s written consent pursuant to Section 1.4, Holding Over.

1.4. Holding Over. In the event that Licensee, with County’s written consent, holds possession of the License Area or any portion thereof after the date upon which the License Area is to be surrendered, Licensee’s use and occupancy will continue from month-to-month, at will, until terminated by County or Licensee pursuant to Section 9, Termination, Default, and Remedies. Nothing in this Section

1.4, Holding Over, is to be construed as consent by City or County to the

2.a
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 3 ends

occupancy or possession of the Premises by Licensee after the expiration of the term or any extension thereof.

1.5. Permitted Use. Licensee shall use the License Area only for the installation, construction, removal, replacement, maintenance, and operation of a wireless communication site utilizing the existing and the proposed rack, radio, and antenna equipment as shown on the attached Exhibit 5 (“Equipment”), and the Permitted Improvements shown in Exhibit 4.

Licensee acknowledges that, subject to Section 3.5 (Equipment Conflict) but otherwise without affecting the rights and obligations of the Parties under this License, County may, in its sole discretion, grant to other operators the right to install and use similar facilities in the Premises.

1.6. Limits on Use of License Area and Other City Property. (a) Limited to Use of License Area. Licensee acknowledges that the privilege given under this License is limited strictly to the License Area and the Premises and grants Licensee no rights to cross over or otherwise use any adjoining or other lands of City except as expressly provided in this License. (b) County Use and SFPUC Access. Licensee's rights and
activities under this License are subordinate at all times to the SFPUC's existing and future use of the License Area for utility facilities, or any other purpose. (c) Entry by Licensee.
(i) Licensee shall give ten (10) days prior written notice to County prior to the commencement of Licensee’s installation and construction of its Permitted Improvements (defined in Section 3.3 (Permitted Improvements and Equipment) below). Thereafter, Licensee has the right to enter the License Area at any time without prior notice being given to County for the installation, construction, maintenance, and operation of Licensee’s existing communications facilities. The modification of or addition to Licensee’s existing communications facilities shall be done in accordance with Section

3.4. Alterations and Additions.
(ii) Licensee agrees to coordinate all entry to the License Area through the County’s Radio Services Division in the County’s Information Services Department at (650) 363-4442 during normal business hours, or after-hours through the County’s Public Safety Dispatch at (650) 363-4915.
(d) Entry By County.
(i) Non-Emergency Entry. County reserves the right to
enter the License Area at any and all reasonable times to inspect the same, supply any services to be provided by County to Licensee under this License, to show the License Area to any prospective purchasers or licensees, to post notices of non-responsibility, and to alter, improve, repair, or restore the License Area as County may deem necessary or desirable, without abatement of permit fee, so

2.a
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 4 ends

long as County does not unreasonably interfere with Licensee’s operations. For each of the above purposes, County shall at all times have and retain a key with which to unlock all of the gates and/or doors in, upon, and about the License Area, excluding Licensee’s vaults, cabinets, safes, and files. County’s right to enter the License Area is subject to: (1) County having given not less than twenty-four (24) hours prior notice to Licensee, and (2) an employee or agent of Licensee being present during each and any entry to the License Area.
(e) Emergency Entry. Notwithstanding the provisions of
Section 1.6(d)(i), Non-Emergency Entry, above, in the event of an emergency, County shall have the right to use any and all means that County deems proper to gain entry to the License Area without liability to County except for any failure to exercise due care for Licensee’s property. Any entry to the License Area obtained by County by any such means, or otherwise, shall not under any circumstances be construed or deemed to be a forcible or unlawful entry into, or a detainer of, the License Area, or an eviction of Licensee from the License Area or any portion thereof.

2. Fees and Expenses

2.1. No License Fee. County shall not charge any rent, permit fee, license fee, or use fee to Licensee.

2.2. Reimbursement For County’s Operational Expenses.
(a) Reimbursement Payment. County may charge Licensee for the actual pro rata cost of the utilities used by Licensee. For the purposes of the foregoing sentence, the “actual cost” of such “utilities” shall be the actual operational, maintenance, and access expenses (including, but not limited to, American Tower Company road access fees and road repairs) required to operate the County’s communications facility on the Premises and that benefit Licensee; and the actual cost of any improvements approved by City and installed by County for the benefit of Licensee on the Premises. All payments for such costs (“Reimbursement Payment”) shall be delivered to County at the following address, or such other address as County shall designate in writing to Licensee:

Information Services Department
Accounts Receivable (Ref. No. 5412)
455 County Center, 3rd Floor
Redwood City, CA 94063
(b) Prorated Reimbursement Payment. The Reimbursement
Payment and all other fees and charges for any period during the Term of this License which is for less than one (1) full calendar month shall be prorated based upon the actual number of days of that calendar month. The Reimbursement Payment and all sums payable under this License must be paid in lawful money of the United States of America.

2.a
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 5 ends

2.3. Payment Terms and Late Fees.
(a) Payment Terms. Licensee shall pay the Reimbursement Payment as provided in Section 2.2 above.
(b) Late Fees. If any sum due from Licensee shall not be received by County within thirty (30) days after such amount shall be due, County may charge a late charge of Fifty Dollars ($50) and interest at a rate of five percent (5%) accruing monthly on the balance from the time incurred until fully paid.

Acceptance of such late charge by County neither constitutes a waiver of Licensee's default with respect to such overdue amount, nor prevents County from exercising any of the other rights and remedies available to County.

3. Operation and Maintenance of License Area

3.1. County Responsibilities. County shall supply both commercial power and emergency power for operation of the Equipment on the same basis as County uses for County’s equipment. In lieu of rent, Licensee shall reimburse County for Licensee’s pro-rata share of power and utilities pursuant to Section 2.2, (Reimbursement for Operational Expenses).

3.2. Licensee’s Responsibilities.
(a) Maintenance. Licensee shall maintain the License Area in good conditions and repair, and shall take care to prevent waste or damage to the License Area or the Premises. Licensee shall care for the License Area by properly overseeing all operations and by maintaining the License Area and surrounding areas in good condition, order and repair, free from unsightly accumulations of waste or odors, trash, debris, weeds, unused equipment, and fire hazards.

Licensee shall comply with any written policies County or City may adopt and deliver to Licensee regarding the use of the Property and the Premises, and shall bear the costs of repairing any damage caused by Licensee’s failure to follow such policies.
(b) Hazardous Materials. Licensee shall comply with all Lease provisions, including, without limitation, the provisions contained in Section 27 of the Lease, and all policies as County and City may establish in their respective discretion concerning the introduction, use, storage, generation, or disposal of Hazardous Materials on the License Area or the Premises.

3.3. Permitted Improvements and Equipment. Licensee shall have the right to make and maintain improvements to the License Area (“Permitted Improvements”) in accordance with the Site Plan/Construction Drawings attached as Exhibit 4 and install the Equipment described in Exhibit 5. (a) Licensee shall obtain all necessary governmental approvals and permits prior to commencing any improvements or modifications, and shall provide County with ten (10) days written notice prior to the start of construction.

All contractors and subcontractors of Licensee for work performed at the License

2.a
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 6 ends

Area shall be duly licensed by the State of California, and all work shall be performed in a good, safe, and workmanlike manner.
(b) Prior to the installation of the Equipment, Licensee must obtain any and all licenses required in order to operate the License Area for the intended use. Copies of such license(s) shall be provided by Licensee to County upon receipt by Licensee.
(c) County enters this License solely in its proprietary capacity as owner of the Premises and not in any capacity as a zoning, land-use, or building/planning authority. Nothing in this License shall be construed as approval or issuance of a use permit, building permit, or any other approval as may be required by and issued by the San Mateo County Department of Planning and Building and/or any other applicable government agency.

3.4. Alterations and Additions.
(a) Definitions. The term “Improvements” means any buildings, structures, fixtures and other improvements, including signs, roads, trails, grading, driveways, parking areas, utility infrastructure, plantings and hardscape. The term “Alterations” includes any additional improvements, equipment, or facilities. (b) In the event City or County consent to the making of any Alterations, or Improvements to the License Area and/or the Premises by Licensee, the same shall be made by Licensee at Licensee’s sole expense.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Licensee and County may mutually agree in writing to have such work performed by the County on behalf of the Licensee. (c) Tier 1 Work. For Alterations to Licensee’s equipment within County’s equipment shed, including like-for-like modifications or the addition of equipment within County’s equipment shed (“Tier 1 Work”), Licensee shall provide City and County ten (10) days prior written notice. City approval shall not be required for Tier 1 Work. Such notice shall include plans, specifications, and information sufficient to verify the exchange or replacement qualifies as similar equipment of substantially the same (or smaller) size and weight, or that the addition of equipment can be accommodated within County’s equipment shelter.

County shall respond to Licensee’s request in writing within ten (10) business days, and County approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. (d) Tier 2 Work. If Licensee engages in any work or alterations to Licensee’s equipment on a tower that constitutes like-for-like exchanges or modifications to Licensee’s tower equipment, or if Licensee replaces existing equipment outdoors within the fence enclosure (“Tier 2 Work”), Licensee shall provide City and County with sixty (60) days’ prior written notice and a request for consent. City and County shall respond to Licensee’s request in writing within ten (10) business days. Licensee shall comply with the requirements of Section 7.1(e) of the Lease. City and County may not unreasonably withhold their approval.

2.a
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 7 ends

(e) Tier 3 Work.

1. Any Improvements, Alterations or work not considered Tier 1 or Tier 2 Work, including the addition of antennas or equipment on a tower or the addition of equipment or Improvements outdoors within the fence enclosure, is “Tier 3 Work,” and requires City’s and County’s prior written consent and shall be conducted in accordance with City-approved and County-approved plans and specifications (“Approved Plans”). City’s approval may be withheld at City’s sole discretion or may be conditioned on, among other things, an increase in Base Rent for proposed additional Tenant’s Facilities (as defined in the Lease). County’s approval may be withheld at County’s sole discretion.

2. Project Review Process for Tier 3 Work; Required
Studies and Analyses. Licensee shall submit a project review application to City and County at least one hundred twenty (120) days before the expected commencement of any proposed Tier 3 Work and shall undergo the SFPUC’s and the County’s project review processes (“Project Review”). City and County shall respond to Licensee’s request in writing within ten (10) business days, detailing Licensee’s next steps for Project Review. After Licensee successfully completes the Project Review process for Tier 3 Work one or more times, the SFPUC’s Watershed Manager or the Watershed Manager’s designee may waive the Project Review meeting requirement (but not the Project Review application requirement) in subsequent similar cases. In conducting any construction, maintenance, repair, expansion or replacement, Licensee shall comply with all conditions and measures imposed by the SFPUC and the County. City and County reserve the right to require a structural review analysis, including engineering specifications and calculations for roof (if applicable) and structure weight and wind loading, stamped and signed by a California licensed professional engineer for Tier 3 Work. City and County reserve the right to require a viewshed study to be conducted at Licensee’s expense, to ensure that the proposed Tier 3 Work is sited and designed to avoid or minimize potential impairment of the land’s scenic values. (f) Consent. Where appropriate in City’s judgment, City will require that Tenant minimize the visual impact of proposed Tier 2 or Tier 3 Work through design, screening and siting. For example, City may require that the Tier 2 or Tier 3 Work blends with and/or complements the color, design and/or character of the surrounding context, whether natural backdrop, building or existing facility. In no event shall City’s approval of Licensee’s plans and specifications be deemed to constitute a representation or warranty by City concerning the suitability of the proposed facilities and improvements for Licensee’s purposes or that the work called for in the plans and specifications complies with applicable building codes or other applicable laws or industry standards nor shall such approval release Licensee from Licensee’s obligation to supply plans and specifications that conform to applicable codes, other laws and industry standards.

3.5. Equipment Conflict. Licensee agrees to use equipment of a type and frequency that will not cause interference with communications equipment currently under the operation and control of County or any other communications

2.a
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 8 ends

provider under an existing permit or agreement with County as of the effective date of this License. If the County’s communication equipment involves public safety communications and if the Equipment causes any interference to public safety communications, the Equipment will be immediately taken out of service without exception by Licensee. If the Equipment interferes with the County’s public safety communications, the determination to take out of service the Equipment shall be at the County’s sole discretion, except as provided below:
(a) Licensee will not cause radio frequency and/or electrical interference to the existing equipment of County or to any other occupant, permittee, or any other user (“Existing User”) of the Premises whose equipment was located at the Premises upon the earlier of: (i) the effective date of this License; or (ii) the date Licensee installs its Equipment, provided that the equipment used by any Existing User or County is operating within the technical parameters specified by its manufacturers and as defined by the Federal Communications Commission. Upon written notice from County to Licensee of such interference, Licensee will take all reasonable steps to correct such interference in a timely manner. If such interference cannot be corrected within five (5) business days from receipt of County’s notice, Licensee will cease using its Equipment, except for testing, until such time as Licensee corrects the interference to County's satisfaction. In the event Licensee cannot correct the interference, Licensee will have the option to terminate this License without further liability hereunder, upon (30) days written notice to County and Licensee shall remove its Equipment in a timely manner and at Licensee’s sole cost and expense. (b) After the date of this License, County will not grant a permit to any other party for use of the Premises or modify any existing agreement for use of the Premises, or change its use of the Premises or permit an Existing User of the Premises to make any changes to its use of the Premises, if such use would in any way materially adversely affect or interfere with the operation of the Equipment. If another occupant, tenant, permittee or other user, or an Existing User of the Premises makes such a change and causes uncorrected radio frequency and/or electrical interference with the Equipment, County will require the party causing such interference to either correct such interference or stop using the equipment that is causing the interference. If after thirty (30) days such interference has not been completely corrected to Licensee’s reasonable satisfaction, Licensee will have the option to terminate this License. (c) Licensee shall not, subsequent to its initial installation of the Equipment, make any modification to the Equipment or the use thereof during the Term that will cause radio frequency and/or electrical interference to the equipment of County then in operation, nor to that of any other occupant, tenant, permittee, or other user of the Premises. Any such user in operation at the time of such modification or change in use shall be considered an Existing User as set forth in Section 3.5(a) above, and the provisions of that Section shall apply.

3.6. Personal Property. Licensee may not store personal property on the License Area or the Premises except personal property used for normal communications operations. Licensee shall be solely responsible for the security

2.a
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 9 ends

of any personal property on the License Area or the Premises. Neither City nor County shall be liable for any claims arising from the theft, loss, or damage of personal property left or stored on the License Area or the Premises. Upon termination of this License, Licensee shall remove Licensee’s personal property.

If Licensee leaves any personal property in violation of this Section, County shall have the rights described in Section 9.3 (Breach) below.

3.7. Liens. Licensee shall not incur, create, or assume any lien on any portion of the License Area or the Premises (including any mechanic’s or material supplier’s liens). Licensee shall keep the License Area and Premises free and clear of any and all liens arising out of any work performed or materials furnished to the License Area or the Premises, and out of any other obligations Licensee may incur.

4. Compliance

4.1. Compliance With Lease
(a) Subordinate to Lease. This License is and shall remain in every manner subject and subordinate to the terms and provisions of the Lease.

Any expiration or termination of the Lease shall cause an automatic termination of this License without the need for any further action on the part of County or City.

Notwithstanding the forgoing, if County’s lease term under said Lease expires or terminates, and County remains in possession of County’s leased Premises on a month-to-month basis under County’s holdover rights in Section 29.13, Holding Over, in the Lease, Licensee shall have the right to hold over with County’s written consent as described in Section 1.4, Holding Over, of this License. Licensee shall not do, or omit to do, any act that could cause a breach or default under the terms of the Lease. Licensee shall comply with the covenants regarding use of the Premises set forth in Section 7.2 of the Lease, and with City’s special provisions contained in Section 24 of the Lease, including without limitation, Nondiscrimination in City Contracts (Section 24.22), Health Benefits for Covered Employees (Section 24.23), Notification of Limitations on Contributions (Section 24.24), Conflicts of Interest (Section 24.27), Tropical Hardwood and Virgin Redwood Ban (Section 24.29), Tobacco Product Advertising Prohibition (Section 24.30), Supervision of Minors (Section 24.32), Food Service Waste Reduction (Section 24.26), and Preservative-Treated Wood Containing Arsenic (Section 24.38).
(b) City Not Licensee's Landlord; No Responsibility or
Liability. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this License, Licensee acknowledges and agrees that City is not Licensee’s landlord, and City shall have no responsibility or liability for any acts or omissions of County with respect to this License, the License Area, or the Premises. City would not be willing to consent to this License without the above agreement and the releases and waivers contained in this License. Licensee acknowledges that it has received a copy of the Lease.

4.2. Compliance With Laws. Licensee shall promptly, and at its sole cost and expense, comply with all present and future laws, orders, and regulations of federal, state, county, regional, and municipal authorities (collectively, “Laws”)

2.a
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 10 ends

applicable to Licensee’s use and operation of the License Area or the Premises, including all environmental, labor, and employment and occupational safety laws.

4.3. Inspection. County may enter the License Area at all reasonable times to inspect the License Area, and for the purpose of taking any other actions County believes are appropriate to protect County’s interests in the License Area.

The presence of County’s or City's representatives on or near the License Area shall not limit or affect in any way Licensee’s obligations under this License. This Section does not and should not impose any duty on County or City to inspect the License Area, report to Licensee the results of any inspection, or assume any liability of any kind arising from inspecting or not inspecting the License Area.

4.4. Taxes. County shall pay all real property taxes, if any, levied against the Premises. Licensee shall have sole responsibility for all taxes and payments required by any federal, state, or local tax authority in connection with Licensee’s improvements and operations and the License Area. Licensee is solely responsible for paying all personal property taxes or assessments levied on Licensee’s personal property on the License Area and all taxes that result from income and profits from Licensee’s operations on the License Area. Licensee recognizes and understands in executing this License that its interest in the License Area created in this License may be subject to a "Possessory Interest Tax" that the County Assessor may impose on such interest, and any such tax would be the liability of and be paid solely by Licensee. Licensee agrees to pay promptly when due, any Possessory Interest Tax imposed on its interest in the License Area and/or Premises.

5. Insurance
(a) At all times during the Term, Licensee shall pay for and keep in effect Commercial General Liability Insurance with limits not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage. Licensee’s policy shall: (a) name as additional insureds County and the City and County of San Francisco and its officers, agents and employees, and (b) state that such policy is primary insurance that applies separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limit of liability. Such policy shall provide for severability of interests and that an act or omission of one of the named insureds that would void or otherwise reduce coverage shall not reduce or void the coverage as to any other insured, and shall afford coverage for all claims based on acts, omissions, injury, or damage that occurred or arose in whole or in part during the policy period. (b) Licensee shall deliver to County (a) on or before the Commencement Date, a certificate of insurance and additional-insured policy endorsements in a form satisfactory to County, evidencing the coverages required by this License, and (b) promptly after County's request, a complete copy of the policy. Licensee shall provide County with certificates or policies thereafter at least ten (10) days before the expiration dates of expiring policies.

2.a
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 11 ends

(c) If Licensee is a public agency, County acknowledges and agrees that Licensee may be permissively self-insured as authorized by the State of California. County shall accept Licensee’s self-insured status as satisfying all insurance requirements hereof provided that Licensee attests in writing that Licensee is self-insured (and/or covered by supplemental excess liability coverage) for any general, automobile and/or professional liability losses up to $1,000,000 per occurrence, and for statutory limits for workers’ compensation insurance.

5.1. County’s Self Insurance. Licensee acknowledges that County selfinsures against casualty, property damage and public liability risks and agrees that County may at its sole election, but shall not be required under this License to, carry any third-party insurance with respect to the License Area or the Premises.

5.2. Waiver of Subrogation. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this License, County, in the event the County does not self-insure, and Licensee (each a “Waiving Party”) each hereby waives any right of recovery against the other Party for any loss or damage sustained by such other Party with respect to the Premises or the License Area or any portion thereof, or the contents of the same or any operation in this License, whether or not such loss is caused by the fault or negligence of such other Party, to the extent (i) such loss or damage is actually recovered from valid and collectible insurance covering the Waiving Party, and (ii) the Waiving Party’s insurance carrier agrees to its written waiver of right to recover such loss or damage.

6. As Is Nature of License Area

6.1. As-Is Condition.
(a) As-Is. Licensee acknowledges and agrees that the License Area is being licensed in, and the License Area is in, its “AS IS WITH ALL FAULTS” condition, without representation or warranty of any kind, and subject to all applicable Laws.
(b) No Representations. Licensee acknowledges that neither County, nor City, nor any of their respective Agents has made any representations or warranties, express or implied, concerning any aspect of the Premises or the License Area, and that any such representation or warranty is hereby disclaimed.

County makes no representations or promises as to the productivity or fitness of the Premises or the License Area for Licensee’s operations on the License Area or the Premises. Licensee acknowledges that it has made its own independent business evaluation in deciding to enter into this License.

6.2. No Duty to Repair or Maintain License Area. County and City shall have no duty whatsoever for any repair or maintenance of the License Area.

6.3. No Assignment. This License is personal to Licensee and shall not be assigned, conveyed, or otherwise transferred by Licensee under any circumstances. Any attempt to assign, convey, or otherwise transfer this License

2.a
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 12 ends

shall be null and void and cause the immediate termination and revocation of this License.

7. Waiver of Claims

7.1. Waiver of Claims. Licensee covenants and agrees that neither County nor City shall be responsible for or liable to Licensee, to the fullest extent allowed by Law, and Licensee hereby waives all claims and rights against County, City, and their respective employees, agents, and contractors and releases such parties from any and all Losses (defined in Section 8.1 (Indemnification) below), including, but not limited to, (i) incidental and consequential damages relating to any injury, accident or death of any person, or loss or damage to any property, in or about the License Area, the Premises, or any other City property, from any cause whatsoever, known or unknown; (ii) flood, fire, or explosion; (iii) theft or other criminal or tortious act of third parties including other licensees; (iv) interruption of any public utility or service; (v) leaking, issuing, or flowing into any part of the License Area or the Premises, by natural occurrence or otherwise, of any substance; or (vi) the expiration or termination of the Lease. In connection with the foregoing releases, Licensee acknowledges that it is familiar with Section 1542 of the California Civil Code, which reads:

A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, and that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party.

Licensee acknowledges that the releases contained in this License include all known and unknown, disclosed and undisclosed, and anticipated and unanticipated claims. Licensee realizes and acknowledges that it has agreed upon this License in light of this realization and, being fully aware of this situation, nevertheless intends to waive the benefit of Civil Code Section 1542, or any statute or other similar law now or later in effect. The releases contained in this License shall survive any termination of this License.

7.2. No Relocation Assistance. Licensee acknowledges that it shall not be a displaced person at the time this License is terminated or expires by its own terms, and Licensee fully RELEASES, WAIVES, AND DISCHARGES forever any and all claims, demands, rights, and causes of action (including, without limitation, consequential and incidental damages) against, and covenants not to sue, City, its departments, commissions, officers, directors, and employees, and all persons acting by, through, or under each of them, under any present or future Laws, including, without limitation, any and all claims for relocation benefits or assistance from City under federal and state relocation assistance laws (including, but not limited to, California Government Code Section 7260 et seq.). Without limiting Licensee’s obligations under Section 8, Licensee shall Indemnify (as defined in Section 8) City and the other Indemnified Parties (as defined in Section 8) for any and all Losses arising out of any relocation assistance or benefits payable to Licensee.

2.a
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 13 ends

8. Indemnification

8.1. Indemnification. Licensee, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless forever (the “Indemnity”) County and City, including, but not limited to, all of their respective boards, commissions, departments, agencies, and other subdivisions, including, without limitation, City’s Public Utilities Commission, and all of its and their respective directors, commissioners, employees, agents, and contractors, and their respective heirs, legal representatives, volunteers, successors and assigns, and each of them (the “Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, liabilities, damages, liens, injuries, penalties, fines, lawsuits, judgments, and awards (“Losses”) incurred in connection with or arising directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, out of this License or any breach by Licensee of this License, or the entry upon, or use or occupancy of the License Area, the Premises, or any other City property by Licensee or its officers, directors, employees, agents, contractors, suppliers, customers, invitees, or guests, including, without limitation, the introduction, use, storage, generation, or disposal of Hazardous Materials, by Licensee in or on the License Area or the Premises, except to the extent resulting from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the party seeking to be indemnified. The foregoing Indemnity shall include, without limitation, reasonable fees of attorneys, consultants, and experts and related costs, and the costs of investigating any Loss. For clarity, it is understood that Licensee’s indemnification obligation to County and its related Indemnified Parties includes any claims by City against County arising from a breach of the Lease or this License by Licensee or otherwise arising from Licensee’s use and occupancy of the License Area and the Premises.

8.2. Acknowledgement. Licensee specifically acknowledges and agrees that it has an immediate and independent obligation to defend County, City, and the other Indemnified Parties from any claim that actually or potentially falls within this indemnity provision, even if such allegation is or may be groundless, fraudulent, or false, and that such obligation arises at the time such claim is tendered to Licensee by County or City and continues at all times thereafter.

Licensee’s obligations under this Section shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this License.

9. Termination, Default, and Remedies

9.1. Termination by Licensee. Licensee shall have the right to terminate this License at any time by giving written notice to County. Such termination shall be effective ninety (90) days after delivery to County of such notice. Termination by Licensee shall not entitle Licensee to withhold or obtain a refund of license fees or other sums due under this License, or to obtain any compensation or damages from County or City.

9.2. Termination by County. Notwithstanding any other provision of this License or any course of performance under this License, County may at its sole option terminate this License at any time by giving written notice to Licensee for the following reasons:

2.a
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 14 ends

(a) If the Equipment causes interference with County’s
communication equipment located on the Premises and the Equipment cannot be corrected, or
(b) If County determines that the Premises or any portion thereof, including the License Area, has a more appropriate use
including, but not limited to, any County or City use; or (c) If Licensee remains in default under Section 9.3 (Breach) of this License after the applicable cure periods.

Such termination shall be effective ninety (90) days after delivery of such notice, and at such time Licensee shall immediately surrender the License Area in the condition required hereunder. Termination by County shall be without liability or obligation to pay consideration to Licensee, including without limitation, any obligation to return to Licensee any part of the License Fee or other fees.

If County terminates this License under the provisions of the above Section 9.2(b), County shall use commercially reasonable efforts in assisting Licensee in identifying a “Replacement Location” on the Premises. In the event an adequate Replacement Location can be identified, County and Licensee shall execute an amendment to this License modifying the description of the License Area and development and use conditions as necessary and appropriate, and this License shall remain in full force and effect. Licensee shall pay all relocation costs incidental to such substitution of the License Area. In the event that an adequate Replacement Location cannot be located, Licensee shall have the right to terminate this License upon at least ninety (90) days prior written notice to County, and this License will terminate on the same terms and conditions as if it had expired at the end of the Term.

Upon termination as provided for under the terms of this Section 9.2, neither Party will owe the other Party any further obligation under the terms of this License, except as may otherwise be specifically provided in this License and except for Licensee’s responsibility to remove all of Licensee’s communications Equipment from the License Area and restore the License Area to its original condition, as near as practicable, save and except normal wear and tear and acts beyond Licensee’s control.

9.3. Breach. If Licensee fails to perform or comply with any provision of this License when such performance or compliance is required by the terms of this License, such failure shall constitute a breach of this License. County may provide Licensee with written notice of such breach. If Licensee fails to cure the breach within thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice, provided that if it is not feasible to cure such default within such 30-day period, Licensee shall have a reasonable period to complete such cure if Licensee promptly undertakes action to cure such default within such 30-day period and thereafter diligently pursues the same to completion within sixty (60) days after the receipt of notice of default from County.

County shall not be required to provide such notice more than twice in any twelve (12) month period with respect to any material non-monetary defaults and after the

2.a
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 15 ends

second notice in any calendar year, any subsequent failure by Licensee during such 12-month period shall constitute an Event of Default hereunder. County may terminate this License upon delivery of notice of uncured breach to Licensee.

County shall in its sole discretion determine whether the breach has been cured.

Nevertheless, in the event of any breach by Licensee, County shall have all the rights and remedies available to it at law or in equity.

9.4. Termination of Lease. As provided by Section 4.1 (Compliance with Lease) above, this License shall terminate automatically without need for action by County or Licensee upon the expiration or termination of the Lease.

Notwithstanding the forgoing, if County’s lease term under the Lease expires or terminates, and County remains in possession of County’s leased Premises on a month-to-month basis under County’s holdover rights in Section 29.13, Holding Over, in the Lease, Licensee shall have the right to hold over with County’s written consent as described in Section 1.4, Holding Over, of this License.

9.5. Surrender. Licensee shall surrender the License Area in good condition, order and repair, free from hazards and clear of all debris, immediately upon the expiration or termination of this License. At such time, Licensee shall remove all of its property from the License Area or the Premises permitted under this License, and shall repair, at its cost, any damage to the License Area or the Premises caused by such removal. Licensee’s obligations under this Section shall survive any termination of this License.

9.6. Remedies. All of County’s rights, powers, and remedies under this License are cumulative and not alternative and shall be in addition to all rights, powers, and remedies given to County at law or in equity. The exercise of any one or more of these rights or remedies shall not impair County’s right to exercise any other right or remedy. NEITHER COUNTY NOR CITY SHALL BE LIABLE TO

LICENSEE FOR ANY DIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL,

EXEMPLARY, PUNITIVE, OR INDIRECT DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR

OTHERWISE RELATED TO THIS LICENSE (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED

TO, CLAIMS FOR LOSS OF REVENUE, LOSS OF PROFIT, OR LOSS OF USE)

EVEN IF COUNTY OR CITY HAS BEEN APPRISED OF THE LIKELIHOOD OF SUCH DAMAGES. Licensee under no circumstances shall be entitled, directly or indirectly, to any form of compensation or indemnity from County or City, or to obtain an injunction, specific performance, or other equitable remedy as consequence of this License for any reason.

10. Authorized Representative of the County of San Mateo. The County Manager, or the designee of the County Manager, shall be the only authorized agent of the County of San Mateo for purposes of giving any notices (including, but not limited to, termination under the terms hereof), enforcing any provision, or exercising any rights, options, privileges, or obligations of the County of San Mateo under this License. This License shall not be valid or have legal effect unless executed by the President of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo pursuant to a Resolution adopted in accordance with the California Government Code, or by the County Manager or designee under authority granted pursuant to a Resolution adopted in accordance with the California Government Code.

2.a
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 16 ends

11. Notices. All notices or demands are deemed to have been given or made when delivered in person or delivered by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, United States mail, and addressed to the respective parties as follows:

County: County of San Mateo
County Executive's Office
Real Property Division
555 County Center, 4th Floor
Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone: (650) 363-4047
Email: [email protected]
With a copy to: County of San Mateo
Information Services Dept.
455 County Center, 3rd Floor
Redwood City, CA 94063
Attn: Communications Manager
Phone: (650) 599-1069
Licensee: Pacifica Police Dept.

Attn: Captain Bill Glasgo
2075 Coast Hwy
Pacifica, CA 94044
650-738-7314
The address to which any notice or demand may be given to either Party may be changed by thirty (30) day prior written notice.

12. San Mateo County No-Smoking Ordinance. Licensee is aware that on April 18, 2006, the County of San Mateo modified its Ordinance Code, adopting Section 4.96.040, which prohibits smoking in all County facilities whether owned or leased. Licensee understands that such Ordinance authorizes County to enforce the provisions contained in this License and Licensee agrees to enforce the provisions of such ordinance on the License Area.

13. Non-Discrimination
(a) Licensee shall comply with any applicable provisions of Section 504 of the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which provides that no otherwise qualified handicapped individual shall, solely by reason of a disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. (b) No person shall, on the grounds of race, color, religion, ancestry, sex, age (over 40), national origin, medical condition (cancer), physical or mental disability, sexual orientation, pregnancy, childbirth or related medical condition, marital status, or political affiliation be denied any benefits or subject to discrimination under this License.

2.a
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 17 ends

(c) Licensee shall ensure equal employment opportunity based on objective standards of recruitment, classification, selection, promotion, compensation, performance evaluation, and management relations for all employees under this License. Licensee’s equal employment policies shall be made available to County upon request.
(d) With respect to the provision of employee benefits, Licensee shall comply with the County Ordinance that prohibits contractors from discriminating in the provision of employee benefits between an employee with a domestic partner and an employee with a spouse.

14. General Provisions

14.1. Disclosure Requirements. Licensee understands and agrees that City’s Sunshine Ordinance (San Francisco Administrative Code Chapter 67) and the State Public Records Law (Government Code Section 6250 et seq.) apply to this License and to any and all records, information, and materials submitted to City in connection with this License. Accordingly, any and all such records, information and materials may be subject to public disclosure in accordance with City’s Sunshine Ordinance and the State Public Records Law. Licensee hereby authorizes City to disclose any records, information, and materials submitted to City in connection with this License.

14.2. Modifications to License Agreement. Due to the unique nature of each communications operation, County and Licensee may agree to additional terms in respect of such operations. Any such additional terms are subject to City’s approval and shall be consistent with the Lease and set forth in a separate addendum, which shall be attached to this License and become a part of this License. All modifications to this License, whether under this Section or otherwise, shall be in writing and state that the writing is an amendment to this License, approved by City, and subject to the provisions of the Lease.

14.3. Severability. The invalidation of any provision of this License, or of its application to any Party, by judgment or court order, shall not affect any other provision of this License or its application to any other Party or circumstance, and the remaining portions of this License shall continue in full force and effect, unless enforcement of this License as invalidated would be unreasonable or grossly inequitable under all the circumstances or would frustrate the purposes of this License.

14.4. Captions. Captions to the sections of this License are included for convenience only and are not intended and shall not be deemed to modify or explain any of the terms of this License.

14.5. No Presumption Against Drafter. This License shall be construed without regard to any presumption or rule requiring construction against the Party drafting the License.

2.a
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 18 ends

14.6. Relationship. Licensee and County are and shall remain independent commercial contracting Parties. County and Licensee are not running a business together. The arrangements contemplated by this License are not intended to and shall not create a partnership, joint venture, employment, fiduciary, or similar relationship for any purpose. Neither Licensee nor County have the power or authority to bind or obligate the other to a third party or commitment in any manner.

14.7. Consent. Whenever under this License the consent or approval of either Party is required or a determination must be made by either Party, no such consent or approval shall be unreasonably withheld or delayed, and all such determinations shall be made on a reasonable basis and in a reasonable manner.

14.8. Binding on All Successors. This License is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the permitted successors and assigns (as approved in advance in writing by City) of County and Licensee.

14.9. Governing Law. This License shall be governed by, and in all respects construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California.

14.10. Third Party Beneficiary. County and Licensee acknowledge and agree that City is a third party beneficiary under this License and as such has the power to enforce the terms of this License; provided however, that Licensee and County acknowledge and agree that City has no responsibilities or obligation to any Party by reason of this License, except as provided by this Section. Except as specifically provided in this Section, this License is for the exclusive benefit of County and Licensee and not for the benefit of any third party including, without limitation, any employee, family member, contractor, or customer of Licensee.

14.11. Venue. Licensee agrees that the venue for any civil action filed concerning Licensee’s obligations under the terms of this License and the Lease shall be the Superior Court for San Mateo County.

14.12. Counterparts. This License may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

14.13. Recitals and Exhibits. The Recitals set forth above and the exhibits referenced in and attached to this License are incorporated into this License.

14.14. Other City License Provisions. The provisions set forth in attached Exhibit 3 (City License Provisions) are incorporated into and made a part of the License as of the Effective Date.

14.15. Supersedure. This License supersedes and voids any prior license, lease or agreement between the Licensee and the County identified in this License with regards to the License Area.

2.a
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 19 ends

14.16. Entire Agreement. The Parties intend that this License, its Exhibits, and the Lease shall be the final expression of their agreement with respect to the subject matter of this License and may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior or contemporaneous oral or written agreements or understandings. Should there be any ambiguity or conflict between this License and any policy issued by County, this License shall control. For convenience, this License expressly identifies various provisions of the Lease with which Licensee must comply. Such identification in no way qualifies or limits Licensee’s obligations to comply with provisions of the Lease not so expressly identified.
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

2.a
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 20 ends

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, County and Licensee have executed and delivered this License as of the last date written below.

COUNTY:

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
By: ____________________________
Name:Michael P. Callagy
Title: County Executive Officer
Date: __________________________
ATTEST:
__________________________
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________
Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City
Attorney
LICENSEE:

CITY OF PACIFICA,
a municipal corporation
By: ____________________________
Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager
Date: __________________________

2.a
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

Page 21 ends

EXHIBITS:

Exhibit 1: Depiction of County’s Leased Premises
Exhibit 2: Vault Layout Floor Plan
Exhibit 3: City License Provisions
Exhibit 4: Permitted Improvements
Exhibit 5: Licensee’s Equipment

2.a
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement) Exh. 1
-1
EXHIBIT 1
County’s Leased Premises
EXHIBIT 1 to License
Depiction of Premises
Montara Mountain – North Peak
SFPUC Parcel No. 31
SMCO – Montara Mountain –North Peak
SFPUC Property Boundary (Approx.)
SMCO Licensed Area 6th Street 7th Street N

2.a
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

SPACE ASSIGNMENTS LIST OF EQUIPMENT

VAULT ITEM DESCRIPTION SPACE
1 A MDF
2 3 B POLYPHASOR
4 C BREAKERS
5 6 D A/C UNIT
7 8 E SHELF
9 AGENCY /OCCUPANT
PACIFlCA PD & FIRE JPA

CALTRANS

STATE PARKS
FlSH &: GAME
CALSAMTRANFlRE CZU LOCAL NET M/R SAMTRANS 2
S 3
NATIONAL PARKS 1
NATIONAL PARKS 2
10 NATIONAL PARKS 3 F CHP FlLTER
11 PG&E RACK 1
PG&E RACK 2 G TRANSFER PANEL
12 13 PG&E RACK 3 H GENERATOR PROTECTED ELECTRICAL PANEL 14 NATIONAL PARKS 4
30'-5" 15 COUNTY M/W 1 J NON-GEN ELECRTICAL PANEL
16 COUNTY M/W 2
17 COUNTY M/W 3 K GENERATOR 0 ©° �� 18 UASI M/W 1
G 19 UASI M/W 2
© 20
[ - 21
G 1 22 TV COMBINER
]0 - 23 UHF TRUNK
2 24 MUIIJAL AID
0 -
3 25 CLEMARS FlRE
]@ � C
- 26 VTAC LG2 RX
4 27
� - 28 © 5 29
© � - 30 I
6 27'-0" - 31
7 32
D© - 33 CHARGER
34 CHP 1
29 I 30 I 31 I 32 I I 35 CHP 2
36 BATTERY
8 I 9 I 0 10
22 I 23 I 24 I 25 I 26 I I
27 I
28 I
11 I 12 I ;"""- 13 NOTES:
\,..,_"'" * 1. DRAWING CHANGES REQUIRE VAULT MANAGER'S APPROVAL 15 I 16 I 11 I 18 I 19 I
20 I
21 I 2. BUILDING AND TOWER ARE COUNTY PROPERlY.

3. FOR PLOT PLAN AND SITE ACCESS; SEE DWG: 441095-029.

4. FOR ANTENNA SPACE ASSIGNMENTS; SEE DWG: 441095-031.
\_ OLD CABLE ENTRY PORT
10·-o·

FLOOR PLAN
0 5 10

I I I I I I I I I I
SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
K 5-23-24 MD UPDATE VAULT SPACE #20 & 21 MR NORTH PEAK, SAN MATEO CO. (P&R)* OWNER NJO!Cf: CAD FILE NUMBER:
015371K1
2-14-22 MZ CDF-CZU OOZ707V001: ADDED CAL ARE TO RACK SPACE 5 BOK ENG: RA UNIT: SA 1-2-15 KM UPDATE & REDRAWN MR VAULT LAYOUT
FLOOR PLAN DR: DC llAlE: 6-84
3-9-04 DC CHP075654W6: ADD DESCRIPTION TO SPACES 11 & 12. LK SCALE: SHOWN SHr: 1 OF: 1 9-8-01 S.F. UPDATED PER PUM 100474W02 VAULT EXPANSION & OOT104001V001 DSM RE.V llAlE BY DESCRIPTION APPi) CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFlCE° OF EMERGENCY SERI/ICES SIZE DRAWING NUMBER RE.V TABLE OF CHANGES 801 SEQUOIA PACIFIC BL'ID SACR.IM...,,.. CA PUBLIC SN'EIY COMMUNICATIONS 95811-1>231 [E] CI 441095-030 I K EXHIBIT 2, PAGE 1 OF 1

VAULT LAYOUT FLOOR PLAN

2.a
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement) Exh. 3-1
EXHIBIT 3
City License Provisions
A. Notification of Limitations on Contributions
By its execution of this License, Licensee acknowledges that it is familiar with Section 1.126 of the San Francisco Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code, which prohibits any person who contracts with the City for the selling or leasing of any land or building to or from City whenever such transaction would require the approval by a City elective officer, the board on which that City elective officer serves, or a board on which an appointee of that City elective officer serves, from making any campaign contribution to (a) the City elective officer, (b) a candidate for the office held by such individual, or (c) a committee controlled by such individual or candidate, at any time from the commencement of negotiations for the contract until the later of either the termination of negotiations for such contract or twelve months after the date the contract is approved.

Licensee acknowledges that the foregoing restriction applies only if the contract or a combination or series of contracts approved by the same individual or board in a fiscal year have a total anticipated or actual value of $100,000 or more. Licensee further acknowledges that the prohibition on contributions applies to each private entity constituting Licensee; each member of Licensee’s board of directors, and Licensee’s chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and chief operating officer; any person with an ownership interest of more than twenty percent (20%) in Licensee; any subcontractor listed in the contract with City; and any committee that is sponsored or controlled by Licensee. Additionally, Licensee acknowledges that Licensee must inform each of the persons described in the preceding sentence of the prohibitions contained in Section

1.126. Licensee shall provide City with the names of each person, entity, or committee described above.

B. Bottled Drinking Water
Unless exempt, Licensee agrees to comply fully with and be bound by all of the provisions of the San Francisco Bottled Water Ordinance when on the Premises, as set forth in San Francisco Environment Code Chapter 24, including the administrative fines, remedies, and implementing regulations provided in that statute, as the same may be amended from time to time. The provisions of Chapter 24 are incorporated by reference and made a part of the License as though fully set forth.

C. Prohibition of Tobacco Sales and Advertising
Licensee acknowledges and agrees that no advertising or sale of cigarettes or tobacco products is allowed on the Premises. This advertising prohibition includes the placement of the name of a company producing cigarettes or tobacco products or the name of any cigarette or tobacco product in any promotion of any event or product.

D. Prohibition of Alcoholic Beverage Advertising
Licensee acknowledges and agrees that no advertising of alcoholic beverages is allowed on the Premises. For purposes of this Section, "alcoholic beverage" shall be

2.a
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement) Exh. 3-2
defined as set forth in California Business and Professions Code Section 23004, and shall not include cleaning solutions, medical supplies, and other products and substances not intended for drinking. This advertising prohibition includes the placement of the name of a company producing alcoholic beverages or the name of any alcoholic beverage in any promotion of any event or product.

E. Food Service Waste Reduction
On the Premises, Licensee agrees to comply fully with and be bound by all of the provisions of the Food Service Waste Reduction Ordinance, as set forth in the San Francisco Environment Code, Chapter 16, including the remedies provided in that statute, and implementing guidelines and rules. The provisions of Chapter 16 are incorporated in the License by reference and made a part of the License as though fully set forth in this License. This provision is a material term of the License. By entering into this License, Licensee agrees that if it breaches this provision, City will suffer actual damages that will be impractical or extremely difficult to determine. Without limiting City's other rights and remedies, Licensee agrees that the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) liquidated damages for the first breach, Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) liquidated damages for the second breach in the same year, and Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) liquidated damages for subsequent breaches in the same year is a reasonable estimate of the damage that City will incur based on the violation, established in light of the circumstances existing at the time this License was made. Such amounts shall not be considered a penalty, but rather agreed monetary damages sustained by City because of Licensee's failure to comply with this provision.

2.a
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement) Exh. 4-1
EXHIBIT 4
Permitted Improvements
[NOTE: NO PERMITTED IMPROVEMENTS TO BE SHOWN]

2.a
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement) EXHIBIT 5, PAGE 1 OF 2: LICENSEE'S EQUIPMENT
EXHIBIT 5, PAGE 1 OF 2:

LICENSEE'S EQUIPMENT

2.a
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement) 7'-6"
48 7'-0"
40 45
6'-0"
35 5'-o"
30 4'-o"
20 25
3'-0"
15 2'-0"
10 1'-0"
0 5
0 PACIFICA
P
DEPT.

OLICE
&

FIRE JPA
RADIO

EQUIPMENT

LOCATED

IN THIS
RACK
RACK 1
NOTES:

MK-8
DUPLEXER 800MHz
SINCLAIR Q4220E-1
IM PANEL (TELEWAVE) TS900PA 1

DANIELS POWER AMPLIFIER
PA8-1AC-RSF-DE-1
VEGA DSP-223
DANIEL MT-4E (DOT)
TX/RX: 856.7625/811.7625 MHz
TX/RX CTCSS: 110.9 Hz

AC POWER STRIP

NEWMAR POWER SUPPLY BATT CHRG
PM-12-70 W CFB OPTION

POWER DISTRIBUTION PANEL
SPU PDP-176
ENR SBSC11 F BATTERIES
2 EA 12V DC/92AH &
BT-113A BATTERY TRAY
RACK 2
DOT

TELEWAVE IM PANEL BP &
MODEL:

DUPLEXER
TPCD-8646SPIM2

DANIELS POWER AMPLIFIER
35W
MODEL: AMP-860-045A-D1 R
DANIEL MT -4E
800 MHz RADIO
TX:855.7375 MHz
AC POWER STRIP X:810.7375 MHz
ioo MHz M/R
TX DCS: 115
r.NE
=
WM
""'""
AR
c=--a
P
=-=
ow
=
ER
==-=su
'"'"'
pp
=
LY

77.,...,-:BArr==-=cHR
=
G X =-i DCS: 115
1---� PM�-�12�--4 �0 �W�C�F �B �O_PT�
IO -----i
�N

POWER DISTRIBUTION PANEL
SPU PDP-176-12
ENRSYS XE95 BATTERIES
2 EA 12V DC/95AH &
BT-113A BATTERY TRAY
RACK 3

1. ALWAYS MEASURE RACK SPACES STARTING AT ZERO.
(THE TOP OF THE BASE ANGLE PLATE)

2. FOR VAULT LAYOUT, SEE DWG: 441095-030. 4. RACK IS 7 FT.

3. FOR INTERCONNECT DIAGRAM, SEE DWG: 441095-062.

AC POWER STRIP

DUPLEXER (F&G)
SINCLAIR Q2222E-1
IM PANEL SINCLAIR PC2213

POWER AMPLIFIER
CRESCEND 100W
F&G
DSP-223 F&G
DANIEL MT-4E F&G
TX/RX: 151.415/159.435MHz
TX RX CTCSS: 1 41 .3 Hz

NEWMAR POWER SUPPLY BATT CHRG
PM-12-45 W CFB OPTION
SPU 12V DC POWER DISTRIBUTION PANEL
SPU P/N PDP-176
ENR SBS-C11 F BATTERIES
2 X 92 AH EACH
RACK 4
F&G
B-441095-028
::E
C N N
:z
0 :z
w
0 u
0 ::E ::E
:;J gj
I
°" ,.._
I I
I c, N
°"
0 I
I
ffi �
EXHIBIT 5, PAGE 2 OF 2: LICENSEE'S EQUIPMENT

2.a
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: North Peak Communications License Agreement (5888 : Resolution - North Peak License Agreement)

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/24/2025
1 SUBJECT:

Authorize the Submittal of a Grant Application to the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways for the Beach Boulevard Infrastructure Resiliency Project RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt the resolution entitled "Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica Authorizing the Submittal of Grant Applications to the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways for the Beach Boulevard Infrastructure Resiliency Project.” STAFF CONTACT:

Roland Yip, P.E., DPW Deputy Director/City Engineer
(650) 738-3771
[email protected]
Louis Sun, P.E., Interim DPW Director
(650) 738-4660
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The Beach Boulevard Infrastructure Resiliency Project (BBIRP) will replace Pacifica's failing seawall with a deep-foundation seawall, rock scour apron, and sand placement to protect critical infrastructure from coastal erosion and storm surges. The project includes four phases: (1) Feasibility & Alternatives Analysis (Completed), (2) Design, Environmental Review & Permitting (Ongoing), (3) Construction, and (4) Post-Construction Monitoring & Maintenance. Once completed, BBIRP will safeguard Beach Boulevard, stormwater and sewer systems, utilities, and public amenities, ensuring long-term coastal resilience, public safety, and economic stability for Pacifica.

The BBIRP is a multi-phase City led project that aims to create a multi-benefit solution to the Beach Boulevard corridor in historic West Sharp Park. The Beach Boulevard Seawall and Promenade spans from just north of Paloma Drive to the southern terminus near Clarendon Road and the Sharp Park levee. Since the construction of the seawalls, there have been numerous failures of the north wall. During times of high tides and big swells, wave action overtops the seawall sending water clear across Beach Boulevard, affecting public safety by causing road closures, localized flooding, and property damage. With the frequency and magnitude of failures increasing, combined with sea level rise outlook, it appeared critical to begin planning for replacement and adaptation of this area, which may include the reconstruction of the promenade area.

The City has been working to advance the BBIRP project, with a more recent action of the Council occurring on November 28, 2022, when the City Council approved an amendment with GHD, Inc. (coastal engineers) to begin the second phase of the project. More specifically, the approval was for the first subphase of Phase 2, titled Phase 2a - preliminary project design. The subphase began the preliminary design of the hybrid concept approved by the City Council on 3 Packet Pg. 69
Pacifica City Council 2
March 24, 2025
June 9, 2021, following public input that included a seawall, rock scour apron, and beach nourishment. Phase 2a advanced the shoreline protection concept, approved by City Council in Phase 1, through preliminary design development resulting in a well-defined Project supported with analyses, drawings, and visualizations suitable for community outreach meetings to share information on the Project and solicit feedback on specific Project features. The City anticipates completing Phase 2a by the end of the year.

On March 28, 2024, the City Council authorized the submittal of an application to California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways (DBW) for Phase 2b, the environmental documentation phase. The DBW fiscal year 2025/26 applications are still being reviewed under their budget process and finalized budgets will be done by June of this year.

The City of Pacifica is applying for a grant of $2.5M to fund ongoing efforts in Phase 2c:

Permitting and Final Design of the BBIRP. This includes completing 100% Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E), and securing regulatory permits.

The DBW is accepting grant applications for the Waterways Shoreline Erosion Control for potential funding in the State’s fiscal year 2026/27 budget. The Shoreline Erosion Control Program assists in the planning and construction of all types of beach erosion control and shoreline stabilization measures, including hard structures like seawalls. This program is authorized in statute by Harbors and Navigation Code sections 65-67.4 and can fund up to 50 percent of nonfederal project costs. City required matching funds are discussed in the Fiscal Impact section of this report. A resolution authorizing the submittal of the application by the City Council is required by DBW.

The City Manager recommends the Council adopt a resolution authorizing the submittal of an application to the California State Parks Division Department Boating and Waterways Shoreline Erosion Control.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

Council may choose not to adopt the resolution. However, not doing so will make the City ineligible to receive California State Parks Division Department of Boating funds. Staff does not recommend this alternative action.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:
• Improve and steward City infrastructure, streets, and facilities: Adopting the resolution will make the funds available to progress the Beach Boulevard Infrastructure Resiliency Project.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Adopting the resolution commits the City to provide the required matching funds of $1,250,000 for the Shoreline Erosion Control Program, should the grant be received. The City's matching funds would come from the Disaster Accounting Fund (Fund 38).

ORIGINATED BY:

Public Works
3 Packet Pg. 70
Pacifica City Council 3
March 24, 2025
ATTACHMENT LIST:
3 Packet Pg. 71
Pacifica City Council 4
March 24, 2025
RESOLUTION NO. ________

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA AUTHORIZING THE

SUBMITTAL OF GRANT APPLICATIONS TO THE CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS DIVISION

OF BOATING AND WATERWAYS FOR THE BEACH BOULEVARD INFRASTRUCTURE

RESILIENCY PROJECT
WHEREAS, Sections 65 through 67.4 of the Harbors and Navigation Code authorize the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways (DBW) to do the following: study erosion problems; act as shore protection advisor to all agencies of government; and plan, design and construct protective works when funds are provided by the Legislature. In addition, Sections 69.5-69.9 of the Harbors and Navigation Code authorize DBW to pursue and promote federal and local partnerships to restore, enhance, and nourish publicly owned beaches through the cost-effective engineered placement of sand on the beach or in the nearshore environment; and
WHEREAS, DBW is accepting grant applications for shoreline erosion control projects; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pacifica began the Beach Boulevard Infrastructure Resiliency Project (BBIRP) for coastline protection by seeking funding to complete appropriate studies, design, and environmental review; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of these grants is to protect essential public infrastructure along the City’s shoreline.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pacifica formally approves the submittal of application for grant funding from DBW for the BBIRP project. • • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 24th day of March 2025, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/24/2025
1 SUBJECT:

Award FY 2025-26 Pavement Resurfacing Project
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt the Resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica Approving the Construction Contract with Pavement Coatings Company in the amount of $1,586,657.90; Authorize a budget authority in the amount of $1,824,656.59, which includes contingencies in an amount not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the Construction Contract amounts; Authorize staff to Execute Future Change Orders not to exceed the contingency amount; and Authorize the City Manager to sign Contract Documents related to the FY 2025-26 Pavement Resurfacing Project.”
STAFF CONTACT:

David Harvey, Assistant Civil Engineer
(650) 738-3768
[email protected]
Roland Yip, P.E., DPW Deputy Director/City Engineer
(650) 738-3771
[email protected]
Louis Sun, P.E., Interim DPW Director
(650) 738-4660
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

On July 8, 2024, the City Council approved the new 5-year Street Maintenance Program for FY 2025-26 to 2029-30 (Attachment “A”). The goal of the 5-year Street Maintenance Program is to prevent streets from falling into more expensive repair categories by using a combination of slurry seal and rubber cape seal treatments. The slurry seals keep good streets in the good condition category, which is the least expensive way to maintain streets and considered best practice. The rubber cape seals are used as an inexpensive stopgap measure on the streets in poorer condition categories. The rubber cape seal, along with localized pavement repairs, will protect the street surface in poorer condition categories for a period of twelve to fifteen years, slowing further deterioration of the street. This will allow time for the City to identify other pavement funding sources for street rehabilitation. In addition to slurry seal and rubber cape seal treatments, the program will continue to use overlay and reconstruction treatments to a limited number of streets based on the recommendations from the City’s pavement management software, StreetSaver.
4 Packet Pg. 73
Pacifica City Council 2
March 24, 2025
The FY 2025-26 Pavement Resurfacing Project will resurface approximately 8.13 miles of City pavement and follows the Council approved 5-year Street Maintenance Program. The program generally alternates areas of the City where street maintenance will occur, as shown on the map provided in Attachment A. This year, the project will resurface various streets in Pedro Point, Linda Mar, and Park Pacifica neighborhoods in Pacifica, while next year’s program concentrates on streets in the Fairmont and Manor area. The type of treatments used generally follow the 5- year Street Maintenance Program to use surface seals for FY 2025-26. The overall project scope will include rubber cape seals, double slurry seals, slurry seals, asphalt concrete grinding and paving, microsurfacing base repairs, pavement striping and markings and other miscellaneous related work. The project will be funded by money the City receives from SB 1 (Fund 10) and Measure A (Fund 09).

There have been challenges with the posting of “no parking” signs and notifications to the public with our recent paving projects. In order to limit the construction impacts to the community, additional liquidated damage sections have been added to the project specifications for street blocks posted for construction and not completed for any reason and hand delivering notifications three days prior to work.

On August 12, 2024, the City Council approved a Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Pacifica and NCE for Design and Engineering Services related to the FY 2025-26 Pavement Resurfacing Project. The project will resurface various streets in Pacifica (see Attachment Project Plans). The project plans are also available to view on the City's website at:
https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/17640/638471426421430000 The Project was advertised on January 17, 2025, and January 24, 2025, in accordance with the formal bid process. Thirty-eight (38) companies downloaded plans and specifications and seven (7) companies submitted bids. On February 11, 2025, the bid opening was held via Zoom by the City Clerk and the result is as follows:

Company Bid
S&H Construction, Inc. $1,468,600.00
BuildCorp, Inc. $1,574,280.00
Pavement Coatings Company $1,586,657.90
American Pavement Systems, Inc. $1,599,968.00
DRYCO Construction, Inc. $1,660,891.00
American Asphalt Repair & Resurfacing Co., Inc. $1,696,073.95 VSS International, Inc. $1,793,325.00
S&H Construction, Inc. (S&H Construction) was the lowest apparent bidder with a bid of $1,468,600, BuildCorp, Inc. (BuildCorp) was the second lowest bidder with a bid of $1,574,280 and Pavement Coatings Company (Pavement Coatings) was the third lowest bidder with a bid amount of $1,586,657.90. Both American Pavement Systems, Inc. and Pavement Coatings Co. protested the bids submitted by S&H Construction and BuildCorp, with formal bid protest letters submitted on February 12, 2025. Additionally, American Pavement Systems protested the bid submitted by Pavement Coatings.

After detailed review of bids submitted by S&H Construction and BuildCorp, the bid documents and relevant project documents, City staff recommends that the bids submitted by S&H 4 Packet Pg. 74
Pacifica City Council 3
March 24, 2025
Construction and BuildCorp be deemed non-responsive to the bid solicitation for the following reasons:
• The Project Technical Specifications requires the Contractor to “… submit proof of successful completion of at least three (3) asphalt rubber chip seal projects of like magnitude and comparable difficulty and rates of progress. In addition, Contractor shall submit proof that the superintendent or foreman to be utilized and present throughout the entire project has successfully completed at least three (3) asphalt rubber chip seal projects of like magnitude and comparable difficulty and rates of progress.” The comparable projects that S&H Construction and BuildCorp provided for the City’s review do not involve asphalt rubber chip seal work of like magnitude and comparable difficulty, as compared to the FY 2025-26 Pavement Resurfacing Project. In addition, both companies have not demonstrated that the company has self-performed asphalt rubber chip seal work on three projects.

American Pavement Systems’ protest claims that Pavement Coating’s submission of an unsigned subcontractor list in place of the provided form to list subcontractors renders its bid non-responsive. After detailed review of submitted bid and relevant project documents, City staff has denied the American Pavement Systems bid protest towards Pavement Coatings and waive any minor irregularities in the Pavement Coatings submitted bid for the following reasons:
• The submission of an unsigned subcontractor list that otherwise provides the information required does not provide American Pavement Systems with a competitive advantage.

Accordingly, the City has determined that Pavement Coating’s use of its own form in place of the City’s form is not a material discrepancy in the bid and does not render Pavement Coatings bid nonresponsive. Although Pavement Coatings did not sign its subcontractor list, in submitting its bid, Pavement Coatings certified the completeness and accuracy of the representations made in the bid forms, which includes its subcontractor list.

Therefore, with S&H Construction and BuildCorp’s bids deemed non-responsive, the lowest responsive bid is from Pavement Coatings Company with a bid amount of $1,586,657.90. All required documentation was submitted with their bid. Pavement Coatings has performed a City resurfacing project in the past and their work has been satisfactory. As there are sufficient project funds approved as part of the FY 2024-2025 budget, the City Manager recommends the award of contract (Attachment "B") to the apparent low bidder, Pavement Coatings Company. In addition, a 15% contingency is recommended to allow enough funding to handle any additional improvements that are identified during construction.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

Council may choose not to adopt the resolution and not approve the construction contract.

However, this will result in project delays and possible increase in construction cost. Staff does not recommend this alternative action.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:
4 Packet Pg. 75
Pacifica City Council 4
March 24, 2025
Approval of the construction contract is consistent with the following Council adopted Goals:
• Improve and steward City infrastructure, streets and facilities: FY 2025-26 Pavement Resurfacing Project will improve various city streets in Pacifica.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The following is the source and use of funds for the project:

Total Project Source and Use of Funds
SB1 (Fund 10) $1,000,000.00
Measure A (Fund 9) $824,656.59
Total Source of Funds $1,824,656.59
FY 2025-26 Pavement Resurfacing Project $1,586,657.90
Project Contingency, 15% $237,998.69
Total Use of Funds $1,824,656.59
No additional budget authority is necessary as sufficient funds have been allocated in the SB 1 (Fund 10) and Measure A (Fund 09) for FY 2024-25 budget for this project. Any remaining funds will go back to the appropriate street construction fund for future pavement resurfacing projects.

ORIGINATED BY:

Public Works
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment A - 5-Year Street Maintenance Program (PDF)
Attachment B - Pavement Coating Agreement (PDF)
4 Packet Pg. 76
Pacifica City Council 5
March 24, 2025
RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA APPROVING THE

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH PAVEMENT COATINGS COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,586,657.90; AUTHORIZE A BUDGET AUTHORITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,824,656.59, WHICH INCLUDES CONTINGENCIES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED FIFTEEN PERCENT (15%) OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AMOUNTS; AUTHORIZE

STAFF TO EXECUTE FUTURE CHANGE ORDERS NOT TO EXCEED THE CONTINGENCY AMOUNT; AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN CONTRACT DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE FY 2025-26 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT
________________________________________________________________________

WHEREAS, consistent with the City of Pacifica’s Bidding Procedures for Public Projects (Municipal Code Title 3 Chapter 15) the City of Pacifica advertised the Request for Bids FY 2025-26 Pavement Resurfacing Project on January 17, 2025, and January 24, 2025; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2025, the bid opening was held by the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, S&H Construction, Inc. (S&H Construction) was the lowest apparent bidder with a bid of $1,468,600, BuildCorp, Inc. (BuildCorp) was the second lowest apparent bidder with a bid of $1,574,280 and Pavement Coatings Company (Pavement Coatings) was the third lowest bidder with a bid amount of $1,586,657.90. Both American Pavement Systems, Inc. and Pavement Coatings Co. protested the bids submitted by S&H Construction and BuildCorp, with formal bid protest letters submitted on February 12, 2025. Additionally, American Pavement Systems protested the bid submitted by Pavement Coatings; and WHEREAS, the Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer, has determined that S&H Construction’s bid and BuildCorp’s bid for this project are both non-responsive. The comparable projects that S&H Construction and BuildCorp provided for the City’s review do not involve asphalt rubber chip seal work of like magnitude and comparable difficulty, as compared to the FY 2025-26 Pavement Resurfacing Project; and
WHEREAS, after reviewing American Pavement Systems, Inc. protest letter and the bid specifications and submittals, the City has determined that the failure of Pavement Coatings to include a subcontractors list in the City’s form and without a signature in its bid proposal is not a material discrepancy in the bid and does not render Pavement Coatings bid nonresponsive.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pacifica authorizes entering into the construction contract for the FY 2025-26 Pavement Resurfacing Project with Pavement Coatings Company and authorizes and authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents.
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 24th day of March 2025, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:
4 Packet Pg. 77
Pacifica City Council 6
March 24, 2025
ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
_________________________________
Sue Beckmeyer, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ _________________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 4 Packet Pg. 78
FY 2025/26 to FY 2029/30 Work Plan
City of Pacifica
FY 25/26
FY 26/27
FY 27/28
FY 28/29
FY 29/30

4.a
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Attachment A - 5-Year Street Maintenance Program (5887 : Award FY 2025-26 Pavement Resurfacing Project) FY 2025/26
City of Pacifica

4.a
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Attachment A - 5-Year Street Maintenance Program (5887 : Award FY 2025-26 Pavement FY 2026/27
City of Pacifica

4.a
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Attachment A - 5-Year Street Maintenance Program (5887 : Award FY 2025-26 Pavement FY 2027/28
City of Pacifica

4.a
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Attachment A - 5-Year Street Maintenance Program (5887 : Award FY 2025-26 Pavement FY 2028/29
City of Pacifica

4.a
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Attachment A - 5-Year Street Maintenance Program (5887 : Award FY 2025-26 Pavement FY 2029/30
City of Pacifica

4.a
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Attachment A - 5-Year Street Maintenance Program (5887 : Award FY 2025-26 Pavement

!"#$%
#
%
&'()*+,*-*./*%012$*3/4/3*2
%56(66

"7) 89
"7):8;
:)%<8::-:7

#!=(=>?=@$%;:-:7 8:)98#%
7<$8"A:

B% :C-*.3D=62=(=>

EFB:7 #
% "7"#
"7 8%
"8C

G$*01H1+,
I*,/+JK
IL

M

GN(N@(5
OF)
"$:"# P:Q"8R )11)3IS1I4QI.T*,,*3D1U*K%SS1+U/V%L WF
"-$:7)% "7#"8Q"8RLXYZ[\ZX[]^ZXZ_\X`a
Y^ZbXYcX[Zd
eX[fa
[cX[`
ghYg
[Zdb^
[

`
YZi
I+,.*3,
)jHkb^l&2>m@2@>'L5(nZXo
abg^i3D13TI+1pGq
kr_h`a^h`sqkt_h`a^h`ubZda[X[
^^av`
YZ^sqwkra
[
ZZ\d
g^\d
gh_
Xc[Z
^Yg\d[
^nhaZXh[YZ

gYXZZX
x\

g`XhYZXcyzzzzzzzzzz
__av`
YZ^i3D13TI+1pG
t^d__r^d__YXZo
^ho{
\ZZXcb|
a
[\
YZq}k[
Z
YZbXY
~F)
P:B9:"#$:8#"8-%7
:#"8 P:Q"8RLXYZ[\ZX[^d__\X``
Y\
Yg\X`a_
Z
Zd
eX[fovZd

cX__XubYgZ
^G
X``
Y\
`
YZZ
^d__o
XYZd
gZ

^Zo_b^d
gbYZd
XZb\
ZX [X\

guY
[[
^
[|
^Zd
[bdZZX`XgbcvX[_Z
[
Zd
X``
Y\
`
YZZ
XcZd
eX[f

bY_X`a_
ZbXYZ
GebZdbY@(\_
Yg[gv^XcX``
Y\
`
YZZ

~FEMbhbgZ
g`

`XhYZ^

^_bhbgZ
gg`
^cX[g
_vXYZ[\ZX[^d__avuY
[#Ij. DIjK*+U
IPj+U.1UgX__[^qynkcX[
\d
vZdZ
xab[
^cZ
[Zd
Zb`
^a
\bcb
gd
[
bYcX[XYZ[\ZX[ZX\db
|
ho^ZYZb_X`a_
ZbXYXcZd

YZb[
eX[fnhYZb_
\db
|
g

^_bhbgZ
gg`
^cX[g
_vXYZ[\ZX[^d__avuY
[#Ij. DIjK*+U
IPj+U.1UgX__[^qynkcX[
\d
vZdZ
xab[
^cZ
[Zd
Zb`
^a
\bcb
gd
[
bYcX[XYZ[\ZX[ZX\db
|
bY_X`a_
ZbXYXcZd

YZb[
eX[fnhYZb_
\db
|
g
~FO\Xa
XcMbhbgZ
g`
^
XYZ[\ZX[YguY
[[

ZdZo
\h^
XcZd
YZh[
XcZd
[X{
\ZnbZuXh_go
b`a[\Zb\_X[
xZ[
`
_vgbccb\h_ZZXcbx
Zd
`XhYZXc^h\d\Zh_g`
^bY\h[[
govuY
[o
\h^
Xcg
_vbY\X`a_
ZbXYXc__X[Yva[ZXcZd
eX[f
XYZ[\ZX[YguY
[[

ZdZ^a
\bcb
g`
^h[
^Xc_bhbgZ
gg`
^^d__o
a[
^h`
gZXo
Zd
`XhYZXc^h\d
g`
^\Zh__v^h^ZbY
govuY
[nYgZdZo
\h^
XcZd
YZh[
XcZd
[X{
\ZnbZuXh_go
b`a[\Zb\o_
X[
xZ[
`
_v
gbccb\h_ZZXcbxZd
\Zh_g`
^
MbhbgZ
gg`
^cX[g
_v^d__\X|
[g`bYb^Z[Zb|
nX|
[d
gnbYZ
[
^ZXYoXYg^nYg
Y
[__X^^Xcaho_b\h^

g`
^^hcc
[
govuY
[^[
^h_ZXcg
_vMbhbgZ
gg`
^^d__YXZ\X|
[Zd
\X^ZXc\X`a_
ZbXYXcZd
eX[fn
g`
^[
^h_ZbYc[X`
c
\Zb|
eX[fn_X^Z[
|
Yh
^X[\X^Z^Xc^ho^ZbZhZ
c\b_bZb
^nX[g`
^^hcc
[
govXZd
[^udX
Zd
Y^

fZX[
\X|
[Zd
b[g`
^c[X`uY
[qcX[
x`a_
ng
_v\_b`^XcXZd
[\XYZ[\ZX[^n^ho\XYZ[\ZX[^nZ
YYZ^nX[
XZd
[Zdb[ga[Zb
^knYgg
c
Y^
\X^Z^Zd
[
XcuY
[`vg
gh\Zc[X`Yv`XY
vgh
X[ZXo
\X`
gh
ZXXYZ[\ZX[
^ho^
h
YZZXZb`
cX[\X`a_
ZbXYXc
YZb[
eX[fYg
xZ
Y^bXY^XcZb`
__Xu
gah[^hYZZXa[X|b^bXY^d
[
Xcn^h` [
a[
^
YZbYZd
Y\\[h
g_bhbgZ
gg`
^

4.b
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Attachment B - Pavement Coating Agreement (5887 : Award FY 2025-26 Pavement Resurfacing Project)

!"#$%&'(%&))(%#*

+,-./01/-023445
06-07/3
8-09:.11-0;.1
<:/3/3
/
072.;1-.;:/:-.2-6/3:2
0

7 ./.;/3
6-44-<:.
//137
./2=/-
/3
0>'?@ABCDA&?DEFG@AHIJ

55 .;:K
1-5
-68-09
L
55 .;:KL
.
04-.;:/:-.2

55 .;:K.2M0.1

N
55 .;:KN-.2/0M1/:-.OP-0.;
/
0:42 Q7
./L-.;

55 .;:K
-.2/0M1/:-.
06-07.1
L-.;

55 .;:KM554
7 ./4-.;:/:-.2

+R3
-./01/N-1M7
./20
/3
2-4
.;
K14M2:S
50-S:2:-.2/3/-S

0./3
8-09
.Q50-S:2:-.1-./:.
;:..Q
<.
05M0132
-0;
0:22M
;:.1-..
1/:-.<:/3/3:2
0

7 ./-0.Q8-092344P
.M44.;S-:;.;23443S
.-6-01

-0
66 1/

+T
0

7 ./.M7P
07M2/55
0-.44:.S-:1
2.;1-00
25-.;
.1

.;:.S-:1
2:.;M54:1/
:77
;:/
4QM5-.
5 06-07.1
-68-09-0;
0 ;3
0 -.-02-/3
0<:2
50-S:;
;:./3
-./01/N-1M7
./2/-J
'UAV?WXCDUWUDCY&GZCBAFG@A?WXE[\UD]?B^HY
_`a#C@AC"CBUC$bGYXCDUWUDCY'$cdadd

JXCbGFG@A'?CAU@eH'?*8
J'UAV?WXCDUWUDC

fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff :./M0
:./M0

fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff g
S:.8--;3-M2
>:/Q
.
0
0:./7
h:/4

ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff N/
N/

N

J

J
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

:13
44
013
//g
.Q-.>:/Q
//-0.

Q03-66
Q>:/Q4
09

$iiBGHHGH?W%?AUDGHj $iiBGHHGH?W%?AUDGHj
S
7 ./-/:.2- :/Q-6 1:6:1 kL
44
S
>M:/
kkl./
0:
S
107
./->
mnon 1:6:1>
mppp

qrstuvsrwxyz{|}~
q

4.b
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Attachment B - Pavement Coating Agreement (5887 : Award FY 2025-26 Pavement Resurfacing Project)

!"!#
$%&%'(%
)*'++%%&%'(
,
-
!!".

,/!!".0
1 /
+2
3-4

5 6
/

,
(

*7/18119
: ;<=
,,>%#"
4?

!"!#$%&%'(%
)*'++%%&%'(@8

,?

+2
3-4

5 6 !!".0/"/!&+&( 7

, (

9 ,2

3-4

5

!!".0/"/"&+&( %

4
A,?
(

9 ,2

3-4

5

6 !!".0/#/!"&+&( %

4
A,?
(

9 ,2

3-4

5

6 !!"../!/!&+&( 7

,?
(

9 ,2

3-4

5

6
7/!!"./!0/"&+&((

/
4

-,5
!!"./!0/"&+&(

4.b
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Attachment B - Pavement Coating Agreement (5887 : Award FY 2025-26 Pavement Resurfacing Project)

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/24/2025
1 SUBJECT:

Adoption of Ordinance to Revise Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 Garbage Collections of the Pacifica Municipal Code
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Waive second reading and adopt by title only an Ordinance repealing and replacing sections 6-

5.103, 6-5.104, and 6-5.105 of Chapter 5, “Garbage, Collection and Recycling” within Title 6, “Sanitation and Health” relating to the size of waste containers and frequency of collection.

STAFF CONTACT:

Louis Sun, P.E., Interim Public Works Director
(650) 738-4660
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

This ordinance was introduced at the regular meeting of the City Council on March 10, 2025 and is now in order for adoption. Additional background was provided in the staff report with the ordinance introduction at the March 10, 2025 City Council meeting.

On July 9, 2024, the San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury issued a report titled “Restaurant Exteriors: The Neglected Space” (Attachment A, “Grand Jury Report”). The Grand Jury Report states that restaurant garbage and food waste is not always contained in designated exterior bins, and may overflow, attracting animals and other undesirable pests. While restaurant interiors are subject to County of San Mateo Health System standards and inspections, restaurant exteriors are subject to a variety of standards and inspection programs due to each jurisdiction having its own regulations for sanitation and safety for exteriors. Generally, inspections are done when complaints are received. The extent of issues varies based on the municipality, day of the week due to garbage collection days, and whether the back of the building is visible to the public.

The Grand Jury Report presents examples of restaurant exterior waste storage areas and areas below parklets in deficient, unsanitary, unsightly, and other conditions. The investigation found the standards for these areas to be inconsistent, and in some cases non-existent, with County and City policies. The Grand Jury Report includes recommendations for a proactive approach to handling garbage and parklet sanitation problems around restaurant exteriors and suggests approaches to preventative maintenance.

The City’s response (Attachment B) to the Grand Jury Report’s findings and recommendations focuses on recommendation number 4 (R4) of the Grand Jury Report, which states: By June 30, 2025, inspectors for all jurisdictions with restaurants should be empowered to require owners/operators to add receptacles or increase the frequency of pick-ups.

The City’s Response to R4 stated the following:
5 Packet Pg. 88
Pacifica City Council 2
March 24, 2025
“Response to R4. This recommendation has yet to be implemented and will be implemented in the future. As mentioned in the City’s response to Finding 4, the Manor Shopping Center is one of the only commercial areas with reoccurring unacceptable restaurant trash conditions. The smaller businesses operating within the Manor Shopping Center have at least one to two trash pickups a week scheduled with Recology. Depending on the merchant or need, some sites have up to four pickups a week.

5.104. All garbage containers must be collected by Recology of the Coast at least once a week pursuant to PMC section 6-5.105. The current ordinance does not allow the City the authorization to regulate the size and quantity of garbage containers or to regulate the frequency of pickups beyond once a week.

Required Action: By June, 30, 2025, the City shall amend PMC section 6-5.104 to allow the City to require sites to increase the number of garbage containers and amend PMC section 6-5.105 to allow the City to require sites to increase the frequency of pickups, identified as insufficient by the City.”
Based on the City’s Response to R4, the proposed Ordinance amends Sections 6-5.103, 6-

5.104 and 6-5.105 of the Pacifica Municipal Code to authorize the City to regulate the size and quantity of garbage containers or to regulate the frequency of pick-ups beyond once a week.

The City’s Community Development and Public Works Departments have also collaborated along with EOA, Inc., the City’s contracted C.4 Stormwater Business Inspectors, to the City of Pacifica and San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program’s standards, to improve the overall program. Staff also discussed the revisions in the proposed Ordinance with Recology, which did not have any objections to the changes.

The proposed Ordinance makes the following changes to Title 6- Sanitation and Health, Chapter 5- Garbage Collections and Recycling, Article 1. Garbage Collection. The complete Article 1.

Garbage Collection municipal code with the amendments can be found on (Attachment C).

The proposed Ordinance would add a new subsection (g) in Section 6-5.103 to read as follows:

Sec. 6-5.103. Garbage: Collection services required: Responsibility of owners. ….(g) The City may require a different size or quantity of waste container(s) than the size or quantity assigned to or selected by the owner, as well as a higher frequency of collection beyond the subscribed or regularly scheduled service, if the volume of garbage, rubbish, or waste exceeds the capacity of the provided container(s) or the frequency of collection is inadequate for the garbage, rubbish or waste generated by the owner. The City shall notify the owner and the company in writing if the City determines that a different size or quantity of waste container(s) or a higher frequency of collection is required.

The proposed Ordinance would add conforming language to Section 6-5.104 and 6-5.105 by referencing the new language in subsection (g) as indicated by the underlined text below.

Sec. 6-5.104. Garbage: Receptacles: Size: Design.

All garbage, refuse, rubbish, and waste matter shall be placed by the person upon whose 5 Packet Pg. 89
Pacifica City Council 3
March 24, 2025
premises it shall have been produced or accumulated in containers of size, design, and weight as provided in the franchise agreement between the scavenger and the City however, the City may require a different size or quantity of waste container(s) than the size or quantity assigned to or selected by the owner as provided in section 6-5.103(g).

Sec. 6-5.105. Garbage: Receptacles: Delivery to scavengers.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

Decline to adopt the Ordinance with the proposed revisions to Sections 6-5.103, 6-5.104 and 6-

5.105 and provide direction to staff on compliance with R4 of the San Mateo County Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

Approval of the response is consistent with the following Council-adopted Goal:
• Goal 2: Improve and steward City infrastructure, streets and facilities.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impact of accepting this report and implementing the recommendations are minimal and can be addressed within budgeted resources. Any additional costs for services would be passed on to the customer based on the franchise agreement approved fee schedule.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT:

The proposed Ordinance is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15000 et seq.), including without limitation under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the adoption of this Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.

ORIGINATED BY:

Public Works
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (PDF) Attachment B - Draft Responce to Civil Grand Jury Report (PDF) Attachment C -Redlines to Title 6_ Chapter 5_Article 1-Garbage_Collection - Code changes to sections 6-5.103 - 6-5.105 (DOCX)
5 Packet Pg. 90
Pacifica City Council 4
March 24, 2025
ORDINANCE NO. (ID # 5883)
ORDINANCE NO. ___________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA REPEALING AND REPLACING SECTIONS 6-5.103, 6-5.104 AND 6-5.105 OF CHAPTER 5, “GARBAGE, COLLECTION AND RECYCLING” WITHIN TITLE 6, “SANITATION AND HEALTH”

RELATING TO SIZE OF WASTE CONTAINERS AND FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION WHEREAS, on July 9, 2024, the San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury issued a report titled “Restaurant Exteriors: The Neglected Space” (“Grand Jury Report”), which included, among other things, a recommendation for a proactive approach to handling garbage and parklet sanitation problems around restaurant exteriors and suggests approaches to preventative maintenance; and
WHEREAS, Recommendation Number 4 (“R4”) of the Grand Jury Report, recommends that by June 30, 2025, inspectors for all jurisdictions with restaurants should be empowered to require owners/operators to add receptacles or increased the frequency of pick-ups; and WHEREAS, the City’s response to R4 of the Grand Jury Report indicates that WHEREAS, Grand Jury Report, Recommendation No. 4 provides that the City shall amend PMC section 6-5.104 to allow the City to require sites to increase the number of garbage containers and amend PMC section 6-5.105 to allow the City to require sites to increase the frequency of pickups, identified as insufficient by the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Pacifica does ordain as follows:

Section 1. Recitals. The City Council of the City of Pacifica does hereby find that the above referenced recitals are true and correct and material to the adoption of this Ordinance.

Section 2. Amendment. Sections 6-5.103, “Garbage: Collection services required:
responsibility of owners”, 6-5.104, “Garbage: Receptacles: Size: Design”, and 6-5.105, “Garbage: Receptacles: Delivery to scavengers” within Chapter 5, “Garbage, Collection and Recycling” of Title 6, “Sanitation and Health” shall be repealed and replaced in its entirety to read as follows:
“Sec. 6-5.103. Garbage: Collection services required: Responsibility of owners. (a) The owner of each and every residential unit, and each and every occupied hotel, motel, apartment house, and rooming house, and each and every premises occupied for business, commercial, or industrial use shall subscribe to and pay for refuse collection services as provided in this chapter.
(b) The provisions of this section are not intended to prevent an arrangement of, or the continuance of, an existing agreement under which the subscription to and payment for such refuse collection services are made by a tenant or any agent on behalf of an owner.

However, such arrangement or future arrangements shall not relieve the owner's obligation as provided in this chapter.
5 Packet Pg. 91
Pacifica City Council 5
March 24, 2025
(c) The scavenger shall provide with each regular billing information on the more common refuse collection rates, a telephone number for customers to contact the company for service and billing information, and notice that refuse collection service is mandatory in the City and requires new residents to make arrangements for such service within fifteen (15) days after occupancy. The scavenger shall also send out a more detailed notice on all refuse collection rates to all City property owners and tenants once each year. (d) It shall be the responsibility of the owner of each parcel of property occupied for residential, commercial, or industrial use to request the scavenger to initiate refuse collection service as provided in this chapter within fifteen (15) days after the occupancy of any premises required to have refuse collection. If an owner shall fail to request the initiation of refuse collection service as provided in this chapter, the scavenger shall initiate and continue refuse collection service for such premises and bill the owner for such service. (e) Owners who are delinquent in their payment for refuse collection services shall be subject to the penalties set forth in the franchise agreement between the scavenger and the City and the collection provisions of Section 6-5.112 of this chapter. (f) The company shall establish a process for receiving and acting upon customer complaints.

The company shall inform customers of the procedure for filing a complaint and shall provide forms for such purpose. The company shall maintain a record of all customer complaints filed, including the name and address of the customer, a description of the complaint, the time the complaint was received, and the action taken in response to the complaint. The records shall be maintained at the company's office and shall be available for inspection by the City during the company's office hours. (g) The City may require a different size or quantity of waste container(s) than the size or quantity assigned to or selected by the owner, as well as a higher frequency of collection beyond the subscribed or regularly scheduled service, if the volume of garbage, rubbish, or waste exceeds the capacity of the provided container(s) or the frequency of collection is inadequate for the garbage, rubbish or waste generated by the owner. The City shall notify the owner and the company in writing if the City determines that a different size or quantity of waste container or a higher frequency of collection is required.

Sec. 6-5.104. Garbage: Receptacles: Size: Design.

All garbage, refuse, rubbish, and waste matter shall be placed by the person upon whose premises it shall have been produced or accumulated in containers of size, design, and weight as provided in the franchise agreement between the scavenger and the City however, the City may require a different size or quantity of waste container than the size or quantity assigned to or selected by the owner as provided in section 6-5.103(g).

Sec. 6-5.105. Garbage: Receptacles: Delivery to scavengers.

The contents of garbage containers shall be delivered not less than once each week to the scavenger authorized by the City to collect garbage in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and the franchise agreement between the City and the scavenger however, the City may require a higher frequency of collection beyond the subscribed or regularly scheduled service, if the frequency of collection is inadequate for the garbage, rubbish or waste generated by the owner as provided in section 6-5.103(g).”
All other sections of Article 1 of Chapter 5, Title 6 of the Pacifica Municipal Code shall remain unchanged.
5 Packet Pg. 92
Pacifica City Council 6
March 24, 2025
Section 3. Compliance with CEQA. The City Council hereby finds that the action to adopt this Ordinance is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15000 et seq.), including without limitation under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the adoption of this Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.

Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it should have adopted the Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentence, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional.

Section 5. Publication. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to certify to the passage of this Ordinance by the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, and cause the same to be published in accordance with State law.

Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effective thirty (30) days after its adoption and shall be published and posted as required by law. • • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special and regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 24th day of March 2025, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
____________________________
Sue Beckmeyer, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________ ____________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 5 Packet Pg. 93
Pacifica City Council 7
March 24, 2025
* * * * *
(ID # 5883) at 3/24/2025 5:00 PM City Council Regular Meeting 5 Packet Pg. 94
1 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury
RESTAURANT EXTERIORS: THE NEGLECTED SPACE
ISSUE
The exterior trash areas of food service businesses are often unsightly and unsanitary. How can this issue be addressed?

SUMMARY
Restaurant garbage and food waste is not always contained in designated exterior bins, and may overflow, attracting animals and other undesirable pests. While restaurant interiors are subject to County of San Mateo Health System standards and inspections, restaurant building exteriors are subject to a variety of standards and inspection programs, because each local jurisdiction has its own regulations for sanitation and safety for exteriors. For restaurant exteriors, responsibility for enforcement of local code and for inspection schedules varies from city to city. Generally, inspections are done when complaints are received. The extent of the issues may vary based on the municipality or district, day of the week (garbage collection day), or whether the building backs are visible to the public.

Grand Jury members conducted interviews with County officials, city officials, and waste handlers and performed their own spot checks (admittedly not scientific). A written survey (Appendix B) was sent to all twenty cities and towns in the County.

The Grand Jury found a significant number of restaurant exterior waste storage areas and areas below parklets had clearly deficient, unsanitary, unsightly and odorous conditions. The investigation found that the “standards” for these areas, i.e., how these conditions were monitored, and how codes and policies were enforced, to be inconsistent at best and non-existent in some instances. A quantification of the waste storage area problem proved difficult as many sites and their condition were dependent on the day of the week and their garbage pick-up days.

This Grand Jury report includes recommendations for a more proactive approach to handling the garbage and parklet sanitation problems around restaurant exteriors in San Mateo County, and suggestions for preventive maintenance.

5.a
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 2 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury

BACKGROUND
People spent 20.7% more money at restaurants than on groceries in 2022. That figure rose to

29.5% in the first two months of 2023 according to Commerce Department data.1 This significant increase in use of restaurants and “micro” and “mobile” food services, not surprisingly, resulted in an increase in organic (food stuff) waste, paper, glass and general garbage.

Members of the Civil Grand Jury initiated this review of the health and safety conditions surrounding the immediate areas designated for waste removal after observing an increase in rodents around parklets. Initial walkthroughs behind restaurants determined that the problem related to waste management in general as well as to the parklets. Photos contained in Appendix A depict some of the disturbing findings.

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
California Health & Safety Code, Chapter 7 known as the “Retail Food Code” regulates, at the State level, the protections required for public health and safety of a “Food Facility”.2 The Code

1 https://www.census.gov/retail/marts/www/marts_current.pdf 2 H&S Code 113789 (a) “Food facility” means an operation that stores, prepares, packages, serves, vends, or otherwise provides food for human consumption at the retail level, including, but not limited to, the following:
(1) An operation where food is consumed on or off the premises, regardless of whether there is a charge for the food.
(2) A place used in conjunction with the operations described in this subdivision, including, but not limited to, storage facilities for food-related utensils, equipment, and materials. (b) “Food facility” includes permanent and nonpermanent food facilities, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) Public and private school cafeterias.
(2) Restricted food service facilities.
(3) Licensed health care facilities, except as provided in paragraph (12) of subdivision (c). (4) Commissaries.
(5) Mobile food facilities.
(6) Mobile support units.
(7) Temporary food facilities.
(8) Vending machines.
(9) Certified farmers’ markets, for purposes of permitting and enforcement pursuant to Section 114370.

5.a
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 3 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury
has extensive requirements for the handling of food, preparation and service of patrons. They can best be described as affecting the “inside” of the Food Facility.

The exterior or waste disposal areas are only mentioned in Article 4, Section 114245.4. “If provided, an outdoor storage area or enclosure used for refuse, recyclables, and returnables shall be constructed of nonabsorbent material such as concrete or asphalt and shall be easily cleanable, durable and sloped to drain.”3 Refer to Appendix C for the California Health & Safety Code Article 4.

The enforcement of these State Regulations is assigned to “Enforcement Officers”4of an “Enforcement Agency”5 which is delegated to more local organizations at the county or other local level. Section 1143906gives the power to inspect facilities, take samples and prepare a written report of deficiencies.

HEALTH DEPARTMENT INSPECTIONS
The San Mateo County Health Department is primarily responsible for the inspection of restaurants and enforcement of the Health Codes related to them. The Inspection checklist (Appendix D) has 60 categories for inspection and only one (FO42) relates to waste disposal or garbage. In interviews, the Grand Jury found the Health Inspector does not generally inspect the areas behind the facility and does not inspect areas not immediately adjacent to the facility at all.

The County relies on the individual cities for enforcement of their nuisance laws in these areas.

As part of its Municipal Code, each City or jurisdiction maintains provisions for enforcement actions against properties (and operators) that maintain unhealthy, noxious, or dangerous conditions under their police powers to abate public nuisances. (See Bibliography)

LAND USE / USE PERMITS

It is beyond the scope of this investigation to analyze the municipal codes of each of the twenty jurisdictions in San Mateo County which have restaurant uses. Most cities require “use permits”

(10) Farm stands, for purposes of permitting and enforcement pursuant to Section 114375. (11) Fishermen’s markets.
3 Sections 114244 to 114245.3 inclusive speak only to the Food Facility which is defined as the interior of the facility.
4 113774. “Enforcement officer” means the director, agents, or environmental health specialists appointed by the Director of Health Services, and all local health officers, directors of environmental health, and their duly authorized registered environmental health specialists and environmental health specialist trainees.
5 113773. “Enforcement agency” means the department or the local health agency having jurisdiction over the food facility.
6 114390 :
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&division=104.&title=& part=7.&chapter=13.&article=2

5.a
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 4 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury
(conditional or otherwise) for restaurants in certain locations. As part of the building permit process, cities have the ability to require and specify the type, location, and frequency of waste disposal. More importantly, all have a general requirement that these areas be maintained at the owner/operator expense in a good and sanitary manner.

WASTE HAULERS / SANITATION COMPANIES
By far the biggest recipient of waste and disposal in the County is Recology San Mateo County serving the cities of Belmont, Burlingame, East Palo Alto, Foster City, Menlo Park, Redwood City, San Carlos, and San Mateo, the town of Hillsborough, County of San Mateo, North Fair Oaks, and West Bay Sanitary District. Recology of the Coast provides service to Pacifica.

GreenWaste provides service to the town of Atherton.

South San Francisco Scavenger Company (SSFSC) serves businesses and residents in South San Francisco, Millbrae, Brisbane and San Francisco International Airport. Half Moon Bay, Daly City and the unincorporated North County has an agreement with Republic Services, Inc. to provide recycling, compost and garbage collection services.

Each hauler negotiates independently on rates and pick-up policy. The Grand Jury reviewed the Franchise Agreement used by Recology. The agreement provides that the hauler shall replace or repair bins, dumpsters and other containers as needed or upon request.

DISCUSSION
SURVEY
The Grand Jury sent a survey to twenty jurisdictions (see Appendix B). Five jurisdictions relied solely on the County Health Department for enforcement of regulations related to restaurant waste facilities; two inspected and enforced only at the permit renewal stage; and nine assigned the duty to their code enforcement mechanism generally through Planning, Public Works or dedicated Code Enforcement personnel. Only three of the jurisdictions conducted inspections independent of a complaint. The majority, nine of fourteen, only inspected upon receipt of a complaint. (See Appendix B for the tabulated Survey results).

In summary, survey responses demonstrate that the Cities rely on the County Health Department for inspections of restaurant interiors and, in general, only respond to exterior conditions upon receipt of a complaint.

OBSERVATIONS
The condition at any one site is dependent on the frequency of trash removal. The site may be fine right after removal but, as the week goes on, the situation worsens. There does not appear to be any site-specific requirements (or at least any that are enforced) for residual cleaning such as power washing. Few sites inspected had any method of controlling wash down or steam cleaning waste from flowing into the storm sewers. The type of restaurant also impacts its output, e.g., some generate grease, oil and animal fat, which require special containers.

5.a
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 5 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury
The current requirements for trash enclosures by local jurisdictions are applied only to new applications, resulting in many outdated, legacies facilities and, without regular inspection, there is no monitoring of maintenance or repair. These areas are high impact areas and the enclosures and bins, dumpsters and cans are subject to heavy use. The Grand Jury found many bins, dumpsters and cans to be in damaged and filthy condition.

Economic forces impact maintenance and overflow conditions. An operator of a restaurant pays for disposal service by volume (size and number of containers) and frequency (number of pickups in one week). Increases in business generate higher volumes so what was working in the past may not be sufficient for the current or future situation. It is logical that operators of food facilities would see added frequency of pickups or added containers as a negative and an expense. This is a financial impact question.

IMPACTS ON THE COMMUNITY
Normal sanitation issues apply; smell, unsightliness and vermin7. Vector Control does not inspect trash or similar areas unless specifically requested. The Grand Jury interviews revealed instances of the presence of rats, mice and raccoons in trash areas and parklets. Insect infestation is also of concern. All this presents a health hazard to the public, the workers at these restaurants, and the trash collectors.

ENFORCEMENT OF EXISTING REQUIREMENTS
The County Health Department inspections do not include the areas outside of the building. The enforcement of the nuisance provisions by local jurisdictions is reactive and only called into play upon a complaint. Oversight of the condition of receptacles (dumpsters, bins, cans) is minimal, at best, and often non-existent.

SPECIAL CASES
Mobile Food Facilities (Food Trucks): The Permit Checklist for food trucks does not mention waste disposal. Food Truck regulation is an evolving body of regulation and should be reviewed at a later date.
https://www.smchealth.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/20170915_mff_selfinspectionche cklist.pdf?1536778880
Farmer’s Markets: Several markets were visited by Jurors. Only the Farmer’s Market in San Carlos was the subject of an interview. This particular market occurs on a Sunday. It is organized

7 H&S Code 113939. “Vermin” means cockroaches, mice, rats, and similar pests that carry disease.

H&S Code 13939.1. “Vermin infestation” means the presence of vermin within the food facility as evidenced by actual live bodies, fresh droppings or vomitus, urine stains, or gnaw marks, that could result in contamination to the food, equipment, packaging, or utensils.

5.a
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 6 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury
by a private company (a community-based organization, CBO) which recruits and manages the individual Farmers and Vendors. The company polices the area at the breakdown of the Market on Sunday afternoon. The city of San Carlos has a street sweeper go over the area on Monday morning. These actions appear to be sufficient as the area was observed to be clean and free from refuse.

Parklets: Like Food Trucks, parklet regulation is evolving and should be reviewed in more detail at a later date. There are currently no separate inspection line items for parklets in the County Health Department checklist. Parklets increased significantly as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, which have proven efficient and desirable in many areas. At the outset, their construction was not heavily regulated and there were no specific building code requirements for inspection and cleaning under floors. As these facilities have become permanent, building permit requirements have increased. Problem areas identified in our investigation are:

1. Open floor segments can permit food and other waste falling under the floor of the parklet to the street;

2. Many have open side(s) permitting vermin to go under the parklet to feed on scraps;

3. Street drainage (from road crown and gutter flow) can exacerbate the problems of waste under the floor, including leaves and other refuse.

METHODOLOGY
The Jurors made several site visits over a period of eight months and took photographs. The Grand Jury conducted interviews with some officials of some cities and with several San Mateo County officials including the Health Department and Vector Control. A survey was sent to each city/town in San Mateo County.

FINDINGS
F1: Sanitary conditions of the exterior of restaurant facilities fall outside current inspections of the County Health Department. The varying unsatisfactory conditions in the waste removal areas of the facilities shows something is lacking in the regulatory process.

F2: Sanitary conditions of parklets fall outside of current inspections by the County Health Department or Vector Control.

F3: Sanitary conditions of exterior areas used for waste storage and disposal fall outside current inspections by local jurisdictions; local jurisdictions are, by and large, only reactive to an actual complaint.

F4: Most restaurant exterior areas are “out of sight” of the public and as a result complaints are less frequent.

F5. Because they lack oversight, unacceptable conditions in restaurant trash areas are likely not to be rectified.

F6. Waste water from the cleaning of trash areas and from rain flow into the storm drain systems.

5.a
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 7 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury
F7. Effective inspection of parklet sanitation can be severely hampered by closed skirting and lack of under floor access. Spacing between planking and lack of solid flooring can lead to accumulation of organic debris and possible infestation by vermin.

RECOMMENDATIONS
R1. By June 30, 2025, the County should amend its Food Facility Checklist to include the condition of trash area flooring, bins, dumpsters and enclosures, and note any needed repair, replacement or cleaning.

R2. By June 30, 2025, the County should amend its Food Facility Checklist to include the entire exterior waste storage area, retention areas and parklets, including flooring and underfloor areas.

R3. By June 30, 2025, the County should require operators/owners of restaurants to have a written diagram of their approved waste storage/retention area posted so the inspector can evaluate the condition of the facilities.

R4. By June 30, 2025, inspectors for all jurisdictions with restaurants should be empowered to require owners/operators to add receptacles or increase the frequency of pick-ups.

Note: The Grand Jury is not able to recommend changes to building codes or planning criteria to cities or the County. However, in our review we did find the City of Palo Alto has a publication with clear and comprehensive regulations/recommendations for these areas. “Comprehensive Guidelines for Commercial Trash Enclosures:
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/planning-amp-development-services/paloalto-trash-enclosure-area-guidelines-march-2017.pdf”

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE
Pursuant to Penal Code Section 933.05, the Grand Jury requests responses as follows:

From the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, to all Findings and Recommendations.

From the councils for all 20 cities and towns in the County, to Findings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 and Recommendation 4.

The governing bodies indicated above should be aware that the comment or response of each governing body must be conducted subject to the notice, agenda, and open meeting requirements of the Brown Act.

5.a
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 8 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury

RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS
California Penal Code Section 933.05 provides (emphasis added):
(a) For purposes of each subdivision (b) of Section 933, as to each grand jury finding, the responding person or entity shall report one of the following:
(1) The respondent agrees with the finding.
(2) The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding; in which case the response shall specify the port of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons, therefore.
(b) For purposes of subdivision (b) of Section 933, as to each grand jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall report one of the following actions:
(1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action.
(2) The recommendation has not been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a timeframe for implementation.
(3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a timeframe for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This timeframe shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the grand jury report.
(4) The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation, therefore.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
California Health and Safety Code:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codesTOCSelected.xhtml?tocCode=HSC&tocTitle=+Heal th+and+Safety+Code+-+HSC
The following is a representative selection of Municipal Codes relevant to the investigation:
● Daly City:
https://library.municode.com/ca/daly_city/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT8HES A
● Belmont:
https://library.municode.com/ca/belmont/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=CICO_CH1 1HESA
● Hillsborough:
https://library.municode.com/ca/hillsborough/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT8H ESA
● San Mateo (City): https://law.cityofsanmateo.org/us/ca/cities/san-mateo/code/7 ● East Palo Alto Code Enforcement: https://www.cityofepa.org/building/page/codeenforcement

5.a
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 9 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury
● San Carlos:
https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/SanCarlos/#!/SanCarlos08/SanCarlos0827.html#8. 27 ● South San Francisco:
https://library.qcode.us/lib/south_san_francisco_ca/pub/municipal_code/item/title_8- chapter_8_16 and
https://library.qcode.us/lib/south_san_francisco_ca/pub/municipal_code/item/title_8 ● Burlingame: https://library.qcode.us/lib/burlingame_ca/pub/municipal_code/item/title_8 ● Pacifica Food Establishments:
https://library.municode.com/ca/pacifica/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT6SAHE _CH5GACORE
● Pacifica Garbage:
https://library.municode.com/ca/pacifica/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT6SAHE _CH5GACORE_ART1GACO
● Redwood City: RWC has multiple segments of their code that would apply to this topic.

The link to the Code in General is:
https://library.municode.com/ca/redwood_city/codes/city_code?nodeId=REDWOOD_C

ALIFORNIAMUCO

5.a
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 10 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury

APPENDIX A
Photographs of exteriors
Figure 1: San Mateo, September 2023
Figure 2: Millbrae, September 2023

5.a
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 11 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury
Figure 3: Millbrae, September 2023
Figure 4: Millbrae, September 2023

5.a
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 12 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury
Figure 5: Millbrae, September 2023
Figure 6: Millbrae, September 2023

5.a
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 13 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury
Figure 7: San Carlos, December 2023
Figure 8: San Carlos, November 2023

5.a
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 14 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury
Figure 9: San Carlos, December 2023
Figure 11: San Carlos, October 2023

5.a
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 15 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury

APPENDIX B
Survey

1. Please list your name, title or job description and the city/town you represent.

Surveys were sent to managers of the twenty cities and towns in San Mateo County.

Responses were as follows:

City/Town Response Received
Atherton No
Belmont Yes
Brisbane No
Burlingame Yes
Colma No
Daly City Yes
East Palo Alto Yes
Foster City Yes
Half Moon Bay No
Hillsborough Yes
Menlo Park Yes
Millbrae No
Pacifica Yes
Portola Valley No
Redwood City Yes
San Bruno Yes
San Carlos Yes
San Mateo No
South San Francisco Yes
Woodside Yes

5.a
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 16 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury

2. What sanitation standards are applied to the garbage/trash areas of restaurants, bars and food services?
Respondents cited the County ordinance code and various municipal codes and standards. One entity had no response and another responded their city/town has no restaurants.

3. What standards are applied to sanitation, trash and street cleaning related to the "parklets" or other outdoor areas used for food service? Most respondents cited state, county or municipal standards. One city noted they have specific regulations for parklets. Another city said they have no standards because parklets are the responsibility of restaurants.

4. What department(s) of the City enforce these standards? Enforcement of standards may be done by:
● County Health
● Building/Fire/Public Works
● Planning & Building, Dept of Water & Wastewater Resources ● Planning
● Public Works
● Police, Code Enforcement
● Engineering Division
● Community & Economic Development. Department

5. Are regular inspections made or is inquiry only made upon complaint? Most responded inspections are complaint-based. A few municipalities conduct regular, periodic inspections.

6. Upon inquiry by the City (either by inspection or complaint) what standards are applied to determination of a violation, or recommendation to an owner? Standards listed included:
● County Health
● Parklet Standards
● Municipal Codes
● California Building Code, California Fire Code, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

5.a
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 17 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury

7. What agencies or organizations outside of the City are involved in maintaining standards, such as Recology, Republic Services or South San Francisco Scavenger? ● Recology
● Recology of the Coast
● Greenwaste Recovery
● Republic
● County Health
● No response, but noted there is a city contract with a power washing service and that information is made available to parklet owners

5.a
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 18 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury

APPENDIX C
California Health & Safety Code Article 4
Health and Safety Code - HSC, DIVISION 104. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH [106500 - 119406] , PART 7. CALIFORNIA RETAIL FOOD CODE [113700 - 114437] , CHAPTER 7.

Water, Plumbing, and Waste [114189 - 114245.7]
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&division=104. &title=&part=7.&chapter=7.&article=4
ARTICLE 4. REFUSE
114244.
(a) Each food facility shall be provided with any facilities and equipment necessary to store or dispose of all waste material.
(b) Waste receptacles shall be provided for use by consumers. (c) A receptacle shall be provided in each area of the food facility or premises where refuse is generated or commonly discarded, or where recyclables or returnables are placed.
114245
(a) An area designated for refuse, recyclables, returnables, and a redeeming machine for recyclables or returnables shall be located so that it is separate from food, equipment, utensils, linens, and single-service and single-use articles and a public health hazard or nuisance is not created.
(b) Receptacles and waste handling units for refuse, recyclables, and returnables shall not be located so as to create a public health hazard or nuisance or interfere with the cleaning of adjacent space.
114245.1
(a) All refuse, recyclables, and returnables shall be kept in nonabsorbent, durable, cleanable, leakproof, and rodent proof containers and shall be contained so as to minimize odor and insect development by covering with close-fitting lids or placement in a disposable bag that is impervious to moisture and then sealed. (b) Refuse containers inside a food facility need not be covered during periods of operation.
(c) All refuse shall be removed and disposed of in a sanitary manner as frequently as may be necessary to prevent the creation of a nuisance. (d) Storage areas, enclosures, and receptacles for refuse, recyclables, and returnables shall be maintained in good repair.
(e) Refuse, recyclables, and returnables shall be removed from the premises at a frequency that will minimize the development of objectionable odors and other conditions that attract or harbor insects and rodents.
114245.2. Cardboard or other packaging material that does not contain food residues and that is awaiting regularly scheduled delivery to a recycling or disposal site may be

5.a
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 19 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury
stored outside without being in a covered receptacle if it is stored so that it does not create a rodent harborage problem.
114245.3. If located within the food facility, a storage area for refuse, recyclables, and returnables shall meet the requirements for floors, walls, ceilings, and vermin exclusion as specified in this part.
114245.4. If provided, an outdoor storage area or enclosure used for refuse, recyclables, and returnables shall be constructed of nonabsorbent material such as concrete or asphalt and shall be easily cleanable, durable, and sloped to drain. 114245.5. Receptacles and waste handling units for refuse and recyclables shall be installed so that accumulation of debris and insect and rodent attraction and harborage are minimized and effective cleaning is facilitated around and, if the unit is not installed flush with the base pad, under the unit.
114245.6.
(a) Receptacles and waste handling units for refuse, recyclables, and returnables shall be thoroughly cleaned in a way that does not contaminate food, equipment, utensils, linens, or single-service and single-use articles, and wastewater shall be disposed of as specified under Section 114241.
(b) Soiled receptacles and waste handling units for refuse, recyclables, and returnables shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to prevent them from developing a buildup of soil or becoming attractants for insects and rodents. 114245.7.
(a) Except as specified in subdivision (b), suitable cleaning implements and supplies such as high-pressure pumps, hot water, steam, and detergent shall be provided as necessary for effective cleaning of receptacles and waste handling units for refuse, recyclables, and returnables.
(b) If approved, off-premises-based cleaning services may be used if on-premises cleaning implements and supplies are not provided.

5.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 20 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury

APPENDIX D
San Mateo County Inspection Checklist
https://www.smchealth.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/297097foodestab.pdf Environmental Health
Services Food Program
2000 Alameda
de las Pulgas
Suite #100
San Mateo,
CA 94403
(650) 372-6200 FAX
(650) 627-8244
smchealth.org/food

FOOD FACILITY CHECKLIST
The goal of food safety is to promote health and prevent food-borne disease through education, training and regulation. This checklist reflects areas that are evaluated during a routine inspection. Use this as a guide to improve your facility’s sanitation and compliance with the requirements from the California Retail Food Code.

FOOD RECEIVING YES NO N/A
Raw or frozen raw molluscan shellfish (e.g. clams, mussels, scallops, oysters) properly labeled and labels maintained on site for at least 90 days.

Temperature of live molluscan shellfish at or below 45ºF.

Food only from approved sources.

Potentially hazardous foods delivered at a temperature of 41°F Frozen foods delivered in frozen condition with no evidence of thawing or refreezing.

Food at improper temperature or in unacceptable condition rejected.

Foods, especially refrigerated and frozen foods, placed in proper storage locations promptly.

FOOD STORAGE YES NO N/A
Foods protected from contamination, dirt, vermin, insects, chemicals, etc.

Prepackaged and bulk foods properly labeled.

Food stored at least 6 inches above floor in approved locations within the facility.

Returned and damaged goods stored separate from other items.

Raw meat and fish inside refrigerators and freezers stored below and away from ready-to-eat foods (e.g. salads, produce, beverages).

Foods kept covered while in storage.

Food which becomes contaminated or adulterated is discarded.

5.a
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 21 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury

FOOD PREPARATION YES NO N/A
Frozen foods thawed by one of the following methods:
● Under cold running water
● In a refrigerator
● In a microwave
● As part of the cooking process
Hot potentially hazardous foods cooled as quickly as possible by one or more of the following methods prior to placement in a refrigerator or freezer:
● In an ice bath with stirring
● With a rapid cool stirring device
● In a blast chiller
● By adding ice
● In shallow heat conducting pans on ice
● Separating food into smaller or thinner portions

YES NO N/A
Food preparation sinks used only for preparation activities, and not hand washing, janitorial activities, or other uses.

Sulfites not added to potentially hazardous foods.

Potentially hazardous foods shall be thoroughly cooked to a minimum internal temperature of:
● 165°F for poultry, comminuted poultry, game birds, stuffed meats, stuffed pasta, and reheated foods.
● 157°F for ground beef, other comminuted meats, and foods containing comminuted meat. (Or 155°F for a minimum of 15 seconds)
● 155°F for pork.
● 145°F for eggs, food containing raw eggs, and other cooked potentially hazardous food.

FOOD SERVING YES NO N/A
Prepackaged foods properly labeled with common name, list of ingredients, net weight, name and address of manufacturer, etc.

Uneaten food returned from customer is discarded and not reused or reserved.

Self-serve buffets, salad bars, snack counters, bulk food dispensers, and selfserve units. Provide adequate protection for food and utensils from contamination by customers (e.g. sneezing, coughing, and handling).

Tongs, ladles, spoons, etc. used for food service rather than direct contact with hands.

5.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 22 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury

TEMPERATURE CONTROL/THERMOMETERS YES NO N/A
Potentially hazardous foods kept at or below 41°F, or at or above 135°F.

When cooling or heating potentially hazardous foods, the time spent in the DANGER ZONE (41 °F - 135°F) is kept to a minimum.

Easily readable thermometers (accurate to + 2°F) in the warmest part of each refrigeration and freezer unit.

Metal probe-type thermometer on premise if potentially hazardous food served.

Thermometers are sanitized before and after use, and periodically calibrated. (Employees should be able to demonstrate that they know how to calibrate a probe thermometer)

UTENSIL WASHING/STORAGE YES NO N/A
Utensils protected from contamination, dirt, vermin, insects, chemicals, etc.

Multi-service customer utensils (e.g. plates, glasses, silverware) sanitized by mechanical dish machine as per manufacturer specifications, or if manually washed, sanitized by one of the following methods:
● 100 ppm chlorine for 30 seconds
● 25 ppm iodine for 60 seconds
● 200 ppm quaternary ammonium for 60 seconds
● 180°F water for 30 seconds
Test strips or thermometer available for measuring the method of sanitizing utensils.

YES NO N/A
Three- compartment sink with dual integral drain boards available for utensil washing (except where 2 compartment exemptions is applicable).

Compartments are large enough to accommodate the largest utensil in use.

Utensils are clean and in good repair.

Kitchen and serving utensils are routinely cleaned and sanitized.

Utensils are commercial-grade and meet applicable National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) at CAL CODE standards.

All mechanical dishwashers are provided with dual integral drain boards.

Proper sanitizer and chemical levels, and temperature maintained at all times during operation of dish machines.

Single-service customer utensils used only once and disposed of in a sanitary manner.

Serving utensils (e.g. scoops, spoons, ladles, etc.) for potentially hazardous foods, while in use are kept at or below 41°F or above 135°F, or in a dipper well continually provided with clean water.

TOILET FACILITIES YES NO N/A
Employee toilet facilities provided.

Customer toilet facilities provided where required.

5.a
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 23 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury
Tight-fitting self-closing doors provided.

Food, utensils, equipment, supplies, etc., not stored in toilet facilities.

Toilet paper, single-use sanitary towels (or air dryer) and hand cleanser provided from approved dispensers.

Hot and cold water, under pressure, provided from a mixing faucet (or combination faucet) at hand sink.

Ventilation provided.

HANDWASHING FACILITIES YES NO N/A
Within or adjacent to restrooms and kitchens.

Provided with single service sanitary towels (or air dryers) and hand cleanser from and approved dispensers.

Hot and cold water, under pressure, provided from a mixing faucet (or combination faucet) at hand sink.

Kept readily accessible at all times
Facilities provided exclusively for hand washing in food prep areas that are sufficient
in number and conveniently located. (construction/remodels on or after January 1, 1996)

CHEMICALS/PESTICIDES YES NO N/A
Properly labeled.

Stored away from food and utensils. Stored in separate enclosure if stored in food preparation area.

Pesticides specifically approved for use within food facilities.

Chemicals, pesticides, hazardous materials properly used. MSDS data available for employees.

JANITORIAL FACILITIES YES NO N/A
Area provided for storage of cleaning supplies and equipment which is separate from food preparation, food storage, utensil cleaning, and utensil storage areas.

Janitorial sink or basin provided with hot and cold water.

Backflow prevention device provided for sink.

Cleaning equipment (e.g. mops, buckets, brooms, etc.) kept away from food and utensils.

LIGHTING YES NO N/A
Minimum intensity of 20 foot-candles (ftc) in food preparation and utensil cleaning areas.

Minimum intensity of 10ftc elsewhere but intensity of at least 20 ftc available during cleaning operations.

Shatter-proof light covers in food preparation, food storage (except where food is in unopened, original containers), and utensil cleaning areas.

5.a
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 24 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury

VERMIN/INSECTS YES NO N/A
Facility free of rodents and insects.

Harborage and entrances eliminated. Droppings and dead insects cleaned up.

Facility kept fully enclosed. Entrances protected by tight-fitting, self-closing doors or air curtains. Openable windows protected by screens.

Pest control performed by licensed pest control operator.

GARBAGE/REFUSE DISPOSAL YES NO N/A
Facilities provided for garbage disposal and storage.

Containers are leak proof and rodent proof with tight-fitting lids.

Garbage placed in securely fastened plastic bags before placement in dumpster.

Garbage removed frequently.

WATER SUPPLY YES NO N/A
Water supply from an approved source.

Hot and cold water provided in adequate amounts.

EMPLOYEE HABITS YES NO N/A
Employees wash hands before beginning work, between working with raw food and ready-to- eat foods, after coughing or sneezing, after touching soiled equipment or utensils, after using restrooms, and after engaging in any other activity that contaminates the hands.

Employees wear clean garments or uniforms.

Employees do not use tobacco products where food is prepared, served, or stored, or where utensils are cleaned or stored.

Employees do not work if ill.

Employees have been instructed in safe food handling practices.

Employees routinely check temperatures of potentially hazardous foods during storage, preparation and serving, and check utensil cleaning chemical levels, water temperatures, and water pressures.

EMPLOYEE CHANGE/STORAGE FACILITIES YES NO N/A
Area provided for employee changing which is separate from toilets, food storage, food preparation, utensil cleaning, and utensil storage areas.

PLUMBING YES NO N/A
All sewage and wastewater disposed of to an approved sewer or septic system.

Indirect waste drainage via a floor sink or funnel drain provided for all equipment that discharges wastes (e.g. prep sinks, utensil sinks, steam tables, salad bars, Chinese ranges, ice machines, ice storage bins, beverage machines, steamjacketed kettles, display cases, refrigeration/freezer units, etc.) Indirect waste receptacles readily accessible for cleaning and inspection, and not located inside cabinets.

5.a
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 25 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury
Floor drains absent from food storage areas.

Plumbing kept clean, fully operative, and in good repair.

Grease interceptors and septic tanks regularly cleaned out by licensed plumbers.

EQUIPMENT YES NO N/A
Equipment clean and in good repair.

Equipment easily cleanable and meets applicable NSF and the California Retail Food Code standards.

Unused equipment removed from premises.

Approved ventilation/exhaust equipment provided over cooking equipment and high temperature dish machines.

WALLS, FLOORS, CEILINGS YES NO N/A
Floors are smooth, durable, non-absorbent, and easily cleanable in areas where:
● food prepared, packaged, or stored;
● where utensils are cleaned or stored;
● where garbage is stored;
● where janitorial facilities are located;
● in toilet and hand washing facilities;
● in employee change and storage areas.

Floor material extends up the walls and toe kicks at least 4 inches with a minimum of 3/8 inch radius at the wall/floor and wall/toe-kick junctures in all areas mentioned above except where exempted (e.g. where foods are stored in their unopened original containers.

Walls and ceilings smooth must be durable, non-absorbent, and easily cleanable in all areas except where exempted (e.g. dining areas, closed food storage areas, and certain portions of bar areas).

Walls and ceiling finishes light colored in food preparation, utensil cleaning areas, and inside walk-in refrigeration units.

SIGNS YES NO N/A
Official Food Placard must be posted and clearly visible at the entrance of facility.

Valid health permit posted in a conspicuous location.

No Smoking signs posted in food preparation, food storage, utensil cleaning, and utensil storage areas.

YES NO N/A
Hand washing signs posted in toilet rooms.

If facility has sit-down dining, Choking First Aid poster placed where it is readily accessible to employees.

5.a
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 26 2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION YES NO N/A
Any construction, remodeling, alterations, and the installation of new equipment must be approved by the Health Department before commencing work.

Applicable building and fire codes are met.

Manager certification/ Food handler certifications are available on site.

Tobacco permit available if applicable
COMMENTS/OBSERVATIONS:

Release Date: July 9, 2024
2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury

5.a
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Attachment A - Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Exteriors (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105

CITY OF PACIFICA
170 Santa Maria Ave. • Pacifica, California 94044
www.cityofpacifica.org
MAYOR
Sue Vaterlaus

MAYOR PRO TEM
Sue Beckmeyer

COUNCIL
Mary Bier
Tygarjas Bigstyck
Christine Boles
Scenic Pacifica
Incorporated Nov. 22, 1957
September 9, 2024
The Honorable Amarra A. Lee
Judge of the Superior Court
c/o Bianca Fasuescu
Hall of Justice
400 County Center; 2nd Floor
Redwood City, CA 94063-1655
Subject: City of Pacifica’s response to the San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury Report – “Restaurant Exteriors: The Neglected Space.”
Dear Judge Lee and Members of the Grand Jury:

Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the above-referenced Civil Grand Jury report filed on July 9, 2024. Pursuant to Penal Code § 933(c), the City of Pacifica’s(“City”) response to the several findings and recommendations contained in the report are provided below. The Pacifica City Council reviewed and approved the responses at a public meeting on September 9, 2024.

Responses to Civil Grand Jury Findings:

F1. Sanitary conditions of the exterior of restaurant facilities fall outside current inspections of the County Health Department. The varying unsatisfactory conditions in the waste removal areas of the facilities shows something is lacking in the regulatory process.

Response to F1. The City agrees with the finding. The San Mateo County Health System Food Facility Checklist provided as Appendix D in the Grand Jury report does not include criteria to evaluate exterior areas during routine inspections.

F2. Sanitary conditions of parklets fall outside of current inspections by the County Health Department or Vector Control.

Response to F2. The City agrees with this finding. The San Mateo County Health System Food Facility Checklist does not include criteria for evaluating sanitary conditions for parklets.

F3. Sanitary conditions of exterior areas used for waste storage and disposal fall outside current inspections by local jurisdictions; local jurisdictions are, by and large, only reactive to an actual complaint.

5.b
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Attachment B - Draft Responce to Civil Grand Jury Report (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 City of Pacifica’s response to the San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury Report – “Restaurant Exteriors: The Neglected Space” | September 9, 2024
2 Response to F3. The City partially agrees with this finding. California Regional Water Quality Control Board – San Francisco Bay Region Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit requires the City to implement an Industrial and Commercial Business Inspection Plan pursuant to Provision C.4.b. The City contracts EOA, Inc. to implement the City’s Business Inspection Plan.

All food facilities, which include restaurants, food service facilities, and mobile food trucks, are inspected once every two years by EOA, Inc. for compliance with San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program (SMCWPPP). EOA, Inc. conducts inspections in accordance with the SMCWPPP Inspection Report Form and schedules follow up inspections if found noncompliant. EOA, Inc. refers to the City for further enforcement action if the business issues with stormwater compliance persist.

The City’s Wastewater Division conducts yearly inspections of all restaurant exteriors, including additional inspections for sites found out of compliance with the Wastewater Division’s Food Service Establishment Report. Inspection criteria includes confirming the grease removal equipment, or interceptors, are easily accessible, settleable solids within the interceptors do not exceed 25%, and grease removal equipment record keeping.

F4. Most restaurant exterior areas are “out of sight” of the public and as a result complaints are less frequent.

Response to F4. The City partially agrees with this finding. Most of the shopping centers restrict public access to the exterior areas of the buildings. The City has few standalone restaurants that maintain individual exterior trash areas (i.e. trash enclosures), most of which are “out of sight.” The City receives few complaints for exterior areas City-wide. The few complaints that the City receives are for locations visible to the public. City staff has found that restaurant exterior areas, even those “out of sight,” are generally compliant and well maintained.

F5. Because they lack oversight, unacceptable conditions in restaurant trash areas are likely not to be rectified.

Response to F5. The City disagrees with this finding. The City’s Code Enforcement Division routinely conducts weekly to biweekly drive-by site inspections to evaluate the exterior conditions of shopping malls and commercial sites. Code Enforcement works closely with Recology of the Coast, the Merchant Association President, and restaurant owners and managers to address issues or concerns regarding proper and timely garbage removal seeking voluntary compliance. Code Enforcement issues verbal warnings to business owners, providing them an opportunity for corrective action prior to an issue of a Notice of Violation (NOV).

The Code Enforcement Division accepts Complaint Referral and Resolution Worksheets from members of the public reporting violations such as unacceptable conditions of trash. Code Enforcement follows the proper corrective action for the issue.

F6. Waste water from the cleaning of trash areas and from rain flow into the storm drain systems.

Response to F6. The City partially agrees with this finding. Newer shopping centers and commercial areas within the City provide restaurants with trash areas that drain directly into the wastewater system. These trash areas often do not exist for older shopping centers.

5.b
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Attachment B - Draft Responce to Civil Grand Jury Report (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 City of Pacifica’s response to the San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury Report – “Restaurant Exteriors: The Neglected Space” | September 9, 2024
3 F7. Effective inspection of parklet sanitation can be severely hampered by closed skirting and lack of under floor access. Spacing between planking and lack of solid flooring can lead to accumulation of organic debris and possible infestation by vermin.

Response to F7. Not applicable: The City of Pacifica is not named in this finding and therefore has no comment.

Responses to Civil Grand Jury Recommendations:

R1. By June 25, 2025, the County should amend its Food Facility Checklist to include the condition of trash area flooring, bins, and dumpsters and enclosures, and note any needed repair, replacement or cleaning.

Response to R1. Not applicable: The City of Pacifica is not named in this recommendation and therefore has no comment.

R2. By June 30, 2025, the County should amend its Food Facility Checklist to include the entire exterior waste storage area, retention areas and parklets, including flooring and underfloor areas.

Response to R2. Not applicable: The City of Pacifica is not named in this recommendation and therefore has no comment.

Response to R3. Not applicable: The City of Pacifica is not named in this recommendation and therefore has no comment.

R4. By June 30, 2025, inspectors for all jurisdictions with restaurants should be empowered to require owners/operators to add receptacles or increased the frequency of pick-ups.

Response to R4. This recommendation has yet to be implemented and will be implemented in the future. As mentioned in the City’s response to Finding 4, the Manor Shopping Center is one of the only commercial areas with reoccurring unacceptable restaurant trash conditions. The smaller businesses operating within the Manor Shopping Center have at least one to two trash pickups a week scheduled with Recology. Depending on the merchant or need, some sites have up to four pickups a week.

The City requires every business to subscribe to a garbage collection service, pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code (PMC) section 6-5.103. The City’s current Garbage Collection ordinance allows for the size, design, and weight of the garbage containers as provided by the franchise agreement between the City and Recology of the Coast, pursuant to PMC section 6-5.104. All garbage containers must be collected by Recology of the Coast at least once a week pursuant to PMC section 6-5.105. The current ordinance does not allow the City the authorization to regulate the size and quantity of garbage containers or to regulate the frequency of pickups beyond once a week.

5.b
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Attachment B - Draft Responce to Civil Grand Jury Report (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 City of Pacifica’s response to the San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury Report – “Restaurant Exteriors: The Neglected Space” | September 9, 2024
4 Required Action: By June, 30, 2025, the City shall amend PMC section 6-5.104 to allow the City to require sites to increase the number of garbage containers and amend PMC section 6-5.105 to allow the City to require sites to increase the frequency of pickups, identified as insufficient by the City.

Sincerely,

KEVIN WOODHOUSE
City Manager
cc: Pacifica City Council

5.b
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Attachment B - Draft Responce to Civil Grand Jury Report (5883 : Adopt Ordinance Revising Section 6-5.103 - Section 6-5.105 TITLE 6. - SANITATION AND HEALTH
CHAPTER 5. - GARBAGE, COLLECTION AND RECYCLING
Article 1. Garbage Collection
Pacifica, California, Code of Ordinances Created: 2024-09-25 13:11:53 [EST] (Supp. No. 56)

Page 1 of 5 ends

Article 1. Garbage Collection
Sec. 6-5.101. Health and sanitation rules.

The Council hereby establishes the provisions set forth in this chapter for the collection and disposal of garbage, rubbish, waste matter, and refuse in the City. (§ 2, Ord. 334-C.S., eff. May 26, 1982, and § 2, Ord. 523-C.S., eff. December 12, 1988) Sec. 6-5.102. Definitions.

For the purposes of this chapter, unless otherwise apparent from the context, certain words and phrases used in this chapter are defined as follows:
(a) "Garbage" shall mean and include all animal and vegetable wastes from kitchens; all household wastes which have been prepared for, or are intended to be used as, food or which have resulted from the preparation of food; every accumulation of animal and vegetable wastes from establishments where foodstuffs intended for human consumption are handled commercially; and bottles, tin cans, and other food containers.
(b) "Refuse" shall mean and include all types of garbage, rubbish, and waste matter, as defined in this section.
(c) "Rubbish" shall mean and include pasteboard boxes; rags; paper; straw; sawdust; packing materials; shavings; boxes; trimmings from lawns, trees, and flower gardens; and similar combustible materials. (d) "Scavenger" shall mean an agent or employee of the City or any person, or the agents or employees thereof, with whom the City shall have duly contracted, as provided in this chapter, to collect, receive, carry, and/or transport garbage, and/or rubbish, and/or waste matter in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
(e) "Waste matter" shall mean and include crockery, bottles, metal vessels, ashes, shells, plaster, and all other similar noncombustible materials.
(f) Repealed.
(§ 2, Ord. 334-C.S., eff. May 26, 1982, as amended by § I, Ord. 500-C.S., eff. February 24, 1988, and §§ 2, 3, Ord. 523-C.S., eff. December 12, 1988)
Sec. 6-5.103. Garbage: Collection services required: Responsibility of owners. (a) The owner of each and every residential unit, and each and every occupied hotel, motel, apartment house, and rooming house, and each and every premises occupied for business, commercial, or industrial use shall subscribe to and pay for refuse collection services as provided in this chapter. (b) The provisions of this section are not intended to prevent an arrangement of, or the continuance of, an existing agreement under which the subscription to and payment for such refuse collection services are made by a tenant or any agent on behalf of an owner. However, such arrangement or future arrangements shall not relieve the owner's obligation as provided in this chapter.

5.c
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Attachment C -Redlines to Title 6_ Chapter 5_Article 1-Garbage_Collection - Code changes to sections 6-5.103 - 6-5.105 (5883 :

Created: 2024-09-25 13:11:53 [EST]
(Supp. No. 56)

Page 2 of 5 ends

(c) The scavenger shall provide with each regular billing information on the more common refuse collection rates, a telephone number for customers to contact the company for service and billing information, and notice that refuse collection service is mandatory in the City and requires new residents to make arrangements for such service within fifteen (15) days after occupancy. The scavenger shall also send out a more detailed notice on all refuse collection rates to all City property owners and tenants once each year. (d) It shall be the responsibility of the owner of each parcel of property occupied for residential, commercial, or industrial use to request the scavenger to initiate refuse collection service as provided in this chapter within fifteen (15) days after the occupancy of any premises required to have refuse collection. If an owner shall fail to request the initiation of refuse collection service as provided in this chapter, the scavenger shall initiate and continue refuse collection service for such premises and bill the owner for such service. (e) Owners who are delinquent in their payment for refuse collection services shall be subject to the penalties set forth in the franchise agreement between the scavenger and the City and the collection provisions of Section 6-5.112 of this chapter.
(f) The company shall establish a process for receiving and acting upon customer complaints. The company shall inform customers of the procedure for filing a complaint and shall provide forms for such purpose. The company shall maintain a record of all customer complaints filed, including the name and address of the customer, a description of the complaint, the time the complaint was received, and the action taken in response to the complaint. The records shall be maintained at the company's office and shall be available for inspection by the City during the company's office hours. (g) The City may require a different size or quantity of waste container(s) than the size or quantity assigned to or selected by the owner, as well as a higher frequency of collection beyond the subscribed or regularly scheduled service, if the volume of garbage, rubbish, or waste exceeds the capacity of the provided container(s) or the frequency of collection is inadequate for the garbage, rubbish or waste generated by the owner. The City shall notify the owner and the company in writing if the City determines that a different size or quantity of waste container(s) or a higher frequency of collection is required. (§ 2, Ord. 344-C.S., eff. May 26, 1982, as amended by §§ 1 and 2, Ord. 380-C.S., eff. December 14, 1983, § 1, Ord. 437-84, eff. January 9, 1985 and § 2, Ord. 523-C.S., eff. December 12, 1988) Sec. 6-5.104. Garbage: Receptacles: Size: Design.

5.c
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Attachment C -Redlines to Title 6_ Chapter 5_Article 1-Garbage_Collection - Code changes to sections 6-5.103 - 6-5.105 (5883 :

Created: 2024-09-25 13:11:53 [EST]
(Supp. No. 56)

Page 3 of 5 ends

Sec. 6-5.106. Garbage: Receptacles: Placement for collection: Time limitations.

All garbage receptacles shall be located in such a place as to be readily accessible for removing and emptying the receptacles in accordance with the provisions of the franchise agreement between the City and the scavenger.

Such receptacles shall not be placed within the limits of any street, road, avenue, way, alley, public place, or other place so as to constitute a nuisance. All garbage receptacles shall be contained within a protected area on the premises, except for a period of twelve (12) hours prior to and twelve (12) hours after the collection day by scavengers.
(§ 2, Ord. 334-C.S., eff. May 26, 1982, as amended by § 2, Ord. 523-C.S., eff. December 12, 1988) Sec. 6-5.107. Refuse: Contracts and franchises for collection and disposal: Conditions.

Council may award a contract or franchise for the collection and disposal of refuse to any person whom the Council believes best qualified and equipped to perform the work of a scavenger. The franchise agreement shall specify the level of collection service, compensation paid to the scavenger, rate review process, insurance requirements, and all other matters related to the collection and disposal of refuse. (§ 2, Ord. 334-C.S., eff. May 26, 1982, as amended by § 2, Ord. 523-C.S., eff. December 12, 1988) Sec. 6-5.108. Refuse: Permits to collect and transport.

It shall be unlawful, except as otherwise provided in this section, for any person to collect, transport, or carry refuse over any street or public place in the City unless such person is an agent or employee of the City acting within the scope of his employment or has been awarded a contract by the City as scavenger. The City Manager, however, with the approval of the Council, may issue permits to transport or carry refuse over streets and public places of the City to the scavenger of any other City or public agency if the Council finds and determines that such permit is in the public interest and will not impair the contractual rights of the scavenger of the City. The City Manager, with the approval of the Council, may also issue permits to any person to collect, transport, or carry rubbish and waste matter, other than garbage, for purposes purely incidental to the conduct of any lawful business within the City, other than the business of collecting, transporting, or carrying refuse. (§ 2, Ord. 334-C.S., eff. May 26, 1982, as amended by § 2, Ord. 523-C.S., eff. December 12, 1988) Sec. 6-5.109. Refuse: Transporting by individuals.

The provisions of this chapter shall not prohibit any individual from transporting such individual's residential rubbish and waste matter, other than garbage, on City streets without obtaining a permit. The spilling of refuse on City streets shall be unlawful.

No person who has incurred substantial expense in reliance upon this section prior to June 11, 1984, shall be prohibited from transporting such person's garbage on City streets. Any person who claims to have incurred such expense shall file a substantiated claim with the City on or before August 10, 1984, or be prohibited from transporting garbage. The City Manager shall determine whether such claim is substantiated and whether substantial expense has been incurred within the meaning of this section. (§ 2, Ord. 334-C.S., eff. May 26, 1982, as amended by § 3, Ord. 380-C.S., eff. December 14, 1983, §§ 1 and 2, Ord. 409-C.S., eff. July 11, 1984, and § 2, Ord. 523-C.S., eff. December 12, 1988)

5.c
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Attachment C -Redlines to Title 6_ Chapter 5_Article 1-Garbage_Collection - Code changes to sections 6-5.103 - 6-5.105 (5883 :

Created: 2024-09-25 13:11:53 [EST]
(Supp. No. 56)

Page 4 of 5 ends

Sec. 6-5.110. Charges for collection: Procedure.

The fee or charge and method of collection which the scavenger may exact from the owner or occupant of any premises for the collection, removal, or disposal of refuse shall be as determined to be reasonable by the Council in accordance with the provisions of the franchise agreement between the City and the scavenger. (§ 2, Ord. 334-C.S., eff. May 26, 1982, as amended by § 4, Ord. 380-C.S., eff. December 14, 1983, and § 2, Ord. 523- C.S., eff. December 12, 1988)
Sec. 6-5.111. Interference with scavengers: Collection by unauthorized persons. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person in any manner to interfere with the collection or disposal of garbage, refuse, or waste matter by any person authorized by license, franchise, or contract to collect or dispose of the same.
(b) Repealed.
(§ 2, Ord. 334-C.S., eff. May 26, 1982, as amended by § II, Ord. 500-C.S., eff. February 24, 1988, and §§ 2, 4, eff.

December 12, 1988)
Sec. 6-5.112. Collection of delinquent accounts.
(a) Delinquent accounts shall be collected solely by the company. The company shall collect delinquent accounts, and penalties thereon, as provided by agreement with the City and as set forth by this section. (b) Delinquent accounts shall not be collected by the City, included with any tax bill or made a lien against property.
(c) The company shall notify all affected property owners of pending delinquent bills in the same manner as tenants are notified prior to the delinquent penalties becoming effective against the owner in order to provide the owner with the opportunity of satisfying the delinquent account. If the company has not notified the property owner that a tenant's scavenger bill has become delinquent prior to the penalties becoming effective against the owner, there shall be no penalty assessed to the delinquent billing. (d) A penalty for delinquent charges shall only apply to the charge that is delinquent and not to the two (2) month prepayment security and shall only be assessed once against any one delinquent charge. (e) The two (2) month prepayment security shall only be imposed one time for a delinquent account and not be applied again if the delinquent account remains unpaid. The two (2) month prepayment security shall only be imposed once on an account at any given time. The company may require a reasonable deposit, approved by the City, in lieu of the prepayment penalty.
(f) The company shall be allowed bad debt write-offs up to one (1%) percent of annual rate revenues for delinquent accounts, provided that the company shall be required to demonstrate to the City during the annual rate review process that it first has made reasonable efforts to collect such delinquent accounts, including without limitation sending three (3) written notices to the customers responsible for each delinquency. To the extent this requirement results in an increase in the company's costs associated with billing and collection, the company may submit such costs for the City's review on annual rate applications.

The City may in its discretion allow the company bad debt write-offs of annual rate revenues for delinquent accounts in excess of one (1%) percent, provided that the company shall demonstrate that such write-offs in excess of one (1%) percent are necessary.

5.c
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Attachment C -Redlines to Title 6_ Chapter 5_Article 1-Garbage_Collection - Code changes to sections 6-5.103 - 6-5.105 (5883 :

Created: 2024-09-25 13:11:53 [EST]
(Supp. No. 56)

Page 5 of 5 ends

(§ 2, Ord. 334-C.S., eff. May 26, 1982, as amended by §§ 5 and 6, Ord. 380-C.S., eff. December 14, 1983, § 2, Ord. 437-84, eff. January 9, 1985, § 2, Ord. 523-C.S., eff. December 12, 1988, and § 1, Ord. 716-C.S., eff. July 14, 2004; Ord. No. 761-C.S., § 1, eff. July 9, 2008)

5.c
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Attachment C -Redlines to Title 6_ Chapter 5_Article 1-Garbage_Collection - Code changes to sections 6-5.103 - 6-5.105 (5883 :

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/24/2025
1 SUBJECT:

Resolution approving the City’s 2024 Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the Housing Element of the General Plan and the 2024 Annual Progress Report on Implementation of Other Elements of the General Plan
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Move to adopt a Resolution approving the City’s 2024 Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the Housing Element of the General Plan and the 2024 Annual Progress Report on Implementation of Other Elements of the General Plan, and directing the City Manager to transmit the reports to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI).

STAFF CONTACT:

Samantha Updegrave, Community Development Director
(650) 446-4968
[email protected]
Elizabeth Brooks, MPA, Management Analyst II
(650) 738-7341
[email protected]
Sabina Mora, Contract Planner, Good City Company
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

California Government Code Section 65400 (“Section 65400”) requires cities and counties to submit an Annual Progress Report (APR) on the status and progress of implementation of the Housing Element of the General Plan to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI), formerly known as the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”), by April 1 of each year.

HCD and LCI require jurisdictions to submit the annual APR using a form provided by HCD.

Staff provides data on housing unit production across affordability levels, a listing of development applications received, and provides an update on housing program implementation. Providing a copy of the APR to HCD fulfills a statutory requirement to report certain housing information to the State.

This document does not create or alter policy; it is a reporting document. The following discussion and the attached 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (Exhibit A to the proposed resolution) comply with State law requirements.

The City Council initially adopted the 2023-2031 Housing Element (6th Cycle RHNA) on January 22, 2024. On March 24, 2025, the City Council is considering a revised 2023-2031 6 Packet Pg. 130
Pacifica City Council 2
March 24, 2025
Housing Element which incorporates revisions required to address comments received from HCD. The City posted the revised Housing Element on its website on February 6, 2025, and emailed a link to all individuals and organizations that previously requested notices relating to Housing Element adoption and has met the seven-day public review requirement.

The 2024 APR describes planning activities that were in process during the 2024 calendar year and will contribute to meeting requirements during the 6th Housing Element Cycle (2023 - 2031).

1. Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR)
The Housing Element APR updates HCD on each jurisdiction’s progress in meeting their share of Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) goals as determined by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). The City’s RHNA 6 allocation for the planning period 2023-2031 is 1,892 housing units. This is an increase of 1,479 units or a 358 percent increase, compared to the RHNA 5 allocation. The 2024 APR measures housing production during calendar year 2024 that will be counted towards the Sixth Cycle (2023-2031) RHNA Projection Period. The Projection Period is the timeframe for which the RHNA is calculated and RHNA progress is measured. The Sixth Cycle (2023-2031) Projection Period began on June 30, 2023, and ends on December 31, 2031.

The Draft 2024 APR (Exhibit A to the proposed resolution) describes the City’s accomplishments for calendar year 2024 that contribute toward meeting its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) and Housing Element program objectives. Staff has prepared the Calendar Year 2024 APR in the format prescribed by HCD1. This is the second APR associated with the 2023-2031 Housing Element. The 2024 APR prepared by staff demonstrates the number of housing units for which the City granted planning entitlements (i.e., discretionary approvals), building permits, and certificates of occupancy during the 2024 calendar year.

The Housing Element APR requirements are established by legislation and continue to expand.

In addition to historic requirements to track overall housing unit production and affordability, local jurisdictions are now obligated to include detailed information such as project addresses, permit numbers, dates of completed application submittals, entitlements issued, building permits issued, and building permits finalized between January 1 and December 31 of a given year.

Affordability levels, housing tenure (ownership and rentals), and streamlining applications are also recorded.

The APR is a routine item required by state law to report on housing-related activities in the prior calendar year and is not a policy document guiding housing-related actions to be undertaken by the City. The APR must be considered by the Council at a public meeting where members of the public have an opportunity to provide comments. Members of the public may comment on the APR during public comment as part of consideration of the item. Acceptance of the APR is a routine matter.
1 Staff notes that readability of the Housing Element APR can be challenging. However, the City is required by law to use the prescribed reporting form. 6 Packet Pg. 131
Pacifica City Council 3
March 24, 2025
Staff reports the following observations as compared to the 2023 APR reviewed by Council in terms of housing unit production:
• In 2024, housing unit production, measured by building permits, remained relatively stable at 20 units, a slight decrease from 2023's 24 units. Similarly, 43 Certificates of Occupancy (C/Os) were issued, slightly below the previous year's 48. • In 2024, 40 of the 43 C/Os issued were for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), representing 93 percent of C/Os. ADUs comprised 71 percent of the C/Os that were issued in 2023: 44 units. These ADUs are units categorized as 'SFD - ADU Existing Area,' 'SFD - ADU Detached,' and 'SFD - ADU Attached.'
• The City received applications for 27 ADUs in 2024. Of these, all were approved ministerially. The City issued 16 building permits and 40 C/Os for ADUs in 2024. • The City continues to process applications under the state law known as Senate Bill 9, or SB 9. SB 9 allows for ministerial approval (i.e., no discretionary review) of two residential unit projects and/or urban lot splits of existing lots for projects that meet the qualifying criteria in the law. Five SB 9 applications have been submitted, one of which was approved in 2024. These applications consist of an urban lot split only (4 applications) and combined two residential unit and urban lot split (1 application). • Two housing units were entitled in 2024 through the processing of residential development applications, a figure consistent with typical years, though lower than 2023's unusually high number due to a project with a single large entitlement. The City of Pacifica does not have an entitlement process for ADUs which are processed ministerially.
• In 2024, the City received applications for 397 housing units, a substantial increase from 64 in 2023. This increase is largely due to the following two applications: Pacifica Gateway on Coast Highway, south of Reina del Mar Avenue (APNs 018-140-690, & 018- 140-700) for 225 units, and Sea Cove at 4625 Coast Highway for 117 units.

The APR also highlights other accomplishments and milestones achieved throughout the 2024 reporting period.
2024 Housing Element Program Implementation:
• Initiated regulatory framework development for RHNA sites (Housing Element Program HE-I-1), including 11 actions addressed in a published Draft EIR; Final EIR expected May 2025.
• Advanced ADU development (HE-I-4) and as a result increased ADU production through support of ADU Resource Center, including the upcoming launch of an online plans gallery, supporting the ADU Accelerator Program, enhancing the ADU OneStop shop, and developing pre-approved 'building permit ready' ADU plans. • Advanced infrastructure capacity improvements (HE-I-13) by including Vallemar/Rockaway projects in 5-Year CIP (design started 2024, construction estimated to start in 2026) and awarding bid for Sharp Park Pedestrian Improvement Project (construction estimated to start in 2025).

Future Focus: Key Housing Element Implementation Projects • Implement a clean-up ordinance to ensure compliance with state and local laws (HE-I6 Packet Pg. 132
Pacifica City Council 4
March 24, 2025
14).
• Undertake a citywide zoning code modernization to remove barriers to housing development and align with the 2040 General Plan (HE-I-2). • Commission a study to revise the Below Market Rate program to increase the production of deeper affordable housing (HE-I-6).

1. Other General Plan Elements
The General Plan APR updates the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI) on each jurisdiction’s progress implementing their General Plan. Staff has also conducted a review of the City’s General Plan and prepared a report outlining notable items related to implementation on elements other than the Housing Element (Exhibit B to the proposed resolution). This is the third annual report on the 2040 General Plan which was adopted by the City Council in July 2022 to comprehensively update the General Plan (except the Housing Element).

A few highlights from the report are provided below:

Economic Sustainability Element
ES-I-16: “Shop Pacifica” Campaign. Create a “Shop Pacifica” campaign to support local businesses and decrease retail sales leakage.

City economic development staff continues to implement the “Shop Pacifica” campaign that includes local gift cards used for purchases at participating businesses located within the City of Pacifica. The City economic development staff expanded the “Shop Pacifica” e-gift program to nearly 60 participating businesses, with more than 3,700 e-gift cards distributed (including the City investment in bonus cards valued at $25,000.) This program injected an additional $139,000 into the local economy, benefitting a diverse range of local businesses. With marketing costs at just $1,867, the program's success is measured at 133,798% ROI. Shop Pacifica’s impact on the local economy's reflected by ongoing merchant registrations and a multitude shopping options for consumers, contributing to the vibrancy of Pacifica's businesses and injecting local dollars back into the community.

Land Use Element
LU-I-1: Zoning Consistency. Update the Zoning Ordinance and zoning map and apply zoning to all land within the City, consistent with General Plan and LCLUP policies and land use designations.

In December 2024, staff released the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Targeted General Plan Amendments, Rezoning, and Objective Design Standards Program, thus starting the work of updating the Zoning Ordinance for consistency with the General Plan and adopted Housing Element.

Circulation Element
CU-I-31: Neighborhood Bikeways. Develop a system of bikeways connecting all neighborhoods to the City’s north-south pathway consistent with the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.

The Esplanade and Palmetto Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project was approved by Planning Commission and City Council in 2024 and will install new and improve existing Class 2 and Class 3 bike lanes along Palmetto Avenue, West Avalon Drive, and Esplanade Avenue. The project will also enhance pedestrian safety by installing quick-build painted bulbout safety zones at pedestrian crossings, curb ramps, high visibility crosswalks, and rectangular rapid flashing 6 Packet Pg. 133
Pacifica City Council 5
March 24, 2025
beacons at several intersections.

Open Space and Community Facilities Element
OC-I-4 Emphasize Park Maintenance and Improvements. Enhance existing parks to improve the quality and usability of Pacifica’s park land, and make improvements such that park facilities are equitably distributed throughout Pacifica.

Parks, Beaches, and Recreation staff continue to implement the playground equipment replacement project. In 2024, they replaced the infield at Sanchez Park, modernized and replaced the backstops at Fairway Park Baseball Fields. In addition, Parks, Beaches, and Recreation staff continue to work with a consultant to prepare construction drawings for another playground initiative, known as Priority Parks, where 4 playgrounds will receive an extensive complete facility renovation.

OC-I-58: Civic Center. Continue to study the feasibility of developing a new City Hall or Civic Center to provide adequate space for long-term needs and enhance the City’s image.

The City completed construction on a substantial renovation to the Civic Center at Santa Maria Avenue and Francisco Boulevard. The project added a new elevator tower to enhance ADA access, restored the exterior to wood siding that matches its original design, and remodeled the interior floorplan of the City Hall building. The project also substantially renovated the interior and exterior of the Community Development and Engineering Building. City staff moved back into the buildings in July 2024.

Conservation Element
CO-I-54: Climate Action Plan for Greenhouse Gas Reductions. Maintain and update the Climate Action Plan that focuses on feasible actions the City can take to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from government, businesses, and residents in Pacifica.

In May 2023, the City Council established the Climate Action and Adaptation Task Force through Resolution No. 50-2023. The Task Force was created to develop and draft for Council adoption an update to the City’s Climate Action Plan, now titled the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP).

Since its inception, the CAAP Task Force has met monthly as a public body and has worked extensively in subcommittees. Members have also participated in key regional and state-level climate action groups, including San Mateo County’s Regionally Integrated Climate Action Planning Suite (RICAPS), the CA Climate and Energy Collaborative’s Local Energy Resources Network (LERN), and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability USA. The Task Force has conducted widespread community engagement efforts, including community-wide surveys, targeted focus groups, and interactive public outreach at local events. The planning process involved residents, community groups, City staff, Task Force members, and consultants.

The Task Force is drafting the CAAP that outlines strategies for reducing emissions in three broad areas: energy, water, and solid waste; transportation and land use; and food and consumption. It provides key actions necessary for Pacifica to achieve its climate goals, addressing both municipal operations and ways residents, organizations, and businesses can contribute to emission reductions. The final version of the plan is expected to be prepared for formal adoption by the City Council in late spring 2025.

CO-I-71: Inclusive Engagement. Expand notification efforts for major policy documents and projects within Pacifica’s Coastal Zone to unrepresented communities outside of Pacifica.

Planning staff conducted 9 public meetings in 2024 to engage the community on the City’s Local 6 Packet Pg. 134
Pacifica City Council 6
March 24, 2025
Coastal Land Use Plan (LCLUP). These public meetings ranged from an all-day, in-person community question and answer study session (March 2, 2024), to numerous public hearings with the City Council to revise policy language proposed by community members and agencies such as the North Coast County Water District and the California Coastal Commission. Through the City’s extensive community engagement and outreach, the City Council reached a majority agreement on October 28, 2024, and adopted a revised LCLUP that addresses many community members concerns raised over the course of the year. The City’s adopted LCLUP is currently pending California Coastal Commission’s certification and is expected to go to a hearing in spring 2025.

Also see CO-I-54 above for additional discussion of community engagement.

Safety Element
SA-I-99: Multi-Jurisdictional Approach. Participate in State or regional efforts to develop a clear legislative and regulatory framework to manage the wildland-urban interface, including implementation of the MJ-LHMP.

In 2024, nine jurisdictions in San Mateo County formed the Safety Element Collaborative (“Collaborative”) to coordinate updates to their safety elements. Through a competitive RFP process facilitated by San Mateo County, PlaceWorks was selected as the consultant, and Community Planning Collaborative served as the project manager from the Collaborative’s formation through the RFP process and will continue in that role through project completion.

The project team completed a vulnerability assessment and hazard mapping, which included developing a geodatabase of hazard data and mapping, a GIS database of community assets, lists of sensitive populations and critical assets, GIS layers of evacuation constraints analysis results, a vulnerability assessment summary, and an online map viewer. The project remains on track for completion in spring 2025.

2. Next Steps
The City Council should consider whether to accept and approve the APR as prepared by staff and recommend submittal to HCD and OPR to meet statutory requirements.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

This action is not a project as defined in Section 15378(b)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines as approval of the reports is a reporting requirement and will have no direct or indirect impacts on the environment; therefore, no California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental review is required.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

The recommended action to adopt a Resolution approving the City’s 2024 Annual Progress Reports is consistent with state law; therefore, no alternative action is identified.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

The adoption of the Resolution approving the City’s 2024 Annual Progress Reports is consistent with State law and is consistent with the following item(s) in the Council-adopted Strategic Plan and Priority Work Plan for FY 2023-2030:
• Goal 1: Enhance organizational and fiscal stability.
6 Packet Pg. 135
Pacifica City Council 7
March 24, 2025
o Strategy C: Prioritize implementation of the Economic Opportunities Study. • Goal 2: Improve and steward City infrastructure, streets, and facilities • Goal 3: Prioritize protection and development of affordable housing. o Strategy A: Complete the Housing Element Update.
o Strategy C: Prioritize Housing Element program implementation. • Goal 4: Pursue climate change adaptation and mitigation. o Strategy A: Update the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan, including performance measures.
o Strategy C: Update Pacifica’s Local Coastal Land Use Plan and improve communications and collaboration with the California Coastal Commission. • Goal 5: Broaden public communications and collaboration. o Strategy A: Creatively and appropriately leverage community expertise and volunteers to advance City priorities.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact. This is an information item only. However, timely filing of the Housing Element APR is important to retain eligibility for Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) funding under the Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) and Priority Development Area (PDA) grant programs for regional housing technical assistance. The City has two PDAs, the Sharp Park Specific Plan PDA and the Skyline Corridor PDA.

ORIGINATED BY:

Community Development Department
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (PDF) Exhibit B 2024 General Plan Annual Progress Report (PDF) 6 Packet Pg. 136
Pacifica City Council 8
March 24, 2025
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA APPROVING THE CITY’S 2024 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND 2024 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE GENERAL PLAN; AND DIRECTING

THE CITY MANAGER TO TRANSMIT THE REPORTS TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF

LAND USE AND CLIMATE INNOVATION
WHEREAS, California Government Code section 65400(a) requires that planning agencies prepare annual reports on the status of the General Plan progress and its implementation, including an annual report on progress in meeting the City’s share of regional housing needs and local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Government Code section 65583; and
WHEREAS, the housing element portion of the annual report must be prepared using the standards, forms, and definitions adopted by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and must be filed with the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI), formerly the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and HCD annually by April 1st of each year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the annual reports required by Government Code section 65400(a) at a public meeting before the where members of the public were allowed to provide oral testimony and written comments; and WHEREAS, the City has made significant progress in implementing the policies contained in the City’s General Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pacifica as follows:

A. The above recitals are true and correct and material to this Resolution.

B. This action is not a project as defined in Section 15378(b) (2) of the CEQA Guidelines as this is a reporting requirement and will have no direct or indirect impacts on the environment; therefore, no California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental review is required.

C. The City Council hereby approves the City’s 2024 Annual Progress Report regarding implementation of the Housing Element of the General Plan, attached hereto and hereinafter incorporated as Exhibit A, and the 2024 Annual Progress Report regarding implementation of the other Elements of the General Plan, attached hereto and incorporated as Exhibit B.
6 Packet Pg. 137
Pacifica City Council 9
March 24, 2025
D. The City Manager is hereby directed to transmit the two Annual Reports to the HCD and the LCI, in forms provided by the Community Development Director and reviewed by the City Attorney.
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 24th day of March 2025, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
_________________________________
Sue Beckmeyer, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ _________________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 6 Packet Pg. 138
Pacifica City Council 10 March 24, 2025
EXHIBIT A.
2024 HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT
6 Packet Pg. 139
Pacifica City Council 11 March 24, 2025
EXHIBIT B.
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT
6 Packet Pg. 140
Jurisdiction Pacifica
Reporting Year 2024
Housing Element Planning Period 6th Cycle
Current Yea
r
Deed
Restricted
0 Non-Deed
Restricted
7 Deed
Restricted
0 Non-Deed
Restricted
8 Deed
Restricted
0 Non-Deed
Restricted
05 20
Units by Structure Typ
e Entitled Permitted Completed
Single-family Attached 0 0 0
Single-family Detached 2 4 1
2 to 4 units per structure 0 0 2
5+ units per structure 0 0 0
Accessory Dwelling Unit 0 16 40
Mobile/Manufactured Hom
e 00 0
Total 2 20 43
Infill Housing Developments and Infill Units Permitte
d # of Projects Units
11 00
36 397
55000
Income Rental Ownership Total
Ver
y Low 00 0
Lo
w 00 0
Moderat
e 00 0
Above Moderate 00 0
Total 0 0 0
Streamlining Provisions Used - Permitted Units # of Projects Units SB 9
(2021) - Duplex in SF Zone 00
SB 9
(2021) - Residential Lot Split 00
AB 2011 (2022) 00
SB 6
(2022) 00
SB 423
(2023) 00
Ministerial and Discretionary Application
s # of Units
Ministerial 33 54
Discretionar
y 3 343
Density Bonus Applications and Units Permitte
d
Number of Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 1 Number of Units in Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 225 Number of Projects Permitted with a Density Bonus
0 Number of Units in Projects Permitted with a Densit
y Bonus
0 Housing Element Programs Implemented and Sites Rezone d Count
330
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Data is auto-populated based on data entered in Tables A, A2, C, and D Total Housin
g Applications Submitted:

Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received:

Total Housin
g Units Approved:

Total Housing Units Disapproved:

Total Units
Housing Applications Summary
Use of SB 423 Streamlining Provisions - Applications
Note: Units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income Number of SB 423 Streamlining Applications
Above Moderate
Indicated as Infill
Not Indicated as Infill
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Programs Implemented
Sites Rezoned to Accommodate the RHNA
(Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031
Units Constructed - SB 423 Streamlining Permit
s
Number of SB 423 Streamlining Applications Approved
Very Low
Low
Moderate

6.a
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Report - Housing Element and General Jurisdiction Pacifica ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Year 2024 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031
Date Application
Submitted
Total Approved
Units by Project
Total Disapproved
Units by Project Streamlining Application Status Project Type Notes 2 34 67 8 9 11 12 13
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID Unit Category (SFA,SFD,2 to 4,5+,ADU,MH) Tenure
R=RenterO=Owner
Date Application
Submitted
(see instructions)
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed Restricted
Low-Income
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome Total PROPOSED Units by Project Total APPROVED Units by project Total DISAPPROVED Units by Project Please select state streamlining provision/s the application was submitted pursuant to. Did the housing development application seek incentives or concessions pursuant to Government Code section 65915? Were incentives or concessions requested pursuant to Government Code section 65915 approved? Please indicate the status of the application. Is the project considered a ministerial project or discretionary project? Notes+ Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 15 69 14 0 108 191 397 55 0 009-037-470 327 Beaumont Blvd 327 Beaumont 2023-005 SFD O 2/5/2024 1 1 1 NONE No N/A Approved Discretionary 009-037-560 298 Farallon Ave 298 Farallon Ave. ADU 58786-24 ADU R 6/5/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit 009-042-560 140 Paradise Dr. 140 Paradise Dr. ADU 59527-24 ADU R 11/25/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit (Brianne) 009-183-180 4 Hibbert Ct 4 Hibbert Ct ADU 56239-22 ADU O 1/15/2024 1 1 1 0 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial Reviewed and approved by previous sta 009-200-010 416 Heathcliff Ave 416 Heathcliff Ave. ADU 57918-23 ADU R 6/23/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit 009-344-390 407 Heathcliff Dr. 407 Heathcliff Dr. ADU 58313-24 ADU R 2/6/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit 009-422-380 115 Sunshine Dr. 115 Sunshine Dr. ADU 57618-23 ADU R 7/5/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit (Stefanie 009-423-150 249 Gateway Dr. 249 Gateway Dr. ADU 59185-24 ADU R 9/23/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit (Brianne) 009-482-070 12 Brookhaven Ct 12 Brookhaven Ct. ADU 58148-23 ADU R 7/17/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit 009-493-170 167 Beachview Ave. 167 Beachview Ave. ADU 58017-23 ADU R 11/20/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit (Stefanie 009-540-170 467, 455, 451 Gateway Drive 467, 455, 451 Gateway Drive Multifamily ADU 55174-22 ADU R 6/11/2024 3 15 4 22 22 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial Reviewed and approved by previous staf 016-031-030 20 Carmel Ave. 20 Carmel Ave. ADU ACDP 2023-001; CDP-449-23 ADU R 2/27/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Required an Administrative Coastal Development Permit (ADU within the appeals jurisdiction of the coastal zone
016-092-160 917 Paseito Ter. 917 Paseito Ter. ADU 59193-24 ADU R 9/24/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit 016-283-030 016-283-030 358 Ressa Rd. 358 Ressa Rd. SB 9 2024-008; N/A O 8/2/2024 0 0 0 SB 9 (2021) - Residential Lot Split No No Approved Ministerial Existing SFD on the parcel, lot split with no propsed construction of additional dwelling units at this time.
016-355-200 471 Clarendon Dr 471 Clarendon Dr. SB 9 Lot Split (SFR & ADU 58958-24 SFD O 7/7/2023 1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit (Brianne) 018-012-160 219 Seaside Dr. 219 Seaside Dr. ADU 58751-24 ADU R 10/31/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit (Stefanie 018-041-200 268 Lauren Ave 268 Lauren Ave ADU 57308-23 ADU O 4/16/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial 018-061-020 250 Dardenelle Ave 250 Dardenelle Ave. JADU 58625-2 ADU R 4/22/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit 018-113-070 120 Dardenelle Ave 120 Dardenelle Ave. SFD 59449-24 SFD O 11/1/2024 1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit (Brianne) 018-113-490 172 Amapola Ave 172 Amapola Ave. ADU 58758-24 ADU R 5/28/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit (Brianne) 018-140-680, 018-140-690, &018-140-700
East side of Coast Highway, between Reina Del Mar Ave and Rockaway Beach Av SB 330 Pacifica Gateway 2023-024 21: SFD, 22: SFA, 22: 5+, 115: 5+, 45: 5+
R 10/4/2024 45 180 225 Yes N/A Pending Discretionary SB330 Project but this is not an option in Column S 022-150-440 4625 Coast Highway Sea Cove 2023-014 5+ O 4/1/2024 24 93 117 0 0 No Pending Discretionary SB330 Project but this is not an option in Column S. Builders Remed 022-150-470 5 Ohlone Drive 5 Ohlone Drive ADU 59166-24 ADU O 9/19/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial 023-023-100 270 Sterling Ave. 270 Sterling Ave. SB 9 ACDP 2023-010 N/A O 4/22/2024 0 0 0 SB 9 (2021) - Residential Lot Split No No Pending Ministerial SB 9 Residential Lot Split in the Coastal Zone (requiring an Administrative Coastal Development Permit). No proposed construction of new dwelling units 023-037-030 TBD Olympian Way TBD Oddstad Way SB 9 2024-004 2 to 4 O 8/29/2024 2 2 2 SB 9 (2021) - Duplex in SF Zone No No Approved Ministerial For Streamlining also SB 9 (2021) Residential Lot Spl 023-038-380 175 Olympian Way 175 Olympian Way ADU ACDP 2024-007; CDP-459-24 ADU R 9/6/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Required an Administrative Coastal Development Permit (ADU within the appeals jurisdiction of the coastal zone
023-039-110 204 Olympian Way 204 Olympian Way A DU 58628-24 ADU O 4/23/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial023-051-230 689 Montezuma Drive 689 Montezuma Drive ADU 58440-24 ADU O 3/12/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial 023-132-130 1139 Crespi Dr. 1139 Crespi Dr. ADU/JADU 57204-23 ADU R 10/24/2024 2 0 2 2 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit (Stefanie 023-152-360 1031 Zamora Dr 1031 Zamora Dr ADU 58748-24 ADU O 6/4/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial 023-160-050 991 Zamora Drive 991 Zamora Dr ADU 56032-22 ADU O 9/13/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial 023-160-270 1 Hinton Ranch Rd. 1 Hinton Ranch Rd. ADU 59128-24 ADU R 9/9/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit 023-262-060 1456 Serra Dr. 1456 Serra Dr. ADU 59547-24 ADU R 11/27/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit 023-321-040 1341 Linda Mar Blvd 1341 Linda Mar Blvd ADU 58408-24 ADU O 3/1/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial 023-341-030 023-341-300 1627 Higgins Way 1627 Higgins Way SB 9 59317-24 SFD O 10/18/2024 1 1 1 SB 9 (2021) - Residential Lot Spli No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit (Stefanie 023-341-030 023-341-310 1631 Higgins Way 1631 Higgins Way SB 9 59316-24 SFD O 10/18/2024 1 1 1 SB 9 (2021) - Residential Lot Spli No No Approved Ministerial Building Permit (Stefanie 023-582-260 1236 Lerida Way 1236 Lerida Way 56313-22 ADU O 9/9/2024 1 0 1 1 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial Table A
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
1 5
Project Identifier Unit Types Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes Density Bonus Law Applications 10 Housing Development Applications Submitted

6.a
Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Report - Housing Element and General Table A2
23 56
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID Unit Category (SFA,SFD,2 to 4,5+,ADU,MH) Tenure R=Renter O=Owner Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low- Income Deed Restricted Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Entitlement Date Approved # of Units issued Entitlements Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0000002 2
009-037-450 323 Beaumont New SFD 2019-037 SFD O 1 2/18/2020 1 009-037-470 327 Beaumont SFD 2017-033 SFD O 1 3/4/2019 1009-037-560 298 Farallon Ave SFD - ADU Existing Area 58786-24 ADU R 0009-042-560 140 Paradise Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 59527-24 ADU R 0009-054-280 247 Bancroft Way SFD - Remodel/Addition 57544-23 ADU R 0009-058-040 340 Waterford Mixed-use 2020-002 5+ R 5 11/2/2020 5 009-085-430 TBD Farallon SFD RESO 2019-014 SFD O 1 4/15/2019 1 009-183-180 4 Hibbert Ct SFD - ADU Detached 56329-22 ADU R 0 009-200-010 416 Heathcliff Dr SFD - ADU Detached 57918-23 ADU R 0009-212-180 26 Cragmont Ct SFD - ADU Detached 58115-23 ADU R 0009-271-160 324 Milagra Dr 324 Milagra ADU 55426-22 ADU R 0009-344-390 407 Heathcliff Dr SFD - ADU Detached 58313-24 ADU R 0009-422-380 115 Sunshine Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 57618-23 ADU R 0009-423-150 249 Gateway Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 59185-24 ADU R 0009-432-340 251 Edgewood Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 56094-22 ADU R 0009-482-070 12 Brookhaven Ct ADU 58148-23 ADU R 0 009-493-170 167 Beachview Ave SFD - ADU Detached 58017-23 ADU R 0009-540-170 467, 455, 451 Gateway Dr Gateway ADUs 55174-22 ADU R 0016-011-190 1567 Beach Beach Blvd Townhomes RESO 2019-016 5+ O 7 5/6/2019 7016-022-080 184 Paloma Mixed-use 2019-036 SFA O 1 7/6/2020 1016-092-160 917 Paseito Ter SFD - ADU Existing Area 59193-24 ADU R 0016-172-040 600 Loma Vista Ter SFD - ADU Detached 57774-23 ADU R 0016-182-010 2105 Beach Beach Blvd Condos 2018-046 2 to 4 O 2 2/4/2019 2016-182-370 2100 Palmetto Palmetto Mixed-Use Condos 2018-041 2 to 4 O 3 5/6/2019 3016-270-110 715 Talbot 715 Talbot B2022-00775 SFD O 1 3/28/2022 1 016-294-530 120 Birch Ln ADU 52765-20 ADU R 0
016-301-060 131 Brighton Rd MFD - ADU 58880-24 ADU O 0016-304-140 389 Buckingham Way SFD 2019-001 SFD O 1 6/3/2019 1016-351-030 333 Brighton Rd ADU 52645-20 ADU R 0 016-355-190 457 Clarendon MFD - SFD & ADU & JADU 57277-23 2 to 4 O/R 0016-355-200 471 Clarendon SFD - New House 58958-24 SFD O 0 016-400-010 2500 Francisco Mixed-use 2019-035 2 to 4 R 1 2/12/2020 1 018-012-160 219 Seaside Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 58751-24 ADU R 0 018-041-200 268 Lauren Ave SFD - ADU Existing Area 57308-23 ADU R 0 018-061-020 250 Dardenelle Ave SFD - ADU Attached 58625-24 ADU R 0 018-074-060 255 Reichling Ave ADU 52605-20 ADU R 0
018-105-060 220 Hiawatha Ave 220 Hiawatha ADU 55375-22 ADU R 0018-113-070 120 Dardenelle Ave SFD - New House 59449-24 SFD 0018-113-490 172 Amapola Ave SFD - ADU Detached 58758-24 ADU R 0022-052-170, 180,190,250 501 Santa Cruz Terrace new SFD 2020-003 SFD O 1 1/1/2023 1022-056-080 Oddstad Way Lots 4-12 B2021-00160 SFD O 1 8/24/2020 1 022-083-030 801 Fassler Duplexes 2014-004 5+ O 2 2 20 3/19/2018 24 022-150-470 5 Ohlone Dr SFD - ADU Attached 59166-24 ADU R 0 022-150-470 5 Ohlone (Lot 3) Lot 3, Harmony at One Subdivision 56103-22 SFD O 1 4/5/2021 1022-162-220 1027 Anza Dr ADU 57313-23 ADU R 0 022-201-020 1108 Cervantes Way SFD - Remodel/Addition 57997-23 ADU R 0022-205-100 668 Arguello Blvd 668 Arguello ADU 55954-22 ADU R 0022-253-080 796 Serena Dr 796 Serena ADU 55576-22 ADU R 0022-370-220 710 Prairie Creek Dr ADU 52767-20 ADU R 0023-013-010 1300 Danmann Multi 2019-025 5+ R 6 5/4/2020 6023-022-080 1335 Adobe Townhomes RESO 2019-007 5+ O 7 3/4/2019 7023-037-030 TBD Olympian Way TBD Olympian SB9 Lot Split and Two Units 2024-004 SFD O 2 9/16/2024 2 023-039-110 204 Olympian Way ADU B2023-01260 ADU R 1 8/16/2023 1 023-051-230 689 Montezuma Dr SFD - ADU Attached 58440-24 ADU R 0023-064-010 1416 Flores Dr ADU 52437-20 ADU R 0 023-072-010 505 San Pedro Mixed-use RESO 2018-011 2 to 4 R 2 11/5/2018 2 023-132-130 1139 Crespi Dr MFD - 2 ADUs 57204-23 2 to 4 R 0023-152-360 1031 Zamora Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 58748-24 ADU R 0023-160-050 991 Zamora Dr 991 Zamora ADU 56032-22 ADU R 0023-160-270 1 Hinton Ranch Rd SFD - ADU Detached 59128-24 ADU R 0023-182-090 1340 Crespi ADU 51559-13 ADU R 0 023-215-070 1012 Rio Vista Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 56416-23 ADU R 0023-262-060 1456 Serra Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 59547-24 ADU R 0023-301-030 1683 Toledo Ct SFD - ADU Detached 54005-21 ADU R 0023-321-040 1341 Linda Mar Blvd SFD - ADU Attached 58408-24 ADU R 0023-341-080 1693 Higgins Way Urban Lot Split (SB 9), two residential units 2022-005 2 to 4 O 2 1/31/2023 2 023-341-300 1627 Higgins Way SFD - New House 59317-24 SFD 0 023-341-310 1631 Higgins Way SFD - New House 59316-24 SFD 0 023-413-090 1072 View Way SFD - New House 55302-22 SFD O 0 023-422-170 1512 Valdez ADU 50120-18 ADU R 0
023-461-210 1165 Manzanita ADU 51330-19 ADU R 0023-471-060 1185 Manzanita Dr 1185 Manzanita ADU 55670-22 ADU R 0023-582-260 1236 Lerida Way 1236 Lerida ADU 56313-22 ADU R 0023-640-020 1120 Sheila SFD 51378-19 SFD O 0023-672-600 930 Oddstad Blvd. Pacifica School District Workforce Housing Project 2020-009 5+ R 6 5 59 3/20/2023 70023-693-250 1288 Park Pacifica Ave SFD - Remodel/Addition 58903-23 ADU R 0 1 4
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Project Identifier Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement

6.a
Packet Pg. 143
Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Report - Housing Element and General Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 89 Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low- Income Deed Restricted Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Building Permits Date Issued # of Units Issued Building Permits 0 7 0 8 0 0 5 20
009-037-450 323 Beaumont New SFD 0009-037-470 327 Beaumont SFD 0009-037-560 298 Farallon Ave SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 6/5/2024 1009-042-560 140 Paradise Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 11/25/2024 1009-054-280 247 Bancroft Way SFD - Remodel/Addition 1 7/31/2023 1 009-058-040 340 Waterford Mixed-use 0
009-085-430 TBD Farallon SFD 0009-183-180 4 Hibbert Ct SFD - ADU Detached 1 12/16/2022 1 009-200-010 416 Heathcliff Dr SFD - ADU Detached 1 10/16/2023 1 009-212-180 26 Cragmont Ct SFD - ADU Detached 1 12/6/2023 1 009-271-160 324 Milagra Dr 324 Milagra ADU 1 5/2/2022 1 009-344-390 407 Heathcliff Dr SFD - ADU Detached 1 2/6/2024 1009-422-380 115 Sunshine Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 8/15/2023 1009-423-150 249 Gateway Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 9/23/2024 1 009-432-340 251 Edgewood Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 10/6/2022 1 009-482-070 12 Brookhaven Ct ADU 1 12/13/2023 1
009-493-170 167 Beachview Ave SFD - ADU Detached 1 11/7/2023 1 009-540-170 467, 455, 451 Gateway Dr Gateway ADUs 3 15 4 3/11/2022 22016-011-190 1567 Beach Beach Blvd Townhomes 0016-022-080 184 Paloma Mixed-use 0016-092-160 917 Paseito Ter SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 9/24/2024 1 016-172-040 600 Loma Vista Ter SFD - ADU Detached 1 9/12/2023 1016-182-010 2105 Beach Beach Blvd Condos 0016-182-370 2100 Palmetto Palmetto Mixed-Use Condos 0016-270-110 715 Talbot 715 Talbot 0016-294-530 120 Birch Ln ADU 1 8/28/2020 1 016-301-060 131 Brighton Rd MFD - ADU 1 6/28/2024 1016-304-140 389 Buckingham Way SFD 1 3/5/2021 1016-351-030 333 Brighton Rd ADU 1 8/3/2020 1 016-355-190 457 Clarendon MFD - SFD & ADU & JADU 2 1 6/5/2023 3016-355-200 471 Clarendon SFD - New House 1 7/24/2024 1016-400-010 2500 Francisco Mixed-use 0018-012-160 219 Seaside Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 5/24/2024 1 018-041-200 268 Lauren Ave SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 6/9/2023 1018-061-020 250 Dardenelle Ave SFD - ADU Attached 1 4/22/2024 1 018-074-060 255 Reichling Ave ADU 1 7/24/2020 1
018-105-060 220 Hiawatha Ave 220 Hiawatha ADU 1 4/18/2022 1 018-113-070 120 Dardenelle Ave SFD - New House 1 11/1/2024 1018-113-490 172 Amapola Ave SFD - ADU Detached 1 5/28/2024 1022-052-170, 180,190,250 501 Santa Cruz Terrace new SFD 0022-056-080 Oddstad Way Lots 4-12 0022-083-030 801 Fassler Duplexes 2 2 20 4/28/2021 24022-150-470 5 Ohlone Dr SFD - ADU Attached 1 9/19/2024 1022-150-470 5 Ohlone (Lot 3) Lot 3, Harmony at One Subdivision 1 10/10/2022 1022-162-220 1027 Anza Dr ADU 1 6/13/2023 1 022-201-020 1108 Cervantes Way SFD - Remodel/Addition 1 11/1/2023 1022-205-100 668 Arguello Blvd 668 Arguello ADU 1 9/6/2022 1022-253-080 796 Serena Dr 796 Serena ADU 1 6/9/2022 1022-370-220 710 Prairie Creek Dr ADU 1 8/25/2020 1 023-013-010 1300 Danmann Multi 6 6/23/2022 6023-022-080 1335 Adobe Townhomes 0023-037-030 TBD Olympian Way TBD Olympian SB9 Lot Split and Two Units 0 023-039-110 204 Olympian Way ADU 1 4/23/2024 1
023-051-230 689 Montezuma Dr SFD - ADU Attached 1 3/12/2024 1 023-064-010 1416 Flores Dr ADU 1 6/3/2020 1
023-072-010 505 San Pedro Mixed-use 0023-132-130 1139 Crespi Dr MFD - 2 ADUs 2 5/23/2023 2 023-152-360 1031 Zamora Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 5/23/2024 1023-160-050 991 Zamora Dr 991 Zamora ADU 1 9/27/2022 1023-160-270 1 Hinton Ranch Rd SFD - ADU Detached 1 9/9/2024 1023-182-090 1340 Crespi ADU 1 10/10/2019 1 023-215-070 1012 Rio Vista Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 1/12/2023 1023-262-060 1456 Serra Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 11/27/2024 1 023-301-030 1683 Toledo Ct SFD - ADU Detached 1 6/3/2021 1023-321-040 1341 Linda Mar Blvd SFD - ADU Attached 1 3/1/2024 1 023-341-080 1693 Higgins Way Urban Lot Split (SB 9), two residential units 0 023-341-300 1627 Higgins Way SFD - New House 1 10/18/2024 1023-341-310 1631 Higgins Way SFD - New House 1 10/18/2024 1023-413-090 1072 View Way SFD - New House 1 4/4/2022 1023-422-170 1512 Valdez ADU 1 11/6/2018 1 023-461-210 1165 Manzanita ADU 1 9/3/2019 1
023-471-060 1185 Manzanita Dr 1185 Manzanita ADU 1 6/30/2022 1 023-582-260 1236 Lerida Way 1236 Lerida ADU 1 12/5/2022 1023-640-020 1120 Sheila SFD 1 9/11/2019 1023-672-600 930 Oddstad Blvd. Pacifica School District Workforce Housing Project 0023-693-250 1288 Park Pacifica Ave SFD - Remodel/Addition 1 11/30/2023 1 7 Project Identifier Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits

6.a
Packet Pg. 144
Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Report - Housing Element and General Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 11 12
Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low- Income Deed Restricted Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
Date Issued
# of Units issued
Certificates of
Occupancy or
other forms of
readiness
0 10 0 8 0 17 8 43
009-037-450 323 Beaumont New SFD 0009-037-470 327 Beaumont SFD 0009-037-560 298 Farallon Ave SFD - ADU Existing Area 0009-042-560 140 Paradise Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 0009-054-280 247 Bancroft Way SFD - Remodel/Addition 0009-058-040 340 Waterford Mixed-use 0009-085-430 TBD Farallon SFD 0009-183-180 4 Hibbert Ct SFD - ADU Detached 1 1/5/2024 1 009-200-010 416 Heathcliff Dr SFD - ADU Detached 1 6/23/2024 1009-212-180 26 Cragmont Ct SFD - ADU Detached 0009-271-160 324 Milagra Dr 324 Milagra ADU 0009-344-390 407 Heathcliff Dr SFD - ADU Detached 0009-422-380 115 Sunshine Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 7/5/2024 1 009-423-150 249 Gateway Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 0009-432-340 251 Edgewood Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 3/21/2024 1009-482-070 12 Brookhaven Ct ADU 1 7/17/2024 1009-493-170 167 Beachview Ave SFD - ADU Detached 1 11/20/2024 1009-540-170 467, 455, 451 Gateway Dr Gateway ADUs 3 15 4 6/11/2024 22 016-011-190 1567 Beach Beach Blvd Townhomes 0016-022-080 184 Paloma Mixed-use 0016-092-160 917 Paseito Ter SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 3/5/2025 1 016-172-040 600 Loma Vista Ter SFD - ADU Detached 0016-182-010 2105 Beach Beach Blvd Condos 0016-182-370 2100 Palmetto Palmetto Mixed-Use Condos 0016-270-110 715 Talbot 715 Talbot 0016-294-530 120 Birch Ln ADU 0016-301-060 131 Brighton Rd MFD - ADU 0016-304-140 389 Buckingham Way SFD 0016-351-030 333 Brighton Rd ADU 0016-355-190 457 Clarendon MFD - SFD & ADU & JADU 0016-355-200 471 Clarendon SFD - New House 0016-400-010 2500 Francisco Mixed-use 0018-012-160 219 Seaside Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 10/31/2024 1018-041-200 268 Lauren Ave SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 4/16/2024 1018-061-020 250 Dardenelle Ave SFD - ADU Attached 1 5/6/2024 1 018-074-060 255 Reichling Ave ADU 0018-105-060 220 Hiawatha Ave 220 Hiawatha ADU 1 2/20/2025 1018-113-070 120 Dardenelle Ave SFD - New House 0018-113-490 172 Amapola Ave SFD - ADU Detached 0 022-052-170, 180,190,250 501 Santa Cruz Terrace new SFD 0022-056-080 Oddstad Way Lots 4-12 0022-083-030 801 Fassler Duplexes 0022-150-470 5 Ohlone Dr SFD - ADU Attached 0022-150-470 5 Ohlone (Lot 3) Lot 3, Harmony at One Subdivision 0022-162-220 1027 Anza Dr ADU 0022-201-020 1108 Cervantes Way SFD - Remodel/Addition 1 7/3/2024 1 022-205-100 668 Arguello Blvd 668 Arguello ADU 1 3/21/2024 1022-253-080 796 Serena Dr 796 Serena ADU 0022-370-220 710 Prairie Creek Dr ADU 0023-013-010 1300 Danmann Multi 0023-022-080 1335 Adobe Townhomes 0023-037-030 TBD Olympian Way TBD Olympian SB9 Lot Split and Two Units 0023-039-110 204 Olympian Way ADU 0023-051-230 689 Montezuma Dr SFD - ADU Attached 1 11/8/2024 1023-064-010 1416 Flores Dr ADU 1 1/30/2025 1023-072-010 505 San Pedro Mixed-use 0023-132-130 1139 Crespi Dr MFD - 2 ADUs 2 10/24/2024 2023-152-360 1031 Zamora Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 6/4/2024 1023-160-050 991 Zamora Dr 991 Zamora ADU 1 9/13/2024 1023-160-270 1 Hinton Ranch Rd SFD - ADU Detached 0023-182-090 1340 Crespi ADU 0023-215-070 1012 Rio Vista Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 0023-262-060 1456 Serra Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area 1 12/2/2024 1023-301-030 1683 Toledo Ct SFD - ADU Detached 1 10/30/2024 1023-321-040 1341 Linda Mar Blvd SFD - ADU Attached 0023-341-080 1693 Higgins Way Urban Lot Split (SB 9), two residential units 0023-341-300 1627 Higgins Way SFD - New House 0023-341-310 1631 Higgins Way SFD - New House 0023-413-090 1072 View Way SFD - New House 1 3/14/2024 1023-422-170 1512 Valdez ADU 0023-461-210 1165 Manzanita ADU 0023-471-060 1185 Manzanita Dr 1185 Manzanita ADU 1 12/10/2024 1023-582-260 1236 Lerida Way 1236 Lerida ADU 1 9/9/2024 1023-640-020 1120 Sheila SFD 0023-672-600 930 Oddstad Blvd. Pacifica School District Workforce Housing Project 0023-693-250 1288 Park Pacifica Ave SFD - Remodel/Addition 0 Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 10 Project Identifier

6.a
Packet Pg. 145
Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Report - Housing Element and General Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Streamlining Infill
Housing without
Financial Assistance
or Deed Restrictions
Term of
Affordability or
Deed Restriction
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Current APN Street Address Project Name+
How many of the
units were
Extremely Low
Income?
Please select the state
streamlining provision the
project was APPROVED
pursuant to. (may select
multiple)
Infill Units?
Y/N+
Assistance Programs
for Each Development
(may select multiple -
see instructions)
Deed Restriction
Type
(may select multiple -
see instructions)
For units affordable without
financial assistance or deed
restrictions, explain how the
locality determined the units
were affordable
(see instructions)
Term of Affordability or
Deed Restriction (years)
(if affordable in perpetuity
enter 1000)+
Number of
Demolished/De
stroyed Units
Demolished or
Destroyed Units
Demolished/D
estroyed
Units Owner
or Renter
Total Density Bonus Applied to
the Project (Percentage Increase
in Total Allowable Units or Total
Maximum Allowable Residential
Gross Floor Area)
Number of Other Incentives,
Concessions, Waivers, or Other
Modifications Given to the
Project (Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking Reductions)
List the incentives,
concessions, waivers, and
modifications (Excluding
Parking Waivers or Parking
Modifications)
Did the project receive a
reduction or waiver of
parking standards? (Y/N)
0 0
009-037-450 323 Beaumont New SFD NONE Y Area Rental Survey009-037-470 327 Beaumont SFD NONE Y Area Rental Survey009-037-560 298 Farallon Ave SFD - ADU Existing Area Area Rental Survey009-042-560 140 Paradise Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area Area Rental Survey009-054-280 247 Bancroft Way SFD - Remodel/Addition NONE Y Area Rental Survey009-058-040 340 Waterford Mixed-use NONE Y Area Rental Survey009-085-430 TBD Farallon SFD NONE Y Area Rental Survey009-183-180 4 Hibbert Ct SFD - ADU Detached Area Rental Survey009-200-010 416 Heathcliff Dr SFD - ADU Detached NONE Y Area Rental Survey009-212-180 26 Cragmont Ct SFD - ADU Detached NONE Y Area Rental Survey009-271-160 324 Milagra Dr 324 Milagra ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey009-344-390 407 Heathcliff Dr SFD - ADU Detached Area Rental Survey009-422-380 115 Sunshine Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area NONE Y Area Rental Survey009-423-150 249 Gateway Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area Area Rental Survey009-432-340 251 Edgewood Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area Area Rental Survey009-482-070 12 Brookhaven Ct ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey009-493-170 167 Beachview Ave SFD - ADU Detached NONE Y Area Rental Survey009-540-170 467, 455, 451 Gateway Dr Gateway ADUs NONE Y Regulatory agreememt 016-011-190 1567 Beach Beach Blvd Townhomes NONE Y Area Rental Survey016-022-080 184 Paloma Mixed-use NONE Y Area Rental Survey016-092-160 917 Paseito Ter SFD - ADU Existing Area Area Rental Survey016-172-040 600 Loma Vista Ter SFD - ADU Detached NONE Y Area Rental Survey016-182-010 2105 Beach Beach Blvd Condos NONE Y Area Rental Survey016-182-370 2100 Palmetto Palmetto Mixed-Use Condos NONE Y Area Rental Survey016-270-110 715 Talbot 715 Talbot NONE Y Area Rental Survey016-294-530 120 Birch Ln ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey016-301-060 131 Brighton Rd MFD - ADU 016-304-140 389 Buckingham Way SFD NONE Y Area Rental Survey016-351-030 333 Brighton Rd ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey016-355-190 457 Clarendon MFD - SFD & ADU & JADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey016-355-200 471 Clarendon SFD - New House016-400-010 2500 Francisco Mixed-use NONE Y Area Rental Survey018-012-160 219 Seaside Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area Area Rental Survey018-041-200 268 Lauren Ave SFD - ADU Existing Area NONE Y Area Rental Survey018-061-020 250 Dardenelle Ave SFD - ADU Attached Area Rental Survey018-074-060 255 Reichling Ave ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey018-105-060 220 Hiawatha Ave 220 Hiawatha ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey018-113-070 120 Dardenelle Ave SFD - New House018-113-490 172 Amapola Ave SFD - ADU Detached Area Rental Survey022-052-170, 180,190,250 501 Santa Cruz Terrace new SFD NONE Y Area Rental Survey022-056-080 Oddstad Way Lots 4-12 NONE Y Area Rental Survey022-083-030 801 Fassler Duplexes NONE N Other INC Area Rental Survey 45 022-150-470 5 Ohlone Dr SFD - ADU Attached Area Rental Survey022-150-470 5 Ohlone (Lot 3) Lot 3, Harmony at One Subdivision NONE Y Area Rental Survey022-162-220 1027 Anza Dr ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey022-201-020 1108 Cervantes Way SFD - Remodel/Addition NONE Y Area Rental Survey022-205-100 668 Arguello Blvd 668 Arguello ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey022-253-080 796 Serena Dr 796 Serena ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey022-370-220 710 Prairie Creek Dr ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey023-013-010 1300 Danmann Multi NONE Y Area Rental Survey023-022-080 1335 Adobe Townhomes NONE Y Area Rental Survey023-037-030 TBD Olympian Way TBD Olympian SB9 Lot Split and Two Units SB 9 (2021) - Duplex in SF Zone Y023-039-110 204 Olympian Way ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey023-051-230 689 Montezuma Dr SFD - ADU Attached Area Rental Survey023-064-010 1416 Flores Dr ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey023-072-010 505 San Pedro Mixed-use NONE N Area Rental Survey023-132-130 1139 Crespi Dr MFD - 2 ADUs NONE Y Area Rental Survey023-152-360 1031 Zamora Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area Area Rental Survey023-160-050 991 Zamora Dr 991 Zamora ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey023-160-270 1 Hinton Ranch Rd SFD - ADU Detached Area Rental Survey023-182-090 1340 Crespi ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey023-215-070 1012 Rio Vista Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area NONE Y Area Rental Survey023-262-060 1456 Serra Dr SFD - ADU Existing Area Area Rental Survey023-301-030 1683 Toledo Ct SFD - ADU Detached NONE Y Area Rental Survey023-321-040 1341 Linda Mar Blvd SFD - ADU Attached Area Rental Survey023-341-080 1693 Higgins Way Urban Lot Split (SB 9), two residential units SB 9 (2021) - Duplex in SF Zone Y Area Rental Survey 023-341-300 1627 Higgins Way SFD - New House023-341-310 1631 Higgins Way SFD - New House023-413-090 1072 View Way SFD - New House023-422-170 1512 Valdez ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey023-461-210 1165 Manzanita ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey023-471-060 1185 Manzanita Dr 1185 Manzanita ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey023-582-260 1236 Lerida Way 1236 Lerida ADU NONE Y Area Rental Survey023-640-020 1120 Sheila SFD NONE Y Area Rental Survey023-672-600 930 Oddstad Blvd. Pacifica School District Workforce Housing Project NONE Y Other Other Regulatory Agreement023-693-250 1288 Park Pacifica Ave SFD - Remodel/Addition NONE Y Area Rental Survey Housing with Financial
Assistance and/or Deed
Restrictions
Project Identifier Demolished/Destroyed Units Density Bonus

6.a
Packet Pg. 146
Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Report - Housing Element and General Jurisdiction Pacifica ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2024 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element ImplementationPlanning Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031 1 Projection
Period 34
RHNA Allocation
by Income Level
Projection
Period -
06/30/2022-
01/30/2023
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
Total Units
to Date (all
years)
Total Remaining
RHNA by
Income Level
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - 6 7 - - - - - - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - 4 8 - - - - - - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted 15 8 - - - - - - - -
Above Moderate 753 2 5 5 - - - - - - - 12 741
1,892
17 23 20 - - - - - - - 60 1,832
5 67
Extremely lowIncome Need 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Units to Date Total Units Remaining 269 6 - - - - - - - - 6 263
VLI Deed RestrictedVLI Non Deed RestrictedLI Deed RestrictedLI Non Deed RestrictedMI Deed RestrictedMI Non Deed RestrictedAbove Mod Income Please note: The APR form can only display data for one planning period. To view progress for a different planning period, you may login to HCD's online APR system, or contact HCD staff at [email protected]. 268
13 This table is auto-populated once you enter your jurisdiction name and current year data. Past year information comes from previous APRs. 23 Moderate
538 310 291
Please contact HCD if your data is different than the material supplied here 12 2
Table B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress
Permitted Units Issued by Affordability
525 298
Please note: For the last year of the 5th cycle, Table B will only include units that were permitted during the portion of the year that was in the 5th cycle. For the first year of the 6th cycle, Table B will only include units that were permitted since the start of the planning period. Projection Period units are in a separate column.Total RHNATotal Units Income Level
Very LowLowExtremely Low-Income Units*Note: units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income RHNA progress and must be reported as very low-income units in section 7 of Table A2. They must also be reported in the extremely low-income category (section 13) in Table A2 to be counted as progress toward meeting the extremely low-income housing need determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1).*Extremely low-income housing need determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1). Value in Section 5 is default value, assumed to be half of the very low-income RHNA. May be overwritten.

Progress toward extremely low-income housing need, as determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1).

Please Note: Table B does not currently contain data from Table F or Table F2 for prior years. You may login to the APR system to see Table B that contains this data.

6.a
Packet Pg. 147
Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Jurisdiction Pacifica ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2024
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31) Housing Element Implementation
Planning Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031
Date of
Rezone
Rezone
Type
2 4 5 6 7 9 10 11
APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Date of
Rezone
Very LowIncome Low-Income Moderate- Income Above Moderate- Income Rezone Type Parcel Size (Acres) General Plan Designation Zoning Minimum Density Allowed Maximum Density Allowed Realistic Capacity Vacant/Nonvacant Description of Existing Uses 009-245-030 751 Oceana Blvd 751 Oceana Blvd Site #02 5/31/2025 3 3 6 39 Shortfall of Sites 2.5 HDR C-2 30 40 Vacant Vacant018-140-450 4275 Coast Hwy 4275 Coast Hwy Site #10 5/31/2025 49 Shortfall of Sites 1.95 MUN, OSAR C-2 30 60 Non-Vacant Lumberyard, Building Materials
018-140-460 & 018-
140-470
Coast Hwy, Lat:

37.61261° N
Lon: 122.48821° W
Vacant - Coast Hwy Site #11 5/31/2025 34 35 Shortfall of Sites 1.43 MUN C-2 30 60 Vacant Vacant 018-140-700 Coast Hwy, Lat:

37.61120° N
Lon: 122.49048° W
Vacant-Former
Caltrans -
Hwy 1 b/w 4300-
4400 Coast Hwy
Site #12 5/31/2025 84 85 Shortfall of Sites 3.48 MUN C-2/HPD 30 60 Vacant Vacant Land former Caltrans
023-593-070 1055 Terra Nova Blvd Park Mall Site #16A 5/31/2025 17 Shortfall of Sites 0.41 MUN C-1 26 50 Vacant Vacant/Neighborhood Shopping Park Mall
023-593-130 1035 Terra Nova Blvd Park Mall Site #16B 5/31/2025 4 3 37 Shortfall of Sites 2.97 MUN C-1 30 50 Non-Vacant Neighborhood Shopping Park Mall
TBD Linda Mar Blvd/Coast
HWY
Caltrans Park n
Ride -
Across from Linda
Mar SC
Site #18 5/31/2025 26 27 Shortfall of Sites 2.1 MUN N/A 30 60 Non-Vacant Cal Trans Park n Ride (across from Linda Mar
SC)
009-502-290 533 Hickey Blvd Filipino 7th Day
Adventist
Site #19 5/31/2025 15 Shortfall of Sites 1.65 LDR P-D 15 30 Non-Vacant Filipino 7th Day Adventist 009-166-010,009-252-040,
& 009-252-050
104 Avalon Dr,
155 Milagra Dr,
& 151 Milagra Dr
PW Corp Yard Site #20 5/31/2025 25 25 Shortfall of Sites 0.81 Retail Commmercial
C-2 60 Non-Vacant PW Corp Yard
009-293-070 401 Paloma Ave Oceana High
School
Site #21 5/31/2025 7 7 12 152 Shortfall of Sites 51.31 Public & Semi Public
R-1/B-1 40 Non-Vacant Oceana High School
022-310-300 1450 Terra Nova Blvd Terra Nova High
School
Site #22 5/31/2025 5 5 9 110 Shortfall of Sites 43.33 Public & Semi Public
R-1 40 Non-Vacant Terra Nova High School
023-281-130 1220 Linda Mar Blvd Sanchez Art Center Site #23 5/31/2025 65 65 Shortfall of Sites 8.84 Public & Semi Public, Park
A/B-5 40 Non-Vacant Sanchez Art Center
023-593-140 1111 Terra Nova Blvd Sanchez Llibrary Site #24 5/31/2025 37 38 Shortfall of Sites 2.86 Public & Semi Public
C-1 50 Non-Vacant Sanchez Library
009-610-110 Skyline Blvd/HWY 35 Caltrans Skyline
ROW
- Skyline Blvd
Site #25 5/31/2025 82 83 Shortfall of Sites 5.1 N/A N/A 40 Vacant Caltrans Skyline ROW 009-134-130 Palmetto Ave, Manor
Plaza
Pacific Manor SC Site #27A 5/31/2025 1 2 3 31 Shortfall of Sites 0.76 Retail Commercial P/CZ, C-1 60 Non-Vacant Pacific Manor Shoppingparking lot 009-134-150 Palmetto Ave, Manor
Plaza
Pacific Manor SC Site #27B 5/31/2025 2 2 4 45 Shortfall of Sites 1.6 Retail Commercial P/CZ, C-1 60 Non-Vacant Pacific Manor Shoppingparking lot 009-440-110
& 009-440-120
777 Hickey Blvd &
Gateway Dr/Hickey Blvd
Fairmont SC Site #28 5/31/2025 1 2 3 35 Shortfall of Sites 5.5 Retail Commercial P-D 50 Non-Vacant Fairmont Shopping Center, Mall Misc retail
023-041-190,203-041-200,
& 023-041-270
De Solo Dr-adjacent to
1290 & 1312 De Solo &
500 Linda Mar
Linda Mar SC Rear
Parking Lot &
Center
Site #29 5/31/2025 7 7 13 155 Shortfall of Sites 5.22 LDR (3.62 acres) & Retail
Commercial (1.6
acres)
C-1 9 50 Non-Vacant Linda Mar Shopping
Center Rear Parking
023-073-090 520 San Pedro Ave 520 San Pedro Ave Site #30 5/31/2025 12 Shortfall of Sites 0.96 Retail Commercial C-2/CZ 30 Non-Vacant Builders Exchange023-073-100 & 023-073-110
560 San Pedro Ave 560 San Pedro Ave Site #31 5/31/2025 30 Shortfall of Sites 1.24 Retail Commercial C-2/CZ 9 30 Non-Vacant Ace Hardware/surface parking
009-164-200,009-164-210,
& 009-164-220
Oceana Blvd/ Manor Dr,
555 Oceana Blvd,
& 549 Oceana Blvd
Brentwood SC
& Oceana /Manor
Site #32 5/31/2025 48 49 Shortfall of Sites 3.1 Retail Commercial C-1/C-2 60 Non-Vacant RetailInsurance/Taqueria, Brentwood Shopping
Center, Parking, & Older
Buildings
018-140-300
& 018-140-660
1) Coast Hwy
Lat: 37.61049° N
Lon: 122.49173° W
&
2) Coast Hwy
Lat: 37.61015° N
Lon: 122 49174° W
Vacant - Coast Hwy/
San Marlo Eastside
Site #38 5/31/2025 30 31 Shortfall of Sites 1.26 MUN C-1 30 60 Vacant Vacant 017-470-100 730 Sharp Park Rd Latter Day Saints Site A 5/31/2025 52 Shortfall of Sites 4.39 Public & Semi Public
PF+ 40 Non-Vacant Latter Day Saints
009-360-520 2480 Skyline Blvd Ramallah Plaza Site B 5/31/2025 11 Shortfall of Sites 0.46 Retail Commercial C-1 30 Non-Vacant Ramallah Plaza009-058-040 340 Waterford St Vacant - 340 Waterford St
Site D 5/31/2025 6 Shortfall of Sites 0.2 Retail Commercial C-1 40 Vacant Vacant 009-058-030 340 Waterford St Car Wash - 340
Waterford
Site E 5/31/2025 11 Shortfall of Sites 0.33 Retail Commercial C-1 40 Non-Vacant Car Wash 023-593-160 Oddstad Blvd, Lat:

37.58253° N
Lon: 122.47625° W
Oddstad Blvd Site F 5/31/2025 16 Shortfall of Sites 2.33 MUN C-1 30 40 Non-Vacant Mostly Vacant w/ Accessory Structure
009-610-110 Skyline Blvd/Glencourt
Way
Skyline Water Tank Site G 5/31/2025 27 28 Shortfall of Sites 4.46 Utilities P-D 40 Non-Vacant Skyline Water Tank 009-245-020 801 Oceana Blvd Pavillion of Flowers Site H 5/31/2025 42 Shortfall of Sites 1.29 Office Commercial
C-1, O 40 Non-Vacant Pavillion of Flowers,
Flower Shop/Funeral
Home
018-140-220 Coast Hwy, Lat:

37.60960° N
Lon: 122.49114° W
Vacant - Coast Hwy Site I 5/31/2025 36 37 Shortfall of Sites 1.51 LDR R-1/B-3 9 60 Vacant Vacant 018-140-090 4400 Coast Hwy Lutheran Church Site J 5/31/2025 24 25 Shortfall of Sites 2.77 Retail Commercial/HDR
C-1 30 60 Non-Vacant Lutheran Church
Note: "+" indicates an optional fieldCells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
3 8
Project Identifier RHNA Shortfall by Household Income Category Sites Description 1 Sites Identified or Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Need and No Net-Loss Law Table C

6.a
Packet Pg. 148
Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Jurisdiction Pacifica
Reporting Year 2024 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
1 23 4
Name of Program Objective Timeframe in H.E Status of Program Implementation HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to
Achieve RHNA Create the regulatory
framework to accommodate the Regional Housing
Needs Allocation (RHNA) sites inventory, promote
development of multi-family housing, including rental
housing and missing middle housing. Address land
use constraints to make the production of housing
more likely.

Implementing Action 1: Amend General Plan Land Use designations and zoning designations to accommodate the RHNA by June 2024, as shown in Table 4: Sites that Require Rezoning to Meet RHNA Capacity (Housing Element PP. 12-13). 6/1/2024 Implementing Action 1 is in progress. The Draft EIR for the rezoning and general plan and land use designation updates has been published and the Final EIR is in preparation.

The comment period is closed and the Final EIR is estimated to be presented to the City Council by the end of May 2025. The revised housing element, to be considered by City Council in March 2025, includes a revised completion timeline for this implementation action.

HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to
Achieve RHNA
Implementing Action 2: Review the zoning regulations and map to identify inconsistencies between the general plan densities and uses and the currently adopted zoning regulations and amend accordingly to resolve (selected sites on Table 3:

Residential Sites with Existing Capacity, Housing Element PP. 11 ). 12/1/2026 Implementing Action 2 is in progress. The Draft EIR for the rezoning and general plan and land use designation updates has been published and the Final EIR is in preparation.

HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to
Achieve RHNA
Implementing Action 3: Submit an amendment of the Local Coastal Land Use Plan Update to the California Coastal Commission for land use changes proposed for sites 27A, 27B, 30, and 31 by December 2025 to implement actions 1 and 2 in HE-I-1. 12/1/2025 Implementing Action 3 is not started due to pending completion of rezoning and general plan and land use designation updates. This action will be initiated after the updated EIR for general plan amendments have been completed. The revised housing element, to be considered by City Council in March 2025, includes a revised completion timeline for this implementation action.The City cannot submit additional amendments until after its new LCLUP is certified, which is slated for a City Council hearing in May 2025.

HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to
Achieve RHNA
Implementing Action 4: Complete any required CEQA environmental analysis for redesignation and rezoning in program HE-I-1 by June, 2024. 6/1/2024 Implementing Action 4 is in progress. The Draft EIR for the rezoning and general plan and land use designation updates has been published, and the Final EIR is in preparation.

The comment period is closed and the final EIR is estimated to be presented to the City Council by the end of May 2025. The revised housing element, to be considered by City Council in March 2025, includes a revised completion timeline for this implementation action.

HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to
Achieve RHNA
Implementing Action 5: Initiate State of California decertification process for any Caltrans or other State-owned site (sites 18, 25, G), including making an initial deposit of funds (approximately $35,000 in 2022) by December 2024, and designate sites as required. It is anticipated that the City may partner with nonprofit housing developers for these sites.
12/1/2024 Implementing Action 5 has not started. The revised housing element, to be considered by City Council in March 2025, includes a revised completion timeline for this implementation action.

HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to
Achieve RHNA
Implementing Action 6: City Council to evaluate potential of city-owned sites and seek affordable housing developer interest in conformance with any applicable Surplus Land Act requirements. The City will commission a study examining whether any other cityowned sites are appropriate for an RFP for a developer to work collaboratively with the City to try to develop a key site by December 2024, and present recommendations to the City Council by December 2025 with a goal of adoption by December 2026. a. The City will prepare the required detail to commit to completion of the Surplus Land Act (SLA) and other required processes for city-owned sites in conformance with Government Code Article 8 (commencing with Section 54220) of Chapter 5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5. It will also complete coordination with the Pacifica School District an Jefferson Union High School District to complete the SLA process for school districtowned sites, and completion of the decertification process for Caltrans-owned sites withi three years from the start of the planning period.
b. The City will prioritize development of city-owned sites in the RCAA.

RFP by 12/1/2024;
Recommendations to City
Council by 12/1/2025
Implementing Action 6 has not started. The revised housing element, to be considered by City Council in March 2025, includes a revised completion timeline for this implementation action.

HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to
Achieve RHNA
Implementing Action 7: Work collaboratively with owners of public or semi-public sites that have potential for development and identify potential housing developers to facilitate development of the site
Ongoing Implementing Action 7 has not started. The revised housing element, to be considered by City Council in March 2025, includes a revised completion timeline for this implementation action
HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to
Achieve RHNA
Implementing Action 8: Rezone to implement state government code 65583.2 subd. (c) to allow approval of residential developments “by-right” if at least 20 percent of the units are affordable to low income for the two sites identified on multiple housing elements:

Sites 24, 27A, and 27B. Site 24 is the Sanchez Library located at 11 Terra Nova Blvd.

Sites 27A and 27B are in the Pacific Manor Shopping Center located at 440-494 Manor Plaza.
12/1/2026 Implementing Action 8 is in progress. The Draft EIR for the rezoning and general plan and land use designation updates has been published and the Final EIR is in preparation.

HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to
Achieve RHNA
Implementing Action 9: Existing recreational facilities, such as playing fields on public sites to be preserved if possible.

Ongoing Implementing Action 9 has not started. The revised housing element, to be considered by City Council in March 2025, includes a revised completion timeline for this implementation action
HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to
Achieve RHNA
Implementing Action 10: Rezone the following core RHNA sites to 60 dwelling units per acre:
a. Site 10: 4275 Coast Hwy, Lumberyard (49 units, Moderate Income) b. Site 18: Linda Mar Park & Ride (53 units, Lower Income) c. Site 27A: Pacific Manor Shopping Center (37 units, Above Moderate with Below Market Rate Inclusionary)
d. Site 27B: Pacific Manor Shopping Center (53 units, Above Moderate with Below Market Rate Inclusionary)
e. Site 32: Brentwood Shopping Center (97 units, Lower Income 12/1/2026 Implementing Action 10 is in progress. The Draft EIR for the rezoning and general plan and land use designation updates has been published and the Final EIR is in preparation.

HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to
Achieve RHNA
Implementing Action 11: Rezone the following surplus sites to 60 dwelling units per acre:
a. Site 12: Former Caltrans, now private (169 units, Lower Income) 12/1/2026 Implementing Action 11 is in progress. The Draft EIR for the rezoning and general plan and land use designation updates has been published and the Final EIR is in preparation.

HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to
Achieve RHNA
Implementing Action 12: Review, and where appropriate amend, the Zoning Code to establish a By-Right designation for housing sites that propose a minimum of 20% units affordable to lower income to meet the lower income RHNA shortfall, and other requirements in accordance with Government Code 65583 (c) (1) and 65583.2 (h). 12/1/2026 Implementing Action 12 is in progress. The Draft EIR for the rezoning and general plan and land use designation updates has been published and the Final EIR is in preparation.

HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to
Achieve RHNA
Implementing Action 13: Amend zoning code to remove constraints to housing production including:
a. Reduce the off-street parking requirement for studio and one-bedroom units to one parking space per unit (covered or uncovered), and to require no guest parking. b. Revise use and density descriptions regarding the term “Family” within the zoning regulations. The definition of family will affirm persons with disabilities are not subject to any potential special regulations such as the number of persons, population types, licenses, higher discretionary standards or other requirements that do not apply to other residential uses in the same zoning district.
c. Increase height limits where necessary to achieve RHNA capacity on sites as indicated on Table 4.
d. Reduce setbacks where necessary to achieve RHNA capacity on sites as indicated on Table 4.
12/1/2026 Implementing
Action 13 (a), (b), (c) and (d) are in progress. The Draft EIR for the rezoning and general plan and land use designation updates has been published and the Final EIR is in preparation. The comment period is closed and the Final EIR is estimated to be presented to the City Council by the end of May 2025. The revised housing element, to be considered by City Council in March 2025, includes a revised completion timeline for this implementation action.

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
Housing Programs Progress Report
Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

6.a
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Report - Housing Element and General HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining
Modernize zoning code to make it easier to use,
foster greater development in select areas, and
streamline the application submittal and review
processes. Address land use and processing and
permitting procedure constraints to make the
production of housing more likely. This program is a
citywide comprehensive code update to remove
barriers to housing development, improve the function
and interpretation of the zoning code, and to ensure
consistency with the updated 2040 General Plan.

Implementing Action 1: Comprehensive Zoning Regulation modernization to increase the potential for development with a focus on areas identified in the general plan for increased density. The potential changes described within this action item are intended to facilitate housing development in areas identified for increased density in the General Plan and are not required to demonstrate RHNA capacity.

Implementing Action 2: Establish minimum transportation related objective standards including but not limited to minimum site distance, turning radii, driveway/drive aisle width, on-street and off-street parking design, non-vehicular transportation features (e.g., bike lanes and sidewalks), and street width standards.

Implementing Action 3: Adopt Objective Design Standards for multi-family residential projects and mixed-use projects with a
residential component. Development of Objective Design Standards began in fall of 2023 to be adopted
by December 2024.

Implementing Action 4: Amend Planned-Development Zoning District to eliminate potential barriers to multi-family and
affordable housing development, including but not limited to reconsideration of the cost revenue analysis and general list of price ranges requirements. Clarify language regarding multi-family developments and the term “unit” in this context by December 2025.

Implementing Action 5: Develop Zoning Code amendments to align with SB 330 objective standard requirements and make a
recommendation to the City Council by December 2024.

Implementing Action 1, 2 by
12/1/2027; Implementing
Action 3 by 12/1/2024;
Implementing Action 4 by
12/1/2025; and Implementing
Action 5 by 12/1/2024
Implementing Actions 1, 2, 4 and 5 have not started. The revised housing element, to be considered by City Council in March 2025, includes a revised completion timeline for this program.

Note regarding Implementating Action 5: Although Zoning Codes amendments specific to SB330 have not yet started, the City continues to comply with the requirements of SB 330. The revised housing element, to be considered by City Council in March 2025, includes a revised completion timeline for this implementation action.

Implementing Action 3 is in progress. The Draft EIR for the rezoning and general plan and land use designation updates has been published and the Final EIR is in preparation.

HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining
Implementing Action 6: Establish priority building permit processing and reduced plan check times for multi-family housing projects affordable to lower-income households or units that serve special needs populations.

Implementing Action 7: Establish a process to facilitate ministerial approvals where feasible to expedite the review and approval of housing projects. For example, establishing projects of up to 20 dwelling units that are affordable to lowerincome households as a permitted use in multi-family and mixed-use zones.

Implementing Action 8: The City shall initiate a standard operating procedure where the Planning Department determines the level of CEQA review for a proposed development within 30 days after deeming a development application complete, with a possible 15-da extension if the project applicant and lead agency agree, in accordance with the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21080.2. The timeframes for processing applications after a CEQA determination shall be in accordance with the Permit Streamlining Act, Government Code 65950(a)(5). If a project is found to be exempt from CEQA, then relevant provisions
of the Permit Streamlining Act shall apply, and the application shall be processed within 60 days (Gov. Code 65950(a)(5).)
12/1/2027 Implementing Action 6 has not started.

Implementing Action 7 is in progress as a part of the rezoning program. The Draft EIR for the rezoning and general plan and land use designation updates has been published and the Final EIR is in preparation. The comment period is closed and the Final EIR is estimated to be presented to the City Council by the end of May 2025.

Implementing Action8 is complete and established as the standard operating procedure for applications. The revised
housing element, to be considered by City Council in March 2025, includes a revised completion timeline for this program.

HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining
Implementing Action 9: Revise Site Development Permit (PSD) findings for approval to remove subjective findings required toapprove residential projects or mixed-use projects that include residential use. The revised findings will focus on verifying objective development standard, objective design standard, and objective transportation standard compliance. Implementing Action 10: Revise zoning to remove the requirement for approval of a Conditional Use Permit (UP) to authorize residential uses consistent with the General Plan including but not limited to land use and density.

Implementing Action 11: Rezone properties that are undeveloped, designated in the General Plan for residential use, and zoned as P-D (Planned Development) to a non-P-D zoning classification aligned with their allowable use(s) and permissible densities in the General Plan to establish an approval process for these sites that does not require legislative approval by City Council (the Development Plan).

Implementing Action 12: Site assembly: to assist multi-parcel sites such as shopping centers consider establishing a site consolidation incentive by December 2025. This cou include a technical assistance program, specific planning processes, establishing a graduated density incentive for lot consolidation or front-loading CEQA analysis to make the sites more likely to be redeveloped into housing/mixed use.

Implementing Action 13: Incentivize the production of large units with 3 or more bedrooms to meet the needs of lower income families by reducing parking requirements for units that include 3 or more bedrooms and are affordable to lower-income households.

Implementing Action 14: Initiate any required CEQA environmental analysis for the comprehensive zoning modernization program by January 2026. 12/1/2027 Implementing Actions 9, 10, 11, 12 13 and 14 have not started. The revised housing element, to be considered by City Council in March 2025, includes a revised completion timeline for this program.

HE-I-3: Master Planning and Implementation for
Public Sites Accommodate the
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Sites Inventory by
evaluating public lands to support future housing
development. Address constraints associated with
land cost and land use controls.

Implementing Action 1: Proactively engage public agency landowners including the Jefferson Union High School District, Pacifica School District, North Coast County Water District, County of San Mateo, and others, to develop a common long-range land use vision for all publicly owned property within the city in 2023 and 2024. The City will conduct a “fit study” to determine the feasibility of future efforts by June 2024 and subsequently examine if rezoning or redesignation would be appropriate for any publicly owned sites, in addition to any sites identified in HE-I-1 and bring a recommendation to the City Council by December 2024.

Implementing Action 2: The City will pursue a partnership with Pacifica School District to explore implementation requirements of an interagency partnership to use the City's current corporation yard for district offices, ideally including housing above, and consolidate City and District corporation yard functions at the existing District corporation yard at 375 Reina del Mar Avenue by December 2026 Implementing Action 1 by
12/1/2024 and Implementing
Action 2 by 12/1/2026
Implementing Action 1 is not started. Implementing
Action 2 is on pause. While initial coordination occurred during the development of the housing element, this initiative will be continued following the completion and approval of comprehensive zoning amendments (Program HE-I-1).

The revised housing element, to be considered by City Council in March 2025, includes a revised completion timeline for this implementation action.

HE-I-4: Support Development of Accessory
Dwelling Units Increase the rate of
ADU production to expand the number of units
affordable to lower-income households in higher
resource areas across the city. Address constraints
associated with land cost, construction cost,
financing, and land use controls as they relate to the
production of ADUs.

Implementing Action 1: Provide technical ADU design tools and resources to homeowners to encourage ADU development,including pre-approved ADU plans (e.g., HEART) to increase the rate of production of affordable ADUs beyond the number developed over the previous planning period.

Implementing Action 2: Evaluate developing a “building permit ready ADU” program and plans that have been pre-approved by
the Building Division and conform to the current building code and present a recommendation to the City Council.

Implementing Action 3: Strengthen the ADU OneStop shop program to provide additional information and technical assistance to understand ADU regulations.

Implementing Action 4: Collaborate with other jurisdictions to develop a regional forgivable loan program for homeowners to
construct an ADU that is held affordable for extremely low-income households for a minimum term.

Implementing Action 5: Annually identify and pursue funding applications (federal, state local, nonprofit and private) to support the development of ADUs with low interest loans and/or grants and other incentives.

Implementing Action 6: Study and bring suggestions to City Council to revise development standards for ADUs to incentivize greater ADU production beyond the requirements in state law (including tuck-under parking, allowing multiple ADUs, increasing height limits and reducing setbacks
12/1/2026 Implementing Action 1 is in progress. The City makes a financial contribution to the ADU Resource Center of San Mateo County as a part of a shared services contract. Through this initiative the City is in the process of launching an online ADU Plans gallery.

Implementing Action 2 is in progress via ADU Accelerator Program of the ADU Resource Center of San Mateo County.

Implementing Action 3 is in progress through the ADU Resource Center of San Mateo County.

Implementing Actions 4, 5 and 6 are not started. The
revised housing element, to be considered by City Council in March 2025, includes a revised completion timeline for this implementation action.

HE-I-5: Fund a Housing Action Fund
Fund a Housing Action Fund to support housing
projects or other
supportive activities to remove constraints on housing
production and promote development of
multi-family rental and for-sale housing.

Implementing Action 1: By
December 2024, hire consultant to study best practices in establishing and funding a loc housing fund using available funding sources and utilizing that fund to leverage new funding sources, including the Bay
Area Housing Finance Authority (BAHC) and the Bay Area Preservation Pilot Fund (BAPP). Implementing Action 2: By December 2025,
explore other funding opportunities to support affordable housing development. Efforts include actively tracking available Federal, State, Regional, and Local funding opportunities for affordable housing and determining how to leverage these funds to build or rehabilitate more affordable housing. Actively coordinate with city partners, including nonprofit housing developers on how best to leverage these resources.

Implementing Action 3: By December 2024, identify funding to address limitations on staff capacity to implement the othe implementation actions articulated in the Housing Element, including LEAP and REAP grants. Implementing
Action 4: By December 2024, study the City’s participation in a shared housing capacity program being considered by the County of San Mateo County and other jurisdictions within San Mateo County.

Implementing Action 5: Establish extremely-low-income housing units, larger, lower income family units (3+ bedrooms), and units for people with disabilities including developmental disabilities as high priority investments for the housing fund.

Implementing Action 6: Develop an annual strategy for the raising and disposition of funds. Staff to provide annual reports to the City Council.

Implementing Action 1 by
12/1/2024; Implementing
Action 2 by 12/1/2025;
Implementing Action 3 and 4
by 12/1/2024; Implementing
Action 5 and 6 by 12/1/2026
Implementing Action 1 is not started. Implementing
Actions 2 is in progress. Staff actively tracks and pursues funding opportunities annually.

Implementing Actions 3, 4, 5 and 6 are not started. The revised housing element, to be considered by City Council in March 2025, includes a revised completion timeline for this implementation action.

6.a
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Report - Housing Element and General HE-I-6: Strengthen Inclusionary Housing Program
Commission a study to evaluate revisions to current
Below Market Rate (inclusionary zoning) program to
increase the minimum required proportion of
affordable units and incentivize production of units
with deeper
affordability than the current program.

Implementing Action 1: Commission a study to evaluate revisions to current BMR program to increase the minimum required proportion of affordable units and incentivize production of units with deeper affordability than the current program.

Implementing Action 2: Adjust the City's BMR program to allow a smaller unit contribution (<15%), larger density bonuses, and/or other incentives in exchange for affordable units that address the needs of residents with disproportionate housing needs identified in HE-I-6.1.e and HE-I-6.1.f above.

Implementing Action 3: Subsequent to an examination of feasibility, adjust the City’s BMR program to allow higher percentages of housing units for extremely low-income households in exchange for additional flexibility to meet obligations through a combination of an in-lieu fee and
affordable unit contribution.

Implementing Action 4: Revise the BMR marketing requirement to ensure that BMR units in new developments are marketed to
residents outside of the RCAA, for example, by marketing units in schools outside the RCAA to reach lower income families in need of affordable housing.

Implementing Action 5: Strengthen the administration of the BMR program by creating written program guidelines and implementation procedures and seeking external program administration support.

Implementing Action 6: Once the new ordinance is adopted, the City will develop an implementation guidebook that includes clear explanations for implementing the ordinance with example projects
12/1/2025 Implementing Actions 1-6 have not started.

HE-I-7: Preserve Existing Affordable Housing
Units Preserve the city’s deed-restricted
affordable units that will expire in the next decade and develop a plan for preservation of all existing
affordable units to keep them affordable long term.

Protect residents of less-expensive market-provided
units.

Implementing Action 1: To preserve housing units affordable to extremely low-income households, the City will develop an
inventory of extremely low-income units in the city (units serving households that earn le than 30% AMI).

Implementing Action 2: In the event City receives Notice of Intent to convert to market rate housing, conduct tenant outreach and education.

Implementing Action 3: Develop a long-term funding plan for preservation of at-risk units to keep them affordable long term by December 2024.

Implementing Action 4: Consider revisions to land use policies necessary to ensure there is not an economic incentive to discontinue and redevelop affordable units at risk of conversion to market rate.

Implementing Action 5: Amend the Zoning Code to incorporate specific requirements stipulated in California Government Code
Section 66300 pertaining to the replacement of protected housing units.

Implementing Action 6: Preserve the affordability of existing affordable housing by requiring replacement of Below Market Rate units lost during any construction, redevelopment, or demolition projects.

Implementing Action 7: Pursue HEART program to fund acquisition and preservation of existing rental units to preserve as affordable housing.

Implementing Action 8: Evaluate policies to prevent the conversion of existing affordable housing units to less affordable housing types 12/1/2026 Implementing Actions 1 and 2 are in progress. The property owner of the City's deedrestricted below-market-rate units (one property containing 101 affordable units) has informed the City that it has completed a five year renewal agreement with HUD to preserve affordability of the units.

Implementing Actions 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 are not started.

The revised housing element, to be considered by City Council in March 2025, includes a revised completion timeline for this implementation action.

HE-I-8: Rehabilitation of Homes in Lower
Resource and Coastal Areas Support
maintenance and rehabilitation activities that improve
the condition of the city’s existing housing stock in
order to preserve existing housing options, especially
for extremely low-income households and households
with special needs. Address any building code
constraints to facilitate preservation of existing
housing stock.

Implementing Action 1: The City will add home maintenance education resources to its website by 2024.

Implementing Action 2: The City will conduct a survey to ascertain the housing conditions and rehabilitation or accessibility needs for existing homeowners and properties located in low resource areas by 2027.

Implementing Action 3: Pursue opportunities to create repair and rehabilitation programs to address housing units in need of repair in low-resource areas by 2026.

Implementing Action 5: Staff will initiate a proactive property identification program by December 2026. Code enforcement staff to identify properties in need of significant maintenance – prior to receipt of a complaint and initiation of enforcement activity – to ascertain with property owners and occupants
any underlying reasons for the degraded property condition, and connection with available local, state, and federal resources that can assist with property rehabilitation.

Implementing Action 6: Staff will initiate a coastal housing preservation program by December 2026: The City will update its operating procedures including all applicable forms to require as an application submittal requirement information about the income levels of building occupants prior to issuance of any permit to authorize demolition or conversion of a dwelling unit to a nonresidential use within the Coastal Zone.

Implementing Action 1 by
12/1/2024; Implementing
Action 2 by 12/1/2027;
Implementing Action 3 by
12/1/2026; Implementing
Action 5 and 6 by 12/1/2026
Implementing Actions 1-6 have not started.

HE-I-9: Housing for Extremely Low-Income,
Special, and Disproportionate Needs Reduce
development constraints on the construction of
extremely low-income units as well as a variety of
housing types to meet the needs of populations with
special and disproportionate housing needs.

Implementing Action 1: For any projects that include extremely low-income units or housing for special needs populations with an emphasis on housing for extremely lowincome households and people with disabilities including developmental disabilities, homeless individuals and farmworkers, the City will complete evaluation of the following incentives:
a. Implement a streamlined review process to expedite development review. Develop a streamlined checklist to facilitate expedited application processing. b. Grant fee deferrals or waivers.
c. Allow exceptions to development standards and grant concessions. d. For any projects that include a city-incentive or public subsidy, prioritize project proposals that provide the most units for populations with disproportionate housing needs (i.e., include evaluation criteria
that grant more points for these projects).
e. Provide additional local density bonus, above the State Density Bonus Law. f. Reduce or remove parking requirements whenever feasible.

Implementing Action 2: Provide additional local density bonus, incentives, and/or concessions for housing projects that include a minimum number of units for people at the Extremely Low-Income affordability level (e.g., 5% of total units, to be confirmed by economic study)
6/1/2026 Implementing Actions 1 and 2 have not started.

HE-I-9: Housing for Extremely Low-Income,
Special, and Disproportionate Needs
Implementing Action 3: Target city-owned land, land dedicated to affordable housing and city housing funds to achieve city-specific priorities such as a percentage of the units subject to a preference for people with extremely low incomes or special housing needs.

The City will prioritize city-owned land and other resources to support development projects that maximize units suitable for the following special needs groups:
a. Extremely low-income households (households earning less than 30% AMI). b. People with developmental disabilities who receive services from the Golden Gate Regional Center.
c. Homeless individuals
d. Farmworkers
6/1/2026 Implementing Action 3 has not started.

HE-I-9: Housing for Extremely Low-Income,
Special, and Disproportionate Needs
Implementing Action 4: The City will annually identify and pursue funding applications (federal, state, nonprofit and private) to support the development of housing units for extremely low-income households or households with
disproportionate housing needs.

Implementing Action 5: On an ongoing basis and at least annually, the City will provide outreach and coordination with affordable housing developers to support the development of units for extremely low-income households or households with disproportionate housing needs. For example, the City can conduct outreach to neighborhood groups, stakeholders, advocates, and local businesses regarding the advantages of providing opportunities for new construction and preservation of SingleRoom-Occupancy (SROs) as a source of housing for extremely low-income households.

Implementing Action 6: To address unmet need for supportive housing and services the City will conduct additional outreach tobetter understand community needs, analyze existing regulations around small-size facilities, interview key intermediaries, and identify if there are licensing or other barriers that could be lowered.

Implementing Action 7: The City will prioritize the incentives above to support sites for development of extremely low-income housing in the RCAA as well as adjacent to the RCAA to increase access to opportunity for extremely low-income residents in higher resource areas.
6/1/2026 Implementing Actions 4-7 have not started.

6.a
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Report - Housing Element and General HE-I-10 Strengthen Services for Homelessness
Support social services for homeless residents and
homeless prevention and work with homeless service
providers to prioritize legal help, housing assistance, and other social services for unhoused families.

Implementing Action 1: The City shall support nonprofits that offer housing solutions and services for the homeless. The City shall support with staff expertise and funding, as available, nonprofit organizations that offer solutions to solving homelessness and/or provide housing related services for the homeless or at-risk homeless.

Implementing Action 2: The City shall continue its participation in HOPE (Housing Our People Effectively). The City shall be an
active participant in HOPE and support its efforts to address the needs of Pacifica’s homeless residents by attending at least three-quarters of all meetings during a calendar year.

Implementing Action 3: The City shall provide referrals to the Pacifica Resource Center helping families with social services for housing and homeless prevention.

Implementing Action 4: The City shall provide referrals to veterans and their immediate families that are homeless or at risk of homelessness.

Implementing Action 5: Evaluate the capacity for development of one year-round emergency shelter for homeless individuals within a zoning district that permits the emergency shelter use to ensure the zoning district(s) can meet the need established by the 2022 San Mateo County Point In Time County. Evaluation will be completed within one year of Housing Element adoption.

Implementation Actions 1-4
by 1/1/2025; Implementation
Action 5 within one year of
HE adoption.

Implementing Actions 1-4 are ongoing and completed on a regular basis.

Implementing Action 5 has not started.

HE-I-11: Support Fair Housing Enforcement and
Outreach Capacity Maintain and distribute
accurate information about fair housing law and
policies and regulate existing loopholes related to
substantial remodels.

Implementing Action 1: Identify inconsistencies between fair housing laws and the Zoning Code and include consistency with fair housing laws in the Zoning Code Update (program HE-I-2) by 2025.

Implementing Action 2: Partner with local fair housing organization to complete a study session with City Council on fair housing laws by June 2025.

Implementing Action 3: The City shall support nonprofits providing legal counseling and advocacy concerning fair housing laws, rights, and remedies to those who believe they have been discriminated against by referring persons requesting information or assistance related to housing discrimination to one or more fair housing groups for legal services on an ongoing basis.

Implementing Action 4: Brochures providing information on fair housing and tenants’ rights will be available at City Hall, public libraries and on the City’s website. The brochures will also be available at nonprofit organizations serving low-income residents.

The brochures will be available in multiple languages by June 2025 and ongoing.

Implementing Action 5: As funding allows, the City shall provide annual funding assistance to organizations that provide fair housing, tenant/landlord, and habitability counseling and other general housing assistance by June 2025 and ongoing.

Implementing Action 6: Consider an ordinance requiring a building permit as a prerequisite to serving a substantial renovation eviction notice under the Ellis Act by June 2025.

Implementing Action 1 by
12/1/2025; Implementing
Action 2 by 6/1/2025;
Implementing Actions 3, 4, 5,
and 6 by 6/1/2025
Implementing actions 1-6 have not started.

HE-I-12: Fair Housing Affirmative Marketing
Strategy To support and engage in
efforts to educate community stakeholders and
residents, in particular those with special needs about housing gaps and the effects of programs and
policies on addressing those gaps. Proactively create
opportunities for all communities to have a voice and
be involved in shaping policies and programs.

Implementing Action 1: Research other cities and best practices to create an affirmative marketing strategy for Fair Housing information and resources by June 2024.

Implementing Action 2: Partner with local fair housing organization to provide training on an annual basis for landlords and tenants at least annually by June 2024, and ongoin Implementing Action 3: Conduct the following proactive outreach by June 2025 and on an annual basis:
a. Conduct proactive outreach about fair housing issues (i.e., explain the right to request reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities), with residents and other stakeholders. Outreach will be conducted at least annually during the planning period and may include sharing information via newsletters, email communication, events, or social media.
b. Continue to inform realtors, builders, City staff, and the community at large about fair housing law and policies, through information posted on city’s website and handouts available at City Hall, Library, the Senior Center and other city facilities (ongoing). c. Continue to participate in Countywide (and other) efforts to share best practices on equitable engagement and inclusive outreach. (e.g., Home For All “Learning Network”) d. Include Spanish marketing materials and ensure bilingual interpretation services are available. Other languages may also be included in some instances.

Implementing Action 4: Complete fair housing website updates listed on pp. 47 of the HE by June 2025.

Implementing Action 1 by
6/1/2024; Implementing
Action 2 by 6/1/2024;
Implementing Actions 3a-3d
and 4 by 6/1/2025
Implementing Actions 1-4 have not started.

HE-I-12: Fair Housing Affirmative Marketing
Strategy
Implementing Action 5: Proactively Market Available Housing Opportunities to Residents with Disproportionate Housing Needs by June 2025 and ongoing (see pp. 47 of HE).

Implementing Action 6: Identify any existing service providers along the Coastside that support farmworker housing needs to gain greater insight into potential farmworker housing needs in Pacifica. Work cooperatively with local growers, agriculture-related businesses (such as packing and distribution facilities), the farm bureau, and advocates for farmworkers such as the California Rural Legal Assistance (CRLA) in order to determine available resources and shortfalls.

Implementing Action 7: Increase educational outreach efforts on fair housing issues related to frequent housing discrimination faced by farmworkers due to their ethnicity and type of employment, landlord/tenant issues and the Employee Housing Act related to farm laborers, farm labor contractors and agricultural employers.

Implementing Action 5 by
6/1/2025; Implementing
Action 6 and 7 by 12/1/2025
Implementing Actions 5-7 have not started.

HE-I-13: Infrastructure Capacity Improvements
Ensure adequate utilities, transportation and other
infrastructure to accommodate future housing needs
and address any infrastructure constraints to make
the production of housing more likely.

Implementing Action 1: Include projects in the city's Five-Year Capital Improvement Program, and in other long-term improvement plans, initiatives to eliminate infrastructure capacity constraints (including, if necessary, replacement and rehabilitation (R&R) projects in the Vallemar and Rockaway Beach neighborhoods) that may limit housing production, by December 2027.

Implementing Action 2: Explore the feasibility of expanding transportation services generally, and in particular for focused services for seniors, people with disabilities, and lower-income residents. Strengthen transportation networks that connect residents with services and economic opportunities, including through partnerships with transportation agencies.
a. Support improvements to public transit routes, services and facilities to facilitate longer distance travel. Activities would include encouraging SamTrans to improve service coverage, frequency, and operating hours in these areas, in part by helping the agency better understand where this special needs population is located in Pacifica. b. Commit the City’s representatives on the regional Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) boards and committees to
actively advocate for transportation and transit planning improvements in Pacifica. c. Continue capital investments in sidewalk and bike lane projects with priority in the identified areas of need to improve mobility and access to employment opportunities. d. The City will encourage development of housing for seniors, people with disabilities, and lower-income residents near public transit and areas with amenities. 12/1/2027 Implementing Action 1 is in progress. The Rockaway Beach and Vallemar projects are included in the City's 5-Year CIP. Design started in 2024 and construction is estimated to begin in 2029 for Rockaway beach and 2030 for Vallemar.

Implementing Action 2 is in progress. The Sharp Park ADA Pedestrian Improvement Project will close sidewalk gaps, improve sidewalks to current ADA standards, install new ADA-compliant driveways and corner curb ramps in the six blocks around downtown area; the project bid closed in November 2024 and construction is estimated to begin in 2025.

The Esplanade and Palmetto Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project was approved by Planning Commission and City Council in 2024, and will install new and improve existing Class 2 and Class 3 bike lanes along Palmetto Avenue, West Avalon Drive, and Esplanade Avenue. The project will also enhance pedestrian safety by installin quick-build painted bulbout safety zones at pedestrian crossings, curb ramps, high visibility crosswalks, and rectangular rapid flashing beacons at several intersections.

6.a
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Report - Housing Element and General HE-I-14: State and Federal Law Conformance
Amend the zoning ordinance and other local policies
to remove any inconsistencies between local policies
and State and Federal law.

Implementing Action 1: Monitor housing production against ABAG Fair Share Allocation, including regarding no net loss compliance, during planning period, and provide an annual report on housing production to the City Council each year, prior to submittal of the Annual Progress Report to HCD and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) by April 1st of each year.

Implementing Action 2: Review, and where appropriate amend, the Zoning Code to establish a By-Right designation for housing sites reused from prior Housing Element for housing projects that propose a minimum of 20 percent affordable units, where appropriate, by December 2026.

Implementing Action 3: Amend Zoning Regulations to adopt an ordinance and administrative procedures implementing SB 9 by December 2025.

Implementing Action 4: Amend Zoning Regulations to adopt an ordinance and administrative procedures implementing SB 35 by December 2025.

Implementing Action 5: Amend Zoning Regulations to define employee housing (farmworker housing) and regulate the use in accordance with Health and Safety Code Sections 17021.5, 17021.6 and 17021.8, which precludes a local government from requiring a conditional use permit, zoning variance, and/or other zoning clearance for certain employee housing, including agricultural employee housing, by December 2025.

Implementing Action 6: Amend Zoning Regulations to define Transitional and Supportive Housing and regulate the use in accordance with Government Code Section 65651 by December 2025.

Implementing Action 1 by
4/1/2025; Implementing
Action 2 by 12/1/2026;
Implementing Action 3, 4, 5
and 6 by 12/1/2025
Implementing Action 1 is complete with submittal of this APR and ongoing.

Implementing Action 2 is in progress. This is included as a part of the zoning amendments underway. Draft EIR for the rezoning and general plan and land use designation updates has been published, and the Final EIR is in preparation. The comment period is closed and the Final EIR is estimated to be presented to the City Council by the end of May 2025.

Implementing Action 3 is complete and ongoing. Council has adopted interim guidelines in compliance with state law (Resolution 11-2022). A draft updated ordinance in progress Implementing Action 4 is in progress and ongoing. While the City has not yet adopted an ordinance, applications are processed in compliance with SB 35. The Planning division has administrative internal procedures that are in compliance with state law and consistent with SB 35. The City Council will consider an ordinance confirming procedures in 2025.

Implementing Action 5 and 6 are not started and will be completed as a part of a cleanup ordinance to amend the zoning regulations to ensure conformance with state and federal laws.

HE-I-14: State and Federal Law Conformance
Implementing Action 7: Amend Zoning Regulations to define Low Barrier Navigation Centers in accordance with Government Code Section 65660 and regulate the use in compliance with Government Code Sections 65662 through 65666 by December 2025.

Implementing Action 8: Amend Zoning Regulations to define Emergency Shelter and identify one or more zoning designations that allow residential uses, including mixed use where they will be allowed as a permitted use without a conditional use or other discretionary permit and that are suitable for residential uses in compliance with Government Code Section 65583(a)(4)(A) through (J) by December 2023.

Implementing Action 9: Review, and if appropriate amend, Zoning Code to implement AB 2162 and allow by-right 100 percent affordable housing that has 25 percent or 12 units of permanent supportive housing, where multi-family or mixed-use housing is permitted by December 2025.

Implementing Action 10: Distribute the certified Housing Element to local water and other utility providers and encourage them to grant service priority/allocations to developments that contain units affordable to persons with lower incomes by December 2024.

Implementing Action 7 by
12/1/2025; Implementing
Action 8 by 12/1/2023;
Implementing Action 9 by
12/1/2025; Implementing
Action 10 by 12/1/2024
Implementing Action 8 is complete for areas outside the coastal zone. To implement this, Ordinance No. 894-C.S. was adopted on December 11, 2023, and is effective for areas outside the coastal zone on January 10, 2024.

Implementing Actions 7, 9, and 10 are not started and will be completed as a part of a clean-up program to amend the zoning regulations to ensure conformance with state and federal laws.

HE-I-14: State and Federal Law Conformance
Implementing Action 11: Allow group homes for seven or more residents, specifically for people with disabilities, as a permitted use in all zoning districts allowing residential uses by December 2025. Amend the Zoning Code to remove the 500-foot spacing requirement and apply the same types of zoning standards to group homes with seven or more persons as would apply to other similar housing types in the same zoning district.

Implementing Action 12: Consider requiring replacement of existing affordable units in conformance with Government Code Section 65583.2(g)(3).

Implementing Action 13: Update the Zoning Code to ensure Pacifica’s ADU Ordinance conforms to state law. Following a review of Pacifica’s ADU Ordinance, HCD provided a list of ADU non-compliance issues which included the definition of site, minimum landscaping requirements, parking, and subjective standards, among others. Complete ADU Ordinance update by December 2024.

Implementing Action 14: Single-Room-Occupancy (SRO) is not specifically identified as a separate allowed use in the Pacifica Municipal Code but is conditionally permitted as “Boardinghouse” as a conditional use subject to approval of a use permit in the R-3, R-3, R-3-G, and R-5 zoning districts. Boardinghouse is currently defined as “a dwelling other than a hotel where lodging and meals for five (5) or more persons are provided for compensation.” Consider amendment to the zoning and building code to facilitate and encourage new SRO construction.

Implementing Action 15: Ensure compliance with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) for the Environs of San Francisco International Airport (November 2012) (“SFO ALUCP”).

Implementing Action 11, 12,
14 and 15 by 12/1/2025;
Implementing Action 13 by
12/1/2024;
Implementing Actions 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 are not started and will be completed as a part of a clean-up program to amend the zoning regulations to ensure conformance with state and federal laws.

6.a
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Report - Housing Element and General Jurisdiction Pacifica ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Period 2024
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31) Housing Element Implementation
Planning 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031
Description of
Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
34 APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Very Low
Income
Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above Moderate
Income
Description of
Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Units Constructed as Part of Agreement
Commercial Development Bonus Approved pursuant to GC Section 65915.7 Table E
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Project Identifier
1 2
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
(CCR Title 25 §6202)

6.a
Packet Pg. 154
Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Jurisdiction Pacifica ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Period 2024
(
31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031
The description should adequately document how each unit complies with subsection (c) of Government Code Section 65583.1+.

For detailed reporting requirements, see the chcklist here:

Extremely LowIncome+ Very Low- Income+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+ Extremely Low- Income+ Very Low- Income+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+ https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community- development/docs/adequate-sites-checklist.pdf Rehabilitation ActivityPreservation of Units At-RiskAcquisition of UnitsMobilehome Park PreservationTotal Units by Income Table F
Please note this table is optional: The jurisdiction can use this table to report units that have been substantially rehabilitated, converted from non-affordable to affordable by acquisition, and preserved, including mobilehome park preservation, consistent with the standards set forth in Government Code section 65583.1, subdivision (c). Please note, motel, hotel, hostel rooms or other structures that are converted from non-residential to residential units pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c)(1)(D) are considered net-new housing units and must be reported in Table A2 and not reported in Table F.

Activity Type
Units that Do Not Count Towards RHNA+
Listed for Informational Purposes Only
Units that Count Towards RHNA +
Note - Because the statutory requirements severely limit what can be counted, please contact HCD at [email protected] and we will unlock the form which enable you to populate these fields.

Units Rehabilitated, Preserved and Acquired for Alternative Adequate Sites pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c)

6.a
Packet Pg. 155
Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Jurisdiction Pacifica ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Reporting Period 2024 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulasPlanning Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031 Notes
23 6
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID
Unit
Category
(2 to 4,5+)
Tenure
R=Renter
Very LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
Low- Income Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Total Moderate Income
Units Converted from
Above Moderate
Date
Converted Notes
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 00 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table F2
Above Moderate Income Units Converted to Moderate Income Pursuant to Government Code section 65400.

For up to 25 percent of a jurisdiction’s moderate-income regional housing need allocation, the planning agency may include the number of units in an existing multifamily building that were converted to deed-restricted rental housing for moderate-income households by the imposition of affordability covenants and restrictions for the unit. Before adding information to this table, please ensure housing developments meet the requirements described in Government Code 65400.2(b). 5 Project Identifier Unit Types
1 4
Affordability by Household Incomes After Conversion Units credited toward Moderate Income RHNA

6.a
Packet Pg. 156
Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Jurisdiction Pacifica
Reporting Period 2024
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31)
Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031 ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation
23 4
APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Realistic
Capacity
Identified in the
Housing
Element
Entity to whom the site
transferred Intended Use for Site
1 Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Note: "+" indicates an optional fieldCells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Table G
Locally Owned Lands Included in the Housing Element Sites Inventory that have been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of Project Identifier
NOTE: This table must only be filled out if the housing element sites inventory contains a site which is or was owned by the reporting jurisdiction, and has been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of during the reporting

6.a
Packet Pg. 157
Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Jurisdiction Pacifica Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting
Period 2024
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31)
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Designation Size Notes
1 2 34 5 6 7
APN Street Address/Intersection Existing Use Number of Units Surplus Designation Parcel Size (in acres) Notes 022-162-420 540 Crespi Drive Other Surplus Land 0.7 Partial driveway, park, and vacant land NOTE: This table must contain an invenory of ALL surplus/excess lands the reporting jurisdiction owns Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Parcel Identifier

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
Table H
Locally Owned Surplus Sites
For San Mateo County jurisdictions, please format the APN's as follows:999-999-999

6.a
Packet Pg. 158
Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Jurisdiction Pacifica ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Period 2024
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31) Housing Element Implementation
Planning Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031
Project Type Date
Units
(Beds/Student
Capacity) Granted
Notes
23 56
APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Unit Category
(SH - Student Housing) Date
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Total Additional
Beds Created Due
to Density Bonus
Notes
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Table J
Student housing development for lower income students for which was granted a density bonus pursuant to subparagraph (F) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 65915 Project Identifier Units (Beds/Student Capacity) Approved 1 4
NOTE: STUDENT HOUSING WITH DENSITY BONUS
ONLY. This table only needs to be completed if there
were student housing projects WITH a density bonus
approved pursuant to Government Code65915(b)(1)(F)

6.a
Packet Pg. 159
Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Jurisdiction Pacifica ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Period 2024 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Planning Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031 No
Table K
Tenant Preference Policy
Local governments are required to inform HCD about any local tenant preference ordinance the local government maintains when the jurisdiction submits their annual progress report on housing approvals and production, per Government Code 7061 (SB 649, 2022, Cortese). Effective January 1, 2023, local governments adopting a tenant preference are required to create a webpage on their internet website containing authorizing local ordinance and supporting materials, no more than 90 days after the ordinance becomes operational.

Does the Jurisdiction have a local tenant preference policy? If the jurisdiction has a local tenant preference policy, provide a link to the jurisdiction's webpage containing authorizing local ordinance and supporting materials.

Notes

6.a
Packet Pg. 160
Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress Jurisdiction Pacifica
Reporting Year 2024 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Total Award Amount Total award amount is auto-populated based on amounts entered in rows 15-26.

Task $ Amount Awarded $ Cumulative Reimbursement Requested Other Funding Notes Housing Element Update $54,500.00 $54,500.00 Other
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
Update $95,500.00 $95,500.00 Other
Summary of entitlements, building permits, and certificates of occupancy (auto-populated from Table A2) Current Year
Deed Restricted 0Non-Deed Restricted 0Deed Restricted 0Non-Deed Restricted 0Deed Restricted 0Non-Deed Restricted 0 22 Current Year
Deed Restricted 0Non-Deed Restricted 7Deed Restricted 0Non-Deed Restricted 8Deed Restricted 0Non-Deed Restricted 0 5 20
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0Non-Deed Restricted 10Deed Restricted 0Non-Deed Restricted 8Deed Restricted 0Non-Deed Restricted 17 8 43

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Reporting
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Please update the status of the proposed uses listed in the entity’s application for funding and the corresponding impact on housing within the region or jurisdiction, as applicable, categorized based on the eligible uses specified in Section 50515.02 or 50515.03, as applicable.
$ 150,000.00
Task Status
Completed
In Progress
Total Units
Certificate of Occupancy Issued by Affordability Summary Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Completed Entitlement Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low

6.a
Packet Pg. 161
Attachment: Exhibit A 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (5891 : Annual Progress 4937-3651-9720 v1

CITY OF PACIFICA
170 Santa Maria Avenue • Pacifica, California 94044-2506 (650) 738-7341 • www.cityofpacifica.org
Scenic Pacifica
Incorporated Nov. 22, 1957
General Plan Annual Progress Report for City of Pacifica 2024 Calendar Year

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................2 DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY CITY COUNCIL........................................................................................2 DATE OF MOST RECENT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE .............................................................................2 IMPLEMENTATION OF VARIOUS ELEMENTS ........................................................................................2 Economic Sustainability Element............................................................................................2 Community Design Element....................................................................................................3 Land Use Element .....................................................................................................................3 Circulation Element..................................................................................................................4 Open Space and Community Facilities ................................................................................5 Conservation Element..............................................................................................................6 Safety Element ..........................................................................................................................7 Noise Element............................................................................................................................7 HOUSING ELEMENT...............................................................................................................................7 ATTACHMENT A: City Council Resolution No. _____.......................................................................10 ATTACHMENT B: Housing Element Annual Progress Report For Calendar Year 2024................11

6.b
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Exhibit B 2024 General Plan Annual Progress Report (5891 : Annual Progress Report - Housing Element and General Plan) General Plan Annual Progress Report
City of Pacifica
2024 Calendar Year

Page 2 ends

Pacifica City CouncilMarch 24, 2025

Pacifica City Council
March 24, 2025